Tag: DeshKaVikaas
BJP’s Triumph in Maharashtra and Challenges in Jharkhand Highlight Contrasting Electoral Fortunes
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath emerged as the star campaigners for the BJP-led alliance in Maharashtra. Complementing their efforts, Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde’s “Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin Yojana,” launched in June, played a significant role in securing a landslide victory for the ruling coalition. This three-party alliance, also known as the Mahayuti, drew immense support from women voters who turned out in large numbers, shaping the outcome decisively.
This triumph in Maharashtra follows closely after the BJP’s success in the Haryana Assembly elections, acting as a major morale booster for the party’s cadre. The BJP’s performance in the Lok Sabha elections earlier had left the party somewhat dispirited due to its failure to secure an outright majority. However, this sweeping win has revived enthusiasm and reaffirmed Amit Shah’s reputation as a “modern-day Chanakya and master strategist.”
The BJP is poised to secure over 125 seats in Maharashtra, making it the largest party within the Mahayuti alliance. Meanwhile, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena is expected to win more than 50 seats, with the Ajit Pawar faction of the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) also performing remarkably well. In stark contrast, the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA), comprising the Congress, Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena, and Sharad Pawar-led NCP, has suffered a significant defeat. This poor performance raises doubts about whether any of its constituents can even stake a claim for the Leader of the Opposition position in the state Assembly.
Eknath Shinde’s supporters have already begun portraying him as the inheritor of Bal Thackeray’s legacy, claiming the election results reflect this shift. However, for NCP veteran Sharad Pawar, the elections have been a decisive blow. His nephew, Ajit Pawar, has emerged as the stronger leader within the NCP, potentially signaling the end of Sharad Pawar’s political dominance.
Despite the Mahayuti’s victory, uncertainty looms over who will assume the chief minister’s position in Maharashtra. While Eknath Shinde currently holds the office, speculation is rife about whether BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis, who was instrumental in the party’s resounding success, will reclaim the role. The choice of chief minister is now the “million-dollar question” in the state’s political landscape.
In contrast to the BJP’s success in Maharashtra, the party faced significant setbacks in Jharkhand. The BJP attempted to intensify its campaign around the issue of Bangladeshi infiltration but underperformed in the elections. Additionally, divisive and inflammatory speeches targeting minority communities, particularly by Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, seem to have backfired, costing the party valuable support.
In Jharkhand, the Adivasi population once again expressed strong confidence in the leadership of Chief Minister Hemant Soren. Soren accused the central government of attempting to jail him on fabricated charges, a narrative that resonated with voters. His government’s welfare initiatives, such as the Maiya Samman Yojana and the Sarvajan Pension Yojana, contributed significantly to his electoral success.
One of the central issues in the Jharkhand elections was Soren’s arrest in January over an alleged land scam. This controversy became a focal point of the INDIA bloc’s campaign, enabling them to connect with voters effectively. The election results underscore the impact of these accusations and the resulting solidarity among his supporters.
Maharashtra’s decisive victory has rejuvenated the BJP, while the challenges in Jharkhand reflect areas requiring strategic reassessment. The contrasting outcomes highlight the complexities of Indian electoral politics and the nuanced approach required to appeal to diverse voter bases.
Transforming Indian Tourism: Gajendra Singh Shekhawat’s Vision for a Global Destination
Gajendra Singh Shekhawat, India’s Minister of Culture and Tourism, is spearheading a transformative agenda to position India as a premier global destination in the wake of a robust post-pandemic tourism rebound. Drawing from his extensive background in water conservation and agriculture, Shekhawat envisions a tourism and hospitality sector that not only drives economic growth but also celebrates India’s rich cultural heritage and natural beauty.
Cultural Heritage: The Bedrock of Tourism
“Tourism in India is embedded in our culture and DNA,” Shekhawat remarked during an interview in Delhi, underscoring the country’s historical connection to travel. He highlighted how ancient pilgrimage routes and diverse traditions continue to attract travelers globally. With infrastructural advancements under Prime Minister Modi’s leadership, including 150,000 kilometers of new roads and a doubling of airports, India is better equipped than ever to cater to this growing interest. These developments, he asserts, are vital in improving India’s global tourism standing.
Domestic Tourism and the Emerging Middle Class
Shekhawat emphasized the importance of domestic tourism, propelled by the rise of a burgeoning middle class. “More than 25 crore people have risen above the poverty line, significantly increasing the size of the middle-income group,” he noted. This aspirational segment is expected to drive demand for diverse travel experiences within the country, ensuring steady growth in the tourism sector.
Sustainability as a Core Principle
Sustainability is central to Shekhawat’s tourism strategy. Leveraging his expertise from the Ministry of Jal Shakti, he has prioritized eco-friendly initiatives to preserve India’s natural and cultural heritage. “We must balance preservation with promotion,” he said, detailing efforts to establish eco-resorts, nature reserves, and guided adventure experiences adhering to strict environmental guidelines.
One notable innovation is the “green leaf concept,” a five-leaf rating system recognizing hotels adopting sustainable practices like water recycling and sanitation. This initiative aims to foster environmentally responsible tourism while enhancing the traveler’s experience.
Technology Integration for Enhanced Travel
Shekhawat highlighted the launch of Incredible India’s digital platform, which simplifies travel planning by offering destination search, itinerary customization, and booking services. Virtual tours and comprehensive travel guides are also part of the Ministry’s digital transformation efforts, making Indian tourism more accessible to tech-savvy visitors. “Our digital platforms are gateways to India,” he explained, emphasizing their role in attracting and accommodating global tourists.
Addressing Workforce Challenges
The hospitality sector, significantly impacted by the pandemic, faces a shortage of skilled manpower. To bridge this gap, Shekhawat’s ministry has partnered with hotel chains through memorandums of understanding (MOUs) to align training with industry requirements. Programs like ‘Pariyatan Mitra’ and ‘Pariyatan Didi’ train local youth as cultural ambassadors, enriching the visitor experience with engaging narratives.
Collaborative Infrastructure Development
Infrastructure development remains a cornerstone of Shekhawat’s vision. By collaborating with state governments and other ministries, his team is addressing issues like over-tourism in popular destinations. The Ministry promotes lesser-known locales and invests in local infrastructure to create a balanced tourism ecosystem. States like Goa, Jammu and Kashmir, and Rajasthan have already benefited from these initiatives. Additionally, a special budgetary scheme offers states a 50-year interest-free loan for tourism infrastructure development, without adding to their debt burdens.
Attracting Investments and Promoting Niche Tourism
The tourism sector’s allowance of 100% Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has attracted $18 billion in foreign investments over the past two years, signaling robust growth potential. Shekhawat praised Rajasthan’s comprehensive hospitality policies, which serve as a model for other states. Niche markets like adventure, wedding, and wellness tourism are also gaining traction, further diversifying India’s tourism offerings.
Shekhawat sees India’s wellness traditions, rooted in Ayurveda and yoga, as unique assets with global appeal. Similarly, medical tourism is expected to flourish, driven by India’s growing credibility in healthcare.
The Road Ahead
Tourism currently contributes about 6-7% to India’s GDP, but Shekhawat anticipates this figure could rise to double digits with better integration of formal and informal sector data. By 2047, he envisions tourism evolving into a $3 trillion industry. Encouraging young professionals to join this dynamic field, he remarked, “Tourism and hospitality are set to become the biggest drivers of India’s economy.”
Shekhawat’s vision aligns economic growth with cultural preservation, sustainability, and innovation, ensuring a thriving tourism sector that doubles as a source of national pride and a beacon for global progress.
Indian American Republicans Welcome President-elect Trump’s Pick of Marco Rubio as Secretary of State
Indian American Republicans have commended President-elect Donald Trump for nominating Marco Rubio for Secretary of State, emphasizing that he will play a key role in furthering US-India relations.
Senator Rubio, a former Presidential candidate, who previously openly opposed President Trump’s policies, will now work to implement Trump’s foreign policy agenda. Marco Rubio will most likely be the next Secretary of State as the Republican party holds the majority in the US Senate.
Highlighting the importance of the U.S.-India relationship, the US Senator from Florida, recently said that bolstering ties with New Delhi is crucial for addressing the challenges posed by Beijing. He noted in a statement, “It is essential to enhance our strategic diplomatic, economic, and military relationship with New Delhi.”
On July 25, 2024, Marco Rubio announced the introduction of the U.S.-India Defense Cooperation Act, which seeks to expand bilateral cooperation amid rising tensions between India and China. The proposed Act would elevate India’s status to that of key U.S. allies like Japan, Israel, South Korea, and NATO members in terms of technology transfers. It also authorizes the Secretary of State to negotiate a memorandum of understanding to deepen military collaborations with India.
Rubio emphasized, “Communist China continues to aggressively expand its domain in the Indo-Pacific region, all while it seeks to impede the sovereignty and autonomy of our regional partners. It’s crucial for the U.S. to continue its support in countering these malicious tactics. India, along with other nations in the region, is not alone.”
The legislation establishes a U.S. policy to support India in countering threats to its territorial integrity by providing security assistance, and enhancing cooperation in defense, space, technology, medicine, and economic investments. It proposes a limited exemption for India from CAATSA sanctions on Russian military equipment and encourages expedited approval of defense-related sales to bolster India’s capacity to deter threats, aligning with U.S. interests in peace and stability.
The legislation seeks to deepen U.S.-India defense ties by expediting excess defense articles to India for two years, granting it ally-like status, and expanding military education and training cooperation. It also mandates a report on Pakistan’s use of force, including terrorism against India, and restricts U.S. security assistance to Pakistan if it sponsors terrorism.
Executive Director of the American Hindu Coalition, Alok Srivastava, told South Asian Herald, “I welcome President Trump’s choice of Marco Rubio to serve as Secretary of State,” highlighting that Rubio serves as the vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and is a member of the Foreign Relations Committee. He previously held the position of Speaker of the Florida Assembly.
Known for championing human rights, democracy, and strong national security, Rubio has consistently been a vocal critic of authoritarian regimes and an advocate for U.S. global leadership, noted Srivastava.
“Rubio views India as a key ally in countering China’s influence in the Indo-Pacific. He supports India’s role in maintaining regional stability and advancing democratic values, aligning with U.S. strategic interests. Rubio also supports the Quad alliance (U.S., India, Japan, Australia) and advocates for a free and open Indo-Pacific,” he expressed,
Chair of the Virginia Asian Advisory Board, Srilekha Palle, pointed out Rubio’s significant role in shaping foreign policy, adding that he has actively contributed to bipartisan efforts to strengthen international relations.
Palle told South Asian Herald, “Senator Rubio’s commitment to fortifying India’s security and sovereignty through the U.S.-India Defense Cooperation Act is a pivotal step in maintaining regional stability and countering aggressive overtures in the Indo-Pacific. This legislation not only strengthens our defense ties but also upholds our shared values of democracy and mutual respect.”
Palle praised Senator Marco Rubio’s initiative to elevate India as a NATO-level strategic partner, emphasizing his recognition of India’s pivotal role in maintaining peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. She stated, “This partnership will deepen our military collaborations and enhance strategic alignment on global security issues.”
Former Virginia Lieutenant Governor Candidate, Puneet Ahluwalia referred to Rubio as a “great choice,” of President Trump’s “Peace through Strength” foreign policy.
Ahluwalia told South Asian Herald, “He will be assertive with China to counter their actions in South China Sea and Indo-Pacific region. Rubio’s introduction of US-India Security Partnership shows his willingness to take on China as they may try to get a direct line with President Trump.”
Ahluwalia noted that Rubio’s expertise, shaped by his experience on foreign relations and intelligence committees, equips him to address critical challenges facing the U.S. and its allies. He expressed confidence that Rubio would pursue a negotiated settlement to the Ukraine-Russia war, support Israel in securing its future, and advocate for a peaceful resolution to the longstanding Palestinian issue, working in collaboration with Arab nations.
Ahead of Prime Minister Modi’s state visit on June 22, 2023, Senator Rubio also reaffirmed his commitment to strengthening U.S.-India relations.
“As we extend a warm welcome to Prime Minister Modi, it is crucial that the Biden Administration, and the U.S. Congress, prioritize this incredibly important relationship. Our nations’ economic and security interests overlap on many of the most pressing issues, especially the growing hostility of the Chinese Communist Party in the Himalayas and in the Indian Ocean,” Rubio noted in a statement. “We find ourselves at a new juncture in global history in which both India and the United States can further strengthen this vital partnership and build upon the foundation of our shared democratic values and national interests.”
Legacy of a Visionary Leader: Remembering Krishna V Srinivasa
Krishna V Srinivasa, a remarkable leader and the Executive Director of the US India Security Council, passed away on November 18, 2024, in Florida, leaving behind an enduring legacy. Renowned for his pioneering work in fostering US-India relations and revolutionizing the IT industry, his contributions have been instrumental in shaping the future of these two democracies.
A visionary in software development and IT staffing, Krishna V Srinivasa was among the first to bring Indian programmers to the United States during the 1980s. His company, Professional Consulting Services, led the way in software development, data processing, and staffing solutions. Under his guidance, many IT enterprises flourished, including the US operations of Tata Consulting Services (TCS). He served as a mentor to numerous emerging IT companies that later evolved into significant industry players.
Krishna’s advocacy for US-India relations was a testament to his unwavering commitment to strengthening the ties between the two nations. He collaborated closely with several influential US presidents and lawmakers, including President Ronald Reagan, President George H.W. Bush, President George W. Bush, Speaker Newt Gingrich, Senator John McCain, and congressmen like Gary Ackerman, Benjamin Gilman, Joseph Crowley, and Bob Menendez. These relationships allowed him to play a pivotal role in shaping policies that enhanced US-India partnerships.
He also worked closely with prominent Indian leaders, including Prime Ministers Rajiv Gandhi, P.V. Narasimha Rao, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Manmohan Singh, and Narendra Modi. Notably, Krishna played a key role in negotiating with the Indian government during the late 1980s to permit American planes to refuel during the Iraq combat under President H.W. Bush.
Another significant achievement was his involvement in the landmark US-India Civil Nuclear Deal. Krishna collaborated with the late Senator John McCain to ensure the signing of the US-India strategic defense agreement, further cementing the partnership between the two nations.
Krishna was deeply involved with the Indian American Forum for Political Education, mentoring many Indian American leaders and contributing to its advocacy efforts during the 1980s and 1990s. As the organization’s president during the mid-1980s, he spearheaded impactful advocacy on Capitol Hill, promoting stronger ties between the US and India.
During President Reagan’s administration, Krishna served as a delegate to the National White House Conference on Small Business, reflecting his influence and stature within the community.
Born on June 27, 1944, in Chandavaram, Andhra Pradesh, Krishna was the son of Rama Bhupala Sarma and Lakshmi Narasamma Chaturvedula. He pursued a BA in Economics from Narasaraopeta College and later earned an MA in Economics from Andhra University, receiving the Golden Award for his academic excellence. After moving to the United States in 1969, he completed an MBA at Emory University, marking the beginning of an illustrious career.
Krishna was predeceased by his parents, his elder brother Mallikarjuna Sarma, and his sister Rajyalakshmi. He is survived by his brothers Koteswar Krishna (and wife Vijaya) and Narasimha Murthy Krishnavajhala (and wife Lakshmi). He is also survived by his daughter, Srilaxmi Krishnavajhala Hall, her husband Charles Hall, and four grandchildren: Lakshana Hall, Lalitha Hall, Teja Hall, and Koty Hall. His extended family includes nephews, nieces, and grand-nieces and nephews, all of whom cherished his presence in their lives.
Krishna V Srinivasa will be remembered not only for his professional achievements but also for his personal qualities. Known for his soft-spoken demeanor, sharp wit, and kind heart, he touched countless lives and helped numerous individuals achieve their dreams.
As we bid farewell to this extraordinary leader, we pray for his soul to rest in peace, honoring the indelible mark he left on the world.
George Abraham, IOCUSA Vice-Chair Deplores The Renewed Violence In Manipur
‘We strongly deplore the dastardly acts of the Arambai Tenggol and Meitei extremists who are once again engaging in killings and burning down houses of worship and vandalizing and destroying houses and properties belonging to the Kuki-Zomi-Hmar indigenous tribes in the Jiribam town, Manipur. We equally condemn the killing of six Meitei women and children by the armed thugs who have precipitated the current flare-up. It once more illustrates the abject failure of the Modi-Shah government in restoring peace in Manipur and rehabilitating the displaced,’ said George Abraham, Vice-Chair of the Indian Overseas Congress, USA.
Some would argue that these issues have been complex and based on historical grievances between various tribes. However, to any independent observer, Arambai Tenggol groups encouraged by radical Hindutva elements have not only targeted Christian Churches and Institutions belonging to Kuki-Zo but also the Meitei tribe in the last several months. It appears to be a calculated and orchestrated attempt targeting primarily the Christian minority in the state regardless of their tribal origins.
It is mind-boggling to see Prime Minister Modi and External Affairs Minister Jaishankar expressing concerns about the safety and religious freedom of Overseas Indians who live in Western democracies where their civil rights are better protected while doing nothing to protect their citizens in a state ruled by a BJP government. Isn’t it also ironic to see our leaders trying to broker peace between Ukraine and Russia while standing idle and looking helpless to settle the disputes and end violence mostly between Hindu and Christian tribes? We urge the Central Government to prioritize the safety of its citizens in Manipur, showing the same level of zeal they exhibit towards foreign governments.
The BJP government under Biren Singh has totally failed in protecting the life and properties of all its citizens, regardless of their religious affiliations, and the people have lost confidence in his capacity or willingness to arrest the ongoing violence and killings. Therefore, we urge the Mod government to intervene quickly and take steps to bring about long-lasting peace and rehabilitation of thousands of Kuki-Zo people who are still living in the refugee camps.
Shomik Chaudhuri Receives 2024 International Impact Book Award For His Book, ‘Some Whispers From Eternity’
Some Whispers from Eternity, a book by Shomik Chaudhuri, has received the prestigious 2024 International Impact Book Award in Phoenix, Arizona.
The book is on the evolution of consciousness and upliftment of humanity through the practice of OM Kriya Yoga, an ancient yoga system of India practiced by numerous renowned saints including Lahiri Mahasaya, Paramahamsa Yogananda among numerous others. OM Kriya Yoga is a simplified modification of the original Kriya Yoga to make it conducive for common people to practice and evolve themselves. Shomik received initiation in OM Kriya Yoga by the second youngest Jagadguru RamanandacharyaRajivlochanacharya after Adi Shankaracharya. Jagadguru received his initiation into OM Kriya Yoga from Mahavatar Kriya Babaji, the mystical immortal siddha who is referenced in numerous books on spirituality including ‘An Autobiography of a Yogi’.
While accepting the award, Shomik said that the world is at acrossroads. We can go down the present path and probably face human and even life extinction and also probably destroy the planet.
The other road is to work together to create a human family globally where people live like family, with love, compassion, and cooperation, peacefully, helping each other evolve their consciousness to a higher state of living. When the human consciousness evolves towards divinity away from the artificial vivisections of the society that we have created, then only will the Oneness of the whole creation dawn on humanity and the realization that we are all connected and One, will be realized. Everything that we do will be of higher quality and value.
Yogic processes practiced over thousands of years in the Indian Sub-continent, explore this process of arousing one’s innate energies and using them to evolve the consciousness to the divine level. That will be the creation of Life Divine.
The book elaborates step by step on the entire process of OM Kriya Yoga, as learned by Shomik.
International Impact Book Awards
International Impact Book Awards was started in 2019 by the Phoenix, Arizona-based Nim Stant, an internationally bestselling author herself, which seeks to celebrate impactful stories that resonate with excellence.
About the Author
Shomik Chaudhuri is a renowned author for over 30 years. His work has been published in renowned daily newspapers like The Statesman, The Asian Age in Kolkata, India; United Nations Chronicle, New York, USA; weekly newspapers like News India Times, Desi Talk, The South Asian Times and numerous magazines and publications. He has over two decades of education and training including at Harvard and Cornell Universities, USA. He is also an iconic personality in the Indian American print media world being the CEO and COO of some of the largest newspaper groups in the USA. His deep interest, insight and knowledge on spirituality and our human existence made him the youngest person in United Nations history to represent the organization to the World Summit for Social Development, Copenhagen, Denmark, in March 1995. He co-founded an NGO at the United Nations which introduced spirituality as an essential part of human existence after which the UN gave adequate attention to this most important aspect of human existence. He also co-founded an international NGO based in India which is in Special Consultative Status with ECOSOC of the United Nations. It has branches in New York and Europe for now. He has been an ardent practitioner of spiritual austerities from childhood and has been practicing Kriya Yoga for over 5 decades. His deep interest and passion for spiritual wisdom led him to associate with God-realized saints and was initiated in OM Kriya Yoga by Jagadguru RamanandacharyaRajivlochanacharya in 1999. He wants to use his knowledge to help people globally uplift themselves spiritually and attain Life Divine.
Some Whispers from Eternity is a 192-page paperback with a retail price of $18.00 (eBook $13.00). The ISBN is 979-8-89027-386-4. It was published by Dorrance Publishing Co., Inc of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. For members of the press, to request a review copy, visit our virtual pressroom at https://dorrancepressroom.com/some-whispers-from-eternity-book-on-evolution-of-consciousness-and-upliftment-of-humanity-through-om-kriya-yoga/ or to buy the book visit our online bookstore at https://bookstore.dorrancepublishing.com/some-whispers-from-eternity-book-on-evolution-of-consciousness-and-upliftment-of-humanity-through-om-kriya-yoga/.
Tulsi Gabbard’s Controversial Nomination for Director of National Intelligence Raises Concerns
Donald Trump’s announcement of Tulsi Gabbard as his nominee for director of national intelligence has sparked intense debate, with critics from both major political parties voicing objections. Gabbard’s connections to a politically active Hindu organization, the Science of Identity Foundation (SIF), and her past political affiliations are under scrutiny.
John Bolton, former national security advisor, called her nomination “one of the nation’s worst,” while Democratic leaders have labeled her a “Russian asset” and a “national security threat.” The Daily Beast ran a report on November 14 titled, “Tulsi Gabbard’s Ties to ‘Cult’ Could Cost Her Intel Job,” which highlighted her lifelong association with SIF. The foundation is a Hawaii-based offshoot of the Krishna Consciousness movement, founded in the U.S. and popularized by Beatle George Harrison.
A Shifting Political Journey
Gabbard’s political career began in 2002 when she was elected to Hawaii’s state house at the age of 21, making her the youngest woman to hold such a position in the U.S. state legislature. In 2013, she made history as the first practicing Hindu elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. She garnered national attention in 2016 by endorsing Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton and later ran for president in 2020.
Her political evolution has been striking. Gabbard left the Democratic Party in 2022 to become an independent, later endorsing Donald Trump, aligning with the Republican Party, and actively campaigning for Trump this year.
Connections to the Science of Identity Foundation
Gabbard’s ties to SIF, founded in 1977 by Chris Butler (known as Jagad Guru Siddhaswarupananda Paramahamsa), have been reported extensively over the years, including in 2017, 2019, and again this year by Honolulu’s *Civil Beat*. Gabbard attended an SIF boarding school and met both of her husbands through the organization.
The foundation traces its roots to Butler’s early discipleship under AC Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, who founded the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) in 1966. ISKCON became widely recognized for its public chanting of “Hare Krishna” and fundraising campaigns but also faced allegations of cult-like practices, such as strict obedience and isolation from the outside world. Disagreements between Butler and Prabhupada led Butler to break away and establish SIF, introducing a more politicized form of Hinduism that included relaxed traditions, such as allowing devotees to forgo shaving their heads.
Butler’s influence extended into politics, with the establishment of the Independents for Godly Government, a political party that promoted conservative candidates in Hawaii. Gabbard’s parents were also prominent within SIF, founding groups such as Stop Promoting Homosexuality in 1991 and the Alliance for Traditional Marriage in 1995. The latter supported an anti-same-sex marriage amendment, which passed in Hawaii in 1998. Gabbard, as a teenager, appeared in a campaign ad for the amendment but later cited her military service as a catalyst for her changed views on LGBTQ+ rights.
International Ties and Allegations of Religious Bias
Questions have also been raised about Gabbard’s connections to Hindu nationalist groups in India that support Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Critics allege these groups promote persecution of Muslims and Christians. India’s ambassador to the U.S. attended Gabbard’s second wedding in 2015, and she traveled to India at Modi’s personal invitation. When questioned about these ties, Gabbard has dismissed the criticism as religious prejudice, accusing detractors of “Hinduphobia.”
Controversial Nominees in Trump’s Cabinet
Gabbard is not the only contentious nominee in Trump’s proposed administration. Conservative Christian Family Research Council President Tony Perkins called for “urgent prayer” on November 11, urging that Trump surround himself with “godly counsel” in his cabinet selections. Among Trump’s choices are Vivek Ramaswamy, another Hindu nominee, and three individuals accused of sexual abuse: Matt Gaetz, Pete Hegseth, and Robert Kennedy Jr.
Trump has signaled his intention to bypass Senate scrutiny for his appointments by using recess appointments, avoiding potentially uncomfortable confirmation hearings.
Gabbard’s nomination remains polarizing, with her political journey and ties to a controversial spiritual movement at the forefront of public debate.
AAPI’s Highly Successful 100 Days Under the Presidency of Dr. Satheesh Kathula
It’s been 100 days since Dr. Satheesh Kathula assumed charge as the President of AAPI in late July 2024. Dr. Kathula, who has risen from being an ordinary member over two decades ago to being the President today, has served AAPI in various capacities. He was the Regional Director, and a member of the Board of Trustees. He was elected overwhelmingly by AAPI members as the national Treasurer, Secretary, and Vice President of AAPI, and served as the President-Elect of AAPI during the year 2023-24.
Dr. Kathula’s presidency began with organizing Leadership Seminars for AAPI leaders at the Indian Consulate in New York and leading the India Independence Day Parades. “I proudly represented AAPI at the Independence Day celebrations in both Chicago and New York. These events were not only a celebration of our heritage but also an opportunity to showcase the vital role AAPI plays in the community,” says Dr. Kathula.
Recognizing the importance of Media and the role it plays in conveying AAPI’s core messages and showcasing the many initiatives to AAPI members spread across the US and to the larger public, Dr. Kathula was instrumental in organizing the largest press conference in AAPI’s history at the Consul General’s office in NYC. “This event served to outline our strategic goals and initiatives, garnering significant media attention and public interest. In addition, this platform allowed us to raise awareness and advocate for necessary reforms, emphasizing the importance of protecting our healthcare professionals,” said Dr. Kathula.
In addition, he participated in an interview on BBC and with the Press Trust of India, where he addressed critical issues surrounding physician safety in India and the contributions of Indian American physicians.
His efforts to engage the Diplomatic officials of India in the US led him to his productive meetings with the Hon. Consul General of New York, Binay Pradhan and Deputy Consul General Dr. Varun Jeph. “These meetings fostered a stronger relationship between AAPI and Indian diplomatic channels, paving the way for future collaborations.
A critical priority of Dr. Kathula has been to build bridges with AAPI’s local chapters. In his efforts to reach out to the local Chapters, he attended several alumni meetings for Guntur, Rangaraya, and Siddhartha medical colleges, as well as Osmania, Gandhi, Kakatiya, Telangana medical colleges, and BJMC. Additionally, he participated at the Indian Physicians of Florida chapter annual gala. The annual Fall Governing Body meeting in Huntsville, AL was highly successful where key decisions were made for the betterment of the organization. “These interactions have strengthened our network and fostered a sense of community,” Dr. Kathula said.
He was a guest of honor for Kakatiya Research Initiative for Transformative Innovations (KRITI), organized by NRI alumni of Kakatiya Medical College in Warangal. He participated as the guest of honor for Indian Medical Association of Telangana State. He had an opportunity to meet president elect of National IMA, Dr. Dilip Bhanushali and assured support and discussed about common goals and challenges and opportunities to collaborate.
The historic Global healthcare Summit in New Delhi, with very minimum days to prepare and organize turned out to be highly successful. “This year we gather under the important and timely theme of preventing cancer and heart attacks through lifestyle modifications and technology in a world where chronic diseases like cancer and cardiovascular illnesses continue to pose significant health threats, where corrective mission has never been more urgent,” said Dr. Kathula. GHS events received extensive coverage in media outlets across India and by leading publications in the US. This event was instrumental in highlighting AAPI’s commitment to public health and community engagement.
In order to materialize the themes and plans of AAPI, it’s vital to have local Government participation and collaboration. Towards this end., Dr. Kathula along with AAPI delegation represented met with Hon. Indian Minister of Health Mr. J.P. Nadda and Minister of Coal, Mr. Kishan Reddy, with their discussions focusing on collaborative initiatives that could benefit both the healthcare sector and the community at large in India.
In addition, Dr. Kathula engaged with the Hon. Chief Minister of Telangana, Mr. Revanth Reddy, and key advisors, including Mr. Vem Narendar Reddy and Chief SecretaryMr. Jayesh Ranjan. During these meetings, “We discussed AAPI’s initiatives aimed at preventing cancer and heart disease, emphasizing our commitment to public health.”
Education is a primary role of AAPI, Dr. Kathula led several continuing medical education webinars designed to provide valuable resources and knowledge to AAPI members. These sessions have been well-received and have facilitated ongoing professional development.
In collaboration with the American Heart Association, under his leadership, AAPI initiated CPR training programs to equip AAPI members and the community with essential lifesaving skills. This partnership underscores AAPI’s commitment to health education and awareness.
Dr. Kathula received Dr. Daniel Blumenthal Award on behalf of AAPI in Washington, DC. This recognition reflects our hard work and dedication to excellence in our field. The American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM) presented the fourth annual Dr. Daniel S. Blumenthal Award to AAPI in recognition of its efforts to promote health equity.
In collaboration with AAPI leadership., Dr. Kathula has been credited with successfully “conducting a fair election for the Vice President of AAPI, ensuring transparency and integrity in our electoral processes. This is crucial for maintaining trust within our organization,: said Dr. Kathula.
Financial Oversight and transparency have been a focus of Dr. Kathula’s Presidency. “I appointed committees to audit pending accounts, ensuring financial accountability and transparency. This step is vital for building a strong financial foundation for our future initiatives.” A fundraising event for AAPI will be held in Dayton, OH on November 17th in association with MVAPI.
Dr. Kathula has been credired to have been working diligently to resolve several ongoing lawsuits, focusing on protecting AAPI’s interests while striving for equitable solutions. This effort is essential for the stability and reputation of our organization.
A new initiative under Dr. Kathula is the launching of the “Million Miles to Honor Veterans” initiative, aimed at promoting awareness and support for our veterans. This campaign encourages participation in physical activities while honoring the sacrifices of those who have served.
Another major focus under his Presidency is the his efforts to initiate a bone marrow and stem cell donation project to facilitate and encourage donations within our community. This program is vital for increasing awareness and addressing the critical need for donors, potentially saving lives.
Moving forward, Dr. Kathula says, he remains “committed to making a lasting impact and believe in the immense potential of AAPI. Together, we can strengthen our organization and continue to serve our communities effectively. Let’s keep working collaboratively for our shared vision, as AAPI is truly greater than any individual. Thank you for your continued support and dedication.”
Serving 1 in every 7 patients in the US, AAPI members care for millions of patients every day, while several of them have risen to hold high-flying jobs, shaping the policies and programs, and inventions that shape the landscape of healthcare in the US and around the world.
Since its inception in 1982, AAPI has been at the forefront, representing a conglomeration of more than 125,000 practicing physicians in the United States, seeking to be the united voice for the physicians of Indian origin. For more details about AAPI, please visit: www.aapiusa,org
Trump’s Peacemaker Appeal Resonates in Kamala Harris’s Ancestral Chennai
On the eve of the U.S. presidential election, Bala Raja, an 84-year-old retired professional in Chennai, India, expressed unequivocal support for Donald Trump. Wearing a cap emblazoned with “NYC,” Raja confidently declared, “He’s the right man.”
Raja was not alone in his sentiment. Male voters globally, including in Besant Nagar, the Chennai suburb where U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris’s mother, Shyamala Gopalan, grew up, echoed their approval of Trump. Their rationale for supporting him centered on his potential as a peacemaker.
After a visit to the Varasiddhi Vinayaka Temple, overlooking the scenic seaside where Harris once walked with her grandfather, Raja elaborated on his views. “He will control everybody,” he said, asserting that Trump could effectively manage global powers like China and Russia. Reflecting on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, he stated, “[Trump] would have stopped the war.” Another supporter, R. Srikanth, agreed. Drawing comparisons to Trump’s first term, Srikanth remarked that Vladimir Putin refrained from invading Ukraine during that time. “He’ll talk to Putin,” he added, emphasizing the hope for global peace under Trump’s leadership. “The world wants some sort of peace so everybody can grow.”
However, neither Raja nor Srikanth provided specifics on how Trump might achieve such peace, whether in Ukraine or Gaza. This lack of clarity mirrored Trump’s campaign rhetoric, which relied heavily on the slogan “peace through strength.” The concept resonated with many Indians, including 29-year-old engineer Goutam Nimmagadda. Watching the sunset along the Chennai coast on November 5, Nimmagadda said, “He wants to stop wars and all of that,” referencing the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. He speculated that this perception might explain the belief in Trump’s suitability for fostering global stability.
In India, favorable views of Trump are not new. A Pew Research Center poll conducted in June revealed that 42% of Indians expressed confidence in him—one of the highest global ratings. Among Indian men, 51% voiced confidence in Trump, compared to 32% of women. Globally, only men in Ghana, Nigeria, and Bangladesh displayed greater confidence in Trump. Contributing to this admiration may be the abundance of Trump-branded real estate in India, second only to the U.S., as reported by Indian media.
Sumitra Badrinathan, a political scientist at American University, attributes the emerging perception of Trump as a peacemaker to a broader narrative. “There’s a lot of people across the world who do believe this narrative that Trump is going to end the wars. It’s not unique to India,” she observed. This belief, fueled by campaign rhetoric and social media messaging, has gained traction internationally. Filtered through platforms like WhatsApp, it shaped opinions even in distant places like Chennai.
Milan Vaishnav, who directs the South Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, links these perceptions to the U.S.-India dynamic during Trump’s first term. The relationship between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump flourished during that period, marked by high-profile events like the “Howdy Modi” rally in Houston and the “Namaste Trump” gathering in India. Vaishnav noted, “The U.S. relationship with India really wasn’t something that was caught up in turmoil. In fact, you could argue that it went from strength to strength.”
This close association between the two leaders likely shaped Indian perceptions of Trump. Analysts suggest that a second Trump administration might see India capitalizing on robust trade ties with the U.S. while avoiding punitive tariffs. Additionally, India could face reduced scrutiny over its human rights record and its continued purchase of Russian oil amid Western embargoes.
Vaishnav highlighted the alignment between Modi and Trump as a potential factor in Trump’s favorable reception among Indian men. “They see similarities between Modi and Trump,” he said, adding that Modi’s efforts to position himself as a peacemaker may resonate with Trump’s narrative. Vaishnav referenced Modi’s meetings with both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy earlier this year, where Modi sought to mediate and foster dialogue. “It’s this idea that we live in this chaotic world,” Vaishnav explained. “There’s a lot of instability, there’s a lot of global volatility. And we need these sort of larger than life strongman figures to essentially stabilize that system.”
Badrinathan, however, offered an alternative explanation for Trump’s peacemaker image: a lack of competing narratives. “I think we have to consider the simple explanation,” she said. “They did not hear any other message. This is the only one they heard.”
As Trump prepares for another term in the White House, his promise of “peace through strength” has clearly struck a chord with supporters in India, reflecting broader global sentiments. For some, his leadership embodies a vision of stability and strength amidst a volatile world, even if the specifics of his approach remain undefined.
Emmy-nominated filmmaker Tirlok Malik’s On Golden Years Receives Resounding Applause at Teaneck International Film Festival
Emmy-nominated filmmaker Tirlok Malik’s heartfelt film On Golden Years made a memorable impact at the Teaneck International Film Festival’s 19th annual celebration. Held on November 10, 2024, the screening drew a warm response from the audience, ending with resounding applause and a powerful message of love and resilience.
The film resonated deeply with viewers, who praised both its storytelling and its reflection of the immigrant experience. Sanjay Modi called it a “truly good story and well portrayed on the big screen,” adding he planned to see it again with his wife. Harry Shah remarked that it carried a “great message of love” and noted how it reflects “a reality which we immigrants have been living.” Pam and Lall Kawatra also expressed their appreciation, saying, “We loved the film; congratulations to Tirlok Malik!”
David Nachman, Esq., Managing Attorney at Nachman, Phulwani, Zimovcak (NPZ) Law Group, P.C. shared: “Thank you for giving us the opportunity to sponsor such an excellent film with such an important message at a critical time. The NPZ Law Group is pleased to support TIFF’s missions and messages. Congratulations to Tirlok Malik for providing attendees with exposure to a truly timeless film.”
Jeremy Lentz, Executive Director of the Teaneck International Film Festival, added, “It was an honor to present On Golden Years at the 19th Teaneck International Film Festival. The message of this film reminds us to love each day you are given and live each day you’ve got — leading with love and compassion. I hope this film will uplift and inspire others to be kind to each other and take care of one another.”
The screening concluded with a lively Q&A, where Malik expressed his gratitude, made everyone laugh in his trademark style, and left everyone with a final, uplifting message to love oneself and live every moment of life to the fullest. This sentiment, capturing the spirit of the film, left a lasting impression on attendees and reinforced the power of cinema to bring people together and inspire a love for life.
Murtaza Ali Khan is an award-winning film critic who has served on the jury of the 69th and the 70th National Awards. He has been covering cinema, arts, and culture for the last decade and a half. He can be reached at murtaza.jmi@gmail.com.
India Warns Against Mere “Tinkering” with UN Security Council Reform
India has raised alarms about the possibility of “smokescreen” efforts in reforming the UN Security Council (UNSC), warning that any attempt to merely tweak the existing framework could indefinitely delay critical reforms. This includes addressing the underrepresentation of regions such as Asia, Africa, and Latin America, and expanding permanent membership. These concerns were voiced by India’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ambassador P. Harish, during the annual plenary of the UN General Assembly on the ‘Question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council’ on Monday.
Harish highlighted the lack of progress on UNSC reform, despite decades of international consensus on the need for change. He emphasized that, “it is disheartening that we have had no results to show in this regard since 1965, when the Council was last expanded in the non-permanent category alone.” That year, the UNSC’s membership was increased from six to ten elected members. India has been calling for further reforms ever since, focusing particularly on the expansion of permanent members.
The process of Intergovernmental Negotiations (IGN) has been one of the main vehicles for these discussions. However, Harish expressed disappointment with the lack of substantial progress in the 16 years since the IGN began. “The IGN remains largely confined to exchanging statements, speaking at, rather than with each other. No negotiating text. No time frame. And no defined end goal,” he said. This lack of direction, according to India, undermines efforts to achieve tangible outcomes, such as developing a new model for UNSC reform that would pave the way for text-based negotiations.
India has called for meaningful action in the IGN, but Harish urged caution regarding two key aspects of the reform process. The first concern is that the search for a minimum threshold of input from member states should not result in an indefinite delay in the development of a new model. “The development of a consolidated model based on ‘convergences’ should not lead to a race to the bottom to trace the lowest common denominator,” he explained. Harish warned that such a process could be exploited as a “smokescreen” to make only superficial changes to the UNSC framework, falsely presenting them as substantial reforms.
This, according to Harish, could delay necessary reforms like the expansion of permanent membership and addressing the under-representation of regions such as Asia, Africa, and Latin America. These issues could be pushed “to a very distant future,” he cautioned.
India has also expressed concerns about an argument pushed by certain countries that support maintaining the “status quo” in the UNSC. These nations have insisted that “even before beginning text-based negotiations, we must all agree on everything!” Harish criticized this stance, calling it an extreme case of “putting the ‘cart before the horse.'” He reiterated that this approach would prevent real progress toward reforms.
As a representative of the Global South, India believes that the legitimacy and effectiveness of the UN—and the Security Council in particular—are dependent on fair representation. Harish noted that “representation stands as the unassailable prerequisite for both ‘legitimacy’ and ‘effectiveness’ of not just the Council, but the UN as a whole.” He drew attention to the adaptability of younger multilateral frameworks, citing the example of the G20. Under India’s presidency in 2023, the African Union was welcomed as a full member. Harish used this as proof that “with political will, change is indeed possible.”
India remains hopeful that the UN member states will engage constructively to achieve concrete progress on Security Council reforms. Harish emphasized that such reforms must “respect the sentiments of the majority through the time-tested manner of negotiations.” He concluded that updating the UN is essential for preserving its legitimacy and credibility. “That should indeed be our resolution for the UN’s 80th anniversary,” he said.
India has long advocated for reform of the Security Council, especially the expansion of both permanent and non-permanent membership categories. The current 15-nation structure, founded in 1945, is viewed by India as inadequate for the demands of the 21st century, and it does not reflect contemporary geopolitical realities. India has repeatedly asserted that it deserves a permanent seat at the table, a position it last held as a non-permanent member from 2021 to 2022.
The ongoing challenges within the Security Council are also evident in its inability to address current global peace and security issues. Council members remain deeply divided over major conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas conflict. As UN Secretary-General António Guterres pointed out, the United Nations began with 51 member states nearly 80 years ago and has since grown to 193, reflecting the changing dynamics of global governance.
In his address to the UN’s Summit of the Future in September, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi emphasized the need for reforms in global institutions to ensure global peace and development. “Reform is the key to relevance,” he stated, underscoring that the world must adapt to new realities in order to maintain peace and progress.
In a historic moment at the summit, world leaders adopted the Pact of the Future by consensus. The Pact calls for “reform of the Security Council, recognizing the urgent need to make it more representative, inclusive, transparent, efficient, effective, democratic and accountable.” UN officials have hailed the language used in the Pact regarding Security Council reforms as “groundbreaking.”
The Pact outlines a commitment to redressing the historical injustice faced by Africa, which has long been underrepresented in the UNSC. It also prioritizes the representation of other underrepresented regions, such as Asia-Pacific, and Latin America and the Caribbean. The reform agenda includes expanding the Council to make it more representative of the current UN membership and reflective of contemporary global realities.
The Pact also calls for intensified efforts to reach an agreement on the categories of membership, taking into account the ongoing discussions in the Intergovernmental Negotiations process. This reflects a growing consensus among the international community that the time for meaningful reform of the UNSC has arrived. However, the path forward remains uncertain, with competing interests and political considerations continuing to shape the debate.
Filmmaker Payal Kapadia Brings Mumbai to Life in “All We Imagine as Light
Have you ever watched a film that transports you so deeply that you wish to live in its world? For Indian filmmaker Payal Kapadia, Wong Kar-wai’s Chungking Express had such an impact. Captivated by its unique aura of romantic longing as a teenager, Kapadia wanted to visit Hong Kong and lose herself in its vibrant, neon-lit streets.
“I was really into that movie,” Kapadia recalls. Years later, when she finally got to Hong Kong, she made a point to visit Hong Kong Mansions, the sprawling complex featured prominently in Wong’s film. However, the reality didn’t quite match the dreamy allure the film had conjured.
“Because how could it not?” she says, laughing. “It’s all Wong Kar-wai. But it did make me think about subjectivity and all the feelings that can be infused into a movie’s setting to make it so much more delightful.”
Drawing inspiration from her teenage experience and what she learned at India’s Film & Television Institute, Kapadia poured her insights into her first feature film, All We Imagine as Light, releasing at the Laemmle Royal. The movie presents Mumbai with the same vibrancy Wong brought to Hong Kong, depicting both the chaos of the city by day and the haunting stillness of rain-soaked streets at night. The story revolves around three women: Prabha (Kani Kusruti), a serious-minded nurse; Anu (Divya Prabha), her young roommate; and Parvaty (Chhaya Kadam), an activist and widow recently displaced by property developers.
Men appear in the narrative, though their presence is complicated. Prabha’s husband, arranged through marriage, lives in Germany, and it’s unclear when or if he’ll return; meanwhile, Anu has a boyfriend, Shiaz (Hridhu Haroon), but their relationship must remain hidden due to religious differences—Anu is Hindu, and Shiaz is Muslim.
With an intimate portrayal of their lives, All We Imagine as Light blends personal and political elements. The film became the first Indian feature in nearly 30 years to compete at Cannes, where it won the Grand Prix. Praised as a beautiful, empathetic depiction of a city and its people, the film’s portrayal of Mumbai could leave viewers eager to visit.
On a warm Sunday in October, Kapadia has just arrived in Los Angeles from San Francisco and is seated at a Beverly Hills hotel restaurant, keeping out of the sun. A waiter offers them bottomless mimosas.
“That sounds like a very L.A. thing,” Kapadia says, smiling. She passes on the mimosas, saving her energy for events for her film later in the day. However, she accepts caviar on a small pancake, her first time trying it. “One doesn’t say no to caviar,” she jokes. Nibbling it, she comments, “It’s salty. But it’s really not that nice.” The pancake, however, earns her approval.
Kapadia, 38, finds herself intrigued by America. “I’m amazed at this country,” she says. “It’s baffling, but interesting. Just the whole of it and the general happiness. But I’ve been going to very liberal cities in America, so I get the sense that this is a great country where people are really expressing themselves. ‘Wow, America is so accepting.’ But it’s the same in India. You can have many different Indias, just as, I suppose, you can have many different Americas.”
Growing up, Kapadia was surrounded by creative influences—her mother, Nalini Malani, is a well-known video artist. Watching her mother edit films sparked Kapadia’s interest in film, and in high school, she joined a film club that showed works by directors like Werner Herzog, Andrei Tarkovsky, and Satyajit Ray. By college, Kapadia was a regular at documentary and world cinema festivals in Mumbai.
“My family was always supportive,” she says, “which is why, as a woman, I could be a filmmaker. There would be so many people in my country who would think, ‘Why is the daughter pursuing higher education in the first place?’ Or they would only have enough money to pay for the son to go to college. I am very privileged. To make films is very difficult.”
The Film & Television Institute of India is highly selective, admitting only 10 students per discipline each year. Kapadia got in on her second attempt, and after graduating in 2018, she began writing All We Imagine as Light. During this time, she also created A Night of Knowing Nothing, a documentary about student protests against the Hindu nationalist policies of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Kapadia views All We Imagine as Light as a political film, though it is not overtly so. In one scene, a character says they’ve lived in Mumbai for 23 years but still feel like an outsider.
“Mumbai is a perilous city—even its geography is in a state of flux,” Kapadia says. “Historically, it was just seven islands that was bridged by the British East India Company to make it a port because they lost their port in Surat. So the whole premise of the city comes from a super-capitalistic, colonialist past. And the city remains in a state of flux. Developers are grabbing areas where people have lived for years. Women move there to feel more liberated, but there’s an impermanence as well.”
The instability Kapadia sees in Mumbai reflects in Anu’s relationship with Shiaz, whose different religious backgrounds cast a shadow over their future together. A tender love scene between the two conveys both “romance and this girl’s desires—and also freedom,” Kapadia notes.
After wrapping filming in November, Kapadia headed to Paris, where the film’s post-production took place with a French team. She was in the thick of editing when Cannes selected the movie. In the lead-up to the festival, she worked up to 18-hour days.
“It was intense,” says Ranabir Das, the cinematographer. “After a point, we lost perspective because of the long days, so we were not 100% sure if the film was finished or if the edit was right. It became difficult because we were working on instinct itself.”
Kapadia has a more straightforward take: “When we turned it in, I was like, ‘I don’t know what it is. I don’t know what I’ve done.’” She laughs at the memory.
The film’s premiere at Cannes was a nerve-wracking moment for Kapadia, who watched with one eye shut. When it ended, the audience responded with a standing ovation. Kapadia’s joy was captured on camera, her smile widening in relief. Celebrating with her cast, crew, and mother afterward, they shared in her achievement.
Her mother’s response? “She told me she needed to watch it again,” Kapadia says. “Then she went again the next day. She liked it a lot. I discussed this film, all the layers and contexts, with her over many, many years. She was happy that, regardless of all the ups and downs, that it finally came together.”
Though All We Imagine as Light was shortlisted by France for an Oscar entry, the committee ultimately selected Jacques Audiard’s Emilia Pérez, while India chose Laapataa Ladies. However, its Oscar prospects are not over. Last year, Anatomy of a Fall was nominated in multiple categories despite being passed over by France.
As we talked, Kapadia was more focused on her film’s premiere at the MAMI Mumbai Film Festival and her next project, another film set in Mumbai. A giant butterfly fluttered by as she shared her thoughts on the creative journey.
“Yeah, it’s hard to ignore it,” she says, laughing. “Even the butterflies are bigger here.”
As Kapadia wraps up, she reflects on her experience: “This is all lovely,” she says. But she’s ready to go back to work. “It’s what I live for. Those years making this movie were stressful, but it also made me want to work more. It’s what I’m happiest doing.”
Global Climate Talks Open in Baku Amid Uncertain U.S. Stance on Environmental Goals
The COP29 summit has officially commenced in Baku, Azerbaijan, a nation known for its significant oil and gas production, positioned strategically along the Caspian Sea. This annual climate summit, attended by global leaders, scientists, environmental activists, and corporate representatives, is a platform to discuss actionable strategies to mitigate global warming and address the urgent climate-related threats facing communities worldwide. However, the recent re-election of Donald Trump as U.S. President has raised concerns about the future of America’s participation in international climate initiatives, especially given the country’s status as a major historical contributor to greenhouse gas emissions.
Last year’s conference concluded with an important agreement to move countries away from fossil fuel reliance. However, Trump has consistently advocated for increased fossil-fuel production in the U.S., a stance that could hinder international climate efforts. In fact, even before Trump’s return, the United Nations had already signaled that global efforts to combat climate pollution were severely lagging. 2023 saw greenhouse gas emissions reach record highs, and scientists from the EU now suggest with near certainty that 2024 will surpass all previous years as the hottest on record.
At the heart of this year’s discussions will be financing climate change efforts. The Baku summit aims to address the immense financial demands required to transform economies that remain deeply entrenched in fossil fuels and to help countries cope with escalating extreme weather risks. These financial needs are most urgent in developing countries, which contribute minimally to global emissions yet face the heaviest burdens of climate change. Nonetheless, funding remains far short of the necessary levels, and climate experts warn that the window for averting the most severe consequences of global warming is rapidly closing.
Rich Lesser, global chair of Boston Consulting Group, noted the urgency of the situation, saying, “I remain very optimistic on the technology side. The challenge is that the timeline to do this is not set by us.”
Objectives and Purpose of the COP29 Summit
This summit traces its roots to the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, an international treaty signed by nearly 200 countries to prevent human-caused greenhouse gas pollution from disrupting the Earth’s climate. The annual climate meetings, known as the Conference of the Parties (COP), bring countries together to evaluate progress. COP29 will follow the tradition of assessing global action plans toward limiting global warming to under 2 degrees Celsius, with an ideal cap of 1.5 degrees, compared to pre-industrial levels to mitigate escalating extreme weather impacts. Yet, despite the target, the global community remains far from achieving these goals.
The landmark Paris Agreement, signed in 2015, mandated countries to set specific emissions reduction targets and periodically update them. These targets are aimed at containing global temperature increases within manageable limits. Nonetheless, current projections show the world is not close to meeting the 1.5-degree goal, and achieving it remains increasingly unlikely without significant shifts in climate policies.
Impact of the U.S. Presidential Election
Trump’s election victory could influence the summit’s trajectory. Known for his dismissal of climate change as a “hoax,” Trump previously withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Agreement and has implied he may repeat this action in his upcoming term.
“President-elect Trump has made very clear that he won’t wait six months to pull out of the Paris agreement like he did in his last term,” explained Alden Meyer, senior associate at climate think tank E3G. “He will pull out on day one.”
If the U.S. were to withdraw, the process requires a year to finalize. However, the immediate threat of departure is already impacting the diplomatic atmosphere. Meyer added that due to Trump’s victory, countries at the Baku summit may look to the European Union and China for leadership rather than the U.S.
Early next year, countries are expected to submit more ambitious emission reduction commitments. Still, to move forward, they must establish a new framework to assist developing countries in reducing fossil fuel dependence and managing climate change impacts. This agenda item will be a primary focus at COP29.
Financial Assistance Promised to Developing Nations
Wealthy nations have historically built their prosperity by exploiting fossil fuels, thereby contributing significantly to global warming. Developing countries, by contrast, are responsible for a smaller share of emissions but endure disproportionate climate impacts due to weaker economies and geographic vulnerabilities.
To address this disparity, wealthier nations pledged in 2009 to allocate $100 billion annually to developing nations by 2020. This goal, reaffirmed in 2015 and extended to 2025, is intended to support developing nations in combating climate change. However, despite reaching a record $115.9 billion in 2022, these funds only partially meet the critical needs of these nations.
Vijaya Ramachandran, director for energy and development at The Breakthrough Institute, emphasized the necessity of sustained funding. “I think for me, success is when the money is actually delivered,” she said. “What we really want to see is an increase in resources to poor countries that will actually enable them to tackle climate change. Instead, what we are seeing are these pronouncements.”
Additionally, the summit will discuss the newly established “loss and damage” fund, designed to support vulnerable countries already suffering from climate-related losses. While some countries have committed to the fund, no payments have yet been distributed due to ongoing discussions on its administration.
Countries’ Commitments to Emission Reduction
Countries are scheduled to submit their next round of emissions reduction pledges in February 2025. Some nations may unveil their commitments during the Baku summit.
The 2022 climate talks reached a consensus on the need to phase out fossil fuels such as oil, gas, and coal. Yet, S&P Global Commodity Insights reports that investments in fossil fuel exploration and production have increased this year. Trump’s climate agenda, which includes promoting fossil fuels and reducing funding for renewable energy projects, contrasts sharply with global climate goals. Trump has pledged to “terminate” Biden’s climate initiatives, including investments in solar and wind energy and large-scale batteries.
Assessment of Global Climate Goals
During COP28 in Dubai last year, countries committed to tripling renewable energy capacity by 2030 and improving annual energy efficiency rates by 4%. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), this commitment is crucial to avoid the adverse effects of ongoing fossil fuel usage. Although countries aim to achieve 11,000 gigawatts of renewable energy capacity by 2030, a recent IRENA report suggests that they are on track to reach only half that target by the deadline.
IRENA director-general Francesco La Camera cautioned that while meeting this goal remains possible, it becomes increasingly challenging each year. “We made a shared commitment at COP28. Now it is time for us to deliver,” he said.
Countries are expected to submit detailed plans outlining how they intend to meet these climate goals in 2025. However, IRENA indicates limited progress in annual energy efficiency improvements, falling short of the 4% target.
For COP29, Azerbaijan has introduced an ambitious objective to enhance global energy storage capacity sixfold. Energy storage, primarily through batteries, is essential for maintaining renewable energy supplies during periods without sunlight or wind.
Role of Indigenous Communities
Indigenous groups have limited representation at COP meetings, but they offer valuable insights to countries willing to listen. These groups often advocate for policies that respect Indigenous rights and address the specific climate challenges they face.
Eriel Deranger, executive director of Indigenous Climate Action, highlighted Indigenous voices’ marginalization at COP29, stating, “It’s been really difficult, to be honest.”
Graeme Reed, representing North American Indigenous communities, emphasized the need for global solidarity among Indigenous groups. He explained, “The COP is predicated on the erasure of Indigenous nationhood. It’s built around the upholding of state nationhood, and as a result, we won’t see significant change until the nationhood of Indigenous peoples is acknowledged and incorporated.”
As COP29 progresses, these diverse perspectives will help shape the policies and commitments countries make toward tackling the global climate crisis. The decisions reached in Baku are likely to have lasting effects on climate actions worldwide, highlighting the urgent need for countries to not only commit to ambitious climate goals but also follow through on these commitments.
Canadian Police Arrest Sikhs for Justice Coordinator Inderjeet Gosal Over Brampton Temple Attack on Hindu Devotees
The Canadian police recently apprehended Inderjeet Gosal, a prominent operative of Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), a group banned in India. Gosal’s arrest is linked to last week’s pro-Khalistani assault on Hindu worshippers at a temple in Brampton, Ontario, authorities confirmed on Sunday.
Gosal holds the position of SFJ’s coordinator for Canada and was closely associated with Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a prominent Khalistani terrorist who was killed earlier. Gosal was also the organizer of a recent Khalistan referendum, which called for an independent Sikh state in India’s Punjab region, as reported by the Toronto Star.
Authorities have charged the 35-year-old with assault using a weapon in relation to the violent protest staged outside the Hindu Sabha Mandir. In a public statement, Peel Region Police stated, “On November 8, 2024, he [Gosal] was arrested and charged with Assault with a Weapon. He was released on conditions and is to appear at the Ontario Court of Justice in Brampton at a later date.”
This arrest follows the detention of three others connected to the temple violence and subsequent protests. The incident in question occurred on November 4, during a pro-Khalistani demonstration held near the temple to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the anti-Sikh riots in India. As tensions escalated, members of the demonstration launched an assault on Hindu devotees attending the temple, sparking swift international outrage. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi condemned the attack, referring to it as a “deliberate attack” and a “cowardly attempt to intimidate our diplomats.” The violence also drew international criticism, highlighting tensions surrounding Canada’s handling of such incidents.
The Peel Region Police have acknowledged the complexity of the investigation. According to their statement, investigations of this nature require time, and individuals are detained as they are identified without following any specific sequence. “A Strategic Investigative Team dedicated to investigating incidents of criminality during the November 3 and 4 incidents has since been formed,” said the police. They added, “Investigators continue to analyse hundreds of videos of the incidents and are working to identify additional suspects involved in criminality and anticipate further arrests.”
The violence at the Brampton temple ignited significant public demonstrations, attracting both Hindu and Sikh communities. The protests initially concentrated outside the Brampton temple but soon spread to two additional sites in Mississauga, with hundreds of people from both communities gathering to voice their sentiments.
In a related development, a Canadian police officer named Harinder Sohi was suspended for participating in the pro-Khalistan demonstration. Video footage captured Sohi holding a Khalistan flag while protesters around him chanted anti-India slogans.
Banarasi Weave Gets a Modern Twist in Contemporary Fashion
The Banarasi weave, a timeless fashion staple during the festive and wedding seasons in India, has long been associated with grandeur. Whether it’s a deep red silk Banarasi saree adorned with shimmering golden zari or a statement dupatta elevating a simple kurta set, a Banarasi creation is synonymous with festive glamour. The appeal of Banarasi lies in its regal and luxurious aura, making it a favorite choice for traditional wear.
In recent years, however, Banarasi has extended its influence into menswear as well. This traditional textile, known for its intricate handwoven patterns, now graces a variety of men’s garments such as kurtas, safas, shawls, bandhgalas, and sherwanis. While it is widely thought that Banarasi was solely a part of women’s wardrobes, historical evidence suggests otherwise. During the Mughal era, when the Banarasi weave came into prominence, emperors themselves wore garments made from this exquisite textile.
Banarasi Weave Adapts to Modern Fashion
Today, Banarasi continues to evolve, undergoing a bold transformation as designers experiment with modern interpretations of the weave. Western influences are now evident, with Banarasi textiles being used to create modish silhouettes, such as corsets, tops, pantsuits, and even short dresses. This new direction has expanded the weave’s reach, presenting it as a global fashion statement.
“Banarasi has long been celebrated for sarees, dupattas, and kurta sets, but today’s shift towards modern silhouettes is making it a global statement,” says Khushi Shah, creative director of Shanti Banaras, a label that is known for its authentic Banarasi handloom creations. Shah’s upcoming collection will blend traditional techniques with contemporary designs to cater to a broader, international clientele.
Designer Aditi Gupta, whose creations are featured at Carma Ambawatta, believes the shift toward modern designs is less about Westernisation and more about innovation. She credits the younger generation for embracing and reinterpreting Banarasi weaves in new, experimental ways.
“Today’s shoppers, especially the younger generation, are looking for pieces that blend heritage with functionality. They want garments that make a statement but also reflect their individuality and contemporary style. As a result, we’re seeing more demand for unique interpretations of Banarasi in experimental silhouettes, whether for festive wear or everyday luxury,” Gupta tells India Today.
Banarasi in the Spotlight at Fashion Week
While these modern versions of Banarasi garments retain the essence of their traditional craftsmanship, their silhouettes have undergone significant reimaginings. This modernization was particularly evident at Lakme Fashion Week 2024, where a variety of designers showcased fresh takes on the classic textile.
For example, designer Monisha Jaising featured Banarasi high-slit and asymmetrical skirts, paired with dazzling blouses, in her collection. Riddhima Kapoor Sahni, who was the showstopper for Jaising, walked the ramp in a strapless Banarasi gown, and Jaising herself sported a sleeveless Banarasi crop top for the final bow, reinforcing the trend’s chic, modern appeal.
Delhi-based designer Amit Aggarwal is also contributing to the evolution of Banarasi fashion. His collection, “The Banarasi Edit,” focuses on upcycling traditional Banarasi textiles and experimenting with modern interpretations of classic draping styles.
The trend has also received a nod from celebrities like Priyanka Chopra, Kriti Sanon, and Saba Azad, who were seen sporting various versions of Banarasi gowns at the Nita Mukesh Ambani Cultural Centre inauguration in Mumbai last year.
More Designers Embrace the Trend
The growing popularity of Banarasi’s modern makeover shows no signs of slowing down. More designers are incorporating this iconic textile into creations beyond the traditional saree or lehenga. Gaurika Rai, the CEO of the textile label Warp n Weft, has launched a collection that embraces modern women of traditional India with Banarasi mini dresses, maxi dresses, and corsets. This collection, in collaboration with House of Asra, is a celebration of fresh, contemporary silhouettes made from the traditional weave.
“Naturally, people are always eager for something new, and it’s time to introduce a fresh fashion statement that redefines traditional spaces—one that upholds the authenticity of exquisite Banarasi textiles while embracing a modern allure. Launching a Western-inspired collection caters to those seeking more than the classic saree, suit, lehenga, gharara, or floor-length skirt for special occasions,” says Rai.
In addition to dresses and corsets, the Banarasi textile is also making its way into more casual, everyday wear, including jumpsuits, trousers, and pantsuits. These designs bring the allure of Banarasi into the realm of professional attire, with simple pairings such as crisp white shirts and Banarasi brocade pants, making it easy to incorporate the traditional textile into a modern wardrobe.
“These new silhouettes enhance the versatility of Banarasi textiles and open doors for international markets. By doing so, the Banaras weaving cluster also gains new opportunities to grow and thrive. When approached with respect for the craftsmanship and original weaving techniques, these designs can bridge generations, celebrating heritage while evolving to meet modern tastes,” adds Nishant Malhotra, CEO and founder of WeaverStory.
Banarasi’s Enduring Allure
Although the traditional Banarasi saree and lehenga continue to hold an untouchable place in the world of Indian fashion, this modern twist on the classic textile brings a fresh and exciting option for those seeking contemporary elegance. As designers experiment with Banarasi in new forms, they are opening the door for the textile to evolve into a versatile fabric that can be worn for both special occasions and everyday luxury.
For those who are looking to update their wardrobes with a touch of tradition that feels fresh and new, the Banarasi modern twist is an option worth considering. This year, as the Banarasi wave continues to move beyond sarees and lehengas, more global fashion enthusiasts are embracing this evolution, keeping the craftsmanship and heritage of Banaras alive while making it relevant to contemporary style.
The timeless beauty of Banarasi weaves continues to captivate new generations, and as the fashion world continues to innovate, this iconic textile shows no signs of losing its place in the spotlight.
During Meeting With Sri J.P Nadda, Minister of Health & Family Welfare, AAPI Delegation Advocates For EMT, Medical Exam Reforms, Prevention of Cardiac Issues and Cancer, and Lifestyle Changes
As part of the 18th annual Global Healthcare Summit 2024, leaders of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) in their efforts to advocate for AAPI’s mission to help India create programs that are efficient, cost effective and affordable, and helping save lives through prevention and education, met with Honorable Health Minister of India, Shri Jagat Prakash Nadda in his office in New Delhi on October 19th 2024.
AAPI delegation was led by Sateesh Kathula, MD, President of AAPI, Sunil Kaza, MD, Chairmen Board of Trustees, AAPI, Lokesh Edara, MD, Chairmen of AAPI Global Medical Education, Amit Chakrabarty, MD, President-Elect of AAPI, and, Vasu Singh, MD, Regional Director, AAPI,
In his presentation before the Minister and his staff, Dr. Kathula pointed out that one in 28 Indian women may encounter breast cancer during their lifetime, compared to one in eight (8) women in the US.Every year in India, 127,000 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer, and 80,000 of them do not survive. Breast lumps, skin or nipple changes, unusual pain, and swelling are symptoms of breast cancer. Monthly self-breast exams, annual examinations by a doctor, and mammography as advised by a doctor can save lives.Women aged 30 years and above should get a Pap smear or VIA test every three years, or an HPV DNA test every five years. These simple tests help in the early detection of cervical cancer and can save lives.
Dr. Kathula urged the Government of India to create “an awareness program endorsed by the Ministry of Health and Family for an 11-second to 20 second video message to be shown before movies, similar to the anti-tobacco messages currently displayed, focusing on breast cancer and cervical cancer awareness.” He said, Breast and cervical cancer can be treated successfully when caught early.
Dr. Edara highlighted the challenges to implementation of the NEXT examination. “NMC has a majority theory examinations, limiting Multiple Choices questions to 20% only. This limits the ability of medicalstudents to complete effectively in global level tests due to lack of practice in taking Multiple Choices questions. The United States and most other countries have NEXT type 100% Multiple Choices questions from the first year onwards most of internals and all final examinations.
Dr. Edara suggested that NMC increases multiple choice questions from 20 % this year to 40%, next year 60%, following year 80%, finally to 100% multiple choice questions. He suggested that the Pass rate of NEXT should be same as average MBBS final examination approximately to 85 % to 90%.
The AAPI delegation stressed the need to introduce Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) Program across India, which will help in saving thousands of lives every day in India.
AAPI also recommended that the EMT programs are offered at medical schools that have Emergency Medicine Departments
Another recommendation by AAPI was to make Emergency Medicine Program mandated at all medical schools, which will help save lives, especially in rural India, where majority of India’s 1.4 people live.
Dr. Kaza stressed the importance of creating awareness on the need for lifestyle modifications that will help save lives by preventing diseases. “There is every need to reassess the current strategy in addressing cardiac issues and how best we can prevent cardiac diseases, especially by healthy diet, physical activities, cessation of smoking and alcohol, good sleep, and stress management. This can help reduce cardiac issues by 80%.”
Dr. Chakrabarty said, “After having listened to the recommendations and suggestions based on scientific studies, presented by AAPI, Honorable Health Minister of India, Shri Jagat Prakash Nadda expressed his openness to AAPI’s concerns and suggestions. He agreed to some of the suggestions, while he asked his staff to take note of AAPI’s suggestions and take appropriate actions as needed.
Dr. Nadda acknowledged that the world is staring at two most critical health challenges, cancer and cardiac diseases. Dr. Nadda said. “With aging population, changes in lifestyle and increasing urbanization, the incidence of cancer and cardiovascular diseases, particularly heart attacks, are on the rise. I’m happy to share that through the national program for prevention and control of cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and stroke program, we are providing a framework for individuals across the country who access health education screenings and support services aimed at prevention and early detection. It is well known that lifestyle modification is the key pillar in the prevention of ailments like cancer and cardiac diseases. Foundation of prevention of these diseases lies in adopting healthier lifestyles, like regular exercise, a balanced diet, and shunning tobacco and alcohol, Dr. Nadda told the AAPI delegation.”
“We all know that AAPI has been playing a key role in the exchange of experience and knowledge in the field of medicine between India and the US today,” Dr. Nadda said. “Together, we can harness the power of innovation and lifestyle modification to safety, frequently, reduce the burden of cancer and heart diseases, not only in India but across the globe. I thank AAPI for organizing the Global Healthcare Summit in India. Wishing the summit a grand success.”
The meeting with the Minister and other officials were part of the recently concluded Global Healthcare Summit 20245 organized in New Delhi from October 19-20th, 2024.
For more information about AAPI, please visit: www.aapiusa.org
Nara Lokesh, Minister in the Government of Andhra Pradesh Lays out His Vision for a New Resurgent India During his Address at ITServe’s Synergy 2024 in Las Vegas
A rising star in Indian Politics, Honorable Nara Lokesh, Minister of Information Technology, Electronics and Communications , and the Human Resources Development Departments in the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the General Secretary of the Telugu Desam Party, was the Chief Guest at Synergy 2024, the flagship annual conference organized by ITServe Alliance, the largest association of IT Services organizations.
Delivering the keynote address on October 29, 2024 at Synergy by ITServe, the voice of all prestigious IT companies functioning with similar interests across the United States, Honorable Nara Lokesh, Minister of Information Technology, Electronics and Communications and the Human Resources Development departments in the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the General Secretary of the Telugu Desam Party lauded ITServe as it has evolved as a resourceful and respected platform to collaborate and initiate measures in the direction of protecting common interests and ensuring collective success.
A true visionary with forward-thinking, Nara Lokesh, a rising star in Indian politics told the over 2,500 CEOs of small and medium-sized companies in the United States, who had come to be part of the historic Synergy 2024 that he believes the data revolution is here, and Andhra Pradesh is well-poised in terms of harnessing that revolution.
Earlier in his welcome address, Jagadeesh Mosali, President of ITServe Alliance said, “ITServe Alliance originated in response to the unfair practices of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services imposed on small and medium businesses, which are the economic engines of the country. We were the first in the nation to come up with an idea of an organization representing Information Technology professional Services of like-mind- ed business entrepreneurs. Through our PAC, ITServe has come a long way, especially visa-vis espousing our visibility and cause in the US Congress, introducing our very own HIRE ACT, talking to important key MOCs and Senators regarding our Bill, taking them into confidence and discussing a path to consolidate it with the EAGLE ACT.”
During his address to the ITServe delegates, Lokesh said, globally, close to $300 billion is being invested in data centers, and his government’s agenda is that we should bring over 100 billion of that to India, and bring the majority of that to the state of Andhra Pradesh. Vishakhapatnam, he said, stands out with AI education, and particularly with focus on an AI University. “They were really excited about figuring out the interactions of AI in governance, AI in politics, AI in healthcare, AI in entertainment. And like how the erstwhile Indian School of Business Model was, it was completely branching as to how you would love to do the same magic in the AI University and really create next-generation thought leaders and engineers, not only for Andhra Pradesh, but for the world.”
Lokesh said he has learned the importance of the need in building a strong team. “I think that’s very important because when I joined Heritage, we had a crisis. Things were not good. We were losing a lot of money because of our retail expansion. The diary was not bringing in that much profit. So, I had to decide early on, the direction or the trajectory of the business. Then I had to figure out whether the team members believed in that vision or not, and based on that, I had to make decisions. I think politics is all about that. Also. I think you need people who believe in your vision but also have the boldness to correct you when you are making mistakes. So in that sense, in terms of building your team, building the leadership in both organizations is something that I find very similar.”
After he graduated from Stanford University, Lokesh returned to India and took on the role of the Director at Heritage. He ran both private enterprises and then entered into politics.
Describing the differences between running a private enterprise and being elected government official, Lokesh had this to say: “They’re quite stark and quite different. In the private sector, when you are the boss, you decide the direction, and you understand the journey. The results speak for themselves. If one month you miss something, you know where to correct it. I think in politics, you only get elections once every five years at the state level, so it gets very difficult to figure out the right trajectory. It’s very important to remain grounded, meet people, hear from them, and understand whether what you are doing is right and whether what programs you are taking are meeting their aspirations or not. So for me, that was very, very important. I think both journeys are mutually exclusive.”
Recalling his experiences in politics and the road he has traveled, Lokesh reminded the audience of his journey in politics. “I’ve always broken the mold. Look, membership in the Telugu Desam party was never a smooth affair. And in 2014, I chose that as my focus area. Similarly, in 2019 when I had to contest the election, there was always a debate on which seat I should contest. You know, generally, per political legacy and people, second-generation, and third-generation politicians choose a safe seat. I chose Mangalagiri. Here is a seat that we have not won since 1985.” Despite being defeated in the Mangalagiri Assembly seat in 2019, Lokesh continued his work in the constituency and gained the public’s trust.
Regarding his loss in the Assembly elections in 2019 and recontest in 2024, Lokesh said, “A lot of people told me, why not contest from a safe seat. And I told them, I know, to take an easy route or exit that’s accepting defeat, and I am not going to. So I contested in the Mangalagiri Assembly seat again in 2024 and I am really proud to say that I won with the highest margin that Andhra Pradesh has ever seen, which is over 91,000 margin.
With his triumph, the TDP won the key Mangalagiri seat for the first time after nearly four decades. Lokesh is being credited for the TDP’s resurgence in Andhra Pradesh. “To be honest, this victory was certain, but I think this kind of mandate took everyone off guard. This mandate has increased our responsibility. It’s a great responsibility on our shoulders. We take it with all humility. The people of Andhra Pradesh have many aspirations, and as a government, we need to be focused on delivering on those aspirations. So, I think we are going to meet midway in terms of delivering on that.”
While discussing the Ministry formation in Andhra Pradesh, Lokesh offered to take on the Human Resource Development Ministry, which is one of the toughest ministries, with a lot of trade unions. “And I love the challenge, and it’s a great opportunity for me to shape the next-generation leaders, thinkers, engineers, scientists, doctors. So I always believe as leaders, you should take a road less traveled and transform it in your own way. And that is what I have learned in my political journey.”
Learning from past mistakes, Lokesh said, the current Ministry headed by the TDP is looking at business processes, and re-engineering the government, and I am looking at, how can we deliver seamless governance in the hands of people, in the hands of citizens. How do you make politicians and officers relevant in day-to-day governance, in any day-to-day citizens’ lives. So that’s where I believe technology will play an important role. But it is also important to transform our processes and re-engineer the processes, and this is what you will see happening in Andhra Pradesh in the upcoming months.”
Son of Andhra Pradesh chief minister N Chandrababu Naidu, the young and rising star of Indian politics, while referring to the lessons learned from his da, he said, “What I learned from my leader is to be very patient and passionate. If you look at his entire political journey, he has had great highs and great lows. He takes his highs just as he takes his lows. And for me, that has been a great lesson, and that’s what I’ve learned from him.”
Lokesh said, that a new state like Andhra Pradesh is presented with a unique opportunity, which is to decentralize development and not to center development around one city or one ecosystem. Way back in 2014, Mr. Chandrababu Naidu had a clear vision of which district should do what, and that’s why KIYA came to Anantapur, TCL, Foxconn came to Chittor and Bello, and where Amravati is like our state capital. From day one, Lokesh said, he strongly believed that Vishakhapatnam should be the state capital because it has the right ingredients. “Now let’s talk about what are those right ingredients. It has amazing connectivity. It has great engineering colleges and amazing talents. And I jokingly keep saying that if Bangalore were to marry Goa and have a child that would be Vishakhapatnam, it’s such a beautiful city, with a gorgeous ecosystem, and I truly believe that for it not only to survive, but to flourish Vishakhapatnam has all the right ingredients of a state capital.”
Recalling his childhood and his relationship with the legendary N T Ram Rao, Lokesh said, “NTR is larger than life, and from my childhood, that’s all I remember about him. He was a tall personality there, but he had a very emotional connection with all his grandchildren, and he personally named all of us. So, you know, I got my name because of him, and all my cousins have their names because of him. He had a lot of personal attachment with all of us, but honestly, we were just too many of us for him to spend time with and nurture aspirations and ambitions. But he was very humble. And every birthday, you know, we used to go meet with him, spend time with him. I remember this so well. That is the way he would show his love and affection for all of us. He has left behind a great legacy for us to lead from the front and to take it forward.”
Young Lokesh shared with the audience his works and interactions with the rural Andhra. “I had a great chance to interact with farmers across segments. So, I met with Palm oil farmers, Paddy farmers, Mango farmers, Date Farmers, Banana farmers, and Mirchi farmers. You know what was fascinating for me is that they’re working hard, they are investing money ahead of time, and they are not sure in the end, whether are they going to make money or not, and they are doing this every crop cycle. So the way I looked at it, I said, you know, there are two parts of this equation. One, we need to reduce the cost of production. Two, how do we grow commodities and variants of our commodities that we can take to the globe.”
Lokesh said that the Andhra state can play a very important role in guiding farmers. “There is a lot of work that we can do as a government in terms of guiding farmers, giving not just subsidies alone, but inputs, and even strengthening it with research stations and ensuring that the optimal output and productivity comes from the respective farm. So for me, that’s of great interest and passion.”
He went on to add, “It is very fascinating that these are interventions you will see at a policy level that will come up. And I truly believe that the Royal Sima region particularly has a great opportunity to leapfrog in agriculture. It has amazingly fertile soil and just giving water to drip and giving extension to the appropriate horticulture crop, I think can truly transform agriculture in that sense. And the last bit I’d like to add is technology plays an important role, more so from the government’s ability to map which commodities are being grown and in what quantities and how should government be prepared, in terms of sale price hikes or slumps.”
Lokesh has been credited with ushering in new technologies in all his work, with focus on transformation of the rural Andhra Pradesh. In May 2018, he won the Business World magazine “Digital Leader of the Year” at the Businessworld Digital India summit in New Delhi, recognizing the best utilization of technology in governance. The same year, the Kalam Centre for Livable Planet Earth and Sustainable Development recognized Lokesh’s efforts in the successful integration of technology in rural governance and awarded the innovation award to Andhra Pradesh in the Panchayat Raj and Rural Development category.
Sharing his thoughts on how Technology can play an important role in rural communities, Lokesh said, “Technology has changed all our lives. India has been lucky. We jumped the PC era and went straight to smartphones. There are more smartphones in India than there are toilets. That’s a known fact. I think that presents a unique opportunity in terms of governance. I think a government’s ability to forecast that, prepare for that, and guide and advise farmers for that, I think will be very important. And that’s something that we are working on this time.”
Lokesh shared a greater vision for Inda to be the leader in world economic growth. According to him, India needs to work on two fundamental things. Number one, India requires a lot of policy intervention at the national level to attract greater investments to our nation. See, today, honestly, it’s not just about competing amongst ourselves as states, but we are also competing with other countries. You know, I am competing with Vietnam to attract electronics investments. I am competing with Ecuador on Aqua exports. I am competing with other countries on Agri commodities. So it is very, very important that we create a very conducive environment for medium, large corporates, global corporates, to look at India. Second, it’s no longer about the ease of doing business. It is about the speed of doing business. So all the business process re-engineering that we are doing in our state is to focus on the speed of doing business.
“We will compete with other states, and we will create a very conducive environment in Andhra Pradesh in terms of attracting investments and grounding those industries,” Lokesh said.
Among the challenges his state faces, Lokesh pointed to how you translate the vision of the Chief Minister down to the grassroots life functioning. So, the Chief Minister has a clear vision to attract investment. At every meeting, he talks about how many jobs we create. “But the problem that I see, even at the grassroots level, at the field level, is there is still the need for greater momentum. The tendency is to tell how not to do things, and that’s the challenge that we struggle with. So we are in the process of bringing about that change, institutional change among the officers, among the political system in Andhra Pradesh to thrive and be very focused on getting investments and creating local jobs.”
On his ambitions to play a national role as leader of India, any role beyond Andhra Pradesh in the coming months and years, Lokesh was very candid. “Politics is one great field where you can positively or negatively influence people’s lives. Being a third-generation politician, I see this as a great opportunity to transform things. There are amazing aspirations at the grassroots level that it is important that we meet those aspirations and deliver and after that, it is for people to decide where I should be. So, you know, we are here. We are here to serve the people. We are here to create amazing policies and investments, create jobs, create ecosystems, and then it is for people to decide whether I should be a Delhi politician or a state politician.”
His advice to everyone, who wants to enter into politics has been, “first, you need to settle down financially. That is very, very important. Be financially stable, and come into politics to serve people. That should be a true calling, nothing but that, when that is clear, come to politics. And the only way that can be clear is when you have financial security when you don’t need to depend on politics for any income.”
Lokesh pointed out how his party has been attracting lots of new first-generation leaders to be part of the government. “I call ourselves as a university. We have this ability to create leaders who want to lead. We create leaders. We give people the opportunity to lead from the front. And if you look at it this time in the 160 seats that we contested, close to 70 of them are actually first-timers. If you look at it as an alliance, 17 out of the 25 ministers are first time ministers. So I think that’s what makes TDP unique.”
Lokesh said, “I think you should take life as it comes. Never carry stress home. There is no need to carry stress. So I believe that the stress of work should be left outside your door. When you go home. You should spend time with your family, no second thoughts about it. What I’ve realized is, when you are stressed and you make decisions, you end up making a lot of mistakes. When I feel a little bit of stress, I should want to breathe, and that de-stresses me, makes me, calm, and that enables me to make good decisions. If you want to achieve greater things in life, and if you want to leapfrog, then you will have to make certain sacrifices. And it’s not just you, it’s also your family. If there are no sacrifices, you really cannot achieve what you want in life.”
Lokesh said that one of the agendas with which his government working is, “how do we double the per capita income of Telugu people here in the US and all across the world. And one thing we want to work with IT services, and how do we skill up all our IT professionals in the US and across the world.” Lokesh commented on the renewed interest among non-resident Telugus and “this greater commitment, that let’s do it now, I see that in everyone. We really want to work hard and really do good for our state and as a Minister and part of a delegation, we are really excited to take all of you back and showcase what you can do best and what are areas that together we can work on in developing the state of Andhra Pradesh.”
According to Lokesh, AI is an area of great interest for us as a state of Andhra Pradesh and is open for doing business. “We are ready. We will match it with the speed of doing business. I am leading a delegation in which we have a very young officer who is the CEO of the economic development board. As you said, all of you have an interest not only in it. It could be tourism, it could be education, it could be healthcare. And as a state, we are ready. We are ready to make this an amazing journey, and together, I believe that all of us can transform the state of Andhra Pradesh.”
For more details, please visit: www.itserve.org
Iran Vows Retaliation Against Israel and U.S., Signals Potential Shift in Nuclear Stance
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has promised “a tooth-breaking response” directed at Israel and the United States “for what they are doing against Iran” and its proxies. His statement came shortly after Kamal Kharrazi, a close advisor, announced Iran’s capability to develop nuclear weapons and hinted at a possible policy shift regarding their use if faced with an existential threat. This rhetoric comes amid ongoing tensions with Israel, as both countries engage in a heated exchange.
Kharrazi explained that while Iran can produce nuclear arms, Khamenei’s fatwa, or religious ruling, currently prohibits their development. “If an existential threat arises, Iran will modify its nuclear doctrine. We have the capability to build weapons and have no issue in this regard,” Kharrazi said, speaking to Lebanon’s Al Mayadeen on Friday. This echoes Iran’s recent stance to potentially expand its ballistic missile range. “The only thing currently prohibiting this is the leader’s fatwa,” Kharrazi clarified, referring to Khamenei’s 2003 religious ruling.
General Mohammad Naeini, a spokesperson for Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, added to the intensifying tone, stating, “A decisive and strong response will be given to the enemy’s new aggression. The response will be beyond the enemy’s comprehension, strategic, and powerful.” He emphasized, “The enemy must learn its lesson that it cannot engage in any act of hostility without receiving a crushing response in return,” clearly referring to Israel.
Meanwhile, U.S. CIA Director William Burns recently said that while the United States lacks evidence of a definitive decision by Iran to construct a nuclear weapon, Iran could obtain the fissile material for an atomic bomb within a week if it decided to do so. According to a State Department spokesperson, the U.S. remains “very concerned” about Iran’s nuclear activities. “The president has made clear: We are committed to never letting Iran obtain a nuclear weapon—and we are prepared to use all elements of national power to ensure that outcome,” the spokesperson affirmed. U.S. intelligence assessments suggest Khamenei has not yet chosen to resume the nuclear weapons program. However, the spokesperson underscored that “we take any nuclear escalation by Iran incredibly seriously and will respond accordingly.”
In light of escalating tensions, the Pentagon recently announced plans to reposition military assets in the Middle East, deploying B-52 bombers, fighter jets, refueling aircraft, and Navy destroyers to the area, particularly as the Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group prepares to exit the region. Pentagon spokesperson Air Force Maj. Gen. Patrick Ryder stated, “Should Iran, its partners, or its proxies use this moment to target American personnel or interests in the region, the United States will take every measure necessary to defend our people.”
Iran has long denied pursuing nuclear weapons, pointing to Khamenei’s fatwa as evidence of its stance against such a program since it was effectively abandoned in 2003. However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently claimed Israel now has “unprecedented freedom of action” following recent airstrikes against Iran. He declared, “We can reach any place in Iran as necessary,” adding that his “supreme goal” is to prevent Iran from achieving nuclear weapon capability.
This week, Israel conducted three predawn strikes on Iranian military targets, which U.S. officials hoped would be the final exchange in an escalating conflict. The strikes followed Iran’s retaliatory missile launches at Israel, in response to the assassinations of Hamas and Hezbollah leaders, sparking further clashes between Israel and Hezbollah, as both vie for regional influence amid Israel’s recent focus shift from the war in Gaza to its Lebanese adversaries. The latest Iranian statements from Khamenei, made on the eve of the 1979 U.S. Embassy takeover anniversary in Tehran, indicate Iran may yet retaliate.
Iran initially downplayed the impact of Israel’s strikes, but recent days have seen an increase in militant language from its officials. Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Commander Hossein Salami warned of “an unimaginable response” for Israel’s assault, as reported by Tasnim, Iran’s semi-official news agency. IRGC Deputy Commander Ali Fadavi echoed this sentiment, vowing a “certain” response to Israel’s aggression. “For over 40 years we have never left an act of aggression unanswered, and we have the capability to target all of the Zionist regime’s assets in a single operation,” Fadavi said, referring to Israel.
Kharrazi also mentioned the erosion of diplomatic goodwill with European nations, which have traditionally served as Iran’s primary diplomatic channels. “In the matter of missile range, we have so far considered Western sensitivities, particularly those of the Europeans,” he remarked. “When they disregard our sensitivities, especially regarding the territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Iran, there is no reason for us to consider their concerns.” He indicated that, under such conditions, Iran might indeed extend the range of its missiles.
Iran’s nuclear program has been an ongoing source of concern for both the U.S. and Israel, with Tehran previously curbing its nuclear activities under a 2015 nuclear deal. This agreement, facilitated by then-President Barack Obama, offered Iran significant sanctions relief in exchange for limits on its nuclear program. However, in 2017, then-President Donald Trump withdrew the U.S. from the deal, arguing that it did not restrict Iran’s ballistic missile development nor diminish the influence of Iran’s regional proxies. Since the U.S. withdrawal, Iran has expanded its nuclear activities beyond the agreement’s terms and has restricted international inspectors from some nuclear sites.
Bibek Debroy: An Economist and Sanskrit Scholar Who Bridged Ancient Texts with Modern Economics
Bibek Debroy’s legacy is a rare blend of economic expertise and classical scholarship in Sanskrit, setting him apart as a notable economist with deep insights into ancient Indian literature. Known for his extensive work translating Sanskrit texts, Debroy undertook monumental projects like the Puranas, Valmiki’s Ramayana, and the Mahabharata. His interests spanned economics, culture, and the linguistic intricacies of Sanskrit, creating a unique intellectual profile. Beyond his translations, Debroy’s contributions ranged from railway reforms to economic research, while even exploring culturally niche subjects like the role of dogs in Indian society.
His academic pursuits in economics involved research on fundamental issues such as economic theory, income inequality, and infrastructure financing, which he explored across various roles within and outside of government positions. These often intersected with his scholarly engagements, marking him as an intellectual whose work crossed disciplinary lines. However, his career wasn’t without its controversies. One notable instance was in 2005 when, as Director of Research at the Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Contemporary Studies, he published a paper on economic freedom that rated Gujarat as the leading state in India. This research, conducted with support from the German organization Friedrich Naumann Stiftung and published by the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, reportedly led to his reassignment.
In a recent chapter of his career, Debroy resigned as Chancellor of the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics (GIPE) in September, following a court decision that provided relief to Vice-Chancellor Ajit Ranade, who had previously been removed from his position. Debroy had taken on the role of Chancellor in July, adding another respected institution to his career accomplishments. Reflecting on his life and contributions, he penned a column in The Indian Express, posing a poignant question just days before his passing: “What if I am not there? What indeed?”
An alumnus of Presidency College, Kolkata, Debroy’s academic foundation was further enriched by studies at Delhi School of Economics and Cambridge’s Trinity College. His extensive career included positions at Presidency College, the Gokhale Institute, the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, and as Director of a legal reform project with the Ministry of Finance and the UN Development Programme (UNDP). Debroy was also a member of the government think tank, NITI Aayog, until 2019, where he provided crucial insights on policy matters.
In 2016, Debroy chaired the committee that recommended the integration of the Rail Budget with the Union Budget, a significant shift that was implemented in the 2017-18 fiscal year. His interest in reform extended beyond government policy to cultural preservation through his translations, which aimed to make ancient Sanskrit texts accessible to the modern reader. His notable works include a ten-volume translation of the Mahabharata, a three-volume Ramayana by Valmiki, as well as the Shiva Purana and other Mahapuranas. In Sarama and Her Children, he explored themes within Hinduism and conveyed his personal admiration for dogs.
Following his passing, Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed heartfelt condolences, emphasizing Debroy’s broad scholarly influence. Modi stated, “Dr. Bibek Debroy ji was a towering scholar, well-versed in diverse domains like economics, history, culture, politics, spirituality, and more. Through his works, he left an indelible mark on India’s intellectual landscape.” He went on to say, “Beyond his contributions to public policy, he enjoyed working on our ancient texts, making them accessible to the youth.” Reflecting on his personal connection with Debroy, Modi added, “I have known Dr. Debroy for many years. I will fondly remember his insights and passion for academic discourse. Saddened by his passing away. Condolences to his family and friends. Om Shanti.”
Bibek Debroy’s scholarly journey and impactful work in both economics and ancient texts will remain a significant contribution to India’s cultural and intellectual legacy.
CMEs At AAPI’s GHS 2024t in New Delhi Offer Insights On Prevention Strategies, Role of Lifestyle Changes, and the Integration of Technology into Healthcare
“GHS 2024 has the highest caliber of internationally acclaimed faculty and will develop a very robust agenda in collaboration with leading experts from India and the United States,” Dr. Satheesh Kathula, President of The American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) said in his introductory remarks at the inauguration of the Continuing Medical Education (CME) at the 18th edition of the Global Healthcare Summit (GHS) held in New Delhi on October 20tjh, 2024.
“The six hours of clinical CME sessions with academicians from India and the US will offer unique opportunities for local medical staff and healthcare professionals to advance leanings and provide the best possible care for the people of India focusing on preventive medicine, lifestyle changes and the integration of modern technology into Medicine,” he added.
The scientific program and workshops of GHS were developed by leading experts with contributions by the Scientific Advisory Board and the International Scientific Committee. The workshops were led by world famous physicians on topics relevant to the needs of the time.
The sessions on Cancer Prevention Strategies: 2025 And Beyond was moderated by Dr. Manmeet Ahluwalia, who in his opening remarks stated that Cancer is one of the leading causes of death in India, while stressing the importance of preventive measures that will help save lives.
Dr. Satheesh Kathula, MD, FACP, DipABLM Hematologist/Oncologist, Dayton, OH, USA, AAPI President eloquently presented on the Role of Lifestyle Changes in Cancer Prevention. He highlighted said, “You cannot change your genes, but you can change your lifestyle to prevent diseases.” “Stop 3; Start 3.”
An Overview of Cancer Epidemiology in India was presented by Dr. Hari Sagiraju, Assistant Professor Preventive Oncology, National Cancer Institute-AIIMS, who advocated for an India-centric approach. Technological Innovations in Cancer Detection was presented by Manmeet Ahluwalia, MD, MBA Medical Oncologist, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Fl, USA. Dr. Nitesh Rohatgi Senior Director, Oncology, Fortis Healthcare shared with the delegates on the Rising Incidence, Lagging Screening: Addressing the Colorectal Cancer Burden in India.
Gurguram Developing Community-Based Cancer Prevention Programs was presented by Dr. Raghunadha Rao Digumarti MNJ institute of Oncology. The importance of Cancer screening & awareness: What everyone needs to know was the topic addressed by Dr. Harit Chaturvedi Chairman of the Max Institute of Cancer Care.
The session on Artificial Intelligence (AI) focusing on Navigating Clinical AI – Power: Velocity: Impact was presented by Dr. Nitesh Rohatgi Senior Director, Oncology, Fortis Healthcare.
A Roundtable Discussion on Integrating Technology in Public Health Programs Collaborative Efforts in Cancer Prevention Public-Private Partnerships in Cancer Prevention was enlightening to the audience on ways to incorporate modern technology into medical practice.
The session on Thinking Beyond Heart Attacks: Reducing Cardiometabolic Risk was moderated by Dr. Amit Govil. Dr. J C Mohan, Chairman, Institute of Heart and Vascular Disorders, Jaipur took the audience to a wider worldview of the Prevalence of Heart Disease and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in India.
Effective Risk Factors Management and Lifestyle Modifications was an insightful session by Dr. Sunil Kaza Cardiologist, Nashville, Tn, USA. “Do South Asians need their own Lipid Guidelines?” was the topic addressed by Dr. Raman Puri Cardiologist, Apollo Hospital, Delhi. Managing Subclinical Atherosclerosis — Prevent, Detect, and Pre-empt Heart Attacks in Young Southeast Asians; Role of CTA and Calcium Scoring were the topics inasightfuly addressed by Dr. Brahma Sharma Cardiologist, affiliated to Univ of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA.
Innovations in Reducing Cardiometabolic Risk; Thinking Outside the Box was yet another valuable topic addressed by an eminent group of panelists. Technological innovation CGMs, Devices, Apps, Websites and More was addressed by Dr. Brij Makkar Director, Diabetes and Obesity Center, Delhi.
Care Delivery Innovations: Time to Rethink and Transform Our Paradigms was addressed by Dr. Anuj Bhargava MD, MBA, CDCES, FACP, FACE CEO, My Diabetes Home CEO, Iowa Diabetes. The session on Managing Diabetes, Pre-Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome was presented by Kris Vijayaraghavan, MD, MD Cardiologist, Lipidologist and Endocrinologist Arizona, USA.
PSA – Quandaries and Conundrum was another important topic addressed by Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, MD, MS, FRCS Chairman, Urologic Clinics of North Florida, and the President Elect of AAPI.
The Summary Panel – Bringing it all together; Taking care of the whole patient and reducing global cardiometabolic risk through a combined effort was moderated by Dr. Vinayak Agrawal, Fortis Heart Institute.
In his closing remarks, Dr. Kathula said, “Local problems should find local solutions. What is popular and found effective in a White population cannot be often duplicated in India.” In addition, while complementing Dr. Lokesh Edara’s efforts in championing the cause of Global Medical Education, Dr. Kathula suggested that “we need to identify and support such champions in their mission to accomplish a lofty goal that helps realize the mission of AAPI.”
For more information about AAPI, please visit: www.aapiusa.org
India’s Rupee Struggles Amid Global Market Volatility and Domestic Challenges
In a recent social media post, an ardent supporter of India’s ruling party praised the rupee’s apparent strength compared to the Turkish lira, which has devalued by 92% against the Indian currency over the past 11 years. His message implied Turkey’s economic instability versus India’s resilience. Ironically, this comparison comes as the rupee itself hits record lows, hovering around 84 to the US dollar, with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) likely intervening to keep it from slipping further.
The rupee’s current challenges stem from various factors. Geopolitical instability in the Middle East has fueled volatility in oil prices, which, combined with high gold prices and an increased risk-averse attitude among investors, exerts further pressure on the currency. Recent weeks have seen consistent dollar sales from Indian state-run banks, driven by dollar purchases from both foreign banks and local oil firms. Meanwhile, foreign investors pulled over ₹20,000 crore from Indian equities in the past week alone and close to $10 billion this month, marking a level of selling pressure exceeding that seen during the COVID-19 pandemic and even the 2008 financial crisis. This intensified exit partly stems from a shift in investor focus to China’s economic stimulus measures and the recent wave of primary market offerings in India. Political uncertainties in the United States have also played a role.
The sell-off was further catalyzed by the Union Budget announcement this year. Shortly after the Finance Minister unveiled changes to capital gains tax in July, foreign institutional investors began reducing their positions. While some criticize these investors for causing instability, it’s crucial to remember their substantial contribution to India’s stock market in recent years. Yet, this foreign capital influx has done little to arrest the rupee’s depreciation over time.
Internationally, the Federal Reserve’s actions continue to loom large, with widespread speculation about its future policies. The U.S. economy’s strength has fueled a rally in the dollar, causing U.S. yields to rise, which, in turn, negatively impacts capital flows into emerging markets, including India.
Despite these significant pressures, some have mounted a spirited defense of the rupee’s decline, asserting that all emerging market currencies have been depreciating and that the rupee’s fall is primarily due to temporary capital outflows. But when examined more closely, such defenses often raise further questions.
For instance, it’s puzzling why India, which has prided itself on a high-growth trajectory, faces a currency slump comparable to other nations. A decade ago, Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke passionately about reversing the rupee’s weakness, warning in 2013 that the currency’s slide endangered India’s economic stability. At that time, the rupee hovered around 62 to the dollar, whereas it now trades below 84—a decline of over 25% in 10 years.
Another argument suggests it’s misleading to focus only on the rupee-dollar exchange rate. Yet, as critical sectors like oil and gas, power, and telecom depend heavily on imports, any weakening of the rupee against the dollar amplifies import costs. With nearly 90% of India’s imports invoiced in dollars, alongside exports, this dependence underscores the dollar’s influence over the rupee’s performance. Even though China represents a substantial share of India’s imports, prices are still primarily invoiced in dollars, keeping the rupee’s fortunes closely tied to the dollar rather than the yuan.
Attempts to diversify currency exposure have seen limited success. For example, the government’s efforts to expand rupee-rouble trade with Russia were hampered by sanctions on Russia, making policymakers cautious. Even Russia’s largest bank, Sberbank AG, was reportedly denied permission by the RBI to export 100 tonnes of Russian gold bars for sale in India due to “supervisory concerns.” Thus, for now, the rupee’s fate remains closely intertwined with the dollar.
This focus on the rupee’s trajectory brings us back to Modi’s early speeches, where he linked the rupee’s fall to corruption. In 2016, the government launched a drastic anti-corruption move through demonetization, causing a sharp drop in currency circulation. However, by 2024, currency in circulation has surged to over ₹34 trillion, more than twice the amount in the immediate aftermath of demonetization. This raises questions about whether currency strength can genuinely serve as a reliable indicator of governance.
Today, two major headwinds loom over the rupee. First, the currency’s ties to the Turkish lira may be more relevant than initially thought. According to the Democracy Report 2024 from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute, autocratization—a trend where countries shift towards authoritarianism—is ongoing in 42 nations, affecting 2.8 billion people or about 35% of the global population. With 18% of the world’s population, India accounts for nearly half of those living in autocratizing nations, according to the report.
The report points to India, alongside countries like Turkey, Mexico, Russia, and the Philippines, as examples of nations experiencing diminishing democratic freedoms. It details how India has seen a steady erosion in freedom of expression, independent media, civil society engagement, and religious freedoms. This shift towards autocracy, the report suggests, could be detrimental to a country’s “economic calling card”—its currency. With more than a decade of control over economic policy, the government can no longer attribute the rupee’s struggles to opposition forces.
Second, beyond political issues, India’s economic growth story also faces challenges. Indicators of urban consumption, from car sales to fast-moving consumer goods, suggest softening demand. Slowing airline passenger traffic and weaker-than-expected festive sales further reflect this trend. As consumer demand falters and salary growth stagnates, inflation remains a persistent issue, particularly in the realm of food prices. Without a robust growth trajectory, it becomes difficult to justify the rupee’s relative strength on the global stage.
Supporters of the rupee’s value often attempt to mitigate concerns by comparing it to currencies that have performed worse. In this view, pointing to the Turkish lira, the Iranian rial, or the Sierra Leonean leone serves as a reminder that India’s currency is not the weakest. Yet, this may not be enough to inspire confidence. For the rupee, a more realistic comparison might now involve looking to currencies lower in the hierarchy rather than seeking parity with stronger economies.
In this light, the rupee’s depreciation tells a broader story, reflecting not just the pressures of global market dynamics but also the unique set of political and economic challenges India currently faces. The question of currency strength is not merely academic; it touches on India’s standing on the global stage, its trade prospects, and its ability to remain resilient amid geopolitical uncertainties.
Indian PM Modi Warns Against ‘Digital Arrest’ Scams: Protect Yourself with These Steps
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently addressed the alarming rise of a sophisticated online scam referred to as “digital arrest,” cautioning citizens to stay vigilant. The scam has already cost unsuspecting victims millions of rupees, as fraudsters pose as police or tax officials and use elaborate tactics to convince their targets of false legal charges, often presented over video calls. This scam typically starts with the scammers introducing themselves as law enforcement officials, and they claim to have incriminating evidence against their victims, compelling them to cooperate by staying at home under a so-called “digital arrest.”
Modi clarified that there is no such concept as “digital arrest” in Indian law, stressing that no legitimate law enforcement or government agency would request sensitive personal information via phone or video calls. “The fraudsters impersonate police, Central Bureau of Investigation, narcotics, and at times central bank officials,” Modi explained, shedding light on the wide range of authority figures these scammers pretend to be.
These scammers go to great lengths to appear authentic. They typically operate from setups designed to mimic police stations, tax offices, or investigative agencies. This includes a backdrop that resembles official offices and uniforms that add an aura of legitimacy to their deception. In some cases, they even produce convincing but entirely fake ID cards. Through these means, the scammers successfully gain the trust of their victims by appearing as genuine officers or officials.
In typical scam scenarios, the victim is accused of serious offenses, often involving claims about illegal goods or illicit activity. Scammers might allege that the victim’s phone number has been linked to illegal activities, or that a package in their name contains illegal drugs. As part of their tactics, they may also employ deepfake technology to create fake videos or show fabricated arrest warrants, which appear convincing enough to unsettle victims into compliance.
Instances of this scam are becoming increasingly common. One recent case in August involved police in Bengaluru apprehending multiple individuals after a victim lost more than 20 million rupees (approximately $237,000 or £183,000) to this fraud. The victim was manipulated over a WhatsApp call where scammers claimed that a parcel addressed to him contained the banned substance MDMA. They demanded payment, threatening him with legal consequences if he failed to comply.
The fraudulent activities have reached notable figures as well. Maala Parvathi, a prominent actor in Malayalam-language cinema, recounted her experience of nearly falling victim to the scam. She disclosed to the media that scammers approached her with what appeared to be legitimate ID cards, identifying themselves as officers from the Mumbai Police. In a series of startling accusations, they alleged that she was involved in smuggling drugs to Taiwan and proceeded to place her under a “digital arrest” for further questioning. However, Parvathi was quick to recognize the ruse before any money exchanged hands.
Prime Minister Modi’s nationwide warning included a set of three essential steps to safeguard oneself against such scams. “First, stay calm and do not panic. Record or take a screen recording if possible,” Modi advised, highlighting the importance of maintaining composure when faced with threats from these fraudsters. “Second, remember that no government agency will threaten you online,” he emphasized, clarifying that genuine law enforcement procedures are not carried out through digital intimidation.
Lastly, Modi urged victims to report such incidents promptly. “Take action by calling the national cyber helpline and also inform police about the crime,” he said, underscoring the need for individuals to seek help from official channels. By following these steps, citizens can reduce their risk of falling prey to this scam, which continues to target individuals across various social and financial strata.
Hindu Americans’ Influence in US Politics Rises Amid Concerns Over Religious Freedom
The 2024 US elections may not place a Hindu in the White House, but the campaign season has underscored the rising influence of the world’s 1.2 billion Hindus in American politics.
While Vice President Kamala Harris, a Democratic candidate, identifies as a Christian, she has Hindu heritage through her Indian mother, Shyamala Gopalan, a Brahmin from India. On the Republican side, Usha Vance, the wife of Donald Trump’s running mate JD Vance, also hails from a Brahmin Hindu background. Across the nation, five Indian Americans hold seats in Congress, and nearly 50 occupy positions in state legislatures, representing Hindu, Sikh, or Muslim backgrounds.
The emergence of Hindu Americans in US politics has gained momentum over the last decade, although Dalip Singh Saund, the first Indian American Congressman, was elected in 1957. In 2023, Shri Thanedar, a Democratic representative, launched a caucus for Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, and Jain Americans, indicating the increasing presence of Indian Americans in politics. Though Hindu Americans represent only around 1% of the US population, their influence extends beyond numbers due to their high socioeconomic status. In 2022, the median household income for Indian Americans was $145,000, offering them the means to support political campaigns. “There was always a Hindu vote, which was not recognized publicly, but it is being recognized now,” said Democratic strategist Ramesh Kapur.
As Hindu influence grows in American politics, concerns arise back in India, where many Christians fear that the increasing political clout of Hindu Americans might embolden US policies that overlook religious freedom issues in India. Rajesh Sampath, a professor who converted to Catholicism, expressed unease over “the uncritical acceptance of the Indian American rise.” He warned that a lack of scrutiny into candidates’ views on Hindu nationalism or Hindutva could “have adverse effects on civil rights, not only for Indian Christians in India but also in terms of race and equality here in the US.”
Though Hindu politicians in the US come from both major political parties and embrace diverse domestic policies, some critics are troubled by their silence regarding religious freedom for minorities in India. For example, US arms deals with India have proceeded smoothly despite calls to designate it a “Country of Particular Concern” due to religious rights concerns. According to Neal Christie, executive director of the Federation of Indian American Christian Organizations, US policymakers hesitate to condemn India’s religious freedom violations due to “many lawmakers’ vested economic interests in India and their fear of backlash from Hindu nationalists in their constituencies.”
Allen Brooks of the Assam Christian Forum observed that while American politicians, particularly Hindu leaders, readily denounce attacks on Hindu temples in the US, they rarely speak out on abuses against minorities in India. Meanwhile, as China is increasingly seen as a geopolitical threat, US leaders of both parties have nurtured ties with Hindu nationalist groups to bolster trade and security partnerships with India. Sampath argued that these politicians “have cultivated significant ties with Hindu nationalists for geopolitical gains, prioritizing trade…over the pressing issue of religious freedom for minorities.”
Under Narendra Modi’s leadership, the influence of Hindu nationalism has extended overseas, with Hindu American groups supporting Indian organizations like Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) in their political outreach. John Dayal, a human rights activist, believes these groups promote values that resonate with segments of the Republican platform, aligning around themes of nationalism, tradition, and cultural identity. “Their main role for the moment is exonerating Prime Minister Modi and cleansing his image,” said Dayal. He warned that the “power wielded by affluent upper-caste Indian Americans” in politics and business could amplify such ideologies, posing potential risks.
This growing influence has raised concerns over the impact of Hindu American politicians on US foreign policy. Vivek Ramaswamy, a Republican candidate, praised Modi as an “excellent” leader who has “restored Indian national pride,” yet he made no reference to Modi’s record on human rights, drawing criticism from advocacy groups. Christie questioned the compatibility of Hindu American legislators’ values with principles of tolerance and fairness if they align with exclusionary nationalism in India. Dayal echoed these concerns, adding that organizations like the Hindu American Foundation (HAF) are perceived to advocate for India’s government interests while sanitizing Hindu nationalist actions.
A 2024 report from Political Research Associates alleged that HAF presents itself as a mainstream civil rights organization in the US, while opposing caste discrimination protections and supporting the BJP, India’s ruling Hindu nationalist party. By “capitalizing on fears of radical Muslims,” said Christie, the HAF advances a narrative that perpetuates harmful stereotypes against Christians in India, often labeled as “Rice Christians” for allegedly converting for material incentives.
As Hindu Americans’ political alignment shifts, data shows evolving affiliations. Although 68% of Indian Americans identify with the Democratic Party, a growing segment—29%—now leans Republican, according to a 2023 Pew Research study. The 2024 Asian American Voter Survey revealed that only 46% of Indian Americans plan to vote for Joe Biden, down from 65% in 2020. While this survey did not ask directly about Kamala Harris, it found that 54% of Indian Americans viewed her favorably. However, some Hindu voters criticize Harris and Biden for policies perceived as indifferent to their views on religious freedom and US-India relations. Political scientist Sangay Mishra observed that “Hindu Americans are increasingly framing their political choices around support for India,” and viewing Democratic critiques of Indian policies as antagonistic.
On the Republican side, candidates like Ohio state lawmaker Niraj Antani have emphasized their Hindu identity, advocating for religious freedom and traditional values. Antani frequently references his Hindu faith, recently praising the opening of the Ram temple in Ayodhya, India, a symbol of Hindu nationalist pride.
The Indian Christian community in the US, however, remains cautious. When Modi visited Biden in 2023, protests erupted in the US against rising violence in the Indian state of Manipur, where over 200 Christians had died in communal violence. These protests continued, as Indian expats and Christians staged prayer vigils in six American cities, urging peace in India. Despite this, Christie noted that many Indian American Christians avoid speaking out, fearing repercussions that might jeopardize their safety, financial stability, or citizenship.
“Indian American Christians are a minority within the minority,” Sampath explained, “trying to survive as an Indian Christian minority within the larger Indian diaspora.” Christie emphasized that religious advocacy shouldn’t be selective, suggesting, “If we benefit Muslims, Christians will benefit… Human rights is not a zero-sum game.”
BRICS Nations Urge Global Cooperation in Kazan Declaration on Ukraine, Middle East, and Financial Reform
In their latest summit, the BRICS nations issued a comprehensive declaration addressing critical global issues, from the ongoing conflict in Ukraine to humanitarian crises in the Middle East, and highlighted their collective stance on Western sanctions and the need for financial reform. The declaration, reflecting the shared priorities and concerns of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, emphasized mediation in global conflicts, fairer international trade, and a focus on regional development.
Position on Ukraine
The BRICS nations underscored the importance of adhering to the principles outlined in the United Nations Charter, specifically calling on states to act in line with the Charter’s purposes to achieve lasting peace. “We emphasize that all states should act consistently with the Purposes and Principles of the UN Charter in their entirety and interrelation,” the statement noted. The group also acknowledged existing mediation proposals, expressing hope for a peaceful resolution through diplomacy and dialogue.
Concern Over the Middle East Conflict
The declaration expressed deep concern over the deteriorating humanitarian situation in the Palestinian territories, particularly the heightened violence in Gaza and the West Bank. “We reiterate our grave concern at the deterioration of the situation and humanitarian crisis in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, in particular the unprecedented escalation of violence in the Gaza Strip and in West Bank as a result of the Israeli military offensive,” the statement read, condemning the violence that has resulted in civilian casualties, displacement, and significant damage to infrastructure. The group also voiced alarm over the recent escalation in Southern Lebanon, condemning attacks that have affected civilian lives and called for an immediate end to military aggression.
Opposition to Western Sanctions
The BRICS bloc criticized the impact of unilateral sanctions imposed by Western nations, emphasizing their “disruptive effect on the world economy, international trade, and sustainable development goals.” The group highlighted the sanctions as a barrier to achieving broader economic stability and growth, particularly in emerging economies.
Reform of the Global Financial System
A critical component of the declaration was the BRICS’ stance on the need to reform the international financial architecture. “We underscore the need to reform the current international financial architecture to meet the global financial challenges,” they stated, stressing the importance of a more inclusive and fair global financial governance structure to support economic stability and address the needs of developing nations.
BRICS Grain Exchange Initiative
In a step toward greater economic collaboration within the bloc, BRICS welcomed a Russian proposal for a BRICS Grain Exchange. This proposed platform would initially serve as a commodities trading exchange and aims to expand to other agricultural sectors over time, helping member countries to bolster food security and streamline commodity trade.
Cross-Border Payment System
The Kazan declaration recognized the potential benefits of creating a cross-border payment system that is fast, low-cost, and accessible. “We recognize the widespread benefits of faster, low-cost, more efficient, transparent, safe, and inclusive cross-border payment instruments,” the declaration noted, highlighting the potential of this system to reduce trade barriers and foster financial integration. Additionally, the statement welcomed the use of local currencies in transactions among BRICS nations and their partners, which could ease trade and reduce dependency on a single global currency.
Consideration of BRICS Clear Depository
A novel concept introduced at the summit was BRICS Clear, a proposed independent cross-border settlement and depository infrastructure to complement the current financial market systems. The BRICS members agreed to study its feasibility, which would include voluntary participation and the potential for an independent (Re)Insurance Company. This infrastructure could bolster regional financial stability by reducing reliance on external institutions.
Encouraging Financial Innovation
The BRICS Interbank Cooperation Mechanism (ICM) is focusing on innovative financial practices to improve financing within the bloc. The group supports expanding financing mechanisms for projects within BRICS countries, particularly those involving local currencies, thereby promoting economic resilience and stability across their markets.
Support for the IMF and Global Safety Net
In their declaration, BRICS reaffirmed a commitment to a strong International Monetary Fund (IMF) with an adequate quota-based safety net. They highlighted the IMF’s central role in the Global Financial Safety Net, advocating for resources that reflect global economic realities and ensure financial resilience.
Commitment to G20 Cooperation
BRICS acknowledged the significance of the G20 as a platform for global economic collaboration, calling for continued cooperation based on consensus-driven outcomes. “We recognize the importance of the continued and productive functioning of the G20, based on consensus with a focus on result-oriented outcomes,” the statement noted, reflecting the bloc’s commitment to multilateral solutions.
Prevention of Future Pandemics
Learning from recent global health crises, BRICS voiced support for initiatives aimed at preventing future pandemics. This includes backing for the BRICS R&D Vaccine Center and the establishment of an Integrated Early Warning System to detect and respond to emerging infectious disease threats. Such initiatives demonstrate BRICS’ prioritization of public health as a critical aspect of regional and global security.
Support for Big Cats Conservation
Recognizing the environmental and cultural significance of preserving vulnerable big cat species, BRICS applauded India’s proposal for an International Big Cats Alliance. “While appreciating the efforts of our countries to preserve rare species and noting the high vulnerability of big cats,” the statement read, the BRICS nations pledged to work together to support conservation efforts. This reflects BRICS’ commitment to biodiversity and shared environmental goals.
The Kazan declaration addresses pressing global issues, advocating for peace, economic stability, and cooperative measures within the BRICS bloc. The document reflects a unified stance on a range of complex issues, calling for reforms in global financial systems, humanitarian support, and initiatives to prevent future pandemics and protect biodiversity. The declaration highlights BRICS’ ambition to play a pivotal role in reshaping the world order, promoting regional interests and striving for a balanced approach to international relations.
https://www.reuters.com/world/factobox-main-points-brics-declaration-2024-10-23/
PM Modi Calls for ‘Three Mutuals’ in Meeting with Xi Jinping, Stresses Importance of Trust and Stability
Prime Minister Narendra Modi highlighted the need for India-China relations to be based on three key principles: mutual trust, mutual respect, and mutual sensitivity, during a significant meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. This meeting, held on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia, marks the first delegation-level engagement between the two countries in nearly five years.
During the conversation, Modi expressed optimism about the future of India-China relations, provided that these three mutuals are respected. “We welcome the consensus reached on issues that have arisen across the border in the last four years. Maintaining peace and stability on the border should remain our top priority. Mutual trust, mutual respect, and mutual sensitivity form the basis of our relations,” he stated.
Modi’s comments underscored the importance of maintaining peaceful relations between India and China, not just for the sake of the two nations but also for broader global stability and progress. Xi Jinping echoed these sentiments, acknowledging the significance of the meeting for both countries and the global community. “China and India are both ancient civilizations, major developing countries, and important members of the Global South. We are both at a crucial phase in our respective modernization endeavours. It best serves the fundamental interests of our two countries and two peoples for both sides to keep the trend of history in the right direction of our bilateral relations,” Xi said.
He further stressed the importance of increasing communication and cooperation between India and China. According to Xi, “It’s important for both sides to have more communication and cooperation, properly handle our differences and disagreements and to facilitate each other’s pursuit of development aspirations.” He also emphasized the need for both nations to take responsibility on the international stage, particularly in representing the interests of developing countries. “It’s also important for both sides to shoulder our international responsibility, set an example for boosting the strength and unity of the developing countries and to contribute to promoting multipolarization and democracy in international relations,” Xi added.
This meeting represents a crucial step forward after the tensions that erupted between India and China in 2020, following the deadly clash in the Galwan Valley, along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). The confrontation led to a significant downturn in bilateral relations, particularly concerning military and border security issues.
However, the recent breakthrough in talks was facilitated by both countries’ diplomatic and military negotiators, who had been working closely over the past several weeks. According to Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, both sides had maintained regular contact through various forums, which eventually led to an agreement on patrolling the LAC. This agreement aims to resolve the ongoing issues and de-escalate the confrontation along the 3500-km-long border.
Misri confirmed the breakthrough, stating, “The Indian and Chinese diplomatic and military negotiators have been in close contact with each other in a variety of forums over the last several weeks after which an agreement was arrived at on patrolling arrangements along the LAC, leading to disengagement and a resolution of the issues that had arisen in the specific areas in 2020.”
Further confirmation came from the Chinese government on Tuesday, when the Chinese Foreign Ministry acknowledged the new patrolling arrangements along the India-China border. This confirmation coincided with Xi Jinping’s departure for the BRICS Summit in Kazan.
Tensions had been particularly high due to Chinese attempts to transgress the LAC in other parts of the Western Sector. Both countries had been discussing these incursions through established diplomatic and military channels, aiming to find a peaceful resolution to the situation.
On Monday, India’s External Affairs Minister, S. Jaishankar, expressed cautious optimism about the new agreement, noting that it lays the groundwork for restoring peace along the border. Jaishankar also emphasized that restoring the status quo before 2020 had been a central concern for India in terms of normalizing relations with China. He remarked that the agreement was a step in the right direction toward achieving that goal.
“The latest agreement creates the basis for peace and tranquillity which should be there in the border areas and existed before 2020 – something which had been India’s major concern over the past few years for the bilateral relationship to turn normal,” Jaishankar said.
He further reflected on the patience required to reach this point. “At various points of time, people almost gave up. We have always maintained that on the one hand, we had to obviously do the counter deployments… But, side by side, we have been negotiating since September 2020 when I met my Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in Moscow. It has been a very patient process, maybe more complicated than what it could and should have been,” Jaishankar noted.
The agreement on patrolling arrangements at the LAC, he said, represents a significant achievement after years of delicate negotiations. “The fact is that if we are able to, as we now have, reach an understanding regarding patrolling and observing the sanctity of the LAC, then, I think, it creates the basis for peace and tranquillity which there should be in border areas and existed there before 2020,” Jaishankar explained.
The meeting between Modi and Xi in Kazan signifies a notable shift in the trajectory of India-China relations, especially considering the contentious history between the two nations in recent years. Both leaders appeared committed to pursuing a more constructive and peaceful relationship, with a focus on mutual trust, cooperation, and respect for each other’s aspirations.
This renewed commitment from both sides offers hope for a more stable and peaceful future along the India-China border, which has been a source of significant tension since the Galwan Valley clash. As Modi and Xi agreed, maintaining peace and stability on the border remains a priority, and the success of this agreement could pave the way for further positive developments in the bilateral relationship.
Emmy-Nominated Filmmaker Tirlok Malik’s On Golden Years to be shown at Prestigious Teaneck Film Festival 2024 on November 10 at 11:30 AM
Teaneck, NJ – Emmy-nominated filmmaker Tirlok Malik’s celebrated film ‘On Golden Years,’ will be showcased at the prestigious Teaneck International Film Festival 2024 on Sunday, November 10, at 11:30 AM at Teaneck Cinemas (503 Cedar Lane, Teaneck, NJ 07666).
‘On Golden Years’ is a major highlight in Malik’s career, known for exploring the immigrant experience in America through films such as ‘Lonely in America,’ ‘Khushiyaan,’ and ‘Love Lust and Marriage.’ During his illustrious career, Tirlok Malik has worked with industry stalwarts like Rajinikanth, Kamal Haasan, Mammootty, Sunny Deol, and Kangana Ranaut, among others. Malik, along with the cast of ‘On Golden Years,’ will be present for a special Q&A session following the screening at the Teaneck Film Festival 2024.
‘On Golden Years’ is an 85-minute romantic comedy-drama that delves into the complex emotions immigrants face when they reach the retirement phase of the American Dream. The film is set in Shantiniketan, the only Indian retirement community in the United States, located in Florida. Through its relatable characters and emotional storylines, the film explores themes of aging, identity, and reconciliation between regrets and contentment. It asks the poignant question: Where do we truly belong at the end of life’s journey?
The film stars Ranjit Chowdhry, the iconic actor known for his performances in ‘Lonely in America’ and ‘The Office,’ Jyoti Singh, Reeves Lehmann, Shetal Shah, Noor Naghmi, Prof. Indrajit S Saluja, and Tirlok Malik himself. The film also features several new talents making their debut, adding to the fresh yet familiar energy of the story.
The film is co-produced by Iggy Ignatius who is also the co-director of the film. The film has been shot at the Indian retirement community Shantiniketan in Florida founded by Iggy Other credits of the film are Director of Photography Christo Bakalov B.A.C., Music by Peter Lobo, Art Direction by Sunita Babber, Editing by Tom Knight and others.
‘On Golden Years’ also boasts the film debut of the Grammy Award-winning Indian-American singer Falu, who performs the item number song ‘Raba Raba.’ Falu had previously performed at prestigious venues like Carnegie Hall and The White House in the presence of President Barack Obama and Oprah Winfrey, alongside music legend A.R. Rahman. Falu’s ‘Abundance in Millets’ song featuring the Indian PM Narendra Modi was also recently nominated for Grammy.
The screening of ‘On Golden Years’ at the Teaneck International Film Festival is proudly sponsored by David Nachman, Esq., Managing Attorney at Nachman, Phulwani, Zimovcak (NPZ) Law Group, P.C., New Jersey, a law firm specializing in immigration services and law.
Written and directed by Tirlok Malik, ‘On Golden Years’ reflects his signature focus on the Indian-American immigrant experience. Malik, who is an Indian-American and a proud New Yorker, has made films that resonate with global audiences by addressing the challenges and rewards of living abroad. His films often highlight the conflict between holding onto one’s roots and embracing the new life and challenges that come with migration.
Malik says, “The immigrant experience is often accompanied by dreams, struggles, and sacrifices, but the journey to the American Dream doesn’t end after reaching success. Retirement brings its own set of challenges, especially for immigrants trying to find where they belong.”
The Teaneck International Film Festival, founded over 20 years ago with support from the nonprofit organization Puffin Foundation, Ltd., is renowned for its commitment to showcasing socially conscious films that inspire conversations on critical global and local issues.
Tickets for the Teaneck Film Festival screening of ‘On Golden Years’ are now on sale for $10 and can be purchased at TeaneckFilmFestival.org.
Don’t miss the chance to see this heartfelt, humorous, and thought-provoking film and engage in a discussion with Tirlok Malik and the star-studded cast after the screening.
BRICS Summit Highlights Putin’s Global Coalition Amid Geopolitical Tensions
Nearly three years after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which resulted in widespread condemnation of Moscow by countries around the world, Russian leader Vladimir Putin is hosting a summit that signals a shift in global alliances. This event marks the rise of an emerging coalition of countries that, contrary to popular belief, stand behind Russia.
The BRICS summit, a gathering of significant emerging economies—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—began in the southwestern Russian city of Kazan on Tuesday. This is the first meeting since the group expanded earlier this year, bringing in Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, and Iran. The three-day summit is expected to be one of the most significant international gatherings Russia has hosted since the war in Ukraine began.
On the summit’s first day, Putin met with Chinese President Xi Jinping, afterward describing their partnership as a “model of how relations between states should be built.” Other notable attendees include Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Iranian official Masoud Pezeshkian, and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is also expected to attend, while Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva canceled his participation due to an injury.
This summit offers Putin an opportunity to demonstrate that Russia is not isolated, but rather a part of a growing group of nations looking to shift the global balance of power. For countries like Russia, China, and Iran, this summit presents a chance to counter the influence of the United States and the West.
Both Putin and Xi are expected to project a message that the West, with its sanctions and alliances, is the party that is truly isolated. They plan to emphasize that a “global majority” stands behind them in challenging American dominance. Putin even stated on Friday that the growing political and economic power of BRICS nations is an “undeniable fact,” and added that if BRICS and interested countries work together, they “will be a substantial element of the new world order.” However, Putin denied that BRICS is an “anti-Western alliance.”
The timing of the summit is especially significant, coming just days before the U.S. elections. A potential victory for former President Donald Trump could bring changes to U.S. policy, including a reduction in support for Ukraine, which would further alter the global dynamics.
Alex Gabuev, director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center in Berlin, noted that this summit is a major win for Putin. “The message will be: how can you talk about Russia’s global isolation when all these leaders are coming to Kazan?” Gabuev said. According to him, Russia aims to present BRICS as a leading force in driving the world toward a more equitable global order.
However, the unity Putin might hope for among these leaders is limited. BRICS countries have diverse viewpoints and interests, making it difficult for the group to present a unified message, especially one that would align with Putin’s desires.
The contrasts at this year’s gathering are stark, especially compared to last year’s BRICS summit in Johannesburg, where Putin was only able to attend via video link due to an International Criminal Court arrest warrant for alleged war crimes related to Ukraine. Now, Putin is at the helm of the first BRICS summit since the group’s expansion, hosting leaders against a backdrop of shifting global crises.
Although BRICS is primarily focused on economic collaboration, the war in Ukraine dominated last year’s summit. This year, that conflict remains, but leaders are also expected to address the escalating situation in the Middle East, where Israel is engaged in battles with Iranian proxies. Putin has confirmed that Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas will join the summit, and the Russian president is likely to use the anger many in the Global South feel toward the U.S. for its support of Israel to further his argument for a new global order without the U.S. in control.
Both Russia and China have called for a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas conflict, while the U.S. has defended Israel’s right to retaliate against militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah. Many BRICS leaders view the situation in the Middle East as an example of why their group should have more global influence, according to Jonathan Fulton, a senior non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council. However, Fulton noted that these leaders are using the conflict more as a way to criticize the status quo rather than taking action to resolve it.
Observers will also be watching to see if China and Brazil use the summit to promote their joint peace proposal for the war in Ukraine, as they did at the recent United Nations General Assembly. At that time, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky criticized their plan, saying it would benefit Moscow and telling Beijing and Brasilia, “you will not boost your power at Ukraine’s expense.”
The upcoming U.S. elections and the challenges Zelensky faces in promoting his own plan to end the war have created an opportunity for China to further its position on Ukraine, according to Gabuev.
The summit will also give Putin the chance for one-on-one meetings with fellow BRICS leaders and other dignitaries in attendance. Iran’s recent inclusion in BRICS strengthens Russia’s relationship with Tehran, which has reportedly supplied Moscow with drones and short-range ballistic missiles for use in the war, though Iran denies this. Meanwhile, China has been accused of indirectly supporting Russia’s war effort by providing dual-use goods like machine tools and microelectronics, claims that Beijing denies, maintaining that its trade with Russia is normal and that it is neutral in the conflict.
Leaders at the summit are expected to discuss efforts to establish a system for settling payments outside of the U.S. dollar-based system, using BRICS currencies and banking networks. This move could provide economic benefits but also help member countries like Russia bypass Western sanctions. The leaders are also likely to discuss cooperation in areas such as energy, technology, and satellite data sharing.
However, despite these goals, the divisions among BRICS countries remain a challenge. The group has always been an amalgamation of countries with different political and economic systems, which complicates its ability to act as a unified bloc.
The first BRICS summit in 2009 brought together Brazil, Russia, India, and China as emerging markets before expanding to include South Africa. The group launched the New Development Bank in 2015 to act as a counterpart to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. While BRICS has focused on increasing its global influence, internal differences continue to limit its potential.
India and China, for instance, have long-standing tensions over their border, yet they form two critical pillars of BRICS. These divisions have become more apparent as relations between the U.S. and China have grown strained, while India has moved closer to the U.S.
As BRICS expands and more than 30 additional countries express interest in joining or cooperating with the group, these geopolitical tensions further complicate its direction. Manoj Kewalramani, head of Indo-Pacific studies at the Takshashila Institution in India, noted that China and Russia have attempted to reposition BRICS as a counterbalance to Western dominance, but new and aspiring members may not want to choose sides. Instead, they are looking to grow their economies and engage with the world pragmatically, rather than ideologically.
Elon Musk and Mukesh Ambani Set to Compete for India’s Satellite Broadband Market
The rivalry between two of the world’s wealthiest individuals, Elon Musk and Mukesh Ambani, is escalating as they prepare to compete in India’s satellite broadband sector. This competition intensified after the Indian government’s recent announcement that satellite spectrum for broadband would be allocated through an administrative process instead of an auction, a decision that has sparked debate.
Previously, Elon Musk had expressed his disapproval of the auction model, which was supported by Mukesh Ambani. Satellite broadband is designed to provide internet access across vast areas covered by the satellite, making it an ideal solution for rural or remote locations where traditional internet options like DSL, which uses telephone lines, or cable services are not available. This technology is seen as an essential tool for closing the digital divide in hard-to-reach regions.
While India’s telecom regulator has yet to reveal the pricing details for satellite spectrum, commercial satellite internet services are expected to roll out soon. Projections from credit rating agency ICRA indicate that satellite internet subscribers in India could reach two million by 2025. The sector is growing increasingly competitive, with several key players entering the race, including Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Jio.
Jio, already a dominant force in India’s telecom industry due to massive investments in airwave auctions, has partnered with SES Astra, a satellite operator based in Luxembourg. SES Astra uses medium-Earth orbit (MEO) satellites, which operate at a higher altitude and are known for being more cost-effective, unlike Musk’s Starlink, which relies on low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellites positioned between 160 and 1,000 kilometers from Earth. LEO satellites generally offer faster services but are more expensive to deploy and maintain.
Starlink already has 6,419 satellites in orbit and serves four million subscribers across 100 countries. Musk has been aiming to launch Starlink services in India since 2021, but regulatory hurdles have delayed these plans. If Starlink enters the Indian market, it could provide a significant boost to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s initiative to attract foreign investment. This move might also enhance the government’s reputation as business-friendly, countering perceptions that its policies primarily benefit Indian business magnates like Ambani.
India’s decision to allocate satellite spectrum administratively, rather than through an auction, aligns with international norms, according to the government. Auctions have previously generated substantial revenue for India, but in this case, the government defends the administrative allocation as being in line with global practices. According to Gareth Owen, a technology analyst at Counterpoint Research, spectrum auctions are rare for satellite broadband because the high costs involved could negatively affect the business’s financial viability. He added that an administrative allocation allows the spectrum to be distributed fairly among qualified players, giving Starlink a chance to compete.
However, Reliance has advocated for an auction, arguing that it is necessary to ensure fair competition, especially in the absence of clear legal provisions in India on how satellite broadband services can be provided directly to consumers. In a series of letters sent to India’s telecom regulator, Reliance emphasized the importance of creating a level playing field between satellite and terrestrial broadband services. The company noted that advances in satellite technology have “blurred the lines between satellite and terrestrial networks,” meaning satellite-based services are no longer restricted to underserved areas.
One of the letters from Reliance stated, “Spectrum assignment should be done through auctions as per Indian telecom laws, except in specific cases where public interest or economic reasons justify administrative allocation.” In response to reports that Ambani was lobbying the government to reconsider its position on spectrum allocation, Musk reacted on X (formerly Twitter), saying, “I will call [Mr Ambani] and ask if it would not be too much trouble to allow Starlink to compete to provide internet services to the people of India.”
Gareth Owen suggests that Ambani’s opposition to the administrative allocation could be part of a broader strategy to outbid Musk in an auction, potentially blocking Starlink’s entry into the Indian market. This would not only protect Ambani’s interests but also cement Reliance’s dominance in India’s telecom sector.
Ambani is not the only one backing the auction process. Sunil Mittal, chairman of Bharti Airtel, India’s second-largest telecom operator, has also voiced support for the auction model. Mittal believes that companies seeking to serve high-end urban customers should “take telecom licenses and buy spectrum like everyone else.” Airtel and Reliance together control 80% of India’s telecom market.
Mahesh Uppal, a telecommunications expert, views this resistance as a “defensive move aimed at raising costs for international players seen as long-term threats.” He believes that while satellite technology may not pose an immediate threat, it is advancing rapidly, and traditional telecom companies fear that satellite-based services could soon challenge their dominance in the market.
The potential market in India is immense, as nearly 40% of the country’s 1.4 billion people still lack internet access, with most of these unconnected individuals living in rural areas. In comparison, China has around 1.09 billion internet users, which is significantly higher than India’s 751 million users. While India’s internet adoption rate remains below the global average of 66.2%, recent studies suggest that the country is steadily closing the gap.
Satellite broadband has the potential to help bridge this digital divide, particularly in rural regions and in the internet of things (IoT) ecosystem, where everyday objects are connected to the internet. However, pricing will be a crucial factor in determining the success of satellite internet services in India. Mobile data in India is among the cheapest in the world, costing just 12 cents per gigabyte, according to Prime Minister Modi.
Prasanto K Roy, a technology analyst, predicts that a price war between Starlink and Indian operators is inevitable. “Musk has deep pockets,” Roy said. “There’s no reason why he cannot offer a year of free services in some places to gain a foothold in the domestic market.” In fact, Starlink has already reduced prices in countries like Kenya and South Africa.
Nevertheless, entering the Indian market may not be straightforward for Musk. A 2023 report by EY-Parthenon highlights that Starlink’s costs are nearly ten times higher than those of Indian broadband providers, which could make it difficult for the company to compete unless it receives government subsidies.
Despite these challenges, some of the concerns raised by Indian telecom operators may be overstated. Gareth Owen points out that businesses are unlikely to switch entirely to satellite broadband unless there is no alternative, as terrestrial networks will always be less expensive than satellite systems, except in sparsely populated areas.
While Musk’s Starlink may have a first-mover advantage, satellite markets are known for being slow to develop. Still, the rivalry between Musk and Ambani in this space is only just beginning.
India’s Commitment to BRICS: A Platform for Global Dialogue and Development
India places great importance on its cooperation within BRICS, a significant platform for addressing key global developmental issues, Prime Minister Narendra Modi stated on Tuesday. The Prime Minister made these remarks before embarking on a two-day visit to Kazan, Russia, for the 16th BRICS summit.
“The expansion of BRICS with the addition of new members last year has added to its inclusivity and agenda for the global good,” PM Modi emphasized. His statement reflected India’s commitment to the group’s growth and its role in shaping the global discourse.
The BRICS summit, hosted by Russia this year, is being viewed as an effort by non-Western nations to strengthen their global influence, especially in light of ongoing global conflicts such as the war in Ukraine and the escalating situation in West Asia. The meeting provides an opportunity for member countries to discuss pressing international concerns and further their shared interests.
During his visit, PM Modi is set to hold several bilateral meetings, including discussions with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping. These meetings are expected to take place on the sidelines of the summit. This year’s summit is of particular significance as it will be the first one after BRICS expanded its membership in Johannesburg in 2023.
“India values the close cooperation within BRICS which has emerged as an important platform for dialogue and discussion on issues concerning the global developmental agenda, reformed multilateralism, climate change, economic cooperation, building resilient supply chains, and promoting cultural and people-to-people connectivity, among others,” said PM Modi in his departure statement. This highlights India’s multifaceted engagement with BRICS and its interest in addressing a broad range of issues that are crucial to global stability and progress.
Modi’s visit to Kazan is expected to further strengthen the ‘Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership’ between India and Russia. He reiterated the importance of this partnership by recalling his previous visit to Moscow in July 2024, where he held discussions with President Putin. The ongoing dialogue between the two countries underlines the deep historical and strategic ties they share.
“Building upon the annual summit held in July 2024 in Moscow, my visit to Kazan will further reinforce the Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership between India and Russia,” Modi said. His words suggest that the Kazan visit will serve as a continuation of the strong bilateral relationship that India and Russia have cultivated over the years.
Aside from reinforcing ties with Russia, Modi expressed his anticipation of meeting with other BRICS leaders. “I look forward to meeting other leaders from BRICS as well,” he said. His statement reflects India’s eagerness to strengthen relationships within the group, particularly as it plays a pivotal role in promoting a more balanced global order.
In a post on ‘X’ (formerly known as Twitter), PM Modi mentioned that he was looking forward to engaging in wide-ranging discussions at the summit. The summit’s agenda is expected to cover various important topics, including global economic trends, regional security, and the expansion of BRICS’ role on the world stage. India’s active participation in these discussions underscores its aspiration to influence global policies through multilateral platforms like BRICS.
The BRICS grouping, which originally consisted of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, was formally established after a meeting of these countries’ leaders in St. Petersburg in 2006. South Africa joined the group in 2010, transforming BRIC into BRICS and further diversifying the group’s representation.
Last year, BRICS underwent its first membership expansion since South Africa’s inclusion. The expansion added four new members: Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates. “The expansion of BRICS with the addition of new members last year has added to its inclusivity and agenda for the global good,” Modi highlighted, indicating how the growth of the group enhances its influence and scope in addressing global challenges.
This expansion has been widely regarded as a strategic move by BRICS, enabling it to bring in diverse perspectives from countries across different regions. It also signals the growing importance of BRICS as a counterbalance to Western-led multilateral organizations, particularly at a time when global tensions are on the rise. With the inclusion of new members, BRICS is positioned to have a broader impact on world affairs, and India’s role within the group continues to be crucial in shaping its direction.
India’s commitment to the BRICS framework stems from its belief in a multipolar world where emerging economies can have a greater say in global governance. The platform allows member nations to collaborate on critical issues such as economic growth, sustainable development, and political cooperation, giving them the opportunity to contribute to the global order more effectively. As Modi mentioned, BRICS is instrumental in advancing discussions on issues like reformed multilateralism, climate change, and economic partnerships.
Moreover, India sees BRICS as a key platform for promoting inclusive growth and development across the Global South. The addition of new members from Africa and the Middle East further amplifies this mission. Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the UAE bring unique geopolitical perspectives and economic potential to the group, further enhancing its ability to address the diverse challenges faced by emerging economies.
BRICS’ focus on fostering resilient supply chains and enhancing economic cooperation is particularly important in the current global context. With supply chains severely disrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent geopolitical tensions, the group’s emphasis on this issue aligns with India’s efforts to strengthen its own supply chains and promote economic resilience. Additionally, BRICS offers an important platform for member countries to share knowledge and collaborate on innovations in areas like climate change and digital infrastructure.
PM Modi’s remarks underscore the strategic importance of BRICS for India’s foreign policy. The platform not only offers India an opportunity to engage with other major economies, but also provides a space for it to champion the causes of developing nations. As global dynamics shift, BRICS continues to evolve as a crucial player in the international system, and India’s leadership within the group will be instrumental in shaping its future.
India remains deeply committed to BRICS as a key multilateral platform for global dialogue and cooperation. PM Modi’s participation in the 16th BRICS summit in Kazan reaffirms India’s belief in the group’s potential to drive positive change on a global scale. Through bilateral meetings and multilateral discussions, India is poised to continue playing a vital role in BRICS, advocating for inclusive development, economic cooperation, and a more equitable world order. As the group grows with the inclusion of new members, its impact on global governance is set to expand, with India at the forefront of this transformation.
India and China Agree to Border Patrolling Arrangements to De-escalate Tensions
India and China have reached an understanding regarding patrolling along their disputed Himalayan border, a step aimed at reducing the rising tensions that have persisted for several years. This region has seen violent clashes in the past, including deadly confrontations that escalated in recent years. India’s top diplomat, Vikram Misri, made the announcement on Monday, stating that both countries have agreed on “disengagement and resolution of issues in these [border] areas that had arisen in 2020.”
Misri’s statement refers to the tensions stemming from the deadly Galwan Valley clashes, which occurred in 2020. This confrontation marked the first fatal conflict between Indian and Chinese forces since 1975, leading to significant casualties on both sides. The border clashes have severely strained the relations between the two neighboring nations, and efforts to resolve the issues have been ongoing since then.
In his remarks, Misri highlighted, “An agreement has been arrived at on patrolling arrangements along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the India-China border areas, leading to disengagement and a resolution of the issues that had arisen in these areas in 2020.” This announcement comes as a significant breakthrough after several rounds of discussions between both nations’ diplomats and military leaders, although details of the specific disengagement process remain unclear.
Despite the announcement, Misri did not elaborate on the scope of the disengagement process, nor did he specify whether it would cover all the conflict zones along the contested border. The Indian foreign secretary’s statement came just a day before Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s scheduled visit to Russia for a BRICS summit. This event includes representatives from Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. However, Misri did not confirm whether a separate bilateral meeting between Prime Minister Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping would take place on the sidelines of the summit.
Misri’s remarks mark a critical moment for India-China relations since the Galwan clashes, a brutal hand-to-hand conflict that took place in the summer of 2020. During this incident, soldiers from both sides engaged in a violent struggle using clubs and sticks, as per a 1996 agreement that prohibited the use of firearms and explosives near the disputed border. The deadly brawl resulted in casualties on both sides, further straining already tense relations.
The Galwan Valley confrontation shocked many, as the border between the two nuclear-armed neighbors had not witnessed such a violent episode in decades. Misri’s latest statement may signal progress in cooling tensions, but the broader challenges along the border remain unresolved. The incident triggered a series of military and diplomatic talks over the following years, but these discussions had, until now, failed to yield a substantial breakthrough.
In addition to the Galwan clashes, further skirmishes have taken place along the India-China border. Troops from both countries clashed again in the northern Sikkim region in 2021, and another confrontation occurred in the Tawang sector of the border in 2022. These incidents, along with the Galwan conflict, underscore the ongoing volatility along the Himalayan frontier.
The India-China border dispute has cast a long and persistent shadow over the bilateral relationship between the two countries. Their hostilities date back decades, most notably to the 1962 Sino-Indian War, in which India suffered a heavy defeat. The war, which was fought over the same disputed border, left deep scars that continue to shape India’s approach to China.
Economic relations between the two Asian giants have also taken a hit due to the ongoing border tensions. While China and India are two of the world’s largest economies, their border disputes have hindered cooperation and stunted potential business opportunities. Trade relations have suffered, as both countries have prioritized security concerns over expanding economic ties.
The root cause of the ongoing tension lies in the undefined nature of the 3,440-kilometer (2,100-mile) border between India and China. The Line of Actual Control, or LAC, is a poorly demarcated boundary that stretches across difficult terrain, including rivers, lakes, and snow-covered mountains. This dynamic and shifting frontier often leads to soldiers from both sides coming into direct contact with each other at various points, which, in turn, sparks confrontations.
In recent years, both India and China have embarked on ambitious infrastructure projects along their respective sides of the border. The two nations have been competing to build roads, military outposts, and other facilities, leading to further tensions. Each side views the other’s infrastructure development as a potential threat, contributing to a cycle of suspicion and escalation.
The clashes in the Galwan Valley and other border areas have been the most significant flashpoints between India and China in recent memory. The hand-to-hand combat in Galwan was particularly unusual because of the absence of firearms. Both countries had agreed in 1996 to refrain from using guns and explosives in the sensitive border region, hoping to reduce the risk of an all-out war. However, the lack of conventional weapons did not prevent the deadly outcome of the 2020 skirmish, and the situation has remained tense ever since.
The disengagement agreement announced by Misri represents a possible turning point in the fraught relationship between India and China, though the path to a lasting peace remains uncertain. Both countries have demonstrated a willingness to engage in dialogue, but the deep-rooted issues along the border, including territorial claims and the infrastructure race, are unlikely to be resolved quickly.
For decades, India and China have been locked in a complex and contentious relationship, with the unresolved border dispute being one of the most critical factors shaping their interactions. Both nations have risen as regional powers in Asia, and their ability to manage this dispute will have a significant impact not only on their bilateral relations but also on the broader geopolitical landscape in the region.
The latest agreement on patrolling arrangements between India and China offers hope for de-escalation and the resolution of some of the most pressing issues along the Line of Actual Control. However, without further clarity on the specifics of the disengagement process and whether it covers all conflict areas, it is too early to predict the long-term success of these efforts. As both countries continue to engage in talks, the broader strategic and territorial challenges will remain at the forefront of India-China relations for the foreseeable future.
India Strengthens Nuclear Deterrence with Launch of Fourth SSBN Submarine Amid Diplomatic Tensions
Amid escalating tensions with Canada, India has taken a significant step to bolster its nuclear deterrence by quietly launching its fourth nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) this week. The submarine, constructed at the Ship Building Center (SBC) in Visakhapatnam, further enhances India’s defense capabilities against its regional adversaries, particularly in the Indo-Pacific.
India’s submarine fleet is steadily growing, with the country commissioning its second SSBN, INS Arighaat, on August 29, 2024. This milestone was marked by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. The third SSBN in the series, INS Aridhaman, is scheduled to be commissioned next year. As India moves ahead with its naval defense strategy, the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) has also approved plans for the Indian Navy to construct two additional nuclear-powered attack submarines, further strengthening its deterrence capabilities in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific region.
Although the Indian government, particularly under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has maintained a tight-lipped approach regarding the country’s nuclear deterrence strategies, the launch of the fourth SSBN, code-named S4*, took place on October 16, 2024. This came a day after the inauguration of a Very Low Frequency Naval Station by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh in the Damagundam forest area of Telangana’s Vikarabad district. The station is critical for communication, command, and control of the Indian Navy’s strategic assets, reflecting India’s continuing focus on enhancing its maritime defense infrastructure.
The newly launched S4* submarine features about 75% indigenous content, a testament to India’s growing self-reliance in defense manufacturing. The SSBN is equipped with the K-4 ballistic missile system, which has a range of 3,500 kilometers. These missiles are fired using vertical launch systems, adding a significant strategic advantage. Earlier SSBN models, such as the INS Arihant, carried the shorter-range K-15 nuclear missiles, which had a range of only 750 kilometers. The successors to the Arihant, however, represent significant upgrades in terms of missile capacity and overall capabilities, ensuring they carry only K-4 ballistic missiles.
The SSBN’s operational endurance is virtually unlimited due to its nuclear power, with constraints only imposed by food supplies, crew fatigue, and maintenance. Currently, both INS Arihant and INS Arighaat are on deep-sea patrols, enhancing India’s nuclear deterrence capabilities. In a further boost to the Indian Navy’s nuclear assets, a Russian Akula-class nuclear-powered attack submarine is expected to join the fleet in 2028, on lease from Russia.
India’s strategic planners have adhered to a specific naming convention for its SSBN fleet. The first leased nuclear submarine, INS Chakra, was designated S1. This led to the first indigenous SSBN, INS Arihant, being named S2, followed by INS Arighaat as S3, and INS Aridhaman as S4. The newly launched SSBN, S4*, marks the final vessel in the current class of submarines, though a formal name has yet to be assigned. Future SSBNs from India are anticipated to be even more advanced, with double the displacement of the Arihant class at 6,000 tons and capable of carrying nuclear missiles with ranges exceeding 5,000 kilometers.
The Modi government’s emphasis on enhancing sea-based deterrence stems from the belief that submarine-based assets are crucial in countering potential threats from China and other adversaries. One of the primary concerns driving this focus is the vulnerability of aircraft carriers to long-range missiles such as China’s Dong Feng-21 and Dong Feng-26, which are capable of targeting large, visible assets like aircraft carriers. According to defense analysts, in worst-case scenarios, aircraft carriers could become easy targets for these long-range missiles. Consequently, the government has prioritized the construction of nuclear attack and ballistic missile submarines over a third aircraft carrier for the Indian Navy.
To supplement its nuclear submarine fleet, India has also stepped up its conventional submarine capabilities. By December 2024, India is expected to commission the sixth diesel-powered attack submarine of the Kalvari class, INS Vagsheer. This addition will further bolster the Navy’s conventional defense capabilities, complementing the strategic role played by its nuclear-powered vessels.
Looking ahead, India is set to approve the construction of three more advanced diesel attack submarines at Mazagon Dockyards, in collaboration with the French Naval Group. These submarines will add further depth to India’s conventional submarine fleet, ensuring the Navy is well-prepared for potential conflicts in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). In recent years, China’s presence in the IOR has grown, with approximately 10 to 11 Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warships operating in the region each month since 2023. Moreover, China’s carrier-based long-range patrols are expected to begin by 2025-2026, underscoring the need for India to strengthen its maritime defense posture.
With China’s increased naval activity, India’s focus on submarines — both nuclear and conventional — positions it to maintain a strong defensive and offensive capability in the region. By prioritizing sea-based deterrence, particularly with its submarine fleet, India aims to safeguard its maritime interests and ensure dominance in the IOR. The role of strategic submarines in India’s naval defense strategy is set to become even more critical as the country continues to modernize and expand its fleet.
India’s decision to launch its fourth SSBN during a time of heightened diplomatic tensions with Canada underscores the country’s commitment to reinforcing its national security and nuclear deterrence capabilities. With the commissioning of multiple SSBNs and the construction of additional nuclear attack submarines, India is positioning itself as a formidable maritime power, ready to counter threats in the Indo-Pacific and beyond. The addition of the S4* submarine to its fleet marks a significant milestone in this journey, highlighting the country’s growing self-sufficiency in defense manufacturing and its strategic focus on submarines over traditional surface fleets like aircraft carriers.
H1B Visa Issue No Longer a Concern: Piyush Goyal Declares Shift in Focus
Union Minister of Commerce and Industry, Piyush Goyal, announced that the H1B visa issue has been resolved and is no longer a topic of international concern. Speaking at Vanijya Bhavan in New Delhi, Goyal stated that this matter would no longer dominate discussions in international talks, signaling a significant shift in the focus of India’s diplomatic and economic relations. The minister emphasized that India would now concentrate on other key areas of economic and strategic partnerships instead of the long-debated H1B visa issue.
Minister Goyal’s declaration came after his recent two-day visit to the United States, where he held meetings in New York with CEOs of leading companies. During these discussions, the focus was on reforms introduced by the Modi government aimed at attracting foreign investments in various sectors, particularly pharmaceuticals and diamonds. Goyal highlighted these reforms as a major factor in drawing increased interest from global corporations, particularly from the U.S. This visit marked a continued effort by India to strengthen its economic ties with the U.S., while the H1B visa issue, which had been a prominent topic for many years, was notably absent from the agenda.
The H1B visa program has long been a critical avenue for U.S. companies to hire foreign professionals, particularly in specialized fields requiring advanced education or knowledge. The visa allows employers to hire workers for positions that require theoretical and practical expertise in specialized areas. To qualify for the H1B visa, workers typically need at least a bachelor’s degree or equivalent qualifications in the relevant field.
According to a report published by Intead and the job search platform F1 Hire, titled “Connecting Dots: How International Students Are Finding US Jobs,” certain states in the U.S. have the highest concentration of H1B visa applicants per employer sponsor. The report found that Washington, North Carolina, Texas, and Michigan lead in the number of H1B applications, with companies in these states heavily relying on the program to source foreign talent. The report also shed light on the growing diversity of foreign workers in the U.S. While Indian nationals continue to dominate the H1B visa landscape, representing 28% of the applicants, the study also highlighted a rise in applicants from countries like Brazil and the Philippines, particularly those seeking permanent labor certification (PERM).
The PERM process, overseen by the U.S. Department of Labor, is a crucial mechanism through which employers can sponsor foreign workers for permanent positions in the U.S. Notably, nine out of the top ten companies sponsoring PERM applications in 2023 were in the technology sector. This underscores the critical role of foreign talent in driving innovation and growth in the tech industry. PERM certification has become an increasingly popular route for foreign workers, as it provides a pathway to long-term employment and residency in the U.S.
However, the H1B visa program has also been the subject of scrutiny and legal challenges in recent years. A U.S. district court recently ruled against Cognizant Technology Solutions, one of the largest users of the H1B program, in a discrimination lawsuit. The court found that Cognizant had engaged in discriminatory practices against non-Indian employees, awarding punitive damages as a result. The lawsuit also accused the company of misusing the H1B visa process to favor Indian workers over other nationalities. The ruling highlights ongoing concerns about the equitable use of the visa program, particularly in industries like information technology, where a large proportion of H1B visas are granted to Indian nationals.
In response to the growing demand for skilled labor, U.S. lawmakers have introduced new legislative measures to retain international talent, particularly in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). In July 2023, Congressman Shri Thanedar, an Indian-American representing Michigan’s 13th Congressional District, introduced the “Keep STEM Graduates in America Act.” This legislation is aimed at making it easier for international STEM students to stay in the U.S. after completing their studies. The bill seeks to streamline the visa application process for STEM graduates, encouraging them to contribute to the U.S. economy by filling critical jobs in the science and tech sectors.
The Keep STEM Graduates in America Act represents a broader effort to reform the U.S. visa system, with a particular focus on addressing the needs of highly skilled international students. STEM fields are among the most popular areas of study for foreign students in U.S. universities, and the proposed legislation seeks to make it easier for these graduates to remain in the U.S. after completing their education. By simplifying the visa process, the bill aims to boost H1B visa issuances for STEM graduates, ensuring that the U.S. retains top talent in key industries.
In addition to legislative changes, the U.S. government has also implemented new rules governing the H1B visa program. Starting from April 1, 2024, the U.S. will introduce an increased visa fee for H1B applicants. This move is part of a broader effort to reform the visa system and address concerns about the fairness and efficiency of the H1B program. The fee hike is expected to have a significant impact on companies that rely heavily on the visa to hire foreign workers, particularly in sectors like technology and healthcare.
Meanwhile, Indian investors are increasingly turning to alternative visa options to secure long-term residency in the U.S. One such option is the EB5 visa program, which has seen a surge in applications from India in recent years. The EB5 program offers a pathway to permanent residency in the U.S. for foreign investors who make significant contributions to the U.S. economy by creating at least 10 permanent jobs. According to recent data, the number of EB5 visa applications from India has skyrocketed, rising from approximately 750 applications in 2019 to over 10,000 applications in 2022.
The EB5 visa has become an attractive alternative for Indian nationals who may face challenges in securing H1B visas or student visas. By investing in the U.S. economy, applicants can gain a pathway to permanent residency, bypassing the competitive and often restrictive H1B visa process. This trend reflects a growing interest among Indian investors in securing long-term residency in the U.S. through investment-based immigration programs.
Piyush Goyal’s remarks mark a pivotal moment in India’s approach to international relations, as the H1B visa issue is now considered resolved. With the focus shifting to economic and strategic partnerships, both the U.S. and India are exploring new avenues for collaboration. As the U.S. introduces reforms to its visa system and India’s investors increasingly turn to programs like the EB5 visa, the landscape of U.S.-India relations is evolving, with both nations seeking to strengthen their economic ties in the years to come.
AAPI’s 18th Global Healthcare Summit Focusses on Prevention Strategies for Cancer and Heart Attacks, Role of Lifestyle Changes, and the Integration of Technology into Healthcare
(New Delhi, India: October 21st, 2024) The growing influence of physicians of Indian heritage is evident, as they are increasingly recognized and they hold critical positions in healthcare, academic, research, and administration across the United States. Their hard work, dedication, compassion, and skills have carved out an enviable niche in the American medical community.
In India, with a rise in population, there is an urgent need to create awareness and establish effective systems on the need for ways to prevent diseases and help India’s 1.4 Billion people live healthier life.
It’s in this context, the AAPI Global Healthcare Summit (GHS 2024) from October 19-20, 2024 in New Delhi, India, organized by the Association of American Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) in collaboration with and participation from some of the world’s most well-known physicians, and industry leaders becomes very critical and significant.
Dozens of Physician leaders of Indian origin came together in response to this call to contribute to the wellbeing of their fellow countrymen in India by participating at the 18th edition of the Global Healthcare Summit 2024 at the Le Meridien Hotel at the heart of New Delhi, India.
“It is with great pride and excitement that I welcome you all to the 18th AAPI Global Healthcare Summit in New Delhi,” Dr. Satheesh Kathula, President of The American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI), in his inaugural address. “This year we gather under the important and timely theme of preventing cancer and heart attacks through lifestyle modifications and technology in a world where chronic diseases like cancer and cardiovascular illnesses continue to pose significant health threats, where corrective mission has never been more urgent.”
“We have chosen New Delhi for the Global Healthcare Summit 2024, because, this is where all the actions are taking place, including policy discussions and legislation to address the needs of the nation,” said Dr. Kathula.
“AAPI has been engaged in harnessing the power of Indian Diaspora to bring the most innovative, efficient, cost-effective healthcare and preventable solutions to India, Dr. Kathula said. “This international health care summit is a progressive transformation from the first Indo-US Healthcare Summit launched by AAPI USA in 2007. GHS 2024 will focus on Prevention Strategies for Cancer and Heart Attacks, Role of Lifestyle Changes, and Integration of Technology in Healthcare,” said Dr. Satheesh Kathula, President of AAPI.
Honorable Health Minister of India, Shri Jagat Prakash Nadda delivered via video an address on national prevention strategies. Dr. Nadda acknowledged that the world is staring at two most critical health challenges, cancer and cardiac diseases. Dr. Nadda said. “With aging population, changes in lifestyle and increasing urbanization, the incidence of cancer and cardiovascular diseases, particularly heart attacks, are on the rise.”
Dr. Nadda said, “I’m happy to share that through the national program for prevention and control of cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and stroke program, we are providing a framework for individuals across the country who access health education screenings and support services aimed at prevention and early detection. It is well known that the lifestyle modification is the key pillar in the prevention of ailments like cancer and cardiac diseases. Foundation of prevention of these diseases lies in adopting healthier lifestyles, like regular exercise, a balanced diet, and shunning tobacco and alcohol, Dr. Nadda told the AAPI delegates.
“We all know that AAPI has been playing a key role in the exchange of experience and knowledge in the field of medicine between India and the US today,” Dr. Nadda said. “Together, we can harness the power of innovation and lifestyle modification to safety, frequently, reduce the burden of cancer and heart diseases, not only in India but across the globe. I thank AAPI for organizing the Global Healthcare Summit in India, wishing the summit a grand success.”
The CME sessions by eminent physicians from India and abroad offered a unique perspectives on Prevention Strategies for Cancer and Heart Attacks, Role of Lifestyle Changes, and the Integration of Technology into Healthcare Describing the message and theme for the Summit,
“This this year marks a significant milestone in the history of AAPI, as we proudly introduce the Fellowship of AAPI (FAAPI), said Dr. Kathula. “This prestigious recognition on is not only doctors, but also healthcare administrators who have made substantial contributions in their respective fields. In India, for the inaugural year, we are delighted to announce that three eminent physicians and administrators have been selected as eligible recipients. Dr. Rakesh Sharma, Dr. Bhasnji Kundaria, and Dr. Raman Kumar were honored by AAPI with this prestigious award.
This international healthcare summit is a progressive transformation from the first Indo-US Healthcare Summit launched by AAPI in 2007. “Providing a forum for innovative opportunities for learning, networking and giving back to our motherland that have now enabled us to plan ahead and prepare for an outstanding event that will be over 300 very prominent and talented physicians and surgeons from abroad, in addition to the hundreds of physicians from India, who are very passionate about serving their homeland, mother India,” Dr. Sunil Kaza, Chair of AAPI BOT said.
According to Dr. Anjali Gulati, Convener of GHS 2024, “AAPI rapidly expands its vision for India – in educational research, clinical programs, global outreach and a tie-up with the Indian Government on healthcare programs. GHS 2024 offered a unique forum for physicians of Indian origin to come together, share their knowledge and expertise in their respective medical fields with their fellow physicians from around the world, and to learn from one another.”
For the first time ever, AAPI delegates had an opportunity to visit to the Rashtrapati Bhavan, the Presidential Palace of India in New Delhi. During this unique guided tour of the historic premises of India’s President.
Also, the AAPI delegates had an opportunity to visit and pray at the world famous Swaminarayan Akshardham at New Delhi with an informative and inspiring journey through an ancient culture’s glorious art, values and contributions for the progress, happiness and harmony of all humans.
Fashion Show and live entertainment by Preeti Bhalla took the AAPI delegates to the nostalgic memories of the 1960s and 70s. The cuisine added special flavor to the Summit.
A spontaneous session on Medical Education Abroad and how to navigate the system and explore opportunities to study and work in the United States by AAPI leadership was much appreciated by the hundreds of Medical students and Fellows who had come to be part of the GHS 2024.
Poster and Research Contest by over 70 Medical students and Fellows from across the nation added value to the event with the new generation of Indian Medical students showcasing their talents, skills and commitment to medical education.
Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, President-Elect of AAPI says, “AAPI has a mandate to help disseminate our medical knowledge, our expertise and technological advances to the rest of the world, and to India in particular. Headquartered in Chicago, AAPI has come to be recognized as a strong voice in the healthcare legislation and policy arena.”
“With the changing trends and statistics in healthcare, both in India and US, we are refocusing our mission and vision of GHS 2024, AAPI would like to make a positive meaningful impact on the healthcare in India,” Dr. Kathula said.
“In our quest to fulfill the mission of AAPI, we are proud to share best practice and experiences from leading experts in the world and develop actionable plans for launching demonstration projects that enable access to affordable and quality healthcare for all people. Thank you for your participation and for being part of this movement for healthier world, let’s continue to work together, leveraging both the power of Prevention and the promise of technology to Save Lives,” Dr. Kathula added.
Dr. Kathula expressed his appreciation for the collaboration and support by Dr. Sunil Karza, Chair AAPI BOT, Dr. Lokesh Edara, past BOT Chair of AAPI, Dr. Anjali Gulati, GHS Convener, Dr. Manmeet Ahluwalia, Dr. Brahma SDharma, Dr. Amit Govil and Dr. Hetal Gor. He called out Dr. Shubham Anand, the Organizing Secretary of GHS 2024 and his dedicated team from India for their generous support and taking this opportunity to make GHS a memorable event for all. Dr. Soumya Neravetla eloquently emceed the Summit.
Amit Chakrabarty, President-Elect of AAPI said, the current President of India, Smt. Draupadi Murmu suggested to have AAPI’s collaboration in having a TB Free Tribal India, and this initiative will be led by Dr. Manoj Jain. The Diabetes related efforts are being led by Dr. Smitha Joshi. The Ayurveda Consortium is being led by Dr. Amit Shah, Dr. Artin Prasad, and Dr. Dilip Sarkar. Dr. Chakrabarty invited AAPI members to participate at the 19th edition of AAPI’s Global Healthcare Summit with focus on Tuberculosis, Ayurveda, and Diabetes, which will be held in Bhubaneshwar, Orissa from January 9-11, 2026.
For more information on Global Health Summit 2024, please visit https://aapisummit.org
J&K Cabinet Passes Resolution to Restore Statehood, Omar Abdullah Set to Meet PM
The Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) Cabinet has passed a resolution urging the Union Government to restore statehood to the region. The resolution, backed by the entire Cabinet, has received the necessary clearance from Lieutenant Governor (L-G) Manoj Sinha. With this approval, Chief Minister Omar Abdullah is expected to visit New Delhi soon to meet with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and other Union Ministers to press the issue.
On Saturday, L-G Sinha also administered the oath of office to National Conference leader Mubarak Gul as the pro-tem Speaker of the J&K Legislative Assembly. The oath ceremony took place at Raj Bhawan, with several prominent figures in attendance, including Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, Deputy Chief Minister Surinder Choudhary, Cabinet ministers, Chief Secretary Atal Dulloo, and the Chief Minister’s Advisor, Nasir Aslam Wani.
Mubarak Gul, who won the recent Assembly elections from the Eidgah constituency in Srinagar, will have the important responsibility of administering the oath to the newly-elected Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) on October 21. This marks a significant step in the ongoing political process in Jammu and Kashmir after the recent elections.
The resolution to restore statehood to Jammu and Kashmir was the top agenda item in the J&K Cabinet meeting chaired by Omar Abdullah on Thursday. The Cabinet unanimously passed the resolution, signaling a strong push for the restoration of statehood “in its original form.” After the Cabinet’s approval, the resolution was sent to L-G Sinha for his endorsement, as required under the transaction of business rules. According to these rules, all proposals for discussion by the Cabinet must be sent to the L-G at least two days before the meeting.
In a government statement issued on Saturday, the restoration of statehood was described as the beginning of a “healing process” for the people of Jammu and Kashmir. “The restoration of statehood will be a beginning of a healing process, reclaiming the constitutional rights and protecting identity of people of Jammu and Kashmir,” the statement said.
The J&K Cabinet also empowered Chief Minister Omar Abdullah to take up the matter of statehood restoration with the Prime Minister and the Union Government. This move aligns with the new government’s policy focus on protecting the unique identity and constitutional rights of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. “Protection of J&K’s unique identity and constitutional rights of people remains the cornerstone of the newly elected government’s policy,” the government added in its statement.
Despite the significant step taken by the government in pushing for statehood, the Omar Abdullah administration has faced criticism from opposition parties for focusing on statehood rather than advocating for the revocation of Article 370, which was revoked by the Indian government in 2019. Some opposition members have questioned why the statehood resolution was routed through the Cabinet rather than tackling the issue of Article 370 directly.
In response to these criticisms, government officials clarified that the matters of statehood and Article 370 fall under different jurisdictions. According to sources, “Article 370 is the purview of the legislature while statehood is the purview of the government. Hence, the statehood resolution has come first.” Chief Minister Omar Abdullah reiterated this point in a tweet on the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, on Saturday morning, making it clear that the restoration of statehood is the first step in addressing the broader political situation in J&K.
Additionally, the J&K Cabinet made an important decision regarding the scheduling of the Legislative Assembly’s next session. It was decided that the Assembly will be summoned in Srinagar on November 4. The Cabinet also advised the Lieutenant Governor to address the Legislative Assembly at the start of this session, as is customary. The draft address for the L-G’s speech to the Assembly was presented to the Council of Ministers, who agreed that it would require further consideration and discussion before being finalized.
Mubarak Gul’s new role as pro-tem Speaker and his responsibility in swearing in the newly elected MLAs signifies another important development in the region’s political timeline. Gul, a prominent leader in the National Conference party, will oversee the ceremonial beginning of the Assembly’s work, marking a new phase in the political activities of Jammu and Kashmir post-election.
This move towards restoring statehood comes amid rising political expectations in the region following the elections, and it is a significant political statement from the newly elected government. The resolution signals the Abdullah administration’s intention to restore Jammu and Kashmir’s autonomy, which had been downgraded to a Union Territory following the revocation of Article 370 in August 2019. While the revocation of Article 370 remains a contentious issue, the restoration of statehood is seen as a crucial first step in addressing the aspirations of the people in Jammu and Kashmir.
For Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and his government, the next steps will be crucial. The upcoming meeting with Prime Minister Modi and other senior members of the Union Government will be vital in determining the course of action for the restoration of statehood. The resolution reflects the collective will of the J&K Cabinet, and now the Abdullah government must navigate the complexities of national politics to see this resolution through.
As the political situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how the Union Government will respond to the statehood resolution. The restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir would be a significant shift in the region’s political status and could pave the way for further discussions on other pressing issues, including Article 370.
In the meantime, the focus will remain on the developments in Srinagar, where the newly elected MLAs are set to take their oaths and begin their legislative duties. The political landscape of Jammu and Kashmir continues to evolve, with the resolution for statehood standing as a testament to the region’s desire for greater autonomy and constitutional rights. Whether this resolution leads to tangible changes in the region’s status remains to be seen, but it is undoubtedly a crucial step in the ongoing efforts to address the complex political and constitutional issues surrounding Jammu and Kashmir.
This political process, marked by the push for statehood restoration and the ceremonial beginning of the new Assembly, symbolizes a new chapter for Jammu and Kashmir as it continues to seek its place within the broader framework of Indian democracy. The Abdullah government’s efforts will be closely watched, both within the region and across the country, as they seek to bring about lasting change for the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
Report Reveals Hindu American Foundation’s Ties to Far-Right Extremism
A recent report published by Political Research Associates (PRA) and the Savera: United Against Supremacy coalition exposes the Hindu American Foundation’s (HAF) connections to far-right groups and its role in promoting a divisive agenda. The report highlights HAF’s strategy of using civil rights language to disguise its alliances with Hindu supremacists and other far-right entities, raising concerns about its influence on Indian American communities and broader civil society in the U.S.
On October 16, 2024, PRA and the Savera coalition jointly released the report, “HAF Way to Supremacy: How the Hindu American Foundation Rebrands Bigotry as Minority Rights.” The findings outline how HAF has aligned itself with far-right actors, spreading harmful narratives such as Islamophobia and casteism within the Indian American community. The report suggests that HAF’s ultimate goal is to undermine solidarity among communities of color, steering Hindu Americans toward an increasingly multiracial far-right in the United States.
The document emphasizes that HAF’s agenda is based on a zero-sum approach to civil rights, where the rights of Hindu Americans are portrayed as being in opposition to other minority groups. “The civil rights and religious freedoms of Hindus are framed in opposition to, and at the expense of, those of other communities,” the report states. By attacking the extension of civil rights protections to caste-oppressed groups, spreading negative stereotypes about Muslims, and shielding the Indian government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi from international scrutiny, HAF has found common ground with other far-right elements.
Far from being a recent development, HAF’s far-right affiliations date back to its origins. The organization was founded by a younger generation of Hindutva activists who had previously been involved with overtly bigoted Hindu supremacist groups. HAF was designed to provide a more acceptable face for Hindutva ideology, enabling it to gain legitimacy in mainstream American discourse. However, its deep-rooted connections with extremist organizations like the Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh (HSS) and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America (VHP-A) have remained largely hidden from public view.
HAF has sought to exploit the general lack of understanding about Hindu nationalism and far-right Hindu movements in the Indian diaspora, positioning itself as a representative of Hindu American civil rights. This strategy allowed the organization to gain acceptance in American civil society, where it became involved in interfaith and multicultural coalitions. These groups welcomed HAF, assuming it represented the views of Hindu Americans. However, as its far-right associations have become more apparent, HAF has distanced itself from these inclusive spaces, focusing instead on exclusionary tactics and lobbying efforts. The report underscores that HAF’s growing influence poses a serious threat to the creation of a genuinely multiracial democracy in the U.S.
HAF’s Role in Far-Right Movements
The report highlights how HAF has consistently worked to propagate far-right ideology under the guise of defending Hindu rights. It details how HAF has blocked efforts to extend civil rights protections to caste-oppressed groups, thus maintaining the status quo of caste-based discrimination within the Hindu community. Furthermore, HAF has played a significant role in spreading Islamophobic narratives, positioning Hindus as victims in a supposed civilizational clash with Muslims, a view promoted by Hindu supremacists in India.
This alignment with far-right ideology is also evident in HAF’s attempts to shield India’s Modi-led government from international criticism. Modi’s government has faced widespread allegations of promoting policies that target religious minorities, particularly Muslims. HAF’s defense of these policies aligns it with the far-right globally, not just in the U.S., creating transnational connections between Hindu supremacists and other far-right movements.
Expert Reactions
Tarso Luís Ramos, Executive Director of Political Research Associates, noted that the report unveils the role HAF plays in promoting Hindutva in the U.S. under the banner of civil rights. “The Hindu supremacist movement is a dangerous and increasingly influential force within an emergent multiracial Far Right in the United States,” he said. Ramos further highlighted how HAF has capitalized on the lack of awareness about Hindu supremacism in America to present itself as a legitimate civil rights organization. “This report sets the record straight: HAF is a stalking horse for Hindutva and must be understood as an extension of the Indian Far Right,” Ramos added.
Sunita Viswanath, Cofounder and Executive Director of Hindus for Human Rights, emphasized the importance of the report in exposing the far-reaching impact of HAF’s activities. “With this report, our third on the Hindu supremacist ecosystem in the United States, we have presented the most comprehensive treatment of how diasporic far-right networks are also a key part of the authoritarian movement in the U.S. This report is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand what the far-right is shaping up to be,” she said. Viswanath’s statement underscores the report’s broader relevance to understanding the development of far-right alliances, particularly as they relate to minority communities.
Chaitanya Diwadkar, representing the Ambedkar King Study Circle, pointed out that HAF’s efforts to deny caste discrimination in the U.S. form part of its broader supremacist agenda. “The report clearly illustrates how HAF has facilitated hate-mongering and supremacist politics,” Diwadkar stated. He warned of the danger posed by Hindu supremacist movements to democracy, both in India and the U.S., emphasizing the need for immediate action to address the issue.
Rasheed Ahmed, Executive Director of the Indian American Muslim Council, provided additional insights into HAF’s involvement in xenophobic campaigns. He criticized HAF for rejecting protections for caste-oppressed groups and supporting efforts by the Modi government to target Sikh minorities. “Savera’s new report compiles evidence of what many South Asian and Muslim civil rights groups have known for a long time: that HAF rejects protections for caste-oppressed groups, aligns with a foreign regime’s efforts to target our Sikh siblings, and joins in the xenophobic demonization of Muslims,” Ahmed said. His remarks reflect the growing concerns of civil rights groups over HAF’s role in spreading hateful ideologies within Indian American communities.
A Call to Action
The report concludes by urging U.S. civil society to recognize the danger posed by HAF’s far-right connections. As the multiracial far-right continues to grow in the U.S., it is critical to understand how organizations like HAF contribute to this movement, using minority rights language as a cover for advancing supremacist goals. The authors argue that HAF’s far-right record must be confronted if a truly inclusive and multiracial democracy is to be built.
By exposing the depth of HAF’s alliances with Hindu supremacists and its broader impact on civil rights in the U.S., the report serves as a wake-up call for policymakers, activists, and civil society groups. The challenge lies in dismantling the deceptive narratives promoted by HAF and ensuring that the fight for civil rights includes all marginalized communities, particularly those affected by casteism, Islamophobia, and other forms of bigotry.
Clarification on Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) Card: Understanding the Rights, Regulations, and Recent Changes
In September, after concerns arose among Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholders about being potentially reclassified as ‘foreigners,’ the Ministry of External Affairs stepped in to address the issue. They clarified that no alterations had been made to OCI regulations. Despite this assurance, many individuals remained confused about the privileges, rights, and flexibility the OCI card offers to foreign nationals of Indian origin. Here’s a detailed breakdown of what the OCI card entails and what recent amendments mean for cardholders.
Overview of the OCI Card
Introduced in 2005, the OCI card is a scheme designed to allow people of Indian origin, who were citizens of India as of or after January 26, 1950, to register as Overseas Citizens of India. This initiative was initially proposed by Home Minister LK Advani, with the aim of creating a form of dual citizenship for the Indian diaspora. The primary intention behind the OCI card was to strengthen the bond between India and its expatriates while offering them a range of privileges.
One of the most significant benefits of the OCI card is the grant of a lifetime, multiple-entry visa to India. With this, OCI cardholders no longer have to go through the hassle of repeatedly applying for a visa to enter the country. Additionally, unlike other foreign nationals, OCI cardholders are exempt from registering with the local police, regardless of how long they stay in India. This privilege significantly simplifies travel and residency in India for the cardholders.
Reports suggest that currently, there are over 4.5 million registered OCI cardholders worldwide, with a considerable number residing in countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada.
The 2021 Amendments to OCI Regulations
In 2021, several changes were introduced to the rules governing OCI cardholders, which had a significant impact on travel and specific activities within India. One of the key modifications was that OCI cardholders, like foreign nationals, are now required to obtain special permission before entering certain protected areas within India. These regions include Jammu & Kashmir and Arunachal Pradesh, which have long been subject to special security considerations due to their sensitive geopolitical importance.
Moreover, the updated rules also specify that OCI cardholders must secure permits for engaging in certain activities within India. For instance, any work related to research, missionary activities, journalism, or travel to restricted areas requires prior approval. This means that while the OCI card provides several benefits, it also imposes some limitations, particularly concerning activities that require governmental oversight.
Additionally, the 2021 amendments aligned OCI cardholders and foreign nationals with the financial and economic rules set out in the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) of 2003. Prior to this, OCI cardholders enjoyed similar privileges as non-resident Indians (NRIs), particularly in terms of financial investments and education opportunities. However, with the new regulations, OCI holders are subject to stricter scrutiny, especially in sectors that are vital to India’s economic interests. This shift marked a notable change, bringing OCI cardholders under a more regulated framework, though they still retain certain key advantages.
Maintaining Flexibility for Foreign Nationals of Indian Origin
Despite these changes, the OCI card continues to offer considerable flexibility to foreign nationals of Indian origin. In fact, several regulatory updates introduced in 2007 and 2009 enhanced the rights and privileges available to OCI cardholders, eventually replacing the initial guidelines from 2005. These changes were designed to strike a balance between the rights enjoyed by OCI cardholders and those granted to NRIs. The goal was to ensure that while OCI cardholders did not have the same status as Indian citizens, they still retained sufficient privileges to maintain close ties with India.
An interesting feature of the OCI card is its extension to spouses of Indian citizens or other OCI cardholders. According to the regulations, after two years of marriage, foreign nationals who are married to Indian citizens or to OCI cardholders are eligible to apply for OCI status themselves. This provision offers greater flexibility to couples, allowing them to more easily manage travel and residency in India.
However, it’s worth noting that OCI status is not available to all foreign nationals of Indian origin. Specifically, individuals who have served in a foreign military are not eligible for OCI. This exclusion is in line with India’s security policies, as the government remains cautious about granting privileges to individuals with ties to foreign military establishments. Furthermore, those with ancestral connections to Pakistan or Bangladesh are also excluded from OCI eligibility. This particular restriction has been in place since the program’s inception and reflects the complex historical and political dynamics between India and these neighboring countries.
Conclusion
The OCI card offers a unique opportunity for individuals of Indian origin to maintain close connections with India while enjoying the privileges of foreign citizenship. Over the years, the scheme has been refined through various amendments aimed at striking a balance between the rights of OCI cardholders and the need for regulatory oversight. While recent changes have introduced certain restrictions on travel and specific activities, the card continues to provide significant advantages, particularly in terms of travel, residency, and investment opportunities in India.
As the number of OCI cardholders grows globally, the government’s ongoing commitment to refining and clarifying regulations will be crucial in ensuring that the program continues to serve the needs of the Indian diaspora. With millions of individuals benefiting from the scheme, it is clear that the OCI card plays a vital role in maintaining India’s relationship with its expatriate communities.
Despite occasional concerns or misunderstandings about the program, the core privileges of the OCI card remain intact. As stated by the Ministry of External Affairs, “There have been no changes to the OCI regulations,” affirming that the government remains committed to supporting the Indian diaspora. However, individuals who hold an OCI card must stay informed about any future regulatory changes to ensure they continue to benefit from the advantages the program offers.
Canada’s Allegations on Khalistani Leader’s Killing Were Based on Intelligence, Not Proof, Says PM Trudeau
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau revealed that the conversations held with India surrounding the killing of Khalistani activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar at the 2023 G-20 Summit in New Delhi were based on intelligence, not conclusive evidence. Trudeau shared these insights during a federal commission inquiry into foreign interference in Canada, reiterating his stance on India’s alleged involvement.
On Wednesday, October 16, 2024, Trudeau once again pointed fingers at India, asserting that the country was involved in Nijjar’s assassination. The decision to make such sensitive information public, according to him, was necessary to demonstrate to Canadian citizens that the government was taking their security seriously. “We wanted the public to know that we were taking action…” said Trudeau during the hearing. His statement came in the backdrop of continuing diplomatic tension between the two nations over the incident.
The murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a known Khalistani separatist, has been a contentious issue in India-Canada relations. The Canadian Prime Minister doubled down on his claim, stating that India’s alleged role in the assassination was a “massive mistake if India had done it.” He added, “My government had reasons to believe that India did it.” The inquiry, however, did not delve into any concrete evidence during this session, as the focus quickly shifted to other matters.
Addressing the fallout from the incident, Trudeau explained that the deterioration in diplomatic relations between India and Canada was never the desired outcome. He maintained that Canada’s official stance continues to uphold India’s territorial integrity, emphasizing the country’s “One India” policy. “There are a number of people in Canada who argue otherwise,” Trudeau acknowledged, likely referring to pro-Khalistan groups, “but that does not make it our policy. It is also not something that is illegal in Canada.”
However, he pointed out that India’s reaction to these allegations was disappointing. “India’s response when the concerns were taken up with it was to attack Canada, undermine our government, and the integrity of our democracy,” he said. These remarks shed light on how strained the diplomatic ties between the two nations have become in the aftermath of the Nijjar case.
According to Trudeau, the intelligence-gathering efforts regarding Nijjar’s killing were spurred by concerns raised by South Asian Members of Parliament (MPs) in Canada. The inquiries from these MPs prompted his government to seek more clarity on the potential involvement of foreign actors in Nijjar’s murder.
As soon as Canada gathered intelligence hinting at Indian involvement, Trudeau stated that they immediately reached out to Indian security agencies. “Our immediate response was to communicate with Indian security agencies…” Trudeau emphasized. He further explained that Canada’s initial aim was to ensure that the incident would not destroy bilateral relations. “At the G-20 summit… we did not want to make it uncomfortable for India,” he said, adding that he directly discussed the matter with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the summit.
Despite these attempts at communication, India has remained steadfast in denying the allegations. Additionally, India refused to waive diplomatic immunity for its officials implicated by the Canadian government. Addressing this refusal, Trudeau remarked that it wasn’t unexpected. “It was not surprising that India refused to waive diplomatic immunity for its officials,” he said, adding that even Canada would likely take the same stance if the roles were reversed.
The diplomatic fallout from this incident has continued to unfold, with both nations maintaining hardened stances. On Thursday, October 17, 2024, a spokesperson from India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Randhir Jaiswal, criticized Trudeau’s comments and reiterated that no evidence had been provided by Canada to back up these serious allegations.
“What we have heard today only confirms what we have been saying consistently all along – Canada has presented us no evidence whatsoever in support of the serious allegations that it has chosen to level against India and Indian diplomats,” said Jaiswal in his response. He placed the blame for the worsening relations squarely on Trudeau’s shoulders. “The responsibility for the damage that this cavalier behaviour has caused to India-Canada relations lies with Prime Minister Trudeau alone.”
Jaiswal’s statement reflects India’s ongoing frustration with the allegations and Canada’s handling of the situation. From India’s perspective, Trudeau’s public accusations have severely damaged what was once a more cooperative and friendly diplomatic relationship between the two nations. The absence of concrete evidence to substantiate these allegations has only deepened India’s discontent.
As tensions persist, the fallout from this case has reverberated beyond the halls of diplomacy. In Canada, the incident has raised concerns about the influence of foreign governments on its political processes, a topic that has increasingly come under scrutiny in recent years. The federal commission inquiry into foreign interference, which provided the platform for Trudeau’s recent testimony, has been tasked with investigating such matters, including the alleged role of India in the Nijjar killing.
Despite the diplomatic deadlock, Trudeau maintained that his government’s actions were necessary to ensure the safety and security of Canadian citizens. “We wanted the public to know that we were taking action…” he reiterated during the commission hearing, defending his administration’s decision to go public with the information, even though it was based on intelligence rather than hard evidence.
Looking ahead, it remains unclear how or if the diplomatic rift between India and Canada can be healed. The Nijjar case has clearly cast a long shadow over the future of India-Canada relations, and with both sides standing firm on their respective positions, a swift resolution seems unlikely.
While Trudeau continues to assert that Canada’s allegations were made in the interest of national security, India remains adamant that it had no involvement in the killing. The accusations have left a significant diplomatic scar, and unless new evidence or diplomatic breakthroughs emerge, the current state of tension between the two countries seems set to endure.
Omar Abdullah Sworn in as Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir with Surinder Kumar Choudhary as Deputy Chief Minister
On Wednesday, Omar Abdullah, the vice-president of the National Conference (NC), was officially sworn in as the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, with Surinder Kumar Choudhary, representing the Jammu region, taking the oath as Deputy Chief Minister. The ceremony took place in Srinagar, presided over by Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha.
Accompanying Mr. Abdullah were five legislators, consisting of three from the Jammu region and two from the Kashmir Valley, who also took their oaths as Ministers. Mr. Choudhary earned his position by defeating BJP leader Ravinder Raina in the Nowshera constituency of Jammu. Abdullah remarked that the structure of the Council of Ministers was “meant to convey a message” to the Jammu region, which saw the BJP win 29 out of 43 seats in the recent elections.
In his address, Mr. Abdullah stated, “I fulfilled the promise of giving representation to all the regions equally. We made Deputy Chief Minister from Jammu so that they will feel they are equally part of the government. There are three more ministries that will be filled soon. Our endeavour will be to walk together.”
Among those who were sworn in as Ministers were Satish Sharma from Jammu’s Chamb constituency, Sakina Yatoo from south Kashmir’s D.H. Pora constituency, Javid Dar from north Kashmir’s Rafiabad constituency, Mr. Choudhary from Jammu’s Nowshera constituency, and Javid Rana from Jammu’s Mendhar constituency. NC president Farooq Abdullah expressed his optimism about the government’s intentions, stating, “The government will treat both the regions equally and will also end the suffering of people.”
This marks Mr. Abdullah’s second term as Chief Minister, having previously served in the role starting in 2009. He has the distinction of being the first Chief Minister of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir after the Central government revoked the region’s special status in 2019 and conferred greater powers to the Lieutenant Governor.
Addressing the challenges ahead, Mr. Abdullah noted, “I was the last Chief Minister to serve a full six-year term. Now I will be the first Chief Minister of the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir. I am happy about the last distinction of serving six years. Being a Chief Minister of a Union Territory is a different matter altogether. It has its own challenges. I hope that the status of a Union Territory is a temporary one,” he stated prior to the swearing-in ceremony.
After the ceremony, Mr. Abdullah received a guard of honour at the Civil Secretariat in Srinagar and conducted his initial meeting with senior officials. In his first directive, he instructed the Director General of Police (DGP) to avoid creating a “green corridor” or causing traffic disruptions during his movements. “I have instructed him [the DGP] to minimise public inconvenience and the use of sirens is to be minimal. The use of any stick waving or aggressive gestures is to be totally avoided,” Mr. Abdullah emphasized, urging his fellow Cabinet Ministers to adopt a similar mindset.
In the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, there are only ten ministerial positions available, including the Chief Minister’s role. Notably, none of the six Congress legislators took their oaths, even though they are part of the coalition. Ghulam Ahmad Mir, the leader of the Congress Legislature Party, stated, “None of the elected members took oath before the Lieutenant Governor. It is a mark of our protest against Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not restoring statehood.”
Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge reiterated the party’s commitment to statehood, stating that “statehood remains its first priority.”
The swearing-in ceremony was attended by several leaders from the INDIA bloc, including prominent Congress figures such as Rahul Gandhi, Mallikarjun Kharge, and Priyanka Vadra. The event also saw participation from other political leaders, including former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav of the Samajwadi Party, CPI(M) leaders Prakash Karat and D. Raja, and Members of Parliament Kanimozhi and Supriya Sule. Former Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti and MP Sheikh Rashid were also present at the event.
BJP leader Ravinder Raina extended his congratulations to Mr. Abdullah, expressing hope that the new government would work towards “peace and progress.” He added, “I am confident they will further strengthen peace and tranquillity of past 10 years.”
It is noteworthy that none of the 29 BJP legislators attended the swearing-in ceremony in Srinagar.
Workers at Samsung Factory in Tamil Nadu End Strike After Month-Long Protest
Workers at Samsung Electronics’ factory in Tamil Nadu, India, have ended a labor strike that lasted over a month, marking one of the largest strikes the South Korean tech giant has faced in recent years. The strike, which involved around 1,500 workers in Chennai, was held to demand better wages, improved working conditions, and the recognition of a newly formed union.
According to labor activist E Muthukumar, who supported the workers during the strike, while Samsung has yet to formally recognize the union, the company has agreed to address the workers’ other demands. Muthukumar told the BBC, “We have decided to call off the protest as the Samsung management has decided to engage with workers on all key demands like higher wages, medical insurance, and better facilities.”
This protest has gained attention, as it had the potential to affect Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s efforts to position India as an alternative to China for global manufacturing. Samsung’s large presence in the Indian market makes it a significant player in Modi’s plans for India to become a global manufacturing hub. The month-long strike raised concerns about potential disruptions to this vision.
The Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU), a politically backed national labor union that led the protests, announced on Wednesday that the strike had been called off following a meeting between the workers and Samsung representatives. “During the meeting, it was decided that the workers would return to their jobs on Thursday,” Muthukumar explained, adding that while the issue of registering the new union, the Samsung India Labour Welfare Union (SILWU), is still pending in court, other critical issues had been addressed. “So those discussions will continue,” he said.
One of the major points of contention in the strike was the formal recognition of the union by Samsung. Workers argued that without official recognition, it would be difficult to negotiate fair wages and working hours. Muthukumar confirmed that although Samsung had not recognized the union, the company had agreed to work with workers on other important demands, signaling progress in the negotiations.
On Tuesday, before the official end of the strike, representatives of the protesting workers met with officials from the Tamil Nadu labor department. Following the meeting, Tamil Nadu’s Minister for Industries, TRB Rajaa, announced that the workers had agreed to return to their jobs immediately. Rajaa also noted that Samsung had agreed not to retaliate against workers who had participated in the strike, stating, “Samsung agreed not to victimise the workers only for having participated in the strike.”
The minister further added that the workers would fully cooperate with the management moving forward, and Samsung would issue a formal written response to the workers’ charter of demands. He emphasized that the agreement was a step towards restoring normal operations at the factory and ensuring that the workers’ grievances were heard.
Samsung also released a statement acknowledging the end of the strike. The company stated that it welcomed CITU’s decision to call off the protest and reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining positive relationships with its employees. “We will not take action against workers who merely participated in the illegal strike. We are committed to work closely with our workers to make the Chennai factory a great place to work,” the statement read.
The workers’ protest, which began on September 9, took place near the Samsung factory in Chennai, one of two manufacturing plants the company operates in India. The factory employs around 2,000 workers and is a key facility for Samsung, producing home appliances that contribute significantly to the company’s $12 billion annual revenue in India.
One of the primary motivations behind the strike was the workers’ desire to have their union recognized. Workers had expressed frustration that without a formal union, they lacked the means to negotiate fair pay and reasonable working hours with Samsung management. Akriti Bhatia, a labor rights activist, explained the broader challenges that workers face at multinational corporations like Samsung in India. She pointed out that these companies often do not fully adhere to Indian labor laws, particularly regarding the right to unionize. “Multinational companies which set up factories in India often don’t follow Indian labour laws, which allow workers the right to association and collective bargaining,” she told the BBC.
Bhatia elaborated that these companies sometimes form internal unions that appear to represent workers but are effectively controlled by the management, preventing genuine collective bargaining. She emphasized that such companies often resist the formation of external unions, especially those with political affiliations. According to Bhatia, multinational corporations are uncomfortable with independent unions and prefer internal structures that limit workers’ autonomy.
A source from Samsung echoed this view, telling the BBC earlier in the strike that the company “fully supports unions but not ones backed by a third-party.” This reflects a common stance taken by multinational corporations operating in India, where external unions with political backing are viewed with suspicion.
The recent Samsung strike is not an isolated incident. Earlier this year, hundreds of workers at a factory in Tamil Nadu, operated by an Apple supplier, also went on strike. Like the Samsung workers, they too were demanding recognition of their union. The trend of labor strikes in India’s technology and electronics manufacturing sector underscores the growing tension between workers and multinational companies, especially when it comes to labor rights and union recognition.
While the Samsung strike has come to an end, the outcome of the court’s decision on whether to recognize the Samsung India Labour Welfare Union will likely have a lasting impact on labor relations at the factory. Workers have indicated that they are prepared to continue fighting for their union, even as they return to work under the current terms.
Samsung’s decision to engage with workers on their demands and refrain from penalizing them for striking could be seen as a positive step toward improving labor relations in the long run. However, the unresolved issue of union recognition suggests that labor disputes may continue unless a more concrete resolution is reached. For now, though, the focus shifts to how Samsung and its workers navigate the ongoing negotiations regarding wages, working conditions, and future labor relations.
Church Delegation Seeks Affirmative Action for Dalit Christians
A church delegation has called upon a government-appointed panel to extend affirmative action benefits to Dalit Christians, whose ancestors were historically classified as untouchable within India’s rigid caste-based social structure. The delegation, comprising 15 members, met with a commission led by retired Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan to discuss the ongoing marginalization of Dalit Christians. According to Father Anthony Raj Thumma, a member of the delegation, the group presented their concerns regarding the hardships faced by Dalit Christians.
In 2022, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government established a three-member commission to examine whether Dalit individuals who have converted to Christianity or Islam should be entitled to the same social welfare benefits currently available to Dalits of Hindu, Buddhist, and Sikh faiths. Father Thumma, who also serves as the secretary of the Indian bishops’ Office for Ecumenism, shared that the commission listened attentively to their appeal and requested additional clarifications.
On October 12, the delegation, led by Montfort Brother Jos Daniel, met with the commission in New Delhi, where they submitted a memorandum expressing their grievances. India is home to 201 million Dalits, and nearly 60 percent of the country’s 25 million Christians can trace their roots to Dalit or tribal communities. Despite legal progress, such as the 1955 law making untouchability a criminal offense, social discrimination against Dalits persists in various forms.
Despite the law, Dalit Christians and Muslims have been excluded from affirmative action benefits for the last seven decades. This exclusion stems from the argument that Christianity and Islam do not adhere to the hierarchical Hindu caste system, which has historically defined Dalit identity. As a result, successive governments have denied them access to the social welfare programs designed to assist Dalits. These programs, which were introduced under India’s constitution, are aimed at integrating Dalits—officially referred to as Scheduled Castes (SCs)—into mainstream society. The benefits include reserved seats in educational institutions, job quotas, and representation in legislative bodies.
The roots of this exclusion can be traced back to a presidential order issued in 1950, which limited these benefits to Dalit Hindus on the grounds that the Dalit caste only existed within Hinduism. However, amendments to the order later included Dalit Sikhs and Buddhists in the list of those eligible for benefits. Dalit Christians, however, continue to be excluded, and Church leaders have long argued that conversion to Christianity does not eradicate the socio-economic disadvantages associated with being a Dalit. They maintain that Dalit Christians experience “double discrimination”—not only are they ostracized by society, but they are also neglected by the government in terms of social welfare.
Two decades ago, leaders from the Christian and Muslim communities jointly filed a petition with India’s Supreme Court, calling for an end to the discrimination faced by Dalit Christians and Muslims. The court is expected to address the issue next month, following the release of the commission’s findings.
This is not the first time a government commission has studied the question of extending SC status to Dalit Christians and Muslims. Two previous panels, the Ranganath Misra Commission in 2004 and the Rajinder Sachar Commission in 2005, both recommended granting affirmative action benefits to Dalit Christians and Muslims. These commissions argued that converting to religions such as Christianity and Islam—often described as “egalitarian” faiths—had not significantly improved the socio-economic conditions of Dalit converts.
Despite these recommendations, the Modi government rejected the proposals made by the earlier commissions. Instead, they formed a new panel under the leadership of Justice Balakrishnan, who himself hails from the Dalit community. The current commission has been consulting with various stakeholders, including Church officials and Muslim leaders, to gather insights before delivering its final report.
Social commentators often point out that the appointment of commissions is a common tactic used by Indian governments to delay taking action on contentious issues. In this case, the inclusion of Christians and Muslims of Dalit origin in the SC list has been consistently avoided by successive governments, likely due to concerns about a potential backlash from the Hindu majority, which constitutes roughly 90 percent of the population.
The longstanding issue has deeply affected Dalit Christians, who argue that the conversion to Christianity did not significantly alter their social standing. “Changing one’s religion does not change one’s socio-economic condition,” said a Dalit Christian leader. “Our people still face discrimination, and the government has also turned its back on us.”
The Dalit community has historically been positioned outside of India’s four-tier caste system and was subjected to the harshest forms of social ostracism. While the practice of untouchability was officially outlawed in 1955, its impact remains deeply ingrained in society. Dalit Christians, in particular, find themselves in a vulnerable position. While they are no longer legally untouchable, they often face persistent prejudice from the broader community. Furthermore, the government’s refusal to extend SC benefits to Dalit Christians means that they are denied crucial social protections, such as access to reserved government jobs and educational opportunities.
The denial of these benefits has created a cycle of marginalization, where Dalit Christians are pushed to the periphery of both their religious and social communities. This exclusion exacerbates existing inequalities and limits opportunities for upward mobility. For many Dalit Christians, the hope for change now lies with the recommendations of the current commission. If the commission decides to include Dalit Christians and Muslims in the SC category, it could mark a significant shift in India’s social and political landscape.
The Modi government’s decision to appoint a new commission is being watched closely by social and political analysts, as it could signal the government’s stance on affirmative action for religious minorities. However, some remain skeptical about whether the government will take action, given the political sensitivities surrounding the issue.
Meanwhile, the Church and other organizations continue to advocate for equal treatment for Dalit Christians. As the commission prepares to finalize its report, there is growing anticipation about the potential outcomes. If the commission recommends affirmative action for Dalit Christians, the government will face significant pressure to implement the changes. However, if the commission’s findings are ignored, it is likely that Dalit Christians will continue their fight for social and economic justice, both through the courts and public advocacy.
As India’s Supreme Court prepares to hear the case next month, the outcome of this long-standing issue may finally come to light. Whether or not the commission’s recommendations will lead to concrete policy changes remains uncertain, but the calls for equality and justice for Dalit Christians continue to grow stronger with each passing day.
Will India permit Euthanasia?
An easy or painless death, or the intentional termination of life at the request of a person suffering from an incurable or painful disease is called euthanasia or mercy killing. In other words the act of killing someone who is very sick or very old so that they do not suffer more, comes under euthanasia.
So far, euthanasia is a crime in India. Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) deals with attempted suicide and Section 306 of the IPC deals with abetment of suicide – both acts are punishable. Only those who are brain dead can escape their lives with the consent of family members.
Euthanasia laws differ in different countries. The British House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics defines euthanasia as “deliberate intervention carried out with the express purpose of ending a life to relieve intractable suffering”. Euthanasia is classified into different methods which include voluntary, non-voluntary and voluntary.[6] Voluntary euthanasia is where a person wishes to end their own life and is legal in developing countries. Non-voluntary euthanasia occurs when a patient’s consent is not available and is legal in some countries under certain limited conditions, both active and passive forms. Voluntary euthanasia, performed without consent or against the patient’s will, is illegal in all countries and is usually considered murder.
While there is a move in the British Parliament to introduce a bill to legalize doctor-assisted euthanasia, many people, including UK Malayalis, are fighting for their lives. The bill, which will be introduced by MP Kim Leadbeater on October 16 to give terminally ill people the opportunity to “choose” the end of life, is being criticized on social media. Parliamentarians will discuss the issue. The reason for the concern is that if the law comes into force, euthanasia will be fully legalized in England and Wales.
As the Constitution Bench had done earlier in the Gian Kaur case, the court reaffirmed that the right to die with dignity is a fundamental right and held that an adult man with the mental capacity to make an informed decision has the right to refuse medical treatment. Treatment including termination of life. On 19 May 2023 The Supreme Court’s consideration of revised draft guidelines for the practice of euthanasia in India is a welcome move. This includes patients who do not recover from brain death after 72 hours.
Advocates of mercy killing argue that for patients who are in vegetative states with no prospect of recovery, letting them die prevents future needless and futile treatment efforts. If they are suffering then killing them prevents further suffering
In 2018 the Supreme Court recognised the right to die with dignity as a fundamental right and prescribed guidelines for terminally ill patients to enforce the right. In 2023 the Supreme Court modified the guidelines to make the right to die with dignity more accessible.
The Supreme Court has also raised this issue in the recent judgement3. ‘Mercy killing’ should not lead to ‘killing mercy’ in the hands of noble medical professionals.
The main reason cited against mercy death is the potential for abuse, where individuals could be coerced or manipulated into choosing death.
If there is no hope and the person suffers with every breath, why do we let them suffer it? Isn’t that cruel? When hospice is called in they medicate you into almost a coma till you pass.
Euthanasia, even if it is at the request of the patient, is suicidal and a violation of the Ten commandment “Thou shalt not kill”. Against this, the call for Malayalis who always uphold moral values to sign the online campaign is getting stronger.
India’s Billionaires Cross $1 Trillion Milestone as Wealth Soars
India’s wealthiest individuals reached a significant achievement this year, with their combined net worth exceeding $1 trillion for the first time, according to a recent Forbes report. This milestone reflects the optimistic investor sentiment around India’s economy, driven by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s successful bid for a third consecutive term earlier in the year. This confidence has also spurred the stock market, with the BSE Sensex seeing a 30% rise over the last 12 months.
According to Forbes, India’s 100 wealthiest individuals now collectively hold a net worth of $1.1 trillion, which has more than doubled since 2019. Over the past year alone, these billionaires added $316 billion to their collective fortune, representing a staggering 40% increase.
A significant majority—more than 80%—of the individuals on this list saw a rise in their wealth, with 58 of them gaining at least $1 billion. Several of the country’s most prominent business tycoons witnessed substantial increases in their fortunes, with half a dozen adding more than $10 billion to their net worth. Together, the top five richest people in the nation contributed nearly $120 billion to the overall wealth surge.
Mukesh Ambani and Gautam Adani Lead the Way
Mukesh Ambani, chairman of Reliance Industries, retains his position as the richest person in India. His wealth grew by $27.5 billion this year, bringing his total net worth to $119.5 billion. Ambani continues to dominate the wealth rankings in the country.
Not far behind Ambani is Gautam Adani, the head of the Adani Group, whose fortune saw an even more dramatic rise. Adani’s net worth increased by $48 billion, reaching $116 billion, making him the year’s largest gainer. This marked a notable recovery for Adani, who had faced significant scrutiny following short-selling allegations by Hindenburg Research last year. His rise has been supported by strategic business moves, including placing family members in key positions within his conglomerate.
Notable Wealth Gainers
The Forbes report also highlights several other prominent business figures who have seen substantial wealth increases over the past year. Among them is Savitri Jindal, the head of the O.P. Jindal Group, who now ranks as the third-richest person in India with a net worth of $43.7 billion. Jindal’s wealth grew by $19.7 billion in just 12 months, largely driven by the company’s ventures into new sectors, including electric vehicles, through partnerships with companies like MG Motor.
Shiv Nadar, the founder of technology giant HCL, comes in fourth place with a net worth of $40.2 billion. Both Nadar and Jindal are among the six individuals who added more than $10 billion to their fortunes this year.
The pharmaceutical industry has also seen significant gains. Dilip Shanghvi, founder of Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, climbed to fifth place with a net worth of $32.4 billion, up from $19 billion last year.
Additionally, the Mehta brothers, Sudhir and Samir, of Torrent Pharmaceuticals, saw their wealth more than double to $16.3 billion, as their company pursued potential acquisitions in the healthcare sector.
A Historic Year for India’s Billionaires
The year 2024 has been a turning point for India’s richest individuals. Their collective wealth grew by 40%, from $799 billion in 2023 to $1.1 trillion this year. The 30% rise in the BSE Sensex and growing confidence in the Indian economy have played crucial roles in this dramatic increase. As per Forbes, over 80% of those on the list saw their wealth rise, with 58 individuals adding at least $1 billion to their net worth.
This year also saw the entry of several new billionaires to Forbes’ ranking. Among the four newcomers is B. Partha Saradhi Reddy, the founder of Hetero Labs, who debuted in 81st place with a net worth of $3.95 billion. Mahima Datla, who controls vaccine maker Biological E, also made her debut, taking the 100th spot with a net worth of $3.3 billion. Other new entrants include Harish Ahuja of Shahi Exports and Surender Saluja, founder of Premier Energies.
For the first time, the Godrej family’s holdings were split between two factions, resulting in separate entries on the list. The wealth threshold to enter the Forbes rankings rose to $3.3 billion this year, compared to $2.3 billion in 2023. Consequently, 11 billionaires from the previous year were pushed off the list.
India’s Top 10 Richest for 2024
As of 2024, the top 10 richest individuals in India are as follows:
- Mukesh Ambani: With a total net worth of $119.5 billion, Ambani continues to hold the title of India’s richest person. His wealth increased by $27.5 billion in the past year, cementing his position at the top of the list.
- Gautam Adani: Adani’s net worth surged by an impressive $48 billion, bringing his total to $116 billion. This remarkable recovery follows challenges posed by the Hindenburg Research allegations, and Adani is now the largest gainer of the year.
- Savitri Jindal: As the head of the O.P. Jindal Group, Jindal now has a net worth of $43.7 billion, a $19.7 billion increase from the previous year, making her the third-richest person in India.
- Shiv Nadar: The founder of HCL, Nadar’s fortune grew by $10 billion, bringing his total net worth to $40.2 billion.
- Dilip Shanghvi: Shanghvi, who founded Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, saw his wealth rise to $32.4 billion, marking a significant increase from $19 billion in 2023.
- Radhakishan Damani: The retail magnate saw his fortune grow to $31.5 billion, securing his spot among the top billionaires in India.
- Sunil Mittal: Mittal’s wealth increased to $30.7 billion this year, thanks to the strong performance of his telecommunications company, Bharti Enterprises.
- Kumar Birla: The industrialist Kumar Birla’s wealth grew to $24.8 billion, ensuring his place among India’s top 10 wealthiest individuals.
- Cyrus Poonawalla: Poonawalla, who controls the Serum Institute of India, one of the world’s largest vaccine makers, saw his fortune rise to $24.5 billion.
- The Bajaj Family: Rounding out the top 10 are the Bajaj family, whose combined wealth totals $23.4 billion, driven by their holdings in finance and automobiles.
India’s billionaires have had an exceptional year, with wealth growth reaching unprecedented levels. The outlook remains optimistic, with investor confidence in the country’s economic future continuing to drive stock market gains and fuel the fortunes of the nation’s richest individuals.
Indian Government Opposes Criminalizing Marital Rape, Calling It ‘Excessively Harsh’
The Indian government has stated that criminalizing marital rape would be “excessively harsh,” a stance that has come as a disappointment to campaigners advocating for changes ahead of a Supreme Court decision that could have long-lasting implications for the country’s legal system and its treatment of women. Presently, in India, forcing sex upon a wife is not considered rape as long as she is over the age of 18, an exception carried over from a British colonial-era law.
While most Western nations have long abolished the idea that marital rape is permissible, with the UK outlawing it in 1991, and it being illegal in all 50 US states, about 40 countries worldwide still have no legislation to address the issue. Even in countries where marital rape is recognized as a crime, the penalties for non-consensual sex within marriage are significantly lower compared to other cases of rape, according to a 2021 report by the United Nations Population Fund.
In India, campaigners have fought for years against this marital rape exemption, and the country’s Supreme Court is currently reviewing petitions calling for its removal. This comes after a split verdict from the Delhi High Court in 2022 on the issue. The Indian government’s Ministry of Home Affairs has officially opposed these petitions, arguing that while a man should face “penal consequences” for forcing sex on his wife, treating it as rape would have broader societal consequences, potentially undermining the marital relationship and the institution of marriage.
The government’s position, outlined in a written affidavit, expressed concerns that criminalizing marital rape “can be arguably considered to be excessively harsh and therefore, disproportionate.” This is the most explicit stance the government has taken so far on the matter.
Advocates pushing for the criminalization of marital rape were not surprised by the government’s position but expressed deep concern over the message it sends in a country where sexual violence against women is already widespread. Ntasha Bhardwaj, a scholar specializing in criminal justice and gender, commented on the matter, saying, “It speaks to India’s acceptance of sexual violence in our culture. We’ve normalized that sexual violence is a part of being a woman in our country.”
The issue of marital rape has gained renewed attention since the Indian government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, updated the country’s 164-year-old penal code earlier this year. However, despite these updates, the marital rape exemption remains intact.
India has faced ongoing challenges in addressing violence against women, with several high-profile rape cases over the years sparking both national and international outrage. Just two months ago, the rape and murder of a young doctor in Kolkata led to mass protests across the country, with health workers demanding better protection. On Monday, the Central Bureau of Investigation charged a man with her rape and murder.
In its opposition to the criminalization of marital rape, the Indian government maintained that within marriage, a spouse has “a continuing expectation… to have reasonable sexual access” to the other. While this does not justify coercion or force, the government argued that the consequences of sexual violations within marriage are different from those outside of it. It further claimed that existing laws covering sexual and domestic violence already provide adequate protection for women.
Mariam Dhawale, General Secretary of the All India Democratic Women’s Association (AIDWA), which is one of the petitioners pushing for the criminalization of marital rape, disagreed with this reasoning. She pointed out that consent is a fundamental issue, regardless of whether the person is married. “Consent is consent,” she stated. “In our country, a woman is not thought of as an independent human being, as an independent citizen of the country. She is like an appendage to the husband. She’s subordinate, she’s not a separate identity as such.”
Dhawale emphasized that many of the women seeking help from her organization report sexual violence in their marriages, but most do not openly voice these allegations. “Because they know that nobody will believe them, and it’s not considered a crime,” she added. Changing the law to criminalize marital rape would be a crucial step toward addressing this, although Bhardwaj pointed out that legal reform alone is not enough. “It’s a cultural revolution underneath. Until and unless you make a big statement that this is not okay, the culture will never shift, because by not having that law, the culture is accepting of that violence,” she said.
Current Indian laws do provide women with some legal recourse if they are victims of sexual violence within their marriages. Women can seek restraining orders or file charges under existing laws like Section 354 of the Penal Code, which deals with sexual assault, or Section 498A, which addresses cruelty, particularly in cases related to dowry. There is also the Domestic Violence Act. However, advocates argue that these laws fall short and often leave women vulnerable to legal interpretation. A recent case in Madhya Pradesh highlighted this issue when a judge dismissed a woman’s complaint about her husband committing “unnatural sex,” citing the marital rape exemption as justification.
Women in abusive marriages, particularly those dependent on their husbands financially, face an even greater challenge, said Dhawale. “We don’t have any kind of safe places, shelter homes, institutions. So she has to remain in the four walls of that place. She cannot complain, because if she complains, she has no place to go… nobody will stand by her, unless and until it’s recognized as a crime.”
One woman, a survivor of marital rape, told CNN that criminalizing rape within marriage would empower women to stop their abuse. Another woman expressed her fears of leaving her husband because she would have no means to support her three children. “Outlawing marital rape is needed for women like me, who don’t have an avenue to leave,” she said.
India’s Supreme Court took a step in 2017 by raising the age of consent for marriage from 15 to 18 in a landmark decision. Jayna Kothari, a senior advocate who argued against child marital rape in that case, said the government made similar arguments back then, warning that changing the law would threaten the institution of marriage. However, the Supreme Court rejected those arguments. Recognizing marital rape now, Kothari added, would significantly enhance women’s equality in marriage.
Dhawale echoed these sentiments, stating that the real threat to marriage comes from the husband committing violence, not from women seeking justice. One concern raised by men’s rights groups and the government is that a law criminalizing marital rape could lead to false accusations. But Kothari countered that such fears are largely unfounded. “It’s still going to be very difficult,” she said, noting that women already face immense challenges in reporting domestic violence, even when laws are in their favor.
Ajay Jadeja Declared the Next Jam Saheb of Nawanagar
Former Indian cricketer Ajay Jadeja has been announced as the next Jam Saheb of Nawanagar, also known as Jamnagar, a historic princely state located in the Halar region on the southern coast of the Gulf of Kutch in Gujarat. The confirmation of this significant appointment came through an official statement from the current Maharaja Jam Saheb of Nawanagar.
Ajay Jadeja, who was a prominent figure in Indian cricket during the 1990s, has a deep-rooted connection with both cricket and royalty. The former cricketer represented India between 1992 and 2000, featuring in 15 Test matches and 196 One-Day Internationals (ODIs). His cricketing legacy is bolstered by his family ties, as two of India’s most prestigious cricket tournaments—the Ranji Trophy and Duleep Trophy—were named after his relatives, K S Ranjitsinhji and K S Duleepsinhji, respectively.
The announcement was made by the current Jam Saheb, ShatrusalyasinhjiDigvijaysinhji Jadeja, who confirmed that Ajay Jadeja would be his successor. In a letter shared by the news agency ANI, Shatrusalyasinhji stated, “Ajay has also agreed to become my heir,” solidifying Jadeja’s role as the next ruler of Nawanagar.
This declaration follows Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the Jam Saheb of Nawanagar Memorial in Warsaw, Poland, earlier in August. Modi’s visit paid tribute to the long-standing ties between India and Poland, particularly remembering the humanitarian efforts of the Maharaja during World War II. The Jam Saheb of Nawanagar is remembered for offering refuge to hundreds of Polish children during the war.
After visiting the memorial, PM Modi spoke about the significance of the Jam Saheb’s contributions, stating, “I saw a direct and living example of our deep people-to-people ties yesterday. I had the privilege of paying tribute at the memorial of Maharaja of Kolhapur. I am happy that even today the people of Poland respect his philanthropy and generosity.” The Prime Minister also announced the creation of a new program in honor of the Jam Saheb, adding, “To immortalize his memory, we are going to start the Jam Saheb Nawanagar Youth Action Program between India and Poland. Every year, 20 young people from Poland will be taken on a visit to India.”
Ajay Jadeja’s life extends beyond cricket. He has ventured into various fields, including acting and television. Jadeja appeared in a few Bollywood films and alsoparticipated in the popular Indian dance reality show, *Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa*. In recent years, he has established himself as a cricket commentator and expert, providing insights and analysis on the sport he once played at the highest level.
Jadeja’s involvement in cricket, however, did not end with his playing days or commentary. In 2023, he took on the role of mentor for the Afghanistan cricket team during the ODI World Cup. His experience and knowledge were considered invaluable for the young team, highlighting his continuing influence in the cricketing world even after his retirement from professional play.
The announcement of Jadeja as the Jam Saheb of Nawanagar marks a new chapter in his multifaceted life. Although his royal lineage was always known, his selection as the heir to the throne solidifies his connection to the rich history of the region. For many, Jadeja is synonymous with cricket, but his role as the next Jam Saheb brings to the forefront the legacy of his royal family and its contributions to India and beyond.
Jadeja’s family, especially K S Ranjitsinhji and K S Duleepsinhji, are considered pioneers in Indian cricket, having left a lasting impact on the sport. The Ranji Trophy, named after Ranjitsinhji, remains one of the most prestigious tournaments in Indian domestic cricket, while the Duleep Trophy, named after Duleepsinhji, is another significant tournament that honors the family’s contributions. These connections have always tied Jadeja’s cricketing career to the legacy of his ancestors.
Now, with his acceptance as the Jam Saheb of Nawanagar, Jadeja steps into a role that not only highlights his royal lineage but also positions him as a custodian of the state’s heritage and traditions. His acceptance as the heir to Nawanagar was made clear in the official announcement from ShatrusalyasinhjiDigvijaysinhji Jadeja, and it has been welcomed by many who recognize the deep ties between cricket and royalty in India.
As the next Jam Saheb, Jadeja will inherit responsibilities that go beyond the cricket field. Nawanagar’s royal family has a long and storied history, with ties to various social, cultural, and philanthropic endeavors. It is expected that Jadeja, known for his leadership and charisma during his cricketing days, will bring those same qualities to his new role as the ruler of Nawanagar.
Prime Minister Modi’s visit to the Jam Saheb of Nawanagar Memorial in Poland added a historical dimension to the announcement. Modi’s remarks reflected the deep admiration that the people of Poland have for the Maharaja’s generosity during World War II. By establishing the Jam Saheb Nawanagar Youth Action Program, Modi highlighted the lasting impact of the Maharaja’s contributions and ensured that future generations would continue to honor and remember this important part of history.
Ajay Jadeja’s life has taken yet another turn, this time away from the world of sports and into the realm of royalty. His appointment as the next Jam Saheb of Nawanagar not only honors his family’s rich legacy but also adds a new chapter to his own multifaceted life. Whether on the cricket field, in films, or now as a royal figure, Jadeja’s influence continues to grow, and his new role as Jam Saheb will likely enhance his already significant contributions to Indian society.
US Mission in India Expands Visa Appointments for Indian Travelers by 250,000
The United States Mission to India recently revealed that it has opened an additional 250,000 visa appointments, benefiting Indian tourists, skilled workers, and students. This expansion is part of an ongoing effort to meet the growing demand for visas in India. US immigration officials have also noted that 2024 has been a record year for visa processing, with unprecedented numbers of applications being handled at the country’s five consular offices.
As of September 30, 2024, over 1.2 million Indians have traveled to the United States this year alone. This marks a significant increase of 35% compared to the same period in 2023. The US Mission also highlighted that “At least six million Indians already have a non-immigrant visa to visit the United States, and each day, the Mission issues thousands more.”
The major rise in demand for US visas comes on the heels of a collaborative promise made by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Joe Biden. They set an ambitious goal to streamline and expedite the visa process. Speaking on the progress, US Ambassador to India, Eric Garcetti, expressed his satisfaction, saying, “Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Joe Biden set an ambitious goal to improve and expedite the visa process and I’m proud to say that we have delivered on that promise. Our consular teams at the embassy and four consulates work tirelessly to ensure that we meet the surging demand.”
This recent development is expected to significantly benefit Indian students who are eager to pursue their studies in the United States. The reduction in wait times will also ease the visa application process for other travelers. The backlog for study visa applicants, which has been a notable issue for some time, could now see considerable relief. Previously, visa interview wait times had stretched to 200 days or more in India, with applicants facing lengthy delays. However, with the September announcement, these times have improved dramatically.
As of October 9, 2024, updated wait times for F-visa interview appointments—the primary visa type for students—have dropped significantly. The average waiting period is now 42 days for applications submitted in New Delhi and 66 days for those in Mumbai. This reduction is a crucial development, especially for students facing tight deadlines related to university admissions and course start dates.
Earlier in the year, the lengthy visa processing times were a major point of concern for not only students but also for businesses and advocacy groups. The U.S. for Success Coalition, in particular, has been actively lobbying for reforms to address the visa backlogs in key markets such as India and Africa. These efforts have gained traction, with significant improvements now being seen.
“Yes, indeed our advocacy is helping to move the needle,” said Dr. Fanta Aw, CEO and executive director of NAFSA: Association of International Educators. “We want to be sure international students who are admitted to institutions in the US are able to get in for appointments, and we appreciate the work of Consular Affairs to continue to prioritize students. We, however, need to do better on reducing visa denials so as not to deter students wanting to come study in the US. NAFSA and the U.S. for Success Coalition are committed to working with the State Department on this important issue.”
These developments are expected to further boost the attractiveness of the United States as a destination for Indian students. The US has long been a favored choice for international students, and this move to expand visa appointments will likely strengthen that position even further. This is especially notable given the changing policy environments in other competing countries, such as Canada and Australia, which have recently seen shifts in demand.
Canada, in particular, has traditionally been a top choice for Indian students, but recent policy changes have made it more challenging for some to obtain student visas. Meanwhile, Australia has also been reworking its visa policies, leading to uncertainty for international applicants. These shifts have caused some prospective students to reconsider their options, and the US is now better positioned to capitalize on this trend.
The U.S. for Success Coalition and other advocacy groups continue to emphasize the importance of ensuring that the visa process is as seamless as possible for international students. They are advocating for further reductions in both visa appointment wait times and denial rates, which can create unnecessary obstacles for students who have already been admitted to US institutions. By continuing to work with the US State Department, these groups hope to ensure that the United States remains a top destination for education and employment opportunities.
Moreover, the increased availability of visa appointments for tourists and skilled workers will likely have broader economic implications for both the United States and India. With more visas being issued, there is the potential for stronger economic ties, greater tourism revenues, and increased collaboration between the two countries in various industries. The influx of Indian travelers is expected to contribute positively to the US economy, particularly in sectors like tourism, hospitality, and education.
For skilled workers, the additional visa appointments could also help address labor shortages in certain sectors within the US. Many American companies rely on skilled professionals from India, particularly in fields such as information technology, engineering, and healthcare. By easing the visa process, the US government is making it easier for these workers to enter the country and contribute to its economy.
At the same time, this move helps to address one of the major pain points for Indian travelers and workers—the long wait times for visa appointments. In previous years, applicants often faced months-long delays, which could disrupt their travel plans or employment opportunities. With this latest expansion of visa appointments, many of these challenges are being alleviated, providing a smoother and more efficient process for those wishing to visit or work in the United States.
The US Mission’s expansion of visa appointments is a clear indicator of the growing importance of India as a strategic partner for the United States. By improving access to visas, the US is not only facilitating greater mobility between the two countries but also reinforcing the strong diplomatic and economic ties that have been developing in recent years.
The United States’ decision to open an additional 250,000 visa appointments for Indian travelers represents a significant step toward meeting the increasing demand for visas in India. This move, coupled with ongoing efforts to reduce wait times and improve visa processing, will greatly benefit Indian students, tourists, and skilled workers alike. As the US continues to streamline its visa process, it is likely to remain a top destination for Indian travelers, further strengthening the relationship between the two nations.
Bill Gates, Sundar Pichai Pay Tribute to Visionary Leader Ratan Tata
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates expressed heartfelt condolences on the passing of Ratan Tata, praising the Indian industrialist as a visionary whose dedication to improving lives had a global impact. In a LinkedIn post, Gates fondly remembered his interactions with Tata and commended his unwavering commitment to service and humanity.
Reflecting on his personal meetings with the late Tata, Gates shared how he was consistently moved by the business magnate’s deep sense of purpose. “I was always moved by his strong sense of purpose and service to humanity,” Gates wrote. He added that Tata’s legacy, marked by his work for the betterment of society, will continue to inspire future generations.
Gates and Tata collaborated on multiple philanthropic projects aimed at improving health and wellbeing. “Together, we partnered on numerous initiatives to help people lead healthier, more prosperous lives. His loss will be felt around the world for years to come, but I know the legacy he left and example he set will continue to inspire generations,” Gates said in his post. Along with his tribute, Gates shared a photograph of himself with Tata, a reminder of their association in various humanitarian ventures.
The partnership between the two prominent leaders extended to several key areas. In March of last year, Gates visited India and met both Ratan Tata and Tata Sons Chairman Natarajan Chandrasekaran. During the meeting, the trio discussed potential collaborations, with a focus on strengthening efforts in health, diagnostics, and nutrition. Their conversation centered on finding ways to enhance the effectiveness of joint initiatives that aimed at tackling some of the world’s pressing issues. Gates also gifted Tata copies of his books, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic” and “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster,” reflecting their shared interest in global challenges.
The news of Ratan Tata’s death at the age of 86, at Mumbai’s Breach Candy Hospital, has sent shockwaves through business communities and prompted an outpouring of grief and admiration from leaders around the world. Tata’s contributions to India and beyond were vast, leaving a legacy not just as a titan of industry, but as a philanthropist and compassionate leader.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi was among the prominent voices who remembered Tata, describing him as both a visionary business leader and a kind soul. Modi’s tribute emphasized Tata’s lasting influence on Indian business and his efforts to uplift millions through his philanthropic initiatives.
Another leading figure in the tech world, Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and Alphabet, paid homage to Ratan Tata’s “business and philanthropic legacy.” Recalling his personal experience with the Tata Group’s Chairman Emeritus, Pichai reflected on how deeply Tata cared about India and its progress. He reminisced about their discussion on Google’s autonomous driving technology, Waymo, noting how Tata’s vision for the future was “inspiring to hear.” Pichai praised Tata as a mentor to India’s business leaders, recognizing him as a key figure who shaped modern Indian entrepreneurship.
The flood of tributes from around the world underscores the profound respect and admiration held for Ratan Tata. Business leaders, politicians, and philanthropists have highlighted different aspects of his life, showing how multifaceted and impactful his contributions were. Among them, Anand Mahindra, Chairman of the Mahindra Group, shared his sorrow over the loss of Tata, recognizing him as a guiding light in India’s industrial sector. Similarly, Harsh Goenka, Chairman of RPG Enterprises, remembered Tata for his wisdom, kindness, and generosity, sentiments echoed by many who had the privilege of working with or knowing him.
Ratan Tata’s name has become synonymous with India’s economic rise, yet his legacy is also marked by his philanthropic endeavors. Under his leadership, the Tata Group expanded into a global entity, making major strides in industries such as steel, automobiles, and technology. However, it was his focus on social causes, ranging from healthcare to education, that cemented his reputation as not only a business giant but a humanitarian leader. His initiatives in supporting rural development, disaster relief, and cancer treatment are just a few examples of his lasting contributions.
Tata’s passing has created a palpable void in the world of business and philanthropy. He was one of the few individuals who seamlessly combined corporate success with a deep commitment to social responsibility. His unique approach to leadership, driven by empathy and a desire to make the world a better place, earned him respect far beyond India’s borders.
In an era where corporations are increasingly scrutinized for their role in society, Ratan Tata stood out as a beacon of what a business leader could achieve when aligned with a moral compass. His ability to navigate the complexities of global markets while maintaining an unwavering commitment to the people of India is what set him apart. Many admired how he was able to grow the Tata Group while always keeping the needs of the community at the forefront of his decisions.
Tata’s influence extended beyond the confines of the boardroom. He was known for mentoring the next generation of business leaders, encouraging innovation, and advocating for ethical business practices. His guidance helped shape the careers of numerous young entrepreneurs and executives, who now carry forward his philosophy of combining business acumen with social responsibility.
As tributes continue to pour in from across the globe, it is evident that Ratan Tata’s legacy is not confined to his lifetime achievements. His influence will continue to be felt for generations to come, through the initiatives he championed, the people he mentored, and the industries he transformed.
Bill Gates’ poignant tribute encapsulates the global appreciation for Tata’s life and work. “His loss will be felt around the world for years to come,” Gates remarked, speaking for many who were touched by Tata’s life. “But I know the legacy he left and the example he set will continue to inspire generations.”
In remembering Ratan Tata, the world pays homage to a man who not only shaped modern India but also set a standard for corporate leaders everywhere—one that emphasizes responsibility, humanity, and service to others. His death is a reminder of the indelible impact that one individual, driven by a deep sense of purpose, can have on the world.
Ratan Tata: A Legacy of Leadership, Humility, and Heartfelt Philanthropy
On October 9, 2024, India mourned the loss of one of its most revered industrialists, Ratan Tata, who passed away at the age of 86. His death marked the end of a distinguished era in Indian business leadership. The patriarch of the Tata Group was battling age-related ailments and was undergoing treatment at Breach Candy Hospital in Mumbai, where he spent his last days.
Early Life and Challenges
Born on December 28, 1937, in Bombay, Ratan Tata had a turbulent childhood. His parents, Naval Tata and Soonoo Commisariat, separated when he was just seven years old. Following their divorce, Ratan Tata and his younger brother Jimmy were raised by their grandmother, Lady Navajbai Tata. Despite these early challenges, Tata’s upbringing instilled in him the values of humility and perseverance.
Tata pursued a degree in architecture from Cornell University, graduating in 1962. He further refined his leadership skills by enrolling in Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management Program in 1975. Though he had an offer to join IBM, on the advice of JRD Tata, the then-chairman of Tata Sons, Ratan opted to join the family business.
Transformation of the Tata Group
Ratan Tata began his career on the shop floor of Tata Steel, starting as a low-level worker. His hands-on experience gave him a deep understanding of the business from the ground up. In 1991, he took over as chairman of Tata Sons from JRD Tata, marking the beginning of his two-decade leadership.
During his tenure, Ratan Tata spearheaded several acquisitions that placed the Tata Group on the global map. His vision was not just about expanding the group but about positioning it as a multinational giant:
1. Tetley Tea Acquisition (2000): Tata Tea’s acquisition of Tetley for $450 million was one of the first major moves under his leadership. It made Tata Tea the second-largest tea company in the world.
2. Corus Steel (2007): The Tata Group made headlines by acquiring British steelmaker Corus for $8 billion. Although the acquisition later proved challenging due to changes in European regulations and competition from China, it established the Tata Group’s global steel presence.
3. Jaguar Land Rover (2008): Perhaps the most significant of Tata’s moves was the acquisition of the luxury car brands Jaguar and Land Rover from Ford for $2.3 billion. Despite initial skepticism, the buyout turned out to be a massive success, with the brands contributing significantly to Tata Motors’ revenue.
Visionary Leadership and Legacy
Ratan Tata’s legacy extends beyond business. His leadership was characterized by ethical principles and a deep sense of social responsibility. Under his leadership, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) emerged as India’s largest IT services company, growing to employ over 600,000 people from more than 135 nationalities. He also expanded the Tata Group’s philanthropic activities, focusing on education, rural development, and healthcare.
One of his most ambitious projects was the Tata Nano, launched in 2010. Marketed as the world’s most affordable car, the Tata Nano was a symbol of Tata’s belief in making transportation accessible to the common Indian. Although the project did not achieve the commercial success expected, it reflected his innovative spirit and commitment to inclusive growth.
Tata stepped down as chairman of Tata Sons in 2012, making way for new leadership, but his influence continued to shape the conglomerate long after his retirement.
Tributes and Impact
The news of Ratan Tata’s passing led to an outpouring of tributes from leaders across India and the world. Prime Minister Narendra Modi described Tata as a “visionary business leader, a compassionate soul, and an extraordinary human being.” Modi praised Tata’s leadership for bringing stability to one of India’s oldest business houses and for his profound contribution to society through philanthropy .
Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi called him a “man with a vision” who left a lasting mark on both business and philanthropy. Other prominent figures like Anand Mahindra and Harsh Goenka also expressed their sadness at the passing of a business titan whose life’s work shaped modern India.
Anand Mahindra wrote, “India’s economy stands on the cusp of a historic leap forward. And Ratan Tata’s life and work have much to do with our being in this position. His mentorship and guidance at this point in time would have been invaluable” .
Ratan Tata’s legacy will not only be remembered in terms of business success but also for the values of integrity and ethical leadership he stood for. His contributions to philanthropy, especially in healthcare and education, will continue to have a lasting impact on Indian society.
India Calls for Global Action to Match Global Ambition in Fight Against Terrorism
India has emphasized the need for decisive global action to combat terrorism, aligning with the ambitious commitment expressed by world leaders in the “Pact for the Future.” During a session at the United Nations, India’s Permanent Representative P. Harish highlighted the importance of matching the global ambition set forth in the Pact with equally robust global action.
Speaking on Monday, Harish stated, “We appreciate the strong message condemning terrorism in the Pact.” He went on to emphasize the importance of following this commitment with practical steps, saying, “On this, we would like to stress that ‘Global Action’ must now match ‘Global Ambition’.”
The Pact, adopted at the recent Summit of the Future, represents a significant global consensus on terrorism. It unequivocally condemns all acts of terrorism, regardless of their motivations or how the perpetrators might justify them. This clear stance challenges attempts by some countries, including Pakistan, to differentiate between terrorists and so-called “freedom fighters.” Such efforts have long hindered progress on the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (CCIT), an initiative proposed by India 28 years ago but still awaiting adoption.
During the General Assembly session focused on “Strengthening the UN System,” Harish reiterated India’s leadership role in advocating for the Global South. He pointed out that India has worked diligently to ensure that the concerns of developing nations were reflected in the Pact. India’s contributions aimed at making the Pact more “human-centric” were particularly noteworthy, he said.
Harish tied the principles of the Pact to India’s national development vision, ‘Vikst Bharat@2047’, which seeks to transform the country into a developed nation by the 100th anniversary of its independence. He noted that while prioritizing sustainable development, India pushed for the inclusion of human welfare, food security, health security, energy security, and climate finance in the global agenda.
However, he also criticized developed countries for avoiding their responsibilities when it comes to climate action. “Evasion of climate action responsibilities by the developed undermines the growth prospects of the developing,” Harish said, underscoring the detrimental impact of such actions on the growth of poorer nations.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi had also addressed these issues at the Summit, where he emphasized the need for reforms to ensure that the United Nations remains relevant. Harish echoed Modi’s call for reform, expressing disappointment that the Pact did not go far enough in addressing the critical issue of Security Council reform.
He pointed out that while the chapter on ‘Transforming Global Governance’ in the Pact was promising, it fell short of the ambitions held by many UN member states. Specifically, the majority of countries have been calling for an expansion of both non-permanent and permanent members of the Security Council, yet the Pact did not sufficiently address these demands.
“The inputs to the Pact from the Inter-Governmental Negotiations for Council reform did not go far enough in addressing the critical issues related to UN Security Council reforms and expansion,” Harish stated. He also stressed the need for text-based negotiations with a fixed timeline, which is a point of contention for several UN members.
Many countries, including India, have long advocated for the use of a negotiating text to guide discussions on Security Council reform. Such a text would serve as a concrete reference point, marking progress and helping to avoid circular debates. Yet, a small group of countries, including Italy and Pakistan, have consistently blocked the adoption of a negotiating text and have lobbied against its inclusion in the Pact.
Harish expressed India’s disappointment that these efforts to obstruct meaningful reform were successful, saying that more needs to be done to reflect the will of the majority of the UN’s members. He noted that the current system, which grants disproportionate influence to a few countries, is outdated and no longer serves the broader global community.
In addition to calling for Security Council reforms, Harish also highlighted the need for more inclusive global financial institutions. He pointed out that developing nations continue to be underrepresented in the governance of international financial institutions, and many of these countries face severe debt challenges that are not being adequately addressed.
Harish referenced the declaration adopted by G20 nations under India’s presidency last year, which converged with the goals of the Pact on key principles. The G20 declaration, like the Pact, called for reforms to make the international financial system more inclusive, sustainable, and resilient. It also advocated for stronger and more democratic global financial institutions.
“Both the G20 declaration and the Pact share a vision of reforming the international financial system to better serve the needs of all nations, not just the most powerful,” Harish said. He argued that it is crucial to ensure that developing nations have a greater voice in these institutions, as they are often the most affected by global economic instability and debt crises.
Harish concluded by reiterating India’s commitment to playing a leading role in global governance, particularly in areas that directly affect the Global South. He emphasized that India would continue to push for reforms that make international institutions more representative and accountable, while also addressing pressing global challenges such as terrorism, climate change, and economic inequality.
India’s message to the world is clear: global action must match global ambition. As new challenges emerge in areas such as cyber, maritime, and space, the international community must remain united and proactive in addressing these threats. The Pact for the Future provides a strong foundation for this work, but much remains to be done to ensure that the global governance system is truly reflective of the needs and aspirations of all nations.
Election Results 2024: BJP Triumphs in Haryana; NC-Congress Alliance Victorious in J&K
In a significant political victory, the BJP secured its third consecutive term in Haryana, winning 48 out of 90 seats. Prime Minister Narendra Modi celebrated the party’s success, calling it a victory for the Constitution. Despite predictions favoring Congress, the party managed only 37 seats.
In Jammu and Kashmir, the National Conference-Congress alliance emerged victorious, winning 49 seats in the first assembly election held since the abrogation of Article 370. The National Conference dominated with 42 seats, while Congress secured six. Prominent NC leaders, including Omar Abdullah, secured multiple wins, while the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) saw its influence wane with just three seats.
Haryana Election Highlights
The BJP’s victory in Haryana marked a historic third term, despite facing anti-incumbency and challenges from farmer protests. The Congress, which had been favored by exit polls, failed to capitalize on these issues. BJP leaders credited their focus on development and governance for the win. Meanwhile, the Jannayak Janta Party (JJP), which played a key role in the previous election, failed to secure a single seat this time. Notably, former Deputy Chief Minister Dushyant Chautala lost his seat in Uchana Kalan.
Prime Minister Modi praised the people of Haryana for supporting the BJP’s policies, and he credited the party’s ability to overcome anti-incumbency with development and good governance as key factors in their victory.
Jammu and Kashmir: The First Post-370 Election
In Jammu and Kashmir, the National Conference-Congress alliance’s win marks a significant moment in the region’s politics. The National Conference, led by Omar Abdullah, was the dominant force, while the Congress played a supporting role. Omar Abdullah won from both Budgam and Ganderbal constituencies. PDP, once a major player, secured only three seats, with its leader Mehbooba Mufti acknowledging the setback.
Senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh emphasized that the alliance’s priority would be the restoration of statehood for Jammu and Kashmir. Meanwhile, BJP emerged as the largest party by vote share but failed to gain a significant foothold in the Valley.
Union Home Minister Amit Shah hailed the peaceful conduct of the elections, emphasizing the restoration of democracy in Jammu and Kashmir. He contrasted this with past elections, which were marred by allegations of rigging.
Key Takeaways from Haryana and J&K Results
•BJP managed to secure 48 seats in Haryana, forming the government for a third consecutive term, despite strong opposition.
•In J&K, the National Conference-Congress alliance won 49 seats, with NC taking 42 of them, while the PDP was reduced to just 3 seats.
•Prominent winners included Omar Abdullah and Tariq Karra, while the PDP suffered significant losses, with many of its key leaders defeated.
•The results in both states highlight a shifting political landscape, with the BJP maintaining dominance in Haryana and a regional alliance winning in J&K.
The elections in both regions reflected the evolving political narratives, with the BJP touting its governance record in Haryana and the NC-Congress alliance focusing on restoring normalcy in Jammu and Kashmir.
USCIS Introduces Updated Guidelines for EB-1 Extraordinary Ability Eligibility
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced new policy guidelines to clarify the criteria for determining eligibility for the EB-1 immigrant visa classification for individuals of extraordinary ability (E11). The latest update, issued on October 2, 2024, is aimed at refining the evidence required to establish eligibility under the Extraordinary Ability (E11) classification and providing greater transparency to applicants and petitioners.
Key Points of the Updated Policy Guidance
The newly introduced guidance provides clarification on four key areas of evidence that can be submitted to demonstrate eligibility for the EB-1 classification for individuals with extraordinary abilities. Specifically, the USCIS has addressed the following points:
- Recognition of Team Awards as Evidence
The updated guidance confirms that USCIS will now consider a person’s receipt of team awards when assessing eligibility under the criterion for “lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of endeavor.” This means that individuals who are part of a team recognized for outstanding achievement in their field may use the team’s award as evidence of their extraordinary ability.
Previously, it was unclear how team-based awards would be treated under this category. By explicitly stating that team awards can now count as evidence, the USCIS is broadening the types of achievements that individuals can present to support their petitions. This change is particularly significant for individuals whose contributions to a team have garnered widespread recognition but who may not have received an individual award.
- Clarification on Membership Criterion
Another important clarification made by USCIS relates to the membership criterion, which assesses whether an individual has membership in associations that require outstanding achievements as a condition for admission. The updated policy specifies that USCIS will evaluate past memberships under this criterion, in addition to current memberships.
This change ensures that individuals who have held memberships in prestigious associations in the past can still include these achievements in their petitions, even if they are no longer members. The recognition of past memberships as valid evidence of extraordinary ability is an important clarification, as many individuals may have made significant contributions to their field during their membership, even if they are no longer active participants.
- Published Material Criterion Adjusted
The third area addressed by the new guidance concerns the criterion for published material. Previously, there was language suggesting that published material about an individual needed to demonstrate the value of the person’s work and contributions in order to satisfy this requirement. The new policy removes this language, clarifying that published material about an individual does not need to explicitly demonstrate the value of their work to meet the criterion.
This adjustment simplifies the process of submitting published material as evidence. Now, petitioners are not required to prove that the material about the individual directly highlights the significance of their work, as long as the material relates to the person’s achievements and recognition. This change may help petitioners more easily meet the published material requirement, as it removes the burden of needing to establish a direct link between the material and the value of the individual’s contributions.
- Non-Artistic Exhibitions and Comparable Evidence
The final clarification made by USCIS relates to the criterion concerning exhibitions. The previous guidance left some ambiguity regarding the types of exhibitions that could be submitted as evidence. According to the dictionary definition, an exhibition is a public display or showing, which could encompass a wide range of fields. However, the relevant regulation in this context modifies the term with “artistic,” indicating that only artistic exhibitions were to be considered.
The new policy guidance makes it clear that while the dictionary definition of an exhibition is broad, the regulation limits the scope to artistic exhibitions. Non-artistic exhibitions may still be considered, but only if they are part of a properly supported claim of comparable evidence. This change underscores the importance of submitting detailed and well-documented evidence when presenting non-artistic exhibitions as part of an extraordinary ability petition.
Previous EB-1 Policy Updates and Implications
The newly issued policy guidance builds on earlier updates that USCIS has made to the EB-1 extraordinary ability classification. These updates have been designed to bring more transparency and consistency to the adjudication process, ensuring that petitioners understand the types of evidence that will be considered and how they should be presented. By providing these clarifications, USCIS hopes to make the process more accessible to individuals seeking to demonstrate their extraordinary ability and to avoid confusion around the eligibility criteria.
The previous updates to the EB-1 policy had focused on providing clearer definitions for terms and criteria used in assessing extraordinary ability petitions. With this new update, the focus is on refining the evidence that may be submitted and the way USCIS evaluates certain types of achievements. By removing some of the ambiguities in the language and criteria, the USCIS aims to make it easier for petitioners to prepare their cases and submit the necessary evidence to demonstrate that they meet the qualifications for extraordinary ability.
Immediate Impact and Effectiveness
The new policy guidance is effective immediately, which means that it will apply to all pending and future petitions for individuals seeking EB-1 classification based on extraordinary ability. USCIS has also stated that the new guidance is controlling and supersedes any previous guidance related to the same topics. As a result, petitioners and attorneys should refer to the latest version of the USCIS Policy Manual when preparing and submitting their petitions.
According to USCIS, “this policy update is intended to provide clarity and transparency for individuals seeking EB-1 classification, as well as for those who represent them.” The update is expected to streamline the process for both petitioners and adjudicators, ensuring that petitions are evaluated based on clear and consistent criteria.
Petitioners are encouraged to carefully review the new guidelines and consider how they might apply to their specific cases. Those who are in the process of preparing their petitions may need to revisit the evidence they plan to submit to ensure it aligns with the updated criteria. For example, individuals who have received team awards or held memberships in the past can now include those achievements in their petitions with more confidence that they will be considered by USCIS.
For further details, individuals and attorneys can consult the updated USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2, which contains the full text of the new guidelines.
China’s Economic Imbalance, India’s Growth Potential, and Global Financial Reform
China’s economic challenges are deeply rooted in its suppression of consumer spending. Unlike the U.S., where household consumption constitutes roughly 70% of GDP, China’s consumption rates have hovered below 40%. Even during World War II, U.S. consumption was near 50%, showcasing a stark contrast. The limited consumer spending in China has forced the country to channel its resources elsewhere, often into infrastructure. However, after constructing more infrastructure in five years than the U.S. did throughout the 20th century, China has reached a point where further infrastructure investments have diminishing returns.
One significant issue China now faces is an overhang in its residential real estate market. The country has also heavily invested in export capacity, often through subsidies, which has raised concerns globally. This is a problem that requires a multilateral approach, as countries addressing it individually may not be as effective. For the global economy to move forward, China must shift towards a more balanced economy, with an increased focus on consumption-led growth. Although steps have been taken in that direction, how impactful and sustainable they will be remains uncertain.
When it comes to the import restrictions on Chinese goods, which are influenced by strategic considerations, there is an additional consequence of higher costs for consumers. The key question is whether a balance can be achieved between safeguarding national interests and keeping consumer prices in check. “It is very important, particularly when inflation has been a concern, to be very mindful of self-administered supply shocks,” the article suggests. It is essential to avoid dependence on single sources for critical supplies, particularly from China, especially in areas vital to national defense. At the same time, minimizing the cost of production inputs is equally important, as it helps curb inflation and improves the competitiveness of producers.
However, broad-based tariffs against China are not the right solution. The proposal for imposing large tariffs across the board is “almost completely misguided.” A more balanced approach would be to target protection only in cases justified by resilience, national security concerns, or to counteract China’s large subsidies. Imposing tariffs simply because China has reached a high level of competitiveness is counterproductive. Such actions would likely provoke retaliation from China and could negatively impact inflation and the purchasing power of workers.
Looking at India’s economic prospects, there is optimism about the country’s ability to seize opportunities in the global market. Over the next five to seven years, India is expected to experience substantial growth. “I am optimistic about India’s prospects to increase its GDP six-fold by the century of Independence and be the most rapidly growing economy in the world over the next five years, the next decade, and the next generation among major economies.” Prime Minister Narendra Modi has made significant strides in infrastructure development and has introduced various initiatives in both tangible and intangible sectors, such as payments systems and personal identification. The hope is that these efforts will continue, and that market forces will play a larger role in driving innovation and growth in the future.
Nevertheless, India faces several challenges. Geopolitical factors, including the growing alliance between China, Russia, and Iran, will require India to skillfully navigate its relationships, particularly as it strengthens ties with the U.S. The advent of artificial intelligence presents another challenge, as India must work hard to maintain its dominance in IT and digital sectors. Additionally, while India has made progress in opening up to globalization, there is still room for improvement. “The greatest barriers to India benefiting from globalization have been those put in place by the Indian government,” and further reduction of these barriers would allow India to reap even greater rewards.
The creation of jobs is another pressing issue for India. While it is already a substantial challenge, the problem is likely to become even more pronounced in the coming years. There is potential for job creation in both industry and manufacturing, but it is suspected that India’s success will largely depend on the growth of the service sector. As IT continues to expand globally, there will be more opportunities for job creation in this sector. Additionally, construction will play a critical role in job creation, as there is still much infrastructure development needed within India.
On the global stage, the reform of Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) is another critical issue. Efforts to reform these institutions, as presented by N.K. Singh and the author, have been met with enthusiasm by the World Bank and other institutions. However, while some progress has been made in accepting the recommendations, the true test will be in resource mobilization and implementation. “The rubber meets the road in terms of resource mobilization and implementation,” and it remains unclear whether the transformative changes envisioned by Singh and the author are yet underway.
As for the International Monetary Fund (IMF), it is time for a similar reform exercise. The resilience trust fund established post-COVID has only moved small amounts of resources to developing countries. There is a need for new mechanisms to support the global transition to a green economy. The IMF could draw inspiration from the system transformation facility that was implemented after the fall of the Berlin Wall. While the circumstances are different, both scenarios involve economies requiring long-term structural support. Furthermore, there has been a significant focus on increasing lending volumes from the World Bank, but less attention has been given to the IMF’s role in providing financial stability.
One key point is the financial capacity of the IMF. The article notes that “no one was worried that the IMF was under-reserved when the value of its gold stock was half of what it is today.” This suggests that the IMF’s financial capacity could be significantly expanded, allowing it to better insulate economies from external shocks. A facility like the one the IMF implemented during the oil shock period, which allowed countries in good standing to rapidly access financing, could be useful today. Such a facility would help countries respond to sudden changes in the global interest rate environment or commodity prices.
In conclusion, China’s economic future depends on a shift toward consumption-led growth, while India’s prospects appear bright if it can overcome geopolitical challenges and continue reforming. On the global front, reforming financial institutions like the World Bank and IMF will be crucial to supporting structural transformations and insulating economies from shocks.
User’s Gmail Inbox Mysteriously Empties: How Google Can Help Recover Missing Emails
For many people, achieving “inbox zero” feels like an impossible task, but imagine waking up to find that your entire Gmail inbox is empty. Not just no unread emails, but nothing at all—every email has disappeared. This is exactly what happened to one user who posted a plea for help on Google’s Gmail support forums, explaining that “all of my emails in my inbox are missing.” Initially fearing it might be a cyber attack, the user was understandably concerned. Fortunately, there are several possible explanations for such a situation, and not all of them point to hacking. If you find yourself in a similar scenario, here’s how Google might assist you in retrieving your lost Gmail messages.
Gmail User’s Panic: “All My Emails Are Gone!”
The user’s post, shared on September 28 on the Gmail support forum, detailed their alarming experience of checking their inbox only to discover that all their emails had mysteriously vanished. None of the emails were found in the trash, spam, archived folders, or any other alternate folder. The emails had simply disappeared. The user clarified, “My other Gmails have not been impacted. I am receiving messages as of a few minutes ago, but there’s no history in my inbox?”
Naturally, the first thoughts that crossed their mind were either a technical glitch or, worse, the possibility of having been hacked. While hacking seemed less likely given that they had two-factor authentication enabled, the situation was still worrying. Further adding to their concern was the fact that a supplier they worked with was experiencing a network outage and had been offline for a few days. This raised more questions: could the email disruption be related to this outage, or was there something else going on?
What Could Have Gone Wrong?
A diamond product expert—someone who actively helps out in Google’s support forums—responded to the user’s concern, offering reassurance that Google doesn’tdelete Gmail messages from active accounts unless they have been sent to the trash or spam folder. This rule is crucial because Google only permanently deletes emails that have been in the trash for 30 days. Additionally, for accounts that are unused for two years, Google reserves the right to delete them, but this scenario clearly didn’t apply to the user’s case, since the account was still active.
So, if Google isn’t to blame, what else could explain the disappearance of these emails? The expert offered some plausible explanations, including the possibility of filters, forwarding rules, authorized third-party apps, or even account compromise. “Hackers do, indeed, sometimes delete messages so as to cover their tracks,” the expert explained, referencing how hackers can remove Gmail security warnings that alert users about unauthorized access.
Here’s a breakdown of possible causes and solutions to recover lost emails in Gmail.
- Check if Emails Have Been Archived, Deleted, or Marked as Spam
One of the first things you should do is check if the missing emails have been archived, deleted, or sent to spam. Gmail’s search functionality is robust, and you can use it to track down specific emails even if they aren’t in your inbox. If you know details like the subject line or content of the missing email, you can use Gmail’s search bar to locate it. A particularly useful search operator is “in:anywhere,” which helps search for messages stored anywhere in Gmail, not just in your inbox.
- Look for Active Email Filters
Email filters are a common culprit when messages suddenly go missing from your inbox. Gmail allows users to create filters that can automatically archive, delete, or move emails based on specific criteria. Sometimes, users accidentally set filters without realizing the consequences. To check if a filter is responsible for your missing emails, go to the top right of your Gmail window, click on “Settings,” select “See All Settings,” and then navigate to “Filters and Blocked Addresses.” From there, you can review all the filters you have set up and modify or delete any that are affecting your emails.
- Verify Forwarding Settings
Another possible explanation for disappearing emails is forwarding rules. Gmail can be set up to automatically forward emails to another account, and sometimes users forget this has been configured. After forwarding, Gmail can archive or delete those messages, leading to the confusion of missing emails. To check your forwarding settings, click on “Settings,” then “See All Settings,” and go to the “Forwarding and POP/IMAP” section. If you see that your emails are being forwarded to an unfamiliar address, it’s possible your account has been compromised.
If you suspect unauthorized forwarding, it’s critical to disable the forwarding rule immediately and conduct a Google account security check-up. Google provides step-by-step instructions on what actions to take next if your account has been compromised, including updating your password and reviewing account activity for any signs of a security breach.
- Double-Check Third-Party Email Clients
In some cases, if you’re using an external email client (like Outlook or Apple Mail) to read your Gmail messages, there may be a setting in the client that is causing your Gmail emails to be deleted once they are downloaded to the app. This issue is similar to forwarding, but it’s specific to email clients that use the POP protocol, which can be configured to remove emails from the Gmail server after they are downloaded locally.
If this sounds like a potential cause, you should check your external email client’s settings to ensure it is not set up to delete messages from the server. While this may seem like a repetition of checking forwarding settings, it’s important to keep this possibility in mind, especially if you frequently use third-party apps to access your Gmail.
Stay Calm and Take Action
If you ever find yourself in the same position as this user, don’t panic. It’s essential to take immediate steps to investigate what might have gone wrong. While hacking is one possibility, there are several other common issues, such as forwarding rules, filters, or external email clients, that could explain why your emails are missing.
Google has built-in support to help users recover lost emails, and with the right approach, you may be able to locate and restore your emails. Searching through archived, deleted, or spam folders, reviewing forwarding settings, and conducting a security check-up are crucial first steps. If needed, Google support forums are also a valuable resource, where other users and experts can provide assistance, just like the one who helped the user on September 28.
In the end, Gmail offers several ways to protect your account and messages, but it’s up to users to stay vigilant and regularly review their account settings to prevent such incidents from occurring.
Cruise Bharat Mission Launched to Boost India’s Cruise Tourism Industry
The Union Minister of Ports, Shipping & Waterways, Sarbananda Sonowal, recently inaugurated the ‘Cruise Bharat Mission’ at Mumbai port, aiming to significantly enhance India’s cruise tourism sector. This ambitious initiative is poised to revitalize both sea and river cruise tourism in India, with an objective to double the number of cruise passengers by 2029.
The mission is centered on increasing the number of cruise passengers across India’s waterways, particularly focusing on attracting over 1.5 million river cruise tourists. India’s vast network of more than 5,000 kilometers of operational waterways offers considerable potential for development, which the mission seeks to tap into.
Highlighting the importance of this initiative, Sonowal described the launch of Cruise Bharat as a pivotal moment for India’s maritime tourism industry. He pointed out the significant opportunity the nation has to exploit the largely untapped Blue Economy, given its extensive coastline and network of waterways. The minister also acknowledged that this initiative aligns with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision of fostering growth through sustainable and world-class infrastructure in the maritime sector.
Phased Implementation of Cruise Bharat Mission
The Cruise Bharat Mission is set to be implemented in three phases, starting from October 1, 2024, and running until March 31, 2029. These phases will mark a series of developmental milestones aimed at expanding and modernizing India’s cruise tourism infrastructure.
– Phase 1 will prioritize research, master planning, and forging alliances with neighboring countries to improve cruise tourism connectivity. The phase will also focus on modernizing existing ports, marinas, and destinations to optimize India’s cruise circuits.
– Phase 2 is designed to build on the existing infrastructure by developing new marinas, cruise terminals, and tourist destinations. This phase seeks to enhance the country’s capacity to host more cruise routes and engage high-potential cruise sites.
– Phase 3 will continue expanding marinas, terminals, and destinations while focusing on the integration of all cruise circuits within the Indian Subcontinent, symbolizing a matured ecosystem. By the end of this phase, the mission aims to fully develop India’s cruise tourism infrastructure.
The targets for these phases include increasing the number of sea cruise passengers from 0.5 million in Phase 1 to 1 million by Phase 3. Similarly, the sea cruise calls, which currently stand at 125, will grow to 500 by the end of Phase 3. Additionally, river cruise passengers are expected to rise from 0.5 million to 1.5 million. International cruise terminals will also expand from the current two to 10, and river cruise terminals will grow from 50 to 100. In total, the mission is projected to generate around 400,000 new jobs within the cruise sector.
By 2047, the mission aims to increase sea cruise passengers to 5 million, marking a dramatic rise from the 460,000 passengers expected in 2024. Cruise calls, which are projected to increase to 500 by 2030, will further rise to 1,100 by 2047. These targets were reported by Business Standard, which emphasized the long-term scope and impact of the mission.
Cruise Tourism Segments
The Cruise Bharat Mission outlines three distinct segments within the cruise tourism industry:
- Ocean & Harbour Cruise: This segment includes ocean cruises, coastal and deep-sea trips, as well as yachting and sailing adventures originating from various harbors along India’s vast coastline.
- River & Inland Cruise: This segment targets river and inland waterways, offering cruises that explore India’s intricate network of canals, backwaters, creeks, and lakes. The potential to draw tourists to lesser-explored water routes presents significant opportunities for growth.
- Island Cruise: Focusing on boutique cruises and live-aboard experiences, this segment caters to those interested in exploring India’s islands. It offers excursions to hidden gems, lighthouse tours, and inter-island cruises, catering to a niche market of travelers seeking unique maritime experiences.
The Cruise Bharat Mission’s comprehensive approach aims to utilize India’s abundant natural maritime resources to boost tourism, generate employment, and stimulate the economy. By expanding the infrastructure and offering new and diverse cruise experiences, the mission will establish India as a major destination for cruise tourism on the global stage.
Sarbananda Sonowal emphasized that the mission is not only about promoting tourism but also about creating sustainable opportunities in the maritime sector. “Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, our focus is on building a robust cruise tourism infrastructure that supports both economic growth and job creation,” he said.
With a detailed roadmap and phased implementation, the Cruise Bharat Mission sets ambitious targets that reflect India’s commitment to growing its cruise tourism industry. The initiative is expected to position India as a premier destination for cruise travelers, while also contributing to the country’s broader economic development plans through its focus on sustainable growth and world-class infrastructure.
India Celebrates Historic Gold Wins at the 45th Chess Olympiad
Indian chess grandmaster R. Praggnanandhaa expressed immense joy after the Indian chess teams claimed gold medals at the 45th Chess Olympiad. Both the men’s and women’s teams triumphed, marking a significant moment in the history of Indian chess.
Reflecting on the win, Praggnanandhaa remarked, “Our goal in the Olympiad was to win the gold. This is a historic achievement. We are all very happy with the way we have played. For both men and women, winning the gold is a special experience.” His words encapsulated the pride and happiness of the entire Indian chess community following their victory.
The accomplishment is a testament to the hard work and dedication of the players. It also represents a turning point in Indian chess, showcasing the emerging talent and the country’s growing prominence in the global chess arena. Praggnanandhaa highlighted the collective effort that went into achieving this success, underscoring how the victory reflects the spirit of determination within Indian chess.
One of the standout moments for Praggnanandhaa during the event was meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Speaking about the experience, he shared, “Meeting PM Modi was a very good experience, and we had a conversation for over an hour. PM Modi was very gracious in giving us his time and he was answering all our questions and sharing his experiences.”
The interaction with the Prime Minister was a morale boost for the players. It emphasized the significance of their achievement on a national level. PM Modi’s recognition and encouragement not only uplifted the players but also underscored the importance of the team’s success. Praggnanandhaa’s experience with the Prime Minister helped further inspire the chess players, instilling a sense of pride that extended beyond personal accomplishment to national celebration.
India’s success at the Chess Olympiad is a proud moment for the country, as it reflects the growing popularity and interest in the sport. The gold medal victory is likely to inspire a new generation of chess enthusiasts in India, many of whom will look up to players like Praggnanandhaa and his teammates as role models.
India’s performance at the 45th Chess Olympiad marked a monumental achievement in the country’s chess history, with both the men’s and women’s teams securing gold medals. The Indian teams clinched two golds—one in the open category by the men’s team and one in the women’s category—further solidifying India’s growing reputation in the world of chess.
In the final rounds, India’s men’s team triumphed over Slovenia, while the women’s team overcame Azerbaijan to claim their respective titles. The men’s team dominated the Open section, winning 10 out of 11 matches, with one draw against the reigning champions, Team Uzbekistan. Their stellar performance placed them at the top of the table with 21 points. Meanwhile, the women’s team won 9 out of 11 matches, drawing one against Team USA and losing one to Team Poland. Despite the single loss, the women’s team also topped their section with 19 points.
These victories were not only a triumph for the teams but also for Indian chess as a whole. They demonstrated the depth of talent and the competitive strength of Indian players on the international stage. The wins also served as a reminder that Indian chess is rapidly advancing, with players who are capable of competing at the highest levels and achieving extraordinary results.
In addition to the team achievements, four individual players from India also won gold medals for their outstanding performances during the tournament. In the Open section, Gukesh D. on Board 1 and Arjun Erigaisi on Board 3 delivered brilliant performances, leading to individual gold medals. On the women’s side, Divya Deshmukh on Board 3 and Vantika Agrawal on Board 4 also earned gold medals for their exceptional play. Their individual successes added to India’s pride and demonstrated the strength and depth of the country’s chess talent.
The exceptional performances of these individuals further showcased India’s growing chess prowess. Gukesh D. and Arjun Erigaisi’s victories in the Open section were particularly significant, as they played crucial roles in securing the team’s success. Similarly, Divya Deshmukh and Vantika Agrawal’s achievements were instrumental in the women’s team’s victory, highlighting the strength and determination of Indian women in chess.
Praggnanandhaa’s reflections on the team’s success and his experiences at the Olympiad captured the spirit of Indian chess. The dedication of the players, the support from national leaders, and the sense of pride shared by the entire country contributed to making this victory a historic moment for India. The Chess Olympiad showcased not only the competitive spirit of Indian players but also their ability to rise to the challenge on the world stage and bring home gold.
The team’s success will undoubtedly inspire young chess players across India to pursue the game with passion and determination. The victory is a testament to the hard work and perseverance of the players, coaches, and the entire Indian chess community. With this achievement, Indian chess has firmly established itself as a force to be reckoned with in the global chess scene.
The historic wins at the 45th Chess Olympiad will remain a source of inspiration for years to come, motivating future generations of Indian chess players to aim for similar success on the international stage. As India continues to develop its chess talent and foster a culture of excellence in the sport, the achievements at this Olympiad serve as a powerful reminder of what is possible with dedication, teamwork, and national pride.
India’s triumph at the Chess Olympiad has set a new benchmark for future performances, and the players’ extraordinary achievements have earned them a place in the annals of Indian chess history. With growing support from national leaders and a new generation of chess enthusiasts inspired by their success, the future of Indian chess looks brighter than ever.
Surge in Whooping Cough Cases, New Flu Vaccine, and the Alcohol-Cancer Link: Key Health Updates
The AMA Update covers a wide range of health-related topics that affect physicians, residents, medical students, and patients. These topics span issues like COVID-19, burnout, vaccines, and more, with insights from experts in healthcare, from private practice leaders to public health officials.
Some pressing questions recently discussed include the effectiveness of the whooping cough vaccine, the possible link between alcohol and cancer, the name of the new flu vaccine, and what a challenge study for vaccine development entails.
In a recent AMA Update, Todd Unger, AMA’s Chief Experience Officer, discussed some of these crucial health issues with Andrea Garcia, JD, MPH, the Vice President of Science, Medicine, and Public Health at the AMA. Garcia provided detailed insights on the recent surge in whooping cough cases, the approval of a new flu vaccine, and the growing body of research connecting alcohol to cancer.
The Surge in Whooping Cough Cases
Unger started by addressing the topic of whooping cough, or pertussis, for the first time this year. Garcia noted that cases of whooping cough are on the rise. “The CDC reported on Friday that, according to preliminary data, cases of pertussis or whooping cough have more than quadrupled what they were at this point last year, with more than 14,000 infections to date. This is the highest number of whooping cough infections we’ve seen since 2014,” she stated.
One key concern is that the increase in cases shows no sign of slowing down. Whooping cough cases had significantly declined during the pandemic, likely due to COVID-19 mitigation measures. However, before the pandemic, pertussis cases had been on an upward trend.
Why Pertussis is Dangerous
Pertussis is a respiratory illness caused by bacteria that leads to severe, painful coughing fits. The illness gets its common name, whooping cough, because of the “whoop” sound patients make while trying to catch their breath after coughing. Garcia explained the severity of the condition, noting that in some cases, the coughing is so intense that it can cause vomiting or even broken ribs.
Although antibiotics can treat pertussis in its early stages, early diagnosis can be tricky because initial symptoms are similar to a common cold, such as a runny nose, sneezing, and low-grade fever. As Garcia pointed out, “By the time that deep cough develops, it’s too late, and the only treatment is comfort care with rest and fluids while the infection runs its course.”
The Importance of Vaccination Against Whooping Cough
Pertussis vaccines provide effective protection against the disease, but immunity wanes over time. Children receive five doses of the DTaP vaccine by age six, with a booster at age 11 to 12, and adults should get boosters every ten years. Pregnant individuals are recommended to get vaccinated between 27 and 36 weeks of pregnancy, which allows antibodies to pass to the newborn, protecting them before they’re eligible for their own vaccines.
Garcia mentioned that researchers are exploring new vaccines that could offer longer-lasting protection and reduce transmission. “On Friday, we saw the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee convene to hear from labs in Canada and the UK, as they presented their models for human challenge trials for pertussis,” she explained. These trials would involve intentionally exposing subjects to the infection, which could help test new vaccines. However, ethical concerns and doubts about the model’s ability to measure protection against severe disease were raised.
New Flu Vaccine Approved for Self-Administration
The conversation then shifted to the flu vaccine, with Unger asking about the latest developments. Garcia shared the news of the FDA’s approval of the first-ever flu vaccine that can be self-administered at home. “The vaccine itself, FluMist, isn’t new. It’s a nasal spray manufactured by AstraZeneca that has been used to protect against the flu in the U.S. for more than 20 years,” Garcia said. What’s new is that adults will now be able to administer the vaccine themselves at home, while children can receive it with the help of a caregiver. However, the self-administered version won’t be available until the next flu season.
When asked about the potential impact on flu vaccination rates, Garcia expressed cautious optimism. “Some physicians welcome more accessible options but don’t expect self-administration to significantly change vaccination rates. That said, Dr. Peter Marks from the FDA said it will provide greater convenience, flexibility, and accessibility for individuals and families.”
Despite the ease of access, flu vaccination rates in the U.S. have been declining, with only about half of adults and children receiving the vaccine last season. Garcia emphasized the importance of making vaccination more accessible to counteract this trend.
Alcohol and Cancer: A Growing Concern
Unger next brought up a recent report linking alcohol consumption to cancer, which made several headlines. Garcia explained that the report, released by the American Association for Cancer Research, highlights the risks associated with excessive alcohol consumption. “This new report says that alcohol may be one of the factors driving the trend of increasing cancer rates among adults under 50,” she said.
The report found that excessive alcohol consumption increases the risk of six types of cancer, including head and neck cancers, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, and stomach cancer. “We know that about 5.4% of cancers in the U.S., or just over one in 20 cancer diagnoses, were attributed to alcohol consumption in 2019,” Garcia noted.
She added that around 40% of cancer cases are associated with modifiable risk factors, including alcohol consumption, tobacco use, and diet. Reducing alcohol consumption, maintaining a healthy weight, and exercising can lower cancer risk.
Confusion Around Alcohol and Heart Health
There’s been confusion in recent years regarding the relationship between alcohol consumption and heart health. For years, moderate alcohol consumption was thought to have protective effects on heart health, but recent studies challenge that belief. Garcia pointed to a large study that followed 135,000 older British adults for more than a decade, which found that moderate drinkers did not experience a reduction in heart disease risk compared to occasional drinkers.
In fact, moderate and light drinkers showed higher rates of cancer deaths. Garcia noted that while many still believe in the benefits of moderate alcohol consumption, these potential benefits may not outweigh the cancer risks. “There are many ways to keep your heart healthy, and these potential benefits don’t really outweigh your cancer risks,” Garcia added.
Raising Awareness About the Risks
Addressing what can be done about these rising concerns, Garcia emphasized the need for public awareness campaigns and cancer-specific warning labels on alcohol. Studies show that many people, especially younger women, are unaware of the link between alcohol and cancer. Fewer than one-third of women aged 18 to 25, for example, knew that alcohol increases their risk of breast cancer.
While more research is needed to understand all the factors behind rising cancer rates, especially colorectal cancer, there’s a growing consensus that reducing alcohol consumption is a critical step in cancer prevention. “We need to raise awareness through public messaging campaigns and adding cancer-specific warning labels to alcoholic beverages,” Garcia concluded.
With the flu season approaching and concerns about cancer and whooping cough on the rise, staying informed about these health issues is essential.
During Press Conference In New York, AAPI Presents on Ways to Leverage Resources And Skills To Support Healthcare Initiatives In India And USA
During a historic Press Conference with nearly two dozen media persons from the electronic, print and visual media in attendance at the Indian Consulate in New York on a rainy Sunday evening, September 29, 2024 Dr. Satheesh Kathula, President of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) shared about his vision for AAPI under his leadership and about AAPI’s contributions to India and the United states during the past 43 years.
Dr. Kathula urged the media to be the link and a channel between AAPI and the larger community in sharing AAPI’s message and about the noble initiatives that benefit the Indian American community and the people back home in India. Expressing his gratitude to the media persons for their presence today and for the support they have provided over the past several decades to AAPI, Dr. Kathula urged their ongoing support “to help to get the message out, in reaching out to the general public here, the Indian diaspora and in India, especially for providing health education on preventive measures.
Dr. Kathula along with Dr. Hetal Gor, a member of the AAPI Board of Trustees, briefed the media on AAPI’s ongoing activities in the United States and India, and highlighted the upcoming Global Health Summit in New Delhi, scheduled for October 19th to 20th. This summit aims to bring together healthcare professionals, policymakers, and industry leaders to address the prevention of cancer and heart attacks in the Indian population with lifestyle modification and technology.
Dr. Kathula invited all the AAPI members to attend the next edition of AAPI’s annual Global Health Summit this October in New Delhi, with a focus on preventing cancer and heart attacks through lifestyle changes and technological advancements. AAPI has invited Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the President of India Honorable Droupadi Murmu to be the Honored Guests at GHS 2024 and to address the hundreds of AAPI delegates at the Summit. Hon. Health Minister J.P. Nadda has been invited and he has agreed to meet with AAPI delegates to formally to discuss the healthcare issues especially the prevention aspect of cancer and Heart attacks in India.
AAPI is planning to organize bone marrow drives across the nation, as the donor pool among South Asians is very limited, Dr. Kathula said. “So, we are trying to recruit potential donors in the stem cell or bone marrow transplant donations. Because people are getting affected by lymphomas and leukemias, and they need transplant. Since they do not get the matched donors in this country, we are trying to increase that pool,” he added.
As the President of AAPI, the largest ethnic medical organization, representing the interests of over 120,000 physicians of Indian origin, Dr. Kathula said, AAPI is also launching a program called “Million Miles of Gratitude,” to honor veterans by promoting physical activity, he said. Participants can log their walking or running miles, with each mile serving as a tribute to the veterans. The goal is to collectively reach a million miles in the coming year.
According to Dr. Kathula, AAPI is planning to introduce heart screenings for the Indian American community, as they are at higher risk of experiencing heart attacks at a younger age, and that this initiative will focus on prevention and early detection.
Earlier during the day, AAPI organized AAPI Leadership Retreat at the Indian Consulate in New York City and was graced by the presence of Hon. Consul General Binay Pradhan. The panel included several distinguished figures from various fields, including Dr. Sanjeev Kaul, Chief of Trauma; Sudeep Kapur, a magistrate; Manee Kamboji, owner of a highly successful IT company; Natalie McKenzie, a health and fitness coach and podcaster; Jyoti Soni, a catering and wedding planner with over three decades of experience in the culinary industry; and Dr. Satheesh Kathula, President of AAPI. The session was expertly moderated by Dr. Hetal Gor.
Consul General, Honorable Binay Pradhan, in his address highlighted his long association with AAPI from his past interactions with AAPI members. Highlighting the recent meetings India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with top CEOs from the United States during his recent visit, Pradhan emphasized that India’s potential is “not only appreciated by the ordinary people of the United States, but even by the industry, and that’s probably the reason why all these industry entities are now present in India in a much bigger way. So it’s going to be leading to bigger investment back within India.”
Pradhan lauded the contributions of “a strong Indian Association of Doctors, AAPI. We feel so lucky that we have their strong presence, of this fraternity in this country. And I’m sure, going forward, you are going to be an anchor. You will be bringing the relationship between India and the United States much closer, especially in the healthcare sector.”
Pradhan told AAPI that “My expectation, my request has been that, this is the time for you to rethink about how you contribute back home in India. I know all of you, individually and collectively, do a lot of good work back home in India. The economy of India is undergoing a massive transformation today. The Indian people are not looking for help in meeting their basic needs, but would expect a strong Association like yours to help them to touch their aspirations. You have access to the best of the medical technologies in this country. You can think about what you can do to touch the aspirations of the people, by using the technology, and reach a much larger number of people in India.”
AAPI is a forum to facilitate and enable Indian American Physicians to excel in patient care, teaching and research, and to pursue their aspirations in professional and community affairs. For more information on AAPI and its many programs, please visit: www.aapiusa.org
Religious Nationalism Under Fire at New York Events
This past weekend, the Federation of Indian American Christian Organizations of North America (FIACONA) was represented at two significant events in New York City, standing alongside activists, faith leaders, and civil society members to address religious nationalism and the persecution of religious minorities. On Friday, September 20, at 2 PM, an interfaith press conference took place during the Annual United Nations General Assembly. The event, held at 777 United Nations Plaza, was titled “The Scourge of Religious Nationalisms” and aimed to bring attention to the growing dangers posed by religious nationalism worldwide.
The press conference was organized under the banner of The Religious Nationalism Project (TRNP), a collaborative initiative designed to amplify diverse voices and raise awareness about the harm that religious nationalism inflicts on democratic societies. Speakers emphasized the threat posed by religious nationalism, which, they argued, undermines democracy by promoting divisive ideologies that distort religious teachings for political gain.
Several influential figures spoke at the event, including The Reverend Peter Cook, Executive Director of the New York State Council of Churches; The Reverend Neal Christie, Executive Director of FIACONA; Rabbi Barat Ellman from Rabbis for Ceasefire; The Reverend Chloe Breyer, Executive Director of the Interfaith Center of New York; Imam Saffet Catovic, Director of the UN Office of Justice for All; Sahar Alsahlani, Board Member of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)-NY; Nikhil Arur, an organizer from Hindus for Human Rights; and The Reverend Dr. Gideon Jebamani, Board Member of both FIACONA and the New York State Council of Churches.
Here are key excerpts from some of the speakers who highlighted FIACONA’s efforts in combating religious nationalism:
The Reverend Peter Cook
The Reverend Peter Cook, a Board Member of FIACONA and Executive Director of the New York State Council of Churches, emphasized the dangers posed by religious nationalism. He began by stating, “We address the scourge of religious nationalism as heads of state come to New York for the annual United Nations General Assembly.” Cook highlighted the broad coalition of faith groups and civil society organizations that had gathered to denounce the misuse of religion by governments and politicians to advance supremacist agendas.
Cook pointed out that governments often use religion to justify harmful policies. “We are also concerned about his [President Biden’s] tepid willingness to stand up to Narendra Modi and his Hindu nationalist cause, which twists the Hindu faith to justify genocidal actions and ethnocentric violence,” he said, criticizing the U.S. government for not doing enough to address the issue in India. He stressed that religious nationalism is a global problem, noting how various religions—including Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Judaism—can be weaponized to suppress religious minorities. “We reject all forms of religious nationalism, as they are anti-democratic and strip billions of people worldwide of their religious freedom,” Cook declared.
The Reverend Neal Christie
The Reverend Neal Christie, Executive Director of FIACONA and a principal of The Religious Nationalisms Project, gave a powerful address linking religious nationalism in India to broader global threats. He criticized Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for creating “a valley of despair for over 1.4 billion people,” by propagating a vision of a Hindu supremacist state. Christie highlighted the deepening oppression faced by India’s marginalized communities, including Dalits, Indigenous peoples, and religious minorities.
Christie referenced a significant legal precedent in India where the Supreme Court declared Lord Ram, a Hindu deity, as a “juristic person,” giving him legal standing in a property dispute over the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya. “Tell me, in what other secular democracy except India, has one God been determined to be a ‘juristic person,’ allowing him to claim ownership of land?” Christie asked. He further stressed the international ramifications of India’s slide toward religious nationalism, quoting Dr. Fernand de Varennes, former UN Special Rapporteur for Minorities, who warned that India is becoming a major global source of instability due to the systemic persecution of minorities.
Christie recounted alarming statistics from 2023, noting a rise in attacks on Christians in India, with religious nationalists targeting over 1,570 Christians and killing more than 200. “Hate crimes have justified the demolition of 300 churches and the extrajudicial arrests of thousands,” he said. Christie called on the United Nations to investigate these violations and to support religious and human rights organizations working on the frontlines. “Now is the time to create an independent multilateral Truth and Reparations commission to investigate the systemic harm inflicted on Christians and other religious minorities by the Indian government,” he urged.
Reverend Dr. Gideon Jebamani
Reverend Dr. Gideon Jebamani, a Dalit advocate and Board Member of FIACONA, spoke about the oppression of Dalit Christians in India, calling it a profound human rights violation. He described how religious nationalism marginalizes minority groups and denies them the right to practice their faith. “In India, religious nationalism excludes all minorities of other faith groups, denying their right to practice their beliefs,” Jebamani said, adding that critics of the government are labeled as “anti-social” or “terrorists” and jailed without trial.
Jebamani condemned the false accusations against Christians in states like Uttar Pradesh, where they are often jailed for allegedly converting others to Christianity. “This is the damage that religious nationalism brings to humanity,” he said. Jebamani called for a united effort to ensure that all people, regardless of their religious affiliation, have the freedom to practice their faith. “Together, let us raise our voices against any religious nationalist movement that seeks to strip away human dignity and freedom,” he concluded.
Pieter Friedrich
Journalist Pieter Friedrich, a Board Member of FIACONA, focused his remarks on the broader global implications of religious nationalism, highlighting the rise of Christian nationalism in the United States. “Here in America, one of our most pressing concerns is the rise of Christian nationalism,” Friedrich said, noting that while it has not yet fully achieved power, its growing influence is cause for alarm. He linked the U.S. experience to the rise of Hindu nationalism in India and Jewish nationalism in Israel, warning of a global trend toward theocratic authoritarianism.
Friedrich noted a recent conference in Washington, D.C., where leaders from Jewish, Christian, and Hindu nationalist movements gathered to forge alliances. “It was a confluence of Jewish, Christian, and Hindu nationalism that vividly illustrated how these movements are forming alliances with each other,” he said. Friedrich emphasized the need for people of faith to stand against the weaponization of religion for political gain. “Our call is to educate, agitate, and organize,” he said, urging those in attendance to continue raising awareness about the dangers of religious nationalism.
The speakers at the event sent a clear message: religious nationalism, in any form, is a threat to democracy and human rights. They called for global action to combat the rise of religious extremism and protect the freedoms of all people, regardless of their faith.
India’s Ambitious Drive to Become a Semiconductor Powerhouse
India, the world’s fifth-largest economy, has set its sights on becoming a global semiconductor leader. The country, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has laid out ambitious goals to boost its semiconductor sector, aiming to grow its electronics industry from $155 billion today to $500 billion by 2030. This target has generated a mix of skepticism and optimism, with experts highlighting both the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead.
Despite the high aspirations, there’s a consensus among industry insiders that India cannot achieve this milestone alone. Eri Ikeda, an assistant professor at the Department of Management Studies at the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, noted that while the pace of progress is promising, the country is essentially starting from scratch. “While the speed of development seems to be fast and the momentum is there, India has just started to embark on the semiconductor industry development from scratch,” she said.
Globally, Taiwan is the leading chipmaker, holding 44% of the market share, followed by China with 28%, South Korea at 12%, the U.S. with 6%, and Japan at 2%, according to data from Taiwanese consultancy Trendforce. For India to compete at this level, collaboration with established industry leaders is crucial.
Rishi Bhatnagar, chair of the Institution of Engineering and Technology’s future tech panel, pointed out that partnerships with international companies are key to India’s success. He referenced Taiwan’s Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation working with Tata Electronics to establish India’s first 12-inch wafer fabrication plant in Gujarat. Additionally, American chipmaker Micron Technology is expected to produce India’s first semiconductor chip by 2025. Last week, U.S. chipmaker Analog Devices and Tata Group signed an agreement to explore semiconductor product development in India. “These examples show that collaboration is necessary,” Bhatnagar emphasized.
Learning from China
India is increasingly seen as a potential alternative to China for companies looking to diversify their supply chains. However, analysts caution that India must first master the complexities of semiconductor manufacturing, as its industry is still in its infancy. Despite this, China remains India’s top trading partner, with bilateral trade between the two nations reaching $118.4 billion in financial year 2024. India’s imports of telecom and smartphone components from China amounted to $4.2 billion, data from the Ministry of External Affairs showed.
Bhatnagar acknowledged the gap between India and China in terms of semiconductor manufacturing but expressed optimism about India’s ability to catch up. “India is far behind China in semiconductor manufacturing. Although India may be able to run fast and catch up, China will be running faster,” he remarked, adding that collaboration between the two countries is essential.
Even China, which is striving to keep up with Taiwan’s TSMC and other semiconductor giants, has been scaling up its industry by importing vast amounts of equipment from the U.S. and Japan, Ikeda noted. She highlighted that India should learn from China’s experience as it builds its semiconductor sector.
Strengthening U.S. Ties
India’s semiconductor ambitions align with its strategy to deepen ties with the U.S., as both countries aim to counterbalance China’s dominance. In September, the U.S. Department of State announced a partnership with the India Semiconductor Mission and the country’s electronics and IT ministry to enhance the global semiconductor value chain. This move came shortly before the Biden administration imposed new export controls on critical technologies, including semiconductor goods, aimed at limiting China’s progress in AI and computing.
For the U.S., collaborating with India offers an opportunity to diversify its chip supply sources, reducing dependence on Taiwan. Bhatnagar pointed out the strategic advantages of the partnership. “They’re investing in a democratically elected country with a legal framework and a growing number of English speakers. So when two democracies are talking, that’s a very different kind of discussion. And we need to accept and agree this is needed when global scenarios are changing,” he said.
Indian Prime Minister Modi’s recent meetings with tech CEOs, including Nvidia’s Jensen Huang and Google’s Sundar Pichai, have further underscored the country’s growing importance in the global tech landscape. Huang described this as “India’s moment” and pledged to work closely with the nation. Leaders of other semiconductor firms, such as GlobalFoundries’ Thomas Caulfield and AMD’s Lisa Su, were also part of the discussions.
Analysts suggest that India’s focus on semiconductors could bolster U.S. standing in its “chip war” with China. Ikeda remarked that India’s willingness to attract both U.S. and Chinese investments could ultimately position the country as a competitor to these global giants if its efforts are successful. However, she cautioned that India faces significant challenges, particularly in terms of infrastructure and investment.
India’s Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal echoed these sentiments, acknowledging the country’s early stage in semiconductor development. “We are encouraging [the] semiconductor industry in a big way. We started building up the ecosystem, which is essential before we can see more and more foundries coming into the country to the actual chip making,” Goyal said.
India’s Advantages
While India has a long way to go before it becomes a semiconductor powerhouse, it does have several advantages. One of the most significant is its low labor costs, which make the country an attractive option for companies seeking to reduce their dependence on China. In New Delhi, the monthly minimum wage for skilled workers is 21,215 Indian rupees ($253.85), compared to 2,420 yuan ($344.30) in Beijing. Minimum wages vary across states and provinces in both countries, but the general cost difference is significant.
Ikeda believes that if India can improve its technological capabilities and offer competitively priced products, it could gain an edge over China. “If India can become more technologically advanced and cater to the global demand with cheaper and fair quality products, it will have a competitive advantage over China,” she said.
With its growing population and potential to become the world’s second-largest economy by 2075, according to Goldman Sachs, India has already attracted major tech investors like Apple and Google. Tarun Pathak, research director at Counterpoint Research, noted that Apple is now exporting more products from India than it sells domestically. “It’s huge domestic market and young nation that gives India an edge,” Pathak added.
India’s progress in infrastructure development is also expected to bolster its semiconductor ambitions. In the interim budget for 2025, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman estimated that capital expenditure would rise by 11.1% to 11.11 trillion rupees ($133.9 billion), with a focus on railways and airports. This infrastructure will be crucial for supporting the country’s semiconductor supply chain. Bhatnagar highlighted that the semiconductor industry’s needs are unique, as chips are small items that can be transported efficiently by air rather than requiring large cargo ships.
As demand for semiconductors continues to rise globally, India is positioning itself as a solution for companies looking to cut costs and meet growing needs. Samir Kapadia, CEO of India Index, expressed confidence in India’s ability to reach its semiconductor goals. “I would not bet against India. When you look around the world, there are very few places where you can see the right kind of infrastructure, economics, stability and workforce to actually achieve this goal,” he said.
Macron Backs India’s Bid for Permanent Seat on Reformed UN Security Council
French President Emmanuel Macron has thrown his weight behind India’s push for a permanent position in a reformed United Nations Security Council (UNSC). In addition to India, Macron also endorsed Germany, Japan, Brazil, and two African nations for permanent membership.
“Germany, Japan, India, and Brazil should be permanent members, as well as two countries that Africa would designate to represent it. New elected members should also be admitted,” Macron stated. He was speaking at the general debate of the 79th session of the UN General Assembly in New York early Thursday morning, according to India’s time zone.
Macron’s address highlighted his strong stance on the need for reform within the UN system, particularly concerning the Security Council. His reasoning centered around making the council more effective and more representative of the global landscape.
“The United Nations should not be discarded, but rather reformed to reflect today’s realities,” he emphasized. Macron pointed out that the existing structure of the Security Council, often gridlocked by competing interests of its members, was no longer fit for purpose.
“Is there a better system? I don’t think so. So let’s just make these United Nations more effective, first by perhaps making them more representative. That is why France, and I repeat here, is in favour of the Security Council being expanded,” Macron explained.
He expanded on the idea by expressing hope that a reformed Security Council would lead to changes in its working methods. These changes, he suggested, could include limitations on the use of veto power in cases of mass atrocities and ensuring that the council’s decisions are focused on maintaining global peace and security.
Macron’s vision for a reformed council also touches on the need for more operational decision-making processes, which he believes are essential for the council to effectively fulfill its mandate in today’s world. “This is what we must have the courage and audacity to do, and that we must carry forward with the current permanent members,” he urged.
India’s bid for a permanent seat has garnered significant international support over recent years. Chilean President Gabriel Boric Font joined Macron in advocating for India’s inclusion, proposing a concrete timeline for reform. He suggested aligning the restructuring of the UNSC with the 80th anniversary of the UN, signaling the urgency of addressing the council’s outdated structure.
US President Joe Biden is another notable leader who has voiced strong support for India’s candidacy. During his recent bilateral meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Biden reiterated the United States’ full backing of India’s bid for a permanent seat in the Security Council. The Biden administration views India as a key player in the international system and has frequently mentioned its support for India’s increased role in global governance.
Russia, a long-time ally of India, has also continued to endorse India’s aspirations. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, during the ongoing UN General Assembly discussions, reiterated Moscow’s stance. He emphasized the need for greater representation of developing countries on the council, which includes countries like India, as crucial to making the UN body more equitable and effective.
The growing international consensus on the need for reform has been driven by calls for the Security Council to better reflect the contemporary global order. The current structure, which grants permanent seats to five countries – the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, and China – reflects a post-World War II reality that many argue is no longer representative of today’s geopolitical dynamics.
Countries like India, which has the world’s largest population and is one of the fastest-growing major economies, have repeatedly highlighted that the UNSC’s composition is outdated. India’s leaders argue that without more inclusivity and representation, the council risks losing legitimacy in the eyes of the international community.
Biden’s administration, along with other major world powers, appears to agree with the need for a more inclusive council. In his speech, Macron echoed this sentiment, stating that reforming the Security Council would be a necessary step toward making the UN more effective in its mission to maintain international peace and security.
While Macron’s support adds significant weight to India’s candidacy, the path to reforming the UNSC is far from straightforward. Changing the structure of the council would require the agreement of two-thirds of the UN member states, including the current five permanent members. Any one of these five, including China, could veto any proposal for reform. China has historically been less enthusiastic about expanding the council, particularly in ways that might reduce its own influence.
Despite these challenges, the momentum for change appears to be growing. With France, the US, and Russia all backing India’s inclusion, along with Germany, Japan, and Brazil, the push for reform is entering a critical phase. Macron’s call to limit veto powers in cases of mass atrocities may resonate with some current permanent members, who have been criticized for their use of vetoes in situations like the Syrian civil war, where humanitarian crises unfolded while the Security Council remained deadlocked.
As the UN approaches its 80th anniversary, there is increasing pressure from many corners of the world to make the body more representative of the current global power balance. Macron’s call to action reflects a widespread desire for the UN to evolve in order to stay relevant in addressing today’s challenges.
The UNSC, established in 1945, was designed to maintain international peace and security, but critics argue that it has become ineffective due to the competing interests of its permanent members. Calls for reform have grown louder as the world faces new global threats, including climate change, terrorism, and cyber warfare, which require coordinated international responses.
India, a country with significant geopolitical influence, has positioned itself as a strong candidate for permanent membership. Its participation in peacekeeping missions, commitment to multilateralism, and growing economic power make it an appealing choice for those advocating for a more balanced global governance system.
The reform of the UNSC remains a complex and politically charged issue, but the increasing chorus of world leaders advocating for change could signal a shift in the international community’s approach to global governance. The next few years may see renewed efforts to bring the Security Council in line with modern realities, potentially ushering in a new era of international cooperation.
Macron’s endorsement of India, along with the backing of several other key global leaders, marks a significant step toward the long-discussed reforms of the UN Security Council. However, the road ahead will likely be fraught with diplomatic negotiations, as the current permanent members weigh their interests against the growing calls for a more inclusive and representative council.
Concerns Rise as India Tightens Restrictions on Overseas Citizens
The Consulate General of India in New York has recently issued a clarification regarding the status of Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) cardholders. Contrary to circulating news reports, the consulate emphasized that no changes have been made to the rules concerning OCI cardholders. In a post on X (formerly known as Twitter), the office stated, “We have come across news reports spreading false information that restrictions have been placed on OCI card holders in the recent past. Friends in the Indian American community are hereby informed that no new change has been introduced in the recent past for OCI card holders.”
The Consulate General also referenced a Gazette notification from March 4, 2021, explaining that the current rules, particularly concerning OCI cardholders’ rights, remain intact. They provided a link to the FAQ page for additional clarification, underscoring that the Indian diaspora, which numbers around 32 million globally, has nothing to worry about with respect to recent rule changes. However, despite these assurances, concerns have been raised by many in the diaspora, expressing that they feel certain privileges they once enjoyed are being lost.
The recent wave of confusion stems from modifications made to OCI cardholder regulations that were introduced by India’s Home Ministry in early 2021. These changes have been seen as a tightening of controls on activities carried out by OCI cardholders, which now classify them more strictly as foreign nationals. This shift affects various areas, including travel, business, and religious activities, marking a departure from the more lenient rules that had been in place previously.
A key update is that OCI cardholders must now obtain permits for numerous activities that were once more accessible. For instance, traveling to restricted regions such as Jammu & Kashmir, Arunachal Pradesh, and other northeastern areas requires special permission. Under the new regulations, OCI cardholders are now regarded as foreign nationals, as the Ministry clarified, “The OCI Cardholder (including a PIO cardholder) is a foreign national holding a passport of a foreign country and is not a citizen of India.”
This formal recognition of OCI cardholders as foreign nationals fundamentally changes their legal standing in India. Previously, these individuals enjoyed many rights and privileges akin to Indian citizens, but the revised regulations introduce stricter limitations. George Abraham, vice chair of the Indian Overseas Congress, expressed his disappointment with the changes, saying, “This is really a setback for OCI cardholders and the Indian diaspora. We always felt as though we were moving towards dual citizenship, but now the government is saying it will treat us like foreigners.”
One of the most notable restrictions involves religious activities. The regulations require OCI cardholders to obtain special permission for activities such as missionary work, journalism, and certain religious functions, particularly those linked to promoting Islamic agendas, referred to as “Tabligh.” Additionally, activities like mountaineering and accessing certain restricted areas now need formal government approval. These areas include parts of Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, and several other states, which are geopolitically sensitive or require permits for foreign nationals to enter.
Further restrictions have been imposed on inter-country adoptions by OCI cardholders, and the requirements for pursuing higher education in India have also become more stringent. OCI cardholders residing in India are now required to report any changes in their residential address or occupation to the Foreigners Regional Registration Officer (FRRO) via email.
Despite these stricter controls, the Indian government has introduced a few minor concessions. For example, OCI cardholders will now pay the same fees as Indian citizens for entry to national parks, museums, historical monuments, and for domestic flights. However, these changes are seen as relatively insignificant in the face of the broader, more restrictive measures.
Thomas Abraham, chairman of the Global Organization of People of Indian Origin, voiced his concerns about the implications for the business community. He highlighted that the new regulations place additional bureaucratic hurdles on OCI cardholders wishing to conduct business in India. “The regulations are burdensome for OCI cardholders wishing to do business in India,” he said. Under the new classification as foreign nationals, OCI cardholders are subject to more stringent processes, including the need for permits and licenses that could obstruct business operations. Abraham added that these regulations complicate the real estate market, where diaspora investment has played a significant role. Previously, OCI cardholders could buy and sell property with relative ease, but the new rules require them to obtain special permission from the Reserve Bank of India for property transactions.
Furthermore, the restrictions on purchasing agricultural land remain unchanged, with foreign nationals, including OCI cardholders, still prohibited from owning such land. George Abraham remarked, “This sends a negative message. It is not a step forward in reclaiming the Indian diaspora to engage with India’s development.”
Beyond business and real estate, concerns about religious freedom have also arisen. Abraham mentioned that the restrictions could impact minority communities. “If you go to a church while visiting India, you could be accused of doing missionary activity,” he said, adding that similar limitations apply to Muslims as well.
The new rules have also caused alarm among journalists, particularly those covering critical stories about India. Abraham warned that OCI journalists could face repercussions for their work. “If you write an article critical of India, you may never be allowed to return,” he said, reflecting concerns that the regulations could be a move to shield the government from external criticism, especially in light of global attention on issues like the large-scale farmer protests.
There is also speculation that these changes may align with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s broader political agenda. Some observers suggest that these new rules reflect the influence of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a right-wing Hindu nationalist organization. George Abraham said, “This government is not upholding the values of the Indian constitution. It is not consistent with the democracy we are so proud of.”
Business leaders in the Indian American community share concerns about the potential negative impact on diaspora engagement. The complex bureaucratic procedures required for business activities in India could deter future investments. Moreover, the real estate sector may experience significant challenges due to the new regulations and the Supreme Court ruling, which now mandates that any non-Indian citizen must seek permission from the Reserve Bank of India for property transactions. As Thomas Abraham noted, “This will create problems for India’s real estate industry. If there are hurdles here, we will just pack up and go elsewhere.”
With the new regulations now in effect, the Indian government faces growing criticism from the diaspora, particularly those with deep connections to their homeland. Many in the Indian community worry that these rules will significantly impact their ability to engage economically, socially, and culturally with India. While the long-term effects remain uncertain, the overall sentiment is one of concern, with many feeling that the Indian government may be moving in the wrong direction.
297 Indian Antiquities to Return from U.S. Following Diplomatic Efforts
India is set to welcome back 297 antiquities from the United States after months of investigation and negotiation. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) revealed that these precious items, many of which were either stolen or illegally trafficked out of India, will soon be returned. This development coincided with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s three-day visit to the U.S. from 21 to 24 September. During this visit, the U.S. took steps to facilitate the return of these cultural treasures.
In an official statement released by the MEA on Sunday, it was announced that “in a symbolic handing over, a select few pieces were showcased to the prime minister and President Biden on the sidelines of their bilateral meeting in Wilmington, Delaware.” The symbolic gesture marked the beginning of a complex and meticulous process to bring these antiquities back to India.
Recovering antiquities is a lengthy and intricate process, requiring detailed documentation and coordination between various authorities. According to Dr. Sanjib Kumar Singh, a senior archaeologist and museologist at the National Museum in New Delhi, the process involves thorough collaboration between Indian consulates and U.S. authorities. He explained, “The embassy or consulate starts negotiations, on the advice of the Archaeological Survey of India, to share documents and photos pertaining to antiquity, to prove how the object belongs to our country. This is followed by discussions. Then, the antiquities are returned.”
The collection of antiquities being returned is a diverse array of items. Some were originally housed in the Metropolitan Museum of Art (Met) in New York, while others were confiscated by U.S. authorities and had been in the possession of the New York Attorney General’s office. Modi expressed his appreciation for this development, writing on social media platform X, “Deepening cultural connect and strengthening the fight against illicit trafficking of cultural properties.”
Antiquities Dating Back 4,000 Years
The antiquities being returned to India span a remarkable time period of nearly 4,000 years, ranging from 2000 BCE to 1900 CE. The items have origins from various regions across India, with most being terracotta artifacts from the eastern parts of the country. The collection also includes items made from stone, metal, wood, and ivory.
A significant part of the antiquities recovered in the U.S. can be traced back to Subhash Kapoor, a notorious figure in the art trafficking world. Kapoor, who operated an art gallery in the U.S., was implicated in the trafficking of over 2,500 antiquities. From 2011 to 2022, U.S. Homeland Security and the New York District Attorney’s office conducted investigations that led to the recovery of these artifacts, which were valued at over $143 million. Of the 2,500 items recovered, 307 pieces, estimated to be worth $4 million, are now slated for return to India.
Some of the most remarkable pieces in this collection include an apsara (celestial being) carved in sandstone from central India, dating back to the 10th or 11th century CE, a bronze Jain Tirthankar from central India dating to the 15th or 16th century CE, and a bronze statue of the Hindu deity Vishnu from eastern India, crafted between the 17th and 18th centuries CE.
Additionally, a number of items from this group had been part of the Met’s collection. In 2023, the museum announced that it would return 15 significant pieces to India. Among them are a terracotta sculpture of a yakshi (a female spirit associated with fertility) from 1st century BCE West Bengal, a bronze sculpture depicting the god Revanta returning from a hunt, crafted in the 10th century CE, and a 15th-century parikara (backplate). The director of the Met, Max Hollein, noted in a statement, “Last month, in light of new provenance information, we returned 16 works to India, including the celestial dancer, a sculpture that enraptured visitors for decades.”
These items, now formally handed over, are part of the total 297 antiquities being returned to India as a result of the efforts by U.S. and Indian authorities.
### The Process of Returning Antiquities
The return of stolen or trafficked cultural artifacts is governed by India’s Antiquities and Art Treasures Act of 1972. This act provides the legal framework for the identification, registration, and accession of cultural objects. Proper identification and accession—whereby each item is assigned a unique number for permanent storage and cataloging—are critical to ensuring the security and preservation of these historical treasures.
However, recovering these artifacts from overseas markets or museums is often complicated by the significant time lapse between when an item is stolen and when it reappears in foreign collections. Smugglers tend to target culturally unique or region-specific objects that hold both high monetary value and deep cultural significance. Statues of deities like yoginis, or items like ancient temple artifacts, are often the most sought after by traffickers.
According to Sanjib Kumar, spokesperson for the National Museum, New Delhi, “These smugglers often target objects which cannot be found outside of India, or are unique to the region, like yogini, or statues of various gods. These become extremely valuable, both in terms of their monetary worth and cultural significance.”
While many stolen artifacts remain at large, the return of these 297 antiquities represents a significant diplomatic and cultural achievement. “The return of antiquities is of course part of diplomacy, but, either way, it is a great moment for India’s cultural heritage,” Kumar added.
This diplomatic success highlights not only the importance of international cooperation in protecting cultural heritage but also the ongoing efforts by the Indian government to retrieve and preserve its stolen antiquities. Thanks to these initiatives, a significant portion of India’s cultural legacy will be restored, allowing future generations to experience and appreciate the artistic and historical treasures of the country.
Modi Wraps Up US Visit Without Meeting Trump, Despite Earlier Claims
Prime Minister Narendra Modi concluded his three-day official visit to the United States, notably avoiding a meeting with former President Donald Trump, despite the latter’s public announcement of such a meeting. Trump had claimed at a rally in Flint, Michigan, that Modi would join him, but this encounter did not materialize.
According to Fox News, Modi was expected to attend Trump’s rally on Long Island on Sunday, yet despite Trump’s comments, Indian officials had dismissed the possibility of such a meeting even before Modi left for the U.S. Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri confirmed that there was no “specific meeting at present” planned with the former President.
Throughout his U.S. visit, Modi participated in several high-profile events. He attended the Quad Leaders’ Summit in Wilmington, addressed a large gathering of Indian-Americans on Long Island, met with U.S. technology leaders, and spoke at the United Nations’ Summit of the Future on Monday. Additionally, Modi held bilateral meetings with world leaders on each of the three days of his visit. However, despite the political significance of this trip, Modi chose not to meet either of the U.S. presidential candidates—Vice President Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.
The decision not to meet Trump raised eyebrows, particularly after Trump claimed at a rally that Modi, his “fantastic friend,” would be coming to the U.S. specifically to see him. “He’s fantastic. I mean, fantastic, man. A lot of these leaders are fantastic,” Trump told supporters during the town hall event in Flint, Michigan, just days before Modi’s visit.
Modi Declines to Reignite ‘Abki Baar, Trump Sarkar’
This recent decision stands in stark contrast to Modi’s previous engagements with Trump, where he had, in subtle ways, endorsed Trump’s re-election. During Trump’s presidency, Modi demonstrated a strong camaraderie with him, and the two leaders were often portrayed as having a solid personal bond, underscored by shared political ideologies. Both had been vocal about policies aimed at bolstering their respective countries’ self-reliance, with Modi’s “Make in India” campaign drawing parallels to Trump’s “America First” approach.
The friendship between the two became a focal point in global media, particularly during the 2019 “Howdy, Modi” rally in Houston. At the time, Trump was seeking a second term as president, and Modi, as a foreign leader, shared the stage with him at an event attended by 50,000 Indian-Americans, a crucial voter demographic for Trump. It was at this event that Modi famously said, “Abki Baar, Trump Sarkar,” which loosely translates to “This time, it’s Trump’s government,” a statement seen by many as an endorsement of Trump’s re-election campaign.
Modi’s enthusiastic participation in the “Howdy, Modi” rally had a significant impact, particularly among Indian-American voters, many of whom tend to lean Republican. Trump capitalized on this moment, portraying himself as a strong ally of the Indian community in the U.S.
In February 2020, Modi hosted Trump for the “Namaste Trump” event in Ahmedabad, India, where over 100,000 people gathered to welcome the American president. This grand reception further reinforced the idea that the two leaders shared a close bond, and it was widely seen as a strategic move to boost Trump’s appeal among Indian-American voters during his re-election campaign.
However, this year, there was a noticeable absence of similar support or endorsement from Modi. While Trump had publicly expressed expectations of a meeting, Modi’s decision to avoid such an encounter suggests a deliberate move to distance himself from the former president, particularly as the U.S. political landscape shifts ahead of the 2024 election.
Despite the close rapport they had shared in the past, Modi’s decision not to meet Trump or endorse him this time could reflect a shift in India’s foreign policy approach. As the U.S. gears up for another highly charged election, Modi may be seeking to maintain neutrality or avoid appearing to favor one candidate over another. This could also signal India’s broader strategy of focusing on strengthening ties with the current U.S. administration and other global leaders, rather than becoming entangled in American electoral politics.
By refraining from repeating the “Abki Baar, Trump Sarkar” slogan or attending a rally with Trump, Modi has shown a more cautious approach, likely aimed at preserving India’s diplomatic flexibility. While the earlier endorsements helped to solidify India’s ties with Trump during his presidency, the political climate has since changed, and Modi may be recalibrating his approach accordingly.
In contrast to the past, where personal rapport between leaders took center stage, this visit demonstrated Modi’s emphasis on formal bilateral relations and multilateral engagements. His meetings with U.S. tech leaders, participation in the Quad Leaders’ Summit, and address at the U.N. Summit of the Future highlight India’s growing global role. By choosing to focus on these aspects of the visit, rather than rekindling a personal alliance with Trump, Modi underscored India’s priorities in a rapidly changing international order.
The lack of a meeting with Trump, despite the latter’s anticipation, sends a clear signal that India is focused on its broader foreign policy agenda, rather than being swayed by the dynamics of U.S. domestic politics. It also reflects a shift in the nature of diplomacy, where leaders may prefer to focus on long-term strategic partnerships rather than short-term political alignments.
Ultimately, Modi’s visit to the U.S. highlighted India’s increasing influence on the world stage, while his decision to skip a meeting with Trump marked a significant departure from the past. Whether this decision will have any impact on Trump’s re-election efforts remains to be seen, but it certainly underscores India’s cautious and calculated approach to international relations in an era of global uncertainty.
Modi Pushes for Human-Centric Global Governance at UN Summit of the Future
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi took center stage at the United Nations’ ‘Summit of the Future’ in New York on September 23, 2024, presenting India’s vision for global governance reform and sustainable development. The theme of the Summit, “Multilateral Solutions for a Better Tomorrow,” attracted world leaders from across the globe, all seeking to address the shared challenges of today while creating pathways for a more sustainable and equitable future.
During his speech, Prime Minister Modi underscored India’s commitment to promoting peace, development, and prosperity on the global stage. Representing one-sixth of the world’s population, Modi emphasized the importance of a people-first approach to global governance. “When we are discussing Global Future, we must accord the highest priority to a Human-centric approach,” Modi said, reflecting India’s focus on inclusive development and collective progress. This focus, he suggested, is not just theoretical; India’s recent achievements in poverty reduction provide concrete evidence. Over the past decade, the country has lifted 250 million people out of poverty, a significant achievement Modi proudly cited as proof that sustainable development is possible. “We have demonstrated that Sustainable Development can be Successful,” he declared.
Modi’s speech also reflected India’s broader global role, particularly in relation to nations in the Global South. He offered India’s development experiences as a template for other countries, emphasizing the importance of sharing knowledge and technology in addressing common global challenges. Modi noted how India’s progress in digital public infrastructure could serve as a model for broader global application. This infrastructure, according to Modi, has empowered millions and improved governance in India, and he called for these tools to be made accessible worldwide, especially in developing countries.
Solidarity with the Global South was a recurring theme in Modi’s address, as he underscored India’s willingness to share its experiences and technological advancements for the global good. In his view, collective strength—not military might—is what will drive humanity forward. “Success of Humanity lies in our collective strength, not in the battlefield,” Modi proclaimed, urging for collaboration over conflict in addressing global issues.
The Indian Prime Minister also took the opportunity to call for urgent reforms in global governance institutions, with a particular emphasis on the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). The need for reform, he argued, is crucial to maintaining the relevance of these institutions in an ever-changing global landscape. “Reform is the key to relevance,” Modi stated, pointing out that the current global governance structure has failed to keep pace with emerging challenges, especially in areas such as terrorism and cybersecurity. According to him, the UNSC needs to evolve to better represent today’s geopolitical realities and to be more responsive to the needs and concerns of the world’s population, particularly in regions that are currently underrepresented.
As part of his broader push for reform, Modi also highlighted the necessity for more balanced global regulations on technology. In a world increasingly dependent on digital solutions, he warned against the misuse of technology as a means of division and control. “Digital Public Infrastructure should be a Bridge, not a Barrier,” Modi said, advocating for a more inclusive and equitable approach to technology development and governance. He cautioned against the monopolization of digital infrastructure by a few nations or corporations and called for global standards that would allow for fair access to technology, especially in developing countries.
Modi’s vision for the future was deeply rooted in India’s guiding principle of “One Earth, One Family, One Future,” which was reflected throughout his speech. This idea, Modi explained, is a cornerstone of India’s approach to global challenges, particularly in the areas of health and climate change. He pointed to initiatives like “One Earth, One Health” and “One Sun, One World, One Grid” as examples of how India is working to bring nations together in addressing common global challenges. “One Earth, One Health” promotes a holistic approach to global healthcare, focusing on the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health, while “One Sun, One World, One Grid” seeks to create a global solar power grid that can share renewable energy across borders.
Modi’s call for collective global action came at a time when the world is grappling with multiple overlapping crises, from climate change and pandemics to economic inequality and technological disruptions. For Modi, addressing these challenges requires not only the reform of global institutions but also a fundamental shift in how countries work together. By promoting multilateralism and emphasizing shared responsibility, he envisions a future where global action matches global ambition, particularly in the face of rising threats such as terrorism, climate change, and cyber warfare.
The Summit of the Future concluded with the adoption of a critical outcome document titled “A Pact for the Future.” This document outlines a roadmap for achieving a more equitable and sustainable world by strengthening multilateralism and promoting cooperation across borders. The Pact is accompanied by several key annexes, including the Global Digital Compact and a Declaration on Future Generations. The Global Digital Compact focuses on creating international standards for digital governance that ensure technology benefits all of humanity, while the Declaration on Future Generations aims to protect the interests of future generations by addressing long-term global challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss.
Modi’s participation at the Summit underscored India’s growing influence on the global stage, particularly in shaping conversations around sustainable development and global governance reform. By advocating for a human-centric approach and calling for collective action, Modi positioned India as a leader in promoting global peace and prosperity.
As the world continues to face increasingly complex and interconnected challenges, Modi’s message of unity and collaboration resonates as a call to action for all nations. His emphasis on the need for reforms in global institutions, particularly the United Nations, reflects a broader recognition that the current global governance structures are ill-equipped to address today’s challenges. Modi’s speech served as a reminder that, in an era of rapid technological change and geopolitical uncertainty, the path to a better tomorrow lies in multilateral solutions and a commitment to shared progress.
The Summit of the Future provided a platform for world leaders to chart a course toward a more sustainable and equitable world. Modi’s speech, with its focus on human-centric governance, digital inclusion, and global solidarity, offered a vision of a future where humanity’s collective strength can overcome its most pressing challenges. The adoption of the “Pact for the Future” and its accompanying annexes marks a significant step forward in this journey, as the international community seeks to build a better tomorrow for future generations.
PM Modi Unveils Vision for India’s Development to Over 13,000 in New York
Uniondale, New York: Despite the setbacks in this year’s elections, Prime Minister Narendra Modi remains steadfast in his vision for India. Addressing a large Indian community gathering, Modi emphasized that his vision and programs would remain unchanged even as he now leads a coalition government.
Speaking to a packed Nassau Coliseum, where over 13,000 people gathered for the Modi&US event on September 22, Modi declared, “In my 3rd term, I will work with three times more energy, speed, and commitment towards making India a developed nation.” His promise was met with enthusiastic applause from the audience.
Modi introduced a blueprint, referred to as ‘PUSHP,’ which he said would guide India toward the goal of becoming a “Viksit Bharat,” or developed nation. The acronym ‘PUSHP’ stands for Progressive, Unstoppable, Skilled and Spiritual, Humanity First, and Prosperous. He elaborated that the country was already on this path due to its focus on education, skill-building, research, and innovation.
During his hour-long address, the Prime Minister highlighted India’s transformation in various industries. Notably, he mentioned how the country, once a major importer of mobile phones, had now become an exporter. He went on to predict, “The day is not far when Made in India chips will be available in America,” signaling a new level of technological progress for India.
Modi also underscored India’s growing influence on the global stage. “Today, when India says something on a global platform, the world listens,” he said. He cited his statement, “This is not the era of war,” made on an international stage, noting how its importance was recognized worldwide.
In particular, he praised India’s humanitarian role, emphasizing how the country had emerged as a key player in global crises. Referring to India’s pivotal role in distributing Covid-19 vaccines during the pandemic, Modi added, “India has become a first responder in global crises and remains a strong voice for the Global South.”
Strengthening U.S.-India Ties
Modi’s speech was filled with praise for the Indian community in the United States. He described them as a bridge connecting India and America, highlighting their limitless skills and talents. “Even though you have traveled overseas, no sea is deep enough to distance you from your motherland,” he told the audience, emphasizing the deep bond the Indian diaspora continues to have with their homeland.
In a move that excited many in the crowd, Modi announced the establishment of two new Indian consulates in the United States: one in Boston and another in Los Angeles. This follows the opening of a consulate in Seattle last year, further strengthening ties between the two nations.
Modi appeared relaxed and confident throughout the event, dressed in his signature kurta-pajama and jacket. His confidence was matched by the enthusiasm of the crowd, many of whom were captivated by his promises and well-rehearsed slogans such as “Modi ki guarantee hai” (“It’s Modi’s guarantee”). This marked his fifth large-scale rally with the Indian diaspora in the U.S., following the first at Madison Square Garden in New York in 2014.
Electrifying Atmosphere
The Modi&US event once again demonstrated the Prime Minister’s popularity among the Indian diaspora. The energy in the arena was electric, with the excitement palpable both inside and outside the venue. As Modi’s arrival was eagerly anticipated, the crowd enjoyed a variety of performances that celebrated India’s diverse culture. Outside the arena, dhol drums filled the air, while inside, more than 400 artists performed traditional dances like garba and mihu, alongside Bollywood-inspired acts. The celebration of India’s rich heritage set a festive tone for the gathering, which also attracted around 500 people who were seated outside.
The musical performances were another highlight of the event, with popular singers like Aditya Gadhvi, rapper Hanumankind, and Bollywood music composer Devi Sri Prasad captivating the audience. Additional performances by Aishwariya Majumdar, Chandrika Tandon, and twin sisters Kiran and Nivi added a mix of Indian classical and Western songs to the event’s cultural flair.
Diaspora’s Enthusiasm
Leaders within the Indian community expressed their pride and excitement at hosting Prime Minister Modi. Jagdish Sewhani, a prominent community leader, commented on the significance of the visit, saying, “We in Nassau County are proud and excited that an Indian prime minister, the most popular leader in the world, visited here. This was a non-political community event. We want Modi ji to tell us in the diaspora what we can do for Bharat.” Sewhani also noted that Nassau County had earlier hosted T20 World Cup matches, further deepening the connection between India and the local community.
Attendees of the event shared similar sentiments, expressing admiration for Modi’s leadership and the progress India has made under his governance. Rashmin Master, a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) who has lived in New York for 30 years, praised Modi’s achievements, citing initiatives such as the Swachh Bharat (Clean India) campaign, infrastructure development, improved security, and enhanced foreign relations. Master’s wife, Kalpana, a pediatrician, emphasized how India’s disadvantaged communities had benefited from the country’s economic progress under Modi’s leadership.
Looking Ahead
Modi’s address left the audience inspired and hopeful about India’s future, with his vision for a developed India resonating strongly with the crowd. His mention of the PUSHP blueprint and India’s technological advances were seen as signs that the nation is on the path to achieving greater global prominence.
The Indian community in the U.S. has long played a vital role in fostering ties between the two countries, and Modi’s outreach to the diaspora further strengthened those bonds. The event was a testament to the vibrant relationship between the U.S. and India, with the Indian-American community playing a crucial role in the success of both nations.
As Modi concluded his speech, the message was clear: India’s growth, progress, and global standing will continue to rise, backed by a determined and united effort from both the country and its citizens abroad.
India to Open New Consulates in Boston and Los Angeles, Announces Modi
Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced on September 22 that India will establish two new consulates in the United States, located in Boston and Los Angeles. Addressing a large gathering of Indian Americans at the Nassau Veterans Coliseum in New York, Modi’s announcement was in response to long-standing requests from the rapidly expanding Indian American community in these regions, as reported by PTI.
Modi noted that this decision reflects the needs and aspirations of Indian Americans who have been advocating for greater consular services in these key cities. “Friends, last year, I had announced that our government had plans to open a new consulate in Seattle. It is now operational. I had asked for suggestions from you for two more consulates. I am happy to announce that after reviewing your suggestions, India has decided to open two new consulates in Boston and Los Angeles,” the Prime Minister said, referring to the cities chosen based on community input.
Why Boston and Los Angeles?
The selection of Boston and Los Angeles as consulate locations is based on their significance in the United States. Boston, known as the “education and pharma capital” of the U.S., is a hub of academic institutions and pharmaceutical industries. Los Angeles, the second-largest city in the U.S., is home to Hollywood and will host the upcoming Summer Olympics. Additionally, the city’s significance as a gateway to the Pacific Rim and its relevance in global trade make it a critical location for India’s presence. The current U.S. Ambassador to India, Eric Garcetti, also served as the mayor of Los Angeles, further underscoring the city’s importance in strengthening India-U.S. ties.
Currently, India operates six consulates in the United States, located in Atlanta, Chicago, Houston, New York, San Francisco, and Seattle. The Indian Embassy is based in Washington, D.C., while India’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations is headquartered in New York City. The addition of consulates in Boston and Los Angeles will expand India’s diplomatic reach in key regions of the country.
Indian-Americans Rejoice
The announcement of the new consulates was met with enthusiasm from Indian Americans, particularly in Los Angeles. Many expressed gratitude to Prime Minister Modi and other Indian officials for recognizing the need for consular services in the region. Gunjan Bagla, CEO of Amritt Inc., a consulting firm based in Los Angeles, played a key role in the efforts to bring a consulate to the city. Bagla shared his excitement with PTI, saying, “The Modi government listens and responds to the needs of Indian Americans and of American business and political leaders. I am grateful to Prime Minister Modi, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, and former Indian Ambassador to the United States Taranjit Sandhu for the decision to open a consulate in Los Angeles.”
Bagla led a campaign advocating for the consulate, gathering more than 3,600 signatures from Southern California residents. The campaign also involved letters from various American and Indian American organizations addressed to the Prime Minister’s Office. He emphasized the importance of having an Indian consulate in a city as globally significant as Los Angeles, which plays a crucial role in the Indo-Pacific region.
Los Angeles is not only the second-largest city in the U.S. but also a major center of global commerce, with the twin ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach handling nearly 40% of all overseas trade goods entering the country. With India’s growing involvement in Indo-Pacific affairs, the need for a diplomatic presence in Los Angeles has become more pressing.
“All but one of the G20 countries have consulates here in Los Angeles,” Bagla pointed out, highlighting the need for India’s representation in a city that is both a major economic hub and a cultural center. “American business executives with an interest in India will feel more engaged with a local consul general representing India. While we have been blessed with Consul General Dr. Srikar Reddy visiting us from San Francisco dozens of times in the last year, there are numerous local events where the absence of India is clearly felt.”
The opening of a consulate in Los Angeles is expected to benefit not only Indian Americans and Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) living in the area but also American businesses with interests in India. Many residents have faced challenges in accessing consular services, often needing to travel to San Francisco for urgent matters. The new consulate in Los Angeles will streamline processes for emergency travel and provide more direct access to consular services for the large Indian American population in Southern California.
Bagla further emphasized the potential for increased engagement between Indian Americans, NRIs, and local businesses with the presence of an Indian consul general in Los Angeles. He believes that the establishment of this consulate will not only strengthen the India-U.S. relationship but also provide essential support to Indian nationals living and working in the region.
A Milestone for Indian Diplomacy
Modi’s announcement of new consulates in Boston and Los Angeles marks a significant milestone in India’s diplomatic efforts in the United States. With both cities playing pivotal roles in their respective industries—education, pharmaceuticals, entertainment, and global trade—India’s expanded consular presence will enhance its ability to serve its citizens and foster stronger ties with key sectors in the U.S.
The decision to open consulates in these cities underscores India’s commitment to responding to the needs of its diaspora and engaging with critical American markets. It also signals India’s recognition of the strategic importance of Boston and Los Angeles in its broader global outreach, particularly in the context of the Indo-Pacific region.
For Indian Americans, the new consulates represent a vital step in improving access to consular services and enhancing their connection to their home country. As the Indian community in the United States continues to grow, the establishment of these consulates will provide much-needed support for their diplomatic, cultural, and business activities.
In the coming months, as plans for the new consulates take shape, Indian Americans in Boston and Los Angeles can look forward to more convenient access to consular services and increased engagement with India’s diplomatic network. The move is expected to further solidify the bond between India and its diaspora in the United States, while also strengthening India’s ties with key sectors of the American economy.
Modi Meets Global Tech Leaders in New York, Calls for Stronger Collaboration in Emerging Technologies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently met with global technology leaders in New York during a roundtable event hosted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) School of Engineering. The gathering provided a platform for discussions on several key emerging technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Quantum Computing, Biotechnology, Life Sciences, and Semiconductor technologies, reflecting the rapidly evolving global technological landscape.
The meeting brought together CEOs from various major tech companies to explore how advancements in these fields are shaping industries worldwide and positively influencing societies, both globally and in India. The roundtable discussions focused on how technology is revolutionizing not just the global economy but also contributing to human development. This dialogue comes at a time when these industries are expected to play a critical role in driving economic growth and societal improvements in the coming years.
Prime Minister Modi expressed his appreciation for MIT’s School of Engineering and its leadership, particularly recognizing the contributions of the dean for organizing the event. He emphasized that technological collaborations, particularly through the Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technologies (ICET), serve as the foundation for the Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership between India and the United States. “The efforts of MIT and its leaders are crucial in facilitating dialogues that are helping shape the future of technology,” Modi stated.
The Prime Minister also reiterated his vision for India’s economic growth. He expressed confidence that India will become the third-largest economy globally during his third term as Prime Minister. As part of his mission to achieve this milestone, Modi encouraged the industry leaders present to leverage India’s growth story by collaborating with Indian enterprises. He urged the CEOs to co-develop, co-design, and co-produce technologies in India, emphasizing the country’s increasing focus on innovation, intellectual property protection, and the creation of a conducive environment for technological advancement.
He further noted the role of India’s government in fostering a business-friendly environment for tech innovation. “India is committed to protecting intellectual property rights and ensuring that companies benefit from the country’s expanding technological and economic landscape,” said Modi. He underscored how India has transformed over the years, particularly in electronics and information technology manufacturing, semiconductor production, biotechnology, and green energy development.
A key focus of Modi’s discussions was India’s potential as a global leader in semiconductor manufacturing. The Indian government has set ambitious goals to position the country as a hub for this critical industry, which is essential to technological advancements across numerous sectors. “We want India to become a global hub for semiconductor manufacturing, and we are creating an ecosystem to support that vision,” Modi explained.
Additionally, Modi introduced the BIO E3 policy, a new initiative aimed at making India a biotech powerhouse. This policy is expected to foster innovation in the biotechnology sector and create opportunities for both Indian and international firms. “India is committed to becoming a leader in biotechnology, and our BIO E3 policy is a testament to that commitment,” he said.
The Prime Minister also discussed India’s approach to AI, reiterating the country’s focus on responsible and ethical use. The “AI for All” policy underscores the need to ensure that AI technologies are not only accessible but also developed with ethics in mind. He noted that India’s emphasis on the ethical use of AI positions the country as a key player in global discussions about the future of technology. “Our approach to AI is centered around responsible and ethical use, and we are committed to making AI a tool for societal good,” Modi remarked.
Throughout the discussions, the global technology leaders expressed a strong interest in deepening their investments in India. They acknowledged the country’s growing importance as a global technology hub, noting its business-friendly policies and the enormous potential in the Indian market. In particular, the tech leaders recognized India’s thriving startup ecosystem, which provides a fertile ground for the development and scaling of new technologies. “India’s innovation-friendly policies and expanding market offer immense opportunities for collaboration, particularly in the startup ecosystem,” said one CEO.
The enthusiasm of the participants underscored the potential for future collaborations between India and global technology firms. With India’s government prioritizing key sectors such as AI, biotech, and semiconductors, the country is positioning itself as an attractive destination for technological investments. “India is emerging as a critical player in the global technology landscape, and we look forward to further deepening our collaborations in the future,” one tech leader commented.
The roundtable was chaired by Professor Anantha Chandrakasan, chief innovation and strategy officer and dean of the MIT School of Engineering. He expressed gratitude to both Prime Minister Modi and the CEOs for their active participation in the event. Chandrakasan emphasized MIT’s commitment to advancing technology for the benefit of society. “MIT is dedicated to pushing the boundaries of innovation and ensuring that technology is accessible to global communities,” he said. Chandrakasan’s words highlighted the importance of collaboration between academia, industry, and governments in driving technological progress.
Among the prominent tech CEOs who attended the roundtable were leaders from major corporations, including Accenture, Adobe, AMD, Google, IBM, and NVIDIA, among others. The presence of these executives underscores the significance of the event and the importance of India’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The discussions during the roundtable are expected to pave the way for new initiatives and collaborations that will shape the future of technology and innovation.
The roundtable in New York reinforced India’s emergence as a key player in the global technological space, especially in fields such as AI, biotech, and semiconductor technologies. Prime Minister Modi’s engagement with the global tech community demonstrated India’s readiness to lead in these sectors while fostering strong international partnerships. With ambitious goals, innovative policies, and a growing market, India is well-positioned to become a global hub for technology in the years to come.
Modi and Biden Strengthen U.S.-India Partnership for a Global Future
In a pivotal bilateral meeting, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Joe Biden reaffirmed their commitment to advancing the U.S.-India Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership. Hailed as the defining partnership of the 21st century, both leaders emphasized its importance in shaping a prosperous and secure future for the global community.
The meeting addressed crucial global and regional issues, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. President Biden praised India’s leadership on the world stage, notably through its role in the G-20 and Global South initiatives. Modi’s historic visits to Poland and Ukraine were also acknowledged as a demonstration of India’s growing global influence.
Both leaders celebrated the success of the Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology (iCET), which has expanded strategic cooperation across sectors like space, semiconductors, and advanced telecommunications. They reviewed progress on the “Innovation Handshake” agenda, a collaboration between the U.S. Commerce Department and India’s Ministry of Commerce to foster innovation ecosystems in both countries.
In the defense sector, ongoing projects were recognized, particularly in co-production of jet engines, munitions, and mobility systems. They also lauded the Security of Supply Arrangement (SOSA), aimed at ensuring a steady mutual supply of defense goods and services.
To promote clean energy, the leaders launched a program under the U.S.-India Roadmap to Build Safe and Secure Global Clean Energy Supply Chains. This initiative will accelerate the production and supply of clean energy technologies in both nations, enhancing sustainability efforts.
India’s signing of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) was another highlight, marking a commitment to advancing resilience, sustainability, and economic growth across the region.
The leaders concluded by reviewing agreements in sectors like trade, business, healthcare, and agriculture, underscoring that the U.S.-India partnership is vital for a cleaner, inclusive, and secure global future. Their joint statement expressed confidence that this partnership will continue to reach new heights in the years to come.
PM Modi’s Three-Day US Visit Focuses on Quad Summit, Strengthening India-US Ties
Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in the United States for a three-day official visit aimed at deepening ties between India and the US. His visit began with a bilateral meeting with US President Joe Biden, where the two leaders are expected to discuss key areas of cooperation. Following this, PM Modi will attend the strategic Quad summit and later, the “Summit of the Future” at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
The meeting between the two leaders, held in Wilmington, Delaware, President Biden’s hometown, aims to strengthen the India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership. Modi shared his excitement about the day’s events on social media, writing, “Landed in Philadelphia… Today’s program will be focused on the Quad Summit and the bilateral meeting with Joe Biden. I am sure the discussions throughout the day will contribute to making our planet better and addressing key global challenges.”
The Indian Prime Minister was warmly greeted upon his arrival in Philadelphia by members of the Indian diaspora. He shared photographs of the warm reception on social media and expressed his gratitude, stating, “Our diaspora’s blessings are greatly cherished.” The Indian diaspora has made a significant impact in the US across various sectors, which Modi also highlighted. He is scheduled to meet the community again at the “Modi And US” program in New York on the third day of his visit.
Several important agreements are expected to be finalized during the bilateral talks, including a multi-billion dollar deal in which India plans to acquire 31 predator drones from the US. Another major development will be an announcement about the India-US space collaboration, under which Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla will travel to the International Space Station as part of the Axiom-4 mission. These deals and collaborations are part of Modi’s broader efforts to enhance India’s defense and technological capabilities through partnerships with key global players like the United States.
Following the bilateral discussions, Modi will join the Quad summit, where he will meet with US President Biden, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida. One of the central topics on the agenda is China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region. John Kirby, White House Spokesperson, emphasized the importance of addressing these challenges, noting, “It would be irresponsible if they didn’t talk about the challenges that still exist in the region caused by aggressive People’s Republic of China military action.”
The Quad summit holds special significance as this will be the final Quad summit for both President Biden and Prime Minister Kishida, as they are not seeking another term in office. The Quad, short for the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, is a strategic partnership between India, Australia, Japan, and the United States. The group’s main objective is to maintain an open, stable, and prosperous Indo-Pacific region. Amid increasing concerns about China’s activities in the South China Sea, the Indian Ocean, and the Pacific, the Quad has emerged as a crucial platform for promoting peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the region.
Modi, before leaving for the US, had stated that the Quad is a key platform for like-minded countries to work together for peace and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific. This year’s summit will focus on several key global challenges, including health security, climate change, emerging technologies, infrastructure, connectivity, and counter-terrorism. The leaders are also expected to discuss the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, particularly the escalation between Israel and Hezbollah, as well as the Israel-Hamas and Russia-Ukraine wars.
A significant highlight of the Quad summit will be the expansion of the Indo-Pacific Partnership for Maritime Domain Awareness (IPMDA) from Southeast Asia to the Indian Ocean region. The White House announced that this expansion will include new, sophisticated technologies to enhance maritime security. A formal announcement is expected in Wilmington on Saturday. According to senior administration officials, this expanded partnership will provide new opportunities for India to work with regional partners in the Indian Ocean. “The Quad is more strategically aligned and more relevant than ever before,” said John Kirby, Strategic Communications Director at the White House National Security Council.
Originally, India was set to host this year’s Quad summit. However, following a request from Washington, India agreed to host the summit next year, allowing the United States to take the lead this year.
Apart from the Quad discussions, Modi will also participate in other significant engagements, including the “Summit of the Future” at the United Nations General Assembly in New York. His visit is part of India’s broader diplomatic efforts to assert its role as a global leader. The “Summit of the Future” is seen as an opportunity for world leaders to address pressing global challenges and forge a new international consensus on how to ensure a better and more secure future.
In a statement ahead of his departure, Modi expressed his eagerness to engage with world leaders and address global issues. “The forum has emerged as a key group of like-minded countries to work for peace, progress, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region,” he said. Modi also highlighted India’s desire to play a significant role in shaping global affairs, stating that the “Summit of the Future” would allow him to present India’s perspective on global challenges, representing one-sixth of humanity.
As part of his itinerary, Modi will also meet with top American CEOs working in cutting-edge fields such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and semiconductors. These meetings aim to foster collaboration and investment in India’s growing tech industry. Additionally, Modi will participate in a roundtable with American business leaders, a sign of India’s focus on boosting economic ties with the United States.
Modi’s address at the “Modi And US” event in New York on Sunday will offer him the chance to connect with the vibrant Indian-American community, whose contributions to the US have helped strengthen the bonds between the two countries. He is expected to speak on the importance of the India-US partnership and the role of the diaspora in fostering deeper ties.
With a packed schedule of high-level engagements, Modi’s visit to the US is set to further cement India’s position as a key player in global diplomacy and solidify its strategic partnership with the United States. His focus on defense cooperation, technological collaboration, and promoting peace in the Indo-Pacific reflects India’s ambitions on the world stage. As he attends the Quad summit and the UN General Assembly, Modi will not only represent India’s interests but also share his vision for a peaceful and prosperous future for the global community.
PM Modi’s Three-Day US Visit Focuses on Quad Summit, Strengthening India-US Ties
Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in the United States for a three-day official visit aimed at deepening ties between India and the US. His visit began with a bilateral meeting with US President Joe Biden, where the two leaders are expected to discuss key areas of cooperation. Following this, PM Modi will attend the strategic Quad summit and later, the “Summit of the Future” at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
The meeting between the two leaders, held in Wilmington, Delaware, President Biden’s hometown, aims to strengthen the India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership. Modi shared his excitement about the day’s events on social media, writing, “Landed in Philadelphia… Today’s program will be focused on the Quad Summit and the bilateral meeting with Joe Biden. I am sure the discussions throughout the day will contribute to making our planet better and addressing key global challenges.”
The Indian Prime Minister was warmly greeted upon his arrival in Philadelphia by members of the Indian diaspora. He shared photographs of the warm reception on social media and expressed his gratitude, stating, “Our diaspora’s blessings are greatly cherished.” The Indian diaspora has made a significant impact in the US across various sectors, which Modi also highlighted. He is scheduled to meet the community again at the “Modi And US” program in New York on the third day of his visit.
Several important agreements are expected to be finalized during the bilateral talks, including a multi-billion dollar deal in which India plans to acquire 31 predator drones from the US. Another major development will be an announcement about the India-US space collaboration, under which Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla will travel to the International Space Station as part of the Axiom-4 mission. These deals and collaborations are part of Modi’s broader efforts to enhance India’s defense and technological capabilities through partnerships with key global players like the United States.
Following the bilateral discussions, Modi will join the Quad summit, where he will meet with US President Biden, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida. One of the central topics on the agenda is China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region. John Kirby, White House Spokesperson, emphasized the importance of addressing these challenges, noting, “It would be irresponsible if they didn’t talk about the challenges that still exist in the region caused by aggressive People’s Republic of China military action.”
The Quad summit holds special significance as this will be the final Quad summit for both President Biden and Prime Minister Kishida, as they are not seeking another term in office. The Quad, short for the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, is a strategic partnership between India, Australia, Japan, and the United States. The group’s main objective is to maintain an open, stable, and prosperous Indo-Pacific region. Amid increasing concerns about China’s activities in the South China Sea, the Indian Ocean, and the Pacific, the Quad has emerged as a crucial platform for promoting peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the region.
Modi, before leaving for the US, had stated that the Quad is a key platform for like-minded countries to work together for peace and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific. This year’s summit will focus on several key global challenges, including health security, climate change, emerging technologies, infrastructure, connectivity, and counter-terrorism. The leaders are also expected to discuss the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, particularly the escalation between Israel and Hezbollah, as well as the Israel-Hamas and Russia-Ukraine wars.
A significant highlight of the Quad summit will be the expansion of the Indo-Pacific Partnership for Maritime Domain Awareness (IPMDA) from Southeast Asia to the Indian Ocean region. The White House announced that this expansion will include new, sophisticated technologies to enhance maritime security. A formal announcement is expected in Wilmington on Saturday. According to senior administration officials, this expanded partnership will provide new opportunities for India to work with regional partners in the Indian Ocean. “The Quad is more strategically aligned and more relevant than ever before,” said John Kirby, Strategic Communications Director at the White House National Security Council.
Originally, India was set to host this year’s Quad summit. However, following a request from Washington, India agreed to host the summit next year, allowing the United States to take the lead this year.
Apart from the Quad discussions, Modi will also participate in other significant engagements, including the “Summit of the Future” at the United Nations General Assembly in New York. His visit is part of India’s broader diplomatic efforts to assert its role as a global leader. The “Summit of the Future” is seen as an opportunity for world leaders to address pressing global challenges and forge a new international consensus on how to ensure a better and more secure future.
In a statement ahead of his departure, Modi expressed his eagerness to engage with world leaders and address global issues. “The forum has emerged as a key group of like-minded countries to work for peace, progress, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region,” he said. Modi also highlighted India’s desire to play a significant role in shaping global affairs, stating that the “Summit of the Future” would allow him to present India’s perspective on global challenges, representing one-sixth of humanity.
As part of his itinerary, Modi will also meet with top American CEOs working in cutting-edge fields such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and semiconductors. These meetings aim to foster collaboration and investment in India’s growing tech industry. Additionally, Modi will participate in a roundtable with American business leaders, a sign of India’s focus on boosting economic ties with the United States.
Modi’s address at the “Modi And US” event in New York on Sunday will offer him the chance to connect with the vibrant Indian-American community, whose contributions to the US have helped strengthen the bonds between the two countries. He is expected to speak on the importance of the India-US partnership and the role of the diaspora in fostering deeper ties.
With a packed schedule of high-level engagements, Modi’s visit to the US is set to further cement India’s position as a key player in global diplomacy and solidify its strategic partnership with the United States. His focus on defense cooperation, technological collaboration, and promoting peace in the Indo-Pacific reflects India’s ambitions on the world stage. As he attends the Quad summit and the UN General Assembly, Modi will not only represent India’s interests but also share his vision for a peaceful and prosperous future for the global community.
Biden Hosts Quad Leaders in Hometown, Showcasing Legacy in Indo-Pacific Partnership
President Joe Biden is emphasizing his Indo-Pacific legacy as he hosts the leaders of Australia, Japan, and India in his hometown of Wilmington, Delaware. This gathering, held on Saturday, marks the culmination of his efforts to nurture and elevate the so-called Quad partnership during his presidency. With this summit potentially being the final Quad meeting under his leadership, Biden is looking to cement his influence on U.S. foreign policy and his focus on the Indo-Pacific.
When Biden took office, he aimed to revitalize the Quad, a coalition of the United States, Australia, Japan, and India. The group previously held meetings only at the foreign minister level. Biden sought to elevate this to leader-level meetings, aligning with his vision to pivot U.S. foreign policy away from the Middle East and toward addressing both the challenges and opportunities in the Indo-Pacific region. Since 2021, the Quad leaders have met in person four times, with Saturday’s summit being the sixth overall gathering of the group.
Biden added a personal touch to this event, hosting the leaders in his hometown and organizing a joint meeting and formal dinner at Archmere Academy, the high school he attended. The gathering comes ahead of the leaders’ appearances at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
“You’ve heard the president say many times that all politics is personal, all diplomacy is personal,” stated Jake Sullivan, Biden’s national security adviser. He noted that Biden’s personal engagement with foreign leaders has been central to his approach to foreign policy. “Developing personal relationships has been core to his approach as president,” Sullivan continued, emphasizing that hosting the leaders of India, Japan, and Australia at his home demonstrates the value Biden places on these relationships.
Biden started the weekend by welcoming Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to his home, situated on a pond in a wooded area near downtown Wilmington. On Saturday, Biden hosted the Prime Ministers of Japan and India, Fumio Kishida and Narendra Modi, for talks before bringing all the leaders together at Archmere Academy.
Describing Biden’s meeting with Albanese, Sullivan said the two leaders spent time reflecting on their political careers and discussing broader global issues in an informal setting. He remarked that the meeting felt like “two guys — one at the other guy’s home — talking in broad strokes about where they see the state of the world.”
Although Biden has placed a significant emphasis on personal diplomacy, the meetings remained private. Reporters were not allowed to cover his individual conversations with the leaders, and unlike traditional international summits, Biden chose not to hold a press conference. This decision marked a departure from the usual practice of question-and-answer sessions at such events.
The summit was not just a symbolic gesture but also resulted in tangible outcomes. The leaders announced initiatives aimed at improving maritime security, focusing on increased coast guard cooperation across the Pacific and Indian oceans. These initiatives are intended to counterbalance China’s growing assertiveness in the region. Additionally, plans to improve cooperation on humanitarian response missions were outlined.
Discussions between Biden and Modi were expected to touch upon a range of topics, including Modi’s recent visits to Russia and Ukraine, as well as shared concerns regarding China. Modi stands out as a prominent leader of a nation that has maintained a neutral stance on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Sullivan noted that Biden planned to emphasize the importance of upholding “sovereignty and territorial integrity” and to encourage countries like India to take a stronger stance against supporting Russia’s war efforts. “Every country, everywhere, should refrain from supplying inputs to Russia’s war machine,” Sullivan asserted.
The meeting also presented an opportunity for Biden and Japan’s Prime Minister Kishida to reflect on their shared accomplishments before stepping away from office. Both leaders are nearing the end of their terms, with Biden’s tenure concluding in January 2025, and Kishida facing dwindling public support at home. One of the key achievements for both leaders has been the strengthening of security and economic ties between the U.S., Japan, and South Korea, especially as North Korea continues to advance its nuclear program, and China becomes more assertive in the Pacific.
Biden praised Kishida for his efforts in improving relations with South Korea, a country with a long and complicated history with Japan. The improved cooperation between the two nations has been particularly significant given the escalating tensions in the Pacific. Biden commended Kishida’s “courage and conviction in strengthening ties” with South Korea, a key move in the current geopolitical landscape. During their conversation, they also addressed China’s “coercive and destabilizing activities” and discussed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and technological advancements.
Despite the strong relationship between the U.S. and Japan, the two countries are navigating a rare moment of tension. A proposed $15 billion bid by Japan’s Nippon Steel to acquire U.S. Steel, an American company, has faced opposition from Biden, as well as from U.S. political figures like Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. The deal has not yet received a formal assessment from the U.S. government, and the review may be delayed until after the upcoming November election.
Sullivan refuted speculation that the timing of the report could signal Biden’s wavering opposition to the deal. “There’s no change in the president’s position,” he said, stressing that the review process would move forward without political interference.
The summit leaders agreed to issue a joint statement that would contain the strongest language to date on China and North Korea, reaffirming their commitment to regional stability and security. This statement was anticipated to send a clear signal of unity among the Quad nations in response to the growing challenges posed by these two countries.
As the leaders gathered to discuss geopolitical issues, they also turned their attention to a cause close to Biden’s heart: cancer prevention. The summit featured a significant announcement related to Biden’s Cancer Moonshot Initiative, a long-standing project aimed at reducing cancer mortality rates. Biden’s personal connection to this cause stems from the death of his son, Beau, who passed away from brain cancer in 2015 at the age of 46.
In a related announcement, the leaders unveiled a new collaboration focused on reducing cervical cancer in the Indo-Pacific region. This initiative is part of Biden’s broader efforts to promote health and well-being across the globe.
As Biden’s presidency nears its end, the White House is also celebrating the creation of a bipartisan “Quad Caucus” in Congress. This group is designed to ensure that the Quad partnership remains strong, regardless of the outcome of the November election.
Biden’s efforts to solidify ties among the Quad nations have been central to his foreign policy vision, and the Wilmington summit underscores the importance of these relationships as the Indo-Pacific region continues to play a critical role in global security and economic stability.
BAPS Melville Mandir Vandalized with Anti-India Graffiti, Community Rallies for Peace
Since 2016, the BAPS Melville Mandir has served as a peaceful gathering place for Long Island’s growing Hindu community. This peace was disrupted early on Monday, September 16, when vandals defaced the temple with graffiti. The hateful messages included “Hindustan Murdabad,” meaning “Death to India,” along with vulgar remarks about Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, such as “F*ck Modi” and “Modi is a terrorist.” Modi is scheduled to visit the area this Sunday.
The Suffolk County Police’s hate crimes unit reported that the messages were spray-painted between 7 p.m. on Sunday and 6:30 a.m. Monday. Girish Patel, national coordinator for BAPS Public Affairs, expressed shock at the attack, saying, “We strongly promote peace, harmony, equality, selfless service, and promote universal values of Hindus… That something like this would happen is a direct way of saying, ‘I hate Hindus.’”
The Indian Consulate General has contacted BAPS leadership, which represents the largest Hindu sect in the United States, and has urged U.S. authorities to act swiftly. In a statement, the Consulate stressed the need for “prompt action against the perpetrators of this heinous act.”
On Monday, local lawmakers, clergy from surrounding synagogues, churches, and mosques, and community members gathered outside the temple to offer prayers and support. The BAPS Public Affairs team released a statement appealing for peace, saying, “We strongly condemn these acts and pray for peace amongst all communities. We also offer our deepest prayers for those who perpetrated this crime to be released of their hatred and to see our common humanity.”
This vandalism incident adds to a disturbing pattern of similar attacks on Hindu temples across North America in recent years. From California to New York, mandirs have been targeted, with some incidents involving damage to statues of prominent Hindu figures, such as Mahatma Gandhi. In July, a BAPS mandir in Edmonton, Canada, was also defaced.
Suhag Shukla, executive director of the Hindu American Foundation, is working to help law enforcement recognize and address hate crimes against Hindus. Shukla noted that these attacks often share a common rhetoric in their graffiti—anti-Indian government and anti-Modi sentiments. She explained that this rhetoric sometimes aligns with the Khalistan movement, an extremist group advocating for a separate Sikh state in Punjab, India.
“At a very superficial level, [law enforcement is] just seeing, you know, one set of Indians attacking another,” Shukla explained. “But let’s look at the target. If there is a group that is advocating for a separate state in the Indian subcontinent, why are they attacking Hindu temples? What does BAPS have to do with a separate theocratic state?”
Shukla’s organization is in constant communication with Hindu community members to document incidents of vandalism, at least five of which have occurred in the past year. She finds this trend alarming and is working to build stronger relationships between temples and law enforcement. Her hope is that these relationships can be strengthened before a crisis rather than after.
“BAPS being one of the largest and most visible Hindu institutions has become essentially the front line, because they’re so well known,” Shukla added. Her organization provides mandirs with safety and security information, helping ensure that temples can protect their communities. “Now, there’s far greater awareness about the responsibilities that these mandirs have to their members.”
Girish Patel, who has lived in Nassau County for years, has been involved with the Melville mandir since its planning stages more than 20 years ago. He has attended the temple regularly for almost a decade. Patel admitted that, although he had heard about other temples being vandalized, he “never expected anything like this to happen” in his quiet town.
“I was just thinking, ‘Did we say something or do something wrong that would have triggered this?’” Patel reflected. “But nothing had happened, so we were completely clueless. But the point is, that it was an attack on Hindus.”
Patel agrees with Shukla that the attack on the BAPS mandir is significant, especially since there are several Hindu temples on Long Island that are geographically closer to the venue where Prime Minister Modi will be appearing on Sunday.
Patel believes that BAPS’ strong international presence and its commitment to community service make it a target, but it also fosters solidarity with people from various faiths and backgrounds. The temple has received support from numerous individuals and groups, including local, state, and federal officials, as well as representatives from Jewish, Muslim, Christian, and Hindu congregations.
U.S. Representatives Ro Khanna and Shri Thanedar both expressed concerns about the attack on the temple on X (formerly Twitter). Congressman Nick LaLota, who represents Long Island, also extended his support to the BAPS community. LaLota had recently attended an event at New Jersey’s BAPS Robbinsville Mandir, the largest Hindu temple in the United States.
Lenin Joshi, a volunteer at the Robbinsville mandir, emphasized the sense of anxiety and fear that incidents like this can create for worshippers. “While we continuously take measures to safeguard our places of worship and ensure a secure environment, incidents like this are deeply concerning,” Joshi said. “It creates anxiety and fear among devotees. No one should be afraid to visit a place of worship in the United States.”
The Long Island temple is now working closely with Suffolk County police, who have promised to increase patrols and surveillance in the area. They will be particularly vigilant during services this upcoming weekend, which typically attract a large number of worshippers.
As the community braces itself for Prime Minister Modi’s visit, the BAPS Melville Mandir is focusing on healing and safety. The messages of hate may have momentarily shaken this place of peace, but the overwhelming support from the community and local leaders stands as a powerful reminder of unity and resilience.
Trump to Meet Modi During Upcoming US Visit Amid Trade Criticisms
Former US President Donald Trump has announced that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will meet with him next week during Modi’s scheduled three-day visit to the United States. Despite his past criticisms of India as an “abuser” in terms of import tariffs, Trump praised Modi as a “fantastic man.”
Prime Minister Modi’s visit to the US is planned from September 21 to 23. Trump made this announcement during his first public appearance since an apparent assassination attempt. On Tuesday, Trump said, “He (Modi) happens to be coming to meet me next week, and Modi, he’s fantastic. I mean, fantastic man. A lot of these leaders are fantastic.” He reiterated his criticism of India’s high tariffs on imports, which has been a point of contention in the past.
Trump revealed this information during a town hall in Flint, Michigan, while addressing issues related to trade and tariffs. He highlighted, “So when India, which is a very big abuser… These people are the sharpest people. They’re not a little bit backwards… You know the expression, they’re at the top of their game, and they use it against us.” Trump added, “But India is very tough. Brazil is very tough…. China is the toughest of all, but we were taking care of China with the tariffs.” This reflects Trump’s broader critique of international trade practices and his stance on tariffs.
In his remarks, Trump outlined his approach to reciprocal trade policies. He stated, “If anybody charges us 10 cents, if they charge us USD 2, if they charge us a hundred per cent, 250, we charge them the same thing. And what’s going to happen? Everything’s going to disappear, and we’re going to end up having free trade again. And if it doesn’t disappear, we’re going to take in a lot of money.” This approach underscores his belief in a tough stance on trade imbalances to foster fairer global trading practices.
Trump is currently engaged in a competitive race for the White House against Vice President and Democratic nominee Kamala Harris. However, he did not provide additional details regarding the specifics of his upcoming meeting with Modi.
The Ministry of External Affairs in New Delhi has yet to respond to Trump’s comments or provide any additional insights regarding the visit.
Prime Minister Modi’s visit to the US will commence with the Quad Leaders’ Summit, hosted by President Joe Biden in Wilmington, Delaware. The summit will also include Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida. Additionally, Modi is scheduled to address a community event in Long Island on September 22, followed by a speech at the Summit of the Fu.
Modi’s trip is timed just under two months before the US presidential election, with Trump and Kamala Harris as the leading candidates. The general election is set to take place on November 5.
Indian Nationals Caught in Russia-Ukraine Conflict Return Home as Rescue Efforts Continue
Last week, the Indian government announced that several Indian nationals, who had been misled into fighting for Russian forces in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine, were released. Of the 91 Indians caught in this situation, many have already returned home, while efforts to bring the remaining individuals back are ongoing. Some of the men involved shared their experiences with the BBC’s Neyaz Farooquee, detailing their ordeals in a conflict they never anticipated being part of.
“I am in panic. I am not sure if I will return safely or in a box. Please save me,” wrote Urgen Tamang, a former Indian soldier, in a message to the BBC. He sent this plea from outside a southern Ukrainian city, just days before his eventual discharge from the frontlines of Russia’s war against Ukraine. This war, which has now entered its third year, forced Tamang, along with 90 other Indians, into dangerous combat zones. These men were mostly lured by promises of employment and financial security, but instead found themselves conscripted into a foreign conflict.
Most of the individuals caught in this situation were from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, duped by recruiters with offers of lucrative jobs, often under the pretense of roles as “helpers” within the Russian military. However, upon arrival, they were thrust into the war zone. Lacking military training, they were forced to navigate extremely dangerous conditions in Russian-occupied Ukrainian territories. The recruits had to survive through landmines, sniper attacks, missiles, and drones, with many unaware of the full scope of the danger they had been sent into.
The tragedy of this situation is underscored by the loss of life; so far, nine Indian nationals have died in the conflict. Indian authorities have responded by arresting 19 individuals linked to the human trafficking operations responsible for recruiting these men. In July, following a meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin, Russia pledged to release all Indians involved in the war. This promise marked a crucial step in addressing the plight of these men. The two nations have historically maintained a strong bilateral relationship, and this issue became a priority for India during the diplomatic discussions.
Forty-five of the trapped individuals have since been discharged, with some already back home and others, like Tamang, en route. “I can’t believe I am out of there,” said Sunil Karwa, an electrician from Rajasthan. Karwa had joined the Russian army in February and was deployed near Bakhmut, a city in eastern Ukraine that has been a focal point of intense fighting. Speaking from the Moscow airport while waiting to board his flight home, Karwa reflected on the harrowing experiences he endured. One of the most difficult moments was witnessing a fellow recruit from his home village being injured on the battlefield. “They sent him back to the frontline just 15 days after he was injured, and he collapsed there. He is paralyzed now,” Karwa recalled.
The recruits were primarily blue-collar workers, most between the ages of 19 and 35. They were recruited by agents operating out of India, Dubai, and Russia, and were pressured into signing contracts written in Russian, a language they could not read. They signed in the hope of better opportunities, but found themselves trapped. “The process was so quick—just a few signatures and photos and we were in [the army],” Karwa added.
Another individual, Raja Pathan, was deceived by an education consultant who tricked him into enrolling in a non-existent college. When he arrived in Russia and saw recruitment banners for the army, he decided to join, seeing no other way out after spending considerable time and money. However, the death of two friends on the battlefield became the turning point that led Pathan to leave. He was able to secure his release in August with the help of a sympathetic Russian commander and now lives in Moscow, where he assists other Indians seeking to escape.
For others, the trauma of their experience still lingers. Mohammad Sufyan, who hails from Telangana, returned to India on 12 September along with five other men. Though safe at home, Sufyan is haunted by what he witnessed on the frontlines. “In the beginning, I couldn’t speak to my family for 25 days,” he recalled. His most distressing memory occurred in February when his friend, Hemil Mangukiya from Gujarat, was killed before his eyes. “He was just 15 metres away from me, digging a trench near Krynky [in Kherson], when a missile struck,” Sufyan said. “I carried his body to the truck with my own hands.”
After witnessing his friend’s death, Sufyan and other stranded Indians recorded a video pleading for help. The video reached Indian MP Asaduddin Owaisi, who raised the issue with India’s foreign ministry. Families of the trapped men also reached out to the Indian government for assistance, leading to their eventual return.
Azad Yusuf Kumar, from Indian-administered Kashmir, was part of Sufyan’s group in the army. “It is a miracle I got back home,” he said, describing the chaos of the battlefield. “One minute you are digging a trench, and the next, artillery shells fall and destroy everything. It was pure luck whether the shell landed on you or someone else.” Kumar himself narrowly avoided death after accidentally shooting his own foot during training. “I had never touched a gun before, and with the cold and confusion, I shot my foot,” he explained. Despite the injury, his commander accused him of intentionally harming himself to avoid combat. “But I’m lucky I didn’t go to fight. Four men from my camp died in an attack, and I could’ve been one of them,” he added.
Though the release of many has brought some relief, others still trapped in Russia face uncertainty. For men like Urgen Tamang, the wait for freedom has been fraught with anxiety. Tamang, who joined the Russian army in January, revealed that 13 of the 15 non-Russian soldiers in his unit had died. Despite signing a discharge letter in August, he was sent to the frontlines twice afterward, increasing his fears and distrust in the process.
On 15 September, Tamang was finally on his way to Moscow, but remained wary of his situation. “I am out, but I will keep sending you my location,” he texted, unsure if his journey home was truly secure. His last message indicated he had left Ukraine, hopeful that he would soon make it back to India.
Prime Minister Modi’s U.S. Visit: A Crucial Opportunity to Address Discriminatory Quotas in Immigration System
As Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi prepares for his imminent visit to the United States, a pressing question emerges: Will he confront the systemic discrimination experienced by millions of Indian workers within the U.S. immigration system? Will he call on President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to enforce U.S. civil rights laws and rectify the inequitable treatment faced by Indians solely due to their country of origin?
For decades, the U.S. immigration system has systematically discriminated against millions of Indian nationals living and working legally in the country, confining them within a bureaucratic maze due to antiquated, country-of-birth quotas. This form of discrimination stands in violation of the United Nations’ International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and U.S. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Highly skilled Indian professionals, who significantly contribute to the U.S. economy, find themselves entangled in endless USCIS red tape. This has hampered their ability to advance, change jobs, or establish their own businesses, curtailing their career growth and personal freedom. Despite their legal status and years of dedicated service, their progress is hindered by the current system.
Prime Minister Modi’s visit represents a critical chance to address this issue with President Biden and Vice President Harris, advocating for immediate and impactful changes to end this discriminatory practice.
The Discrimination: Country-of-Birth Quotas
Central to this issue is the U.S. employment-based green card system, which imposes arbitrary limits on the number of green cards issued to immigrants based on their country of birth. These country-of-birth quotas disproportionately affect Indian nationals, who constitute a significant segment of the U.S. high-skilled workforce, particularly in technology, healthcare, and engineering sectors.
Indian professionals, despite their substantial contributions to the U.S. economy, are subjected to waiting periods that can extend over decades due to these quotas. Even though they fulfill all legal requirements for permanent residency, their path to a green card is obstructed merely because of their birthplace. This system not only restricts their career opportunities but also limits the freedom of their families, placing spouses in restrictive visa situations and creating legal uncertainties for children as they age out of dependent status.
The Human Toll: Living in Limbo
For countless Indian workers, this policy has transformed the American Dream into an American nightmare. Many entered the U.S. legally, often on H-1B visas, and have dedicated years to contributing to America’s growth and innovation. However, they remain trapped in legal limbo, unable to advance in their careers or pursue the freedom and opportunities they sought when they first arrived.
Indian nationals face severe consequences, including:
– Job stagnation: Their visa status prevents them from changing employers or seeking promotions without jeopardizing their path to permanent residency.
– Restricted mobility: Indian immigrants encounter travel limitations and cannot work freely in the U.S. like their counterparts from other countries.
– Family hardships: Spouses, many of whom are skilled professionals, are often barred from working, and children face the threat of deportation upon turning 21.
This country-of-birth discrimination creates a dual-tier system, treating workers from countries like India as second-class, despite their crucial contributions to the U.S. economy.
Will Prime Minister Modi Take a Stand?
Prime Minister Modi’s visit to the U.S. presents an opportunity to advocate for these millions of Indian nationals. As the leader of the world’s largest democracy, it is his responsibility to defend the rights and dignity of Indian citizens globally. By addressing this issue with President Biden and Vice President Harris, Prime Minister Modi can push for necessary reforms that have been long overdue.
Several potential solutions are available:
– Executive Action: The Biden administration could take executive action to amend or abolish the country-of-birth quotas for employment-based green cards, allowing highly skilled Indian workers to apply based on merit rather than nationality.
– Legislative Reform: Congress could enact immigration reform legislation to eliminate the discriminatory quota system, ensuring a fairer system for all workers, regardless of their country of origin.
– Temporary Relief Measures: Short-term solutions, such as expanding work permits for spouses and dependents or allowing greater job mobility for H-1B visa holders, could improve the living conditions of Indian workers in the U.S.
The Role of Vice President Kamala Harris
Vice President Kamala Harris, who has Indian heritage through her mother, could play a pivotal role in this dialogue. As someone familiar with the challenges faced by immigrants and who has publicly supported immigration reform, Vice President Harris could be a strong advocate for ending this discrimination. Her involvement, alongside Prime Minister Modi’s, could elevate this issue within U.S.-India relations and encourage the Biden administration to take concrete actions to address the injustices faced by Indian workers.
The Stakes for U.S.-India Relations
The U.S. and India enjoy a robust partnership grounded in shared interests in trade, security, and technological progress. However, for this relationship to reach its full potential, both nations must also focus on the fair treatment of their citizens. Indian immigrants have been integral to the U.S. economy, yet outdated laws continue to hinder their advancement. By championing these individuals, Prime Minister Modi can reinforce the U.S.-India bond, ensuring that both countries adhere to their shared values of equality, opportunity, and justice.
This issue transcends immigration policy; it concerns human rights, fairness, and the dignity of workers who have fulfilled their obligations and more. It is a test of both nations’ commitment to equality and non-discrimination.
A Historic Opportunity for Change
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has a historic chance to advocate for the millions of Indian nationals during his U.S. visit. By addressing the discriminatory country-of-birth quotas with President Biden and Vice President Harris, he can initiate long-awaited reforms that will provide relief to diligent Indian professionals and their families.
Will Prime Minister Modi seize this moment and push for the end of this unjust system? Millions of Indian workers in the U.S. are counting on his leadership. The world is watching, and the time for change is now.
Modi to Attend Quad Summit and Address UN ‘Summit of the Future’ During U.S. Visit
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to embark on a three-day official trip to the United States from September 21 to 24. This visit will include his participation in the annual Quad Leaders’ Summit and an address at the ‘Summit of the Future’ during the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). The trip highlights India’s growing role on the global stage, focusing on multilateral partnerships and fostering relations with major world economies.
The fourth Quad Leaders’ Summit will take place in Wilmington, Delaware, and will be hosted by U.S. President Joe Biden. This summit is especially notable as it may be the last for Biden, who has announced he will not seek a second term, and for Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, who is also expected to step down from his post. The summit will see participation from leaders of Australia, Japan, India, and the United States, continuing the momentum of the Quad partnership. According to a statement from India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), India has been chosen to host the next Quad Summit in 2025.
The Quad—an informal grouping between the United States, India, Australia, and Japan—has grown in significance in recent years, serving as a strategic platform for discussing issues relevant to the Indo-Pacific region. Quad Foreign Ministers have held eight meetings in recent years, and regular coordination at all levels among the four governments has become routine.
“The leaders will review the progress achieved by the Quad over the last one year and set the agenda for the year ahead to assist the countries of the Indo-Pacific region in meeting their development goals and aspirations,” the MEA said, adding that India’s hosting of the 2025 summit followed a request from the U.S. to host the current one. The focus of this year’s Quad discussions will be on how to address the developmental needs of the Indo-Pacific region, a strategically important area where economic, environmental, and security issues are of increasing concern.
Modi’s participation at the United Nations General Assembly will center on the ‘Summit of the Future,’ scheduled for September 23. The theme of the summit, ‘Multilateral Solutions for a Better Tomorrow,’ reflects an emphasis on global cooperation to address challenges in the 21st century. The summit is expected to bring together world leaders to discuss multilateral strategies for addressing critical issues, including climate change, economic stability, and peacekeeping.
In addition to his participation in the Quad Summit and the UNGA, Prime Minister Modi will engage in a number of key diplomatic meetings during his time in the United States. These meetings will include discussions with several world leaders on issues of mutual interest. Bilateral discussions will likely touch on topics such as trade, defense cooperation, and other areas of shared concern between India and other nations.
On September 22, Modi is scheduled to address the Indian community in New York. These gatherings of the Indian diaspora have become a regular feature of his international visits, aimed at strengthening ties between India and its overseas citizens. Indian-Americans have long played a vital role in deepening economic, cultural, and diplomatic ties between the two countries, and Modi’s address will likely focus on enhancing this relationship.
In addition to his address to the Indian community, Modi will hold meetings with top executives from leading U.S.-based companies. These meetings are seen as an opportunity to explore avenues for increased collaboration between Indian and American firms, particularly in high-tech sectors such as artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, semiconductors, and biotechnology. India’s growing tech industry, coupled with its skilled workforce, makes the country an attractive partner for U.S. tech giants, and Modi’s government has made fostering these relationships a priority.
“The Prime Minister is also expected to interact with thought leaders and other stakeholders active in the India-US bilateral landscape,” the MEA said in its statement, pointing to a broader agenda for the trip that encompasses both government-level and private sector interactions. These discussions are part of Modi’s broader diplomatic strategy of strengthening India’s global influence through economic partnerships, technology exchange, and fostering international alliances.
The visit is expected to further cement the India-U.S. relationship, which has been on an upward trajectory in recent years. As the world’s two largest democracies, India and the U.S. share numerous strategic and economic interests. This has resulted in growing cooperation in areas such as defense, trade, climate change, and technology. Modi’s interactions with American businesses and political leaders during this visit will likely focus on these key areas, with the aim of deepening the economic ties that are seen as critical for both nations’ long-term prosperity.
India’s participation in multilateral forums such as the Quad and the UN General Assembly underlines its increasing global influence. The Quad, which originally began as a loose grouping in response to regional challenges, has become a more structured partnership aimed at promoting security, stability, and development in the Indo-Pacific. The Indo-Pacific region, which includes the Indian and Pacific Oceans, is critical to global trade routes and has become a flashpoint for geopolitical competition, particularly as China seeks to assert its dominance in the area. The Quad countries, while not officially labeling the partnership as a counter to China, are widely seen as aligning in their efforts to maintain a free and open Indo-Pacific.
At the same time, Modi’s address at the United Nations will provide a platform for India to articulate its vision for a multilateral world order that responds to the challenges of the future. His speech is expected to touch on key issues like climate change, global health, economic development, and reforming international institutions to better reflect the contemporary global order.
India’s growing role in international organizations, including the G20 and BRICS, combined with its leadership in the Quad, demonstrates the country’s rising global stature. As the world grapples with numerous challenges, from climate change to global inequality, India has positioned itself as a voice for developing countries and a key player in shaping the international agenda.
This visit, while focused on the Quad and UN events, is part of Modi’s broader efforts to project India as a rising power on the world stage. It underscores India’s commitment to working with global partners to address regional and global issues. As the Indo-Pacific continues to be a region of strategic importance, India’s participation in the Quad and its leadership in multilateral forums will remain pivotal in shaping the future of the region.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s upcoming visit to the United States will be significant, not only for its role in strengthening India-U.S. relations but also for advancing India’s broader global agenda. Whether through the Quad, the UN, or bilateral meetings, the visit will underscore India’s increasing influence in global affairs and its commitment to fostering partnerships that promote peace, stability, and development.
Antarctica: The Challenge of Flying with Twin Otters
Flying into Antarctica presents a daunting challenge for both pilots and aircraft, requiring precision, resilience, and a unique set of tools. Among these tools is a 60-year-old Canadian plane, the de Havilland Twin Otter, which has proved to be ideal for this difficult mission.
“It’s a massive adventure,” says Vicky Auld, deputy chief pilot for the British Antarctic Survey (BAS). She is gearing up for the annual autumn ferry flight from Canada to Antarctica, an undertaking that takes months of planning. This year’s journey spans 12 days, covering 13,700 kilometers (8,500 miles) in 55 hours. While Auld will pilot BAS’s more luxurious de Havilland Dash-7, her colleagues will fly 40-year-old twin-engine planes with unpressurized cabins, adding to the difficulty of the expedition.
The de Havilland Twin Otters, designed in the 1960s, have earned a reputation as the “Land Rover of the skies” for their overengineered, adaptable, and rugged design. “They’re designed for bush flying,” Auld explains. “Whether on skis, floats, or big tundra tires, their short take-off and landing capabilities allow you to reach places impossible for other aircraft.” In Antarctica, the Twin Otters are indispensable, used for airborne scientific research, transporting supplies, and delivering field parties to remote and otherwise inaccessible locations. “It’s unique,” Auld adds. “I can land in places where no one has ever landed before.”
Despite modern turboprop engines, the Twin Otters have a vintage appearance, with visible struts, wires, and rivets. “You could say it’s fly-by-wire, but the wires are directly connected from the control column to the control surfaces on the wings and tail,” explains Dan Beeden, BAS’s aircraft operations manager, who oversees ferry flight logistics. Sitting inside the cockpit of “Ice Cold Katy,” one of BAS’s aircraft, Beeden reflects on its age and functionality. “Although Antarctica is our main focus, we do a lot of work in other parts of the world as well,” he says. The gleaming red Twin Otter is parked next to a World War Two-era B-17 Flying Fortress at the Imperial War Museum Duxford, where BAS conducts summer operations.
The cockpit of Ice Cold Katy is a mixture of old and new. The control column resembles those found in older aircraft, while the engine controls are hefty levers hanging from the ceiling. However, modern “glass cockpit” electronic screens have replaced many dials, and upgrades like weather radar and an autopilot have been added. While these modernizations make flying somewhat easier, comfort remains an issue. “In terms of toilet facilities, we don’t really have any,” Beeden says. “There’s just a tube at the back of the aircraft.” Other amenities, like air conditioning or a galley, are absent. “The cabin heaters keep the cockpit warm, but the top of the plane is painted black, so it gets hot in the summer,” Beeden adds.
While Twin Otters are used commercially in remote regions, such as Scotland, where Loganair connects the Scottish islands, BAS’s Ice Cold Katy has been modified with a large fuel tank that takes up much of the passenger space. For the Antarctic journey, an additional tank will be installed, ensuring the plane has enough fuel to make the trip. The ferry flight itself is not straightforward. While a commercial flight from North to South America is simple, the Twin Otter’s journey requires landing in 12 different airports from Canada to Chile. This complexity is compounded by the aircraft’s speed of only 150 knots (around 170 mph) and an operating ceiling of 10,000 feet (3 kilometers).
“There are lots of moving parts, and you’re constantly deciding what’s the best thing to do or, in some cases, the least bad option,” says Beeden. The flights present numerous challenges, from calculating fuel range to ensuring safe contingencies in volatile regions of Central and South America. Some areas are off-limits due to political instability, adding further obstacles to the already intricate planning process.
Pilots like Auld, who have been flying ferry flights for over a decade, still find excitement in the task. “I remember feeling incredibly apprehensive my first time,” she admits. “As a new pilot, you have 12 days ahead of you, flying into a new airport every day with different approaches, departures, and taxiways.” Communication difficulties, such as fast-talking American air traffic controllers or hard-to-understand Central American ATC, compound the stress of flying unpressurized aircraft for eight hours with extra fuel tanks on board.
These flights are significantly riskier than commercial flights and require special certifications. “We’re taking off at a weight where, if we lose an engine, we’re going down,” Auld explains. BAS pilots train for such emergencies in simulators, and in a real situation, the other person onboard would be responsible for dumping the fuel if needed. Additionally, the weather poses another threat, as Twin Otters fly through storms rather than over them, given their altitude limitations.
Flying out of icy runways and snowstorms in Canada is just the beginning. As the crew reaches the Gulf of Mexico, they face hurricane season, monitoring for tropical storms and other weather phenomena. Further along, they contend with fog near the Andes and powerful headwinds as they cross the mountains. At that point, they must climb to 18,000 feet and wear oxygen masks to avoid passing out.
The final leg of the journey, a 600-mile stretch over the Southern Ocean, is the most dangerous. The waters are notoriously rough, and the pilots wear immersion suits and life jackets in case they need to ditch into the sea. “There’s a certain point of no return,” Beeden says. “Beyond that, you have no other options but to continue straight to Rothera, dealing with any emergencies as best as you can.”
After months of planning, training, and preparation, the payoff comes when the Twin Otters finally touch down in Antarctica. “It’s the best and most challenging flying you can do,” says Auld with a smile. But upon arrival in Antarctica, more challenges await as the mission continues.
Every year, this intricate operation enables scientific research and exploration in one of the world’s most remote and extreme environments. Despite the dangers, the de Havilland Twin Otters, with their rugged design and adaptability, continue to play a crucial role in Antarctic missions. For Auld, Beeden, and the rest of the BAS team, these flights represent not just a logistical challenge but a unique adventure that combines cutting-edge science with old-fashioned flying expertise.
Biden to Host Fourth Quad Leaders Summit in Wilmington on September 21
On September 12, 2024, the White House issued a statement announcing that President Joe Biden will host the fourth in-person Quad Leaders Summit on Saturday, September 21. The meeting will take place in Wilmington, Delaware, and will bring together leaders from Australia, India, and Japan.
According to the statement, President Biden is looking forward to welcoming Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio. This will mark the first time President Biden has hosted foreign leaders in Wilmington since taking office, with the White House highlighting the importance of the event by stating it reflects Biden’s “deep personal relationships with each of the Quad Leaders, and the importance of the Quad to all of our countries.”
The Quad, formally known as the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, is an informal strategic forum involving the four countries, aimed at promoting stability and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region. In recent years, it has gained significance due to shared concerns over regional security and economic issues, particularly with the rise of China as a dominant force in the Indo-Pacific.
The White House’s statement emphasized the Biden-Harris administration’s efforts to elevate and institutionalize the Quad partnership. It pointed out that this process began with the first Quad Leaders Summit in 2021 at the White House and has continued with annual meetings since then. Over time, there has been a growing alignment among the four nations, and various levels of cooperation have taken place, from meetings of Quad Foreign Ministers to broader government coordination on strategic issues. The commitment to maintaining and strengthening the Quad has been positioned as a top priority for the administration, and President Biden has been active in pursuing deeper collaboration among the Quad members.
The upcoming summit on September 21 is expected to focus on enhancing the strategic alignment among the Quad nations while advancing their “shared vision” for a free and open Indo-Pacific. This vision is rooted in ensuring stability and security in the region, with the member countries working together to address common challenges.
Key areas expected to be discussed at the summit include health security, maritime security, natural disaster response, critical infrastructure, and emerging technologies. The Quad countries have consistently emphasized the importance of high-quality infrastructure projects in the Indo-Pacific, aiming to provide alternatives to China’s Belt and Road Initiative. These efforts also extend to climate change and clean energy initiatives, with the Quad nations increasingly coordinating their policies to address global environmental challenges.
Cybersecurity will also be a major point of discussion, as the Quad members aim to strengthen their defenses against growing cyber threats. In recent years, cyberattacks and data security concerns have become pressing issues, and the Quad countries have recognized the need to enhance their cooperation in this critical area. By working together, they hope to ensure a more secure digital infrastructure for the Indo-Pacific region.
In addition to these practical concerns, the Quad summit is expected to further cement the alignment of these nations on broader geopolitical issues, including the rise of China as a major regional power. While the Quad is not explicitly defined as an anti-China alliance, the growing influence of Beijing in the Indo-Pacific has prompted Quad members to increase their focus on maintaining a free and open region, with an emphasis on sovereignty and international law.
The White House noted that this summit represents an important milestone for the Biden-Harris administration, particularly given the president’s personal commitment to advancing the Quad partnership. As the statement mentioned, the administration has placed significant emphasis on institutionalizing the Quad since the first Quad Leaders Summit in 2021, and this year’s gathering will continue to build on that progress. Regular meetings of Quad Foreign Ministers and coordination at various levels of government have further solidified the partnership, allowing the four countries to work together on key global and regional issues.
In terms of concrete outcomes, the summit is expected to deliver tangible benefits for the Indo-Pacific region in the areas of health security, disaster preparedness, and climate resilience. In particular, the Quad nations have been working to improve their joint response to natural disasters, which are becoming more frequent and severe due to climate change. Maritime security is another critical area where the Quad countries are likely to announce new initiatives, given the strategic importance of sea lanes in the Indo-Pacific for global trade and economic stability.
In recent years, the Indo-Pacific region has faced numerous security challenges, from territorial disputes in the South China Sea to increased military activity in the region. As a result, the Quad members have placed a strong emphasis on enhancing maritime security, with a focus on ensuring that international law is upheld and that regional tensions are managed in a peaceful and cooperative manner.
Looking ahead, the next Quad Summit will be hosted by India, marking another step in the continued evolution of this strategic partnership. India’s growing role in the Quad reflects its increasing influence in the region and its commitment to working with like-minded countries to promote stability and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific.
The Quad’s growing relevance in the region comes at a time when global power dynamics are shifting, and countries are seeking to navigate an increasingly complex international landscape. As the world’s largest democracies, the Quad members share common values and interests, making their collaboration essential for addressing the challenges of the 21st century.
The upcoming Quad Leaders Summit in Wilmington, Delaware, will provide an opportunity for President Biden and the other leaders to reaffirm their commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific, while also delivering concrete benefits in areas such as health security, climate change, and cybersecurity. As the Quad continues to evolve, it will play an increasingly important role in shaping the future of the Indo-Pacific region and addressing the global challenges of our time.
Rahul Gandhi Calls for India-US Collaboration to Counter China’s Non-Democratic Production Model
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi emphasized the growing need for India and the United States to collaborate in offering the world an alternative to China’s “non-democratic production vision.” In his speech, Gandhi stressed that the two countries have an opportunity to challenge China’s dominance in global manufacturing by proposing a democratic approach to production that could benefit other nations.
During his discussion at the National Press Club in Washington DC, Gandhi expressed confidence in the bipartisan support that India-US relations enjoy. He mentioned that the relationship has strong backing in both countries, and there is little difference between the approach taken by the Congress party and that of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration regarding these ties. “I don’t see ourselves changing direction very much from what he’s doing,” Gandhi said, adding that the same continuity applies to Vice-President Kamala Harris’ and former President Donald Trump’s positions on the bilateral relationship.
Rahul Gandhi’s trip to the United States is part of a three-day visit, beginning in Dallas, Texas. While in Washington, he held wide-ranging discussions at the National Press Club, addressing various topics, including the future of India-US cooperation, China’s rising influence, and domestic Indian politics. Earlier on Tuesday, Gandhi also met with several US lawmakers, including Indian-American representatives Ro Khanna and Shri Thanedar, progressive Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, and Congressman Brad Sherman.
Addressing the state of India-US relations, Gandhi outlined two key aspects. The first, he said, was defense cooperation, an area where he expressed satisfaction with the current status. The second issue, however, required greater attention, in Gandhi’s view. He highlighted the growing influence of China’s production model, which he described as a non-democratic system of prosperity. “China has placed in front of us a vision for production and prosperity in a non-democratic environment,” Gandhi remarked.
He questioned whether India and the US would sit idly by and let China become the world’s primary producer or whether they would respond with an alternative. “What is our response? Are we simply going to just sit there and say, okay, China can be the producer of the world and we’re not going to do anything? Or do we have a response? What is our response to the Belt and Road, right?” Gandhi inquired.
China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been a central part of its strategy to expand global influence. However, the initiative has been criticized for its “predatory funding mechanisms,” which many argue lead developing nations into debt traps, jeopardizing their independence and sovereignty. Rahul Gandhi reiterated this concern, warning about the potential pitfalls of China’s economic expansion. “China’s Belt and Road Initiative traps needy countries by funding developments through extremely predatory funding mechanisms that compromise their independence and sovereignty,” he explained.
Gandhi argued that India and the US must find a way to offer a more democratic and inclusive vision for global production and manufacturing. “I don’t see one,” he said, referring to the current lack of a comprehensive strategy to counter China’s rise. “So to me, that’s really where US and India cooperation needs to go. How can we provide a democratic vision of production, of manufacturing that actually works to the rest of the world?” he asked.
In Gandhi’s view, both India and the US bring unique strengths to the table, which could form the basis of a strong partnership aimed at reshaping global production systems. “I think both countries bring different things to the table, and I think there’s a huge opportunity there,” he stated, suggesting that this cooperation could help democratize global prosperity.
In addition to international relations, Rahul Gandhi also addressed domestic political issues during his visit. When questioned about whether he would like to see the US exert pressure on Prime Minister Narendra Modi over domestic political matters, Gandhi strongly pushed back, asserting that India’s internal political struggles are for Indians to resolve. “The fight for democracy in India is an Indian fight. With all due respect, it (has) nothing to do with anybody else. It’s our problem, and we’ll take care of it,” he said.
This statement reflects Gandhi’s stance on India’s political independence, as he reaffirmed that external powers should not interfere in the country’s domestic challenges. His comments suggest a firm commitment to addressing political issues within the democratic framework of India, rather than relying on external intervention.
Rahul Gandhi’s remarks about the need for closer India-US cooperation come at a time when the geopolitical landscape is undergoing significant shifts. As China continues to expand its influence across Asia and Africa through its Belt and Road Initiative, countries like India and the US are seeking ways to counterbalance this rise. Gandhi’s emphasis on offering a democratic alternative to China’s production model aligns with growing concerns in Washington and New Delhi about China’s increasing global economic and political clout.
By calling for a collaborative effort to present a “democratic vision of production,” Rahul Gandhi highlights the potential for India and the US to work together in shaping the future of global trade and manufacturing. His comments suggest that such a partnership could challenge the dominance of China’s state-led model, which has been characterized by its non-democratic approach to governance and economic development.
Rahul Gandhi’s visit to the US and his speech at the National Press Club underscored the need for stronger cooperation between India and the US to present an alternative to China’s non-democratic production model. With the bipartisan support that the India-US relationship enjoys, and the shared interests of both countries in promoting a more democratic approach to global production, Gandhi believes that there is a significant opportunity for the two nations to work together in shaping a better future for the world. At the same time, he remains firm in his belief that India’s political issues should be addressed internally, without external interference.
NRIs Express Concerns About Restrictions To OCI Card Holders
Non-Resident Indians from across the globe expressed concerns regarding India’s regulations for Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) cardholders with stricter controls on activities and reclassify them as foreign nationals, as outlined in a bulletin from India’s Home Ministry. These changes impact travel, business, religious activities, and more for the Indian diaspora.
OCI cardholders, who were previously afforded many privileges similar to Indian citizens, must now obtain permits for various activities and travel to certain parts of India, including restricted areas like portions of Jammu & Kashmir, Arunachal Pradesh, and parts of other northeastern states. This shift marks a significant departure from the previously relaxed regulations that allowed OCI cardholders to participate in India’s social and economic activities with relative ease.
“The OCI Cardholder (including a PIO cardholder) is a foreign national holding a passport of a foreign country and is not a citizen of India,” the Home Ministry stated. This clarification designates them as foreign nationals and redefines their legal standing in India. Previously, OCI cardholders were treated similarly to Indian citizens in many respects, but the new policies set them apart.
George Abraham, vice chair of the Indian Overseas Congress, described the situation as disappointing. “This is a setback for OCI cardholders and the Indian diaspora,” he told *India-West*. “We always felt as though we were moving towards dual citizenship, but now the government is saying it will treat us like foreigners.”
The bulletin from the Ministry stressed that OCI cardholders must receive special permission for various activities, including missionary work, journalistic endeavors, and certain religious activities, particularly those related to promoting a Muslim agenda, termed as “Tabligh.” In addition, mountaineering activities and access to restricted areas now require formal government approval.
These restricted areas include the entire state of Arunachal Pradesh, parts of Himachal Pradesh, and sections of Jammu & Kashmir, Manipur, Mizoram, Sikkim, Nagaland, as well as parts of Rajasthan and Uttarakhand. This means that regions with significant geopolitical sensitivities or those requiring special permits for foreigners will be off-limits unless explicit permission is granted.
Additionally, the rules introduced limitations on inter-country adoptions by OCI cardholders and introduce stricter criteria for obtaining higher education in India. OCI cardholders living in India must report any changes in their residential address or occupation to the Foreigners Regional Registration Officer or Foreigners Registration Officer by email.
However, the Indian government also offered some minor concessions to OCI cardholders in the bulletin. The cost of entry to national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, historical sites, museums, and national monuments, as well as domestic flight fares, will now be in line with those charged to Indian citizens. Despite this, these concessions are seen by many as superficial in light of the other significant restrictions.
Dr. Thomas Abraham, chairman of the Global Organization of People of Indian Origin, expressed concerns about the impact on the business community. “The regulations are burdensome for OCI cardholders wishing to do business in India,” he told *India-West*, noting that OCI businesspeople previously enjoyed near parity with Indian citizens when conducting business. The reclassification of OCI cardholders as foreign nationals subjects them to more bureaucratic processes, including the requirement to obtain various permits and licenses, which could impede business operations.
Furthermore, the regulations add hurdles to the real estate market, a sector that has been fueled by diaspora investment. OCI cardholders, who previously could buy and sell property with relative ease, now need special permission from the Reserve Bank of India for any property transactions. Additionally, foreign nationals, including OCI cardholders, are still prohibited from purchasing agricultural land, a restriction that remains unchanged.
“This sends a negative message. It is not a step forward in reclaiming the Indian diaspora to engage with India’s development,” said George Abraham, highlighting the continued prohibition on agricultural land purchases. He also pointed out the restrictions on religious freedom, especially for minority communities. “If you go to a church while visiting India, you could be accused of doing missionary activity. These are constraints on freedom of religion,” Abraham said, mentioning similar limitations imposed on Muslims.
The rules also affect journalists, raising concerns about press freedom. “If you write an article critical of India, you may never be allowed to return,” said George Abraham. This is particularly concerning given the global attention to India’s political landscape, including recent coverage of large-scale farmer protests. Many international journalists have criticized the Indian government’s handling of the protests, and Abraham noted that the new regulations may be aimed at shielding the government from external scrutiny. “It is a totalitarian move prohibiting the diaspora from expressing their views, This government is not upholding the values of the Indian constitution. It is not consistent with the democracy we are so proud of,” added Abraham.
Business leaders in the Indian American community are also expressed apprehension. The complex bureaucracy involved in obtaining permits for foreign nationals, especially for conducting business, is seen as a deterrent to diaspora engagement. Thomas Abraham highlighted regulations that require foreign nationals to divulge their research findings to the Indian government, which could lead to competitors gaining access to valuable information.
Moreover, the real estate market may face significant challenges due to the new rules. The Indian Supreme Court ruling has determined that anyone not a citizen of India must seek permission from the Reserve Bank of India for any property transactions. This ruling, combined with the new regulations, creates additional barriers for OCI cardholders. “This will create problems for India’s real estate industry,” said Thomas Abraham. “If there are hurdles here, we will just pack up and go elsewhere,” he added, suggesting that diaspora investment in India may decline.
As the regulations come into effect, the Indian government faces a growing backlash from the Indian diaspora, particularly those who have long-standing ties to their homeland. The restrictions imposed on OCI cardholders, reclassifying them as foreign nationals, may significantly impact their ability to engage with India economically, socially, and culturally. The long-term consequences of these regulations remain to be seen, but many in the Indian diaspora feel the government is moving in the wrong direction.
(The above story is an updated story from an earlier version published in 2021, about the restrictions on OCI Card Holders imposed by the Government of India. In addition, the clarifications provided by the Government of India on the above story are also being published by The Universal News Network)
India and UAE Strengthen Historic Ties with New Agreements and Leadership Discussions
President Droupadi Murmu welcomed Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, to Rashtrapati Bhavan on Monday, emphasizing the “historic yet forward-looking” nature of the bilateral relationship between India and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). She highlighted that the relationship has been significantly transformed under the “visionary leadership” of both nations over the past decade.
In her meeting with the Crown Prince, President Murmu underscored the long-standing tradition of high-level engagement between the two countries. She pointed out that this visit continues the spirit of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership that India and the UAE have cultivated over the years. Reflecting on the significance of the visit, she stated that both nations had successfully expanded their strategic partnership into new areas of cooperation through several key agreements signed that day.
One key factor in the enduring strength of the relationship, according to President Murmu, is the strong people-to-people ties between the two countries, with more than 3.5 million Indian citizens residing in the UAE. She commended the UAE leadership for their efforts to ensure the welfare of Indian expatriates, particularly during the challenging times of the Covid-19 pandemic. The Rashtrapati Bhavan released a statement affirming that both leaders agreed India and the UAE share “societies with a syncretic and multicultural heritage.” They noted that the legacies of Mahatma Gandhi and Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan continue to inspire both nations, rooted in the ideals of peace, tolerance, and harmony.
President Murmu also expressed satisfaction with the significant participation of women in Emirati society, adding that both countries had proven that “women-led development” can yield positive socio-economic outcomes. This reflects the shared values of both nations in promoting gender equality and empowering women in various sectors.
The day also marked the signing of five Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) between India and the UAE, following the Crown Prince’s meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. These agreements aimed to further cement bilateral ties across various sectors, including energy, nuclear cooperation, and food security.
One major MoU was between the Emirates Nuclear Energy Company (ENEC) and the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL), focusing on Barakah Nuclear Power Plant Operations and Maintenance. According to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), this agreement is expected to enhance cooperation in the areas of plant operation and maintenance, nuclear goods and services procurement, mutual investment opportunities, and capacity building.
Another significant agreement involved the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) and Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) for the long-term supply of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). This new agreement will ensure a steady supply of 1 million metric tonnes per annum (MMTPA) of LNG, further bolstering India’s energy security. It is the third such contract in a little over a year, following similar agreements with IOCL and GAIL, which have previously secured long-term contracts with ADNOC for 1.2 MMTPA and 0.5 MMTPA of LNG, respectively.
In addition to these agreements, ADNOC and India Strategic Petroleum Reserve Limited (ISPRL) signed a MoU aimed at exploring ADNOC’s participation in further crude oil storage opportunities in India. ADNOC has been involved in crude storage in India since 2018, specifically at the Mangalore Cavern of ISPRL. This MoU builds on their previous collaboration and aims to expand it further by renewing the storage and management agreement on mutually agreeable terms.
The first-ever Production Concession Agreement between an Indian company and the UAE was also signed. Urja Bharat, a joint venture of Indian Oil Corporation (IOCL) and Bharat Petro Resources Ltd, secured the rights to operate Abu Dhabi’s Onshore Block 1. This agreement is expected to boost India’s energy security by allowing Urja Bharat to bring crude oil from the UAE to India.
A significant development in food security cooperation was highlighted with the signing of an MoU between the Government of Gujarat and Abu Dhabi Developmental Holding Company PJSC (ADQ). This agreement focuses on developing food parks in India, with the Gujarat government identifying Gundanpara, Bavla in Ahmedabad as a prime location for the project. ADQ’s interest in food security aligns with India’s long-term goals of boosting food processing and agricultural development. The Food Park project is expected to begin in 2025, and both sides will work closely to obtain the necessary permissions and approvals.
During their meeting, President Murmu and the Crown Prince expressed satisfaction with the progress made in their Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in recent years. They discussed the need to further deepen cooperation in untapped sectors, particularly nuclear energy, critical minerals, green hydrogen, artificial intelligence, and advanced technologies. They acknowledged that the success of the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) and the implementation of the Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) will provide additional momentum to the growing economic and commercial ties between the two countries.
Following his meeting with Prime Minister Modi, the Crown Prince paid homage to Mahatma Gandhi by visiting Rajghat, continuing a family tradition. His visit marked the third generation of UAE leaders to pay respects at Rajghat. In 1992, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, former UAE President, planted a sapling at Rajghat, followed by Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the current UAE President, in 2016. Continuing this legacy, the Crown Prince planted a sapling during his visit, symbolizing the deep-rooted relationship between the two nations.
The Crown Prince’s itinerary also includes a visit to Mumbai, where he will participate in the India-UAE business forum on Tuesday. This forum will bring together business leaders and officials from both countries to explore future avenues for cooperation, fostering discussions on various aspects of the bilateral relationship.
A key highlight of the Mumbai leg of his visit is the soft launch of the India-UAE Virtual Trade Corridor (VTC) and the MAITRI interface, which will facilitate trade between the two countries. The VTC will be an important mechanism to streamline and enhance economic cooperation, further deepening the trade relationship between India and the UAE.
The visit of the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi marked a significant step forward in the India-UAE relationship. The signing of key agreements across sectors such as energy, nuclear cooperation, and food security, coupled with the ongoing commitment to deepening strategic ties, highlights the strength of this historic relationship. As President Murmu pointed out, the visionary leadership of both nations has been instrumental in transforming and propelling this relationship forward into new and promising areas of collaboration.
Rahul Gandhi Emphasizes the Need for Love, Respect, and Humility in Indian Politics
Congress MP and Leader of Opposition (LoP) Rahul Gandhi, currently visiting the United States, addressed a gathering of the Indian diaspora in Dallas, Texas. In his speech, Gandhi expressed that his primary role in Indian politics is to promote values such as love, respect, and humility. He noted that these qualities are essential in shaping a healthy political environment.
“I see my role as Leader of Opposition is to inject the values of love, respect, and humility in Indian politics and all political parties,” Gandhi told the crowd. His comments come at a time when he is attempting to rally support from the Indian diaspora while continuing his strong opposition to the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
While addressing the Indian community, Gandhi pointed out that many of them share the same values that he seeks to promote in Indian politics. “I am speaking to Dallas, and who are you? You are people who have come from India, and the values that I have been describing—the values of the Constitution, respect, and humility—are in your heart, in your blood. You came to this country not with arrogance but with humility and love,” he remarked.
The Congress leader highlighted the important relationship between India and the United States. He emphasized that the bond between the two nations is crucial for both sides. “The US needs India, and India needs the US. You are the bridge between your old home and your new home. You should bring the ideas of India to the US and the ideas of the US to India,” Gandhi told the audience.
Gandhi took a moment to reflect on India’s national anthem, noting that it represents all states equally, without ranking one above the other. He connected this idea to the Indian Constitution. “Our Constitution clearly states that ‘India, that is Bharat, is a Union of States’—very much like the United States. We share the fact that we are the two biggest democracies and also that we are unions of states,” he explained.
Gandhi was particularly critical of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the ideological parent of the BJP, as well as Prime Minister Modi. He accused the RSS of having a narrow view of India’s diversity. “The RSS believes that India is one idea, but we believe it is a multiplicity of ideas. Everyone should be allowed to participate and dream, regardless of their caste, language, religion, tradition, or history,” Gandhi stated, highlighting the Congress Party’s vision of an inclusive India.
“This is the fight,” he continued. “The fight was crystallised in the election when millions of people in India clearly understood that the Prime Minister of India was attacking the Constitution of India. The Union of States and respect for languages, religions, traditions, and caste are all in the Constitution. The foundation of modern India is the Constitution.”
During his speech, Gandhi argued that the BJP’s actions are undermining India’s Constitution. He warned that attacking the Constitution would also be an attack on India’s diverse religious traditions. “People understood that the BJP is attacking our tradition, language, states, histories, and most importantly, what they understood was that anybody who is attacking the Constitution of India is also attacking our religious tradition,” he said.
Rahul Gandhi referred to his first speech in Parliament, during which he mentioned “Abhayamudra,” a gesture symbolizing fearlessness that, according to him, is present in all Indian religions. “That is why, in my first speech in the Parliament, you must have noticed when I described Abhayamudra, the fact that this is a symbol of fearlessness, and it is present in every single Indian religion,” he told the audience, highlighting the deep cultural and religious significance of this symbol.
Continuing his criticism of the ruling BJP, Gandhi accused the party of failing to understand the essence of India’s religious and cultural diversity. “But the BJP doesn’t understand this, and we are going to make them understand,” he added, delivering a sharp rebuke to the current government.
Gandhi also pointed to a shift in public sentiment after recent elections. He claimed that the fear of the BJP, which had loomed large over the Indian political landscape, had dissipated following the results. “The other thing that happened was that the fear of the BJP vanished. We saw that immediately, within minutes of the election result, nobody in India was scared of the BJP or the Prime Minister of India. So these are huge achievements, not of Rahul Gandhi or the Congress party. We are peripheral,” he said, attributing this change to the people of India, rather than his own political efforts.
“These are huge achievements of the people of India who realised that we are not going to accept an attack on our Constitution. We are not going to accept an attack on our religion, on our state,” Gandhi stated. His remarks underscore his belief that the electorate in India is growing increasingly aware of the BJP’s alleged attempts to undermine the country’s democratic and constitutional principles.
Throughout his speech, Gandhi maintained a focus on the importance of constitutional values and inclusivity, positioning himself and the Congress Party as defenders of India’s democratic fabric. His visit to the United States and engagement with the Indian diaspora are part of a broader effort to consolidate support for his vision of a more inclusive and democratic India.
As Gandhi continues his three-day visit to the U.S., his message remains clear: he seeks to promote love, respect, and humility in Indian politics while standing firmly against what he views as the BJP’s assault on the Constitution and the nation’s diversity. His engagement with the diaspora not only emphasizes the importance of the India-U.S. relationship but also calls on Indians living abroad to help foster a stronger connection between their homeland and their new country.
Modern Majoritarianism and the Lingering Shadow of Fascism
The term “fascism” is often used carelessly in modern discourse, flattening the complexities it attempts to describe. Historically, fascism has specific meanings that, when applied to different contexts or eras, may seem excessive or imprecise. However, comparing contemporary South Asian politics with fascism, particularly its Nazi variant, serves two key purposes. It highlights a connection between modern Indian majoritarianism and one of its ideological ancestors and also helps identify the core of fascism that has persisted.
India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) serves as the political wing of a Hindu nationalist militia, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). Founded in 1925, the same time when Adolf Hitler was beginning to gain political traction in Germany, the RSS defines India as a Hindu nation, excluding non-Hindus from membership. The RSS shares similarities with pre-war fascist paramilitary organizations, including uniformed drills, distinctive salutes, and anxieties about masculinity. At the heart of both movements is an aggressive ethnic nationalism, aiming to mobilize a racial or religious majority against a supposedly threatening minority.
In recent years, violence and discrimination against minority religious groups in India, especially Muslims, have been widely observed under the rule of Narendra Modi’s BJP. Events such as lynchings connected to cattle trading, riots, the bulldozing of Muslim homes, and the criminalization of relationships between Hindu women and Muslim men, under the guise of “love jihad,” have characterized Modi’s tenure as prime minister. Yet, the roots of this BJP hostility towards minorities can be traced back to the 1930s.
In March 1939, MS Golwalkar, the principal ideologue of the RSS, published *We, Or Our Nationhood Defined*, a book that outlined the group’s vision for a Hindu nation. He praised Nazi Germany for its strict preservation of ethnic purity. Golwalkar wrote, “German national pride has now become the topic of the day. To keep up the purity of the nation and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the country of the Semitic races – the Jews. National pride at its highest has been manifested here.” He concluded that Germany had demonstrated how difficult it is for different races and cultures to coexist in unity, a lesson he felt India could learn from.
The BJP has internalized this ideology. The party’s leaders and members often refer to Muslims in derogatory terms, likening them to termites. Moreover, the status of medieval mosques has been questioned, and the BJP has systematically worked to marginalize Muslims, attempting to render them politically irrelevant. Among hundreds of BJP-elected representatives in state assemblies and the national parliament, there are no Muslim legislators.
This assault on Muslim communities is further reflected in various policies. Restrictions on cattle trading, stigmatizing the hijab in public institutions, and the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) represent attempts to undermine Muslim livelihoods and destabilize their status as equal citizens. The CAA has been criticized as a religious test for citizenship, further entrenching division between Hindus and Muslims in India.
One of the main lessons modern majoritarians have drawn from Nazism is the efficiency with which it demonized minorities, transforming a nominal majority into a politically aggrieved force. Hitler’s success in turning Europe’s most assimilated minority into an expendable underclass within two decades remains a potent example. In *We, Or Our Nationhood Defined*, Golwalkar echoed this sentiment, asserting that “non-Hindu” people could either completely assimilate into Hindu culture or “…stay in the country wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment – not even citizen’s rights.”
While Nazism is often considered unique due to its rapid rise from a defeated state to a genocidal regime, and the industrial methods used in the Holocaust, the essential goal of achieving majoritarian supremacy through the subordination of minorities remains a common thread. Nazism can be viewed as majoritarianism at high speed, while contemporary South Asian majoritarianism operates as fascism in slow motion.
The likelihood of a Weimar-like collapse in modern India is improbable. India’s democracy, although flawed, is deeply entrenched. Turning it into a supremacist Hindu nation would be a gradual and prolonged process, as indicated by the last general election. However, this does not mean that majoritarianism must always proceed slowly. In Myanmar, for example, Buddhist majoritarianism resulted in the ethnic cleansing of the Muslim Rohingya population in Rakhine province. Similarly, in Sri Lanka, the state brutally suppressed its Tamil minority to solidify Sinhala Buddhist supremacy.
Whether fast or slow, majoritarian parties such as the Alternative for Germany (AfD) or the BJP share a common obsession with minorities, reminiscent of Nazi ideology. Whenever mainstream politicians begin talking about “infiltrators,” “fifth columnists,” or “failed assimilation,” the echoes of fascism become unmistakable.
Ultimately, the BJP’s brand of majoritarianism reflects both local and historical influences. The party’s rise to power has resulted in a sustained focus on undermining the political and social status of Muslims, drawing on a legacy of ethnic nationalism that is deeply rooted in India’s past. Yet, as history has shown, majoritarianism, whether swift or gradual, often leads to the systematic subjugation of minorities. The parallels between modern Indian politics and Nazi ideology serve as a reminder of the enduring dangers of unchecked majoritarianism.
108 Years Apart: The Significance of September 11th (9/11)
Bellamkonda K. Kishore, M.D., Ph.D., MBA
When we hear 9/11, our mind goes through the chilling images of the twin towers on fire and collapsing in New York City on the morning of September 11, 2001, by the audacious acts of terrorists on the American soil, after hijacking commercial airliners. It was reminiscent of the unprovoked attack of Pearl Harbor on the morning on December 7, 1941, by the air force of the Imperial Japan. The motive of the Japanese behind attacking of Pearl Harbor was a gamble to weaken the US Naval fleet in Pacific region so that Japanese can get their supplies uninterrupted during the World War II. It was a shortsighted gamble with the United States for which the Imperial Japan paid heavy price.

Fast forward to September 11, 2001, by which time the economy of the USA was booming with a GDP of $10.58 trillion, which was far ahead of that of Japan ($4.375 trillion) and China ($1.339 trillion). Thus, the second and third largest economies of the world at that time were not comparable to that of the USA. That was the time when foreign terrorists targeted the financial capital of the United States with the sole intent of destroying the United States as a dominant economic power in the world. But, unlike the Imperial Japan, which gambled, the terrorists miscalculated the strength and resilience of the economic power of the United States. Bringing down a couple of towers in Manhattan did not bring the USA down on its knees. It killed 2,996 people including the hijackers and wounded a few thousands. September 11, 2001, remained as a sad day in the history of the United States.
But, was it the first time September 11 made news in America? No, exactly 108 years ago, on September 11, 1893, a Hindu monk from India made history in the Parliament of World Religions in Chicago, Illinois. On that day, Swami Vivekanand delivered his bold and eloquent speech on goodness of religions, while highlighting the problems the world was facing by misguided religious beliefs. Specifically, in his speech, he said: The present convention, which is one of the most august assemblies ever held, is in itself a vindication, a declaration to the world of the wonderful doctrine preached in the Gita: “Whosoever comes to Me, through whatsoever form, I reach him; all men are struggling through paths which in the end lead to me.” Sectarianism, bigotry, and its horrible descendant, fanaticism, have long possessed this beautiful earth. They have filled the earth with violence, drenched it often and often with human blood, destroyed civilization and sent whole nations to despair. Had it not been for these horrible demons, human society would be far more advanced than it is now. But their time is come; and I fervently hope that the bell that tolled this morning in honor of this convention may be the death-knell of all fanaticism, of all persecutions with the sword or with the pen, and of all uncharitable feelings between persons wending their way to the same goal.
It was a coincidence that the above words were uttered by Swami Vivekananda on the same calendar day of September 11, but 108 years before. While expressing his anguish about sectarianism, bigotry, and fanatism, he said “had it not been for these horrible demons, human society would be far more advanced than it is now.” Yet, Swami Vivekananda expressed optimism that the convention in which he spoke would open avenues for a change. However, it seems that did not happen. Despite wars, massacres, genocides, and every possible onslaught on humanity, the world changed little even today. Peace in many parts of the world is apparently held in place by deterrence, not by willingness. We do not know for how long the world can sustain like that. Despite globalization of economy, food, commodities, transportation, industries, communications, banking, education, employment, entertainment, broadcast, etc., still there is mistrust among nations, leave along sectarianism, bigotry, and fanaticism. Physical barriers between the nations are falling down, while mental barriers are being fortified, even among apparently friendly countries. Sometimes, we do not know where we are heading for.
While the above geopolitical issues are still plaguing the word, it is heartening to see that at least in the domains of science, technology, higher education, and medicine, there is significant cooperation and understanding even among the countries, whose leaders do not get on well each other. This gives hope to many of us. But the question is why do people seem to come together willingly when it is science, technology, higher education, and medicine? Why do people bridge mental walls when they have to deal with issues related religion or ethnicity or identity? We may not find the answers to these questions. But it tells us we should work on things that bring us together and pay less attention to things that divide us or make us enemies. One way of achieving that goal is through proper education. That was why Nelson Mandela said: Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan said: Human nature is fundamentally good, and the spread of enlightenment will abolish the wrong. He further said: The end-product of education should be a free creative man, who can battle against historical circumstances and adversaries of nature. Finally, Swami Vivekananda said: Education should be man-making. Let us all work together to promote such a man-making education.
![]() Author: Prof. Bellamkonda K. Kishore, M.D., Ph.D., MBA is an academician and innovator turned to entrepreneurship. He is an Adjunct Professor of Internal Medicine at the University of Utah Health; Co-Founder, President, CEO & CSO of ePurines, Inc., in Salt Lake City, Utah; and a Senior Member of the National Academy of Inventors. Dr. Kishore received several academic and community awards and honors for his contributions, such as induction as a Fellow of professional bodies, citations in Marquis Who’s Who in Medicine and Healthcare and European Biographical Directory, Nelson Mandela Leadership and Hind Rattan (Jewel of India) awards from the NRI Welfare Society of India, New Delhi. Currently, he is Vice President of the US Chapter of the NRI Welfare Society of India, which was started with the noble objective of strengthening the emotional bonds between India and Non-Resident Indians. Dr. Kishore was also conferred Global Unity Ambassador by the Indian.Community. Personal Website: https://www.bkkishore.online/ |
Indian American Voters: Divided Loyalties in the 2024 Presidential Election
Satish Dharni, a 57-year-old resident of Draper, Utah, is an Indian immigrant who relocated to the United States in 2005. At that time, Dharni faced the daunting task of establishing a new life for his family, including his wife and two sons, in a foreign land. Now a registered independent, Dharni has participated in three elections, supporting former President Donald Trump in the last two. For the upcoming election, he plans to vote for Trump once again, though he has a special admiration for Vice President Kamala Harris due to her Indian heritage.
Recent data from a Deseret News and HarrisX national survey reveals that most voters perceive the Democratic Party as more welcoming to Hindus, Buddhists, and Sikhs. Although a significant portion of Indian Americans are traditionally loyal to the Democratic Party—with about three-quarters planning to vote for President Joe Biden—Trump’s tax policies, focus on small businesses, and close relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi attract many within this demographic.
Despite his reservations about Trump’s “foul mouth,” Dharni appreciates the benefits of Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which he believes contributed to economic growth through deductions and reduced tax rates for both businesses and individuals. Dharni’s daughter-in-law, Shreya Chopra, who operates hotels in Utah, Idaho, and Nevada, also opposes Harris’ proposal to increase taxes for top earners and disapproves of her stance on border issues.
Dharni has criticized the current administration for not taking a firm stance against the Khalistan movement, a Sikh group advocating for an independent state separate from India. He contends that the Biden administration is quick to criticize India’s human rights record. During President Biden’s visit to Modi in New Delhi last September, Biden stated, “And, as I always do, I raised the important (subject) of respecting human rights and the vital role that civil society and a free press have in building a strong and prosperous country with Mr. Modi.”
Despite his discontent with Democratic policies, Dharni expresses a certain fondness for Harris. “I am sorry to say that I would love Kamala to be elected,” he admitted. Dharni sees Harris’s Indian heritage as a win-win situation for conservative voters like himself.
Harris’ mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was born in India and moved to the U.S. in 1958 for her college education. Harris grew up learning about Hindi culture and frequently visited her mother’s homeland. Her name, “Kamala,” meaning lotus, is associated with Goddess Lakshmi, symbolizing wealth, good fortune, happiness, youth, and beauty.
The influence of Indian American voters could be substantial in the 2024 election. Chintan Patel, executive director at the Indian American Impact Fund, highlighted the significance of South Asian American voters in key battleground states such as Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. “When you look at a state like Georgia, where in 2020 the Biden-Harris campaign won that state by 11,000 votes, there are close to 100,000 South Asian American eligible voters,” Patel noted. He emphasized that the election could hinge on just a few thousand votes, with the South Asian community potentially swaying the outcome.
Patel also pointed out the heightened sensitivity of this voter bloc due to the Republican Party’s stance on immigration. He mentioned that recent support for mass deportations among Americans has increased, with nearly 60% of voters endorsing such efforts according to a CBS News poll. Patel observed, “When members of our community take a look at those signs, what they see is a party and a candidate in Donald Trump, who is trying to tear apart hundreds of thousands of South Asian American families.”
Milan Vaishnav, director and senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s South Asian program, cited a 2020 survey indicating that 45% of Indian American respondents felt Harris’s inclusion on the Democratic ticket made them more likely to vote. “Of those reporting they were more likely to vote, nearly half (49%) said Harris’ choice as Biden’s VP candidate made them more enthusiastic about the Democratic ticket. The number one reason given? Her Indian American heritage,” Vaishnav reported.
Malavika Kirtane Deo, a Salt Lake City resident and business owner of Spice Symphony, reflected on her voting decision. “I absolutely adore Joe Biden. But then it’s the same thing for Kamala Harris, again, more because I’m a woman. I wanted to see a woman president in my lifetime for the U.S.,” she said. Deo expressed frustration with the historical pattern of female candidates being undermined and highlighted her dissatisfaction with the Republican Party’s current state. “I decided, no more Republicans until they have the courage to stand up and say, ‘This is not a candidate for our party because he’s destroying the country,’” Deo stated.
Deo, who has lived in the U.S. for 35 years, noted her appreciation for Harris’s passion for public service, regardless of her Indian heritage. She believes Harris’s message about advocating for the underdog resonates with her children, reflecting values of standing up for the marginalized.
On the Republican side, efforts to appeal to Indian American voters continue. South Asian Women for Harris raised $250,000 during a two-hour Zoom call in late July. Vaishnav observed that while Indian Americans generally align with the Democratic Party, Republicans are making significant efforts to win over this electorate. “However, Republicans have consistently tried to woo Indian and South Asian voters and, this election, both sides are making a big push to win over their votes,” Vaishnav said. He added, “My sense is that the organizational, enthusiasm, and demographic advantages are with the Democrats right now.”
Former President Trump has made several efforts to court Indian American voters, including hosting the “Howdy Modi” summit in 2019, which attracted over 50,000 attendees. Trump also expressed support for giving green cards to foreign students graduating from U.S. universities, a policy likely to resonate with South Asians.
Indian Americans are increasingly active in politics. Besides Harris, the 2024 Republican primary featured candidates of Indian heritage, such as former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley and businessman Vivek Ramaswamy. Although these candidates have withdrawn from the race, Vice Presidential nominee Sen. JD Vance’s wife, Usha Vance, also has Indian roots. Vaishnav commented that while vice presidential candidates and their spouses typically have a limited impact on electoral outcomes, the current Republican Party’s ideologies may not align well with most Indian American voters. “As time has gone on, this race has settled down and Indian American voters are strongly behind the Harris-Walz ticket. As incomes continue to rise and the diversity of the Indian diaspora grows, it is natural that more Indian Americans will support the Republican Party. But, ideologically, this version of the Republican Party is too extreme for most Indian Americans,” Vaishnav concluded.
US Urges India to Leverage Russia Ties to End Ukraine Conflict
The US State Department has called on India to use its longstanding relationship with Russia to help bring an end to the war in Ukraine. Recognizing India’s unique position, the US believes the nation could play a significant role in urging Russian President Vladimir Putin to cease hostilities and work towards a peaceful resolution.
During a briefing on Monday, US State Department Spokesperson Mathew Miller emphasized India’s influential ties with Russia, saying, “India has a longstanding relationship with Russia. I think that’s well-known. And we have encouraged India to utilize that relationship with Russia, that longstanding relationship and the unique position that they have, to urge President Putin to end his illegal war and to find a just peace, a lasting peace to this conflict; to tell Putin to respect the UN Charter, to respect Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty.”
Miller reiterated that the US will continue to encourage India to use its relationship with Russia in a way that promotes peace. He stated that India remains an important partner in discussions regarding Russia. Miller had previously made similar remarks on July 9, following Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Russia.
Prime Minister Modi, during his recent visit to Russia, expressed his belief that the solution to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine lies in diplomatic discussions rather than on the battlefield. In his talks with Putin, Modi urged for peace talks and condemned the loss of innocent lives in the war, notably expressing sorrow over the deaths of children in Kyiv after a Russian missile attack on a hospital, which resulted in 37 fatalities.
Despite this, India has not explicitly condemned Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Shortly after Modi’s visit to Moscow, India abstained from voting on a United Nations General Assembly resolution that demanded Russia immediately cease its military aggression against Ukraine. The resolution also called for the withdrawal of Russian forces and unauthorized personnel from the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. India was one of 60 countries that chose to abstain from the vote, which called for Russia to withdraw its forces from Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders.
While India has maintained a neutral stance, its actions have drawn criticism from Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed strong disapproval of Modi’s visit to Russia. In a pointed statement, Zelenskyy said, “It is a huge disappointment and a devastating blow to peace efforts to see the leader of the world’s largest democracy hug the world’s most bloody criminal in Moscow on such a day.” Zelenskyy’s comments referred to Modi’s warm interaction with Putin during a time of escalating violence in Ukraine.
India has reportedly conveyed its displeasure over Zelenskyy’s remarks through diplomatic channels. According to sources, the Indian government expressed its dissatisfaction with the Ukrainian president’s criticism to the Ukrainian mission in New Delhi.
The diplomatic balancing act that India has attempted in this conflict highlights its complex relationship with both Russia and Western nations. India and Russia have shared deep-rooted ties, especially in terms of defense and energy partnerships, which have persisted despite increasing international condemnation of Russia’s actions in Ukraine. At the same time, India’s relationship with the United States has grown stronger in recent years, particularly in areas of trade, technology, and security cooperation.
Miller underscored that despite India’s ties with Russia, the US considers India a strategic partner and remains committed to engaging in robust dialogue with New Delhi on various issues, including its relationship with Moscow. “India is a strategic partner,” he said, adding that discussions with India on Russia will continue even amid differing views on the Ukraine conflict.
This is not the first time India has faced diplomatic pressure over its stance on the Russia-Ukraine war. The US and other Western nations have frequently urged India to take a firmer position against Russia, especially in international forums. However, India has consistently maintained a neutral stance, focusing instead on advocating for peaceful negotiations and a resolution to the conflict through dialogue.
India’s abstention at the UN General Assembly on the resolution calling for an end to Russia’s military aggression came just days after Modi’s high-profile visit to Moscow, during which he discussed the ongoing conflict with Putin. India’s decision not to support the resolution has been interpreted by some as a reflection of its cautious approach, seeking to avoid alienating Russia while also maintaining its growing partnership with the US and other Western countries.
India’s strategic balancing act between these global powers highlights the challenges it faces in navigating the complex geopolitical landscape shaped by the Ukraine war. While India has historically enjoyed strong ties with Russia, particularly in areas like defense procurement, its relationship with the US and Western nations has become increasingly significant in recent years.
At the same time, the US continues to advocate for countries like India to use their influence to push for a resolution to the conflict. Washington sees India’s relationship with Moscow as a potential lever to encourage Putin to seek peace. Miller’s comments reflect this ongoing diplomatic effort to align India’s stance more closely with that of the US and its allies, even as India seeks to balance its strategic interests.
The US is encouraging India to use its relationship with Russia to promote peace in Ukraine, recognizing India’s unique position in global diplomacy. While Prime Minister Modi has advocated for peace talks, India has refrained from directly condemning Russia’s actions, leading to criticism from Ukraine. As India navigates its relationships with both Russia and the US, it faces the challenge of balancing its strategic interests amid international calls for a resolution to the conflict.
Anil Kapoor’s Victory in AI Rights Sparks Industry Change
Bollywood icon Anil Kapoor has earned a spot on TIME Magazine’s second annual TIME 100 AI list, which highlights the most influential figures shaping the future of artificial intelligence. His inclusion comes after a landmark legal victory in September 2023, where he successfully protected his persona against unauthorized use through AI. This victory has broader implications for the entertainment industry, especially as AI becomes increasingly intertwined with film and media.
Kapoor’s legal win came when the Delhi High Court issued an interim injunction, barring 16 different entities from misusing his name, voice, likeness, and other personal traits for commercial purposes. The ruling stemmed from Kapoor’s efforts to clamp down on the unauthorized circulation of edited videos and emojis featuring his image, along with his signature catchphrase “jhakaas,” which shot to fame after his 1985 film *Yudh*. Reflecting on this significant step, Kapoor told *Variety*, “Every actor has the right to protect themselves.”
The court’s decision reinforced Kapoor’s rights, legally prohibiting the defendants from using his name, image, or any part of his persona to create merchandise, ringtones, or other commercial products. This ruling sets a precedent in Bollywood, one of the world’s largest film industries, which produces over 1,500 movies annually.
This victory for Kapoor arrives at a pivotal moment, as Bollywood and the global entertainment industry are grappling with the implications of artificial intelligence and deepfake technology. AI’s potential to replicate voices, images, and even create synthetic performances poses complex challenges for actors, filmmakers, and legal systems. Kapoor’s case illustrates the fine line between creativity and exploitation that the entertainment world must now navigate.
The problem of AI misuse in Bollywood isn’t new. In 2022, deepfake videos of renowned Indian actresses Alia Bhatt and Rashmika Mandanna circulated widely, raising concerns about how AI could be used to manipulate public figures. The following year, during the Indian elections, AI-generated videos featuring Bollywood stars Aamir Khan and Ranveer Singh criticizing Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi went viral, leading to widespread public alarm. These incidents have shown how AI can be misused to spread misinformation, distort public perception, and harm the reputations of celebrities and public figures alike.
Kapoor’s successful legal battle against these AI-driven infringements has broader significance for Indian entertainment, offering a potential path for other stars who wish to safeguard their image and likeness in the age of AI. By securing this legal victory, Kapoor has paved the way for other celebrities to pursue similar protections. This trend could lead to stricter regulations on how AI is used in entertainment, especially when it comes to using the likeness of actors and public figures without their consent.
In fact, Kapoor’s case already appears to have inspired other legal actions. In July 2023, just a few months after Kapoor’s victory, the Bombay High Court granted temporary relief to famous Indian playback singer Arijit Singh, in a case that closely mirrored Kapoor’s. Singh had taken legal action against platforms that were using his voice without permission. These AI platforms had replicated Singh’s distinctive voice, even going as far as using text-to-speech software to convert written text into audio that sounded like him. This marked another significant legal development in the growing movement to safeguard the rights of artists in the face of AI-driven threats. As TIME Magazine journalist Astha Rajvanshi noted, “The case was heard after unauthorized AI platforms mimicked Singh’s name and likeness without consent, with one platform even using text-to-speech software to convert text into his voice.”
These legal victories suggest that more and more artists will seek legal remedies to protect their rights as AI technology continues to advance. The rapid development of deepfakes, voice cloning, and other AI-driven innovations has made it easier than ever for unauthorized parties to manipulate the likenesses of public figures, and this poses new challenges for the legal frameworks that govern intellectual property and personality rights. With Kapoor’s and Singh’s cases setting the stage, it seems likely that many more actors, singers, and other celebrities will turn to the courts to protect their images, voices, and other personal traits.
Kapoor’s inclusion on TIME’s 100 AI list not only highlights his legal victory but also underscores the importance of addressing the ethical and legal challenges posed by AI. The list, which celebrates the top 100 most influential individuals shaping the future of AI, recognizes those who are working to ensure that AI is developed and used responsibly. Kapoor’s fight to protect his persona in the age of AI reflects his deep understanding of the potential consequences of AI misuse, and his actions have resonated throughout the entertainment industry.
Moreover, the issue of AI exploitation is not confined to Bollywood or the entertainment world. Across industries, AI has become a powerful tool, but it has also opened the door to ethical dilemmas and legal battles. AI can generate synthetic media, clone voices, and manipulate images, but it can also distort reality and mislead audiences. Kapoor’s victory, therefore, is not just about one actor protecting his brand; it’s about drawing a line in the sand against the unchecked use of AI in a way that infringes upon the rights of individuals.
For Bollywood, the question now is how the industry will adapt to these new challenges. With over 1,500 films being produced annually, the potential for AI misuse is immense. As actors, directors, and producers navigate this new landscape, they will need to consider how best to protect their intellectual property while also leveraging the opportunities that AI offers for creative expression. Kapoor’s legal battle is just the beginning of what is likely to be a much broader conversation about AI’s role in the future of entertainment.
Ultimately, Anil Kapoor’s victory is a significant milestone in the fight for artists’ rights in the digital age. His success not only establishes a legal precedent but also encourages others in the industry to stand up for their rights in the face of emerging technologies. As AI continues to evolve, so too will the need for robust legal protections to ensure that individuals retain control over their own likenesses, voices, and identities. Kapoor’s inclusion on the TIME 100 AI list is a testament to his leadership in this crucial area and serves as a reminder that even in an age of rapidly advancing technology, the rights of individuals must be respected and upheld.
Biden Administration Investigates Airline Frequent-Flyer Programs Amid Consumer Complaints
The Biden administration is taking a closer look at the frequent-flyer programs of the four largest U.S. airlines—American Airlines, Delta Airlines, Southwest Airlines, and United Airlines—due to concerns over the devaluation of points and the constantly changing requirements for redeeming them. Many consumers have voiced frustrations about how airlines modify the number of points or miles needed to book flights, often without much notice.
On Thursday, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg sent a letter to the CEOs of these four major airlines, requesting detailed reports about their loyalty programs, including policies, fees, and any other relevant features. This inquiry follows increasing concerns from consumers about the transparency and fairness of these frequent-flyer programs.
One of the most common complaints is that airlines frequently increase the number of points required to earn a free flight, making it harder for consumers to take advantage of the points they’ve accumulated. Additionally, there are reports of airlines limiting the availability of seats that can be purchased with points, further complicating the redemption process.
Buttigieg acknowledged that frequent-flyer programs do offer value to consumers, noting that many people rely on these programs to help fund vacations or family trips. However, he also raised concerns about the power imbalance between airlines and their customers. “Unlike a traditional savings account, these rewards are controlled by a company that can unilaterally change their value,” he said in a statement from the Transportation Department. He emphasized that the department’s goal is to ensure these programs are transparent and that consumers receive the value they were promised. “Our goal is to ensure consumers are getting the value that was promised to them, which means validating that these programs are transparent and fair,” Buttigieg stated.
Airlines have responded to the inquiry, each defending the integrity of their loyalty programs. Delta Airlines, for instance, said in a statement that the loyalty of its SkyMiles members “means everything to us” and that providing a rewarding experience is their top priority. Southwest Airlines also highlighted a unique feature of its program, noting that points earned never expire, and they offer more seats for booking with points than their competitors.
Airlines for America, a trade group representing the major U.S. airlines involved in this investigation, stressed the popularity of frequent-flyer programs. A spokesperson from the group commented, “Millions of people enjoy participating in these loyalty programs. U.S. carriers are transparent about these programs, and policymakers should ensure that consumers can continue to be offered these important benefits.”
Frequent-flyer programs have evolved significantly since their inception. Initially, these programs rewarded consumers based on the number of flights taken or miles flown. Over time, they’ve shifted towards being more centered around consumer spending, particularly through airline-branded credit cards. These credit card programs have become a major revenue stream for airlines, with banks purchasing miles from airlines and offering them as rewards for customers who use the cards.
In May, the Transportation Department, alongside the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), held a hearing about frequent-flyer programs. This hearing, which covered many of the same issues addressed in Buttigieg’s letter, included testimonies from consumer advocates and representatives from three smaller airlines. However, none of the four major airlines now under investigation were represented at the hearing.
Erin Witte, a representative of the Consumer Federation of America, was one of the advocates who testified at the hearing. She expressed frustration over how the programs have changed from their original intent. “It’s ironic that many of them have morphed into programs that are anything but loyal to their customers and instead make people feel like they need an insurance policy to keep the points they have earned,” Witte remarked. She expressed satisfaction that the Transportation Department is now taking a closer look at these programs.
A report by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau presented during the May hearing revealed a significant rise in complaints about credit card rewards. The CFPB noted receiving more than 1,200 complaints in 2022 related to these rewards, a 70% increase compared to pre-pandemic levels. While frequent-flyer programs have drawn considerable attention, loyalty programs tied to hotels, retailers, and other businesses also play a significant role in this issue. Many of these businesses have credit card-linked loyalty programs as well, leading to increased consumer dissatisfaction.
Buttigieg has now given the airlines a 90-day deadline to provide reports covering a wide range of issues. These reports are expected to include details on how point values are determined, any fees consumers are required to pay to redeem points, and the specifics of partnerships between airlines and banks that purchase miles. These deals, involving airlines and banks, often encourage consumers to use branded credit cards by offering additional miles for their purchases.
Additionally, Buttigieg’s order requests that airlines outline any changes made to their frequent-flyer programs since July 31, 2018, including how those changes have affected the dollar value of reward points. This information is critical in determining whether consumers have experienced a reduction in the value of their earned miles or points and whether airlines are being transparent in communicating these changes.
The frequent-flyer program inquiry comes at a time when airline industry practices are under intense scrutiny. Beyond loyalty programs, airlines have also faced criticism for operational inefficiencies, such as frequent delays, cancellations, and issues related to refund policies during the pandemic. The Biden administration, through the Department of Transportation, has made it clear that it intends to hold airlines accountable for these practices to ensure consumers are treated fairly.
For now, consumers and industry experts alike will be awaiting the results of this latest investigation. As Buttigieg’s department continues its oversight of the airline industry, the reports from these major airlines will likely set the stage for future reforms. Whether the inquiry will lead to significant changes in how frequent-flyer programs operate remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the pressure on airlines to increase transparency and fairness is mounting.
Airlines have yet to indicate whether they plan to make changes to their programs in light of the investigation. However, given the heightened focus on consumer rights and protection, airlines may soon face more regulations that aim to protect frequent-flyer participants from sudden or unfair devaluation of their earned points.
All India Catholic Union Calls for Security of Religious Minorities In Every Country of South Asia
The All India Catholic Union, the 105-year-old Laity organization, has called upon the governments of the countries of the south Asian subcontinent to assure the safety and security of religious minorities in their countries, as threats to a minority in one nation has repercussions in other countries.
Er. Elias Vaz, the national president of the Union, popularly known as AICU, welcomed assurances of security and safety by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, the head of the new government of Bangladesh, to Hindu and Christian minorities who are apprehensive following the end of the Sheikh Hasina regime in a student-led revolt in August.
Hindu temples, homes and businesses, in some areas had faced mob violence, with at least two deaths. The tiny Christian community, which numbers less than one percent of the population was also very apprehensive.
Hindus and Buddhists are minorities in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, while Muslims are a minority in India, Sri Lanka and Nepal. Christians are a minority in all eight countries, and face various levels of persecution in all of them, including India.
Er Vaz also urged Goa Cardinal Filipe Neri Ferraro, the new president of the Federation of Asian Bishops, FABC, to use its good offices in each country to stress religious freedom not merely as a basic human right, but critical in economic and social development.
Er Vaz, a senior corporate head from Goa, was re-elected for a second two-year term as National President of the AICU, which is the largest organization of Christian laity in the country, at the two-day Annual General Meeting of the Union in Conoor in Tamil Nadu. Mr Anthony Chinnappan was re-elected National Vice President for a second term.
In his address to members after his re-election, Mr Vaz said the AICU would continue its advocacy of freedom of faith and belief (FORB), guaranteed both in the Indian constitution and in the Charter of the United Nations.
The National President also committed the AICU to work with the community in equipping its youth with the training and grooming to join national and state civil services, and in the existing and emerging sectors in industry and commerce. The AICU has its own programme of holding occasional training programmes in various fields including reconciliation.
The AICU passed several resolutions concerning issues of the Christian community in the country. The Union noted that the situation in the state of Manipur, which flared up on 3rd May 2023 with the gang rape of two Kuki women and large scale targeted violence, has continued to deteriorate. The state government and the chief minister had in fact presided over the aggravation of the situation. The Union called upon the Prime Minister, Mr Narendra Modi, to take urgent measures to end violence and bring various groups to the discussion table for a lasting peace.
AICU also called upon President Mrs Draupadi Murmu to ensure that the rights of scheduled tribes across the country were not curtailed or diluted. There have been alarming reports that some political groups have launched a hate campaign against Christian Tribals, and are inciting other tribals against them. AICU has urged the President to ensure there was no attempt on the Scheduled Tribe Rights of Christian Adivasis.
Another resolution called upon the Central government to initiate steps to restore the rights of Dalit Christians, including the protection of law and affirmative as Scheduled Tribes. The rights were taken away by the Presidential Order of 1950 which continues to be challenged in courts of law. The AICU is among Christian and Muslim groups which have moved the Supreme Court for the restoration of these rights.
AICU also called upon the Union government and state administrations to ensure that scholarships for students of minority communities were given in proportion to their populations. There should be no attempt to politicise scholarships and play one community against another.
Political Turmoil in Bangladesh: Hasina’s Fall, the Rise of an Interim Government, and Regional Dynamics
Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus was sworn in as chief adviser (Updeshta) of Bangladesh’s interim government on the evening of August 8, taking the oath of office at the presidential palace in Dhaka. Alongside Yunus, an advisory council consisting of representatives of civil society organizations, student leaders, freedom fighters, law professionals, medical and technical sector representatives, and business leaders also took their oaths. The 84-year-old Yunus, a renowned global figure and the founder of Grameen Bank – a microfinancing institution that provides loans to the poor – was unanimously approved by the army, political leaders, student representatives, civil society organizations, and advocacy groups to head the interim government.
His appointment came after weeks of student-led protests, civil unrest, attacks against Hindu minority groups, and clashes between civilians and police in which hundreds of people died. The violence ultimately led the army, headed by Chief of Army Staff General Waker-uz-Zaman, to take control of the country, forcing Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to step down on August 5. Within 72 hours, Yunus had been appointed to stabilize the nation during a period of turmoil.
Soon after Zaman’s address to the nation in the presence of opposition leaders, civil society members, and representatives of the Anti-Discrimination Students Movement (ADSM) – a united front against Prime Minister Hasina and her party, the Awami League – Hasina made a panicked call to “come for the moment to India.” For the time being, she remains in India, reportedly in a safe house, but she is expected to eventually move to a third country. According to the Bangladeshi media, Hasina has sought asylum in the United Kingdom. These developments come against the backdrop of her victory in the January 2024 parliamentary elections, when she won a fourth consecutive term.
What led to Sheikh Hasina’s downfall?
Having received a resounding electoral mandate in the 2024 parliamentary elections, what led to Hasina’s downfall?
Sheikh Hasina was sworn in as prime minister of Bangladesh for a fourth consecutive term in January 2024. Her electoral victory was marked by allegations of election-rigging, coercive use of force against the opposition, and global criticism of the degradation of democracy in Bangladesh during her three previous terms (2009–2024). Hasina and the Awami League had gradually lost their footing as a result of large-scale political malpractice. Therefore, her decline was not sudden, but rather the result of quiet opposition that had been building since 2018.
Although Hasina was able to use the state machinery to ensure her victory, the student protests that began in June marked a turn toward active resentment of the prime minister and her administration. The student protests initially focused on the country’s controversial quota system, which reserved 30% of government jobs for relatives and dependents of the freedom fighters (Mukti Joddhas) who took part in the 1971 Liberation War (Mukti Juddho). The protests eventually spread to educational institutions across Bangladesh, as students demanded the abolition of the quota system, which they viewed as discriminatory and contrary to equal opportunity rights.
The quota system, which has disproportionately benefited supporters of the ruling Awami League, was seen as a strategic tool that Hasina used to place trusted allies in key bureaucratic positions, thereby tightening her control over the country’s administration. This practice exacerbated the already-pressing issues of youth unemployment and limited career prospects in a country where civil service jobs are considered secure and stable careers. At a time when Bangladesh was striving for economic development, the quota system was perceived as limiting options for the youth population, fueling discontent and opposition.
The quota system was introduced in the aftermath of the 1971 war to reward the freedom fighters who had fought and sacrificed during the armed war against the Pakistan Army to liberate East Pakistan (present-day Bangladesh). Soon after Bangladesh achieved independence in December 1971, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman – founder of the Awami League, top leader of the freedom army (Mukti Bahini), popularly known as “Bangabandhu” (friend of Bangla), and revered as the “father of the nation” – introduced the quota system in 1972. He remained active in politics until his assassination in 1975.
Under the subsequent extremist Islamic and military regimes, the quota system was sidelined. However, Mujib’s daughter, Sheikh Hasina, actively sought to reinstate the quota system during her first term as prime minister from 1996 to 2001. The policy remained on the margins under the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) administration led by Prime Minister Begum Khaleda Zia (2001–2006) and the three interim governments that followed (2006–2008). Hasina made a comeback in 2009 and restored the 30% reservation for freedom fighters and their dependents until it was abolished in 2018 in response to student opposition. As Hasina sought a third term in December 2018, she abandoned the policy to prevent the opposition from taking advantage of the student protests and make it an election issue.
The protests over the quota system again halted the national capital of Dhaka after Hasina’s administration appealed to the Supreme Court of Bangladesh and resumed the policy in June 2024, five months after winning her fourth term. Students again took to the streets, and the situation soon turned hostile when the government proved unwilling to abandon the policy. Following violent protests that caused the deaths of more than 133 people, including students, civilians, and security officials, on July 21, the Supreme Court ruled to abolish the quota for all government sector jobs. While the court’s ruling was expected to restore peace, the situation did not abate, as many student leaders accused the administration of intimidation, police crackdowns, and attacks by groups linked to the Awami League.
The tensions were exacerbated by inflammatory remarks allegedly made by government officials, including Prime Minister Hasina, referring to the protesting students as razakars – a derogatory term for individuals who sided with the 1971 anti-liberation forces. The Awami League’s attempt to portray anti-quota forces as anti-national eventually became an anthem for the protesters.
Another reason for the ongoing protests even after the Supreme Court’s July 21 verdict was the country’s high unemployment rate, especially in the government sector. Citing an International Labour Organization (ILO) report, a preliminary United Nations analysis of labor conditions in Bangladesh reported 12.3% unemployment in the government sector in 2023 compared to 3.58% in the overall labor market. Meanwhile, the ILO acknowledged that the share of youth in the labor force had increased, making youth employment a high priority. While the quota system had little impact on youth labor outside the state sector, organized government opportunities were given primarily to Awami League supporters.
The “second coming” of the anti-Hasina protests.
August 4 marked the “second coming” of the anti-Hasina protests.
The Supreme Court verdict was seen as a political defeat for the Awami League. In the days following the July 21 decision, the Bangladesh Chhatra League, an Awami League–affiliated student wing, clashed with protesters at Dhaka University. The situation quickly turned violent, with arson and killings taking place across Bangladesh. On August 5, the ADSM, a coalition of student representatives from different groups protesting the Hasina administration, organized the “Long March to Dhaka,” whose sole agenda was the resignation of the Hasina administration. In response, the government reportedly shut down the internet, imposed a curfew, and announced a three-day holiday.
Seeing no improvement in spite of preventive measures, the army briefed the prime minister on the deteriorating law and order situation across the country. Hasina seems to have ordered even stricter measures, but the army refused. Lacking support from the military, Hasina made a quick decision to resign on August 5. Reports suggest that she had already sensed disquiet within the army a day earlier, but, thinking that the army would take strong action against the protesters, she believed her power and position were assured. Following Hasina’s resignation, Army Chief General Zaman took responsibility for the country and promised to form an interim government. Fearing for her life, Hasina sought approval to go to India, a request that was quickly approved by Delhi.
Why was the 30% quota so crucial for the Hasina government that she imposed a curfew, shut down the internet, curtailed civil liberties, and sought to take military action against the protesters?
These actions were taken primarily to assert her political authority and ensure unconditional support from the Awami League even as her standing as a democratic leader waned. This reasoning, however, would seem to contradict the outcome of Bangladesh’s January 2024 parliamentary elections, which gave Hasina a fourth term in office.
This brings us to the second reason for Hasina’s downfall: perceived authoritarian rule. Hasina’s time in power was seen as somewhat autocratic, as the politics of favoritism seemed to thrive and democratic norms appeared to be compromised. Since 2018, Hasina has been criticized for failing to abide by democratic norms and for dismantling the political opposition by imprisoning opponents on charges of corruption, anti-national activities, and so on. Leading BNP opposition leaders were barred from contesting in the 2018 elections, including former Prime Minister Zia, who was then serving a 10-year prison sentence for corruption. Even as Hasina used the state machinery to counter the opposition, she could see that anti-incumbency sentiment was growing, and suppressing the opposition was a way to ensure her victory.
The Awami League–led Grand Alliance won 96% of the vote in the 2018 elections, giving Hasina a third term (2014-2018) as the opposition boycotted the polls. Leading human rights organizations, including Human Rights Watch, condemned the violence and repression of the opposition. In an alarming 37-page report titled “Creating Panic,” the organization cited political activists and their families who had been “falsely implicated” in cases of corruption and violence. A similar pattern was observed during the 2024 elections, when the opposition was in no position to contest.
Concerned about political freedom and human rights, the U.S. State Department, in a press statement on July 9, 2024, noted that “the United States supports the people of Bangladesh and their aspirations for democracy, freedom of peaceful assembly, and freedom of expression.” However, the statement went on: “The United States remains concerned by the arrests of thousands of political opposition members and by reports of irregularities on election day. The United States shares the view with other observers that these elections were not free or fair, and we regret that not all parties participated.” This was by far the strongest statement from the United States condemning Hasina’s disregard for democratic norms.
Hasina has been in office since 2009, and over the last 15 years of Awami League rule, she has been credited with raising Bangladesh’s economic profile, particularly by bolstering the ready-made garments industry, valued at US$47 billion in fiscal year 2022–2023. In 2023, Bangladesh’s GDP per capita reached its highest point in a decade at $2,529.5, surpassing India’s $2,484.8 and significantly outpacing Pakistan’s $1,407. While Bangladesh’s economic outlook has been praised globally, persistent violence and suppression of the opposition did not favor Hasina’s political legitimacy. She was accused of misusing her political power and government authority and disregarding the freedom of democratic institutions, such as the Election Commission and the judiciary.
The third reason for Hasina’s downfall is the romanticization of Bangladesh’s war of independence, even after 50 years. By keeping the memory of the 1971 war alive, Hasina reminded the nation of the great sacrifices made by her father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. Hasina identified herself with her father’s legacy. The 1971 Liberation War was the cornerstone of the Bangladeshi nation, and by romanticizing this history, she attempted to bolster her own and the party’s image. This romanticization closely mirrors the Communist regime in China, where almost all leaders in the past seven decades have romanticized Mao’s peasant revolution.
What does the interim government reflect?
After Hasina’s resignation, the student protesters expressed their preference for Yunus to lead the interim government. They seem to have regarded him as a neutral candidate with significant experience in governance and economy, earning both respect and criticism across party lines. The army may have agreed to the 84-year-old Nobel laureate to lead the interim government to counter allegations of democratic backsliding coming from the West during Hasina’s tenure. However, some claim that Yunus was appointed at the behest of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency – a typical “foreign hand” accusation often used in South Asia.
In addition to Yunus, the interim government initially included 17 advisers and later it was expanded to 21, including a former governor of the Reserve Bank of Bangladesh, several legal experts, a retired army brigadier, a former foreign secretary, women’s and Indigenous rights activists, bankers, academics, a medical practitioner, an Islamic studies expert, and two student leaders from the ADSM. The government has attempted to project an image of gender inclusiveness, with 25% of members (four advisers) being women.
What is worrying is the resurgence of political vendettas against the Awami League by Islamic fundamentalists in politics and governance. For instance, the inclusion of advisers such as A. F. Hassan Ariff – who served as attorney general of Bangladesh (2001–2005) under the BNP-led government and as an adviser to the interim government from 2008 to 2009 – may push for the political prosecution of Awami League. The inclusion of A. F. M. Khalid Hossain – a professor of Islamic studies and Nayab-e-Amir (administrator) of the Hifazat-e-Islam (Protectorate of Islam or Hifazat), an organization known for advocating Islamic laws in governance and politics – may signal the return of Islamic fundamentalism in governance. He has been appointed as an adviser to the Ministry of Religious Affairs.
Hifazat was formed in 2010 to protest the proposed Women Development Policy advocating women’s rights and safety, which was introduced soon after Hasina entered office in 2009. In 2013, Hifazat was said to be involved in the killing of a young blogger for reportedly writing a blasphemous post on Islam. Hifazat’s list of demands included a stronger blasphemy law and 12 other demands, including cancellation of the Women Development Policy. Under Hasina’s administration, Hifazat’s activities were scrutinized by the security agencies. With Hifazat now in power, a greater push for Islamic laws in governance may be on the agenda.
Interestingly, Jamaat-e-Islami (hereafter Jamaat) – the oldest Islamist political party in Bangladesh, which advocates for the implementation of Islamic law in the country – reopened its office on August 6 after having been shut since 2011. Jamaat was founded in 1941 in British India and has faced legal restrictions in Bangladesh, including a ban on its participation in elections in 2013 and 2024. The party has been controversial because of its opposition to independence in 1971 and alleged involvement in war crimes during the Liberation War. In 2016, Jamaat’s head, Motiur Rahman Nizami, was hanged for war crimes committed during the 1971 Liberation War. With Jamaat’s return, fears of a resurgence of Islamic fundamentalism loom large – a trend that Hasina was able to manage to maintain the country’s secular image.
Challenges Facing the Interim Government
Ensuring law and order and a peaceful transition.
The army has been brought in to manage the law and order situation because the police, who should be responsible for internal security, have been attacked for their stringent actions against protesters. Protesters have reportedly set police stations on fire, and police personnel have been beaten to death. Following these attacks, police officers expressed concerns for their safety and refused to resume their duties at full capacity. As a result, the army was deployed across many districts in Bangladesh.
The United Nations’ Preliminary Analysis of Recent Protests and Unrest in Bangladesh cites more than 600 killings reported between July 16 and August 11, with 250 deaths on August 4 and 5 alone – the key days of the protests. At least 32 children were reported dead in this violent episode. Supporters of the Awami League were allegedly targeted and their houses set on fire in the aftermath of Hasina’s exit.
As of August 23, more than 50 legal cases have been filed against Hasina over the deaths of students, including 42 murder cases. Several corruption cases have been filed against the leaders of the Awami League, including key advisers to the Hasina government. Reports also suggest that Awami League supporters and officials in the Hasina government have gone underground, fearing retribution by opposition groups, mainly the BNP and Jamaat.
Of primary concern are attacks on members of the Hindu minority community, who have long been seen as supporters of the Awami League. The party has historically championed secularism and syncretism, reflecting its roots in the Bengali nationalist movement that prioritized cultural unity over religious divides. There have been reports of attacks on Hindu temples and other minority religious establishments across Bangladesh, prompting civilians to come out to protect these buildings.
As a result of the sentimental and religious attachment of India’s majority Hindu population, Delhi has repeatedly reminded the interim government of the importance of ensuring the safety of Hindus in Bangladesh. In his congratulatory tweet on the appointment of the new interim government, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi urged Bangladesh to “ensure the safety and protection of Hindus.”
In a letter to Yunus on August 16, UN General Secretary António Guterres congratulated the chief adviser on his new role and advocated for “bringing an end to the violence, ensuring accountability, restoring law and order and charting a course towards democratic elections” and recommended “an inclusive approach, including taking into account the voices of the youth and women.” In particular, Guterres urged the interim government to ensure the inclusion of “minority and Indigenous communities.” To further UN efforts to ensure human rights and to investigate the violence that occurred between July and August, a three-member UN team was sent to Dhaka on August 23.
Safeguarding the spirit of the student-led “second liberation” of Bangladesh.
Although the interim government has promised to create jobs, ensure merit-based equal opportunity in government jobs, and hold elections soon, the chances that groups and political parties that were dismantled under the Hasina administration will influence the government along different lines are higher. For instance, the BNP and Jamaat might want to continue the current setup until they revitalize their party organization, cadres, membership, and leadership.
With the BNP and Jamaat gaining political space, concerns about the sustainability of the country’s secular image are growing. These parties may seek to exploit the current political instability to push for policies that align with their ideological agendas, potentially undermining the nation’s secular foundation. This could involve attempts to influence education, law, and public discourse, steering the country away from secular principles. From 2006 to 2009, Jamaat was actively involved in violent activities, especially in 2008, when the International Crimes Tribunal – a domestic body formed to adjudicate crimes against humanity during the 1971 Liberation War – began holding trials of individuals and organizations who sided with Pakistan and unleashed violence against their own people. This history shows the possibility that Jamaat could exploit the current situation.
Ensuring institutional freedom and autonomy in governance.
There is no doubt that the Bangladesh Army’s top brass has been involved in determining the structure, members, and representation in the interim government. However, the army’s readiness to cede power and authority over institutions to the Yunus-led interim government will be crucial to ensure a peaceful transition to a democratically elected government. In light of Bangladesh’s history of military coups and hostility toward the elected government over the past 50 years, the possibility of the army taking full control of the country remains, especially if it is in the driver’s seat.
Despite Yunus’s differences with Prime Minister Hasina in the past decade and a half, he is still respected by some members of the Awami League. His fallout with Hasina began in 2007, when Yunus announced the formation of a third-front political party named Nagarik Shakti (People’s Power), to which Hasina objected. She successfully lobbied for him to drop the idea. Yunus may have had problems with Hasina, but he admired Bangabandhu and the freedom fighters of 1971. While Yunus will try to preserve the legacy of the Liberation War amid vandalism of historical monuments belonging to liberation history, including statues of Bangabandhu, striking a balance between anti-liberation forces, army diktats, and secular forces will be challenging.
Amid growing violence, the possibility of fresh elections is unlikely in the immediate future. Those in power now, including the army, may want to remain so for some time. But if elections are held soon, there is a greater possibility that the Awami League could be banned or dismantled, its members and supporters imprisoned, and party cadres increasingly attacked – just as the Awami League did to the opposition during its time in power. This scenario could lead to another wave of political violence in Bangladesh.
In addition, the parties that are now coming to power, especially the BNP and Jamaat, seem to be pushing to appoint their own people to institutions like the Election Commission and the judiciary to execute their agenda. For instance, on August 10, Chief Justice Obaidul Hassan, a Hasina loyalist, was forced to resign. While this may signal a revolution, the forced resignations raise a fundamental question: is the country repeating old patterns of appointing loyalists, just as they criticize Hasina for doing? And, will running a country by “mobocracy” or populism be suitable for ensuring institutional autonomy and maintaining a stable democracy? The answer is probably no.
Investigating the crimes.
Much violence and arson was committed by and against the protesters, including students, political parties (Awami League, Jamaat, BNP, etc.), civilians, extremist forces, the police, and the army. In line with existing local and international human rights mechanisms, including the UN conventions, investigating crimes in a timely, fair, and accountable manner will be critical to delivering justice to the victims. Bangladesh has a poor track record of managing political violence during elections, and especially ensuring that the violence is not repeated, making it difficult to safeguard its image in international forums.
Bangladesh’s Foreign Policy
Foreign policy will be a crucial for the interim government. The immediate challenge will be to ensure stable ties with neighboring India. From sharing “deep-rooted bonds of history, language, culture, a multitude of other commonalities” to India’s vital historical role in Bangladesh’s independence from Pakistan in 1971, the two countries have come a long way. Under Hasina’s leadership, the relationship between India and Bangladesh became stronger. However, when the military or the BNP and its allies were in power, suspicion arose in India and the country was accused of openly supporting Hasina and the Awami League. Today, this perception that Delhi’s influence is linked primarily to the Awami League may play a spoiler in normalizing bilateral ties.
In the immediate aftermath of August 5, Yunus conveyed his displeasure with India’s position on the protests and emphasized that it is an internal matter for Bangladesh. But India has been put on the spot by providing a safe haven to Hasina after her resignation. Political groups such as the BNP are asking India to return Hasina. In a press statement, a joint secretary general of the BNP added, “We want to maintain a good relationship with the people of India. Please arrest Sheikh Hasina and Sheikh Rehana, who fled the country, and send them back to Bangladesh. Sheikh Hasina has killed many people in Bangladesh.” The BNP cited the 2013 India-Bangladesh Extradition Extradition Treaty as requiring her return for cases filed against the former prime minister in Bangladesh, including murder cases, which qualify under Article 2(a) of the treaty.
However, Article 8 of the treaty provides immunity against extradition if a person “satisfies the Requested State that it would, having regard to all the circumstances, be unjust or oppressive to extradite him by reasons of…the accusation not having or been made in good faith in the interests of justice.” India is unlikely to extradite Hasina to Bangladesh, especially considering her long-standing close relationship with India, which was a significant ally during her time in power.
India must walk a tightrope to better its ties with Bangladesh’s new leaders. The interim government already has a strong anti-India voice in Hifazat-e-Islam, which is known to have supported the “India-out” campaign earlier this year. Even if Yunus makes a concerted effort to use his personal experience with India’s top leadership to improve bilateral ties, the chances of his advisers sabotaging the relationship are even greater, primarily because of Delhi’s alleged support for the Hasina regime.
According to Bangladesh watchers in India, Delhi has taken a massive risk by hosting Hasina, especially when the tides have turned against her in Bangladesh and the friendly Awami League is facing an existential crisis. In a suo motu statement on Bangladesh in the Indian parliament on August 6, Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar apprised legislators of the situation in Bangladesh.
India’s concerns center on the safety of minorities, particularly Hindus, who are reportedly being targeted by the BNP and Jamaat cadre. Support for Hindus in Bangladesh is a concern for India’s majority Hindu electorate and for the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. However, Islamic fundamentalist forces in Bangladesh may continue to target Hindus to hurt India. They may view Hindus as symbolic of India’s influence in the region due to the historical and cultural connections between the two nations. Also, India’s advocacy for the protection of minorities in Bangladesh has been perceived by these extremists as external meddling, further incentivizing them to retaliate by targeting Hindus as a means to challenge India directly.
India shares a long border with Bangladesh, which nonstate actors have historically used for “illicit drug trafficking, fake currency, human trafficking” and terror activities. A 2018 report by the International Crisis Group highlighted concerns about the activities of terror groups in Bangladesh during the BNP’s Zia-led coalition government (2001–2006). According to the report, these groups, which had links to several international terror organizations, reportedly used Bangladesh as a safe haven. They were allegedly involved in attacks against foreign nations and carried out attacks in India. The presence and activities of these groups raised significant security concerns for India. Hasina was undoubtedly a strong partner with Delhi in counterterrorism efforts, particularly against extremist Islamic groups.
Fearing that Islamic extremists might reemerge following Hasina’s exit, India has taken steps to heighten security along its border with Bangladesh. This includes alerting and possibly reinforcing border forces to prevent any spillover of extremist activities and ensure border security. Foreign Minister Jaishankar has alerted border forces “to be exceptionally alert in view of this complex situation.” But India could face the same situation it faced 50 years ago – the influx of millions of Bangladeshi Hindus fleeing to the bordering regions of West Bengal and Tripura, fearing prosecution. The arrival of significant numbers of refugees would create a significant challenge for India to manage.
Amid mounting concerns, Prime Minister Modi congratulated Yunus “on assuming his new responsibilities.” He added, “We hope for an early return to normalcy, ensuring the safety and protection of Hindus and all other minority communities … [and] India remains committed to working with Bangladesh to fulfill the shared aspirations of both our peoples for peace, security and development.” On August 16, Modi spoke to Yunus by telephone and reiterated his call for the safety of the “Hindus and all other minority communities” in Bangladesh.
The good news is that India accepts the new political situation in Bangladesh. Even if nothing but permanent interests dominate bilateral or multilateral engagements, India would not wish to lose a huge neighboring market. Bangladesh is India’s biggest trade partner in South Asia, while India is Bangladesh’s second-largest trading partner (second to China). But it will be crucial for India to ensure that its advocacy for minorities in Bangladesh is taken in good faith, considering the BNP and Jamaat may exploit this stance to fuel anti-India sentiment or to gain political leverage by portraying India as interfering in Bangladesh’s internal affairs.
India the largest destination for Bangladesh exports, amounting to $2 billion in fiscal year 2022–2023, while bilateral trade stood at $15.9 billion. Interestingly, India-Bangladesh trade ties, unlike those with other South Asian countries, are not one way, making dependence a factor in the relationship. Apart from trade, connectivity, investments, and energy are vital pillars of cooperation between the two countries. While the current situation in Bangladesh might impact trade through rising security protocols on the border and disruptions in production, it will be interesting to see how eager India is to continue the momentum, even as it hosts Hasina.
China has also responded to developments in Bangladesh. In a statement on August 6, the Chinese Foreign Ministry noted that “China is following closely the developments in Bangladesh. As a friendly neighbour and comprehensive strategic cooperative partner of Bangladesh, China sincerely hopes that social stability will be restored soon.” China is unlikely to express anything beyond these formal lines. Certainly, China saw Bangladesh draw closer to India under Hasina – but that does not mean Beijing’s relations with Dhaka did not grow during the same period. Hasina managed a balanced outlook in which trade and investments took primacy. Bangladesh was among the first countries in India’s neighborhood to join the Belt and Road Initiative in 2016.
Bangladesh’s trade trajectory with China has been transformed in the last decade. When Hasina entered office in 2009, bilateral trade accounted for $3.3 billion; by her third term in office, it reached more than $20 billion in 2022. Chinese investment in Bangladesh exceeds $38 billion. In recent years, defense cooperation has become a vital pillar of bilateral ties, with China becoming Bangladesh’s primary supplier of light weapons. It also assisted Bangladesh with $1.2 billion for the first submarine dry base in its Cox’s Bazar region. The transformation in the bilateral relationship is significant, considering that China opposed the creation of an independent Bangladesh and supported Pakistan in 1971.
For China, Bangladesh’s critical location in the Bay of Bengal is the primary factor in this transformation. As the great powers have fought Chinese expansionism in the Indo-Pacific region, Beijing has attempted to deepen ties with regional players that cannot afford to choose sides, whether with the West, China, India, or Japan. At the same time, as Bangladesh has sought investments across geographies and political systems, it has looked to deepen its ties with China despite mounting pressure from Delhi.
With its foreign policy based on “cooperation with all and malice to none,” Bangladesh has achieved a good balance with neighbors and partners. For example, in 2023, it drafted its own “Indo-Pacific Outlook” instead of joining the vision of the United States and its allies in the region. Bangladesh’s outlook focused exploring economic opportunities, safeguarding sea lanes of communication, and maintaining peace and stability in the region – but did not refer at all to China.
For many observers in India and the West, China may be the biggest beneficiary of Bangladesh’s current political challenges. Given China’s track record of leveraging political instability to its advantage, the situation could open the door for Beijing to assert its economic and strategic influence in the country and the region. Considering that the new regime in Bangladesh may have to take an anti-India stance because of Delhi’s long-standing support for Hasina and its resentment of Islamic fundamentalist parties, there is no better choice than China since it is the mightiest regional power and presents a plethora of economic opportunities.
China comes with little historical baggage, despite having supported Pakistan in the 1971 war, and it has no problem interacting across party lines, whether extremist Islamic or secular. This contrasts with India’s consistent choice to engage secular forces to support the Hindu minority in maintaining its cultural and religious identity in a diverse and pluralistic society.
However, China could also opt for a wait-and-see strategy while it ensures its investments in Bangladesh are safe. Currently, nearly 1,000 Chinese companies are involved in infrastructure projects in Bangladesh, including energy, roads, and bridges. Soon after Hasina’s resignation, the Global Times, a Chinese state media outlet, reported that “Chinese businesses have rolled out contingency measures, including asking employees not to go out unless necessary, stockpile daily necessities, and temporarily suspend projects, amid weeks of protests in Bangladesh.”
Chinese investments in Bangladesh carry immediate risks, requiring swift guarantees from the interim government for their functioning and safety. Beijing’s political commitment to the new political regime may invite targeted attacks on Chinese investments from the ousted Awami League. China’s risk aversion suggests that it hopes political stability will prevail. Meanwhile, the Chinese envoy to Bangladesh met the BNP delegation on August 21, reiterating China’s support for Bangladesh. The envoy in his meeting with BNP stakeholders sought their commitment to the “one-China principle” and safeguarding China’s interests, including investments.
Following his meetings with the BNP delegation, Ambassador Yao Wen also met with the Yunus on August 25, conveying “No matter what changes have taken place in the domestic situation of Bangladesh, China’s commitment to develop China-Bangladesh relations remains unchanged.” On September 2, Wen held talks with the Jamaat leaders at their office, which was reopened the very next day of Hasina’s exit. In his remarks to the media in the presence of Jamaat leaders, Yao told that “Jamaat-e-Islami is a disciplined party. The people of China want friendly relations with the people of Bangladesh. We will continue to work for the development, progress and prosperity of Bangladesh in the future.” The chronology of these meeting clearly exhibits Beijing’s strategy of engaging with potential actors who may make a comeback in the next government. These moves suggest that China is betting on the opposition’s return to power, especially since the Awami League has gone underground following Hasina’s exit.
Navigating diplomatic relations beyond India and China, the interim government in Bangladesh faces significant hurdles in engaging with the United States. Washington was a strong critic of Bangladesh’s political landscape under Hasina, pointing to anti-democratic tendencies, authoritarianism, and human rights concerns. If the interim government continues with the same tendencies—such as conducting unfair elections or allowing the military to play a significant role in civilian administration—it is likely that the U.S. will maintain its critical stance. The challenges in U.S.-Bangladesh relations, therefore, rise not just from specific leadership but from structural issues that undermine democratic governance and human rights, regardless of who is in power.
The U.S. position on democratic developments has been constant since the 2018 elections in Bangladesh. The U.S. State Department raised concerns about electoral irregularities that “prevented some people from voting, which undermined faith in the electoral process.” The United States took a similar position on the 2024 elections, “concerned by the arrests of thousands of political opposition members and by reports of irregularities on elections day… [and] these elections were not free or fair and we regret that not all parties participated.”
Despite recent criticisms of Bangladesh’s elections and democracy, the White House seems to have softened its approach to engaging with the country, as it remains a crucial partner in the Indo-Pacific. In a rare event, President Joe Biden penned a letter to Hasina on February 6 – just after she began her fourth term – conveying the “sincere” desire of his “administration to continue our work together on regional and global security, economic development, climate change and energy, global health, humanitarian support, especially for Rohingya refugees, and more.” Biden assured Hasina of the U.S. commitment to supporting “Bangladesh’s ambitious economic goals and partnering with Bangladesh on our shared vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific.”
Logically, the United States was right to reset the tone of the relationship and seek to engage rather than letting anti-American sentiment grow in Bangladesh. Following President Biden’s letter to Prime Minister Hasina, Donald Lu, assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asian Affairs, visited Dhaka in May 2024 on his tour of the subcontinent. Lu’s visit aligned with Biden’s letter, pointing out that the United States and Bangladesh share a vision of an “Indo-Pacific region that is free and open, connected, prosperous, secure and resilient” and rebuilding ties. However, Lu’s visit to Bangladesh was marred by controversies and criticized by Awami League leaders.
In a press briefing, the Awami League’s general secretary added, “We didn’t invite him[;] rather he has come to this country because of their different needs.” This statement may have been a reaction to Lu’s emphasis on Bangladesh’s human rights record. In a follow-up to Lu’s visit, the United States introduced a new visa policy for Bangladesh under Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which restricts the “issuance of visas for any Bangladeshi individual, believed to be responsible for, or complicit in, undermining the democratic election process in Bangladesh.” Having criticized the Awami League in the past on such grounds, the new visa policy certainly marked a new low in bilateral ties.
Despite the negativity of these statements, the Hasina government made great strides with the United States in trade, investment, and security. The United States has been a major trade partner of Bangladesh, with trade accounting for $13,243 million in 2021–2022 and U.S. direct investment in Bangladesh estimated at $695 million in 2022. On the security cooperation front, since 2014, the United States has allocated $78.45 million in foreign military financing, with $54.8 million earmarked for bilateral programs and $23.6 million for the Bay of Bengal Initiative. The Bangladesh Navy has been a part of the U.S. Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training program since 2010; this weeklong program is aimed at enhancing “collaboration focused ion shared maritime security challenges in the region.”
Yunus has been dismissive of U.S. pressure. In an interview with local media in Bangladesh in June 2024, Yunus stated bluntly, “I don’t care what the West wants. What matters is whether we want democracy, human rights and freedom of the press. If they want what we want, it is a matter of happiness. If they don’t want it, we will continue to want it. Why let it be imposed on us like them?” He added, “It doesn’t matter when or what they said. Each country will formulate its foreign policy according to its own rules.”
Despite Yunus’s past remarks about the United States, he is favored by the Democratic Party, as reflected in a January 22 letter from 12 U.S. senators urging Hasina to “end the persistent harassment of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Professor Muhammad Yunus – and the pattern of abusing laws and the justice system to target critics of the government more broadly.” As a leader with a better global image, Yunus will face the significant task of resetting ties with the United States and addressing contentious human rights issues.
Meanwhile, the United States is alleged to have had a role in toppling Hasina’s government. An unconfirmed statement by Hasina has circulated in the Indian media claiming that the United States orchestrated her removal because she refused to surrender the sovereignty of Saint Martin Island, located in the northeastern Bay of Bengal. The tiny island has strategic importance because of its proximity to major shipping lanes and potential offshore resources, making it a point of interest for the United States’ regional security and economic influence. Had the United States made such a demand, it would have gone too far in pushing Dhaka.
Indeed, like every great power, the United States seeks to increase its outreach in the Indo-Pacific, but not when the cost is too high – such as toppling an elected government. Difference makes partnerships grow and improve, but baseless accusations are outlandish. The State Department has firmly refuted such claims, calling them “laughable … any implication that the United States was involved in Sheikh Hasina’s resignation is absolutely false. We have seen a lot of disinformation in recent weeks, and we remain incredibly committed to strengthening information integrity across the digital ecosystem, especially with our partners in South Asia.” Considering that the two countries have spent decades developing multisector cooperation, especially with respect to tackling terrorism, staging something of this sort would be a serious political blunder on the United States’ part.
Where does the Islamic world stand on the unfolding situation in Bangladesh – an Islamic nation?
Bangladesh has had a love-hate relationship with the Islamic world, especially the Awami League’s version of Islam, which is primarily secular and culturally rich. It is noteworthy that no country in the Islamic world, including Saudi Arabia – a vital member of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) – supported Pakistan during the 1971 Liberation War. There was a widespread belief among Islamic countries that the war was India’s strategy to split Pakistan in two and create the separate nation of Bangladesh.
Bangladesh became a member of the OIC in 1974, marking the beginning of a fresh partnership with the Islamic world. That relationship has evolved in trade, investment, and cultural and religious exchanges over the last five decades. Bangladesh also receives significant remittances from expatriate workers in the Middle East, which plays a crucial role in its economy. Bangladesh collaborates with other Islamic countries on a variety of issues, including trade, education, and humanitarian efforts, demonstrating a united front in addressing global challenges facing the Muslim world, including solidarity in supporting Palestine.
Despite this strong working relationship, no major statement has come from the countries of the Islamic world (as of August 10) except for Pakistan and Malaysia; Islamabad expressed hope for a “peaceful and swift return to normalcy,” while Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim welcomed the new government on behalf of Kuala Lumpur, with sly appreciation for the student-led movement against the Hasina government, adding “As a new dawn rises over Bangladesh, bringing forth a renewal driven by the vigour and vision of its youth…at this pivotal moment in history, I wish the people of Bangladesh every success and the brightest of futures.”
Meanwhile, at this pressing moment, the question is whether Hasina will find support or asylum in any Islamic country. Reports suggest that amid immigration-related chaos in the United Kingdom, the chances of her application getting attention in London may be slim. Therefore, she may think of several Islamic countries, such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which have historically provided refuge to exiled leaders because of their religious and political affiliations. However, where she eventually settles remains to be seen.
The Way Forward
As the situation in Bangladesh remains volatile, Yunus will have a tough time navigating the multiple power centers with the army in the powerful position and Islamic parties attempting to amend the country’s laws and constitution, especially with respect to religious freedom and women. There will be attempts to hijack the national glory of the 1971 Liberation War. This has already started with the declaration that there would be no public holiday on August 15 – a day traditionally observed as National Mourning Day, introduced by the Hasina government in 1996 to mark the assassination of her father and his family members on August 15, 1975.
The influence of nonstate actors and the potential interference from countries like Pakistan, which may seek to exploit their Jamaat connections to revisit grievances from 1971, must also be addressed. Furthermore, there is a risk that Pakistan and China might use Bangladesh as a conduit to export instability to India, which would require a response from Delhi. The ongoing Rohingya crisis and instability in Myanmar add further complexity to the situation, requiring diplomatic and humanitarian strategies to manage the refugee situation and regional tensions.
It is essential that the interim government prevent a repeat of the past by ensuring that what Hasina did to the opposition is not replicated by the opposition – the BNP and Jamaat – against the Awami League. Failure to do so would only perpetuate the cycle of violence. Additionally, the administration must ensure that the movement initiated by students remains true to its roots and is not co-opted by other forces. Lastly, holding fresh elections will be vital to avoiding a constant tug-of-war among stakeholders.
Long Island’s 13th India Day Parade Celebrates 78th Independence Day with Record Participation and Enthusiastic Celebrations
The 13th annual India Day Parade took place in Hicksville, New York, on August 25, marking a vibrant celebration of India’s 78th Independence Day. The event, held along South Broadway, saw a record turnout, with tens of thousands of attendees, as well as an impressive 50 marching groups and 11 elaborate floats. The parade was organized by IDP USA, and this year’s event was noted for its grandeur and scale, surpassing previous parades according to the organizers.
The parade was a spectacular display of Indian culture and patriotism, featuring a variety of floats that captivated the crowd. Among these were replicas of iconic Indian landmarks, including the Golden Temple in Amritsar and the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, the latter of which was consecrated earlier this year by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. A float dedicated to Lord Ganesha was also featured, along with others representing various organizations such as the Arya Samaj of Long Island and LIPAC. The parade also saw a surprising and much-appreciated participation by the Hicksville School Marching Band, along with 25 motorcycle riders, both of which were major highlights for the spectators.
The event was a “grand success,” as described in the press release by IDP USA. The organization, led by co-Presidents Vimal Goyal and Deepak Bansal, along with their team and Nassau County Human Rights Commission Chair Dr. Bobby Kumar Kalotee, worked tirelessly to ensure the event’s success. Their efforts were clearly reflected in the smooth execution and the large-scale participation that the parade witnessed.
The parade was graced by several prominent personalities, adding to its appeal. Actress and politician Jaya Prada Nahata, along with actress Neetu Chandra, served as the Celebrity Grand Marshals, drawing significant attention and delighting their fans. Dr. Urmilesh Arya took on the role of the Community Grand Marshal, further emphasizing the event’s community-driven spirit. India’s Consul General in New York, Binaya S. Pradhan, was represented by Vishal Jayesh Bhai Harsh, Consul (Economy, HOC & CPIO), and Anurag. Other notable figures included Harry Singh Bolla of Bolla Oil, Shudh Prakash Singh, and Dr. Jay Sarkar, who were honored as Chief Guests.
The event was not just a parade but a celebration that brought together a diverse group of dignitaries and elected officials. Those who addressed the enthusiastic crowd included Congressman Anthony D’Esposito, New York State Senate members Steve Rhoads and Jack Martins, Town of Oyster Bay Supervisor Joseph Saladino, Town of North Hempstead Supervisor Jennifer DeSena, Nassau County Legislator Rose Marie Walker, and Town of North Hempstead Town Clerk Ragini Srivastava, among others. Their presence underscored the significance of the event, which not only celebrated India’s independence but also highlighted the strong ties between the Indian-American community and local leaders.
The parade was characterized by a lively atmosphere filled with patriotic fervor. Throughout the route, attendees waved the Indian tricolor and chanted slogans such as ‘Bharat Mata ki Jai’ and ‘Jai Hind,’ creating an environment of unity and national pride. The celebrations extended beyond the parade, culminating in a large gathering at the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) parking lot, where over 55 booths were set up, attracting a continuous stream of visitors.
One of the event’s most appreciated aspects was the provision of free, delicious meals to all attendees, a gesture by IDP USA that was widely praised. Additionally, Bolla Market set up free carnival games for children, further enhancing the family-friendly nature of the event. The afternoon was filled with entertainment, featuring performances of popular Bollywood and Punjabi songs by well-known artists like Rex D’Souza and his live band, Indian Idol Khuda Baksh, and Bhangra King Sarabjeet Cheema. Their performances kept the crowd engaged and added to the celebratory mood.
The event also saw spontaneous celebrations near the stage, where several members of the IDP Team, including Chairman Bobby Kalotee, President Vimal Goyal, Past Presidents Jay Jasbir Singh and Indu Jaiswal, Senior Vice Presidents Nilima Madan and Bina Sabapathy, along with many team members and other participants, danced with joy. Their lively participation was a testament to the community’s deep connection to the event and their shared pride in celebrating India’s independence.
The 13th India Day Parade in Long Island was a resounding success, marked by record participation, vibrant cultural displays, and enthusiastic community involvement. The event not only celebrated India’s 78th Independence Day but also showcased the rich cultural heritage of the Indian-American community in Long Island, creating lasting memories for all who attended.
AAPI’s Global Health Summit 2024Planned tobe Held in New Delhi, India
GHS will focus on: Prevention Strategies for Cancer and Heart Attacks, Role of Lifestyle Changes, and the Integration of Technology into Healthcare
(Chicago, IL: September 3rd, 2024) The growing influence of physicians of Indian heritage is evident, as they are increasingly recognized and hold critical positions in healthcare, academic, research, and administrative positions across the United States. Their hard work, dedication, compassion, and skills have carved out an enviable niche in the American medical community.
Not satisfied with their professional growth and the service they provide to their patients around the world, they are at the forefront, sharing their knowledge and expertise with others, especially those physicians and leaders in the medical field from India.
The 18th edition of the annual Global Healthcare Summit (GHS) 2024, organized by the Association of American Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) in New Delhi India from October 18-20, 2024, offers a unique forum for them to come together, share their knowledge and expertise in their respective medical fields with their fellow physicians from around the world, and to learn from one another.
“GHS 2024 will focus on Prevention Strategies for Cancer and Heart Attacks, Role of Lifestyle Changes, and Integration of Technology in Healthcare,” said Dr. Satheesh Kathula, President of AAPI. “AAPI has been engaged in harnessing the power of Indian Diaspora to bring the most innovative, efficient, cost-effective healthcare and preventable solutions to India. This international health care summit is a progressive transformation from the first Indo-US Healthcare Summit launched by AAPI USA in 2007.”
Honorable Prime Minister of India Shri Narendra Modi has been invited to deliver the Keynote Address at the Inaugural Ceremony on October 19th. Honorable Health Minister of India, Shri Jagat Prakash Nadda is expected to be the Chief Guest at the GHS and deliver an address on national prevention strategies.
For the first time ever, visits to the new Parliament House in New Delhi, visits to the offices and meetings with the Prime Minister and Health Minister as well as a visit to the Rashtra Pati Bhavan are also planned for the AAPI delegates, who will be part of this historic event in the nation’s Capital.
GHS will have the highest caliber of internationally acclaimed faculty and will develop a very robust agenda in collaboration with leading experts from India. CME sessions with academicians from India and the USwill offer unique opportunities for local medical staff and healthcare professionals to advance leanings and provide the best possible care for the people of India.
The scientific program and workshops of GHS are being developed by leading experts with contributions by the Scientific Advisory Board and the International Scientific Committee. The workshops will be led by world famous physicians on topics relevant to the needs of the time.
According to Dr. Sunil Kaza, Chairman of AAPI’s Borad of Trustees, “AAPI will work collaboratively with leading academic medical colleges in New Delhi benefitingMedical Students, Residents, Fellows and Junior Doctors.With the objective of enabling people in India to access high quality, affordable, and cost-effective world class health services, the Summit being organized in collaboration with the Indian Medical Association (IMA), the Ministry of Health, and several prominent Medical Colleges in India, will have participation from some of the world’s most well-known physicians and industry leaders.”
Describing the message and theme for the Summit, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, President-Elect of AAPI says, “AAPI has a mandate to help disseminate our medical knowledge, our expertise and technological advances to the rest of the world, and to India in particular. Headquartered in Chicago, AAPI has come to be recognized as a strong voice in the healthcare legislation and policy arena.”
“With the changing trends and statistics in healthcare, both in India and US, we are refocusing our mission and vision of GHS2024, AAPI would like to make a positive meaningful impact on the healthcare in India,” Dr. Kathula says. “In our quest to fulfill the mission of AAPI, we are proud to share best practice and experiences from leading experts in the world and develop actionable plans for launching demonstration projects that enable access to affordable and quality healthcare for all people. To help accomplish this mission, join us at the GHS 2024 in New Delhi.” For more information on Global Health Summit 2024, please visit https://aapisummit.org
Announcing the 2024 Asia 21 Next Generation Fellows
Please join us in welcoming The 2024 Asia 21 Next Generation Fellows.
Our last email featured a link to the 2023 cohort, and while we are always excited to share details about our Asia 21 alumni, please check out this year’s fellows and join us in welcoming them!
Class of 2024
Avani Lekhara Overcomes Adversity to Secure Third Paralympic Gold in Paris
Five months ahead of the Paris Paralympics, Avani Lekhara, a 22-year-old shooter from Rajasthan, underwent surgery to remove gallbladder stones. This health issue had been a source of significant discomfort and had negatively impacted her training routine. Consequently, in March, Avani opted for surgery to resolve the issue.
Her father, Praveen Kumar Lekhara, was filled with relief when she clinched the gold medal in the women’s 10m Air Rifle Standing SH 1 final at the Chateauroux Shooting Range. This victory marked Avani’s third medal at the Paralympics, adding to the gold and bronze she had previously won at the Tokyo Paralympics three years prior.
“Avani had been struggling with gallbladder stones since 2023. The recurring pain in her stomach and waist made it difficult for her to train for the usual hours at the shooting range. She was determined to perform her best at the Paris Paralympics, so we decided to have the gallbladder removed in March this year. The recovery period was tough and took some time, but she has ended a challenging year with a remarkable achievement,” Praveen shared with The Indian Express.
At the Tokyo Paralympics, Avani, then just 19, made history by becoming the second Indian athlete to win multiple medals in the same Paralympics, securing a gold in the women’s 10m air rifle SH 1 event and a bronze in the 50m 3P event in the same category.
The last Indian athlete to win more medals than Avani in a single Paralympic Games was Joginder Singh Sodhi, who won three medals at the 1984 Games.
Recalling the post-surgery challenges, her coach, Chandra Shekar, noted how difficult it was for Avani to return to shooting after her period of rest. “Avani competed in the New Delhi World Cup last year while enduring consistent pain, which hindered her progress. After the surgery, she was advised to rest for two months, and when she resumed training, her weakened muscles posed a significant challenge. We went back to basics, having her perform dry or shadow loading exercises. Initially, her body would shake due to weakened neuromuscular memory following her recovery. Once her neuromuscular memory fully returned, we increased the number of targets, and she was back on track before heading to Paris,” Shekar recalled.
Avani’s journey into shooting began following a tragic car accident in 2011 on the Jaipur-Dholpur highway. She was just 11 years old when the accident occurred, resulting in spinal cord injuries that left her paralyzed from the waist down. “After the accident, Avani spent over 90 days in SMS Hospital in Jaipur and then at the Indian Spinal Injury Centre in Delhi. It took her nearly three years to regain some strength. During this period, she found solace in watching dance performances on television and reading books,” her father recalled.
Three years after the accident, Avani began her shooting career at the Jagatpura Shooting Range and started training under coach Shekar in 2016 using a rented air rifle. Within a year, she was already making her mark by winning titles at para nationals and earning a silver medal at the WSPS World Cup in AL Ain and a bronze at the World Cup in Bangkok. Avani initially focused on the 10m air rifle event, but she soon expanded her repertoire to include the 50m rifle 3P SH 1 event.
“From the beginning, Avani’s greatest asset has been her mental strength, which has always driven her forward. I knew that we had to gradually build her physical strength. She started training with a Feinwerkbau junior rifle, and we worked on her shoulder positioning and finding the right balance with the rifle for the 10m air rifle event. In the 50m 3P event, where she needed to adapt to modified kneeling and prone positions due to her paraplegia, she required some time to adjust and find a suitable position,” coach Shekar explained.
At the Tokyo Paralympics, Avani won a bronze medal in the 50m 3P event just days after securing gold in the 10m air rifle event. Coach Shekar recalled her rigorous preparation for the demanding events: “The 10m air rifle event helped her significantly in the standing series. For the kneeling position, we had to help her adjust her elbow on the circular piece on the flat board, and initially, we focused on dry or shadow shooting before progressing to 20-30 shots,” he remembered.
In the past six years, Avani has also been training under her personal coach, Suma Shirur, a former national coach for the 10m Rifle Olympic events. Finding the right adjustments and load positions for Avani was a challenge. “Her mental strength enabled her to grasp the basics of shooting well. When we made adjustments to find the best-suited load position and established a stable base using her upper body for support—unlike a typical shooter who uses their feet for balance—it was a gradual process, but Avani was patient,” Shirur told The Indian Express earlier.
Avani secured India’s first Paralympic quota at the Para World Cup in Paris in 2022, setting a new world record score of 250.6 in the final. While she won a bronze at the Para Shooting World Cup in Delhi last year, her performance was hampered by persistent pain.
Looking ahead, Avani is set to compete in the 10m air rifle mixed team prone SH 1 event and the women’s 50m rifle 3P event in Paris. There is a possibility that she could match the historic achievement of Joginder Singh Sodhi, who won three medals in the 1984 Paralympics.
Semaglutide: A Potential Game-Changer for Aging and Health Beyond Diabetes
Semaglutide, a drug commonly prescribed for Type 2 diabetes and obesity, might also have significant effects on the aging process, according to recent research. Prof. Harlan Krumholz from the Yale School of Medicine has highlighted the broader benefits of semaglutide, known commercially as Ozempic, following the release of several new studies.
The recent studies suggest that semaglutide could be effective in managing a variety of conditions related to heart failure, arthritis, Alzheimer’s disease, and even cancer. Prof. Krumholz noted, “It wouldn’t surprise me that improving people’s health this way actually slows down the ageing process.” He shared this insight during the European Society of Cardiology Conference 2024, where these findings were presented.
Published in multiple medical journals, including the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), which Prof. Krumholz edits, the research underscores the drug’s transformative potential. Prof. Krumholz emphasized, “These ground-breaking medications are poised to revolutionise cardiovascular care and could dramatically enhance cardiovascular health.”
The studies, conducted as part of the Select trial, involved over 17,600 participants aged 45 and older. These individuals were either given 2.4 mg of semaglutide or a placebo over a period of more than three years. All participants were either obese or overweight and had cardiovascular disease but no diabetes.
The results revealed that those using semaglutide experienced a lower mortality rate from various causes, including cardiovascular issues and Covid-19. Specifically, the mortality rate from Covid-19 was 2.6% for those on semaglutide, compared to 3.1% for those receiving the placebo. This indicates that while the drug did not reduce the likelihood of contracting Covid-19, it did seem to improve survival rates.
Additionally, the drug demonstrated benefits across genders. While women experienced fewer major adverse cardiovascular events, semaglutide “consistently reduced the risk” of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in both men and women. The medication also alleviated heart failure symptoms and lowered inflammation levels, regardless of whether participants lost weight.
Dr. Benjamin Scirica, lead author of one of the studies and a professor of cardiovascular medicine at Harvard Medical School, noted, “The findings reinforce that overweight and obesity increases the risk of death due to many etiologies.” He further stated that these risks “can be modified with potent incretin-based therapies like semaglutide.”
Semaglutide is available as a prescription drug on the NHS, marketed under the brand names Wegovy for obesity and Ozempic for diabetes. It is administered via injection and functions by mimicking the hormone GLP-1, which helps users feel fuller and less hungry.
Despite its potential benefits, experts caution that semaglutide should not be seen as a substitute for a healthy diet and regular exercise. It is important that the medication be used under medical supervision, as it can cause side effects including nausea, upset stomach, bloating, and gas.
The research into semaglutide’s broader health impacts highlights its promising role not just in managing diabetes and obesity but also in potentially slowing the aging process and improving overall health.
Paris 2024 Paralympic Games Open with Spectacular Ceremony on Champs-Elysees
The Paris 2024 Paralympic Games began with a spectacular opening ceremony as athletes paraded down the iconic Champs-Elysees to Place de la Concorde, celebrating under perfect summer conditions. This marked a historic moment, as the ceremony, like the Olympic Games, was held outside of a stadium for the first time in Paris.
The main event took place at Place de la Concorde, located in the heart of the city. This was preceded by a grand parade along the Champs-Elysees, starting from the famous Arc de Triomphe. Organizers estimated that 65,000 people would attend the event. Spectators were able to watch the parade for free, while the concluding open-air event at Place de la Concorde required tickets.
This Paralympic Games is a milestone for France, as it is the first time the country has hosted a summer Paralympic Games. The sporting events kick off on Thursday, marking the start of 11 days filled with athletic action. Around 4,400 athletes from a record 168 delegations are expected to participate in 22 Paralympic sports, competing for a total of 549 gold medals in Paris.
Tony Estanguet, president of the Paris 2024 organizing committee, described the opening ceremony as the beginning of “the Paralympic revolution” led by the athletes. He expressed admiration for the athletes, stating, “What makes you revolutionaries is that, when they told you ‘no’, you continued.” He continued, “Tonight, you are inviting us to change our perspectives, change our attitudes, change our society to finally give every person their full place. Every emotion that you make us feel will carry a message that will never be forgotten: You have no limits, so let us stop imposing limits on you.”
The French delegation received a warm welcome at the Place de la Concorde, underscoring the ceremonial theme of a Paralympic ‘revolution’ that began in grand style. Artistic director Thomas Jolly had promised a spectacle that would highlight the Paralympic athletes and the values they represent. The choice to hold the event at Place de la Concorde, the largest square in Paris, symbolized the city’s commitment to promoting inclusivity for people with disabilities.
While the Olympic Games saw athletes traveling on boats down the River Seine in heavy rain, the Paralympic Games’ opening ceremony enjoyed a bright and sunny evening, with the athletes parading down the Champs-Elysees under golden skies.
The delegations made their way from the Champs-Elysees to Place de la Concorde. French former Paralympic swimmer Theo Curin was a standout performer during the opening segment. He transported athletes in a taxi adorned with Phryges, the Paris 2024 mascot modified for the Paralympics with a running blade. Several artistic displays, featuring performers with disabilities, highlighted societal issues around inclusivity. A central theme was the paradox of a world that claims to be inclusive but is still full of prejudice.
The Patrouille de France aerial display released blue, white, and red smoke to represent the Tricolore before the athletes arrived. French singer Christine and the Queens performed on the main stage at Place de la Concorde. The ceremony featured numerous artistic performances that set the stage for the event.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was in attendance, greeting the ParalympicsGB delegation as they arrived in a celebratory atmosphere. Athletes entered the venue against the stunning backdrop of a setting sun behind the Arc de Triomphe. Wheelchair tennis player Lucy Shuker and wheelchair basketball player Terry Bywater carried the British flag for ParalympicsGB, having been chosen as flagbearers by their teammates.
For the host nation, sprinter Nantenin Keita and Para-triathlete Alexis Hanquinquant had the honor of carrying the French flag. As the final delegation to enter Place de la Concorde, they were met with enthusiastic applause and a rendition of “Les Champs-Elysees.”
Following speeches from Tony Estanguet and International Paralympic Committee (IPC) president Andrew Parsons, French President Emmanuel Macron officially declared the Games open. Parsons remarked, “The Paris 2024 Paralympic Games will show persons with disabilities what they can achieve at the highest level. The fact that these opportunities largely exist only in sport in the year 2024 is shocking. It is proof that we can and must do more to advance disability. That is why 225 years on from when Place de la Concorde was central to the French Revolution, I hope that Paris 2024 starts a Paralympic revolution – the inclusion revolution.”
Twelve Paralympic champions participated in the flame parade, which concluded at the Jardin des Tuileries. There, the cauldron was lit by flagbearers Keita and Hanquinquant, alongside Charles Antoine Kouakou, Fabien Lamirault, and Elodie Lorandi. The ceremony concluded with the cauldron being lifted into the sky, followed by a spectacular fireworks display.
The Paralympic Games promise exciting competitions ahead, with IPC president Parsons predicting that Paris will host “the most spectacular Paralympic Games ever.” So far, two million tickets have been sold, with about 500,000 still available. Many venues from the Olympic Games are also being used for the Paralympics. Athletics will take place at Stade de France, swimming at La Defense Arena, wheelchair tennis at Roland Garros, and Para-equestrian events at the Chateau de Versailles.
The Para-triathlon will be held in central Paris, with the swimportion taking place in the River Seine. This comes after the men’s Olympic triathlon had to be delayed due to poor water quality.
As with the Olympics, Russia and Belarus are banned from participating due to the ongoing war in Ukraine, although some athletes from these countries are allowed to compete as part of the Neutral Paralympic Athletes (NPA) delegation.
For the first time, Eritrea, Kiribati, and Kosovo will be represented at the Paralympics, and eight athletes will compete as part of the Paralympic Refugee Team. Team ParalympicsGB will feature 215 athletes with a target of winning between 100 and 140 medals, as set by UK Sport.
The Games will be broadcast in the UK on Channel 4, with BBC Radio 5 Live providing commentary, updates, and dedicated programs. The BBC Sport website will also offer daily live text commentary.
On the opening day, there will be 22 gold medals up for grabs, presenting numerous opportunities for ParalympicsGB to win medals right from the start.
Biden and Modi Reaffirm Commitment to Peaceful Resolution in Russia-Ukraine Conflict
In a recent conversation, U.S. President Joe Biden and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed their commitment to a peaceful resolution of the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, emphasizing adherence to international law and the principles outlined in the United Nations (UN) Charter. The White House issued a statement on Monday following their phone discussion, underscoring the leaders’ mutual understanding on the importance of respecting Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty—key issues threatened by the ongoing Russian invasion that began in February 2022.
Prime Minister Modi shared details of their conversation through a post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. “Spoke to @POTUS @JoeBiden on phone today. We had a detailed exchange of views on various regional and global issues, including the situation in Ukraine. I reiterated India’s full support for early return of peace and stability,” Modi wrote. His use of “POTUS” referred to the President of the United States, while “@POTUS” is Biden’s official account on the social media platform.
Modi’s comments highlighted the discussions about the Ukraine conflict, in which both leaders expressed the need for peace and stability in the region. The White House statement reiterated this stance, noting that Biden and Modi “affirmed their continued support for a peaceful resolution of the conflict in accordance with international law, on the basis of the UN Charter.”
During their conversation, the situation in Bangladesh was also a topic of concern. Prime Minister Modi noted in his post that the leaders discussed the need for an early restoration of normalcy in Bangladesh, with particular emphasis on ensuring the safety and security of minority communities, especially Hindus. This reflects a broader regional focus in their dialogue, addressing not only the immediate conflict in Ukraine but also other areas of unrest in South Asia.
The White House statement added another dimension to the conversation, with President Biden commending Prime Minister Modi for his recent historic visits to Poland and Ukraine. These visits marked the first time in decades that an Indian Prime Minister had traveled to these nations, signaling India’s active role in global diplomatic efforts. Biden praised Modi’s message of peace and India’s ongoing humanitarian support for Ukraine, particularly in the energy sector, which has been significantly impacted by the war.
Furthermore, the leaders emphasized their ongoing commitment to collaborating on peace and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region. This includes working through regional partnerships such as the Quad, an alliance comprising the United States, India, Japan, and Australia, which focuses on maintaining stability and security in the Indo-Pacific.
While the White House statement mentioned that Biden and Modi discussed the upcoming annual meetings of the UN General Assembly, it did not confirm whether the two leaders would meet on the sidelines of the event. However, it is anticipated that Prime Minister Modi will attend the meeting and address the UN General Assembly.
The conversation between President Biden and Prime Minister Modi highlighted the leaders’ shared commitment to resolving the Russia-Ukraine conflict peacefully, respecting international law, and upholding the UN Charter. Their dialogue also extended to other regional issues, including the situation in Bangladesh and their joint efforts to promote peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific. As global leaders, Biden and Modi continue to engage in meaningful discussions that address both immediate and long-term challenges on the international stage.
EU to Introduce Standardized Air Travel Rules for Hand Luggage and Liquids
The European Union (EU) is set to introduce new regulations designed to simplify air travel and reduce its unpredictability. Beginning September 1, a series of changes will be implemented regarding hand luggage and the transport of liquids on planes, as part of an initiative to standardize carry-on bag dimensions and liquid limits.
Currently, airlines have the autonomy to define their own rules regarding the size and weight of hand luggage, resulting in a confusing mix of requirements for travelers. This lack of uniformity has often led to unexpected complications, even for frequent flyers. The new EU regulations aim to eliminate these discrepancies by introducing consistent guidelines for all European airlines. As a result, passengers will now encounter standardized baggage sizes and weights across the board.
The new rules will standardize the maximum size of carry-on bags, establishing a uniform guideline that all airlines operating within the EU must follow. This move is expected to benefit travelers by providing a consistent and predictable experience when it comes to packing and transporting hand luggage.
Alongside these changes to carry-on luggage rules, the EU will also revert to a standardized policy for carrying liquids on flights. In recent years, some airports have allowed travelers to carry liquids in containers larger than 100 milliliters, provided that they pass through terminals equipped with Explosive Detection Systems for Cabin Baggage (EDSCB). This exception to the general rule has created disparities in what travelers are permitted to bring aboard flights, depending on the specific security capabilities of individual airports.
However, starting from September 1, this exception will be discontinued until all European airports are equipped with the same advanced screening technologies. This decision means that the familiar 100ml limit on liquids will once again apply uniformly to all passengers flying within or from the EU.
“The EU has stated that this uniform approach is required for the time being, but future modifications could be on the cards as airport security technologies advance,” according to the EU announcement. The reinstatement of the 100ml rule is a temporary measure, but it indicates the EU’s intention to ensure security consistency until such a time when more sophisticated screening technology is universally available.
The EU’s decision to revert to a standardized set of rules for liquids is intended to eliminate confusion and provide clarity for travelers. Under the reinstated rules, all liquids, including gels and aerosols, will need to be placed in containers of no more than 100 milliliters and stored in a single, clear, resealable plastic bag. Each passenger is allowed one such bag, which must be presented separately during security checks.
These new rules are part of a broader effort by the EU to enhance the passenger experience by simplifying airport security processes and ensuring uniform standards across all member states. The changes are expected to improve overall efficiency and reduce delays caused by varying interpretations of luggage and liquid restrictions by different airlines.
For frequent travelers who have become accustomed to different rules at various airports, the new regulations will require some adjustment. However, the EU believes that standardizing these rules will ultimately benefit passengers by reducing confusion and making air travel more predictable.
The EU’s initiative to harmonize hand luggage and liquid rules across Europe reflects a commitment to improving the travel experience while maintaining high security standards. With the implementation of these new regulations, passengers can expect fewer surprises at the airport and a more straightforward process from check-in to boarding.
In conclusion, the EU’s new rules on hand luggage and liquids, which will take effect from September 1, represent a significant step towards simplifying air travel within Europe. By standardizing baggage dimensions and reinstating the 100ml liquid rule, the EU aims to create a more consistent and predictable travel environment for all passengers. This change is anticipated to make journeys less complicated and more straightforward, enhancing the overall passenger experience.
“These fresh alterations should ideally make journeys less complicated and more straightforward for travellers,” the EU noted. The ultimate goal of these changes is to reduce the uncertainty and frustration often associated with varying airline and airport policies, thereby making air travel a smoother experience for all.
Modi to Address UN General Assembly, Highlighting India’s Role in Global Affairs
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to return to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) for a significant address on September 26. This marks his first appearance at the high-level session since 2021, underscoring India’s active involvement on the international stage. The 79th session of the UNGA, which will bring together global leaders in New York, comes at a crucial time as the world faces multiple challenges, from geopolitical tensions to global health emergencies.
Modi’s speech is eagerly awaited as it will reflect India’s foreign policy priorities and its contributions to addressing global issues. The UNGA session is expected to cover several key themes, including international security, climate action, and sustainable development, all while emphasizing the importance of strengthening multilateralism. This year’s assembly will also focus on the adoption of the Pact for the Future, a framework aimed at enhancing global governance. Key components of this pact include the Global Digital Compact and a Declaration on Future Generations, both of which are intended to promote cooperation on technological advancements and protect the interests of future generations.
As the leader of the world’s largest democracy, Prime Minister Modi’s participation in the UNGA is pivotal in shaping global initiatives towards peace, stability, and prosperity. His address is expected to outline India’s strategies and commitments to fostering international cooperation and addressing the pressing needs of developing nations. This engagement highlights India’s proactive role in global diplomacy and its readiness to contribute to a more stable and equitable international order.
India’s voice at the UNGA carries significant weight, particularly in discussions about global governance and international cooperation. “India’s participation in the UNGA is crucial in shaping the global agenda,” noted a senior diplomat. Modi’s speech is likely to emphasize India’s support for multilateralism and its call for reforms in international institutions, such as the United Nations, to make them more inclusive and representative of the current global realities.
During his address, Modi is expected to focus on key issues such as international security, with an emphasis on combating terrorism and promoting peace. He will likely reiterate India’s commitment to playing a constructive role in maintaining global peace and stability. Given the increasing geopolitical tensions, Modi’s stance on these matters will be closely watched by the international community.
Another significant theme of Modi’s speech is expected to be climate action. As a country that is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, India has been at the forefront of advocating for stronger global commitments to combat climate change. “India has always advocated for climate justice and equitable solutions that consider the needs of developing countries,” Modi has previously stated. His address at the UNGA is expected to reinforce India’s commitment to sustainable development and highlight its efforts to transition to a greener economy.
The UNGA session will also focus on the Pact for the Future, which aims to improve global governance frameworks. A key element of this pact is the Global Digital Compact, which seeks to establish principles for digital cooperation and governance. This initiative is particularly relevant as the world becomes increasingly digitalized, and issues such as data privacy, cybersecurity, and digital inequality become more pressing. Modi’s address is expected to support this initiative and highlight India’s digital advancements and contributions to global digital governance.
Furthermore, the Declaration on Future Generations, another component of the Pact for the Future, aims to ensure that the rights and needs of future generations are considered in today’s decision-making processes. India is expected to advocate for stronger international cooperation to safeguard the planet for future generations, reflecting its long-standing emphasis on sustainable development and intergenerational equity.
Modi’s return to the UNGA also symbolizes India’s growing influence and assertiveness on the global stage. Over the past few years, India has been actively participating in various international forums and has been vocal about its stance on key global issues. “India’s proactive engagement in global diplomacy showcases its readiness to contribute to a more stable and equitable international order,” said an analyst. Modi’s speech will likely highlight India’s achievements and aspirations, emphasizing its role as a leading voice for developing countries and a champion of global peace and prosperity.
In addition to outlining India’s foreign policy priorities, Modi’s address at the UNGA will likely include a call for greater international solidarity and cooperation in addressing global challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, has underscored the importance of global cooperation in health and economic recovery. Modi is expected to urge the international community to work together to build a more resilient and inclusive global health system.
Modi’s participation in the UNGA comes at a time when India is increasingly seen as a key player in global affairs. With its rapidly growing economy, large population, and strategic location, India’s role in shaping the global agenda is more important than ever. The country’s leadership in various international initiatives, such as the International Solar Alliance and the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure, has further cemented its position as a global leader in promoting sustainable development and resilience.
As Modi prepares to address the UNGA, there is a sense of anticipation and expectation about the messages he will convey and the positions he will take. His speech will be an opportunity for India to reaffirm its commitment to multilateralism, sustainable development, and global cooperation. It will also be a chance to showcase India’s achievements and highlight its contributions to global peace, stability, and prosperity.
Indian Diaspora Lauded for Strengthening U.S.-India Relations
U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Verma praised the Indian diaspora in the United States for their critical role in strengthening the U.S.-India relationship, emphasizing their courage and determination. During an event organized by the Centre for Social and Economic Progress (CSEP) in New Delhi on August 21, Verma shared personal reflections on the contributions of Indian immigrants, drawing on his own family history to illustrate the broader significance of these ties.
Verma began his remarks by recalling his late father, Kamal Verma’s, journey from a small village in Punjab to New York City in 1963. He described his father’s story as emblematic of the courage and determination that have defined the Indian diaspora’s experience in the U.S. “This is what the U.S. and India relationship is built upon – the courage and determination of millions who have set out to build stronger ties through their work and enormous contributions,” Verma said.
Verma highlighted the substantial presence of the Indian community in the United States, noting that there are over 4 million Americans of Indian descent. Indian immigrants now constitute the second-largest immigrant group in the country. Verma also pointed out the deepening of these people-to-people ties, as evidenced by the record 1.3 million U.S. visas issued to Indians last year.
He referred to the observations made by U.S. Ambassador to India, Eric Garcetti, who framed the progress in U.S.-India relations around the “four P’s”: peace, prosperity, planet, and people. Verma expanded on this framework, discussing how these principles guide the partnership between the two countries.
On the subject of peace and security, Verma emphasized that the U.S. and India have evolved into trusted and integrated security partners. He noted that the bilateral relationship has advanced significantly, moving beyond simple arms sales to include co-production and the development of some of the world’s most advanced defense systems. This evolution reflects a deep level of trust and confidence between the two nations.
Verma highlighted India’s unique status as the only country in the world designated as a “Major Defense Partner” by the United States. He explained that this special designation has been crucial in elevating the sophistication of defense trade and joint military exercises between the two countries. “This status is not just symbolic; it reflects our shared commitment to advancing defense cooperation and ensuring regional stability,” he said.
He also spoke about the shared vision of the United States and India for the Indo-Pacific region, which has been a cornerstone of their partnership. This vision has reinforced a post-World War II international order based on democratic values, the rule of law, and the peaceful resolution of disputes. Verma pointed out that this alignment has been particularly evident in the Quad, a strategic security dialogue between the United States, India, Japan, and Australia.
“When like-minded nations come together as they have in the Quad to deliver greater peace and prosperity, maritime security, to battle climate change, and so much more, our citizens are empowered, and they are more secure,” Verma stated. He underscored the importance of these partnerships in addressing global challenges and promoting regional stability.
Verma also highlighted the exemplary coordination between India and the United States across various fields, including health, innovation, space, economic prosperity, and climate change. He noted that the two nations have achieved significant progress in these areas, often leading collaborative efforts to address global challenges. “On any objective scale, we have done well, very well,” he remarked. However, he cautioned against complacency, urging continued vigilance and effort to build on these successes. “We cannot rest on these successes; we can’t assume they will continue; and we also have to now focus again on what President Biden and Prime Minister Modi said about delivering for the world,” Verma added.
Reflecting on the future, Verma emphasized the importance of continuing to build on the strong foundation of the U.S.-India relationship. He expressed confidence in the partnership’s potential to contribute positively to global peace, security, and prosperity. “The U.S.-India relationship is more than just a bilateral partnership; it is a force for good in the world,” he concluded.
Throughout his speech, Verma reiterated the significance of the Indian diaspora in shaping the U.S.-India relationship. He acknowledged their contributions not only to the American economy and society but also to fostering deeper cultural and diplomatic ties between the two countries. He called on both nations to recognize and celebrate these contributions while continuing to work together towards common goals.
In closing, Verma reiterated his commitment to advancing the U.S.-India partnership, highlighting the need for continued collaboration and mutual respect. He expressed optimism about the future, noting that the relationship between the two countries is stronger than ever, thanks in large part to the efforts and contributions of the Indian diaspora. “The ties that bind our countries are strong, and they will only get stronger as we continue to work together for the betterment of our people and the world,” Verma said.
The event underscored the importance of the U.S.-India partnership in addressing global challenges and promoting a stable, prosperous, and secure world. It highlighted the role of the Indian diaspora as a bridge between the two countries, fostering understanding, cooperation, and shared progress. Verma’s remarks served as a reminder of the enduring strength of the U.S.-India relationship and the many opportunities that lie ahead for both nations.