A new tax proposal introduced by the House Republicans on May 12, 2025, has raised significant concerns for Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) residing in the United States. Among the provisions in the legislation is a contentious clause that would impose a 5% tax on international money transfers made by non-citizens. This proposed measure marks a notable shift in American tax policy, particularly affecting foreign workers who consistently send funds back to their families in their home countries.
The primary objective of the broader legislation is to make permanent several key elements of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This includes plans to increase the standard deduction and extend the child tax credit to $2,500 through 2028. The bill has received full support from U.S. President Donald Trump, who is now serving his second term. He described the legislation as “GREAT” and strongly encouraged Republican lawmakers to ensure its swift passage.
The 5% tax on remittances is aimed at generating revenue to fund extended tax breaks and bolster border security efforts. Supporters argue that it could potentially raise billions for the U.S. Treasury. However, this financial burden would fall directly on the shoulders of immigrants who are already contributing significantly to the economy through their labor and taxes. The measure, if enacted, would be particularly taxing for NRIs who maintain strong financial ties with their families in India.
Currently, India is the world’s leading recipient of remittances, with approximately $83 billion sent annually from overseas. A large share of this amount comes from Indian workers living in the U.S. Under the proposed law, a 5% cut would be applied to every transfer. This means that for every ₹1 lakh (in dollar terms) sent to India, ₹5,000 (in dollar terms) would be diverted to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) before reaching its intended destination. Until now, these remittances have not been taxed by the U.S., making this move a stark departure from previous norms.
Such a policy change would have deep financial consequences for NRIs. Remittances are not just money transfers—they are a vital financial lifeline that supports various aspects of life back home. These include everyday living expenses for family members, the purchase of property, tuition fees for education, and medical bills. The proposed tax would reduce the value of every dollar sent, affecting both short-term assistance and long-term financial planning.
The bill is being pushed through Congress on an accelerated schedule. The House of Representatives plans to vote on the bill by Memorial Day, which falls on May 26, 2025. Following that, the legislation would move to the Senate for approval. Lawmakers aim to have the bill signed into law by July 4. If enacted, the 5% remittance tax would take effect almost immediately. Financial institutions and money transfer companies would be required to deduct the tax at the point of transfer, without regard to the size or purpose of the remittance.
This could greatly disrupt how NRIs currently manage their finances. Whether the purpose is to support elderly parents, contribute to a sibling’s education, or invest in real estate in India, the remittance tax would eat into the funds being sent. It would apply to all conventional and lawful methods of money transfer, including services offered by traditional banks and transactions made via NRE (Non-Resident External) and NRO (Non-Resident Ordinary) accounts. This leaves very little room for tax avoidance without violating financial compliance laws.
With the tax’s implementation timeline moving rapidly, NRIs are urged to act without delay. Those planning large or essential money transfers are advised to do so before the expected July deadline in order to escape the new levy. Additionally, NRIs may want to reconsider the structure of their remittances. For example, sending fewer but larger amounts could help reduce the total cost of the tax. However, this strategy must be balanced with U.S. financial regulations. Any international transfer exceeding $10,000 remains subject to mandatory reporting under the Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Report (FBAR) and Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) rules.
Over the longer term, the passage of the bill would necessitate a rethinking of financial and tax planning strategies among NRIs. Budgeting will have to accommodate the extra costs involved. Investment plans that include regular transfers will need to be adjusted. Alternative means of supporting family members, such as through dual-account arrangements or shared investments in India, might be considered. Above all, maintaining detailed records of all international transfers will become more critical. Proper documentation will be essential not just for compliance with tax authorities, but also for safeguarding legal and financial clarity in the future.
The 5% remittance tax is not yet law, but if passed, it would introduce a fundamental change in how NRIs manage their money and support loved ones overseas. The Indian American community in the U.S., which plays a significant role in both economies, could be especially affected. Until now, the ability to freely send untaxed funds back to India has been a cornerstone of financial planning for many NRIs. If this bill becomes law, that benefit would be significantly curtailed.
As it stands, the bill has not yet been enacted, and opposition is likely to surface from various advocacy groups and political stakeholders concerned about the negative impact on immigrants. However, with strong backing from President Trump and the Republican leadership, there is growing momentum for the bill’s approval. Immigrant communities, financial advisors, and money transfer companies will be watching closely as the legislation moves through Congress.
In essence, this proposal is more than a simple tax tweak—it is a dramatic policy change that alters the financial landscape for NRIs. It brings into question the balance between national fiscal goals and the needs of immigrant workers who continue to play a vital role in the U.S. economy while supporting families abroad. For now, the Indian diaspora and other non-citizen residents in the U.S. will need to prepare for the possibility of a more expensive and complex remittance process in the very near future.
Luxury Jewelry is well-known for its sophisticated designs and utilization of the most precious and uncommon unrefined substances. The Luxury Jewelry Market is vigorous and quickly developing. It’s also exceptionally divided and determined by buyer conduct and style. In the nearing years, huge market development is normal, from increasing extra cash and amplifying buyer consumption of extravagant merchandise. Assimilating the luxury gems industry with diversion and allure businesses has set new open doors for the market.
Born in Los Angeles, she began acting at 14 and took a lead role in “The Toll of the Sea” three years later, in 1922. She went on to appear in dozens of movies but faced deeply entrenched racism in Hollywood, where she struggled to break from stereotypical roles.
The Education Department’s technical team will be responding to potential issues in real-time, and although the application itself won’t change, the team may make changes to the website if faced with any glitches. 
The dollar is also soaring in destinations like Thailand, India and South Korea — countries with ample tourism interest from Americans and relatively weaker economic growth than the U.S. 
Bill Gates is moving $20 billion of his wealth into the endowment of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which is ramping up its spending in the face of global challenges, including the pandemic and the war in Ukraine, media reports said. 
It’s a sharp departure from the previous two years, when the fortunes of the ultra-rich swelled as governments and central banks unleashed unprecedented stimulus measures in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, juicing the value of everything from tech companies to cryptocurrencies.
At least at first, 
“After holding their breath for nearly a week awaiting the US CPI report for May, investors exhaled in exasperation as inflation came in hotter than expected,” Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA, said in a note to clients Monday morning.
He said that when Berkshire’s stock fell, there was nothing wrong with the company. He said that the mind of the investor should be right. Otherwise, your life will be spent in buying and selling shares at the wrong time and you will continue to cry for loss. Investors take decisions on the advice of others when prices fluctuate.