Category: Politics

California Assemblyman Carl DeMaio plans to sue Governor Gavin Newsom over a new law he claims criminalizes citizen journalism amid concerns over rampant fraud in the state.

California’s Republican Assemblyman Carl DeMaio is preparing to file a lawsuit against Governor Gavin Newsom’s recently signed legislation, which he argues criminalizes citizen journalism. DeMaio warns that the law exacerbates the state’s ongoing issues with fraud.

Officially titled “Privacy for Immigration Support Services Providers,” the new law aims to establish privacy protections for immigration support service providers, including employees and volunteers. It shields their addresses and imposes penalties on individuals who publish their images on social media. DeMaio contends that the legislation effectively criminalizes the work of investigative journalists and seeks to “silence citizen journalists” while protecting taxpayer-funded organizations from public scrutiny.

“What does the Stop Nick Shirley Act do? It basically makes it illegal for a citizen journalist to document fraud involving taxpayer money and share that information online in the form of a video,” DeMaio told Fox News Digital.

Signed into law last week, the measure is set to take effect on October 1. DeMaio, alongside a coalition of civil liberty advocates, is preparing to challenge the law in court. “We have a plaintiff and are putting together the legal briefs,” he stated. “It is only a matter of time before we get before a judge to stop this act.”

He expressed hope that the U.S. Department of Justice would intervene in the case, describing the law as a clear infringement on First Amendment rights. “California’s fraud scandal makes the Minnesota fraud look like ‘garden variety government mismanagement,'” he added, drawing comparisons to other states’ issues with government oversight.

DeMaio criticized California’s handling of taxpayer funds, claiming that organizations receiving public money are not delivering the promised services. “They claim to provide public services to immigrants when, in fact, they organize rallies, harvest ballots, and endorse candidates during campaigns,” he said. “They are essentially an extension of the Democratic Party.”

The planned lawsuit follows discussions with the Justice Department’s Office for Civil Rights. “I have asked the U.S. Department of Justice to examine the Stop Nick Shirley Act to see if they can intervene to prevent its implementation,” DeMaio explained. “We have been dialoguing with the Department of Justice, and now we have a game plan to proceed in court to overturn this unconstitutional law.”

Addressing Governor Newsom directly, DeMaio stated, “Gavin Newsom, once again, you’re a bully trying to silence citizen watchdogs from exercising their First Amendment rights and exposing your fraud—the billions of taxpayer dollars wasted under your watch—all for the benefit of left-wing NGOs that support you politically.”

DeMaio accused Newsom and California’s Democratic supermajority of creating a “monumental problem” with taxpayer money, suggesting that the situation is intentional. “You’re going to be exposed as a bully,” he warned Newsom. “You’re going to be exposed as the fraud ringleader.”

In response, Newsom’s spokesperson, Diana Crofts-Pelayo, stated that “this law has nothing to do with Nick Shirley” and accused DeMaio and other Republicans of spreading misinformation. “The real controversy here is that MAGA Republicans are either lying to create fake conspiracy theories, or they simply do not know how to read,” she said.

Crofts-Pelayo emphasized that the law does not impact Shirley’s journalism, which Newsom’s office has previously criticized as “grifting” and “lying.” She asserted that the measure does not conceal fraud.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the offices of California Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Senate President pro Tempore Monique Limón for comment on the matter.

As the situation develops, the implications of this law and the potential legal challenges it faces will likely continue to draw attention from both sides of the political spectrum, highlighting the ongoing debate over transparency and accountability in government.

According to Fox News Digital, the controversy surrounding this legislation underscores the tensions between state governance and citizen oversight.

Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives accounted for nearly 75% of taxpayer-funded mail spending in the first quarter of 2026, according to congressional expenditure records.

In the first quarter of 2026, Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives accounted for nearly three-quarters of the approximately $1.47 million spent on taxpayer-funded mail. An analysis of congressional expenditure records revealed that Republicans spent around $1.09 million on franked mail, while Democrats spent slightly more than $371,000.

Franking privileges allow members of Congress to send official communications to their constituents without incurring postage costs from campaign or personal funds. These communications can include newsletters, notices about federal programs, questionnaires, and updates on a lawmaker’s activities. However, they cannot be used for campaign purposes, and mass mailings are generally prohibited during the 60 days leading up to an election in which the member is a candidate.

The analysis highlighted that the five highest-spending Republican representatives collectively spent more on franked mail than all House Democrats combined during the first quarter. On average, House members spent $3,383 during this period, with eleven lawmakers reporting expenditures exceeding ten times that amount; nine of these were Republicans.

Leading the House in franked mail spending was Republican Representative Jim Baird of Indiana, who reported $125,603 in expenses. This figure was approximately 45% higher than that of the next-biggest spender and represented more than 15% of his office’s overall expenditure for the quarter. Following Baird, Republican Representative Randy Feenstra of Iowa ranked second with $86,739, while Republican Representative David Schweikert of Arizona came in third with $83,808.

This spending pattern continues a broader trend in which House Republicans have consistently outspent Democrats on franked mail. According to a review of House expenditure data by LegiStorm, Republicans have outspent Democrats in this category every year of the current decade, often by margins exceeding 50%.

The most significant disparity in recent years occurred in 2025, when Republicans reportedly spent approximately $10.06 million on franked mail, compared to about $4.04 million by Democrats. This places Republican spending roughly 149% above the Democratic total for that year.

It is important to note that these figures do not determine whether specific communications complied with congressional restrictions, nor do they assess the content or effectiveness of the mailings. They merely reflect the amounts charged by congressional offices to the official mail category.

Franking privileges have been a part of the U.S. Congress since its early years, with rules evolving over time to differentiate official constituent communication from election campaigning and to disclose the public costs associated with such communications.

The House Communications Standards Commission oversees official communications sent by representatives, committees, and other House offices. Materials produced using official resources are subject to content, disclosure, and timing restrictions, including additional limitations surrounding election periods, according to IANS.

California state Senator Aisha Wahab has won a special election to succeed Eric Swalwell in Congress, marking a historic milestone as the first Afghan American to serve in the U.S. legislature.

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California state Senator Aisha Wahab will complete the term of former Representative Eric Swalwell after winning a special election on Thursday.

Swalwell, a Democrat who had been running for governor of California, resigned from Congress in April amid allegations of sexual assault and harassment, which he denies. Wahab will represent the state’s 14th Congressional District, which includes parts of Alameda County on the eastern side of the San Francisco Bay, until Swalwell’s term concludes in January.

Wahab’s election is historic; she becomes the first Afghan American to serve in Congress. The progressive Democrat triumphed over Bay Area Rapid Transit Director Melissa Hernandez, despite significant spending by outside groups opposing her candidacy in the final days of the campaign. Wahab stated that her victory demonstrates that her district “cannot be bought.”

“I will fight for this district that raised me,” Wahab said in a statement. “From foster care to Congress, this journey shows the possibility of the American Dream.”

The conclusion of the race to replace Swalwell comes as criminal investigations into the allegations against him are ongoing. Recently, federal agents seized electronic devices from Swalwell at the San Francisco airport and conducted a search of his home in Washington, D.C., according to a source familiar with the investigation who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Wahab made history in 2018 when she became the first Afghan American elected to public office in the United States, winning a seat on the Hayward City Council.

Throughout her time in the Legislature and during her campaign, Wahab has been a strong advocate for housing affordability and access. In 2023, she introduced a bill aimed at banning caste-based discrimination, which garnered national attention. However, the bill was vetoed by Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who stated that such discrimination is already prohibited under existing civil rights protections.

Wahab and Hernandez will face each other again in a separate election in November, which will determine who will serve a full two-year term in Congress.

Wahab won the primary decisively, but the general election saw a surge of outside spending in support of Hernandez. Groups affiliated with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) invested millions to support Hernandez and thousands to oppose Wahab.

During a candidate forum in April, Wahab responded affirmatively when asked if she considered the situation facing the Palestinian people to be genocide. In contrast, Hernandez, a moderate Democrat, did not provide a direct answer. She acknowledged Israel’s right to defend itself following the October 2023 attack by Hamas but expressed concern that “the destruction in Gaza has gone too far.”

Hernandez expressed pride in her competitive campaign against Wahab, stating, “I’ve been a fighter my whole life, and when I promised the residents of CA-14 I would fight for them, I never gave up.”

According to the Associated Press, Wahab’s victory marks a significant moment in California’s political landscape.

Portugal has enacted a law prohibiting face coverings in public, a measure primarily seen as targeting Muslim women, with specific exceptions outlined.

Portuguese President António José Seguro has officially enacted a law that largely prohibits individuals from covering their faces in public spaces. This legislation, often referred to as the “burqa law” by local media, has drawn attention for its perceived focus on Muslim women, according to a report by AFP.

The law includes several exceptions, allowing face coverings for health reasons, professional requirements, artistic expression, or due to weather conditions. Additionally, individuals are permitted to cover their faces while in places of worship, diplomatic missions, or when traveling on airplanes.

Violators of this new law may face fines ranging from 150 euros to 3,000 euros, which translates to approximately $175 to $3,500. The final version of the measure was adopted by the Portuguese parliament last month, reflecting a significant shift in public policy regarding face coverings.

According to the legislation, the ban specifically targets coverings that obscure a person’s face or hinder identification in public areas. It also prohibits any requirement for individuals to cover their faces based on gender, religion, age, or origin.

In a press release, President Seguro emphasized that an uncovered face is essential for fostering social trust, a fundamental aspect of Portuguese society. He stated, “Social integration, non-discrimination based on gender, and the security resulting from similar decisions by the European Court of Human Rights underpin this decision.” The president echoed the court’s belief that the face is central to human identity and communication, serving as a basic element for mutual recognition among citizens.

Furthermore, the president argued that requiring women to conceal their faces entirely creates an imbalance that contradicts the values of equality and dignity that are foundational to European democracies. He asserted that such practices are incompatible with the principles of parity that shape modern societies.

This law has sparked discussions about cultural identity, religious freedom, and women’s rights in Portugal and beyond. As European nations continue to grapple with issues surrounding immigration and integration, Portugal’s decision reflects a broader trend in the region regarding face coverings and public expression.

As the law takes effect, it remains to be seen how it will be enforced and how it will impact the lives of those affected, particularly Muslim women who may feel targeted by such regulations. The implications of this legislation will likely continue to be a topic of debate in both political and social spheres.

According to AFP, the enactment of this law marks a significant moment in Portugal’s legislative history, as it navigates the complexities of cultural diversity and national identity.

Amy Klobuchar faces criticism from her Republican opponent for failing to address Minnesota’s $250 million Feeding Our Future fraud scandal in over 1,000 press releases since 2022.

Minnesota Democratic gubernatorial candidate Amy Klobuchar is under scrutiny from her Republican opponent and social media critics for her silence on the state’s significant fraud scandal, known as the Feeding Our Future scandal. Despite issuing over 1,000 press releases since 2022, Klobuchar has not mentioned the scandal once.

A review by Fox News Digital found that Klobuchar’s Senate office has addressed various forms of fraud in its communications between 2022 and 2025, yet none of the press releases referenced the Feeding Our Future scandal or related issues. This scandal, which emerged in late January 2022, involves allegations of fraud totaling $250 million and has escalated into a broader social services fraud crisis that prosecutors estimate could reach $9 billion.

In examining Klobuchar’s press release archive from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2025, not a single release mentioned the Feeding Our Future scandal or included terms such as “Minnesota fraud,” “social services fraud,” “Medicaid fraud,” “autism fraud,” “Housing Stabilization Services,” “child nutrition fraud,” “DHS fraud,” or “nonprofit fraud.”

Republican House Speaker Lisa Demuth criticized Klobuchar’s lack of action during the scandal, stating, “As Feeding Our Future was breaking and all of the fraud that was being talked about, the absent voice that I was noticing was Senator Klobuchar.” She highlighted that Klobuchar, who has served as a senator for twenty years, could have held hearings on the issue but did not attend a recent hearing focused on fraud in Minnesota.

Demuth’s remarks came during a speech where she unveiled her plan to combat fraud, emphasizing the need for change in leadership. She pointed out the billions of taxpayer dollars that have been stolen and called for a new approach to governance.

Since announcing her candidacy for governor, Klobuchar has made fighting fraud a central theme of her campaign. In a recent ad, she promised to conduct a state audit on her first day in office, aiming to “root out waste, fraud, and abuse.” Klobuchar stated on social media, “It’s time for results, not excuses.”

As Klobuchar heads into the November election as the frontrunner to succeed Governor Tim Walz, who opted not to seek re-election amid the fraud scandal, Demuth argues that voters will remember Klobuchar’s record on fraud. “My question is, where were you for the last 10 years, but absolutely the last eight years?” Demuth asked. She noted that Klobuchar could have collaborated with Walz, whom she previously praised as an “exceptional governor,” during a time when the state was facing significant challenges.

Republican candidates in Minnesota are emphasizing that the fraud scandal has galvanized voters across party lines. Senate hopeful Michele Tafoya recently remarked that voters are “ready for a change,” reflecting a growing sentiment among constituents.

Demuth highlighted her own efforts to address fraud since becoming Minnesota House Speaker in 2025, including the establishment of the Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee. She posed a critical question to voters: “Who are Minnesotans gonna trust for their next governor? Somebody that has just decided to talk about fraud now that they’re running for office or someone that has been fighting fraud this entire time?”

Fox News Digital reached out to Klobuchar’s campaign for comment but did not receive a response.

According to Fox News Digital, Klobuchar’s record on fraud is becoming a focal point in her gubernatorial campaign as she seeks to address the concerns of Minnesota voters.

Nithya Raman faced backlash during the Los Angeles mayoral debate after her explanation for hiring a consulting firm linked to Graham Platner, a disgraced former Senate candidate, drew groans from the audience.

Nithya Raman, a member of the Los Angeles City Council and affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), encountered significant pushback during a recent mayoral debate. The crowd of Democrats reacted with loud groans and hisses when she struggled to justify her decision to hire the political consulting firm that managed the campaign of Graham Platner, a former Senate candidate from Maine who resigned amid allegations of sexual misconduct.

Platner, who also identifies as a socialist, had previously won the Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate in Maine but withdrew from the race in July following multiple allegations of sexual misconduct. His campaign had already been marred by controversy due to inflammatory statements and a tattoo that critics claim resembles a Nazi symbol. Despite his denials of the allegations, Platner’s association with the Democratic Party has become a source of embarrassment for many within the party, particularly after several prominent figures expressed their support for him.

During the debate, the moderator posed a direct question to Raman: “It was reported that you’ve hired the same political consulting firm that managed Graham Platner’s campaign in Maine, who had to resign amidst sexual assault allegations. Is that true? And is that the best choice? And why did you make that decision?”

Raman responded by stating, “Well, I did hire an advertising agency to make my paid ads, who also worked with Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s successful campaign.” This statement prompted a wave of discontent from the audience, with several attendees expressing their displeasure audibly.

Despite the backlash, Raman continued her defense, asserting that the firm had been involved in “many, many other successful campaigns across the entire city.” She emphasized her commitment to winning the race, stating, “I’ve retained most of my good campaign staff … we’ve made sure to invest in our team, and I hope that we can win this seat, and I’m going to work as hard as I can to win.”

The moderator pressed further, asking, “Did you weigh the pros and cons of being associated with Graham Platner’s campaign?” Raman replied, “Absolutely. But we wanted to make sure that we were hiring good people to make our ads.” However, she stumbled over her words, saying, “We we we we weighed the issues,” which further fueled the crowd’s discontent.

Following this exchange, Raman criticized incumbent Mayor Karen Bass, also a Democrat, regarding a recent incident involving one of Bass’s advisors. She highlighted a situation where the advisor was simultaneously engaged in crisis communications for a company under scrutiny due to a significant warehouse fire in Los Angeles, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest. “That, to me, is a real, real, real problem,” Raman remarked.

The moderator then turned to Bass, asking, “That wasn’t a good look, was it?” Bass agreed, stating, “Absolutely not,” and added that the situation “should not have happened.” However, she questioned the relevance of the inquiry to the previous question posed to Raman, stating, “I guess it’s a question of judgment.” Bass further clarified, “Well, if I had known that person was doing that, that person would not have been advising me. When I realized it, they stopped advising me.”

As the debate unfolded, it became clear that both Raman and Bass are vying for the position of mayor in one of the largest cities in the United States. Raman secured a spot on the November ballot after narrowly defeating Republican candidate Spencer Pratt in a late surge of support.

Fox News Digital reached out to both Raman and Bass for additional comments, as well as to Platner, the DSA, and Mamdani’s office for their perspectives on the matter.

According to Fox News, the dynamics of the debate highlighted the challenges both candidates face as they navigate a competitive political landscape.

Republican New York Attorney General candidate Saritha Komatireddy has accepted an invitation to a debate while urging her opponent, Letitia James, to join her in statewide discussions.

NEW YORK, NY – Saritha Komatireddy, the Republican candidate for New York Attorney General, has confirmed her participation in a debate hosted by Spectrum News as part of the 2026 general election. This invitation comes from the Public Campaign Finance Board, and Komatireddy is using this opportunity to challenge incumbent Attorney General Letitia James to engage in a series of debates across the state.

Komatireddy, who previously served as a federal prosecutor, has emphasized the importance of reaching voters beyond New York City. She has called for debates to be held in various cities, including Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Utica, Albany, and Binghamton, to ensure that all New Yorkers have the chance to hear from both candidates regarding their records and priorities.

“I have accepted the PCFB debate, and I hope Letitia James will do the same,” Komatireddy stated. “But one debate is not enough for a race this important. New Yorkers from Buffalo to Long Island deserve the opportunity to hear directly from both candidates about our records, our priorities, and what we will do as Attorney General.”

In her call for additional debates, Komatireddy has highlighted key issues that she believes should be addressed, including public safety, homelessness, mental illness, Medicaid and taxpayer fraud, corruption, and the appropriate role of the Attorney General’s office.

As the campaign progresses, the dialogue surrounding these debates is expected to intensify, with both candidates likely to outline their visions for the future of New York’s legal landscape.

According to India West, Komatireddy’s push for statewide debates underscores her commitment to transparency and accessibility in the electoral process.

Congressman Suhas Subramanyam supports a Pakistani Supreme Court decision to transfer former Prime Minister Imran Khan to a hospital, emphasizing the need for continued advocacy for his human rights and medical care.

WASHINGTON, DC – Congressman Suhas Subramanyam has expressed his approval of a recent ruling by the Pakistani Supreme Court that orders the transfer of jailed former Prime Minister Imran Khan to a hospital. However, he stressed that ongoing pressure is necessary to ensure Khan’s human rights and access to adequate medical care.

“I welcome the news that former Prime Minister Imran Khan will be moved to Shifa International Hospital in Islamabad,” Subramanyam stated. “Since his time in custody, reports have revealed sustained eye damage, general health concerns, and prolonged solitary confinement. Hospitalization and access to his personal physician and family are needed steps in the right direction. But we must continue to advocate for Mr. Khan’s human rights and access to care,” he added.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan ordered Khan, who is 73 years old, to be transferred from Rawalpindi’s Adiala jail to Shifa International Hospital for medical examinations. Khan’s political party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, had been seeking hospital treatment for him for several months.

Justice Shahid Waheed, who presided over the case, announced that Khan would be moved within two days. Uzair Bhandari, one of Khan’s lawyers, noted that the three-member bench also mandated the formation of a medical board to oversee Khan’s treatment. This board will include Khan’s sister, Dr. Uzma Khan, and his personal physician, Dr. Faisal Sultan.

Additionally, the court directed that Khan’s family be permitted to visit him at the hospital and that he be allowed to communicate with his sons, who reside abroad. The next hearing in Khan’s case is scheduled for September 16, and according to his lawyer, Khan is expected to remain in the hospital until at least that date. This would mark the longest duration he has spent outside of prison since his detention began.

Earlier this year, Khan received hospital treatment for an eye condition, with his family and lawyer reporting that he had lost most of the vision in his right eye.

Subramanyam previously led a bipartisan group of 13 members of the U.S. House of Representatives in sending a letter to U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on August 11. In this letter, the lawmakers expressed their concerns regarding the detention conditions of Khan and his wife, Bushra Imran Khan.

The letter highlighted reports indicating that Khan had been confined to his cell for up to 23 hours a day and had suffered significant eye damage. It also raised alarms about Bushra Khan’s access to clean drinking water, food, family visits, and medical treatment.

“We request that the State Department review these concerns and assess the current status of Mr. and Ms. Khan’s conditions,” the lawmakers wrote. “Moreover, we urge the Department to address their continued detention and human rights directly with the Government of Pakistan.”

The letter was signed by notable Indian-American lawmakers, including Ro Khanna and Pramila Jayapal, as well as Frank Pallone Jr. Other signatories included Joe Wilson, Gus Bilirakis, James McGovern, Donald Beyer Jr., Ilhan Omar, Greg Casar, Johnny Olszewski Jr., Rashida Tlaib, and James Walkinshaw.

As the situation develops, Subramanyam’s advocacy highlights the ongoing international concern regarding the treatment of political figures in Pakistan and the importance of human rights in the region.

According to IANS, the developments surrounding Khan’s health and legal status remain a focal point for both domestic and international observers.