FIFA has released its evaluation report for Saudi Arabia’s bid to host the men’s World Cup in 2034, setting the stage for the kingdom to be formally announced as the host at a FIFA Congress on December 11. The unopposed bid has been awarded an average score of 4.2 out of 5, the highest ever recorded for a World Cup bid, despite significant criticism over Saudi Arabia’s human rights record.
The evaluation highlights Saudi Arabia’s promise to meet FIFA’s hosting requirements, addressing areas such as human rights and sustainability, while acknowledging potential challenges. FIFA described the human rights risks as “medium,” yet emphasized the tournament’s potential as a “catalyst for reforms.” This sentiment was echoed by Saudi sports minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Turki Al Faisal, who stated, “This score by FIFA simply reflects our commitment to grow the game, our rapid transformation, and our desire to host the best possible tournament for the entire world to enjoy.”
Despite these assurances, campaign groups and human rights organizations have strongly criticized FIFA’s evaluation. Amnesty International labeled the report “an astonishing whitewash of the country’s atrocious human rights record,” warning of potential exploitation and repression. Similarly, Fair Square, another campaign group, accused FIFA of reaching new lows in its decision-making process.
Sustainability and Climate Concerns
FIFA’s report assessed Saudi Arabia’s sustainability plans as “low risk” for environmental protection, praising the bid’s “good overall commitment to sustainability.” The evaluation acknowledged Saudi Arabia’s significant construction plans, with eight new stadiums proposed among the 15 venues across five host cities. However, FIFA noted that the bid included measures to mitigate environmental impacts, such as using existing infrastructure where possible and offering free public transportation for ticket holders.
The kingdom’s hot climate poses logistical challenges, with summer temperatures exceeding 40°C. FIFA described the event timing as an “elevated risk,” and the bid did not specify a proposed schedule. Saudi Arabia has pledged to collaborate with FIFA to determine the optimal timing, likely following the precedent set by Qatar’s 2022 winter World Cup.
Human Rights and Legal Reforms
Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 strategy, spearheaded by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, positions sports investment as a key component of economic diversification. Since 2021, the kingdom has spent approximately £5 billion on hosting high-profile events in football, Formula 1, golf, and boxing. Additionally, its Public Investment Fund (PIF) has launched the LIV Golf series, acquired Newcastle United, and taken control of four Saudi Pro League clubs.
However, this aggressive push into sports has drawn criticism. Human rights organizations accuse Saudi Arabia of using sports to distract from its poor human rights record. Amnesty International and other groups have pointed to ongoing concerns, including restrictions on free speech, the criminalization of homosexuality, gender inequality, and allegations of exploitative labor practices.
FIFA’s report acknowledges these challenges but highlights the Saudi government’s commitments to addressing human rights issues. The report states: “The undertaking involved in implementing the various measures outlined in the Human Rights Strategy, particularly in certain areas, could involve significant effort and time… However, the considerable work and level of concrete commitment demonstrated by the bid and its key stakeholders, together with the demonstrable rate of progress and the 10-year time horizon, are mitigating factors to consider.”
Saudi Arabia has pledged to align with international human rights standards in areas such as labor rights, gender equality, and freedom of expression. Nevertheless, the report identifies gaps in legal reforms and stresses the need for effective enforcement to prevent risks such as poor working conditions. Regarding anti-discrimination policies, FIFA notes “gaps and reservations” where international standards conflict with Islamic law but commends Saudi Arabia’s commitment to fostering an inclusive tournament environment.
Environmental Implications of the 2034 World Cup
Environmental groups have raised concerns about the ecological impact of the Saudi bid. While FIFA’s report recognizes efforts to minimize the tournament’s carbon footprint, it also admits that the reliance on air travel between host cities will contribute to the event’s environmental impact. Saudi Arabia’s bid includes plans to expand its transport infrastructure and utilize sustainable construction practices to mitigate these effects.
The evaluation contrasts the 2034 tournament with the 2030 World Cup, which will span three continents and six countries: Spain, Portugal, Morocco, Uruguay, Argentina, and Paraguay. FIFA has acknowledged the significant environmental impact of the 2030 tournament, estimating a carbon footprint of 3.5 million tons of CO2. Critics argue that the global scale of the 2030 event will exacerbate climate change, despite measures to reduce its ecological impact.
Criticism from Campaign Groups
Amnesty International and other organizations have called for greater accountability and reforms before Saudi Arabia is confirmed as the 2034 host. Amnesty warned, “By ignoring the clear evidence of severe human rights risks, FIFA is likely to bear much responsibility for the violations and abuses that will take place over the coming decade.” The organization urged FIFA to demand substantial reforms from the Saudi government, particularly regarding labor rights and freedom of expression.
Last month, Amnesty criticized an independent report on Saudi Arabia’s treatment of migrant workers, describing it as “flawed” and inadequate. The organization continues to advocate for stricter measures to protect workers and prevent exploitation during the tournament’s preparation.
Broader Implications for FIFA and Saudi Arabia
FIFA’s decision to award Saudi Arabia the highest bid score in its history underscores the kingdom’s growing influence in global sports. However, the move has sparked debates about the ethical implications of hosting the World Cup in countries with controversial human rights records.
Saudi Arabia’s investments in sports are part of a broader effort to reshape its global image. The government argues that these initiatives are driving economic growth, promoting tourism, and encouraging social reforms. Critics, however, remain skeptical, viewing the investments as an attempt to divert attention from domestic issues and improve the kingdom’s international reputation.
FIFA’s report concludes with a cautiously optimistic view, suggesting that the 2034 World Cup could serve as a platform for positive change. “There is a good potential that the tournament could serve as a catalyst for some of the ongoing and future reforms and contribute to positive human rights outcomes for people in Saudi Arabia and the region that go beyond the scope of the tournament itself,” the report states.
Despite this optimism, the controversy surrounding Saudi Arabia’s bid highlights the complex interplay between sports, politics, and human rights. As FIFA prepares to finalize the hosting decision, the debate over the kingdom’s suitability to host the world’s biggest football event is unlikely to subside.