India Wins Oval Thriller, Series Drawn Against England in Cricket

India clinched a thrilling victory by six runs in the fifth Test against England, with Mohammed Siraj playing a pivotal role by securing nine wickets, including five in the second innings.

India emerged victorious in a nail-biting finish against England in the fifth Test, underscored by a remarkable performance from fast bowler Mohammed Siraj. Siraj, who took a total of nine wickets in the match, was instrumental on the final day, particularly with five dismissals in the second innings, helping India defeat England by six runs.

The match, which concluded dramatically, commenced on the fifth day with India playing aggressively. Siraj and his teammate Prasidh Krishna struck early to keep the game finely balanced. Ultimately, it was Siraj who took the decisive last wicket, ensuring a hard-fought win for India.

England, chasing a challenging target of 374, found themselves at 339/6 by the close of the fourth day’s evening session, as bad lighting and rain halted play prematurely. Resuming the following day, India quickly wrapped up the remaining English wickets, resulting in England’s second innings concluding at 367 in 85.1 overs.

This victory significantly bolstered India’s standings in the World Test Championship (WTC) table, presenting them with an advantageous position, given their relatively uncomplicated schedule for the ongoing cycle.

The toss saw England opt to bowl first, setting the competitive tone for the match between the two cricketing giants.

The series prior to this fifth Test witnessed fluctuating fortunes for both teams. The results were as follows: England claimed the first Test at Headingley in Leeds by five wickets while India bounced back with a staggering 336-run win in the second Test at Edgbaston, Birmingham. The third Test at Lords saw England win by a narrow margin of 22 runs, and the fourth Test at Emirates Old Trafford in Manchester ended in a draw.

The playing XI for India included Yashasvi Jaiswal, KL Rahul, Sai Sudharsan, captain Shubman Gill, Karun Nair, Ravindra Jadeja, wicketkeeper Dhruv Jurel, Washington Sundar, Akash Deep, Prasidh Krishna, and Mohammed Siraj.

England’s team comprised Zak Crawley, Ben Duckett, captain Ollie Pope, Joe Root, Harry Brook, Jacob Bethell, wicketkeeper Jamie Smith, Chris Woakes, Gus Atkinson, Jamie Overton, and Josh Tongue.

The keenly contested series now paves the way for more exciting cricket as both teams continue to showcase prowess on international platforms.

Policy enhancements aim to prevent aliens who are males from being authorized to participate in women’s sports in the United States

WASHINGTON— U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is issuing guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual in alignment with Executive Order 14201, Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports, which directs the Department of Homeland Security to develop policies to prevent the entry of male athletes seeking to compete in women’s sports. USCIS will affirmatively protect all-female athletic opportunities by granting certain athlete-related petitions and applications, that had previously been abused and offered to men, only to women, ensuring that male aliens seeking immigration benefits aren’t coming to the U.S. to participate in women’s sports.

USCIS has clarified eligibility for certain visa categories: O-1A aliens of extraordinary ability, E11 aliens of extraordinary ability, E21 aliens of exceptional ability, and for national interest waivers (NIWs), to guarantee an even playing field for all women’s athletics in the United States.

“Men do not belong in women’s sports. USCIS is closing the loophole for foreign male athletes whose only chance at winning elite sports is to change their gender identity and leverage their biological advantages against women,” said USCIS Spokesperson Matthew Tragesser. “It’s a matter of safety, fairness, respect, and truth that only female athletes receive a visa to come to the U.S. to participate in women’s sports. The Trump Administration is standing up for the silent majority who’ve long been victims of leftist policies that defy common sense.”

This policy update clarifies that USCIS considers the fact that a male athlete has been competing against women as a negative factor in determining whether the alien is among the small percentage at the very top of the field; USCIS does not consider a male athlete who has gained acclaim in men’s sports and seeks to compete in women’s sports in the United States to be seeking to continue work in his area of extraordinary ability; male athletes seeking to enter the country to compete in women’s sports do not substantially benefit the United States; and it is not in the national interest to the United States to waive the job offer and, thus, the labor certification requirement for male athletes whose proposed endeavor is to compete in women’s sports.

The guidance, in Volumes 2 and 6 of the USCIS Policy Manual, is effective immediately and applies to benefit requests pending or filed on or after the publication date, is controlling, and supersedes any related prior guidance.

For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow us on X (formerly Twitter)InstagramYouTubeFacebook and LinkedIn.

US to Revoke Student Visas for Class, Program Absences

The U.S. government has cautioned international students that failing to comply with student visa regulations could result in the revocation of their visas and disqualification from future U.S. visa applications.

The United States has issued a stern warning to international students, emphasizing the significant repercussions of violating student visa standards. This advisory was disseminated via the official X handle of the U.S. Mission in Nigeria on Monday. The warning underscores that students who fail to attend classes, drop out, or exit their academic programs without duly informing their educational institutions may face the revocation of their U.S. student visas.

Moreover, these violations could also lead to disqualification from obtaining future U.S. visas, according to the message. The U.S. Mission strongly advised all student visa holders to comply strictly with the terms of their visas. Maintaining academic status and adhering to regulations are crucial to prevent any immigration complications.

The advisory clearly stated the importance of keeping educational institutions informed of any changes in academic status. It read, “If you drop out, skip classes, or leave your programs of study without informing your school, your student visa may be revoked, and you may lose eligibility for future U.S. visas.”

The U.S. government urges students to “always adhere to the terms of your visa and maintain your student status to avoid any issues,” highlighting the importance of compliance with visa regulations for international students in the United States.

This advisory serves as a reminder for the thousands of international students studying in the U.S. who rely on their student visas to continue their education. It is essential for these students to understand and fulfil all conditions attached to their visa status to prevent any unforeseen immigration issues that could impede their academic pursuits.

According to Punch, these directives form part of broader measures to ensure that international students in the United States adhere to the stipulations of their visa agreements.

Indian-American Returns to US, Cites India’s Reality in Viral Post

Dr. Rajeshwari Iyer’s return to India ended with disappointment over societal issues, prompting her to move back to the U.S., sparking diverse reactions online.

Dr. Rajeshwari Iyer, a respected alumna of the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay and the National Institute of Technology Puducherry, recently recounted her mixed experiences upon returning to India from the United States. Originally, she returned home with a strong desire to rebuild her life and contribute to her homeland, an aspiration that she hoped would bridge the gap between her expectations and reality.

In a post that quickly went viral on social media platform X, Dr. Iyer expressed her disillusionment with what she termed as the “ground reality” in India. She articulated her concerns over societal attitudes, highlighting issues such as high taxes, unchecked corruption, and what she perceived as a lack of meritocracy. “I used to find it funny when people said – ‘The end goal of every Indian is to leave India,’” she reflected in her post.

Dr. Iyer shared that her initial return from the United States was fueled by a sense of purpose and belief in contributing positively to her country. However, she felt let down by what she described as a society that often defends poor decisions and neglects fundamental problems. Eventually, she decided to return to the U.S., stating, “I’ve never felt more at peace.”

Despite the disappointment, Dr. Iyer emphasized that India holds a special place in her heart. Nonetheless, she revealed a reluctance to raise her children in what she called “an environment of hate, noise, and wilful ignorance.”

Her candid revelations ignited a range of responses online. Some users supported her decision as valid and highly personal. One user empathized with her choice, saying that prioritizing peace for family life needs no justification. They remarked, “Some of us stayed… and we’re trying. One small battle at a time.”

Conversely, some questioned her departure, suggesting that leaving might not resolve the issues she initially intended to tackle. A user questioned, “How far will we keep running? We need people like you to stay and fight.” Another person challenged her viewpoint, saying, “If your parents thought like you, you would not have known the wonder that is India… Your kids would be fine too. Stop with the obsession of perfection.”

Others acknowledged that imperfections exist in every country, but highlighted the “resilience” and “spirit” that make residing in India worthwhile. A user presented an introspective take on the situation, offering questions and empathy: “My sympathies are with you, and I can understand the challenges you faced. I have a few questions, if you’d be willing to answer honestly: What was the condition of India when you first went abroad? What were your expectations from Bharat when you returned? Have you noticed any changes during this period? I’d love to hear your perspective. Take care!”

Despite the variety of reactions, Dr. Rajeshwari Iyer remains steadfast in her decision, valuing her newfound clarity. For now, her choice for peace leads her back to the U.S., away from the country she once hoped to help reshape.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai Addresses IT Layoffs with Employees

Google CEO Sundar Pichai has urged employees to do more as the tech giant navigates challenges brought on by widespread layoffs in the IT industry, primarily due to artificial intelligence advancements and economic uncertainties.

Amid a bleak outlook for the global IT sector, Google CEO Sundar Pichai has issued a directive to his workforce with a simple but significant message: “I think we have to accomplish more.” This statement was made in an internal town hall meeting and reiterated through a company-wide memo directed at Google’s employees worldwide, emphasizing the need for increased productivity, innovation, and responsible corporate behavior.

Pichai’s communication emerges at a pivotal time for Google and its parent company, Alphabet, both of which are facing increasing competition in emerging fields such as artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud services. These challenges are compounded by broader economic pressures prompting major firms to reconsider and restructure their human capital.

In his message to employees, Pichai underscored the expectation that “The world is looking to Google for leadership and responsible innovation.” He urged employees to push their limits, work more smartly, and elevate the standards of success. Google aims to channel its resources strategically into areas considered key for future growth. These priorities include making substantial investments in AI, developing cutting-edge climate technology, and creating next-generation search experiences.

Pichai highlighted the importance of speeding up execution to rapidly convert ideas into tangible outcomes. He insisted on optimizing internal operations, eliminating redundancies, and enhancing collective team productivity by reviewing projects to ascertain their alignment with Google’s strategic targets.

Moreover, Brian Saluzzo, a leading figure at Google, stressed the importance of equipping software engineers with advanced tools to make “everybody at Google be more AI-savvy.” This involves integrating AI into coding processes to address leading needs and accelerate development timelines.

To support these initiatives, Saluzzo mentioned the creation of a robust suite of AI products designed for employees to facilitate faster progress. A focal point of this development is a platform called “AI Savvy Google,” which acts as a central resource hub. It offers diverse resources, including specialized courses, practical toolkits, and engaging learning sessions, to help employees better navigate the AI landscape.

According to Financial Express, these moves reflect Google’s proactive approach to maintaining its competitive edge while adapting to rapidly evolving technological and economic landscapes.

Sara Tendulkar Named Brand Ambassador for Australia Tourism

Sara Tendulkar, daughter of famed cricketer Sachin Tendulkar, has been named a brand ambassador for Australia’s new tourism initiative, the “Come and Say G’day” campaign.

Sara Tendulkar, daughter of legendary Indian cricketer Sachin Tendulkar, has been appointed as a brand ambassador for the Australian government’s ambitious tourism campaign, “Come and Say G’day.” This announcement marks a significant move by the Australian Tourism Ministry to revitalize its global tourism efforts.

The campaign, with a substantial investment of $130 million, is designed to lure international travelers to experience the diverse attractions that Australia offers. Initially, it will launch in China on August 7, with plans to expand into other significant international markets by the year’s end.

Among the intriguing elements of the “Come and Say G’day” campaign is its eclectic mix of brand ambassadors and mascots intended to resonate with a broad spectrum of global audiences. Ruby the Roo, the campaign’s original mascot, will be joined by a cast of international figures to create unique tourism invitations tailored to each target market.

Phillipa Harrison, Managing Director of Australian Tourism, expressed enthusiasm about Sara Tendulkar’s role, noting her status as an “entrepreneur and philanthropist” and her appeal to the Indian audience. Besides Tendulkar, the campaign will feature Australian wildlife conservationist Robert Irwin, son of the late Steve Irwin, for the U.S. market.

In the United Kingdom, the campaign spotlights food writer and television chef Nigella Lawson. Other personalities include actor Yosh Yu in China and Japanese comedian Abareru-kun. Additionally, Australian actor Thomas Weatherall will appear in the new series of advertisements.

Harrison highlighted that these international stars, combined with local Australian talent, are expected to craft tailor-made invitations for five major markets, each showcasing the unique tourism offerings travelers seek.

This latest effort is the second chapter of the “Come and Say G’day” campaign, which initially launched in October 2022. Spanning the next two years, this new phase brings the total investment by the Australian federal government in the campaign to $255 million since its inception.

This initiative reflects Australia’s commitment to boosting its tourism industry by engaging globally recognized personalities and creating culturally relevant marketing strategies to appeal to diverse audiences.

Source: Original article

Putin and Netanyahu Challenge Trump on Global Stage

President Trump is facing increasing challenges from Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, complicating his foreign policy efforts as both leaders remain steadfast in their controversial actions.

President Donald Trump finds himself mired in complex relations with two longstanding and sometimes contentious partners: Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Both leaders have added layers of difficulty to Trump’s global strategy, primarily due to their continued aggressive actions against Ukraine and Palestinians, respectively, and their reluctance to alter course.

The most pronounced shift in Trump’s attitude is toward Putin, who has ignored Trump’s calls to end the conflict in Ukraine, which began with Russia’s invasion in February 2022. Trump recently announced the deployment of two nuclear submarines to unspecified regions, a move prompted by what he described as “highly provocative statements” from Moscow. This escalation follows his tightening deadline for a ceasefire, mentioned during a trip to Scotland, from an indeterminate time frame to “10 or 12 days.”

However, Moscow appeared dismissive, with a Kremlin spokesperson declaring that Russia had developed “a certain immunity” to such threats. This scenario marks a significant departure from the atmosphere in February, when Trump and Vice President Vance criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office for alleged ingratitude towards American aid.

Trump’s rhetoric has shifted, distancing from earlier comments suggesting Ukraine’s culpability for the war. In recent months, Trump expressed frustration with Putin, noting that seemingly cordial interactions often preceded aggressive Russian actions against Ukraine.

“We get a lot of bulls‑‑‑ thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,” Trump remarked in early July. “He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.”

One underlying reason for Trump’s frustration could be the political quagmire Putin’s steadfastness creates for his administration, especially after Trump pledged during his campaign that he could resolve the conflict within 24 hours—a promise that remains unfulfilled.

Despite his frustrations, Trump seems unlikely to abandon his long-held skepticism about U.S. support for Ukraine, creating a political stalemate where the war neither ends nor sees dramatic U.S.-backed progress for Ukraine.

Similar complexities arise in Trump’s dealings with Netanyahu, though the specifics differ. While Trump has historically maintained a strong pro-Israel stance, evident in his first-term decisions like moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem and crafting a highly pro-Israel peace plan, his relationship with Netanyahu has been more volatile.

The tension heightened after Netanyahu recognized former President Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election, leading Trump to criticize Netanyahu for allegedly retreating from a joint operation with the U.S. to kill Qassem Soleimani, the head of Iran’s Quds Force, in January 2020.

“Bibi Netanyahu let us down,” Trump commented in late 2023.

While Trump continues to push pro-Israel policies in his second term, his tone varies significantly. He has both encouraged and seemed indifferent to Israeli ceasefires, and most recently, he countered Netanyahu’s denial of starvation in Gaza, citing footage suggesting children in Gaza appeared hungry.

In a recent move, Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited a Gaza aid distribution center run by the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, to “help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza,” highlighting a nuanced approach amidst broader support concerns for Israel from the U.S. right.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s comments branding Israeli actions in Gaza as “genocide,” alongside critical opinions from influential conservative figures like Tucker Carlson, Theo Von, and Joe Rogan, indicate a shift within Trump’s base that could influence future Middle East policies.

Netanyahu, meanwhile, remains focused on broader war goals, including hostage release and “total victory.” His coalition’s hard-line stance and personal legal challenges, such as delaying his corruption trial, further complicate U.S.-Israel diplomatic dynamics.

While Trump holds leverage through significant U.S. aid to Israel, whether he will apply pressure is uncertain. For now, interactions with both Putin and Netanyahu suggest continued entanglements that challenge Trump’s foreign policy ambitions.

Source: Original article

AICU demands release of Nuns in Chhattisgarh, condemns Rising Tide of Anti-Christian Violence in India

The 106 year old All India Catholic Union condemns the unjust arrest of two Catholic nuns, Sister Preetha
Mary and Sister Vandana Francis of the Assisi Sisters of Mary Immaculate (ASMI), and their Tribal aide
Sukhman Mandavi in Chhattisgarh on July 25, 2025 and demands their immediate and unconditional release.
The arrests, coupled with the refusal of bail by multiple courts, the involvement of the National Investigation
Agency (NIA), and the complicity of state authorities with anti-Christian elements linked to the Sangh Parivar,
represents a grave assault on religious freedom, minority rights, and the secular fabric of India, AICU
president Engr. Elias Vaz said.

The severity of the pan Indian hate campaign in the last few years by members of the ruling Bharatiya Janata
party and its allies in the Sangh Parivar can be gauged by the fact that that a Maharashtra BJP legislator
Gopichand Padalkar is offering Rs 5 Lakh [ $5,756 USD), to anyone for “thrashing a missionary, the second
one to be given Rs 4 lakh, while the third one to be given Rs 3 lakh as prizes.”

The arrest of Sisters Preetha Mary and Vandana Francis is a shameful chapter in India’s history, reflecting the
erosion of constitutional values and the rise of communal forces that threaten the nation’s secular identity. The
Christian community, which has made immense contributions to education, healthcare, and social welfare,
deserves respect and protection, not persecution.

Sisters Preetha Mary and Vandana Francis were arrested at Durg Railway Station in Chhattisgarh by the
Government Railway Police, based on baseless allegations of human trafficking and forced religious
conversion.

The nuns were accompanying three young Christian women, all over 18 years of age, who were traveling to
Agra for employment opportunities at a convent-run institution. These women carried written consent letters
from their families, clearly indicating their voluntary decision to seek work. The girls attested they we’re
Christians and were travelling at their volition but were being coerced to speak against the nuns.
A women Sangh member, Jyoti Sharma, was filmed attacking the nuns while they were in the railway police
station where the constables were witness to the attack.

Members of the Bajrang Dal, the youth wing of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and a key affiliate of the
Sangh Parivar, staged a disruptive protest at the railway station, falsely accusing the nuns of trafficking and
conversion.

The refusal of bail by both the Lower Court and the Sessions Court in Durg, followed by the transfer of the
case to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Court in Bilaspur, is a disturbing escalation that underscores
the politicization of the legal system. On July 30, 2025, Judge Aneesh Dubey of the Sessions Court ruled that
the case falls under the purview of the NIA due to the human trafficking charges, effectively delaying justice
and prolonging the nuns’ detention.

The involvement of the NIA, an agency typically tasked with handling terrorism-related cases, in a matter
involving baseless allegations against two nuns is both disproportionate and alarming. It suggests a deliberate
attempt to intimidate and suppress the Christian community by framing their legitimate activities as national security threats. This misuse of legal mechanisms to target minorities must be condemned in the strongest
terms.

The arrest of the nuns has sparked widespread protests across India, reflecting the deep sense of injustice
felt by citizens from all walks of life, in Kerala, the nuns’ home state.

The protests have extended beyond Kerala to Delhi, Bangalore, and other major cities.

On July 28 and 30, 2025, Members of Parliament from both the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) and the
opposition United Democratic Front (UDF) in Kerala staged demonstrations outside Parliament. Kerala Chief
Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, in a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, described the arrests as a “blatant
display of the Sangh Parivar’s real character” and demanded immediate intervention to ensure justice.

The arrest of the nuns is a stark reminder of the escalating anti-Christian violence in India, particularly in BJPruled states. According to the United Christian Forum, attacks against Christians have risen dramatically, from
127 incidents in 2014 to 834 over the past decade. In 2025 alone, the Christian community has faced
relentless persecution, including vandalism of churches, harassment of clergy, and disruption of religious
services.

States like Chhattisgarh, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha have become hotspots for such
violence, with Sangh Parivar affiliates acting with impunity under the protection of state governments.

The misuse of anti-conversion laws, such as the Chhattisgarh Religious Freedom Act, 1968, has become a
tool to target Christians, with vague provisions allowing for the harassment of missionaries and institutions.
The brutal killing of Graham Staines and his sons in Odisha in 1999 and the destruction of churches in
Gujarat’s Dang district are grim reminders of the Sangh Parivar’s history of violence against Christians.

We call for the following actions to address this grave injustice and the broader issue of anti-Christian violence
in India:

1. Immediate Release of the Nuns: The government must ensure the unconditional release of Sisters
Preetha Mary, Vandana Francis, and Sukhman Mandavi, and drop all charges against them.
2. Independent Investigation: An impartial inquiry must be conducted into the role of Bajrang Dal
activists and the complicity of the Chhattisgarh police in this incident.
3. Repeal of Anti-Conversion Laws: Draconian laws that enable the targeting of minorities must be
repealed to protect religious freedom.
4. Protection for Minorities: The Central and state governments must take concrete measures to curb
religious fanaticism and prevent mob violence against Christians and other minorities.

Catholic Union demands release of Nuns in Chhattisgarh and condemns Rising Tide of Anti-Christian Violence in India

ALL INDIA CATHOLIC UNION
Founded in 1919, Registered under Societies Registration Act 1850
Representing the Catholic Laity of India through 120 Diocesan Units Nation-wide
AICU ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, D. T. C. BUILDING, 6TH FLOOR, OFFICE NO.604 A, EDC COMPLEX, PATTO, PANAJI, GOA –
403001
Date: August 1, 2025
Press statement
AICU demands release of Nuns in Chhattisgarh, condemns Rising Tide of Anti-Christian Violence in India

The 106 year old All India Catholic Union condemns the unjust arrest of two Catholic nuns, Sister Preetha
Mary and Sister Vandana Francis of the Assisi Sisters of Mary Immaculate (ASMI), and their Tribal aide
Sukhman Mandavi in Chhattisgarh on July 25, 2025 and demands their immediate and unconditional release.
The arrests, coupled with the refusal of bail by multiple courts, the involvement of the National Investigation
Agency (NIA), and the complicity of state authorities with anti-Christian elements linked to the Sangh Parivar,
represents a grave assault on religious freedom, minority rights, and the secular fabric of India, AICU
president Engr. Elias Vaz said.
The severity of the pan Indian hate campaign in the last few years by members of the ruling Bharatiya Janata
party and its allies in the Sangh Parivar can be gauged by the fact that that a Maharashtra BJP legislator
Gopichand Padalkar is offering Rs 5 Lakh [ $5,756 USD), to anyone for “thrashing a missionary, the second
one to be given Rs 4 lakh, while the third one to be given Rs 3 lakh as prizes.”
The arrest of Sisters Preetha Mary and Vandana Francis is a shameful chapter in India’s history, reflecting the
erosion of constitutional values and the rise of communal forces that threaten the nation’s secular identity. The
Christian community, which has made immense contributions to education, healthcare, and social welfare,
deserves respect and protection, not persecution.
Sisters Preetha Mary and Vandana Francis were arrested at Durg Railway Station in Chhattisgarh by the
Government Railway Police, based on baseless allegations of human trafficking and forced religious
conversion.
The nuns were accompanying three young Christian women, all over 18 years of age, who were traveling to
Agra for employment opportunities at a convent-run institution. These women carried written consent letters
from their families, clearly indicating their voluntary decision to seek work. The girls attested they we’re
Christians and were travelling at their volition but were being coerced to speak against the nuns.
A women Sangh member, Jyoti Sharma, was filmed attacking the nuns while they were in the railway police
station where the constables were witness to the attack.
Members of the Bajrang Dal, the youth wing of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and a key affiliate of the
Sangh Parivar, staged a disruptive protest at the railway station, falsely accusing the nuns of trafficking and
conversion.
The refusal of bail by both the Lower Court and the Sessions Court in Durg, followed by the transfer of the
case to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Court in Bilaspur, is a disturbing escalation that underscores
the politicization of the legal system. On July 30, 2025, Judge Aneesh Dubey of the Sessions Court ruled that
the case falls under the purview of the NIA due to the human trafficking charges, effectively delaying justice
and prolonging the nuns’ detention.
The involvement of the NIA, an agency typically tasked with handling terrorism-related cases, in a matter
involving baseless allegations against two nuns is both disproportionate and alarming. It suggests a deliberate
attempt to intimidate and suppress the Christian community by framing their legitimate activities as national
Administrative Office: DTC Building, 6th Floor, 604 A,EDC Complex, Patto Plaza, Panaji, Goa – 403001
Tel: (0832) 2437026 Email: aicufile@yahoo.com

ALL INDIA CATHOLIC UNION
Founded in 1919, Registered under Societies Registration Act 1850
Representing the Catholic Laity of India through 120 Diocesan Units Nation-wide
AICU ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, D. T. C. BUILDING, 6TH FLOOR, OFFICE NO.604 A, EDC COMPLEX, PATTO, PANAJI, GOA –
403001
security threats. This misuse of legal mechanisms to target minorities must be condemned in the strongest
terms.

The arrest of the nuns has sparked widespread protests across India, reflecting the deep sense of injustice
felt by citizens from all walks of life, in Kerala, the nuns’ home state.
The protests have extended beyond Kerala to Delhi, Bangalore, and other major cities.
On July 28 and 30, 2025, Members of Parliament from both the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) and the
opposition United Democratic Front (UDF) in Kerala staged demonstrations outside Parliament. Kerala Chief
Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, in a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, described the arrests as a “blatant
display of the Sangh Parivar’s real character” and demanded immediate intervention to ensure justice.
The arrest of the nuns is a stark reminder of the escalating anti-Christian violence in India, particularly in BJP
ruled states. According to the United Christian Forum, attacks against Christians have risen dramatically, from
127 incidents in 2014 to 834 over the past decade. In 2025 alone, the Christian community has faced
relentless persecution, including vandalism of churches, harassment of clergy, and disruption of religious
services.
States like Chhattisgarh, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha have become hotspots for such
violence, with Sangh Parivar affiliates acting with impunity under the protection of state governments.
The misuse of anti-conversion laws, such as the Chhattisgarh Religious Freedom Act, 1968, has become a
tool to target Christians, with vague provisions allowing for the harassment of missionaries and institutions.
The brutal killing of Graham Staines and his sons in Odisha in 1999 and the destruction of churches in
Gujarat’s Dang district are grim reminders of the Sangh Parivar’s history of violence against Christians.
We call for the following actions to address this grave injustice and the broader issue of anti-Christian violence
in India:
1. Immediate Release of the Nuns: The government must ensure the unconditional release of Sisters
Preetha Mary, Vandana Francis, and Sukhman Mandavi, and drop all charges against them.

2. Independent Investigation: An impartial inquiry must be conducted into the role of Bajrang Dal
activists and the complicity of the Chhattisgarh police in this incident.

3. Repeal of Anti-Conversion Laws: Draconian laws that enable the targeting of minorities must be
repealed to protect religious freedom.

4. Protection for Minorities: The Central and state governments must take concrete measures to curb
religious fanaticism and prevent mob violence against Christians and other minorities.
Released to the Media for publication. For any details, please contact the Official Spokesman, Dr John Dayal,
+91 9811021072; john.dayal@gmail.com
_____
Administrative Office: DTC Building, 6th Floor, 604 A,EDC Complex, Patto Plaza, Panaji, Goa – 403001

Modi Faces Challenges from Trump’s Tariffs and Remarks

U.S. President Donald Trump’s introduction of steep tariffs on India, alongside his criticisms of its economy and overtures to Pakistan, have placed Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a challenging political position.

Recent developments in international trade and diplomacy have significantly impacted India’s political landscape, focusing attention on Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Trump’s recent tariffs on Indian goods, coupled with his unfavorable remarks about India’s economy, have posed distinct challenges for Modi, separate from the broader national implications.

Modi, who has worked hard to present himself as a global statesman with close ties to influential world leaders, particularly in the United States, finds this carefully cultivated image under threat. The tariffs and Trump’s public criticism undermine Modi’s portrayal as a leader who can safeguard Indian interests on the global stage. Additionally, China’s persistent pressure without concessions adds to Modi’s burden, weakening his political image at home where foreign visits have been a tool to project his influence.

Opposition parties in India have seized on Trump’s critique of the Indian economy, labeling it “dead,” to challenge Modi’s economic strategies and foreign relations efforts. They argue that Modi’s previous support for Trump has backfired, leaving India diplomatically sidelined and economically vulnerable. This view is amplified by Modi’s recent omission of Trump’s name in a Lok Sabha speech, despite opposition leader Rahul Gandhi’s challenge to address the issue. This omission is used by political adversaries to portray Modi as reluctant to oppose the U.S. president, providing further fuel for criticism at a time when intra-party challenges are also emerging, particularly concerning the election of a new BJP president.

The economic repercussions of the U.S. tariffs are considerable. They pose risks to India’s export competitiveness, investor confidence, and Modi’s ambitious plans to attract global manufacturing to India. Affected sectors include labor-intensive industries like textiles, jewelry, and electronics, which may experience significant job losses. These developments threaten Modi’s narrative of transforming India into a global economic powerhouse, possibly endangering his vision of lifting India to the status of the world’s fourth-largest economy. Further complications could arise if the U.S. imposes penalties related to India’s policy towards Russia, potentially leading to higher energy prices and increased fiscal deficits.

Trump’s actions regarding Pakistan further complicate the situation for Modi. By equating India and Pakistan, Trump undermines Modi’s efforts to position India as a dominant regional power juxtaposed with its neighbors. This perceived American tilt towards Pakistan disrupts the nationalist rhetoric that is central to Modi’s support base, which values India’s independent global stature.

The sudden imposition of tariffs by Trump, notably higher than those encountered by other Asian economies, signals a disregard for prior diplomatic engagements, including Modi’s attempts to maintain amicable relations with the U.S. This abrupt policy shift leaves New Delhi with limited options, potentially requiring difficult concessions that could further negatively impact the economy.

As Modi grapples with these international challenges, his long-standing governance comes under scrutiny, with nowhere to deflect responsibility for the economic downturn. The situation marks a pivotal moment in Modi’s tenure, as foundational aspects of his political strength and domestic appeal are directly confronted by external forces.

Ultimately, Trump’s current diplomatic stance affects not only India but also directly challenges Modi’s political leadership and brand, presenting significant hurdles in his eleventh year in office, according to The Wire.

VFS Global Opens 8 New Indian Consular Centers in U.S.

The Indian Mission in the United States and VFS Global have announced the inauguration of eight new Indian Consular Application Centres (ICACs) in major U.S. cities, significantly expanding service accessibility for the 5.3 million Indian diaspora.

The Indian Mission in the United States and VFS Global, a leader in trusted technology services, have unveiled eight new Indian Consular Application Centres (ICACs) in the cities of Boston, Columbus, Dallas, Detroit, Edison, Orlando, Raleigh, and San Jose. This expansion brings the total number of ICACs in the United States to 16, enhancing service accessibility for the Indian diaspora and other applicants across the country.

A further expansion is planned with the opening of another ICAC in Los Angeles scheduled for August, which will increase the total number of centers nationwide to 17. These centers are vital, providing a range of essential services such as India Visa application, Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI), passport application, renunciation of Indian citizenship, Police clearance certificate, Global Entry Programme (GEP), and various miscellaneous/attestation services.

VFS Global remains the exclusive service provider for these important functions on behalf of the Government of India in the United States. The newly launched ICACs are part of a broader initiative to streamline the application process with several enhancements.

The enhancements include ICACs remaining open on Saturdays, offering greater flexibility for applicants. Additionally, return courier services are now part of the standard service fees. Basic amenities like photographs, photocopies, and form filling will be available at no extra cost. A broader range of consular services will also be accessible, improving overall convenience for applicants.

The Ambassador of India to the United States, Vinay Mohan Kwatra, highlighted the importance of the new centers, stating, “We are very happy to announce the opening of eight new Indian Consular Application Centres. With the opening of these centers, our presence to deliver extensive consular services will expand significantly, making them more accessible and faster for the vibrant Indian diaspora.”

The new ICACs are anticipated to benefit the Indian community within the consular jurisdiction of the Indian Consulate in cities like Atlanta, Chicago, Houston, New York, San Francisco, Seattle, and Washington D.C. The centers are equipped with world-class facilities aimed at providing a customer-centric experience, thereby making the application process more convenient.

Amit Kumar Sharma, Head of North America & Caribbean for VFS Global, emphasized the importance of these centers, “We are honored by the continued trust the Government of India has placed in VFS Global. These ICACs will play a crucial role in effectively meeting the growing demand for visa and consular services to India spurred by business partnerships, tourism, and trade.”

Established in 2008, VFS Global is the first outsourced visa services partner of the Ministry of External Affairs (India), offering passport, visa, and consular services for the Indian government. Since 2020, the firm has been providing these services across the United States and manages Application Centres for the Government of India across seven countries, including Australia, Iraq, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

VFS Global stands as a global leader in trusted technology services, offering non-judgmental and administrative task management related to applications for visa, passport, and consular services for client governments worldwide. Inaugurating over 3,900 Application Centres in 165 countries, the company has processed over 499 million applications since 2001, with a focus on ethical practices and sustainability.

Headquartered in Zurich and Dubai, VFS Global is majorly owned by investment funds managed by Blackstone Inc., with stakeholders such as Swiss-based Kuoni and Hugentobler Foundation, according to Glocal Konsult.

Source: Original article

Shah Rukh Khan Wins First National Award After 33 Years

Shah Rukh Khan has been awarded his first National Film Award for Best Actor, marking a long-awaited milestone in his distinguished career.

After an illustrious career spanning over 33 years, Bollywood icon Shah Rukh Khan has received his first National Film Award for his role in Jawan. The recognition is seen as a significant milestone for the actor, who is affectionately known as the “King of Bollywood.” This award comes on the heels of a storied journey marked by numerous acclaimed and commercially successful films.

The 71st National Film Awards, announced today, honored Shah Rukh with the Best Actor award for his powerful performance in Jawan. Despite his long list of achievements across both critically lauded and blockbuster movies, this marks his first National Award. Many in the industry and among his fanbase view this achievement as long overdue.

Shah Rukh Khan began his film career in 1992 with Deewana and swiftly ascended to become one of India’s most celebrated and bankable actors. Over the years, he has starred in films such as Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge, Swades, Chak De! India, and My Name Is Khan, each earning critical acclaim.

Despite being a fan favorite, Shah Rukh often found the prestigious National Film Award just out of his reach. In 2004, his performance as Mohan Bhargava, a NASA engineer reconnecting with his roots in Swades, was highly praised but overshadowed by Saif Ali Khan’s win for Hum Tum.

His role in Chak De! India as Kabir Khan, a hockey coach on a redemption path, led to the film winning a National Award, yet Shah Rukh himself was once again passed over for Best Actor, a title which went to Hrithik Roshan for Dhoom 2 in 2007.

In 2010, Shah Rukh delivered a powerful performance in My Name Is Khan, portraying Rizwan Khan, a man with Asperger’s Syndrome navigating a complex global backdrop. While it won international accolades, Amitabh Bachchan took the National Award for Best Actor that year for his role in Paa.

Finally receiving this recognition after years of near misses, Shah Rukh Khan’s fans and critics alike believe the award confirms his status not only as a beloved superstar but also as one of the finest actors working in Indian cinema today.

Beyond this recent accolade, Shah Rukh Khan’s contributions to cinema have been recognized with numerous prestigious honors. He is a recipient of the Padma Shri, one of India’s highest civilian awards, and has been awarded two of France’s distinguished titles, the Ordre des Arts et des Lettres and the Legion of Honour.

His journey to receiving a National Award underscores a career marked by persistence, outstanding performances, and a profound impact on audiences worldwide, cementing his legacy in the annals of Indian film history.

According to Hindustan Times.

Source: Original article

India Successfully Launches $1.5 Billion NASA Satellite

India successfully launched the world’s most expensive Earth-observation satellite, a $1.5 billion joint project with NASA, marking a significant milestone in international space collaboration.

After over a decade of development, NASA’s science leadership traveled to India this week to witness the launch of the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) satellite. This marks the most expensive Earth-observation satellite project to date, with a price tag of $1.5 billion. The satellite successfully launched into orbit on Wednesday aboard India’s Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle, a medium-lift rocket.

The NISAR mission is designed to observe Earth’s land and ice surfaces from a Sun-synchronous orbit located 464 miles (747 kilometers) above the planet. The satellite will gather crucial data from these surfaces, including the polar regions, twice every 12 days. This data collection is expected to provide valuable insights into how various terrestrial surfaces change over time, including the impact of climate change.

The satellite’s main innovation lies in its combination of two synthetic aperture radar instruments. NASA has contributed the L-band radar, which is particularly effective at measuring soil moisture, forests, and the movements of land and ice surfaces. ISRO’s contribution, an S-band radar, excels at monitoring agricultural changes, as well as grassland and human-made structures.

Although synthetic aperture radar technology has been under development by NASA and other space organizations for decades, the NISAR spacecraft is one of the first missions to integrate two different radar bands on a single platform. This integration provides a more comprehensive real-time view of changes occurring on Earth’s surface.

Following the successful launch, the spacecraft will enter a three-month commissioning phase. During this period, the NISAR satellite will deploy a large antenna reflector measuring 39 feet (12 meters) in diameter. The reflector will be responsible for sending and receiving microwaves, enabling the satellite to accurately measure surface changes.

The mission’s collaborative nature and significant budget make it notable. Earth observation missions usually cost less due to lower requirements for deep-space durability. For NASA-Isro, however, this is their most complex and costly collaboration to date. The success of this partnership could pave the way for future cooperative projects such as the Artemis program.

V. Narayanan, chairman of the Indian space agency, expressed enthusiasm for the mission’s capability to study Earth’s dynamic land and ice surfaces with unprecedented detail. “With this successful launch, we are at the threshold of fulfilling the immense scientific potential NASA and ISRO envisioned for the NISAR mission more than 10 years ago,” he said.

The agreement between NASA and ISRO to design and develop the satellite was signed on September 30, 2014, with an initial launch target set for 2024. Missing this target by less than a year is considered a respectable achievement by both space agencies.

Following the successful launch, NASA Acting Administrator Sean Duffy took to social media site X to celebrate the event. In his post, however, Duffy mistakenly credited former President Donald Trump with facilitating the mission’s success. “The mission is a joint U.S.-India effort, negotiated by President TRUMP,” Duffy wrote. “Thanks to his LEADERSHIP & our friends at @ISRO, @NASA is Making Space Great Again!” However, Trump’s presidency began nearly two and a half years after the initial negotiation between NASA and ISRO.

Despite the factual inaccuracy, Duffy’s acknowledgment of the mission’s importance—even amid proposed cuts to NASA’s science programs during Trump’s administration—could serve as a reminder of the value of such projects in understanding Earth’s changing environment.

Birthright Citizenship and the U.S. Constitution

On his first day in office, President Trump issued an executive order challenging the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of birthright citizenship, sparking a series of legal battles across the United States.

President Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship via executive order marked the start of numerous legal challenges, as state attorneys general, civil rights organizations, and immigrant groups swiftly filed lawsuits. This debate centers on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

The longstanding interpretation of this amendment has consistently affirmed a wide-ranging grant of citizenship. Highlighting this understanding, the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark confirmed that the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship to all U.S.-born individuals, including those born to non-citizen parents. Notably, exceptions are rare, applying to cases such as children born to foreign diplomats.

Executive Order 14160, signed by Trump, seeks to deny citizenship to children born in the United States to mothers present unlawfully or temporarily and to fathers who are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents. This would exclude the children of undocumented immigrants and those holding temporary visas, such as student or work visas, from being recognized as U.S. citizens.

The order directs federal agencies to withhold documents confirming citizenship for these children, implying a denial of passports and social security numbers, while potentially still receiving birth certificates.

The 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, ratified in 1868, was designed to settle debates surrounding citizenship eligibility decisively. Prior to this, the legal stance on citizenship was largely ambiguous, particularly regarding non-white persons born in the U.S. Early legal interpretations generally held that U.S.-born individuals were citizens, but this did not necessarily extend to enslaved or free Black persons, who faced significant legal vulnerabilities.

In the landmark Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, the Supreme Court infamously ruled that Black people could not be U.S. citizens. This controversial decision was later rebuked by Republicans post-Civil War, leading to the inclusion of an unequivocal citizenship guarantee within the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.

Congressional debate records reveal that the 14th Amendment’s inclusive citizenship guarantee was always intended to cover children of immigrants, regardless of parental legal status. During the 1866 discussions, Senator Jacob Howard clarified that the clause reflected existing national and natural law, affirming the citizenship of all born within U.S. borders. Despite concerns voiced by some lawmakers, Senator John Conness supported the inclusive nature of the language, emphasizing equal civil rights for all native-born individuals.

The Supreme Court reiterated this interpretation in Wong Kim Ark, dismissing claims against citizenship for U.S.-born children of non-citizens.

If implemented, Trump’s executive order could cause widespread issues, potentially rendering hundreds of thousands of children stateless, stripping them of essential rights and protections associated with citizenship. Stateless individuals lack access to crucial services and rights, including healthcare, education, and travel, and might face deportation to unfamiliar countries.

Additionally, the order risks creating severe bureaucratic challenges, as government entities would lose the reliability of birth certificates for citizenship verification, leading to increased potential for discriminatory practices.

Following numerous lawsuits disputing the order’s constitutionality, several federal district courts issued temporary blocks. The matter escalated to the Supreme Court in Trump v. CASA, where a divided court decided that universal preliminary injunctions are unlawful unless necessary to protect claimants’ rights. This decision led to further deliberations by lower courts without addressing the executive order’s constitutional validity.

While the Supreme Court’s recent decision allows for the potential enforcement of the order, recent lower court rulings have affirmed extensive blocks on its implementation. Despite the current legal ambiguity, many legal experts assert that the order is clearly unconstitutional, anticipating a future Supreme Court decision on the matter.

The question of birthright citizenship remains a contentious topic, with ongoing legal proceedings likely to shape this critical aspect of American citizenship law.

Source: Original article

Trump Imposes 25% Tariff on Indian Imports

President Donald Trump has announced a 25% tariff on imports from India, marking the latest development in his aggressive trade policy during his second term.

President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday that imports from India will be subjected to a new 25% tariff. This decision is the most recent action in his administration’s vigorous trade policies that have increasingly become a focal point of his presidency.

The announcement, made via Trump’s social media platform Truth Social, cited India’s existing tariffs as being “far too high” and criticized their trade restrictions as “strenuous and obnoxious.” Additionally, Trump mentioned penalties targeting India’s reliance on Russian energy and military hardware.

Trump’s declaration arrives just before a crucial trade negotiation deadline on Friday, which he asserted would remain firm without extensions. He has indicated that a plethora of other nations could also experience elevated baseline tariff levels, potentially reaching as high as 20%, which builds on the already heightened 10% tariffs introduced in April.

The potential tariff levels could approach the historic highs that Trump initially proposed on April 2, deemed “Liberation Day,” which had initially unsettled global markets and triggered stock market declines.

Having initially retreated from those threats, President Trump has gradually reinstated elevated tariff measures, reminiscent of levels seen during the 1930s when protectionist trade strategies were employed in a bid to reinvigorate the U.S. economy, albeit with counterproductive outcomes that exacerbated the Great Depression.

According to the Yale University Budget Lab, as of their recent Monday analysis, U.S. consumers face a de facto tariff rate of 18.2%, the highest since 1934. This could result in a household loss equivalent of up to $2,400 by 2025. Notably, these figures were calculated before Trump’s recent tariff announcement on India.

While the 25% tariff on Indian imports is lower than the previously suggested 26% on April 2, it marks a substantial rise from India’s customary average tariff rate of 2.4% on exports to the U.S. In recent years, India has been a critical partner for the U.S., exporting approximately $90 billion in annual goods.

India recently overtook other suppliers as the leading source of smartphones imported into the United States, aligning with Apple’s strategic move to relocate production away from China due to heightened tariffs and geopolitical tensions, as reported by Bloomberg. Apple notably exported $17 billion worth of iPhones from India last year.

Apple CEO Tim Cook noted during the company’s May 1 earnings call that, starting this quarter, the majority of iPhones sold in the U.S. would likely originate from India.

beyond smartphones, the U.S. imports a variety of products from India, including chemicals, plastics, leather goods, agricultural commodities, and metals.

In the previous year, India imposed an average tariff rate of 5.2% on U.S. goods, primarily purchasing oil, cement, stone, glass, and machinery from American markets.

President Trump’s focus on tariffs as a key trade strategy perpetuates a climate of unpredictability within the global economy. Over recent weeks, Trump has unveiled new agreements with several other countries aimed at refining trade conditions with the U.S. Despite the intentions, critics argue these deals are mired in ambiguous details and difficult promises to implement.

However, major stock indices have shown resilience and have continued to rise, partly because some companies observe that the tariffs’ impact may not be as severe as initially anticipated when Trump first introduced his sweeping country-specific tariffs in April.

Nonetheless, the recently negotiated bilateral trade agreements come with tariffs significantly higher than historical norms. These agreements stipulate 19% tariffs on goods from Indonesia and the Philippines, and 15% tariffs on imports from Japan and the European Union.

Furthermore, a new deal with Vietnam imposes tariffs of 20% on its exports, with potential increases to 40% for goods rerouted from China.

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty Assumes Charge as President of AAPI

CMEs, AI in Medicine, Health & Wellbeing, Women’s Forum, CEO Forum, Bollywood Extravaganza, Medical Research and Jeopardy Fill AAPI’s 43rd Annual Convention in Cincinnati, OH

Cincinnati, OH – July 27th: A historic moment unfolded as Dr. Amit Chakrabarty and Dr. Hetal Gor formally assumed charge as the President and the Chair, BOT respectively of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) during the 43rd annual convention at the iconic Cincinnati Marriott at RiverCenter and Northern Kentucky Convention Center, Cincinnati, OH on Saturday, July 26th, 2025 as the convention came to a close with the gala attended by over 1,000 delegates from across the nation.

AAPI Convention 3

During a solemn ceremony Dr. Satheesh Kathula, the outgoing President of AAPI, passed on the gavel to Dr. Amit Chakrabarty during the Gala on Saturday night at the end of the convention, marking a new chapter of service, collaboration, and vision. The event brought together hundreds of members of AAPI, past leaders, and incoming officers, symbolizing unity and a shared commitment to elevating the voice of Indian-origin physicians across the U.S.

Along with Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, his executive committee consisting of Dr. Meher Medavaram, President-Elect; Dr. Krishan Kumar, Vice President;  Dr. Seema Arora, Secretary; and Dr. Soumya NeravetlaTreasurer, assumed charge as part of the new Executive Committee.  Dr. Hetal Gor assumed charge as the Chair, BOT. Dr. Gautam Kamthan will serve as the President, YPS, and Dr. Priyanka Kolli is the President, MSRF, both, representing the Medical Students and Fellows at the national AAPI.

“Today marks a sacred beginning—one that’s not only about taking oath, but about embracing purpose,” said Dr. Chakrabarty, immediately after taking charge as the President of AAPI, the nation’s largest ethnic medical association. “This stage is illuminated not just by lights, but by the commitment of every physician who’s journeyed with faith, resilience, and passion. With this new chapter, we honor our heritage, step forward with courage, and vow to lead with integrity.”

“I am committed to unify AAPI by breaking down the barriers of various regions, languages, medical education within the organization and bringing everyone together as a whole organization rather than separate fragments of the organization,” Dr. Chakrabarty said.

Dr. Chakrabarty rose through the ranks of AAPI with his hard work and dedication, serving AAPI for nearly a quarter century. “We have the potential to make a significant impact on the healthcare landscape of this country,” Dr. Chakrabarty asserted. “My goal this year is to unify AAPI by transcending the regional divides that have hindered our progress in recent years. Indian American physicians represent tremendous talent and potential, and the key to realizing that lies in collective action and a united voice—something I am committed to fostering.”

AAPI Convention 1

As he steps into this leadership role, Dr. Chakrabarty pledged to work toward strengthening and expanding AAPI, which represents the interests of over 120,000 Indian American physicians, Residents, and Fellows. The Alabama-based urologist envisions a future where AAPI becomes “more vibrant, united, transparent, and politically active,” with increased membership and a stronger presence among younger physicians. He emphasized the importance of ensuring that “AAPI’s voice is heard in the corridors of power.”

He underscored transparency with regular Townhall meetings with members and direct accessibility to answer any questions that the members have, providing a platform to answer any concerns, where elected BOT/EC members will present their findings based on a rational, non-biased, and objective review that will be communicated with the members and posted on the AAPI website.

Working with his dedicated executive committee, Dr. Chakrabarty wants that “our voices must be heard by the people making the laws. AAPI must succeed in bringing to the forefront the many important health care issues facing the physician community and raising our voice unitedly before the US lawmakers. Our membership is our strength; as the 2nd largest medical association behind the AMA, we cannot stay silent any longer,” he said.

In his warm farewell address, Dr. Kathula shared with the audience the many programs and initiatives he and his executive committee have organized in the past year since assuming charge as the President of AAPI. Dr. Kathula, among others, highlighted the successful organization of Global health Summit in New Delhi and Hyderabad, and the many initiatives at the Summit,  research contest and the many charitable works and the webinars and workshops, as wells the Bone Marrow and Share a Blanket initiatives..

AAPI Convention 2

Dr. Kathula presented Presidential Awards to: Dr. Bhushan Pandya, Dr. Sunil Kaza, Dr. Vemuri Murthy, and Dr. Dwarkanda Reddy for their accomplishments and contribution to AAPI and to the larger society.  Dr. Satheesh Kathula was honored for his outstanding leadership, commitment to AAPI’s mission, and for carrying the entire AAPI family together, as well as for his contributions to realize the lofty goals of AAPI.

“The organizing committees have been working hard to make the AAPI Convention of 2025 rewarding and memorable for all. They have been working hard to put together an attractive program for our annual get together, educational activities, and family enjoyment. We are fortunate to have a dedicated team of convention committee members from the Ohio region helping us,” Dr. Kathula said. He particularly called out Vijaya Kodali, for her dedication, integrity, and hard work as she manages AAPI office and coordinates the activities related to AAPI functioning.

At the BOT luncheon, physicians with distinguished achievements and community services were honored. Dr. Navin Nanda, Dr. P K Vedantham, Dr. Krishan Kumar,  Dr. Jagdish Gupta, Dr. Ravi Parikh, and Dr. Avi Singh Gandhi were honored with AAPI’s prestigious Service Awards. Winners of the Research/Poster Presentation from across the nation who had presented the abstracts of their research on diverse medical topics, were honored with cash awards.

Reflecting back on AAPI’s progress over the last year, Dr. Sunil Kaza, the outgoing BOT Chair, said during the luncheon meeting, “Start of AAPI 2024-2025 term was like a storm, the likes of which, AAPI had never seen before !” and added, “Despite multiple and significant challenges, together with our EC, BOT and committee members, we have fulfilled our PROMISES.”

Dr. Hetral Gor shared with the audience, her journey as an ordinary member to how she has grown to be the chair of AAPI BOT. She described her plans for AAPI as the new Chair that she plans to initiative in collaboration with the new Executive Committee led by Dr. Amit Chakrabarty.

With the lighting of the traditional lamp and cutting the ribbon by Jacqueline Coleman, Lieutenant Governor of Kentucky, Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, president of the American Medical Association, Dr. D Nageshwar Reddy, a Padma Vibhushan awardee, Dr. Kathula, Dr. Sunil Kaza, outgoing Chair of AAPI BOT, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, Dr. Hetal Gor, and Dr. Meher Medavram, President-Elect of AAPI. The ceremony began with the beautiful rendition of the national anthems of both the US and India by Dr. Aarti Pandya.

AAPI Convention 2025 4

Speakers at the Convention included: Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, president of the American Medical Association; Dr. Lyuba Konopasek, MD, Senior Vice President, Intealth/ECFMG, Executive Director, FAIMER; Michael Suk, MD, BOT Chair, AMA; George Abraham, MD, Chair, Federation of State Medical Boards; and Dr. D Nageshwar Reddy, a Padma Vibhushan awardee. Dr. Mario Capecchi, a Nobel laureate, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine/Physiology in 2007 for his contributions to the development of “Mouse knockout technology” delivered the keynote address at the AAPI Convention. Their addresses to the audience offered unprecedented insights into healthcare’s evolving landscape.

“I’ve been an AAPI member since I started medical school, and I’m an AMA member. But it’s like having a left hand and a right hand that don’t interact much. And that needs to be improved,” Dr. Bobby Mukamala, President of the American Medical Association, said in his keynote address. “I’m excited to be the first Indian descent president of the AMA to integrate that more. So that AAPI and the AMA both work together to improve physicians’ ability to take care of patients and the health of this country. Both are critical to make that happen, and if two critical aspects aren’t working together. We can work together, and we can watch them grow exponentially. When we work together, it will be exponential growth for both organizations.”

Jennifer Coleman, Lt. Governor of Kentucky, told AAPI members that, “We have so much appreciation for the work that you do, your compassion, the care that you provide, the long hours, the sacrifices that you make and that your families make. And you are the reason that the Governor and I refer to you as a title you have truly earned, which is healthcare heroes. So, thank you for what you do.”

Congressman Jonathan Jackson from Illinois, 1st congressional district sated, “Thank you for your outstanding leadership of this august body.”

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty Assumes Charge as President of AAP

Aftab Pureval, Mayor of Cincinnati, shared with the audience his life story as a child born to refugees from the Himalayas to the United States. “And it’s because of Trailblazers like you that next generations like me and my brother can pursue our dreams in whatever field that may be. Congratulations everybody! So excited for you to choose Cincinnati, and I hope you have a wonderful conference.”

The Convention was packed with 10 hours of Continuing Medical Education (CME) sessions delivered by world-renowned speakers, Women’s Forum, and specialized tracks on Medical Education and Medical Licensing, AAPI Has Got Talent, entertainment by world renowned artists, and upcoming talents from the local community.

“Whether you are a physician, a healthcare professional, or an industry partner, this convention has presented a valuable opportunity to showcase your business and connect with influential leaders in the medical field, said Dr. Meher Medavaram, President-Elect. “We are delighted to have you all in Cincinnati for this exceptional event.

The Convention delivered groundbreaking insights into modern healthcare, featuring top medical professionals from across the nation. Artificial Intelligence emerged as a critical theme, with Dr. Suresh Reddy and Dr. Nageshwara Rao explored AI’s transformative potential in healthcare delivery and patient management, while highlighting ethical considerations in medical technology.

Daily morning programs focused on sleep techniques and anxiety management, providing physicians innovative strategies for personal and professional well-being, emphasizing holistic professional development.

The Medical Licensing Forum, led by Dr. Amol Soin, brought together state medical board representatives to discuss critical practice pathways and professional standards. A comprehensive research symposium showcased cutting-edge medical research, with poster presentations and awards recognizing outstanding contributions to medical science.

According to Dr. Krishan Kumar, “The annual convention offered extensive academic presentations, recognition of achievements and achievers, and professional networking at the alumni and evening social events, in addition to offering an exciting venue to interact with leading physicians, healthcare industry leaders, academicians, and scientists of Indian origin.”

“The conference brought together acclaimed Physicians, healthcare professionals and leaders, in addition to including Academicians, Researchers and Medical students from across the world for a dynamic exchange of ideas, serving as a collaborative effort to shape the future of healthcare on a global scale,” Dr. Soumya Neravetla, Treasurer of AAPI said.

On July 24th, AAPI delegates had an exclusive Cruise on the majestic River Queen Boat at the famous Ohio River, with entertainment, live music, and dance.  “It was such a memorable experience, having a glimpse at the skyline and watching the river on a sightseeing cruise along the Ohio River departing from the Kentucky side of Cincinnati, and experiencing live entertainment as you go,” said Dr. Hetal Gor. The Biriyani Nite with Bollywood music on the banks of the Ohio River that went into midnight was yet another experience for the AAPI delegates at the convention.

Special Highlights at the Convention included, Women’s Forum, Cultural Extravaganza, Networking opportunities, Cruise and Entertainment on the Ohio River and Gala dinners celebrating medical excellence. . In addition to the academic and professional offerings, attendees enjoyed three nights of world-class entertainment, making this a well-rounded and memorable gathering.

The convention successfully bridged medical expertise, technological innovation, and professional networking, setting new benchmarks for the future of healthcare.

Dr. Chakrabarty urged all AAPI members to join in this historic journey. “AAPI’s mission is clear, our programs will continue to strive, and our impact is infectious in benefiting society. Today I ask you to set aside your differences and join me in this noble journey to make our mission possible. A new era has begun. AAPI will continue to discover her own potential to be an active and vital player in shaping the landscape of the national healthcare delivery system with a focus on health maintenance than disease intervention,” Dr. Chakrabarty said.

Dr. Chakrabarty invited AAPI members to “come and participate at the 44th annual convention to be held in Tampa, FL from July 2nd to 5th, 2026. We look forward to having you all join us in Tampa, FL!” For more information on AAPI and the 44th convention, please visit: www.aapiconvention.org. For more details on AAPI, please visit: www.aapiusa.org

Ajay Ghosh

Media Coordinator, AAPI

Phone # 203.583.6750

Dr. Hetal Gor Assumes Charge as AAPI BOT Chair

“We decided to ride the storm! We decided to right the ship!” Dr. Sunil Kaza  Said in His Farewell Address During AAPI’s 43rd Annual Convention in Cincinnati, OH

Cincinnati, OH – July 26th: Dr. Hetal Gor, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist from New Jersey, assumed charge as the Chair, Board of Trustees of AAPI, during the 43rd annual convention being organized here at the at the iconic Cincinnati Marriott at RiverCenter and Northern Kentucky Convention Center, Cincinnati, OH on Saturday, July 65, 2025. Dr. Sunil Kaza, the outgoing BOT Chair, during the luncheon meeting as part of the Convention officially handed over the mantle to Dr. Gor.

BOT 3

“Reflecting back on AAPI’s progress over the last year, Dr. Sunil Kaza, the outgoing BOT Chair, said during the luncheon meeting, “Start of AAPI 2024-2025 term was like a storm, the likes of which, AAPI had never seen before !” Quoting Sadhguru, Dr. Kaza said, “You can learn to prevent the storm, or you can learn to ride the storm! If you can learn how to ride the storm, the storm is not a problem anymore. We decided to ride the storm! We decided to right the ship !,” and added, “Despite multiple and significant challenges, together with our EC, BOT and committee members, we have fulfilled our PROMISES.”

Highlighting some of the major initiatives under his leadership, Dr. Kaza said, “We provided scholarships through the Kakani educational scholarship for 2023-2024 and 2024-2025. For medical students, residents, and fellows, funds were secured and raised to support MSRF and their convention. For young physicians, funding was obtained to support YPS and their convention.”

For AAPI, Dr. Kaza said, BOT helped address various legal matters. We secured IMRA membership for AAPI and united Indian physicians regardless of their state of origin. We prioritized fiscal responsibility by minimizing social event expenses, and ensured AAPI elections followed ethical standards. Collaboration with the Executive Committee maintained transparency and continued a conservative approach to spending.”

Sunil Kaza

Regarding the activities from the US to India, Dr. Kaza referred to AAPI meeting with India’s Health Minister, Mr. JP Nada, to discuss improvements in emergency medicine care, including expanding education and increasing availability of EMT technicians. Discussions also focused on increasing residency seats in family and emergency medicine.

During his leadership, he said, AAPI sponsored research awards for GAIMS, supported its peer-reviewed journal, collaborated to promote HPV vaccination awareness and raise $45,000 for health and education initiatives in India, began work on the AAPI Global Foundation, raised $31,000 to support 62 tribal schools through Ekal Vidyalaya, and worked to obtain FCRA exemption for future charitable activities via the AAPI India Foundation.

Dr. Hetal Gor is a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist, is the president/Founder of Bergen Indian Medical Association , President /Founder of US chapter of FOGSI (Federation of OBGYN Society of India, and had served as the past President of the American Association of OBGYN of Indian Origin. Dr Gor is the Chair of North NJ chapter of the Indian American Women Entrepreneurs Association, and serves on the Board of Trustees of Bergen Performing Arts Center in Englewood, NJ, where she brings Indian art and artists to showcase Indian Heritage.

BOT

Dr. Gor shared with the audience, her TEN year journey in AAPI as co- Chair of NYC Covention in 2016 to the chairwoman of AAPI BOT. Dr.Gor described her plans for AAPI as the new Chair -Her plans in collaboration with the new Executive Committee led by Dr. Amit Chakrabarty.

“One thing that I’m very passionate about is knowledge , KNOWLEDGE IS POWER so starting this year a medical Legal monthly Zoom webinars ,this  will be in collaboration with SABA -South Asian Bar Association.”

Integrative medical wellness is another area Dr. Gor wants to focus on, she said. “This will help us have work work-life balance, tackle physician burnout, and a demanding, stressful work environment.”

“A well-balanced person is a better physician,” she said. Another area where AAPI plans to engage is organizing free health fairs and lecture sessions, educating the general public on common health issues that impact our communities.

“This year, we plan to implement and continue with the mentorship mentee program, guiding the junior physicians, medical student residents, alongside working with AMA,” Dr. Gor said. She promised financial stability, transparency, integrity, and hard work. “So, we’re going to make it a fun, entertaining, stress-free environment with positive vibrations, and everybody will be part of it.”

Feature and Cover Dr Hetal Gor Assumes Charge as AAPI BOT ChairDr. Satheesh Kathula, the outgoing President of AAPI lauded the support and guidance he received from Dr. Kaza and other members of the BOT, including the incoming BOT Chair, Dr. Gor. Expressing his gratitude to AAPI’s executive committee members, including  AAPI’s Convention committee chairs and members, volunteers and sponsors for their continued dedication and visionary leadership in their efforts to make this convention truly a historic one for all, Dr. Kathula, said. “The organizing committees have been working hard to make the AAPI Convention of 2025 rewarding and memorable for all.”

Announcing the recipients of the prestigious AAPI Service Awards, Dr. Uma Jonnalagadda, said,  “AAPI is glad to recognize and honor your accomplishments, hard work, dedication, and  contributions to the cause of AAPI.” Dr. Navin Nanda, Dr. P K Vedantham, Dr. Krishan Kumarm Dr. Jagdish Gupta, Dr. Ravi Parikh, and Dr. Avi Singh Gandhi were honored with the prestigious AAPI awards at the luncheon event. 

Dr. Sudhir Parikh, CEO of Parikh Media, shared with the audience his vision to share our heritage with the next generation of Indian origin people through his media platforms. He assured the audience of his collaboration and support for AAPI in reaching its message across the Indian American community. “It’s been an honor and privilege for me to be associated with AAPI because I recognize the tremendous role that is being played by AAPI in promoting friendship between India and the United States,” he said.

In his keynote address, Aftab Pureval, shared with the audience his life story as a child born to refugees from the Himalayas to the United States. “I’m the son of a refugee. My mom was born in Tibet, and she was forced to flee when the Communists took over. So my mom and my grandparents picked up, made their way through the Himalayas, through Nepal and into India. Against all odds, she made it to college by the grace of the support and generosity of the Indian government, where she met my father, who’s from Punjab, India. The young couple got married and decided to come to the United States.”

AAPI BOT 3

 Pureval went on to add, “I’m really proud of my parents story, and really proud of the fact, because the generations that came before you had to struggle and progress to create community. Had to take racism and xenophobia head on and nevertheless create community, whether it be religious or cultural or professional, in order to continue to thrive and grow in this country. My parents loved America even before they themselves were Americans. They loved the idea of the American dream, and they came here hard, and they achieved that dream for themselves, but also for their kids.”

 Referring to the flourishing community of Indian American Americans, Pureval said, “Our community is so drawn to healthcare, so drawn to helping others, so drawn to public service, so drawn to supporting the most vulnerable in our community. And it’s because of Trailblazers like you that next generations like me and my brother can pursue our dreams in whatever field that may be. Congratulations everybody so excited for you to choose Cincinnati and I hope you have a wonderful conference.”

 The growing influence of doctors of Indian heritage is evident, as increasingly physicians of Indian origin hold critical positions in the healthcare, academic, research and administrative positions across the nation. With their hard work, dedication, compassion, and skills, they have thus carved an enviable niche in the American medical community. AAPI’s role has come to be recognized as vital among members and among lawmakers. AAPI is also transitioning into a multiyear thinking and behavior by maintaining core continuity.

For more details, please visit:  www.aapiconvention.org   and www.aapiusa.org

Indian F-1 Visas Drop 44% in 2025; New Regions Rise

Fewer Indian students are heading to the United States in 2025, even as student visa numbers rise sharply in countries like Zimbabwe, Vietnam, and Pakistan.

Between October 2024 and March 2025, the United States issued nearly 89,000 F-1 student visas worldwide, marking a 15% decline compared to the same period in the previous year. This downward trend reflects a significant reshaping of international student inflows with a broader geographical spread, yet lower overall volumes.

Despite the overall reduction in F-1 student visas, specific regions have experienced sharp increases. Notably, there has been a surge in student visa issuance in countries such as Zimbabwe, Vietnam, and Pakistan, contrasting the decrease observed among Indian students.

The data released by the U.S. Department of State highlights this shift in trends, underscoring a diversifying pool of international applicants seeking educational opportunities in the United States.

The decline in the Indian student cohort seeking U.S. education is particularly noteworthy, given the traditionally high numbers of Indian students who pursue studies in American institutions. This change indicates evolving dynamics in global educational exchanges and the U.S. as an academic destination.

According to Business Today, these developments come amid broader global trends influencing international education and mobility, including geopolitical, economic, and policy factors that affect student decisions and institutional admissions.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Proposes Stricter Citizenship Test and H-1B Reforms

The Trump administration is set to introduce significant immigration reforms, targeting the H-1B visa program and the U.S. citizenship test, with plans to make both processes more challenging.

The Trump administration is preparing to implement a new wave of immigration reforms aimed at changing the visa system for skilled foreign workers and revising the citizenship test. Joseph Edlow, the newly appointed Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), detailed these plans in an interview with The New York Times, describing the existing citizenship evaluation as “easy.”

“The test as it’s laid out right now, it’s not very difficult. It’s very easy to kind of memorize the answers. I don’t think we’re really comporting with the spirit of the law,” Edlow stated during the interview on Thursday.

The proposed changes arise amid a broader crackdown on immigration during Trump’s second term, which has seen tightened visa rules and reduced refugee programs, affecting both documented and undocumented immigrants. The administration intends to reintroduce a stricter version of the citizenship test first seen during Trump’s initial term in office. Under the new format, applicants must correctly answer 12 out of 20 civics questions compared to the current requirement of 6 out of 10, thereby ensuring a deeper understanding of U.S. civics and governance beyond rote memorization.

Another key proposal involves restructuring the H-1B visa program, which serves skilled foreign workers. Edlow indicated that the USCIS plans to prioritize companies offering higher wages over the current lottery-based system. This revision would address criticism that companies exploit the system by hiring cheaper foreign labor, thus undercutting American workers.

Vice President JD Vance echoed these concerns, criticizing companies that lay off domestic workers while continuing to hire foreign workers. However, Edlow maintains, “I really do think that the way H-1B needs to be used… is to, along with a lot of other parts of immigration, supplement, not supplant, U.S. economy and U.S. businesses and U.S. workers.”

Despite the administration’s push, not everyone agrees with the proposed direction. Doug Rand, a former Biden official, cautioned that favoring higher-salary positions might undermine the original purpose of the H-1B program. “Like it or not, the H-1B program is the main way that U.S. companies can hire the best and brightest international graduates of U.S. universities,” Rand remarked to The New York Times. “Congress never allowed DHS to put its thumb on the scale based on salary.”

Edlow, who was confirmed by the Senate in July 2025, is anticipated to play a pivotal role in shaping immigration policy. With extensive experience in immigration enforcement and policy, stemming from his previous tenure at USCIS and the Justice Department, Edlow emphasized that immigration should serve as a national asset. “I think it absolutely should be a net positive,” he commented. “And if we’re looking at the people that are coming over… to advance certain economic agendas and otherwise benefit the national interest, that’s absolutely what we need to be taking care of.”

Though detailed policy documents outlining these reforms have not yet been disclosed, the USCIS has signaled a broader return to the rigorous approach seen during Trump’s first term. That era witnessed tightened green card eligibility rules and alterations to the asylum system, many of which faced legal challenges.

According to The New York Times, the tangible impact of these proposed changes on businesses and immigrants remains closely watched as the policies unfold.

UK-India Trade Deal to Boost Bilateral Trade by $34 Billion

The United Kingdom and India have inked a historic free trade agreement projected to bolster their bilateral trade by over $34 billion annually, significantly boosting both economies.

The free trade agreement (FTA), signed on Thursday in the presence of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, aims to enhance economic collaboration between the world’s fifth and sixth largest economies by reducing tariffs and expanding market access.

The finalized trade pact, which took three years of intense negotiations, addresses crucial issues like visas, tariff reductions, and tax breaks. The urgency to complete the agreement accelerated as global trade scenarios shifted with U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff policies stirring global markets.

Once fully implemented, the agreement is expected to raise the bilateral trade by £25.5 billion annually by 2040. In 2024, the trade in goods and services between the two nations stood at over £40 billion.

This deal, hailed as a significant achievement by both leaders, promises to provide expansive benefits such as boosting wages, raising living standards, and lowering consumer prices, according to Starmer. Modi praised the agreement as a “blueprint for shared prosperity,” emphasizing the increased access to the UK market for Indian goods such as textiles, jewelry, agricultural products, and engineering items.

The terms of the agreement allow for the elimination or reduction of tariffs on 92% of UK goods exported to India, while up to 99% of Indian goods shipped to Britain will benefit from tariff exemptions. This development is a crucial strategic win for India’s trade position, enhancing market access for sectors previously burdened by high tariffs and regulatory hurdles.

According to Dhiraj Nim, an economist at ANZ Bank, the agreement reflects a strategic triumph for New Delhi’s trade diplomacy, offering Indian goods significant advantages. The UK government anticipates a reduction in the weighted average tariffs on its exports to India from 15% to 3%. However, the agreement awaits ratification by both countries’ parliaments, expected to take several months.

Beyond tariff reductions, the pact includes provisions exempting Indian temporary workers in the UK from paying social security contributions for three years, potentially increasing India’s talent presence in the UK.

The FTA’s impact extends across multiple sectors. For instance, tariffs on UK scotch and gin will be halved from 150% to 75%, eventually dropping to 40% over a decade. Similarly, tariffs on brandy and rum will be initially cut to 110% and further reduced to 75%. The automotive industry will see duties decline to 10% within five years under a quota system, down from the current rates of up to 110%.

Before this agreement, UK goods faced an average duty of 14.6% in India, while Indian goods attracted a 4.2% duty rate, as estimated by Samiran Chakraborty, a Citi Bank economist. This trade pact is among the first signed by India with a developed economy, highlighting the UK’s role in 3% of India’s total goods trade last year, primarily machinery and equipment, followed by textiles and footwear.

Benefiting significant Indian sectors like textiles, gems, and jewelry, the deal is poised to support employment and promote industrial growth in India, noted Nim. As market access improves, India’s trade surplus with the UK could widen over time, though easing UK export barriers might help narrow this gap in the future.

“It is hard to say exactly which direction the surplus would go,” Nim stated, though a rise in overall trade volume is certain.

For both countries, the agreement offers leverage in ongoing negotiations with other trading partners, including the U.S., analysts suggest. Alicia Garcia Herrero, chief economist at Natixis Bank, noted this deal enhances both nations’ positions compared to the U.S.

As London continues to work out the details of its trade pact with the U.S. following an agreement in May, a potential meeting between Starmer and Trump is anticipated during the U.S. President’s personal visit to Scotland.

Economically, the deal is expected to contribute an additional £4.8 billion ($6.5 billion) each year to the UK’s economic output, which was £2.85 trillion in 2024. Modi views this agreement as a strategic opportunity to propel India’s trade discussions with other developed nations, aiming to position India as a competitive and viable trade partner.

As Sameep Shastri, vice president of the BRICS Chamber of Commerce and Industry, articulated on CNBC’s Inside India, the UK agreement signals India’s readiness to engage on equitable trade terms with Western powers, strengthening its global trade voice.

Meanwhile, India is rushing to finalize a trade deal with Washington before August 1 to avoid increased U.S. tariffs scheduled to rise to 26%.

UN Staff Union Declares No Confidence in Secretary-General

The UN Staff Union in Geneva has unanimously declared a vote of no confidence in the Secretary-General and the UN80 restructuring plan, citing concerns over transparency, job cuts, and organizational direction.

The United Nations is facing a growing internal backlash against its ambitious UN80 restructuring initiative. Staff unions are rallying against the plan, which has now sparked a vote of no confidence targeting UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and Under-Secretary-General Guy Ryder, the leader of the restructuring process.

On July 24, an Extraordinary General Assembly meeting held by the Staff Union Council in Geneva culminated in the adoption of a critical motion. Attended by nearly 600 staff members—well above the quorum of 200—the meeting’s participants unanimously expressed grave concerns over the UN80 plan, voicing distrust in the leadership charged with its roll-out.

UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq responded cautiously, reaffirming the organization’s commitment to engaging with staff representatives. “We remain committed, as we have been from the beginning of the UN80 Initiative, to consultation with staff representatives and engagement with them through the procedures in place for this purpose,” Haq stated. He further urged a collective approach to mitigate negative impacts and navigate the challenging reforms ahead for a more effective United Nations.

A memo from Laura Johnson, Executive Secretary, and Ian Richards, President of the Staff Union in Geneva, presented multiple reasons for the disenchantment. One major point of contention is the lack of vision and evaluation in the UN80 initiative, which critics claim has been hastily conducted. Staff unions also criticize budget proposals for 2026, which suggest cutting 20 percent of posts without evidence of crisis resolution, while contrasting this with other organizations maintaining zero-growth budgets.

The union’s memo also denounces the reinforcement of a top-heavy UN structure. Most job cuts are expected at junior levels, with no reductions at the Under-Secretaries-General level. Additionally, allegations have surfaced that Secretary-General Guterres has extended some USG contracts beyond his mandate, promoting personnel selectively while limiting others to a year to avoid indemnities during separations.

Additional apprehension stems from the decentralization proposal, which could increase long-term costs, and the indictment of staff for organizational failures, which may partially result from the UN’s dwindling visibility in peace and security matters.

The UNOG Staff Union intends to deliver the motion and its underlying concerns to the Secretary-General and subsequently to UN Member States. Staff members are also encouraged to voice their grievances through a survey conducted by the Coordination Committee for International Staff Unions and Associations (CCISUA), active until July 27, as well as direct correspondence with union representatives.

Simultaneously, the UN80 Initiative is progressing under the oversight of Guy Ryder, with a Task Force exploring three primary areas: enhancing efficiencies and improvements, mandate reviews mandated by Member States, and a strategic review of deeper, structural organizational changes. Secretary-General Guterres underscores the initiative’s broader implications, stressing that UN budgets impact lives across the globe.

The initiative’s core objectives focus on improved efficiency and effectiveness by streamlining operations and reducing costs while better aligning the UN’s operations with its mandates. Ongoing structural reforms may consolidate departments and agencies, aiming for a strategic realignment of the UN’s programs to current necessities and priorities.

The discontent among staff highlights the challenges of implementing organizational change in a complex, globally-distributed workforce, as internal opposition and the drive for reform continue to shape the trajectory of the UN80 initiative.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Stance Changes on Prosecuting Former Presidents

As President Donald Trump and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard seek to pacify their base over the Jeffrey Epstein files, they propose the idea of charging former President Barack Obama with treason for allegedly undermining Trump’s first presidency.

The suggestion by Trump and Gabbard involves allegations that Obama orchestrated false intelligence regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election to weaken Trump before assuming office. Despite the audacious claim, the primary challenge is the lack of evidence against Obama or other officials. Furthermore, even substantial evidence might clash with legal immunity afforded to former presidents.

Gabbard’s narrative suggests Obama engineered intelligence about Russian interference during the 2016 election to damage Trump. However, such claims are based on dubious interpretations and misleading information. Moreover, significant intelligence findings have been repeatedly validated, even by Republicans like Trump’s Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a crucial 2020 Senate report.

Besides evidentiary challenges, there’s the issue of whether Obama would be immune from prosecution—a situation paradoxically shaped by Trump himself. In 2024, Trump championed the notion that presidents should have extensive immunity from criminal charges, a stance upheld by the Supreme Court, potentially shielding Obama from any prosecution attempt.

Despite suggestions from Trump and Gabbard that Obama could face charges, Trump’s own legal team had previously argued against such actions, emphasizing the vital need for presidential immunity. Trump’s former personal lawyer, D. John Sauer, told the Supreme Court that without immunity from criminal prosecution, the presidency would be incapacitated.

Sauer went as far as positing that a president could make extreme decisions, like ordering the assassination of political opponents, without facing charges since such actions would fall under official presidential duties.

While the Supreme Court didn’t endorse this extreme interpretation, it did reinforce presidential immunity. This raises the question of whether such immunity would apply to Obama.

The Court concluded actions taken under a president’s core executive powers are immune. Furthermore, presidents possess presumed immunity for acts within their official responsibilities, which are not patently beyond their authority. However, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. established a high threshold for instances in which immunity wouldn’t apply.

The ruling’s implications are still debated, especially concerning Trump’s alleged actions related to the January 6 Capitol riot. Although these cases never reached trial after Trump’s election, prosecutors and judges continue to reassess valid evidence and charges.

Harvard law professor Richard Lazarus noted, “Assuming this nonsense is true, if Obama were acting in his official capacity in merely communicating with his intelligence folks about Russian interference, clear immunity.” But if Obama’s actions were personal, aiming to support Clinton’s campaign, immunity might not be so apparent.

Comparatively, it would be simpler for Obama to argue that the actions in question encompassed official duties, unlike Trump’s attempts to contest election results, which fall outside a president’s established role, typically managed by states.

In the eyes of Trump’s and Gabbard’s accusations, Obama was involved in creating intelligence reports. However, seeking intelligence falls under a president’s core responsibilities. Even if not, such actions remain within the “outer perimeter” of official duties, where overcoming immunity is challenging.

UCLA law professor Rick Hasen noted “Communicating with intelligence officials would seem to fall into the scope of official duties.” Yet, theoretical charges would face a major hurdle due to the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States, precluding the use of official acts as criminal evidence.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, during a press briefing, repeatedly deferred on whether immunity applied to Obama. “I’ll leave that to the Department of Justice,” she remarked.

Overall, while the situation appears academic, it remains highly speculative that Trump and his Justice Department would pursue prosecuting Obama. Historically, Trump’s claims often dissipate. However, media coverage, more focused on Obama allegations than the Epstein files, indicates a potential temporary diversion strategy.

This juxtaposition is striking. Trump’s legal position argued for comprehensive presidential immunity as essential for executive functions. Yet, he suggests abandoning those standards for his predecessor’s more official-seeming actions.

According to Trump’s legal rationale, Obama could arguably have taken far more drastic actions than adjusting intelligence reports, potentially without consequence.

Source: Original article

India’s Economy to Reach Third Largest Globally by 2028: Report

India is projected to become the world’s third-largest economy by 2028, with its GDP expected to exceed $10 trillion by 2035, driven by key states reaching significant economic milestones, according to a report by Morgan Stanley.

India is on the path to becoming the third-largest economy in the world by 2028, with its gross domestic product (GDP) anticipated to more than double to $10.6 trillion by 2035. This forecast comes from a recent report by Morgan Stanley released on July 23.

The financial services firm’s analysis suggests that India’s growth will be significantly influenced by its states, with Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, and Karnataka expected to reach the $1 trillion economic milestone in the coming years.

Currently, the leading states include Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Telangana, according to Morgan Stanley. Additionally, Chhattisgarh, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh have shown substantial improvements in their economic rankings over the past five years.

The report highlights that India is poised to contribute approximately 20 percent to global growth in the near future, thereby elevating the earnings potential for major multinational corporations operating in the region.

In its latest bi-monthly monetary policy review, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) maintained its GDP growth forecast for the fiscal year 2026 at 6.5 percent. This outlook comes after increased central government expenditure on infrastructure, which has risen to 3.2 percent of the GDP for fiscal year 2025, compared to 1.6 percent in fiscal year 2015.

According to Moneycontrol, these infrastructural investments and the economic dynamism at the state level are pivotal to India’s projected economic ascent.

Source: Original article

Youth Event Promotes Global Peacebuilding Efforts

The Jubilee of Youth, a pivotal event within the Jubilee Year of Hope, will welcome young people from around the globe in a celebration aimed at fostering peace and unity.

The Jubilee Year of Hope continues its series of events with the much-anticipated Jubilee of Influencers and the Jubilee of Youth, scheduled from July 28 to August 3. Archbishop Rino Fisichella, Pro-Prefect of the Dicastery for Evangelization, has highlighted the multicultural and diverse nature of these celebrations, designed to unite young minds from across the world in the Eternal City.

Youth from 146 countries will converge on Rome, with the majority – 78% – arriving from European nations. The remaining 22% consists of young people from various parts of the world, including countries experiencing conflict such as Iraq, South Sudan, and Lebanon. Archbishop Fisichella emphasized that these gatherings are not just moments of celebration but significant steps toward peace worldwide, offering a communal embrace as a gesture of solidarity and hope.

Expected to draw at least half a million participants, the gathering will see 370 churches, 400 school buildings, gyms, and numerous families open their doors to accommodate the influx of young visitors. The city is meticulously prepared, with 20 strategically placed food stations and 3,500 vendors ensuring that everyone is well-fed, including those requiring celiac-friendly options.

The Jubilee will kick off with “Dialogue with the City,” featuring 70 events over three days from Tuesday to Thursday in various Roman squares. Diverse groups, associations, and bishops’ conferences will host these events. Highlights include the Duc in Altum theatre group’s street performances on the life of St. Therese of Lisieux and Caritas Internationalis’ interactive exhibits showcasing their mission work. Mary’s Meals will be on hand to discuss their efforts to combat poverty worldwide. The day will culminate in a welcoming Mass in St. Peter’s Square at 7 p.m.

Friday, August 1, has been designated for the sacrament of confession. The historic Circus Maximus will host around 200 priests in tents, offering the penitent young people a day of spiritual reflection.

On the evening of Saturday, August 2, Tor Vergata, the site of World Youth Day 2000, will host one of the grandest events. Here, Pope Leo XIV will join the multitude for a prayer vigil, during which he will engage with the youth through questions posed by representatives from Mexico, the United States, and Italy.

The Jubilee of Youth will conclude with a Mass led by Pope Leo XIV on Sunday, August 3, bringing the week of faith, fun, and friendships to a resonant close.

According to Vatican News, this series of events marks both a celebration of youth and a step forward in the global quest for peace.

Dr. Reddy’s to Launch Generic Obesity Drugs in 87 Countries

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories plans to launch a generic version of Novo Nordisk’s popular weight-loss drug Wegovy in 87 countries next year, focusing initially on emerging markets.

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, an India-based pharmaceutical company, announced plans to introduce a generic version of Novo Nordisk’s blockbuster weight-loss medication, Wegovy, to 87 countries in the following year. This strategic move, disclosed by CEO Erez Israeli, signals the company’s ambitions to capture a significant portion of the burgeoning global obesity drug market, projected to be worth approximately $150 billion by the early 2030s.

Initially, Dr. Reddy’s intends to release its generic semaglutide version—the active component in Wegovy and the diabetes treatment Ozempic—in countries such as Canada, India, Brazil, and Turkey, among various other emerging markets. This rollout is contingent upon the expiration of relevant patents, Israeli highlighted during a press conference discussing the firm’s earnings. He further noted that while the U.S. and European markets would open to these generics later, full access to other Western markets was expected between 2029 and 2033.

The company anticipates that sales of their generic drug will generate “hundreds of millions of dollars,” according to Israeli. The patent for semaglutide is expected to expire in multiple countries, including India in March of next year. Notably, in May, Novo Nordisk filed a lawsuit against Dr. Reddy’s, alleging infringement of its semaglutide patent, according to documents reviewed by Reuters.

Dr. Reddy’s has already submitted the necessary regulatory applications in all countries where it plans to launch the generic version. This aggressive expansion strategy aligns with broader industry trends, as several Indian pharmaceutical companies—including Cipla, Lupin, Biocon, and Sun Pharma—also aim to launch generic weight-loss medications, mirroring the success of Novo and its U.S. competitor, Eli Lilly.

Recently, Novo launched Wegovy in India, closely following Eli Lilly’s introduction of Mounjaro for weight-loss and diabetes management. Both Wegovy and Mounjaro belong to a class of drugs known as GLP-1 receptor agonists, which help manage blood sugar levels and slow digestion, contributing to prolonged feelings of satiety.

In addition to Wegovy’s generic, Dr. Reddy’s aims to launch 26 other GLP-1 drugs over the next decade as part of its long-term strategy, Israeli revealed. This expansion indicates the company’s proactive approach in capitalizing on the rapidly growing segment of obesity and diabetes treatments.

These developments underscore Dr. Reddy’s commitment to broadening its footprint in the global pharmaceutical market while addressing the escalating demand for affordable obesity medications.

GENIUS Act Enables Stablecoin Adoption via Mastercard

Mastercard stands poised to play a pivotal role in the burgeoning stablecoin ecosystem following the passage of the GENIUS Act, which ushers in a new era of regulatory clarity for digital assets with significant potential for global adoption.

On July 18, President Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law, providing a regulatory framework for stablecoins. This development closely followed Mastercard’s announcement regarding its future role in the regulated cryptocurrency space. Mastercard views the legislation as the start of “a new era of regulatory clarity and confidence in digital assets,” according to a company article titled “Stablecoins are taking center stage,” authored by Jesse McWaters, Executive Vice President and Head of Global Policy at Mastercard.

McWaters emphasizes the importance of regulatory frameworks in other regions, such as Europe’s Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA), and similar legislation in Hong Kong, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates. These measures create a secure environment for digital assets, bolster trust, and stimulate innovation that yields real-world benefits. According to McWaters, stablecoins already enhance the financial experiences of content creators and gig workers by offering a quicker and cheaper remittance method compared to traditional payment tools. Still, he notes that stablecoins must be integrated within a trusted system, a role he believes Mastercard is well-suited to fulfill.

Highlighting Mastercard’s history of involvement in pioneering technologies, McWaters suggests the company has long been preparing for the time when stablecoins assume a central role. Mastercard aims to establish a compliance-first ecosystem that allows stablecoins to scale safely, seamlessly integrating them into the global financial system without losing the unique advantages of cryptocurrencies, such as flexibility and convenience. Key projects like the Mastercard Multi-Token Network and Mastercard Crypto Credential are instrumental in this vision, and the company’s global partnerships are poised to support a smooth user experience.

McWaters cites recent favorable crypto regulations in several countries as a gateway to an innovative future, a path that Mastercard is eager to pursue. To make cryptocurrencies as user-friendly as traditional currency, Mastercard is developing solutions such as the Mastercard Crypto Credential. This human-readable credential aims to simplify user experiences by replacing complex blockchain addresses with easily manageable credentials, specifically targeting crypto exchanges and everyday users to facilitate smoother interactions.

Another significant Mastercard initiative is the Multi-Token Network, a business-to-business platform designed to facilitate crypto transactions between financial institutions and companies, reflecting the ongoing trend of tokenizing assets. This platform is available 24/7 for both financial institutions and application providers, providing constant access to crypto transactions.

Mastercard’s collaboration with MoonPay, a platform specializing in crypto on- and off-ramps, aims to integrate Mastercard-branded cards with crypto wallets. This partnership, which was announced in May and involved a brainstorming session earlier in the month, will allow cardholders to use stablecoins at locations accepting Mastercard. The objective is to fundamentally transform payments and the very nature of money itself, a move referred to by MoonPay CEO Ivan Soto-Wright as “backwards compatibility,” as it extends the use of crypto beyond its initial applications.

Regarding regulations, Mastercard acknowledges the various legislative efforts around the world, including the American GENIUS Act, European MiCA, Singaporean Payment Services Act, UAE’s Law No. (4) of 2022, and Hong Kong’s drafted ASPIRe legislation. These regulations support the legal use of stablecoins, mitigating the constraints of restrictive securities laws while implementing protective measures to combat money laundering and other illicit activities. It appears that Mastercard was awaiting federal-level crypto adoption in the U.S. before expanding its crypto acceptance aggressively.

However, the GENIUS Act has not been universally well-received in the U.S. Some Democrats argue that while the legislation includes certain protections, it lacks mechanisms to prevent the misuse of cryptocurrencies by top officials for corrupt purposes. Nevertheless, Mastercard appears determined not to let such concerns impede their progress toward mass adoption of digital assets.

India’s Economy Steady Despite Global Uncertainties, Central Bank Reports

India’s economy remains resilient despite global geopolitical tensions and trade uncertainties, according to the Reserve Bank of India.

India’s economy is showing signs of resilience against the backdrop of global fluctuations, as the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) elaborated in its monthly bulletin released on Wednesday. The central bank highlighted India’s ability to withstand international challenges, such as geopolitical tensions and trade uncertainties.

Last month, the RBI made a significant move by reducing its key policy rate by an unexpected 50 basis points and lowering the cash reserve ratio for banks. These changes were possible due to low inflation, which offered the bank the flexibility to prioritize growth amid unpredictable global conditions. India’s economic activity has remained steady, the bulletin noted, supported by favorable prospects for summer-sown crops, robust momentum in the services sector, and moderate growth in industrial activity.

The report also pointed out that “high-frequency indicators suggest stability in aggregate demand,” signaling a positive outlook for India’s economic prospects. Retail inflation in the country dropped to 2.10% in June, marking a six-year low and further contributing to positive economic sentiment.

Additional factors propelling economic stability included “de-escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and optimism on trade deals,” as well as a relaxation in regulatory norms for infrastructure financing, which collectively improved financial market sentiment in the latter part of June.

Despite these optimistic indicators, the bulletin also highlighted that domestic investor sentiment was cautious in the first half of July. This caution was attributed to ongoing uncertainty over a potential trade agreement between India and the United States and mixed corporate earnings for the quarter ending in June.

The RBI’s insights into India’s economic resilience underscore the country’s ability to navigate complex international challenges while maintaining domestic stability and growth.

Dalai Lama Inaugurates KarGön Mega Summer Symposium

Amidst a backdrop of inclement weather and eager anticipation, His Holiness the Dalai Lama inaugurated the prestigious Kargon Mega Summer Symposium in Zanskar, Ladakh, to the delight of thousands who gathered to extend their heartfelt welcome.

After a two-day delay due to poor weather conditions that hindered travel between Leh and Zanskar, His Holiness the Dalai Lama managed to arrive in Padum by helicopter. Upon his arrival, he was warmly received at the helipad by the locals of Zanskar and formally welcomed by key officials including the District Commissioner of Kargil, Rakesh Kumar, the Senior Superintendent of Police, and three councillors from the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council.

His Holiness expressed his gratitude to the helicopter’s pilot and copilot for a comfortable journey and posed for photographs with them. He then traveled by car to the newly established Karsha Phodrang (KarGön Palace), where thousands of admirers lined the route, joyfully welcoming the revered leader with smiles and waves.

The Chief Executive Councilor of the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council, Tashi Gyalson, joined the gathering at the temple, paying respects to the Tulkus before taking his seat. Traditional sounds of horns, drums, and cymbals announced the arrival of the Dalai Lama, who was welcomed by the Abbot of Karsha Monastery, Sonam Dorje, and was invited to inaugurate the new building with prayers and a ceremonial tossing of grain.

The event was marked by a verse of welcome expressing the hope for happiness and longevity for His Holiness. Prominent religious figures, including Thiksey Rinpoché and the Sharpa Chöjé Rinpoché, were in attendance, further highlighting the significance of the occasion.

Geshe Losang Tsephel, Chair of the Organizing Committee of the Summer Mega Symposium, praised His Holiness for gracing the event and acknowledged the support of the council and the Kargil DC. The symposium’s educational mission aligns with His Holiness’s advice for monastic and secular institutions to actively engage with classic texts.

As part of their curriculum, schoolchildren in the region are now regularly studying ‘mind and awareness,’ along with ‘logic and reasoning,’ underscoring the symposium’s broader educational impact.

Rakesh Kumar, the Kargil District Commissioner, addressed the audience, extending his respects to His Holiness and commendations to the symposium’s participants. During a demonstration, students showcased their debating skills, highlighting lessons learned from seminal texts such as Nagarjuna’s ‘Root Wisdom.’

The morning’s formalities concluded with participants and guests receiving blessings from the Dalai Lama, after which he spoke to the assembly about his enduring commitment to the teachings of Buddhism, emphasizing the utility of logic and reason within the tradition.

His Holiness reflected on his personal journey from Tibet, the challenges posed by Chinese governance, and the resilience shown by preserving Buddhist traditions in exile. His insights illuminated how logical and reasoned approaches can enhance both religious study and broader understanding.

The Dalai Lama’s address resonated with attendees, and children from the Rainbow School celebrated by performing songs in his honor, underscoring their gratitude for his presence at the inauguration of the new Karsha Phodrang.

Zanskari women, donned in traditional attire, added to the festivities through song and dance, celebrating the cultural richness of the region.

The event concluded with words of thanks from the chief organizer, who acknowledged the efforts made and funds raised to realize the vision of the Karsha Phodrang, emphasizing the collective gratitude toward His Holiness for his invaluable presence and support.

According to Tibet.net, the day’s proceedings were an embodiment of unity and cultural pride, enriched by the Dalai Lama’s teachings.

USA Takes Second in 66th International Mathematical Olympiad

The United States team, sponsored by the Mathematical Association of America, has secured second place in the 66th International Mathematical Olympiad, earning five gold medals and one silver in the highly competitive event held in Australia.

The United States team achieved an outstanding performance at the 66th International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO), hosted on the Sunshine Coast of Australia from July 10 to July 20, 2025. Sponsored by the Mathematical Association of America (MAA), the team earned second place overall, with an impressive score of 216 points.

The IMO is renowned as the world’s premier mathematics competition for high school students, attracting young mathematicians from every corner of the globe. In this year’s edition, 110 countries were represented by 630 students, all competing to solve six challenging mathematical problems.

Of the six talented members of the US team, five secured gold medals while one won a silver, highlighting their exceptional problem-solving skills. Notably, team members Tiger Zhang and Alexander Wang ranked in the top ten individual scorers, underscoring the level of their mathematical prowess.

Comprising the 2025 USA IMO team were: Hannah Fox, 17, from California; Karn Chutinan, 18, from Massachusetts; Andrew Lin, 18, from New Jersey; Alexander Wang, 17, also from New Jersey; Qiao (Tiger) Zhang, 17, from California; and Ruilin (Calvin) Wang, 17, from Virginia.

Hannah Fox’s participation is especially significant, marking the second consecutive year a young woman was included in the USA IMO team. Her achievement was further celebrated with the Maryam Mirzakhani medal, awarded to the top female scorer in the Americas region.

The team benefited from expert guidance under head coach John Berman and deputy coach Yang Liu. Both played crucial roles in the intense training regimen at the MAA Mathematical Olympiad Summer Program, preparing the students for the rigors of international competition.

Students aspiring to join the USA IMO team must first succeed in a series of competitions organized by the MAA American Mathematics Competitions. These events are part of a broader initiative that sees roughly 300,000 K-12 students from over 6,000 schools and learning centers participating annually.

The success of this year’s team was generously supported by Jane Street, which contributed resources to facilitate the team’s journey to the Olympiad.

Further details about the MAA American Mathematics Competitions, including information on hosting a competition or getting involved, can be found through the formal channels of the MAA.

This remarkable achievement at the 66th International Mathematical Olympiad underscores the dedication and skill of the US team, reinforcing their position as leaders on the global stage in mathematical challenges.

Obama Responds to Trump’s Call for Prosecution

In an unusual move, former President Barack Obama has publicly refuted allegations by Donald Trump that he attempted to orchestrate a coup following Trump’s 2016 election victory.

Barack Obama has stepped forward to confront accusations made by Donald Trump, who claimed that the former president orchestrated a coup against him after the 2016 presidential election. Obama’s office issued a rare and emphatic statement dismissing Trump’s allegations as “outrageous” and “a weak attempt at distraction.”

The statement was released after Trump alleged that Obama was guilty of treason for purportedly leading an effort to fabricate evidence of Russian interference in the election. This accusation was part of Trump’s comments during a meeting at the White House with Ferdinand Marcos Jr., the president of the Philippines and son of the country’s former autocratic leader.

“Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,” the statement from Obama’s office read. “But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.”

The controversy escalated following an 11-page document released by Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence. The document claimed there was a “treasonous conspiracy” among Obama-era national security officials, and recommended their prosecution.

Obama’s office responded by highlighting the conclusions of several intelligence assessments that found Russia did influence the 2016 election, but did not manipulate vote tallies. The findings, originally supported by a 2020 report from the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio, maintained that Russia’s interference aimed to damage Hillary Clinton’s campaign, not alter voting results.

The Gabbard report suggested otherwise, claiming that Obama’s administration had coerced intelligence agencies to modify their conclusions. The report conflated different issues in an attempt to undermine the intelligence community’s assessment, made public in 2017, which indicated Russian efforts to help Trump while harming Clinton.

During the White House meeting, Trump accused Obama as the leader of this supposed conspiracy, implicating other officials such as James Comey, the former FBI director, and James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence. He described the alleged actions as treasonous and accused Obama of attempting to “steal” and “obfuscate” the election.

Trump also mentioned that Gabbard had assured him that more documents would soon be available. However, critics have pointed out that the report misrepresented crucial aspects of the assessments and failed to alter the core finding that Russia intervened in the election.

A former CIA analyst, Fulton Armstrong, criticized Gabbard’s report, stating that it was crafted to reach a predetermined conclusion. Armstrong described the document as sloppy and manipulative, dismissing references to so-called “deep state officials” as amateurish and weakening the report’s credibility.

Assertions of Russian interference were further corroborated by special counsel Robert Mueller’s 2019 report and the bipartisan Senate intelligence committee’s report led by Marco Rubio the following year. Despite this, Gabbard’s document attempted to discredit these findings through misleading comparisons and conclusions.

According to The Guardian, the document used language that confused confidence levels with probability in intelligence assessments to present a one-sided narrative intended to support its claims.

Source: Original article

US Withdraws from UNESCO Again Under Trump’s Leadership

President Donald Trump has announced the United States will withdraw from UNESCO, the U.N. cultural and education agency, repeating a decision he made during his first term.

President Donald Trump has announced that the United States will exit the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) at the end of 2025, marking the second time he has taken such a step. The decision echoes his actions during his first term, which were later reversed by former President Joe Biden.

The White House explained the departure as part of the Trump administration’s “America first” foreign policy, expressing skepticism toward multilateral organizations such as the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, and NATO. White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly criticized UNESCO for supporting “woke” and “divisive” cultural causes that clash with what she termed “commonsense policies” favored by American voters.

The State Department further accused UNESCO of promoting a “globalist, ideological agenda” that is inconsistent with the Trump administration’s foreign policy. A significant point of contention was UNESCO’s 2011 decision to admit the Palestinians as a member state, which the U.S. deemed problematic and contributing to anti-Israel sentiment.

UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay expressed regret over the U.S. decision but noted the organization was prepared for the possibility. She emphasized that UNESCO had diversified its funding sources, with the U.S. providing only about 8% of its budget.

French President Emmanuel Macron reaffirmed strong support for UNESCO, calling it a “universal protector” of world heritage, while condemning the U.S. decision as a blow to multilateralism.

UNESCO officials indicated that the U.S. withdrawal is expected to have a limited impact on U.S.-funded programs. However, Israel welcomed Washington’s move, with U.N. ambassador Danny Danon criticizing UNESCO for perceived biases against Israel. Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar thanked the U.S. for its “moral support and leadership” in addressing what he described as the politicization and singling out of Israel within U.N. agencies.

Conversely, U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a senior Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, labeled Trump’s decision as “short-sighted” and warned it could bolster China’s influence, which grew within UNESCO after Trump’s initial withdrawal.

Azoulay asserted that the issues cited by the U.S. for its withdrawal were outdated and failed to recognize UNESCO’s efforts in promoting Holocaust education and countering antisemitism. She described the organization as a rare forum for multilateralism focused on consensus and action.

UNESCO, established after World War II to foster peace through international cooperation in education, science, and culture, is renowned for designating World Heritage Sites. In the U.S., designated sites include the Grand Canyon and the Statue of Liberty, among others. The agency highlights 1,248 global locations of “outstanding universal value.”

The U.S. has had a complex history with UNESCO, having first withdrawn in 1984 under President Ronald Reagan amid accusations of financial mismanagement and anti-U.S. bias. The U.S. rejoined in 2003 under President George W. Bush, though funding was halted in 2011 following UNESCO’s vote to grant full membership to the Palestinians. Trump’s first term saw another withdrawal in 2017 over accusations of anti-Israeli bias, a decision reversed by Biden in 2023.

Source: Original article

US Food Insecurity Doubles Since 2021 Amid Economic Disparity Concerns

Amid economic prosperity, an increasing number of Americans are battling food insecurity, with recent data revealing that 15.6% of U.S. adults lacked sufficient food sometime in May, almost double from 2021.

The United States, despite being an economic powerhouse, faces a growing challenge as more citizens struggle to afford basic necessities like food. This alarming trend has been brought to light by new findings from Morning Consult, reported by Axios, which show a significant rise in the number of U.S. adults experiencing food scarcity.

In May, 15.6% of adults in the U.S. reported they sometimes or often did not have enough to eat, marking a nearly 100% increase from two years ago. Back in 2021, expanded benefits such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and an enhanced Child Tax Credit contributed to improving food access. However, the rollback of these supports has coincided with worsening food security for many.

John Leer, Chief Economist at Morning Consult, highlighted the widening gap between flourishing financial markets and the reality many Americans face daily. “There’s such a disconnect now between record highs on Wall Street and elevated levels of food insecurity,” Leer remarked in the report.

Philadelphia’s Share Food Program, a significant food bank network in the area, has observed a 120% surge in demand for food over the past three years. Program Director George Matysik noted that the need began rising as federal aid started decreasing in 2022. He expressed concern that the recent SNAP cuts approved by Congress could further exacerbate the situation. The Urban Institute’s research suggests that the reconciliation package could cause 22.3 million families to lose all or part of their SNAP benefits.

The spike in food insecurity accompanies a broader increase in living costs. Food prices, according to the Consumer Price Index, have climbed 26% over the last five years, with the USDA anticipating a further 2.9% rise in 2025. Inflation isn’t limited to groceries, affecting everything from rent to utilities and transportation, thereby eroding purchasing power for many households.

To combat rising costs, consumers are urged to be vigilant with their budgets. Reducing major expenses, such as car insurance, by comparing various options can help ease financial strains. Forbes reports the average cost of full-coverage auto insurance as $2,149 per year, though significant savings can be found by comparing quotes from different insurers.

Technological solutions like the Upside cash-back app provide additional avenues for savings, enabling users to earn cash-back on essential purchases like gas, groceries, and dining. Such strategies assist in managing the impact of inflation on household finances.

Investors concerned with protecting their assets from inflation often turn to traditional safeguards such as gold. Unlike fiat currency, gold cannot be produced in unlimited quantities and is viewed as a stable investment during economic uncertainties. Over the past year, gold prices have surged over 35%, emphasizing its value as an investment.

Financial expert Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, the world’s largest hedge fund, acknowledged gold’s role in a well-rounded investment portfolio, calling it an “effective diversifier” during economic downturns. Investors looking for tax advantages can consider opening a gold IRA through services like Priority Gold, which facilitate holding physical gold within retirement accounts.

Real estate also remains a popular hedge against inflation. As property values and rental incomes often rise with inflation, real estate investments can provide a reliable income stream. The S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index reports a more than 50% increase over the last five years, reflecting the sector’s resilience.

Crowdfunding platforms, such as Arrived, now offer easy access to the real estate market, allowing investors to purchase shares in rental properties with relatively small investments. Supported by high-profile investors like Jeff Bezos, Arrived simplifies the process by letting users select pre-vetted properties to invest in, offering an opportunity for income generation without the traditional burdens of property ownership.

This multifaceted approach to managing personal finances amid economic challenges provides a roadmap for maintaining stability and growth, even as larger structural inequities persist.

According to Axios, these revelations underline a critical disconnect between financial indices and the lived realities of millions of Americans grappling with basic needs.

Source: Original article

Winnie Varghese Becomes First Woman Dean of St. John’s

The Rev. Winnie Varghese has become the first woman elected to lead the Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine in New York City, marking a significant milestone for diversity and inclusion within the Episcopal Church.

The announcement of Varghese’s appointment as dean was marked by her emotional moment on the steps of the historic cathedral, a place that has loomed large in her imagination since her childhood in Dallas. Reflecting on her new role, Varghese expressed her awe at the responsibility and the vision she holds for the church community.

“What a beautiful responsibility it is to have to think about how to care for people and how to care for community,” Varghese remarked during an interview on July 14. Her involvement with the cathedral began with its evocative depiction in a local newspaper article she read at age 12, which introduced her to its vibrant St. Francis Day celebration.

Varghese officially assumed her new role as dean on July 1, becoming the first woman to lead the largest Episcopal cathedral in the U.S. The appointment of Varghese, a queer woman of Indian descent, signifies the Episcopal Church’s ongoing commitment to progressive values, particularly regarding LGBTQ inclusion and racial justice.

A prominent voice in support of marginalized communities, Varghese has been active in advocating for LGBTQ+ rights and racial equality and has served as a rector in New York City and Atlanta. Her leadership qualities are well recognized, reflecting the Episcopal Church’s intention to widen its embrace of diversity.

The Rev. Kelly Brown Douglas, who co-chaired the search committee for the dean, hailed Varghese as a trailblazer. Douglas emphasized the impact of Varghese’s competence and strength, stating that her leadership would break new grounds for the church.

Prior to her appointment as dean, Varghese served as rector of St. Luke’s Episcopal Church in Atlanta. Her journey in ministry has been marked by firsts and challenges, stepping into roles typically not envisioned for a queer woman of color within the church. According to statistics from the Church Pension Group from 2011 to 2021, only a small fraction of Episcopal priests were women of color.

The journey has come with unexpected hurdles. Varghese recalled past struggles in embracing her identity within the church, further underscoring the significance of her current role. Ordained in 2000, she has been a pioneering figure, reshaping traditional perceptions and practices within her communities.

The position of dean at St. John the Divine is not without challenges, as Varghese steps into her role during a politically charged environment in New York. Issues such as immigration policies and declining church attendance weigh heavily on religious leaders across the city. Varghese is familiar with these challenges, having previously addressed them in her role at St. Mark’s Church in-the-Bowery.

Her approach involves fostering a sense of outreach and welcome, encouraging parishioners to engage with their broader community. The vision of church as an inclusive, inviting space is core to her leadership philosophy as she takes on the task of revitalizing the cathedral’s congregational life.

The Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine, with its storied history intertwined with New York City’s cultural landscape, seeks to continue its tradition of being a hub for music, art, and social engagement. It has been a venue for various artistic presentations, from contemporary art installations to music performances.

In her role, Varghese will also oversee the upkeep of the cathedral’s expansive and unfinished structure. Significant projects, such as the $4 million restoration of the cathedral’s west wall, are underway. Varghese is committed to sustaining the physical and spiritual vibrancy of the cathedral, inviting supporters to invest in its mission.

Her ultimate goal is to continue building on the legacy of St. John the Divine, ensuring the cathedral remains a space of reflection, tradition, and opportunity. On September 27, Varghese will be formally installed as the dean, followed by leading the annual St. Francis Day Blessing of the Animals, embodying the cathedral’s tradition of openness and celebration.

Earth’s Spin on July 22 Creates 2nd-Shortest Day in History

On Tuesday, July 22, Earth will complete its rotation 1.34 milliseconds faster than usual, marking one of the shortest days in recorded history.

Earth’s rotation on July 22 will fall short of the standard 24-hour day by a mere 1.34 milliseconds. While this variance is too slight to be noticed in daily life, it forms part of a curious trend in Earth’s rotational dynamics that has emerged over the past few years. Some scientists suggest that, if this pattern persists, a negative leap second could become necessary around the year 2029—a correction unprecedented in atomic clockkeeping.

The planet’s rotation speed has never been constant. Historical data indicate that a day was much shorter in the distant past than the 86,400 seconds we are familiar with today. A 2023 study revealed that, for a significant period in Earth’s early history, each day lasted approximately 19 hours. This shift resulted from influences such as solar atmospheric tides and lunar ocean tides. Over extensive geological timescales, tidal friction from the moon has emerged as the primary factor gradually elongating Earth’s days. As the moon moves further away, it exerts less gravitational pull, effectively draining Earth’s rotational energy and slowing its spin rate.

Since the advent of the atomic clock in 1973, the shortest recorded day was just 1.05 milliseconds less than 24 hours, according to data from Timeanddate.com. Remarkably, since 2020, Earth has consistently set new records for rotational speed. Specifically, on July 5, 2024, Earth’s spin concluded 1.66 milliseconds sooner than typical, making it the shortest day documented thus far.

Current scientific forecasts for 2025 identified July 9, July 22, and August 5 as potential candidates for the year’s shortest days. Nonetheless, recent measurements now place July 10 in the lead, with a reduction of 1.36 milliseconds from the normal 24-hour period. On July 22, Earth’s rotation is anticipated to end 1.34 milliseconds early, clinching the position for the second-shortest day of the year in 2025. If existing trends persist, August 5 is expected to end roughly 1.25 milliseconds sooner than usual.

There is emerging evidence suggesting that this acceleration may be slowing. Preliminary observations indicate a deceleration in the rate at which day lengths are decreasing, but the root cause of the recent rotational modifications remains largely unknown. A 2024 study proposed that factors like polar ice melt and rising sea levels might be impacting Earth’s rotation by altering mass distribution. However, these factors may not be primary drivers of the acceleration. Another plausible explanation points toward influences deep within Earth: the deceleration of its liquid core could be redistributing angular momentum, causing the mantle and crust to spin slightly faster.

Leonid Zotov, an expert on Earth rotation from Moscow State University, commented on the mystery of this acceleration to Timeanddate.com. “Most scientists believe it is something inside the Earth. Ocean and atmospheric models don’t explain this huge acceleration.” Zotov also predicts that Earth’s rotation could slow again soon. If his prediction holds true, this quickening might merely represent a transient deviation in Earth’s long-term trajectory toward slower rotation and elongated days.

CBO: GOP Bill Adds $3.4T Deficit, 10M Lose Insurance

President Donald Trump’s megabill, signed on July 4, is projected to increase the federal deficit by $3.4 trillion and result in 10 million people losing health insurance over the next decade, according to a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report.

The CBO released its final analysis on Monday, detailing the impact of the newly enacted legislation on the national debt and U.S. households. The structure of the bill, primarily a permanent extension of the 2017 tax cuts, is expected to significantly reduce incoming federal revenue while contributing to a marked increase in the deficit. The bill was a key legislative achievement for President Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress.

The primary driver of the mounting deficit is the GOP’s decision to maintain the tax cuts from Trump’s first term, which the Senate Finance Committee projects will decrease tax revenue by approximately $4.5 trillion. This figure also incorporates additional GOP-backed tax cuts that were introduced during the Senate floor debates.

The CBO’s report indicates that while the legislation will cut more than $1 trillion in federal healthcare spending—with the majority of cuts targeting Medicaid—the savings will not offset the costs of the package. The anticipated increase in the deficit highlights the imbalance between the package’s financial outflow and the savings from health expenditure reductions.

Additionally, the CBO predicts that 10 million people will lose their health insurance as a result of these legislative changes. This estimation marks a slight improvement from prior figures, which predicted that 11.8 million people would lose coverage. The updated numbers reflect the removal of a previous policy that would have caused an estimated 1.4 million undocumented immigrants to lose health insurance.

The CBO also provided additional insights into the bill’s impact on agricultural policies. Negotiations spearheaded by Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska led to a softening of initial requirements that would have compelled states to bear more costs related to SNAP, a key U.S. food assistance program. These modifications, along with cuts to federal agriculture spending, are projected to result in $120 billion in savings over the coming decade.

The bill initially contained provisions aimed at penalizing states that offer healthcare to undocumented immigrants, despite federal prohibitions on Medicaid coverage for this demographic. However, due to objections from the Senate parliamentarian, a controversial element that would have withdrawn funding from states that expanded Medicaid under the Democrats’ 2010 health law was removed from the final version.

In an alternate analysis requested by Senate Republicans, the CBO used a new accounting method that does not factor in the cost of permanently extending the 2017 tax cuts. Under this method, the projected increase in the federal deficit is limited to $366 billion. Republicans argue that utilizing traditional accounting methods presents a bias against maintaining existing tax rates, which they perceive as amounting to tax increases if not extended.

This controversial legislative package continues to be a subject of intense debate, with significant political and financial implications for the country, as outlined in the comprehensive report from the Congressional Budget Office.

Vice President Dhankhar Resigns Due to Health Concerns

Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar, who was elected as India’s 14th Vice President in August 2022, resigned citing health reasons on the first day of the Monsoon Session.

Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar announced his resignation on Monday, July 21, 2025, citing health concerns. The unexpected move came on the first day of the Monsoon Session while he was presiding over the Rajya Sabha as Chairman.

Dhankhar, 74, had two years remaining in his term after being elected in August 2022 as the 14th Vice President of India. He follows the precedent of two previous Vice Presidents, V.V. Giri in 1969 and R. Venkatraman in 1987, who resigned before their terms ended to assume the presidency.

In a resignation letter addressed to President Droupadi Murmu, and shared on his official “X” account, Dhankhar stated, “To prioritize health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as the Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the Constitution.”

The letter further expressed Dhankhar’s gratitude towards Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Council of Ministers, and the members of Parliament for their “warmth, trust, and affection.” This announcement took many by surprise, as he actively participated in parliamentary duties, including presiding over a session involving the motion for the removal of High Court judge Yashwant Varma the same day.

Dhankhar continued engaging with MPs and leadership until the evening but did not return for the subsequent post-lunch session. Reports from sources suggest he is unlikely to attend the Rajya Sabha on the following day. His resignation followed a significant health event in March, a cardiac issue from which he was believed to have recovered fully, enabling him to resume his duties thereafter.

Prior to serving as Vice President, Dhankhar was the Governor of West Bengal. His tenure as Vice President saw him dealing with critical issues, often marked by his forthright public speeches. Notably, he emphasized the necessity of dialogue with farmers during protests in late 2024, sharing a platform with Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan to advocate for open communication with the farming community.

Dhankhar’s term also witnessed friction with opposition parties. In December 2024, Deputy Chairperson of the Rajya Sabha, Harivansh, dismissed an impeachment motion against Dhankhar filed by the opposition, labeling it as a deterrent to the dignity of constitutional authorities.

As Vice President, Dhankhar was known to be vocal, often stepping into the political spotlight, yet maintaining a focus on issues pertinent to his rural upbringing. Despite his sudden resignation, he left an indelible mark through his advocacy and commitment to public discourse.

As of the time of this report, President Murmu had not publicly responded to or confirmed her acceptance of Dhankhar’s resignation.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Closes EPA’s Scientific Research Division

The Trump administration is planning significant changes to the Environmental Protection Agency, including the closure of its scientific research arm, as part of a broader federal downsizing effort.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced plans to close its Office of Research and Development, the department tasked with providing critical expertise for environmental policies and regulations. This move is part of the Trump administration’s larger effort to downsize the federal government.

The Office of Research and Development plays a pivotal role in analyzing dangers related to toxic chemicals, climate change, smog, wildfires, indoor air pollutants, water contamination, watershed destruction, and drinking water safety. The office is also responsible for managing grant programs that support research at universities and private companies.

“Under President Trump’s leadership, EPA has taken a close look at our operations to ensure the agency is better equipped than ever to deliver on our core mission of protecting human health and the environment while powering the great American comeback,” stated EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin. He announced the plan on Friday, emphasizing that “this reduction in force will ensure we can better fulfill that mission while being responsible stewards of your hard-earned tax dollars.”

The downsizing, which forms part of a broader strategy to reduce the EPA’s workforce by 23%, is estimated to save approximately $748.8 million. The savings, according to the agency, will be reallocated to enhance “laboratory functions and hundreds of scientific, technical, bioinformatic, and information technology experts” within the EPA’s air, water, and chemical offices. These offices are home to thousands of scientists and engineers employed by the EPA.

Alongside these changes, the EPA also announced plans to establish a new “Office of Applied Science and Environmental Solutions”. The new office aims to prioritize research and science prominently in rulemaking processes and provide technical assistance to states.

While no layoffs have occurred yet, the EPA confirmed that some employees are being reassigned, and job cuts may be the next step. “That is the next step in the process,” the EPA commented in a statement to NPR.

The proposed changes have been met with strong criticism from several quarters. Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, ranking member on the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, denounced the planned cuts. “Administrator Zeldin has finally confirmed what he has denied for months and months — the destruction of the Office of Research and Development,” she said. Lofgren argued that the Trump administration is dismissing dedicated scientists while appointing political figures whose roles are to mislead Congress and the public. “The obliteration of ORD will have generational impacts on Americans’ health and safety. This is a travesty.”

Kyla Bennett, director of science policy for the nonprofit Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), also voiced concerns. Bennett argued that eliminating the ORD will severely impair the EPA’s research capabilities and hinder its ability to utilize studies from other scientists. “This [reduction in force], together with the slashing of travel and training budgets, will leave EPA flying blind and unable to use the best available science. These short-sighted cuts will ultimately affect every American, and it is despicable,” she stated.

In contrast, the American Chemistry Council, representing chemical manufacturers, backed the EPA’s decision to review its resources. The council stressed the importance of ensuring taxpayer money is utilized efficiently and effectively to meet the agency’s legal obligations. “If necessary, that includes shifting resources from certain offices,” the organization commented.

The implications of the EPA’s restructuring remain to be fully understood, but the debate highlights significant divisions over the administration’s approach to environmental research and regulatory functions.

Source: Original article

Many Teens Use AI for Chatting, Prefer Human Interaction

Nearly three-quarters of U.S. teenagers have interacted with AI tools, using them for activities such as advice seeking, flirting, and deep conversations, a new study reveals.

Teenagers have traditionally turned to each other for advice, flirting, and sharing profound conversations. However, a new study indicates that nearly 75% of U.S. teens have used artificial intelligence (AI) tools for these activities at least once.

Conversational AI systems like CHAI, Character.AI, Nomi, and Replika present compelling opportunities for teens to engage in role-playing, seek support for mental health issues, or simply chat. The nationwide study, released by Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization focused on media reviews and research funding for young people, highlights these tools as “digital friends or characters you can text or talk with whenever you want.” These AI companions are distinguished from AI assistants, image generators, or academic help tools.

The findings reveal that over half—52%—of teenagers use AI companions regularly, engaging with them at least a few times each month. “They’re using them for entertainment purposes, out of curiosity,” said Michael Robb, head of research at Common Sense Media. “Despite this, teens still spend more time with real friends and find human conversations more satisfying. But if you scratch the surface, some alarming trends emerge.”

For instance, one-third of teens surveyed admitted to having serious discussions with AI companions instead of real people at least once. Approximately the same percentage have found AI interactions just as, if not more, satisfying than conversations with humans.

Adolescence is critical for developing social, critical thinking, and emotional regulation skills. With an average screen time of 8 hours and 39 minutes daily, according to Common Sense Media, the study’s authors express concern about the influence of AI companions in teens’ digital landscapes. About 25% of the teens surveyed shared personal information, such as their name and location, with AI companions—tools designed to collect user data. Some AI platforms are marketed to audiences as young as 13, though age restrictions are often easily bypassed by young people.

A third of teens reported feeling uncomfortable during interactions with AI companions, troubled by something said or done by the AI. Nonetheless, many teenagers approach AI companions pragmatically; about half of the respondents expressed distrust in the information or advice from AI companions, with younger teens being more trusting by a margin of seven percentage points.

The vast majority of teenagers, 80%, still prioritize human friendships over AI interactions. Common Sense Media recommends that individuals under 18 avoid using AI companions altogether due to the risks involved and the potential for addictive behavior. “I’m not necessarily confident that the companies behind these companions have teens’ well-being in mind,” Robb stated. “If these companions were designed to promote well-being, rather than to capture attention and collect personal information, we might be having a different conversation.”

According to NPR, these findings spotlight the complex dynamics at play as AI tools become an integral part of teenagers’ lives, warranting attention from parents, educators, and technology developers alike.

Trump Supports Gabbard on Obama Prosecution, Criticizes Alleged Election Fraud

In a July 2025 social media post, former President Donald Trump endorsed Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s push for prosecution of former President Barack Obama and key officials for allegedly orchestrating election fraud during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Former President Donald Trump, using his platform on Truth Social, reiterated his claims on July 19, 2025, that former President Barack Obama and his associates were involved in a “treasonous conspiracy” aimed at undermining his 2016 election victory. Trump praised Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard for her role in exposing alleged election fraud and encouraged her to continue pushing for criminal charges against Obama and top officials.

Gabbard released a 114-page declassified report on July 18, detailing accusations against members of Obama’s national security team, including James Clapper, John Brennan, James Comey, and Susan Rice. She alleged that these individuals manipulated intelligence to falsely suggest that Russian interference had favored Trump in the election.

The report cites documents such as a December 7, 2016, memo stating that no cyberattacks altered the election outcome. Gabbard claims that a White House meeting held on December 9, 2016, resulted in a January 2017 intelligence report that wrongly attributed Trump’s victory to Russian interference, subsequently leading to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

The report and its conclusions, however, face significant counterarguments. Previous investigations, including a 2020 bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee, identified “irrefutable evidence” of Russia’s attempts to support Trump, without any indication of fabricated intelligence. Mueller’s 2019 report also described Russia’s interference as “sweeping and systematic,” yet found no evidence of collusion by Trump’s campaign.

Democratic leaders have dismissed Gabbard’s allegations as lacking in foundation. Senator Mark Warner, a senior member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, noted that the 2017 intelligence community assessment was the outcome of a comprehensive three-year investigation. Representative Jim Himes, a Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, labeled the claims of treason as “baseless” due to the absence of credible investigative support.

Furthermore, a review conducted by CIA Director John Ratcliffe maintained the intelligence community’s assessment of Russia’s pro-Trump actions, even while criticizing some methods used in 2017. Gabbard’s expertise in intelligence has also been called into question amid criticism of her report.

The timing of these allegations coincides with increasing scrutiny on the White House regarding its management of Jeffrey Epstein’s files. On July 18, Trump directed Attorney General Pamela Bondi to unseal grand jury testimony tied to Epstein, amid pressure from his political base for a supposed “client list,” which the Department of Justice claims does not exist. Critics argue that Gabbard’s election fraud allegations are intended to divert attention from the Epstein controversy, which includes resurfaced images of Trump with Epstein from the 1990s and a recent report by the Wall Street Journal suggesting a suggestive 2003 letter from Trump.

The release of Gabbard’s report shortly after the Wall Street Journal’s story has prompted speculation that the administration is aiming to redirect public and media focus from the Epstein-related issues to past political disputes.

Democrats’ Poll Standing at Trump’s Six-Month Mark

Recent polls provide a complex picture for Democrats as they face challenges in regaining voter trust following a significant loss to President Trump in the last election.

Despite recent notable election victories, Democrats have struggled to distance themselves from the Republican Party as they look toward the upcoming midterms. Data experts suggest that while the party’s position has somewhat improved since Trump began his second term, much work remains to convince the American public and regain control of the House.

“You can’t just be on the attack. You can’t beat something with nothing,” said Democratic pollster Celinda Lake. “We have to show and tell what we would do, but I think that we’re on the precipice of a big opportunity, and I hope we take advantage of it.”

After losing ground when Trump swept all seven battleground states and the GOP gained control of Congress, Democrats are focusing on rebuilding. However, data on the party’s standing remains less than encouraging halfway through Trump’s first year back in office.

The Democratic Party continues to experience historically low favorability ratings. According to a YouGov average, the party’s favorability was over 20 points underwater as of late May. A CNN poll released recently found only 28% of surveyed Americans view the party favorably, a low not seen since CNN began the poll in 1992. While the Republican Party’s ratings aren’t much better, they haven’t reached the same depths.

A poll conducted by the Democratic super PAC Unite the Country revealed that voters perceive the party as “out of touch,” “woke,” and “weak.” An AP-NORC poll found a divide among party members, with just a third of Democrats optimistic about the party’s future, down from 57% last July.

Survey results highlight widespread frustration with Democratic leaders and a belief that they are not effectively countering the Trump administration. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is a particular focus, with mid-to-upper 20s approval ratings during Trump’s second term, though his net favorability has recently improved slightly.

Scott Tranter, director of data science for Decision Desk HQ (DDHQ), noted that Democrats are struggling to form a coherent message and lack a clear “rallying cry.” Some Democrats have drawn attention, either through confrontations with Trump officials or visits to detention centers like “Alligator Alcatraz” in Florida, but Schumer is still seen as lacking the gravitas of a strong party leader.

One ongoing trend is the absence of a defined Democratic Party leader following the 2024 election defeat. A March CNN poll found that 30% of Democrats couldn’t name a leader reflecting the party’s core values, with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) receiving the most support at only 10%. Former Vice President Kamala Harris was supported by 9%, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) by 8%.

An Emerson College poll shows a wide split among Democrats about preferred 2028 presidential contenders, with the leading candidate only garnering 16% support. Tranter indicated that such disarray is typical after a major election loss, comparing the situation to the post-loss transformations of Democrats in 2005 and Republicans in 2013.

“Coming out of Kerry, the Democrats were also in the wilderness,” he said. “And so I think that the takeaway is that every time something like this happens, each party goes through its transformation. I think we’re still pretty early on [in] it.”

Yet, there’s a silver lining for the Democrats in the data. Trump’s approval and favorability ratings remain underwater, which provides Democrats a potential opening. Democrats also hold a small lead in DDHQ’s generic congressional ballot average as of early March, a margin that continues to hover at a few points.

The same CNN poll that highlighted the Democrats’ low favorability also showed party members are more motivated to vote in the next year’s midterms. A Republican pollster Fabrizio Ward’s survey found Republicans trailing in the generic ballot across 28 battleground House districts. Moreover, Democrats are hopeful that opposing Trump’s recent “big beautiful bill” may provide the needed boost for their base before the midterms.

Ryan O’Donnell, interim executive director at Data for Progress, noted Trump’s focus on unpopular policies potentially benefits Democrats going into the midterms. However, he warned that Democrats also must listen to voter concerns and propose real solutions to improve quality of life and affordability.

Lake emphasized the lack of a clear leader could become an asset, with a crowded field in 2028 showcasing what the Democratic alternative to Trump could look like. However, finding and establishing a few strong leaders has been slow, and she doubts this will be “fixed” before the 2026 midterms. She encourages the party to present a unified voice with a strong economic message addressing who they will fight for.

Finally, a partnered poll between Lake’s firm and the Democratic donor network Way to Win surveyed those who voted for President Biden in 2020 but abstained in 2024. The findings showed these voters leaned Democratic if the midterms were held today and felt discontent about Medicaid cuts and stagnant living costs.

Jenifer Fernandez Ancona, the co-founder and vice president of Way to Win, stated that these concerns offer the party a clear opening. With respondents expressing regret over not voting, particularly regarding child aid program cuts and escalating living costs, Ancona urged the party to leverage this data to build an opposition narrative.

“The table has been set,” Fernandez Ancona said. “The question is, will we be able to take advantage of it? Will we really lean in? Will we not shy away from actually going on offense about this bill? It’s all about, can we seize the opportunity?”

Natasha Sarin and Yale Budget Lab Analyze Important Budget Bill

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) is projected to significantly increase the U.S. federal deficit by more than $4 trillion over the next decade, while disproportionately affecting lower-income households by reducing their after-tax income.

The Yale Budget Lab estimates that the federal deficit will grow by over $4 trillion in the coming decade as a result of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), according to Natasha Sarin, co-founder and president of The Budget Lab at Yale. Speaking at the American Community Media briefing, Sarin discussed the long-term economic impacts of this legislation on the national deficit and the broader economy.

The fiscal implications of the OBBBA are significant. Sarin, a professor at Yale Law School and the Yale School of Management, remarked that the bill functions as “Robinhood in reverse.” She explained that the federal deficit is expected to increase, leading to a debt-to-GDP ratio rising from its current level close to 100% to about 135% by the end of the decade. This would mean that the nation’s debts will substantially surpass its economic output.

Sarin noted that higher deficits will escalate the government’s borrowing costs, which will, in turn, affect households and businesses by increasing mortgage rates and the cost of various loans. This could result in higher expenses for car loans, student loans, and small business loans, contributing to a decreasing economic output over time.

Analyzing the winners and losers from the OBBBA, Sarin, along with her colleague Richard Prisinzano, Director of Policy Analysis at the Yale Budget Lab, questioned the distribution of trillions of dollars set to be spent under this legislation. Their findings indicate that households in the lowest 10% income bracket could lose approximately $700 annually in after-tax and transfer income over the decade spanning 2026 to 2034.

For the country’s wealthiest, the scenario is quite the opposite. The top 1% of earners could see an increase of about $30,000 per year in after-tax income. Those in the top 0.1% income bracket, earning more than $5.18 million, as per estimates from CBS MoneyWatch, could benefit by as much as $286,440 annually.

Sarin underscored that the bottom 40% of income earners would be worse off post-OBBBA, bearing the burden of cuts in programs like Medicaid and SNAP, which outweigh the benefits from any tax changes included in the bill.

The OBBBA entails significant changes in tariff policies, with effective tariff rates rising to about 18.7%, compared to approximately 2% at the beginning of the current administration. Sarin pointed out that lower-income households, which spend a larger portion of their income on essential goods, including food, energy, housing, and transportation, are particularly susceptible to the effects of higher tariffs.

The OBBBA incorporates a historic $900 billion cut to Medicaid, marking the largest reduction in the program’s history. Though framed primarily as a tax cut bill, the legislation represents the most profound change to the healthcare system since the Affordable Care Act (ACA), said Larry Levitt, Executive Vice President for Health Policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Levitt stated that the Congressional Budget Office estimates this legislation will decrease federal health spending by more than a trillion dollars over the next decade and potentially increase the uninsured population by 11.8 million. These figures might decrease slightly due to last-minute bill changes. However, the magnitude of these healthcare system changes is considerable, with 4.8 million individuals expected to lose coverage primarily due to bureaucratic complexities and increased Medicaid renewal requirements.

The healthcare marketplace will also undergo significant transformation. New income verification procedures will complicate the process of obtaining coverage, and the discontinuation of automatic coverage renewal may result in many losing their insurance. Furthermore, many low-income, lawfully present immigrants will become ineligible for premium assistance under the ACA, as well as Medicaid and Medicare.

Levitt highlighted potential administrative efforts to penalize states like California for using state funds to provide healthcare to undocumented immigrants. Congress has waived notable amounts of Medicare and Medicaid funding, totaling about half a trillion dollars, but there is no certainty that such waivers will continue in the future.

The enhanced premium tax credits available under the ACA are set to expire at the year’s end. If not extended, these developments could cause out-of-pocket premiums for more than 20 million enrollees to surge by an average of more than 75%, potentially leaving millions uninsured by the beginning of 2026. Notably, many of the significant changes introduced by the OBBBA will unfold gradually, with notable effects emerging after the upcoming midterm elections and beyond.

Passport Renewal Eases for Some in America

Renewing a passport in the United States has been revolutionized by a new online system, making the process faster, simpler, and completely digital for many citizens.

For years, American citizens faced a complicated and time-consuming process when their passports expired. It involved extensive paperwork, frustrating visits to the post office, and long wait times. However, a recent transformation spearheaded by the U.S. State Department has ushered in a new era of digital convenience.

The Online Passport Renewal (OPR) program has fundamentally changed how U.S. citizens renew their passports. With no more paperwork, government office visits, or physical queues, citizens can now complete the entire renewal process from the comfort of their homes. By simply taking a digital photo, uploading it through a secure portal, and submitting an online payment, applicants often receive their new passports in under two weeks—an efficiency once unimaginable in the realm of government services.

Since its inception, the OPR program has become a quiet but significant revolution within the U.S. State Department, now managing nearly half of all passport renewals. To date, over three million Americans have utilized this system, with an impressive 94% satisfaction rate, a testament to its reliability and user-friendliness.

The success of the OPR system is even more remarkable considering the severe challenges the passport bureaucracy encountered just two years earlier. By 2023, a post-pandemic surge in international travel, combined with staffing challenges and outdated systems, resulted in an overwhelming demand for passport processing. With over 25 million passports being handled annually—an increase from previous decades—offices were swamped, with backlogs becoming the norm.

During those times, employees were even instructed to move storage bins closer to their workstations to save seconds in processing times, underscoring the desperation of the situation. In the words of former Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, Rena Bitter, “Our only tool was elbow grease.”

The idea of online renewal had been discussed for years, but previous attempts, including a botched 2022 pilot, yielded little success. Adjudicators accustomed to processing hundreds of paper applications daily could only manage a few with the new system, leading to a process ironically overflowing with inefficiencies, such as printing digital forms to rescan them later.

Despite initial setbacks, a determined team led by Chief Information Officer Luis Coronado and veteran passport official Matt Pierce refused to abandon the project. In 2024, they decided to reboot the initiative with a new approach. Instead of a broad launch, they introduced a controlled beta version, rolling it out incrementally and addressing user feedback at each stage.

With careful planning and attention to user needs, bugs—like those causing photo upload errors—were systematically rectified. By September 2024, the improved Online Passport Renewal system was launched to the entire eligible American citizenry.

Responses to the new system were swift and overwhelmingly positive. Users reported completing the renewal process in as little as 15 minutes, considerably faster than routine tasks like ordering dinner online. Some even received their passports within just 10 days, far surpassing expectations.

Matt Pierce himself illustrated the program’s dedication to public service by assisting an elderly applicant over the phone while boarding a cruise. Such personalized service has become emblematic of the OPR initiative. As stated by Rena Bitter, “You will not meet a group of people more committed to public service.”

According to Times of India, the meticulous approach and dedication of the team have turned the OPR program into a model of digital transformation within government services.

Source: Original article

Trump Sues WSJ for Libel Over Epstein Birthday Letters Report

President Donald Trump has initiated a $20 billion libel lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal over reports he allegedly gifted Jeffrey Epstein a note bearing his name and an image of a naked woman.

President Donald Trump has launched legal action against the Wall Street Journal and its reporters, seeking at least $20 billion in damages. The lawsuit, filed in a Miami federal court, accuses the publication of failing to adhere to journalistic standards in a story about a collection of letters allegedly gifted to Jeffrey Epstein, which included a note purportedly from Trump featuring an outline of a naked woman. Trump firmly denies authorship of the letter.

The 18-page lawsuit describes the Wall Street Journal’s alleged lapses, highlighting that the publication did not produce the drawing or the letter in their report, claiming their absence because “no authentic letter or drawing exists,” according to Trump’s attorney.

Trump expressed his intention to initiate legal proceedings promptly after the Journal’s article surfaced on Thursday, naming reporters Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo as defendants. Trump also singled out Rupert Murdoch, owner of News Corp, during a Truth Social post, suggesting Murdoch had assured Trump he would manage the situation.

In response, Dow Jones, the Journal’s parent company, released a statement expressing confidence in the report’s accuracy and pledging to defend against the lawsuit vigorously.

Scrutiny has intensified lately concerning Trump’s past association with Epstein, the deceased convicted sex offender who died in a Manhattan jail in 2019 awaiting trial for federal sex trafficking charges. Amid his 2024 campaign, Trump spoke about potentially releasing more files on Epstein, responding to right-wing voices demanding further transparency around Epstein’s controversial case.

A Justice Department memo published earlier this month dismissed the existence of any “client list” maintained by Epstein implicating influential men in illegal activities. However, the absence of such a list has disappointed many of Trump’s supporters, creating a rift within his MAGA base.

The president’s relationship with media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who also owns Fox News, has been characterized by fluctuating dynamics over the years. Trump has repeatedly been a focal point in Murdoch’s media outlets, including Fox News, which prominently features Trump’s daughter-in-law, Lara Trump.

Facing ongoing legal battles with media entities, Trump seems undeterred, continuing to challenge stories he deems defamatory. Legal scholars note his presidency is one of the rare administrations seeing direct lawsuits from the president against media organizations.

First Amendment attorney Ted Boutrous mentioned that it is notably uncommon for a sitting president to sue a reporter or publication for defamation, emphasizing that the presidential “bully pulpit” often suffices in addressing grievances over alleged misrepresentations.

In 2024, Trump initiated legal actions against multiple media outlets during his reelection campaign. A notable instance involved ABC and claims from George Stephanopoulos regarding a jury’s findings in E. Jean Carroll’s case. ABC’s parent company, Disney, settled with Trump, setting a precedent for future settlements linked to Trump’s presidential library funding.

Trump recently withdrew a lawsuit against CBS News related to a “60 Minutes” segment, with Paramount agreeing to a payment as part of the settlement. Further settlements with Meta and X highlight Trump’s sustained focus on countering adversarial coverage.

Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond law professor, points to Trump’s approach as a tactical maneuver designed to instill caution among media outlets in their coverage of Trump and government matters, citing ongoing litigation as efforts that challenge First Amendment freedoms.

Following the lawsuit’s filing, Trump noted on Truth Social his anticipation of Murdoch and his associates undergoing extensive depositions and testimonies as part of the proceedings.

Source: Original article

Billionaires Pledge $1 Billion for AI-Driven Economic Mobility

Five of America’s leading philanthropists have pledged more than $1 billion to a new initiative aimed at improving economic mobility for low-income Americans, with the support of artificial intelligence company Anthropic.

In the United States, the dream of climbing the economic ladder is becoming increasingly elusive. In response, five influential billionaires—Bill Gates, Charles Koch, Steve Ballmer, Scott Cook, and John Overdeck—are joining forces in a bid to reverse this trend and reinvigorate the notion of equal opportunity. These philanthropists have collectively committed over $1 billion to establish NextLadder Ventures, a philanthropic venture focused on enhancing economic mobility. This new initiative also involves a partnership with artificial intelligence giant Anthropic to leverage technology for this cause.

Charles Koch, known for his book “Believe in People: Bottom-Up Solutions For A Top-Down World,” writes about the societal challenges contributing to a declining sense of upward mobility. He cites rising suicide rates and drug overdoses as indicative of a society moving towards a stark divide between those who progress and those who fall behind. Through NextLadder Ventures, Koch and his fellow billionaires aim to steer change toward a more equitable environment.

Ryan Rippel, CEO of NextLadder Ventures, brings valuable insight and experience from his tenure at the Gates Foundation, focusing on economic mobility. He explains that the coalition of these billionaires is driven by a shared question: how to effect meaningful change for individuals facing significant economic barriers daily.

Rippel, who faced his own financial challenges growing up in Missouri after losing both parents, sees this mission as vital. Currently, more than one in ten Americans live below the poverty line, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. On top of that, data from the Urban Institute indicates that over half of U.S. citizens are unable to save beyond their monthly expenses. Rippel believes advancing AI and similar technologies could play a significant role in addressing these economic challenges.

Kevin Bromer, executive director of the Ballmer Group, reflects on the collective effort: “We had a common recognition that we’re at an inflection point in the social impact and technology spaces and viewed this as the perfect time to come together and have an opportunity to go further as a group than we could individually.”

The $1 billion from NextLadder Ventures will be allocated over the next seven years across nonprofit and for-profit ventures. This funding will be dispersed via grants, equity investments, and revenue-based financing methods. Proceeds from such investments will be reinvested to maintain their philanthropic mission.

Though no funding commitments have been formalized yet, entities like CarePortal and Rasa-Legal are examples of initiatives aligned with NextLadder’s mission. CarePortal connects children and families in need with community resources, while Rasa-Legal assists clients in expunging criminal records at a fraction of the usual cost.

Anthropic’s contribution to the initiative includes providing free AI processing power and technical support to NextLadder Ventures’ beneficiaries, facilitating innovative solutions to reach the market more swiftly.

Over the coming 15 years, NextLadder Ventures plans to incorporate more philanthropic partners and secure additional funding. The goal is to foster a robust market of scalable technologies capable of aiding low-income individuals, social workers, legal aid providers, and others in overcoming economic hurdles such as job loss and housing instability.

Beyond NextLadder Ventures, these billionaire philanthropists intend to continue their support for economic mobility through their respective foundations. Gates, Ballmer, and Koch are notable figures on Forbes’ list of top American philanthropists, each having made significant contributions to various social causes. Gates, for instance, has distributed nearly $47.7 billion through the Gates Foundation, primarily targeting health and poverty alleviation.

Meanwhile, Steve Ballmer, alongside his wife Connie, has focused on education and economic mobility, including pledges to Communities In Schools and StriveTogether. Charles Koch has contributed approximately $1.9 billion, mainly through the Stand Together network, focusing on education and criminal justice reform. Though not in the top 25 philanthropists, Scott Cook and John Overdeck have each donated nearly $500 million through their foundations.

Brian Hooks, CEO of Koch’s Stand Together, highlights the uniqueness of this collaborative effort, stating, “I don’t think there’s ever been a collaboration among philanthropies quite like this. The potential for all of us to do much more than we could in another situation is just enormous.”

Source: Original article

India’s Cooling Inflation Spurs Rate Cut Calls, Demand Concerns

A significant drop in India’s retail inflation to record lows is fueling calls for interest rate cuts, highlighting concerns over weakening demand.

India has witnessed a substantial decrease in retail inflation, reaching a six-year low, prompting discussions about potential interest rate cuts within the year. Analysts suggest that this decline underscores a weakening demand in the economy, necessitating further financial stimulus.

The drop in June’s headline inflation is paired with low core inflation, which remains below 4% when excluding gold, silver, and fuel prices. This indicates softer underlying consumption, which analysts believe could require additional support from monetary policy.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) executed a greater-than-expected interest rate cut of 50 basis points in June, changing its stance to ‘neutral,’ which signaled limited scope for additional cuts. However, the unexpected inflation figures from Monday have led to increased speculation about further easing. Swap rates have declined, reflecting market bets on at least one more rate cut.

Economist Radhika Rao from DBS Bank anticipates another 50 basis point cut in the current easing cycle. She said the softer-than-expected data, such as production, credit growth, and auto sales, alongside inflation figures below projections for the first half of fiscal 2026, will likely motivate the RBI’s monetary policy committee to further reduce rates, without specifying a timeframe.

The next RBI policy review is in early August, but analysts predict the bank will wait for more data and clarity regarding global trade tensions before acting, potentially in September or October.

Signs of weak demand are emerging in sectors like automotive and real estate. Car sales to dealers in June hit an 18-month low, and home sales in India’s top seven cities fell by 20% during the April-June quarter, according to a report from real estate consultancy Anarock.

Gaura Sen Gupta, chief economist at IDFC First Bank, expects the central bank to cut rates once more in either October or December, citing high-frequency indicators that continue to show moderation in urban consumption and private capital expenditures.

India’s central bank projects inflation for the year to remain below 3.7%, as Governor Sanjay Malhotra told CNBC TV-18. He emphasized that the monetary policy committee will consider both the current and future inflation outlook when deciding on further rate adjustments.

In an earlier interview following the June policy decision, Governor Malhotra noted that lower-than-expected inflation could provide additional room for policy maneuvering. Economist Samiran Chakraborty from Citi mentioned that despite the RBI’s ‘neutral’ stance, the softer Consumer Price Index (CPI) figures present an opportunity for some monetary easing.

The average inflation rate in the April-June quarter was 2.7%, below the RBI’s forecast of 2.9%. Citi projects July’s inflation could hit a record low of 1.1% and estimates an annual average of 3.2% for the financial year 2025-26, the lowest since 1990.

The deceleration in urban consumption in India, attributed to weak wage growth and depleted household savings, began last year. Despite a rural demand recovery following a strong monsoon, progress has been inconsistent.

Sales of two-wheel vehicles, a rural demand proxy, increased by merely 4.7% in June but dropped 12.5% month-on-month. Private investment also remains sluggish, with capacity utilization stuck at around 75–76% for over a year—below the threshold typically needed to spur new capital expenditures.

Madhavi Arora, an economist at Emkay Global, suggested that investment is unlikely to see immediate growth due to global trade uncertainties and a skeptical domestic demand outlook. She pointed out that India’s growth seems stagnant at a range of 6.0%–6.5%, largely due to absent private sector participation.

Although government capital expenditures rose in the first quarter of fiscal 2026, the previously announced tax cuts in the budget limit further fiscal stimulus options. According to IDFC’s Sen Gupta, with constraints on fiscal policy to stimulate growth, monetary policy will need to play a critical role.

Source: Original article

Warren Buffett: Success in Life Hinges on Love

Warren Buffett, renowned investor, defines true success not through financial achievements but by the love and respect one earns from those around them.

Warren Buffett, one of the most celebrated investors of our time, offers a poignant perspective on success that goes beyond financial gain. His insights are not only rooted in investment acumen but also in understanding what truly matters in life—human connections and the love we cultivate from others.

A few years back, speaking to students at Georgia Tech, Buffett articulated his personal definition of success with disarming honesty. He emphasized, “If you get to my age in life and nobody thinks well of you, I don’t care how big your bank account is, your life is a disaster.” This insightful comment underscores Buffett’s belief that true success is measured not by wealth, but by the depth of relationships and the love one inspires.

Buffett elaborates on this in his biography, The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life. He stated, “You’ll really measure your success in life by how many of the people you want to have love you actually do love you.” He further noted that despite financial accomplishments, a truly successful life is defined by genuine connections, which can only be cultivated by being lovable and giving love generously.

This sentiment challenges the conventional narrative of success, which often prioritizes ambition, competition, and personal advancement. While striving for wealth and recognition frequently isolates individuals, Buffett’s approach underscores the importance of trust, respect, and loyalty as core elements of meaningful success.

For leaders today, Buffett’s wisdom offers valuable guidance. Effective leaders do not focus excessively on self-promotion or singular achievement. Instead, they prioritize empowering others, cultivating communities, and nurturing relationships. This approach to leadership ultimately reflects in the legacy one leaves—how well one has cared for others rather than one’s own achievements.

In today’s climate of division and workplace dynamics shaped by remote work, diminishing employee loyalty, and widespread burnout, Buffett’s message becomes ever more relevant. It suggests that true leadership and legacy are not about your accomplishments in building companies or teams. Instead, it focuses on the impact you have on others and how you’ve treated them throughout your journey.

Buffett’s philosophy can be practically applied in several ways:

Lead Selflessly: Prioritize giving over receiving. Effective leaders selflessly support and develop others without expecting an immediate return. Research indicates that servant leaders cultivate teams that are more committed and productive because people tend to value leaders who make them feel appreciated and secure.

Strategic Love in Business: While affection and business may seem mismatched, Buffett illustrates the advantages of enjoying one’s work environment. Companies that cultivate a values-driven, supportive culture experience better overall performance. Investing in such cultures results in greater trust, collaboration, and employee satisfaction.

Adopt the Platinum Rule: While the Golden Rule encourages treating others as you wish to be treated, the Platinum Rule advocates for treating others as they want to be treated. This approach requires empathy and emotional intelligence, enabling leaders to adapt their methods based on understanding the needs of others.

Find and Share Your Passion: Align your work with what energizes you and support others in doing the same. Successful leaders encourage people to engage in work that is meaningful to them. The enthusiasm one brings to their work can be infectious, motivating and inspiring those around them.

In conclusion, Warren Buffett’s reflections on love as a metric of success challenge traditional ideals. His philosophy questions the singular pursuit of wealth and highlights the importance of nurturing meaningful relationships. The essence of success lies not in material gain but in the enduring impact of love and kindness shared with others.

Source: Original article

Dr. Abdulla Manjeri: From Kerala to Saudi Arabia: A Journey of Several Milestones

Dr. Abdulla Manjeri, a distinguished professional with a rich career spanning various leadership roles, wears many a hat. Dr. Manjeri is an accomplished academician, educator, entrepreneur, business leader, and community leader.

f25b83c5 8c77 4fc0 9a93 cf03a50ab217

Born and raised in Kerala, India, Dr. Manjeri has lived, studied, and worked in several countries, gaining experience and exposure to diverse cultures and peoples around the globe. He holds a Doctoral Degree in Business Administration and had his higher studies completed at the prestigious Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) in New Delhi, India.

Dr. Manjeri currently serves as the CEO & Managing Director of the British Scholar Olympiad (BSO), UK. Additionally, he coordinates the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) and AMITY University in Saudi Arabia and is the Managing Trustee of the Tangible Liberators Smarme Anodyne Trust (TALSAT).Previously, Dr. Manjeri had served as the Associate Director (Middle East) at the International Institute for Science and Academic Collaboration (IISAC), USA.

A successful entrepreneur, owning and managing several businesses, Dr. Manjeri is the CMD of German Gulf Aviation Services India, with its registered office in Delhi. He is the Director & Partner of Ameri Air Aviation, based in United Arab Emirates, and is the President of MANJERSON Softech (P) Ltd.

f74a9df4 c71c 440f 83a6 91ad0cd463d6

Dr. Manjeri owned PAN Arab Co. in Doha, Qatar, and co-owned Allied Hospitality Services in Doha, Qatar. Currently, he runs KURIKKAL TRADERS LTD in India, a company specializing in building materials and innovative technology. In addition, he owns ISHA Designs in Bahrain.

His professional affiliations include serving as President and Chairman of the Indian Cultural Welfare Society (ICWS) and as the Global Vice Chairman and Global Good Will Ambassador of the World Malayalee Council. Currently, he serves as the managing Director of Global Malayalee festival, panned to be held in Kochi, India on Jan. 1-2, 2026.

When asked about his motivating factors in life that have enabled him to be a successful business leader and community leader, Dr. Manjeri is says, “They are driven by a desire for meaningful relationships, helping the downtrodden and desire for purpose, personal growth and community service making an enduring and perpetual impact in the life.”

84b2eaa0 98fe 4674 871b a1133b2faf90

Success comes to those with determination and dedication. Dr. Manjeri had to face many challenges in his endeavors to realize his mission in life. “As life is challenging for those who keep values, I had to overcome many challenges to reach where I am today,” he recalls.

Dr. Manjeri gives credit to his father, whom he describes as his mentor, who had instilled in him several qualities that help him to be a good human being and a successful business leader. “My dad was my mentor. He constantly guided me through my life. He always wanted me to be a shining crystal in the solution of life.”

Abdullla family

Dr. Manjeri’s dedication to community services is highlighted by his involvement in the Managing Committee of IISD. He was the chairman of the Board of Directors of International Indian School Dammam for two terms, and he was recognized for his contributions to literacy campaigns in Kerala.His commitment to professional service is evident through his roles as a symposium co-organizer and chief organizer of seminars on renewable energy.

Dr. Manjeri has shown profound passion for education. He has been actively involved in teaching and mentoring students. In the early years of his career, he worked as a lecturer at MTI Education Complex in Vallancheri, Kerala, where he eventually became the Administrative Principal of the institution. He has delivered guest lectures and conducted workshops at various institutions, sharing his expertise in business administration, entrepreneurship, and leadership.

A major highlight and accomplished aspect that Dr. Manjeri cherishes in life is that he had served the chairman of International Indian School Dammam, one of the largest schools in Asia. “While I was the chairman of IISD, the school had enrolled 19,500 students under one roof. I got elected to the Board of Management for three terms and had served as the Chairman of the Board twice,” Dr. Majeri proudly states.

His teaching philosophy emphasizes practical knowledge and real-world applications, preparing students to excel in their careers. Through his roles at IGNOU and AMITY University in Saudi Arabia, he has contributed significantly to the academic development of students, fostering a culture of learning and innovation.

Recognition and awards came his way, as he became a role model to his fellow citizens and communities around the world. Dr. Manjeri has been honored with several awards including the Youth Expat Award in 2005 by GARSHOM, recognizing his contributions to conserving culture and heritage.

Dr. Manjeri is married to Shamla, and the couple are blessed with four children, three boys  and a girl. His older son Aijas, working at a Multi-national Company, is married to Amina. His two younger sons are doing businesses and are licensed at the Ministry of Investment in Saudi Arabia. His youngest child is Alisha, who is born and raised in Saudi Arabia and is in High School.

While feeling elated and proud of his achievements, accomplishments, and contributionsto humanity, Dr. Manjeri says, “Being a good human being has been the mission and goal in my life.”

Fed Reports Businesses Passing Tariff Costs to Consumers

Businesses are transferring increased input costs due to tariffs onto consumers, resulting in higher prices, according to the Federal Reserve’s latest report.

The Federal Reserve’s recently released “Beige Book,” an anecdotal survey of domestic economic conditions, has highlighted a widespread trend wherein businesses across various sectors are raising prices to counter the additional costs imposed by tariffs. This trend was reported across all 12 of the Fed’s regional districts, reflecting a national impact.

“Many firms passed on at least a portion of cost increases to consumers through price hikes or surcharges,” noted the Beige Book. Companies that opted not to pass these costs on to consumers encountered narrowed profit margins, as consumer price sensitivity continues to grow.

The Labor Department reported an increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in June, partially attributed to these tariffs, with the annual rise reaching 2.7% up from 2.4% in May and 2.3% in April. This increase aligns with economists’ predictions, who anticipated that the inflationary pressures from tariffs would become visible as summer progressed and as prior inventories cleared.

Fitch Ratings has cited the aggregate U.S. tariff rate at 14.1%, marking the highest rate in decades. This figure encompasses President Trump’s 10% general tariff, along with specific tariffs targeting China and certain individual goods. However, the country-specific “reciprocal” tariffs are currently on hold amid ongoing trade negotiations, and will remain paused until August 1.

Import prices recorded a modest increase of 0.1% in June, according to the Labor Department, yet they are down 0.2% compared to the previous year due to lower energy prices. This outcome fell short of economists’ expectations. Fuel import prices decreased by 0.7% in June, following a significant 5% drop in May, as tensions in the Middle East influenced global energy markets. West Texas Intermediate crude oil witnessed a decline of over 10% this month.

Excluding fuel and food imports, core import prices saw a moderate rise of 0.2% in June, following a smaller 0.1% increase in May.

Adding to the economic dynamics, the U.S. dollar has depreciated by approximately 9% since the start of the year, a trend exacerbated by the ongoing trade war initiated by President Trump. Economists suggest that this decline in the dollar’s value could further exacerbate inflation.

Michael Pearce, deputy chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, commented to Reuters, “Since the Trump administration began imposing tariffs, the dollar has depreciated, which could lead to a larger pass-through from tariffs to consumer prices.” He underscored the potential for a weaker dollar to amplify the likelihood of firms transferring a more significant share of tariff costs to consumers.

Russia Warns US of World War Three Risks

Russia has issued a stark warning to the Western world, cautioning that a potential World War Three would not be limited to European borders, following Ukraine’s attack on Russia’s Kursk region.

In the wake of a Ukrainian attack on the western Kursk region of Russia, which has resulted in significant territorial gains for Ukraine, Russian officials have escalated their rhetoric toward the West. The assault, described as the largest foreign incursion on Russian soil since World War Two, prompted a response from Russian President Vladimir Putin who warned of a “worthy” retaliatory action.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, speaking from Moscow, accused the West of attempting to exacerbate the situation in Ukraine. He cautioned against the potential approval of Ukraine’s request to strike deeper into Russian territory with Western-supplied missiles. Lavrov emphasized the dangers posed by such actions, likening them to “playing with fire” and underscoring the risk of nuclear conflict.

“Americans unequivocally associate conversations about a Third World War as something that, God forbid, if it happens, will affect Europe exclusively,” Lavrov stated, indicating the wider implications of the conflict.

Russia also reiterated its military doctrine concerning the use of nuclear weapons, established in 2020, which reserves the use of such weapons as a retaliatory measure to attacks involving nuclear arms or other weapons of mass destruction that threaten the state’s very existence.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dismissed Kremlin threats of retaliation as bluffs, asserting that the attack on Kursk was a demonstration of their resolve. He highlighted existing restrictions by allies as limitations to Ukraine’s ability to target Russian military positions effectively. Zelenskiy called upon Ukraine’s allies to take bolder steps in supporting Kyiv’s military efforts.

The Kremlin accused Western countries, particularly the United States and Britain, of supplying tactical support and weaponry to Ukraine. This includes British tanks and U.S. rocket systems, which Kyiv has confirmed were part of their operations in Kursk. The U.S.-supplied HIMARS missiles were specifically used to sabotage bridges in the region.

The United States maintains that it was unaware of Ukraine’s plans for the operation in Kursk, emphasizing that it played no active role in the campaign. Nevertheless, The New York Times reported that intelligence provided by the United States and Britain, including satellite imagery, was shared with Ukraine post-attack to aid in tracking Russian troop movements.

Despite Western assertions to the contrary, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov labeled the involvement of the United States as an “obvious fact.” Meanwhile, Sergei Naryshkin, head of Russian foreign intelligence, also questioned Western denials of involvement in the Kursk attack.

As tensions remain high, the international community watches closely, aware that any further escalation could have far-reaching consequences beyond the European continent.

Trump Presidency News on July 17, 2025

House Republican leaders are working to expedite the passage of President Donald Trump’s proposed $9 billion federal funding cuts amid negotiations with party members pushing for a vote on a Jeffrey Epstein-related measure.

In efforts to secure enough support, House Republican leaders are gearing up for an extended session as they seek to advance a $9 billion package of federal funding cuts championed by President Donald Trump. The legislative push follows a day marked by intense discussions with GOP members who are advocating for a vote on a measure related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Simultaneously, a report from the Wall Street Journal has surfaced concerning a controversial letter allegedly linked to President Trump. The report highlighted a collection of letters given to Epstein on his 50th birthday in 2003, among which was a note purportedly bearing Trump’s name alongside an outline of a naked woman. In response, President Trump has denied authoring the letter and expressed intentions to file a lawsuit against the publication.

Adding to the developments surrounding the president, the White House has provided an update on Trump’s health. Recently, medical examinations were conducted on him due to swelling observed in his legs. According to his doctor, the diagnosis is chronic venous insufficiency, a condition prevalent among older individuals. The examination ruled out severe complications such as heart failure, arterial disease, or other significant illnesses.

The health update aims to allay concerns regarding the president’s well-being, as the administration simultaneously manages its legislative aims and addresses emerging issues tied to Trump’s long-standing affiliations and public controversies.

This article information is attributed to the Wall Street Journal, as well as the latest communications from the White House.

Musk’s $20 Trillion Plan Could Merge Two Continents

Elon Musk’s ambitious plan to construct a $20 trillion transatlantic tunnel aims to connect New York and London, cutting travel time to under an hour with high-speed magnetic trains.

Elon Musk, known for reshaping the transportation and infrastructure landscape through ventures like Tesla and SpaceX, is now turning his attention toward an audacious project: a $20 trillion plan to build a tunnel under the Atlantic Ocean. The goal is to link New York and London via magnetic trains traveling in low-pressure tubes, potentially reducing the trip to under an hour. This new project would be an extension of his work with The Boring Company, which has previously focused on shorter urban transit solutions.

The Boring Company claims that the transatlantic tunnel could be constructed at a fraction of the cost of traditional methods—up to 1,000 times cheaper. The trains within this tunnel would reportedly reach speeds close to 4,800 kilometers per hour. The concept isn’t entirely new to Musk, as he first introduced a high-speed transit system in 2013 with the Hyperloop, aimed at connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles. However, the Hyperloop has remained largely experimental, hindered by cost and technical challenges, even as test tracks have been developed in countries like India and China.

Historically, the idea of a transatlantic tunnel has fascinated engineers and futurists for more than a century, first proposed in the early 1900s. Yet, past attempts have never materialized due to the astronomical costs and the significant engineering hurdles involved. A tunnel stretching over 3,000 miles under the Atlantic would either need to traverse beneath the seabed or hang suspended underwater. For perspective, the Channel Tunnel between France and the U.K. is only 23 miles long yet took six years to complete. A project on the scale of an Atlantic tunnel could potentially take centuries to build.

Despite the excitement surrounding the proposal, there is currently no detailed plan, budget, or timeline for the monumental project. Although technology continues to advance, the notion of zipping under the Atlantic Ocean remains largely theoretical. Should the tunnel eventually come into existence, it could more than just reduce travel times. It has the potential to overhaul global trade routes, reshape economic ties, and redefine how nations interact. From an engineering standpoint, it represents a tremendous leap—pushing the boundaries of what’s feasible for oceanic infrastructure construction. However, the immense technical, financial, and political hurdles make the idea a distant prospect for now.

The formidable oceanic pressures beneath the Atlantic present a considerable challenge for any proposed tunnel design. Critics argue that the presented cost estimates challenge accepted engineering and logistical practicalities. The deep-sea pressures, combined with the extensive scale of excavation required and the various geopolitical obstacles, compound the hurdles to be overcome. Nevertheless, discussions regarding the transatlantic tunnel are no longer limited to speculative discussions or far-off future fantasies. As global transportation seeks its next significant evolution and with Musk’s history of turning the improbable into reality, enthusiasm for the project is beginning to gain momentum in influential circles.

According to EcoPortal, this ambitious vision reflects a broader interest in overhauling transportation infrastructure to meet future needs. The ongoing development of high-speed, long-distance travel technologies suggests this is a pivotal area of focus that may one day revolutionize global connections.

Source: Original article

Trust in US Dollar’s Global Supremacy Diminishing

Global de-dollarization is not a threat to stability but rather a rebalancing of global monetary dynamics as countries reject an economic system historically tilted in Washington’s favor.

For over eighty years, the U.S. dollar has held the position of the world’s leading reserve currency, established at the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference and reinforced by the United States’ postwar industrial prowess and military influence.

Today, this dominance is increasingly being challenged from various fronts worldwide—from African revolutionary initiatives to economic recalibrations within Europe, and from the collective counteractions of BRICS nations to the geopolitical complexities involving Ukraine and Israel.

The erosion of global trust in Washington’s leadership of the international financial order has hastened a long-anticipated shift toward a multi-polar monetary structure.

The BRICS economic alliance, consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, and recently expanded to include Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Argentina, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates, is spearheading this de-dollarization trend. Now surpassing the G7 in purchasing power parity (PPP), BRICS is increasingly pushing for a reformed global financial system.

Nations within this bloc have begun trading in their own currencies, reducing reliance on the U.S. dollar. For example, India and Russia conduct oil transactions in rupees and rubles, while China and Brazil have developed processes for settling trade in yuan and Brazilian reals. Russia’s exclusion from the SWIFT financial system following its invasion of Ukraine has expedited this transition.

Economist Jeffrey Sachs has criticized the United States for using the dollar as a geopolitical tool through financial sanctions and trade restrictions. In response, countries in the global south are vigorously pursuing economic autonomy.

A quiet yet significant movement is unfolding in Africa, especially across the Sahel region. Influential leaders, such as Ibrahim Traoré of Burkina Faso, have declared intentions to abandon the CFA franc, a currency historically linked to French control and the euro. Traoré has emerged as a prominent voice in the call for economic self-governance, proposing the establishment of a pan-African currency to serve as a symbol of decolonization.

The proposed unified African currency, supported by countries like Mali, Niger, and Guinea, represents more than monetary policy; it signals a decades-long economic revolution. The West African bloc ECOWAS is actively discussing the long-overdue “Eco” currency as a challenge to U.S. and European monetary dominance.

African intellectuals and economists, including Kenyan professor PLO Lumumba, argue that political independence must coincide with economic sovereignty. This transformation is as much about identity and dignity as it is about financial transactions.

Recent calls in Italy and Germany to retrieve parts of their gold reserves from the United States highlight the underlying global uncertainty. Previously, the Bundesbank demonstrated its skepticism by recalling gold during the Obama administration. The potential for a second Trump presidency and his aggressive policies have further catalyzed these precautionary measures.

As the U.S. faces mounting national debt exceeding $36 trillion and annual interest payments surpassing $1 trillion, its reliance on the dollar’s reserve status to finance deficits is increasingly questioned. Unlike other nations, the U.S.’s monetary policy allows it to print dollars freely, maintaining an economic equilibrium others do not share.

Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz has repeatedly cautioned against the continuous exploitation of this “exorbitant privilege,” which seems unsustainable. Emerging economies bear the brunt of inflationary pressures resulting from U.S. monetary practices, enduring economic volatility not of their own making.

Ongoing military expenditures in Ukraine and Israel undermine confidence in American fiscal responsibility and the dollar’s stability. These conflicts, supported through deficit financing, amplify doubts about the sustainability of U.S. financial practices.

Despite this, over 58% of global reserves remain dollar-denominated, and nearly 90% of currency exchanges involve the dollar, underscoring its entrenched global presence. However, the strength of any currency fundamentally relies on trust, which appears to be waning. A shift toward a multi-currency global economy with regional financial systems is increasingly plausible.

The critical issue is not if but when the dollar will relinquish its supremacy. As former President Donald Trump proposes steep tariffs on BRICS nations, the path forward for the U.S. depends on whether it will embrace financial modernization or hold onto privileges that the world may soon leave behind.

Initially, the dollar’s dominance was built on U.S. moral authority and industrial strength, but the contemporary landscape has evolved post-COVID and post-colonization. Nations worldwide are redefining economic sovereignty, critiquing a financial system long perceived as biased toward Washington.

In 2025, the persistent conflict involving the Palestinian people has exacerbated global discontent, further tarnishing the U.S.’s moral standing. The de-dollarization movement represents a recalibration of global economic power, not a threat. The global south is no longer petitioning for change; it is materializing it. Continued U.S. intransigence risks forfeiting both its currency leadership and international influence.

As Sachs noted, reliance on force is unsustainable for global leadership. The global community is realigning, each nation asserting its place in the evolving financial landscape.

Source: Original article

JAINA Convention 2025 Highlights Unity in Chicago

The 23rd Biennial JAINA Convention held from July 3-6, 2025, in Schaumburg, Illinois, epitomized a global gathering of the Jain community, focusing on spirituality, culture, and unity with more than 5,000 participants from around the world.

JAINA Convention 2025 Highlights Unity in Chicago 2The 23rd Biennial JAINA Convention, hosted by the Federation of Jain Associations in North America (JAINA) in collaboration with the Jain Society of Metropolitan Chicago (JSMC), took place at the Renaissance Schaumburg Convention Center and Hyatt Regency in Schaumburg, Illinois. From July 3 to July 6, 2025, the convention gathered delegates from 72 Jain Centers across the U.S. and Canada, alongside attendees from 10 other countries including India, the UK, Germany, Oman, Dubai, and Kenya. Celebrated under the theme “Unity in Diversity: A Path to Peace,” this event highlighted Jain principles such as Ahimsa (non-violence), Anekantvad (multiple viewpoints), and Aparigraha (non-possessiveness).

The convention commenced on July 3 with registration and a memorable Temple Dwar Opening Ceremony,JAINA Convention 2025 Highlights Unity in Chicago 1 featuring Ashtapad—a unique creation showcasing 24 Tirthankaras—with sacred rituals and chants embracing the essence of Jainism. This was followed by the Exhibition Inauguration Ceremony displaying art, literature, and artifacts that emphasized the rich cultural heritage of Jainism.

A grand cultural procession in the South Parking area added to the vibrancy, with decorated vehicles and traditional dances performing under the banner of an overhead airplane marking the convention’s presence. The evening’s Opening Ceremony combined spirituality and artistry, welcoming delegates with blessings from renowned Jain spiritual leaders like Pujya Acharya Dr. Lokesh Muniji. A memorable performance of the Broadway-style production Sthulibhadra & Kosha—Nritya Natika, portraying Jain stories of love and renunciation, captivated the audience.

JAINA Convention 2025 Highlights Unity in Chicago 3 (1)Day two on July 4 began with calming yoga and meditation sessions, led by Samani Dr. Pratibha Pragyaji and Samani Punya Pragyaji, fostering inner peace among attendees. The day’s events included stirring speeches by JAINA President Bindesh Shah and JSMC President Pragnesh Shah, followed by a keynote by Pujya Dr. Gyanvatsal Swamiji on spiritual resilience. A variety of sessions included “મૈત્રીવાદ નો શંખવાદ” by Dr. Tej Sahebji and “The Most Urgent Act of True Ahimsa: What We Eat” by Dr. Faraz Harsini advocating for veganism.

The afternoon’s program included discussions on parenting within Jain principles led by Seema Jain, and a WomenJAINA Convention 2025 Highlights Unity in Chicago 3 Empowerment Forum featuring Judge Neera Bahl among others. Keynote presentations and sessions explored diverse themes such as ecological crises and crisis care, enriching attendees with knowledge and inspiration. A blood drive that started on this day exemplified Jainism’s commitment to compassion, potentially impacting 276 lives.

July 5, day three, saw a session with Jessica Cox, the world’s first licensed armless pilot, whose life story inspired many. Distinguished speaker Saman Shrut Pragyaji shared insights on living with compassion. The JAINA Awards recognized outstanding contributions within the community, awarding the prestigious JAINA Ratna to past president Mahesh Wadher of California.

JAINA Convention 2025 Highlights Unity in Chicago 3 (2)Attendees gained perspectives from sessions such as Digital Karma by Pinkesh Shah, exploring AI’s ethical dimensions, alongside unity and diversity topics. The evening culminated with cultural performances and a keynote by Bollywood icon Sonu Sood emphasizing charitable actions.

On the final day, July 6, meditation set a serene start to the day, with a closing ceremony that featured musical prodigy Sparsh Shah’s inspiring keynote, galvanizing attendees to embrace purpose and compassion in their lives. Conveners and JAINA leaders expressed gratitude to the volunteers, sponsors, and committees who ensured the convention’s success, highlighting crucial support roles such as that of the food committee led by Hitesh Shah and the transportation team.

JAINA, founded in 1981, connects over 200,000 members through its educational and humanitarian initiatives. Its reach and influence are further endorsed by USAID certification and UN Special Consultative Status. The event’s success reinforced the legacy of unity and collaboration within the Jain community. For more information, visit the original source.

Source: Original article

India, China Wealth Increased Through Rice Cultivation

Rice has long been central to economic growth in both India and China, fostering social structures that allowed entrepreneurial independence and later contributing significantly to the colonial economies through its adaptable cultivation.

Professor Emerita Francesca Bray of the University of Edinburgh, specializing in social anthropology, has explored the significant role of rice in historical agricultural societies. Her research reveals how rice cultivation shaped both the economic and social landscapes of regions, particularly in pre-colonial and colonial eras.

Initially delving into the history of agriculture in China, Bray’s interest broadened to agrarian networks and social systems, with a particular focus on rice due to its unique characteristics. Unlike global commodities like wheat and corn, which are traded and consumed internationally, rice is primarily consumed locally within the countries that produce it. This local consumption has kept rice fields smaller in scale and maintained a diversity of crops and occupations, unlike the standardized industrial monocultures prevalent with other grains.

This smaller scale of rice farming allowed for a deviation from feudal agricultural models. Many rice farms were managed by small-scale farmers rather than landlords, allowing them entrepreneurial freedom. As long as these farmers met rent obligations, they had autonomy and often evolved from tenants to landowners, a testament to the economic upward mobility facilitated by rice cultivation. In southern China and Malaysia, this system encouraged the accumulation of wealth within generations, as farmers frequently contributed taxes or reinvested into their own communities without the constraints of feudal labor systems.

Historian Roy Bin Wong’s work, “China Transformed,” challenges common characterizations of rice-based economies as less advanced than their Western counterparts. Bray highlights that the rice-centered economy of southern China evolved into a global economic powerhouse over centuries, developing sophisticated financial systems essential in global capitalism, even if it did not experience an industrial revolution akin to Europe’s.

With the onset of colonialism, rice became integral to the burgeoning global industrial economy. During the 18th century, it was a staple in the slave trade between West Africa and the Americas and became a primary food source for colonial workforces across the tropics. Rice cultivation expanded significantly under European colonial powers, who established export-driven rice zones in regions like Indochina and Indonesia. This expansion often displaced local markets and made rice a key commodity in supporting the global colonial labor force.

Colonial administrators imposed policies that formalized intensive labor practices, as noted by historian Peter Boomgaard. The expansion of rice fields often involved harsh conditions and tied workers to their labor through debt and cash taxes, a situation that later provided a foundation for the Green Revolution of the 1960s and 1970s.

Gender also played a significant role in rice production, differing from region to region. In China, traditional notions dictated that men worked the fields while women engaged in textile production at home, though the commercialization of the textile industry eventually saw more male participation. Despite many women working in rice fields, their contributions were underrepresented in historical records, highlighting a gendered perception of labor roles.

Rice’s historic and ongoing socio-economic impact in regions like India and China underscores its vital role in agricultural economies and its influence on broader global economic systems, according to Francesca Bray.

Source: Original article

World’s Wealthiest Family Worth $1.4 Trillion Outpaces Musk, Bezos

The House of Saud, the ruling family of Saudi Arabia, boasts a staggering net worth of $1.4 trillion, surpassing the combined fortunes of prominent billionaires Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos.

The world often turns its gaze toward the immense wealth of individuals like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mukesh Ambani, Mark Zuckerberg, and Warren Buffett. However, a royal dynasty quietly eclipses them all in terms of combined fortune—the House of Saud, the ruling family of Saudi Arabia. Originating not from the corporate or financial hubs of Silicon Valley or Wall Street, their wealth instead hails from the heart of the Middle East, where they govern one of the most resource-rich nations on the planet.

The House of Saud’s financial empire is vast, with a net worth estimated at a staggering $1.4 trillion (£1.1 trillion). This outsized fortune towers over other notable figures, with Musk’s net worth around $396 billion (£313 billion), and Bezos at $240 billion (£190 billion). Saudi Arabia’s royal family far surpasses each, maintaining wealth on an unmatched scale.

The source of this wealth is deeply rooted in oil. As the ruling family of the world’s largest oil-exporting country, they control one of Earth’s most valuable natural resources. Central to this is Saudi Aramco, the national oil company considered among the most profitable worldwide, significantly contributing to the family’s financial dominion. Yet, their wealth doesn’t reside solely in oil. The House of Saud has wisely diversified, investing in real estate, art, technology, and private business ventures, extending its reach far beyond its oil-rich borders.

There’s little secrecy about the opulent lifestyle maintained by the Saudi royals. Their assets are breathtaking, including private jets, mega-yachts, palatial residences, priceless art collections, and an array of exotic cars. Notably, the family owns the world’s largest private jet, a customized Boeing 747-400, renowned for its lavish interior. Royals ride in style, with some vehicles in their garage, like gold-plated Lamborghini Aventadors and Rolls-Royce Phantoms, tallying a worth of over $22 million. Al Yamamah Palace, the king’s residence, is an epitome of grandeur—reportedly containing over 1,000 rooms.

An expansive family, the House of Saud includes approximately 15,000 members, yet true power remains concentrated among about 2,000 close relatives. Spearheading this dynasty is King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, who ascended the throne in 2015. The king is one of the renowned “Sudairi Seven,” sons born to the favored wife of Ibn Saud, the kingdom’s founding leader. He is succeeded by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, known as MBS since 2017. MBS stands as a pivotal and sometimes polarizing figure, credited with Vision 2030—a sweeping reform initiative aimed at modernizing Saudi Arabia and reducing its economic dependence on oil. His tenure, however, has faced criticism regarding human rights concerns, involvement in the Yemen conflict, and the suppression of dissent. Despite these contentious issues, MBS’s wealth and opulent lifestyle are extraordinary, with assets such as the $400 million superyacht Serene featuring helipads, underwater observation areas, and lavish suites.

The Al Saud dynasty has governed Saudi Arabia for over 80 years, tracing its roots as far back as the 18th century. As one of the world’s oldest and most influential monarchies, the family seamlessly blends conservative Islamic governance with immense modern wealth. Unlike other royal families that often serve a symbolic role, the House of Saud remains actively engaged in governance, wielding influence over politics, religion, economics, and global affairs. This stands in stark contrast to the British royal family, whose financial worth and global influence, notably under the leadership of the late Queen Elizabeth II and now King Charles III, remain modest in comparison to the towering trillions managed by the Saudis.

Source: Original article

Trump Confronts Crisis Amid Epstein Conspiracy Theories

President Donald Trump’s efforts to downplay the controversy surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have failed to quell the demands for transparency from his supporters.

President Donald Trump faces increased pressure from supporters demanding the release of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking investigation. His attempts to minimize the issue and call off his supporters have done little to halt the uproar, a situation of his own making after years of promoting conspiracy theories.

The Justice Department and FBI recently announced that no Epstein client list existed, leaving many of Trump’s supporters feeling disillusioned and demanding further transparency. Trump responded by defending Attorney General Pam Bondi while criticizing reporters for inquiries about the documents.

While speaking to reporters during a flight back to Washington, D.C., Trump labeled the Epstein case as “pretty boring,” stating, “I don’t understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody.” Yet, his downplay of the situation contrasts with the significant interest in these documents among his followers.

Over the weekend, Trump attempted to redirect the focus away from Epstein. He urged his supporters on his Truth Social platform to shift attention toward investigating Democrats and criminals rather than dwelling on Epstein-related documents. However, right-wing figures such as Laura Loomer and Jack Posobiec continue to push for comprehensive disclosure of the files.

This political crisis underscores a broader challenge for Trump, who, throughout his political career, has cultivated a base attentive to conspiratorial narratives. Now in power, he faces the consequences of these narratives. Matt Dallek, a political scientist at George Washington University, noted, “The faulty assumption Trump and others make is they can peddle conspiracy theories without any blowback.”

Despite the Justice Department and FBI’s assertion that no client list exists, past statements by administration officials suggested otherwise, fueling conspiracy theories. Bondi had previously alluded to the existence of such documents but later clarified she was referring to Epstein’s case file in general.

Experts like Josephine Lukito from the University of Texas at Austin, caution that more transparency won’t necessarily alter the beliefs of those entrenched in conspiracy theories, as they often dismiss contradictory evidence.

The Epstein controversy presents an acute dilemma for the Trump administration. Trump and his allies in the administration, including FBI figures like Director Kash Patel, have historically allied themselves with such narratives, gaining significant political traction through them. But as the case revolves around tangible crimes by Epstein, additional transparency may either restore or undermine trust among Trump’s core supporters.

This issue extends beyond just political consequences. It highlights administrative challenges and inter-agency discord. There have been reports of intense discussions between Bondi and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino concerning their roles in handling the Epstein files. Laura Loomer claimed that Bongino is considering resignation amid this discord, highlighting the strain within Trump’s administration.

The Epstein case could prove costly for Trump’s broader political ambitions, according to critics like Steve Bannon, who warned that mishandling the situation might erode support from the MAGA movement. Some Democrats also suggest that Trump’s reluctance to release the files may be tied to the potential implications for himself or his close associates.

As the calls for transparency continue to resonate throughout political circles, the situation exemplifies the broader stakes of governance amid political theater. Trump finds himself at a crossroads where the maintenance of his political base competes with the imperatives of government transparency and accountability.

According to AP News, this controversy serves as a reminder of the intricate dynamics between political narratives and the expectations of truth among the electorate.

World Bank Allocates $80 Billion for Ukraine Reconstruction Efforts

The World Bank has mobilized $81 billion to aid Ukraine’s recovery, focusing on essential services, infrastructure repair, and future growth planning, amid ongoing conflict.

The Ukraine Recovery Conference took place in Rome from July 10-11, drawing government officials, international organizations, and financial institutions to discuss strategies for aiding Ukraine, a nation still gripped by conflict. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky attended the event alongside Anna Bjerde, Managing Director of Operations at the World Bank, who provided insights into the bank’s efforts in an interview with Vatican News.

Bjerde highlighted the World Bank Group’s extensive efforts over the past three years to support Ukraine amidst its ongoing crisis. The bank has not only provided substantial financial aid from its resources but also facilitated partnerships with Ukraine’s key development partners through platforms and trust funds directed at channeling further resources.

According to Bjerde, the World Bank’s efforts focus on three primary areas: supporting the Ukrainian government in delivering essential services such as education, healthcare, and social programs; aiding the swift recovery and repair of damaged infrastructure, particularly in sectors such as energy and housing; and engaging in thorough diagnostics and economic modeling to pinpoint areas primed for future growth. Altogether, the World Bank has mobilized approximately $81 billion in funding for Ukraine, incorporating both public and private resources.

The energy sector has been a critical area of focus, as noted by Bjerde. In February, the World Bank published its fourth damage and needs assessment for Ukraine, indicating that the country will require $524 billion over the upcoming decade for recovery and reconstruction. The assessment revealed a staggering 70% increase in damage to Ukraine’s energy infrastructure compared to the previous year. Efforts by the World Bank have prioritized supplying essential repair equipment and promoting renewable energy initiatives through private sector projects, notably in wind energy.

Trade in Ukraine has been severely disrupted due to the conflict and intermittent blockades of the Black Sea. The World Bank has played a key role in reinforcing railway and road infrastructure while simplifying trade processes. These measures have facilitated an increase in Ukraine’s export activity and attracted direct investment, a vital step towards economic stabilization.

Agriculture, another cornerstone of Ukraine’s economy, has benefited from direct World Bank support to local farmers, thereby boosting agricultural production and yields. This improvement not only bolsters Ukraine’s export capacities but also enhances food security and economic livelihood within the country.

Industrial activities have been similarly impacted by the war, with the World Bank concentrating on enhancing energy transport connectivity in collaboration with other partners and investing in infrastructure projects. Efforts are underway to provide access to finance, improve business environments, and de-risk investments to maintain operations. The resilience of Ukraine’s domestic private sector and state-owned enterprises has been a positive note amidst the challenges.

Bjerde also noted the importance of raising international awareness about Ukraine’s needs and the potential opportunities available for international companies looking to engage in trade and investment with Ukraine. The World Bank is assisting interested companies through various financial avenues, including trade finance and blended finance options, aiming to draw further investments and financial support.

While the economic and infrastructural challenges are significant, stories of resilience emanate from Ukraine. Bjerde shared her admiration for the people working on Ukraine’s railway system, a critical lifeline during the conflict, and the dedication of teachers, healthcare professionals, and officials. These individuals often operate under night-time conditions and in bomb shelters, driven by a shared sense of national identity and purpose.

Reflecting on her personal experiences in Ukraine, Bjerde expressed her awe at the bravery and determination she has witnessed, which not only inspires the World Bank team based in Kyiv but also fuels continued commitment to supporting Ukraine’s recovery and future growth.

The Ukraine Recovery Conference underscored the united international effort to assist Ukraine and highlighted the significant role the World Bank continues to play in catalyzing the nation’s comprehensive recovery strategy.

Indian H-1B Worker Cautions on US Property Purchase Risks

With interest rates on the rise, job insecurity, and changing immigration policies, an H-1B visa holder in the U.S. has ignited a debate, urging fellow Indians to reconsider buying a house.

An H-1B visa holder in the United States has sparked significant discussion on Reddit, cautioning others against purchasing property under the current economic conditions. The user’s post, shared on the subreddit r/h1b, carries the straightforward headline: “Please don’t buy a house in this environment. Just my advice of course.”

The Reddit user argues that, given the present market conditions, renting often appears to be a more financially prudent choice. This viewpoint is grounded in several factors currently affecting potential homebuyers, particularly those on visas, who might face additional challenges and uncertainty.

Rising interest rates are a primary concern, with potential homeowners facing higher mortgage costs that could stretch finances too thin. The user also points out job insecurity as another critical factor. Many individuals on visas are employed in sectors that could be vulnerable to economic shifts, which might jeopardize their financial stability and, in turn, their ability to maintain mortgage payments.

Adding to the financial considerations are the complexities of immigration policies, which continue to evolve. These policies can have far-reaching implications for those on work visas, further complicating decisions about long-term investments like homeownership.

The Reddit post outlines how, under these conditions, the traditional wisdom of purchasing a home as a secure investment might not hold true for everyone. Instead, renting provides more flexibility, enabling individuals to adapt more quickly to changing personal and financial circumstances.

This discussion comes at a time when potential homebuyers, particularly those on work visas, need to navigate a complex landscape of economic and policy-related challenges. By sharing their perspective, the user has encouraged others to carefully assess their situations and consider whether entering the real estate market is the right decision at this time.

Original insights like those shared on Reddit provide a valuable perspective for many, especially those facing similar situations, underlining the importance of community discussions in navigating today’s uncertain economic environment, according to Business Today.

Graham Staines Case Convict Converts to Christianity

In a remarkable transformation, Chengu Hansdah, a former juvenile convict involved in the 1999 murder of Australian missionary Graham Staines and his sons, has embraced Christianity, contrasting his past actions driven by religious animosity.

Aliganj, India – In a significant personal transformation, Chengu Hansdah, once convicted for his role in the brutal murder of Australian missionary Graham Staines and his young sons, has chosen to embrace Christianity. Hansdah was part of the mob that attacked the missionary and his family in January 1999 in Odisha’s Keonjhar district, setting fire to their vehicle as they slept. The incident, fueled by religious tensions, led to widespread condemnation both nationally and internationally. Once a juvenile offender, Hansdah served his sentence and was later released.

Hansdah’s conversion, reportedly beginning after his release, marks a profound shift from his earlier life. Local sources suggest that his new faith provided solace as he confronted the weight of his past actions. Social media posts highlight that his conversion is aligned with the forgiving message of Gladys Staines, widow of the missionary, who publicly forgave her family’s aggressors and hoped they would find faith in Jesus Christ. “Gladys Staines did not seek revenge but prayed that those responsible would also follow Jesus,” noted a post by @TheJonahProjec2 on X, highlighting the emotional gravity of Hansdah’s new path.

The baptism took place without much fanfare in a local church in Aliganj, attended by a small group of worshippers. Church members relay that Hansdah has become a regular at the services, often sharing his reflective journey from violence to redemption. “I was lost, but now I’ve found peace in Christ,” he reportedly mentioned at a recent church gathering.

This development has stirred mixed reactions. While some within the Christian community celebrate Hansdah’s conversion as a testament to the power of forgiveness and redemption, reflecting the grace shown by Gladys Staines, others remain cautious, given the severity of his past actions. Local authorities have not commented on Hansdah’s conversion, and he has consciously stayed away from engaging with the media.

The story unfolds amidst broader discussions in India about religious conversions, with varying reports of tension over potential coercion in certain regions. Recently, in Uttar Pradesh, Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath publicly denounced illegal conversions as a “conspiracy against the nation.” In contrast, Hansdah’s conversion appears more as a personal, voluntary change rather than a result of external pressures.

Hansdah’s journey highlights the intricate dynamics of faith, forgiveness, and reconciliation in a region characterized by its religious diversity and, at times, conflict. As he continues along his spiritual path, his story serves as a powerful reminder of the potential for personal transformation and the enduring impact of grace, even in the wake of profound tragedy.

India Gains Recognition in WHO Report for Ayush and AI

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recognized India’s innovative integration of artificial intelligence with traditional medicine, highlighting the country’s leading role in this field.

The World Health Organization has formally acknowledged India’s groundbreaking achievements in fusing artificial intelligence with time-honored medicinal traditions, marking a major milestone in the global acknowledgment of India’s Ayush-based healthcare practices.

This recognition comes after WHO released its technical brief titled “AI in Traditional Medicine,” which showcases India’s contributions to employing digital technologies within ancient medical systems. Following this recognition, the Ministry of Ayush noted that India’s proposal was instrumental in developing WHO’s first roadmap for incorporating artificial intelligence into traditional medicine approaches.

The report underscores how India’s initiatives signify an increasing dedication to marrying scientific innovation with centuries-old health systems. This includes India’s AI-driven programs which cover various applications across Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani, Sowa Rigpa, and Homoeopathy. Innovations in these areas involve diagnostic support systems that blend practices like pulse reading and tongue analysis with contemporary machine learning and deep neural networks.

Several digital platforms, namely the SAHI portal, the NAMASTE portal, and the Ayush Research Portal, are mentioned in the brief for their roles in advancing personalized, evidence-based care. A notable initiative cited is Ayurgenomics, which integrates genomics with Ayurvedic principles to aid in identifying disease markers and giving customized health advice through AI-based assessments.

The WHO brief also highlights initiatives aimed at exploring the genomic and molecular bases of herbal medicines, creating opportunities to repurpose traditional formulas for modern ailments.

Additionally, the WHO document commends India’s work in digitizing traditional knowledge, particularly referencing the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library. This resource sets a global standard for preserving and judiciously utilizing indigenous medical knowledge.

The document further mentions India’s broader strategies for boosting digital literacy among Ayush practitioners, expanding online consultation services, and developing systems to better integrate traditional and modern healthcare services.

The Ministry of Ayush has welcomed this recognition, seeing it as a significant step in establishing India’s traditional medicine systems within the frameworks of global digital healthcare—highlighting a blend of scientific precision and cultural preservation.

This acknowledgment signifies a landmark moment in international recognition for India’s efforts in advancing traditional medicine through innovative technologies, according to Indica News.

Source: Original article

US-India Trade Talks Aim to Reduce Tariffs Below 20%

The United States is pursuing an interim trade agreement with India that could lower proposed tariffs to below 20%, which may position India favorably compared to other nations in the region.

The United States is in the process of negotiating an interim trade deal with India, which may significantly reduce proposed tariffs to less than 20%, according to individuals familiar with the ongoing discussions. This development stands to elevate India’s status against its regional counterparts.

Unlike many other nations that have recently received tariff demand letters, India does not anticipate such a demand and expects that the trade arrangement will be formally announced through a statement. The interim deal would provide a framework for continued negotiations, offering New Delhi the opportunity to address unresolved issues before a broader agreement is potentially reached in the fall.

The anticipated statement is expected to set a baseline tariff under 20%, a reduction from the initially proposed 26%. However, the language within the statement is likely to allow for further negotiation of the rate as part of the final agreement. The precise timing of this interim deal remains uncertain.

If finalized, India would join a select group of trading partners that have secured agreements with the Trump administration. In contrast, numerous trading partners have been unsettled by recent announcements of tariffs as high as 50%, ahead of an August 1 deadline.

The Indian Ministry of Commerce and Industry, along with the White House and the Commerce Department, did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding this potential agreement.

New Delhi aims to secure terms more favorable than those in the recent agreement reached between the United States and Vietnam, which saw import duties set at 20%. Vietnam, surprised by this rate, is still attempting to renegotiate. Besides Vietnam, the UK is the only nation with which President Trump has announced a trade deal.

In an interview with NBC News, President Trump mentioned contemplating blanket tariffs of 15% to 20% for most trading partners. Currently, the global baseline minimum levy affecting nearly all US trading partners stands at 10%.

Thus far, announced tariff rates for Asian nations range from 20% for both Vietnam and the Philippines to as high as 40% for Laos and Myanmar.

India was among the first countries to engage the White House in trade talks this year; however, tensions have surfaced in recent weeks. Although President Trump stated that an agreement with India is nearing completion, he simultaneously threatened additional tariffs due to India’s involvement in the BRICS group. A delegation of Indian negotiators is expected to travel to Washington soon to advance these talks.

India has already presented its best offer to the Trump administration and outlined the limits it is unwilling to cross during negotiations. However, the two countries remain entrenched in disputes over several key issues, including Washington’s request for India to open its market to genetically modified crops, which New Delhi has opposed on behalf of its farmers.

Some contentious topics, such as non-tariff barriers in the agricultural sector and regulatory processes within the pharmaceutical industry, continue to prevent the two nations from reaching a consensus, according to those familiar with the matter.

Source: Original article

Justice Department’s Citizenship Revocations May Violate Constitutional Rights

The Trump administration is intensifying efforts to strip citizenship from naturalized Americans, targeting cases across ten broad categories, according to a recent Justice Department directive.

The Justice Department’s recent memo signifies a substantial policy shift, as it urges the department to “maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by evidence.” This move marks a distinct push to revoke citizenship on a massive scale, affecting naturalized Americans nationwide.

Denaturalization differs from deportation in that it involves a civil lawsuit that revokes a person’s U.S. citizenship, subsequently turning them back into noncitizens who can then face deportation. The government can pursue denaturalization if it can prove that an individual “illegally procured” their citizenship by failing to meet legal requirements or by committing fraud during the naturalization process.

The new directive promotes a “maximal enforcement” policy, effectively seeking denaturalization in any case where evidence supports such action, irrespective of the strength of the evidence or the priority level. This has led to instances like Baljinder Singh, whose citizenship was revoked after a name discrepancy, potentially the result of a translator’s error rather than fraudulent intent.

Historically, denaturalization was a rare occurrence until the 1940s and 1950s during the Red Scare, as suspicion of communism and Nazism prompted a surge in such cases. Between 1907 and 1967, over 22,000 Americans were denaturalized. However, the landmark Supreme Court case Afroyim v. Rusk in 1967 restricted the government from revoking citizenship without consent, except in cases involving fraud.

Since then, denaturalization was seldom pursued; from 1968 to 2013, under 150 individuals lost their citizenship, mainly due to concealed war crimes. The current approach stands in contrast with this history, sparking concerns among legal scholars about violations of constitutional rights.

In civil denaturalization cases, individuals lack access to free legal counsel, jury trials, and face a lower burden of proof—”clear and convincing evidence”—compared to criminal cases which require “beyond a reasonable doubt” proof. The absence of a statute of limitations allows the government to investigate cases irrespective of how long ago the alleged misconduct occurred.

The expansion of denaturalization has significant implications for democracy and societal security, as a core tenet of citizenship lies in its permanence. The fear that naturalized citizens might lose their status at any time undermines their full participation in American democracy.

The Justice Department’s directive outlines 10 categories for denaturalization, ranging from national security threats and war crimes to various frauds and financial crimes. This policy effectively creates two categories of American citizens: those born in the U.S., who face no risk of losing their citizenship, and naturalized citizens, who may remain vulnerable throughout their lives.

Individuals, such as a woman who became a naturalized citizen in 2007 and later faced potential denaturalization due to non-disclosure of a crime she was involved in unaware at her naturalization time, illustrate the precariousness of this policy. She cooperated with an FBI investigation and completed her legal sentence, yet decades later her citizenship was under scrutiny.

This intensified scrutiny could significantly impact approximately 20 million naturalized Americans, whose decades-old paperwork discrepancies might now threaten their citizenship status. The Justice Department’s move to “maximally pursue” denaturalization cases, alongside initiatives from the first Trump administration to re-evaluate over 700,000 naturalization files, represents a considerable escalation of efforts to rescind citizenship.

Constitutional challenges to this policy are anticipated, as they raise significant concerns about its alignment with the principles established in Afroyim v. Rusk, which underscored the inviolability of citizenship as a fundamental right.

As legal and academic critiques continue, the debate surrounding the policy’s implications unfolds, with broader consequences looming over the security and integrity of naturalized citizenship in America.

Source: Original article

Astronomers Find Unexpected Giant Planet Orbiting Tiny Star

Astronomers have discovered a giant exoplanet, TOI-6894b, orbiting a red dwarf star much smaller than the Sun, challenging current understandings of planetary formation.

A team of researchers, led by Edward Bryant of University College London (UCL), has identified a massive exoplanet named TOI-6894b. Remarkably larger than Saturn, this gas giant orbits a red dwarf star that possesses only one-fifth of the Sun’s mass. This unexpected discovery challenges existing theories on giant planet formation around small stars.

The exoplanet was found through a detailed review of data from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). Bryant expressed his enthusiasm about the discovery, stating that TOI-6894b is a significant find, marking the first giant planet discovered orbiting such a low-mass star. “We did not expect planets like TOI-6894b to form around stars so small. This discovery will be critical to understanding giant planet formation extremes,” he said.

The host star, smaller by 60% than the previously smallest known star to harbor a transiting gas giant, challenges the assumptions of planetary population estimates. Daniel Bayliss, a co-author from the University of Warwick, emphasized the significance of the finding. He noted, “Most stars in our galaxy are small, low-mass stars, previously thought incapable of hosting gas giants. Thus, this discovery drastically impacts our estimation of giant planet frequency within the galaxy.”

The current core-accretion theory, which suggests that planetary formation depends significantly on the mass and size of the protoplanetary disk, struggles to explain the existence of TOI-6894b. According to Vincent Van Eylen, another researcher at UCL, it’s puzzling how a low-mass star could create such a massive planet.

To explain this phenomenon, researchers are exploring alternative theories. Bryant proposed that TOI-6894b might have formed through an intermediate version of the core-accretion process or resulted from a gravitationally unstable disk collapsing to form the planet. However, neither explanation fully accommodates the observed data, leaving room for further investigation into the planet’s origin.

TOI-6894b orbits at a distance that keeps its atmosphere cool compared to other exoplanets, with an estimated temperature of around 420 Kelvin. Amaury Triaud of the University of Birmingham highlighted the potential for methane-dominated atmospheric chemistry, which is rare and highly significant for exoplanetary studies. TOI-6894b may also allow for the first detection of ammonia in an exoplanet’s atmosphere, making it an optimal candidate for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations. These findings could provide new insights into the composition and evolution of such atmospheres.

The implications of TOI-6894b’s discovery extend further, providing a new challenging model for planet formation. According to Andrés Jordán from the University Adolfo Ibáñez, the exoplanet presents a valuable opportunity for follow-up studies to characterize its atmosphere in detail.

The broader impact of this discovery suggests a potentially higher frequency of gas giants orbiting smaller stars than previously presumed. Such research endeavors, originating from institutions like the University of Warwick, UCL’s Mullard Space Science Laboratory, and the University of Birmingham, play a vital role in expanding our understanding of planet formation across the galaxy.

This study, outlining these findings, was recently published in the journal Nature Astronomy, underscoring the fluid and sometimes bold process of planet formation regardless of the celestial constraints.

Sachin Tendulkar’s Portrait Unveiled at MCC Museum

Sachin Tendulkar, a cricket legend and one of India’s greatest batters, has become the fifth Indian to have his portrait featured at the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) museum, commemorating his illustrious career and contributions to the sport.

Sachin Tendulkar’s portrait was unveiled at the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) museum just ahead of the third Test match against England at Lord’s, further cementing his legacy in the world of cricket. This milestone makes Tendulkar the fifth Indian cricketer to have this honor, joining the esteemed ranks of Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi, Kapil Dev, Bishan Singh Bedi, and Dilip Vengsarkar.

Renowned artist Stuart Pearson Wright crafted the portrait, which will remain in the MCC Museum before moving to the Pavilion later this year. Set against an abstract background symbolizing Tendulkar’s timeless influence, the artwork captures an image taken 18 years ago in Tendulkar’s Mumbai residence. Unlike previous full-length portraits of Indian cricketers, this piece highlights Tendulkar’s head and shoulders at a heroic scale, embodying gravitas and power.

Tendulkar expressed profound gratitude, stating, “This is truly special. It’s a huge honor. In 1983, when India won the World Cup, it was my first introduction to Lord’s. I saw our captain, Kapil Dev, lift the trophy.” He noted that the moment was pivotal in his cricketing journey, making the experience of having his portrait displayed at Lord’s particularly meaningful. Reflecting on his career, Tendulkar mentioned how this achievement made him smile and felt like life had come full circle.

Pearson Wright’s artistic collaboration with the MCC introduced a fresh perspective for Tendulkar’s portrait. “It was clear that MCC didn’t want this portrait to be in the same format as the previous Indian cricket portraits I made. A fresh approach was taken with this one,” said Wright, emphasizing the unique composition focused on Tendulkar’s countenance.

Additionally, Tendulkar had the honor of ringing the iconic Lord’s bell to signal the start of the third Test match against England, marking the first time he performed this ceremonial role. This event further embellished Tendulkar’s storied career, as the series itself is now named the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy in recognition of both his achievements and contributions to the game.

The Lord’s Portrait Programme has been a significant tradition for three decades, with MCC’s art and artifact collection dating back to the Victorian era and the museum opening in the 1950s as Europe’s oldest sporting museum. The Long Room Gallery remains one of the most venerable galleries in the world of sport.

According to World Malayalee Voice, holding a portrait at this historic venue carries a special significance, celebrating Tendulkar’s indelible impact on cricket for future generations to admire.

Source: Original article

Kerala Nurse Nimisha Priya Faces Execution in Yemen for Murder

Nimisha Priya, a nurse from Kerala convicted of murdering Yemeni national Talal Abdo Mehdi, is slated to be executed in Yemen on July 16, though last-minute efforts are underway to negotiate a reprieve.

Nimisha Priya has been incarcerated in Yemen for over three years following her conviction for the murder of Yemeni citizen Talal Abdo Mehdi in 2018. The news of her scheduled execution emerged on Tuesday, sparking new diplomatic efforts to save her life.

S.J. Bhaskaran, a negotiator, is preparing for an urgent trip to Yemen in a bid to intervene. Priya’s husband, Tomy Thomas, and their daughter remain optimistic about negotiating a payment of diya, or blood money, with Mehdi’s family, which is a legal avenue under Yemeni law to avert the execution. However, the victim’s family has yet to accept the proposal.

Priya, originally from Kollengode in Kerala’s Palakkad district, relocated to Yemen in 2008 to support her parents, who worked as daily wage laborers. She initially worked in several hospitals before eventually establishing her own clinic.

In 2017, a confrontation with her Yemeni business partner, Talal Abdo Mehdi, led to a tragic turn of events. According to her family, Priya injected Mehdi with sedatives hoping to retrieve her passport, reportedly confiscated by Mehdi. The sedative allegedly caused an overdose, resulting in his death.

Priya was apprehended while attempting to leave Yemen and was subsequently convicted of murder. In 2020, a trial court in Sanaa sentenced her to death, a verdict upheld by Yemen’s Supreme Judicial Council in November 2023. However, the court indicated that a resolution through blood money remains a possibility.

The case has garnered significant attention in India and among the Indian diaspora, raising concerns about the treatment and legal challenges faced by Indian nationals abroad. Priya’s mother, Prema Kumari, 57, has actively campaigned to save her daughter’s life, even traveling to Sanaa to plead with Mehdi’s family for clemency.

Support has also come from the Save Nimisha Priya International Action Council, consisting of non-resident Indian social workers in Yemen, who are advocating for a diplomatic and humanitarian solution.

With the execution date looming, efforts are intensifying to broker a last-minute agreement that could potentially spare Priya’s life.

According to IANS, the situation remains precarious with less than a week to find a solution.

Source: Original article

US Imposes $250 Visa Fee for Tourists, Students from 2026

Indian nationals traveling to the United States will face a significant increase in visa-related costs starting in 2026, as part of a broad immigration overhaul under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Indian nationals traveling to the United States for tourism, education, or temporary work will soon face a significant increase in visa-related costs.

Beginning in 2026, a new $250 “Visa Integrity Fee” will be levied on most non-immigrant visa categories under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1), which was signed into law by U.S. President Donald Trump on July 4.

The surcharge will apply to B-1/B-2 tourist and business visas, F and M student visas, H-1B work visas, and J-1 exchange visas, among others. Only diplomatic visa classes (A and G) are exempt.

The fee will be collected by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) at the time of visa issuance and is framed as a refundable security deposit. To be eligible for a refund, travelers must comply with all visa conditions—such as departing the U.S. within five days of expiration or adjusting their immigration status legally—and submit the required documentation.

The $250 charge is in addition to existing costs. The current $185 Machine-Readable Visa (MRV) application fee remains unchanged, but applicants will also be required to pay a $24 I-94 surcharge for entry/exit tracking.

Those using the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) or Electronic Visa Update System (EVUS) will incur additional fees of $13 and $30, respectively. For Indian travelers, the total cost of obtaining a U.S. visa could rise to approximately $480, effectively doubling current expenses.

The new surcharge is part of a broader immigration overhaul under the One Big Beautiful Bill, which allocates $150 billion through 2029 for expanded immigration enforcement.

The legislation increases funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), expands detention infrastructure, accelerates deportations, and limits asylum access. These measures will be partially funded through higher visa fees and a new 1 percent tax on foreign remittances, according to the Immigration Advocacy Project.

While the DHS maintains that the Visa Integrity Fee will promote compliance and deter overstays, critics argue that the fee disproportionately burdens applicants from countries like India, which sees high demand for U.S. visas. Education providers, technology employers, and travel industry representatives have warned that the increased financial burden may discourage students and skilled workers from choosing the U.S.

Estimates suggest that the new visa and related fees could generate $64 billion through 2034, contributing to federal tax and enforcement funding—but at a substantial cost to immigrant communities.

Source: Original article

Dr. Lokesh Edara Presented with Ravindranadh Guttikonda Lifetime Achievement Award By TANA Foundation

Dr. Lokesh Edara, an eminent physician and a past Chair of the BOT of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) was presented with Ravindranadh Guttikonda Lifetime Achievement Award by Telugu Association of North America (TANA) Foundation in “recognition of your exceptional and sustained contributions to community service, medical education, and public health,” during a solemn ceremony in Novi, Michigan on July 3, 2025.

“Your unwavering commitment, leadership, and compassion have made a lasting impact and exemplify the values this award honors,” said Sasikanth Vallepalli, Chair, TANA Foundation.

In his response, after receiving the prestigious award, Dr. Edara, said, “I am deeply honored and humbled to receive the Ravindranadh Guttikonda Lifetime Achievement Award for Community Service from the TANA Foundation, and TANA. This recognition holds special meaning for me, as it comes from a community and organization that I deeply respect and cherish.”

Dr. Edara, a Board-Certified Physician in Allergy and Immunology in Private Practice since 1990, said, “Throughout my career, I have been guided by the belief that service to others is one of the highest callings. Whether through community outreach, medical education, or public health initiatives, I have simply tried to give back in ways that uplift lives and strengthen our shared future.”

Dr. Edara completed his Fellowship in Allergy & Immunology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia. Dr. Edara, who immigrated to USA in1983 from India, serves as an  Assistant Professor at WMU School of Medicine Kalamazoo, Michigan. Dr. Edara is the former President of Michigan Allergy Asthma Society and a former President of the Calhoun County Medical Society and was the President of the Association of Allergists and Immunologists from India from 2001-2003.

Dr. Edara is a former House of Delegate at the American College of Allergy Asthma Immunology and served as the Chairman of AAPI Global Medical Education 2023-2024. Dr. Edara has been collaborating with the Government of India on efforts with “the objective of making every MBBS graduate from India to be the best in the world through programs and activities on AAPI platform.”

Beyond his impressive clinical credentials, Dr. Edara’s service to TANA has been truly exceptional. He served the organization in multiple capacities including as the Treasurer,  Chairman of the TANA Foundation for 3 years, and was the founder of TANA Foundation India.

During his leadership, Dr. Edara was instrumental in obtaining FCRA approval for the TANA Foundation India, enabling the organization to execute charitable projects on a larger scale. His vision led to the establishment of multiple water purification plants, mobile eye camps, and lifesaving surgical programs across Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.

 His commitment did not end with his tenure. Even after serving as Chairman, Dr. Edara continues to initiate and support numerous initiatives.

His global work in medical education include founding the Global Association of Indian Medical Students. He helped launch The Global Journal of Medical Students (GJMS) and continues to advocate for emergency medicine training in India. He published research papers on digital medical education and pandemic response strategies.

In addition, Dr. Edara has has served as the President, Michigan Allergy Asthma Society; President, Calhoun County Medical Society; President, Association of Allergists and Immunologists from India (2001–2003); House Delegate, American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (2021–2022); Chair of Global Medical Education, AAPI

A scholar and dedicated to sharing his skills and knowledge with the rest of the world, Dr. Edara has published numerous articles in addition to contributing multiple-choice assessments in undergraduate and post graduate medical education in India. A strong advocate for eLearning systems, Dr. Edada believes that “They are a vital active learning tool for medical education to help higher transfer of knowledge, which helps in public health.”

A strong advocate to make mandatory Emergency Medicine Department in all the 701 Medical Schools in India, Dr. Edara is proud to state that “This is now approved by the Government of India and the Indian Medical Association and that now all the Medical Colleges in India are establishing Emergency Medicine Department.:

Dr. Edara is the Co-Founder of the Indian Resuscitation Council Federation (IRCF) along with Dr. Chakra Rao, and has worked for the last 5 years with IRCF, and is now serving as a Council Member of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). 

His passion has been enhancing of medical education. He cofounded a medical student association called “Global Association of Indian Medical Students (gaims.org). Dr Edara was instrumental in establishing the Global Journal of Medical Students (www.thegjms.org).

He has been instrumental in the Concept Proposal for Nationalized Formative and Summative Assessments to Enhance the Preparedness of Medical Students for the National Exit Test (NExT) and Solution for Low Resource Countries, with insights from NBME Examinations in the USA.

A proven leader and dedicated to the health and wellbeing of Indians, Dr. Edara says, “I have been the Chairmen of TANA   Foundation, the largest Telugu Association in the United States. I established with Tana leadership, The Tana Foundation for India, a nonprofit organization  in India over a decade ago with the FCRA approval from the Government of India. The Foundation has been carrying out several charitable programs in India, spending millions of Dollars.”

Dr. Edara plans to continue with the advocacy to have the best emergency medical health system while promoting post-graduation in Emergency Medicine and EMT BSE Training across India. In addition, he wants to advocate to have the Indian medical service to help global medical education.

While expressing his appreciation to TANA, one of the largest associations of the Indian Diapora community in North America, Dr. Edara said, “I am grateful to the TANA Foundation for this meaningful honor, and I accept it on behalf of all those who have inspired, supported, and worked alongside me. Together, we have made a difference—and together, we will continue to do so. Thank you for this profound recognition.”

Dr. Kiran Dhanireddy Led Team Performs First Ever Bloodless Heart-Liver Transplant

Transplant surgeons from USF Health and Tampa General Hospital (TGH) have successfully completed the world’s first bloodless heart-liver transplant, a groundbreaking procedure that marks a significant milestone in the field of transplant surgery.

Dhanireddy Kiran 02 web
Keck School of Medicine faculty member and director of Pancreas Transplantation, Kiran Dhanireddy, MD, has been appointed chief medical officer of USC Care.

Dr. Kiran Dhanireddy, vice president and chief of the USF Health and Tampa General Hospital (TGH) , and Dr. Gundars Katlaps, surgical director of the lung transplant program, both of whom are also associate professors at the USF Health Morsani College of Medicine, have achieved an unprecedented medical milestone. The team was able to perform the complex surgery without the use of blood products, making it the first recorded instance of a bloodless heart-liver transplant.

The operation underscores the importance of academic medical centers in advancing complex medical treatments. Charles J. Lockwood, MD, MHCM, executive vice president of USF Health and dean of the Morsani College of Medicine, emphasized the value of academic medical centers in providing specialized care for patients with limited options. “Our physicians have the expertise to provide complex care for patients who have no other options,” Lockwood stated. He praised the innovative problem-solving and multidisciplinary care that enable better health outcomes at academic institutions, and expressed pride in the leadership demonstrated by TGH’s physicians.

In a message posted on LinkedIn, Dr. Kiran Dhanireddy said, “Today marks a monumental milestone in my career—I am proud to announce we have successfully performed the world’s first bloodless heart-liver transplant—a groundbreaking achievement that reflects the unmatched expertise and innovation of our academic health system. Now we’ve made history with a global first. Number 1 is no longer just a title—it’s a trajectory. We have positioned ourselves as the place where complex problems are not just faced—but solved. This historic success is a testament to the brilliant, relentless, and compassionate teams who continue to push boundaries and reimagine what’s possible in patient care. We’re not just setting the bar—we’re raising it.”

Kiran Dhanireddy MD holds multiple leadership roles at Tampa General Hospital, including Vice President of the TGH Transplant Institute and Surgical Director of Liver Transplant. Additionally, Kiran serves as Executive Director of the Advanced Organ Disease & Transplantation Institute and Associate Director of the same institute. Since January 2022, Kiran has also been the Vice President of Medical Affairs at University of South Florida Tampa General Physicians. Kiran earned a Doctor of Medicine degree from Georgetown University from 1996 to 2000 and a Bachelor of Science in Biology from the same institution from 1992 to 1996.

John Couris, president and CEO of Tampa General Hospital, echoed these sentiments, noting the significance of the academic setting in facilitating access to cutting-edge technology and research. “As a true academic health system, our transplant team has access to cutting-edge technologies, innovative techniques and the latest research available,” Couris remarked. This commitment to academic excellence contributed to the Transplant Institute’s reputation as a leader in the field, attracting patients from across the nation seeking solutions to complex medical conditions.

The patient, diagnosed with both coronary artery disease and fatty liver disease as part of metabolic syndrome, had waited more than 18 months for this groundbreaking procedure. Given the need to avoid blood products, the transplant team undertook the challenge of performing a bloodless dual-organ transplant, a rarity in medical practice.

Dr. Dhanireddy highlighted the achievement as a testament to the capabilities of academic medicine, which allowed for the assembly of a team with unparalleled expertise. “The success of this first-of-its-kind procedure is a true testament to the power of academic medicine,” he said. The procedure demonstrated meticulous surgical technique and coordinated perioperative care, which are crucial in delivering optimal outcomes for patients. Dr. Dhanireddy noted that unfortunately, many patients lack access to such resources, needing to travel significant distances and face delays in care, but TGH aims to provide equitable care for patients both locally and nationwide.

While bloodless transplant surgery has existed since the first single-organ transplant in 1986, it remains uncommon in most health systems. The discipline is evolving, with the first bloodless heart-kidney transplant recorded earlier this year. As the frequency of these surgeries increases, so does the overall success and survival rate for patients.\

Beyond accommodating patients with medical contraindications or religious beliefs that preclude blood transfusions, research shows that minimizing the use of blood products has benefits such as faster recovery times and reduced infection risks. These advantages have led to advocacy for patient blood management programs aimed at optimizing the use of a patient’s own blood where possible.

Dr. Katlaps emphasized that patients already face numerous challenges, including delays and inequities in organ allocation and lack of access to specialized care. “A patient’s inability to receive blood products — whatever the reason — should not be one of them,” he stated. His team takes pride not only in making medical history but also in offering lifesaving care previously unattainable elsewhere.

According to USF Health, this historic surgery signifies a leap forward in transplant medicine, showcasing the potential for academic institutions to pioneer innovative solutions for patients worldwide.

Indian Diaspora to Explore Tech-Driven Education Reform

A groundbreaking event titled “One Tablet: Infinite Futures” will convene in Burlington, MA, focusing on the transformative role of the Indian diaspora in advancing education in India through innovation and technology.

A discussion on the future of education in India is scheduled to take place on July 23, 2025, at the Burlington Marriott in Burlington, MA. Dubbed “One Tablet: Infinite Futures,” the event will bring together leading academics and changemakers to explore the transformative potential of the Indian diaspora in enhancing education in India.

Moderated by Satish Jha, a former editor of the Times of India Group and an influential advocate for education reform, the panel will feature notable figures like Prof. Ujjayant Chakravorty from Tufts University and Prof. M.S. Vijay Kumar from MIT. The conversation will revolve around practical strategies to leverage diaspora expertise for the betterment of India’s educational infrastructure and learning outcomes, particularly in underserved regions.

A key highlight of the event is the success story of Vidyabharati Schools, a nationwide network educating about 1% of India’s student population while regularly capturing more than half of the top 10 rankings in state board exams. This exemplifies scalable, inclusive, and high-impact education.

Distinguished Panelists:

Prof. Ujjayant Chakravorty: An economist at Tufts University focusing on sustainable systems and development, Prof. Chakravorty will offer insights on how India’s educational infrastructure can be enhanced through data-driven policies and resource optimization.

Prof. M.S. Vijay Kumar: As the Executive Director of J-WEL South Asia and a trailblazer in education technology at MIT, Prof. Kumar will discuss the transformative capacity of digital tools like OpenCourseWare and edX to make high-quality education accessible to a wider audience.

Satish Jha (Moderator): A seasoned journalist and educational advocate, Jha brings years of experience in analyzing and influencing India’s educational policies and systems.

What to Expect:

The panel will explore how knowledge transfer, investment, and strategic partnerships can fuel educational reform in India. The event will aim to identify actionable, technology-driven strategies to replicate the success of models like Vidyabharati across the country. There will also be a focus on digital equity, emphasizing the potential of initiatives such as “One Tablet: Infinite Futures” to make digital learning tools accessible, particularly in rural and low-income communities.

Event Details:

Date: July 23, 2025
Location: Burlington Marriott, One Burlington Mall Road, Burlington, MA 01803
Time: 5:30 PM to 10:00 PM

Registration is open to educators, policymakers, diaspora members, and the media. Those interested can register through this link.

This initiative seeks to transform Indian education through innovation and technology. By highlighting educational success stories and mobilizing diaspora resources, the program aims to ensure that every child in India has the opportunity to excel in a digitally connected world.

About the Vidya Bharati Leadership Reception & Gala:

The Boston event is organized by the Indus Education Empowerment Foundation, a registered U.S. nonprofit with 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, in collaboration with Aashraya, Edufront, and The Jha Group. The reception will spotlight Vidya Bharati’s transformative work and celebrate its impact across 88% of India’s districts.

About Vidya Bharati USA: Vidya Bharati USA aids Vidya Bharati Sansthan in reaching new heights through the introduction of digital learning.

About Vidya Bharati Sansthan: As the world’s largest non-governmental education network, Vidya Bharati operates over 14,000 formal schools and nearly 10,000 informal education centers, providing both academic and value-based education to over 3.3 million students across India. The organization has been a launchpad for future doctors, engineers, civil servants, and social leaders.

Source: Original article

Trump Announces Tariffs on Copper and Pharmaceutical Imports

President Donald Trump has announced a new 50% tariff on all copper imports into the United States, though the timeline for its implementation remains uncertain.

President Donald Trump declared on Tuesday that a 50% tariff will be imposed on all copper imported into the U.S., continuing his administration’s pattern of leveraging tariffs as a strategic tool. However, details regarding when this new tariff will take effect are not yet clear.

“Today we’re doing copper,” Trump stated during a Cabinet meeting, indicating his administration’s decision to set the tariff at 50%.

This initiative marks the fourth broad-based tariff imposition by Trump in his second term. Previously, the administration set tariffs of 25% on imported cars and car parts, alongside 50% tariffs on imported steel and aluminum.

The White House has not yet provided CNN with any information about the timeline for enacting the copper tariffs.

The decision to impose a copper tariff follows a Section 232 investigation initiated in February, leveraging a legal framework that authorizes the president to impose tariffs for national security reasons.

Copper is integral to the manufacturing of numerous goods, including electronics, machinery, and automobiles. Imposing tariffs on copper could potentially elevate the cost of these goods for American consumers. Last year, the United States imported $17 billion worth of copper, according to data from the U.S. Commerce Department. Chile emerged as the largest supplier, exporting $6 billion worth of copper to the U.S. in 2024.

Following Trump’s announcement, copper prices soared to unprecedented levels. Copper futures in New York spiked by as much as 15%, reaching a record high of $5.68 per pound.

“I’ve been surprised it’s taken this long to get the copper tariff,” Ed Mills, a Washington policy analyst at Raymond James, remarked to CNN.

This year, copper prices have surged by 38%, reflecting a tendency to stockpile the metal in anticipation of tariff hikes.

“A 50% increase will be a massive tax on consumers of copper,” commented Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank. “Watch what Trump does, not what he says,” Hansen advised, suggesting that a staggered tariff approach might be adopted to mitigate its impact on consumers.

In addition, Trump announced impending 200% tariffs on pharmaceuticals, noting that these could be delayed to incentivize pharmaceutical companies to relocate their operations to the U.S.

Although the president had exempted pharmaceutical imports from tariffs during his first term, he has been vocal about implementing such measures, citing national security concerns. An investigation into pharmaceutical imports commenced in mid-April, potentially paving the way for these tariffs.

Trump argues that increasing domestic pharmaceutical production is crucial for reducing reliance on foreign medicine supplies. Several pharmaceutical companies have announced plans to expand their manufacturing capacities within the U.S., some of which were initiated prior to Trump’s second term beginning in January.

The announcement of possible pharmaceutical tariffs prompted a reaction from Australia’s Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, who stated that the country is “urgently seeking” more details about this development given its potential impact on billions of dollars in exports to the U.S.

Additionally, on Monday, Trump extended a pause on “reciprocal” tariffs until August 1. These tariffs, originally set to resume in April, were scheduled to restart at 12:01 a.m. ET on Wednesday. In the interim, Trump has been actively communicating with foreign leaders about potential new tariff rates, pending further negotiations.

This article has been updated to include additional context and recent developments, according to CNN.

China Offers Visa-Free Entry to Boost Tourism

China has significantly expanded its visa-free entry policy, allowing citizens from 74 countries to visit for up to 30 days without a visa, a move aimed at boosting tourism and the economy.

Foreign tourists are gradually returning to China following the nation’s unprecedented relaxation of its visa policy. The Chinese government now permits citizens from 74 countries to enter without a visa for up to 30 days, a major change from previous rules. This strategic move aims to enhance tourism, invigorate the economy, and increase China’s soft power on the global stage.

In 2024, more than 20 million foreign visitors traveled to China without a visa, accounting for nearly one-third of the total international arrivals and more than double the previous year’s figures. These numbers were reported by the National Immigration Administration, affirming the policy’s early success.

Travelers and industry professionals are already feeling the impact. “This really helps people to travel because it is such a hassle to apply for a visa and go through the process,” said Georgi Shavadze, a Georgian national residing in Austria, while visiting the Temple of Heaven in Beijing.

While domestic tourists still dominate China’s major attractions, travel businesses and tour operators are preparing for an influx of foreign arrivals, particularly in the upcoming summer season. Experienced tour guide Gao Jun, who has over two decades of expertise, expressed his enthusiasm and challenges: “I’m practically overwhelmed with tours and struggling to keep up.” In response to this surge, Gao has initiated a new venture aimed at training aspiring English-speaking tour guides to meet the increasing demand.

Having relaxed its strict COVID-19 protocols, China reopened its borders to tourists early in 2023. However, only 13.8 million visitors ventured to China in that year, significantly fewer than the 31.9 million recorded in 2019, the last full year before the pandemic.

Since December 2023, China has expanded this visa-free privilege to travelers from countries like France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and Malaysia, among others. Europe has seen the most significant extension, with almost all countries included. Last month, additional countries in Latin America and Uzbekistan joined the list, with countries from the Middle East following suit. Azerbaijan’s upcoming inclusion will bring the total to 75 countries.

About two-thirds of these countries are part of a one-year trial basis, allowing governments and travelers to assess the process.

For travelers like Norwegian Øystein Sporsheim, this policy shift removes the burdensome need for multiple trips to embassies to secure travel visas, a particular relief for families managing complex logistics.

Jenny Zhao, managing director of WildChina, a company specializing in high-end travel experiences, emphasized the advantages. “The new visa policies are 100% beneficial to us,” Zhao noted. Her business has surged by 50% compared to pre-pandemic levels. Although the U.S. continues to be their largest market, the proportion of European clients has grown substantially, reaching 15–20% from less than 5% before 2019.

Similarly, Shanghai-based Trip.com Group reported significant gains attributed to the visa-free policy. Travel-related bookings through their platform doubled in the first quarter of this year compared to last, with 75% of new visitors originating from regions with visa-free status.

Despite the broad expansion, no major African country is currently part of the visa-free entry arrangements, though China maintains close relationships with countries across the continent.

For nationals of 55 countries not included in the broader visa-free list, China offers a transit policy. This allows for a 10-day entry provided travelers depart to a different destination than the one from which they arrived. The policy is applicable at 60 points of entry, specifically benefiting individuals from the Czech Republic, Lithuania, Sweden, Russia, the United Kingdom, Ukraine, Indonesia, Canada, the U.S., and Mexico, which are not on the 30-day visa-free list.

Among high-income European nations, Sweden joins the U.K. in not securing 30-day visa-free access, a situation reflecting diplomatic strains, including the controversial case of Swedish national Gui Minhai, who was sentenced to a decade in Chinese prison.

China’s ambitious visa policy appears to be achieving its goals, rejuvenating the tourism sector while fostering international connections and welcoming a more diverse group of visitors to explore its vast cultural and historical landscapes.

Malayalam Cinema Report: Hyped Movie Disappoints, Mohanlal-Mammootty Dynamics Shift

The first half of 2025 proved a mixed period for Malayalam cinema, with notable successes and significant disappointments marking its journey.

The first six months of 2025 demonstrated a period of fluctuating fortunes for Malayalam cinema. While 2024 was a year of consistent triumphs in the industry, the recent period has been marked by both high-quality productions and underwhelming failures, indicating that success in the film industry is never guaranteed. Numerous factors contribute to the rising and falling fortunes of an industry, and Malayalam cinema is no exception.

The year started with high expectations following the successes of 2024, but it got off to a slow start with the release of “Identity,” an action thriller by directors Akhil Paul and Anas Khan, which failed to impress audiences due to its lackluster writing and weak performances from stars Tovino Thomas and Trisha Krishnan. Smaller releases like “Communist Pacha Adhava Appa” and “ID: The Fake” made little impact, while the alternate-history thriller “Rekhachithram,” directed by Jofin T Chacko and starring Asif Ali, quickly became a notable success.

In contrast, technical prowess occasionally shined through, as seen in “Rekhachithram,” where innovative use of AI technology helped overcome budget constraints. Meanwhile, high-budget films struggled with issues such as poorly executed visual effects, evident in releases like “The Greatest of All Time” starring Thalapathy Vijay, Kamal Haasan’s “Indian 2,” and Mohanlal’s “Barroz.” These issues contrasted sharply with the disciplined craftsmanship that allowed directors like Jofin T Chacko to succeed.

The year continued unevenly as stalwarts of Malayalam cinema experienced fluctuating success. Mammootty, following a run of successes, faced a downturn with “Dominic and the Ladies’ Purse,” directed by Gautham Vasudev Menon. On the other hand, Mohanlal reversed his string of disappointing releases with “L2: Empuraan” and “Thudarum,” generating more favorable outcomes at the box office.

February mirrored the unevenness of the year, failing to replicate the golden run of February 2024, and instead delivering a lackluster slate of releases including “Painkili,” “Bromance,” and “Daveed,” which struggled to connect with audiences. Kunchacko Boban and Priyamani’s “Officer on Duty” found some success despite mixed critical reception.

March traditionally sees fewer releases due to academic exams and Ramadan, but “L2: Empuraan” emerged as a blockbuster despite initial critical feedback regarding its script and controversial themes. The film eventually became the highest-grossing Malayalam film of all time.

April was another mixed month, with inconsistent performance from films such as Mammootty’s “Bazooka” and Basil Joseph’s “Maranamass,” the latter overshadowed by Khalid Rahman’s sports comedy “Alappuzha Gymkhana.” Meanwhile, May saw a lineup that included forgettable titles like “Mr & Mrs Bachelor” and “Azadi.” The dance drama “Moonwalk,” with its fresh approach, stood out among the releases, echoing broader appeals for Bollywood to reassess its formulaic approaches.

The final month of the half-year, June, saw another wave of underperforming films such as “Written & Directed by God” and “Abhyanthara Kuttavali.” However, the police procedural drama “Ronth,” directed by Shahi Kabir, garnered praise for its incisive storytelling and impressive performances, underscoring the industry’s capability for high-quality productions.

As Malayalam cinema moves forward into the latter half of the year, the industry must navigate its precarious position with strategic planning in both film production and distribution. While the first half of the year has highlighted some remarkable successes, it also reinforced the need for improved planning and promotional strategies to ensure more stable performance moving forward, according to Indian Express.

Green Card Holders Affected by Trump’s Immigration Bill

The One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB), signed into law by President Donald Trump, is set to significantly impact green card holders and legal immigrants by restricting access to some health benefits and imposing new taxes on overseas remittances.

President Donald Trump’s recently signed One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) introduces measures that could heavily impact legally present immigrants, including those holding green cards, by changing how they access certain health benefits and imposing a new tax on money sent abroad.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the OBBB will lead to 11.8 million more Americans being uninsured by 2034 and will increase the federal deficit by almost $3.3 trillion over the next decade. This legislation could result in 1.3 million lawfully present immigrants losing their health insurance by 2034, according to the CBO. Trump signed the bill into law on July 4.

Under current U.S. policy, lawful permanent residents, refugees, survivors of domestic violence, and individuals on valid work or student visas can purchase insurance through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace. Many of these groups qualify for federal tax credits that help reduce monthly insurance premiums, while others may be eligible for Medicaid or Medicare, based on income and other criteria.

The OBBB, however, intends to limit access to these benefits. It may prevent some lawfully present immigrants from benefiting from federal health insurance subsidies. Immigrants most affected could include low-income green card holders still within the five-year waiting period for Medicaid along with refugees and survivors of domestic violence, who may face a loss of subsidized health insurance.

If the bill is fully enacted, only green card holders, select individuals from Cuba and Haiti, and some Pacific Island communities would continue to receive federal benefits. Most immigrant groups, regardless of legal status, could lose access to affordable healthcare options.

Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies at the Cato Institute, commented on the bill, noting that immigrants consume fewer government-supplied health benefits compared to native-born Americans. Nowrasteh views the bill as a start to widen this gap, suggesting it could benefit taxpayers without adversely affecting the health of excluded non-citizens.

In addition to healthcare changes, the OBBB will introduce a 1 percent tax on remittances sent overseas, impacting millions of immigrant families who send financial support to relatives in their home countries. Supporters of the measure argue it could generate significant federal revenue, but critics point out it places a financial strain on low to middle-income workers reliant on these remittances to support their families abroad.

The legislation also allocates significant funds to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), including $45 billion to expand detention capacities to nearly 100,000 beds, $14 billion for transportation and deportations, and $8 billion for hiring 10,000 additional deportation officers.

Veronique de Rugy, a Senior Research Fellow with the Mercatus Center, highlighted the economic implications of the tax on remittances, explaining that it effectively reduces household income, potentially pushing families back into poverty and damaging local economies.

Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, emphasized that the OBBB aims to protect vulnerable Americans by eliminating waste and fraud in Medicaid and fulfilling President Trump’s campaign promise to strengthen border security and deport criminal illegal aliens.

Conversely, John Slocum, Executive Director of Refugee Council USA, expressed concerns about the bill’s potential to reverse decades of bipartisan support for newcomer integration. He warned that refugees and immigrant families could face significant hardships, impacting their recovery and integration into U.S. communities.

The OBBB’s enactment might result in hundreds of thousands of lawfully present immigrants, including asylum seekers, trafficking survivors, and refugees, losing access to ACA marketplace coverage, with the elimination of subsidies that help make healthcare premiums more affordable.

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty: A Visionary Leader with Over Two Decades of Dedicated Service to AAPI, Poised to Propel the Organization to New Heights

oplus 1179698Dr. Amit Chakrabarty: A Visionary Leader with Over Two Decades of Dedicated Service to AAPI, Poised to Propel the Organization to New Heights

“Unity is our strength—collaborating and presenting a united front is the challenge I am determined to overcome.”

“AAPI is the only organization in the United States that truly represents physicians of Indian origin,” says Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, who assumed office as the President of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) during a historic oath-taking ceremony at AAPI’s national headquarters on July 3, 2025. The ceremonial gavel transfer will follow later this month at AAPI’s 43rd Annual Convention in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty’s Vision to Unite AAPI: Bridging Divides and Building Trust

“We have the potential to make a significant impact on the healthcare landscape of this country,” Dr. Chakrabarty asserts. “My goal this year is to unify AAPI by transcending the regional divides that have hindered our progress in recent years. Indian American physicians represent tremendous talent and potential, and the key to realizing that lies in collective action and a united voice—something I am committed to fostering.”

As he steps into this leadership role, Dr. Chakrabarty pledges to work toward strengthening and expanding AAPI, which represents the interests of over 120,000 Indian American physicians. The Alabama-based urologist envisions a future where AAPI becomes “more vibrant, united, transparent, and politically active,” with increased membership and a stronger presence among younger physicians. He emphasizes the importance of ensuring that “AAPI’s voice is heard in the corridors of power.”

Dr. Chakrabarty’s journey with AAPI spans more than two decades—from a devoted “foot soldier” since 1997 to now leading the largest ethnic medical organization in the U.S. He refers to AAPI as his “second family,” a community he deeply cherishes and is honored to serve.

“Since joining AAPI as a patron member in 1997, I have dedicated myself to its mission,” says Dr. Chakrabarty, Consultant Urologist at Urologic Clinics of North Florida, former Chairman of the Urologic Clinics of North Alabama, and Director of the Center for Continence and Female Pelvic Health. “As the President, I will lead from the front. If members see my dedication, hard work, and transparency, I hope they will stand with me and help make this a successful year for AAPI.”

Dr Amit Chakrabarty Oath

On his plans to unify AAPI, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, a Bengali born and raised in Odisha, expresses both optimism and determination. “I have the unique advantage of having earned the trust of many regional groups within AAPI—especially those that have been at odds in recent years,” he says. “My history of honest, transparent leadership and my ability to reach across the aisle give me hope that I can help build bridges and strengthen AAPI’s unity and foundation.”

A Gandhian at heart, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty firmly embraces the timeless principle of “Satyameva Jayate” — Truth alone triumphs. Reflecting on his journey, he shares,
“I am a Bengali from Odisha, and I have lived and served in smaller AAPI chapters like Alabama and Missouri. I have no particular state or chapter allegiance; instead, I take pride in bridging divides and forging friendships across all regions and backgrounds, a trait that brought me to the pinnacle of this esteemed organization. My circle includes friends from every corner of AAPI and beyond, and I actively participate in diverse ethnic festivities, as my friends in Huntsville can certainly attest.”

A recipient of the National AAPI Distinguished Service Award (2018) and the President’s Award for Services (2019) from the Indian American Urological Society, Dr. Chakrabarty considers leadership both as a passion and a strength. “I see myself as a motivator. I lead by example, and that energy tends to inspire others. I’m fun-loving by nature, and I’ve always chosen to push through challenges rather than let them define me.”

Amit 7

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty – AAPI Champion and Tireless Leader

Since joining AAPI, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty has been a steadfast leader and advocate, serving the organization with unwavering dedication for over 25 years. A Patron Member and long-standing Governing Body Member, he has impacted nearly every aspect of AAPI without bias or personal agenda.

He served two terms as Regional Director (2004–2006), was a Trustee (2017–2020), and chaired or co-chaired key committees including Ethics & Grievances, Journal Resources, Website, Alumni, Membership, Bylaws, IT, and the Charitable Foundation—helping expand its free clinic reach in the U.S. and India.

At the chapter level, Dr. Chakrabarty revitalized both the Alabama and St. Louis chapters, leading them from dormancy to becoming two of AAPI’s most active branches. Under his leadership, Alabama produced 13 of the last 15 Regional Directors, while St. Louis hosted a record-setting Governing Body Meeting, attended by the largest number of past presidents and BOT chairs.  He holds the rare distinction of conducting three AAPI Governing Body meetings—two in Alabama and one in St. Louis.

He has also helmed specialty organizations, including the Indian American Urological Association and the Society of Indian American Clinical Urologists, and has played key roles at AAPI’s Global Health Summits in Odisha, Kolkata, and Hyderabad. To date, he has attended over 100 AAPI events worldwide.

Beyond AAPI, Dr. Chakrabarty has led cultural and community organizations across Alabama and at present serves as the Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Hindu Cultural Center of Huntsville.  He led the Indian Delegation to Japan in 1985, the International Youth Year, on the invitation of the Government of Japan.  From negotiating stipends for medical residents in Delhi as the President of the Resident Doctors’ Association, to shaping the future of Indian American physicians, his leadership spans continents and generations.

Amit 2

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty’s Vision: Shaping the Future of AAPI

As he takes the helm of AAPI—one of the most respected and enduring ethnic physician organizations in the United States—Dr. Amit Chakrabarty has laid out a bold and forward-thinking agenda for the organization’s future. His vision focuses on advocacy, global engagement, and empowering the next generation of physicians. Key priorities include:

  1. Combating Physician Burnout and Addressing the Green Card Backlog:
    Dr. Chakrabarty is committed to advocating for meaningful reforms to alleviate the growing crisis of physician burnout and tackling the long-standing immigration hurdles, especially the Green Card backlog, that disproportionately affect Indian-origin doctors.
  2. Establishing a Robust and Well-Funded Political Action Committee (PAC):
    Recognizing the power of political advocacy, he plans to build a strong and strategically funded AAPI-PAC to effectively lobby for physician-related policy changes and increase the organization’s influence at the state and national levels.
  3. Global Partnerships in Healthcare Education:
    Dr. Chakrabarty envisions AAPI as a global leader in medical education and innovation, promoting collaborations with international institutions to advance healthcare standards, training, and access across borders.
  4. Participation in Global Health Policy-Making:
    AAPI, under his leadership, will seek a greater voice in shaping healthcare policies within global institutions such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations, particularly on issues affecting South and Southeast Asia.
  5. Investing in the Future: Empowering Medical Students, Residents, and Young Physicians (MSR/YPS):
    Emphasizing the need for generational continuity, Dr. Chakrabarty aims to heavily invest in the MSR/YPS section, offering them leadership roles within mainstream AAPI and integrating them into all levels of organizational planning and programming.
    “Without the active involvement of our young physicians, there will be no AAPI 20 years from now,” he warns. “We must cultivate their leadership now and give them the platform to shape the organization’s future.”

Amit 8

AAPI’s Financial Future: Dr. Chakrabarty’s Vision in Action

Ensuring AAPI’s financial strength is a top priority for Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, who brings over 20 years of hands-on fundraising success to the table.

“Fundraising is my passion,” he says. “I’ve consistently raised funds for AAPI and causes we care deeply about.”

A few highlights of his efforts include:

  • Leading the 9-city Talat Aziz Tour for Hurricane Harvey relief & Leukemia Society
  • Organizing the Pankaj Udhas Show supporting AAPI scholarships and childhood obesity awareness
  • Organizing and conducting Geetanjali Music benefit concert for Puerto Rico hurricane relief
  • Helped with Sukhwinder Singh Tour (2022), Shreya Ghosal Show (2018), Hema Malini Concert (2003 and 2004)
  • $100,000 scholarship fund for Indian urologists through the Indian American Urology Association
  • Geetanjali music concert raised over $600,000+ in two successive years for the Hindu Temple of St. Louis
  • Multiple fundraisers to eliminate a $1.3 million debt for the Hindu Cultural Center of North Alabama

Many of these events were initiated, funded, and organized personally by Dr. Chakrabarty—including his original concept “DADA vs DADA”, a tour planned to benefit the AAPI Charitable Foundation in 2005, which was later on, canceled due to Hurricane Katrina.

“Philanthropy has been part of my life since childhood,” he says, citing school fundraisers and musical performances as early outlets for his service spirit. That passion continues today through his work with his own musical group Geetanjali Music, which has headlined numerous AAPI benefit events.

Investing in the Future: Empowering Young Physicians

Equally crucial to Dr. Chakrabarty is the active inclusion and empowerment of AAPI’s younger members, particularly the Medical Students, Residents, Fellows (MSRF), and Young Physicians (YPS) section. “If we don’t actively engage our young physicians today, AAPI risks becoming irrelevant in the next two decades,” he cautions.

He strongly advocates for giving MSR/YPS greater visibility and leadership roles within the organization, beginning with the national convention.

“One of the prime-time evening sessions at the main convention should be entirely managed and led by the YPS team. It will not only boost their confidence but also reinforce their connection to the parent organization,” he suggests.

Through strategic fundraising and empowering the next generation, Dr. Chakrabarty envisions an AAPI that is not only financially secure, but also vibrant, inclusive, and future-ready.

Advancing AAPI as a Global Health Leader

Amit 6Dr. Amit Chakrabarty envisions a future where AAPI stands as a globally respected, politically empowered, and socially impactful force in healthcare. His international vision includes:

  • Strengthening global health education partnerships
  • Delivering economic and material aid to underserved communities
  • Securing
  • AAPI’s seat at the policy table of WHO and the UN, particularly on South Asian health issues

“My goal is for AAPI to be recognized as a global health leader,” he affirms. He plans to revitalize AAPI’s philanthropic efforts through greater visibility and accountability.

“The AAPI Charitable Foundation has done vital work over the last 20 years in supporting free clinics in India—but we must better support and showcase our philanthropic efforts,” he says.

To expand AAPI’s global footprint, Dr. Chakrabarty proposes creating an AAPI Global Foundation—focused on innovation, research, education, and health policy—while the AAPI Charitable Foundation continues to provide direct clinical care in India. Together, these arms will drive AAPI’s mission of improving healthcare locally and worldwide.

Leading by Action: “Help India Breathe”

During the COVID-19 crisis, Dr. Chakrabarty launched Help India Breathe under his ApShiNi Ventures initiative—delivering critical aid when it was needed most. While national organizations like AAPI relied on government distribution, Dr. Chakrabarty independently ensured life-saving equipment reached underserved hospitals and small clinics across India.

“ApShiNi directly supported nonprofit and remote hospitals and clinics—where the need was greatest,” he explains. Thanks to rigorous coordination, ApShiNi volunteers delivered nearly 2,400 co-ventilators and 1500 high-capacity oxygen concentrators to these remote areas and also frontline defense outposts. (www.apshini.org)

Dr. Chakrabarty also served as the founding president of the Odisha Doctors’ International Association (ODIA), leading unified efforts to provide medical aid and amplify Odisha’s healthcare needs globally. He continues to represent Odisha in AAPI’s national leadership.

Amit 5

Dr. Chakrabarty – A Multi-Talented Leader

Physician, performer, and passionate visionary, Dr. Chakrabarty is as much an artist as a healer. He founded AAPI’s Got Talent (2010) and the beloved Mehfil segment (2008), bringing music, laughter, and community to AAPI’s annual conventions.

Chair of the AAPI Entertainment Committee and a founding member of the Geetanjali Music Group, he has helped raise funds through music while sharing the stage with his talented daughter and nephew (www.geetanjalimusic.com)

Driven by joy and resilience, he says, “I love people and celebrating life… if life gives me lemons, I make lemonade!” His passions also extend to stand-up comedy, cricket, travel, and outdoor cooking—reflecting a vibrant spirit deeply connected to culture and community.

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty – A Scholar, Surgeon, and Innovator

Board-certified urologist and Chairman of the Urologic Clinics of North Florida, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty has practiced adult and pediatric urology across three continents for over 30 years. He also leads the Center for Continence and Female Pelvic Health and serves as primary investigator at UCNA Research.

 

Dr Amit Chakrabarty

A top graduate of MKCG Medical College in India, Dr. Chakrabarty earned multiple gold medals and the Pfizer Medallion for academic excellence. He completed his Master of Surgery at PGIMER Chandigarh, followed by a surgical fellowship at the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh—mirroring the path of his father, a pioneering surgeon in Odisha. After moving to the U.S., he completed a urology residency and uro-oncology fellowship at Wayne State University.

Dr. Chakrabarty’s clinical focus includes female urology, urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, BPH, and male hypogonadism. He is a surgical proctor and global speaker on cutting-edge treatments, and has published widely on urinary health and hormonal disorders. His research helped lead to FDA approval of Vibregon, a treatment for overactive bladder.

As an educator, he remains an active contributor to AAPI CME programs. His passion for learning and teaching is deeply rooted in the example set by his father. Dr. Chakrabarty has mentored students at several institutions and has authored multiple medical publications.  He regularly contributes to AAPI’s CME programs and workshops, and has been awarded membership to the AAPI Distinguished speakers’ Club.

A physician known for his compassion, brilliance, and unwavering dedication, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty has consistently excelled in every role he has undertaken—both within the medical community and in public service. His leadership is not only defined by professional excellence, but also by a deep commitment to humanitarian causes, education, and global health equity.

With confidence born of extensive experience, Dr. Chakrabarty states, “Having served as a member and leader of AAPI for over two decades, I have honed the skills necessary to advance the organization. My mission is to leave a legacy of work that people will remember fondly and proudly long after I am gone.”

Amit 3

Family Support

Dr. Chakrabarty credits his success to his wife of 38 years and their three daughters. His eldest, a breast oncology surgeon and AAPI-MSRF member, also shares his musical and philanthropic spirit. “My family has stood by me through every step,” he says. “This year, I’m committed to giving back even more to AAPI—and leaving a legacy that honors both my parents and my journey.”

About AAPI

The influence of physicians of Indian heritage continues to grow significantly across the United States. Increasingly, physicians of Indian origin occupy critical roles in healthcare delivery, academia, research, and administration nationwide. As physicians of Indian origin, we take immense pride in our remarkable achievements and contributions—to our motherland India, our adopted home the United States, and in fostering the transformative Indo-US relationship.

Representing one in every seven patients in the U.S., AAPI members care for millions of individuals daily. Many have risen to prominent leadership positions, shaping policies, programs, and innovations that impact healthcare both nationally and globally.

“Since its founding in 1982, AAPI has been at the forefront, uniting more than 125,000 practicing physicians across the country to serve as the collective voice of Indian-origin physicians,” said Dr. Satheesh Kathula. “We remain committed to this noble mission and will continue strengthening our efforts to propel AAPI to even greater heights.”

 Among AAPI’s standout leaders is Dr. Amit Chakrabarty—respected for his clinical excellence, humanitarian work, and commitment to global health equity. “With over two decades in AAPI leadership, I aim to leave a legacy that inspires pride and lasting impact,” says Dr. Chakrabarty. For more information, please visit www.amitforaapi.com

Musk Plans New Political Party After Trump Tax Dispute

Elon Musk announced the formation of the America Party following a split with President Donald Trump over the president’s new tax cuts law, marking a potential shift in the political landscape.

BRIDGEWATER, N.J. — Elon Musk has made good on a previous declaration to establish a new political party, revealing the launch of the America Party in response to President Donald Trump’s recently enacted tax cuts law. This move comes as Musk distances himself from Trump, with whom he previously had close political ties.

Musk’s departure from the Republican president’s support was initiated by dissatisfaction with the tax legislation, which Trump signed on Friday. The bill’s approval by Congress prompted Musk to threaten the creation of the “America Party,” expressing his concern about excessive government spending.

“When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,” Musk stated on X, the social media platform he owns. “Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.”

On Sunday, as Musk prepared to leave his New Jersey residence for a return to Washington, Trump addressed the media regarding Musk’s new party, dismissing the idea as “ridiculous.” Trump highlighted the Republican Party’s significant achievements, while also suggesting that third parties historically introduce confusion.

While new political parties are not uncommon in the U.S., they often struggle to draw substantial support away from the major Republican and Democratic parties. However, Musk, being the world’s richest individual, has the potential to influence the 2026 congressional elections if he chooses to allocate substantial financial resources to the America Party. Musk has previously invested at least $250 million backing Trump in the 2024 election.

The renewed discord with Trump could have significant ramifications for Musk, as several of his business enterprises, including Tesla, benefit from substantial government contracts. The lack of clarity regarding the formal establishment of the America Party remains, as spokespeople for Musk and his political action committee, America PAC, have not commented.

Notably, several political entities listed in the Federal Election Commission database appeared after Musk’s announcement on Saturday, including variations of “America Party” names or affiliations with Musk. However, many were not legitimate, with contact information appearing as unverifiable addresses.

Moreover, on Sunday morning, Musk engaged users on X, gathering insights on the America Party and indicating plans to participate in the 2026 midterm elections. Last month, Musk expressed intentions to challenge every congressional member who supported Trump’s tax legislation, criticizing it as a “disgusting abomination.”

His critique extended to the expanded federal deficit and criticized the Republican Party, which controls the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, for enlarging the government and national debt by five trillion dollars.

Musk’s decision to form a political party reflects a significant change from his stance in May when he indicated an intention to reduce political engagement as his tenure in the White House closed.

Scott Bessent, Treasury Secretary, and former Doge boss, acknowledged on CNN’s “State of the Union” that Musk’s principles resonated with some, but noted polling suggested Musk himself was not popular. “I imagine that those board of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities,” Bessent remarked.

Source: Original article

Texas Floods Prompt Debate on Impact of Job Cuts in Forecasting

Following torrential rains and flash floods in Texas Hill Country, President Trump’s staffing cuts to the National Weather Service (NWS) are under scrutiny, with critics raising concerns about the impact on disaster preparedness and response.

The National Weather Service (NWS) is facing criticism in the wake of a catastrophic weather event that claimed the lives of at least 80 people in Texas, with a significant number being young girls and counselors at a summer camp along the Guadalupe River. Torrential downpours and sudden floodwaters ravaged the Texas Hill Country on Friday night, prompting questions about the adequacy of weather forecasting and warnings provided during the disaster.

The weather event has brought attention to staffing reductions within the NWS, with former federal officials and experts having previously warned that President Donald Trump’s significant cuts to the agency could jeopardize public safety. Despite these concerns, the majority of officials in the Republican-dominated state have refrained from directly attributing the tragic outcomes to the staffing cuts.

As the thunderstorms intensified Thursday night, five staff members were on duty at the NWS office responsible for the affected region—consistent with the number typically available during expected severe weather conditions. Defending the agency’s efforts, current and former NWS officials highlighted the timely issuance of urgent flash flood warnings, including a catastrophic flash flood warning issued before the river rose significantly.

“This was an exceptional service to come out first with the catastrophic flash flood warning and this shows the awareness of the meteorologists on shift at the NWS office,” stated Brian LaMarre, who retired in April as the meteorologist-in-charge at the NWS forecast office in Tampa, Florida. LaMarre noted the challenges in precisely predicting extreme weather but commended the urgent response provided by the meteorologists.

Despite the timely warnings, concerns remain about the level of coordination between the NWS and local officials during the night of the disaster. The Trump administration’s downsizing initiative has reduced staffing by at least 20% at nearly half of the 122 NWS field offices across the country, and several offices no longer maintain around-the-clock staff. In addition, numerous forecasters and senior managers were prompted to retire early.

The Trump administration has also proposed a 27% reduction in the budget for the NWS’s parent agency, potentially affecting research centers dedicated to weather, climate, and ocean studies. In the Austin/San Antonio office, which oversees the severely impacted Kerr County, six of 27 positions remain unfilled. This includes a pivotal management role responsible for coordinating emergency responses with local officials, left vacant following the former employee’s departure in April after mass retirement encouragements.

In response to the devastating incident, Democratic leaders have demanded clarity on the staffing changes. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer pressed the Trump administration for an investigation into the possible contribution of staffing shortages to the “catastrophic loss of life” in the area.

President Trump, addressing the situation, stated that the reduction in jobs did not impair weather forecasting capabilities. He described the sudden floods as an unforeseen event, stating, “The raging waters were a thing that happened in seconds. No one expected it. Nobody saw it.”

According to AP News, despite the debate over staffing and preparedness, the tragic events have highlighted the need for comprehensive review and potential restructuring to ensure effective warning and response mechanisms in future disasters.

Source: Original article

Indian Applicants Face US Visa Appointment Challenges Despite Consulate Interviews

Since the U.S. consulates in India resumed F-1 student visa interviews, applicants still face chaos, with scarce appointments and growing uncertainty threatening their educational plans.

Despite the resumption of F-1 student visa interviews at U.S. consulates in India on June 26, students continue to struggle with securing appointments, leading to significant anxiety and uncertainty.

As students prepare for the start of their courses in August, they face the challenge of obtaining visa appointments in a timely manner. The lack of available slots, coupled with the increase in 221(g) administrative processing notices, is jeopardizing their plans and investments.

LaunchEd co-founder Kajal Dave described the situation as “a mess,” pointing out that many students who have already paid tuition, booked flights, and found housing are unable to secure visa appointments. The financial implications are severe, with potential losses estimated to range between ₹12 and ₹35 lakh, covering tuition fees, housing deposits, and airfare if students cannot travel in time and their universities do not permit deferrals.

One student expressed their frustration and panic online, stating that visa slots in India have not been opened, leaving them feeling lost and hopeless as their course is set to begin on August 20.

Another student shared a similar concern, saying their university recommended deferring enrollment to the next fall due to these issues. The additional concern of receiving a 221(g) notice after securing an interview adds further uncertainty, as visa approvals remain on indefinite hold.

The U.S. Embassy website has recently cautioned that student or exchange visitor visa applicants without existing appointments may not be able to schedule an interview this summer, amplifying students’ worries.

This situation follows a month-long visa freeze from May 27 to June 26, hitting the peak student season and compounding broader systematic issues. According to a report by Business Standard, these challenges stem from a substantial backlog and an evolving adjudication policy, with increased scrutiny over digital footprints and social media causing further delays.

Currently, the wait time for appointments in India averages 45 to 60 days, with Kolkata experiencing the longest delays. As a result, many students are missing important university start dates.

Experts recommend that students facing these challenges can apply for emergency appointments through UStraveldocs or consult with their university’s Designated School Official (DSO) regarding deferral or temporary online study options. Ensuring that Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) and I-20 documents are up to date is also crucial if deferring is necessary.

The root of the current slot shortage combines the aforementioned visa freeze during a critical period and stricter visa vetting processes implemented in recent years. While students may request emergency appointments via the official UStraveldocs website, they must provide appropriate university documentation to support their application.

The U.S. Embassy has not confirmed if additional bulk slot openings will occur before the August 2025 intake, leaving students uncertain about future opportunities to secure their visas in time.

According to Business Standard

Source: Original article

Pope Leo XIV Approves Eco-Friendly Mass Initiative

Pope Leo XIV has approved a new Mass emphasizing environmental stewardship, amid Europe’s ongoing heat waves and wildfires.

As Europe faces unprecedented heatwaves, resulting in soaring temperatures, wildfires, and fatalities, the Vatican took a significant step toward environmental consciousness by unveiling a new liturgy for Mass on Thursday. This revised Mass specifically addresses the church’s responsibility to protect the planet, incorporating prayers, readings, and hymns aligned with this mission.

During a press conference, Cardinal Michael Czerny, who leads the Vatican’s Dicastery for Integral Human Development, expressed that the new Mass “can be used to ask God for the ability to care for creation.”

The Mass, titled Pro Custodia Creationis (For the Care of Creation), was initially conceptualized by Pope Francis, who consistently emphasized ecological responsibility throughout his papacy, notably in his 2015 encyclical, “Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home.” Pope Leo XIV appears poised to continue this focus on the environment, marking a continuity with his predecessors’ social concerns. He plans to privately celebrate the new Mass at Borgo Laudato Si’, an ecologically-minded village project initiated by Francis, located within the gardens of the papal summer residence at Castel Gandolfo, on Wednesday.

The new Mass will join the list of 17 existing Masses dedicated to specific civil needs, such as those for the harvest, rain, and migration, drawing inspiration from Francis’ “green” encyclical, which marks its 10th anniversary this year.

A collaborative effort between the Dicastery for Integral Human Development and the Dicastery for Divine Worship, the Mass is inspired by St. John Paul II’s 1990 World Day of Peace message that highlighted the relationship between humanity and the environment. Cardinal Czerny noted, “In a world where the most vulnerable of our brothers and sisters are the first to suffer the devastating effects of climate change, deforestation, and pollution, care for creation becomes an expression of our faith and humanity.”

Monsignor Vittorio Francesco Viola, the secretary of the Vatican’s liturgical department, explained that the Mass begins with an entrance antiphon that themed around “the glory of God” as revealed through creation. This liturgical celebration reaches its pinnacle during the Eucharist, concluding with a post-Communion prayer reflecting humanity’s intrinsic connection to God, neighbors, and the Earth—a relationship disrupted by sin, as discussed in “Laudato Si’.”

In this Mass, readings from the Gospel of Matthew illustrate God’s care for “the lilies of the field and the birds of the air,” and recount Jesus calming the storm, emphasizing believers’ responsibility to safeguard the environment. These readings challenge interpretations of Genesis that support human dominion over nature for personal gain.

Cardinal Czerny remarked, “This Mass is a reason for joy,” adding that it “calls us to be faithful stewards of what God has entrusted to us—not only in daily choices and public policies but also in our prayer, our worship, and our way of living in the world.”

The unveiling of Pro Custodia Creationis underscores the Vatican’s commitment to integrating environmental stewardship into religious practice, spotlighting the interconnection between spirituality and ecological responsibility.

According to Religion News Service, this initiative reflects the Vatican’s acknowledgment of the pressing need for faith communities to actively engage in promoting environmental care.

Tesla CFO Taneja Appointed Treasurer of Musk’s Political Party

Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja has been appointed as treasurer of the newly established America Party, founded by Elon Musk in response to recent political developments.

Tesla’s Chief Financial Officer Vaibhav Taneja, originally from India, has been named treasurer of Elon Musk’s America Party, according to documents filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC). This appointment comes as a part of Musk’s political initiative launched in early July following his disagreement with President Donald Trump over the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’.

The FEC filing reveals that the headquarters of the America Party is located at 1 Rocker Road in Hawthorne, California. Taneja’s responsibilities within the party encompass the roles of both treasurer and custodian of records, with his Tesla-affiliated address appearing in the official paperwork, which has since been circulating on social media.

The inception of the America Party was officially announced by Musk shortly after Trump enacted the controversial bill. Reflecting Musk’s proactive approach to political engagement, he posted on the platform X, formerly known as Twitter, stating, “By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.” As of now, Musk remains the party’s sole declared candidate.

In his new role as treasurer, Taneja will be in charge of the party’s financial oversight. His duties involve managing contributions, monitoring expenditures, and ensuring adherence to federal campaign finance regulations. This critical role requires him to maintain meticulous records of all financial transactions and prevent any illicit financial activities.

Vaibhav Taneja assumed the role of CFO at Tesla in August 2023, succeeding Zach Kirkhorn. Taneja possesses extensive expertise in corporate financial management, having joined Tesla in 2017 through its acquisition of SolarCity. Prior to becoming CFO, he served as Tesla’s Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller.

Before his association with Tesla, Taneja had a noteworthy career at PricewaterhouseCoopers spanning nearly 17 years, where he provided consultancy services to major corporations regarding financial strategy and regulatory compliance.

His appointment as treasurer of the America Party highlights his significant experience and trusted position within Musk’s ventures, as he takes on a pivotal role in navigating the financial dimensions of this newly formed political entity.

Trump’s Bill Reduces Remittance Tax for Indians to 1%

President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act has advanced in the Senate, featuring a reduced 1% tax on remittances, offering relief to Indian professionals and non-resident Indians (NRIs) in the U.S.

In a significant development for Indian professionals and non-resident Indians (NRIs) in the United States, President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act has managed to surmount a major hurdle in the Senate, now offering a considerably lowered remittance tax of 1%. This development is seen as a substantial relief from the originally proposed 5% tax rate, which had initially drawn widespread concern.

The updated draft of the bill now implements a mere 1% tax on remittances sent via cash, money orders, or cashier’s checks. This marks a substantial reduction from the 5% rate proposed in May, which was later downscaled to 3.5% in the House version of the bill. The reduced tax rate applies to remittance transfers not made through financial institutions or using a debit or credit card issued in the United States.

The initial draft of the bill passed by the House of Representatives in May caused alarm among many Indian professionals due to its high proposed tax, affecting non-U.S. citizens, including those on Green Cards and temporary visas like H-1B and H-2A. Remittances comprise a significant component of India’s foreign income, making the tax rate particularly relevant for Indian nationals residing abroad.

Data from the Migration Policy Institute, as cited by The Times of India, indicated that approximately 2.9 million Indians were living in the U.S. as of 2023, making them the second-largest foreign-born demographic in the country. Additionally, the World Bank reported in 2024 that India was the largest recipient of international remittances, accumulating $129 billion, with 28% of these remittances originating from the U.S.

In light of these statistics, the remittance policy is pivotal for states like Kerala, Uttar Pradesh, and Bihar, where remittances are a crucial financial lifeline for millions of households.

Despite the remittance tax relief, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes contentious elements such as a $150 billion increase in military spending, mass deportation measures, and funding for a border wall. To offset these expenses, the bill proposes substantial cuts to federal programs, including Medicaid and incentives for clean energy, inciting opposition from various political factions, including divisions within the Republican Party itself.

This policy proposal has led to public disagreements, notably between President Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who lashed out at the bill as “utterly insane,” cautioning that it would jeopardize millions of American jobs.

The flag-bearing piece of legislation narrowly passed a Senate vote by 51-49, pushing it forward for further Senate discussions. According to Al Jazeera, President Trump aims to see the bill enacted by Congress before the Fourth of July.

Source: Original article

Americans4Hindus Urges FBI Probe into ISKCON Utah Gunfire Incidents

Americans4Hindus has expressed grave concern over recent gunfire incidents at the ISKCON Temple in Utah, which may be hate crimes targeting the Hindu community in the United States.

Americans4Hindus, an advocacy group, has raised alarms following nighttime gunfire occurrences at the ISKCON Temple in Utah. These incidents, suspected to be targeted attacks, underscore the vulnerability of Hindu places of worship and might be classified as hate crimes against the Hindu minority in the country.

In response to these unsettling events, the organization stands with the ISKCON community and commends the Utah County Sheriff’s Office. The local law enforcement agency has shown agility in dealing with the situation by increasing patrols to safeguard the temple and its worshippers.

Dr. Romesh Japra, the Founder and Chairman of Americans4Hindus, called for a comprehensive federal response. “Given the rising trend of temple vandalism and Hindu hate crimes—including acts of violence—we strongly urge the FBI to launch a thorough and transparent investigation. We call on FBI Director Kash Patel and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to ensure that such heinous incidents receive the appropriate federal attention and action,” he declared.

This call to action is part of the organization’s broader commitment to upholding the civil and religious rights of Hindu Americans, making sure that their sacred spaces are protected and respected nationwide.

The advocacy group has been a vocal supporter of safeguarding minority religious rights, pointing out the crucial need for vigilance and appropriate measures to deter hate crimes.

The original source reporting these concerns is Americans4Hindus, a prominent voice in advocating for Hindu Americans’ rights and interests.

Source: Original article

Banks and Telecom Surpass Tech in H-1B Visa Hiring

Major banks and telecommunications companies have surpassed technology giants as the leading recruiters of H-1B visa workers in recent years, reshaping the landscape of foreign talent employment in the United States.

From May 2020 to May 2024, significant players such as Citigroup, AT&T, and Capital One have emerged as top recruiters of foreign labor through staffing and outsourcing agencies, according to data analyzed by Bloomberg. This trend marks a notable shift from previous years, where technology firms in Silicon Valley dominated H-1B visa hiring.

The H-1B visa is crucial for U.S. companies requiring individuals for specialty occupations demanding theoretical or technical expertise. Fields actively engaging H-1B workers include information technology, engineering, finance, and healthcare.

Applicants must possess a job offer from a U.S. employer and hold at least a bachelor’s degree or its equivalent in their field to qualify for the visa. The initial grant is for up to three years and can be extended to a maximum of six. Each fiscal year, the U.S. government issues 65,000 H-1B visas with an additional 20,000 allotted to applicants with a U.S. master’s degree or higher.

The perpetual high demand for these visas has necessitated a lottery system. Employers are required to submit a Labor Condition Application to ensure fair wages and working conditions for their H-1B employees. This program remains critical for enabling U.S. businesses to leverage global talent and address skill shortages.

India has consistently emerged as a leading source of H-1B applicants. The country accounts for roughly 70–75% of all petitions due to its robust tech industry and close ties with U.S. technology firms. China follows as the second-largest contributor, contributing about 11–13% of applications. Other countries like Canada, South Korea, and the Philippines each represent under 1% of the total.

The global workforce distribution, particularly in IT, engineering, and healthcare, highlights how U.S. companies rely heavily on skilled professionals from these countries to meet their labor demands.

Bloomberg’s report reveals that Citigroup Inc. added over 3,000 new H-1B workers during this four-year span—surpassing prominent tech companies like Nvidia, Oracle, and Qualcomm. However, most of these hires are not direct employees but rather contractors through third-party firms. A significant portion came via outsourcing companies like Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (TCS), which is currently under investigation by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for possible discrimination against non-Indian workers.

In response to these allegations, a spokesperson for TCS stated, “Allegations that TCS engages in unlawful discrimination are meritless and misleading. TCS has a strong track record of being an equal opportunity employer in the US, embracing the highest levels of integrity and values in our operations.”

Citigroup also addressed questions about their hiring approach, saying, “We supplement our 71,000 US workers with highly skilled H-1B visa holders to address specific, timely needs. When we do so, we follow relevant laws and regulations, including anti-discrimination laws.”

Bloomberg’s analysis suggests that H-1B contractors receive significantly lower compensation than their direct counterparts. While software developers through staffing agencies reported median earnings of $94,000, those directly employed earned $142,000, even while factoring in job title, education, and experience.

The disparity in wages has drawn criticism concerning the program’s aim to recruit the highest caliber of professionals. “If the whole purpose of this program is to hire the best of the best, then why aren’t we seeing higher wages?” remarked Susan Houseman of the W.E. Upjohn Institute, after examining the findings.

Despite this critique, proponents of the H-1B program argue it addresses critical skill shortages in the U.S. workforce by bringing in unique expertise that complements the existing labor pool and maintains company competitiveness globally. They further assert that there are built-in protections to guard against wage abuse, though acknowledging that enforcement poses challenges.

The redirection of H-1B workers from tech to telecom and banking indicates that skilled foreign professionals are increasingly finding career opportunities outside of traditional technology firms.

According to Bloomberg.

Source: Original article

SIM Cards Replaced by New Mobile Technology System

The telecommunications industry in Spain is on the cusp of a significant shift as it moves towards adopting eSIM technology, marking the beginning of the end for traditional SIM cards.

The telecommunications landscape is undergoing rapid evolution, and Spain is poised to bid farewell to the SIM cards that have powered mobile devices since their inception. The future of mobile connectivity lies in the technological innovation that eSIM brings. Historically, mobile phones have relied on a physical card as an essential component of the GSM network. Nonetheless, telecom companies in Spain are now facilitating the transition from conventional SIM cards to the new eSIM technology.

The SIM card, standing for Subscriber Identity Module, is a physical card that contains identification data utilized in mobile phones. Introduced in July 1991, it became a necessary element of the GSM network, ensuring that a phone could connect to a teleoperator network, and helping to identify the user’s phone line and contractual details. While phone numbers still function as the main identification linked to contracts, the once mandatory method of network operation is nearing obsolescence.

The advent of eSIM technology represents a paradigm shift from traditional physical SIM cards to digital versions. Without the need for a physical card, eSIM can be activated remotely via a QR code or operator application, offering several advantages:

Firstly, eSIMs can store multiple profiles from different operators on a single device, allowing users to effortlessly switch between lines or data plans. This is particularly advantageous for travelers, as it enables them to activate local data plans without swapping out cards. Additionally, eSIMs enhance security by eliminating the risk of theft or loss associated with physical SIMs. They are also compatible with nearly all devices currently available in the market.

Activating an eSIM is often straightforward and cost-free for consumers. Customers typically initiate the process through their operator’s app, by phone, or at physical stores. Despite this, some services, such as MultiSIM, which allows a main line to be used across multiple devices simultaneously, incur an additional charge. In Spain, companies like Movistar offer eSIM activation for free, while others, such as Orange or Vodafone, charge between €5 and €10.

eSIM technology offers significant benefits not only to consumers but also to businesses. The ability to connect multiple devices with a single line could streamline operations substantially for telecommunications firms. Moreover, the capability to maintain different numbers across countries presents a competitive edge, particularly for frequent travelers. The physical removal of the SIM card translates to cost reductions as well.

Currently, eSIM activation is available to any customer across carriers, with the caveat that the device in use must support it. While physical SIM cards remain in use, their popularity is waning as digital alternatives garner favor. In the greater context of technological advancement and connectivity, eSIMs are paving the way for more accessible, efficient, and global communication.

Source: Original article

Texas Floods Kill Dozens; 21 Children Among Victims

Flash floods in Texas have resulted in the deaths of at least 68 people across five counties, and officials warn the toll may continue to rise.

The devastating flash floods sweeping through Texas have claimed the lives of at least 68 people, with the possibility of more casualties as rescue operations continue. Five counties across the state have been severely impacted.

Kerr County has reported the highest number of fatalities with 59 confirmed deaths. According to Sheriff Larry Leitha, among the deceased are 38 adults and 21 children, illustrating the wide-reaching impact of the natural disaster.

In Travis County, local authorities confirmed four deaths. County Judge Andy Brown shared this update as emergency services continue their efforts to locate and assist those still unaccounted for.

Burnet County also experienced tragic losses, with two people confirmed dead. This information was verified by the county’s emergency management coordinator.

Similarly, Kendall County officials reported two fatalities. The county’s local officials issued a statement confirming these deaths while highlighting ongoing search and rescue operations.

Elsewhere, Tom Green County has reported one death, which was confirmed by the San Angelo Police Department. These figures contribute to the overall death toll as communities grapple with the aftermath of the floods.

The situation remains dynamic as rescue crews work tirelessly to find the missing and support affected residents throughout Texas. Officials warn that as rescue teams reach more remote areas, the death toll is likely to rise further.

This report is based on updates provided by regional authorities, highlighting the collaborative efforts in managing the crisis, according to BBC News.

Source: Original article

Catholic Church Opposes MAGA-Backed Bill, Calls It a Moral Failure

The proposed legislation allocates billions toward aggressive immigration enforcement and cuts vital health and food assistance programs, drawing widespread condemnation from faith leaders across the United States.

A controversial legislative proposal is drawing significant criticism from religious leaders nationwide due to its heavy investment in aggressive immigration enforcement and proposed cuts to healthcare and food assistance. Faith leaders are voicing concerns over the ethical implications and potential social consequences of such a move.

The bill primarily focuses on allocating over $150 billion towards enforcing border policies and bolstering immigration crackdowns. This includes a dramatic increase in the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention budget, set to grow from $3.4 billion to $45 billion by 2029. Professor Donald Moynihan of the University of Michigan highlighted that the ICE budget would surpass the combined funding for all 50 federal prisons.

Critics argue that this immense funding could create a self-perpetuating deportation infrastructure, drawing parallels to the private prison system and military complex. As with military spending, increased funding could incentivize further crackdowns and family separations, leading to a cycle of enforcement.

The legislation also targets faith communities by removing places of worship from the Department of Homeland Security’s sensitive locations list, making it easier for ICE agents to conduct enforcement actions there. Consequently, many religious communities have reported declines in attendance, as the threat of enforcement deters families from practicing their faith.

Prominent Catholics, including Cardinal Robert McElroy and Bishop Jaime Soto, alongside leaders from Episcopalian, Jewish, Lutheran, Presbyterian, and Muslim communities, have signed a letter opposing the bill. They argue that the legislation’s focus on a border wall could drive migrants into remote regions, increasing the risk of deaths, harming the local environment, and forcing asylum-seekers to rely on human smugglers.

Religious leaders advocate for creating legal migration avenues and a legalization program for immigrants who have long contributed to the U.S. economy. They assert these alternatives would better serve immigrants and the nation than a mass deportation campaign.

The bill also proposes severe cuts to healthcare and food assistance, including slashing nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid. This reduction could jeopardize countless lives, leading to increased poverty, bankruptcies, and closures of vital healthcare facilities. Additionally, the bill aims to cut approximately $186 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by 2034, raising concerns about food insecurity for millions.

According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the legislation would exacerbate income inequality by transferring wealth from the nation’s poorest citizens to the wealthiest. This aspect particularly troubles faith leaders, who emphasize the moral obligation to support the most vulnerable.

Archbishop Timothy P. Broglio, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, criticized the bill for offering tax breaks to some while undermining social safety nets through significant cuts to nutrition assistance and Medicaid. He noted the bill’s failure to protect families and children by exclusively focusing on enforcement rather than preserving access to legal protections.

Faith leaders argue the bill’s approach is a moral failure, urging lawmakers to find a better path forward. They call on senators to reconsider the provisions, emphasizing the need to protect human dignity and uphold the common good.

Study Links Coffee Drinking Habits to Longevity

Drinking coffee black or with minimal sweeteners may contribute to a longer lifespan, according to a recent study.

Does your morning coffee come with cream and sugar, or do you prefer it black? A new study suggests that your choice could have implications for your longevity. According to research led by Tufts University, taking your coffee black or with minimal additives may be linked to a longer life.

The study found that coffee drinkers generally tend to outlive non-coffee drinkers, but this potential benefit is most pronounced when the coffee is consumed black or with minimal sugar and saturated fats. If you prefer your coffee with significant amounts of sugar or full-cream milk, the benefits might be negated.

Bingjie Zhou, an epidemiologist from Tufts University, explained that this research breaks new ground by focusing specifically on the impact of additives on the relationship between coffee consumption and mortality risk. “Few studies have examined how coffee additives could impact the link between coffee consumption and mortality risk, and our study is among the first to quantify how much sweetener and saturated fat are being added,” Zhou said.

The findings are consistent with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which recommend limiting added sugar and saturated fat. Over the course of 9 to 11 years, data was collected from 46,332 U.S. adults aged 20 or older, documented during government health surveys. During that time, 7,074 participants died, and these statistics were then analyzed in conjunction with their coffee consumption habits.

The research identified that coffee consumers had a noticeably lower risk of dying from any cause compared to non-drinkers. However, this statistic held true primarily for those who consumed little to no sugar and saturated fat with their coffee. Specifically, drinking black coffee or coffee with very low sugar and fat content could reduce the risk of earlier death by 14% compared to individuals who abstained from coffee altogether.

Ideally, consuming between two to three cups of coffee per day is suggested for these health benefits. While researchers accounted for various factors that could influence mortality rates, such as exercise habits, alcohol consumption, age, gender, and education level, the study does not establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

There might still be undiscovered variables that affect both coffee consumption and overall mortality, yet the study provides strong evidence and aligns with previous research on the health benefits of coffee. While the caffeine content in coffee plays a role in its health benefits, the study suggests that the addition of sugar and saturated fat could weaken these positive effects. Notably, decaffeinated coffee drinkers did not experience the same reduction in mortality risk.

“The health benefits of coffee might be attributable to its bioactive compounds, but our results suggest that the addition of sugar and saturated fat may reduce the mortality benefits,” noted Fang Fang Zhang from Tufts University.

Wimbledon Eliminates Line Judges After 148 Years

The All England Lawn Tennis Club has decided to replace human line judges with an electronic calling system at Wimbledon, ending a long-standing tradition.

The historic lawns of Wimbledon have witnessed a significant transition as organizers adopt an electronic calling system, phasing out the use of human line judges. The change marks a poignant shift for the tournament, which has been synonymous with the presence of these officials clad in distinctive Ralph Lauren uniforms.

Pauline Eyre, a former line judge at Wimbledon, nostalgically recalls stepping onto the grass courts for the first time at age 21, not as a player, but as an official. Despite describing herself as a “pretty bad junior player” who never advanced far in local tournaments, Eyre achieved her career’s peak as a line judge at Wimbledon. However, this chapter closes as technology steps in to take over these duties.

“At the end of the day, a tennis match is sport, and sport is about people,” Eyre told CNN Sports. “And I don’t think technology necessarily makes everything better. I don’t think it’s improving the quality of the line calling because line calling was always excellent.”

The shift toward electronic line calling (ELC) aligns Wimbledon with other major tennis events. While the ATP and WTA Tours, along with the Australian and US Opens, have embraced this technology, Roland-Garros remains the lone grand slam using human officials for calls. The decision at Wimbledon has stirred mixed reactions, highlighting the balance between tradition and technological progression.

The All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) chief executive, Sally Bolton, noted that the change is designed to provide “maximum accuracy in our officiating” and ensure players experience “the same conditions” as in most other events. Andrew Jarrett, Wimbledon’s tournament referee between 2006 and 2019, argued that the adoption of electronic systems is “almost certainly correct,” citing improved accuracy over human eyesight.

Despite its advantages, Eyre and other purists grieve the disappearing role of line judges. “You have to be a bit of a saint to want to spend your weekends umpiring children’s tennis matches without the carrot of Wimbledon at the end of it,” she remarked, highlighting the reduced incentive for aspiring officials.

Players’ opinions on the shift vary. Women’s top seed Aryna Sabalenka expressed a slight preference for electronic systems due to their clarity, while defending women’s champion Barbora Krejčíková and American star Frances Tiafoe prefer the traditional method that allowed for line call challenges.

The transition to technology is not without hiccups. An automated “out” call during a recent match caused confusion and laughter among spectators, demonstrating some imperfections in the new system. Similarly, concerns about the volume of electronic calls have been raised, with some players claiming they are not always audible, unlike the clear shouts from human judges.

Despite these challenges, Wimbledon’s move away from human line judges signifies a broader trend within tennis, emphasizing technological accuracy over tradition. Yet, many, including Eyre, remember line judging with fondness.

“We just wanted to be part of something we loved,” said Eyre. As she transitions from line judging to stand-up comedy, she reflects on the unique aspects of her former role that made it so special and, perhaps, now missed.

The storied charm of Wimbledon’s human line judges is likely to be remembered with nostalgia—an emblem of the tournament’s rich history now absorbed into the annals of sporting evolution.

Line judges at Wimbledon, once thought of as merely functional, now hold a place in tennis history cherished by traditionalists who keenly feel their absence.

 

Dr. Amit Chakrabarty & Dr. Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI

6 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPIFor the first time in the history of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI), during a formal ceremony Dr. Amit Chakrabarty and Dr. Hetal Gor were formally administered the oath of office as  the President & Chairperson of the Board of Trustees of AAPI, respectively at a solemn ceremony at the AAPI office in Oak Brook, IL, on July 3rd, 2025.

Dr. Suresh Reddy, a past President of AAPI and an elected Trustee of the Oak Brook Township administered the oath of Office to the incoming leaders of AAPI, who are committed to take AAPI to the next level in the coming year.

According to Dr. Satheesh Kathula, current President of AAPI, “In accordance with AAPI Bylaws, the President-Elect and Chair-Elect of the Board of Trustees officially assumed office on July 3rd. While the ceremonial Gavel Transfer will be held during the Annual Convention Gala on Saturday, July 26, 2025, the formal Presidential & BOT Chair Handover Ceremony was held on Thursday, July 3, 2025. This ceremony marks a meaningful leadership transition for our organization.”

Dr Amit Chakrabarty Oath

2 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI“We have the potential to make a significant impact on the healthcare landscape of this country,” Dr. Chakrabarty said. “My goal this year is to unify AAPI by transcending the regional divides that have hindered our progress in recent years. Indian American physicians represent tremendous talent and potential, and the key to realizing that lies in collective action and a united voice—something I am committed to fostering.”

Dr. Hetal Gor, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist, assumed charge as the Chair, Board of Trustees of AAPI. Dr Gor is the president/Founder of Bergen Indian Medical Association , President /Founder of US chapter of FOGSI (Federation of OBGYN Society of India, and had served as the past President of the American Association of OBGYN of Indian Origin. Dr Gor is the Chair of North NJ chapter of Indian American Women Entrepreneurs Association. Dr Gor is a Board of Trustees of Bergen Performing Arts Center in Englewood, NJ, where she brings Indian art and artists to showcase Indian Heritage.

Dr. Meher Medavaram, a Board Certified in Family Medicine Physician and a Fellow of Academy of American Family3 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI Physician, serving as the Medical Director of Mount Sinai Hospital, FAQH Center, and a Staff Physician Advocate at Good Samaritan  Hospital as well as a Clinical Preceptor at UIC College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine CMU School of Medicine also was administered the oath of office as the President Elect of AAPI.

The growing influence of physicians of Indian heritage is evident, as increasingly physicians of Indian origin hold critical positions in healthcare, academic, research, and administrative positions across the nation. We the physicians of Indian origin are proud of our great achievements and contributions to our motherland, India, our adopted land, the US, and in a very significant way to the transformation of Indo-US relations.

4 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPIServing 1 in every 7 patients in the US, AAPI members care for millions of patients every day, while several of them have risen to hold high-flying jobs, shaping the policies and programs, and inventions that shape the landscape of healthcare in the US and around the world.

“Since its inception in 1982, AAPI has been at the forefront, representing a conglomeration of more than 125,000 practicing physicians in the United States, seeking to be the united voice for the physicians of Indian origin. I trust and believe that the new Team under Dr. Amit Chakrabarty will continue the noble mission and strengthen our efforts to make AAPI reach greater heights,” said Dr. Satheesh Kathula.  For more details about AAPI, please visit: www.appiusa,org

5 Dr Amit Chakrabarty & Dr Hetal Gor Formally Assume Charge as President & BOT Chairperson AAPI

House Approves Trump’s Tax Bill, Marking Second-Term Milestone

House Republicans successfully passed President Donald Trump’s significant tax cuts and spending reduction bill, heralding it as a landmark achievement for his second term, despite fierce opposition from Democrats.

In a closely contested vote, House Republicans pushed through President Donald Trump’s tax cuts and spending reductions bill with a slim 218-214 margin. The approval came just in time for the Fourth of July deadline, signaling a high-stakes victory for Trump’s administration as they compile a core policy initiative early in his second term.

The bill, widely seen as a key GOP victory, was finalized amidst controversy and political maneuvering. Two Republican lawmakers joined all Democrats in opposing the legislation. GOP leaders, in collaboration with Trump, worked tirelessly to quell internal dissent and secure the votes necessary for passage.

Celebrating the legislative success in Iowa at the start of events commemorating the nation’s approaching 250th anniversary, Trump expressed gratitude toward Republican lawmakers, disparaging Democrats for their resistance to what he described as a beneficial measure.

House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana echoed Trump’s sentiment, encouraging Republicans to unify behind the bill. The colossal document, nearing 900 pages, encapsulates multiple Republican priorities under one legislative package, now labeled colloquially as Trump’s “one big beautiful bill.”

The enactment preserves $4.5 trillion in tax cuts from 2017 and introduces new ones, favoring provisions such as deductions for workers’ tips and overtime, and a sizeable deduction for older adults with particular income qualifications. Furthermore, it pledges $350 billion towards national security, including advancement in Trump’s deportation policies and the development of a new defensive system, dubbed the “Golden Dome.”

However, to offset substantial tax revenue losses, the bill implements substantial reductions, slashing $1.2 trillion from Medicaid and food stamp funding, with stricter work requirements imposed on beneficiaries. The Congressional Budget Office warns of a $3.3 trillion deficit increase over the next decade, with 11.8 million individuals potentially losing health coverage.

The bill starkly contrasts with Democratic priorities and faced unified Democratic opposition. Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York mounted a record-breaking speech on the House floor, challenging the ramifications of Trump’s “big ugly bill.” His extensive address underscored Democrats’ concerns over social program cutbacks, painting the legislation as detrimental to vulnerable populations.

As Jeffries highlighted the human costs, Democrats collectively denounced the measure as regressive and harmful to working-class citizens. Jeffries’ heartfelt oration warned of life-threatening consequences due to Medicaid cuts and their broader impact on public welfare. Republican counterarguments focused on preventing imminent tax increases while reaffirming beliefs in economic growth and program efficacy through regulatory revisions.

The Senate approved the bill days prior, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. As tensions simmered on the House floor, Johnson and Trump’s team marshaled extensive resources to rally wavering Republicans, balancing concerns between moderates and conservatives within the party.

After the conclusion of the vote, jubilant Republicans celebrated, with Trump loyalists attributing personal political stakes to the passage of the bill. Critics warned that bucking Trump’s agenda could result in significant electoral consequences, illustrating the fierce political entanglements intertwined with the passage of the legislation.

The bill represents a profound challenge to former Democratic administrations’ accomplishments, notably scaling back healthcare expansions from the Affordable Care Act and relaxing green energy incentives earmarked in prior congressional terms. Democrats caution against severe social repercussions, particularly for those reliant on federal assistance programs.

In summary, proponents argue the legislation fosters economic sustainability and secures Trump’s fiscal legacy, while detractors emphasize its expansive social health costs. The ongoing debate underscores entrenched partisan divides, persistent ideological battles, and the complexity of bipartisan governance.

According to Associated Press

Source: Original article

Jaishankar Refutes Trump’s Ceasefire Claims

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar refuted U.S. President Donald Trump’s claims that trade pressure was used to coerce India and Pakistan into agreeing to a ceasefire.

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has provided a firsthand account to counter U.S. President Donald Trump’s assertions regarding a purported use of trade pressure to achieve a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Jaishankar clarified that during crucial communications, no such linkage between trade and ceasefire was made as far as India was concerned.

Speaking in New York, Jaishankar recalled being present on May 9 when U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance spoke to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi via phone. “I can tell you that I was in the room when Vice President Vance spoke to Prime Minister Modi on the night of May 9, saying that the Pakistanis would launch a very massive assault on India,” he stated.

Jaishankar emphasized that India did not capitulate to any pressures and that Prime Minister Modi remained resolute despite threats from Pakistan. “We did not accept certain things,” he explained, “and the Prime Minister was impervious to what the Pakistanis were threatening to do.”

Jaishankar further elaborated that the Indian response was firm and immediate following Pakistan’s aggressive actions. “The Pakistanis did attack us massively that night, (and) we responded very quickly,” he recounted, providing a detailed sequence of events.

The sequence included a subsequent interaction with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, which Jaishankar discussed. “And the next morning, Mr. Rubio called me up and said the Pakistanis were ready to talk,” Jaishankar said, indicating a breakthrough in dialogues without mentioning any trade negotiations.

On the same day, Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations, Major General Kashif Abdullah, directly contacted his Indian counterpart, Lieutenant General Rajiv Ghai, to propose a ceasefire. Jaishankar reaffirmed these details from his personal experience, stressing the absence of trade discussions in these engagements.

Trump reiterated claims of having leveraged trade to mediate a ceasefire during a news conference in The Hague. He stated, “I ended that with a series of phone calls on trade,” alleging that both countries were pushed towards a deal by withholding trade agreements.

Jaishankar, however, contested these assertions, underscoring that trade and diplomacy operated independently. “I think the trade people are doing what the trade people should be doing, which is negotiate with numbers and lines and products and do their tradeoffs,” he said, emphasizing a more structured and professional approach to trade negotiations.

Operation Sindoor was initiated by India targeting terrorist bases in Pakistan as a retaliation for the Pahalgam terrorist attack, which was claimed to be orchestrated by The Resistance Front, a group linked to Pakistan-supported Lashkar-e-Taiba, according to IANS.

Source: Original article

GOP Leaders Work to Unite Party on Trump Megabill

Republican leaders in the House are urgently working to unite their party behind a substantial Senate bill aimed at enacting former President Donald Trump’s domestic agenda before the upcoming holiday weekend.

The effort is proving challenging, as both moderate and conservative Republicans have expressed concerns. Moderates are troubled by the expanded cuts to Medicaid — a change made in the Senate — while conservatives are alarmed by the increased deficit spending also introduced by the Senate. These divisions threaten the bill’s passage, as the GOP holds only a slim majority in the House, necessitating nearly unanimous support from the party.

Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, expressed skepticism about the bill: “If you look at the totality of this, I don’t believe this delivers what the president, what the administration, were working to deliver on,” he said, indicating ongoing efforts to manage deficit spending.

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson of Louisiana and other GOP leaders are racing against time to consolidate support for the bill. The legislation is critical to Trump’s second-term agenda, comprising sweeping tax cuts, a hardline stance on immigration, a shift away from green energy policies, and substantial reductions in federal health and nutrition programs.

House GOP members, from moderates to hard-liners, originally cautioned against a bill changed by the Senate that could be perceived as “worse.” They now face a difficult choice: abandon their initial stance to deliver a victory for Trump, or maintain their position and risk defeating the bill.

Echoing the internal struggle, a moderate House Republican remarked to The Hill, “Maybe I’ll get lucky and have a rough enough landing or something that I’m unable to make [it] to D.C. for a few weeks,” underscoring the challenge of their predicament.

Adding to the pressure, former President Trump is strongly advocating for the bill, warning House Republicans of potential primary challenges if they oppose the legislation he terms the “big, beautiful bill.” This is not an idle threat; Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who opposed the House version, has been targeted by a MAGA-super PAC, and Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina faced backlash from Trump, leading to his announcement of retirement after the current term.

While Democrats cannot block the bill, they are underscoring its most controversial elements, like significant cuts to low-income health and nutrition programs — proposals aimed at funding the Republican tax cuts. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries criticized the bill, saying, “This bill won’t make life more affordable for the American people. It will make life more expensive.”

The timeline for passing the legislation adds another layer of complexity. Johnson and GOP leaders aim to meet a self-imposed deadline of July 4, requiring swift action from lawmakers.

Despite the tight timeline, there is skepticism about meeting this goal. Conservatives and moderates alike have voiced concerns about increased national debt and deficits, complicating efforts to consolidate support. Rep. Marlin Stutzman of Indiana stressed the need to ensure the bill is more fiscally responsible for future generations.

On Tuesday, the House Rules Committee held a meeting as the first step in the legislative process. Subsequent actions include convening the House to debate and vote on procedural rules before deciding on the legislation. However, progress is already facing hurdles; Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland, head of the Freedom Caucus, intends to vote against the procedural rule, jeopardizing the bill’s advancement.

Trump continues to push the bill, praising the Senate’s approval and urging the House to follow suit, highlighting its significance. A senior White House official stressed the urgency of passing the bill in its current form before July 4, dismissing any notion of conferencing the House and Senate versions.

As the deadline looms, the White House is intensifying efforts to rally support, with top officials engaged in outreach to ensure the bill’s passage.

Source: Original article

Powell: Fed Rates Unchanged This Year Due to Tariffs

The Federal Reserve would likely have lowered interest rates this year if not for significant policy changes by President Donald Trump, Chair Jerome Powell stated Tuesday.

In a central banking forum in Sintra, Portugal, Jerome Powell, Chair of the Federal Reserve, indicated that the Fed might have reduced interest rates this year had it not been for the substantial policy shifts implemented by President Donald Trump. When questioned about the possibility of rate cuts, Powell remarked, “I do think that’s right.”

So far this year, the Federal Reserve has refrained from lowering interest rates. Central bankers anticipate that Trump’s tariffs will impact the U.S. economy, prompting them to take a cautious approach, opting to monitor how these changes affect the economic landscape before making any decisions on rate adjustments.

This cautious stance, however, has drawn criticism from President Trump, who has persistently criticized Powell’s decision not to reduce rates. Trump has called Powell derogatory names such as a “numbskull” and a “moron” for maintaining higher interest rates compared to other countries.

In a handwritten note shared on his social media platform on Monday, Trump lambasted Powell, alleging that the Fed’s policies have financially harmed the United States. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that this note was delivered to the Fed on the same day.

The sentiment to cut rates is shared, albeit to a lesser extent, by others within the Fed. Two officials — Michelle Bowman, Fed Vice Chair for Supervision, and Fed Governor Christopher Waller — have opined that a rate cut could be considered as early as July. However, unlike Trump, they have refrained from advocating dramatic cuts, emphasizing that any decision should be contingent on economic conditions, specifically the severity of tariff-induced inflation.

Despite some internal support for rate adjustment, the likelihood of a rate cut in July remains slim, as indicated by futures data which estimate an 81% probability of rates holding steady at the Fed’s July 29-30 meeting, compared to a 19% chance of a quarter-point rate cut.

Powell, during his panel in Sintra, acknowledged that a majority of Fed officials foresee the necessity of reducing rates later this year, depending on inflation trends and labor market developments. He stated, “A solid majority of (Fed officials) do expect that it will become appropriate later this year to begin to reduce rates again.”

When asked about the possibility of a July rate cut, Powell refrained from giving a definitive answer, noting that he “can’t say” but would not dismiss any meeting from consideration.

European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, who was also on the Sintra panel, expressed support for Powell’s data-driven approach to policymaking and commended him for his apolitical stance. She affirmed that Powell “epitomizes the standard of a courageous central banker.”

Powell has refrained from responding to President Trump’s public barbs and reiterated his commitment to his responsibilities, stating, “I’m very focused on just doing my job.” Lagarde, when asked how she would respond to criticisms akin to those from Trump, supported Powell’s stance, suggesting, “I think we would (all) do exactly the same thing as our colleague, Jay Powell, does.”

Following Lagarde’s comment, attendees at the conference offered applause in support. Powell reiterated the Fed’s mission to maintain macroeconomic stability, emphasizing the need for a non-partisan approach, stating, “We don’t take sides. We don’t play one side against the other. We stay out of issues that are really not our bailiwick.”

Source: Original article

Senate Approves Trump Agenda Bill After Extended Voting Session

The Senate has narrowly passed President Donald Trump’s domestic agenda bill, which now moves to the House of Representatives for further approval.

The Senate passed President Donald Trump’s ambitious legislative package on a knife-edge vote of 50-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the decisive vote. This megabill represents a core component of Trump’s domestic agenda and has set the stage for a significant legislative battle as it heads to the House of Representatives.

Republican leaders in the Senate managed to secure enough votes after intense negotiations with key holdouts in their ranks. However, the next hurdle appears imminent, with GOP leaders in the House now facing a high-stakes effort to ensure the bill reaches the president’s desk by July 4.

While visiting a makeshift detention facility called “Alligator Alcatraz” in Florida, President Trump confidently predicted the bill’s successful passage in the House. He also downplayed concerns related to potential impacts on American health care coverage, which have been a point of contention among critics of the bill.

This extensive bill outlines significant tax reductions and boosts in funding for national security, all of which will be offset by the most considerable cuts to the federal safety net seen in decades. As Washington gears up for another legislative showdown, the focus now turns to the House as lawmakers evaluate the sweeping changes proposed within this multi-trillion-dollar plan.

According to CNN, the bill’s advancement symbolizes a pivotal moment in Trump’s tenure, potentially reshaping the nation’s fiscal landscape if fully enacted.

Source: Original article

Gas Vehicle Surpasses EV Leader as Best-Selling Car Worldwide

The Toyota RAV4 reclaimed its position as the world’s best-selling car in 2024, narrowly surpassing the Tesla Model Y.

In a continually evolving global car market, Toyota has managed to reassert its dominance. The Toyota RAV4 has reclaimed its position as the world’s best-selling vehicle, edging ahead of the Tesla Model Y. With this achievement, Toyota has demonstrated its resilient market strategy and extensive appeal, especially notable in a market increasingly shifting toward electric vehicles.

Toyota’s triumph is not limited to just the RAV4. The company placed five models in the global top ten, reflecting its broad appeal across multiple vehicle categories. Joining the RAV4 are the Corolla Cross, Corolla sedan, Hilux, and Camry, highlighting Toyota’s comprehensive market reach.

This 2024 ranking originates from industry analyst Felipe Munoz, who utilized a wide array of sources for his analysis. His robust methodology combines data from national statistics offices, dealership associations, customs records, specialized websites, industry blogs, and other analysts’ informed estimates. Munoz’s study encompasses 153 markets, accounting for approximately 99% of global car sales, providing an in-depth look into the automotive industry’s current landscape.

The numbers illustrate Toyota’s narrow victory with combined sales of the RAV4 and its China-market variant, the Wildlander, reaching 1,187,000 units. This slightly surpassed the Tesla Model Y’s sales figure of 1,185,000 units, marking a narrow yet significant win.

It’s notable that both models received updates shortly after the reporting period. Toyota’s RAV4 underwent a complete redesign, yet to hit the market, while Tesla has already released its refreshed Model Y, known as Juniper. Despite these updates, the Model Y retains its status as the best-selling electric vehicle, although 2025 figures suggest a potential slowdown.

The compact crossover segment continues to drive significant sales, as evidenced by the Toyota Corolla Cross, which secured third place in the rankings with 859,000 units sold. Its widespread availability across various markets contributes largely to its success. Trailing closely is the Honda CR-V/Breeze SUV, which achieved sales of 854,000 units.

Toyota’s stronghold is further solidified by the Corolla sedan with 697,000 units sold, landing it in fifth place, and the Hilux pickup with 617,000 units, in sixth place globally. Despite its aging model, the Hilux stands out as the world’s best-selling pickup, even as it is absent from North American and Chinese markets, two of the largest for trucks. In contrast, the Ford F-150 sold 595,000 units, securing the seventh position overall and placing second in U.S. vehicle sales, shadowed only by the RAV4.

Closing the top ten are sedans maintaining their relevance amidst the rising tide of crossovers and SUVs. The Toyota Camry achieved eighth place with 593,000 sales, followed by the Tesla Model 3 at 560,000, and the BYD Qin, the sole Chinese brand to make this year’s list, at 502,000. The inclusion of BYD underscores its growing influence as a competitor in both the EV and traditional combustion markets.

These figures depict a global automotive landscape where traditional manufacturers like Toyota retain significant influence while newer players like Tesla and BYD carve out substantial market niches. As the industry continues to evolve, particularly toward electrification, these dynamics will likely shift, presenting both challenges and opportunities for manufacturers worldwide.

According to Carscoops, these developments reflect the ongoing transformations within the car industry as manufacturers strive to meet changing consumer expectations and regulatory landscapes.

Source: Original article

Justice Department to Focus on Revoking Naturalized Citizenship

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is intensifying efforts to revoke the citizenship of naturalized Americans who have committed crimes, aligning with the Trump administration’s broader immigration policies.

The recent initiative by the DOJ emphasizes denaturalization, focusing on individuals involved in activities categorized under “war crimes,” “extrajudicial killings,” “human rights abuses,” and those posing ongoing threats, including terrorism. The directive is part of a memo, urging the DOJ’s Civil Division to prioritize these cases to the full extent permitted by law and supported by evidence.

This development marks a significant escalation in the Trump administration’s immigration agenda, which seeks to target not just undocumented immigrants but also lawful permanent residents and naturalized citizens.

Naturalization is the process by which U.S. citizenship is granted to a lawful permanent resident, following criteria set by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), there were 24.5 million naturalized citizens in the U.S. in 2022, accounting for 53% of the immigrant population, based on data analyzed by the Migration Policy Institute.

The path to naturalization is rigorous, requiring individuals to be lawful permanent residents for a minimum of five years—exceptions are made for spouses of U.S. citizens and U.S. military members—and to possess proficiency in English as well as an understanding of U.S. history and government.

The shift towards increased denaturalization began under the Obama administration, as noted by Cassandra Burke Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University. The rise was due in part to improved digital tools for identifying cases of naturalization fraud. The trend has accelerated under the Trump administration, which has been actively pursuing denaturalization at unprecedented levels.

Statistics from the DOJ indicate at least 305 denaturalization cases were filed between 1990 and 2017, with the number surging during Trump’s first term. From January 2017 to August 2018, USCIS reviewed approximately 2,500 cases for possible denaturalization, referring over 110 cases to the DOJ for prosecution.

The recent memo from Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate includes denaturalization among the top five priorities for the DOJ’s Civil Division. Denaturalization is pursued in instances where individuals have allegedly obtained citizenship fraudulently by concealment of material facts or willful misrepresentation.

Concerns over the constitutional aspects of these efforts have been voiced, with Robertson arguing that civil litigation to strip citizenship may violate due process under the 14th Amendment. The DOJ’s approach allows for the potential use of denaturalization as a tool against free speech, targeting individuals and institutions for allegations ranging from antisemitism to criticism of U.S. foreign policy.

The DOJ has already denaturalized individuals in cases involving serious criminal convictions. One case involved the revocation of citizenship from a person convicted of collecting and distributing child sexual abuse material.

This DOJ initiative reflects a broader strategy by the Trump administration to leverage immigration policy as a means to address national security and public safety concerns, often amidst debate over the balance between enforcement and civil liberties.

Source: Original article

Justice Department Intensifies Denaturalization Drive, Raising Constitutional Concerns

The Justice Department is increasingly focusing on stripping U.S. citizenship from certain naturalized Americans. According to a memo dated June 11, DOJ leadership is instructing attorneys to prioritize denaturalization in cases involving naturalized citizens who have committed specific crimes. The directive also grants U.S. attorneys more authority in deciding when to pursue such actions. This policy shift targets individuals not born in the United States, and as of 2023, nearly 25 million immigrants had obtained U.S. citizenship through naturalization.

The new emphasis on denaturalization has already produced results. On June 13, a judge revoked the citizenship of Elliott Duke, an American military veteran originally from the United Kingdom who uses they/them pronouns. Duke had been convicted of distributing child sexual abuse material, a crime they later admitted to committing even before becoming a U.S. citizen.

Historically, denaturalization was a prominent tool during the McCarthy era in the late 1940s and early 1950s. It was further utilized during the Obama administration and expanded under President Trump’s first term. The process has typically targeted individuals who concealed past crimes or affiliations with banned organizations—such as the Nazi Party or communist groups—on their citizenship applications.

In his memo, Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate emphasized the importance of this effort: “The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.”

This renewed focus aligns with the Trump administration’s broader effort to reshape the U.S. immigration system. President Trump has made immigration policy a central issue in his governance, seeking to end birthright citizenship and reduce refugee admissions. These moves reflect a fundamental redefinition of who is entitled to American citizenship.

However, constitutional scholars and immigration experts have expressed significant alarm about this denaturalization push. Cassandra Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, noted that the DOJ’s reliance on civil litigation for denaturalization raises serious concerns. In civil court, those targeted do not have the right to government-appointed attorneys, the standard of proof is lower, and cases can be resolved more quickly.

Robertson warned, “Stripping Americans of citizenship through civil litigation violates due process and infringes on the rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.”

Still, the move has supporters. Hans von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation endorsed the initiative, stating, “I do not understand how anyone could possibly be opposed to the Justice Department taking such action to protect the nation from obvious predators, criminals, and terrorists.” Regarding concerns over legal representation, he added, “Nothing prevents that alien from hiring their own lawyer to represent them. They are not entitled to have the government — and thus the American taxpayer — pay for their lawyer.”

He further argued, “That is not a ‘due process’ violation since all immigration proceedings are civil matters and no individuals — including American citizens — are entitled to government-furnished lawyers in any type of civil matter.”

Neither the DOJ nor the Trump White House commented on the matter.

The June 11 memo significantly broadens the categories of offenses that could trigger denaturalization. These include crimes related to national security and fraud against individuals or the government, such as Paycheck Protection Program loan fraud or Medicaid and Medicare fraud.

Sameera Hafiz, policy director at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, described the administration’s new approach as “very shocking and very concerning.” She stated, “It is kind of, in a way, trying to create a second class of U.S. citizens,” implying that naturalized citizens remain vulnerable to losing their status despite having followed legal processes.

Adding to these concerns, the memo grants federal attorneys the discretion to pursue denaturalization cases beyond the listed categories. “These categories do not limit the Civil Division from pursuing any particular case,” the memo reads, further noting that priorities may include “any other cases referred to the Civil Division that the Division determines to be sufficiently important to pursue.”

Steve Lubet, professor emeritus at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law, found this language troubling. “Many of the categories are so vague as to be meaningless. It isn’t even clear that they relate to fraudulent procurement, as opposed to post-naturalization conduct,” he observed.

Von Spakovsky countered that the government is right to be uncompromising. “When we extend the opportunity for naturalization to aliens, we are granting them a great privilege — the privilege of becoming a U.S. citizen,” he said. “Anyone who has abused the privilege of the opportunity of becoming a U.S. citizen should have that citizenship revoked when they engage in such reprehensible behavior.”

Lubet also pointed out the broader implications for families, particularly children who derived citizenship through a naturalized parent. “People who thought they were safely American and had done nothing wrong can suddenly be at risk of losing citizenship,” he said.

The DOJ did not address questions about how children of denaturalized parents would be affected or what would happen if individuals were rendered stateless.

The case of Elliott Duke appears to be an early example of how the new denaturalization efforts might play out. Duke, who became a U.S. citizen in January 2013, was found to have started distributing child sexual abuse material while serving in Germany in 2012. Duke relinquished their U.K. citizenship to become an American. The DOJ filed the case in February in Louisiana, citing both the prior conviction and Duke’s failure to disclose criminal activity during the naturalization process.

During the legal proceedings, Duke struggled to secure representation and could not attend court in Louisiana. “My heart shattered when I read the lines [of the order]. My world broke apart,” Duke said.

Shumate, in a statement, warned, “If you commit serious crimes before you become a U.S. citizen and then lie about them during your naturalization process, the Justice Department will discover the truth and come after you.”

Laura Bingham, executive director of the Temple University Institute for Law Innovation and Technology, cautioned that the Duke case sets a worrying precedent. “Citizenship is not supposed to be something that you can continuously open up for some people, and you can’t for others,” she said.

Historically, denaturalization surged during the McCarthy era, with over 22,000 cases filed annually. “At the height of denaturalization, there were about 22,000 cases a year… It was huge,” Robertson recalled. However, a 1967 Supreme Court ruling curtailed the practice, citing its incompatibility with democratic values.

From that point until the Obama era, denaturalization became rare. The Obama administration revived it with initiatives like Operation Janus, which sought out potential naturalization fraud, especially linked to national security concerns.

Trump’s first term saw further expansion, with a preference for pursuing denaturalization through civil rather than criminal courts. Although Robertson questions how many cases will meet the criteria outlined in the recent memo, she fears the aggressive push may target individuals with minimal infractions. “It fits in with the other ways that we’ve seen immigration enforcement happening,” she said.

This recent policy shift marks a significant chapter in U.S. immigration enforcement, raising crucial questions about due process, equal protection, and the long-term security of naturalized citizenship.

US Embassy in India Emphasizes Strict Visa Screening and Social Media Disclosure as National Security Measure

The United States Embassy in India has reiterated the stringent vetting procedures tied to its visa policies, describing each visa adjudication as a matter of national security. In a statement posted on the social media platform X, the embassy highlighted the requirement for all applicants to provide complete details of their social media presence over the last five years while applying for nonimmigrant visas.

“Visa applicants are required to list all social media usernames or handles of every platform they have used from the last 5 years on the DS-160 visa application form. Applicants certify that the information in their visa application is true and correct before they sign and submit,” stated the US Embassy in a recent post.

This disclosure requirement, according to the embassy, is an integral part of the broader national security screening process employed by the United States. Failing to comply with this requirement could have serious consequences. “Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas,” the post further warned.

This advisory is part of a broader campaign by the embassy to inform and caution visa applicants about the importance of accuracy and transparency in their applications. The embassy’s post included digital posters reiterating the security aspect of the visa process. One poster read, “Every U.S. visa adjudication is a national security decision,” and emphasized, “The United States requires visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on visa application forms. We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting.”

In a related update earlier this month, the embassy had urged applicants falling under F, M, or J non-immigrant visa categories to make their social media accounts public. This recommendation was made to aid US authorities in verifying applicants’ identities and establishing their admissibility under American law. These visa categories include F and M for students and J for exchange visitors.

The embassy elaborated that since 2019, the United States has mandated the disclosure of “social media identifiers” as part of both immigrant and non-immigrant visa applications. This long-standing requirement, according to the embassy, is vital to national security and helps immigration authorities thoroughly vet each applicant.

The embassy’s statements come amid a wider crackdown on immigration in the United States. Recently, the Trump administration intensified enforcement actions in Los Angeles, targeting immigration violations more aggressively. In light of this, the US Embassy in India has stepped up its communication, providing frequent updates on policy and legal expectations for visa applicants.

On June 24, the embassy issued another warning, stating that immigration law enforcement had been stepped up across the country. The message was unambiguous—those found violating immigration laws would face strict penalties, including detention, deportation, and permanent ineligibility for future visas.

Adding to this, the embassy’s statement noted, “The US had increased enforcement of immigration laws, and violators would face detention, deportation and permanent consequences for future visa eligibility.” The warning was not limited to overstays or misrepresentation; it also made it clear that illegal entry into the United States would result in jail time and removal from the country.

This was not the only caution issued during the month. On June 19, the embassy released another strongly worded statement reminding applicants that obtaining a US visa is not a guaranteed right but a discretionary privilege. It emphasized that screening and scrutiny continue even after a visa is issued. Authorities in the US reserve the right to revoke a visa if the holder is found in violation of any laws.

The embassy said, “A US visa was a privilege, not a right,” underscoring that post-issuance reviews are routine and can result in visa cancellation if necessary. It further added that involvement in illegal activities, including drug use or breaking US laws while in the country on a student or visitor visa, could severely impact one’s ability to receive future visas.

This line of messaging from the US Embassy in India has been consistent throughout the month. The campaign has included reminders that although the US continues to welcome legal travelers, any attempt to enter the country illegally or abuse the visa system will not be tolerated.

Reiterating this stance, the embassy made a significant statement on June 16, asserting that the United States “will not tolerate those who facilitate illegal and mass immigration to the US.” This message also revealed a policy shift: the US had introduced “new visa restrictions” aimed specifically at foreign government officials and individuals who violate immigration laws.

This multi-pronged approach by the US government reflects a broader tightening of immigration and visa processes, especially in the wake of mounting concerns around illegal immigration. With policies targeting both individual applicants and those facilitating unlawful entry, the US is sending a clear signal about the importance of legal compliance.

By highlighting these issues through multiple channels and on various dates, the US Embassy in India is working to ensure that prospective travelers are well aware of the rules and expectations. The detailed advisories, warnings about visa ineligibility, and emphasis on national security collectively serve to underline the gravity with which the US government views visa applications.

These measures not only aim to safeguard national interests but also serve as a deterrent for those considering bypassing legal immigration processes. By requiring disclosure of social media identifiers, encouraging transparency, and increasing legal enforcement, the United States is fortifying its immigration system against potential risks.

At the same time, the US government continues to stress that it welcomes legal immigration and supports those who abide by the rules. But any deviation from lawful practices will result in serious and lasting consequences.

The embassy’s message, repeated throughout June, is unambiguous: compliance with visa rules, honesty in the application process, and adherence to US laws are non-negotiable. The US authorities are equipped to detect discrepancies and enforce immigration laws without hesitation.

From urging public visibility of social media accounts to warning against drug use and law violations, the embassy has rolled out a series of reminders to leave no room for misunderstanding. These reminders serve both as guidance for sincere applicants and a deterrent for those contemplating any kind of misuse of the system.

Ultimately, the consistent tone and content of the embassy’s advisories reflect a strategic policy direction that prioritizes national security while maintaining opportunities for legal entry. Through transparency, accountability, and firm enforcement, the United States aims to maintain the integrity of its immigration system.

Shifting Social Security Rules Push Retirement Age Higher: How Americans Can Strategize Early Retirement Plans

For many years, the age of 65 has represented a symbolic point at which Americans envisioned hanging up their work boots and enjoying retirement. However, due to a series of gradual legislative changes, the Social Security system is moving the goalposts. Starting in 2025, individuals born in 1959 will reach full retirement age (FRA) at 66 years and 10 months. For everyone born in 1960 or later, the FRA will be a full 67 years. While this shift might appear minor, its financial effects are far from negligible, particularly for those considering retiring early.

These changes reflect long-term policy decisions intended to keep the Social Security system financially sustainable. Understanding how the adjustments impact benefits and creating a financial plan tailored to these evolving realities is crucial for ensuring a comfortable retirement.

Understanding the Adjustment to Full Retirement Age

The phased increase in the full retirement age can be traced back to the 1983 Social Security Amendments, which were designed to improve the program’s long-term viability. These amendments incrementally raised the FRA from the longstanding age of 65 to 67. The implementation has been gradual, increasing by two months for each birth year.

For example:

  • Those born in 1958 face an FRA of 66 years and 8 months
  • Individuals born in 1959 will reach FRA at 66 years and 10 months
  • Anyone born in 1960 or after will face an FRA of 67

Though people can start claiming Social Security as early as age 62, doing so comes with a permanent reduction in benefits. For those born in 1959, claiming benefits at 62 results in about a 29% decrease in monthly payments. The cut increases to 30% for those born in 1960 or later.

On the other hand, delaying benefits past FRA can result in an 8% annual boost, continuing until age 70. If you wait until then, you can receive up to 32% more each month. These numbers can significantly impact your long-term financial picture.

How to Handle the Income Gap Before Full Benefits

While many workers aim to retire before hitting FRA, doing so without careful planning can harm long-term financial health. Several strategies can help bridge the income gap from early retirement until full Social Security benefits become available.

One practical method is phased retirement. Instead of leaving the workforce entirely, you might negotiate a lighter schedule—working three or four days per week. Even working 15 to 20 hours weekly can help cover essential expenses and slow the depletion of your savings.

Another recommended approach is building a financial buffer. Experts advise saving enough to cover 18 to 24 months of living expenses in a high-yield savings or money market account. This safety net allows you to avoid dipping into long-term investments during volatile market periods.

Unused personal assets can also generate income. For instance, homeowners might consider renting out a spare room, potentially bringing in $700 to $1,000 per month. If you live in an urban area, leasing your driveway for parking could yield $150 to $300 per month.

There’s also the option of taking on a bridge job that offers both pay and benefits. Employers like Costco, Home Depot, and Trader Joe’s often hire part-time workers and provide health coverage for those working 20 to 28 hours weekly. These roles are especially attractive for early retirees looking for flexibility and medical benefits.

Making Withdrawals Work for You

If you retire before age 65 or delay claiming Social Security, your finances will depend heavily on personal savings. Using tax-efficient withdrawal strategies can minimize your tax burden and help your money go further.

One approach is to withdraw from taxable brokerage accounts first. This avoids early withdrawal penalties and allows retirement accounts to continue growing in a tax-advantaged environment.

You can also tap into Roth IRA contributions at any time without penalties or taxes, as long as you only withdraw the contributions and not the earnings. This provides an additional source of tax-free income.

Keeping your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) low is another valuable tactic. A lower MAGI can help you qualify for subsidies under the Affordable Care Act, which can dramatically reduce health insurance costs before you’re eligible for Medicare at age 65.

Generating Side Income Can Help Too

If you’re looking for extra income without the responsibilities of a full-time job, side gigs can offer flexibility and supplemental cash flow. Tutoring, for example, pays between $30 and $50 per hour and can be done on your schedule. Other options include pet sitting, dog walking, or selling crafts through platforms like Etsy.

Prepare for the Possibility of Future Policy Changes

Though the FRA currently caps at 67, ongoing discussions in Washington suggest it could rise further. Some proposals have floated the idea of increasing it to 68 or even 69, citing long-term funding concerns for the Social Security system. While these are not yet law, staying prepared for further changes is wise.

To stay ahead, build a plan that allows for delayed benefits if necessary. Emergency savings and alternative income sources offer greater financial flexibility. Regularly reviewing your retirement income plan will also help you adapt to any policy shifts.

Conclusion: Retirement on Your Own Terms

The gradual rise in Social Security’s full retirement age might seem like a bureaucratic detail, but for millions of Americans, it redefines when and how retirement can happen. Without planning, it can mean smaller monthly checks and more years of work. However, by strategically saving, leveraging assets, working part-time, and utilizing smart withdrawal tactics, you can take control of your financial future.

Retirement shouldn’t be defined by a government schedule. With a solid plan in place, you can retire when you’re ready—on your own terms.

By recognizing the impact of changing policies and preparing accordingly, you give yourself the freedom to shape your own retirement journey.

House Passes Bill to Deport Noncitizens Convicted of Drunk Driving

The U.S. House of Representatives on Friday passed a bill that would mandate the deportation of noncitizens convicted of driving under the influence, according to a report by Breitbart. The legislation, titled the Jeremy and Angel Seay and Sergeant Brandon Mendoza Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act, was put forward by Representative Barry Moore, a Republican from Alabama. The bill is named in remembrance of victims who lost their lives due to accidents caused by intoxicated migrant drivers.

Representative Moore introduced the legislation to honor Jeremy and Angel Seay, a couple from his district, who were tragically killed when a noncitizen driving under the influence struck them while they were riding a motorcycle. Speaking to the Alabama Daily News, Moore said, “Their lives were cut short by the senseless act.” He added, “Tragedies like this are not uncommon across this country,” emphasizing the wider impact of such incidents involving impaired driving by noncitizens.

The bill has ignited a heated debate in Congress, receiving overwhelming support from Republican lawmakers. Most Republicans view the legislation as a necessary measure to safeguard American communities from individuals who repeatedly break laws and endanger lives through reckless behavior such as drunk driving. The bill aims to amend existing immigration policy by making DUI convictions grounds for mandatory deportation.

In contrast, 160 Democrats voted against the bill, raising concerns about the potential for overly broad enforcement and its implications for immigration justice. Opponents argue that while DUI offenses are serious, automatic deportation removes the opportunity for due process or context to be considered, especially for immigrants who may have lived in the U.S. for extended periods or have deep family and community ties.

Despite the partisan split, the legislation’s passage in the House marks a significant step in the ongoing political effort to link public safety and immigration enforcement. The bill now moves to the Senate, where its future remains uncertain, particularly given the different power dynamics and legislative priorities in that chamber.

Representative Moore, in advocating for the legislation, has highlighted personal tragedies such as those experienced by the Seay family to bring attention to what he sees as preventable deaths caused by lax immigration enforcement. By attaching specific names to the bill, including that of Sergeant Brandon Mendoza, a police officer killed in a similar incident, Moore is stressing the real-world consequences of policy gaps. Mendoza’s case, like that of the Seays, has become a symbol in political discussions about the intersection of immigration and criminal law.

“Their lives were cut short by the senseless act,” Moore repeated in statements to the press, underscoring the emotional weight behind the legislation. His remarks reflect a broader Republican viewpoint that public safety should take precedence in immigration decisions, especially when there is a criminal record involved.

The bill’s language stipulates that any noncitizen convicted of driving under the influence would be subject to mandatory removal from the United States. Supporters argue that the measure closes a loophole that allows dangerous individuals to remain in the country despite endangering others through impaired driving. Critics, however, caution that the legislation could lead to disproportionate punishment and may particularly impact certain immigrant communities more heavily than others.

Immigration rights groups and some Democratic lawmakers have expressed concerns that such legislation could further criminalize immigrant populations and erode trust between law enforcement and communities. They argue that while preventing DUI-related deaths is important, a one-size-fits-all deportation policy fails to take into account rehabilitation efforts, family situations, and other mitigating circumstances.

Still, proponents believe the law will serve as a deterrent to noncitizens who might otherwise engage in reckless behavior. By introducing automatic consequences for DUI convictions, supporters contend that the law strengthens both immigration policy and public safety.

The bill’s naming after specific victims adds a human face to what is otherwise a policy discussion, which may help in gaining public support. The use of personal stories has become a common legislative strategy to create empathy and urgency around specific issues, and Moore’s bill is a prominent example.

While the political divide on immigration-related bills continues to grow, this legislation’s focus on DUI offenses could garner some bipartisan interest in the Senate, especially among lawmakers who prioritize public safety. However, it is expected that the bill will face stronger opposition in the Senate, where Democratic control and a more moderate stance on immigration issues could result in amendments or outright rejection.

For now, the bill’s approval in the House reflects a broader Republican push to tighten immigration enforcement and prioritize citizen safety, especially in cases involving criminal behavior. Whether or not this bill becomes law, it has already sparked a national conversation about how the U.S. should handle immigration enforcement in cases involving criminal activity, and how policy can be crafted to prevent further tragedies like those that took the lives of Jeremy and Angel Seay.

With its passage, the House has signaled its stance on the matter, placing the burden of next steps on the Senate. If the bill passes there, it could significantly alter how DUI offenses are treated in the context of immigration law, potentially impacting thousands of noncitizens across the country.

Until then, the debate over balancing compassion in immigration policy with accountability for criminal conduct is likely to continue, both in Congress and among the American public.

Discovery of TOI-1452 b: A Possible Ocean World Just 100 Light-Years from Earth Sparks Scientific Excitement

A remarkable exoplanet located merely 100 light-years away from Earth has caught the attention of the astronomical community. Identified as TOI-1452 b, this celestial body is not just another planet outside our solar system—it might be the first documented “ocean planet.” Scientists believe that up to 30% of this planet could be covered in water. The potential presence of such a large amount of water on a distant planet is stirring conversations about the possibility of life beyond Earth.

What makes this finding even more intriguing is the apparent contradiction between the planet’s physical characteristics and current scientific understanding. TOI-1452 b orbits a star in a zone where prevailing theories in physics and chemistry suggest that liquid water shouldn’t be able to exist. Despite this, all available data points to the possible presence of vast water reserves. As one researcher observed, “The unthinkable seems real: TOI-1452 b challenges everything we thought we knew about exoplanets!”

This potentially groundbreaking discovery has prompted many scientists to label TOI-1452 b as a kind of cosmic cousin to Earth, albeit a more distant and significantly larger one. In terms of physical features, this exoplanet has an ideal combination of properties that set it apart: low density, a balanced temperature based on the energy it receives from its star, and a substantial size.

Initial scientific assessments hint that the planet might be composed of layers of water or ice, possibly resembling the hidden subsurface oceans found on some of our solar system’s moons, such as Ganymede and Enceladus. Located in the Draco constellation, TOI-1452 b is also perfectly positioned for detailed study by the James Webb Space Telescope. The telescope is already being readied to analyze the planet’s atmosphere for any indicators of habitability—or even signs of life.

From a classification standpoint, TOI-1452 b qualifies as a “super-Earth.” Although the term may sound dramatic, it simply refers to a type of rocky planet that is larger than Earth but smaller than the gas giants such as Neptune or Jupiter. With a diameter 70% greater than Earth’s and a mass approximately five times larger, it certainly earns this designation.

What really piqued scientists’ interest was the planet’s density. Based on the numbers, something didn’t quite add up. A planet of that size and mass should be composed primarily of rock or metal, but the relatively low density pointed to another possibility. “Was it a bird? A plane? No! Water!” one scientist quipped, highlighting their conclusion that the most plausible explanation for the low density is a substantial water composition. The presence of such a significant amount of water would also explain how the planet could support potentially habitable conditions, despite its closeness to its host star.

Indeed, TOI-1452 b orbits its star in just 11 Earth days, indicating that it lies very close to the star. Under normal circumstances, a planet in such proximity would be far too hot to support liquid water. However, TOI-1452 b’s host star is not a sun-like star. It is a red dwarf, significantly smaller and cooler than our Sun. This difference may allow the planet to retain moderate temperatures, potentially supporting water in its liquid state. “Isn’t it incredible?” the article exclaims, reflecting widespread astonishment in the scientific community.

To uncover more about this strange world, all eyes are now on the James Webb Space Telescope. The plan is to analyze the exoplanet’s atmosphere as it transits across the face of its star. This method allows researchers to detect specific gases, such as water vapor or hydrogen, in the planet’s atmosphere. Scientists are even optimistic about the possibility of detecting organic molecules—biosignatures that could indicate the presence of life. Are we witnessing the first step toward discovering life beyond Earth?

The label “water world” is not given lightly. While the presence of water on TOI-1452 b has not yet been directly confirmed, the planet exhibits more Earth-like features than any previously discovered exoplanet. That alone makes it a strong candidate for the first confirmed water-covered planet outside our solar system. “We can say that TOI-1452 b is emerging as the planet with the most characteristics similar to Earth,” notes the report.

The broader scientific mission remains focused on understanding how planetary systems form and evolve. However, discoveries like TOI-1452 b inevitably turn the discussion toward the age-old question of life beyond Earth. Based on what is currently known, it’s conceivable that TOI-1452 b could support life in ways similar to Earth. Although, as the article humorously suggests, “maybe they’re not as conflictive as us humans.”

One of the most exciting implications of this discovery is what it suggests about the prevalence of habitable planets in our galaxy. If a planet so close to its star can sustain large quantities of water, perhaps the criteria scientists use to define “habitable zones” have been too narrow. Without a doubt, what stands out most about this discovery is that, if a planet so close to its star can have large amounts of water, we may have underestimated the number of habitable worlds in our galaxy!

In essence, TOI-1452 b may be more than just an exciting discovery. It could mark a turning point in the search for extraterrestrial life, redefining what scientists look for when evaluating whether a planet might support life. As technology advances and more exoplanets like this are observed, the chances of finding a truly Earth-like world—or even alien life—continue to grow.

-+=