Category: Global

Waning Investor Optimism Dampens India’s Market Rally Amid Global Shifts

Staff ReporterEconomy, Global 0

India’s stock market, which had emerged as a safe harbor when U.S. President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff hikes rattled global markets in April, is now witnessing a cooling of investor enthusiasm. The country’s relatively insulated $5.4 trillion equity market initially benefited from trade uncertainties elsewhere. However, with trade tensions easing and other Asian markets gaining traction, the motivation to hold India’s highly valued shares is diminishing.

Concerns about slowing earnings growth are taking the sheen off India’s market rally, especially as Chinese stocks listed in Hong Kong gain momentum and attract global capital. These developments come at a time when India’s markets offer limited exposure to the rapidly advancing artificial intelligence sector, making them less appealing to investors seeking growth in tech-related areas.

Together, these factors suggest Indian equities may be poised for a prolonged period of underperformance compared to their Asian counterparts. This comes after a robust four-year bull run that saw Indian shares reach record highs.

“This is not the year for India,” remarked Amol Gogate, an emerging markets fund manager at Carmignac in London. “Overall, 2025 is going to be tough as India doesn’t have a lot going for it compared with other markets such as China,” he added.

India had initially shown strong resilience to global disruptions triggered by Trump’s tariffs and was the first major economy to fully recover from the losses those policies inflicted. But in the rebound that followed the market dip in April, the MSCI India Index has lagged behind the broader Asian rally.

As the first half of 2025 comes to a close, India’s MSCI index has risen by 6.3 percent. That gain, however, falls short of the MSCI Asia Pacific Index, which has outpaced it by nearly six percentage points. Meanwhile, Chinese shares traded in Hong Kong have surged by 20 percent this year. Their ascent is largely attributed to progress in artificial intelligence and an influx of exciting new listings.

One of the major sticking points for investors looking at India is its steep valuations. The MSCI India Index currently trades at close to 23 times projected earnings, which makes it among the costliest stock markets globally. This figure is well above the five-year average of 21.5. Compounding the concern is India’s relatively modest earnings growth outlook, especially when compared to regional competitors like South Korea and Taiwan, according to Bloomberg data.

“We don’t have an overweight allocation to India and that’s mainly because of valuations,” said Jian Shi Cortesi, a fund manager at GAM Investment Management in Zurich. “We like the country for its longer-term potential but right now valuation is even more stretched than in the past,” she noted.

Despite the headwinds, some investors who focus on medium- to long-term horizons still find compelling reasons to stay optimistic about India’s prospects. The country remains the fastest-growing major economy and benefits from a robust domestic market, both of which continue to make its equity space attractive for certain players.

“We still believe in the long-term growth potential of India and usually take dips as buying opportunities for Indian stocks,” said Joohee An, chief investment officer at Mirae Asset Global Investments in Hong Kong.

Yet, recent foreign capital flows suggest that confidence is wavering. The sharp rally that took Indian markets to new highs in late September has raised alarms about stretched valuations. In response, global investors have reduced their stakes by almost $9 billion in 2025 alone. According to data compiled by Bloomberg, India is now on track to record its first consecutive year of foreign outflows since 1999.

Investor sentiment appears subdued across other financial instruments as well. The Indian rupee, for instance, has seen a minor decline against the U.S. dollar this quarter. This places it among only two Asian currencies to have weakened during the same period. In the bond market, foreign investors have pulled back significantly, reducing their holdings in Indian index-eligible debt securities by $3.4 billion since April.

“Earnings are performing in line with expectations but you need faster growth and positive profit revisions to justify continued expansion of valuation multiples,” said Alan Richardson, a senior portfolio manager at Samsung Asset Management Co. He added, “I am surprised the market even managed to recover so fast from the April lows on narratives with little change in fundamental growth.”

In essence, while India’s long-term economic narrative remains appealing, the immediate outlook has become less convincing for global investors. High valuations, tempered earnings expectations, and a lack of exposure to emerging themes like AI are diminishing its appeal relative to faster-growing or more attractively priced markets in Asia. The landscape for Indian equities in the second half of 2025 could well hinge on whether the economy can surprise investors with stronger growth or compelling sectoral developments.

Elon Musk Sounds Alarm on Falling Birth Rates, Warns of Civilizational Collapse

Staff ReporterGlobal, Opinion 0

Tech billionaire Elon Musk has once again voiced his growing concern over what he believes is humanity’s most significant existential threat: declining birth rates. Reacting to a recent social media post that cited a Fortune report on demographic trends, the Tesla and SpaceX founder stressed the alarming consequences of modern fertility patterns and emphasized the need for higher birth rates to avoid long-term societal collapse.

The discussion was triggered by a post shared on X (formerly Twitter) by user Mario Nawfal, who drew attention to findings suggesting that the often-cited replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman is no longer sufficient to maintain stable population levels. Nawfal wrote, “Scientists now say 2.1 kids per woman won’t cut it — 2.7 is the real number needed to avoid long-term extinction. Right now, the U.S. is at 1.66, and most rich countries are even lower, including Italy at 1.29 and Japan at 1.30.”

Nawfal explained that the revised figure of 2.7 children per woman takes into account various social and biological factors such as the growing number of people who remain childless and gender disparities at birth. In support of the post, Elon Musk reiterated the significance of addressing the trend by reposting Nawfal’s data and adding his own comment: “People who have kids do need to have 3 kids to make up for those who have 0 or 1 kid or population will collapse.”

Musk has long linked demographic decline to the downfall of great civilizations, most notably the Roman Empire. “Low birth rates were the primary factor in their downfall — shockingly overlooked by most historians,” Musk previously said, pointing out how historical societies failed to recognize the risks of unsustainable fertility levels. He considers the matter not just a demographic or statistical challenge, but a civilizational one, warning of long-term ramifications. As he put it, “If you don’t believe me now, just wait 20 years.”

His advocacy is not without personal commitment. Over the last 20 years, Musk has become a father to 14 children. His journey into parenthood began in 2002 with the birth of Nevada Alexander, his first child with then-wife Justine Wilson, a Canadian author. Tragically, Nevada died of sudden infant death syndrome at only ten weeks old. Musk and Wilson went on to have five more children: twins Vivian and Griffin, followed by triplets Kai, Saxon, and Damian. Since then, Musk has had additional children, making him one of the most high-profile figures to practice what he preaches in terms of contributing to population growth.

Concerns about declining fertility rates are not limited to Musk and independent commentators. International agencies are now addressing the issue with growing urgency. A new report from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), titled “The Real Fertility Crisis,” highlights the widespread nature of low fertility levels and the growing number of people unable to meet their desired family size.

“If you don’t believe me now, just wait 20 years,” Musk emphasized again in light of the UN’s findings.

The 2025 State of World Population (SOWP) Report by the UNFPA is particularly significant because it marks one of the agency’s most explicit acknowledgments to date of the challenges associated with global fertility decline. The report found that hundreds of millions of people globally are not having as many children as they would prefer. Two of the most commonly cited reasons are the escalating financial burden of childrearing and increasing difficulty in finding compatible partners.

India, the world’s most populous country, is also seeing fertility rates dip below the replacement threshold. According to the report, India’s total fertility rate has now decreased to 1.9 births per woman. This is a major shift from earlier decades when families in India were much larger. Andrea M Wojnar, UNFPA’s India Representative, credited the decline to improvements in education and better access to reproductive health services. “India has made significant progress in lowering fertility rates – from nearly five children per woman in 1970 to about two today, thanks to improved education and access to reproductive healthcare,” Wojnar said.

Musk’s alarmism may strike some as exaggerated, but his consistent messaging is gaining traction as more global data points to a steady decline in birth rates, particularly in developed and rapidly developing countries. He sees the risk as both mathematical and civilizational — a slow but potentially irreversible shift in the structure of human society. While some experts caution against overreaction, others acknowledge that fertility decline could lead to a host of economic and societal issues, such as aging populations, labor shortages, and reduced economic growth.

The UNFPA report seeks to clarify that the problem is not necessarily overpopulation, as previously believed, but rather the growing mismatch between fertility aspirations and reality. Economic pressures, career priorities, social isolation, and changing gender roles are all contributing to people choosing to have fewer or no children.

Elon Musk’s views place him among a small but vocal group of public figures calling for a reevaluation of societal attitudes toward parenthood and family size. His insistence that “people who have kids do need to have 3 kids” stems from the idea that demographic stability cannot be achieved if most people have only one or two children, especially when others have none. It’s a simple numbers game, he argues — one that humanity is currently losing.

By referencing ancient Rome and other past civilizations, Musk is also making a cultural and historical argument. He believes that like Rome, modern societies risk falling into decline if they fail to maintain robust population growth. His call to action isn’t just aimed at policymakers or economists but at everyday citizens who can help reverse the trend through family-building.

While some critics question whether increasing birth rates is the correct or most ethical solution — especially considering environmental concerns and resource distribution — the concern about aging populations and shrinking workforces is already playing out in countries like Japan, South Korea, and Italy. These nations are grappling with pension crises, labor gaps, and diminished innovation capacity due to shrinking youth populations.

Musk’s message, therefore, is as much a warning as it is a challenge. With his blend of data, historical context, and personal commitment, he continues to advocate for a fundamental rethink of modern reproductive priorities. As he warned once again, “If you don’t believe me now, just wait 20 years.”

Global Hindu Renaissance Honored in Oslo: Rajarshi Modi Awards Four Dharmic Leaders the Title of “Hindu King”

Staff ReporterGlobal, Religion 0

In a moment marked by spiritual symbolism and global aspiration, Rajarshi Bhupendra Modi—entrepreneur, philanthropist, and champion of Sanatana Dharma—hosted an event in Oslo that honored four prominent individuals who embody the values of dharmic leadership, cultural revival, and world peace. The ceremony took place on June 20, 2025, at the Nobel Peace Center, a venue historically associated with promoting international harmony, where Modi conferred the honorary title of “Hindu King” upon each of the awardees.

Rajarshi Modi, who is the founder of the Adi Shankara Math in Rampur, India, presented this symbolic honor to four individuals renowned for their dedication to spirituality, service, and global cultural harmony. The recipients were:

Dr. Sudhir Parikh, a U.S.-based physician and recipient of India’s Padma Shri, known for his philanthropic efforts and as the founder of Parikh Worldwide Media, which serves as a major voice of the global Indian diaspora.

Dr. Deepak Chopra, a world-renowned author and spiritual figure, who has played a pivotal role in bringing Vedanta and Ayurveda into mainstream global wellness and philosophical discourse.

Dr. Romesh Japra, a notable community leader in the United States, recognized for building interfaith bridges and promoting pluralism.

Princess Aswathi Thirunal Gouri Lakshmi Bayi, a member of the Travancore royal family and a respected author who has played a crucial role in preserving the traditions of Indian temples and the legacy of her royal heritage.

Organizers of the event emphasized that this ceremony was not merely a recognition of individual achievement but a “symbolic moment” representing the global relevance and resurgence of Sanatana Dharma. The honored leaders are being presented as “spiritual trustees of global harmony, dharma, and peace.”

“This is a call for dharmic action,” Rajarshi Modi declared in a press release issued by the organizing body. “A moment for global Hindu leaders to step forward—not to rule, but to serve. Not to divide, but to unite. The age of spiritual statecraft has returned—and with it, a vision of peace that the world deeply needs.”

Rajarshi Modi has for years led efforts to revive Hindu culture and spiritual leadership through a global lens. His movement seeks to reintroduce Hindu Dharma’s universal principles to the world stage and to inspire new forms of leadership rooted in ancient wisdom.

His recognition as a “Rajarshi” occurred on January 2, 2024, during his 75th birthday celebration, when all four Shankaracharyas—India’s most revered spiritual authorities—jointly conferred the title upon him. This rare recognition was later reaffirmed at the Maha Kumbh in 2025, further solidifying his role as a key figure in the spiritual reawakening of Hinduism.

At the Maha Kumbh, Rajarshi Modi was also presented with the Dharma Dand, a sacred staff that symbolizes spiritual responsibility and his role in uniting Hindus around the world. This significant honor marked a new phase in his journey as a spiritual statesman.

To commemorate this moment, Rajarshi Modi attended the Maha Kumbh in his new role, establishing what came to be known as the Rajarshi Palace—a unique hospitality hub offering spiritual and cultural immersion to global visitors. The palace welcomed 7,200 guests from various parts of the world, with all accommodations provided free of cost.

Described as a “first-of-its-kind spiritual hospitality hub,” the Rajarshi Palace exemplified the traditional Hindu ethos of “Atithi Devo Bhava,” or “the guest is God.” It embodied Hindu values of openness, generosity, and magnificence. A spokesperson for the initiative stated, “The palace was not just a structure. It was a spiritual statement—showcasing Hinduism not as rigid or regional, but as global, inclusive, and elevated.”

Following the Kumbh, Rajarshi Modi founded the Jagadguru Adi Sankara Math in Rampur. This spiritual and educational institution was created with the vision of uniting Hindus globally and disseminating the teachings of Advaita Vedanta. Advaita Vedanta is a non-dualistic school of Hindu philosophy emphasizing the oneness of existence, inner peace, and self-realization.

Building on these foundational efforts, Rajarshi Modi initiated a worldwide campaign known as the Global Hindu Kings Movement. This project seeks to identify and honor 500 exceptional individuals—both men and women above the age of 75—who have significantly contributed to dharma, peace, and cultural leadership in various fields such as business, spirituality, media, medicine, and philanthropy.

“These individuals are being recognized as the flagbearers of Hindu values in the contemporary world,” said the organizers of the movement. Unlike historical rulers, these honorees are envisioned as modern-day spiritual leaders who influence society through wisdom and ethical governance rather than political power.

“New Age Hindu Kings and Queens are not rulers of land but stewards of consciousness,” said Rajarshi Modi. “They lead global businesses, generate wealth with purpose, and promote peace through dharmic leadership. They are guardians of tradition, carriers of wisdom, and ambassadors of harmony—entrusted with carrying Adi Sankara’s legacy into the 21st century.”

This initiative, according to Dr. Modi, reaffirms a uniquely Hindu worldview—one that is both timeless and profoundly universal. It upholds three central philosophical tenets:

First, the belief in rebirth is core to Hinduism. It presents life as a journey of the soul through multiple existences, each one offering opportunities for spiritual evolution and learning.

Second, the Sun is revered as the only visible form of God. It represents life-giving energy, the illuminating force of knowledge, and the unifying symbol of universal consciousness.

Third, Hindus are described as global citizens. Their identity is not confined by geographical boundaries but shaped by an expansive spiritual consciousness. As Rajarshi Modi puts it, they are “rooted in dharma, yet open to the world.”

In organizing this event in Oslo and launching the broader movement, Rajarshi Bhupendra Modi is not merely honoring individuals; he is initiating a larger global vision that connects ancient wisdom to modern challenges. Through symbolic acts, spiritual recognition, and international outreach, he is working to establish a dharmic model of leadership in an era increasingly defined by fragmentation and conflict.

As this movement gains momentum, its leaders hope to spark a global awakening—one in which Sanatana Dharma’s eternal values of peace, unity, and self-realization can illuminate new paths toward coexistence and collective well-being.

China Edges Closer to B-2 Rival as U.S. Deploys Stealth Bomber Against Iran

Staff ReporterGlobal, USA 0

In a stunning demonstration of military capability, the United States recently used its stealth B-2 Spirit bomber to target Iran’s most fortified nuclear facility—marking an unprecedented application of air power. While this headline-grabbing move captured global attention, another significant development has been unfolding quietly in the shadows: China appears to be progressing with its own stealth bomber program. Satellite images dated May 14, 2025, obtained by The War Zone, captured a strikingly large, stealthy aircraft with a flying wing design at a covert test site near Malan in China’s Xinjiang region.

The mysterious aircraft, which resembles a drone, is believed to be a high-altitude, long-endurance (HALE) platform. Analysts say its appearance outside newly constructed hangars suggests it could be part of a broader technological ecosystem involving China’s next-generation stealth projects such as the H-20 bomber and the J-36 fighter jet. Experts have estimated the aircraft’s wingspan to be roughly 52 meters—or about 170 feet—placing it in the same size category as the U.S. B-2 Spirit.

Though the sighting points to an impressive feat in aviation, questions persist about whether China’s technological leap was entirely indigenous. A shadow from the past resurfaces in this context, involving a man who was once an integral part of America’s stealth program. In 2005, former Northrop engineer Noshir Gowadia was arrested for leaking top-secret U.S. defense information to China and other foreign nations. His betrayal may have sown the seeds for the capabilities now visible in China’s burgeoning stealth aircraft arsenal.

Gowadia, born in Bombay (now Mumbai), joined Northrop in the 1960s. During his time with the company, he played a critical role in the development of the B-2’s revolutionary low-observable propulsion and stealth technology. After leaving Northrop in 1986, Gowadia went on to launch his own consulting firm. However, by 2004, federal investigators were scrutinizing his activities after classified infrared suppression documents were discovered in a furniture shipment addressed to him. The FBI’s findings indicated something far more alarming than a paperwork mishap.

According to Popular Mechanics, Gowadia had made several trips to China between 2003 and 2004, during which he allegedly handed over sensitive details about stealth technology. In return, he received approximately $110,000 over a span of three years. The FBI acted decisively in October 2005, raiding his home in Maui, Hawaii, and seizing 500 pounds of material that included paper documents and electronic storage devices.

“Gowadia had spent two decades at the aerospace and defense contractor Northrop (now Northrop Grumman) where he was instrumental in designing the stealth propulsion system for the B-2 Spirit bomber, one of the most revolutionary military technologies in generations,” the report stated. “He once had top security clearance and taught university classes in advanced aeronautical principles.”

Initially, Gowadia denied any wrongdoing, but eventually he submitted a written confession. “On reflection, what I did was wrong to help the PRC make a cruise missile. What I did was espionage and treason,” he admitted. His acknowledgment of guilt left little ambiguity about the gravity of his actions. In 2010, he was convicted on 14 counts under both the Arms Export Control Act and the Espionage Act. The following year, he was sentenced to 32 years in prison. Today, he remains incarcerated at the supermax federal penitentiary in Florence, Colorado.

Despite the conviction, the case continues to generate controversy. Gowadia’s son, Ashton Gowadia, has steadfastly maintained his father’s innocence. He alleges that vital pieces of evidence were withheld during the trial and that the FBI shaped the entire narrative to ensure a conviction. While these claims persist, the consensus among security experts is that the damage was already irreversible.

The intelligence compromised by Gowadia seems to have accelerated China’s access to advanced stealth capabilities. Observers now see a direct link between his betrayal and the technological maturity reflected in China’s recent aviation developments. The newly spotted aircraft near Malan bears key design similarities to the B-2 Spirit, particularly in its flying wing structure and its apparent ability to reduce radar cross-section, both hallmarks of American stealth design.

Though full operational details about the Chinese craft remain classified or speculative, its dimensions and structure hint at more than just a surveillance role. The aircraft could potentially be a manned bomber, a large autonomous drone, or a flexible platform capable of carrying advanced payloads for both reconnaissance and strike missions. With projects like the H-20 long-range stealth bomber reportedly in development for over a decade, the emergence of this HALE-like aircraft reinforces speculation that China is close to unveiling its own version of the B-2.

The geopolitical implications of this development are profound. As the U.S. continues to maintain a technological edge with proven platforms like the B-2, the emergence of a near-peer Chinese equivalent represents a shift in the balance of strategic air power. The B-2 remains the only operational stealth bomber in the world with long-range strike capabilities and the ability to penetrate the most heavily defended airspaces. However, if China succeeds in fielding a similar craft, it could significantly alter the equation of deterrence and response in any future conflict scenario.

China has remained tight-lipped about the aircraft spotted near Malan. No official statements have been released, nor have any details been published in state-controlled media. Nonetheless, defense analysts agree that this sighting adds weight to growing concerns about China’s rapid advancements in military aerospace technology. These developments are especially notable given the country’s past reliance on reverse-engineering foreign systems. With help from figures like Gowadia, China’s journey to achieving true stealth capabilities may have gained crucial momentum.

In retrospect, the full scope of Gowadia’s betrayal goes beyond the man himself. It exposed vulnerabilities in America’s defense industrial security and provided adversarial powers with a shortcut to catching up. The fallout from his actions is now playing out in satellite images, in foreign hangars, and perhaps soon in global airspace.

As China edges closer to deploying a stealth bomber that could stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the B-2, the world is witnessing a new era of aerial warfare defined not just by innovation, but also by the lingering consequences of espionage.

Rajarshi Bhupendra Modi Honours Global Leaders in Oslo as ‘Hindu Kings’ to Champion Peace and Dharmic Values

Staff ReporterGlobal, Religion 0

Rajarshi Bhupendra Modi, known for his work as an entrepreneur, spiritual reformer, and peacemaker, spearheaded a landmark event in Oslo to advance the principles of Sanatana Dharma, cultural unity, and global peace. As the founder of the Adi Shankara Math in Rampur, India, Rajarshi Modi convened this international gathering to formally recognize individuals who have significantly contributed to those ideals.

On June 20, 2025, a prestigious event unfolded at the Nobel Peace Center in Oslo, where Rajarshi Modi bestowed the honorary title of “Hindu King” upon four influential figures. Each recipient was celebrated for their work in promoting spirituality, interfaith understanding, wellness, and cultural preservation. This ceremony marked a key milestone in Modi’s mission to reposition Sanatan Dharma as a guiding force for global peace and unity.

The honorees included four individuals whose lives and legacies represent the spirit of dharmic leadership. Dr. Sudhir Parikh, a U.S.-based physician and Padma Shri awardee, was among them. He is also the founder of Parikh Worldwide Media, which serves as a strong platform for the Indian diaspora around the globe. Dr. Deepak Chopra, renowned globally as an author and spiritual teacher, was another awardee. He is widely credited for introducing Vedanta and Ayurveda into global wellness narratives, bridging Eastern spiritual traditions with Western medical science.

Dr. Romesh Japra, a prominent interfaith leader in the United States and a voice of unity across diverse communities, was honored for his efforts in creating dialogue across faiths. Also recognized was Princess Aswathi Thirunal Gouri Lakshmi Bayi of the Travancore royal family, a respected author known for her work in safeguarding India’s temple culture and royal heritage.

Organizers of the event described the ceremony as a “symbolic moment” underscoring the global importance of Sanatan Dharma. The recognition of these individuals, they explained, establishes them as “spiritual trustees of global harmony, dharma, and peace.”

Rajarshi Modi emphasized the spiritual vision behind the initiative, stating, “This is a call for dharmic action. A moment for global Hindu leaders to step forward—not to rule, but to serve. Not to divide, but to unite. The age of spiritual statecraft has returned—and with it, a vision of peace that the world deeply needs.”

Rajarshi Modi, who has long advocated for the resurgence of Hindu culture and values on a global scale, received personal validation for his spiritual work from India’s most respected religious leaders. On January 2, 2024, during his 75th birthday celebrations, he was honored with the title “Rajarshi” by the four Shankaracharyas—spiritual heads representing the highest echelon of Hindu authority.

That recognition was further strengthened a year later at the Maha Kumbh 2025, a massive religious gathering in India. At the event, Modi was presented with the Dharma Dand, a sacred staff symbolizing his commitment to spiritual leadership and his duty to unify Hindus across borders. The presentation of the Dharma Dand highlighted Modi’s emergence not just as a leader in thought, but also as a practical force in global Hindu unity.

During the Kumbh Mela, Rajarshi Modi took on a unique role by inaugurating the Rajarshi Palace, his first official appearance at the event since being honored with the Rajarshi title. The palace was not just a physical structure but an embodiment of Hindu hospitality and inclusivity. It was described as “a first-of-its-kind spiritual hospitality hub,” hosting 7,200 guests from around the world at no cost to them.

A spokesperson explained the deeper significance of the initiative: “The palace was not just a structure. It was a spiritual statement—showcasing Hinduism not as rigid or regional, but as global, inclusive, and elevated.” The theme of “Atithi Devo Bhava”—the guest is equivalent to God—was deeply embedded in the gesture, reflecting the tradition’s openness and generosity.

Following his engagement at the Kumbh, Rajarshi Modi established the Jagadguru Adi Sankara Math in Rampur. The new institution serves both spiritual and educational goals, with a strong emphasis on propagating the teachings of Advaita Vedanta. This school of thought, rooted in the principle of non-duality, offers a framework of oneness, spiritual awakening, and global harmony that Modi believes is key to navigating the challenges of the modern world.

Riding the momentum of these developments, Rajarshi Modi initiated a broader global campaign titled the “Global Hindu Kings Movement.” The initiative aims to identify and celebrate 500 senior individuals—each over the age of 75—who have shown unwavering dedication to dharma, peace, and cultural leadership across various sectors. These figures, drawn from fields such as business, philanthropy, medicine, media, and spiritual life, are being formally recognized as modern bearers of Hindu ideals.

Explaining the deeper philosophy behind the movement, Rajarshi Modi said, “New Age Hindu Kings and Queens are not rulers of land but stewards of consciousness. They lead global businesses, generate wealth with purpose, and promote peace through dharmic leadership. They are guardians of tradition, carriers of wisdom, and ambassadors of harmony—entrusted with carrying Adi Sankara’s legacy into the 21st century.”

Dr. Modi believes that the initiative is not just about honoring individuals but about reviving the essential tenets of the Hindu worldview, which he describes as universal in scope. According to him, three timeless ideas define this worldview. First, “Rebirth is the eternal truth, revealing the soul’s evolutionary journey.” This reflects the Hindu belief in reincarnation and spiritual progress across lifetimes.

Second, he asserts, “The Sun is the only visible God, symbolizing life, light, and universal consciousness.” This emphasis on the sun as a universal source ties into the deeper symbolism of spiritual light and awareness across cultures. Finally, he noted, “Hindus are global citizens, defined not by geography but by consciousness—rooted in dharma, yet open to the world.” This idea encapsulates Modi’s broader mission to see Hinduism as a global force for good, extending beyond national or ethnic boundaries.

Through the Oslo ceremony and the broader initiatives he is driving, Rajarshi Bhupendra Modi has positioned himself not merely as a spiritual leader, but as a catalyst for global transformation. The recognition of four distinguished figures as “Hindu Kings” is just one expression of a wider mission: to elevate dharmic leadership as a unifying and peace-promoting force in a fragmented world.

By linking ancient principles with modern leadership, Modi aims to offer a new spiritual roadmap—one that encourages service over power, unity over division, and consciousness over materialism. As his movement grows, it seeks to redefine what it means to be a global Hindu leader in the 21st century.

Box Office Blockbusters: The Biggest Movie Hits of 2025 So Far

Staff ReporterEntertainment, Global 0

The first half of 2025 has proven to be an exhilarating time for film enthusiasts, with a wide array of movies making their debut and achieving significant success at the global box office. From animated sequels to action-packed thrillers, cinema-goers have had plenty to enjoy. Standout hits such as Ne Zha 2 and Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning, starring Tom Cruise in his final outing as Ethan Hunt, have drawn large crowds and generated considerable earnings.

This surge in box office numbers is reminiscent of last year’s impressive performances. In 2024, a string of sequels and franchise favorites like Deadpool & Wolverine, Inside Out 2, Moana 2, Despicable Me 4, and Kung Fu Panda 4 dominated cinema screens worldwide. The excitement surrounding returning characters and new adventures carried over into 2025, with eager fans flocking to theatres in the first six months of the year to watch their favorite stars return to action or embark on new story arcs.

According to data shared by Dexerto, here are the top 10 highest-grossing films of 2025 so far based on worldwide earnings:

Topping the list is Ne Zha 2, the animated action-adventure film that has taken audiences by storm, collecting a staggering $1.898 billion globally. Released at the end of January, the film’s success has positioned it as the only 2025 release so far to break the $1 billion mark. The phenomenal reception of Ne Zha 2 shows the continued popularity of animated epics and Eastern mythology-inspired storytelling among a broad audience.

In second place is A Minecraft Movie, which has earned $954 million worldwide. The adaptation of the popular video game has successfully translated its pixelated universe onto the big screen, resonating with fans of all ages. Its near-billion-dollar box office performance underlines the strength of gaming franchises in modern cinema.

Following closely is Lilo & Stitch, the live-action remake of the beloved animated classic. With earnings of $910 million, the film has not only met expectations but exceeded them, showcasing the enduring affection audiences have for Disney remakes.

Next is Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning, which has earned $541 million. The film marks the end of an era for Tom Cruise as he reprises the role of Ethan Hunt for the final time. Still running in select theatres, this installment has managed to keep fans on the edge of their seats with its signature blend of high-stakes action and elaborate stunts.

Captain America: Brave New World also finds a spot on the top 10 list, having grossed $415 million globally. As part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the film continues the storyline following Steve Rogers’ departure, now focusing on Sam Wilson taking up the mantle of Captain America.

Another Marvel entry, Thunderbolts, has made $381 million and is still running in select cinemas. This team-up movie introduces a mix of antiheroes and morally complex characters, expanding the MCU’s scope beyond traditional heroism.

Sinners, a darker, original thriller, follows with $364 million in earnings, proving that original content still has a place amidst a landscape crowded with franchises and sequels.

In eighth position is the live-action version of How to Train Your Dragon, which was released on June 13 and is still currently showing in theatres. With $358 million in earnings, it features performances by Mason Thames, Nico Parker, Gabriel Howell, and Julian Dennison. This reimagined tale of dragons and friendships continues to enchant both loyal fans and new viewers.

Rounding out the top 10 are Final Destination: Bloodlines with $280 million and Snow White with $205 million. These films reflect the enduring appeal of horror reboots and fairy tale adaptations, respectively. The latest Final Destination entry reinvigorates the long-running franchise with fresh scares, while Snow White brings a modern retelling of the iconic tale to a new generation.

Many of these films are still available in theatres, particularly Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning, Thunderbolts, Lilo & Stitch, and How to Train Your Dragon. This means their earnings could continue to climb in the weeks ahead, especially with summer holidays driving footfall.

Looking back at 2024, it was a record-setting year with several billion-dollar hits that have helped shape the current cinematic momentum. Inside Out 2 led the pack with $1.69 billion, followed by Deadpool & Wolverine with $1.34 billion. Both sequels benefitted from strong fan bases and positive word of mouth. Moana 2 joined the billion-dollar club with $1 billion in box office revenue, confirming that Disney’s animated adventures remain evergreen.

Despicable Me 4 also performed impressively with $969 million, continuing the Minions’ long-standing success. Meanwhile, Wicked brought in $728 million, giving musical fans a theatrical spectacle. Other major earners from 2024 included Dune: Part Two with $714 million, Mufasa: The Lion King with $699 million, and Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire which made $571 million. Kung Fu Panda 4 and Sonic the Hedgehog 3 rounded out the top 10 with $548 million and $483 million respectively, showing strong performance from animated and hybrid films alike.

Looking ahead, the rest of 2025 is packed with exciting releases that are likely to keep the box office thriving. Some of the most anticipated films set for release this year include F1, M3GAN 2.0, Jurassic World: Rebirth, Heads of State, Superman, Smurfs, Eddington, The Fantastic Four: First Steps, Splitsville, The Roses, The Toxic Avenger, The Conjuring: Last Rites, The Smashing Machine, Kiss of the Spider Woman, Now You See Me: Now You Don’t, and Avatar: Fire and Ash.

Each of these titles promises a unique cinematic experience, with several being part of well-established franchises and others representing bold, original storytelling. With such a diverse lineup on the horizon, box office momentum is expected to continue well into the second half of the year.

In summary, 2025 has kicked off with a strong performance in theatres around the world, offering a mix of sequels, remakes, and original stories that have connected with audiences across demographics. With only one film so far, Ne Zha 2, surpassing the $1 billion mark, it’s worth watching to see if any of the upcoming releases will join that elite club.

When asked about the timing of the highest-grossing film of the year, the answer is simple: “It was released at the end of January.”

And as for the billion-dollar club this year? “As per reports, only Ne Zha 2 ($1.898 billion) has crossed the $1 billion mark so far.”

With half the year still to go, audiences can look forward to more cinematic magic as new releases aim to leave their mark at the box office.

Yoga Day Unites the World: From Ancient Roots to Global Celebrations

Staff ReporterCulture, Global 0

On June 21, as the summer solstice marks the longest day of the year, people across the globe — from seasoned practitioners to casual enthusiasts — will roll out their yoga mats in recognition of the International Day of Yoga. This global celebration, first initiated 11 years ago by the United Nations and the Indian government, underscores the widespread popularity and impact of this ancient Indian tradition.

In a historic move, the United Nations General Assembly witnessed overwhelming support for the Yoga Day resolution, with 175 countries co-sponsoring it. Passed unanimously in December 2014, it signified a rare show of unity among member nations. At the time, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reflected on the moment, saying, “In this century, we realize that yoga has united the world.”

The term “yoga” comes from the Sanskrit word “yuj,” which means “to unite.” Rooted deeply in Indian philosophy, yoga is designed to synchronize the body, mind, and spirit. Through a series of postures known as asanas, coordinated with breathing techniques, yoga aims to bring harmony and peace within. Whether it’s the rigorous style of Ashtanga or the more passive Yin yoga, its various forms have found resonance across continents, cultures, and demographics. Over the years, yoga has emerged as one of India’s most embraced contributions to global culture.

However, in many parts of the West, especially in the United States, yoga has evolved into something uniquely modern. Adaptations like “beer yoga” and the rise of billion-dollar yoga apparel industries reflect this transformation. Such shifts have raised concerns over whether yoga’s spiritual roots are being overshadowed by commercial trends, especially among those who view it as closely tied to Hindu devotional practices.

Nonetheless, proponents argue that yoga — no matter how it is practiced — has become embedded in the cultural fabric of the U.S. This year’s Yoga Day theme, “Yoga for One Earth, One Health,” will be commemorated across America through a series of events. Among them is a sunset yoga session at the United Nations headquarters in New York City, which two years ago set a Guinness World Record for the most nationalities participating in yoga simultaneously.

Tirlok Malik, founder of the Happy Life Yoga organization, emphasized the universal benefits of the practice. “Yoga, (whether) you do it right or do it wrong, do it this way or that way, it is still beneficial,” he said. He described yoga as “one of the greatest gifts India has given to the world.”

For Malik — who is also an Emmy-nominated filmmaker and restaurant owner — yoga represents more than just physical exercise. It’s a lifestyle rooted in Ayurvedic nutrition, positive thinking, and stress-free living. His organization promotes classes that include affirmations, mindful self-talk, and laughter. According to him, mats are optional. “There’s no need for a mat,” said Malik, who is scheduled to present at both the UPLIFTNY yoga event in Central Park on Friday and an online session hosted by the Indian Consulate on Sunday, June 22.

“Yoga is how you breathe, how you think, what are your emotional values and what are your physical stances,” Malik explained. He cautioned against equating fitness with well-being. “I know many people who practice yoga, but they’re not healthy. They’re not happy. Just because you work out in a health club for one hour every day, it doesn’t give you a happy or healthy life: it gives you a muscular body.”

Guruji H.H. Dileepkumar Thankappan, a globally known Hindu spiritual teacher, also underscored yoga’s deeper significance. While he acknowledged that yoga’s popularity in the West is often centered around its fitness benefits, he emphasized that this is only one aspect of a broader spiritual discipline. His vision extends to seeing yoga formally recognized in global sporting arenas. “Why did the universe give us legs and hands? To do something,” he remarked. “By doing yoga, you get less tired and have more energy. A lot of the time, we are not stretching properly, or we are not getting balance or strength.”

Thankappan also dispelled the idea that expensive gear or classes are necessary. “Lots of people have a wooden floor in their apartment, which is the best,” he said. A longtime U.S. resident, he founded the World Yoga Festival in 1993, choosing the summer solstice as its symbolic date. He has spent years collaborating with spiritual leaders and public officials to help the day gain international prominence. On Friday, he plans to lead a yoga session at the Church Center for the United Nations, specifically designed for those seeking a more spiritual connection through their practice.

“Indian philosophy and Indian culture is for every single being around the globe, not only for Indians,” Thankappan said. “We want to showcase around the world we are under one God, under one family.”

In New York, several spiritual communities are participating in the celebrations. The Brahma Kumaris, a meditation-focused women’s ashram, will hold an event titled “Spirit of Yoga” on Saturday at their Global Harmony House in Great Neck. The organization highlighted the distinction between spiritual yoga and commercial wellness culture.

“In today’s commercialized wellness world, yoga is often reduced to fitness,” said Gayatri Naraine, the Brahma Kumaris’ NGO representative at the U.N., in a press release. “But the true spirit of yoga is about connecting to our highest self, to the Supreme, through spiritual awareness.”

Another major celebration is set to take place in Times Square, where yogis will participate in the Mind Over Madness yoga event. This day-long gathering includes free classes at the Broadway pedestrian plazas and online. Tim Tompkins, former president of the Times Square Alliance, described the event as a spiritual retreat within the city. “Thousands of people are making a different kind of pilgrimage to Times Square, and under the bright light of the longest day of the year, they are bringing just a little bit of stillness, and a little bit of santosa (contentment), to this intense and crazy city that we love,” he stated on the event’s website.

Reflecting on the journey of yoga from the East to the West, Malik believes the efforts of Indian spiritual leaders from the 1960s onward have left a lasting legacy. The foundational ideas they brought with them, he said, continue to thrive in various forms across the Western world.

“I think whatever is happening is very good,” Malik noted. “My salute to the American people who have really promoted yoga. Now, the whole world knows about it.”

US Strikes on Iran’s Nuclear Sites Caused Limited Damage, Say Intelligence Assessments

Staff ReporterGlobal, USA 0

Recent United States military strikes on three of Iran’s nuclear facilities did not achieve their goal of fully dismantling the country’s nuclear program, according to a preliminary intelligence evaluation. The report, described by seven individuals familiar with its findings, indicates that while damage was done, the effect of the strikes is estimated to have delayed Iran’s progress by only a few months.

The evaluation was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), which serves as the Pentagon’s intelligence branch. It relied on battle damage assessments carried out by US Central Command following the strikes. According to one source, the analysis remains ongoing and may evolve as more intelligence is gathered. However, the early conclusions contradict assertions made by President Donald Trump and his administration regarding the effectiveness of the attacks.

President Trump has claimed that the strikes “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s nuclear enrichment infrastructure. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth echoed this sentiment, saying, “Iran’s nuclear ambitions have been obliterated.” Yet, two individuals briefed on the assessment stated that Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed. One of them added that the centrifuges “are largely intact.” Another source mentioned that the enriched uranium may have been removed from the targeted sites before the strikes occurred.

“So the (DIA) assessment is that the US set them back maybe a few months, tops,” said one of the sources.

Despite acknowledging the existence of the assessment, the White House firmly disagreed with its conclusions. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to CNN, “This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as ‘top secret’ but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community. The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran’s nuclear program. Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.”

While attending the NATO summit in the Netherlands, Trump dismissed CNN’s report in a Truth Social post, calling the operation “one of the most successful military strikes in history,” and claiming, “The nuclear sites in Iran are completely destroyed!”

Hegseth, also at the summit, clarified on Wednesday that the assessment was “a top secret report; it was preliminary; it was low confidence.” He suggested that the leak was politically motivated and said the FBI was investigating to identify the source of the leak.

The Pentagon continues to describe the strikes as an “overwhelming success.” Nonetheless, sources familiar with the matter emphasized that it is still early for a definitive analysis of the strikes’ effects. Intelligence gathering is ongoing, including within Iran itself.

Leading up to the US action, Israel had already been targeting Iranian nuclear sites. However, Israeli officials indicated they required US-deployed bunker buster bombs to complete the mission. American B-2 bombers dropped over a dozen such bombs on the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant and the Natanz Enrichment Complex. Yet, the bombs did not entirely destroy the centrifuges or the enriched uranium, according to the sources. The DIA concluded that damage was largely limited to aboveground facilities, including power infrastructure and buildings used in uranium metal conversion for potential weapons.

The Israeli evaluation also indicated that Fordow suffered less damage than initially anticipated. However, Israeli officials believe the combined strikes from both nations delayed Iran’s nuclear program by two years. They note that this delay assumes Iran can rebuild without interference—something Israel vows to prevent. It’s important to note that Israeli officials had already estimated a two-year delay before the US operation took place.

Hegseth reaffirmed the administration’s stance in a statement to CNN, saying, “Based on everything we have seen — and I’ve seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran’s ability to create nuclear weapons. Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran; so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the President and the successful mission.”

On Tuesday, Trump reiterated his confidence in the strikes, stating, “I think it’s been completely demolished,” and “Those pilots hit their targets. Those targets were obliterated, and the pilots should be given credit.”

When asked about the potential for Iran to rebuild, Trump responded, “That place is under rock. That place is demolished.”

Despite these confident assertions, Trump acknowledged that current intelligence is “inconclusive” and said more information is expected from Israel. Speaking from the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, he admitted, “The intelligence was very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don’t know. It could have been very severe.”

While the administration projects confidence, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine adopted a more cautious tone. He stated on Sunday that, given the ongoing nature of the damage assessment, it was “way too early” to determine whether Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been fully neutralized.

Republican Representative Michael McCaul, former chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, also struck a measured note. When asked by CNN, he declined to support Trump’s statement that Iran’s nuclear program had been “obliterated.” He explained, “I’ve been briefed on this plan in the past, and it was never meant to completely destroy the nuclear facilities, but rather cause significant damage. But it was always known to be a temporary setback.”

Weapons expert Jeffrey Lewis, a professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, reviewed commercial satellite images of the strike zones. He concurred that Iran’s nuclear program had not been eradicated. “The ceasefire came without either Israel or the United States being able to destroy several key underground nuclear facilities, including near Natanz, Isfahan and Parchin,” Lewis said. He noted that Parchin, a nuclear complex near Tehran, remains capable of helping Iran quickly reestablish its program. “These facilities could serve as the basis for the rapid reconstitution of Iran’s nuclear program.”

Classified briefings scheduled for both the Senate and the House were postponed on Tuesday. Sources said the all-Senate briefing was rescheduled for Thursday, while the House briefing also faced delays, with no immediate explanation or revised date provided.

Representative Pat Ryan, a Democrat from New York, commented on X that “Trump just cancelled a classified House briefing on the Iran strikes with zero explanation. The real reason? He claims he destroyed ‘all nuclear facilities and capability;’ his team knows they can’t back up his bluster and BS.”

The capability of the US’ Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs to effectively destroy Iran’s deeply buried nuclear sites has long been in question, particularly concerning the Fordow and Isfahan facilities. In fact, the US used Tomahawk missiles from a submarine against Isfahan, rather than deploying bunker buster bombs. One source explained this choice by noting that Isfahan’s lower levels are even deeper underground than Fordow’s and likely beyond the bomb’s reach.

Further complicating the picture, US officials believe Iran may possess undisclosed nuclear facilities that were not targeted and remain fully operational, according to two sources familiar with the intelligence.

Iran Strikes U.S. Base in Qatar in Retaliation for U.S. Attack on Nuclear Infrastructure

Staff ReporterDiplomacy, Global 0

Iran launched a barrage of ballistic missiles at a major U.S. military base in Qatar on Monday, marking its initial retaliation for the recent American airstrike that targeted crucial parts of Iran’s underground nuclear program. This marked a sharp escalation in tensions following a surprise U.S. operation over the weekend.

According to early reports, Iran fired a minimum of six missiles at targets in Qatar. Eyewitnesses on the ground in Doha, the nation’s capital, reported hearing explosions, while video footage circulated online appeared to show air defense systems being activated to intercept the incoming projectiles. The assault occurred shortly after Qatari authorities closed the country’s airspace. This preemptive move came in the wake of warnings from both the U.S. and U.K. embassies in Doha advising their citizens to remain indoors and seek immediate shelter.

In addition to the attack on the U.S. base in Qatar, Iranian state-controlled media claimed that Iran was also targeting American military installations in Iraq. However, a U.S. defense official speaking to Reuters clarified that, despite Iran’s claims, only the base in Qatar had come under direct attack.

Officials in Washington, including President Donald Trump’s team, were closely observing Iran’s reaction from the Situation Room in the White House, a senior official confirmed.

The Qatari government responded quickly and firmly to the missile strike. A spokesperson from the Qatari Foreign Ministry said that the country’s air defense systems had successfully intercepted all of the missiles launched by Iran and that there were no reported injuries or deaths. “We consider this a flagrant violation of the sovereignty of the State of Qatar, its airspace, international law, and the United Nations Charter,” said Majed al-Ansari, the ministry’s spokesperson, in a statement posted on X. He added, “We affirm that Qatar reserves the right to respond directly in a manner equivalent with the nature and scale of this brazen aggression, in line with international law.”

Given the weekend’s attacks, the targeting of Qatar—particularly the al-Udeid air base—had been anticipated. Al-Udeid, which was constructed in the mid-1990s, has long served as a strategic hub for U.S. military operations in the region. It acts as the forward headquarters for the U.S. Central Command and has played a pivotal role in numerous American military campaigns in the Middle East over the past two decades.

Approximately 10,000 American personnel are stationed at al-Udeid. The base also supports operations for the Royal Air Force and the Qatari military. Notably, in preparation for the recent escalation, U.S. aircraft had been relocated from the base in the days leading up to America’s joint offensive with Israel targeting Iranian nuclear sites.

In a potentially significant revelation, The New York Times reported that Iran may have coordinated the retaliatory strikes with Qatar in advance to reduce the likelihood of casualties. This strategy, if confirmed, echoes Tehran’s approach five years ago following the American assassination of one of its top military leaders, General Qassem Soleimani. At that time, Iran also launched a limited missile response that caused damage but was carefully calibrated to avoid provoking a full-scale conflict.

Such a symbolic form of retaliation may serve multiple purposes for Iran. Domestically, it can help appease public pressure for a strong response against perceived American aggression. Internationally, it keeps the door open for a diplomatic resolution to the ongoing nuclear standoff. By choosing a path of controlled escalation, Iran appears to be balancing its need to project strength with the strategic imperative to avoid a broader war.

Market reactions suggest that investors and analysts alike do not view Iran’s latest actions as a step toward wider regional conflict. Prices for benchmark crude oil in both London and New York markets dropped significantly following news of the missile attacks. This suggests that traders interpreted the situation as a measured response rather than the beginning of a major military escalation in the Persian Gulf, which is a key global energy hub.

While no American or Qatari personnel were injured and the damage to infrastructure appears to be minimal, the political implications of the strike are considerable. Iran’s decision to strike a base that hosts not just U.S. forces but also serves as a vital operational center for allied militaries in the region sends a clear signal of its readiness to retaliate—even if in a symbolic manner.

For its part, the U.S. administration has yet to release an official statement detailing its intended course of action following Iran’s missile launch. However, given the calculated nature of the Iranian strike and the apparent lack of casualties, some analysts believe that Washington may choose to de-escalate rather than respond with further military force.

This recent exchange highlights the fragile balance that characterizes U.S.-Iran relations, particularly when it comes to issues surrounding Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Over the past several years, tensions have repeatedly flared following incidents that range from the dismantling of the Iran nuclear deal to direct attacks on military personnel and infrastructure. Monday’s events are just the latest chapter in this volatile narrative.

As the situation develops, regional players and global powers alike will be watching closely for signs of either further confrontation or the possibility of a return to the negotiating table. Iran’s calculated missile launch, devoid of fatalities and seemingly coordinated to limit escalation, may be designed to offer exactly that choice.

US Updates Travel Advisories, Highlights Increased Caution for India and Dominican Republic

Staff ReporterGlobal, Travel 0

Over the past month, the U.S. State Department has revised several travel advisories affecting American citizens planning trips abroad. While some countries saw minimal adjustments, others—particularly India, Cuba, and the Dominican Republic—were subject to more specific and cautionary guidance, reflecting evolving global and regional developments under the current Trump administration.

Among the unchanged but updated countries is Switzerland, which retained its Level 1 travel rating—the safest classification on the State Department’s four-tier advisory scale. Minor changes were added for 2025, but no significant increase in risk was noted.

In contrast, the advisory levels for Cuba and the Dominican Republic were both raised, drawing distinct attention. The Dominican Republic, for instance, received a Level 2 rating accompanied by a more explicit warning about violent crime, despite the government’s efforts to enhance police presence in popular tourist areas. According to the June 18 advisory update, “Violent crime is a concern in the Dominican Republic despite more police presence in areas often visited by tourists.” The advisory also emphasized, “Do not display wealth and be wary of meeting individuals from online in secluded locations.”

India, another country that has drawn increased scrutiny, was also moved to a Level 2 rating as of June 16. This classification, labeled “exercise increased caution,” is the same level currently designated for several prominent European nations, including France and Italy. The Level 4 category, by contrast, is reserved for countries either actively at war or those without diplomatic ties to the United States.

The updated U.S. guidance for India flagged specific regions that American travelers should entirely avoid, particularly those areas where ongoing political or military tensions pose heightened risks. Among these is the northern region of Jammu and Kashmir, as well as the area along the eastern border with Pakistan. These warnings follow a series of hostile engagements between Indian and Pakistani forces, including a missile strike by India in early May on the Pakistani-controlled side of Kashmir. That military response was triggered by an April 22 attack that left 25 tourists dead in Indian-administered territory.

“Exercise increased caution in India due to crime and terrorism,” the updated advisory for India states. “Some areas have increased risk. Rape is one of the fastest-growing crimes in India. Violent crimes, including sexual assault, happen at tourist sites and other locations.”

Beyond the well-known conflict zones, other regions within India, such as Maharashtra and Telangana, have also been flagged for caution. These areas have occasionally experienced attacks targeting the Indian government, attributed to extremist factions operating in the country.

Further additions to the advisory include warnings related to the Indian government’s strict enforcement of immigration laws, especially for travelers entering the country from nearby nations such as Nepal and Pakistan—countries with which India has had tense relations. The U.S. State Department cautions that failing to comply with India’s entry requirements could have serious consequences.

“Violations of Indian immigration laws are taken very seriously,” the travel guidance warns. “India may imprison, fine, or deny entry to travelers without valid documents or the correct type of visa.”

Interestingly, this firm approach to immigration enforcement is mirrored in travel advisories issued by other countries about the United States itself. The Trump administration’s focus on restricting immigration and enforcing border regulations has led multiple foreign governments to issue their own stern warnings to citizens intending to visit the U.S.

Germany, for example, issued a notice through its Foreign Ministry in March 2025 outlining the legal risks associated with travel to the U.S. “A criminal conviction in the United States, false information regarding the purpose of stay, or even a slight overstay of the visa upon entry or exit can lead to arrest, detention, and deportation upon entry or exit,” the German advisory cautioned.

Similarly, the Canadian government has taken steps to inform its citizens about potential complications at U.S. borders. “Individual border agents often have significant discretion in making those determinations,” reads the Canadian government’s latest guidance. “U.S. authorities strictly enforce entry requirements. Expect scrutiny at ports of entry, including of electronic devices.”

These global travel advisory exchanges underscore a rising trend: countries are not only warning their citizens about conflict zones or crime in far-flung areas, but they are also providing detailed information about legal risks associated with immigration policy enforcement, even in countries historically considered safe travel destinations.

For the U.S., this more detailed advisory framework aims to help travelers make informed decisions about where they are going and what precautions they should take. Whether the risks are related to crime, terrorism, or complex immigration policies, the updated advisories reflect an increasingly interconnected world where political tensions, security issues, and border regulations all play a role in shaping how and where people move.

In the case of India, the U.S. has signaled that while much of the country remains relatively safe for travelers exercising basic precautions, certain regions are fraught with danger due to ongoing conflict and criminal activity. The explicit mention of sexual violence, including rape, as a growing problem reflects the serious safety concerns that have been the subject of international attention in recent years.

Similarly, the Dominican Republic’s inclusion of warnings about displaying wealth or meeting unknown persons in secluded areas shows a responsiveness to patterns of criminal activity that may target tourists. These changes demonstrate how travel advisories are now offering more than just general safety tips—they are responding to specific events, local dynamics, and broader geopolitical shifts.

As the Trump administration continues to reshape aspects of U.S. foreign policy and immigration enforcement, it’s likely that both American advisories about other countries and foreign warnings about travel to the U.S. will keep evolving. For travelers, this means paying close attention to official notices before booking a flight—not only to understand the risks abroad, but also to navigate changing border requirements and legal expectations at home and overseas.

NATO Summit Trimmed and Tailored to Appease Trump as Rutte Aims for Unity Amid Deep Divisions

Staff ReporterDiplomacy, Global 0

NATO summits are typically designed to present a united front, with outcomes largely predetermined in advance. The upcoming summit at The Hague, orchestrated by newly appointed NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, is no exception. In fact, the event appears to be carefully planned to avoid any confrontations with NATO’s most influential member, the United States. The core item on the agenda is a pledge by European allies to increase their defence spending—precisely what President Donald Trump has long demanded.

While this commitment is expected to take center stage, it comes with a mix of compromises and vague concessions. However, even a carefully managed summit cannot entirely obscure the ongoing rifts between Trump and many European leaders over issues like trade, Russia, and the deepening Middle East conflict.

Donald Trump, with his “America First” doctrine, has never been particularly enthusiastic about multinational institutions. His skepticism extends to NATO itself. During his first term, he not only criticized the alliance but also questioned its very foundation: collective defence. At his inaugural NATO summit, he openly scolded European allies for underfunding their militaries and claimed they owed the U.S. “massive amounts of money.” On that front, Trump has maintained a consistent stance throughout his political career.

Mark Rutte, known for maintaining a positive relationship with Trump, has made considerable efforts to deliver a diplomatic victory for the U.S. president. The upcoming NATO gathering will take place over two days—Tuesday and Wednesday next week—at the World Forum in The Hague. But the main deliberations will be brief, lasting just three hours, and the concluding summit declaration will be reduced to a mere five paragraphs. This minimalism is reportedly a response to Trump’s preferences.

Trump will be joined by 31 other leaders from NATO’s member states, along with representatives from more than a dozen partner countries. In preparation, Dutch authorities have launched the most extensive security operation in the country’s history, with the event’s cost reaching €183.4 million ($210 million or £155 million), making it the most expensive NATO summit ever.

Some observers suggest the abbreviated schedule is tailored to Trump’s reported short attention span and aversion to lengthy meetings. However, beyond catering to Trump, the short agenda also serves a strategic purpose—it limits the range of topics and helps conceal internal divisions within the alliance.

Ed Arnold, a defense analyst from the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), commented on Trump’s dominant presence at such events: “Trump likes to be the star of the show,” adding that he will likely take credit for pressuring European countries to act on defense. While Trump isn’t the first American president to criticize NATO spending habits, he has arguably had greater success than his predecessors.

Former U.S. Ambassador to NATO, Kurt Volker, acknowledged the tension: “Some European governments do not like the way Trump’s gone about it,” referencing Trump’s call for nations to spend 5% of their GDP on defense. Presently, Europe contributes just 30% of NATO’s total military spending. Yet, according to Volker, many Europeans have come to realize, “we needed to do this, even if it’s unfortunate that it took such a kick in the pants.”

Indeed, some European countries are now pushing their defense budgets toward that 5% target. These include nations near Russia, such as Poland, Estonia, and Lithuania. But the pressure is not solely coming from Washington. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has fundamentally shifted the security outlook across Europe, demanding increased defense commitments.

Nevertheless, the reality is that many NATO members are unlikely to meet these lofty new spending goals. Some have still failed to achieve the 2% GDP target established over a decade ago. Rutte has proposed a compromise: raising core defense spending to 3.5% of GDP, supplemented by an additional 1.5% in related expenditures.

However, the definition of “defense-related expenditure” remains so ambiguous that critics worry it could be manipulated. Rutte has suggested that infrastructure investments—such as roads, bridges, and railways—could count toward this total. As RUSI’s Ed Arnold noted, this will almost certainly lead to more “creative accounting.”

Even if this new benchmark is endorsed, many nations may only offer symbolic compliance, without serious plans to meet it by 2032 or 2035. The timeline remains hazy. Spain’s prime minister has already condemned the target as “unreasonable and counterproductive.” Meanwhile, British Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has avoided committing to a firm timeline for reaching 3% GDP spending. The current UK prime minister has only described it as an “ambition” for the next parliamentary term. Still, given the UK’s stated intent to place NATO at the center of its defense policy, Starmer may be compelled to support the new spending framework.

The danger lies in seeing the spending increase as just a political move, or simply yielding to U.S. demands. But NATO’s own internal defense strategies—particularly concerning potential aggression from Russia—are also a major motivator. Rutte himself has issued a stark warning: Russia could launch an attack on a NATO country within five years.

Though the full scope of NATO’s defense plans remains classified, Rutte has already indicated what is lacking. In a speech earlier this month, he said NATO requires “a 400% increase in its air and missile defences,” along with “thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks, and millions more artillery shells.”

Most member countries, including the UK, currently fall short of NATO’s capability targets. Consequently, Sweden has announced plans to double the size of its army, and Germany aims to expand its troop numbers by 60,000. NATO’s plans reportedly outline detailed procedures to defend the alliance’s eastern border in the event of a Russian invasion. General Christopher Donahue, head of the U.S. Army in Europe, recently highlighted the vulnerability of Polish and Lithuanian territory near the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad. He revealed, “we looked at our existing capabilities and realized very quickly they are not sufficient.”

Yet ironically, direct discussions about Russia and the war in Ukraine will be kept to a minimum at the summit. This reflects growing divergence between Europe and America on the issue. Kurt Volker observed, “Under Trump, the US does not see Ukrainian security as essential to European security but our European allies do.”

Trump has already eroded NATO unity by engaging with Vladimir Putin and suspending military aid to Ukraine. According to Ed Arnold, contentious subjects like Russia strategy have been deliberately excluded from the agenda to avoid provoking Trump.

Although Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has received an invitation to the summit dinner, he won’t be participating in the North Atlantic Council’s main discussions.

As Mark Rutte prepares to lead his first NATO summit, he likely hopes for a smooth and concise event. But given Trump’s fundamental disagreements with many of his allies—especially regarding Russia, NATO’s greatest strategic concern—the summit could still fall short of unity and coherence, despite efforts to the contrary.

MIT Tops QS World University Rankings for 14th Year as Asia Emerges Global Education Leader

Staff ReporterGlobal, Education 0

The latest edition of the QS World University Rankings, released by global higher education analysts QS Quacquarelli Symonds, marks the 22nd year of evaluating top institutions worldwide. This year’s ranking sees the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) maintaining its stronghold as the world’s number one university for the 14th consecutive time, underscoring its continuing leadership in research, innovation, and academic excellence.

The 2026 rankings reflect notable changes in the top tiers. Imperial College London retains its second-place position, while Stanford University leaps from sixth to third place, showcasing its growing global reputation and strong performance in key metrics. The University of Oxford, which held the third spot last year, moves to fourth, followed by Harvard University at fifth and the University of Cambridge at sixth. ETH Zurich, a consistent performer, remains in seventh, while the National University of Singapore holds onto eighth place. The University College London and the California Institute of Technology round out the top ten at ninth and tenth respectively.

The QS World University Rankings 2026 includes over 1,500 institutions across 106 different locations, reflecting an increasingly diverse and competitive academic environment. The United States continues to dominate the list in terms of volume, with 192 institutions featured. The United Kingdom follows with 90, and Mainland China with 72. India, with 54 universities, and Germany, with 48, complete the top five countries with the highest number of ranked institutions.

Ben Sowter, Senior Vice President at QS, emphasized the shifting dynamics in the global academic landscape. “We are witnessing a rebalancing of global academic influence,” he stated. “The Ranking highlights a shifting center of gravity in higher education—towards Asia, which now claims the highest number of ranked universities worldwide. While traditional powerhouses maintain strong positions, the data shows clear momentum in regions investing heavily in research capacity, internationalization, and long-term strategy. The QS World University Rankings illuminate not only institutional excellence, but also the evolving contours of global knowledge production. These shifts underscore an increasingly multipolar academic world—more competitive, more connected, and more ambitious than ever.”

One of the most significant takeaways from this year’s edition is Asia’s growing prominence in global education. For the first time, Asia leads all continents with 565 ranked universities, surpassing Europe with 487, the Americas with 358, Africa with 47, and Oceania with 44. Asia also welcomed the largest number of new entrants, with 84 new institutions joining the rankings. In contrast, only 10 new entrants came from the Americas, nine from Europe, eight from Africa, and just one from Oceania.

The United States, long considered the epicenter of academic excellence, registered a positive shift in performance. For the first time in seven years, more American institutions improved their rankings than declined. A prime example is Stanford University, which climbed into third place, largely due to its enhanced scores in the Sustainability and International Faculty metrics. Another significant development is the University of Chicago re-entering the global top 20, signaling renewed strength among U.S. universities.

The United Kingdom continues to be a key player in higher education, matching the U.S. with four institutions in the global top ten. British universities remain globally attractive destinations for students, maintaining a strong lead in the International Student Ratio metric.

In Canada, a leadership change has occurred at the national level. McGill University has overtaken the University of Toronto as the country’s highest-ranked institution, now positioned at 27th globally. Canadian universities are particularly noted for their performance in Sustainability metrics, reinforcing the country’s commitment to environmentally responsible education and research.

Australia, meanwhile, registers a mixed performance. Although it continues to have two institutions in the top 20, the University of Sydney has dropped to 25th place. Moreover, 71% of Australian institutions saw a decline in rankings, signaling challenges ahead for its higher education sector amid global competition.

China’s educational ascent continues steadily. About 45% of Chinese institutions improved their rankings, reflecting sustained national investment in research and global partnerships. Tsinghua University climbed to 17th globally, while Fudan University made an impressive nine-place jump to reach 30th.

India also makes a notable move this year. IIT Delhi has emerged as the top-ranked Indian university, securing the 123rd spot and overtaking IIT Bombay. This marks a significant milestone in India’s efforts to elevate its global academic standing and increase research visibility.

Other countries also recorded breakthroughs. Italy and Saudi Arabia have made their way into the global top 100 for the first time. Italy’s Politecnico di Milano now ranks 98th, and Saudi Arabia’s King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) reached 67th, showcasing the growing global recognition of institutions from non-traditional education powerhouses.

Africa also shows signs of upward momentum, particularly in South Africa. The University of Cape Town saw a significant improvement, climbing 21 places to reach 150th. South African institutions continue to dominate the African continent, holding the top four positions in the region.

Overall, the 2026 QS World University Rankings provide a comprehensive view of how the global academic landscape is evolving. It highlights not just institutional rankings but also broader regional shifts, investments in innovation, and strategic internationalization. This edition underlines how countries outside the traditional Western sphere are now playing a pivotal role in shaping the future of higher education.

As Ben Sowter succinctly put it, “These shifts underscore an increasingly multipolar academic world—more competitive, more connected, and more ambitious than ever.” The QS World University Rankings continue to serve as a benchmark for academic excellence and a mirror reflecting the changing dynamics of global knowledge production.

Mixed Reactions Among Iranians as Israel Targets Iran in Escalating Conflict

Staff ReporterGlobal, Youth 0

Israel’s recent large-scale air strikes on Iran have ignited a powerful wave of reactions among Iranians, both within the country and in exile. The attacks, launched last Friday, provoked a swift response from Tehran in the form of missile barrages. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a video address that same day, directed a message not only at Iran’s leadership but also at its people. He asserted that while Israel’s goal remained halting Iran’s nuclear ambitions, “we are also clearing the path for you to achieve your freedom.”

This statement struck a chord with various segments of Iran’s fractured opposition. While some exiled groups and individuals welcomed Netanyahu’s message, others responded with skepticism or outright distrust. The lack of organized opposition within Iran itself, due to decades of repression, has made it difficult to gauge a unified stance. The government has long suppressed dissent through imprisonment, mass executions in the 1980s, and tight restrictions on civil liberties. This has pushed much of the organized opposition outside the country, particularly figures like Reza Pahlavi, son of Iran’s last Shah, and the Mojahedin-e Khalq Organisation (MEK), both of which are among the most prominent groups working in exile.

Contacting ordinary Iranians for comment has grown increasingly difficult as the authorities continue to limit internet and social media access, especially during times of unrest or foreign military threats. Despite these constraints, several young Iranians opposed to the regime have spoken out anonymously in recent days, describing their fear, disillusionment, and conflicting feelings about the current situation.

Tara, a 26-year-old who has participated in past protests, described how the authorities manipulate infrastructure and communication during Israeli attacks. “When Israel issues evacuation warnings ahead of strikes, authorities shut off internet access so that people don’t find out and the death toll rises,” she said. According to Tara, the regime also creates traffic congestion by setting up toll booths and checkpoints. “Talking about patriotism, unity, and standing up to the enemy is absurd,” she added. “The enemy has been killing us slowly for decades. The enemy is the Islamic Republic!”

Israel has been using platforms like Telegram and X to warn civilians in Iran, but both apps are banned in the country. With reduced internet access, many Iranians cannot access these alerts. This digital blackout further isolates citizens during crises and magnifies their vulnerability.

Sima, 27, expressed resignation and fatigue rather than hope or outrage. “I wish Israel would get the job done as soon as possible. I’m exhausted,” she admitted. “Although I’m still not a fan of Israel or what it’s doing, I hope they’d finish what they’ve started. Wishful thinking, I know. But I want them to rid us and the world of the threat of the IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps], [Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei and ayatollahs as a whole.”

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, oversees the IRGC, the elite unit charged with protecting the Islamic Republic and its ballistic missile arsenal. The Israeli strikes have resulted in the deaths of numerous high-ranking IRGC members, including commander Hossein Salami.

Some young Iranians were even more unequivocal in their endorsement of Israel’s military actions. Amir, a 23-year-old, voiced full support. “100%,” he said when asked if he backed the attacks. “Not the UN, not Europe, not even us. We tried, remember? And they killed us in the streets. I’m joyful when the people who’ve crushed our lives finally taste fear. We deserve that much.”

Amir was referencing the 2022 nationwide protests that erupted after Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old woman, died in police custody following her arrest for allegedly violating the dress code. The Iran Human Rights group, based in Norway, documented 537 protester deaths during the ensuing crackdown. While international observers decried the bloodshed, Iranian authorities claimed “security forces acted with responsibility,” blaming the unrest on violent demonstrators and foreign influences.

Netanyahu invoked the protesters’ rallying cry — “woman, life, freedom” — in both English and Persian during his recent speech, urging the Iranian people to rise and “let your voices be heard.” While the Iranian government has not officially responded, hardline figures and state-aligned media have mocked the Israeli leader’s remarks. Officials have also issued stern warnings against circulating statements or propaganda from Israel or the U.S.

Still, not all Iranians opposing the regime believe Netanyahu has their best interests in mind. Navid, a 25-year-old activist who was briefly detained during the 2022 protests, voiced deep concern. “I participated in the protests because I had hope for a regime change then. I just don’t see how the regime could be overthrown in this conflict without Iran itself being destroyed in the process,” he said. “Israel is killing ordinary people as well. At some point, people will start to take the side of the Islamic Republic.”

Darya, 26, interpreted the public silence in Iran as a direct answer to Netanyahu’s appeal. “I think the fact that people are not coming out to protest is already a clear response,” she observed. “I wouldn’t go even if Israel bombed my house. Netanyahu is hiding behind Iranian nationalist slogans and pretends he’s helping Iranians reach freedom while he’s targeted residential areas. It’s going to take years just to rebuild the country.”

For many, the situation has grown too morally and emotionally complex to pick a side. Arezou, 22, captured this confusion. “I hate the regime, and I hate what it’s done to us. But when I see bombs falling, I think of my grandmother, my little cousin. And I’ve seen what Netanyahu did to Gaza — do you really think he cares about Iranians? This isn’t about us, it’s about [Israeli] politics,” she said. “I feel like I have to choose between two evils, and I can’t. I just want my people safe. I want to breathe without fear.”

Mina, 27, echoed this sentiment, voicing frustration and sorrow at the limited choices left to her generation. “I want this regime gone more than anything — but not like this. Not through more bombs, more death,” she said. “Israel is not our saviour. When innocent people die, it’s not a step toward freedom, it’s another form of injustice. I don’t want to trade one kind of terror for another. I’m against this regime and also against this war. We deserve a better way out than this.”

As the conflict escalates and the violence intensifies, Iranians — particularly the youth — are left to wrestle with a complex blend of anger, grief, exhaustion, and hope. While some see Israel’s intervention as a possible catalyst for long-awaited change, others fear it may only bring more destruction without delivering true liberation. The road to freedom, for many, remains as uncertain as ever.

Flight Chaos Grips Europe’s Busiest Airports as Over 500 Flights Affected in One Day

Staff ReporterGlobal, Travel 0

More than 300 flights were cancelled and delayed across three major European international airports — London Heathrow, Amsterdam Schiphol, and Paris Charles de Gaulle — on a day marked by widespread disruption. Global airlines including Air France, American Airlines, Emirates, Singapore Airlines, Qatar Airways, United Airlines, and Oman Air were among those affected by a fresh bout of operational turbulence. The disruptions were caused by a mix of staffing shortages, delays in gate allocation, ground handling problems, and tight aircraft rotations, which created a chain reaction of delays and cancellations from morning to night. These three airports, acting as major transatlantic and intercontinental gateways, served as the starting point for disruptions that quickly spread to Asia, the Middle East, and North America.

Though no single cause such as adverse weather or strikes was identified, airport authorities pointed to “mounting internal strain” as the primary reason behind today’s widespread interruptions.

Heathrow’s Travel Plans Thrown Off Course

At London Heathrow, passengers encountered significant disruptions. The airport reported 54 delayed flights and eight cancellations, impacting both long-haul and short-haul services. Among the airlines most affected, British Airways experienced ten delayed flights. Finnair cancelled three flights and had one delayed, representing one of the highest cancellation ratios of the day at the airport.

Air India, which operates several routes connecting India through Heathrow, reported two flight cancellations and seven delays — a delay rate of 50 percent for the day. WestJet cancelled both of its scheduled flights, equating to a full 100 percent cancellation rate. Meanwhile, American Airlines faced six delayed flights, and Emirates and United Airlines each reported two delays.

The disruption wasn’t confined to large carriers. Even regional and smaller airlines such as Brussels Airlines, Aegean, Eurowings, and Etihad Airways each had at least one delayed flight. This cascading effect across different airlines signaled broader operational instability.

Amsterdam Schiphol Hit Hardest by Delays

Amsterdam Schiphol reported the most extensive impact, logging 104 delays and 20 cancellations in total. KLM, the airport’s largest carrier, was at the center of the turmoil with 43 delayed and 16 cancelled flights, significantly affecting European and transatlantic operations.

Delta Air Lines experienced seven delays and one cancellation at Schiphol, while Finnair, Cathay Pacific, and China Cargo each had cancellations. Smaller and cargo airlines like Cargolux, Amelia, Kuwait Airways, Malaysia Airlines, and Bulgaria Air were also caught in the mess.

Low-cost giant easyJet faced 11 delayed flights, further illustrating how the disruptions reverberated across the European travel network.

Air France Bears the Brunt at Paris Charles de Gaulle

At Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport, Air France experienced the most significant disruptions. With 58 delayed flights and eight cancellations, it was the single most affected airline across all three hubs.

The airport itself tallied 104 delayed flights and 13 cancellations, closely matching Amsterdam’s totals. Finnair cancelled three flights, while Air India, Cathay Pacific, and Delta Air Lines each faced a combination of delays and cancellations.

Regional airlines such as KM Malta Airlines, Kenya Airways, Air Senegal, and HOP! were also affected, with varying degrees of delay. American Airlines, United Airlines, and Emirates each logged two delays, indicating that even major international carriers weren’t immune to the operational snags.

Total Disruptions Cross 500 Flights in a Day

The cumulative impact at Heathrow, Schiphol, and Charles de Gaulle added up to 283 flight cancellations and 262 delays, totaling 545 disrupted flights in just one day. Though no single trigger was officially cited, representatives from various airports described the cause as “operational challenges” — a broad term encompassing issues like air traffic control limitations, staffing shortages, rotation problems, and logistical slowdowns on the ground.

While not as disruptive as severe weather or airspace closures, these operational setbacks led to widespread chaos, especially for transatlantic routes. Flights connecting Europe and the U.S. were among the most impacted, with disruptions on both sides of the Atlantic.

Snapshot of the Day’s Turmoil

London Heathrow (LHR) reported 8 cancellations and 54 delays.

Notable disruptions included:

  • Air India: 2 cancelled, 7 delayed
  • British Airways: 1 cancelled, 10 delayed
  • Finnair: 3 cancelled, 1 delayed
  • WestJet: 2 cancelled, no delays
  • American Airlines: 6 delayed
  • Emirates and United Airlines: 2 delayed each
  • Other airlines such as Air France, Delta, Etihad, Eurowings, Gulf Air, and Qatar Airways also reported single-digit delays.

Amsterdam Schiphol (AMS) saw 20 cancellations and 104 delays.

Heaviest impacted carriers:

  • KLM: 16 cancelled, 43 delayed
  • Delta Air Lines: 1 cancelled, 7 delayed
  • easyJet: 11 delayed
  • Additional delays were reported by carriers including German Airways, Transavia, Vueling, China Cargo, Kuwait Airways, and Air India.

Paris Charles de Gaulle (CDG) had 13 cancellations and 104 delays.

Air France led with:

  • 8 cancellations and 58 delays

Other disruptions included:

  • Finnair: 3 cancellations
  • Air India and Cathay Pacific: 1 cancellation each
  • American, Emirates, Delta, United, and Qatar Airways each logged multiple delays
  • Regional players like Air Senegal, HOP!, and KM Malta Airlines were also impacted.

Far-Reaching Global Effects

The chaos was not limited to Europe. Given that all three airports serve as crucial transit points for flights to Asia, North America, and the Middle East, the disruptions had far-reaching implications. Airlines such as Singapore Airlines, Qatar Airways, Oman Air, and Saudia were also caught in the ripple effect.

Even a single delayed flight on these long-haul routes can create a chain of disruptions across an entire airline network. “Passengers are being advised to check their flight status directly with their airline and allow extra time for travel,” said an airport spokesperson. The interconnected nature of global aviation means that a breakdown in one hub can affect flights as far away as Dallas, Delhi, or Dubai.

As airlines and airport authorities worked throughout the day to regain control of their operations, the situation remained fluid. Experts warned that the global air travel ecosystem is so tightly linked that even small local disruptions can escalate into large-scale delays. One airline official summed it up by saying, “The sheer scale of global airline interdependence means even a localized hiccup in one of Europe’s major airports can cause delays and missed connections as far afield as Delhi, Dubai, or Dallas.”

In conclusion, today’s events highlighted the fragility of international flight networks. Despite no single catastrophic trigger, the interplay of multiple operational challenges across Europe’s busiest hubs caused widespread disruption. The episode underscores the need for better contingency planning and enhanced ground and staff readiness as the global air travel industry continues to recover and expand.

US Military Ramps Up Aerial Activity in Europe Amid Escalating Iran-Israel Tensions

Staff ReporterGlobal, USA 0

In the past three days, no fewer than 30 US military aircraft have been redeployed from bases across the United States to Europe, as confirmed by flight tracking data analyzed by BBC Verify. The specific aircraft involved are all military tanker planes, which are primarily used for in-air refueling of combat aircraft such as fighter jets and bombers.

These tankers, especially the KC-135 Stratotankers, have made stopovers at American airbases located in Spain, Scotland, and England. Flight monitoring service Flightradar24 documented that at least seven of these aircraft had transited through these European bases.

This notable increase in military aviation movement coincides with rising tensions between Iran and Israel. The conflict flared up following an Israeli operation conducted last Friday, which officials in Tel Aviv claimed was aimed at dismantling Iran’s nuclear development program.

Although there is no official confirmation linking these US aircraft movements directly to the Israel-Iran conflict, military experts believe the timing and nature of the deployments are significant. Justin Bronk, a senior analyst at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), remarked to BBC Verify that the air tanker activity is “highly unusual.” He further noted that the redeployments are “highly suggestive” of preparations by the United States to implement contingency plans that could potentially involve “intensive combat operations” in the region in the near future.

All seven tankers tracked have since moved onward, with most flying east of Sicily by Tuesday afternoon, based on available tracking data. While six of the aircraft had undisclosed destinations, one was confirmed to have landed on the Greek island of Crete.

Adding further perspective, Vice-Admiral Mark Mellett, former chief of the Irish Defence Forces, suggested the aircraft movements may form part of a wider US strategy centered around “strategic ambiguity.” According to him, this tactic could be designed to pressure Iran into making concessions during ongoing negotiations regarding its nuclear program.

The timeline of recent developments is also telling. Israel’s initial strike on Iranian nuclear sites occurred on Friday, only one day after a deadline set by US President Donald Trump for Iran to come to an agreement on suspending its nuclear initiatives had lapsed.

Parallel to the increased air traffic, there are reports indicating that the US has repositioned the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier. Previously stationed in the South China Sea, the Nimitz is now reportedly en route to the Middle East. Reuters reported that a scheduled engagement involving the carrier in Vietnam was canceled due to what the US embassy in Hanoi described as an “emergent operational requirement.”

Data from MarineTraffic, a platform that tracks maritime movements, showed that the USS Nimitz was last observed navigating the Malacca Strait toward Singapore early Tuesday. This warship not only transports a squadron of fighter jets but is also accompanied by multiple guided missile destroyers, forming a powerful naval task force.

Further reinforcing its presence in the region, the US has deployed multiple advanced fighter jets—including F-16s, F-22s, and F-35s—to various bases across the Middle East. According to three defense officials who spoke to Reuters, the tanker planes relocated to Europe are capable of refueling these jets during prolonged operations.

On Tuesday, US Vice-President JD Vance added fuel to the speculation of increased American involvement in the region. In a social media post, he suggested that the US may take direct military action to support Israel’s offensive against Iran’s nuclear capabilities. “Trump may decide he needs to take further action,” he stated, referring to potential efforts to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program.

Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is known to include two key underground enrichment facilities. One is at Natanz, a site already targeted by Israeli forces. The second is Fordo, located deep within a mountain near the city of Qom. Penetrating the hardened Fordo site would likely require the use of the GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), according to two senior Western military officers who spoke to BBC Verify.

These “bunker buster” bombs weigh an enormous 30,000 pounds (13,600 kilograms) and are capable of piercing up to 200 feet (60 meters) of reinforced concrete. The only aircraft in the US military arsenal that can carry such a weapon is the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber.

Recently, the United States stationed a B-2 bomber squadron at its base on Diego Garcia, an island strategically located in the Indian Ocean. Though the island is situated approximately 2,400 miles from Iran’s southern coast, military analysts argue that this distance places Iran well within operational reach.

Air Marshall Greg Bagwell, a former deputy operations chief with the Royal Air Force, explained the strategic advantage of using Diego Garcia as a launch point. “You would be able to maintain a sustained operation from [Diego Garcia] far more efficiently,” he told BBC Verify. “You could literally have them round the clock operating.”

However, the most recent satellite images of Diego Garcia no longer show the presence of B-2 bombers on the island. This discrepancy has raised eyebrows among defense analysts. Vice-Admiral Mellett said, “I would expect to see the bombers on the island ahead of any operation targeting Iran,” adding that their absence represents “a missing piece of the jigsaw.”

Air Marshall Bagwell concurred with this observation but pointed out that B-2 bombers are capable of undertaking 24-hour missions and could theoretically launch a strike from the continental United States itself if the President were to authorize an attack.

“They’ve taken away any means for Iran to now defend itself,” Bagwell concluded. “Which obviously leaves any military or even the nuclear targets pretty much at the mercy of whatever Israel wants to do to it.”

As the situation continues to evolve, the flurry of military activity by the US—both aerial and naval—has added a new layer of complexity to the ongoing Iran-Israel tensions. Whether these moves signal preparations for a potential military campaign or serve as a calculated warning remains uncertain. Nonetheless, the rapid redeployment of tanker aircraft, stealth bombers, fighter jets, and naval assets suggests that Washington is readying itself for a broad range of contingencies.

Modi Heads to Canada for G-7 Summit Amid Global Conflicts and Diplomatic Reset

Staff ReporterGlobal, Diplomacy 0

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to arrive in Calgary, Canada, on Monday, June 16, 2025, to participate in the G-7 Outreach Summit. The summit, to be hosted in Kananaskis, Alberta, is attracting global attention due to its timing amid intensifying conflicts in both the Middle East and Eastern Europe. The ongoing Israel-Iran tensions and the continued Russia-Ukraine war provide a crucial backdrop to this high-level multilateral gathering. Among the prominent global figures joining Modi at the summit is Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, underscoring the relevance of security discussions in the current geopolitical climate.

Modi’s trip to Canada, which follows a short stopover in Cyprus, is being closely observed as it marks a potential turning point in India-Canada relations. This visit is expected to pave the way for a diplomatic thaw between the two nations following a significant deterioration in ties under former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Relations hit a low point after Trudeau publicly accused the Indian government of involvement in the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a prominent pro-Khalistan activist, on June 18, 2023.

Trudeau’s explosive allegation in September 2023, that “Indian state actors” were behind Nijjar’s murder on Canadian soil, caused a major diplomatic rift. The accusation led to expulsions of diplomats, suspension of talks, and strained people-to-people ties between the two democracies. As Modi now prepares to meet Canada’s new leader, Prime Minister Mark Carney, observers hope for a fresh chapter.

Carney, who assumed office following Trudeau’s departure, has indicated a willingness to move past the previous administration’s tensions. Significantly, he has acknowledged India’s expanding global footprint and emphasized the need for constructive engagement with the world’s largest democracy. In an earlier statement, Carney remarked that “India’s global profile requires engagement,” suggesting his administration is seeking to normalize ties with New Delhi.

This diplomatic reset coincides with Prime Minister Modi’s first appearance at a major international event since India concluded Operation Sindoor in May 2025. The military operation targeted terror networks across Pakistan and received international attention. The G-7 Outreach Summit thus provides Modi with a timely platform to engage with global leaders and position India’s security and diplomatic priorities.

During the summit, Modi is expected to hold discussions with multiple heads of state, including host Prime Minister Carney and other members of the G-7 as well as guest nations. The event promises to be a venue for strategic dialogue, coalition-building, and multilateral coordination. Modi’s interactions at the summit are likely to touch on issues ranging from counterterrorism to economic cooperation and energy security.

The G-7 Outreach Summit, scheduled for Tuesday at noon, will focus on three key themes that reflect the current international climate. The first theme, “Protecting our communities around the world,” is expected to encompass a wide array of discussions, including defense cooperation, counterterrorism, cyber threats, and humanitarian crises. With conflicts like those in Ukraine and Gaza continuing unabated, leaders will deliberate on ways to shield civilians and prevent further escalations.

The second core issue is “Building energy security and accelerating the digital transition.” This topic is highly relevant given the dual challenges posed by geopolitical instability and the global energy crisis. As nations seek alternatives to fossil fuels and aim for sustainable energy sources, digitalization is increasingly becoming a central pillar of national development strategies. The summit is likely to explore avenues for collaboration in clean energy, semiconductor supply chains, and 5G infrastructure.

The third and final theme, “Securing the partnerships of the future,” emphasizes the importance of fostering resilient international alliances. This is particularly crucial at a time when traditional multilateral structures are under stress and new alignments are emerging. The summit may also include deliberations on reforming global institutions and developing mechanisms for inclusive growth and equitable development.

Besides India and Ukraine, the summit will include leaders from Australia, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, and South Korea as special invitees. Their presence signifies the growing recognition that global challenges require broad-based cooperation beyond the G-7 nations. These countries represent diverse regions and bring valuable perspectives to the table, especially in addressing issues like climate change, global trade, and digital equity.

Following his diplomatic engagements in Canada, Prime Minister Modi will depart on Tuesday evening for Zagreb, Croatia, which marks the final leg of his three-nation tour. This visit comes at a critical time for Indian foreign policy, as it seeks to consolidate alliances, rebuild frayed ties, and assert its strategic interests on the global stage.

The upcoming meeting between Modi and Carney is expected to be a closely watched event. While the specifics of the bilateral dialogue are yet to be disclosed, the broader context suggests that both leaders are interested in de-escalating the diplomatic standoff that defined the latter years of Trudeau’s tenure. The murder of Nijjar had cast a long shadow on India-Canada relations, and Modi’s visit is seen as an attempt to move beyond the impasse.

Observers note that the shift in leadership in Canada offers a fresh opportunity for reconciliation. Carney’s pragmatic approach to foreign policy and his willingness to recognize India’s importance in the global order are crucial factors in resetting the bilateral agenda. India, on its part, has consistently rejected Trudeau’s accusations, terming them “absurd” and “politically motivated,” and has maintained that it seeks constructive ties with Ottawa.

As the G-7 Outreach Summit convenes, it also provides a timely forum for leaders to exchange views on managing a world in flux. With the war in Ukraine dragging on, tensions flaring in the Middle East, and economic uncertainties looming, the stakes are high. For India, which has long advocated for multipolarity and reform of global governance institutions, the summit offers a platform to advance its vision of a more balanced and inclusive international order.

Modi’s participation in the G-7 Outreach Summit in Canada represents more than just a diplomatic engagement. It reflects India’s evolving role on the global stage, its readiness to mend fractured ties, and its commitment to working with like-minded nations on shared challenges. As he moves on to Croatia, the outcomes of this summit and his interactions with leaders like Carney will be closely analyzed for signs of strategic alignment and future cooperation.

Israel-Iran Conflict Sparks Oil Price Fluctuations, Raising Global Economic Concerns

Staff ReporterEconomy, Global 0

Tensions between Israel and Iran recently sent ripples through global financial markets, initially prompting a surge in oil prices. The episode, which involved the exchange of missile and drone strikes between the two nations, had investors bracing for prolonged disruption in energy supplies. However, after the weekend of hostilities, the oil market has somewhat calmed, with crude prices retreating from their peak, although they remain significantly higher than they were a month ago.

Currently, oil is trading at around $74.50 per barrel, down from a high of over $78 recorded last Friday, yet still $10 more than it was four weeks ago. Brent Crude, the primary international oil benchmark, responded almost instantly to the conflict. This pattern of fluctuation is not uncommon; oil prices typically react to geopolitical instability and economic uncertainties.

Despite the recent increase, prices are far below the levels seen a year ago and considerably lower than the 2022 spike following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, when oil nearly touched $130 a barrel. That earlier surge had far-reaching consequences, causing price hikes in everything from fuel to food across the globe.

The big question now is whether this recent rise in oil prices will translate into higher costs for consumers worldwide. Historically, increases in wholesale oil prices have led to higher petrol prices at the pump, something that directly impacts millions. However, the ripple effects extend beyond petrol. Rising energy costs often trickle into the prices of consumer goods, manufacturing, and farming activities.

Energy is a vital input in the agricultural sector, impacting the cost of running farm machinery, processing food, and transporting goods. “A rough rule of thumb is a $10 rise in the oil price would add about 7p to the price at the pump,” explained David Oxley from Capital Economics. He emphasized that while oil is central to the story, it’s not the only concern.

Gas prices also play a critical role, particularly in countries like the UK where many homes are heated using gas and electricity rates are influenced by gas costs. According to Mr. Oxley, gas prices too have climbed following last week’s attacks, although the effect on household bills may take time to materialize due to how pricing and regulations function in that market.

This situation has revived concerns reminiscent of the energy crisis that followed the Ukraine war. Then, a sharp rise in gas prices contributed heavily to global inflation, further squeezing household budgets. Whether a similar chain of events occurs now depends largely on how the Israel-Iran conflict unfolds in the coming weeks.

Richard Bronze, head of geopolitics at Energy Aspects, described the present state of affairs as “very significant and concerning.” Nonetheless, he cautioned that it might not reach the level of impact seen during the Ukraine conflict or past crises in the Middle East.

The key uncertainties revolve around how long the hostilities between Israel and Iran continue, whether neighboring countries become entangled, and what role the United States might play in mitigating tensions. Most crucially, markets are closely watching the Strait of Hormuz — a narrow maritime passage off Iran’s southern coast through which about 20 percent of the world’s oil supply is transported. “It’s a narrow choke point so it is a significant weak spot for global oil markets,” noted Mr. Bronze.

Although direct disruption in the Strait of Hormuz remains unlikely, Iran has previously made threats involving the route, and the current scenario has marginally raised the likelihood of such a move. Even the mere possibility of this kind of interference is contributing to upward pressure on oil prices, according to Mr. Bronze.

Still, analysts argue that absent actual shipping disruptions, prices are unlikely to remain elevated. Unlike in 2022, when demand surged as the world economy reopened post-Covid, today’s global economic conditions are more subdued. Additionally, countries like Saudi Arabia and Brazil have spare production capacity, which could be utilized to increase supply and bring prices down.

Looking at the broader picture, the potential economic consequences depend largely on how the conflict evolves. Should it escalate significantly, the world could face another energy-related shock. “It does have the potential to be a bad shock for the global economy at a bad time,” warned Mohammed El-Erian, chief economic adviser at Allianz.

“Whichever way you look at it, it’s negative short-term, it’s negative longer-term,” Mr. El-Erian added. “It’s another shock to the stability of the US-led global economic order at a time when there were already a lot of questions.”

If oil prices were to surge past $100 a barrel again, Capital Economics estimates this could push inflation in advanced economies up by as much as 1%. That would complicate efforts by central banks to lower interest rates, potentially prolonging the high-rate environment and making borrowing more expensive for consumers and businesses.

However, David Oxley believes that such an extreme scenario remains unlikely. “Instability in the Middle East is nothing new, we’ve seen numerous bouts of it,” he said. “In a week’s time it might have all blown over.”

Overall, while the markets have been quick to react to the Israel-Iran tensions, the long-term impact will depend on a complex mix of geopolitical developments, oil supply dynamics, and the resilience of global economic systems. For now, consumers and businesses alike are bracing for the possibility of higher costs but hoping for a swift de-escalation that could stabilize energy markets once again.

AAPI Gains Membership to the International Association of Medical Regulatory Authorities

Ajay GhoshHealth, Global 0

“We are thrilled to share with you all today as the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) has accomplished a major milestone in our mission to elevate the role and recognition of Indian medical professionals across the globe,” said, Dr. Satheesh Kathula, President of AAPI.  “The International Association of Medical Regulatory Authorities (IAMRA) has formally accepted AAPI’s application for Partner membership.”

With this acceptance, AAPI joins an influential global network that includes regional, national, and international medical boards of leading medical regulatory bodies, including organizations such as the AAMC, ECFMG, FSMB, and numerous U.S. state medical boards, as well as the national medical boards from India such as Gujarat, Karnataka, Delhi, and the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS).

Currently IAMRA has 116 member organizations from 44 countries, united by a shared vision: “Everyone around the world is treated and cared for by safe and competent doctors.”

IAMRA’s mission is to promote effective medical regulation worldwide by fostering best practices, encouraging innovation, enabling collaboration, and supporting knowledge-sharing to ensure public safety and enhance global healthcare quality.

“We extend our sincere thanks to Dr. Lokesh Edara, past Chairman of the AAPI Board of Trustees, for his initiative and leadership in this endeavor.”

According to Dr. Lokesh Edara, who has been leading the efforts for AAPI’s Global Medical Education Initiatives, AAPI has been collaborating with the Government of India on efforts with “the objective of making every MBBS graduate from India to be the best in the world through programs and activities on AAPI platform. We now look forward to working closely with IAMRA and its members to strengthen our shared mission and ensure that the voices of Indian-origin physicians are heard and respected worldwide.”

“This achievement reaffirms AAPI’s commitment to collaborating with international medical regulatory authorities; Bridging professional gaps between Indian and global healthcare systems; Building stronger platforms for Indian-origin physicians; and advocating for policy harmonization and mutual recognition of qualifications. Thank you for your continued support as we take this proud step forward,” said Dr. Kathula.

The AAPI Ad Hoc Committee on Medical Regulation has been established to provide expert insight and guidance on matters related to medical licensing and regulatory standards across the United States. Chaired by Dr. Srini Gangasani, Chairman of the Georgia Medical Board, the committee will serve as a resource for evaluating current regulatory frameworks and proposing recommendations to ensure consistency, transparency, and efficiency in the medical licensing process. This initiative reflects AAPI’s continued commitment to supporting high standards in medical practice and ensuring a fair and effective regulatory environment for healthcare professionals.

Serving 1 in every 7 patients in the US, AAPI members care for millions of patients every day, while several of them have risen to hold high-flying jobs, shaping the policies and programs, and inventions that shape the landscape of healthcare in the US and around the world.

Since its inception in 1982, AAPI has been at the forefront, representing a conglomeration of more than 125,000 practicing physicians in the United States, seeking to be the united voice for the physicians of Indian origin. For more information on AAPI and its programs and initiatives, please visit:  www.aapiusa.org

Global Malayalee Festival Rescheduled For January 1 & 2, 2026 In Kochi, India

Staff ReporterCulture, Global 0
The Global Malayalee Festival is rescheduled and will now be held from January 1 – 2, 2026, at the Crown Plaza, Kochi, India, the Malayalee Festival Federation, an NGO registered in India as a Section 8, Not For Profit Company, has announced here today .

Living thousands of miles away from this beautiful land of diverse traditions, yet the center of global ambitions, every Malayalee longs to be connected with and rediscover her/his roots. The fist ever Global Malayalee Festival planned to be held in Kochi, the most modern and ancient city of the state of Kerala, promises to offer millions of Malayalees spread across the globe, a unique opportunity to “Bond Beyond Borders,” to experience and relive the rich cultural heritage of Kerala.

The Festival 2026 brings together Malayalee diaspora leaders, innovators, and visionaries from around the globe to discuss and collaborate on shaping future technologies and their impact on global communities. According to the organizers, “Malayalees from 53 countries representing all five continents have joined the Global Malayalee Festival as advisors, ambassadors, and coordinators. We expect to create a global networking of New Gen, Businesspeople, and Technocrats.”

“We are anticipating several foreign dignitaries, including representatives of Royal families in the Gulf, the Finnish Prime Minister, Malayalee MPs from the UK and South Africa, Central Cabinet Ministers,  Kerala Chief Minister and other Ministers from Kerala, MPs, MLAS and Political leaders. We will have Malayalee Political Leaders from foreign countries like Mr. Sojan Joseph. Member of Parliament, United Kingdom, and Mr. Anil Pillai, a Member of the Provincial Parliament, South Africa.

“We urge Malayalees from all over the world to come and be part of the two-day festival. This is the first time such an event is being organized,” Andrew Pappachen, the Director & Chief Organizing Officer of the Global Malayalee Festival said. “Come and be be part of the cultural celebrations, celebrating our achievements, transformative discussions, and groundbreaking ideas at the inaugural Global Malayalee Festival in Kochi.”

The festival will feature keynote sessions, panel discussions, cultural showcases, and networking opportunities designed to celebrate and empower the Malayalee diaspora’s contributions to the cultural and technological advancement of the world.

Dr. Abdulla Manjeri, the Director and Managing Director of the Festival said, “The Global Malayalee Festival is a celebration of Kerala’s culture, heritage, and global connections, offering opportunities for growth, networking, and unity. It blends tradition with modern opportunities, focusing on areas like trade and investment and celebration.”

This event brings together the worldwide Malayalee community to celebrate their rich traditions while fostering opportunities in trade, investment, and cultural exchange. With a diverse lineup of performances, workshops, and networking events, the festival aims to strengthen ties and showcase Kerala’s vibrant contributions to the world. Join us in Kerala for this unique cultural and economic convergence.

 

Founded with the objective of upholding and sharing the rich cultural values of Malayalees, the Global Festival envisions a cohesive community that not only embraces but actively perpetuates in the rich cultural traditions. “By nurturing our ties to cultural roots, we seek to instill a deep-seated sense of identity and belonging, preserving the ethnic, cultural, and social essence of the Malayalees and ensuring that aspects of this identity and unity remain eternal in spiritual and actual ways which should be vibrant in the future generations for global Malayalees,” said Pappachen.

GMF 2025 2

“The Green Alert” ~ An environmental awareness documentary

Dr. Mathew JoysEnvironment, Global 0
Dr. Mathew Joys, Las Vegas

 

At a time when global warming and climate change are challenging humanity’s survival, the teaser of the docu-fiction film The Green Alert, produced by Thampy Kurian Boston for the Kurian Foundation to raise environmental awareness on a global scale, has been released.

The teaser was screened at the 10th International Annual Media Conference of the Indo-American Press Club in Pennsylvania, USA.

This film is a unique visual experience, combining the possibilities of drama and cinema with complete technical excellence.

The shooting of the environmental awareness documentary film The Green Alert has begun at the Travancore Club in Thiruvalla.

The film was switched on by the Chief Whip of the State Government, Dr. N. Jayarajan. He reminded that the severe environmental setbacks are commendable. The ceremony began with a prayer by Rev. Shaji Thomas. He wished that this work of art for the good of the world would be the most successful one.

WhatsApp Image 2025 05 09 at 2 47 36 PM
Producer Thampy Kurian, Boston
This film will directly examine the setbacks that may occur until 2100. It will be made in ten languages , including Malayalam, English, and Hindi, and will be submitted to the UNO’s Environment Committee, other global environmental organizations, international film festivals, etc. The Thiruvalla Travancore Club provided the necessary facilities for the film’s production, and prominent actors and club members came as supporting actors.
Directed by K.C. Thulasi Das, scriptwriter and executive Good night producer and Prof. K.P. Mathew, Camera Johnny Assaygal, Associate Camera Gigi Iravankara, Chief Associate Establishment Prashanth Mollikkal, Associate Director Hiranyan Adoor, Assistant Directors Sanoop, Antony, Mejo K.J., Editor Johnson Thomas, Makeup Ratheesh Kodungallur, Costume Rose Mary, VFX Arun Babu, Art M.R.B, Music Sandeep Thulasidas, Sound Design Nithin Mollikkal, Still Photographer Aneek John Varghese, Coordinators Jacob Varghese, Shaji Pulikodan, Production Control John K. Varghese and others.The film is a direct look at the environmental disasters that await us, and is a green alert to undertake environmental protection activities. It also has the distinction of featuring over a hundred actors, including dupes of Al Gore, Attenborough, Vanessa Nakate, John Muir, Greta Thunberg, and Mahatma Gandhi, who have given direction to global environmental management.The film, which has been created after extensive research, will be made in various world languages.

The teaser was released at the tenth International Media Conference  held at Peconos, USA and was given special recognition for presenting a topic of global importance.

Kashmir Solidarity USA Condemns Pakistan-Sponsored Terrorism: Calls for Justice and Restoration of Kashmiri Hindu Heritage

Ajay GhoshGlobal, Nation 0

New York, USA – 4/22/25– Kashmir Solidarity USA, a multi-ethnic, multi-religious, and secular organization committed to countering terrorism and promoting peace, strongly condemns the ongoing terrorism sponsored by Pakistan against the people of Kashmir. For decades, cross-border terrorism has devastated the region, displacing over half a million Kashmiri Hindus and forcing them to live as refugees in their own country.

In a statement issued today, Surinder Zutshi, Founder and Chairman of Kashmir Solidarity USA, said, “We stand united in denouncing the barbaric acts of terror that have plagued Kashmir for far too long. It is unacceptable that more than 500,000 innocent civilians have been uprooted from their ancestral homes as a result of targeted violence. This is not only a humanitarian tragedy but also a grave injustice that must be addressed by the global community.”

The organization strongly condemns the heinous terrorist attack that occurred today in Pahalgam, where 26 innocent tourists lost their lives in one of the worst terror incidents in Jammu and Kashmir in recent times. Armed terrorists opened fire indiscriminately in the Baisaran Valley, leaving dozens dead or wounded. Mr. Zutshi condemned the attack as “a horrific and cowardly act of violence aimed at destabilizing the region and spreading fear among civilians.” He called on the international community to hold Pakistan accountable for its continued sponsorship of terrorism, stating, “The bloodshed must end. The world cannot turn a blind eye while state-backed terrorism continues to claim innocent lives.”

The organization also commended U.S. President Donald J. Trump for his firm stance against nations that harbor or support terrorism. “We salute President Trump for his unwavering commitment to protecting America from terrorist threats and for taking bold steps to ensure national and global security. His leadership has been instrumental in holding rogue regimes accountable,” Zutshi added.

Kashmir Solidarity USA is also urging Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to take decisive action to preserve the rich cultural and religious heritage of Kashmiri Hindus and to ensure their dignified return and rehabilitation. “We appeal to Prime Minister Modi to continue his efforts to restore the civilizational roots of Kashmir and to create conditions for the safe and honorable resettlement of displaced Kashmiri Pandits in the Valley,” the statement concluded.

Kashmir Solidarity USA remains committed to supporting victims of terrorism, promoting human rights, and fostering international solidarity for a peaceful and just resolution in Kashmir.

 Media Contact:

David Miller

southasianewswire@gmail.com
1301 K Street NW, Suite 200W

Washington, DC, 20005

Pope Francis, Global Spiritual Leader and Champion of the Poor, Dies at 88

Staff ReporterGlobal, Religion, Spirituality 0
Pope Francis, the first Jesuit and first Latin American pontiff in the nearly 2,000-year history of the Catholic Church, passed away at the age of 88 on Easter Monday, April 21, 2025, in his residence at the Vatican. The news was confirmed by Cardinal Kevin Farrell, the Camerlengo of the Holy Roman Church, who described the pontiff’s final moments as peaceful and surrounded by close aides and medical staff.
A Historic Papacy Comes to an End
Born Jorge Mario Bergoglio on December 17, 1936, in Buenos Aires, Argentina, Pope Francis ascended to the papacy on March 13, 2013, following the historic resignation of Pope Benedict XVI. He was the first non-European pope in over 1,200 years and brought a fresh, pastoral perspective to a Church long dominated by Eurocentric traditions. His election marked a significant moment of hope for the global South and for Catholics seeking reform, compassion, and inclusivity.
Known widely as the “People’s Pope,” Francis used his papacy to focus the Church’s attention on the marginalized — refugees, the poor, and victims of abuse — and to emphasize mercy over judgment. His leadership style was defined by humility: from choosing modest papal apartments over the opulent Apostolic Palace to embracing interfaith dialogue and environmental stewardship.
The Final Days
Pope Francis’s health had been a growing concern over the last year. He had suffered from chronic respiratory issues dating back to a lung infection in his youth. In early April 2025, he was diagnosed with double pneumonia. Despite his condition, he insisted on delivering a brief Easter Sunday blessing to a crowd of over 40,000 in St. Peter’s Square. It was to be his final public appearance.
The Vatican released an official statement at 8:15 a.m. Rome time, announcing his death: “His Holiness Pope Francis returned to the house of the Father at 7:35 a.m., Easter Monday, April 21, 2025. He passed peacefully in prayer, having lived his final days with grace and faith.”
A Legacy of Reform and Relevance
Over his 12-year tenure, Pope Francis made significant changes to the Church’s approach on global issues:
•Social Justice: He championed the rights of immigrants and called for humane responses to migration crises across Europe and the Americas.
•Environment: In 2015, his encyclical Laudato Si’ became a landmark document urging environmental action and responsible stewardship of the Earth.
•Church Reform: Francis cracked down on financial corruption within the Vatican and restructured various governing bodies to improve transparency.
•Inclusivity: While upholding traditional Church teachings, Francis softened the language toward divorced Catholics, the LGBTQ+ community, and those outside the Church, often stating, “Who am I to judge?”
Despite internal opposition, especially from conservative factions within the Church, Francis remained a unifying figure for the world’s 1.3 billion Catholics.
Global Mourning and Honors
Condolences and tributes have poured in from leaders and communities worldwide.
U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance, who visited the Pope earlier this month, called him “a spiritual beacon not only for Catholics but for all people of goodwill.” Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi described him as “a global statesman whose message of peace and compassion deeply touched India.” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen praised his “undaunted commitment to the poor and vulnerable.”
In a rare move, Italy’s Serie A football league postponed all seven scheduled matches for the day in mourning, highlighting the Pope’s influence far beyond the religious realm.
Funeral Arrangements and Papal Transition
Following tradition, Pope Francis’s body will lie in state in St. Peter’s Basilica for several days to allow faithful from around the world to pay their respects. The funeral is scheduled for Friday, April 25, and will be attended by global dignitaries, faith leaders, and millions of mourners.
In accordance with his personal wishes, Pope Francis will be buried at the Basilica of St. Mary Major in Rome, a place he visited frequently and held close to his heart. This marks the first time since 1903 that a pope will be buried outside Vatican grounds.
The College of Cardinals will convene in early May to begin the papal conclave. Currently, 135 cardinal electors under the age of 80 are eligible to vote. The conclave is expected to begin between May 6 and May 11, with the world watching closely to see who will carry forward Francis’s legacy.
A Pope for the Times
Pope Francis leaves behind a Church that is more engaged with the modern world, more attentive to the voices on the margins, and more transparent in its governance. While his papacy was not without controversy, particularly on issues such as gender roles and clergy abuse, his legacy is one of transformation, compassion, and moral courage.
As Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican Secretary of State, remarked: “He brought Christ closer to the people, and the people closer to Christ. In life and in death, he remained a shepherd to the very end.”
The world mourns the loss of a spiritual leader, reformer, and symbol of unity in a divided age.

Guru Nanak Prize 2024 Will be Awarded to Global Champions of Interfaith Unity

Ajay GhoshReligion, Global 0

Oxford Scholar and World’s Largest Grassroots Faith Network Chosen to Receive Hofstra University’s Prestigious Award  for Promoting Peace Through Dialogue

HEMPSTEAD, NY – Hofstra University, in partnership with the Sardarni Kuljit Kaur Bindra Charitable Foundation, has chosen to award the 2024 Guru Nanak Interfaith Prize to two visionaries: Dr. Thea Gomelauri, founder of the Oxford Interfaith Forum, and the United Religions Initiative (URI), founded by pioneering interfaith leader and president emeritus Rt. Rev. William E. Swing.

The biennial prize–$50,000 split between the two winners–recognizes extraordinary contributions to promoting peaceful dialogue between faiths and cultures. The ceremony will take place April 22, 2025, at the Crest Hollow Country Club in Woodbury, NY.

“It was our parents desire to bring better understanding among people of various faiths and founded Interfaith Prize in collaboration with Hofstra University to promote interfaith dialogue and to recognize individuals or organizations that bring people together. It is named after Guru Nanak who preached and practiced equality of all human beings irrespective of their religion, caste, color, creed or sex. We are very pleased with the selection of two very well deserving awardees for 2024 Guru Nanak Interfaith Prize” said T J Bindra of Bindra Family.

Bindra Portrait

“The Guru Nanak Prize embodies Hofstra University’s mission to foster global understanding while preparing students to thrive in the complexity of our interconnected world,” said Dr. Eva Badowska, dean of Hofstra College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. “At a time when peaceful collaboration, civil discourse, and cultural awareness are essential to addressing profound global challenges, this prize honors the principles of peace, interfaith dialogue, and selfless service that resonate deeply with the University’s values. It reminds us that education is not just about knowledge – it’s about inspiring action and shaping a better future for all.”

From the Halls of Academia to the Grassroots: Two Leaders, One Vision

Dr. Thea Gomelauri, a biblical scholar at the University of Oxford and director of the Oxford Interfaith Forum, has brought together academics across the globe to explore sacred texts and religious traditions through an inclusive lens.

Her groundbreaking research on Georgian Jewry–the world’s oldest surviving Jewish diaspora–has helped shed light on forgotten communities and manuscripts, earning her international acclaim.

Option 2 Thea Gomelauri

“This prestigious award in the name of Guru Nanak Dev Ji inspires us to continue the promotion of universal peace through interreligious education at this critical time in our history,” Dr. Gomelauri said.

The Forum was recently honored by King Abdullah II of Jordan with the UN World Interfaith Harmony Week Award for its contributions to peace and religious education.

The United Religions Initiative, meanwhile, stands as the largest grassroots interfaith network in the world, spanning more than 100 countries. Born out of a bold vision by Bishop William E. Swing during a 1993 interfaith service at the United Nations, URI now mobilizes everyday people–from youth activists to elders–to build peace in their own communities.

“The generous heart of Guru Nanak was powerful in his time, and through this award the spiritual power only increases,” said Bishop Swing. “To be honored in his name is an inward blessing.”

URI’s work ranges from conflict resolution to environmental sustainabilitytoadvocacy for human rights, impacting communities on every continent across the globe.

“We feel proud and grateful for this honor which celebrates URI, its founder, and the entire URI network of interfaith activists who dedicate their lives to a world where we can all live in trust, love and unity, beyond and through our necessary and lauded differences,” said Eric Roux, chair of the URI Global Council.

Honoring a Legacy of Peace

Founded in 2006 by Sardar Isha Singh Bindra and family. The Guru Nanak Interfaith Prize celebrates the legacy of Guru Nanak, the 15th-century founder of Sikhism, who championed equality, service, and unity across faiths. Past recipients include His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama and Dr. Eboo Patel, founder of Interfaith America.

 

Dr. Julie Byrne, Hofstra University’s Monsignor Thomas Hartman Chair in Catholic Studies and chair of the Department of Religion, said of this year’s honorees, “The committee was deeply impressed by the complementary work done by these two stellar interfaith organizations: the United Religions Initiative that concentrates on grassroots networks of communities, and the Oxford Interfaith Forum that brings together scholars for the sharing and production of new knowledge about religions and their interactions. Community-based and scholarly approaches are both needed to advance understanding and acknowledgment of difference in today’s global world.”

Trump’s Executive Orders and the Shift Toward Autocratic Rule

Staff ReporterNation, Global 0

Over the past month, concerns have grown that former President Donald Trump is seeking to consolidate power in a way that resembles a monarchy or dictatorship. While his supporters dismiss such claims as exaggerated, recent developments indicate otherwise.

Beyond Trump’s own statements hinting at monarchical aspirations, his latest executive orders—particularly one that aims to dismantle the independence of federal agencies—along with the actions of Justice Department officials, signify a major step toward authoritarian rule.

A dictatorship, like absolute monarchy, is defined by the idea that law—its creation, interpretation, and enforcement—stems solely from the will of one individual. King James I of England expressed this notion in his 1598 work The True Law of Free Monarchies, where he wrote that kings existed:

“before any estates or ranks of men, before any parliaments were holden, or laws made, and by them was the land distributed, which at first was wholly theirs. And so it follows of necessity that kings were the authors and makers of the laws, and not the laws of the kings.”

Acting on this philosophy, James ruled without Parliament for extended periods, granted legal exemptions to allies, and governed through special courts that ruled according to his will. His son, Charles I, took this belief in absolute sovereignty even further, sparking a civil war that ended with his execution in 1649 and Oliver Cromwell’s rise to power.

Following the monarchy’s restoration in 1660, British rulers conceded that statutory law could only be established through collaboration between the crown and Parliament. They also acknowledged that laws applied to the monarch’s actions and that judges, rather than the king, were responsible for legal interpretation.

The next major constitutional shift occurred in 1688 when King James II was deposed and replaced by his daughter Mary and her husband, William of Orange. To secure the throne, they had to accept the English Bill of Rights, which abolished the monarch’s power to nullify statutory law, either broadly or for individuals. Parliament also revised the coronation oath to require monarchs to govern according to laws enacted by Parliament and the established legal traditions of the realm. By the time of the American Revolution in 1776, even King George III—whom the American colonies viewed as tyrannical—was bound by the rule of law.

The founders of the United States sought both democratic governance and the rule of law, fearing that unchecked democracy could allow a demagogue to manipulate the public and seize absolute power. To prevent this, they designed a system with separate branches of government, ensuring that lawmaking and judicial interpretation remained outside the president’s sole control. They also borrowed from Britain’s constitutional system by requiring the president to swear an oath to uphold the Constitution:

“I do solemnly swear … that I will … to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

The founders’ fears of dictatorship were validated shortly after the Constitution’s adoption. In 1799, a Corsican officer named Napoleon Bonaparte overthrew the post-Revolution French government, first declaring himself “First Consul” and later assuming the title of Emperor. Trump’s recent reference to Napoleon’s alleged claim that “he who saves his Country does not violate any Law” echoes the mindset of a leader our founders despised. As Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1815, Napoleon was a “Usurper” and “Autocrat” driven by a “tyrannical soul” and a “ravenous thirst for human blood.”

While the end of European monarchies after World War I might have seemed like a victory for democracy, it instead gave rise to modern non-hereditary dictatorships, with Adolf Hitler’s regime as the most infamous example. The Nazi doctrine of Führerprinzip (leader principle) placed Hitler above all legal authority, rendering him the ultimate arbiter of law and policy. Dissenters faced dismissal, financial ruin, imprisonment, torture, or execution.

An American dictator would exhibit similar characteristics—proclaiming himself above the law, acting without legal constraints, and targeting those who uphold legal principles.

This brings us to Trump’s recent executive order on independent agencies. In the 20th century, Congress recognized its limitations in crafting highly technical legislation and increasingly delegated regulatory authority to executive agencies. These agencies create regulations following strict procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Additionally, the judicial system lacked sufficient expertise and manpower to handle all regulatory disputes, leading to the creation of administrative law judges within federal agencies. This resulted in a system where law is developed and interpreted not just by Congress and the courts, but also by specialized executive officials.

Some of these regulatory agencies operate within Cabinet departments, whose heads are appointed and removed by the president. However, Congress deemed that certain agencies should function with greater independence. Institutions like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) were established as “independent agencies,” meaning their leaders could only be removed under specific circumstances.

On Tuesday, Trump issued an executive order seeking to eliminate this independence.

First, the order attempts to revoke the autonomy of congressionally established agencies, subjecting their leadership to performance standards determined by the White House Office of Management and Budget. This blatant power grab directly contradicts Supreme Court precedent.

Second, it reinforces Trump’s previous claim that he can disregard Congress’ directives on how appropriated funds should be spent. The ease with which he asserts this suggests he is confident that Republican lawmakers will not challenge his usurpation of Congress’ constitutional authority over federal spending, implying that the legislative branch has already submitted to his will.

Beyond independent agencies, the order asserts that the president and attorney general hold the final authority in interpreting all laws. It states:

“No employee of the executive branch acting in their official capacity may advance an interpretation of the law as the position of the United States that contravenes the President or the Attorney General’s opinion on a matter of law, including but not limited to the issuance of regulations, guidance, and positions advanced in litigation, unless authorized to do so by the President or in writing by the Attorney General.”

In essence, Trump is declaring that he alone determines how laws should be written, interpreted, and enforced.

For instance, if Trump decides that SEC regulations do not apply to Elon Musk, then no SEC commissioner may challenge this stance.

If he declares that procedural protections for immigrants outlined in the Immigration and Nationality Act are invalid, then no Homeland Security official or immigration judge can argue otherwise.

If he determines that regulations on oil and gas industries should be loosened to benefit campaign donors, then his ruling is final.

Perhaps most alarmingly, if Trump asserts that the FBI and Justice Department may launch criminal investigations against his political opponents without factual basis, then that, too, is an “authoritative interpretation of law.” The recent forced resignations of multiple Justice Department prosecutors in New York and Washington, D.C., demonstrate that those who oppose such actions will be dismissed, branded as disloyal, and possibly investigated themselves.

While some may dismiss Trump’s social media posts featuring Napoleonic quotes or images of him wearing a crown as mere theatrics, his executive orders and the actions of his Justice Department paint a far more serious picture. Having already neutralized congressional opposition, Trump has now proclaimed that his will is the supreme legal authority within the executive branch. Those who resist will be removed.

This is not just an assertion of presidential power—it is the adoption of Führerprinzip, a system where dissent is crushed, the law is whatever the leader declares, and government officials serve only at his pleasure.

New Paper | ASEAN Caught Between China’s Export Surge and Global De-Risking

Staff ReporterEconomy, Global 0

Thursday, February 20, 2025 – Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI) has published “ASEAN Caught Between China’s Export Surge and Global De-Risking,” written by Brendan Kelly, Fellow on Chinese Economy and Technology at ASPI’s Center for China Analysis, and Shay Wester, ASPI’s Director of Asian Economic Affairs. The paper examines how China’s industrial overcapacity is impacting ASEAN economies across key sectors, analyzes responses by ASEAN countries and China, and offers policy recommendations to Washington and ASEAN governments.

“ASEAN overtook the United States and the European Union as China’s largest export market in 2023, with Chinese exports to the region increasing by an additional 12% in 2024, while ASEAN exports to China rose by only 2%,” write Kelly and Wester. “This influx of Chinese goods, including intermediate goods for re-export and consumer goods for ASEAN markets, has widened trade deficits and intensified pressures on local industries.”

Alongside surging imports from China, Kelly and Wester identify three other trends impacting ASEAN economies:

  1. China’s industrial overcapacity is displacing ASEAN exports to third markets.
  2. ASEAN is increasingly becoming the key offshore manufacturing base for Chinese companies, particularly in the clean energy sector.
  3. The U.S., EU, and other economies like Japan and India are intensifying their scrutiny of exports from Chinese companies operating in or processed through third countries.

“ASEAN governments now face a double balancing act: managing growing economic integration with China while contending with mounting pressures from advanced economies to reduce reliance on Chinese supply chains,” write Kelly and Wester. “These pressures ASEAN faces are already building and are likely to be shaped and accelerated under the new Trump administration and China’s decoupling efforts.”

To address these mounting challenges, the authors suggest that ASEAN must strengthen trade tools, enhance regional coordination to manage import surges, invest in their own competitiveness, and diversify supply chains away from China. The paper also provides recommendations for U.S. engagement with ASEAN.

Read the paper here. Members of the media interested in interviewing Kelly and Wester should email pr@asiasociety.org.

Don’t miss ASPI’s upcoming events online and in New York:

Changing Geopolitics of China and Russia in the Arctic

Tuesday, 25 February 2025
8 – 10:30 a.m. EST

New York

The China-Russia Program at the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center of China Analysis (CCA) is convening a panel to discuss the evolving dynamics of cooperation and competition between China and Russia in the Arctic. The panel will feature Jo Inge Bekkevold, Senior China Fellow at the Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies/Norwegian Defence University College; Katarzyna Zysk, Professor of International Relations and Contemporary History at the Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies; and Elizabeth Wishnick, Senior Research Scientist in the China and Indo-Pacific Security Affairs Division at the Center for Naval Analyses and Senior Research Scholar at the Weatherhead East Asian Institute at Columbia University. The discussion will be moderated by Lyle J. Morris, CCA Senior Fellow on Foreign Policy and National Security.

That’s What (Economic) Friends Are For: Working with Indo-Pacific Partners to Enhance Supply Chain Resilience

Tuesday, 4 March 2025
8 – 9 a.m. EST

Online

We invite you to join a virtual panel discussion with experts from the Indo-Pacific and the U.S. to explore the impact of US friendshoring policy. The panel will feature: Iman Pambagyo, former Chief Trade Negotiator for Indonesia; Jayant Menon, Senior Fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS) -Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore; Yasuyuki Todo, Professor at the Graduate School of Economics at Waseda University; and Wendy Cutler, Vice President of Asia Society Policy Institute. Jane Mellsop, ASPI Director of Trade, Investment, and Economic Security, will moderate.

The Two Sessions: What Will China Do on Stimulus, Trade Wars, and Tech Competition?

Thursday, 6 March 2025
9 – 10 a.m. EST

Online

Join us for a panel discussion on what China’s government work report delivered by Xi Jinping on March 5 can tell us about what to expect from China in the year ahead. To analyze these developments, ASPI CCA is pleased to present a next-day webinar with CCA Fellows Michael Hirson, Lizzi C. Lee, and Senior Fellow Guoguang Wu, moderated by Fellow Neil Thomas.

Members of the media interested in attending any of our in person events should contact pr@asiasociety.org.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: UK Electronic Travel Authorization (ETA) Required for US/Canada Passengers

Staff ReporterGlobal, Travel 0

Dear Budget Tours and Travel Customers,

This is an important update regarding new entry requirements for the United Kingdom (UK).

Starting January 8, 2025, all travelers from the USA and Canada, including those transiting through London, will need an Electronic Travel Authorization (ETA) to enter the UK. This applies to all travel purposes, including tourism, visiting family and friends, and business.

Here’s what you need to know:

Applications open: ETA applications are now open for US and Canadian citizens. You can apply online starting November 27, 2024.
Everyone needs an ETA: This requirement applies to all travelers, including infants and children.
Validity: Once approved, your ETA is electronically linked to your passport and is valid for multiple entries over a period of two years.
New passport? New ETA: If you get a new passport, you’ll need to apply for a new ETA.
How to apply:

For complete information and to apply for your ETA, please visit: www.gov.uk/electronic-travel-authorisation

Important reminder:

Please ensure all your passengers traveling to the UK are aware of this new requirement and obtain their ETA well in advance of their trip to avoid any travel disruptions.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,
Team Budget Tours and Travel Bureau.

US calls for text-based negotiations for UNSC reform; backs India, Japan and Germany for permanent seat

ARUL LOUISDiplomacy, Global 0

India and several countries have been pushing for the adoption of the negotiating text and the the US adding its weight gives it added impetus.

While reaffirming support for permanent seats for India, Japan and Germany,  the United States called text-based negotiations for reform of the United Nations Security Council giving an impetus to the stalled process, according to Permanent Representative Linda Thomas-Greenfield,

“The United States supports engaging in text-based negotiations on Council reform”, she said on Thursday. “It’s actually a big deal. It means we’re ready to work with other countries to negotiate language, prepare amendments, and ready this resolution for a vote in the General Assembly, and ultimately amend the UN Charter”.

She reaffirmed the US position backing permanent Council seats for India, Japan, and Germany.

The Council reform process known as Inter-Governmental Negotiations (IGN) has been effectively blocked by a small group of countries that oppose the adoption of a negotiating text.

Without such a document to create an agenda and the basis for negotiations, the discussions have been locked in a circular pattern since they began in 2009, going back to the starting point every year.

India and several countries have been pushing for the adoption of the negotiating text and the the US adding its weight gives it added impetus.

A senior administration official, who had earlier briefed reporters, said that it was hoped that with Thomas-Greenfield’s announcement “we will help jump start this process in a number of ways by calling for text-based negotiations at the earliest possible opportunities”.

The focus of her speech at the Council on Foreign Relations was on giving two permanent seats to Africa, the continent of 1.5 billion people spread across 55 countries and where about half the Council-mandated peacekeeping operations are located.

“It’s what our African partners seek, and we believe, this is what it’s what is just”, she said.

“There are currently three non-permanent seats on the Security Council allocated to African countries on a rotating basis, for two years”, she said. “The problem is, these elected seats don’t enable African countries to deliver the full benefit of their knowledge and voices to the work of the Council”

African nations have demanded two permanent seats on the Council and the addition of two elected seats.

Their demand is now resonating at the UN with added intensity as it looks to the 80th anniversary of its founding next year.

The UN’s structures that were created in the aftermath of World War II with some changes in 1965 do not reflect today’s world where the UN has 193 members, Thomas-Greenfield said.

“The world is asking big questions about the United Nations. Whether this institution is representative and legitimate. Whether it’s built to meet the challenges of the day, as well as the challenges of the future”.

“And in particular, Member States are looking at the Security Council” she added.

Thomas-Greenfield said Washington proposes giving a non-permanent seat to landlocked developing countries.

The US also backs a permanent seat for Latin America and the Caribbean, she said, but did not endorse Brazil, which has also staked a claim.

The official who briefed reporters said that the US opposes giving the new permanent members veto rights.

The group blocking the adoption of a negotiating text is the 12-member Uniting for Consensus (UfC) led by Italy and includes Pakistan which opposes the addition of permanent members.

UfC maintains that there should be a consensus before there can be negotiating text, locking the process in a Catch-22 situation because without negotiations that require a text there can’t be a consensus.

Jaishankar Declares End to Uninterrupted Dialogue with Pakistan; Discusses India’s Foreign Policy on Afghanistan and Bangladesh

Staff ReporterDiplomacy, Global 0

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar recently declared that the era of continuous dialogue with Pakistan has come to an end. Speaking at the launch of Ambassador Rajiv Sikri’s book, “Strategic Conundrums: Reshaping India’s Foreign Policy,” in Delhi on Friday, Jaishankar emphasized the need for a new approach to relations with Pakistan. He stated, “Actions have consequences. So far as Jammu and Kashmir is concerned, Article 370 is done.”

The Minister further elaborated on the future of India-Pakistan relations, suggesting that the nature of the relationship moving forward would depend on how events unfold. He remarked, “So, the issue is what kind of relationship we can contemplate with Pakistan…What I do want to say is that we are not passive, and whether events take a positive or a negative direction, either way, we will react.”

Jaishankar’s statements reflect a clear departure from the traditional stance of maintaining uninterrupted dialogue with Pakistan, signaling a tougher stance by India. The emphasis on actions having consequences points to India’s firm position on not engaging with Pakistan unless there is a significant shift in its approach towards cross-border terrorism and other contentious issues.

Moving to Afghanistan, Jaishankar expressed India’s nuanced understanding of the evolving situation there. As reported by ANI, he highlighted the strong cultural and social ties between India and Afghanistan, despite the challenging political landscape. “Today after reviewing our Afghan policy, we are very clear-eyed about our interests…We are not confused by inherited wisdom that is before us,” he stated. He further added, “We must appreciate that Afghanistan with the presence of America is very different than Afghanistan without the presence of America.” These comments underline India’s pragmatic approach to its Afghan policy, acknowledging the significant changes in Afghanistan’s political dynamics following the withdrawal of American troops.

Jaishankar’s remarks suggest that India is carefully evaluating its options in Afghanistan, mindful of both regional stability and its strategic interests. The minister emphasized the importance of understanding the implications of America’s withdrawal and how it affects the broader geopolitical environment in the region.

On the subject of Bangladesh, Jaishankar acknowledged the importance of engaging with the current government while recognizing the potential for political disruptions. He said, “It is natural we will deal with the government of the day. We have to recognize that there have been political changes and they can be disruptive.” He further noted the necessity of seeking mutual interests in the bilateral relationship, stating, “Clearly, here we have to look for mutuality of interest…”

The External Affairs Minister’s comments on Bangladesh reflect a pragmatic and strategic approach, focusing on maintaining good relations while being prepared for potential political changes. This stance is consistent with India’s broader foreign policy strategy of engaging with neighboring countries based on mutual interests and shared goals.

Jaishankar’s statements at the book launch provide insight into India’s evolving foreign policy strategy. The minister’s remarks on Pakistan underscore a more assertive stance, signaling that India will not return to a policy of uninterrupted dialogue without a significant change in Pakistan’s behavior. On Afghanistan, his comments reflect a clear-eyed approach to a complex situation, recognizing the significant changes following the U.S. withdrawal and the need to prioritize India’s interests in the region. Finally, his observations on Bangladesh highlight a balanced approach, focusing on engaging with the current government while being mindful of potential political disruptions.

The overarching theme of Jaishankar’s remarks suggests a shift towards a more assertive and pragmatic foreign policy stance by India. By prioritizing actions over rhetoric, and emphasizing the need for mutual interests and stability, India is positioning itself as a key player in the regional and global geopolitical landscape.

Healthcare Inequalities, Racial Disparities, Access To Care, Social Determinants, Structural Inequities

Staff ReporterDiplomacy, Global 0

Palm Beach, FL – June 22, 2024 – TheUNN Corporation, a leader in global publishing and media, has announced its latest milestone: a joint publication agreement to publish Ambassador SD Muni’s best-selling book, “Dabbling in Diplomacy: Authorised & Otherwise.” This agreement, in collaboration with Konark Publishers Pvt. Ltd., marks a significant step in TheUNN Corporation’s mission to bring influential and insightful works to a worldwide audience. The book is now available for purchase on Amazon globally.

Ambassador SD Muni, a renowned expert in South Asian politics and international relations, offers readers an unparalleled glimpse into the world of diplomacy. His memoir, “Dabbling in Diplomacy: Authorised & Otherwise” provides an insider’s perspective on critical political developments in South Asia, including Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, and Laos. The book combines Prof. Muni’s extensive academic knowledge with his personal experiences, making it a compelling read for scholars, policymakers, and anyone interested in international affairs.

“We are thrilled to collaborate with Ambassador SD Muni on this exceptional publication,” said Dr. Joseph M. Chalil, Publisher of Universal News Network and TheUNN.com, and Chairman of Indo-American Press Club. “Ambassador Muni’s insights and firsthand accounts offer a unique and valuable perspective on diplomacy and regional politics. This joint publication agreement aligns perfectly with our commitment to fostering a deeper understanding of global issues through high-quality content.”

TheUNN Corporation’s partnership with Konark Publishers Pvt. Ltd. and Ambassador Muni highlights its dedication to supporting and disseminating works that contribute to the global discourse on diplomacy and international relations. By making “Dabbling in Diplomacy” available on Amazon worldwide, TheUNN Corporation ensures that this important work reaches a broad and diverse audience.

KPR Nair, Managing Director of Konark Publishers Pvt. Ltd., expressed his enthusiasm about the collaboration: “Working with TheUNN Corporation and Ambassador SD Muni has been a rewarding experience. This book is a testament to Ambassador Muni’s profound understanding of South Asian politics and his ability to convey complex diplomatic narratives in an engaging manner. We are proud to be part of this joint effort to bring his valuable insights to a global readership.”

Ambassador Muni’s memoir has already garnered significant attention and praise from experts and readers alike. The book’s detailed recounting of pivotal moments in South Asian history and its exploration of the human aspects of diplomacy have resonated with audiences, making it a best-seller in its category.

 

In “Dabbling in Diplomacy,” Ambassador Muni shares engaging anecdotes and profound insights from his interactions with senior leaders in South Asia. His tenure as India’s Special Envoy to Southeast Asian countries on UNSC Reforms and as Ambassador to the Lao People’s Democratic Republic enriches the narrative, providing readers with a comprehensive understanding of the geopolitical landscape.

 

TheUNN Corporation invites readers worldwide to explore Ambassador SD Muni’s “Dabbling in Diplomacy: Authorised & Otherwise.” The book is now available for purchase on Amazon in both digital and print formats. This collaboration not only underscores TheUNN Corporation’s commitment to excellence in publishing but also its dedication to promoting knowledge and understanding of international relations. For more information about TheUNN Corporation and its latest publications, please visit TheUNN.com.

 

About TheUNN Corporation:

TheUNN Corporation is a global leader in publishing and media, dedicated to delivering high-quality content that informs, educates, and inspires. With a diverse portfolio of publications and media offerings, TheUNN Corporation strives to foster a deeper understanding of global issues and promote informed discourse across a wide range of topics.

TheUNN Corporation Announces Joint Publication Agreement for Ambassador SD Muni’s Best-Selling New Book

Ajay GhoshDiplomacy, Global 2

Palm Beach, FL – June 22, 2024 – TheUNN Corporation, a leader in global publishing and media, has announced its latest milestone: a joint publication agreement to publish Ambassador SD Muni’s best-selling book, “Dabbling in Diplomacy: Authorised & Otherwise.” This agreement, in collaboration with Konark Publishers Pvt. Ltd., marks a significant step in TheUNN Corporation’s mission to bring influential and insightful works to a worldwide audience. The book is now available for purchase on Amazon globally.

Chalil and KPRAmbassador S.D Muni, a renowned expert in South Asian politics and international relations, offers readers an unparalleled glimpse into the world of diplomacy. His memoir, “Dabbling in Diplomacy: Authorised & Otherwise” provides an insider’s perspective on critical political developments in South Asia, including Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, and Laos. The book combines Prof. Muni’s extensive academic knowledge with his personal experiences, making it a compelling read for scholars, policymakers, and anyone interested in international affairs.

“We are thrilled to collaborate with Ambassador SD Muni on this exceptional publication,” said Dr. Joseph M. Chalil, Publisher of Universal News Network and TheUNN.com, and Chairman of Indo-American Press Club. “Ambassador Muni’s insights and firsthand accounts offer a unique and valuable perspective on diplomacy and regional politics. This joint publication agreement aligns perfectly with our commitment to fostering a deeper understanding of global issues through high-quality content.”

TheUNN Corporation’s partnership with Konark Publishers Pvt. Ltd. and Ambassador Muni highlights its dedication to supporting and disseminating works that contribute to the global discourse on diplomacy and international relations. By making “Dabbling in Diplomacy” available on Amazon worldwide, TheUNN Corporation ensures that this important work reaches a broad and diverse audience.

KPR Nair, Managing Director of Konark Publishers Pvt. Ltd., expressed his enthusiasm about the collaboration: “Working with TheUNN Corporation and Ambassador SD Muni has been a rewarding experience. This book is a testament to Ambassador Muni’s profound understanding of South Asian politics and his ability to convey complex diplomatic narratives in an engaging manner. We are proud to be part of this joint effort to bring his valuable insights to a global readership.”

Ambassador Muni’s memoir has already garnered significant attention and praise from experts and readers alike. The book’s detailed recounting of pivotal moments in South Asian history and its exploration of the human aspects of diplomacy have resonated with audiences, making it a best-seller in its category.

In “Dabbling in Diplomacy,” Ambassador Muni shares engaging anecdotes and profound insights from his interactions with senior leaders in South Asia. His tenure as India’s Special Envoy to Southeast Asian countries on UNSC Reforms and as Ambassador to the Lao People’s Democratic Republic enriches the narrative, providing readers with a comprehensive understanding of the geopolitical landscape.

TheUNN Corporation invites readers worldwide to explore Ambassador SD Muni’s “Dabbling in Diplomacy: Authorised & Otherwise.” The book is now available for purchase on Amazon in both digital and print formats. This collaboration not only underscores TheUNN Corporation’s commitment to excellence in publishing but also its dedication to promoting knowledge and understanding of international relations. For more information about TheUNN Corporation and its latest publications, please visit TheUNN.com.

About TheUNN Corporation:

TheUNN Corporation is a global leader in publishing and media, dedicated to delivering high-quality content that informs, educates, and inspires. With a diverse portfolio of publications and media offerings, TheUNN Corporation strives to foster a deeper understanding of global issues and promote informed discourse across a wide range of topics.

Media Contact:

TheUNN Corporation

Email: info@theunn.com

Website: TheUNN.com

Dabbling in Diplomacy AuthorisedDiplomacy Liberated Konark UNN front for PODIndia Beyond The PandemicBeyond the COVID-19 Pandemic

Biden Unveils Israeli-Led Peace Plan: Roadmap to Ceasefire and Hostage Release

Staff ReporterDiplomacy, Global 0

President Biden has unveiled a pivotal Israeli-led initiative aimed at ending the ongoing conflict and securing the release of all remaining hostages held since October 7. The proposal outlines a three-stage roadmap, marking a significant step towards potential resolution between Israel and Hamas.

In a press briefing, President Biden emphasized the extensive diplomatic efforts undertaken by his team, including numerous discussions with leaders from Israel, Qatar, Egypt, and other regional stakeholders. He described Israel’s comprehensive proposal as a pathway to a sustainable ceasefire and the liberation of all captives. Although the proposal has been relayed to Hamas through Qatar, formal acceptance from the Gaza-based organization is pending.

“This is truly a decisive moment,” remarked President Biden, urging Hamas to seize the opportunity for peace by endorsing the deal. He also called upon the Israeli populace to support the initiative, highlighting the significant blows dealt to Hamas during the conflict, rendering a recurrence of October 7 unlikely.

Acknowledging potential dissent within Israel, particularly from factions advocating for prolonged military engagement, President Biden cautioned against perpetuating the war indefinitely. He stressed the imperative of prioritizing the release of hostages and embracing the proposed ceasefire as a means to avert further bloodshed.

Senior administration officials elaborated on the proposal’s phased approach, spanning approximately six weeks for each stage. Phase one entails a ceasefire period coupled with humanitarian efforts to alleviate the plight of Gazans, including infrastructure rehabilitation and provision of essential services.

The subsequent phase focuses on the release of remaining hostages and the permanent cessation of hostilities, accompanied by the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza’s populated areas. Negotiations will be pivotal in navigating the transition to this stage, with provisions in place to extend the ceasefire if required.

Phase three envisions a comprehensive reconstruction program spanning three to five years, supported by the U.S. and the international community. This initiative aims to address the long-term stabilization and rehabilitation of Gaza.

The proposal’s announcement follows previous ceasefire negotiations that ended without a resolution. Concurrently, Israeli military operations persist in certain areas, prompting concerns about civilian casualties and the escalation of violence.

President Biden emphasized his enduring commitment to Israel and underscored the urgency of seizing the current opportunity for peace. He reiterated his longstanding advocacy for a two-state solution and expressed optimism that the proposed roadmap could pave the way for such a resolution in the future.

Microsoft Unveils Groundbreaking AI Advancements at Build 2024 Conference, Empowering Global Innovation

Staff ReporterGlobal, Technology 0

At the recent Build 2024 conference hosted by Microsoft, CEO Satya Nadella commenced the keynote by recounting a compelling narrative about how technology had empowered an Indian farmer. This story marked the beginning of a series of exciting advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), including updates to Azure and Copilot, as well as groundbreaking innovations from collaborators like OpenAI.

Nadella shared, “In January 2023, I met a rural Indian farmer who used GPT-3.5, in his own voice, to understand government farm subsidies he’d heard about on television. It was a powerful moment for me. It illustrated the incredible impact of a cutting-edge model developed on the West Coast of the United States, now being used to directly improve the life of a rural farmer in India.”

During the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting at Davos in January, Nadella discussed the case of the Indian farmer with Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF).

Nadella recounted how the farmer sought assistance with accessing a government program, stating, “He expressed a complex need in one of the local languages. This got translated and interpreted by a bot and a response came back saying go to a portal and here is how you will access the programme.”

Furthermore, Nadella revealed that the farmer initially hesitated to engage with the program and requested the bot to handle it on his behalf. “And, it completed it and the reason why it was able to complete it was that the developer building it had taken GPT [General Purpose Technology] and trained it over all of the government of India documents and then scaffolded it with the speech recognition software,” Nadella added.

The Build 2024 conference showcased two significant announcements from Microsoft in the realm of AI. Firstly, developers can now utilize OpenAI’s most advanced model, GPT-40, offering revolutionary AI capabilities. Secondly, Microsoft introduced Phi-3-Vision, a novel Small Language Model (SLM) capable of comprehending and analyzing images with exceptional proficiency.

These pioneering tools will be accessible through Microsoft’s Azure AI Studio, providing developers with a centralized platform to harness these advancements and explore the frontiers of AI.

Microsoft’s endeavors didn’t conclude there. They also unveiled robust new virtual machines tailored for efficiently managing AI workloads. Notably, they emerged as the inaugural cloud provider to integrate AMD’s state-of-the-art MI300X AI accelerator chip. This integration enhances the Azure ND MI300X v5 virtual machine series, positioning it as a formidable entity for executing intricate AI tasks.

Shifting Economic Powerhouses: U.S. Resilience, China’s Rise, and Japan’s Decline from 1980 to 2024

Staff ReporterEconomy, Global 0

Over the decades, the distribution of global GDP among the world’s largest economies has experienced dynamic shifts, reflecting changes in economic policies, technological advancements, and demographic trends.

To illustrate these changes, we visualized the world’s top six economies by their share of global GDP from 1980 to 2024.

U.S. Resilience

The United States’ share of global GDP has shown significant fluctuations over time. After reaching a low point of 21.1% in 2011, the U.S. economy rebounded, increasing its share by several percentage points. The IMF estimates that by 2024, the U.S. will account for 26.3% of global GDP.

This trend indicates that the U.S. has managed a robust recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, as evidenced by its rising share of global GDP since 2020. In contrast, China, the EU, and Japan have seen their relative shares decline during the same period.

China’s Incredible Rise

The chart highlights China’s period of rapid economic growth, which began in the early 2000s. A significant milestone was China joining the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, which facilitated its integration into the global economy.

Japan Falls From the #2 Spot

Japan was once the world’s second-largest economy after the U.S., accounting for 17.8% of the global economy in 1994 and 1995. However, economic stagnation and an aging population have led to a relative decline in Japan’s economic influence.

-+=