Texas Floods Raise Concerns Over Job Cuts Impact on Forecasts

Staffing cuts at the National Weather Service (NWS) are under scrutiny after deadly flooding in Texas, with at least 80 fatalities highlighting concerns about reduced forecasts and weather warnings.

The National Weather Service has come under intense criticism following numerous deaths resulting from torrential rains and flash flooding in the Texas Hill Country. Local officials voiced dissatisfaction with the weather forecasts provided, although comments largely stopped short of directly linking the perceived inadequacies to cuts in staffing imposed under President Donald Trump’s administration.

In the wake of the disaster, which reportedly claimed the lives of over two dozen girls and counselors at a Guadalupe River summer camp, Democrats have not hesitated to connect the staffing reductions at the NWS to the tragic events. Despite this critique, current and former NWS officials defended the agency’s actions, citing urgent flash flood warnings dispatched early Friday morning before the river’s abrupt rise.

Brian LaMarre, former meteorologist-in-charge at the NWS forecast office in Tampa, Florida, noted, “This was an exceptional service to come out first with the catastrophic flash flood warning and this shows the awareness of the meteorologists on shift at the NWS office.” LaMarre emphasized the significant urgency reflected in the early warnings issued by the service.

Nevertheless, concerns have arisen regarding the level of coordination and communication between the NWS and local officials during the incident. The Trump administration’s cuts have resulted in down-sizing by at least 20% at nearly half of the 122 NWS field offices across the country and a reduction in round-the-clock staffing at several offices. Furthermore, early retirements were encouraged among experienced forecasters and senior managers, leading to gaps in crucial positions.

The budget for the NWS’s parent agency has also been targeted, with proposals to slash funding by 27% and eliminate federal research centers devoted to weather, climate, and oceanic studies.

The situation is particularly concerning at the NWS office responsible for the afflicted area, Austin/San Antonio. Six out of 27 positions there remain vacant. These include a key managerial role essential for issuing weather warnings and coordinating with emergency management officials, left unfilled following an early retirement after 17 years of service.

As the situation continues to unfold, Senator Chuck Schumer and other Democrats have pressed for a detailed inquiry into the potential impact of staffing shortages on the tragic loss of life during the floods in Texas.

President Trump has countered claims that these job eliminations hampered the NWS’s ability to forecast weather accurately, stating, “The raging waters were a thing that happened in seconds. No one expected it. Nobody saw it.”

Source: Original article

Musk Plans New Political Party After Trump Tax Dispute

Elon Musk announced the formation of the America Party following a split with President Donald Trump over the president’s new tax cuts law, marking a potential shift in the political landscape.

BRIDGEWATER, N.J. — Elon Musk has made good on a previous declaration to establish a new political party, revealing the launch of the America Party in response to President Donald Trump’s recently enacted tax cuts law. This move comes as Musk distances himself from Trump, with whom he previously had close political ties.

Musk’s departure from the Republican president’s support was initiated by dissatisfaction with the tax legislation, which Trump signed on Friday. The bill’s approval by Congress prompted Musk to threaten the creation of the “America Party,” expressing his concern about excessive government spending.

“When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,” Musk stated on X, the social media platform he owns. “Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.”

On Sunday, as Musk prepared to leave his New Jersey residence for a return to Washington, Trump addressed the media regarding Musk’s new party, dismissing the idea as “ridiculous.” Trump highlighted the Republican Party’s significant achievements, while also suggesting that third parties historically introduce confusion.

While new political parties are not uncommon in the U.S., they often struggle to draw substantial support away from the major Republican and Democratic parties. However, Musk, being the world’s richest individual, has the potential to influence the 2026 congressional elections if he chooses to allocate substantial financial resources to the America Party. Musk has previously invested at least $250 million backing Trump in the 2024 election.

The renewed discord with Trump could have significant ramifications for Musk, as several of his business enterprises, including Tesla, benefit from substantial government contracts. The lack of clarity regarding the formal establishment of the America Party remains, as spokespeople for Musk and his political action committee, America PAC, have not commented.

Notably, several political entities listed in the Federal Election Commission database appeared after Musk’s announcement on Saturday, including variations of “America Party” names or affiliations with Musk. However, many were not legitimate, with contact information appearing as unverifiable addresses.

Moreover, on Sunday morning, Musk engaged users on X, gathering insights on the America Party and indicating plans to participate in the 2026 midterm elections. Last month, Musk expressed intentions to challenge every congressional member who supported Trump’s tax legislation, criticizing it as a “disgusting abomination.”

His critique extended to the expanded federal deficit and criticized the Republican Party, which controls the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, for enlarging the government and national debt by five trillion dollars.

Musk’s decision to form a political party reflects a significant change from his stance in May when he indicated an intention to reduce political engagement as his tenure in the White House closed.

Scott Bessent, Treasury Secretary, and former Doge boss, acknowledged on CNN’s “State of the Union” that Musk’s principles resonated with some, but noted polling suggested Musk himself was not popular. “I imagine that those board of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities,” Bessent remarked.

Source: Original article

Indian Applicants Face US Visa Appointment Challenges Despite Consulate Interviews

Since the U.S. consulates in India resumed F-1 student visa interviews, applicants still face chaos, with scarce appointments and growing uncertainty threatening their educational plans.

Despite the resumption of F-1 student visa interviews at U.S. consulates in India on June 26, students continue to struggle with securing appointments, leading to significant anxiety and uncertainty.

As students prepare for the start of their courses in August, they face the challenge of obtaining visa appointments in a timely manner. The lack of available slots, coupled with the increase in 221(g) administrative processing notices, is jeopardizing their plans and investments.

LaunchEd co-founder Kajal Dave described the situation as “a mess,” pointing out that many students who have already paid tuition, booked flights, and found housing are unable to secure visa appointments. The financial implications are severe, with potential losses estimated to range between ₹12 and ₹35 lakh, covering tuition fees, housing deposits, and airfare if students cannot travel in time and their universities do not permit deferrals.

One student expressed their frustration and panic online, stating that visa slots in India have not been opened, leaving them feeling lost and hopeless as their course is set to begin on August 20.

Another student shared a similar concern, saying their university recommended deferring enrollment to the next fall due to these issues. The additional concern of receiving a 221(g) notice after securing an interview adds further uncertainty, as visa approvals remain on indefinite hold.

The U.S. Embassy website has recently cautioned that student or exchange visitor visa applicants without existing appointments may not be able to schedule an interview this summer, amplifying students’ worries.

This situation follows a month-long visa freeze from May 27 to June 26, hitting the peak student season and compounding broader systematic issues. According to a report by Business Standard, these challenges stem from a substantial backlog and an evolving adjudication policy, with increased scrutiny over digital footprints and social media causing further delays.

Currently, the wait time for appointments in India averages 45 to 60 days, with Kolkata experiencing the longest delays. As a result, many students are missing important university start dates.

Experts recommend that students facing these challenges can apply for emergency appointments through UStraveldocs or consult with their university’s Designated School Official (DSO) regarding deferral or temporary online study options. Ensuring that Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) and I-20 documents are up to date is also crucial if deferring is necessary.

The root of the current slot shortage combines the aforementioned visa freeze during a critical period and stricter visa vetting processes implemented in recent years. While students may request emergency appointments via the official UStraveldocs website, they must provide appropriate university documentation to support their application.

The U.S. Embassy has not confirmed if additional bulk slot openings will occur before the August 2025 intake, leaving students uncertain about future opportunities to secure their visas in time.

According to Business Standard

Source: Original article

Bill Gates Falls from Top 10 Richest, Ex-Microsoft CEO Enters

Microsoft founder Bill Gates has fallen out of the top ten list of America’s wealthiest individuals, a significant shift linked primarily to his 2021 divorce from Melinda French Gates.

Bill Gates, the iconic founder of Microsoft, has experienced a notable decline in his status among the wealthiest individuals in America. His ranking has plummeted to No. 9 on the 2023 list of America’s wealthiest, a drop from his previous rank of No. 6. For almost two decades, beginning in 1990, Gates consistently appeared as either the richest or the second-richest person on these prestigious lists.

The primary reason for this shift in Gates’ wealth standing is his highly publicized divorce from Melinda French Gates in 2021. The divorce settlement, which turned out to be nearly triple what was initially projected, served as a significant blow to his net worth. Melinda French Gates has now emerged as one of the richest women in the United States following the division of their assets.

The divorce settlement has notably increased Melinda French Gates’ financial standing, with her current net worth soaring to around $29 billion from $10.3 billion just a year ago. This ascent makes her the ninth-richest woman in the country.

As Bill Gates’ net worth has taken a hit, he remains devoted to his philanthropic missions. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation continues to target global health and development, although questions persist about the foundation’s future trajectory in the absence of Melinda’s leadership.

Gates has openly stated in media interviews that a decline in his wealth ranking was inevitable. He also mentioned there’s a possibility that he and Melinda may not continue working together on philanthropic initiatives, yet he reaffirmed that the Gates Foundation plans to operate for another 25 years.

Meanwhile, Melinda French Gates has launched her own philanthropic venture, Pivotal Ventures, focusing on empowering women and families.

According to The Times of India, Gates’ wealth and philanthropic strategies continue to capture global attention, highlighting ongoing discussions about wealth, partnerships, and the future of their foundation.

Source: Original article

Seven Habits to Drop for Happiness in Your 70s – Health

To make the most of your 70s, consider letting go of certain behaviors that may hinder your happiness and embrace a new outlook on life.

The notion that older individuals cannot change is a misconception. Even as the years pass, there remains ample opportunity to learn, grow, and embrace behaviors that enhance our quality of life.

Envision your 70s as a time brimming with joy, fulfillment, and happiness. This dream is achievable, but first, it might require identifying and letting go of certain behaviors that limit your enjoyment of these golden years.

If you’re wondering how to enhance the joy and satisfaction in your 70s, consider these seven behaviors that may be worth abandoning.

The first is letting go of past regrets. Mistakes are an inherent part of being human, but holding onto regret can add unnecessary stress and deprive you of present happiness. Acknowledge your past without dwelling on it. Instead, use those experiences as learning opportunities to enhance your present and future self.

Next, don’t neglect your health. Many of us may have once felt invincible, perhaps ignoring routine check-ups and indulging in unhealthy habits. However, prioritizing your health can profoundly impact your quality of life. Scheduling regular medical visits, adopting a balanced diet, and enjoying some physical activity, such as a morning walk, can increase your energy and overall happiness.

Being resistant to change can also hinder joy. Routine and familiarity provide comfort, yet life is always in flux. Embracing change can open up opportunities for growth and unexpected joys, whether it’s moving to a new location or exploring new activities. Flexibility can lead to meaningful and joyful experiences.

Spending time with positive people is another way to enhance happiness. Surrounding yourself with negativity can heavily influence your outlook on life. By choosing to spend more time with uplifting individuals, you facilitate a more positive mindset and invigorated day-to-day life.

Hobbies play a vital role in personal happiness. They offer a break from the monotony of daily routines and allow for stress relief. Reconnecting with past interests or discovering new ones can provide a gratifying way to spend your time, bring joy, and stimulate mental health.

Don’t underestimate the importance of self-love. Caring for others often takes precedence, but acknowledging your own worth and taking time for yourself can be transformational. When you invest in self-care, you may find an increase in contentment and well-being.

Finally, strive to live in the present. By practicing mindfulness and fully engaging with the current moment, whether it’s during simple activities like sipping coffee or conversing with loved ones, you foster an appreciation for life as it is now. Happiness lies in the present; embracing it can lead to fulfillment.

Each of these steps towards change is an opportunity to cultivate joy and happiness in your 70s. Remember, it’s never too late to transform your life and begin a new chapter filled with joy and gratitude.

According to Source Name, this approach involves letting go of what no longer serves you, rather than adding more to your life. Embrace these principles and make the most of every moment in your 70s.

Source: Original article

Docu-Drama on Biscuit King Rajan Pillai Underway

Filmmakers Sanjeev Sivan and Deepthi Pillay have embarked on a feature docu-drama exploring the compelling life story of Rajan Pillai, famously known as the ‘Biscuit King’ of Kerala.

Rajan Pillai’s life and legacy, marked by both success and controversy, are set to be chronicled in a new feature docu-drama by filmmaker Sanjeev Sivan and his wife, Deepthi Pillay. Pillai, a renowned businessman, remains a figure of fascination, known for his meteoric rise and tragic fall.

Sanjeev Sivan, who hails from the same region as Pillai, spoke with IANS about the project. Although he never met Rajan Pillai personally, Sanjeev was deeply influenced by Pillai’s reputation during his formative years. “He was what most young Malayalis of our generation aspired to become,” Sanjeev said, describing Pillai as an emblem of success and vision. The filmmaker’s connection to Pillai’s family extends through his own father, Sivan, a celebrated filmmaker who was a close friend of Rajan’s father, Janardhan Pillai.

Rajan Pillai’s story is one of transformation and ambition. He started as a cashew exporter, eventually becoming a key player in Britannia, a major name in the food industry that brought immense pride to Kerala. However, Sanjeev notes that Pillai’s trusting nature played a significant role in his downfall, describing it as his most fatal flaw.

The Sivan family is steeped in cinematic heritage; Sanjeev’s father was a National Award-winning filmmaker, while his brother, Santosh Sivan, is a celebrated cinematographer. Another brother, the late Sangeeth Sivan, was a noted director.

The docu-drama stems from exhaustive research undertaken by Sanjeev, Deepthi, and writer-researcher Anirban Bhattacharya. To craft the narrative, they have enlisted top international talent, including Zach Sklar, known for scripting Oliver Stone’s Oscar-winning film JFK.

A critical part of the film’s preparation involved connecting with Rajan Pillai’s widow, Nina Pillai, and their sons, Shiva and Krish. Sanjeev acknowledged that gaining the family’s trust was a significant hurdle. Nevertheless, the encounter became a pivotal moment, revealing untold stories and hidden aspects of Pillai’s life. “Nina now trusts us fully — we’re like family,” Sanjeev remarked, emphasizing their commitment to unveiling the true narrative of Rajan Pillai’s life.

The filmmakers aim to portray not only the triumphs of Rajan’s life but also the elements of trust and betrayal that led to his downfall. “His story is shrouded in mystery, but we’re determined to bring it all to light,” Sanjeev said. He views the project as not only a tribute to Rajan Pillai but also as a cautionary tale rich with lessons about misplaced trust and political manipulation.

As work on the feature docu-drama progresses, Sanjeev Sivan and his team are dedicated to presenting a comprehensive account of Rajan Pillai’s life. “This is the least I can do for a man who inspired an entire generation of Keralites to dream big,” Sanjeev stated, underscoring the importance of preserving and examining this remarkable figure’s legacy for future generations.

According to World Malayalee Voice.

Source: Original article

Aamir Khan Film Achieves Historic Milestone for Indian Cinema

Aamir Khan’s latest film, “Sitaare Zameen Par,” has made history by becoming the first Indian movie to be fully accessible to audiences with visual, hearing, or speech impairments, grossing over ₹200 crore worldwide.

Aamir Khan’s “Sitaare Zameen Par” has taken the box office by storm and reached a diverse audience, earning a place among the highest-grossing films of 2025. Heralded as the spiritual sequel to the critically acclaimed “Taare Zameen Par,” this film has marked a pivotal moment in Indian cinema by grossing over ₹200 crore worldwide, according to industry tracker Sacnilk.

Released on June 20, 2025, “Sitaare Zameen Par” stands out not just financially but also in its pioneering approach to inclusivity. The film has been crafted with closed captions, audio descriptions, and Indian Sign Language (ISL), ensuring it can be thoroughly enjoyed by viewers with disabilities. This achievement highlights Aamir Khan’s vision to create a film experience that transcends traditional barriers, offering accessibility to a wider demographic.

The movie’s impressive accessibility features have set a new benchmark in an industry where such inclusive practices have been limited. While international films often incorporate various accessibility tools, “Sitaare Zameen Par” is a trailblazer in Indian cinema for its integration of ISL. This has been facilitated through the innovative use of the XL Cinema app, which synchronizes with the audio track in theaters and provides real-time interpretation for deaf and hard-of-hearing audiences.

The XL Cinema app allows users to access an ISL interpreter directly on their mobile devices, enhancing the viewing experience for those with hearing impairments. By providing closed captions and detailed audio cues, it ensures that essential elements of the storyline and ambient audio are communicated effectively, thereby bringing a richer, more engaging cinematic experience to all viewers regardless of their sensory capabilities.

Aamir Khan’s dedication to inclusivity in “Sitaare Zameen Par” illustrates a significant step forward in making entertainment accessible and enjoyable for everyone. With this film, the Indian film industry not only acknowledges the diverse needs of its audience but also sets a global example of how cinema can cater to all kinds of people, bridging gaps in understanding and enjoyment through thoughtful inclusivity.

Experts Challenge Global Debt and Finance Rules at Vatican Meeting

The Vatican has issued a call for comprehensive reforms to the global financial system, highlighting its role in exacerbating poverty and inequality.

The Vatican has emerged as a key voice challenging the current global financial structure, advocating for significant reforms aimed at addressing poverty and inequality. Some of the boldest proposals for tackling international debt do not originate from traditional economic powerhouses but from within the Vatican itself.

This initiative was evident at the United Nations’ 4th International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville, Spain, where the Holy See and Caritas Internationalis emphasized the urgent need for a resolution to the debt crisis affecting many countries. Archbishop Gabriele Caccia, the Vatican’s permanent observer to the U.N., highlighted the plight of developing nations forced to choose between debt service and essential services for their populations. He urged bold action to correct these injustices.

Developing countries currently hold about a third of the global public debt, which topped $102 trillion in 2024, according to the U.N. Trade and Development organization (UNCTAD). Last year, these countries paid $921 billion in net interest, with approximately 3.4 billion people living in nations that allocate more funds to debt repayment than to health and education.

Alistair Dutton, the Secretary General of Caritas, categorized the debt crisis as one of the most rectifiable challenges in global finance, contingent on sufficient political resolve. He advocated for a system that encourages creditors to renegotiate debt and urged international financial institutions to collaborate on a more sustainable debt framework.

This push for reform is aligned with the Vatican’s Jubilee year, a traditional concept rooted in the Hebrew Bible’s Book of Leviticus, which calls for the periodic forgiveness of debts, freedom for slaves, and land redistribution. Pope Francis invoked this tradition by appealing to world leaders to forgive the debts of struggling nations.

Inspired by this vision, the Jubilee Report was developed by the Vatican’s Academy of Social Sciences. It calls for a new global economic structure, including the creation of a sovereign bankruptcy process, broader debt relief, and legal reforms to combat predatory lending practices. The document, endorsed by Pope Leo XIV, was co-authored by notable economists such as Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz and former Argentine Finance Minister Martín Guzmán, along with economist Mark Weisbrot.

The report also recommends expanding Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), an International Monetary Fund asset used during emergencies without the burden of interest or policy conditions. In 2021, during the COVID-19 crisis, the IMF distributed $650 billion in SDRs, with $200 billion directed towards developing countries.

Weisbrot highlighted the negative impact of economic conditionalities, often imposed by wealthy nations and international entities, citing Argentina as a prominent example. In 2018, Argentina received a record $57 billion loan from the IMF under stringent austerity conditions. According to Weisbrot, these measures exacerbated inflation and economic instability rather than providing relief.

Weisbrot argues that such issues stem from a lack of accountability in the global financial system, which predominantly serves the interests of affluent nations. The IMF, with significant influence from the U.S. Treasury, shapes the global economy, Weisbrot says, often to the detriment of poorer nations.

Pope Leo XIV appears committed to continuing the efforts of Pope Francis by challenging global economic norms and addressing the injustices inherent in the current system. “The Jubilee Report and the conference in Seville reflect a continuity in the Vatican’s agenda,” Weisbrot noted, emphasizing their importance in addressing life-and-death issues on a global scale.

Pope Leo XIV Approves Eco-Friendly Mass Initiative

Pope Leo XIV has approved a new Mass emphasizing environmental stewardship, amid Europe’s ongoing heat waves and wildfires.

As Europe faces unprecedented heatwaves, resulting in soaring temperatures, wildfires, and fatalities, the Vatican took a significant step toward environmental consciousness by unveiling a new liturgy for Mass on Thursday. This revised Mass specifically addresses the church’s responsibility to protect the planet, incorporating prayers, readings, and hymns aligned with this mission.

During a press conference, Cardinal Michael Czerny, who leads the Vatican’s Dicastery for Integral Human Development, expressed that the new Mass “can be used to ask God for the ability to care for creation.”

The Mass, titled Pro Custodia Creationis (For the Care of Creation), was initially conceptualized by Pope Francis, who consistently emphasized ecological responsibility throughout his papacy, notably in his 2015 encyclical, “Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home.” Pope Leo XIV appears poised to continue this focus on the environment, marking a continuity with his predecessors’ social concerns. He plans to privately celebrate the new Mass at Borgo Laudato Si’, an ecologically-minded village project initiated by Francis, located within the gardens of the papal summer residence at Castel Gandolfo, on Wednesday.

The new Mass will join the list of 17 existing Masses dedicated to specific civil needs, such as those for the harvest, rain, and migration, drawing inspiration from Francis’ “green” encyclical, which marks its 10th anniversary this year.

A collaborative effort between the Dicastery for Integral Human Development and the Dicastery for Divine Worship, the Mass is inspired by St. John Paul II’s 1990 World Day of Peace message that highlighted the relationship between humanity and the environment. Cardinal Czerny noted, “In a world where the most vulnerable of our brothers and sisters are the first to suffer the devastating effects of climate change, deforestation, and pollution, care for creation becomes an expression of our faith and humanity.”

Monsignor Vittorio Francesco Viola, the secretary of the Vatican’s liturgical department, explained that the Mass begins with an entrance antiphon that themed around “the glory of God” as revealed through creation. This liturgical celebration reaches its pinnacle during the Eucharist, concluding with a post-Communion prayer reflecting humanity’s intrinsic connection to God, neighbors, and the Earth—a relationship disrupted by sin, as discussed in “Laudato Si’.”

In this Mass, readings from the Gospel of Matthew illustrate God’s care for “the lilies of the field and the birds of the air,” and recount Jesus calming the storm, emphasizing believers’ responsibility to safeguard the environment. These readings challenge interpretations of Genesis that support human dominion over nature for personal gain.

Cardinal Czerny remarked, “This Mass is a reason for joy,” adding that it “calls us to be faithful stewards of what God has entrusted to us—not only in daily choices and public policies but also in our prayer, our worship, and our way of living in the world.”

The unveiling of Pro Custodia Creationis underscores the Vatican’s commitment to integrating environmental stewardship into religious practice, spotlighting the interconnection between spirituality and ecological responsibility.

According to Religion News Service, this initiative reflects the Vatican’s acknowledgment of the pressing need for faith communities to actively engage in promoting environmental care.

118 Million Indian Women Join Credit System After a Decade

In a significant advancement for financial inclusion, 118 million women in India have accessed formal credit for the first time in a decade, opening new pathways for economic opportunity.

In India, 118 million women have joined the formal credit system over the past ten years, marking a major step toward financial inclusion and providing them with economic avenues that were previously inaccessible. This finding is part of a report released by TransUnion CIBIL on Thursday during a conference in Mumbai.

The study revealed that over the past two decades, 714 million individuals nationwide have gained access to formal credit, significantly transforming household economies and expanding financial participation across the country.

Furthermore, retail credit delinquencies—defined as accounts that are 90 days or more overdue—have improved by 130 basis points in the last decade. This improvement reflects healthier credit behavior and more prudent lending practices across India.

As credit availability extends to new regions and previously underserved populations, the emphasis is shifting to broadening financial access through data-driven insights, increased transparency, and informed risk management.

“Credit reporting systems today are a key pillar of the national financial architecture,” noted M. Rajeshwar Rao, Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). He explained how these systems promote broader credit access, enhance financial inclusion, assist regulatory oversight, and improve financial stability.

Rao stressed the importance of financially literate consumers in maintaining a robust credit environment. “Regulations may demand transparency, but fostering financial literacy is a collective responsibility that requires continuous effort by all involved institutions,” he told attendees.

The establishment of credit information companies (CICs) marked a significant milestone in India’s efforts to democratize credit access. “Even today, CICs play a critical role in realizing the vision of full financial inclusion,” Rao added.

Bhavesh Jain, Managing Director and CEO of TransUnion CIBIL, pointed out the growing inclusiveness and transparency within India’s credit ecosystem. He remarked, “Reliable data empowers lenders to make informed decisions, which in turn helps borrowers enhance their financial profiles. Our mission is to responsibly and sustainably guide all stakeholders through this transformation.”

Echoing the sentiment, Amitabh Chaudhry, MD and CEO of Axis Bank, emphasized the importance of financial education. “We must invest in financial literacy to help borrowers understand credit health and long-term financial planning,” he said.

According to India New England News, this advancement represents a transformative shift in making financial services more accessible to women, fostering a more inclusive and equitable economic landscape.

Religious Devotion Surrounds Puri for Lord Jagannath’s Suna Besha Event

A wave of devotion enveloped Puri as thousands gathered to witness the Suna Besha, a grand ritual featuring the adorned deities of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra, and Devi Subhadra.

On Sunday, the sacred city of Puri witnessed a massive gathering of devotees who came to observe the Suna Besha, a mesmerizing ritual in which the divine siblings, Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra, and Devi Subhadra, were decorated with resplendent gold ornaments while seated on their chariots.

This divine spectacle took place in front of the Singhadwara, the Lion Gate of the Jagannath Temple, where the deities, clad in golden regalia, were perched on their chariots after the Bahuda Yatra, or the return journey of the Rath Yatra. Despite the immense crowd, the event proceeded without any disruptions, maintaining a tranquil and spiritually charged atmosphere.

According to tradition, the deities were adorned with more than 208 kilograms of gold ornaments, including golden limbs, headgear, intricately crafted garlands, a golden chakra (discus), silver conches, and symbolic items like a golden ploughshare and pestle. This opulent ritual, known locally as Suna Besha, is also referred to as Rajarajeswar Besha or Bada Tadhau Besha in the Odia language.

Historical records indicate that the Suna Besha tradition began in 1460 CE during the reign of Gajapati King Kapilendra Deva. Scholars and temple servitors point out that the Tadhau Karan, a special category of temple servitors, played a pivotal role in introducing this practice. The king commissioned the crafting of 138 types of gold ornaments for the deities, some adorned with precious gemstones.

While the exquisite adornment captivated the devotees, the large influx of pilgrims resulted in severe traffic congestion in and around Puri. All designated parking areas reached their capacity, and several key roads leading to the city experienced prolonged gridlocks.

The spiritual celebrations will persist as the deities are set to return to the sanctum sanctorum of the 12th-century Jagannath Temple during the special ritual of Niledri Bije scheduled for Tuesday.

India’s Engineering Advances Global Innovation, Says Piyush Goyal

India is rapidly enhancing its position in global supply chains, driven by significant advancements in engineering and innovation, said Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal.

India’s engineering prowess is positioning the country as a central player in some of the world’s most sophisticated sectors, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal remarked recently. Emphasizing India’s ambitious plans within global supply chains, Goyal described how the country aims to evolve into a globally trusted partner by focusing on design, patenting, and production.

During his visit to the KIADB Aerospace Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in Devanahalli, Karnataka, Goyal applauded the collaborative efforts of Safran Aircraft Engines and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). These partnerships, he noted, are central to India’s growing footprint in the aerospace sector. Goyal also used the visit as an opportunity to engage with industry leaders to gather insights that will inform future policy decisions.

The visit takes place against the backdrop of significant developments in Indo-French aerospace relations. At the 2023 Paris Air Show, HAL and Safran solidified their collaboration by signing an agreement focused on the industrialization and production of rotating parts for LEAP engines. These components are crucial for next-generation aircraft, and the agreement builds on a Memorandum of Understanding signed in October 2023 and a contract for the production of forged parts slated for February 2024.

Safran’s investment in India extends across multiple locations, including Hyderabad, Bengaluru, and Goa, where it operates five manufacturing facilities. The partnership with HAL marks a pivotal moment as the collaboration now extends to forging Inconel parts, further enhancing India’s aerospace manufacturing capabilities.

Dr. D.K. Sunil, Chairman and Managing Director of HAL, expressed pride in deepening the partnership with Safran, which he said would advance India’s expertise in high-performance alloys. This sentiment underscores the strategic importance of the collaborative ventures, which are seen as key drivers of innovation and industrial growth within the aerospace sector.

The continuous expansion of global capability centers in India reflects a broader trend of international companies harnessing India’s engineering talent to drive innovation. As these centers grow, the potential for India to innovate, patent, and produce at a global standard becomes increasingly feasible, further embedding the nation within the global supply chain.

According to IANS, these developments collectively signify a robust commitment to strengthening India’s role in global industries through cutting-edge technology and strategic collaborations.

BRICS Leaders Call for Global Reforms, Condemn Conflicts in Kashmir, Gaza, Iran

Leaders of the BRICS group have condemned recent attacks in Gaza and Iran, urged reforms of international institutions, and positioned the bloc as a bastion for multilateral diplomacy amid ongoing global conflicts and trade tensions.

The BRICS summit, held on July 6 in Rio de Janeiro, brought together leaders from Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and other member countries to address pressing global issues. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva cited the group’s roots in the Non-Aligned Movement, asserting BRICS’ potential to counterbalance a fragmented global order while expressing concerns over rising protectionism.

The BRICS coalition now spans over half of the global population and accounts for 40% of the world’s economic output. Since its inception in 2009 with Brazil, Russia, India, and China, the group has expanded to include South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. This year’s summit marks the first participation of Indonesian leaders.

A notable absence at the summit was Chinese President Xi Jinping, who sent his premier in his place. Russian President Vladimir Putin participated virtually owing to an International Criminal Court arrest warrant. Nevertheless, the event saw the gathering of key leaders, including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, at Rio’s Museum of Modern Art.

More than 30 nations have expressed interest in joining BRICS as full members or partners, signaling its growing influence. The summit emphasized the necessity for global institutional reforms to align with contemporary geopolitical realities. Lula accentuated the need for BRICS to spearhead these reforms by highlighting the need for changes in institutions like the United Nations Security Council and the International Monetary Fund.

In a joint statement, BRICS leaders condemned attacks on Iran’s civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities, labeling them violations of international law. The statement also expressed grave concern for the situation in Gaza and condemned a terrorist attack in Kashmir, underscoring the bloc’s commitment to counter terrorism in all its manifestations.

The leaders stressed the imperative of a unified global response to terrorism, emphasizing that acts of terror should bear no association with religion, nationality, or ethnicity. The statement called for the United Nations to expedite a longstanding Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism and demanded action against all UN-designated terrorists and entities.

On economic matters, the joint statement warned against the impact of increasing tariffs on global trade, taking a subtle stand against the protectionist policies under U.S. President Donald Trump. BRICS supported Ethiopia and Iran’s potential candidacy for the World Trade Organization, advocating for the restoration of its dispute resolution mechanisms.

The summit also highlighted plans to establish a BRICS Multilateral Guarantees initiative under the New Development Bank, aiming to lower financing costs and boost investments in member countries. In discussions centered on artificial intelligence, the leaders stressed the necessity of safeguards against unauthorized AI use, calling for responsible data usage and compensation mechanisms.

In climate action dialogue, Brazil leveraged its role as host of the forthcoming United Nations climate summit to underscore the proactive stance of developing nations. Brazil, China, and the UAE have shown interest in funding the Tropical Forests Forever Facility, dedicated to preserving endangered forests globally.

The BRICS summit reaffirmed the bloc’s intention to act as a powerful voice for the Global South, urging comprehensive international reforms and strengthening multilateral initiatives in the face of global challenges.

Yale Researcher Develops AI Tool to Classify Cancer Cells

Indian-origin researcher Smita Krishnaswamy at Yale University has co-developed an advanced AI tool that differentiates between various cancer cells within a single tumor, potentially revolutionizing cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Indian-origin researcher Smita Krishnaswamy, an associate professor of computer science and genetics at Yale University, has played a pivotal role in developing an innovative artificial intelligence (AI) tool that distinguishes different types of cancer cells within a single tumor. The research findings, published on June 24 in the journal Cancer Discovery, are anticipated to make a significant impact on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

In collaboration with other experts, Krishnaswamy has been instrumental in creating the AI tool named AAnet. This tool is capable of detecting patterns in gene expression at the single-cell level, which allows it to simplify complex cancer data into five distinct cell groups, commonly referred to as ‘archetypes.’

The AAnet tool harnesses the power of artificial intelligence to process intricate genetic data, which is crucial for identifying specific cell types within a tumor. This enhanced ability to differentiate between cancer cell types could lead to more accurate and personalized treatment options for patients. By categorizing cancer cells into defined archetypes, the tool offers a clearer understanding of a tumor’s composition, potentially enabling more targeted therapeutic strategies.

This breakthrough in AI and cancer research could pave the way for new methods of diagnosing cancer at the cellular level, where traditional approaches may fall short. By refining the classification of cancer cells, AAnet provides a foundation for further innovations in both research and medical practice, marking a significant step forward in the fight against cancer.

According to Krishnaswamy, discussing the tool’s capabilities with Yale Engineering, AAnet’s development represents a leap in the capacity to interpret complex genetic information with precision and ease. The tool’s ability to organize and simplify single-cell data signifies a substantial advancement in the exploration of cancer cell dynamics and behavior.

Tesla CFO Taneja Appointed Treasurer of Musk’s Political Party

Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja has been appointed as treasurer of the newly established America Party, founded by Elon Musk in response to recent political developments.

Tesla’s Chief Financial Officer Vaibhav Taneja, originally from India, has been named treasurer of Elon Musk’s America Party, according to documents filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC). This appointment comes as a part of Musk’s political initiative launched in early July following his disagreement with President Donald Trump over the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’.

The FEC filing reveals that the headquarters of the America Party is located at 1 Rocker Road in Hawthorne, California. Taneja’s responsibilities within the party encompass the roles of both treasurer and custodian of records, with his Tesla-affiliated address appearing in the official paperwork, which has since been circulating on social media.

The inception of the America Party was officially announced by Musk shortly after Trump enacted the controversial bill. Reflecting Musk’s proactive approach to political engagement, he posted on the platform X, formerly known as Twitter, stating, “By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.” As of now, Musk remains the party’s sole declared candidate.

In his new role as treasurer, Taneja will be in charge of the party’s financial oversight. His duties involve managing contributions, monitoring expenditures, and ensuring adherence to federal campaign finance regulations. This critical role requires him to maintain meticulous records of all financial transactions and prevent any illicit financial activities.

Vaibhav Taneja assumed the role of CFO at Tesla in August 2023, succeeding Zach Kirkhorn. Taneja possesses extensive expertise in corporate financial management, having joined Tesla in 2017 through its acquisition of SolarCity. Prior to becoming CFO, he served as Tesla’s Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller.

Before his association with Tesla, Taneja had a noteworthy career at PricewaterhouseCoopers spanning nearly 17 years, where he provided consultancy services to major corporations regarding financial strategy and regulatory compliance.

His appointment as treasurer of the America Party highlights his significant experience and trusted position within Musk’s ventures, as he takes on a pivotal role in navigating the financial dimensions of this newly formed political entity.

India’s Economic Equality: Examining the Real Data

Contrary to recent media reports claiming India is one of the most equal countries, a misinterpretation of a World Bank report reveals India’s persistent and worsening inequality.

Recent media narratives suggesting that India ranks as the fourth most equal country globally have been challenged following a deeper analysis of a World Bank report. These claims mistakenly stem from a Press Information Bureau (PIB) release that inaccurately interpreted statistical data, resulting in significant misreporting. Far from being among the most equal, India ranks 176 out of 216 countries in terms of income inequality as of 2019.

The erroneous claim was originally propagated by several major Indian newspapers, including The Hindu, Business Standard, The Times of India, and The Indian Express, which referenced the purported findings of the World Bank. A closer examination reveals the figures that led to this misleading depiction of India’s position.

The Press Information Bureau utilized a figure from the World Bank brief that showed India’s consumption-based Gini index improving from 28.8 in 2011-12 to 25.5 in 2022-23. However, this statistic, reflecting consumption inequality, was improperly compared to countries whose equality is gauged through income inequality measures. This basic statistical error is critical as consumption Gini indices typically appear lower than income ones because wealthier individuals tend to save more, leading to skewed comparisons.

Further compounding the confusion, the World Bank did not make or endorse any such comparative analysis. It highlighted the challenges in obtaining accurate depictions of consumption inequality due to limitations in data, emphasizing that the figures could be underestimated. The methodology of India’s 2022-23 Household Consumption Expenditure Survey differed significantly from the previous survey in 2011-12, raising concerns about data comparability over time.

India’s income Gini index, a more suitable metric for international comparisons, stands at 61 for both 2019 and 2023. According to the World Inequality Database, this figure indicates deepening inequality over decades, marking an increase from an earlier ranking of 115 in 2009. Furthermore, the country’s wealth inequality index soars at 75 in 2023, indicating pronounced disparities.

In alternative measures like per capita calorie intake, an indicator of food consumption inequality, India ranked 102nd out of 185 countries in 2019, down from 82nd in 2009. This decline further underscores India’s increasing inequality across various metrics.

The misrepresentation of India’s inequality status is not just an oversight but a severe distortion of reality, potentially leading to complacency and undermining efforts to address pressing socio-economic issues. The dissemination of inaccurate statistics by trusted media outlets could impede the necessary policy interventions required to tackle inequality effectively.

Ultimately, scrutinizing and accurately interpreting data is essential, especially when discussing social inequality, as it reflects the lived realities of millions. Addressing these disparities is imperative for equitable development, necessitating informed policy decisions based on accurate data analyses.

According to The Wire, the importance of discerning accurate data remains crucial, highlighting the urgent need for vigilant fact-checking to avoid misleading narratives.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Bill Reduces Remittance Tax for Indians to 1%

President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act has advanced in the Senate, featuring a reduced 1% tax on remittances, offering relief to Indian professionals and non-resident Indians (NRIs) in the U.S.

In a significant development for Indian professionals and non-resident Indians (NRIs) in the United States, President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act has managed to surmount a major hurdle in the Senate, now offering a considerably lowered remittance tax of 1%. This development is seen as a substantial relief from the originally proposed 5% tax rate, which had initially drawn widespread concern.

The updated draft of the bill now implements a mere 1% tax on remittances sent via cash, money orders, or cashier’s checks. This marks a substantial reduction from the 5% rate proposed in May, which was later downscaled to 3.5% in the House version of the bill. The reduced tax rate applies to remittance transfers not made through financial institutions or using a debit or credit card issued in the United States.

The initial draft of the bill passed by the House of Representatives in May caused alarm among many Indian professionals due to its high proposed tax, affecting non-U.S. citizens, including those on Green Cards and temporary visas like H-1B and H-2A. Remittances comprise a significant component of India’s foreign income, making the tax rate particularly relevant for Indian nationals residing abroad.

Data from the Migration Policy Institute, as cited by The Times of India, indicated that approximately 2.9 million Indians were living in the U.S. as of 2023, making them the second-largest foreign-born demographic in the country. Additionally, the World Bank reported in 2024 that India was the largest recipient of international remittances, accumulating $129 billion, with 28% of these remittances originating from the U.S.

In light of these statistics, the remittance policy is pivotal for states like Kerala, Uttar Pradesh, and Bihar, where remittances are a crucial financial lifeline for millions of households.

Despite the remittance tax relief, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes contentious elements such as a $150 billion increase in military spending, mass deportation measures, and funding for a border wall. To offset these expenses, the bill proposes substantial cuts to federal programs, including Medicaid and incentives for clean energy, inciting opposition from various political factions, including divisions within the Republican Party itself.

This policy proposal has led to public disagreements, notably between President Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who lashed out at the bill as “utterly insane,” cautioning that it would jeopardize millions of American jobs.

The flag-bearing piece of legislation narrowly passed a Senate vote by 51-49, pushing it forward for further Senate discussions. According to Al Jazeera, President Trump aims to see the bill enacted by Congress before the Fourth of July.

Source: Original article

Americans4Hindus Urges FBI Probe into ISKCON Utah Gunfire Incidents

Americans4Hindus has expressed grave concern over recent gunfire incidents at the ISKCON Temple in Utah, which may be hate crimes targeting the Hindu community in the United States.

Americans4Hindus, an advocacy group, has raised alarms following nighttime gunfire occurrences at the ISKCON Temple in Utah. These incidents, suspected to be targeted attacks, underscore the vulnerability of Hindu places of worship and might be classified as hate crimes against the Hindu minority in the country.

In response to these unsettling events, the organization stands with the ISKCON community and commends the Utah County Sheriff’s Office. The local law enforcement agency has shown agility in dealing with the situation by increasing patrols to safeguard the temple and its worshippers.

Dr. Romesh Japra, the Founder and Chairman of Americans4Hindus, called for a comprehensive federal response. “Given the rising trend of temple vandalism and Hindu hate crimes—including acts of violence—we strongly urge the FBI to launch a thorough and transparent investigation. We call on FBI Director Kash Patel and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to ensure that such heinous incidents receive the appropriate federal attention and action,” he declared.

This call to action is part of the organization’s broader commitment to upholding the civil and religious rights of Hindu Americans, making sure that their sacred spaces are protected and respected nationwide.

The advocacy group has been a vocal supporter of safeguarding minority religious rights, pointing out the crucial need for vigilance and appropriate measures to deter hate crimes.

The original source reporting these concerns is Americans4Hindus, a prominent voice in advocating for Hindu Americans’ rights and interests.

Source: Original article

US, India, Japan, Australia Collaborate on Critical Minerals Supply

The Quad nations have launched the Quad Critical Minerals Initiative to diversify supply chains, addressing concerns over China’s dominance in critical minerals impacting technologies such as electric vehicles, batteries, and semiconductors.

The Quad coalition, comprising the United States, India, Japan, and Australia, has introduced the Quad Critical Minerals Initiative to mitigate concerns regarding China’s influence on the vital supply of critical minerals. These minerals are essential for the manufacturing of modern technologies, including electric vehicles, batteries, and semiconductors.

The initiative was unveiled through a joint statement, emphasizing the need to collaborate on securing and diversifying global supply chains. Although the specifics of the plan were sparse, the underlying purpose is to diminish excessive dependence on China, which currently holds a dominant position in the global reserves of several essential minerals, including a substantial share of the world’s graphite crucial for electric vehicle batteries.

On Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio welcomed the foreign ministers to Washington, marking a strategic shift towards Asia by the new Trump administration, which had previously concentrated on conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East and domestic issues like migration. Rubio highlighted the importance of the new initiative, expressing a desire for tangible progress in diversifying supply chains.

While the joint statement did not explicitly mention China, it underscored shared apprehensions about economic coercion and disruptions in supply chains. “Reliance on any one country for processing and refining critical minerals and derivative goods production exposes our industries to economic coercion, price manipulation, and supply chain disruptions,” the statement declared.

The ministers also conveyed their unease about escalating tensions in Asia, citing “serious concerns regarding dangerous and provocative actions” in the South China Sea and East China Sea that jeopardize regional peace and stability, without directly naming China. The foreign ministers from India and Japan affirmed the Quad’s goal of fostering a “free and open Indo-Pacific,” a diplomatic expression commonly interpreted as countering China’s increasing influence in the area.

Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar stressed the importance of regional autonomy, emphasizing, “It is essential that nations of the Indo-Pacific have the freedom of choice, so essential to make right decisions on development and security.”

In addition to addressing China’s influence, the Quad ministers collectively addressed regional security matters. They condemned a recent deadly attack in Kashmir that primarily affected civilians, calling for the attackers and their supporters to face justice promptly.

The discussions also encompassed North Korea’s missile tests, with the joint statement criticizing Pyongyang’s actions as destabilizing and renewing the commitment to the “complete denuclearization” of North Korea. However, the statement omitted any reference to other global conflicts such as the war in Ukraine and tensions in Iran.

India and Japan’s diplomacy with Russia and Iran, respectively, may have contributed to these omissions. Notably, India maintains a historical relationship with Russia despite its invasion of Ukraine, while Japan continues diplomatic relations with Iran.

This meeting reflects a nuanced trajectory in U.S. foreign policy. Although initial expectations suggested the Trump administration might confront China more aggressively, President Trump has adopted a more measured approach, speaking respectfully about Chinese leader Xi Jinping and easing broader trade tensions between the two nations.

Nonetheless, the establishment of the Quad Critical Minerals Initiative signifies the beginning of strategic efforts to reduce reliance on China. President Trump is anticipated to visit India later this year for a Quad summit, where future alliance actions might be disclosed.

Source: Original article

Banks and Telecom Surpass Tech in H-1B Visa Hiring

Major banks and telecommunications companies have surpassed technology giants as the leading recruiters of H-1B visa workers in recent years, reshaping the landscape of foreign talent employment in the United States.

From May 2020 to May 2024, significant players such as Citigroup, AT&T, and Capital One have emerged as top recruiters of foreign labor through staffing and outsourcing agencies, according to data analyzed by Bloomberg. This trend marks a notable shift from previous years, where technology firms in Silicon Valley dominated H-1B visa hiring.

The H-1B visa is crucial for U.S. companies requiring individuals for specialty occupations demanding theoretical or technical expertise. Fields actively engaging H-1B workers include information technology, engineering, finance, and healthcare.

Applicants must possess a job offer from a U.S. employer and hold at least a bachelor’s degree or its equivalent in their field to qualify for the visa. The initial grant is for up to three years and can be extended to a maximum of six. Each fiscal year, the U.S. government issues 65,000 H-1B visas with an additional 20,000 allotted to applicants with a U.S. master’s degree or higher.

The perpetual high demand for these visas has necessitated a lottery system. Employers are required to submit a Labor Condition Application to ensure fair wages and working conditions for their H-1B employees. This program remains critical for enabling U.S. businesses to leverage global talent and address skill shortages.

India has consistently emerged as a leading source of H-1B applicants. The country accounts for roughly 70–75% of all petitions due to its robust tech industry and close ties with U.S. technology firms. China follows as the second-largest contributor, contributing about 11–13% of applications. Other countries like Canada, South Korea, and the Philippines each represent under 1% of the total.

The global workforce distribution, particularly in IT, engineering, and healthcare, highlights how U.S. companies rely heavily on skilled professionals from these countries to meet their labor demands.

Bloomberg’s report reveals that Citigroup Inc. added over 3,000 new H-1B workers during this four-year span—surpassing prominent tech companies like Nvidia, Oracle, and Qualcomm. However, most of these hires are not direct employees but rather contractors through third-party firms. A significant portion came via outsourcing companies like Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (TCS), which is currently under investigation by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for possible discrimination against non-Indian workers.

In response to these allegations, a spokesperson for TCS stated, “Allegations that TCS engages in unlawful discrimination are meritless and misleading. TCS has a strong track record of being an equal opportunity employer in the US, embracing the highest levels of integrity and values in our operations.”

Citigroup also addressed questions about their hiring approach, saying, “We supplement our 71,000 US workers with highly skilled H-1B visa holders to address specific, timely needs. When we do so, we follow relevant laws and regulations, including anti-discrimination laws.”

Bloomberg’s analysis suggests that H-1B contractors receive significantly lower compensation than their direct counterparts. While software developers through staffing agencies reported median earnings of $94,000, those directly employed earned $142,000, even while factoring in job title, education, and experience.

The disparity in wages has drawn criticism concerning the program’s aim to recruit the highest caliber of professionals. “If the whole purpose of this program is to hire the best of the best, then why aren’t we seeing higher wages?” remarked Susan Houseman of the W.E. Upjohn Institute, after examining the findings.

Despite this critique, proponents of the H-1B program argue it addresses critical skill shortages in the U.S. workforce by bringing in unique expertise that complements the existing labor pool and maintains company competitiveness globally. They further assert that there are built-in protections to guard against wage abuse, though acknowledging that enforcement poses challenges.

The redirection of H-1B workers from tech to telecom and banking indicates that skilled foreign professionals are increasingly finding career opportunities outside of traditional technology firms.

According to Bloomberg.

Source: Original article

SIM Cards Replaced by New Mobile Technology System

The telecommunications industry in Spain is on the cusp of a significant shift as it moves towards adopting eSIM technology, marking the beginning of the end for traditional SIM cards.

The telecommunications landscape is undergoing rapid evolution, and Spain is poised to bid farewell to the SIM cards that have powered mobile devices since their inception. The future of mobile connectivity lies in the technological innovation that eSIM brings. Historically, mobile phones have relied on a physical card as an essential component of the GSM network. Nonetheless, telecom companies in Spain are now facilitating the transition from conventional SIM cards to the new eSIM technology.

The SIM card, standing for Subscriber Identity Module, is a physical card that contains identification data utilized in mobile phones. Introduced in July 1991, it became a necessary element of the GSM network, ensuring that a phone could connect to a teleoperator network, and helping to identify the user’s phone line and contractual details. While phone numbers still function as the main identification linked to contracts, the once mandatory method of network operation is nearing obsolescence.

The advent of eSIM technology represents a paradigm shift from traditional physical SIM cards to digital versions. Without the need for a physical card, eSIM can be activated remotely via a QR code or operator application, offering several advantages:

Firstly, eSIMs can store multiple profiles from different operators on a single device, allowing users to effortlessly switch between lines or data plans. This is particularly advantageous for travelers, as it enables them to activate local data plans without swapping out cards. Additionally, eSIMs enhance security by eliminating the risk of theft or loss associated with physical SIMs. They are also compatible with nearly all devices currently available in the market.

Activating an eSIM is often straightforward and cost-free for consumers. Customers typically initiate the process through their operator’s app, by phone, or at physical stores. Despite this, some services, such as MultiSIM, which allows a main line to be used across multiple devices simultaneously, incur an additional charge. In Spain, companies like Movistar offer eSIM activation for free, while others, such as Orange or Vodafone, charge between €5 and €10.

eSIM technology offers significant benefits not only to consumers but also to businesses. The ability to connect multiple devices with a single line could streamline operations substantially for telecommunications firms. Moreover, the capability to maintain different numbers across countries presents a competitive edge, particularly for frequent travelers. The physical removal of the SIM card translates to cost reductions as well.

Currently, eSIM activation is available to any customer across carriers, with the caveat that the device in use must support it. While physical SIM cards remain in use, their popularity is waning as digital alternatives garner favor. In the greater context of technological advancement and connectivity, eSIMs are paving the way for more accessible, efficient, and global communication.

Source: Original article

Trump Employs Madman Theory to Influence Global Politics

President Donald Trump’s unpredictable approach to foreign policy has become a hallmark of his administration, with implications for international relations and alliances.

In a recent statement, President Donald Trump indicated the possibility of military action against Iran, saying, “I may do it. I may not do it. Nobody knows what I’m going to do.” This remark underscores a notable aspect of Trump’s presidency: his unpredictability, which he has leveraged as a strategic asset.

The unpredictability approach, often referred to as the Madman Theory, seeks to portray a leader as capable of any action to extract concessions. As Trump has embraced this strategy, it has significantly impacted global politics and U.S. foreign relations.

The concentration of policy-making within Trump’s administration has been compared to that of former President Richard Nixon, according to Peter Trubowitz, a professor of international relations at the London School of Economics. “Trump’s character, preferences, and temperament make policy decisions more reliant on him,” Trubowitz explains, reflecting how the President’s personal traits shape policy outcomes.

This strategy has spanned Trump’s dealings with both allies and adversaries. For instance, Trump initially cozied up to Russian President Vladimir Putin while taking a more confrontational stance toward traditional allies. He has made provocative statements about Canada and suggested using military force against Greenland, altering the dynamics of trans-Atlantic alliances.

The implications of Trump’s approach have been profound. In Munich, Vice-President JD Vance declared that the U.S. would no longer guarantee European security—a stance that challenged decades-long commitments established through NATO. Former British Defence Secretary Ben Wallace has voiced skepticism about the future of these alliances, and Trump’s choices have raised fundamental questions about the credibility of America’s international commitments.

Leaked communications from Trump’s administration highlight the disdain for European allies, with U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth disparagingly referring to them as “freeloaders.” These attitudes have manifested in shifts in security dynamics, prompting countries to reevaluate their strategic relationships with the U.S.

Notably, Trump’s tactics have yielded some results. Recently, Britain’s Sir Keir Starmer announced an increase in defense spending, followed by similar commitments from other NATO members, reflecting a response to the pressure exerted by Trump’s unpredictability.

The unpredictable approach is not entirely new. President Nixon employed a similar tactic during the Vietnam War. He instructed his National Security Adviser, Henry Kissinger, to convey a sense of unpredictability to the North Vietnamese, hinting it would be wise to reach an agreement before matters escalated further. This is reminiscent of how Trump’s foreign policy is being perceived today.

Whether this strategy will continue to be effective, especially against adversaries, remains a subject of debate. Critics argue that instead of keeping opponents guessing, Trump’s unpredictability could make his actions more predictable as they are rooted in identifiable character traits.

The ongoing impact of Trump’s foreign policy doctrine on global alliances and world order remains significant and continues to evolve. As international relationships are subjected to sudden changes, the global community must constantly adapt to an unprecedented diplomatic environment.

Source: Original article

Texas Floods Kill Dozens; 21 Children Among Victims

Flash floods in Texas have resulted in the deaths of at least 68 people across five counties, and officials warn the toll may continue to rise.

The devastating flash floods sweeping through Texas have claimed the lives of at least 68 people, with the possibility of more casualties as rescue operations continue. Five counties across the state have been severely impacted.

Kerr County has reported the highest number of fatalities with 59 confirmed deaths. According to Sheriff Larry Leitha, among the deceased are 38 adults and 21 children, illustrating the wide-reaching impact of the natural disaster.

In Travis County, local authorities confirmed four deaths. County Judge Andy Brown shared this update as emergency services continue their efforts to locate and assist those still unaccounted for.

Burnet County also experienced tragic losses, with two people confirmed dead. This information was verified by the county’s emergency management coordinator.

Similarly, Kendall County officials reported two fatalities. The county’s local officials issued a statement confirming these deaths while highlighting ongoing search and rescue operations.

Elsewhere, Tom Green County has reported one death, which was confirmed by the San Angelo Police Department. These figures contribute to the overall death toll as communities grapple with the aftermath of the floods.

The situation remains dynamic as rescue crews work tirelessly to find the missing and support affected residents throughout Texas. Officials warn that as rescue teams reach more remote areas, the death toll is likely to rise further.

This report is based on updates provided by regional authorities, highlighting the collaborative efforts in managing the crisis, according to BBC News.

Source: Original article

Thousands Gather for Dalai Lama’s 90th Birthday Celebration

Thousands of Tibetan Buddhists flocked to Dharamshala, India, on Sunday, braving torrential monsoon rains to           celebrate the 90th birthday of the Dalai Lama.

The celebrations were undeterred by the adverse weather as the revered Tibetan spiritual leader made an appearance in traditional attire, assisted by two monks, and greeted the assemblage with a smile. Echoes of chants filled the hilltop temples, and dance troupes performed energetically with clashing cymbals and bagpipes.

Among the attendees were Indian officials, long-time followers, and Hollywood actor Richard Gere, who has been a devoted admirer of the exiled leader, who is respected worldwide as a proponent of peace. Gere expressed his joy, declaring it was a “joyous, joyous day” to celebrate the “extraordinary life” of the Dalai Lama. He described the Dalai Lama as a person who “totally embodies selflessness” before embracing him and kissing his hand.

Sunday’s event marked the conclusion of a week of long-life prayers, beginning in accordance with the Dalai Lama’s birthday on the Tibetan lunar calendar. During a ceremony on Saturday, the Dalai Lama reassured his followers of his “great physical condition” and predicted his longevity extending to 130 years, surpassing his previous estimate by two decades.

Though the Dalai Lama stated he typically avoided birthday celebrations, he thanked his followers for using the occasion to meditate on peace of mind and compassion. Calling himself a “simple Buddhist monk,” he looked back on his 90 years without regret.

In his birthday message, he emphasized, “While it is important to work for material development, it is vital to focus on achieving peace of mind through cultivating a good heart and by being compassionate, not just toward near and dear ones, but toward everyone.”

This week, he also confirmed plans for his succession, dispelling long-standing speculation about the continuation of the 600-year-old institution. According to Tibetan Buddhist tradition, the Dalai Lama reincarnates after death, a process grounded in spiritual customs rather than political mandates.

Having lived in exile since fleeing Chinese control in 1959, the Dalai Lama previously declared that his reincarnation would occur in the “free world,” outside of China. However, Beijing dismissed his authority over naming a successor, insisting that any succession must comply with Chinese laws and be sanctioned by the government in Beijing.

This announcement has reignited concerns among exiled Tibetans that China might attempt to designate a successor to further consolidate its control over Tibet, a region it has governed since an occupation in 1950.

Throughout his life, the Dalai Lama has been a guiding light for the Tibetan diaspora in their pursuit of autonomy and resistance to Chinese authority.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi extended his birthday wishes, lauding the Dalai Lama as an “enduring symbol of love, compassion, patience and moral discipline.” Former U.S. President Barack Obama also sent greetings, calling him “the youngest 90-year-old I know” and expressing appreciation for their friendship.

Source: Original article

Karisma Kapoor Interested in Malayalam Cinema Collaboration

Bollywood actress Karisma Kapoor has voiced her admiration for the Malayalam film industry, expressing a desire to be part of its storytelling legacy.

During a visit to Kerala in 2024 for an inauguration event, Bollywood luminary Karisma Kapoor shared her deep appreciation for the Malayalam film industry. Known for its rich storytelling and exceptional talent, the Malayalam cinema has captivated audiences, and Kapoor is no exception in her admiration.

Speaking to the press, Kapoor remarked on the remarkable talent and brilliant scripts the regional industry produces, citing her hope to one day work in a South Indian film. Despite her successful Bollywood career, she expressed a wistful longing to explore Malayalam cinema.

“I have come to Kerala before. I’ve done some shooting here many years ago,” Kapoor said warmly, addressing the local press at the event. “Malayalam cinema is absolutely fantastic. There’s such great talent here, and the scripts are brilliant. I never had the opportunity to work in a South Indian film… but maybe someday. I’d love to be a part of it.”

Karisma further emphasized her admiration for the industry, highlighting the incredible abundance of talent, saying, “There’s so much talent out here, which is amazing. We love to see all our cinemas converge together.”

The actress’s praise extended to Malayalam legends Mammootty and Mohanlal, whom she acknowledged with great respect and admiration. “Kya bole… Itni great legends hain woh. God bless everyone — such great talent,” she expressed, leaving no doubt about her genuine admiration for these iconic figures in Malayalam cinema.

Her enthusiastic words reflect a broader appreciation for the collaborative and innovatively creative space that regional cinema like Malayalam offers to artists and audiences alike.

Source: Original article

Google CEO Sundar Pichai’s Daily Routine and Productivity Tips

Google CEO Sundar Pichai maintains a balanced daily routine that emphasizes simplicity, family time, and productive leadership to steer one of the world’s leading technology companies.

Sundar Pichai, the 53-year-old CEO of Google and Alphabet, manages his demanding role by adhering to a surprisingly straightforward daily routine. Pichai, born on June 10, 1972, is an Indian-American executive leading one of the world’s largest tech conglomerates. Despite the pressures associated with his position, he fosters an environment focused on efficiency and calm leadership.

Pichai tackles the day with a slow start, prioritizing a balanced and mindful morning. He wakes up between 6:30 a.m. and 7:00 a.m., enjoying a good night’s sleep before engaging with the world. Rather than diving into emails or meetings immediately, Pichai begins his day with a simple breakfast of tea, toast, and eggs while catching up on headlines from The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times, opting for the tactile nature of physical newspapers.

Even as he helms both Google and Alphabet, Pichai’s work schedule remains structured yet intense. His workday typically runs from 8:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. or later, often extending to 10–12 hours filled with critical meetings, decision-making processes, and strategic planning for major projects involving AI, search, and cloud innovations. Yet, he emphasizes productivity over lengthy hours, often citing the importance of work-life balance in leadership.

A hallmark of Pichai’s leadership is his composed and thoughtful style. He strategically avoids engaging with his phone first thing in the morning, thus setting a tranquil tone that resonates throughout his day. Pichai makes decisions carefully, delegates duties effectively, and avoids micromanaging, cultivating an innovative and low-pressure working atmosphere at Google where open discussions and teamwork are encouraged.

Balancing his intensive professional life, Pichai remains dedicated to his family and personal interests. Living in California with his wife, Anjali, and their two children, he allocates evenings to family dinners and catching up on their daily activities. He is an avid sports enthusiast, with particular interests in cricket and tennis, following the games passionately. Not just a tech leader, Pichai often experiments with new gadgets and stays attuned to technological advances.

Pichai, an advocate for lifelong learning, frequently indulges in books covering biographies, business, and technology. His approach to diet is similarly understated; meals are healthy and simple, featuring a blend of vegetables, grains, and proteins. He favors home-cooked Indian dishes for dinner and maintains hydration throughout the day to fend off fatigue.

As his day winds down, Pichai enjoys unwinding with sports or TV shows and typically goes to bed between 10:30 p.m. and 11:00 p.m., ensuring ample rest for the coming day.

Pichai’s philosophy is captured in his belief that success derives from a deliberate, composed approach rather than the high stress synonymous with executive roles. His routine underscores a dedication to personal health, family time, and clear, visionary leadership. Such practices highlight that effective leadership and sustained success often stem from balanced, thoughtful living.

“The right moral compass is trying hard to think about what customers want,” Pichai has said, encapsulating his customer-centric philosophy, which guides his leadership strategy.

According to CEO Today Magazine, despite his noteworthy achievements, Pichai’s estimated net worth is around $700 million as of 2025, substantially accumulated through stock options and compensation from Alphabet. His annual salary is $2 million, but inclusive earnings from stock grants and bonuses can soar past $200 million in high-performing years. His wife, Anjali, an Indian from Kota, Rajasthan, also shares their educational background at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur, where they met.

Sundar Pichai possesses impressive academic credentials, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Metallurgical Engineering from IIT Kharagpur, a Master’s in Material Sciences and Engineering from Stanford University, and an MBA from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.

US Dollar’s Poor Start: Impact on Consumers and Economy

The U.S. dollar is experiencing its worst start to the year in over 50 years, raising concerns about inflation, increasing prices for consumers, and impacting international travel.

The U.S. dollar is facing its most challenging start in more than five decades, with substantial ramifications for the economy and consumers. This year, the dollar has lost over 10% of its value against a basket of foreign currencies that are integral to U.S. trade relationships.

This decline is largely attributed to growing investor anxiety over the potential for inflation to devalue the currency. Contributory factors include a major spending bill passed by Congress, which could exacerbate the longstanding issue of U.S. debt, as well as President Donald Trump’s unpredictable trade policies and criticism of the Federal Reserve. These elements have collectively cast doubt on the stability of the U.S. economy and diminished the dollar’s reputation as a “safe haven” asset, analysts told ABC News.

The fundamentals of currency value, such as supply and demand, have turned against the U.S. dollar. Historically, the dollar has been resilient due to consistent demand rooted in the perceived strength and stability of the U.S. economy. During times of global economic or political instability, investors typically view the U.S. dollar as a secure asset, leading to increased demand. However, recent concerns about inflation and economic policy are driving this downward trend.

The inflation concerns, partly fueled by Trump’s tariff policies, suggest that importers might pass on increased costs to consumers, resulting in higher prices. Additionally, as U.S. debt continues to grow, the Treasury might issue bonds, which could contribute to inflation. If inflation erodes the value of U.S. Treasuries, central banks and investors may shift their assets away from U.S. holdings towards alternatives like gold or foreign currencies, noted Paolo Pasquariello, a finance professor at the University of Michigan.

As the dollar weakens, consumers are likely to face higher prices for imported goods. Importers would need to raise their prices because each dollar holds less purchasing power, explained Richard Michelfelder, a professor at Rutgers University. This situation could drive up the cost of everyday items, especially those purchased online from overseas.

Similarly, the depreciation of the dollar makes U.S. travel abroad more expensive. With decreased exchange rates, travelers will find their expenses increase as their dollars convert into fewer foreign currency units.

Despite the challenges, a weaker dollar does present some advantages. Lower relative costs for U.S. goods on international markets could boost exports as American products become more competitively priced for foreign buyers. This boost could positively impact employment in sectors such as automotive manufacturing and advanced technology.

Furthermore, the stronger foreign currencies relative to the dollar could attract more international tourists to the U.S., benefiting the hospitality sector and related industries.

While the U.S. dollar’s decline raises complex economic challenges, it also offers potential benefits across various sectors of the economy, according to ABC News.

US Visa Waiver 2025: Updated Eligible Countries List

The United States’ Visa Waiver Program (VWP) allows citizens from select countries to visit without applying for a traditional visa, simplifying travel for millions.

The United States remains a popular destination for international tourists, offering vibrant cities, diverse cultures, and numerous exploration opportunities. While the visa process can be challenging, the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) provides a simplified travel method for eligible travelers from certain countries, permitting entry without the need for a traditional visa.

The VWP is a travel agreement that lets citizens from participating countries enter the U.S. for up to 90 days for purposes such as tourism, business meetings, or brief transits. However, it does not cover activities like work, study, or extended stays beyond the 90-day limit. Instead of attending visa interviews and completing extensive paperwork, travelers need only apply for travel authorization through the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), an easy-to-use online approval system.

As of 2025, the VWP includes 43 countries, with Qatar and Romania being the newest additions in 2024 and 2025, respectively. The list mainly features European nations, as well as other countries like Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Australia, and New Zealand. To participate, travelers must be citizens of one of these countries and fulfill the entry conditions.

Before booking a flight to the U.S., travelers must meet several eligibility requirements: possessing a biometric e-passport with a chip containing personal data, valid for at least six months beyond their planned departure; obtaining an approved ESTA, which costs $21 and typically receives swift approval; having a round-trip or onward ticket demonstrating intent to exit the U.S. within the 90-day period; and having no criminal record or prior visa overstays, as these factors may lead to disqualification.

Traveling under the VWP involves a straightforward process. First, ensure your e-passport is valid for your entire stay. Then, apply for ESTA by visiting esta.cbp.dhs.gov, completing the application, paying the fee, and saving the confirmation. Next, book a flight with a participating airline, as most major carriers are part of the program. Upon arrival in the U.S., a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer will check your documents. If all is in order, you can enjoy up to 90 days of travel within the country.

To avoid any issues during the trip, travelers should steer clear of some common mistakes such as using ESTA for purposes not permitted under the VWP, overstaying the 90-day limit, failing to renew an expired ESTA, or traveling without an e-passport. Violating these rules can result in denied entry or future travel restrictions.

The Visa Waiver Program is vital for making travel to the U.S. more accessible and faster for millions of people. It promotes tourism, fosters global business connections, and reduces administrative burdens for travelers and immigration officers alike. For those eligible, the VWP offers an efficient and cost-effective route to explore the United States without the need for visa interviews or lengthy processing times.

As long as travelers adhere to the program’s rules, have a valid e-passport, and secure their ESTA authorization beforehand, the Visa Waiver Program remains a convenient option to experience the U.S. without the usual red tape.

Catholic Church Opposes MAGA-Backed Bill, Calls It a Moral Failure

The proposed legislation allocates billions toward aggressive immigration enforcement and cuts vital health and food assistance programs, drawing widespread condemnation from faith leaders across the United States.

A controversial legislative proposal is drawing significant criticism from religious leaders nationwide due to its heavy investment in aggressive immigration enforcement and proposed cuts to healthcare and food assistance. Faith leaders are voicing concerns over the ethical implications and potential social consequences of such a move.

The bill primarily focuses on allocating over $150 billion towards enforcing border policies and bolstering immigration crackdowns. This includes a dramatic increase in the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention budget, set to grow from $3.4 billion to $45 billion by 2029. Professor Donald Moynihan of the University of Michigan highlighted that the ICE budget would surpass the combined funding for all 50 federal prisons.

Critics argue that this immense funding could create a self-perpetuating deportation infrastructure, drawing parallels to the private prison system and military complex. As with military spending, increased funding could incentivize further crackdowns and family separations, leading to a cycle of enforcement.

The legislation also targets faith communities by removing places of worship from the Department of Homeland Security’s sensitive locations list, making it easier for ICE agents to conduct enforcement actions there. Consequently, many religious communities have reported declines in attendance, as the threat of enforcement deters families from practicing their faith.

Prominent Catholics, including Cardinal Robert McElroy and Bishop Jaime Soto, alongside leaders from Episcopalian, Jewish, Lutheran, Presbyterian, and Muslim communities, have signed a letter opposing the bill. They argue that the legislation’s focus on a border wall could drive migrants into remote regions, increasing the risk of deaths, harming the local environment, and forcing asylum-seekers to rely on human smugglers.

Religious leaders advocate for creating legal migration avenues and a legalization program for immigrants who have long contributed to the U.S. economy. They assert these alternatives would better serve immigrants and the nation than a mass deportation campaign.

The bill also proposes severe cuts to healthcare and food assistance, including slashing nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid. This reduction could jeopardize countless lives, leading to increased poverty, bankruptcies, and closures of vital healthcare facilities. Additionally, the bill aims to cut approximately $186 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by 2034, raising concerns about food insecurity for millions.

According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the legislation would exacerbate income inequality by transferring wealth from the nation’s poorest citizens to the wealthiest. This aspect particularly troubles faith leaders, who emphasize the moral obligation to support the most vulnerable.

Archbishop Timothy P. Broglio, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, criticized the bill for offering tax breaks to some while undermining social safety nets through significant cuts to nutrition assistance and Medicaid. He noted the bill’s failure to protect families and children by exclusively focusing on enforcement rather than preserving access to legal protections.

Faith leaders argue the bill’s approach is a moral failure, urging lawmakers to find a better path forward. They call on senators to reconsider the provisions, emphasizing the need to protect human dignity and uphold the common good.

NRIs Can Avoid New US Remittance Tax by Paying Differently

The U.S. Senate has significantly lowered the proposed remittance tax from 5% to 1%, with exemptions for transfers made through specific banking methods, easing concerns for Indian expatriates.

Indian diaspora communities are expressing relief following an important development in the ongoing debate over the U.S. remittance tax. The latest iteration of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” introduces a significant reduction of the initially proposed 5% remittance tax down to 1%, effective January 1, 2026. More crucially, the bill exempts remittances sent via bank accounts, Automated Clearing House (ACH) transfers, and U.S.-issued debit or credit cards from this tax. These provisions make such channels the optimal means for sending money home without additional costs.

The proposed levy has been a topic of considerable discussion among non-resident Indians (NRIs) and Indian expatriates, especially after a tweet on X (formerly known as Twitter) emphasized an important clarification: remittances will not incur the tax if paid via ACH transfer or debit card, methods commonly used by Indians.

A remittance tax is a levy imposed by a government on the transfer of money by individuals from one country to another. In this context, the U.S. remittance tax targets non-citizens, including Indian NRIs, green card holders, and foreign students, sending funds abroad.

Initially proposed at a 5% rate, the tax underwent several revisions, being first reduced to 3.5% by the U.S. House of Representatives and eventually capped at 1% by the Senate. This tax is intended to help fund domestic priorities and reinforce immigration policies. Remittance service providers, such as banks and money transfer operators like Western Union, will collect the tax and transfer the funds to the U.S. Treasury quarterly. The tax applies regardless of the remittance amount.

One of the key components of the revised bill is the exemption granted for remittances made through ACH transfers, debit cards, credit cards, and verified U.S. bank accounts. These common payment channels, often used by NRIs to send money to India, will not be subject to the 1% tax, providing significant financial relief. This shift promotes the use of formal banking methods and lessens the financial load of conventional transfers covering family support, education fees, and investments.

India stands as the largest recipient of remittances worldwide, receiving approximately $33 billion from the U.S. during the fiscal year 2024. This marks almost 28% of India’s total remittance inflow. Without the revised tax provisions, Indian families relying on these funds could have faced substantial financial strain.

This development highlights the importance of strategic financial policy, balancing the need for revenue generation with the impacts on migrant communities and their contributions to home countries. According to Financial Express, the exemptions are set to foster continued use of banking channels by NRIs, thus sustaining essential economic support for families and communities in India.

Middle Eastern Airlines Compete for U.S. Routes

Emirates, Etihad, and Qatar Airways continue to compete fiercely for dominance in the United States market, each bringing unique strengths as they vie for passenger attention.

When it comes to full-service carriers in the Middle East, three names lead the pack: Emirates, Etihad, and Qatar Airways. Operating out of Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Doha respectively, these airlines have leveraged their strategic geographic locations to build vast global networks. This positioning enables them to serve as pivotal connectors between Europe, Africa, Asia, and Oceania.

The challenge, however, lies in serving the Americas, particularly the United States, which is geographically distant from these airlines’ home bases. Nonetheless, the U.S. remains a highly sought-after market, and each carrier is doing its utmost to gain a significant share of it. But which one currently leads the pack?

Based on July 2025 data from Cirium, an aviation data analytics company, Emirates leads in terms of destinations, flights, seat availability, and Available Seat Miles (ASMs) in the U.S. market. Emirates operates out of 12 U.S. airports and plans to run 455 flights in July, offering 184,909 seats and more than 1.2 billion ASMs. This extensive coverage is supported by an impressive fleet of Boeing 777s and Airbus A380s.

Onboard, the Emirates experience is noted for its superior inflight entertainment systems and ample legroom. The flagship Airbus A380, featuring an onboard bar and showers in first class, will serve five U.S. airports, while the Boeing 777, though lacking these luxury amenities, will cover the rest.

Qatar Airways, a member of the oneworld alliance, might not have as vast a network in the U.S. as Emirates, but it maintains a strong presence. It serves 11 airports—just one less than Emirates—and has a slightly higher flight count of 465 for July. The airline utilizes a mix of aircraft, including the 777-300ER and both the A350-900 and A350-1000, which contributes to a lower seat count of 153,512 and just over 1.1 billion ASMs.

Qatar’s strength lies in its QSuite business class, often ranked as the world’s best, although last-minute aircraft swaps can occasionally lead to disappointment if the expected aircraft is replaced by one without these premium features.

Etihad Airways presents a different story. The airline has downsized to become more of a large boutique airline, opting for profitability over expansive reach. In the U.S., Etihad currently offers limited services to key destinations, including Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, and New York-JFK. Future routes are already in the pipeline, such as a promised four-times-a-week service to Charlotte.

Etihad predominantly employs the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner for its U.S. routes, supplemented by the Airbus A350-1000. While its market presence is smaller, the airline focuses on offering an exclusive experience with direct aisle access across its business class cabins.

Premium economy options are exclusively available through Emirates, which is gradually rolling out this service across its fleet. In the economy class, all three carriers maintain high standards with spacious seating and superior inflight entertainment.

Notably, Turkish Airlines is also setting foot in the race, often grouped with these giants despite a more Europe-centric network. With connections to 14 U.S. airports, Turkish Airlines positions Istanbul as a central hub for transcontinental travel leveraging the Boeing 777-300ER, Airbus A350-900, and Boeing 787-9.

In the final analysis, determining which airline truly “wins” depends on the metrics one considers most important. Emirates emerges as the leader in terms of scale and network reach, while Qatar excels in quality with its premium QSuite product. Etihad finds success in financial recovery through a more focused strategy. Ultimately, for travelers in North America, the competition among these airlines results in improved services and competitive fares, making the real winner the consumer, according to Simple Flying.

Harvard Study: Chores Linked to Children’s Success and Happiness

Giving children household chores as part of a team effort can cultivate their long-term success and happiness, a renowned Harvard study suggests.

In today’s fast-paced world, parents often juggle the challenges of raising happy and successful kids with those of building successful careers. However, a groundbreaking Harvard study spanning 86 years provides a straightforward strategy: involve children in household chores.

The research evaluated the backgrounds of over 700 high achievers and discovered a strong connection between those who did chores as children and later professional success. Although the specific chores were not as crucial, the study emphasized integrating chores into a framework that fosters teamwork, responsibility, and shared purpose.

Rather than viewing chores as isolated tasks, the key is to make them part of a larger collaborative effort. For instance, children should understand that bringing their dishes to the sink after meals contributes to the collective task of cleaning up together. This approach helps children perceive their role in a shared responsibility, enhancing their sense of belonging to a communal effort.

Integrating chores into family life this way can help children develop a greater sense of self-worth and empathy. By being involved in household chores, kids are likely to become less self-centered, improve their work ethic, and develop perseverance—traits that are pivotal for future success.

A study published in the Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics supports these findings, stating that children who start small tasks at an early age, around four or five, gain higher levels of self-confidence and self-efficacy. The praise and acknowledgment they receive for their accomplishments boost their motivation and contribute to a growth mindset. Understanding that intelligence and ability can be developed through effort encourages persistence and resilience.

Researchers noted that children who frequently performed chores exhibited better prosocial behavior, academic abilities, peer relationships, and overall life satisfaction. These effects were independent of family income, parental education, or gender, highlighting the universal benefits of chore-related responsibilities.

The key takeaway is to involve children in chores as part of a collective family task. For example, asking a child to clear the table while a parent washes dishes fosters teamwork and shared responsibility. Such practices prepare children to work well with others and handle future challenges effectively.

Ultimately, incorporating chores into a broader group effort lays a solid foundation for long-term success and happiness, proving that no worthwhile task is ever completed alone.

Study Links Coffee Drinking Habits to Longevity

Drinking coffee black or with minimal sweeteners may contribute to a longer lifespan, according to a recent study.

Does your morning coffee come with cream and sugar, or do you prefer it black? A new study suggests that your choice could have implications for your longevity. According to research led by Tufts University, taking your coffee black or with minimal additives may be linked to a longer life.

The study found that coffee drinkers generally tend to outlive non-coffee drinkers, but this potential benefit is most pronounced when the coffee is consumed black or with minimal sugar and saturated fats. If you prefer your coffee with significant amounts of sugar or full-cream milk, the benefits might be negated.

Bingjie Zhou, an epidemiologist from Tufts University, explained that this research breaks new ground by focusing specifically on the impact of additives on the relationship between coffee consumption and mortality risk. “Few studies have examined how coffee additives could impact the link between coffee consumption and mortality risk, and our study is among the first to quantify how much sweetener and saturated fat are being added,” Zhou said.

The findings are consistent with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which recommend limiting added sugar and saturated fat. Over the course of 9 to 11 years, data was collected from 46,332 U.S. adults aged 20 or older, documented during government health surveys. During that time, 7,074 participants died, and these statistics were then analyzed in conjunction with their coffee consumption habits.

The research identified that coffee consumers had a noticeably lower risk of dying from any cause compared to non-drinkers. However, this statistic held true primarily for those who consumed little to no sugar and saturated fat with their coffee. Specifically, drinking black coffee or coffee with very low sugar and fat content could reduce the risk of earlier death by 14% compared to individuals who abstained from coffee altogether.

Ideally, consuming between two to three cups of coffee per day is suggested for these health benefits. While researchers accounted for various factors that could influence mortality rates, such as exercise habits, alcohol consumption, age, gender, and education level, the study does not establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

There might still be undiscovered variables that affect both coffee consumption and overall mortality, yet the study provides strong evidence and aligns with previous research on the health benefits of coffee. While the caffeine content in coffee plays a role in its health benefits, the study suggests that the addition of sugar and saturated fat could weaken these positive effects. Notably, decaffeinated coffee drinkers did not experience the same reduction in mortality risk.

“The health benefits of coffee might be attributable to its bioactive compounds, but our results suggest that the addition of sugar and saturated fat may reduce the mortality benefits,” noted Fang Fang Zhang from Tufts University.

Wimbledon Eliminates Line Judges After 148 Years

The All England Lawn Tennis Club has decided to replace human line judges with an electronic calling system at Wimbledon, ending a long-standing tradition.

The historic lawns of Wimbledon have witnessed a significant transition as organizers adopt an electronic calling system, phasing out the use of human line judges. The change marks a poignant shift for the tournament, which has been synonymous with the presence of these officials clad in distinctive Ralph Lauren uniforms.

Pauline Eyre, a former line judge at Wimbledon, nostalgically recalls stepping onto the grass courts for the first time at age 21, not as a player, but as an official. Despite describing herself as a “pretty bad junior player” who never advanced far in local tournaments, Eyre achieved her career’s peak as a line judge at Wimbledon. However, this chapter closes as technology steps in to take over these duties.

“At the end of the day, a tennis match is sport, and sport is about people,” Eyre told CNN Sports. “And I don’t think technology necessarily makes everything better. I don’t think it’s improving the quality of the line calling because line calling was always excellent.”

The shift toward electronic line calling (ELC) aligns Wimbledon with other major tennis events. While the ATP and WTA Tours, along with the Australian and US Opens, have embraced this technology, Roland-Garros remains the lone grand slam using human officials for calls. The decision at Wimbledon has stirred mixed reactions, highlighting the balance between tradition and technological progression.

The All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) chief executive, Sally Bolton, noted that the change is designed to provide “maximum accuracy in our officiating” and ensure players experience “the same conditions” as in most other events. Andrew Jarrett, Wimbledon’s tournament referee between 2006 and 2019, argued that the adoption of electronic systems is “almost certainly correct,” citing improved accuracy over human eyesight.

Despite its advantages, Eyre and other purists grieve the disappearing role of line judges. “You have to be a bit of a saint to want to spend your weekends umpiring children’s tennis matches without the carrot of Wimbledon at the end of it,” she remarked, highlighting the reduced incentive for aspiring officials.

Players’ opinions on the shift vary. Women’s top seed Aryna Sabalenka expressed a slight preference for electronic systems due to their clarity, while defending women’s champion Barbora Krejčíková and American star Frances Tiafoe prefer the traditional method that allowed for line call challenges.

The transition to technology is not without hiccups. An automated “out” call during a recent match caused confusion and laughter among spectators, demonstrating some imperfections in the new system. Similarly, concerns about the volume of electronic calls have been raised, with some players claiming they are not always audible, unlike the clear shouts from human judges.

Despite these challenges, Wimbledon’s move away from human line judges signifies a broader trend within tennis, emphasizing technological accuracy over tradition. Yet, many, including Eyre, remember line judging with fondness.

“We just wanted to be part of something we loved,” said Eyre. As she transitions from line judging to stand-up comedy, she reflects on the unique aspects of her former role that made it so special and, perhaps, now missed.

The storied charm of Wimbledon’s human line judges is likely to be remembered with nostalgia—an emblem of the tournament’s rich history now absorbed into the annals of sporting evolution.

Line judges at Wimbledon, once thought of as merely functional, now hold a place in tennis history cherished by traditionalists who keenly feel their absence.

 

Law Targeting Nazis May Strip Citizenship from More Americans

The U.S. Department of Justice, under the Trump administration, is looking to expand its denaturalization efforts, placing millions of naturalized citizens at potential risk of losing their citizenship.

The Justice Department (DOJ) has traditionally employed denaturalization powers to revoke citizenship from those who falsely obtained it or hid significant parts of their past, such as former Nazis. However, a recent memo indicates a potential broadening of this scope under the current Trump administration, raising concerns among legal experts.

According to the memo, attorneys are now instructed to focus their efforts on denaturalizing individuals who may pose a “potential danger to national security.” This marks a shift that aligns with the administration’s stringent immigration policies and could affect a significant number of naturalized citizens by risking their deportation.

The efforts prioritize individuals who have committed violent crimes or are associated with gangs, drug cartels, or have engaged in fraudulent activities. The memo, issued by the head of the DOJ’s Civil Division, outlines these priorities.

Experts and officials are voicing concerns that the broader initiative may instill fear among legal immigrants, especially those critical of the Trump administration. Cassandra Burke Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, expressed concern about this potential politicization of citizenship, stating, “The politicization of citizenship rights is something that really worries me, I think it’s just flatly inconsistent with our democratic system.”

This current effort harkens back to a McCarthy-era statute initially used to identify Communists. Over the years, it has primarily targeted war criminals, marked by the establishment of a DOJ unit in 1979 which focused on deporting individuals affiliated with the Nazis.

More historic efforts included Operation Janus under the Obama administration, focusing on identity theft in obtaining citizenship. Trump had previously attempted to extend denaturalization by establishing a specialized office at the DOJ in 2020, which was later dismantled by the Biden administration.

On returning to power, Trump has aimed to remodel immigration enforcement broadly, enlisting agencies like the FBI and U.S. Marshals in deportation efforts and scrutinizing foreign student visas. The new directive does not revive the prior office; instead, it prompts the entire Civil Division to prioritize denaturalization “in all cases permitted by law,” as per the memo. This guidance suggests that U.S. attorneys across the nation should highlight cases potentially suitable for denaturalization proceedings.

During Trump’s first term, 102 denaturalization cases were filed, compared to the 24 cases filed under Biden, stated Chad Gilmartin, a DOJ spokesperson. In Trump’s second term, five cases have been filed in its initial five months.

The DOJ clarified, “Denaturalization proceedings will only be pursued as permitted by law and supported by evidence against individuals who illegally procured or misrepresented facts in the naturalization process.” However, several current and former DOJ officials expressed concern that the memo’s broad directives could be used to expel individuals based on vague allegations.

Robertson noted that the administration might seek out historical errors in the naturalization process of political opponents, including student activists. Irina Manta, a law professor at Hofstra University, suggested the policy change could stifle free speech due to fear among citizens, stating, “I regularly observe the fear firsthand.”

Adding to this concern, Trump has suggested deporting certain American citizens, although his seriousness remains ambiguous. He has implied that the administration should potentially examine removing individuals, like criticizing businessman Elon Musk, following a disagreement over policy.

In a formal step reflecting this stance, Congressman Andy Ogles recently requested Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate whether Zohran Mamdani, a New York City mayoral candidate and naturalized citizen from Uganda, should be considered for denaturalization due to his political expressions in support of contentious figures.

The broader implications of these potential policy shifts remain provocative, with significant apprehension among legal professionals and immigrants distressed over what may follow, according to CNN.

Source: Original article

Trump Signs Significant Bill into Law

President Trump signed a comprehensive reconciliation package into law, incorporating tax cuts and Medicaid reductions, marking a major political achievement for his administration following extensive negotiations with Congressional Republicans.

President Trump finalized a significant legislative accomplishment on Friday by signing into law an expansive reconciliation package that includes extended tax cuts and phased-in reductions to Medicaid, culminating after months of challenging negotiations with Republicans on Capitol Hill.

The signing took place during a Fourth of July military family picnic at the White House. Trump had aimed to have the legislation ready by Independence Day, a goal that seemed uncertain just days before. “We made promises, and it’s really promises made, promises kept, and we’ve kept them,” Trump declared from the balcony overlooking the South Lawn. He added, “This is a triumph of democracy on the birthday of democracy. And I have to say, the people are happy.”

First Lady Melania Trump, various Cabinet officials, and numerous Republican lawmakers, including Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.), House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), and Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), attended the ceremony. The event featured added spectacles such as a flyover by two B-2 bombers. These aircraft recently carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities last month.

The Senate passed its version of the bill early Tuesday morning, with Vice President Vance casting the tie-breaking vote after three Republicans opposed it. The House approved the legislation without amendments on Thursday afternoon, following extended efforts to secure support from hesitant members during a procedural vote. The final House vote was close at 218-214, with two Republicans voting against it.

Friday’s bill signing capped off a series of favorable developments for Trump, including achievements in foreign policy, a strong jobs report, and historic low apprehension numbers at the southern border. “We’ve I think had probably the most successful almost six months as a president and the presidency,” Trump stated. “I think they’re saying it was the best six months, and I know for a fact they’re saying the last two weeks, there has never been anything like it as far as winning, winning, winning.”

The legislation incorporates key elements from Trump’s 2024 campaign platform. It extends the tax cuts originally enacted in 2017, which were due to expire later this year. It also eliminates certain taxes on tipped wages and raises the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions, a contentious issue during negotiations.

The bill allocates $150 billion for border wall funding, immigration enforcement, and deportations, alongside $150 billion in new defense spending for projects like shipbuilding and the “Golden Dome” missile defense initiative. It cuts green energy incentives while boosting domestic fossil fuel production. The legislation also increases the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, alleviating concerns about a potential federal default.

Democrats have criticized the bill for its cuts to low-income health and nutrition programs, arguing that these reductions offset tax cut revenue losses but also threaten health coverage for millions. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-Calif.) delivered an extensive speech opposing the bill, claiming it would harm working families. Trump dismissed Jeffries’ remarks and Democratic criticism as a “con job.”

Despite negative polling, White House officials have downplayed criticism, contending that public opinion will improve once Republicans adequately inform constituents about the bill’s benefits, according to The Hill.

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty & Dr. Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI

6 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPIFor the first time in the history of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI), during a formal ceremony Dr. Amit Chakrabarty and Dr. Hetal Gor were formally administered the oath of office as  the President & Chairperson of the Board of Trustees of AAPI, respectively at a solemn ceremony at the AAPI office in Oak Brook, IL, on July 3rd, 2025.

Dr. Suresh Reddy, a past President of AAPI and an elected Trustee of the Oak Brook Township administered the oath of Office to the incoming leaders of AAPI, who are committed to take AAPI to the next level in the coming year.

According to Dr. Satheesh Kathula, current President of AAPI, “In accordance with AAPI Bylaws, the President-Elect and Chair-Elect of the Board of Trustees officially assumed office on July 3rd. While the ceremonial Gavel Transfer will be held during the Annual Convention Gala on Saturday, July 26, 2025, the formal1 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI Presidential & BOT Chair Handover Ceremony was held on Thursday, July 3, 2025. This ceremony marks a meaningful leadership transition for our organization.”

“We have the potential to make a significant impact on the healthcare landscape of this country,” Dr. Chakrabarty said. “My goal this year is to unify AAPI by transcending the regional divides that have hindered our progress in recent years. Indian American physicians represent tremendous talent and potential, and the key to realizing that lies in collective action and a united voice—something I am committed to fostering.”

2 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPIDr. Hetal Gor, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist, assumed charge as the Chair, Board of Trustees of AAPI. Dr Gor is the president/Founder of Bergen Indian Medical Association , President /Founder of US chapter of FOGSI (Federation of OBGYN Society of India, and had served as the past President of the American Association of OBGYN of Indian Origin. Dr Gor is the Chair of North NJ chapter of Indian American Women Entrepreneurs Association. Dr Gor is a Board of Trustees of Bergen Performing Arts Center in Englewood, NJ, where she brings Indian art and artists to showcase Indian Heritage.

Dr. Meher Medavaram, a Board Certified in Family Medicine Physician and a Fellow of Academy of American Family3 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI Physician, serving as the Medical Director of Mount Sinai Hospital, FAQH Center, and a Staff Physician Advocate at Good Samaritan  Hospital as well as a Clinical Preceptor at UIC College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine CMU School of Medicine also was administered the oath of office as the President Elect of AAPI.

The growing influence of physicians of Indian heritage is evident, as increasingly physicians of Indian origin hold critical positions in healthcare, academic, research, and administrative positions across the nation. We the physicians of Indian origin are proud of our great 4 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPIachievements and contributions to our motherland, India, our adopted land, the US, and in a very significant way to the transformation of Indo-US relations.

Serving 1 in every 7 patients in the US, AAPI members care for millions of patients every day, while several of them have risen to hold high-flying jobs, shaping the policies and programs, and inventions that shape the landscape of healthcare in the US and around the world.5 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI

“Since its inception in 1982, AAPI has been at the forefront, representing a conglomeration of more than 125,000 practicing physicians in the United States, seeking to be the united voice for the physicians of Indian origin. I trust and believe that the new Team under Dr. Amit Chakrabarty will continue the noble mission and strengthen our efforts to make AAPI reach greater heights,” said Dr. Satheesh Kathula.  For more details about AAPI, please visit: www.appiusa,org

House Approves Trump’s Tax Bill, Marking Second-Term Milestone

House Republicans successfully passed President Donald Trump’s significant tax cuts and spending reduction bill, heralding it as a landmark achievement for his second term, despite fierce opposition from Democrats.

In a closely contested vote, House Republicans pushed through President Donald Trump’s tax cuts and spending reductions bill with a slim 218-214 margin. The approval came just in time for the Fourth of July deadline, signaling a high-stakes victory for Trump’s administration as they compile a core policy initiative early in his second term.

The bill, widely seen as a key GOP victory, was finalized amidst controversy and political maneuvering. Two Republican lawmakers joined all Democrats in opposing the legislation. GOP leaders, in collaboration with Trump, worked tirelessly to quell internal dissent and secure the votes necessary for passage.

Celebrating the legislative success in Iowa at the start of events commemorating the nation’s approaching 250th anniversary, Trump expressed gratitude toward Republican lawmakers, disparaging Democrats for their resistance to what he described as a beneficial measure.

House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana echoed Trump’s sentiment, encouraging Republicans to unify behind the bill. The colossal document, nearing 900 pages, encapsulates multiple Republican priorities under one legislative package, now labeled colloquially as Trump’s “one big beautiful bill.”

The enactment preserves $4.5 trillion in tax cuts from 2017 and introduces new ones, favoring provisions such as deductions for workers’ tips and overtime, and a sizeable deduction for older adults with particular income qualifications. Furthermore, it pledges $350 billion towards national security, including advancement in Trump’s deportation policies and the development of a new defensive system, dubbed the “Golden Dome.”

However, to offset substantial tax revenue losses, the bill implements substantial reductions, slashing $1.2 trillion from Medicaid and food stamp funding, with stricter work requirements imposed on beneficiaries. The Congressional Budget Office warns of a $3.3 trillion deficit increase over the next decade, with 11.8 million individuals potentially losing health coverage.

The bill starkly contrasts with Democratic priorities and faced unified Democratic opposition. Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York mounted a record-breaking speech on the House floor, challenging the ramifications of Trump’s “big ugly bill.” His extensive address underscored Democrats’ concerns over social program cutbacks, painting the legislation as detrimental to vulnerable populations.

As Jeffries highlighted the human costs, Democrats collectively denounced the measure as regressive and harmful to working-class citizens. Jeffries’ heartfelt oration warned of life-threatening consequences due to Medicaid cuts and their broader impact on public welfare. Republican counterarguments focused on preventing imminent tax increases while reaffirming beliefs in economic growth and program efficacy through regulatory revisions.

The Senate approved the bill days prior, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. As tensions simmered on the House floor, Johnson and Trump’s team marshaled extensive resources to rally wavering Republicans, balancing concerns between moderates and conservatives within the party.

After the conclusion of the vote, jubilant Republicans celebrated, with Trump loyalists attributing personal political stakes to the passage of the bill. Critics warned that bucking Trump’s agenda could result in significant electoral consequences, illustrating the fierce political entanglements intertwined with the passage of the legislation.

The bill represents a profound challenge to former Democratic administrations’ accomplishments, notably scaling back healthcare expansions from the Affordable Care Act and relaxing green energy incentives earmarked in prior congressional terms. Democrats caution against severe social repercussions, particularly for those reliant on federal assistance programs.

In summary, proponents argue the legislation fosters economic sustainability and secures Trump’s fiscal legacy, while detractors emphasize its expansive social health costs. The ongoing debate underscores entrenched partisan divides, persistent ideological battles, and the complexity of bipartisan governance.

According to Associated Press

Source: Original article

India-US Interim Trade Deal Expected; Agriculture a Key Issue

An interim trade deal between India and the United States is expected to be finalized within the next two days, as negotiators work to overcome differences primarily surrounding agriculture and dairy sector access.

An interim trade agreement between India and the United States is anticipated to be finalized within the next 48 hours. This development comes just days before the July 9 deadline for President Donald Trump’s proposed reciprocal tariffs, according to sources familiar with the negotiations. The discussions are in their final stages, with India firmly maintaining its position against fully opening its agriculture and dairy sectors to the United States.

India is keen to secure greater access for its labor-intensive industries such as textiles, gems and jewelry, leather goods, plastics, and chemicals. This aspect of the negotiations reflects India’s effort to expand its presence in the U.S. market while safeguarding its own sensitive sectors.

The key sticking point involves the Trump administration’s insistence on wider access to India’s agricultural sector. Lead negotiator and special secretary Rajesh Agarwal has had to extend his stay in Washington as talks continue. India has resisted lowering tariffs on genetically modified crops such as corn, soybeans, rice, and wheat grown in the United States, and has also rejected the opening of its dairy sector, which supports over 80 million workers.

The reluctance to ease restrictions on agriculture is rooted in the politically sensitive nature of the sector in India, where fears of increased foreign competition could spark farmer protests. This resistance illustrates the complexities facing trade negotiators as they attempt to balance domestic political concerns with international trade objectives.

President Trump has previously accused India of being a significant abuser of tariffs and has threatened to impose a 26% duty on Indian imports under a set of reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2. While he suspended these tariffs for 90 days to provide time for negotiation, Trump has reiterated the need for a trade deal with reduced tariffs that enables open competition between the two nations.

“I think we are going to have a deal with India. And that is going to be a different kind of a deal,” Trump said, emphasizing that less restrictive trade policies would allow both countries to compete effectively. He called for India to open its markets to foreign competition, suggesting that an agreement on reduced tariffs could be reached soon.

The bilateral trade agreement (BTA) aims to significantly increase trade between the two countries, with a target of doubling its value to $500 billion by 2030. This ambitious goal was also highlighted during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the United States earlier this year.

As both sides work to finalize the terms of the trade pact, the outcome will be closely watched by industry stakeholders and policymakers in both countries, who hope to see a sustainable path forward for U.S.-India trade relations.

Source: Original article

House Approves Tax and Spending Bill, Benefiting Johnson and Trump

House Republicans passed President Trump’s sweeping legislation on Thursday, marking a significant legislative victory as it now awaits the president’s signature.

In a vote that concluded with a narrow margin of 218-214, two Republican lawmakers joined all Democrats in opposing the bill, which has been touted by President Trump as his “big, beautiful bill.” The legislation now heads to Trump’s desk, where he is expected to sign it on July 4, meeting his self-imposed deadline for enacting the package.

The road to passage was not without its hurdles. The GOP leadership kept procedural votes open for several hours in an attempt to persuade undecided members to support the measure. President Trump played an active role in rallying support, while House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) delivered an extensive speech lasting 8 hours and 44 minutes in opposition to the legislation.

Despite these challenges, the passage of the bill represents a major triumph for both President Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), solidifying their legislative agenda amidst a closely divided Congress.

The vote saw Republican Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania break ranks with their party, ultimately voting against the bill.

Alongside his political endeavors, President Trump is scheduled to accompany First Lady Melania Trump in a meeting with former Israeli hostage Edan Alexander later on Thursday. Following this engagement, President Trump will travel to Iowa to deliver a speech at the state fairgrounds, signaling the commencement of the nation’s 250th-year celebrations.

The developments come as Trump maintains a significant presence on the political stage, with his legislative priorities playing a central role in shaping the current political landscape.

According to The Hill, the legislative journey of this bill has involved significant strategic maneuvering and political involvement from the highest levels of government.

Source: Original article

Jaishankar Discusses Quad, US-India Relations, and Political Unity

India’s Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar highlighted the political pluralism and unity displayed by India’s All-Party delegations and provided insights into the progress of the Quad’s initiatives during a press conference in Washington, D.C.

India’s Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar emphasized the global advocacy efforts of seven All-Party delegations that followed Operation Sindoor, remarking on how these initiatives showcase India’s “political pluralism” and deliver a powerful “unified message.”

Speaking at a press conference on July 2, 2025, at the Willard Intercontinental in Washington, D.C., Jaishankar responded to a query from the South Asian Herald, highlighting the unity demonstrated by diverse political figures coming together on key issues. He noted, “When you have a set of people with a track record, with that diversity—you actually saw the political pluralism of India come together on an important issue and send a strong unified message.”

Joined by the Indian Ambassador to the United States, Vinay Kwatra, and Additional Secretary (Americas) Nagaraj Naidu, Jaishankar expressed personal admiration for the initiative, stating it demonstrated India’s national interest positively. “We very much value and appreciate what they did,” he said, emphasizing the importance of a wide-ranging delegation speaking with one voice on international platforms to convey national unity.

The project, comprising leaders across the political spectrum such as Shashi Tharoor, Supriya Sule, Ghulam Nabi Azad, Kanimozhi Karunanidhi, and several others alongside ruling party members like Ravi Shankar Prasad, and Jai Panda, reflected the initiative’s diverse nature. It also included those with foreign affairs experience, including Salman Khurshid and Anand Sharma.

In response to another inquiry regarding the progress of the Quad, Jaishankar described it as a “unique organization” without a formal legal framework but united by “commonality of purpose” and “convergence of interest.”

“There’s a universe of things remaining to be done,” he explained, discussing the evolving agenda shaped by changing global needs, with issues like undersea cables and critical minerals moving to the forefront of discussions.

Jaishankar shared insights from the recent Foreign Ministers’ meeting on July 1, noting it was more extensive compared to earlier meetings. During discussions, the Quad members agreed to strengthen strategic stability in the Indo-Pacific and delved into regional issues, notably those involving Israel, Iran, and U.S. regional engagement.

Specific initiatives announced include the Quad Critical Minerals Initiative, focusing on mineral recovery, an Indo-Pacific Logistics Network, the Quad-at-Sea Ship Observer Mission for enhanced Coast Guard cooperation, and a Maritime Legal Dialogue to be hosted online by India.

Additional efforts include an Expanded Indo-Pacific partnership on maritime domain awareness, a Maritime Initiative for Training in the Indo-Pacific workshop, a Ports of the Future Partnership conference, and a conference on undersea cables under the Quad Partnership on Cable Connectivity and Resilience.

Jaishankar emphasized the Quad’s focus on four key thematic areas: Maritime and Transnational Security; Economic Prosperity and Security; Critical and Emerging Technologies; and Humanitarian Assistance and Emergency Response.

Further illustrating the depth of India’s diplomatic engagements, he recounted bilateral discussions with Secretary of State Marco Rubio on wide-ranging issues such as trade, technology, defense, and energy. Additional meetings with Australia’s Foreign Minister Penny Wong, Japan’s Foreign Minister Iwaya Takeshi, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Energy Secretary Chris Wright further underscored strong bilateral ties.

Responding to a question on the U.S.-India relationship’s foundation, Jaishankar underscored the partnership’s centrality by acknowledging India’s position as a leading global economy and its collaborative efforts in sectors like trade and technology.

He affirmed the Quad’s respect for ASEAN’s central role in regional matters, noting the group’s considerable focus on ASEAN. As the sole Global South nation in the Quad, India voices developing countries’ priorities and perspectives during discussions, which also include development projects in the Global South.

Looking ahead, India is preparing to host the next Quad Summit later this year and has shared preliminary proposals with other member countries, according to Jaishankar.

Source: Original article

“The World’s Happiest Man” Premieres at NAIFF 2025 Festival

The U.S. premiere of “The World’s Happiest Man” at the Nepal-America International Film Festival 2025 highlighted the power of cinema to bridge diverse cultures and address compelling immigrant narratives.

The much-anticipated U.S. premiere of the feature film “The World’s Happiest Man” was celebrated during a red-carpet event on June 28, 2025, at the AFI Silver Theatre and Cultural Center in Silver Spring, Maryland. The event was a part of the Nepal-America International Film Festival (NAIFF), which showcased more than 30 films from 14 countries, running from June 26-29 across venues in Silver Spring and Greenbelt, Maryland.

“We’re trying to bridge diverse cultures in the United States through cinema,” said Purna Baraili, president of the Nepal America Film Society, which has hosted the NAIFF annually since 2017. This year’s festival featured critically acclaimed films such as “Shambhala,” directed by Min Bahadur Bham, which opened the festival and previously competed at the Berlin International Film Festival. The festival closed with “Pooja, Sir,” directed by Deepak Rauniyar, which initially premiered at the Venice International Film Festival.

Baraili acknowledged the significant contributions of Director Binod Paudel and legendary Nepali actor, filmmaker, and comedian Hari Bamsha Acharya, who were both present at the June 28 screening of “The World’s Happiest Man.” Director Paudel explained that the film centers on Nepali-speaking Bhutanese refugees who were expelled from Bhutan between 1998 and 1990. Having initially settled in Nepal for 22 years, many were subsequently resettled in the United States. The movie narrates the story of one individual living in the U.S. who desires to return to Bhutan but faces continual rejection of his visa applications. The film portrays the intricate psychological journey of this individual.

Paudel emphasized that the film explores the intergenerational dynamics of exile and adaptation, showing an older generation longing for their homeland, a middle generation caught between cultures, and a younger generation embracing an American identity. “This is an immigrant story. The movie captures the essence of the psychological journey of these generations at the same time,” he stated.

The concept of the film originated in Ohio in 2020, as Paudel observed an alarming frequency of suicides among the Bhutanese refugee community, often attributed to identity crises and psychological trauma. He developed the screenplay as a fictional narrative deeply rooted in real-life experiences after conducting research and speaking with affected families.

Filmed in various locations in Akron, Ohio, “The World’s Happiest Man” was completed and released in 2025. Expressing gratitude, Paudel said, “I was quite lucky that Acharya accepted my script and decided to act in my film.” Actor Acharya commented on his involvement, saying, “I was very impressed with his script. I read it three times and was happy that he reached out to me. I have seen his work previously as well. He also made a beautiful Nepali movie called ‘Bulbul.’ So, I agreed to the offer.”

“Bulbul” had also been screened at NAIFF in a previous edition. Paudel reiterated his long-standing support for Baraili and the Nepal America Film Society. Acharya noted that despite his over 20 visits to the U.S., this marked his first time attending a film festival in the country.

Actress Aditi Pyakurel, a Bhutanese refugee who also appeared in “The World’s Happiest Man,” shared her experiences with the film, stating, “It was fun acting in this movie – a story that’s like my own that I’ve seen reflected so much within my community.”

Meanwhile, Director Min Bahadur Bham, whose film “Shambhala” opened the festival, described it as his second feature, which was shot in the high Himalayas at altitudes ranging from 4,000 to 6,500 meters—a region known as one of the highest human settlements on Earth. Bham shared his inspiration, saying, “I used to hallucinate about my previous life. I always saw myself in some strange mountain village, as a young monk. Since that time, I was always curious to discover that place.”

Bham recounted writing a poem about reincarnation at 12 years old and a short story on the same theme during high school. After completing his first feature in 2015, he visited the village that had appeared in his visions and was amazed by the familiarity of every detail, from its landscapes and monastery to the local monks.

Among the attendees of the June 28 screening was director and producer Vijaykumar Mirchandani. Though his film was not selected for NAIFF this year, he came to support his peers. “But it’s always good to come and support your peers. I’m here to support one of the producers of the film, Kirtana Banskota, who is a friend of mine. She’s also an actor director for my next short film,” he said.

Kirtana Banskota, a co-founder of the Nepal America Film Society and NAIFF, traveled from Austin, Texas, for the festival. “The festival was founded in 2017 with the sole purpose of not only bridging communities together but also highlighting Nepali films,” she noted. NAIFF, supported by Prince George’s County, Maryland, is committed to offering local filmmakers opportunities to showcase their work alongside international cinema, according to South Asian Herald.

Source: Original article

U.S. Economy: 147K Jobs Added in June, Exceeding Expectations

The U.S. economy added 147,000 jobs in June while the unemployment rate held steady at 4.1 percent, surpassing economists’ expectations, according to the Labor Department.

The labor market continued its steady progress last month, outpacing economists’ predictions that called for 100,000 new jobs and a slight uptick in the unemployment rate to 4.3 percent. These numbers reflect the resilience of the U.S. economy, which has withstood challenges from President Trump’s extensive tariffs that have significantly raised import tax rates and fueled uncertainty about future trade relations.

Tensions over trade seemed to ease slightly as President Trump delayed or reduced some proposed tariffs initially set out in April. However, a deadline looms as the White House approaches a self-imposed cutoff on July 9 to negotiate agreements with nations affected by these tariffs. President Trump has maintained that he is prepared to re-impose significant tariffs, which could revive economic apprehension.

The June jobs report detailed sector-specific growth: the health sector saw an addition of 39,000 jobs, while social assistance jobs increased by 19,000. However, sectors such as oil and gas, construction, manufacturing, and mining saw little change, with manufacturing employment decreasing by 7,000 jobs for the month.

A notable rise in government employment contributed to the overall job growth, with 73,000 jobs added primarily at the state and local levels, while federal employment declined by 7,000 positions. Concurrently, the labor force experienced a decline of 130,000 individuals, with the workforce participation rate slightly decreasing to 62.3 percent from May’s 62.4 percent.

Amid these economic developments, the Federal Reserve has refrained from altering interest rates, holding off on cuts to evaluate the influence of tariffs and other macroeconomic factors on pricing. Inflation indicators show an upward trend with the consumer price index and the personal consumption expenditures price index recording annual increases of 2.4 percent and 2.3 percent, respectively.

There is anticipation among forecasters that the impact of tariffs on consumer prices will become more pronounced over the summer. However, uncertainties remain regarding how these import taxes will affect different points in the value chain, or if they will diminish product demand or be transferred to consumers.

President Trump has been vocal about his frustration towards the Federal Reserve’s reluctance to reduce rates, having sent a message to Fed Chair Jerome Powell urging significant rate cuts, citing substantial financial losses. Currently, U.S. inflation surpasses other regions, with the European Union achieving a 2 percent inflation rate in June, meeting the Fed’s target rate. Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank, noted this accomplishment at an international conference, while Jerome Powell attributed the Fed’s static rate policy to the ongoing tariffs imposed by the White House.

According to The Hill, these economic dynamics continue to play a vital role in shaping both domestic and international financial landscapes.

Source: Original article

Report Shows Increase in Hate Crimes Against Indian Communities in Canada

Hate crimes and harassment against South Asian communities, particularly those of Indian descent, have drastically increased in Canada, fueled by online extremist networks, according to a recent report by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD).

Hate speech and targeted harassment against South Asians have significantly escalated in Canada, with individuals of Indian origin being specifically targeted, according to a report from the UK-based Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD). The report highlights a dramatic rise in police-reported hate crimes against South Asians in Canada, increasing by 227 percent from 2019 to 2023. This surge positions them as the third most targeted racial group in the country, trailing behind Black and Arab communities.

On social media, the volume of posts containing anti-South Asian slurs skyrocketed by over 1,350 percent between 2023 and 2024, with more than 26,600 posts using derogatory terms like “pajeet” between May 2023 and April 2025. This spike in online vitriol has occurred alongside direct calls for deportation, as South Asians face demonization both online and offline.

A significant part of the rise in hate incidents is attributed to Canadian extremist networks, notably the alt-right organization Diagolon. Founded in 2020 by former Canadian Armed Forces member Jeremy MacKenzie, Diagolon has been central to the dissemination of anti-South Asian rhetoric. The group has launched coordinated attacks on elected officials, political candidates, and advocacy organizations, frequently employing hateful slogans that advocate for mass deportation.

Diagolon members have shared content celebrating violence against South Asians, including a disturbing Telegram video circulated in March 2025 showing a South Asian man being hit by a vehicle. The video was captioned with the phrase: “Yeet the jeet before a jeet yeets you!” using the shortened slur “jeet” from “pajeet.” Such violent slogans have gained popularity within the group.

In one instance from April 2025, a prominent Diagolon figure derisively conflated Sikhs with Hindus, Pakistanis, and Bangladeshis, claiming they “look, sound and smell the same.” The group has also reposted footage showing Indians being struck by trains, accompanied by celebratory captions. Moreover, they have targeted political figures, such as Jeff Lal, a Hindu candidate from the People’s Party of Canada, calling for his deportation.

The April 2025 Canadian federal election debate saw an uptick in extremist narratives, with more than 2,300 anti-South Asian posts generating over 1.2 million engagements between March 1 and April 20. Political figures were not spared; New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh was singled out, as evidenced by posts describing Sikh voters in Nova Scotia as proof of a “demographic replacement.” A Khalistani activist was similarly demonized as an “Indian invader,” with demands for his deportation circulating widely.

Diagolon’s attacks were not limited to individuals but extended to civil society organizations. When the World Sikh Organization (WSO) released an election guide focused on combating hate, it was met with a barrage of slurs. A Diagolon leader responded with dismissive hostility, suggesting members of the South Asian community return to their ancestral countries.

The rise in hate is not confined to Canada. ISD’s research, utilizing ethnographic monitoring and social media analytics, indicates that nearly a quarter of these hate-laden posts originated from the United States, with 36 percent coming from India itself. Far-right commentary from the UK and US has also contributed to the vilification of Canada’s Indian-origin population, framing the country as a failing multicultural endeavor.

The ISD report contextualizes this surge in hate within a broader landscape of economic anxiety and changes in immigration policies. In the face of housing shortages and job insecurities, public frustration has been directed towards immigrant communities, predominantly South Asians. Advocacy groups warn that recent governmental measures to cap immigration might unintentionally enhance xenophobic narratives.

Concluding its findings, ISD underscores the threat posed by this rise in hate as extending beyond law enforcement concerns. “This surge not only threatens the physical and psychological safety of South Asian communities but also deters affected individuals from civic engagement and weakens social cohesion,” the report asserts.

Source: Original article

House Approves Tax and Spending Bill Backed by Johnson, Trump

House Republicans narrowly passed President Trump’s “big, beautiful bill,” with a final vote of 218-214, sending it to his desk for signing.

House Republicans successfully passed President Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” on Thursday, with a tight vote margin of 218-214. The bill now awaits Trump’s signature, which is expected to take place on the Fourth of July, meeting the deadline he had set for its arrival at his desk.

The legislation’s passage did not come without challenges. GOP leaders engaged in hours of procedural votes, striving to secure the necessary support. Among those opposing the bill were two Republican representatives, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, who joined all Democrats in voting against it.

Trump was actively involved in the process, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) delivered a substantial floor speech that lasted 8 hours and 44 minutes, criticizing the legislation.

The bill’s approval represents a significant triumph for both President Trump and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-La.).

Beyond the legislative victory, President Trump plans to attend additional engagements. On Thursday, he will meet with former Israeli hostage Edan Alexander alongside First Lady Melania Trump. Following this meeting, he will travel to Iowa to commence the celebration of America’s 250th year with a speech at the state fairgrounds.

The original report of the bill’s passage was shared by The Hill.

Source: Original article

Study: 1 in 10 Adults Under 55 Leave Childhood Religion

One in ten adults under 55 worldwide have left their childhood religion, reflecting a subtle but significant global shift in religious affiliation.

According to a recent study by the Pew Research Center, as of 2020, approximately 76% of the world’s population identifies with a religion, marking a slight decrease from 77% in 2010. This change is primarily attributed to individuals shedding their religious identities after being raised in a religious environment. Most notably, among adults under 55 who were raised with a religion, an estimated 10% have since switched affiliations, choosing either another religion or no religion at all.

The study, which analyzed surveys from 117 countries and territories covering 92% of the global population in 2010, focuses on the age group of 18 to 54 years to examine contemporary patterns in religious switching. While such changes can occur at any stage of life, they are most prevalent in young adulthood. Researchers explored religious switching among Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and those identifying as religiously unaffiliated, noting that while Jews and other small religious groups were part of the study, their sample sizes were too small for individual analysis.

The category of “religiously unaffiliated” encompasses individuals who identify as atheists, agnostics, or respond with “nothing in particular” when questioned about religious identity. It also includes those who select “No religion” or “None” in various surveys and national censuses.

The study reveals that 91% of adults aged 18 to 54 remain within the religion or non-religion of their upbringing, a phenomenon known as “retention.” However, retention rates differ significantly among various religious categories. Hindus and Muslims exhibit the highest retention rates at 99% each, with only 1% of individuals raised in these faiths switching out. Among those who grew up without a religion, 93% continue to hold no religious affiliation.

Conversely, Christians, the largest religious group globally, show a lower retention rate with 83% of adults raised in the faith continuing to identify as Christian. Buddhists have the lowest retention rate among studied religions, with fewer than eight in ten (78%) retaining their childhood faith.

Globally, the most common trend in religious switching is disaffiliation—individuals leaving their childhood religion to adopt no religious identity. Both Buddhists and Christians demonstrate the highest rates of individuals transitioning to a religiously unaffiliated status. For example, 19% of those raised as Buddhists no longer identify with any religion, while an additional 3% follow a different faith.

In contrast, it is more common for those raised as Hindus and Muslims to convert to other religions rather than to no religion at all. Meanwhile, 7% of individuals brought up without a religious background have embraced a religion during adulthood.

The impact of religious switching on each group’s size depends not only on retention but also on the number of newcomers to the faith. Christians have witnessed the largest overall losses due to religious switching, with a net loss of 11.6 individuals per 100 raised as Christians. Buddhists experience significant losses as well, losing 22.1 people per 100 raised as Buddhists, offset by a relatively high joining rate, resulting in a net loss of 9.8 people.

On the other hand, the religiously unaffiliated category has seen a net gain of 16.7 individuals per 100 originally raised without a religion, indicating the highest rate of people joining (24.2) against a moderate leaving rate (7.5).

Muslim and Hindu populations have remained largely unaffected by religious switching as the rates of entrance into and exit from these religions have roughly balanced out. However, the Christian and Buddhist shares of the global population have declined between 2010 and 2020, with Christians dropping by 1.8 percentage points and Buddhists by 0.8 points.

Religious switching is more prevalent in countries with a high Human Development Index (HDI), which measures life expectancy, education, and income. In regions with HDI scores of 0.8 or higher—classified by the United Nations as “high”—18% of individuals aged 18 to 54 have changed religions. Conversely, in the 16 countries with HDI scores below 0.55, only 3% of the same age group have switched religions.

However, economic development alone does not explain the patterns of religious switching, as several countries across different HDI score ranges demonstrate low switching rates, particularly in many Muslim-majority nations and Buddhist-majority countries like Thailand and Cambodia. Legal restrictions in some regions, such as Algeria, Brunei, Egypt, and Malaysia—where laws impose penalties for leaving Islam—also contribute to these low switching rates. In India, numerous states enforce anti-conversion laws, further influencing religious retention.

These findings suggest a nuanced but meaningful shift in global religious dynamics, with implications for cultural and sociopolitical landscapes worldwide.

Source: Original article

Project 2025 Groups Impact Supreme Court Decisions in 2023

Groups linked to the conservative Project 2025 were highly influential in this year’s Supreme Court decisions, with the majority of rulings favoring arguments aligned with their agenda.

During this Supreme Court term, organizations associated with Project 2025—a controversial conservative policy agenda created by the Heritage Foundation—played a significant role. These groups found favor in multiple pivotal cases, with the court siding with their perspectives more often than not. Nevertheless, setbacks did occur as the court also ruled against some cases directly linked to these organizations.

Project 2025 was primarily championed by the Heritage Foundation but included a network of over 100 conservative organizations on its advisory board. Designed ahead of the 2024 election, this agenda aimed to restructure the executive branch under a potential conservative president.

In a breakdown of the term’s Supreme Court cases, approximately 30 organizations tied to Project 2025 filed amicus briefs, engaging in a total of 12 critical cases decided between October 2024 and June. This analysis indicates that these groups were involved in four key cases through direct representation: Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond and Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, managed by Alliance Defending Freedom; Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, concerning the Affordable Care Act, managed by America First Legal; and FCC v. Consumers Research, involving challenges to regulations by the Texas Public Policy Foundation.

Beyond these, a variety of organizations, along with Project 2025-linked groups, submitted amicus briefs nearly 60 times in major court cases this term. The Supreme Court aligned with the interests of these groups in eight of the 12 major cases reviewed by Forbes. These decisions included allowing restrictions on transgender health care and Planned Parenthood funding, expanding religious tax exemptions, maintaining Texas’ age verification law, dismissing Mexico’s lawsuit against U.S. gun-makers, and upholding the federal TikTok ban.

However, the justices rejected cases concerning religious charter schools, the Affordable Care Act, the FCC, and federal rules on ghost guns, indicating limitations in Project 2025’s judicial influence.

Alliance Defending Freedom emerged as the group with the highest number of filings and a substantial Supreme Court presence. In addition to being a party in two cases, it also filed multiple amicus briefs and saw its members drafting briefs on behalf of other similarly aligned organizations.

The Heritage Foundation, the leading entity behind Project 2025, did not engage in any direct Supreme Court cases. Nevertheless, they expressed approval of several court rulings this term, particularly those affecting transgender healthcare, President Trump’s citizenship case, and decisions on educational content and Planned Parenthood funding.

Controversy surrounded Project 2025 as several groups listed as advisory board members distanced themselves, citing reasons that ranged from unintentional registration to political alignment discrepancies. Various organizations, such as Americans United for Life, withdrew their association citing nonpartisanship.

While Project 2025 maintains a primarily executive branch focus, its agenda aligns with certain Supreme Court decisions, especially around topics like gender-affirming care bans, parental rights in education, and opposition to Planned Parenthood funding. These overlaps highlight the broader conservative policy shifts that reflect the group’s proposed policies.

Project 2025’s origins trace back to a concerted effort for potential GOP governance, featuring a database of potential White House team members and a 900-page policy blueprint. The plan proposes comprehensive reforms across federal agencies to concentrate power in the presidency. Despite being disavowed by President Trump prior to the 2024 election, the overlap in personnel and policy between Trump’s second term and Project 2025’s proposals has continued, aligning with the organization’s vision as described by former project head Paul Dans.

According to Forbes, this year’s Supreme Court decisions have spotlighted Project 2025’s broader influence within conservative policy-making circles, illustrating a complex political ecosystem shaped by shared goals among right-leaning entities.

Source: Original article

Eucharistic Host Miracle in Vatican Recognized as Holy Event

Vatican approval has officially recognized a Eucharistic miracle in Kerala, India, where witnesses claim the Holy Face of Jesus appeared on a host in 2013.

The Vatican has validated reports of a Eucharistic miracle in the Christ the King Church, located in Vilakkannur, Kerala, India, where believers say the face of Jesus Christ appeared on a consecrated host during a Mass in 2013. This recognition comes more than a decade after the phenomenon was first reported.

The extraordinary event took place on November 15, 2013, when Rev. Fr. Thomas Pathickal was conducting a morning Mass. During the elevation of the host, a mysterious spot was noticed, which gradually transformed into what appeared to be the face of Jesus Christ. Thousands of people flocked to the church to witness and venerate the host.

Following the initial appearance, the host was sent for scientific evaluation three days later, and subsequently returned to Christ the King Church for veneration. It was decreed by the diocese that the host should be placed at a specially arranged site on a side altar, rather than the main altar, and was not to be used for Eucharistic adoration.

The Vatican’s decision to authenticate the event was confirmed in May 2025, delivering validation and a sense of spiritual affirmation to the thousands who visited the church since the occurrence. A statement from the official website of the Eucharistic miracle describes the moment Rev. Fr. Pathickal noticed the transformation of the host as it presented the face of Jesus during the Mass.

In an earlier interview with Matters India in 2020, Baby Joseph Payikatt, a former parish trustee, recounted how the host was taken to the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church headquarters in Kakkanad, India, where it was presented to Apostolic Nuncio Archbishop Giambattista Diquattro. A special Mass and prayers were held at Christ the King Church before presenting the host to the apostolic nuncio.

Payikatt also highlighted the profound impact of the event on the church community, noting that hundreds of people have visited the parish, praying and witnessing the host. The phenomenon reportedly brought significant spiritual and social changes among the parishioners.

Additionally, Archbishop George Njaralakatt has encouraged the documentation of any signs or supernatural occurrences associated with the Eucharistic miracle, suggesting that the event’s implications continue to unfold in the lives of the faithful.

This miraculous event’s Vatican endorsement confirms the enduring interest and significance of spiritual phenomena in the Catholic faith, as believers around the world look to these occurrences for inspiration and religious affirmation, according to ChurchPOP.

Source: Original article

House GOP Leaders Strive to Unite on Trump Megabill

GOP leaders are racing to secure alignment within their ranks to pass a pivotal Senate bill that embodies former President Trump’s domestic agenda before the impending holiday weekend.

Republican leaders face significant challenges as they attempt to unify their caucus behind a substantial Senate bill aimed at implementing key aspects of former President Trump’s agenda, including substantial tax cuts, stricter immigration policies, a pivot from green energy initiatives, and significant reductions in federal health and nutrition programs.

The endeavor comes amid resistance from both moderate Republicans concerned about increased Medicaid cuts and conservatives alarmed by a rise in deficit spending, both measures exacerbated in the Senate’s version of the legislation. This discord poses a critical test for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and other GOP leaders who are under pressure to pass the bill, which demands nearly unanimous support given the slim Republican majority in the House.

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), a prominent member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, voiced skepticism about the bill’s ability to achieve the Trump administration’s objectives. “I know why they’re going to lobby for it, I know why the president’s going to push for it. They want to see it get done, and I get it,” Roy said, but he added, “But I think we have more work to do.”

Tensions are rising as House Republicans must decide between opposing a Senate-modified bill they originally supported or yielding to pressure for party unity and delivering Trump a legislative victory. Some, like a moderate House Republican, have expressed uncertainty about the best course of action. “Maybe I’ll get lucky and have a rough enough landing or something that I’m unable to make [it] to D.C. for a few weeks,” the member said to The Hill.

Former President Trump is actively lobbying Republicans to back the bill, with threats suggesting primary challenges against those who oppose what he calls the “big, beautiful bill.” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who opposed the House version in May, faces a MAGA-backed push to unseat him due to his expected dissent against the Senate bill.

Meanwhile, Democrats remain critical of the legislation, which includes significant cuts in low-income health and nutrition programs to fund tax reductions. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) highlighted the bill’s potential impact on constituents, questioning why Republicans, especially those in competitive districts, would support it.

With a self-imposed deadline to pass the bill by July 4, Speaker Johnson acknowledges the ambitious timeline. He stated, “We’ll see what happens in the next 24 hours,” also admitting discontent with the Senate’s modifications but recognizing the necessity to advance without alterations to avoid another Senate vote.

There are doubts regarding the House’s ability to meet this timeline, as expressed by Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R-Ind.) on social media. Stutzman pointed out the Senate’s “unacceptable increases to the national debt and the deficit,” making House passage challenging.

The urgency is evident as the House Rules Committee convened to discuss the bill, marking the beginning of its progression through the House. If cleared, GOP leaders plan to move forward quickly, initiating debates and votes as early as Wednesday morning. However, initial steps face obstacles. Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), aligned with the Freedom Caucus, announced opposition to the procedural rule necessary for advancing the bill, threatening a legislative standstill.

The margin is slim, with Republicans allowed only three defections if Democrats uniformly oppose the rule. Already, Harris and Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) have committed to voting against it.

Trump, undeterred, hailed the Senate’s passage and urged House Republicans to follow suit. “I thought the Senate was going to be tougher than the House. We got there. We got pretty much what we wanted,” he said, emphasizing the importance of passing the landmark bill.

A senior White House official, stressing urgency, called for the bill’s enactment in its present form by the July 4 deadline to allow Trump to sign it ceremonially on Independence Day. “The end of the road is here. The bill is finished. The bill needs to be sent to the president’s desk and it needs to be done … on or before July 4,” the official stated.

The administration is conducting an extensive effort to galvanize support, utilizing top officials, including Trump, his budget director, and heads of relevant departments, to coordinate the endeavor.

Source: Original article

Gill Blasts Akash Deep For Big Mistake In 2nd Test: Dekh Kya Raha Hai?

Shubman Gill slammed a majestic 269, a knock which will be talked about a lot in future, as he carried a dominant India to 587 in 151 overs of their first innings

The second day of the second India vs England Test in Birmingham belonged to one man – Shubman Gill. The Indian cricket team captain slammed a majestic 269, a knock which will be talked about a lot in future, as he carried a dominant India to 587 in 151 overs of their first innings. It was a statement knock where Gill passed every challenge with his grit and determination to bat for more than eight hours and post the highest score by an Indian batter in Tests in England, as well as for an India captain overall.

With his technical excellence in attacking bowlers and being water tight in defence against good balls, Gill left everyone in awe of his knock laced with 30 fours and three sixes. Gill is now the seventh highest scorer for an Indian batter in Tests.

Just before Tea on Day 2, Gill wanted to take a quick single but Akash Deep was not quite ready. He was slow to start as Ollie Pope, at mid on, showed alacrity to dive to his right, and threw the ball towards the keeper.

It was not an accurate throw and gave Akash Deep some extra time to get back to his crease. Gill, after reaching the non-striker’s end, gave Akash Deep a piece of his mind. “Dekh kya raha hai? Bhaag jaldi se (What are you staring at? Run quickly)” Gill screamed. This was Gill’s rare outburst at a teammate after becoming India Test captain.

pic.twitter.com/cXM1utO4a8
— Nihari Korma (@NihariVsKorma) July 3, 2025

Apart from that, Gill was a picture of calm.

At 211/5, a total worth 450 wasn’t a practical possibility for India. But Gill stepped up in stunning fashion to hit his career-best knock in Tests and ensure India ended 13 runs away from reaching 600, which is now their fourth highest total in Tests.

Ravindra Jadeja (89) and Washington Sundar (42) gave him solid support in adding partnerships of 203 and 144 for the sixth and seventh wickets with Gill, meaning that the lower-order runs did come for India. For England, who didn’t get much help on offer, Shoaib Bashir ended with figures of 3-167, while Chris Woakes and Josh Tongue took 2-81 and 2-119 respectively.

With IANS inputs

DHS Adds New Languages to CBP Home Mobile App to Support Voluntary Self-Deportation Under Project Homecoming

Chinese and Hindi added to the CBP Home Mobile App

WASHINGTON – The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced it is adding two new languages to the CBP Home Mobile App: Simplified Chinese and Hindi. This update dramatically expands the app’s accessibility to make it easier for millions of illegal aliens to voluntarily self-deport under President Trump’s Project Homecoming initiative.

With these new additions, even more illegal aliens can take control of their departure, avoid detention, and manage their return with dignity and order.

“There is ZERO excuse for you to stay in the United States if you are an illegal alien. The United States taxpayer is generously offering those in this country illegally $1,000 and a free flight home.” said DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. “These new languages make it easier than ever for illegal aliens to do the right thing and self deport with dignity and order. Don’t make us come after you. If we do, you will be arrested, fined, deported, and never allowed to return. Download the CBP Home Mobile App and leave NOW.”

Through Project Homecoming, illegal aliens who self-deport using the CBP Home Mobile App benefit from several incentives, including:

  • Cost-free travel to their home country or another country where they have lawful status.
  • Forgiveness of civil fines for failure to depart after a final order or voluntary departure order.
  • A $1,000 exit bonus upon confirmed return, using the mobile app.
  • Preserve the potential opportunity to return to the United States the right, legal way.

CBP Home is available for free on any Apple or Android device via Apple’s App Store and Google Play, or directly from DHS.gov. For further information, visit DHS.gov/CBPhome.

Senate Passes Latest Version of Trump’s Bill

Republicans are nearing the passage of a dramatic tax and spending cut bill, loaded with tax breaks, defense spending, and provisions aimed at President Trump’s border security agenda, while facing staunch Democratic opposition.

The Republican-led initiative, encompassing roughly 887 pages, is a comprehensive measure that includes significant elements of tax cuts, fiscal adjustments, and conservative policy objectives. This extensive legislation aims to solidify President Donald Trump’s vision for comprehensive fiscal reform by the Fourth of July, compelling vacationing lawmakers to expedite the process.

If unified, the Republicans, who control both the House and Senate, could push the bill past one final hurdle in the House. Notably, Vice President JD Vance broke a tie in the Senate to propel the measure forward, while prior House approval was narrowly secured.

The substance of the bill is as varied as it is vast, containing provisions from tax amendments to immigration policy enhancements, and defense allocations. Central to the Republicans’ stance is the prevention of a looming tax hike, which they argue will take effect when existing tax breaks expire at year’s end.

The proposed tax legislation promises approximately $4.5 trillion in deductions, seeking to enshrine current tax rates and introduce new tax advantages championed during Trump’s campaign. These incentives include tax exemptions on tips and overtime pay, deductible auto loan interest, and a $6,000 tax deduction for older adults with earning restrictions.

Additionally, the bill seeks to raise the child tax credit, albeit modestly, from $2,000 to $2,200, leaving some low-income families unable to reap full benefits. The cap on state and local deductions—integral to high-tax states—would see a temporary fourfold increase but is limited to five years, conflicting with the House’s ten-year preference.

The legislation’s expansive provisions extend beyond individual and business realms, allocating funds for an aggressive border security plan, military enhancements, and infrastructure projects. Approximately $350 billion is earmarked for border enforcement and national security, with Trump’s ambitious border wall and large-scale deportation efforts at its core.

Immigration policy changes propose new fees, increased personnel, and incentivized state cooperation, with funding streams partially derived from these new fees. In tandem, the defense sector would witness investments in shipbuilding, missile defense, and servicemember welfare.

Offsetting these tax reductions and expenditures demands fiscal cuts, predominantly targeting Medicaid and nutritional assistance programs. Proposed reforms include heightened work requirements for Medicaid recipients and a contentious co-payment model for services. Based on a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecast, these adjustments could deny coverage and benefits to millions, further intensifying political discourse.

The contentious proposal also disrupts green energy tax credits pivotal to renewable energy growth, prompting Democratic objections regarding potential economic repercussions and environmental impacts. These reversals mark significant departures from former President Biden’s environmental and healthcare legislative milestones.

Amid controversial frontal tax policy changes, the bill augments deductions for metallurgical coal, introduces a national children’s savings initiative, and outlines funds for a proposed National Garden of American Heroes. Higher-education financial structures and gun licensing protocols will also see adjustments, alongside increases in federal borrowing limits.

Late-stage negotiations brought modest revisions, including increased rural healthcare funding and revised tax impositions on renewable energy projects. The CBO projects that cumulative deficit levels would escalate by roughly $3.3 trillion over a decade. However, Senate Republicans dispute these estimates, employing an accounting method that excludes existing tax benefits from the tally, an approach heavily scrutinized by both Democrats and watchdog entities.

This legislative saga demonstrates deep-seated partisan divides and polarizing fiscal ideologies, encapsulating President Trump’s hallmark economic agendas amid long-standing debates on fiscal responsibility and social justice.

Source: Original article

Global South Cardinals Urge Climate Action at Vatican

Three prominent cardinals from the Global South have issued a compelling call for decisive international action on climate change, warning of the dire consequences that await if the status quo is maintained.

Three influential cardinals from the Global South presented a significant document at the Vatican on Tuesday, urging for bold international measures on climate change. The call to action comes ahead of COP30, the 30th United Nations climate summit, scheduled to take place in November in Brazil.

“Our message today is not diplomatic — it is pastoral,” stated Cardinal Filipe Neri Ferrão, archbishop of Goa, India, and president of the Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences. “It is a call to conscience in the face of a system that threatens to devour creation.” Ferrão was joined by Cardinal Jaime Spengler, archbishop of Porto Alegre, Brazil, and president of the Latin American Bishops’ Conference, and Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo Besungu, archbishop of Kinshasa, Congo, and president of the Symposium of Episcopal Conferences of Africa and Madagascar.

The document, titled “A Call for Climate Justice and the Common Home: Ecological Conversion, Transformation and Resistance to False Solutions,” was crafted by bishops, activists, and climate experts from Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean. Addressed to world leaders, its release coincides with the 10th anniversary of both Pope Francis’ “green” encyclical, “Laudato Si’,” and the 195-nation Paris Agreement on climate change.

Pope Leo XIV, who endorsed the document and met with its authors, reflects a commitment to continuing his predecessor’s environmental legacy. The document describes the climate crisis as an existential issue of justice, dignity, and care for the world shared by all peoples.

“There is no climate justice without ecological conversion,” Cardinal Spengler remarked. “We need to move from consumption to sacrifice, from greed to generosity, from waste to sharing — from ‘I want’ to what God’s world needs.”

The churches of the Global South vowed to educate Catholics on environment-related issues and collaborate with nations at both local and global levels. They also called for a “historic coalition” between the Global South and North to address debt and advance justice.

“It is necessary for the advanced countries to recognize their historical and ecological debt as perpetrators of greenhouse emissions and resource extraction,” Ferrão emphasized.

The document references studies projecting that North America and Europe will have accumulated $192 trillion in ecological debt — an assessment involving past resource exploitation and historical emission contributions — by 2050. This contrasts with the estimated $2 trillion annually extracted from current Global South resources. The U.N. has noted the significant funds required for climate adaptation efforts. Furthermore, the document cautioned that regions in the Global South, which have contributed the least to climate change, bear its most severe consequences.

Cardinal Ambongo expressed a heartfelt appeal regarding the many Africans afflicted by climate change impacts. “Africa wants to live. Africa wants to breathe — and to contribute to justice for all humanity,” he stated.

Pope Francis previously championed the idea of “happy sobriety,” advocating for wealthier nations to relinquish excess and assume shared climate responsibility. His vision drew inspiration from indigenous values of “buen vivir,” or good living, which promote environmental harmony — values embraced by climate activists and institutions.

“If the Global North is not willing to make sacrifices, we will not advance in this matter. There is a price to pay,” Spengler warned, highlighting the need for wealthy countries to make “bold decisions” to prevent future generations from bearing high costs.

On another note, the document castigated “elites of power” for maintaining a “denialist and apathetic stance” on climate change. Spengler stressed that despite opposition from certain world leaders, Catholics must “promote conscience, education, and have the courage of prophetically declaring what we can and must do and not have fear.”

It also criticized the inequalities fostered by “green capitalism” — policies masked as environmentally beneficial but which ultimately enrich only a select few. The churches proposed a decentralized approach to renewable energy policies, aiming to benefit local communities and especially addressing the needs of the impoverished.

The cardinals urged Pope Leo to represent the Church at the upcoming COP30 summit in Brazil. However, during their meeting with him on Tuesday, he had not committed to attending. “We want the forthcoming COP30 to be not just another event, but a moral turning point,” Ferrão expressed.

Later in November, Leo is anticipated to visit Nicea, Turkey, to commemorate the 1,700th anniversary of the first ecumenical council.

Source: Original article

Jaishankar Refutes Trump’s Ceasefire Claims

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar refuted U.S. President Donald Trump’s claims that trade pressure was used to coerce India and Pakistan into agreeing to a ceasefire.

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has provided a firsthand account to counter U.S. President Donald Trump’s assertions regarding a purported use of trade pressure to achieve a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Jaishankar clarified that during crucial communications, no such linkage between trade and ceasefire was made as far as India was concerned.

Speaking in New York, Jaishankar recalled being present on May 9 when U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance spoke to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi via phone. “I can tell you that I was in the room when Vice President Vance spoke to Prime Minister Modi on the night of May 9, saying that the Pakistanis would launch a very massive assault on India,” he stated.

Jaishankar emphasized that India did not capitulate to any pressures and that Prime Minister Modi remained resolute despite threats from Pakistan. “We did not accept certain things,” he explained, “and the Prime Minister was impervious to what the Pakistanis were threatening to do.”

Jaishankar further elaborated that the Indian response was firm and immediate following Pakistan’s aggressive actions. “The Pakistanis did attack us massively that night, (and) we responded very quickly,” he recounted, providing a detailed sequence of events.

The sequence included a subsequent interaction with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, which Jaishankar discussed. “And the next morning, Mr. Rubio called me up and said the Pakistanis were ready to talk,” Jaishankar said, indicating a breakthrough in dialogues without mentioning any trade negotiations.

On the same day, Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations, Major General Kashif Abdullah, directly contacted his Indian counterpart, Lieutenant General Rajiv Ghai, to propose a ceasefire. Jaishankar reaffirmed these details from his personal experience, stressing the absence of trade discussions in these engagements.

Trump reiterated claims of having leveraged trade to mediate a ceasefire during a news conference in The Hague. He stated, “I ended that with a series of phone calls on trade,” alleging that both countries were pushed towards a deal by withholding trade agreements.

Jaishankar, however, contested these assertions, underscoring that trade and diplomacy operated independently. “I think the trade people are doing what the trade people should be doing, which is negotiate with numbers and lines and products and do their tradeoffs,” he said, emphasizing a more structured and professional approach to trade negotiations.

Operation Sindoor was initiated by India targeting terrorist bases in Pakistan as a retaliation for the Pahalgam terrorist attack, which was claimed to be orchestrated by The Resistance Front, a group linked to Pakistan-supported Lashkar-e-Taiba, according to IANS.

Source: Original article

GOP Leaders Work to Unite Party on Trump Megabill

Republican leaders in the House are urgently working to unite their party behind a substantial Senate bill aimed at enacting former President Donald Trump’s domestic agenda before the upcoming holiday weekend.

The effort is proving challenging, as both moderate and conservative Republicans have expressed concerns. Moderates are troubled by the expanded cuts to Medicaid — a change made in the Senate — while conservatives are alarmed by the increased deficit spending also introduced by the Senate. These divisions threaten the bill’s passage, as the GOP holds only a slim majority in the House, necessitating nearly unanimous support from the party.

Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, expressed skepticism about the bill: “If you look at the totality of this, I don’t believe this delivers what the president, what the administration, were working to deliver on,” he said, indicating ongoing efforts to manage deficit spending.

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson of Louisiana and other GOP leaders are racing against time to consolidate support for the bill. The legislation is critical to Trump’s second-term agenda, comprising sweeping tax cuts, a hardline stance on immigration, a shift away from green energy policies, and substantial reductions in federal health and nutrition programs.

House GOP members, from moderates to hard-liners, originally cautioned against a bill changed by the Senate that could be perceived as “worse.” They now face a difficult choice: abandon their initial stance to deliver a victory for Trump, or maintain their position and risk defeating the bill.

Echoing the internal struggle, a moderate House Republican remarked to The Hill, “Maybe I’ll get lucky and have a rough enough landing or something that I’m unable to make [it] to D.C. for a few weeks,” underscoring the challenge of their predicament.

Adding to the pressure, former President Trump is strongly advocating for the bill, warning House Republicans of potential primary challenges if they oppose the legislation he terms the “big, beautiful bill.” This is not an idle threat; Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who opposed the House version, has been targeted by a MAGA-super PAC, and Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina faced backlash from Trump, leading to his announcement of retirement after the current term.

While Democrats cannot block the bill, they are underscoring its most controversial elements, like significant cuts to low-income health and nutrition programs — proposals aimed at funding the Republican tax cuts. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries criticized the bill, saying, “This bill won’t make life more affordable for the American people. It will make life more expensive.”

The timeline for passing the legislation adds another layer of complexity. Johnson and GOP leaders aim to meet a self-imposed deadline of July 4, requiring swift action from lawmakers.

Despite the tight timeline, there is skepticism about meeting this goal. Conservatives and moderates alike have voiced concerns about increased national debt and deficits, complicating efforts to consolidate support. Rep. Marlin Stutzman of Indiana stressed the need to ensure the bill is more fiscally responsible for future generations.

On Tuesday, the House Rules Committee held a meeting as the first step in the legislative process. Subsequent actions include convening the House to debate and vote on procedural rules before deciding on the legislation. However, progress is already facing hurdles; Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland, head of the Freedom Caucus, intends to vote against the procedural rule, jeopardizing the bill’s advancement.

Trump continues to push the bill, praising the Senate’s approval and urging the House to follow suit, highlighting its significance. A senior White House official stressed the urgency of passing the bill in its current form before July 4, dismissing any notion of conferencing the House and Senate versions.

As the deadline looms, the White House is intensifying efforts to rally support, with top officials engaged in outreach to ensure the bill’s passage.

Source: Original article

Zohran Mamdani’s Mayoral Win Inspires Over 6,000 Young Leaders

Zohran Mamdani’s victory in the Democratic primary for New York City Mayor has sparked an unprecedented wave of political engagement, with over 6,000 young Americans signing up to run for office through Run for Something within a week.

In the aftermath of Zohran Mamdani’s historic win, a significant political shift is underway. Mamdani, who recently secured a victory in the Democratic primary for New York City Mayor, has inspired a wave of political interest among young Americans. In just one week, more than 6,000 individuals have expressed their intention to run for office via the organization Run for Something, marking the largest surge of candidate interest since the group’s establishment in 2017.

Amanda Litman, co-founder and President of Run for Something, emphasized the broader implications of this development. “This isn’t just a moment—it’s a movement,” she stated. “Zohran’s victory wasn’t just a win for New York City — it was a clarion call to aspiring changemakers everywhere that our time to lead is now.” The fact that so many young people are eager to take steps toward leadership indicates a significant generational shift in American politics.

Mamdani’s campaign managed to strike a chord with voters, particularly the youth, due to its strong emphasis on key issues such as affordable housing, public safety, transportation, and the cost of living. His grassroots approach and genuine connection with the public, combined with his disregard for traditional political pathways, attracted the support of those who often felt alienated or disenchanted by the political process.

His unexpected triumph over a well-established incumbent has not only transformed New York City’s political landscape but is setting a precedent for a new wave of leaders determined to challenge entrenched powers across various levels of government.

In response to this surge of political enthusiasm, Run for Something is actively ramping up its efforts. The organization specializes in recruiting and supporting young, diverse progressives to pursue political careers. Many of the recent sign-ups have no previous experience in running for office, but with access to tailored resources, coaching, and training sessions, Run for Something aims to cultivate these burgeoning leaders’ capabilities to convert their passion into tangible political influence.

“This isn’t just about running,” Litman added. “It’s about building sustainable leadership pipelines in communities that have been historically shut out of the political process.” The structured programs offered by Run for Something include political education, campaign logistics, and mentorship to ensure new candidates are well-prepared for the road ahead.

This surge is part of a larger trend that has been building momentum since the 2024 presidential election. Major national issues, including the controversial federal budget compromise and significant layoffs of federal employees, have heightened the call for political change at local and state levels. Since 2024, over 55,000 individuals have reached out to Run for Something, showing more interest in running for office than the combined inquiries received during the organization’s first three years. As of now, their candidate pipeline exceeds 215,000 potential political aspirants nationwide.

The current wave of interest is not only noteworthy for its size but also for its diversity and deep roots in community service. Many of those considering candidacy come from sectors such as education, organizing, health care, and environmental justice. They are motivated not just by the desire to hold office, but by the ambition to redefine leadership.

As Zohran Mamdani gears up for an anticipated general election campaign, his influence continues to extend far beyond New York City. Far from waiting for permission, the new generation of leaders is actively seeking to secure their spots on the ballots, signaling a transformation in the political landscape.

According to India New England News, this movement is a significant signal of change in America’s political fabric.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Lawmakers Criticize Senate Passage of GOP Budget Bill

Indian American lawmakers have expressed strong disapproval following the U.S. Senate’s passage of a Republican-led budget proposal that aims to significantly alter federal spending, including deep cuts to healthcare and social safety net programs while increasing funds for military and immigration enforcement.

On July 1, the U.S. Senate passed a controversial budget package that has stirred significant opposition from Indian American members of Congress. The proposal, led by Republicans, has come under fire for significant cuts to federal healthcare programs and social safety net initiatives while allocating more resources to military and immigration enforcement.

Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) criticized the Senate bill’s journey through Congress, stating, “The House Republican version of the Trump budget was already a disaster for the American people. The Senate somehow made it even worse.”

Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) described the Senate’s amendments to the budget as “selfish, cruel and expensive,” particularly criticizing the healthcare provisions. She noted, “Senate Republicans just voted to cut healthcare for millions of Americans to pay for a tax break for the rich. Americans will die so that billionaires can get a tax cut.”

Other lawmakers, including Representative Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA), weigh in on the matter, asserting that the current bill compounds the shortcomings of the original proposal. “Old version: slashed Medicaid, cut clean energy, exploded the debt. New version: slashes more Medicaid, cuts more clean energy, raises the debt even more,” said Subramanyam. He also emphasized that “Nearly 17 million Americans are projected to lose their health insurance because of the Trump Administration’s Big Ugly Bill.”

Representative Shri Thanedar (D-MI) warned of the severe implications for food security and health coverage, stating, “This bill will take food off the table of 2 million Americans and take away access to healthcare from 16 million more,” continuing, “All to give billionaires yet another tax cut. I’m heading to DC right now to vote HELL NO on this Big Ugly bill in the House.”

Echoing this sentiment, Representative Ami Bera (D-CA) underscored that Democrats are in solidarity against the bill. “House Democrats stand united against this harmful bill that will strip at least 16 million Americans of their health care. We must defeat this,” he stated.

The Senate vote was narrowly split at 51-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote after three Republicans—Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine, and Rand Paul of Kentucky—sided with all 47 Democrats in opposing the bill.

Next, the budget bill will be reviewed by the House of Representatives, where Republicans maintain a slim majority of 220-212, making the outcome uncertain. House Democrats are anticipated to stand unanimously against the measure.

Stepping up efforts for its enactment by the Fourth of July, President Trump is expected to take a prominent role in convincing House Republicans to pass the bill.

According to New India Abroad

Source: Original article

Tina Shah Announces Congressional Run in New Jersey’s 7th District

Dr. Tina Shah, a physician and former White House advisor, has announced her candidacy for Congress, aiming to reform healthcare and challenge Rep. Tom Kean Jr. in New Jersey’s 7th District.

Dr. Tina Shah, a prominent intensive care physician of Indian origin from Westfield, New Jersey, officially launched her congressional campaign on July 1. The Democrat is targeting a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, representing New Jersey’s 7th District, which is currently held by Republican Rep. Tom Kean Jr. Shah’s campaign focuses on healthcare reform, leveraging her extensive medical background and expertise.

Shah is no stranger to the political landscape, having served as a White House advisor. Her candidacy is set against the backdrop of a district that tilted towards President Joe Biden in 2020 but supported Donald Trump in the subsequent 2024 election cycle. This swing district presents both challenges and opportunities for Shah as she seeks to unseat an incumbent preparing for a third term.

A native of New Jersey, Shah boasts impressive credentials in the medical field. She is triple board-certified in internal medicine, pulmonology, and critical care. Her professional work is centered at RWJ Barnabas Health, where she continues to influence patient care and healthcare policy. Shah has gained national recognition as a healthcare expert, often appearing on television to provide insight into various public health issues.

The 7th District race promises to be closely watched as Shah campaigns on a platform of healthcare reform, highlighting her plans to address systemic issues within the current medical system. Her expertise and experience are expected to be central themes of her campaign as she aims to resonate with voters concerned about healthcare accessibility and quality.

According to New India Abroad, Shah’s announcement sets the stage for a competitive electoral contest in New Jersey, bringing healthcare to the forefront of the political conversation.

Source: Original article

Manjusha P. Kulkarni and Priyamvada Natarajan Chosen for ‘Pride of America Award’

Celebrating Indian American Excellence Among 2025 Carnegie Honorees

Every year, the United States pauses to shine a spotlight on the remarkable achievements of immigrants who have shaped the nation’s story. One of the most prestigious recognitions in this sphere is the “Pride of America Award,” an honor bestowed upon distinguished naturalized citizens who have made extraordinary contributions to American society.

Organized by the Carnegie Corporation of New York, this annual tradition—now in its nineteenth year—celebrates the enduring power and promise of immigration. During a solemn ceremony, this esteemed accolade was conferred upon 20 exceptional individuals hailing from 16 different countries. The award spotlights individuals whose work uplifts and advances equity, inclusion, and visibility across sectors.

Two stellar representatives of the Indian American community, Manjusha P. Kulkarni and Priyamvada Natarajan, were named to the “Great Immigrants, Great Americans” list, a testament to their dedication, leadership, and transformative impact.

Manjusha P. Kulkarni: Champion of Justice and Equity

Born in India and raised in the United States, Manjusha P. Kulkarni has emerged as a formidable advocate for social justice, equity, and civil rights. As the Executive Director of the AAPI Equity Alliance, Kulkarni leads one of the most influential organizations representing the interests of 1.6 million Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in Los Angeles County. In this role, she has been a relentless voice for marginalized communities, working to advance policies and programs that dismantle systemic barriers and foster inclusion.

Kulkarni’s commitment to justice extends far beyond organizational leadership. She is a co-founder of Stop AAPI Hate, the largest reporting center in the United States dedicated to addressing hate incidents targeting Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. Under her guidance, Stop AAPI Hate has played a critical role in documenting, analyzing, and responding to the alarming surge of anti-AAPI sentiment and violence in recent years. Her tireless efforts have not gone unnoticed: in addition to being named one of TIME magazine’s 100 Most Influential People in the World, Kulkarni received the highly regarded James Irvine Leadership Award in 2024, recognizing her visionary leadership and steadfast advocacy.

Priyamvada Natarajan: Trailblazer in Astrophysics

Priyamvada Natarajan’s journey from Tamil Nadu, India, to the upper echelons of American academia is a story of intellectual brilliance and scientific discovery. After moving to the United States to pursue higher education, Natarajan established herself as one of the world’s leading astrophysicists. She is currently a professor of astronomy and physics at Yale University, where her groundbreaking research explores the most profound mysteries of the universe: dark matter, dark energy, and black holes.

Natarajan’s pioneering work has significantly advanced our understanding of the cosmos, earning her numerous accolades and fellowships. Among her many honors are the Emeline Bigelow Conland Fellowship, the respected Guggenheim Fellowship, and the coveted 2025 Dannie Heineman Prize. In 2024, she joined the ranks of TIME magazine’s 100 most influential people, a fitting recognition for a scientist whose curiosity and expertise continue to expand the horizons of human knowledge.

A Moment of Pride for the Indian American Community

The recognition of Manjusha P. Kulkarni and Priyamvada Natarajan by the Carnegie Corporation of New York is a source of immense pride for the nearly five million people of Indian origin living in the United States. Their induction into the elite circle of “Great Immigrants, Great Americans” will take place on July 4th, coinciding with America’s Independence Day—a symbolic reminder of the ideals of freedom, opportunity, and pluralism that define the nation’s character.

Their stories, rooted in perseverance and the pursuit of excellence, are a beacon for aspiring immigrants across the world. By honoring these two exceptional women, America not only acknowledges their individual achievements but also reaffirms its enduring belief in the transformative power of diversity and inclusion. As their names join the historic roster of honorees, Kulkarni and Natarajan stand as living testaments to the promise of the American dream.

Honoring the Legacy of Indian American Achievement

The inclusion of Kulkarni and Natarajan in the 2025 cohort continues a proud tradition of Indian-origin individuals receiving this distinguished honor. In 2024, the award celebrated four such luminaries: Nobel laureate and economist Abhijit Banerjee; Dr. Ashish Kumar Jha, a leader in public health; Premal Shah, a visionary in social entrepreneurship; and Eboo Patel, a prominent interfaith advocate. These trailblazers joined an illustrious group of previous honorees, including Gita Gopinath, the former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund; Kamlesh Lulla, a renowned NASA scientist; Dr. Vivek Murthy, former U.S. Surgeon General; Pulitzer Prize-winning author Siddhartha Mukherjee; Santanu Narayen, CEO of Adobe; and Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet. Their stories embody the spirit of innovation, resilience, and community service that has long defined the immigrant experience.

Rashmika Mandanna, Vijay Deverakonda to Join India Day Parade

This year’s India Day Parade in New York will feature film stars Rashmika Mandanna and Vijay Deverakonda as part of the 43rd Independence Day celebrations on August 14.

Film stars Rashmika Mandanna and Vijay Deverakonda are set to take part in the 43rd India Day Parade in New York on August 14, marking a highlight of this year’s Independence Day celebrations. Preparations for this significant event were discussed at a meeting held by the Federation of Indian Associations (FIA) at the Indian Consulate.

The meeting commenced with a solemn tribute to the victims of the terrorist attack in Pahalgam and the Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad.

Adding to the celebratory atmosphere, large LED displays showcased images of Rashmika, known as “India’s beloved actress,” and Deverakonda. These images were accompanied by welcoming messages in multiple languages, including Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Kannada, and English.

During the preparations, Consul General Binaya S. Pradhan emphasized the FIA’s role in preserving the Indian-American identity, further underscoring the cultural significance of the parade.

This year’s parade is supported by title sponsor CrickMax Connect, whose CEO, Vinay Bhimjiani, revealed ambitious plans to elevate the popularity of cricket to that of soccer in the U.S. As part of these efforts, a celebration on July 14 at the Los Angeles Coliseum will commemorate cricket’s inclusion in the 2028 Olympics.

Dr. Atul Rai, CEO of USA Cricket, mentioned that this year’s theme centers around the impact of sports in nation-building.

FIA President Saurin Parekh announced that the official theme for this year is “Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah,” which translates to “May all be happy.”

Joint Treasurer Harish Shah also noted that the Indian flag will be hoisted at Times Square on August 15, and the Empire State Building will be illuminated in tricolor lights to celebrate Indian Independence Day.

Indian Film Stars to Head FIA India Day Parade

The Federation of Indian Associations (FIA-NY-NJ-CT-NE) launched its 43rd India Day Parade with announcements highlighting cricket’s potential in America and the involvement of top Bollywood stars.

The Federation of Indian Associations (FIA-NY-NJ-CT-NE) recently kick-started the countdown to its 43rd India Day Parade with an event held at the Indian Consulate in New York. The curtain-raiser began with a tribute to the victims of the Pahalgam terrorist attack and the Ahmedabad plane crash.

The event was marked by ambitious announcements that set the stage for the upcoming parade, including the revelation of who would lead this year’s celebration, scheduled for August 14. Indian film icons Vijay Deverakonda and Rashmika Mandanna, affectionately known as India’s “National Crush,” will serve as Co-Grand Marshals. They greeted the audience via a pre-recorded video message in multiple languages—Hindi, Telugu, Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam, and English—culminating with the phrase “Jai Hind!”

Consul General of India in New York, Binaya S. Pradhan, hailed the FIA’s lasting impact on the Indian-American community. “For half a century, the Federation of Indian Associations has been a force-multiplier for India’s image in America,” he remarked, emphasizing the need for FIA to copyright its signature events for potential replication globally. Deputy Consul General Vishal Jayesh Harsh also lauded FIA’s innovative spirit, remembering last year’s Chandrayaan-3 and Ram Mandir floats.

Cricket’s Bold Entry into America

In a gesture signaling a major shift in American cultural dynamics, Vinay Bhimjiani, CEO and founder of Cricmax Connect, announced that his company would be the title sponsor for this year’s Indian Independence celebrations. Bhimjiani’s vision is to integrate cricket deeply into American culture within the next decade. “Major League Cricket is only in its third season and already boasts investments from giants like Microsoft and the IPL franchises KKR and CSK,” he said. He announced a July 14 exhibition match at the L.A. Coliseum as a preview of cricket’s inclusion in the 2028 Olympics.

During the parade on August 14, attendees can experience an interactive cricket session through a mini-pitch set up on Madison Avenue. Cricmax’s new app will offer real-time stats and coaching tips, further enhancing this immersive cricket experience.

USA Cricket CEO Dr. Atul Rai joined Bhimjiani on stage, highlighting their partnership as “nation-building through sport.” He urged U.S. cities to adapt baseball diamonds for cricket use, observing that cricket is already the world’s second-most popular game and expressing a desire to elevate its status in the U.S.

FIA President Saurin Parikh introduced the parade’s central theme, “Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah”—A Global Initiative for Universal Well-being. “This is a healing message in turbulent times,” he explained, as a poster adorned with mandalas and peace symbols was unveiled.

In a move to promote inclusivity, ethnic associations are invited to participate in the parade without any fee, a first in the event’s history. “This parade isn’t pay-to-play; it’s pride-to-participate,” Parikh emphasized.

Chairman Ankur Vaidya paid homage to the late Chairman Emeritus Ramesh Patel, reinforcing the message that the event belongs to the community. Vaidya outlined new collaborations, while mentioning a post-parade gala at Cipriani Wall Street as part of these efforts.

The FIA Executive Committee provided updates on the parade’s extensive scale. Immediate Past President Dr. Avinash Gupta encouraged subscriptions to the Diaspora Bi-Weekly newsletter. Joint Treasurer Haresh Shah confirmed that the Empire State Building would be lit in India’s tricolor on August 15 alongside a flag-hoisting at Times Square. Joint Secretary Mahesh Dubal noted the event’s growing inclusivity with participation from various global Indian communities.

Vice President of FIA, Deepak Goel, identified the participation of Guyanese, Mauritian, and Réunion Island groups, highlighting India’s global identity. Executive VP Smita Miki Patel revealed plans for a series of youth performances themed around wellness, while Priti Ray Patel, another Vice President, previewed a culturally rich post-parade gala.

Manan Saxena, the Gala Convenor, spoke of merging traditional and modern elements in the gala, which promises expansive, Instagram-worthy culinary displays. Amit Verma, Country Head of State Bank of India (USA), reflected on the bank’s long-standing relationship with FIA since its formation in 1970.

With the integration of cricket and the confirmed presence of Bollywood stars, FIA envisions the 43rd India Day Parade as a notable cultural and sporting event. Madison Avenue is set to resonate with the spirit of India through vibrant displays of tricolor flags, dances, costumes, and music.

Source: Original article

Spain and England Experience Hottest June Amid European Heatwave

Spain and England experienced their hottest June on record, as a severe heatwave gripped Europe, impacting daily life and leading to widespread concerns about climate change.

Spain and England have recorded their hottest June ever, as blistering temperatures continue to affect Europe. According to Aemet, Spain’s weather service, June’s average temperature was an unprecedented 23.6C (74.5F), surpassing records typically seen in July and August.

The situation is similar in England, where the Met Office reported that June’s mean temperature hit a record 16.9C, making it the hottest June since monitoring began in 1884. The UK as a whole recorded its second warmest June on record, with a mean temperature of 15.2C, only surpassed by June 2023 which saw 15.8C.

In Portugal, a daily high of 46.6C was recorded in Mora, exceeding the national June record. The country’s monthly average data has yet to be finalized.

The extreme weather has had severe consequences. In Turkey, tens of thousands of residents were evacuated as wildfires swept through several provinces, causing significant damage and prompting emergency responses. Two separate heat-related fatalities were reported in Italy.

Meanwhile, night-time temperatures remained high across Spain, with Seville and Barcelona registering 28C and 27C, respectively. The UK recorded its hottest day of the year with 34.7C in St James’s Park, London, after seeing 33.1C at Heathrow Airport the previous day. Wimbledon experienced its hottest opening day with 32.9C.

In France, the heatwave prompted red alert warnings across Paris and 15 other regions, leading to the closure of nearly 1,896 schools and colleges. At Paris Orly airport, the temperature reached 37.6C. The intense heat also led to the closure of the Eiffel Tower.

Italy’s Tuscany region reported a 20% increase in hospital admissions, and work hours were adjusted to avoid the hottest part of the day. In Florence, a temperature of 38.9C was recorded, while Cagliari in the south reached 38.6C. In Greece, temperatures approached 40C, causing wildfires in coastal areas near Athens. Similarly, Germany’s Rivalling heat forced a warning as temperatures neared 38C, affecting the Rhine River’s shipping capacity due to lower water levels.

The heatwave also had environmental impacts. The Adriatic Sea’s rising temperatures accommodated invasive species like lionfish and stressed shrinking alpine glaciers. In the Balkans, intense heat led to cooler conditions; however, wildfires persisted in Montenegro.

The United Nations’ Human Rights Chief, Volker Turk, highlighted the heatwave’s alarming implications, stressing the urgent need for adopting climate-friendly practices. Rising temperatures, floods, and droughts pose threats to public health and environmental sustainability. According to the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, human activity is intensifying heatwaves which are expected to become more severe with ongoing global warming.

Richard Allan, Professor of Climate Science at the University of Reading, explained that greenhouse gas accumulation is making it more challenging for Earth to shed surplus heat, resulting in escalated heatwave intensity.

As Europe faces one of its hottest summers, the impact of climate change becomes increasingly visible, urging collective action towards sustainability and environmental consciousness.

Source: Original article

Elon Musk Plans for More Children to Support Humanity

Billionaire Elon Musk is reportedly negotiating secret agreements to expand his family, with claims suggesting he offers financial incentives to women to bear his children, according to a recent Wall Street Journal report.

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, is under scrutiny following allegations that he is expanding his family through secret arrangements and financial incentives. According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, Musk has at least 14 children with four women and is believed to be actively seeking more.

The allegations surfaced after conservative influencer Ashley St. Clair claimed Musk offered her a substantial financial package to keep silent regarding their child, born in September 2024. St. Clair asserts that Musk initially provided a one-time payment of $15 million and $100,000 monthly in child support, contingent on her silence—a condition she ultimately refused.

The paternity of St. Clair’s child, named Romulus, was confirmed through a court-ordered test showing a 99.9999% probability that Musk is the father. Nevertheless, Musk has yet to publicly recognize the child. St. Clair explained that she had to persuade Musk to agree to the paternity test, which was the focal point of legal proceedings.

Musk’s reaction to the Wall Street Journal’s report was to downplay it on social media, tweeting, “TMZ >> WSJ,” comparing the newspaper unfavorably with a celebrity gossip outlet. Nonetheless, the report has drawn significant attention, indicating that Musk’s known offspring count might be much greater than previously acknowledged.

In a detailed account, St. Clair recounted a New Year’s encounter on the island of St. Barts where she reportedly informed Musk of her ovulatory timing, to which he responded enthusiastically. After their son’s birth, Musk’s financial manager, Jared Birchall, allegedly modified the financial deal after St. Clair refused to sign a confidentiality agreement. Subsequently, her monthly child support decreased to between $20,000 and $40,000.

St. Clair claims Birchall warned her against pursuing legal action, suggesting that it would lead to a worse outcome for her than accepting the nondisclosure terms. Meanwhile, her accumulated legal costs in the paternity and custody dispute with Musk have exceeded $240,000.

The Wall Street Journal report elaborates on Musk’s broader familial ambitions, noting claims that he is actively seeking potential mothers via X, a social media platform he owns. Musk’s purported outreach extends to other influencers like Tiffany Fong, a cryptocurrency advocate, whom he reportedly approached with a proposal for surrogacy. Fong, however, declined the proposition and shared the encounter with friends, including St. Clair.

Musk, who has consistently advocated for increased birth rates, has previously commented on global population issues. During a conference in Saudi Arabia last year, he suggested that low birth rates pose a significant threat to civilization, urging countries to view it as a primary concern.

His current children include X Æ A-Xii, Exa Dark Sideræl, and Tau Techno Mechanicus with the artist Grimes; Strider, Azure, Arcadia, and Seldon Lycurgus with Neuralink executive Shivon Zilis; and twins Vivian Jenna Wilson and Griffin, and triplets Kai, Saxon, and Damian with ex-wife Justine Musk.

This extraordinary tale highlights Musk’s ongoing influence and controversial pursuits, emphasizing his belief in bolstering the human population amid worries about declining birth rates.

According to The Wall Street Journal.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Birthright Citizenship View Contradicts Historical Facts

The Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, long interpreted to grant birthright citizenship to immigrant children born in the U.S., has become a focal point of debate following President Donald Trump’s remarks questioning its applicability.

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” This opening line of the Fourteenth Amendment has been traditionally understood by legal scholars as conferring citizenship on anyone born on U.S. soil, including the children of immigrants. However, President Donald Trump recently challenged this interpretation, claiming the amendment was intended only for descendants of enslaved individuals.

During a press conference celebrating a Supreme Court decision that partly allows the administration to push forward with ending birthright citizenship, Trump asserted, “This had to do with the babies of slaves.” While the ruling addressed lower courts’ limits to block the policy nationwide, Trump’s larger legal goal faces further challenges. He insists the framers of the amendment never intended it to apply to immigrant children.

The Fourteenth Amendment, indeed, was primarily drafted to secure rights for formerly enslaved people, as the post-Civil War era saw ex-Confederate states enacting laws severely restricting the freedoms of newly freed Black Americans. The Black Codes, as they were known, effectively sought to maintain slavery in all but name through restrictive regulations on labor, property ownership, and other civil rights.

To counteract these abuses, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 over President Andrew Johnson’s veto, granting rights and citizenship to Black residents in the South. Recognizing these protections might not endure under changing political climates, lawmakers sought to enshrine them constitutionally in the Fourteenth Amendment.

Trump’s objections rest on two points: an interpretation of the amendment’s phrasing around jurisdiction and a belief that it was never intended to cover immigrant children. Critics of Trump’s perspective point to the framers’ intentions as evidence against his claims.

Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan, who drafted the amendment’s language, articulated its purpose was to declare that every person born in the U.S. was a citizen. He clarified, however, that the provision did not apply to children of foreign diplomats, indicating that other immigrant groups were included.

This understanding is further illustrated during Senate debates. Senator Edgar Cowan of Pennsylvania expressed fears that the amendment would lead to demographic upheaval by granting citizenship to immigrant children. His concerns, voiced during discussions, were especially focused on the Roma community in Pennsylvania and Chinese immigrants in California. However, Senator John Conness of California defended the amendment, stating it would rightfully include children of Chinese immigrants.

Though Cowan’s apprehensions highlighted racial and ethnic biases of the time, the broader consensus among the amendment’s supporters, both then and in judicial interpretations such as the 1898 United States v. Wong Kim Ark decision, was that birthright citizenship was meant for all born on U.S. soil, regardless of parental nationality.

The Supreme Court in Wong Kim Ark upheld that individuals born in the U.S. to immigrant parents were citizens, setting a crucial precedent that remains today. Despite Trump’s stance, the recent court decision did not directly support his interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Rather, it addressed procedural aspects, limiting lower courts from issuing broad injunctions, effectively opening pathways to potentially uneven application across states.

Trump’s reading challenges the way millions of American families of European descent historically acquired citizenship. While current debates center on Asian or other non-European immigrant communities, European immigrants benefited from broad interpretations of existing laws. The framers focused then on the citizenship eligibility of Asian immigrants, not Europeans, under the original 1790 Naturalization Act provisions.

If Trump’s interpretation prevailed, the American identity and citizenship path for many with immigrant ancestors would be in question. The historical record, however, underscores a longstanding recognition of birthright citizenship as foundational to America’s national identity, bridging diverse origins under one citizenry.

Legal experts assert that the history is clear: the Fourteenth Amendment’s birthright citizenship clause was intended to be inclusive. Originalism, a judicial philosophy favored by conservatives, emphasizes interpreting the Constitution as understood at its inception, and within this framework, the historical context affirms the broader application of the citizenship clause.

For now, as legal battles continue, the understanding established since 1868 – that birthright citizenship applies to all born in the U.S. – remains valid, although its future is potentially at the mercy of ongoing legal interpretations and political intentions.

Source: Original article

Powell: Fed Rates Unchanged This Year Due to Tariffs

The Federal Reserve would likely have lowered interest rates this year if not for significant policy changes by President Donald Trump, Chair Jerome Powell stated Tuesday.

In a central banking forum in Sintra, Portugal, Jerome Powell, Chair of the Federal Reserve, indicated that the Fed might have reduced interest rates this year had it not been for the substantial policy shifts implemented by President Donald Trump. When questioned about the possibility of rate cuts, Powell remarked, “I do think that’s right.”

So far this year, the Federal Reserve has refrained from lowering interest rates. Central bankers anticipate that Trump’s tariffs will impact the U.S. economy, prompting them to take a cautious approach, opting to monitor how these changes affect the economic landscape before making any decisions on rate adjustments.

This cautious stance, however, has drawn criticism from President Trump, who has persistently criticized Powell’s decision not to reduce rates. Trump has called Powell derogatory names such as a “numbskull” and a “moron” for maintaining higher interest rates compared to other countries.

In a handwritten note shared on his social media platform on Monday, Trump lambasted Powell, alleging that the Fed’s policies have financially harmed the United States. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that this note was delivered to the Fed on the same day.

The sentiment to cut rates is shared, albeit to a lesser extent, by others within the Fed. Two officials — Michelle Bowman, Fed Vice Chair for Supervision, and Fed Governor Christopher Waller — have opined that a rate cut could be considered as early as July. However, unlike Trump, they have refrained from advocating dramatic cuts, emphasizing that any decision should be contingent on economic conditions, specifically the severity of tariff-induced inflation.

Despite some internal support for rate adjustment, the likelihood of a rate cut in July remains slim, as indicated by futures data which estimate an 81% probability of rates holding steady at the Fed’s July 29-30 meeting, compared to a 19% chance of a quarter-point rate cut.

Powell, during his panel in Sintra, acknowledged that a majority of Fed officials foresee the necessity of reducing rates later this year, depending on inflation trends and labor market developments. He stated, “A solid majority of (Fed officials) do expect that it will become appropriate later this year to begin to reduce rates again.”

When asked about the possibility of a July rate cut, Powell refrained from giving a definitive answer, noting that he “can’t say” but would not dismiss any meeting from consideration.

European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, who was also on the Sintra panel, expressed support for Powell’s data-driven approach to policymaking and commended him for his apolitical stance. She affirmed that Powell “epitomizes the standard of a courageous central banker.”

Powell has refrained from responding to President Trump’s public barbs and reiterated his commitment to his responsibilities, stating, “I’m very focused on just doing my job.” Lagarde, when asked how she would respond to criticisms akin to those from Trump, supported Powell’s stance, suggesting, “I think we would (all) do exactly the same thing as our colleague, Jay Powell, does.”

Following Lagarde’s comment, attendees at the conference offered applause in support. Powell reiterated the Fed’s mission to maintain macroeconomic stability, emphasizing the need for a non-partisan approach, stating, “We don’t take sides. We don’t play one side against the other. We stay out of issues that are really not our bailiwick.”

Source: Original article

Senate Approves Trump Agenda Bill After Extended Voting Session

The Senate has narrowly passed President Donald Trump’s domestic agenda bill, which now moves to the House of Representatives for further approval.

The Senate passed President Donald Trump’s ambitious legislative package on a knife-edge vote of 50-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the decisive vote. This megabill represents a core component of Trump’s domestic agenda and has set the stage for a significant legislative battle as it heads to the House of Representatives.

Republican leaders in the Senate managed to secure enough votes after intense negotiations with key holdouts in their ranks. However, the next hurdle appears imminent, with GOP leaders in the House now facing a high-stakes effort to ensure the bill reaches the president’s desk by July 4.

While visiting a makeshift detention facility called “Alligator Alcatraz” in Florida, President Trump confidently predicted the bill’s successful passage in the House. He also downplayed concerns related to potential impacts on American health care coverage, which have been a point of contention among critics of the bill.

This extensive bill outlines significant tax reductions and boosts in funding for national security, all of which will be offset by the most considerable cuts to the federal safety net seen in decades. As Washington gears up for another legislative showdown, the focus now turns to the House as lawmakers evaluate the sweeping changes proposed within this multi-trillion-dollar plan.

According to CNN, the bill’s advancement symbolizes a pivotal moment in Trump’s tenure, potentially reshaping the nation’s fiscal landscape if fully enacted.

Source: Original article

Gas Vehicle Surpasses EV Leader as Best-Selling Car Worldwide

The Toyota RAV4 reclaimed its position as the world’s best-selling car in 2024, narrowly surpassing the Tesla Model Y.

In a continually evolving global car market, Toyota has managed to reassert its dominance. The Toyota RAV4 has reclaimed its position as the world’s best-selling vehicle, edging ahead of the Tesla Model Y. With this achievement, Toyota has demonstrated its resilient market strategy and extensive appeal, especially notable in a market increasingly shifting toward electric vehicles.

Toyota’s triumph is not limited to just the RAV4. The company placed five models in the global top ten, reflecting its broad appeal across multiple vehicle categories. Joining the RAV4 are the Corolla Cross, Corolla sedan, Hilux, and Camry, highlighting Toyota’s comprehensive market reach.

This 2024 ranking originates from industry analyst Felipe Munoz, who utilized a wide array of sources for his analysis. His robust methodology combines data from national statistics offices, dealership associations, customs records, specialized websites, industry blogs, and other analysts’ informed estimates. Munoz’s study encompasses 153 markets, accounting for approximately 99% of global car sales, providing an in-depth look into the automotive industry’s current landscape.

The numbers illustrate Toyota’s narrow victory with combined sales of the RAV4 and its China-market variant, the Wildlander, reaching 1,187,000 units. This slightly surpassed the Tesla Model Y’s sales figure of 1,185,000 units, marking a narrow yet significant win.

It’s notable that both models received updates shortly after the reporting period. Toyota’s RAV4 underwent a complete redesign, yet to hit the market, while Tesla has already released its refreshed Model Y, known as Juniper. Despite these updates, the Model Y retains its status as the best-selling electric vehicle, although 2025 figures suggest a potential slowdown.

The compact crossover segment continues to drive significant sales, as evidenced by the Toyota Corolla Cross, which secured third place in the rankings with 859,000 units sold. Its widespread availability across various markets contributes largely to its success. Trailing closely is the Honda CR-V/Breeze SUV, which achieved sales of 854,000 units.

Toyota’s stronghold is further solidified by the Corolla sedan with 697,000 units sold, landing it in fifth place, and the Hilux pickup with 617,000 units, in sixth place globally. Despite its aging model, the Hilux stands out as the world’s best-selling pickup, even as it is absent from North American and Chinese markets, two of the largest for trucks. In contrast, the Ford F-150 sold 595,000 units, securing the seventh position overall and placing second in U.S. vehicle sales, shadowed only by the RAV4.

Closing the top ten are sedans maintaining their relevance amidst the rising tide of crossovers and SUVs. The Toyota Camry achieved eighth place with 593,000 sales, followed by the Tesla Model 3 at 560,000, and the BYD Qin, the sole Chinese brand to make this year’s list, at 502,000. The inclusion of BYD underscores its growing influence as a competitor in both the EV and traditional combustion markets.

These figures depict a global automotive landscape where traditional manufacturers like Toyota retain significant influence while newer players like Tesla and BYD carve out substantial market niches. As the industry continues to evolve, particularly toward electrification, these dynamics will likely shift, presenting both challenges and opportunities for manufacturers worldwide.

According to Carscoops, these developments reflect the ongoing transformations within the car industry as manufacturers strive to meet changing consumer expectations and regulatory landscapes.

Source: Original article

The American Telugu Association (ATA) successfully convened its Board Meeting and Selected the Baltimore Convention Center for the 19th ATA Conference and Youth Convention.

DSC02222The American Telugu Association (ATA) held its Board Meeting on Saturday, June 28, 2025, at the APA Hotel Woodbridge in New Jersey. The event began with a devotional prayer song, followed by graceful classical dance performances. The board discussed recently conducted events, upcoming priorities, and partnerships, and approved the site and dates for the 19th ATA Conference.

Activities: During the board meeting, President Jayanth Challa highlighted several impactful initiatives that ATA has recently undertaken. These include a strategic collaboration with IIT Hyderabad to develop educational programs for students, as well as the celebration of Mother’s Day and Women’s Day across 12 U.S. cities. He also emphasized ATA’s focus on community engagement through eventsDSC02100 such as ATA Days, sports activities, 5K runs, yoga sessions, and community clean-up drives. Additionally, ATA has hosted a series of webinars addressing student concerns, health awareness, and immigration issues. Further initiatives include the launch of SAT preparation courses, IT training programs, and plans to expand health and fitness activities across multiple cities.  Looking ahead, ATA will host Start-up Cubes competitions in six major cities to promote innovation and help transform promising ideas into successful ventures. ATA is also advancing support for small businesses and women entrepreneurs, especially in the non-IT sector, through a series of awareness seminars that will guide participants from business setup to scalable operations. Further DSC02340strengthening its service efforts, ATA is partnering on clean water projects to empower NRIs to support development initiatives in their hometowns and villages across Telugu-speaking states. In addition, A presentation was given on Krishivaas, an AI-based mobile app developed by Agribridge, which aims to assist rural farmers in improving agricultural productivity while enabling NRIs to contribute toward enhancing farmer livelihoods.

Secretary and Treasurer Reports: Secretary Sainath Boyapalli and Treasurer Srikanth Gudipati presented their respective reports, along with updates from various standing and special committees. The Treasurer reportDSC02100 showcased the tradition of providing full transparency on ATA finances.

ATA Vedukalu: Seva Days in ATA President-Elect Satish Reddy announced the launch of “ATA Seva Days” in December 2025, which will culminate in the ATA Vedukalu Grand Finale on December 27, 2025, at Ravindra Bharathi in Hyderabad.

ATA 19the Conference and Youth Convention: The ATA Board unanimously approved the plan to host the 19th ATA Conference & Youth Convention from July 31 to August 2, 2026, at the Baltimore Convention Center in Baltimore, Maryland. Board members emphasized that Baltimore’s central location in the northeastern corridor makes it an DSC02055ideal choice for the convention. The event will take place under the leadership of ATA President Jayanth Challa. The ATA Board also reviewed and approved the budget for the upcoming national conference.

Appreciation to the NJ Team: The meeting concluded with warm appreciation for the New Jersey team for their excellent coordination and hospitality. ATA members and Board of Trustees from across the country participated in the event.

Attendees: The meeting was attended by President Jayanth Challa. President-Elect Satish Reddy, Secretary Sainath Boyapalli, Treasurer Srikanth Gudipati, Joint Secretary Sharada Singireddy, Joint Treasurer Vijay Reddy Thupally, Executive Director Narsi Reddy Gaddikoppula, along with members of the Board of Trustees, Kashivishwanath Kotha, Kishore Guduru, Maheedhar Muskula, Narsimha Reddy Dhyasani, Raghuveer Maripeddi, Raju Kakkerla, Ram Mattapalli, Ramakrishna Reddy Ala, RV Reddy,  Santosh Koram, Sreedhar Kanchanakuntla, Sridhar Banala, Srinivas Dargula, Sudheer Bandaru, Venkatram Reddy Ravi, Vijay Kundoor, Vinod Koduru, Vishnu Madhavaram,  Regional  Coordinators, Standing Committee Members, Advisors and Past Presidents  from various cities, who have been actively serving the community participated in large numbers.

Next Board Meeting: It was decided to conduct the next board meeting in Baltimore on October 25th, 2025.

For more information, please visit: www.ataworld.org

Justice Department to Focus on Revoking Naturalized Citizenship

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is intensifying efforts to revoke the citizenship of naturalized Americans who have committed crimes, aligning with the Trump administration’s broader immigration policies.

The recent initiative by the DOJ emphasizes denaturalization, focusing on individuals involved in activities categorized under “war crimes,” “extrajudicial killings,” “human rights abuses,” and those posing ongoing threats, including terrorism. The directive is part of a memo, urging the DOJ’s Civil Division to prioritize these cases to the full extent permitted by law and supported by evidence.

This development marks a significant escalation in the Trump administration’s immigration agenda, which seeks to target not just undocumented immigrants but also lawful permanent residents and naturalized citizens.

Naturalization is the process by which U.S. citizenship is granted to a lawful permanent resident, following criteria set by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), there were 24.5 million naturalized citizens in the U.S. in 2022, accounting for 53% of the immigrant population, based on data analyzed by the Migration Policy Institute.

The path to naturalization is rigorous, requiring individuals to be lawful permanent residents for a minimum of five years—exceptions are made for spouses of U.S. citizens and U.S. military members—and to possess proficiency in English as well as an understanding of U.S. history and government.

The shift towards increased denaturalization began under the Obama administration, as noted by Cassandra Burke Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University. The rise was due in part to improved digital tools for identifying cases of naturalization fraud. The trend has accelerated under the Trump administration, which has been actively pursuing denaturalization at unprecedented levels.

Statistics from the DOJ indicate at least 305 denaturalization cases were filed between 1990 and 2017, with the number surging during Trump’s first term. From January 2017 to August 2018, USCIS reviewed approximately 2,500 cases for possible denaturalization, referring over 110 cases to the DOJ for prosecution.

The recent memo from Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate includes denaturalization among the top five priorities for the DOJ’s Civil Division. Denaturalization is pursued in instances where individuals have allegedly obtained citizenship fraudulently by concealment of material facts or willful misrepresentation.

Concerns over the constitutional aspects of these efforts have been voiced, with Robertson arguing that civil litigation to strip citizenship may violate due process under the 14th Amendment. The DOJ’s approach allows for the potential use of denaturalization as a tool against free speech, targeting individuals and institutions for allegations ranging from antisemitism to criticism of U.S. foreign policy.

The DOJ has already denaturalized individuals in cases involving serious criminal convictions. One case involved the revocation of citizenship from a person convicted of collecting and distributing child sexual abuse material.

This DOJ initiative reflects a broader strategy by the Trump administration to leverage immigration policy as a means to address national security and public safety concerns, often amidst debate over the balance between enforcement and civil liberties.

Source: Original article

Documentary Review: “The Brown Heart” Offers Thought-Provoking Insights

Two senior doctors investigate a rising wave of heart attacks among young South Asians, aiming to uncover causes and increase awareness about this critical health issue.

“The Brown Heart” is a compelling documentary that delves into a growing health crisis: the sudden increase in heart attacks among young South Asians. Directed by a duo of Indian-origin doctors based in the United States, the film explores this unsettling trend through a combination of expert interviews and personal stories, providing both scientific insights and emotional narratives.

Over the course of more than two hours, Dr. Nirmal Joshi and Dr. Renu Joshi, who collectively bring over 70 years of medical expertise, conduct a thorough investigation spanning India, the United Kingdom, and the United States. One of the film’s early revelations comes from Dr. Devi Shetty, a highly respected cardiac surgeon, who notes a troubling reversal: it is now often the father, not the son, requiring bypass surgery. This stark observation highlights the alarming youthfulness of the victims.

Dr. Ankur Kalra, an interventional cardiologist, provides further grim statistics, citing that around 70% of South Asian heart attack deaths occur in individuals aged 30 to 60. The documentary references real-life cases, such as the untimely deaths of singer KK, actor Puneeth Rajkumar, and ten people during Garba festivities last year, adding a sobering layer to the narrative.

The filmmakers pose three critical questions: How extensive is this epidemic? Why are South Asians disproportionately affected? And most importantly, what preventive measures can be taken? Through detailed data and striking facts, the film paints a clear picture of South Asians’ heightened vulnerability compared to their white counterparts, and draws attention to India’s high rate of early cardiac deaths.

The documentary also addresses cultural misconceptions, such as ignoring early heart attack signs due to assumptions they’re just gas or acidity, which often leads to tragic outcomes. This widespread ignorance underlines the urgency of improving awareness and detection.

What makes “The Brown Heart” especially impactful is its ability to effectively communicate complex medical information in an accessible manner. While technical terms are used, the language remains straightforward, ensuring viewers can grasp the seriousness of the issue without being overwhelmed.

The film’s most profound moment arrives towards the end with a focus on diet and its dire implications. Traditional snacks like jalebi and samosa are exposed in a new, unsettling light, with trans fats—a substance often underestimated—revealed as dangerously harmful. For instance, jalebi contains 17% trans fats, significantly exceeding the WHO’s recommended limit of less than 1%, creating a chilling effect on dietary habits.

“The Brown Heart” is not a lecture; it’s an education. It delivers its message effectively enough to spark reflection and, potentially, inspire change in its audience.

According to The Times of India, this insightful documentary seamlessly blends heartfelt stories with scientific rigor, making it an essential watch for anyone concerned about health.

Source: Original article

Vismaya Mohanlal to Make Acting Debut in Jude Anthany Joseph’s ‘Thudakkam’

Vismaya Mohanlal, daughter of Malayalam superstar Mohanlal, is all set to step into the world of cinema with her acting debut in the upcoming film ‘Thudakkam’, directed by acclaimed filmmaker Jude Anthany Joseph.

The announcement was made by Mohanlal himself on X (formerly Twitter), where he shared a heartfelt message for his daughter.

“Dear Mayakutty, may your Thudakkam be just the first step in a lifelong love affair with cinema,” he wrote, tagging the team behind the film, including producer Antony Perumbavoor and Aashirvad Cinemas.

Production banner Aashirvad Cinemas, which is bankrolling the project, also took to X to officially welcome Vismaya to the silver screen.

“Aashirvad Cinemas takes immense pride and honour in introducing Ms. Vismaya Mohanlal in her silver screen debut. With hearts full of pride and eyes set on the horizon, we unveil a new voice, a fresh vision, and the dawn of a luminous new chapter.”

Known to many as a writer, Vismaya previously published a collection of poems and illustrations titled ‘Grains of Stardust’. She now follows in the cinematic footsteps of her brother Pranav Mohanlal, who has carved a niche for himself as a promising actor in the Malayalam film industry.

Producer Antony Perumbavoor, a long-time associate of Mohanlal and the head of Aashirvad Cinemas, shared a nostalgic photo of him holding Vismaya as a child, along with a blessing in Malayalam. Playing on the film’s title, which means “Beginning”, he wished her a bright start in her new journey.

“All the best, Maya Kutty!” he wrote.

Director Jude Anthany Joseph, known for critically acclaimed hits like ‘Ohm Shanthi Oshaana’ and ‘2018’—India’s official entry to the 2024 Oscars—will helm the project.

With a seasoned creative team and cinematic legacy backing her, Vismaya Mohanlal’s Thudakkam marks not just a debut, but the beginning of a new chapter in Malayalam cinema.

Tehran Refutes Trump’s Statements on Nuclear Negotiations Progress

Despite U.S. President Donald Trump hinting at a possible revival of nuclear negotiations with Iran, Tehran has categorically denied any such agreement. Iranian officials say recent U.S. and Israeli airstrikes have only deepened mistrust, making future diplomacy even more unlikely.

Following nearly two weeks of intense conflict that pushed the Middle East to the edge of wider war, Washington and Tehran are now offering starkly different narratives. While Trump suggested on June 25 that nuclear talks could resume as early as next week, Iran’s leadership rejected the claim outright, citing recent military attacks on its nuclear sites as a major obstacle.

“I want to state clearly that no agreement, meeting, or conversation has been made to start new negotiations,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on state television on June 26.

U.S.-Israel Strikes Seen as Major Setback

Araghchi argued that recent U.S. and Israeli military operations have significantly undermined the chances of any diplomatic breakthrough.

“The next negotiations won’t be easier for the Americans. Lives have been lost. You can’t simply move past that and make a deal,” he warned.

Iran Holds Firm on Nuclear Position

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei echoed that sentiment, stating that Iran’s nuclear stance remains unchanged despite what he described as the use of “naked force” against a sovereign nation.

“We’ve shown that pressure, threats, and even outright military aggression will not force Iran to give up its rights,” he told IRNA, the state-run news agency.

Accusations of U.S. Bad Faith

Baghaei also accused Washington of negotiating in bad faith, claiming the U.S. had no serious intent to reach an agreement even before the latest escalation.

“All signs indicate the Americans were never sincere. The proposed talks in Oman before the Israeli attacks prove that,” he said, adding that Iran’s engagement only served to expose “the hypocrisy and lies” of its counterparts.

No Trust, No Talks

On the matter of trust, Baghaei was blunt: “We never trusted the United States. Some say recent events have eroded trust, but there was none to begin with.”

He cited the U.S.’s history of “breaking promises” as the foundation for Iran’s ongoing skepticism.

No Timeline for Talks

Despite international appeals for restraint and diplomacy, Tehran has made clear that no timeline exists for resuming nuclear negotiations. Iranian officials say any future dialogue will face far greater hurdles than in the past.

Justice Department Intensifies Denaturalization Drive, Raising Constitutional Concerns

The Justice Department is increasingly focusing on stripping U.S. citizenship from certain naturalized Americans. According to a memo dated June 11, DOJ leadership is instructing attorneys to prioritize denaturalization in cases involving naturalized citizens who have committed specific crimes. The directive also grants U.S. attorneys more authority in deciding when to pursue such actions. This policy shift targets individuals not born in the United States, and as of 2023, nearly 25 million immigrants had obtained U.S. citizenship through naturalization.

The new emphasis on denaturalization has already produced results. On June 13, a judge revoked the citizenship of Elliott Duke, an American military veteran originally from the United Kingdom who uses they/them pronouns. Duke had been convicted of distributing child sexual abuse material, a crime they later admitted to committing even before becoming a U.S. citizen.

Historically, denaturalization was a prominent tool during the McCarthy era in the late 1940s and early 1950s. It was further utilized during the Obama administration and expanded under President Trump’s first term. The process has typically targeted individuals who concealed past crimes or affiliations with banned organizations—such as the Nazi Party or communist groups—on their citizenship applications.

In his memo, Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate emphasized the importance of this effort: “The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.”

This renewed focus aligns with the Trump administration’s broader effort to reshape the U.S. immigration system. President Trump has made immigration policy a central issue in his governance, seeking to end birthright citizenship and reduce refugee admissions. These moves reflect a fundamental redefinition of who is entitled to American citizenship.

However, constitutional scholars and immigration experts have expressed significant alarm about this denaturalization push. Cassandra Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, noted that the DOJ’s reliance on civil litigation for denaturalization raises serious concerns. In civil court, those targeted do not have the right to government-appointed attorneys, the standard of proof is lower, and cases can be resolved more quickly.

Robertson warned, “Stripping Americans of citizenship through civil litigation violates due process and infringes on the rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.”

Still, the move has supporters. Hans von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation endorsed the initiative, stating, “I do not understand how anyone could possibly be opposed to the Justice Department taking such action to protect the nation from obvious predators, criminals, and terrorists.” Regarding concerns over legal representation, he added, “Nothing prevents that alien from hiring their own lawyer to represent them. They are not entitled to have the government — and thus the American taxpayer — pay for their lawyer.”

He further argued, “That is not a ‘due process’ violation since all immigration proceedings are civil matters and no individuals — including American citizens — are entitled to government-furnished lawyers in any type of civil matter.”

Neither the DOJ nor the Trump White House commented on the matter.

The June 11 memo significantly broadens the categories of offenses that could trigger denaturalization. These include crimes related to national security and fraud against individuals or the government, such as Paycheck Protection Program loan fraud or Medicaid and Medicare fraud.

Sameera Hafiz, policy director at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, described the administration’s new approach as “very shocking and very concerning.” She stated, “It is kind of, in a way, trying to create a second class of U.S. citizens,” implying that naturalized citizens remain vulnerable to losing their status despite having followed legal processes.

Adding to these concerns, the memo grants federal attorneys the discretion to pursue denaturalization cases beyond the listed categories. “These categories do not limit the Civil Division from pursuing any particular case,” the memo reads, further noting that priorities may include “any other cases referred to the Civil Division that the Division determines to be sufficiently important to pursue.”

Steve Lubet, professor emeritus at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law, found this language troubling. “Many of the categories are so vague as to be meaningless. It isn’t even clear that they relate to fraudulent procurement, as opposed to post-naturalization conduct,” he observed.

Von Spakovsky countered that the government is right to be uncompromising. “When we extend the opportunity for naturalization to aliens, we are granting them a great privilege — the privilege of becoming a U.S. citizen,” he said. “Anyone who has abused the privilege of the opportunity of becoming a U.S. citizen should have that citizenship revoked when they engage in such reprehensible behavior.”

Lubet also pointed out the broader implications for families, particularly children who derived citizenship through a naturalized parent. “People who thought they were safely American and had done nothing wrong can suddenly be at risk of losing citizenship,” he said.

The DOJ did not address questions about how children of denaturalized parents would be affected or what would happen if individuals were rendered stateless.

The case of Elliott Duke appears to be an early example of how the new denaturalization efforts might play out. Duke, who became a U.S. citizen in January 2013, was found to have started distributing child sexual abuse material while serving in Germany in 2012. Duke relinquished their U.K. citizenship to become an American. The DOJ filed the case in February in Louisiana, citing both the prior conviction and Duke’s failure to disclose criminal activity during the naturalization process.

During the legal proceedings, Duke struggled to secure representation and could not attend court in Louisiana. “My heart shattered when I read the lines [of the order]. My world broke apart,” Duke said.

Shumate, in a statement, warned, “If you commit serious crimes before you become a U.S. citizen and then lie about them during your naturalization process, the Justice Department will discover the truth and come after you.”

Laura Bingham, executive director of the Temple University Institute for Law Innovation and Technology, cautioned that the Duke case sets a worrying precedent. “Citizenship is not supposed to be something that you can continuously open up for some people, and you can’t for others,” she said.

Historically, denaturalization surged during the McCarthy era, with over 22,000 cases filed annually. “At the height of denaturalization, there were about 22,000 cases a year… It was huge,” Robertson recalled. However, a 1967 Supreme Court ruling curtailed the practice, citing its incompatibility with democratic values.

From that point until the Obama era, denaturalization became rare. The Obama administration revived it with initiatives like Operation Janus, which sought out potential naturalization fraud, especially linked to national security concerns.

Trump’s first term saw further expansion, with a preference for pursuing denaturalization through civil rather than criminal courts. Although Robertson questions how many cases will meet the criteria outlined in the recent memo, she fears the aggressive push may target individuals with minimal infractions. “It fits in with the other ways that we’ve seen immigration enforcement happening,” she said.

This recent policy shift marks a significant chapter in U.S. immigration enforcement, raising crucial questions about due process, equal protection, and the long-term security of naturalized citizenship.

US Embassy in India Emphasizes Strict Visa Screening and Social Media Disclosure as National Security Measure

The United States Embassy in India has reiterated the stringent vetting procedures tied to its visa policies, describing each visa adjudication as a matter of national security. In a statement posted on the social media platform X, the embassy highlighted the requirement for all applicants to provide complete details of their social media presence over the last five years while applying for nonimmigrant visas.

“Visa applicants are required to list all social media usernames or handles of every platform they have used from the last 5 years on the DS-160 visa application form. Applicants certify that the information in their visa application is true and correct before they sign and submit,” stated the US Embassy in a recent post.

This disclosure requirement, according to the embassy, is an integral part of the broader national security screening process employed by the United States. Failing to comply with this requirement could have serious consequences. “Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas,” the post further warned.

This advisory is part of a broader campaign by the embassy to inform and caution visa applicants about the importance of accuracy and transparency in their applications. The embassy’s post included digital posters reiterating the security aspect of the visa process. One poster read, “Every U.S. visa adjudication is a national security decision,” and emphasized, “The United States requires visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on visa application forms. We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting.”

In a related update earlier this month, the embassy had urged applicants falling under F, M, or J non-immigrant visa categories to make their social media accounts public. This recommendation was made to aid US authorities in verifying applicants’ identities and establishing their admissibility under American law. These visa categories include F and M for students and J for exchange visitors.

The embassy elaborated that since 2019, the United States has mandated the disclosure of “social media identifiers” as part of both immigrant and non-immigrant visa applications. This long-standing requirement, according to the embassy, is vital to national security and helps immigration authorities thoroughly vet each applicant.

The embassy’s statements come amid a wider crackdown on immigration in the United States. Recently, the Trump administration intensified enforcement actions in Los Angeles, targeting immigration violations more aggressively. In light of this, the US Embassy in India has stepped up its communication, providing frequent updates on policy and legal expectations for visa applicants.

On June 24, the embassy issued another warning, stating that immigration law enforcement had been stepped up across the country. The message was unambiguous—those found violating immigration laws would face strict penalties, including detention, deportation, and permanent ineligibility for future visas.

Adding to this, the embassy’s statement noted, “The US had increased enforcement of immigration laws, and violators would face detention, deportation and permanent consequences for future visa eligibility.” The warning was not limited to overstays or misrepresentation; it also made it clear that illegal entry into the United States would result in jail time and removal from the country.

This was not the only caution issued during the month. On June 19, the embassy released another strongly worded statement reminding applicants that obtaining a US visa is not a guaranteed right but a discretionary privilege. It emphasized that screening and scrutiny continue even after a visa is issued. Authorities in the US reserve the right to revoke a visa if the holder is found in violation of any laws.

The embassy said, “A US visa was a privilege, not a right,” underscoring that post-issuance reviews are routine and can result in visa cancellation if necessary. It further added that involvement in illegal activities, including drug use or breaking US laws while in the country on a student or visitor visa, could severely impact one’s ability to receive future visas.

This line of messaging from the US Embassy in India has been consistent throughout the month. The campaign has included reminders that although the US continues to welcome legal travelers, any attempt to enter the country illegally or abuse the visa system will not be tolerated.

Reiterating this stance, the embassy made a significant statement on June 16, asserting that the United States “will not tolerate those who facilitate illegal and mass immigration to the US.” This message also revealed a policy shift: the US had introduced “new visa restrictions” aimed specifically at foreign government officials and individuals who violate immigration laws.

This multi-pronged approach by the US government reflects a broader tightening of immigration and visa processes, especially in the wake of mounting concerns around illegal immigration. With policies targeting both individual applicants and those facilitating unlawful entry, the US is sending a clear signal about the importance of legal compliance.

By highlighting these issues through multiple channels and on various dates, the US Embassy in India is working to ensure that prospective travelers are well aware of the rules and expectations. The detailed advisories, warnings about visa ineligibility, and emphasis on national security collectively serve to underline the gravity with which the US government views visa applications.

These measures not only aim to safeguard national interests but also serve as a deterrent for those considering bypassing legal immigration processes. By requiring disclosure of social media identifiers, encouraging transparency, and increasing legal enforcement, the United States is fortifying its immigration system against potential risks.

At the same time, the US government continues to stress that it welcomes legal immigration and supports those who abide by the rules. But any deviation from lawful practices will result in serious and lasting consequences.

The embassy’s message, repeated throughout June, is unambiguous: compliance with visa rules, honesty in the application process, and adherence to US laws are non-negotiable. The US authorities are equipped to detect discrepancies and enforce immigration laws without hesitation.

From urging public visibility of social media accounts to warning against drug use and law violations, the embassy has rolled out a series of reminders to leave no room for misunderstanding. These reminders serve both as guidance for sincere applicants and a deterrent for those contemplating any kind of misuse of the system.

Ultimately, the consistent tone and content of the embassy’s advisories reflect a strategic policy direction that prioritizes national security while maintaining opportunities for legal entry. Through transparency, accountability, and firm enforcement, the United States aims to maintain the integrity of its immigration system.

Shifting Social Security Rules Push Retirement Age Higher: How Americans Can Strategize Early Retirement Plans

For many years, the age of 65 has represented a symbolic point at which Americans envisioned hanging up their work boots and enjoying retirement. However, due to a series of gradual legislative changes, the Social Security system is moving the goalposts. Starting in 2025, individuals born in 1959 will reach full retirement age (FRA) at 66 years and 10 months. For everyone born in 1960 or later, the FRA will be a full 67 years. While this shift might appear minor, its financial effects are far from negligible, particularly for those considering retiring early.

These changes reflect long-term policy decisions intended to keep the Social Security system financially sustainable. Understanding how the adjustments impact benefits and creating a financial plan tailored to these evolving realities is crucial for ensuring a comfortable retirement.

Understanding the Adjustment to Full Retirement Age

The phased increase in the full retirement age can be traced back to the 1983 Social Security Amendments, which were designed to improve the program’s long-term viability. These amendments incrementally raised the FRA from the longstanding age of 65 to 67. The implementation has been gradual, increasing by two months for each birth year.

For example:

  • Those born in 1958 face an FRA of 66 years and 8 months
  • Individuals born in 1959 will reach FRA at 66 years and 10 months
  • Anyone born in 1960 or after will face an FRA of 67

Though people can start claiming Social Security as early as age 62, doing so comes with a permanent reduction in benefits. For those born in 1959, claiming benefits at 62 results in about a 29% decrease in monthly payments. The cut increases to 30% for those born in 1960 or later.

On the other hand, delaying benefits past FRA can result in an 8% annual boost, continuing until age 70. If you wait until then, you can receive up to 32% more each month. These numbers can significantly impact your long-term financial picture.

How to Handle the Income Gap Before Full Benefits

While many workers aim to retire before hitting FRA, doing so without careful planning can harm long-term financial health. Several strategies can help bridge the income gap from early retirement until full Social Security benefits become available.

One practical method is phased retirement. Instead of leaving the workforce entirely, you might negotiate a lighter schedule—working three or four days per week. Even working 15 to 20 hours weekly can help cover essential expenses and slow the depletion of your savings.

Another recommended approach is building a financial buffer. Experts advise saving enough to cover 18 to 24 months of living expenses in a high-yield savings or money market account. This safety net allows you to avoid dipping into long-term investments during volatile market periods.

Unused personal assets can also generate income. For instance, homeowners might consider renting out a spare room, potentially bringing in $700 to $1,000 per month. If you live in an urban area, leasing your driveway for parking could yield $150 to $300 per month.

There’s also the option of taking on a bridge job that offers both pay and benefits. Employers like Costco, Home Depot, and Trader Joe’s often hire part-time workers and provide health coverage for those working 20 to 28 hours weekly. These roles are especially attractive for early retirees looking for flexibility and medical benefits.

Making Withdrawals Work for You

If you retire before age 65 or delay claiming Social Security, your finances will depend heavily on personal savings. Using tax-efficient withdrawal strategies can minimize your tax burden and help your money go further.

One approach is to withdraw from taxable brokerage accounts first. This avoids early withdrawal penalties and allows retirement accounts to continue growing in a tax-advantaged environment.

You can also tap into Roth IRA contributions at any time without penalties or taxes, as long as you only withdraw the contributions and not the earnings. This provides an additional source of tax-free income.

Keeping your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) low is another valuable tactic. A lower MAGI can help you qualify for subsidies under the Affordable Care Act, which can dramatically reduce health insurance costs before you’re eligible for Medicare at age 65.

Generating Side Income Can Help Too

If you’re looking for extra income without the responsibilities of a full-time job, side gigs can offer flexibility and supplemental cash flow. Tutoring, for example, pays between $30 and $50 per hour and can be done on your schedule. Other options include pet sitting, dog walking, or selling crafts through platforms like Etsy.

Prepare for the Possibility of Future Policy Changes

Though the FRA currently caps at 67, ongoing discussions in Washington suggest it could rise further. Some proposals have floated the idea of increasing it to 68 or even 69, citing long-term funding concerns for the Social Security system. While these are not yet law, staying prepared for further changes is wise.

To stay ahead, build a plan that allows for delayed benefits if necessary. Emergency savings and alternative income sources offer greater financial flexibility. Regularly reviewing your retirement income plan will also help you adapt to any policy shifts.

Conclusion: Retirement on Your Own Terms

The gradual rise in Social Security’s full retirement age might seem like a bureaucratic detail, but for millions of Americans, it redefines when and how retirement can happen. Without planning, it can mean smaller monthly checks and more years of work. However, by strategically saving, leveraging assets, working part-time, and utilizing smart withdrawal tactics, you can take control of your financial future.

Retirement shouldn’t be defined by a government schedule. With a solid plan in place, you can retire when you’re ready—on your own terms.

By recognizing the impact of changing policies and preparing accordingly, you give yourself the freedom to shape your own retirement journey.

House Passes Bill to Deport Noncitizens Convicted of Drunk Driving

The U.S. House of Representatives on Friday passed a bill that would mandate the deportation of noncitizens convicted of driving under the influence, according to a report by Breitbart. The legislation, titled the Jeremy and Angel Seay and Sergeant Brandon Mendoza Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act, was put forward by Representative Barry Moore, a Republican from Alabama. The bill is named in remembrance of victims who lost their lives due to accidents caused by intoxicated migrant drivers.

Representative Moore introduced the legislation to honor Jeremy and Angel Seay, a couple from his district, who were tragically killed when a noncitizen driving under the influence struck them while they were riding a motorcycle. Speaking to the Alabama Daily News, Moore said, “Their lives were cut short by the senseless act.” He added, “Tragedies like this are not uncommon across this country,” emphasizing the wider impact of such incidents involving impaired driving by noncitizens.

The bill has ignited a heated debate in Congress, receiving overwhelming support from Republican lawmakers. Most Republicans view the legislation as a necessary measure to safeguard American communities from individuals who repeatedly break laws and endanger lives through reckless behavior such as drunk driving. The bill aims to amend existing immigration policy by making DUI convictions grounds for mandatory deportation.

In contrast, 160 Democrats voted against the bill, raising concerns about the potential for overly broad enforcement and its implications for immigration justice. Opponents argue that while DUI offenses are serious, automatic deportation removes the opportunity for due process or context to be considered, especially for immigrants who may have lived in the U.S. for extended periods or have deep family and community ties.

Despite the partisan split, the legislation’s passage in the House marks a significant step in the ongoing political effort to link public safety and immigration enforcement. The bill now moves to the Senate, where its future remains uncertain, particularly given the different power dynamics and legislative priorities in that chamber.

Representative Moore, in advocating for the legislation, has highlighted personal tragedies such as those experienced by the Seay family to bring attention to what he sees as preventable deaths caused by lax immigration enforcement. By attaching specific names to the bill, including that of Sergeant Brandon Mendoza, a police officer killed in a similar incident, Moore is stressing the real-world consequences of policy gaps. Mendoza’s case, like that of the Seays, has become a symbol in political discussions about the intersection of immigration and criminal law.

“Their lives were cut short by the senseless act,” Moore repeated in statements to the press, underscoring the emotional weight behind the legislation. His remarks reflect a broader Republican viewpoint that public safety should take precedence in immigration decisions, especially when there is a criminal record involved.

The bill’s language stipulates that any noncitizen convicted of driving under the influence would be subject to mandatory removal from the United States. Supporters argue that the measure closes a loophole that allows dangerous individuals to remain in the country despite endangering others through impaired driving. Critics, however, caution that the legislation could lead to disproportionate punishment and may particularly impact certain immigrant communities more heavily than others.

Immigration rights groups and some Democratic lawmakers have expressed concerns that such legislation could further criminalize immigrant populations and erode trust between law enforcement and communities. They argue that while preventing DUI-related deaths is important, a one-size-fits-all deportation policy fails to take into account rehabilitation efforts, family situations, and other mitigating circumstances.

Still, proponents believe the law will serve as a deterrent to noncitizens who might otherwise engage in reckless behavior. By introducing automatic consequences for DUI convictions, supporters contend that the law strengthens both immigration policy and public safety.

The bill’s naming after specific victims adds a human face to what is otherwise a policy discussion, which may help in gaining public support. The use of personal stories has become a common legislative strategy to create empathy and urgency around specific issues, and Moore’s bill is a prominent example.

While the political divide on immigration-related bills continues to grow, this legislation’s focus on DUI offenses could garner some bipartisan interest in the Senate, especially among lawmakers who prioritize public safety. However, it is expected that the bill will face stronger opposition in the Senate, where Democratic control and a more moderate stance on immigration issues could result in amendments or outright rejection.

For now, the bill’s approval in the House reflects a broader Republican push to tighten immigration enforcement and prioritize citizen safety, especially in cases involving criminal behavior. Whether or not this bill becomes law, it has already sparked a national conversation about how the U.S. should handle immigration enforcement in cases involving criminal activity, and how policy can be crafted to prevent further tragedies like those that took the lives of Jeremy and Angel Seay.

With its passage, the House has signaled its stance on the matter, placing the burden of next steps on the Senate. If the bill passes there, it could significantly alter how DUI offenses are treated in the context of immigration law, potentially impacting thousands of noncitizens across the country.

Until then, the debate over balancing compassion in immigration policy with accountability for criminal conduct is likely to continue, both in Congress and among the American public.

Discovery of TOI-1452 b: A Possible Ocean World Just 100 Light-Years from Earth Sparks Scientific Excitement

A remarkable exoplanet located merely 100 light-years away from Earth has caught the attention of the astronomical community. Identified as TOI-1452 b, this celestial body is not just another planet outside our solar system—it might be the first documented “ocean planet.” Scientists believe that up to 30% of this planet could be covered in water. The potential presence of such a large amount of water on a distant planet is stirring conversations about the possibility of life beyond Earth.

What makes this finding even more intriguing is the apparent contradiction between the planet’s physical characteristics and current scientific understanding. TOI-1452 b orbits a star in a zone where prevailing theories in physics and chemistry suggest that liquid water shouldn’t be able to exist. Despite this, all available data points to the possible presence of vast water reserves. As one researcher observed, “The unthinkable seems real: TOI-1452 b challenges everything we thought we knew about exoplanets!”

This potentially groundbreaking discovery has prompted many scientists to label TOI-1452 b as a kind of cosmic cousin to Earth, albeit a more distant and significantly larger one. In terms of physical features, this exoplanet has an ideal combination of properties that set it apart: low density, a balanced temperature based on the energy it receives from its star, and a substantial size.

Initial scientific assessments hint that the planet might be composed of layers of water or ice, possibly resembling the hidden subsurface oceans found on some of our solar system’s moons, such as Ganymede and Enceladus. Located in the Draco constellation, TOI-1452 b is also perfectly positioned for detailed study by the James Webb Space Telescope. The telescope is already being readied to analyze the planet’s atmosphere for any indicators of habitability—or even signs of life.

From a classification standpoint, TOI-1452 b qualifies as a “super-Earth.” Although the term may sound dramatic, it simply refers to a type of rocky planet that is larger than Earth but smaller than the gas giants such as Neptune or Jupiter. With a diameter 70% greater than Earth’s and a mass approximately five times larger, it certainly earns this designation.

What really piqued scientists’ interest was the planet’s density. Based on the numbers, something didn’t quite add up. A planet of that size and mass should be composed primarily of rock or metal, but the relatively low density pointed to another possibility. “Was it a bird? A plane? No! Water!” one scientist quipped, highlighting their conclusion that the most plausible explanation for the low density is a substantial water composition. The presence of such a significant amount of water would also explain how the planet could support potentially habitable conditions, despite its closeness to its host star.

Indeed, TOI-1452 b orbits its star in just 11 Earth days, indicating that it lies very close to the star. Under normal circumstances, a planet in such proximity would be far too hot to support liquid water. However, TOI-1452 b’s host star is not a sun-like star. It is a red dwarf, significantly smaller and cooler than our Sun. This difference may allow the planet to retain moderate temperatures, potentially supporting water in its liquid state. “Isn’t it incredible?” the article exclaims, reflecting widespread astonishment in the scientific community.

To uncover more about this strange world, all eyes are now on the James Webb Space Telescope. The plan is to analyze the exoplanet’s atmosphere as it transits across the face of its star. This method allows researchers to detect specific gases, such as water vapor or hydrogen, in the planet’s atmosphere. Scientists are even optimistic about the possibility of detecting organic molecules—biosignatures that could indicate the presence of life. Are we witnessing the first step toward discovering life beyond Earth?

The label “water world” is not given lightly. While the presence of water on TOI-1452 b has not yet been directly confirmed, the planet exhibits more Earth-like features than any previously discovered exoplanet. That alone makes it a strong candidate for the first confirmed water-covered planet outside our solar system. “We can say that TOI-1452 b is emerging as the planet with the most characteristics similar to Earth,” notes the report.

The broader scientific mission remains focused on understanding how planetary systems form and evolve. However, discoveries like TOI-1452 b inevitably turn the discussion toward the age-old question of life beyond Earth. Based on what is currently known, it’s conceivable that TOI-1452 b could support life in ways similar to Earth. Although, as the article humorously suggests, “maybe they’re not as conflictive as us humans.”

One of the most exciting implications of this discovery is what it suggests about the prevalence of habitable planets in our galaxy. If a planet so close to its star can sustain large quantities of water, perhaps the criteria scientists use to define “habitable zones” have been too narrow. Without a doubt, what stands out most about this discovery is that, if a planet so close to its star can have large amounts of water, we may have underestimated the number of habitable worlds in our galaxy!

In essence, TOI-1452 b may be more than just an exciting discovery. It could mark a turning point in the search for extraterrestrial life, redefining what scientists look for when evaluating whether a planet might support life. As technology advances and more exoplanets like this are observed, the chances of finding a truly Earth-like world—or even alien life—continue to grow.

Indian Diaspora Center Hosts 2025 Annual Diaspora Lecture on Role of Diaspora in India’s Freedom Movement

Elmont, NY – June 28, 2025 – The Indian Diaspora Center at the Dr. Thomas Abraham Library, in collaboration with Global Organization of People of Indian Origin (GOPIO) and the Indian American Kerala Cultural and Civic Center, hosted its 2025 Annual Diaspora Lecture and Interactive Session on Sunday, June 22, at the Kerala Center in Elmont, New York. The event, titled “The Role of America and the Indian Diaspora in the Freedom Movement of India,” featured a compelling presentation by distinguished author and speaker Dr. Bhuvan Lall.

Dr Thomas Abraham and Dr Bhuvan Lall in front of the Indian Diaspora Center
Dr. Thomas Abraham and Dr. Buvan Lall in front of the Indian Diaspora Center housed at the Indian American Kerala Center

The program commenced at 4:00 p.m. with a networking coffee/tea followed by Dr. Lall’s talk and discussion at 4:30 p.m. Keral Center President Alex Esthappan welcomed audience and said that the center is happy to house the Dr. Thomas Abraham Library. The evening concluded with drinks and an Indian dinner at 6:00 p.m. Attendees gathered at the Library Hall, located at The Kerala Center in Elmont, New York.

Dr. Lall captivated the audience with his vivid storytelling, shedding light on the pivotal contributions of Lala Har Dayal and the Ghadar Movement in the United States and Europe during the early 20th century.

Dr Bhuvan Lall speaking at the Annual lecture of the Indian Diaspora Center
Dr. Bhuvan Lall speaking at the Annual Lecture of the Indian Diaspora Center

 Dr. Lall stated, “According to the timeworn, intelligence reports and records locked away in the archives, Hukumat-i-Britannia considered Har Dayal the single biggest threat to the empire as long as he was alive. The origin of Britain’s MI6 was intertwined with the life of Har Dayal. Sir David Petrie, Director-General MI 5 (1941-46) & Chief of British Intelligence in India wrote, “No man in recent times has sinned more grievously against the (British) Government… than Har Dayal…” Year after year Hukumat-i-Britannia termed him as the most brilliant person born in India, the most dangerous revolutionary the British Empire had encountered in India, and the most decent human being one could meet on Planet Earth. However, despite many attempts, Hukumat-i-Britannia could never silence or arrest the phenomenon called Har Dayal.”

Dr Lall also highlighted the inspiring legacy of Subhas Chandra Bose, as the Ghadar Party morphed into the Azad Hind Fauj. He emphasized the Indian diaspora’s role in India’s struggle for independence. Attendees praised Dr. Lall’s commitment to presenting objective historical truths, and his laudatory approach to Indian history and unsung patriots.

As a token of appreciation, Dr. Lall was presented with two rare First Day Covers, canceled and released by the US Postal Service during the First Global Convention of People of Indian Origin in New York City in 1989, where GOPIO was founded. These collector’s items of US Postal Service’s First Day Covers featuring Mahatma Gandhi stamps, honored the Indian diaspora and the historic global meet.

The event was attended by community members, scholars, and notable figures, including GOPIO Chairman Dr. Thomas Abraham who chaired the meeting, GOPIO International Coordinator for North America Prof. Raj Vangapaty, GOPIO Council Chair for Seniors Mukund Mehta, Kerala Center Secretary Raju Thomas and officials pf GOPIO and Keral Center, fostering vibrant discussions on India’s freedom movement.

Speaker Dr Bhuvan Lall and Dr Aarti Lall with GOPIO and Kerala Center officials members and supporters
Speaker Dr. Bhuvan Lall and Dr. Aarti Lal Lall with GOPIO and the Kerala Center officials, members and supporters

For more information about the Indian Diaspora Center and future events, contact the Dr. Thomas Abraham Library at the Indian American Kerala Center, 1824 Fairfax St., Elmont, NY 11003, Tel: 516-358-2000.

About the Indian Diaspora Center at the Dr. Thomas Abraham Library – The Indian Diaspora Center is dedicated to preserving and promoting the history and contributions of the Indian diaspora through educational programs, cultural events, and community engagement.

About GOPIO – The Global Organization of People of Indian Origin (GOPIO) is a non-profit organization committed to fostering unity, cultural heritage, and advocacy for the Indian diaspora worldwide.

About the Indian American Kerala Cultural Center – The Kerala Center serves as a hub for cultural, educational, and community activities, celebrating the heritage of Indian Americans, particularly those from Kerala.

Dalai Lama’s Successor: A Religious Decision with Global Strategic Stakes

The selection of the Dalai Lama’s successor is not only of immense spiritual importance for Tibetan Buddhists but also a critical issue with geopolitical implications for China, India, and the United States. As the 14th Dalai Lama approaches his 90th birthday on July 6, attention is intensifying around how his successor will be chosen and who will influence the decision.

The current Dalai Lama, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, is recognized globally for his spiritual guidance, human rights advocacy, and peaceful stance on Tibetan autonomy. His influence stretches far beyond religious followers, making the process of choosing his successor a matter of worldwide interest.

Tibetan Buddhism believes that the soul of a senior monk, such as the Dalai Lama, is reincarnated after death. The current Dalai Lama, born Lhamo Dhondup on July 6, 1935, into a farming family in what is now China’s Qinghai province, was recognized as the reincarnation of the 13th Dalai Lama at just two years old. According to his official website, the decision was based on various signs observed by a search party dispatched by the Tibetan government. Among the most convincing indicators was when the young child correctly identified personal items of the 13th Dalai Lama, saying, “It’s mine, it’s mine.”

Following these events, Lhamo Dhondup was brought to the Potala Palace in Lhasa, the capital of what is now the Tibet Autonomous Region, in the winter of 1940. There, he was formally installed as the Dalai Lama, becoming the spiritual head of Tibetan Buddhists.

The question now arises: how will his successor be found? In his recent book Voice for the Voiceless, released in March 2025, the Dalai Lama made it clear that his reincarnation would be born outside China. This announcement directly challenges the Chinese government’s assertion that it holds authority over the reincarnation process. Since fleeing to India in 1959 following an unsuccessful uprising against Communist rule, the Dalai Lama has lived in exile in Dharamshala, in northern India. From there, he continues to lead and influence the Tibetan exile community.

Speaking at a gathering in Dharamshala just days before his 90th birthday, the Dalai Lama addressed the succession issue, saying, “There will be some kind of a framework within which we can talk about the continuation of the institution of the Dalai Lamas.” While he did not elaborate further, his comments suggest that preparations are underway for a structured transition.

The Tibetan parliament-in-exile, based in Dharamshala, has also indicated that mechanisms have been set up to ensure continuity. They state that while the exiled government will carry on its administrative functions, the responsibility of identifying and recognizing the next Dalai Lama will rest with officers of the Gaden Phodrang Foundation. This foundation, established by the Dalai Lama in 2015, was created “to maintain and support the tradition and institution of the Dalai Lama” in religious and spiritual matters. Its leadership includes several of the Dalai Lama’s trusted aides.

Meanwhile, China insists that it holds the right to approve the Dalai Lama’s successor, based on what it claims is a historical legacy. Specifically, China refers to a ritual from 1793 during the Qing dynasty, where names of potential successors are drawn from a golden urn. Chinese officials argue that this selection process must conform to national laws, which require the successor to be born within China and selected through the urn ceremony.

However, many Tibetans view this claim with suspicion, believing it is a strategy by Beijing to tighten its control over Tibetan affairs. The Dalai Lama himself has strongly objected to China’s involvement in the religious process. “It is inappropriate for Chinese Communists, who reject religion, to meddle in the system of reincarnation of lamas, let alone that of the Dalai Lama,” he has stated. In his book, he urged Tibetans to reject any successor “chosen for political ends by anyone, including those in the People’s Republic of China.”

Despite his message of peace and non-violence, Beijing continues to label the Dalai Lama a separatist. The Chinese government has banned public displays of his image and suppresses any visible acts of devotion toward him. In March 2025, a spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry dismissed him as a “political exile with no right to represent the Tibetan people at all.”

Beijing maintains that its policies in Tibet have brought progress and modernity, claiming that Chinese rule ended serfdom and brought development to what it describes as a backward region. However, critics argue that these claims mask systemic suppression of religious and cultural freedoms.

India, which hosts the Dalai Lama and an estimated Tibetan population of over 100,000, plays a unique role in this complex issue. Tibetan refugees in India are free to practice their religion, study, and work. The Dalai Lama is held in high regard by many Indians, and his presence in the country is seen by analysts as giving New Delhi a strategic edge in its often tense relationship with China.

The United States has also taken a strong stance on Tibetan autonomy and religious freedom. U.S. lawmakers have consistently supported the Dalai Lama’s right to determine his own successor, independently of Chinese interference. In 2024, then-President Joe Biden signed legislation aimed at pushing China to resolve long-standing issues over Tibet’s autonomy. This law was viewed as a direct signal to Beijing that Washington would not tolerate manipulation of the succession process.

In recent years, successive U.S. administrations have emphasized human rights in Tibet as a priority, and top officials have met with Tibetan leaders in exile. The bipartisan position in the U.S. Congress continues to advocate for a peaceful and autonomous Tibetan community, free from Chinese political influence.

As the Dalai Lama marks his 90th birthday, the debate surrounding his successor becomes more urgent. While spiritual in nature, the decision holds deep geopolitical weight. The coming years will determine whether the succession remains true to centuries of Tibetan Buddhist tradition or becomes entangled in the strategic contest between global powers.

Generative AI’s True Potential Lies in Enhancing Team Collaboration, Not Replacing It

The true revolution of generative AI may not be in its individual capabilities, but in how it reshapes teamwork and collaboration among humans. Rather than focusing on its potential to replace jobs or the proliferation of superficial AI-generated content online, a quieter yet more significant transformation is underway: integrating generative AI into team workflows to boost collective intelligence and create societal value.

Alongside colleagues from the Brookings Center for Sustainable Development (CSD), researchers have explored the role generative AI can play in collaborative research and insight generation for solving some of the world’s most pressing issues—such as extreme poverty, inequality, and environmental degradation. As demonstrated through the 17 Rooms initiative, these are complex challenges that no single entity can solve alone. Progress often hinges on temporary, cross-sectoral teams working together to share knowledge, prioritize efforts, and take action.

In this context, generative AI’s capabilities in natural language processing and generalized reasoning are most valuable not for improving individual outputs like cleaner writing or faster code, but for enabling teams to think collectively and design systemic strategies. This leads to a central question: how can generative AI be embedded into team interactions in a way that strengthens, rather than undermines, human collaboration?

To address this, the Brookings team has developed an experimental approach called “vibe teaming.” Developed with insights from CSD colleagues, this method incorporates AI into the collaborative process from the beginning—not as a productivity tool for individuals, but as an active participant in group problem-solving. This new approach is detailed in a working paper that aims to encourage feedback and broader experimentation over time.

Vibe teaming is inspired by the viral concept of “vibe coding,” a term coined by renowned software engineer Andrej Karpathy. In vibe coding, developers describe the desired outcomes in natural language, and generative AI handles the first draft of code. This allows developers to shift focus from syntax to strategy and iterate more quickly. As the idea evolved from coding to working, the team began experimenting with “vibe teaming”—where AI participates in the upstream phases of ideation and problem-solving, not just downstream tasks like editing or formatting.

By offloading routine work such as transcribing conversations, drafting text, and iterative revisions, AI tools have enabled teams to focus more on interaction and collaborative synthesis. This shift has enhanced both the efficiency and the creative depth of teamwork. As the authors explain, the emphasis has moved to idea generation and joint problem-solving, stretching the boundaries of team performance and thought.

To evaluate the approach, the team tested vibe teaming on a particularly ambitious and urgent challenge: eradicating extreme poverty. They organized a virtual session with Homi Kharas, senior fellow at Brookings and an expert on global poverty, to co-develop a high-level strategy for achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 1.1—ending extreme poverty by 2030.

This session followed a four-step process that has emerged as the core structure of vibe teaming:

Table 1. Four steps to vibe teaming

Step Human-AI configuration Details
1. Structured team conversation, transcribed by AI Team (Homi, Jacob, Kershlin)+AI A semi-structured team discussion with the domain expert (Homi in this instance) focused on problem diagnosis, constraint identification, and framing of strategic levers. The discussion was recorded and transcribed using AI tools, enabling a real-time capture of insights (30 minutes).
2. First draft via AI Individual (Kershlin)+AI A custom language model—primed with both the transcript and a five-part strategic framework—generated an initial draft strategy reflecting the conversation’s core themes (5 minutes).
3. Human-AI drafting Team (Jacob, Kershlin)+AI We engaged in rapid iteration with the AI model, probing the draft for feasibility, political nuance, operational logic, and communication strategy. This was a collaborative thinking process, where AI helped us test and stretch emerging insights (10 minutes).
4. Structured team review, transcribed by AI Team (Homi, Jacob, Kershlin)+AI A second discussion with the domain expert (Homi) provided both validation and further ideation. The transcript of this exchange informed revisions to the strategy and supported the development of a draft Brookings-style commentary (15 minutes).

 

 

After this, the team spent another 30 minutes refining the final document using the review transcript. In total, the vibe teaming session took around 90 minutes. Despite the short duration, the approach yielded high-quality outputs. Similar trials with other Brookings scholars—on subjects like gender equality, state fragility, and community-led development—have shown equally promising results. These experiments demonstrate the potential of a fast-paced “human-human-AI” workflow to enhance knowledge work. According to the researchers, “with vibe teaming we spend more time collaborating—brainstorming and discussing—and less time on individual tasks like transcription and drafting, compared to our conventional workflows.”

The main breakthrough was not just faster results or more polished writing, but a transformation in how the team operated. Traditional AI use often begins with minimal or generic prompts. In contrast, vibe teaming starts with rich, real-time human dialogue. This gives the AI a stronger foundation for synthesis. Throughout the process, AI catalyzed the generation of insights, but the key ideas came from dynamic human interaction and the collective reflection of the team.

Though more testing is needed, three early lessons from vibe teaming have emerged:

  1. Start with rich human context: Transcripts from live discussions among multiple team members are more effective than abstract, templated prompts.
  2. Customize and coach: Adapting AI models and prompts to specific domains helps prevent vague or overly agreeable responses, improving relevance and depth.
  3. Human review remains essential: Expert oversight is necessary to fix errors and ensure the strategic framing is as sharp as possible—something AI cannot do alone.

Despite its promise, vibe teaming introduces several risks that must be managed thoughtfully:

  • Data privacy and security: The transcription of team conversations increases the need for strong data protection policies—often beyond typical norms.
  • AI’s tendency to please: Since generative models favor conventional responses, teams must build in checks to encourage critical thinking and expert oversight.
  • Cognitive atrophy: Overreliance on AI can dull human skills in writing and argumentation, especially among junior team members or underperforming groups.

To address these risks, well-designed team practices can help. These include bias audits, roles for data stewardship, and creating a team culture that values critical questioning. As the authors point out, while “writing is thinking” remains a valid belief, vibe teaming opens new avenues for co-authoring with AI—a shift that calls for its own skillset and discipline.

As organizations across sectors adapt to a future shaped by AI, the challenge will not just be about adopting new technologies, but about redesigning how people work together. Vibe teaming offers a preview of what thoughtfully integrated human-AI collaboration can look like. As the authors conclude, this approach embeds AI from the very beginning, “not to replace human insight, but to unlock its potential.”

USCIS to Change Text Alert Number Starting July 1: Applicants Urged to Save New Contact

Beginning July 1, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will implement a significant change in how it communicates via text messages with applicants. The federal agency, which oversees lawful immigration to the United States, has announced it will discontinue its current text alert number and begin using a new one.

Until now, USCIS has sent text messages to applicants from the number 468-311, which many came to recognize as GOV-311. This number will be retired, and all future messages will instead come from the new number 872466. The numeric sequence represents USAIMM, an abbreviation for “U.S.A. Immigration.” The agency’s move aims to improve clarity and foster trust among those receiving these messages.

This transition is particularly important for applicants who rely on USCIS text updates, such as notifications about the status of their immigration cases or reminders for scheduled appointments. The agency is encouraging everyone who receives these updates to save the new number in their contacts. Doing so, they say, will help avoid misidentifying official USCIS messages as spam or fraudulent texts.

The use of text alerts by USCIS is targeted primarily at applicants who opt for electronic communication. This preference is indicated by filing Form G-1145, which allows individuals to receive notifications via text and email. The text messages typically include a receipt number and guidance on how to check the status of a case on the USCIS website.

In a statement, USCIS clarified that the reason behind the number switch is to make it easier for applicants to recognize messages from the agency. It also seeks to improve the public’s confidence in the legitimacy of the communications they receive. The agency explained: “Effective July 1, 2025, USCIS will no longer send text (SMS) messages from the phone number 468-311 (GOV-311). Our new number will be 872466 (USAIMM).”

Form G-1145, officially known as the E-Notification of Application/Petition Acceptance, plays a supportive role in the immigration application process. While it does not directly confer any immigration benefit or legal status, many applicants attach it to other USCIS forms—such as Form I-485, used for applying for lawful permanent residency—to ensure they receive prompt acknowledgment when their documents are accepted. The form provides a receipt number and directs applicants to the tools they need to track case progress online, adding convenience and assurance in a process that can otherwise feel uncertain.

USCIS’s decision to update its text message system aligns with its broader push toward improving communication and technological efficiency. The new number is intended to reflect the agency’s identity more clearly and reduce the risk of applicants missing important updates due to unfamiliar sender information.

This change to the text alert system follows another update from USCIS earlier in June, which affected all new applications for permanent residency. The agency now requires applicants to submit an updated medical examination form with each new green card application. This marks a shift from the previous policy, where applicants could reuse medical forms indefinitely. The updated requirement is part of a series of recent adjustments in USCIS procedures.

Back in March, a more abrupt change in multiple immigration application forms caused widespread confusion among applicants and immigration lawyers. The sudden implementation of new forms, without sufficient notice, led to concerns and legal action. Immigration attorneys filed a lawsuit in response, urging the agency to provide a smoother transition. USCIS responded by modifying its policy and offering at least a two-week grace period for the new forms to become mandatory, giving applicants more time to adjust to the updated requirements.

In addition to procedural updates, USCIS continues to urge applicants to be vigilant about scams. The agency emphasized that it never requests payment or passwords via text message. If an applicant receives a suspicious text claiming to be from USCIS, the advice is clear: do not respond, and instead report the message through the official USCIS website. This warning serves as a reminder that scammers often attempt to exploit applicants during periods of administrative change.

Scammers have been known to mimic official government communications, making it essential for recipients to verify the source of any message. Saving the new 872466 number in a contact list will help reduce the risk of falling victim to such frauds. Additionally, individuals should remain wary of unsolicited messages requesting sensitive information or financial transactions.

With the July 1 transition date approaching, USCIS has provided straightforward guidance: individuals who receive text updates should immediately add the new number to their phone contacts and stop responding to or expecting valid messages from the former 468-311 number. “USCIS recommends that users add the new number to their contacts and disregard any texts from the old number beginning July 1,” the agency stated.

This measure is part of the agency’s continuing efforts to modernize and streamline its services while maintaining security and transparency for applicants. As the immigration process involves numerous steps, forms, and deadlines, clear communication from USCIS plays a vital role in ensuring that applicants remain informed and compliant.

To sum up, the main takeaway for all USCIS applicants is to update their contact list with the new number 872466, stay alert for official notifications, and continue using Form G-1145 to receive electronic updates. These small but crucial actions can help applicants avoid unnecessary delays or complications in their immigration journey.

By making this simple yet impactful adjustment in its messaging system, USCIS hopes to ensure that its communications are immediately recognizable and trusted. The agency’s recent actions, including the rollout of a new number and improvements to policy transparency, reflect its broader aim of providing better service in a landscape where timely and clear communication is more essential than ever.

In conclusion, while the change may seem minor, it represents a continuing evolution in USCIS’s approach to applicant engagement. By focusing on clarity, responsiveness, and fraud prevention, the agency aims to foster a more secure and streamlined process for those navigating the complexities of the U.S. immigration system. Applicants should take note, act accordingly, and remain cautious to ensure that their interactions with USCIS remain safe and effective.

Waning Investor Optimism Dampens India’s Market Rally Amid Global Shifts

India’s stock market, which had emerged as a safe harbor when U.S. President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff hikes rattled global markets in April, is now witnessing a cooling of investor enthusiasm. The country’s relatively insulated $5.4 trillion equity market initially benefited from trade uncertainties elsewhere. However, with trade tensions easing and other Asian markets gaining traction, the motivation to hold India’s highly valued shares is diminishing.

Concerns about slowing earnings growth are taking the sheen off India’s market rally, especially as Chinese stocks listed in Hong Kong gain momentum and attract global capital. These developments come at a time when India’s markets offer limited exposure to the rapidly advancing artificial intelligence sector, making them less appealing to investors seeking growth in tech-related areas.

Together, these factors suggest Indian equities may be poised for a prolonged period of underperformance compared to their Asian counterparts. This comes after a robust four-year bull run that saw Indian shares reach record highs.

“This is not the year for India,” remarked Amol Gogate, an emerging markets fund manager at Carmignac in London. “Overall, 2025 is going to be tough as India doesn’t have a lot going for it compared with other markets such as China,” he added.

India had initially shown strong resilience to global disruptions triggered by Trump’s tariffs and was the first major economy to fully recover from the losses those policies inflicted. But in the rebound that followed the market dip in April, the MSCI India Index has lagged behind the broader Asian rally.

As the first half of 2025 comes to a close, India’s MSCI index has risen by 6.3 percent. That gain, however, falls short of the MSCI Asia Pacific Index, which has outpaced it by nearly six percentage points. Meanwhile, Chinese shares traded in Hong Kong have surged by 20 percent this year. Their ascent is largely attributed to progress in artificial intelligence and an influx of exciting new listings.

One of the major sticking points for investors looking at India is its steep valuations. The MSCI India Index currently trades at close to 23 times projected earnings, which makes it among the costliest stock markets globally. This figure is well above the five-year average of 21.5. Compounding the concern is India’s relatively modest earnings growth outlook, especially when compared to regional competitors like South Korea and Taiwan, according to Bloomberg data.

“We don’t have an overweight allocation to India and that’s mainly because of valuations,” said Jian Shi Cortesi, a fund manager at GAM Investment Management in Zurich. “We like the country for its longer-term potential but right now valuation is even more stretched than in the past,” she noted.

Despite the headwinds, some investors who focus on medium- to long-term horizons still find compelling reasons to stay optimistic about India’s prospects. The country remains the fastest-growing major economy and benefits from a robust domestic market, both of which continue to make its equity space attractive for certain players.

“We still believe in the long-term growth potential of India and usually take dips as buying opportunities for Indian stocks,” said Joohee An, chief investment officer at Mirae Asset Global Investments in Hong Kong.

Yet, recent foreign capital flows suggest that confidence is wavering. The sharp rally that took Indian markets to new highs in late September has raised alarms about stretched valuations. In response, global investors have reduced their stakes by almost $9 billion in 2025 alone. According to data compiled by Bloomberg, India is now on track to record its first consecutive year of foreign outflows since 1999.

Investor sentiment appears subdued across other financial instruments as well. The Indian rupee, for instance, has seen a minor decline against the U.S. dollar this quarter. This places it among only two Asian currencies to have weakened during the same period. In the bond market, foreign investors have pulled back significantly, reducing their holdings in Indian index-eligible debt securities by $3.4 billion since April.

“Earnings are performing in line with expectations but you need faster growth and positive profit revisions to justify continued expansion of valuation multiples,” said Alan Richardson, a senior portfolio manager at Samsung Asset Management Co. He added, “I am surprised the market even managed to recover so fast from the April lows on narratives with little change in fundamental growth.”

In essence, while India’s long-term economic narrative remains appealing, the immediate outlook has become less convincing for global investors. High valuations, tempered earnings expectations, and a lack of exposure to emerging themes like AI are diminishing its appeal relative to faster-growing or more attractively priced markets in Asia. The landscape for Indian equities in the second half of 2025 could well hinge on whether the economy can surprise investors with stronger growth or compelling sectoral developments.

Understanding the Final Shift in Social Security Retirement Age: What It Means for Future Retirees

Changes to the Social Security retirement system have not come unexpectedly. Instead, they are part of a carefully phased plan initiated in 1983 to ensure the long-term stability of the Social Security trust fund. This final phase marks the completion of a broader reform strategy intended to reflect the realities of longer life spans and shifting demographic and economic circumstances in the United States. As a result, those who are approaching retirement need to be fully aware of what these adjustments mean, particularly when it comes to the Full Retirement Age (FRA).

The Full Retirement Age is the point at which individuals are eligible to receive 100 percent of their Social Security benefits. Under the current system, individuals born in 1959 will reach their FRA at the age of 66 years and 10 months. For people born in 1960 or after, the FRA is set at age 67. This shift directly affects not only the size of monthly benefit payments but also the timing of when one should ideally start collecting them. The change in FRA is a crucial element that current and future retirees must factor into their planning.

This increase in FRA is not arbitrary but is rooted in the structural challenges facing the Social Security system. Americans are living longer than previous generations, which means they spend more years collecting retirement benefits. Without reforms like this one, the Social Security system would be under significant financial strain, potentially jeopardizing its ability to make payments to future retirees.

The importance of understanding these changes is heightened for those nearing retirement age. As reiterated, those born in 1960 or later will need to wait until they are 67 years old to receive full Social Security benefits. Opting to claim benefits before reaching that age comes at a cost. Monthly payments are permanently reduced for those who decide to start collecting benefits earlier. For example, if benefits are claimed at age 62—the earliest possible age—individuals can expect a reduction in their monthly payments by about 30 percent for the rest of their lives.

The timing of when to begin collecting Social Security benefits should be based on a mix of personal and financial considerations. For people in good health with a secure financial foundation, delaying benefits might be the more sensible option. Postponing benefits allows retirees to receive larger monthly payments for the rest of their lives. On the other hand, individuals who are dealing with medical issues or who have a shorter life expectancy may find it more beneficial to begin collecting earlier. This flexibility allows retirees to tailor their decisions based on their specific circumstances.

One of the most effective ways for individuals to navigate these changes is by staying informed and regularly reviewing their Social Security statements. These documents provide a detailed record of earnings and an estimate of future benefits, which can help in making more informed decisions. Tools like the SSA Retirement Estimator also allow users to simulate different retirement scenarios by entering different retirement ages. This helps in visualizing the financial impact of various decisions and planning accordingly.

“The increase in the FRA responds to structural needs of the system, as Americans are living longer, so retirees are collecting benefits for more years than before, and without these adjustments, the Social Security system would face severe financial pressure that would compromise future payments,” the article noted, summarizing the key rationale behind the gradual increase in the retirement age.

There’s no one-size-fits-all answer when it comes to deciding the optimal time to claim benefits. It requires a careful balance of health, finances, and life expectancy. Deciding when to claim Social Security benefits depends on personal and financial factors. If you are in good health and have a stable financial situation, it is best not to anticipate claiming benefits. While in a case with a shorter life expectancy, it may be advisable to anticipate the collection of monthly payments.

This guidance underscores the need for personalized retirement planning rather than relying on broad assumptions. The consequences of claiming too early or too late can be substantial, and every year of delay past age 62 results in increased monthly benefits—until the age of 70. Beyond that, there is no additional advantage to waiting.

Another crucial point made is about the value of the SSA tools: “It is also advisable to regularly review the Social Security statement to track income and estimated benefits. Tools such as the SSA Retirement Estimator can be used to help get an idea of how much would be received at different ages.” These resources empower individuals to take control of their retirement planning and make educated decisions that align with their long-term goals.

Ultimately, the final phase of the Social Security retirement age reform is not merely a bureaucratic update but a necessary adjustment to meet today’s economic and demographic realities. For those approaching retirement, understanding the impact of this change and using available tools to plan accordingly is critical. Retirees who take the time to educate themselves and make informed choices will be in a much better position to ensure financial stability in their later years.

The overarching lesson from these reforms is the importance of proactive planning. Whether it’s delaying retirement to maximize monthly benefits or making early claims due to personal health conditions, the decisions individuals make today will shape their financial well-being for years to come. The shift in FRA from 66 to 67 may seem small, but its impact is far-reaching. Being aware of it and understanding its consequences is the first step toward a more secure retirement.

As the Social Security system adapts to the evolving needs of the population, staying informed and making strategic decisions will be essential. The final phase of the 1983 reform serves as a reminder that financial sustainability requires forward-thinking policies—and individuals who are prepared to make the most of them.

Unshackled Conference 2025 in California to Empower High-Skilled Immigrants with Career and Immigration Insights

The India Community Center in Milpitas, California, is set to host the highly anticipated Unshackled Conference 2025 from August 15 to 16. This major event is designed specifically for high-skilled immigrants in the United States, offering them critical tools and strategies to navigate the complex American immigration system and boost their career trajectories.

Spearheaded by Greencard Inc. in collaboration with Unshackled.club, the conference is positioned as a crucial platform for immigrant professionals. It aims to bridge the gap between ambition and immigration realities through sessions focusing on innovation, career development, and policy engagement.

With attendance expected to run into the thousands, the two-day event promises an enriching experience through its three simultaneous thematic tracks—Immigration, Innovation, and Impact. Each track is tailored to address the specific needs of attendees, covering key subjects ranging from visa pathways to personal branding and entrepreneurial growth.

On the immigration front, the conference will delve deep into U.S. visa categories such as EB-1A, EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW), O-1 for individuals with extraordinary abilities, and the EB-5 investor visa program. These discussions are designed to help professionals understand their options and map out effective strategies for securing permanent residency.

The Innovation track will feature practical advice on launching startups, navigating the tech ecosystem, and identifying scalable opportunities. This section is especially beneficial for founders and entrepreneurs seeking to balance immigration constraints with their business goals.

The Impact track will shed light on how immigrants can influence grassroots policy reform and build a strong personal brand. Topics such as storytelling for advocacy and community-driven change are expected to resonate with those who want to go beyond individual success and contribute meaningfully to broader social transformations.

A strong lineup of over 40 speakers will share their expertise and experiences across these themes. Among the headline names is Vijay Amritraj, the globally renowned sports commentator, actor, and retired professional tennis player, whose diverse career will serve as an inspiration to many navigating multidimensional paths.

Joining him will be Deedy Das, a principal at Menlon Venturs known for his investment acumen; Nikita Gupta, co-founder of Careerflow.ai, whose work lies at the intersection of career development and AI technology; and Vidya Srinivasan, lead product manager at Meta, who brings a wealth of experience from the tech world.

Another highlight of the conference is the opportunity for attendees to engage in free legal consultations, a crucial benefit for those wrestling with intricate immigration issues. This legal support will be available throughout the event, making it easier for participants to get personalized advice without the usual costs and barriers.

Panel discussions are also on the agenda, featuring immigration attorneys, startup mentors, recruiters, and public policy advocates. These sessions aim to offer holistic perspectives on navigating career and immigration hurdles in tandem. For job seekers, the visa-friendly job fair promises to be a game-changer, featuring participation from more than 50 startups based in the Bay Area. This career fair is tailored to accommodate international professionals and H-1B visa holders, making it a rare opportunity to connect with employers who understand the challenges and legalities involved in hiring global talent.

Adding to the event’s richness is a unique blend of community engagement and professional insight delivered by Craig Montuori and Danielle Goldman. Both are widely recognized for their contributions to immigrant entrepreneurship and visa reform. Their sessions are expected to strike a chord with those who want to take an active role in shaping a more inclusive immigration narrative in the United States.

The entertainment segment of the conference is not to be missed either. Kenny Sebastian, a celebrated comedian with a global following, will headline the entertainment portion of the conference. His performance is set to bring much-needed comic relief and celebration to an otherwise intense and knowledge-driven gathering.

The conference is designed to cater to a wide spectrum of participants including H-1B visa holders, international students, academic researchers, startup founders, and other professionals seeking employment-based permanent residency in the U.S. By covering a broad array of subjects and offering diverse formats—legal help, job fairs, panel discussions, and entertainment—the event promises a comprehensive experience for attendees.

Registrations are currently open and those interested can sign up to secure their spots for this major two-day conference. This event is particularly significant in today’s context, where high-skilled immigrants often find themselves navigating uncertainty around work visas and green card processing delays. By bringing together experts, community leaders, and solution-oriented sessions, Unshackled Conference 2025 is set to serve as a pivotal moment of clarity, empowerment, and opportunity for thousands in the immigrant professional community.

As the conference draws near, it is clear that the organizers aim to go beyond typical networking or educational events. They intend to spark meaningful change and equip immigrants with the tools and knowledge necessary to break free from bureaucratic bottlenecks and professional stagnation.

In summary, the Unshackled Conference 2025 is not just another event on the calendar—it is a dynamic, multi-dimensional forum crafted to address the unique struggles and aspirations of high-skilled immigrants in the United States. Through its three specialized tracks—Immigration, Innovation, and Impact—it offers something of real value for every participant, whether they are at the start of their immigration journey or well on their way toward permanent residency and professional growth.

The blend of high-profile speakers, visa guidance, job opportunities, and entertainment ensures that the two-day conference will leave a lasting impact on attendees. As Vijay Amritraj and others bring their stories and insights to the stage, the event will likely inspire a wave of new momentum within the immigrant community to continue pushing boundaries and forging new paths.

Registrations remain open, and prospective attendees are encouraged to sign up early to take full advantage of the sessions, consultations, and opportunities that await at the India Community Center in Milpitas on August 15 and 16.

Wealth Gap Widens as World’s Richest 1% Control 43% of Global Assets, Says Oxfam

The wealthiest 1% of the global population now possess an astonishing 43% of the world’s total assets, with their wealth growing by almost $34 trillion over the past ten years, according to a new analysis by Oxfam International. This sharp rise in private wealth stands in stark contrast to the alarming decline in public wealth and development aid, which the report argues is fueling global poverty and inequality.

Oxfam released its report titled “From Private Profit to Public Power: Financing Development, Not Oligarchy” ahead of the International Conference on Financing for Development scheduled for June 30. The conference, hosted by Spain and attended by representatives from more than 190 countries, will focus on strategies to address the growing inequality in wealth distribution.

The Oxfam analysis draws attention to a troubling global trend: while private wealth continues to surge, public wealth has been consistently shrinking. The implications for the world’s poorest are severe, especially for the 3.7 billion people currently living in poverty.

The report underscores the extent to which inequality has derailed global development. Since 2015, the world’s wealthiest individuals have increased their fortunes by $33.9 trillion. Oxfam states that the combined wealth of just 3,000 billionaires now represents 14.6% of the global GDP. At the same time, the richest 1% hold nearly half—specifically, 43%—of the world’s total assets.

Oxfam’s findings indicate a stark disparity in the growth of private and public wealth. From 1995 to 2023, private wealth surged by $342 trillion, a figure that is eight times higher than the $44 trillion growth in public wealth during the same period. This widening gap is not just a statistic; it highlights a structural problem where public wealth, as a share of total global wealth, has actually declined over the years.

Further complicating the issue is the role of wealthy nations, which Oxfam criticizes for retreating from their responsibilities. The organization notes that affluent countries have slashed critical development aid more drastically in the past decade than at any time since 1960. The G7 nations—comprising Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States—are particularly culpable, as they collectively provide three-quarters of all international aid. Yet these same countries are planning to reduce their aid contributions by 28% in 2026 compared to levels in 2024.

As rich countries pull back on aid, poorer nations are plunging deeper into debt. Oxfam reports that 60% of low-income countries are now spending more on debt repayments than they are on essential public services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure. This dynamic leaves them even less equipped to tackle poverty, inequality, and economic instability.

Meanwhile, the world’s wealthiest individuals continue to consolidate their fortunes. According to Forbes, nine of the ten richest people on Earth are Americans. The list includes Elon Musk, Larry Ellison, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett, Larry Page, Steve Ballmer, Sergey Brin, and Jensen Huang. The only non-American in the top ten is Bernard Arnault and his family from France.

The current state of global inequality threatens the very goals that world leaders committed to a decade ago. In 2015, countries around the globe endorsed the Addis Ababa Action Agenda—a comprehensive framework for financing sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, Oxfam warns that these goals are failing. Only 16% of the agreed-upon targets are on track to be achieved by the 2030 deadline.

Oxfam International’s Executive Director, Amitabh Behar, criticized the dominance of private wealth in shaping global development, pointing out that the interests of a few are being prioritized over the needs of the majority. “There is glaring evidence that global development is desperately failing because – as the last decade shows – the interests of a very wealthy few are put over those of everyone else,” Behar said.

Behar added that rich countries are favoring corporate and financial elites over public welfare systems. “Rich countries have put Wall Street in the driver’s seat of global development. It’s a global private finance takeover which has overrun the evidence-backed ways to tackle poverty through public investments and fair taxation. It is no wonder governments are abysmally off track, be it on fostering decent jobs, gender equality, or ending hunger. This wealth concentration is choking efforts to end poverty”, he said.

The consequences of this inequality are not abstract. They affect real lives. More than 3.7 billion people worldwide live in poverty, and over 700 million are experiencing hunger. These numbers are likely to worsen with ongoing cuts in aid and development support. According to the Oxfam report, reductions in international aid could result in 2.9 million more deaths by 2030 due to causes related to HIV/AIDS alone.

The report appeals to citizens and policymakers alike to take action. It urges governments to support transformative policies that confront extreme inequality head-on and reshape the way development is financed. Behar emphasized the importance of taxing the ultra-wealthy and redirecting resources toward public services. “Trillions of dollars exist to meet the global goals, but they’re locked away in private accounts of the ultra-wealthy. It’s time we rejected the Wall Street consensus and instead put the public in the driving seat. Governments should heed widespread demands to tax the rich – and match it with a vision to build public goods from healthcare to energy. It’s a hopeful sign that some governments are banding together to fight inequality – more should follow their lead,” Behar added.

The Oxfam report concludes with a powerful message: solving global poverty is not a question of whether the world has enough resources. Rather, it’s a matter of political will and economic priorities. The wealth required to address global inequality and achieve the 2030 sustainable development goals already exists—it is simply not being shared.

By presenting these findings ahead of the International Conference on Financing for Development, Oxfam hopes to influence global leaders to move away from profit-driven models and invest in policies that serve the public good. If current trends continue, the organization warns, the gap between the richest and the rest of humanity will only widen, making it increasingly difficult to achieve a just and equitable world.

Trump’s Sweeping Agenda Bill Clears Initial Senate Hurdle Amid GOP Fractures

A sweeping legislative package reflecting former President Donald Trump’s policy vision narrowly advanced in the Senate, overcoming internal Republican dissent and late-night wrangling. Despite opposition from key GOP senators over Medicaid cuts and debt concerns, the bill gained enough support to move forward, setting the stage for intense debate and a possible July 4 final vote.

In a dramatic turn of events on Capitol Hill, Senate Republicans narrowly pushed forward a massive legislative package championed by former President Donald Trump, despite public resistance from members within their own ranks. The 1,000-page bill — a centerpiece of Trump’s revived domestic agenda — cleared its first procedural vote late Saturday, overcoming internal turbulence and a tense standoff that tested GOP unity.

Two Republican senators, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, broke ranks and opposed the measure. Paul voiced sharp objections to the bill’s proposed $5 trillion debt ceiling hike, while Tillis cited a projected $38.9 billion cut to Medicaid funds in his home state, warning of devastating consequences for hospitals and rural communities.

The measure, which includes $160 billion for border security, $150 billion in defense spending, and sweeping tax reforms, teetered on the edge of collapse as GOP leaders scrambled to secure votes. The drama unfolded in real time on the Senate floor, where Senate Minority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), flanked by top Republicans, anxiously awaited key votes from skeptical colleagues.

Senators Mike Lee, Rick Scott, and Cynthia Lummis eventually cast their votes in favor after closed-door negotiations, with Senator Ron Johnson switching from “no” to “yes” under mounting pressure. Their support came after Vice President J.D. Vance and party leaders engaged in last-minute talks behind closed doors, culminating in a late-night walk to the chamber that clinched the advancement.

One of the most contentious points came earlier in the week when the Senate parliamentarian struck down a key Medicaid tax provision for violating the Byrd Rule. Republican leaders hastily rewrote the section to comply with Senate rules. Another flashpoint emerged just hours before the vote, when freshman Senator Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) threatened to oppose the bill over a clause requiring the sale of public lands. Party leaders diffused the crisis by promising him a vote on an amendment to remove the language.

Despite these efforts, criticism from both sides of the aisle remains fierce. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) lambasted Republicans for dropping a nearly 1,000-page substitute amendment late Friday, leaving senators little time for review. He accused the GOP of hiding the bill’s true fiscal impact, stating, “They’re afraid to show how badly this will increase the deficit.”

Schumer cited a preliminary Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate indicating the legislation would slash Medicaid by $930 billion, a far deeper cut than the House-passed version. “It’s worse on health care, worse on SNAP, worse on the deficit,” he declared, vowing resistance.

Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine), often a pivotal swing vote, offered tentative support for moving the bill forward but made clear she’s not yet on board for final passage. “There are positive changes, but I still want to see further revisions,” she told reporters, adding that she plans to propose several amendments.

Outside the chamber, the proposal also drew backlash from high-profile figures like Elon Musk, who denounced the bill as a backward-looking handout. “It’s full of giveaways to fossil fuel industries and will kill millions of jobs,” Musk posted on X, formerly Twitter.

In a procedural twist, Schumer warned that if the bill proceeded, he would invoke a time-consuming tactic to have the entire bill read aloud on the Senate floor — a move that could delay debate for up to 12 hours and test the stamina of both clerks and lawmakers ahead of a lengthy series of amendment votes, colloquially known as vote-a-rama.

With a July 4 deadline set by President Trump for final passage, the legislation now heads into what promises to be a grueling final stretch. While Thune celebrated the initial advancement as a “once-in-a-generation opportunity,” deep divisions within the GOP and fierce Democratic resistance signal that the road ahead will be anything but smooth.

Schumer Plans Procedural Block to Delay GOP’s Megabill Passage

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York has informed fellow Democrats that he intends to enforce a full reading of the 1,000-page Republican megabill on the Senate floor as a procedural counter to Republican efforts. This strategy, to be enacted after the Republicans vote to proceed with the legislation, is expected to consume roughly 12 hours and potentially delay President Trump’s legislative timeline by at least half a day.

According to a Democratic insider with knowledge of the internal floor strategy, Schumer has instructed members of his caucus to be ready for the lengthy procedural maneuver. His objective is to compel Senate clerks to read aloud the entirety of the bill, a rarely used Senate tactic that can significantly slow down legislative action. The reading would likely stretch through Saturday night and into early Sunday morning, disrupting Senate Republicans’ timeline and forcing staff and senators to endure a prolonged overnight session.

The Senate’s Republican leadership had been bracing for this move, anticipating Schumer might use it as a form of protest. Schumer’s action aligns with broader Democratic resistance to the Republican-led bill, which encompasses sweeping tax cuts and government spending initiatives. The bill is a key component of President Trump’s agenda, and Senate Republicans have been scrambling to pass it before the July 4 deadline set by the president himself.

Originally, GOP leaders had planned to hold a procedural vote on Saturday afternoon to move the bill forward. That vote was to be followed by as many as 20 hours of formal debate. After debate time expired, the Senate would begin a “vote-a-rama” — a marathon session in which senators can offer an unlimited number of amendments, each requiring a vote.

However, Schumer’s procedural move has now shifted that anticipated timeline. With the full reading of the bill expected to last approximately 12 hours, the vote-a-rama is likely to begin much later than planned, potentially in the early hours of Sunday or even later.

There is also uncertainty about whether the Republicans will push clerks to begin reading the bill immediately and continue late into the night, or allow for some pause to give Senate staff time to rest. That decision could affect not only the comfort of Senate staffers but also the pace at which Republicans can push the bill through the chamber.

At the core of this dramatic Senate standoff is President Trump’s aggressive timeline. The administration and GOP leaders want the bill passed quickly to secure a legislative victory before the Independence Day holiday. Schumer’s procedural tactic, while not capable of stopping the bill outright, is meant to spotlight Democratic concerns about the content of the legislation and the rushed manner in which Republicans are pushing it forward.

While Schumer’s strategy is creating logistical hurdles for Republicans, it is not the only obstacle in their path. The vote margin is razor-thin, and GOP leaders are confronting internal dissent within their own ranks. The Senate Republican majority is slim, and they can only afford to lose three votes on any given measure if all Democrats are opposed.

Currently, three Republican senators — Rand Paul of Kentucky, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina — have indicated that they will vote “no” on advancing the bill. Their opposition adds to the suspense surrounding whether the legislation will ultimately move forward.

Senator Schumer’s procedural move is not without precedent. While rarely used, forcing the full reading of a bill is a legitimate tool available to any senator and can be used to slow down the legislative process, especially when a party is seeking more time for scrutiny or public awareness. In this case, the Democrats argue that the Republican bill is being rushed through without adequate discussion or consideration.

The size and scope of the bill — a sprawling legislative package that touches on both tax policy and government spending — make it particularly consequential. Democrats contend that such a large and impactful bill deserves a more deliberate and transparent legislative process. By compelling a reading of every line, Schumer is emphasizing his party’s position that the bill merits far more debate than it has received.

A source close to Democratic leadership summed up the mood within the caucus, saying that the goal is “to make it absolutely clear to the American people that this bill is being rammed through without proper vetting.” The source added that Schumer’s tactic was meant to “draw attention to the sheer size and recklessness of the legislation.”

Republicans, meanwhile, have expressed frustration with the delay. They view Schumer’s maneuver as a political stunt designed to obstruct rather than contribute to the process. However, they are aware that this is one of the few procedural levers Democrats can still pull in a chamber where they lack the majority.

For GOP leaders, the clock is now a significant factor. With the July 4 deadline looming and resistance within their own party, any delay — even one lasting just 12 hours — increases the pressure on their legislative strategy. The timing of the vote-a-rama, already a grueling process under normal conditions, is now more unpredictable than ever.

Whether Republicans will respond to Schumer’s tactic by immediately pushing through the reading overnight or pausing to regroup remains unclear. Either approach carries risks. An overnight reading could strain staff and senators alike, while a pause might give Democrats more time to mobilize public opposition or sway wavering Republicans.

Ultimately, Schumer’s move is a high-profile signal of Democratic dissatisfaction with both the substance and the speed of the Republican bill. While it may not be enough to kill the legislation, it underscores the increasingly acrimonious environment in the Senate as both parties clash over priorities and procedures.

In the coming hours, all eyes will be on the Senate floor — not just to see if the clerks begin their long reading, but also to gauge whether the Republican majority can hold together. With just three Republican senators needed to block the bill, and three already publicly opposed, the outcome remains on a knife’s edge.

As one Democratic source put it, “This is about more than just reading a bill. It’s about standing up for transparency, accountability, and the rights of the minority party.”

Indian Diaspora Center Hosts 2025 Annual Diaspora Lecture on Role of Diaspora in India’s Freedom Movement

The Indian Diaspora Center at the Dr. Thomas Abraham Library, in collaboration with Global Organization of People of Indian Origin (GOPIO) and the Indian American Kerala Cultural and Civic Center, hosted its 2025 Annual Diaspora Lecture and Interactive Session on Sunday, June 22, at the Kerala Center in Elmont, New York. The event, titled “The Role of America and the Indian Diaspora in the Freedom Movement of India,” featured a compelling presentation by distinguished author and speaker Dr. Bhuvan Lall.
Dr Thomas Abraham and Dr Bhuvan Lall in front of the Indian Diaspora Center
Dr. Thomas Abraham and Dr. Buvan Lall in front of the Indian Diaspora Center housed at the Indian American Kerala Center

The program commenced at 4:00 p.m. with a networking coffee/tea followed by Dr. Lall’s talk and discussion at 4:30 p.m. Keral Center President Alex Esthappan welcomed audience and said that the center is happy to house the Dr. Thomas Abraham Library. The evening concluded with drinks and an Indian dinner at 6:00 p.m. Attendees gathered at the Library Hall, located at The Kerala Center in Elmont, New York.

Dr. Lall captivated the audience with his vivid storytelling, shedding light on the pivotal contributions of Lala Har Dayal and the Ghadar Movement in the United States and Europe during the early 20th century.

Dr Bhuvan Lall speaking at the Annual lecture of the Indian Diaspora Center
Dr. Bhuvan Lall speaking at the Annual Lecture of the Indian Diaspora Center

 Dr. Lall stated, “According to the timeworn, intelligence reports and records locked away in the archives, Hukumat-i-Britannia considered Har Dayal the single biggest threat to the empire as long as he was alive. The origin of Britain’s MI6 was intertwined with the life of Har Dayal. Sir David Petrie, Director-General MI 5 (1941-46) & Chief of British Intelligence in India wrote, “No man in recent times has sinned more grievously against the (British) Government… than Har Dayal…” Year after year Hukumat-i-Britannia termed him as the most brilliant person born in India, the most dangerous revolutionary the British Empire had encountered in India, and the most decent human being one could meet on Planet Earth. However, despite many attempts, Hukumat-i-Britannia could never silence or arrest the phenomenon called Har Dayal.”

Dr Lall also highlighted the inspiring legacy of Subhas Chandra Bose, as the Ghadar Party morphed into the Azad Hind Fauj. He emphasized the Indian diaspora’s role in India’s struggle for independence. Attendees praised Dr. Lall’s commitment to presenting objective historical truths, and his laudatory approach to Indian history and unsung patriots.

As a token of appreciation, Dr. Lall was presented with two rare First Day Covers, canceled and released by the US Postal Service during the First Global Convention of People of Indian Origin in New York City in 1989, where GOPIO was founded. These collector’s items of US Postal Service’s First Day Covers featuring Mahatma Gandhi stamps, honored the Indian diaspora and the historic global meet.

The event was attended by community members, scholars, and notable figures, including GOPIO Chairman Dr. Thomas Abraham who chaired the meeting, GOPIO International Coordinator for North America Prof. Raj Vangapaty, GOPIO Council Chair for Seniors Mukund Mehta, Kerala Center Secretary Raju Thomas and officials pf GOPIO and Keral Center, fostering vibrant discussions on India’s freedom movement.

Speaker Dr Bhuvan Lall and Dr Aarti Lall with GOPIO and Kerala Center officials members and supporters
Speaker Dr. Bhuvan Lall and Dr. Aarti Lal Lall with GOPIO and the Kerala Center officials, members and supporters

For more information about the Indian Diaspora Center and future events, contact the Dr. Thomas Abraham Library at the Indian American Kerala Center, 1824 Fairfax St., Elmont, NY 11003, Tel: 516-358-2000.

About the Indian Diaspora Center at the Dr. Thomas Abraham Library – The Indian Diaspora Center is dedicated to preserving and promoting the history and contributions of the Indian diaspora through educational programs, cultural events, and community engagement.

About GOPIO – The Global Organization of People of Indian Origin (GOPIO) is a non-profit organization committed to fostering unity, cultural heritage, and advocacy for the Indian diaspora worldwide.

About the Indian American Kerala Cultural Center – The Kerala Center serves as a hub for cultural, educational, and community activities, celebrating the heritage of Indian Americans, particularly those from Kerala.

Pope Leo XIV Reasserts Celibacy and Demands Strong Action Against Clergy Abuse in Directive to Bishops

Pope Leo XIV made a firm declaration on Wednesday that Catholic priests must remain celibate and urged bishops to take “firm and decisive” steps in addressing sexual abuse within the Church. His comments came as he addressed Catholic leaders from across the globe, setting clear expectations for leadership and moral conduct among clergy.

The pontiff gathered with approximately 400 bishops and cardinals representing 38 nations inside St. Peter’s Basilica. The assembly was part of the special Holy Year celebrations dedicated to clergy. Following a speech filled with encouragement directed at young seminarians the day before, Leo’s Wednesday address served as a comprehensive and serious guideline for bishops on how to shepherd their congregations responsibly and ethically.

This message carried particular weight considering Leo’s previous position as Cardinal Robert Prevost. As the former head of the Vatican Dicastery for Bishops, Prevost played a key role in selecting and vetting bishops from 2023 until his own election as pope in May. During his time in that role, the Chicago-born cleric was responsible for ensuring that newly appointed bishops aligned with Pope Francis’ inclusive and dialogical vision for the Catholic Church. His past experience clearly informed his message to his fellow bishops.

During his speech, Pope Leo XIV emphasized that a bishop’s primary responsibility is to promote unity among the clergy in his diocese and to be accessible to his parishioners through both word and deed. He urged bishops to adopt a humble and modest lifestyle, shunning opulence and the pursuit of material gain. The pope emphasized the importance of being approachable and generous, describing bishops as paternal and fraternal figures who should maintain close relationships with the priests under their care.

“In his personal life, he must be detached from the pursuit of wealth and from forms of favoritism based on money or power,” the pope stated, reinforcing his call for financial and moral integrity among bishops.

Leo also stressed the importance of celibacy, calling it a defining and visible symbol of the Church’s sacred nature. “Bishops must remain celibate and present to all the authentic image of the church, holy and chaste in her members as in her head,” he said. This declaration stood as a clear reaffirmation of the Church’s long-standing discipline, despite ongoing debates around the world regarding the future of celibacy in the priesthood.

When speaking about the issue of abuse, Pope Leo XIV delivered a particularly stern warning. He urged bishops to act promptly and resolutely when handling situations that may lead to scandal or involve any form of abuse, especially cases involving minors. His guidance underscored the need to align with existing Church laws and civil regulations, saying bishops must “be firm and decisive in dealing with situations that can cause scandal and with every case of abuse, especially involving minors, and fully respect the legislation currently in force.”

Leo’s remarks on abuse were the second time in a week that he publicly addressed the issue, which has continued to cast a shadow over the Church for years. Just a few days earlier, on Friday night, he had issued a written statement in response to a report from a Peruvian journalist. The journalist had exposed widespread abuses within a Catholic movement in Peru, drawing global attention. In that written message, Leo declared that abuse of any kind must not be tolerated in the Catholic Church. He explicitly cited sexual, spiritual, and authoritative abuses, calling for institutional reforms that would foster transparency and accountability.

He stressed the need for the Church to adopt “transparent processes” and promote a “culture of prevention,” ensuring that abusive behavior is not only addressed but systematically prevented in the future.

The firm stance taken by Leo XIV on abuse and celibacy marks a continuation of the legacy left by Pope Francis, who supported Leo’s rise to the papacy. Francis had also reaffirmed celibacy for priests in the Latin rite, although he openly acknowledged that it is a Church discipline, not a fixed doctrine, meaning it could potentially change over time. However, despite calls from bishops in the Amazon to ordain married priests in order to ease the priest shortage in remote regions, Francis declined to alter the rule. His decision emphasized the importance of maintaining the celibate tradition even amid pastoral challenges.

Leo’s own journey and experience in Latin America add further perspective to his position. As a missionary and later a bishop in Peru, Prevost served for more than twenty years before returning to the Vatican. This background gave him direct exposure to the debates and pastoral realities surrounding priestly celibacy and Church governance in regions like the Amazon, where the demand for clergy often outpaces supply.

Given this context, Leo’s decision to uphold priestly celibacy during his address on Wednesday reflects both his commitment to tradition and a pastoral sensitivity shaped by experience. “Bishops must remain celibate and present to all the authentic image of the church,” he reiterated, leaving no doubt about his position on the matter.

His insistence on personal integrity, pastoral closeness, and bold action in the face of abuse reflects a broader strategy to restore faith in Church leadership. In reaffirming values like chastity, humility, and transparency, Pope Leo XIV seeks not only to guide but also to reform. By urging bishops to embody these principles, he hopes to rebuild the moral authority of the Church, especially in communities still healing from past scandals.

The gathering of bishops in St. Peter’s Basilica wasn’t just symbolic; it marked a moment of renewed purpose and accountability for Catholic leadership. Leo’s speech laid out a clear roadmap for the Church’s future, with the pope acting as both spiritual leader and reformer.

With firm guidance on issues of discipline, integrity, and abuse, Pope Leo XIV’s message to the bishops was unmistakable: the Catholic Church must return to its core values and ensure that its shepherds are living examples of the teachings they profess. The pontiff’s address served as a defining moment for his papacy, clarifying that while compassion and openness are vital, so too are strength, clarity, and accountability.

By reasserting celibacy and zero tolerance for abuse, Leo XIV positioned himself not only as a steward of tradition but as a leader determined to confront the Church’s deepest challenges with courage and integrity.

Connecticut’s New Laws Take Effect July 1: Focus on Education, Energy, and Public Welfare

Starting July 1, Connecticut will see the implementation of 93 new laws, some originating from as far back as the 2021 legislative session. These changes, taking effect with the beginning of the 2025-2026 fiscal year, span a wide range of areas—from education and energy policy to immigration and public safety—marking a significant shift in the state’s approach to governance.

A key initiative among the new laws is the expansion of special education programming in public schools. Complementing this is the creation of a new endowment fund that is expected, within a few years, to provide free daycare and preschool for families earning under $100,000. This initiative aims to alleviate the financial burden on working families and improve access to early childhood education.

Another important policy shift comes in the form of energy savings. The state has introduced an adjustment to its energy policy, expected to reduce household electric bills by approximately $200 annually, with businesses poised to save even more.

Financial education is also receiving attention. Under the new laws, public high schools will now be required to include personal finance and financial literacy units in their curriculum. This move is aimed at better preparing students for real-world financial responsibilities.

In response to recent election controversies in Bridgeport, Connecticut will mandate that all local election officials install video surveillance on ballot drop boxes. This law seeks to improve transparency and restore public confidence in the electoral process.

Changes in traffic law are also noteworthy. Police will no longer be permitted to stop vehicles solely for minor equipment violations, such as broken tail lights or faulty license plate lights. However, the same legislation clarifies law enforcement’s authority regarding cannabis use. Officers will be able to stop a motorist if they observe them using cannabis and can also detect its smell. This aims to maintain safety without encouraging unnecessary stops.

Libraries may also experience a significant transformation in the near future. A new law prohibits public libraries from signing or renewing contracts with eBook and audiobook publishers that restrict access, but only if other states with a combined population of 7 million enact similar legislation. This cooperative approach is intended to pressure publishers into offering fairer terms to public institutions.

In the realm of youth development, a grant program has been launched to benefit nonprofit organizations in economically distressed municipalities. This initiative, backed by the State Bond Commission, will help fund equipment, facilities, and supervisory staff for youth sports programs.

Public schools will now be required to assign a staff member to communicate with representatives from federal immigration agencies such as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Another law broadens the list of violent felons who may be subject to federal immigration enforcement. Simultaneously, it enables individuals to file lawsuits against municipalities that assist ICE in detaining and deporting individuals, highlighting a dual focus on compliance and civil rights.

Gun permit processing is also being streamlined. The responsibility for reviewing pistol permit applications in smaller towns will no longer fall on the chief elected officials but will instead be handled by law enforcement professionals, ensuring greater efficiency and possibly more consistent decision-making.

While many bills await Governor Ned Lamont’s final decision, one in particular has drawn controversy. Lamont has promised to veto legislation that would make striking workers eligible for unemployment benefits. Earlier this year, the General Assembly introduced 3,840 bills, with only 940 advancing past the committee stage. The House and Senate approved 258 bills requiring the governor’s signature. As of mid-June, Lamont had signed 64 bills and partially vetoed two. Typically, a governor reviews around 275 bills in a budget-setting session.

A standout component of this year’s legislative output is the Early Childhood Education Endowment. The state will allocate up to $300 million from its budget surplus to this fund, with a portion immediately available to the Office of Early Childhood. The goal is to expand access to preschool and daycare, increase staff salaries, and ultimately offer free programs for families earning less than $100,000. For those making more, the program aims to cap costs at 7% of income. Future surpluses are expected to grow the fund to $1 billion over time.

Public school funding is also set to increase. The state’s two-year, $55.8 billion budget includes additional education support for certain municipalities, while 80 towns will see their funding levels maintained. New laws will create special education grants based on the number of qualifying students in each district. The Department of Education will also be tasked with establishing standard rates for what special education providers can charge local boards of education.

On the campaign finance front, the State Elections Enforcement Commission (SEEC) will cut back the number of post-election audits of candidate committees to 20% of the 187 legislative races. SEEC meetings will now be live-streamed to enhance transparency. An attempt by legislators to exert more control over SEEC operations failed after Governor Lamont expressed strong opposition to compromising the commission’s independence.

Another legislative accomplishment involves eBook contracts for libraries. After years of complaints about high prices and restrictive lending terms, the new law would bar libraries from renewing or entering into unfavorable contracts once other states with a collective population of 7 million pass similar laws. This is intended to encourage publishers to agree to “commercially reasonable terms.”

The higher education system will also undergo reforms in response to previous mismanagement. Following reports about misuse of purchasing cards by former State Colleges and Universities Chancellor Terrence Cheng, the legislature enacted new regulations governing the use of state-issued cards and vehicles. Institutions will also be required to provide mandatory compliance training and hire a compliance officer by next January.

The state treasurer will launch a privately funded “safe harbor account” designed to provide grants to nonprofit organizations that offer reproductive or gender-affirming care. This includes covering expenses such as travel, lodging, and meals for those seeking such services.

In terms of public safety, communities with populations over 20,000 will now be permitted to adopt ordinances to destroy certain all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and dirt bikes seized during street takeovers. Municipalities are, however, required to make reasonable efforts to contact the rightful owners of stolen vehicles before destruction.

Tow truck operations will also face new restrictions. For nonconsensual towing, particularly in private apartment complexes, operators will be limited under new laws. These properties must post clear signs indicating parking rules. Meanwhile, tow companies handling highway or traffic-related cases will see an increase in permissible rates.

Connecticut is also taking steps to support its elderly population. A new law focused on reducing prescription drug costs introduces provisions to enhance transparency around rebates and ensures that patients receive credit for out-of-pocket and out-of-network drug costs. There will also be a feasibility study on importing medications from Canada and expanded capacity for the state to make bulk drug purchases.

With these wide-ranging changes, Connecticut aims to address pressing concerns in education, healthcare, public safety, and more—all while improving government transparency and efficiency.

NAVA Honors Community Leaders at 18th Annual Celebration in Flushing

The New American Voters Association (NAVA) hosted its 18th Annual Dinner Dance and Award Ceremony on June 19, 2025, at Flushing Marina. Organized by NAVA’s Founder and President Dr. Dilip Nath, the evening was a vibrant celebration of civic engagement, public service, and cultural unity. This year’s event also commemorated Juneteenth and included a performance by “Joy of Dance,” blending festivity with the recognition of significant contributions to the community.

A primary focus of the event was to honor individuals who have made noteworthy commitments to public service. These honorees were presented with awards in recognition of their dedication and efforts to uplift society. The evening featured speeches by several prominent elected officials who came to show their support and appreciation for NAVA’s mission and the honorees.

Among those delivering remarks were New York City Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, Queens Borough President Donovan Richards, Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine, Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz, and New York State Senators John Liu and Leroy Comrie. Additionally, representatives from the offices of U.S. Senator Charles Schumer and Governor Kathy Hochul were also present, reflecting the event’s broad political engagement.

Dr. Hari Shukla, Chairman of NAVA, received a particularly significant honor during the ceremony. United States Senator Charles Schumer presented him with a Proclamation that highlighted Dr. Shukla’s extraordinary contributions to medical science and child health. The document acknowledged that Dr. Shukla was the first in the United States to use surfactant treatment in preterm infants. It also pointed out his groundbreaking development of a formula for umbilical catheterization, which has become a standard in pediatric care globally. As noted in the Proclamation, “Dr. Shukla’s formula for umbilical catheter is used in 400 million children throughout the world.”

This recognition placed a spotlight on the vital intersection of scientific innovation and public service, emphasizing NAVA’s commitment to celebrating immigrant success stories and the far-reaching impact of such achievements.

The audience included more than two hundred attendees, a mix of community members, NAVA supporters, and civic leaders, all gathered to acknowledge the role that immigrant communities play in shaping the broader narrative of American progress. The high attendance further demonstrated the community’s ongoing support for NAVA’s work and its broader mission of civic engagement and voter participation among new Americans.

Dr. Dilip Nath, who spearheaded the event, has been a consistent advocate for immigrant rights and civic empowerment. Through NAVA, he has worked for nearly two decades to encourage political involvement among new citizens and to create a platform where their voices are recognized. The annual dinner dance serves as a highlight of this ongoing mission, bringing together public servants and constituents in a celebratory setting that also promotes civic responsibility.

The presence of key city and state officials reinforced the importance of this initiative. “Events like these are vital,” said NYC Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, “because they help unite our diverse communities while recognizing those who are building bridges across neighborhoods and cultures.” Williams, known for his advocacy work and progressive stances, praised NAVA’s efforts to make the electoral process more accessible to immigrant populations.

Queens Borough President Donovan Richards echoed these sentiments, stating, “Organizations like NAVA play a crucial role in empowering communities that are too often underrepresented. We need to continue supporting platforms that amplify these voices.”

Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine spoke to the evolving landscape of New York City’s demographic makeup and how organizations such as NAVA contribute to civic inclusivity. “The work being done here is about making democracy stronger,” he said, “by ensuring that every resident, regardless of where they come from, feels invested in the future of this city.”

Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz commended NAVA for recognizing individuals who not only serve the public but also inspire future generations. “Tonight’s honorees have dedicated their lives to service, and that deserves our deepest appreciation,” she said.

Meanwhile, New York State Senator John Liu, himself a trailblazer as the first Asian American to hold citywide office in New York, emphasized the importance of acknowledging community leadership. “When we lift up stories like those of Dr. Shukla,” Liu remarked, “we send a powerful message about the contributions immigrants make every day to our society.”

The evening’s recognition of Dr. Hari Shukla stood out as a symbolic reminder of how medical innovation and immigrant excellence go hand in hand. Senator Charles Schumer’s Proclamation stated, “Dr. Shukla is the pioneer in the United States of using Surfactant in preterm infants,” underscoring his trailblazing role in neonatal care. The citation further noted the global reach of his work: “Dr. Shukla’s formula for umbilical catheter is used in 400 million children throughout the world.”

This prestigious recognition from one of the highest-ranking U.S. lawmakers exemplified the spirit of the event: honoring those who, through their expertise and commitment, have impacted millions of lives while also representing the best of American ideals.

NAVA’s decision to align this year’s dinner with Juneteenth added an extra layer of significance. Juneteenth, which marks the emancipation of enslaved African Americans in the United States, served as a fitting backdrop for a night celebrating freedom, equality, and progress. The “Joy of Dance” performance energized the room and served as a cultural bridge connecting the historical legacy of Juneteenth with the modern journey of immigrants becoming fully active participants in American civic life.

The celebratory tone of the evening did not overshadow its broader message. Rather, the festivity underscored a sense of achievement while also calling attention to the work that remains in ensuring inclusivity in public life. Dr. Dilip Nath reminded attendees of NAVA’s enduring mission, which is not just about voter registration, but about nurturing leadership, building trust in institutions, and encouraging lifelong civic involvement among new Americans.

As the evening came to a close, the atmosphere remained vibrant and hopeful, fueled by a sense of shared purpose and mutual recognition. More than just a ceremonial gathering, the 18th Annual Dinner Dance served as a vivid reminder of the positive influence that immigrants have across every sector of society — from public service and political leadership to groundbreaking advancements in science and medicine.

With over two hundred people in attendance, the 2025 edition of NAVA’s annual event was more than a celebration — it was a reaffirmation of community, service, and the essential role that immigrant voices continue to play in shaping the American experience.

Bezos and Sanchez’s Venice Wedding Sparks Protests, Praise, and Debate

The extravagant wedding celebrations of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and television presenter Lauren Sanchez concluded on Saturday evening in Venice with a grand gala. While the festivities were in full swing, not everyone in the city was in a celebratory mood. As celebrity guests prepared to board water taxis from their upscale accommodations, a group of Venetians and activists gathered to protest the high-profile event.

These protesters voiced a range of concerns. Some were residents frustrated by the consequences of mass tourism in their fragile city, while others were activists raising alarms about capitalism and climate change. On Saturday, hundreds took to the streets, displaying a large banner from the iconic Rialto Bridge that read “no space for Bezos” and igniting colorful flares. Although they initially planned to disrupt the event by jumping into canals with inflatable crocodiles and blocking the passage of wedding attendees, those plans were eventually scrapped.

Despite the demonstrations, Bezos remained unbothered. When spotted entering the renowned Harry’s Bar for lunch, he blew kisses at the cameras in response to a local journalist’s question about the protests.

City officials downplayed the protests. Venice’s deputy mayor described the demonstrators as “narcissists” and emphasized that events like the Bezos-Sanchez wedding represent the kind of upscale tourism the city wants to attract. Simone Venturini, who serves as the city’s economic development councillor, expressed optimism that this high-profile wedding would inspire more couples to choose Venice for their nuptials. “We are not Iran. The city cannot say who can or who cannot get married. We have no moral police going around,” he told the BBC while standing along the Grand Canal, where gondolas floated by filled with tourists.

Although the activists didn’t succeed in halting the ceremony, they claimed one small victory. For security reasons, the final evening’s event was relocated from a more central location to the Arsenale, a venue that’s easier to secure.

Some Venetians and climate activists say the real issue goes beyond just one lavish wedding. “I think the main problem is that Venice is becoming like an amusement park,” said Paola, a member of the Extinction Rebellion group. She took particular offense at the arrival of many wedding guests by private jet. “Of course, mass tourism is eating the city alive, but the fact that billionaires can come here and use the city as their amusement park is an enormous problem.”

The Italian press enthusiastically covered what they dubbed the “wedding of the year.” The city was abuzz with sightings of A-list celebrities like Leonardo DiCaprio and Kim Kardashian. Reports mentioned elaborate feasts featuring local delicacies such as cod prepared in the regional style. Photographs of Sanchez in her white lace Dolce & Gabbana gown, reportedly inspired by a 1950s Sophia Loren look, filled media outlets.

Contrary to some early concerns, the wedding didn’t paralyze the city. Celebrities like Ivanka Trump and Bill Gates were seen exploring art galleries, and Bezos and Sanchez were photographed at multiple scenic locations. Yet the chances of a tourist running into a real celebrity were slim. Most were more likely to meet a Bezos impersonator who had traveled from Germany just to pose for photos.

Transportation and tourism in the city remained mostly unaffected. Water taxis and gondolas were still available for hire, and there were no large groups of frustrated tourists unable to enjoy Venice’s charms. Some streets were temporarily closed near key wedding events, but overall disruption was minimal. Most of the “No Space for Bezos” signs had been torn down, and the few bits of remaining graffiti were being quickly removed. Attempts to project protest slogans onto buildings were swiftly halted by local police. Even the protest march planned for Saturday night had received official approval.

Still, many locals are deeply concerned about the increasing commercialization of their hometown. In Venice, fears that the city is becoming a playground for tourists at the expense of residents are well-founded. At the city’s main railway station, authorities now randomly check visitors for mandatory day passes—a new measure intended to reduce crowding.

A few minutes away, in a picturesque square, longtime resident Roberto Zanon shared his painful story. At 77, he’s being evicted from the home he’s lived in his entire life. His landlord sold the property to out-of-town developers, and he’s finding it impossible to secure a new place in Venice. “One, two, three doors – those are locals, but the rest is all for tourism now,” he said, pointing to the neighboring buildings. “There are fewer and fewer Venetians here,” he added, visibly heartbroken. “There is no purpose any more. You lose your friends. You lose piece of your heart. But sadly this situation is unstoppable.”

Yet Roberto doesn’t blame Bezos for choosing Venice as a wedding destination. Having worked in tourism himself, he described it as “an honour” to have such prominent guests in the city. “I find it positive,” he said.

Other Venetians shared similar views. In a souvenir shop selling magnets and t-shirts, a local woman named Leda welcomed the arrival of Bezos and his guests. She bluntly remarked, “I think there should be more people like Bezos here. Right now we get trash tourism and Venice doesn’t deserve that.” Leda explained that she once owned a shop selling high-quality Italian goods, but had to close it due to dwindling demand. “It’s low-cost, hit-and-run tourism,” she said. “People take 20 euro flights, come here and don’t spend a thing. That’s not what Venice needs.”

As the grand wedding comes to a close, what will remain behind in Venice? Deputy Mayor Venturini confirmed that Bezos donated approximately three million euros to organizations dedicated to preserving the city’s delicate infrastructure. While that gesture was welcomed by some, others viewed it as insignificant in the broader context of Bezos’s wealth. “It’s around three euros for a normal person, if you put in proportion to Bezos’s wealth,” argued Lorenzo, another member of Extinction Rebellion. “It’s a very low amount of money.”

In the end, the Bezos-Sanchez wedding highlighted the ongoing divide in Venice: between those who see high-end tourism as a lifeline for the local economy and those who believe it accelerates the city’s cultural and demographic decline. While the wedding brought global attention, luxury, and donations, it also reignited long-standing debates over who Venice truly belongs to—and who gets to shape its future.

Digital Passports Take Off: TSA Now Accepts Mobile IDs, But Booklets Still Needed for International Travel

The familiar navy-blue U.S. passport booklet might soon become less necessary—at least during the first part of your trip. This summer, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) quietly began accepting digital U.S. passports stored in Apple Wallet and Google Wallet. This allows travelers to tap their phones at TSA identity checkpoints instead of pulling out a physical document.

However, there’s a catch: this digital convenience currently works only at select domestic checkpoints. So for now, travelers are advised not to leave the paper booklet behind.

When it comes to defining a “digital passport,” both Apple and Google use their own terminology. Apple categorizes it under “Digital ID,” while Google refers to it as an “ID pass.” Regardless of the branding, the enrollment process for both is nearly identical. Users open their respective wallet app, select the option to add an ID, scan the data page of their passport, hold the phone near the passport’s NFC chip, and then record a short selfie video. Once submitted, the encrypted digital credential is stored in the device’s secure element, the same hardware used to protect tap-to-pay features.

Google introduced passport storage in September 2024, promoting the benefit as “no more juggling documents at TSA.” Apple responded at its Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) on June 9, announcing that iOS 26 would include the same functionality starting in the fall, available on iPhone XS and newer models. This development brings both tech ecosystems into alignment, particularly valuable for frequent travelers who use both platforms.

The TSA’s adoption of digital IDs now includes more than 250 airport checkpoints across major travel hubs, ranging from Boston to Los Angeles. At these locations, travelers can simply tap their phones, which then brings up a consent screen. Upon approval, the traveler’s face appears on the TSA officer’s tablet and is matched to the passport photo stored in the digital ID.

Still, the TSA urges travelers to “carry a physical and acceptable form of ID” with them. This is because not all security lanes have been updated with the necessary scanners, and some officers continue to verify identification manually with physical documents.

It’s also important to remember that a TSA checkpoint, even at an international airport like JFK, only gets you partway through your journey. For international travel, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and foreign immigration authorities still require machine-readable physical passports and visas that conform to standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Until CBP updates its systems to accept digital wallet-based credentials, your smartphone won’t suffice for border crossings. Officials have indicated that a pilot program might be in development, though no specific timeline has been announced.

As of now, the system is available to any U.S. passport holder using a smartphone running Android 9 or later, or an iPhone with the iOS 26 beta installed. However, these travelers will only find functioning digital ID scanners at airports participating in the TSA’s digital ID pilot, which currently accounts for around 80 percent of domestic air travel.

Additionally, residents in 15 states can already add a mobile driver’s license to their digital wallet. The TSA confirms that these mobile licenses will remain valid once the Real ID enforcement deadline takes effect in 2026.

The TSA has made it clear that its officers only view essential data through the digital ID system: namely the traveler’s name, photo, and date of birth. Notably, they do not see the passport number or the address. Both Apple and Google ensure the credential remains offline within secure, tamper-resistant hardware on the device, requiring biometric authentication—either Face ID or fingerprint—to access. If a phone’s battery dies in line, the fallback is the same as when an e-boarding pass fails to load: paper and plastic are still necessary backups.

For those ready to enroll, the process follows a straightforward five-step setup:

  1. Open the Wallet app and select the Add to Wallet option
  2. Choose either ID pass or Digital ID
  3. Use the phone’s camera to scan the passport’s photo page
  4. Hold the phone against the passport cover to read the NFC chip
  5. Record the prompted selfie video and wait for approval

While the process is simple, it hasn’t been entirely smooth for everyone. Some travelers have experienced delays when encountering TSA agents unfamiliar with the new system. Moreover, if a traveler has a connecting international flight, gate agents continue to require physical passports before allowing boarding. Therefore, the digital passport should be treated as a convenience—“a speed pass”—rather than a full replacement for the physical document.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) acknowledges that for full international adoption of mobile passports, there would need to be new international agreements as well as upgrades to automated border control gates, or e-gates. Apple, looking ahead, hinted at a future where “instant renewals” could automatically update a passport inside the Wallet as soon as it’s approved. With over 20 states now working to issue mobile driver’s licenses, the need to carry a bulky ID pouch may soon become a thing of the past.

Despite these advances, some travel rules remain unchanged. Whether you’re going digital or sticking with paper, one golden rule still applies: always keep your ID readily accessible. For now, the wisest strategy is to maintain your passport in both digital and physical forms—use your phone for speedy TSA checks, but keep the booklet in your pocket for everything else, especially overseas travel.

Vishnu Manchu’s Kannappa to Showcase Three Generations of Mohan Babu Family in Mega Budget Epic

Kannappa is shaping up to be one of the most anticipated Telugu films following the recent success of Kuberaa. The historical drama is not only notable for its grand scale and big names but also for a rare cinematic occurrence — three generations of the Mohan Babu family will be appearing in key roles. Spearheaded by Vishnu Manchu, who is both the lead actor and the producer, the film boasts a star-studded cast, including South Indian superstars Prabhas and Mohanlal, as well as Bollywood’s Akshay Kumar, who takes on the divine role of Lord Shiva.

Scheduled for release on June 27, 2025, Kannappa is a big-budget production that carries significant emotional and cinematic weight. One of the most remarkable elements of the film is its inclusion of multiple generations from a single film family — a rarity in Indian cinema. Leading the charge is Manchu Mohan Babu, a legendary actor in Telugu film history, who plays a powerful and pivotal priest in the story. His son, Vishnu Manchu, is cast in the title role of Kannappa, the central character around whom the film revolves.

The next generation of the Mohan Babu family is also making a splash in this project. Vishnu Manchu’s twin daughters, Ariana and Viviana, have lent their voices to a song in the film and will also make brief on-screen appearances in cameo roles. In addition, Vishnu’s young son, Avram Manchu, will portray the childhood version of Kannappa, allowing the audience to witness the character’s journey from a young age. Rounding out the familial presence is Vishnu’s daughter, Arya Vidya, who is also set to make a special appearance.

This multi-generational involvement adds a unique layer of intimacy and depth to the film. In an interview, Vishnu Manchu discussed his decision to bring his family into the project, highlighting that the narrative provided a natural opportunity to include them. “Kannappa had a good scope to include three generations of my family in the film, and I did not think twice before making everyone act in the movie,” he stated.

Such a combination of three generations in one film is highly unusual and marks a rare moment in Indian cinema. The last time something similar occurred in Telugu films was with the critically acclaimed and commercially successful Manam. That film starred three generations of the Akkineni family — the iconic Akkineni Nageswara Rao, his son Nagarjuna, and grandson Naga Chaitanya — all of whom played significant roles. Manam was widely celebrated not just for its emotional storytelling but also for bringing together a lineage of talent in a meaningful way.

Kannappa aims to replicate that magic while carving out its own legacy. With a production budget exceeding ₹150 crore, the film is being crafted on an epic scale. Apart from the central family members, the cast features a host of prominent names from Indian cinema. Mukesh Rishi, known for his strong screen presence, will be seen in a key supporting role. Veteran actors Sarath Kumar and Madhoo bring their years of experience to the ensemble, while popular actress Kajal Aggarwal adds star value. Comedian Brahmanandam, a beloved figure in Telugu cinema, will also feature, likely providing some comic relief in this otherwise intense narrative.

The music, an essential component of any Indian film, is composed by Stephen Devassy, who has crafted the film’s score to match the grandeur of the storyline. The runtime has been finalized at 182 minutes, suggesting an expansive and layered narrative that takes its time in unfolding.

Kannappa, both as a cinematic offering and as a family collaboration, is clearly a labor of love for Vishnu Manchu. The film tells the story of a legendary devotee of Lord Shiva, and the actor-producer appears to have invested not just money but heart into every frame. With its spiritual overtones, historical setting, and mythological depth, the film is expected to strike a chord with audiences across generations.

Adding to its wide appeal is the strategic casting of actors from across India. Akshay Kumar, playing the role of Lord Shiva, brings a pan-Indian appeal and is likely to draw in North Indian audiences. Meanwhile, the presence of Malayalam superstar Mohanlal and Telugu icon Prabhas ensures that the film commands attention in the South. The multilingual cast serves as a strong signal that Kannappa is being positioned not just as a regional release, but as a film with national, and potentially international, ambitions.

While much of the film’s plot remains under wraps, the combination of historical fiction, devotional elements, and family drama is expected to be a compelling mix. The personal investment of the Manchu family, combined with the rich storytelling tradition of Telugu cinema, sets the stage for a film that is as much a cultural event as it is a movie.

Kannappa is more than just a big-budget Telugu film. It is a project that brings together generations of cinematic legacy, star power from various industries, and a deeply rooted mythological tale. With the emotional draw of a family acting together and the production values to support its grand vision, Kannappa is gearing up to be one of the landmark films of 2025. As the release date draws closer, expectations continue to rise for what promises to be a film rich in both substance and spectacle.

Millions Denied Boarding Each Year Due to Overbooked Flights, Study Reveals

An eye-opening report has unveiled that a staggering number of air passengers are being denied boarding despite holding a valid boarding pass and passport. This widespread issue stems from the common airline practice of overbooking, which has left millions of travelers stranded.

According to data released by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), approximately 6.6 million passengers each year are turned away from boarding flights after being ‘bumped’ due to overbooked planes. This occurs when airlines sell more tickets than there are available seats, anticipating that a portion of passengers won’t show up. However, when more travelers turn up than expected, airlines are forced to deny boarding to some, creating delays and frustration among affected passengers, as reported by The Liverpool Echo.

A recent study conducted by GoCompare, utilizing CAA data and supplemental survey insights, estimates that over the past decade, roughly 20.9 million passengers have experienced consequences due to overbooking. The study found that one-third of those impacted were outright denied the chance to board their flights, resulting in an annual average of 6.6 million travelers unable to fly despite being ticketed.

Legally, airlines are required to assist those who are denied boarding by offering rebooking options, compensation, and additional support. Despite these requirements, the study reveals that assistance is not always guaranteed. While the majority—84 percent—of bumped passengers were eventually placed on alternative flights, this still leaves about one million people annually who never received a replacement flight, compounding their travel disruption.

For those who missed their flights, the aftermath was not just about delays. Nearly two-thirds reported financial losses resulting from being denied boarding. This includes missed accommodations, transport connections, or additional costs incurred from having to make new travel arrangements. Alarmingly, less than half of these affected passengers pursued claims through their travel insurance, even though some costs could potentially be recovered.

These findings have prompted renewed calls for travelers to be fully aware of their rights and options when it comes to overbooking-related issues. Rhys Jones, a travel insurance expert at Go.Compare, strongly advised passengers to take action when facing this stressful scenario.

“Flight overbooking happens more than we’d like to think, and it can make for an extremely stressful start to any trip for the passengers affected,” Jones warned. He emphasized the importance of confirming the reason for denial. “If it happens to you, and you’re not allowed to board a plane, the first thing you should do is confirm with the airline that you were denied boarding because of overbooking. Get this in writing if possible.”

Jones also encouraged travelers to immediately engage with the airline to understand how they will be supported. “Next, you’ll want to discuss what your airline intends to do to get your trip back on course, how they plan to assist you and what compensation they’re offering. They should try to book you onto another flight when possible,” he added.

In addition to communication, documentation is crucial. “Remember to keep all relevant documents like boarding passes, communications from your airline and receipts for accommodation or meal costs,” Jones advised. “Your airline should compensate these expenses. Know that you can complain to your airline if necessary, and even, if it isn’t being resolved, take your complaint to the UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) or an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) scheme.”

While many might assume that travel insurance covers such situations, Jones clarified that this isn’t always the case. “While travel insurance likely won’t cover you for overbooking, you should be able to claim compensation from your airline for certain costs incurred as a result, like if you missed your connection or have to cancel part of your trip.”

That said, he pointed out that some insurance plans include optional travel disruption cover. “And, some insurance policies do offer optional travel disruption cover, which can protect you if your airline fails to provide a suitable alternative flight. So it’s worth checking if your provider offers this, and the details of what’s included,” he noted.

The findings of the study underscore just how common the issue has become and highlight the importance of both airline accountability and passenger preparedness. While the practice of overbooking may make economic sense for carriers trying to maximize capacity, it has clear and often serious repercussions for travelers who expect a seamless journey.

The combination of the legal obligations imposed on airlines and the recourse options available to passengers suggests that being well-informed is one of the most powerful tools a traveler can have. As the data shows, millions have already faced the fallout from overbooking, and many more could be affected in the future unless there’s better transparency and a stronger push for consumer awareness.

The study ultimately calls attention to a practice that many may not even realize is occurring until they find themselves on the wrong side of the boarding gate. With proper awareness and understanding of one’s rights, passengers can mitigate the stress and potential financial burden of being denied boarding.

By knowing what steps to take—starting from getting written confirmation to preserving receipts and contacting the appropriate resolution bodies—travelers can increase their chances of receiving appropriate compensation and support.

In a time when air travel has resumed high volumes post-pandemic, the message is clear: vigilance and knowledge are essential. As Rhys Jones concluded, being prepared can make a world of difference if your flight plans suddenly go awry.

How Immigration Powers the U.S. Economy and Secures Future Prosperity

Immigration remains a powerful driver of the American economy, fueling growth, innovation, and economic resilience across sectors. Immigrants not only create jobs and raise wages but also reduce inflation, increase productivity, and contribute significantly to government revenues. Their presence enhances nearly every segment of the U.S. economy, particularly in critical areas such as healthcare, agriculture, construction, and rapidly developing fields like artificial intelligence and semiconductors.

This article highlights findings from various studies, including original research by FWD.us, showing how immigration delivers substantial benefits to the United States. As the brief notes, “Immigration will contribute to a $7 trillion increase in GDP and $1 trillion in additional government revenue over the next decade.”

Immigration is one of the most effective means of expanding and strengthening the U.S. economy. As the number of people purchasing goods and services rises, so too does the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), a primary measure of economic vitality. With this rise in demand, new businesses emerge, leading to job creation. One study found that immigrants are responsible for 17% of the U.S. GDP, which equals a staggering $3.3 trillion.

Because many immigrants are of working age and often possess strong entrepreneurial qualities, increased immigration leads to a rise in per capita GDP—essentially improving the average income per person. This translates to a higher standard of living and broader prosperity for the country.

Immigrants also play a critical role in funding public services through taxes. Every year, they contribute nearly $525 billion in taxes across federal, state, and local levels. These figures include contributions from refugees, asylum seekers, and undocumented individuals, who collectively pay close to $50 billion annually in taxes, despite having limited access to public benefits. These tax contributions help sustain key programs such as Social Security and ensure continued investment in schools, infrastructure, and other essential services.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) further supports these findings. In a report released in February, the CBO director stated that recent immigration trends have reduced the federal deficit. Over the next ten years, immigration is expected to generate a $7 trillion boost in GDP and contribute an additional $1 trillion in government revenue.

By contrast, limiting immigration would lead to a smaller economy, fewer jobs, and a reduction in the availability of goods and services. It could also undermine the country’s global economic leadership. The article warns that restricting immigration would leave the U.S. “smaller, poorer, and weaker.”

Immigrants are crucial to addressing workforce shortages and curbing inflation. As of 2022, immigrants accounted for 18.1% of the American labor force—a figure that continues to rise. Given that immigrants are more likely to be of working age, they help fill key gaps in industries facing chronic labor shortages.

In healthcare alone, immigrants make up over 18% of the workforce. This includes 26% of all physicians, 16% of registered nurses, and a striking 40% of home healthcare aides. These workers help alleviate the severe staffing crises in healthcare, many of which worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Moreover, newly arrived immigrants have been instrumental in resolving post-pandemic labor shortages and restoring disrupted supply chains. Many of these workers entered the U.S. through humanitarian parole and have played a pivotal role in stabilizing the economy.

Immigrants also have a strong presence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) occupations. Nearly 20% of all STEM workers are foreign-born. Additionally, international students make up about 40% of advanced STEM degree recipients in American universities. In areas like artificial intelligence and semiconductor manufacturing, their expertise is essential to keeping the U.S. at the forefront of innovation.

Research by FWD.us shows that immigration can ease inflation by closing labor market gaps that would otherwise drive consumer prices upward. In recent years, the increase in immigration has played a significant role in slowing inflationary trends and maintaining steady economic growth.

Immigrants are not only workers but also job creators. They establish new businesses at twice the rate of native-born Americans. In fact, 45% of Fortune 500 companies in 2023 were founded by immigrants or their children. Immigrants also founded 55% of U.S. startups that have achieved valuations of $1 billion or more.

There’s no evidence that immigrant workers displace native-born workers. On the contrary, immigration is linked to higher employment levels among Americans born in the U.S. While fears that immigration depresses wages are common, data shows minimal impact—and in many fields, especially those requiring high skills, immigrants actually help increase productivity and wage growth. Attempts to limit immigration often lead to outsourcing and job relocation to other countries, rather than improving employment prospects domestically.

Immigrants also significantly enhance American innovation. Despite making up only 16% of inventors in the U.S., they account for nearly a quarter of the country’s innovation output. Their contributions drive technological progress not only in the U.S. but globally.

Many of these innovators began their American journey as international students. During the 2022–2023 academic year alone, international students added $40.1 billion to the U.S. economy and supported more than 368,000 jobs.

Beyond the economy, immigration is also a demographic necessity. The U.S. population grew at its slowest rate between 2010 and 2020 since the 1930s, and the birth rate has continued to decline. Immigration helps counteract these trends by expanding the working-age population and encouraging family growth within the U.S. Immigrants also play vital roles in sectors that serve an aging population, particularly healthcare.

To maintain population stability and economic growth, the U.S. must raise immigration levels. FWD.us research indicates that increasing immigration by 50% annually would raise the working-age population by about 13% by 2040, providing a solid foundation to meet labor demands and support economic expansion.

This is especially crucial in rural America. Between 2000 and today, 77% of rural U.S. counties have seen a decline in working-age residents, which threatens local economies and reduces access to essential services. The study suggests that welcoming just 200 immigrants annually in these counties could reverse population decline in 71% of them by 2040.

Looking ahead, it is clear that immigration is not just beneficial but essential to America’s economic future. The data overwhelmingly supports the argument that immigrants help make the U.S. stronger and more prosperous. As the report concludes, “It is vital that U.S. policymakers should work to preserve and enhance the benefits of immigration by building new legal avenues and increasing opportunities for newcomers to support themselves, participate in their local communities, and contribute to the United States’ success and prosperity.”

Trump Wins 2024 Election with Broader Coalition and First Popular Vote Victory

In his third bid for the presidency, Donald Trump clinched a decisive victory over Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. Not only did he secure 312 Electoral College votes, but for the first time, he also won the national popular vote, defeating Harris by 1.5 percentage points. His success was fueled by a more diverse voter coalition compared to his earlier campaigns, as outlined in a new Pew Research Center study examining the 2024 electorate.

Among Latino voters, Trump made significant inroads, narrowing the gap considerably. While Joe Biden had defeated him among Hispanics by a wide margin in 2020 (61% to 36%), the 2024 figures were much closer, with Harris winning 51% and Trump securing 48%. This nearly even split suggests Trump made notable progress with this key demographic.

Black voter support for Trump also increased substantially. In 2020, he received just 8% of the Black vote. By 2024, that figure had climbed to 15%. Although Harris maintained majority support among Black Americans, the shift toward Trump signals an important change in voting behavior.

Asian American voters showed similar trends. While Harris earned the support of 57% of Asian voters, Trump won 40%. In comparison, Biden had captured 70% of the Asian vote in 2020, with Trump garnering only 30%. The narrowed margin in 2024 indicates Trump’s growing appeal among this group as well.

According to Pew, these shifts were mainly due to changes in voter turnout between 2020 and 2024 rather than widespread switching of party loyalty. Most voters stuck with the party they supported in the previous election. However, Trump gained from increased turnout among his 2020 supporters and an edge among new voters who did not participate in the 2020 election. This new voter group was significantly more diverse than those who voted in both years.

Despite Trump’s improved performance among various groups, many of the entrenched voting patterns that have characterized American politics for decades persisted. One of the most prominent was the divide in educational attainment. Trump continued to dominate among voters without a four-year college degree, widening his advantage to 14 percentage points (56% to 42%), double the margin he achieved in 2016. In contrast, Harris outperformed Trump among college-educated voters, winning 57% to his 41%. However, her lead was smaller than Biden’s margin in 2020.

The urban-rural divide also deepened. Trump captured rural voters by a massive 40-point margin, with 69% of rural residents backing him compared to just 29% for Harris. Meanwhile, voters in urban areas largely supported Harris, with 65% favoring her and 33% choosing Trump.

Religion continued to influence voter behavior. Pew found that nearly two-thirds of Americans who attend religious services at least monthly (64%) voted for Trump. In contrast, Harris was favored by 56% of those who attend services less frequently, while 43% of that group chose Trump.

Voter retention and turnout differences also played a critical role in Trump’s win. A larger portion of Trump’s 2020 supporters (89%) turned out again in 2024, compared to 85% of Biden’s 2020 voters. Additionally, among those who didn’t vote in 2020 but did in 2024, 54% supported Trump, while 42% voted for Harris.

Between the two elections, voter loyalty held steady for most. “About 85% of those who backed Trump in 2020 did so again in 2024,” Pew reported. Only 11% of his previous supporters did not vote in 2024, and 4% switched sides or supported another candidate. Harris retained the backing of 79% of Biden’s 2020 voters, but a slightly higher 15% of them didn’t vote, and 6% either chose Trump or someone else.

New and returning voters – those who had been eligible in 2020 but didn’t vote – also leaned toward Trump when they participated in 2024. Among this group, which includes those who were too young to vote in 2020, 14% voted for Trump and 12% for Harris. This indicates a modest advantage for Trump among first-time or returning voters.

Overall, voting behavior between 2020 and 2024 showed both consistency and change. About 75% of eligible adults repeated their 2020 behavior – either voting for the same party or sitting out both elections. The remaining quarter changed course by switching party allegiance, voting in 2024 after not voting in 2020, or abstaining in 2024 after voting in the previous election.

Despite the high stakes, Harris might not have gained significantly from a broader turnout. When Pew asked nonvoters how they would have voted, responses were nearly even: 44% said they would have backed Trump, while 40% said Harris. This contrasts with 2020, when nonvoters showed a clear preference for Biden over Trump (46% to 35%).

This suggests that even with full voter participation in 2024, the final result likely wouldn’t have changed much. Pew noted that in 2020, a full turnout would likely have increased Biden’s margin of victory, unlike in 2024 when the nonvoter pool leaned more evenly between both parties. “Democrats have held an edge among nonvoters in prior elections dating back to at least the 1960s,” Pew stated, “though there is some evidence this advantage had declined in recent elections.”

Among naturalized citizens – immigrants who have become U.S. citizens – support was nearly split. Harris won 51% of their votes, while Trump captured 47%. This marked a significant shift from 2020, when Biden had led this group by 21 points (59% to 38%). In the 2024 electorate, naturalized citizens accounted for 9% of all voters.

Trump also gained ground with male voters, especially younger men. Men overall favored Trump by a 12-point margin (55% to 43%), a notable increase from 2020 when the gender divide was narrower. Among men under 50, the race was nearly even in 2024, with 49% supporting Trump and 48% backing Harris. In 2020, this group had favored Biden by 10 points (53% to 43%).

Despite historically high voter engagement in recent elections, many Americans remain disengaged. The 2024 turnout rate stood at 64%, the second-highest since 1960, trailing only the 2020 turnout. Still, about 26% of eligible voters had no record of voting in any of the last three national elections. These nonparticipants were disproportionately younger and less likely to have college degrees than consistent voters.

Another notable development was the growth in early in-person voting. In 2024, 32% of voters cast their ballots in person before Election Day, up from 27% in 2020. Meanwhile, 34% voted in person on Election Day itself.

Pew’s analysis paints a complex picture of the 2024 election: while traditional voting patterns held firm in many areas, Trump’s outreach to more diverse demographics, combined with targeted voter turnout strategies, enabled him to secure a broader coalition and his first-ever win in the national popular vote.

India Turns Crisis into Opportunity by Boosting Defense Amid Middle East Conflict

India’s economy faced a precarious situation over the past week as geopolitical tensions between Israel and Iran threatened to escalate further. The nation stood at the edge of a potential economic crisis, but rather than being dragged into turmoil, India found a strategic opportunity in the unfolding events to enhance its domestic defense sector.

The conflict, which had global ramifications, culminated in a ceasefire agreement on Wednesday. This truce followed a U.S.-led bombing campaign that, according to President Donald Trump, eliminated Iran’s nuclear capabilities. The ceasefire brought some relief to global markets, leading to a drop in oil prices that had surged amid the conflict. With this development, India narrowly avoided a potential economic disaster, but the situation underscored the country’s dependence on foreign oil and its vulnerability to external shocks.

Although India stopped purchasing Iranian oil some time ago, it still relies heavily on oil transported through the Strait of Hormuz. Approximately 40% of its crude oil imports pass through this narrow and strategically crucial maritime route. Any disruption here would have resulted in significant economic consequences.

According to a report from SBI Research, every $10 increase in global crude oil prices could push up consumer price inflation in India by as much as 35 basis points and reduce GDP growth by 30 basis points. Madan Sabnavis, the chief economist at Bank of Baroda, emphasized the implications of such a price surge. While he noted that a 10% rise in oil prices might be manageable, he warned, “A sustained price above $100 per barrel can have a major impact.”

India also faces a complex diplomatic situation. On one hand, it has strategic investments in Iran, including the Chabahar port project which is managed by Indian companies. On the other, it shares a close defense relationship with Israel. This dual engagement presents a challenge as India seeks to maintain strong ties with both nations amid ongoing tensions.

The scale of India’s defense ties with Israel is significant. According to a March 2024 report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, India is Israel’s largest arms buyer, accounting for 34% of its total defense exports. In return, Israel contributes 13% of India’s arms imports.

This dependency on foreign arms was starkly visible during India’s recent military action dubbed “Operation Sindoor,” launched in retaliation to an April militant attack in Jammu and Kashmir. The operation combined older Russian equipment with modern Israeli systems like the Heron drones and Spyder and Barak-8 missile systems. Analysts at investment bank Jefferies highlighted this operation as evidence of India’s ongoing reliance on imported military technology.

India’s traditional defense partner, Russia, has become an increasingly unreliable supplier. Following the invasion of Ukraine, Russian military production has shifted toward meeting its own wartime needs, resulting in delays for countries like India. Furthermore, there are questions about the effectiveness of Russian military hardware. For example, equipment such as the T-90S tanks—widely used by the Indian Army—has reportedly not performed well in Ukraine, according to defense analysts.

In light of these developments, India recognizes the urgent need to pivot toward a more self-reliant defense strategy. However, making this transition won’t be easy or quick. Bernstein Research notes that as of 2023, about 90% of India’s armored vehicles and 70% of its combat aircraft were of Russian origin. Diversifying and localizing such a significant portion of defense infrastructure will take considerable time and resources.

Still, global developments are pushing India and other nations in the same direction. Anna Mulholland, head of emerging market equities research at Pictet Asset Management, observed, “I think undoubtedly the situation will have increased the desire and conviction that all the countries have to increase their defence spending, which was initiated because of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.” She added, “The Middle East turmoil, while not new, will surely have increased people’s resolve and commitment to those increased defence budgets that have been spoken about.”

India is attempting to transform this crisis into a strategic opening for its domestic defense industry. JPMorgan analysts described the current geopolitical climate as a “pivotal moment for widespread recognition of BEL’s capabilities.” BEL, or Bharat Electronics Limited, is a state-owned company that has seen its stock price rise roughly 38% this year.

Atul Tiwari, an executive director at JPMorgan, commented in a June 23 client note, “A steady stream of orders, elevated geopolitical risks both in India and globally, and strong medium-term growth prospects … with healthy [return on equity] should continue to lead to outperformance, in our view.”

One of the most prominent signs of India’s commitment to defense self-sufficiency is “Project Kusha,” a domestically developed alternative to the Russian S-400 air defense system. BEL plays a central role in this initiative. Tiwari added that the program “is expected to contribute significantly to the company’s long-term order book once contracts are finalized.”

India is not only investing in defense for its own needs but also aims to become a global exporter in this sector. According to Jefferies, the country is targeting a doubling of its defense exports to nearly $6 billion annually by the end of this decade.

Meanwhile, in the financial sector, the tentative ceasefire between Iran and Israel brought temporary relief. Dhiraj Nim of ANZ stated that although the spike in global oil prices poses risks for the Indian rupee, the truce “has helped stabilize investor sentiment and improved near-term outlook for the currency.”

Economists like Frederic Neumann of HSBC and Tim Seymour of Seymour Asset Management believe that emerging markets, particularly Korea, India, and Vietnam, remain undervalued and present attractive investment opportunities.

In other developments, Proseus, a major tech investor, projected that India will soon produce a $100 billion technology company. Proseus has backed major Indian tech firms like PayU and Meesho, further indicating growing investor confidence in the country’s innovation potential.

However, not all economic indicators are uniformly positive. The Reserve Bank of India reported that while manufacturing and services remained strong in May, there was a notable slowdown in urban consumption demand.

India’s aviation sector also made headlines. Air India, now owned by Tata Sons, received a capital injection of 9,588 crore rupees (around $1.1 million) from Tata and Singapore Airlines during the 2024-25 fiscal year. The airline is also grappling with the aftermath of a tragic air crash on June 12.

In the stock market, the Nifty 50 index climbed to a record high of 25,549 points as investor sentiment improved following the de-escalation of Middle East tensions. The index rose more than 2% over the past week and is up over 7% for the year. Meanwhile, the yield on India’s 10-year government bond declined by 3 basis points from the previous week, now trading at 6.27%.

As India weathers another round of global instability, its ability to adapt and seize opportunities—especially in the defense sector—signals a significant shift in economic and strategic thinking.

Elon Musk Sounds Alarm on Falling Birth Rates, Warns of Civilizational Collapse

Tech billionaire Elon Musk has once again voiced his growing concern over what he believes is humanity’s most significant existential threat: declining birth rates. Reacting to a recent social media post that cited a Fortune report on demographic trends, the Tesla and SpaceX founder stressed the alarming consequences of modern fertility patterns and emphasized the need for higher birth rates to avoid long-term societal collapse.

The discussion was triggered by a post shared on X (formerly Twitter) by user Mario Nawfal, who drew attention to findings suggesting that the often-cited replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman is no longer sufficient to maintain stable population levels. Nawfal wrote, “Scientists now say 2.1 kids per woman won’t cut it — 2.7 is the real number needed to avoid long-term extinction. Right now, the U.S. is at 1.66, and most rich countries are even lower, including Italy at 1.29 and Japan at 1.30.”

Nawfal explained that the revised figure of 2.7 children per woman takes into account various social and biological factors such as the growing number of people who remain childless and gender disparities at birth. In support of the post, Elon Musk reiterated the significance of addressing the trend by reposting Nawfal’s data and adding his own comment: “People who have kids do need to have 3 kids to make up for those who have 0 or 1 kid or population will collapse.”

Musk has long linked demographic decline to the downfall of great civilizations, most notably the Roman Empire. “Low birth rates were the primary factor in their downfall — shockingly overlooked by most historians,” Musk previously said, pointing out how historical societies failed to recognize the risks of unsustainable fertility levels. He considers the matter not just a demographic or statistical challenge, but a civilizational one, warning of long-term ramifications. As he put it, “If you don’t believe me now, just wait 20 years.”

His advocacy is not without personal commitment. Over the last 20 years, Musk has become a father to 14 children. His journey into parenthood began in 2002 with the birth of Nevada Alexander, his first child with then-wife Justine Wilson, a Canadian author. Tragically, Nevada died of sudden infant death syndrome at only ten weeks old. Musk and Wilson went on to have five more children: twins Vivian and Griffin, followed by triplets Kai, Saxon, and Damian. Since then, Musk has had additional children, making him one of the most high-profile figures to practice what he preaches in terms of contributing to population growth.

Concerns about declining fertility rates are not limited to Musk and independent commentators. International agencies are now addressing the issue with growing urgency. A new report from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), titled “The Real Fertility Crisis,” highlights the widespread nature of low fertility levels and the growing number of people unable to meet their desired family size.

“If you don’t believe me now, just wait 20 years,” Musk emphasized again in light of the UN’s findings.

The 2025 State of World Population (SOWP) Report by the UNFPA is particularly significant because it marks one of the agency’s most explicit acknowledgments to date of the challenges associated with global fertility decline. The report found that hundreds of millions of people globally are not having as many children as they would prefer. Two of the most commonly cited reasons are the escalating financial burden of childrearing and increasing difficulty in finding compatible partners.

India, the world’s most populous country, is also seeing fertility rates dip below the replacement threshold. According to the report, India’s total fertility rate has now decreased to 1.9 births per woman. This is a major shift from earlier decades when families in India were much larger. Andrea M Wojnar, UNFPA’s India Representative, credited the decline to improvements in education and better access to reproductive health services. “India has made significant progress in lowering fertility rates – from nearly five children per woman in 1970 to about two today, thanks to improved education and access to reproductive healthcare,” Wojnar said.

Musk’s alarmism may strike some as exaggerated, but his consistent messaging is gaining traction as more global data points to a steady decline in birth rates, particularly in developed and rapidly developing countries. He sees the risk as both mathematical and civilizational — a slow but potentially irreversible shift in the structure of human society. While some experts caution against overreaction, others acknowledge that fertility decline could lead to a host of economic and societal issues, such as aging populations, labor shortages, and reduced economic growth.

The UNFPA report seeks to clarify that the problem is not necessarily overpopulation, as previously believed, but rather the growing mismatch between fertility aspirations and reality. Economic pressures, career priorities, social isolation, and changing gender roles are all contributing to people choosing to have fewer or no children.

Elon Musk’s views place him among a small but vocal group of public figures calling for a reevaluation of societal attitudes toward parenthood and family size. His insistence that “people who have kids do need to have 3 kids” stems from the idea that demographic stability cannot be achieved if most people have only one or two children, especially when others have none. It’s a simple numbers game, he argues — one that humanity is currently losing.

By referencing ancient Rome and other past civilizations, Musk is also making a cultural and historical argument. He believes that like Rome, modern societies risk falling into decline if they fail to maintain robust population growth. His call to action isn’t just aimed at policymakers or economists but at everyday citizens who can help reverse the trend through family-building.

While some critics question whether increasing birth rates is the correct or most ethical solution — especially considering environmental concerns and resource distribution — the concern about aging populations and shrinking workforces is already playing out in countries like Japan, South Korea, and Italy. These nations are grappling with pension crises, labor gaps, and diminished innovation capacity due to shrinking youth populations.

Musk’s message, therefore, is as much a warning as it is a challenge. With his blend of data, historical context, and personal commitment, he continues to advocate for a fundamental rethink of modern reproductive priorities. As he warned once again, “If you don’t believe me now, just wait 20 years.”

AI Revolution Accelerates: Sam Altman Predicts a Future of Superintelligence, Robot Builders, and ‘Fake Jobs’

As Americans prepare for the Fourth of July, marking it with growing cornfields and rising fireworks tents, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has ignited a different kind of spark—one grounded in technological transformation. In a thought-provoking essay published on June 10, Altman shared his latest projections for the near future of artificial intelligence, with a notable emphasis on humanoid robots and self-sustaining AI systems.

Altman asserts that humanity has reached a pivotal moment in its evolution with AI. “We are past the event horizon; the takeoff has started,” he wrote. “Humanity is close to building digital superintelligence, and at least so far it’s much less weird than it seems like it should be.” According to him, developments once considered improbable or distant are now unfolding rapidly. Much of the foundational work in developing intelligent agents and robots, he suggests, is already complete.

Highlighting AI’s exponential growth, Altman cited ChatGPT as an example. “ChatGPT is already more powerful than any human who has ever lived,” he remarked. “Hundreds of millions of people rely on it every day and for increasingly important tasks; a small new capability can create a hugely positive impact; a small misalignment multiplied by hundreds of millions of people can cause a great deal of negative impact.”

He points to a phenomenon he calls a “self-reinforcing loop,” describing how the success and capability of AI are propelling rapid infrastructure development. This momentum, he argues, is laying the groundwork for even more significant automation. “The economic value creation has started a flywheel of compounding infrastructure buildout to run these increasingly-powerful AI systems,” he explained. “And robots that can build other robots (and in some sense, datacenters that can build other datacenters) aren’t that far off.”

Altman’s essay touches not just on the technical possibilities, but on how humanity is psychologically adapting to this rapid progress. He paints a picture of society quickly becoming accustomed to AI’s growing powers. The process, he says, turns the extraordinary into the ordinary.

“Already we live with incredible digital intelligence, and after some initial shock, most of us are pretty used to it,” Altman wrote. “Very quickly we go from being amazed that AI can generate a beautifully-written paragraph to wondering when it can generate a beautifully-written novel; or from being amazed that it can make life-saving medical diagnoses to wondering when it can develop the cures; or from being amazed it can create a small computer program to wondering when it can create an entire new company. This is how the singularity goes: wonders become routine, and then table stakes.”

His reflections also take on a historical perspective, exploring how technological advances shift our sense of purpose and redefine work. In an earlier essay, Altman had referenced the now-obsolete job of the lamplighter, who once lit street lamps before the advent of electric lighting. “Many of the jobs we do today would have looked like trifling wastes of time to people a few hundred years ago, but nobody is looking back at the past, wishing they were a lamplighter,” he wrote back then. “If a lamplighter could see the world today, he would think the prosperity all around him was unimaginable. And if we could fast-forward a hundred years from today, the prosperity all around us would feel just as unimaginable.”

In this latest essay, he replaces the lamplighter with a different metaphor: a subsistence farmer from a thousand years ago. Altman envisions how such a person would perceive the modern workplace and its seemingly trivial roles. “A subsistence farmer from a thousand years ago would look at what many of us do and say we have fake jobs, and think that we are just playing games to entertain ourselves since we have plenty of food and unimaginable luxuries,” he wrote. “I hope we will look at the jobs a thousand years in the future and think they are very fake jobs, and I have no doubt they will feel incredibly important and satisfying to the people doing them.”

While Altman acknowledges that job displacement is inevitable, he also sees a path toward previously unimaginable prosperity. He argues that society will not only survive but thrive amid these shifts. “The rate of technological progress will keep accelerating, and it will continue to be the case that people are capable of adapting to almost anything,” he stated. “There will be very hard parts like whole classes of jobs going away, but on the other hand the world will be getting so much richer so quickly that we’ll be able to seriously entertain new policy ideas we never could before. We probably won’t adopt a new social contract all at once, but when we look back in a few decades, the gradual changes will have amounted to something big.”

However, Altman also points out two significant challenges to this vision. The first is the “alignment problem”—the difficulty in ensuring that AI systems behave in ways that align with human values and objectives. This issue underscores the broader concern that AI might take actions that are logically sound but socially or ethically harmful. The second challenge is democratization—ensuring that access to AI technology is widespread and not concentrated in the hands of a few tech billionaires or companies. Both problems, Altman warns, are human in nature rather than technical.

Outside observers have weighed in on Altman’s bold vision, with a mixture of skepticism and intrigue. On the podcast AI Daily Brief, host Nathaniel Whittemore referenced a sharp critique from Jeffrey Miller of Primer.ai, who questioned the democratic legitimacy of Altman’s ambitions. “Democracy means absolutely nothing, and people don’t get to vote on whether we want the singularity, which probably leads straight to human extinction,” Miller said. “Do you support running a global referendum on whether we allow you guys to persist in trying to summon the superintelligent demons in the hope that they’ll play nice with us and destroy our current civilization gently?”

Whittemore also cited Ethan Mollick, a respected academic associated with MIT, who praised the specificity of Altman’s predictions. “One thing you could definitely say about Sam and Dario is that they are making very bold, very testable predictions,” Mollick noted. “We will know whether they are right or wrong in a remarkably short time.”

Mollick’s reference to Dario Amodei points to the broader chorus of voices predicting the rapid emergence of AI-powered robotics. Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, is known for his similarly bullish outlook. Nvidia’s Jensen Huang is another prominent figure echoing the sentiment, making it clear that belief in the rise of intelligent machines extends well beyond a single visionary.

So what happens when humanoid robots begin sharing workspaces with people—or perhaps replace them altogether? That’s one of the critical questions hanging over the AI boom. Will people adapt, or will the change be too fast and too deep?

Whittemore closes with a metaphor that encapsulates the gravity of Altman’s message. “This is basically the first alarm, followed by a snooze button for some of the most important conversations we’ll ever have as a human species.”

If that metaphor proves accurate, then humanity is at the brink of a journey that promises both exhilaration and uncertainty in equal measure. The next few years could redefine not just work and technology, but what it means to be human in a world of artificial minds.

-+=