Green Card Holders Affected by Trump’s Immigration Bill

July 8, 2025July 16, 2025 Staff ReporterHealth, Immigration, Politics 0

The One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB), signed into law by President Donald Trump, is set to significantly impact green card holders and legal immigrants by restricting access to some health benefits and imposing new taxes on overseas remittances.

President Donald Trump’s recently signed One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) introduces measures that could heavily impact legally present immigrants, including those holding green cards, by changing how they access certain health benefits and imposing a new tax on money sent abroad.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the OBBB will lead to 11.8 million more Americans being uninsured by 2034 and will increase the federal deficit by almost $3.3 trillion over the next decade. This legislation could result in 1.3 million lawfully present immigrants losing their health insurance by 2034, according to the CBO. Trump signed the bill into law on July 4.

Under current U.S. policy, lawful permanent residents, refugees, survivors of domestic violence, and individuals on valid work or student visas can purchase insurance through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace. Many of these groups qualify for federal tax credits that help reduce monthly insurance premiums, while others may be eligible for Medicaid or Medicare, based on income and other criteria.

The OBBB, however, intends to limit access to these benefits. It may prevent some lawfully present immigrants from benefiting from federal health insurance subsidies. Immigrants most affected could include low-income green card holders still within the five-year waiting period for Medicaid along with refugees and survivors of domestic violence, who may face a loss of subsidized health insurance.

If the bill is fully enacted, only green card holders, select individuals from Cuba and Haiti, and some Pacific Island communities would continue to receive federal benefits. Most immigrant groups, regardless of legal status, could lose access to affordable healthcare options.

Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies at the Cato Institute, commented on the bill, noting that immigrants consume fewer government-supplied health benefits compared to native-born Americans. Nowrasteh views the bill as a start to widen this gap, suggesting it could benefit taxpayers without adversely affecting the health of excluded non-citizens.

In addition to healthcare changes, the OBBB will introduce a 1 percent tax on remittances sent overseas, impacting millions of immigrant families who send financial support to relatives in their home countries. Supporters of the measure argue it could generate significant federal revenue, but critics point out it places a financial strain on low to middle-income workers reliant on these remittances to support their families abroad.

The legislation also allocates significant funds to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), including $45 billion to expand detention capacities to nearly 100,000 beds, $14 billion for transportation and deportations, and $8 billion for hiring 10,000 additional deportation officers.

Veronique de Rugy, a Senior Research Fellow with the Mercatus Center, highlighted the economic implications of the tax on remittances, explaining that it effectively reduces household income, potentially pushing families back into poverty and damaging local economies.

Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, emphasized that the OBBB aims to protect vulnerable Americans by eliminating waste and fraud in Medicaid and fulfilling President Trump’s campaign promise to strengthen border security and deport criminal illegal aliens.

Conversely, John Slocum, Executive Director of Refugee Council USA, expressed concerns about the bill’s potential to reverse decades of bipartisan support for newcomer integration. He warned that refugees and immigrant families could face significant hardships, impacting their recovery and integration into U.S. communities.

The OBBB’s enactment might result in hundreds of thousands of lawfully present immigrants, including asylum seekers, trafficking survivors, and refugees, losing access to ACA marketplace coverage, with the elimination of subsidies that help make healthcare premiums more affordable.

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty: A Visionary Leader with Over Two Decades of Dedicated Service to AAPI, Poised to Propel the Organization to New Heights

July 7, 2025July 8, 2025 Ajay GhoshCommunity, Health 0

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty: A Visionary Leader with Over Two Decades of Dedicated Service to AAPI, Poised to Propel the Organization to New Heights

“Unity is our strength—collaborating and presenting a united front is the challenge I am determined to overcome.”

“AAPI is the only organization in the United States that truly represents physicians of Indian origin,” says Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, who assumed office as the President of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) during a historic oath-taking ceremony at AAPI’s national headquarters on July 3, 2025. The ceremonial gavel transfer will follow later this month at AAPI’s 43rd Annual Convention in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty’s Vision to Unite AAPI: Bridging Divides and Building Trust

“We have the potential to make a significant impact on the healthcare landscape of this country,” Dr. Chakrabarty asserts. “My goal this year is to unify AAPI by transcending the regional divides that have hindered our progress in recent years. Indian American physicians represent tremendous talent and potential, and the key to realizing that lies in collective action and a united voice—something I am committed to fostering.”

As he steps into this leadership role, Dr. Chakrabarty pledges to work toward strengthening and expanding AAPI, which represents the interests of over 120,000 Indian American physicians. The Alabama-based urologist envisions a future where AAPI becomes “more vibrant, united, transparent, and politically active,” with increased membership and a stronger presence among younger physicians. He emphasizes the importance of ensuring that “AAPI’s voice is heard in the corridors of power.”

Dr. Chakrabarty’s journey with AAPI spans more than two decades—from a devoted “foot soldier” since 1997 to now leading the largest ethnic medical organization in the U.S. He refers to AAPI as his “second family,” a community he deeply cherishes and is honored to serve.

“Since joining AAPI as a patron member in 1997, I have dedicated myself to its mission,” says Dr. Chakrabarty, Consultant Urologist at Urologic Clinics of North Florida, former Chairman of the Urologic Clinics of North Alabama, and Director of the Center for Continence and Female Pelvic Health. “As the President, I will lead from the front. If members see my dedication, hard work, and transparency, I hope they will stand with me and help make this a successful year for AAPI.”

On his plans to unify AAPI, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, a Bengali born and raised in Odisha, expresses both optimism and determination. “I have the unique advantage of having earned the trust of many regional groups within AAPI—especially those that have been at odds in recent years,” he says. “My history of honest, transparent leadership and my ability to reach across the aisle give me hope that I can help build bridges and strengthen AAPI’s unity and foundation.”

A Gandhian at heart, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty firmly embraces the timeless principle of “Satyameva Jayate” — Truth alone triumphs. Reflecting on his journey, he shares,
“I am a Bengali from Odisha, and I have lived and served in smaller AAPI chapters like Alabama and Missouri. I have no particular state or chapter allegiance; instead, I take pride in bridging divides and forging friendships across all regions and backgrounds, a trait that brought me to the pinnacle of this esteemed organization. My circle includes friends from every corner of AAPI and beyond, and I actively participate in diverse ethnic festivities, as my friends in Huntsville can certainly attest.”

A recipient of the National AAPI Distinguished Service Award (2018) and the President’s Award for Services (2019) from the Indian American Urological Society, Dr. Chakrabarty considers leadership both as a passion and a strength. “I see myself as a motivator. I lead by example, and that energy tends to inspire others. I’m fun-loving by nature, and I’ve always chosen to push through challenges rather than let them define me.”

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty – AAPI Champion and Tireless Leader

Since joining AAPI, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty has been a steadfast leader and advocate, serving the organization with unwavering dedication for over 25 years. A Patron Member and long-standing Governing Body Member, he has impacted nearly every aspect of AAPI without bias or personal agenda.

He served two terms as Regional Director (2004–2006), was a Trustee (2017–2020), and chaired or co-chaired key committees including Ethics & Grievances, Journal Resources, Website, Alumni, Membership, Bylaws, IT, and the Charitable Foundation—helping expand its free clinic reach in the U.S. and India.

At the chapter level, Dr. Chakrabarty revitalized both the Alabama and St. Louis chapters, leading them from dormancy to becoming two of AAPI’s most active branches. Under his leadership, Alabama produced 13 of the last 15 Regional Directors, while St. Louis hosted a record-setting Governing Body Meeting, attended by the largest number of past presidents and BOT chairs. He holds the rare distinction of conducting three AAPI Governing Body meetings—two in Alabama and one in St. Louis.

He has also helmed specialty organizations, including the Indian American Urological Association and the Society of Indian American Clinical Urologists, and has played key roles at AAPI’s Global Health Summits in Odisha, Kolkata, and Hyderabad. To date, he has attended over 100 AAPI events worldwide.

Beyond AAPI, Dr. Chakrabarty has led cultural and community organizations across Alabama and at present serves as the Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Hindu Cultural Center of Huntsville. He led the Indian Delegation to Japan in 1985, the International Youth Year, on the invitation of the Government of Japan. From negotiating stipends for medical residents in Delhi as the President of the Resident Doctors’ Association, to shaping the future of Indian American physicians, his leadership spans continents and generations.

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty’s Vision: Shaping the Future of AAPI

As he takes the helm of AAPI—one of the most respected and enduring ethnic physician organizations in the United States—Dr. Amit Chakrabarty has laid out a bold and forward-thinking agenda for the organization’s future. His vision focuses on advocacy, global engagement, and empowering the next generation of physicians. Key priorities include:

Combating Physician Burnout and Addressing the Green Card Backlog:
Dr. Chakrabarty is committed to advocating for meaningful reforms to alleviate the growing crisis of physician burnout and tackling the long-standing immigration hurdles, especially the Green Card backlog, that disproportionately affect Indian-origin doctors.
Establishing a Robust and Well-Funded Political Action Committee (PAC):
Recognizing the power of political advocacy, he plans to build a strong and strategically funded AAPI-PAC to effectively lobby for physician-related policy changes and increase the organization’s influence at the state and national levels.
Global Partnerships in Healthcare Education:
Dr. Chakrabarty envisions AAPI as a global leader in medical education and innovation, promoting collaborations with international institutions to advance healthcare standards, training, and access across borders.
Participation in Global Health Policy-Making:
AAPI, under his leadership, will seek a greater voice in shaping healthcare policies within global institutions such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations, particularly on issues affecting South and Southeast Asia.
Investing in the Future: Empowering Medical Students, Residents, and Young Physicians (MSR/YPS):
Emphasizing the need for generational continuity, Dr. Chakrabarty aims to heavily invest in the MSR/YPS section, offering them leadership roles within mainstream AAPI and integrating them into all levels of organizational planning and programming.
“Without the active involvement of our young physicians, there will be no AAPI 20 years from now,” he warns. “We must cultivate their leadership now and give them the platform to shape the organization’s future.”

AAPI’s Financial Future: Dr. Chakrabarty’s Vision in Action

Ensuring AAPI’s financial strength is a top priority for Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, who brings over 20 years of hands-on fundraising success to the table.

“Fundraising is my passion,” he says. “I’ve consistently raised funds for AAPI and causes we care deeply about.”

A few highlights of his efforts include:

Leading the 9-city Talat Aziz Tour for Hurricane Harvey relief & Leukemia Society
Organizing the Pankaj Udhas Show supporting AAPI scholarships and childhood obesity awareness
Organizing and conducting Geetanjali Music benefit concert for Puerto Rico hurricane relief
Helped with Sukhwinder Singh Tour (2022), Shreya Ghosal Show (2018), Hema Malini Concert (2003 and 2004)
$100,000 scholarship fund for Indian urologists through the Indian American Urology Association
Geetanjali music concert raised over $600,000+ in two successive years for the Hindu Temple of St. Louis
Multiple fundraisers to eliminate a $1.3 million debt for the Hindu Cultural Center of North Alabama

Many of these events were initiated, funded, and organized personally by Dr. Chakrabarty—including his original concept “DADA vs DADA”, a tour planned to benefit the AAPI Charitable Foundation in 2005, which was later on, canceled due to Hurricane Katrina.

“Philanthropy has been part of my life since childhood,” he says, citing school fundraisers and musical performances as early outlets for his service spirit. That passion continues today through his work with his own musical group Geetanjali Music, which has headlined numerous AAPI benefit events.

Investing in the Future: Empowering Young Physicians

Equally crucial to Dr. Chakrabarty is the active inclusion and empowerment of AAPI’s younger members, particularly the Medical Students, Residents, Fellows (MSRF), and Young Physicians (YPS) section. “If we don’t actively engage our young physicians today, AAPI risks becoming irrelevant in the next two decades,” he cautions.

He strongly advocates for giving MSR/YPS greater visibility and leadership roles within the organization, beginning with the national convention.

“One of the prime-time evening sessions at the main convention should be entirely managed and led by the YPS team. It will not only boost their confidence but also reinforce their connection to the parent organization,” he suggests.

Through strategic fundraising and empowering the next generation, Dr. Chakrabarty envisions an AAPI that is not only financially secure, but also vibrant, inclusive, and future-ready.

Advancing AAPI as a Global Health Leader

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty envisions a future where AAPI stands as a globally respected, politically empowered, and socially impactful force in healthcare. His international vision includes:

Strengthening global health education partnerships
Delivering economic and material aid to underserved communities
Securing
AAPI’s seat at the policy table of WHO and the UN, particularly on South Asian health issues

“My goal is for AAPI to be recognized as a global health leader,” he affirms. He plans to revitalize AAPI’s philanthropic efforts through greater visibility and accountability.

“The AAPI Charitable Foundation has done vital work over the last 20 years in supporting free clinics in India—but we must better support and showcase our philanthropic efforts,” he says.

To expand AAPI’s global footprint, Dr. Chakrabarty proposes creating an AAPI Global Foundation—focused on innovation, research, education, and health policy—while the AAPI Charitable Foundation continues to provide direct clinical care in India. Together, these arms will drive AAPI’s mission of improving healthcare locally and worldwide.

Leading by Action: “Help India Breathe”

During the COVID-19 crisis, Dr. Chakrabarty launched Help India Breathe under his ApShiNi Ventures initiative—delivering critical aid when it was needed most. While national organizations like AAPI relied on government distribution, Dr. Chakrabarty independently ensured life-saving equipment reached underserved hospitals and small clinics across India.

“ApShiNi directly supported nonprofit and remote hospitals and clinics—where the need was greatest,” he explains. Thanks to rigorous coordination, ApShiNi volunteers delivered nearly 2,400 co-ventilators and 1500 high-capacity oxygen concentrators to these remote areas and also frontline defense outposts. (www.apshini.org)

Dr. Chakrabarty also served as the founding president of the Odisha Doctors’ International Association (ODIA), leading unified efforts to provide medical aid and amplify Odisha’s healthcare needs globally. He continues to represent Odisha in AAPI’s national leadership.

Dr. Chakrabarty – A Multi-Talented Leader

Physician, performer, and passionate visionary, Dr. Chakrabarty is as much an artist as a healer. He founded AAPI’s Got Talent (2010) and the beloved Mehfil segment (2008), bringing music, laughter, and community to AAPI’s annual conventions.

Chair of the AAPI Entertainment Committee and a founding member of the Geetanjali Music Group, he has helped raise funds through music while sharing the stage with his talented daughter and nephew (www.geetanjalimusic.com)

Driven by joy and resilience, he says, “I love people and celebrating life… if life gives me lemons, I make lemonade!” His passions also extend to stand-up comedy, cricket, travel, and outdoor cooking—reflecting a vibrant spirit deeply connected to culture and community.

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty – A Scholar, Surgeon, and Innovator

Board-certified urologist and Chairman of the Urologic Clinics of North Florida, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty has practiced adult and pediatric urology across three continents for over 30 years. He also leads the Center for Continence and Female Pelvic Health and serves as primary investigator at UCNA Research.

A top graduate of MKCG Medical College in India, Dr. Chakrabarty earned multiple gold medals and the Pfizer Medallion for academic excellence. He completed his Master of Surgery at PGIMER Chandigarh, followed by a surgical fellowship at the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh—mirroring the path of his father, a pioneering surgeon in Odisha. After moving to the U.S., he completed a urology residency and uro-oncology fellowship at Wayne State University.

Dr. Chakrabarty’s clinical focus includes female urology, urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, BPH, and male hypogonadism. He is a surgical proctor and global speaker on cutting-edge treatments, and has published widely on urinary health and hormonal disorders. His research helped lead to FDA approval of Vibregon, a treatment for overactive bladder.

As an educator, he remains an active contributor to AAPI CME programs. His passion for learning and teaching is deeply rooted in the example set by his father. Dr. Chakrabarty has mentored students at several institutions and has authored multiple medical publications. He regularly contributes to AAPI’s CME programs and workshops, and has been awarded membership to the AAPI Distinguished speakers’ Club.

A physician known for his compassion, brilliance, and unwavering dedication, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty has consistently excelled in every role he has undertaken—both within the medical community and in public service. His leadership is not only defined by professional excellence, but also by a deep commitment to humanitarian causes, education, and global health equity.

With confidence born of extensive experience, Dr. Chakrabarty states, “Having served as a member and leader of AAPI for over two decades, I have honed the skills necessary to advance the organization. My mission is to leave a legacy of work that people will remember fondly and proudly long after I am gone.”

Family Support

Dr. Chakrabarty credits his success to his wife of 38 years and their three daughters. His eldest, a breast oncology surgeon and AAPI-MSRF member, also shares his musical and philanthropic spirit. “My family has stood by me through every step,” he says. “This year, I’m committed to giving back even more to AAPI—and leaving a legacy that honors both my parents and my journey.”

About AAPI

The influence of physicians of Indian heritage continues to grow significantly across the United States. Increasingly, physicians of Indian origin occupy critical roles in healthcare delivery, academia, research, and administration nationwide. As physicians of Indian origin, we take immense pride in our remarkable achievements and contributions—to our motherland India, our adopted home the United States, and in fostering the transformative Indo-US relationship.

Representing one in every seven patients in the U.S., AAPI members care for millions of individuals daily. Many have risen to prominent leadership positions, shaping policies, programs, and innovations that impact healthcare both nationally and globally.

“Since its founding in 1982, AAPI has been at the forefront, uniting more than 125,000 practicing physicians across the country to serve as the collective voice of Indian-origin physicians,” said Dr. Satheesh Kathula. “We remain committed to this noble mission and will continue strengthening our efforts to propel AAPI to even greater heights.”

Among AAPI’s standout leaders is Dr. Amit Chakrabarty—respected for his clinical excellence, humanitarian work, and commitment to global health equity. “With over two decades in AAPI leadership, I aim to leave a legacy that inspires pride and lasting impact,” says Dr. Chakrabarty. For more information, please visit www.amitforaapi.com

Musk Plans New Political Party After Trump Tax Dispute

July 7, 2025July 16, 2025 Staff ReporterPolitics 0

Elon Musk announced the formation of the America Party following a split with President Donald Trump over the president’s new tax cuts law, marking a potential shift in the political landscape.

BRIDGEWATER, N.J. — Elon Musk has made good on a previous declaration to establish a new political party, revealing the launch of the America Party in response to President Donald Trump’s recently enacted tax cuts law. This move comes as Musk distances himself from Trump, with whom he previously had close political ties.

Musk’s departure from the Republican president’s support was initiated by dissatisfaction with the tax legislation, which Trump signed on Friday. The bill’s approval by Congress prompted Musk to threaten the creation of the “America Party,” expressing his concern about excessive government spending.

“When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,” Musk stated on X, the social media platform he owns. “Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.”

On Sunday, as Musk prepared to leave his New Jersey residence for a return to Washington, Trump addressed the media regarding Musk’s new party, dismissing the idea as “ridiculous.” Trump highlighted the Republican Party’s significant achievements, while also suggesting that third parties historically introduce confusion.

While new political parties are not uncommon in the U.S., they often struggle to draw substantial support away from the major Republican and Democratic parties. However, Musk, being the world’s richest individual, has the potential to influence the 2026 congressional elections if he chooses to allocate substantial financial resources to the America Party. Musk has previously invested at least $250 million backing Trump in the 2024 election.

The renewed discord with Trump could have significant ramifications for Musk, as several of his business enterprises, including Tesla, benefit from substantial government contracts. The lack of clarity regarding the formal establishment of the America Party remains, as spokespeople for Musk and his political action committee, America PAC, have not commented.

Notably, several political entities listed in the Federal Election Commission database appeared after Musk’s announcement on Saturday, including variations of “America Party” names or affiliations with Musk. However, many were not legitimate, with contact information appearing as unverifiable addresses.

Moreover, on Sunday morning, Musk engaged users on X, gathering insights on the America Party and indicating plans to participate in the 2026 midterm elections. Last month, Musk expressed intentions to challenge every congressional member who supported Trump’s tax legislation, criticizing it as a “disgusting abomination.”

His critique extended to the expanded federal deficit and criticized the Republican Party, which controls the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, for enlarging the government and national debt by five trillion dollars.

Musk’s decision to form a political party reflects a significant change from his stance in May when he indicated an intention to reduce political engagement as his tenure in the White House closed.

Scott Bessent, Treasury Secretary, and former Doge boss, acknowledged on CNN’s “State of the Union” that Musk’s principles resonated with some, but noted polling suggested Musk himself was not popular. “I imagine that those board of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities,” Bessent remarked.

Source: Original article

Texas Floods Prompt Debate on Impact of Job Cuts in Forecasting

July 7, 2025July 16, 2025 Staff ReporterEnvironment, Nation, Politics 0

Following torrential rains and flash floods in Texas Hill Country, President Trump’s staffing cuts to the National Weather Service (NWS) are under scrutiny, with critics raising concerns about the impact on disaster preparedness and response.

The National Weather Service (NWS) is facing criticism in the wake of a catastrophic weather event that claimed the lives of at least 80 people in Texas, with a significant number being young girls and counselors at a summer camp along the Guadalupe River. Torrential downpours and sudden floodwaters ravaged the Texas Hill Country on Friday night, prompting questions about the adequacy of weather forecasting and warnings provided during the disaster.

The weather event has brought attention to staffing reductions within the NWS, with former federal officials and experts having previously warned that President Donald Trump’s significant cuts to the agency could jeopardize public safety. Despite these concerns, the majority of officials in the Republican-dominated state have refrained from directly attributing the tragic outcomes to the staffing cuts.

As the thunderstorms intensified Thursday night, five staff members were on duty at the NWS office responsible for the affected region—consistent with the number typically available during expected severe weather conditions. Defending the agency’s efforts, current and former NWS officials highlighted the timely issuance of urgent flash flood warnings, including a catastrophic flash flood warning issued before the river rose significantly.

“This was an exceptional service to come out first with the catastrophic flash flood warning and this shows the awareness of the meteorologists on shift at the NWS office,” stated Brian LaMarre, who retired in April as the meteorologist-in-charge at the NWS forecast office in Tampa, Florida. LaMarre noted the challenges in precisely predicting extreme weather but commended the urgent response provided by the meteorologists.

Despite the timely warnings, concerns remain about the level of coordination between the NWS and local officials during the night of the disaster. The Trump administration’s downsizing initiative has reduced staffing by at least 20% at nearly half of the 122 NWS field offices across the country, and several offices no longer maintain around-the-clock staff. In addition, numerous forecasters and senior managers were prompted to retire early.

The Trump administration has also proposed a 27% reduction in the budget for the NWS’s parent agency, potentially affecting research centers dedicated to weather, climate, and ocean studies. In the Austin/San Antonio office, which oversees the severely impacted Kerr County, six of 27 positions remain unfilled. This includes a pivotal management role responsible for coordinating emergency responses with local officials, left vacant following the former employee’s departure in April after mass retirement encouragements.

In response to the devastating incident, Democratic leaders have demanded clarity on the staffing changes. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer pressed the Trump administration for an investigation into the possible contribution of staffing shortages to the “catastrophic loss of life” in the area.

President Trump, addressing the situation, stated that the reduction in jobs did not impair weather forecasting capabilities. He described the sudden floods as an unforeseen event, stating, “The raging waters were a thing that happened in seconds. No one expected it. Nobody saw it.”

According to AP News, despite the debate over staffing and preparedness, the tragic events have highlighted the need for comprehensive review and potential restructuring to ensure effective warning and response mechanisms in future disasters.

Source: Original article

Indian Applicants Face US Visa Appointment Challenges Despite Consulate Interviews

July 7, 2025July 16, 2025 Staff ReporterPolitics, Visa 0

Since the U.S. consulates in India resumed F-1 student visa interviews, applicants still face chaos, with scarce appointments and growing uncertainty threatening their educational plans.

Despite the resumption of F-1 student visa interviews at U.S. consulates in India on June 26, students continue to struggle with securing appointments, leading to significant anxiety and uncertainty.

As students prepare for the start of their courses in August, they face the challenge of obtaining visa appointments in a timely manner. The lack of available slots, coupled with the increase in 221(g) administrative processing notices, is jeopardizing their plans and investments.

LaunchEd co-founder Kajal Dave described the situation as “a mess,” pointing out that many students who have already paid tuition, booked flights, and found housing are unable to secure visa appointments. The financial implications are severe, with potential losses estimated to range between ₹12 and ₹35 lakh, covering tuition fees, housing deposits, and airfare if students cannot travel in time and their universities do not permit deferrals.

One student expressed their frustration and panic online, stating that visa slots in India have not been opened, leaving them feeling lost and hopeless as their course is set to begin on August 20.

Another student shared a similar concern, saying their university recommended deferring enrollment to the next fall due to these issues. The additional concern of receiving a 221(g) notice after securing an interview adds further uncertainty, as visa approvals remain on indefinite hold.

The U.S. Embassy website has recently cautioned that student or exchange visitor visa applicants without existing appointments may not be able to schedule an interview this summer, amplifying students’ worries.

This situation follows a month-long visa freeze from May 27 to June 26, hitting the peak student season and compounding broader systematic issues. According to a report by Business Standard, these challenges stem from a substantial backlog and an evolving adjudication policy, with increased scrutiny over digital footprints and social media causing further delays.

Currently, the wait time for appointments in India averages 45 to 60 days, with Kolkata experiencing the longest delays. As a result, many students are missing important university start dates.

Experts recommend that students facing these challenges can apply for emergency appointments through UStraveldocs or consult with their university’s Designated School Official (DSO) regarding deferral or temporary online study options. Ensuring that Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) and I-20 documents are up to date is also crucial if deferring is necessary.

The root of the current slot shortage combines the aforementioned visa freeze during a critical period and stricter visa vetting processes implemented in recent years. While students may request emergency appointments via the official UStraveldocs website, they must provide appropriate university documentation to support their application.

The U.S. Embassy has not confirmed if additional bulk slot openings will occur before the August 2025 intake, leaving students uncertain about future opportunities to secure their visas in time.

According to Business Standard

Source: Original article

Pope Leo XIV Approves Eco-Friendly Mass Initiative

July 7, 2025July 16, 2025 Staff ReporterEnvironment, Religion, Religion/Culture 0

Pope Leo XIV has approved a new Mass emphasizing environmental stewardship, amid Europe’s ongoing heat waves and wildfires.

As Europe faces unprecedented heatwaves, resulting in soaring temperatures, wildfires, and fatalities, the Vatican took a significant step toward environmental consciousness by unveiling a new liturgy for Mass on Thursday. This revised Mass specifically addresses the church’s responsibility to protect the planet, incorporating prayers, readings, and hymns aligned with this mission.

During a press conference, Cardinal Michael Czerny, who leads the Vatican’s Dicastery for Integral Human Development, expressed that the new Mass “can be used to ask God for the ability to care for creation.”

The Mass, titled Pro Custodia Creationis (For the Care of Creation), was initially conceptualized by Pope Francis, who consistently emphasized ecological responsibility throughout his papacy, notably in his 2015 encyclical, “Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home.” Pope Leo XIV appears poised to continue this focus on the environment, marking a continuity with his predecessors’ social concerns. He plans to privately celebrate the new Mass at Borgo Laudato Si’, an ecologically-minded village project initiated by Francis, located within the gardens of the papal summer residence at Castel Gandolfo, on Wednesday.

The new Mass will join the list of 17 existing Masses dedicated to specific civil needs, such as those for the harvest, rain, and migration, drawing inspiration from Francis’ “green” encyclical, which marks its 10th anniversary this year.

A collaborative effort between the Dicastery for Integral Human Development and the Dicastery for Divine Worship, the Mass is inspired by St. John Paul II’s 1990 World Day of Peace message that highlighted the relationship between humanity and the environment. Cardinal Czerny noted, “In a world where the most vulnerable of our brothers and sisters are the first to suffer the devastating effects of climate change, deforestation, and pollution, care for creation becomes an expression of our faith and humanity.”

Monsignor Vittorio Francesco Viola, the secretary of the Vatican’s liturgical department, explained that the Mass begins with an entrance antiphon that themed around “the glory of God” as revealed through creation. This liturgical celebration reaches its pinnacle during the Eucharist, concluding with a post-Communion prayer reflecting humanity’s intrinsic connection to God, neighbors, and the Earth—a relationship disrupted by sin, as discussed in “Laudato Si’.”

In this Mass, readings from the Gospel of Matthew illustrate God’s care for “the lilies of the field and the birds of the air,” and recount Jesus calming the storm, emphasizing believers’ responsibility to safeguard the environment. These readings challenge interpretations of Genesis that support human dominion over nature for personal gain.

Cardinal Czerny remarked, “This Mass is a reason for joy,” adding that it “calls us to be faithful stewards of what God has entrusted to us—not only in daily choices and public policies but also in our prayer, our worship, and our way of living in the world.”

The unveiling of Pro Custodia Creationis underscores the Vatican’s commitment to integrating environmental stewardship into religious practice, spotlighting the interconnection between spirituality and ecological responsibility.

According to Religion News Service, this initiative reflects the Vatican’s acknowledgment of the pressing need for faith communities to actively engage in promoting environmental care.

Tesla CFO Taneja Appointed Treasurer of Musk’s Political Party

July 7, 2025July 16, 2025 Staff ReporterPolitics, Business 0

Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja has been appointed as treasurer of the newly established America Party, founded by Elon Musk in response to recent political developments.

Tesla’s Chief Financial Officer Vaibhav Taneja, originally from India, has been named treasurer of Elon Musk’s America Party, according to documents filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC). This appointment comes as a part of Musk’s political initiative launched in early July following his disagreement with President Donald Trump over the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’.

The FEC filing reveals that the headquarters of the America Party is located at 1 Rocker Road in Hawthorne, California. Taneja’s responsibilities within the party encompass the roles of both treasurer and custodian of records, with his Tesla-affiliated address appearing in the official paperwork, which has since been circulating on social media.

The inception of the America Party was officially announced by Musk shortly after Trump enacted the controversial bill. Reflecting Musk’s proactive approach to political engagement, he posted on the platform X, formerly known as Twitter, stating, “By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.” As of now, Musk remains the party’s sole declared candidate.

In his new role as treasurer, Taneja will be in charge of the party’s financial oversight. His duties involve managing contributions, monitoring expenditures, and ensuring adherence to federal campaign finance regulations. This critical role requires him to maintain meticulous records of all financial transactions and prevent any illicit financial activities.

Vaibhav Taneja assumed the role of CFO at Tesla in August 2023, succeeding Zach Kirkhorn. Taneja possesses extensive expertise in corporate financial management, having joined Tesla in 2017 through its acquisition of SolarCity. Prior to becoming CFO, he served as Tesla’s Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller.

Before his association with Tesla, Taneja had a noteworthy career at PricewaterhouseCoopers spanning nearly 17 years, where he provided consultancy services to major corporations regarding financial strategy and regulatory compliance.

His appointment as treasurer of the America Party highlights his significant experience and trusted position within Musk’s ventures, as he takes on a pivotal role in navigating the financial dimensions of this newly formed political entity.

Trump’s Bill Reduces Remittance Tax for Indians to 1%

July 7, 2025July 16, 2025 Staff ReporterNation, Economy, USA 0

President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act has advanced in the Senate, featuring a reduced 1% tax on remittances, offering relief to Indian professionals and non-resident Indians (NRIs) in the U.S.

In a significant development for Indian professionals and non-resident Indians (NRIs) in the United States, President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act has managed to surmount a major hurdle in the Senate, now offering a considerably lowered remittance tax of 1%. This development is seen as a substantial relief from the originally proposed 5% tax rate, which had initially drawn widespread concern.

The updated draft of the bill now implements a mere 1% tax on remittances sent via cash, money orders, or cashier’s checks. This marks a substantial reduction from the 5% rate proposed in May, which was later downscaled to 3.5% in the House version of the bill. The reduced tax rate applies to remittance transfers not made through financial institutions or using a debit or credit card issued in the United States.

The initial draft of the bill passed by the House of Representatives in May caused alarm among many Indian professionals due to its high proposed tax, affecting non-U.S. citizens, including those on Green Cards and temporary visas like H-1B and H-2A. Remittances comprise a significant component of India’s foreign income, making the tax rate particularly relevant for Indian nationals residing abroad.

Data from the Migration Policy Institute, as cited by The Times of India, indicated that approximately 2.9 million Indians were living in the U.S. as of 2023, making them the second-largest foreign-born demographic in the country. Additionally, the World Bank reported in 2024 that India was the largest recipient of international remittances, accumulating $129 billion, with 28% of these remittances originating from the U.S.

In light of these statistics, the remittance policy is pivotal for states like Kerala, Uttar Pradesh, and Bihar, where remittances are a crucial financial lifeline for millions of households.

Despite the remittance tax relief, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes contentious elements such as a $150 billion increase in military spending, mass deportation measures, and funding for a border wall. To offset these expenses, the bill proposes substantial cuts to federal programs, including Medicaid and incentives for clean energy, inciting opposition from various political factions, including divisions within the Republican Party itself.

This policy proposal has led to public disagreements, notably between President Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who lashed out at the bill as “utterly insane,” cautioning that it would jeopardize millions of American jobs.

The flag-bearing piece of legislation narrowly passed a Senate vote by 51-49, pushing it forward for further Senate discussions. According to Al Jazeera, President Trump aims to see the bill enacted by Congress before the Fourth of July.

Source: Original article

Americans4Hindus Urges FBI Probe into ISKCON Utah Gunfire Incidents

July 6, 2025July 8, 2025 Staff ReporterNation USA, Politics, Society 0

Americans4Hindus has expressed grave concern over recent gunfire incidents at the ISKCON Temple in Utah, which may be hate crimes targeting the Hindu community in the United States.

Americans4Hindus, an advocacy group, has raised alarms following nighttime gunfire occurrences at the ISKCON Temple in Utah. These incidents, suspected to be targeted attacks, underscore the vulnerability of Hindu places of worship and might be classified as hate crimes against the Hindu minority in the country.

In response to these unsettling events, the organization stands with the ISKCON community and commends the Utah County Sheriff’s Office. The local law enforcement agency has shown agility in dealing with the situation by increasing patrols to safeguard the temple and its worshippers.

Dr. Romesh Japra, the Founder and Chairman of Americans4Hindus, called for a comprehensive federal response. “Given the rising trend of temple vandalism and Hindu hate crimes—including acts of violence—we strongly urge the FBI to launch a thorough and transparent investigation. We call on FBI Director Kash Patel and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to ensure that such heinous incidents receive the appropriate federal attention and action,” he declared.

This call to action is part of the organization’s broader commitment to upholding the civil and religious rights of Hindu Americans, making sure that their sacred spaces are protected and respected nationwide.

The advocacy group has been a vocal supporter of safeguarding minority religious rights, pointing out the crucial need for vigilance and appropriate measures to deter hate crimes.

The original source reporting these concerns is Americans4Hindus, a prominent voice in advocating for Hindu Americans’ rights and interests.

Source: Original article

Banks and Telecom Surpass Tech in H-1B Visa Hiring

July 6, 2025July 8, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, Business 0

Major banks and telecommunications companies have surpassed technology giants as the leading recruiters of H-1B visa workers in recent years, reshaping the landscape of foreign talent employment in the United States.

From May 2020 to May 2024, significant players such as Citigroup, AT&T, and Capital One have emerged as top recruiters of foreign labor through staffing and outsourcing agencies, according to data analyzed by Bloomberg. This trend marks a notable shift from previous years, where technology firms in Silicon Valley dominated H-1B visa hiring.

The H-1B visa is crucial for U.S. companies requiring individuals for specialty occupations demanding theoretical or technical expertise. Fields actively engaging H-1B workers include information technology, engineering, finance, and healthcare.

Applicants must possess a job offer from a U.S. employer and hold at least a bachelor’s degree or its equivalent in their field to qualify for the visa. The initial grant is for up to three years and can be extended to a maximum of six. Each fiscal year, the U.S. government issues 65,000 H-1B visas with an additional 20,000 allotted to applicants with a U.S. master’s degree or higher.

The perpetual high demand for these visas has necessitated a lottery system. Employers are required to submit a Labor Condition Application to ensure fair wages and working conditions for their H-1B employees. This program remains critical for enabling U.S. businesses to leverage global talent and address skill shortages.

India has consistently emerged as a leading source of H-1B applicants. The country accounts for roughly 70–75% of all petitions due to its robust tech industry and close ties with U.S. technology firms. China follows as the second-largest contributor, contributing about 11–13% of applications. Other countries like Canada, South Korea, and the Philippines each represent under 1% of the total.

The global workforce distribution, particularly in IT, engineering, and healthcare, highlights how U.S. companies rely heavily on skilled professionals from these countries to meet their labor demands.

Bloomberg’s report reveals that Citigroup Inc. added over 3,000 new H-1B workers during this four-year span—surpassing prominent tech companies like Nvidia, Oracle, and Qualcomm. However, most of these hires are not direct employees but rather contractors through third-party firms. A significant portion came via outsourcing companies like Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (TCS), which is currently under investigation by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for possible discrimination against non-Indian workers.

In response to these allegations, a spokesperson for TCS stated, “Allegations that TCS engages in unlawful discrimination are meritless and misleading. TCS has a strong track record of being an equal opportunity employer in the US, embracing the highest levels of integrity and values in our operations.”

Citigroup also addressed questions about their hiring approach, saying, “We supplement our 71,000 US workers with highly skilled H-1B visa holders to address specific, timely needs. When we do so, we follow relevant laws and regulations, including anti-discrimination laws.”

Bloomberg’s analysis suggests that H-1B contractors receive significantly lower compensation than their direct counterparts. While software developers through staffing agencies reported median earnings of $94,000, those directly employed earned $142,000, even while factoring in job title, education, and experience.

The disparity in wages has drawn criticism concerning the program’s aim to recruit the highest caliber of professionals. “If the whole purpose of this program is to hire the best of the best, then why aren’t we seeing higher wages?” remarked Susan Houseman of the W.E. Upjohn Institute, after examining the findings.

Despite this critique, proponents of the H-1B program argue it addresses critical skill shortages in the U.S. workforce by bringing in unique expertise that complements the existing labor pool and maintains company competitiveness globally. They further assert that there are built-in protections to guard against wage abuse, though acknowledging that enforcement poses challenges.

The redirection of H-1B workers from tech to telecom and banking indicates that skilled foreign professionals are increasingly finding career opportunities outside of traditional technology firms.

According to Bloomberg.

Source: Original article

SIM Cards Replaced by New Mobile Technology System

July 6, 2025July 9, 2025 Staff ReporterBusiness, Technology 0

The telecommunications industry in Spain is on the cusp of a significant shift as it moves towards adopting eSIM technology, marking the beginning of the end for traditional SIM cards.

The telecommunications landscape is undergoing rapid evolution, and Spain is poised to bid farewell to the SIM cards that have powered mobile devices since their inception. The future of mobile connectivity lies in the technological innovation that eSIM brings. Historically, mobile phones have relied on a physical card as an essential component of the GSM network. Nonetheless, telecom companies in Spain are now facilitating the transition from conventional SIM cards to the new eSIM technology.

The SIM card, standing for Subscriber Identity Module, is a physical card that contains identification data utilized in mobile phones. Introduced in July 1991, it became a necessary element of the GSM network, ensuring that a phone could connect to a teleoperator network, and helping to identify the user’s phone line and contractual details. While phone numbers still function as the main identification linked to contracts, the once mandatory method of network operation is nearing obsolescence.

The advent of eSIM technology represents a paradigm shift from traditional physical SIM cards to digital versions. Without the need for a physical card, eSIM can be activated remotely via a QR code or operator application, offering several advantages:

Firstly, eSIMs can store multiple profiles from different operators on a single device, allowing users to effortlessly switch between lines or data plans. This is particularly advantageous for travelers, as it enables them to activate local data plans without swapping out cards. Additionally, eSIMs enhance security by eliminating the risk of theft or loss associated with physical SIMs. They are also compatible with nearly all devices currently available in the market.

Activating an eSIM is often straightforward and cost-free for consumers. Customers typically initiate the process through their operator’s app, by phone, or at physical stores. Despite this, some services, such as MultiSIM, which allows a main line to be used across multiple devices simultaneously, incur an additional charge. In Spain, companies like Movistar offer eSIM activation for free, while others, such as Orange or Vodafone, charge between €5 and €10.

eSIM technology offers significant benefits not only to consumers but also to businesses. The ability to connect multiple devices with a single line could streamline operations substantially for telecommunications firms. Moreover, the capability to maintain different numbers across countries presents a competitive edge, particularly for frequent travelers. The physical removal of the SIM card translates to cost reductions as well.

Currently, eSIM activation is available to any customer across carriers, with the caveat that the device in use must support it. While physical SIM cards remain in use, their popularity is waning as digital alternatives garner favor. In the greater context of technological advancement and connectivity, eSIMs are paving the way for more accessible, efficient, and global communication.

Source: Original article

Texas Floods Kill Dozens; 21 Children Among Victims

July 6, 2025July 9, 2025 Staff ReporterEnvironment, Nation 0

Flash floods in Texas have resulted in the deaths of at least 68 people across five counties, and officials warn the toll may continue to rise.

The devastating flash floods sweeping through Texas have claimed the lives of at least 68 people, with the possibility of more casualties as rescue operations continue. Five counties across the state have been severely impacted.

Kerr County has reported the highest number of fatalities with 59 confirmed deaths. According to Sheriff Larry Leitha, among the deceased are 38 adults and 21 children, illustrating the wide-reaching impact of the natural disaster.

In Travis County, local authorities confirmed four deaths. County Judge Andy Brown shared this update as emergency services continue their efforts to locate and assist those still unaccounted for.

Burnet County also experienced tragic losses, with two people confirmed dead. This information was verified by the county’s emergency management coordinator.

Similarly, Kendall County officials reported two fatalities. The county’s local officials issued a statement confirming these deaths while highlighting ongoing search and rescue operations.

Elsewhere, Tom Green County has reported one death, which was confirmed by the San Angelo Police Department. These figures contribute to the overall death toll as communities grapple with the aftermath of the floods.

The situation remains dynamic as rescue crews work tirelessly to find the missing and support affected residents throughout Texas. Officials warn that as rescue teams reach more remote areas, the death toll is likely to rise further.

This report is based on updates provided by regional authorities, highlighting the collaborative efforts in managing the crisis, according to BBC News.

Source: Original article

Catholic Church Opposes MAGA-Backed Bill, Calls It a Moral Failure

July 5, 2025July 9, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, Opinion, Politics 0

The proposed legislation allocates billions toward aggressive immigration enforcement and cuts vital health and food assistance programs, drawing widespread condemnation from faith leaders across the United States.

A controversial legislative proposal is drawing significant criticism from religious leaders nationwide due to its heavy investment in aggressive immigration enforcement and proposed cuts to healthcare and food assistance. Faith leaders are voicing concerns over the ethical implications and potential social consequences of such a move.

The bill primarily focuses on allocating over $150 billion towards enforcing border policies and bolstering immigration crackdowns. This includes a dramatic increase in the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention budget, set to grow from $3.4 billion to $45 billion by 2029. Professor Donald Moynihan of the University of Michigan highlighted that the ICE budget would surpass the combined funding for all 50 federal prisons.

Critics argue that this immense funding could create a self-perpetuating deportation infrastructure, drawing parallels to the private prison system and military complex. As with military spending, increased funding could incentivize further crackdowns and family separations, leading to a cycle of enforcement.

The legislation also targets faith communities by removing places of worship from the Department of Homeland Security’s sensitive locations list, making it easier for ICE agents to conduct enforcement actions there. Consequently, many religious communities have reported declines in attendance, as the threat of enforcement deters families from practicing their faith.

Prominent Catholics, including Cardinal Robert McElroy and Bishop Jaime Soto, alongside leaders from Episcopalian, Jewish, Lutheran, Presbyterian, and Muslim communities, have signed a letter opposing the bill. They argue that the legislation’s focus on a border wall could drive migrants into remote regions, increasing the risk of deaths, harming the local environment, and forcing asylum-seekers to rely on human smugglers.

Religious leaders advocate for creating legal migration avenues and a legalization program for immigrants who have long contributed to the U.S. economy. They assert these alternatives would better serve immigrants and the nation than a mass deportation campaign.

The bill also proposes severe cuts to healthcare and food assistance, including slashing nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid. This reduction could jeopardize countless lives, leading to increased poverty, bankruptcies, and closures of vital healthcare facilities. Additionally, the bill aims to cut approximately $186 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by 2034, raising concerns about food insecurity for millions.

According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the legislation would exacerbate income inequality by transferring wealth from the nation’s poorest citizens to the wealthiest. This aspect particularly troubles faith leaders, who emphasize the moral obligation to support the most vulnerable.

Archbishop Timothy P. Broglio, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, criticized the bill for offering tax breaks to some while undermining social safety nets through significant cuts to nutrition assistance and Medicaid. He noted the bill’s failure to protect families and children by exclusively focusing on enforcement rather than preserving access to legal protections.

Faith leaders argue the bill’s approach is a moral failure, urging lawmakers to find a better path forward. They call on senators to reconsider the provisions, emphasizing the need to protect human dignity and uphold the common good.

Study Links Coffee Drinking Habits to Longevity

July 5, 2025July 9, 2025 Staff ReporterHealth, Food 0

Drinking coffee black or with minimal sweeteners may contribute to a longer lifespan, according to a recent study.

Does your morning coffee come with cream and sugar, or do you prefer it black? A new study suggests that your choice could have implications for your longevity. According to research led by Tufts University, taking your coffee black or with minimal additives may be linked to a longer life.

The study found that coffee drinkers generally tend to outlive non-coffee drinkers, but this potential benefit is most pronounced when the coffee is consumed black or with minimal sugar and saturated fats. If you prefer your coffee with significant amounts of sugar or full-cream milk, the benefits might be negated.

Bingjie Zhou, an epidemiologist from Tufts University, explained that this research breaks new ground by focusing specifically on the impact of additives on the relationship between coffee consumption and mortality risk. “Few studies have examined how coffee additives could impact the link between coffee consumption and mortality risk, and our study is among the first to quantify how much sweetener and saturated fat are being added,” Zhou said.

The findings are consistent with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which recommend limiting added sugar and saturated fat. Over the course of 9 to 11 years, data was collected from 46,332 U.S. adults aged 20 or older, documented during government health surveys. During that time, 7,074 participants died, and these statistics were then analyzed in conjunction with their coffee consumption habits.

The research identified that coffee consumers had a noticeably lower risk of dying from any cause compared to non-drinkers. However, this statistic held true primarily for those who consumed little to no sugar and saturated fat with their coffee. Specifically, drinking black coffee or coffee with very low sugar and fat content could reduce the risk of earlier death by 14% compared to individuals who abstained from coffee altogether.

Ideally, consuming between two to three cups of coffee per day is suggested for these health benefits. While researchers accounted for various factors that could influence mortality rates, such as exercise habits, alcohol consumption, age, gender, and education level, the study does not establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

There might still be undiscovered variables that affect both coffee consumption and overall mortality, yet the study provides strong evidence and aligns with previous research on the health benefits of coffee. While the caffeine content in coffee plays a role in its health benefits, the study suggests that the addition of sugar and saturated fat could weaken these positive effects. Notably, decaffeinated coffee drinkers did not experience the same reduction in mortality risk.

“The health benefits of coffee might be attributable to its bioactive compounds, but our results suggest that the addition of sugar and saturated fat may reduce the mortality benefits,” noted Fang Fang Zhang from Tufts University.

Wimbledon Eliminates Line Judges After 148 Years

July 5, 2025July 9, 2025 Staff ReporterSports, Technology 0

The All England Lawn Tennis Club has decided to replace human line judges with an electronic calling system at Wimbledon, ending a long-standing tradition.

The historic lawns of Wimbledon have witnessed a significant transition as organizers adopt an electronic calling system, phasing out the use of human line judges. The change marks a poignant shift for the tournament, which has been synonymous with the presence of these officials clad in distinctive Ralph Lauren uniforms.

Pauline Eyre, a former line judge at Wimbledon, nostalgically recalls stepping onto the grass courts for the first time at age 21, not as a player, but as an official. Despite describing herself as a “pretty bad junior player” who never advanced far in local tournaments, Eyre achieved her career’s peak as a line judge at Wimbledon. However, this chapter closes as technology steps in to take over these duties.

“At the end of the day, a tennis match is sport, and sport is about people,” Eyre told CNN Sports. “And I don’t think technology necessarily makes everything better. I don’t think it’s improving the quality of the line calling because line calling was always excellent.”

The shift toward electronic line calling (ELC) aligns Wimbledon with other major tennis events. While the ATP and WTA Tours, along with the Australian and US Opens, have embraced this technology, Roland-Garros remains the lone grand slam using human officials for calls. The decision at Wimbledon has stirred mixed reactions, highlighting the balance between tradition and technological progression.

The All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) chief executive, Sally Bolton, noted that the change is designed to provide “maximum accuracy in our officiating” and ensure players experience “the same conditions” as in most other events. Andrew Jarrett, Wimbledon’s tournament referee between 2006 and 2019, argued that the adoption of electronic systems is “almost certainly correct,” citing improved accuracy over human eyesight.

Despite its advantages, Eyre and other purists grieve the disappearing role of line judges. “You have to be a bit of a saint to want to spend your weekends umpiring children’s tennis matches without the carrot of Wimbledon at the end of it,” she remarked, highlighting the reduced incentive for aspiring officials.

Players’ opinions on the shift vary. Women’s top seed Aryna Sabalenka expressed a slight preference for electronic systems due to their clarity, while defending women’s champion Barbora Krejčíková and American star Frances Tiafoe prefer the traditional method that allowed for line call challenges.

The transition to technology is not without hiccups. An automated “out” call during a recent match caused confusion and laughter among spectators, demonstrating some imperfections in the new system. Similarly, concerns about the volume of electronic calls have been raised, with some players claiming they are not always audible, unlike the clear shouts from human judges.

Despite these challenges, Wimbledon’s move away from human line judges signifies a broader trend within tennis, emphasizing technological accuracy over tradition. Yet, many, including Eyre, remember line judging with fondness.

“We just wanted to be part of something we loved,” said Eyre. As she transitions from line judging to stand-up comedy, she reflects on the unique aspects of her former role that made it so special and, perhaps, now missed.

The storied charm of Wimbledon’s human line judges is likely to be remembered with nostalgia—an emblem of the tournament’s rich history now absorbed into the annals of sporting evolution.

Line judges at Wimbledon, once thought of as merely functional, now hold a place in tennis history cherished by traditionalists who keenly feel their absence.

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty & Dr. Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI

July 4, 2025July 8, 2025 Staff ReporterCommunity, Cover, Health 0

For the first time in the history of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI), during a formal ceremony Dr. Amit Chakrabarty and Dr. Hetal Gor were formally administered the oath of office as the President & Chairperson of the Board of Trustees of AAPI, respectively at a solemn ceremony at the AAPI office in Oak Brook, IL, on July 3^rd, 2025.

Dr. Suresh Reddy, a past President of AAPI and an elected Trustee of the Oak Brook Township administered the oath of Office to the incoming leaders of AAPI, who are committed to take AAPI to the next level in the coming year.

According to Dr. Satheesh Kathula, current President of AAPI, “In accordance with AAPI Bylaws, the President-Elect and Chair-Elect of the Board of Trustees officially assumed office on July 3rd. While the ceremonial Gavel Transfer will be held during the Annual Convention Gala on Saturday, July 26, 2025, the formal Presidential & BOT Chair Handover Ceremony was held on Thursday, July 3, 2025. This ceremony marks a meaningful leadership transition for our organization.”

“We have the potential to make a significant impact on the healthcare landscape of this country,” Dr. Chakrabarty said. “My goal this year is to unify AAPI by transcending the regional divides that have hindered our progress in recent years. Indian American physicians represent tremendous talent and potential, and the key to realizing that lies in collective action and a united voice—something I am committed to fostering.”

Dr. Hetal Gor, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist, assumed charge as the Chair, Board of Trustees of AAPI. Dr Gor is the president/Founder of Bergen Indian Medical Association , President /Founder of US chapter of FOGSI (Federation of OBGYN Society of India, and had served as the past President of the American Association of OBGYN of Indian Origin. Dr Gor is the Chair of North NJ chapter of Indian American Women Entrepreneurs Association. Dr Gor is a Board of Trustees of Bergen Performing Arts Center in Englewood, NJ, where she brings Indian art and artists to showcase Indian Heritage.

Dr. Meher Medavaram, a Board Certified in Family Medicine Physician and a Fellow of Academy of American Family Physician, serving as the Medical Director of Mount Sinai Hospital, FAQH Center, and a Staff Physician Advocate at Good Samaritan Hospital as well as a Clinical Preceptor at UIC College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine CMU School of Medicine also was administered the oath of office as the President Elect of AAPI.

The growing influence of physicians of Indian heritage is evident, as increasingly physicians of Indian origin hold critical positions in healthcare, academic, research, and administrative positions across the nation. We the physicians of Indian origin are proud of our great achievements and contributions to our motherland, India, our adopted land, the US, and in a very significant way to the transformation of Indo-US relations.

Serving 1 in every 7 patients in the US, AAPI members care for millions of patients every day, while several of them have risen to hold high-flying jobs, shaping the policies and programs, and inventions that shape the landscape of healthcare in the US and around the world.

“Since its inception in 1982, AAPI has been at the forefront, representing a conglomeration of more than 125,000 practicing physicians in the United States, seeking to be the united voice for the physicians of Indian origin. I trust and believe that the new Team under Dr. Amit Chakrabarty will continue the noble mission and strengthen our efforts to make AAPI reach greater heights,” said Dr. Satheesh Kathula. For more details about AAPI, please visit: www.appiusa,org

House Approves Trump’s Tax Bill, Marking Second-Term Milestone

July 4, 2025July 4, 2025 Staff ReporterFinance/Economy, Cover 0

House Republicans successfully passed President Donald Trump’s significant tax cuts and spending reduction bill, heralding it as a landmark achievement for his second term, despite fierce opposition from Democrats.

In a closely contested vote, House Republicans pushed through President Donald Trump’s tax cuts and spending reductions bill with a slim 218-214 margin. The approval came just in time for the Fourth of July deadline, signaling a high-stakes victory for Trump’s administration as they compile a core policy initiative early in his second term.

The bill, widely seen as a key GOP victory, was finalized amidst controversy and political maneuvering. Two Republican lawmakers joined all Democrats in opposing the legislation. GOP leaders, in collaboration with Trump, worked tirelessly to quell internal dissent and secure the votes necessary for passage.

Celebrating the legislative success in Iowa at the start of events commemorating the nation’s approaching 250th anniversary, Trump expressed gratitude toward Republican lawmakers, disparaging Democrats for their resistance to what he described as a beneficial measure.

House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana echoed Trump’s sentiment, encouraging Republicans to unify behind the bill. The colossal document, nearing 900 pages, encapsulates multiple Republican priorities under one legislative package, now labeled colloquially as Trump’s “one big beautiful bill.”

The enactment preserves $4.5 trillion in tax cuts from 2017 and introduces new ones, favoring provisions such as deductions for workers’ tips and overtime, and a sizeable deduction for older adults with particular income qualifications. Furthermore, it pledges $350 billion towards national security, including advancement in Trump’s deportation policies and the development of a new defensive system, dubbed the “Golden Dome.”

However, to offset substantial tax revenue losses, the bill implements substantial reductions, slashing $1.2 trillion from Medicaid and food stamp funding, with stricter work requirements imposed on beneficiaries. The Congressional Budget Office warns of a $3.3 trillion deficit increase over the next decade, with 11.8 million individuals potentially losing health coverage.

The bill starkly contrasts with Democratic priorities and faced unified Democratic opposition. Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York mounted a record-breaking speech on the House floor, challenging the ramifications of Trump’s “big ugly bill.” His extensive address underscored Democrats’ concerns over social program cutbacks, painting the legislation as detrimental to vulnerable populations.

As Jeffries highlighted the human costs, Democrats collectively denounced the measure as regressive and harmful to working-class citizens. Jeffries’ heartfelt oration warned of life-threatening consequences due to Medicaid cuts and their broader impact on public welfare. Republican counterarguments focused on preventing imminent tax increases while reaffirming beliefs in economic growth and program efficacy through regulatory revisions.

The Senate approved the bill days prior, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. As tensions simmered on the House floor, Johnson and Trump’s team marshaled extensive resources to rally wavering Republicans, balancing concerns between moderates and conservatives within the party.

After the conclusion of the vote, jubilant Republicans celebrated, with Trump loyalists attributing personal political stakes to the passage of the bill. Critics warned that bucking Trump’s agenda could result in significant electoral consequences, illustrating the fierce political entanglements intertwined with the passage of the legislation.

The bill represents a profound challenge to former Democratic administrations’ accomplishments, notably scaling back healthcare expansions from the Affordable Care Act and relaxing green energy incentives earmarked in prior congressional terms. Democrats caution against severe social repercussions, particularly for those reliant on federal assistance programs.

In summary, proponents argue the legislation fosters economic sustainability and secures Trump’s fiscal legacy, while detractors emphasize its expansive social health costs. The ongoing debate underscores entrenched partisan divides, persistent ideological battles, and the complexity of bipartisan governance.

According to Associated Press

Source: Original article

Jaishankar Refutes Trump’s Ceasefire Claims

July 3, 2025July 8, 2025 Staff ReporterPolitics, Diplomacy 0

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar refuted U.S. President Donald Trump’s claims that trade pressure was used to coerce India and Pakistan into agreeing to a ceasefire.

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has provided a firsthand account to counter U.S. President Donald Trump’s assertions regarding a purported use of trade pressure to achieve a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Jaishankar clarified that during crucial communications, no such linkage between trade and ceasefire was made as far as India was concerned.

Speaking in New York, Jaishankar recalled being present on May 9 when U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance spoke to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi via phone. “I can tell you that I was in the room when Vice President Vance spoke to Prime Minister Modi on the night of May 9, saying that the Pakistanis would launch a very massive assault on India,” he stated.

Jaishankar emphasized that India did not capitulate to any pressures and that Prime Minister Modi remained resolute despite threats from Pakistan. “We did not accept certain things,” he explained, “and the Prime Minister was impervious to what the Pakistanis were threatening to do.”

Jaishankar further elaborated that the Indian response was firm and immediate following Pakistan’s aggressive actions. “The Pakistanis did attack us massively that night, (and) we responded very quickly,” he recounted, providing a detailed sequence of events.

The sequence included a subsequent interaction with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, which Jaishankar discussed. “And the next morning, Mr. Rubio called me up and said the Pakistanis were ready to talk,” Jaishankar said, indicating a breakthrough in dialogues without mentioning any trade negotiations.

On the same day, Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations, Major General Kashif Abdullah, directly contacted his Indian counterpart, Lieutenant General Rajiv Ghai, to propose a ceasefire. Jaishankar reaffirmed these details from his personal experience, stressing the absence of trade discussions in these engagements.

Trump reiterated claims of having leveraged trade to mediate a ceasefire during a news conference in The Hague. He stated, “I ended that with a series of phone calls on trade,” alleging that both countries were pushed towards a deal by withholding trade agreements.

Jaishankar, however, contested these assertions, underscoring that trade and diplomacy operated independently. “I think the trade people are doing what the trade people should be doing, which is negotiate with numbers and lines and products and do their tradeoffs,” he said, emphasizing a more structured and professional approach to trade negotiations.

Operation Sindoor was initiated by India targeting terrorist bases in Pakistan as a retaliation for the Pahalgam terrorist attack, which was claimed to be orchestrated by The Resistance Front, a group linked to Pakistan-supported Lashkar-e-Taiba, according to IANS.

Source: Original article

GOP Leaders Work to Unite Party on Trump Megabill

July 3, 2025July 8, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA, Economy 0

Republican leaders in the House are urgently working to unite their party behind a substantial Senate bill aimed at enacting former President Donald Trump’s domestic agenda before the upcoming holiday weekend.

The effort is proving challenging, as both moderate and conservative Republicans have expressed concerns. Moderates are troubled by the expanded cuts to Medicaid — a change made in the Senate — while conservatives are alarmed by the increased deficit spending also introduced by the Senate. These divisions threaten the bill’s passage, as the GOP holds only a slim majority in the House, necessitating nearly unanimous support from the party.

Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, expressed skepticism about the bill: “If you look at the totality of this, I don’t believe this delivers what the president, what the administration, were working to deliver on,” he said, indicating ongoing efforts to manage deficit spending.

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson of Louisiana and other GOP leaders are racing against time to consolidate support for the bill. The legislation is critical to Trump’s second-term agenda, comprising sweeping tax cuts, a hardline stance on immigration, a shift away from green energy policies, and substantial reductions in federal health and nutrition programs.

House GOP members, from moderates to hard-liners, originally cautioned against a bill changed by the Senate that could be perceived as “worse.” They now face a difficult choice: abandon their initial stance to deliver a victory for Trump, or maintain their position and risk defeating the bill.

Echoing the internal struggle, a moderate House Republican remarked to The Hill, “Maybe I’ll get lucky and have a rough enough landing or something that I’m unable to make [it] to D.C. for a few weeks,” underscoring the challenge of their predicament.

Adding to the pressure, former President Trump is strongly advocating for the bill, warning House Republicans of potential primary challenges if they oppose the legislation he terms the “big, beautiful bill.” This is not an idle threat; Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who opposed the House version, has been targeted by a MAGA-super PAC, and Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina faced backlash from Trump, leading to his announcement of retirement after the current term.

While Democrats cannot block the bill, they are underscoring its most controversial elements, like significant cuts to low-income health and nutrition programs — proposals aimed at funding the Republican tax cuts. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries criticized the bill, saying, “This bill won’t make life more affordable for the American people. It will make life more expensive.”

The timeline for passing the legislation adds another layer of complexity. Johnson and GOP leaders aim to meet a self-imposed deadline of July 4, requiring swift action from lawmakers.

Despite the tight timeline, there is skepticism about meeting this goal. Conservatives and moderates alike have voiced concerns about increased national debt and deficits, complicating efforts to consolidate support. Rep. Marlin Stutzman of Indiana stressed the need to ensure the bill is more fiscally responsible for future generations.

On Tuesday, the House Rules Committee held a meeting as the first step in the legislative process. Subsequent actions include convening the House to debate and vote on procedural rules before deciding on the legislation. However, progress is already facing hurdles; Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland, head of the Freedom Caucus, intends to vote against the procedural rule, jeopardizing the bill’s advancement.

Trump continues to push the bill, praising the Senate’s approval and urging the House to follow suit, highlighting its significance. A senior White House official stressed the urgency of passing the bill in its current form before July 4, dismissing any notion of conferencing the House and Senate versions.

As the deadline looms, the White House is intensifying efforts to rally support, with top officials engaged in outreach to ensure the bill’s passage.

Source: Original article

Powell: Fed Rates Unchanged This Year Due to Tariffs

July 1, 2025 Staff ReporterBusiness, Cover, Economy, Finance/Economy 0

The Federal Reserve would likely have lowered interest rates this year if not for significant policy changes by President Donald Trump, Chair Jerome Powell stated Tuesday.

In a central banking forum in Sintra, Portugal, Jerome Powell, Chair of the Federal Reserve, indicated that the Fed might have reduced interest rates this year had it not been for the substantial policy shifts implemented by President Donald Trump. When questioned about the possibility of rate cuts, Powell remarked, “I do think that’s right.”

So far this year, the Federal Reserve has refrained from lowering interest rates. Central bankers anticipate that Trump’s tariffs will impact the U.S. economy, prompting them to take a cautious approach, opting to monitor how these changes affect the economic landscape before making any decisions on rate adjustments.

This cautious stance, however, has drawn criticism from President Trump, who has persistently criticized Powell’s decision not to reduce rates. Trump has called Powell derogatory names such as a “numbskull” and a “moron” for maintaining higher interest rates compared to other countries.

In a handwritten note shared on his social media platform on Monday, Trump lambasted Powell, alleging that the Fed’s policies have financially harmed the United States. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that this note was delivered to the Fed on the same day.

The sentiment to cut rates is shared, albeit to a lesser extent, by others within the Fed. Two officials — Michelle Bowman, Fed Vice Chair for Supervision, and Fed Governor Christopher Waller — have opined that a rate cut could be considered as early as July. However, unlike Trump, they have refrained from advocating dramatic cuts, emphasizing that any decision should be contingent on economic conditions, specifically the severity of tariff-induced inflation.

Despite some internal support for rate adjustment, the likelihood of a rate cut in July remains slim, as indicated by futures data which estimate an 81% probability of rates holding steady at the Fed’s July 29-30 meeting, compared to a 19% chance of a quarter-point rate cut.

Powell, during his panel in Sintra, acknowledged that a majority of Fed officials foresee the necessity of reducing rates later this year, depending on inflation trends and labor market developments. He stated, “A solid majority of (Fed officials) do expect that it will become appropriate later this year to begin to reduce rates again.”

When asked about the possibility of a July rate cut, Powell refrained from giving a definitive answer, noting that he “can’t say” but would not dismiss any meeting from consideration.

European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, who was also on the Sintra panel, expressed support for Powell’s data-driven approach to policymaking and commended him for his apolitical stance. She affirmed that Powell “epitomizes the standard of a courageous central banker.”

Powell has refrained from responding to President Trump’s public barbs and reiterated his commitment to his responsibilities, stating, “I’m very focused on just doing my job.” Lagarde, when asked how she would respond to criticisms akin to those from Trump, supported Powell’s stance, suggesting, “I think we would (all) do exactly the same thing as our colleague, Jay Powell, does.”

Following Lagarde’s comment, attendees at the conference offered applause in support. Powell reiterated the Fed’s mission to maintain macroeconomic stability, emphasizing the need for a non-partisan approach, stating, “We don’t take sides. We don’t play one side against the other. We stay out of issues that are really not our bailiwick.”

Source: Original article

Senate Approves Trump Agenda Bill After Extended Voting Session

July 1, 2025July 8, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, Security 0

The Senate has narrowly passed President Donald Trump’s domestic agenda bill, which now moves to the House of Representatives for further approval.

The Senate passed President Donald Trump’s ambitious legislative package on a knife-edge vote of 50-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the decisive vote. This megabill represents a core component of Trump’s domestic agenda and has set the stage for a significant legislative battle as it heads to the House of Representatives.

Republican leaders in the Senate managed to secure enough votes after intense negotiations with key holdouts in their ranks. However, the next hurdle appears imminent, with GOP leaders in the House now facing a high-stakes effort to ensure the bill reaches the president’s desk by July 4.

While visiting a makeshift detention facility called “Alligator Alcatraz” in Florida, President Trump confidently predicted the bill’s successful passage in the House. He also downplayed concerns related to potential impacts on American health care coverage, which have been a point of contention among critics of the bill.

This extensive bill outlines significant tax reductions and boosts in funding for national security, all of which will be offset by the most considerable cuts to the federal safety net seen in decades. As Washington gears up for another legislative showdown, the focus now turns to the House as lawmakers evaluate the sweeping changes proposed within this multi-trillion-dollar plan.

According to CNN, the bill’s advancement symbolizes a pivotal moment in Trump’s tenure, potentially reshaping the nation’s fiscal landscape if fully enacted.

Source: Original article

Gas Vehicle Surpasses EV Leader as Best-Selling Car Worldwide

July 1, 2025July 8, 2025 Staff ReporterBusiness, Technology 0

The Toyota RAV4 reclaimed its position as the world’s best-selling car in 2024, narrowly surpassing the Tesla Model Y.

In a continually evolving global car market, Toyota has managed to reassert its dominance. The Toyota RAV4 has reclaimed its position as the world’s best-selling vehicle, edging ahead of the Tesla Model Y. With this achievement, Toyota has demonstrated its resilient market strategy and extensive appeal, especially notable in a market increasingly shifting toward electric vehicles.

Toyota’s triumph is not limited to just the RAV4. The company placed five models in the global top ten, reflecting its broad appeal across multiple vehicle categories. Joining the RAV4 are the Corolla Cross, Corolla sedan, Hilux, and Camry, highlighting Toyota’s comprehensive market reach.

This 2024 ranking originates from industry analyst Felipe Munoz, who utilized a wide array of sources for his analysis. His robust methodology combines data from national statistics offices, dealership associations, customs records, specialized websites, industry blogs, and other analysts’ informed estimates. Munoz’s study encompasses 153 markets, accounting for approximately 99% of global car sales, providing an in-depth look into the automotive industry’s current landscape.

The numbers illustrate Toyota’s narrow victory with combined sales of the RAV4 and its China-market variant, the Wildlander, reaching 1,187,000 units. This slightly surpassed the Tesla Model Y’s sales figure of 1,185,000 units, marking a narrow yet significant win.

It’s notable that both models received updates shortly after the reporting period. Toyota’s RAV4 underwent a complete redesign, yet to hit the market, while Tesla has already released its refreshed Model Y, known as Juniper. Despite these updates, the Model Y retains its status as the best-selling electric vehicle, although 2025 figures suggest a potential slowdown.

The compact crossover segment continues to drive significant sales, as evidenced by the Toyota Corolla Cross, which secured third place in the rankings with 859,000 units sold. Its widespread availability across various markets contributes largely to its success. Trailing closely is the Honda CR-V/Breeze SUV, which achieved sales of 854,000 units.

Toyota’s stronghold is further solidified by the Corolla sedan with 697,000 units sold, landing it in fifth place, and the Hilux pickup with 617,000 units, in sixth place globally. Despite its aging model, the Hilux stands out as the world’s best-selling pickup, even as it is absent from North American and Chinese markets, two of the largest for trucks. In contrast, the Ford F-150 sold 595,000 units, securing the seventh position overall and placing second in U.S. vehicle sales, shadowed only by the RAV4.

Closing the top ten are sedans maintaining their relevance amidst the rising tide of crossovers and SUVs. The Toyota Camry achieved eighth place with 593,000 sales, followed by the Tesla Model 3 at 560,000, and the BYD Qin, the sole Chinese brand to make this year’s list, at 502,000. The inclusion of BYD underscores its growing influence as a competitor in both the EV and traditional combustion markets.

These figures depict a global automotive landscape where traditional manufacturers like Toyota retain significant influence while newer players like Tesla and BYD carve out substantial market niches. As the industry continues to evolve, particularly toward electrification, these dynamics will likely shift, presenting both challenges and opportunities for manufacturers worldwide.

According to Carscoops, these developments reflect the ongoing transformations within the car industry as manufacturers strive to meet changing consumer expectations and regulatory landscapes.

Source: Original article

Justice Department to Focus on Revoking Naturalized Citizenship

July 1, 2025July 8, 2025 Staff ReporterConflict, Immigration 0

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is intensifying efforts to revoke the citizenship of naturalized Americans who have committed crimes, aligning with the Trump administration’s broader immigration policies.

The recent initiative by the DOJ emphasizes denaturalization, focusing on individuals involved in activities categorized under “war crimes,” “extrajudicial killings,” “human rights abuses,” and those posing ongoing threats, including terrorism. The directive is part of a memo, urging the DOJ’s Civil Division to prioritize these cases to the full extent permitted by law and supported by evidence.

This development marks a significant escalation in the Trump administration’s immigration agenda, which seeks to target not just undocumented immigrants but also lawful permanent residents and naturalized citizens.

Naturalization is the process by which U.S. citizenship is granted to a lawful permanent resident, following criteria set by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), there were 24.5 million naturalized citizens in the U.S. in 2022, accounting for 53% of the immigrant population, based on data analyzed by the Migration Policy Institute.

The path to naturalization is rigorous, requiring individuals to be lawful permanent residents for a minimum of five years—exceptions are made for spouses of U.S. citizens and U.S. military members—and to possess proficiency in English as well as an understanding of U.S. history and government.

The shift towards increased denaturalization began under the Obama administration, as noted by Cassandra Burke Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University. The rise was due in part to improved digital tools for identifying cases of naturalization fraud. The trend has accelerated under the Trump administration, which has been actively pursuing denaturalization at unprecedented levels.

Statistics from the DOJ indicate at least 305 denaturalization cases were filed between 1990 and 2017, with the number surging during Trump’s first term. From January 2017 to August 2018, USCIS reviewed approximately 2,500 cases for possible denaturalization, referring over 110 cases to the DOJ for prosecution.

The recent memo from Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate includes denaturalization among the top five priorities for the DOJ’s Civil Division. Denaturalization is pursued in instances where individuals have allegedly obtained citizenship fraudulently by concealment of material facts or willful misrepresentation.

Concerns over the constitutional aspects of these efforts have been voiced, with Robertson arguing that civil litigation to strip citizenship may violate due process under the 14th Amendment. The DOJ’s approach allows for the potential use of denaturalization as a tool against free speech, targeting individuals and institutions for allegations ranging from antisemitism to criticism of U.S. foreign policy.

The DOJ has already denaturalized individuals in cases involving serious criminal convictions. One case involved the revocation of citizenship from a person convicted of collecting and distributing child sexual abuse material.

This DOJ initiative reflects a broader strategy by the Trump administration to leverage immigration policy as a means to address national security and public safety concerns, often amidst debate over the balance between enforcement and civil liberties.

Source: Original article

Justice Department Intensifies Denaturalization Drive, Raising Constitutional Concerns

July 1, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, Cover, USA 0

The Justice Department is increasingly focusing on stripping U.S. citizenship from certain naturalized Americans. According to a memo dated June 11, DOJ leadership is instructing attorneys to prioritize denaturalization in cases involving naturalized citizens who have committed specific crimes. The directive also grants U.S. attorneys more authority in deciding when to pursue such actions. This policy shift targets individuals not born in the United States, and as of 2023, nearly 25 million immigrants had obtained U.S. citizenship through naturalization.

The new emphasis on denaturalization has already produced results. On June 13, a judge revoked the citizenship of Elliott Duke, an American military veteran originally from the United Kingdom who uses they/them pronouns. Duke had been convicted of distributing child sexual abuse material, a crime they later admitted to committing even before becoming a U.S. citizen.

Historically, denaturalization was a prominent tool during the McCarthy era in the late 1940s and early 1950s. It was further utilized during the Obama administration and expanded under President Trump’s first term. The process has typically targeted individuals who concealed past crimes or affiliations with banned organizations—such as the Nazi Party or communist groups—on their citizenship applications.

In his memo, Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate emphasized the importance of this effort: “The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.”

This renewed focus aligns with the Trump administration’s broader effort to reshape the U.S. immigration system. President Trump has made immigration policy a central issue in his governance, seeking to end birthright citizenship and reduce refugee admissions. These moves reflect a fundamental redefinition of who is entitled to American citizenship.

However, constitutional scholars and immigration experts have expressed significant alarm about this denaturalization push. Cassandra Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, noted that the DOJ’s reliance on civil litigation for denaturalization raises serious concerns. In civil court, those targeted do not have the right to government-appointed attorneys, the standard of proof is lower, and cases can be resolved more quickly.

Robertson warned, “Stripping Americans of citizenship through civil litigation violates due process and infringes on the rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.”

Still, the move has supporters. Hans von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation endorsed the initiative, stating, “I do not understand how anyone could possibly be opposed to the Justice Department taking such action to protect the nation from obvious predators, criminals, and terrorists.” Regarding concerns over legal representation, he added, “Nothing prevents that alien from hiring their own lawyer to represent them. They are not entitled to have the government — and thus the American taxpayer — pay for their lawyer.”

He further argued, “That is not a ‘due process’ violation since all immigration proceedings are civil matters and no individuals — including American citizens — are entitled to government-furnished lawyers in any type of civil matter.”

Neither the DOJ nor the Trump White House commented on the matter.

The June 11 memo significantly broadens the categories of offenses that could trigger denaturalization. These include crimes related to national security and fraud against individuals or the government, such as Paycheck Protection Program loan fraud or Medicaid and Medicare fraud.

Sameera Hafiz, policy director at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, described the administration’s new approach as “very shocking and very concerning.” She stated, “It is kind of, in a way, trying to create a second class of U.S. citizens,” implying that naturalized citizens remain vulnerable to losing their status despite having followed legal processes.

Adding to these concerns, the memo grants federal attorneys the discretion to pursue denaturalization cases beyond the listed categories. “These categories do not limit the Civil Division from pursuing any particular case,” the memo reads, further noting that priorities may include “any other cases referred to the Civil Division that the Division determines to be sufficiently important to pursue.”

Steve Lubet, professor emeritus at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law, found this language troubling. “Many of the categories are so vague as to be meaningless. It isn’t even clear that they relate to fraudulent procurement, as opposed to post-naturalization conduct,” he observed.

Von Spakovsky countered that the government is right to be uncompromising. “When we extend the opportunity for naturalization to aliens, we are granting them a great privilege — the privilege of becoming a U.S. citizen,” he said. “Anyone who has abused the privilege of the opportunity of becoming a U.S. citizen should have that citizenship revoked when they engage in such reprehensible behavior.”

Lubet also pointed out the broader implications for families, particularly children who derived citizenship through a naturalized parent. “People who thought they were safely American and had done nothing wrong can suddenly be at risk of losing citizenship,” he said.

The DOJ did not address questions about how children of denaturalized parents would be affected or what would happen if individuals were rendered stateless.

The case of Elliott Duke appears to be an early example of how the new denaturalization efforts might play out. Duke, who became a U.S. citizen in January 2013, was found to have started distributing child sexual abuse material while serving in Germany in 2012. Duke relinquished their U.K. citizenship to become an American. The DOJ filed the case in February in Louisiana, citing both the prior conviction and Duke’s failure to disclose criminal activity during the naturalization process.

During the legal proceedings, Duke struggled to secure representation and could not attend court in Louisiana. “My heart shattered when I read the lines [of the order]. My world broke apart,” Duke said.

Shumate, in a statement, warned, “If you commit serious crimes before you become a U.S. citizen and then lie about them during your naturalization process, the Justice Department will discover the truth and come after you.”

Laura Bingham, executive director of the Temple University Institute for Law Innovation and Technology, cautioned that the Duke case sets a worrying precedent. “Citizenship is not supposed to be something that you can continuously open up for some people, and you can’t for others,” she said.

Historically, denaturalization surged during the McCarthy era, with over 22,000 cases filed annually. “At the height of denaturalization, there were about 22,000 cases a year… It was huge,” Robertson recalled. However, a 1967 Supreme Court ruling curtailed the practice, citing its incompatibility with democratic values.

From that point until the Obama era, denaturalization became rare. The Obama administration revived it with initiatives like Operation Janus, which sought out potential naturalization fraud, especially linked to national security concerns.

Trump’s first term saw further expansion, with a preference for pursuing denaturalization through civil rather than criminal courts. Although Robertson questions how many cases will meet the criteria outlined in the recent memo, she fears the aggressive push may target individuals with minimal infractions. “It fits in with the other ways that we’ve seen immigration enforcement happening,” she said.

This recent policy shift marks a significant chapter in U.S. immigration enforcement, raising crucial questions about due process, equal protection, and the long-term security of naturalized citizenship.

US Embassy in India Emphasizes Strict Visa Screening and Social Media Disclosure as National Security Measure

July 1, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, Cover, USA 0

The United States Embassy in India has reiterated the stringent vetting procedures tied to its visa policies, describing each visa adjudication as a matter of national security. In a statement posted on the social media platform X, the embassy highlighted the requirement for all applicants to provide complete details of their social media presence over the last five years while applying for nonimmigrant visas.

“Visa applicants are required to list all social media usernames or handles of every platform they have used from the last 5 years on the DS-160 visa application form. Applicants certify that the information in their visa application is true and correct before they sign and submit,” stated the US Embassy in a recent post.

This disclosure requirement, according to the embassy, is an integral part of the broader national security screening process employed by the United States. Failing to comply with this requirement could have serious consequences. “Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas,” the post further warned.

This advisory is part of a broader campaign by the embassy to inform and caution visa applicants about the importance of accuracy and transparency in their applications. The embassy’s post included digital posters reiterating the security aspect of the visa process. One poster read, “Every U.S. visa adjudication is a national security decision,” and emphasized, “The United States requires visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on visa application forms. We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting.”

In a related update earlier this month, the embassy had urged applicants falling under F, M, or J non-immigrant visa categories to make their social media accounts public. This recommendation was made to aid US authorities in verifying applicants’ identities and establishing their admissibility under American law. These visa categories include F and M for students and J for exchange visitors.

The embassy elaborated that since 2019, the United States has mandated the disclosure of “social media identifiers” as part of both immigrant and non-immigrant visa applications. This long-standing requirement, according to the embassy, is vital to national security and helps immigration authorities thoroughly vet each applicant.

The embassy’s statements come amid a wider crackdown on immigration in the United States. Recently, the Trump administration intensified enforcement actions in Los Angeles, targeting immigration violations more aggressively. In light of this, the US Embassy in India has stepped up its communication, providing frequent updates on policy and legal expectations for visa applicants.

On June 24, the embassy issued another warning, stating that immigration law enforcement had been stepped up across the country. The message was unambiguous—those found violating immigration laws would face strict penalties, including detention, deportation, and permanent ineligibility for future visas.

Adding to this, the embassy’s statement noted, “The US had increased enforcement of immigration laws, and violators would face detention, deportation and permanent consequences for future visa eligibility.” The warning was not limited to overstays or misrepresentation; it also made it clear that illegal entry into the United States would result in jail time and removal from the country.

This was not the only caution issued during the month. On June 19, the embassy released another strongly worded statement reminding applicants that obtaining a US visa is not a guaranteed right but a discretionary privilege. It emphasized that screening and scrutiny continue even after a visa is issued. Authorities in the US reserve the right to revoke a visa if the holder is found in violation of any laws.

The embassy said, “A US visa was a privilege, not a right,” underscoring that post-issuance reviews are routine and can result in visa cancellation if necessary. It further added that involvement in illegal activities, including drug use or breaking US laws while in the country on a student or visitor visa, could severely impact one’s ability to receive future visas.

This line of messaging from the US Embassy in India has been consistent throughout the month. The campaign has included reminders that although the US continues to welcome legal travelers, any attempt to enter the country illegally or abuse the visa system will not be tolerated.

Reiterating this stance, the embassy made a significant statement on June 16, asserting that the United States “will not tolerate those who facilitate illegal and mass immigration to the US.” This message also revealed a policy shift: the US had introduced “new visa restrictions” aimed specifically at foreign government officials and individuals who violate immigration laws.

This multi-pronged approach by the US government reflects a broader tightening of immigration and visa processes, especially in the wake of mounting concerns around illegal immigration. With policies targeting both individual applicants and those facilitating unlawful entry, the US is sending a clear signal about the importance of legal compliance.

By highlighting these issues through multiple channels and on various dates, the US Embassy in India is working to ensure that prospective travelers are well aware of the rules and expectations. The detailed advisories, warnings about visa ineligibility, and emphasis on national security collectively serve to underline the gravity with which the US government views visa applications.

These measures not only aim to safeguard national interests but also serve as a deterrent for those considering bypassing legal immigration processes. By requiring disclosure of social media identifiers, encouraging transparency, and increasing legal enforcement, the United States is fortifying its immigration system against potential risks.

At the same time, the US government continues to stress that it welcomes legal immigration and supports those who abide by the rules. But any deviation from lawful practices will result in serious and lasting consequences.

The embassy’s message, repeated throughout June, is unambiguous: compliance with visa rules, honesty in the application process, and adherence to US laws are non-negotiable. The US authorities are equipped to detect discrepancies and enforce immigration laws without hesitation.

From urging public visibility of social media accounts to warning against drug use and law violations, the embassy has rolled out a series of reminders to leave no room for misunderstanding. These reminders serve both as guidance for sincere applicants and a deterrent for those contemplating any kind of misuse of the system.

Ultimately, the consistent tone and content of the embassy’s advisories reflect a strategic policy direction that prioritizes national security while maintaining opportunities for legal entry. Through transparency, accountability, and firm enforcement, the United States aims to maintain the integrity of its immigration system.

Shifting Social Security Rules Push Retirement Age Higher: How Americans Can Strategize Early Retirement Plans

July 1, 2025 Staff ReporterEconomy, Cover, USA 0

For many years, the age of 65 has represented a symbolic point at which Americans envisioned hanging up their work boots and enjoying retirement. However, due to a series of gradual legislative changes, the Social Security system is moving the goalposts. Starting in 2025, individuals born in 1959 will reach full retirement age (FRA) at 66 years and 10 months. For everyone born in 1960 or later, the FRA will be a full 67 years. While this shift might appear minor, its financial effects are far from negligible, particularly for those considering retiring early.

These changes reflect long-term policy decisions intended to keep the Social Security system financially sustainable. Understanding how the adjustments impact benefits and creating a financial plan tailored to these evolving realities is crucial for ensuring a comfortable retirement.

Understanding the Adjustment to Full Retirement Age

The phased increase in the full retirement age can be traced back to the 1983 Social Security Amendments, which were designed to improve the program’s long-term viability. These amendments incrementally raised the FRA from the longstanding age of 65 to 67. The implementation has been gradual, increasing by two months for each birth year.

For example:

Those born in 1958 face an FRA of 66 years and 8 months
Individuals born in 1959 will reach FRA at 66 years and 10 months
Anyone born in 1960 or after will face an FRA of 67

Though people can start claiming Social Security as early as age 62, doing so comes with a permanent reduction in benefits. For those born in 1959, claiming benefits at 62 results in about a 29% decrease in monthly payments. The cut increases to 30% for those born in 1960 or later.

On the other hand, delaying benefits past FRA can result in an 8% annual boost, continuing until age 70. If you wait until then, you can receive up to 32% more each month. These numbers can significantly impact your long-term financial picture.

How to Handle the Income Gap Before Full Benefits

While many workers aim to retire before hitting FRA, doing so without careful planning can harm long-term financial health. Several strategies can help bridge the income gap from early retirement until full Social Security benefits become available.

One practical method is phased retirement. Instead of leaving the workforce entirely, you might negotiate a lighter schedule—working three or four days per week. Even working 15 to 20 hours weekly can help cover essential expenses and slow the depletion of your savings.

Another recommended approach is building a financial buffer. Experts advise saving enough to cover 18 to 24 months of living expenses in a high-yield savings or money market account. This safety net allows you to avoid dipping into long-term investments during volatile market periods.

Unused personal assets can also generate income. For instance, homeowners might consider renting out a spare room, potentially bringing in $700 to $1,000 per month. If you live in an urban area, leasing your driveway for parking could yield $150 to $300 per month.

There’s also the option of taking on a bridge job that offers both pay and benefits. Employers like Costco, Home Depot, and Trader Joe’s often hire part-time workers and provide health coverage for those working 20 to 28 hours weekly. These roles are especially attractive for early retirees looking for flexibility and medical benefits.

Making Withdrawals Work for You

If you retire before age 65 or delay claiming Social Security, your finances will depend heavily on personal savings. Using tax-efficient withdrawal strategies can minimize your tax burden and help your money go further.

One approach is to withdraw from taxable brokerage accounts first. This avoids early withdrawal penalties and allows retirement accounts to continue growing in a tax-advantaged environment.

You can also tap into Roth IRA contributions at any time without penalties or taxes, as long as you only withdraw the contributions and not the earnings. This provides an additional source of tax-free income.

Keeping your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) low is another valuable tactic. A lower MAGI can help you qualify for subsidies under the Affordable Care Act, which can dramatically reduce health insurance costs before you’re eligible for Medicare at age 65.

Generating Side Income Can Help Too

If you’re looking for extra income without the responsibilities of a full-time job, side gigs can offer flexibility and supplemental cash flow. Tutoring, for example, pays between $30 and $50 per hour and can be done on your schedule. Other options include pet sitting, dog walking, or selling crafts through platforms like Etsy.

Prepare for the Possibility of Future Policy Changes

Though the FRA currently caps at 67, ongoing discussions in Washington suggest it could rise further. Some proposals have floated the idea of increasing it to 68 or even 69, citing long-term funding concerns for the Social Security system. While these are not yet law, staying prepared for further changes is wise.

To stay ahead, build a plan that allows for delayed benefits if necessary. Emergency savings and alternative income sources offer greater financial flexibility. Regularly reviewing your retirement income plan will also help you adapt to any policy shifts.

Conclusion: Retirement on Your Own Terms

The gradual rise in Social Security’s full retirement age might seem like a bureaucratic detail, but for millions of Americans, it redefines when and how retirement can happen. Without planning, it can mean smaller monthly checks and more years of work. However, by strategically saving, leveraging assets, working part-time, and utilizing smart withdrawal tactics, you can take control of your financial future.

Retirement shouldn’t be defined by a government schedule. With a solid plan in place, you can retire when you’re ready—on your own terms.

By recognizing the impact of changing policies and preparing accordingly, you give yourself the freedom to shape your own retirement journey.

House Passes Bill to Deport Noncitizens Convicted of Drunk Driving

July 1, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, Cover, USA 0

The U.S. House of Representatives on Friday passed a bill that would mandate the deportation of noncitizens convicted of driving under the influence, according to a report by Breitbart. The legislation, titled the Jeremy and Angel Seay and Sergeant Brandon Mendoza Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act, was put forward by Representative Barry Moore, a Republican from Alabama. The bill is named in remembrance of victims who lost their lives due to accidents caused by intoxicated migrant drivers.

Representative Moore introduced the legislation to honor Jeremy and Angel Seay, a couple from his district, who were tragically killed when a noncitizen driving under the influence struck them while they were riding a motorcycle. Speaking to the Alabama Daily News, Moore said, “Their lives were cut short by the senseless act.” He added, “Tragedies like this are not uncommon across this country,” emphasizing the wider impact of such incidents involving impaired driving by noncitizens.

The bill has ignited a heated debate in Congress, receiving overwhelming support from Republican lawmakers. Most Republicans view the legislation as a necessary measure to safeguard American communities from individuals who repeatedly break laws and endanger lives through reckless behavior such as drunk driving. The bill aims to amend existing immigration policy by making DUI convictions grounds for mandatory deportation.

In contrast, 160 Democrats voted against the bill, raising concerns about the potential for overly broad enforcement and its implications for immigration justice. Opponents argue that while DUI offenses are serious, automatic deportation removes the opportunity for due process or context to be considered, especially for immigrants who may have lived in the U.S. for extended periods or have deep family and community ties.

Despite the partisan split, the legislation’s passage in the House marks a significant step in the ongoing political effort to link public safety and immigration enforcement. The bill now moves to the Senate, where its future remains uncertain, particularly given the different power dynamics and legislative priorities in that chamber.

Representative Moore, in advocating for the legislation, has highlighted personal tragedies such as those experienced by the Seay family to bring attention to what he sees as preventable deaths caused by lax immigration enforcement. By attaching specific names to the bill, including that of Sergeant Brandon Mendoza, a police officer killed in a similar incident, Moore is stressing the real-world consequences of policy gaps. Mendoza’s case, like that of the Seays, has become a symbol in political discussions about the intersection of immigration and criminal law.

“Their lives were cut short by the senseless act,” Moore repeated in statements to the press, underscoring the emotional weight behind the legislation. His remarks reflect a broader Republican viewpoint that public safety should take precedence in immigration decisions, especially when there is a criminal record involved.

The bill’s language stipulates that any noncitizen convicted of driving under the influence would be subject to mandatory removal from the United States. Supporters argue that the measure closes a loophole that allows dangerous individuals to remain in the country despite endangering others through impaired driving. Critics, however, caution that the legislation could lead to disproportionate punishment and may particularly impact certain immigrant communities more heavily than others.

Immigration rights groups and some Democratic lawmakers have expressed concerns that such legislation could further criminalize immigrant populations and erode trust between law enforcement and communities. They argue that while preventing DUI-related deaths is important, a one-size-fits-all deportation policy fails to take into account rehabilitation efforts, family situations, and other mitigating circumstances.

Still, proponents believe the law will serve as a deterrent to noncitizens who might otherwise engage in reckless behavior. By introducing automatic consequences for DUI convictions, supporters contend that the law strengthens both immigration policy and public safety.

The bill’s naming after specific victims adds a human face to what is otherwise a policy discussion, which may help in gaining public support. The use of personal stories has become a common legislative strategy to create empathy and urgency around specific issues, and Moore’s bill is a prominent example.

While the political divide on immigration-related bills continues to grow, this legislation’s focus on DUI offenses could garner some bipartisan interest in the Senate, especially among lawmakers who prioritize public safety. However, it is expected that the bill will face stronger opposition in the Senate, where Democratic control and a more moderate stance on immigration issues could result in amendments or outright rejection.

For now, the bill’s approval in the House reflects a broader Republican push to tighten immigration enforcement and prioritize citizen safety, especially in cases involving criminal behavior. Whether or not this bill becomes law, it has already sparked a national conversation about how the U.S. should handle immigration enforcement in cases involving criminal activity, and how policy can be crafted to prevent further tragedies like those that took the lives of Jeremy and Angel Seay.

With its passage, the House has signaled its stance on the matter, placing the burden of next steps on the Senate. If the bill passes there, it could significantly alter how DUI offenses are treated in the context of immigration law, potentially impacting thousands of noncitizens across the country.

Until then, the debate over balancing compassion in immigration policy with accountability for criminal conduct is likely to continue, both in Congress and among the American public.

Discovery of TOI-1452 b: A Possible Ocean World Just 100 Light-Years from Earth Sparks Scientific Excitement

July 1, 2025 Staff ReporterScience, Cover, World 0

A remarkable exoplanet located merely 100 light-years away from Earth has caught the attention of the astronomical community. Identified as TOI-1452 b, this celestial body is not just another planet outside our solar system—it might be the first documented “ocean planet.” Scientists believe that up to 30% of this planet could be covered in water. The potential presence of such a large amount of water on a distant planet is stirring conversations about the possibility of life beyond Earth.

What makes this finding even more intriguing is the apparent contradiction between the planet’s physical characteristics and current scientific understanding. TOI-1452 b orbits a star in a zone where prevailing theories in physics and chemistry suggest that liquid water shouldn’t be able to exist. Despite this, all available data points to the possible presence of vast water reserves. As one researcher observed, “The unthinkable seems real: TOI-1452 b challenges everything we thought we knew about exoplanets!”

This potentially groundbreaking discovery has prompted many scientists to label TOI-1452 b as a kind of cosmic cousin to Earth, albeit a more distant and significantly larger one. In terms of physical features, this exoplanet has an ideal combination of properties that set it apart: low density, a balanced temperature based on the energy it receives from its star, and a substantial size.

Initial scientific assessments hint that the planet might be composed of layers of water or ice, possibly resembling the hidden subsurface oceans found on some of our solar system’s moons, such as Ganymede and Enceladus. Located in the Draco constellation, TOI-1452 b is also perfectly positioned for detailed study by the James Webb Space Telescope. The telescope is already being readied to analyze the planet’s atmosphere for any indicators of habitability—or even signs of life.

From a classification standpoint, TOI-1452 b qualifies as a “super-Earth.” Although the term may sound dramatic, it simply refers to a type of rocky planet that is larger than Earth but smaller than the gas giants such as Neptune or Jupiter. With a diameter 70% greater than Earth’s and a mass approximately five times larger, it certainly earns this designation.

What really piqued scientists’ interest was the planet’s density. Based on the numbers, something didn’t quite add up. A planet of that size and mass should be composed primarily of rock or metal, but the relatively low density pointed to another possibility. “Was it a bird? A plane? No! Water!” one scientist quipped, highlighting their conclusion that the most plausible explanation for the low density is a substantial water composition. The presence of such a significant amount of water would also explain how the planet could support potentially habitable conditions, despite its closeness to its host star.

Indeed, TOI-1452 b orbits its star in just 11 Earth days, indicating that it lies very close to the star. Under normal circumstances, a planet in such proximity would be far too hot to support liquid water. However, TOI-1452 b’s host star is not a sun-like star. It is a red dwarf, significantly smaller and cooler than our Sun. This difference may allow the planet to retain moderate temperatures, potentially supporting water in its liquid state. “Isn’t it incredible?” the article exclaims, reflecting widespread astonishment in the scientific community.

To uncover more about this strange world, all eyes are now on the James Webb Space Telescope. The plan is to analyze the exoplanet’s atmosphere as it transits across the face of its star. This method allows researchers to detect specific gases, such as water vapor or hydrogen, in the planet’s atmosphere. Scientists are even optimistic about the possibility of detecting organic molecules—biosignatures that could indicate the presence of life. Are we witnessing the first step toward discovering life beyond Earth?

The label “water world” is not given lightly. While the presence of water on TOI-1452 b has not yet been directly confirmed, the planet exhibits more Earth-like features than any previously discovered exoplanet. That alone makes it a strong candidate for the first confirmed water-covered planet outside our solar system. “We can say that TOI-1452 b is emerging as the planet with the most characteristics similar to Earth,” notes the report.

The broader scientific mission remains focused on understanding how planetary systems form and evolve. However, discoveries like TOI-1452 b inevitably turn the discussion toward the age-old question of life beyond Earth. Based on what is currently known, it’s conceivable that TOI-1452 b could support life in ways similar to Earth. Although, as the article humorously suggests, “maybe they’re not as conflictive as us humans.”

One of the most exciting implications of this discovery is what it suggests about the prevalence of habitable planets in our galaxy. If a planet so close to its star can sustain large quantities of water, perhaps the criteria scientists use to define “habitable zones” have been too narrow. Without a doubt, what stands out most about this discovery is that, if a planet so close to its star can have large amounts of water, we may have underestimated the number of habitable worlds in our galaxy!

In essence, TOI-1452 b may be more than just an exciting discovery. It could mark a turning point in the search for extraterrestrial life, redefining what scientists look for when evaluating whether a planet might support life. As technology advances and more exoplanets like this are observed, the chances of finding a truly Earth-like world—or even alien life—continue to grow.

Sanjyot Dunung Enters Illinois Congressional Race to Reclaim the American Dream with Pragmatic Leadership

June 29, 2025July 1, 2025 Ajay GhoshProfile, USA 0

Sanjyot Dunung, a Des Plaines-based entrepreneur, civic leader, and mother of three sons—including one serving in the military—has launched her campaign for Congress in Illinois’s 8th District. A Democrat and first-time candidate, Dunung is positioning herself as a commonsense alternative to career politicians, bringing with her decades of experience in business, education, and global policy. Her campaign is centered on restoring the American Dream through practical reforms, economic innovation, and deeply rooted community values.

“I’m a small business owner and proud mother of three sons, including one in the military,” Dunung announced in her campaign video. “In a time of real chaos and frustration with the status quo, I am the change candidate stepping up to fight for the American Dream and put people over politics.”

Born in India and immigrated to the US at age 6, raised in Des Plaines, Illinois, Dunung’s personal story is tightly woven into the community she now seeks to represent. Her family initially lived with friends until they could afford their own apartment, and her parents’ tireless work ethic inspired her own sense of responsibility. By age nine, she was babysitting; by ten, she had turned that into a weekend childcare business. “I was born in India, but I was made in America,” she stated. “This community gave me a chance.”

Her work ethic carried into her college years at Northwestern University, where she juggled studies with a daily paper route. As an adult, she balanced the demands of single motherhood, running a small business, and caring for her ailing parents. These life experiences have given her firsthand insight into the everyday struggles facing working families. “My life was Made in America. This campaign was Made in America. It could not have happened anywhere else,” she declared. “Now, I’m committed to making sure that the same American Dream is alive and well now, and for generations to come.”

Dunung is the founder and CEO of Atma Global, an EdTech company that creates learning solutions for businesses and public institutions. She has authored 17 books, including textbooks on international business and a young adult novel titled “Maddie & Sayara.” Her career has been defined by building—companies, jobs, ideas—and by solving real-world problems with creativity and collaboration.

“I’m running to protect Social Security and Medicare for the next generation, honor our commitment to military families and veterans, ensure healthcare is affordable and accessible, fight for reproductive freedoms, invest in educational opportunities from universal Pre-K to vocational training, harness the American entrepreneurial spirit, and make homeownership and retirement achievable, not aspirational,” she said.

Her campaign reflects her deep concerns of what she sees as ineffective governance. “This administration promised to fix the economy, but instead, it’s breaking promises and tearing down opportunities that make the American Dream possible,” she emphasized. For Dunung, this campaign isn’t just about policy—it’s about practicality. She wants the government to function more efficiently and dynamically for 21st-century needs without cutting the essential programs families rely on.

She brings a wide array of experience to her candidacy. Dunung serves on the Board of Directors of the National Small Business Association, the Truman Center for National Policy, and the American Leadership Project. She was also a member of President Joe Biden’s Foreign Policy Working Group focused on international trade, where she worked to strengthen U.S. small business exports and expand fair trade relationships.

Dunung’s economic views are grounded in her business acumen and policy experience. She has been critical of past and current administrations for their approaches to trade and manufacturing. “The Trump administration asked the right questions—how do we make trade fairer and how do we revitalize manufacturing—but their solutions were all wrong,” she said. “We don’t need to crash the economy in order to fix it. We don’t need to just arbitrarily levy tariffs and hostile policies on countries that are our friends and allies.”

She also took issue with what she sees as the current administration’s abandonment of strategic industrial policies, citing the CHIPS Act under Biden as an important but neglected investment. “You can’t just say you want manufacturing; you have to invest in both learning—from K through 12 to vocational training—and help businesses of all sizes to be able to do that,” she explained.

Dunung is especially focused on workforce development. She wants to ensure that as manufacturing evolves, Americans are equipped to meet new demands. “What might have taken 20 people once to do a manufacturing process now may take five, but those five need to be highly skilled at an AI-driven manufacturing process,” she said. “We need to rethink the training and education to make sure that we give everybody a fair chance at good-paying jobs for the future.”

Her views on immigration also align with her broader economic vision. “We have a declining birth rate. It’s 1.6, and we need to replenish at 2.2,” she said. “We need the immigration system to be fair, transparent, and legal. But our secret sauce as a country is immigrants. We bring work ethic, know-how, and South Asian immigrants fuel technology. We need to champion them.”

As part of her early campaign momentum, Dunung has earned notable endorsements and media recognition. She was recently endorsed by ASPIRE PAC, the political arm of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus. “Sanjyot Dunung is committed to building a future that is more affordable, safer, and healthier for all Americans,” said ASPIRE PAC Chair Rep. Marilyn Strickland. “She understands the issues that matter to our communities—from lowering costs to protecting our democracy—and is focused on commonsense solutions that will help working families get ahead.”

Dunung responded, “As a proud Asian American, I am honored to receive ASPIRE PAC’s endorsement. My experiences as an Indian-born, American-made small business owner, single mom, and civic leader inform everything I do.”

She has also been highlighted by Roll Call, which described her as “the candidate for commonsense change across parties,” a recognition she says validates her ability to win a five-way race in a district she knows intimately. Additionally, she was featured in the Northwestern University newspaper as a local alumna running for office, underscoring her strong educational and community ties.

Dunung joins a growing list of candidates competing for the seat soon to be vacated by Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, who is running for the U.S. Senate. Other Democratic candidates include Cook County Commissioner Kevin Morrison, Hanover Park Trustee Yasmeen Bankole, and brand executive Christ Kallas. Business owner Mark Rice, a Republican, has also filed to run.

Despite the crowded field, Dunung believes her unique blend of business, policy, and lived experience makes her stand out. “I’m not beholden to special interests. I’m really about being focused on results,” she said. “Everybody talks about needing change, but they want responsible, methodical change. We can improve how the government works. We can get efficiencies. We can get rid of waste. But the way to do it is not with a chainsaw and not overnight by crashing agencies.”

She emphasizes the importance of community-based leadership. “I grew up in this community. I graduated from high school, went to Northwestern. During the last 10 years, I’ve been taking care of my aging parents,” she said. “I’ve walked the talk and I’ve lived the experience that for many people is their daily life.”

Dunung also recognizes the significance of representation in government. “We only have six South Asians in Congress, and only one is a woman. We need to do better. And we can only do better together as a community,” she said. “People from the South Asian community need to get involved to understand how to support folks who align with their views and their values.”

With the Democratic primary set for March 17, 2026, and the general election scheduled for November 3, 2026, Dunung is campaigning hard across the district, which includes areas of Cook, DuPage, and Kane Counties, as well as cities like St. Charles and Geneva. The district also includes St. Charles, South Barrington Schaumburg, and Des Plaines, among others. As she connects with voters on the campaign trail, her message remains clear and consistent: responsible government, inclusive opportunity, and long-term investment in people. “We need to lean on the things that have always made America great: freedom, opportunity…and each other,” she said. “By thinking anew and not being afraid to listen and work with anyone, regardless of party, we can get it done for America.”

Dunung’s candidacy is not just a campaign—it’s a story of determination, resilience, and community-driven leadership. For voters in Illinois’s 8th District, she offers a vision rooted in reality and guided by purpose.

To know more about Sanjyot Dunung and support her camdidacy, please visit:
www.SanjyotForCongress.com. Support: https://secure.actblue.com/donate/sml.rol

Rotary Youth from India Team Up with Dr. V.K. Raju to Combat Childhood Blindness

June 29, 2025July 1, 2025 Ajay GhoshHealth, Youth 0

Rotary’s youth members are joining forces with the globally renowned visionary Dr. V.K. Raju, founder of the Eye Foundation of America (EFA), in a profound mission to eradicate childhood blindness. On June 14, 2025, an inspiring gathering took place at the India International Centre in New Delhi, where a dynamic group of Rotaractors and Interactors expressed their unwavering commitment to carrying forward Dr. Raju’s vision of a “world without childhood blindness.” This event marked a significant step in creating intergenerational partnerships for global health equity.

Uniting Passionate Youth Leaders

The event brought together remarkable youth leaders from Rotary’s youth wings, namely Rotaract and Interact clubs. These young changemakers actively contribute to their communities, addressing pressing health and development challenges in alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Key participants in this impactful dialogue included:

· Rotaractor Saacchi Saxena: President of the Rotaract Club of World Without Childhood Blindness and an EFA Youth Ambassador.

· Rotaractor-Rotarian Poorvi Sahai: EFA Ambassador and mentor to the younger generation.

· Interactor Sabyaa Saxena: Immediate Past President of the SDG Community Interact Club and an EFA Young Ambassador.

· Interactor Kaashvi: Current President of the SDG Community Interact Club.

· Interactors Ruhaan and Apal: Student volunteers directly engaged in school-based vision screening campaigns.

These youth leaders, with their passion and dedication, demonstrated how grassroots engagement and collaborative initiatives could serve as the driving force for global change.

The Global Challenge of Childhood Blindness

Childhood blindness remains a significant global health challenge with far-reaching consequences. Dr. Raju highlighted some alarming statistics during his address. For example, three-fourths of children with visual impairments never have the opportunity to attend school. Blindness also significantly reduces employability by up to 50%, which perpetuates cycles of poverty and social isolation.

Dr. Raju specifically drew attention to the situation in India, where approximately 3.5 million premature babies are born annually. Among them, nearly one in six—equivalent to 600,000 infants—are born at less than 32 weeks of gestational age. Of these, about 40% receive neonatal care, and 80% survive, leaving over 200,000 children vulnerable to developing Retinopathy of Prematurity, a preventable cause of childhood blindness.

Strategies and Innovations to Address the Issue

The discussions at the event revolved around scaling the mission of eliminating childhood blindness through grassroots activism, awareness campaigns, and innovative approaches. Some of the key strategies discussed included:

· School-Based Awareness Drives: Empowering students to lead vision screening and educational initiatives within their schools and communities.

· Community Screening Campaigns: Conducting local eye health check-ups to identify and address preventable causes of blindness.

· Technology-Driven Solutions: Leveraging modern tools and digital platforms to enhance the reach and effectiveness of eye care services.

Dr. Raju emphasized the transformative role that Rotary Fellowships could play in building a global network of youth-led initiatives to advance eye health. He shared insights from his vast global experience, illustrating the tangible impact of cohesive action between local and international stakeholders.

Milestones and Future Plans

The meeting also featured several exciting announcements that underscored the commitment of Rotary youth and the Eye Foundation of America:

· Launch of Vision Ambassador Chapters: Schools and colleges will establish these chapters, led by Interactors and Rotaractors, to promote eye health and engage young people in advocacy efforts.

· Global EFA Youth Fellowship: This fellowship will provide training and mentorship to young leaders interested in eye care and public health advocacy.

· #SeeTheFuture Campaign: A powerful youth-led social media movement aimed at raising awareness about childhood blindness and mobilizing global support for the cause.

· Global Vision Summit: Scheduled for January 31, 2027, in New York, this summit will coincide with the proposed International Day for a World Without Childhood Blindness. It will serve as a platform for international dialogue and collaboration.

Each of these milestones represents a concerted effort to institutionalize youth leadership in the fight against childhood blindness while fostering a culture of empathy and action.

Inspiring Words from Dr. Raju

Dr. Raju expressed profound gratitude and admiration for the youth participants, describing them as the leaders of today, not just tomorrow. “If we equip our youth with empathy, purpose, and tools—there is no mission too big, no blindness too deep,” he said. His words resonated deeply with everyone present, reinforcing the belief that young people hold the power to shape a brighter, healthier future.

The event concluded with the signing of a symbolic Charter of Commitments, which outlined the roadmap for future collaborations between Rotary youth clubs, the Eye Foundation of America, and local vision care partners. This charter highlighted the shared goals of preventing childhood blindness, ensuring equitable access to eye care, and empowering every child to see the world clearly.

The collaboration between Rotary youth and Dr. V.K. Raju exemplifies how intergenerational partnerships can address critical global health challenges. By empowering young leaders, fostering innovation, and building alliances, the movement to eradicate childhood blindness is gaining momentum. This monumental effort serves as a testament to the power of compassion, determination, and collective action in shaping a world where every child can see a brighter future.

About the Eye Foundation of America

Founded by Dr. V.K. Raju, the Eye Foundation of America is a global non-profit organization dedicated to preventing blindness through service, education, and research. Over the years, EFA has impacted millions of lives across India, Africa, the UK, and the United States by delivering high-quality eye care in underserved regions. The foundation remains committed to its mission of creating a world where no child suffers from preventable blindness.

Join the Movement

Dr. Raju passionately called on individuals and organizations to join this noble mission. “Together, let us illuminate young lives and create a world without childhood blindness. Your support can change lives, restore vision, and empower futures,” he urged. “Now, let’s all be part of something extraordinary.”

For those interested in contributing to this remarkable initiative, more information is available at [www.eyefoundationofamerica.org](URL) or via email at info@eyefoundationofamerica.org.

Wealth Gap Widens as World’s Richest 1% Control 43% of Global Assets, Says Oxfam

June 29, 2025July 1, 2025 Staff ReporterMoney 0

The wealthiest 1% of the global population now possess an astonishing 43% of the world’s total assets, with their wealth growing by almost $34 trillion over the past ten years, according to a new analysis by Oxfam International. This sharp rise in private wealth stands in stark contrast to the alarming decline in public wealth and development aid, which the report argues is fueling global poverty and inequality.

Oxfam released its report titled “From Private Profit to Public Power: Financing Development, Not Oligarchy” ahead of the International Conference on Financing for Development scheduled for June 30. The conference, hosted by Spain and attended by representatives from more than 190 countries, will focus on strategies to address the growing inequality in wealth distribution.

The Oxfam analysis draws attention to a troubling global trend: while private wealth continues to surge, public wealth has been consistently shrinking. The implications for the world’s poorest are severe, especially for the 3.7 billion people currently living in poverty.

The report underscores the extent to which inequality has derailed global development. Since 2015, the world’s wealthiest individuals have increased their fortunes by $33.9 trillion. Oxfam states that the combined wealth of just 3,000 billionaires now represents 14.6% of the global GDP. At the same time, the richest 1% hold nearly half—specifically, 43%—of the world’s total assets.

Oxfam’s findings indicate a stark disparity in the growth of private and public wealth. From 1995 to 2023, private wealth surged by $342 trillion, a figure that is eight times higher than the $44 trillion growth in public wealth during the same period. This widening gap is not just a statistic; it highlights a structural problem where public wealth, as a share of total global wealth, has actually declined over the years.

Further complicating the issue is the role of wealthy nations, which Oxfam criticizes for retreating from their responsibilities. The organization notes that affluent countries have slashed critical development aid more drastically in the past decade than at any time since 1960. The G7 nations—comprising Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States—are particularly culpable, as they collectively provide three-quarters of all international aid. Yet these same countries are planning to reduce their aid contributions by 28% in 2026 compared to levels in 2024.

As rich countries pull back on aid, poorer nations are plunging deeper into debt. Oxfam reports that 60% of low-income countries are now spending more on debt repayments than they are on essential public services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure. This dynamic leaves them even less equipped to tackle poverty, inequality, and economic instability.

Meanwhile, the world’s wealthiest individuals continue to consolidate their fortunes. According to Forbes, nine of the ten richest people on Earth are Americans. The list includes Elon Musk, Larry Ellison, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett, Larry Page, Steve Ballmer, Sergey Brin, and Jensen Huang. The only non-American in the top ten is Bernard Arnault and his family from France.

The current state of global inequality threatens the very goals that world leaders committed to a decade ago. In 2015, countries around the globe endorsed the Addis Ababa Action Agenda—a comprehensive framework for financing sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, Oxfam warns that these goals are failing. Only 16% of the agreed-upon targets are on track to be achieved by the 2030 deadline.

Oxfam International’s Executive Director, Amitabh Behar, criticized the dominance of private wealth in shaping global development, pointing out that the interests of a few are being prioritized over the needs of the majority. “There is glaring evidence that global development is desperately failing because – as the last decade shows – the interests of a very wealthy few are put over those of everyone else,” Behar said.

Behar added that rich countries are favoring corporate and financial elites over public welfare systems. “Rich countries have put Wall Street in the driver’s seat of global development. It’s a global private finance takeover which has overrun the evidence-backed ways to tackle poverty through public investments and fair taxation. It is no wonder governments are abysmally off track, be it on fostering decent jobs, gender equality, or ending hunger. This wealth concentration is choking efforts to end poverty”, he said.

The consequences of this inequality are not abstract. They affect real lives. More than 3.7 billion people worldwide live in poverty, and over 700 million are experiencing hunger. These numbers are likely to worsen with ongoing cuts in aid and development support. According to the Oxfam report, reductions in international aid could result in 2.9 million more deaths by 2030 due to causes related to HIV/AIDS alone.

The report appeals to citizens and policymakers alike to take action. It urges governments to support transformative policies that confront extreme inequality head-on and reshape the way development is financed. Behar emphasized the importance of taxing the ultra-wealthy and redirecting resources toward public services. “Trillions of dollars exist to meet the global goals, but they’re locked away in private accounts of the ultra-wealthy. It’s time we rejected the Wall Street consensus and instead put the public in the driving seat. Governments should heed widespread demands to tax the rich – and match it with a vision to build public goods from healthcare to energy. It’s a hopeful sign that some governments are banding together to fight inequality – more should follow their lead,” Behar added.

The Oxfam report concludes with a powerful message: solving global poverty is not a question of whether the world has enough resources. Rather, it’s a matter of political will and economic priorities. The wealth required to address global inequality and achieve the 2030 sustainable development goals already exists—it is simply not being shared.

By presenting these findings ahead of the International Conference on Financing for Development, Oxfam hopes to influence global leaders to move away from profit-driven models and invest in policies that serve the public good. If current trends continue, the organization warns, the gap between the richest and the rest of humanity will only widen, making it increasingly difficult to achieve a just and equitable world.

Trump’s Sweeping Agenda Bill Clears Initial Senate Hurdle Amid GOP Fractures

June 29, 2025July 1, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

A sweeping legislative package reflecting former President Donald Trump’s policy vision narrowly advanced in the Senate, overcoming internal Republican dissent and late-night wrangling. Despite opposition from key GOP senators over Medicaid cuts and debt concerns, the bill gained enough support to move forward, setting the stage for intense debate and a possible July 4 final vote.

In a dramatic turn of events on Capitol Hill, Senate Republicans narrowly pushed forward a massive legislative package championed by former President Donald Trump, despite public resistance from members within their own ranks. The 1,000-page bill — a centerpiece of Trump’s revived domestic agenda — cleared its first procedural vote late Saturday, overcoming internal turbulence and a tense standoff that tested GOP unity.

Two Republican senators, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, broke ranks and opposed the measure. Paul voiced sharp objections to the bill’s proposed $5 trillion debt ceiling hike, while Tillis cited a projected $38.9 billion cut to Medicaid funds in his home state, warning of devastating consequences for hospitals and rural communities.

The measure, which includes $160 billion for border security, $150 billion in defense spending, and sweeping tax reforms, teetered on the edge of collapse as GOP leaders scrambled to secure votes. The drama unfolded in real time on the Senate floor, where Senate Minority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), flanked by top Republicans, anxiously awaited key votes from skeptical colleagues.

Senators Mike Lee, Rick Scott, and Cynthia Lummis eventually cast their votes in favor after closed-door negotiations, with Senator Ron Johnson switching from “no” to “yes” under mounting pressure. Their support came after Vice President J.D. Vance and party leaders engaged in last-minute talks behind closed doors, culminating in a late-night walk to the chamber that clinched the advancement.

One of the most contentious points came earlier in the week when the Senate parliamentarian struck down a key Medicaid tax provision for violating the Byrd Rule. Republican leaders hastily rewrote the section to comply with Senate rules. Another flashpoint emerged just hours before the vote, when freshman Senator Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) threatened to oppose the bill over a clause requiring the sale of public lands. Party leaders diffused the crisis by promising him a vote on an amendment to remove the language.

Despite these efforts, criticism from both sides of the aisle remains fierce. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) lambasted Republicans for dropping a nearly 1,000-page substitute amendment late Friday, leaving senators little time for review. He accused the GOP of hiding the bill’s true fiscal impact, stating, “They’re afraid to show how badly this will increase the deficit.”

Schumer cited a preliminary Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate indicating the legislation would slash Medicaid by $930 billion, a far deeper cut than the House-passed version. “It’s worse on health care, worse on SNAP, worse on the deficit,” he declared, vowing resistance.

Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine), often a pivotal swing vote, offered tentative support for moving the bill forward but made clear she’s not yet on board for final passage. “There are positive changes, but I still want to see further revisions,” she told reporters, adding that she plans to propose several amendments.

Outside the chamber, the proposal also drew backlash from high-profile figures like Elon Musk, who denounced the bill as a backward-looking handout. “It’s full of giveaways to fossil fuel industries and will kill millions of jobs,” Musk posted on X, formerly Twitter.

In a procedural twist, Schumer warned that if the bill proceeded, he would invoke a time-consuming tactic to have the entire bill read aloud on the Senate floor — a move that could delay debate for up to 12 hours and test the stamina of both clerks and lawmakers ahead of a lengthy series of amendment votes, colloquially known as vote-a-rama.

With a July 4 deadline set by President Trump for final passage, the legislation now heads into what promises to be a grueling final stretch. While Thune celebrated the initial advancement as a “once-in-a-generation opportunity,” deep divisions within the GOP and fierce Democratic resistance signal that the road ahead will be anything but smooth.

Trump Wins 2024 Election with Broader Coalition and First Popular Vote Victory

June 28, 2025July 1, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

In his third bid for the presidency, Donald Trump clinched a decisive victory over Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. Not only did he secure 312 Electoral College votes, but for the first time, he also won the national popular vote, defeating Harris by 1.5 percentage points. His success was fueled by a more diverse voter coalition compared to his earlier campaigns, as outlined in a new Pew Research Center study examining the 2024 electorate.

Among Latino voters, Trump made significant inroads, narrowing the gap considerably. While Joe Biden had defeated him among Hispanics by a wide margin in 2020 (61% to 36%), the 2024 figures were much closer, with Harris winning 51% and Trump securing 48%. This nearly even split suggests Trump made notable progress with this key demographic.

Black voter support for Trump also increased substantially. In 2020, he received just 8% of the Black vote. By 2024, that figure had climbed to 15%. Although Harris maintained majority support among Black Americans, the shift toward Trump signals an important change in voting behavior.

Asian American voters showed similar trends. While Harris earned the support of 57% of Asian voters, Trump won 40%. In comparison, Biden had captured 70% of the Asian vote in 2020, with Trump garnering only 30%. The narrowed margin in 2024 indicates Trump’s growing appeal among this group as well.

According to Pew, these shifts were mainly due to changes in voter turnout between 2020 and 2024 rather than widespread switching of party loyalty. Most voters stuck with the party they supported in the previous election. However, Trump gained from increased turnout among his 2020 supporters and an edge among new voters who did not participate in the 2020 election. This new voter group was significantly more diverse than those who voted in both years.

Despite Trump’s improved performance among various groups, many of the entrenched voting patterns that have characterized American politics for decades persisted. One of the most prominent was the divide in educational attainment. Trump continued to dominate among voters without a four-year college degree, widening his advantage to 14 percentage points (56% to 42%), double the margin he achieved in 2016. In contrast, Harris outperformed Trump among college-educated voters, winning 57% to his 41%. However, her lead was smaller than Biden’s margin in 2020.

The urban-rural divide also deepened. Trump captured rural voters by a massive 40-point margin, with 69% of rural residents backing him compared to just 29% for Harris. Meanwhile, voters in urban areas largely supported Harris, with 65% favoring her and 33% choosing Trump.

Religion continued to influence voter behavior. Pew found that nearly two-thirds of Americans who attend religious services at least monthly (64%) voted for Trump. In contrast, Harris was favored by 56% of those who attend services less frequently, while 43% of that group chose Trump.

Voter retention and turnout differences also played a critical role in Trump’s win. A larger portion of Trump’s 2020 supporters (89%) turned out again in 2024, compared to 85% of Biden’s 2020 voters. Additionally, among those who didn’t vote in 2020 but did in 2024, 54% supported Trump, while 42% voted for Harris.

Between the two elections, voter loyalty held steady for most. “About 85% of those who backed Trump in 2020 did so again in 2024,” Pew reported. Only 11% of his previous supporters did not vote in 2024, and 4% switched sides or supported another candidate. Harris retained the backing of 79% of Biden’s 2020 voters, but a slightly higher 15% of them didn’t vote, and 6% either chose Trump or someone else.

New and returning voters – those who had been eligible in 2020 but didn’t vote – also leaned toward Trump when they participated in 2024. Among this group, which includes those who were too young to vote in 2020, 14% voted for Trump and 12% for Harris. This indicates a modest advantage for Trump among first-time or returning voters.

Overall, voting behavior between 2020 and 2024 showed both consistency and change. About 75% of eligible adults repeated their 2020 behavior – either voting for the same party or sitting out both elections. The remaining quarter changed course by switching party allegiance, voting in 2024 after not voting in 2020, or abstaining in 2024 after voting in the previous election.

Despite the high stakes, Harris might not have gained significantly from a broader turnout. When Pew asked nonvoters how they would have voted, responses were nearly even: 44% said they would have backed Trump, while 40% said Harris. This contrasts with 2020, when nonvoters showed a clear preference for Biden over Trump (46% to 35%).

This suggests that even with full voter participation in 2024, the final result likely wouldn’t have changed much. Pew noted that in 2020, a full turnout would likely have increased Biden’s margin of victory, unlike in 2024 when the nonvoter pool leaned more evenly between both parties. “Democrats have held an edge among nonvoters in prior elections dating back to at least the 1960s,” Pew stated, “though there is some evidence this advantage had declined in recent elections.”

Among naturalized citizens – immigrants who have become U.S. citizens – support was nearly split. Harris won 51% of their votes, while Trump captured 47%. This marked a significant shift from 2020, when Biden had led this group by 21 points (59% to 38%). In the 2024 electorate, naturalized citizens accounted for 9% of all voters.

Trump also gained ground with male voters, especially younger men. Men overall favored Trump by a 12-point margin (55% to 43%), a notable increase from 2020 when the gender divide was narrower. Among men under 50, the race was nearly even in 2024, with 49% supporting Trump and 48% backing Harris. In 2020, this group had favored Biden by 10 points (53% to 43%).

Despite historically high voter engagement in recent elections, many Americans remain disengaged. The 2024 turnout rate stood at 64%, the second-highest since 1960, trailing only the 2020 turnout. Still, about 26% of eligible voters had no record of voting in any of the last three national elections. These nonparticipants were disproportionately younger and less likely to have college degrees than consistent voters.

Another notable development was the growth in early in-person voting. In 2024, 32% of voters cast their ballots in person before Election Day, up from 27% in 2020. Meanwhile, 34% voted in person on Election Day itself.

Pew’s analysis paints a complex picture of the 2024 election: while traditional voting patterns held firm in many areas, Trump’s outreach to more diverse demographics, combined with targeted voter turnout strategies, enabled him to secure a broader coalition and his first-ever win in the national popular vote.

India Turns Crisis into Opportunity by Boosting Defense Amid Middle East Conflict

June 28, 2025July 1, 2025 Staff ReporterEconomy, Nation 0

India’s economy faced a precarious situation over the past week as geopolitical tensions between Israel and Iran threatened to escalate further. The nation stood at the edge of a potential economic crisis, but rather than being dragged into turmoil, India found a strategic opportunity in the unfolding events to enhance its domestic defense sector.

The conflict, which had global ramifications, culminated in a ceasefire agreement on Wednesday. This truce followed a U.S.-led bombing campaign that, according to President Donald Trump, eliminated Iran’s nuclear capabilities. The ceasefire brought some relief to global markets, leading to a drop in oil prices that had surged amid the conflict. With this development, India narrowly avoided a potential economic disaster, but the situation underscored the country’s dependence on foreign oil and its vulnerability to external shocks.

Although India stopped purchasing Iranian oil some time ago, it still relies heavily on oil transported through the Strait of Hormuz. Approximately 40% of its crude oil imports pass through this narrow and strategically crucial maritime route. Any disruption here would have resulted in significant economic consequences.

According to a report from SBI Research, every $10 increase in global crude oil prices could push up consumer price inflation in India by as much as 35 basis points and reduce GDP growth by 30 basis points. Madan Sabnavis, the chief economist at Bank of Baroda, emphasized the implications of such a price surge. While he noted that a 10% rise in oil prices might be manageable, he warned, “A sustained price above $100 per barrel can have a major impact.”

India also faces a complex diplomatic situation. On one hand, it has strategic investments in Iran, including the Chabahar port project which is managed by Indian companies. On the other, it shares a close defense relationship with Israel. This dual engagement presents a challenge as India seeks to maintain strong ties with both nations amid ongoing tensions.

The scale of India’s defense ties with Israel is significant. According to a March 2024 report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, India is Israel’s largest arms buyer, accounting for 34% of its total defense exports. In return, Israel contributes 13% of India’s arms imports.

This dependency on foreign arms was starkly visible during India’s recent military action dubbed “Operation Sindoor,” launched in retaliation to an April militant attack in Jammu and Kashmir. The operation combined older Russian equipment with modern Israeli systems like the Heron drones and Spyder and Barak-8 missile systems. Analysts at investment bank Jefferies highlighted this operation as evidence of India’s ongoing reliance on imported military technology.

India’s traditional defense partner, Russia, has become an increasingly unreliable supplier. Following the invasion of Ukraine, Russian military production has shifted toward meeting its own wartime needs, resulting in delays for countries like India. Furthermore, there are questions about the effectiveness of Russian military hardware. For example, equipment such as the T-90S tanks—widely used by the Indian Army—has reportedly not performed well in Ukraine, according to defense analysts.

In light of these developments, India recognizes the urgent need to pivot toward a more self-reliant defense strategy. However, making this transition won’t be easy or quick. Bernstein Research notes that as of 2023, about 90% of India’s armored vehicles and 70% of its combat aircraft were of Russian origin. Diversifying and localizing such a significant portion of defense infrastructure will take considerable time and resources.

Still, global developments are pushing India and other nations in the same direction. Anna Mulholland, head of emerging market equities research at Pictet Asset Management, observed, “I think undoubtedly the situation will have increased the desire and conviction that all the countries have to increase their defence spending, which was initiated because of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.” She added, “The Middle East turmoil, while not new, will surely have increased people’s resolve and commitment to those increased defence budgets that have been spoken about.”

India is attempting to transform this crisis into a strategic opening for its domestic defense industry. JPMorgan analysts described the current geopolitical climate as a “pivotal moment for widespread recognition of BEL’s capabilities.” BEL, or Bharat Electronics Limited, is a state-owned company that has seen its stock price rise roughly 38% this year.

Atul Tiwari, an executive director at JPMorgan, commented in a June 23 client note, “A steady stream of orders, elevated geopolitical risks both in India and globally, and strong medium-term growth prospects … with healthy [return on equity] should continue to lead to outperformance, in our view.”

One of the most prominent signs of India’s commitment to defense self-sufficiency is “Project Kusha,” a domestically developed alternative to the Russian S-400 air defense system. BEL plays a central role in this initiative. Tiwari added that the program “is expected to contribute significantly to the company’s long-term order book once contracts are finalized.”

India is not only investing in defense for its own needs but also aims to become a global exporter in this sector. According to Jefferies, the country is targeting a doubling of its defense exports to nearly $6 billion annually by the end of this decade.

Meanwhile, in the financial sector, the tentative ceasefire between Iran and Israel brought temporary relief. Dhiraj Nim of ANZ stated that although the spike in global oil prices poses risks for the Indian rupee, the truce “has helped stabilize investor sentiment and improved near-term outlook for the currency.”

Economists like Frederic Neumann of HSBC and Tim Seymour of Seymour Asset Management believe that emerging markets, particularly Korea, India, and Vietnam, remain undervalued and present attractive investment opportunities.

In other developments, Proseus, a major tech investor, projected that India will soon produce a $100 billion technology company. Proseus has backed major Indian tech firms like PayU and Meesho, further indicating growing investor confidence in the country’s innovation potential.

However, not all economic indicators are uniformly positive. The Reserve Bank of India reported that while manufacturing and services remained strong in May, there was a notable slowdown in urban consumption demand.

India’s aviation sector also made headlines. Air India, now owned by Tata Sons, received a capital injection of 9,588 crore rupees (around $1.1 million) from Tata and Singapore Airlines during the 2024-25 fiscal year. The airline is also grappling with the aftermath of a tragic air crash on June 12.

In the stock market, the Nifty 50 index climbed to a record high of 25,549 points as investor sentiment improved following the de-escalation of Middle East tensions. The index rose more than 2% over the past week and is up over 7% for the year. Meanwhile, the yield on India’s 10-year government bond declined by 3 basis points from the previous week, now trading at 6.27%.

As India weathers another round of global instability, its ability to adapt and seize opportunities—especially in the defense sector—signals a significant shift in economic and strategic thinking.

Elon Musk Sounds Alarm on Falling Birth Rates, Warns of Civilizational Collapse

June 28, 2025June 29, 2025 Staff ReporterGlobal, Opinion 0

Tech billionaire Elon Musk has once again voiced his growing concern over what he believes is humanity’s most significant existential threat: declining birth rates. Reacting to a recent social media post that cited a Fortune report on demographic trends, the Tesla and SpaceX founder stressed the alarming consequences of modern fertility patterns and emphasized the need for higher birth rates to avoid long-term societal collapse.

The discussion was triggered by a post shared on X (formerly Twitter) by user Mario Nawfal, who drew attention to findings suggesting that the often-cited replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman is no longer sufficient to maintain stable population levels. Nawfal wrote, “Scientists now say 2.1 kids per woman won’t cut it — 2.7 is the real number needed to avoid long-term extinction. Right now, the U.S. is at 1.66, and most rich countries are even lower, including Italy at 1.29 and Japan at 1.30.”

Nawfal explained that the revised figure of 2.7 children per woman takes into account various social and biological factors such as the growing number of people who remain childless and gender disparities at birth. In support of the post, Elon Musk reiterated the significance of addressing the trend by reposting Nawfal’s data and adding his own comment: “People who have kids do need to have 3 kids to make up for those who have 0 or 1 kid or population will collapse.”

Musk has long linked demographic decline to the downfall of great civilizations, most notably the Roman Empire. “Low birth rates were the primary factor in their downfall — shockingly overlooked by most historians,” Musk previously said, pointing out how historical societies failed to recognize the risks of unsustainable fertility levels. He considers the matter not just a demographic or statistical challenge, but a civilizational one, warning of long-term ramifications. As he put it, “If you don’t believe me now, just wait 20 years.”

His advocacy is not without personal commitment. Over the last 20 years, Musk has become a father to 14 children. His journey into parenthood began in 2002 with the birth of Nevada Alexander, his first child with then-wife Justine Wilson, a Canadian author. Tragically, Nevada died of sudden infant death syndrome at only ten weeks old. Musk and Wilson went on to have five more children: twins Vivian and Griffin, followed by triplets Kai, Saxon, and Damian. Since then, Musk has had additional children, making him one of the most high-profile figures to practice what he preaches in terms of contributing to population growth.

Concerns about declining fertility rates are not limited to Musk and independent commentators. International agencies are now addressing the issue with growing urgency. A new report from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), titled “The Real Fertility Crisis,” highlights the widespread nature of low fertility levels and the growing number of people unable to meet their desired family size.

“If you don’t believe me now, just wait 20 years,” Musk emphasized again in light of the UN’s findings.

The 2025 State of World Population (SOWP) Report by the UNFPA is particularly significant because it marks one of the agency’s most explicit acknowledgments to date of the challenges associated with global fertility decline. The report found that hundreds of millions of people globally are not having as many children as they would prefer. Two of the most commonly cited reasons are the escalating financial burden of childrearing and increasing difficulty in finding compatible partners.

India, the world’s most populous country, is also seeing fertility rates dip below the replacement threshold. According to the report, India’s total fertility rate has now decreased to 1.9 births per woman. This is a major shift from earlier decades when families in India were much larger. Andrea M Wojnar, UNFPA’s India Representative, credited the decline to improvements in education and better access to reproductive health services. “India has made significant progress in lowering fertility rates – from nearly five children per woman in 1970 to about two today, thanks to improved education and access to reproductive healthcare,” Wojnar said.

Musk’s alarmism may strike some as exaggerated, but his consistent messaging is gaining traction as more global data points to a steady decline in birth rates, particularly in developed and rapidly developing countries. He sees the risk as both mathematical and civilizational — a slow but potentially irreversible shift in the structure of human society. While some experts caution against overreaction, others acknowledge that fertility decline could lead to a host of economic and societal issues, such as aging populations, labor shortages, and reduced economic growth.

The UNFPA report seeks to clarify that the problem is not necessarily overpopulation, as previously believed, but rather the growing mismatch between fertility aspirations and reality. Economic pressures, career priorities, social isolation, and changing gender roles are all contributing to people choosing to have fewer or no children.

Elon Musk’s views place him among a small but vocal group of public figures calling for a reevaluation of societal attitudes toward parenthood and family size. His insistence that “people who have kids do need to have 3 kids” stems from the idea that demographic stability cannot be achieved if most people have only one or two children, especially when others have none. It’s a simple numbers game, he argues — one that humanity is currently losing.

By referencing ancient Rome and other past civilizations, Musk is also making a cultural and historical argument. He believes that like Rome, modern societies risk falling into decline if they fail to maintain robust population growth. His call to action isn’t just aimed at policymakers or economists but at everyday citizens who can help reverse the trend through family-building.

While some critics question whether increasing birth rates is the correct or most ethical solution — especially considering environmental concerns and resource distribution — the concern about aging populations and shrinking workforces is already playing out in countries like Japan, South Korea, and Italy. These nations are grappling with pension crises, labor gaps, and diminished innovation capacity due to shrinking youth populations.

Musk’s message, therefore, is as much a warning as it is a challenge. With his blend of data, historical context, and personal commitment, he continues to advocate for a fundamental rethink of modern reproductive priorities. As he warned once again, “If you don’t believe me now, just wait 20 years.”

AI Revolution Accelerates: Sam Altman Predicts a Future of Superintelligence, Robot Builders, and ‘Fake Jobs’

June 28, 2025June 29, 2025 Staff ReporterOpinion, Technology 0

As Americans prepare for the Fourth of July, marking it with growing cornfields and rising fireworks tents, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has ignited a different kind of spark—one grounded in technological transformation. In a thought-provoking essay published on June 10, Altman shared his latest projections for the near future of artificial intelligence, with a notable emphasis on humanoid robots and self-sustaining AI systems.

Altman asserts that humanity has reached a pivotal moment in its evolution with AI. “We are past the event horizon; the takeoff has started,” he wrote. “Humanity is close to building digital superintelligence, and at least so far it’s much less weird than it seems like it should be.” According to him, developments once considered improbable or distant are now unfolding rapidly. Much of the foundational work in developing intelligent agents and robots, he suggests, is already complete.

Highlighting AI’s exponential growth, Altman cited ChatGPT as an example. “ChatGPT is already more powerful than any human who has ever lived,” he remarked. “Hundreds of millions of people rely on it every day and for increasingly important tasks; a small new capability can create a hugely positive impact; a small misalignment multiplied by hundreds of millions of people can cause a great deal of negative impact.”

He points to a phenomenon he calls a “self-reinforcing loop,” describing how the success and capability of AI are propelling rapid infrastructure development. This momentum, he argues, is laying the groundwork for even more significant automation. “The economic value creation has started a flywheel of compounding infrastructure buildout to run these increasingly-powerful AI systems,” he explained. “And robots that can build other robots (and in some sense, datacenters that can build other datacenters) aren’t that far off.”

Altman’s essay touches not just on the technical possibilities, but on how humanity is psychologically adapting to this rapid progress. He paints a picture of society quickly becoming accustomed to AI’s growing powers. The process, he says, turns the extraordinary into the ordinary.

“Already we live with incredible digital intelligence, and after some initial shock, most of us are pretty used to it,” Altman wrote. “Very quickly we go from being amazed that AI can generate a beautifully-written paragraph to wondering when it can generate a beautifully-written novel; or from being amazed that it can make life-saving medical diagnoses to wondering when it can develop the cures; or from being amazed it can create a small computer program to wondering when it can create an entire new company. This is how the singularity goes: wonders become routine, and then table stakes.”

His reflections also take on a historical perspective, exploring how technological advances shift our sense of purpose and redefine work. In an earlier essay, Altman had referenced the now-obsolete job of the lamplighter, who once lit street lamps before the advent of electric lighting. “Many of the jobs we do today would have looked like trifling wastes of time to people a few hundred years ago, but nobody is looking back at the past, wishing they were a lamplighter,” he wrote back then. “If a lamplighter could see the world today, he would think the prosperity all around him was unimaginable. And if we could fast-forward a hundred years from today, the prosperity all around us would feel just as unimaginable.”

In this latest essay, he replaces the lamplighter with a different metaphor: a subsistence farmer from a thousand years ago. Altman envisions how such a person would perceive the modern workplace and its seemingly trivial roles. “A subsistence farmer from a thousand years ago would look at what many of us do and say we have fake jobs, and think that we are just playing games to entertain ourselves since we have plenty of food and unimaginable luxuries,” he wrote. “I hope we will look at the jobs a thousand years in the future and think they are very fake jobs, and I have no doubt they will feel incredibly important and satisfying to the people doing them.”

While Altman acknowledges that job displacement is inevitable, he also sees a path toward previously unimaginable prosperity. He argues that society will not only survive but thrive amid these shifts. “The rate of technological progress will keep accelerating, and it will continue to be the case that people are capable of adapting to almost anything,” he stated. “There will be very hard parts like whole classes of jobs going away, but on the other hand the world will be getting so much richer so quickly that we’ll be able to seriously entertain new policy ideas we never could before. We probably won’t adopt a new social contract all at once, but when we look back in a few decades, the gradual changes will have amounted to something big.”

However, Altman also points out two significant challenges to this vision. The first is the “alignment problem”—the difficulty in ensuring that AI systems behave in ways that align with human values and objectives. This issue underscores the broader concern that AI might take actions that are logically sound but socially or ethically harmful. The second challenge is democratization—ensuring that access to AI technology is widespread and not concentrated in the hands of a few tech billionaires or companies. Both problems, Altman warns, are human in nature rather than technical.

Outside observers have weighed in on Altman’s bold vision, with a mixture of skepticism and intrigue. On the podcast AI Daily Brief, host Nathaniel Whittemore referenced a sharp critique from Jeffrey Miller of Primer.ai, who questioned the democratic legitimacy of Altman’s ambitions. “Democracy means absolutely nothing, and people don’t get to vote on whether we want the singularity, which probably leads straight to human extinction,” Miller said. “Do you support running a global referendum on whether we allow you guys to persist in trying to summon the superintelligent demons in the hope that they’ll play nice with us and destroy our current civilization gently?”

Whittemore also cited Ethan Mollick, a respected academic associated with MIT, who praised the specificity of Altman’s predictions. “One thing you could definitely say about Sam and Dario is that they are making very bold, very testable predictions,” Mollick noted. “We will know whether they are right or wrong in a remarkably short time.”

Mollick’s reference to Dario Amodei points to the broader chorus of voices predicting the rapid emergence of AI-powered robotics. Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, is known for his similarly bullish outlook. Nvidia’s Jensen Huang is another prominent figure echoing the sentiment, making it clear that belief in the rise of intelligent machines extends well beyond a single visionary.

So what happens when humanoid robots begin sharing workspaces with people—or perhaps replace them altogether? That’s one of the critical questions hanging over the AI boom. Will people adapt, or will the change be too fast and too deep?

Whittemore closes with a metaphor that encapsulates the gravity of Altman’s message. “This is basically the first alarm, followed by a snooze button for some of the most important conversations we’ll ever have as a human species.”

If that metaphor proves accurate, then humanity is at the brink of a journey that promises both exhilaration and uncertainty in equal measure. The next few years could redefine not just work and technology, but what it means to be human in a world of artificial minds.

Supreme Court Backs Trump in Narrowing Blocks on Birthright Citizenship Ban

June 28, 2025June 29, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

In a significant ruling on Friday, June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with President Donald Trump by allowing the administration to limit nationwide judicial orders that had been preventing the enforcement of his controversial policy to end automatic citizenship for U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants and foreign visitors. This decision marks a crucial moment in Trump’s broader efforts to impose more restrictive immigration rules.

The 6-3 decision, with the court’s liberal justices in dissent, now returns the case to the lower courts. These courts are tasked with determining how this ruling should be applied in practice. While the Supreme Court did not directly address whether the birthright citizenship ban itself is constitutional, the judgment nonetheless clears a procedural hurdle for Trump’s policy to potentially advance further.

The Trump administration’s request to the high court did not focus on a definitive ruling about the legality of denying citizenship to children born in the U.S. under these circumstances. Instead, the administration argued that lower courts had overstepped their authority by issuing universal injunctions, which blocked the policy from taking effect across the entire country during ongoing litigation.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, challenged the legitimacy of these broad, nationwide court orders. She argued that such actions go beyond the judicial powers granted by Congress. “Some say that the universal injunction ‘give[s] the Judiciary a powerful tool to check the Executive Branch,’” she wrote. “But federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch; they resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given them. When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too.”

This reasoning reflects the court’s growing discomfort with the expansive power lower courts have used in recent years to block major federal policies nationwide. Justices and legal scholars have increasingly scrutinized the use of nationwide injunctions, particularly in cases involving contentious policies from both Democratic and Republican administrations.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, a liberal member of the court, issued a strongly worded dissent. Speaking directly from the bench, she expressed profound opposition to the ruling, describing it as a judicial failure with severe consequences. She stated that the decision was a “travesty” and warned that it would “cause chaos for the families of all affected children.”

The court’s ruling was among six released on the final day of its current term, highlighting the importance and urgency of the decisions being made. The ruling stops short of validating Trump’s executive order but does reduce the ability of lower courts to impose sweeping national blocks while the legality of such orders is being debated.

The use of nationwide injunctions has long sparked criticism from both Democratic and Republican leaders. These types of judicial orders, which halt the implementation of policies across the country, are intended to prevent potential harm while lawsuits proceed. However, critics argue they give disproportionate influence to individual judges and undermine the democratic process.

The broader issue underlying this legal battle is whether Trump has the authority to eliminate birthright citizenship for certain groups of U.S.-born children. The executive order signed by Trump on his return to office aims to deny citizenship to those born on American soil if neither parent is a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident.

Trump’s policy is part of a sweeping immigration agenda that seeks to reduce both legal and illegal immigration. His administration has previously moved to ban travelers from over a dozen nations, accelerate deportations—particularly of individuals suspected of gang affiliation from countries like Venezuela—limit refugee admissions, and strip legal protections from over half a million migrants residing in the U.S.

The order to end birthright citizenship sparked immediate legal backlash. Twenty-two states and numerous immigrant advocacy organizations filed lawsuits, arguing that the move conflicts with the U.S. Constitution and previous rulings from the courts.

Central to the argument is the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified after the Civil War. This amendment established citizenship rights for formerly enslaved individuals and stated that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are citizens. This clause was designed to overrule the Supreme Court’s infamous Dred Scott v. Sandford decision, which had denied Black Americans the right to citizenship.

Trump and his supporters contend that the children of undocumented immigrants and temporary visitors are not truly “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States because their parents lack legal status. Based on this interpretation, they believe these children do not qualify for automatic citizenship.

However, this view is strongly opposed by most constitutional experts, legal scholars, and immigration advocates. They argue that Trump’s interpretation would require a dramatic re-reading of the 14th Amendment and goes against long-standing legal precedent. In particular, they point to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which upheld that a child born in the United States to immigrant parents—who were not citizens—was nonetheless an American citizen. Wong Kim Ark was born in San Francisco to parents who were subjects of the Chinese Emperor, yet the court affirmed his citizenship under the 14th Amendment.

This precedent forms a central pillar in the opposition’s legal challenge. Critics argue that excluding certain children born in the U.S. from citizenship sets a dangerous precedent and opens the door to broader exclusions based on ancestry or parentage.

The high court’s latest decision does not determine whether Trump’s executive order will ultimately stand. Instead, it allows the policy to be more easily implemented by lifting the universal injunctions that had previously blocked it across the country. This procedural win makes it harder for opponents to prevent enforcement of the order while they continue their legal fight.

Moving forward, the legal battle over birthright citizenship is likely to return to the lower courts, where judges will weigh constitutional arguments in greater detail. Given the Supreme Court’s reluctance to address the constitutional question directly in this instance, it remains to be seen how and when the justices might eventually rule on the core issue of whether children born on U.S. soil to undocumented parents can be denied citizenship.

For now, Trump and his supporters have scored a procedural victory that may allow the policy to take effect in parts of the country—unless lower courts find other grounds to block it. However, the controversy is far from over, and with lawsuits continuing to unfold across multiple jurisdictions, the future of birthright citizenship in America remains uncertain.

The Giving Back Foundation Hosts Thousands Who Gathered in Central Park on Saturday for UPLIFTNY25: A Day of Spirituality & Wellness at Rumsey Playfield

June 27, 2025June 28, 2025 Staff ReporterCommunity 0

Ambassador Binaya S. Pradhan among the notable speakers at this Inaugural event celebrating International Yoga Day and Summer Solstice.

New York, NY – On Saturday, June 21, 2025, nearly 5,000 participants gathered in the heart of Central Park for UPLIFTNY25, a powerful and inspiring day filled with yoga, meditation, music, and holistic healing. Marking both International Yoga Day and Summer Solstice, the full-day event was presented by The Giving Back Foundation in collaboration with The Mayor’s Office of Sports, Wellness and Recreation and the Indian Consulate in New York.

Attendees of all ages participated in a diverse lineup of activities designed to promote mental well- being, spiritual growth, and community connection.

“UpliftNY25 was a powerful reminder that when we come together in the spirit of service and unity, we create real and lasting change ” noted Meera Gandhi, Founder of The Giving Back Foundation.

“I am deeply moved by the compassion and commitment shown by everyone involved. This is how we build a better world—one act of kindness, one heart at a time. The energy was radiant, and the impact will ripple far beyond this moment.”

“As we gather in the spirit of mindfulness and shared purpose, may this celebration encourage us all to embrace yoga’s values in our daily lives—for personal well-being and for a more sustainable and compassionate world,” said Ambassador Binaya S. Pradhan, Consul General for India in New York in his inaugural speech welcoming guests to the event. Throughout the day, attendees engaged in a wide range of wellness activities let by renowned practitioners and performers including:

Yoga and meditation sessions with Inga Benson, Madame Gandhi, and Tirlok Malik

Aura chakra healing led by Miriam Belov

Astrological predictions with celebrity astrologer Darryl Gaines

Spiritual guidance on managing anxiety and stress with by Bhushan Deodhar of Sri Sri Ravi Shankar’s, Art of Living

Live music and DJ sets by Madame Gandhi and DJ Rekha

A high-energy closing dance session led by Daybreaker

In a special moment, several audience members had the opportunity to ask questions of spiritual leader Bushan Deodhar, including a young girl from local organization Global Girls Glow, who asked about strategies for overcoming stress and anxiety.

Participants were also treated to morning tea sponsored by Organic India, a complimentary vegetarian lunch, and beverages from Smartwater and The Hemp Division of Harney & Sons, which offered samples of their Sparkling Elixirs.

About The Giving Back Foundation:

The Giving Back Foundation is a nonprofit organization committed to promoting mental wellness, community engagement, and holistic well-being. Through various programs and events, the foundation

fosters connection, healing, and personal growth, working to create lasting positive change in the lives of individuals and communities. Its aim is to act as a catalyst in creating a new generation of leaders and thinkers from communities around the world. The Foundation supports charities with strong women leadership programs and workshops – including the Cherie Blair Foundation for Women, and the Eleanor Roosevelt Leadership Center – and also acts as a platform for positive dialogue and debate among young people to help promote positive social change.

Learn more at thegivingbackfoundation.net .

About Meera Gandhi

Meera Teresa Gandhi is the daughter of an Indian admiral and an Irish mother, raised in India and later educated in the UK, Ireland, and Canada. Her lifelong commitment to service began at 16, when she volunteered at Ashadaan, a Missionaries of Charity shelter, where she met and worked with Mother Teresa for over two years — a transformative encounter that sparked her dedication to giving back.

She continued community service throughout her education and early career, and in 2009, co-founded The Giving Back Foundation®, which she leads as CEO. The foundation supports global initiatives focused on education, mental wellness, and social empowerment, with 100% of proceeds from its products funding charitable programs.

Now based between New York, London, Hong Kong, Mumbai, and Dubai, Meera Gandhi continues to champion compassion and service as essential forces for global change. Learn more at meeragandhi.com.

About Ambassador Binaya Srikanta Pradhan, Consul General of India, New York:

Amb. Binaya Srikanta Pradhan is a career diplomat of the 2002 batch of the Indian Foreign Service. He speaks English, Russian, Hindi, and Odiya languages. His diplomatic career includes senior roles in Indian Embassies in Moscow, Turkmenistan, and Pakistan from 2004 to 2012. During 2012-14, he managed India’s relations with Afghanistan and Iran at the Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi.

From 2014 to 2019, Amb. Pradhan served as the Chief of Staff to the Minister of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Government of India. His international engagements extended to being the Deputy Chief of Mission in the Embassy of India, Moscow, from June 2019 to July 2021.

Prior to his current role as Consul General of India, New York, he held the position of High Commissioner of India to Tanzania and Permanent Representative to the East African Community (EAC) from August 2021 to January 2024. During this period, the India-Tanzania relationship was elevated to a ‘Strategic Partnership,’ and the first overseas campus of the prestigious Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras in Zanzibar, Tanzania, was set up. Amb. Pradhan demonstrates a keen interest in economic and energy diplomacy.

ABOUT THE PERFORMERS:

Madame Gandhi

Kiran Gandhi, professionally known as Madame Gandhi, is an American electronic music producer, drummer, artist, and activist celebrated for her uplifting, percussive electronic music and advocacy for gender liberation and personal empowerment.

Gandhi’s musical journey includes touring as a drummer for renowned artists such as M.I.A., Thievery Corporation, and Kehlani. In 2015, she gained international recognition after running the London Marathon while free-bleeding to challenge menstrual stigma, sparking a global conversation about menstruation taboos.

Beyond her performances, Gandhi is a sought-after speaker, delivering talks at prestigious platforms like TED, where she was honored as a TED Fellow. Her accolades include being named in Forbes’ 30 Under 30 in Music and BBC’s 100 Women.

In 2022, while pursuing a Master’s at Stanford University, Gandhi traveled to Antarctica to record the sounds of melting glaciers, aiming to raise awareness about climate change. These recordings are featured in her song “In Purpose,” where, for the first time, nature is credited as an artist to receive a portion of streaming royalties, as part of Earth Percent’s Sounds Right initiative. In June 2023, she was awarded the Songwriters Hall of Fame Abe Olman Prize for excellence in songwriting and leadership. Her music video “Waiting For Me” won the Jury Award at SXSW.

Currently, Madame Gandhi is preparing for the release of her next album, “Let Me Be Water, ” in collaboration with the gender-positive music non-profit We Make Noise, scheduled for May 2025.

Madame Gandhi continues to travel globally, speaking, DJing, and performing. Her DJ sets incorporate diverse percussive influences, ranging from Bhangra and Afro house to Reggaeton, all while she MCs and plays live drums. Her mission remains to use her music and voice as mediums for messages about personal expression, sustainability, and thriving.

Bhushan Deodhar

Bhushan Deodhar is the Chief of Staff to Gurudev Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, leading global initiatives for The Art of Living Foundation. A meditation and leadership expert, he has trained executives at the World Bank, United Nations, and MIT Sloan. As a strategist, he facilitates high-level engagements with world leaders, promoting peace and well-being worldwide. He serves as CEO of Shankara Naturals and Director of Sri Sri Tattva, bridging mindfulness with entrepreneurship. With two decades of experience in diplomacy, business, and humanitarian efforts, he is a catalyst for transformational leadership. Bhushan is dedicated to Gurudev’s vision of a stress-free, violence-free world—one breath at a time.

Miriam Belov

Miriam is a best selling author, healing intuitive and a pioneering expert with 50 years of work in the field. As she guides you in this inner journey, you will explore your chakra system, how it relates to integral health and then allow it to empower you in your true being.

Clarifying your passion and purpose – with authenticity and gratitude – past life wisdoms help you to manifest your heart’s aspiration in this life/here and now. Collaborating with nature, stand in your sovereign power and serve.

Tirlok Milik

Tirlok Malik is an Emmy-nominated filmmaker, restaurateur, entrepreneur, and passionate advocate for Ayurveda and wellness. He is known for his significant contributions to cinema in Hollywood and Bollywood and has pioneered the immigrant experience in America through films like Lonely in America and Khushiyaan. His work has garnered numerous awards and accolades for showcasing cultural connections and human stories that resonate globally.

Malik is based in New York but works worldwide. Beyond filmmaking, Tirlok actively promotes Ayurveda as a philosophy of holistic living and balance through “Happy Life Yoga” (No mats needed, it’s the yoga of life), sharing its timeless wisdom with diverse audiences. As an entrepreneur, he has successfully merged his creative vision with business ventures, including managing acclaimed restaurants and spearheading community initiatives.

Inga Benson

Inga Benson has taught and practiced Yoga for over 25 years. She believes in the power of movement as a vehicle for learning how to live with oneself and others. Self awareness without judgement nurtures curiosity and compassion. She is a C-IAYT yoga therapist, a board certified dance/movement therapist and is licensed in New York as a Creative Arts Therapist.

Darryl Gaines

For over two decades, Darryl has been a trusted guide, offering profound astrological insights to help individuals understand the ever-evolving story of their lives. With a deep well of wisdom, he brings clarity to life’s complexities—whether in health, relationships, career, ancestral connections, or personal purpose.

His readings explore a person’s innate gifts, life path, and present moment, while offering grounded strategies to navigate the unknown. With this insight, clients often move forward with greater confidence, clarity, and a deeper sense of agency.

Darryl’s work has earned international recognition, with features in New York Magazine, Los Angeles Times, and Entertainment Weekly, and appearances on the BBC, MSNBC, The Sally Kirkland Show, ExtraTV, and Access Hollywood.

He is honored to support a diverse community of clients, including celebrated artists across film, television, music, and the arts—many of whom speak of his steady support and transformative guidance.

DJ Rekha

DJ Rekha (born Rekha Malhotra) is a producer, curator, educator, and founder of Basement Bhangra, one of NYC’s longest-running club nights. A SummerStage mainstay, DJ Rekha’s musical repertoire is rooted in South Asian music and includes all styles of international and contemporary dance music. They have performed for President Obama, Priyanka and Nick Jonas, have shared the stage with Madonna, Cher, Abida Parveen, M.I.A, John Legend and more in venues across the world. DJ Rekha has produced music for Broadway, films and television, including the opening theme (with Raj Makhija and David Sharma) on Padma Lakshmi’s Hulu show “Taste the Nation.

”An inducteé into the New York City People’s Hall of Fame and Grand Marshal for the New York City Dance Parade, DJ Rekha has curated concerts for diverse multi-generational audiences for Lincoln Center, Central Park Summerstage and more, and has provided their musical expertise to Spotify, DJ City and WNYC public radio.

Daybreaker

Daybreaker is the original early-morning dance and “coffee party” — a joyful rebellion against booze-filled

nightlife culture that sparked a global movement. Founded in 2013 in New York City by Radha Agrawal with partners Eli Clark-Davis and Timothy Patch, Daybreaker flips the script by trading late nights and substances for sunrise coffee socials, yoga and full send dance floors — all built around joy, mischief, and human connection.

Twelve years and 1,000 events later, Daybreaker spans 60+ cities across all seven continents, creating multigenerational, multi-ethnic communities rooted in wellness, belonging, and radical self-expression. The movement has danced everywhere from the White House to the Sydney Opera House — and now SummerStage at Central Park — and opened every stop of Oprah’s last sold out stadium tour, proving that dance is one of the most powerful tools for mental health and collective joy.

In 2022, Daybreaker launched its sister nonprofit, Belong Center, to end loneliness and build a culture of belonging for people and the planet — extending its mission into communities IRL coast to coast. Belong Center is now in 25 states across the US hosting Belong Circles in person every month, and just launched the nation’s first National Social Connection Corps to empower citizens to do RASCALS (Random Acts of Social Connection And Love) to make their communities more socially connected.

More than a party, Daybreaker is a lifestyle — a daily reminder that the most radical thing people can do is wake up, dance, and belong.

Learn more at www.daybreaker.com and www.belongcenter.org.

Media Contact: Karen Rosenberg

karen@empireeventsgroup.com

212-625-1025

President Murmu to Lead MSME Day 2025 Celebrations, Unveil Major Initiatives for Sector Growth

June 27, 2025June 28, 2025 Staff ReporterBusiness, India 0

President of India, Droupadi Murmu, is set to lead the upcoming ‘MSME Day 2025 – Udyami Bharat event’ on June 27, 2025, at Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi. The event, organized by the Ministry of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSME), will also see the participation of key government officials including Jitan Ram Manjhi, the Union Minister for MSMEs, Shobha Karandlaje, Minister of State in the same ministry, and Manoj Kumar, Chairman of the Khadi and Village Industries Commission. Senior ministry officials and representatives from associated organizations will also be in attendance.

The annual MSME Day serves as a platform to recognize the invaluable contribution made by the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises sector to India’s economic development. At the same time, it acts as a launchpad for multiple forward-looking initiatives aimed at creating a robust, competitive, and future-ready MSME ecosystem. This year’s event is poised to be particularly significant, with several major launches and acknowledgements planned in the presence of the Hon’ble President.

One of the key moments of the event will be the release of a commemorative postage stamp by President Murmu. This special stamp marks the 25th anniversary of the Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGTMSE), which has been a cornerstone of financial support for micro and small businesses across India. Over the last quarter-century, CGTMSE has played a pivotal role in providing credit support to Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs), with more than 1.18 crore credit guarantees approved. The cumulative value of these guarantees stands at a staggering Rs 9.80 lakh crore. Notably, in the just-concluded financial year 2024-25 alone, the CGTMSE extended a record Rs 3 lakh crore worth of credit guarantees.

The President will also inaugurate the newly developed Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Portal, a significant initiative aimed at enhancing the ease of doing business for MSEs. One of the recurring challenges faced by MSEs is the delay in receiving payments, which ties up significant capital and hampers business expansion and operational efficiency. The ODR portal has been developed to address this issue by offering a streamlined, digital method for resolving disputes. “To enhance ease of doing business, as also access to justice for MSEs, Ministry of MSME has developed an end-to-end ODR Portal, Parties to get the cases resolved from the convenience of their location, in a speedy and cost-effective manner,” the announcement highlighted. The portal aims to enable MSEs and their clients to settle payment disputes quickly and conveniently from anywhere, eliminating the need for lengthy legal processes and physical appearances.

In a move to promote innovation and cutting-edge technology in the sector, President Murmu will launch MSME Hackathon 5.0. This will be followed by the official announcement of the results of the previous edition, Hackathon 4.0. These hackathons fall under the Incubation component of the MSME Innovative segment, which is a part of the broader MSME Champions Scheme. This initiative is geared toward encouraging innovation, nurturing startups, and enabling MSMEs to adopt advanced and emerging technologies. Through this program, innovators across multiple sectors were invited to present their ideas via recognized Host Institutes. Selected ideas are eligible for financial support of up to Rs 15 lakh each. “Hackathon facilitates incubating novel ideas, support for mentorship and growth aligned with the Atma Nirbhar Bharat vision,” the statement said. These hackathons not only encourage creative solutions but also provide a nurturing ecosystem through mentorship and funding to bring these ideas to fruition.

Another important launch scheduled for MSME Day 2025 is the release of ‘MSME Patrika’, an in-house journal published by the Ministry of MSME. This publication is expected to serve as an informative resource containing valuable insights, updates, and articles on the sector. It aims to help business owners and stakeholders better understand the opportunities and challenges within the MSME landscape. The journal will also act as a platform for MSMEs to share experiences and best practices.

Alongside the Patrika, a booklet titled ‘Know Your Lender’ will be unveiled. This guide is designed to help MSMEs navigate the often-complex world of credit and financing. It will serve as a practical tool to help business owners understand their rights and responsibilities when seeking loans, and to identify the best sources of funding for their specific needs. “A booklet ‘Know Your Lender’ will be released which will provide guidance to MSMEs on credit and will enable MSMEs to better understand their rights for obtaining credit,” noted the ministry.

Overall, the MSME Day 2025 event promises to be a landmark occasion for India’s micro, small, and medium business community. With the active participation of the President and several top government officials, the event reflects the government’s sustained commitment to strengthening the MSME sector as a vital engine of economic growth, innovation, and job creation.

These initiatives, especially the ODR portal and the financial backing through CGTMSE and the Hackathon schemes, underscore the focus on making the MSME sector more self-reliant and digitally empowered. At a time when economic competitiveness and speed of execution are vital, providing MSMEs with effective tools to resolve disputes, access credit, and adopt innovation is expected to significantly enhance their contribution to India’s GDP and export potential.

As India continues on its journey towards becoming a global manufacturing and innovation hub, the emphasis on MSMEs through such targeted support mechanisms reinforces the vision of a more inclusive and dynamic economy. President Murmu’s role in presiding over these developments also highlights the central role of MSMEs in national policymaking and the broader economic narrative.

The celebration of MSME Day this year is not just about recognizing the past achievements of the sector, but also about laying down a comprehensive roadmap for the future. The collective aim is to make Indian MSMEs more resilient, technologically advanced, and capable of meeting both domestic and international market demands.

In conclusion, MSME Day 2025 will serve as a milestone in the government’s ongoing efforts to empower and uplift one of the most vital sectors of the Indian economy. With new platforms for innovation, justice, financial support, and knowledge-sharing being introduced, the event is poised to inspire a renewed wave of growth and opportunity across the country’s vast network of micro, small, and medium enterprises.

IIT Monk’s Remark to Google CEO Sparks Conversation on Stress and Spirituality

June 26, 2025June 28, 2025 Staff ReporterCulture 0

At a time when tech leaders are constantly seeking productivity tools and life hacks to remain youthful and stress-free, an Indian monk and IIT graduate believes he has already unlocked the secret—and it’s entirely non-digital. Speaking at the India Global Forum 2025 in London, ISKCON monk Gauranga Das shared a compelling personal anecdote involving Google CEO Sundar Pichai, triggering thoughtful discussions on spirituality, digital burnout, and the toll of modern life.

On the final day of the event, Gauranga Das, a graduate of IIT Bombay who once appeared set for a bright career in engineering before taking a spiritual path, captivated the audience with his story. During his address, he recalled meeting Sundar Pichai, who was part of the same graduating batch at IIT, though in a different department. Despite not interacting during their student days, the two eventually crossed paths years later under very different circumstances.

What stood out during their meeting was a light-hearted yet meaningful exchange about their appearance. Gauranga Das recounted that Pichai, now 53 and at the helm of one of the world’s most powerful tech giants, remarked on the monk’s notably youthful appearance. In response, the spiritual leader pointed to the divergent lifestyles they lead. He quoted the Google CEO as saying that he looked younger, to which Gauranga Das replied, “You deal with Google, which creates stress. I deal with God, who releases stress.”

The crowd responded warmly to the story, appreciating its humor and underlying wisdom. The remark provided a perfect segue into the monk’s deeper message about the modern mental health crisis, especially one driven by digital overuse. Gauranga Das used the platform to issue a stark warning about the consequences of excessive screen time and growing social media dependence.

He backed up his concerns with data that emphasized the alarming spread of digital addiction. According to him, a staggering 230 million people across the globe are currently addicted to social media. Narrowing it down to India, he claimed that 70 percent of the country’s teenagers are spending an average of seven hours each day online. Additionally, he pointed out that one in every seven individuals worldwide is suffering from mental health disorders.

Gauranga Das used this backdrop to urge a return to more mindful living, emphasizing that a connection with the divine or spiritual discipline could act as a much-needed antidote to the overwhelming pressures of modern digital life.

So who is Gauranga Das? He is not just any monk; his multifaceted profile reveals a deep engagement with both the spiritual and the environmental realms. A product of IIT Bombay, he chose to renounce material pursuits early in life and is now a spiritual teacher, environmental advocate, and education reformer. Presently, he serves as a member of ISKCON’s Governing Body Commission and is the director of the Govardhan Ecovillage (GEV), an innovative project envisioned by Radhanath Swami that serves as a model for sustainable living.

Under Gauranga Das’s stewardship, Govardhan Ecovillage has gained international recognition. It was honored with the United Nations World Tourism Organization Award in 2017 and has earned accreditations from multiple key UN institutions, including the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).

In addition to his environmental work, Das plays a pivotal role in education and leadership training. He serves on the board of the Govardhan School of Public Leadership, which helps prepare candidates for India’s civil services. He also heads the Bhaktivedanta Research Centre, an institution that works to preserve ancient Vedic manuscripts and provides postgraduate education in philosophy. His literary contributions include the books Art of Resilience and Art of Focus, both of which explore timeless wisdom through a modern lens.

While Gauranga Das has carved his niche in spiritual and ecological circles, Sundar Pichai’s journey has unfolded in the high-stakes world of global technology. Born on June 10, 1972, in Madurai, Tamil Nadu, Pichai grew up in Chennai and later enrolled in IIT Kharagpur, where he pursued metallurgical engineering. His academic brilliance was evident early on—he received a silver medal for his performance at IIT.

Pichai’s pursuit of knowledge took him abroad, where he earned a master’s degree from Stanford University and an MBA from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Before joining Google in 2004, he worked with Applied Materials and the consulting firm McKinsey & Company.

At Google, Pichai was instrumental in shaping several flagship products that have become staples of the digital era. He played key roles in the creation and growth of Google Chrome, ChromeOS, Gmail, Google Drive, and Android. His influence at the company continued to grow, and in 2015, he was appointed CEO of Google. In 2019, he assumed leadership of Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company, succeeding co-founder Larry Page.

As CEO, Pichai has overseen Google’s strategic push into artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital infrastructure. His leadership and impact have earned him global recognition. He was named among Time magazine’s 100 most influential people in both 2016 and 2020. In 2022, he received the Padma Bhushan, India’s third-highest civilian award, for his distinguished contributions to trade and industry.

Despite their vastly different paths—one driven by Silicon Valley innovation, the other by ancient Vedic wisdom—both men have emerged as iconic representatives of modern India on the world stage. Their chance meeting and Gauranga Das’s humorous yet thought-provoking remark have opened up a broader conversation about stress, life choices, and the need to re-evaluate what success truly means in an increasingly digital world.

By placing spirituality in the spotlight amid a tech-dominated narrative, Gauranga Das left his audience with a resonant message: real rejuvenation may not lie in productivity apps or CEO routines but in meaningful connection—to others, to nature, and perhaps, to a higher power.

UK Launches Groundbreaking Project to Synthetically Create Human DNA Amid Ethical Debate

June 26, 2025June 28, 2025 Staff ReporterScience 0

A pioneering scientific effort has commenced in the United Kingdom with researchers aiming to synthetically construct the fundamental components of human life, marking what is believed to be the world’s first such attempt. This new initiative, called the Synthetic Human Genome Project, breaks a long-standing taboo in genetic research due to fears surrounding the creation of “designer babies” and unpredictable consequences for future generations.

The effort is being led with backing from the Wellcome Trust, the world’s largest medical charity, which has initially contributed £10 million to the project. According to the organization, despite ethical concerns, the benefits could outweigh the risks by significantly advancing treatments for diseases that currently have no cure.

Dr Julian Sale, a scientist from the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge and a participant in the project, described the venture as an enormous milestone in the biological sciences. “The sky is the limit. We are looking at therapies that will improve people’s lives as they age, that will lead to healthier aging with less disease as they get older,” he told BBC News. He further explained, “We are looking to use this approach to generate disease-resistant cells we can use to repopulate damaged organs, for example in the liver and the heart, even the immune system.”

However, not everyone shares the optimism. Critics warn that such technologies might be misused to create genetically modified or enhanced humans, potentially leading to serious ethical and security issues. Dr Pat Thomas, director of the advocacy group Beyond GM, voiced concern, stating, “We like to think that all scientists are there to do good, but the science can be repurposed to do harm and for warfare.”

The project was formally revealed to BBC News on the 25th anniversary of the Human Genome Project’s completion. That landmark achievement had mapped out all the molecules in human DNA and was also predominantly funded by Wellcome. DNA, the essential molecule found in every human cell, contains the complete genetic code needed for life. It consists of four repeating units, known as A, G, C, and T, which combine in different sequences to produce the blueprint of a human being.

While the Human Genome Project allowed scientists to read and understand this genetic code, the Synthetic Human Genome Project aims to take that knowledge further by enabling scientists to construct parts of DNA—and potentially entire chromosomes—from scratch. This would be achieved molecule by molecule, allowing researchers to go from reading genetic information to actually building it.

Initially, the team aims to develop techniques for assembling progressively larger segments of human DNA. The goal is to ultimately synthesize a complete human chromosome. These chromosomes contain the genes that regulate everything from development and growth to bodily repair and maintenance. Scientists plan to use these artificial chromosomes to conduct controlled experiments that may provide deeper insights into how our genes function.

According to Professor Matthew Hurles, director of the Wellcome Sanger Institute, which played a central role in sequencing the original Human Genome, “Building DNA from scratch allows us to test out how DNA really works and test out new theories, because currently we can only really do that by tweaking DNA in DNA that already exists in living systems.”

Although the research is strictly confined to laboratory settings using test tubes and petri dishes, it will provide scientists with an unprecedented degree of control over living human systems. Nevertheless, the same technology that could revolutionize medicine could also be used for more dangerous or unethical purposes.

Professor Bill Earnshaw, a renowned geneticist from Edinburgh University who previously devised a method for crafting artificial human chromosomes, issued a stark warning. “The genie is out of the bottle,” he told BBC News. “We could have a set of restrictions now, but if an organisation who has access to appropriate machinery decided to start synthesising anything, I don’t think we could stop them.”

Concerns also extend to the potential commercialization of the technology. Pat Thomas cautioned against the implications of commodifying synthetic biological creations. “If we manage to create synthetic body parts or even synthetic people, then who owns them? And who owns the data from these creations?”

Despite these ethical red flags, the Wellcome Trust stands by its decision to fund the research. Dr Tom Collins, who approved the funding, explained that the organization undertook careful consideration before moving forward. “We asked ourselves what was the cost of inaction,” he told BBC News. “This technology is going to be developed one day, so by doing it now we are at least trying to do it in as responsible a way as possible and to confront the ethical and moral questions in as upfront way as possible.”

In a bid to ensure ethical oversight, a parallel social science programme will accompany the scientific work. This initiative will be spearheaded by Professor Joy Zhang, a sociologist at the University of Kent. She emphasized the importance of engaging diverse voices throughout the process. “We want to get the views of experts, social scientists and especially the public about how they relate to the technology and how it can be beneficial to them and importantly what questions and concerns they have,” she said.

The project’s implications are vast, from revolutionizing how we understand disease to raising urgent questions about the future of humanity. As science pushes forward into the territory of creating human DNA from scratch, the world watches closely, torn between hopes of medical breakthroughs and fears of unintended consequences. The outcome of this landmark effort may ultimately shape not only the future of genetic research but also the broader moral and social fabric of our time.

China Edges Closer to B-2 Rival as U.S. Deploys Stealth Bomber Against Iran

June 26, 2025June 28, 2025 Staff ReporterGlobal, USA 0

In a stunning demonstration of military capability, the United States recently used its stealth B-2 Spirit bomber to target Iran’s most fortified nuclear facility—marking an unprecedented application of air power. While this headline-grabbing move captured global attention, another significant development has been unfolding quietly in the shadows: China appears to be progressing with its own stealth bomber program. Satellite images dated May 14, 2025, obtained by The War Zone, captured a strikingly large, stealthy aircraft with a flying wing design at a covert test site near Malan in China’s Xinjiang region.

The mysterious aircraft, which resembles a drone, is believed to be a high-altitude, long-endurance (HALE) platform. Analysts say its appearance outside newly constructed hangars suggests it could be part of a broader technological ecosystem involving China’s next-generation stealth projects such as the H-20 bomber and the J-36 fighter jet. Experts have estimated the aircraft’s wingspan to be roughly 52 meters—or about 170 feet—placing it in the same size category as the U.S. B-2 Spirit.

Though the sighting points to an impressive feat in aviation, questions persist about whether China’s technological leap was entirely indigenous. A shadow from the past resurfaces in this context, involving a man who was once an integral part of America’s stealth program. In 2005, former Northrop engineer Noshir Gowadia was arrested for leaking top-secret U.S. defense information to China and other foreign nations. His betrayal may have sown the seeds for the capabilities now visible in China’s burgeoning stealth aircraft arsenal.

Gowadia, born in Bombay (now Mumbai), joined Northrop in the 1960s. During his time with the company, he played a critical role in the development of the B-2’s revolutionary low-observable propulsion and stealth technology. After leaving Northrop in 1986, Gowadia went on to launch his own consulting firm. However, by 2004, federal investigators were scrutinizing his activities after classified infrared suppression documents were discovered in a furniture shipment addressed to him. The FBI’s findings indicated something far more alarming than a paperwork mishap.

According to Popular Mechanics, Gowadia had made several trips to China between 2003 and 2004, during which he allegedly handed over sensitive details about stealth technology. In return, he received approximately $110,000 over a span of three years. The FBI acted decisively in October 2005, raiding his home in Maui, Hawaii, and seizing 500 pounds of material that included paper documents and electronic storage devices.

“Gowadia had spent two decades at the aerospace and defense contractor Northrop (now Northrop Grumman) where he was instrumental in designing the stealth propulsion system for the B-2 Spirit bomber, one of the most revolutionary military technologies in generations,” the report stated. “He once had top security clearance and taught university classes in advanced aeronautical principles.”

Initially, Gowadia denied any wrongdoing, but eventually he submitted a written confession. “On reflection, what I did was wrong to help the PRC make a cruise missile. What I did was espionage and treason,” he admitted. His acknowledgment of guilt left little ambiguity about the gravity of his actions. In 2010, he was convicted on 14 counts under both the Arms Export Control Act and the Espionage Act. The following year, he was sentenced to 32 years in prison. Today, he remains incarcerated at the supermax federal penitentiary in Florence, Colorado.

Despite the conviction, the case continues to generate controversy. Gowadia’s son, Ashton Gowadia, has steadfastly maintained his father’s innocence. He alleges that vital pieces of evidence were withheld during the trial and that the FBI shaped the entire narrative to ensure a conviction. While these claims persist, the consensus among security experts is that the damage was already irreversible.

The intelligence compromised by Gowadia seems to have accelerated China’s access to advanced stealth capabilities. Observers now see a direct link between his betrayal and the technological maturity reflected in China’s recent aviation developments. The newly spotted aircraft near Malan bears key design similarities to the B-2 Spirit, particularly in its flying wing structure and its apparent ability to reduce radar cross-section, both hallmarks of American stealth design.

Though full operational details about the Chinese craft remain classified or speculative, its dimensions and structure hint at more than just a surveillance role. The aircraft could potentially be a manned bomber, a large autonomous drone, or a flexible platform capable of carrying advanced payloads for both reconnaissance and strike missions. With projects like the H-20 long-range stealth bomber reportedly in development for over a decade, the emergence of this HALE-like aircraft reinforces speculation that China is close to unveiling its own version of the B-2.

The geopolitical implications of this development are profound. As the U.S. continues to maintain a technological edge with proven platforms like the B-2, the emergence of a near-peer Chinese equivalent represents a shift in the balance of strategic air power. The B-2 remains the only operational stealth bomber in the world with long-range strike capabilities and the ability to penetrate the most heavily defended airspaces. However, if China succeeds in fielding a similar craft, it could significantly alter the equation of deterrence and response in any future conflict scenario.

China has remained tight-lipped about the aircraft spotted near Malan. No official statements have been released, nor have any details been published in state-controlled media. Nonetheless, defense analysts agree that this sighting adds weight to growing concerns about China’s rapid advancements in military aerospace technology. These developments are especially notable given the country’s past reliance on reverse-engineering foreign systems. With help from figures like Gowadia, China’s journey to achieving true stealth capabilities may have gained crucial momentum.

In retrospect, the full scope of Gowadia’s betrayal goes beyond the man himself. It exposed vulnerabilities in America’s defense industrial security and provided adversarial powers with a shortcut to catching up. The fallout from his actions is now playing out in satellite images, in foreign hangars, and perhaps soon in global airspace.

As China edges closer to deploying a stealth bomber that could stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the B-2, the world is witnessing a new era of aerial warfare defined not just by innovation, but also by the lingering consequences of espionage.

US Tightens Social Media Rules for Indian Students and Exchange Visa Applicants

June 25, 2025June 28, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, Social Media 0

In a significant shift in visa application requirements, the United States embassy in India has announced a new directive for individuals applying for student and exchange visitor visas. Effective immediately, all applicants for F, M, and J category non-immigrant visas must set their social media accounts to public. This measure is intended to assist U.S. officials in verifying the identities and eligibility of applicants during the standard security screening procedures.

The embassy announced the update on X (formerly Twitter), highlighting the need for enhanced transparency in the digital activities of visa aspirants. The embassy’s message stated, “Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J nonimmigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media accounts to public to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States under U.S. law.”

The latest policy applies to three major categories of U.S. non-immigrant visas. The F visa is designated for academic students who intend to pursue full-time education in the United States, typically at colleges, universities, or other academic institutions. The M visa is tailored for vocational or non-academic students, such as those enrolling in technical or trade programs. The J visa, meanwhile, is used by exchange visitors who may include researchers, scholars, professors, interns, and participants in cultural or educational exchange initiatives.

This new rule means that Indian students and others aspiring to study or participate in exchange programs in the United States must now ensure that their social media profiles are publicly viewable. The requirement comes on top of the existing policy in which applicants are required to disclose their social media handles when submitting their visa forms. While listing social media accounts was already part of the vetting process, the recent change intensifies this measure by demanding complete visibility of the content shared on these platforms.

This adjustment is framed as a security step rather than a bureaucratic hurdle. According to the embassy, the goal is to “facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility.” This suggests that social media activity is being used as an additional layer to verify personal claims made by visa applicants, detect inconsistencies, or identify any red flags that could potentially affect U.S. national security or public safety.

However, while this change has been clearly communicated, U.S. authorities have not elaborated on how long applicants must keep their social media accounts public. The duration for which the visibility must be maintained remains unspecified. This lack of clarity may leave applicants uncertain about when it would be safe to revert their accounts back to private settings after completing their visa applications.

Although officials have not disclosed the criteria they will use while evaluating the applicants’ social media profiles, this move reflects a broader global trend in which governments are increasingly scrutinizing individuals’ digital footprints as part of security and immigration procedures. It also signifies the growing importance of online behavior in decisions related to international mobility.

The requirement could prompt a variety of responses among applicants. Some might express concerns about the potential invasion of privacy, especially since personal profiles often contain information not directly relevant to the purpose of a visa. Others may worry that their posts, even if innocuous, might be misinterpreted or taken out of context, thereby impacting their chances of obtaining a visa. These concerns underscore the rising tension between security protocols and individual privacy rights in the digital age.

This policy change might also influence the way prospective students and exchange visitors manage their online presence. Applicants may now feel compelled to cleanse their profiles of any content that could be viewed unfavorably, even if it is harmless or unrelated to their intentions in the United States. This could result in a broader culture of self-censorship among international students and travelers who are eager to meet the new standards and avoid jeopardizing their visa eligibility.

The new guideline places greater emphasis on digital transparency. Given the high volume of Indian students applying for U.S. visas each year, the impact of this policy is likely to be widely felt. In recent years, the United States has remained a top destination for Indian students pursuing higher education, with tens of thousands of students traveling annually to American institutions for undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees. The same applies to researchers and other exchange participants who contribute to academic and cultural exchange between the two nations.

While the embassy has not introduced any penalties for non-compliance, it is implied that failing to adjust one’s privacy settings may delay or jeopardize the visa process. By aligning social media visibility with admissibility criteria, the U.S. visa vetting process now places a new spotlight on applicants’ digital lives, making it increasingly important for prospective students and visitors to ensure their online behavior reflects their intentions accurately and responsibly.

This development represents the latest in a series of policy measures aimed at tightening the vetting process for U.S. visa applicants. While the primary goal remains national security, the method used—requiring open social media access—marks a shift in how identities and risks are assessed in the modern digital context.

As global connectivity and digital footprints become more integral to individual identities, embassies and immigration offices are adapting their procedures accordingly. The U.S. embassy’s new rule underscores how personal online activities are now viewed as extensions of an applicant’s real-world conduct, especially when national security considerations are involved.

Although this step may add a layer of concern for many Indian applicants, especially regarding privacy and judgment criteria, it is clear that the embassy views this move as a necessary evolution in safeguarding U.S. interests. The measure may also reflect the broader geopolitical atmosphere, in which digital transparency is gaining precedence over traditional forms of documentation and interviews.

In summary, the United States has introduced a new and stricter guideline for Indian applicants of F, M, and J visas, requiring them to make their social media profiles publicly accessible. The intent is to help officials confirm the identity and suitability of applicants under U.S. law. The U.S. embassy noted in its post, “Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J nonimmigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media accounts to public.” This reflects a growing emphasis on digital scrutiny in visa processing, signaling an era where online behavior becomes as vital as formal documentation in determining international mobility.

US Strikes on Iran’s Nuclear Sites Caused Limited Damage, Say Intelligence Assessments

June 25, 2025June 27, 2025 Staff ReporterGlobal, USA 0

Recent United States military strikes on three of Iran’s nuclear facilities did not achieve their goal of fully dismantling the country’s nuclear program, according to a preliminary intelligence evaluation. The report, described by seven individuals familiar with its findings, indicates that while damage was done, the effect of the strikes is estimated to have delayed Iran’s progress by only a few months.

The evaluation was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), which serves as the Pentagon’s intelligence branch. It relied on battle damage assessments carried out by US Central Command following the strikes. According to one source, the analysis remains ongoing and may evolve as more intelligence is gathered. However, the early conclusions contradict assertions made by President Donald Trump and his administration regarding the effectiveness of the attacks.

President Trump has claimed that the strikes “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s nuclear enrichment infrastructure. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth echoed this sentiment, saying, “Iran’s nuclear ambitions have been obliterated.” Yet, two individuals briefed on the assessment stated that Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed. One of them added that the centrifuges “are largely intact.” Another source mentioned that the enriched uranium may have been removed from the targeted sites before the strikes occurred.

“So the (DIA) assessment is that the US set them back maybe a few months, tops,” said one of the sources.

Despite acknowledging the existence of the assessment, the White House firmly disagreed with its conclusions. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to CNN, “This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as ‘top secret’ but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community. The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran’s nuclear program. Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.”

While attending the NATO summit in the Netherlands, Trump dismissed CNN’s report in a Truth Social post, calling the operation “one of the most successful military strikes in history,” and claiming, “The nuclear sites in Iran are completely destroyed!”

Hegseth, also at the summit, clarified on Wednesday that the assessment was “a top secret report; it was preliminary; it was low confidence.” He suggested that the leak was politically motivated and said the FBI was investigating to identify the source of the leak.

The Pentagon continues to describe the strikes as an “overwhelming success.” Nonetheless, sources familiar with the matter emphasized that it is still early for a definitive analysis of the strikes’ effects. Intelligence gathering is ongoing, including within Iran itself.

Leading up to the US action, Israel had already been targeting Iranian nuclear sites. However, Israeli officials indicated they required US-deployed bunker buster bombs to complete the mission. American B-2 bombers dropped over a dozen such bombs on the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant and the Natanz Enrichment Complex. Yet, the bombs did not entirely destroy the centrifuges or the enriched uranium, according to the sources. The DIA concluded that damage was largely limited to aboveground facilities, including power infrastructure and buildings used in uranium metal conversion for potential weapons.

The Israeli evaluation also indicated that Fordow suffered less damage than initially anticipated. However, Israeli officials believe the combined strikes from both nations delayed Iran’s nuclear program by two years. They note that this delay assumes Iran can rebuild without interference—something Israel vows to prevent. It’s important to note that Israeli officials had already estimated a two-year delay before the US operation took place.

Hegseth reaffirmed the administration’s stance in a statement to CNN, saying, “Based on everything we have seen — and I’ve seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran’s ability to create nuclear weapons. Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran; so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the President and the successful mission.”

On Tuesday, Trump reiterated his confidence in the strikes, stating, “I think it’s been completely demolished,” and “Those pilots hit their targets. Those targets were obliterated, and the pilots should be given credit.”

When asked about the potential for Iran to rebuild, Trump responded, “That place is under rock. That place is demolished.”

Despite these confident assertions, Trump acknowledged that current intelligence is “inconclusive” and said more information is expected from Israel. Speaking from the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, he admitted, “The intelligence was very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don’t know. It could have been very severe.”

While the administration projects confidence, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine adopted a more cautious tone. He stated on Sunday that, given the ongoing nature of the damage assessment, it was “way too early” to determine whether Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been fully neutralized.

Republican Representative Michael McCaul, former chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, also struck a measured note. When asked by CNN, he declined to support Trump’s statement that Iran’s nuclear program had been “obliterated.” He explained, “I’ve been briefed on this plan in the past, and it was never meant to completely destroy the nuclear facilities, but rather cause significant damage. But it was always known to be a temporary setback.”

Weapons expert Jeffrey Lewis, a professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, reviewed commercial satellite images of the strike zones. He concurred that Iran’s nuclear program had not been eradicated. “The ceasefire came without either Israel or the United States being able to destroy several key underground nuclear facilities, including near Natanz, Isfahan and Parchin,” Lewis said. He noted that Parchin, a nuclear complex near Tehran, remains capable of helping Iran quickly reestablish its program. “These facilities could serve as the basis for the rapid reconstitution of Iran’s nuclear program.”

Classified briefings scheduled for both the Senate and the House were postponed on Tuesday. Sources said the all-Senate briefing was rescheduled for Thursday, while the House briefing also faced delays, with no immediate explanation or revised date provided.

Representative Pat Ryan, a Democrat from New York, commented on X that “Trump just cancelled a classified House briefing on the Iran strikes with zero explanation. The real reason? He claims he destroyed ‘all nuclear facilities and capability;’ his team knows they can’t back up his bluster and BS.”

The capability of the US’ Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs to effectively destroy Iran’s deeply buried nuclear sites has long been in question, particularly concerning the Fordow and Isfahan facilities. In fact, the US used Tomahawk missiles from a submarine against Isfahan, rather than deploying bunker buster bombs. One source explained this choice by noting that Isfahan’s lower levels are even deeper underground than Fordow’s and likely beyond the bomb’s reach.

Further complicating the picture, US officials believe Iran may possess undisclosed nuclear facilities that were not targeted and remain fully operational, according to two sources familiar with the intelligence.

Zohran Mamdani Secures Democratic Mayoral Nod, Defeats Cuomo in Stunning Primary Upset

June 25, 2025June 27, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani is poised to clinch the Democratic nomination for mayor after former Governor Andrew Cuomo conceded late Tuesday night following the initial round of ranked-choice voting. The early results sent shockwaves through the city’s political landscape as Mamdani, a 33-year-old Democratic socialist, pulled off an unexpected lead against the much older and more established Cuomo.

Mamdani’s campaign successfully energized younger voters and newcomers to the political process, establishing a robust ground operation that surpassed all competitors. Despite Cuomo’s significant name recognition and his campaign spending more than three times as much as Mamdani’s, the assemblyman surged ahead. With 95% of precincts reporting two hours after polls closed at 9 p.m., Mamdani was the first-choice candidate for 44% of voters, while Cuomo garnered 36%. City Comptroller Brad Lander followed with 11%.

Just after midnight, Mamdani took the stage at his election night celebration on a Long Island City rooftop brewery, where he received a hero’s welcome. “Today, eight months after launching this campaign with the vision of a city that every New Yorker could afford, we have won,” Mamdani declared. “I will be the mayor for every New Yorker, whether you voted for me, for Gov. Cuomo or felt too disillusioned by a long, broken political system to vote at all. I will fight for a city that works for you, that is affordable for you, that is safe for you.”

The ranked-choice system played in Mamdani’s favor, especially due to Lander’s public endorsement of him as a second-choice pick. This alignment meant Lander’s supporters were likely to boost Mamdani in subsequent tabulation rounds. “Together, we are sending Andrew Cuomo back to the suburbs,” Lander said at his own campaign event.

Although Cuomo conceded the primary, he and incumbent Mayor Eric Adams have already petitioned to appear on the general election ballot in November as independent candidates.

According to preliminary data, Mamdani led citywide with 43.5% of more than 990,800 votes cast across the five boroughs. Cuomo’s campaign headquarters at the Carpenters Union building on Manhattan’s west side saw a surprise appearance from the former governor. “I want to applaud the Assemblyman for a really smart and good and impactful campaign. Tonight was his night. He deserved it. He won,” Cuomo stated, accompanied by his daughters and son-in-law. He also shared that he had personally called Mamdani to congratulate him.

Mamdani began primary day with a 5:40 a.m. press conference in Astoria Park before heading to Jackson Heights to meet voters. “We are approaching the dawn of a new era in New York City,” he said that morning. “We are turning the page on the corrupt politics of the past that made this the most expensive city in the United States of America.”

As vote counts trickled in during the evening, Mamdani’s supporters gathered at the brewery to watch the results, while most of his volunteers were at various watch parties organized by allied groups. The mood was jubilant. “I am in a little bit of a state of disbelief,” said Gabbi Zutrau, a social media strategist for the campaign.

“It is such a historic moment for us as Muslims, as South Asians, as immigrants, as New Yorkers,” said Saman Waquad, president of the Muslim Democratic Club of New York. “The way Zohran has brought people together in this campaign has been so incredibly beautiful.”

Janos Marton, a former candidate for Manhattan district attorney who helped canvass for Mamdani, noted the campaign’s ability to energize diverse voter bases. “It was clear that he was bringing new people in — South Asians, Muslims, young people — and that was true on Staten Island, where I live, and I guess it was across the city too,” Marton remarked.

Other candidates trailed significantly behind. Former Comptroller Scott Stringer conceded shortly after polls closed, and City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams received just 4% of the vote. Several others — including Zellnor Myrie, Michael Blake, Whitney Tilson, Jessica Ramos, Paperboy Prince, and Selma Bartholomew — secured less than 1% each.

In other races, incumbent Public Advocate Jumaane Williams defended his seat against Assemblymember Jenifer Rajkumar. Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine held a substantial lead in the comptroller race over Brooklyn Councilmember Justin Brannan, who conceded later that evening.

The results released Tuesday night reflect only ballots cast in person or those received and scanned by June 20. The Board of Elections will not release the full ranked-choice tabulation until at least July 1. Affidavit ballots and corrected absentee ballots returned by July 14 will also be included in the final tally, with certified results expected thereafter.

Mamdani’s upset victory over Cuomo marked a powerful rebuke of the political establishment. Cuomo had initially entered the race as a frontrunner, capitalizing on his extensive political résumé and asserting his experience as a counter to both the Trump administration and what he portrayed as city mismanagement. Despite not residing in New York City for decades, Cuomo adopted a “Rose Garden” strategy, keeping a low profile while letting his well-funded campaign and outside groups, including the $25 million-backed Fix the City PAC, dominate the media space with anti-Mamdani messaging.

Nevertheless, Mamdani prevailed. Currently serving his third term in the New York State Assembly, he drew support through viral social media content and a ground game driven by 50,000 volunteers who knocked on over a million doors across the five boroughs. His campaign promises included fare-free buses, rent freezes on stabilized units, and municipal grocery stores in underserved neighborhoods.

Mamdani and Lander co-endorsed one another to maximize the ranked-choice system’s potential, even appearing together on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert on the eve of the primary. Lander’s visibility grew after he was arrested by ICE officers while escorting immigrants from a routine court hearing.

The Working Families Party had backed a progressive slate topped by Mamdani and Lander. Adrienne Adams, their third endorsed candidate, addressed her supporters in Southeast Queens, saying: “We made people stand up and take note who this campaign was and why we were here and made people realize there really is somebody in this race that really does care about me.”

Elsewhere in the city, several borough-level contests saw decisive outcomes. In The Bronx, incumbent Borough President Vanessa Gibson fended off City Councilmember Rafael Salamanca. In Brooklyn, Borough President Antonio Reynoso retained his seat, defeating cannabis executive Khari Edwards. Manhattan’s borough presidency went to State Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal, who beat Councilmember Keith Powers.

Manhattan and Brooklyn also held district attorney races. Incumbents Alvin Bragg and Eric Gonzalez won re-election easily. These contests, tied to the state judicial system, were not subject to ranked-choice voting.

All 51 City Council seats were up for election, many facing heated primary contests. In Brooklyn, Councilmember Shahana Hanif beat challenger Maya Kornberg, while Alexa Aviles triumphed over Ling Ye. In Manhattan, Chris Marte maintained a lead over Elizabeth Lewinsohn and Jess Coleman. In The Bronx, Councilmember Pierina Sanchez dominated former Councilman Fernando Cabrera.

Although the full results and ranked-choice redistribution won’t be finalized until July, the early data suggests that Zohran Mamdani has not only won the Democratic nomination but has also reshaped New York City’s political conversation heading into November’s general election.

Canada Opens New Doors for Skilled Workers Without Job Offers Starting July 2025

June 25, 2025June 26, 2025 Staff ReporterCommunity, Immigration 0

Canada continues to reinforce its position as one of the world’s most open and welcoming destinations for international workers. Beginning in July 2025, the process for skilled individuals to work in the country becomes even more streamlined—with new avenues available that do not require a job offer. For those aspiring to start a new chapter in Canada but haven’t yet landed a position, these revised pathways may present the ideal opportunity to make that goal a reality.

This article explores the various work permit options and immigration programs now accessible in Canada, which allow foreign nationals to live and work in the country without first securing employment.

One of the most accommodating options available is the Open Work Permit, a permit that allows foreign nationals to work for nearly any employer in Canada. Unlike many traditional work permits, this version doesn’t demand a pre-arranged job, offering flexibility that appeals to many newcomers trying to establish themselves.

The Open Work Permit is commonly granted to specific categories of applicants, including spouses or common-law partners of skilled workers, spouses of international students, and international students who qualify for a Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP). Refugees and certain individuals holding temporary resident permits may also be eligible. However, there are restrictions—holders of this permit cannot work for employers found guilty of violating labour standards or those listed as ineligible by the Canadian government.

Another accessible route for working in Canada without a job offer is through the PGWP. This is designed for international students who graduate from designated learning institutions in Canada. If eligible, students can receive a work permit that allows them to remain in the country and gain employment for up to three years, depending on the duration of their study program.

This post-graduation permit offers several major benefits. First, it requires no job offer for application, providing graduates the freedom to seek work across various sectors and employers. Secondly, the PGWP gives students the opportunity to accumulate valuable Canadian work experience, which plays a crucial role in strengthening permanent residency applications.You don’t need a job offer to apply. You can work for any employer, in any field. It helps build Canadian work experience, which is useful for permanent residency applications.

The International Mobility Program (IMP) is another avenue that permits individuals to work in Canada without undergoing the Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) process or securing a job offer, in certain circumstances. The IMP supports individuals who meet specific criteria, such as those covered under international trade agreements like the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), formerly known as NAFTA, or those participating in reciprocal employment arrangements.

Additionally, individuals entering Canada for reasons deemed to provide significant social, cultural, or economic benefit may qualify under this program. The nature of IMP work permits varies, but many of them are open permits or exempt from LMIA requirements, which significantly broadens access for those lacking a concrete job offer.Unlike employer-specific work permits, many IMP work permits are either open or exempt from LMIA requirements, making them more accessible for people who don’t have a job secured.

A further route involves applying for a Spousal Open Work Permit. This is available to individuals whose spouses or common-law partners are already residing in Canada under a valid work or study permit. It allows the partner to work for any Canadian employer without needing prior employment confirmation. A crucial advantage of this permit is that its validity is directly linked to the status of the principal applicant—the spouse or partner. As long as the primary permit holder remains in good standing, the accompanying spouse’s permit remains active as well.

“The key benefit here is that the validity of your permit is usually tied to your spouse’s status. So as long as they remain in good standing, your work permit remains valid too,” the article explains, highlighting the mutual stability such an arrangement offers to couples looking to build a life in Canada together.

Entrepreneurs also have an exciting avenue to consider in the form of Canada’s Start-up Visa Program. This option provides both a pathway to permanent residency and the chance to build a business in Canada, all without requiring a traditional job offer. Instead of seeking employment from an existing company, applicants must pitch their business idea to a designated Canadian organization—such as a business incubator, angel investor group, or venture capital fund.

To qualify, entrepreneurs must secure a letter of support from the designated organization, and they also need to meet minimum financial and language proficiency benchmarks. Once these conditions are fulfilled, they can proceed to apply for permanent residency and obtain a work permit to begin building their business in Canada.

This approach is particularly attractive for innovators and self-starters who may not fit into standard employment channels but have the skills and vision to contribute to the Canadian economy through new enterprises. Instead of traditional employment, you’ll need to pitch your business idea to a designated organization. Once accepted, you can apply for permanent residency and receive a work permit to start developing your business in Canada.

The latest updates to Canadian work and immigration policies reflect a significant shift towards inclusivity and accessibility. By offering multiple paths for skilled individuals to contribute to the country without needing pre-existing employment, Canada is strengthening its appeal as a destination for talent worldwide.

Summary Table

Pathway	Requires Job Offer?	Type of Work Permit	Notable Features
Open Work Permit	No	Open	Flexible, work for almost any employer
Post-Graduation Work Permit	No	Open	For graduates of Canadian institutions
International Mobility Program	Sometimes No	Varies (often open)	Includes agreements and exemptions
Spousal Work Permit	No	Open	Tied to partner’s status in Canada
Start-up Visa Program	No	Employer not required	Requires business support, PR pathway

MIT Study Warns ChatGPT Use May Be Quietly Dulling Human Brainpower

June 24, 2025June 26, 2025 Staff ReporterScience, Technology 0

ChatGPT is widely admired for its speed, intelligence, and ability to answer almost any question, making it a trusted companion for millions across the globe. However, a new and eye-opening study from MIT’s Media Lab suggests that this digital assistant might be doing more harm than good—particularly when it comes to our brain function. The research indicates that overreliance on AI tools like ChatGPT could be quietly impairing memory, critical thinking, and even fundamental brain activity.

The study, titled “The Cognitive Cost of Using LLMs,” was recently published on arXiv and delves deep into how large language models (LLMs), especially ChatGPT, impact our capacity to think, learn, and remember. The researchers sought to uncover whether depending on such tools might be coming at the price of our mental sharpness.

To examine the idea of a “cognitive cost,” the MIT scientists monitored 54 students over a four-month period. They used electroencephalography (EEG) headsets to measure their brain activity and divided them into three groups. One group regularly used ChatGPT to complete their assignments. Another group relied on Google for help. The third group was dubbed the “Brain-only” group and received no external assistance, using only their own reasoning and knowledge to complete tasks.

At first, the ChatGPT group seemed to have the advantage. Their results came in faster and with less effort, giving the impression that AI had improved their productivity. But over time, the findings revealed a concerning downside. Students who used ChatGPT for writing essays demonstrated worse memory retention, less brain engagement, and lower test scores when compared to those who didn’t use AI at all. The research team summed up their findings by stating, “The LLM group’s participants performed worse than their counterparts in the Brain-only group at all levels: neural, linguistic, and scoring.”

Interestingly, even the group that used Google outperformed the ChatGPT group. Although they did not show the same high levels of brain activity as the Brain-only group, the Google users still demonstrated moderate engagement and came up with more thoughtful responses than their ChatGPT-using peers. On the other hand, those relying solely on their brains produced original content and more insightful analysis.

The negative effects of ChatGPT extended beyond the initial use. Even when participants from the ChatGPT group were later asked to complete tasks without any help, their brain activity remained lower than the other groups. In contrast, participants from the Google and Brain-only groups showed increased brain activity as they adjusted to new methods. This led researchers to believe that regular use of ChatGPT may alter not just how we think, but whether we actively think at all.

One of the most sobering insights from the study is how AI usage fosters mental passivity. ChatGPT users reported that the tool made it easier to get information and complete assignments, but that same ease appeared to reduce their motivation to question or critically analyze what the AI produced. As the researchers explained, “This convenience came at a cognitive cost, diminishing users’ inclination to critically evaluate the LLM’s output or ‘opinions’.”

Another troubling point raised in the study concerns algorithmic bias. When ChatGPT provides information, it does so based on patterns in the data it was trained on—not necessarily what is factual or intellectually valuable. These patterns are often influenced by the goals of the companies behind the AI models, including profit motives and stakeholder priorities. The researchers suggest this creates a more advanced form of the echo chamber effect, where AI doesn’t just repeat what it’s learned—it shapes user thinking by presenting its output as truth. Rather than developing independent thought, users risk falling into a pattern of accepting AI-generated answers without scrutiny.

As AI tools continue to become a part of daily life—from drafting emails to writing essays and doing research—this study serves as a wakeup call for everyone, especially students, educators, and working professionals. While it’s tempting to see ChatGPT as a powerful partner in productivity, the research emphasizes that it shouldn’t become a substitute for genuine mental effort.

The researchers emphasized that caution is necessary as these tools become even more advanced. Users need to stay aware of the possible negative effects on mental processes. They warned, “In a world where convenience is king, critical thinking might just be the first casualty.”

The broader message of the study is clear: while AI is an extraordinary technological advancement, it’s not without consequences. Using tools like ChatGPT without awareness or limits may diminish key cognitive skills over time. Instead of empowering users, it can encourage mental shortcuts and dependency, weakening the brain’s natural ability to process, question, and remember.

Students who may turn to ChatGPT to complete an essay more quickly should be mindful of what they might be giving up in return. It’s not just about the quality of the content or getting a better grade—it’s about how their brain functions are being shaped by the tools they rely on. As the study shows, those who chose not to rely on AI ultimately emerged with stronger cognitive engagement and better overall performance.

In light of these findings, educators may need to rethink how AI tools are introduced in classrooms. While banning them outright may not be realistic, guiding students on how to use AI mindfully and in moderation could help preserve critical thinking. Professionals in creative or analytical fields should also reflect on their own usage. If convenience leads to complacency, the long-term cost could outweigh the short-term benefits.

In the end, the message from MIT’s study is not to avoid AI altogether, but to recognize its potential impact on how we think and learn. As AI continues to evolve, our understanding of its effects on human cognition must keep pace. Otherwise, we may find that in solving our problems more quickly, we’ve inadvertently slowed down our minds.

As the researchers put it, “This convenience came at a cognitive cost.” And as AI becomes more deeply woven into the fabric of daily life, that cost may become one we can no longer afford to ignore.

Iran Strikes U.S. Base in Qatar in Retaliation for U.S. Attack on Nuclear Infrastructure

June 24, 2025June 25, 2025 Staff ReporterDiplomacy, Global 0

Iran launched a barrage of ballistic missiles at a major U.S. military base in Qatar on Monday, marking its initial retaliation for the recent American airstrike that targeted crucial parts of Iran’s underground nuclear program. This marked a sharp escalation in tensions following a surprise U.S. operation over the weekend.

According to early reports, Iran fired a minimum of six missiles at targets in Qatar. Eyewitnesses on the ground in Doha, the nation’s capital, reported hearing explosions, while video footage circulated online appeared to show air defense systems being activated to intercept the incoming projectiles. The assault occurred shortly after Qatari authorities closed the country’s airspace. This preemptive move came in the wake of warnings from both the U.S. and U.K. embassies in Doha advising their citizens to remain indoors and seek immediate shelter.

In addition to the attack on the U.S. base in Qatar, Iranian state-controlled media claimed that Iran was also targeting American military installations in Iraq. However, a U.S. defense official speaking to Reuters clarified that, despite Iran’s claims, only the base in Qatar had come under direct attack.

Officials in Washington, including President Donald Trump’s team, were closely observing Iran’s reaction from the Situation Room in the White House, a senior official confirmed.

The Qatari government responded quickly and firmly to the missile strike. A spokesperson from the Qatari Foreign Ministry said that the country’s air defense systems had successfully intercepted all of the missiles launched by Iran and that there were no reported injuries or deaths. “We consider this a flagrant violation of the sovereignty of the State of Qatar, its airspace, international law, and the United Nations Charter,” said Majed al-Ansari, the ministry’s spokesperson, in a statement posted on X. He added, “We affirm that Qatar reserves the right to respond directly in a manner equivalent with the nature and scale of this brazen aggression, in line with international law.”

Given the weekend’s attacks, the targeting of Qatar—particularly the al-Udeid air base—had been anticipated. Al-Udeid, which was constructed in the mid-1990s, has long served as a strategic hub for U.S. military operations in the region. It acts as the forward headquarters for the U.S. Central Command and has played a pivotal role in numerous American military campaigns in the Middle East over the past two decades.

Approximately 10,000 American personnel are stationed at al-Udeid. The base also supports operations for the Royal Air Force and the Qatari military. Notably, in preparation for the recent escalation, U.S. aircraft had been relocated from the base in the days leading up to America’s joint offensive with Israel targeting Iranian nuclear sites.

In a potentially significant revelation, The New York Times reported that Iran may have coordinated the retaliatory strikes with Qatar in advance to reduce the likelihood of casualties. This strategy, if confirmed, echoes Tehran’s approach five years ago following the American assassination of one of its top military leaders, General Qassem Soleimani. At that time, Iran also launched a limited missile response that caused damage but was carefully calibrated to avoid provoking a full-scale conflict.

Such a symbolic form of retaliation may serve multiple purposes for Iran. Domestically, it can help appease public pressure for a strong response against perceived American aggression. Internationally, it keeps the door open for a diplomatic resolution to the ongoing nuclear standoff. By choosing a path of controlled escalation, Iran appears to be balancing its need to project strength with the strategic imperative to avoid a broader war.

Market reactions suggest that investors and analysts alike do not view Iran’s latest actions as a step toward wider regional conflict. Prices for benchmark crude oil in both London and New York markets dropped significantly following news of the missile attacks. This suggests that traders interpreted the situation as a measured response rather than the beginning of a major military escalation in the Persian Gulf, which is a key global energy hub.

While no American or Qatari personnel were injured and the damage to infrastructure appears to be minimal, the political implications of the strike are considerable. Iran’s decision to strike a base that hosts not just U.S. forces but also serves as a vital operational center for allied militaries in the region sends a clear signal of its readiness to retaliate—even if in a symbolic manner.

For its part, the U.S. administration has yet to release an official statement detailing its intended course of action following Iran’s missile launch. However, given the calculated nature of the Iranian strike and the apparent lack of casualties, some analysts believe that Washington may choose to de-escalate rather than respond with further military force.

This recent exchange highlights the fragile balance that characterizes U.S.-Iran relations, particularly when it comes to issues surrounding Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Over the past several years, tensions have repeatedly flared following incidents that range from the dismantling of the Iran nuclear deal to direct attacks on military personnel and infrastructure. Monday’s events are just the latest chapter in this volatile narrative.

As the situation develops, regional players and global powers alike will be watching closely for signs of either further confrontation or the possibility of a return to the negotiating table. Iran’s calculated missile launch, devoid of fatalities and seemingly coordinated to limit escalation, may be designed to offer exactly that choice.

AAPI’s 43rd Convention Offers An Enriching Experience Of Networking, Learning, And Celebration

June 24, 2025June 25, 2025 Staff ReporterCommunity 0

“It is my great pleasure to personally invite you all to the 43^rd Annual Convention and Scientific Assembly of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI), being held in vibrant Cincinnati, Ohio, from July 24th to 27^th, 2025,” said Dr. Satheesh Kathula, President of AAPI, while inviting AAPI members to the prestigious event that will bring together nearly 1,000 delegates including Physicians, Academicians, Researchers and Medical students, along with guests to the Convention in Cincinnati from across the country for an enriching experience of networking, learning, and celebration.

Elaborating on the highlights of the convention, Dr. Kathgula said, the Convention will offer 10–12 hours of Continuing Medical Education (CME) sessions delivered by world-renowned speakers, a dynamic CEO Forum, Women’s Forum, and specialized tracks on Medical Education and Medical Licensing.

This conference will host acclaimed Physicians, Healthcare professionals and leaders from across the world for a dynamic exchange of ideas, serving as a collaborative effort to shape the future of healthcare on a global scale. In addition to the academic and professional offerings, attendees will enjoy three nights of world-class entertainment, making this a well-rounded and memorable gathering.

“Whether you are a physician, a healthcare professional, or an industry partner, this convention presents a valuable opportunity to showcase your business and connect with influential leaders in the medical field, said Dr. Sunil Kaza, Chair of AAPI BOT. “We look forward to welcoming you all to Cincinnati for this exceptional event.”

Dr. Mario Capecchi, a Nobel laureate, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine/Physiology in 2007 for his contributions to the development of “Mouse knockout technology” will deliver the keynote address during the 43^rd annual AAPI Convention.

Other confirmed Speakers at the Convention include: Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, president-elect of the American Medical Association; Dr. Lyuba Konopasek, MD, Senior Vice President, Intealth/ECFMG, Executive Director, FAIMER; Michael Suk, MD, BOT Chair, AMA; George Abraham, MD, Chair, Federation of State Medical Boards; and Dr. D Nageshwar Reddy, a Padma Vibhushan awardee.

“We have convened a dedicated group of people to meet the needs of the 2025 convention and are very excited about this year,” Dr. Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, President-Elect of AAPI said. “We invite you to the AAPI 43^rd Annual Convention and take advantage of the Early Bird Special that is going on at the moment. Please reach out to any one of the Convention Team with questions or comments.”

Dr. Meher Medavaram, Vice President of AAPI, while describing how AAPI’s mission has evolved in the past 43 years, said, “Today, AAPI is strong representing over 120,000 Indian American physicians, 130 local Chapters, who make up of 10% of total physicians in the US and nearly 50% of International Medical Graduates, rooted in every corner of the nation, who serve every 7th patient in the US. We are proud of our achievements and our contributions to the healthcare industry and the millions of people we serve.”

Physicians and healthcare professionals from across the country will convene and participate in the scholarly exchange of medical advances, to develop health policy agendas, and to encourage legislative priorities in the coming year.

The annual convention offers extensive academic presentations, recognition of achievements and achievers, and professional networking at the alumni and evening social events, in addition to offering an exciting venue to interact with leading physicians, healthcare industry leaders, academicians, and scientists of Indian origin. Physicians and healthcare professionals from across the country will participate in the scholarly exchange of medical advances, to develop health policy agendas, and to encourage legislative priorities in the coming year.

“The annual convention offers extensive academic presentations, recognition of achievements and achievers, and professional networking at the alumni and evening social events. We invite you to be an active participant in this transformative journey and be part of the Convention,” said Dr. Kathula. For more details on AAPI and the convention, please visit: www.aapiconvention.org and www.aapiusa.org

US Issues Terror Alert Amid Rising Tensions Over Israel-Iran Conflict

June 23, 2025June 25, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA, Security 0

Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem has released a National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) Bulletin warning of an elevated threat environment throughout the United States due to the nation’s direct involvement in the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. While there are currently no verified, specific, or credible threats aimed at the US homeland, officials are urging vigilance as tensions continue to rise in the Middle East.

Secretary Noem emphasized the government’s responsibility to ensure public safety during these volatile times. “It is our duty to keep the nation safe and informed, especially during times of conflict,” she stated. Highlighting the dangers associated with the unfolding Israel-Iran confrontation, she added, “The ongoing Israel-Iran conflict brings the possibility of increased threat to the homeland in the form of possible cyberattacks, acts of violence, and antisemitic hate crimes.”

The advisory went into effect on June 22, 2025, and is set to expire on September 22, 2025, at 11:59 PM ET. Authorities are encouraging citizens to promptly report any suspicious activities or potential threats to local police, FBI Field Offices, or the nearest Fusion Center. In emergencies, individuals should contact 911.

The Department of Homeland Security’s bulletin highlights several key concerns contributing to the elevated risk. One of the primary dangers involves the likelihood of cyber intrusions targeting American infrastructure. These attacks may come from pro-Iranian hacktivists or individuals and groups with direct affiliations to the Iranian government. Their typical targets are unsecured American networks and internet-connected devices.

The Department also raised concerns about Iran’s historical commitment to retaliate against American officials deemed responsible for the death of Qassem Soleimani, the high-ranking Iranian military commander killed in a US airstrike in January 2020. This long-standing objective has remained an active element of Iranian foreign policy and intelligence operations, suggesting potential threats to US leadership or government infrastructure.

In addition to cyber threats, there is a growing fear of physical acts of violence within the United States. The bulletin mentions that if Iran’s leaders issue a religious decree urging retaliation against US targets, it could significantly increase the probability that individuals loyal to the Iranian regime might resort to violence on American soil. Such a ruling might inspire lone actors to conduct attacks, even without direct orders or links to foreign terrorist organizations.

Past incidents also play a role in shaping this alert. The bulletin recalls that since 2020, US law enforcement has managed to prevent several potentially deadly plots backed by Iran. Additionally, attempts by the Iranian regime to eliminate critics of the government residing within the United States have been thwarted. These failed operations underscore the ongoing intent and capability of Iran to pursue its enemies, even within foreign borders.

Another concerning element cited in the bulletin is the pattern of anti-Semitic and anti-Israel sentiment motivating previous terrorist attacks within the United States. The ongoing strife between Israel and Iran could further inflame such hostility, potentially triggering more attacks carried out by individuals influenced by extremist ideologies. The Department warns that the current environment could serve as a catalyst for those looking to act on their hatred against the Jewish community, pro-Israel supporters, or American governmental and military symbols.

Foreign terrorist organizations have also responded vocally to the Israel-Iran conflict. Groups such as HAMAS, Lebanese Hizballah, the Houthis, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine have issued media statements since the beginning of the confrontation. Some of these statements have explicitly called for violence against US personnel and facilities located in the Middle East, presenting yet another layer of threat to American interests abroad.

Domestically, there is concern that such international calls for action could inspire violent extremists and hate crime offenders to target Jewish institutions, synagogues, community centers, pro-Israel events, or even federal buildings and personnel. The Department emphasized that any individual or group associated, or even perceived to be associated, with these entities might be at risk of becoming a target.

In addition to issuing warnings, the Department of Homeland Security has provided resources and guidance to help the public stay safe. Authorities encourage the public to remain attentive to instructions and updates from local officials and emergency personnel.

On the cybersecurity front, the Department’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) continues to offer guidance and tools for bolstering the defenses of US digital infrastructure. This includes practical steps for securing networks, identifying vulnerabilities, and preparing organizations for possible cyberattacks.

For those who witness any suspicious behavior or encounter potential threats—whether physical or digital—the DHS encourages reporting through the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) Initiative. This collaboration between DHS, the FBI, and local law enforcement aims to detect and prevent terrorism and other criminal activity before it escalates. The campaign reiterates its familiar slogan: “If You See Something, Say Something®.” Authorities urge the public to promptly report suspicious activity or threats of violence—including those made online—directly to local law enforcement, the FBI, or a Fusion Center.

As tensions in the Middle East continue to escalate, US officials remain alert to the possibility that these international hostilities could spill over into the homeland in the form of cyber disruptions, ideological violence, or targeted hate crimes. Although there are no immediate threats at this time, the government stresses the importance of public awareness and cooperation.

The current NTAS Bulletin is part of the Department’s broader efforts to prepare Americans for emerging threats while reassuring them that law enforcement and national security agencies are actively monitoring the situation. By staying informed and vigilant, officials hope to reduce the chances of any planned attacks succeeding.

The alert concludes by reminding citizens that while the threat level has risen due to international conflict, prompt action, public cooperation, and intelligence sharing can help prevent incidents and maintain safety across the country. The government is urging all individuals and communities to take part in safeguarding the homeland by remaining observant, proactive, and informed.

The NTAS Bulletin will remain in effect until September 22, 2025. Until then, local, state, and federal agencies will continue to evaluate and respond to developments both at home and abroad to ensure the continued safety of the American people.

Three H-1B Indian Workers Denied US Entry for Overstaying in India

June 23, 2025June 25, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

Three Indian professionals holding H-1B visas have been denied entry into the United States and had their visas revoked by US authorities after staying in India longer than permitted. All three were found to have exceeded the allowed duration of stay outside the US, with one individual away for nearly three months and the others for even longer. Despite presenting documentation that justified their prolonged absence and letters of support from their employers, they were still denied entry and asked to return to India.

One of the individuals involved shared details of the incident in a message that has since gained traction on social media.

The message, circulating widely with the title “H-1B visas cancelled in Abu Dhabi,” opens with a revealing account of the ordeal: “We had a particularly tough situation in US immigration in Abu Dhabi.” The sender explained that “authorities revoked H-1B visa and denied port entry for three candidates, including me, for staying in India for more than two months.”

This situation unfolded at the Abu Dhabi International Airport, which hosts a US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Preclearance facility. This preclearance service allows travelers to complete US immigration and customs inspections before even boarding their flight to the United States. It is one of the few locations outside of North America that provides this service, effectively turning it into a US border checkpoint.

Even though the affected individuals had documentation in hand to explain their stay in India, including proof of emergencies and employer-approved leave, their explanations were not enough to sway immigration officers. The worker stated, “Even after showing all the proof of emergency and approval emails from the company, the CBP still revoked their visas.”

He went on to explain that the visa was canceled under a specific provision: “Attorney denied entry and put a cancelled seal on visa with reason pursuant to 41.122(h)(3) seal and sent us back to India.” The message also provided an important caution for others on H-1B visas, emphasizing the importance of not staying out of the US for too long. “The maximum permissible stay outside the US is 60 days for H-1B holders with what he called a valid reason,” the message noted, adding that it’s much safer to limit foreign travel to between 30 and 40 days to avoid unnecessary complications with reentry.

To better understand the implications of such an action, it is helpful to look at the function and rules surrounding the H-1B visa. The H-1B is a non-immigrant visa issued by the United States to allow employers to bring in skilled foreign workers temporarily. These workers are generally employed in specialized fields such as information technology, engineering, medicine, and business. For a foreign worker to obtain this visa, their employer must sponsor them by filing a Labor Condition Application (LCA) with the US Department of Labor and then petitioning the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for approval.

The H-1B visa typically permits the worker to reside in the US for up to six years. However, employers can request extensions by filing Form I-129, a petition requesting the US government to continue the worker’s stay. Despite these options, being away from the US for extended periods without a proper reason or without continuous employment can be viewed by immigration authorities as a violation of visa terms.

Reactions to this incident were swift and emotional on social media, especially on the platform Threads, where a page named “nris_adda” highlighted the story with the caption, “Very sorry to hear this.” The post drew a range of responses from users, revealing divided opinions about who was at fault and what lessons others should draw from the incident.

One user expressed both sympathy and a practical takeaway: “Sadly, the worst experiences you will have are at the Canadian borders and the pre-Clearance facilities (Shannon, Abu Dhabi). Best to avoid those ports. Of course, the officers acted lawfully but failed to see the extenuating circumstances. Very sad.”

However, not all comments were empathetic. Another user took a more critical stance: “There is no need to be in India for 3 months if you are working in the USA.” This comment underlined the notion that extended stays outside the US might naturally raise red flags with immigration officers, regardless of personal circumstances.

A more judgmental comment pointed to a broader cultural observation: “Indians have a tendency to break rules and cry when there are repercussions. Visa is a privilege, not a right. If it clearly states you cannot stay for over 60 days, why do it and then fuss when denied entry?”

Another user echoed this sentiment, laying blame squarely on the visa holders themselves: “Ignorance is not an excuse. They have to blame only their carelessness.”

This case underscores a critical lesson for H-1B visa holders: awareness of and strict adherence to immigration guidelines is crucial. Even with the right paperwork and employer support, decisions at ports of entry rest with US immigration officers, who have broad discretion to revoke visas if they believe terms have been violated.

While the CBP acted within its legal boundaries, the lack of flexibility shown in a case involving emergency leave has sparked debate about the balance between enforcement and empathy. Still, as the experience of these three Indian workers demonstrates, the burden of proof lies heavily with the traveler, and even that may not always suffice.

The incident serves as a stark reminder of how vulnerable non-immigrant visa holders can be to sudden changes in their immigration status due to procedural misunderstandings or misinterpretations. For those relying on H-1B status to live and work in the US, maintaining continuous compliance with visa rules—even during trips abroad—is essential.

In conclusion, the revocation of H-1B visas for these three individuals reveals the strict scrutiny applied at US preclearance locations, especially when travelers are returning from extended stays outside the country. Their case highlights the need for both caution and awareness when navigating the complex landscape of US immigration, particularly under a non-immigrant visa.

Air India Passengers Face Mid-Air Door Scare on Delhi-Hong Kong Flight, Airline Stresses Safety

June 23, 2025June 24, 2025 Staff ReporterNation, Travel 0

Passengers aboard an Air India flight from Delhi to Hong Kong were left rattled on June 1 when they encountered a mid-air scare involving a malfunctioning door. About an hour after the Boeing 787 had taken off from Indira Gandhi International Airport, a door on the aircraft reportedly began to shake and emit alarming noises, including hissing and growling sounds. The incident was unsettling for many on board, though it ultimately posed no threat to flight safety. The crew took quick action by stuffing paper napkins into a narrow gap at the top of the door and pushing on it in an effort to reduce the noise and movement. The flight, despite the disturbance, continued without any formal interruption and landed safely in Hong Kong, according to a report from the Times of India.

This is not the first time that Boeing’s Dreamliner series has faced similar issues. There have been at least three earlier instances of doors making unusual noises mid-air. The first was reported in 2019 on a Japan Airlines flight. Later, two more cases emerged in 2022, one involving German airline TUI and the other American Airlines. In contrast to the Air India flight, all three of those earlier flights were diverted back to their origin airports due to safety concerns.

The current spotlight on Boeing 787 aircraft has intensified following a major crash that occurred on June 12 in Ahmedabad. That tragic accident claimed the lives of 275 individuals. It’s important to note, however, that the door-related issue on the Delhi-Hong Kong flight happened prior to that fatal crash.

Although events like these can be deeply unsettling for passengers, aviation experts and pilots have assured the public that such issues are not indicative of catastrophic danger. They have emphasized that doors on commercial aircraft are designed to stay sealed and cannot be opened mid-flight due to differences in cabin and external air pressure. According to several pilots, a hissing noise or minor shaking does not equate to a structural failure or compromise in overall safety.

The specific flight in question was Air India’s AI-314, which departed from Delhi at 11:45 pm—over an hour later than its scheduled departure time. One passenger recounted the unsettling moment in a social media post, saying, “About an hour after take-off, the door started shaking and making noises. It seemed the door seal came off due to air pressure.”

In the wake of the June 12 crash, scrutiny has intensified around Air India’s maintenance practices for its fleet of Boeing aircraft. Speaking publicly on the matter, Air India CEO and Managing Director Campbell Wilson emphasized the airline’s commitment to stringent maintenance and safety protocols. Referring to the aircraft that crashed in Ahmedabad, Wilson said the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner involved in that accident was “well-maintained” and had undergone its last significant inspection in June 2023, with the next scheduled check set for December 2025.

Offering further details on the aircraft’s technical condition, Wilson stated, “The plane was well-maintained, with its last major check in June 2023 and the next scheduled for December 2025. Its right engine was overhauled in March 2025, and the left engine was inspected in April 2025. Both the aircraft and engines were regularly monitored, showing no issues before the flight.”

To address public concerns, Wilson also clarified recent decisions made by the airline regarding its widebody operations. A 15 per cent reduction in widebody fleet activity has been implemented, but Wilson assured that this is a short-term step and not indicative of long-term issues.

Following the Ahmedabad tragedy and in line with directives from the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), Air India has launched comprehensive safety reviews of its Boeing 787 fleet. Out of the airline’s total of 33 Boeing 787 aircraft, thorough inspections have already been completed on 26 planes. Wilson noted that these aircraft have all been cleared for continued operation. The remaining seven planes are currently undergoing routine maintenance and will be subjected to the same detailed safety assessments before being allowed back into service.

“Following the review, the DGCA has confirmed that Air India Boeing 787 fleet and maintenance processes fully meet safety standards,” Wilson said.

While the DGCA has acknowledged certain maintenance-related concerns in its surveillance of Air India operations, it found no major safety issues specifically linked to the airline’s 787 fleet. The agency did, however, call on the airline to improve inter-departmental coordination and internal procedures to ensure that operational safety remains uncompromised.

On June 13, just one day after the Ahmedabad crash, the DGCA issued an order mandating heightened monitoring of Air India’s Boeing 787 aircraft. The fleet in question includes 26 Boeing 787-8 models and seven Boeing 787-9 aircraft. This decision reflects a broader push to guarantee that every aircraft meets the highest safety benchmarks, especially after such a devastating accident.

Despite the troubling mid-air episode on June 1, Air India’s swift response and continued emphasis on regulatory compliance appear to have helped reassure both passengers and authorities. The airline is now working closely with aviation regulators to ensure that any emerging issues are identified and addressed promptly.

In summary, while the door-related disturbance on flight AI-314 did not lead to any injuries or deviations from the flight plan, it serves as a reminder of the challenges airlines face in maintaining passenger confidence amid heightened scrutiny. The incident, together with the ongoing investigations and safety checks, underlines the aviation industry’s need for constant vigilance and transparency.

By taking proactive steps, such as thorough fleet inspections and public communication, Air India appears determined to maintain its operational integrity and customer trust in a period marked by public anxiety and regulatory oversight.

Connecticut Officially Declares Diwali a State Holiday in Landmark Move

June 23, 2025June 24, 2025 Staff ReporterCommunity, Religion 0

The State of Connecticut has formally recognized Diwali, the vibrant Hindu festival of lights, as an official state holiday. This historic designation marks a significant milestone for the Indian-American community in the state, which has long hoped for broader recognition of its cultural and religious traditions.

The new law declaring Diwali a state holiday was met with unanimous approval from Connecticut’s legislature, signaling widespread support across political lines. Earlier this month, the bill was signed into law by the governor, cementing Diwali’s place in the state’s calendar of officially recognized holidays.

Diwali, also known as Deepavali, is a religious celebration deeply rooted in Hinduism, but also observed by Buddhists and Sikhs. Among Hindus, it holds the status of the most important and widely celebrated holiday, marking the victory of light over darkness and good over evil. The festival typically spans five days, with the third day regarded as the most significant. This year, that pivotal day of celebration will occur on October 20.

The driving force behind Connecticut’s decision to officially recognize Diwali was Rajeev Pahuja, a passionate advocate from the Indian-American community. Pahuja not only drafted the legislation but also led the charge in lobbying lawmakers to pass the bill. He emphasized the broader impact this move would have for future generations of Indian-Americans living in the state.

“I wanted future generations to be valued and seen in the State of Connecticut,” Pahuja stated, pointing to the growing influence and size of the Indian community in the region. According to him, the formal recognition of Diwali is not the final goal, but rather a stepping stone toward making the festival a public holiday—one where both schools and businesses close to allow families the time to celebrate fully.

“A state holiday is the first step in the journey to making Diwali a public holiday in Connecticut,” Pahuja explained. His vision extends beyond symbolic acknowledgment and aims for practical inclusion, allowing Indian-American families the space and time to observe their cultural traditions without needing to take time off from work or school.

For Pahuja, the official recognition is a deeply personal victory as well as a collective triumph for the community. “It’s a wonderful feeling to be the second state,” he said, referencing New York, which was the first state to make Diwali an official holiday. “I think this is a huge milestone for the state of Connecticut.”

While Connecticut has now joined a growing list of places that officially recognize Diwali, some of its school districts were already ahead of the curve. Districts such as South Windsor and Avon had previously declared Diwali an official school holiday, giving students and families the day off to celebrate. These local decisions paved the way for broader state-level action and showcased how individual school boards can respond proactively to the needs of their communities.

The holiday is not only significant from a spiritual and religious standpoint but also from a cultural and social one. Indian-American businesses often see a surge in activity during the Diwali season. For example, Haveli India, a popular Indian restaurant located in Middletown, experiences a notable uptick in visitors and celebrations during the holiday. Krishna Pandey, the owner of the restaurant, compared Diwali’s importance to other major American holidays.

“It’s like Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year’s all rolled into one,” Pandey said, illustrating the emotional and communal impact of the festival. The holiday serves as a time for reunion, reflection, and festivity, resonating with themes familiar to Americans regardless of cultural background.

Religious institutions also play a key role in Diwali observances across Connecticut. The Sri Satyanarayana Swamy Temple in Middletown, for instance, hosts elaborate celebrations every year to honor the occasion. Central to the festivities are prayers dedicated to Goddess Lakshmi, who is revered in Hinduism as the deity of wealth and prosperity. Worshippers gather to offer prayers, share meals, and take part in traditional rituals such as lighting candles or diyas, which are small oil lamps typically made from clay.

The lighting of these lamps holds deep spiritual significance and is symbolic of the triumph of light over darkness. Pavan Panganamamula, who serves as president of the Connecticut Valley Hindu Temple Society, emphasized the deeper meaning behind this practice.

“Lighting of a lamp is considered to be a life,” said Panganamamula. “You light a lamp for long life rather than a shortness.” His words echo a central tenet of Diwali—that light brings hope, longevity, and clarity to the human experience.

As Diwali celebrations continue to gain momentum and recognition across the United States, Connecticut’s move is expected to inspire similar efforts in other states. The acknowledgment of Diwali not only validates the importance of cultural inclusion but also affirms the contributions of the Indian-American community to the social fabric of the state.

With October 20 approaching as the main day of Diwali celebrations this year, communities across Connecticut are preparing for a festival that now carries an extra layer of pride and legitimacy. Thanks to advocates like Rajeev Pahuja and supportive legislators, the holiday is no longer just a family tradition or local event—it is now a recognized part of Connecticut’s cultural and civic identity.

By enshrining Diwali as a state holiday, Connecticut is making a powerful statement about the value of cultural diversity and the importance of honoring the traditions of all its residents. As the flicker of clay lamps brightens homes and temples across the state this October, many will celebrate not just the holiday itself, but also the recognition, respect, and sense of belonging that now accompany it.

India Must Call for Peace: Congress Condemns Israel’s Strike on Iran and Urges Diplomatic Resolution

June 23, 2025June 24, 2025 Staff ReporterIndia 0

On June 13, 2025, a new chapter of geopolitical unrest unfolded when Israel launched a controversial and unlawful strike on Iran, blatantly violating Iranian sovereignty. This military act, which further deepens the instability of the West Asian region, has triggered global concern and condemnation, including from India’s principal opposition party, the Indian National Congress. The party denounced the targeted assassinations and bombings carried out on Iranian territory, calling it a dangerous provocation with severe consequences both regionally and globally.

The Congress party’s criticism places this strike within a larger pattern of Israel’s recent military campaigns, notably its forceful offensive in Gaza. According to the party, Israel continues to show blatant disregard for civilian life and regional stability. “These actions will only deepen instability and sow the seeds of further conflict,” the party warned, expressing concern over the ripple effects of escalating tensions.

What makes this development even more alarming is its timing. Diplomatic discussions between Iran and the United States had shown encouraging progress earlier in the year, with five rounds of negotiations already completed and a sixth scheduled for June. The hope for de-escalation was further reinforced when, in March 2025, U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified before Congress, stating unequivocally that Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons. Gabbard emphasized that Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, had not authorized the resumption of any nuclear weapons program since its suspension in 2003.

These diplomatic efforts now stand jeopardized due to the current Israeli administration’s preference for confrontation over dialogue. Under the leadership of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel has consistently undermined prospects for peace, while encouraging a culture of extremism. His government’s continued expansion of illegal settlements, alignment with far-right nationalist groups, and obstruction of the two-state solution have inflicted immense suffering on Palestinians and exacerbated regional unrest.

The Congress party did not hesitate to highlight Netanyahu’s historical role in derailing peace efforts. They pointed out that he played a role in stoking animosity that culminated in the 1995 assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, which effectively ended a promising peace initiative between Israelis and Palestinians.

In light of this track record, it is unsurprising to observers that Netanyahu’s response to tensions with Iran has taken the form of military escalation. However, what has particularly dismayed the Congress party is the apparent endorsement of this path by U.S. President Donald Trump. Once a vocal critic of America’s “endless wars” and the influence of the military-industrial complex, Trump now seems willing to tread the same course he once condemned. The party noted the irony that Trump, who frequently decried the false pretext of weapons of mass destruction used to justify the Iraq War, is now dismissing his own intelligence chief’s statements about Iran.

Trump’s assertion on June 17 that Iran was “very close” to acquiring nuclear weapons was met with concern. According to the Congress, such rhetoric is not only unsubstantiated but also reckless. “The world expects and needs leadership that is grounded in facts and driven by diplomacy, and not by force or falsehoods,” the party stressed.

Although Israel’s fears of a nuclear-armed Iran are not baseless, the Congress maintained that international standards must be applied consistently. “There can be no room for double standards,” it stated, pointing out that Israel is itself a nuclear weapons state with a history of military aggression. Iran, by contrast, remains a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and had, under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), accepted strict limitations on its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. The agreement was supported by the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, Germany, and the European Union, and was verified by international monitors—until the U.S. unilaterally withdrew in 2018.

That decision, the Congress argues, undid years of meticulous diplomacy and once again imperiled a region already teetering on instability. India, too, has not escaped the consequences. The reimposed sanctions severely hampered India’s ability to develop key infrastructure projects with Iran, such as the International North-South Transport Corridor and the Chabahar Port, both seen as critical to India’s access to Central Asia and Afghanistan.

Beyond strategic calculations, Iran has been a long-standing friend of India, sharing deep civilizational ties and standing by New Delhi at pivotal moments. For instance, in 1994, Iran played a crucial role in blocking a resolution critical of India at the UN Commission on Human Rights concerning Kashmir. This support contrasts with the alignment of the former Imperial State of Iran, which leaned toward Pakistan during the 1965 and 1971 wars.

At the same time, India has developed robust strategic ties with Israel. This unique diplomatic position, according to the Congress, places India in an ideal spot to act as a mediator and peacebuilder. This is not merely a theoretical argument. With lakhs of Indian nationals living and working across West Asia, peace in the region is a matter of urgent national interest.

Despite this, Israel’s recent strikes have taken place under a veil of impunity, aided by near-blanket support from powerful Western nations. While the Congress party had earlier unequivocally condemned the brutal October 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas as “absolutely horrific and totally unacceptable,” they asserted that remaining silent in the face of Israel’s overwhelming and disproportionate retaliation would be morally indefensible. Over 55,000 Palestinians have reportedly been killed in these reprisals. “Entire families, neighbourhoods, and even hospitals have been obliterated,” they noted. Gaza, they warned, is teetering on the edge of famine, and its people continue to endure unimaginable suffering.

In this backdrop, the Congress sharply criticized the Indian government’s current position. They accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration of turning its back on India’s traditional commitment to a peaceful two-state solution, one which envisions a sovereign Palestinian state living in peace alongside Israel. According to the Congress, the Modi government’s silence on the destruction in Gaza and now on Israel’s strike against Iran is a worrying departure from India’s moral and diplomatic legacy. “This represents not just a loss of voice but also a surrender of values,” they cautioned.

Nevertheless, the Congress maintained that India could still play a constructive role. They called upon the Indian government to act with urgency, use every available diplomatic channel, and reassert its commitment to peace in West Asia. “It is still not too late. India must speak clearly, act responsibly, and use every diplomatic channel available to defuse tensions and promote a return to dialogue in West Asia,” the statement concluded.

Yoga Day at Times Square Draws 10,000 Participants in a Grand Celebration of Wellness

June 23, 2025June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterCulture 0

In a vibrant display of cultural unity and wellness, the Consulate General of India in New York, in collaboration with the Times Square Alliance, hosted the 11th International Day of Yoga at the iconic Times Square on June 20, 2025. The event, known as ‘Solstice at Times Square’, turned one of the busiest intersections in the world into a massive open-air yoga studio, drawing around 10,000 yoga practitioners of various nationalities.

The day-long program was a testament to the growing popularity and deep-rooted presence of yoga in American society. Featuring seven distinct yoga sessions, the event allowed people from different backgrounds to unite through the ancient Indian practice that promotes physical, mental, and spiritual wellness. The participation reflected the widespread enthusiasm for yoga in New York City and throughout the United States.

The Consul General of India addressed the large gathering, welcoming all participants and emphasizing the significance of yoga in today’s world. He spoke about how yoga contributes to both physical health and spiritual wellness. Furthermore, he underscored its unique ability to foster a deeper connection with nature. By promoting holistic health and encouraging sustainable living, yoga aligns closely with global goals for wellness and environmental harmony.

Adding a special dimension to this year’s celebration was the presence of acclaimed actor Anupam Kher. With a distinguished career spanning over 35 years, Kher brought star power and a heartfelt message to the stage. He spoke about the transformative power of yoga and its potential to bring about global healing. “From the stillness of a single breath rises the strength to heal the whole world,” he said, capturing the essence of the practice and its potential to contribute to a more peaceful and healthy world.

The celebration of yoga at Times Square was held in anticipation of the official International Day of Yoga on June 21, a date that coincides with the Summer Solstice—the longest day of the year in the Northern Hemisphere. This year’s global observance of Yoga Day is themed ‘Yoga for One Earth, One Health’. The theme reflects yoga’s role in promoting planetary health and individual well-being, reinforcing its relevance in an age where interconnected health and environmental challenges are at the forefront.

This 11th annual celebration continues a tradition that began when the United Nations adopted a resolution in December 2014 to mark June 21 as International Day of Yoga. The resolution, spearheaded by India, received unanimous support from the UN General Assembly, recognizing yoga’s universal appeal. Since its inception in 2015, the day has grown into a worldwide celebration, with millions participating in yoga sessions and wellness events each year. The objective remains clear—to raise awareness about the multifaceted benefits of yoga and to inspire more people to adopt it as a way of life.

Yoga, which originated in ancient India, has evolved into a global movement for health and inner peace. By encouraging mindful living, yoga has found a special place in modern urban settings like New York, where the fast pace of life often leads to stress and physical strain. Events like the one at Times Square help people reconnect with their inner selves and take a moment to slow down and breathe, even in the heart of a bustling metropolis.

In addition to the main event at Times Square, the Consulate General of India in New York has planned a month-long series of yoga-related activities across the states falling under its jurisdiction. These include New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Connecticut. The outreach program has received strong support from local communities and yoga organizations, with active participation from yoga enthusiasts of all ages and backgrounds.

These regional events serve to expand the reach of the International Day of Yoga and make its benefits accessible to more people. The Consulate’s initiative reflects India’s commitment to sharing its ancient wellness traditions with the world while also fostering stronger cultural ties between nations.

Each session at the Times Square celebration was led by expert instructors and focused on different aspects of yoga, including asanas (postures), pranayama (breathing techniques), and meditation. Participants stretched, breathed, and meditated under the open sky, turning a usually chaotic corner of New York into a peaceful haven. Many attendees noted the surreal experience of practicing yoga amid the towering skyscrapers and electronic billboards that define Times Square.

The visual spectacle of thousands of yoga mats laid out in perfect rows added a layer of symbolism to the event—representing unity, discipline, and shared purpose. As the sun moved across the sky, participants adjusted their poses and energy levels, creating a rhythm that mirrored the flow of nature itself.

The event not only highlighted yoga’s adaptability to diverse urban environments but also served as a reminder of the universal nature of well-being. “Yoga is not just a workout, it’s a work-in,” one participant remarked, echoing a sentiment that was felt by many present at the venue.

With support from the Times Square Alliance, the logistics and management of the event ensured a smooth experience for all involved. From registration to crowd management, the collaboration between the Consulate and local authorities demonstrated how large-scale cultural events can be organized effectively even in high-traffic urban zones.

The involvement of Indian dignitaries, American yoga organizations, and celebrity advocates added credibility and appeal to the event. It also reflected the soft power of cultural diplomacy in strengthening India-U.S. relations, using a common language of health and wellness.

As the world continues to grapple with challenges related to health, environment, and mental well-being, the role of yoga as a simple yet profound solution is gaining renewed importance. Events like the one at Times Square serve not only as celebrations but also as calls to action for people to prioritize their health and live in harmony with the planet.

By the end of the day, as the final yoga session wrapped up and the sun dipped below the skyline, the energy among participants was one of calm satisfaction and collective purpose. The 11th International Day of Yoga in New York had achieved its goal—not just in numbers, but in impact.

As Anupam Kher aptly stated, “From the stillness of a single breath rises the strength to heal the whole world.” The gathering at Times Square offered a powerful reminder that amidst the chaos of modern life, peace and health begin within.

Summer Solstice 2025: Eight Destinations Embracing the Longest Day of the Year with Ancient Rituals and Modern Merriment

June 23, 2025June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterEnvironment 0

Every year, the summer solstice marks a special astronomical event when one of the Earth’s poles is tilted most toward the sun. This results in the sun reaching its highest point in the sky, bringing with it the longest day of the year. For millennia, people have honored this event with celebrations that draw on ancient traditions. From the mysterious allure of Stonehenge to romantic folklore in Eastern Europe, the solstice has been a time of unity, celebration, and ritual.

In the Northern Hemisphere, the solstice typically falls on June 20, 21, or 22, and many cultures observe it through Midsummer festivities. Sweden is especially prominent in these celebrations, particularly since the release of the 2019 film Midsommar, which heightened American interest. However, across the world, people mark this celestial event in diverse and meaningful ways—from fiery displays in the Austrian Alps to symbolic rituals in Colombia.

Here are eight remarkable places to experience the summer solstice in 2025, including the dates and the unique cultural traditions associated with each location.

Stonehenge, United Kingdom – Saturday, June 21, 2025

At the ancient site of Stonehenge in Wiltshire, crowds gather every year to witness the sun rise above the prehistoric stones, which were intentionally arranged to align with the sun during solstices. This connection between the structure and the heavens has long fascinated archaeologists and spiritual seekers alike. The summer solstice draws thousands who wish to experience the power of the moment when night is shortest and the sun is at its peak. The event is spiritual and solemn, with rules to match: no alcohol is allowed except for ceremonial mead. “It’s believed that people have gathered here to mark the summer solstice for thousands of years,” making it one of the oldest continuous celebrations linked to the solstice.

Turov, Belarus – Sunday, July 6 to Monday, July 7, 2025

In Belarus, the summer solstice is commemorated with the festival of Ivan Kupala Day, a pagan celebration observed in various Eastern European countries. In the town of Turov, young women participate in a ritual that involves floating flower garlands, known as chaplets, on a river. The movement of these garlands is thought to offer insight into their romantic futures. This tradition mixes mysticism with love and youth, continuing an ancient belief system tied to nature and the rhythms of the earth. “The floating flowers are set off by young women, who try to gain insight into the future of their romantic relationships from the way they float.”

Denmark – Saturday, June 21, 2025

In Denmark, the summer solstice aligns with the observance of John the Baptist’s birth, which is said to have occurred six months prior to Jesus’. The Danes link the event with myth and folklore, particularly the belief that witches travel to the Brocken, a mountain peak in Germany, during this time. The fusion of Christian and pagan traditions makes Denmark’s Midsummer festivities both religious and mythical in tone. It is a time when bonfires light up the landscape and folklore becomes vividly alive.

Sweden – Saturday, June 21, 2025

Sweden’s Midsummer celebration is perhaps one of the most recognizable solstice traditions worldwide. People gather in the countryside to raise and dance around flower-decorated maypoles, celebrating life, fertility, and the arrival of summer. Afterward, classic Swedish foods like pickled herrings and aquavit are enjoyed. Public parks across Sweden host outdoor events, complete with traditional folk costumes and music. For the most authentic experience, travelers can visit Dalarna County, a hub of traditional festivities. Or, for a more unique atmosphere, they can chase the Midnight Sun in Riksgränsen. “In Sweden, flower-covered maypoles are put up in the countryside for revelers to dance around—followed by classic snacks of pickled herrings and aquavit.”

Berga, Spain – Saturday, June 21, 2025

In the Catalan region of Spain, particularly in the town of Berga near Barcelona, locals take part in a summer solstice celebration that harks back to medieval times. Participants dress up as mythical or religious characters, donning oversized ‘big head’ masks that contribute to the surreal and festive ambiance. This traditional event weaves together history, religion, and performance, showcasing Spain’s deep-rooted cultural heritage. “The townspeople of Berga… dress up as mystical or religious characters with typical ‘big head’ masks in a celebration that dates back to the Middle Ages.”

Tyrol, Austria – Saturday, June 21, 2025

High in the Austrian Alps, in the region of Tyrol, the summer solstice is marked with breathtaking fire displays. Locals light up to 8,000 fires across the Mieminger mountain range and beyond. These flames form effigies and symbols inspired by religion, mythology, nature, and even contemporary events. What makes this event particularly exciting is the secrecy surrounding the designs, which are only revealed when the fires are ignited at sunset. As twilight descends on Innsbruck and surrounding areas, the mountains glow with the light of fire, transforming the landscape into a spiritual canvas. “The details are kept a secret until the evening of the summer solstice. As the sun sets, fires will be lit in Innsbruck and beyond.”

Finland – Saturday, June 21, 2025

In Finland, the Midsummer period is referred to as the “white nights,” as the sky barely darkens. Historically, this was a time for fertility spells and mystical practices aimed at enhancing life and love. Today, one of the key solstice rituals is sauna bathing—a deeply ingrained part of Finnish culture that symbolizes purification and renewal. Bonfires remain a part of the tradition too, serving as both a connection to the past and a centerpiece for social gatherings. “Bonfires are lit, a throwback to hundreds of years ago when spells to increase fertility were cast by local people. Now, sauna bathing is a popular summer solstice ritual.”

Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia – Friday, June 20, 2025

In Colombia’s Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, the solstice coincides with the religious festival of Corpus Christi. The event takes a dramatic turn as locals dress as devils, adorned with numerous tiny bells around their legs. Mirrors are strapped to their backs to capture the sun’s energy on the longest day of the year. The ritual is symbolic, representing the age-old conflict between good and evil. These vivid costumes and energetic performances reflect the unique blend of Catholic and indigenous beliefs in the region. “They wear mirrors on their backs to harness the power of the sun on the longest day of the year. The ritual represents the fight between God and the Devil.”

From solemn rites in ancient stone circles to lively parades and bonfire rituals, the summer solstice in 2025 promises to be a powerful and enriching experience around the globe. Each location offers its own distinct interpretation of this timeless celestial event, blending mythology, religion, romance, and community into one unforgettable day.

US Updates Travel Advisories, Highlights Increased Caution for India and Dominican Republic

June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterGlobal, Travel 0

Over the past month, the U.S. State Department has revised several travel advisories affecting American citizens planning trips abroad. While some countries saw minimal adjustments, others—particularly India, Cuba, and the Dominican Republic—were subject to more specific and cautionary guidance, reflecting evolving global and regional developments under the current Trump administration.

Among the unchanged but updated countries is Switzerland, which retained its Level 1 travel rating—the safest classification on the State Department’s four-tier advisory scale. Minor changes were added for 2025, but no significant increase in risk was noted.

In contrast, the advisory levels for Cuba and the Dominican Republic were both raised, drawing distinct attention. The Dominican Republic, for instance, received a Level 2 rating accompanied by a more explicit warning about violent crime, despite the government’s efforts to enhance police presence in popular tourist areas. According to the June 18 advisory update, “Violent crime is a concern in the Dominican Republic despite more police presence in areas often visited by tourists.” The advisory also emphasized, “Do not display wealth and be wary of meeting individuals from online in secluded locations.”

India, another country that has drawn increased scrutiny, was also moved to a Level 2 rating as of June 16. This classification, labeled “exercise increased caution,” is the same level currently designated for several prominent European nations, including France and Italy. The Level 4 category, by contrast, is reserved for countries either actively at war or those without diplomatic ties to the United States.

The updated U.S. guidance for India flagged specific regions that American travelers should entirely avoid, particularly those areas where ongoing political or military tensions pose heightened risks. Among these is the northern region of Jammu and Kashmir, as well as the area along the eastern border with Pakistan. These warnings follow a series of hostile engagements between Indian and Pakistani forces, including a missile strike by India in early May on the Pakistani-controlled side of Kashmir. That military response was triggered by an April 22 attack that left 25 tourists dead in Indian-administered territory.

“Exercise increased caution in India due to crime and terrorism,” the updated advisory for India states. “Some areas have increased risk. Rape is one of the fastest-growing crimes in India. Violent crimes, including sexual assault, happen at tourist sites and other locations.”

Beyond the well-known conflict zones, other regions within India, such as Maharashtra and Telangana, have also been flagged for caution. These areas have occasionally experienced attacks targeting the Indian government, attributed to extremist factions operating in the country.

Further additions to the advisory include warnings related to the Indian government’s strict enforcement of immigration laws, especially for travelers entering the country from nearby nations such as Nepal and Pakistan—countries with which India has had tense relations. The U.S. State Department cautions that failing to comply with India’s entry requirements could have serious consequences.

“Violations of Indian immigration laws are taken very seriously,” the travel guidance warns. “India may imprison, fine, or deny entry to travelers without valid documents or the correct type of visa.”

Interestingly, this firm approach to immigration enforcement is mirrored in travel advisories issued by other countries about the United States itself. The Trump administration’s focus on restricting immigration and enforcing border regulations has led multiple foreign governments to issue their own stern warnings to citizens intending to visit the U.S.

Germany, for example, issued a notice through its Foreign Ministry in March 2025 outlining the legal risks associated with travel to the U.S. “A criminal conviction in the United States, false information regarding the purpose of stay, or even a slight overstay of the visa upon entry or exit can lead to arrest, detention, and deportation upon entry or exit,” the German advisory cautioned.

Similarly, the Canadian government has taken steps to inform its citizens about potential complications at U.S. borders. “Individual border agents often have significant discretion in making those determinations,” reads the Canadian government’s latest guidance. “U.S. authorities strictly enforce entry requirements. Expect scrutiny at ports of entry, including of electronic devices.”

These global travel advisory exchanges underscore a rising trend: countries are not only warning their citizens about conflict zones or crime in far-flung areas, but they are also providing detailed information about legal risks associated with immigration policy enforcement, even in countries historically considered safe travel destinations.

For the U.S., this more detailed advisory framework aims to help travelers make informed decisions about where they are going and what precautions they should take. Whether the risks are related to crime, terrorism, or complex immigration policies, the updated advisories reflect an increasingly interconnected world where political tensions, security issues, and border regulations all play a role in shaping how and where people move.

In the case of India, the U.S. has signaled that while much of the country remains relatively safe for travelers exercising basic precautions, certain regions are fraught with danger due to ongoing conflict and criminal activity. The explicit mention of sexual violence, including rape, as a growing problem reflects the serious safety concerns that have been the subject of international attention in recent years.

Similarly, the Dominican Republic’s inclusion of warnings about displaying wealth or meeting unknown persons in secluded areas shows a responsiveness to patterns of criminal activity that may target tourists. These changes demonstrate how travel advisories are now offering more than just general safety tips—they are responding to specific events, local dynamics, and broader geopolitical shifts.

As the Trump administration continues to reshape aspects of U.S. foreign policy and immigration enforcement, it’s likely that both American advisories about other countries and foreign warnings about travel to the U.S. will keep evolving. For travelers, this means paying close attention to official notices before booking a flight—not only to understand the risks abroad, but also to navigate changing border requirements and legal expectations at home and overseas.

B-2 Bombers Moved to Guam as Trump Considers U.S. Involvement in Israel-Iran Conflict

June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterDiplomacy, World 0

U.S. Department of Defense officials have begun relocating B-2 bombers across the Pacific Ocean, a move that comes as President Donald Trump deliberates potential American intervention in the intensifying conflict between Israel and Iran. These developments were reported by Reuters, which noted that powerful “bunker buster bombs,” each weighing around 30,000 pounds, are being transported to the U.S. territory of Guam. This location could serve as a launch point if Trump decides to take military action against Iran.

The Department of Defense redirected inquiries from The Hill to the White House, which has yet to issue a formal response or provide further clarification regarding the deployment and the president’s current stance.

Recent flight data supports the growing speculation surrounding U.S. military movements. Several aircraft were seen departing from Travis Air Force Base, located in California. These flights included B-2 stealth bombers, departing shortly after Trump publicly announced a two-week deadline to determine whether the United States will intervene militarily in Iran. It’s worth noting that the U.S. Air Force possesses the capability to deactivate transponders on these aircraft, allowing their movements to remain untracked and covert when necessary.

Until recently, these strategic bombers were stationed in Missouri. Military analysts suggest that they may now be positioned for potential strikes against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. One particular target of interest appears to be the Fordo nuclear enrichment facility, a hardened underground site that poses a significant challenge for conventional weaponry but could be vulnerable to the immense power of the bunker busters.

The Fordo site is Iran’s second major nuclear facility after the Natanz complex. Natanz was recently attacked by Israeli forces in a move that visibly escalated the ongoing hostilities between the two countries. According to reports, the strike caused considerable damage to the facility, marking another step in Israel’s broader objective of dismantling Iran’s nuclear weapons development program.

Just one day after the Natanz attack, Israel reported further military action. The Israeli government confirmed that it had launched a strike on a different Iranian nuclear site located in Isfahan. In addition to damaging critical infrastructure, Israeli forces also claimed to have eliminated two high-ranking Iranian commanders during the assault. This act further inflamed the tensions between the two nations.

Later on the same day, the Israeli Air Force targeted additional military infrastructure in southwestern Iran. These operations were detailed in a formal statement issued by the Israeli military. The statement emphasized the strategic nature of the attacks and pointed to Israel’s intention to continue targeting locations that may be connected to Iran’s weapons programs.

The strikes followed an aggressive move by Iran just hours earlier. According to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Iran had launched 40 drones during the night between Friday and Saturday. Israeli defense systems intercepted the drones before they could reach their targets, neutralizing the threat and avoiding significant damage.

An Israeli military official, speaking to the Associated Press on the condition of anonymity, explained the impact of Israel’s countermeasures: “We’ve been able to take out a large amount of their launchers, creating a bottleneck — we’re making it harder for them to fire toward Israel.” However, the official also offered a sobering assessment of Iran’s capabilities, adding, “Having said all that, I want to say the Iranian regime obviously still has capabilities.”

In addition to the strikes and drone interceptions, Israeli forces recently claimed to have killed several top Iranian commanders and nine engineers who were allegedly involved in Iran’s nuclear program. The targeting of these individuals is viewed as a direct effort to cripple Iran’s ability to make progress on its nuclear ambitions.

As the conflict intensifies, President Trump has taken a firm position. He declared that hostilities will persist until Iran agrees to a full surrender. “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER” was the phrase he used to describe the only acceptable outcome from the United States’ perspective. His strong rhetoric underscores the gravity of the situation and hints at the scale of the response that may follow if Iran does not comply.

Despite the growing pressure, Iran’s leadership has vowed to continue its resistance. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei addressed the Iranian people through a message posted on X, formerly known as Twitter. In it, he urged the nation to stand strong in the face of adversity.

“I would like to tell our dear nation that if the enemy senses that you fear them, they won’t let go of you. Continue the very behavior that you have had up to this day; continue this behavior with strength,” Khamenei wrote.

His statement suggests that Iran is unlikely to capitulate, even in the face of growing international pressure and escalating military actions. The message was aimed at rallying national support and reinforcing the narrative of resilience against foreign intervention.

The current military posturing, including the movement of U.S. bombers and intensified Israeli strikes, points to a rapidly evolving situation in the Middle East. Trump’s decision in the coming weeks may have significant consequences not only for U.S.-Iran relations but also for the broader geopolitical stability of the region.

Analysts warn that any direct involvement by the United States could mark a turning point in the conflict, transforming it from a bilateral clash between Israel and Iran into a wider confrontation with global implications. The presence of U.S. bombers on Guam and the strategic nature of their potential deployment only adds weight to this possibility.

While Israel appears determined to neutralize what it sees as a growing nuclear threat, and Iran remains defiant in its response, the role of the United States remains the most critical variable. The next two weeks could be pivotal in determining whether diplomacy has any chance to prevail or if the world must brace for a larger military confrontation.

With President Trump’s deadline approaching, the eyes of the world are on Washington. The movement of B-2 bombers and the transportation of powerful bunker buster bombs to Guam are more than just logistical maneuvers; they are a clear signal that the United States is preparing for all possibilities — including war.

NATO Summit Trimmed and Tailored to Appease Trump as Rutte Aims for Unity Amid Deep Divisions

June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterDiplomacy, Global 0

NATO summits are typically designed to present a united front, with outcomes largely predetermined in advance. The upcoming summit at The Hague, orchestrated by newly appointed NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, is no exception. In fact, the event appears to be carefully planned to avoid any confrontations with NATO’s most influential member, the United States. The core item on the agenda is a pledge by European allies to increase their defence spending—precisely what President Donald Trump has long demanded.

While this commitment is expected to take center stage, it comes with a mix of compromises and vague concessions. However, even a carefully managed summit cannot entirely obscure the ongoing rifts between Trump and many European leaders over issues like trade, Russia, and the deepening Middle East conflict.

Donald Trump, with his “America First” doctrine, has never been particularly enthusiastic about multinational institutions. His skepticism extends to NATO itself. During his first term, he not only criticized the alliance but also questioned its very foundation: collective defence. At his inaugural NATO summit, he openly scolded European allies for underfunding their militaries and claimed they owed the U.S. “massive amounts of money.” On that front, Trump has maintained a consistent stance throughout his political career.

Mark Rutte, known for maintaining a positive relationship with Trump, has made considerable efforts to deliver a diplomatic victory for the U.S. president. The upcoming NATO gathering will take place over two days—Tuesday and Wednesday next week—at the World Forum in The Hague. But the main deliberations will be brief, lasting just three hours, and the concluding summit declaration will be reduced to a mere five paragraphs. This minimalism is reportedly a response to Trump’s preferences.

Trump will be joined by 31 other leaders from NATO’s member states, along with representatives from more than a dozen partner countries. In preparation, Dutch authorities have launched the most extensive security operation in the country’s history, with the event’s cost reaching €183.4 million ($210 million or £155 million), making it the most expensive NATO summit ever.

Some observers suggest the abbreviated schedule is tailored to Trump’s reported short attention span and aversion to lengthy meetings. However, beyond catering to Trump, the short agenda also serves a strategic purpose—it limits the range of topics and helps conceal internal divisions within the alliance.

Ed Arnold, a defense analyst from the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), commented on Trump’s dominant presence at such events: “Trump likes to be the star of the show,” adding that he will likely take credit for pressuring European countries to act on defense. While Trump isn’t the first American president to criticize NATO spending habits, he has arguably had greater success than his predecessors.

Former U.S. Ambassador to NATO, Kurt Volker, acknowledged the tension: “Some European governments do not like the way Trump’s gone about it,” referencing Trump’s call for nations to spend 5% of their GDP on defense. Presently, Europe contributes just 30% of NATO’s total military spending. Yet, according to Volker, many Europeans have come to realize, “we needed to do this, even if it’s unfortunate that it took such a kick in the pants.”

Indeed, some European countries are now pushing their defense budgets toward that 5% target. These include nations near Russia, such as Poland, Estonia, and Lithuania. But the pressure is not solely coming from Washington. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has fundamentally shifted the security outlook across Europe, demanding increased defense commitments.

Nevertheless, the reality is that many NATO members are unlikely to meet these lofty new spending goals. Some have still failed to achieve the 2% GDP target established over a decade ago. Rutte has proposed a compromise: raising core defense spending to 3.5% of GDP, supplemented by an additional 1.5% in related expenditures.

However, the definition of “defense-related expenditure” remains so ambiguous that critics worry it could be manipulated. Rutte has suggested that infrastructure investments—such as roads, bridges, and railways—could count toward this total. As RUSI’s Ed Arnold noted, this will almost certainly lead to more “creative accounting.”

Even if this new benchmark is endorsed, many nations may only offer symbolic compliance, without serious plans to meet it by 2032 or 2035. The timeline remains hazy. Spain’s prime minister has already condemned the target as “unreasonable and counterproductive.” Meanwhile, British Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has avoided committing to a firm timeline for reaching 3% GDP spending. The current UK prime minister has only described it as an “ambition” for the next parliamentary term. Still, given the UK’s stated intent to place NATO at the center of its defense policy, Starmer may be compelled to support the new spending framework.

The danger lies in seeing the spending increase as just a political move, or simply yielding to U.S. demands. But NATO’s own internal defense strategies—particularly concerning potential aggression from Russia—are also a major motivator. Rutte himself has issued a stark warning: Russia could launch an attack on a NATO country within five years.

Though the full scope of NATO’s defense plans remains classified, Rutte has already indicated what is lacking. In a speech earlier this month, he said NATO requires “a 400% increase in its air and missile defences,” along with “thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks, and millions more artillery shells.”

Most member countries, including the UK, currently fall short of NATO’s capability targets. Consequently, Sweden has announced plans to double the size of its army, and Germany aims to expand its troop numbers by 60,000. NATO’s plans reportedly outline detailed procedures to defend the alliance’s eastern border in the event of a Russian invasion. General Christopher Donahue, head of the U.S. Army in Europe, recently highlighted the vulnerability of Polish and Lithuanian territory near the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad. He revealed, “we looked at our existing capabilities and realized very quickly they are not sufficient.”

Yet ironically, direct discussions about Russia and the war in Ukraine will be kept to a minimum at the summit. This reflects growing divergence between Europe and America on the issue. Kurt Volker observed, “Under Trump, the US does not see Ukrainian security as essential to European security but our European allies do.”

Trump has already eroded NATO unity by engaging with Vladimir Putin and suspending military aid to Ukraine. According to Ed Arnold, contentious subjects like Russia strategy have been deliberately excluded from the agenda to avoid provoking Trump.

Although Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has received an invitation to the summit dinner, he won’t be participating in the North Atlantic Council’s main discussions.

As Mark Rutte prepares to lead his first NATO summit, he likely hopes for a smooth and concise event. But given Trump’s fundamental disagreements with many of his allies—especially regarding Russia, NATO’s greatest strategic concern—the summit could still fall short of unity and coherence, despite efforts to the contrary.

Air India Temporarily Cuts Key U.S. and International Routes Amid Safety and Operational Challenges

June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterNation, Travel 0

Air India has announced a temporary reduction in its long-haul international flight operations starting June 21, directly affecting several major U.S.-bound routes from Delhi. The decision comes amid ongoing safety reviews, aircraft inspections, and staffing constraints, all of which have contributed to a significant scaling back of the airline’s international services.

Among the most prominent changes are reductions to three of Air India’s key U.S. routes. The frequency of the Delhi–San Francisco flights will be cut from ten per week to seven. Similarly, the Delhi–Chicago route will drop from seven to just three weekly flights, while the Delhi–Washington Dulles service will be trimmed from five to three per week.

The airline officially stated, “To maintain operational resilience and reduce the risk of last-minute disruptions, we have made the difficult decision to temporarily reduce widebody international flying by 15 percent.” This move is intended to ensure that more aircraft are held in reserve to deal with unexpected issues. The statement continued, “This effectively adds to our reserve aircraft availability to take care of any unplanned disruptions.”

On June 19, the airline released a revised schedule that outlined further cutbacks on international routes beyond the United States. Flights between Delhi and Canada have also been affected. The Delhi–Toronto route, which previously had 13 weekly flights, will now be reduced to seven. Similarly, Delhi–Vancouver services will drop from seven to five per week.

European destinations are also experiencing cutbacks. Flights operating between Delhi and cities such as London (Heathrow), Paris, Milan, and Amsterdam have all been scaled back, though specific frequency reductions were not mentioned in the announcement.

In addition to these reductions, some international routes are being suspended altogether. These include the Delhi–Nairobi service, Amritsar–London (Gatwick), and Goa (Mopa)–London (Gatwick) flights. Other regions seeing fewer flights include Australia, Japan, and South Korea, although the airline has not yet provided detailed schedules for these areas.

Air India has stated that affected passengers are being contacted directly and are being offered a choice of alternate flights, free rescheduling options, or full refunds. The updated flight schedule is being gradually uploaded to the airline’s official platforms, including its website, mobile application, and customer contact centre.

The widespread changes come shortly after a tragic incident involving Air India Flight AI171 on June 12. The aircraft crashed near Ahmedabad, resulting in the loss of 241 lives. In light of the tragedy, Air India has emphasized the need to increase pre-flight safety checks and make operational changes to adjust for longer flight durations that have resulted from airspace closures in the Middle East.

The crash has triggered extensive regulatory oversight. Following the incident, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), India’s civil aviation authority, directed Air India to undertake enhanced safety inspections of its widebody aircraft fleet. The scrutiny has primarily focused on the airline’s fleet of Boeing 787 Dreamliners. As of June 19, only 26 out of the airline’s 33 Dreamliners had successfully cleared safety checks and were back in service. Inspections are also underway for the airline’s Boeing 777 aircraft.

These safety inspections have further strained the airline’s operations, contributing to a growing number of flight cancellations. In the past week alone, Air India reported the cancellation of 83 international flights. The airline has attributed these disruptions to a mix of engineering caution and a shortage of available crew.

An investigation into the cause of the AI171 crash is ongoing and is being led by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB). The inquiry is being conducted under the supervision of the DGCA and is receiving technical support from multiple international agencies. These include the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), as well as aircraft manufacturer Boeing and engine manufacturer GE Aerospace.

While the investigation continues, Air India is taking a cautious approach to its global flight operations. By temporarily reducing its long-haul international flights, the airline aims to prioritize passenger safety and ensure operational stability.

Despite the scale of the cutbacks, Air India has maintained that the changes are temporary and necessary under the circumstances. “This is a proactive measure to stabilize our schedule and avoid sudden cancellations that could inconvenience travelers,” an official familiar with the airline’s planning process stated.

The broader aviation industry in India is also closely watching the developments, especially in light of increased regulatory pressure on safety standards and maintenance protocols. The ongoing inspections and collaborative investigations are expected to influence how Indian airlines manage fleet readiness and emergency response measures moving forward.

For now, passengers are advised to check Air India’s official communication channels for the latest updates and flight rescheduling options. The airline is urging travelers to remain patient as it works through this complex phase of adjustments.

In summary, Air India’s temporary 15 percent reduction in widebody international operations reflects both an immediate response to a tragic crash and a broader strategy to fortify operational reliability. U.S. routes including those to San Francisco, Chicago, and Washington D.C. are among the most affected, alongside multiple routes to Canada, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific destinations. The airline continues to prioritize safety, compliance, and customer service as it navigates the aftermath of one of the most serious incidents in its recent history.

Pentagon Unveils Details of Stealth Bombing Campaign on Iranian Nuclear Sites, Hailing “Operation Midnight Hammer” as Historic

June 22, 2025June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA, World 0

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. military’s overnight assault on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure has been described as the largest B-2 bomber mission ever conducted, delivering what defense officials say was crippling damage to key targets. In a rare public briefing on Sunday, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine disclosed fresh insights into the covert operation, officially named Operation Midnight Hammer.

“This was one of the most classified and intricately coordinated missions we’ve ever executed,” Gen. Caine told reporters at the Pentagon, referring to the U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. “Very few within Washington were even aware of the plan’s timing or operational scope.”

According to Caine, seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers departed from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri under the cover of night, with a parallel group dispatched westward over the Pacific to create a diversion. The 18-hour eastward journey required multiple aerial refueling sessions as the aircraft flew across the Atlantic, through the Mediterranean, and into the Middle East.

Accompanied by fighter escorts and support planes, the strike package carried out what Caine described as a “precisely timed and synchronized maneuver” involving midair rendezvous and deception strategies. “This level of coordination was unprecedented,” he emphasized, presenting a map that detailed the aircraft’s flight path and timeline.

Deception and Precision: The Strike Timeline

At approximately 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Saturday, as the B-2s approached Iranian airspace, a U.S. Navy submarine launched over 24 Tomahawk cruise missiles toward the Isfahan complex. Meanwhile, fighter jets secured the airspace ahead, ensuring a clear path for the bombers.

At around 6:40 p.m. ET — 2:10 a.m. Sunday in Iran — the lead B-2 released two GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOPs), known colloquially as “bunker busters,” onto the Fordow facility. Over the next half hour, a total of 14 MOPs were dropped on Fordow and Natanz. The Tomahawks impacted Isfahan shortly afterward.

Caine confirmed that the operation went undetected by Iranian defenses. “No missiles were fired at our aircraft, and Iranian fighters never took off. Our element of surprise held throughout,” he stated.

In total, more than 125 U.S. aircraft contributed to the operation, including bombers, fighter jets, tankers, and surveillance units. Over 75 precision-guided munitions were deployed, resulting in what the Pentagon calls “extensive destruction.”

“Initial damage assessments indicate all three sites have suffered significant structural and functional losses,” said Caine, while noting that comprehensive evaluations are ongoing.

U.S. Forces on High Alert for Potential Iranian Response

Caine warned that any retaliation from Iran or its allied militias would be met with swift consequences. “Our readiness posture is elevated, and any misstep by Iran would be an ill-advised and dangerous move. We will defend our interests,” he said.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who stood beside Caine during the press conference, echoed the sentiment, describing the mission as an “overwhelming and calculated triumph.” He emphasized that the operation specifically avoided targeting Iranian personnel or civilian infrastructure.

“This was a mission with a singular purpose: to dismantle the core of Iran’s nuclear ambitions,” Hegseth said. “The president’s directive was clear and decisive, and our forces executed it flawlessly.”

Hegseth highlighted the historical scope of the mission, calling it the longest-range B-2 deployment since 2001 and the first use of the GBU-57 MOP in combat. “Our bombers struck and returned undetected,” he said. “This was a global demonstration of American stealth, strategy, and strength.”

Trump Applauds Operation, Warns of Escalation

President Donald Trump formally announced the airstrikes on Saturday evening and followed up with a televised address, flanked by Hegseth, Vice President J.D. Vance, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. He praised the military’s efforts, stating the targets were “completely and totally obliterated.”

Trump reiterated his commitment to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and warned of a broader campaign should Tehran refuse to engage in meaningful diplomacy.

“If Iran chooses not to make peace, we are prepared to dismantle remaining targets with speed and precision,” the president declared. “No military force on earth could have carried out what happened tonight. Not even close.”

As international observers assess the implications of the strike, questions loom over whether Iran will respond militarily or seek diplomatic offramps. Meanwhile, Washington stands firm, signaling that this mission was only the beginning if its demands remain unmet.

Trump Hails Strike on Iran Nuclear Sites, Warns of Future Military Action

June 21, 2025June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA, World 0

In a nationally televised address on Saturday evening, President Donald Trump described the recent U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities as a “remarkable military achievement” and cautioned that additional operations could follow unless Tehran agrees to a peace deal on Washington’s terms.

Speaking from the Cross Hall of the White House, Trump stated that the objective of the operation was to dismantle Iran’s ability to enrich uranium and eliminate what he called the “nuclear threat from the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism.” Flanked by Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the president declared the mission an overwhelming success.

“Tonight, I can inform the world that Iran’s major nuclear sites have been effectively neutralized,” Trump said, referring to strikes on the Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan facilities. According to Trump, those locations were “completely and totally obliterated” in coordinated U.S. attacks.

The announcement came just hours after Trump revealed the offensive via his Truth Social account. The airstrikes, carried out amid rising tensions in the region, mark a significant escalation in U.S. involvement in the conflict between Iran and Israel that has intensified over the past two weeks.

In a follow-up social media post, Trump issued a stern warning to Iran, stating that any form of retaliation would be met with overwhelming force. “This must end,” he wrote. “Either there is peace, or Iran will face consequences far more devastating than anything seen in recent days. Tonight’s strike targeted the hardest site. Others remain in our sights if peace talks fail.”

Trump offered no clear definition of what a “satisfactory” peace agreement with Iran would entail. He reiterated his longstanding position that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons or continue uranium enrichment under any circumstances.

Citing reports from Fox News and The New York Times, officials confirmed that six precision “bunker-buster” bombs were deployed against the Fordow site, which lies deep underground in a fortified mountain facility. Defense Secretary Hegseth and Pentagon officials are expected to provide further details on the strikes at a briefing scheduled for Sunday morning.

During his remarks, Trump noted he had spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following the operation, emphasizing close coordination between the two allies. “We acted in unison,” he said. The White House also released images from the Situation Room showing top national security officials, including CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, monitoring the mission alongside the president.

The strike follows Trump’s earlier suggestion that the U.S. would give Iran two weeks to pursue diplomatic channels before initiating military action. Despite that statement, the abrupt nature of the operation has stirred debate in Washington over executive war powers.

While Republican leaders largely backed the president’s decision, some lawmakers questioned its legality, citing the lack of congressional authorization. “This is unconstitutional,” posted Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) on X. Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) echoed the concern, saying, “Even if the decision proves strategically sound, its constitutional basis is highly questionable.”

The White House has not yet responded to inquiries regarding these constitutional concerns.

As global leaders and defense analysts continue to assess the ramifications of this strike, the world watches to see whether Iran will escalate the conflict or move toward a negotiated resolution.

GOP Tax Plan Could Deepen Struggles for Low-Income Families, Warns CBO

June 21, 2025June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

Low-income families and children would be among the most affected groups under the Republicans’ proposed One Big Beautiful Bill Act, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). While the bill promises substantial benefits for affluent Americans, it would reduce support for some of the nation’s most vulnerable populations.

To fund the extension of the 2017 Trump-era tax cuts, Republicans in both chambers of Congress aim to scale back several essential safety net programs, including healthcare, food aid, and financial assistance. These changes would impact millions of American children.

Currently, more than 37 million children receive healthcare through Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). CHIP covers pregnant women and children slightly above the Medicaid poverty line. Combined, these programs provide coverage to nearly half of all children in the United States, ensuring vital prenatal care, facilitating over 40% of U.S. births and nearly half of rural births, and supporting millions of children through adolescence.

Under the Republican plan, states would be allowed to impose waiting periods before families can enroll in CHIP and penalize them for missing premium payments by locking them out of the program. Additionally, the bill proposes a nationwide Medicaid work requirement for the first time. Though the House version claims to exempt parents, Allison Orris of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) notes, “What we’ve seen from past experience with work requirements is that exemptions are not always effective.”

Senate Republicans take it a step further, requiring even part-time work from parents of children over 14. Kevin Corinth of the conservative American Enterprise Institute (AEI) argues that this may benefit families: “If [parents’] earnings go up because they’re complying, that actually could be good for the kids. Because there is good research showing that, when parents work and we get more earnings coming into the household, that can improve current and future outcomes [for children].”

However, critics believe these requirements create more red tape. “When there’s more red tape, we know that it’s harder for families,” explains Joan Alker, who leads the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University. “To see these kinds of cuts is very, very scary.”

Despite these criticisms, House Speaker Mike Johnson’s office defended the proposals, stating, “Republicans are protecting and strengthening Medicaid for American citizens who need and deserve it by rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse.” On NBC’s Meet the Press, Johnson also declared, “There are no Medicaid cuts in the Big, Beautiful Bill. We’re not cutting Medicaid.”

However, the CBO estimates that the House bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by approximately $800 billion over the next decade. The Commonwealth Fund suggests that one in five children could lose Medicaid coverage under this plan. Alker warns that the proposed changes would push states into making tough choices between reducing services or raising taxes. “Governors are gonna have to do the dirty work,” she says, adding that the Senate’s version would likely impose even greater burdens on states.

CBO research indicates that childhood Medicaid coverage correlates with increased adult earnings and higher tax contributions, potentially offsetting the cost of the program. “Increasing children’s enrollment in Medicaid would reduce the future federal deficit by between roughly $800 and $3,400 per child per year of enrollment,” the CBO found.

Beyond healthcare, Republicans are targeting food assistance. The House bill proposes substantial changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or food stamps, which currently helps over 15 million U.S. children afford groceries. Katie Bergh, a senior policy analyst at CBPP, said the House proposal represents “the deepest cut to food assistance in history.”

The bill would expand existing work requirements under SNAP. “Research has repeatedly shown that this doesn’t increase people’s employment. It doesn’t increase their earnings. It just cuts people off of SNAP and leaves them hungry,” Bergh argues.

In total, the House plan would cut over $290 billion from SNAP over the next 10 years. Bergh estimates this would “eliminate or substantially reduce” food support for more than 2 million children. The plan would also require states to fund between 5% and 25% of SNAP costs, a shift Bergh and others worry could prompt some states to reduce benefits, limit eligibility, or exit the program entirely. CBO notes that as a result, children could also lose access to free school meals, which are automatically tied to SNAP enrollment.

Overall, CBO estimates the poorest households would lose about $1,600 annually under the GOP proposal—mainly due to reductions in programs like Medicaid and SNAP. In contrast, the wealthiest Americans would gain an average of $12,000 per year. Disputing the analysis, House Republicans insist that “the biggest beneficiaries of this [bill] will be low- and middle-income Americans,” according to Speaker Johnson.

The Senate’s plan closely aligns with the House’s in imposing work requirements and shifting costs to states.

On the tax side, Senate Republicans propose modest improvements to tax benefits for families, including the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit. Sarah Rittling, executive director of First Five Years Fund, welcomed this move, saying, “Expanding child care tax credits in the Senate bill is a step in the right direction toward making care more affordable and accessible for families nationwide.”

However, proposed changes to the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and Child Tax Credit (CTC) have raised concerns among researchers. The EITC, a critical anti-poverty measure for low-income working families, would require parents to undergo a burdensome precertification process before claiming the credit. Kevin Corinth of AEI notes that this added requirement could create barriers for families and place further strain on the IRS, which has already suffered staffing reductions.

The current Child Tax Credit allows families to deduct up to $2,000 per child from their tax bill. The House bill would raise this to $2,500 but maintains income requirements that limit access for low-income households. Megan Curran, policy director at Columbia University’s Center on Poverty and Social Policy, points out that the proposal would make it even harder for families to qualify. The House plan would disqualify an estimated 4.5 million children by requiring both parents to have Social Security numbers. The Senate version, by contrast, would require only one parent to have a Social Security number, though it’s unclear how many children that would still exclude.

The bill would also preserve the existing rule that blocks the lowest-income families from receiving the full credit. “Under current policy, a two-adult, two-child family needs at least $36,000 [in income] in order to get the full [credit],” Curran explains. “That’s 1 in 4 kids nationwide who are left out of the full credit.” If the credit is raised, that same family would need $48,000 in income to qualify. “As a result, under the House Reconciliation Bill, 1 out of every 3 children would be left out of the full credit nationwide,” Curran adds.

While many countries provide child benefits to all families, Curran emphasizes that “we exclude the families with lower and moderate incomes. And those are children who arguably could really benefit from this type of investment the most.”

In 2021, Congress briefly expanded the CTC to cover the lowest-income families, cutting child poverty nearly in half during its six-month duration. Curran argues such investments pay for themselves. “Every dollar that you spend on the child tax credit in an expanded form that reaches all kids would return at least $10 a year,” she says. The return comes in the form of better health, improved academic outcomes, higher lifetime earnings, and increased tax contributions.

Tehran Signals Willingness for Diplomacy Only After Israeli Aggression Ends

June 21, 2025June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced on Friday that Tehran would consider returning to diplomatic negotiations only after Israeli attacks on the country cease and Israel is held responsible for its actions. This declaration came after discussions in Geneva with European officials regarding Iran’s nuclear program.

“Iran is ready to consider diplomacy once again and once the aggression is stopped and the aggressor is held accountable for the crimes committed… We support the continuation of discussion with Britain, France, Germany and the European Union and express our readiness to meet again in the near future,” Araghchi told journalists after the talks, which were held at a hotel in Geneva.

The Geneva meeting included representatives from the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the European Union, who collectively encouraged Iran to stay engaged in diplomatic efforts to resolve the nuclear impasse, especially in light of ongoing Israeli military actions. These European powers underscored the importance of involving the United States in any viable long-term solution.

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, speaking on behalf of the European group, noted that Iran had expressed openness to continuing the dialogue. “The good result today is that we leave the room with the impression that the Iranian side is ready to further discuss all the important questions,” he said. Emphasizing the need for broader international involvement, he added, “It is of great importance that the United States takes part in these negotiations and the solution.”

Although no major breakthrough was reached during the Geneva meeting, the joint statement delivered by the top diplomats from the four entities suggested cautious optimism. The statement, read in their respective native languages, emphasized the importance of sustaining discussions but did not indicate any substantial progress had been made during the session.

While diplomatic discussions unfolded in Geneva, the conflict on the ground continued to escalate. The Israeli military confirmed it had launched a new series of airstrikes targeting Iranian missile launchers in the southwestern region of Iran. This marked a continuation of Israel’s offensive campaign, which it claims is intended to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

The cycle of violence intensified further when Iranian forces retaliated by launching another wave of missile attacks. According to local officials, at least 19 individuals were wounded in the Israeli port city of Haifa during the missile strike on Friday afternoon. The situation on the ground reflects a rapidly deteriorating security environment, which poses risks not just to Israel and Iran but to the broader Middle East region.

British Foreign Secretary David Lammy acknowledged the severity of the situation and urged all parties to avoid escalation. “This is a perilous moment, and it is hugely important that we don’t see regional escalation of this conflict,” he said, reinforcing the call for restraint.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot also voiced concern, cautioning that a military solution would not resolve the crisis. “There can be no definitive solution through military means to the Iran nuclear problem. Military operations can delay it but they cannot eliminate it,” he said. Barrot also responded to provocative statements made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who refused to rule out the possibility of targeting Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In response, Barrot stated, “It is illusory and dangerous to want to impose a regime change from the outside. It is up to the people to decide their own destiny.”

The European Union’s foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, echoed these concerns and stressed the importance of ongoing dialogue. “Today the regional escalation benefits no-one. We must keep the discussions open,” she said, reaffirming the EU’s commitment to maintaining communication channels.

Earlier in the day, Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency reported that Iran remained committed to dialogue and had not abandoned the negotiation process. According to the report, the Iranian delegation “emphasised that Iran has not left the negotiating table,” signaling Tehran’s intention to remain involved in diplomatic initiatives, albeit conditionally.

The recent series of events marks the latest chapter in a long-standing and complex conflict between Iran and Israel. The Israeli government initiated its military operation one week ago, declaring its objective was to stop Iran from acquiring an atomic bomb. Since then, tensions have escalated rapidly, drawing in international concern and diplomatic interventions.

The Geneva talks were aimed at averting a wider conflict and restoring some semblance of diplomatic momentum to the nuclear discussions. However, the current conditions—defined by military escalation, inflammatory rhetoric, and widespread uncertainty—pose significant challenges to achieving a sustainable resolution. As European diplomats attempt to mediate between the involved parties, the overarching message remains consistent: diplomacy is essential, but its success depends on the cessation of hostilities and the willingness of all sides, including the United States and Israel, to return to the table.

Though the immediate future of negotiations remains unclear, the Geneva discussions signal a glimmer of hope that diplomacy may yet offer a path forward—provided that military aggression subsides and accountability is pursued.

Massive Credential Leak Exposes Billions of Login Details, Say Cybersecurity Experts

June 21, 2025June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterMedia 0

A recent investigation by cybersecurity researchers at Cybernews has revealed that billions of login credentials have been compromised and compiled into online datasets, granting cybercriminals what experts describe as “unprecedented access” to users’ personal accounts used in everyday digital life.

In a newly published report this week, Cybernews detailed its discovery of 30 publicly exposed datasets, each brimming with a massive number of login credentials. In total, these datasets hold an estimated 16 billion compromised credentials. The leaked information reportedly spans a wide variety of platforms, including some of the most frequently used services like Google, Facebook, and Apple.

The magnitude of the leak is startling. Sixteen billion credentials amount to roughly twice the number of people on the planet today. This figure underscores the likelihood that many affected individuals had more than one account exposed during the breaches. However, Cybernews researchers pointed out that “there are most certainly duplicates in the data,” meaning that not all of the 16 billion entries represent unique users or accounts. Because of this, the team clarified that “it’s impossible to tell how many people or accounts were actually exposed.”

What makes this leak particularly concerning is that the compromised credentials did not originate from a single cyberattack or breach of a single organization. Rather, the report explains that the data appears to have been stolen across numerous cyber incidents that took place over an extended period. These stolen credentials were later compiled and, for a brief time, publicly available online. It was during this exposure window that Cybernews researchers stumbled upon the extensive troves of data.

One key suspect behind the widespread theft is infostealers—types of malicious software that covertly infiltrate a victim’s system to extract private and sensitive information. Cybernews noted that these infostealers are the most likely culprits in this situation. These malware variants are designed to bypass traditional security barriers and can often go unnoticed by the victim, which makes them a favored tool for cybercriminals looking to harvest login credentials and other valuable digital assets.

Despite the discovery, many questions linger about the true scope of the breach, including how many users have been impacted, which services have been most affected, and who currently holds the stolen login credentials. The answers remain unclear. But cybersecurity professionals consistently emphasize the increasing frequency and scale of such data breaches in today’s interconnected world. In response, experts are renewing calls for consumers to adopt what they refer to as strong “cyber hygiene.”

If there is concern that your account information might have been included in this latest leak, the most immediate action to take is updating your passwords. This is particularly important for those who reuse the same or similar credentials across multiple sites. Using repeated login combinations greatly increases the risk that a single compromised password could lead to multiple account takeovers.

Additionally, for individuals who struggle to remember numerous complex passwords, cybersecurity experts recommend the use of password managers. These tools can safely store and organize unique passwords for various accounts, reducing the temptation to reuse credentials. Another modern alternative is the adoption of passkeys, which provide a simpler and often more secure method of signing in to digital services.

Furthermore, experts strongly advise enabling multifactor authentication wherever possible. This extra layer of protection adds a second verification step, usually involving a code sent to your phone, an email verification, or a USB authenticator key. While this doesn’t prevent your password from being stolen, it makes it significantly more difficult for hackers to access your accounts even if they have your login credentials.

The Cybernews report underscores the urgency for users to take proactive steps to protect their online identities. As cyber threats continue to evolve, staying vigilant and adopting better security habits may be the only way for individuals to safeguard their data in a digital landscape where breaches are becoming alarmingly routine.

Judge Blocks Trump Administration from Barring International Students at Harvard

June 21, 2025June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration, temporarily halting its efforts to prevent Harvard University from admitting international students, as reported by the Associated Press. The ruling, handed down by U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs, ensures that Harvard can continue enrolling foreign students as the legal battle continues.

This decision marks another significant legal victory for Harvard in its ongoing confrontation with the federal government over multiple sanctions initiated by the White House. The university has found itself at odds with the Trump administration over various issues, culminating in legal action.

In May, Harvard filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) following the agency’s decision to revoke the university’s certification to enrol foreign students and issue documents necessary for obtaining student visas. This administrative move, if left unchallenged, would have affected approximately 7,000 international students already studying at Harvard. These students would have been compelled to transfer to other institutions or face the risk of losing their legal immigration status in the United States. Furthermore, new international students would have been blocked from enrolling altogether.

Harvard described the government’s action as illegal retaliation. The university argued that the DHS decision was a response to its refusal to adhere to several demands from the White House, including changes to campus protest policies, admissions criteria, and faculty hiring practices, among other internal policies. Shortly after Harvard initiated the lawsuit, Judge Burroughs acted to temporarily suspend the DHS directive.

Then, less than two weeks later, President Donald Trump made a separate attempt to stop international students from entering the United States to study at Harvard, this time citing a different legal rationale. Once again, Harvard contested the action in court. Judge Burroughs responded by issuing another temporary order, blocking the new attempt by the administration.

The growing feud between Harvard and the Trump administration stems from broader political tensions. The university has come under scrutiny from Trump and his allies for what they claim is a liberal bias and a lenient stance on antisemitism. The administration accused Harvard of failing to address these concerns adequately, leading to an escalating series of federal actions.

As part of its response, the Trump administration cut more than $2.6 billion in research funding previously directed to the university. In addition to withdrawing financial support, the government cancelled existing contracts with Harvard and threatened to remove the university’s tax-exempt status—an aggressive step rarely taken against academic institutions.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem intensified the conflict in April by requesting a broad array of records from Harvard that pertained to any potentially dangerous or unlawful behaviour by foreign students. Although Harvard claimed it had complied with the request, Noem reportedly found the university’s response unsatisfactory. Consequently, on May 22, she revoked Harvard’s certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), a move that triggered the legal showdown.

According to Harvard’s legal filing, the revocation of SEVP certification immediately damaged the university’s ability to attract high-calibre international students. The lawsuit argues that the decision had a chilling effect on the university’s global competitiveness and reputation. As Harvard’s complaint stated, “Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard.”

The loss of international students would have severely impacted various academic programs, particularly graduate programs, which often rely heavily on enrollment from abroad. Recognising the threat, several foreign universities extended offers of admission to Harvard students who faced uncertainty due to the U.S. government’s actions. Among them were at least two institutions based in Hong Kong, demonstrating the global academic community’s willingness to provide alternatives to the affected students.

Harvard President Alan Garber acknowledged that the university has taken steps to address antisemitism, a key concern cited by the Trump administration. However, he firmly defended Harvard’s stance against what he described as federal overreach into the university’s internal governance.

Garber expressed the university’s resolve to uphold its institutional autonomy and foundational values. “Harvard will remain committed to its core, legally-protected principles,” he said, underscoring that the institution will not be intimidated by political pressure.

The preliminary injunction issued by Judge Burroughs temporarily halts the federal government’s efforts while the lawsuit proceeds. The ruling is not a final determination but does signal the judge’s recognition of the serious legal and constitutional questions raised by the case.

The legal developments reflect a broader tension between academic freedom and government oversight, especially regarding policies affecting international students. With over 7,000 international students, Harvard represents a significant hub of global talent, and the court’s ruling preserves their ability to study in the U.S., at least for now.

Although the Trump administration has defended its measures as part of a broader national security agenda, critics argue that the actions appear politically motivated and risk undermining America’s longstanding reputation as a destination for world-class higher education.

As the legal proceedings continue, all eyes will be on the federal courts to determine whether the administration’s attempts to curtail foreign student access to American universities can be upheld or whether they violate constitutional protections afforded to educational institutions.

For now, Harvard retains its ability to welcome international students and continue its academic mission without federal interference. The outcome of the lawsuit could set a precedent for how universities across the country navigate federal regulations, particularly when they conflict with institutional values and academic independence.

Flight Chaos Grips Europe’s Busiest Airports as Over 500 Flights Affected in One Day

June 20, 2025June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterGlobal, Travel 0

More than 300 flights were cancelled and delayed across three major European international airports — London Heathrow, Amsterdam Schiphol, and Paris Charles de Gaulle — on a day marked by widespread disruption. Global airlines including Air France, American Airlines, Emirates, Singapore Airlines, Qatar Airways, United Airlines, and Oman Air were among those affected by a fresh bout of operational turbulence. The disruptions were caused by a mix of staffing shortages, delays in gate allocation, ground handling problems, and tight aircraft rotations, which created a chain reaction of delays and cancellations from morning to night. These three airports, acting as major transatlantic and intercontinental gateways, served as the starting point for disruptions that quickly spread to Asia, the Middle East, and North America.

Though no single cause such as adverse weather or strikes was identified, airport authorities pointed to “mounting internal strain” as the primary reason behind today’s widespread interruptions.

Heathrow’s Travel Plans Thrown Off Course

At London Heathrow, passengers encountered significant disruptions. The airport reported 54 delayed flights and eight cancellations, impacting both long-haul and short-haul services. Among the airlines most affected, British Airways experienced ten delayed flights. Finnair cancelled three flights and had one delayed, representing one of the highest cancellation ratios of the day at the airport.

Air India, which operates several routes connecting India through Heathrow, reported two flight cancellations and seven delays — a delay rate of 50 percent for the day. WestJet cancelled both of its scheduled flights, equating to a full 100 percent cancellation rate. Meanwhile, American Airlines faced six delayed flights, and Emirates and United Airlines each reported two delays.

The disruption wasn’t confined to large carriers. Even regional and smaller airlines such as Brussels Airlines, Aegean, Eurowings, and Etihad Airways each had at least one delayed flight. This cascading effect across different airlines signaled broader operational instability.

Amsterdam Schiphol Hit Hardest by Delays

Amsterdam Schiphol reported the most extensive impact, logging 104 delays and 20 cancellations in total. KLM, the airport’s largest carrier, was at the center of the turmoil with 43 delayed and 16 cancelled flights, significantly affecting European and transatlantic operations.

Delta Air Lines experienced seven delays and one cancellation at Schiphol, while Finnair, Cathay Pacific, and China Cargo each had cancellations. Smaller and cargo airlines like Cargolux, Amelia, Kuwait Airways, Malaysia Airlines, and Bulgaria Air were also caught in the mess.

Low-cost giant easyJet faced 11 delayed flights, further illustrating how the disruptions reverberated across the European travel network.

Air France Bears the Brunt at Paris Charles de Gaulle

At Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport, Air France experienced the most significant disruptions. With 58 delayed flights and eight cancellations, it was the single most affected airline across all three hubs.

The airport itself tallied 104 delayed flights and 13 cancellations, closely matching Amsterdam’s totals. Finnair cancelled three flights, while Air India, Cathay Pacific, and Delta Air Lines each faced a combination of delays and cancellations.

Regional airlines such as KM Malta Airlines, Kenya Airways, Air Senegal, and HOP! were also affected, with varying degrees of delay. American Airlines, United Airlines, and Emirates each logged two delays, indicating that even major international carriers weren’t immune to the operational snags.

Total Disruptions Cross 500 Flights in a Day

The cumulative impact at Heathrow, Schiphol, and Charles de Gaulle added up to 283 flight cancellations and 262 delays, totaling 545 disrupted flights in just one day. Though no single trigger was officially cited, representatives from various airports described the cause as “operational challenges” — a broad term encompassing issues like air traffic control limitations, staffing shortages, rotation problems, and logistical slowdowns on the ground.

While not as disruptive as severe weather or airspace closures, these operational setbacks led to widespread chaos, especially for transatlantic routes. Flights connecting Europe and the U.S. were among the most impacted, with disruptions on both sides of the Atlantic.

Snapshot of the Day’s Turmoil

London Heathrow (LHR) reported 8 cancellations and 54 delays.

Notable disruptions included:

Air India: 2 cancelled, 7 delayed
British Airways: 1 cancelled, 10 delayed
Finnair: 3 cancelled, 1 delayed
WestJet: 2 cancelled, no delays
American Airlines: 6 delayed
Emirates and United Airlines: 2 delayed each
Other airlines such as Air France, Delta, Etihad, Eurowings, Gulf Air, and Qatar Airways also reported single-digit delays.

Amsterdam Schiphol (AMS) saw 20 cancellations and 104 delays.

Heaviest impacted carriers:

KLM: 16 cancelled, 43 delayed
Delta Air Lines: 1 cancelled, 7 delayed
easyJet: 11 delayed
Additional delays were reported by carriers including German Airways, Transavia, Vueling, China Cargo, Kuwait Airways, and Air India.

Paris Charles de Gaulle (CDG) had 13 cancellations and 104 delays.

Air France led with:

8 cancellations and 58 delays

Other disruptions included:

Finnair: 3 cancellations
Air India and Cathay Pacific: 1 cancellation each
American, Emirates, Delta, United, and Qatar Airways each logged multiple delays
Regional players like Air Senegal, HOP!, and KM Malta Airlines were also impacted.

Far-Reaching Global Effects

The chaos was not limited to Europe. Given that all three airports serve as crucial transit points for flights to Asia, North America, and the Middle East, the disruptions had far-reaching implications. Airlines such as Singapore Airlines, Qatar Airways, Oman Air, and Saudia were also caught in the ripple effect.

Even a single delayed flight on these long-haul routes can create a chain of disruptions across an entire airline network. “Passengers are being advised to check their flight status directly with their airline and allow extra time for travel,” said an airport spokesperson. The interconnected nature of global aviation means that a breakdown in one hub can affect flights as far away as Dallas, Delhi, or Dubai.

As airlines and airport authorities worked throughout the day to regain control of their operations, the situation remained fluid. Experts warned that the global air travel ecosystem is so tightly linked that even small local disruptions can escalate into large-scale delays. One airline official summed it up by saying, “The sheer scale of global airline interdependence means even a localized hiccup in one of Europe’s major airports can cause delays and missed connections as far afield as Delhi, Dubai, or Dallas.”

In conclusion, today’s events highlighted the fragility of international flight networks. Despite no single catastrophic trigger, the interplay of multiple operational challenges across Europe’s busiest hubs caused widespread disruption. The episode underscores the need for better contingency planning and enhanced ground and staff readiness as the global air travel industry continues to recover and expand.

India Marks Historic Global Yoga Milestone in Guatemala with Over 10,000 Participants

June 20, 2025June 21, 2025 Staff ReporterCulture, Diplomacy 0

In a landmark celebration of the International Day of Yoga, the Indian Embassy in Guatemala, representing the Indian Council of Cultural Relations (ICCR), hosted the largest yoga gathering ever seen in Central America—and possibly outside India—on June 13, 2025. Held in San Pedro Carchá, Cobán, this monumental event attracted more than 10,000 yoga enthusiasts, marking a significant milestone in the promotion of yoga on the global stage. The event was jointly organized with the Municipality of San Pedro Carchá, the Association of Don Bosco Center, and supported by Alta Verapaz Governor Ms. Dilia Margarita Co Coy.

To set the stage for this mega celebration, the Embassy had already hosted two large prelude yoga events on June 11. The first was held in Izabal with around 550 participants, and the second in Chalal with a turnout of 1,500 people. These lead-up events highlighted the growing popularity of yoga across Guatemala’s interior regions.

The June 13 event saw full-fledged collaboration from several government bodies and private organizations. The Ministry of Education, Ministry of Defense, the host municipality, Don Bosco Center, Talita Kumu, and a number of Indian companies such as HCL Tech, TCS, Grupo Uma, Caplin Point, 24X7 a.i., Lukham Pharma, Krishper Healthcare, Strikar Pharma, Lakshmi Capital, Pradilsha, Khushi Enterprises, and Sierra Textiles contributed significantly. Their involvement ranged from participant mobilization and logistical support to offering promotional and wellness materials, making the event seamless and inclusive.

Youth participation was a focal point of the event. A staggering number of over 10,000 students from educational institutions in the region formed the heart of the audience. This overwhelming turnout was a testimony to how yoga is resonating deeply with Guatemala’s younger generation.

This grand event wasn’t a standalone success but the culmination of years of sustained efforts by the Indian Embassy. Starting in 2022 with 2,500 participants in Mariscal Zavala, participation grew steadily to 3,500 in 2023 and then 5,000 in 2024. With the number surpassing 10,000 this year, Guatemala has emerged as a leading country in promoting yoga with extraordinary energy and commitment. These annual celebrations have also been instrumental in bringing yoga to remote areas through free workshops, community programs, and school-based activities.

The event commenced on a solemn note with a one-minute silence to mourn the tragic loss of 274 lives in the plane crash that occurred in Ahmedabad, India, on June 12, 2025. Local Guatemalan dignitaries joined in paying their respects and expressing solidarity with India.

Following the tribute, a moving performance of the national anthems of Guatemala, India, and San Pedro Carchá was carried out by the Don Bosco Center’s Music Band Symphony Orchestra, representing the Music School-Art and Culture section.

Mayor Erwin Alfonso Catún Maquín of San Pedro Carchá formally opened the event, extending a warm welcome to all attendees. Remarks were also delivered by Governor Dilia Margarita Co Coy, representatives of the Don Bosco Association, and Indian Ambassador to Guatemala, Dr. Manoj Kumar Mohapatra. The Ambassador emphasized yoga’s universal relevance, calling it “a powerful tool for peace and wellbeing.” He also presented three busts of Mahatma Gandhi to the Don Bosco institutions to symbolize India’s enduring values of peace and nonviolence.

Key contributors to the event received special honors during the ceremony. Commemorative plaques were handed out to sponsors, municipal partners, and Indian business representatives in recognition of their support. In his heartfelt address, Ambassador Mohapatra said, “I thank the ICCR and all our stakeholders for their pivotal role in making this the largest yoga gathering outside India.” He specially acknowledged the efforts of the San Pedro Carchá Municipality, headed by Mayor Maquín, and the Association of Don Bosco for their dynamic youth outreach.

He also credited the Ministry of Defense for their crucial role in crowd management and safety. Local vendors and partners who provided t-shirts, nutritious food, and transportation were praised for fostering an inclusive and celebratory environment. Governor Dilia Margarita Co Coy, Mayor Maquín, and Father Antonio de Groot of Don Bosco were honored for their invaluable contributions.

A notable moment of appreciation came from Prof. Indrajit S. Saluja, Publisher and Editor of The Indian Panorama, a digital weekly published from New York. He presented Ambassador Mohapatra with a replica of the Golden Temple, describing it as “a symbol of honor and recognition from the global Sikh community.”

Mayor Maquín expressed his gratitude to the Embassy and ICCR, stating, “We are proud to have been part of this historic event and pledge to continue promoting yoga as part of our community’s everyday life.” Indian business sponsors echoed these sentiments, proud to be part of a movement that enhances wellness and fosters deeper India-Guatemala ties. Contributions like yoga mats, refreshments, t-shirts, and water bottles ensured the event was accessible and welcoming to all.

The yoga session itself, led by Embassy Yoga teacher Ms. Ruth Morales, followed the Common Yoga Protocol under the theme “Yoga for One Earth, One Health.” Participants of all ages, from students and teachers to military officers and civilians, participated enthusiastically. Under Morales’ guidance, they practiced asanas, pranayama, and meditation focused on physical fitness, mental clarity, and ecological harmony.

The visual of over 10,000 people practicing yoga in unison under the morning sun at the Juan Ramón Ponce Guay Stadium was nothing short of breathtaking. As the session ended, Mayor Maquín encouraged attendees to join him in a dance, which they did with infectious enthusiasm. Youth participation remained high-spirited throughout, even during the impromptu dance session.

Earlier that morning, folk dancers performed an electrifying routine inside the stadium, which was met with loud applause and joy from the attendees. As participants headed home, they were given refreshment bags, adding a thoughtful touch to the event.

Later, Mayor Maquín hosted a lunch in honor of the Indian Embassy staff and their guests. Among them were senior journalist and novelist Baldev Singh Grewal and acclaimed photographer Jay Mandal, both from New York, who were present to witness and document the celebration.

Following the success of this historic gathering, the Indian Embassy is now preparing to host additional International Day of Yoga events in San Salvador and Tegucigalpa on June 21, 2025. These upcoming celebrations, supported by local authorities and sponsors, aim to further amplify India’s message of health, harmony, and peace through yoga.

India’s growing impact in Guatemala has not only strengthened bilateral ties but also demonstrated the power of cultural diplomacy. Through yoga, India has united thousands across borders in a shared pursuit of well-being and inner peace.

H-1B Techie’s Green Card Dreams Derailed by Suspected Fake Job Applicants

June 19, 2025June 23, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

An H-1B visa holder working in the United States was recently hit with an unexpected and troubling setback from his employer—one that had nothing to do with his performance or qualifications, but rather with a suspicious surge of job applications. This tech professional, who shared his story online, is currently in his second year of employment as an Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Engineer at a financial technology firm. His journey toward permanent residency in the U.S. was progressing until it was suddenly halted under questionable circumstances.

The company had initially planned to sponsor his green card under the “Data Scientist II” role—the same designation under which he was hired back in 2022. Everything seemed to be on track until earlier this month when the company’s immigration team suddenly decided to pause the PERM labor market process. The reason? They had received over 400 applications for the job opening posted as part of the labor certification requirement. Surprisingly, not a single interview was conducted before this abrupt decision was made.

According to the employee, the company feared that the sheer volume of applications could potentially trigger an audit by the U.S. Department of Labor. Such audits are often lengthy and complex, and companies typically prefer to avoid them due to the bureaucratic complications they entail. The techie also acknowledged a flaw in the process, admitting that the job description provided for the PERM process was vague and didn’t accurately represent the kind of work he actually performs.

In the time since the original PERM application process began, the H-1B worker has even received a promotion. He now holds the position of AI/ML Engineer III. With this new role, his employer has opted to restart the green card process from scratch, which includes preparing a new job posting and going through the labor market testing phase again.

But what’s more alarming about this entire episode is what it reveals about an emerging and disturbing trend. The unusually high number of applications received for the Data Scientist II role may not be entirely genuine. In fact, another user on social media highlighted the presence of an account on the platform X (formerly Twitter) that has been actively urging individuals to flood PERM job postings with applications. The account even boasted about the outcome of the exact scenario that this tech worker experienced, sharing celebratory posts whenever companies were forced to pull back from the green card sponsorship process due to overwhelming applicant numbers.

There appears to be a coordinated effort among some individuals online to disrupt the green card processes of H-1B visa holders by artificially inflating the number of applicants for labor certification jobs. Some of these users are openly admitting that they are applying for positions under the PERM process for which they are not remotely qualified. Their objective is not to secure the job, but to sabotage the path to permanent residency for foreign workers.

“This is weaponizing a system that is already skewed against immigrants,” one observer noted. U.S. citizens who participate in these tactics face no legal repercussions. They are allowed to apply for any job, even if they do not meet the qualifications or do not intend to accept the position if offered. As a result, the real cost is borne by the H-1B visa holders, who are already navigating a complex and uncertain immigration landscape.

For many foreign workers, the PERM process is an essential step toward obtaining a green card, which in turn provides a sense of security and stability in the U.S. However, the system requires the sponsoring employer to demonstrate that there are no qualified U.S. workers willing and available to take the job. This is typically done by advertising the job and allowing a window of time for applicants to respond. If qualified U.S. workers do apply, or if the volume of responses is unusually high, the process may be paused or even abandoned entirely, as companies fear scrutiny or delays from federal audits.

In this particular case, the flood of over 400 job applications—none of which resulted in interviews—has raised serious questions about the legitimacy of those applications. The affected H-1B techie, who had followed all the legal and professional steps to advance his career and permanent residency in the U.S., finds himself back at square one.

The employer’s decision to pause the PERM process and start anew might appear as a procedural reset, but it represents a significant emotional and professional setback for the worker. Not only does it delay his green card timeline, but it also places his future in the U.S. in jeopardy, especially given the limited duration of H-1B visas and the uncertainty involved in annual renewals.

This growing trend of sabotaging PERM listings could have far-reaching implications for the broader immigrant community in the U.S. It exposes a vulnerability in the labor certification system—one that can be exploited without consequence to deliberately derail the aspirations of skilled foreign workers.

The techie’s story highlights how a system designed to balance opportunities for domestic workers and foreign talent can be manipulated to serve exclusionary agendas. While immigration processes have always been subject to regulatory checks, this new wave of deliberate disruption is unprecedented in its scale and intent.

As the techie’s experience circulates online, it has sparked broader conversations about the fairness and resilience of the current immigration system. Supporters of H-1B workers argue that reform is urgently needed—not only to streamline the green card process but also to safeguard it from bad-faith actors who misuse the system for political or personal motives.

In the meantime, individuals like the AI/ML engineer at the center of this story are left to pick up the pieces and start over. Despite his qualifications, promotion, and proven contributions to his employer, he now faces yet another uphill battle to secure his place in a country he has already begun to call home.

There is little legal recourse for H-1B workers in such scenarios. The immigration system allows domestic applicants to flood listings without accountability, while foreign workers face strict scrutiny at every stage. In essence, those looking to derail green card sponsorships can do so freely, but the consequences fall squarely on the shoulders of the immigrants affected.

As one observer succinctly put it, “There is no legal trouble for anyone who is applying for these jobs. But for an H-1B techie chasing a secure future in the US, he pays a heavy price.”

UAE Unveils Groundbreaking High-Speed Rail Linking Abu Dhabi and Dubai

June 19, 2025June 21, 2025 Staff ReporterEnvironment, Travel 0

High-speed train systems are becoming a global phenomenon, with rapid developments underway across continents—from Europe to North Africa and East Asia. Now, the Middle East is entering the scene with an ambitious new high-speed rail service that will link two of its most prominent cities: Abu Dhabi and Dubai.

The announcement came during a ceremonial event held at the Al Faya Depot in Abu Dhabi. At the heart of this development is Etihad Rail, the national railway company, which is spearheading the creation of a high-speed train connecting the Emirati capital with Dubai.

Already recognized as one of the most advanced cities in the world in terms of public transportation, Abu Dhabi is set to enhance its connectivity even further. This new train service is expected to significantly ease the commute between the two cities, creating a smoother experience for both residents and tourists.

One of the most striking aspects of this upcoming service is its speed. The train is designed to travel at a maximum speed of 350 kilometers per hour. With this, the journey time between Abu Dhabi and Dubai will be cut down to a mere 30 minutes. This dramatic reduction in travel time is expected to make daily life more efficient and convenient for many, especially for those who frequently travel between the two cities for work or leisure.

The rail project is not just about speed and convenience; it also plays a critical role in the United Arab Emirates’ broader sustainability goals. It is closely aligned with the UAE’s Net Zero 2050 strategy, a national plan aimed at achieving carbon neutrality by mid-century. A statement from the official press release underlined the environmental benefits, explaining that the new railway is expected to contribute significantly to a greener and more sustainable mode of transportation.

Additionally, the development of the high-speed service is being viewed as a major step forward for the UAE’s global standing in the realm of sustainable infrastructure. The release expressed optimism that the project would enhance the nation’s international competitiveness. In the words of the official statement, the hope is that this development will “bolster the UAE’s competitiveness internationally when it comes to sustainable transport.”

Economically, the implications of this infrastructure advancement are equally compelling. Analysts and government officials are forecasting significant financial benefits. One projection suggests that the railway will contribute a remarkable AED145 billion to the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over the next 50 years. That’s an eye-opening one hundred and forty-five billion dirhams in added economic value.

But this high-speed line is just one part of a broader plan to expand and modernize the UAE’s public transport infrastructure. During the same ceremony, officials also unveiled the country’s first fleet of passenger trains. These trains are set to operate at speeds of up to 200 kilometers per hour, catering to longer distances within the country and possibly the broader Gulf region.

As if that weren’t enough, the event also marked the introduction of the UAE’s first four passenger rail stations. These new stations will be located in Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah, and Fujairah. Importantly, they’ve been designed to seamlessly integrate with existing metro and bus networks. This integrated approach reflects a growing emphasis on making public transport more efficient, connected, and accessible to the population at large.

The ceremony at Al Faya Depot thus served as more than just an announcement of a new train. It showcased a holistic vision for the future of mobility in the UAE. The inclusion of stations in different emirates also points to a long-term goal of fostering national unity and regional development, with rail travel acting as a catalyst for both.

With work now moving forward, residents and stakeholders alike are looking to the future with anticipation. Once operational, the high-speed train is expected to transform the way people travel between Abu Dhabi and Dubai. For daily commuters, it means spending less time on the road and more time at work or home. For tourists, it offers a faster, more scenic, and eco-friendly way to explore the region.

All of this is in line with the UAE’s broader ambitions to position itself as a global leader in innovation, sustainability, and infrastructure development. The unveiling of these projects reflects a national commitment to long-term progress that is both economically and environmentally responsible.

In summary, the UAE’s new high-speed rail link between Abu Dhabi and Dubai is much more than just a transportation upgrade. It’s a symbol of the country’s forward-thinking vision, one that encompasses environmental sustainability, economic growth, and improved quality of life for its citizens and visitors alike. With trains expected to zip along at 350 kilometers per hour and reach their destination in just 30 minutes, the project promises to be a game-changer for the region.

As the official press release noted, the initiative will “vastly improve connectivity between Abu Dhabi and Dubai” while also reinforcing the UAE’s commitment to a more sustainable future. Furthermore, projections indicate that the project will “improve the country’s GDP by a staggering AED145 billion over the next five decades.”

During the event, attendees were also introduced to “the UAE’s first passenger train fleet,” capable of speeds of up to 200 kilometers per hour. Additionally, the presentation of “the country’s first four passenger rail stations in Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah and Fujairah” highlighted how these stations have been “designed to integrate with metro and bus services.”

By combining rapid transit with environmentally conscious goals and substantial economic foresight, the UAE is laying down the tracks—both literal and figurative—for a more connected and sustainable future.

India Hopes for Early Trade Deal with U.S. Before Tariffs Kick In: Piyush Goyal

June 19, 2025June 21, 2025 Staff ReporterEconomy, Diplomacy 0

As the deadline approaches for the U.S. to implement “reciprocal tariffs” on Indian goods beginning July 9, Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has voiced cautious optimism that both countries may sign an initial segment of a broader trade agreement before that date. Although hopeful, Goyal refrained from confirming whether a preliminary deal would indeed be finalized in time.

“We are in continuous dialogue. I have always been an optimist,” Goyal remarked during an interview with The Hindu on the sidelines of the India Global Forum 2025 conference held in London.

Expressing confidence in the partnership between the two countries, he added, “I’m very confident that, given that the U.S. and India are very friendly countries, trusted partners, both wanting to have resilient, reliable, trusted supply chains, both vibrant democracies, we will be able to come up with a win-win for the businesses of both countries.” Without a deal, Indian exports to the U.S. could face a steep 26% tariff starting in early July.

While there is urgency surrounding the negotiations, Goyal chose not to disclose whether the initial portion of the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) under discussion would include sensitive sectors such as dairy and agriculture. When questioned on this, he stated, “I think negotiations are best left to the negotiators and the negotiating table. We will, of course, inform the media at the right time.”

He was similarly tight-lipped regarding the impact of the expiration of the U.S. Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) on the overall agreement. The TPA is a legislative mechanism allowing the U.S. President to expedite trade deals, especially those involving tariffs lower than the standard Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) rates offered under the World Trade Organization (WTO) guidelines.

Earlier in the day, Goyal shared a platform with his British counterpart, Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, during a moderated session. Their appearance followed the recent conclusion of a free trade agreement between India and the United Kingdom on May 6. Goyal attributed the success of that deal to mutual respect for each other’s concerns and the willingness to set aside issues that were not immediately negotiable.

Turning attention to India’s ongoing trade discussions with the European Union, Goyal said that the aim was to wrap up a comprehensive trade pact by the end of the current calendar year. When asked whether the agreement would be finalized as a full-scale deal or as an interim arrangement, he responded by invoking a metaphor. “There’s that famous English phrase…since we are in Great Britain…‘the air is pregnant with possibilities,’” he said, emphasizing that the exact nature and form of the final deal remained undetermined at this stage.

On the question of whether the return of Donald Trump and his “America First” policy to the U.S. presidency had any bearing on India’s negotiations with the European Union, Goyal dismissed such notions, stating that bilateral talks are generally insulated from third-party influences. His comments came a week after European Union Foreign Minister Kaja Kallas called the EU a “reliable, predictable and credible partner for India” during a joint press briefing with India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar. Since Trump’s return to power, various countries have been reevaluating their diplomatic and trade ties with Washington.

Goyal, however, maintained that bilateral negotiations operate independently of geopolitical shifts. “I don’t think there’s any impact of any other situation on a negotiation between two countries, because these negotiations are not a short-term arrangement. These are like long-term marriages you are negotiating after crystal-gazing … 25 years, 50 years, into the future,” he explained.

Commenting on the future of multilateral trade, Goyal reiterated India’s commitment to the World Trade Organization (WTO), despite growing skepticism in the global community about the body’s efficacy. He emphasized that the WTO still plays a significant role in maintaining global trade norms and frameworks, even as the U.S. steps back from multilateralism under the Trump administration.

“[India] believes we have to strengthen the WTO over the next few years through dialogue and discussions and will continue to play an increasingly important role to promote multilateralism,” Goyal stated. He underscored India’s belief in the importance of global cooperation through established institutions.

Meanwhile, India has also informed the WTO of its right to consider retaliatory tariffs in response to the U.S.’s decision to increase import duties on steel and aluminum. This move serves as a signal of India’s readiness to respond firmly when its trade interests are affected.

Addressing a specific issue involving Tata Steel, Goyal said that the Indian government had not raised the matter directly with British authorities. Tata Steel owns the Port Talbot steel plant in South Wales, which has faced operational adjustments, including sourcing raw materials from India and Europe, after its blast furnace was shut down last year. The plant is scheduled to transition to an electric arc furnace by 2027.

These adjustments may complicate matters if the U.S. insists on tighter rules regarding input materials before granting tariff reductions as part of any UK-U.S. agreement. According to a report by The Guardian, the Trump administration has warned that it may continue imposing a 25% tariff on British steel unless the UK can assure that Tata Steel’s inputs comply with American standards.

When asked whether India had intervened or planned to intervene on behalf of Tata Steel in negotiations with the U.K. or the U.S., Goyal replied bluntly, “That, the U.K., has to negotiate with the U.S.”

In summary, Goyal’s remarks convey a cautiously hopeful tone regarding an initial trade pact between India and the U.S. before the July 9 tariff deadline. While refraining from revealing specifics, his comments stress India’s readiness to pursue long-term, mutually beneficial agreements rooted in trust and democratic values. He emphasized the importance of resilience in supply chains, bilateral respect in negotiations, and the continued relevance of multilateral platforms such as the WTO.

Trump Considers Joining Israeli Strikes on Iran as Tehran Seeks Talks

June 19, 2025June 21, 2025 Staff ReporterDiplomacy, USA 0

President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that he is deliberating whether the United States should participate in Israeli military strikes on Iran. He also claimed that Iranian officials had approached the U.S. seeking negotiations to resolve the intensifying conflict.

Trump made these remarks while observing the installation of a new flagpole at the White House. Indicating growing impatience, he emphasized that his tolerance for Tehran’s actions had already worn thin and reiterated his demand for Iran’s complete and unconditional capitulation. “My patience had already run out,” he declared, adding once again his call for the Islamic republic’s “unconditional surrender.”

Addressing reporters from the South Lawn, Trump responded ambiguously when asked if he had made a final decision on launching American airstrikes. “I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I’m going to do,” he said, maintaining his characteristically unpredictable stance.

The escalating situation follows Israeli military actions targeting Iran, including reports that one of Israel’s drones was downed over Iranian territory. Despite the rising tensions, Trump pointed to Iran’s growing difficulties as a sign that the country was feeling pressure. “I can tell you this, that Iran’s got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate,” Trump stated.

According to the president, Iranian officials had even proposed dispatching envoys to the White House to open discussions focused on Tehran’s nuclear ambitions, hoping such talks could put an end to Israel’s continuing air campaign. However, Trump appeared dismissive of the proposal’s timing. “I said it’s very late to be talking. We may meet. There’s a big difference between now and a week ago, right? Big difference,” he remarked.

Still, Trump acknowledged the gravity of Iran’s overture, describing the offer as a bold move on Tehran’s part. “They’ve suggested that they come to the White House. That’s, you know, courageous, but it’s, like, not easy for them to do,” he said. Despite calling it “very late,” Trump did not rule out the possibility of engagement. When asked directly whether it was too late for negotiations, he replied, “Nothing is too late.”

This moment marks a significant shift in Trump’s approach to Iran. During his presidency, he initially favored a diplomatic strategy aimed at curbing Tehran’s nuclear program, seeking a new deal to replace the 2015 agreement he had withdrawn from in 2018. However, with Israel’s recent air assaults now in their sixth day, Trump appears to be aligning more closely with America’s key Middle Eastern ally, signaling a willingness to consider military measures.

In parallel, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth addressed lawmakers on Capitol Hill on Wednesday, confirming that the Pentagon is supplying President Trump with potential strategies regarding Iran. However, he stopped short of revealing whether the U.S. military intended to participate directly in Israeli-led strikes.

Hegseth’s comments came during a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee, the final installment in a series of sometimes confrontational sessions with legislators. Throughout the hearings, he has faced questions on a range of topics, including his controversial use of encrypted messaging app Signal for sensitive military communications earlier this year and the Pentagon’s policies on transgender troops.

During his testimony, Hegseth emphasized that the Pentagon was taking extensive precautions to safeguard American forces stationed in West Asia. “Maximum force protection” is being implemented, he confirmed. However, he made it clear that the decision to escalate militarily rested solely with President Trump.

One potential course of action under discussion is the provision of a powerful “bunker buster” bomb to Israel. Such a weapon would enable Israeli forces to strike deeply buried Iranian nuclear sites. However, deploying this bomb would necessitate the involvement of a U.S. B-2 stealth bomber and its pilot, a step that would bring the United States directly into the conflict. Hegseth offered no details about whether such an action was imminent or likely.

Meanwhile, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei publicly rejected the notion of surrender. In a stern warning aimed at Washington, he vowed never to capitulate and cautioned that U.S. intervention could lead to severe consequences. Khamenei stated that Iran would “never surrender” and warned of “irreparable damage” should the United States choose to get involved in the confrontation.

Trump’s rhetoric and the White House’s increased openness to military involvement underscore the shifting dynamics in U.S. foreign policy toward Iran. The administration, once focused on re-negotiating nuclear terms, is now appearing more inclined toward the use of force. Yet even as he threatens military options, Trump continues to leave the door to diplomacy ajar, albeit narrowly.

By highlighting Iran’s proposed diplomatic outreach, Trump portrays the regime as desperate and vulnerable, yet at the same time, he emphasizes that any resolution would come on America’s terms. This dual strategy of pressure and ambiguity—while maintaining a veneer of openness to negotiation—reflects a characteristic Trumpian approach to foreign crises.

The possibility of U.S. engagement in Israeli military actions represents a dramatic escalation in regional tensions. It would also mark a decisive turn from previous American positions that often aimed to avoid direct conflict in the Middle East. Now, as Israel intensifies its campaign and Iran signals a potential willingness to talk, the world watches closely to see whether Trump’s next move will be diplomatic, military, or—as is often the case with him—something entirely unpredictable.

U.S. Tightens Scrutiny on Student Visa Applicants’ Online Presence Amid Broader Immigration Clampdown

June 19, 2025June 20, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, Social Media 0

U.S. diplomats have now been officially instructed to examine the social media and digital activity of all foreign nationals applying for student and other educational visas, according to a State Department cable dated Wednesday and obtained by POLITICO. The move represents a significant tightening of visa screening protocols under the Trump administration.

According to the cable, consular officers must now investigate applicants’ digital footprint for “any indications of hostility towards the citizens, culture, government, institutions or founding principles of the United States.” This directive is part of a broader effort to enhance national security and prevent entry of individuals perceived as threats. The cable further mandates that embassies identify and flag any “advocacy for, aid or support for foreign terrorists and other threats to U.S. national security” along with “support for unlawful antisemitic harassment or violence.”

A notable example provided in the document is explicit support for Hamas, the Palestinian militant organization. The inclusion of such a specific reference underscores the administration’s increased concern about extremism and anti-American sentiment potentially entering U.S. borders through educational visa channels.

This initiative appears to be another strategic move by the Trump administration to penalize American academic institutions, particularly those criticized for their handling of pro-Palestinian demonstrations on campuses. The administration has often accused elite colleges and universities of harboring both antisemitic ideologies and liberal political leanings. This directive also aligns with a broader push to curb legal immigration, which complements the administration’s ongoing efforts to address undocumented immigration domestically.

The cable instructs consular officers to pay particular attention to “applicants who demonstrate a history of political activism,” with an emphasis on determining whether such individuals are likely to continue their activism while in the United States. This applies not only to first-time student visa applicants but also to returning students seeking visa renewals.

Consular officials are told to create “detailed case notes” of their digital investigations and to “take screenshots to preserve the record against possible later alteration or loss of the information.” This instruction implies a need for robust documentation, potentially for use in future reviews or appeals, should questions about an individual’s intentions arise later.

The cable makes clear that the scope of “online presence” extends beyond basic social media activity. It includes data found in online databases such as LexisNexis, signaling a comprehensive approach to digital background checks. By expanding the definition, the administration appears intent on capturing a wide spectrum of information, potentially revealing ideological affiliations or troubling past behavior.

Importantly, none of the online indicators outlined in the cable would in themselves automatically disqualify an applicant from receiving a visa under current U.S. immigration law. However, the discovery of such content is meant to prompt further evaluation by consular officers. The goal is to assess whether the applicant is likely to follow U.S. laws and “engage only in activities consistent with his nonimmigrant visa status.”

While The Free Press first reported the existence of the cable, its acquisition by POLITICO sheds additional light on the evolving direction of U.S. immigration policy under the Trump administration, particularly as it relates to students and educational exchanges.

Earlier, in May, POLITICO reported that the State Department was considering expanding its social media screening procedures, which had already applied to a subset of student visa applicants, to include all applicants. That same month, the department had instructed its embassies to suspend scheduling new interviews for student visa applicants. These pauses appeared to be in preparation for the implementation of more intensive screening methods.

Subsequently, by the end of May, the State Department initiated a targeted screening pilot program for applicants planning to study, teach, or participate in educational programs at Harvard University. That cable, which laid the foundation for the broader screening strategy, did not specify what kinds of online content might be viewed as problematic or “derogatory.” Nonetheless, it marked the beginning of a new phase of digital vetting for educational visa seekers.

The latest cable, issued on Wednesday, now permits embassies to resume scheduling student visa interviews. However, it emphasizes that interviews must be conducted in a manner that acknowledges the increased workload resulting from the new vetting requirements. As part of these instructions, the State Department advised embassies to prioritize certain categories of visa applicants.

Embassies are urged to give priority to physicians applying for the “J-1” visa, which is typically used for educational exchange programs. Additionally, students planning to attend U.S. universities where international students make up 15 percent or less of the overall student body should also be prioritized for visa interviews. This criterion suggests an intent to encourage diversity in institutions where international representation is relatively low.

The directive highlights the Trump administration’s intensifying focus on using immigration tools to advance broader political objectives. By linking visa approvals to political and ideological content found online, the administration seems determined to ensure that those entering the U.S. on educational grounds do not bring views deemed incompatible with American values or national security interests.

This move also comes at a politically sensitive time, with growing scrutiny over antisemitism, campus activism, and the intersection of foreign policy and domestic dissent. While critics are likely to view these measures as overreach or an attack on free speech, supporters will likely frame them as a necessary safeguard in a volatile global landscape.

In summary, the State Department has significantly broadened the mandate for vetting foreign student visa applicants by including detailed scrutiny of their online activity. The new policy calls for extensive documentation, prioritization of certain visa categories, and careful evaluation of political and ideological signals in digital spaces. As the administration continues to reshape the nation’s immigration landscape, student visa policy has become one more arena for enforcing its vision of national security and cultural alignment.

H-1B Data Scientist Alleges Exploitation and Humiliation at US Company Amid Visa Pressures

June 18, 2025June 19, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, Technology 0

A 28-year-old data scientist on an H-1B visa has come forward on social media to recount what he describes as a deeply disturbing and unfair experience at his U.S.-based company. His post has sparked conversations around how foreign workers, particularly those on temporary visas, are often subjected to workplace exploitation due to their vulnerable immigration status.

According to the data scientist, he was recruited and brought on board with the expectation of contributing to a meaningful technical project. For five months, he claims to have shouldered a bulk of the groundwork—doing the “heavy lifting” for the project, a phrase he used to indicate the foundational and difficult tasks required to set things up. However, when the time came to work on the core modelling aspect of the project—widely considered the most prestigious and intellectually rewarding phase—he was abruptly sidelined.

He alleges that the modelling work was reassigned to someone else, and in place of that, he was handed a different task that was grueling and considered undesirable by others on the team. As he described it, “Now, when it’s finally time to shine, his manager has swooped in to build the model himself.” The disappointment in his words is clear—after investing months of effort, he felt robbed of the opportunity to showcase his capabilities on the main component of the project.

But the experience, he claims, didn’t just stop at professional marginalization. The data scientist says that his manager has continued to rely on him for technical support while reserving the more visible, high-value work for himself. “His manager still expects him to continue supporting the project only with the technical aspect,” the worker pointed out. This suggests that while he is still heavily involved in the project’s mechanics, he is being systematically excluded from recognition and leadership.

To make matters worse, the young professional says that he’s become the target of what he describes as public shaming within the workplace. In his post, he recounts multiple instances of being mocked during meetings, subjected to what he calls “ridiculous questions” regarding his Python scripts, and being micromanaged to the point of humiliation. These experiences, he notes, have contributed to an increasingly toxic work environment.

He believes that these actions are part of a broader strategy to force him out of the job. “They’re trying to mentally exhaust him into quitting,” he wrote, pointing to the fact that employees on H-1B visas are under immense pressure not to lose their jobs. If an H-1B worker is terminated, they are typically given only a short grace period—currently 60 days—to find a new employer willing to sponsor their visa, or else they risk having to leave the country. In a job market that may not offer immediate opportunities, this timeline places international workers in a precarious position.

Knowing this, the data scientist says, companies can exploit international talent with minimal consequences. “Many H-1B workers also stay silent even when mistreated because losing a job could mean leaving the country. That’s the harsh reality,” he wrote. His experience sheds light on the psychological and emotional burden that accompanies visa uncertainty, particularly for younger professionals who may not have extensive networks or backup plans.

The broader implications of his story point to a systemic issue. Foreign workers, especially those in tech roles, are often brought to the U.S. with the promise of career development and stability. However, many find themselves at the mercy of employers who understand how to leverage the restrictive immigration system to their advantage. The data scientist’s ordeal also calls attention to a recurring pattern seen across various companies: assigning difficult or less desirable tasks to visa holders while reserving the strategic or leadership roles for others.

His story has resonated with many, particularly within the immigrant and tech communities. Several commenters expressed solidarity, sharing similar experiences of being overworked and under-credited. Others noted the psychological tactics sometimes used to push out employees without technically firing them—a move that would trigger visa complications and legal scrutiny.

The public nature of his complaints, however, makes his case somewhat rare. Many visa holders are reluctant to speak out, fearing retaliation or the risk of damaging future job prospects. For those on H-1B visas, being vocal can be a gamble. “Even when you’re humiliated, even when you know it’s wrong, you often stay quiet because your entire life here depends on that job,” one user responded under his post.

The tech industry has long relied on H-1B visa holders to fill roles in data science, engineering, and software development. These positions require advanced skills, and companies often justify the sponsorship of foreign workers by citing talent shortages. However, as the data scientist’s account suggests, the dependence on employer sponsorship creates an imbalance of power, making visa holders more susceptible to mistreatment.

As this case illustrates, mental exhaustion, public shaming, and exclusion from key responsibilities can serve as non-verbal signals meant to push an employee toward resignation. Such tactics are difficult to prove but are widely discussed within communities of foreign workers. The employer-employee relationship under the H-1B framework is often described as “one-sided,” with the employer holding considerable leverage due to the visa dependency.

Ultimately, the data scientist’s experience sheds light on a troubling facet of corporate culture—one that mixes performance management with immigration pressure in a way that can be deeply harmful. His decision to speak publicly, even without naming the company, is being seen as a courageous move to draw attention to an underreported issue affecting thousands of skilled professionals across the United States.

In sharing his story, the young worker has sparked a wider discussion about ethics in the workplace, accountability for managers, and the reforms needed in the H-1B system to protect those who come to the U.S. in search of opportunity but end up feeling trapped and devalued.

Global Perception of the American Dream Shifts Amid Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

June 18, 2025June 19, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

For generations, people around the world viewed the United States as a beacon of opportunity and inclusion. However, recent developments, particularly President Donald Trump’s aggressive stance on immigration, have prompted widespread reassessment of this ideal. With protests erupting across Los Angeles, on college campuses, and within religious communities, many are reconsidering the once-cherished notion of pursuing the American dream.

According to Edwin van Rest, CEO of Studyportals—a platform that monitors real-time interest from international students considering studying abroad—the current sentiment from Washington signals exclusion. “The message coming from Washington is that you are not welcome in the United States,” he said. His organization’s data shows that international interest in studying in America has dropped to its lowest point since the COVID-19 pandemic. He added, “The fact is, there are great opportunities elsewhere.”

America has long cultivated a romanticized image of itself as a land open to immigrants. While this vision remains powerful, the truth has always been more complex, with race and ethnicity playing significant roles in determining who is truly welcomed. Despite this, the allure of America has endured, powered in part by a strong economy that continues to attract millions each year. This influx has driven the population past 340 million.

Yet, signs from various industries such as tourism, education, entertainment, and trade suggest that the dream is fading for foreigners who once flocked to the U.S. for a better life. A recent Pew Research Center survey, conducted between January and April, revealed that public opinion of the U.S. declined over the past year in 15 of the 24 countries polled.

Trump and many of his followers argue that undocumented migrants pose a risk to national security, employment, and cultural identity. However, his sweeping immigration policies have also affected individuals legally present in the country, making even prospective tourists hesitant about visiting. Adding to the unease is Trump’s global trade war and his stance against international students who support pro-Palestinian causes—moves that are hard to forget among those abroad who once dreamed of participating in America’s tradition of free speech and opportunity.

An Australian Reddit user, Duncan Greaves, encapsulated this global sentiment when advising someone contemplating a U.S. vacation: “The chances of something truly horrific happening are almost certainly tiny… Basically it’s like the Dirty Harry quote: ‘Do you feel lucky?’”

Ironically, Trump himself is closely connected to immigration. Not only has he married two immigrants—Ivana Trump from what is now the Czech Republic and Melania Trump from Slovenia—but his grandfather, Friedrich Trump, was an immigrant from Germany. During a recent Oval Office meeting, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz even presented Trump with a framed copy of his grandfather’s birth certificate. Friedrich Trump had emigrated from Germany in 1885 amid war and economic hardship.

After building a fortune in the U.S. and obtaining citizenship, Friedrich Trump tried to return to Germany but was expelled for failing to fulfill military service obligations. In a letter to Luitpold, prince regent of Bavaria, he wrote, “Why should we be deported? This is very, very hard for a family. What will our fellow citizens think if honest subjects are faced with such a decree — not to mention the great material losses it would incur.”

These details reflect both the promise and the precariousness of the immigrant experience—something the Trump family has personally encountered.

Immigration has undeniably reshaped American culture and demographics. In 2024, immigration drove U.S. population growth to its highest rate in 23 years, pushing the total to over 340 million, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Nearly 2.8 million more people immigrated to the country in 2024 than in the previous year, partly due to revised methods that now include individuals admitted for humanitarian reasons. Net international migration was responsible for 84% of the nation’s 3.3 million-person increase.

In fact, immigration was the sole driver of population growth in 16 states that would have otherwise seen declines, according to the Brookings Institution.

Still, views on immigration remain deeply divided. While many Americans see it as a source of talent and labor, Trump has long regarded it as an “invasion.” Since returning to the White House, he has implemented an expansive immigration crackdown that has tested the boundaries of presidential authority. His administration has often found itself at odds with federal judges over actions that include deporting individuals, revoking visas, and transferring deportees to third countries.

Unlike during his first term, Trump has not shied away from controversial immigration policies this time around. Immigration has become his top issue in public opinion polls, solidifying his standing among Republicans and reflecting a broader change in public sentiment.

A survey conducted in June by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research showed that 46% of U.S. adults approved of Trump’s immigration policies—nearly 10 percentage points higher than his ratings on the economy or trade. Notably, the poll was conducted before protests began in Los Angeles and did not include questions about Trump’s decision to deploy military forces there.

While the United States continues to be seen as an economic superpower, its global image is shifting. Pew’s polling indicates that more people now view China as the world’s top economy. Whether Trump’s policies will lead to a tangible decline in international students and others who once looked to America for safety and opportunity remains uncertain.

Studyportals, based in the Netherlands, reported a significant drop in interest among international students. Weekly pageviews for U.S. degree programs fell by half from January 5 to the end of April. If this pattern continues, the U.S. could lose even more ground to competing nations like the United Kingdom and Australia.

“International students and their families seek predictability and security when choosing which country to trust with their future,” said Fanta Aw, CEO of NAFSA, an organization representing international educators. “The U.S. government’s recent actions have naturally shaken their confidence in the United States.”

The changing global perspective on the United States is evident. What was once seen as the ultimate destination for personal freedom and opportunity is now viewed with increasing skepticism. The American dream, while not entirely extinguished, is being reconsidered by those abroad—many of whom are now setting their sights on other nations where they feel more welcome, more secure, and more hopeful.

US Raises Travel Advisory for India to Level 2, Citing Crime and Terrorism Risks

June 18, 2025June 19, 2025 Staff ReporterTravel, USA 0

The United States has recently updated its travel advisories ahead of the anticipated summer travel surge, and India, one of the world’s most populated countries, has been given a revised security classification. The U.S. State Department has now raised its travel warning for India to a Level 2 advisory, encouraging travelers to maintain heightened awareness while visiting the country.

In the updated notice, the department urged Americans to be cautious during their stay in India, citing concerns over crime and terrorism. The advisory clearly states, “Exercise increased caution in India due to crime and terrorism. Some areas have increased risk.” It points to incidents such as rape, violent crimes, and terrorism as notable threats. Tourist destinations and areas with high foot traffic are considered potential targets, and travelers are advised to be vigilant when visiting such places.

The travel advisory also identifies specific regions that American citizens are strongly discouraged from visiting. These include parts of eastern Maharashtra, northern Telangana, and western West Bengal. The State Department explained that these areas are especially risky because American authorities do not have direct access to them in case of emergencies. “Due to the risks, U.S. government employees working in India must obtain special authorization to travel to these areas,” the department clarified.

In addition to identifying high-risk areas, the advisory also includes guidelines on how visitors should conduct themselves to stay safe and respectful. American travelers are encouraged to comply with Indian laws and customs at all times. This includes restrictions on certain technologies and advice for personal safety. The State Department highlighted that devices such as GPS trackers and satellite phones are banned in India. Women are advised to avoid traveling alone, and all travelers are recommended to exercise the same caution they would in any unfamiliar foreign country.

Moreover, the State Department gave some areas the most severe warning possible. Jammu and Kashmir, for instance, has been labeled as a Level 4 risk area, meaning “Do Not Travel.” The advisory mentions that this region frequently experiences civil unrest and terrorist activity. The area lies along the Line of Control separating India and Pakistan, and tourist destinations like Srinagar, Gulmarg, and Pahalgam in the Kashmir Valley are also included in the warning.

Other parts of India have also received the Level 4 designation. Certain regions in central and eastern India, for example, are known for activities by political extremists. These groups have carried out terrorist attacks targeting law enforcement, paramilitary personnel, and government officials. Such incidents increase the level of danger and make these areas highly unsafe for visitors.

The northeastern state of Manipur has similarly been categorized under Level 4. According to the advisory, the area has witnessed considerable violence and displacement of communities in recent times. This ongoing instability makes it particularly hazardous for foreign travelers.

Furthermore, the advisory advises Americans to reconsider travel to several states in northeastern India. Insurgent groups in these regions have carried out bombings and other forms of violence, creating an unpredictable security environment. While not under the highest threat level, these areas still pose a significant risk and should be approached with caution.

The U.S. Embassy in India is situated in the capital, New Delhi. It serves as the primary point of contact for American citizens in the country and is tasked with providing consular assistance during emergencies or other travel-related issues. Given the current travel advisory, American visitors are strongly encouraged to stay connected with the embassy during their time in India and to register their travel plans when possible.

In sum, the updated travel advisory for India reflects a complex landscape of safety concerns, ranging from urban crime to political violence and terrorism. While the overall country has been classified under a Level 2 advisory—suggesting travelers should “exercise increased caution”—multiple regions within India are considered extremely dangerous and should be avoided altogether. These designations are based on recent developments, ongoing threats, and limited access for emergency assistance in some areas.

By updating this advisory, the United States aims to provide its citizens with clear and timely information that can help them make informed decisions when planning international travel. As always, the priority remains the safety and well-being of U.S. nationals abroad. Travelers are reminded to remain alert, follow local laws and customs, and heed the recommendations laid out by the State Department.

Siemens Consortium Wins Key Contract for India’s Mumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet Train Signalling Systems

June 18, 2025June 19, 2025 Staff ReporterIndia, Technology 0

India’s first bullet train project connecting Ahmedabad and Mumbai is moving forward steadily despite experiencing various delays over the years. In a significant development, a consortium led by Siemens has been awarded a crucial contract by the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSRCL) to handle the signalling and telecommunications systems for this high-speed rail corridor.

The consortium includes Dineshchandra R Agrawal (DRA) Infracon Private Limited, Siemens Limited, and Siemens Mobility GmbH. Together, these firms will be responsible for delivering and implementing state-of-the-art signalling and telecommunication systems that are vital for operating the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train efficiently and safely.

As part of this contract, Siemens will be deploying the European Train Control System (ETCS) Level 2, which is an advanced signalling and train control mechanism. This system is capable of supporting train operations at speeds of up to 350 kilometres per hour. It offers key features such as real-time monitoring, continuous wireless connectivity for communication, and a centralised traffic control mechanism. These capabilities ensure that the train can function with high precision and safety standards expected from modern high-speed rail systems.

The ETCS Level 2 system is not new to global rail infrastructure. It has already been successfully adopted and implemented in more than 50 countries around the world. Its selection for India’s first bullet train project underscores the nation’s intention to align with globally accepted best practices in rail safety and technology.

The National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSRCL), the government-owned entity overseeing the bullet train venture, is in charge of managing and executing all aspects of this pioneering infrastructure initiative. NHSRCL has been entrusted with transforming India’s rail transport landscape through the introduction of high-speed rail services that match international standards.

In an official communication, Siemens Limited confirmed the awarding of the order, describing it as being worth approximately Rs 4,100 crore in total. The company’s specific share in this contract stands at Rs 1,230 crore. This amount will cover Siemens Limited’s responsibilities in designing, installing, and maintaining the advanced signalling and telecommunication systems over the long term.

According to Siemens Limited’s official statement, “The order valued at approximately Rs. 4,100 crores, includes Siemens Limited’s share of Rs 1,230 crore for the design, installation, and long-term maintenance of advanced signaling and telecommunications technologies.”

The company also elaborated on the execution timeline and maintenance plan for the project. “The project is expected to be executed over a period of 54 months, with Siemens providing 15 years of maintenance services, ensuring lifecycle reliability,” the statement further noted.

This approach indicates that Siemens is not only tasked with the initial installation but is also responsible for ensuring that the systems remain functional and reliable for a significant duration following completion. This long-term commitment reflects a focus on durability and operational consistency.

Speaking on behalf of Siemens Limited, Sunil Mathur, the managing director and chief executive officer of the company, expressed both pride and confidence in undertaking such an important national assignment. He said, “As a consortium, we are proud to partner with National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited, in the prestigious high-speed rail project. This project reflects our commitment to ‘Make in India’ and delivering technologies that promote sustainable and future-ready mobility.”

Mathur’s remarks underline the broader significance of this contract, which not only advances India’s transport infrastructure but also reinforces the government’s ‘Make in India’ initiative. By sourcing technologies that are both cutting-edge and tailored for the future, the project aims to pave the way for a modernised rail network across the country.

The Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train project is a central element of India’s high-speed rail ambitions. Once completed, it will drastically reduce travel time between the two cities and serve as a blueprint for future high-speed rail corridors in other parts of the country.

Despite earlier hurdles, such as land acquisition challenges and shifts in construction timelines, the project appears to be gaining fresh momentum. The awarding of this crucial contract suggests that groundwork for operational readiness is well underway.

The involvement of Siemens, a global leader in rail technology and infrastructure, adds further credibility to the technical execution of the project. With a robust track record in supplying and maintaining rail systems worldwide, Siemens brings both experience and technological expertise to the table.

Furthermore, the inclusion of Indian partner Dineshchandra R Agrawal (DRA) Infracon Private Limited as part of the consortium signifies a balanced approach combining international know-how with domestic implementation capabilities. This collaborative model is in line with current trends in large-scale infrastructure development, where global partnerships enhance both speed and quality of delivery.

In essence, the integration of the ETCS Level 2-based signalling and communication system is a key milestone in making the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train operational. These systems are essential to ensure that the trains can run at high speeds while maintaining stringent safety and communication standards.

Overall, the contract signifies a major step forward for the bullet train initiative, reinforcing India’s aspirations to transform its rail transportation network into a modern, efficient, and world-class system. With clear timelines, advanced technologies, and experienced players on board, the project is now poised to take significant strides towards completion.

UN Nuclear Chief Raises Concerns About Potential Contamination at Iran’s Natanz Facility After Israeli Strike

June 17, 2025June 18, 2025 Staff ReporterDiplomacy, World 0

The head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog has expressed serious concerns over possible radiological and chemical contamination at Iran’s primary nuclear enrichment center in Natanz. This follows a recent Israeli military strike targeting the facility. While radiation levels outside the site remain within safe limits, the situation inside the complex poses several hazards, especially involving radioactive and toxic materials.

Rafael Mariano Grossi, Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), addressed an emergency session of the agency’s board in Vienna on Monday. The meeting was called at Russia’s request to discuss the consequences of the Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. During his remarks, Grossi acknowledged the dangers within the Natanz compound but also sought to reassure the international community that no immediate radiological threat had been detected beyond the facility.

“The level of radioactivity outside the Natanz site has remained unchanged and at normal levels, indicating no external radiological impact to the population or the environment from this event,” Grossi stated.

Despite the absence of external radiation risks, the IAEA chief highlighted a significant concern for workers and inspectors inside the facility due to the potential release of uranium hexafluoride gas. This compound is produced when uranium is mixed with fluorine during the enrichment process. Grossi explained that uranium hexafluoride is not only highly corrosive and reactive but also exceptionally hazardous if inhaled.

“The risk can be effectively managed with appropriate protective measures, such as using respiratory protection devices while inside the facilities,” Grossi added.

He warned that the material’s chemical toxicity could pose serious health risks, especially because it can burn human tissue upon contact and is deadly if inhaled in even moderate amounts. Experts have also noted that the compound is highly volatile and can quickly spread if containment is compromised.

Grossi emphasized that the agency’s ability to fully assess the situation is being hindered by the lack of timely technical information from Iran. This data is essential to evaluate any environmental and health impact resulting from the strike. Without proper insight into the facility’s internal condition, the IAEA cannot effectively monitor the consequences or provide appropriate support.

“Amid these challenging and complex circumstances, it is crucial that the IAEA receives timely and regular technical information about the facilities and their respective sites,” Grossi said. “Without information, the U.N. agency cannot accurately assess the radiological conditions and potential impacts on the population and the environment and cannot provide the necessary assistance.”

Despite the operational difficulties, Grossi reassured the board that U.N. inspectors would remain in Iran. He noted that inspections would resume at the earliest opportunity once safety within the affected areas could be confirmed.

“U.N. inspectors would remain present in Iran and inspect the nuclear facilities as soon as safety conditions allow,” he stated.

The IAEA Director-General issued a stark warning about the broader implications of military actions targeting nuclear sites. He stressed that such operations could trigger unforeseen radiological events, with long-term consequences not only for the immediate area but also for global efforts to maintain nuclear safety and security. Grossi called for urgent diplomatic engagement to prevent further escalation.

“Military escalation threatens lives, increases the chance of a radiological release with serious consequences for people and the environment and delays indispensable work towards a diplomatic solution for the long-term assurance that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon,” he warned.

At the same emergency meeting, Venezuela delivered a joint statement on behalf of several nations, including Iran and Russia. The group condemned the Israeli strike, calling it a violation of international norms and a threat to global security. The statement was made behind closed doors, and diplomats who were present shared its contents anonymously due to the confidential nature of the discussions.

According to these diplomats, the joint statement denounced what it described as “an unprovoked and aggressive act” against Iran’s peaceful nuclear infrastructure. The coalition expressed support for Iran’s right to develop nuclear technology for civilian purposes under international oversight and called for restraint from all parties involved in the ongoing tensions.

Meanwhile, satellite imagery has provided a clearer picture of the physical damage inflicted on the Natanz site. Analysis conducted by The Associated Press using images from Planet Labs PBC revealed widespread destruction across several parts of the complex. Photographs taken on Saturday, shortly after the Israeli operation, show that multiple structures at the facility had been either significantly damaged or completely destroyed.

Among the affected structures were those identified by nuclear experts as essential for supplying power to the enrichment systems. These buildings play a crucial role in maintaining the functionality of the centrifuges and other machinery used to process uranium. Their loss could substantially hinder Iran’s enrichment activities, at least temporarily.

The attack and its aftermath come amid already heightened tensions between Iran and Israel over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Israel has repeatedly stated that it will not allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons and has taken preemptive actions in the past to disrupt what it views as a growing threat. Iran, on the other hand, maintains that its nuclear program is solely for civilian energy purposes and remains under the scrutiny of international bodies such as the IAEA.

This latest strike further complicates the already fragile diplomatic landscape surrounding Iran’s nuclear activities. The 2015 nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), has been largely inactive since the United States withdrew from the agreement in 2018. Efforts to revive the deal have stalled amid growing mistrust, regional tensions, and now, escalating military actions.

Grossi’s remarks also highlighted the precarious balance the IAEA must maintain in situations involving geopolitical conflict and nuclear oversight. The agency is tasked with ensuring nuclear safety and verifying compliance with international agreements, even in environments where political and military developments pose significant challenges.

The IAEA continues to advocate for a return to diplomacy and transparency, stressing that technical monitoring and access to sites are key pillars of its mission. Without them, the international community is left to speculate about the risks and developments inside facilities like Natanz, with limited tools to verify claims or intervene in a timely manner.

As the situation evolves, the focus remains on ensuring the safety of nuclear materials and the prevention of any release that could harm human populations or the environment. The IAEA’s call for renewed cooperation and de-escalation echoes the broader concern that military interventions near sensitive nuclear infrastructure could lead to unintended and possibly catastrophic consequences.

With no new damage reported at either Natanz or the Isfahan nuclear research site since Saturday, according to Grossi, attention now turns to whether all parties involved will take steps to reduce tensions and re-engage in dialogue.

He concluded his address by reaffirming the IAEA’s commitment to staying engaged in Iran and conducting thorough inspections once conditions allow, underscoring the importance of technical data sharing and peaceful resolution efforts in the interest of global nuclear safety.

Israel-Iran Conflict Escalates Amid G7 Diplomacy and Rising Civilian Toll

June 17, 2025June 18, 2025 Staff ReporterDiplomacy, World 0

The fifth day of open hostilities between Israel and Iran has seen an escalation of attacks, with both countries trading strikes and civilians bearing the brunt of the conflict. The situation has turned increasingly deadly, with at least 224 people reported killed in Iran and 24 fatalities confirmed in Israel since the outbreak of violence.

As the fighting intensifies, U.S. President Donald Trump made the unexpected decision to leave the G7 summit in France a day ahead of schedule, citing the need to return to Washington to deal with the crisis. French President Emmanuel Macron disclosed that the United States had put forward a ceasefire proposal, suggesting a possible diplomatic channel to contain the violence. Trump, in a stark warning, advised Iranians to leave the capital, Tehran, pointing out the severe risk posed to its population of 10 million.

In a statement likely to inflame tensions further, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asserted that the Israeli strikes had dealt a significant blow to Iran’s nuclear ambitions. “I estimate we are sending them back a very, very long time,” he said, referring to the impact of Israeli attacks on key elements of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. According to reports, Israel had targeted three of Iran’s most vital nuclear facilities along with top nuclear scientists. However, the full extent of the destruction remains unknown.

Iran’s state media announced that the death toll from an Israeli strike on the country’s national broadcasting headquarters has increased. The Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) was hit during the series of airstrikes. Two individuals have been confirmed dead: Nima Rajabpour, a news editor, and Masoumeh Azimi, an administrative worker. The Iranian state-run news agency IRNA confirmed the casualties in what they called a targeted strike on a civilian institution.

Meanwhile, the Group of Seven (G7) leaders issued a joint statement on Monday calling for a peaceful resolution to the spiraling Iran-Israel crisis. The statement, initially met with hesitation by President Trump, ultimately received his endorsement after diplomatic language revisions were made. An official familiar with the matter stated that “after changing some of the language in the document — including calls for a diplomatic resolution to the crisis and upholding international law — Trump signed off.”

The finalized G7 declaration included a broad appeal to reduce conflict in the Middle East. “We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza,” read the official statement, attributed to the collective “G7 leaders.” Such wording typically indicates unanimous agreement among participating nations.

The diplomatic efforts appeared to intensify following Trump’s departure from the summit. According to one official familiar with the sequence of events, Trump had earlier signaled he would not endorse the draft version of the G7 statement, which had been crafted primarily by European leaders. However, as the language of the statement was adjusted to align more closely with American positions—particularly the emphasis on diplomacy and international law—Trump agreed to support the document.

The joint declaration reaffirmed the commitment of the G7 nations to restoring calm in the Middle East. “The statement said the G7 leaders ‘reiterate our commitment to peace and stability in the Middle East,’” the official confirmed. Although CNN reached out to the White House for additional comments, no official response was immediately provided.

Trump’s early exit from the summit was seen by some as a sign of the gravity with which Washington is viewing the current hostilities. Before boarding his flight, he emphasized the urgency of monitoring the ongoing military developments between Israel and Iran, implying that further escalation might require a coordinated international response or heightened American involvement.

Back in the Middle East, the human toll continues to rise. The reported casualties in Iran have already reached over 220, signaling the scale and severity of Israel’s air campaign. Iran’s government has yet to provide a comprehensive damage assessment of the targeted nuclear facilities, but analysts warn that any substantial destruction could provoke a long-term crisis over nuclear proliferation and regional security.

The strike on Iran’s state media building has also intensified global concern over civilian targets being drawn into the conflict. The deaths of Nima Rajabpour and Masoumeh Azimi are being cited by Iranian officials as evidence that Israel is deliberately attacking civilian infrastructure, a charge that Israel has not publicly addressed.

On the Israeli side, the casualty count has reached 24, with several regions facing rocket attacks and retaliatory drone strikes. While Israel’s military has not released detailed operational updates, Prime Minister Netanyahu remains adamant that the country’s strategic objectives are being met. “I estimate we are sending them back a very, very long time,” he reiterated, implying that Israel’s targeting of Iran’s nuclear apparatus was both preemptive and successful.

This unfolding conflict now places the global community at a crossroads, with the G7’s joint statement reflecting a shared interest in de-escalation. Still, observers caution that even with high-level diplomatic interventions, the dynamics on the ground could outpace efforts to secure a ceasefire.

Although the call for peace and stability is loud and clear from world leaders, there is growing skepticism about whether either Israel or Iran is ready to halt military operations. The possibility of the crisis spilling over into other flashpoints, such as Gaza and southern Lebanon, is now a major concern for international security analysts.

With the G7 summit concluding and the U.S. President returning home, attention is now turning to how Washington might further influence developments. Whether Trump’s backing of the ceasefire language and the G7 resolution will lead to any immediate diplomatic breakthrough remains uncertain.

At the very least, the joint G7 statement has managed to articulate a consensus among major world powers, even as missiles continue to fly and families mourn their dead. The test ahead lies in translating those words into action—before the cost of war climbs even higher.

Modi Heads to Canada for G-7 Summit Amid Global Conflicts and Diplomatic Reset

June 17, 2025June 18, 2025 Staff ReporterGlobal, Diplomacy 0

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to arrive in Calgary, Canada, on Monday, June 16, 2025, to participate in the G-7 Outreach Summit. The summit, to be hosted in Kananaskis, Alberta, is attracting global attention due to its timing amid intensifying conflicts in both the Middle East and Eastern Europe. The ongoing Israel-Iran tensions and the continued Russia-Ukraine war provide a crucial backdrop to this high-level multilateral gathering. Among the prominent global figures joining Modi at the summit is Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, underscoring the relevance of security discussions in the current geopolitical climate.

Modi’s trip to Canada, which follows a short stopover in Cyprus, is being closely observed as it marks a potential turning point in India-Canada relations. This visit is expected to pave the way for a diplomatic thaw between the two nations following a significant deterioration in ties under former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Relations hit a low point after Trudeau publicly accused the Indian government of involvement in the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a prominent pro-Khalistan activist, on June 18, 2023.

Trudeau’s explosive allegation in September 2023, that “Indian state actors” were behind Nijjar’s murder on Canadian soil, caused a major diplomatic rift. The accusation led to expulsions of diplomats, suspension of talks, and strained people-to-people ties between the two democracies. As Modi now prepares to meet Canada’s new leader, Prime Minister Mark Carney, observers hope for a fresh chapter.

Carney, who assumed office following Trudeau’s departure, has indicated a willingness to move past the previous administration’s tensions. Significantly, he has acknowledged India’s expanding global footprint and emphasized the need for constructive engagement with the world’s largest democracy. In an earlier statement, Carney remarked that “India’s global profile requires engagement,” suggesting his administration is seeking to normalize ties with New Delhi.

This diplomatic reset coincides with Prime Minister Modi’s first appearance at a major international event since India concluded Operation Sindoor in May 2025. The military operation targeted terror networks across Pakistan and received international attention. The G-7 Outreach Summit thus provides Modi with a timely platform to engage with global leaders and position India’s security and diplomatic priorities.

During the summit, Modi is expected to hold discussions with multiple heads of state, including host Prime Minister Carney and other members of the G-7 as well as guest nations. The event promises to be a venue for strategic dialogue, coalition-building, and multilateral coordination. Modi’s interactions at the summit are likely to touch on issues ranging from counterterrorism to economic cooperation and energy security.

The G-7 Outreach Summit, scheduled for Tuesday at noon, will focus on three key themes that reflect the current international climate. The first theme, “Protecting our communities around the world,” is expected to encompass a wide array of discussions, including defense cooperation, counterterrorism, cyber threats, and humanitarian crises. With conflicts like those in Ukraine and Gaza continuing unabated, leaders will deliberate on ways to shield civilians and prevent further escalations.

The second core issue is “Building energy security and accelerating the digital transition.” This topic is highly relevant given the dual challenges posed by geopolitical instability and the global energy crisis. As nations seek alternatives to fossil fuels and aim for sustainable energy sources, digitalization is increasingly becoming a central pillar of national development strategies. The summit is likely to explore avenues for collaboration in clean energy, semiconductor supply chains, and 5G infrastructure.

The third and final theme, “Securing the partnerships of the future,” emphasizes the importance of fostering resilient international alliances. This is particularly crucial at a time when traditional multilateral structures are under stress and new alignments are emerging. The summit may also include deliberations on reforming global institutions and developing mechanisms for inclusive growth and equitable development.

Besides India and Ukraine, the summit will include leaders from Australia, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, and South Korea as special invitees. Their presence signifies the growing recognition that global challenges require broad-based cooperation beyond the G-7 nations. These countries represent diverse regions and bring valuable perspectives to the table, especially in addressing issues like climate change, global trade, and digital equity.

Following his diplomatic engagements in Canada, Prime Minister Modi will depart on Tuesday evening for Zagreb, Croatia, which marks the final leg of his three-nation tour. This visit comes at a critical time for Indian foreign policy, as it seeks to consolidate alliances, rebuild frayed ties, and assert its strategic interests on the global stage.

The upcoming meeting between Modi and Carney is expected to be a closely watched event. While the specifics of the bilateral dialogue are yet to be disclosed, the broader context suggests that both leaders are interested in de-escalating the diplomatic standoff that defined the latter years of Trudeau’s tenure. The murder of Nijjar had cast a long shadow on India-Canada relations, and Modi’s visit is seen as an attempt to move beyond the impasse.

Observers note that the shift in leadership in Canada offers a fresh opportunity for reconciliation. Carney’s pragmatic approach to foreign policy and his willingness to recognize India’s importance in the global order are crucial factors in resetting the bilateral agenda. India, on its part, has consistently rejected Trudeau’s accusations, terming them “absurd” and “politically motivated,” and has maintained that it seeks constructive ties with Ottawa.

As the G-7 Outreach Summit convenes, it also provides a timely forum for leaders to exchange views on managing a world in flux. With the war in Ukraine dragging on, tensions flaring in the Middle East, and economic uncertainties looming, the stakes are high. For India, which has long advocated for multipolarity and reform of global governance institutions, the summit offers a platform to advance its vision of a more balanced and inclusive international order.

Modi’s participation in the G-7 Outreach Summit in Canada represents more than just a diplomatic engagement. It reflects India’s evolving role on the global stage, its readiness to mend fractured ties, and its commitment to working with like-minded nations on shared challenges. As he moves on to Croatia, the outcomes of this summit and his interactions with leaders like Carney will be closely analyzed for signs of strategic alignment and future cooperation.

Experts Question Feasibility and Ethics Behind Trump-Branded Smartphone Initiative

June 17, 2025June 18, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA, Technology 0

Experts are casting serious doubt on the Trump Organization’s claim that its new smartphone, marketed as being entirely made in the United States, can realistically be built domestically. Industry professionals argue that it is currently “virtually impossible” for such a product to be wholly manufactured in the US, especially on the scale required for commercial launch.

The proposed smartphone, which is gold in color and priced at $499 (approximately £367.50), has triggered skepticism from analysts and critics alike. One analyst conveyed to the BBC that the phone’s production claim is largely implausible under present technological and economic circumstances. Furthermore, concerns have arisen about the ethical implications of what appears to be another business initiative leveraging President Donald Trump’s name.

Meghan Faulkner, communications director for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, openly criticized the venture, stating, “It’s unbelievable that the Trump family has created yet another way for President Trump to personally profit while in office.”

In addition to the handset, the initiative includes a new mobile service that will carry a monthly fee of $47.45—a figure that symbolically references Trump’s roles as both the 45th and 47th President of the United States. Trump has publicly stated that he has placed his business ventures into a trust overseen by his children, while the White House has consistently maintained that he makes decisions in the best interest of the American public.

However, Faulkner noted that this new business project introduces familiar ethical dilemmas. These include the possibility that individuals or entities might subscribe in hopes of currying favor with the president, as well as potential conflicts of interest as Trump may influence regulations in the very industry where his family now holds a commercial stake.

Despite declaring the phone will be manufactured in the US, the Trump family has not disclosed which company will be responsible for the production. During an interview on “The Benny Show” podcast, Eric Trump implied that full domestic manufacturing may not be in place for the initial August release, saying, “Eventually, all the phones can be built in the United States of America.”

This ambiguous claim has led technology experts to question the feasibility of such production plans. Many argue that manufacturing smartphones entirely from scratch in the US is not currently viable. Professor Tinglong Dai of Johns Hopkins’ Carey Business School expressed serious skepticism, saying, “They don’t even have a working prototype. It’s extremely unlikely.” He further elaborated, “You would have to have a miracle. You would need to have economies of scale. You would need to have sustainable demand for this kind of product.”

The smartphone initiative also aligns with Trump’s recent public efforts to persuade Apple CEO Tim Cook to move iPhone production for American consumers back to the US. Just last month, Trump threatened to impose a 25% import tax—or more—on iPhones not manufactured within American borders.

Leo Gebbie, an analyst at CCS Insight, noted the logistical challenges involved in making smartphones entirely in the United States, saying that the country “simply does not have the high-tech supply chain” needed for smartphone assembly. This makes a full US-based production timeline by August highly unlikely. However, he allowed for a partial possibility, stating, “It’s possible that the device could be assembled in the US with parts imported from abroad. This might be the most likely outcome that lets the T1 claim American sovereignty.”

Details about the business partner responsible for managing the mobile service and licensing the Trump brand remain scarce. The Trump Organization did not respond to the BBC’s inquiries regarding its business collaborators, ethical criticisms, or specifics behind the “built in the United States” assertion.

In announcing the project, the Trump Organization stated, “Hard-working Americans deserve a wireless service that’s affordable, reflects their values, and delivers reliable quality they can count on.” The plan promises “discounted” international calling for families with members serving abroad in the military. The mobile service also pledges US-based customer support and currently offers the gold-colored handset for pre-order.

This new venture is a continuation of Trump’s longstanding business strategy of licensing his name in exchange for royalties and fees, something he engaged in well before his entry into politics. However, since stepping onto the political stage a decade ago, opportunities to monetize his brand have grown exponentially.

According to his most recent financial disclosure, Trump reported earnings exceeding $600 million last year. These earnings include profits from an array of Trump-branded products such as Bibles, watches, sneakers, and fragrances. Forbes estimated in March that Trump’s net worth had more than doubled from the previous year, now totaling around $5.1 billion. This surge in wealth is partially attributed to his loyal base of supporters, who have boosted the valuation of Truth Social, Trump’s social media platform. Forbes noted that Truth Social accounted for about half of Trump’s total net worth in the past year.

Public reaction to the Trump-branded smartphone has been mixed, especially on social media. While some potential buyers expressed enthusiasm, others ridiculed the concept. One user on X (formerly Twitter) asked, “Where do I have to wait in line to buy the new Trump phone?” In contrast, critics mocked the design and made humorous references to Trump’s personal communication style, joking that all texts from the phone might appear in capital letters.

Meanwhile, Trump has also faced protest from critics accusing him of corruption, particularly as he hosts events such as cryptocurrency galas that raise additional concerns about conflicts of interest. The broader debate over Trump’s financial entanglements continues to attract attention, particularly in light of his growing wealth and expanding business ventures.

In terms of the mobile industry landscape, the US market is primarily dominated by three major carriers: AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile, all of which offer monthly service plans starting below $40. A number of smaller mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) also exist, leasing capacity from the big players to serve niche customer segments with either lower prices or customized plans.

According to a 2024 report by the Federal Communications Commission, the largest of these MVNOs have fewer than 10 million subscribers. One notable example is Mint Mobile, which was once backed by actor Ryan Reynolds. T-Mobile acquired Mint Mobile in 2023 for $1.35 billion, with Reynolds reportedly owning a 25% stake. That share may have netted the actor as much as $300 million from the sale.

As Trump continues to expand his branding empire, questions over the practicality, legality, and ethics of such endeavors remain unresolved. Whether this new smartphone project proves to be a commercial success or another political flashpoint remains to be seen.

Pope Leo XIV Calls for Justice and Hope in Serving the Poor

June 17, 2025June 18, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld, Religion 0

Pope Leo XIV has called attention to the spiritual and material dimensions of poverty in his message for the ninth World Day of the Poor, emphasizing that recognizing God is the true measure of wealth. In the message released by the Vatican press office on June 13, the Holy Father stated, “The gravest poverty is not to know God,” adding that when we walk through life with God, “we discover the real treasure that we need.”

The Pope warned against putting too much trust in material possessions, observing that “wealth often disappoints and can lead to tragic situations of poverty — above all the poverty born of the failure to recognize our need for God and of the attempt to live without him.”

Scheduled for observance on Sunday, November 16, the World Day of the Poor was introduced to urge the Church and society to place the needs of the impoverished at the center of attention. Much like Pope Francis once denounced a growing “globalization of indifference,” Pope Leo raised concern about becoming “hardened and resigned” in response to emerging forms of destitution. His message encourages reflection on social responsibilities, rooted in the belief that God’s creation intends for the goods of the earth and the results of human labor to be shared equitably.

He supported this point by quoting St. Augustine: “You give bread to a hungry person; but it would be better if none were hungry, so that you would have no need to give it away. You clothe the naked, but would that all were clothed and that there be no need for supply this lack.”

Pope Leo also drew attention to the moral obligation behind helping the poor, stating that this is “a matter of justice before it is a question of charity.” He emphasized that many of us may find ourselves losing things we once took for granted, such as “a home, sufficient food for each day, access to health care and a good education, information, religious freedom, and freedom of expression.”

For him, the World Day of the Poor serves as a reminder that the poor should remain central to the Church’s mission — not only in charitable works but also in the broader message it preaches. “God took on their poverty in order to enrich us through their voices, their stories, and their faces,” the pontiff wrote, noting that the message was signed on June 13, the feast day of St. Anthony of Padua, patron saint of the poor.

He was clear in stating that the poor “are not a distraction for the Church but our beloved brothers and sisters.” According to him, the poor offer a living witness to the Gospel through “their lives, their words, and their wisdom.”

Importantly, the Pope rejected the view of the poor as merely passive recipients of aid. Instead, he described them as “creative subjects” who challenge the Church “to find novel ways of living out the Gospel today.” In this light, he called for every kind of poverty to be seen as a call “to experience the Gospel concretely and to offer effective signs of hope.”

Despite being deprived of material security, the poor often embody a more resilient form of faith. “They cannot rely on the security of power and possessions; on the contrary, they are at their mercy and often victims of them. Their hope must necessarily be sought elsewhere,” the Pope explained. He added that by placing God at the center of our lives as “our first and only hope,” we transition “from fleeting hopes to a lasting hope.”

The message also quoted Pope Francis’ Evangelii Gaudium, which declares that the greatest injustice suffered by the poor is “the lack of spiritual care.” Echoing this, Pope Leo commented, “This is a rule of faith and the secret of hope: All this earth’s goods, material realities, worldly pleasures, economic prosperity, however important, cannot bring happiness to our hearts.”

He went on to reflect on the theological virtues of faith, hope, and charity, asserting that “hope is born of faith, which nourishes and sustains it on the foundation of charity, the mother of all virtues. All of us need charity, here and now.”

Charity, according to Pope Leo, is not just a private virtue but a social commandment that should guide our actions toward the common good. “Those who lack charity not only lack faith and hope; they also rob their neighbors of hope,” he stated.

He emphasized the foundational nature of hope in Christian belief by likening it to an anchor, a symbol used since the early Church. “Amid life’s trials, our hope is inspired by the firm and reassuring certainty of God’s love, poured into our hearts by the Holy Spirit. That hope does not disappoint,” he said.

Addressing the structural dimensions of poverty, the Pope highlighted the necessity of engaging actively with history and society. “Poverty has structural causes that must be addressed and eliminated. In the meantime, each of us is called to offer new signs of hope that will bear witness to Christian charity, just as many saints have done over the centuries.”

He identified hospitals and schools as essential tools for reaching the marginalized, arguing that these institutions “should be part of every country’s public policy.” Yet he lamented, “Wars and inequalities often prevent this from happening.”

He pointed to grassroots initiatives as beacons of hope, referencing “group homes, communities for minors, centers for listening and acceptance, soup kitchens, homeless shelters, and schools for low-income students.” According to the Pope, “How many of these quiet signs of hope often go unnoticed and yet are so important for setting aside our indifference and inspiring others to become involved in various forms of volunteer work!”

In conclusion, Pope Leo called for the global community and Church leaders to formulate policies targeting both old and emerging forms of poverty. “Labor, education, housing, and health are the foundations of a security that will never be attained by the use of arms,” he stressed. Expressing optimism, he said, “I express my appreciation for those initiatives that already exist, and for the efforts demonstrated daily on the international level by great numbers of men and women of goodwill.”

With a blend of spiritual reflection and practical guidance, Pope Leo XIV’s message for the World Day of the Poor seeks to reawaken compassion, deepen faith, and spur action for justice in a world that continues to be marked by inequality and suffering.

Trump Blocked Israeli Plan to Assassinate Iran’s Supreme Leader Amid Escalating Tensions

June 16, 2025June 17, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

U.S. President Donald Trump reportedly intervened to halt an Israeli proposal to assassinate Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to information from two U.S. officials cited by Reuters. This revelation adds a new dimension to the ongoing crisis involving Iran, Israel, and the broader international community.

A senior official from the Trump administration disclosed the rationale behind the decision, emphasizing that such an action was unwarranted at that point. “Have the Iranians killed an American yet? No. Until they do, we’re not even talking about going after the political leadership,” the official was quoted as saying. This statement underscores the administration’s hesitancy to endorse escalatory measures in the absence of direct Iranian aggression against U.S. citizens.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, when asked to respond to the report, avoided providing a direct confirmation or denial. “There’s so many false reports of conversations that never happened, and I’m not going to get into that,” he said. However, Netanyahu did express a strong stance regarding Israel’s approach, stating, “But I can tell you, I think that we do what we need to do, we’ll do what we need to do. And I think the United States knows what is good for the United States.”

Reuters reported that American officials have maintained regular contact with their Israeli counterparts throughout the unfolding crisis. The discussions intensified following a substantial Israeli offensive aimed at crippling Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Though it remains uncertain whether Trump personally communicated the veto to Israeli officials, multiple sources confirmed his consistent dialogue with Netanyahu during this critical period.

The situation became more volatile with Israel’s military actions against Iran, which began on a Friday and have since continued. In a separate appearance on Fox News, Netanyahu hinted that the ultimate goal of the military campaign could be regime change in Iran. He also acknowledged informing President Trump before the operations were initiated, reinforcing the idea that the U.S. was not caught off guard.

Despite the high tensions and military developments, Trump adopted a mixed approach in his public communications. He issued a forceful warning to Tehran via his social media platform, Truth Social, asserting that the U.S. military would respond with overwhelming force if Iran dared to target American assets. “If we are attacked in any way, shape, or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US armed forces will come down on you at levels never seen before,” Trump declared. This message served as a deterrent against potential Iranian retaliation amid the unfolding conflict.

Iran had reportedly warned that it would target military bases and naval assets belonging to the U.S., the United Kingdom, and France if they interfered with Iranian strikes against Israel. These threats heightened the international concern surrounding the expanding crisis in the Middle East.

However, Trump did not rely solely on threats. He also left the door open for diplomacy, expressing hope that a resolution could be achieved. “We can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel and end this bloody conflict,” he stated. This dual message — combining military readiness with diplomatic outreach — aimed to balance deterrence with the possibility of peaceful negotiation.

Amid the mounting hostilities, Trump reiterated his longstanding belief in the value of diplomacy and called on both Iran and Israel to seek a negotiated settlement. He referenced his own track record as a peacemaker, asserting that his administration had played a pivotal role in resolving other international disputes. “I never got credit” for these accomplishments, he lamented, pointing to previous efforts to facilitate peace between Serbia and Kosovo, as well as helping ease tensions between Egypt and Ethiopia over past disagreements.

In a separate development, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan engaged with Trump in a phone call on Sunday, offering Turkey’s help as a mediator in the intensifying conflict. Erdogan suggested that Ankara could play a constructive role in addressing the nuclear standoff and reducing the likelihood of further violence between Israel and Iran.

Meanwhile, the conflict on the ground showed no signs of abating. Israel launched a third consecutive day of airstrikes targeting multiple locations within Iran. Some of these strikes reportedly penetrated Iranian air defense systems and reached urban centers, raising concerns about civilian casualties and wider regional instability. Israeli officials warned that additional attacks could follow, suggesting the situation might deteriorate further.

The toll from these attacks has already been severe. According to Human Rights Activists, a Washington-based non-governmental organization that monitors the situation in Iran, at least 406 people have been confirmed dead, and 654 others have sustained injuries as a result of the airstrikes. These figures have not been verified by the Iranian government, which has yet to release official statistics regarding casualties. The lack of transparency has made it difficult for international observers to fully assess the scale of the humanitarian impact.

Efforts to de-escalate the crisis through diplomacy have also suffered setbacks. Talks that were scheduled to address both the immediate violence and broader concerns regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions have reportedly been canceled due to the ongoing military activity. The collapse of these negotiations represents a significant blow to those hoping for a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

The series of developments paints a troubling picture of a rapidly deteriorating situation, with potential implications far beyond the region. Trump’s reported decision to prevent an Israeli attempt to assassinate Iran’s supreme leader reflects the delicate balance that global leaders must maintain in the face of escalating threats. While military responses remain on the table, there is still some hope that diplomatic engagement might avert an all-out war.

In the end, Trump’s approach seems to straddle two divergent paths — one of power projection and another of negotiation. His administration’s decision to restrain an Israeli strike on Iran’s political leadership, combined with his repeated calls for diplomacy, suggests an awareness of the potentially catastrophic consequences of unchecked escalation. Whether these efforts will lead to de-escalation or whether the region will spiral further into conflict remains uncertain.

With Israel continuing its military operations and Iran threatening retaliation, the international community faces a critical test. The choices made in the coming days could determine not only the fate of the current standoff but also the broader trajectory of Middle Eastern geopolitics in the years to come.

American Catholics Express Optimism Over First U.S.-Born Pope Leo XIV

June 16, 2025June 17, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA, Religion 0

Just over a month into Pope Leo XIV’s historic papacy as the first pontiff born in the United States, a fresh poll reveals that American Catholics are embracing their new religious leader with considerable enthusiasm. The survey, conducted by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, indicates that nearly two-thirds of American Catholics hold a “very” or “somewhat” favorable opinion of Pope Leo. In contrast, only a small minority—fewer than 1 in 10—express unfavorable views. Meanwhile, around 3 in 10 American Catholics say they don’t know enough about him to form an opinion.

Outside the Catholic community, many Americans are still evaluating Pope Leo’s leadership, but the overall sentiment among those who do have an opinion is largely positive. The poll shows that 44% of U.S. adults view the new pope favorably, while about the same percentage say they haven’t yet formed an opinion. Again, just 1 in 10 adults report an unfavorable impression.

This wave of support cuts across political and ideological lines, which is particularly significant given the current polarization within the church. As Pope Leo vows to foster unity within the Catholic community, people from various backgrounds and beliefs are expressing hope for what his tenure might bring.

Terry Barber, a 50-year-old Catholic from Sacramento, California, and a Democrat, believes Pope Leo could lead the Church toward a more inclusive future. “I’m optimistic. Certainly, the first pope from the United States is significant,” Barber remarked. “Since he worked under the previous pope, I’m sure he has similar ideas, but certainly some that are original, of his own. I’m looking forward to seeing what, if any changes, come about under his leadership.”

The poll highlights Pope Leo’s broad bipartisan appeal. Roughly half of Democrats view him favorably, while about 4 in 10 Republicans and independents share that sentiment. Interestingly, Republicans appear more hesitant to form an immediate opinion—about half of them say they don’t know enough about the pope, compared to about 4 in 10 Democrats. Still, members of both parties are equally unlikely to view him negatively, with about 1 in 10 expressing unfavorable views in each group.

Victoria Becude, a 38-year-old Catholic and Republican from Florida, expressed enthusiasm for the pope’s potential influence on American spirituality. “I’m rooting for him,” she said. “I hope that America can get back to faith, and I hope he can do that.”

While political affiliations don’t always match religious leanings, the survey found no significant partisan divide among Catholics in how they perceive Pope Leo. Believers from both liberal and conservative Catholic backgrounds are hopeful that he can help mend divisions that widened during Pope Francis’ tenure.

During a recent prayer, Pope Leo criticized the global surge in nationalist political movements and called for reconciliation and open dialogue—a reflection of his broader promise to position the Catholic Church as a force for peace.

Pope Leo’s record before becoming pontiff also offers some insight into his approach. As Cardinal Robert Prevost, he played a key role in one of Pope Francis’ most notable reforms by allowing women to serve on the Vatican board that evaluates bishop nominations. However, he has also upheld the Church’s position that women cannot be ordained as priests.

Donald Hallstone, a 72-year-old Catholic living in Oregon, sees opportunity in Leo’s stance. “It’d be great to see women in those roles,” he said, referring to leadership positions within the Church. “Women were not excluded in the first centuries.”

At the same time, more conservative Catholics are hoping that Pope Leo will reinforce traditional doctrines, particularly on issues like same-sex marriage and abortion. Becude shares this view to an extent, stating her opposition to same-sex relationships based on her belief that unions should be between a man and a woman—an opinion she notes Pope Leo shares. However, she diverges from official Church teaching on reproductive rights.

“I don’t believe that they should stop women from having abortions,” Becude explained. “We should have our own rights because you don’t know the circumstances behind the reason why a woman would want the abortion in the first place.”

Although Pope Leo has been in office for only a short time, the early signs suggest that public opinion remains fluid, with much depending on how his papacy unfolds. A large segment of Americans, particularly those from other religious traditions, have not yet formed strong views. The poll shows that about half of born-again Protestants, mainline Protestants, and religiously unaffiliated adults haven’t developed an opinion. Still, unfavorable views remain minimal—roughly 1 in 10 in each of these groups.

Age also appears to influence public sentiment. Older Americans, who are statistically more likely to identify as Catholic, tend to view the pope more favorably. About half of Americans aged 60 and above have a positive impression of Pope Leo. In contrast, among adults under 30, only about 4 in 10 express a favorable view. However, even within this younger demographic, unfavorable opinions are rare—just around 1 in 10.

Mercedes Drink, a 31-year-old from the pope’s hometown of Chicago who now lives in Minnesota, identifies as part of the “religious nones”—those who consider themselves atheist, agnostic, or affiliated with no particular religion. Despite not being a practicing Catholic, Drink sees Pope Leo as a potential agent of change. “It’s cool; I like him because he brings something different,” she said.

“As a young woman, I hope that he can bring change … considering who he is, he brings something new to the table. I hope he opens the world’s eyes to modernizing the church, bringing more people in, having more diversity.”

Whether Pope Leo will fulfill these hopes remains to be seen, but for now, his unique background and early signals have sparked widespread interest and optimism across diverse segments of American society. From lifelong Catholics to curious outsiders, many are watching closely to see how this historic papacy will shape the future of the Catholic Church.

Modi’s Canada Visit for G7 Marks Diplomatic Opportunity Amid Strained India-Canada Relations

June 16, 2025June 17, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is scheduled to visit Canada next week, following an invitation from his Canadian counterpart, Mark Carney, to attend the upcoming Group of Seven (G7) summit. The summit, set to take place from June 15 to 17 in Kananaskis, Alberta, will mark Modi’s return to Canada after nearly a decade. Although India is not a G7 member—which includes Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United States—New Delhi has consistently received invitations to the summit since 2019, signaling India’s increasing clout on the global stage.

Highlighting the rationale behind extending the invitation to Modi despite the recent turbulence in bilateral ties, Canadian Prime Minister Carney stated, “India is the fifth-largest economy in the world, the most populous country in the world and central to supply chains.”

This visit will be Modi’s first to Canada since 2015. Expressing optimism about the upcoming summit and the potential to enhance bilateral cooperation, Modi remarked, “As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada will work together with renewed vigor, guided by mutual respect and shared interests. Look forward to our meeting at the summit.”

Political experts believe that Modi’s presence at the G7 could serve as a critical opening to rebuild fractured ties between India and Canada. Relations between the two countries soured significantly after Canada accused Indian agents of involvement in the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a 45-year-old Canadian citizen and Sikh separatist advocate. Nijjar was known for his activism supporting a separate Sikh homeland, Khalistan, to be carved from Indian territory.

India strongly rejected these allegations, calling them “absurd” and “preposterous.” The dispute escalated to the point where both countries expelled each other’s diplomats in 2023 and 2024, pushing diplomatic relations to a low point. However, expectations for a diplomatic reset have grown since Carney assumed office in March, replacing Justin Trudeau.

According to Meera Shankar, India’s former ambassador to the United States, Modi’s visit “hopefully mark[s] the beginning of a reset in India’s relations with Canada, which have plummeted in recent years over the Canadian allegations on the Nijjar case and India’s belief that Canada indulges Sikh extremism directed against India.” She added that both nations stand to benefit “if the relationship is stabilized, especially in a volatile world.”

The India-Canada partnership includes significant trade and investment flows. In 2023, bilateral trade between the two nations reached around $9 billion. Additionally, Canadian pension funds have invested approximately $55 billion in India. These financial ties underscore the interdependence of both countries. On the demographic side, Canada hosts a vibrant Indian diaspora of nearly two million people, comprising about 5% of the country’s total population. Canada is also a favored destination for Indian students, second only to the United States.

Still, major unresolved issues could hamper progress in healing relations. Central among them is the continued investigation into Nijjar’s assassination. Complicating the matter is Canada’s status as home to the largest Sikh diaspora globally, estimated at around 800,000 people. Within this population are proponents of the Khalistan movement, a fringe separatist group seeking to establish a sovereign Sikh state from parts of India’s Punjab region. This movement is outlawed in India, which has repeatedly urged Canada to take firmer action against its supporters.

Meanwhile, Ottawa has accused New Delhi of orchestrating an expansive campaign against Sikh activists in Canada. This alleged campaign, according to Canadian authorities, has involved intimidation, threats, and even violent acts.

Carney’s decision to invite Modi to the G7 summit has not gone unchallenged. Some Sikh advocacy groups in Canada have expressed strong disapproval, with protests anticipated during Modi’s visit. However, not all Canadian observers view the invitation as controversial. Former Canadian diplomat David Mckinnon applauded the move, saying, “The politics of this decision in Canada, and particularly within the Liberal Party, were not easy, but Carney made the right choice. It’s also notable that the leader of the opposition, Pierre Poilievre, quickly welcomed it.”

Despite these positive sentiments, Mckinnon cautioned against assuming that bilateral ties are fully repaired. “A big outstanding question is whether this trip leads to a mutually agreeable off-ramp from the allegations of Indian government interference in Canada, including involvement in the Nijjar murder, and India’s allegations about Khalistani activities in Canada,” he said.

Diplomatic efforts to strengthen relations have been underway. In the past month, India’s External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar held a phone conversation with Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand. The two leaders discussed steps to broaden economic cooperation and advance common goals.

Ajay Bisaria, India’s former high commissioner to Canada, noted that Modi’s attendance at the G7 summit provides an opening to stabilize bilateral relations while also concentrating on economic and strategic matters. “It always presents a strategic opportunity for Modi to discuss the global commons like climate, trade, supply chains and the broader development agenda with the developed world,” Bisaria explained.

Beyond India-Canada issues, Modi may also use the summit platform to raise other pressing international matters. For example, Bisaria noted that Modi could urge a tougher global stance toward Pakistan, especially following a recent deadly assault on tourists in India-administered Kashmir. New Delhi has blamed Islamabad for backing the attackers, a charge that Pakistan has denied.

In Bisaria’s view, the summit is “a diplomatic opportunity to present India’s current concerns to key world leaders, while China and Pakistan are out of the room.” This absence could allow India to voice its positions without direct opposition from its regional adversaries.

In summary, Modi’s visit to Canada for the G7 summit arrives at a delicate time for bilateral relations. While underlying tensions remain, particularly concerning the Nijjar case and the Khalistan issue, the high-level diplomatic engagement signals potential progress. With growing trade, sizable diaspora connections, and shared democratic values, India and Canada have several incentives to mend ties. Whether Modi’s visit yields a lasting improvement in relations will depend on how both nations navigate their sensitive issues, particularly those that intersect domestic and international politics.

Trump Administration Signals Easing of International Student Visa Restrictions Amid Mounting Pressure

June 15, 2025June 17, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The administration under U.S. President Donald Trump is preparing to lift the temporary suspension on international student visa applications—a decision that could bring significant relief to many students who had already secured admissions at American universities.

Last month, Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a directive instructing U.S. embassies and consulates globally to halt new interviews for foreign student visa applicants. This pause was part of the State Department’s implementation of stricter measures, including an in-depth examination of applicants’ social media profiles.

Rubio also revealed plans to revoke visas for certain Chinese students, particularly those with affiliations to the Chinese Communist Party or those enrolled in sensitive academic disciplines. These actions were part of broader efforts by the Trump administration to tighten scrutiny on foreign nationals in the United States.

However, President Trump struck a different tone on Wednesday by indicating a softening of stance toward Chinese students. As part of ongoing trade negotiations with China, he stated that students from the country would be permitted to study in the U.S. “We will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities,” Trump said in a message posted on Truth Social.

Harvard University has also come under specific scrutiny from the administration. Trump has accused the prestigious institution of admitting too many international students and alleged it was a haven for anti-Semitic sentiments. Consequently, the administration attempted to block Harvard from enrolling international students. However, a federal judge intervened last month to halt that decision, temporarily protecting the university’s ability to admit foreign students.

These abrupt policy changes and conflicting messages have left thousands of prospective and current international students in limbo, casting uncertainty over their academic futures and travel plans. Many students have been unsure whether they could commence their studies as scheduled in the upcoming academic term.

On Tuesday, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce offered a measure of reassurance. She suggested that U.S. embassies and consulates would soon restart visa interviews for international students. Encouraging students to remain alert for available interview slots, she said, “People should watch for those spaces to be open, should continue to apply. This is not going to be a lengthy or an ongoing dynamic.”

Bruce explained that the brief halt in interviews was designed to help U.S. diplomatic posts understand new procedures tied to enhanced background screening. “It was meant for a specific, almost an administrative adjustment,” she clarified, emphasizing that the updated screening process would be implemented swiftly. “And that process, we were told, would be rapid,” she added.

A drawn-out freeze in visa processing would have significant ramifications for American universities, many of which depend heavily on the tuition fees paid by international students. During the 2023-2024 academic year, the U.S. hosted a record high of 1.1 million foreign students. Among these, approximately 90,000 hailed from Arab nations, while over 300,000 were from India. Chinese students, numbering more than 270,000, represented nearly one-quarter of all international enrollees in U.S. institutions, making China the second-largest source of foreign students after India.

The Trump administration’s toughened stance on international student admissions has sparked widespread concern across American campuses and among students overseas. Many fear that such measures threaten not only individual academic careers but also the broader diversity and cultural richness of higher education in the United States.

Dechen Parkel, a 21-year-old student currently attending George Washington University in Washington, D.C., shared his concerns about how reductions in international student populations could impact life on campus. The university has a student body of roughly 2,800 individuals. “We live in a world where it’s like, we’re all connected,” Parkel observed. “It would be sad to see them go, because I just think it’s such a cool part of [Washington] DC. … Being able to interact with people from different cultures is what makes college worth it.”

Meanwhile, an international student at Harvard University expressed deep frustration and disappointment with the visa policy shifts and the administration’s targeting of both the university and foreign students. “I feel like the visa ban is nonsense as it deprives the smartest students in the country to reach their full potential and finish their studies, and it turns the ‘American dream’ into an American nightmare,” the student said. He added, “Morale is definitely down among students as we are all scared not knowing what will come next, but we’re more united than ever.”

This student also noted the personal consequences of the changing immigration environment, stating that he is now reluctant to leave the United States due to fears he might not be allowed to return. His story reflects a broader anxiety that is becoming increasingly common among foreign students, many of whom now feel their educational journeys are under threat.

For decades, the United States has been a top destination for international scholars, who are drawn by the promise of world-class education and opportunities for personal and professional growth. However, the recent policy shifts under the Trump administration have prompted questions about the future of this long-standing academic appeal. While the resumption of visa services would offer immediate relief to some, the ongoing policy uncertainty continues to cast a long shadow over the aspirations of countless students worldwide.

As the Trump administration navigates the complex terrain of trade diplomacy, immigration, and higher education, the lives of international students remain in delicate balance. With campuses relying on their presence for both financial and cultural vitality, and students depending on fair and stable immigration procedures, the next steps taken by U.S. authorities will be closely watched by educational institutions and global communities alike.

Air India Flight AI 171 Crash: A Global Tragedy and a Testament to Shared Humanity

June 15, 2025June 17, 2025 Staff ReporterTravel, World 0

On Thursday, June 12, 2025, a harrowing event unfolded that captured the world’s attention and brought it to a standstill. Air India Flight AI 171, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner en route to London Gatwick, crashed shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad at approximately 1.38 pm IST. The catastrophic nature of the accident, with visuals of thick smoke rising from a densely populated area and grim reports of widespread loss of life, sent shockwaves through every corner of the globe.

In that devastating moment, national boundaries faded, and the digital space transformed into a unified zone of collective mourning, anxiety, and emotional solidarity. The incident became a painful reminder of the fragility of life and the deep, universal connections that unite people beyond their geographies.

Disasters of this magnitude remind us of a truth we often forget—our shared vulnerability. The victims aboard that aircraft were more than just statistics. They were individuals—beloved sons and daughters, cherished parents, close friends, hardworking colleagues—each carrying with them dreams, ambitions, and life stories tragically interrupted. Among them were families eagerly beginning new chapters of life and professionals undertaking business journeys, none imagining their voyage would end in such devastation.

The impact was not confined to the passengers alone. As details emerged, the public learned with sorrow of the collateral damage on the ground, particularly at the B J Medical College hostel. Several medical students lost their lives when the aircraft crashed into the area. These young individuals had dedicated themselves to the noble pursuit of healing and serving others. Their promising futures were wiped out in an instant, adding another layer of heartbreak to an already unimaginable tragedy.

Amid the chaos, there emerged a glimmer of hope—a lone survivor. Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, a 38-year-old British citizen of Indian descent, was miraculously rescued from the wreckage. His survival offered a brief reprieve from the overwhelming despair. Thrown from the plane as part of the fuselage disintegrated mid-air, Vishwash landed near an open field, distanced from the core crash zone. Dazed and injured, he lived through an ordeal that would haunt most forever.

Vishwash shared fragments of his terrifying experience, describing the ascent, a sudden violent jolt, and flashes of green and white before the plane hit the ground. His account not only underscored the randomness of fate but also humanized the catastrophe. Though alive, he bore the emotional burden of knowing his brother Ajay, who was also on board, did not survive.

The immediate response from global leaders illustrated the magnitude of the tragedy. Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed profound grief, saying the crash had “stunned and saddened” the entire country and was “heartbreaking beyond words.” The following day, on June 13, he visited the crash site, walking among the smouldering wreckage and taking in the full scope of the disaster firsthand. He then visited Civil Hospital to meet Vishwash, offering words of encouragement and compassion.

Modi also interacted with other injured survivors and hospital staff, ensuring that every possible measure was being taken for their recovery. Following these visits, he led a high-level meeting focused on coordinating relief and rehabilitation efforts, stressing the importance of extending full support to grieving families.

Expressions of condolences came from around the world. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the scenes as “devastating,” particularly noting the number of British nationals aboard the flight. He assured that updates and necessary support would be continuously provided.

King Charles III and Queen Camilla expressed being in “desperate shock” and extended their “deepest possible sympathy.” They also acknowledged and praised the emergency response teams working tirelessly at the crash site.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio sent his “heartfelt prayers” to those affected, while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, French President Emmanuel Macron, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen all offered messages of sympathy and unity, emphasizing how this tragic event had impacted people beyond India’s borders.

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif also extended his condolences. “We extend our condolences to the families of the victims grieving this immense loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with all those affected by this heartbreaking tragedy,” he said. This show of solidarity, especially from countries with historically tense relationships, illustrated how deeply humanitarian crises can transcend political divides.

At Indian Newslink, we join in mourning the loss of every life touched by this unspeakable tragedy. To those who perished—whether aboard Flight AI 171 or on the ground in Ahmedabad—we pray for eternal peace. We offer our sincerest condolences to the grieving families, whose lives have been forever changed. No words can fully capture their sorrow, but in the shared embrace of a compassionate world, we hope they find a fragment of solace.

This incident is more than just a national tragedy—it is a global one. It reflects how, beneath our cultural and ideological differences, we are fundamentally bound by our common humanity. In the face of suffering, people the world over reached out with kindness, with empathy, and with unity. The reactions and gestures that followed serve as testament to the enduring power of human connection.

Let this horrific event not be remembered solely for its destruction and grief, but also for the way it brought people together. Let it remind us that in moments of darkness, our capacity for compassion, resilience, and solidarity shines through.

The crash of Air India Flight AI 171 is a painful wound on the global psyche, but it also affirms the immense strength of community and shared humanity. As we move forward, may this tragedy ignite a renewed commitment to valuing life, supporting one another, and fostering a world where empathy prevails over indifference—even in the face of unimaginable loss.

USCIS Introduces New Guidelines to Strengthen Integrity of Medical Disability Certifications for Naturalization

June 15, 2025June 17, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration 0

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced the implementation of updated policy guidance aimed at reinforcing the credibility of the Form N-648 process, which grants exceptions to the English and civics requirements for naturalization based on medical disabilities.

This newly issued guidance marks a significant shift in how Form N-648, the Medical Certification for Disability Exceptions, will be evaluated. With a sharper focus on the authenticity of medical documentation and the detection and prevention of fraudulent submissions, USCIS is seeking to safeguard the integrity of the naturalization system. The updated policy reflects concerns that, over the years, certain individuals and medical practitioners have misused the certification process.

Highlighting the importance of the changes, USCIS noted, “Across the country and over the decades, there have been numerous instances where the medical certification process has been exploited.” The agency further stated, “When a medical professional provides a false certification, it not only undermines the purpose of the disability exception but also weakens the credibility of the entire naturalization system because it causes USCIS to naturalize aliens who have not established eligibility for naturalization.”

By default, individuals applying for U.S. citizenship are required to demonstrate proficiency in the English language, as well as a foundational understanding of U.S. history, government, and civic principles. However, applicants suffering from certain physical or developmental disabilities, or mental impairments, may qualify for an exemption from these requirements. To be eligible for such an exemption, applicants must file Form N-648, which documents and confirms their medical condition. This form must be completed and signed by a licensed medical professional who has personally evaluated the applicant.

The updated guidance stipulates that it is not enough for an applicant to simply be diagnosed with a disability. The medical professional must clearly articulate how the specific condition hinders the applicant’s ability to comply with the English and civics testing requirements. As the USCIS emphasized, “The presence of a disability alone is not sufficient.” Rather, the medical certification must directly link the disability or impairment to the applicant’s inability to meet naturalization criteria.

Additionally, the new policy takes aim at practices that may raise red flags for potential fraud. For example, the concurrent submission of multiple Forms N-648 for a single applicant is now flagged as a matter of concern. “Submitting multiple Forms N-648 concurrently may raise concerns about the credibility of the disability or impairment claim and could be subject to further review,” the guidance notes. This measure is designed to deter individuals from attempting to manipulate the process by seeking out multiple or conflicting medical opinions in hopes of receiving a favorable outcome.

This policy change is not an isolated action but part of a broader initiative aligned with recent executive orders aimed at strengthening the integrity of immigration processes. Specifically, the USCIS guidance is in accordance with Executive Order 14148, titled Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions, and Executive Order 14159, Protecting the American People Against Invasion. These directives reflect the current administration’s intent to reverse policies deemed detrimental to immigration accountability and national security, and to prioritize lawful and transparent procedures.

According to USCIS, the updated guidance is being integrated into Volume 12 of the USCIS Policy Manual, which deals specifically with citizenship and naturalization. Importantly, these changes are effective immediately. The guidance will apply to all naturalization applications and associated Form N-648 submissions made on or after June 13, 2025.

By reinforcing these procedures, USCIS is seeking to bolster public confidence in the naturalization process, ensuring that only eligible individuals benefit from exemptions. This change, the agency suggests, will help uphold the legitimacy of the nation’s immigration system, protecting it from abuse while continuing to provide accommodations for genuinely deserving applicants.

In essence, the revised guidance strives to strike a balance between compassion and compliance. It allows exemptions for individuals with legitimate medical conditions but simultaneously introduces necessary safeguards to deter misuse. USCIS’s actions demonstrate its ongoing commitment to maintaining the integrity and fairness of the U.S. naturalization process while guarding against vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

The decision to intensify scrutiny over the medical certification process reflects broader immigration enforcement trends. By targeting weaknesses in the system, such as fraudulent documentation and misleading medical claims, the agency is aligning its procedures with national priorities focused on lawful conduct and eligibility verification.

Overall, this policy aims to refine the naturalization application process by ensuring that disability waivers are granted only when justified by clearly documented and well-explained medical evidence. With the introduction of this guidance, USCIS is signaling a firm stance on preventing abuse of legal pathways to citizenship while remaining committed to upholding the rights of applicants with legitimate medical needs.

By doing so, the agency hopes to prevent further erosion of trust in the system and ensure that exemptions are based on factual and thoroughly verified claims. It serves as a reminder to both applicants and medical professionals that integrity and accuracy in documentation are not optional but essential to the process.

In conclusion, USCIS’s new policy guidance on Form N-648 marks a pivotal step in enhancing the oversight and reliability of medical disability certifications in the naturalization process. By tightening the requirements for documentation, addressing concerns about potential fraud, and supporting the current administration’s executive directives, the agency aims to protect both the credibility of the naturalization system and the rightful claims of individuals who genuinely qualify for such exceptions.

ITServe’s 5th Annual Capitol Hill Day Makes Huge Impact Through 145 Meetings with Key Lawmakers, Advocating for Policies and Programs that Help Maintain US Leadership in Technology

June 15, 2025June 17, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration, Technology 0

“I’m proud to be the original sponsor of the HIRE ACT, which is foundational,” Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthy, while addressing the nearly 200 ITServe Alliance members, who had come together on June 11^th, 2025 as part of their annual Capitol Hill Day to make their voices heard on the corridors of power. “It just updates the law. It doesn’t do anything revolutionary, but it does something necessary for our country, which is to make sure that we modernize our system in accordance with our needs, and plowing money into the STEM fields so that more indigenous talent rises, so that our children and others end up taking these jobs eventually, because we need to make sure that at the same time that we attract the best and the brightest from around the world to come here, that we also grow talent here. Am I right about that? That’s the only way that we compete. That’s the only way that we compete.”

ITServe Alliance leaders met with Rep. Jim Jordan, a Republican Congressman representing Ohio’s 4th District. The powerful Chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary expressed openness to the concerns shared by ITServe leadership. Rep. Tim Moore, representing North Carolina’s 14th District in the U.S. House, and a member of House Committees on Financial Services and the Budget, posted on his Facebook page: “ITServe Alliance visited to discuss education and building a skilled workforce in North Carolina.”

Sen. Eric Schmitt of Missouri, Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona, Rep. LaMonica McIver from New Jersey, and Rep. Robert Paul from Pennsylvania were among other key lawmakers that ITServe members met and advocated for immigration reforms.

ITServe Alliance, with an active membership of 2,500 + members who are small & medium-sized companies, representing prestigious IT companies functioning with similar interests across the United States, had its 5^th annual Capitol Hill Day in Washington, D.C., where they met with 145 US Representatives and Senators and their staff, including influential committee chairs and members from both the Parties, eliciting support for the causes put forth by ITServe.

High-Skilled Immigration Reform for Employment (HIRE) Act, introduced by US Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Illinois in the past and is being considered to be reintroduced in the current Congress, has been a key measure ITServe supports and has made aware of among the more than 145 key Lawmakers who were part of the Capitol Hill Day by ITServe this year. The Bill would strengthen U.S. competitiveness by helping to close the skills gap – the space between the skills required for jobs that employers need to fill, and the skills possessed by current prospective employees.

“The dedication of ITServe members, especially those 200 members who came from across the nation and participated in our 5^th annual Capitol Hill Day, and engaging in 145 meetings in a single day, is truly impressive,” said Anju Vallabhaneni, ITServe National President 2025. “The impact of these efforts on lawmakers is invaluable, and it’s inspiring to see such motivated teams working toward meaningful changes to the legal immigration system in the United States.”

Recognizing that H-1B visa holders play a critical role in bolstering the U.S. economy, fostering innovation, and enriching the fabric of American society through their skills, contributions, and diverse backgrounds, and knowledge to American workplaces, Siva Moopanar, President-Elect of ITServe said, “They facilitate knowledge transfer and skills development by engaging in research and development activities, particularly in STEM fields, which contributes to scientific advancements and technological progress. Therefore, ITServe Alliance continues its efforts in supporting and advocating for immigration reforms that will help America maintain its tech leadership in the world.”

ITServe supports the HIRE ACT Bill (High Skilled Immigration Reform for Employment). Innovation, STEM education, and avoiding brain drain are the highlights of the Bill. Another area, where ITServe has focused is the STEM Program to promote the “American Ingenuity Account” to fund State-administered grants for STEM education and worker training. Enhancing the current H1B CAP limits – from 65,000 to 130,000 per year has been a major area where ITServe has placed its efforts in recent years.

“The U.S. needs to maintain its leadership in technology and innovation,” Sateesh Nagilla, ITServe Alliance Director – Policy Advocacy Committee (PAC) & Immigration, said. “The U.S. has a large skills gap – availability of workers vs the openings for talent in IT. We need the brightest minds from all over the world to keep our wide lead in technology and innovation. To that end, ITServe Alliance, through its PAC teams, is consistently working to protect its members’ needs, advocating on Capitol Hill and with the US Administration.”

Sudheer Chakka, Managing Director, ITServe Alliance Connect Policy Advocacy Committee (CPAC) urged the lawmakers, among other initiatives, to support the Bill, “Through our annual Capitol Hill Day, ITServe has advocated and urged the Lawmakers to bring back this program[SM1] . We at ITServe are grateful that the US lawmakers, who have listened to our concerns and needs and have expressed their openness to support the HIRE ACT, benefitting tens of thousands of skilled workers in the nation.”

A major objective of the Capitol Hill Day is to showcase to the lawmakers some of the significant contributions of the ITServe members to the country’s economy through Technology & Innovation, local employment, and STEM education. The event addressed key concerns faced by small businesses, including the need for high-skilled immigration reform.

“The ITServe Alliance is consistently working to protect its members’ needs. To that end, ITServe Alliance, through its PAC teams, advocated on Capitol Hill and with the US Administration. Capitol Hill Day serves as a perfect platform to communicate our collective voice with key policymakers on important issues to our members,” added Amar Varada, ITServe Governing Board member.

“Congrats, ITServe, PAC, and CPAC leadership, and Monte for a very successful Capitol Hill Day. 145 meetings in one day is great work and could be accomplished only with highly motivated teams of ITServe members. Everyone was very appreciative of the impact the ITServe is creating on lawmakers and how it will make a difference in the long run,” said Vinay Mahajan, past President and current member of the ITServe Governing Board.

Stressing the importance of ITServe and the Legislative Day, Monte Ward, a key organizer of the day long events on Capitol Hill, said, “ITServe Alliance’s Capitol Hill Day has effectively served as a powerful platform in [SM2] advocating with policymakers on the issues that are important to our members and the business community, ensuring that our needs and views are reflected in policy debates and outcomes on Capitol Hill. The U.S. needs to maintain its leadership in technology and innovation.”

H-1Bs are temporary, nonimmigrant visas for foreign workers with at least a bachelor’s degree, and they often go to technology workers. Currently, the number of H-1B visas is limited to 65,000 each year, although there are an additional 20,000 available to workers who have a master’s degree or higher from a US university. Enhancing the current H1-B CAP limits – from 65,000 to 130,000 per year has been a major area where ITServe has placed its efforts.

H-1B visa holders, possessing specialized skills and expertise in fields like STEM, which are vital for American companies to stay competitive in the global market, are a highly skilled foreign workers that brings numerous benefits to the United States. They fill in critical skill gaps in the labor market, contributing to economic growth and innovation, thus leading to increased productivity and competitiveness in various industries, by creating new job opportunities by starting businesses and driving entrepreneurship.

Referring to a recent poll of people around the world, Rep. Krishnamoorthy said, while only 6% wanted to immigrate to China, 90% of the people wanted to immigrate to the United States. “Imagine a country that has the number one draft pick of the very bright, the brightest, and the most hard-working people from every other country in the world. And why would you ever squander that?” he asked.

Rep. Krishnamoorthy lauded the contributions of ITServe members to the nation. He said, “I look at you today. You chose Team America. You come here and bless this country with your gifts, with your talents, with your energy, with your ideas, with your industry, with your ability to make it happen. And that’s what you did. You made your company, you hired people, you created jobs. And that’s what you’re trying to do over and over and over again. You’re trying to replicate that success.”

ITServe Alliance, the largest association of IT Solutions & Services organizations in the US, serves as the collective voice for prestigious small and mid-sized IT firms with shared interests nationwide. As a trusted platform, ITServe collaborates and implements measures to safeguard common interests, ensuring the protection of its member companies. Since its establishment in 2010, ITServe Alliance has been a beacon of knowledge, skill, and awareness, empowering its members through 22 regional chapters across the country. For information on ITServe and its many noble initiatives, please visit: www.itserve.org

Youth Advocates Present Campaign Findings on Mental Health, Language Access, and Bullying in NYC Schools

June 15, 2025June 17, 2025 Staff ReporterYouth 0

Youth leaders from the Coalition for Asian American Children and Families’ (CACF) renowned Asian American Student Advocacy Project (ASAP) gathered to present the outcomes of their advocacy campaigns for the 2024–2026 cycle. These efforts focused on three major concerns impacting Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) students in New York City’s public schools—language access, mental health, and bullying and harassment. The results were unveiled at the program’s annual Community Briefing held on Friday.

ASAP, which marked its 21st year, was initiated in 2004 with a vision to empower young AAPI students across New York to become knowledgeable and self-aware advocates for their communities and peers. Since its inception, the program has become a powerful platform for elevating youth voices on critical issues within the city’s education system.

This year’s cohort comprised 36 young individuals representing diverse backgrounds from all five boroughs of New York City as well as neighboring regions. These youth leaders spent the year investigating the challenges AAPI students face and strategizing ways to bring about meaningful change.

“Our annual ASAP Community Briefing is a special moment for everyone at CACF because it is a chance for our young people to showcase their research and advocacy on the issues that affect them the most,” said CACF Co-Executive Directors Anita Gundanna and Vanessa Leung. “ASAP was built on the belief that our young people are experts on their own experiences and we are so pleased to be able to highlight the research they’ve done this academic year to their teachers, families, and elected officials.”

The event drew a wide audience that included community members, educators, and public officials. Among the attendees was Councilmember Rita Joseph, who delivered a brief address to the youth participants, acknowledging their contributions and commitment. In recognition of their efforts, the youth advocates received certificates of completion from CACF’s Co-Executive Directors.

Additionally, they were honored with City Council citations provided by Councilmembers Shekar Krishnan, Linda Lee, and Mercedes Narcisse. For those hailing from Brooklyn, the Brooklyn Borough President’s Office also extended its congratulations with official citations.

The ASAP Youth Leaders were chosen through a competitive application process and come from 22 different high schools across the city. This year’s group was among the most diverse in the program’s history, representing 15 different Asian ethnicities and collectively speaking 11 different languages.

Several of the youth leaders reflected on what the program and the Community Briefing meant to them personally. Their experiences revealed the depth of learning, collaboration, and emotional connection involved in the yearlong journey.

“This briefing is the conclusion to a long year of focusing on AAPI mental health, the different perspectives of the gaps and challenges that AAPI face in schools, and how we can put that all together and find solutions and patterns. I’ve learned so much from my team over this year, and the briefing as a whole is such a special place for all the teams to share work that they’re proud of and advocate for change to our schools and, especially as a high school senior, to the generations after us,” said Olivia Kim, an ASAP Youth Leader.

Emily Ng, also a high school senior and longtime participant, described the briefing as a significant personal milestone. “The ASAP briefing is special because it’s a unique opportunity to let others know what we do at ASAP and why it’s important. It’s a space where we get to educate and have meaningful conversations. For me personally, I’m also excited because this is my last ASAP briefing as a youth leader, and in a way, it’s like the ASAP graduation,” she shared.

The campaigns covered a range of timely issues that continue to impact AAPI students in public schools. For example, one of the teams focused on combating bullying and harassment—a subject that has gained national attention in recent years, especially in the context of rising anti-Asian hate.

“This year, my team have been working hard, having many discussions about anti-bullying and harassment, and how it affects AAPI students in NYC’s public schools. I am excited to finally be able to share what I have learned with other people and hope to educate people in and outside ASAP on issues of bullying and harassment in schools,” said Ari Schaer, another youth leader in the program.

Mental health was another central theme of the advocacy projects. Ayesha Tasnim, who participated on a team that explored the psychological well-being of students, explained the significance of the work her group had completed over the past academic year.

“Today’s briefing is special because it marks the end of the ASAP mental health campaign team for 2024–2025 and is a celebration of all of the progress that we’ve made. This briefing accumulates all the hard work that my team and I have done all school year on researching and understanding the mental health needs of AAPI and other students in New York City schools. I am excited about sharing our findings with the community,” she stated.

The sense of accomplishment and empowerment was echoed by several participants. For many, the briefing symbolized more than a presentation—it was a culmination of months of dedication, teamwork, and a shared desire to make schools more inclusive and supportive environments for all students.

“I’m excited for the briefing because us ASAPers work so hard during the year, and I think we all love the idea of showing off our efforts. It also gives me a sense of accomplishment and contribution because I get to share our campaign’s findings with the community,” said Jonas Wooh, one of the student leaders involved in the initiative.

The Community Briefing served as both a platform to celebrate youth-driven advocacy and an opportunity for broader engagement with city leaders and education stakeholders. Through the efforts of its young participants, ASAP continues to shed light on the unique challenges faced by AAPI students and promote solutions tailored to their lived realities.

With the 2024–2026 campaigns now formally presented, the findings will not only help shape future efforts within the program but may also influence broader policy conversations about equity, safety, and access in public education. The voices of these young advocates are expected to resonate long after the event, inspiring both peers and adults to rethink how schools can better support diverse student populations.

By equipping its participants with research tools, collaborative skills, and public speaking opportunities, CACF’s ASAP program continues to fulfill its mission of nurturing the next generation of community advocates and changemakers. As the 21st year of the initiative concludes, the passion and dedication displayed by this year’s youth leaders signal a promising future for student-led advocacy in New York City.

Israeli Airstrikes Target Iranian Nuclear Sites, Kill Top Officials, Prompting Fears of Escalation

June 13, 2025June 15, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

In a dramatic escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, Israel launched a series of airstrikes against Iran early Friday morning, local time, aimed at facilities it identified as being linked to Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The strikes have intensified global concern over the possibility of a wider regional war, especially as both countries exchanged threats and retaliatory actions.

According to Iranian state media, the Israeli assault resulted in the deaths of two of Iran’s most senior military leaders. Mohammad Hossein Bagheri, the highest-ranking official in Iran’s Armed Forces, was confirmed dead. He was killed alongside Hossein Salami, the commander-in-chief of Iran’s powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. These losses mark a severe blow to Iran’s military hierarchy.

In addition to these key figures, two of Iran’s leading nuclear scientists were also killed in the strikes. Iranian news outlets identified them as Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani and Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi. Both individuals played central roles in the country’s nuclear development program, and their deaths are expected to have a significant impact on Iran’s scientific and military infrastructure.

In response to the Israeli operation, Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, issued a stern warning, vowing retribution. “With this crime, the Zionist regime has brought a bitter and painful fate upon itself, and it will certainly face it,” Khamenei declared in an official statement.

The Israeli offensive reportedly included airstrikes in various parts of Iran. In the capital city of Tehran, multiple casualties were reported. The city of Natanz, which houses one of Iran’s primary nuclear enrichment facilities, was also struck. However, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Isfahan nuclear facility remained unharmed, and there was “no increase in radiation levels has been observed at the Natanz site.”

Other locations that came under fire included Khandab, home to a heavy water nuclear reactor, and Khoramabad, which hosts a base for ballistic missiles. The choice of these specific sites underlines the Israeli objective to disrupt what it sees as critical components of Iran’s nuclear and military capabilities.

In a swift response, Iran launched approximately 100 drones aimed at Israeli territory, an Israeli military spokesperson reported. The Israeli defense system is currently engaged in efforts to intercept and neutralize these drones. This exchange indicates the high likelihood of further military confrontation between the two nations.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed his nation following the strikes, making it clear that the operation could continue. “This operation will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat,” he asserted. His statement suggests a prolonged campaign may be underway.

Israel’s Defense Minister, Israel Katz, declared a state of emergency in the immediate aftermath of the strikes. He issued a dire warning, stating, “A missile and drone attack against the State of Israel and its civilian population is expected in the immediate future.” This announcement heightened public alert and underscored the seriousness of the situation.

Although the United States did not take part in the military operation, it was kept in the loop by Israeli officials. Secretary of State Marco Rubio revealed that U.S. President Donald Trump had been briefed in advance of the strike. Rubio explained, “Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense.”

Earlier in the week, Trump had authorized the withdrawal of some American personnel from the Middle East, acknowledging the volatility of the region. He stated that the area “could be a dangerous place,” and emphasized the U.S. preference for diplomacy over military action. Trump has long advocated for a negotiated agreement over Iran’s nuclear enrichment program rather than pursuing conflict.

Despite these diplomatic overtures, Iran has expressed dissatisfaction with Washington’s stance. Tehran accused the United States of failing to take the negotiations seriously and not respecting Iran’s right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.

On Friday morning, Trump made a pointed statement via social media, warning Iran of the military power at Israel’s disposal. “The United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come – And they know how to use it,” Trump wrote. In a more provocative tone, he added, “Certain Iranian hardliners spoke bravely, but they didn’t know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!”

The possibility of further escalation remains uncertain. Iran and Israel have a long history of animosity, and tensions between the two have surged since the October 2023 terror attack carried out in Israel by Hamas, a Palestinian group backed by Tehran. Israel has repeatedly accused Iran of orchestrating proxy conflicts through its support of militant groups like Hamas, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Late last year, both Iran and Israel exchanged direct missile strikes on each other’s territory, a rare occurrence that threatened to spiral into full-scale war but was ultimately contained. These previous flare-ups demonstrate just how close the region has come to the brink of wider conflict.

Reacting to the current crisis, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for de-escalation. He urged both nations to “show maximum restraint, avoiding at all costs a descent into deeper conflict, a situation that the region can hardly afford.” His plea reflects growing international anxiety over the potential for a broader war in an already volatile region.

Meanwhile, the economic impact of the conflict has been immediate. Global oil prices surged amid fears that a wider war could disrupt supply lines in the energy-rich Middle East. Investors, rattled by the news, rushed toward safe-haven assets. Gold prices soared to near two-month highs, while U.S. Treasury bond prices also rose as a sign of flight to safety.

At the same time, U.S. stock futures took a hit, reflecting concerns over geopolitical risk and economic stability. Dow Jones Industrial Average futures were down by 580 points, highlighting the market’s sensitivity to sudden escalations in global conflict zones.

The events of Friday morning represent one of the most significant confrontations between Israel and Iran in recent history. With key figures killed, nuclear sites targeted, and retaliatory strikes underway, the potential for continued violence remains high. The world is now watching closely to see whether either side will step back from the edge—or move further into confrontation.

Brazil Books World Cup Spot, Palestine’s Dream Ends in Heartbreak as 2026 Qualifying Intensifies

June 13, 2025June 15, 2025 Staff ReporterSports 0

Brazil have secured their place in the 2026 FIFA World Cup with a narrow 1-0 win over Paraguay, courtesy of a decisive goal by Vinicius Jr. The victory, celebrated by an enthusiastic crowd of 46,000 fans at the Corinthians Arena in São Paulo, marks another step forward for the five-time world champions. The match was also notable as one of the first major tests for Brazil’s new head coach, Carlo Ancelotti, who recently took over the reins of the national team.

Vinicius Jr, a key player for Real Madrid, scored just before half-time, sending the home crowd into a frenzy. The result confirmed Brazil’s qualification from the South American region, alongside fellow powerhouses Argentina and Ecuador. Brazil’s journey to the tournament now shifts from qualifying to preparation, as they aim to lift their sixth World Cup trophy.

While Brazil celebrated, another team experienced a bitter night in their own qualifying campaign. In a dramatic match held in Amman, Jordan, Palestine were on the verge of advancing to the fourth round of the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) qualifiers until they conceded a heartbreaking equalizer from the penalty spot in the dying seconds of the game against Oman.

Palestine had taken the lead at the end of the first half thanks to a goal by Oday Kharoub. They maintained their advantage until stoppage time, when a controversial penalty decision saw Oman’s Essam al-Subhi convert in the 97th minute. The 1-1 result ended Palestine’s hopes of moving forward in the AFC qualification process.

Palestine have been playing their matches at neutral venues due to the conflict in their homeland. Israel’s war on Gaza, its control and destruction of sports facilities and venues in Gaza and the occupied West Bank have left the players unable to travel and play at their home venue, the Faisal Al-Husseini International Stadium in ar-Ram, a town northeast of occupied Jerusalem. Matches have been relocated to Jordan, Kuwait, and Qatar to ensure the safety and participation of the Palestinian team.

Oman have now taken Palestine’s spot in the next round, joining other Asian teams that have successfully advanced. The emotional blow to Palestine highlights the often overlooked human and geopolitical challenges that intersect with international football.

Across the world, several other nations have already punched their tickets to the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Here’s a breakdown of which countries from each region have officially qualified so far:

From Asia, six teams have confirmed their spots: Iran, Uzbekistan, South Korea, Jordan, Australia, and Japan. In South America, the teams that have booked their places are Argentina, Brazil, and Ecuador. North, Central America, and the Caribbean have three automatic spots reserved for the host countries – Canada, Mexico, and the United States – all of whom have confirmed participation. In the Oceania region, New Zealand claimed their sole qualification slot by winning the third-round playoff final against New Caledonia on March 24.

However, no team from Africa or Europe has qualified yet. None of the 54 nations involved in the qualifiers has been able to confirm their spots as the first round of qualifying matches does not conclude until October 16. Europe is in a similar position, with its 54 competing teams having until November 18 to complete their initial qualification round.

As for those who will miss out, Chile, who famously finished third in the 1962 World Cup, have been eliminated. China, despite ambitious investments in domestic football development and having last played in a World Cup in 2002, also crashed out following a critical loss on June 5.

Several other teams still remain in contention, hoping to grab one of the remaining qualification spots.

In Asia, teams like Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Iraq, and Oman are still competing for two direct World Cup slots and one intercontinental playoff position.

From South America, the battle for qualification continues among Uruguay, Paraguay, Colombia, Venezuela, and Bolivia, who are all vying for the three remaining direct slots. Peru can no longer qualify directly but still has a chance via the intercontinental playoff.

In the North, Central American and Caribbean region, twelve teams – Honduras, Bermuda, Costa Rica, Trinidad and Tobago, Curaçao, Haiti, Panama, Nicaragua, Jamaica, Guatemala, Suriname, and El Salvador – have made it to the third round. Three of these teams will earn direct qualification, while the three runners-up from each group will compete for one intercontinental playoff spot.

New Caledonia, having lost out to New Zealand in the Oceania qualifiers, have qualified for the intercontinental playoffs and will look to secure a spot through that route.

The final list of the 48 teams that will take part in the 2026 FIFA World Cup won’t be confirmed until March 31, 2026. The European qualifiers will extend into March, and the intercontinental playoff final is also scheduled for the same month, leaving just under three months before the tournament begins to finalize the lineup.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup, which will be the first edition of the tournament to feature 48 teams, is scheduled to begin on June 11 in Mexico City. The final will take place on July 19 in New Jersey, United States. This extended format is set to bring in more nations than ever before and will be hosted across Canada, Mexico, and the United States.

As qualification heats up, the coming months promise intense action, heartbreak, and triumph as teams from around the world fight for their place on football’s biggest stage.

The American India Foundation Raises Record-Breaking $4.5 Million at Its Annual Gala in New York

June 13, 2025June 15, 2025 Ajay GhoshCommunity 0

The American India Foundation (AIF) hosted its annual New York City gala to an audience of nearly 700 guests at Cipriani Wall Street on June 10, raising a record-breaking $4.5 million to support its multidimensional interventions in public health, education, and livelihoods, benefiting over 21 million lives across 35 states and union territories since 2001.

The event honored the exceptional leadership and philanthropic endeavors of Roshni Nadar Malhotra, Chairperson of HCLTech, and Douglas Peterson, former President & CEO of S&P Global. This marquee gathering brought together changemakers, innovators, business leaders, and stalwarts from across the Indian diaspora to drive transformative social impact.

Hosted by the renowned comedian Zarna Garg and featuring a world-class menu curated by acclaimed Chef Gaurav Anand, the evening provided a full-sensory experience. Guests were given a front-row seat to AIF’s award-winning MANSI (Maternal and Newborn Survival Initiative) program through an interactive Virtual Reality experience.

Roshni Nadar Malhotra stated, “I am truly humbled to receive this recognition from AIF, an organization whose mission resonates strongly with my own. Whether it is empowering young leaders, safeguarding our planet, or expanding access to education, I believe that progress must be inclusive, and everyone deserves the opportunity to thrive.”

Douglas Peterson remarked, “My profound love for India spans decades and stems from my relationships with its people. I have witnessed firsthand how access to opportunity transforms lives. AIF’s partnership-driven model delivers that access with purpose and scale. Tonight serves as a steadfast reminder of what is achievable when collaboration catalyzes true change for millions.”

AIF’s CEO Nishant Pandey addressed the audience, stating, “Tonight is not simply about generosity; it is a collective act of belief in the power of partnership. AIF’s success is built on this very foundation: our partnerships with the Indian government at every level across the nation, collaborations with binational corporations, and connections between the civil societies of India and the U.S. Tonight’s record-breaking support not only funds programs but also highlights our collective dedication to Viksit Bharat as we reimagine what opportunity looks like.”

Ajay Banga, AIF’s Chairman Emeritus, graced the evening with his family to pay a heartfelt tribute to his longtime “mentor and inspiration,” Victor Menezes, AIF’s founder and only other Chairman Emeritus, who passed away earlier this year. The evening focused on AIF’s people—its donors, indefatigable team, and the millions of beneficiaries they serve.

During the pledge-drive that raised over $850,000, Bharat and Neerja Desai announced their gift of $1 million towards AIF’s educational initiatives, including DEEP Shaala in Amreli, Gujarat—a multi-year program with Desai’s Samvid Ventures to bridge the digital divide in middle and high school education.

This event was AIF’s highest-grossing gala in its 24-year history, thanks to the generosity of its donors, including leadership corporate sponsors EXL, Goldman Sachs Gives, HCLTech, Mastercard, and S&P Global. For a full list of our sponsors, please click here. Learn more at the American India Foundation. For queries in the US, please contact Kalpana Kanthan, Chief Development and Marketing Officer, at Kalpana.Kanthan@aif.org. AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION

Hosted once again by comedian, actress, author, and creator extraordinaire, Zarna Garg, guests experienced AIF’s mission firsthand through a moving VR journey into the public health program and powerful video stories from our beneficiaries and enjoyed a delectable menu by Chef Gaurav Anand.

The American India Foundation is a 501(c)(3) organization committed to improving the lives of India’s underprivileged, with a special focus on women, children, and youth.

H1B Visa Holders Face Bureaucratic Hurdles in Routine License Renewals in the U.S.

June 13, 2025June 15, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration 0

Even the most straightforward administrative procedures are becoming increasingly difficult for H1B visa holders living in the United States. A recent incident shared on social media highlights how even renewing a driver’s license can turn into a bureaucratic nightmare. The user recounted a frustrating experience at the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), where their attempt to extend their driver’s license was abruptly stalled due to a verification failure involving their immigration status.

Despite arriving fully prepared and submitting every required document—including a valid passport, vehicle registration papers, and an Employment Authorization Document (EAD)—the DMV officials were unable to proceed with the license renewal. The problem stemmed from the fact that the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) system failed to verify the user’s immigration status, causing a deadlock.

The situation escalated to the point where the manager of the DMV office had to intervene and initiate a SAVE (Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements) check, a process used to verify the immigration status of non-citizens applying for public benefits. This additional step, while ultimately necessary, prolonged the ordeal and reflected a growing pattern of procedural breakdowns that many immigrants are reporting.

This account is not an isolated case. Several other H1B visa holders have shared similar stories, suggesting that such complications are becoming alarmingly frequent. One H1B worker detailed how their experience took an even stranger turn. Despite holding a valid driver’s license for several years, they were unexpectedly instructed to retake a driving test. This demand came with no warning or justification and seemed disconnected from their previous driving record or renewal application.

While the agencies involved continued to shift blame, the visa holder’s license expired during the back-and-forth exchanges. The outcome was a stressful, confusing, and avoidable disruption in the life of a skilled professional who was simply trying to follow the rules.

For many Indian nationals living and working in the U.S. under the H1B visa program, these recurring issues are taking a toll. They find themselves caught in a system where compliance is expected but reciprocation in the form of smooth, functional public services is often lacking. “Every mundane government service is becoming a test of patience,” lamented one H1B professional, summarizing a sentiment felt widely across the community.

The core issue appears to lie in the gaps between different governmental departments and databases. When agencies like the DMV depend on immigration status verification from USCIS, any delay, error, or discrepancy can leave the applicant in limbo. While SAVE checks are intended to resolve such mismatches, they are not always initiated quickly, nor do they always deliver timely results. In the meantime, the lives of the applicants are put on hold.

H1B visa holders, many of whom are highly skilled professionals in sectors like technology, engineering, and healthcare, are growing increasingly frustrated by the way they are treated by public institutions. These are individuals contributing significantly to the U.S. economy, yet they find themselves facing unreasonable obstacles in accessing even the most basic services.

There is also a psychological burden associated with such encounters. The inability to drive legally due to a lapsed license can affect one’s job, family responsibilities, and general mobility. Moreover, being forced to undergo retesting or subjected to redundant verifications can feel demeaning, especially for those who have lived in the U.S. for years and maintained perfect compliance with immigration and civil rules.

One user who had to go through this ordeal voiced concern that “the system doesn’t always play fair in return,” highlighting a perceived imbalance between the responsibilities of H1B holders and the responsiveness of the institutions that serve them. These individuals are not just expected to follow the rules—they are also required to demonstrate that they are following them at every turn, even when the system itself is flawed or inconsistent.

In cases where licenses expire while USCIS and DMV officials argue over procedural responsibility, visa holders are left to suffer the consequences. This not only affects their legal ability to drive but can also trigger complications in employment, banking, and housing arrangements—areas that often require a valid state-issued ID.

What adds to the frustration is the lack of transparency in these bureaucratic processes. When a SAVE check is initiated, the applicant may not receive clear communication about when the check will be completed or what information is missing. This vagueness makes it hard to plan next steps or seek redress, especially for those who cannot afford prolonged gaps in their documentation.

Further compounding the issue is the lack of standardized training among DMV personnel in handling immigration-related verifications. Many frontline employees at local DMV branches may not fully understand the complexities of visa documentation, leading to misinterpretations and delays. In such scenarios, applicants are often required to escalate their cases to supervisors or wait for specialized staff to step in, further slowing down the process.

These incidents also underscore the pressing need for better integration and coordination between federal immigration authorities and state-level service departments. When systems do not talk to each other effectively, it is the applicants—law-abiding, tax-paying immigrants—who are left to deal with the fallout. Even small fixes, such as automated alerts for expiring visas or shared access to valid status data, could go a long way in minimizing disruption.

Until such improvements are made, the H1B community will continue to be at the mercy of outdated systems and unclear procedures. “We’re expected to be perfect in our paperwork, timelines, and compliance,” said another affected professional, “but the same precision doesn’t exist on the other side.”

The broader implication of these incidents is a potential deterrent to future talent considering a move to the U.S. If the daily logistics of life—like renewing a license—become this difficult, it could influence skilled workers to look elsewhere for better support and respect. In a global economy where talent is mobile, a clunky public system can end up being a significant liability.

In the end, while the rules and regulations may be designed with structure and accountability in mind, their real-world execution reveals deep flaws. For now, the message from many H1B visa holders is simple: they’re trying to play by the rules. They just wish the system would, too.

USCIS Tightens Green Card Medical Exam Rules Amid Public Health Concerns

June 13, 2025June 15, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration 0

The Trump administration has swiftly implemented changes to the green card application process, announcing on Wednesday that all new applicants must now submit an up-to-date medical examination form. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) declared that its earlier policy—allowing indefinite use of the medical exam form—posed potential risks to public health and will no longer be valid.

Previously, immigrants applying for permanent residency were permitted to reuse an I-693 medical form that had been signed by a certified civil surgeon, even after long intervals. However, under the new rule, effective June 11, 2025, that flexibility has been eliminated. Every new green card application must now be accompanied by a freshly signed medical report, regardless of whether a similar form had been used in a prior, withdrawn, or denied application.

The change could significantly affect individuals currently seeking adjustment of status, who until now had a deadline of June 10 to submit forms signed under the old guidelines. These abrupt changes offer little to no time for applicants or their legal representatives to adjust, a departure from previous USCIS practice, which typically allowed a grace period for transitioning to new policies.

The medical examination form in question, known as the I-693 or “Report of Immigration Medical Examination and Vaccination Record,” is a key part of the green card application process. It is designed to identify health-related grounds of inadmissibility to the U.S., such as infectious diseases or missing vaccinations. While these forms were previously valid indefinitely if signed after November 1, 2023, the new directive revokes that policy.

Under the revised guidelines, once an application is withdrawn, any corresponding I-693 form becomes invalid. This forces the applicant to undergo a new medical exam and secure a freshly signed form. This change is expected to affect thousands of immigrants who are in the midst of preparing their Form I-485, which is used to apply for lawful permanent resident status.

“This is pretty typical of the kind of changes we’ve been seeing. Time was that they would at least give you some grace period, some lead up, but this means that things that were in the mail this week are going to be invalid potentially,” said Matt Cameron, an immigration attorney with the law firm Cameron Micheroni and Silvia in Boston, in an interview with Newsweek.

The implications of this shift are not only procedural but also financial. Immigration medical exams, which include general physical assessments, vaccination record verification, and disease screening, generally cost between $100 and $500. Cameron highlighted the concern that applicants could end up paying for the process multiple times. With the new rule, every new filing will necessitate another round of testing, which could place additional financial burdens on immigrants.

Before December 2024, filing the I-693 was a requirement only for applicants who needed to show they were not inadmissible on medical grounds. Now, every applicant for a green card must file this form, and even those applying for other types of visas might be required to do so, at USCIS’s discretion.

This regulatory tightening reflects a broader trend under the Trump administration, which has intensified its scrutiny of both temporary and permanent visa applicants. These efforts align with the administration’s goal of cracking down on perceived abuses of the immigration system.

A similar abrupt change in March caused considerable confusion among applicants. A wave of modifications to several immigration forms at that time prompted a lawsuit from immigration attorneys, who argued that the changes were too sudden and left applicants unprepared. In response, USCIS had to provide a two-week buffer before implementing those modifications.

The new rules come amid a more aggressive stance by the Trump administration on immigration enforcement, which includes taking actions even against green card holders. In one prominent case from March, federal agents detained Mahmoud Khalil, a green card holder, Columbia University graduate, and participant in pro-Palestinian protests. Although he held lawful permanent resident status, the administration argued that his actions contradicted U.S. foreign policy and pursued his removal from the country.

Instances like Khalil’s, where green card holders have been detained domestically or refused entry upon returning from international travel, are becoming more common. While not entirely new, these occurrences were rare prior to the administration’s more hardline stance following January 20.

The federal government continues to emphasize that a green card does not equate to U.S. citizenship and can be revoked for a range of reasons, including violations of immigration law, criminal activity, or national security concerns.

Commenting further on the recent policy change, Matt Cameron told Newsweek, “They usually would give this until the end of the month or something, so the applications that are just about to be filed can be honored. It’s not a radical change, but I think it’s very much of a piece of the trend here in just making everything more difficult. Across the board [they] have made every kind of contact with the immigration system more difficult.”

Elissa Taub, an immigration attorney at Siskind Susser in Houston, Texas, also offered her perspective. “Previously, I-693s all had an expiration date, so we had clients needing to get multiple exams done while their I-485s were pending over many years due to backlogs,” she said.

“Currently, I-693s don’t expire, and it sounds like they are clarifying that if you withdraw that application or it’s denied, you can’t reuse the same unexpired I-693 with a new application. I don’t think this is too earth-shattering, and I’m happy that this policy change is relatively narrow and that they didn’t decide to create a new pre-filing expiration period,” Taub added.

USCIS explained its rationale in a statement accompanying the new directive: “We have since determined that the April 4, 2024, policy is overly broad and could potentially threaten public health in the United States. By limiting the validity period to only the current immigration benefit application or request, we ensure that aliens get timely and proper medical examinations and treatment, which safeguards public health.”

While the latest update may seem like a technical adjustment, it carries significant implications for applicants navigating an already complex and often costly immigration system. The decision underscores the Trump administration’s consistent approach: increasing the stringency of immigration processes under the premise of safeguarding national interests.

British Man Miraculously Survives Air India Crash That Killed Over 200

June 12, 2025June 13, 2025 Staff ReporterIndia, Travel 0

AHMEDABAD, INDIA — In a devastating air disaster that claimed the lives of over 200 people, a British man has emerged as the sole survivor of an Air India flight that crashed shortly after takeoff in Ahmedabad on Tuesday.

Vishwashkumar Ramesh, a UK resident originally from India, was seated in 11A on the Boeing 787-8 bound for London Gatwick when the aircraft crashed less than a minute after lifting off from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport. The cause of the crash remains unknown.

Ramesh, covered in blood and visibly dazed, was seen walking toward an ambulance as smoke billowed from the wreckage in videos shared on social media. He is currently receiving treatment at a local hospital, where he was later visited by Indian Home Minister Amit Shah.

Speaking to the BBC, his brother Nayan Kumar Ramesh said the family was in shock: “He has no idea how he survived, how he got out of the plane. When he called us, he was just worried about my other brother, Ajay, who was also onboard. That’s all he cared about.”

A relative, identified only as Jay, told the PA News Agency that Ramesh suffered facial injuries but is expected to recover: “He was painted in blood. It’s a big shock, but he’s doing well.”

Ahmedabad Police Commissioner GS Malik confirmed that one survivor, seated in 11A, had been found alive and transported to the hospital. “The police found one survivor in seat 11A. He is under treatment,” Malik told ANI news agency.

Air India reported there were 230 people on board, including 169 Indian nationals, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese citizens, and one Canadian. The flight, numbered AI171, departed at 1:39 p.m. local time and was scheduled to arrive at London Gatwick at 6:25 p.m. BST.

The crash, which occurred when the aircraft plunged into a residential complex used by hospital staff near the airport, resulted in the recovery of 204 bodies so far. Additionally, 41 individuals on the ground sustained injuries.

Among the British victims believed to have perished are Akeel Nanabawa, his wife Hannaa Vorajee, and their daughter Sara, as confirmed by the Gloucester Muslim Society. Also feared dead are London-based couple Fiongal and Jamie Greenlaw-Meek, co-founders of the Wellness Foundry, who had posted a video to Instagram joking about their return flight just hours earlier.

In Blackburn, 72-year-old Adam Taju, his wife Hasina (70), and their son-in-law Altafhusen Patel (51) were also onboard. Their family remains hopeful, with granddaughter Ammaarah Taju saying, “We’re clinging onto hope.”

The tragedy has sparked condolences from leaders across the world. Britain’s King Charles expressed deep sorrow, saying he and Queen Camilla were “desperately shocked” by the tragedy. “Our special prayers and deepest possible sympathy are with the families and friends of all those affected across so many nations,” read the royal statement.

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer called the incident “awful news,” adding that the government was still working to verify reports. UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said crisis response teams have been deployed in both the UK and India.

London Gatwick Airport confirmed the establishment of a reception center for relatives of passengers and urged concerned British citizens to contact the Foreign Office helpline at 0207 008 5000.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi called the crash “heart-breaking beyond words,” and pledged full support for the investigation and victims’ families.

As investigations into the cause of the crash continue, questions remain about what went wrong just moments after takeoff. A video verified by the BBC shows the aircraft descending rapidly before erupting into a massive explosion on impact.

This incident marks one of the deadliest aviation disasters in recent Indian history, with the lone survival of Vishwashkumar Ramesh offering a glimmer of hope amid profound tragedy.

Global Confidence in U.S. Declines Sharply Amid Trump’s Return to Power

June 12, 2025June 13, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

The global perception of the United States has taken a significant hit since Donald Trump returned to the presidency, according to a new survey released by the Pew Research Center on June 11. The study highlights a widespread decline in approval for both Trump personally and his policy decisions across numerous countries. Out of the 24 nations surveyed, 15 reported a notable drop in their overall view of the United States.

Trump received his harshest criticism from Mexico, a nation he has frequently criticized and pressured on immigration matters. A staggering 91 percent of Mexicans expressed little or no confidence in Trump to act appropriately in global affairs. This deep skepticism was reflected in the overall image of the United States in Mexico, where public opinion has shifted significantly in a negative direction.

Canada, the United States’ northern neighbor, also exhibited a similar change in perception. Last year, during President Joe Biden’s administration, both Canadians and Mexicans generally held favorable views of the United States. However, that sentiment has reversed sharply with Trump’s return. Trump had previously made provocative comments suggesting that Canada should become the 51st U.S. state, which likely contributed to the souring of public sentiment.

The survey results showed a deteriorating view of the U.S. not only in North America but also across much of Europe. In Poland, an important ally of Ukraine and a country previously supportive of U.S. efforts, opinions of the United States have worsened considerably. This shift comes as Trump has scaled back support for Ukraine and indicated a preference for negotiating with Russia instead of confronting it.

Sweden, a country that joined NATO during Biden’s tenure in response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, gave the United States the most unfavorable rating among all surveyed countries. Seventy-nine percent of Swedes reported a negative view of the U.S., signaling a dramatic erosion of trust and approval.

When evaluating Trump’s global policies, the survey uncovered widespread disagreement across key issues. Majorities in every country surveyed opposed Trump’s approaches to immigration, climate change, the conflict in Gaza, and the war in Ukraine. Furthermore, personal views of Trump were largely negative. A dominant 80 percent of respondents described him as arrogant, while only 28 percent considered him to be honest.

Still, the Pew Research Center noted that Trump’s current global image is not as dire as it was during his first term in office. In 2017, when Trump succeeded the highly popular Barack Obama, international opinion of him was at its lowest. Although he remains an unpopular figure worldwide, some nations have shown slightly improved views compared to his initial presidency.

One country that stands out in the survey is Israel, which continues to have a very favorable opinion of the United States. Eighty-three percent of Israelis view the U.S. positively, a figure that has even risen slightly under Trump’s current leadership. Israel has benefited from strong U.S. support during the conflict in Gaza, likely contributing to this favorable assessment.

In Africa, Nigeria and Kenya maintained their historically positive opinions of the United States, regardless of who holds the presidency. In India, sentiment toward the U.S. also remained relatively stable, with over half of the population continuing to see the country in a positive light.

Since his return, Trump has embarked on an ambitious and sweeping presidential agenda. He has drastically cut foreign aid and taken aggressive action on deportations. These moves, while aligned with his core supporters, have not done much to improve his standing on the international stage.

Janell Fetterolf, a senior researcher at the Pew Research Center, pointed out that Trump’s standing on economic issues globally is not significantly different from Biden’s. “The past decade has also seen the growing normalization of right-wing populists,” she explained. This normalization may explain why Trump’s negative ratings, though substantial, are not as extreme as during his first term.

The case of Brazil illustrates this trend. There, Trump’s approval has improved from 14 percent during his first term to 34 percent now. Brazil was governed by Jair Bolsonaro, a political ally of Trump, from 2019 to 2022. Although Trump’s support in Brazil remains low, the uptick indicates a broader shift in political attitudes.

The survey also shed light on demographic patterns in Trump’s global support. Generally, men viewed Trump more favorably than women, and individuals with right-wing political leanings expressed more positive opinions of him. However, the data also revealed boundaries to Trump’s influence abroad.

Even among supporters of far-right nationalist parties in countries like Sweden and France, Trump struggled to gain majority support. While these groups were more sympathetic to him than the general public, confidence in Trump still fell short of a majority.

Conducted between January and April, the annual Pew survey involved 28,333 adults across 24 countries. The research offers a sobering picture of the United States’ global reputation under Trump’s leadership and underscores the challenges his administration faces in repairing diplomatic relationships and restoring international trust.

Despite modest improvements in some regions and a less severe perception compared to 2017, Trump’s second term appears to have reignited concerns across much of the world about the direction of U.S. leadership and foreign policy. The study shows a persistent gap between Trump’s actions and global expectations, with many foreign populations remaining wary of his intentions and capabilities.

With issues like climate change, global migration, and geopolitical conflict dominating headlines, the survey’s findings indicate that Trump’s positions continue to isolate the United States from many of its traditional allies and global partners. As his presidency progresses, the administration’s ability to address these concerns may play a decisive role in determining whether U.S. favorability can rebound on the world stage.

In sum, while Trump’s current international image is not quite as low as it was during his first term, the decline in global confidence in both him and the United States is clear. This shift signals the continued influence of his policies and rhetoric on the country’s international standing, potentially shaping the geopolitical landscape for years to come.

Indian Genius: Capturing the Meteoric Rise of Indian-Americans in One Frame

June 12, 2025June 13, 2025 Staff ReporterProfiles 0

A single image on the cover of Meenakshi Ahamed’s new book, Indian Genius, speaks volumes about the Indian-American journey. It features 16 iconic figures, side by side like a class photo, capturing a legacy of excellence. In that one photograph are prominent names like Kanwal Rekhi, Vinod Khosla, Shantanu Narayen, Satya Nadella, Suhas Patil, Nikesh Arora, Dr. Deepak Chopra, Chandrika Tandon, Fareed Zakaria, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Congressman Ro Khanna, Nikki Haley, Neal Katyal, and renowned doctors and writers Abraham Verghese, Siddhartha Mukherjee, and Atul Gawande.

What links all of them? They or their parents were born in India—some in rural villages, some in big cities. Decades ago, they left the subcontinent behind and journeyed across mountains and rivers toward their new destination: America. These names are deeply embedded in the narrative of Indian-American excellence and stand as symbols of power, strength, and promise.

Ahamed, who is also the author of A Matter of Trust: India-US Relations from Truman to Trump, takes a more intimate approach with Indian Genius, exploring the rise of Indians in the U.S. through the personal and professional journeys of 16 individuals. Born in Calcutta, Ahamed first came to the U.S. as a student and later worked with institutions like the World Bank and NDTV. Like many others, she belonged to the so-called “$8 Club” of immigrants who arrived in America with only a few dollars and a dream.

Rather than make her book a list of high earners, Ahamed focused on impact. “I wanted to see whether someone had an impact in the community on their way up,” she said. She chose three spheres where Indian-Americans have been particularly influential: technology, medicine, and public policy. In each category, she focused on five figures, presenting their stories in rich detail.

Her own experience gave her a unique lens. She held on to her Indian passport for years before choosing to stay in the U.S. and embrace American citizenship. That transition offered her insight into what makes Indians succeed. “When you live in a country of 1.5 billion people, competition is ingrained in you,” she said. “You’re competing for everything from day one.”

That competitive edge is evident in the story of Kanwal Rekhi, who grew up in poverty and eventually became what Ahamed calls the “godfather” of the Indian tech community in Silicon Valley. His company, Excelan, became the first Indian-American-owned firm to go public on Nasdaq in 1987. Rekhi once noted, “Indians in the Valley did not look at Bill Gates and imagine they could become him, but when they saw me, another Indian, run a company and go public with it, it inspired them. They felt, ‘If he can do it, why not me?’”

Yet even Rekhi made missteps. As a new immigrant, he turned down a job at IBM—then the leader in computing—and was later blacklisted for refusing the offer without a strong reason. But he went on to co-found The Indus Entrepreneurs (TiE), which now has 61 chapters across 14 countries.

The idea of jugaad—Indian ingenuity—runs deep in many of the stories. Suhas Patil of Cirrus Logic showed inventive talent as a boy, crafting projects from scrap. He credited a high school realization that “electronics had legs” with his decision to pursue engineering, eventually gaining a scholarship to MIT based on his IIT thesis.

Ahamed highlights the role of India’s top educational institutions. Vinod Khosla, another IIT alumnus, described how getting in “was the only way to escape whatever was your lot in society,” emphasizing the meritocracy and performance-based admission. “Your community determines how you develop,” he said, adding that IIT becomes “a brand of excellence that you are associated with.”

These pioneers—Rekhi, Khosla, Patil—were part of the early wave of Indian tech leaders in the U.S. “Smarts are not enough,” Khosla explained. “You had to have a risk-taking entrepreneurial culture to leave the comfort of home and come to this country not knowing anybody… Silicon Valley is about performance and it’s not just a place; it’s a mindset.”

He also stated, “I was never coming here to just get a job. What makes me happy are the things I’ve pursued. It’s this internal drive to do things that motivates me, not what others expect of me.”

Transformational leadership is another recurring theme. Satya Nadella and Shantanu Narayen receive high praise from Ahamed for reshaping Microsoft and Adobe with future-oriented strategies rooted in AI. “They stand out as truly visionary CEOs,” she wrote.

In medicine, figures like Dr. Atul Gawande have shifted paradigms. His book The Checklist Manifesto led to a 60% drop in hospital infections, and his later work, Being Mortal, questioned the medical obsession with prolonging life. “You have to weigh prolonged life against what the patient wants,” Ahamed noted, advocating hospice as a humane alternative.

Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee and Dr. Abraham Verghese also brought about major changes, from cancer care to AIDS-era medicine. “There’s something called Jugaad in India… being able to create something out of nothing – and leaving things better than they found them,” Ahamed said.

Chandrika Tandon’s journey from engineering school to McKinsey partner to Grammy-nominated musician exemplifies this spirit. She famously interviewed at McKinsey in a sari and chappals. “When you don’t look at boundaries, everything seems connected. Everything seems possible,” she said.

Ahamed’s book also looks at the broader impact of thought leaders like Deepak Chopra and Fareed Zakaria. Chopra popularized yoga in America, and Zakaria reshaped global news commentary. “All of a sudden, everyone from Dubai to Delhi to Des Moines, Iowa were listening to him,” Ahamed noted.

While spelling bee winners like Indian-American children demonstrate discipline and drive, Ahamed distinguishes that from genius. “Winning spelling bees led them to perfectly respectable careers but does not lead to becoming CEO of Microsoft,” she observed.

As for the future of Indian-American success, Ahamed remains cautiously optimistic despite immigration restrictions. “There’s always room for excellence, no matter where you are,” she said. “If you have really remarkable abilities and you’re smart and you have something that society wants, there are always going to be avenues to succeed.”

She adds that America’s strength lies in its immigrant roots. “Every wave of immigrants has contributed to this country and Indians are the most recent. We all, every one of us and our ancestors, have contributed towards the American story – so we should be celebrating that.”

Senate Republicans Divided Over Trump Agenda Spending Amid Musk Criticism and Deficit Concerns

June 12, 2025June 13, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

Senate Republicans are wrestling with major internal divisions over how to reduce the cost of a House-approved bill that aims to advance President Donald Trump’s legislative agenda. The legislation, which has been slammed by billionaire Elon Musk as a “mountain of disgusting pork,” has drawn widespread criticism from fiscal conservatives for failing to make meaningful cuts to the federal deficit.

Responding to nervous investors in the bond market and Musk’s pointed remarks, Republican lawmakers are now exploring previously untouched areas of the federal budget—including Medicare, defense, and the Federal Reserve—for potential savings. Just weeks ago, these areas were considered politically untouchable.

However, every new idea seems to be generating new controversy within the party.

Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri has taken a firm stance against any reductions to Medicare spending, even though proponents argue the cuts would be limited to curbing “waste, fraud and abuse.” Expressing his reservations, Hawley stated, “I don’t like this idea of fiddling with Medicare at all. I think it’s a bad idea. We should not do that. I’ve counseled against it.”

Hawley suggested a different route for saving money, asking, “How about instead we cap the price [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] is paying for prescription drugs? Why touch Medicare?”

Other GOP members are turning their attention to Medicare Advantage, the program that allows private insurers to provide Medicare benefits. Some senators believe the program is being exploited by questionable health care providers and is costing the federal government unnecessarily.

Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas highlighted a proposal by Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana that targets overbilling by insurance companies participating in Medicare Advantage. This measure could save as much as $275 billion. “No one is more concerned about our national debt than I am. I would like to cut more money on this bill. If it was up to me, we would be going from $7 trillion a year to $6.5 trillion,” Marshall said, aiming for a $500 billion reduction over the next ten years.

Another contentious proposal involves trimming defense spending. Though the House version of the bill includes $150 billion in new funds for the Pentagon—primarily for projects like Trump’s proposed “Golden Dome” missile defense system—many conservatives argue that the defense budget is bloated and needs downsizing.

Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky has been particularly vocal, accusing pro-defense colleagues of using Trump’s bill as a vehicle for excessive military expenditures. “It’s a frustration for those of us who think it ought to be about fiscal restraint and/or cutting taxes, or both. It ends up becoming a spending bill, and the spending is $150 billion on top of [what] they were already increasing the military” in regular appropriations, Paul said.

“If you’re fiscally conservative, you have to be fiscally conservative everywhere. You can’t be for blowing the budget out on the military,” Paul argued.

Marshall echoed this view, remarking, “I’m one of the few Republicans that thinks that defense has more than enough money.”

Nonetheless, any suggestion to cut the Pentagon’s budget is likely to meet resistance from powerful Senate figures. Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker of Mississippi and Defense Appropriations Chair Mitch McConnell of Kentucky have both insisted that Trump’s proposed military budget is insufficient. Earlier this year, Wicker pushed for $175 billion in new defense funds but later accepted the lower $150 billion figure as the bare minimum.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is expected to face intense scrutiny from McConnell on Trump’s defense budget request in the coming days.

Meanwhile, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas has offered a highly ambitious plan: halting interest payments to banks for deposits held at the Federal Reserve. Cruz argues this would save the federal government $1 trillion over the next decade. However, the banking industry is already pushing back hard. According to Bloomberg News, strategists at JPMorgan Chase & Co. warn that ending these payments would destabilize financial markets, casting serious doubt on the feasibility of Cruz’s proposal.

Some of the most controversial cuts in the House-passed bill—nearly $800 billion in Medicaid spending and $267 billion in reductions to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)—have hit roadblocks in the Senate. Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Jerry Moran of Kansas have all raised concerns about the social impact of such reductions.

In addition, several senators are pushing back against provisions in the bill that would immediately end renewable energy tax credits. These tax breaks are seen as vital for clean energy investments in Republican-leaning states like West Virginia. If construction on certain projects—such as the Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub—doesn’t start before year’s end, those investments could be lost.

Senators Thom Tillis of North Carolina, John Curtis of Utah, and Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia have all warned that abruptly ending the clean energy tax incentives could hurt their local economies and result in job losses.

On the other side of the debate, fiscal conservatives like Senator Mike Lee of Utah argue that the bill doesn’t go far enough—especially when it comes to denying federal benefits to undocumented immigrants. Lee told The Hill, “We’re talking about Medicaid, we’re talking about EITC, earned income tax credit, child tax credit, and eligibility for claiming the benefits of dependents for income tax purposes. Those things should be benefits available to citizens and lawful permanent residents and not others, not illegal migrants.”

Lee insists the legislation fails to completely bar undocumented migrants from receiving federal benefits and declared, “That’s the problem.”

Senator Rick Scott of Florida is also demanding swift action to eliminate clean energy tax subsidies that were part of President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. “We got a fiscal crisis,” Scott said. “We have to balance our budget.”

He added, “We should completely eliminate the Green New Deal, that’s No. 1.”

In the end, Senate Republicans are grappling with competing priorities. Some are focused on deficit reduction through sweeping cuts, while others are trying to protect politically sensitive programs that affect their constituents. With criticism from influential figures like Elon Musk and growing pressure from conservative voters, the GOP faces a delicate balancing act as they attempt to reshape Trump’s legislative blueprint into something fiscally palatable and politically feasible.

Greta Thunberg Deported by Israel After Gaza-Bound Aid Mission

June 12, 2025June 13, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

Greta Thunberg was deported from Israel on Tuesday, just one day after Israeli forces intercepted and seized the Gaza-bound vessel she was aboard. The climate activist was traveling with a group of international campaigners on a humanitarian mission to deliver aid to Gaza, a territory facing severe shortages due to a prolonged conflict and blockade.

After her deportation, Thunberg arrived in Paris as she made her way back to Sweden. Speaking to reporters, she called for the release of the other activists who remained in detention. Reflecting on her time in custody, she described it as a “quite chaotic and uncertain” experience. However, she emphasized that what she endured was minor in comparison to the suffering of the Palestinian people. “The conditions they faced are absolutely nothing compared to what people are going through in Palestine and especially Gaza right now,” she stated.

The journey, organized by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, aimed to challenge Israeli restrictions on humanitarian aid entering Gaza. Over 2 million people reside in the territory, many of whom rely almost entirely on external aid for survival. According to the group, the mission was intended to protest Israel’s control over aid delivery following a 20-month war in Gaza. Thunberg remarked, “We were well aware of the risks of this mission. The aim was to get to Gaza and to be able to distribute the aid.” She confirmed that despite the setback, the activists remained committed to delivering aid to Gaza in the future.

On Monday, U.S. President Donald Trump criticized Thunberg, calling her “a young angry person” and suggesting she enroll in anger management classes. In response, Thunberg remarked, “I think the world need a lot more young angry women.”

Still recovering from the ordeal, Thunberg mentioned she was unsure of her exact itinerary, had not used a phone in several days, and was eager for a shower. She explained that the activists were detained in separate facilities, and many faced difficulties in securing legal representation. When asked why she accepted deportation, she responded, “Why would I want to stay in an Israeli prison more than necessary?”

Thunberg urged her supporters to take action by pressuring their governments to push not only for unrestricted humanitarian access to Gaza but also for a broader political resolution. She said, “Ask your governments to demand not only humanitarian aid being let into Gaza but most importantly an end to the occupation and an end to the systemic oppression and violence that Palestinians are facing on an everyday basis.” She added that recognition of Palestine by other nations is “the very, very, very minimum” they could do.

Thunberg had been one of 12 individuals on board the Madleen when it was intercepted by the Israeli navy about 200 kilometers (125 miles) off the Gaza coast on Monday. Israeli authorities stated that the ship was seized peacefully. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition and allied human rights organizations have condemned the operation as a breach of international law, since it occurred in international waters. However, Israel rejected these allegations, arguing that the naval blockade on Gaza is lawful and that the intercepted vessel sought to violate it.

Israeli officials dismissed the mission as more symbolic than practical, referring to the Madleen as a “selfie yacht” and claiming its aid cargo was “meager,” amounting to less than a single truckload.

According to the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, three activists, including Thunberg, and a journalist were deported. The group stated it had advised some individuals to accept deportation so they could speak freely about what they had experienced. “Their detention is unlawful, politically motivated and a direct violation of international law,” the coalition said in a statement. Eight others who refused deportation remained in custody at Givon Prison in Ramle. Their legal cases were heard on Tuesday by Israeli authorities at a detention tribunal.

Lubna Tuma, an attorney with the legal rights organization Adalah, represented the detained activists. She said, “We argued today, and that also was emphasized by all the activists, that their goal is to enter humanitarian aid to Gaza, to end the famine and to end a genocide in Gaza. Any violation or any prohibition to entering the humanitarian aid to Gaza is deepening the complicity of Israel in the famine in Gaza.”

Tuma and other legal representatives pointed out that since the activists were captured in international waters and brought into Israel by force, the Israeli authorities had no legitimate legal grounds to detain or deport them.

Sabine Haddad, spokesperson for Israel’s Interior Ministry, explained that those who were deported on Tuesday had chosen to waive their right to a judicial hearing. The remaining detainees are scheduled to appear before a judge and will be held for up to 96 hours before further decisions are made regarding their deportation.

One of the detained passengers was Rima Hassan, a member of the European Parliament from France who is of Palestinian descent. Hassan had previously been barred from entering Israel due to her public criticism of its policies toward Palestinians. It was not immediately clear whether she was being deported or remained in custody.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot confirmed that one of the French nationals involved signed a deportation agreement and would be returning home Tuesday. The remaining five French activists had refused to sign, though all had received consular assistance.

In Barcelona, Spanish activist Sergio Toribio expressed outrage at the treatment he and the others received. “It is unforgivable, it is a violation of our rights. It is a pirate attack in international waters,” he told reporters upon his return.

The broader backdrop of this incident is the ongoing blockade of Gaza. Since Hamas seized control of Gaza from rival Palestinian factions in 2007, both Israel and Egypt have enforced varying degrees of blockade. Israel defends its measures as necessary to prevent Hamas from importing weapons, while critics argue that the blockade effectively punishes Gaza’s civilian population collectively.

The current war in Gaza, ongoing for 20 months, has seen Israel restrict and at times completely block aid supplies such as food, fuel, and medicine. Humanitarian experts claim these policies are driving the region toward famine. Israel, on the other hand, accuses Hamas of diverting aid for its own use.

The conflict escalated dramatically after an October 7, 2023, assault by Hamas-led militants that left about 1,200 people dead, most of them civilians, and resulted in the capture of 251 hostages. While many hostages have since been freed in ceasefire agreements or prisoner swaps, Hamas still holds 55 individuals, more than half of whom are believed to have died.

Israel’s retaliatory military campaign has resulted in over 54,000 Palestinian deaths, according to figures from the Gaza Health Ministry. While the ministry does not differentiate between combatants and civilians, it reports that most of the casualties are women and children. In addition to the staggering death toll, vast areas of Gaza have been destroyed and approximately 90% of the territory’s residents have been displaced.

TheUNN Corporation

CONTACT US

Follow us

Subscribe to Newsletter