SEC’s New Leadership Forms Task Force to Revamp Crypto Regulations

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), under its new leadership, announced on Tuesday the formation of a task force dedicated to establishing a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency assets. This represents the first significant step by President Donald Trump’s administration to reshape crypto policy.

Trump, who positioned himself as a “crypto president” during his campaign, has vowed to undo what he perceives as an aggressive regulatory stance implemented by former President Joe Biden’s SEC. Under Biden’s leadership, the SEC pursued legal actions against several crypto companies, including Coinbase and Kraken, accusing them of violating SEC rules.

The accused firms have consistently denied these allegations, asserting that the current SEC regulations are unsuitable for the crypto industry. They argue that the criteria determining whether a cryptocurrency qualifies as a security, thus falling under the SEC’s jurisdiction, remain unclear. For years, industry leaders have been calling on the SEC to provide a coherent and transparent regulatory framework for digital assets.

Tuesday’s initiative, spearheaded by Republican Commissioner Mark Uyeda, recently appointed by Trump as acting SEC chair, and Commissioner Hester Peirce, signals a significant policy win for the cryptocurrency sector under the new administration.

“The Task Force’s focus will be to help the Commission draw clear regulatory lines, provide realistic paths to registration, craft sensible disclosure frameworks, and deploy enforcement resources judiciously,” Uyeda’s office stated in the announcement.

Earlier this month, Reuters reported that Uyeda and Peirce were gearing up to launch the Trump administration’s overhaul of crypto policies, including initiating the rule-making process. Additionally, reports suggest Trump may soon issue executive orders to reduce regulatory scrutiny on the crypto industry while fostering the adoption of digital assets.

Jonathan Jachym, Kraken’s global head of policy, welcomed the development, stating in an email, “We are encouraged by this meaningful first step towards real policy solutions and ending the regulation by enforcement era of the past. We look forward to accelerating our policy engagement … to establish regulatory clarity.”

Investor enthusiasm over the crypto-friendly administration led to Bitcoin reaching a record high of $109,071 on Monday.

Beyond setting regulatory boundaries, the newly established task force will assist lawmakers in drafting cryptocurrency-related legislation. It will also work in collaboration with other federal entities, such as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and coordinate with state and international agencies, according to the SEC.

Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal expressed optimism about the shift in policy. “We have been saying for years to help us by crafting rules for crypto. Over the last four years, the answer was resoundingly ‘no,’” Grewal stated in a phone interview. “It is a new day.”

Billionaire Wealth Surges in 2024 as Inequality Deepens, Oxfam Reports

A recent report by Oxfam, titled Takers Not Makers, has revealed a dramatic increase in billionaire wealth in 2024, sparking concerns over widening global inequality. According to the report, billionaire fortunes surged by an astounding $2 trillion last year, which equates to an astonishing $5.7 billion per day. This pace of wealth accumulation is three times faster than the previous year, intensifying the disparity between the world’s richest and poorest populations.

Oxfam warns that the current trajectory could result in the world having at least five trillionaires within a decade. At the same time, nearly half the global population—approximately 3.5 billion people—continues to live in poverty. The World Bank has reported a stagnation in poverty reduction, a troubling trend not seen since 1990.

Unequal Wealth Growth in the UK

The United Kingdom has witnessed a significant spike in billionaire wealth in 2024. Combined wealth among UK billionaires grew by £35 million ($44 million) per day, reaching a total of £182 billion ($231 billion). To put this into perspective, this amount of money could cover the city of Manchester in £10 notes nearly 1.5 times.

The number of billionaires in the UK also increased, with four new individuals joining the ranks, bringing the total to 57. However, this wealth accumulation comes with concerns. Oxfam highlights that the UK has the highest proportion of billionaire wealth generated through monopolistic practices and cronyism among G7 nations. Specifically, 37% of UK billionaire wealth is linked to cronyism, while 15% stems from monopolistic ventures.

On a global scale, Oxfam’s report estimates that 60% of billionaire wealth is rooted in inheritance, monopoly power, or crony connections between the wealthy elite and governments. The analysis further notes that many European billionaires owe parts of their fortunes to historical colonial exploitation, which Oxfam describes as a form of “modern-day colonialism.”

Global South Faces Economic Exploitation

The Oxfam report sheds light on the persistent economic exploitation of the Global South, which continues to serve as the labor backbone for the global economy. According to the findings, 90% of the labor that drives the global economy comes from the Global South, yet workers in these regions receive a mere 21% of the global income.

Moreover, $30 million per hour is extracted from the Global South through financial systems that disproportionately benefit wealthier nations such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. These systems exacerbate inequality, as low- and middle-income countries are burdened by debt repayments that consume nearly half of their national budgets.

Between 1970 and 2023, governments in the Global South paid an eye-watering $3.3 trillion in interest to creditors in the Global North. Much of this money flowed to financial hubs like London and New York, perpetuating the cycle of wealth extraction from poorer nations.

Alarming Implications

Oxfam’s report underscores the urgent need for structural changes to tackle the growing wealth gap. The organization emphasizes the role of monopolies, inheritance, and cronyism in perpetuating billionaire wealth while leaving billions of people in poverty. The findings also draw attention to the historical and ongoing economic exploitation of the Global South, highlighting the stark disparity between those who contribute to the global economy and those who reap its benefits.

As global inequality deepens, the report serves as a stark reminder of the pressing need for policies that promote economic fairness and reduce the concentration of wealth among a small elite.

Rupee Hits Record Low Amid Global and Domestic Pressures

The Indian rupee continued its decline, reaching an all-time low of 85.35 against the US dollar in early trade on Friday. This marked the fourth consecutive session of depreciation, primarily driven by the robust dollar and heightened demand from importers. Adding to the pressure, foreign institutional investors sold shares worth Rs 2,376.67 crore in capital markets on Thursday, exacerbating the rupee’s struggles.

Domestic Challenges Compound Weakness

Domestically, the rupee’s depreciation has been influenced by a widening trade deficit and slowing economic growth. The currency has already dropped by 1.75% this quarter, reflecting deeper economic challenges.

Predictions for 2025

Economists expect the rupee to weaken further. Projections indicate the currency may touch 85.5 by the end of this fiscal year, with potential levels of 86 to 86.50 by December 2025. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is anticipated to intervene selectively in the foreign exchange market, curbing sharp appreciation while permitting controlled depreciation. This strategy is aimed at replenishing forex reserves, which have been depleted during prior interventions.

The RBI’s approach also aligns with global currency trends, including the depreciation of other major currencies such as the Chinese yuan. Analysts suggest that the dollar-rupee exchange rate could rise to 86-86.50 due to a combination of factors: a robust dollar index, persistent trade and fiscal deficits, increasing gold imports, and the possibility of foreign portfolio investors favoring China over India.

The Rupee’s Real Effective Exchange Rate

Despite the depreciation, the rupee demonstrated relative stability in November. The real effective exchange rate (REER), which adjusts the rupee’s value based on inflation and trade with key partners, appreciated to 108.14 in November from 107.20 in October—a 0.9% increase. According to an RBI report, this appreciation counterbalanced adverse price differentials, highlighting the rupee’s comparative steadiness amid global economic turbulence.

Emerging market currencies faced intense pressure in November due to foreign portfolio outflows, a stronger dollar, and rising US Treasury yields. Nevertheless, the rupee’s modest 0.4% depreciation against the dollar underscored its resilience. Additionally, it recorded the lowest volatility among major currencies, reflecting its relative strength in a volatile global environment.

Impact of a Strong Dollar

The dollar remains firmly supported, bolstered by expectations of expansionary policies under Donald Trump’s administration when he takes office in January 2025. Anticipated policies aimed at boosting growth and inflation have driven up US Treasury yields, strengthening the greenback. The dollar index has gained over 7% this quarter, remaining above the 108 level. This dollar strength continues to weigh on the rupee and other Asian currencies.

While these dynamics present challenges, proactive interventions by the RBI have helped the rupee display resilience compared to its peers.

Implications for India’s Import Bill

A depreciating rupee could increase India’s import bill by $15 billion if external conditions remain unchanged. Although short-term relief may come from low oil prices, other import-dependent sectors are vulnerable to cost pressures.

India imports 58% of its edible oil needs and 15-20% of its pulses consumption, leaving these commodities particularly susceptible to rising prices. This could strain food security and elevate fiscal burdens.

Similarly, higher prices for imported fertilisers like urea and DAP may exacerbate fiscal challenges.

Industrial imports, especially from China, represent another concern. India annually imports $100 billion worth of industrial goods from China. Sectors like electronics, where 80–90% of smartphone components are imported, may face costlier imports.

Additionally, India’s reliance on imported coal for thermal power and steel production heightens its exposure to currency fluctuations. For every one-rupee depreciation, coal-based electricity generation costs increase by 4 paise per unit, potentially impacting 75% of India’s electricity generation.

Managing Volatility in the Rupee

The Reserve Bank of India must adopt a nuanced strategy to manage currency volatility while addressing broader economic challenges. Experts suggest that gradual depreciation could offer multiple advantages:

  1. Boosting Export Competitiveness: A weaker rupee enhances the global appeal of Indian exports, potentially narrowing the trade deficit.
  2. Monetary Flexibility: With reduced focus on currency intervention, the RBI can allocate resources to tackle domestic economic priorities.
  3. Avoiding Disruptions: A measured depreciation reduces the likelihood of abrupt and destabilizing adjustments in currency markets.

The rupee’s trajectory will hinge on global economic trends, India’s growth prospects, and the broader outlook for emerging markets. Nations such as China, Brazil, and South Africa are also grappling with economic vulnerabilities, with geopolitical developments further influencing currency dynamics.

Broader Implications and the Path Forward

Policymakers in India face a delicate balancing act as external pressures and domestic vulnerabilities persist. While short-term currency interventions can provide temporary relief, a strategic approach focusing on gradual depreciation and boosting export competitiveness is crucial for long-term resilience.

By adopting this measured approach, the RBI can strengthen the economy’s capacity to withstand external shocks, ensuring stability in the face of global uncertainties.

Elon Musk Achieves Unprecedented $500 Billion Net Worth Milestone

Elon Musk, the visionary CEO of Tesla and SpaceX and the owner of X (formerly Twitter), has surpassed an extraordinary milestone, becoming the only person in history to reach a net worth exceeding $500 billion. This achievement, as reported by Bloomberg Billionaires, underscores Musk’s significant influence on industries ranging from electric vehicles and space exploration to artificial intelligence and social media. Remarkably, just a year earlier in December 2024, Musk’s wealth had already crossed the $400 billion mark, another historic first.

Tesla has transformed the electric vehicle market, reshaping the automotive industry, while SpaceX has redefined space exploration with major contracts, including collaborations with NASA. Musk’s bold acquisition and rebranding of Twitter as X and his contributions to AI development further highlight his role as a pioneering entrepreneur. His journey to such unparalleled wealth reflects his relentless pursuit of innovation and his ability to manage ambitious projects, cementing his place as one of the most influential figures in the modern era.

The Breakdown of Elon Musk’s $500 Billion Net Worth

Elon Musk’s extraordinary wealth is deeply tied to his stakes in groundbreaking companies. These assets not only define his financial success but also embody his vision for the future.

Tesla: The Largest Contributor

Tesla, a global leader in electric vehicles and renewable energy, is the primary driver of Musk’s wealth.

  • Ownership Stake: Musk owns 13% of Tesla, making it his most significant financial asset.
  • Stock Options: He possesses 304 million exercisable stock options from a 2018 compensation package, amplifying his ownership value.
  • Market Leadership: Tesla has revolutionized the automotive sector with innovations like advanced battery technologies, autonomous driving systems, and sustainable energy solutions. These achievements have solidified its status as the world’s most valuable carmaker, significantly boosting Musk’s net worth.

SpaceX: A Rising Star

SpaceX, Musk’s private aerospace company, plays a critical role in his financial empire and vision for the future.

  • Ownership: Musk controls 42% of SpaceX through a trust, ensuring his dominant stake.
  • Valuation: The company’s valuation reached $350 billion in December 2024.
  • Strategic Importance: SpaceX has pioneered reusable rocket technology and serves as NASA’s contractor for International Space Station resupply missions. Beyond government contracts, it is advancing commercial space travel and Mars colonization, aligning with Musk’s goal of making humanity a multiplanetary species.

X Corp: A Risky Bet

Musk’s acquisition of Twitter, rebranded as X, illustrates his audacious approach and the challenges he faces.

  • Ownership Stake: Musk owns 79% of X Corp following his $44 billion purchase in 2022.
  • Valuation Decline: Since the acquisition, X’s value has plummeted by 72%, as noted in Fidelity’s October 2024 filings.
  • Challenges: Transforming X into an “everything app” has been difficult, but Musk envisions integrating payments, communications, and other services into the platform.

Other Ventures: Expanding Frontiers

Musk’s portfolio includes ventures that explore new technological horizons:

  • Neuralink: Focused on brain-machine interfaces, Neuralink aims to enhance human cognition and treat neurological conditions through AI integration.
  • xAI: Established in 2023, xAI researches cutting-edge AI technologies with the mission to benefit humanity.
  • The Boring Company: Specializing in tunneling, this company develops urban transportation systems to alleviate traffic congestion.

Key Milestones in Musk’s Journey

Tesla’s Meteoric Rise

Tesla’s breakthrough came in July 2020 when it surpassed traditional automakers in valuation, becoming the world’s most valuable car manufacturer. By January 2021, this success elevated Musk to the title of the world’s richest person.

SpaceX’s Revolutionary Impact

With its reusable rockets and NASA contracts, SpaceX has redefined space exploration. The company’s Mars colonization plans exemplify Musk’s ambition to expand humanity’s reach beyond Earth.

Twitter Acquisition and Rebranding

In 2022, Musk acquired Twitter for $44 billion, rebranding it as X in 2023. Despite a 72% decline in valuation, Musk’s efforts to transform the platform into a comprehensive digital service continue, reflecting his bold, risk-taking nature.

Relocation of Tesla Headquarters

In October 2021, Musk announced Tesla’s move from Palo Alto, California, to Austin, Texas, aiming to streamline operations and align with favorable business policies.

Philanthropy and Vision for Humanity

Musk joined Warren Buffett’s Giving Pledge in 2012, showcasing his commitment to addressing global challenges through philanthropy. His vision of Mars colonization, driven by SpaceX, aligns with his broader goal of ensuring humanity’s survival and sustainability beyond Earth.

Strengths and Challenges

Strengths

  • Visionary Leadership: Musk’s ability to lead transformative ventures across diverse industries sets him apart.
  • Diversified Portfolio: His investments span multiple sectors, reducing reliance on any single market.
  • Technological Innovation: Musk’s companies consistently push boundaries, ensuring long-term relevance and growth.

Challenges

  • Valuation Risks: The decline in X Corp’s valuation highlights the financial risks associated with Musk’s ventures.
  • Polarizing Persona: Musk’s leadership style often sparks criticism, potentially affecting public perception and investor confidence.

A Legacy of Innovation and Boldness

Elon Musk’s $500 billion net worth reflects his unparalleled ability to disrupt industries and drive technological progress. His ventures in electric vehicles, space exploration, AI, and social media illustrate a relentless pursuit of innovation. As Musk himself has said, “Some people don’t like change, but you need to embrace change if the alternative is disaster.”

From Tesla’s dominance in sustainable transportation to SpaceX’s groundbreaking strides in space exploration, Musk’s influence extends across the globe. While challenges like valuation risks and public scrutiny remain, his boldness and ingenuity continue to shape the future, making him one of the most transformative figures of our time.

Wall Street Forecasts: S&P 500 Targets for 2025 Highlight Optimism Amid Anticipated Trump Presidency

A collection of major Wall Street firms, including JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America, has unveiled their projections for the S&P 500 in 2025. Collectively, these financial institutions predict that the U.S. stock market will reach new record highs next year, buoyed by expectations of a favorable economic environment under a potential Donald Trump presidency, according to Yahoo! Finance.

Among the firms, Wells Fargo stands out with the most optimistic forecast, projecting that the S&P 500 could soar to 7,007 by the end of 2025. Christopher Harvey, an equity strategist at Wells Fargo, expressed confidence in a note to investors, stating, “On balance, we expect the Trump Administration to usher in a macro environment that is increasingly favorable for stocks at a time when the Fed will be slowly reducing rates. In short, a backdrop where equities continue to rally.”

Harvey attributed this anticipated growth to several factors, including robust corporate profits, faster-than-expected economic expansion, and a regulatory landscape that supports businesses. Summarizing the outlook, he noted, “2025 is likely to be a solid-to-strong year.”

Other Wall Street players, while slightly less bullish, share the general optimism. Yardeni Research and Deutsche Bank have set their sights on the S&P 500 climbing to 7,000 next year. Meanwhile, HSBC and BMO Capital Markets are forecasting the index to reach 6,700.

Several firms have adopted more conservative estimates. Bank of America anticipates the S&P 500 rising to 6,666 by the end of 2025. Similarly, RBC Capital Markets and Barclays have set a target of 6,600 for the index.

Further down the spectrum, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs all predict that the S&P 500 will hit 6,500 within the next 12 months. UBS offers the most reserved forecast, with an expected peak of 6,400 for the index in 2025.

The diversity in these projections reflects varying expectations about the interplay of economic, political, and regulatory factors. While all firms foresee gains in the S&P 500, the range of predictions highlights the complexities of assessing market trajectories in a dynamic environment.

India’s Billionaires Witness Record Wealth Surge, Sparking Debate on Economic Disparities

India’s billionaire community saw an unprecedented 42% growth in their wealth in 2024, bringing their total fortune to over $905 billion. This surge positioned India as the country with the third-largest concentration of billionaire wealth worldwide, trailing only the United States and China, according to the UBS Billionaire Ambitions Report.

Over the last decade, the number of billionaires in India has more than doubled, rising to 185 as of April 2024. Their collective wealth increased by an impressive 263% during this period, marking a significant shift in the global wealth distribution landscape. The report attributed this phenomenal rise to the crucial role played by family-owned businesses, which have been pivotal in propelling India’s economic growth.

India’s billionaire success story spans diverse sectors, including pharmaceuticals, educational technology, financial technology, and food delivery. Many of the enterprises driving this growth are family-run and publicly listed companies. These businesses have not only strengthened the country’s economic foundations but also contributed substantially to the creation of wealth within the billionaire community over the past decade.

While billionaire wealth globally has experienced a slowdown in growth in recent years, India stands out as a notable exception. Factors fueling India’s wealth creation include a conducive economic environment, increasing urbanization, and robust growth in the manufacturing sector. Analysts have also pointed to key economic reforms introduced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government as a significant factor behind India’s emergence as the world’s fifth-largest economy. With these favorable conditions in place, experts predict that the number of billionaire entrepreneurs in India will continue to rise in the next decade.

However, the sharp growth in wealth among India’s richest has also sparked concerns about the widening economic disparity in the country. This issue has become a focal point of public debate, as critics argue that the benefits of India’s economic success are not being distributed equitably across the population.

Globally, billionaire wealth increased by 121% between 2015 and 2024, reaching a cumulative total of $14 trillion. This growth significantly outpaced the MSCI ACWI Index, highlighting the financial resilience of the world’s wealthiest individuals. Over the same period, the number of billionaires worldwide grew from 1,757 in 2015 to 2,682 in 2024. Despite this expansion, the pace of wealth growth has noticeably slowed since 2020, averaging just 1% annually in recent years. This is in stark contrast to the 10% annual growth rate recorded between 2015 and 2020.

The UBS report’s findings underscore the contrasting fortunes of billionaires globally and in India. While the global billionaire community faces a deceleration in wealth accumulation, India’s economic dynamics have propelled its wealthiest citizens into a league of their own. As this trend continues, the country’s policymakers and business leaders will need to address the economic imbalances that have sparked concerns over inequality.

Kerala Police Register FIRs Against Keralites for Defaulting on Kuwait Bank Loans

The Kerala Police have initiated legal action by filing ten First Information Reports (FIRs) against Keralites who left Kuwait after obtaining loans and failing to repay them.

In total, about 1,425 individuals from Kerala, including approximately 700 nurses, have defaulted on loans amounting to around Rs 700 crore. These individuals, who had moved to Kuwait, have since relocated to other countries, leaving their debts unpaid.

A team of officials from Kuwait recently visited Kerala’s capital city and held extensive discussions with senior Kerala Police officials. Following these discussions, a decision was made to register cases against those who left Kuwait without settling their loans. Based on these complaints, Kerala Police have now registered ten FIRs, and the investigation is being spearheaded by an Inspector General of Police.

Of the ten FIRs, cases have been lodged in Kottayam and Ernakulam districts. A significant case has been filed at the Kumarakom police station in Kottayam district, with the complainant identified as Kuwaiti national Muhammad Abdul Vassey Kamran. The loans in question were provided by the Consumer Credit Department of the Gulf Bank, Kuwait, located on Mubarak-Al Kabeer Street in Safat, Kuwait.

The issue came to light in 2022 when the Gulf Bank authorities discovered substantial defaults in loan repayments. Upon further investigation, it was revealed that many of the defaulters had already left Kuwait, relocating to countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada, or returning to different states in India.

The loans involved ranged from Rs 50 lakh to over Rs 1 crore, with the defaulters benefitting from Kuwait’s favorable currency exchange rate. Currently, one Kuwaiti Dinar (KD) is equivalent to Rs 275, making it the highest-valued currency in the world. By contrast, one US Dollar equals Rs 89.

Authorities are now working to track down the defaulters and take appropriate legal action to recover the outstanding amounts.

U.S. Economic Supremacy Set to Expand with AI Advancements, but Inequality Looms

The United States is poised to strengthen its economic dominance over other nations in the coming two decades, driven by rapid advancements in technology and science. However, this progress may come at the cost of widening inequality within its borders, according to Gad Levanon, the chief economist at The Burning Glass Institute.

In his recent forecast, Levanon highlighted that American-led developments in artificial intelligence (AI) are expected to significantly boost worker productivity and drive economic growth in the U.S. at a pace much faster than most other developed nations. He pointed out that these advancements will likely widen the gap between the U.S. and its global competitors in economic and technological leadership.

“Generative AI represents more than a gradual improvement in technology—it is a significant leap forward,” Levanon noted. He emphasized that the transformative potential of AI will extend beyond merely enhancing existing systems. It is expected to accelerate research and development across industries, paving the way for groundbreaking innovations in science and other domains.

The United States is uniquely positioned to reap the largest benefits from these advancements due to its unparalleled dominance in the tech sector and its entrepreneurial business environment. High-paying jobs in the U.S. are predicted to attract top talent from across the globe, further fueling innovation and economic growth.

China and India are also projected to emerge as major beneficiaries of the AI revolution, according to Levanon.

While the economic benefits of AI will be significant, they are unlikely to be evenly distributed across the U.S. population. Levanon cautioned that much of the resulting wealth will be concentrated among tech investors and business leaders, particularly those based on the West Coast. “The increase in wealth will be disproportionately concentrated,” he said.

Moreover, the rise of AI is expected to impact white-collar workers more severely than their blue-collar counterparts. Levanon explained that AI will likely eliminate a substantial number of jobs currently held by individuals with college degrees. On the other hand, workers in skilled trades such as electricians, plumbers, and sawmill operators are likely to fare better. Their roles are less susceptible to automation, and ongoing labor shortages in these fields could lead to increased wages.

“As a result, the college premium, particularly for graduates of lower-ranked institutions, is likely to decline,” Levanon predicted.

Regional disparities within the U.S. could also deepen as a result of AI-driven economic changes. The West Coast, already a hub for technological innovation, is expected to emerge as the biggest winner, Levanon noted. In contrast, regions like the Midwest, which have historically relied on manufacturing, may fall further behind in terms of economic prosperity.

Levanon stressed that one of the most significant challenges for policymakers in the next 20 years will be ensuring that economic growth translates into widespread improvements in living standards for all Americans. Without deliberate intervention, the benefits of AI could remain concentrated among a small segment of the population, exacerbating existing inequalities.

In conclusion, while the U.S. is set to maintain and expand its global economic leadership through technological advancements, the path ahead requires careful navigation to address the domestic challenges of inequality and uneven regional development. The government will play a critical role in ensuring that the promise of AI leads to broad-based prosperity rather than deepening divides.

NYC Tops the List as the Richest City in the World

Around the globe, many cities are renowned for their prosperity, offering vibrant business environments and luxurious lifestyles. However, which city truly stands as the pinnacle of wealth? According to a recent study, New York City has claimed the title of the richest city in the world.

“The Big Apple is the financial center of the USA, and the wealthiest city in the world by several measures,” states a report by Henley & Partners, which analyzed numerous factors to rank the wealthiest cities globally. The report highlights New York’s iconic Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, noted for its exclusivity, and emphasizes that the city is home to the two largest stock exchanges by market capitalization: the NYSE and Nasdaq. The combined wealth of New York City’s residents surpasses $3 trillion, a figure that exceeds the total wealth of many major G20 countries.

The study reveals that New York City is home to nearly 350,000 millionaires, representing a staggering 48% growth over the past decade. Additionally, the city boasts 744 centi-millionaires—individuals with a net worth exceeding $100 million—and 60 billionaires. These statistics underscore New York’s status as a magnet for wealth and high-net-worth individuals.

In addition to New York, other U.S. cities featured prominently in the top 10 list of the world’s richest cities, including the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles. The full ranking by Henley & Partners is as follows:

  1. New York
  2. The Bay Area
  3. Tokyo
  4. Singapore
  5. London
  6. Los Angeles
  7. Paris
  8. Sydney
  9. Hong Kong
  10. Beijing

This list showcases the global distribution of wealth and the influence of cities that serve as financial powerhouses, innovation hubs, and cultural epicenters.

Indian Rupee Suffers Its Worst Month in Eight as Dollar Strengthens Post-Trump Win

The Indian rupee ended November with its most significant monthly loss in eight months, primarily impacted by Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election, which spurred a surge in the dollar and U.S. bond yields, alongside continued foreign portfolio outflows.

On Friday, the rupee closed at 84.4825 against the dollar, nearly unchanged for the day but hovering near its record low of 84.5075 reached the previous week. Over the course of the month, the currency depreciated by nearly 0.5%, marking its steepest monthly decline since March.

The dollar has strengthened, and U.S. yields have risen notably following Trump’s win in the November 5 election. This trend has adversely affected emerging market assets. The dollar index climbed by 2% in November, while the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield peaked at 4.50% earlier in the month, the highest level since July.

In November, foreign investors sold more than $1.7 billion worth of Indian stocks and bonds, adding to the $11.5 billion net outflow recorded in October. Despite these pressures, the rupee managed to outperform many of its regional counterparts, primarily due to the proactive measures by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

The RBI has actively intervened in various markets to support the rupee, including selling dollars in the spot, futures, and non-deliverable forward markets. Furthermore, the central bank has urged banks to curtail speculative trading against the currency and has intensified monitoring of their foreign exchange activities.

Market participants anticipate the RBI will maintain its firm stance to protect the rupee, permitting only a controlled and gradual depreciation.

Looking ahead, emerging market currencies, including the rupee, could remain under pressure as Trump’s administration prepares to take office in January. Investors are keenly awaiting details of his policies, particularly regarding trade tariffs, which could significantly impact global markets.

“We believe the Indian rupee and IGB (Indian government bonds) would be the most resilient assets in Asia under the Trump presidency,” stated analysts at Societe Generale in a note.

On Friday, Asian currencies generally benefited from a softer dollar. However, the rupee failed to gain traction due to persistent dollar demand from foreign banks, according to traders.

This complex interplay of global economic factors and domestic interventions has placed the rupee in a challenging position, reflecting broader uncertainties in the emerging market landscape.

Senapathy Gopalakrishnan: Infosys Co-Founder Who Outshines Narayan Murthy in Wealth

Indian billionaires are constantly in the limelight for their impressive wealth and entrepreneurial accomplishments. As per the Hurun India Rich List 2024, the country now boasts 334 billionaires, a notable increase of 75 from the previous year, with a collective net worth of ₹159 lakh crore. While Narayan Murthy is often the focal point when discussing Infosys’s founders, one of his co-founders, Senapathy Gopalakrishnan, has quietly surpassed him in net worth. Gopalakrishnan’s wealth currently stands at ₹38,500 crore, edging out Murthy’s ₹36,600 crore and earning him the distinction of being Infosys’s wealthiest co-founder.

Infosys, founded in 1981 by Murthy alongside six other visionaries—NS Raghavan, Ashok Arora, Nandan Nilekani, SD Shibulal, K Dinesh, and Senapathy Gopalakrishnan—has grown into one of India’s IT powerhouses. Today, the company’s revenue reaches $18.2 billion (₹1,51,762 crore as of 2023), a far cry from its modest beginnings when it was launched with an investment of just ₹10,000 provided by Sudha Murthy, Narayan Murthy’s wife. Despite his substantial contribution to Infosys’s success, Gopalakrishnan has largely stayed out of the public spotlight. However, his wealth now places him ahead of Murthy, underscoring his significant achievements.

Who Is Senapathy Gopalakrishnan?

At 69, Senapathy Gopalakrishnan has established himself as a crucial figure in Infosys’s journey. His tenure as CEO and Managing Director from 2007 to 2011 marked a period of significant growth and innovation for the company. From 2011 to 2014, he served as Vice Chairman, continuing to contribute to the company’s strategy and leadership. Following his departure from Infosys, Gopalakrishnan turned his focus toward fostering entrepreneurship.

He now chairs Axilor Ventures, an organization that provides support to early-stage startups. Under his guidance, Axilor Ventures has invested in several promising startups, such as GoodHome, Cogoport, and EnKash, demonstrating his knack for identifying and nurturing innovation. His extensive experience in technology and business makes him a sought-after mentor for budding entrepreneurs.

A Foundation in Education and Innovation

Born in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, Gopalakrishnan’s early years were marked by academic excellence. He attended the Government Model Boys Higher Secondary School and went on to earn his master’s degree in Physics and Computer Science from IIT Madras. His strong grounding in both these disciplines significantly influenced his approach to technology and problem-solving, ultimately making him a key player in Infosys’s technological advancements.

His academic background not only equipped him with technical expertise but also instilled in him a disciplined and innovative mindset. This combination proved invaluable in navigating Infosys through the rapidly evolving IT landscape during his leadership years.

Beyond Business: Philanthropy and Education

Gopalakrishnan’s influence extends well beyond the corporate world. Together with his wife, Sudha Gopalakrishnan, he leads the Pratiksha Trust, an initiative dedicated to advancing brain research. The trust’s work reflects the couple’s commitment to improving healthcare and scientific understanding in India.

In addition to their philanthropic efforts, Gopalakrishnan is actively involved in shaping India’s education and research landscape. He serves on the Board of Trustees of the Chennai Mathematical Institute and sits on the Governing Councils of IIT Madras and IIT Bangalore. His contributions in these roles have helped foster academic excellence and innovation in the country.

Recognition and Legacy

For his contributions to the IT industry and philanthropy, Gopalakrishnan has received several accolades. Most notably, he was honored with the Padma Bhushan, India’s third-highest civilian award, in 2011. This recognition underscores the impact of his work both in business and in advancing societal progress.

As one of the founding pillars of Infosys, Senapathy Gopalakrishnan’s journey is a testament to how vision, hard work, and a commitment to innovation can create lasting success. While he may not be as high-profile as Narayan Murthy, his wealth and accomplishments speak volumes about his enduring legacy.

Indian Rupee Struggles Amid Dollar Strength and Equity Outflows

The Indian rupee is facing significant challenges, hovering near historic lows as it battles against a strong US dollar and weakened domestic equities. The rupee recently dipped to around 84.4050 against the dollar, narrowly missing its record low of 84.4125 set just the day before, highlighting a tough period for India’s currency.

This struggle of the rupee is part of a larger global economic shift, characterized by the dominance of the dollar, which has strengthened due to rising US bond yields and the expectations surrounding potential new tax and trade policies in the US. These developments are further putting pressure on emerging market currencies, including the rupee, and are in stark contrast to movements seen in other Asian currencies, such as the Chinese yuan, which showed a slight increase of 0.1%. According to analysts at DBS Bank, the decline in the rupee can primarily be attributed to a robust dollar and ongoing outflows of foreign investments. In fact, foreign investors have sold off a substantial $3 billion worth of Indian stocks this month, following a more significant $11 billion in sales during October.

Despite these unfavorable conditions, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has taken proactive measures to stabilize the rupee. The RBI’s strategic interventions are aimed at managing the rupee’s decline in a way that reduces volatility and ensures that the currency’s slide is gradual. This has resulted in the rupee’s dip of just 0.4% this month, a sign of its relatively better performance when compared to many other currencies in the region.

The continued weakness of the rupee raises questions for market watchers, as it highlights the broader challenges emerging economies face in the wake of the dollar’s strength. For the Indian economy, the weakening rupee is both a symptom and a consequence of broader economic forces at play globally. One of the key drivers of the rupee’s struggles has been the shift in global market sentiment. Investor caution has led to significant outflows from Indian equities, with foreign investors increasingly pulling out their capital, seeking safer investments amid uncertainty. While foreign investment outflows put pressure on the rupee, the Indian central bank’s actions have provided some relief, with experts noting that the currency’s resilience in the face of these challenges is notable.

Looking ahead, market participants are keenly watching the upcoming US consumer inflation data, which could significantly influence Federal Reserve policy. These economic data points will not only shape the future course of US monetary policy but could also have a wider impact on global currency markets, including the Indian rupee. The ongoing situation underscores the interconnectedness of global financial systems and the ripple effects that policy decisions in major economies like the US can have on emerging markets.

This is a crucial moment for investors and policymakers alike, as the strength of the dollar continues to reshape markets across the world. The rupee’s struggle is not just a local issue but part of a larger, more complex global economic shift. The interplay of currency fluctuations, global investment patterns, and shifts in policy will likely define the economic landscape for months, if not years, to come.

The decline of the rupee, exacerbated by large-scale foreign stock divestments, paints a picture of the vulnerability of emerging market currencies, which are heavily influenced by changes in the US economy. These pressures are a reminder of the fragile nature of these markets, where the global economic climate can have immediate and far-reaching effects. Moreover, as the US continues to shape the global financial environment, emerging economies like India will need to navigate these choppy waters, relying on strategic interventions and adaptive policies to shield their currencies from further damage.

While the RBI has shown resilience in managing the rupee’s slide, its task is far from easy. The global shift towards a stronger dollar means that emerging market currencies, including the rupee, will continue to face headwinds. At the same time, the ongoing economic changes in the US, driven by factors like bond yields and inflation expectations, are setting the stage for more potential volatility in global currency markets.

This ongoing currency turmoil is of critical importance for financial markets worldwide, as it affects not just currency values but also investor behavior and international trade. The strengthening of the dollar is already causing ripple effects, and the future course of monetary policy in the US will likely exacerbate or alleviate these pressures. Market participants are now closely watching the next set of economic data, particularly US inflation figures, which could provide more clarity on the Federal Reserve’s approach and potentially alter the trajectory of the rupee and other emerging market currencies.

The current situation of the Indian rupee illustrates a broader global economic trend where the dollar’s dominance is reshaping financial markets, particularly in emerging economies. The rupee’s struggle is indicative of the challenges faced by many currencies worldwide, with investor caution, foreign equity outflows, and the looming specter of US policy changes all contributing to the pressure. The Reserve Bank of India’s efforts to manage the rupee’s decline offer a measure of stability, but the future remains uncertain as global economic conditions continue to evolve.

As the dollar continues to rise and pressures mount on emerging market currencies, including the rupee, it’s clear that the global economic order is undergoing significant changes. Policymakers and investors alike will need to stay vigilant, as decisions made in major economies like the US will have a direct impact on emerging markets, shaping the course of global finance in the years to come.

Billionaire Fortunes Surge Following U.S. Election, Led by Musk’s Record Gains

Following Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election, eight of America’s wealthiest individuals saw unprecedented gains. According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, these top billionaires collectively gained $63.5 billion on Wednesday. While nine Americans and one Frenchman hold the highest positions on the list, the only American billionaire who saw a decline was Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. His net worth fell by $80.9 million, leaving him at $202 billion on Thursday, November 7. The sole billionaire outside the U.S. within the top ten, French businessman Bernard Arnault, also experienced a decrease in wealth, with a $2.8 billion drop in net worth.

According to Bloomberg’s Billionaires Index, here’s how the wealth of America’s richest surged and who benefited the most:

  1. Elon Musk

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk was the biggest gainer, with his wealth soaring by $26.5 billion. Musk’s net worth now stands at $290 billion, attributed in part to his support for Trump. Trump has even suggested Musk could hold a position in his administration. In an October rally in New York, Musk was prominently seen supporting Trump as he rallied alongside him at Madison Square Garden.

  1. Jeff Bezos

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos saw a $7.14 billion increase, bringing his net worth to $228 billion. This boost came just days after Bezos explained his choice not to have The Washington Post, which he owns, endorse Vice President Kamala Harris. According to CNN, Bezos’ financial rise aligns with this decision to remain politically neutral.

  1. Larry Ellison

Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, another prominent Trump supporter, saw his fortune grow by around $10 billion, taking him to a net worth of $193 billion as of Thursday.

  1. Bill Gates

Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, saw a significant rise in his wealth, with a $1.82 billion increase, reaching $159 billion. The Bloomberg Billionaires Index reported Gates’ net worth was buoyed despite him not endorsing a candidate this election cycle.

  1. Larry Page

Former Alphabet CEO and Google co-founder Larry Page also saw a notable increase in his wealth, gaining $5.53 billion. His net worth now stands at $158 billion.

  1. Sergey Brin

Google co-founder Sergey Brin’s wealth rose by $5.17 billion, boosting his net worth to $149 billion.

  1. Warren Buffett

Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett’s net worth saw a $7.58 billion increase, rising to $148 billion. Known for his long-standing support of Democratic causes, Buffett did not endorse any candidate this election.

  1. Steve Ballmer

Steve Ballmer, former CEO of Microsoft, experienced a $2.81 billion increase in wealth, bringing his net worth to $146 billion. Like Gates and Buffett, Ballmer also refrained from openly supporting a candidate this year but has historically backed Democratic initiatives.

These billionaires, despite varying political leanings, benefited collectively as the Bloomberg Billionaires Index calculated an overall gain of $63.5 billion in their net worth. This significant rise comes amid Trump’s confirmed win in the election, with U.S. media projecting he will secure over 300 electoral votes. In December, Trump is expected to be officially recognized as the next U.S. president after winning the popular vote on November 5.

Though Elon Musk has been vocal in his support for Trump, many of these billionaires, including Gates, Ballmer, Page, Brin, and Buffett, have historically endorsed Democratic causes or candidates.

Indian Rupee Ends Near Record Low Against Dollar Amid Election Uncertainty, RBI Intervention Limits Losses

The Indian rupee closed close to its all-time low against the dollar on Thursday, experiencing pressure from ongoing equity outflows and market concerns regarding the U.S. election outcome. The central bank, however, intervened actively throughout October, keeping the local currency within a relatively narrow range.

On Thursday, the rupee settled at 84.0750 per U.S. dollar, showing only a slight change from Wednesday’s close of 84.0775. The Indian currency market will observe a public holiday on Friday, pausing trade. Earlier in Friday’s session, the rupee briefly touched an unprecedented low of 84.0950. Over the course of October, the currency depreciated by about 0.3%, fluctuating between 83.79 and the record low of 84.0950.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) took consistent measures to limit the rupee’s decline, leading to the currency’s relative outperformance compared to other major Asian currencies, particularly as the U.S. presidential election looms on November 5. By selling dollars almost daily over the past two weeks, the RBI aimed to moderate the depreciation and maintain stability.

Analysts have indicated that the election’s outcome could significantly impact the dollar and, by extension, Asian currencies. Should Republican candidate Donald Trump secure a victory, the dollar index could see an increase, U.S. Treasury yields may rise, and Asian currencies could weaken as a result. According to Reuters, the RBI has prepared to handle any potential surge in foreign fund outflows and prevent a sharp drop in the rupee in the event of such an outcome.

While the central bank’s active defense of the rupee has shielded it from major volatility, analysts have cautioned that this could lead to a lack of vigilance among importers and exporters regarding global market risks. “The RBI’s actions could lead to complacency and major debacle in the event of any global turmoil or a black swan event,” commented Jayram Krishnamurthy, co-founder of Almus Risk Consulting.

The rupee has also been weighed down by continuous foreign outflows from Indian equities. This month has seen significant equity withdrawals from foreign investors, driven by high valuations in Indian markets relative to other options and China’s ongoing stimulus plans. Foreign investors have pulled nearly $11 billion from Indian equities in October, a marked reversal from the $7 billion net inflows recorded in September.

Top 10 Strongest Currencies Globally: An Overview of Value and Stability

With 180 currencies recognized globally by the United Nations and used across 195 countries, a currency’s value and strength don’t always align with its popularity. Currency strength, in essence, represents its purchasing power — the ability to acquire goods, services, or foreign currency. The analysis of a currency’s power considers factors such as the amount of goods and services it can buy domestically and its value when exchanged internationally.

A deeper dive into a currency’s strength assesses its performance based on both local and global influences. Key determinants include foreign exchange market dynamics, inflation, economic growth, policies from the respective central bank, and the nation’s economic stability. “Currency strength is a complex metric, influenced by a combination of domestic factors and the currency’s status in the global marketplace,” said one expert on currency valuation.

Outlined here are the world’s top ten strongest currencies, updated with their values as of October 29, 2024.

The World’s 10 Strongest Currencies

Currency & Symbol Value In Rs Value in USD Country
#1 Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD) 274.20 3.26 Kuwait
#2 Bahraini Dinar (BHD) 223.11 2.65 Bahrain
#3 Omani Rial (OMR) 218.39 2.60 Oman
#4 Jordanian Dinar (JOD) 118.60 1.41 Jordan
#5 Gibraltar Pound (GIP) 109.00 1.29 Gibraltar
#6 British Pound (GBP) 109.00 1.29 United Kingdom
#7 Cayman Island Dollar (KYD) 100.86 1.20 Cayman Islands
#8 Swiss Franc (CHF) 97.13 1.16 Switzerland
#9 Euro (EUR) 90.87 1.08 Multiple countries in the Eurozone (e.g., Germany, France, Italy
#10 United States Dollar (USD) 84.08 1.00  United States

This list ranks currencies based on their exchange rate per US dollar and value in Indian Rupees, revealing some of the factors that have helped these currencies attain prominence.

  1. Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)

Introduced on April 1, 1961, the Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD) stands as the world’s highest-valued currency. Kuwait’s economy is remarkably stable, driven by its vast oil resources and tax-free regime. The strong demand for the Kuwaiti Dinar has consistently elevated its value. Popular among Indian expatriates, the KWD to INR exchange rate garners particular attention. “Kuwait’s economic stability and reliance on high-demand oil exports make the KWD one of the most valuable currencies,” an industry analyst noted.

  1. Bahraini Dinar (BHD)

The Bahraini Dinar (BHD), introduced on October 7, 1965, serves as Bahrain’s official currency and is pegged to the US dollar. Bahrain’s economy leans heavily on oil exports, which bolsters the Dinar’s strength. An expatriate community, including many Indians, amplifies its circulation. The Bahraini Dinar ranks as the second strongest currency worldwide. According to an economist, “Bahrain’s reliance on a fixed exchange system with the US Dollar helps maintain the Bahraini Dinar’s high value.”

  1. Omani Rial (OMR)

The Omani Rial (OMR) was introduced in 1970, replacing the Indian Rupee as Oman’s official currency. Oman’s economy is deeply rooted in oil, and the Rial’s peg to the US dollar has established its high value. Ranking third globally, the Rial is used exclusively within Oman. “Oman’s peg to the US Dollar and strong oil-based economy supports the Rial’s value,” remarked an economist on the currency’s position.

  1. Jordanian Dinar (JOD)

In use since 1949, the Jordanian Dinar (JOD) replaced the Palestinian pound and has maintained high value, largely due to Jordan’s fixed exchange rate policy and diversified economic base. Positioned as the fourth strongest currency globally, the Dinar reflects Jordan’s commitment to economic stability. “The fixed exchange rate policy of Jordan lends strength to the Dinar, despite a smaller economy,” noted a currency analyst.

  1. Gibraltar Pound (GIP)

Established in 1872, the Gibraltar Pound (GIP) operates on par with the British Pound Sterling, reflecting Gibraltar’s status as a British Overseas Territory. Tourism and e-gaming are key sectors of Gibraltar’s economy, sustaining the GIP’s strength. Ranking fifth among the world’s strongest currencies, the Gibraltar Pound’s value is largely due to its direct link with the British Pound. As an economic expert noted, “The Gibraltar Pound benefits directly from its fixed rate with the British Pound, which keeps it stable.”

  1. British Pound (GBP)

Dating back to the 8th century, the British Pound (GBP) remains one of the oldest currencies and has long been a key player in global finance. Used not only in Great Britain but also in other territories, the British Pound ranks as the sixth strongest currency worldwide. The financial powerhouse status of London and the UK’s active role in global trade elevate the Pound’s standing. “The GBP is not only one of the world’s strongest currencies but a crucial component of international finance,” explained a financial expert.

  1. Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)

Adopted in 1972, the Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD) replaced the Jamaican Dollar and serves as the official currency of the Cayman Islands. Known as the seventh strongest currency globally, the KYD’s high value stems from the Cayman Islands’ reputation as a major financial hub. “The Cayman Islands’ tax-free status and financial sector make the KYD one of the world’s most valuable currencies,” highlighted an economist.

  1. Swiss Franc (CHF)

The Swiss Franc (CHF), introduced on May 7, 1850, is Switzerland’s official currency, also used in Liechtenstein. The Swiss Franc is respected globally for its stability and serves as the eighth strongest currency in the world. Switzerland’s stable economy and banking sector underlie the CHF’s value. “Switzerland’s economic resilience and financial market make the Swiss Franc a global favorite,” said a financial consultant.

  1. Euro (EUR)

The Euro (EUR), introduced on January 1, 1999, is the currency of the Eurozone, which consists of 19 European Union member states. Recognized as the second-largest reserve currency, the Euro ranks ninth in strength worldwide. “The Euro’s widespread use in the Eurozone enhances its stability and value,” stated an economist. The Euro is widely traded globally, reflecting its impact on international finance.

  1. United States Dollar (USD)

Although the United States Dollar (USD) ranks tenth among the strongest currencies, it remains the most widely traded and the primary global reserve currency. First introduced on April 2, 1792, the USD is also used officially in 11 other countries. “Despite ranking tenth in strength, the US Dollar’s extensive global use cements its significance,” commented a currency analyst. The Dollar’s broad acceptance and its dominance in international trade solidify its role in the global economy.

This analysis highlights the top ten most valuable currencies, each shaped by unique national policies, economic foundations, and external influences. While their relative positions may shift, these currencies are likely to remain significant players in the global economy for the foreseeable future.

Rupee Struggles Between Softer Dollar and Persistent Equity Outflows, Drops to Record Low

The Indian rupee faces opposing pressures as it concludes a volatile week. On one side, the dollar has softened, offering potential relief, but on the other, heavy foreign equity outflows are exerting downward pressure on the currency. Over the past few days, the rupee has traded within an exceptionally narrow range of three paisa, setting a record for the year. During this time, it also fell to a new lifetime low.

According to the 1-month non-deliverable forward (NDF), the rupee is expected to open at a stable rate of around 84.0775 in the latest session, following a steady pattern from the day prior. This stability has largely been influenced by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which has actively intervened to support the rupee amidst rising U.S. Treasury yields and persistent equity outflows from Indian markets.

The RBI has intervened multiple times this week, offering support through public sector banks to curb the rupee’s decline. The central bank’s involvement has notably offset the impact of foreign money flowing out of Indian equities. Despite the ongoing equity outflows, this consistent intervention has helped prevent any significant depreciation in the rupee’s value.

On Tuesday, the rupee reached its lowest point to date, at 84.0825, but this milestone did not trigger a subsequent, sharp decline.

“We can keep debating whether what the RBI is doing is right or wrong and whether there will be a price to pay down the road,” commented a currency trader at a local bank. “The reality of the matter right now is that RBI’s chokehold, which has been there for a long time, will remain.” The trader anticipates a quiet trading day, with the rupee expected to hold within the 84.07-84.08 range.

Dollar Pullback and Foreign Equity Outflows

On Wednesday, the dollar index fell by 0.4% and continued to trend slightly lower in Asian markets, taking a brief respite after a strong rally. Despite this minor dip, confidence in the Federal Reserve’s cautious approach to rate cuts, along with the prospects of a Donald Trump victory in the upcoming election, continues to bolster the dollar’s value.

Meanwhile, foreign equity outflows from Indian markets are expected to exceed $10 billion this month—a significant reversal from the $7 billion in net inflows witnessed in September. This shift in capital flows is intensifying the rupee’s struggle against depreciation, with foreign investors increasingly withdrawing from Indian equities. According to recent data from the National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL), foreign investors sold a net $593.6 million worth of Indian shares on October 23, highlighting the extent of outflows as market sentiment shifts.

Key Market Indicators

Among the primary market indicators, the 1-month non-deliverable rupee forward stood at 84.18, while the onshore 1-month forward premium was at 10.5 paisa. The dollar index was down to 104.02, while Brent crude futures saw a slight increase of 0.4%, trading at $74.7 per barrel. The 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield held steady at 4.2%, reflecting stable demand for long-term government bonds amidst market uncertainty.

Kamala Harris Seen as Key to Tackling Medical Debt Crisis Amid Presidential Campaign

Patient and consumer advocates are turning to Vice President Kamala Harris as they hope she will intensify federal efforts to alleviate medical debt should she win the upcoming presidential election. Harris, the Democratic nominee, is viewed as a critical figure in safeguarding access to health insurance for Americans, which experts agree is the best protection against debt caused by medical expenses.

Under the Biden administration, strides have been made to strengthen financial protections for patients. This includes a notable proposal by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to eliminate medical debt from consumer credit reports. President Biden’s 2022 signing of the Inflation Reduction Act, which includes a $35-a-month cap on insulin for Medicare enrollees, has also helped ease some financial burdens. Additionally, bipartisan efforts across state legislatures have led to laws aimed at curbing aggressive debt collection practices.

Despite these advancements, advocates argue that there is much more the federal government could do to address the problem affecting 100 million Americans. The weight of medical debt often leads individuals to work extra jobs, lose their homes, or reduce spending on essentials like food.

“Biden and Harris have done more to tackle the medical debt crisis in this country than any other administration,” said Mona Shah, senior director of policy and strategy at Community Catalyst, a nonprofit organization leading efforts to strengthen protections against medical debt. “But there is more that needs to be done and should be a top priority for the next Congress and administration.”

However, these advocates fear that a second term for former President Donald Trump could reverse progress. During his first term, Trump and congressional Republicans attempted to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA), a move that analysts predicted would strip health coverage from millions of Americans and raise costs for those with pre-existing conditions like diabetes and cancer. Trump also promoted cheaper “skinny plans” that offered minimal coverage but left people vulnerable to significant out-of-pocket expenses if they became ill. Though Trump signed the bipartisan No Surprises Act, which shields consumers from certain surprise medical bills, his stance against the ACA and his intent to roll back the Inflation Reduction Act continue to raise concerns.

“People will face a wave of medical debt from paying premiums and prescription drug prices,” warned Anthony Wright, executive director of Families USA, a consumer group advocating for federal health protections. “Patients and the public should be concerned.”

The Trump campaign has not offered detailed plans regarding health care or medical debt in the run-up to the election. Trump has hinted at improving the ACA but has yet to provide specifics.

Harris, on the other hand, has pledged to protect the ACA and extend expanded subsidies for insurance premiums under the Inflation Reduction Act. These subsidies are set to expire next year, and Harris has voiced strong support for renewing them. Additionally, she has endorsed more government spending to purchase and cancel old medical debts. While these efforts have brought relief to hundreds of thousands, many advocates believe retiring old debts only offers a temporary solution without more systemic reforms.

“It’s a boat with a hole in it,” said Katie Berge, a lobbyist for the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. Her group was one of over 50 organizations that last year urged the Biden administration to take more aggressive steps in addressing medical debt.

“Medical debt is no longer a niche issue,” said Kirsten Sloan, a federal policy expert at the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Action Network. “It is key to the economic well-being of millions of Americans.”

One significant proposal currently in development is a set of CFPB regulations that would bar medical bills from appearing on consumer credit reports. This move could boost credit scores, making it easier for Americans to rent apartments, secure jobs, or obtain loans. Harris has expressed strong support for this initiative, stating in June that medical debt “is critical to the financial health and well-being of millions of Americans.” She added, “No one should be denied access to economic opportunity simply because they experienced a medical emergency.”

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Harris’ running mate, has also taken steps to address medical debt. Walz, who has shared that his family struggled with medical debt during his youth, signed a law in June cracking down on aggressive debt collection practices in his state.

CFPB officials expect the new regulations to be finalized early next year. However, it remains unclear whether Trump would continue supporting these protections. His administration took little action on medical debt, and congressional Republicans have long been critical of the CFPB.

If Harris prevails in the election, consumer groups hope she will push the CFPB to take even more significant measures, including stricter oversight of medical credit cards and similar financial products offered by hospitals. These products often lock patients into interest payments on top of their existing debt.

“We are seeing a variety of new medical financial products,” noted April Kuehnhoff, senior attorney at the National Consumer Law Center. “These can raise new concerns about consumer protections, and it is critical for the CFPB and other regulators to monitor these companies.”

Beyond the CFPB, advocates are calling on other federal agencies, particularly the Health and Human Services (HHS) department, to become more involved. HHS oversees billions of dollars through the Medicare and Medicaid programs, giving the federal government substantial influence over hospitals and medical providers. Yet, to date, the Biden administration has not fully leveraged this power to address medical debt.

There are signs of what could come, however. North Carolina state leaders recently won federal approval for a program requiring hospitals to help alleviate patient debt in exchange for government aid. Harris has praised this initiative, and some see it as a potential model for future federal action.

Ultimately, for patients and consumer advocates, the stakes of the 2024 election are high. Harris’ focus on expanding health protections offers hope for more comprehensive solutions to the growing medical debt crisis. On the other hand, fears loom that a Trump victory could undo many of the hard-won gains and leave millions more vulnerable to the crushing burden of medical debt.

Economists Awarded Nobel Prize for Research on Institutional Impact on National Prosperity

Three prominent economists, Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson, have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for their extensive research on how institutions shape the wealth or poverty of nations. The prize, which comes with a cash award of 11 million Swedish kronor ($1 million), was awarded to recognize their work in explaining why some countries thrive economically while others remain stagnant or impoverished.

The Nobel Committee praised the trio’s contributions to the understanding of how the rule of law and the quality of institutions play a pivotal role in determining a nation’s growth trajectory. According to the committee, “societies with a poor rule of law and institutions that exploit the population do not generate growth or change for the better.” The research conducted by Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson underscores that differences in the types of institutions governing nations are fundamental to understanding the wealth disparity between countries.

A key aspect of the laureates’ work is the exploration of how colonization impacted the development of institutions in different regions. “When Europeans colonized large parts of the globe, the institutions in those societies changed,” the committee noted. In some cases, colonial institutions were designed to exploit local populations, but in other cases, they set the stage for the development of more inclusive political and economic systems that fostered growth and stability.

The Nobel Committee highlighted the economists’ ability to show that “one explanation for differences in countries’ prosperity is the societal institutions that were introduced during colonization.” Countries that established what the laureates term “inclusive institutions” – those that respect property rights and uphold the rule of law – have generally become prosperous. In contrast, nations that developed “extractive institutions” have often struggled with prolonged economic stagnation, as these institutions tend to concentrate wealth and resources in the hands of a few elites at the expense of the broader population.

In their widely acclaimed 2012 book, *Why Nations Fail*, Acemoglu, a Turkish-American professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and Robinson, a British professor at the University of Chicago, delve deeply into this idea. They argue that political and economic institutions are at the heart of why some nations are wealthy while others remain poor. The book opens with a compelling comparison of two towns named Nogales – one in the U.S. state of Arizona and the other just across the border in Mexico’s Sonora region. The differences in prosperity between these two towns, they argue, are not due to geographical or cultural factors but instead reflect the strength and inclusiveness of the institutions governing each side.

While some economists have suggested that differences in climate, agriculture, and culture are key determinants of prosperity, Acemoglu and Robinson’s work shows that the strength of local institutions is the defining factor. In their analysis of Nogales, Arizona, they highlight how the strong institutions in the U.S. foster better living conditions and economic opportunities compared to those across the border in Mexico.

The work of these economists goes beyond historical analyses. In a more recent collaboration, Acemoglu and Johnson, a British-American professor at MIT, published *Power and Progress* in 2023. This book investigates the impact of technological advancements over the last millennium, from agricultural improvements to artificial intelligence. Their research reveals that, historically, these innovations have often benefited elites disproportionately rather than fostering widespread prosperity. The authors express concern that artificial intelligence, in particular, could exacerbate economic inequality if not managed carefully. They caution that “the current path of AI is neither good for the economy nor for democracy,” as it risks entrenching the power and wealth of a select few.

When asked about whether their research suggests that democracy leads to economic growth, Acemoglu offered a nuanced perspective. He acknowledged that their findings support the idea that democracy is generally favorable for economic development but added that democracy is “not a panacea.” He emphasized that “our argument has been that this sort of authoritarian growth is more unstable and does not generally lead to very rapid and original innovation.” His remarks reflect a cautious optimism about democracy’s potential while acknowledging its limitations.

In *Why Nations Fail*, Acemoglu and Robinson also examined China’s economic growth, predicting that it would be unsustainable due to the country’s lack of inclusive institutions. More than a decade later, Acemoglu admitted that China’s continued rapid growth, particularly in the fields of artificial intelligence and electric vehicles, has presented “a bit of a challenge” to their argument. Nevertheless, he remains skeptical that China’s authoritarian regime will be able to sustain long-term innovation and economic success. He noted that “these authoritarian regimes, for a variety of reasons, are going to have a harder time in achieving long-term, sustainable innovation outcomes.”

The economics Nobel, officially known as the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, was established in 1968 by Sweden’s central bank. Unlike the more traditional Nobel Prizes for achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine, literature, and peace, this award was not part of the original set of prizes conceived by Alfred Nobel, the Swedish industrialist and inventor of dynamite.

Last year’s Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences was awarded to Claudia Goldin, a professor at Harvard University, for her groundbreaking research on gender disparities in the labor market. Goldin used over 200 years of data to analyze how the gender pay gap has evolved. Historically, the gap was largely attributed to differences in education and occupation between men and women. However, her research showed that in more recent decades, the gender pay gap has persisted even within the same occupations, with much of the disparity emerging when women have their first child. Goldin’s work highlighted how societal structures and expectations contribute to ongoing gender inequality in the workplace.

The awarding of this year’s Nobel Prize to Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson underscores the importance of understanding how institutions, political systems, and economic structures shape the fortunes of nations. Their research offers valuable insights into the enduring impact of historical decisions on the modern global economy and the challenges faced by nations that lack inclusive institutions capable of fostering innovation and growth.

India’s Billionaires Cross $1 Trillion Milestone as Wealth Soars

India’s wealthiest individuals reached a significant achievement this year, with their combined net worth exceeding $1 trillion for the first time, according to a recent Forbes report. This milestone reflects the optimistic investor sentiment around India’s economy, driven by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s successful bid for a third consecutive term earlier in the year. This confidence has also spurred the stock market, with the BSE Sensex seeing a 30% rise over the last 12 months.

According to Forbes, India’s 100 wealthiest individuals now collectively hold a net worth of $1.1 trillion, which has more than doubled since 2019. Over the past year alone, these billionaires added $316 billion to their collective fortune, representing a staggering 40% increase.

A significant majority—more than 80%—of the individuals on this list saw a rise in their wealth, with 58 of them gaining at least $1 billion. Several of the country’s most prominent business tycoons witnessed substantial increases in their fortunes, with half a dozen adding more than $10 billion to their net worth. Together, the top five richest people in the nation contributed nearly $120 billion to the overall wealth surge.

Mukesh Ambani and Gautam Adani Lead the Way

Mukesh Ambani, chairman of Reliance Industries, retains his position as the richest person in India. His wealth grew by $27.5 billion this year, bringing his total net worth to $119.5 billion. Ambani continues to dominate the wealth rankings in the country.

Not far behind Ambani is Gautam Adani, the head of the Adani Group, whose fortune saw an even more dramatic rise. Adani’s net worth increased by $48 billion, reaching $116 billion, making him the year’s largest gainer. This marked a notable recovery for Adani, who had faced significant scrutiny following short-selling allegations by Hindenburg Research last year. His rise has been supported by strategic business moves, including placing family members in key positions within his conglomerate.

Notable Wealth Gainers

The Forbes report also highlights several other prominent business figures who have seen substantial wealth increases over the past year. Among them is Savitri Jindal, the head of the O.P. Jindal Group, who now ranks as the third-richest person in India with a net worth of $43.7 billion. Jindal’s wealth grew by $19.7 billion in just 12 months, largely driven by the company’s ventures into new sectors, including electric vehicles, through partnerships with companies like MG Motor.

Shiv Nadar, the founder of technology giant HCL, comes in fourth place with a net worth of $40.2 billion. Both Nadar and Jindal are among the six individuals who added more than $10 billion to their fortunes this year.

The pharmaceutical industry has also seen significant gains. Dilip Shanghvi, founder of Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, climbed to fifth place with a net worth of $32.4 billion, up from $19 billion last year.

Additionally, the Mehta brothers, Sudhir and Samir, of Torrent Pharmaceuticals, saw their wealth more than double to $16.3 billion, as their company pursued potential acquisitions in the healthcare sector.

A Historic Year for India’s Billionaires

The year 2024 has been a turning point for India’s richest individuals. Their collective wealth grew by 40%, from $799 billion in 2023 to $1.1 trillion this year. The 30% rise in the BSE Sensex and growing confidence in the Indian economy have played crucial roles in this dramatic increase. As per Forbes, over 80% of those on the list saw their wealth rise, with 58 individuals adding at least $1 billion to their net worth.

This year also saw the entry of several new billionaires to Forbes’ ranking. Among the four newcomers is B. Partha Saradhi Reddy, the founder of Hetero Labs, who debuted in 81st place with a net worth of $3.95 billion. Mahima Datla, who controls vaccine maker Biological E, also made her debut, taking the 100th spot with a net worth of $3.3 billion. Other new entrants include Harish Ahuja of Shahi Exports and Surender Saluja, founder of Premier Energies.

For the first time, the Godrej family’s holdings were split between two factions, resulting in separate entries on the list. The wealth threshold to enter the Forbes rankings rose to $3.3 billion this year, compared to $2.3 billion in 2023. Consequently, 11 billionaires from the previous year were pushed off the list.

India’s Top 10 Richest for 2024

As of 2024, the top 10 richest individuals in India are as follows:

  1. Mukesh Ambani: With a total net worth of $119.5 billion, Ambani continues to hold the title of India’s richest person. His wealth increased by $27.5 billion in the past year, cementing his position at the top of the list.
  1. Gautam Adani: Adani’s net worth surged by an impressive $48 billion, bringing his total to $116 billion. This remarkable recovery follows challenges posed by the Hindenburg Research allegations, and Adani is now the largest gainer of the year.
  1. Savitri Jindal: As the head of the O.P. Jindal Group, Jindal now has a net worth of $43.7 billion, a $19.7 billion increase from the previous year, making her the third-richest person in India.
  1. Shiv Nadar: The founder of HCL, Nadar’s fortune grew by $10 billion, bringing his total net worth to $40.2 billion.
  1. Dilip Shanghvi: Shanghvi, who founded Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, saw his wealth rise to $32.4 billion, marking a significant increase from $19 billion in 2023.
  1. Radhakishan Damani: The retail magnate saw his fortune grow to $31.5 billion, securing his spot among the top billionaires in India.
  1. Sunil Mittal: Mittal’s wealth increased to $30.7 billion this year, thanks to the strong performance of his telecommunications company, Bharti Enterprises.
  1. Kumar Birla: The industrialist Kumar Birla’s wealth grew to $24.8 billion, ensuring his place among India’s top 10 wealthiest individuals.
  1. Cyrus Poonawalla: Poonawalla, who controls the Serum Institute of India, one of the world’s largest vaccine makers, saw his fortune rise to $24.5 billion.
  1. The Bajaj Family: Rounding out the top 10 are the Bajaj family, whose combined wealth totals $23.4 billion, driven by their holdings in finance and automobiles.

India’s billionaires have had an exceptional year, with wealth growth reaching unprecedented levels. The outlook remains optimistic, with investor confidence in the country’s economic future continuing to drive stock market gains and fuel the fortunes of the nation’s richest individuals.

US Banks Write Off Billions in Bad Debt as Delinquencies Surge

U.S. banks are facing mounting financial pressures, as billions of dollars in bad debt are being written off in increasing amounts, a trend highlighted in the latest report from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). According to the FDIC’s Quarterly Banking Profile report, banks in the United States collectively reported $21.3 billion in net charge-offs in the second quarter of the year. This significant increase is primarily due to rising delinquencies on credit card debt and declining commercial real estate loans.

This level of net charge-offs represents the highest quarterly figure since the second quarter of 2013. It is 20 basis points higher than the same period last year, as banks and customers alike continue to contend with the effects of high inflation and rising interest rates. The burden of these economic factors is taking a toll on the financial stability of both borrowers and lenders, prompting banks to officially write off substantial portions of uncollectible debt.

Several major U.S. banks have reported alarming figures related to their own net charge-offs for the second quarter, shedding light on the severity of the situation. JPMorgan Chase, one of the nation’s largest financial institutions, disclosed that its net charge-offs reached a staggering $2.2 billion for Q2, up significantly from $1.4 billion during the same period in the previous year. This substantial increase underscores the challenges the bank is facing with delinquent accounts and souring loans.

Similarly, Wells Fargo saw a steep rise in its net charge-offs, which surged to $1.3 billion in the second quarter, up from $764 million just a year ago. Bank of America, another major player in the U.S. banking sector, also experienced a notable increase in bad debt, with its net charge-offs climbing to $1.5 billion, compared to $900 million in the same period last year.

These figures reflect a broader trend across the banking industry, as financial institutions grapple with deteriorating loan quality in the face of persistent economic challenges. The FDIC’s report highlights the fact that the overall charge-off rate for U.S. banks has now surpassed pre-pandemic levels, signaling that the financial landscape has yet to fully stabilize after the disruptions caused by COVID-19.

Credit card delinquencies, in particular, have emerged as a significant contributor to the rise in charge-offs. The FDIC report shows that the charge-off rate for credit cards reached 4.82% in the second quarter, a 13 basis-point increase from the previous quarter. This marks the highest rate of credit card charge-offs since the third quarter of 2011, a worrying sign of mounting financial stress among consumers. As credit card balances remain unpaid, banks are forced to write off larger portions of these debts, reflecting a deteriorating outlook for credit repayment.

This trend aligns with recent findings from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, which reported that the number of credit card balances that are past due reached record levels in the first quarter of this year. According to the Philadelphia Fed’s records, which date back to 2012, Q1 saw the highest level of past-due credit card balances ever recorded. This spike in delinquencies is yet another indicator of the financial strain faced by many U.S. households, as inflation and rising interest rates erode disposable income and make it increasingly difficult for borrowers to keep up with payments.

Amid these challenges, the FDIC’s report also offers a broader perspective on the financial performance of U.S. banks. Despite the rise in net charge-offs, the second quarter of 2024 saw total net income for the 4,539 FDIC-insured commercial banks and savings institutions reach $71.5 billion, representing an increase of $7.3 billion over the previous quarter. This increase in income, however, has not been sufficient to offset the growing losses tied to bad debt, particularly in the areas of credit card and commercial real estate lending.

The commercial real estate market has been another major area of concern for U.S. banks, as rising interest rates and changing work dynamics have significantly impacted the sector. Office buildings, retail spaces, and other commercial properties have struggled to maintain their value as the demand for these spaces shifts in the post-pandemic world. As businesses adapt to remote work and e-commerce trends continue to reshape the retail landscape, many commercial real estate loans have soured, contributing to the spike in charge-offs.

The surge in commercial real estate loan defaults is part of a broader trend that has seen banks become more cautious in their lending practices. With the economic outlook uncertain and inflationary pressures continuing to weigh on consumers and businesses alike, financial institutions are increasingly prioritizing risk management over expansion, leading to tighter credit conditions. As a result, fewer new loans are being issued, and existing loans are being more rigorously scrutinized.

Despite these challenges, the banking sector remains profitable, as reflected in the overall increase in net income reported by the FDIC. However, the rising number of charge-offs suggests that banks are bracing for tougher times ahead. The increase in bad debt write-offs is a clear signal that many borrowers are struggling to meet their financial obligations, a trend that could have long-term implications for both the banking industry and the broader economy.

As inflation continues to outpace wage growth and interest rates remain elevated, the financial strain on consumers is likely to persist. The Federal Reserve has signaled its commitment to fighting inflation through continued rate hikes, which could exacerbate the financial challenges faced by borrowers. Higher interest rates make borrowing more expensive, leading to higher monthly payments for everything from mortgages to credit card bills. For consumers already struggling with inflation-driven increases in the cost of living, these higher payments can quickly become unmanageable, leading to an increase in delinquencies and, ultimately, charge-offs.

The current environment presents a complex challenge for U.S. banks. On the one hand, they must navigate a landscape of rising bad debt and deteriorating loan quality. On the other hand, they continue to generate strong profits, buoyed by higher interest rates that increase the returns on loans that are still being repaid. However, if the trend of rising charge-offs continues, it could signal deeper issues within the economy, as more consumers and businesses default on their obligations.

The latest FDIC report underscores the precarious position of U.S. banks as they face rising levels of bad debt and delinquencies. Credit card and commercial real estate loans are among the hardest-hit areas, and major banks like JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America are all reporting significant increases in charge-offs. While the banking sector remains profitable, the surge in bad debt raises concerns about the long-term health of the financial system, particularly if inflation and interest rates continue to strain borrowers’ ability to repay their debts.

Warren Buffett’s Thrifty Parenting: No Handouts for His Kids Despite Billions in Wealth

Warren Buffett, one of the richest individuals globally, with a staggering net worth of $142 billion, according to Bloomberg, is well-known for his remarkable generosity. Throughout his lifetime, Buffett has donated billions to charitable causes, embodying his belief in using wealth for the greater good. However, when it comes to his children, this charitable disposition does not extend to financial handouts.

Buffett’s daughter, Susie Buffett, has shared glimpses into her father’s frugal approach to family finances over the years, which might come as a surprise to many given his immense wealth. In the HBO documentary *Becoming Warren Buffett*, Susie narrated a story that highlights her father’s thriftiness. This wasn’t the first time she had shared this experience. In 2011, *The Globe and Mail* mentioned that Susie had once asked her father for a $41,000 loan to renovate her kitchen after having a baby. Her need for a loan arose from the necessity to accommodate a high chair in the kitchen. However, instead of offering to help, Warren advised his daughter to “go to the bank like everyone else.”

In 2017, Susie revisited the story in the documentary, offering more insights into her perspective at the time. She clarified that she wasn’t asking for a free pass. “I thought I was asking for a loan. I was not asking him to give me the money,” she said, adding that her father’s refusal to lend the money took her by surprise. “I thought, oh come on, can’t you do this?” she recalled with a sense of disbelief at his reluctance.

Despite her father’s refusal, Susie reflected on the situation with humor. In a lighthearted moment, she shared with her mother how her father’s legendary frugality might leave her without support, even though he is one of the wealthiest men in the world. She joked, “I’m going to be on the cover of People magazine someday, homeless, because my dad will be like this super-rich guy, and, you know, we’ll all be wandering around.”

However, despite the occasional frustrations she might have felt, Susie was quick to dismiss the notion that her father’s behavior was driven by stinginess. “I never felt like he was cheap or whatever word you want to use for him – thrifty,” she said. Growing up in the Buffett household wasn’t about having endless luxuries, but rather, living a life that seemed quite normal, especially for the children of someone who would eventually become a billionaire. “We grew up in this very normal sort of situation … kind of the regular father-knows-best situation,” Susie explained, reflecting on her childhood.

As a kid, Susie, along with her siblings, would receive allowances, much like any other child. They would often spend their allowances quickly on candy and magazines, like many children of their age. In the documentary, she shared a humorous memory of her father’s frugality. Buffett had a slot machine in the house that his children would frequently use, but instead of them winning any money, he would simply open the back of the machine to retrieve whatever they put in.

In Susie’s view, much of Warren’s change in approach to money and life in general over the years was influenced by her mother, Susan Thompson Buffett. Susie explained that her mother played a pivotal role in softening Warren’s frugal tendencies. “He definitely has loosened up as we’ve gotten older,” she said, adding, “I think part of it is my mother. I’m sure she was just poking at him slowly for years.” This change became evident as the Buffett children grew into adults, and Warren seemed to recognize that they were unlikely to alter their ways. “Whatever we are, we are, and it’s not that bad,” Susie noted, indicating that Warren had come to terms with their personalities and his concerns about money had eased with time.

While it might seem that Warren’s stringent financial decisions could have caused friction, Susie insists that her father’s financial principles were not something to resent. Instead, she believes they shaped her and her siblings’ lives in the right way. Even when Warren refused to grant her the loan for the kitchen renovation, she didn’t harbor any long-term frustration. “I basically think he’s been right,” she reflected, showing a deep appreciation for his long-term view on managing money.

In a separate interview in 2017 with Business Insider, Susie offered further clarification on her thoughts about her father’s financial philosophy. She expressed her agreement with Warren’s stance on not giving his children large sums of money. “I actually agree with his philosophy of not dumping a bunch of money on your kids,” she said. She also defended her father from the public’s perception of his frugality, explaining that he has been far more generous than people realize. “By the way, my dad gets a bad rap for that,” Susie added, emphasizing that Warren has provided ample support for his family, even if it didn’t come in the form of massive inheritances or financial handouts.

Despite Warren’s wealth, Susie feels deeply appreciative of what her parents have given her, both financially and in terms of values. “I feel extremely grateful to have the parents I had and for what they’ve given us,” she said. Warren’s refusal to indulge his children with excessive wealth is, in her view, a rational and responsible choice. She concluded by stating that her father’s decision not to leave them billions of dollars is the right move. “Certainly, he’s not going to leave us $50 billion and shouldn’t. It would be crazy to do anything like that.”

Warren Buffett’s life philosophy, both in terms of his charitable giving and his approach to his children, reflects a balance between generosity and responsibility. While he is happy to give away vast sums to philanthropic causes, he also believes in ensuring that his children live lives where they can stand on their own two feet. This approach, while perhaps surprising to some, has undeniably shaped the Buffett family and the values they hold dear.

IMF and World Bank Reports: Global Economy Dodges Recession, But Disparities Widen Among Nations

The global economy has sidestepped the looming threat of a crippling recession, with the IMF revising its forecast for worldwide aggregate growth in 2024 to 3.2%, up from the previous 2.9% estimated in October. The IMF emphasized the remarkable resilience of the global economy, weathering various adverse shocks and “significant central bank interest rate increases aimed at restoring price stability,” with growth primarily driven by advanced economies, notably the U.S., bolstering demand. However, the IMF also highlighted a concerning trend of widening disparities between low-income developing countries and the rest of the world. According to the IMF, “A troubling development is the widening divergence between many low-income developing countries and the rest of the world. For these economies, growth is revised downward, whereas inflation is revised up.” These nations, primarily in Africa, Latin America, the Pacific islands, and Asia, have borne the brunt of the COVID-19 pandemic, experiencing substantial declines in output relative to pre-pandemic projections and facing challenges in recovery.

Additionally, these struggling economies are burdened with mounting debt service obligations, severely limiting their ability to invest in essential public goods such as education, healthcare, and social safety nets to enhance food security.

In a separate report, the World Bank, the IMF’s counterpart, highlighted a concerning trend whereby half of the world’s 75 poorest countries are experiencing a widening income gap with the wealthiest economies, marking a “historic reversal” in development. According to the World Bank Group’s Chief Economist Indermit Gill, these countries, home to a quarter of humanity, including 1.9 billion people, and 90% of those facing hunger or malnutrition, are grappling with what he terms potentially “a lost decade.” Gill lamented the lack of attention from the rest of the world, noting that many governments in these nations are paralyzed by debt distress.

Drawing attention to success stories like South Korea, China, and India, which transitioned from borrowers to economic powerhouses and now contribute to the International Development Association (IDA), the World Bank’s chief economist stressed the importance of financial support from wealthier nations to the poorest countries. He emphasized that global prosperity and peace require tapping into every reservoir of economic potential, underscoring the imperative of not turning away from a quarter of the world’s population.

The global economy has managed to evade the looming threat of a severe recession, as highlighted by the IMF’s recent adjustment of its 2024 worldwide aggregate growth forecast to 3.2%, up from the previous projection of 2.9% made in October. This positive revision underscores the remarkable resilience displayed by the global economy, which has weathered various adversities, including “significant central bank interest rate increases aimed at restoring price stability,” while largely sustaining its growth momentum. Notably, the growth has been primarily driven by advanced economies, with the United States taking the lead in bolstering demand.

Despite these encouraging signs, the IMF also sounded a note of caution regarding the widening gap between low-income developing countries and the rest of the world. According to the IMF, “A troubling development is the widening divergence between many low-income developing countries and the rest of the world. For these economies, growth is revised downward, whereas inflation is revised up.” This divergence is particularly concerning for nations in Africa, Latin America, the Pacific islands, and Asia, which have endured significant setbacks due to the COVID-19 pandemic and are currently grappling with the challenges of recovery.

Adding to their woes, these struggling economies are burdened by mounting debt obligations, severely limiting their capacity to invest in crucial public goods such as education, healthcare, and social safety nets aimed at improving food security.

In a separate report, the World Bank echoed these concerns, highlighting a troubling trend where half of the world’s 75 poorest countries are experiencing a widening income disparity with the wealthiest economies, marking a “historic reversal” in development. Chief Economist Indermit Gill emphasized the gravity of the situation, noting that these countries, home to a quarter of humanity and 90% of those facing hunger or malnutrition, are currently facing what he terms potentially “a lost decade.” Gill expressed disappointment at the lack of attention from the international community, pointing out that many governments in these nations are grappling with debt-related challenges.

Drawing attention to success stories such as South Korea, China, and India, which have transitioned from borrowers to economic powerhouses and are now contributing to the International Development Association (IDA), the World Bank’s chief economist stressed the importance of financial support from wealthier nations to the poorest countries. He emphasized that achieving global prosperity and peace necessitates leveraging every possible source of economic potential, underscoring the urgency of not ignoring a quarter of the world’s population.

Major US Banks Witness Billions in Deposit Flight Amid Economic Uncertainty

Recent data reveals significant declines in deposits at two major US banks.

Citigroup’s quarterly earnings report indicates a decrease in deposits from $1.3305 trillion in Q1 of 2023 to $1.3072 trillion in Q1 of this year, marking a notable decline of $23.3 billion over the course of 12 months. Similarly, Wells Fargo experienced a drop of $15.1 billion in deposits during the same period, with figures slipping from $1.3567 trillion in Q1 2023 to $1.3416 trillion in Q1 2024.

JPMorgan Chase reported a 7% decrease in deposits within its Consumer & Community Banking division for Q1, excluding data from its majority acquisition of First Republic Bank, which has faced financial challenges. However, the overall deposits for the firm remained steady, excluding First Republic’s contribution.

Looking ahead, JPMorgan’s chief financial officer, Jeremy Barnum, anticipates stagnant or slightly declining deposit balances as consumers seek higher returns on their cash investments. He remarked, “We expect deposit balances to be sort of flat to modestly down. So that’s a little bit of a headwind at the margin… in a world where we’ve got something like $900 billion of deposits paying effectively zero, relatively small changes in the product-level reprice can change the NII run rate by a lot.”

Meanwhile, CEO Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase issued a cautionary note, suggesting that US banks could face another crisis if the Federal Reserve opts to raise interest rates. In his annual shareholder letter, Dimon highlighted the vulnerability of banks and leveraged US firms to persistent inflationary pressures, warning of dire consequences if the Fed tightens monetary policies further.

Dimon referenced JPMorgan’s acquisition of First Republic in May 2023, following the collapse of two other regional banks, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank. He explained that the banking crisis seemed to be waning with the resolution of these three troubled banks, contingent upon stable interest rates and the absence of a severe recession.

However, Dimon underscored the potential risks associated with a significant increase in long-term interest rates, particularly if accompanied by an economic downturn. He emphasized the detrimental impact such a scenario could have on financial assets, citing a 2-percentage-point rise in rates as equivalent to a 20% reduction in asset values. Additionally, Dimon highlighted the vulnerability of certain real estate assets, particularly office properties, to the effects of recession-induced higher vacancies and widened credit spreads.

U.S. Treasury Imposes Groundbreaking Sanctions on Spyware Maker Intellexa for Targeting Officials and Activists

The Treasury Department has taken a significant step by imposing sanctions on the manufacturer of spyware utilized to target government officials, journalists, and activists. This move marks the first instance of imposing sanctions against sellers of commercial spyware, indicating a shift in discouraging the misuse of such surveillance tools.

In a statement, Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Brian E. Nelson emphasized the importance of these actions in deterring the improper use of commercial surveillance tools. He stated, “Today’s actions represent a tangible step forward in discouraging the misuse of commercial surveillance tools, which increasingly present a security risk to the United States and our citizens.”

The sanctions specifically target two individuals and five entities associated with Intellexa, a Greece-based spyware vendor, for their involvement in the development, operation, and distribution of commercial spyware technology. This technology has been utilized to target various groups, including policy experts, journalists, human rights activists, and government officials.

This move by the Treasury Department represents the first time the U.S. has sanctioned a commercial spyware entity. Commercial spyware has been under scrutiny due to its ability to collect data, access contact lists, and record information without the user’s knowledge or consent.

The sanctions imposed prevent U.S. companies and residents from engaging in business with the listed entities and individuals, which include Intellexa founder Tal Jonathan Dilian and Sara Aleksandra Fayssal Hamou, a manager within the consortium.

The Predator software developed by Intellexa Consortium has been sold to multiple governments globally, with customers paying millions of dollars for its use, according to documents disclosed by Amnesty International in 2022.

These sanctions come in the wake of President Biden’s executive order issued last March, which prohibited the use of commercial spyware within the federal government. Nelson reiterated the commitment of the United States to establish clear boundaries for the responsible development and use of such technologies while safeguarding the human rights and civil liberties of individuals worldwide. He stated, “The United States remains focused on establishing clear guardrails for the responsible development and use of these technologies while also ensuring the protection of human rights and civil liberties of individuals around the world.”

US Senate Passes $1.2 Trillion Spending Package, Averts Government Shutdown

The United States Senate has approved a $1.2 trillion spending plan to finance the US government until September, narrowly avoiding a partial government shutdown just moments before a midnight cutoff. Although the votes on numerous amendments are anticipated to persist for hours, the accord ensures uninterrupted funding for crucial government agencies. The bill is poised for President Joe Biden’s signature on Saturday, marking a significant achievement amidst challenging negotiations. Chuck Schumer, the Democratic Senate majority leader, acknowledged the difficulty of the process, stating, “It is good for the American people that we have reached a bipartisan agreement to finish the job.”

Months of contentious debates between the major political parties will finally come to a close with the passage of this legislation, effectively putting an end to the prolonged wrangling. The White House expressed confidence in Congress’s ability to swiftly pass the bill, with the Office of Management and Budget halting preparations for a shutdown in anticipation of President Biden’s imminent endorsement.

Having already secured passage in the House of Representatives by a slim margin of 286 to 134 votes, the bill encountered resistance primarily from Republicans, with 112 voting against it. The approval, narrowly exceeding the necessary two-thirds majority, saw all but 23 Democrats supporting the measure. Despite opposition from a vocal minority of conservatives, who objected to proposed increases in government spending and advocated for reforms to immigration laws, the legislation successfully made its way through Congress.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, reflecting the dissatisfaction among some Republicans, filed a motion seeking a new House Speaker, citing objections to the current Speaker’s support for the spending package. The House budget vote underscored a departure from recent trends, with a notable majority of House Republicans opposing a funding bill negotiated by their own party. This divergence from party lines signals a shift in dynamics within the legislative body.

The passage of the $1.2 trillion spending package marks a crucial milestone in ensuring the continued operation of the US government. Despite challenges and disagreements, bipartisan efforts have prevailed, demonstrating a commitment to fulfilling essential governmental functions and averting a potentially disruptive shutdown.

Study Reveals Striking Income Needed for Singles to Live Comfortably in Major U.S. Cities

Living comfortably as a single person in major U.S. metropolitan areas demands a substantial median income, averaging at $93,933, as per a recent analysis by SmartAsset. The term “comfortable” is defined within a 50/30/20 budget framework, which allocates 50% of monthly income to necessities such as housing and utilities, 30% for discretionary spending, and 20% for savings or investments. This analysis is based on extrapolations from the MIT Living Wage Calculator.

For the 25 U.S. cities with the highest cost of living, SmartAsset delineates the income requisite for comfortable living:

  1. New York City: $138,570
  2. San Jose, California: $136,739
  3. Irvine, California: $126,797
  4. Santa Ana, California: $126,797
  5. Boston: $124,966
  6. San Diego: $122,803
  7. Chula Vista, California: $122,803
  8. San Francisco: $119,558
  9. Seattle: $119,392
  10. Oakland, California: $118,768
  11. Arlington, Virginia: $117,686
  12. Newark, New Jersey: $116,646
  13. Jersey City, New Jersey: $116,646
  14. Long Beach, California: $114,691
  15. Anaheim, California: $114,691
  16. Honolulu: $111,904
  17. Los Angeles: $110,781
  18. Aurora, Colorado: $110,115
  19. Portland, Oregon: $110,032
  20. Riverside, California: $109,408
  21. Atlanta: $107,453
  22. Sacramento, California: $104,790
  23. Raleigh, North Carolina: $102,752
  24. Gilbert, Arizona: $102,752
  25. Glendale, Arizona: $102,752

New York City tops the list with a requirement of $138,570 for a single person to live comfortably, while Houston ranks the lowest among major U.S. cities examined, necessitating $75,088.

The analysis reveals that major coastal cities, including Los Angeles, Honolulu, San Francisco, Seattle, and Boston, demand incomes exceeding $110,000 for single individuals to live comfortably. These cities are known for their high living costs, particularly in housing, as reported by The Council for Community and Economic Research.

California’s housing shortage exacerbates the situation, contributing to 11 of its cities being among the most expensive places to live, thus necessitating higher salaries. While employers in high-cost cities often offer above-average salaries to attract and retain talent, housing expenses can challenge the maintenance of a 50/30/20 budget.

In New York City, for instance, a third of residents allocate half their income to rent, according to the Community Service Society. Residents often adjust other aspects of their budgets, such as foregoing homeownership or reducing discretionary spending, to cope with high housing costs.

Living alone in large cities incurs what can be termed a significant “singles tax,” as individuals face elevated costs for necessities like food, shelter, and transportation.

Tax Season Alert: IRS Audit Risks and Red Flags for American Filers

As Americans submit their tax returns this season, there’s a growing concern about IRS audits amidst the agency’s efforts to enhance service, technology, and enforcement.

Recent IRS actions have targeted affluent individuals, large corporations, and intricate partnerships. However, ordinary taxpayers might still find themselves under audit, with specific issues drawing greater IRS scrutiny, experts note.

Ryan Losi, an executive vice president at CPA firm Piascik, cautioned against the risks of the “audit lottery.” He emphasized the importance of accuracy in tax reporting to avoid potential audit triggers.

Audit rates for individual income tax returns have declined across all income brackets from 2010 to 2019 due to decreased IRS funding, according to a Government Accountability Office report. Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse reported that in fiscal year 2022, the IRS audited 0.38% of returns, down from 0.41% in 2021.

However, Mark Steber, chief tax information officer at Jackson Hewitt, believes that many Americans might feel overly secure about their audit risk.

Here are some key factors that could raise red flags for IRS audits:

1.Unreported Income: The IRS can easily detect unreported income through information returns sent by employers and financial institutions. Income from freelancing or investments, reported via forms like 1099-NEC or 1099-B, can be particularly scrutinized.

  1. Excessive Deductions: Claiming deductions significantly higher than what’s typical for your income level could draw attention. For instance, if your reported deductions are disproportionate to your income, especially in areas like charitable deductions, it might trigger scrutiny.
  2. Rounded Numbers: Filing with rounded figures, especially for significant deductions, may increase the likelihood of an audit. Experts advise against using rounded estimates and emphasize the importance of accurate reporting.
  3. Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC): This credit, designed for low- to moderate-income earners, has historically attracted scrutiny due to improper payments. While higher-income earners are more likely to be audited, EITC claimants face a substantially higher audit rate due to issues with improper payments.

Despite this, the IRS has announced plans to reduce correspondence audits for EITC claimants starting in fiscal year 2024.

While audit rates have decreased overall, taxpayers should remain vigilant about potential audit triggers and ensure accurate reporting to avoid unnecessary scrutiny from the IRS.

US Inflation Slows in January, Easing Pressure on Federal Reserve Amid Economic Growth

Consumer prices experienced a 3.1% increase in January compared to the previous year, a notable deceleration from the prior month but falling short of the anticipated larger cooldown, according to a report released on Tuesday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The slowing inflation trend brought some relief for the Federal Reserve as it evaluates potential interest rate adjustments.

Core inflation, a significant metric that excludes volatile food and energy prices, rose by 3.9% over the year ending in January, matching the slowdown observed in the previous month. This report contrasts with a slight uptick in price hikes seen in December.

The Federal Reserve had been navigating a complex landscape due to the earlier acceleration in inflation, which complicated its strategy to ease its inflation battle through a series of interest rate cuts. Recently, the central bank opted to maintain interest rates at their current levels, choosing to monitor further economic developments before reversing a nearly unprecedented streak of rate hikes initiated last year.

The January slowdown in inflation offers a positive signal for the Fed as it approaches its upcoming rate decision in March. Despite a significant decline from last year’s peak, inflation remains nearly one percentage point above the Fed’s target.

Despite the Federal Reserve’s efforts to temper economic growth by increasing borrowing costs for households and businesses, the U.S. economy has largely resisted these measures. Last month, the economy surpassed expectations by adding 353,000 jobs while maintaining the unemployment rate at a historically low 3.7%, according to data released earlier by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Moreover, recent reports indicate that the gross domestic product (GDP) performed better than anticipated at the end of last year, while consumer sentiment soared in January. However, this remarkable performance may pose challenges for policymakers at the Federal Reserve in their fight against inflation.

The Fed faces the risk of inflation rebounding if it moves too swiftly in cutting interest rates, as heightened consumer demand could fuel a resurgence in price increases. Fed Chair Jerome Powell, speaking in Washington, D.C., last month, acknowledged the consistent decline in inflation over recent months and the robust hiring trends accompanying it. However, he cautioned against an overheated economy.

“We’re not looking for a weaker labor market,” Powell emphasized. “We’re looking for inflation to continue to come down, as it has been coming down for the last six months.”

He further noted, “We’re not declaring victory at this point. We think we have a ways to go.”

Millennials Navigate Economic Challenges: Reevaluating the American Dream Amidst Soaring Prices, Housing Dilemmas, and Shifting Priorities

Rachael Gambino and Garrett Mazzeo meticulously followed the financial playbook: education, debt reduction, aggressive savings, marriage, homeownership, and starting a family—a quintessential American dream. However, seated at the kitchen table of their suburban Pennsylvania home, a property they both appreciate and feel somewhat ensnared by, they reflect on their journey, expressing reservations about doing it all over again the same way.

The couple, parents to nine-month-old Miles, has a different perspective for their son. Rachael, 33, observes, “I think a lot of Millennials were forced into saying, ‘you need a four-year degree in order to be successful,’” emphasizing the burden of significant student loan debt taken on at a young age. Concerned about this narrative, she adds, “At 18, you’re signing up to be $100,000 in debt before you even really know how to make the best decisions for yourself. I think we need to change that narrative.”

Rachael and Garrett acknowledge their fortune, both maintaining steady employment and temporarily residing with Rachael’s sister, Kristen Gambino, who helps with the mortgage. Despite these advantages, the couple feels precarious, managing their daily lives meticulously through a budget where Garrett, 35, monitors every dollar flowing in and out. Rachael questions, “This is the American Dream. But at what cost? What are we paying for the American Dream now?”

The Vibecession

In post-Covid America, an odd paradox exists: the economy appears robust, yet a pervasive sense of discontent prevails. A recent CNN poll revealed that a staggering 71% of Americans deemed economic conditions “poor,” with 38% describing them as “very poor.” This sentiment has improved marginally since the summer of 2022 when 82% perceived the economy as poor.

Various factors contribute to this economic dissatisfaction, including soaring prices, a challenging housing market, persistent inequality, and escalating debt. While inflation, reaching decades-high levels, is gradually receding, the aftermath is a landscape of elevated prices for essentials and indulgences deferred during the pandemic, such as concert tickets and vacations.

Despite Millennials making significant strides in wealth accumulation over the past four years, they endured over a decade of stagnant wages and relatively flat wealth growth. Brendan Duke, senior director for economic policy at the Center for American Progress, highlights that Millennials are the most educated generation in U.S. history, but this education came at a substantial cost. Between 1987 and 2017, the cost of attending a public four-year college surged by over 200%, leaving the average student debt for those aged 25 to 34 at $32,000.

Generational Wealth Gap

Millennials, now aged 27 to 42, have struggled to match the wealth accumulation of their Baby Boomer parents and Gen X counterparts. Raised during the economic boom of the 1990s, they entered adulthood during the Great Recession, a period that scarred their early professional lives. The recession not only made entry-level jobs scarce but also delayed the retirement plans of older workers, hindering career progression for the younger generation.

By 2016, families led by Millennials born in the 1980s were approximately 34% below their “wealth expectations.” While this gap has diminished, with Millennials now only 11% below these expectations, they face the highest debt burden across demographics, making them particularly susceptible to economic shocks, such as a pandemic.

The Myth of the Nest Egg

The quintessential American Dream often centers around homeownership as the key to wealth building. However, in the Covid-era economy, this dream has transformed into more of a fantasy. Low housing inventory, a lingering effect of the 2007 housing bubble collapse, combined with remote work trends, led to a surge in home prices between 2021 and 2022.

For Rachael and Garrett, who aimed for a 20% down payment to secure a home in 2022, the rapidly rising home prices and interest rates dealt a painful blow. Missing the low-rate window, they find themselves with a monthly mortgage payment consuming 40% of their take-home income. While interest rates are anticipated to decrease, offering a chance to refinance, the couple currently navigates a challenging financial landscape.

Renting, once seen as less favorable than buying, is now a more financially viable option. A report from Attom, a real estate data company, indicates that renting a three-bedroom home is more affordable than owning a similarly sized unit in nearly 90% of local markets in the U.S. Despite this, homeownership remains a priority for many Millennials, ingrained in them as a fundamental part of the American Dream.

Rachael and Garrett, though acknowledging their relative fortune, harbor concerns about potential financial instability. The fear of job loss or unexpected medical bills looms large, and the eventual departure of Rachael’s sister, currently a tenant, adds another layer of uncertainty to their financial planning.

Silver Linings

The economic challenges faced by consumers in the previous year, marked by rapidly rising prices and interest rates, have been taxing. However, some relief is on the horizon. Wages have outpaced prices since 2019, with Millennials experiencing an average wage increase of 14%, adjusted for inflation, between ages 29 and 38.

While this wage growth is a positive development, Brendan Duke notes that it may not fully alleviate the financial strain on workers who have become parents during the same period. The high cost of childcare often offsets wage increases, emphasizing the need for societal investments in areas like parental leave and affordable housing.

For Rachael and Garrett, the reality of childcare costs prompted a reassessment of their family planning timeline. Rachael expresses the desire to have children close in age, but financial constraints dictate a delay of at least four years before expanding their family.

Rachael and Garrett’s story reflects the broader struggles of Millennials as they navigate the complex economic landscape. The American Dream, once a straightforward path to prosperity, now demands a nuanced approach and a critical examination of the traditional narratives surrounding education, homeownership, and financial stability.

Google Pay and NPCI Collaborate to Propel India’s UPI onto the Global Stage, Streamlining International Payments and Redefining Digital Payment Infrastructures Worldwide

Alphabet Inc.’s Google Pay is teaming up with the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) to propel India’s innovative mobile payment system, the Unified Payments Interface (UPI), onto the global stage.

The collaboration between Google India Digital Services and NPCI aims to streamline international payments for Indian travelers and contribute to the establishment of UPI-like digital payment infrastructures in other countries. This aligns with NPCI’s goal to elevate India’s standing in the global digital payment arena and simplify remittances by reducing reliance on traditional money transfer systems.

Ritesh Shukla, CEO of NIPL, expressed excitement about the potential of this partnership, stating, “UPI has demonstrated to the world the change that happens in economies with the introduction of interoperable, population-scale digital infrastructure, and each economy that joins such networks will create an impact beyond the sum of parts.”

Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Indian government has actively promoted the international expansion of UPI. In a significant move last year, India and Singapore merged their systems, enabling real-time monetary transfers. Ongoing explorations for collaborations with countries like Sri Lanka and the United Arab Emirates are indicative of India’s commitment to expanding UPI’s global reach.

According to recent statistics from India’s central bank, in November alone, UPI processed transactions worth approximately $209 billion. The new partnership with Google Pay is expected to further amplify UPI’s reach and influence in the international digital payments sphere.

Google Pay’s alliance with NPCI marks a strategic move to propel UPI onto the global stage, benefiting Indian travelers with simplified international payments and aiding the development of similar digital payment infrastructures worldwide. The enthusiasm expressed by NIPL’s CEO underscores the transformative potential of interoperable digital infrastructure, while the Indian government’s initiatives, under Prime Minister Modi’s leadership, continue to drive UPI’s international expansion. The impressive transaction volumes in November highlight UPI’s current significance, with the collaboration set to enhance its impact in the global digital payments landscape.

Blooming BRICS: Former White House Economist Warns of Dollar’s Growing Challenge

The US dollar could encounter a formidable challenge from BRICS countries due to their expanding size and influence in global trade, warns former White House economist Joe Sullivan.

Sullivan, in a recent op-ed for Foreign Policy, highlighted the rising concerns that BRICS nations might introduce a currency to rival the US dollar in international trade. This potential currency could potentially displace the dollar from its current dominant position in global trade markets and as the primary reserve currency.

Although BRICS officials have denied the existence of such a rival currency, Sullivan cautioned that the bloc of emerging market countries, which has recently welcomed Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, poses a threat to the greenback based on its growing influence.

Sullivan also pointed out the substantial influence of the BRICS bloc in commodities markets. Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates are among the world’s leading exporters of fossil fuels, while Brazil, China, and Russia are significant exporters of precious metals.

The inclusion of Saudi Arabia, in particular, could provide BRICS+ with a significant advantage, as the Middle Eastern nation holds over $100 billion in US Treasury bonds, contributing to the total holdings of US Treasurys by BRICS countries surpassing $1 trillion, according to Sullivan.

Sullivan argued, “The BRICS+ nations do not need to wait until a shared trade currency meets the technical conditions typical of a global reserve currency before they swing their newly enlarged economic wrecking ball at the dollar.”

He also highlighted the growing prominence of China’s yuan in global trade, as Beijing’s trading partners increasingly use the renminbi.

Sullivan further warned that these trends could eventually place the US dollar in a position similar to that of the British pound in the 1800s when it lost its international dominance.

He explained, “The BRICS+ states do not even necessarily need to have a shared trade currency to chip away at King Dollar’s domain. If BRICS+ demanded that you pay each member in its own national currency to trade with any of them, the dollar’s role in the world economy would diminish. There would not be a clear replacement for the dollar as a global reserve. A variety of currencies would gain in importance.”

However, some economists hold a different view, suggesting that the US dollar’s role as the world’s primary trading and reserve currency will likely persist for an extended period. The data from the Bank of International Settlements and the International Monetary Fund show that the greenback continues to outperform rival currencies in international trade and central bank reserves by a significant margin. The yuan has only recently made modest gains in central banks’ holdings.

The Top Economies in the World(1980-2075)

As per a new report from Goldman Sachs, the equilibrium of worldwide financial power is projected to move decisively in the next few decades.

In the realistic above, we’ve made a knock diagram that gives a verifiable and prescient outline of the world’s best 15 economies at a few achievements: 1980, 2000, 2022, and Goldman Sachs projections for 2050 and 2075.

Projections and Features for 2050

Rank Country Real GDP in 2050 (USD trillions)
1  China $41.9
2  US $37.2
3  India $22.2
4  Indonesia $6.3
5  Germany $6.2
6  Japan $6.0
7  UK $5.2
8  Brazil $4.9
9  France $4.6
10  Russia $4.5
11  Mexico $4.2
12  Egypt $3.5
13  Saudi Arabia $3.5
14  Canada $3.4
15  Nigeria $3.4

The accompanying table shows the extended top economies on the planet for 2050. All figures address genuine Gross domestic product projections, in light of 2021 USD.

A significant subject of the beyond a very long while has been China and India’s inconceivable development. For example, somewhere in the range of 2000 and 2022, India bounced eight spots to turn into the fifth biggest economy, outperforming the UK and France.

By 2050, Goldman Sachs accepts that the heaviness of worldwide Gross domestic product will move significantly more towards Asia. While this is somewhat because of Asia beating past figures, it is additionally because of BRICS countries failing to meet expectations.

Prominently, Indonesia will turn into the fourth greatest economy by 2050, outperforming Brazil and Russia as the biggest developing business sector. Indonesia is the world’s biggest archipelagic state, and right now has the fourth biggest populace at 277 million.

The Top Economies On the planet in 2075

The accompanying table incorporates the fundamental numbers for 2075. Yet again figures address genuine Gross domestic product projections, in light of 2021 USD.

Rank Country Real GDP in 2075 (USD trillions)
1  China $57.0
2  India $52.5
3  US $51.5
4  Indonesia $13.7
5  Nigeria $13.1
6  Pakistan $12.3
7  Egypt $10.4
8  Brazil $8.7
9  Germany $8.1
10  UK $7.6
11  Mexico $7.6
12  Japan $7.5
13  Russia $6.9
14  Philippines $6.6
15  France $6.5

Projecting further to 2075 uncovers a radically unique world request, with Nigeria, Pakistan, and Egypt breaking into the main 10. A significant thought in these evaluations is quick populace development, which ought to bring about a huge workforce across each of the three countries.

In the mean time, European economies will keep on slipping further down the rankings. Germany, which was once the world’s third biggest economy, will sit at 10th behind Brazil.

It ought to likewise be noticed that China, India, and the U.S. are supposed to have comparative GDPs at this point, recommending fairly equivalent monetary power. Accordingly, how these countries decide to draw in with each other is probably going to shape the worldwide scene in manners that have sweeping ramifications.

Student Loan Repayments Set to Resume with Potential Debt Forgiveness, New Repayment Plan, and Loan Servicer Changes

Following a hiatus of over three years, federal student loan payments are set to resume in the coming months. The recent debt ceiling agreement, signed into law by President Joe Biden, includes a clause that effectively ends the suspension of federal student loan repayments and may make it more difficult for the U.S. Department of Education to prolong the pause. Consequently, around 40 million Americans carrying education debt can expect their next payment due in September.

During the pandemic, the Biden administration has been actively revamping the federal student loan system. As borrowers return to repayment, they may encounter several modifications either already implemented or in the pipeline. Here are three notable changes:

Potential lower payments due to forgiveness

In August, President Biden introduced a groundbreaking proposal to eliminate $10,000 in student debt for tens of millions of Americans, or up to $20,000 for those who received a Pell Grant during their college years. However, legal challenges led to the closure of the application portal within a month.

The Supreme Court is currently reviewing two lawsuits against the plan, with a ruling expected by the end of the month. If approved, around 14 million individuals, or one-third of federal student loan borrowers, would have their entire balances forgiven, according to higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.

These borrowers “likely won’t have to make a student loan payment again,” he said. For those with remaining balances, the Education Department plans to “re-amortize” their debts, recalculating monthly payments based on the reduced amount and remaining repayment timeline.

A new income-driven repayment option

The Biden administration is developing a more affordable repayment plan for student loan borrowers. This new program, called the Revised Pay as You Earn Repayment Plan, would require borrowers to contribute 5% of their discretionary income toward undergraduate loans, instead of the current 10%.

According to Kantrowitz, this revamped plan could significantly reduce monthly payments for many borrowers. The payment plan is expected to become available by July 2024, but it may be implemented earlier if circumstances permit.

A new servicer handling loans

During the pandemic, several prominent federal student loan servicers, including Navient, Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (also known as FedLoan), and Granite State, announced they would no longer manage these loans. Consequently, around 16 million borrowers will likely have a different company handling their loans when payments resume.

Kantrowitz warned that “whenever there is a change of loan servicer, there can be problems transferring borrower data.” Borrowers should be prepared for potential glitches and will receive multiple notices about the change in lender, according to Scott Buchanan, executive director of the Student Loan Servicing Alliance. If a payment is mistakenly sent to the old servicer, it should be forwarded to the new one.

Top Battery Stocks Set to Thrive as Global EV Demand Skyrockets and Lithium Prices Rebound

Leading battery stocks are set to stand out as the demand for electric vehicles surges. The International Energy Agency predicts that one in every five cars globally will be electric this year, significantly impacting EV battery demand.

In fact, Fortune Business Insights estimates that the global EV battery market could expand from $37.9 billion in 2021 to nearly $98.9 billion by 2029, benefiting these three battery stocks.

Albemarle (ALB)

A prime investment opportunity in the electric vehicle battery boom lies in lithium stocks, such as Albemarle (NYSE:ALB). Firstly, the company announced a $1.3 billion investment in a new lithium hydroxide plant in South Carolina to address battery demand. Secondly, the facility is expected to generate around 50,000 metric tons of battery-grade lithium, with the capacity to double production.

Thirdly, this output could facilitate the manufacturing of 2.4 million electric vehicles annually. Adding to the potential growth, lithium prices are recovering. Citigroup analysts even suggest that the downturn in lithium prices may have ended, with an anticipated increase of up to 40% by year-end.

Furthermore, Albemarle has now partnered with Ford, providing battery-grade lithium hydroxide for the automaker’s EVs. Under the agreement, Albemarle will supply over 100,000 metric tons of battery-grade lithium hydroxide to power roughly 3 million future Ford EV batteries. The five-year supply contract commences in 2026 and runs through 2030.

Solid Power

Although the chart might not look promising, Solid Power (NASDAQ:SLDP) should not be dismissed. Needham analysts recently reinstated their buy rating for the stock with a $5 price target, referring to SLDP as a “well-funded call option.” Solid Power is also working to strengthen its partnership with BMW (OTCMKTS:BMWYY) through a joint development agreement, which contributed to the company’s $3.8 million revenue in Q1 2023, an increase of $1.6 million YoY.

Moreover, the company has two significant milestones this year: anticipated improvements in key cell performance metrics and the expected delivery of EV cells to partners by late 2023.

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT)

With a 0.59% expense ratio, the Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (NYSEARCA:BATT) offers investors access to international companies involved in lithium battery technology.

As lithium prices recover, the BATT ETF is also gaining momentum. In fact, with the aggressive increase in lithium prices, the BATT ETF has risen from a recent low of $11.60 to $12.59 per share. Moving forward, it would be ideal for the BATT ETF to retest the $14 per share mark.

Report Reveals Staggering Disparity Among Global Top 1%: Monaco Tops the List, India Ranks 22nd

Many people associate wealth with owning a luxurious home, an extravagant car, and other valuable possessions. However, the top one per cent of the world’s wealthiest individuals possess far more than most can fathom.

Global real estate consulting firm Knight Frank recently published its updated Wealth Report, which discloses the amount of wealth required to become part of the elite one per cent in various countries. Monaco leads the pack, where entering the top tier necessitates a net worth of at least eight figures. According to Knight Frank’s findings, the starting point for Monaco’s wealthiest one per cent is $12.4 million.

Wondering about India? The country ranks 22nd on the list of 25 nations featured in the wealth report, with a minimum requirement of $175,000 (Rs 1.44 crore) to join the top one per cent. India places higher than South Africa, the Philippines, and Kenya.

Knight Frank’s 2022 report highlights that the number of ultra-high-net-worth individuals in India grew by 11 per cent, driven by thriving equity markets and a digital revolution. Among Asian countries, Singapore boasts the highest entry threshold, with $3.5 million needed to join the top one per cent, slightly ahead of Hong Kong’s $3.4 million.

Forbes’ 2023 list of billionaires includes 169 Indians, up from 166 the previous year. Mukesh Ambani retains his title as the richest person in both India and Asia, despite an eight per cent decrease in his wealth over the past year.

Knight Frank’s findings emphasize how the pandemic and rising living expenses have exacerbated the divide between affluent and impoverished nations. The entry-level for Monaco’s wealthiest is over 200 times greater than the $57,000 required to be part of the top one percent in the Philippines, which ranks among the lowest in Knight Frank’s study.

IRS To Launch Free Online Tax-Filing System

The IRS has revealed plans to initiate a trial of a complimentary, direct online tax-filing system for the 2024 tax season. This decision is based on significant taxpayer interest and a relatively low cost associated with the system.

In their eagerly awaited report, the IRS disclosed that they have developed a prototype system which will be introduced through a pilot program. The program will involve a limited number of taxpayers and offer restricted functionality, enabling the Treasury Department to assess how users engage with the system, according to IRS and Treasury officials.

Laurel Blatchford, who leads the Treasury Department’s office responsible for implementing the Inflation Reduction Act, stated, “Dozens of other countries have provided free tax-filing options to their citizens, and American taxpayers who want to file their taxes for free online should have an acceptable option.”

The Inflation Reduction Act increased IRS funding by $80 billion and mandated the agency to evaluate the feasibility of a direct tax-filing system. If implemented, this program could potentially allow taxpayers to prepare and submit their taxes without relying on popular tax preparation companies, which have invested millions to oppose similar proposals in the past.

IRS considers revamping tax filing process

The IRS has identified a strong demand for a complimentary tax-filing service, now referred to as “Direct File.” Laurel Blatchford mentioned, “Seventy percent of the public is interested in a free option deployed by the IRS, so we think there will be excitement there.” The Treasury Department’s decision to proceed with the pilot program was influenced by evident taxpayer interest.

An IRS-conducted survey revealed that 72 percent of taxpayers expressed high or moderate interest in using the direct file service. Additionally, 68 percent of those who prepare their returns stated they would be highly or moderately likely to switch to the IRS’s free online tool.

Significant impact with minimal expected cost

The report estimates the direct file system’s cost to be only a small portion of the $80 billion budget increase the IRS obtained through the Inflation Reduction Act, most of which is designated for enhanced enforcement capabilities. The report found that “Annual costs of Direct File may range from $64 million (assuming 5 million users and a narrow scope of covered tax situations) to $249 million (assuming 25 million users and a broad scope of covered tax situations).”

Funding for this initiative will be sourced from the IRS’s technology and products budget, as well as its customer support budget. IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel also suggested that systems modernization funds allocated in the Inflation Reduction Act could be utilized to strengthen the system.

Understanding Direct File

The report suggests that taxpayers’ confidence in using the IRS system stems from the fact that the IRS already has access to their personal information. However, Danny Werfel, the IRS Commissioner, stated that the direct file prototype would not likely utilize pre-populated forms to further automate interactions with government software, explaining, “Given that it will be limited in scope, we do not expect pre-population or predetermining tax obligations to be part of it.”

This implies that the prototype software will likely adopt a question-and-answer format, similar to many commercial software options, as indicated by the IRS’s recent strategic operating plan for its expanded budget.

Direct File eligibility

Tuesday’s report outlines various scenarios that the Direct File system could accommodate, ranging from basic wage income taxed with the standard deduction to more complex situations involving state returns. Werfel mentioned that the pilot program would further determine the specific taxpayer cases that could utilize the system.

With nearly 90% of all filers using the standard deduction and wages and salaries being taxed at 99% compliance, the Direct File system might handle the majority of common tax situations. This has led to recommendations for a direct file option from the Government Accountability Office, the National Taxpayer Advocate, and numerous tax experts over the years.

Since the early 2000s, the IRS’s Free File program, an agreement between the IRS and a group of private tax preparation companies, has offered free commercial software to lower-income individuals. However, only a small percentage of eligible taxpayers have used it, resulting in accusations of deceit and a $141 million settlement paid by TurboTax maker Intuit to taxpayers across nine states.

Lawmakers’ opinions on IRS e-filing

Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) wrote a letter to Werfel this week, encouraging the adoption of an e-filing program and stating, “The IRS established the free e-filing program in 2003, but it did so in partnership with major tax preparation software companies that frequently mislead taxpayers into paying for their services.”

Werfel recently asserted that his agency has the legal authority to proceed with the report’s conclusions, despite opposition from Senate Finance Committee Republicans. He also mentioned being open to other legal interpretations if questions about authority arise.

Both Republican and Democratic administrations have supported the idea of more direct tax filing methods in the past. Kitty Richards, former director of State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, highlighted proposals from Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush for voluntary return-free systems and an easy, no-cost online filing option, respectively. However, she noted that the tax preparation industry recognized the threat a free government tax preparation and filing process would pose to their profits.

Global Economies Seek to Break Free from US Dollar Dominance

Nations worldwide are embarking on an irreversible course to break away from the US dollar, according to seasoned investment expert Matthew Piepenburg. In a recent interview at the Deutsche Goldmesse conference with the Soar Financially YouTube channel, Piepenburg, partner at emerging markets-focused Matterhorn Asset Management, claims that major economies are now evidently trying to distance themselves from dollar dominance.

He asserts that the US Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes are driving countries like China and Russia to adopt settlement systems that don’t depend on the USD. In addition to China and Russia, both members of the BRICS coalition, Piepenburg reveals that 41 other nations are following suit, possibly concerned about how the US has treated Russia during its conflict with Ukraine.

Piepenburg explains, “So when that dollar gets higher, because Powell is raising the rates, that becomes more onerous and painful for the rest of the world and they begin to break ranks.” He further adds, “Asia in general, China and Russia in particular are very big rank-breaking nations. And, of course, they’re bringing 41 other countries alongside to have trade settlements outside the US dollar.”

The BRICS group, representing the economically-aligned nations of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, is considering launching a global currency that does not rely on the US dollar. Several nations reportedly want to participate, including Saudi Arabia, Iran, Argentina, the United Arab Emirates, Algeria, Egypt, Bahrain, Indonesia, two unnamed East African countries, and one from West Africa.

While Piepenburg doesn’t foresee the yuan or any other currency replacing the dollar as the world reserve currency in the near future, he does identify a “clear trend” of countries worldwide bypassing the dollar as the primary, trusted medium of trade. He concludes, “The clear trend of breaking ranks with the US dollar as a trusted, reliable, dependable trade currency and payment system is now I think irrevocable.”

The World Health Organization (WHO) advises against using sugar substitutes for weight loss, as new guidelines reveal that non-sugar sweeteners (NSS) do not provide long-term benefits in reducing body fat for adults or children. Francesco Branca, director of WHO’s Department of Nutrition and Food Safety, stated, “Replacing free sugars with non-sugar sweeteners does not help people control their weight long-term.” The guidance applies to everyone except those with preexisting diabetes.

While the review identified potential undesirable effects from long-term sugar substitute use, such as a mildly increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, Branca clarified that the recommendation doesn’t comment on the safety of consumption. He added, “What this guideline says is that if we’re looking for reduction of obesity, weight control or risk of noncommunicable diseases, that is unfortunately something science been unable to demonstrate.”

The Deadline Looms For Debt Ceiling

The US federal government is on the brink of being unable to make debt payments, and it’s up to Congress to vote on raising the nation’s borrowing cap, also known as the debt limit. However, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and President Biden are currently at odds over Republican demands to link the debt limit to spending caps and other policy requirements. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has cautioned that the country could exhaust its borrowing authority by June 1, leaving little time for negotiators to reach a consensus.

In a recent meeting with McCarthy, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Biden aimed to find a way forward. Although they didn’t reach an agreement, staff-level discussions continue in an attempt to avert default.

Debt ceiling

You might have some questions about the debt ceiling and the ongoing debate. The debt ceiling, or debt limit, is a restriction on the amount of debt the federal government can accumulate. As Jason Furman, a former economic advisor to President Obama and current economics professor at Harvard, explains, “It used to be that every time you did a Treasury auction where you borrowed, Congress would pass a new law just for that one auction.” However, in 1917, during World War I, Congress opted for a more streamlined approach, allowing the government to borrow up to a specified amount before needing to request an increase. Since 1960, Congress has raised or suspended the debt limit 78 times, according to the Treasury Department.

How do experts know when the government has really run out of funds?

Picture : NBC

Experts determine when the government is nearing its funding limit by examining expected tax revenue, the timing of those payments arriving in Treasury accounts, and scheduled debt payments. This analysis helps establish a timeframe, referred to as an X-Date, when the debt authority might be depleted.

Nonetheless, the Treasury Department has several options, known as extraordinary measures, to prevent default. These measures involve reallocating investments and using accounting techniques to redistribute funds. The federal government technically reached the debt limit in January, but these extraordinary measures have maintained payment flows since then. While experts cannot pinpoint an exact date for when funds will be exhausted, they can estimate a general range, which currently falls between early June and potentially as late as July or August.

Why is there a fight over it?

Debt has generally been viewed unfavorably in American politics, and lawmakers often hesitate to be seen as endorsing more federal borrowing or spending. Additionally, they tend to attach unrelated priorities to must-pass legislation, making the debt limit a prime target for political disputes.

As Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, explains, “Everybody uses [bills to increase] the debt ceiling for their favorite policies.” The real issue arises when discussions about defaulting become more serious. Historically, votes to raise the debt limit were relatively uneventful; however, the situation changed in 2011 when the US came dangerously close to default.

Mark Zandi, an analyst at Moody’s Analytics, notes that while there have been previous political battles over the debt, none were as risky or significant as the 2011 conflict. At that time, Republican House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and President Obama were in a standoff over spending. Republicans demanded deep spending cuts and caps on future spending growth, while Obama insisted on raising the debt limit without any extraneous policies – a clean increase.

Ultimately, Congress reached an agreement to increase the debt limit along with caps on future spending, but not before Standard & Poor’s downgraded the nation’s debt for the first time in history. Today’s situation bears a striking resemblance to the 2011 political struggle, raising serious concerns about the possibility of a default.

What could happen if it’s not raised?

If the debt ceiling is not raised, the Treasury Department would be unable to fulfill its due payments, resulting in a default. This would occur regardless of the type or size of the missed payment.

Some Republicans have proposed a system called payment prioritization, in which certain debts are selected for repayment. However, this would require Congress to pass new legislation, which is politically improbable. Moreover, most experts believe that implementing such a system could be practically unfeasible, and it is not currently being considered as a serious solution.

Has the U.S. ever failed to make these debt payments?

No, the U.S. has never failed to make its debt payments. This reliability is a significant reason why the federal government can easily sell Treasury bonds to investors worldwide and why the U.S. dollar is one of the most trusted currencies.

As MacGuineas points out, “Treasuries are the debt vehicle that are most trusted in the entire world, even if there is an economic crisis that originated in the U.S., people come and buy treasuries because they trust them.” If that trust is jeopardized due to a default or missed interest payment, the U.S. would likely struggle to regain its previous status as the world’s most trusted debtor.

Would capping or cutting spending now resolve the problem?

No, capping or cutting spending now would not resolve the problem, as the debt limit pertains to money already spent due to laws previously passed by Congress. Furman emphasizes that “this borrowing isn’t some unilateral thing that President Biden wants to do… It is in order to accomplish what Congress told him to accomplish.”

Some of the current debt accumulation even results from laws enacted under former presidents, such as Donald Trump. Spending caps and other changes proposed by House Republicans are separate policies designed to address future debt accumulation rather than the immediate need to raise the debt limit.

What else could be affected by a default?

The possibility of a U.S. default may result in a domino effect of negative outcomes across the worldwide financial landscape. The nation’s credit rating could suffer long-term damage, diminishing the value of U.S. treasuries and making it a less attractive investment destination. MacGuineas expressed deep concern, stating, “I am truly concerned there is an actual chance of default and that is so dangerous and such a sign that the U.S. is not able to govern itself in a way that is functioning.”

Zandi cautioned that the fallout might extend beyond merely investment and borrowing rates. He advised, “Don’t worry about your stock portfolio, worry about your job,” emphasizing the potential loss of employment and increased unemployment rates. He added, “This will certainly push us and, you know, it’s going to be about layoffs. Stock portfolios will be the least of people’s worries.”

Furman compared the potential crisis to the 2008 financial meltdown caused by Lehman Brothers Bank’s collapse, suggesting it could be even more severe. “It could be worse than Lehman Brothers, where everyone basically demands their money back because they don’t believe the collateral anymore,” he explained. “And you have the equivalent of a run on the global financial system.”

Is default the same thing as a shutdown?

Default and shutdown are not the same thing. A government shutdown transpires when Congress does not pass annual spending bills before the fiscal year concludes on September 30. Although these two matters may be connected at times, this is because legislators have, on occasion, deliberately synchronized the debt limit extension with the end of the fiscal year to prompt more comprehensive spending debates in conjunction with debt authorization.

Are there other ways this problem could be fixed, aside from just increasing the debt limit?

Apart from merely raising the debt limit, there are alternative solutions to address the issue, as the existing process is widely considered ineffective. MacGuineas from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget believes that while Congress should reassess debt and spending priorities, the current debt limit mechanism fails to compel them to make decisions. She stated, “The debt ceiling is a terrible way to try to impose fiscal responsibility,” describing it as a “dumb approach.”

Instead, MacGuineas proposes a system where the debt limit is increased in line with the passage of legislation by Congress. Some economists have even suggested eliminating the debt limit entirely.

Other less conventional ideas involve minting a $1 trillion platinum coin to cover the debt or elevating the limit to such an extent that subsequent debates would be postponed for years or even decades.

India Phases Out ₹2,000 Notes, Sets September 30 Deadline for Exchange

New Delhi: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has announced its decision to phase out ₹ 2,000 notes and has set a deadline of September 30 for people to exchange or deposit them in their bank accounts. Starting May 23, the RBI’s 19 regional offices and other banks will accept ₹ 2,000 notes in exchange for lower denomination currency. It is important to note that these notes will continue to be considered legal tender, as stated by the RBI.

The RBI has instructed all banks to cease issuing ₹ 2,000 notes with immediate effect.

The introduction of the ₹ 2,000 note took place in November 2016 after Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s sudden demonetization move, which rendered high-value ₹ 1,000 and ₹ 500 notes invalid overnight.

The RBI explained its decision, stating, “The purpose of introducing ₹ 2,000 banknotes was fulfilled once banknotes of other denominations became sufficiently available. Consequently, the printing of ₹ 2,000 banknotes was discontinued in 2018-19.”

To ensure convenience and minimize disruption to regular banking operations, the RBI has allowed the exchange of ₹ 2,000 notes for lower denomination notes, up to a limit of ₹ 20,000 at a time, at any bank beginning May 23, 2023. This facility will be available until September 30, allowing individuals to either exchange or deposit their ₹ 2,000 notes.

Sources informed NDTV that the RBI might extend the deadline beyond September 30 if necessary. However, even after the current deadline, ₹ 2,000 notes will remain valid as legal tender.

The RBI highlighted that approximately 89% of ₹ 2,000 denomination banknotes were issued before March 2017 and are reaching the end of their expected lifespan of four to five years. The total value of these notes in circulation decreased from ₹ 6.73 lakh crore at its peak on March 31, 2018 (comprising 37.3% of the currency in circulation) to ₹ 3.62 lakh crore, representing only 10.8% of the currency in circulation as of March 31, 2023.

The central bank emphasized that the ₹ 2,000 note is not commonly used for transactions. Similar measures were taken by the RBI in 2013-2014 when certain notes were phased out of circulation.

How America Sustains High Deficits Without Economic Collapse

The United States has consistently maintained a high trade deficit for decades, raising questions about how the country manages to avoid economic repercussions that typically accompany such imbalances. This article delves into the factors that enable the US to sustain these high deficits without experiencing financial collapse.

Picture : The Blance

One of the primary reasons the US can maintain high trade deficits is the dominance of the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency. Central banks across the globe hold their foreign exchange reserves in dollars, contributing to the currency’s stability and demand. This status allows the US to run persistent trade deficits without causing a depreciation in its currency value.

Another factor that enables the US to support high trade deficits is the inflow of foreign investments. International investors view the US as a safe haven for their capital due to the country’s strong and stable economy. These investments help finance the trade deficit by providing an influx of foreign funds, which offsets the negative effects of the deficit on the US economy.

The US economy is driven primarily by domestic consumption, which accounts for approximately 70% of its GDP. This strong demand for goods and services helps offset the trade deficit by creating a robust market for imports. As a result, the US can continue importing goods from other countries without significantly harming its own industries.

The US is a global leader in innovation and technological advancements, which contribute to the country’s overall economic strength. These innovations attract foreign investments and facilitate the export of high-value goods and services, such as software, pharmaceutical products, and aerospace technology. This, in turn, helps to mitigate the impact of the trade deficit on the US economy.

The US government’s fiscal policies also play a role in managing the trade deficit. By implementing policies that promote economic growth, the government can stimulate demand for goods and services. Additionally, the US Federal Reserve’s monetary policies influence interest rates and the money supply, which can impact the trade deficit indirectly.

Despite maintaining a high trade deficit, the United States has managed to avoid the economic pitfalls often associated with such imbalances. Factors such as the US dollar’s status as a global reserve currency, foreign investment, strong domestic demand, innovation, and government fiscal policies all contribute to the country’s ability to sustain these deficits. However, it is essential to continue monitoring the trade deficit and its potential long-term impacts on the US economy.

Turbotax Customers Can Claim $141M Settlement Money

(AP) — Millions of Americans who qualified for free tax services — but were instead deceived into paying TurboTax for their returns — will soon get settlement checks in the mail.

In a settlement last year, TurboTax’s owner Intuit Inc. was ordered to pay $141 million to some 4.4 million people across the country. Those impacted were low-income consumers eligible for free, federally-supported tax services — but paid TurboTax to file their federal returns across the 2016, 2017 and 2018 tax years due to “predatory and deceptive marketing,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said.

All 50 states and the District of Columbia signed the May 2022 settlement, which was led by James.

Consumers eligible for restitution payments do not need to file a claim, the New York Attorney’s General Office said Thursday. They will be notified by an email from Rust Consulting, the settlement fund administrator, and receive a check automatically.

Checks will be mailed starting next week, and continue through the month of May. The amount paid to each eligible consumer ranges from $29 to $85 — depending on the number of tax years they qualify for.

“TurboTax’s predatory and deceptive marketing cheated millions of low-income Americans who were trying to fulfill their legal duties to file their taxes,” James said in a Thursday statement. “Today we are righting that wrong and putting money back into the pockets of hardworking taxpayers who should have never paid to file their taxes.”

At the time of the May 2022 settlement, James said her investigation into Intuit was sparked by a 2019 ProPublica report that found the company was using deceptive tactics to steer low-income tax filers away from the free, federal services they qualified for — and toward its own commercial products instead.

Under the terms of last year’s settlement, Intuit Inc. agreed to suspend TurboTax’s “free, free, free” ad campaign. According to documents obtained by ProPublica, Intuit executives were aware of the impact of advertising free services that were actually not free for everyone.

“The website lists Free, Free, Free and the customers are assuming their return will be free,” an internal company PowerPoint presentation said, per ProPublica. “Customers are getting upset.”

When contacted by The Associated Press on Friday, Inuit pointed to the company’s May 2022 statement following the settlement agreement.

“Intuit is pleased to have reached a resolution with the state attorneys general that will ensure the company can return our focus to providing vital services to American taxpayers today and in the future,” Kerry McLean, Intuit’s executive vice president and general counsel, said at the time.

Biden Administration Warns About Growing Risks Of Medical Loans And Medical Credit Cards

The Biden administration has issued a warning to Americans concerning the financial risks associated with medical credit cards and other loans for medical bills. In a recent report, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) estimated that Americans paid $1 billion in deferred interest on medical credit cards and other medical financing between 2018 and 2020. The agency found that interest payments can increase medical bills by almost 25 percent, which can deepen patients’ debts and threaten their financial security.

CFPB’s Director, Rohit Chopra, stated that “lending outfits are designing costly loan products to peddle to patients looking to make ends meet on their medical bills. These new forms of medical debt can create financial ruin for individuals who get sick.” Nationally, KFF Health News found that approximately 100 million people, including 41 percent of adults, have healthcare debt. This large scale problem is feeding a multibillion-dollar patient financing business, with private equity and big banks looking to capitalize on the situation when patients and their families are unable to pay for care. The profit margins in the patient financing industry top 29 percent, according to research firm IBISWorld, which is seven times what is considered a solid hospital profit margin.

One of the most prominent financing options is credit cards like CareCredit offered by Synchrony Bank which is often marketed in physician and dentist waiting rooms to help pay off medical bills. These cards typically offer a promotional period where patients pay no interest, but if the patient missed a payment or could not pay off the loan during the promotional period, they could face interest rates that rise as high as 27 percent, according to the CFPB. Patients are also increasingly drawn into loans administered by financing companies such as AccessOne.

These loans, which often replace no-interest instalment plans that hospitals once commonly offered, can add hundreds or thousands of dollars in interest to the debts patients owe. Hospital and finance industry officials insist that they take care to educate patients about the risks of taking out loans with interest rates. However, federal regulators have found that many patients remain confused about the terms of the loans.

According to the CFPB, the risks are particularly high for lower-income borrowers and those with poor credit. About a quarter of people with a low credit score who signed up for a deferred-interest medical loan were unable to pay it off before interest rates jumped. By contrast, just 10% of borrowers with excellent credit failed to avoid the high interest rates. Regulators found that many patients remained confused about the terms of the loans and that patients often didn’t fully understand the products’ terms and found themselves in crippling financing arrangements.

Despite this, the new CFPB report does not recommend new sanctions against lenders. The study cautioned that the system still traps many patients in damaging financing arrangements. It also stated that “consumers complain that these products offer confusion and hardship rather than benefit, as claimed by the companies offering these products.” The report concluded that “many people would be better off without these products.”

The growth of patient financing products pose risks to low-income patients. Patients should be offered financial assistance to pay large medical bills, but instead, they are funnelled into credit cards, debt consolidations or personal loans that pile interest on top of medical bills they cannot afford.

An investigation conducted by KFF Health News with NPR explored the scale and impact of the nation’s medical debt crisis. They found that 41% of adults have some form of healthcare debt. In the patient financing industry, profit margins are over 29%, which is nearly 7x higher than what is considered to be a solid hospital profit margin. A UNC Health public records analysis found that after AccessOne began administering payment plans for the system’s patients, the percentage of people paying interest on their bills increased from 9% to 46%.

According to the CFPB, “Patients appear not to fully understand the terms of the products and sometimes end up with credit they’re unable to afford.” Federal regulators warned that patient financing products pose another risk to low-income patients. They should be offered financial assistance with large medical bills, but instead, they are being routed into credit cards or loans that pile interest on top of medical bills they cannot afford.

Medical credit cards and other loans for medical bills can deepen patients’ debts and threaten their financial security. The number of people with healthcare debts is increasing, and many patients remain confused about the terms of the loans. Profit margins in the patient financing industry are high, and patients are often funnelled into credit cards rather than offered financial assistance with large medical bills. This can lead to confusion and financial ruin for those who get sick. The report concluded that “many people would be better off without these products.”

Warnings Of Potential Cash Shortage By June 1st, If Debt Ceiling Not Raised

US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has issued a warning that the United States could run out of cash by 1 June if Congress fails to raise or suspend the debt ceiling. The country reaching the debt ceiling means the government would be unable to borrow any further money. On Monday, Yellen urged Congress to act quickly to address the $31.4 trillion debt ceiling. In response, President Joe Biden has called a meeting of congressional leaders to discuss the issue on May 9th.

The debt ceiling has been raised, extended, or revised 78 times since 1960. However, in this instance, House Republicans are demanding drastic spending cuts and a reversal of some aspects of President Biden’s agenda, including his student loan forgiveness program and green energy tax credits, in exchange for votes to raise the debt ceiling. This has resulted in objections from Democrats in the Senate and from President Biden himself, who stated last week that the issue is “not negotiable.”

The president is coming under increasing pressure from business groups, including the US Chamber of Congress, to discuss Republican proposals. A default, which would be the first in US history, could disrupt global financial markets and damage trust in the US as a global business partner. Experts have warned that it could also lead to a recession and rising unemployment. It would also mean that the US would be unable to borrow money to pay the salaries of government employees and military personnel, social security checks, or other obligations such as defense contractor payments.

In addition, even weather forecasts could be impacted, as many rely on data from the federally-funded National Weather Service. In a letter to members of Congress, Yellen stated that “We have learned from past debt limit impasses that waiting until the last minute to suspend or increase the debt limit can cause serious harm to business and consumer confidence, raise short-term borrowing costs for taxpayers, and negatively impact the credit rating of the United States.”

Yellen added that it is impossible to know for sure when exactly the US will run out of cash. Her announcement came on the same day as the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reported that there is a “significantly greater risk that the Treasury will run out of funds in early June.” The CBO report said that “The projected exhaustion date remains uncertain, however, because the timing and amount of revenue collections and outlays over the coming weeks are difficult to predict.”

The Treasury plans to increase borrowing through the end of the quarter ending in June, totalling about $726 billion – about $449 billion more than projected earlier this year. Officials have said that this is partly due to lower-than-expected income tax receipts, higher government spending, and a beginning-of-quarter cash balance that was lower than anticipated.

In a joint statement, Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said that the US “does not have the luxury of waiting until June 1 to come together, pass a clean bill to avoid a default and prevent catastrophic consequences for our economy and millions of American families.” The statement also accused Republicans of attempting to impose their “radical agenda” on America.

On the Republican side, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy accused President Biden of “refusing to do his job” and “threatening to bumble our nation into its first-ever default.” He further stated that “The clock is ticking… The Senate and the President need to get to work — and soon.”

In another letter sent to members of Congress in January, Yellen stated that the Treasury Department had begun “extraordinary measures” to avoid a government default. It is important to resolve this issue as soon as possible to avoid negative consequences for the US economy and its citizens.

GOP-Led Congress Passes “Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023”

The U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday, April 26, 2023 passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 as the debt ceiling debate continues in the nation’s capital. House speaker Kevin McCarthy introduced the legislation on April 19, which would “limit federal spending, save taxpayer dollars,” and “grow the economy.”

The legislation passed 217-215. Four Republicans voted against the bill, which did not get a single vote from a Democrat.

The vote allows the US to raise the nation’s debt limit for one year and limit federal spending growth to 1% annually. The plan, titled the “Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023,” would increase the debt limit by $1.5 trillion, or until March 31, 2024, whichever comes first.

McCarthy also plans to repeal key parts of Democrats’ signature legislative package and President Biden’s college student debt cancellation program. The GOP bill would also remove $80 billion that Democrats approved last year to improve the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). However, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that repealing the measure would increase the deficit.

McCarthy said on the House floor that limiting government spending would reduce inflation and restore fiscal discipline in Washington. He added that if Washington wants to spend more, it will have to find savings elsewhere, as every household in America does. McCarthy noted that Medicare and Social Security would not be impacted by the cuts. The framework also includes work requirements for adults without dependents enrolled in federal assistance programs.

According to a press release, the legislation would specifically:

  • “End the Era of Reckless Washington Spending
  • “Reclaim Unspent COVID Funds
  • “Defund Biden’s IRS Army
  • “Repeal ‘Green New Deal’ Tax Credits
  • “Prohibit [President Joe] Biden’s Student Loan Giveaway to the Wealthy
  • “Strengthen the Workforce and Reduce Childhood Poverty
  • “Prevent Executive Overreach and Restore Article I
  • “Lower Energy Costs and Utilities”

The plan also includes “a responsible debt limit increase.”

However, Democrats remain critical of any efforts to link debt ceiling negotiations to legislation that would require work requirements for those on assistance programs. David Scott, the House Agriculture Committee ranking member, said that holding food assistance hostage for those who depend on it in exchange for increasing the debt limit is a nonstarter.

The US hit its current debt limit of $31 trillion in January. The Treasury Department is employing what it refers to as extraordinary measures to essentially act as a band-aid for several months. Those measures are set to run out in early summer. Should Congress fail to raise the debt limit by then, there would be an unprecedented debt default, something that would throw worldwide financial markets into dire straits and likely lead to a recession.

In a speech, McCarthy blasted the president for not meeting with him to negotiate. The pair last met in February and remain at odds over how to address the debt limit. Biden has repeatedly said he wants to sign a clean debt limit bill. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has also said that efforts to address spending cuts “belong in the discussion about budget, not as a precondition for avoiding default.”

The proposal is likely to face opposition in the Democratic-controlled Senate. Passing the bill would require bipartisan support, which may be difficult given the current political climate. Nonetheless, McCarthy remains optimistic that the proposal will succeed.

“Limited government spending will reduce inflation and restore fiscal discipline in Washington,” McCarthy said. “If Washington wants to spend more, it will have to come together and find savings elsewhere — just like every single household in America.”

“Our plan ensures adults without dependents earn a paycheck and learn new skills,” he said. “By restoring these commonsense measures, we can help more Americans earn a paycheck, learn new skills, reduce childhood poverty and rebuild the workforce.”

“By including these radical proposals as a lever in debt limit negotiations, Speaker McCarthy and his extreme Republican colleagues are ensuring their failure,” David Scott, D-Ga., House Agriculture Committee ranking member, said of McCarthy’s proposal for work requirements.

“President Biden has a choice: Come to the table and stop playing partisan political games, or cover his ears, refuse to negotiate and risk bumbling his way into the first default in our nation’s history,” McCarthy said.

Warren Buffett Worried About Nuclear Threats And Pandemics

Warren Buffett, the billionaire investor, expressed that he is not worried about the success of his company, Berkshire Hathaway, despite current economic headwinds such as banking failures and rising interest rates. Speaking on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” the 92-year-old said, “I never go to bed worried about Berkshire and how we’ll handle a thing.” He added that, at his age, he has other things to worry about, such as “the nuclear threat” and “a pandemic in the future.”

Berkshire Hathaway, under Buffett’s leadership since 1965, has become one of the world’s largest companies with a market capitalization above $707 billion. Its portfolio of investments includes Geico, Dairy Queen, Duracell, and Fruit of the Loom. Buffett’s history of optimism is well-documented, with data scientists identifying a surplus of positivity in his annual letters to shareholders.

Buffett’s investment strategy is to choose investments he believes in, regardless of their current price, and take advantage of stock drops to buy more of companies he trusts. During a volatile market period in 2016, he advised investors not to watch the market closely when stocks are down. He is known to be supremely self-confident, with “99 and a fraction percent” of his net worth invested in Berkshire, along with several family members.

When confronted with scary issues that are outside of his control, such as nuclear war or future pandemics, Buffett attempts to reduce his stress by focusing on situations and tasks that he can actually solve himself. “I worry about things nobody else worries about, but I can’t solve them all,” he said. “But anything that can be solved, I should be thinking about that.”

Regarding Berkshire’s future, Buffett has already selected the company’s next CEO, Greg Abel, who has stated that he does not plan to diverge from Buffett’s successful formula. Buffett trusts the leaders of Berkshire’s portfolio companies to make the right business decisions and expects Abel to do the same. “I am not giving [Abel] some envelope that tells him what to do next,” but Berkshire Hathaway is “so damn lucky” to have Abel taking the reins, Buffett said.

In conclusion, Warren Buffett’s optimism and confidence have helped him build and sustain one of the world’s largest companies. Despite economic headwinds, he remains unworried about the future of Berkshire Hathaway and instead focuses on things he can control. With a trusted successor in place, Buffett is confident that the company’s success will continue long after he steps down.

NITI Aayog Vice Chair Suman Bery Leads Discussion On Indian Economy In New York

The Indian Consulate in New York held a Round Table on India’s economy on April 20, 2023, which was led by India’s Vice Chairman of Niti Aayog Suman Bery, who is on a visit to the United States.

The Round Table was entitled, Indian Growth Story: Speed, Scale, and Opportunities, and it was attended by high-profile guests from the business sector such as Deepak Raj, managing director of private investment firm Raj Associates and Padma Shri recipient Dr. Sudhir Parikh, chairman of Parikh Worldwide Media.

Caption: Vice Chairman of India’s NITI Aayog Suman Bery, speaking at the Round Table on India’s economy held April 20, 2022, at the Indian Consulate in New York. PHOTO: Indian Consulate.

“It was a pleasure participating in the roundtable discussion on the Indian Growth Story: Speed, Scale and Opportunities at the Consulate General of India, New York (@IndiainNewYork) last evening,” Bery, an economist who took over at NITI last year in May, tweeted after the meeting.

The event was attended by approximately 50 corporate leaders from various sectors such as IT, technology, finance, healthcare, high-level executives, and policymakers.

Picture : The Hindu

Dr. Sudhir Parikh, chairman of Parikh Worldwide Media, asking a question at the April 20, 2023, Round Table on India’s economy with Vice Chairman of NITI Aayog Suman Bery, held at the Indian Consulate in New York. Also seen are other high profile participants, as well as India’s Deputy Consul General Dr. Varun Jeph, right. PHOTO: Indian Consulate

Among the subjects discussed were the markers of India’s economic growth making it one of the world’s fastest-growing economies; elements of India’s energy transition, New Delhi’s Free Trade Agreements which give a strong push to Indian trade, India’s G20 leadership, women’s empowerment, etc.

Businessman from New Jersey Deepak Raj, addressing India’s NITI Aayog Vice Chairman Suman Bery (not in picture) at the April 20, 2023, Round Table on India’s economy, held at the Indian Consulate in New York. PHOTO: Indian Consulat

The International Monetary Fund estimates India’s growth projections at 5.9 percent in 2023, and 6.3 percent in 2024, compared to the much lower World Output at 2.8 percent in and 3.0 percent, Bery noted accompanied by a visual table.

India has signed 13 Free Trade Agreements and 6 preferential pants so far with its trading partners for ensuring greater market access for domestic goods and promoting exports, Bery pointed out, with appropriated visual representations. The most recent FTAs signed are with Mauritius, UAE, and Australia.

More than 50 high- profile attendees were present at the April 20, 2023, Round Table on the Indian economy, held at the Indian Consulate in New York, with Vice Chair of India’s NITI Aayog Suman Bery. PHOTO: Indian Consulate

India is also actively engaged in FTA negotiations with countries like United Kingdom, European Union, and Canada.

India’s energy transition includes elements of – increasing electrification; higher penetration of cleaner fuels in energy mix; accelerated adoption of energy-efficient technologies; rising digitalization, among other efficiencies, Bery noted.

On the same day, April 20, Bery was the chief guest at a Student Roundtable and Lunch in Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy at the School of International and Public Affairs.

Before being appointed Vice Chair at NITI Aayog, Bery served in various capacities – Senior Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi; a Global Fellow in the Asia Program of the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars in Washington D.C.; and a non-resident fellow at Bruegel, an economic policy research institution in Brussels.

In 2012 until mid-2016, Bery was Shell’s Global Chief Economist, where he advised the board and management on global economic and political developments. He was also part of the senior leadership of Shell’s global scenarios group.

Prior to that, Bery served as Director-General of the National Council of Applied Economic Research, one of India’s leading socioeconomic research institutions.

Bery also served at various times as a member of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, of India’s Statistical Commission, and of the Reserve Bank of India’s Technical Advisory Committee on Monetary Policy.

He also worked at the World Bank, engaged in research on financial sector development and country policy and strategy, focusing on Latin America and the Caribbean.

Do The Rich Pay Their ‘Fair Share’?

Tax Day has recently passed and according to a recent Pew Research poll, Americans’ frustration with the tax code has reached its highest point in recent years. The majority of Americans, 56%, say they pay “more than their fair share” of taxes, with the number having increased from 51% from 2019.

It is also no surprise that almost two-thirds of Americans believe that the wealthy do not pay enough taxes, with 61% supporting the idea of raising taxes on households earning over $400,000. However, the definition of what constitutes a “fair share” of taxes is subjective and many Americans may not understand how much of the tax burden the rich bear.

In 2020, the top 1% of taxpayers paid $722 billion in income taxes, which accounted for 42.3% of all income taxes paid – the highest percentage in modern history. In contrast, the bottom 90% of taxpayers paid $450 billion in income taxes, or just 26.3% of the total, representing their lowest percentage of the tax burden in decades. This means that the top 1% of taxpayers pay a far greater share of the nation’s tax burden than 142 million of their neighbors combined.

Picture : Federal Budget

The wealthy do not pay a larger amount solely because they earn the most money. In 2020, the top 1% of taxpayers earned 22% of all adjusted gross income, while their 42.3% share of income taxes is nearly twice their income share. The opposite is true for the bottom 90%, who earned more than half of the nation’s income but paid only 26.3% of the taxes, representing roughly half of their share of the nation’s income. This was not the case in 1980, where the tax burden was more evenly shared. The bottom 90% earned 68% of the nation’s income and paid 52% of the income taxes, while the top 1% earned 9.6% of the nation’s income and paid 17% of the income taxes.

One of the reasons for the progressive tax system in the United States is the massive expansion of social programs delivered through the tax code over the past three decades. Many of the most significant programs aimed at lower-income families and those with children, such as the Child Tax Credit and the Earned Income Tax Credit, are run through the IRS, which deliver roughly $180 billion in benefits each year, much of which is refundable. Since the mid-1990s, tax credits have multiplied, with credits for adoption, child care, senior care, college tuition, buying electric cars or solar panels, and buying health insurance, among other things. However, these responsibilities are beyond the capacity of a tax collection agency, making it difficult for the IRS to function.

Record numbers of taxpayers now pay no income taxes after claiming their credits and deductions, with 34% of tax filers paying no income taxes due to generous credits and deductions in the tax code. In 2019, 54 million tax filers, equal to 34%, paid no income taxes because of the tax code’s generous credits and deductions. In 1980, only 21% of tax filers paid no income taxes due to credits and deductions.

Despite politicians’ rhetoric about ensuring the fair share of taxes, the burden on top earners continues to climb. If the wealthy were indeed able to use loopholes to avoid paying taxes, many of them would need better accountants.

How Ajay Banga Could Reshape World Bank To Tackle Climate Change

World Bank shareholders are gathered in Washington this week for their annual spring meetings, while the global financial institution is poised for new leadership that could change how it approaches climate and other global crises. Business executive Ajay Banga is expected to be confirmed as the bank’s president in the coming weeks.

Richard T. Clark is a political scientist who studies policymaking at the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. Clark says Banga could push the World Bank to tackle climate change more aggressively in three ways, but that each approach carries risk.

Clark says:

“The World Bank is at an inflection point – Ajay Banga is slated to take over for current President David Malpass, who has been labeled a climate-skeptic by some observers. Banga, who was nominated by the United States, faces pressure to reorient the World Bank’s lending portfolio to tackle climate change more aggressively. He could do this in several ways, but each has its pitfalls.

“First, he could ask member states, who fund the organization, for additional resources, but Janet Yellen – the U.S. Treasury Secretary – said the U.S. would not back such a move. Given that the U.S. is the Bank’s largest shareholder, this makes a capital increase unlikely.

“A second option is for Banga to ease capital requirements by expanding the Bank’s lending portfolio without additional funds from member states, but this could put the Bank’s AAA credit rating at risk, especially given that many of the Bank’s debtors are experiencing debt crises of their own, limiting their ability to repay future debt.

“Third, Banga could reallocate funds traditionally offered to developing countries for poverty reduction and physical infrastructure towards climate and clean energy initiatives – for instance, lending to middle-income countries to help them transition away from coal. Unsurprisingly, the world’s poorest nations oppose such a move since it limits their ability to draw on the Fund’s resources to promote growth. More generally, developing nations have long been frustrated with the fact that the World Bank is governed primarily by rich Western countries who may put their own needs ahead of those of the developing world.”

The Rising Cyber Weapons Market Forecast, 2021-2031

Allied Market Research published a report, titled, “Cyber Weapons Market by Type (Defensive, Offensive), by Application (National Defense System, Public Utility, Automated Transportation system, Smart Power Grid, Industrial Control System, Financial System, Communication Network, Others), by End User (Government, BFSI, Corporate, Other): Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2021-2031.” According to the report, the global cyber weapons market was valued at $9.2 billion in 2021 and is estimated to generate $23.7 billion by 2031, witnessing a CAGR of 10.1% from 2022 to 2031.

The use of cyber weapons has grown significantly as the U.S. attempts to develop new tools and capacities for national security and defence. The National Security Agency (NSA) and Cyber Command are at the center of the American government’s significant investments in the creation of cyberweapons. The development of cyber weapons has been fueled by both the rise in reliance on digital infrastructure and the threat of cyberattacks from other countries, criminal groups, and other entities. The U.S. government accessed crucial data from other countries using cyber weapons.

According to Interesting Engineering, in September 2022, the U.S. National Security Agency’s (NSA) cyber-warfare unit used 41 different types of weapons to steal critical technology data from a Chinese space and aviation university. This data included the configuration of critical network equipment, network management information, and critical operational information. Specific information regarding their creation and use is not made available to the general public because the use of cyber weapons by the U.S. is highly classified. Also, it is evident that cyber weapons have grown in importance as a tool in the U.S. national security strategy, which has fueled the growth of the cyber weapons business in the country.

On the basis of application the global cyber weapons market, is segmented into national defense systems, public utility, automated transportation systems, smart power grid, industrial control systems, financial systems, communication networks, and others. The development of international trade and the improvement of living standards have been facilitated by transportation infrastructure. Communities all over the world are connecting more than ever because of huge advancements in the flow of people and things. Yet, the presence of various control systems and auxiliary systems is increasing the interconnection and complexity of transportation networks.

The use of communications and IT has increased the effectiveness and functionality of transportation networks, but it has also raised the possibility of vulnerabilities. Attacks using cyber weapons on transportation networks can take a variety of shapes and have a range of possibilities and outcomes. A popular attack method that overburdens the system and causes a denial-of-service (DoS) for the entire system is traffic redirection to the server. A different type of cyber weapon effect is the theft of personal information, which can result in the displacement of expensive and/or dangerous commodities like explosives, radioactive agents, chemical, and biological chemicals, which is problematic for the transportation industry. Terrorists might utilise these materials, if they were stolen, to make bombs and other deadly weapons. Automated transportation systems that integrate cyber weapons are used to prevent or respond to such incidents, which supports the market’s growth.

Luxury Jewelry Market Size Is Projected To Reach USD 95.8 Billion By 2030

The Global Luxury Jewelry Market is anticipated to grow at a 7.85% CAGR and is estimated to be worth USD 95.78 Billion by the end of 2030.

Luxury Jewelry is well-known for its sophisticated designs and utilization of the most precious and uncommon unrefined substances. The Luxury Jewelry Market is vigorous and quickly developing. It’s also exceptionally divided and determined by buyer conduct and style. In the nearing years, huge market development is normal, from increasing extra cash and amplifying buyer consumption of extravagant merchandise. Assimilating the luxury gems industry with diversion and allure businesses has set new open doors for the market.

One of the main points herding the Luxury Jewelry Market is boosting discretionary cash flow. When the population’s discretionary cash flow develops, so does their purchasing power, bringing about amplified interest and utilization of luxury gems. Also, the traditions embracing extravagant metals are necessary components driving the interest in extravagant adornment pieces.

Amplifying interest in men’s adornments addresses viable freedom for the development of the market over the figure time frame. Generally, ladies are more minded than men toward buying luxury gems. Be that as it may, this pattern is remodelling, inferable from expanding the focal point of men on self-grooming and graceful allure.

The Global Luxury Jewelry Market is segmented into five regions; North America, Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa.

Europe represented the biggest portion of the global industry on the lookout, followed by North America. These areas comprise created nations with high per capita pay, just as significant luxury brands, filling the market development. Also, the high female workforce interest rate in these countries is a significant factor that adds to the development of the market. Besides, the Asia- Pacific area is expected to have a high CAGR during the estimated time frame.

Asia Pacific dominated the market for luxury jewelry and was considered for the largest revenue share of 65.4% in 2021. China and India are the two largest markets for luxury jewelry in the region. The latest styles and the requirement for high-quality jewelry among top customers are two eloquent drivers driving the market for luxury jewelry in this region.

The region is anticipated to see an increase in the popularity of online distribution. The majority of luxury jewelry is bought for special occasions or events like marriages and engagements. Further, due to continuous restrictions on international travel and the augmentation of domestic duty-free zones in China, demand from younger customers as well as those who shop domestically is anticipated to climb.

The global Luxury Jewelry Market’s prominent key players are Buccellati Holding, Italia SPA, Chopard International SA, Mikimoto & Co. Ltd., Bulgari S.P.A., Graff Diamond Corporation, Companies Financiere Richmond S.A., Tiffany & Co., Societe Cartier, Harry Winston Inc., Guccio Gucci S.P.A., Chanel, LVMH Moet Hennessy, Signet Jewellers, Cartier International SNC, Rajesh Exports Ltd.

New Leaders At World Bank And BRICS Bank Have Different Outlooks

US President Joe Biden announced that the United States had placed the nomination of Ajay Banga to be the next head of the World Bank, established in 1944. There will be no other official candidates for this job since—by convention—the US nominee is automatically selected for the post. This has been the case for the 13 previous presidents of the World Bank—the one exception was the acting president Kristalina Georgieva of Bulgaria, who held the post for two months in 2019. Georgieva is currently the managing director of the IMF.

In the official history of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), J. Keith Horsefield wrote that US authorities “considered that the Bank would have to be headed by a US citizen in order to win the confidence of the banking community, and that it would be impracticable to appoint US citizens to head both the Bank and the Fund.” By an undemocratic convention, therefore, the World Bank head was to be a US citizen and the head of the IMF was to be a European national . Therefore, Biden’s nomination of Banga guarantees his ascension to the post.

A month later, the New Development Bank’s Board of Governors—which includes representatives from Brazil, China, India, Russia, and South Africa (the BRICS countries) as well as one person to represent Bangladesh, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates—elected Brazil’s former president Dilma Rousseff to head the NDB, popularly known as the BRICS Bank.

The BRICS Bank, which was first discussed in 2012, began to operate in 2016 when it issued its first green financial bonds. There have only been three managing directors of the BRICS Bank—the first from India (K.V. Kamath) and then the next two from Brazil (Marcos Prado Troyjo and now Rousseff to finish Troyjo’s term). The president of the BRICS Bank will be elected from its members, not from just one country.

Banga comes to the World Bank, whose office is in Washington, D.C., from the world of international corporations. He spent his entire career in these multinational corporations, from his early days in India at Nestlé to his later international career at Citigroup and Mastercard. Most recently, Banga was the head of the International Chamber of Commerce, an “executive” of multinational corporations that was founded in 1919 and is based in Paris, France.

As Banga says, during his time at Citigroup, he ran its microfinance division, and, during his time at Mastercard, he made various pledges regarding the environment. Nonetheless, he has no experience in the world of development finance and investment. He told the Financial Times that he would turn to the private sector for funds and ideas. His resume is not unlike that of most US appointees to head the World Bank.

The first president of the World Bank was Eugene Meyer, who built the chemical multinational Allied Chemical and Dye Corporation (later Honeywell) and who owned the Washington Post. He too had no direct experience working on eradicating poverty or building public infrastructure. It was through the World Bank that the United States pushed an agenda to privatize public institutions. Men such as Banga have been integral to the fulfillment of that agenda.

Dilma Rousseff, meanwhile, comes to the BRICS Bank with a different resume. Her political career began in the democratic fight against the 21-year military dictatorship (1964-1985) that was inflicted on Brazil by the United States and its allies. During Lula da Silva’s two terms as president (2003-2011), Dilma Rousseff was a cabinet minister and his chief of staff.

She took charge of the Programa de Aceleração do Crescimento (Growth Acceleration Program) or PAC, which organized the anti-poverty work of the government. Because of her work in poverty eradication, Dilma became known popularly as the “mãe do PAC” (mother of PAC). A World Bank study from 2015 showed that Brazil had “succeeded in significantly reducing poverty in the last decade”; extreme poverty fell from 10 percent in 2001 to 4 percent in 2013. “[A]pproximately 25 million Brazilians escaped extreme or moderate poverty,” the report said.

This poverty reduction was not a result of privatization, but of two government schemes developed and established by Lula and Dilma: Bolsa Família (the family allowance scheme) and Brasil sem Misería (the Brazil Without Extreme Poverty plan, which helped families with employment and built infrastructure such as schools, running water, and sewer systems in low-income areas). Dilma Rousseff brings her experience in these programs, the benefits of which were reversed under her successors (Michel Temer and Jair Bolsonaro).

Banga, who comes from the international capital markets, will manage the World Bank’s net investment portfolio of $82.1 billion as of June 2022. There will be considerable attention to the work of the World Bank, whose power is leveraged by Washington’s authority and by its work with the International Monetary Fund’s debt-austerity lending practices.

In response to the debt-austerity practices of the IMF and the World Bank, the BRICS Health/Sciencecountries—when Dilma was president of Brazil (2011-2016)—set up institutions such as the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (as an alternative to the IMF with a $100 billion corpus) and the New Development Bank (as an alternative to the World Bank, with another $100 billion as its initial authorized capital).

These new institutions seek to provide development finance through a new development policy that does not enforce austerity on the poorer nations but is driven by the principle of poverty eradication. The BRICS Bank is a young institution compared to the World Bank, but it has considerable financial resources and will need to be innovative in providing assistance that does not lead to endemic debt. Whether the new BRICS Think Tank Network for Finance will be able to break with the IMF’s orthodoxy is yet to be seen.

De-Dollarization Gaining Momentum As Countries Seek Alternatives To Dollar

The U.S. dollar has dominated global trade and capital flows over many decades. However, many nations are looking for alternatives to the greenback to reduce their dependence on the United States.

This graphic catalogs the rise of the U.S. dollar as the dominant international reserve currency, and the recent efforts by various nations to de-dollarize and reduce their dependence on the U.S. financial system.

The global de-dollarization campaign is gaining momentum, as countries around the world seek alternatives to the hegemony of the US dollar.

The global de-dollarization campaign is gaining momentum, as countries around the world seek alternatives to the hegemony of the US dollar. China, Russia, Brazil, India, ASEAN nations, Kenya, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE are now using local currencies in trade.

The Dollar Dominance

The United States became, almost overnight, the leading financial power after World War I. The country entered the war only in 1917 and emerged far stronger than its European counterparts.

As a result, the dollar began to displace the pound sterling as the international reserve currency and the U.S. also became a significant recipient of wartime gold inflows.

The dollar then gained a greater role in 1944, when 44 countries signed the Bretton Woods Agreement, creating a collective international currency exchange regime pegged to the U.S. dollar which was, in turn, pegged to the price of gold.

Picture : Elements of visual capitalist

By the late 1960s, European and Japanese exports became more competitive with U.S. exports. There was a large supply of dollars around the world, making it difficult to back dollars with gold. President Nixon ceased the direct convertibility of U.S. dollars to gold in 1971. This ended both the gold standard and the limit on the amount of currency that could be printed.

Although it has remained the international reserve currency, the U.S. dollar has increasingly lost its purchasing power since then.

Russia and China’s Steps Towards De-Dollarization

Concerned about America’s dominance over the global financial system and the country’s ability to ‘weaponize’ it, other nations have been testing alternatives to reduce the dollar’s hegemony.

As the United States and other Western nations imposed economic sanctions against Russia in response to its invasion of Ukraine, Moscow and the Chinese government have been teaming up to reduce reliance on the dollar and to establish cooperation between their financial systems.

Since the invasion in 2022, the ruble-yuan trade has increased eighty-fold. Russia and Iran are also working together to launch a cryptocurrency backed by gold, according to Russian news agency Vedmosti. In addition, central banks (especially Russia’s and China’s) have bought gold at the fastest pace since 1967 as countries move to diversify their reserves away from the dollar.

How Other Countries are Reducing Dollar Dependence

De-dollarization it’s a theme in other parts of the world as well. In recent months, Brazil and Argentina have discussed the creation of a common currency for the two largest economies in South America.

In a conference in Singapore in January, multiple former Southeast Asian officials spoke about de-dollarization efforts underway. The UAE and India are in talks to use Rupees to trade non-oil commodities in a shift away from the dollar, according to Reuters.

For the first time in 48 years, Saudi Arabia said that the oil-rich nation is open to trading in currencies besides the U.S. dollar. Despite these movements, few expect to see the end of the dollar’s global sovereign status anytime soon. Currently, central banks still hold about 60% of their foreign exchange reserves in dollars.

India Now Has Third Highest Number Of Billionaires In The World

India, which has the third-most billionaires, with 169, had a more mixed year. Indian billionaires as a group – worth $675 billion – are $75 billion poorer than in 2022, as per the Forbes World’s Billionaires List 2023.

As per the list, Mukesh Ambani, Chairman and Managing Director, Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) is the richest India with a net worth of $63.4 billion. Ambani is the 9th richest in the world as per the list.

The Us still boasts the most billionaires, with 735 list members worth a collective $4.5 trillion. China (including Hong Kong and Macau) remains second, with 562 billionaires worth $2 trillion, followed by India, with 169 billionaires worth $675 billion.

Nearly half of all billionaires are poorer than they were a year ago, as per the Forbes World’s Billionaires List 2023.

Falling stocks, wounded unicorns, and rising interest rates translated into a down year for the world’s wealthiest people.

Globally, the list counted 2,640 ten-figure fortunes, down from 2,668 last year. Altogether, the planet’s billionaires are now worth $12.2 trillion, a drop of $500 billion from $12.7 trillion in March 2022.

Nearly half the list is poorer than a year ago, including Elon Musk, who falls from No. 1 to No. 2 after his pricey acquisition of Twitter helped sink Tesla shares.

Bernard Arnault, head of luxury goods giant LVMH, takes his place as the world’s richest person, marking the first time a citizen of France leads the ranking.

Despite a down year in the markets, rising inflation and war in Eastern Europe, more than 1,000 billionaires are actually richer than they were on Forbes’ 2022 list – some by tens of billions of dollars.

Luxury goods tycoon Arnault has had the best run. His net worth surged by $53 billion since last year, a bigger gain than anyone on the planet. Shares of his LVMH, which owns brands like Louis Vuitton, Christian Dior and Tiffany & Co, rose by 18 per cent on the back of strong demand. Now worth $211 billion, Arnault has taken the top spot on the World’s Billionaires ranking. It’s his first time at No 1 – and the first time a citizen of France has led the list.

Michael Bloomberg is ranked 7th on the list with a net worth of $ 84.5 billion. (IANS)

Bernard Arnault Tops Forbes’ Annual Billionaires List

Elon Musk has officially been dethroned from the top of Forbes’ annual “World’s Billionaire’s List.”  The Tesla and Twitter chief is now the second-richest billionaire, worth an estimated $180 billion, which is $39 billion less than the previous year. The top spot has been awarded to Bernard Arnault, the chairman of French luxury goods giant LVMH. His net worth increased more than $50 billion in the past year to $211 billion.

This shouldn’t come as a surprise to Musk, whose position wobbled on the Forbes’ “Real-Time Billionaires” list, which is updated daily, for the past several months. He and Arnault often switch places.

However, Tuesday’s list tracks his wealth annually. Forbes explained that Musk’s wealth had fallen because his $44 billion Twitter purchase, funded by Tesla shares, scared investors and sent Tesla stock sinking sharply last year. Tesla gained much of those losses back this year but is still significantly lower than before Musk bought Twitter.

Picture : Bussiness Insider

Forbes said that “Musk has mostly tweeted himself out of the top spot on the ranks” because Tesla shares are down 50% since his Twitter takeover a year ago. SpaceX is a bright spot for the billionaire, the magazine notes, since its valuation has increased $13 billion to $140 billion over the past year.

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos lost the most amount of money of any billionaire on the list ($57 billion), knocking him down from second position to third. The loss can be attributed to Amazon shares losing nearly 40% of their value last year.

As for Arnault, Forbes said the Frenchman had a “banner year” in 2022 because of record-high profits at the luxury conglomerate, which comprises Louis Vuitton, Christian Dior and Tiffany & Co. Shares of LVMH have climbed 25% over the past year and the patriarch has recently unveiled succession plans to his children.

Forbes said that the total number of billionaires on this year’s list fell to 2,640 (down from 2,668), marking the second-straight year of decline.

“It’s been another rare down year for the planet’s richest people,” said Chase Peterson-Withorn, Forbes senior editor of wealth, in a release. “Nearly half the list is poorer than they were 12 months ago, but a lucky few are billions — or even tens of billions — of dollars richer.”

More than 250 people who were on last year’s list didn’t appear on this year’s, including Kanye West, who lost his Adidas deal, and embattled FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, who lost 94% of his wealth in one day.

Money Can Buy Happiness, Scientists Say

People get happy as they earn more, according to a new study which overturns the dominant thinking that money cannot buy happiness.

The study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences paper, shows that, on average, larger incomes are associated with ever-increasing levels of happiness.

Two prominent researchers, Daniel Kahneman from Princeton University and Matthew Killingsworth from the University of Pennsylvania, surveyed 33,391 adults aged between 18 and 65 who live in the US, are employed and report a household income of at least $10,000 a year.

For the least happy group, happiness rose with income until $100,000, then showed no further increase as income grew. For those in the middle range of emotional well-being, happiness increases linearly with income, and for the happiest group the association actually accelerates above $100,000.

“In the simplest terms, this suggests that for most people larger incomes are associated with greater happiness,” said lead author Killingsworth.

“The exception is people who are financially well-off but unhappy. For instance, if you’re rich and miserable, more money won’t help. For everyone else, more money was associated with higher happiness to somewhat varying degrees,” he added.

The researchers said that the study shows both a happy majority and an unhappy minority exist.

For the former, happiness keeps rising as more money comes in; the latter’s happiness improves as income rises but only up to a certain income threshold, after which it progresses no further.

These findings also have real-world implications, according to Killingsworth.

For one, they could inform thinking about tax rates or how to compensate employees. And, of course, they matter to individuals as they navigate career choices or weigh a larger income against other priorities in life, Killingsworth said.

However, he adds that for emotional well-being money isn’t all. “Money is just one of the many determinants of happiness,” he says. “Money is not the secret to happiness, but it can probably help a bit.”  (IANS)

Biden’s $5 Trillion Tax Gambit Catches Congress By Surprise

President Biden went big in his $6.8 trillion annual budget proposal to Congress by calling for $5 trillion in tax increases over the next decade, more than what lawmakers expected after the president downplayed his tax agenda in earlier meetings.  It’s a risky move for the president as he heads into a tough reelection campaign in 2024.

Senate Democrats will have to defend 23 seats next year, including in Republican-leaning states such as Ohio, Montana and West Virginia, and Americans are concerned about inflation and the direction of the economy.

Republicans say Biden’s budget plan marks the return of tax-and-spend liberal politics; they warn higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy will hurt the economy.  Biden, however, thinks he can win the debate by pledging that he won’t raise taxes on anyone who earns less than $400,000 a year.

Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, called Biden’s ambitious tax plan “jaw-dropping.”

“This is exactly the wrong approach to solving our fiscal problems,” he said of the $5 trillion aggregate total of proposed tax hikes. “I think this sets a new record, by far.”

Grover Norquist, the president of Americans for Tax Reform, a group that advocates for lower taxes, said “in dollar terms, it’s the largest tax increase in American history.”

A surprise and a ‘negotiating position’

Many lawmakers were expecting Biden to propose between $2 trillion and $2.5 trillion in tax increases, based on what he said in his State of the Union address on Feb. 7 and on what media outlets reported in the days before the White House unveiled its budget plan.

The $5 trillion in new tax revenues is more than what the president called for last year, when Democrats controlled the House and Senate.

In October of 2021, when Biden was trying to nail down a deal with Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) on the Build Back Better agenda, he proposed a more modest $2 trillion in tax increases.

The headline number even surprised some Democratic policy experts, though they agree the federal government needs to collect more revenue.

“I didn’t expect to see a number that big, but I’m not alarmed by it. I think it’s a negotiating position,” said Jim Kessler, the executive vice president for policy at Third Way, a centrist Democratic think tank.

Biden told lawmakers at his State of the Union address that his budget plan would lower the deficit by $2 trillion and that he would “pay for the ideas I’ve talked about tonight by making the wealthy and big corporations begin to pay their fair share.”

The president then surprised lawmakers with a budget proposal to cut $3 trillion from deficit over the next decade and to do it almost entirely by raising tax revenues.

Biden has called for a 25 percent tax on the nation’s wealthiest 0.01 percent of families. He has proposed raising the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent and the top marginal income tax rate from 37 percent to 39.6 percent. He wants to quadruple the 1 percent tax on stock buybacks. He has proposed taxing capital gains at 39.6 percent for people with income of more than $1 million.

Kessler noted that Biden’s budget doesn’t include significant spending cuts nor does it reform Social Security, despite Biden’s pledge during the 2020 election to reduce the program’s imbalance.  Kessler defended the president’s strategy of focusing instead on taxing wealthy individuals and corporations.

“The amount of unrealized wealth that people have at the top dwarfs anything that we’ve ever seen in the past,” he said.  “These are opening bids” ahead of the negotiations between Biden and Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) to raise the debt limit.

Senate Republicans are trying to chip away at Biden’s argument that his tax policy will only hit wealthy individuals and companies. “It’s probably not good for the economy. Last time I checked, most tax increases on the business side are passed on to consumers, and I think we need to control spending more than adding $5 trillion in new taxes,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).

Norquist, the conservative anti-tax activist, warned that if enacted, raising the corporate tax rate would reverberate throughout the economy.  “The corporate income tax, 70 percent of that is paid by workers and lower wages,” he said.

He said raising the top marginal tax rate and capital gains tax rate would hit small businesses that file under subchapter S of the tax code. “When you raise the top individual rate, you’re raising taxes on millions of smaller businesses in the United States,” he said. “Their employees end up paying that because that’s money they don’t have in the business anymore.”

How does Biden compare to predecessors?

Norquist noted that Obama and Clinton both cut taxes during their administrations, citing Clinton’s role in cutting the capital gains rate and Obama’s role in making many of the Bush-era tax cuts permanent.  “Both of them ran a more moderate campaign. This guy is going Bernie Sanders,” he said of Biden, comparing him to the liberal independent senator from Vermont.

Biden’s budget is a significant departure from the approach then-President Obama took 12 years ago, when he also faced a standoff with a GOP-controlled House over the debt.

In his first year working with a House GOP majority, Obama in his fiscal 2012 budget proposed cutting the deficit by $1.1 trillion, of which he said two-thirds should come from spending cuts and one-third from tax increases.  Obama later ramped up his proposal in the fall of 2011 by floating a plan to cut the deficit by $3.6 trillion over a decade and raise taxes by $1.6 trillion during that span.

Concerning for some Democrats

Republican strategists say they’ll use Biden’s proposed tax increases as ammunition against Democratic incumbents up for reelection next year.  National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman Steve Daines (Mont.) said Biden’s budget provides “a contrast” ahead of the election.

Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), who faces a tough re-election in a state that former President Trump with 57 percent of the vote, said he’s leery about trillions of dollars in new taxes.

Asked last week if he’s worried about how Montanans might react to Biden’s proposed tax increases, Tester replied: “For sure. I got to make sure that will work. I just got to see what he’s doing.”

McCaul says Jan. 6 tapes not going to show ‘tourism at the Capitol’  Porter on Silicon Valley Bank collapse: ‘You can’t bet on’ interest rates staying low forever

Manchin, who is up for reelection in another red state, has called on his fellow Democrats to focus more on how the federal budget has swelled from $3.8 trillion in 2013 to $6.7 trillion today.

“Can we just see if we can go back to normal? Where were we before COVID? What was our trajectory before that?” he asked in a CNN interview Thursday.   “How did it grow so quickly? How do we have so many things that are so necessary that weren’t before?” he said of the federal budget and debt.

The White House branded the House Freedom Caucus’ deficit plan as “tax breaks for the super wealthy and wasteful spending for special interests,” as the two sides continued to trade jabs amid an escalating debt ceiling battle.

“MAGA House Republicans are proposing, if spread evenly across affected discretionary programs, at least a 20 [percent] across the board cut,” White House Communications Director Ben LaBolt said in an initial analysis of the proposal.

LaBolt pointed to several typically Republican issue areas that would be impacted by such cuts, including law enforcement, border security, education and manufacturing.

“The one thing MAGA Republicans do want to protect are tax cuts for the super-wealthy,” he added. “This means that their plan, with all of the sacrifices they are asking of working-class Americans, will reduce the deficit by…$0.”

The Freedom Caucus on Friday unveiled its initial spending demands for a possible debt ceiling increase, as the potential for default looms this summer. The proposal would cap discretionary spending at fiscal 2022 levels for 10 years, resulting in a $131 billion cut from current levels. Defense spending would be maintained at current levels.

LaBolt claimed that the proposal would also defund police and make the border less secure, turning around two accusations that Republicans have frequently lobbed at the Biden administration.

Such spending cuts would, according to LaBolt’s analysis, eliminate funding for 400 state, local and tribal police officers and several thousand FBI agents and personnel and “deny the men and women of Customs and Border Protection the resources they need to secure our borders.”

He also criticized the Freedom Caucus’s calls to end President Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan and to rescind unspent COVID-19 and Inflation Reduction Act funds, claiming they would increase prescription drug and energy costs and ship manufacturing jobs overseas.

The analysis also accused the group of hard-line conservatives of making plans that would actually increase the federal deficit by $114 billion, and allow “the wealthy and big corporations to continue to cheat on their taxes.” Biden’s $6.8 trillion budget released on Thursday included tax hikes on the wealthy.

LaBolt’s 20 percent number represents a slight adjustment from Biden’s claim on Friday that the plan would require a 25 percent cut in discretionary spending across the board.

“If what they say they mean, they’re going to keep the tax cuts from the last president … no additional taxes on the wealthy — matter of fact reducing taxes — and in addition to that, on top of that, they’re going to say we have to cut 25 percent of every program across the broad,” Biden said during remarks on the economy. “I don’t know what there’s much to negotiate on.”

House Freedom Caucus Chairman Scott Perry (R-Pa.) hit back at the president on Friday, accusing him of misrepresenting their proposal. “For him to mention things like firefighters, police officers and health care — obviously, either he didn’t watch the press conference, he can’t read, or someone is, you know, got their hand up his back and they’re speaking for him, because those are just abject lies,” Perry told The Hill. “It’s the same old, you know, smear-and-fear campaign by the Biden administration.” (Courtesy: CNN)

Indian Startups With Millions Of Dollars Stuck In Silicon Valley Bank Failure

Indian startups that have millions of dollars stuck with the troubled Silicon Valley Bank are waiting for business hours in the US to resume Monday and could withdraw all their money from the bank en masse. The only thing that could stop that is if the US government manages to find a buyer for the beleaguered bank, reports said.

Courtesy a maneuver of the US government on March 12th, businesses with accounts at Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) will have full access to their deposits, unlike a previous measure where only an insured amount of $250,000 would have been immediately accessible. As of December 2022, SVB had $209 billion in total assets and about $175 billion in total deposits.

SVB collapsed Friday morning after a stunning 48 hours in which a bank run and a capital crisis led to the second-largest failure of a financial institution in US history. The chaos instigated by high interest rates led to an old-fashioned bank run on Thursday, in which depositors yanked $42 billion from SVB.

When the FDIC took control of the bank Friday, it said it would pay customers their insured deposits on Monday, which only covers up to $250,000. But there’s a lot of money – and influence – at stake. SVB provided financing for almost half of US venture-backed technology and health care companies. At the end of 2022, the bank said it had $151.5 billion in uninsured deposits, $137.6 billion of which was held by US depositors.

Though a lot of money may have come out during the bank run and customers could receive some uninsured funds as the government liquidates SVB, they are still unsure if they can recover all their cash.

Fearing a larger fall out from the bank collapse, the United States government mobilized immediately in response to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank, working over the weekend to insure depositors who had more than $200 billion of venture capital and high-tech start-up money stored in the two banks.

But unlike the 2008 financial crisis, during which Congress passed new legislation in order to salvage the country’s largest banks, the current rescue plan is smaller in scale, pertains to only two banks, and isn’t additional taxpayer money — for now.

In order to make sure depositors can still withdraw funds from their accounts — the vast majority of which exceeded the $250,000 limit for standard insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) — regulators say they’re pulling from a special fund maintained by the FDIC called the deposit insurance fund (DIF).

“For the two banks that were put into receivership, the FDIC will use funds from the deposit insurance fund to ensure that all of its depositors are made whole,” a Treasury official told reporters on Sunday night. “In that case the deposit insurance funded is bearing the risk. This is not funds from the taxpayer.”

Where the money comes from

The money in the DIF comes from insurance premiums that banks are required to pay into it as well as interest earned on funds invested in U.S. bonds and other securities and obligations.

This is why some observers have been saying that the term “bailout” shouldn’t be used in reference to the current government intervention — because it’s bank money plus interest that’s being used to insure depositors, and it’s only being administered by the federal government.

But standing behind the DIF is the “the full faith and credit of the United States government,” according to the FDIC, meaning that if the DIF runs out of money or encounters a problem, the Treasury could call on taxpayers as a next resort.

This is not an impossibility. The DIF had a $125 billion balance as of the last quarter of 2022 and SVB reported $212 billion in assets in the same quarter. Treasury officials sounded confident on Sunday night the money in the DIF would be more than enough to cover SVB’s deposits.

The Fed steps in for backup

To settle fears of a potential shortfall, the Federal Reserve announced an additional line of credit known as a Bank Term Funding Program, offering loans of up to one year to banks, credit unions, and other types of depository institutions. For collateral, the Fed will take U.S. bonds and mortgage-backed securities, and the line of credit will be backed up by $25 billion from the Treasury’s $38 billion Exchange Stabilization Fund.

“Both of these steps are likely to increase confidence among depositors, though they stop short of an FDIC guarantee of uninsured accounts as was implemented in 2008,” analysts for Goldman Sachs wrote in a Sunday note to investors.

“The Dodd-Frank Act limits the FDIC’s authority to provide guarantees by requiring congressional passage of a joint resolution of approval, which is only marginally easier than passing a new legislation. Given the actions announced today, we do not expect near-term actions in Congress to provide guarantees,” they wrote.

Even as the US government scrambles to find a buyer for the bank, SVB’s UK arm was sold to HSBC for £1, the Bank of England and the British government announced Monday morning. Sheila Bair, former chairperson of the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) – which took over the bank after it was shut down –told the US press that finding a buyer for SVB was “the best outcome.”

India impact

While the British arm of SVB has managed to find a buyer in the UK, that is unlikely to calm Indian startups since they primarily have deposited their money with the US-based SVB, which is headquartered in New York.

The fallout of SVB’s collapse could be far-reaching. Startups may be unable to pay employees in the coming days and venture capital firms may be unable to raise funds. The tech industry is the biggest customer of SVB with a large number of Indian startups, especially in the SaaS (software as a service) sector that services US clients, having accounts at the bank.

Additional loans

Instead of a total government bailout that would have required taxpayer money, the United States’ Federal Reserve announced that it would make available additional loans to eligible depository institutions to help assure that banks have the ability to meet the needs of all their depositors.

A new entity called the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) will be created and it will offer loans of up to one year in length to banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other eligible depository institutions. Those taking advantage of the facility will be asked to pledge high-quality collateral such as Treasuries, agency debt and mortgage-backed securities.

While relatively unknown outside Silicon Valley, SVB was among the top 20 American commercial banks, with $209 billion in total assets at the end of last year, according to the FDIC. It’s the largest lender to fail since Washington Mutual collapsed in 2008.

$8.8 Bn Lost To Scams In 2022

The consumers in the US lost nearly $8.8 billion to scams in 2022, an increase of more than 30 per cent over the previous year, a new report has shown. According to the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), consumers reported losing more money to investment scams — more than $3.8 billion — than any other category in 2022.

That amount more than doubles the amount reported lost in 2021.  Moreover, the report showed that imposter scams caused the second-highest loss amount — $2.6 billion, up from $2.4 billion in 2021.

Prizes, sweepstakes, lotteries, investment-related scams, and business and job opportunities rounded out the top five fraud categories.  Nearly 2.4 million consumers reported fraudulent activity on their accounts last year, most commonly imposter scams, followed by online shopping scams, the report said.

Earlier this month, the FTC released a similar report, saying romance scammers received a hefty payout last year, involving 70,000 victims who lost a combined $1.3 billion.

The report showed that romance scammers often use dating apps to target people looking for love.  Nearly 40 per cent of people who lost money to a romance scam last year, said the contact started on social media, while 19 per cent said it started on a website or app.

Many people mentioned that the scammer then quickly moved the conversation to WhatsApp, Google Chat or Telegram. (IANS)

When Is The US Recession Expected?

(AP) — A majority of the nation’s business economists expect a U.S. recession to begin later this year than they had previously forecast, after a series of reports have pointed to a surprisingly resilient economy despite steadily higher interest rates.

Fifty-eight percent of 48 economists who responded to a survey by the National Association for Business Economics envision a recession sometime this year, the same proportion who said so in the NABE’s survey in December. But only a quarter think a recession will have begun by the end of March, only half the proportion who had thought so in December.

The findings, reflecting a survey of economists from businesses, trade associations and academia, were released Monday.

A third of the economists who responded to the survey now expect a recession to begin in the April-June quarter. One-fifth think it will start in the July-September quarter.

The delay in the economists’ expectations of when a downturn will begin follows a series of government reports that have pointed to a still-robust economy even after the Federal Reserve has raised interest rates eight times in a strenuous effort to slow growth and curb high inflation.

In January, employers added more than a half-million jobs, and the unemployment rate reached 3.4%, the lowest level since 1969.

And sales at retail stores and restaurants jumped 3% in January, the sharpest monthly gain in nearly two years. That suggested that consumers as a whole, who drive most of the economy’s growth, still feel financially healthy and willing to spend.

At the same time, several government releases also showed that inflation shot back up in January after weakening for several months, fanning fears that the Fed will raise its benchmark rate even higher than was previously expected. When the Fed lifts its key rate, it typically leads to more expensive mortgages, auto loans and credit card borrowing. Interest rates on business loans also rise.

Tighter credit can then weaken the economy and even cause a recession. Economic research released Friday found that the Fed has never managed to reduce inflation from the high levels it has recently reached without causing a recession.

₹ 305 Crore Of Jewelry Seized From Joyalukkas

The Enforcement Directorate has seized assets worth ₹ 305.84 crore of the popular jewellery chain Joyalukkas on Friday, days after five of the company’s premises were raided by the probe agency. The ED has accused the jewellery chain of violating provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act.

The case relates to a huge amount of cash transferred to Dubai from India through Hawala channels and subsequently invested in Joyalukkas Jewellery LLC, Dubai which is 100 per cent owned by Joy Alukkas Verghese. On Tuesday, the company had withdrawn its ₹ 2,300 crore initial public offering or IPO saying it needed more time to incorporate substantial changes to its financial results.

The attached assets include 33 immovable properties valued at ₹ 81.54 crore consisting of land and a residential building in Shobha City, Thrissur. Three bank accounts valued at ₹ 91.22 lakh, three fixed deposits amounting to ₹ 5.58 crore and Joyalukkas shares worth 217.81 crores have also been seized by the Enforcement Directorate.

The company had plans to refile its IPO documents “at the earliest, subject to market conditions,” Chief Executive Baby George told Reuters on Tuesday, without elaborating further.

Post a comment The jewellery retailer, which focuses mainly on Southern India, is the latest to delay or pull its IPO plans amid market volatility and stubbornly high inflation. The company operates showrooms across roughly 68 cities.

US Supreme Court Hears Case On Students Loan Forgiveness

(AP) — The United States Supreme Court won’t have far to look if it wants a personal take on the “crushing weight” of student debt that underlies the Biden administration’s college loan forgiveness plan. Justice Clarence Thomas was in his mid-40s and in his third year on the nation’s highest court when he paid off the last of his debt from his time at Yale Law School.

Thomas, the court’s longest-serving justice and staunchest conservative, has been skeptical of other Biden administration initiatives. And when the Supreme Court hears arguments Tuesday involving President Joe Biden’s debt relief plan that would wipe away up to $20,000 in outstanding student loans, Thomas is not likely to be a vote in the administration’s favor.

But the justices’ own experiences can be relevant in how they approach a case, and alone among them, Thomas has written about the role student loans played in his financial struggles.

A fellow law school student even suggested Thomas declare bankruptcy after graduating “to get out from under the crushing weight of all my student loans,” the justice wrote in his best-selling 2007 memoir, “My Grandfather’s Son.” He rejected the idea.

It’s not clear that any of the other justices borrowed money to attend college or law school or have done so for their children’s educations. Some justices grew up in relative wealth. Others reported they had scholarships to pay their way to some of the country’s most expensive private institutions.

Picture : TheUNN

Of the seven justices on the court who are parents, four have signaled through their investments that they don’t want their own children to be saddled with onerous college debt, and have piled money into tax-free college savings accounts that might limit any need for loans.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch have the most on hand, at least $600,000 and at least $300,000, respectively, according to annual disclosure reports the justices filed in 2022. Each has two children.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett, who has seven children, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, who has two, also have invested money in college-savings accounts, in which any earnings or growth is tax free if spent on education. None of the justices would comment for this story, a court spokeswoman said.

Thomas wrote vividly about his past money woes in his up-from-poverty story, recounting how a bank once foreclosed on one of his loans because repayment and delinquency notices were sent to his grandparents’ house in Savannah, Georgia, instead of Thomas’ home at the time in Jefferson City, Missouri.

Thomas was able to take out another loan to repay the bank only because his mentor, John Danforth, then-Missouri attorney general and later a U.S. senator, vouched for him.

Thomas noted that he signed up for a tuition postponement program at Yale in which a group of students jointly paid for their outstanding loans according to their financial ability, with those earning the most paying the most.

At the time, Thomas’ first wife, Kathy, was pregnant. “I didn’t know what else to do, so I signed on the dotted line, and spent the next two decades paying off the money I borrowed during my last two years at Yale,” Thomas wrote.

When he was first nominated to be a federal judge in 1989, Thomas reported $10,000 in outstanding student loans, according to a news report at the time. The Biden administration has picked the same number as the amount of debt relief most borrowers would get under its plan.

Personal experience can shape the justices’ questions in the courtroom and affect their private conversations about a case, even if it doesn’t figure in the outcome.

“It is helpful to have people with life experiences that are varied just because it enriches the conversation,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor has said. Sotomayor, like Thomas, also grew up poor. She got a full scholarship to Princeton as an undergraduate, she has said, and went on to Yale for law school, as Thomas did.

Keeping people from avoiding the kinds of difficult choices Thomas faced is a key part of the administration’s argument for loan forgiveness. The administration says that without additional help, many borrowers will fall behind on their payments once a hold in place since the start of the coronavirus pandemic three years ago is lifted, no later than this summer.

Under a plan announced in August but so far blocked by federal courts, $10,000 in federal loans would be canceled for people making less than $125,000 or for households with less than $250,000 in income. Recipients of Pell Grants, who tend to have fewer financial resources, would get an additional $10,000 in debt forgiven.

The White House says 26 million people already have applied and 16 million have been approved for relief. The program is estimated to cost $400 billion over the next three decades.

The legal fight could turn on any of several elements, including whether the Republican-led states and individuals suing over the plan have legal standing to go to court and whether Biden has the authority under federal law for so extensive a loan forgiveness program.

Nebraska and other states challenging the program argue that far from falling behind, 20 million borrowers would get a “windfall” because their entire student debt would be erased, Nebraska Attorney General Michael Hilgers wrote in the states’ main Supreme Court brief.

Which of those arguments resonate with the court may become clear on Tuesday.

When she was dean of Harvard Law School, Justice Elena Kagan showed her own concern about the high cost of law school, especially for students who were considering lower-paying jobs.

Kagan established a program that would allow students to attend their final year tuition-free if they agreed to a five-year commitment to work in the public sector. While that program no longer exists, Harvard offers grants to students for public service work.

At the time the program was created, Kagan said she wanted students to be able to go to work where they “can make the biggest difference, but that isn’t the case now.” Instead, she said: “They often go to work where they don’t want to work because of the debt burden.”

Ajay Banga Nominated By Biden To Lead World Bank

President Joe Biden has nominated a former boss of Mastercard with decades of experience on Wall Street to lead the World Bank and oversee a shake-up at the development organization to shift its focus to the climate crisis.

Ajay Banga, an American citizen born in India, comes a week after David Malpass, a Donald Trump appointee, quit the role. The World Bank’s governing body is expected to make a decision in May, but the US is the Washington-based organisation’s largest shareholder and has traditionally been allowed to nominate without challenge its preferred candidate for the post.

Malpass, who is due to step down on 30 June, was nominated by Trump in February 2019 and took up the post officially that April. He is known to have lost the confidence of Biden’s head of the US Treasury, Janet Yellen, who with other shareholders wanted to expand the bank’s development remit to include the climate crisis and other global challenges.

Ajay Banga, former president and CEO of Mastercard and current vice chairman of the private equity firm General Atlantic, is Biden’s nomination as the next president of the World Bank.

Biden, in a statement Thursday, called Banga – a native of India and former chairman of the International Chamber of commerce – “uniquely equipped” to lead the World Bank, a global development institution that provides grants and loans to low-income countries to reduce poverty and spur development.

Biden touted Banga’s work leading global companies that brought investment to developing economies and his record of enlisting the public and private sectors to “tackle the most urgent challenges of our time, including climate change.”

The Biden administration is looking to recalibrate the focus of the World Bank to align with global efforts to reduce climate change.

Malpass, nominated by former President Donald Trump, still had a year remaining on his five-year term as president. Malpass came under fire when he said, “I’m not a scientist,” when asked at a New York Times event in September whether he accepts the overwhelming scientific evidence that the burning of fossil fuels has caused global temperatures to rise. Former Vice President Al Gore, who called Malpass a “climate denier,” was among several well-known climate activists to call for his resignation.

Banga was the top executive at Mastercard from 2010 to 2020. He has served as a co-chair of Vice President Kamala Harris’ Partnership for Central America, which has sought to bring private investment to the region.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen applauded Biden’s pick. She said Banga understands the World Bank’s goals to eliminate poverty and expand prosperity are “deeply intertwined with challenges like meeting ambitious goals for climate adaptation and emissions reduction, preparing for and preventing future pandemics, and mitigating the root causes and consequences of conflict and fragility.”

Banga still needs confirmation by the bank’s board to become president. It’s unclear whether there will be additional nominees from other nations.

Stocks Tumbles 20% After US Research Group Accuses Adani Group Of Stock Manipulation

Shares of Adani Enterprises plunged on Friday as a scathing report by a US-based short seller triggered a massive selloff in the conglomerate’s listed firms, casting doubts on the company’s record $2.45 billion secondary offering, reported news agency Reuters.

The selloff in Adani’s corporate empire accelerated on Friday, erasing more than $50 billion of market value in less than two sessions as Asia’s richest man struggles to contain the fallout, reported news agency Bloomberg.

Adani Group’s share prices of its seven listed companies nosedived last week, after Hindenburg Research stated that it assumed a short position, in particular securities of the conglomerate. In response, Adani Group dismissed the allegations as ‘baseless’, termed the report as ‘malicious combination of selective misinformation and stale,’ and is contemplating legal action against the American investor.

“If Adani is serious, it should also file suit in the U.S. where we operate. We have a long list of documents we would demand in a legal discovery process,” Hindenburg said while also asserting that it fully stands by its findings.

As per reports, Hindenburg Research said that the company hasn’t addressed a single substantive issue raised in the 32,000-word report. “At the conclusion of our report, we asked 88 straightforward questions that we believe give the company a chance to be transparent. Thus far, Adani has answered none of these questions,” the short seller has reportedly said.

The report alleges that the Indian group, headed by Asia’s richest man, Gautam Adani, had engaged in brazen stock manipulation and accounting fraud. It contains details of the Adani family’s alleged shell companies in tax havens across Mauritius, the United Arab Emirates, and the Caribbean, established for facilitating money laundering and tax evasion through siphoning money from the group’s listed entities.

Following the accusations, Adani Transmission shares crashed above 19 percent and Adani Gas tumbled 19.1 percent in their biggest downward trajectory since March 2020, while Adani Green Energy depreciated around 16 percent on the BSE during today’s early trading session. The share prices of Ambuja Cements, NDTV, and ACC, the Indian conglomerate’s recent acquisitions, also declined 7.71 percent, 4.98 percent, and 7.26 percent respectively, on Wednesday, according to reports.

The Adani Group announced on Jan 26, 2023, that it is considering taking legal action against Hindenburg Research for a report from January 23, 2023, that accused the Indian conglomerate of “brazen stock manipulation and accounting fraud scheme.”

Jatin Jalundhwala, legal head for Adani Group, said, “The maliciously mischievous, unresearched report published by Hindenburg Research on 24 Jan 2023 has adversely affected the Adani Group, our shareholders and investors.”

The report was released ahead of the Rs 20,000 crore follow-on public offer (FPO) by Adani Enterprises, the flagship company of the Adani Group. The FPO had raised Rs 5,984.9 crore from 33 anchor investors on Wednesday.

A foreign brokerage house has said that Indian banks have an exposure of Rs 81,200 crore to Adani Group, whose group debt is Rs 2 lakh crore (about $24 billion), according to media reports.

Analysts said the listed Adani firms lost more than Rs 3 lakh crore in market capitalisation on Friday and more than Rs 4.10 lakh crore since Wednesday.

The three companies recently acquired by the Adani group — Ambuja Cement, ACC and NDTV — also wilted. The tycoon has seen over $7 billion of his personal wealth wiped out since the start of the year, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires’ Index which has yet to factor in last week’s meltdown.

India Continues As World’s Fastest-Growing Economy With 5.8% Growth Rate

United Nations– India will remain the fastest-growing major economy recording a growth of 5.8 per cent this year, while the rest of the world will grow by a paltry 1.9 per cent, the UN said on Thursday.

The UN’s World Economic Situation and Prospects (WESP) report sliced off 0.2 per cent from the 6 per cent gross domestic product growth projection made last May without affecting India’s rank as the country faces headwinds from the global economy.

Overall, the report said: “Growth in India is expected to remain strong at 5.8 per cent, albeit slightly lower than the estimated 6.4 per cent in 2022, as higher interest rates and a global slowdown weigh on investment and exports.” Next year, the UN expects India’s economy to grow by 6.7 per cent.

Picture : Rediff.com

The WESP gave a positive picture of India’s jobs scene, noting that its “unemployment rate dropped to a four-year low of 6.4 per cent in India, as the economy added jobs both in urban and rural areas in 2022”. For the world, the WESP forecast is 1.9 per cent this year and rising to 2.7 per cent next year.

In New Delhi, India’s President Droupadi Murmu credited India’s economic performance to “its leadership. India has been among the fastest-growing major economies because of the timely and proactive interventions of the government. The ‘Aatmanirbhar Bharat’ initiative, in particular, has evoked great response among the people at large,” Murmu said in her Republic Day speech.

China, which came in second, is projected to grow by 4.8 per cent this year and 4.5 next year, after a 3% growth in 2022. The US economy, which grew by 2.9% this year is projected to grow by 0.4% this year and 1.7 per cent the next.

For South Asia as a whole, the report said the region’s “economic outlook has significantly deteriorated due to high food and energy prices, monetary tightening and fiscal vulnerabilities” and it forecast a 4.8 percent growth year and 5.9 percent next year.

This was buoyed by India as the report said: “The prospects are more challenging for other economies in the region. Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka sought financial assistance from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 2022.”

Rashid attributed the Indian economy’s growth to three factors: falling unemployment that signals strong domestic demand; easing of inflation, and lower import bills.

He said that the “unemployment rate has come down significantly in the last four years” to 6.4 per cent and “that means the domestic demand has been pretty strong”.

The WESP said that this occurred because “the economy added jobs both in urban and rural areas in 2022”.

“The inflation pressure also has eased quite significantly,” Rashid said with the year-on-year inflation rate to be 5.5 per cent this year and 5 per cent next year.

“That means that the central bank would not have to be aggressive over monetary tightening,” he said.

India has also benefitted to from lower imports, especially energy import cost that has been lower than in previous years, he added.

“I think this is a sustainable growth rate for India, given India also has a significant number of people living in poverty. So this would be a great boost if India can sustain this growth rate in the near term,” Rashid said.

He also pointed to two risk factors for India’s economy mainly emanating from the global situation.

One is from higher interest rates that would raise the debt servicing cost which has exceeded 20 per cent of the budget, he said.

“That is a significantly high debt servicing cost and that would probably have some drag on the growth prospect,” he said.

The second risk is from global external demands falling.

If Europe and the US go into a very slow growth mode resulting in lower global exports, the world economy may suffer, Rashid said.

“But on the balance, we believe that Indian economy is on a strong footing given the strong domestic demand in the near term,” he said.

For South Asia as a whole, the report said the region’s “economic outlook has significantly deteriorated due to high food and energy prices, monetary tightening and fiscal vulnerabilities” and it forecast a 4.8 per cent growth year and 5.9 per cent next year.

This was buoyed by India as the report said, “The prospects are more challenging for other economies in the region. Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka sought financial assistance from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 2022.”

Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka have gone to the International Monetary Fund for help. Rashid said, “We call for greater international support in this difficult time for countries, especially countries that are facing significant challenges with debt burden and again we call for more meaningful restructuring of debt.”

“It might be more prudent and may make more economic sense to re-profile the debt, reschedule the debt, (the) external debt burden,” he said. But he said that the assistance should not go into consumption, but into investment in “productive capacity (that) can be very important driver of both short-term recovery and long-term resilience”.

Richest 1% Have Two-Thirds Of New Wealth Created In The Last Two Years

Over the last two years, the richest 1% of people have accumulated close to two-thirds of all new wealth created around the world, a new report from Oxfam says.

A total of $42 trillion in new wealth has been created since 2020, with $26 trillion, or 63%, of that being amassed by the top 1% of the ultra-rich, according to the report. The remaining 99% of the global population collected just $16 trillion of new wealth, the global poverty charity says.

“A billionaire gained roughly $1.7 million for every $1 of new global wealth earned by a person in the bottom 90 percent,” the report, released as the World Economic Forum kicks off in Davos, Switzerland, reads.

It suggests that the pace at which wealth is being created has sped up, as the world’s richest 1% amassed around half of all new wealth over the past 10 years.

Oxfam’s report analyzed data on global wealth creation from Credit Suisse, as well figures from the Forbes Billionaire’s List and the Forbes Real-Time Billionaire’s list to assess changes to the wealth of the ultra-rich.

The research contrasts this wealth creation with reports from the World Bank, which said in October 2022 that it would likely not meet its goal of ending extreme poverty by 2030 as the Covid-19 pandemic slowed down efforts to combat poverty.

Gabriela Bucher, executive director of Oxfam International, called for taxes to be increased for the ultra-rich, saying that this was a “strategic precondition to reducing inequality and resuscitating democracy.”

In the report’s press release, she also said changes to taxation policies would help tackle ongoing crises around the world.

“Taxing the super-rich and big corporations is the door out of today’s overlapping crises. It’s time we demolish the convenient myth that tax cuts for the richest result in their wealth somehow ‘trickling down’ to everyone else,” Bucher said.

Coinciding crises around the world that feed into each other and produce greater adversity together than they would separately are also referred to as a “polycrisis.” In recent weeks, researchers, economists and politicians have suggested that the world is currently facing such a crisis as pressures from the cost-of-living crisis, climate change, and other pressures are colliding

5% Of Indians Own More Than 60% Of The Country’s Wealth

Just 5% of Indians own more than 60% of the country’s wealth, while the bottom 50% possess only 3% of wealth, according to Oxfam India’s latest report ‘Survival of the Richest: The India story’, which will be released today at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

An appeal

Oxfam India, an NGO that works in the sectors of child education, women empowerment and addressing inequality, through this report, seeks to urge the Union finance minister to implement progressive tax measures, such as wealth tax, in the upcoming Union Budget, it said in a press statement.

India currently does not have any wealth tax – which essentially refers to tax levied on one’s entire property in all forms.

India used to have a system under which a tax was levied at 1% on the net wealth in excess of Rs 30 lakh under the Wealth Tax Act 1957 – which was abolished in 2015. The taxation system, however, was not progressive in nature, as it did not have any slabs to ensure that the percentage of tax increased with an increase in wealth beyond the flat mark of Rs 30 lakh.

India’s richest

The total number of billionaires in India increased from 102 in 2020 to 166 billionaires in 2022.

The report highlights that the combined wealth of India’s 100 richest has touched $660 billion (Rs 54.12 lakh crore) – an amount that could fund the entire Union Budget for more than 18 months.

“While the poor face severe hardships, the wealth of the top 10 richest in India stands at Rs 27.52 lakh crore ($335.7 billion) – an increase of around 32.8% compared to 2021,” the statement said.

The wealth of the top 10 richest can finance the Ministry of Health and Family welfare and Ministry of Ayush for more than 30 years, India’s Union education budget for 26 years, or can fund MGNREGA for 38 years, it said.

Factors That Could Determine How 2023 Shapes Up For Global Equity Markets

Optimists may point out that the rate-hiking peak is on the horizon, possibly in March, with money markets expecting the Fed to switch into rate-cutting mode by the end of 2023. A Bloomberg News survey found 71 per cent of top global investors expect equities to rise in 2023.

Vincent Mortier, chief investment officer at Amundi, Europe’s largest money manager, recommends defensive positioning for investors going into the New Year. He expects a bumpy ride in 2023 but reckons “a Fed pivot in the first part of the year could trigger interesting entry points”.

But after a year that blindsided the investment community’s best and brightest, many are bracing for further reversals. One risk is that inflation stays too high for policymakers’ comfort and rate cuts don’t materialise. A Bloomberg Economics model shows a 100 per cent probability of recession starting by August, yet it looks unlikely central banks will rush in with policy easing when faced with cracks in the economy, a strategy they deployed repeatedly in the past decade.

“Policymakers, at least in the US and Europe, now appear resigned to weaker economic growth in 2023,” Deutsche Bank Private Bank’s global chief investment officer Christian Nolting told clients in a note. Recessions might be short but “will not be painless”, he warned.

Big tech troubles

A big unknown is how tech mega-caps fare, following a 35 per cent slump for the Nasdaq 100 in 2022. Companies such as Meta Platforms Inc. and Tesla Inc. have shed some two-thirds of their value, while losses at Amazon.com Inc. and Netflix Inc. neared or exceeded 50 per cent.

Expensively-valued tech stocks do suffer more when interest rates rise. But other trends that supported tech’s advance in recent years may also go into reverse – economic recession risks hitting iPhone demand while a slump in online advertising could drag on Meta and Alphabet Inc.

In Bloomberg’s annual survey, only about half the respondents said they would buy the sector – selectively.

“Some of the tech names will come back as they have done a great job convincing customers to use them, like Amazon, but others will probably never reach that peak as people have moved on,” Kim Forrest, chief investment officer at Bokeh Capital Partners, told Bloomberg Television.

Earnings recession

Previously resilient corporate profits are widely expected to crumble in 2023, as pressure builds on margins and consumer demand weakens.

“The final chapter to this bear market is all about the path of earnings estimates, which are far too high,” according to Morgan Stanley’s Mike Wilson, a Wall Street bear who predicts earnings of $180 per share in 2023 for the S&P 500, versus analysts’ expectations of $231.

The upcoming earnings recession may rival 2008, and markets are yet to price it in, he said.

China, a turning point

Beijing’s early-December decision to dismantle stringent Covid curbs seemed like a turning point for MSCI’s China Index, whose 24 per cent drop was a major contributor to global equity market losses in 2022.

Options boom

Technicals are increasingly driving day-to-day equity moves, with the S&P 500 witnessing below-average stock turnover in 2022, but explosive growth in very short-term options trading.

Professional traders and algorithmic-powered institutions have piled into such options, which were until recently dominated by small-time investors. That can make for bumpier markets, causing sudden volatility outbreaks such as the big intraday swing after October’s hot US inflation print.

Finally, with the S&P 500 failing to break out from its 2022 downtrend, short-term speculation remains skewed to the downside. But should the market turn, it will add fuel to the rebound.

India’s Billionaire Club Shrinks To 120, Gautam Adani Tops Rich List

In comparison, Ambani, who topped the list last year, has seen a 2.5 per cent decline in his family’s net worth to $101.75 billion from $104.4 billion a year ago

The year 2022 saw many lose the ‘billionaire’ tag, though some of the richest Indian promoters have become even richer. According to the report, the number of promoters with a net worth of over $1 billion has declined to 120 this year from an all-time high of 142 at the end of 2021.

Picture : Bussiness Standard

The billionaire promoters’ combined wealth is down 8.8 percent to around $685 billion ( ₹56.5 trillion) from $751.6 billion ( ₹56.62 trillion) a year ago, said the report, although it added that the fall in rupee terms is not significant owing to the currency depreciating against the US dollar.

Gautam Adani has been an outperformer in 2022, replacing Mukesh Ambani as India’s richest person. Adani’s net worth stands at $135.7 billion, up 69.6 percent from $80 billion last year, it said, citing Bloomberg data, that also highlights that he is also the richest person in Asia and third-richest in the world.

Meanwhile, Ambani has seen a 2.5 percent decline in his family’s net worth to $101.75 billion from $104.4 billion a year ago, added the report.

In fact, only three of the top 10 billionaires – Adani, Dilip Shanghvi of Sun Pharma, and Sunil Mittal of Bharti Airtel – saw an increase in the net worth this year, as per the report.

Mittal’s gains can be attributed to a rise of Bharti Airtel, which benefited from tariff hikes announced by mobile services operators, clarity over regulatory issues, and a stable business environment, mentioned the report.

While, gains for Shanghvi were driven by factors like an improved performance of Sun Pharma, which benefited from a better show in its specialty business in North America and growth in its India formulations business, added BS.

Radhakishan Damani of Avenue Supermarts (DMart), who is India’s third-richest promoter, saw a 21 percent decline in the net worth at $23.8 billion in 2022.

Other promoters in the top 10 list include Shiv Nadar of HCL Technologies, Azim Premji of Wipro and Uday Kotak of Kotak Mahindra Bank.

IRS Announces New Tax Brackets And Standard Deduction For 2023

Inflations isn’t fun, but it could help lower your taxes in 2023. The IRS has announced the new 2023 tax brackets and the new standard deduction.

The Internal Revenue Service recently announced its inflation adjustments to the standard deduction and federal income tax brackets for 2023. Knowing these numbers can allow you to make some smart tax-planning moves before the year’s end. If you expect to be in a low bracket next year, you may want to try and delay some income to next year. On the other hand, if you expect to be in a high tax bracket in 2023, you may want to delay some tax deductions until next year.

New Standard Deduction For 2023

There is some good news for taxpayers regarding inflation; in 2023, the standard deductions will increase. For married couples filing jointly, the new standard deduction for 2023 will be $27,700. This is a jump of $1,800 from the 2022 standard deduction.

The 2023 standard deduction for single taxpayers and married filing separately will be $13,850. This is a jump of $900 from the 2022 standard deduction.

You may be wondering what is the standard deduction and what does it mean? The standard deduction is the number of tax deductions you can subtract from your income before you begin to owe taxes. For example, if you were a single filer and made $13,850 in 2023, you could take the standard deduction and not owe any federal income taxes. You may still owe payroll taxes and state taxes.

For taxpayers 65 or older, you can add $1,500 to your standard deduction for 2023 if you are married. This increases to $1,850 if you are unmarried or a surviving spouse (age 65 or older in 2023).

Changes To the Federal Tax Rates For 2023

The income that fits in each tax bracket for 2023 is the only change. Put more plainly; the federal marginal tax rates will remain the same in 2023. This is unless some new legislation was to change tax rates or brackets further. Each tax bracket has been adjusted for 2023 to account for inflation.

High inflation has led the IRS to increase the federal income tax brackets. This increase in tax bracket could help lower your 2023 taxes.

2023 Tax Brackets for Single Filers

37%: incomes higher than $578,125

35%: incomes over $231,250

32%: incomes over $182,100

24%: incomes over $95,375

22%: incomes over $44,725

12%: incomes over $11,000

10%: incomes of $11,000 or less

2023 Tax Brackets for Married Couples Filing Jointly

37%: incomes higher than $693,750

35%: incomes over $462,500

32%: incomes over $364,200

24%: incomes over $190,750

22%: incomes over $89,450

12%: incomes over $22,000

10%: incomes of $22,000 or less

The marriage penalty for federal income taxes doesn’t kick in until you reach the 37% tax bracket. If you are itemizing your tax deductions, there are other limitations to tax breaks you can benefit from, as well as more examples of the marriage penalty in the tax code. For example, the $10,000 SALT cap is the same whether you are single or married.

The higher your income, the more valuable proactive tax planning guidance can be. As a Los Angeles Financial Advisor, California residents can face a combined state and federal income tax rate beyond 50% on income that falls into the highest tax brackets. The tax burden can be tough on business owners who must pay both sides of the Social Security payroll taxes. Work with your tax pro and Certified Financial Planner™ to ensure you optimize your retirement plans and minimize taxes along the way.

$2.04 Billion Powerball Jackpot Ticket Was Sold In California

A lone winning ticket for the record $2.04 billion Powerball lottery jackpot was sold in Altadena, California, lottery officials said Tuesday, making the lucky ticket holder the winner of the largest lottery prize ever, media reports stated.

The ticket was sold at a Joe’s Service Center, the California Lottery said on Twitter. Results posted to Powerball.com similarly said there was one winner who matched all six numbers in California – the odds of which were 1 in 292.2 million, according to the Multi-State Lottery Association.

The winning numbers, which were announced Tuesday morning after Monday night’s drawing was delayed, were 10-33-41-47-56 and the Powerball was 10, according to the association.

The odds of winning the jackpot in Monday’s draw are one in 292.2 million, according to Powerball. The premier lottery game has had no winner in more than three months after 40 consecutive drawings.

Here is what you need to know about the lottery and its big prize.

The previous world-record jackpot was set in 2016, when $1.59bn was split between three Powerball players.

“Like the rest of America, and the world, I think we’re all eager to find out when this historic jackpot will eventually be won,” Drew Svitko, the chair of the Powerball Product Group, said in a statement.

While no-one claimed Saturday’s winning prize, there were 16 tickets matching the five main numbers to win $1m each. Another ticket – drawn in Kentucky – won $2m , while 219 tickets across the US won $50,000 and 51 won $150,000.

Only one other Powerball jackpot reached 41 consecutive drawings. The 2021 drawing ended with a nearly $700m winner in California.

Picture: CBS

How do you play Powerball?

Powerball tickets cost $2 to buy, and a winner has the option to choose a lump sum payment, which is currently estimated at $929. Winners can also choose to receive the full amount in an annuity paid over 29 years, but almost all winners opt for the upfront cash option.

The game, which began in 1992, is played in 45 of the 50 US states, the capital city of Washington, and in the US territories of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

A ticket must match all six numbers drawn to score the jackpot. If multiple winners select the same combination of numbers in the draw, they will equally share the jackpot.

The winnings are subject to federal taxes of between 24% and 37%, and, in most cases, state taxes. Only 10 states do not have state taxes. In several locations – such as New York City – the winnings are also subject to municipal taxes.

According to BBC, the jackpot was last won on August 3rd, when the owner of the winning ticket opted for a lump sum payment of $206.9m. In July, a “Mega Millions” ticket sold in Illinois won $1.34bn.

Players have to be at least 18 years old, but some states have set the age limit at 21. Some states also allow winners to remain anonymous.

Why is there such a big jackpot?

This record-breaking jackpot is being attributed in part to changes the lottery made in 2015. To boost sales, it made smaller prizes easier to win – but the jackpot harder.

It tweaked the game, notably including having players choose five numbers from one to 69 instead of from one to 59 under the previous rules.

Players also select the Powerball – their sixth number – from one to 26, instead of the previous one to 35 .

That increased the odds for the grand prize from one in 175.2 million to the current 1 in 292.2 million.

It’s not the first time to lottery the game rules were adjusted – it has made regular changes in its 30-year history, and recently added the Monday night draw.

Can Powerball be played outside the US?

Powerball tickets can be purchased from abroad online. Participants do not need to be US citizens nor residents.

Winnings, however, need to be claimed in the state to which a ticket belongs.

For US residents, this means that those living in states that don’t participate in the Powerball would need to travel to buy a ticket and claim winnings.

Similar rules are in place for other lottery games.

In 2015, a 37-year old Iraqi man from Baghdad won a $6.4m (£5.5m) “Megabucks” jackpot in Oregon after purchasing the ticket through a Malta-based website.

Lottery winners have also been reported in a number of other countries, including Australia and El Salvador.

Who owns Powerball?

Powerball is coordinated by the Multi-State Lottery Association (MUSL), a US non-profit comprised of 38 state lotteries from across the US, Washington DC, Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands. It was formed in 1987 and launched its first game – Lotto America – the following year.

The organisation provides a number of services to its constituent members, such as game development, central accounting and the actual conduct of lottery drawings.

Money from tickets sales goes both towards the prize money and the rest to the government-run state lotteries that participate in Powerball, as well as to retailer commissions.

According to the North American Association of State and Provincial Lotteries, US lottery sales totalled over $91bn in the 2019 fiscal year.

10 Richest People Who Ever Lived

The likes of Elon Musk, Bill Gates and Gautam Adani may be worth billions, but their riches pale in comparison to the entrepreneurs, emperors and rulers of days past

Russia’s Catherine the Great and Joseph Stalin sat atop trillions, Mali’s Mansa Musa had insane amounts of gold, and Genghis Khan founded the world’s biggest empire – so who’s. 

Forbes estimates the serial tech entrepreneur’s fortune at be about US$220 billion, thanks to his portfolio of companies including electric car manufacturer Tesla, rocket producer SpaceX and tunnelling project The Boring Company.

Yet, despite his astonishing net worth, the 51-year-old’s billions don’t even come close to the wealth of the richest people in history – proportionally speaking.. Yup, that means Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Microsoft’s Bill Gates and Indian tycoons Gautam Adani and Mukesh Ambani also don’t make the cut.

It is however important to note that the further we go back in time, the harder it is to put an accurate or fair figure on how relatively rich an individual was as, well, times were much different back then. Wealth was based on gold, land, salt and power – and not all academics agree on the valuations. But we’ve done our best stocktaking, and according to several sources, and the work of a number of historians, these are richest people to ever walk the earth – after factoring in inflation and the worth of commodities in the day – in 2022 dollars.

  1. John D. Rockefeller (1839-1937)

Estimated net worth today: US$340 billion

According to numerous sources including Celebrity Net Worth, John D. Rockefeller built up a fortune that would be worth around US$340 billion in today’s money.

The American business magnate and philanthropist established the Standard Oil Company in 1870, which controlled 90 per cent of US refineries and pipelines by the early 1880s, according to the website History. While the New Yorker faced controversy for monopolising of the industry, Rockefeller also played a big part in giving back to the community, donating about US$500 million to educational, religious and scientific causes through the Rockefeller Foundation.

  1. Andrew Carnegie (1835-1919)

Estimated net worth today: US$372 billion

Money.com states that this Scottish-born industrialist stacked up the equivalent of around US$372 billion by leading the expansion of the American steel industry in the 19th and early 20th century.

He eventually sold his Carnegie Steel company in 1901 to JP Morgan for US$480 million (in the currency of the day). Carnegie also donated 90 per cent of his earnings to philanthropic causes by the time of his death in 1919.

  1. Catherine the Great (1729-1796)

Estimated net worth today: US$1.5 trillion

The Russian monarch inherited and controlled a vast network of land, wealth and political power, after assuming the throne in 1762 – investments worth 5 per cent of Russian GDP, or the equivalent of US$1.5 trillion today, according to Luxuo.

  1. Augustus Caesar (63BC-14AD)

Estimated net worth today: US$4.6 trillion

the founder of the Roman empire needs no introduction as one of the greatest and most famous rulers in history.

Augustus Caesar’s empire produced around 25 to 30 per cent of the world’s global output, and around a fifth of that was his own personal wealth, according to Luxuo. That means he would have been worth around US$4.6 trillion today.

  1. Joseph Stalin (1878-1953)

Estimated net worth today: US$7.5 trillion

Money.com says that it’s virtually impossible to separate Stalin’s wealth from the wealth of the Soviet Union, with economists claiming that his complete control of the USSR makes him one of the richest people to ever live.

Data from The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) indicates that in 1950, the USSR made up about 9.5 per cent of the global economic output (about US$7.5 trillion in today’s money).

Though Stalin didn’t technically “own” the money, he did have the power to “control the wealth of the country”, points out George O. Liber, a professor of history at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

  1. Empress Wu (624-705)

Estimated net worth today: US$16 trillion

he first and only female emperor of China was intelligent, politically savvy – and famous for being ruthless when it came to bumping off her opponents. She ruled the country when the economy of China accounted for around 23 per cent of global GDP, which would be around US$16 trillion today. Despite her sometimes controversial methods of wielding power, she nevertheless built up the country’s wealth by trading tea and silk on the Silk Road, and oversaw the expansion of Imperial China into central Asia. Some call her the richest woman ever.

Genghis Khan, John D. Rockefeller, Mansa Musa, Empress Wu and Catherine the Great all had immense wealth. Photos: Handout; Shutterstock; @Dr_TheHistories/Twitter; Mary Evans Picture Library; @catherinee_thee_greatt/Instagram

  1. Akbar I (1542-1605)

Estimated net worth today: US$21 trillion

Akbar I lived far more extravagantly than European leaders with equivalent wealth at the time. 

Abu’l-Fath Jalal-ud-din Muhammad Akbar, popularly known as Akbar the Great, was the third emperor to rule the Mughal empire.

Thanks to his ability to extract wealth from the population, Money.com claims that he ruled over an empire valued at 25 per cent of the global GDP. Comparable to the wealth of Elizabethan England at the time, the extravagance of Akbar I’s lifestyle nevertheless easily “surpassed that of the European society”, according to economic historian Angus Maddison.

  1. Emperor Shenzong (1048-1085)

Estimated net worth today: US$30 trillion

The sixth emperor of China’s Song dynasty ruled over an immensely economically powerful empire worth 25 to 30 per cent of the world’s GDP at the time, according to Money.com. Historians claim that the kingdom was light-years ahead of European governments when it came to effective tax collection, and its technological innovations and centralised form of governance also added to their wealth.

  1. Genghis Khan (1162-1227)

Estimated net worth today: US$120 trillion

It is believed that Genghis Khan was so powerful, and his Mongol empire so wide-reaching, that his DNA can be found in as many as 16 million men today, according to a 2003 scientific report.

And, having created the largest empire of all time – which covered most of China and Central Asia during his lifetime, and stretched as far as Poland and Vietnam afterward – The Richest estimates that he would have been worth about US$120 trillion in today’s money.

It is believed that Genghis Khan was so powerful, and his Mongol empire so wide-reaching, that his DNA can be found in as many as 16 million men today, according to a 2003 scientific report.

And, having created the largest empire of all time – which covered most of China and Central Asia during his lifetime, and stretched as far as Poland and Vietnam afterward – The Richest estimates that he would have been worth about US$120 trillion in today’s money.

  1. Mansa Musa (1280-1337)

Estimated net worth … “Incomprehensible”

Mansa Musa is considered the richest man to have ever lived, according to historians.

Coming in strong at No 1 is a name that you may not even recognize. Mansa Musa was the ruler of the Mali empire, which was immensely rich in land, salt and gold. Historians estimate the Mali Empire was at one point the largest gold producer in the world, meaning its ruler was in possession of “incomprehensible wealth”. While Celebrity Net Worth has estimated his wealth to have been the equivalent of around US$400 billion, historians believe it’s virtually impossible to come to a conclusion on the real number.

The African ruler was famous for making the most extravagant pilgrimage to Mecca of all time, with the BBC reporting that the king left Mali with about 60,000 men, from royal officials to camel drivers and slaves. He spent so much gold in Cairo during his three month stay there that he destabilized the local economy, affecting the price of gold in the region for the next 10 years!

Today’s Richest

Right now, Elon Musk is by far the richest person on earth. Tesla boss Elon Musk’s immense fortune pales into insignificance compared to the richest people in history. 

Forbes estimates the serial tech entrepreneur’s fortune at be about US$220 billion, thanks to his portfolio of companies including electric car manufacturer Tesla, rocket producer SpaceX and tunnelling project The Boring Company.

Yet, despite his astonishing net worth, the 51-year-old’s billions don’t even come close to the wealth of the richest people in history – proportionally speaking.. Yup, that means Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Microsoft’s Bill Gates and Indian tycoons Gautam Adani and Mukesh Ambani also don’t make the cut.

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos is currently the second richest person on the planet – but not necessarily the second richest of all time. Photo: AP

It is however important to note that the further we go back in time, the harder it is to put an accurate or fair figure on how relatively rich an individual was as, well, times were much different back then. Wealth was based on gold, land, salt and power – and not all academics agree on the valuations.

But we’ve done our best stocktaking, and according to several sources, and the work of a number of historians, these are richest people to ever walk the earth – after factoring in inflation and the worth of commodities in the day – in 2022 dollars. (Courtesy: Forbes)

Picture: Life Byond Post

Chinese Yuan Becomes World’s Fifth Most Traded Currency, Survey Finds

The Chinese currency, yuan leaped over the Australian, Canadian and Swiss currencies to become the fifth most traded currency in the world, according to the Bank for International Settlements’ Triennial Central Bank Survey.

The Chinese yuan has become the world’s fifth most traded currency, jumping from eighth place three years ago, according to a Bank for International Settlements (BIS) report, as the renminbi continues to gain international traction amid heightened geopolitical tensions.

The Chinese currency was involved in 7% of all trades in 2022, compared with 4% three years ago, Basel-based BIS said in a report on Thursday. Meanwhile, total daily trades rose 14% to $7.5 trillion. 

The dollar maintained its decade-long place as the world’s most traded currency, accounting for one side of 88% of all transactions. The euro, yen and pound also held their spots in the top four.

According to Bloomberg News, the yuan is becoming a more important global currency as China takes steps to open its financial markets. This is reflected in an increase in yuan cross-border settlements as well as a higher share of yuan among global FX reserves.

Bloomberg says the increase in cross-border yuan settlements, as well as the higher share among global foreign exchange reserves, is due to Beijing’s moves to open up its financial markets.

The BIS survey covered more than 1,200 banks and other intermediaries worldwide. Russia, which accounted for less than 1% of the global total in 2019, was excluded this year, while Dubai was included for the first time.

Movie Star Anna May Wong To Be First Asian American Featured On US Currency

Movie star Anna May Wong, who broke into Hollywood during the silent film era, will become the first Asian American to appear on US currency, a century after she landed her first leading role. Wong’s image, with her trademark blunt bangs and pencil-thin eyebrows, will feature on the back of new quarters from October 24th, 2022.

The design is the fifth to emerge from the American Women Quarters Program, which highlights pioneering women in their respective fields. The other four quarters, all put into production this year, feature poet and activist Maya Angelou; the first American woman in space, Sally Ride; Cherokee Nation leader Wilma Mankiller; and suffragist Nina Otero-Warren. The latter two were, along with Wong, selected with input from the public.

“These inspiring coin designs tell the stories of five extraordinary women whose contributions are indelibly etched in American culture,” the US Mint’s acting director, Alison Doone, said in a statement to CNN last year, when the list was revealed.

Considered the movie industry’s first Chinese American star, Wong overcame widespread discrimination to carve out a four-decade career in film, theater and radio. She acted alongside icons including Marlene Dietrich, Joan Crawford and Laurence Olivier and appeared on stage in London and New York.

Born in Los Angeles, she began acting at 14 and took a lead role in “The Toll of the Sea” three years later, in 1922. She went on to appear in dozens of movies but faced deeply entrenched racism in Hollywood, where she struggled to break from stereotypical roles.

She moved to Europe in the 1920s, but later returned to the US to make hits including “Shanghai Express,” the 1932 adventure-romance movie that gave Wong one of her best-known roles — it starred Dietrich as a notorious courtesan who takes a three-day rail journey through China during the Chinese Civil War and is held hostage on board, with Wong playing a fellow first-class passenger.

Throughout her life, Wong advocated for greater representation of Asian American actors in Hollywood. She received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame in 1960, the year before she died aged 56.

Her keen sense of style also made her a fashion icon, with Wong often mixing traditional Chinese gowns and flapper-era styles with eccentric touches. A biopic of the actor’s life, which will see her portrayed by “Crazy Rich Asians” star Gemma Chan, is currently in production.

“Many prominent actors from the 1920s and 1930s saw their name framed by lightbulbs on movie theater marquees, so I thought it made sense to feature Anna May Wong in this way,” said the coin’s designer, Emily Damstra, in a press release.

“Along with the hard work, determination, and skill Anna May Wong brought to the profession of acting, I think it was her face and expressive gestures that really captivated movie audiences, so I included these elements next to her name.”

The American Women Quarters program will choose five different women each year to be featured on the coin’s reverse side through 2025. Next year’s confirmed designs will spotlight pilot Bessie Coleman, composer Edith Kanakaʻole, former first lady Eleanor Roosevelt, journalist and activist Jovita Idar and ballerina Maria Tallchief. (The Hill)

New IRS Rules Mean Your Paycheck Could Be Bigger Next Year

Inflation may be pushing prices up, but it also may help push up your take-home pay starting next year.

Thanks to inflation adjustments to 2023 federal income tax brackets and other provisions announced by the Internal Revenue Service this week, more of your 2023 wages may be subject to lower tax rates than they were this year, and you may be able to deduct higher amounts of income.

“It is very likely that you would see more in your paycheck starting in January [due to the IRS inflation adjustments, which] tend to result in lower withholding for a given level of income,” said Mark Luscombe, principal federal tax analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting.

Since the changes don’t apply until 2023, they won’t have any affect on your 2022 tax return that you must file by mid-April of next year.

Here are some of the big changes the IRS is making:

Income tax brackets

  • There are seven different federal income tax rates at which earned income is taxed: 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35% and 37%. And the range of income subject to each of those rates is called a tax bracket.
  • The more you earn, the higher your “top” rate – that’s the rate at which your last dollar is taxed.
  • The IRS inflation adjustments amount to a roughly 7% increase in each bracket.
  • Starting next year, here are the amounts of income that will apply to each rate:
  • 10% applies to the first $11,000 of income for single filers ($22,000 for married couples filing jointly).
  • 12% applies to income over $11,000 ($22,000 for joint filers)
  • 22% applies to income over $44,725 ($89,450 for joint filers)
  • 24% applies to incomes over $95,375 ($190,750 for joint filers)
  • 32% applies to incomes over $182,100 ($364,200 for joint filers)
  • 37% applies to incomes over $578,125 ($693,750 for joint filers)

Standard deduction

The standard deduction, which most filers claim, will go up by $900 to $13,850 for single people and by $1,800 to $27,700 for married couples filing jointly.

The standard deduction is the dollar amount that those who don’t itemize deductions can subtract from their adjustable gross income before federal income tax is applied.

Healthcare Flexible Spending Account contribution limits

Next year, you will be allowed to contribute up to $3,050 to a flexible spending account, which can cover some out-of-pocket healthcare costs not covered by health insurance. That money is deductible so it will reduce the amount of tax taken out of your paycheck. If your employer’s plan also allows you to carry over unused portions of your FSA amount, the maximum carryover permitted will be $610, $40 higher than this year’s maximum.

Earned Income Tax Credit

The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) enables low-income workers to keep more of their paycheck. However, they will not get paid the money until they file their 2023 taxes in early 2024.

The IRS raised the maximum amounts one can claim for the EITC by about 7%.

For example, a qualifying taxpayer with three or more qualifying children could get an EITC of up to $7,430 in 2023, up from $6,935 this year.

India Cancels Foreign Contribution Regulation Act License Of Rajiv Gandhi Foundation

India’s Union Home Ministry has cancelled the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) licence of Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (RGF), a non-governmental organisation headed by Sonia Gandhi, for allegedly violating the foreign funding law.

The foundation will no longer be allowed to receive foreign funds.

According to sources, the FCRA license of the foundation has been cancelled due to violation of foreign funding rules. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) had also constituted a committee in 2020 to probe this. This decision has been taken on the basis of the report by the same inquiry committee.

The trustees of the organization include former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and MPs Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra.

According to sources, the RGF came under the scanner in July, 2020. The MHA then constituted an inter-ministerial committee headed by an Enforcement Directorate (ED) officer to investigate NGOs, including the RGF, linked to the Gandhi family. The foundation was accused of tampering with income tax returns, including suspected FCRA violations.

The RGF was established in 1991. For many years, this foundation worked on important issues regarding health, science and technology, women, children and education, etc.

In 2020, BJP President J.P. Nadda also alleged that the foundation took such funds from China, “which were not in the interest of the country”. (IANS)

Loan Forgiveness Application Available For Students Now

The Department of Education launched a beta test version of its student loan relief website on Friday with an application that borrowers can fill out ahead of the site’s official launch later this month.

Since August, when President Biden announced that he would fulfill his campaign promise to cancel up to $20,000 in student loan debt, borrowers have been waiting diligently to hear the next steps. While the application—which was originally supposed to open in early October—is not fully functional, the Department of Education is welcoming applicants to submit their applications on the beta test site.

The beta site’s application will be available “on and off” over the next few weeks, according to the Education Department. The department chose to launch its beta version early so their technical team can work to detect and remedy any issues that might come up

How does the beta application process go?

The federal agency said that there’s no advantage to completing the application before its official launch because it won’t be processed until then, but if a borrower fills out the application during the beta period, they won’t have to worry about filling it out again later. 

The application process takes about 5 minutes, and it’s available in English and Spanish. Applicants also don’t need to log in or provide any documents, according to the department. About 95% of federal student loan borrowers are eligible for relief.

The Education Department’s technical team will be responding to potential issues in real-time, and although the application itself won’t change, the team may make changes to the website if faced with any glitches. 

The beta version of the site will have scheduled pauses for the team to observe its progress and refine any errors, so the department is encouraging applicants to check back later if the site is down when they try to visit it. The department’s website crashed in August on the day of the student loan relief announcement, so the department is likely testing the site thoroughly to avoid a repeat.

How quickly are borrowers expected to receive relief?

The Biden administration initially said that the debt relief application would become available in early October, but in a legal filing on Friday, the Department of Education announced that it won’t be available before Oct. 23. From that point, the application will be available until Dec. 31, 2023.

​​The application asks borrowers to submit their Social Security numbers and to corroborate that they meet the income caps for the program, which are limited to a salary less than $125,000, or under $250,000 for married couples, in 2020 or 2021. Borrowers are eligible to cancel $10,000 of federal student loan debt and Pell Grant recipients are eligible for up to $20,000 of relief.

The Federal Student Aid office will confirm applicants’ eligibility, and reach out to applicants if more information is needed. Applicants’ loan service providers will be responsible for contacting them once their relief has been processed.

Borrowers can expect to see their relief granted within four to six weeks after filling out the application, according to Education Secretary, Miguel Cardona. With looming legal action challenging the student loan relief program and an imminent renewal of student loan payments beginning in January, experts have encouraged borrowers to fill out the application as soon as possible.

Rupee Plunges To All-Time Low Against Dollar

The Indian Rupee pared most of its initial losses and settled 4 paise lower at a fresh lifetime low of ₹82.34 (provisional) against the U.S. dollar on Monday, October 10, 2022, weighed down by as risk-averse sentiment among investors.

Indian rupee on Friday last week fell sharply to its all-time low of 82.33 against the dollar owing to a rise in US bond yields and firming up of crude oil prices. Rupee had closed at 81.89 on Thursday.

It was trading at 82.30 against the dollar in the morning after opening at 82.19 a dollar. Later, it touched an all-time low of 82.33 against the dollar.

The all-time low plunge in the rupee has come a day after the World Bank had on Thursday cut India’s growth forecast for this financial year by a full percentage point amid rising inflation and adverse geo-political conditions. (IANS)

The US dollar has surged this year. The world’s largest wealth manager explains why that dizzying rally isn’t done yet.

Meanwhile market watchers say, the surging US dollar has yet to peak. That’s according to UBS, which thinks the Federal Reserve is unlikely to start cutting interest rates any time soon, keeping the dollar rising against rival currencies globally. 

The greenback has already flown up 16.7% this year, bolstered by Fed rate hikes and weaknesses among major counterparts. But hopes of a pivot in the Fed’s policy pumped the brakes on its rise recently, with the US dollar index, which measures the buck against a basket of six currencies, retreating on the speculation fueled by a fall in US job openings and a lower-than-expected rate increase in Australia.

However, UBS’s analysts, led by CIO Mark Haefele, said in a note to clients this week that it’s too early to call a peak in both Fed hawkishness and the US dollar. 

“The number of job openings in the US remains much higher than those unemployed, while the latest core personal consumption expenditure price index showed that inflation is still elevated,” the note read. 

“Fed officials including Chair Jerome Powell have stressed that the central bank’s job is not yet done.” 

Against a backdrop of global uncertainty amid the war in Ukraine, the pressure weighing on the euro is likely to prop up the dollar in the near future, UBS says. 

S&P 500 Down 20% This Year, Retirement Savings Sink Impacting Millions

Despite stock market gains in the last couple of days, some investors are clearly tired of seeing losses in their retirement accounts this year. New data from Alight Solutions shows last month the vast majority of daily trades in 401(k) plans went from equities to fixed income.

“Almost every time Wall Street has a major dip, we see people taking their money out of stocks and moving it into bonds,” said Rob Austin, head of research for Alight Solutions, which measures the daily trading activity of more than 2 million 401(k) investors, with about $200 billion in assets.

Austin noted the movement was more pronounced in September than in August and July. “It was not surprising that it coincided at the time that the market fell,” he said.

Investors are seeking safety

Investors sought safety mostly in stable value funds, with 80% of traded assets put there in September, according to the Alight Solutions 401(k) Index. Money market funds garnered 15% of inflows, while bond funds got about 2% of assets.

Meanwhile, 50% of money that was traded came out target date funds, which are designed to invest more conservatively as you get older. And more than a third of outflows came out of large-cap U.S. equity and mid-cap U.S. equity funds.

Many stick with a 60/40 stocks, bonds split

The traditional portfolio of 60% stocks and 40% bonds has lost about 20% of its value year to date, but most investment advisors recommend sticking with a balanced strategy. With bond yields improving, that mix looks better than it has in years, some say.

Financial advisors also caution against switching strategies when the markets are in turmoil. Trying to time the market can mean investors lock in losses and miss out on the upside.

“If you wake up in the morning and decide to cash out and capture losses, it’s either too late or a bad decision,” said certified financial planner Jon Ulin with Ulin & Co. Wealth Management in Boca Raton, Florida. “Cash does not provide much in the way of a dividend and will not help to make up for 8% losses to inflation over time in as much as a diversified portfolio.” 

The 60/40 split can be a good starting point for moderate-risk investors who don’t need to pull the money for 10 years or more.  Some advisors say what we saw this year with stocks and bonds both declining at the same time could be an anomaly.

“Provided that inflation is under control, we expect that bonds will revert to their historical role of both a safe asset and one that provides relatively safe income,” said Arthur J.W. Ebersole of Ebersole Financial in Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts.

Cash is an option for the risk averse

For investors who really can’t stomach the risk, cash may not be a bad placeholder for now. But the risk adverse should know it is difficult to generate the returns they will need to retire with a 3% return.  

“It’s really easy for my teammates [and I], or our industry, to say, ‘Well, don’t worry, just take the long-term approach and everything over the long-term will be fine,’” said Jason Ray, CEO of Zenith Wealth Partners in Philadelphia.

Ray suggests investors break down their portfolios to see the returns in different asset classes. He recommends adding dividend-paying stocks as a value play and suggests younger investors with a longer time horizon add alternative investments, including investing in early stage startup companies and real estate.  (https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/04/sp-500-down-20percent-for-year-retirement-investors-reconsider-stock-bond-strategy-.html)

Pound Plunges Against Dollar

By, Jill Lawless And Danica Kirka

UK markets were in focus as the pound crashed to an all-time low and bond yields surged to the highest in more than a decade, sparking talk of emergency action by the Bank of England on Monday, September 26th. The market mayhem unleashed by the government’s fiscal plan on Friday went into overdrive after the government pledged further tax cuts.

The Bank of England sought to reassure financial markets after the British pound touched an all-time low against the U.S. dollar, but its entreaty fell flat for investors concerned about a sweeping package of tax cuts that further jolted a faltering economy that the government’s plan was meant to prop up.

The central bank said it was “closely monitoring” the markets and would not hesitate to boost interest rates to curb inflation. Its statement came after the pound plunged as low as $1.0373, the lowest since the decimalization of the currency in 1971, on concerns that tax cuts announced Friday by Treasury chief Kwasi Kwarteng would swell government debt and fuel further inflation as the United Kingdom teeters toward recession.

The bank, which raised rates Thursday, said it would fully assess the government’s tax and spending commitments before it meets next in November and “will not hesitate to change interest rates by as much as needed to return inflation to the 2% target sustainably in the medium term.”

Also Monday, the U.K. Treasury said it would set out a medium-term fiscal plan on Nov. 23, alongside an economic forecast by the independent Office for Budget Responsibility.

The statements did little to ease misgivings about the government’s economic policies, with the pound dropping from $1.0857 to $1.0664 after they were issued. The pound had rallied from the record low earlier in the day on expectations that the central bank might take action to stabilize the currency.

The weakening pound piles pressure on the new Conservative government, which has gambled that it can slash taxes to spur economic growth while at the same time borrowing billions of pounds to help consumers and businesses struggling with soaring energy costs. Many economists say it’s more likely to fuel already high inflation, push down the pound and drive up the cost of U.K. government borrowing — a potential perfect storm of economic headwinds.

Kwarteng has been criticized for failing to release any independent analysis of the plans when he announced the U.K.’s biggest tax cuts in 50 years.

The government plans to cut 45 billion pounds ($49 billion) in taxes at the same time as it spends more than 60 billion pounds to cap energy prices that are driving a cost-of-living crisis.

Kwarteng and Prime Minister Liz Truss, who replaced Boris Johnson as prime minister on Sept. 6, are betting that lower taxes and reduced bureaucracy eventually will generate enough additional tax revenue to cover government spending. Economists suggest it is unlikely the gamble will pay off.

Opposition Labour Party economy spokeswoman Rachel Reeves accused the government of “a return to trickle-down economics, an idea that has been tried, has been tested and has failed.”

“They are not gambling with their money — they are gambling with yours,” she told an audience at the party’s annual conference Monday.

The new and untested Truss also faces pressure from a nervous Conservative Party, which faces an election within two years.

Some Conservatives have welcomed the tax-cutting moves as a return to free-market values after years of state intervention in the economy during the coronavirus pandemic. But others worry it is unconservative for the government to rack up huge debts that taxpayers will eventually have to pay.

Monday’s turbulence follows a 3% fall in the pound Friday, the biggest one-day drop against the U.S. dollar since Johnson announced Britain’s first COVID-19 lockdown on March 18, 2020. Before that, the pound lost more than 10% of its value immediately after the U.K. voted to leave the European Union in June 2016 before rebounding.

The sense of a government losing control led some to compare current events with Sept. 16, 1992 — “Black Wednesday” — when a collapsing pound against the backdrop of high inflation forced the U.K. to crash out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, which was meant to stabilize exchange rates. It took the U.K. years to recover from the economic shock.

Kwarteng insisted the government was acting responsibly — and said there were more tax cuts to come.

“We’ve only been here 19 days. I want to see, over the next year, people retain more of their income because I believe that it is the British people that are going to drive this economy,” he told the BBC.

As it is cutting taxes, the government plans to cap electricity and natural gas prices for homes and businesses to help cushion price rises that have been triggered by Russia’s war in Ukraine and have sent inflation to a near 40-year high of 9.9%.

This program will cost 60 billion pounds, and the government will borrow to finance it, Kwarteng said Friday.

He said Sunday that it was the right policy because the government needed to help consumers squeezed by the unprecedented pressures caused by the war in Ukraine and the pandemic.

Britain can afford the cost because its debt as a percentage of gross domestic product is the second lowest among the Group of Seven large industrial economies, Kwarteng said. He said the government would announce a “medium-term fiscal plan” for reducing the nation’s debt in the coming months.

Rupee Nosedives As Dollar Continues To Gain

A hattrick of record low: The rupee plunged 54 paise to provisionally close at a new all-time low of 81.63 against the US dollar on Monday. It had ended at its lowest ever on both Thursday and Friday, making Monday’s deeper plunge the third successive record low levels in three sessions.

There’s panic: It has been created by the dollar index, which has witnessed strong buying as a strong hedge against interest rate hikes and inflation cycle. The downtrend may continue for the rupee until positive triggers are not witnessed from the inflation forefront, experts feel.

The main story: The dollar has become profitable as the US Fed is hiking rates to tame inflationary trends in its market. The dollar rally reflects the ‘flight-to-safety’ approach by investors. As a result the Asian markets have become riskier and are experiencing crisis-level stress again. Two most significant Asian currencies — the yen and the yuan — have been falling under the dollar’s assault. The US is hawkish, the Asians are dovish.

RBI has a job to do: Its monetary policy committee (MPC) is meeting this week and is expected to hike rates by 50 basis points. Market experts feel this could provide some respite to the rupee but it still may lie in the 80.50-81.50 range.

Pressure on forex: RBI has been holding the rupee for quite some time through rate hikes and by selling dollars from its foreign exchange reserves. But this meant that India’s foreign exchange reserves fell below $550 billion for the first time in nearly two years last week, which marked the seventh successive week of forex decline.

And shares? The 30-share BSE index tanked 953.70 points to settle at 57,145, recovering after plummeting 1,061 points during the day. The NSE Nifty fell 311.05 points to close at 17,016. In the last four sessions, the Sensex has lost about 2,575 points and the market capitalisation of the BSE-listed companies reduced by over Rs 13.3 lakh crore.  (Times Of India)

Biden’s Student Loan Forgiveness Plan To Cost $400 Billion

President Joe Biden’s plan to forgive $10,000 in federal student debt for most borrowers will cost the government about $400 billion, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said in an estimate released Monday.

The CBO’s evaluation of the administration’s policy said the price tag is “a result of the action canceling up to $10,000 of debt issued on or before June 30, 2022.”

The estimate applies to the plan Biden announced last month to forgive $10,000 in federal student loan debt for borrowers earning less than $125,000 and $20,000 for borrowers who received Pell Grants.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said 43 million borrowers shared $1.6 trillion in federal student loan debt as of June 30. Under Biden’s plan, about $430 billion of that debt will be wiped out, the reporting shows.

The CBO also estimated the costs for the Biden administration’s recent renewal of the moratorium on federal student loan payments and interest accrual, which had been set to lapse at the end of August. The extension, which punts the deadline to the end of the year, was projected to cost $20 billion in the new report. 

As of the end of June, 43 million borrowers held $1.6 trillion in federal student loans and about $430 billion of that debt will be canceled, the CBO estimated. The White House, borrowing language from the CBO analysis, responded by focusing on the agency’s own assessment that its $400 billion estimate was “highly uncertain.”

“CBO called its own estimate ‘highly uncertain.’ We agree,'” the White House said in a memo. “By law, the federal budget computes the complete cost of student loan relief over the lifetime of the loans, and then records that cost in the year the loans are modified,” the memo continued. “But that’s not how this program will affect the bottom line in reality. The cost to the government is not the long-term score, but rather, the annual lost receipts.”

Biden’s Student Loan Forgiveness Plan To Cost $400 Billion

President Joe Biden’s plan to forgive $10,000 in federal student debt for most borrowers will cost the government about $400 billion, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said in an estimate released Monday.

The CBO’s evaluation of the administration’s policy said the price tag is “a result of the action canceling up to $10,000 of debt issued on or before June 30, 2022.”

The estimate applies to the plan Biden announced last month to forgive $10,000 in federal student loan debt for borrowers earning less than $125,000 and $20,000 for borrowers who received Pell Grants.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said 43 million borrowers shared $1.6 trillion in federal student loan debt as of June 30. Under Biden’s plan, about $430 billion of that debt will be wiped out, the reporting shows.

The CBO also estimated the costs for the Biden administration’s recent renewal of the moratorium on federal student loan payments and interest accrual, which had been set to lapse at the end of August. The extension, which punts the deadline to the end of the year, was projected to cost $20 billion in the new report.

As of the end of June, 43 million borrowers held $1.6 trillion in federal student loans and about $430 billion of that debt will be canceled, the CBO estimated. The White House, borrowing language from the CBO analysis, responded by focusing on the agency’s own assessment that its $400 billion estimate was “highly uncertain.”

“CBO called its own estimate ‘highly uncertain.’ We agree,'” the White House said in a memo. “By law, the federal budget computes the complete cost of student loan relief over the lifetime of the loans, and then records that cost in the year the loans are modified,” the memo continued. “But that’s not how this program will affect the bottom line in reality. The cost to the government is not the long-term score, but rather, the annual lost receipts.”

Rupee Nosedives As Dollar Continues To Gain

A hattrick of record low: The rupee plunged 54 paise to provisionally close at a new all-time low of 81.63 against the US dollar on Monday. It had ended at its lowest ever on both Thursday and Friday, making Monday’s deeper plunge the third successive record low levels in three sessions.

There’s panic: It has been created by the dollar index, which has witnessed strong buying as a strong hedge against interest rate hikes and inflation cycle. The downtrend may continue for the rupee until positive triggers are not witnessed from the inflation forefront, experts feel.

The main story: The dollar has become profitable as the US Fed is hiking rates to tame inflationary trends in its market. The dollar rally reflects the ‘flight-to-safety’ approach by investors. As a result the Asian markets have become riskier and are experiencing crisis-level stress again. Two most significant Asian currencies — the yen and the yuan — have been falling under the dollar’s assault. The US is hawkish, the Asians are dovish.

RBI has a job to do: Its monetary policy committee (MPC) is meeting this week and is expected to hike rates by 50 basis points. Market experts feel this could provide some respite to the rupee but it still may lie in the 80.50-81.50 range.

Pressure on forex: RBI has been holding the rupee for quite some time through rate hikes and by selling dollars from its foreign exchange reserves. But this meant that India’s foreign exchange reserves fell below $550 billion for the first time in nearly two years last week, which marked the seventh successive week of forex decline.

And shares? The 30-share BSE index tanked 953.70 points to settle at 57,145, recovering after plummeting 1,061 points during the day. The NSE Nifty fell 311.05 points to close at 17,016. In the last four sessions, the Sensex has lost about 2,575 points and the market capitalisation of the BSE-listed companies reduced by over Rs 13.3 lakh crore.  (Times Of India)

Pound Plunges Against Dollar

UK markets were in focus as the pound crashed to an all-time low and bond yields surged to the highest in more than a decade, sparking talk of emergency action by the Bank of England on Monday, September 26th. The market mayhem unleashed by the government’s fiscal plan on Friday went into overdrive after the government pledged further tax cuts.

The Bank of England sought to reassure financial markets after the British pound touched an all-time low against the U.S. dollar, but its entreaty fell flat for investors concerned about a sweeping package of tax cuts that further jolted a faltering economy that the government’s plan was meant to prop up.

The central bank said it was “closely monitoring” the markets and would not hesitate to boost interest rates to curb inflation. Its statement came after the pound plunged as low as $1.0373, the lowest since the decimalization of the currency in 1971, on concerns that tax cuts announced Friday by Treasury chief Kwasi Kwarteng would swell government debt and fuel further inflation as the United Kingdom teeters toward recession.

The bank, which raised rates Thursday, said it would fully assess the government’s tax and spending commitments before it meets next in November and “will not hesitate to change interest rates by as much as needed to return inflation to the 2% target sustainably in the medium term.”

Also Monday, the U.K. Treasury said it would set out a medium-term fiscal plan on Nov. 23, alongside an economic forecast by the independent Office for Budget Responsibility.

The statements did little to ease misgivings about the government’s economic policies, with the pound dropping from $1.0857 to $1.0664 after they were issued. The pound had rallied from the record low earlier in the day on expectations that the central bank might take action to stabilize the currency.

The weakening pound piles pressure on the new Conservative government, which has gambled that it can slash taxes to spur economic growth while at the same time borrowing billions of pounds to help consumers and businesses struggling with soaring energy costs. Many economists say it’s more likely to fuel already high inflation, push down the pound and drive up the cost of U.K. government borrowing — a potential perfect storm of economic headwinds.

Kwarteng has been criticized for failing to release any independent analysis of the plans when he announced the U.K.’s biggest tax cuts in 50 years.

The government plans to cut 45 billion pounds ($49 billion) in taxes at the same time as it spends more than 60 billion pounds to cap energy prices that are driving a cost-of-living crisis.

Kwarteng and Prime Minister Liz Truss, who replaced Boris Johnson as prime minister on Sept. 6, are betting that lower taxes and reduced bureaucracy eventually will generate enough additional tax revenue to cover government spending. Economists suggest it is unlikely the gamble will pay off.

Opposition Labour Party economy spokeswoman Rachel Reeves accused the government of “a return to trickle-down economics, an idea that has been tried, has been tested and has failed.”

“They are not gambling with their money — they are gambling with yours,” she told an audience at the party’s annual conference Monday.

The new and untested Truss also faces pressure from a nervous Conservative Party, which faces an election within two years.

Some Conservatives have welcomed the tax-cutting moves as a return to free-market values after years of state intervention in the economy during the coronavirus pandemic. But others worry it is unconservative for the government to rack up huge debts that taxpayers will eventually have to pay.

Monday’s turbulence follows a 3% fall in the pound Friday, the biggest one-day drop against the U.S. dollar since Johnson announced Britain’s first COVID-19 lockdown on March 18, 2020. Before that, the pound lost more than 10% of its value immediately after the U.K. voted to leave the European Union in June 2016 before rebounding.

The sense of a government losing control led some to compare current events with Sept. 16, 1992 — “Black Wednesday” — when a collapsing pound against the backdrop of high inflation forced the U.K. to crash out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, which was meant to stabilize exchange rates. It took the U.K. years to recover from the economic shock.

Kwarteng insisted the government was acting responsibly — and said there were more tax cuts to come.

“We’ve only been here 19 days. I want to see, over the next year, people retain more of their income because I believe that it is the British people that are going to drive this economy,” he told the BBC.

As it is cutting taxes, the government plans to cap electricity and natural gas prices for homes and businesses to help cushion price rises that have been triggered by Russia’s war in Ukraine and have sent inflation to a near 40-year high of 9.9%.

This program will cost 60 billion pounds, and the government will borrow to finance it, Kwarteng said Friday.

He said Sunday that it was the right policy because the government needed to help consumers squeezed by the unprecedented pressures caused by the war in Ukraine and the pandemic.

Britain can afford the cost because its debt as a percentage of gross domestic product is the second lowest among the Group of Seven large industrial economies, Kwarteng said. He said the government would announce a “medium-term fiscal plan” for reducing the nation’s debt in the coming months.

Repel The Recession With These 5 Tips

It doesn’t hurt your bottom line to take a step back and self-evaluate. Learn how you’ll be able to repel the recession with these 5 tips.

While the professional pundits debate when or if an economic recession is imminent, it may be a good idea to ensure you’re prepared, nonetheless. It doesn’t hurt your bottom line to take a step back and self-evaluate. Learn how you’ll be able to repel the recession with these 5 tips.

Live Your Life Within Your Means

Many of you may already live your everyday lives with this money-management strategy and if you do, then you’re ahead of the curve. But let’s be honest, we all know people who do not live within their means. Saying ‘no’ when deciding on an unneeded purchase is a skill that sometimes needs to be learned.

It’s important to carefully weigh all decisions about money, especially if a recession is looming. Don’t get caught in the trap of thinking the recession may not last long. The more conscious you are about spending habits, the more you can avoid going into debt with credit cards and loans. It’s better to save now and put off making big purchases, then to build up your debt and struggle to get out from under it later in life. Speaking of saving…

Look For Ways to Save

It’s always a good idea to audit your own finances. Most people are aware of their paycheck, but they are often fuzzy about the money that leaves their account. Re-evaluate your monthly subscriptions. Do you need every single streaming service? How often do you make coffee runs to your local café? It might be time to brew a cup from home.

Divide your monthly expenses into wants and needs. Make sure you’re not overpaying for those wants. Cut down on the trips to the restaurants. If you had any planned vacations or renovations, it might be in your best interest to postpone. Perhaps we learned all those money-saving tricks during the 2020 quarantine for a reason. It might be time to revisit those lessons.

Have an Emergency Fund

You may call it a rainy-day fund. If so, the skies are getting cloudy. If you haven’t already put money aside in a secured FDIC account for emergencies, it may be time to start. In the event of a lost job or your forced to take a pay cut, you want the flexibility to cover expenses while you engage in a plan of action. This fund is designed for necessary expenses. Be diligent with how you use the money. Again, you don’t know how long a potential recession could last.

Obtain Additional Income

A smart tactic — and one that’s been popularized in recent years — is finding other streams of revenue outside of your job. We live in a gig economy and the skills you’ve honed at your current employer may prove valuable in a consulting capacity. You could replace any lost income from a job loss or salary reduction by uncovering potential freelancing opportunities in your specialty. It doesn’t hurt to add more skills to your resume. The more you know how to do, the more attractive you become to your current or future employer.

Anticipate the Worst

No one expects to lose their job, but don’t be unprepared if it happens. It would be appropriate for you to consider your options in the event of the unthinkable. Update your resume. Update your LinkedIn profile. All those professional relationships you developed, both online and in-person, could become leads to new positions. Prepare for the worst, expect the best.

(Courtesy: https://barnumfinancialgroup.com/repel-the-recession-with-these-5-tips/)

Thousands Of Yellow Cab Owner-Drivers To See Debt Relief They Won After 45-Day Camp Out And 15-Day Hunger Strike

(New York, NY) Thousands of yellow cab medallion owner-drivers will finally begin to see the debt relief they won after NYTWA members held a 45-day camp out and 15-day hunger strike last November, as City Hall announced today that the program to provide a city-backed guarantee on restructured loans will be operational starting September 19th.

Under the program, loans that are reduced by medallion lenders to no more than $200,000 will receive a $30,000 grant and the remaining balance will be guaranteed by the city in case of default.

The average debt is currently $550,000 with average monthly payments at $3,000. Under the final program, the new loan term for thousands will be $170,000 payable at $1,234 per month.

The final program reflects an increase in interest agreed upon in November 2021 from 5% to 7.3% as rates have gone up due to inflation; and a longer term of 25 years from 20 years to help drivers offset some of that cost.

The loan will be secured by a city-backed guarantee, relieving thousands of drivers from the fear of losing their homes or thousands of dollars in case of default.

Marblegate Assets, the largest holder of loans, is ready to begin restructurings on September 19th – bringing immediate relief to the largest segment of owner-driver borrowers.

The City’s program is for all lenders and all eligible medallion owners (medallion owners who do not own more than 5 medallions.) Other lenders representing hundreds more loans are expected to also participate.

NYTWA Executive Director Bhairavi Desai said: “We are finally at the starting line of a new life for thousands of drivers and our families. The city-backed guarantee is a ground-breaking program that will save and change lives. We are thankful to City Hall, the TLC, the Mayor’s Office of Management and Budget, the Law Department, and to Marblegate for burning the midnight oil to set up this historic program to address the crisis of debt across the industry. As we collectively work to end this crisis and hit re-start, we look forward to working with all lenders. I congratulate all of our union members who chose to organize, and not despair, and won back their lives. Against the darkness of a crushing debt, their courage remained the light, and today, the triumph is fully theirs.”

BACKGROUND:

Since City Hall agreed to a city-backed guarantee in November 2021, the Adams administration’s TLC, Office of Management and Budget and Law Department have been working to make the program operational. The City negotiated program terms and documents with Marblegate Assets, the largest medallion loan holder, and NYTWA.

NYTWA members voted unanimously to give their sign-off at the end of negotiations.

The new terms for drivers means:

  • No personal guarantee in case of default
  • No Confession of Judgment; COJ are pre-signed documents by the borrower accepting responsibility in case of default and waving their right to a hearing. Lenders would be empowered to skip the court process including a trial to receive a judgment that could then be collected on immediately; including going after people’s homes as the COJ would be combined with a personal guarantee.
  • No balloon payments; Balloon payments meant that the lender could demand the full balance on a loan at the end of a balloon which would typically be every 3 or 5 years. Owner-drivers would be forced to agree to any new terms, including high interest rates, the lender would demand at the end of the balloon.
  • No pre-payment penalty in case a borrower wants to pay off the loan earlier

 

Click here to see our statement on November 3, 2021 when the agreement was first reached

India Ranks Seventh In Digital Currency Ownership Worldwide: UN

The United Nations announced that the Covid-19 pandemic has caused an unprecedented rise in According to a report by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), around 7.3 percent of Indians owned some form of digital currency in 2021. This highlights that over the last couple of years, digital assets have surged to popularity among the Indian populace amounting to over 100 million crypto holders.

Cryptocurrency use worldwide has risen, with India moving up to the seventh-highest position in terms of ownership. The UN noted that 7.3 percent of Indians possessed assets in the form of digital currency as of 2021. According to data from 2021, developing nations made up 15 of the top 20 economies in terms of the percentage of the total population that owns cryptocurrency. The statistics for other nations were also provided by UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development).

The report also states that 15 of the top 20 nations in terms of digital currency ownership were developing countries, with India ranking 7th, one position behind the US. Pakistan also made it to the list coming in 15th while the UK and Australia occupied the 13th and 20th positions respectively. Topping the list was Ukraine, with 12.7 percent of its population holding crypto assets.

As per the UNCTAD report, the crypto ecosystem ballooned by over 2,300 percent between September 2019 and June 2021. However, Indian investors have grown sceptical of these digital assets, with regulatory bodies coming down hard on cryptocurrencies.

While buying and selling crypto assets is not illegal, profits from the same are being treated as winnings from gambling, and the income from the transfer of virtual assets is being taxed at 30 percent. On top of this, there is also one percent TDS deduction on all transactions.

Earlier this year, crypto exchanges in the country were also forced to halt UPI payments due to uncertainty from regulatory bodies. This made it harder to acquire digital assets. Such uncertainties are also driving crypto firms to set up bases elsewhere, with several projects looking to countries like Dubai as a hub for digital asset operations.

US House Panel Advances Prior Authorization Relief Bill For Seniors

Newswise — The House Ways and Means Committee has voted unanimously to advance the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2022 (H.R. 8487), positioning the bill for passage in Congress possibly this fall. The bill would reform prior authorization under the Medicare Advantage program to help ensure America’s seniors get the care they need when they need it.

Support for this commonsense legislation is overwhelming. The bill has more than 330 cosponsors in the House and Senate, and has been endorsed by more 500 organizations, including the American Academy of Ophthalmology, and more 30 additional ophthalmic subspecialty and state societies.

recent report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General underscored the need for reform, finding that Medicare Advantage plans have denied prior authorization requests that met Medicare coverage rules.

The bill was introduced by Reps. Suzan DelBene (D-WA), Mike Kelly (R-PA), Ami Bera, MD, (D-CA), and Larry Bucshon, MD, (R-IN). If enacted, the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act would streamline and standardize prior authorization in the Medicare Advantage (MA) program, providing much-needed oversight and transparency while protecting beneficiaries from unnecessary care delays and denials. The legislation would improve prior authorization in MA plans by:

Establishing an electronic prior authorization (ePA) program;

Standardizing and streamlining the prior authorization process for routinely approved services, including establishing a list of services eligible for real-time prior authorization decisions;

Ensuring prior authorization requests are reviewed by qualified medical personnel; and

Increasing transparency around MA prior authorization requirements and their use.

This bill has been years in the making. The Academy is a founding member of the Regulatory Relief Coalition, a group of sixteen national physician specialty and two allied organizations advocating for a reduction in Medicare program regulatory burdens to protect patients’ timely access to care and allow physicians to spend more time with their patients. We thank the bill’s sponsors, as well as the chair and ranking member of House Ways and Means Committee, Reps. Richie Neal (D-MA) and Kevin Brady (R-TX).

“We believe this bill will help remove some of the unnecessary red tape that overburdens our healthcare system and prevents us from providing the care America’s seniors need when they need it,” said David Glasser, MD, the Academy’s secretary for Federal Affairs. “We’re confident that when this bill comes to the House floor, Congress will agree with these commonsense reforms.”

When Will The Indian Rupee Stop Falling?

The Indian Rupee breached the psychological 80-mark for the first time against the US dollar on Tuesday, July 18th, declining to 80.06 per Dollar. The Reserve Bank of India intervened in the currency market to help the Rupee steady after hitting seven straight intraday record lows. A recovery in domestic shares also favored the Indian currency.

According analysts, a wobbly global macroeconomic environment marked by a spell of monetary tightening unleashed, firstly, by the Federal Reserve and being mimicked in earnest by the major central bank governors across the globe has led to an exodus of hot money from developing economies to the “safe haven” of the Dollar. The scenario is compounded further by record-breaking crude oil prices, which balloon India’s imports, diminish the cumulative value of India’s exports and widen our trade deficit.

It is a regular demand-supply market. Currently, there is a greater demand for Dollars than there is for the Rupee. Two factors have pushed demand — India’s current account deficit has sharply widened particularly after Russia invaded Ukraine, and investment in the Indian economy has fallen due to heavy flight of funds in recent months.

Depreciation of the Rupee makes imported items — including petrol and mobile phones — and gives India’s export a competitive edge. But India is a net importer. For those eyeing a trip abroad, earlier budgets on food, boarding, and transportation will now fall short – leaving one with the option to either expand their budgets or opt for countries where the rupee commands a stronger position compared to their domestic currencies.

The dollar has been appreciating against all currencies including the Euro. Market watchers, in fact, say that the Rupee has fared better compared to other currencies including the Euro.

In FY’22, as per the provisional figures released by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), India’s current account deficit widened to $38.7 billion from a surplus of $23.9 billion in the previous FY. 

A widening current account deficit indicates that Indians have been converting more of their rupees into dollars to complete trade and investment transactions consequently spiking up the demand for dollars. It doesn’t help that foreign institutional investors (FIIs) have been dumping Indian equities after a strong bullish spell, and making a beeline for US treasury notes and bonds.

The RBI has intervened by selling Dollars to check the Rupee’s slide. Else, the free market would have seen a further weaker Rupee. The current exchange market scenarios suggest that the rupee’s fall may continue for a few more months, breaching even the 82-mark. Congress leader Shashi Tharoor took a dig at the Rupee’s slide saying a “strong government” is “giving us a weaker Rupee”.

US Dollar Gains Are Boon To Americans Traveling Abroad

The surging value of the U.S. dollar in recent weeks is a boon to the American traveler, who will get more bang for their buck overseas despite surging inflation at home.  

But a strong American currency could limit international visitors to the U.S., where tourism firms are still licking their wounds from the height of the pandemic.  

The dollar recently hit parity with the euro for the first time in two decades, making trips to Europe 10 to 15 percent less expensive for Americans than at the same time last year.  

The dollar is also soaring in destinations like Thailand, India and South Korea — countries with ample tourism interest from Americans and relatively weaker economic growth than the U.S. 

“With the rising cost of travel, the strong U.S. dollar is a net positive amidst all the disruption in the industry,” said Erika Richter, vice president of communications at the American Society of Travel Advisors.  Richter noted that Americans are spending 11 percent more on travel compared to 2019. 

The idea of a strong dollar might seem like a farce to Americans after annual inflation hit 9.1 percent in June and the price of gas and food rose far faster. But the dollar has still become more valuable abroad even as it yields less in goods and services at home. 

Demand for the U.S. dollar in other countries has skyrocketed amid concerns about a global recession caused by high inflation, the war in Ukraine and lingering COVID-19 supply shocks.  

While the U.S. is not immune from those threats, the economy has held up far stronger than other nations, making its currency more valuable abroad. The dollar is also used as the world’s reserve currency, meaning foreign individuals and companies will often boost their holdings and conduct transactions in dollars to protect themselves from financial shocks. 

The strength of the U.S. economy has allowed the Federal Reserve to boost interest rates at a much faster pace. That makes the U.S. dollar more expensive to acquire — and more valuable in other countries. 

“A stronger dollar benefits American households directly if they want to travel to Europe, as the relative cost of everything is cheaper. It also makes imports cheaper for American households and businesses,” explained Angel Talavera, head of European economics at Oxford Economics. 

Half of American travelers say high prices kept them from traveling in June, up 8 percentage points from the previous month, according to a recent survey from Destination Analysts. 

But favorable exchange rates blunt the impact of inflation, which has risen at similar rates to the U.S. in Europe. Expedia data found that searches for summer trips to popular European destinations such as Paris, Frankfurt, Brussels, Amsterdam and Dublin rose by double digits last week. Copenhagen, Athens and Madrid saw similar increases in lodging interest, according to Hotels.com. 

“The U.S. has never really developed its tourism infrastructure the way Europe has, so a lot of our inventory sold out months ago,” said Leslie Overton, an advisor at travel firm Fora. “While I’m not saying either is cheap, Europe might be considered more competitive than some of the higher end product here in the U.S. right now.” 

One dollar buys roughly 15 percent more than it did one year ago in the 19 European countries that use the euro. The dollar is trading at its highest ever level against India’s rupee and Thailand’s baht. The Mexican peso and Canadian dollar have remained mostly flat.  

But currency fluctuations won’t help much with soaring airfares. While domestic airfare is 13 percent higher than pre-pandemic levels, international flights are 22 percent pricier, according to data from travel firm Hopper. 

Those traveling to parts of Europe face a heightened risk of delays or cancellations.  London’s Heathrow Airport on Wednesday asked airlines to stop selling summer tickets after staffing shortages forced the airport to delay roughly half of its flights this month. The Netherlands’ largest airport is similarly making large cuts to its flight schedules, driving up prices.  

Conversely, the strength of the dollar will make trips to the U.S. far more expensive for many international travelers, potentially weakening the U.S. tourism industry as it aims to claw back some of the millions of jobs lost during the pandemic.  

A stronger U.S. dollar also boosts pressure on global economies to raise their own interest rates to keep up, a force that raises the risk of a severe global recession that could bounce back to the U.S. in dangerous ways. 

The U.S. welcomed 22.1 million inbound travelers in 2021 — down 79 percent from 2019 — amid COVID-19 travel restrictions that lasted throughout most of the year, according to the International Trade Administration. The agency found that the lack of tourism in the U.S. in the first year of the pandemic accounted for 56 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product decline.

Wishing To Be Off Billionaires List, Bill Gates Donates $20 Billion To Foundation

That’s Bill Gates’ estimated net worth, making him the world’s fourth-richest person — but he doesn’t intend to rank that high forever. On Wednesday, the Microsoft co-founder said he wants to “move down and eventually off of the list of the world’s richest people” because he feels “obligated to return his resources to society.” 

On the same day, Gates moved $20 billion of his wealth into the endowment of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, one of the largest philanthropies in the world. The foundation plans to increase its payouts from nearly $6 billion to $9 billion each year by 2026. 

Bill Gates is moving $20 billion of his wealth into the endowment of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which is ramping up its spending in the face of global challenges, including the pandemic and the war in Ukraine, media reports said. 

The foundation, one of the world’s largest philanthropies, plans to increase its payouts by 50 per cent over pre-pandemic levels, from nearly $6 billion to $9 billion each year by 2026. The foundation is primarily focused on charitable giving that’s aimed at improving global health, gender equality and education, among other issues, CNN reported.

The Microsoft co-founder and his ex-wife, Melinda French Gates, have both pledged to donate the vast majority of their wealth to the foundation they established together 20 years ago, as well as to other philanthropic endeavours.

The couple announced their divorce in May 2021, saying they would work together as co-chairs under a two-year trial period. At the end of that trial, French Gates has the option to resign and receive a payout from her former husband, who would remain in charge of the foundation.

With an estimated net worth of around $ 114 billion, Bill Gates is currently the world’s fourth-richest person, according to Bloomberg’s Billionaire Index, with most of his wealth tied to Microsoft shares.

But he doesn’t intend to rank that high forever. “I will move down and eventually off of the list of the world’s richest people,” Gates wrote in a blog.

“I have an obligation to return my resources to society in ways that have the greatest impact for improving lives. I hope others in positions of great wealth and privilege will step up in this moment too,” he said, CNN reported. (IANS)

Top Billionaires Lose $1.4 Trillion In Worst Half Of Year 2022

With policy makers now raising interest rates to combat elevated inflation, some of the highest-flying shares — and the billionaires who own them — are losing their combined wealth due to economic factors that has impacted global economies around the world. 

Elon Musk’s fortune plunged almost $62 billion. Jeff Bezos saw his wealth tumble by about $63 billion. Mark Zuckerberg’s net worth was slashed by more than half.

All told, the world’s 500 richest people lost $1.4 trillion in the first half of 2022, a dizzying decline that marks the steepest six-month drop ever for the global billionaire class.

It’s a sharp departure from the previous two years, when the fortunes of the ultra-rich swelled as governments and central banks unleashed unprecedented stimulus measures in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, juicing the value of everything from tech companies to cryptocurrencies.

With policy makers now raising interest rates to combat elevated inflation, some of the highest-flying shares — and the billionaires who own them — are losing altitude fast. Tesla Inc. had its worst quarter ever in the three months through June, while Amazon.com Inc. plummeted by the most since the dot-com bubble burst.

Though the losses are piling up for the world’s richest people, it only represents a modest move toward narrowing wealth inequality. Musk, Tesla’s co-founder, still has the biggest fortune on the planet, at $208.5 billion, while Amazon’s Bezos is second with a $129.6 billion net worth, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

Bernard Arnault, France’s richest person, ranks third with a $128.7 billion fortune, followed by Bill Gates with $114.8 billion, according to the Bloomberg index. They’re the only four that are worth more than $100 billion — at the start of the year, 10 people worldwide exceeded that amount, including Zuckerberg, who is now 17th on the wealth list with $60 billion.

Changpeng Zhao, the crypto pioneer who debuted on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index in January with an estimated fortune of $96 billion, has seen his wealth tumble by almost $80 billion this year amid the turmoil in digital assets.

Still, the billionaire class has amassed so much wealth in recent years that not only can the vast majority withstand the worst first half since 1970 for the S&P 500 Index, but they’re likely looking for bargains, said Thorne Perkin, president of Papamarkou Wellner Asset Management.

“Often their mindset is a bit more contrarian,” Perkin said. “A lot of our clients look for opportunities when there’s trouble in the streets.” That held true in the first half of the year in some of the most distressed corners of the global financial markets.

Vladimir Potanin, Russia’s wealthiest man with a $35.2 billion fortune, acquired Societe Generale SA’s entire position in Rosbank PJSC earlier this year amid the fallout from Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. He also bought out sanctioned Russian mogul Oleg Tinkov’s stake in a digital bank for a fraction of what it was once worth.

Sam Bankman-Fried, chief executive officer of crypto exchange FTX, bought a 7.6% stake in Robinhood Markets Inc. in early May after the app-based brokerage’s share price tumbled 77% from its hotly anticipated initial public offering last July. The 30-year-old billionaire has also been acting as a lender of last resort for some troubled crypto companies.

The most high-profile buyout of all belonged to Musk, who reached a $44 billion deal to buy Twitter Inc. He offered to pay $54.20 a share; the social-media company’s stock traded at $37.44 at 10:25 a.m. in New York. The world’s richest man said in an interview with Bloomberg News Editor-in-Chief John Micklethwait last month that there are “a few unresolved matters” before the transaction can be completed. “There’s a limit to what I can say publicly,” he said. “It is somewhat of a sensitive matter.”

How Much Health Insurers Pay For Almost Everything Is About To Go Public

Consumers, employers and just about everyone else interested in health care prices will soon get an unprecedented look at what insurers pay for care, perhaps helping answer a question that has long dogged those who buy insurance: Are we getting the best deal we can?

Starting July 1, health insurers and self-insured employers must post on websites just about every price they’ve negotiated with providers for health care services, item by item. About the only exclusion is the prices paid for prescription drugs, except those administered in hospitals or doctors’ offices.

The federally required data release could affect future prices or even how employers contract for health care. Many will see for the first time how well their insurers are doing compared with others.

The new rules are far broader than those that went into effect last year requiring hospitals to post their negotiated rates for the public to see. Now insurers must post the amounts paid for “every physician in network, every hospital, every surgery center, every nursing facility,” said Jeffrey Leibach, a partner at the consulting firm Guidehouse.

“When you start doing the math, you’re talking trillions of records,” he said. The fines the federal government could impose for noncompliance are also heftier than the penalties that hospitals face.

Federal officials learned from the hospital experience and gave insurers more direction on what was expected, said Leibach. Insurers or self-insured employers could be fined as much as $100 a day for each violation and each affected enrollee if they fail to provide the data. “Get your calculator out: All of a sudden you are in the millions pretty fast,” Leibach said.

Determined consumers, especially those with high-deductible health plans, may try to dig in right away and use the data to try comparing what they will have to pay at different hospitals, clinics, or doctor offices for specific services.

But each database’s enormous size may mean that most people “will find it very hard to use the data in a nuanced way,” said Katherine Baicker, dean of the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy.

At least at first, Entrepreneurs are expected to quickly translate the information into more user-friendly formats so it can be incorporated into new or existing services that estimate costs for patients. And starting Jan. 1, the rules require insurers to provide online tools that will help people get upfront cost estimates for about 500 so-called “shoppable” services, meaning medical care they can schedule ahead of time.

Once those things happen, “you’ll at least have the options in front of you,” said Chris Severn, CEO of Turquoise Health, an online company that has posted price information made available under the rules for hospitals, although many hospitals have yet to comply.

With the addition of the insurers’ data, sites like his will be able to drill down further into cost variation from one place to another or among insurers.

“If you’re going to get an X-ray, you will be able to see that you can do it for $250 at this hospital, $75 at the imaging center down the road, or your specialist can do it in office for $25,” he said.

Everyone will know everyone else’s business: for example, how much insurers Aetna and Humana pay the same surgery center for a knee replacement. The requirements stem from the Affordable Care Act and a 2019 executive order by then-President Donald Trump.

“These plans are supposed to be acting on behalf of employers in negotiating good rates, and the little insight we have on that shows it has not happened,” said Elizabeth Mitchell, president and CEO of the Purchaser Business Group on Health, an affiliation of employers who offer job-based health benefits to workers. “I do believe the dynamics are going to change.”

Other observers are more circumspect.

“Maybe at best this will reduce the wide variance of prices out there,” said Zack Cooper, director of health policy at the Yale University Institution for Social and Policy Studies. “But it won’t be unleashing a consumer revolution.”

Still, the biggest value of the July data release may well be to shed light on how successful insurers have been at negotiating prices. It comes on the heels of research that has shown tremendous variation in what is paid for health care. A recent study by the Rand Corp., for example, shows that employers that offer job-based insurance plans paid, on average, 224% more than Medicare for the same services.

Tens of thousands of employers who buy insurance coverage for their workers will get this more-complete pricing picture — and may not like what they see.

“What we’re learning from the hospital data is that insurers are really bad at negotiating,” said Gerard Anderson, a professor in the department of health policy at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, citing research that found that negotiated rates for hospital care can be higher than what the facilities accept from patients who are not using insurance and are paying cash.

That could add to the frustration that Mitchell and others say employers have with the current health insurance system. More might try to contract with providers directly, only using insurance companies for claims processing. Other employers may bring their insurers back to the bargaining table.

“For the first time, an employer will be able to go to an insurance company and say, ‘You have not negotiated a good-enough deal, and we know that because we can see the same provider has negotiated a better deal with another company,'” said James Gelfand, president of the ERISA Industry Committee, a trade group of self-insured employers.

If that happens, he added, “patients will be able to save money.” That’s not necessarily a given, however.

Because this kind of public release of pricing data hasn’t been tried widely in health care before, how it will affect future spending remains uncertain. If insurers are pushed back to the bargaining table or providers see where they stand relative to their peers, prices could drop. However, some providers could raise their prices if they see they are charging less than their peers.

“Downward pressure may not be a given,” said Kelley Schultz, vice president of commercial policy for AHIP, the industry’s trade lobby.

Baicker, of the University of Chicago, said that even after the data is out, rates will continue to be heavily influenced by local conditions, such as the size of an insurer or employer — providers often give bigger discounts, for example, to the insurers or self-insured employers that can send them the most patients. The number of hospitals in a region also matters — if an area has only one, for instance, that usually means the facility can demand higher rates.

Another unknown: Will insurers meet the deadline and provide usable data?

Schultz, at AHIP, said the industry is well on the way, partly because the original deadline was extended by six months. She expects insurers to do better than the hospital industry. “We saw a lot of hospitals that just decided not to post files or make them difficult to find,” she said.

So far, more than 300 noncompliant hospitals have received warning letters from the government. But they could face $300-a-day fines for failing to comply, which is less than what insurers potentially face, although the federal government has recently upped the ante to up to $5,500 a day for the largest facilities.

Even after the pricing data is public, “I don’t think things will change overnight,” said Leibach. “Patients are still going to make care decisions based on their doctors and referrals, a lot of reasons other than price.”

(This story was produced by The Hill in partnership with Kaiser Health News. KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. It is an editorially independent operating program of Kaiser Family Foundation).

Dow Tumbles 876 Points And Stocks Enter Bear Market On Worries Of Drastic Rate Hikes

US stocks have plunged into a bear market as Wall Street investors grew increasingly nervous about the prospect of even harsher medicine from the Fed to take the sting out of inflation.

The Dow (INDU) sank 876 points or 2.8%. The Nasdaq was down by 4.7% and has tumbled more than 10% in the past two trading sessions.

The broader S&P 500 fell 3.9%. That index is now more than 20% below its all-time high set in January, putting stocks in a bear-market.

Recession fears mounted after Friday’s miserable Consumer Price Index report showed US inflation was significantly higher than economists had expected last month. That could make the Federal Reserve’s inflation-control efforts more difficult.

After raising rates by a half point in May — an action the Fed hadn’t taken since 2000 — Chair Jerome Powell pledged more of the same until the central bank was satisfied that inflation was under control. At that point, the Fed would resume standard quarter-point hikes, he said.

But after May’s hotter-than-expected inflation report, Wall Street is increasingly calling for tougher action from the Fed to keep prices under control. Jefferies joined Barclays on Monday in predicting that the Federal Reserve would hike rates by three-quarters of a percentage point, an action the Fed hasn’t taken since 1994.

“After holding their breath for nearly a week awaiting the US CPI report for May, investors exhaled in exasperation as inflation came in hotter than expected,” Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA, said in a note to clients Monday morning.

Stovall said the risk of larger hikes dragged the markets lower Monday.

Investors fear two outcomes, neither of them good: Higher rates mean bigger borrowing costs for businesses, which can eat into their bottom lines. And overly zealous action from the Fed could unintentionally plunge the US economy into a recession, especially if businesses start laying off workers and the red-hot housing market crumbles.

There’s no sign that the job and housing markets are in danger of collapse, although both are cooling off somewhat.

In an interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria Sunday, former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke said a US recession remains possible. But Bernanke said he had faith that Powell and the Fed could achieve a so-called soft landing, the elusive outcome in which the central bank can cool the economy down to get inflation under control without slowing it down so much that it enters a recession.

“Economists are very bad at predicting recessions, but I think the Fed has a decent chance — a reasonable chance — of achieving what Powell calls a soft-ish landing, either no recession or a very mild recession to bring inflation down,” Bernanke said.

Analysts appeared to move beyond a “buy the dip” mentality on Monday, signaling that they don’t see markets recovering quickly.

“Valuations aren’t much cheaper given rising interest rates and a weaker earnings outlook, in our view,” wrote strategists at BlackRock in a Monday notes. “A higher path of policy rates justifies lower equity prices. Plus, margin pressures are a risk to earnings.”

BlackRock will remain neutral on stocks for the next six- to 12-months, the strategists said.

Bears and bulls

The S&P 500 closed in a bear market, so the bull run that started on March 23, 2020 has come to an end. But, because of the tricky way these things are measured, the bear market technically began on January 3, when the S&P 500 hit its all-time high.

That means the latest bull market lasted just over 21 months — the shortest on record, according to Howard Silverblatt, S&P Dow Jones Indices senior index analyst. Over the past century, bull markets have lasted an average of about 60 months.

The shortest bull market followed the shortest bear market, one that lasted just over a month — from February 19 to March 23, 2020. Bear markets historically last an average of 19 months, according to Silverblatt.

Stocks briefly fell into a bear market on May 20, although a late-day rally rescued the market from closing below that threshold for the first time since the early days of the pandemic.

The tech-heavy Nasdaq has been in a bear market for some time and is now more than 32% below its all-time high set in November 2021. The Dow is still some way from a bear market. It has fallen about 16% from the all-time high it reached on the last day of 2021.

Warren Buffet Warns Of A 50% Fall In Stock Market Buffet Told Investors That They Should Be Prepared For A 50 Per Cent Fall In The Shares

Veteran investor Warren Buffett has tremendous experience in the stock market that makes everyone trust his forecasts. Not only this, he has earned a lot of wealth from the stock market. Now amidst the ongoing volatility in the stock market, he has asked to be prepared for a fall of up to 50 per cent in the shares.

Warren Buffett has shared a video on Instagram. In this video he is giving advice to the investors investing in the stock market. He told investors that they should be prepared for a 50 per cent fall in the shares. This video has been shared on Instagram with the handle Warret Buffet Videos.

He said that when Berkshire’s stock fell, there was nothing wrong with the company. He said that the mind of the investor should be right. Otherwise, your life will be spent in buying and selling shares at the wrong time and you will continue to cry for loss. Investors take decisions on the advice of others when prices fluctuate.

They say that if you cannot keep investing in a stock for a long time, then you should not buy it. He says that just as you keep the farm with you for a long period, in the same way you need to be financially and psychologically prepared to hold the shares. Buffett had also said during an interview that you should invest in only those companies, which he understands. They should expect that the company’s shares will give good returns in the long run.

Warren Buffett takes the help of three rules to buy shares. He says that the first rule is that the company should have a good income on the amount invested in the business. Second, the management of the company should be in the hands of honest and skilled managers. Third the company’s share price should be correct.

A New Billionaire Has Been Minted Almost Daily During The Pandemic

The Covid-19 pandemic has been good for the wallets of the wealthy. Some 573 people have joined the billionaire ranks since 2020, bringing the worldwide total to 2,668, according to an analysis released by Oxfam on Sunday. That means a new billionaire was minted about every 30 hours, on average, so far during the pandemic.

The report, which draws on data compiled by Forbes, looks at the rise of inequality over the past two years. It is timed to coincide with the kickoff of the annual World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland, a gathering of some of the wealthiest people and world leaders.

Billionaires have seen their total net worth soar by $3.8 trillion, or 42%, to $12.7 trillion during the pandemic. A large part of the increase has been fueled by strong gains in the stock markets, which was aided by governments injecting money into the global economy to soften the financial blow of the coronavirus.

Much of the jump in wealth came in the first year of the pandemic. It then plateaued and has since dropped a bit, said Max Lawson, head of inequality policy at Oxfam.

At the same time, Covid-19, growing inequality and rising food prices could push as many as 263 million people into extreme poverty this year, reversing decades of progress, Oxfam said in a report released last month. “I’ve never seen such a dramatic growth in poverty and growth in wealth at the same moment in history,” Lawson said. “It’s going to hurt a lot of people.”

Benefiting from high prices

Consumers around the world are contending with the soaring cost of energy and food, but corporations in these industries and their leaders are benefiting from the rise in prices, Oxfam said.

Billionaires in the food and agribusiness sector have seen their total wealth increase by $382 billion, or 45%, over the past two years, after adjusting for inflation. Some 62 food billionaires were created since 2020.

Meanwhile, the net worth of their peers in the oil, gas and coal sectors jumped by $53 billion, or 24%, since 2020, after adjusting for inflation.

Davos is back and the world has changed. Have the global elite noticed?

Forty new pandemic billionaires were created in the pharmaceutical industry, which has been at the forefront of the battle against Covid-19 and the beneficiary of billions in public funding.

The tech sector has spawned many billionaires, including seven of the 10 world’s richest people, such as Telsa’s Elon Musk, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos and Microsoft’s Bill Gates. These men increased their wealth by $436 billion to $934 billion over the past two years, after adjusting for inflation.

Tax the rich

To counter the meteoric growth in inequality and help those struggling with the rise in prices, Oxfam is pushing governments to tax the wealthy and corporations.

It is calling for a temporary 90% tax on excess corporate profits, as well as a one-time tax on billionaires’ wealth.

The group would also like to levy a permanent wealth tax on the super-rich. It suggests a 2% tax on assets greater than $5 million, rising to 5% for net worth above $1 billion. This could raise $2.5 trillion worldwide.

Wealth taxes, however, have not been embraced by many governments. Efforts to levy taxes on the net worth of the richest Americans have failed to advance in Congress in recent years.

Rise of the Super Rich & Fall of the World’s Poor

Michael Bloomberg, the three-term Mayor of New York city and a billionaire philanthropist, was once quoted as saying that by the time he dies, he would have given away all his wealth to charity – so that his cheque to the funeral undertaker will bounce for lack of funds in his bank account.

Sounds altruistic – even as the number of billionaires keep rising while the poorest of the world’s poor keep multiplying.

The latest brief by Oxfam International, titled “Profiting from Pain” and released May 23, shows that 573 people became new billionaires during the two-and-a half-year Covid 19 pandemic —while the world’s poverty stricken continued to increase.

“We expect this year that 263 million more people will crash into extreme poverty, at a rate of a million people every 33 hours,” Oxfam said.

Billionaires’ wealth has risen more in the first 24 months of COVID-19 than in 23 years combined. The total wealth of the world’s billionaires is now equivalent to 13.9 percent of global GDP. This is a three-fold increase (up from 4.4 percent) in 2000, according to the study.

Asked about the philanthropic gestures, Gabriela Bucher, Executive Director of Oxfam International, told IPS wealthy individuals who use their money to help others should be congratulated.

“But charitable giving is no substitute for wealthy people and companies paying their fair share of tax or ensuring their workers are paid a decent wage. And it does not justify them using their power and connections to lobby for unfair advantages over others,” she declared.

Oxfam’s new research also reveals that corporations in the energy, food and pharmaceutical sectors —where monopolies are especially common— are posting record-high profits, even as wages have barely budged and workers struggle with decades-high prices amid COVID-19.

The fortunes of food and energy billionaires have risen by $453 billion in the last two years, equivalent to $1 billion every two days, says Oxfam.

Five of the largest energy companies (BP, Shell, Total Energies, Exxon and Chevron) are together making $2,600 profit every second, and there are now 62 new food billionaires.

Currently, the world’s total population is around 7.8 billion, and according to the UN, more than 736 million people live below the international poverty line.

A World Bank report last year said extreme poverty is set to rise, for the first time in more than two decades, and the impact of the spreading virus is expected to push up to 115 million more people into poverty, while the pandemic is compounding the forces of conflict and climate change, that has already been slowing poverty reduction.

By 2021, as many as 150 million more people could be living in extreme poverty.

Yasmeen Hassan, Global Executive Director at Equality Now, told IPS Oxfam’s report demonstrates systemic failings in the discriminatory nature of countries’ economies and underscores the urgent need for financial systems to be restructured so that they benefit the 99%, not the 1%.

“As with any crisis, Equality Now foresaw that gender would influence how individuals and communities experienced the pandemic, but even we were shocked at how exceptionally and intensely pre-existing inequalities and sex-based discrimination has been exacerbated”, she said.

While billionaires — the vast majority of whom are men — continue to amass vast sums of wealth, women around the world remain trapped in poverty. Wealthy elites are profiting off women’s labor, much of which is underappreciated, underpaid, and uncompensated, she pointed out.

“Economic hardship and inadequate policy responses to the pandemic have eroded many of the hard-won gains that have been achieved over recent years for women and girls. From increases in child marriage, sexual exploitation and human trafficking, to landlords demanding sex from female tenants who have lost their job, and domestic workers trapped inside with abusive employers, women and girls around the world have borne the brunt of the pandemic,” Hassan declared.

The Oxfam study has been released to coincide with the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) annual meeting—which includes the presence of the rich and the superrich—taking place in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland from 22-26 May. The meeting, whose theme is ‘Working Together, Restoring Trust’, will be the first global in-person leadership event since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020

“Billionaires are arriving in Davos to celebrate an incredible surge in their fortunes. The pandemic, and now the steep increases in food and energy prices have, simply put, been a bonanza for them. Meanwhile, decades of progress on extreme poverty are now in reverse and millions of people are facing impossible rises in the cost of simply staying alive,” said Oxfam’s Bucher.

She said billionaires’ fortunes have not increased because they are now smarter or working harder. But it is really the workers who are working harder, for less pay and in worse conditions.

The super-rich, she argued, have rigged the system with impunity for decades and they are now reaping the benefits. They have seized a shocking amount of the world’s wealth as a result of privatization and monopolies, gutting regulation and workers’ rights while stashing their cash in tax havens — all with the complicity of governments.”

“Meanwhile, millions of others are skipping meals, turning off the heating, falling behind on bills and wondering what they can possibly do next to survive. Across East Africa, one person is likely dying every minute from hunger. This grotesque inequality is breaking the bonds that hold us together as humanity. It is divisive, corrosive and dangerous. This is inequality that literally kills.”

Elaborating further, Hassan of Equality Now said women are more likely to be informally employed, low-wage earners, and this disadvantaged position has resulted in higher rates of women losing their jobs, particularly in sectors that were not prioritized in government relief packages.

“Women are also more likely to be primary caretaker and many have had to absorb increases in unpaid duties while schools and nurseries shut down. As a consequence, some women have been forced out of jobs as they found it impossible to juggle full-time work while also providing full-time childcare. This loss of income has been especially catastrophic for women in poverty and has made them more vulnerable to a range of human rights violations.”

She said world leaders must stop pursuing policy agendas that benefit the rich and hurt the poor.

“Instead, we urgently need a committed and coordinated response from governments and policymakers to reduce inequality and poverty, and address discrimination that is holding women and girls back while allowing the super-rich to get richer still,” she added.

The Oxfam study also says the pandemic has created 40 new pharma billionaires.

Pharmaceutical corporations like Moderna and Pfizer are making $1,000 profit every second just from their monopoly control of the COVID-19 vaccine, despite its development having been supported by billions of dollars in public investments.

“They are charging governments up to 24 times more than the potential cost of generic production. 87 percent of people in low-income countries have still not been fully vaccinated.”

“The extremely rich and powerful are profiting from pain and suffering. This is unconscionable. Some have grown rich by denying billions of people access to vaccines, others by exploiting rising food and energy prices. They are paying out massive bonuses and dividends while paying as little tax as possible. This rising wealth and rising poverty are two sides of the same coin, proof that our economic system is functioning exactly how the rich and powerful designed it to do,” said Bucher.

Oxfam recommends that governments urgently:

–·Introduce one-off solidarity taxes on billionaires’ pandemic windfalls to fund support for people facing rising food and energy costs and a fair and sustainable recovery from COVID-19. Argentina adopted a one-off special levy dubbed the ‘millionaire’s tax’ and is now considering introducing a windfall tax on energy profits as well as a tax on undeclared assets held overseas to repay IMF debt. The super-rich have stashed nearly $8 trillion in tax havens.

  • — End crisis profiteering by introducing a temporary excess profit tax of 90 percent to capture the windfall profits of big corporations across all industries. Oxfam estimated that such a tax on just 32 super-profitable multinational companies could have generated $104 billion in revenue in 2020.

— Introduce permanent wealth taxes to rein in extreme wealth and monopoly power, as well as the outsized carbon emissions of the super-rich. An annual wealth tax on millionaires starting at just 2 percent, and 5 percent on billionaires, could generate $2.52 trillion a year —enough to lift 2.3 billion people out of poverty, make enough vaccines for the world, and deliver universal healthcare and social protection for everyone living in low- and lower middle-income countries.

Indian Rupee Falls To The Lowest

The Indian rupee extended its losses and touched an all-time low of 77.42 against the US dollar in early trade on Monday, May 10th.

The Indian currency is weighed by the strength of the American currency in the overseas market and continued foreign fund outflows. Further, rupee slipped on surge in crude oil prices

Foreign institutional investors were net sellers in the capital market on Friday, as they offloaded shares worth Rs 5,517.08 crore, as per stock exchange data. They have been selling equities constantly in the recent months.

Rupee has been under-pressure after global central banks started normalising policy and last week RBI too started raising key interest rates.

On Friday, the rupee had slumped 55 paise to close at 76.90 against the US dollar.

“Local units are also hit by haven dollar flows, higher global rates due to rising inflation and risk-off sentiments. Weakness in Chinese yuan, which fell to its weakest level since November 2020, also weighing on regional currencies,” said Dilip Parmar, Retail Research Analyst at HDFC Securities.

So far this year, foreign institutions have withdrawn a total of nearly $19 billion from domestic equities and debt markets, Parmar said.

Parmar sees near term depreciation in rupee could continue for a few more days with lower side limited in the range of 77.70 to 78. In the event of unwinding, the rupee could see levels of 77 to 76.70.

According to Sugandha Sachdeva, VP-Commodity and Currency Research at Religare Broking, the Indian rupee has plummeted to record lows amid the deteriorating risk sentiments and the unrelenting spree of overseas outflows from the domestic equities.

Besides, an unabated rise in the dollar index towards a two-decade high, soaring US treasury yields and crude prices, all of them have worked their way to push the domestic currency on a downward trajectory, Sachdeva told IANS.

“Markets are concerned about the spiralling inflation and prospects of an aggressive tightening path that continues to threaten the growth outlook, leading to safe-haven flows in the greenback.”

Also, hardening crude oil prices as the EU is moving ahead to impose an embargo on Russian oil are roiling the sentiments, leading to worries about the widening current account deficit and exacerbating the pressure on the domestic currency.

Going ahead, as the Indian rupee has breached the previous all-time lows of the 77.14-mark, it seems poised to witness further depreciation towards the 78-mark in the near term.

Sachdeva, however, anticipates that RBI will intervene around the 78-mark to curb excessive depreciation in the Indian currency.

According to experts, this depreciation is caused by the strength of the American currency in the overseas market and continuous foreign fund outflows from the Indian market. Some also attribute the fall of the rupee to rising crude oil prices globally due to the Russia-Ukraine crisis and the COVID induced lockdown in Shanghai.

Toyota To Invest $ 624 Million In India

Toyota Group plans to invest 48 billion Indian rupees ($624 million) to make electric vehicle components in India, as the Japanese carmaker works toward carbon neutrality by 2050.

Toyota Kirloskar Motor and Toyota Kirloskar Auto Parts signed a memorandum of understanding with the southern state of Karnataka to invest 41 billion Indian rupees, the group said in a statement Saturday. The rest will come from Toyota Industries Engine India.

Toyota is aligning its own green targets with India’s ambitions of becoming a manufacturing hub though the switch to clean transport in the South Asian nation is slower than other countries such as China and the U.S. Expensive price tags, lack of options in electric models and insufficient charging stations have led to sluggish adoption of battery vehicles in India.

“From a direct employment point of view, we are looking at around 3,500 new jobs,” Toyota Kirloskar executive vice president Vikram Gulati told the Press Trust of India in an interview. “As the supply chain system builds, we expect much more to come in later.”

He added that the company would be moving toward a new area of technology — electrified powertrain parts — with production set to start in the “very near-term.”

Indian automakers could generate $20 billion in revenue from electric vehicles between now and fiscal year 2026, according to forecast by Crisil. By 2040, 53% of new automobile sales in India will be electric, compared with 77% in China, according to BloombergNEF.

Gautam Adani Is World’s 5th Richest Person

Gautam Adani, the Indian infrastructure mogul, became the richest Asian billionaire in history earlier this month–and he’s kept on climbing, reported Forbes magazine.

“Adani has now passed Warren Buffett to become the 5th richest person in the world,” said Forbes, estimating that the 59-year-old Adani has a net worth of $123.7 billion, as of Friday’s market close, edging out the $121.7 billion fortune of Buffett, who is 91.

Worth $8.9 billion just two years ago, Adani’s fortune spiked to an estimated $50.5 billion in March 2021 because of his skyrocketing share prices–then nearly doubled by March 2022, to an estimated $90 billion, as Adani Group stocks rose even further, according to Forbes.

“Adani’s estimated $123.7 billion net worth makes him the richest person in India, $19 billion wealthier than the country’s number 2, Mukesh Ambani (who’s worth an estimated $104.7 billion). He surpasses Buffett as shares of the famed investor’s Berkshire Hathaway dropped by 2% on Friday amid a broad drop in the U.S. stock market,” said Forbes.

There are now only four people on the planet richer than Adani, according to Forbes’ real-time billionaire tracker: Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates (worth an estimated $130.2 billion), French luxury goods king Bernard Arnault ($167.9 billion), Amazon founder Jeff Bezos ($170.2 billion) and Tesla and SpaceX chief Elon Musk ($269.7 billion), according to Forbes.

World today has 2,668 billionaires, including 236 newcomers—far fewer than last year’s 493

Forbes’ 36th annual World’s Billionaires List, released earlier this month, reveals 2,668 billionaires, including 236 newcomers—far fewer than last year’s 493.

Elon Musk tops the World’s Billionaires ranking for the first time ever, with an estimated net worth of $219 billion. Altogether the total net worth of the world’s billionaires is $12.7 trillion, down from last year’s $13.1 trillion.

Following last year’s record-breaking number of billionaires, the past 12 months have proven to be more volatile. The number of billionaires fell to 2,668, down from 2,755 last year. A total of 329 people dropped off the list this year—the most in a single year since the 2009 financial crisis.

“The tumultuous stock market contributed to sharp declines in the fortunes of many of the world’s richest,” said Kerry A. Dolan, Assistant Managing Editor of Wealth, Forbes. “Still, more than 1,000 billionaires got wealthier over the past year. The top 20 richest alone are worth a combined $2 trillion, up from $1.8 trillion in 2021.”

Key facts for the 2022 World’s Billionaires list:

  • Top Five: Tesla’s Elon Musk tops the list, unseating Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, who drops to the No. 2 spot after spending the past four years as the richest person in the world. Bernard Arnault of LVMH remains at No. 3, followed by Bill Gates at No. 4. Rounding out the top five is Warren Buffett, who rejoins the top five after falling to No. 6 last year.
  • Newcomers: Among the list of notable newcomers are Lord of the Rings director Peter Jackson(No.1929); OpenSea founders Devin Finzer and Alex Atallah (Nos. 1397); social media and e-commerce tycoon Miranda Qu (No. 1645) and pop star and cosmetics mogul Rihanna (No. 1729).
  • Self-Made: Of the total 2,668 people on the 2022 ranking, 1,891 are self-made billionaires, who founded or cofounded a company or established their own fortune (as opposed to inheriting it).
  • Women: There are 327 women billionaires, including 16 who share a fortune with a spouse, child or sibling, down from 328 in 2021.
  • Globally: Regionally, Asia-Pacific boasts the most billionaires, with 1,088, followed by the United States, with 735, and Europe, with 592.
  • Drop-offs: The war in Ukraine, a Chinese tech crackdown and slipping stock prices pushed 329 people off the World’s Billionaires list this year, including 169 one-hit wonders who were part of last year’s record 493 newcomers.

To view the full list, visit www.forbes.com/billionaires.

The 2022 Billionaires issue features five consecutive covers, including:

  • Igor Bukhman: When Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine, Igor Bukhman, the Russia-born billionaire founder of gaming company Playrix, found himself with thousands of employees divided by the frontlines. His internal battlefield offers lessons for us all.
  • Ken Griffin: War in Europe. The China-Russia alliance. De-dollarization. Ken Griffin, Wall Street’s billionaire kingpin, is making the best out of the worst of times.
  • Tope Awotona: Awotona built Calendly out of frustration. Now the scheduling app is worth $3 billion—and the subject of a heated Twitter spat among Silicon Valley elite.
  • Ryan Breslow: Bolt cofounder Ryan Breslow has boosted the value of his fintech to the moon by promising an Amazon-style checkout to millions of online retailers. Now the new billionaire is making a lot of noise—and some powerful enemies—challenging the tech industry’s culture and ethics.
  • Falguni Nayar: A decade ago, when she was 49, Nayar left behind her investment banking career to launch beauty-and-fashion retailer Nykaa. She took it public in November and is now India’s richest self-made woman. Nykaa, which means “one in the spotlight,” currently sells more than 4,000 brands online and in its 102 stores.

The Forbes World’s Billionaires list is a snapshot of wealth using stock prices and currency exchange rates from March 11, 2022.

-+=