Kamala Harris Criticizes Biden for Not Inviting Musk to EV Event

Former Vice President Kamala Harris criticized President Biden for not inviting Elon Musk to a 2021 electric vehicle event, calling it a “big mistake.”

Former Vice President Kamala Harris recently expressed her belief that President Joe Biden made a significant error by not inviting Tesla CEO Elon Musk to a White House event focused on electric vehicles in 2021.

During a discussion at Fortune’s Most Powerful Women Summit in Washington, D.C., Harris reflected on the August 2021 event, which featured executives from General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis, but notably excluded Musk, despite Tesla being the leading electric vehicle manufacturer in the United States.

“I write in the book that I thought it was a big mistake to not invite Elon Musk when we did a big EV event,” Harris stated, referring to her memoir, “107 Days.” In her book, she also critiques Biden for initially running for re-election amid health concerns.

Harris emphasized Musk’s role as a major American innovator in the electric vehicle space, saying, “Here he is, the major American manufacturer of extraordinary innovation in this space.” Musk is also known for his leadership at SpaceX.

The decision to exclude Musk was interpreted by many as an effort to support the United Auto Workers (UAW) and organized labor, given that Tesla’s workforce is not unionized. Harris noted in her memoir that she believed Biden was “sending a message about Musk’s anti-union stance,” but she argued that excluding him as a key player in the industry “simply doesn’t make sense.”

At the time, then-White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki explained that the event featured “the three largest employers of the United Auto Workers,” highlighting the administration’s focus on unionized labor. When questioned about whether Musk’s exclusion was a form of punishment for Tesla’s non-union status, Psaki remarked, “I’ll let you draw your own conclusion.”

The Biden administration defended its decision to invite only certain automakers, describing them as crucial partners in the president’s initiative to promote union jobs.

Harris further asserted that presidents should “put aside political loyalties” when acknowledging technological advancements. She expressed concern that the decision to exclude Musk may have affected his perspective on the administration, saying, “I don’t know Elon Musk, but I have to assume that that was something that hit him hard and had an impact on his perspective.”

Following the event, Musk appeared to express his displeasure over the snub, making several comments on social media. He remarked, “Yeah, seems odd that Tesla wasn’t invited,” and later suggested that the Biden administration seemed “controlled by unions” and was “not the friendliest administration.”

After the news broke that Tesla would not be included, administration officials reportedly extended an apology, according to The Wall Street Journal. Biden aides attempted to mend the relationship, but tensions between Musk and the administration persisted.

Harris’ remarks align with a passage in her memoir where she reiterates that the decision to exclude Tesla was a mistake, suggesting it alienated Musk, who later became a prominent financial supporter of former President Donald Trump.

“Musk never forgave it,” she wrote, noting that he subsequently endorsed Trump in the 2024 election and contributed approximately $300 million to Republican campaign efforts.

Source: Original article

State Department Cautions Hamas Could Breach Ceasefire, Target Civilians

The U.S. State Department has warned that Hamas may violate its ceasefire with Israel by planning attacks on Palestinian civilians, raising concerns about the stability of the region.

The U.S. State Department issued a warning on Saturday regarding Hamas, stating that the group is reportedly planning to violate its ceasefire with Israel by launching attacks on civilians in Gaza. This potential breach of the peace agreement has raised alarms among international observers.

“This planned attack against Palestinian civilians would constitute a direct and grave violation of the ceasefire agreement and undermine the significant progress achieved through mediation efforts,” the State Department said in a statement shared on social media. The department emphasized that the guarantors of the ceasefire expect Hamas to uphold its obligations under the terms of the agreement.

The United States, along with other guarantors, remains committed to ensuring the safety of civilians and maintaining calm in the region. The goal is to advance peace and prosperity for the people of Gaza and the surrounding areas.

A ceasefire between Israel and Hamas came into effect last weekend, marking a significant development after two years of conflict that escalated following the attacks on southern Israel on October 7, 2023. As part of the ceasefire agreement, the remaining 20 Israeli hostages were returned to Israel, although more than a dozen remains of hostages who were killed are still under Hamas control.

In light of the potential threat, the State Department indicated that “measures will be taken to protect the people of Gaza and preserve the integrity of the ceasefire” if Hamas proceeds with its planned attacks.

On Thursday, former President Donald Trump issued a stern warning on Truth Social, following the circulation of footage showing Hamas fighters executing Palestinians in Gaza City’s main square. Trump stated, “If Hamas continues to kill people in Gaza, which was not the deal, we will have no choice but to go in and kill them.”

Reports from Reuters indicate that at least 33 individuals were executed by Hamas in recent days, which officials described as part of a campaign to “show strength” after the ceasefire was established. Israeli sources have reported that most of those killed were members of families accused of collaborating with Israel or supporting rival militias.

Trump later clarified that U.S. troops would not be deployed into Gaza, stating, “It’s not going to be us. We won’t have to. There are people very close, very nearby that will go in, and they’ll do the trick very easily, but under our auspices.”

The situation remains fluid, and the international community is closely monitoring developments as tensions persist in the region.

Source: Original article

Diwali Celebration at Chicago City Hall Unites Indian-American Communities

Chicago’s City Hall illuminated with vibrant Diwali festivities on October 8, 2025, bringing together diverse communities in a celebration of light, unity, and cultural appreciation.

Chicago, IL – On Wednesday, October 8, 2025, Chicago’s City Hall was transformed into a radiant Diwali spectacle, adorned with vibrant decorations and lights that welcomed hundreds of attendees. The event, organized by FIA Chicago and the INDO-US Lions Club in collaboration with Cook County Treasurer Maria Pappas, celebrated the Festival of Lights in the heart of the city’s Loop.

Under a crisp October sky, families dressed in colorful saris and kurtas mingled with city officials, holding diyas—small clay lamps that symbolize faith and unity. The air was fragrant with marigolds and incense, creating an atmosphere of togetherness and hope.

The ceremony commenced with warm greetings from Treasurer Maria Pappas, who emphasized the significance of light overcoming darkness. Her words inspired attendees to carry positivity into their daily lives. Leaders from the Indian community, including Anu Malhotra, Sunil Shah, Hina Trivedi, and Ajeet Singh, welcomed the crowd and led them in prayers, chanting “Om” to fill the hall with serene vibrations.

Anu Malhotra shared insights into Diwali’s deeper meaning, highlighting how the festival unites communities and serves as a reminder of the triumph of goodness over evil. Guests, including the Consul General of Ukraine and the Deputy Consul General of India, participated in the celebrations, emphasizing global solidarity and cultural appreciation.

The event featured a mesmerizing classical dance performance by Madhura Sane of Nritya Natya Academy, which brought the story of Diwali to life through movement and rhythm. Additionally, awards and proclamations were presented to individuals recognized for their outstanding community service, honoring those dedicated to fostering cultural unity.

As the evening drew to a close, attendees enjoyed the distribution of Diwali prasad and refreshments. The glow of diyas symbolized hope, gratitude, and shared humanity. The celebration at City Hall underscored a powerful message: even a single flame can inspire countless others, reflecting light, unity, and joy in every heart.

FIA Chicago, the INDO-US Lions Club, and Maria Pappas showcased how cultural traditions can foster connections, reminding everyone that light—both literal and metaphorical—prevails, even in uncertain times.

Happy Diwali! May your inner lamp shine bright always.

Source: Original article

Practice Handwriting Skills: Tips for Indian-American Students

Handwriting, often overshadowed by digital communication, offers cognitive and emotional benefits that can enhance memory, learning, and overall well-being.

In an age dominated by keyboards and screens, the art of handwriting is becoming increasingly rare. Many people, including myself, find that most of their writing is done digitally—whether on a laptop, tablet, or smartphone. Handwriting has become a sporadic activity, reserved for quick reminders or notes taken during phone calls. As a result, my once legible handwriting has deteriorated into what I can only describe as a “chicken scrawl.” In moments of haste, I sometimes struggle to decipher my own notes. This realization has prompted me to consciously slow down and focus on improving my penmanship.

Reflecting on my academic years, I remember having good cursive handwriting. Classmates often borrowed my notes when they missed lectures, complimenting my ability to take clear and organized notes. This practice of writing by hand not only helped my peers but also forced me to concentrate on the professor’s words, enhancing my understanding and retention of the material.

Research supports the notion that handwriting can significantly impact cognitive processes. Dr. Audrey van der Meer, a neuroscientist and professor of neuropsychology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, has studied the differences in brain activity between handwriting and typing. Her findings reveal that writing by hand activates more areas of the brain compared to typing on a keyboard. “The whole brain is basically involved when you write by hand or draw,” she explains. In contrast, typing involves only simple finger movements, while handwriting requires intricate motions that engage multiple senses and brain regions.

Dr. van der Meer’s research indicates that the act of handwriting fosters increased connectivity across various parts of the brain, particularly in the parietal regions associated with sensory and motor processing. This heightened activity is linked to improved memory and learning. The synchronization of different brain areas during handwriting is correlated with enhanced cognitive function, suggesting that maintaining this practice could help mitigate cognitive decline as we age.

Interestingly, studies involving children who learn to read and write on tablets have shown that some struggle to differentiate between letters that are mirror images of each other, such as ‘b’ and ‘d.’ Researchers attribute this difficulty to the lack of physical engagement in forming the letters. Handwriting, with its unique motions for each letter, offers essential stimulation for both developing and aging brains. Dr. van der Meer emphasizes the importance of challenging our brains regularly, advocating for the preservation of handwriting as a vital aspect of our cultural heritage.

The cognitive and mental benefits of handwriting extend beyond memory enhancement. Engaging in this practice can boost critical thinking, inspire creativity, and promote mindfulness. Writing by hand encourages us to choose our words carefully and frame our thoughts with intention. It compels us to slow down, be patient, and focus on the task at hand. Moreover, studies have shown that handwriting serves as a therapeutic tool, offering emotional and psychological benefits. It can act as a mechanism for emotional release, reducing stress and anxiety while fostering self-awareness and a sense of accomplishment.

Are you surprised to learn that regular handwriting practice can be a powerful tool for improving health and well-being? The physical act of forming letters activates multiple brain regions and provides therapeutic benefits that can alleviate stress and anxiety. In today’s fast-paced, technology-driven world, where automation is prevalent, the ability to slow down and savor the present moment through handwriting is invaluable. Indeed, the pen can be mightier than the keyboard.

Reflecting on my own experiences, I recall a moment when I asked my uncle, a learned man in his late 80s, to recommend ten books on history and philosophy. He later presented me with a handwritten list in beautiful, elegant cursive—a skill that put my own handwriting to shame.

As I conclude this piece, I find myself contemplating whether the simple act of maintaining a personal journal and practicing cursive writing daily could help delay or mitigate cognitive decline as we age. Perhaps it’s time to rediscover the benefits of handwriting and embrace its potential for enhancing our lives.

Source: Original article

Republicans Criticize Anti-Trump Protests Amid Shutdown Negotiations

Republican lawmakers are criticizing the upcoming nationwide protests against President Trump, claiming that Democrats are prioritizing far-left activism over resolving the ongoing government shutdown.

As the federal government shutdown continues due to spending disagreements, Republican lawmakers have intensified their criticism of the nationwide protests planned for Saturday against President Donald Trump. Many GOP leaders have dismissed these events as “Hate America” rallies, asserting that they reflect the influence of far-left activism.

The protests, part of the “No Kings” movement, are expected to draw hundreds of thousands of participants across various cities in the United States. Several congressional Democrats have indicated their intention to attend, further fueling Republican claims that the demonstrations are politically motivated.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., expressed skepticism about whether Democratic leaders would be more open to negotiating a resolution to the shutdown after the protests. “It’ll be a collection of wild leftist policy priorities, and that’ll be on display for the whole country,” Johnson told Fox Business Network. “After that’s over, I hope there’s a few Democrats over here who will come to their senses and return to governing the country.” He added that he doubted Democrats would make any concessions before the rallies concluded, fearing backlash from their supporters.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., sidestepped a question about his attendance at the rallies, stating, “I haven’t finalized my schedule for the weekend given, you know, the sensitivities around the government shutdown.” He emphasized his support for Americans’ rights to express dissent against what he described as an “out-of-control administration.”

In contrast, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., confirmed his attendance at one of the protests, as did House Democratic Caucus Chairman Pete Aguilar, D-Calif. Rep. Zach Nunn, R-Iowa, speculated that more prominent Democratic figures would likely attend but echoed Johnson’s hope that they would be willing to negotiate afterward.

“My guess is if they don’t want a primary from the left, they’ll probably find a way to sneak it into their schedule,” Nunn remarked. “The real question is, do they have the fortitude after Saturday to come back and open up the government?”

House GOP leaders have criticized the rallies during their daily press conferences throughout the week. Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., accused Schumer of being “more concerned” with appeasing the protestors than with resolving the ongoing issues surrounding the shutdown. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., suggested that the protests were influencing Democratic lawmakers’ decisions. “The rumor is that they can’t end the shutdown beforehand because a small but very violent and vocal group is the only one that’s happy about this,” Emmer stated.

He continued, “If they shut it down beforehand, then they’ve got to deal with that group beforehand. If they make it through that, then at least they’ve made it through their Hate America rally, and then they can get this thing done.”

Last month, the House passed a bill to keep the federal government funded at current levels through November 21, known as a continuing resolution (CR). However, this measure has failed ten times in the Senate, with a majority of Democrats rejecting any spending deal that does not include an extension of COVID-19 pandemic-era Obamacare subsidies, which are set to expire at the end of the year without congressional action.

As the protests approach, the political landscape remains tense, with both parties entrenched in their positions. The outcome of the demonstrations and their potential impact on the ongoing shutdown negotiations remains to be seen.

Source: Original article

Top Democratic Leaders Remain Silent on AG Nominee’s Candidacy in Virginia

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries defends Virginia Democratic attorney general candidate Jay Jones, who faces backlash over violent text messages about his GOP rival.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a Democrat from New York, has expressed his support for Virginia’s Democratic attorney general candidate Jay Jones, despite the candidate being embroiled in controversy over violent text messages he sent regarding his Republican opponent.

Jones, who previously served as a state delegate, sent messages that included graphic fantasies about killing his GOP rival, Jason Miyares. In one text, he suggested putting “two bullets” in the head of then-House Speaker Todd Gilbert, and he also made disturbing comments about Gilbert’s children, implying that their deaths could be politically advantageous.

As calls for Jones to withdraw from the race intensify, Jeffries defended him, stating that Jones had appropriately apologized for his remarks. “The attorney general candidate has appropriately apologized for his remarks, and I know his remarks have been condemned across the board by Democrats in the commonwealth of Virginia and beyond,” Jeffries said. “And that’s the right thing to do.”

During a recent debate, Miyares, Jones’ GOP opponent, went so far as to demand that Jones disqualify himself from the race due to the resurfaced messages. The debate highlighted the severity of the situation, with Miyares asserting that Jones would not be able to pass a background check to serve as a prosecutor in any attorney general’s office across the country.

The controversy began when text messages sent by Jones to a colleague, Delegate Carrie Coyner, R-Hopewell, resurfaced. In these messages, Jones imagined a scenario where he would choose to kill Gilbert over historical figures Pol Pot or Adolf Hitler. He wrote, “Three people, two bullets. Gilbert, Hitler and Pol Pot. Gilbert gets two bullets to the head.” In a follow-up message, he stated, “Spoiler: put Gilbert in the crew with the two worst people you know and he receives both bullets every time.”

Jones also expressed a wish for Gilbert’s children to die, stating that such grief might be “a good thing” if it advanced his political agenda. Despite the graphic nature of these messages, many Democratic leaders have refrained from calling for Jones to step down from the race.

Virginia gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger faced questions during her own debate about whether she would call on Jones to withdraw, but she declined to do so. This reluctance among Democratic leaders to distance themselves from Jones has raised eyebrows, especially given the violent nature of his comments.

In the aftermath of the scandal, Jones publicly expressed his shame and embarrassment over the messages during the debate with Miyares. “And I am sorry. I am sorry to Speaker Gilbert. I am sorry to his family. And I am sorry to every single Virginian,” he stated, attempting to address the fallout from his past remarks.

However, when pressed about whether his judgment should be questioned in light of the text message scandal and other incidents, including a reckless driving conviction, Jones did not provide a clear answer. His past behavior has come under scrutiny as voters consider his candidacy for attorney general.

In addition to the violent rhetoric, Jones has faced criticism for allegedly trying to evade community service requirements imposed by a judge following his reckless driving conviction. These issues have compounded the challenges he faces in his campaign.

As the election approaches, the fallout from Jones’ text messages continues to loom over his candidacy, raising questions about his fitness for office and the broader implications for the Democratic Party in Virginia.

Source: Original article

Trump and Zelenskyy to Discuss Tomahawk Missile Support for Ukraine

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is set to meet with President Donald Trump to discuss acquiring American Tomahawk missiles as Ukraine seeks stronger defenses against ongoing Russian aggression.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is scheduled to meet with President Donald Trump at the White House on Friday. The meeting aims to address significant defensive measures and strategies to counter Russia’s ongoing military actions in Ukraine.

This meeting comes just a day after Trump held a phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Zelenskyy’s primary objective during this visit is to secure enhanced military support for Ukraine, particularly in the form of American Tomahawk missiles. These missiles are known for their long-range precision and capability to strike targets deep within enemy territory.

The Tomahawk missile system could potentially allow Ukraine to target not only Russian military installations but also critical components of its oil industry, which has been a significant source of funding for Putin’s military operations. However, experts caution that no single weapon system can serve as a definitive solution to the challenges Ukraine faces.

John Hardie, deputy director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ Russia Program, emphasized that a multifaceted approach is necessary to effectively counter Russia’s military strategy. “No one weapon system is going to be a wonder weapon or a game changer, per se,” he told Fox News Digital. Hardie advocates for a combination of increased missile capabilities for Ukraine and economic measures aimed at undermining Russia’s war funding.

He noted that targeting Russia’s economy through sanctions and disrupting its oil industry are crucial steps to weaken its military efforts. “Putin still seems to believe, or chooses to believe, that he can grind down Ukrainian forces in this war of attrition,” Hardie said. “The goal should be to exhaust the Russian military’s offensive potential.”

While the Tomahawk missiles would enhance Ukraine’s long-range strike capabilities, Hardie pointed out that there are other systems that could be more effectively utilized for Ukraine’s immediate needs. For instance, the Extended-Range Attack Munition (ERAM) missiles, which are designed specifically for Ukraine, are expected to begin arriving in October.

In addition, Hardie highlighted the importance of defensive systems, such as Patriot missile batteries, which are essential for protecting Ukraine against Russia’s persistent missile and drone attacks.

Following his conversation with Putin, Trump remarked that “great progress” was made, although he did not elaborate on the specifics of their discussion. The two leaders agreed to meet again in Hungary, but it remains unclear whether U.S. aid to Ukraine was a topic of conversation.

During the call, Trump suggested he might need to discuss with Putin the implications of placing U.S. Tomahawk missiles near Russian borders, which seemed to signal a potential threat. However, the details of the conversation did not include any mention of Tomahawks or defensive assistance for Ukraine.

According to Russian presidential aide Yuri Ushakov, the issue of Tomahawk missiles was indeed discussed, but Putin opposed the idea. Ushakov stated, “Vladimir Putin reiterated his thesis that Tomahawks won’t change the situation on the battlefield, but they will cause significant damage to relations between our countries. Not to mention the prospects for a peaceful settlement.”

As Zelenskyy prepares for his meeting with Trump, the stakes remain high for Ukraine as it seeks to bolster its defenses against ongoing Russian aggression.

Source: Original article

Tech Giants, Including Amazon and Google, Attend White House Dinner

President Donald Trump hosted a White House dinner for nearly 130 influential supporters and corporate leaders, celebrating a significant renovation project and unveiling new initiatives.

On Wednesday evening, President Donald Trump welcomed nearly 130 top donors, corporate allies, and influential supporters to a White House dinner. The event celebrated their commitments to a new, expansive ballroom, which is projected to cost around $250 million.

This ballroom renovation represents the largest undertaking of Trump’s second term, reflecting his background as a real estate developer. A White House official confirmed that representatives from major companies, including Amazon, Apple, Booz Allen Hamilton, Coinbase, Comcast, Google, Lockheed Martin, Meta, and T-Mobile, were in attendance. The Adelson Family Foundation, founded by prominent GOP donors Miriam Adelson and her late husband Sheldon, was also present at the gathering.

Among the notable guests were oil magnate Harold Hamm, Blackstone CEO Steve Schwarzman, Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler and her husband Jeff Sprecher, as well as cryptocurrency entrepreneurs Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, as reported by The Wall Street Journal.

During the dinner, Trump described the ballroom as a space that would feature bulletproof glass on all four sides, grand enough to host a presidential inauguration. He emphasized that the design elements, including window shapes, molding, and color, would align with the historic aesthetic of the White House. “To me, there’s nothing like the White House,” Trump remarked, adding, “It’s just a special place so we have to take care of it.”

The new ballroom is set to occupy the area currently housing the East Wing and will cover an impressive 90,000 square feet. Initially, the White House indicated that the venue would accommodate 650 guests, but Trump announced that it could actually host up to 999 people.

Despite the ambitious plans, the ballroom has not yet received clearance from the National Capital Planning Commission or the Commission of Fine Arts, which typically review federal construction projects. However, White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf, appointed by Trump to lead the planning commission, stated that such approval is not necessary. During the dinner, Trump asserted that as president, he faces no zoning restrictions and can proceed with the project as he deems fit.

In addition to the ballroom announcement, Trump introduced a separate initiative to construct an arch at one end of the Arlington Memorial Bridge, which connects Virginia and Washington, D.C. He showcased three scale models of the proposed arch, which will feature Lady Liberty atop it, noting that the largest model was his preferred design. “It’s going to be really beautiful,” Trump stated.

The presence of major corporations and high-profile tech leaders at the dinner underscores the growing alignment between Trump’s vision and the business community. Their investments and commitments reflect not only financial support but also a shared interest in shaping projects that resonate with the president’s ambitions. This gathering signals a deepening partnership between private enterprise and the initiatives of the Trump administration.

Source: Original article

Jay Jones’ Controversial Text Messages Anticipated to Shape Virginia AG Debate

Former Virginia delegate Jay Jones is facing intense scrutiny over violent text messages, which are expected to overshadow his upcoming debate against Republican Jason Miyares.

Former Virginia state delegate Jay Jones is under fire for violent messages he sent regarding a Republican lawmaker, which are anticipated to dominate the attorney general debate scheduled for Thursday at the University of Richmond. The controversy has attracted national attention, with President Donald Trump and Republican leaders seizing upon Jones’ remarks and the muted response from fellow Democrats.

Recent polling data from Christopher Newport University, conducted on October 3 before the scandal erupted, indicated that Jones was leading Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares by six points. Other Democratic candidates on the statewide ticket were enjoying similar advantages. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that the race is tightening, as Miyares has taken on a significant role in the Republican campaign while Jones’ support appears to be waning.

During a recent debate in Norfolk, Republican gubernatorial candidate Winsome Earle-Sears pressed Democratic nominee Abigail Spanberger about whether Jones should withdraw from the race. Spanberger refrained from calling for his resignation, stating that it should be left to the voters to decide. However, several constituents in the Shenandoah Valley expressed disappointment over her lack of a stronger stance on the issue.

Jones’ fellow Democrats have largely remained silent or offered vague support for the embattled candidate as he continues his campaign, despite indications that his troubles could negatively impact the entire Democratic ticket. Current Virginia House Speaker Don Scott Jr., a Democrat from Portsmouth, defended Jones when addressing the media after the gubernatorial debate. He drew parallels between Jones’ situation and comments made by Trump regarding Wyoming Republican Liz Cheney facing threats for her political stances.

Senate President L. Louise Lucas and caucus campaign chief Sen. Mamie Locke later issued a joint statement backing Jones, cautioning that keeping Miyares in office would be a worse outcome for the state.

Meanwhile, Earle-Sears has garnered significant support from the Republican base, similar to the backing received by Governor Glenn Youngkin during his campaign. However, she continues to trail Spanberger in recent polling. Miyares appears to have either closed the gap or slightly surpassed Jones in the latest surveys, a development that political analysts suggest may dampen Democratic turnout for the entire ticket.

Republican lieutenant gubernatorial candidate John Reid recently claimed on social media that he has narrowed the gap to within a point or two of his challenger, Sen. Ghazala Hashmi, a Democrat from Chesterfield. However, the specifics of the surveys he referenced were not immediately verifiable. These developments indicate a tightening race in a state that has been leaning increasingly blue.

In 2021, Republican Glenn Youngkin achieved an upset victory, capitalizing on parental rights concerns regarding transgender athletes in school sports. Earle-Sears has since championed similar issues while criticizing Democrats for their silence or ambivalence regarding Jones’ continued candidacy.

Youngkin’s victory over Terry McAuliffe was an anomaly in recent Virginia elections, particularly when compared to Republican military veteran Hung Cao’s significant defeat against Sen. Tim Kaine in the subsequent 2024 election. Vice President Kamala Harris also defeated Trump that year.

Historically, Republicans maintained a presence in the populous northern Virginia region. Corey Stewart, a staunch conservative and former Prince William County chairman, unsuccessfully sought statewide office but remained influential in local leadership for many years. Although opposed to Trump’s brand of Republicanism, former Representative Barbara Comstock was a well-regarded officeholder in the now-progressive Loudoun County area. Currently, Del. Geary Higgins remains the only Republican delegate in the once-red county west of Washington, facing a challenging race against Warrenton innkeeper John McAuliff in November.

During his campaign, Youngkin made multiple visits to southwest Virginia to bolster turnout in Republican strongholds. This strategy, combined with support from concerned parents in northern Virginia’s Democratic-leaning suburbs, contributed to his electoral success.

Jones’ controversial messages, first reported earlier this month, included a text to Del. Carrie Coyner, a Republican from Hopewell, in which he envisioned firing “two bullets” into the head of then-House Speaker Todd Gilbert. He described Gilbert as worse than notorious dictators Pol Pot and Adolf Hitler, and referred to Gilbert’s young children as “fascists.” These revelations have sparked bipartisan condemnation, yet Democratic leaders have largely resisted calls, including from Youngkin, for Jones to withdraw from the race.

Source: Original article

California Connects Initiative Aims to Strengthen Grassroots Networking for Indian-Americans

California’s Office of Community Partnerships and Strategic Communications has launched California Connects, a statewide initiative aimed at enhancing collaboration between government agencies and grassroots organizations.

In a significant move to bolster partnerships between government entities and grassroots organizations, the Office of Community Partnerships and Strategic Communications (OCPSC) launched California Connects on October 8 in San Francisco. This initiative kicked off a series of networking events designed to foster collaboration and resource sharing among community-based organizations, state agencies, local leaders, and philanthropic partners.

The inaugural event took place at The Hyatt Regency and marked the first of eight regional convenings scheduled across the state. Participants from the Bay Area engaged in hands-on workshops, skill-building sessions, and discussions focused on accessing resources and funding opportunities.

Following the San Francisco event, California Connects will continue its journey to cities including Los Angeles, Anaheim, Sacramento, Riverside, Oxnard, San Diego, and will conclude on November 18 in Fresno.

Nearly 250 attendees, representing around 100 local community organizations, nonprofits, and government agencies, participated in the San Francisco gathering. The convenings are spearheaded by GO-Serve, the Governor’s Office of Service and Community Engagement, which aims to unify programs that promote both paid and volunteer services, enhance youth and community engagement, and raise awareness about outreach campaigns.

Aubrie Fong, the acting executive director of OCPSC, emphasized the importance of this initiative during an interview. “This is the first time that the Office of Community Partnerships and Strategic Communications is housed within the Governor’s Office of Service and Community Engagement. We are bringing all of our partners together for the first time,” she stated. This collaboration is intended to improve coordination among local partners from the OCPSC, California Volunteers, and the Youth Empowerment Commission.

Fong noted the increasing scarcity of resources for organizations and highlighted the event’s focus on building relationships and regional collaboration. “Today is about building relationships, regional collaboration, and hopefully connecting them with some great state resources,” she said.

During her address, Fong pointed out that the organizations represented at the convening serve a diverse and vulnerable population. Over 70 percent of the attending organizations focus on youth services, with offerings available in 50 languages. More than half of the groups present cater to households with limited English proficiency, immigrants, refugees, older adults, and LGBTQ+ communities.

Josh Fryday, the GO-Serve director and California Chief Service Officer, addressed the audience about the importance of grassroots organizations. He remarked on the necessity of connecting communities amid a climate of division and polarization. “You can’t engage people when you’re in silos,” he said. “We have to acknowledge that we are living in a different moment right now.” Fryday expressed hope that the convening would provide attendees with new resources and collaborative opportunities to better serve their communities.

State Senator Scott Wiener, representing District 11 in San Francisco and serving as the Chair of the Senate Budget Committee, delivered a keynote address that underscored the significance of local engagement. “Ultimately, everything has to be organized and executed at the local level… that’s who people trust in their community,” he stated. Wiener emphasized the urgent need to rebuild the “social infrastructure” that has been deteriorating in recent years, noting that increased disconnection among individuals can lead to negative societal impacts.

Amy Lerman, a political science professor and executive director of the Possibility Lab at UC Berkeley, echoed this sentiment. She urged attendees to seek partnerships beyond their immediate communities. “It’s not enough anymore just to talk to the people in your own community or who look like you, think like you,” she said. Lerman encouraged participants to identify “unusual allies” and collaborate on shared goals.

With nearly 70 percent of the organizations at the convening focused on youth, many are actively collaborating with state agencies. The event also highlighted the California Men’s Service Challenge, a GO-Serve initiative that encourages young men and boys to serve as mentors, coaches, and tutors through the California Service Corps. This initiative follows Governor Gavin Newsom’s executive order aimed at addressing rising mental health challenges among young men and boys, including high suicide rates and social isolation.

For those interested in state resources, volunteer and paid service opportunities, and funding options, additional information can be found on the California Grants Portal, GO-Serve, OCPSC, the California Men’s Service Challenge, the Youth Empowerment Commission, and California Volunteers.

Source: Original article

IDF Confirms Body Returned by Hamas Does Not Match Hostages

The Israel Defense Forces confirmed that a body handed over by Hamas does not correspond to any of the deceased hostages, prompting calls for further efforts to recover them.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) announced that one of the four bodies surrendered by Hamas does not match any of the deceased hostages. This revelation came after examinations were conducted at the National Institute of Forensic Medicine.

The IDF stated, “Following the completion of examinations, the fourth body handed over to Israel by Hamas does not match any of the hostages.” The military organization emphasized that Hamas is obligated to make all necessary efforts to return the deceased hostages.

All living hostages were released as part of a deal facilitated by former President Donald Trump. In a post on Truth Social, Trump expressed his relief regarding the return of the hostages but underscored the importance of recovering the bodies of those who did not survive.

Trump wrote, “ALL TWENTY HOSTAGES ARE BACK AND FEELING AS GOOD AS CAN BE EXPECTED. A big burden has been lifted, but the job IS NOT DONE. THE DEAD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED, AS PROMISED! Phase Two begins right NOW!!!”

This situation remains fluid, and updates will continue to emerge as more information becomes available.

Source: Original article

Supreme Court Provides Relief for H-4 EAD Holders Amid Uncertainty

The Supreme Court’s decision to decline a challenge to the H-4 EAD program offers temporary relief to immigrant spouses, yet experts caution that its future remains uncertain amid shifting political landscapes.

The Supreme Court’s recent decision not to hear a challenge against the H-4 work authorization has provided a moment of stability for thousands of immigrant spouses. However, experts warn that the program’s future is still closely tied to the unpredictable nature of political will.

In recent months, the immigration landscape in the United States has been tumultuous, with work visa holders facing significant uncertainty due to abrupt policy changes from the Trump administration. Amid this chaos, a cautious sense of optimism has emerged for H-4 EAD (Employment Authorization Document) holders, who are primarily spouses of H-1B visa holders.

On Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court declined to review a petition filed by Save Jobs USA, which sought to challenge a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. This ruling affirmed that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had the authority to implement the H-4 EAD rule. The news was met with celebrations among H-4 EAD holders, who viewed the decision as a protective measure for their work authorization.

Johnson Myalil, an immigration attorney based in the Washington, D.C., area, expressed cautious optimism about the ruling. “In some ways, it is good news, as it removes the uncertainty of the court invalidating the H-4 employment authorization, which is used by a substantial number of highly educated spouses of H-1B professionals—estimated to be around at least 300,000,” he stated.

Despite the positive implications of the Supreme Court’s decision, experts caution that challenges remain. Nandini Nair, an immigration attorney at A.Y. Strauss, LLC, emphasized the need for caution. “Absolutely not,” she said when asked if the decision alleviates uncertainty for H-4 EAD holders. “While the Supreme Court declined review this time, a different case with a stronger factual or procedural posture could make its way up again. The program is safe for now, but its survival depends on regulatory stability and political will.”

Nair further noted that for the H-4 EAD program to achieve true permanence, it would need to be codified by Congress rather than relying solely on regulation. “But for today, we can breathe a bit easier,” she added.

The history of the H-4 EAD program has been fraught with challenges. Introduced in 2015 during President Barack Obama’s administration, the program faced immediate opposition from Save Jobs USA, which argued that the DHS had overstepped its authority. This led to years of litigation, leaving many H-4 EAD holders in limbo as companies hesitated to hire them amid ongoing uncertainty.

Myalil remains cautious about the program’s future, stating, “We cannot rule out the possibility that immigration restriction advocates in the Trump administration may push for the cancellation of H-4 EAD through the federal rulemaking process.” However, he also pointed out a silver lining: “That process can take several years.”

Critics of the H-4 work authorization often argue that it takes job opportunities away from American workers. Yet, mounting evidence and legal testimony suggest the opposite—that H-4 EAD holders have made significant economic contributions. Nair highlighted that H-4 EAD holders are predominantly women who contribute billions in household income and tax revenue. Many work in high-demand STEM fields, launch startups, open businesses, and even employ U.S. workers.

“H-4 EADs aren’t just about helping immigrant families; they’re about unlocking untapped talent, boosting the U.S. economy, promoting equity, and stabilizing the workforce. This program has actually been a net gain for the United States,” Nair asserted.

Her argument is supported by data. A 2019 analysis by the American Action Forum, utilizing U.S. Census data, estimated that H-4 workers contribute approximately $12.9 billion annually to the U.S. GDP. This figure could rise to between $40 and $41 billion if all eligible spouses were authorized to work. A 2024 report by FWD.us found that removing current H-4 EAD holders from the workforce would shrink annual GDP by $7.5 billion and cut tax revenues by $2 billion across federal, state, and local levels.

Despite these positive contributions, the H-4 EAD program has often been unfairly criticized, similar to the H-1B visa program. This criticism often stems from widespread misconceptions about immigration’s role in the American economy. Nair noted, “They often get a bad rap because of the persistent narrative that H-1B visa holders ‘take American jobs.’ That same mindset spills over to the H-4 EAD program.”

She concluded, “The controversy isn’t really about H-4 spouses at all—it’s about the larger debate over high-skilled immigration.”

Source: Original article

Trump Awards Charlie Kirk Presidential Medal of Freedom Posthumously

President Donald Trump posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to conservative activist Charlie Kirk during a ceremony at the White House.

In a poignant ceremony at the White House, President Donald Trump posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative activist known for his advocacy and influence within the Republican Party.

The event, which took place in the East Room, was attended by family members of Kirk, who passed away earlier this year. Trump praised Kirk’s contributions to the conservative movement and his dedication to promoting conservative values among young Americans.

During the ceremony, Trump highlighted Kirk’s efforts in founding Turning Point USA, an organization aimed at educating students about free markets and limited government. The President noted that Kirk’s work has inspired countless young people to engage in political discourse and activism.

As the Medal of Freedom was presented, the atmosphere in the room was filled with a mix of solemnity and celebration. Family members of Kirk expressed their gratitude for the recognition, reflecting on his legacy and the impact he had on the conservative landscape.

The Presidential Medal of Freedom is one of the highest civilian honors in the United States, awarded to individuals who have made significant contributions to the national interests of the country, world peace, or cultural endeavors.

Trump’s decision to honor Kirk posthumously underscores the former President’s commitment to recognizing individuals who align with his administration’s values and priorities. The ceremony served as a reminder of Kirk’s influence and the ongoing conversation about the role of activism in shaping political narratives.

As the event concluded, attendees were left to reflect on Kirk’s legacy and the importance of continued engagement in the political process, particularly among younger generations.

According to Fox News, the ceremony was a fitting tribute to a man who dedicated his life to advocating for conservative principles and empowering the next generation of leaders.

Source: Original article

Governor Newsom Vetoes SB509, Indian-American Groups Express Support

Governor Gavin Newsom’s veto of Senate Bill 509 has been welcomed by various Indian American groups, who expressed concerns about potential divisions within California’s diverse communities.

Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed Senate Bill 509 (SB 509) on Sunday, October 12, effectively sparing diverse diasporic communities in California from what critics described as “potential divisions over redundant transnational repression training mandates.”

Authored by Senator Anna Caballero (D-Merced), SB 509 aimed to establish a specialized law enforcement training program designed to help officers recognize and respond to transnational repression. This term refers to the harassment, threats, and intimidation perpetrated by foreign governments against diaspora communities within the United States. The bill was co-authored by Senators Jasmeet Bains (D-35, Bakersfield) and Esmeralda Soria (D-27, Merced).

In a statement accompanying the introduction of SB 509, Caballero noted that authoritarian regimes worldwide are extending their influence into the U.S., targeting immigrant, refugee, and asylum-seeker communities. These governments employ methods such as digital surveillance, social media monitoring, and covert intimidation tactics to silence dissent and suppress free expression, even within U.S. borders.

“Just as law enforcement is trained to identify domestic violence and human trafficking, they must also be prepared to protect communities targeted by foreign governments,” Caballero stated. “SB 509 is about justice, dignity, and ensuring that no one in California lives in fear because of who they are or where they come from. All Californians deserve to feel safe in their homes, workplaces, and neighborhoods.”

California’s diverse communities, particularly ethnic and religious minorities who have fled oppressive regimes, have frequently been targets of abuse. However, local police often lack the training necessary to identify these issues or assist victims effectively. SB 509 received support from both police leaders and immigrant rights organizations, including the California Police Chiefs Association and Immigrant Defense Advocates. The bill proposed that the Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), in consultation with the Commission on Peace Officer Standards, develop training to identify and respond to transnational repression.

Despite its support, SB 509 faced criticism from certain Hindu and Indian American groups, who expressed concerns about legislative overreach and the potential for stigmatization of communities of Indian origin. Ajay Jain Bhutoria, a vocal opponent of the bill, argued that its focus on specific training for local law enforcement duplicated existing federal guidelines from the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. He warned that this could lead to unnecessary profiling and fracture alliances within California’s vibrant South Asian diaspora.

Grassroots organizations such as the Hindu American Foundation (HAF) and the Coalition of Hindus of North America (CoHNA) mobilized against the bill, organizing protests, circulating petitions, and hosting community forums to halt its progress in Sacramento. Despite their efforts, the bill continued to gain traction, highlighting the challenges of opposing bipartisan support without direct access to executive power.

Although the bill passed the state legislature, it was ultimately vetoed by Governor Newsom. In his statement, the Governor explained that the issue would be more effectively addressed through administrative processes in coordination with federal agencies. He emphasized that, in the absence of a consistent federal definition, the bill would limit the state’s flexibility and could lead to future inconsistencies in its implementation.

The veto was met with approval from critics of the bill. Bhutoria remarked, “His veto of SB 509 preserves our harmony, ensuring that we build bridges rather than barriers among diaspora communities.”

Source: Original article

National Program Aims to Help Seniors Identify Scams Amid Rising Losses

As scams targeting older Americans surge, AARP launches Senior Planet, a national program designed to help seniors identify fraud and protect themselves from financial losses.

Scams targeting older Americans are on the rise, prompting federal officials to issue warnings about increasingly sophisticated tactics used by criminals. According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), scammers are impersonating IRS agents, police officers, and other officials, often through phone calls or online communications, to steal significant sums of money.

The FTC reports that scams involving losses exceeding $10,000 have quadrupled in recent years. Additionally, the FBI has indicated that older adults filed the highest number of scam complaints last year, with average losses soaring to $83,000—an increase of 43% from the previous year.

In response to this alarming trend, AARP has launched Senior Planet, a national initiative that offers free fraud-awareness classes to Americans aged 60 and older. The program aims to equip participants with the skills needed to identify warning signs, recognize fraudulent communications, and avoid sharing sensitive information under pressure.

Rick Planos, an instructor for Senior Planet in Illinois, shares a personal connection to the issue. His mother fell victim to a scam, losing over $2,500 in gift cards after being misled by a scammer who claimed her grandson had been arrested. “My mom was distraught,” Planos recounted. “First, she was distraught that one of her grandchildren was arrested – and then it turned out that wasn’t true. And then she was distraught that she got scammed.”

Planos now leads scam prevention classes in his community, channeling his family’s experience into a mission to protect others. “I spend a lot of time teaching for AARP. I took what happened to us and put it into some kind of positive energy to protect other people,” he said.

Senior Planet conducts regular in-person classes in Denver and offers the program online, reaching seniors in several states, including Texas, Maryland, and New York. Aaron Santis, program lead for Senior Planet Colorado, emphasizes the importance of discussing risks while also leveraging technology to enhance participants’ lives. “It’s important to talk about where the risks and dangers are,” Santis noted. “But we’re also using technology as a tool to enrich people’s lives.”

Carolyn Gibson, a recent participant in the program, expressed her motivation for joining. “I came over here to find out who is this AI, what is this AI. The people here, they’ve been very helpful,” she said, referring to her interest in new technologies and the need for scam protection.

Instructors at Senior Planet encourage participants to take their time, verify information, and never feel rushed into sharing personal details—especially when contacted by someone claiming to represent a government agency. The program not only focuses on fraud awareness but also helps seniors learn new skills, save money, improve their health, and foster social connections.

The FTC reminds consumers that legitimate government agencies will never demand money over the phone. If you receive a suspicious call, it is advisable to hang up, visit the agency’s official website, and report the scam directly.

As scams continue to evolve, initiatives like AARP’s Senior Planet play a crucial role in empowering seniors to recognize and combat fraud, ultimately helping to protect their financial well-being.

Source: Original article

Beware of Fake Settlement Sites That Compromise Your Data Security

Fraudulent settlement sites are targeting consumers with deceptive practices, including requests for personal information and processing fees, as scammers exploit recent class action payouts.

In the wake of significant class action settlements, such as Facebook’s $725 million payout and AT&T’s $177 million distribution, scammers are increasingly targeting consumers with fraudulent settlement claims. These scams often manifest as convincing emails and websites designed to steal personal information, including Social Security numbers and banking details.

As legitimate settlement claims are processed, the rise of fake settlement sites has become a pressing concern for consumers. These sites typically feature generic layouts and long URLs, making them easy for scammers to replicate. A recent demonstration revealed how quickly a fake settlement site can be created using AI tools, underscoring the ease with which criminals can exploit these shortcuts.

Facebook has been a prime target for such scams. In the past, a fraudulent site emerged around the Equifax settlement, deceiving thousands of individuals before it was taken down. This incident serves as a reminder that while some sites may appear unusual, it is crucial to verify their legitimacy before providing any personal information.

To avoid falling victim to these scams, consumers should be vigilant and look for common warning signs. If a site requests your full Social Security number or sensitive personal information, it is a red flag. For instance, the official Equifax settlement only required the last six digits of Social Security numbers. Genuine settlement sites typically ask for limited information, such as the last four digits of your SSN, and rarely demand complete details.

Another indicator of a fraudulent site is the urgency they create. Scammers often pressure individuals to act quickly, whereas legitimate settlement sites do not impose strict deadlines for claims. Additionally, real settlement administrators will never require payment to file a claim or receive a payout. If a site requests “administrative fees” or “processing charges,” it is advisable to close it immediately.

Scammers also utilize fake security seals to create a false sense of trust. Consumers should ensure that any security seals on a site are recognizable, clickable, and verifiable. Furthermore, legitimate settlement sites will provide multiple, verifiable contact methods. If the email or phone number associated with a site appears suspicious or matches an unusual domain, it is a significant warning sign.

Before filing any claims, consumers can take several steps to ensure they are dealing with a legitimate settlement site. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) maintains updated lists of approved class action settlements on its website, which always ends in .gov. If a claim notice directs you to a different URL, it is wise to approach it with caution. Trusted news outlets often report on large settlements and provide safe links for consumers.

For those who prefer to avoid digital phishing altogether, sending a paper claim form can be a safer option. Additionally, strong antivirus software can help block malicious links and alert users to potential threats, safeguarding personal information and digital assets.

Data removal services can also assist in protecting personal information by scrubbing it from broker lists, making it more challenging for criminals to target individuals. While no service can guarantee complete data removal from the internet, these services actively monitor and erase personal information from various websites, providing peace of mind to users.

Consumers should remain skeptical when encountering settlement notices. It is essential to check URLs, avoid clicking on direct links, and refrain from providing details that do not align with the claim’s purpose. The goal of a settlement payout is to aid recovery, not to expose individuals to further risk.

As class action settlements can feel like rare victories for consumers, it is crucial to remain vigilant against the tactics employed by scammers. By following these guidelines and exercising caution, individuals can protect themselves from falling victim to fraudulent settlement sites.

For more information on how to spot phishing scams and protect your personal information, visit CyberGuy.com.

Source: Original article

Trump Claims Nobel Winner Told Him He Deserved the Honor

President Donald Trump claims Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado dedicated her Nobel Peace Prize to him, citing his support for her democratic efforts in Venezuela.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Donald Trump, who has expressed a desire for the Nobel Peace Prize, stated that Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, the recipient of this year’s award, accepted it “in his honor.” He attributed this dedication to his support for her democratic initiatives in Venezuela.

During a press briefing at the White House on October 10, Trump revealed that Machado had called him to share the news of her award. “The person who got the Nobel Prize called me today and said, ‘I am accepting this in honor of you because you really deserved it.’ I didn’t say, ‘Give it to me,’ though. I’ve been helping her along the way. They needed a lot of help in Venezuela during the disaster. I am happy because I saved millions of lives,” Trump remarked.

Machado was awarded the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for her “brave and committed” efforts in promoting democratic rights and leading the movement for a peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy in Venezuela, as announced by the Norwegian Nobel Committee.

In its statement, the Committee praised Machado as “a woman who keeps the flame of democracy burning amid a growing darkness,” emphasizing that “democracy is a precondition for lasting peace.” The Committee noted that her struggle reflects broader global challenges to democratic values, highlighting the Venezuelan regime’s oppressive hold on power, the silencing of media, and the imprisonment of critics as part of a troubling global trend.

Trump also suggested that he should have been recognized for his contributions to global peace efforts. “I said, ‘Well, what about the seven others? I should get a Nobel Prize for each one,’” he commented.

The Nobel Committee concluded that Machado’s leadership “embodies the hope of a different future, one where the fundamental rights of citizens are protected, and their voices are heard.” They affirmed that she meets all three criteria outlined in Alfred Nobel’s will for the selection of a peace laureate.

According to ANI, Trump’s remarks reflect his ongoing interest in international recognition and his belief in the significance of his support for democratic movements abroad.

Source: Original article

Dozens Killed in Gaza Amid Violence Between Hamas and Armed Clans

At least 64 people have died in Gaza amid violent clashes between Hamas and local militias, coinciding with the anticipated release of hostages by the militant group.

At least 64 individuals, including 52 members of the Doghmush clan and 12 Hamas militants, have been killed in violent confrontations in Gaza. The clashes erupted on Sunday, shortly before the expected release of hostages in the war-torn region, according to local reports.

The fighting unfolded as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepared to deliver a televised address, in which he described the imminent hostage release as “the beginning of a new path.” However, he cautioned that “the campaign is not over” and that significant security challenges remain.

Witnesses reported that gunfire sent families fleeing in panic. “This time people weren’t fleeing Israeli attacks. They were running from their own people,” one witness told the BBC.

The violence reportedly began when Hamas militants launched an assault on the Sabra neighborhood in Gaza City, home to the Doghmush clan, also known as the Al Doghmush family militia. According to Israeli outlet Ynet, the Hamas Interior Ministry accused the clan of attacking its forces, while members of the Doghmush clan claimed that Hamas exploited the ceasefire to target them due to alleged cooperation with Israel.

“Children are screaming and dying; they are burning our houses,” a relative of the clan told Ynet. Another member lamented, “We are trapped. I don’t know how they entered with all kinds of weapons. Where were they when the Jews were here? They arrested all the youths, lined them up against walls, pointed weapons at their heads. There is a massacre here.”

In addition to the casualties among the Doghmush clan and Hamas militants, reports indicated that Salah al-Ja‘farawi, a blogger who had celebrated the October 7 attacks online, was killed during the clashes. Hamas’s television channel claimed he was shot dead by “armed gangs operating outside the law.” The son of senior Hamas official Basem Naim was also reported among the deceased.

A senior member of the Doghmush clan expressed a sentiment of unity, stating, “We still say – you must not shed Muslim blood by a Muslim.”

In response to the escalating violence, Hamas’s Interior and National Security Ministry announced a “clemency framework.” This initiative allows militia members and criminals not involved in bloodshed to surrender by the following Sunday, with a warning that those who do not comply will face severe punishment.

Amid the turmoil, three anti-Hamas militias publicly expressed their support for President Trump’s peace proposal, rejecting Hamas’s authority in the Gaza Strip.

As the situation develops, Israel has indicated that Hamas is expected to release 20 living hostages to the Red Cross by 5 a.m. Eastern Time (noon in Gaza) on Monday. The hostages are to be transported in six to eight vehicles under Red Cross supervision and handed over to Israeli forces inside Gaza. They will then be driven to southern Israel to reunite with their families.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the Israeli government for further comment.

Source: Original article

Wolf Inspired by ‘Game of Thrones’ Allegedly Revived After 12,500 Years

A Dallas-based company claims to have successfully brought back the extinct dire wolf, a species that last roamed North America 12,500 years ago, using advanced genetic technologies.

A U.S. company has made headlines by claiming to have resurrected an extinct species of wolf known as the dire wolf. This apex predator last roamed the American midcontinent over 12,500 years ago and gained fame through its portrayal in the HBO series “Game of Thrones.” Colossal Biosciences, based in Dallas, asserts that it has successfully created three dire wolves using genome-editing and cloning technologies, marking what it describes as the world’s first successful “de-extincted animal.” However, some experts argue that the company has merely genetically modified existing wolves rather than truly bringing the species back from extinction.

Dire wolves were prevalent during the Ice Age, with the oldest confirmed fossil dating back approximately 250,000 years, discovered in the Black Hills of South Dakota. In “Game of Thrones,” these wolves are depicted as larger and more intelligent than their modern counterparts, exhibiting fierce loyalty to the Stark family, a central noble house in the series.

The three litters produced by Colossal include two adolescent males named Romulus and Remus, along with a female puppy called Khaleesi. The scientists extracted blood cells from a living gray wolf and employed CRISPR technology—short for “clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats”—to genetically modify these cells at 20 different sites. According to Beth Shapiro, Colossal’s chief scientist, these modifications were aimed at replicating traits believed to have helped dire wolves survive in cold climates, such as larger body sizes and longer, fuller, light-colored fur.

Of the 20 genome edits made, 15 correspond to genes found in actual dire wolves. The ancient DNA used for these modifications was sourced from two fossils: a tooth from Sheridan Pit, Ohio, estimated to be around 13,000 years old, and an inner ear bone from American Falls, Idaho, which dates back approximately 72,000 years. The genetic material was then transferred into an egg cell from a domestic dog, and the embryos were implanted into surrogate dogs. After a gestation period of 62 days, the genetically engineered pups were born.

Ben Lamm, CEO of Colossal Biosciences, described this achievement as a significant milestone, emphasizing that it is just the beginning of what the company hopes to accomplish with its de-extinction technology. “It was once said, ‘any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic,’” Lamm stated. “Today, our team gets to unveil some of the magic they are working on and its broader impact on conservation.”

Colossal has previously announced similar initiatives aimed at genetically altering living species to resemble other extinct animals, such as woolly mammoths and dodos. In conjunction with this week’s announcement, the company also revealed the birth of two litters of cloned red wolves, which are critically endangered. This development is seen as evidence of the potential for conservation through de-extinction technology.

Lamm noted that the team had discussions with officials from the Interior Department in late March regarding their projects. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum praised the work on social media, calling it a “thrilling new era of scientific wonder.” However, some scientists have expressed skepticism about the feasibility of restoring extinct species.

Corey Bradshaw, a professor of global ecology at Flinders University in Australia, voiced concerns about the claims made by Colossal. “So yes, they have slightly genetically modified wolves, maybe, and that’s probably the best that you’re going to get,” Bradshaw commented. “And those slight modifications seem to have been derived from retrieved dire wolf material. Does that make it a dire wolf? No. Does it make a slightly modified gray wolf? Yes. And that’s probably about it.”

Colossal Biosciences has stated that the newly created wolves are thriving in a 2,000-acre ecological preserve in Texas, which is certified by the American Humane Society and registered with the USDA. Looking ahead, the company plans to restore the species in secure ecological preserves, potentially on indigenous land, as part of their long-term vision for conservation.

Source: Original article

Vinay Wins Gold at 2025 Para Powerlifting World Championships in Cairo

Indian para powerlifter Vinay has won a gold medal in the 72kg Junior Category at the 2025 World Para Powerlifting Championships in Cairo, showcasing remarkable strength and determination.

Indian para powerlifter Vinay has made headlines by winning the gold medal in the 72kg Junior Category at the 2025 World Para Powerlifting Championships held in Cairo, Egypt. His remarkable performance featured lifts of 137kg, 142kg, and 147kg. Although his final lift of 147kg was ruled invalid, his successful second lift of 142kg secured him the top position in a closely contested event.

Vinay’s victory came after a fierce competition, where he narrowly defeated Poland’s Mikolaj Kociubinski, who managed a lift of 141kg. The bronze medal was awarded to Sebastian F. from Ecuador, who lifted 137kg.

This achievement marks Vinay’s second major international triumph. He previously clinched gold at the 2024 Para Powerlifting World Cup in Sharm-El-Sheikh, Egypt, competing in the 59kg Junior Category with a lift of 120kg.

Hailing from Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, Vinay’s journey to success is a testament to resilience and determination. Born into a modest family, his father works as a daily wager. Vinay’s life took a transformative turn when J.P. Singh, the coach of the Indian Para Powerlifting Team, recognized his potential at a state-level meet. Under Singh’s mentorship, Vinay has developed into a world-class athlete, embodying the spirit of perseverance and excellence.

Vinay’s recent victory not only highlights his individual talent but also brings pride to the nation, inspiring many aspiring athletes in India. His story serves as a reminder of the power of dedication and hard work in overcoming challenges.

As he continues to train and compete, Vinay aims to further his achievements on the international stage, representing India with pride and determination.

Source: Original article

Spice-Infused Cocktails Enhance Indian-American Dining Experience at Sanjh

Acclaimed Indian fine dining destination Sanjh Restaurant & Bar in Texas is launching a bold new cocktail program that blends traditional Indian flavors with modern mixology techniques.

This fall, Sanjh Restaurant & Bar, a celebrated Indian fine dining establishment located in Irving, Texas, is set to redefine cocktail culture with the introduction of an innovative beverage program. Spearheaded by Yangdup Lama, one of Asia’s most influential bartenders, this new initiative aims to elevate the dining experience through a unique blend of traditional Indian ingredients and contemporary mixology.

The name “Sanjh,” which means “evening” in Hindi, encapsulates the restaurant’s mission to provide an immersive dining experience that pays homage to India’s rich culinary heritage. The venue combines ancient traditions with modern artistry, offering story-driven dishes, handcrafted cocktails, and exceptional hospitality.

Yangdup Lama, recently honored as Mixologist of the Year by Travel + Leisure Asia and recognized in Drinks International’s Bar World 100, brings over two decades of expertise to Sanjh. His cocktail menu celebrates the diverse culinary landscape of India while incorporating cutting-edge mixology trends in the United States.

“The goal of this program was to tell India’s story through drinks,” Lama explains. “From street food to savory spices and herbs, every ingredient has a purpose. I’ve always believed anything edible can be used to create a cocktail, and I love using regional ingredients to craft path-breaking drinks that both honor India’s culinary heritage and push the boundaries of modern mixology.”

The new cocktail menu showcases an ingredient-first philosophy, featuring unique components such as moong dal halwa, betel nut, chaat masala, curry leaf, jaggery, and sandalwood. Lama employs advanced techniques, including moong dal fat-washing, spice tinctures, flavored airs, and house-made oleo saccharum, to transform these traditional ingredients into cocktails that feel distinctly modern.

Among the standout offerings are:

Dear Delhi – A rich, aromatic cocktail that combines Black Label whiskey with smoky malt, maple and apple, and a bitter orange aperitif, evoking the essence of historic sites in India.

Kammagani – This cocktail features Buffalo Trace bourbon washed with moong dal halwa, clarified lime, and cardamom, merging dessert flavors with spirits in an innovative way.

Southern Somrus – Inspired by ancient texts, this drink layers brandy with cumin liqueur, jaggery syrup, lime acid, and curry leaf air, creating a savory cocktail experience from Indian pantry staples.

Chowpatti Bhel Puri – A nod to Mumbai’s beloved street food, this cocktail blends Sauza Silver tequila with fresh tomato, chaat masala, tamarind, herbs, and citrus, capturing the vibrant flavors of the city’s evening snacks.

In addition to these unique creations, the cocktail program also features refined classics and a curated selection of zero-proof cocktails. These spirit-free options highlight ingredients like masala chai, rose, pistachio, and homemade kahwa tea. Crafted with the same precision and creativity as their alcoholic counterparts, these drinks cater to the growing demand for mindful drinking and reflect the next generation’s appetite for innovative non-alcoholic beverages.

With this bold new cocktail program, Sanjh Restaurant & Bar is poised to lead a new era of Indian mixology in the U.S., where traditional flavors meet modern techniques, creating a truly unique dining experience.

Source: Original article

Trump’s National Guard Troops Remain in Illinois Amid Judge’s Ruling

Federal judge allows National Guard troops to remain in Illinois but prohibits their deployment for patrol duties amid President Trump’s comments on the Insurrection Act.

A federal judge has ruled that National Guard troops deployed to Illinois by President Donald Trump to address crime can stay in the state. However, they are prohibited from patrolling or protecting federal property.

The ruling came after U.S. District Judge April Perry issued a temporary restraining order on Thursday, blocking the deployment of the National Guard in Chicago and throughout Illinois for at least two weeks. The Trump administration sought an emergency stay following this decision.

In her ruling, Judge Perry stated that there was no evidence to support claims of a “danger of rebellion” in Illinois, despite Trump’s suggestions that he might invoke the Insurrection Act. This act allows the federal government to deploy troops to states that resist federal laws or fail to quell insurrections.

During a press briefing in the Oval Office, Trump remarked, “I’d do it if it was necessary. So far it hasn’t been necessary. But we have an Insurrection Act for a reason.” The Insurrection Act was last invoked in 1992 during the Los Angeles riots.

Judge Perry emphasized that there has been no indication of a failure of civil authority in Illinois. She noted that individuals who have violated the law by attacking federal authorities have been arrested, and the courts remain operational. “Resort to the military to execute the laws is not called for,” she stated.

She further added, “Not even Alexander Hamilton could have envisioned one state’s militia to be used against another state’s residents because the President wants to punish those with views other than his own.”

In her order, Judge Perry clarified that members of the National Guard do not need to return to their home states unless specifically directed by a court. This decision allows the troops to remain in Illinois while further legal arguments are considered.

In addition to Chicago, Trump has also dispatched federal troops to other cities, including Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., and Memphis.

According to Fox News, the situation continues to develop as legal proceedings unfold regarding the deployment of National Guard troops in Illinois.

Source: Original article

María Corina Machado Receives 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for Democracy Advocacy

Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado has been awarded the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for her unwavering commitment to democracy and human rights in Venezuela.

Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado has been honored with the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for her steadfast commitment to promoting democratic rights and advocating for a peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy in Venezuela. The Norwegian Nobel Committee recognized her as a symbol of “civilian courage” and praised her efforts in unifying the opposition and pushing for free elections in a deeply divided political landscape.

At 58, Machado has faced significant personal and professional challenges, including being barred from running in the 2024 presidential election and living in hiding due to safety concerns. Despite these obstacles, she has remained a prominent figure in Venezuela’s pro-democracy movement, earning international recognition for her resilience and dedication.

In her acceptance speech, Machado dedicated the award to the Venezuelan people and acknowledged the support of former U.S. President Donald Trump, who has been a vocal critic of President Nicolás Maduro’s regime. The Nobel Peace Prize ceremony is scheduled for December 10, 2025, in Oslo, Norway.

Machado’s journey has been marked by her relentless pursuit of democratic ideals in a country plagued by political turmoil and economic instability. Her leadership has inspired many within Venezuela and abroad, as she continues to advocate for human rights and democratic governance.

As the political situation in Venezuela remains precarious, Machado’s recognition by the Nobel Committee serves as a significant endorsement of her efforts and the broader struggle for democracy in the region. Her work highlights the importance of civic engagement and the role of leaders who are willing to stand up against authoritarianism.

Machado’s dedication to her cause has not gone unnoticed, and her award is seen as a beacon of hope for those who continue to fight for a democratic future in Venezuela. The international community’s support for her efforts underscores the global significance of her work.

As the date of the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony approaches, anticipation builds around Machado’s message and the impact it may have on the ongoing struggle for democracy in Venezuela. Her recognition is not only a personal achievement but also a testament to the resilience of the Venezuelan people in their quest for freedom and justice.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Community Celebrates Gandhi’s Birthday with Generosity and Tradition

On October 2, Mahatma Gandhi’s birth anniversary, a summit highlighted the philanthropic contributions of Indian Americans and their impact on society.

On October 2, the birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi, a summit focused on the philanthropic contributions of Indian Americans was hosted by Indiaspora and the Indian Philanthropy Association (IPA). The event provided valuable insights into the charitable inclinations and social impact of this community.

Indian Americans have made significant contributions to various sectors, with over $3 billion donated to American universities. Additionally, Indian students contribute approximately $10 billion annually to the U.S. economy. Notably, 78% of Indian Americans hold a Bachelor’s degree or higher, and they represent 10% of all doctors in the United States. Furthermore, Indian Americans account for 6% of tax contributions and own 10% of all patents. In the hospitality industry, they own 60% of hotel rooms, and in educational competitions, they have a strong presence, with 28 out of 34 participants in spelling bees being Indian Americans.

The summit sparked a lively discussion among delegates regarding the concept of ‘overheads’ in nonprofit organizations. Questions arose about whether CEOs should use private planes to address poverty and whether it is fair to judge nonprofits solely by their overhead ratios. The consensus emphasized the importance of passion for the cause over strict adherence to efficiency metrics. Minoo Gupta, Vice Chair of IPA, stated, “Efficiency is important, but overheads are the necessary backbone—you need systems and resources to make those programs run efficiently and with integrity.”

Nagma Mullah, CEO of the EdelGive Foundation, added another perspective, arguing that “accounting overhead captures inputs, not outcomes. Efficiency is not necessarily effectiveness.”

Research conducted by Dalberg, a global consulting firm, revealed that the philanthropic efforts of Indian Americans have tripled since 2017. Not only has the amount of money donated increased, but the percentage of their overall income allocated to philanthropy has also risen. Much of this giving is directed towards improving conditions in India, focusing on initiatives such as clean water access, food distribution, education, and job creation in rural areas. Interestingly, many attendees noted that they had not contributed to philanthropic efforts simply because they had never been asked.

Manu Chopra, founder of Karya, which provides digital employment opportunities to economically disadvantaged Indians, shared his personal journey. Growing up in the Shakurbasti area of Delhi, he credited sponsorships for his education, which ultimately led him to Stanford. To give back, Chopra established work opportunities in India for high-talent, low-opportunity communities, training candidates to work with companies like DeepMind and Microsoft Research, which offer wages significantly above the minimum wage. One of his standout candidates, a woman in her 50s, earned $800 in her first 20 hours at Karya.

Raju Reddy, founder of Sierra Atlantis, which has since been acquired by Hitachi, discussed his initiative, Kakatiya Sandbox, in rural Telangana, India. This initiative aims to create a sustainable ecosystem for long-term social impact. Reddy emphasized the importance of combining an entrepreneurial mindset with compassion to effectively address social challenges.

Desh Deshpande provided a thought-provoking conclusion to the summit by posing the question, “What would Gandhi do if he were alive today?” He reflected on the state of the world since 1948, noting that while some statistics may appear promising, Gandhi would likely be concerned about the growing wealth divide and the prevalence of violence and polarization. Deshpande suggested that Gandhi would advocate for a more compassionate approach to philanthropy, focusing on systemic change rather than creating dependency. He emphasized that Gandhi was not anti-technology but rather pro-human.

A recurring theme throughout the summit was the importance of keeping the beneficiaries in mind while planning philanthropic solutions. The central question remains: who are we ultimately serving?

Source: Original article

Democrats Fundraise During Government Shutdown, Hakeem Jeffries Urges Supporters

As the government shutdown enters its third week, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and other Democrats are leveraging the situation for fundraising while criticizing Republicans and former President Donald Trump.

The government shutdown has now stretched into its third week, causing concern as service members and federal workers prepare to miss paychecks. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., along with other Democrats, has been vocal in attributing the crisis to Republicans and former President Donald Trump.

In a recent fundraising email, Jeffries reiterated his commitment to the party’s demands for reopening the government, signing off with his familiar slogan, “keep the faith.” He emphasized that Democrats would not waver in their stance, stating, “Democrats will continue to stand up to address the Republican healthcare crisis, and we will NOT back down until it’s fixed. America deserves better.”

While discussions have been ongoing in the Senate behind closed doors, no substantial negotiations have emerged regarding expiring Obamacare tax credits that could provide a solution to end the shutdown. Jeffries’ comments suggest that Democrats remain steadfast in their position.

“Republicans thought we’d back down because of their deepfake videos, threats, and lies,” Jeffries wrote. “Not a chance. Cancel the Cuts. Lower the Cost. Save Healthcare. Keep the faith.”

Other House Democrats are also actively fundraising amid the shutdown. Representative Janelle Bynum, D-Ore., has sent multiple fundraising emails, one of which stated, “The stakes couldn’t be higher.” Her team highlighted her commitment to prioritizing Oregonians and ensuring that the government serves the people. “If you’re with her, pitch in today to help her keep up this critical fight for hardworking Americans in the House,” they urged.

In another email, Bynum expressed frustration over an attack ad from Republicans blaming her for the shutdown. “They’re targeting me for their failed leadership and the chaos they’ve created in Washington. We can’t allow their shameful attacks to go unanswered,” she wrote, encouraging supporters to donate to counter the Republican narrative.

Representative Dave Min, D-Calif., also reached out to supporters, emphasizing the need to regain control of Congress to prevent future shutdowns. “If you’re in a position to give, will you chip in whatever you can to help me defend this toss-up district next year?” he asked, outlining the Democrats’ demands for reversing GOP Medicaid cuts and extending Obamacare tax credits to make health insurance more affordable.

Representative Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, took a direct approach in her fundraising efforts, asking supporters to “chip in $10, $25, or whatever makes sense for you to stand with me against this reckless shutdown and help us take back the House next fall.”

Speaking to reporters on Friday, Jeffries reiterated his opposition to the GOP’s continuing resolution spending bill, labeling it a “partisan spending bill that continues to gut the healthcare of the American people and threatens to raise the costs of living on tens of millions of people.”

Fox News Digital reached out to the offices of Jeffries, Bynum, Min, and Kaptur for comments but did not receive an immediate response.

Source: Original article

Meta’s Subsea Cable Project Chooses Mumbai and Vizag as Landing Sites

Meta has selected Mumbai and Visakhapatnam as landing sites for its ambitious subsea cable project, enhancing India’s role in global digital infrastructure.

Meta has announced that it will establish landing sites for its multibillion-dollar subsea cable, Project Waterworth, in the Indian port cities of Mumbai and Visakhapatnam (Vizag). This decision highlights India’s increasing strategic importance in the global digital landscape.

To facilitate this initiative, Meta has partnered with Sify Technologies under a $5 million contract. The selection of these two cities as landing points for the 50,000-kilometer cable, which will connect five continents, reinforces India’s position as a vital communications hub. The project aims to enhance capacity, connectivity, and resilience across the region.

Mumbai, already recognized as a major telecom and data center hub, is expected to experience reduced latency and increased bandwidth as a result of this project. This development will further solidify Mumbai’s leadership in India’s digital economy.

On the other hand, Vizag’s designation as a landing site could stimulate greater connectivity and investment along India’s eastern coastline. This move may extend technological advancements beyond the traditional western and southern hubs, fostering local digital ecosystems and attracting tech firms looking for robust backhaul capabilities.

Earlier this year, Meta unveiled Project Waterworth, an ambitious subsea cable initiative designed to transform global internet infrastructure. Spanning approximately 50,000 kilometers, it is set to become one of the world’s longest undersea cable systems, linking North America, South America, Africa, Asia, and Europe.

Key landing points for Project Waterworth include the United States, Brazil, India, South Africa, and several others, with a focus on enhancing internet connectivity and bandwidth in both developed and underserved regions.

The project features 24 fiber pairs, significantly increasing its capacity compared to most existing subsea cables. This enhancement is crucial for meeting Meta’s growing data demands, driven by advancements in artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and cloud services. The initiative aims to provide faster, more resilient internet infrastructure, ensuring that Meta’s platforms—including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and future AI-driven services—can scale globally with low latency and high reliability.

The engineering behind Project Waterworth is also noteworthy. The cable will traverse deep-sea regions, reaching depths of up to 7,000 meters, and will be heavily protected near shorelines and high-risk areas to minimize the risk of faults caused by fishing activities or natural disasters. This represents a significant multibillion-dollar investment in infrastructure that aims not only at commercial use but also at promoting digital inclusion and bridging connectivity gaps in regions that still lack robust internet access.

Despite the ambitious scope of Project Waterworth, challenges remain. While Meta has not provided a specific completion date, the project is anticipated to take several years and may encounter geopolitical, regulatory, and environmental hurdles.

Nonetheless, Project Waterworth signifies Meta’s long-term commitment to controlling more of the global internet backbone. This trend among tech giants investing directly in physical infrastructure reflects a growing recognition of the importance of such investments in supporting expanding digital ecosystems.

The choice of two distinct landing sites in India—Mumbai on the west coast and Visakhapatnam on the east—indicates Meta’s strategy to build redundancy and geographic diversity into its connectivity infrastructure. This dual-coast approach could enhance national network resilience and provide more balanced internet access across India, potentially alleviating pressure on traditionally overburdened landing stations like those in Mumbai and Chennai.

While the full commercial and policy implications of this development are yet to be determined, it positions India as a critical transit hub in the evolving global internet backbone. With the increasing demand for AI processing, cloud services, and data localization, such infrastructure investments are becoming essential for digital sovereignty and economic competitiveness.

If supported effectively by local partnerships and regulatory frameworks, Project Waterworth could bolster India’s long-term digital ambitions, positioning the country not just as a major consumer of data but also as a key player in global infrastructure.

Source: Original article

State Bans Products Containing Dangerous Substance Due to Kid Overuse Fears

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine has enacted an executive order banning THC products, mandating their removal from retailers by October 14 amid rising concerns over their use by children.

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine has signed an executive order prohibiting the sale of intoxicating hemp products, which include THC-containing beverages, gummies, and other edibles. Retailers across the state are required to remove these products from their shelves by October 14.

In a press release, DeWine emphasized the potential dangers of these products, particularly for young, developing brains. “Intoxicating hemp products are known to have significant impacts on young, developing brains, yet these products are legally marketed to kids, sold to kids, and ingested by kids in Ohio,” he stated.

The concern surrounding these products is underscored by their marketing tactics, which often feature colorful packaging that mimics popular candy brands. Research from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) indicates that exposure to THC during adolescence can lead to detrimental effects on learning, memory, and attention, as well as alterations in brain development.

Intoxicating hemp products are created by manipulating compounds found in hemp plants, resulting in substances such as delta-8-THC and delta-9-THC. Data from Ohio Poison Control (OPC) reveals a troubling increase in exposures to these compounds among individuals aged 19 and younger, rising from 419 cases in 2021 to 994 in 2024. Among children aged five and under, the number of exposures nearly tripled during the same period, escalating from 202 to 555.

Alarmingly, about 90% of children aged 12 and under who were exposed to THC required emergency medical attention, with two-thirds of those cases resulting in hospitalization, according to OPC statistics.

Dr. Marc Siegel, a senior medical analyst for Fox News, highlighted the issue of unregulated cannabis products as a significant factor contributing to this problem. “The 2018 Farm Bill opens up a Pandora’s box, where hemp products are used to justify unregulated use of THC gummies, drinks, and intoxicating hemp products,” he stated.

The 2018 Farm Bill, officially known as the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, legalized industrial hemp at the federal level, leading to a surge in the availability of hemp-derived products.

Governor DeWine acknowledged that the ban is a temporary measure but deemed it necessary given the associated risks. He pointed out that when Ohioans voted to legalize marijuana, they did so with the understanding that it would be regulated for individuals aged 21 and older. “Intoxicating hemp completely bypasses these laws, and we must do more to keep these products away from kids,” he said.

Under the new order, any THC-containing products must either be returned to the manufacturer or surrendered to law enforcement. Retailers who fail to comply with the order could face fines of $500 per day for continued sales of these products. Additionally, the Ohio Department of Agriculture has been granted the authority to confiscate any non-compliant items.

As concerns about the safety of intoxicating hemp products continue to grow, this executive order marks a significant step by Ohio officials to protect children from potential harm.

Source: Original article

Visa Restrictions Under Trump Administration Result in 19% Decline in International Students

In August 2025, the U.S. saw a 19% drop in international student arrivals, largely due to visa restrictions enacted during the Trump administration.

In August 2025, the United States experienced a notable decline of 19% in international student arrivals compared to the same month in 2024. This downturn is largely attributed to a series of stringent measures implemented by the Trump administration.

Among these measures were the suspension of student visa interviews and the introduction of a travel ban affecting 19 countries, primarily located in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. This has had a particularly significant impact on India, which has historically been the largest source of international students to the U.S. The country saw a staggering 45% decrease in student arrivals.

The new vetting procedures introduced during this period require applicants to provide access to their social media accounts, further complicating the visa application process. These developments have led many prospective students to reconsider their options for studying abroad, with some choosing alternative destinations such as Germany and the United Kingdom instead.

The decline in international student numbers poses a financial challenge for U.S. universities, many of which rely heavily on tuition fees from foreign students. Experts warn that if this trend continues, it could undermine the global standing of American higher education institutions.

As the landscape of international education shifts, the long-term implications of these visa restrictions remain to be seen. Universities may need to adapt their recruitment strategies to counteract the effects of these policies and attract students from abroad.

According to Global Net News, the ramifications of these changes could extend beyond immediate enrollment figures, potentially affecting the diversity and global engagement of U.S. campuses.

Source: Original article

ChatGPT Image Aids Arrest in Pacific Palisades Fire Investigation

A 29-year-old man has been arrested in connection with the Pacific Palisades fire, which resulted in 12 fatalities and the destruction of over 6,000 homes in January.

A 29-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of starting the devastating Pacific Palisades fire in Los Angeles, which claimed 12 lives and destroyed more than 6,000 homes in January. The suspect, Jonathan Rinderknecht, was apprehended in Florida, with evidence from his digital devices linking him to the fire, including an image he generated using ChatGPT that depicted a burning city, according to officials from the Justice Department.

The Pacific Palisades fire ravaged over 23,000 acres and caused approximately $150 billion in damages. The blaze, which lasted for more than three weeks, obliterated entire neighborhoods and severely impacted areas of Topanga and Malibu.

Rinderknecht has been charged with destruction of property, and Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli expressed hope that the arrest would provide some measure of justice to those affected by the disaster. Additional charges, including murder, may be forthcoming as the investigation continues.

After the fire, Rinderknecht relocated to Florida, having previously lived and worked in California. He is scheduled to appear in the U.S. District Court in Orlando for a bond hearing on Thursday. However, he is not expected to enter an official plea until his arraignment hearing in Los Angeles, which is set to take place in the coming weeks.

According to the indictment, Rinderknecht ignited a fire known as the Lachman Fire on New Year’s Day. He allegedly used an open flame to start the fire after completing a ride as an Uber driver on New Year’s Eve. Although firefighters quickly suppressed the initial flames, the fire smoldered underground in the dense vegetation before reigniting during a windstorm.

Authorities have uncovered links between Rinderknecht and the fire through his phone records, which include videos he recorded of firefighters attempting to extinguish the flames. His phone activity revealed that he made multiple attempts to call 911 just after midnight on New Year’s Day, but was unable to connect due to poor mobile reception in the area. Investigators found a screen recording of him trying to reach emergency services, during which he was eventually connected to a dispatcher.

In a concerning inquiry, Rinderknecht asked ChatGPT whether a person could be held responsible if a fire was caused by their cigarettes. Investigators believe this question was an attempt to fabricate evidence suggesting a more innocent cause for the fire.

Furthermore, five months prior to the fire, Rinderknecht had requested ChatGPT to create an image of a “dystopian painting” featuring a burning forest and a crowd fleeing from the flames, raising further suspicions about his intentions.

California Governor Gavin Newsom commented on the arrest, calling it a significant step toward providing closure for the thousands of Californians whose lives were disrupted by the fire. He also noted that the state is cooperating with the federal investigation into the incident.

Source: Original article

Tirlok Malik Celebrates Indian-American Culture at New York Diwali Festivals

Emmy-nominated filmmaker Tirlok Malik will portray Bharat at two major Diwali celebrations in New York, showcasing the timeless values of the Ramayana.

Emmy-nominated filmmaker, actor, and Happy Life Yoga speaker Tirlok Malik is set to captivate audiences this Diwali season by once again embodying Bharat in two of New York’s premier celebrations: the AIA Diwali Festival at Overlook Beach, Long Island, and the Times Square Diwali Festival.

Malik has a long-standing tradition of portraying Bharat under the mentorship of Pandit S.N. Charkha, the founder of the East-West School of Dance and a disciple of the esteemed Padma Vibhushan Pandit Birju Maharaj. His impressive track record includes seven consecutive years performing at the Museum of Metropolitan Art’s annual Diwali events in New York, where he has consistently drawn full houses. “Pandit Charkha ji has devoted his life to dance and the arts. Being under his guidance is a true blessing,” Malik reflects. “When I play Bharat, especially during Lord Rama’s coronation, I feel fully immersed, almost in a trance.”

For Malik, the character of Bharat—the devoted brother of Lord Rama from the epic Ramayana—represents ideals of love, respect, devotion, and sacrifice. “Portraying Bharat is more than acting; it is stepping into timeless values that resonate today,” he explains, emphasizing the depth of his connection to the role.

The AIA Diwali Festival, now in its 38th year, is the oldest and most renowned celebration of its kind in the United States. This year, the festival is led by President Bina Kothari and National President Gobind Munjal. The event at Overlook Beach will feature fireworks, music, and a grand dance drama directed by Pandit Charkha, with Malik taking center stage as Bharat.

The festivities continue with the Times Square Diwali Festival, which is celebrating its 10th anniversary. Created and led by Neeta Bhasin, this festival has successfully brought the spirit of Diwali to a global audience in the heart of New York City. Malik acknowledges Bhasin’s remarkable achievement, stating, “Neeta Bhasin ji has accomplished something extraordinary, making Diwali a part of the world’s most iconic square. Performing the Ramayana in Times Square is historic and sends a powerful message about the universal relevance of our traditions.”

For Malik, these performances transcend mere entertainment; they serve as a medium for sharing the enduring lessons of the Ramayana with American audiences. “In today’s world, the values depicted in the Ramayana are needed more than ever. By bringing these stories to New York, we celebrate Diwali while reminding ourselves and future generations of values that uphold humanity,” he asserts.

Source: Original article

Three U.S. Scientists with UC Ties Awarded 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics

Three U.S. scientists affiliated with the University of California have been awarded the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics for their groundbreaking work in quantum physics on a chip.

SAN FRANCISCO, CA — Three U.S. scientists with strong connections to the University of California have been awarded the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics. Their groundbreaking experiments demonstrated the principles of quantum physics on a chip, a significant advancement that could pave the way for the next generation of quantum technologies, including computers, sensors, and cryptography. The laureates will share a prize of 11 million Swedish kronor.

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences recognized their contributions “for the discovery of macroscopic quantum mechanical tunneling and energy quantization in an electric circuit.” Their innovative work revealed that quantum effects, which are usually only observable at microscopic scales, can manifest in systems large enough to be held in the hand.

Olle Eriksson, Chair of the Nobel Committee for Physics, expressed enthusiasm for the recognition, stating, “It is wonderful to celebrate the way century-old quantum mechanics continually offers new surprises. It is also enormously useful, as quantum mechanics is the foundation of all digital technology.”

UC President James Milliken praised the achievement as a significant milestone for the university system. He noted that the laureates—John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret, and John M. Martinis—join a “long line” of UC faculty Nobel laureates, which includes 23 previous winners in the field of physics. “These awards are not only great honors,” he remarked, “they are tangible evidence of the work happening across the University of California every day to expand knowledge, test the boundaries of science, and conduct research that improves our lives.”

The connections of the laureates to the University of California are noteworthy. John Clarke, 83, earned his Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge and is an emeritus professor at UC Berkeley. Michel H. Devoret, 72, received his doctorate from Paris-Sud University and currently teaches at both Yale University and UC Santa Barbara. John M. Martinis, 67, completed his Ph.D. at UC Berkeley and is also an emeritus professor at UC Santa Barbara.

This recognition not only highlights the individual achievements of the scientists but also underscores the University of California’s ongoing contributions to the field of physics and its commitment to advancing scientific research.

Source: Original article

US Soldiers in Urban Areas Increase Safety Concerns, Says Candidate

New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill criticized President Trump’s National Guard deployments, asserting that military presence in cities makes people feel less safe.

New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Rep. Mikie Sherrill has voiced strong opposition to President Donald Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to American cities, claiming that the presence of troops on the streets “makes people less safe.” During a gubernatorial debate on Wednesday night against Republican candidate Jack Ciattarelli, Sherrill emphasized her belief that “military members should not be on our streets.”

Sherrill articulated her concerns, stating, “It makes people less safe, it makes people feel less safe.” When asked how she would respond if Trump were to send the National Guard to a city in New Jersey, she clarified her stance. “Unless there is an insurrection or some sort of crisis where the National Guard could come in and the president invokes the Insurrection Act, he’s moving these National Guard troops across the country illegally against the Insurrection Act, against posse comitatus,” she said.

In her remarks, Sherrill reiterated her position that military personnel should not be deployed in civilian areas. “I can tell you this, because I’ve both worked at the U.S. Attorney’s office with law enforcement to keep people safe, and I’ve also worked in the military, and those are two very different jobs,” she explained. She expressed her disapproval of Trump’s comments regarding using U.S. cities as training grounds for the military, calling such a notion “unacceptable.” Sherrill stated, “I will not stand for that as governor.”

On the other side of the debate, Ciattarelli challenged Sherrill’s record on public safety. He accused her of being weak on safety issues, stating, “The congresswoman has been anything but strong when it comes to public safety.” He pointed out her vote to eliminate qualified immunity, which he described as a fundamental protection for local law enforcement. Ciattarelli also criticized her consideration of reappointing the current attorney general, whom he labeled as the most anti-police attorney general New Jersey has ever had.

Ciattarelli assured the audience that, as governor, he would prioritize safety, declaring, “I’ve told the president, and the people of New Jersey, that he will never have to worry about New Jersey because as governor, we’ll have safe communities.” He emphasized his commitment to restoring law and order in the state, stating, “We will be a law-and-order state again, and there will be a consequence for unruly, unlawful behavior.”

As the gubernatorial race heats up, the contrasting views on public safety and military presence in urban areas are likely to remain central themes in the campaign.

Source: Original article

Scientists Anticipate Underwater Volcano Eruption Off Oregon Coast

An underwater volcano, Axial Seamount, located 300 miles off the Oregon coast, is showing signs of a potential eruption, though experts assure it poses no threat to land or seismic activity.

Scientists have indicated that the Axial Seamount, an underwater volcano situated 300 miles off the coast of Oregon, may erupt later this year. This volcano, which lies over 4,900 feet beneath the surface of the Pacific Ocean, has not erupted since 2015, but recent observations suggest that it could be on the verge of an eruption.

The Axial Seamount is formed by a geological phenomenon known as a hot spot. This occurs when hot plumes of molten material rise from the Earth’s mantle into the crust. According to the University of Washington’s College of the Environment, as the tectonic plates move over the stationary hot spot, long chains of volcanoes are created over time.

“Over two-thirds of the Earth’s surface was formed by volcanic eruptions at these mid-ocean ridges,” said Maya Tolstoy, a marine geophysicist and dean of the university’s College of the Environment. “Axial Seamount is a direct result of these fundamental processes that continue to shape our planet today.”

Despite the potential for an eruption, scientists have reassured the public that there is no immediate danger. “Axial Seamount is much too deep and far from shore for people on land to even notice when it erupts,” the university’s blog post stated. “An eruption at Axial Seamount also has nothing to do with seismic activity on land, so Pacific Northwesterners don’t need to worry about this event triggering a major earthquake or tsunami.”

The first indication of an impending eruption will likely be a significant increase in seismic activity around the volcano. Deborah Kelley, a professor at the University of Washington’s School of Oceanography and director of the Regional Cabled Array, noted that the volcano has already surpassed the inflation levels observed in 2015. Currently, the earthquake activity remains relatively low, with reports of 200 to 300 earthquakes occurring daily, and occasional spikes reaching around 1,000 due to tidal influences.

“If what we learned in 2015 is correct, I would expect to see more than 2,000 earthquakes per day for a few months before the eruption,” Kelley explained. The increased seismic activity is attributed to magma moving closer to the surface.

William Wilcock, also a professor at the UW School of Oceanography, elaborated on the eruption process. “That period lasts about an hour, and then the magma reaches the surface,” he said. “Lava flows spread across the caldera, and lava-filled fissures open up to the north or the south, reaching as far as 40 kilometers (about 25 miles).” He added that while the seismic activity tends to decrease shortly after the eruption begins, the eruption itself may continue at a slow pace for approximately a month.

In summary, while the Axial Seamount shows signs of a potential eruption, experts maintain that it poses no threat to coastal communities or seismic stability in the region. The ongoing monitoring of the volcano will provide further insights into its activity and any necessary precautions.

Source: Original article

She Aided North Korea in Infiltrating U.S. Tech Firms

Christina Chapman operated a covert hub from her Arizona home, facilitating North Korean operatives’ infiltration of U.S. companies, resulting in over $17 million in stolen salaries.

In a quiet neighborhood of Litchfield Park, Arizona, Christina Chapman, 50, ran a covert operation that enabled North Korean operatives to infiltrate American firms, amassing a staggering $17 million in stolen salaries.

This scenario is not a plot from a new Netflix series; it is a real-life case that unfolded just a short drive from Phoenix. Chapman appeared to be an ordinary suburban woman, but her home served as a secret cyber operations center aimed at assisting North Korean IT workers in acquiring equipment and tools for their military.

Due to international sanctions, North Korean workers cannot legally apply for jobs at major American companies like Google, Amazon, or Meta. Instead, they resort to stealing the identities of real Americans, including names, birth dates, and Social Security numbers. Using this stolen information, they impersonate remote IT workers, slipping into U.S. companies unnoticed.

However, when these companies send out laptops and phones to their new “remote hires,” the devices cannot be shipped to North Korea. Over three years, Chapman transformed her suburban residence into a covert hub for North Korea’s elite cybercriminals, receiving more than 100 laptops and smartphones from various U.S. companies.

These were not just any companies; they included major American banks, top-tier tech firms, and at least one U.S. government contractor, all of which believed they were hiring legitimate remote workers. Unbeknownst to them, they were onboarding North Korean operatives.

Upon receiving the equipment, Chapman connected the devices to virtual private networks (VPNs) and remote desktop tools like AnyDesk and Chrome Remote Desktop. She even employed voice-changing software to create the illusion that the North Koreans were logging in from within the United States.

Chapman also shipped 49 laptops and other devices supplied by U.S. companies to overseas locations, including multiple shipments to a city in China bordering North Korea. These fake employees participated in daily activities, submitting code, answering emails, and attending meetings, all while actually operating from halfway around the world. In reality, they were siphoning U.S. technology and cash directly into Kim Jong Un’s regime.

When human resources teams requested video verification, Chapman did not hesitate. She appeared on camera herself, sometimes in costume, impersonating the individuals listed on the resumes. She managed the entire operation like a talent agency for cybercriminals, staging fake job interviews, coaching operatives on their responses, and laundering their salaries through U.S. banks.

Chapman reportedly took home at least $800,000 in “service fees,” while the total amount stolen for North Korea exceeded $17 million, according to the FBI, which labeled the scheme a national security threat. Chapman referred to her actions as “helping her friends.”

Eventually, the elaborate scheme began to unravel. Investigators detected unusual patterns, such as numerous remote hires all linked to the same Arizona address and company systems being accessed from countries the workers had never visited.

Chapman was arrested and sentenced in July 2025 to 102 months in federal prison. The most astonishing aspect of this case? She orchestrated the entire operation from her living room, exemplifying a new era of remote work.

Source: Original article

H-1B Fees Impact Universities: 25 Schools Face Financial Risks

The implementation of a $100,000 fee for new H-1B visas could significantly impact universities, prompting advisories and concerns about the future of international faculty recruitment.

The recent announcement of a $100,000 fee for new H-1B visas is poised to create challenges for universities across the United States. While the fee is not scheduled to take effect until March 2026, coinciding with the annual lottery for approximately 85,000 new H-1B visas, its implications are already being felt in academic institutions.

Jeremy Neufeld, director of immigration policy at the nonpartisan Institute for Progress, emphasizes that universities may be among the first to experience the fallout from this policy. Unlike private companies, universities and certain nonprofit organizations are currently exempt from the lottery system, allowing them to apply for H-1B visas year-round. However, they are not exempt from the new fee, which represents a significant financial burden. “The universities are on the frontlines and this is just a pure tax on their pipeline,” Neufeld stated.

Previously, H-1B fees ranged from $2,000 to $5,000, depending on the size of the employer, according to the American Immigration Council. The steep increase to $100,000 raises concerns about the ability of universities to attract and retain international talent, particularly as the Trump administration’s recent measures also propose changes to the visa lottery system that would favor older, higher-paid workers. This shift could hinder the prospects of international students earning advanced degrees in the U.S., who traditionally have relied on H-1B visas to remain in the country after graduation.

In response to the uncertainty surrounding the new visa rules, the University of Southern California (USC) has issued a travel advisory for faculty and staff on H-1B visas. The advisory recommends postponing international travel until further guidance is provided. The university’s student newspaper reported that faculty currently abroad are encouraged to return to the United States before the new regulations take effect.

“Out of an abundance of caution, all faculty and staff in H-1B status currently in the U.S. should put international travel plans on hold until they receive further guidance,” the advisory stated. “If possible, any faculty and staff in H-1B status who are currently outside the U.S. are strongly recommended to return to the U.S. before the proclamation takes effect.”

Aisling Kelliher, an associate professor in cinematic arts at USC, highlighted the importance of the American education system’s international reputation. “It’s a huge opportunity, both to come here as an immigrant and to receive an education, and then also to be able to continue as a researcher and as a teacher within the system that you’ve learned from,” she remarked.

The impact of the Trump administration’s policies on foreign student enrollment is already evident. Data from the U.S. International Trade Administration indicates that international student arrivals (excluding those from Canada and Mexico) decreased by 19% in August 2025 compared to the previous year, totaling 307,419. Similarly, July arrivals fell by 28% to 76,519. Forbes immigration senior contributor Stuart Anderson noted that some of this decline may be attributed to already enrolled students opting not to return home for the summer, as many universities advised them to remain in the U.S. to avoid potential reentry issues.

According to data from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the 25 universities that received the most H-1B visas in the first nine months of Fiscal Year 2025 included Stanford University, which granted 500 visas during this period. Notably, 36% of its graduate students are international. Washington University in St. Louis and Columbia University in New York City reported that nearly half of their graduate students (46%) are from abroad.

In light of the new fee, a lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California challenging the $100,000 charge. The plaintiffs include the American Association of University Professors, unions representing graduate students and medical residents, a church and its pastor, the recruiting firm Global Nurse Force, and an Indian postdoctoral researcher who lost her H-1B sponsorship due to the fee.

The lawsuit argues that the fee disproportionately affects workers already in the U.S. on other visas, such as F-1 student visas, who are seeking to transition to H-1B status. Even if the courts ultimately block the fee or grant exemptions for universities and nonprofits, the broader implications of the H-1B measures could still deter international faculty recruitment.

Additionally, proposed changes to student visas may restrict some graduate students from pursuing postdoctoral positions in the U.S. through Optional Practical Training (OPT). This program allows STEM graduates from abroad to work for up to three years, helping them build professional networks and transition into H-1B roles sponsored by universities or private employers.

The evolving landscape of immigration policy continues to raise concerns among academic institutions, as they navigate the challenges posed by new fees and regulations that could significantly alter the recruitment of international talent.

Source: Original article

Rare Neck Condition Raises Stroke Risk During Salon Hair Washing

Salon hair washing can pose a rare risk of stroke due to a condition known as beauty parlor stroke syndrome, which can occur from improper neck positioning during the process.

For many, a trip to the salon for a shampoo is a moment of indulgence and relaxation. However, for a small number of individuals, this seemingly harmless act can trigger a serious condition known as beauty parlor stroke syndrome (BPSS).

BPSS is characterized by stroke-like events that can occur when the neck is hyperextended or rotated during hair washing or similar activities. This positioning can lead to compression or even tearing of the vertebral arteries located in the neck.

The term “beauty parlor stroke syndrome” was first popularized in 1993 by New York neurologist Michael Weintraub, who documented five cases of patients experiencing symptoms after salon shampoo treatments. A recent review published in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine has identified 54 documented cases of BPSS over nearly five decades, compiled from 22 different studies. Among these cases, 42 originated in beauty salons, while eight occurred in dental settings, and four were reported in other contexts.

Notably, approximately 80% of those affected by BPSS are women, with ages ranging from teenagers to seniors. A 2018 review published in the Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine explains that BPSS occurs when the neck is held in an extreme backward or twisted position during a wash or treatment. This can stretch or compress the vertebral arteries that run along the spine to the brain.

In rare instances, such positioning can cause a tear in the artery wall, known as a dissection. This dissection may lead to the formation of a clot, which can obstruct blood flow to the brain. The same review also highlights that even minor structural issues, such as bone spurs (osteophytes) in the cervical vertebrae, can exacerbate compression and increase the risk of BPSS. Consequently, a simple tilt of the head can temporarily restrict blood supply to critical areas of the brain stem and cerebellum.

Symptoms of BPSS typically manifest during or within several days following the triggering posture. Common warning signs include dizziness, vertigo, neck pain, and visual disturbances. In more severe cases, individuals may experience weakness, numbness, or difficulties with speech.

Diagnosis of BPSS usually involves MRI or CT angiography to confirm the presence of arterial dissection. Treatment often mirrors that of other types of strokes, with doctors prescribing antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications. In some cases, vascular stenting or surgery may be necessary, according to medical experts.

Health researchers associated with the American Council on Science and Health in New York City emphasize that BPSS is exceedingly rare and primarily recognized through isolated case reports rather than extensive population data.

Despite its rarity, the Pro Beauty Association in Arizona recommends that stylists take precautions by providing neck support, such as rolled towels or cushions, and allowing clients to maintain a more upright position during washes. Experts also advise clients to communicate immediately if they experience any neck strain or dizziness during the process.

As awareness of beauty parlor stroke syndrome grows, both salon professionals and clients are encouraged to prioritize safety to ensure that hair washing remains a relaxing experience.

Source: Original article

Axel, DACA Recipient, Works to Safeguard His Community

Axel Herrera, a DACA recipient in North Carolina, faces uncertainty as local police checkpoints increase, impacting his community and prompting him to pursue further education at Yale.

Since the election of President Trump, Axel Herrera has witnessed a troubling rise in local police traffic checkpoints throughout his North Carolina community. As a DACA recipient, Axel enjoys legal protection from deportation, yet he has seen friends and family members detained or deported following random traffic stops. This has left many undocumented individuals in his community living in a state of constant fear. “It’s creating a hostile environment,” Axel states. “It’s pretty clear what the government is trying to do.”

At 27 years old, Axel has lived in North Carolina since he was seven, when his family fled Honduras in search of a better life. Achieving DACA status felt like the realization of his family’s dreams. He earned a scholarship to Duke University, becoming the first in his family to attend college, and graduated with multiple awards, including a prestigious Congressional internship.

Following his graduation, Axel took on the role of civic engagement director for Mi Familia en Acción, a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting Hispanic communities. Over the past few years, he has focused on registering citizens to vote, creating youth programs, and mentoring immigrants as they pursue educational and professional opportunities. “All I ever wanted was to belong, and to give something back,” he reflects.

However, the current political climate has posed significant challenges. Ongoing legal battles surrounding DACA’s validity threaten Axel’s protection from deportation. He must renew his DACA status and employment authorization every two years. Although he was able to process his paperwork just before Trump took office, he remains uncertain about the future of his status when it expires in 2026. He is aware that some Dreamers are struggling to get their applications processed, and the Trump administration has already deported at least one DACA recipient under the claim of an outstanding deportation order. “Right now, everything is up in the air,” Axel admits. “I’m very concerned about the future.”

One potential outcome is that courts may uphold DACA but revoke the work authorization for its recipients. Due to this uncertainty, Axel has decided to leave his hard-earned job and return to school. This fall, he will relocate to Yale, where he has secured a scholarship to study business and public policy. “It’s a great opportunity, but also a hedge against losing my status,” he explains. “If I lose my work authorization, then being a student might buy me some time and let me find a different path forward.”

Despite his current protections, Axel feels conflicted about leaving his community. Many of his friends and neighbors are constantly communicating via WhatsApp, assessing police conditions whenever they leave their homes. He knows numerous young Venezuelans whose humanitarian parole has recently been revoked, rendering them unable to work or study. In the past six months, he has witnessed families torn apart by raids and deportations, or those too fearful of ICE to attend school. “I speak all the time with young people whose whole future is on the chopping block,” Axel shares.

Yet, despite his protections, Axel senses a looming threat that conditions could deteriorate rapidly. Under Trump, anti-immigrant sentiment and policies have become more entrenched. He is particularly concerned about the long-term implications of a new state law mandating that sheriffs cooperate with ICE. Axel fears for his and his family’s future, stating, “After 20 years, we’re barely scratching the surface of dealing with our status issues. It never ends—and the Trump administration is rolling back so much of the progress we’ve made.”

Source: Original article

Supreme Court Questions Legality of Conversion Therapy Ban for Minors

The Supreme Court is poised to evaluate Colorado’s ban on conversion therapy for minors, weighing the implications for free speech, faith, and LGBTQ+ protections.

The Supreme Court of the United States is currently reviewing Colorado’s controversial ban on conversion therapy, a practice aimed at changing an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity. The case has significant implications for First Amendment rights and the ongoing debate surrounding LGBTQ+ protections.

During oral arguments on Tuesday, the court’s conservative majority appeared inclined to support the claims of licensed counselor Kaley Chiles, who argues that the Colorado legislation infringes upon her free speech rights and the religious freedoms of both herself and her clients. Chiles contends that the law effectively censors private conversations between counselors and their clients, restricting the type of therapy she can provide.

Colorado’s law is part of a broader trend, with approximately two dozen states and Washington, D.C., enacting similar bans. The state government maintains that the legislation is necessary to regulate professional conduct, citing overwhelming evidence that conversion therapy is both unsafe and ineffective.

During the 90-minute oral arguments, several justices expressed skepticism about the law’s implications. Justice Samuel Alito highlighted a potential double standard, questioning whether the state could legitimately favor one viewpoint over another in the realm of medical advice. Justice Amy Coney Barrett echoed this sentiment, asking if the state could choose sides in a debate among medical experts regarding the safety of gender-affirming care.

Conversely, some justices sided with Colorado’s position, emphasizing the consensus among mental health professionals that verbal-based conversion therapy can be harmful. Justice Sonia Sotomayor pointed out that numerous studies indicate such practices can lead to emotional and physical distress.

The key justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, may ultimately determine the outcome of the case. Roberts referenced prior court rulings that did not differentiate between professional speech and other forms of expression, suggesting that the law could be seen as infringing upon protected speech.

Chiles’ legal team describes her as a practicing Christian who believes individuals thrive when they align their lives with what she describes as God’s design, which includes accepting their biological sex. She employs “faith-informed” counseling techniques to assist young clients who wish to navigate their sexual attractions and behaviors. However, her attorneys clarify that she does not aim to “cure” clients of same-sex attractions or change their sexual orientation.

Outside the courthouse, a small group of demonstrators gathered to support the Colorado law, while Chiles’ supporters canceled their planned rally due to safety concerns. Inside, the courtroom saw a stark contrast in perspectives regarding the efficacy of conversion therapy. Colorado’s representatives argued that a substantial body of evidence supports the law’s effectiveness in preventing harm, while Chiles’ team contended that existing studies are flawed and do not demonstrate harm from conversion therapy.

Chiles’ attorney, James Campbell, argued that states should not interfere in the private conversations between licensed professionals and their clients. The majority of justices seemed to resonate with this viewpoint. Justice Elena Kagan posed a hypothetical scenario in which two doctors treat a patient with differing approaches—one advocating for change and the other for acceptance. She questioned whether it was fair for one approach to be permissible while the other was not, suggesting a potential case of viewpoint discrimination.

As the arguments unfolded, Colorado Solicitor General Shannon Stevenson emphasized that the core issue at stake was not merely about free speech but about maintaining best practices in mental health care. Alito interjected, recalling instances in history where medical consensus has been influenced by political ideologies, questioning the reliability of such consensus.

The Trump administration’s Justice Department has also weighed in, arguing that the law creates a “muzzling” effect, preventing counselors from assisting clients in accepting their assigned sex at birth while allowing other therapists to support those exploring their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raised concerns about whether talk therapy should be treated differently from medical care, expressing confusion over why a therapist’s verbal guidance would not be afforded the same protections as a medical professional’s treatment.

Stevenson reiterated that the harm associated with conversion therapy arises when individuals are told they can change an inherent aspect of themselves, leading to feelings of shame and distress when they fail to do so. The American Psychiatric Association has not classified homosexuality as a mental illness for over five decades, further complicating the debate.

Chiles attended the oral arguments and later expressed her belief that her work is an extension of her faith. She advocates for access to voluntary counseling for struggling youth, arguing that they deserve better than a one-size-fits-all approach from the state.

The Supreme Court has faced a series of LGBTQ+-related cases in recent years, including a ruling that upheld a Tennessee law banning certain medical treatments for transgender teens. The court is also set to consider state laws regarding transgender athletes’ participation in girls’ and women’s sports teams.

The Colorado case has become a focal point for political and social discourse, with 187 House and Senate Democrats, along with major medical and mental health organizations, supporting the law. Conversely, groups backing Chiles include the Trump Justice Department and various conservative organizations.

In a 2015 report, the Obama administration’s Health and Human Services Department concluded that conversion therapy for minors should be prohibited. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) stated that there is no evidence supporting the effectiveness of such interventions in altering gender identity or sexual orientation.

The current case, Chiles v. Salazar (24-539), is expected to yield a ruling by early summer 2026, marking a significant moment in the ongoing legal and societal debates surrounding LGBTQ+ rights and mental health practices.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Explores Privatization of $1.6 Trillion Student Loan Debt

The Trump administration is exploring the privatization of parts of the $1.6 trillion federal student loan portfolio, raising concerns about borrower protections and repayment terms.

The Trump administration is considering options to privatize portions of the federal government’s substantial student loan portfolio, which currently stands at $1.6 trillion. This initiative could significantly alter the landscape of student loan management in the United States.

According to sources familiar with the discussions, senior officials from both the Education Department and the Treasury Department are engaged in talks about potentially selling high-performing segments of the federal student loan portfolio. This portfolio is owed by approximately 45 million Americans, and the administration aims to ensure the long-term health of the loans for the benefit of both students and taxpayers.

A senior administration official stated, “The Trump administration is committed to analyzing all aspects of the federal student loan portfolio. Unlike the previous administration, we are focused on ensuring the long-term health of the portfolio for the benefit of both students and taxpayers.”

However, not everyone is optimistic about the potential outcomes of such a move. Eileen Connor, executive director of the Project on Predatory Student Lending, expressed skepticism regarding the administration’s ability to structure a deal that would benefit both taxpayers and borrowers. “The only way for it to make economic sense is to structure the deal in a way that really short-changes borrowers,” she noted.

Connor highlighted that much of the value of federal student debt stems from unique powers that private entities do not possess. These include the ability to collect on loans indefinitely, garnish Social Security benefits and tax refunds, and enjoy broad immunity from lawsuits if the government mishandles borrowers’ debts.

As of late 2025, the total student loan debt in the United States has reached approximately $1.8 trillion, making it one of the largest sources of personal debt in the country. Of this, around $1.66 trillion consists of federal student loans held by over 42 million borrowers. The average federal student loan debt per borrower is roughly $39,000, with many individuals also carrying private loans that exacerbate their financial burdens.

The demographic most affected by this debt is individuals aged 35 to 49, who collectively owe about $570 billion. Additionally, borrowers over the age of 50 are increasingly facing serious repayment challenges. Delinquency rates have surged, exceeding 8% in early 2025, indicating a growing difficulty in meeting loan obligations.

In response to these challenges, the current administration has resumed student loan forgiveness programs under Income-Based Repayment, aiming to alleviate some of the financial pressure on borrowers. However, the potential sale of federal loans to private investors raises significant concerns about the future of loan management and repayment terms.

The rising delinquency rates underscore the repayment challenges many borrowers face. While the resumption of loan forgiveness programs provides some relief, the introduction of privatization could create uncertainty regarding future protections and repayment conditions for borrowers.

As discussions continue, the implications of privatizing parts of the federal student loan portfolio remain to be seen. Stakeholders are closely monitoring these developments, as they could have lasting effects on millions of borrowers across the nation.

Source: Original article

Trump-Era Education Policies Continue to Influence U.S. Universities

President Trump’s proposed cap on international students could significantly alter U.S. higher education, affecting university finances and America’s reputation as a global education leader.

President Donald Trump has proposed a cap on international students in U.S. universities, limiting their enrollment to 15% of an institution’s undergraduate population, with no more than 5% from any single country. This initiative, framed as a national security measure, aims to ensure that foreign students bring exceptional talent to the American economy while addressing concerns about the potential dilution of opportunities for American students.

The proposal raises alarms about the possibility of universities becoming saturated with students whose values may be perceived as “hostile to the United States,” which could pose national security risks. Current statistics indicate that most U.S. universities are below the proposed 15% cap for foreign undergraduates. For instance, institutions like the University of Arizona and the University of Texas report international student shares of approximately 4-5%, while Brown University stands at 13.5%. Only a few universities, such as Dartmouth College, slightly exceed the proposed limit, with a 15.5% international student population.

The 5% cap on single-country representation could significantly impact universities with large concentrations of international students. The University of Southern California (USC), for example, has historically enrolled a substantial number of Chinese undergraduates, with around 1,051 students, slightly above the proposed limit. Similarly, Vanderbilt University faces challenges with 377 Chinese undergraduates, exceeding the 5% cap of 361 students.

Experts warn that implementing such strict caps could hinder access to international talent and adversely affect universities that rely on foreign tuition to sustain their operations. Critics argue that this policy could undermine America’s status as a global education hub and create administrative burdens for institutions tasked with enforcing these limits.

This proposal comes at a time when U.S. universities are already experiencing a decline in foreign student enrollment, a trend influenced by visa restrictions, increased global competition, and shifting student preferences. DePaul University recently informed its faculty of immediate spending cuts following a 30% drop in international student enrollment this fall. This decision reflects a broader trend among U.S. colleges as they adapt to the repercussions of previous education and immigration policies enacted during the Trump administration.

While the exact scale of the budget cuts at DePaul has not been finalized, potential measures could include a hiring freeze, reductions in executive salaries, and limitations on discretionary spending, according to a memo from university president Robert Manuel shared with faculty. DePaul is not alone; at least 35 other U.S. colleges have announced budget reductions in response to policies from the Trump administration. Notably, Johns Hopkins University eliminated over 2,000 positions in March following an $800 million reduction in federal research grants, while Northwestern University cut 425 jobs. The University of Southern California also laid off more than 630 employees, citing declining federal funding and anticipated drops in international student enrollment among other financial challenges.

As universities finalize their fall enrollment figures, a comprehensive national picture is still pending. Preliminary data from the Department of Homeland Security’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) indicates a 2.4% decline in international students this month compared to last September, dropping from 965,437 to 942,131. However, these numbers are subject to change as many institutions have yet to report their updated totals and student movement continues throughout the semester.

Last year, an estimated 1.2 million international students were enrolled in U.S. institutions, according to NAFSA: Association of International Educators. The organization projected in July that this figure could decrease by as much as 15% this year, potentially resulting in an economic loss of nearly $7 billion for the country.

This proposed cap on international students could have far-reaching implications for U.S. higher education, impacting not only university finances but also the nation’s ability to attract global talent and maintain its status as a premier education destination.

Source: Original article

New Jersey Democrat Plans Lawsuit Against Trump Over Troop Deployments

New Jersey gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill has pledged to sue President Trump if he deploys National Guard troops to the state, arguing that such actions would be illegal and unnecessary.

Mikie Sherrill, a former Navy veteran and current representative of New Jersey’s 11th Congressional District, has expressed her strong opposition to the deployment of National Guard troops in her state. During a town hall meeting broadcast live on Univision 41 Nueva York, Sherrill made it clear that she would take legal action against the Trump administration should the president decide to send federal troops to New Jersey.

The town hall audience, which engaged with Sherrill in Spanish while she responded in English, included a member whose family fled the Nicolás Maduro regime in Venezuela. This individual posed a question regarding Sherrill’s stance on potential troop deployments by President Trump. In her response, Sherrill emphasized that American troops should not be patrolling the streets of the country except in extraordinary circumstances, such as during an insurrection or a national crisis.

“Troops are not trained for policing missions like local law enforcement,” Sherrill stated. She further elaborated on her position, saying, “And that’s why, as governor, should Trump try to deploy troops on our streets, I would be very opposed to that. I’d immediately take him to court and demand that he stop this – because I think it’s illegal – and ensure that here in New Jersey, people are kept safe.”

Sherrill is currently running against Republican candidate Jack Ciattarelli in the race to succeed term-limited Democratic Governor Phil Murphy. Her remarks come in the context of President Trump’s recent actions, which have included the deployment or threats of deployment of federal troops to various cities across the United States, including Baltimore, Los Angeles, and Memphis. The administration has characterized these cities as crime-ridden and in need of federal intervention.

In Illinois, Governor J.B. Pritzker has also taken legal action against the Trump administration, seeking to block the deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago. This lawsuit was initiated following a federal judge’s decision to halt the deployment of Guard troops in Portland, Oregon, amid protests related to immigration enforcement.

The Trump administration has defended its troop deployments, asserting that they are essential for curbing violent crime and restoring law and order. However, critics, including various officials, have accused the administration of overreach, arguing that federal intervention often exacerbates tensions rather than alleviating them.

In a recent ruling, a federal judge stated that the Trump administration “willfully” violated federal law by deploying Guard troops to Los Angeles earlier this year in response to protests concerning immigration raids.

As the gubernatorial race heats up, Sherrill’s commitment to legal action against potential troop deployments highlights the ongoing debate over federal intervention in local law enforcement and the implications it holds for state sovereignty and public safety.

Source: Original article

Grandmother Deported to India After Three Decades in the U.S.

A Sikh grandmother who lived in the U.S. for over 30 years was deported to India after enduring harsh conditions in an ICE detention center, raising concerns about the treatment of vulnerable immigrants.

A Sikh grandmother, Harjit Kaur, who had resided in the United States for more than three decades, was deported to New Delhi, India, on September 23. Her deportation followed a week spent in what her attorney described as “barbaric” conditions at a private Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention center in Georgia.

“There was no rationale to detain Bibi Harjit Kaur,” said Deepak Ahluwalia, Kaur’s attorney, in an interview with American Community Media on September 24. “It’s all part of their effort to fill beds.”

Ahluwalia expressed deep concern over Kaur’s treatment, emphasizing her age and health issues. “Her detention was nothing short of barbaric,” he stated. “That type of treatment would affect most people. They chose to do this to a 73-year-old woman with disabilities and health issues.”

Kaur was initially detained at an ICE facility in Bakersfield, California, before being transferred to the Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Georgia, without any notification to her family or attorney.

During her time in detention, Kaur faced numerous challenges. According to Ahluwalia, she was denied water to take her medications and was instead given a plate of ice, which she could not consume due to her dentures. In Lumpkin, she was forced to sleep on the floor in a crowded facility, which was particularly difficult for her given her recent knee surgeries. Additionally, as a strict vegetarian, Kaur was provided meat-based meals for the first six days of her detention. She also experienced multiple instances of being handcuffed during transfers.

The Stewart Detention Center is a private facility operated by CoreCivic, a company that has faced scrutiny for its treatment of detainees.

Kaur, a seamstress who worked at the Berkeley Sari Palace for over 20 years, initially sought asylum in the U.S. in 1991 after the death of her husband. Her asylum claim was based on a credible fear of persecution in India, particularly in the wake of the anti-Sikh riots that followed the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1984. This tragic event led to the deaths of thousands of Sikhs and has been described by many international civil rights organizations as a genocide.

In 2023, California State Assemblywoman Jasmeet Bains introduced AJR2 to recognize the 1984 anti-Sikh riots as genocide. The resolution passed both the state Assembly and Senate without requiring the governor’s signature. A similar measure was introduced in Congress last October by Rep. David Valadao, R-California.

Kaur’s asylum case was denied twice, with the last denial occurring in 2013 by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. After her asylum claim was rejected, she needed travel documents to return to India but had not received the necessary paperwork when she was arrested by ICE on September 8 during a routine check-in at the ICE office in San Francisco. Kaur had consistently complied with immigration authorities, making the required check-ins every six months for the past 12 years.

Her family was unable to sponsor her for permanent residency due to her undocumented status. Ahluwalia explained that an undocumented resident’s family cannot apply for sponsorship while the individual is still in the U.S. Kaur would have needed to return to India to obtain a family-based visa, which was complicated by her lack of travel documents.

In a statement released last week, Kaur’s family expressed their dismay, stating, “Harjit’s case represents a failure of our immigration system. She has been a contributing member of her community for decades, paying taxes, working legally, and building relationships with neighbors and friends. Her detention is not only cruel but unnecessary.”

They further noted, “She has never refused to return to India but cannot without documents.”

Dr. K. Srikar Reddy, the Consul General of India in San Francisco, commented on the situation, stating that it is ICE’s responsibility to request travel documents for individuals being deported. He noted that no such request had been made in the 12 years since Kaur’s asylum claim was rejected.

“Once ICE requests travel documents, it usually takes just a couple of days for us to issue them,” Reddy explained. “But Mrs. Kaur had migrated more than 30 years ago, so we had no information about her. We had to connect with Indian authorities, which took some time.”

When asked whether Kaur might face persecution upon her return to India, Reddy stated, “She was denied by the highest appeals court. That clearly shows that her fears of persecution were unfounded.”

In a statement to NBC News, ICE defended its actions, asserting that Kaur had exhausted all legal remedies several years ago. “ICE is enforcing U.S. law and the orders by the judge; she will not waste any more U.S. tax dollars,” the statement read.

According to the Pew Research Center, India was the fifth largest source of unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. as of 2022-2023, following Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras. Reddy noted a slight increase in requests for travel documents over the past seven months.

Estimates suggest that approximately 1.5 million undocumented individuals over the age of 55 reside in the United States. However, ICE does not provide age-specific data on deportations.

Source: Original article

Brazil Sees Over 120 Methanol Poisoning Cases from Tainted Liquor

Brazil’s Health Ministry reports 127 suspected cases of methanol poisoning linked to tainted liquor, prompting emergency measures and widespread panic across the nation.

The Brazilian Ministry of Health has issued a warning to the public to avoid cocktails following a series of methanol poisoning incidents that have resulted in at least one death and left several others with severe health complications. The alarming situation has triggered a nationwide panic as reports of suspected poisonings continue to rise.

As of now, there are 127 suspected cases of methanol-laced liquor across Brazil, with 11 confirmed cases and 116 others still under investigation. The affected areas include at least five states and the capital, Brasília. Local media reports indicate that victims have included patrons at upscale bars and restaurants, many of whom have experienced life-altering consequences such as blindness or comas after consuming popular Brazilian drinks like caipirinhas and vodka tonics.

Rafael Martinez, a 30-year-old architect from São Paulo, expressed his concerns about the situation. “I’m definitely not going out to drink this weekend. Things are worrying,” he said. “For now, I’d rather stick to soda or, at most, beer, which they said is harder to tamper with.”

In response to the crisis, Health Minister Alexandre Padilha has urged Brazilians to “steer clear of colorless spirits.” The ministry has announced emergency measures, including the acquisition of 2,500 doses of fomepizole, an antidote for methanol poisoning, along with 12,000 ampoules of medical-grade ethanol. Shipments of these antidotes began on Saturday to five states, as the government works to prevent further fatalities.

Most of the reported cases have originated in São Paulo, although instances have also been identified in distant states such as Pernambuco and Mato Grosso do Sul. Padilha assured the public that the new stockpile of antidotes would ensure “no patient goes without treatment,” emphasizing that the antidotes can be administered even before laboratory confirmation of methanol poisoning.

Federal police are currently investigating a potential connection to organized crime groups suspected of distributing counterfeit liquor. Methanol, an industrial chemical, is known to cause serious nerve and liver damage and is often found in fake or poorly distilled alcoholic beverages.

In light of the crisis, many restaurant owners have suspended liquor sales to reassure anxious customers. Nikolaos Loukopoulos, who operates a Greek restaurant in São Paulo, noted, “Last night no one bought drinks … even I don’t want to drink. With a beer, we’re fine in this heat. Why risk it?”

While Rio de Janeiro, a major tourist destination, has not yet reported any confirmed cases, local beach kiosks and restaurants have taken to social media to post warnings aimed at calming visitors. Thais Flores, a 28-year-old dental surgeon visiting Rio from São Paulo, shared her cautious approach to drinking. “I don’t really like beer, but because of the latest news, it’s been my drink of choice,” she said.

Her friend, Raquel Marques, 29, admitted to taking a risk by ordering a vodka caipirinha despite the warnings. “I’m scared, but we took a chance,” she said. “The guy said he bought it at the market.”

The timing of this scare is particularly concerning as Brazil approaches its peak tourism season, raising fears of a significant economic impact on the country’s vibrant beaches and nightlife industry. The situation remains fluid, and authorities continue to monitor and respond to the crisis as it unfolds.

Source: Original article

Supreme Court Begins Pivotal Term Amid Tests for Trump’s Presidency

The Supreme Court’s new term will address significant constitutional questions regarding presidential authority, particularly in relation to President Trump’s executive actions and their legal challenges.

The Supreme Court is set to begin its new term on Monday, focusing on controversial prior rulings and reviewing the sweeping executive agenda of President Donald Trump. After a three-month recess, the nine justices reconvened to reset their docket and discuss appeals that accumulated over the summer. This term, the Court will tackle a range of issues, including gender identity, election redistricting, and free speech. However, the specter of Trump-era legal battles looms large as the administration’s appeals reach the high court for final review.

Since January, the Supreme Court has largely favored the Trump administration in emergency appeals, which primarily addressed whether challenged policies could temporarily go into effect while lower courts deliberated. These cases have encompassed immigration, federal spending cuts, workforce reductions, and policies concerning transgender individuals in the military. The conservative majority, which holds a 6-3 advantage, has reversed approximately two dozen nationwide injunctions imposed by lower federal courts, leading to frustration and confusion among judges.

Legal analysts suggest that the Court may be poised to grant broad unilateral powers to the president as these petitions reach the Supreme Court for final review. The justices have fast-tracked the administration’s appeal concerning tariffs on numerous countries that were previously blocked by lower courts, with oral arguments scheduled for November. In December, they will consider whether to overturn a 90-year precedent regarding the president’s authority to dismiss members of certain federal regulatory agencies, such as the Federal Trade Commission. Additionally, in January, the Court will evaluate President Trump’s power to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors.

Thomas Dupree, a prominent appellate attorney and constitutional law expert, noted, “A big fraction of the Supreme Court’s docket will present the question: ‘can President Trump do?’— then fill in the blank.” This could encompass imposing tariffs, firing independent board members, removing undocumented immigrants, or deploying the military in cities like Los Angeles. Much of the Court’s decisions this term will revolve around whether the president has acted within or exceeded his authority.

The tariffs dispute represents the Court’s first major constitutional test regarding the extent of presidential power, setting a precedent for future appeals related to Trump’s executive agenda. In earlier cases concerning temporary enforcement of these policies, the Court’s liberal justices cautioned against the judiciary becoming a mere rubber stamp for presidential actions. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized her conservative colleagues for accommodating the Trump administration, stating, “Right when the Judiciary should be hunkering down to do all it can to preserve the law’s constraints, the Court opts instead to make vindicating the rule of law and preventing manifestly injurious Government action as difficult as possible.”

Despite these criticisms, some justices have denied that they are facilitating Trump’s aggressive attempts to reshape the federal government. Justice Brett Kavanaugh emphasized the importance of separating powers, stating, “No one person or group of people should have too much power in our system.” Justice Amy Coney Barrett echoed this sentiment, asserting that the Court does not align with political parties and is focused on making impartial decisions. “We’re taking each case and we’re looking at the question of presidential power as it comes,” Barrett remarked.

The ideological divisions within the Court are expected to intensify as justices examine the scope of presidential power and their own authority. Trump has previously suggested that actions taken in the name of national interest may justify legal violations, stating, “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.” Federal courts have been grappling with defining the limits of executive power while also managing their own jurisdiction.

Numerous federal judges, appointed by both Democratic and Republican administrations, have expressed concern over the Supreme Court’s frequent overturning of lower court rulings related to Trump administration policies, often with minimal explanation. These judges, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, conveyed that such actions have created a perception of bias against the president and have left them feeling ineffective in their roles.

Judge James Wynn, a federal appeals judge, criticized the high court for leaving lower courts in a state of uncertainty, stating, “We’re out here flailing… They could easily just give us direction, and we would follow it.” While the Trump administration has achieved short-term victories in a Court where he appointed a third of the justices, the president and his associates have not hesitated to criticize federal judges, even calling for their impeachment when rulings have not favored the administration.

According to an analysis by Stanford University’s Adam Bonica, federal district judges ruled against the Trump administration 94.3% of the time between May and June. However, the Supreme Court has reversed those injunctions over 90% of the time, granting the president temporary authority to advance his reform agenda.

The Supreme Court’s reluctance to directly criticize Trump has been evident, with justices navigating a delicate balance. Justice Sonia Sotomayor recently remarked on the challenges facing the rule of law, stating, “Once we lose our common norms, we’ve lost the rule of law completely.” Chief Justice John Roberts has also publicly addressed the calls for impeachment from the right, emphasizing the need for judicial integrity.

As public confidence in major institutions continues to decline, a recent Fox News poll indicated that 47% of voters approve of the Supreme Court’s performance, a notable increase from the previous year. However, a significant portion of the public perceives the Court as leaning too conservative, with 43% of voters expressing this sentiment.

This term, the Court’s ability to remain apolitical will be tested as it considers several contentious appeals, including those related to same-sex marriage and school prayer. The justices are expected to decide soon whether to include these cases on their argument calendar, with potential rulings anticipated by June 2026.

As the Supreme Court embarks on this pivotal term, the implications of its decisions on presidential power and the broader legal landscape will be closely watched. The outcomes may not only affect the current administration but could also shape the trajectory of future presidencies.

Source: Original article

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Key Cases on Tariffs and LGBTQ Rights

The new U.S. Supreme Court term opens with significant cases that may redefine presidential power and constitutional rights, including issues related to tariffs, birthright citizenship, and LGBTQ rights.

A new term of the U.S. Supreme Court has commenced, bringing with it a series of landmark cases that could significantly reshape the landscape of presidential power and constitutional rights.

At the forefront of this term are President Donald Trump’s assertive claims of executive authority, which are now under intense scrutiny. Several of his controversial policies are set to be reviewed by the Court, including expansive tariff powers, restrictions on birthright citizenship, and the authority of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions.

One of the most anticipated cases will address the participation of transgender girls and women in public school sports. This case will test the legal protections afforded under Title IX, as well as broader constitutional guarantees related to gender identity and equality.

In addition to these issues, the Court will also consider challenges to voting rights, particularly focusing on Louisiana’s redistricting efforts and potential reinterpretations of the Voting Rights Act. These cases are expected to have far-reaching implications for electoral processes and representation in the United States.

Thus far, the Court’s conservative majority has demonstrated a willingness to entertain some of Trump’s emergency appeals. However, as the cases are examined in detail, there is a possibility that the justices may adopt a more cautious approach in their rulings.

Justice Samuel Alito, currently 76 years old, is speculated to be considering retirement in 2026. Should he choose to step down, it would present Trump with the opportunity to appoint another conservative justice, further influencing the ideological balance of the Court.

Legal analysts suggest that this term could be one of the most politically charged in recent memory, with the potential to impact a wide range of issues that resonate deeply with the American public.

As the Supreme Court navigates these high-stakes cases, the outcomes may set significant precedents that could affect the balance of power between the executive branch and the judiciary, as well as the rights of individuals across the nation.

Source: Original article

New Study Finds Leprosy in the Americas Before European Arrival

The discovery of Mycobacterium lepromatosis indicates that leprosy existed in the Americas long before European explorers arrived, challenging previous historical assumptions about the disease.

Scientists have unveiled a significant finding regarding the history of leprosy in the Americas, suggesting that the disease was present long before the arrival of European explorers. Researchers from the Institut Pasteur in Paris, France, in collaboration with a U.S. university, have identified a second species of bacteria responsible for leprosy, known as Hansen’s disease.

Traditionally, it was believed that the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae was the sole cause of leprosy and that it was introduced to the Americas by early European settlers. However, the recent discovery of Mycobacterium lepromatosis challenges this narrative, indicating that a strain of the bacteria was already endemic to the continent prior to European contact.

Dr. Maria Lopopolo, the first author of the study and a researcher at the Laboratory of Microbial Paleogenomics at the Institut Pasteur, emphasized the importance of this finding. “This discovery transforms our understanding of the history of leprosy in America. It shows that a form of the disease was already endemic among Indigenous populations well before the Europeans arrived,” she stated in a news release.

The study, which involved collaboration with the French National Center for Scientific Research and the University of Colorado, was initiated after Mycobacterium lepromatosis was identified in a Mexican patient in 2008 and subsequently in red squirrels in the British Isles in 2016. Researchers employed advanced genetic techniques to reconstruct the genomes of Mycobacterium lepromatosis from ancient individuals in Argentina and Canada.

The results revealed that the two strains from these different regions were closely related within the Mycobacterium genome family tree, suggesting that the bacteria spread rapidly across the continent. This finding confirms that Mycobacterium lepromatosis was already prevalent throughout North and South America.

In their research, the scientists worked closely with Indigenous communities, various international institutions, and archaeologists. They analyzed over 800 DNA samples from ancient human remains and recent medical cases exhibiting signs of leprosy.

Nicolás Rascovan, the lead author of the study at the Institut Pasteur, remarked on the implications of their findings, stating, “We are just beginning to uncover the diversity and global movements of this recently identified pathogen. This study allows us to hypothesize that there might be unknown animal reservoirs.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides information on leprosy, noting that the disease can affect the nerves, skin, and eyes of patients. Leprosy is treatable with antibiotics, and the CDC reports that up to 225 people in the U.S. and approximately 250,000 individuals worldwide contract Hansen’s disease each year.

This groundbreaking research not only alters the historical understanding of leprosy in the Americas but also opens new avenues for exploring the disease’s origins and its impact on Indigenous populations.

Source: Original article

Three Common Fruits May Improve Sleep Quality for Americans

Nutritionist Kendall Mackintosh highlights three fruits that can enhance sleep quality and help Americans fall asleep faster.

As many Americans struggle with sleep, nutritionist Kendall Mackintosh suggests that hitting the fruit aisle might be a beneficial strategy. Certain fruits, rich in natural hormones and antioxidants, can aid in falling asleep more easily.

Mackintosh, a board-certified and licensed dietitian nutritionist, explained to Fox News Digital that some fruits are “rich in melatonin and antioxidants that help regulate circadian rhythms and repair cells overnight.” This insight comes at a time when many are looking for natural solutions to improve their sleep quality.

With the arrival of fall, which brings shorter days and less natural light, Mackintosh emphasizes the importance of supporting melatonin production. “This time of year, supporting melatonin naturally becomes even more important for sleep, mood, and metabolism,” she noted.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 14.5% of Americans reported having trouble falling asleep “most days or every day” in 2020. This statistic underscores the growing need for effective sleep aids.

One fruit that stands out for its sleep-inducing properties is tart cherries. The Cleveland Clinic notes that tart cherries can help increase melatonin levels in the body. Melatonin is a natural hormone produced by the brain’s pineal gland, which plays a crucial role in regulating the sleep-wake cycle.

In addition to melatonin, cherries contain tryptophan, an amino acid that contributes to the production of serotonin and melatonin. Mackintosh recommends Montmorency cherries specifically, as they are known for their tart flavor and high melatonin content.

Another fruit that can aid sleep is kiwi. Mackintosh points to a study published in the National Library of Medicine, which found that consuming kiwis “significantly improved” sleep quality and duration. The four-week study, conducted in 2024, monitored the sleep and recovery of elite athletes, concluding that kiwi consumption led to better subjective sleep quality and daytime function.

Grapes are also highlighted as a potential sleep aid. Registered dietitian Anthony DiMarino informed the Cleveland Clinic that grapes contain a degree of melatonin, making them a suitable evening snack. “They don’t have a lot of calories, and they can potentially help you fall asleep,” DiMarino explained.

However, the way grapes are consumed is crucial for maximizing their benefits. DiMarino advises choosing grapes in their natural form rather than opting for processed alternatives like grape juice or raisins. “What’s most important is that you choose an option closest to its natural form,” he said.

Beyond dietary choices, Mackintosh emphasizes the importance of lifestyle factors in promoting better sleep. She recommends reducing exposure to blue light from screens in the evening and keeping the bedroom cool and dark. “Together, these diet and lifestyle choices create the foundation for deeper rest, better resilience, and long-term vitality,” Mackintosh concluded.

With these insights, incorporating tart cherries, kiwi, and grapes into your diet may offer a natural way to enhance sleep quality and overall well-being.

Source: Original article

U.S. Government Faces Accountability for Migrant Detentions in El Salvador

After 125 days in El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, two Venezuelan nationals were released, prompting calls for accountability from the U.S. government for their detention and treatment.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Venezuelan nationals Edicson Quintero Chacón and Jose Manuel Ramos Bastidas were released yesterday after spending 125 days in El Salvador’s infamous Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT). Their release came on a U.S.-brokered flight back to Venezuela, alongside approximately 250 other Venezuelans detained at CECOT, a facility criticized for its inhumane conditions.

Counsel for both men expressed relief at their release but underscored the urgent need for accountability regarding their initial detention. The U.S. government transferred the men to CECOT on March 15, 2025, where they were held without charges and incommunicado, in a facility known for mass arbitrary detention and mistreatment.

Both Quintero and Bastidas had previously been ordered removed from the United States. They informed a federal court that they wished to return home to Venezuela, but instead, they were sent to CECOT. The agreement between the U.S. and El Salvador stipulated that the U.S. would send members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA), yet there is no evidence linking either man to the gang. Their return to Venezuela was part of a prisoner swap deal that also involved the release of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents from Venezuela.

A family member of Quintero, who requested anonymity, expressed shock at the sudden news of the flights to Venezuela. “Edicson should never have been sent to CECOT in the first place. No one should. He was treated cruelly and inhumanely when all he wanted was safety,” they said. “This so-called prisoner swap doesn’t undo the injustice he suffered, nor the pain and terror that my family has had to endure in the past several months.”

Roynerliz Rodriguez, the partner of Jose Manuel Ramos Bastidas, shared her relief at his release. “We have been waiting for this moment for months, and I feel like I can finally breathe, knowing that Jose Manuel is now free from CECOT and on his way home,” she said. “His son, whom he hasn’t seen since he was four months old, is eagerly waiting for him. These last months have been a living nightmare.”

Concerns remain regarding the legality and transparency of the U.S. government’s actions. Many individuals sent to CECOT had pending asylum claims and expressed credible fears of returning to Venezuela. Their forced return, without due process to address their asylum requests, raises significant questions about the U.S. government’s compliance with both domestic and international legal obligations.

There has been no public accounting of how individuals were selected for transfer to CECOT, nor has there been a comprehensive list of those detained. The lack of transparency raises further concerns about whether all victims are accounted for.

The practice of outsourcing detention to foreign facilities, particularly those with documented records of systemic abuse, poses serious human rights and due process issues. Critics argue that the U.S. government should not engage in such arrangements or collaborate with regimes that violate human rights. A full investigation into these disappearances is necessary, along with safeguards to prevent similar actions by future administrations.

Rebecca Cassler, a senior litigation attorney at the American Immigration Council, stated, “We are deeply relieved that Mr. Quintero Chacón and Mr. Ramos Bastidas are finally released from CECOT, but this should never have happened in the first place. The U.S. government paid to detain these men in one of the world’s most notorious prisons, then denied responsibility while they suffered.”

CJ Sandley, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights, emphasized the inhumane treatment of the detainees. “The deals made for these Venezuelans’ confinement and transfers treat human beings as bargaining chips and underscore the cruel consequences of criminalizing migration and monetizing torture,” he said. “The U.S. government must stop these abuses and uphold its obligations to protect the rights and dignity of all people.”

Stephanie M. Alvarez-Jones, Southeast Regional Attorney at the National Immigration Project, also expressed her relief at the men’s release. “It is unconscionable that they and 250 other Venezuelan men were sent by the United States to be detained at CECOT and forced to endure suffering,” she said. “While we celebrate their long overdue release, the government must be held accountable for its outrageous actions.”

The American Immigration Council, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and the National Immigration Project represent Mr. Quintero Chacón and Mr. Ramos Bastidas in their habeas corpus proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, where they have been fighting for their freedom from CECOT.

Source: Original article

SAAJCO Initiates Lawsuit Against $100,000 H-1B Fee for Indian-Americans

Labor unions, healthcare providers, and educational institutions have filed a lawsuit against President Trump’s new $100,000 fee for H-1B visa applications, claiming it threatens essential services and the economy.

A coalition of labor unions, healthcare providers, educational institutions, and religious organizations has initiated a lawsuit to challenge a recent executive action by President Trump that imposes a $100,000 fee on every new H-1B visa application. Filed on October 3, the lawsuit aims to halt what the plaintiffs describe as an unlawful and detrimental policy that could severely impact the American workforce and economy.

The proclamation, issued on September 19, 2025, and made effective just 36 hours later, has already created confusion among employers, workers, and federal agencies. Kalpana V. Peddibhotla, Executive Director of the South Asian American Justice Collaborative (SAAJCO), emphasized the importance of H-1B workers, stating, “South Asians make up the majority of H-1B workers and are part of the fabric of America, staffing rural hospitals, advancing lifesaving research, and driving innovation in businesses across the country.”

The lawsuit, titled *Global Nurse Force et al v. Trump et al.*, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It argues that the executive order is unconstitutional and violates the Administrative Procedure Act. The coalition of plaintiffs includes organizations such as Global Nurse Force, Global Village Academy Collaborative, and the American Association of University Professors, among others.

The H-1B visa program was established by Congress to attract highly skilled professionals from around the world to fill critical roles in the U.S. economy and public services. This program allows U.S. employers to hire qualified foreign talent, including doctors, nurses, engineers, and researchers, after a thorough vetting process.

The coalition’s lawsuit highlights the potential consequences of the new fee, which they argue could lead to significant harm for communities across the nation. Peddibhotla noted that when the government makes it prohibitively expensive for skilled professionals to come to the U.S., entire communities suffer. “Patients wait longer for care, students have fewer teachers, and local economies miss out on the innovation and jobs these experts create,” she said.

The complaint outlines several key arguments against the new fee. It asserts that the fee violates the legislative framework established by Congress, which includes a carefully structured fee and oversight system for the H-1B program. The plaintiffs contend that the President does not have the authority to unilaterally impose such a fee or to create new taxes through executive action.

Additionally, the lawsuit claims that the proclamation invites chaos and favoritism by introducing a vague “national interest” loophole for fee exemptions, which could lead to arbitrary decision-making. The plaintiffs argue that the fee will disproportionately affect rural hospitals, schools, and nonprofit organizations that rely on H-1B workers to fulfill essential roles.

Economists have pointed out that H-1B workers contribute significantly to job creation and innovation in the U.S. economy. The lawsuit warns that forcing skilled talent to seek opportunities abroad could lead to a loss of jobs and innovation within the country. “Without relief, hospitals will lose medical staff, churches will lose pastors, classrooms will lose teachers, and industries across the country risk losing key innovators,” the complaint states.

The coalition is requesting that the court block the implementation of the $100,000 fee and restore predictability for employers and workers. Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors, expressed concern about the implications of the new policy, stating, “Trump’s restrictions on H-1B visa applications will lead to less lifesaving research, reduced innovation, and diminished competitiveness.”

Dr. Taylor Walker, President of the Committee of Interns and Residents, SEIU, added that the fee would have a devastating impact on healthcare, particularly at a time when the U.S. is facing a physician shortage. “The unconscionable fee for H-1B petitions will reduce the number of resident physicians available to provide care,” he said.

Skye Perryman, President and CEO of Democracy Forward, criticized the fee as a tactic to undermine American innovation and essential work. “This exorbitant fee invites corruption and is unlawful, destabilizing, and bad for everyone,” she stated. “H-1B workers keep rural hospitals staffed, bring STEM education to schools with teacher shortages, advance lifesaving medical research, and help small businesses thrive.”

As the lawsuit progresses, the coalition seeks to have the court declare the proclamation unlawful and prevent the government from enforcing the new fee. Peddibhotla remarked, “We are asking the court to block the government from enforcing the $100,000 fee and require agencies to continue processing H-1B petitions under the law that Congress put in place.”

The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the future of the H-1B visa program and the broader landscape of immigration policy in the United States.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Influence Dominates Key Races as Election Day Approaches

As Election Day 2025 approaches, President Trump’s influence looms large over key gubernatorial races in New Jersey and Virginia, alongside significant ballot measures in California and Pennsylvania.

The upcoming elections in November 2025 feature crucial gubernatorial contests in New Jersey and Virginia, alongside significant ballot propositions regarding congressional redistricting in California and state Supreme Court races in Pennsylvania. Although Donald Trump’s name will not appear on the ballot, his unprecedented second-term agenda and the ongoing federal government shutdown are central themes on the campaign trail as candidates prepare for the pivotal day.

New Jersey and Virginia are the only two states holding gubernatorial elections in the year following a presidential election, making these races critical early indicators of Trump’s popularity and agenda. They serve as important barometers ahead of the midterm elections for the U.S. House and Senate scheduled for the following year.

In New Jersey, the gubernatorial race has become a battleground where Trump’s influence is palpable. Republican nominee Jack Ciattarelli, who has the backing of the former president, argues that his opponent, Democratic nominee Rep. Mikie Sherrill, is using Trump as a political weapon. “Listen, if you get a flat tire on the way home from work today, she’s going to blame it on the president. There isn’t anything she doesn’t blame on the president,” Ciattarelli stated in a recent interview.

Sherrill, on the other hand, has accused Ciattarelli of enabling Trump’s agenda, asserting in a fundraising email, “As Trump has inflicted all this damage on our country, Republican politicians like Jack Ciattarelli have cheered him on every step of the way.” During their first debate, she claimed that Ciattarelli would “do whatever Trump tells him to do,” further intensifying the rhetoric surrounding the race.

The candidates have also exchanged barbs over the ongoing federal government shutdown, which has significant implications for New Jersey. Ciattarelli pointed to Sherrill’s congressional vote against a bipartisan effort to keep the government open, while Sherrill placed the blame for the shutdown squarely on Trump, stating, “This is precisely the extreme MAGA agenda that @Jack4NJ wants to bring to NJ.”

As the two candidates prepare for their second and final debate, Ciattarelli, a former state lawmaker and certified public accountant, downplays the notion that Trump is the dominant issue in the race. He seeks to link Sherrill to the policies of term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy and the long-standing Democratic control of the state legislature.

The race has also been marred by controversy, particularly after reports surfaced regarding Sherrill’s military records. Two weeks ago, it was revealed that the United States Naval Academy had blocked her from attending her graduation in 1994 due to a cheating scandal. Ciattarelli’s campaign has called for Sherrill to release her military records to clarify the situation. However, a subsequent report indicated that the National Personnel Records Center mistakenly released her redacted military files, prompting calls for an investigation from top Democrats.

In Virginia, the gubernatorial race features Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears competing against former Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger. Earle-Sears, who made history as Virginia’s first female lieutenant governor, is vying to succeed GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin, who is ineligible for re-election due to state law prohibiting consecutive terms.

Both candidates are poised to make history, as the winner will become Virginia’s first female governor. If Earle-Sears prevails, she will also be the first Black woman elected as governor in the United States. Trump’s policies and influence are significant factors in this race, particularly as the federal government shutdown is expected to impact Virginia’s economy.

In New York City, the mayoral election is drawing considerable attention, especially with the potential for the city to elect its first Muslim and first millennial mayor. Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old state lawmaker, emerged victorious in the Democratic primary, creating political waves across the nation. He faces challenges from former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is running as an independent after resigning amid scandals, and two-time Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa.

Despite dropping out of the race, current Mayor Eric Adams remains on the ballot, adding to the complexity of the election. Trump’s influence in the race has been notable, given his New York roots and ongoing presence in political discourse.

In California, voters will decide on Proposition 50, which seeks to temporarily suspend the nonpartisan redistricting commission and allow the Democrat-controlled legislature to determine congressional redistricting for the next three election cycles. This move is seen as an effort by Gov. Gavin Newsom and California Democrats to create additional left-leaning congressional seats, countering recent redistricting efforts in Texas that were influenced by Trump.

Finally, in Pennsylvania, three Democrat-leaning justices on the state Supreme Court are facing retention elections after completing their ten-year terms. The outcome of these elections could significantly alter the court’s composition and impact critical issues such as voting rights and reproductive rights in a key battleground state.

As Election Day approaches, the interplay of Trump’s influence and the various races across the country will be closely watched, with implications that could shape the political landscape for years to come.

Source: Original article

FBI Ends Partnership with Anti-Defamation League Amid Conservative Criticism

The FBI has severed its ties with the Anti-Defamation League, citing accusations of the organization spying on conservatives amid a backlash from prominent right-wing figures.

The FBI has officially cut ties with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), alleging that the organization has engaged in spying on conservatives. This announcement was made by FBI Director Kash Patel on Wednesday, following criticism from notable conservatives, including Elon Musk, regarding the ADL’s classification of the late right-wing activist Charlie Kirk in its “Glossary of Extremism and Hate.”

In his statement, Patel highlighted the ADL’s connections to former FBI Director James Comey, who has been a vocal critic of former President Donald Trump. Comey was indicted last week on charges of obstruction and lying to Congress. Patel emphasized, “This FBI won’t partner with political fronts masquerading as watchdogs,” in a post on social media.

Comey, during a 2014 speech at the ADL’s National Leadership Summit, praised the organization for its contributions to law enforcement training. He noted that the FBI had made the ADL’s Law Enforcement and Society training mandatory for its personnel and collaborated with the group to create a “Hate Crimes Training Manual.” Comey described the ADL’s expertise in investigating hate crimes as “essential” and its training as “eye-opening and insightful.”

While Patel did not specifically mention Kirk in his announcement, it came shortly after the ADL removed over 1,000 references to alleged extremism associated with him. The ADL stated that the decision was made because many of the terms were outdated and that some entries had been “intentionally misrepresented and misused.”

The ADL has previously characterized Kirk and his organization, Turning Point USA (TPUSA), as promoting “Christian nationalism” and espousing various conspiracy theories related to election fraud and COVID-19. The organization also claimed that TPUSA attracted racists and that its representatives had made “bigoted remarks” about minority groups and the LGBTQ community. Additionally, it noted that white nationalists had attended TPUSA events, despite the group’s claims of rejecting white supremacist ideology.

Kirk, who was vocal in his criticisms of the ADL while alive, labeled the organization a “hate group that dons a religious mask to justify stoking hatred of the left’s enemies.” In response to Patel’s recent statement, the ADL expressed its “deep respect” for the FBI and for law enforcement officers dedicated to protecting all Americans, regardless of their ancestry, religion, ethnicity, faith, or political affiliation. The ADL reaffirmed its commitment to combating antisemitism, especially in light of a significant increase in such incidents.

Critics of the ADL, including some on the left, have accused the organization of attempting to align itself with conservative figures. They argue that the ADL has been quick to criticize leftist individuals, particularly those who oppose Israeli policies, while offering milder rebukes to Trump associates who have faced allegations of antisemitism.

This severance of ties between the FBI and the ADL marks a significant shift in the relationship between the two organizations, reflecting the growing polarization in American political discourse and the complexities surrounding issues of extremism and hate.

Source: Original article

Kwatra Engages with Indian Armed Forces Medical Team in Washington

Indian Ambassador Vinay Kwatra recently met with the Armed Forces Medical Services of India in Washington, D.C., to strengthen military medical cooperation between India and the United States.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Indian Ambassador to the United States Vinay Kwatra engaged with the visiting officers of the Armed Forces Medical Services of India during their recent trip to Washington.

In a post on X, Kwatra shared details of his interaction with Surgeon Vice Admiral Arti Sarin and her team. He noted that their visit aimed to foster collaboration with their counterparts at U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM), the Defense Health Agency (DHA), and the Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Kwatra emphasized that enhancing cooperation in military medicine is a vital component of the robust bilateral defense relationship between India and the United States.

Despite ongoing tensions related to trade, the security ties between India and the U.S. have remained resilient. This meeting underscores the commitment of both nations to strengthen their defense collaboration.

Earlier in September, Ambassador Kwatra met with U.S. Undersecretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby at the Pentagon. Following their discussion, Kwatra described the meeting as productive, highlighting the importance of reviewing current agendas and establishing actionable paths for various initiatives in India-U.S. defense cooperation. He praised Colby for his deep knowledge and consistent support for their strategic partnership.

Colby also acknowledged the significance of their meeting, expressing his enthusiasm for continuing to enhance defense cooperation with India.

These diplomatic interactions come shortly after the conclusion of the 21st edition of Exercise Yudh Abhyas 2025, an annual bilateral Army-to-Army exercise between India and the United States, which took place in Alaska. The exercise wrapped up on September 14 after two weeks of intensive training.

In a statement released on September 15, the Indian embassy in Washington characterized the exercises as a hallmark of the growing military-to-military interaction between the two nations, aligning with the Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership established between India and the U.S.

As both countries continue to navigate complex geopolitical landscapes, their commitment to strengthening military ties remains a focal point of their relationship.

Source: Original article

Federal Government Shutdown Fuels Political Blame Game in Governor’s Race

The federal government shutdown has intensified the blame game between gubernatorial candidates Jack Ciattarelli and Rep. Mikie Sherrill in New Jersey’s crucial 2025 election.

As the federal government faces its first shutdown in seven years, the political fallout is reverberating beyond Washington, D.C., and into the New Jersey gubernatorial race. This election is one of only two gubernatorial contests taking place in the United States in 2025, making it a focal point for both parties.

Republican nominee Jack Ciattarelli has seized the opportunity to criticize his Democratic opponent, Rep. Mikie Sherrill, in a recent exclusive interview with Fox News Digital. The verbal sparring began when Sherrill, a four-term congresswoman, accused “Washington Republicans” of prioritizing loyalty to former President Donald Trump over the needs of the American people. In response, Ciattarelli quipped that Sherrill would blame Trump for anything, even a flat tire.

“There’s nothing my opponent won’t blame on President Trump,” Ciattarelli said. “As I like to say, if you get a flat [tire] today, it’s President Trump’s fault.” His comments came after he participated in a candidate forum hosted by Fairleigh Dickinson University.

The government shutdown, which commenced early Wednesday morning, has been a contentious issue, with neither side willing to compromise. Democrats are insisting that any agreement to end the shutdown must include an extension of tax credits for the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which are set to expire soon. These credits are vital for millions of Americans who rely on them to afford healthcare.

On the other hand, many Republicans oppose the extension, arguing that it would lead to increased taxpayer-funded healthcare for undocumented immigrants. Sherrill, along with nearly all House Democrats, voted against a Republican stopgap measure that could have temporarily averted the shutdown. Ciattarelli pointed to her vote as evidence of her unwillingness to collaborate with bipartisan efforts to keep the government running.

“I do know that there’s a bipartisan group of congresspeople that are trying to keep the government open,” Ciattarelli stated. “My opponent has decided not to be part of that bipartisan group, and she voted no. And so here we are.”

Sherrill has consistently linked Ciattarelli to Trump, asserting that the shutdown is a direct result of the former president’s influence over the Republican Party. In a social media post, she stated, “This is precisely the extreme MAGA agenda that @Jack4NJ wants to bring to NJ.”

As Election Day approaches, Sherrill holds a slight lead over Ciattarelli in recent polling. A Fox News survey indicates that she is ahead by single digits, a margin that could shift as the candidates prepare for their second and final debate next week.

Ciattarelli, a former state lawmaker and certified public accountant, remains optimistic about his campaign. He noted that endorsements from Democratic mayors across New Jersey reflect a desire for change among voters. “The energy is off the charts,” he asserted.

In the upcoming debate, Ciattarelli plans to focus on specific policy proposals aimed at addressing New Jersey’s challenges. He expressed his intention to highlight instances where Sherrill fails to answer questions directly.

Meanwhile, the race has been further complicated by revelations regarding Sherrill’s military records. A report indicated that she was barred from participating in her 1994 graduation from the United States Naval Academy due to a cheating scandal. Sherrill has accused Ciattarelli of conducting a “witch hunt” over her military records, which were improperly released to a Ciattarelli ally.

Ciattarelli’s campaign has called on Sherrill to clarify the circumstances surrounding her graduation. “He has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar, if you will,” Sherrill said, referring to Ciattarelli’s campaign tactics. “He’s now trying to divert from that.”

The National Archives recently apologized for the improper release of Sherrill’s military records, attributing the error to a government worker’s mistake. Following the breach, Sherrill’s campaign issued cease-and-desist letters to the National Archives and Ciattarelli’s campaign.

In response to the controversy, Ciattarelli maintained that Sherrill’s past actions at the Naval Academy warrant scrutiny. “She needs to come clean on what she did to be punished by the Naval Academy,” he stated.

As both candidates gear up for the final stretch of the campaign, the interplay of national issues, personal attacks, and local concerns will shape the narrative leading to the polls. With early voting set to begin on October 25, the stakes are high for both Ciattarelli and Sherrill as they vie for the governorship of New Jersey.

Source: Original article

Trump Open to Talks with Kim Jong Un Amid Missile Concerns

President Trump remains open to unconditional talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, as South Korea warns that North Korea’s missiles could reach the U.S. mainland.

The White House has confirmed that President Donald Trump is willing to engage in discussions with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un “without any preconditions.” This statement comes amid warnings from South Korea that North Korea’s missile capabilities could potentially reach the U.S. mainland.

A White House official emphasized that Trump, during his first term, held three significant summits with Kim that contributed to stabilizing the Korean Peninsula. “U.S. policy on North Korea has not changed,” the official stated. “President Trump remains open to talking with Kim Jong Un, without any preconditions.”

South Korean Unification Minister Chung Dong-young made a stark assertion in Berlin this week, indicating that North Korea has become one of the few nations capable of launching an attack on the U.S. mainland. “What needs to be acknowledged should be acknowledged rationally,” he told reporters, as reported by the Yonhap News Agency. The White House did not respond to requests for comment regarding Chung’s claims.

Chung also noted that North Korea’s “strategic position is different” now compared to 2018, when Trump and Kim held their first summit in Singapore. “Acknowledging this reality should be the starting point” in addressing the regime, he added.

Experts have long suggested that North Korea possesses the capability to reach the U.S. mainland with intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). Bob Peters, a senior research fellow for strategic deterrence at the Heritage Foundation, stated, “They’ve tested ICBMs for a long time.” However, he pointed out that the critical question remains whether North Korea has developed a warhead capable of being accurately delivered by an ICBM.

Meanwhile, Kim Jong Un has indicated that dialogue with the U.S. is possible, but only on his terms. “If the United States drops the absurd obsession with denuclearizing us and accepts reality, and wants genuine peaceful coexistence, there is no reason for us not to sit down with the United States,” Kim was quoted as saying by state media.

A potential meeting with Kim would mark Trump’s fourth encounter with the North Korean leader, occurring at a time when relations between the two nations have become increasingly strained. In July, the White House reiterated that Trump “remains open to engaging with Leader Kim to achieve a fully denuclearized North Korea.” However, North Korea has made it clear that it will not engage with the U.S. if denuclearization is a precondition.

On Monday, North Korean Vice Foreign Minister Kim Son Gyong addressed the United Nations General Assembly, asserting that his country will never abandon its nuclear program, according to reports from Reuters.

Trump is set to travel to Asia later this month for an economic leaders’ summit with South Korean President Lee Jae-myung. A senior U.S. official indicated that there are currently no plans for a meeting in the Demilitarized Zone with Kim. However, reports suggest that Trump may meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, scheduled for October 30 to November 1. Plans for this meeting are still being finalized.

In a recent call, Xi extended an invitation to Trump and First Lady Melania Trump to visit China, which Trump reciprocated. The U.S. official noted that any progress on nuclear negotiations would depend significantly on China. “The first thing that would need to happen is for the Chinese to acknowledge and be more transparent about its own programs,” the official stated.

Current U.S. estimates suggest that China’s nuclear arsenal may consist of approximately 600 warheads by 2024, with projections reaching 1,000 by 2030. In contrast, North Korea is believed to possess around 50 warheads, with sufficient fissile material for up to 90.

Last year, North Korea declared an “irreversible hegemonic position” following the test-firing of its Hwasong-19 intercontinental ballistic missile, which the regime claims can strike the American mainland. As tensions rise, Trump is reinforcing deterrence while keeping the door open for “talks without preconditions.”

Source: Original article

Nearly Half of Fortune 500 Companies Founded by Immigrants or Their Children

Nearly half of the Fortune 500 companies in 2025 were founded by immigrants or their children, generating significant revenue and employment opportunities across the United States.

WASHINGTON, DC, August 21, 2025 — A recent analysis of the 2025 Fortune 500 list reveals that 46.2 percent of America’s largest companies, or 231 out of 500, were founded by immigrants or their children. These companies collectively generated an impressive $8.6 trillion in revenue during the fiscal year 2024 and employed over 15.4 million people worldwide. This data highlights the crucial role that immigrants play in fostering innovation, driving economic growth, and creating jobs in the United States.

This figure represents the highest level recorded since the American Immigration Council began tracking immigrant entrepreneurs in its annual reviews of the Fortune 500 list in 2011.

“Immigrants are a driving force behind America’s prosperity. We need immigration policies that reflect that, instead of investing billions of dollars into detention, deportation, and making it incredibly difficult for foreign workers to come here or even renew their visas. These reckless policies undermine America’s greatest competitive advantage: the talent and drive of immigrants,” said Nan Wu, director of research at the American Immigration Council.

Companies founded by immigrants or their children have significantly transformed various industries, including technology, retail, and media. Notable names on the list include Amazon, Apple, NVIDIA, Levi Strauss & Co., Ace Hardware, and Sirius XM Holdings.

Key findings from the analysis indicate that these Fortune 500 companies, established by immigrants or their descendants, generated $8.6 trillion in revenue during fiscal year 2024. This revenue, if compared to national GDPs, would rank as the third-largest economy globally.

Moreover, these companies employed over 15.4 million individuals worldwide, a workforce comparable to the population of the fifth-largest U.S. state. Immigrants and their children founded 80 percent of the Fortune 500 companies in professional and other services, 65.6 percent in manufacturing, and 57.5 percent in information technology.

Among the 14 companies that made their debut on the Fortune 500 list this year, 10 were founded by immigrants or their children.

“Immigrants built nearly half of our Fortune 500 companies, created millions of jobs, and keep our economy competitive. And yet U.S. political leaders are making it increasingly difficult for foreign talent to come here or stay. It’s economic self-sabotage. If we want to stay the world’s innovation leader, we should be welcoming immigrants, not attacking them,” stated Steve Hubbard, senior data scientist at the American Immigration Council.

The American Immigration Council has experts available to provide further insights into the benefits that immigrants contribute to the U.S. economy at both national and state levels.

Source: Original article

Vandalism of Gandhi Statue in London Provokes Diplomatic Response

India has condemned the vandalism of a Mahatma Gandhi statue in London, calling for immediate action and highlighting the incident’s disrespectful nature ahead of Gandhi’s upcoming birth anniversary.

The Indian government has expressed outrage following the defacement of a statue of Mahatma Gandhi in London, demanding immediate action against the perpetrators. The Indian High Commission labeled the act as “shameful,” describing it as a violent affront to Gandhi’s enduring philosophy of nonviolence.

The statue, located in Tavistock Square, was unveiled in 1968 to commemorate Gandhi’s time as a law student at University College London. The recent vandalism involved graffiti that included the word “Terrorists” painted on the statue’s base, along with references to “Gandhi, Modi and Hindustani [Indians].” Local authorities are treating the incident as “racially aggravated.” As of now, no arrests have been reported in connection with the case.

In response to the vandalism, Camden Council has dispatched teams to clean the statue, while the Metropolitan Police have initiated a criminal damage investigation. The Indian mission has stated that its representatives are on-site, coordinating efforts to restore the monument’s dignity.

The timing of this incident is particularly sensitive, occurring just days before Gandhi’s 156th birth anniversary on October 2, which also coincides with the International Day of Non-Violence. Traditionally, the statue serves as a focal point for tributes on this day, with floral offerings and hymns often placed at its base.

This is not the first time Gandhi’s likeness has been targeted. In 2014, a statue in Leicester was similarly vandalized. In recent years, there have been ongoing debates in parts of the U.K. regarding the removal of Gandhi monuments.

The Indian government is pressing U.K. authorities for a thorough investigation and swift action to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future, underscoring the need for respect toward historical figures and their legacies.

Source: Original article

Republicans Propose Amendment to Withhold Lawmakers’ Pay During Shutdowns

Lawmakers are advocating for a constitutional amendment that would suspend pay for federal legislators during government shutdowns, emphasizing accountability in Congress.

In a move aimed at increasing accountability among federal lawmakers, Representative Ralph Norman, a Republican from South Carolina, has reintroduced a proposal for a constitutional amendment that would dock the pay of Congress members during government shutdowns. Norman announced the initiative on Tuesday, highlighting the disparity between the financial struggles of federal workers and the continued paychecks received by Congress members during such crises.

“During shutdowns, federal workers are told to ‘do more with less.’ Meanwhile, Congress still cashes paychecks. That’s wrong,” Norman stated in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. He emphasized that his proposed amendment would eliminate pay for lawmakers during shutdowns, with no provision for back pay once the government resumes operations.

Norman’s proposal has garnered support from several Republican colleagues, including Representatives Bob Latta of Ohio, Jack Bergman of Michigan, Eli Crane of Arizona, Cory Mills of Florida, Dusty Johnson of South Dakota, and John Joyce of Pennsylvania, who have all signed on as cosponsors.

The text of the proposed amendment reads: “Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), that the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification.” This resolution aims to ensure that lawmakers do not receive compensation during periods of government shutdowns.

The amendment specifies that a government shutdown is defined as a lapse in appropriations for any federal agency or department due to the failure to enact a regular appropriations bill or continuing resolution. It also grants Congress the authority to enforce this article through appropriate legislation.

The urgency of this proposal comes as the nation braces for a partial government shutdown, which is set to take effect on Wednesday. Both Republicans and Democrats have been exchanging blame for the impasse, failing to reach an agreement to avert a funding lapse by the impending deadline.

<p”Members of Congress have a constitutional duty to fund the government’s essential functions,” Norman remarked in a press release. “If Congress fails to meet that obligation, we should not expect taxpayers to continue paying us for inaction. No one else in America would get paid for failing to fulfill their duties—Congress should face the same principle.”

As discussions continue in Washington, the proposal reflects a growing sentiment among some lawmakers that accountability measures are necessary to ensure that Congress is held responsible for its actions, particularly during times of fiscal uncertainty.

In addition to his legislative efforts, Norman is also running for governor of South Carolina, further emphasizing his commitment to public service and accountability.

Source: Original article

Italy’s Meloni Warns Gaza Flotilla Could Escalate Conflict and Ceasefire Risks

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has criticized a Gaza-bound flotilla, warning it could escalate tensions and jeopardize peace efforts led by former President Donald Trump.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has condemned a Gaza-bound flotilla, which includes anti-Israel activists and notable figures such as Greta Thunberg. Her remarks come as Israel prepares for potential escalations in the ongoing conflict, raising concerns that the flotilla could undermine Donald Trump’s peace initiative.

Meloni asserted that the flotilla aims to disrupt Trump’s peace plan, stating on social media platform X, “The truth is simple: those aids can be delivered without risks. Insisting on wanting to force a naval blockade means making oneself—knowingly or not—an instrument of those who want to blow up every possibility of a ceasefire. Spare us the lesson in morality on peace if your goal is escalation. And do not exploit the civilian population of Gaza if you are not truly interested in their fate.”

The Trump administration has introduced a 20-point plan aimed at ending the conflict in Gaza and facilitating the release of Israeli hostages. However, the flotilla’s actions could redirect the narrative from diplomatic efforts back toward confrontation.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar echoed Meloni’s sentiments, stating on X, “The flotilla to Gaza is not a humanitarian act, but a dangerous provocation intended to inflame tensions and undermine ongoing diplomatic efforts.”

The Global Sumud Flotilla, which describes itself as a “multinational civilian effort to break Israel’s illegal siege of Gaza,” claims this is the largest attempt to breach Israel’s maritime blockade of the Gaza Strip, which has been in place for 18 years. Israel maintains that the blockade is essential for preventing Hamas from acquiring arms.

The flotilla is currently navigating waters within Israel’s exclusive economic zone and is expected to reach Israeli waters around Yom Kippur. It comprises nearly 50 vessels and hundreds of anti-Israel activists. In preparation, Israel has deployed 600 police officers and naval units, establishing a special court at Ktzi’ot Prison to process potential detainees. Security officials have warned of possible provocations at sea, with a senior Israeli police officer stating, “This is a sensitive and complex operation, and we are preparing for provocations.”

The flotilla has garnered international attention not only due to Thunberg’s involvement but also because of its connections across Europe and the region. The fleet departed from Barcelona, with activists supported by groups in Spain, which Israeli authorities allege have ties to Hamas operative Saif Abu Kashk. He is accused of running a front company that allegedly controls many of the ships involved in the flotilla.

Additionally, Turkey has been monitoring the flotilla with drones and has indicated it may offer assistance on humanitarian grounds. However, Turkey has faced accusations of providing shelter to Hamas members within its borders.

For Israel, the challenge lies in preventing the activists from reaching Gaza while avoiding an international incident that could benefit Hamas. As Trump seeks to solidify a peace deal, the impending confrontation at sea threatens to shift media focus away from diplomatic discussions and back toward conflict.

On Tuesday, Israeli officials released documents linking the flotilla’s organizers to Hamas through the Palestinian Conference for Palestinians Abroad (PCPA). This group, established in Turkey in 2017, has been designated a terrorist organization by Israel and is accused of acting as Hamas’s overseas arm.

Source: Original article

Democratic Gubernatorial Nominee Faces Nepotism Accusations Over Children’s Naval Academy Acceptance

New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill faces accusations of nepotism following the acceptance of her children into the U.S. Naval Academy amid ongoing controversies surrounding her military past.

New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill is under scrutiny for alleged nepotism after two of her children were nominated and subsequently accepted into the U.S. Naval Academy. This controversy emerges as Sherrill is also dealing with a separate issue related to a cheating scandal during her own time at the academy.

In a June press release, Sherrill expressed pride in the 24 students from her district who were appointed to various military academies, including her children, Lincoln and Margaret Hedberg. However, the press release did not explicitly identify the two students with her husband’s last name as her children, and a photo accompanying the release did not feature them.

“From my time at the Naval Academy, I remember how challenging the academy’s programs are—both academically and physically,” Sherrill stated in the release. She emphasized the importance of teamwork and overcoming challenges, which she believes prepared her for leadership roles as a military officer. Sherrill wished the best for the young men and women starting their careers as future military leaders.

Members of Congress are responsible for nominating students to service academies, while the academies make the final appointments based on qualifications. Social media users have raised concerns about the fairness of Sherrill’s children’s admissions, particularly since only 22 students from her district were accepted into military academies, with just nine gaining entry to the Naval Academy. The academy is known for its highly competitive admissions process, boasting a mere 9% acceptance rate.

Rasmussen pollster Mark Mitchell took to social media to voice his concerns, stating, “Mikie Sherrill’s two kids are at the Naval Academy, one of the hardest schools to get into, because of her nepotism. Meanwhile, some hardworking, impoverished, and unconnected teenagers lose out on a life dream they earned.”

Journalist Jennifer Jean Miller echoed these sentiments, questioning how Sherrill’s children gained admission while potentially deserving candidates were overlooked. “Far left politicians like Mikie Sherrill like to virtue signal about privilege…yet have no problem exerting their own privilege,” she remarked.

While some have claimed that Sherrill nominated her children, an aide for Democratic Senator Cory Booker confirmed to Fox News Digital that Booker nominated one of Sherrill’s children for the current freshman class. “Each year, Senator Booker, as a member of Congress, has the honor of nominating qualified young people to serve in the United States military service academies,” Booker’s office stated. They emphasized that prospective candidates undergo a rigorous application and screening process to ensure that only the best candidates are recommended based on merit.

Sherrill’s other child received a nomination from now-former Democratic Senator George Helmy, as confirmed by a Helmy spokesperson. In response to the nepotism allegations, Sherrill clarified that her children did not participate in her office’s nomination process to avoid any appearance of conflict of interest. “Instead, they applied to the offices of the U.S. Senators from New Jersey, who also run academy nomination processes each year, and I am proud that they each earned nominations on their own,” she stated.

Sherrill’s office explained that the press release did not include her children because it listed all students from NJ-11 who were appointed to academies, not just those she nominated, which is considered routine for her office.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Sherrill’s campaign described the nepotism accusations as a “depraved attack.” They alleged that the Trump administration, in collaboration with the Ciattarelli campaign, released Sherrill’s unredacted service records, including sensitive personal information, and are now resorting to attacks on her family.

Federal law allows members of Congress to nominate up to 15 candidates for each available vacancy at the U.S. Naval Academy, with each member permitted to have five constituents attending the academy at any given time.

The political landscape in New Jersey has been tense, particularly as the state prepares for its gubernatorial election, one of only two nationwide this year. The race intensified last week when reports surfaced that the Naval Academy had barred Sherrill from participating in her 1994 graduation due to a cheating scandal.

Sherrill’s opponent, Jack Ciattarelli, has called for her to release her military records to clarify the circumstances surrounding her graduation. “What we learned today is that she was part of it in some way, shape or form. Come clean, release the records. Tell us what’s in your disciplinary records. I think the people of New Jersey deserve that,” Ciattarelli stated during an interview.

Adding to the controversy, a report revealed that the National Personnel Records Center mistakenly released Sherrill’s improperly redacted military personnel files, which contained private information, to an ally of Ciattarelli. This incident has prompted calls from prominent Democrats for an investigation into the matter.

Sherrill expressed her outrage, stating, “To have a guy I’m running against, it will stop at nothing, it will stop at nothing, who will illegally obtain records. It’s just beyond the pale.”

The two candidates are set to face off in their second and final debate next week as they vie for the position of governor, succeeding term-limited Democratic Governor Phil Murphy.

Source: Original article

US Considers Weighted Selection Process for H-1B 2027 Season

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is proposing a weighted selection process for the H-1B lottery, prioritizing higher-paid and skilled applicants, which could limit opportunities for lower-wage roles.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced a significant change to the H-1B visa lottery process, as detailed in a notice published in the Federal Register on September 24. The proposed “weighted selection process” aims to prioritize foreign workers who command higher salaries and possess advanced skills, marking a potential shift in how H-1B visas are allocated for the 2027 season.

Under the current system, employers must complete an online registration for each foreign national they wish to sponsor under the cap-subject category. In this arrangement, U.S. employers act as petitioners, while the foreign workers they aim to hire are considered beneficiaries. After all registrations are submitted, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) conducts a random lottery to select from the eligible beneficiaries.

Once a beneficiary is chosen in the lottery, all U.S. employers who submitted registrations for that individual receive a selection notice, allowing them to file an H-1B cap-subject petition on behalf of the selected worker.

The DHS’s proposed revision seeks to move away from a purely random lottery system to one that incorporates additional criteria, thereby creating a weighted approach. This new method is designed to incentivize employers to offer higher salaries and to sponsor positions that require advanced expertise, thereby aligning visa selections more closely with roles that reflect elevated wage levels.

Central to this proposed system is the Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) wage level, which would determine how petitions are weighted. The selection process would prioritize petitions based on the highest wage level that the offered salary meets or exceeds, taking into account the relevant Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code and the location of employment.

In practice, this means that USCIS would first review registrations at OEWS wage level IV, then proceed to levels III, II, and finally I. The term “proffered wage” refers to the salary an employer commits to paying the selected worker, emphasizing the importance of compensation in the selection process.

Each year, the H-1B program allocates 85,000 visas for specialty occupations, with 20,000 of those reserved for individuals holding advanced degrees from U.S. institutions. The proposed weighted selection process aims to direct these limited slots toward candidates with superior skills, qualifications, or compensation, rather than distributing them to lower-paid or less-skilled positions.

As a result of this new framework, securing visas for lower-wage or less-skilled roles could become increasingly challenging. Additionally, the introduction of a $100,000 petition fee presents a significant financial hurdle, compelling companies to carefully assess whether the costs align with their hiring strategies. Together, the increased fees and the proposed weighted selection system could fundamentally alter the landscape of the H-1B visa program.

Experts suggest that the likelihood of implementing this weighted selection process is high, indicating a substantial shift in the H-1B visa allocation strategy. If adopted, these changes could reshape the dynamics of the U.S. labor market, particularly in sectors that traditionally rely on lower-wage foreign workers.

As the DHS continues to refine its proposals, stakeholders in the immigration and employment sectors will be closely monitoring developments regarding the H-1B lottery and its implications for the future of skilled labor in the United States.

Source: Original article

Snapshots from the SALA 2025 Conference Highlight Indian-American Innovations

Bay Area residents celebrated literature and art at the annual SALA 2025 festival, featuring prominent South Asian speakers and a diverse array of discussions and performances.

Bay Area residents enjoyed a vibrant literary weekend at the annual SALA 2025 festival, produced by Art Forum SF on September 13 and 14. The event, which serves as a platform for South Asian literature and arts, attracted a diverse audience eager to engage with contemporary reflections from the subcontinent and its diaspora.

This year’s theme, “Thoughts Without Borders,” highlighted over 24 panel discussions that explored various aspects of literature, art, culinary experiences, and social issues affecting the diaspora. Sobhan Hassanvand of India Currents, a media sponsor of the event, captured the lively atmosphere, filming attendees as they interacted with speakers and enjoyed the festivities.

Among the notable speakers was author Alka Joshi, who participated in a panel titled “Blatant Defiance.” During her discussion with poet Shikha Malaviya, Joshi shared insights into her inspiration and research process for her latest historical fiction novel, Six Days in Bombay. The conversation delved into the life of Amrita Sher-Gil, a pioneering Indian painter, and questioned whether her life was curtailed by her artistic ambitions or the unconventional lifestyle she led in the 1930s across India and Europe.

The festival also featured a variety of food trucks, art and creative writing workshops, book signings, and poetry readings, creating an engaging environment for attendees. Authors had the opportunity to sign copies of their works in the Florence Moore Courtyard, where Joshi expressed her belief in the potential of young people to effect positive change through storytelling. “Young people have so much potential to make this world a better place, to make this world a more accepting place,” she remarked. “One of the ways they can do that is by writing about their history as well as the future that they hope for in this world.”

Another highlight of the festival was a conversation featuring renowned mythologist and author Devdutt Pattanaik, moderated by Dr. Anjali Arondekar, a leading scholar in Feminist Studies. Pattanaik discussed his approach to reinterpreting ancient Indian stories for contemporary audiences, weaving together themes of culture, leadership, and identity.

Acclaimed poet and artist Imtiaz Dharker also participated in the festival, engaging in a thought-provoking discussion with poet Arundhathi Subramaniam. Dharker reflected on her experiences with language, art, and displacement, emphasizing the importance of platforms like SALA in fostering connections among diverse voices. “What SALA is doing is they’re bringing in all kinds of people to listen and to share art, literature, poetry,” Dharker stated. “They are the language of being human, how we live in this world. They give us roots into how we’re going to live.”

SALA 2025 successfully brought together a community of artists, writers, and enthusiasts, celebrating the richness of South Asian culture and its contributions to the global literary landscape. The festival not only showcased established voices but also provided a space for emerging talent to share their stories and perspectives.

As the festival concluded, attendees left with a renewed appreciation for the power of literature and art to bridge cultural divides and inspire dialogue. SALA 2025 reaffirmed its role as a vital platform for exploring the complexities of identity and creativity within the South Asian diaspora.

Source: Original article

Elon Musk Supports Leader of New UK Right-Wing Party

Elon Musk has re-entered British politics by endorsing the new right-wing party Advance UK and criticizing Nigel Farage, amid growing voter dissatisfaction with current political leadership.

Elon Musk has made a notable return to British politics, this time endorsing the newly formed right-wing party, Advance UK, while taking aim at Nigel Farage, the leader of the influential Reform UK party. Musk’s involvement comes at a time of increasing voter frustration with the current political landscape.

In a recent post on X, Musk urged his followers to support Advance UK, led by Ben Habib and Tommy Robinson, stating, “Go with @_AdvanceUK, Ben [Habib] and Tommy [Robinson] for the real change that’s needed to save Britain!” He further criticized Farage, labeling him as “weak sauce” and asserting that Advance UK would be the party to drive real change.

Musk’s engagement in British politics was highlighted earlier this month when he addressed tens of thousands of attendees at the “Unite the Kingdom” rally, organized by Robinson. Joining the event via video link, Musk condemned the left as “the party of murder” and expressed his belief that significant government reform is necessary in Britain. He emphasized that the people should have control rather than a detached bureaucracy.

Advance UK, which is close to gaining official registration, is led by Ben Habib, a former co-deputy chairman of Reform UK. Habib has voiced his belief that the traditional two-party system in Britain is no longer viable, stating, “The Conservatives and Labour Party have had their chance, and now the people want something new.” However, some political analysts question whether this new system can produce a majority government or a viable opposition party.

Alan Mendoza, executive director of the Henry Jackson Society think tank, noted the fragmentation of British politics, which has been fueled by widespread dissatisfaction with political leaders. Polling data from YouGov indicates that Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, and Farage all have unfavorable ratings ranging from 52% to 68%.

Despite Farage’s negative perception, recent polling from Ipsos suggests that Reform UK leads in hypothetical general election scenarios. However, Mendoza cautioned that the timing of the next election remains uncertain, making predictions difficult. “The golden law of British politics is you can’t predict the vote that far ahead,” he remarked.

When questioned about the necessity of Advance UK given Reform UK’s polling strength, Habib criticized Farage’s party as lacking substance. “Reform will not deliver. It stands for nothing. It is a populist party without a political philosophy and without intellectual heft or capability,” he stated, asserting that Farage’s patriotic image is merely a façade.

Despite the potential for Advance UK to attract voters disillusioned with Reform UK, Mendoza suggested that Robinson’s involvement could be detrimental. The recent rally saw some protestors allegedly clashing with police, which could alienate potential supporters. “Most people will not like violence at a political rally,” Mendoza noted.

Voter frustration is particularly pronounced regarding immigration policies, as neither the current government nor its predecessor has effectively addressed the rising tide of legal and illegal immigration. Government data reveals that nearly 50,000 undocumented immigrants, many seeking asylum, arrived in Britain in the year leading up to June, an increase from approximately 39,000 the previous year. The Daily Telegraph reported that migrants now account for 98% of the latest population increase, with the Office for National Statistics estimating that 69.3 million people were living in the country by mid-2024.

Habib has called for a comprehensive approach to immigration reform, advocating for stricter border enforcement and the deportation of illegal migrants. He highlighted the financial burden of housing asylum seekers, who are currently accommodated in hotels at a cost of £5.8 million per day ($7.4 million) to taxpayers.

Earlier this summer, protests erupted in Epping, southeast England, over the use of hotels for asylum seekers. In a separate incident, Farage suspended one of his local councilors over accusations of racism during the demonstrations. Musk responded to this suspension on X, criticizing Farage for failing to defend his party members and asserting that he would not bring about significant political change.

Public sentiment in the U.K. indicates a desire for substantial change, particularly regarding issues of free speech. Earlier this year, incidents involving armed police confronting individuals over online comments about transgender issues have raised concerns about civil liberties.

Despite Musk’s criticisms, a recent YouGov poll suggests that Farage’s Reform UK could achieve a significant victory over Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour Party if an election were held soon. Farage himself acknowledged the rapid growth of his party, stating, “The growth of the party has been astonishing,” and asserting that they are “now coming for Labour.”

As the political landscape in the U.K. continues to evolve, the impact of Musk’s endorsement and the emergence of Advance UK will be closely watched by both supporters and critics alike.

Source: Original article

Former Surgeon General Vivek Murthy Discusses Future of Healthcare in the U.S.

Dr. Vivek Murthy discusses the future of healthcare in the U.S., emphasizing the roles of AI, health policy, and social connections in shaping public health.

Dr. Vivek Murthy, who served as the 19th and 21st Surgeon General of the United States, holds the distinction of being the only member of the Indian Diaspora to have held this position twice. In a recent interview with Mandayam Osuri Thirunarayanan for India Currents, Dr. Murthy shared insights on how artificial intelligence, health policy, and the issue of loneliness will influence the future of healthcare in the country.

This interview has been edited for clarity and conciseness.

Reflecting on his time as the ‘Nation’s Doctor,’ Dr. Murthy described the variety of experiences he encountered daily. “Every day was different,” he said. “On some days, I could be in Washington, D.C., meeting with colleagues and collaborators throughout the Department of Health and Human Services at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).”

He also noted that his responsibilities included engaging with legislators on Capitol Hill regarding critical public health issues and policy measures. “I spent time internally working with our team to prepare advisories and reports and to design campaigns that would help advance public health causes,” he added.

When asked about the impact of the Surgeon General’s office on health policy and legislation, Dr. Murthy explained, “The Surgeon General’s Office doesn’t create laws or issue funding. It works directly with communities on public health education and with lawmakers to inform policy.” He emphasized that the public health priorities set by the office often help shape public understanding and influence policy decisions at various levels.

Dr. Murthy’s extensive travels across the United States and abroad have significantly informed his work. “My team and I traveled a lot and visited communities all across America, and even outside of America, in Japan, India, and the United Kingdom,” he said. He highlighted the importance of listening to communities during town halls, church gatherings, and school visits, which led to advisories and public health campaigns grounded in scientific evidence.

Among the notable campaigns he referenced were those addressing youth mental health and the epidemic of loneliness and isolation. “Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on the Healing Effects of Social Connection and Community” was particularly impactful, he noted.

As for the role of artificial intelligence and robotics in healthcare, Dr. Murthy expressed both optimism and caution. “Artificial intelligence is already changing health care as well as scientific research and discovery,” he stated. He acknowledged the benefits AI brings to the healthcare system but also stressed the importance of managing its risks. “AI and robots could have a negative impact on social interactions,” he warned, emphasizing that human empathy and care cannot be replicated by machines.

Dr. Murthy elaborated on the limitations of AI, stating, “Algorithm-based AI and robots can never substitute for human beings. They can augment our lives, but they never fully replace our friends, family, and the people who care for us.” He underscored the value of human imperfection in relationships, noting that AI cannot replicate the authenticity of human interactions.

When discussing loneliness, Dr. Murthy acknowledged that while AI might serve as a social coach or prompt individuals to reach out to loved ones, it should never replace genuine human interaction.

Reflecting on his major accomplishments as Surgeon General, Dr. Murthy expressed pride in broadening the understanding of health beyond just physical aspects. “We expanded that notion to include mental, social, and spiritual dimensions of health,” he explained. He emphasized the importance of mental health and social relationships, highlighting the Surgeon General’s Advisory on loneliness and isolation as a significant contribution to public health discourse.

Dr. Murthy also discussed the challenges he faced in his role, particularly the difficulty of prioritizing health issues amid limited resources. “With limited time and resources, we chose to focus our efforts on health issues that were not being addressed and where there was little public awareness,” he said. Navigating the diverse stakeholders involved in public health was another challenge he encountered, including federal agencies, Congress members, community groups, and healthcare providers.

For the Indian Diaspora, Dr. Murthy offered essential health advice, emphasizing the importance of prevention. He outlined five pillars for disease prevention: sleep, social connection, stress reduction, nutrition, and physical activity. He stressed the need for quality sleep, the value of maintaining close friendships, and the importance of managing stress in today’s fast-paced world.

In terms of nutrition, Dr. Murthy advised minimizing ultra-processed foods and focusing on balanced diets. He also highlighted the benefits of regular physical activity, such as walking and resistance exercises, in promoting overall health.

“These five pillars can do a lot to help reduce our risk of cardiac disease, cancer, diabetes, and other illnesses,” he concluded. “They can also improve how we feel.”

Source: Original article

Author Manu S. Pillai Discusses Politics of History at SALA 2025

Young historian Manu S. Pillai shared insights on the complexities of Indian history and the role of contemporary perspectives during a panel discussion at SALA 2025.

Manu S. Pillai, a prominent historian and author, has garnered attention for his ability to reimagine Indian history through engaging storytelling and modern interpretations of power and empire. At the South Asian Literature and Art Festival (SALA) 2025, Pillai participated in a panel discussion with author and journalist Salil Tripathi, where they explored the intricacies of history and the challenges faced by historians today.

The session began with a light-hearted exchange, as Tripathi suggested that Pillai was mischaracterized as “one of India’s best young historians,” arguing instead that he should be recognized simply as “one of India’s best historians.” Pillai, in his mid-30s, found the label somewhat irritating, reflecting on how he would likely view this moment of youthful frustration in the years to come.

The humor that characterized the opening of the discussion continued throughout the session, which was filled with valuable insights and advice for younger generations interested in history.

During the conversation, Tripathi raised the question of whether rational discussions about history are even possible in today’s context. Pillai recounted his experience following the publication of his first book, The Ivory Throne (HarperCollins, 2016), which led to a defamation lawsuit from the royal family of Travancore. They objected to his portrayal of the Maharaja, who was revered as “Pratyaksha Padmanabhan,” an embodiment of the deity Vishnu. Despite the legal pushback, the family’s lawyers humorously noted their enjoyment of the book.

Pillai noted that such hypersensitivity is not uncommon in contemporary India, where he has faced backlash for referring to historical figures like Shivaji without the customary honorifics. He emphasized the importance of understanding people rather than judging them, while also advocating for historians to engage with younger audiences through social media, given its growing influence over traditional reading habits.

As the discussion progressed, Pillai highlighted how different generations interpret history through their unique lenses. He argued that the disdain some hold for historians can be countered by avoiding the temptation to “whitewash” the past. He acknowledged the historical presence of violence and strife, but also pointed out that places of worship often served as centers of commerce and peace. For example, while Tipu Sultan may have been known for his military actions, he also made offerings to temples, illustrating the complexity of historical narratives.

Tripathi noted that attacks on historical narratives are not limited to India, citing examples from the United States, where critical race theory and exhibits at institutions like the Smithsonian have faced scrutiny. Pillai agreed, expressing relief that this struggle between memory and history is a global issue, and he remarked on the inevitability of human folly in the repetition of history.

Pillai expressed a fascination with the “mixed-up element of history,” sharing anecdotes from Maharashtra, where he grew up. He mentioned historical figures like Malik Ambar, a black military slave who married local women, and the presence of black queens in the region during the 16th and 17th centuries. He also touched on the influence of Chinese culture in India, noting how common items bear Chinese names, and shared a personal revelation from a DNA test that traced his ancestry back to a Malayali Christian.

His latest book, Gods, Guns and Missionaries (Penguin Random House / Allen Lane, 2025), distinguishes between Hindu thought, Hinduism, and Hindutva. Pillai explained how religious practices evolve under various influences, highlighting the ongoing changes in Islam and Hinduism in contemporary India.

When an audience member questioned the assertion that “there was no India before 1947,” Pillai referenced William Dalrymple’s recent work, The Golden Road: How Ancient India Transformed the World. He clarified that while the term “India” may not have existed, there was a shared cultural zone that connected various regions.

Pillai offered sage advice on the importance of speaking truth to power and cultivating diverse reading habits. He urged young readers to avoid relying solely on social media for information, encouraging them to read widely and critically. “Never swallow or believe everything you’re told,” he advised, emphasizing the importance of questioning and critical thinking.

He also discussed the fear that those in power often have of comedians, noting that when people cannot take a joke, they resort to controlling narratives. Pillai shared examples of resistance through parody, including a Telugu play that humorously critiqued societal norms. He praised regional films, such as The Great Indian Kitchen, for their ability to confront cultural taboos.

In response to concerns about the erosion of rights, Pillai encouraged the audience to “fight small battles every day.” He likened this approach to lighting many small lamps in a dark room, suggesting that while each effort may seem insignificant, together they can create a powerful illumination of change.

Pillai’s insights at SALA 2025 underscored the complexities of history and the importance of engaging with it critically and thoughtfully, particularly in an era where narratives are often contested.

Source: Original article

Portland Mayor Criticizes Federal Intervention Amid Controversial Video Claims

Portland Mayor Keith Wilson has condemned President Trump’s plan to deploy federal troops to the city, asserting that there is no current lawlessness or violence in the area.

Portland Mayor Keith Wilson voiced strong opposition on Saturday to President Donald Trump’s announcement regarding the deployment of federal troops to Oregon’s largest city. The president’s decision comes amid ongoing protests and heightened tensions between federal authorities and local activists.

In a statement made during a news conference, Wilson asserted that there is no need for military intervention in Portland, declaring that the number of troops required is “zero.” He emphasized that the city is not a military target, stating, “This is an American city. We do not need any intervention.”

Trump’s announcement, made early Saturday morning, indicated that he had directed War Secretary Pete Hegseth to provide “all necessary troops to protect war-ravaged Portland, and any of our ICE facilities under siege from attack by Antifa and other domestic terrorists.” The president suggested he would authorize full force if necessary to address what he described as lawlessness.

In response, Wilson criticized the portrayal of Portland as a city in chaos, claiming that video footage of violence being circulated was outdated, stating it was “recycled and then recycled again” from incidents that occurred five years ago. He insisted that if Trump were to visit Portland today, he would see a community engaged in everyday activities such as riding bikes, playing sports, and shopping at local markets.

Wilson highlighted the progress the city has made since the footage was recorded, noting reforms in the public safety system and efforts to support vulnerable populations. “We’ve had hard conversations, and we’ve done important work in the years since that footage was taken,” he said.

Protests have intensified near the ICE facility in Portland since June, with city officials citing land use violations, including improper detainee holding times and boarded-up windows. The facility has been the site of vandalism and clashes between protesters and federal agents, occasionally resulting in violent confrontations. Law enforcement has responded with rubber bullets, tear gas, and flashbangs to disperse crowds during these events.

In August, video footage captured a particularly violent protest, showing demonstrators rolling out a guillotine, setting fires, and clashing with authorities. This incident prompted law enforcement to take action to control the situation.

Rather than sending troops to Portland, Wilson suggested that the president consider dispatching “hundreds of engineers, or teachers, or outreach workers” to the city. He expressed disappointment with the federal government’s approach, stating, “At the end of the day, this may be a show of force, but that’s all it is. It’s a big show, and after the big show, everyone goes home.”

Wilson emphasized Portland’s long-standing tradition of peaceful protest and its commitment to positive social change. He expressed concern over the potential risks associated with the federal intervention, noting that the administration has not clarified what it means by deploying “full force” against the city and its residents.

While Trump did not explicitly state that he would deploy full force against Portland’s citizens, he did mention sending “all necessary troops” to protect the city and its ICE facilities, authorizing full force against domestic terrorism if deemed necessary.

Portland has been designated a sanctuary city since 2017, resisting federal immigration enforcement and becoming a focal point in the administration’s immigration enforcement initiatives. In August, Attorney General Pam Bondi sent a letter to Wilson, warning that the city’s sanctuary policies undermine U.S. interests and demanding compliance with federal law.

The City of Portland did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the situation.

Source: Original article

Trump Agency’s Social Media Reach Exceeds MSNBC, CNN Viewership, DHS Reports

The Department of Homeland Security’s social media reach has significantly surpassed that of MSNBC and CNN, according to recent metrics obtained by Fox News Digital.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reported that its social media reach outperformed that of legacy media outlets MSNBC and CNN during the summer months, with millions of media impressions across various platforms.

Exclusive metrics obtained by Fox News Digital reveal that DHS’s social media accounts, which include channels on Facebook, Instagram, and X, garnered approximately 6,395,700 daily impressions in July. This figure starkly contrasts with the daily viewership numbers for MSNBC and CNN, which averaged about 502,000 and 333,000 viewers, respectively.

In prime time, MSNBC attracted around 738,000 viewers, while CNN’s viewership reached approximately 440,000, according to data from Nielsen Media Research. The previous month, June, also saw DHS outperforming these outlets, with social media impressions totaling roughly 3,390,600. During that time, MSNBC averaged 593,000 daily viewers, and CNN had about 450,000.

The metrics compiled by DHS were derived from internal reports, which were subsequently verified using Sprout Social, a social media management tool. An “impression” is defined as the number of times a post or content appears on a user’s screen, regardless of whether the user engages with it.

DHS has adopted a distinctive approach to its social media strategy, incorporating memes, GIFs, and traditional American-style recruiting graphics to promote U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Sources within DHS indicated that one of their goals is to depict an idealized vision of what an American homeland represents.

This innovative strategy has not only been employed by DHS but has also been mirrored by other government agencies and the White House. Notably, during the Trump administration, DHS experienced a remarkable 34-fold increase in weekly reach compared to the Biden administration. In July 2024, the Biden administration’s DHS reported just 700,000 weekly impressions, while the Trump administration’s DHS, under Secretary Kristi Noem, achieved an impressive 46.1 million impressions.

Despite receiving criticism from some legacy media outlets regarding its social media style, DHS remains committed to its current approach, including the ongoing ICE recruiting campaign. A Washington Post opinion piece even labeled the agency’s videos as “preposterous,” suggesting they were part of a “holy war” to promote their agenda.

As the landscape of media consumption continues to evolve, the Department of Homeland Security’s social media strategy exemplifies a shift in how government agencies engage with the public, aiming to reach audiences where they are most active.

Source: Original article

8th US-India Conference to Address AI, Global Dynamics, and Biomedical Advances

The eighth annual US-India Conference will address the evolving relationship between the two nations, focusing on artificial intelligence, global dynamics, and biomedical advancements.

As the geopolitical and technological landscape shifts rapidly, the eighth annual US-India Conference is set to explore one of the world’s most significant partnerships during a critical moment of reassessment.

The US-India relationship currently stands at a crossroads, balancing strategic pragmatism with shared democratic values. Recent tensions surrounding trade, tariffs, and technology have prompted discussions about whether the partnership is undergoing a recalibration or simply cooling. This year’s conference, titled US India: Normalization or Reset?, aims to examine how both countries can reassess their priorities and either restore normalcy or redefine their relationship in a multipolar world.

Scheduled for Tuesday, October 7, at 2:30 p.m., the conference will take place at the University of California, Santa Cruz’s Silicon Valley Campus in Santa Clara. Key themes will include governance of artificial intelligence, dynamics of global conflict, and biomedical breakthroughs that could significantly impact human health.

The All India Management Association (AIMA), which co-hosts the event with UC Santa Cruz, is the apex body for management in India, representing nearly 6,000 corporate and institutional members from both public and private sectors. The US-India Conference serves as a vital platform for insightful discussions and exchanges regarding the evolving landscape of business, technology, and international relations. This event fosters an environment where leaders from both nations can share valuable insights into the India-US partnership.

“The need for strong U.S.-India collaboration has never been greater,” stated Sunil Kant Munjal, Chairman International of AIMA and Chairman of Hero Enterprise. “This gathering offers an opportunity to examine how our two nations can join forces to tackle pressing global issues and contribute to the benefit of our two nations and our people.”

The conference will attract corporate executives, professionals, members of U.S.-India trade and economic bodies, researchers, scholars, and students, all engaging in thought-provoking discussions about the future of U.S.-India relations.

“UC Santa Cruz is proud to once again partner with AIMA to convene this global gathering,” remarked UC Santa Cruz Chancellor Cynthia Larive. “Looking ahead, collaboration in technology, innovation, and other emerging fields will be essential to advancing prosperity for both nations. This conference helps shape the conversation and shows possible paths to a positive and sustainable future.”

Sessions will delve into various topics, including:

Recent shifts in US-India ties and the roots of friction, focusing on how leaders might reframe priorities, manage divergence, and steer the relationship toward strategic coherence.

The emerging competition over AI standards, access to critical technologies, and regulatory influence.

The fragility of global order, the risks of escalating conflict, and the roles India and the US can play in rebalancing global cooperation.

How AI, genomics, and metabolic science are converging to personalize and revolutionize human wellbeing.

Panelists will include influential leaders from major organizations such as Google, Tata Steel, Hero Group, Triveni Turbine Ltd, Trivium, Tata Chemicals Ltd, and UC Santa Cruz. Following the panel discussions, attendees will have the opportunity to network with Silicon Valley executives and the visiting delegation of CEOs.

For those interested, registration to attend the conference is available, along with additional information about the event.

Source: Original article

Santa Clara County Starts Mailing Voter Guides for November 4 Election

The Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters has started mailing voter information guides to registered voters ahead of the November 4, 2025, Statewide Special Election.

The Registrar of Voters’ Office (ROV) in Santa Clara County has commenced the mailing of County Voter Information Guides to all registered voters for the upcoming November 4, 2025, Statewide Special Election. This guide is designed to provide essential information about the candidates and measures that will appear on the ballot, as well as details regarding Vote Center locations, Official Ballot Drop Box sites, a sample of the Official Ballot, and various election resources to assist voters in preparing to cast their ballots.

Voter guides are being sent to all active voters who are registered by the deadline of October 4, 2025. For those who have indicated a preference for voting materials in languages other than English, translated voter guides are available in Chinese, Spanish, Tagalog, and Vietnamese. Voters can conveniently check their registration status, register to vote, update their registration, or change their preferred language online at www.sccvote.org.

Matt Moreles, the Registrar of Voters, emphasized the importance of the County Voter Information Guide, stating, “With so many impactful issues in this special election, the County Voter Information Guide is an important tool to help voters successfully cast their ballot. Our goal is to provide a trusted source of nonpartisan election information so voters can learn what’s on the ballot, how and where to return their ballot, and the various language and accessibility options available for voters to make their voices heard in this election.”

In an effort to promote environmental sustainability, voters are encouraged to opt-out of receiving a printed paper voter guide and instead choose to receive an electronic version, which is available in all mandated languages. This environmentally friendly option can be selected in under five minutes by visiting sccvote.org/gogreen. Voters who choose the paperless option will receive an email containing a link to the online version of the voter guide.

Additionally, Vote by Mail packets, which will include the official ballot for this election, are scheduled to be mailed to all active registered voters on October 6, 2025.

For further information or assistance, voters can reach out to the Registrar of Voters’ Office at (408) 299-VOTE (8683) or toll-free at (866) 430-VOTE (8683), or they can visit www.sccvote.org.

Source: Original article

John Roberts’ Two Decades on the Supreme Court and His Impact

Chief Justice John Roberts marks 20 years on the U.S. Supreme Court, navigating a conservative shift in jurisprudence, particularly in cases involving former President Donald Trump.

Chief Justice John Roberts is celebrating two decades in his role at the U.S. Supreme Court, a period marked by a significant shift toward conservative jurisprudence, particularly in cases related to former President Donald Trump. Throughout his tenure, Roberts has guided the Court through pivotal rulings concerning presidential immunity, administrative power, and various social issues, all while managing the delicate balance between institutional restraint and the pressures of partisanship.

Roberts has occasionally diverged from his conservative colleagues, yet he frequently aligns with major decisions that enhance executive authority. His leadership style has been characterized by a commitment to preserving the Court’s legitimacy, even when faced with the challenge of issuing controversial rulings. Critics argue that his approach has contributed to the consolidation of power within the executive branch, while supporters contend that he has effectively corrected instances of overreach and maintained legal consistency.

As Roberts embarks on his third decade as Chief Justice, the Supreme Court continues to confront urgent issues that challenge constitutional boundaries and the balance of power among the branches of government. His influence on the Court’s trajectory during this time will likely resonate for years to come, shaping not only legal precedents but also the broader political landscape.

According to Global Net News, Roberts’ tenure reflects a complex interplay of judicial philosophy and the realities of contemporary governance, illustrating the evolving role of the Supreme Court in American society.

Source: Original article

South Asian Healthcare Leaders Work to Rebuild Trust in U.S. Medicine

Leading South Asian healthcare professionals convened to discuss strategies for rebuilding public trust in medicine amid rising health misinformation.

WASHINGTON, DC – On September 16, the South Asian Impact Foundation hosted a panel featuring prominent South Asian voices in medicine and public health. The event aimed to tackle a significant challenge of our time: the urgent need to rebuild public trust in healthcare.

The panel, titled “Beyond the Exam Room: South Asian Health Leaders Shaping Public Trust,” brought together a diverse group of physicians and public officials whose influence spans from social media platforms to state legislatures.

Moderated by Dr. Vin Gupta, a medical analyst for NBC and MSNBC, the discussion took place at the Marriott Hotel and highlighted how South Asian professionals are utilizing their expertise to combat misinformation, foster relatability, and protect the health of various communities.

Among the panelists were Dr. Meena Seshamani, Maryland Secretary of Health and former head of Medicare; Dr. Arif Kamal, Chief Patient Officer of the American Cancer Society; Representative Arvind Venkat, a physician and the first Indian American elected to the Pennsylvania State House; and Dr. Mona Amin, a pediatrician and founder of PedsDocTalk, whose health and parenting content reaches over two million people across platforms like Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and podcasts.

South Asians represent one of the most significant demographics within America’s medical workforce. However, as the panel illustrated, their influence goes well beyond clinical care. In an age marked by rampant health misinformation, these professionals are leveraging every available avenue—policy, journalism, organized medicine, and social media—to translate scientific knowledge into accessible, human-centered messages.

“Relatability is the root of trust,” stated Dr. Arif Kamal, emphasizing that meaningful connections begin with shared experiences. Dr. Seshamani shared insights from her leadership during Medicare’s historic drug price negotiations, noting, “Even when we didn’t agree, stakeholders understood why we made the decisions we did. Respect and transparency are how we break down walls.”

Representative Arvind Venkat discussed how his advocacy during the COVID-19 pandemic as an emergency physician led him to a political career. “All politics is local,” he remarked, encouraging young South Asians to articulate their motivations and seek mentorship beyond the medical field. For him, this meant applying his expertise to legislative solutions, especially in areas where healthcare consolidation and regulation impact patients the most.

Dr. Mona Amin emphasized the significance of digital platforms in reaching millions of families globally. Her contributions to health education, parenting advice, and vaccine advocacy have established her as a trusted pediatric voice across continents. “You can’t do it all,” she reflected, highlighting the importance of recognizing one’s strengths. “But you can use your superpower to help the world.”

A recurring theme emerged throughout the discussion: humility, storytelling, and persistence are vital for navigating spaces where doctors are not traditionally recognized, whether in politics, policymaking, or digital advocacy. “Our stories are our strengths,” Dr. Seshamani urged, encouraging younger professionals to draw from both personal and professional experiences in shaping their public roles.

The panelists also acknowledged the challenges posed by online trolls, political divisions, and institutional inertia. However, they underscored that South Asian professionals are uniquely positioned to bridge these divides. Whether addressing cancer disparities, advocating for fair drug pricing, or providing parenting advice online, their relatability is crucial in fostering trust when it is most needed.

As moderator Dr. Gupta summarized, the contributions of South Asian health leaders illustrate that modern medicine encompasses more than just diagnoses and prescriptions. It involves fostering resilience, building informed communities, and expanding the definition of what it means to be a doctor, public servant, or health advocate.

Source: Original article

North Carolina Democrat Denies Link Between Train Attack and Suspect’s Releases

North Carolina state Rep. Marcia Morey faces backlash for asserting there is “no correlation” between the murder of Iryna Zarutska and the accused killer’s multiple jail releases.

North Carolina state Representative Marcia Morey, a Democrat, is facing significant criticism for her assertion that there is “no correlation” between the murder of Iryna Zarutska and the repeated releases of her alleged killer from jail. Zarutska, a 23-year-old refugee from Ukraine, was tragically murdered, and the circumstances surrounding her death have reignited debates over the state’s bail system.

Decarlos Brown, the man accused of killing Zarutska, has been described by authorities as a dangerous career criminal. He had been in and out of jail 14 times prior to the incident, raising concerns among critics who argue that a flawed bail system allowed him to remain free despite his violent history. Many believe that the system’s failures contributed directly to Zarutska’s death.

In response to the backlash, Morey defended her comments during a legislative session, emphasizing her commitment to bail reform. “But don’t correlate what happened in January and a magistrate who set a bail according to guidelines to what happened in August. There is no correlation,” she stated, attempting to separate the judicial decisions made in the past from the tragic outcome of Zarutska’s murder.

However, her remarks have been met with strong opposition from various lawmakers who argue that the incident exemplifies the dangers of allowing repeat offenders back into the community. Republican Senate Leader Phil Berger expressed his outrage, stating, “Iryna should still be alive. She should be thriving and enjoying time with her family and friends.” He criticized the current bail reform measures, claiming they compromise public safety by prioritizing the rights of defendants over the safety of victims.

In the wake of Zarutska’s murder, North Carolina lawmakers have proposed “Iryna’s Law,” aimed at eliminating cashless bail in an effort to enhance public safety and hold violent offenders accountable. This legislative move reflects a growing sentiment among some lawmakers that the existing bail policies need to be reevaluated in light of the tragic events.

Supporters of bail reform, however, argue that the current system disproportionately affects low-income defendants who cannot afford bail, leading to unjust incarceration. They contend that the focus should be on reforming the system to ensure fairness rather than simply increasing punitive measures against repeat offenders.

The debate surrounding bail reform and public safety continues to intensify in North Carolina, particularly as families of victims like Zarutska advocate for changes that could prevent similar tragedies in the future. As lawmakers grapple with these complex issues, the conversation around justice, accountability, and the rights of defendants remains at the forefront of public discourse.

According to Fox News, the ongoing discussions highlight the challenges of balancing the need for public safety with the principles of justice and fairness in the legal system.

Source: Original article

Zelenskyy Open to Leaving Office and Elections If War Ends

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed readiness to leave office once the war with Russia concludes, emphasizing peace over personal political ambitions.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has indicated that he is prepared to step down from his position once Russia’s war against Ukraine comes to an end. In an interview with Axios, Zelenskyy emphasized that his primary focus is achieving peace rather than securing another term in office.

“My goal is to finish the war,” Zelenskyy stated during the interview with Barak Ravid, which took place after his address to the United Nations General Assembly in New York and prior to his return to Kyiv.

When asked whether Ukraine would hold elections during a ceasefire, Zelenskyy was unequivocal in his response. “So do you commit that if tomorrow, President Putin agrees for a ceasefire of three months, six months, whatever, you will push forward to go for elections in Ukraine?” Ravid inquired. Zelenskyy replied, “Yes.”

Further pressed on whether he could envision leading Ukraine in a peacetime scenario, Zelenskyy reiterated his willingness to step aside once the war is concluded. “If we will finish the war with Russia? Yes,” he affirmed. However, he clarified that elections are not his personal ambition. “It’s not my goal, elections,” he explained. “I want it very much, in a very difficult period of time, to be with my country, help my country. Yes, that is what I wanted. My goal is to finish the war,” he stated.

Zelenskyy’s comments come at a time when Ukraine remains under martial law, a measure that has been in place since Russia’s full-scale invasion began in February 2022. Under martial law, elections cannot be conducted.

First elected in 2019 by a significant margin, Zelenskyy would have seen his five-year term conclude in May 2024 had the war not erupted. As it stands, he has been in office for over six years, surpassing his original mandate.

Fox News Digital has reached out to Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s office for further comment.

Source: Original article

Abbas to Address UN Amid Visa Dispute and Hamas Concerns

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas calls for Hamas to surrender its weapons and advocates for a ceasefire ahead of his upcoming address to the United Nations General Assembly.

Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas is scheduled to address the United Nations General Assembly on Thursday via video link, following the revocation of his visa by the U.S. last month. The U.N. recently voted 145-5 to allow Abbas to speak at this significant international event, despite the U.S. accusing the Palestinian leadership of undermining peace efforts and barring entry for approximately 80 Palestinians.

It remains uncertain how Abbas’ upcoming address will differ from his remarks made on Monday at an event co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia. During that event, Abbas called for an immediate ceasefire and urged Hamas to surrender all weapons to the PA.

“Hamas will have no role in governance, and it, along with other factions, must hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority,” Abbas stated. “We want one unified state, without arms outside the framework of the law, under one legal system, and with one legitimate security force.”

Abbas also reaffirmed his condemnation of the actions of the Israeli occupation, while simultaneously denouncing the killing and kidnapping of civilians, including the attacks carried out by Hamas on October 7, 2023.

The PA was established in 1994 following the Oslo Accords peace agreement with Israel, but it has been largely sidelined since 2005. It continues to operate in the West Bank, although it has faced ongoing clashes with Hamas, which has held de facto power in the Gaza Strip since 2007 after a violent power struggle.

Last month, the U.S. State Department indicated that the PA “must consistently repudiate terrorism — including the October 7 massacre” before it can be considered a partner for peace.

Despite the PA’s limited role in ceasefire negotiations, Abbas expressed gratitude on Monday to the U.S., Qatar, and Egypt for their mediation efforts with Israel. He asserted that the PA is the only legitimate authority capable of assuming full responsibility for governance and security in Gaza, proposing a temporary administrative committee linked to the Palestinian government in the West Bank, supported by Arab and international partners.

Abbas outlined a “comprehensive reform agenda” aimed at strengthening governance, transparency, and the rule of law in Gaza. His proposed plan includes reforming financial institutions, aligning school curricula with UNESCO standards, establishing a social welfare program, and holding presidential and parliamentary elections within one year of the conflict’s conclusion.

The State Department did not immediately respond to inquiries regarding its support for the re-implementation of the PA. The Trump administration has consistently made clear its opposition to the actions taken by other Western nations, which have recently indicated their intention to recognize a “state of Palestine.”

Source: Original article

Indian-American Anna Menon Selected for NASA’s 2025 Astronaut Class

Anna Menon has been selected for NASA’s 2025 astronaut class, marking a significant milestone in her already distinguished career in space exploration.

HOUSTON, TX — Anna Menon, who recently served as a mission specialist on SpaceX’s Polaris Dawn flight, has been chosen for NASA’s 2025 astronaut class. This selection highlights yet another milestone in a career filled with remarkable achievements.

Menon is known for her role in setting a new altitude record for women in space and participating in the first commercial spacewalk. She began her official astronaut training in September, further solidifying her status in the field of space exploration.

Adding a unique dimension to her story, Anna is married to fellow NASA astronaut Anil Menon. Together, they form one of the few couples in which both partners are active astronauts. The Menons are parents to two children, and Anil is slated to fly on the Soyuz MS-29 mission in June 2026 as part of Expedition 75.

Menon’s journey to space began at SpaceX, where she dedicated seven years as a senior engineer. In this role, she supported crew operations for the Dragon and Starship spacecraft and spent considerable time in mission control. She holds a bachelor’s degree in mathematics and Spanish from Texas Christian University, as well as a master’s degree in biomedical engineering from Duke University.

A native of Houston, Menon balances her professional commitments with community service. She volunteers with organizations such as the World Health Organization and Engineers Without Borders. In her leisure time, she enjoys hiking, scuba diving, and flying.

Her contributions to the Polaris Dawn mission have garnered her several accolades, including the World Record for Altitude: Women’s Record and the Dr. Buzz Aldrin Space Advancement Award. Additionally, she has received the Duke University Distinguished Young Alumni Award, multiple recognitions from SpaceX, and various NASA awards for her work at the Johnson Space Center.

Together, Anna and Anil Menon exemplify both a personal and professional partnership, pushing the boundaries of space exploration while nurturing a family on Earth.

Source: Original article

Ben Carson Sworn in as USDA National Advisor on Nutrition and Health

Former neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson has been sworn in as the national advisor for nutrition, health, and housing at the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Dr. Ben Carson, a prominent figure in American politics and a former neurosurgeon, was officially sworn in on Wednesday as the national advisor for nutrition, health, and housing with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

Carson previously served as the secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development during President Donald Trump’s first term. In his new role, he will provide guidance to both President Trump and USDA Secretary Rollins on critical issues related to nutrition, rural healthcare quality, and housing accessibility.

According to a USDA news release, Carson will act as the Department’s chief voice on these matters. He will collaborate closely with Secretary Rollins on initiatives under the President’s Make America Healthy Again Commission and work alongside leadership in USDA’s Rural Development Mission Area.

“Today, too many Americans are suffering from the effects of poor nutrition. Through common-sense policymaking, we have an opportunity to give our most vulnerable families the tools they need to flourish,” Carson stated in the release. He expressed his honor in working with Secretary Rollins on initiatives aimed at realizing President Trump’s vision for a healthier and stronger America.

Earlier this year, President Trump signed an executive order to establish a Religious Liberty Commission, appointing Carson as vice chair of the commission.

During a recent address at the American Cornerstone Institute’s Founders’ Dinner, Trump announced plans to award Carson the Presidential Medal of Freedom. A ceremony honoring Carson is expected to take place at the White House. Notably, Carson was previously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President George W. Bush in 2008.

Carson is also the founder of the American Cornerstone Institute, an organization dedicated to advocating for the principles he believes have shaped his life and contribute to the greatness of the nation: Faith, Liberty, Community, and Life.

As he embarks on this new role, Carson’s focus will be on addressing pressing issues related to nutrition and health, particularly in rural communities, while also enhancing housing accessibility for those in need.

His appointment comes at a time when the nation is increasingly aware of the challenges posed by inadequate nutrition and healthcare access, especially among vulnerable populations.

With a wealth of experience in both healthcare and public service, Carson is poised to make significant contributions to the USDA’s efforts in improving the quality of life for Americans across the country.

Source: Original article

Indian Americans Celebrate Professor Jagmohan Singh’s Efforts to Preserve Bhagat Singh’s Legacy

Over 80 Indian Americans gathered at MINT Restaurant to honor Professor Jagmohan Singh, nephew of revolutionary Bhagat Singh, celebrating his legacy and the ongoing impact of his ideals.

More than 80 distinguished Indian Americans convened at MINT Restaurant to pay tribute to Professor Jagmohan Singh, the nephew of the legendary freedom fighter Shaheed Bhagat Singh. Bhagat Singh is revered for his courageous challenge against British colonial rule in India and has inspired countless individuals in their quest for independence.

The event was hosted by Varinder Bhalla, Chairman and Founder of the Coalition of Indian American Associations of New York (CIONY), with support from the American Punjabi Society. This gathering served as a poignant reminder of Bhagat Singh’s enduring legacy and the values he championed.

The evening commenced with a short video that showcased Bhagat Singh’s life and contributions. Originally produced in 2010 by Dr. Riti Sunshine Bhalla during her high school years, the video was scripted and produced by Varinder Bhalla. It has since been broadcast across various channels in the United States and Europe, featuring appearances from U.S. Congress members, Senators, and Governors, which underscored its historical significance.

Harry Singh Bolla, an event sponsor from a village near Bhagat Singh’s ancestral home, delivered a heartfelt keynote address. He spoke about how Bhagat Singh’s legacy has profoundly influenced his own life, emphasizing the revolutionary’s impact on the Indian American community.

Professor Jagmohan Singh, the son of Bhagat Singh’s younger sister Bibi Amar Kaur, addressed the audience with a deeply personal account of his lifelong commitment to preserving his uncle’s ideals. He articulated how Bhagat Singh’s story continues to resonate with and inspire new generations.

During his speech, Professor Singh reflected on his encounters with several of Bhagat Singh’s close associates who fought for India’s freedom. He shared emotional memories of Bhagat Singh’s final days, including intimate conversations with his parents and the remarkable courage his uncle displayed as he faced execution.

In a poignant revelation, Professor Singh recounted his mother’s imprisonment for her active participation in the independence movement. He shared how, as a one-year-old, he spent a year in jail with her, illustrating the personal sacrifices made by his family in the struggle for freedom.

The event concluded with an engaging question-and-answer session led by Varinder Bhalla. Among the most touching moments was when Professor Singh described Bhagat Singh’s reflections during his final hours, including the ideological differences he had with his father, who had sought clemency for him. These insights left the audience feeling inspired and profoundly moved.

As the evening drew to a close, the attendees were reminded of the importance of preserving the legacy of Bhagat Singh and the ideals he stood for, ensuring that his contributions to the fight for independence continue to inspire future generations.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Community Responds to Recent Policy Changes in Newsroom

USCIS provides a comprehensive resource for news, data, and updates related to immigration and citizenship on its official website.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) offers a centralized platform for individuals seeking the latest information regarding immigration and citizenship. This resource is accessible through the USCIS News webpage, which features a variety of news releases and alerts organized by topic and date.

In addition to news updates, the USCIS News webpage includes important policy and procedure changes, as well as timely announcements about office closures and other emergencies that may affect the public.

For those interested in visual content, USCIS provides a Video and Image Gallery showcasing various aspects of its operations. This gallery serves as a valuable resource for understanding the agency’s work and its impact on communities across the nation.

Data enthusiasts can explore the Immigration and Citizenship Data page, which presents a wealth of statistics and information related to immigration trends and demographics. This data is essential for researchers, policymakers, and the general public who wish to gain insights into immigration patterns.

To stay connected, USCIS maintains a Social Media Directory that allows individuals to follow the agency on various platforms. This ensures that the public receives timely updates and information directly from USCIS through their preferred social media channels.

USCIS also shares recent speeches, statements, and congressional testimony from its leadership. These documents are searchable by topic and date, providing transparency and insight into the agency’s priorities and initiatives.

For those seeking specific information, the Electronic Reading Room offers access to documents identified under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Users can search for topics of interest using a convenient drop-down list, making it easier to find relevant information.

USCIS recognizes the importance of media communication and has established a network of agency representatives across the country to respond to media inquiries. This ensures that journalists and media outlets have access to accurate and timely information from the agency.

Lastly, USCIS keeps the public informed about upcoming events through its Upcoming Events section. This includes details on local engagements and national events, allowing individuals to participate in discussions and initiatives related to immigration and citizenship.

For more information and updates, visit the USCIS News webpage, where you can find a wealth of resources and stay informed about the latest developments in immigration and citizenship.

Source: Original article

India and U.S. Strengthen Bilateral Relations Through Strategic Diplomacy

India’s recent diplomatic meetings in the U.S. mark a significant step toward strengthening bilateral relations and addressing global challenges.

In a concerted effort to enhance bilateral relations, India conducted significant diplomatic meetings in the United States on September 22, 2025. These engagements reflect India’s proactive approach to addressing global challenges and reinforcing strategic partnerships.

Commerce and Industries Minister Piyush Goyal led discussions in Washington aimed at resuming and advancing trade negotiations. The primary objective was to translate political goodwill into tangible commercial outcomes. The discussions focused on achieving a mutually beneficial Trade Agreement (BTA) before the end of the year, addressing critical issues such as market access, supply-chain cooperation, and sectoral collaborations in technology, clean energy, and pharmaceuticals.

The U.S. Department of State issued a statement highlighting Secretary Marco Rubio’s appreciation for India’s continued engagement on various issues, including trade, defense, energy, and critical minerals. This acknowledgment underscores the strategic importance of the U.S.-India relationship.

Simultaneously, in New York, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar met with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio to discuss broader strategic issues. The meeting aimed to stabilize bilateral relations amidst trade frictions and new visa regulations. Both sides emphasized the importance of maintaining strong diplomatic ties and cooperation on global issues.

The twin meetings resulted in agreements to continue bilateral dialogues and deepen ties through diplomatic and commercial efforts. Working-level officials have been tasked with negotiating specific market-access and regulatory issues in the coming months. While immediate sweeping agreements were not achieved, the meetings opened avenues for more focused discussions and practical outcomes in areas of mutual benefit.

Source: Original article

DOJ Closes Investigation into BAPS Akshardham Temple Labor Allegations

The U.S. Department of Justice has closed its investigation into forced labor allegations at the BAPS Swaminarayan Akshardham temple in New Jersey, while a civil lawsuit continues in federal court.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has officially concluded its investigation into allegations of forced labor at the BAPS Swaminarayan Akshardham temple in Robbinsville, New Jersey. This temple is recognized as the largest Hindu temple in the Western Hemisphere. The investigation was launched following a raid in 2021, which was prompted by claims made by Indian workers who were brought to the United States on R-1 religious worker visas.

In May 2021, six workers filed a civil lawsuit, alleging they were coerced into performing strenuous construction tasks under poor working conditions. The lawsuit claimed that their passports were confiscated and that they were inadequately compensated for their labor. An amended complaint later introduced 15 additional plaintiffs; however, 12 of these individuals withdrew their claims, stating they had been misled by their legal counsel.

The leadership of the temple has consistently maintained that the workers were volunteers, referred to as “sevaks,” who regarded their participation as a form of spiritual service. They emphasized that the construction of the temple was a collective effort, involving over 12,500 individuals from diverse backgrounds and countries.

The DOJ’s decision to close the criminal investigation has been welcomed by officials at BAPS. They expressed relief and reaffirmed their commitment to transparency and community service. Lenin Joshi, a volunteer at the temple, described the community as “shaken” by the initial allegations but confident in the integrity of their efforts.

Despite the closure of the criminal investigation, the civil lawsuit remains active in federal court. Leaders at BAPS are optimistic about a favorable outcome, citing the DOJ’s findings as supportive of their position. The civil case is set to resume at an undetermined date, with both sides preparing for further proceedings.

Source: Original article

Democrats Criticize Trump’s Attacks on Free Speech, Target Vulnerable Republicans

Democrats have launched a digital ad campaign targeting House Republicans, accusing former President Donald Trump of undermining free speech following the suspension of comedian Jimmy Kimmel’s show.

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) initiated a new digital advertising campaign on Wednesday, highlighting what it describes as former President Donald Trump’s “ongoing attacks on free speech.” This campaign follows the recent suspension of comedian Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night television show, which has drawn significant attention and controversy.

The ads will focus on several House Republicans in swing districts who are facing tough re-election battles in the upcoming midterms. The campaign will be featured across various conservative and independent media platforms, including popular podcasts hosted by Joe Rogan and Ben Shapiro, which resonate strongly with younger and male audiences.

The DNC’s campaign comes in response to ABC’s decision to temporarily pull Kimmel’s show off the air after his comments regarding the alleged assassin of conservative activist Charlie Kirk sparked outrage and a veiled threat from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

The suspension of Kimmel has ignited backlash among Democrats, progressives, and even some prominent conservatives, who argue that the late-night host is being punished for exercising his right to free speech. Conversely, many Republicans contend that Kimmel’s remarks, which suggested that Kirk’s suspected killer was affiliated with the MAGA movement, were both outrageous and unfounded.

ABC reinstated Kimmel on Monday, and his program returned to the air on Tuesday night. However, approximately 60 affiliated stations owned by Nextar Media Group and Sinclair Broadcast Group opted to preempt the show.

The DNC asserted in a statement, “The American people don’t support attacks on free speech, which is why Trump is losing support among independent and conservative voters.” They emphasized that the Republican base is fracturing, with notable figures such as Megyn Kelly, Ted Cruz, and Ben Shapiro publicly distancing themselves from the former president’s administration.

The DNC’s advertisement features a clip of Trump from the early days of his second administration, where he declared, “On day one, I signed an executive order to stop all government censorship.” The ad’s narrator later claimed, “Trump wants to control what you see so he can control what you think.”

This campaign, which is backed by a modest budget in the five-figure range, will specifically target the congressional districts of Republican Representatives Rob Wittman and Jen Kiggans from Virginia, Brian Fitzpatrick from Pennsylvania, and Tom Kean Jr. from New Jersey.

The DNC stated, “It’s clear Donald Trump only cares about silencing his critics — and now, voters across the country and in Virginia, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey are going to hear about it.”

Trump and many of his allies, who have long positioned themselves as advocates for free speech, have criticized those who have spoken out against Kirk since the conservative activist’s assassination earlier this month. The former president welcomed ABC’s initial decision to suspend Kimmel and has suggested revoking the broadcast licenses of networks that he believes treat him unfairly.

DNC Chair Ken Martin expressed to Fox News, “Donald Trump’s administration has amassed a chilling record of restricting speech, extorting private companies, and dropping the full weight of the government censorship hammer on Americans simply exercising their First Amendment rights. This is no exaggeration, and it’s splintering the coalition that got Trump elected.” He further claimed that Trump is “attempting to silence people. It’s un-American, and Democrats won’t stand for it.”

During the administrations of Democratic Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, Republicans and conservatives frequently criticized what they perceived as efforts to suppress free speech, accusing Democrats of promoting “cancel culture.” In response to recent events, Trump and his allies have framed their actions as a shift from “cancel culture” to “consequence culture.”

Source: Original article

Trump Officials Criticize Governor for Ignoring Disruptive Anti-ICE Protests

The Department of Homeland Security has criticized Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker for his lack of response to an anti-ICE protest that escalated into chaos, prompting federal authorities to use tear gas.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has publicly criticized Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker for his inaction during a chaotic anti-ICE protest in Broadview, a suburb of Chicago. The protest forced federal authorities to deploy tear gas and other non-lethal measures to regain control of the situation.

In a statement released on Monday, DHS claimed that local police, operating under Pritzker’s sanctuary jurisdiction, “refused to answer multiple calls for assistance.” This assertion follows reports from Fox News Digital detailing clashes between federal officials and protesters who were obstructing ICE vehicles attempting to enter and exit a processing facility.

DHS characterized the protesters as “rioters,” stating that 16 individuals have been arrested in connection with the incident. The agency alleged that the rioters engaged in various violent actions, including obstructing law enforcement, throwing tear gas canisters, rocks, bottles, and fireworks, slashing the tires of vehicles, blocking facility entrances, and trespassing on private property. Additionally, it was reported that some rioters assaulted law enforcement officials during the unrest.

In response, Matt Hill, a spokesperson for Governor Pritzker, refuted the claims made by DHS. He told Fox News Digital that it is “completely false to suggest the state or local municipalities have been obstructing federal officials.” Hill emphasized that the state had not received multiple requests for assistance from the federal government and reminded DHS of the importance of coordinating with local law enforcement to ensure public safety.

“Governor Pritzker has been clear that violence is unacceptable and everyone needs to follow the law, which includes federal agents respecting constitutional rights to peaceful protest,” Hill added.

Hill also cautioned the media to approach reports from the Trump administration with skepticism, citing a “record of lies, lack of transparency, and failure to coordinate with the state and local law enforcement.”

The DHS statement highlighted that the protest disrupted an operation targeting individuals with serious criminal backgrounds. Among those being processed at the facility were individuals with convictions for drug trafficking, domestic abuse, driving under the influence (DUI), and assault.

One of the individuals mentioned by DHS was Andres Ventura-Uvaldo, a Mexican national with a history of felony DUI and domestic violence arrests. Another, Alberto Algeria Barron, had been previously removed from the U.S. in 2014 and had two convictions for domestic battery. Additionally, Erwin Jose Roa-Mustafa, a Dominican national, was being processed after pleading guilty to federal charges related to drug distribution, including fentanyl.

Other individuals included Ibis Alberto Testa Nunez, a Mexican national with prior arrests for cocaine possession, and Salvador Alcantar-Alcantar, who had been arrested for DUI, trespassing, and assault. Carlos Eduardo Chavez-Cardenas from Bolivia had a history of DUI and drug possession convictions.

DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin condemned the actions of the protesters, stating, “These heinous criminals, including domestic abusers, drug traffickers, violent offenders, and drunk drivers are some of the illegal aliens being held in the ICE Broadview Processing Center.” She further remarked that the rioters were “fighting to keep rapists, murderers, and other violent criminals loose on Illinois streets.” McLaughlin urged the public to recognize the efforts of ICE officers who work daily to enhance community safety.

This incident comes amid reports from DHS indicating that ICE officials are experiencing a more than 1,000 percent increase in assaults while conducting operations across Illinois.

According to Fox News Digital, the situation underscores the ongoing tensions between federal immigration enforcement and local jurisdictions that adopt sanctuary policies.

Source: Original article

EU Chief Calls for Gaza Reconstruction and Two-State Solution at UNGA

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the need for Gaza’s reconstruction and reaffirmed support for a two-state solution during her address at the 80th United Nations General Assembly.

New York, September 23 (ANI) — European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen addressed the 80th United Nations General Assembly, reiterating Europe’s commitment to a two-state solution while unveiling new initiatives aimed at supporting Palestine and rebuilding Gaza.

“We will set up a Palestine Donor Group. Because any future Palestinian State must be viable also from an economic point of view. And we Europeans will set up a dedicated instrument for Gaza’s reconstruction. Gaza must be rebuilt,” von der Leyen stated.

Highlighting Europe’s role in supporting the Palestinian Authority, she remarked, “When the night is darkest, we must hold fast to our compass, and our compass is the two-state solution. Since the beginning of this war, Europe has been the lifeline of the Palestinian Authority. But we must all do more, and this is why we will set up a Palestine donor group.”

Von der Leyen emphasized that the only realistic peace plan involves two states, ensuring a secure Israel alongside a viable Palestinian state, while also addressing the threat posed by Hamas.

In conjunction with these remarks, Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas issued a stern warning to Hamas and its factions, urging them to surrender their weapons to the Palestinian Authority. He asserted that the state of Palestine is the sole entity entitled to govern and ensure security in Gaza.

Speaking via video link during a special session on the two-state solution at the UN General Assembly, Abbas outlined a vision for a unified Palestinian state governed by a single law and legitimate security force.

“The state of Palestine is the only entity eligible to assume full responsibility for governance and security in Gaza. This comes through an interim administrative committee affiliated with the Palestinian government in the West Bank and Arab and international support and participation,” Abbas stated.

He emphasized that “Hamas will have no role in governing” and urged, “Hamas and other factions must surrender their weapons to the Palestinian Authority. What we want is one unified state without weapons, a state with one law and one legitimate security force.”

Linking his vision to recent diplomatic efforts, Abbas expressed gratitude for the New York Declaration adopted by the UN General Assembly in July. He described it as marking “the beginning of an irreversible path” toward ending the humanitarian crisis and Israeli occupation, in accordance with international legitimacy and the Arab Peace Initiative.

The declaration envisions an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital, living peacefully alongside Israel.

Abbas called for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, emphasizing the need for unhindered humanitarian access through the UN, the release of all hostages and prisoners, and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. He also advocated for urgent reconstruction efforts in Gaza and the West Bank through the Cairo International Conference.

“The declaration stressed that the war against our people must come to an immediate and durable end. It noted that the crimes emanating from the siege, the starvation, and destruction cannot be a means of achieving security. Therefore, we call for a permanent ceasefire,” he said.

“We need to ensure humanitarian access through the United Nations. We need to guarantee the release of all hostages and prisoners, with the withdrawal of the occupation forces from Gaza. We need a start without delay of Gaza and the West Bank reconstruction through the Cairo International Conference,” the president added.

Building on this, Abbas condemned the “occupation’s crimes,” including the siege, starvation, and destruction, as well as Hamas’s actions on October 7, 2023.

“We stress our condemnation of the occupation’s crimes. We also condemn the killing and detention of civilians, including Hamas’s actions on October the 7th, 2023,” he stated.

He further denounced Israeli policies, including settlement expansion, annexation, settler violence, and attacks on Islamic and Christian holy sites.

“We condemn the Israeli narrative on greater Israel, which flouts international law. It represents a direct threat to Arab national security and international peace,” he added.

The special session was co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia. During the session, French President Emmanuel Macron formally announced France’s recognition of the state of Palestine.

Source: Original article

SP Leader Azam Khan Expresses Gratitude After Release from Sitapur Jail

Azam Khan, a prominent leader of the Samajwadi Party, expressed gratitude to his supporters upon his release from Sitapur Jail after nearly two years behind bars.

Shahjahanpur (Uttar Pradesh) [India], September 23 (ANI) — Azam Khan, a prominent leader of the Samajwadi Party, walked out of Sitapur Jail on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, after spending nearly two years incarcerated.

As he emerged from the facility, Khan expressed heartfelt gratitude to his supporters, stating, “Thanks to everyone. My blessings to all who supported me.”

Khan’s imprisonment stemmed from his involvement in the Quality Bar land encroachment case. He was granted bail by the Allahabad High Court in May of this year, paving the way for his release.

In response to speculation regarding a potential alliance with the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), Khan clarified, “This can be explained only by those who are making the speculations. I did not meet anyone in jail. I was not allowed to make a phone call. So, I have been completely out of touch for five years.”

Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav welcomed Khan’s release, promising to withdraw all “false” cases against him if the party regains power in Uttar Pradesh.

Shivpal Singh Yadav, an SP MLA who was present to receive Khan, criticized the Yogi Adityanath government, alleging that Khan had been “framed” in false cases. He welcomed the court’s decision to grant bail, stating, “Azam Khan was framed by the government in false cases. However, the court has granted him bail and has provided relief to him in cases. I welcome this decision. I welcome the Supreme Court and the High Court. Many false cases were filed against him. The Samajwadi Party stands beside him.”

Earlier, the Allahabad High Court had granted bail to former Uttar Pradesh Minister Mohammad Azam Khan in the Quality Bar land case. Khan’s advocate, Mohammad Khalid, indicated that with this bail, there were no pending cases that would keep him in jail, suggesting that his release was imminent.

Khalid stated, “So, there’s no pending case that would keep him in jail. As of today, bail has been granted in all the cases. This process may take two to three days. As of now, there are no other pending cases.”

Source: Original article

US Strikes Drug-Smuggling Boat Carrying Over Ton of Cocaine

The Dominican Republic reported a major drug seizure after a U.S. airstrike targeted a vessel carrying over a ton of suspected cocaine.

The Dominican Republic has announced a significant drug seizure following a U.S. airstrike on a vessel suspected of trafficking narcotics. The boat was reportedly carrying “approximately 1,000 kilograms of suspected cocaine,” which translates to over 2,200 pounds, or more than one ton of the drug.

In the aftermath of the airstrike, the Dominican Republic’s National Drug Control Directorate and its navy seized hundreds of packages containing the suspected cocaine. These packages were subsequently sent, under chain of custody, to the National Institute of Forensic Sciences (INACIF) for analysis to determine their exact type and weight.

The operation was described as the first “joint operation against narcoterrorism in the Caribbean region” conducted between the Dominican Republic and the United States. According to a news release from the National Drug Control Directorate, authorities detected a speedboat, known as a “Go Fast” type, which intelligence reports indicated was loaded with narcotics and heading toward Dominican territory. The intention was to use the Dominican Republic as a transit point to transport the drugs to the United States.

This airstrike is part of a broader initiative by the U.S. government to combat drug trafficking. President Donald Trump has ordered strikes on multiple vessels this month as part of this crackdown. In a recent post on Truth Social, he emphasized the administration’s commitment to targeting drug traffickers, stating, “IF YOU ARE TRANSPORTING DRUGS THAT CAN KILL AMERICANS, WE ARE HUNTING YOU!”

The U.S. government has classified cocaine as “an intense, euphoria-producing stimulant drug with strong addictive potential.” A fact sheet from the government notes that tolerance to cocaine’s effects develops rapidly, leading users to consume higher doses.

This operation underscores the ongoing collaboration between the Dominican Republic and U.S. authorities in the fight against narcotics trafficking in the Caribbean region.

Source: Original article

California’s Gun Violence Restraining Orders: Seven Insights on Their Impact

California’s Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs) serve as a proactive model for preventing gun violence, emphasizing intervention over punishment and showing promising results in saving lives.

In the wake of a tragic mass shooting in New York that claimed the life of Didarul Islam, a Bangladeshi American NYPD officer, the debate over gun control has reignited across the nation. While New York mourns, California offers a proactive model for prevention through Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs). This article explores the key insights from California’s approach and how it could serve as a blueprint for other states.

Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs) in California are designed to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed a threat to themselves or others. According to Ari Freilich, Director of the California Department of Justice’s Office of Gun Violence Prevention, “GVROs aren’t about punishment. They’re about prevention.” This highlights that these orders are a civil tool aimed at restricting access to firearms without resorting to incarceration.

Family members, employers, educators, and law enforcement can request GVROs from a civil court in California. Once granted, the order prohibits the individual from purchasing or possessing firearms for a specific period, providing a critical intervention window. Freilich notes that California’s GVRO law has become a model for 19 other states and Washington, D.C., underscoring its potential as a proactive safety measure.

GVROs also address a significant gap between the mental health and criminal justice systems. Psychiatrist Dr. Amy Barnhorst emphasizes that these orders can be utilized in situations where someone is clearly disturbed or making threats but does not meet the threshold for psychiatric hospitalization or arrest. This allows for the removal of firearms from potentially dangerous situations while addressing underlying issues.

One of the most compelling aspects of GVROs is their effectiveness in preventing suicides. Dr. Barnhorst states that removing firearms significantly increases the chances of survival in potential suicide cases. “For every 17 GVROs requested in cases of suicide concern, one life is saved,” she notes, highlighting the profound impact of this intervention.

The use of GVROs in California has surged by over 500 percent in five years, increasing from 424 orders filed in 2018 to 2,073 in 2023. During the same period, firearm-related homicides and suicides have declined in the state. Chris Dargan points out, “Even with strong gun safety laws, over 3,000 Californians die from gun violence each year,” emphasizing the need for continued awareness and utilization of protective orders.

Law enforcement officials also recognize the practical application of GVROs in preventing potential tragedies. Sergeant Kyle Ikeuchi of the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office highlights their use in cases where individuals have threatened workplace violence or school shootings. “It’s a tool that allows us to act before tragedy strikes,” he states, stressing the importance of community vigilance in reporting potential threats.

Community awareness plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of GVROs. Gabriella Gonzalez, a member of the Reduce the Risk Youth Advisory Council, shared her personal experience of being stalked and threatened by an armed individual. Her story underscores the critical need for outreach and education, emphasizing that awareness of protection orders can empower individuals to seek justice and protect themselves.

California’s comprehensive approach, which combines legal tools, education, and community engagement, offers a potential blueprint for other states grappling with gun violence. The increasing use of GVROs and the corresponding decline in gun-related deaths suggest a correlation between proactive interventions and improved public safety.

Source: Original article

Charlie Kirk Honored at Memorial Attended by 90,000 People

Charlie Kirk’s memorial service in Arizona drew approximately 90,000 attendees, marking it as one of the largest tributes for a private citizen in recent history.

On Sunday, a remarkable gathering took place in Glendale, Arizona, as roughly 90,000 people came together to honor Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA). This memorial service stands out as one of the largest public turnouts for a private citizen in recent memory.

According to estimates from TPUSA, around 70,000 attendees filled the State Farm Stadium to capacity, while an additional 10,000 people gathered at the nearby Desert Diamond Arena, designated as an overflow venue. Another 10,000 individuals watched the service from nearby viewing areas, underscoring the extraordinary scale of the event.

While earlier estimates from law enforcement officials suggested attendance could reach around 200,000, the final count still highlighted the significant public interest in Kirk’s life and legacy.

The memorial service featured a lineup of political heavyweights, conservative media figures, and religious leaders, making it one of the largest public gatherings ever organized for a private citizen. The event was broadcast across every major U.S. television network, as noted by White House Communications Director Steven Cheung.

Kirk’s memorial also showcased the unique intersection of politics, media, and faith that characterized his public persona. Such large-scale memorials are not unprecedented, as history has seen similar outpourings for cultural icons. For instance, the death of Elvis Presley in 1977 attracted an estimated 80,000 people to the streets of Memphis for his funeral procession, although only a few hundred were allowed inside the venue.

In June 2016, approximately 14,000 people attended the memorial service for legendary heavyweight boxing champion Muhammad Ali in Louisville, Kentucky, with thousands more tuning in via live streams. Additionally, the passing of Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968 was marked by two massive services in Atlanta, where an estimated 150,000 people gathered to witness his funeral procession.

Charlie Kirk was tragically assassinated on September 10 during an outdoor event at Utah Valley University, which was the inaugural stop on TPUSA’s planned American Comeback Tour. Known for his engaging debates on college campuses, Kirk was in the midst of fielding open-mic questions from a crowd of thousands when a single shot ended his life.

The profound impact of Kirk’s life and work was evident in the overwhelming turnout at his memorial, reflecting the deep connection he fostered with his supporters and the broader community.

Source: Original article

Kash Patel Expresses Pride in Leading FBI After Heated Hearing

FBI Director Kash Patel faced intense scrutiny during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing but remained defiant, asserting his pride in leading the agency and its historic recruitment efforts.

FBI Director Kash Patel faced significant criticism from Democratic senators during a recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, yet he remained resolute, stating that he is “proud” to lead the nation’s foremost investigative agency. Following the hearing, Patel emphasized the FBI’s record recruitment efforts, claiming that the agency has received the highest number of applications for FBI agents and intelligence analysts in its history.

One of the primary points of contention during the hearing was Patel’s earlier social media post, in which he mistakenly stated that the alleged killer of conservative leader Charlie Kirk was in custody. While Patel acknowledged that he could have phrased his post more carefully, he maintained that he does not regret it, asserting that it was made in the spirit of transparency.

In his remarks after the hearing, Patel noted, “The American people are seeing and hearing what the FBI is doing on a daily basis, crushing violent crime and defending the homeland.” He expressed pride in leading an agency that has experienced unprecedented growth in its application pool, stating, “I’m proud to be the director of the FBI that has seen the most significant, expansive application pool in history.”

During his opening statement to the committee, Patel highlighted several accomplishments of the FBI since President Donald Trump took office, including tens of thousands of arrests, a reorganization of the agency, and a renewed focus on combating illicit drugs. Despite the mounting criticism regarding his leadership, Patel challenged lawmakers to confront him directly, declaring, “I’m not going anywhere,” and inviting them to critique his 16 years of service.

Patel also faced scrutiny over a series of firings at the FBI, which some have alleged were politically motivated. Ranking member Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., criticized Patel for his perceived loyalty to Trump, claiming that the director has appointed “MAGA loyalists” to key positions and instituted internal “loyalty tests,” including polygraph examinations. Durbin further alleged that some FBI officials who failed these tests required waivers to remain employed at the bureau.

Additionally, Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, questioned Patel about a requirement for FBI field agents to perform push-ups as part of their physical fitness standards. Hirono expressed concern that this requirement could disproportionately affect female agents, asking, “There are concerns about whether or not being able to do these kinds of harsh pull-ups is really required of FBI agents.” In response, Patel asserted, “If you want to chase down a bad guy, excuse me, and put him in handcuffs, you had better be able to do a pull-up.”

In a particularly heated exchange, Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., warned Patel, “I think you’re not going to be around long,” suggesting that this might be his last oversight hearing. Booker criticized Patel for his allegiance to Trump rather than the Constitution, stating, “Donald Trump has shown us in his first term, and in this term, he is not loyal to people like you.” Patel countered Booker’s remarks, asserting that the senator’s “rant of false information does not bring this country together,” and added, “It’s my time, not yours.”

As the hearing concluded, Patel’s defiance and commitment to the FBI’s mission were clear, even in the face of mounting criticism from lawmakers. His tenure as director continues to be marked by controversy, but he remains steadfast in his role and the agency’s objectives.

Source: Original article

Nayna Gupta Discusses Deportation’s Impact on Families at Shadow Hearing

Nayna Gupta, Policy Director of the American Immigration Council, testified at a Shadow Hearing on September 18, 2025, addressing the severe impacts of deportation on families and communities.

On September 18, 2025, Nayna Gupta, the Policy Director of the American Immigration Council, provided crucial testimony at a Shadow Hearing organized by U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal, who serves as the Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Immigration, Integrity, Security, and Enforcement.

The hearing, titled “Kidnapped and Disappeared: Trump’s Assault Destroys U.S. Families and Communities,” marks the third installment in Rep. Jayapal’s series focused on the profound human costs associated with deportation policies.

During her testimony, Gupta emphasized the multifaceted consequences of these policies, which she argued have far-reaching effects on both individuals and society as a whole.

One of the key points Gupta raised was the way deportation policies tear apart families and destabilize communities. She illustrated how these actions not only affect the individuals being deported but also have a ripple effect on their loved ones and the broader community.

Gupta also pointed out that such policies undermine due process and fairness within the U.S. immigration system. She argued that the current framework often lacks the necessary protections for individuals, leading to unjust outcomes.

Furthermore, Gupta highlighted that these deportation practices weaken the core values of justice and dignity that should define America. She called for a reevaluation of the immigration system to better align with these fundamental principles.

The American Immigration Council remains committed to advocating for an immigration system that prioritizes family unity, upholds due process, and reflects the ideals of justice and dignity.

As the conversation around immigration continues to evolve, Gupta’s testimony serves as a poignant reminder of the human impact behind policy decisions.

According to the American Immigration Council, the ongoing discourse is essential for fostering a more humane and just immigration system.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Emphasizes Patriotic Education in Federal Grant Programs

The Trump administration has introduced a new federal education grant priority focused on promoting “patriotic education” in American schools, emphasizing a positive portrayal of the nation’s history.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Trump administration has unveiled a new supplemental priority for federal education grants, aimed at fostering what it describes as “patriotic education” in American schools. This proposal, announced on September 17, represents the fifth such priority under the guidance of U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon and will shape future discretionary grant awards by the U.S. Department of Education.

In an official statement, the department indicated that this new priority will be utilized in grant competitions to encourage a “civic education that teaches American history, values, and geography with an unbiased approach.” Secretary McMahon emphasized the importance of an education system that conveys America’s founding principles, political institutions, and rich history honestly, stating, “It is imperative to promote an education system that teaches future generations honestly about America’s Founding principles, political institutions, and rich history… to inspire an informed patriotism and love of country.”

According to the department, “patriotic education” aims to present American history in a manner that is “accurate, honest, and inspiring.” The initiative will focus on an “uplifting portrayal” of the nation’s founding ideals while also acknowledging the progress made through the efforts of civil rights heroes who fought to extend the protections of the U.S. Constitution to all citizens.

This initiative is particularly timely as the nation approaches the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence in 2026. The proposed priority has been published in the Federal Register and is currently open for public comment for 30 days before it is finalized. Following this period, the Education Department plans to incorporate the feedback into its grantmaking decisions related to civic and history education.

The emphasis on patriotic education has garnered attention, reflecting a broader trend in educational policy that seeks to instill a sense of national pride and historical awareness among students. The administration’s approach has sparked discussions about the role of education in shaping civic identity and the narratives presented in American history.

As the public comment period progresses, stakeholders in education, including teachers, parents, and policymakers, will have the opportunity to voice their opinions on the proposed priority. The outcome of this initiative could significantly influence the direction of educational content and funding in the years to come.

According to ANI, the Education Department aims to create a framework that not only celebrates American achievements but also addresses the complexities of the nation’s history.

Source: Original article

Lawmakers Address Hateful Political Rhetoric After Kirk Assassination

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, lawmakers are grappling with the influence of political rhetoric and gun violence on the rising tide of political violence in the United States.

The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has ignited a contentious debate among lawmakers regarding the role of political rhetoric in the increasing incidents of political violence. While both Republicans and Democrats have condemned violence, they diverge on the extent to which inflammatory language contributes to the current crisis.

Some Republican lawmakers have pointed fingers at what they describe as a “culture of assassination” fostered by the left’s rhetoric. Conversely, Democrats have accused Republicans of undermining free speech in their responses to political violence. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., emphasized the need to focus on gun control rather than rhetoric as a primary factor in the rise of political violence. “This isn’t just about what happened to Charlie Kirk,” she stated. “At the same time his tragic killing was happening, three kids were getting shot in school, and that was one or two weeks after another couple of kids were getting shot, in church, at mass, at a Catholic school.”

In stark contrast, GOP Representative Nancy Mace, R-S.C., did not hold back in her criticism of those who she believes incite hatred toward conservatives. “We need to shame these people out of polite society, shame them out of existence. They need to be fired from their jobs. They are putting lives in danger,” Mace asserted. “They are denying that they’re celebrating the political assassination and murder of Charlie Kirk, but they’re liars. They’re lying through their teeth.”

Lawmakers from both parties have called for a reduction in heated rhetoric following Kirk’s assassination. Many Americans, including K-12 education officials, college professors, healthcare professionals, political commentators, and writers, have faced backlash for their reactions to Kirk’s death. This includes professionals from various sectors and major companies, such as Perkins Coie, the law firm associated with the New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ, and Office Depot.

Representative Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., underscored the importance of free speech, warning that America’s democratic tradition could be jeopardized if open discourse is stifled. “Look, there’s a limit to what Congress can do, because we have the First Amendment, which protects all forms of speech, including hate speech,” Torres explained. “But we should have a culture of condemning any rhetoric that glorifies violence. I see violence as the downfall of American democracy. We all should have the right to speak freely, to think freely, without fear of harassment or intimidation or violence. And once we lose the ability to speak freely in the public square, then democracy as we know it has come to an end.”

Representative Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., proposed potential measures Congress could explore to mitigate inflammatory rhetoric and its possible effects on violence. “You have to look at the role that social media companies play in allowing violent rhetoric to be on their sites,” Swalwell noted. “And what more can we do so that law enforcement can see these attacks sooner? I wait, and stand ready to learn, where there are signs that were missed by law enforcement. Because if that’s the case, we have to do better, because the temperature is only increasing.”

As the nation grapples with the implications of Kirk’s assassination, the discussion surrounding political rhetoric and its consequences remains a pressing concern for lawmakers and citizens alike.

Source: Original article

Weight Loss Drugs May Extend Lifespan for Americans, Researchers Say

New research suggests that GLP-1 weight loss drugs could significantly reduce mortality rates in the U.S. by 2045, addressing obesity’s role in leading causes of death.

A recent study indicates that GLP-1 drugs, commonly used for diabetes and weight loss, could lead to a notable decrease in mortality rates among Americans. Researchers from Swiss Re, a reinsurance company based in Zurich, Switzerland, project that these medications could result in a 6.4% reduction in all-cause mortality in the United States by the year 2045. In comparison, the United Kingdom is expected to see a reduction of over 5% in mortality rates over the same period.

Both the U.S. and the U.K. are grappling with high obesity rates and have seen a “strong uptake” of GLP-1 drugs, according to the researchers’ findings. The United States has the highest obesity rate in the world, with more than 40% of adults classified as obese. In the U.K., approximately 30% of adults fall into the same category.

Obesity is a significant factor contributing to the stagnation of life expectancy, as it is linked to 70% of the leading causes of death in high-income countries. These causes include heart disease, stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, and various forms of cancer. The researchers noted that by improving baseline risk factors, GLP-1 drugs could lead to long-term reductions in mortality, potentially saving millions from premature death.

To maximize the benefits of GLP-1 medications, experts emphasize the importance of implementing lifestyle changes that promote long-term health improvements. Without sustainable changes such as diet and exercise, individuals may experience weight regain and rebound effects, as supported by various studies.

Paul Murray, the CEO of Life & Health Reinsurance at Swiss Re, highlighted the potential of GLP-1 drugs to combat the obesity epidemic. In a press release, he stated, “Our research underscores that the full benefit will come from going beyond medication.” He added that insurers have a unique opportunity to foster partnerships, support policy initiatives, and encourage individuals to make meaningful lifestyle changes focused on prevention.

Murray further noted, “If we get this right, we can strengthen the insurance safety net and contribute to people living longer, healthier lives.”

Recent findings also indicate that GLP-1 medications can improve a range of health conditions beyond weight loss and diabetes. These include issues related to heart health, kidney function, liver conditions, skin disorders, arthritis, cognitive decline, addiction, and even certain cancers.

Dr. Sue Decotiis, a triple board-certified weight loss physician based in New York, confirmed in an interview that patients have reported improvements in various health conditions while using these medications. She explained that fat cells, which are reduced through the action of GLP-1 drugs, produce cytokines that can lead to inflammation in the body. This inflammation is associated with autoimmune diseases, cancer, and other health issues.

“By reducing the volume of fat cells in the body, we reduce all these inflammatory cytokines,” Dr. Decotiis stated. “And that’s why we see a lot of the effects that we see.” She emphasized the importance of using these medications responsibly, treating both the drugs and the body with respect. “This is a wonderful tool if it’s used the right way,” she added.

As the research unfolds, the potential of GLP-1 drugs to enhance public health and extend life expectancy appears promising, provided that individuals also commit to healthier lifestyles.

Source: Original article

Trump References Churchill Amid Growing Concerns Over UK Free Speech

President Donald Trump praised the U.S.-U.K. “special relationship” during a state dinner with King Charles III, addressing ongoing concerns about free speech in the U.K.

During a state dinner at Windsor Castle on Wednesday night, President Donald Trump highlighted the enduring “special relationship” between the United States and the United Kingdom. His remarks came amid ongoing debates regarding free speech in the U.K.

In his toast, Trump referenced the historical bond that inspired Sir Winston Churchill, stating, “His Majesty spoke eloquently about the bond which inspired Sir Winston Churchill – the bust is in the Oval Office right now – the beautiful bust of Winston Churchill, to coin the phrase ‘special relationship,’ but seen from American eyes, the word ‘special’ does not begin to do it justice.” He emphasized the connections shared by the two nations, describing them as “joined by history and fate, by love and language and by transcendent ties of culture, tradition, ancestry and destiny.”

Trump’s remarks came during an unprecedented second state visit, which included King Charles and other members of the royal family, as well as First Lady Melania Trump. Traditionally, royal events tend to avoid partisan issues, with the royal family maintaining a neutral stance on contentious topics. However, Trump has previously deviated from this norm.

While his toast appeared to remain politically neutral, it touched on a sensitive issue that has sparked controversy in both the U.S. and the U.K. in recent months: free speech. “The British Empire laid the foundations of law, liberty, free speech and individual rights virtually everywhere the Union Jack has ever flown, including a place called America,” Trump stated. This comment could raise eyebrows, particularly as the U.K. government faces criticism regarding its approach to free speech.

In recent months, U.K. online safety laws have become a contentious topic, drawing heated political debate not only within Britain but also among American leaders. Vice President JD Vance, who was not present at the state dinner, has been vocal about these issues. Critics, including right-wing Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, have described the U.K.’s approach to free speech as an “authoritarian” crackdown, comparing it to laws seen in countries like North Korea.

As discussions surrounding free speech continue to evolve, Trump’s remarks at Windsor Castle underscore the complexities of the U.S.-U.K. relationship and the shared values that both nations hold dear.

Source: Original article

Squad Member Responds to Claims of Democratic Celebration of Political Violence

Rep. Ilhan Omar denied that Democratic voters are celebrating the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, despite evidence of backlash against those who have mocked his death.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota and member of the progressive group known as “the Squad,” has refuted claims that Democratic voters are celebrating the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. In a recent interview, Omar was confronted with questions regarding the rhetoric surrounding Kirk’s death and whether she believed there was a celebration of political violence among Democratic constituents.

In video footage obtained by Fox News Digital, Omar was asked directly about her concerns regarding the Democratic base’s response to Kirk’s assassination. When pressed on whether Democratic voters were celebrating political violence, Omar responded, “I don’t think anybody is.” This assertion comes despite a growing number of professionals across various sectors facing repercussions for mocking or praising Kirk’s death.

Professionals from K-12 education officials to healthcare workers and political commentators have experienced backlash for their comments regarding Kirk’s assassination. Notably, the law firm Perkins Coie, which is associated with major entities like the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ, has also been implicated in this controversy.

Following Kirk’s assassination, lawmakers from both parties have condemned the rise of political violence. However, contentious moments have still surfaced in Congress. On the day of Kirk’s death, a moment of silence in the House Chamber turned chaotic when Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert of South Carolina requested a spoken prayer in addition to the silent tribute. This request was met with protests from Democratic members, some of whom reportedly shouted about the lack of attention given to a school shooting that occurred on the same day as Kirk’s assassination. In response, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican from Florida, shouted back, “You all caused this.”

When Omar was asked why Democrats did not offer a prayer for Kirk, she stated, “We did a moment of silence; nobody prays on the House floor for anybody who has passed away.” Her comments reflect a broader tension within Congress regarding how to address the implications of political violence.

Omar is currently facing efforts from Republican lawmakers to strip her of her committee assignments, stemming from her comments about Kirk shortly after his assassination. In an interview with the progressive news outlet Zeteo, Omar criticized Kirk’s legacy, stating that he had previously “downplayed slavery and what Black people have gone through in this country by saying Juneteenth shouldn’t exist.”

Omar further elaborated on her views, asserting that many who claim Kirk wanted to engage in civil debate are ignoring the documented history of his words and actions over the past decade. “There are a lot of people who are out there talking about him just wanting to have a civil debate,” she said. “There is nothing more effed up, you know, than to completely pretend that, you know, his words and actions have not been recorded and in existence for the last decade or so.”

In her remarks, Omar also took aim at GOP figures who have criticized Democrats for their rhetoric following Kirk’s assassination. “These people are full of s—,” she stated. “And it’s important for us to call them out while we feel anger and sadness, and have, you know, empathy, which Charlie said, ‘No, it shouldn’t exist,’ because that’s a newly created word or something,” referring to Kirk’s comments about “hate speech.”

The ongoing debate surrounding Kirk’s assassination and the subsequent reactions from both sides of the political spectrum highlight the increasingly polarized nature of American politics. As discussions continue, the implications of political violence remain a pressing concern for lawmakers and citizens alike.

Source: Original article

Trump Travels to UK for Second State Visit, Then to Arizona

President Donald Trump is set for a rare second state visit to the UK, followed by a trip to Arizona for the funeral of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

President Donald Trump will embark on a state visit to the United Kingdom this week, marking only his second such visit during his presidency. Following his time in the UK, Trump will travel to Arizona to attend the funeral of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

This return to England is notable, as U.S. presidents typically make only one state visit during their time in office. The significance of this occasion is underscored by both its political and symbolic weight.

During the visit, Trump and First Lady Melania Trump will be hosted by King Charles III and Queen Camilla at Windsor Castle, as Buckingham Palace is currently undergoing renovations. The couple will also meet with Prince William and Princess Catherine of Wales during their stay.

The state visit will begin with a formal welcome, followed by a series of ceremonial events that include a carriage procession, a gun salute, and a military flyover. The festivities will culminate in a lavish state dinner, which typically invites around 150 guests who are chosen based on their cultural, diplomatic, or economic ties to the host nation.

Darren McGrady, a former personal chef to the late Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Diana, emphasized the importance of getting the menu right for such an occasion. McGrady, who served as a royal chef for 15 years and cooked for five U.S. presidents, noted that there is no room for error when it comes to the culinary offerings at a state dinner.

On Thursday, Trump will travel to Chequers, the official country residence of the UK prime minister, where he will meet with Prime Minister Keir Starmer. This meeting will include a series of bilateral discussions, followed by a joint news conference later that day.

Trump, who is 79 years old, and King Charles, aged 76, have known each other for decades, with their relationship dating back to Charles’s visit to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in the late 1980s. More recently, King Charles sent Trump a personal note after Trump survived an assassination attempt during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

After concluding his UK visit, Trump will head to Arizona to attend the funeral of Charlie Kirk, who was tragically assassinated during an outdoor debate at Utah Valley University. Kirk, the charismatic founder of Turning Point USA, was shot on Wednesday, prompting an outpouring of grief and support from his followers.

In the wake of her husband’s death, Kirk’s widow, Erika, expressed her determination to carry on his mission. “To everyone listening tonight across America, the movement my husband built will not die,” she stated in a video message. “I refuse to let that happen. No one will ever forget my husband’s name. And I will make sure of it. It will become stronger. Bolder. Louder and greater than ever,” she affirmed.

Andrew Kolvet, executive producer of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” shared on social media that Turning Point USA has received over 32,000 inquiries from individuals interested in starting new campus chapters in the wake of Kirk’s assassination. In a separate post, Kolvet remarked, “This is the Turning Point.”

Trump’s dual engagements this week highlight significant moments in both international relations and domestic political discourse, reflecting the ongoing impact of influential figures in American conservatism.

Source: Original article

More Children Worldwide Now Obese Than Underweight, WHO Reports

For the first time in history, more children globally are classified as obese than underweight, according to a new UNICEF report highlighting a concerning trend in childhood nutrition.

Global childhood obesity rates have tripled between 2000 and 2022, driven largely by the prevalence of ultra-processed foods and aggressive junk food marketing, according to a recent analysis by UNICEF. This alarming trend has emerged in over 190 countries, marking a significant shift in the nutritional landscape for children.

For the first time ever, the number of children classified as obese has surpassed those who are underweight. UNICEF’s findings indicate that approximately one in ten school-aged children—around 188 million worldwide—meets the World Health Organization’s criteria for obesity. Additionally, one in five children under the age of 19, or about 391 million, is considered overweight. The distinction between overweight and obesity is critical, as obesity represents a more severe condition that significantly increases the risk of serious health issues later in life.

Between 2000 and 2022, the global obesity rate among children aged five to 19 surged from 3% to 9.4%. During the same period, the prevalence of underweight children declined from nearly 13% to 9.2%. “When we talk about malnutrition, we are no longer just talking about underweight children,” stated UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell in a press release. She emphasized that the rise of ultra-processed foods is replacing essential nutrients found in fruits, vegetables, and proteins, which are vital for children’s growth, cognitive development, and mental health.

While undernutrition remains a significant issue in many parts of the world, obesity has become increasingly common, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The report identifies obesity hotspots, revealing that rates have doubled since the 2000s, even in regions still grappling with undernutrition. In small Pacific Island nations like Niue and the Cook Islands, nearly 40% of young people are classified as obese.

In wealthier nations, the consumption of ultra-processed foods has reached alarming levels, with these foods accounting for more than half of adolescents’ caloric intake. In Chile, for instance, 27% of children aged five to 19 are living with obesity, while the rates in the United States and the United Arab Emirates stand at 21%.

In response to this growing crisis, health professionals in affluent countries like the U.S. are increasingly advocating for the use of new weight-loss medications for teenagers. “Obesity is not a failure of parents or children. It’s the result of toxic food environments,” remarked Chris Van Tulleken, a professor and UNICEF supporter, in an interview with Reuters.

The report highlights the serious health risks associated with obesity, including a higher likelihood of developing insulin resistance, high blood pressure, Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain types of cancer. Experts attribute the rise in obesity not only to the consumption of ultra-processed foods high in salt, sugar, and fat but also to the pervasive marketing of junk food.

A survey conducted by UNICEF involving 64,000 young people across 170 countries revealed that 75% had encountered advertisements for sugary drinks, snacks, or fast food in the previous week. Alarmingly, even in conflict zones, 68% of respondents reported exposure to such advertising. In low-income countries, 65% of young people were similarly exposed, often through schools, social media, sporting events, and children’s programming.

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. recently released the “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) report, which underscores the role of ultra-processed foods, sedentary lifestyles, and various environmental and dietary factors in the rising rates of obesity and chronic disease among American children. The report indicates that the administration will consider developing guidelines to limit the direct marketing of unhealthy foods to children.

UNICEF is calling on governments worldwide to take immediate action by imposing restrictions on junk food marketing and banning unhealthy products in schools. In Mexico, where childhood obesity is prevalent and sugary drinks and ultra-processed foods constitute 40% of children’s daily caloric intake, the government has already enacted a ban on the sale and distribution of these products in public schools.

The agency warns that without swift and decisive action, the ongoing trend of rising childhood obesity threatens to lead to a surge in diabetes, heart disease, and other serious health problems for future generations.

Source: Original article

Complete Mastodon Jaw Discovered in New York Homeowner’s Backyard

A complete mastodon jaw discovered in a New York backyard will undergo scientific analysis before being displayed to the public in 2025.

A remarkable discovery has been made in Scotchtown, New York, where a homeowner unearthed a complete mastodon jaw in their backyard. This extinct mammal, closely related to modern elephants, was excavated by researchers from the New York State Museum and SUNY Orange.

The jaw, along with several bone fragments, was found after the homeowner noticed two unusual teeth hidden among plant fronds. Intrigued, they dug deeper and uncovered two additional teeth just inches below the surface. The New York State Museum stated that the fossils will undergo carbon dating and extensive scientific analysis to determine the mastodon’s age, diet, and habitat.

Once preserved and studied, the jaw and related findings are set to be showcased in public programming in 2025, providing visitors with a glimpse into New York’s rich Ice Age history. The museum emphasized the significance of this discovery, noting that it is the first of its kind in New York in 11 years and is being referred to as a “prehistoric treasure.”

The Albany-based museum reported that excavation efforts revealed a full, well-preserved mastodon jaw belonging to an adult individual. In addition to the jaw, researchers recovered a piece of a toe bone and a rib fragment, which offer valuable insights into the mastodon’s life and environment.

According to museum officials, approximately 150 mastodon fossils have been found throughout New York, with a third of those discoveries originating from Orange County, where this jaw was located. Cory Harris, Chair of SUNY Orange’s Behavioral Sciences Department, remarked, “While the jaw is the star of the show, the additional toe and rib fragments offer valuable context and the potential for additional research.” He also expressed hope for further exploration of the immediate area to uncover more preserved bones.

This discovery not only highlights the rich prehistoric history of the region but also underscores the importance of citizen engagement in scientific research. The homeowner, who recognized the significance of their find, expressed their excitement, stating, “When I found the teeth and examined them in my hands, I knew they were something special and decided to call in the experts. I’m thrilled that our property has yielded such an important find for the scientific community.”

As the scientific community prepares to analyze the mastodon jaw, it promises to contribute significantly to our understanding of these ancient creatures and their environments.

Source: Original article

Montana GOP Representative Ryan Zinke Calls Charlie Kirk Assassination ‘Watershed Moment’

Montana Congressman Ryan Zinke described the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk as a “watershed moment,” emphasizing the need for civil political discourse without violence.

Rep. Ryan Zinke, a Republican from Montana, characterized the recent assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk as a “watershed moment.” He underscored the importance of maintaining civil political discourse, asserting that Americans should be able to engage in political disagreements without resorting to violence.

Zinke made these remarks during an appearance on NewsNation’s program “The Hill” on Friday. He referenced earlier comments made by Utah Governor Spencer Cox, expressing disappointment that differing political viewpoints have led to violent confrontations.

“We should look and reflect,” Zinke stated. “As the governor pointed out, this is a watershed moment. So, the watershed moment depends on what this country does.” He posed a critical question: “Are we going to continue this? Are we going to continue to not be able to have dialogue and talk to your neighbor?”

Kirk, who was 31 years old and co-founder of Turning Point USA, was shot on the campus of Utah Valley University on Wednesday afternoon. He was transported to a hospital in critical condition but was later pronounced dead. The alleged shooter, identified as 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, turned himself in after a multi-day manhunt, reportedly encouraged by his family.

During a news conference on Friday, Governor Cox called for civility and urged individuals on both sides of the political spectrum to de-escalate tensions and “choose a different path.” He stated, “This is our moment: Do we escalate, or do we find an off-ramp? It’s a choice.”

In an emotional reflection, Cox shared, “For the last 48 hours, I have been as angry as I have ever been, as sad as I have ever been … and as anger pushed me to the brink, it was actually Charlie’s words that pushed me back. Charlie said, ‘When people stop talking, that’s when you get violence.'” This sentiment resonated with Zinke, who similarly called for political dialogue devoid of violence.

Zinke expressed concern over disheartening statements he has observed on social media following recent incidents of political violence. He remarked, “You see, you know, an assassination attempt. You see a political assassination in Minnesota. You see one with Charlie Kirk. You know a father. You know a great patriot, a loving husband. You know, assassinated. And ironically, his assassination was over his message, which was, ‘Let’s have a dialogue. Let’s talk.'”

He further emphasized, “In our country, the strength is that we may agree or disagree, but disagreement should never result in violence.” Zinke also referenced a June incident in which Vance Boelter was charged with the murders of former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman, her husband Mark, and their dog at their Minneapolis home. Boelter was also charged with shooting Minnesota state Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, and for attempting to shoot their daughter, Hope.

Other recent acts of political violence include assassination attempts against former President Donald Trump and the attack on Paul Pelosi, the husband of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, with a hammer in 2022.

Zinke’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding his statements.

Source: Original article

Two Shootings Raise Concerns Among Indian-American Communities

Recent events in the U.S., including a mass shooting and ongoing tariff disputes with India, highlight complex issues of ideology and international relations.

Chicago: As the Indian media focused on U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs and his aide Peter Navarro’s critical remarks about India and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a tragic mass shooting unfolded in the United States.

While the two events may seem unrelated at first glance, they share a common thread of anti-India sentiment. Observers note that the ideologies of transgederism, antisemitism, jihadism, and anti-India bigotry are interconnected in troubling ways.

The Annunciation Catholic Church Shooting

On Wednesday, August 27, 2025, the new school year began at The Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Just before 8:30 a.m., as children gathered at the church for Mass, a shooting erupted. The school serves students from preschool through eighth grade and is affiliated with the historic Annunciation Catholic Church.

The shooter, identified by law enforcement as 23-year-old Robin (born Robert) Westman, opened fire through the church’s stained glass windows. Tragically, the attack resulted in the deaths of two children, aged 8 and 10, and left 18 others injured. Westman ultimately died by suicide at the scene.

Reports indicate that Westman was a mentally disturbed individual radicalized by leftist jihadist ideology. A manifesto revealed violent fantasies against children, along with a detailed seating map of the church. In addition to anti-Catholic slurs, Westman’s writings included threats against “filthy Zionist Jews” and inscriptions on weapons that read “NUKE INDIA,” “Kill Donald Trump,” and “Israel Must Fall.”

This incident is not isolated; the U.S. has witnessed several high-profile cases of violence involving transgender individuals in recent years. In March 2023, Aiden Hale, a 28-year-old who identified as transgender, killed three children and three staff members at The Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee. Hale’s manifesto referenced the Columbine High School massacre, indicating a troubling pattern of violence.

In November 2022, Anderson Lee Aldrich, who identifies as nonbinary, fatally shot five people and injured 40 others at Club Q, an LGBTQ nightclub in Colorado Springs. Aldrich was subdued by patrons and later sentenced to life in prison.

Critics argue that transgenderism represents a radical ideology that dismisses biological realities. Jessica Hart Steinmann and Leigh Ann O’Neill have noted that it teaches individuals to suppress their instincts and question the fairness of protective rules designed for their safety.

Despite the progressive narrative surrounding Hindu society, traditional Hindu values were not intended for social engineering, and many overlook this fact.

As is often the case following mass shootings in the U.S., the Annunciation Catholic Church shooting ignited a wave of liberal commentary regarding gun laws. The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms, which has become a contentious issue in American politics. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey criticized the focus on “thoughts and prayers,” emphasizing the gravity of the situation as children prayed in a church during their first week of school.

Tariffs and U.S.-India Relations

The U.S.-India relationship is currently facing significant challenges, particularly during the Modi administration. Tariffs and the purchase of Russian oil are not new issues in this bilateral relationship.

During Trump’s first term, tariffs were a major point of contention, with high tariffs on products like Harley-Davidson motorcycles causing friction. In March 2019, the U.S. revoked India’s Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) status, which allowed certain products from India to enter the U.S. duty-free.

More recently, President Joe Biden’s administration has taken a hard stance on India’s compliance with U.S. sanctions. Deputy National Security Advisor Daleep Singh, of Indian descent, warned India of “consequences” for its actions, while Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland imposed a stealth visa ban on Indians for failing to comply with U.S. sanctions on Russia. This led to significant delays for Indians seeking visa appointments.

Senior journalist Prof. M.D. Nalapat noted that Nuland was frustrated by India’s refusal to abandon the S-400 missile deal with Russia, highlighting the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in the region.

Walter Russell Mead, a distinguished fellow at the Hudson Institute, recently suggested a shift toward protectionism in the Indo-Pacific, indicating a bipartisan move away from trade policies that promote export-oriented growth in developing economies. This shift may require India to align its policies with U.S. strategic interests, which include countering Chinese aggression and stabilizing the Middle East.

The Tragic Death of Charlie Kirk

As these discussions unfolded, the tragic news of the killing of Charlie Kirk, a 31-year-old conservative activist, emerged. Kirk was instrumental in mobilizing young voters for Trump’s 2024 campaign through his organization, Turning Point USA.

A college dropout, Kirk was known for engaging with students on college campuses about faith, family, and conservative values. His assassination on a campus—an institution meant to foster diverse ideas and free speech—serves as a grim reminder of the rising violence against conservative voices in America.

These events collectively underscore the complexities of contemporary American society, where ideological battles intersect with issues of safety, policy, and international relations.

Source: Original article

American Veterans Encounter Hamas Threats While Providing Aid in Gaza

American veterans are delivering vital aid to Palestinians in Gaza, navigating threats from Hamas while working with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to provide food and assistance to those in need.

American veterans are collaborating with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) to deliver essential aid to Palestinians affected by nearly two years of conflict. As the situation in Gaza continues to deteriorate, these veterans are committed to ensuring that those in need receive the food and support necessary for survival.

Jason Murray, Scott Weimer, and Brandon Zielinski, all U.S. military veterans, are actively involved in GHF’s operations. They recently shared their experiences with Fox News Digital, expressing pride in their humanitarian efforts. “We kind of built a plane in flight… not even knowing where we were going to land,” Murray remarked, reflecting on the challenges they face in their mission.

Founded in May 2025, GHF began its work more than a year and a half after the onset of the war. The organization has encountered significant obstacles in distributing aid within Gaza. Murray noted that his military background has been instrumental in navigating these challenges as a volunteer with GHF.

Weimer described his involvement as a “natural fit,” emphasizing that his military experience, along with that of his colleagues, has equipped them to identify and utilize the skills of others effectively in this complex environment. Zielinski highlighted his past experiences with bilateral training, which often required overcoming language barriers, as beneficial in his interactions with the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), who coordinate with GHF.

The veterans conveyed the urgency of the situation, recounting the desperation they witnessed among hungry Palestinians seeking food. They also noted the presence of bad actors, including Hamas operatives and gang members, who pose threats to those working with GHF, particularly local Palestinians.

Murray provided insight into how GHF collaborates with the IDF to maintain security during aid distribution. “From a security standpoint, our goal is to provide aid in a safe and secure manner. Hamas does operate in this area. Again, we know that,” he explained. The threat posed by Hamas is a serious concern for GHF personnel, who remain vigilant in their efforts to deliver assistance.

Weimer echoed Murray’s observations, stating that GHF personnel are acutely aware of Hamas’s presence. However, their primary focus remains on delivering aid to those in need. He praised Zielinski’s team for their ability to manage the overwhelming demand for food and assistance while maintaining composure in potentially dangerous situations. “I have never once seen any of us overreact to what would be, I think, to anybody, a very scary situation,” Weimer remarked.

Before commencing their work, Zielinski’s team typically receives a briefing from the IDF regarding the security situation over the previous 48 hours. He noted that the secure distribution sites (SDS) have evolved in response to the ongoing threats. “We’ve had pistols seen before, there’s been AKs seen before. There’s grenades that went off,” Zielinski recounted, emphasizing the need for vigilance. His team actively monitors patterns and reports suspicious activities to intelligence officials, contributing to efforts to identify potential threats.

When asked what the American public should understand about the realities on the ground in Gaza, the veterans urged for more informed perspectives. Weimer expressed frustration with media portrayals of GHF, stating that they are often “so far askew.” He encouraged his family and the public to seek the truth, asserting, “These people that are here, these military veterans that lived a long honorable life, we would never be a part of something [like] what I’ve seen in the media.” He described the misrepresentation as disheartening.

Zielinski emphasized the dedication of GHF volunteers, who are driven by a passion for helping civilians in need. Since its inception, GHF claims to have delivered over 160 million meals to Palestinians. Despite facing threats and criticism, the organization continues to call on the international community to support its mission of providing food and assistance to those affected by the ongoing conflict.

“Everybody wants to help, and everybody sees the reward for doing so… We all just enjoy doing it,” Zielinski concluded, highlighting the collective commitment of the GHF team to their humanitarian efforts.

Source: Original article

Bera Cautions That Planned Parenthood Cuts Endanger Rural Healthcare Access

Representative Ami Bera warns that proposed cuts to Planned Parenthood could significantly harm healthcare access for over a million Americans, particularly in rural areas.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Representative Ami Bera (D-CA), a physician, recently joined fellow members of the Democratic Doctors Caucus and Planned Parenthood Federation of America CEO Alexis McGill Johnson to voice their concerns regarding cuts to Medicaid proposed by Republican lawmakers.

The group highlighted a provision within a law signed by former President Donald Trump, referred to as the “Big, Ugly Bill.” This provision aims to block Medicaid patients from accessing care at Planned Parenthood facilities, a move that could have dire consequences for healthcare access across the country.

Currently, this provision has been temporarily halted by the courts. However, if implemented, it could lead to the closure of up to 200 health centers, jeopardizing care for approximately 1.1 million Medicaid patients who rely on these services.

Bera emphasized that Planned Parenthood offers a wide range of healthcare services that extend beyond reproductive health. “In many communities across this country, they’re the sole provider of primary care services to women and men,” he stated. He pointed out that in rural and underserved areas, these centers often serve as the only source for essential healthcare services, including cancer screenings, STI testing, and chronic disease management.

<p“The impact of Donald Trump’s bill is clear: it takes away primary services and community health center resources from many Americans, particularly those in rural America,” Bera added. He accused Republican lawmakers of deliberately targeting these critical healthcare services.

Bera concluded by reaffirming the commitment of Democratic doctors to oppose these cuts and hold Republicans accountable for their actions, emphasizing the importance of maintaining access to healthcare for all Americans.

Source: Original article

-+=