Isabela Ferrer Alleges Harassment by Justin Baldoni in Legal Claim

Isabela Ferrer, star of “It Ends With Us,” has accused Justin Baldoni of harassment, claiming he exerted legal pressure on her.

Isabela Ferrer, known for her role in the upcoming film “It Ends With Us,” has made serious allegations against actor Justin Baldoni. Ferrer claims that Baldoni engaged in harassment by exerting legal pressure on her.

The accusations come as both Ferrer and Baldoni prepare for a legal battle, with their cases set to go on trial in March 2026. The nature of the allegations has sparked significant attention, particularly given Baldoni’s prominence in the entertainment industry.

Ferrer has expressed her concerns regarding the impact of Baldoni’s actions on her career and personal life. She has stated that the pressure she faced was not only emotionally taxing but also detrimental to her professional opportunities.

The allegations against Baldoni add to a growing discourse surrounding harassment in Hollywood, where many individuals have come forward with their own experiences. The timing of Ferrer’s claims coincides with a broader movement advocating for accountability and change within the industry.

As the trial date approaches, both parties are expected to present their cases, shedding light on the circumstances surrounding the allegations. The outcome may have significant implications for both Ferrer and Baldoni, as well as for the broader conversation about harassment in the entertainment world.

Ferrer’s accusations highlight the ongoing challenges faced by individuals in the industry when confronting powerful figures. The legal proceedings will likely draw public interest and media coverage, as many are eager to see how the situation unfolds.

As the trial date nears, both Ferrer and Baldoni are preparing for what is expected to be a high-profile legal confrontation. The entertainment community is watching closely, as the case could set precedents for how similar allegations are handled in the future.

According to NDTV, the legal battles involving both Baldoni and fellow actor Blake Lively are set to commence in March 2026, further intensifying the scrutiny surrounding these high-profile figures.

Source: Original article

India’s Asia Cup 2025 Squad Announcement Delayed: Key Factors Explained

India’s cricket selectors are set to announce the squad for the Asia Cup 2025 following a meeting with BCCI secretary Devajit Saikia.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is gearing up for the announcement of the squad for the Asia Cup 2025. This follows a crucial meeting between BCCI secretary Devajit Saikia and the selectors, who have all gathered for this important event.

The anticipation surrounding the squad announcement is palpable, as fans and analysts alike are eager to see which players will be chosen to represent India in the prestigious tournament. The Asia Cup is a significant event in the cricket calendar, and the selection process is always closely scrutinized.

As the meeting progresses, discussions among the selectors will likely focus on player form, fitness, and team balance. The selectors will need to consider various factors, including recent performances in domestic and international matches, as well as the specific conditions expected during the tournament.

With the selectors present and the meeting underway, the announcement is expected to occur shortly. Fans are hopeful for a strong squad that can compete effectively against other top cricketing nations.

As the cricketing world awaits the final decision, the BCCI’s careful consideration of its player selections will be critical in shaping India’s chances in the tournament.

According to Source Name, the announcement will provide clarity on the team’s strategy and composition as they prepare for the challenges ahead in the Asia Cup 2025.

Source: Original article

China Offers Minerals to India Amidst Tensions from Galwan Clash

China’s recent commitment to address India’s rare-earth material needs signals a significant shift in bilateral relations following the tensions from the Galwan crisis in 2019.

China’s recent decision to consider India’s increasing demand for rare-earth materials represents a pivotal moment in the two nations’ relationship, which has been strained since the Galwan Valley clash in 2019.

The Galwan crisis, which resulted in casualties on both sides, marked a low point in Sino-Indian relations. Since then, both countries have navigated a complex landscape of geopolitical tensions, border disputes, and economic competition.

India’s reliance on imports for rare-earth elements, essential for various high-tech industries, has become a pressing concern. These materials are crucial for the production of electronics, renewable energy technologies, and defense systems. As global demand for these resources continues to rise, India’s need for a stable supply chain has become increasingly urgent.

China, which dominates the global supply of rare-earth elements, has the potential to play a significant role in meeting India’s needs. By addressing this demand, China may be seeking to mend fences and foster a more cooperative relationship with India.

Analysts suggest that this move could be interpreted as a strategic realignment, where both nations recognize the importance of collaboration over conflict. The promise to supply rare-earth materials could serve as a foundation for broader economic ties and diplomatic engagement.

However, skepticism remains regarding the sincerity of China’s intentions. Critics argue that while this offer may appear beneficial, it could also be a tactic to gain leverage over India in a time of heightened geopolitical competition.

As India continues to develop its own rare-earth processing capabilities, the relationship with China will be closely monitored. The balance between dependence on Chinese resources and the pursuit of self-sufficiency will be a critical factor in shaping future interactions.

In conclusion, China’s commitment to addressing India’s rare-earth needs could signify a thaw in relations, but the complexities of their historical tensions and current geopolitical dynamics will play a crucial role in determining the outcome.

Source: Original article

Tata Consultancy Services Shares Decline Following Layoff Announcement

Tata Consultancy Services’ shares declined on Monday after the company announced plans to lay off approximately 12,200 employees in fiscal year 2026.

Shares of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), a leading player in the technology sector, experienced a downturn on Monday. This decline followed the company’s recent announcement regarding significant layoffs.

TCS revealed that it plans to reduce its workforce by approximately 12,200 employees in fiscal year 2026. This decision has raised concerns among investors and analysts, contributing to the drop in the company’s stock price.

The announcement comes amid a broader trend in the tech industry, where many companies are reassessing their workforce in response to changing market conditions and economic pressures. TCS’s decision to downsize reflects the challenges faced by the sector as it navigates a post-pandemic landscape.

As one of the largest IT services firms globally, TCS’s workforce reduction is significant. The company has been a key player in providing technology solutions and services to various industries, and such a move could have implications for its operational capabilities and market position.

Investors are closely monitoring the situation, as layoffs can often signal deeper issues within a company or sector. The market’s reaction to TCS’s announcement underscores the sensitivity of investors to employment changes within major corporations.

In the wake of the announcement, TCS’s shares have faced pressure, reflecting investor sentiment regarding the company’s future prospects. The layoffs are expected to be part of a broader strategy to streamline operations and enhance efficiency in a competitive environment.

As TCS moves forward with its plans, stakeholders will be watching closely to see how the company manages this transition and what impact it will have on its overall performance in the coming years.

According to NDTV, the situation remains fluid as TCS navigates these changes in its workforce.

Source: Original article

RBI Governor Discusses Future Trade Agreements Following UK Deal

Reserve Bank Governor Sanjay Malhotra expressed support for the recent free trade agreement with the UK, highlighting its potential benefits for various sectors of the Indian economy.

On Friday, Reserve Bank of India Governor Sanjay Malhotra praised the newly signed free trade agreement (FTA) with the United Kingdom, emphasizing its significance for the Indian economy.

Malhotra stated that the FTA is expected to provide a boost to multiple sectors, enhancing trade relations between India and the UK. He noted that such agreements are crucial for fostering economic growth and expanding market access for Indian businesses.

The Governor’s remarks come at a time when India is actively pursuing trade agreements with various countries to strengthen its economic ties globally. The FTA with the UK is seen as a strategic move to enhance bilateral trade and investment opportunities.

Malhotra’s endorsement of the agreement reflects a broader vision for India’s economic landscape, where trade partnerships play a vital role in driving growth and innovation. The Governor highlighted the importance of these agreements in creating a more resilient and competitive economy.

As India continues to navigate the complexities of global trade, the establishment of FTAs with key partners like the UK is expected to facilitate smoother trade flows and reduce barriers for Indian exporters.

In conclusion, the Reserve Bank Governor’s support for the UK free trade agreement underscores the potential benefits it holds for the Indian economy, paving the way for enhanced collaboration and growth in various sectors.

Source: Original article

Trump-Putin Summit Concludes Without Ukraine Ceasefire Agreement

The summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin concluded without progress on a Ukraine ceasefire, emphasizing instead the personal rapport between the two leaders.

The much-anticipated summit between President Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin ended without a breakthrough on the critical issue of a ceasefire in Ukraine. Instead, the focus appeared to shift towards the personal dynamics between the two leaders rather than the ongoing conflict.

During their nearly three-hour meeting, both Trump and Putin seemed to highlight their developing friendship, overshadowing the urgent need for resolution in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Despite hopeful expectations, the summit did not produce any concrete agreements regarding the war, leaving the central issue conspicuously unresolved.

President Putin made a notable statement confirming that he would not have invaded Ukraine had Trump been in office during 2022, providing a boost to Trump’s longstanding claims. This remark seemed to serve as a diplomatic endorsement of Trump’s position throughout the conflict. However, Putin’s stance on Ukraine itself remained unchanged, citing security threats as the primary concern for Russia’s actions in the region.

Putin emphasized the necessity of addressing the fundamental causes of the conflict for any lasting settlement, indicating no immediate shift towards a peace agreement. This approach ran counter to any expectations of a quick resolution or ceasefire from the summit.

President Trump acknowledged the lack of definitive progress by stating, “We’ve made some headway. So there’s no deal until there’s a deal.” He also mentioned that while many points were agreed upon, significant issues remain unresolved.

Following the summit, Trump planned to communicate with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine and NATO leaders to debrief them on the discussions. However, much to the surprise of the gathered press, the leaders did not entertain any questions during their news conference held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. Before departing, Trump indicated the possibility of another meeting soon, perhaps in Moscow.

The summit’s outcome was vague and did not meet expectations for significant progress towards peace. It afforded Putin the opportunity to maintain his current military strategy in Ukraine or refine his broader approach toward the U.S. and Europe without committing to a ceasefire. Nevertheless, there was no public discord between the two leaders, suggesting that any substantial discussions may have occurred behind closed doors.

For Ukraine, led by President Zelensky, the lack of attention to land-swapping proposals—that would see Ukraine relinquish part of its territory currently under Russian control—was seen as a temporary relief. Many experts contend that any conclusion to the war might necessitate territorial concessions, although such an agreement appears distant given Putin’s current military gains and strategies.

According to Indica News, the summit concluded without any remarkable agreements, leaving the international community and involved stakeholders uncertain about the immediate future in the region.

Source: Original article

Air Canada Flights Grounded as 10,000 Crew Members Strike

Air Canada has suspended all flights following a strike by its flight attendants, affecting approximately 130,000 daily passengers and causing significant disruption during the summer travel season.

Air Canada announced a complete shutdown of its operations on Saturday after its flight attendants went on strike. This sudden action has resulted in widespread travel chaos, particularly impacting the airline’s approximately 130,000 daily passengers.

The strike comes at a peak time for summer travel, leaving many travelers stranded or forced to make alternative arrangements. With Air Canada being one of the largest airlines in the country, the implications of this strike are significant, affecting not only those booked on Air Canada flights but also the broader travel ecosystem.

As the situation unfolds, travelers are advised to stay updated on the developments and check for any potential rebooking options or refunds. The airline has not yet provided a timeline for when operations might resume or how it plans to address the backlog of canceled flights.

This strike highlights ongoing labor disputes within the airline industry, as workers seek better conditions and compensation. The decision to strike reflects the frustrations of flight attendants who have been advocating for improved working conditions and pay.

As the summer travel season continues, the impact of this strike is expected to ripple through airports and travel plans across the country. Passengers are encouraged to monitor Air Canada’s official channels for the latest information regarding their flights and any potential rescheduling options.

According to NDTV, the airline’s management is currently in discussions with union representatives in hopes of reaching a resolution that could bring an end to the strike and restore flight operations.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Endorsement of Pakistan Reportedly Strained US-India Relations

US President Donald Trump’s endorsement of Pakistan has significantly undermined the two-decade-long partnership between the United States and India, according to a recent report.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A report published on August 14 highlights that US President Donald Trump’s approach to India, combined with his repeated endorsements of Pakistan, has severely damaged the relationship between the two nations. This partnership, once considered a defining aspect of the 21st century, has suffered as a result of Trump’s actions.

The report, released by the International Centre for Peace Studies (ICPS), indicates that Trump’s policies have gone beyond economic tariffs, as he has “repeatedly and deliberately” challenged India’s core national security concerns, particularly regarding Kashmir. This has struck at the heart of India’s most sensitive issues.

Previous US administrations, including those of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama, invested considerable effort into building strategic trust with India. They respected India’s red lines concerning Kashmir and refrained from actions that could embolden Pakistan. In stark contrast, Trump’s administration has publicly praised Pakistan, empowered its military leadership, and undermined India’s regional standing. This shift has weakened India’s fight against cross-border terrorism on the global stage, according to the report.

Recently, the United States has also provided a platform for Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff, General Asim Munir, to issue nuclear threats against India. This marks a significant and unprecedented downturn in the relationship between Washington and New Delhi.

“By repeatedly endorsing Pakistan and ignoring India’s core concerns, Trump has eroded two decades of mutual trust,” a senior Indian diplomat stated in the report. The diplomat likened the current situation to a return to Cold War-era suspicion and strategic distance.

The report emphasizes the seriousness of the aggressive remarks made on American soil, particularly the nuclear threat in which Munir stated that Pakistan is a nuclear nation ready to “take half the world down with us.” Such alarming statements not only highlight Pakistan’s hostile intent but also reflect the strategic confidence it has gained from recent US support.

In the midst of this diplomatic turmoil, the report notes a noticeable shift in Beijing’s tone towards India, which should serve as a clear warning to Washington. The Chinese Foreign Ministry has criticized US tariffs on Indian goods, warning that “if you give a bully an inch, he will take a mile.” This sentiment has been echoed across state-controlled media, portraying Trump’s trade approach as unreasonable and strategically misguided.

Following the imposition of significant tariffs on India by the US, Chinese state media has praised India, demonstrating “respect and urgency” in hosting Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his upcoming visit. The Global Times, a Chinese state-run newspaper, has highlighted that “as regional powers, China and India have extensive shared interests in areas such as counterterrorism, trade, and cultural exchange.” It further stressed that “a healthy China–India relationship brings positive spillover effects to the region and the world.”

The ICPS report concludes that the US must recognize that weakening India does not enhance its position; rather, it empowers its rivals. Every key US strategic document underscores India’s importance in counterbalancing China in the Indo-Pacific region.

According to the report, the current trajectory of US-India relations poses a significant challenge to the long-standing partnership that has been carefully cultivated over the past two decades.

Source: Original article

Jairam Criticizes PM Modi’s Remarks on RSS as Desperate Attempt

Congress criticized Prime Minister Modi’s Independence Day speech, calling it “stale and troubling,” particularly for its mention of the RSS, which they deemed a breach of secular values.

New Delhi: The Congress party has sharply criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day speech, labeling it as “stale and troubling.” The party expressed particular concern over Modi’s reference to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which they argue undermines the principles of a constitutional, secular republic. Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh described the mention of the RSS as a “desperate attempt to appease his organization” ahead of Modi’s 75th birthday next month.

In a post on X, Ramesh stated, “The Prime Minister’s speech from the ramparts of the Red Fort today was stale, hypocritical, insipid, and troubling.” He criticized the Prime Minister for recycling slogans such as Viksit Bharat, Atmanirbhar Bharat, and “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas,” claiming that these phrases have been repeated year after year with little tangible progress to show for them.

Ramesh specifically called out the repeated promises regarding the “Made-in-India” semiconductor chip initiative, stating that it has been touted numerous times without any actual delivery. He noted that the first Semiconductor Complex in India was established in Chandigarh in the early 1980s, suggesting that Modi’s claims are misleading.

The Congress leader also addressed issues concerning farmers, asserting that the government’s rhetoric on protecting their interests has become hollow. He pointed to Modi’s previous attempts to push through three controversial farm laws and the lack of a legal guarantee for Minimum Support Prices (MSP). Ramesh emphasized the absence of a credible roadmap for job creation, stating that the government’s promises in this area have become mere lip service.

Ramesh further criticized Modi’s claims of promoting unity, inclusion, and democracy, arguing that the Prime Minister has overseen the erosion of key constitutional institutions, including the Election Commission. He highlighted the recent Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls in Bihar, which has reportedly disenfranchised over 6.5 million voters, as a significant concern.

He remarked that Modi’s assertions of empowering states ring hollow when the central government continues to undermine federalism and marginalize state governments, particularly those led by opposition parties.

Ramesh expressed that Independence Day should serve as a moment for vision, candor, and inspiration, rather than a platform for self-congratulation and selective storytelling. He criticized Modi’s speech for failing to address the deep economic distress, rising unemployment, and increasing economic inequality in society.

Regarding the Prime Minister’s mention of the RSS, Ramesh stated, “The most troubling element of the Prime Minister’s speech today was his name-checking of the RSS from the ramparts of the Red Fort — a blatant breach of the spirit of a constitutional, secular republic.” He added that this politicization of Independence Day for personal and organizational gain is detrimental to the democratic ethos of the nation.

Ramesh concluded by suggesting that Modi appears fatigued and is now reliant on the RSS for support, particularly in light of the political landscape shifting after the events of June 4, 2024. He remarked, “This politicization of Independence Day for personal and organizational gain is deeply corrosive to our democratic ethos,” and quipped that the Prime Minister is “tired today and soon he will be retired.”

These remarks followed Modi’s 97-minute address, during which he highlighted the RSS as one of the world’s largest non-governmental organizations, celebrating its centenary and its contributions to nation-building and character development.

Source: Original article

Kishtwar Cloudburst: Relief Measures and Home Reconstruction Announced

Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha has pledged support for victims of a devastating cloudburst in Kishtwar, which has resulted in at least 65 fatalities and ongoing rescue operations.

Srinagar: Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha has expressed his commitment to supporting the victims of a catastrophic cloudburst that struck Chasoti village in Kishtwar district, claiming at least 65 lives.

In a recent post on X, Sinha detailed his discussions with senior officials regarding the ongoing rescue and relief operations. He emphasized the need for immediate assistance and the provision of essential supplies to the families affected by this disaster.

“I spoke to senior officials and took stock of the rescue and relief operations at Chasoti, Kishtwar. I will ensure the reconstruction of homes damaged in flash floods. Immediate relief and essential supplies have been directed,” Sinha stated.

The cloudburst led to severe flash floods in the remote area, resulting in the destruction of homes and the displacement of numerous families. Rescue operations are currently being conducted by the National Disaster Response Force (NDRF), State Disaster Response Force (SDRF), Jammu and Kashmir Police, Indian Army, and local administration.

As of now, officials have confirmed that the death toll has reached 65, with many individuals still reported missing. Search and rescue efforts are ongoing, being conducted at a rapid pace despite the challenging terrain and adverse weather conditions.

The situation remains critical as authorities work tirelessly to locate missing persons and provide necessary aid to those affected by this tragic event. The community is rallying together in the face of adversity, with local and national agencies collaborating to ensure that relief efforts are effective and timely.

In the wake of this disaster, the Lieutenant Governor’s assurance of support and reconstruction efforts offers a glimmer of hope to the residents of Kishtwar as they begin to navigate the aftermath of this devastating incident.

Source: Original article

30 Dead, Over 200 Missing After Cloudburst in Kishtwar

At least 30 people have died and over 200 are missing following a devastating cloudburst in Kishtwar’s Chosoti village, prompting extensive rescue operations amid challenging conditions.

KISHTWAR: The devastation in Jammu and Kashmir’s Kishtwar district intensified on Thursday as officials confirmed that at least 30 individuals, including two Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) personnel, have lost their lives due to a massive cloudburst that struck Chosoti village along the Machail Mata Yatra route. More than 200 people are currently reported missing, while rescue teams are facing treacherous weather and difficult terrain in their efforts to locate survivors.

The cloudburst triggered severe flash floods, which swept away homes, roads, and bridges in the remote Paddar region. Large portions of the last motorable settlement before the shrine are now buried under debris, with authorities describing the destruction as “widespread and severe.”

According to officials, approximately 100 individuals have sustained injuries, with 37 in critical condition. These critically injured patients have been transported to the District Hospital in Kishtwar, while around 70 to 80 others are receiving treatment at the Sub-District Hospital in Paddar. Additional medical teams have been mobilized from neighboring districts to assist in the response.

In the wake of this tragedy, the annual Machail Mata Yatra has been suspended. The Civil Administration, along with the Army, National Disaster Response Force (NDRF), State Disaster Response Force (SDRF), and other security forces, have been deployed to expedite rescue and relief operations. Heavy machinery is being utilized to clear access routes, and aerial reconnaissance missions are underway to identify stranded groups in isolated hamlets.

Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha expressed profound sorrow over the loss of life, directing officials to ensure “all possible assistance” is provided to the affected families. “My heartfelt condolences to the bereaved families and prayers for the recovery of the injured,” he stated.

Union Minister Jitendra Singh confirmed that central agencies are actively supporting local authorities in the rescue efforts. “Rescue teams are on the ground, and every possible effort is being made to trace the missing,” he noted.

Officials have cautioned that the casualty count may rise, as many villages remain inaccessible due to damaged roads and ongoing rainfall, which is hampering relief efforts. Rescue teams are working tirelessly, prioritizing the evacuation of critically injured and vulnerable individuals from the disaster zone.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Community Celebrates Cultural Heritage at Annual Festival

USCIS provides a comprehensive resource for news, updates, and statistics related to immigration and citizenship on its dedicated Newsroom webpage.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has established a centralized Newsroom webpage that serves as a vital resource for the public. This platform offers a variety of news releases and alerts, which are searchable by topic and date, ensuring that users can easily find the information they need.

In addition to news releases, the USCIS Newsroom includes updates on policies and procedures, as well as important announcements regarding office closures and other emergencies. This feature is particularly useful for individuals seeking timely information about USCIS operations.

For those interested in visual content, the Newsroom also hosts a Video and Image Gallery. This section provides access to images and videos that showcase USCIS operations, offering a behind-the-scenes look at the agency’s work.

Data enthusiasts will appreciate the Immigration and Citizenship Data page, which presents various categories of immigration data and statistics. This resource is essential for researchers, policymakers, and anyone looking to understand immigration trends in the United States.

USCIS maintains an active presence on social media, with several accounts dedicated to providing the latest updates and information. Following these accounts can help individuals stay informed about changes and announcements from the agency.

The Newsroom also features a section for recent speeches, statements, and congressional testimony from USCIS leadership. These documents are searchable by topic and date, allowing users to access important discussions and insights from agency officials.

For those seeking more in-depth information, the Electronic Reading Room offers access to documents identified under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Users can search for topics of interest using a convenient drop-down list, making it easier to find specific information.

USCIS understands the importance of communication with the media and has established a network of agency representatives across the country to respond to media inquiries. This ensures that journalists and the public can obtain accurate and timely information about immigration and citizenship matters.

Additionally, the Newsroom provides information about upcoming events, including local and national engagements. This feature allows the community to stay informed about opportunities to engage with USCIS and participate in discussions related to immigration issues.

Overall, the USCIS Newsroom is a comprehensive resource designed to keep the public informed about immigration and citizenship matters. By providing access to news, data, and multimedia content, USCIS aims to enhance transparency and communication with the community.

Source: Original article

Six Pillars for India’s Future: PM Modi’s Independence Day Address

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 79th Independence Day speech outlines a vision for India’s transformation by 2047, focusing on technology, energy, economic reforms, employment, and national security.

On the 79th Independence Day, Prime Minister Narendra Modi delivered a forward-looking address from the historic Red Fort, outlining a series of strategic commitments aimed at transforming India into a Viksit Bharat (developed nation) by the centenary of independence in 2047.

This marked Modi’s twelfth Independence Day speech, making him the Prime Minister with the most addresses from this platform. Lasting 105 minutes, it was the longest speech he has delivered on this occasion, presenting concrete deliverables with measurable timelines and long-term structural impacts.

In his speech, Modi reflected on the challenges faced in establishing semiconductor plants in India, noting that previous attempts had been “killed at birth” decades ago while other nations advanced. He announced that India is now in mission mode to bridge this critical technological gap, stating that the country will roll out its first Made in India chip by the end of this year. This initiative aims to insulate Indian industries from the supply chain disruptions and shortages that have hindered manufacturing in other parts of the world.

Addressing energy security, Modi unveiled ambitious plans to increase nuclear power generation capacity tenfold by 2047. He revealed that work is already underway on ten new reactors. Additionally, he launched the National Deepwater Exploration Mission, which aims to tap into ocean resources while expanding domestic capacity in solar, hydrogen, hydro, and nuclear power. This initiative is designed to reduce dependence on imported petrol, diesel, and gas, which Modi described as a persistent burden on the national budget.

Economic reforms were a focal point of Modi’s address, with the announcement of next-generation GST measures set to be rolled out during Diwali in October. These reforms will reduce taxes on essential goods and provide relief to micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), local vendors, and consumers.

Modi emphasized that these reforms would be supported by a newly formed Task Force for Next-Generation Reforms. This body will evaluate all current laws, rules, and procedures related to economic activity, with a fixed timeline to implement changes that will cut compliance costs for startups, MSMEs, and entrepreneurs. The aim is to create a supportive ecosystem for innovation and sustained economic growth, preparing India for the demands of a $10 trillion economy by 2047.

Employment generation was another key pillar of Modi’s speech, highlighted by the launch of the Rs 1 lakh crore PM Viksit Bharat Rozgar Yojana. Under this scheme, newly employed youth will receive Rs 15,000 per month, with a target of reaching three crore beneficiaries.

In a significant announcement with strategic implications, Modi called on India’s scientists, engineers, and youth to take on the challenge of developing a fully indigenous jet engine. Drawing parallels to India’s rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines and the creation of the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) for digital payments, he urged that the same resolve be directed toward advancing high-end defense technology. The goal is to ensure that the engines powering India’s skies are entirely home-grown, marking a decisive step toward strategic self-reliance.

Additionally, Modi announced the launch of a High-Powered Demography Mission aimed at addressing the risks posed by illegal migration and demographic imbalances in border areas. He stated that the mission would protect the unity, integrity, and rights of India’s citizens while systematically tackling infiltration concerns. This announcement coincides with the Election Commission of India’s efforts to clean electoral rolls to ensure that non-citizens do not have the ability to vote.

As India moves toward its centenary of independence, Modi’s speech outlined a comprehensive vision that encompasses technological advancement, energy security, economic reform, employment generation, and national security, all aimed at positioning the nation for a prosperous future.

Source: Original article

Sensex and Nifty Fall Amid Concerns Over U.S. Tariff Imposition

U.S. President Donald Trump has announced a 25 percent tariff on all goods imported from India, effective August 1, raising concerns in the market.

U.S. President Donald Trump has declared a significant economic measure that is set to impact trade relations between the United States and India. Starting August 1, a 25 percent tariff will be imposed on all goods imported from India. This announcement has sent ripples through financial markets, raising concerns among investors and analysts alike.

In addition to the tariff on Indian goods, President Trump also indicated that there would be unspecified penalties for purchasing Russian crude oil and military equipment. This dual announcement has heightened tensions in international trade and could lead to further complications in U.S.-India relations.

The imposition of tariffs is a strategic move that reflects the ongoing trade negotiations and disputes between the two nations. Analysts are closely monitoring the potential repercussions of this decision, as it could affect various sectors of the Indian economy, including manufacturing and exports.

Market reactions have been swift, with both the Sensex and Nifty indices showing declines as investors digest the implications of the tariff announcement. The uncertainty surrounding trade policies often leads to volatility in stock markets, and this situation appears to be no exception.

As the situation develops, stakeholders from both countries will be watching closely to see how these tariffs will influence trade dynamics and economic growth. The long-term effects of such measures could reshape the landscape of U.S.-India trade relations.

According to NDTV, the announcement has raised alarms among businesses that rely heavily on exports to the U.S., which may now face increased costs and competitive disadvantages.

Source: Original article

Trump and Putin Set for High-Stakes Summit in Alaska on Ukraine War

US President Donald Trump is set to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska for a pivotal summit regarding the ongoing war in Ukraine and its implications for European security.

US President Donald Trump is scheduled to meet face-to-face with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. This high-stakes summit is anticipated to have significant implications for the ongoing war in Ukraine and the broader landscape of European security.

The meeting comes at a critical juncture, as the conflict in Ukraine continues to evolve, drawing international attention and concern. Both leaders are expected to discuss various strategies and potential resolutions to the ongoing crisis, which has already had far-reaching effects on geopolitical stability.

Analysts suggest that the outcomes of this summit could shape not only the immediate future of Ukraine but also the security dynamics across Europe. With tensions remaining high, the discussions between Trump and Putin may provide a platform for addressing key issues that have strained relations between Russia and Western nations.

As the world watches closely, the stakes are undeniably high for both leaders. The meeting represents an opportunity for dialogue and negotiation, which could lead to a de-escalation of hostilities in Ukraine and foster a more stable security environment in Europe.

In the lead-up to the summit, there has been a flurry of diplomatic activity, with various stakeholders weighing in on the potential outcomes. The international community remains hopeful that the meeting will yield constructive results, paving the way for a peaceful resolution to the ongoing conflict.

Ultimately, the summit in Alaska is poised to be a defining moment in the relationship between the United States and Russia, with implications that could resonate well beyond the immediate context of the Ukraine war.

According to NDTV, the meeting underscores the importance of direct communication between the two leaders as they navigate one of the most pressing geopolitical challenges of our time.

Source: Original article

Ten Feared Dead After Cloudburst Strikes Chosoti Village in Kishtwar

At least 10 people are feared dead following a cloudburst in Chosoti village, halting the Machail Mata Yatra and prompting extensive rescue operations in Kishtwar district.

A devastating cloudburst in Chosoti, a remote village located on the route to the sacred Machail Mata shrine in Kishtwar district, has left at least 10 people feared dead, according to officials. The incident occurred on Thursday, striking the last motorable point before the shrine and abruptly halting the annual pilgrimage, plunging the region into mourning.

Officials reported that torrential rains triggered the sudden disaster, which swept away structures and left numerous individuals trapped or missing. In response to the tragedy, authorities swiftly suspended the Machail Mata Yatra and mobilized all available resources for rescue and relief efforts.

A team led by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Paddar arrived at the affected site within hours of the incident. Deputy Commissioner Pankaj Kumar Sharma and Senior Superintendent of Police Naresh Singh also rushed to the scene to oversee the ground operations. Rescue forces, including the Army, National Disaster Response Force (NDRF), and State Disaster Response Force (SDRF), have joined local police and civil administration in a coordinated mission to save lives and provide emergency assistance.

Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha expressed his deep sorrow over the loss of lives, stating, “Anguished by the cloudburst in Chosoti, Kishtwar. Condolences to bereaved families and prayers for quick recovery of the injured. Directed officials to provide all possible assistance to those affected.”

Union Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office, Jitendra Singh, confirmed the incident and assured that the administration had “swung into action,” with rescue teams already deployed at the site.

Authorities have activated NDRF, SDRF, and security forces to expedite the rescue operation. Teams are working tirelessly around the clock to locate the missing, evacuate survivors, and provide urgent medical assistance, all while contending with heavy rains and challenging terrain.

The situation remains critical as rescue operations continue, and the community grapples with the aftermath of this tragic event.

Source: Original article

Female Police Officers Assume Leadership Roles in Kashmir’s LoC Districts

Jammu and Kashmir Police have deployed trained female officers in Line of Control districts to enhance security and counter potential terror threats ahead of Independence Day.

Srinagar: In a proactive measure to address potential security threats, the Jammu and Kashmir Police have deployed trained women officers in the Line of Control (LoC) districts of North Kashmir. This initiative comes in response to intelligence reports indicating that some women may be acting as Over Ground Workers (OGWs) for terrorist organizations.

The deployment of female officers is particularly significant during the heightened security period leading up to Independence Day. These officers are actively engaged in ground-level security operations, focusing on frisking and surveillance duties to ensure public safety. Their presence is intended to bolster the overall security framework and enhance the police force’s ability to identify and deter any suspicious activities involving women.

Historically, several female OGW suspects have been apprehended for their involvement in aiding terrorist activities. This includes smuggling weapons, providing logistical support, and participating in grenade attacks against security forces. Investigations have revealed that many of these women were motivated and financially compensated by terrorist groups to carry out such actions.

The involvement of female officers in security operations not only addresses the immediate concerns of potential threats but also aims to foster a sense of safety and trust within the community. Their training equips them to handle sensitive situations, particularly those involving women, which can often be challenging in conflict zones.

As Independence Day approaches, the Jammu and Kashmir Police remain vigilant, utilizing every resource at their disposal to maintain peace and security in the region. The deployment of female officers is a strategic move that highlights the importance of inclusivity in law enforcement, particularly in areas where women may be more approachable than their male counterparts.

This initiative reflects a broader trend within law enforcement agencies to incorporate women into various roles, recognizing their unique perspectives and capabilities in community policing and security operations.

The ongoing efforts by the Jammu and Kashmir Police to enhance security measures in the region underscore the complexities of maintaining peace in a sensitive area like the LoC. The deployment of trained female officers is a crucial step in addressing these challenges and ensuring the safety of all residents.

According to reports, the presence of these officers has already begun to make a difference in the community, with residents expressing greater confidence in the security measures being implemented.

As the nation prepares to celebrate Independence Day, the commitment of the Jammu and Kashmir Police to ensure a safe environment for all is evident. The deployment of female officers stands as a testament to their dedication to public safety and their proactive approach in tackling potential threats.

Source: Original article

Rahul Gandhi Thanks Election Commission Amid Controversy Over Comments

Rahul Gandhi criticizes the Election Commission for incorrectly removing living voters from the rolls in Bihar, humorously claiming to have “tea with the dead” as part of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision controversy.

New Delhi: Amid ongoing criticism from the Congress party regarding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls in Bihar, Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, has taken a humorous jab at the Election Commission (EC). He suggested that he has had the peculiar experience of having “tea with the dead” due to the erroneous removal of seven living voters from the electoral rolls.

In a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, Gandhi remarked, “There have been many interesting experiences in life, but I never got the chance to have a sip of tea with ‘dead people.’ For this unique experience, thank you, Election Commission.”

The Congress party issued a statement highlighting that the seven voters in question, who are all very much alive, had shared tea with Gandhi earlier in the day, despite the EC’s SIR listing them as deceased. The individuals—Ramikbal Ray, Harendra Ray, Lalmuni Devi, Vachiya Devi, Lalwati Devi, Punam Kumari, and Munna Kumar—are associated with the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav’s assembly constituency of Raghopur.

The party claimed that these voters were removed from the electoral rolls even though they had completed the necessary paperwork for the SIR process. The Election Commission has not publicly disclosed the lists of individuals it has classified as deceased or migrated.

According to the Congress, their teams on the ground were able to identify these voters only through informal channels at two to three polling booths. “These seven represent only a fraction of unjustly deleted voters in those booths. This is not a clerical error—it is political disenfranchisement in plain sight,” the party asserted.

The Congress further alleged that the SIR exercise is part of a broader strategy to disenfranchise voters ahead of the crucial assembly elections in Bihar. They accused the EC of attempting to remove lakhs of voters from the rolls, dubbing the SIR process as “vote bandi” and a “daylight robbery of votes.”

In light of these developments, the Congress party has intensified its scrutiny of the Election Commission, arguing that the integrity of the electoral process is at stake. The situation has raised concerns about the potential impact on voter turnout and the overall fairness of the upcoming elections.

As the controversy unfolds, it remains to be seen how the Election Commission will respond to these allegations and whether any corrective measures will be taken to address the concerns raised by the opposition.

Source: Original article

Opposition to Select Vice Presidential Candidate by August 18 or 19

The Congress party is set to finalize its candidate for the vice presidential elections, with Mallikarjun Kharge consulting INDIA bloc partners ahead of the nomination deadline.

New Delhi: The Congress party has confirmed that the Opposition will field a candidate for the upcoming vice presidential elections. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge has been assigned the task of consulting with partners in the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) bloc. A meeting to finalize the candidate is expected to take place by August 18 or 19, according to sources.

The Election Commission has released the schedule for the vice presidential elections, which will commence with nominations starting on August 7. The last date to file nominations is August 21, followed by scrutiny on August 22. Candidates will have until August 25 to withdraw their nominations. The election itself is scheduled for September 9, with counting occurring on the same day.

Top sources within the Congress party have indicated that Kharge is actively engaging in discussions with various leaders from the INDIA bloc to determine a suitable candidate. These telephonic conversations aim to ensure that the chosen candidate embodies the constitutional values and serves as a voice for democracy.

The need for a new vice president arose after Jagdeep Dhankhar unexpectedly resigned on July 21, the first day of Parliament’s Monsoon Session, citing health reasons. His resignation was accepted by President Droupadi Murmu, prompting the Election Commission to announce the timeline for selecting his successor.

As the deadline for nominations approaches, the opposition parties are focused on identifying a candidate who can effectively represent their collective values and priorities. The upcoming meeting is crucial for aligning the interests of the various parties within the INDIA bloc, ensuring a unified front in the electoral process.

With the stakes high in this election, the opposition is keen to present a candidate who not only meets the expectations of their coalition partners but also resonates with the broader electorate.

As discussions continue, the outcome of the INDIA bloc’s deliberations will play a significant role in shaping the political landscape in the lead-up to the September elections.

Source: Original article

Adani Power Reports 27.1% Sequential Growth in Q1 Revenue

Adani Power reported a remarkable 27.1% sequential increase in its Q1 FY26 revenue, reaching Rs 3,305 crore, compared to Rs 2,599.23 crore in the previous quarter.

Adani Power announced on Friday a significant financial milestone, revealing a 27.1 percent sequential increase in its revenue for the April-June quarter of fiscal year 2026 (Q1 FY26). The company’s revenue reached Rs 3,305 crore, a notable rise from the Rs 2,599.23 crore reported in the preceding quarter (Q4 FY25).

This impressive growth reflects Adani Power’s robust operational performance and strategic initiatives aimed at enhancing its market position. The surge in revenue is indicative of the company’s ability to capitalize on favorable market conditions and demand for power generation.

As one of India’s leading power producers, Adani Power has been focusing on expanding its capacity and improving efficiency across its operations. The company’s commitment to sustainability and renewable energy sources has also played a crucial role in its growth trajectory.

Investors and analysts are likely to view this financial performance as a positive sign of the company’s resilience and potential for future growth. The increase in revenue not only underscores Adani Power’s operational strength but also reflects broader trends in the energy sector.

As the company continues to navigate the evolving energy landscape, stakeholders will be keenly observing its strategies and performance in the upcoming quarters.

According to NDTV, this sequential surge positions Adani Power favorably as it strives to meet the growing energy demands of the country while maintaining a focus on sustainable practices.

Source: Original article

Israel Plans to Control Gaza City Amid War Escalation

Israel’s military plans to extend its operations into Gaza City, the epicenter of the Gaza Strip, with the intention of taking control of the remaining areas not yet under Israeli occupation.

Israel’s Security Cabinet endorsed a proposal early Friday for the military to broaden its campaign in Gaza, aiming to take over Gaza City, one of the last areas in the territory not fully occupied by Israeli forces. The decision, made during a meeting that stretched late into the night, outlines steps for eventually exerting control over all of Gaza.

The announcement from the Prime Minister’s Office comes nearly two years into a conflict characterized by Israeli airstrikes and attacks, which have led to the deaths of at least 61,000 Palestinians, including a significant number of children, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry.

Despite extensive destruction due to airstrikes and raids, Gaza City remains a crucial location within Gaza. It hosts several partially functioning hospitals, a church sheltering minority Christians, and tent encampments for tens of thousands of displaced individuals. While Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office carefully avoided labeling this takeover as an occupation, the United Nations states that nearly 90% of Gaza is already under military control, designated as off-limits to Palestinians.

Israeli forces are present in eastern Gaza City, operating amidst almost continuous airstrikes. The strategy for advancing further into densely populated regions, or the possible destinations for those displaced by the conflict, remains unclear as the region faces a U.N.-acknowledged famine.

Netanyahu’s Office mentioned plans to distribute aid outside combat zones, though details were sparse. In response, Hamas warned that Israel’s attempt to capture Gaza City “will cost it a heavy price,” asserting the resilience of Gaza’s people and their resistance against defeat.

The families of Israelis taken hostage by militants in Gaza are urgently calling for a ceasefire, fearing that military actions could endanger their loved ones. Einav Zangauker, whose son, Matan, remains a hostage, expressed that Netanyahu had assured her of a resolution, but she felt betrayed, describing his assurances as deceptive.

Echoing the concerns, opposition leader Yair Lapid criticized the decision, calling it a “disaster” that would create further chaos, aligning with what he perceives as Hamas’s strategy to entangle Israel in an unending conflict.

Public opinion within Israel is split over the continuation of the war, with major protests emerging in Tel Aviv demanding a ceasefire. Additionally, hundreds of former Israeli generals and security figures urged the U.S. President to intervene and stop the war, suggesting that Hamas no longer poses a strategic threat after its deadly attack in October 2023.

While Netanyahu faces mounting global calls to end the conflict and increase humanitarian aid to Gaza, he has resisted. Asked about Israel’s potential occupation of all Gaza, President Trump indicated the decision was largely Israel’s to make.

Israel’s Security Cabinet set forth five conditions for ending the war: disarming Hamas, the release of roughly 50 hostages, disarming the territory, establishing Israeli security oversight, and forming a civil administration neither led by Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority.

Details about the implementation of these conditions are still unclear. An alternative military strategy for Gaza proposed and rejected by the Security Cabinet included the viewpoints of two far-right ministers advocating for the comprehensive expulsion of Palestinians.

Individuals in Gaza, like 38-year-old Mahmoud Abdel Salam Ahmed, are already preparing for further displacement upon hearing the new developments, despite the challenging conditions. Others, such as 32-year-old Mohaneb Yahya al-Sahhar, question the feasibility of Israel’s plans, emphasizing Gazans’ tenacity in the face of adversity.

Ali al-Hanafi Abu Hassan, once a resident of Gaza City, finds it impossible to endure another evacuation after losing his home and two children. Abbas, the Palestinian Authority President, condemned Israel’s decision, labeling it a continuation of violence and a breach of international law.

Internationally, Israel’s decision has sparked criticism. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer labeled the government’s decision to seize control of Gaza City as “wrong,” prompting calls for a ceasefire and humanitarian relief. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced Germany’s cessation of military exports for use in Gaza, demanding comprehensive access for aid groups.

Australia’s Foreign Minister Penny Wong urged Israel to consider the humanitarian implications, proposing a two-state solution for peace based on recognized borders. Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur, and Volker Türk, the U.N. high commissioner for human rights, also criticized the decision, highlighting international legal concerns.

The Turkish Foreign Ministry called out the Security Council to act against what it perceives as an unlawful action by Israel, aimed at making Gaza unlivable.

According to NPR, Anas Baba contributed to the report from Gaza City.

Judge Blocks Trump Birthright Citizenship Order Nationwide

A federal judge appointed by President Joe Biden has issued a nationwide injunction against former President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, citing constitutional conflicts.

In a decisive legal move, U.S. District Judge Deborah L. Boardman delivered a ruling that blocks former President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, a directive which had sought to deny citizenship documents to certain groups of children born in the United States. Boardman’s decision, announced Thursday, underscores the provision of the Fourteenth Amendment and contends with existing Supreme Court precedent.

Boardman’s ruling supports a class-action lawsuit filed by the immigration rights group, CASA. The judge determined that the plaintiffs presented a strong case for a class-wide preliminary injunction, arguing that the executive order’s contradiction of the Constitution justified this legal remedy. “The plaintiffs have established that they are likely to succeed on the merits of their constitutional claim,” Boardman elaborated in her opinion.

The injunction aims to prevent the irreparable harm of denying citizenship to the children affected by the executive order. Boardman noted that maintaining the current state of birthright citizenship aligns with public interest and equity considerations, emphasizing that the government’s position would not be adversely affected by upholding the status quo pending the resolution of the lawsuit.

This ruling marks the fourth instance of a federal judge imposing such an injunction on Trump’s executive order, following a Supreme Court ruling in June. Trump’s directive, unveiled at the start of his second term, had insisted that U.S. agencies refuse citizenship documentation to children born to unauthorized immigrants, or those without at least one parent being a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.

Initially, the executive order faced swift challenges from lower courts before progressing to the Supreme Court’s review. In May, the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision addressed the scope of lower courts’ authority to implement nationwide injunctions, rather than directly tackling the executive order’s validity. This prompted a wave of legal responses from various advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and CASA, who adjusted their legal approaches in line with the Court’s guidance on seeking class-action lawsuits.

According to The Washington Post, these developments signal ongoing judicial resistance to changes proposed under the Trump administration concerning citizenship rights.

Indian-Origin CEO Reshma Kewalramani on Fortune’s List with Ambani

Reshma Kewalramani’s remarkable journey from Mumbai to becoming the CEO of Vertex Pharmaceuticals highlights her influence as one of the most powerful and wealthy women of Indian origin in global business.

Reshma Kewalramani, an Indian-origin CEO, stands as a testament to global leadership in biotechnology. Having moved to the United States at the age of 11, she now leads Vertex Pharmaceuticals, a distinguished Fortune 500 biotech company. Kewalramani’s breakthrough career trajectory is marked by her notable rise in the business world, fortified by her academic accomplishments and professional competencies.

Kewalramani, MD, FASN, serves as both the Chief Executive Officer and President of Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Entering the company in 2017, she rapidly ascended the corporate ladder, initially serving as Chief Medical Officer and Executive Vice President of Global Medicines Development before assuming the CEO role in 2020. Her tenure has been transformative, securing approvals for five groundbreaking drugs aimed at treating the root causes of cystic fibrosis (CF), thereby significantly improving the quality of life for numerous patients.

Kewalramani’s educational journey is rooted in medicine, having obtained her medical degree with honors from the seven-year program at the Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine. She further honed her skills, completing both her internship and residency in internal medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital, followed by a fellowship in nephrology as part of the joint program between Mass General and Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Her leadership capabilities were enhanced by completing the General Management Program at Harvard Business School, adding significant value to her diverse skill set.

A recognized Fellow of the American Society of Nephrology, Kewalramani’s contributions to healthcare and leadership have garnered significant recognition. Her inclusion on both the TIME 100 Most Influential People in the World and TIME 100 Health lists underscores her lasting impact and visionary stature in the biotech sector.

Within this elite corporate sphere, she shares global influence with notable leaders such as Jensen Huang, CEO and co-founder of Nvidia, who topped Fortune’s 2025 list of the world’s 100 most powerful businesspeople. Huang, along with other technology titans like Microsoft’s Satya Nadella, Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, Alphabet’s Sundar Pichai, and Huawei’s Ren Zhengfei, epitomizes fierce competition at the pinnacle of corporate leadership, all striving for advancement and innovation.

Source: Original article

Google CEO Pichai on Hiring: Best Employees Are Often Youngsters

Google CEO Sundar Pichai believes that the most effective employees are often their own most severe critics, a viewpoint he shared on a recent podcast, offering insights into his management philosophy and career advice for Generation Z.

In a conversation with Lex Fridman on his podcast, Sundar Pichai, now worth $1.1 billion after ascending to the helm of Google, expressed a distinctive perspective on employee effectiveness. He emphasized that the best workers are frequently those who hold themselves to high standards. “At times, you’re working with people who are so committed to achieving, if they’ve done something wrong, they feel it more than you do,” Pichai noted.

The 52-year-old executive has been pivotal in transforming Google into a towering $2.3 trillion enterprise since he joined as a humble product manager in 2004. He shared insights on how today’s young professionals, particularly those from Generation Z, might navigate their careers for long-term growth.

Pichai’s rise from product manager to CEO was not straightforward. He confessed to experiencing intimidation by peers throughout his career, framing these moments as crucial experiences for personal growth. “At various points in my life, I’ve worked with people who I felt were better than me,” he explained. “You want that feeling a few times, trying to get yourself in a position where you’re working with people who you feel are kind of like stretching your abilities, is what helps you grow.”

For young professionals, Pichai’s advice is clear: embrace discomfort as a tool for unlocking one’s potential. “Put yourself in uncomfortable situations,” he urged, noting that this approach frequently leads to self-discovery and development.

This philosophy not only guided Pichai’s career but also caught the attention of Google’s co-founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, eventually leading to his appointment as CEO in 2015. Rather than making strictly logical career moves, Pichai advises Generation Z to pursue their passions. “When you do things, I think it’s important to listen to your heart, and see whether you actually enjoy doing it,” he advised.

Pichai’s success mantra goes beyond individual achievements to emphasize team dynamics. At Google, success hinges on assembling the right team. “You find mission-oriented people who are in the shared journey, who have this inner drive to excellence, to do the best, and motivate people, and you can achieve a lot that way,” Pichai explained.

This leadership mindset underscores the importance of nurturing a culture of collaboration and motivation, focusing on finding people who align with the company’s mission and embody a commitment to excellence.

According to Times of India, these insights from Pichai offer a glimpse into the principles that have shaped not only his career but also Google’s trajectory in the tech world.

Source: Original article

US Green Card Numbers to Increase Under New Proposal

Lawmakers have introduced the Dignity Act of 2025, a bipartisan proposal aiming to increase green card availability and enact comprehensive immigration reforms.

The Dignity Act of 2025, or H.R. 4393, has been presented in Congress as a new initiative to address ongoing issues within the U.S. immigration system. This proposed legislation seeks to enhance the availability of green cards to immigrants and includes a variety of reforms to address visa backlogs and the legal status of Dreamers while also implementing significant changes to border security and verification rules.

Introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on July 15, 2025, by Representatives Maria Elvira Salazar, a Republican from Florida, and Veronica Escobar, a Democrat from Texas, the bill represents a rare bipartisan effort to tackle immigration reform. The Dignity Act proposes a multitude of border security measures and revisions aimed at expanding access to permanent residency.

The legislation outlines a pathway for those brought to the U.S. as minors and recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) to adjust their status to that of lawful permanent residents. This transition would depend on meeting certain criteria, including graduating from college or a technical school, serving for three years in the U.S. military, or maintaining four years of consistent employment with a valid work permit.

Additionally, the act aims to expedite the legal visa process, targeting a reduction in visa backlogs to a maximum of 10 years. Those who have been waiting in employment or family-based visa backlogs for over a decade would have the option to pay a $20,000 fee for expedited processing. To further alleviate delays, the bill proposes to raise the per-country cap from 7 percent to 15 percent of the annual total for both employment-based and family-sponsored green cards. This increase is intended to ease country-specific bottlenecks that particularly affect applicants from India and China, who currently face extended wait times compared to other nationalities.

The latest figures indicate that approximately 1.17 million people obtained green cards in 2023, marking a 15.2 percent increase from the previous year due to modifications in pandemic restrictions and immigration policy. The majority of these green cards (64.6 percent) were family-sponsored, with employment-based categories accounting for 16.7 percent.

Florida Representative Maria Elvira Salazar emphasized the significance of the Dignity Act, remarking, “The Dignity Act is a revolutionary bill that offers the solution to our immigration crisis: secure the border, stop illegal immigration, and provide an earned opportunity for long-term immigrants to stay here and work. No amnesty. No handouts. No citizenship. Just accountability and a path to stability for our economy and our future.”

In terms of legislative progress, the Dignity Act of 2025 is currently under review by multiple House committees, including the Judiciary and Homeland Security, as it moves forward in the legislative process.

Source: Original article

Trump Proposes 50% Tariff on India Amid Russian Oil Tensions

President Donald Trump has introduced significant tariffs on India, escalating trade tensions and targeting the country’s oil trade with Russia.

President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday the implementation of sweeping tariffs on India, one of the United States’ key trading partners. A 25% tariff will be enforced starting Thursday, with an additional 25% tariff set to be imposed later this month. The new tariffs are intended as a punitive measure against India for its imports of Russian oil and gas.

These combined tariffs will bring the total duty on goods imported from India to a substantial 50%, placing it among the highest percentages charged by the U.S. on foreign imports. The executive order detailing this move was published on the White House website, highlighting an escalation in Trump’s trade conflict with New Delhi and marking the first use of secondary sanctions on nations accused of supporting Russia’s military efforts.

The order claims India is actively importing oil from the Russian Federation and states that it is “necessary and appropriate” to impose the new 25% tariff on Indian products. This new set of tariffs related to Russia will come into effect in 21 days, while the initial 25% tariff will be enforced starting Thursday.

Trump cited intelligence from senior officials regarding Russian activities in Ukraine as justification for the new duties. His announcement followed a recent meeting between Trump’s foreign envoy, Steve Witkoff, and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow.

Earlier in the week, Trump had threatened India with these new tariffs, accusing the country of aiding Russia’s war efforts in Ukraine. “India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don’t care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine,” Trump expressed on social media.

In response to the tariff increase, India defended its purchase of Russian oil. A statement released by India’s Ministry of External Affairs emphasized that oil imports are driven by market factors, aimed at ensuring the energy security of India’s 1.4 billion population. The statement described the U.S. tariffs as “extremely unfortunate” and hinted at potential retaliatory measures, indicating that India “will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests.”

The imposition of a 50% tariff on Indian goods could have significant impacts. The U.S. trade deficit with India has nearly doubled since Trump’s first term, largely due to increased import levels from both countries. The shift in trade patterns came amid Trump’s increasing tariffs on China, which were maintained during former President Joe Biden’s tenure, prompting U.S. businesses to explore alternative production sites like India.

Several American companies, such as Apple, have relocated much of their production to India in recent years. Notably, smartphones are exempt from both the tariffs set to take effect Thursday and the additional 25% tariff coming later this month.

Last year, U.S. imports from India totaled $87 billion, while India imported $42 billion worth of goods from the U.S., according to the Commerce Department. The primary imports from India included pharmaceuticals, communications equipment like smartphones, and apparel. Trump had previously threatened an across-the-board tariff on pharmaceuticals, but this would not be in addition to the 50% tariff on Indian goods if enforced.

Conversely, the U.S. exports significant amounts of oil, gas, chemicals, and aerospace products to India. If India enacts retaliatory tariffs, these American industries could face adverse effects.

The newly imposed tariffs and potential trade restrictions underscore increasing tensions between the U.S. and India, potentially reshaping the economic landscape between these two major global economies.

H-1B Workers Issued Notices Despite 60-Day Grace Period

H-1B visa holders who have faced employment termination are receiving Notices to Appear from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, raising concerns over the enforcement of the 60-day grace period.

H-1B beneficiaries are encountering complexities as U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issues Notices to Appear, despite the supposed protection granted by the 60-day grace period following employment separation. These charging documents instruct the affected foreign workers to appear before an immigration judge, initiating removal proceedings based on specified legal grounds and allegations.

According to the rules governing the H-1B visa, if a worker’s employment ends, either voluntarily or involuntarily, they, alongside their dependents, are required to leave the United States within 60 days or by the end of their visa’s authorized validity period, depending on which is shorter. This grace period allows nonimmigrant workers to pursue a change in nonimmigrant status or adjust their status without having to immediately exit the country. The objective is to provide these individuals a window to maintain their lawful status or seek new employment opportunities within the United States.

However, despite the protective intent of the 60-day rule, some H-1B visa holders have been receiving Notices to Appear, prompting significant concern among foreign workers in the United States. The regulations state that nonimmigrant employees should not be deemed as having failed to maintain their status solely because their employment ceased, within the stipulated timeline. Yet, the discretionary power granted under these regulations to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appears to complicate this assurance.

The relevant provisions also state that DHS has the authority to eliminate or reduce the 60-day grace period as a discretionary measure. During this period, foreign workers are not permitted to engage in employment unless explicitly authorized. These considerations are crucial for H-1B visa holders who are between jobs or planning career transitions in the U.S., especially in light of changes implemented by the previous administration under President Trump.

Such developments have emphasized the need for H-1B visa holders to be acutely aware of the evolving regulations and potential uncertainties they might face in maintaining their immigration status. According to NAFSA: Association of International Educators, the dynamic regulatory environment necessitates vigilance and proactive planning by affected individuals.

OpenAI Provides ChatGPT to Federal Agencies for $1 Yearly

OpenAI will offer its ChatGPT service to federal agencies for $1 a year in a new partnership with the General Services Administration (GSA).

OpenAI announced on Tuesday that it will provide its artificial intelligence (AI) model, ChatGPT, to federal agencies for a nominal fee of $1 per year. This initiative is part of a new partnership with the General Services Administration (GSA).

The announcement followed the GSA’s decision to add OpenAI’s AI model to its government purchasing system. This update also includes options for Google’s Gemini and Anthropic’s Claude, expanding the AI tools available to federal agencies.

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, emphasized the importance of making AI accessible to public servants. “One of the best ways to make sure AI works for everyone is to put it in the hands of the people serving the country,” he stated in a press release.

Altman further noted, “We’re proud to partner with the General Services Administration, delivering on President Trump’s AI Action Plan, to make ChatGPT available across the federal government, helping public servants deliver for the American people.”

This initiative offers participating federal agencies access to ChatGPT Enterprise at the symbolic price of $1 for the coming year. Additionally, these agencies will receive 60 days of unlimited access to more advanced ChatGPT features. OpenAI highlighted its commitment to security, reassuring users that data inputs and outputs would not be used to train its models.

Similarly, Anthropic is reportedly planning to provide its models to government agencies for just $1, according to Axios. Such efforts align with a broader governmental push to integrate advanced AI models more comprehensively, spurred by President Trump’s recent AI framework.

The AI framework announced last month calls for an accelerated adoption of AI technology by the government. Part of this plan includes the establishment of an AI procurement toolbox to be managed by the GSA. This toolbox will enable government agencies to select from a variety of AI models while remaining compliant with privacy, data governance, and transparency laws.

India Wins Oval Thriller, Series Drawn Against England in Cricket

India clinched a thrilling victory by six runs in the fifth Test against England, with Mohammed Siraj playing a pivotal role by securing nine wickets, including five in the second innings.

India emerged victorious in a nail-biting finish against England in the fifth Test, underscored by a remarkable performance from fast bowler Mohammed Siraj. Siraj, who took a total of nine wickets in the match, was instrumental on the final day, particularly with five dismissals in the second innings, helping India defeat England by six runs.

The match, which concluded dramatically, commenced on the fifth day with India playing aggressively. Siraj and his teammate Prasidh Krishna struck early to keep the game finely balanced. Ultimately, it was Siraj who took the decisive last wicket, ensuring a hard-fought win for India.

England, chasing a challenging target of 374, found themselves at 339/6 by the close of the fourth day’s evening session, as bad lighting and rain halted play prematurely. Resuming the following day, India quickly wrapped up the remaining English wickets, resulting in England’s second innings concluding at 367 in 85.1 overs.

This victory significantly bolstered India’s standings in the World Test Championship (WTC) table, presenting them with an advantageous position, given their relatively uncomplicated schedule for the ongoing cycle.

The toss saw England opt to bowl first, setting the competitive tone for the match between the two cricketing giants.

The series prior to this fifth Test witnessed fluctuating fortunes for both teams. The results were as follows: England claimed the first Test at Headingley in Leeds by five wickets while India bounced back with a staggering 336-run win in the second Test at Edgbaston, Birmingham. The third Test at Lords saw England win by a narrow margin of 22 runs, and the fourth Test at Emirates Old Trafford in Manchester ended in a draw.

The playing XI for India included Yashasvi Jaiswal, KL Rahul, Sai Sudharsan, captain Shubman Gill, Karun Nair, Ravindra Jadeja, wicketkeeper Dhruv Jurel, Washington Sundar, Akash Deep, Prasidh Krishna, and Mohammed Siraj.

England’s team comprised Zak Crawley, Ben Duckett, captain Ollie Pope, Joe Root, Harry Brook, Jacob Bethell, wicketkeeper Jamie Smith, Chris Woakes, Gus Atkinson, Jamie Overton, and Josh Tongue.

The keenly contested series now paves the way for more exciting cricket as both teams continue to showcase prowess on international platforms.

Policy enhancements aim to prevent aliens who are males from being authorized to participate in women’s sports in the United States

WASHINGTON— U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is issuing guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual in alignment with Executive Order 14201, Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports, which directs the Department of Homeland Security to develop policies to prevent the entry of male athletes seeking to compete in women’s sports. USCIS will affirmatively protect all-female athletic opportunities by granting certain athlete-related petitions and applications, that had previously been abused and offered to men, only to women, ensuring that male aliens seeking immigration benefits aren’t coming to the U.S. to participate in women’s sports.

USCIS has clarified eligibility for certain visa categories: O-1A aliens of extraordinary ability, E11 aliens of extraordinary ability, E21 aliens of exceptional ability, and for national interest waivers (NIWs), to guarantee an even playing field for all women’s athletics in the United States.

“Men do not belong in women’s sports. USCIS is closing the loophole for foreign male athletes whose only chance at winning elite sports is to change their gender identity and leverage their biological advantages against women,” said USCIS Spokesperson Matthew Tragesser. “It’s a matter of safety, fairness, respect, and truth that only female athletes receive a visa to come to the U.S. to participate in women’s sports. The Trump Administration is standing up for the silent majority who’ve long been victims of leftist policies that defy common sense.”

This policy update clarifies that USCIS considers the fact that a male athlete has been competing against women as a negative factor in determining whether the alien is among the small percentage at the very top of the field; USCIS does not consider a male athlete who has gained acclaim in men’s sports and seeks to compete in women’s sports in the United States to be seeking to continue work in his area of extraordinary ability; male athletes seeking to enter the country to compete in women’s sports do not substantially benefit the United States; and it is not in the national interest to the United States to waive the job offer and, thus, the labor certification requirement for male athletes whose proposed endeavor is to compete in women’s sports.

The guidance, in Volumes 2 and 6 of the USCIS Policy Manual, is effective immediately and applies to benefit requests pending or filed on or after the publication date, is controlling, and supersedes any related prior guidance.

For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow us on X (formerly Twitter)InstagramYouTubeFacebook and LinkedIn.

US to Revoke Student Visas for Class, Program Absences

The U.S. government has cautioned international students that failing to comply with student visa regulations could result in the revocation of their visas and disqualification from future U.S. visa applications.

The United States has issued a stern warning to international students, emphasizing the significant repercussions of violating student visa standards. This advisory was disseminated via the official X handle of the U.S. Mission in Nigeria on Monday. The warning underscores that students who fail to attend classes, drop out, or exit their academic programs without duly informing their educational institutions may face the revocation of their U.S. student visas.

Moreover, these violations could also lead to disqualification from obtaining future U.S. visas, according to the message. The U.S. Mission strongly advised all student visa holders to comply strictly with the terms of their visas. Maintaining academic status and adhering to regulations are crucial to prevent any immigration complications.

The advisory clearly stated the importance of keeping educational institutions informed of any changes in academic status. It read, “If you drop out, skip classes, or leave your programs of study without informing your school, your student visa may be revoked, and you may lose eligibility for future U.S. visas.”

The U.S. government urges students to “always adhere to the terms of your visa and maintain your student status to avoid any issues,” highlighting the importance of compliance with visa regulations for international students in the United States.

This advisory serves as a reminder for the thousands of international students studying in the U.S. who rely on their student visas to continue their education. It is essential for these students to understand and fulfil all conditions attached to their visa status to prevent any unforeseen immigration issues that could impede their academic pursuits.

According to Punch, these directives form part of broader measures to ensure that international students in the United States adhere to the stipulations of their visa agreements.

Indian-American Returns to US, Cites India’s Reality in Viral Post

Dr. Rajeshwari Iyer’s return to India ended with disappointment over societal issues, prompting her to move back to the U.S., sparking diverse reactions online.

Dr. Rajeshwari Iyer, a respected alumna of the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay and the National Institute of Technology Puducherry, recently recounted her mixed experiences upon returning to India from the United States. Originally, she returned home with a strong desire to rebuild her life and contribute to her homeland, an aspiration that she hoped would bridge the gap between her expectations and reality.

In a post that quickly went viral on social media platform X, Dr. Iyer expressed her disillusionment with what she termed as the “ground reality” in India. She articulated her concerns over societal attitudes, highlighting issues such as high taxes, unchecked corruption, and what she perceived as a lack of meritocracy. “I used to find it funny when people said – ‘The end goal of every Indian is to leave India,’” she reflected in her post.

Dr. Iyer shared that her initial return from the United States was fueled by a sense of purpose and belief in contributing positively to her country. However, she felt let down by what she described as a society that often defends poor decisions and neglects fundamental problems. Eventually, she decided to return to the U.S., stating, “I’ve never felt more at peace.”

Despite the disappointment, Dr. Iyer emphasized that India holds a special place in her heart. Nonetheless, she revealed a reluctance to raise her children in what she called “an environment of hate, noise, and wilful ignorance.”

Her candid revelations ignited a range of responses online. Some users supported her decision as valid and highly personal. One user empathized with her choice, saying that prioritizing peace for family life needs no justification. They remarked, “Some of us stayed… and we’re trying. One small battle at a time.”

Conversely, some questioned her departure, suggesting that leaving might not resolve the issues she initially intended to tackle. A user questioned, “How far will we keep running? We need people like you to stay and fight.” Another person challenged her viewpoint, saying, “If your parents thought like you, you would not have known the wonder that is India… Your kids would be fine too. Stop with the obsession of perfection.”

Others acknowledged that imperfections exist in every country, but highlighted the “resilience” and “spirit” that make residing in India worthwhile. A user presented an introspective take on the situation, offering questions and empathy: “My sympathies are with you, and I can understand the challenges you faced. I have a few questions, if you’d be willing to answer honestly: What was the condition of India when you first went abroad? What were your expectations from Bharat when you returned? Have you noticed any changes during this period? I’d love to hear your perspective. Take care!”

Despite the variety of reactions, Dr. Rajeshwari Iyer remains steadfast in her decision, valuing her newfound clarity. For now, her choice for peace leads her back to the U.S., away from the country she once hoped to help reshape.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai Addresses IT Layoffs with Employees

Google CEO Sundar Pichai has urged employees to do more as the tech giant navigates challenges brought on by widespread layoffs in the IT industry, primarily due to artificial intelligence advancements and economic uncertainties.

Amid a bleak outlook for the global IT sector, Google CEO Sundar Pichai has issued a directive to his workforce with a simple but significant message: “I think we have to accomplish more.” This statement was made in an internal town hall meeting and reiterated through a company-wide memo directed at Google’s employees worldwide, emphasizing the need for increased productivity, innovation, and responsible corporate behavior.

Pichai’s communication emerges at a pivotal time for Google and its parent company, Alphabet, both of which are facing increasing competition in emerging fields such as artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud services. These challenges are compounded by broader economic pressures prompting major firms to reconsider and restructure their human capital.

In his message to employees, Pichai underscored the expectation that “The world is looking to Google for leadership and responsible innovation.” He urged employees to push their limits, work more smartly, and elevate the standards of success. Google aims to channel its resources strategically into areas considered key for future growth. These priorities include making substantial investments in AI, developing cutting-edge climate technology, and creating next-generation search experiences.

Pichai highlighted the importance of speeding up execution to rapidly convert ideas into tangible outcomes. He insisted on optimizing internal operations, eliminating redundancies, and enhancing collective team productivity by reviewing projects to ascertain their alignment with Google’s strategic targets.

Moreover, Brian Saluzzo, a leading figure at Google, stressed the importance of equipping software engineers with advanced tools to make “everybody at Google be more AI-savvy.” This involves integrating AI into coding processes to address leading needs and accelerate development timelines.

To support these initiatives, Saluzzo mentioned the creation of a robust suite of AI products designed for employees to facilitate faster progress. A focal point of this development is a platform called “AI Savvy Google,” which acts as a central resource hub. It offers diverse resources, including specialized courses, practical toolkits, and engaging learning sessions, to help employees better navigate the AI landscape.

According to Financial Express, these moves reflect Google’s proactive approach to maintaining its competitive edge while adapting to rapidly evolving technological and economic landscapes.

Sara Tendulkar Named Brand Ambassador for Australia Tourism

Sara Tendulkar, daughter of famed cricketer Sachin Tendulkar, has been named a brand ambassador for Australia’s new tourism initiative, the “Come and Say G’day” campaign.

Sara Tendulkar, daughter of legendary Indian cricketer Sachin Tendulkar, has been appointed as a brand ambassador for the Australian government’s ambitious tourism campaign, “Come and Say G’day.” This announcement marks a significant move by the Australian Tourism Ministry to revitalize its global tourism efforts.

The campaign, with a substantial investment of $130 million, is designed to lure international travelers to experience the diverse attractions that Australia offers. Initially, it will launch in China on August 7, with plans to expand into other significant international markets by the year’s end.

Among the intriguing elements of the “Come and Say G’day” campaign is its eclectic mix of brand ambassadors and mascots intended to resonate with a broad spectrum of global audiences. Ruby the Roo, the campaign’s original mascot, will be joined by a cast of international figures to create unique tourism invitations tailored to each target market.

Phillipa Harrison, Managing Director of Australian Tourism, expressed enthusiasm about Sara Tendulkar’s role, noting her status as an “entrepreneur and philanthropist” and her appeal to the Indian audience. Besides Tendulkar, the campaign will feature Australian wildlife conservationist Robert Irwin, son of the late Steve Irwin, for the U.S. market.

In the United Kingdom, the campaign spotlights food writer and television chef Nigella Lawson. Other personalities include actor Yosh Yu in China and Japanese comedian Abareru-kun. Additionally, Australian actor Thomas Weatherall will appear in the new series of advertisements.

Harrison highlighted that these international stars, combined with local Australian talent, are expected to craft tailor-made invitations for five major markets, each showcasing the unique tourism offerings travelers seek.

This latest effort is the second chapter of the “Come and Say G’day” campaign, which initially launched in October 2022. Spanning the next two years, this new phase brings the total investment by the Australian federal government in the campaign to $255 million since its inception.

This initiative reflects Australia’s commitment to boosting its tourism industry by engaging globally recognized personalities and creating culturally relevant marketing strategies to appeal to diverse audiences.

Source: Original article

Putin and Netanyahu Challenge Trump on Global Stage

President Trump is facing increasing challenges from Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, complicating his foreign policy efforts as both leaders remain steadfast in their controversial actions.

President Donald Trump finds himself mired in complex relations with two longstanding and sometimes contentious partners: Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Both leaders have added layers of difficulty to Trump’s global strategy, primarily due to their continued aggressive actions against Ukraine and Palestinians, respectively, and their reluctance to alter course.

The most pronounced shift in Trump’s attitude is toward Putin, who has ignored Trump’s calls to end the conflict in Ukraine, which began with Russia’s invasion in February 2022. Trump recently announced the deployment of two nuclear submarines to unspecified regions, a move prompted by what he described as “highly provocative statements” from Moscow. This escalation follows his tightening deadline for a ceasefire, mentioned during a trip to Scotland, from an indeterminate time frame to “10 or 12 days.”

However, Moscow appeared dismissive, with a Kremlin spokesperson declaring that Russia had developed “a certain immunity” to such threats. This scenario marks a significant departure from the atmosphere in February, when Trump and Vice President Vance criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office for alleged ingratitude towards American aid.

Trump’s rhetoric has shifted, distancing from earlier comments suggesting Ukraine’s culpability for the war. In recent months, Trump expressed frustration with Putin, noting that seemingly cordial interactions often preceded aggressive Russian actions against Ukraine.

“We get a lot of bulls‑‑‑ thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,” Trump remarked in early July. “He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.”

One underlying reason for Trump’s frustration could be the political quagmire Putin’s steadfastness creates for his administration, especially after Trump pledged during his campaign that he could resolve the conflict within 24 hours—a promise that remains unfulfilled.

Despite his frustrations, Trump seems unlikely to abandon his long-held skepticism about U.S. support for Ukraine, creating a political stalemate where the war neither ends nor sees dramatic U.S.-backed progress for Ukraine.

Similar complexities arise in Trump’s dealings with Netanyahu, though the specifics differ. While Trump has historically maintained a strong pro-Israel stance, evident in his first-term decisions like moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem and crafting a highly pro-Israel peace plan, his relationship with Netanyahu has been more volatile.

The tension heightened after Netanyahu recognized former President Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election, leading Trump to criticize Netanyahu for allegedly retreating from a joint operation with the U.S. to kill Qassem Soleimani, the head of Iran’s Quds Force, in January 2020.

“Bibi Netanyahu let us down,” Trump commented in late 2023.

While Trump continues to push pro-Israel policies in his second term, his tone varies significantly. He has both encouraged and seemed indifferent to Israeli ceasefires, and most recently, he countered Netanyahu’s denial of starvation in Gaza, citing footage suggesting children in Gaza appeared hungry.

In a recent move, Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited a Gaza aid distribution center run by the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, to “help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza,” highlighting a nuanced approach amidst broader support concerns for Israel from the U.S. right.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s comments branding Israeli actions in Gaza as “genocide,” alongside critical opinions from influential conservative figures like Tucker Carlson, Theo Von, and Joe Rogan, indicate a shift within Trump’s base that could influence future Middle East policies.

Netanyahu, meanwhile, remains focused on broader war goals, including hostage release and “total victory.” His coalition’s hard-line stance and personal legal challenges, such as delaying his corruption trial, further complicate U.S.-Israel diplomatic dynamics.

While Trump holds leverage through significant U.S. aid to Israel, whether he will apply pressure is uncertain. For now, interactions with both Putin and Netanyahu suggest continued entanglements that challenge Trump’s foreign policy ambitions.

Source: Original article

AICU demands release of Nuns in Chhattisgarh, condemns Rising Tide of Anti-Christian Violence in India

The 106 year old All India Catholic Union condemns the unjust arrest of two Catholic nuns, Sister Preetha
Mary and Sister Vandana Francis of the Assisi Sisters of Mary Immaculate (ASMI), and their Tribal aide
Sukhman Mandavi in Chhattisgarh on July 25, 2025 and demands their immediate and unconditional release.
The arrests, coupled with the refusal of bail by multiple courts, the involvement of the National Investigation
Agency (NIA), and the complicity of state authorities with anti-Christian elements linked to the Sangh Parivar,
represents a grave assault on religious freedom, minority rights, and the secular fabric of India, AICU
president Engr. Elias Vaz said.

The severity of the pan Indian hate campaign in the last few years by members of the ruling Bharatiya Janata
party and its allies in the Sangh Parivar can be gauged by the fact that that a Maharashtra BJP legislator
Gopichand Padalkar is offering Rs 5 Lakh [ $5,756 USD), to anyone for “thrashing a missionary, the second
one to be given Rs 4 lakh, while the third one to be given Rs 3 lakh as prizes.”

The arrest of Sisters Preetha Mary and Vandana Francis is a shameful chapter in India’s history, reflecting the
erosion of constitutional values and the rise of communal forces that threaten the nation’s secular identity. The
Christian community, which has made immense contributions to education, healthcare, and social welfare,
deserves respect and protection, not persecution.

Sisters Preetha Mary and Vandana Francis were arrested at Durg Railway Station in Chhattisgarh by the
Government Railway Police, based on baseless allegations of human trafficking and forced religious
conversion.

The nuns were accompanying three young Christian women, all over 18 years of age, who were traveling to
Agra for employment opportunities at a convent-run institution. These women carried written consent letters
from their families, clearly indicating their voluntary decision to seek work. The girls attested they we’re
Christians and were travelling at their volition but were being coerced to speak against the nuns.
A women Sangh member, Jyoti Sharma, was filmed attacking the nuns while they were in the railway police
station where the constables were witness to the attack.

Members of the Bajrang Dal, the youth wing of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and a key affiliate of the
Sangh Parivar, staged a disruptive protest at the railway station, falsely accusing the nuns of trafficking and
conversion.

The refusal of bail by both the Lower Court and the Sessions Court in Durg, followed by the transfer of the
case to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Court in Bilaspur, is a disturbing escalation that underscores
the politicization of the legal system. On July 30, 2025, Judge Aneesh Dubey of the Sessions Court ruled that
the case falls under the purview of the NIA due to the human trafficking charges, effectively delaying justice
and prolonging the nuns’ detention.

The involvement of the NIA, an agency typically tasked with handling terrorism-related cases, in a matter
involving baseless allegations against two nuns is both disproportionate and alarming. It suggests a deliberate
attempt to intimidate and suppress the Christian community by framing their legitimate activities as national security threats. This misuse of legal mechanisms to target minorities must be condemned in the strongest
terms.

The arrest of the nuns has sparked widespread protests across India, reflecting the deep sense of injustice
felt by citizens from all walks of life, in Kerala, the nuns’ home state.

The protests have extended beyond Kerala to Delhi, Bangalore, and other major cities.

On July 28 and 30, 2025, Members of Parliament from both the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) and the
opposition United Democratic Front (UDF) in Kerala staged demonstrations outside Parliament. Kerala Chief
Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, in a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, described the arrests as a “blatant
display of the Sangh Parivar’s real character” and demanded immediate intervention to ensure justice.

The arrest of the nuns is a stark reminder of the escalating anti-Christian violence in India, particularly in BJPruled states. According to the United Christian Forum, attacks against Christians have risen dramatically, from
127 incidents in 2014 to 834 over the past decade. In 2025 alone, the Christian community has faced
relentless persecution, including vandalism of churches, harassment of clergy, and disruption of religious
services.

States like Chhattisgarh, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha have become hotspots for such
violence, with Sangh Parivar affiliates acting with impunity under the protection of state governments.

The misuse of anti-conversion laws, such as the Chhattisgarh Religious Freedom Act, 1968, has become a
tool to target Christians, with vague provisions allowing for the harassment of missionaries and institutions.
The brutal killing of Graham Staines and his sons in Odisha in 1999 and the destruction of churches in
Gujarat’s Dang district are grim reminders of the Sangh Parivar’s history of violence against Christians.

We call for the following actions to address this grave injustice and the broader issue of anti-Christian violence
in India:

1. Immediate Release of the Nuns: The government must ensure the unconditional release of Sisters
Preetha Mary, Vandana Francis, and Sukhman Mandavi, and drop all charges against them.
2. Independent Investigation: An impartial inquiry must be conducted into the role of Bajrang Dal
activists and the complicity of the Chhattisgarh police in this incident.
3. Repeal of Anti-Conversion Laws: Draconian laws that enable the targeting of minorities must be
repealed to protect religious freedom.
4. Protection for Minorities: The Central and state governments must take concrete measures to curb
religious fanaticism and prevent mob violence against Christians and other minorities.

Catholic Union demands release of Nuns in Chhattisgarh and condemns Rising Tide of Anti-Christian Violence in India

ALL INDIA CATHOLIC UNION
Founded in 1919, Registered under Societies Registration Act 1850
Representing the Catholic Laity of India through 120 Diocesan Units Nation-wide
AICU ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, D. T. C. BUILDING, 6TH FLOOR, OFFICE NO.604 A, EDC COMPLEX, PATTO, PANAJI, GOA –
403001
Date: August 1, 2025
Press statement
AICU demands release of Nuns in Chhattisgarh, condemns Rising Tide of Anti-Christian Violence in India

The 106 year old All India Catholic Union condemns the unjust arrest of two Catholic nuns, Sister Preetha
Mary and Sister Vandana Francis of the Assisi Sisters of Mary Immaculate (ASMI), and their Tribal aide
Sukhman Mandavi in Chhattisgarh on July 25, 2025 and demands their immediate and unconditional release.
The arrests, coupled with the refusal of bail by multiple courts, the involvement of the National Investigation
Agency (NIA), and the complicity of state authorities with anti-Christian elements linked to the Sangh Parivar,
represents a grave assault on religious freedom, minority rights, and the secular fabric of India, AICU
president Engr. Elias Vaz said.
The severity of the pan Indian hate campaign in the last few years by members of the ruling Bharatiya Janata
party and its allies in the Sangh Parivar can be gauged by the fact that that a Maharashtra BJP legislator
Gopichand Padalkar is offering Rs 5 Lakh [ $5,756 USD), to anyone for “thrashing a missionary, the second
one to be given Rs 4 lakh, while the third one to be given Rs 3 lakh as prizes.”
The arrest of Sisters Preetha Mary and Vandana Francis is a shameful chapter in India’s history, reflecting the
erosion of constitutional values and the rise of communal forces that threaten the nation’s secular identity. The
Christian community, which has made immense contributions to education, healthcare, and social welfare,
deserves respect and protection, not persecution.
Sisters Preetha Mary and Vandana Francis were arrested at Durg Railway Station in Chhattisgarh by the
Government Railway Police, based on baseless allegations of human trafficking and forced religious
conversion.
The nuns were accompanying three young Christian women, all over 18 years of age, who were traveling to
Agra for employment opportunities at a convent-run institution. These women carried written consent letters
from their families, clearly indicating their voluntary decision to seek work. The girls attested they we’re
Christians and were travelling at their volition but were being coerced to speak against the nuns.
A women Sangh member, Jyoti Sharma, was filmed attacking the nuns while they were in the railway police
station where the constables were witness to the attack.
Members of the Bajrang Dal, the youth wing of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and a key affiliate of the
Sangh Parivar, staged a disruptive protest at the railway station, falsely accusing the nuns of trafficking and
conversion.
The refusal of bail by both the Lower Court and the Sessions Court in Durg, followed by the transfer of the
case to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Court in Bilaspur, is a disturbing escalation that underscores
the politicization of the legal system. On July 30, 2025, Judge Aneesh Dubey of the Sessions Court ruled that
the case falls under the purview of the NIA due to the human trafficking charges, effectively delaying justice
and prolonging the nuns’ detention.
The involvement of the NIA, an agency typically tasked with handling terrorism-related cases, in a matter
involving baseless allegations against two nuns is both disproportionate and alarming. It suggests a deliberate
attempt to intimidate and suppress the Christian community by framing their legitimate activities as national
Administrative Office: DTC Building, 6th Floor, 604 A,EDC Complex, Patto Plaza, Panaji, Goa – 403001
Tel: (0832) 2437026 Email: aicufile@yahoo.com

ALL INDIA CATHOLIC UNION
Founded in 1919, Registered under Societies Registration Act 1850
Representing the Catholic Laity of India through 120 Diocesan Units Nation-wide
AICU ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, D. T. C. BUILDING, 6TH FLOOR, OFFICE NO.604 A, EDC COMPLEX, PATTO, PANAJI, GOA –
403001
security threats. This misuse of legal mechanisms to target minorities must be condemned in the strongest
terms.

The arrest of the nuns has sparked widespread protests across India, reflecting the deep sense of injustice
felt by citizens from all walks of life, in Kerala, the nuns’ home state.
The protests have extended beyond Kerala to Delhi, Bangalore, and other major cities.
On July 28 and 30, 2025, Members of Parliament from both the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) and the
opposition United Democratic Front (UDF) in Kerala staged demonstrations outside Parliament. Kerala Chief
Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, in a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, described the arrests as a “blatant
display of the Sangh Parivar’s real character” and demanded immediate intervention to ensure justice.
The arrest of the nuns is a stark reminder of the escalating anti-Christian violence in India, particularly in BJP
ruled states. According to the United Christian Forum, attacks against Christians have risen dramatically, from
127 incidents in 2014 to 834 over the past decade. In 2025 alone, the Christian community has faced
relentless persecution, including vandalism of churches, harassment of clergy, and disruption of religious
services.
States like Chhattisgarh, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha have become hotspots for such
violence, with Sangh Parivar affiliates acting with impunity under the protection of state governments.
The misuse of anti-conversion laws, such as the Chhattisgarh Religious Freedom Act, 1968, has become a
tool to target Christians, with vague provisions allowing for the harassment of missionaries and institutions.
The brutal killing of Graham Staines and his sons in Odisha in 1999 and the destruction of churches in
Gujarat’s Dang district are grim reminders of the Sangh Parivar’s history of violence against Christians.
We call for the following actions to address this grave injustice and the broader issue of anti-Christian violence
in India:
1. Immediate Release of the Nuns: The government must ensure the unconditional release of Sisters
Preetha Mary, Vandana Francis, and Sukhman Mandavi, and drop all charges against them.

2. Independent Investigation: An impartial inquiry must be conducted into the role of Bajrang Dal
activists and the complicity of the Chhattisgarh police in this incident.

3. Repeal of Anti-Conversion Laws: Draconian laws that enable the targeting of minorities must be
repealed to protect religious freedom.

4. Protection for Minorities: The Central and state governments must take concrete measures to curb
religious fanaticism and prevent mob violence against Christians and other minorities.
Released to the Media for publication. For any details, please contact the Official Spokesman, Dr John Dayal,
+91 9811021072; john.dayal@gmail.com
_____
Administrative Office: DTC Building, 6th Floor, 604 A,EDC Complex, Patto Plaza, Panaji, Goa – 403001

Modi Faces Challenges from Trump’s Tariffs and Remarks

U.S. President Donald Trump’s introduction of steep tariffs on India, alongside his criticisms of its economy and overtures to Pakistan, have placed Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a challenging political position.

Recent developments in international trade and diplomacy have significantly impacted India’s political landscape, focusing attention on Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Trump’s recent tariffs on Indian goods, coupled with his unfavorable remarks about India’s economy, have posed distinct challenges for Modi, separate from the broader national implications.

Modi, who has worked hard to present himself as a global statesman with close ties to influential world leaders, particularly in the United States, finds this carefully cultivated image under threat. The tariffs and Trump’s public criticism undermine Modi’s portrayal as a leader who can safeguard Indian interests on the global stage. Additionally, China’s persistent pressure without concessions adds to Modi’s burden, weakening his political image at home where foreign visits have been a tool to project his influence.

Opposition parties in India have seized on Trump’s critique of the Indian economy, labeling it “dead,” to challenge Modi’s economic strategies and foreign relations efforts. They argue that Modi’s previous support for Trump has backfired, leaving India diplomatically sidelined and economically vulnerable. This view is amplified by Modi’s recent omission of Trump’s name in a Lok Sabha speech, despite opposition leader Rahul Gandhi’s challenge to address the issue. This omission is used by political adversaries to portray Modi as reluctant to oppose the U.S. president, providing further fuel for criticism at a time when intra-party challenges are also emerging, particularly concerning the election of a new BJP president.

The economic repercussions of the U.S. tariffs are considerable. They pose risks to India’s export competitiveness, investor confidence, and Modi’s ambitious plans to attract global manufacturing to India. Affected sectors include labor-intensive industries like textiles, jewelry, and electronics, which may experience significant job losses. These developments threaten Modi’s narrative of transforming India into a global economic powerhouse, possibly endangering his vision of lifting India to the status of the world’s fourth-largest economy. Further complications could arise if the U.S. imposes penalties related to India’s policy towards Russia, potentially leading to higher energy prices and increased fiscal deficits.

Trump’s actions regarding Pakistan further complicate the situation for Modi. By equating India and Pakistan, Trump undermines Modi’s efforts to position India as a dominant regional power juxtaposed with its neighbors. This perceived American tilt towards Pakistan disrupts the nationalist rhetoric that is central to Modi’s support base, which values India’s independent global stature.

The sudden imposition of tariffs by Trump, notably higher than those encountered by other Asian economies, signals a disregard for prior diplomatic engagements, including Modi’s attempts to maintain amicable relations with the U.S. This abrupt policy shift leaves New Delhi with limited options, potentially requiring difficult concessions that could further negatively impact the economy.

As Modi grapples with these international challenges, his long-standing governance comes under scrutiny, with nowhere to deflect responsibility for the economic downturn. The situation marks a pivotal moment in Modi’s tenure, as foundational aspects of his political strength and domestic appeal are directly confronted by external forces.

Ultimately, Trump’s current diplomatic stance affects not only India but also directly challenges Modi’s political leadership and brand, presenting significant hurdles in his eleventh year in office, according to The Wire.

VFS Global Opens 8 New Indian Consular Centers in U.S.

The Indian Mission in the United States and VFS Global have announced the inauguration of eight new Indian Consular Application Centres (ICACs) in major U.S. cities, significantly expanding service accessibility for the 5.3 million Indian diaspora.

The Indian Mission in the United States and VFS Global, a leader in trusted technology services, have unveiled eight new Indian Consular Application Centres (ICACs) in the cities of Boston, Columbus, Dallas, Detroit, Edison, Orlando, Raleigh, and San Jose. This expansion brings the total number of ICACs in the United States to 16, enhancing service accessibility for the Indian diaspora and other applicants across the country.

A further expansion is planned with the opening of another ICAC in Los Angeles scheduled for August, which will increase the total number of centers nationwide to 17. These centers are vital, providing a range of essential services such as India Visa application, Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI), passport application, renunciation of Indian citizenship, Police clearance certificate, Global Entry Programme (GEP), and various miscellaneous/attestation services.

VFS Global remains the exclusive service provider for these important functions on behalf of the Government of India in the United States. The newly launched ICACs are part of a broader initiative to streamline the application process with several enhancements.

The enhancements include ICACs remaining open on Saturdays, offering greater flexibility for applicants. Additionally, return courier services are now part of the standard service fees. Basic amenities like photographs, photocopies, and form filling will be available at no extra cost. A broader range of consular services will also be accessible, improving overall convenience for applicants.

The Ambassador of India to the United States, Vinay Mohan Kwatra, highlighted the importance of the new centers, stating, “We are very happy to announce the opening of eight new Indian Consular Application Centres. With the opening of these centers, our presence to deliver extensive consular services will expand significantly, making them more accessible and faster for the vibrant Indian diaspora.”

The new ICACs are anticipated to benefit the Indian community within the consular jurisdiction of the Indian Consulate in cities like Atlanta, Chicago, Houston, New York, San Francisco, Seattle, and Washington D.C. The centers are equipped with world-class facilities aimed at providing a customer-centric experience, thereby making the application process more convenient.

Amit Kumar Sharma, Head of North America & Caribbean for VFS Global, emphasized the importance of these centers, “We are honored by the continued trust the Government of India has placed in VFS Global. These ICACs will play a crucial role in effectively meeting the growing demand for visa and consular services to India spurred by business partnerships, tourism, and trade.”

Established in 2008, VFS Global is the first outsourced visa services partner of the Ministry of External Affairs (India), offering passport, visa, and consular services for the Indian government. Since 2020, the firm has been providing these services across the United States and manages Application Centres for the Government of India across seven countries, including Australia, Iraq, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

VFS Global stands as a global leader in trusted technology services, offering non-judgmental and administrative task management related to applications for visa, passport, and consular services for client governments worldwide. Inaugurating over 3,900 Application Centres in 165 countries, the company has processed over 499 million applications since 2001, with a focus on ethical practices and sustainability.

Headquartered in Zurich and Dubai, VFS Global is majorly owned by investment funds managed by Blackstone Inc., with stakeholders such as Swiss-based Kuoni and Hugentobler Foundation, according to Glocal Konsult.

Source: Original article

Shah Rukh Khan Wins First National Award After 33 Years

Shah Rukh Khan has been awarded his first National Film Award for Best Actor, marking a long-awaited milestone in his distinguished career.

After an illustrious career spanning over 33 years, Bollywood icon Shah Rukh Khan has received his first National Film Award for his role in Jawan. The recognition is seen as a significant milestone for the actor, who is affectionately known as the “King of Bollywood.” This award comes on the heels of a storied journey marked by numerous acclaimed and commercially successful films.

The 71st National Film Awards, announced today, honored Shah Rukh with the Best Actor award for his powerful performance in Jawan. Despite his long list of achievements across both critically lauded and blockbuster movies, this marks his first National Award. Many in the industry and among his fanbase view this achievement as long overdue.

Shah Rukh Khan began his film career in 1992 with Deewana and swiftly ascended to become one of India’s most celebrated and bankable actors. Over the years, he has starred in films such as Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge, Swades, Chak De! India, and My Name Is Khan, each earning critical acclaim.

Despite being a fan favorite, Shah Rukh often found the prestigious National Film Award just out of his reach. In 2004, his performance as Mohan Bhargava, a NASA engineer reconnecting with his roots in Swades, was highly praised but overshadowed by Saif Ali Khan’s win for Hum Tum.

His role in Chak De! India as Kabir Khan, a hockey coach on a redemption path, led to the film winning a National Award, yet Shah Rukh himself was once again passed over for Best Actor, a title which went to Hrithik Roshan for Dhoom 2 in 2007.

In 2010, Shah Rukh delivered a powerful performance in My Name Is Khan, portraying Rizwan Khan, a man with Asperger’s Syndrome navigating a complex global backdrop. While it won international accolades, Amitabh Bachchan took the National Award for Best Actor that year for his role in Paa.

Finally receiving this recognition after years of near misses, Shah Rukh Khan’s fans and critics alike believe the award confirms his status not only as a beloved superstar but also as one of the finest actors working in Indian cinema today.

Beyond this recent accolade, Shah Rukh Khan’s contributions to cinema have been recognized with numerous prestigious honors. He is a recipient of the Padma Shri, one of India’s highest civilian awards, and has been awarded two of France’s distinguished titles, the Ordre des Arts et des Lettres and the Legion of Honour.

His journey to receiving a National Award underscores a career marked by persistence, outstanding performances, and a profound impact on audiences worldwide, cementing his legacy in the annals of Indian film history.

According to Hindustan Times.

Source: Original article

India Successfully Launches $1.5 Billion NASA Satellite

India successfully launched the world’s most expensive Earth-observation satellite, a $1.5 billion joint project with NASA, marking a significant milestone in international space collaboration.

After over a decade of development, NASA’s science leadership traveled to India this week to witness the launch of the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) satellite. This marks the most expensive Earth-observation satellite project to date, with a price tag of $1.5 billion. The satellite successfully launched into orbit on Wednesday aboard India’s Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle, a medium-lift rocket.

The NISAR mission is designed to observe Earth’s land and ice surfaces from a Sun-synchronous orbit located 464 miles (747 kilometers) above the planet. The satellite will gather crucial data from these surfaces, including the polar regions, twice every 12 days. This data collection is expected to provide valuable insights into how various terrestrial surfaces change over time, including the impact of climate change.

The satellite’s main innovation lies in its combination of two synthetic aperture radar instruments. NASA has contributed the L-band radar, which is particularly effective at measuring soil moisture, forests, and the movements of land and ice surfaces. ISRO’s contribution, an S-band radar, excels at monitoring agricultural changes, as well as grassland and human-made structures.

Although synthetic aperture radar technology has been under development by NASA and other space organizations for decades, the NISAR spacecraft is one of the first missions to integrate two different radar bands on a single platform. This integration provides a more comprehensive real-time view of changes occurring on Earth’s surface.

Following the successful launch, the spacecraft will enter a three-month commissioning phase. During this period, the NISAR satellite will deploy a large antenna reflector measuring 39 feet (12 meters) in diameter. The reflector will be responsible for sending and receiving microwaves, enabling the satellite to accurately measure surface changes.

The mission’s collaborative nature and significant budget make it notable. Earth observation missions usually cost less due to lower requirements for deep-space durability. For NASA-Isro, however, this is their most complex and costly collaboration to date. The success of this partnership could pave the way for future cooperative projects such as the Artemis program.

V. Narayanan, chairman of the Indian space agency, expressed enthusiasm for the mission’s capability to study Earth’s dynamic land and ice surfaces with unprecedented detail. “With this successful launch, we are at the threshold of fulfilling the immense scientific potential NASA and ISRO envisioned for the NISAR mission more than 10 years ago,” he said.

The agreement between NASA and ISRO to design and develop the satellite was signed on September 30, 2014, with an initial launch target set for 2024. Missing this target by less than a year is considered a respectable achievement by both space agencies.

Following the successful launch, NASA Acting Administrator Sean Duffy took to social media site X to celebrate the event. In his post, however, Duffy mistakenly credited former President Donald Trump with facilitating the mission’s success. “The mission is a joint U.S.-India effort, negotiated by President TRUMP,” Duffy wrote. “Thanks to his LEADERSHIP & our friends at @ISRO, @NASA is Making Space Great Again!” However, Trump’s presidency began nearly two and a half years after the initial negotiation between NASA and ISRO.

Despite the factual inaccuracy, Duffy’s acknowledgment of the mission’s importance—even amid proposed cuts to NASA’s science programs during Trump’s administration—could serve as a reminder of the value of such projects in understanding Earth’s changing environment.

Birthright Citizenship and the U.S. Constitution

On his first day in office, President Trump issued an executive order challenging the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of birthright citizenship, sparking a series of legal battles across the United States.

President Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship via executive order marked the start of numerous legal challenges, as state attorneys general, civil rights organizations, and immigrant groups swiftly filed lawsuits. This debate centers on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

The longstanding interpretation of this amendment has consistently affirmed a wide-ranging grant of citizenship. Highlighting this understanding, the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark confirmed that the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship to all U.S.-born individuals, including those born to non-citizen parents. Notably, exceptions are rare, applying to cases such as children born to foreign diplomats.

Executive Order 14160, signed by Trump, seeks to deny citizenship to children born in the United States to mothers present unlawfully or temporarily and to fathers who are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents. This would exclude the children of undocumented immigrants and those holding temporary visas, such as student or work visas, from being recognized as U.S. citizens.

The order directs federal agencies to withhold documents confirming citizenship for these children, implying a denial of passports and social security numbers, while potentially still receiving birth certificates.

The 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, ratified in 1868, was designed to settle debates surrounding citizenship eligibility decisively. Prior to this, the legal stance on citizenship was largely ambiguous, particularly regarding non-white persons born in the U.S. Early legal interpretations generally held that U.S.-born individuals were citizens, but this did not necessarily extend to enslaved or free Black persons, who faced significant legal vulnerabilities.

In the landmark Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, the Supreme Court infamously ruled that Black people could not be U.S. citizens. This controversial decision was later rebuked by Republicans post-Civil War, leading to the inclusion of an unequivocal citizenship guarantee within the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.

Congressional debate records reveal that the 14th Amendment’s inclusive citizenship guarantee was always intended to cover children of immigrants, regardless of parental legal status. During the 1866 discussions, Senator Jacob Howard clarified that the clause reflected existing national and natural law, affirming the citizenship of all born within U.S. borders. Despite concerns voiced by some lawmakers, Senator John Conness supported the inclusive nature of the language, emphasizing equal civil rights for all native-born individuals.

The Supreme Court reiterated this interpretation in Wong Kim Ark, dismissing claims against citizenship for U.S.-born children of non-citizens.

If implemented, Trump’s executive order could cause widespread issues, potentially rendering hundreds of thousands of children stateless, stripping them of essential rights and protections associated with citizenship. Stateless individuals lack access to crucial services and rights, including healthcare, education, and travel, and might face deportation to unfamiliar countries.

Additionally, the order risks creating severe bureaucratic challenges, as government entities would lose the reliability of birth certificates for citizenship verification, leading to increased potential for discriminatory practices.

Following numerous lawsuits disputing the order’s constitutionality, several federal district courts issued temporary blocks. The matter escalated to the Supreme Court in Trump v. CASA, where a divided court decided that universal preliminary injunctions are unlawful unless necessary to protect claimants’ rights. This decision led to further deliberations by lower courts without addressing the executive order’s constitutional validity.

While the Supreme Court’s recent decision allows for the potential enforcement of the order, recent lower court rulings have affirmed extensive blocks on its implementation. Despite the current legal ambiguity, many legal experts assert that the order is clearly unconstitutional, anticipating a future Supreme Court decision on the matter.

The question of birthright citizenship remains a contentious topic, with ongoing legal proceedings likely to shape this critical aspect of American citizenship law.

Source: Original article

Trump Imposes 25% Tariff on Indian Imports

President Donald Trump has announced a 25% tariff on imports from India, marking the latest development in his aggressive trade policy during his second term.

President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday that imports from India will be subjected to a new 25% tariff. This decision is the most recent action in his administration’s vigorous trade policies that have increasingly become a focal point of his presidency.

The announcement, made via Trump’s social media platform Truth Social, cited India’s existing tariffs as being “far too high” and criticized their trade restrictions as “strenuous and obnoxious.” Additionally, Trump mentioned penalties targeting India’s reliance on Russian energy and military hardware.

Trump’s declaration arrives just before a crucial trade negotiation deadline on Friday, which he asserted would remain firm without extensions. He has indicated that a plethora of other nations could also experience elevated baseline tariff levels, potentially reaching as high as 20%, which builds on the already heightened 10% tariffs introduced in April.

The potential tariff levels could approach the historic highs that Trump initially proposed on April 2, deemed “Liberation Day,” which had initially unsettled global markets and triggered stock market declines.

Having initially retreated from those threats, President Trump has gradually reinstated elevated tariff measures, reminiscent of levels seen during the 1930s when protectionist trade strategies were employed in a bid to reinvigorate the U.S. economy, albeit with counterproductive outcomes that exacerbated the Great Depression.

According to the Yale University Budget Lab, as of their recent Monday analysis, U.S. consumers face a de facto tariff rate of 18.2%, the highest since 1934. This could result in a household loss equivalent of up to $2,400 by 2025. Notably, these figures were calculated before Trump’s recent tariff announcement on India.

While the 25% tariff on Indian imports is lower than the previously suggested 26% on April 2, it marks a substantial rise from India’s customary average tariff rate of 2.4% on exports to the U.S. In recent years, India has been a critical partner for the U.S., exporting approximately $90 billion in annual goods.

India recently overtook other suppliers as the leading source of smartphones imported into the United States, aligning with Apple’s strategic move to relocate production away from China due to heightened tariffs and geopolitical tensions, as reported by Bloomberg. Apple notably exported $17 billion worth of iPhones from India last year.

Apple CEO Tim Cook noted during the company’s May 1 earnings call that, starting this quarter, the majority of iPhones sold in the U.S. would likely originate from India.

beyond smartphones, the U.S. imports a variety of products from India, including chemicals, plastics, leather goods, agricultural commodities, and metals.

In the previous year, India imposed an average tariff rate of 5.2% on U.S. goods, primarily purchasing oil, cement, stone, glass, and machinery from American markets.

President Trump’s focus on tariffs as a key trade strategy perpetuates a climate of unpredictability within the global economy. Over recent weeks, Trump has unveiled new agreements with several other countries aimed at refining trade conditions with the U.S. Despite the intentions, critics argue these deals are mired in ambiguous details and difficult promises to implement.

However, major stock indices have shown resilience and have continued to rise, partly because some companies observe that the tariffs’ impact may not be as severe as initially anticipated when Trump first introduced his sweeping country-specific tariffs in April.

Nonetheless, the recently negotiated bilateral trade agreements come with tariffs significantly higher than historical norms. These agreements stipulate 19% tariffs on goods from Indonesia and the Philippines, and 15% tariffs on imports from Japan and the European Union.

Furthermore, a new deal with Vietnam imposes tariffs of 20% on its exports, with potential increases to 40% for goods rerouted from China.

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty Assumes Charge as President of AAPI

CMEs, AI in Medicine, Health & Wellbeing, Women’s Forum, CEO Forum, Bollywood Extravaganza, Medical Research and Jeopardy Fill AAPI’s 43rd Annual Convention in Cincinnati, OH

Cincinnati, OH – July 27th: A historic moment unfolded as Dr. Amit Chakrabarty and Dr. Hetal Gor formally assumed charge as the President and the Chair, BOT respectively of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) during the 43rd annual convention at the iconic Cincinnati Marriott at RiverCenter and Northern Kentucky Convention Center, Cincinnati, OH on Saturday, July 26th, 2025 as the convention came to a close with the gala attended by over 1,000 delegates from across the nation.

AAPI Convention 3

During a solemn ceremony Dr. Satheesh Kathula, the outgoing President of AAPI, passed on the gavel to Dr. Amit Chakrabarty during the Gala on Saturday night at the end of the convention, marking a new chapter of service, collaboration, and vision. The event brought together hundreds of members of AAPI, past leaders, and incoming officers, symbolizing unity and a shared commitment to elevating the voice of Indian-origin physicians across the U.S.

Along with Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, his executive committee consisting of Dr. Meher Medavaram, President-Elect; Dr. Krishan Kumar, Vice President;  Dr. Seema Arora, Secretary; and Dr. Soumya NeravetlaTreasurer, assumed charge as part of the new Executive Committee.  Dr. Hetal Gor assumed charge as the Chair, BOT. Dr. Gautam Kamthan will serve as the President, YPS, and Dr. Priyanka Kolli is the President, MSRF, both, representing the Medical Students and Fellows at the national AAPI.

“Today marks a sacred beginning—one that’s not only about taking oath, but about embracing purpose,” said Dr. Chakrabarty, immediately after taking charge as the President of AAPI, the nation’s largest ethnic medical association. “This stage is illuminated not just by lights, but by the commitment of every physician who’s journeyed with faith, resilience, and passion. With this new chapter, we honor our heritage, step forward with courage, and vow to lead with integrity.”

“I am committed to unify AAPI by breaking down the barriers of various regions, languages, medical education within the organization and bringing everyone together as a whole organization rather than separate fragments of the organization,” Dr. Chakrabarty said.

Dr. Chakrabarty rose through the ranks of AAPI with his hard work and dedication, serving AAPI for nearly a quarter century. “We have the potential to make a significant impact on the healthcare landscape of this country,” Dr. Chakrabarty asserted. “My goal this year is to unify AAPI by transcending the regional divides that have hindered our progress in recent years. Indian American physicians represent tremendous talent and potential, and the key to realizing that lies in collective action and a united voice—something I am committed to fostering.”

AAPI Convention 1

As he steps into this leadership role, Dr. Chakrabarty pledged to work toward strengthening and expanding AAPI, which represents the interests of over 120,000 Indian American physicians, Residents, and Fellows. The Alabama-based urologist envisions a future where AAPI becomes “more vibrant, united, transparent, and politically active,” with increased membership and a stronger presence among younger physicians. He emphasized the importance of ensuring that “AAPI’s voice is heard in the corridors of power.”

He underscored transparency with regular Townhall meetings with members and direct accessibility to answer any questions that the members have, providing a platform to answer any concerns, where elected BOT/EC members will present their findings based on a rational, non-biased, and objective review that will be communicated with the members and posted on the AAPI website.

Working with his dedicated executive committee, Dr. Chakrabarty wants that “our voices must be heard by the people making the laws. AAPI must succeed in bringing to the forefront the many important health care issues facing the physician community and raising our voice unitedly before the US lawmakers. Our membership is our strength; as the 2nd largest medical association behind the AMA, we cannot stay silent any longer,” he said.

In his warm farewell address, Dr. Kathula shared with the audience the many programs and initiatives he and his executive committee have organized in the past year since assuming charge as the President of AAPI. Dr. Kathula, among others, highlighted the successful organization of Global health Summit in New Delhi and Hyderabad, and the many initiatives at the Summit,  research contest and the many charitable works and the webinars and workshops, as wells the Bone Marrow and Share a Blanket initiatives..

AAPI Convention 2

Dr. Kathula presented Presidential Awards to: Dr. Bhushan Pandya, Dr. Sunil Kaza, Dr. Vemuri Murthy, and Dr. Dwarkanda Reddy for their accomplishments and contribution to AAPI and to the larger society.  Dr. Satheesh Kathula was honored for his outstanding leadership, commitment to AAPI’s mission, and for carrying the entire AAPI family together, as well as for his contributions to realize the lofty goals of AAPI.

“The organizing committees have been working hard to make the AAPI Convention of 2025 rewarding and memorable for all. They have been working hard to put together an attractive program for our annual get together, educational activities, and family enjoyment. We are fortunate to have a dedicated team of convention committee members from the Ohio region helping us,” Dr. Kathula said. He particularly called out Vijaya Kodali, for her dedication, integrity, and hard work as she manages AAPI office and coordinates the activities related to AAPI functioning.

At the BOT luncheon, physicians with distinguished achievements and community services were honored. Dr. Navin Nanda, Dr. P K Vedantham, Dr. Krishan Kumar,  Dr. Jagdish Gupta, Dr. Ravi Parikh, and Dr. Avi Singh Gandhi were honored with AAPI’s prestigious Service Awards. Winners of the Research/Poster Presentation from across the nation who had presented the abstracts of their research on diverse medical topics, were honored with cash awards.

Reflecting back on AAPI’s progress over the last year, Dr. Sunil Kaza, the outgoing BOT Chair, said during the luncheon meeting, “Start of AAPI 2024-2025 term was like a storm, the likes of which, AAPI had never seen before !” and added, “Despite multiple and significant challenges, together with our EC, BOT and committee members, we have fulfilled our PROMISES.”

Dr. Hetral Gor shared with the audience, her journey as an ordinary member to how she has grown to be the chair of AAPI BOT. She described her plans for AAPI as the new Chair that she plans to initiative in collaboration with the new Executive Committee led by Dr. Amit Chakrabarty.

With the lighting of the traditional lamp and cutting the ribbon by Jacqueline Coleman, Lieutenant Governor of Kentucky, Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, president of the American Medical Association, Dr. D Nageshwar Reddy, a Padma Vibhushan awardee, Dr. Kathula, Dr. Sunil Kaza, outgoing Chair of AAPI BOT, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, Dr. Hetal Gor, and Dr. Meher Medavram, President-Elect of AAPI. The ceremony began with the beautiful rendition of the national anthems of both the US and India by Dr. Aarti Pandya.

AAPI Convention 2025 4

Speakers at the Convention included: Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, president of the American Medical Association; Dr. Lyuba Konopasek, MD, Senior Vice President, Intealth/ECFMG, Executive Director, FAIMER; Michael Suk, MD, BOT Chair, AMA; George Abraham, MD, Chair, Federation of State Medical Boards; and Dr. D Nageshwar Reddy, a Padma Vibhushan awardee. Dr. Mario Capecchi, a Nobel laureate, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine/Physiology in 2007 for his contributions to the development of “Mouse knockout technology” delivered the keynote address at the AAPI Convention. Their addresses to the audience offered unprecedented insights into healthcare’s evolving landscape.

“I’ve been an AAPI member since I started medical school, and I’m an AMA member. But it’s like having a left hand and a right hand that don’t interact much. And that needs to be improved,” Dr. Bobby Mukamala, President of the American Medical Association, said in his keynote address. “I’m excited to be the first Indian descent president of the AMA to integrate that more. So that AAPI and the AMA both work together to improve physicians’ ability to take care of patients and the health of this country. Both are critical to make that happen, and if two critical aspects aren’t working together. We can work together, and we can watch them grow exponentially. When we work together, it will be exponential growth for both organizations.”

Jennifer Coleman, Lt. Governor of Kentucky, told AAPI members that, “We have so much appreciation for the work that you do, your compassion, the care that you provide, the long hours, the sacrifices that you make and that your families make. And you are the reason that the Governor and I refer to you as a title you have truly earned, which is healthcare heroes. So, thank you for what you do.”

Congressman Jonathan Jackson from Illinois, 1st congressional district sated, “Thank you for your outstanding leadership of this august body.”

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty Assumes Charge as President of AAP

Aftab Pureval, Mayor of Cincinnati, shared with the audience his life story as a child born to refugees from the Himalayas to the United States. “And it’s because of Trailblazers like you that next generations like me and my brother can pursue our dreams in whatever field that may be. Congratulations everybody! So excited for you to choose Cincinnati, and I hope you have a wonderful conference.”

The Convention was packed with 10 hours of Continuing Medical Education (CME) sessions delivered by world-renowned speakers, Women’s Forum, and specialized tracks on Medical Education and Medical Licensing, AAPI Has Got Talent, entertainment by world renowned artists, and upcoming talents from the local community.

“Whether you are a physician, a healthcare professional, or an industry partner, this convention has presented a valuable opportunity to showcase your business and connect with influential leaders in the medical field, said Dr. Meher Medavaram, President-Elect. “We are delighted to have you all in Cincinnati for this exceptional event.

The Convention delivered groundbreaking insights into modern healthcare, featuring top medical professionals from across the nation. Artificial Intelligence emerged as a critical theme, with Dr. Suresh Reddy and Dr. Nageshwara Rao explored AI’s transformative potential in healthcare delivery and patient management, while highlighting ethical considerations in medical technology.

Daily morning programs focused on sleep techniques and anxiety management, providing physicians innovative strategies for personal and professional well-being, emphasizing holistic professional development.

The Medical Licensing Forum, led by Dr. Amol Soin, brought together state medical board representatives to discuss critical practice pathways and professional standards. A comprehensive research symposium showcased cutting-edge medical research, with poster presentations and awards recognizing outstanding contributions to medical science.

According to Dr. Krishan Kumar, “The annual convention offered extensive academic presentations, recognition of achievements and achievers, and professional networking at the alumni and evening social events, in addition to offering an exciting venue to interact with leading physicians, healthcare industry leaders, academicians, and scientists of Indian origin.”

“The conference brought together acclaimed Physicians, healthcare professionals and leaders, in addition to including Academicians, Researchers and Medical students from across the world for a dynamic exchange of ideas, serving as a collaborative effort to shape the future of healthcare on a global scale,” Dr. Soumya Neravetla, Treasurer of AAPI said.

On July 24th, AAPI delegates had an exclusive Cruise on the majestic River Queen Boat at the famous Ohio River, with entertainment, live music, and dance.  “It was such a memorable experience, having a glimpse at the skyline and watching the river on a sightseeing cruise along the Ohio River departing from the Kentucky side of Cincinnati, and experiencing live entertainment as you go,” said Dr. Hetal Gor. The Biriyani Nite with Bollywood music on the banks of the Ohio River that went into midnight was yet another experience for the AAPI delegates at the convention.

Special Highlights at the Convention included, Women’s Forum, Cultural Extravaganza, Networking opportunities, Cruise and Entertainment on the Ohio River and Gala dinners celebrating medical excellence. . In addition to the academic and professional offerings, attendees enjoyed three nights of world-class entertainment, making this a well-rounded and memorable gathering.

The convention successfully bridged medical expertise, technological innovation, and professional networking, setting new benchmarks for the future of healthcare.

Dr. Chakrabarty urged all AAPI members to join in this historic journey. “AAPI’s mission is clear, our programs will continue to strive, and our impact is infectious in benefiting society. Today I ask you to set aside your differences and join me in this noble journey to make our mission possible. A new era has begun. AAPI will continue to discover her own potential to be an active and vital player in shaping the landscape of the national healthcare delivery system with a focus on health maintenance than disease intervention,” Dr. Chakrabarty said.

Dr. Chakrabarty invited AAPI members to “come and participate at the 44th annual convention to be held in Tampa, FL from July 2nd to 5th, 2026. We look forward to having you all join us in Tampa, FL!” For more information on AAPI and the 44th convention, please visit: www.aapiconvention.org. For more details on AAPI, please visit: www.aapiusa.org

Ajay Ghosh

Media Coordinator, AAPI

Phone # 203.583.6750

Dr. Hetal Gor Assumes Charge as AAPI BOT Chair

“We decided to ride the storm! We decided to right the ship!” Dr. Sunil Kaza  Said in His Farewell Address During AAPI’s 43rd Annual Convention in Cincinnati, OH

Cincinnati, OH – July 26th: Dr. Hetal Gor, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist from New Jersey, assumed charge as the Chair, Board of Trustees of AAPI, during the 43rd annual convention being organized here at the at the iconic Cincinnati Marriott at RiverCenter and Northern Kentucky Convention Center, Cincinnati, OH on Saturday, July 65, 2025. Dr. Sunil Kaza, the outgoing BOT Chair, during the luncheon meeting as part of the Convention officially handed over the mantle to Dr. Gor.

BOT 3

“Reflecting back on AAPI’s progress over the last year, Dr. Sunil Kaza, the outgoing BOT Chair, said during the luncheon meeting, “Start of AAPI 2024-2025 term was like a storm, the likes of which, AAPI had never seen before !” Quoting Sadhguru, Dr. Kaza said, “You can learn to prevent the storm, or you can learn to ride the storm! If you can learn how to ride the storm, the storm is not a problem anymore. We decided to ride the storm! We decided to right the ship !,” and added, “Despite multiple and significant challenges, together with our EC, BOT and committee members, we have fulfilled our PROMISES.”

Highlighting some of the major initiatives under his leadership, Dr. Kaza said, “We provided scholarships through the Kakani educational scholarship for 2023-2024 and 2024-2025. For medical students, residents, and fellows, funds were secured and raised to support MSRF and their convention. For young physicians, funding was obtained to support YPS and their convention.”

For AAPI, Dr. Kaza said, BOT helped address various legal matters. We secured IMRA membership for AAPI and united Indian physicians regardless of their state of origin. We prioritized fiscal responsibility by minimizing social event expenses, and ensured AAPI elections followed ethical standards. Collaboration with the Executive Committee maintained transparency and continued a conservative approach to spending.”

Sunil Kaza

Regarding the activities from the US to India, Dr. Kaza referred to AAPI meeting with India’s Health Minister, Mr. JP Nada, to discuss improvements in emergency medicine care, including expanding education and increasing availability of EMT technicians. Discussions also focused on increasing residency seats in family and emergency medicine.

During his leadership, he said, AAPI sponsored research awards for GAIMS, supported its peer-reviewed journal, collaborated to promote HPV vaccination awareness and raise $45,000 for health and education initiatives in India, began work on the AAPI Global Foundation, raised $31,000 to support 62 tribal schools through Ekal Vidyalaya, and worked to obtain FCRA exemption for future charitable activities via the AAPI India Foundation.

Dr. Hetal Gor is a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist, is the president/Founder of Bergen Indian Medical Association , President /Founder of US chapter of FOGSI (Federation of OBGYN Society of India, and had served as the past President of the American Association of OBGYN of Indian Origin. Dr Gor is the Chair of North NJ chapter of the Indian American Women Entrepreneurs Association, and serves on the Board of Trustees of Bergen Performing Arts Center in Englewood, NJ, where she brings Indian art and artists to showcase Indian Heritage.

BOT

Dr. Gor shared with the audience, her TEN year journey in AAPI as co- Chair of NYC Covention in 2016 to the chairwoman of AAPI BOT. Dr.Gor described her plans for AAPI as the new Chair -Her plans in collaboration with the new Executive Committee led by Dr. Amit Chakrabarty.

“One thing that I’m very passionate about is knowledge , KNOWLEDGE IS POWER so starting this year a medical Legal monthly Zoom webinars ,this  will be in collaboration with SABA -South Asian Bar Association.”

Integrative medical wellness is another area Dr. Gor wants to focus on, she said. “This will help us have work work-life balance, tackle physician burnout, and a demanding, stressful work environment.”

“A well-balanced person is a better physician,” she said. Another area where AAPI plans to engage is organizing free health fairs and lecture sessions, educating the general public on common health issues that impact our communities.

“This year, we plan to implement and continue with the mentorship mentee program, guiding the junior physicians, medical student residents, alongside working with AMA,” Dr. Gor said. She promised financial stability, transparency, integrity, and hard work. “So, we’re going to make it a fun, entertaining, stress-free environment with positive vibrations, and everybody will be part of it.”

Feature and Cover Dr Hetal Gor Assumes Charge as AAPI BOT ChairDr. Satheesh Kathula, the outgoing President of AAPI lauded the support and guidance he received from Dr. Kaza and other members of the BOT, including the incoming BOT Chair, Dr. Gor. Expressing his gratitude to AAPI’s executive committee members, including  AAPI’s Convention committee chairs and members, volunteers and sponsors for their continued dedication and visionary leadership in their efforts to make this convention truly a historic one for all, Dr. Kathula, said. “The organizing committees have been working hard to make the AAPI Convention of 2025 rewarding and memorable for all.”

Announcing the recipients of the prestigious AAPI Service Awards, Dr. Uma Jonnalagadda, said,  “AAPI is glad to recognize and honor your accomplishments, hard work, dedication, and  contributions to the cause of AAPI.” Dr. Navin Nanda, Dr. P K Vedantham, Dr. Krishan Kumarm Dr. Jagdish Gupta, Dr. Ravi Parikh, and Dr. Avi Singh Gandhi were honored with the prestigious AAPI awards at the luncheon event. 

Dr. Sudhir Parikh, CEO of Parikh Media, shared with the audience his vision to share our heritage with the next generation of Indian origin people through his media platforms. He assured the audience of his collaboration and support for AAPI in reaching its message across the Indian American community. “It’s been an honor and privilege for me to be associated with AAPI because I recognize the tremendous role that is being played by AAPI in promoting friendship between India and the United States,” he said.

In his keynote address, Aftab Pureval, shared with the audience his life story as a child born to refugees from the Himalayas to the United States. “I’m the son of a refugee. My mom was born in Tibet, and she was forced to flee when the Communists took over. So my mom and my grandparents picked up, made their way through the Himalayas, through Nepal and into India. Against all odds, she made it to college by the grace of the support and generosity of the Indian government, where she met my father, who’s from Punjab, India. The young couple got married and decided to come to the United States.”

AAPI BOT 3

 Pureval went on to add, “I’m really proud of my parents story, and really proud of the fact, because the generations that came before you had to struggle and progress to create community. Had to take racism and xenophobia head on and nevertheless create community, whether it be religious or cultural or professional, in order to continue to thrive and grow in this country. My parents loved America even before they themselves were Americans. They loved the idea of the American dream, and they came here hard, and they achieved that dream for themselves, but also for their kids.”

 Referring to the flourishing community of Indian American Americans, Pureval said, “Our community is so drawn to healthcare, so drawn to helping others, so drawn to public service, so drawn to supporting the most vulnerable in our community. And it’s because of Trailblazers like you that next generations like me and my brother can pursue our dreams in whatever field that may be. Congratulations everybody so excited for you to choose Cincinnati and I hope you have a wonderful conference.”

 The growing influence of doctors of Indian heritage is evident, as increasingly physicians of Indian origin hold critical positions in the healthcare, academic, research and administrative positions across the nation. With their hard work, dedication, compassion, and skills, they have thus carved an enviable niche in the American medical community. AAPI’s role has come to be recognized as vital among members and among lawmakers. AAPI is also transitioning into a multiyear thinking and behavior by maintaining core continuity.

For more details, please visit:  www.aapiconvention.org   and www.aapiusa.org

Indian F-1 Visas Drop 44% in 2025; New Regions Rise

Fewer Indian students are heading to the United States in 2025, even as student visa numbers rise sharply in countries like Zimbabwe, Vietnam, and Pakistan.

Between October 2024 and March 2025, the United States issued nearly 89,000 F-1 student visas worldwide, marking a 15% decline compared to the same period in the previous year. This downward trend reflects a significant reshaping of international student inflows with a broader geographical spread, yet lower overall volumes.

Despite the overall reduction in F-1 student visas, specific regions have experienced sharp increases. Notably, there has been a surge in student visa issuance in countries such as Zimbabwe, Vietnam, and Pakistan, contrasting the decrease observed among Indian students.

The data released by the U.S. Department of State highlights this shift in trends, underscoring a diversifying pool of international applicants seeking educational opportunities in the United States.

The decline in the Indian student cohort seeking U.S. education is particularly noteworthy, given the traditionally high numbers of Indian students who pursue studies in American institutions. This change indicates evolving dynamics in global educational exchanges and the U.S. as an academic destination.

According to Business Today, these developments come amid broader global trends influencing international education and mobility, including geopolitical, economic, and policy factors that affect student decisions and institutional admissions.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Proposes Stricter Citizenship Test and H-1B Reforms

The Trump administration is set to introduce significant immigration reforms, targeting the H-1B visa program and the U.S. citizenship test, with plans to make both processes more challenging.

The Trump administration is preparing to implement a new wave of immigration reforms aimed at changing the visa system for skilled foreign workers and revising the citizenship test. Joseph Edlow, the newly appointed Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), detailed these plans in an interview with The New York Times, describing the existing citizenship evaluation as “easy.”

“The test as it’s laid out right now, it’s not very difficult. It’s very easy to kind of memorize the answers. I don’t think we’re really comporting with the spirit of the law,” Edlow stated during the interview on Thursday.

The proposed changes arise amid a broader crackdown on immigration during Trump’s second term, which has seen tightened visa rules and reduced refugee programs, affecting both documented and undocumented immigrants. The administration intends to reintroduce a stricter version of the citizenship test first seen during Trump’s initial term in office. Under the new format, applicants must correctly answer 12 out of 20 civics questions compared to the current requirement of 6 out of 10, thereby ensuring a deeper understanding of U.S. civics and governance beyond rote memorization.

Another key proposal involves restructuring the H-1B visa program, which serves skilled foreign workers. Edlow indicated that the USCIS plans to prioritize companies offering higher wages over the current lottery-based system. This revision would address criticism that companies exploit the system by hiring cheaper foreign labor, thus undercutting American workers.

Vice President JD Vance echoed these concerns, criticizing companies that lay off domestic workers while continuing to hire foreign workers. However, Edlow maintains, “I really do think that the way H-1B needs to be used… is to, along with a lot of other parts of immigration, supplement, not supplant, U.S. economy and U.S. businesses and U.S. workers.”

Despite the administration’s push, not everyone agrees with the proposed direction. Doug Rand, a former Biden official, cautioned that favoring higher-salary positions might undermine the original purpose of the H-1B program. “Like it or not, the H-1B program is the main way that U.S. companies can hire the best and brightest international graduates of U.S. universities,” Rand remarked to The New York Times. “Congress never allowed DHS to put its thumb on the scale based on salary.”

Edlow, who was confirmed by the Senate in July 2025, is anticipated to play a pivotal role in shaping immigration policy. With extensive experience in immigration enforcement and policy, stemming from his previous tenure at USCIS and the Justice Department, Edlow emphasized that immigration should serve as a national asset. “I think it absolutely should be a net positive,” he commented. “And if we’re looking at the people that are coming over… to advance certain economic agendas and otherwise benefit the national interest, that’s absolutely what we need to be taking care of.”

Though detailed policy documents outlining these reforms have not yet been disclosed, the USCIS has signaled a broader return to the rigorous approach seen during Trump’s first term. That era witnessed tightened green card eligibility rules and alterations to the asylum system, many of which faced legal challenges.

According to The New York Times, the tangible impact of these proposed changes on businesses and immigrants remains closely watched as the policies unfold.

UK-India Trade Deal to Boost Bilateral Trade by $34 Billion

The United Kingdom and India have inked a historic free trade agreement projected to bolster their bilateral trade by over $34 billion annually, significantly boosting both economies.

The free trade agreement (FTA), signed on Thursday in the presence of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, aims to enhance economic collaboration between the world’s fifth and sixth largest economies by reducing tariffs and expanding market access.

The finalized trade pact, which took three years of intense negotiations, addresses crucial issues like visas, tariff reductions, and tax breaks. The urgency to complete the agreement accelerated as global trade scenarios shifted with U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff policies stirring global markets.

Once fully implemented, the agreement is expected to raise the bilateral trade by £25.5 billion annually by 2040. In 2024, the trade in goods and services between the two nations stood at over £40 billion.

This deal, hailed as a significant achievement by both leaders, promises to provide expansive benefits such as boosting wages, raising living standards, and lowering consumer prices, according to Starmer. Modi praised the agreement as a “blueprint for shared prosperity,” emphasizing the increased access to the UK market for Indian goods such as textiles, jewelry, agricultural products, and engineering items.

The terms of the agreement allow for the elimination or reduction of tariffs on 92% of UK goods exported to India, while up to 99% of Indian goods shipped to Britain will benefit from tariff exemptions. This development is a crucial strategic win for India’s trade position, enhancing market access for sectors previously burdened by high tariffs and regulatory hurdles.

According to Dhiraj Nim, an economist at ANZ Bank, the agreement reflects a strategic triumph for New Delhi’s trade diplomacy, offering Indian goods significant advantages. The UK government anticipates a reduction in the weighted average tariffs on its exports to India from 15% to 3%. However, the agreement awaits ratification by both countries’ parliaments, expected to take several months.

Beyond tariff reductions, the pact includes provisions exempting Indian temporary workers in the UK from paying social security contributions for three years, potentially increasing India’s talent presence in the UK.

The FTA’s impact extends across multiple sectors. For instance, tariffs on UK scotch and gin will be halved from 150% to 75%, eventually dropping to 40% over a decade. Similarly, tariffs on brandy and rum will be initially cut to 110% and further reduced to 75%. The automotive industry will see duties decline to 10% within five years under a quota system, down from the current rates of up to 110%.

Before this agreement, UK goods faced an average duty of 14.6% in India, while Indian goods attracted a 4.2% duty rate, as estimated by Samiran Chakraborty, a Citi Bank economist. This trade pact is among the first signed by India with a developed economy, highlighting the UK’s role in 3% of India’s total goods trade last year, primarily machinery and equipment, followed by textiles and footwear.

Benefiting significant Indian sectors like textiles, gems, and jewelry, the deal is poised to support employment and promote industrial growth in India, noted Nim. As market access improves, India’s trade surplus with the UK could widen over time, though easing UK export barriers might help narrow this gap in the future.

“It is hard to say exactly which direction the surplus would go,” Nim stated, though a rise in overall trade volume is certain.

For both countries, the agreement offers leverage in ongoing negotiations with other trading partners, including the U.S., analysts suggest. Alicia Garcia Herrero, chief economist at Natixis Bank, noted this deal enhances both nations’ positions compared to the U.S.

As London continues to work out the details of its trade pact with the U.S. following an agreement in May, a potential meeting between Starmer and Trump is anticipated during the U.S. President’s personal visit to Scotland.

Economically, the deal is expected to contribute an additional £4.8 billion ($6.5 billion) each year to the UK’s economic output, which was £2.85 trillion in 2024. Modi views this agreement as a strategic opportunity to propel India’s trade discussions with other developed nations, aiming to position India as a competitive and viable trade partner.

As Sameep Shastri, vice president of the BRICS Chamber of Commerce and Industry, articulated on CNBC’s Inside India, the UK agreement signals India’s readiness to engage on equitable trade terms with Western powers, strengthening its global trade voice.

Meanwhile, India is rushing to finalize a trade deal with Washington before August 1 to avoid increased U.S. tariffs scheduled to rise to 26%.

UN Staff Union Declares No Confidence in Secretary-General

The UN Staff Union in Geneva has unanimously declared a vote of no confidence in the Secretary-General and the UN80 restructuring plan, citing concerns over transparency, job cuts, and organizational direction.

The United Nations is facing a growing internal backlash against its ambitious UN80 restructuring initiative. Staff unions are rallying against the plan, which has now sparked a vote of no confidence targeting UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and Under-Secretary-General Guy Ryder, the leader of the restructuring process.

On July 24, an Extraordinary General Assembly meeting held by the Staff Union Council in Geneva culminated in the adoption of a critical motion. Attended by nearly 600 staff members—well above the quorum of 200—the meeting’s participants unanimously expressed grave concerns over the UN80 plan, voicing distrust in the leadership charged with its roll-out.

UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq responded cautiously, reaffirming the organization’s commitment to engaging with staff representatives. “We remain committed, as we have been from the beginning of the UN80 Initiative, to consultation with staff representatives and engagement with them through the procedures in place for this purpose,” Haq stated. He further urged a collective approach to mitigate negative impacts and navigate the challenging reforms ahead for a more effective United Nations.

A memo from Laura Johnson, Executive Secretary, and Ian Richards, President of the Staff Union in Geneva, presented multiple reasons for the disenchantment. One major point of contention is the lack of vision and evaluation in the UN80 initiative, which critics claim has been hastily conducted. Staff unions also criticize budget proposals for 2026, which suggest cutting 20 percent of posts without evidence of crisis resolution, while contrasting this with other organizations maintaining zero-growth budgets.

The union’s memo also denounces the reinforcement of a top-heavy UN structure. Most job cuts are expected at junior levels, with no reductions at the Under-Secretaries-General level. Additionally, allegations have surfaced that Secretary-General Guterres has extended some USG contracts beyond his mandate, promoting personnel selectively while limiting others to a year to avoid indemnities during separations.

Additional apprehension stems from the decentralization proposal, which could increase long-term costs, and the indictment of staff for organizational failures, which may partially result from the UN’s dwindling visibility in peace and security matters.

The UNOG Staff Union intends to deliver the motion and its underlying concerns to the Secretary-General and subsequently to UN Member States. Staff members are also encouraged to voice their grievances through a survey conducted by the Coordination Committee for International Staff Unions and Associations (CCISUA), active until July 27, as well as direct correspondence with union representatives.

Simultaneously, the UN80 Initiative is progressing under the oversight of Guy Ryder, with a Task Force exploring three primary areas: enhancing efficiencies and improvements, mandate reviews mandated by Member States, and a strategic review of deeper, structural organizational changes. Secretary-General Guterres underscores the initiative’s broader implications, stressing that UN budgets impact lives across the globe.

The initiative’s core objectives focus on improved efficiency and effectiveness by streamlining operations and reducing costs while better aligning the UN’s operations with its mandates. Ongoing structural reforms may consolidate departments and agencies, aiming for a strategic realignment of the UN’s programs to current necessities and priorities.

The discontent among staff highlights the challenges of implementing organizational change in a complex, globally-distributed workforce, as internal opposition and the drive for reform continue to shape the trajectory of the UN80 initiative.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Stance Changes on Prosecuting Former Presidents

As President Donald Trump and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard seek to pacify their base over the Jeffrey Epstein files, they propose the idea of charging former President Barack Obama with treason for allegedly undermining Trump’s first presidency.

The suggestion by Trump and Gabbard involves allegations that Obama orchestrated false intelligence regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election to weaken Trump before assuming office. Despite the audacious claim, the primary challenge is the lack of evidence against Obama or other officials. Furthermore, even substantial evidence might clash with legal immunity afforded to former presidents.

Gabbard’s narrative suggests Obama engineered intelligence about Russian interference during the 2016 election to damage Trump. However, such claims are based on dubious interpretations and misleading information. Moreover, significant intelligence findings have been repeatedly validated, even by Republicans like Trump’s Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a crucial 2020 Senate report.

Besides evidentiary challenges, there’s the issue of whether Obama would be immune from prosecution—a situation paradoxically shaped by Trump himself. In 2024, Trump championed the notion that presidents should have extensive immunity from criminal charges, a stance upheld by the Supreme Court, potentially shielding Obama from any prosecution attempt.

Despite suggestions from Trump and Gabbard that Obama could face charges, Trump’s own legal team had previously argued against such actions, emphasizing the vital need for presidential immunity. Trump’s former personal lawyer, D. John Sauer, told the Supreme Court that without immunity from criminal prosecution, the presidency would be incapacitated.

Sauer went as far as positing that a president could make extreme decisions, like ordering the assassination of political opponents, without facing charges since such actions would fall under official presidential duties.

While the Supreme Court didn’t endorse this extreme interpretation, it did reinforce presidential immunity. This raises the question of whether such immunity would apply to Obama.

The Court concluded actions taken under a president’s core executive powers are immune. Furthermore, presidents possess presumed immunity for acts within their official responsibilities, which are not patently beyond their authority. However, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. established a high threshold for instances in which immunity wouldn’t apply.

The ruling’s implications are still debated, especially concerning Trump’s alleged actions related to the January 6 Capitol riot. Although these cases never reached trial after Trump’s election, prosecutors and judges continue to reassess valid evidence and charges.

Harvard law professor Richard Lazarus noted, “Assuming this nonsense is true, if Obama were acting in his official capacity in merely communicating with his intelligence folks about Russian interference, clear immunity.” But if Obama’s actions were personal, aiming to support Clinton’s campaign, immunity might not be so apparent.

Comparatively, it would be simpler for Obama to argue that the actions in question encompassed official duties, unlike Trump’s attempts to contest election results, which fall outside a president’s established role, typically managed by states.

In the eyes of Trump’s and Gabbard’s accusations, Obama was involved in creating intelligence reports. However, seeking intelligence falls under a president’s core responsibilities. Even if not, such actions remain within the “outer perimeter” of official duties, where overcoming immunity is challenging.

UCLA law professor Rick Hasen noted “Communicating with intelligence officials would seem to fall into the scope of official duties.” Yet, theoretical charges would face a major hurdle due to the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States, precluding the use of official acts as criminal evidence.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, during a press briefing, repeatedly deferred on whether immunity applied to Obama. “I’ll leave that to the Department of Justice,” she remarked.

Overall, while the situation appears academic, it remains highly speculative that Trump and his Justice Department would pursue prosecuting Obama. Historically, Trump’s claims often dissipate. However, media coverage, more focused on Obama allegations than the Epstein files, indicates a potential temporary diversion strategy.

This juxtaposition is striking. Trump’s legal position argued for comprehensive presidential immunity as essential for executive functions. Yet, he suggests abandoning those standards for his predecessor’s more official-seeming actions.

According to Trump’s legal rationale, Obama could arguably have taken far more drastic actions than adjusting intelligence reports, potentially without consequence.

Source: Original article

India’s Economy to Reach Third Largest Globally by 2028: Report

India is projected to become the world’s third-largest economy by 2028, with its GDP expected to exceed $10 trillion by 2035, driven by key states reaching significant economic milestones, according to a report by Morgan Stanley.

India is on the path to becoming the third-largest economy in the world by 2028, with its gross domestic product (GDP) anticipated to more than double to $10.6 trillion by 2035. This forecast comes from a recent report by Morgan Stanley released on July 23.

The financial services firm’s analysis suggests that India’s growth will be significantly influenced by its states, with Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, and Karnataka expected to reach the $1 trillion economic milestone in the coming years.

Currently, the leading states include Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Telangana, according to Morgan Stanley. Additionally, Chhattisgarh, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh have shown substantial improvements in their economic rankings over the past five years.

The report highlights that India is poised to contribute approximately 20 percent to global growth in the near future, thereby elevating the earnings potential for major multinational corporations operating in the region.

In its latest bi-monthly monetary policy review, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) maintained its GDP growth forecast for the fiscal year 2026 at 6.5 percent. This outlook comes after increased central government expenditure on infrastructure, which has risen to 3.2 percent of the GDP for fiscal year 2025, compared to 1.6 percent in fiscal year 2015.

According to Moneycontrol, these infrastructural investments and the economic dynamism at the state level are pivotal to India’s projected economic ascent.

Source: Original article

Youth Event Promotes Global Peacebuilding Efforts

The Jubilee of Youth, a pivotal event within the Jubilee Year of Hope, will welcome young people from around the globe in a celebration aimed at fostering peace and unity.

The Jubilee Year of Hope continues its series of events with the much-anticipated Jubilee of Influencers and the Jubilee of Youth, scheduled from July 28 to August 3. Archbishop Rino Fisichella, Pro-Prefect of the Dicastery for Evangelization, has highlighted the multicultural and diverse nature of these celebrations, designed to unite young minds from across the world in the Eternal City.

Youth from 146 countries will converge on Rome, with the majority – 78% – arriving from European nations. The remaining 22% consists of young people from various parts of the world, including countries experiencing conflict such as Iraq, South Sudan, and Lebanon. Archbishop Fisichella emphasized that these gatherings are not just moments of celebration but significant steps toward peace worldwide, offering a communal embrace as a gesture of solidarity and hope.

Expected to draw at least half a million participants, the gathering will see 370 churches, 400 school buildings, gyms, and numerous families open their doors to accommodate the influx of young visitors. The city is meticulously prepared, with 20 strategically placed food stations and 3,500 vendors ensuring that everyone is well-fed, including those requiring celiac-friendly options.

The Jubilee will kick off with “Dialogue with the City,” featuring 70 events over three days from Tuesday to Thursday in various Roman squares. Diverse groups, associations, and bishops’ conferences will host these events. Highlights include the Duc in Altum theatre group’s street performances on the life of St. Therese of Lisieux and Caritas Internationalis’ interactive exhibits showcasing their mission work. Mary’s Meals will be on hand to discuss their efforts to combat poverty worldwide. The day will culminate in a welcoming Mass in St. Peter’s Square at 7 p.m.

Friday, August 1, has been designated for the sacrament of confession. The historic Circus Maximus will host around 200 priests in tents, offering the penitent young people a day of spiritual reflection.

On the evening of Saturday, August 2, Tor Vergata, the site of World Youth Day 2000, will host one of the grandest events. Here, Pope Leo XIV will join the multitude for a prayer vigil, during which he will engage with the youth through questions posed by representatives from Mexico, the United States, and Italy.

The Jubilee of Youth will conclude with a Mass led by Pope Leo XIV on Sunday, August 3, bringing the week of faith, fun, and friendships to a resonant close.

According to Vatican News, this series of events marks both a celebration of youth and a step forward in the global quest for peace.

Dr. Reddy’s to Launch Generic Obesity Drugs in 87 Countries

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories plans to launch a generic version of Novo Nordisk’s popular weight-loss drug Wegovy in 87 countries next year, focusing initially on emerging markets.

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, an India-based pharmaceutical company, announced plans to introduce a generic version of Novo Nordisk’s blockbuster weight-loss medication, Wegovy, to 87 countries in the following year. This strategic move, disclosed by CEO Erez Israeli, signals the company’s ambitions to capture a significant portion of the burgeoning global obesity drug market, projected to be worth approximately $150 billion by the early 2030s.

Initially, Dr. Reddy’s intends to release its generic semaglutide version—the active component in Wegovy and the diabetes treatment Ozempic—in countries such as Canada, India, Brazil, and Turkey, among various other emerging markets. This rollout is contingent upon the expiration of relevant patents, Israeli highlighted during a press conference discussing the firm’s earnings. He further noted that while the U.S. and European markets would open to these generics later, full access to other Western markets was expected between 2029 and 2033.

The company anticipates that sales of their generic drug will generate “hundreds of millions of dollars,” according to Israeli. The patent for semaglutide is expected to expire in multiple countries, including India in March of next year. Notably, in May, Novo Nordisk filed a lawsuit against Dr. Reddy’s, alleging infringement of its semaglutide patent, according to documents reviewed by Reuters.

Dr. Reddy’s has already submitted the necessary regulatory applications in all countries where it plans to launch the generic version. This aggressive expansion strategy aligns with broader industry trends, as several Indian pharmaceutical companies—including Cipla, Lupin, Biocon, and Sun Pharma—also aim to launch generic weight-loss medications, mirroring the success of Novo and its U.S. competitor, Eli Lilly.

Recently, Novo launched Wegovy in India, closely following Eli Lilly’s introduction of Mounjaro for weight-loss and diabetes management. Both Wegovy and Mounjaro belong to a class of drugs known as GLP-1 receptor agonists, which help manage blood sugar levels and slow digestion, contributing to prolonged feelings of satiety.

In addition to Wegovy’s generic, Dr. Reddy’s aims to launch 26 other GLP-1 drugs over the next decade as part of its long-term strategy, Israeli revealed. This expansion indicates the company’s proactive approach in capitalizing on the rapidly growing segment of obesity and diabetes treatments.

These developments underscore Dr. Reddy’s commitment to broadening its footprint in the global pharmaceutical market while addressing the escalating demand for affordable obesity medications.

GENIUS Act Enables Stablecoin Adoption via Mastercard

Mastercard stands poised to play a pivotal role in the burgeoning stablecoin ecosystem following the passage of the GENIUS Act, which ushers in a new era of regulatory clarity for digital assets with significant potential for global adoption.

On July 18, President Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law, providing a regulatory framework for stablecoins. This development closely followed Mastercard’s announcement regarding its future role in the regulated cryptocurrency space. Mastercard views the legislation as the start of “a new era of regulatory clarity and confidence in digital assets,” according to a company article titled “Stablecoins are taking center stage,” authored by Jesse McWaters, Executive Vice President and Head of Global Policy at Mastercard.

McWaters emphasizes the importance of regulatory frameworks in other regions, such as Europe’s Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA), and similar legislation in Hong Kong, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates. These measures create a secure environment for digital assets, bolster trust, and stimulate innovation that yields real-world benefits. According to McWaters, stablecoins already enhance the financial experiences of content creators and gig workers by offering a quicker and cheaper remittance method compared to traditional payment tools. Still, he notes that stablecoins must be integrated within a trusted system, a role he believes Mastercard is well-suited to fulfill.

Highlighting Mastercard’s history of involvement in pioneering technologies, McWaters suggests the company has long been preparing for the time when stablecoins assume a central role. Mastercard aims to establish a compliance-first ecosystem that allows stablecoins to scale safely, seamlessly integrating them into the global financial system without losing the unique advantages of cryptocurrencies, such as flexibility and convenience. Key projects like the Mastercard Multi-Token Network and Mastercard Crypto Credential are instrumental in this vision, and the company’s global partnerships are poised to support a smooth user experience.

McWaters cites recent favorable crypto regulations in several countries as a gateway to an innovative future, a path that Mastercard is eager to pursue. To make cryptocurrencies as user-friendly as traditional currency, Mastercard is developing solutions such as the Mastercard Crypto Credential. This human-readable credential aims to simplify user experiences by replacing complex blockchain addresses with easily manageable credentials, specifically targeting crypto exchanges and everyday users to facilitate smoother interactions.

Another significant Mastercard initiative is the Multi-Token Network, a business-to-business platform designed to facilitate crypto transactions between financial institutions and companies, reflecting the ongoing trend of tokenizing assets. This platform is available 24/7 for both financial institutions and application providers, providing constant access to crypto transactions.

Mastercard’s collaboration with MoonPay, a platform specializing in crypto on- and off-ramps, aims to integrate Mastercard-branded cards with crypto wallets. This partnership, which was announced in May and involved a brainstorming session earlier in the month, will allow cardholders to use stablecoins at locations accepting Mastercard. The objective is to fundamentally transform payments and the very nature of money itself, a move referred to by MoonPay CEO Ivan Soto-Wright as “backwards compatibility,” as it extends the use of crypto beyond its initial applications.

Regarding regulations, Mastercard acknowledges the various legislative efforts around the world, including the American GENIUS Act, European MiCA, Singaporean Payment Services Act, UAE’s Law No. (4) of 2022, and Hong Kong’s drafted ASPIRe legislation. These regulations support the legal use of stablecoins, mitigating the constraints of restrictive securities laws while implementing protective measures to combat money laundering and other illicit activities. It appears that Mastercard was awaiting federal-level crypto adoption in the U.S. before expanding its crypto acceptance aggressively.

However, the GENIUS Act has not been universally well-received in the U.S. Some Democrats argue that while the legislation includes certain protections, it lacks mechanisms to prevent the misuse of cryptocurrencies by top officials for corrupt purposes. Nevertheless, Mastercard appears determined not to let such concerns impede their progress toward mass adoption of digital assets.

India’s Economy Steady Despite Global Uncertainties, Central Bank Reports

India’s economy remains resilient despite global geopolitical tensions and trade uncertainties, according to the Reserve Bank of India.

India’s economy is showing signs of resilience against the backdrop of global fluctuations, as the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) elaborated in its monthly bulletin released on Wednesday. The central bank highlighted India’s ability to withstand international challenges, such as geopolitical tensions and trade uncertainties.

Last month, the RBI made a significant move by reducing its key policy rate by an unexpected 50 basis points and lowering the cash reserve ratio for banks. These changes were possible due to low inflation, which offered the bank the flexibility to prioritize growth amid unpredictable global conditions. India’s economic activity has remained steady, the bulletin noted, supported by favorable prospects for summer-sown crops, robust momentum in the services sector, and moderate growth in industrial activity.

The report also pointed out that “high-frequency indicators suggest stability in aggregate demand,” signaling a positive outlook for India’s economic prospects. Retail inflation in the country dropped to 2.10% in June, marking a six-year low and further contributing to positive economic sentiment.

Additional factors propelling economic stability included “de-escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and optimism on trade deals,” as well as a relaxation in regulatory norms for infrastructure financing, which collectively improved financial market sentiment in the latter part of June.

Despite these optimistic indicators, the bulletin also highlighted that domestic investor sentiment was cautious in the first half of July. This caution was attributed to ongoing uncertainty over a potential trade agreement between India and the United States and mixed corporate earnings for the quarter ending in June.

The RBI’s insights into India’s economic resilience underscore the country’s ability to navigate complex international challenges while maintaining domestic stability and growth.

Dalai Lama Inaugurates KarGön Mega Summer Symposium

Amidst a backdrop of inclement weather and eager anticipation, His Holiness the Dalai Lama inaugurated the prestigious Kargon Mega Summer Symposium in Zanskar, Ladakh, to the delight of thousands who gathered to extend their heartfelt welcome.

After a two-day delay due to poor weather conditions that hindered travel between Leh and Zanskar, His Holiness the Dalai Lama managed to arrive in Padum by helicopter. Upon his arrival, he was warmly received at the helipad by the locals of Zanskar and formally welcomed by key officials including the District Commissioner of Kargil, Rakesh Kumar, the Senior Superintendent of Police, and three councillors from the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council.

His Holiness expressed his gratitude to the helicopter’s pilot and copilot for a comfortable journey and posed for photographs with them. He then traveled by car to the newly established Karsha Phodrang (KarGön Palace), where thousands of admirers lined the route, joyfully welcoming the revered leader with smiles and waves.

The Chief Executive Councilor of the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council, Tashi Gyalson, joined the gathering at the temple, paying respects to the Tulkus before taking his seat. Traditional sounds of horns, drums, and cymbals announced the arrival of the Dalai Lama, who was welcomed by the Abbot of Karsha Monastery, Sonam Dorje, and was invited to inaugurate the new building with prayers and a ceremonial tossing of grain.

The event was marked by a verse of welcome expressing the hope for happiness and longevity for His Holiness. Prominent religious figures, including Thiksey Rinpoché and the Sharpa Chöjé Rinpoché, were in attendance, further highlighting the significance of the occasion.

Geshe Losang Tsephel, Chair of the Organizing Committee of the Summer Mega Symposium, praised His Holiness for gracing the event and acknowledged the support of the council and the Kargil DC. The symposium’s educational mission aligns with His Holiness’s advice for monastic and secular institutions to actively engage with classic texts.

As part of their curriculum, schoolchildren in the region are now regularly studying ‘mind and awareness,’ along with ‘logic and reasoning,’ underscoring the symposium’s broader educational impact.

Rakesh Kumar, the Kargil District Commissioner, addressed the audience, extending his respects to His Holiness and commendations to the symposium’s participants. During a demonstration, students showcased their debating skills, highlighting lessons learned from seminal texts such as Nagarjuna’s ‘Root Wisdom.’

The morning’s formalities concluded with participants and guests receiving blessings from the Dalai Lama, after which he spoke to the assembly about his enduring commitment to the teachings of Buddhism, emphasizing the utility of logic and reason within the tradition.

His Holiness reflected on his personal journey from Tibet, the challenges posed by Chinese governance, and the resilience shown by preserving Buddhist traditions in exile. His insights illuminated how logical and reasoned approaches can enhance both religious study and broader understanding.

The Dalai Lama’s address resonated with attendees, and children from the Rainbow School celebrated by performing songs in his honor, underscoring their gratitude for his presence at the inauguration of the new Karsha Phodrang.

Zanskari women, donned in traditional attire, added to the festivities through song and dance, celebrating the cultural richness of the region.

The event concluded with words of thanks from the chief organizer, who acknowledged the efforts made and funds raised to realize the vision of the Karsha Phodrang, emphasizing the collective gratitude toward His Holiness for his invaluable presence and support.

According to Tibet.net, the day’s proceedings were an embodiment of unity and cultural pride, enriched by the Dalai Lama’s teachings.

USA Takes Second in 66th International Mathematical Olympiad

The United States team, sponsored by the Mathematical Association of America, has secured second place in the 66th International Mathematical Olympiad, earning five gold medals and one silver in the highly competitive event held in Australia.

The United States team achieved an outstanding performance at the 66th International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO), hosted on the Sunshine Coast of Australia from July 10 to July 20, 2025. Sponsored by the Mathematical Association of America (MAA), the team earned second place overall, with an impressive score of 216 points.

The IMO is renowned as the world’s premier mathematics competition for high school students, attracting young mathematicians from every corner of the globe. In this year’s edition, 110 countries were represented by 630 students, all competing to solve six challenging mathematical problems.

Of the six talented members of the US team, five secured gold medals while one won a silver, highlighting their exceptional problem-solving skills. Notably, team members Tiger Zhang and Alexander Wang ranked in the top ten individual scorers, underscoring the level of their mathematical prowess.

Comprising the 2025 USA IMO team were: Hannah Fox, 17, from California; Karn Chutinan, 18, from Massachusetts; Andrew Lin, 18, from New Jersey; Alexander Wang, 17, also from New Jersey; Qiao (Tiger) Zhang, 17, from California; and Ruilin (Calvin) Wang, 17, from Virginia.

Hannah Fox’s participation is especially significant, marking the second consecutive year a young woman was included in the USA IMO team. Her achievement was further celebrated with the Maryam Mirzakhani medal, awarded to the top female scorer in the Americas region.

The team benefited from expert guidance under head coach John Berman and deputy coach Yang Liu. Both played crucial roles in the intense training regimen at the MAA Mathematical Olympiad Summer Program, preparing the students for the rigors of international competition.

Students aspiring to join the USA IMO team must first succeed in a series of competitions organized by the MAA American Mathematics Competitions. These events are part of a broader initiative that sees roughly 300,000 K-12 students from over 6,000 schools and learning centers participating annually.

The success of this year’s team was generously supported by Jane Street, which contributed resources to facilitate the team’s journey to the Olympiad.

Further details about the MAA American Mathematics Competitions, including information on hosting a competition or getting involved, can be found through the formal channels of the MAA.

This remarkable achievement at the 66th International Mathematical Olympiad underscores the dedication and skill of the US team, reinforcing their position as leaders on the global stage in mathematical challenges.

Obama Responds to Trump’s Call for Prosecution

In an unusual move, former President Barack Obama has publicly refuted allegations by Donald Trump that he attempted to orchestrate a coup following Trump’s 2016 election victory.

Barack Obama has stepped forward to confront accusations made by Donald Trump, who claimed that the former president orchestrated a coup against him after the 2016 presidential election. Obama’s office issued a rare and emphatic statement dismissing Trump’s allegations as “outrageous” and “a weak attempt at distraction.”

The statement was released after Trump alleged that Obama was guilty of treason for purportedly leading an effort to fabricate evidence of Russian interference in the election. This accusation was part of Trump’s comments during a meeting at the White House with Ferdinand Marcos Jr., the president of the Philippines and son of the country’s former autocratic leader.

“Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,” the statement from Obama’s office read. “But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.”

The controversy escalated following an 11-page document released by Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence. The document claimed there was a “treasonous conspiracy” among Obama-era national security officials, and recommended their prosecution.

Obama’s office responded by highlighting the conclusions of several intelligence assessments that found Russia did influence the 2016 election, but did not manipulate vote tallies. The findings, originally supported by a 2020 report from the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio, maintained that Russia’s interference aimed to damage Hillary Clinton’s campaign, not alter voting results.

The Gabbard report suggested otherwise, claiming that Obama’s administration had coerced intelligence agencies to modify their conclusions. The report conflated different issues in an attempt to undermine the intelligence community’s assessment, made public in 2017, which indicated Russian efforts to help Trump while harming Clinton.

During the White House meeting, Trump accused Obama as the leader of this supposed conspiracy, implicating other officials such as James Comey, the former FBI director, and James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence. He described the alleged actions as treasonous and accused Obama of attempting to “steal” and “obfuscate” the election.

Trump also mentioned that Gabbard had assured him that more documents would soon be available. However, critics have pointed out that the report misrepresented crucial aspects of the assessments and failed to alter the core finding that Russia intervened in the election.

A former CIA analyst, Fulton Armstrong, criticized Gabbard’s report, stating that it was crafted to reach a predetermined conclusion. Armstrong described the document as sloppy and manipulative, dismissing references to so-called “deep state officials” as amateurish and weakening the report’s credibility.

Assertions of Russian interference were further corroborated by special counsel Robert Mueller’s 2019 report and the bipartisan Senate intelligence committee’s report led by Marco Rubio the following year. Despite this, Gabbard’s document attempted to discredit these findings through misleading comparisons and conclusions.

According to The Guardian, the document used language that confused confidence levels with probability in intelligence assessments to present a one-sided narrative intended to support its claims.

Source: Original article

US Withdraws from UNESCO Again Under Trump’s Leadership

President Donald Trump has announced the United States will withdraw from UNESCO, the U.N. cultural and education agency, repeating a decision he made during his first term.

President Donald Trump has announced that the United States will exit the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) at the end of 2025, marking the second time he has taken such a step. The decision echoes his actions during his first term, which were later reversed by former President Joe Biden.

The White House explained the departure as part of the Trump administration’s “America first” foreign policy, expressing skepticism toward multilateral organizations such as the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, and NATO. White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly criticized UNESCO for supporting “woke” and “divisive” cultural causes that clash with what she termed “commonsense policies” favored by American voters.

The State Department further accused UNESCO of promoting a “globalist, ideological agenda” that is inconsistent with the Trump administration’s foreign policy. A significant point of contention was UNESCO’s 2011 decision to admit the Palestinians as a member state, which the U.S. deemed problematic and contributing to anti-Israel sentiment.

UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay expressed regret over the U.S. decision but noted the organization was prepared for the possibility. She emphasized that UNESCO had diversified its funding sources, with the U.S. providing only about 8% of its budget.

French President Emmanuel Macron reaffirmed strong support for UNESCO, calling it a “universal protector” of world heritage, while condemning the U.S. decision as a blow to multilateralism.

UNESCO officials indicated that the U.S. withdrawal is expected to have a limited impact on U.S.-funded programs. However, Israel welcomed Washington’s move, with U.N. ambassador Danny Danon criticizing UNESCO for perceived biases against Israel. Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar thanked the U.S. for its “moral support and leadership” in addressing what he described as the politicization and singling out of Israel within U.N. agencies.

Conversely, U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a senior Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, labeled Trump’s decision as “short-sighted” and warned it could bolster China’s influence, which grew within UNESCO after Trump’s initial withdrawal.

Azoulay asserted that the issues cited by the U.S. for its withdrawal were outdated and failed to recognize UNESCO’s efforts in promoting Holocaust education and countering antisemitism. She described the organization as a rare forum for multilateralism focused on consensus and action.

UNESCO, established after World War II to foster peace through international cooperation in education, science, and culture, is renowned for designating World Heritage Sites. In the U.S., designated sites include the Grand Canyon and the Statue of Liberty, among others. The agency highlights 1,248 global locations of “outstanding universal value.”

The U.S. has had a complex history with UNESCO, having first withdrawn in 1984 under President Ronald Reagan amid accusations of financial mismanagement and anti-U.S. bias. The U.S. rejoined in 2003 under President George W. Bush, though funding was halted in 2011 following UNESCO’s vote to grant full membership to the Palestinians. Trump’s first term saw another withdrawal in 2017 over accusations of anti-Israeli bias, a decision reversed by Biden in 2023.

Source: Original article

US Food Insecurity Doubles Since 2021 Amid Economic Disparity Concerns

Amid economic prosperity, an increasing number of Americans are battling food insecurity, with recent data revealing that 15.6% of U.S. adults lacked sufficient food sometime in May, almost double from 2021.

The United States, despite being an economic powerhouse, faces a growing challenge as more citizens struggle to afford basic necessities like food. This alarming trend has been brought to light by new findings from Morning Consult, reported by Axios, which show a significant rise in the number of U.S. adults experiencing food scarcity.

In May, 15.6% of adults in the U.S. reported they sometimes or often did not have enough to eat, marking a nearly 100% increase from two years ago. Back in 2021, expanded benefits such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and an enhanced Child Tax Credit contributed to improving food access. However, the rollback of these supports has coincided with worsening food security for many.

John Leer, Chief Economist at Morning Consult, highlighted the widening gap between flourishing financial markets and the reality many Americans face daily. “There’s such a disconnect now between record highs on Wall Street and elevated levels of food insecurity,” Leer remarked in the report.

Philadelphia’s Share Food Program, a significant food bank network in the area, has observed a 120% surge in demand for food over the past three years. Program Director George Matysik noted that the need began rising as federal aid started decreasing in 2022. He expressed concern that the recent SNAP cuts approved by Congress could further exacerbate the situation. The Urban Institute’s research suggests that the reconciliation package could cause 22.3 million families to lose all or part of their SNAP benefits.

The spike in food insecurity accompanies a broader increase in living costs. Food prices, according to the Consumer Price Index, have climbed 26% over the last five years, with the USDA anticipating a further 2.9% rise in 2025. Inflation isn’t limited to groceries, affecting everything from rent to utilities and transportation, thereby eroding purchasing power for many households.

To combat rising costs, consumers are urged to be vigilant with their budgets. Reducing major expenses, such as car insurance, by comparing various options can help ease financial strains. Forbes reports the average cost of full-coverage auto insurance as $2,149 per year, though significant savings can be found by comparing quotes from different insurers.

Technological solutions like the Upside cash-back app provide additional avenues for savings, enabling users to earn cash-back on essential purchases like gas, groceries, and dining. Such strategies assist in managing the impact of inflation on household finances.

Investors concerned with protecting their assets from inflation often turn to traditional safeguards such as gold. Unlike fiat currency, gold cannot be produced in unlimited quantities and is viewed as a stable investment during economic uncertainties. Over the past year, gold prices have surged over 35%, emphasizing its value as an investment.

Financial expert Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, the world’s largest hedge fund, acknowledged gold’s role in a well-rounded investment portfolio, calling it an “effective diversifier” during economic downturns. Investors looking for tax advantages can consider opening a gold IRA through services like Priority Gold, which facilitate holding physical gold within retirement accounts.

Real estate also remains a popular hedge against inflation. As property values and rental incomes often rise with inflation, real estate investments can provide a reliable income stream. The S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index reports a more than 50% increase over the last five years, reflecting the sector’s resilience.

Crowdfunding platforms, such as Arrived, now offer easy access to the real estate market, allowing investors to purchase shares in rental properties with relatively small investments. Supported by high-profile investors like Jeff Bezos, Arrived simplifies the process by letting users select pre-vetted properties to invest in, offering an opportunity for income generation without the traditional burdens of property ownership.

This multifaceted approach to managing personal finances amid economic challenges provides a roadmap for maintaining stability and growth, even as larger structural inequities persist.

According to Axios, these revelations underline a critical disconnect between financial indices and the lived realities of millions of Americans grappling with basic needs.

Source: Original article

Winnie Varghese Becomes First Woman Dean of St. John’s

The Rev. Winnie Varghese has become the first woman elected to lead the Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine in New York City, marking a significant milestone for diversity and inclusion within the Episcopal Church.

The announcement of Varghese’s appointment as dean was marked by her emotional moment on the steps of the historic cathedral, a place that has loomed large in her imagination since her childhood in Dallas. Reflecting on her new role, Varghese expressed her awe at the responsibility and the vision she holds for the church community.

“What a beautiful responsibility it is to have to think about how to care for people and how to care for community,” Varghese remarked during an interview on July 14. Her involvement with the cathedral began with its evocative depiction in a local newspaper article she read at age 12, which introduced her to its vibrant St. Francis Day celebration.

Varghese officially assumed her new role as dean on July 1, becoming the first woman to lead the largest Episcopal cathedral in the U.S. The appointment of Varghese, a queer woman of Indian descent, signifies the Episcopal Church’s ongoing commitment to progressive values, particularly regarding LGBTQ inclusion and racial justice.

A prominent voice in support of marginalized communities, Varghese has been active in advocating for LGBTQ+ rights and racial equality and has served as a rector in New York City and Atlanta. Her leadership qualities are well recognized, reflecting the Episcopal Church’s intention to widen its embrace of diversity.

The Rev. Kelly Brown Douglas, who co-chaired the search committee for the dean, hailed Varghese as a trailblazer. Douglas emphasized the impact of Varghese’s competence and strength, stating that her leadership would break new grounds for the church.

Prior to her appointment as dean, Varghese served as rector of St. Luke’s Episcopal Church in Atlanta. Her journey in ministry has been marked by firsts and challenges, stepping into roles typically not envisioned for a queer woman of color within the church. According to statistics from the Church Pension Group from 2011 to 2021, only a small fraction of Episcopal priests were women of color.

The journey has come with unexpected hurdles. Varghese recalled past struggles in embracing her identity within the church, further underscoring the significance of her current role. Ordained in 2000, she has been a pioneering figure, reshaping traditional perceptions and practices within her communities.

The position of dean at St. John the Divine is not without challenges, as Varghese steps into her role during a politically charged environment in New York. Issues such as immigration policies and declining church attendance weigh heavily on religious leaders across the city. Varghese is familiar with these challenges, having previously addressed them in her role at St. Mark’s Church in-the-Bowery.

Her approach involves fostering a sense of outreach and welcome, encouraging parishioners to engage with their broader community. The vision of church as an inclusive, inviting space is core to her leadership philosophy as she takes on the task of revitalizing the cathedral’s congregational life.

The Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine, with its storied history intertwined with New York City’s cultural landscape, seeks to continue its tradition of being a hub for music, art, and social engagement. It has been a venue for various artistic presentations, from contemporary art installations to music performances.

In her role, Varghese will also oversee the upkeep of the cathedral’s expansive and unfinished structure. Significant projects, such as the $4 million restoration of the cathedral’s west wall, are underway. Varghese is committed to sustaining the physical and spiritual vibrancy of the cathedral, inviting supporters to invest in its mission.

Her ultimate goal is to continue building on the legacy of St. John the Divine, ensuring the cathedral remains a space of reflection, tradition, and opportunity. On September 27, Varghese will be formally installed as the dean, followed by leading the annual St. Francis Day Blessing of the Animals, embodying the cathedral’s tradition of openness and celebration.

Earth’s Spin on July 22 Creates 2nd-Shortest Day in History

On Tuesday, July 22, Earth will complete its rotation 1.34 milliseconds faster than usual, marking one of the shortest days in recorded history.

Earth’s rotation on July 22 will fall short of the standard 24-hour day by a mere 1.34 milliseconds. While this variance is too slight to be noticed in daily life, it forms part of a curious trend in Earth’s rotational dynamics that has emerged over the past few years. Some scientists suggest that, if this pattern persists, a negative leap second could become necessary around the year 2029—a correction unprecedented in atomic clockkeeping.

The planet’s rotation speed has never been constant. Historical data indicate that a day was much shorter in the distant past than the 86,400 seconds we are familiar with today. A 2023 study revealed that, for a significant period in Earth’s early history, each day lasted approximately 19 hours. This shift resulted from influences such as solar atmospheric tides and lunar ocean tides. Over extensive geological timescales, tidal friction from the moon has emerged as the primary factor gradually elongating Earth’s days. As the moon moves further away, it exerts less gravitational pull, effectively draining Earth’s rotational energy and slowing its spin rate.

Since the advent of the atomic clock in 1973, the shortest recorded day was just 1.05 milliseconds less than 24 hours, according to data from Timeanddate.com. Remarkably, since 2020, Earth has consistently set new records for rotational speed. Specifically, on July 5, 2024, Earth’s spin concluded 1.66 milliseconds sooner than typical, making it the shortest day documented thus far.

Current scientific forecasts for 2025 identified July 9, July 22, and August 5 as potential candidates for the year’s shortest days. Nonetheless, recent measurements now place July 10 in the lead, with a reduction of 1.36 milliseconds from the normal 24-hour period. On July 22, Earth’s rotation is anticipated to end 1.34 milliseconds early, clinching the position for the second-shortest day of the year in 2025. If existing trends persist, August 5 is expected to end roughly 1.25 milliseconds sooner than usual.

There is emerging evidence suggesting that this acceleration may be slowing. Preliminary observations indicate a deceleration in the rate at which day lengths are decreasing, but the root cause of the recent rotational modifications remains largely unknown. A 2024 study proposed that factors like polar ice melt and rising sea levels might be impacting Earth’s rotation by altering mass distribution. However, these factors may not be primary drivers of the acceleration. Another plausible explanation points toward influences deep within Earth: the deceleration of its liquid core could be redistributing angular momentum, causing the mantle and crust to spin slightly faster.

Leonid Zotov, an expert on Earth rotation from Moscow State University, commented on the mystery of this acceleration to Timeanddate.com. “Most scientists believe it is something inside the Earth. Ocean and atmospheric models don’t explain this huge acceleration.” Zotov also predicts that Earth’s rotation could slow again soon. If his prediction holds true, this quickening might merely represent a transient deviation in Earth’s long-term trajectory toward slower rotation and elongated days.

CBO: GOP Bill Adds $3.4T Deficit, 10M Lose Insurance

President Donald Trump’s megabill, signed on July 4, is projected to increase the federal deficit by $3.4 trillion and result in 10 million people losing health insurance over the next decade, according to a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report.

The CBO released its final analysis on Monday, detailing the impact of the newly enacted legislation on the national debt and U.S. households. The structure of the bill, primarily a permanent extension of the 2017 tax cuts, is expected to significantly reduce incoming federal revenue while contributing to a marked increase in the deficit. The bill was a key legislative achievement for President Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress.

The primary driver of the mounting deficit is the GOP’s decision to maintain the tax cuts from Trump’s first term, which the Senate Finance Committee projects will decrease tax revenue by approximately $4.5 trillion. This figure also incorporates additional GOP-backed tax cuts that were introduced during the Senate floor debates.

The CBO’s report indicates that while the legislation will cut more than $1 trillion in federal healthcare spending—with the majority of cuts targeting Medicaid—the savings will not offset the costs of the package. The anticipated increase in the deficit highlights the imbalance between the package’s financial outflow and the savings from health expenditure reductions.

Additionally, the CBO predicts that 10 million people will lose their health insurance as a result of these legislative changes. This estimation marks a slight improvement from prior figures, which predicted that 11.8 million people would lose coverage. The updated numbers reflect the removal of a previous policy that would have caused an estimated 1.4 million undocumented immigrants to lose health insurance.

The CBO also provided additional insights into the bill’s impact on agricultural policies. Negotiations spearheaded by Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska led to a softening of initial requirements that would have compelled states to bear more costs related to SNAP, a key U.S. food assistance program. These modifications, along with cuts to federal agriculture spending, are projected to result in $120 billion in savings over the coming decade.

The bill initially contained provisions aimed at penalizing states that offer healthcare to undocumented immigrants, despite federal prohibitions on Medicaid coverage for this demographic. However, due to objections from the Senate parliamentarian, a controversial element that would have withdrawn funding from states that expanded Medicaid under the Democrats’ 2010 health law was removed from the final version.

In an alternate analysis requested by Senate Republicans, the CBO used a new accounting method that does not factor in the cost of permanently extending the 2017 tax cuts. Under this method, the projected increase in the federal deficit is limited to $366 billion. Republicans argue that utilizing traditional accounting methods presents a bias against maintaining existing tax rates, which they perceive as amounting to tax increases if not extended.

This controversial legislative package continues to be a subject of intense debate, with significant political and financial implications for the country, as outlined in the comprehensive report from the Congressional Budget Office.

Vice President Dhankhar Resigns Due to Health Concerns

Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar, who was elected as India’s 14th Vice President in August 2022, resigned citing health reasons on the first day of the Monsoon Session.

Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar announced his resignation on Monday, July 21, 2025, citing health concerns. The unexpected move came on the first day of the Monsoon Session while he was presiding over the Rajya Sabha as Chairman.

Dhankhar, 74, had two years remaining in his term after being elected in August 2022 as the 14th Vice President of India. He follows the precedent of two previous Vice Presidents, V.V. Giri in 1969 and R. Venkatraman in 1987, who resigned before their terms ended to assume the presidency.

In a resignation letter addressed to President Droupadi Murmu, and shared on his official “X” account, Dhankhar stated, “To prioritize health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as the Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the Constitution.”

The letter further expressed Dhankhar’s gratitude towards Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Council of Ministers, and the members of Parliament for their “warmth, trust, and affection.” This announcement took many by surprise, as he actively participated in parliamentary duties, including presiding over a session involving the motion for the removal of High Court judge Yashwant Varma the same day.

Dhankhar continued engaging with MPs and leadership until the evening but did not return for the subsequent post-lunch session. Reports from sources suggest he is unlikely to attend the Rajya Sabha on the following day. His resignation followed a significant health event in March, a cardiac issue from which he was believed to have recovered fully, enabling him to resume his duties thereafter.

Prior to serving as Vice President, Dhankhar was the Governor of West Bengal. His tenure as Vice President saw him dealing with critical issues, often marked by his forthright public speeches. Notably, he emphasized the necessity of dialogue with farmers during protests in late 2024, sharing a platform with Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan to advocate for open communication with the farming community.

Dhankhar’s term also witnessed friction with opposition parties. In December 2024, Deputy Chairperson of the Rajya Sabha, Harivansh, dismissed an impeachment motion against Dhankhar filed by the opposition, labeling it as a deterrent to the dignity of constitutional authorities.

As Vice President, Dhankhar was known to be vocal, often stepping into the political spotlight, yet maintaining a focus on issues pertinent to his rural upbringing. Despite his sudden resignation, he left an indelible mark through his advocacy and commitment to public discourse.

As of the time of this report, President Murmu had not publicly responded to or confirmed her acceptance of Dhankhar’s resignation.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Closes EPA’s Scientific Research Division

The Trump administration is planning significant changes to the Environmental Protection Agency, including the closure of its scientific research arm, as part of a broader federal downsizing effort.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced plans to close its Office of Research and Development, the department tasked with providing critical expertise for environmental policies and regulations. This move is part of the Trump administration’s larger effort to downsize the federal government.

The Office of Research and Development plays a pivotal role in analyzing dangers related to toxic chemicals, climate change, smog, wildfires, indoor air pollutants, water contamination, watershed destruction, and drinking water safety. The office is also responsible for managing grant programs that support research at universities and private companies.

“Under President Trump’s leadership, EPA has taken a close look at our operations to ensure the agency is better equipped than ever to deliver on our core mission of protecting human health and the environment while powering the great American comeback,” stated EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin. He announced the plan on Friday, emphasizing that “this reduction in force will ensure we can better fulfill that mission while being responsible stewards of your hard-earned tax dollars.”

The downsizing, which forms part of a broader strategy to reduce the EPA’s workforce by 23%, is estimated to save approximately $748.8 million. The savings, according to the agency, will be reallocated to enhance “laboratory functions and hundreds of scientific, technical, bioinformatic, and information technology experts” within the EPA’s air, water, and chemical offices. These offices are home to thousands of scientists and engineers employed by the EPA.

Alongside these changes, the EPA also announced plans to establish a new “Office of Applied Science and Environmental Solutions”. The new office aims to prioritize research and science prominently in rulemaking processes and provide technical assistance to states.

While no layoffs have occurred yet, the EPA confirmed that some employees are being reassigned, and job cuts may be the next step. “That is the next step in the process,” the EPA commented in a statement to NPR.

The proposed changes have been met with strong criticism from several quarters. Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, ranking member on the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, denounced the planned cuts. “Administrator Zeldin has finally confirmed what he has denied for months and months — the destruction of the Office of Research and Development,” she said. Lofgren argued that the Trump administration is dismissing dedicated scientists while appointing political figures whose roles are to mislead Congress and the public. “The obliteration of ORD will have generational impacts on Americans’ health and safety. This is a travesty.”

Kyla Bennett, director of science policy for the nonprofit Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), also voiced concerns. Bennett argued that eliminating the ORD will severely impair the EPA’s research capabilities and hinder its ability to utilize studies from other scientists. “This [reduction in force], together with the slashing of travel and training budgets, will leave EPA flying blind and unable to use the best available science. These short-sighted cuts will ultimately affect every American, and it is despicable,” she stated.

In contrast, the American Chemistry Council, representing chemical manufacturers, backed the EPA’s decision to review its resources. The council stressed the importance of ensuring taxpayer money is utilized efficiently and effectively to meet the agency’s legal obligations. “If necessary, that includes shifting resources from certain offices,” the organization commented.

The implications of the EPA’s restructuring remain to be fully understood, but the debate highlights significant divisions over the administration’s approach to environmental research and regulatory functions.

Source: Original article

Many Teens Use AI for Chatting, Prefer Human Interaction

Nearly three-quarters of U.S. teenagers have interacted with AI tools, using them for activities such as advice seeking, flirting, and deep conversations, a new study reveals.

Teenagers have traditionally turned to each other for advice, flirting, and sharing profound conversations. However, a new study indicates that nearly 75% of U.S. teens have used artificial intelligence (AI) tools for these activities at least once.

Conversational AI systems like CHAI, Character.AI, Nomi, and Replika present compelling opportunities for teens to engage in role-playing, seek support for mental health issues, or simply chat. The nationwide study, released by Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization focused on media reviews and research funding for young people, highlights these tools as “digital friends or characters you can text or talk with whenever you want.” These AI companions are distinguished from AI assistants, image generators, or academic help tools.

The findings reveal that over half—52%—of teenagers use AI companions regularly, engaging with them at least a few times each month. “They’re using them for entertainment purposes, out of curiosity,” said Michael Robb, head of research at Common Sense Media. “Despite this, teens still spend more time with real friends and find human conversations more satisfying. But if you scratch the surface, some alarming trends emerge.”

For instance, one-third of teens surveyed admitted to having serious discussions with AI companions instead of real people at least once. Approximately the same percentage have found AI interactions just as, if not more, satisfying than conversations with humans.

Adolescence is critical for developing social, critical thinking, and emotional regulation skills. With an average screen time of 8 hours and 39 minutes daily, according to Common Sense Media, the study’s authors express concern about the influence of AI companions in teens’ digital landscapes. About 25% of the teens surveyed shared personal information, such as their name and location, with AI companions—tools designed to collect user data. Some AI platforms are marketed to audiences as young as 13, though age restrictions are often easily bypassed by young people.

A third of teens reported feeling uncomfortable during interactions with AI companions, troubled by something said or done by the AI. Nonetheless, many teenagers approach AI companions pragmatically; about half of the respondents expressed distrust in the information or advice from AI companions, with younger teens being more trusting by a margin of seven percentage points.

The vast majority of teenagers, 80%, still prioritize human friendships over AI interactions. Common Sense Media recommends that individuals under 18 avoid using AI companions altogether due to the risks involved and the potential for addictive behavior. “I’m not necessarily confident that the companies behind these companions have teens’ well-being in mind,” Robb stated. “If these companions were designed to promote well-being, rather than to capture attention and collect personal information, we might be having a different conversation.”

According to NPR, these findings spotlight the complex dynamics at play as AI tools become an integral part of teenagers’ lives, warranting attention from parents, educators, and technology developers alike.

Trump Supports Gabbard on Obama Prosecution, Criticizes Alleged Election Fraud

In a July 2025 social media post, former President Donald Trump endorsed Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s push for prosecution of former President Barack Obama and key officials for allegedly orchestrating election fraud during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Former President Donald Trump, using his platform on Truth Social, reiterated his claims on July 19, 2025, that former President Barack Obama and his associates were involved in a “treasonous conspiracy” aimed at undermining his 2016 election victory. Trump praised Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard for her role in exposing alleged election fraud and encouraged her to continue pushing for criminal charges against Obama and top officials.

Gabbard released a 114-page declassified report on July 18, detailing accusations against members of Obama’s national security team, including James Clapper, John Brennan, James Comey, and Susan Rice. She alleged that these individuals manipulated intelligence to falsely suggest that Russian interference had favored Trump in the election.

The report cites documents such as a December 7, 2016, memo stating that no cyberattacks altered the election outcome. Gabbard claims that a White House meeting held on December 9, 2016, resulted in a January 2017 intelligence report that wrongly attributed Trump’s victory to Russian interference, subsequently leading to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

The report and its conclusions, however, face significant counterarguments. Previous investigations, including a 2020 bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee, identified “irrefutable evidence” of Russia’s attempts to support Trump, without any indication of fabricated intelligence. Mueller’s 2019 report also described Russia’s interference as “sweeping and systematic,” yet found no evidence of collusion by Trump’s campaign.

Democratic leaders have dismissed Gabbard’s allegations as lacking in foundation. Senator Mark Warner, a senior member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, noted that the 2017 intelligence community assessment was the outcome of a comprehensive three-year investigation. Representative Jim Himes, a Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, labeled the claims of treason as “baseless” due to the absence of credible investigative support.

Furthermore, a review conducted by CIA Director John Ratcliffe maintained the intelligence community’s assessment of Russia’s pro-Trump actions, even while criticizing some methods used in 2017. Gabbard’s expertise in intelligence has also been called into question amid criticism of her report.

The timing of these allegations coincides with increasing scrutiny on the White House regarding its management of Jeffrey Epstein’s files. On July 18, Trump directed Attorney General Pamela Bondi to unseal grand jury testimony tied to Epstein, amid pressure from his political base for a supposed “client list,” which the Department of Justice claims does not exist. Critics argue that Gabbard’s election fraud allegations are intended to divert attention from the Epstein controversy, which includes resurfaced images of Trump with Epstein from the 1990s and a recent report by the Wall Street Journal suggesting a suggestive 2003 letter from Trump.

The release of Gabbard’s report shortly after the Wall Street Journal’s story has prompted speculation that the administration is aiming to redirect public and media focus from the Epstein-related issues to past political disputes.

Democrats’ Poll Standing at Trump’s Six-Month Mark

Recent polls provide a complex picture for Democrats as they face challenges in regaining voter trust following a significant loss to President Trump in the last election.

Despite recent notable election victories, Democrats have struggled to distance themselves from the Republican Party as they look toward the upcoming midterms. Data experts suggest that while the party’s position has somewhat improved since Trump began his second term, much work remains to convince the American public and regain control of the House.

“You can’t just be on the attack. You can’t beat something with nothing,” said Democratic pollster Celinda Lake. “We have to show and tell what we would do, but I think that we’re on the precipice of a big opportunity, and I hope we take advantage of it.”

After losing ground when Trump swept all seven battleground states and the GOP gained control of Congress, Democrats are focusing on rebuilding. However, data on the party’s standing remains less than encouraging halfway through Trump’s first year back in office.

The Democratic Party continues to experience historically low favorability ratings. According to a YouGov average, the party’s favorability was over 20 points underwater as of late May. A CNN poll released recently found only 28% of surveyed Americans view the party favorably, a low not seen since CNN began the poll in 1992. While the Republican Party’s ratings aren’t much better, they haven’t reached the same depths.

A poll conducted by the Democratic super PAC Unite the Country revealed that voters perceive the party as “out of touch,” “woke,” and “weak.” An AP-NORC poll found a divide among party members, with just a third of Democrats optimistic about the party’s future, down from 57% last July.

Survey results highlight widespread frustration with Democratic leaders and a belief that they are not effectively countering the Trump administration. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is a particular focus, with mid-to-upper 20s approval ratings during Trump’s second term, though his net favorability has recently improved slightly.

Scott Tranter, director of data science for Decision Desk HQ (DDHQ), noted that Democrats are struggling to form a coherent message and lack a clear “rallying cry.” Some Democrats have drawn attention, either through confrontations with Trump officials or visits to detention centers like “Alligator Alcatraz” in Florida, but Schumer is still seen as lacking the gravitas of a strong party leader.

One ongoing trend is the absence of a defined Democratic Party leader following the 2024 election defeat. A March CNN poll found that 30% of Democrats couldn’t name a leader reflecting the party’s core values, with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) receiving the most support at only 10%. Former Vice President Kamala Harris was supported by 9%, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) by 8%.

An Emerson College poll shows a wide split among Democrats about preferred 2028 presidential contenders, with the leading candidate only garnering 16% support. Tranter indicated that such disarray is typical after a major election loss, comparing the situation to the post-loss transformations of Democrats in 2005 and Republicans in 2013.

“Coming out of Kerry, the Democrats were also in the wilderness,” he said. “And so I think that the takeaway is that every time something like this happens, each party goes through its transformation. I think we’re still pretty early on [in] it.”

Yet, there’s a silver lining for the Democrats in the data. Trump’s approval and favorability ratings remain underwater, which provides Democrats a potential opening. Democrats also hold a small lead in DDHQ’s generic congressional ballot average as of early March, a margin that continues to hover at a few points.

The same CNN poll that highlighted the Democrats’ low favorability also showed party members are more motivated to vote in the next year’s midterms. A Republican pollster Fabrizio Ward’s survey found Republicans trailing in the generic ballot across 28 battleground House districts. Moreover, Democrats are hopeful that opposing Trump’s recent “big beautiful bill” may provide the needed boost for their base before the midterms.

Ryan O’Donnell, interim executive director at Data for Progress, noted Trump’s focus on unpopular policies potentially benefits Democrats going into the midterms. However, he warned that Democrats also must listen to voter concerns and propose real solutions to improve quality of life and affordability.

Lake emphasized the lack of a clear leader could become an asset, with a crowded field in 2028 showcasing what the Democratic alternative to Trump could look like. However, finding and establishing a few strong leaders has been slow, and she doubts this will be “fixed” before the 2026 midterms. She encourages the party to present a unified voice with a strong economic message addressing who they will fight for.

Finally, a partnered poll between Lake’s firm and the Democratic donor network Way to Win surveyed those who voted for President Biden in 2020 but abstained in 2024. The findings showed these voters leaned Democratic if the midterms were held today and felt discontent about Medicaid cuts and stagnant living costs.

Jenifer Fernandez Ancona, the co-founder and vice president of Way to Win, stated that these concerns offer the party a clear opening. With respondents expressing regret over not voting, particularly regarding child aid program cuts and escalating living costs, Ancona urged the party to leverage this data to build an opposition narrative.

“The table has been set,” Fernandez Ancona said. “The question is, will we be able to take advantage of it? Will we really lean in? Will we not shy away from actually going on offense about this bill? It’s all about, can we seize the opportunity?”

Natasha Sarin and Yale Budget Lab Analyze Important Budget Bill

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) is projected to significantly increase the U.S. federal deficit by more than $4 trillion over the next decade, while disproportionately affecting lower-income households by reducing their after-tax income.

The Yale Budget Lab estimates that the federal deficit will grow by over $4 trillion in the coming decade as a result of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), according to Natasha Sarin, co-founder and president of The Budget Lab at Yale. Speaking at the American Community Media briefing, Sarin discussed the long-term economic impacts of this legislation on the national deficit and the broader economy.

The fiscal implications of the OBBBA are significant. Sarin, a professor at Yale Law School and the Yale School of Management, remarked that the bill functions as “Robinhood in reverse.” She explained that the federal deficit is expected to increase, leading to a debt-to-GDP ratio rising from its current level close to 100% to about 135% by the end of the decade. This would mean that the nation’s debts will substantially surpass its economic output.

Sarin noted that higher deficits will escalate the government’s borrowing costs, which will, in turn, affect households and businesses by increasing mortgage rates and the cost of various loans. This could result in higher expenses for car loans, student loans, and small business loans, contributing to a decreasing economic output over time.

Analyzing the winners and losers from the OBBBA, Sarin, along with her colleague Richard Prisinzano, Director of Policy Analysis at the Yale Budget Lab, questioned the distribution of trillions of dollars set to be spent under this legislation. Their findings indicate that households in the lowest 10% income bracket could lose approximately $700 annually in after-tax and transfer income over the decade spanning 2026 to 2034.

For the country’s wealthiest, the scenario is quite the opposite. The top 1% of earners could see an increase of about $30,000 per year in after-tax income. Those in the top 0.1% income bracket, earning more than $5.18 million, as per estimates from CBS MoneyWatch, could benefit by as much as $286,440 annually.

Sarin underscored that the bottom 40% of income earners would be worse off post-OBBBA, bearing the burden of cuts in programs like Medicaid and SNAP, which outweigh the benefits from any tax changes included in the bill.

The OBBBA entails significant changes in tariff policies, with effective tariff rates rising to about 18.7%, compared to approximately 2% at the beginning of the current administration. Sarin pointed out that lower-income households, which spend a larger portion of their income on essential goods, including food, energy, housing, and transportation, are particularly susceptible to the effects of higher tariffs.

The OBBBA incorporates a historic $900 billion cut to Medicaid, marking the largest reduction in the program’s history. Though framed primarily as a tax cut bill, the legislation represents the most profound change to the healthcare system since the Affordable Care Act (ACA), said Larry Levitt, Executive Vice President for Health Policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Levitt stated that the Congressional Budget Office estimates this legislation will decrease federal health spending by more than a trillion dollars over the next decade and potentially increase the uninsured population by 11.8 million. These figures might decrease slightly due to last-minute bill changes. However, the magnitude of these healthcare system changes is considerable, with 4.8 million individuals expected to lose coverage primarily due to bureaucratic complexities and increased Medicaid renewal requirements.

The healthcare marketplace will also undergo significant transformation. New income verification procedures will complicate the process of obtaining coverage, and the discontinuation of automatic coverage renewal may result in many losing their insurance. Furthermore, many low-income, lawfully present immigrants will become ineligible for premium assistance under the ACA, as well as Medicaid and Medicare.

Levitt highlighted potential administrative efforts to penalize states like California for using state funds to provide healthcare to undocumented immigrants. Congress has waived notable amounts of Medicare and Medicaid funding, totaling about half a trillion dollars, but there is no certainty that such waivers will continue in the future.

The enhanced premium tax credits available under the ACA are set to expire at the year’s end. If not extended, these developments could cause out-of-pocket premiums for more than 20 million enrollees to surge by an average of more than 75%, potentially leaving millions uninsured by the beginning of 2026. Notably, many of the significant changes introduced by the OBBBA will unfold gradually, with notable effects emerging after the upcoming midterm elections and beyond.

Passport Renewal Eases for Some in America

Renewing a passport in the United States has been revolutionized by a new online system, making the process faster, simpler, and completely digital for many citizens.

For years, American citizens faced a complicated and time-consuming process when their passports expired. It involved extensive paperwork, frustrating visits to the post office, and long wait times. However, a recent transformation spearheaded by the U.S. State Department has ushered in a new era of digital convenience.

The Online Passport Renewal (OPR) program has fundamentally changed how U.S. citizens renew their passports. With no more paperwork, government office visits, or physical queues, citizens can now complete the entire renewal process from the comfort of their homes. By simply taking a digital photo, uploading it through a secure portal, and submitting an online payment, applicants often receive their new passports in under two weeks—an efficiency once unimaginable in the realm of government services.

Since its inception, the OPR program has become a quiet but significant revolution within the U.S. State Department, now managing nearly half of all passport renewals. To date, over three million Americans have utilized this system, with an impressive 94% satisfaction rate, a testament to its reliability and user-friendliness.

The success of the OPR system is even more remarkable considering the severe challenges the passport bureaucracy encountered just two years earlier. By 2023, a post-pandemic surge in international travel, combined with staffing challenges and outdated systems, resulted in an overwhelming demand for passport processing. With over 25 million passports being handled annually—an increase from previous decades—offices were swamped, with backlogs becoming the norm.

During those times, employees were even instructed to move storage bins closer to their workstations to save seconds in processing times, underscoring the desperation of the situation. In the words of former Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, Rena Bitter, “Our only tool was elbow grease.”

The idea of online renewal had been discussed for years, but previous attempts, including a botched 2022 pilot, yielded little success. Adjudicators accustomed to processing hundreds of paper applications daily could only manage a few with the new system, leading to a process ironically overflowing with inefficiencies, such as printing digital forms to rescan them later.

Despite initial setbacks, a determined team led by Chief Information Officer Luis Coronado and veteran passport official Matt Pierce refused to abandon the project. In 2024, they decided to reboot the initiative with a new approach. Instead of a broad launch, they introduced a controlled beta version, rolling it out incrementally and addressing user feedback at each stage.

With careful planning and attention to user needs, bugs—like those causing photo upload errors—were systematically rectified. By September 2024, the improved Online Passport Renewal system was launched to the entire eligible American citizenry.

Responses to the new system were swift and overwhelmingly positive. Users reported completing the renewal process in as little as 15 minutes, considerably faster than routine tasks like ordering dinner online. Some even received their passports within just 10 days, far surpassing expectations.

Matt Pierce himself illustrated the program’s dedication to public service by assisting an elderly applicant over the phone while boarding a cruise. Such personalized service has become emblematic of the OPR initiative. As stated by Rena Bitter, “You will not meet a group of people more committed to public service.”

According to Times of India, the meticulous approach and dedication of the team have turned the OPR program into a model of digital transformation within government services.

Source: Original article

Trump Sues WSJ for Libel Over Epstein Birthday Letters Report

President Donald Trump has initiated a $20 billion libel lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal over reports he allegedly gifted Jeffrey Epstein a note bearing his name and an image of a naked woman.

President Donald Trump has launched legal action against the Wall Street Journal and its reporters, seeking at least $20 billion in damages. The lawsuit, filed in a Miami federal court, accuses the publication of failing to adhere to journalistic standards in a story about a collection of letters allegedly gifted to Jeffrey Epstein, which included a note purportedly from Trump featuring an outline of a naked woman. Trump firmly denies authorship of the letter.

The 18-page lawsuit describes the Wall Street Journal’s alleged lapses, highlighting that the publication did not produce the drawing or the letter in their report, claiming their absence because “no authentic letter or drawing exists,” according to Trump’s attorney.

Trump expressed his intention to initiate legal proceedings promptly after the Journal’s article surfaced on Thursday, naming reporters Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo as defendants. Trump also singled out Rupert Murdoch, owner of News Corp, during a Truth Social post, suggesting Murdoch had assured Trump he would manage the situation.

In response, Dow Jones, the Journal’s parent company, released a statement expressing confidence in the report’s accuracy and pledging to defend against the lawsuit vigorously.

Scrutiny has intensified lately concerning Trump’s past association with Epstein, the deceased convicted sex offender who died in a Manhattan jail in 2019 awaiting trial for federal sex trafficking charges. Amid his 2024 campaign, Trump spoke about potentially releasing more files on Epstein, responding to right-wing voices demanding further transparency around Epstein’s controversial case.

A Justice Department memo published earlier this month dismissed the existence of any “client list” maintained by Epstein implicating influential men in illegal activities. However, the absence of such a list has disappointed many of Trump’s supporters, creating a rift within his MAGA base.

The president’s relationship with media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who also owns Fox News, has been characterized by fluctuating dynamics over the years. Trump has repeatedly been a focal point in Murdoch’s media outlets, including Fox News, which prominently features Trump’s daughter-in-law, Lara Trump.

Facing ongoing legal battles with media entities, Trump seems undeterred, continuing to challenge stories he deems defamatory. Legal scholars note his presidency is one of the rare administrations seeing direct lawsuits from the president against media organizations.

First Amendment attorney Ted Boutrous mentioned that it is notably uncommon for a sitting president to sue a reporter or publication for defamation, emphasizing that the presidential “bully pulpit” often suffices in addressing grievances over alleged misrepresentations.

In 2024, Trump initiated legal actions against multiple media outlets during his reelection campaign. A notable instance involved ABC and claims from George Stephanopoulos regarding a jury’s findings in E. Jean Carroll’s case. ABC’s parent company, Disney, settled with Trump, setting a precedent for future settlements linked to Trump’s presidential library funding.

Trump recently withdrew a lawsuit against CBS News related to a “60 Minutes” segment, with Paramount agreeing to a payment as part of the settlement. Further settlements with Meta and X highlight Trump’s sustained focus on countering adversarial coverage.

Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond law professor, points to Trump’s approach as a tactical maneuver designed to instill caution among media outlets in their coverage of Trump and government matters, citing ongoing litigation as efforts that challenge First Amendment freedoms.

Following the lawsuit’s filing, Trump noted on Truth Social his anticipation of Murdoch and his associates undergoing extensive depositions and testimonies as part of the proceedings.

Source: Original article

Billionaires Pledge $1 Billion for AI-Driven Economic Mobility

Five of America’s leading philanthropists have pledged more than $1 billion to a new initiative aimed at improving economic mobility for low-income Americans, with the support of artificial intelligence company Anthropic.

In the United States, the dream of climbing the economic ladder is becoming increasingly elusive. In response, five influential billionaires—Bill Gates, Charles Koch, Steve Ballmer, Scott Cook, and John Overdeck—are joining forces in a bid to reverse this trend and reinvigorate the notion of equal opportunity. These philanthropists have collectively committed over $1 billion to establish NextLadder Ventures, a philanthropic venture focused on enhancing economic mobility. This new initiative also involves a partnership with artificial intelligence giant Anthropic to leverage technology for this cause.

Charles Koch, known for his book “Believe in People: Bottom-Up Solutions For A Top-Down World,” writes about the societal challenges contributing to a declining sense of upward mobility. He cites rising suicide rates and drug overdoses as indicative of a society moving towards a stark divide between those who progress and those who fall behind. Through NextLadder Ventures, Koch and his fellow billionaires aim to steer change toward a more equitable environment.

Ryan Rippel, CEO of NextLadder Ventures, brings valuable insight and experience from his tenure at the Gates Foundation, focusing on economic mobility. He explains that the coalition of these billionaires is driven by a shared question: how to effect meaningful change for individuals facing significant economic barriers daily.

Rippel, who faced his own financial challenges growing up in Missouri after losing both parents, sees this mission as vital. Currently, more than one in ten Americans live below the poverty line, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. On top of that, data from the Urban Institute indicates that over half of U.S. citizens are unable to save beyond their monthly expenses. Rippel believes advancing AI and similar technologies could play a significant role in addressing these economic challenges.

Kevin Bromer, executive director of the Ballmer Group, reflects on the collective effort: “We had a common recognition that we’re at an inflection point in the social impact and technology spaces and viewed this as the perfect time to come together and have an opportunity to go further as a group than we could individually.”

The $1 billion from NextLadder Ventures will be allocated over the next seven years across nonprofit and for-profit ventures. This funding will be dispersed via grants, equity investments, and revenue-based financing methods. Proceeds from such investments will be reinvested to maintain their philanthropic mission.

Though no funding commitments have been formalized yet, entities like CarePortal and Rasa-Legal are examples of initiatives aligned with NextLadder’s mission. CarePortal connects children and families in need with community resources, while Rasa-Legal assists clients in expunging criminal records at a fraction of the usual cost.

Anthropic’s contribution to the initiative includes providing free AI processing power and technical support to NextLadder Ventures’ beneficiaries, facilitating innovative solutions to reach the market more swiftly.

Over the coming 15 years, NextLadder Ventures plans to incorporate more philanthropic partners and secure additional funding. The goal is to foster a robust market of scalable technologies capable of aiding low-income individuals, social workers, legal aid providers, and others in overcoming economic hurdles such as job loss and housing instability.

Beyond NextLadder Ventures, these billionaire philanthropists intend to continue their support for economic mobility through their respective foundations. Gates, Ballmer, and Koch are notable figures on Forbes’ list of top American philanthropists, each having made significant contributions to various social causes. Gates, for instance, has distributed nearly $47.7 billion through the Gates Foundation, primarily targeting health and poverty alleviation.

Meanwhile, Steve Ballmer, alongside his wife Connie, has focused on education and economic mobility, including pledges to Communities In Schools and StriveTogether. Charles Koch has contributed approximately $1.9 billion, mainly through the Stand Together network, focusing on education and criminal justice reform. Though not in the top 25 philanthropists, Scott Cook and John Overdeck have each donated nearly $500 million through their foundations.

Brian Hooks, CEO of Koch’s Stand Together, highlights the uniqueness of this collaborative effort, stating, “I don’t think there’s ever been a collaboration among philanthropies quite like this. The potential for all of us to do much more than we could in another situation is just enormous.”

Source: Original article

India’s Cooling Inflation Spurs Rate Cut Calls, Demand Concerns

A significant drop in India’s retail inflation to record lows is fueling calls for interest rate cuts, highlighting concerns over weakening demand.

India has witnessed a substantial decrease in retail inflation, reaching a six-year low, prompting discussions about potential interest rate cuts within the year. Analysts suggest that this decline underscores a weakening demand in the economy, necessitating further financial stimulus.

The drop in June’s headline inflation is paired with low core inflation, which remains below 4% when excluding gold, silver, and fuel prices. This indicates softer underlying consumption, which analysts believe could require additional support from monetary policy.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) executed a greater-than-expected interest rate cut of 50 basis points in June, changing its stance to ‘neutral,’ which signaled limited scope for additional cuts. However, the unexpected inflation figures from Monday have led to increased speculation about further easing. Swap rates have declined, reflecting market bets on at least one more rate cut.

Economist Radhika Rao from DBS Bank anticipates another 50 basis point cut in the current easing cycle. She said the softer-than-expected data, such as production, credit growth, and auto sales, alongside inflation figures below projections for the first half of fiscal 2026, will likely motivate the RBI’s monetary policy committee to further reduce rates, without specifying a timeframe.

The next RBI policy review is in early August, but analysts predict the bank will wait for more data and clarity regarding global trade tensions before acting, potentially in September or October.

Signs of weak demand are emerging in sectors like automotive and real estate. Car sales to dealers in June hit an 18-month low, and home sales in India’s top seven cities fell by 20% during the April-June quarter, according to a report from real estate consultancy Anarock.

Gaura Sen Gupta, chief economist at IDFC First Bank, expects the central bank to cut rates once more in either October or December, citing high-frequency indicators that continue to show moderation in urban consumption and private capital expenditures.

India’s central bank projects inflation for the year to remain below 3.7%, as Governor Sanjay Malhotra told CNBC TV-18. He emphasized that the monetary policy committee will consider both the current and future inflation outlook when deciding on further rate adjustments.

In an earlier interview following the June policy decision, Governor Malhotra noted that lower-than-expected inflation could provide additional room for policy maneuvering. Economist Samiran Chakraborty from Citi mentioned that despite the RBI’s ‘neutral’ stance, the softer Consumer Price Index (CPI) figures present an opportunity for some monetary easing.

The average inflation rate in the April-June quarter was 2.7%, below the RBI’s forecast of 2.9%. Citi projects July’s inflation could hit a record low of 1.1% and estimates an annual average of 3.2% for the financial year 2025-26, the lowest since 1990.

The deceleration in urban consumption in India, attributed to weak wage growth and depleted household savings, began last year. Despite a rural demand recovery following a strong monsoon, progress has been inconsistent.

Sales of two-wheel vehicles, a rural demand proxy, increased by merely 4.7% in June but dropped 12.5% month-on-month. Private investment also remains sluggish, with capacity utilization stuck at around 75–76% for over a year—below the threshold typically needed to spur new capital expenditures.

Madhavi Arora, an economist at Emkay Global, suggested that investment is unlikely to see immediate growth due to global trade uncertainties and a skeptical domestic demand outlook. She pointed out that India’s growth seems stagnant at a range of 6.0%–6.5%, largely due to absent private sector participation.

Although government capital expenditures rose in the first quarter of fiscal 2026, the previously announced tax cuts in the budget limit further fiscal stimulus options. According to IDFC’s Sen Gupta, with constraints on fiscal policy to stimulate growth, monetary policy will need to play a critical role.

Source: Original article

Warren Buffett: Success in Life Hinges on Love

Warren Buffett, renowned investor, defines true success not through financial achievements but by the love and respect one earns from those around them.

Warren Buffett, one of the most celebrated investors of our time, offers a poignant perspective on success that goes beyond financial gain. His insights are not only rooted in investment acumen but also in understanding what truly matters in life—human connections and the love we cultivate from others.

A few years back, speaking to students at Georgia Tech, Buffett articulated his personal definition of success with disarming honesty. He emphasized, “If you get to my age in life and nobody thinks well of you, I don’t care how big your bank account is, your life is a disaster.” This insightful comment underscores Buffett’s belief that true success is measured not by wealth, but by the depth of relationships and the love one inspires.

Buffett elaborates on this in his biography, The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life. He stated, “You’ll really measure your success in life by how many of the people you want to have love you actually do love you.” He further noted that despite financial accomplishments, a truly successful life is defined by genuine connections, which can only be cultivated by being lovable and giving love generously.

This sentiment challenges the conventional narrative of success, which often prioritizes ambition, competition, and personal advancement. While striving for wealth and recognition frequently isolates individuals, Buffett’s approach underscores the importance of trust, respect, and loyalty as core elements of meaningful success.

For leaders today, Buffett’s wisdom offers valuable guidance. Effective leaders do not focus excessively on self-promotion or singular achievement. Instead, they prioritize empowering others, cultivating communities, and nurturing relationships. This approach to leadership ultimately reflects in the legacy one leaves—how well one has cared for others rather than one’s own achievements.

In today’s climate of division and workplace dynamics shaped by remote work, diminishing employee loyalty, and widespread burnout, Buffett’s message becomes ever more relevant. It suggests that true leadership and legacy are not about your accomplishments in building companies or teams. Instead, it focuses on the impact you have on others and how you’ve treated them throughout your journey.

Buffett’s philosophy can be practically applied in several ways:

Lead Selflessly: Prioritize giving over receiving. Effective leaders selflessly support and develop others without expecting an immediate return. Research indicates that servant leaders cultivate teams that are more committed and productive because people tend to value leaders who make them feel appreciated and secure.

Strategic Love in Business: While affection and business may seem mismatched, Buffett illustrates the advantages of enjoying one’s work environment. Companies that cultivate a values-driven, supportive culture experience better overall performance. Investing in such cultures results in greater trust, collaboration, and employee satisfaction.

Adopt the Platinum Rule: While the Golden Rule encourages treating others as you wish to be treated, the Platinum Rule advocates for treating others as they want to be treated. This approach requires empathy and emotional intelligence, enabling leaders to adapt their methods based on understanding the needs of others.

Find and Share Your Passion: Align your work with what energizes you and support others in doing the same. Successful leaders encourage people to engage in work that is meaningful to them. The enthusiasm one brings to their work can be infectious, motivating and inspiring those around them.

In conclusion, Warren Buffett’s reflections on love as a metric of success challenge traditional ideals. His philosophy questions the singular pursuit of wealth and highlights the importance of nurturing meaningful relationships. The essence of success lies not in material gain but in the enduring impact of love and kindness shared with others.

Source: Original article

Dr. Abdulla Manjeri: From Kerala to Saudi Arabia: A Journey of Several Milestones

Dr. Abdulla Manjeri, a distinguished professional with a rich career spanning various leadership roles, wears many a hat. Dr. Manjeri is an accomplished academician, educator, entrepreneur, business leader, and community leader.

f25b83c5 8c77 4fc0 9a93 cf03a50ab217

Born and raised in Kerala, India, Dr. Manjeri has lived, studied, and worked in several countries, gaining experience and exposure to diverse cultures and peoples around the globe. He holds a Doctoral Degree in Business Administration and had his higher studies completed at the prestigious Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) in New Delhi, India.

Dr. Manjeri currently serves as the CEO & Managing Director of the British Scholar Olympiad (BSO), UK. Additionally, he coordinates the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) and AMITY University in Saudi Arabia and is the Managing Trustee of the Tangible Liberators Smarme Anodyne Trust (TALSAT).Previously, Dr. Manjeri had served as the Associate Director (Middle East) at the International Institute for Science and Academic Collaboration (IISAC), USA.

A successful entrepreneur, owning and managing several businesses, Dr. Manjeri is the CMD of German Gulf Aviation Services India, with its registered office in Delhi. He is the Director & Partner of Ameri Air Aviation, based in United Arab Emirates, and is the President of MANJERSON Softech (P) Ltd.

f74a9df4 c71c 440f 83a6 91ad0cd463d6

Dr. Manjeri owned PAN Arab Co. in Doha, Qatar, and co-owned Allied Hospitality Services in Doha, Qatar. Currently, he runs KURIKKAL TRADERS LTD in India, a company specializing in building materials and innovative technology. In addition, he owns ISHA Designs in Bahrain.

His professional affiliations include serving as President and Chairman of the Indian Cultural Welfare Society (ICWS) and as the Global Vice Chairman and Global Good Will Ambassador of the World Malayalee Council. Currently, he serves as the managing Director of Global Malayalee festival, panned to be held in Kochi, India on Jan. 1-2, 2026.

When asked about his motivating factors in life that have enabled him to be a successful business leader and community leader, Dr. Manjeri is says, “They are driven by a desire for meaningful relationships, helping the downtrodden and desire for purpose, personal growth and community service making an enduring and perpetual impact in the life.”

84b2eaa0 98fe 4674 871b a1133b2faf90

Success comes to those with determination and dedication. Dr. Manjeri had to face many challenges in his endeavors to realize his mission in life. “As life is challenging for those who keep values, I had to overcome many challenges to reach where I am today,” he recalls.

Dr. Manjeri gives credit to his father, whom he describes as his mentor, who had instilled in him several qualities that help him to be a good human being and a successful business leader. “My dad was my mentor. He constantly guided me through my life. He always wanted me to be a shining crystal in the solution of life.”

Abdullla family

Dr. Manjeri’s dedication to community services is highlighted by his involvement in the Managing Committee of IISD. He was the chairman of the Board of Directors of International Indian School Dammam for two terms, and he was recognized for his contributions to literacy campaigns in Kerala.His commitment to professional service is evident through his roles as a symposium co-organizer and chief organizer of seminars on renewable energy.

Dr. Manjeri has shown profound passion for education. He has been actively involved in teaching and mentoring students. In the early years of his career, he worked as a lecturer at MTI Education Complex in Vallancheri, Kerala, where he eventually became the Administrative Principal of the institution. He has delivered guest lectures and conducted workshops at various institutions, sharing his expertise in business administration, entrepreneurship, and leadership.

A major highlight and accomplished aspect that Dr. Manjeri cherishes in life is that he had served the chairman of International Indian School Dammam, one of the largest schools in Asia. “While I was the chairman of IISD, the school had enrolled 19,500 students under one roof. I got elected to the Board of Management for three terms and had served as the Chairman of the Board twice,” Dr. Majeri proudly states.

His teaching philosophy emphasizes practical knowledge and real-world applications, preparing students to excel in their careers. Through his roles at IGNOU and AMITY University in Saudi Arabia, he has contributed significantly to the academic development of students, fostering a culture of learning and innovation.

Recognition and awards came his way, as he became a role model to his fellow citizens and communities around the world. Dr. Manjeri has been honored with several awards including the Youth Expat Award in 2005 by GARSHOM, recognizing his contributions to conserving culture and heritage.

Dr. Manjeri is married to Shamla, and the couple are blessed with four children, three boys  and a girl. His older son Aijas, working at a Multi-national Company, is married to Amina. His two younger sons are doing businesses and are licensed at the Ministry of Investment in Saudi Arabia. His youngest child is Alisha, who is born and raised in Saudi Arabia and is in High School.

While feeling elated and proud of his achievements, accomplishments, and contributionsto humanity, Dr. Manjeri says, “Being a good human being has been the mission and goal in my life.”

Fed Reports Businesses Passing Tariff Costs to Consumers

Businesses are transferring increased input costs due to tariffs onto consumers, resulting in higher prices, according to the Federal Reserve’s latest report.

The Federal Reserve’s recently released “Beige Book,” an anecdotal survey of domestic economic conditions, has highlighted a widespread trend wherein businesses across various sectors are raising prices to counter the additional costs imposed by tariffs. This trend was reported across all 12 of the Fed’s regional districts, reflecting a national impact.

“Many firms passed on at least a portion of cost increases to consumers through price hikes or surcharges,” noted the Beige Book. Companies that opted not to pass these costs on to consumers encountered narrowed profit margins, as consumer price sensitivity continues to grow.

The Labor Department reported an increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in June, partially attributed to these tariffs, with the annual rise reaching 2.7% up from 2.4% in May and 2.3% in April. This increase aligns with economists’ predictions, who anticipated that the inflationary pressures from tariffs would become visible as summer progressed and as prior inventories cleared.

Fitch Ratings has cited the aggregate U.S. tariff rate at 14.1%, marking the highest rate in decades. This figure encompasses President Trump’s 10% general tariff, along with specific tariffs targeting China and certain individual goods. However, the country-specific “reciprocal” tariffs are currently on hold amid ongoing trade negotiations, and will remain paused until August 1.

Import prices recorded a modest increase of 0.1% in June, according to the Labor Department, yet they are down 0.2% compared to the previous year due to lower energy prices. This outcome fell short of economists’ expectations. Fuel import prices decreased by 0.7% in June, following a significant 5% drop in May, as tensions in the Middle East influenced global energy markets. West Texas Intermediate crude oil witnessed a decline of over 10% this month.

Excluding fuel and food imports, core import prices saw a moderate rise of 0.2% in June, following a smaller 0.1% increase in May.

Adding to the economic dynamics, the U.S. dollar has depreciated by approximately 9% since the start of the year, a trend exacerbated by the ongoing trade war initiated by President Trump. Economists suggest that this decline in the dollar’s value could further exacerbate inflation.

Michael Pearce, deputy chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, commented to Reuters, “Since the Trump administration began imposing tariffs, the dollar has depreciated, which could lead to a larger pass-through from tariffs to consumer prices.” He underscored the potential for a weaker dollar to amplify the likelihood of firms transferring a more significant share of tariff costs to consumers.

Russia Warns US of World War Three Risks

Russia has issued a stark warning to the Western world, cautioning that a potential World War Three would not be limited to European borders, following Ukraine’s attack on Russia’s Kursk region.

In the wake of a Ukrainian attack on the western Kursk region of Russia, which has resulted in significant territorial gains for Ukraine, Russian officials have escalated their rhetoric toward the West. The assault, described as the largest foreign incursion on Russian soil since World War Two, prompted a response from Russian President Vladimir Putin who warned of a “worthy” retaliatory action.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, speaking from Moscow, accused the West of attempting to exacerbate the situation in Ukraine. He cautioned against the potential approval of Ukraine’s request to strike deeper into Russian territory with Western-supplied missiles. Lavrov emphasized the dangers posed by such actions, likening them to “playing with fire” and underscoring the risk of nuclear conflict.

“Americans unequivocally associate conversations about a Third World War as something that, God forbid, if it happens, will affect Europe exclusively,” Lavrov stated, indicating the wider implications of the conflict.

Russia also reiterated its military doctrine concerning the use of nuclear weapons, established in 2020, which reserves the use of such weapons as a retaliatory measure to attacks involving nuclear arms or other weapons of mass destruction that threaten the state’s very existence.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dismissed Kremlin threats of retaliation as bluffs, asserting that the attack on Kursk was a demonstration of their resolve. He highlighted existing restrictions by allies as limitations to Ukraine’s ability to target Russian military positions effectively. Zelenskiy called upon Ukraine’s allies to take bolder steps in supporting Kyiv’s military efforts.

The Kremlin accused Western countries, particularly the United States and Britain, of supplying tactical support and weaponry to Ukraine. This includes British tanks and U.S. rocket systems, which Kyiv has confirmed were part of their operations in Kursk. The U.S.-supplied HIMARS missiles were specifically used to sabotage bridges in the region.

The United States maintains that it was unaware of Ukraine’s plans for the operation in Kursk, emphasizing that it played no active role in the campaign. Nevertheless, The New York Times reported that intelligence provided by the United States and Britain, including satellite imagery, was shared with Ukraine post-attack to aid in tracking Russian troop movements.

Despite Western assertions to the contrary, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov labeled the involvement of the United States as an “obvious fact.” Meanwhile, Sergei Naryshkin, head of Russian foreign intelligence, also questioned Western denials of involvement in the Kursk attack.

As tensions remain high, the international community watches closely, aware that any further escalation could have far-reaching consequences beyond the European continent.

Trump Presidency News on July 17, 2025

House Republican leaders are working to expedite the passage of President Donald Trump’s proposed $9 billion federal funding cuts amid negotiations with party members pushing for a vote on a Jeffrey Epstein-related measure.

In efforts to secure enough support, House Republican leaders are gearing up for an extended session as they seek to advance a $9 billion package of federal funding cuts championed by President Donald Trump. The legislative push follows a day marked by intense discussions with GOP members who are advocating for a vote on a measure related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Simultaneously, a report from the Wall Street Journal has surfaced concerning a controversial letter allegedly linked to President Trump. The report highlighted a collection of letters given to Epstein on his 50th birthday in 2003, among which was a note purportedly bearing Trump’s name alongside an outline of a naked woman. In response, President Trump has denied authoring the letter and expressed intentions to file a lawsuit against the publication.

Adding to the developments surrounding the president, the White House has provided an update on Trump’s health. Recently, medical examinations were conducted on him due to swelling observed in his legs. According to his doctor, the diagnosis is chronic venous insufficiency, a condition prevalent among older individuals. The examination ruled out severe complications such as heart failure, arterial disease, or other significant illnesses.

The health update aims to allay concerns regarding the president’s well-being, as the administration simultaneously manages its legislative aims and addresses emerging issues tied to Trump’s long-standing affiliations and public controversies.

This article information is attributed to the Wall Street Journal, as well as the latest communications from the White House.

Musk’s $20 Trillion Plan Could Merge Two Continents

Elon Musk’s ambitious plan to construct a $20 trillion transatlantic tunnel aims to connect New York and London, cutting travel time to under an hour with high-speed magnetic trains.

Elon Musk, known for reshaping the transportation and infrastructure landscape through ventures like Tesla and SpaceX, is now turning his attention toward an audacious project: a $20 trillion plan to build a tunnel under the Atlantic Ocean. The goal is to link New York and London via magnetic trains traveling in low-pressure tubes, potentially reducing the trip to under an hour. This new project would be an extension of his work with The Boring Company, which has previously focused on shorter urban transit solutions.

The Boring Company claims that the transatlantic tunnel could be constructed at a fraction of the cost of traditional methods—up to 1,000 times cheaper. The trains within this tunnel would reportedly reach speeds close to 4,800 kilometers per hour. The concept isn’t entirely new to Musk, as he first introduced a high-speed transit system in 2013 with the Hyperloop, aimed at connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles. However, the Hyperloop has remained largely experimental, hindered by cost and technical challenges, even as test tracks have been developed in countries like India and China.

Historically, the idea of a transatlantic tunnel has fascinated engineers and futurists for more than a century, first proposed in the early 1900s. Yet, past attempts have never materialized due to the astronomical costs and the significant engineering hurdles involved. A tunnel stretching over 3,000 miles under the Atlantic would either need to traverse beneath the seabed or hang suspended underwater. For perspective, the Channel Tunnel between France and the U.K. is only 23 miles long yet took six years to complete. A project on the scale of an Atlantic tunnel could potentially take centuries to build.

Despite the excitement surrounding the proposal, there is currently no detailed plan, budget, or timeline for the monumental project. Although technology continues to advance, the notion of zipping under the Atlantic Ocean remains largely theoretical. Should the tunnel eventually come into existence, it could more than just reduce travel times. It has the potential to overhaul global trade routes, reshape economic ties, and redefine how nations interact. From an engineering standpoint, it represents a tremendous leap—pushing the boundaries of what’s feasible for oceanic infrastructure construction. However, the immense technical, financial, and political hurdles make the idea a distant prospect for now.

The formidable oceanic pressures beneath the Atlantic present a considerable challenge for any proposed tunnel design. Critics argue that the presented cost estimates challenge accepted engineering and logistical practicalities. The deep-sea pressures, combined with the extensive scale of excavation required and the various geopolitical obstacles, compound the hurdles to be overcome. Nevertheless, discussions regarding the transatlantic tunnel are no longer limited to speculative discussions or far-off future fantasies. As global transportation seeks its next significant evolution and with Musk’s history of turning the improbable into reality, enthusiasm for the project is beginning to gain momentum in influential circles.

According to EcoPortal, this ambitious vision reflects a broader interest in overhauling transportation infrastructure to meet future needs. The ongoing development of high-speed, long-distance travel technologies suggests this is a pivotal area of focus that may one day revolutionize global connections.

Source: Original article

Trust in US Dollar’s Global Supremacy Diminishing

Global de-dollarization is not a threat to stability but rather a rebalancing of global monetary dynamics as countries reject an economic system historically tilted in Washington’s favor.

For over eighty years, the U.S. dollar has held the position of the world’s leading reserve currency, established at the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference and reinforced by the United States’ postwar industrial prowess and military influence.

Today, this dominance is increasingly being challenged from various fronts worldwide—from African revolutionary initiatives to economic recalibrations within Europe, and from the collective counteractions of BRICS nations to the geopolitical complexities involving Ukraine and Israel.

The erosion of global trust in Washington’s leadership of the international financial order has hastened a long-anticipated shift toward a multi-polar monetary structure.

The BRICS economic alliance, consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, and recently expanded to include Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Argentina, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates, is spearheading this de-dollarization trend. Now surpassing the G7 in purchasing power parity (PPP), BRICS is increasingly pushing for a reformed global financial system.

Nations within this bloc have begun trading in their own currencies, reducing reliance on the U.S. dollar. For example, India and Russia conduct oil transactions in rupees and rubles, while China and Brazil have developed processes for settling trade in yuan and Brazilian reals. Russia’s exclusion from the SWIFT financial system following its invasion of Ukraine has expedited this transition.

Economist Jeffrey Sachs has criticized the United States for using the dollar as a geopolitical tool through financial sanctions and trade restrictions. In response, countries in the global south are vigorously pursuing economic autonomy.

A quiet yet significant movement is unfolding in Africa, especially across the Sahel region. Influential leaders, such as Ibrahim Traoré of Burkina Faso, have declared intentions to abandon the CFA franc, a currency historically linked to French control and the euro. Traoré has emerged as a prominent voice in the call for economic self-governance, proposing the establishment of a pan-African currency to serve as a symbol of decolonization.

The proposed unified African currency, supported by countries like Mali, Niger, and Guinea, represents more than monetary policy; it signals a decades-long economic revolution. The West African bloc ECOWAS is actively discussing the long-overdue “Eco” currency as a challenge to U.S. and European monetary dominance.

African intellectuals and economists, including Kenyan professor PLO Lumumba, argue that political independence must coincide with economic sovereignty. This transformation is as much about identity and dignity as it is about financial transactions.

Recent calls in Italy and Germany to retrieve parts of their gold reserves from the United States highlight the underlying global uncertainty. Previously, the Bundesbank demonstrated its skepticism by recalling gold during the Obama administration. The potential for a second Trump presidency and his aggressive policies have further catalyzed these precautionary measures.

As the U.S. faces mounting national debt exceeding $36 trillion and annual interest payments surpassing $1 trillion, its reliance on the dollar’s reserve status to finance deficits is increasingly questioned. Unlike other nations, the U.S.’s monetary policy allows it to print dollars freely, maintaining an economic equilibrium others do not share.

Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz has repeatedly cautioned against the continuous exploitation of this “exorbitant privilege,” which seems unsustainable. Emerging economies bear the brunt of inflationary pressures resulting from U.S. monetary practices, enduring economic volatility not of their own making.

Ongoing military expenditures in Ukraine and Israel undermine confidence in American fiscal responsibility and the dollar’s stability. These conflicts, supported through deficit financing, amplify doubts about the sustainability of U.S. financial practices.

Despite this, over 58% of global reserves remain dollar-denominated, and nearly 90% of currency exchanges involve the dollar, underscoring its entrenched global presence. However, the strength of any currency fundamentally relies on trust, which appears to be waning. A shift toward a multi-currency global economy with regional financial systems is increasingly plausible.

The critical issue is not if but when the dollar will relinquish its supremacy. As former President Donald Trump proposes steep tariffs on BRICS nations, the path forward for the U.S. depends on whether it will embrace financial modernization or hold onto privileges that the world may soon leave behind.

Initially, the dollar’s dominance was built on U.S. moral authority and industrial strength, but the contemporary landscape has evolved post-COVID and post-colonization. Nations worldwide are redefining economic sovereignty, critiquing a financial system long perceived as biased toward Washington.

In 2025, the persistent conflict involving the Palestinian people has exacerbated global discontent, further tarnishing the U.S.’s moral standing. The de-dollarization movement represents a recalibration of global economic power, not a threat. The global south is no longer petitioning for change; it is materializing it. Continued U.S. intransigence risks forfeiting both its currency leadership and international influence.

As Sachs noted, reliance on force is unsustainable for global leadership. The global community is realigning, each nation asserting its place in the evolving financial landscape.

Source: Original article

JAINA Convention 2025 Highlights Unity in Chicago

The 23rd Biennial JAINA Convention held from July 3-6, 2025, in Schaumburg, Illinois, epitomized a global gathering of the Jain community, focusing on spirituality, culture, and unity with more than 5,000 participants from around the world.

JAINA Convention 2025 Highlights Unity in Chicago 2The 23rd Biennial JAINA Convention, hosted by the Federation of Jain Associations in North America (JAINA) in collaboration with the Jain Society of Metropolitan Chicago (JSMC), took place at the Renaissance Schaumburg Convention Center and Hyatt Regency in Schaumburg, Illinois. From July 3 to July 6, 2025, the convention gathered delegates from 72 Jain Centers across the U.S. and Canada, alongside attendees from 10 other countries including India, the UK, Germany, Oman, Dubai, and Kenya. Celebrated under the theme “Unity in Diversity: A Path to Peace,” this event highlighted Jain principles such as Ahimsa (non-violence), Anekantvad (multiple viewpoints), and Aparigraha (non-possessiveness).

The convention commenced on July 3 with registration and a memorable Temple Dwar Opening Ceremony,JAINA Convention 2025 Highlights Unity in Chicago 1 featuring Ashtapad—a unique creation showcasing 24 Tirthankaras—with sacred rituals and chants embracing the essence of Jainism. This was followed by the Exhibition Inauguration Ceremony displaying art, literature, and artifacts that emphasized the rich cultural heritage of Jainism.

A grand cultural procession in the South Parking area added to the vibrancy, with decorated vehicles and traditional dances performing under the banner of an overhead airplane marking the convention’s presence. The evening’s Opening Ceremony combined spirituality and artistry, welcoming delegates with blessings from renowned Jain spiritual leaders like Pujya Acharya Dr. Lokesh Muniji. A memorable performance of the Broadway-style production Sthulibhadra & Kosha—Nritya Natika, portraying Jain stories of love and renunciation, captivated the audience.

JAINA Convention 2025 Highlights Unity in Chicago 3 (1)Day two on July 4 began with calming yoga and meditation sessions, led by Samani Dr. Pratibha Pragyaji and Samani Punya Pragyaji, fostering inner peace among attendees. The day’s events included stirring speeches by JAINA President Bindesh Shah and JSMC President Pragnesh Shah, followed by a keynote by Pujya Dr. Gyanvatsal Swamiji on spiritual resilience. A variety of sessions included “મૈત્રીવાદ નો શંખવાદ” by Dr. Tej Sahebji and “The Most Urgent Act of True Ahimsa: What We Eat” by Dr. Faraz Harsini advocating for veganism.

The afternoon’s program included discussions on parenting within Jain principles led by Seema Jain, and a WomenJAINA Convention 2025 Highlights Unity in Chicago 3 Empowerment Forum featuring Judge Neera Bahl among others. Keynote presentations and sessions explored diverse themes such as ecological crises and crisis care, enriching attendees with knowledge and inspiration. A blood drive that started on this day exemplified Jainism’s commitment to compassion, potentially impacting 276 lives.

July 5, day three, saw a session with Jessica Cox, the world’s first licensed armless pilot, whose life story inspired many. Distinguished speaker Saman Shrut Pragyaji shared insights on living with compassion. The JAINA Awards recognized outstanding contributions within the community, awarding the prestigious JAINA Ratna to past president Mahesh Wadher of California.

JAINA Convention 2025 Highlights Unity in Chicago 3 (2)Attendees gained perspectives from sessions such as Digital Karma by Pinkesh Shah, exploring AI’s ethical dimensions, alongside unity and diversity topics. The evening culminated with cultural performances and a keynote by Bollywood icon Sonu Sood emphasizing charitable actions.

On the final day, July 6, meditation set a serene start to the day, with a closing ceremony that featured musical prodigy Sparsh Shah’s inspiring keynote, galvanizing attendees to embrace purpose and compassion in their lives. Conveners and JAINA leaders expressed gratitude to the volunteers, sponsors, and committees who ensured the convention’s success, highlighting crucial support roles such as that of the food committee led by Hitesh Shah and the transportation team.

JAINA, founded in 1981, connects over 200,000 members through its educational and humanitarian initiatives. Its reach and influence are further endorsed by USAID certification and UN Special Consultative Status. The event’s success reinforced the legacy of unity and collaboration within the Jain community. For more information, visit the original source.

Source: Original article

India, China Wealth Increased Through Rice Cultivation

Rice has long been central to economic growth in both India and China, fostering social structures that allowed entrepreneurial independence and later contributing significantly to the colonial economies through its adaptable cultivation.

Professor Emerita Francesca Bray of the University of Edinburgh, specializing in social anthropology, has explored the significant role of rice in historical agricultural societies. Her research reveals how rice cultivation shaped both the economic and social landscapes of regions, particularly in pre-colonial and colonial eras.

Initially delving into the history of agriculture in China, Bray’s interest broadened to agrarian networks and social systems, with a particular focus on rice due to its unique characteristics. Unlike global commodities like wheat and corn, which are traded and consumed internationally, rice is primarily consumed locally within the countries that produce it. This local consumption has kept rice fields smaller in scale and maintained a diversity of crops and occupations, unlike the standardized industrial monocultures prevalent with other grains.

This smaller scale of rice farming allowed for a deviation from feudal agricultural models. Many rice farms were managed by small-scale farmers rather than landlords, allowing them entrepreneurial freedom. As long as these farmers met rent obligations, they had autonomy and often evolved from tenants to landowners, a testament to the economic upward mobility facilitated by rice cultivation. In southern China and Malaysia, this system encouraged the accumulation of wealth within generations, as farmers frequently contributed taxes or reinvested into their own communities without the constraints of feudal labor systems.

Historian Roy Bin Wong’s work, “China Transformed,” challenges common characterizations of rice-based economies as less advanced than their Western counterparts. Bray highlights that the rice-centered economy of southern China evolved into a global economic powerhouse over centuries, developing sophisticated financial systems essential in global capitalism, even if it did not experience an industrial revolution akin to Europe’s.

With the onset of colonialism, rice became integral to the burgeoning global industrial economy. During the 18th century, it was a staple in the slave trade between West Africa and the Americas and became a primary food source for colonial workforces across the tropics. Rice cultivation expanded significantly under European colonial powers, who established export-driven rice zones in regions like Indochina and Indonesia. This expansion often displaced local markets and made rice a key commodity in supporting the global colonial labor force.

Colonial administrators imposed policies that formalized intensive labor practices, as noted by historian Peter Boomgaard. The expansion of rice fields often involved harsh conditions and tied workers to their labor through debt and cash taxes, a situation that later provided a foundation for the Green Revolution of the 1960s and 1970s.

Gender also played a significant role in rice production, differing from region to region. In China, traditional notions dictated that men worked the fields while women engaged in textile production at home, though the commercialization of the textile industry eventually saw more male participation. Despite many women working in rice fields, their contributions were underrepresented in historical records, highlighting a gendered perception of labor roles.

Rice’s historic and ongoing socio-economic impact in regions like India and China underscores its vital role in agricultural economies and its influence on broader global economic systems, according to Francesca Bray.

Source: Original article

World’s Wealthiest Family Worth $1.4 Trillion Outpaces Musk, Bezos

The House of Saud, the ruling family of Saudi Arabia, boasts a staggering net worth of $1.4 trillion, surpassing the combined fortunes of prominent billionaires Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos.

The world often turns its gaze toward the immense wealth of individuals like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mukesh Ambani, Mark Zuckerberg, and Warren Buffett. However, a royal dynasty quietly eclipses them all in terms of combined fortune—the House of Saud, the ruling family of Saudi Arabia. Originating not from the corporate or financial hubs of Silicon Valley or Wall Street, their wealth instead hails from the heart of the Middle East, where they govern one of the most resource-rich nations on the planet.

The House of Saud’s financial empire is vast, with a net worth estimated at a staggering $1.4 trillion (£1.1 trillion). This outsized fortune towers over other notable figures, with Musk’s net worth around $396 billion (£313 billion), and Bezos at $240 billion (£190 billion). Saudi Arabia’s royal family far surpasses each, maintaining wealth on an unmatched scale.

The source of this wealth is deeply rooted in oil. As the ruling family of the world’s largest oil-exporting country, they control one of Earth’s most valuable natural resources. Central to this is Saudi Aramco, the national oil company considered among the most profitable worldwide, significantly contributing to the family’s financial dominion. Yet, their wealth doesn’t reside solely in oil. The House of Saud has wisely diversified, investing in real estate, art, technology, and private business ventures, extending its reach far beyond its oil-rich borders.

There’s little secrecy about the opulent lifestyle maintained by the Saudi royals. Their assets are breathtaking, including private jets, mega-yachts, palatial residences, priceless art collections, and an array of exotic cars. Notably, the family owns the world’s largest private jet, a customized Boeing 747-400, renowned for its lavish interior. Royals ride in style, with some vehicles in their garage, like gold-plated Lamborghini Aventadors and Rolls-Royce Phantoms, tallying a worth of over $22 million. Al Yamamah Palace, the king’s residence, is an epitome of grandeur—reportedly containing over 1,000 rooms.

An expansive family, the House of Saud includes approximately 15,000 members, yet true power remains concentrated among about 2,000 close relatives. Spearheading this dynasty is King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, who ascended the throne in 2015. The king is one of the renowned “Sudairi Seven,” sons born to the favored wife of Ibn Saud, the kingdom’s founding leader. He is succeeded by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, known as MBS since 2017. MBS stands as a pivotal and sometimes polarizing figure, credited with Vision 2030—a sweeping reform initiative aimed at modernizing Saudi Arabia and reducing its economic dependence on oil. His tenure, however, has faced criticism regarding human rights concerns, involvement in the Yemen conflict, and the suppression of dissent. Despite these contentious issues, MBS’s wealth and opulent lifestyle are extraordinary, with assets such as the $400 million superyacht Serene featuring helipads, underwater observation areas, and lavish suites.

The Al Saud dynasty has governed Saudi Arabia for over 80 years, tracing its roots as far back as the 18th century. As one of the world’s oldest and most influential monarchies, the family seamlessly blends conservative Islamic governance with immense modern wealth. Unlike other royal families that often serve a symbolic role, the House of Saud remains actively engaged in governance, wielding influence over politics, religion, economics, and global affairs. This stands in stark contrast to the British royal family, whose financial worth and global influence, notably under the leadership of the late Queen Elizabeth II and now King Charles III, remain modest in comparison to the towering trillions managed by the Saudis.

Source: Original article

Trump Confronts Crisis Amid Epstein Conspiracy Theories

President Donald Trump’s efforts to downplay the controversy surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have failed to quell the demands for transparency from his supporters.

President Donald Trump faces increased pressure from supporters demanding the release of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking investigation. His attempts to minimize the issue and call off his supporters have done little to halt the uproar, a situation of his own making after years of promoting conspiracy theories.

The Justice Department and FBI recently announced that no Epstein client list existed, leaving many of Trump’s supporters feeling disillusioned and demanding further transparency. Trump responded by defending Attorney General Pam Bondi while criticizing reporters for inquiries about the documents.

While speaking to reporters during a flight back to Washington, D.C., Trump labeled the Epstein case as “pretty boring,” stating, “I don’t understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody.” Yet, his downplay of the situation contrasts with the significant interest in these documents among his followers.

Over the weekend, Trump attempted to redirect the focus away from Epstein. He urged his supporters on his Truth Social platform to shift attention toward investigating Democrats and criminals rather than dwelling on Epstein-related documents. However, right-wing figures such as Laura Loomer and Jack Posobiec continue to push for comprehensive disclosure of the files.

This political crisis underscores a broader challenge for Trump, who, throughout his political career, has cultivated a base attentive to conspiratorial narratives. Now in power, he faces the consequences of these narratives. Matt Dallek, a political scientist at George Washington University, noted, “The faulty assumption Trump and others make is they can peddle conspiracy theories without any blowback.”

Despite the Justice Department and FBI’s assertion that no client list exists, past statements by administration officials suggested otherwise, fueling conspiracy theories. Bondi had previously alluded to the existence of such documents but later clarified she was referring to Epstein’s case file in general.

Experts like Josephine Lukito from the University of Texas at Austin, caution that more transparency won’t necessarily alter the beliefs of those entrenched in conspiracy theories, as they often dismiss contradictory evidence.

The Epstein controversy presents an acute dilemma for the Trump administration. Trump and his allies in the administration, including FBI figures like Director Kash Patel, have historically allied themselves with such narratives, gaining significant political traction through them. But as the case revolves around tangible crimes by Epstein, additional transparency may either restore or undermine trust among Trump’s core supporters.

This issue extends beyond just political consequences. It highlights administrative challenges and inter-agency discord. There have been reports of intense discussions between Bondi and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino concerning their roles in handling the Epstein files. Laura Loomer claimed that Bongino is considering resignation amid this discord, highlighting the strain within Trump’s administration.

The Epstein case could prove costly for Trump’s broader political ambitions, according to critics like Steve Bannon, who warned that mishandling the situation might erode support from the MAGA movement. Some Democrats also suggest that Trump’s reluctance to release the files may be tied to the potential implications for himself or his close associates.

As the calls for transparency continue to resonate throughout political circles, the situation exemplifies the broader stakes of governance amid political theater. Trump finds himself at a crossroads where the maintenance of his political base competes with the imperatives of government transparency and accountability.

According to AP News, this controversy serves as a reminder of the intricate dynamics between political narratives and the expectations of truth among the electorate.

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty & Dr. Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI

6 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPIFor the first time in the history of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI), during a formal ceremony Dr. Amit Chakrabarty and Dr. Hetal Gor were formally administered the oath of office as  the President & Chairperson of the Board of Trustees of AAPI, respectively at a solemn ceremony at the AAPI office in Oak Brook, IL, on July 3rd, 2025.

Dr. Suresh Reddy, a past President of AAPI and an elected Trustee of the Oak Brook Township administered the oath of Office to the incoming leaders of AAPI, who are committed to take AAPI to the next level in the coming year.

According to Dr. Satheesh Kathula, current President of AAPI, “In accordance with AAPI Bylaws, the President-Elect and Chair-Elect of the Board of Trustees officially assumed office on July 3rd. While the ceremonial Gavel Transfer will be held during the Annual Convention Gala on Saturday, July 26, 2025, the formal Presidential & BOT Chair Handover Ceremony was held on Thursday, July 3, 2025. This ceremony marks a meaningful leadership transition for our organization.”

Dr Amit Chakrabarty Oath

2 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI“We have the potential to make a significant impact on the healthcare landscape of this country,” Dr. Chakrabarty said. “My goal this year is to unify AAPI by transcending the regional divides that have hindered our progress in recent years. Indian American physicians represent tremendous talent and potential, and the key to realizing that lies in collective action and a united voice—something I am committed to fostering.”

Dr. Hetal Gor, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist, assumed charge as the Chair, Board of Trustees of AAPI. Dr Gor is the president/Founder of Bergen Indian Medical Association , President /Founder of US chapter of FOGSI (Federation of OBGYN Society of India, and had served as the past President of the American Association of OBGYN of Indian Origin. Dr Gor is the Chair of North NJ chapter of Indian American Women Entrepreneurs Association. Dr Gor is a Board of Trustees of Bergen Performing Arts Center in Englewood, NJ, where she brings Indian art and artists to showcase Indian Heritage.

Dr. Meher Medavaram, a Board Certified in Family Medicine Physician and a Fellow of Academy of American Family3 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI Physician, serving as the Medical Director of Mount Sinai Hospital, FAQH Center, and a Staff Physician Advocate at Good Samaritan  Hospital as well as a Clinical Preceptor at UIC College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine CMU School of Medicine also was administered the oath of office as the President Elect of AAPI.

The growing influence of physicians of Indian heritage is evident, as increasingly physicians of Indian origin hold critical positions in healthcare, academic, research, and administrative positions across the nation. We the physicians of Indian origin are proud of our great achievements and contributions to our motherland, India, our adopted land, the US, and in a very significant way to the transformation of Indo-US relations.

4 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPIServing 1 in every 7 patients in the US, AAPI members care for millions of patients every day, while several of them have risen to hold high-flying jobs, shaping the policies and programs, and inventions that shape the landscape of healthcare in the US and around the world.

“Since its inception in 1982, AAPI has been at the forefront, representing a conglomeration of more than 125,000 practicing physicians in the United States, seeking to be the united voice for the physicians of Indian origin. I trust and believe that the new Team under Dr. Amit Chakrabarty will continue the noble mission and strengthen our efforts to make AAPI reach greater heights,” said Dr. Satheesh Kathula.  For more details about AAPI, please visit: www.appiusa,org

5 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI

House Approves Trump’s Tax Bill, Marking Second-Term Milestone

House Republicans successfully passed President Donald Trump’s significant tax cuts and spending reduction bill, heralding it as a landmark achievement for his second term, despite fierce opposition from Democrats.

In a closely contested vote, House Republicans pushed through President Donald Trump’s tax cuts and spending reductions bill with a slim 218-214 margin. The approval came just in time for the Fourth of July deadline, signaling a high-stakes victory for Trump’s administration as they compile a core policy initiative early in his second term.

The bill, widely seen as a key GOP victory, was finalized amidst controversy and political maneuvering. Two Republican lawmakers joined all Democrats in opposing the legislation. GOP leaders, in collaboration with Trump, worked tirelessly to quell internal dissent and secure the votes necessary for passage.

Celebrating the legislative success in Iowa at the start of events commemorating the nation’s approaching 250th anniversary, Trump expressed gratitude toward Republican lawmakers, disparaging Democrats for their resistance to what he described as a beneficial measure.

House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana echoed Trump’s sentiment, encouraging Republicans to unify behind the bill. The colossal document, nearing 900 pages, encapsulates multiple Republican priorities under one legislative package, now labeled colloquially as Trump’s “one big beautiful bill.”

The enactment preserves $4.5 trillion in tax cuts from 2017 and introduces new ones, favoring provisions such as deductions for workers’ tips and overtime, and a sizeable deduction for older adults with particular income qualifications. Furthermore, it pledges $350 billion towards national security, including advancement in Trump’s deportation policies and the development of a new defensive system, dubbed the “Golden Dome.”

However, to offset substantial tax revenue losses, the bill implements substantial reductions, slashing $1.2 trillion from Medicaid and food stamp funding, with stricter work requirements imposed on beneficiaries. The Congressional Budget Office warns of a $3.3 trillion deficit increase over the next decade, with 11.8 million individuals potentially losing health coverage.

The bill starkly contrasts with Democratic priorities and faced unified Democratic opposition. Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York mounted a record-breaking speech on the House floor, challenging the ramifications of Trump’s “big ugly bill.” His extensive address underscored Democrats’ concerns over social program cutbacks, painting the legislation as detrimental to vulnerable populations.

As Jeffries highlighted the human costs, Democrats collectively denounced the measure as regressive and harmful to working-class citizens. Jeffries’ heartfelt oration warned of life-threatening consequences due to Medicaid cuts and their broader impact on public welfare. Republican counterarguments focused on preventing imminent tax increases while reaffirming beliefs in economic growth and program efficacy through regulatory revisions.

The Senate approved the bill days prior, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. As tensions simmered on the House floor, Johnson and Trump’s team marshaled extensive resources to rally wavering Republicans, balancing concerns between moderates and conservatives within the party.

After the conclusion of the vote, jubilant Republicans celebrated, with Trump loyalists attributing personal political stakes to the passage of the bill. Critics warned that bucking Trump’s agenda could result in significant electoral consequences, illustrating the fierce political entanglements intertwined with the passage of the legislation.

The bill represents a profound challenge to former Democratic administrations’ accomplishments, notably scaling back healthcare expansions from the Affordable Care Act and relaxing green energy incentives earmarked in prior congressional terms. Democrats caution against severe social repercussions, particularly for those reliant on federal assistance programs.

In summary, proponents argue the legislation fosters economic sustainability and secures Trump’s fiscal legacy, while detractors emphasize its expansive social health costs. The ongoing debate underscores entrenched partisan divides, persistent ideological battles, and the complexity of bipartisan governance.

According to Associated Press

Source: Original article

Powell: Fed Rates Unchanged This Year Due to Tariffs

The Federal Reserve would likely have lowered interest rates this year if not for significant policy changes by President Donald Trump, Chair Jerome Powell stated Tuesday.

In a central banking forum in Sintra, Portugal, Jerome Powell, Chair of the Federal Reserve, indicated that the Fed might have reduced interest rates this year had it not been for the substantial policy shifts implemented by President Donald Trump. When questioned about the possibility of rate cuts, Powell remarked, “I do think that’s right.”

So far this year, the Federal Reserve has refrained from lowering interest rates. Central bankers anticipate that Trump’s tariffs will impact the U.S. economy, prompting them to take a cautious approach, opting to monitor how these changes affect the economic landscape before making any decisions on rate adjustments.

This cautious stance, however, has drawn criticism from President Trump, who has persistently criticized Powell’s decision not to reduce rates. Trump has called Powell derogatory names such as a “numbskull” and a “moron” for maintaining higher interest rates compared to other countries.

In a handwritten note shared on his social media platform on Monday, Trump lambasted Powell, alleging that the Fed’s policies have financially harmed the United States. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that this note was delivered to the Fed on the same day.

The sentiment to cut rates is shared, albeit to a lesser extent, by others within the Fed. Two officials — Michelle Bowman, Fed Vice Chair for Supervision, and Fed Governor Christopher Waller — have opined that a rate cut could be considered as early as July. However, unlike Trump, they have refrained from advocating dramatic cuts, emphasizing that any decision should be contingent on economic conditions, specifically the severity of tariff-induced inflation.

Despite some internal support for rate adjustment, the likelihood of a rate cut in July remains slim, as indicated by futures data which estimate an 81% probability of rates holding steady at the Fed’s July 29-30 meeting, compared to a 19% chance of a quarter-point rate cut.

Powell, during his panel in Sintra, acknowledged that a majority of Fed officials foresee the necessity of reducing rates later this year, depending on inflation trends and labor market developments. He stated, “A solid majority of (Fed officials) do expect that it will become appropriate later this year to begin to reduce rates again.”

When asked about the possibility of a July rate cut, Powell refrained from giving a definitive answer, noting that he “can’t say” but would not dismiss any meeting from consideration.

European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, who was also on the Sintra panel, expressed support for Powell’s data-driven approach to policymaking and commended him for his apolitical stance. She affirmed that Powell “epitomizes the standard of a courageous central banker.”

Powell has refrained from responding to President Trump’s public barbs and reiterated his commitment to his responsibilities, stating, “I’m very focused on just doing my job.” Lagarde, when asked how she would respond to criticisms akin to those from Trump, supported Powell’s stance, suggesting, “I think we would (all) do exactly the same thing as our colleague, Jay Powell, does.”

Following Lagarde’s comment, attendees at the conference offered applause in support. Powell reiterated the Fed’s mission to maintain macroeconomic stability, emphasizing the need for a non-partisan approach, stating, “We don’t take sides. We don’t play one side against the other. We stay out of issues that are really not our bailiwick.”

Source: Original article

Justice Department Intensifies Denaturalization Drive, Raising Constitutional Concerns

The Justice Department is increasingly focusing on stripping U.S. citizenship from certain naturalized Americans. According to a memo dated June 11, DOJ leadership is instructing attorneys to prioritize denaturalization in cases involving naturalized citizens who have committed specific crimes. The directive also grants U.S. attorneys more authority in deciding when to pursue such actions. This policy shift targets individuals not born in the United States, and as of 2023, nearly 25 million immigrants had obtained U.S. citizenship through naturalization.

The new emphasis on denaturalization has already produced results. On June 13, a judge revoked the citizenship of Elliott Duke, an American military veteran originally from the United Kingdom who uses they/them pronouns. Duke had been convicted of distributing child sexual abuse material, a crime they later admitted to committing even before becoming a U.S. citizen.

Historically, denaturalization was a prominent tool during the McCarthy era in the late 1940s and early 1950s. It was further utilized during the Obama administration and expanded under President Trump’s first term. The process has typically targeted individuals who concealed past crimes or affiliations with banned organizations—such as the Nazi Party or communist groups—on their citizenship applications.

In his memo, Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate emphasized the importance of this effort: “The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.”

This renewed focus aligns with the Trump administration’s broader effort to reshape the U.S. immigration system. President Trump has made immigration policy a central issue in his governance, seeking to end birthright citizenship and reduce refugee admissions. These moves reflect a fundamental redefinition of who is entitled to American citizenship.

However, constitutional scholars and immigration experts have expressed significant alarm about this denaturalization push. Cassandra Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, noted that the DOJ’s reliance on civil litigation for denaturalization raises serious concerns. In civil court, those targeted do not have the right to government-appointed attorneys, the standard of proof is lower, and cases can be resolved more quickly.

Robertson warned, “Stripping Americans of citizenship through civil litigation violates due process and infringes on the rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.”

Still, the move has supporters. Hans von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation endorsed the initiative, stating, “I do not understand how anyone could possibly be opposed to the Justice Department taking such action to protect the nation from obvious predators, criminals, and terrorists.” Regarding concerns over legal representation, he added, “Nothing prevents that alien from hiring their own lawyer to represent them. They are not entitled to have the government — and thus the American taxpayer — pay for their lawyer.”

He further argued, “That is not a ‘due process’ violation since all immigration proceedings are civil matters and no individuals — including American citizens — are entitled to government-furnished lawyers in any type of civil matter.”

Neither the DOJ nor the Trump White House commented on the matter.

The June 11 memo significantly broadens the categories of offenses that could trigger denaturalization. These include crimes related to national security and fraud against individuals or the government, such as Paycheck Protection Program loan fraud or Medicaid and Medicare fraud.

Sameera Hafiz, policy director at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, described the administration’s new approach as “very shocking and very concerning.” She stated, “It is kind of, in a way, trying to create a second class of U.S. citizens,” implying that naturalized citizens remain vulnerable to losing their status despite having followed legal processes.

Adding to these concerns, the memo grants federal attorneys the discretion to pursue denaturalization cases beyond the listed categories. “These categories do not limit the Civil Division from pursuing any particular case,” the memo reads, further noting that priorities may include “any other cases referred to the Civil Division that the Division determines to be sufficiently important to pursue.”

Steve Lubet, professor emeritus at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law, found this language troubling. “Many of the categories are so vague as to be meaningless. It isn’t even clear that they relate to fraudulent procurement, as opposed to post-naturalization conduct,” he observed.

Von Spakovsky countered that the government is right to be uncompromising. “When we extend the opportunity for naturalization to aliens, we are granting them a great privilege — the privilege of becoming a U.S. citizen,” he said. “Anyone who has abused the privilege of the opportunity of becoming a U.S. citizen should have that citizenship revoked when they engage in such reprehensible behavior.”

Lubet also pointed out the broader implications for families, particularly children who derived citizenship through a naturalized parent. “People who thought they were safely American and had done nothing wrong can suddenly be at risk of losing citizenship,” he said.

The DOJ did not address questions about how children of denaturalized parents would be affected or what would happen if individuals were rendered stateless.

The case of Elliott Duke appears to be an early example of how the new denaturalization efforts might play out. Duke, who became a U.S. citizen in January 2013, was found to have started distributing child sexual abuse material while serving in Germany in 2012. Duke relinquished their U.K. citizenship to become an American. The DOJ filed the case in February in Louisiana, citing both the prior conviction and Duke’s failure to disclose criminal activity during the naturalization process.

During the legal proceedings, Duke struggled to secure representation and could not attend court in Louisiana. “My heart shattered when I read the lines [of the order]. My world broke apart,” Duke said.

Shumate, in a statement, warned, “If you commit serious crimes before you become a U.S. citizen and then lie about them during your naturalization process, the Justice Department will discover the truth and come after you.”

Laura Bingham, executive director of the Temple University Institute for Law Innovation and Technology, cautioned that the Duke case sets a worrying precedent. “Citizenship is not supposed to be something that you can continuously open up for some people, and you can’t for others,” she said.

Historically, denaturalization surged during the McCarthy era, with over 22,000 cases filed annually. “At the height of denaturalization, there were about 22,000 cases a year… It was huge,” Robertson recalled. However, a 1967 Supreme Court ruling curtailed the practice, citing its incompatibility with democratic values.

From that point until the Obama era, denaturalization became rare. The Obama administration revived it with initiatives like Operation Janus, which sought out potential naturalization fraud, especially linked to national security concerns.

Trump’s first term saw further expansion, with a preference for pursuing denaturalization through civil rather than criminal courts. Although Robertson questions how many cases will meet the criteria outlined in the recent memo, she fears the aggressive push may target individuals with minimal infractions. “It fits in with the other ways that we’ve seen immigration enforcement happening,” she said.

This recent policy shift marks a significant chapter in U.S. immigration enforcement, raising crucial questions about due process, equal protection, and the long-term security of naturalized citizenship.

US Embassy in India Emphasizes Strict Visa Screening and Social Media Disclosure as National Security Measure

The United States Embassy in India has reiterated the stringent vetting procedures tied to its visa policies, describing each visa adjudication as a matter of national security. In a statement posted on the social media platform X, the embassy highlighted the requirement for all applicants to provide complete details of their social media presence over the last five years while applying for nonimmigrant visas.

“Visa applicants are required to list all social media usernames or handles of every platform they have used from the last 5 years on the DS-160 visa application form. Applicants certify that the information in their visa application is true and correct before they sign and submit,” stated the US Embassy in a recent post.

This disclosure requirement, according to the embassy, is an integral part of the broader national security screening process employed by the United States. Failing to comply with this requirement could have serious consequences. “Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas,” the post further warned.

This advisory is part of a broader campaign by the embassy to inform and caution visa applicants about the importance of accuracy and transparency in their applications. The embassy’s post included digital posters reiterating the security aspect of the visa process. One poster read, “Every U.S. visa adjudication is a national security decision,” and emphasized, “The United States requires visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on visa application forms. We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting.”

In a related update earlier this month, the embassy had urged applicants falling under F, M, or J non-immigrant visa categories to make their social media accounts public. This recommendation was made to aid US authorities in verifying applicants’ identities and establishing their admissibility under American law. These visa categories include F and M for students and J for exchange visitors.

The embassy elaborated that since 2019, the United States has mandated the disclosure of “social media identifiers” as part of both immigrant and non-immigrant visa applications. This long-standing requirement, according to the embassy, is vital to national security and helps immigration authorities thoroughly vet each applicant.

The embassy’s statements come amid a wider crackdown on immigration in the United States. Recently, the Trump administration intensified enforcement actions in Los Angeles, targeting immigration violations more aggressively. In light of this, the US Embassy in India has stepped up its communication, providing frequent updates on policy and legal expectations for visa applicants.

On June 24, the embassy issued another warning, stating that immigration law enforcement had been stepped up across the country. The message was unambiguous—those found violating immigration laws would face strict penalties, including detention, deportation, and permanent ineligibility for future visas.

Adding to this, the embassy’s statement noted, “The US had increased enforcement of immigration laws, and violators would face detention, deportation and permanent consequences for future visa eligibility.” The warning was not limited to overstays or misrepresentation; it also made it clear that illegal entry into the United States would result in jail time and removal from the country.

This was not the only caution issued during the month. On June 19, the embassy released another strongly worded statement reminding applicants that obtaining a US visa is not a guaranteed right but a discretionary privilege. It emphasized that screening and scrutiny continue even after a visa is issued. Authorities in the US reserve the right to revoke a visa if the holder is found in violation of any laws.

The embassy said, “A US visa was a privilege, not a right,” underscoring that post-issuance reviews are routine and can result in visa cancellation if necessary. It further added that involvement in illegal activities, including drug use or breaking US laws while in the country on a student or visitor visa, could severely impact one’s ability to receive future visas.

This line of messaging from the US Embassy in India has been consistent throughout the month. The campaign has included reminders that although the US continues to welcome legal travelers, any attempt to enter the country illegally or abuse the visa system will not be tolerated.

Reiterating this stance, the embassy made a significant statement on June 16, asserting that the United States “will not tolerate those who facilitate illegal and mass immigration to the US.” This message also revealed a policy shift: the US had introduced “new visa restrictions” aimed specifically at foreign government officials and individuals who violate immigration laws.

This multi-pronged approach by the US government reflects a broader tightening of immigration and visa processes, especially in the wake of mounting concerns around illegal immigration. With policies targeting both individual applicants and those facilitating unlawful entry, the US is sending a clear signal about the importance of legal compliance.

By highlighting these issues through multiple channels and on various dates, the US Embassy in India is working to ensure that prospective travelers are well aware of the rules and expectations. The detailed advisories, warnings about visa ineligibility, and emphasis on national security collectively serve to underline the gravity with which the US government views visa applications.

These measures not only aim to safeguard national interests but also serve as a deterrent for those considering bypassing legal immigration processes. By requiring disclosure of social media identifiers, encouraging transparency, and increasing legal enforcement, the United States is fortifying its immigration system against potential risks.

At the same time, the US government continues to stress that it welcomes legal immigration and supports those who abide by the rules. But any deviation from lawful practices will result in serious and lasting consequences.

The embassy’s message, repeated throughout June, is unambiguous: compliance with visa rules, honesty in the application process, and adherence to US laws are non-negotiable. The US authorities are equipped to detect discrepancies and enforce immigration laws without hesitation.

From urging public visibility of social media accounts to warning against drug use and law violations, the embassy has rolled out a series of reminders to leave no room for misunderstanding. These reminders serve both as guidance for sincere applicants and a deterrent for those contemplating any kind of misuse of the system.

Ultimately, the consistent tone and content of the embassy’s advisories reflect a strategic policy direction that prioritizes national security while maintaining opportunities for legal entry. Through transparency, accountability, and firm enforcement, the United States aims to maintain the integrity of its immigration system.

Shifting Social Security Rules Push Retirement Age Higher: How Americans Can Strategize Early Retirement Plans

For many years, the age of 65 has represented a symbolic point at which Americans envisioned hanging up their work boots and enjoying retirement. However, due to a series of gradual legislative changes, the Social Security system is moving the goalposts. Starting in 2025, individuals born in 1959 will reach full retirement age (FRA) at 66 years and 10 months. For everyone born in 1960 or later, the FRA will be a full 67 years. While this shift might appear minor, its financial effects are far from negligible, particularly for those considering retiring early.

These changes reflect long-term policy decisions intended to keep the Social Security system financially sustainable. Understanding how the adjustments impact benefits and creating a financial plan tailored to these evolving realities is crucial for ensuring a comfortable retirement.

Understanding the Adjustment to Full Retirement Age

The phased increase in the full retirement age can be traced back to the 1983 Social Security Amendments, which were designed to improve the program’s long-term viability. These amendments incrementally raised the FRA from the longstanding age of 65 to 67. The implementation has been gradual, increasing by two months for each birth year.

For example:

  • Those born in 1958 face an FRA of 66 years and 8 months
  • Individuals born in 1959 will reach FRA at 66 years and 10 months
  • Anyone born in 1960 or after will face an FRA of 67

Though people can start claiming Social Security as early as age 62, doing so comes with a permanent reduction in benefits. For those born in 1959, claiming benefits at 62 results in about a 29% decrease in monthly payments. The cut increases to 30% for those born in 1960 or later.

On the other hand, delaying benefits past FRA can result in an 8% annual boost, continuing until age 70. If you wait until then, you can receive up to 32% more each month. These numbers can significantly impact your long-term financial picture.

How to Handle the Income Gap Before Full Benefits

While many workers aim to retire before hitting FRA, doing so without careful planning can harm long-term financial health. Several strategies can help bridge the income gap from early retirement until full Social Security benefits become available.

One practical method is phased retirement. Instead of leaving the workforce entirely, you might negotiate a lighter schedule—working three or four days per week. Even working 15 to 20 hours weekly can help cover essential expenses and slow the depletion of your savings.

Another recommended approach is building a financial buffer. Experts advise saving enough to cover 18 to 24 months of living expenses in a high-yield savings or money market account. This safety net allows you to avoid dipping into long-term investments during volatile market periods.

Unused personal assets can also generate income. For instance, homeowners might consider renting out a spare room, potentially bringing in $700 to $1,000 per month. If you live in an urban area, leasing your driveway for parking could yield $150 to $300 per month.

There’s also the option of taking on a bridge job that offers both pay and benefits. Employers like Costco, Home Depot, and Trader Joe’s often hire part-time workers and provide health coverage for those working 20 to 28 hours weekly. These roles are especially attractive for early retirees looking for flexibility and medical benefits.

Making Withdrawals Work for You

If you retire before age 65 or delay claiming Social Security, your finances will depend heavily on personal savings. Using tax-efficient withdrawal strategies can minimize your tax burden and help your money go further.

One approach is to withdraw from taxable brokerage accounts first. This avoids early withdrawal penalties and allows retirement accounts to continue growing in a tax-advantaged environment.

You can also tap into Roth IRA contributions at any time without penalties or taxes, as long as you only withdraw the contributions and not the earnings. This provides an additional source of tax-free income.

Keeping your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) low is another valuable tactic. A lower MAGI can help you qualify for subsidies under the Affordable Care Act, which can dramatically reduce health insurance costs before you’re eligible for Medicare at age 65.

Generating Side Income Can Help Too

If you’re looking for extra income without the responsibilities of a full-time job, side gigs can offer flexibility and supplemental cash flow. Tutoring, for example, pays between $30 and $50 per hour and can be done on your schedule. Other options include pet sitting, dog walking, or selling crafts through platforms like Etsy.

Prepare for the Possibility of Future Policy Changes

Though the FRA currently caps at 67, ongoing discussions in Washington suggest it could rise further. Some proposals have floated the idea of increasing it to 68 or even 69, citing long-term funding concerns for the Social Security system. While these are not yet law, staying prepared for further changes is wise.

To stay ahead, build a plan that allows for delayed benefits if necessary. Emergency savings and alternative income sources offer greater financial flexibility. Regularly reviewing your retirement income plan will also help you adapt to any policy shifts.

Conclusion: Retirement on Your Own Terms

The gradual rise in Social Security’s full retirement age might seem like a bureaucratic detail, but for millions of Americans, it redefines when and how retirement can happen. Without planning, it can mean smaller monthly checks and more years of work. However, by strategically saving, leveraging assets, working part-time, and utilizing smart withdrawal tactics, you can take control of your financial future.

Retirement shouldn’t be defined by a government schedule. With a solid plan in place, you can retire when you’re ready—on your own terms.

By recognizing the impact of changing policies and preparing accordingly, you give yourself the freedom to shape your own retirement journey.

House Passes Bill to Deport Noncitizens Convicted of Drunk Driving

The U.S. House of Representatives on Friday passed a bill that would mandate the deportation of noncitizens convicted of driving under the influence, according to a report by Breitbart. The legislation, titled the Jeremy and Angel Seay and Sergeant Brandon Mendoza Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act, was put forward by Representative Barry Moore, a Republican from Alabama. The bill is named in remembrance of victims who lost their lives due to accidents caused by intoxicated migrant drivers.

Representative Moore introduced the legislation to honor Jeremy and Angel Seay, a couple from his district, who were tragically killed when a noncitizen driving under the influence struck them while they were riding a motorcycle. Speaking to the Alabama Daily News, Moore said, “Their lives were cut short by the senseless act.” He added, “Tragedies like this are not uncommon across this country,” emphasizing the wider impact of such incidents involving impaired driving by noncitizens.

The bill has ignited a heated debate in Congress, receiving overwhelming support from Republican lawmakers. Most Republicans view the legislation as a necessary measure to safeguard American communities from individuals who repeatedly break laws and endanger lives through reckless behavior such as drunk driving. The bill aims to amend existing immigration policy by making DUI convictions grounds for mandatory deportation.

In contrast, 160 Democrats voted against the bill, raising concerns about the potential for overly broad enforcement and its implications for immigration justice. Opponents argue that while DUI offenses are serious, automatic deportation removes the opportunity for due process or context to be considered, especially for immigrants who may have lived in the U.S. for extended periods or have deep family and community ties.

Despite the partisan split, the legislation’s passage in the House marks a significant step in the ongoing political effort to link public safety and immigration enforcement. The bill now moves to the Senate, where its future remains uncertain, particularly given the different power dynamics and legislative priorities in that chamber.

Representative Moore, in advocating for the legislation, has highlighted personal tragedies such as those experienced by the Seay family to bring attention to what he sees as preventable deaths caused by lax immigration enforcement. By attaching specific names to the bill, including that of Sergeant Brandon Mendoza, a police officer killed in a similar incident, Moore is stressing the real-world consequences of policy gaps. Mendoza’s case, like that of the Seays, has become a symbol in political discussions about the intersection of immigration and criminal law.

“Their lives were cut short by the senseless act,” Moore repeated in statements to the press, underscoring the emotional weight behind the legislation. His remarks reflect a broader Republican viewpoint that public safety should take precedence in immigration decisions, especially when there is a criminal record involved.

The bill’s language stipulates that any noncitizen convicted of driving under the influence would be subject to mandatory removal from the United States. Supporters argue that the measure closes a loophole that allows dangerous individuals to remain in the country despite endangering others through impaired driving. Critics, however, caution that the legislation could lead to disproportionate punishment and may particularly impact certain immigrant communities more heavily than others.

Immigration rights groups and some Democratic lawmakers have expressed concerns that such legislation could further criminalize immigrant populations and erode trust between law enforcement and communities. They argue that while preventing DUI-related deaths is important, a one-size-fits-all deportation policy fails to take into account rehabilitation efforts, family situations, and other mitigating circumstances.

Still, proponents believe the law will serve as a deterrent to noncitizens who might otherwise engage in reckless behavior. By introducing automatic consequences for DUI convictions, supporters contend that the law strengthens both immigration policy and public safety.

The bill’s naming after specific victims adds a human face to what is otherwise a policy discussion, which may help in gaining public support. The use of personal stories has become a common legislative strategy to create empathy and urgency around specific issues, and Moore’s bill is a prominent example.

While the political divide on immigration-related bills continues to grow, this legislation’s focus on DUI offenses could garner some bipartisan interest in the Senate, especially among lawmakers who prioritize public safety. However, it is expected that the bill will face stronger opposition in the Senate, where Democratic control and a more moderate stance on immigration issues could result in amendments or outright rejection.

For now, the bill’s approval in the House reflects a broader Republican push to tighten immigration enforcement and prioritize citizen safety, especially in cases involving criminal behavior. Whether or not this bill becomes law, it has already sparked a national conversation about how the U.S. should handle immigration enforcement in cases involving criminal activity, and how policy can be crafted to prevent further tragedies like those that took the lives of Jeremy and Angel Seay.

With its passage, the House has signaled its stance on the matter, placing the burden of next steps on the Senate. If the bill passes there, it could significantly alter how DUI offenses are treated in the context of immigration law, potentially impacting thousands of noncitizens across the country.

Until then, the debate over balancing compassion in immigration policy with accountability for criminal conduct is likely to continue, both in Congress and among the American public.

Discovery of TOI-1452 b: A Possible Ocean World Just 100 Light-Years from Earth Sparks Scientific Excitement

A remarkable exoplanet located merely 100 light-years away from Earth has caught the attention of the astronomical community. Identified as TOI-1452 b, this celestial body is not just another planet outside our solar system—it might be the first documented “ocean planet.” Scientists believe that up to 30% of this planet could be covered in water. The potential presence of such a large amount of water on a distant planet is stirring conversations about the possibility of life beyond Earth.

What makes this finding even more intriguing is the apparent contradiction between the planet’s physical characteristics and current scientific understanding. TOI-1452 b orbits a star in a zone where prevailing theories in physics and chemistry suggest that liquid water shouldn’t be able to exist. Despite this, all available data points to the possible presence of vast water reserves. As one researcher observed, “The unthinkable seems real: TOI-1452 b challenges everything we thought we knew about exoplanets!”

This potentially groundbreaking discovery has prompted many scientists to label TOI-1452 b as a kind of cosmic cousin to Earth, albeit a more distant and significantly larger one. In terms of physical features, this exoplanet has an ideal combination of properties that set it apart: low density, a balanced temperature based on the energy it receives from its star, and a substantial size.

Initial scientific assessments hint that the planet might be composed of layers of water or ice, possibly resembling the hidden subsurface oceans found on some of our solar system’s moons, such as Ganymede and Enceladus. Located in the Draco constellation, TOI-1452 b is also perfectly positioned for detailed study by the James Webb Space Telescope. The telescope is already being readied to analyze the planet’s atmosphere for any indicators of habitability—or even signs of life.

From a classification standpoint, TOI-1452 b qualifies as a “super-Earth.” Although the term may sound dramatic, it simply refers to a type of rocky planet that is larger than Earth but smaller than the gas giants such as Neptune or Jupiter. With a diameter 70% greater than Earth’s and a mass approximately five times larger, it certainly earns this designation.

What really piqued scientists’ interest was the planet’s density. Based on the numbers, something didn’t quite add up. A planet of that size and mass should be composed primarily of rock or metal, but the relatively low density pointed to another possibility. “Was it a bird? A plane? No! Water!” one scientist quipped, highlighting their conclusion that the most plausible explanation for the low density is a substantial water composition. The presence of such a significant amount of water would also explain how the planet could support potentially habitable conditions, despite its closeness to its host star.

Indeed, TOI-1452 b orbits its star in just 11 Earth days, indicating that it lies very close to the star. Under normal circumstances, a planet in such proximity would be far too hot to support liquid water. However, TOI-1452 b’s host star is not a sun-like star. It is a red dwarf, significantly smaller and cooler than our Sun. This difference may allow the planet to retain moderate temperatures, potentially supporting water in its liquid state. “Isn’t it incredible?” the article exclaims, reflecting widespread astonishment in the scientific community.

To uncover more about this strange world, all eyes are now on the James Webb Space Telescope. The plan is to analyze the exoplanet’s atmosphere as it transits across the face of its star. This method allows researchers to detect specific gases, such as water vapor or hydrogen, in the planet’s atmosphere. Scientists are even optimistic about the possibility of detecting organic molecules—biosignatures that could indicate the presence of life. Are we witnessing the first step toward discovering life beyond Earth?

The label “water world” is not given lightly. While the presence of water on TOI-1452 b has not yet been directly confirmed, the planet exhibits more Earth-like features than any previously discovered exoplanet. That alone makes it a strong candidate for the first confirmed water-covered planet outside our solar system. “We can say that TOI-1452 b is emerging as the planet with the most characteristics similar to Earth,” notes the report.

The broader scientific mission remains focused on understanding how planetary systems form and evolve. However, discoveries like TOI-1452 b inevitably turn the discussion toward the age-old question of life beyond Earth. Based on what is currently known, it’s conceivable that TOI-1452 b could support life in ways similar to Earth. Although, as the article humorously suggests, “maybe they’re not as conflictive as us humans.”

One of the most exciting implications of this discovery is what it suggests about the prevalence of habitable planets in our galaxy. If a planet so close to its star can sustain large quantities of water, perhaps the criteria scientists use to define “habitable zones” have been too narrow. Without a doubt, what stands out most about this discovery is that, if a planet so close to its star can have large amounts of water, we may have underestimated the number of habitable worlds in our galaxy!

In essence, TOI-1452 b may be more than just an exciting discovery. It could mark a turning point in the search for extraterrestrial life, redefining what scientists look for when evaluating whether a planet might support life. As technology advances and more exoplanets like this are observed, the chances of finding a truly Earth-like world—or even alien life—continue to grow.

Rupee at Record High in Real Effective Terms Despite Dollar Weakness

The Indian rupee is hitting new lows against the US dollar, but its value has surged to an all-time high in “real effective” terms.

According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the rupee’s Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) index reached a record level of 108.14 in November, showing a 4.5% appreciation this calendar year. The REER is a measure that compares the rupee’s value not only against the US dollar but also against other global currencies. This index accounts for inflation differences between India and its trading partners and is calculated as a weighted average of the rupee’s exchange rates with 40 currencies, covering around 88% of India’s annual trade.

The rupee’s REER, using 2015-16 as the base year and assigning currency weights based on trade shares, initially declined from 105.32 in January 2022 to 99.03 in April 2023. However, it has been on an upward trend since then, climbing to 107.20 in October and peaking at 108.14 in November.

Why the Divergence in Rupee Trends?

The apparent contradiction—where the rupee weakens while simultaneously strengthening—can be attributed to the US dollar’s movements over the last three months, especially following Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential elections on November 5.

During the period from September 27 to December 24, the dollar index futures, which measure the dollar’s value against six other major currencies (euro, Japanese yen, British pound, Canadian dollar, Swedish krona, and Swiss franc), rose from 99.88 to 108.02. Much of this increase occurred after November 5, when the index was at 102.98.

In the same timeframe, the rupee depreciated from 83.67 to 85.19 against the dollar. However, it appreciated against other major currencies: from 93.46 to 88.56 against the euro, 112.05 to 106.79 against the British pound, and 0.5823 to 0.5425 against the Japanese yen.

Challenges for Exporters

A REER value above 100 indicates an overvalued rupee, meaning its exchange rate has not depreciated enough to balance out India’s higher domestic inflation. This overvaluation makes imports cheaper but reduces the competitiveness of Indian exports in global markets.

Effectively, while the rupee has weakened against the dollar, it hasn’t depreciated as much as the dollar has strengthened relative to other currencies. This strengthening of the dollar has been driven by Trump’s policy outlook, which includes proposed tariff hikes, particularly on Chinese imports, deficit-funded tax cuts, and plans for mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. If implemented, these policies could fuel inflation in the US, compelling the Federal Reserve to maintain a tight monetary stance.

The tightening monetary environment in the US has led to a surge in 10-year government bond yields, which rose from 3.75% to 4.59% between September 27 and December 24. This, in turn, has triggered capital outflows from countries like India to the US, further pressuring the rupee.

A Broader Perspective

Since the beginning of 2022, the rupee has generally weakened against major currencies. It declined from 74.30 to 85.19 against the dollar, 84.04 to 88.56 against the euro, and 100.30 to 106.79 against the pound. The only exception was the Japanese yen, where the rupee strengthened from 0.6454 to 0.5425.

Despite this depreciation against most currencies, the REER index for the rupee has risen. This paradox is mainly due to India’s inflation rate outpacing those of its major trading partners.

Assuming the rupee was “fairly” valued in 2015-16, when the REER base was set at 100, any value above 100 indicates overvaluation. This suggests that the rupee’s exchange rate has not fallen enough to compensate for India’s higher inflation. As a result, imports have become cheaper, and exports less competitive.

RBI’s Stance on the Rupee

The RBI seems to be tolerating a depreciation of the rupee, at least against the dollar, to address these imbalances. Analysts point to the central bank’s efforts to allow market forces to guide the currency, thereby improving the competitiveness of Indian exports.

“The rupee is highly overvalued today, making imports into India cheaper and exports less cost-competitive,” experts note. This overvaluation underscores the challenges faced by exporters, particularly in a global environment where the dollar’s dominance affects currency markets worldwide.

In summary, while the rupee’s REER highlights its relative strength in real effective terms, its simultaneous depreciation against the dollar reflects the broader pressures of global economic dynamics, driven significantly by US policies and market expectations.

US Campuses on Edge Ahead of Trump’s Return: International Students Brace for Changes

As President-elect Donald Trump’s January 20 inauguration approaches, anxiety and uncertainty are growing across US college campuses. Many universities have urged international students to return early from winter break, fearing a repeat of the previous travel ban that left students stranded during Trump’s earlier term.

The United States, which hosted over 1.1 million international students in the 2023-24 academic year, could see renewed challenges for these students. Trump has promised stricter immigration measures, including an expanded travel ban targeting predominantly Muslim countries and plans to revoke visas for students deemed “radical anti-American and antisemitic.”

International students, who typically hold nonimmigrant visas allowing them to study but not reside permanently in the US, find themselves in a precarious position. “It’s a scary time for international students,” remarked Pramath Pratap Misra, a 23-year-old political science graduate from New York University (NYU). NYU had the nation’s largest population of international students last year, with over 27,000 enrolled.

Amid final exams and winter travel plans, students across the country are preparing for potential disruptions. Universities have cautioned against leaving the US before the inauguration, fearing new restrictions.

Cornell University’s Office of Global Learning has advised students to return before January 21, when spring classes begin. The office warned that “a travel ban is likely to go into effect soon after inauguration,” possibly affecting citizens from countries previously included in Trump’s first ban—such as Iran, Libya, and Syria—as well as potentially adding nations like China and India.

Similarly, the University of Southern California (USC), which has the highest number of international students in California, encouraged students to arrive by January 6. In an email, the USC Office of International Service said, “The safest way to avoid any challenges is to be physically present in the U.S. before the Spring semester begins.”

Trump’s proposed “mass deportations” have further amplified concerns, not just for workers in industries like agriculture and healthcare but also for students. While Trump has also suggested granting green cards to international graduates of US colleges, his campaign clarified that only “the most skilled graduates” would qualify. These individuals would undergo strict screenings to exclude “communists, radical Islamists, Hamas supporters, America haters, and public charges.”

For students like Gabrielle Balreira Fontenelle Mota, a 21-year-old Brazilian studying journalism and international relations at NYU, the uncertainty is unsettling. “I’m not from a Muslim country or from China, which are places that Trump usually criticizes,” she explained. “What makes me a little bit more concerned is the ideological screenings that he said he will be implementing.”

In response, NYU reassured its international community, emphasizing the importance of cross-border student mobility. “We will be monitoring any immigration-related proposals, laws, and actions that could be of concern to our community,” the university stated in a post-election email.

Other universities have also taken proactive measures. The University of Massachusetts Amherst has urged international students to return before the new administration takes office, citing “an abundance of caution.” The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) advised against relying on social media rumors when making travel decisions.

Meanwhile, Northeastern University, which has the second-largest international student body after NYU, suggested students return by January 6 to avoid disruptions. Harvard University echoed similar advice, urging students to budget time ahead of the semester start to mitigate risks.

For some, the looming challenges recall Trump’s first term, marked by efforts to restrict immigration across various categories. “The best way to anticipate or predict what will happen in the second Trump administration is to look at what happened in the first administration,” noted Stuart Anderson, executive director of the National Foundation for American Policy.

As universities brace for potential policy shifts, the fear of restrictive immigration measures weighs heavily on students and faculty alike, casting a shadow over the upcoming semester.

India to Have the Largest Muslim Population by 2050, Study Predicts

The world is home to a variety of religions, including Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Jainism, Zoroastrianism, and Sikhism. Among these, Islam stands out as the fastest-growing religion globally. A report by the Pew Research Center titled The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010-2050 projects a significant shift in global Muslim demographics. By 2050, India is expected to surpass Indonesia and become the country with the largest Muslim population, estimated at 311 million.

Muslim and Hindu Population Projections

According to the report, India’s Muslim population, which accounted for 14.4% of the total population in 2010, is projected to rise to 18.4% by 2050. This growth will make India home to 11% of the global Muslim population. Pakistan, currently second to Indonesia in terms of Muslim population, is expected to rank second globally by 2050, with 273 million Muslims. Indonesia, which held the top spot in 2010, is likely to fall to third place with 257 million Muslims.

In addition to the growth of the Muslim population, the report highlights the significant size of India’s Hindu population. By 2050, India is projected to have 1.03 billion Hindus, maintaining its position as the country with the largest Hindu population. Globally, Hindus will become the third-largest religious group by mid-century.

Currently, the Hindu population in India is not only substantial but also surpasses the Muslim populations of the largest Muslim-majority countries, including Pakistan, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Bangladesh.

Fertility Rates and Age Dynamics

One key factor driving the rapid growth of India’s Muslim population is the higher fertility rate among Muslims. The Pew Research Center study notes that Muslim women in India have an average of 3.2 children, compared to 2.5 children for Hindu women and 2.3 children for Christian women. The younger median age of Muslims also contributes to this trend. Globally, the average age for Muslims is 22 years, compared to 26 years for Hindus and 28 years for Christians.

This demographic advantage, coupled with higher fertility rates, positions the Muslim population to grow more rapidly than other religious groups in India. Meanwhile, the growth rate for Hindus and Christians is expected to be more moderate, with India’s Christian population decreasing slightly from 2.5% of the total population in 2010 to 2.3% by 2050.

Global Growth of Islam

The report also emphasizes Islam’s position as the fastest-growing major religion worldwide. In 2010, there were 1.6 billion Muslims globally, making up approximately 23% of the world’s population. By 2050, the Muslim population is expected to reach 2.8 billion, an increase of 73%. This growth rate is significantly faster than the global population’s projected growth of 35% during the same period.

As of now, Islam is the second-largest religion after Christianity. However, current demographic trends suggest that by the end of this century, Muslims could outnumber Christians globally. This is attributed to higher fertility rates and a younger median age among Muslims compared to other religious groups.

Regional Distribution of Muslims

A substantial majority of the world’s Muslim population resides in the Asia-Pacific region. As of now, approximately 72% of Muslims live in this region, which includes countries like Indonesia, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iran, and Turkey. Indonesia, currently home to the largest Muslim population, will cede this position to India by 2050.

The projected demographic shift is a significant milestone in global religious dynamics. By mid-century, India’s Muslim population, at 310 million, will surpass Indonesia’s, marking a historic change in the distribution of the world’s Muslim population.

Future Implications

The Pew Research Center’s findings underscore the transformative impact of demographic trends on the global religious landscape. The rapid growth of the Muslim population, both in India and worldwide, reflects broader patterns of fertility, age distribution, and regional concentrations. These changes have implications for cultural, social, and political dynamics in the decades to come.

As the report concludes, “The future of the world’s religions is being shaped by two overarching factors: differences in fertility rates and the size of youth populations among the world’s major religions.” These trends are poised to redefine religious demographics and influence global interactions in significant ways.

Manmohan Singh, Former Indian Prime Minister and Economic Reformer, Passes Away at 92

Manmohan Singh, one of India’s most revered leaders and the architect of the country’s economic liberalization, has passed away at the age of 92. Singh, who served as India’s Prime Minister from 2004 to 2014, was instrumental in introducing key economic reforms during his tenure as finance minister in the early 1990s.

Admitted to a hospital in Delhi following a decline in health, Singh’s passing prompted tributes from leaders across the political spectrum. Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed his condolences, calling Singh “one of India’s most distinguished leaders” and commending his wisdom and dedication to improving lives. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi remembered Singh as a mentor and guide, while Priyanka Gandhi described him as “wise, egalitarian, strong-willed, and courageous.”

Early Life and Education

Born on September 26, 1932, in a remote village in Punjab, Singh overcame significant hardships. His village lacked basic amenities like water and electricity. Singh pursued higher education with remarkable determination, earning a master’s degree from the University of Cambridge and a doctorate from Oxford University. Despite financial struggles during his studies, he excelled academically, laying the foundation for his illustrious career.

A Reformist Leader

Singh’s political prominence rose in 1991 when, as finance minister, he spearheaded transformative economic reforms that revitalized a near-bankrupt India. In his maiden budget speech, he famously quoted Victor Hugo, declaring, “No power on Earth can stop an idea whose time has come.” His reforms, which included tax cuts, rupee devaluation, privatization, and opening up to foreign investment, ushered in an era of rapid industrial growth and economic stability.

Prime Ministerial Tenure

In 2004, Singh became India’s Prime Minister, the first Sikh to hold the position, following Congress leader Sonia Gandhi’s decision to decline the role. His leadership secured India’s re-entry into the global nuclear community through a landmark deal with the United States, though the agreement faced strong political opposition domestically.

Known as a consensus builder, Singh managed a coalition government despite frequent challenges from assertive regional allies. However, his second term was overshadowed by allegations of corruption and policy paralysis, culminating in Congress’s defeat in the 2014 elections.

Foreign Policy and Legacy

As Prime Minister, Singh adopted pragmatic foreign policies, strengthening ties with Afghanistan, reopening trade routes with China, and continuing peace talks with Pakistan. However, his decision to distance India from traditional ally Iran drew criticism.

Singh’s calm demeanor, academic rigor, and integrity earned him respect across party lines. Despite facing allegations of corruption during his tenure, he maintained that his government worked with “utmost commitment and dedication.”

A Quiet Statesman

Singh’s low-profile nature stood out in the political arena. Known for his reserved demeanor, he often avoided confrontation, stating that “silence is better than a thousand answers.” Even after leaving office, Singh remained active in public discourse, offering solutions during the economic challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Singh will be remembered as the leader who steered India out of economic and nuclear isolation. While some critics felt he stayed in politics too long, Singh himself believed that “history will be kinder to me than the contemporary media or opposition.”

Manmohan Singh is survived by his wife, Gursharan Kaur, and their three daughters. His contributions to India’s economic and political landscape will be remembered as a defining chapter in the nation’s history.

Macron Vows Resilience Amid Political Turmoil Following No-Confidence Vote

French President Emmanuel Macron, facing mounting political challenges, announced plans to appoint a new prime minister within days during a televised address on Thursday. His defiant tone sought to address the fallout from Prime Minister Michel Barnier’s ousting in a historic no-confidence vote a day earlier. However, his remarks are unlikely to quell the intensifying political crisis.

The no-confidence vote, a rare occurrence in French politics, was propelled by an alliance between left-wing and far-right lawmakers, marking a significant setback for Macron’s administration. In response, the president refrained from conceding any personal failures, instead directing criticism at the factions that united to topple Barnier’s government.

Macron singled out the far-right National Rally, led by Marine Le Pen, accusing the party of orchestrating political instability. “The extreme right and the extreme left united together in an anti-Republican front,” he stated, referencing the coalition that led to Barnier’s downfall. This political vacuum complicates Macron’s agenda, particularly his push for a contentious budget.

Following the no-confidence vote, Barnier submitted his resignation, which Macron accepted on Thursday. Until a new government is formed, Barnier will serve in a caretaker role. “Let’s be honest, they think about one thing: the presidential election,” Macron remarked, criticizing Le Pen’s party for what he described as a “cynical” strategy that had fostered “a sense of chaos” across France. He further accused them of prioritizing disorder over governance, stating, “They insulted their own voters, and they have chosen simply disorder.”

During his address, Macron expressed optimism about a turning point in French politics. “From today, it’s [a] new era,” he declared, urging the National Assembly to fulfill its mandate and act “in the service of the French people.” However, his ability to usher in a smoother era remains uncertain. The selection of a new prime minister must gain approval from a deeply divided parliament, where opposition persists on both sides of the political spectrum.

Macron, now halfway through his second and final presidential term, faces diminished authority domestically and internationally. The snap election he called in June, intended to solidify his mandate, resulted in a fractured parliament, complicating his governance in the critical final years of his presidency. Further complicating matters, another snap election is not possible until June 2025, leaving Macron to navigate a highly polarized legislative body in the meantime.

The president initially sought to bridge the divide in parliament by appointing Barnier in September, hoping to balance support across political factions. However, his approach proved unsuccessful, and Macron may now focus on consolidating support from one side, potentially alienating the other. His address suggested little willingness to compromise with Le Pen, whose party remains steadfast in its opposition. On Thursday, Le Pen told French network CNews, “We have not changed our minds: we are opposed to a left-wing Prime Minister,” signaling continued resistance to any move that marginalizes her political bloc.

Adding to the urgency, the government must finalize a budget by December 21 to prevent a potential fiscal crisis. Failure to meet this deadline could result in the implementation of a “fiscal continuity law,” which would allow the government to continue essential operations. According to credit rating agency S&P Global Ratings, this stopgap measure would enable tax collection and salary payments but cap spending at 2024 levels.

Barnier’s government became the first in France to be toppled by a no-confidence vote since 1962, a reflection of the deep divisions within the current parliament. At the center of the dispute was a proposed financing bill aimed at reducing the country’s budget deficit to 5% by next year. The bill included €60 billion ($63 billion) in tax increases and spending cuts, measures that faced staunch opposition from various quarters. Among the contentious provisions was a delay in matching pension increases to inflation, a move that drew sharp criticism from opposition parties.

Macron now faces the daunting task of navigating a fragmented political landscape while maintaining public trust and advancing his legislative priorities. The coming days, particularly the appointment of a new prime minister and the passage of the budget, will be pivotal in determining the trajectory of his presidency.

Pope Francis Highlights Interreligious Dialogue Inspired by Sree Narayana Guru’s Legacy

The practice of interreligious dialogue has deep roots in Asia, as demonstrated once again on November 30 when Pope Francis welcomed participants of a significant meeting promoted by the Indian foundation Sree Narayana Guru to the Vatican. This foundation carries forward the vision of the influential Hindu leader Sree Narayana Guru, who, over a century ago, initiated the gathering of diverse religious representatives at his ashram in India. The landmark conference, first organized in 1923 during a period of severe religious tension in Kerala, has since become an annual tradition. To commemorate the centenary of this initiative, the meeting was brought to the Vatican in collaboration with the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue.

This event served as a moment to reflect on the remarkable life of Sree Narayana Guru (1856–1928), a revered Hindu figure who devoted himself to the fight against caste discrimination. In 1925, Mahatma Gandhi visited Guru’s ashram and was deeply moved by its inclusive environment, where Dalit children studied sacred texts like the Upanishads alongside others. Inspired by this experience, Gandhi integrated caste reform into his political ideology.

During his address to the interreligious assembly, Pope Francis praised the profound relevance of Sree Narayana Guru’s principles to contemporary global challenges. “Sree Narayana Guru,” he stated, “dedicated his life to promoting social and religious redemption with his clear message that all human beings, regardless of their ethnicity or religious and cultural traditions, are members of the one human family.” The Pope underscored Guru’s insistence on eliminating all forms of discrimination, a stance he deemed especially vital in a world increasingly plagued by intolerance and hatred.

The Pope elaborated on the widespread suffering caused by ethnic, social, racial, linguistic, and religious prejudices, particularly among marginalized and vulnerable populations. He emphasized the pressing need to combat these divides, stating, “His message is very apt for our world today, where we see increasing instances of intolerance and hatred between peoples and nations. Unfortunately, manifestations of discrimination and exclusion, tensions and violence… are a daily experience for many people and communities, especially among the poor, the defenceless, and those who have no voice.”

Pope Francis drew parallels between Sree Narayana Guru’s ideals and two significant interfaith documents he has championed: the Abu Dhabi Document of 2019 and the Istiqlal Declaration, signed during his visit to Indonesia in September 2023. Both agreements emphasize the importance of fraternity in interreligious dialogue, a theme that resonates with Guru’s teachings.

“All religions,” the Pope remarked, “teach the fundamental truth that, as children of the one God, we must love and honour one another, respect diversity and differences in a spirit of fraternity and inclusion, taking care of one another and of the earth, our common home.” He cautioned against ignoring these noble teachings, suggesting that such neglect contributes to the world’s current instability.

In urging a renewed commitment to living out the values espoused by religious traditions, Pope Francis highlighted the transformative power of fostering fraternal and amicable relations. He stressed the necessity of unity in diversity and harmonious coexistence, emphasizing the role of peacemaking amid today’s challenges. “Our contemporaries,” he said, “will rediscover the value of the lofty teachings of religious traditions only if we all strive to live them and to cultivate fraternal and friendly relations with all, for the sole purpose of strengthening unity in diversity, ensuring harmonious coexistence among differences and being peacemakers, despite the difficulties and challenges we face.”

Concluding his address, the Pope called for a collective effort to counteract harmful societal trends such as individualism, exclusion, indifference, and violence. “In this way,” he stated, “we can contribute to defeating the culture of individualism, exclusion, indifference, and violence that is unfortunately spreading.”

The commemoration of Sree Narayana Guru’s work at the Vatican symbolizes the enduring significance of his vision for interreligious harmony. It also reflects Pope Francis’s commitment to fostering dialogue and fraternity among religions in pursuit of a more united and compassionate world.

Why ‘Pur’ Appears in the Names of Indian Cities

India, the world’s largest democracy, is a country of immense diversity and cultural richness. It comprises 28 states and 8 union territories, encompassing a total of 797 districts—752 in states and 45 in union territories. Within these districts lie numerous cities, each marked by its unique history, culture, and heritage. Many of these cities, rich in centuries-old traditions, bear names that narrate their stories.

A common feature observed in the names of many Indian cities and villages is the suffix “Pur.” Examples include Jaipur, Udaipur, Raipur, Saharanpur, Nagpur, Mubarakpur, Sultanpur, Gorakhpur, Jaunpur, Kanpur, and Rampur. But why is this word so prevalent in the names of places across India? What is the origin of “Pur,” and what does it signify? Let us delve into the fascinating story behind this suffix.

The Origin of “Pur” in Place Names

The tradition of adding “Pur” to place names dates back to ancient times. Often used at the end of a name, it was typically introduced by kings and emperors who sought to immortalize their legacy. One prominent example is the city of Jaipur, named after Raja Jai Singh, who appended “Pur” to his name to form the city’s name.

What Does “Pur” Mean?

The meaning of “Pur” can be traced to its mention in the Rigveda, one of the oldest known scriptures. Derived from Sanskrit, “Pur” translates to “city” or “fort.” Historically, the term symbolized the fortified cities or strongholds ruled by kings and emperors. In naming their cities, rulers often combined the word “Pur” with their names or the names of significant elements in their kingdoms, thus creating unique identities for these places.

For instance, a particular name or feature was placed before “Pur,” signifying ownership or association with the king. This practice effectively tied the name of the city to the ruler, reinforcing their authority and legacy. Over time, these names became deeply ingrained in history and culture, preserving the memory of their founders.

A Broader Usage of “Pur”

Interestingly, the usage of “Pur” is not limited to India. According to some linguistic experts, the term is also found in Arabic. This linguistic crossover explains the presence of “Pur” in the names of certain cities in Afghanistan and Iran. The cultural and linguistic exchanges between regions over centuries likely contributed to this shared tradition.

The legacy of “Pur” in Indian place names continues to resonate with the country’s rich heritage. Whether denoting a king’s city, a fort, or simply a place with a unique history, the suffix reflects the enduring influence of ancient traditions on modern geography.

Modi and Biden Strengthen U.S.-India Partnership for a Global Future

In a pivotal bilateral meeting, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Joe Biden reaffirmed their commitment to advancing the U.S.-India Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership. Hailed as the defining partnership of the 21st century, both leaders emphasized its importance in shaping a prosperous and secure future for the global community.

The meeting addressed crucial global and regional issues, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. President Biden praised India’s leadership on the world stage, notably through its role in the G-20 and Global South initiatives. Modi’s historic visits to Poland and Ukraine were also acknowledged as a demonstration of India’s growing global influence.

Both leaders celebrated the success of the Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology (iCET), which has expanded strategic cooperation across sectors like space, semiconductors, and advanced telecommunications. They reviewed progress on the “Innovation Handshake” agenda, a collaboration between the U.S. Commerce Department and India’s Ministry of Commerce to foster innovation ecosystems in both countries.

In the defense sector, ongoing projects were recognized, particularly in co-production of jet engines, munitions, and mobility systems. They also lauded the Security of Supply Arrangement (SOSA), aimed at ensuring a steady mutual supply of defense goods and services.

To promote clean energy, the leaders launched a program under the U.S.-India Roadmap to Build Safe and Secure Global Clean Energy Supply Chains. This initiative will accelerate the production and supply of clean energy technologies in both nations, enhancing sustainability efforts.

India’s signing of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) was another highlight, marking a commitment to advancing resilience, sustainability, and economic growth across the region.

The leaders concluded by reviewing agreements in sectors like trade, business, healthcare, and agriculture, underscoring that the U.S.-India partnership is vital for a cleaner, inclusive, and secure global future. Their joint statement expressed confidence that this partnership will continue to reach new heights in the years to come.

-+=