Donald Trump Accepts  Republican Party’s Presidential Nomination, As He Tramples Party Efforts To Remake His Image

Donald Trump, somber and bandaged, accepted the presidential nomination on Thursday, July 18th, 2024 at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, WI, with a speech that described in detail the assassination attempt that could have ended his life just five days earlier, and laid out a sweeping populist agenda in, particularly on immigration.

In a speech that lasted over an  hour and a half, Trump closed out an emotionally charged convention with an appeal for the country to heal “discord and division” days after he was injured in an assassination attempt — even as he mocked and attacked his opponents.,

Trump made sweeping promises to end inflation and secure the border, but he didn’t outline any plans and mostly used crowd-pleasing talking points. The most specific he got was promising to roll back Biden administration efforts to combat climate change, redirect infrastructure spending and impose steep tariffs.

During the first four nights of the convention, speakers attempted to give Donald Trump, one of the most divisive politicians in recent U.S. history a makeover, describing him as a loving and caring family man whose near-assassination at a rally on Saturday had changed him.

Early in his speech , as he accepted his party’s presidential nomination at the Republican National Convention, it seemed Trump had bought into the carefully orchestrated effort to repackage him as a humbler, unifying figure, more palatable to swing voters who will be crucial to winning the Nov. 5 election.

He said he wanted to be a president for all Americans, including Democrats, and wanted to heal the divided country. “In an age when our politics too often divide us, now is the time to remember that we are all fellow citizens,” Trump said.That new version of Trump lasted barely half an hour.

Then the Trump more familiar to Americans – the bombastic thrower of insults who revels in demonizing his opponents – re-emerged, trampling over the message of unity so painstakingly choreographed by the Republican National Committee this week.

In a rambling 92-minute address that broke the record for the longest convention speech in history, Trump called Democratic President Joe Biden the worst president in U.S. history and the former Democratic House Speaker “crazy Nancy Pelosi,” and accused Democrats of launching judicial witch hunts against him and creating a “planet of war.”

“The Democrat Party should immediately stop weaponizing the justice system and labeling their political opponent as an enemy of democracy, especially since that is not true,” Trump said. “In fact, I am the one saving democracy for the people of our country,” he said.

Using familiar hyperbolic and divisive language, he said illegal immigration to the United States was “the greatest invasion in history” and was leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans every year, though neither claim is supported by any data.

He again promised to curb illegal immigration, vowing the “largest deportation operation in the history of our country”, and said he would “end every single international crisis that the current administration has created”.

Trump also said he would create a version of Israel’s Iron Dome missile defence system, and pledged to restore “peace, stability and harmony all throughout the world” – though he gave few details on how.

He painted a dark picture of a crumbling America, a nation in decline, its cities crime-ridden and economically depressed, a staple image of his stump speech in which he presents himself as the country’s savior.

In his debut speech in the role, that man – 39-year-old Ohio Senator JD Vance – told the convention that he was a “working-class” boy, and insisted that Trump’s policies would help left-behind voters.

Among the others who made notable appearances at the convention were Mr Vance’s wife Usha, as well as Trump’s daughter-in-law Lara and his teenage granddaughter Kai, who gave her first public remarks.

And Trump’s former rivals for the Republican nomination, Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, came together to voice their support for him.

Their message of party solidarity was echoed in Thursday’s speech by Trump, who also spoke of working for “all of America” if he won back the White House.

The evening concluded with thousands of balloons falling to the stadium floor and with two prominent figures in the Trump family making rare appearances on the campaign trail. Former first lady Melania Trump made her first public appearance alongside her husband in months when she entered the arena ahead of the former president’s remarks. She later joined him on stage at the conclusion of his speech.

Trump had pledged to re-write his address in the wake of the attack, after which he had what he called a “very cordial” conversation with Mr Biden. The finished item was critical of the current president’s policies, although he spoke his adversary’s name only once during his range of attacks.

Observers said his speech was relatively subdued, in spite of the overall bombast of the evening, which included a shower of balloons and a crowd-rallying appearance from wrestling legend Hulk Hogan.

“We had been told this was going to be a different Trump, a softer side,” Mary Anna Mancuso, a Republican strategist and Trump critic, said afterward. “Trump’s speech was not about unifying the nation. It was the same Trump that we’ve seen and there was no difference.”

Rohit and Kohli Return for ODI Series Against Sri Lanka, Suryakumar Yadav to Lead T20I Side

Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli have informed the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that they will be available for the three-match ODI series against Sri Lanka next month. The BCCI senior selection committee is expected to meet on Thursday evening via a Zoom call, as board secretary Jay Shah is attending the International Cricket Council annual conference in Sri Lanka.

The Ajit Agarkar-led selection committee, in consultation with the BCCI, has decided that Suryakumar Yadav will lead the Indian T20I team for the three-match series, while Rohit Sharma will continue to lead the Indian side in the ODIs. The Indian Express had earlier reported that Suryakumar was likely to captain the T20I side, as the selectors were uncertain about appointing Hardik Pandya as skipper due to his past fitness issues. Pandya was India’s vice-captain during their triumphant T20 World Cup campaign.

The selection committee has informed the BCCI that they are open to replacing Suryakumar as captain in the future if his performance does not meet expectations. The BCCI is considering Suryakumar to lead the Indian team at the 2026 ICC T20 World Cup, which will be held in India and Sri Lanka.

Although Pandya seemed a front-runner for the captaincy, it is understood that BCCI officials and selectors explained their long-term plans to him, highlighting why they preferred Suryakumar for the role.

Meanwhile, the senior players in the team have agreed to the request of newly appointed coach Gautam Gambhir to participate in the three-match ODI series, as it will be his first series as coach.

Pandya will only be playing in the T20Is and will not be part of the ODI squad. The senior selection committee has decided to rest their ace pacer, Jasprit Bumrah, for the short series. Rishabh Pant will feature in both the Indian squads.

Rajasthan Royals middle-order batsman Riyan Parag has pushed his case for a spot in the Indian middle order and is likely to be picked for both the ODI and T20I sides. The selection committee is trying out new faces for the future, and Parag, who can also bowl, is likely to secure a berth in both squads. Parag’s inclusion means Suryakumar will not be part of the ODI squad, and opener Yashasvi Jaiswal will feature only in the T20I squad.

Shreyas Iyer, who last featured in the ICC World Cup 50-over team, will make his way back into the Indian ODI side. The BCCI had excluded Iyer from the annual contract earlier this year, but with his return to international cricket, he will soon be reinstated in the BCCI’s annual contract. Mumbai all-rounder Shivam Dubey is likely to feature in both squads, especially with Pandya opting out of the ODIs.

The BCCI and the selection committee are making strategic decisions to shape the future of Indian cricket. By choosing Suryakumar Yadav as the T20I captain and resting key players like Bumrah, they aim to strike a balance between nurturing new talent and maintaining the team’s competitive edge. With the upcoming series against Sri Lanka, the Indian team will showcase a mix of experienced players and promising newcomers, setting the stage for an exciting cricketing contest.

Irregular Sleep Patterns Linked to Higher Risk of Type 2 Diabetes

Sleeping long hours one night but only a few hours the next can be detrimental to your health, with new research suggesting that inconsistent sleep patterns may increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

The findings “underscore the importance of consistent sleep patterns as a strategy to reduce type 2 diabetes,” according to Sina Kianersi, the lead author of the study and a research fellow at Brigham and Women’s Hospital’s Channing Division of Network Medicine in Boston.

This new study analyzed sleep and health data from over 84,000 participants enrolled in the ongoing UK Biobank Study. The participants, who were on average 62 years old and did not have diabetes at the start of the study, provided a valuable dataset for the researchers.

For a period of seven consecutive nights, participants wore an accelerometer—a watch-like device that tracks movement during sleep.

The researchers then monitored whether these individuals developed type 2 diabetes over the next 7.5 years.

After accounting for various potential confounding factors, Kianersi’s team found a significant association between irregular sleep patterns and an increased risk of type 2 diabetes.

“Irregular” sleep was defined in the study as having a nightly sleep duration that varied by an average of 60 minutes or more.

Individuals with irregular sleep patterns were found to be 34% more likely to develop type 2 diabetes compared to those whose sleep duration remained more consistent.

The study could not definitively explain how fluctuating sleep duration might contribute to the onset of diabetes. However, the researchers theorized that “circadian disruption and sleep disturbances” could be contributing factors.

These findings were published on July 17 in the journal Diabetes Care.

Exceeding Physical Activity Guidelines Significantly Reduces Mortality Risk, Study Finds

Exercise is well-known to benefit health and well-being, but how much moderate or vigorous physical activity is needed to reduce mortality risk? A study in the journal *Circulation* explores this question, detailing the necessary amount and intensity of exercise to lower mortality rates.

The 2018 physical activity guidelines suggest adults engage in 150 to 300 minutes of moderate exercise or 75 to 150 minutes of vigorous exercise weekly, or a combination of both. Moderate activities include walking, weightlifting, and lower-intensity exercises, while vigorous activities encompass running, bicycling, and swimming. Exceeding these recommendations can further decrease mortality risk.

In two large U.S. cohorts, 116,221 adults self-reported their leisure-time physical activity (non-work exercise) through a validated questionnaire, repeated up to 15 times over 30 years. The study revealed that engaging in two to four times the minimum vigorous physical activity recommendations significantly lowered the risk of death from cardiovascular disease. Specifically, those who exercised two to four times above the moderate recommendations (300 to 599 minutes weekly) reaped the most benefits.

Participants exceeding the recommended moderate physical activity had a 26% to 31% lower all-cause mortality and a 28% to 38% lower risk of cardiovascular disease mortality. Additionally, they experienced a 25% to 27% lower risk of non-cardiovascular disease mortality. Adults who performed two to four times the recommended vigorous physical activity (150 to 299 minutes weekly) had a 21% to 23% lower all-cause mortality, a 27% to 33% lower cardiovascular disease mortality, and a 19% lower non-cardiovascular disease mortality.

The study highlighted that combining moderate and vigorous physical activity yields the best results. “A substantially lower risk of mortality was observed among individuals who had adequate levels of both long-term leisure time moderate and vigorous physical activity,” the study states, adding that higher levels of vigorous activity were linked to lower mortality among those with insufficient moderate exercise. However, this was not true for those already engaging in high levels of moderate activity (over 300 minutes weekly). The study concludes that “any combination of medium to high levels” of vigorous (75 to 300 minutes weekly) and moderate physical activity (150 to 600 minutes weekly) “can provide nearly the maximum mortality reduction,” around 35% to 42%.

People who are insufficiently active (less than 75 minutes of vigorous or 150 minutes of moderate exercise weekly) could achieve significant mortality reduction by incorporating modest levels of exercise. Engaging in 75 to 150 minutes of vigorous exercise or 150 to 300 minutes of moderate exercise weekly can reduce cardiovascular disease mortality by 22% to 31%.

A separate study in JAMA Oncology found that brief bouts of vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity, like fast walking or stair climbing for one to two minutes, were linked to a lower cancer risk.

Age doesn’t alter the impact of exercise. While younger people often choose vigorous activities, older adults tend to prefer moderate exercise. The study found no evidence that one type of exercise was superior for older adults. Instead, “long-term vigorous physical activity in generally healthy older adults can be an effective means of improving health.”

Despite concerns that long-term high-intensity endurance exercise could cause adverse events such as myocardial fibrosis, coronary artery calcification, atrial fibrillation, and sudden cardiac death, this study found no harmful effects of long-term vigorous activity on cardiovascular health. However, further research is necessary to confirm these findings.

To sum up, the study in Circulation underscores the significant health benefits of exceeding current physical activity recommendations, particularly through a mix of moderate and vigorous exercises. This approach maximizes the reduction in mortality risk from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and non-cardiovascular diseases.

From Yale Law School to the National Spotlight: The Remarkable Journey of JD and Usha Vance

Before JD Vance was chosen as Donald Trump’s VP candidate, Vivek Ramaswamy was a leading contender. Both Ramaswamy and Vance are strong candidates for Trump’s VP spot. Interestingly, according to The Guardian, JD Vance and his wife Usha were classmates at Yale Law School. During a debate, Vivek Ramaswamy mentioned that Usha is a family friend. Notably, one of their three children is named Vivek. JD and Usha Vance’s children are named Ewan, Vivek, and Mirabel. Usha Vance has a notable career, having served as an editor for the Yale Law Journal and managing editor of the Yale Journal of Law & Technology. She also earned a master’s in philosophy from the University of Cambridge, focusing on “the methods used for protecting printing rights in seventeenth-century England,” as per her university biography. Usha met JD Vance at Yale Law School, where they co-organized a discussion group on “social decline in white America,” a key theme in his bestselling memoir, Hillbilly Elegy. The book explores his upbringing in a poor Appalachian family and the start of his relationship with Usha, played by Freida Pinto in the 2020 Netflix adaptation. Despite seeming like an unlikely match, JD describes Usha in Hillbilly Elegy as a “Yale spirit guide” who helped him navigate campus life. “She instinctively understood the questions I didn’t even know to ask, and she always encouraged me to seek opportunities that I didn’t know existed,” he wrote. Usha told NBC News, “We were friends, and I liked that he was very diligent. He would show up at 9am appointments.”

Usha Vance’s career is marked by significant legal achievements and influential roles. She began her career as an editor for the Yale Law Journal and managing editor of the Yale Journal of Law & Technology. In 2014, the same year she married JD Vance, she clerked for Brett Kavanaugh on the DC Circuit. Kavanaugh was later nominated by Donald Trump and confirmed to the US Supreme Court. Usha also served as a law clerk for Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts during the 2017-2018 term, where Roberts wrote a crucial ruling upholding Trump’s travel ban. After her clerkships, Usha joined the 200-lawyer firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, focusing on civil litigation and appeals, representing clients like the Walt Disney Company and the Regents of the University of California. Although a registered Democrat who voted in the party’s primaries until 2014, Usha supported her husband during his 2022 Republican Senate campaign. In 2024, amid speculation about JD becoming Donald Trump’s running mate, Usha emphasized her supportive role in their family’s public life. In July 2024, Usha announced her resignation from Munger to support her family, including their three children: Ewan, Vivek, and Mirabel. Her career reflects her substantial contributions to the legal field and her adaptability to her family’s evolving political landscape.

The Vances’ partnership extends beyond personal life into their professional journeys, showcasing their individual and joint contributions to legal and political realms. JD’s memoir, Hillbilly Elegy, which discusses themes of social decline in white America and his personal journey from a troubled upbringing to academic and professional success, was instrumental in his rise to prominence. The memoir not only brought attention to his story but also highlighted Usha’s influence in his life. The Netflix adaptation of Hillbilly Elegy further cemented their story in the public eye, with Usha’s character portrayed by Freida Pinto. JD’s description of Usha as his “Yale spirit guide” illustrates the depth of their connection and her role in his success. “She instinctively understood the questions I didn’t even know to ask, and she always encouraged me to seek opportunities that I didn’t know existed,” JD wrote in his memoir. Usha’s perspective on their relationship, as she shared with NBC News, highlights their mutual respect and admiration. “We were friends, and I liked that he was very diligent. He would show up at 9am appointments,” she said.

Usha Vance’s career trajectory is marked by prestigious roles and significant accomplishments. Starting as an editor for the Yale Law Journal and managing editor of the Yale Journal of Law & Technology, she quickly established herself as a formidable legal mind. Her clerkships with Brett Kavanaugh and Chief Justice John Roberts provided her with invaluable experience and insight into the highest levels of the judicial system. Her role in Roberts’ pivotal ruling upholding Trump’s travel ban showcases her involvement in significant legal decisions. Joining Munger, Tolles & Olson allowed Usha to further hone her legal skills, representing high-profile clients and handling complex civil litigation and appeals. Her decision to support JD during his 2022 Senate campaign, despite her previous Democratic affiliations, underscores her commitment to her family’s evolving political journey. Usha’s announcement in July 2024 about resigning from Munger to focus on her family and support JD’s potential role as Trump’s running mate reflects her adaptability and dedication to her family’s public life.

JD Vance’s potential selection as Donald Trump’s VP candidate brings both him and Usha into the national spotlight. The couple’s journey from Yale Law School classmates to prominent figures in the legal and political arenas is a testament to their resilience and partnership. Usha’s legal expertise and her supportive role in JD’s political career highlight the unique dynamic of their relationship. As JD and Usha navigate the complexities of public life, their story continues to inspire and captivate audiences, reflecting the power of dedication, support, and mutual respect in achieving personal and professional success.

Usha Vance’s remarkable legal career and her role as a supportive partner in JD Vance’s political journey underscore the significant contributions she has made both individually and as part of a dynamic duo. From their days at Yale Law School to their current positions in the public eye, the Vances exemplify the intersection of personal dedication and professional excellence.

Trump Reinforces Hard-Right Agenda with Vance as VP Pick, Emphasizing Loyalty and Youth

In selecting Senator J.D. Vance from Ohio as his running mate, Donald Trump aimed to bolster his hard-right agenda. Vance, who gained national attention as the author of the best-selling book “Hillbilly Elegy,” initially criticized Trump in 2016 but fully endorsed him by 2022, securing Trump’s endorsement and winning a Senate seat.

Since then, Vance has been a staunch supporter of Trump’s base. He declared the 2020 election was “stolen,” labeled the hush money trial a “sham,” called those arrested for the Capitol attack “political prisoners,” argued that Trump should be immune from criminal prosecution, blamed the attempted assassination of Trump on the Biden campaign’s messaging, and claimed he would not have certified the election results had he been vice president on January 6. Furthermore, Vance suggested that Biden and the Democrats are intentionally poisoning middle Americans with fentanyl as revenge on GOP voters, advocated for Trump to fire all bureaucrats and replace them with MAGA loyalists, and tweeted in 2023, “my education policy is that we should stop funding institutions that teach American kids to support terrorist killers…”

By choosing Vance, Trump opted for a younger, more handsome, and articulate version of himself, thus reinforcing his own message.

Presidential candidates have traditionally chosen vice presidents based on various models, some newer than others. Historically, vice presidents were chosen to “balance” the ticket, whether geographically or ideologically. For example, John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts chose Southerner Lyndon B. Johnson, while Southern conservative Jimmy Carter picked Northern liberal Walter Mondale. Sometimes these pairings worked, but often they led to strained relationships, resulting in vice presidents being sidelined or assigned trivial duties.

When balance was the criterion, it often meant the vice president had an uneventful role. Powerful senators who became vice presidents, like Harry Truman and Lyndon Johnson, found themselves out of the loop and marginalized. Truman, for instance, was unaware of the atomic bomb project until he became president after Roosevelt’s death. Johnson, as the powerful Senate Majority Leader, faced constant belittlement from Attorney General Bobby Kennedy.

This balancing model was primarily driven by electoral necessity. Before primaries settled nominations, conventions often saw multiple candidates and ballots, leading the frontrunner to make deals with rivals, offering the vice presidency as an incentive. However, in recent decades, the balancing model has been replaced by a new approach.

The new model emerged on July 9, 1992, when Bill Clinton asked Al Gore to join his ticket. Unlike traditional pairings, there was no balance between Clinton and Gore; both were young Southern politicians from the conservative wing of the Democratic Party. Headlines at the time highlighted this break from tradition: “Gore is a smart echo of the guy who chose him” and “Clinton Picks Gore as Running Mate in Break with Tradition: Democrats: Arkansas governor rejects geographical balance in choosing the Tennessee senator. Strategists believe his moderate positions can help unite divided party.”

Clinton’s choice of Gore surprised many who expected him to pick New York Governor Mario Cuomo, a Northeasterner and liberal who would have balanced Clinton’s southern roots and New Democrat ideology. But Clinton believed reinforcing his message was more crucial than balancing the ticket. In his biography, Clinton explains:

“His [Gore’s] selection defied the conventional wisdom that the vice-presidential candidates should provide political and geographic balance: We were from neighboring states. He was even younger than I was. And he, too, was identified with the New Democrat wing of the party. I believed his selection would work precisely because it didn’t have the traditional kind of balance.”

The reinforcing model has since become popular due to its advantages in both campaigning and governing. In a polarized political climate, voters seek clear stances from candidates, and a “balanced” ticket can confuse them. If Clinton had chosen Cuomo, those attracted to his centrist approach might have questioned its authenticity with a traditional liberal on the ballot.

In government, the reinforcing model ensures the president and vice president are aligned, facilitating smoother collaboration. Historically, when vice presidents were chosen for balance, they often disagreed with the president, leading to friction. With the reinforcing model, the vice president can genuinely support the president’s agenda.

The importance and influence of the vice presidency have grown with this model, starting with Al Gore and increasing with Dick Cheney. These vice presidents likely exerted more policy influence than all their predecessors combined.

The partnership model has been the norm since Gore’s selection. Unlike the fictional Selina Meyer from “Veep,” who frequently checked if the President had called (he hadn’t), Presidents Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Trump regularly communicated with their VPs, delegated significant power, and treated vice-presidential projects as presidential priorities.

This change was driven by the nomination process itself, which has diminished the importance of balance and increased the importance of message reinforcement.

Trump’s choice of Senator Vance reflects this shift. Vance will not only reinforce Trump’s core messages but also provide a reliable presence as vice president, particularly important given Trump’s age of 78. The idea of a younger, less erratic Trump excited Republicans when Governor DeSantis entered the race, though voters quickly realized he was not a suitable replacement. Vance, however, will energize the MAGA base, support an aging president in achieving his goals, and continue the fight effectively. As the Trump-Vance ticket gains momentum, Democrats, already concerned about their own weaknesses, will likely feel increased pressure.

Surati’s “Ramaavan” Musical to Bridge Cultures with ICCR-Hosted Tour in India, Including Workshops for Underprivileged Children

Surati, a US-based performing arts group, will be hosted by the Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR), the cultural arm of the Government of India dedicated to fostering cross-cultural exchanges.

Surati’s original production, “Ramaavan,” a musical inspired by the Ramayana, is set to be performed in three Indian cities, including Bengaluru. “Ramaavan” is a dynamic production that blends Indian classical dance and music with musical theater, opera, jazz, and contemporary styles. The musical had a successful off-Broadway premiere in New York and has had several shows in Jersey City.

During their visit to India, Surati will not only perform but also conduct workshops and present excerpts from their full production. They will collaborate with local artists and start scouting for talented, underprivileged, and special needs children in India. This effort will be in partnership with local non-profit organizations that work with underprivileged and special needs individuals.

Many of these children, who come from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, will participate in the show. According to a statement from the group, their goal is to train and include these children in their artistic endeavors, preparing them for future opportunities in the arts in both India and the U.S.

Rimli Roy, Surati’s founder and artistic director, who will lead the team, expressed her excitement, saying, “We are delighted that our work has been noticed by ICCR and we now get to take Ramaavan-A Musical to India while also laying the groundwork to work with underprivileged children.”

The team will include highly accomplished musical theater actors from the US, such as Jeff Brackett, Jonathan Power, Andrew Leonforte, and Giselle Bellas, who will join this cross-cultural collaboration in India. Roy noted, “We have picked a highly talented team of multi-ethnic musical theater actors to fly with us to India and join the local talent there.”

Surati for Performing Arts, an award-winning nonprofit, aims to globalize themes rooted in Indian culture through performing arts and cultural experiences. Their mission is to convey messages of equality, inclusion, and unity in diversity through staged productions, arts-in-education programs, cultural festivals, and educational workshops.

Meet Usha Vance: The Influential Lawyer and Supportive Wife of JD Vance, Trump’s Running Mate

Former President Trump recently announced his choice of Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) as his running mate at the Republican Convention in Milwaukee, receiving enthusiastic applause and celebration. This announcement has also brought attention to JD Vance’s wife, Usha Chilukuri Vance, putting her in the spotlight.

Here are some key details about Usha Vance, the 38-year-old lawyer and San Diego native:

Daughter of Immigrants

Usha Vance is the daughter of academics Krish and Lakshmi Chilukuri, who immigrated to the United States from Andhra Pradesh, India. Her mother, a biologist, serves as a college provost at the University of California, San Diego, while her father is an engineer and lecturer at the San Diego State University College of Engineering.

Born in San Diego, Usha attended Mt. Carmel High School and later graduated from the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom as a Gates Cambridge Scholar.

Meeting JD Vance at Yale

Usha met JD Vance at Yale, where she completed both her undergraduate and law degrees. She clerked for future Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh when he was an appeals court judge in Washington, D.C., and later clerked for Chief Justice John Roberts.

She has been a trial lawyer at the Munger, Tolles & Olson law firm for several years. Recently, the firm announced her departure, stating, “Usha has informed us she has decided to leave the firm. Usha has been an excellent lawyer and colleague, and we thank her for her years of work and wish her the best in her future career.”

Support for Sen. Vance

In a rare interview on “Fox & Friends,” Usha appeared alongside her husband, expressing her support for his bid to be Trump’s running mate. Although she typically stays out of the spotlight, she cautiously answered questions ranging from their faith to potential causes she might champion as the second lady.

Regarding the scrutiny that comes with the role, she said, “I don’t know if anyone is ever ready for that kind of scrutiny.” Reflecting on their first campaign experience, she noted, “It was so different from anything we’d ever done before. But it was an adventure. I guess the way that I put it is, I’m not raring to change anything about our lives right now. But I really, you know, believe in JD, and I really love him. And so we’ll just sort of see what happens with our lives.”

Successful Marriage through Communication

In the same interview, JD Vance mentioned his wife’s support as he reengaged with his Christian faith, despite her not sharing the same religion. “I had never been baptized. You know, I was raised Christian. I’d never baptized, so I was baptized first time in 2018. She was not raised Christian [and] is actually not a Christian. But I remember when I started to reengage with my own faith. She was very supportive.”

Usha added that she was raised in a Hindu household. She discussed merging their faiths, highlighting their agreement on family life and child-rearing. They have three children: Ewan, Vivek, and Mirabel. “And so I think the answer really is we just talk a lot,” she said.

Mention in Vance’s Memoir

JD Vance mentioned Usha in his memoir, “Hillbilly Elegy,” where he documented the start of their relationship. In the movie adaptation, Freida Pinto portrayed Usha. Vance described her as his “Yale spirit guide,” writing, “She instinctively understood the questions I didn’t even know to ask and she always encouraged me to seek opportunities that I didn’t know existed.”

In a 2020 interview on Megyn Kelly’s podcast, Vance spoke about the positive influence of his wife’s advice, saying, “I’m one of those guys who really benefits from having, like, a sort of powerful female voice on his left shoulder saying, ‘Don’t do that, do do that’ — it just is important.”

69th SOBHA Filmfare Awards South 2024 Nominations Announced: Celebrating Excellence Across South Indian Cinema

The nominations for the 69th SOBHA Filmfare Awards South 2024 were unveiled on Tuesday, encompassing talents from Telugu, Tamil, Kannada, and Malayalam cinema. Among the nominees are prominent figures such as Chiranjeevi, Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, Nani, Mrunal Thakur, and others, alongside acclaimed films like “Salaar Part 1: Ceasefire,” “Ponniyin Selvan—Part 2,” “Kaathal—The Core,” and “Sapta Sagaradaache Ello—Side A and B.”

Malavika Mohanan, who revealed the awards’ trophy at an event in Bengaluru alongside Rukmini Vasanth, expressed her excitement: “I am thrilled to be part of the 69th SOBHA Filmfare Awards South 2024 with Kamar Film Factory. It’s an absolute honour to celebrate the incredible talent and hard work of our industry. I look forward to a special night, filled with magic, glamour, and well-deserved recognition.”

Rukmini Vasanth emphasized the significance of the Filmfare Awards in recognizing South Indian cinema: “Filmfare Awards not only celebrates the exceptional talent and hard work within our South Indian cinema industry but also highlights the rich and diverse stories that we bring to life on the big screen. It is an honour to stand alongside such brilliant artists and be recognized for our collective contributions to the world of cinema.”

The full list of nominations includes a diverse array of categories spanning acting, directing, and technical achievements across the four regional film industries. This annual event is anticipated not only for its recognition of outstanding performances but also for its celebration of the cultural richness and artistic diversity inherent in South Indian cinema.

Telugu

BEST FILM

BABY

BALAGAM

DASARA

HI NANNA

MISS SHETTY, MR. POLISHETTY

SAMAJAVARAGAMANA

SALAAR: PART 1- CEASEFIRE

BEST DIRECTOR

ANIL RAVIPUDI (BHAGAVANTH KESARI)

KARTHIK DANDU (VIRUPAKSHA)

PRASHANTH NEEL (SALAAR: PART 1- CEASEFIRE)

SAI RAJESH (BABY)

SHOURYUV (HI NANNA)

SRIKANTH ODELA (DASARA)

VENU YELDANDI (BALAGAM)

BEST ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE (MALE)

ANAND DEVERAKONDA (BABY)

BALAKRISHNA (BHAGAVANTH KESARI)

CHIRANJEEVI (WALTAIR VEERAYYA)

DHANUSH (SIR)

NANI (DASARA)

NANI (HI NANNA)

NAVEEN POLISHETTY (MISS SHETTY, MR. POLISHETTY)

PRAKASH RAJ (RANGA MAARTHAANDA)

BEST ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE (FEMALE)

ANUSHKA SHETTY (MISS SHETTY, MR. POLISHETTY)

KEERTHY SURESH (DASARA)

MRUNAL THAKUR (HI NANNA)

SAMANTHA (SHAAKUNTALAM)

VAISHNAVI CHAITANYA (BABY)

BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE (MALE)

BRAHMANANDAM (RANGA MAARTHAANDA)

DHEEKSHITH SHETTY (DASARA)

KOTA JAYARAM (BALGAM)

NARESH (SAMAJAVARAGAMANA)

RAVI TEJA (WALTAIR VEERAYYA)

VISHNU OI (KEEDAA COLA)

BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE (FEMALE)

RAMYA KRISHNAN (RANGA MAARTHAANDA)

ROHINI MOLLETI (WRITER PADMABHUSHAN)

RUPA LAKSHMI (BALAGAM)

SHYAMALA (VIRUPAKSHA)

SREELELA (BHAGAVANTH KESARI)

SRIYA REDDY (SALAAR: PART 1- CEASEFIRE)

SWATHI REDDY (MONTH OF MADHU)

BEST MUSIC ALBUM

BABY (VIJAY BULGANIN )

BALAGAM (BHEEMS CECIROLEO)

DASARA (SANTHOSH NARAYANAN)

HI NANNA (HESHAM ABDUL WAHAB)

KUSHI (HESHAM ABDUL WAHAB)

WALTAIR VEERAYYA (DEVI SRI PRASAD)

BEST LYRICS

ANANTHA SRIRAM (GAJJU BOMMA- HI NANNA)

ANANTHA SRIRAM (O RENDU PREMA MEGHAALILA- BABY)

KASARLA SHYAM (CHAMKEELA ANGEELES)

KASARLA SHYAM (OORU PALLETOORU- BALAGAM)

  1. RAGHU ‘RELARE RELA’ (LINGI LINGI LINGIDI- KOTABOMMALI P.S)

BEST PLAYBACK SINGER (MALE)

ANURAG KULKARNI (SAMAYAMA – HI NANNA)

HESHAM ABDUL WAHAB (KUSHI TITLE SONG- KUSHI)

PVNS ROHIT (PREMISTHUNNA- BABY)

RAM MIRIYALA (POTTI PILLA – BALAGAM)

SID SRIRAM (ARADHYA- KUSHI)

SREERAMA CHANDRA (O RENDU PREMA MEGHAALILA- BABY)

BEST PLAYBACK SINGER (FEMALE)

CHINMAYI SRIPADA (ARADHYA- KUSHI)

CHINMAYI SRIPADA (ODIYAMMA- HI PAPA)

DHEE (CHAMKEELA ANGEELESI- DASARA)

MANGLI (OORU PALLETURU – BALAGAM)

SHAKTHISREE GOPALAN (AMMAADI- HI NANNA)

SHWETA MOHAN (MASTAARU MASTAARU – SIR)

Tamil

BEST FILM

AYOTHI

CHITHHA

MAAMANNAN

PONNIYIN SELVAN PART- 2

VIDUTHALAI PART- 1

BEST DIRECTOR

MADONNE ASHWIN (MAAVEERAN)

MANI RATNAM (PONNIYIN SELVAN- PART 2)

MARI SELVARAJ (MAAMANNAN)

S U ARUN KUMAR (CHITHHA)

VETRI MAARAN (VIDUTHALAI PART- 1)

BEST ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE (MALE)

SIDDHARTH (CHITHHA)

SIVAKARTHIKEYAN (MAAVEERAN)

SOORI (VIDUTHALAI PART- 1)

VADIVELU (MAAMANNAN)

VIKRAM (PONNIYIN SELVAN- PART 2)

BEST ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE (FEMALE)

AISHWARYA RAI BACHCHAN (PONNIYIN SELVAN- PART 2)

AISHWARYA RAJESH (FARHANA)

APARNA DAS (DADA)

BHAVANI SRI (VIDUTHALAI PART- 1)

NIMISHA SAJAYAN (CHITHHA)

SHRADDHA SRINATH (IRUGAPATRU)

TRISHA (PONNIYIN SELVAN- PART 2)

BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE (MALE)

FAHADH FAASIL (MAAMANNAN)

MS BHASKAR (PARKING)

S.J.SURYAH (MARK ANTONY)

VINAYAKAN (JAILER)

YOGI BABU (MAAVEERAN)

BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE (FEMALE)

ANJALI NAIR (CHITHHA)

RAICHAL RABECCA (GOOD NIGHT)

RAMA (PARKING)

SARITHA (MAAVEERAN)

SUBHADRA (BOMMAI NAYAGI)

BEST MUSIC ALBUM

CHITHHA (DHIBU NEENAN THOMAS)

JAILER (ANIRUDH RAVICHANDER)

LEO (ANIRUDH RAVICHANDER)

PONNIYIN SELVAN- PART 2 (A. R. RAHMAN)

VAATHI (GV PRAKASH KUMAR)

VIDUTHALAI PART- 1 (ILAIYARAAJA)

BEST LYRICS

ILANGO KRISHNAN (AGA NAGA- PONNIYIN SELVAN- PART 2)

ILANGO KRISHNAN (VEERA RAJA VEERA- PONNIYIN SELVAN- PART 2)

KRITHIKA NELSON (ORU VEZHAM- NITHAM ORU VAANAM)

KU KARTHIK (NIRA- TAKKAR)

SUKA (ONNODA NADANDHAA- VIDUTHALAI PART 1)

BEST PLAYBACK SINGER (MALE)

ANIRUDH RAVICHANDER (BADASS- LEO)

ANIRUDH RAVICHANDER (HUKUM- JAILER)

HARICHARAN (CHINNANJIRU NILAVE- PONNIYIN SELVAN- PART 2)

SEAN ROLDAN (NAAN GAALI- GOOD NIGHT)

SID SRIRAM AND GAUTHAM VASUDEV MENON (NIRA- TAKKAR)

VIJAY YESUDAS (NENJAME NENJAME- MAAMANNAN)

BEST PLAYBACK SINGER (FEMALE)

K.S.CHITHRA AND HARINI (VEERA RAJA VEERA- PONNIYIN SELVAN PART 2)

KARTHIKA VAIDYANATHAN (KANGAL EDHO- CHITHHA)

SHAKTHISREE GOPALAN (AGA NAGA- PONNIYIN SELVAN- PART 2)

SHAKTHISREE GOPALAN (NENJAME NENJAME- MAAMANNAN)

SHILPA RAO (KAAVAALAA- JAILER)

Kannada

BEST MOVIE

19.20.21

DAREDEVIL MUSTHAFA

KAATERA

KOUSALYA SUPRAJA RAMA

SAPTA SAGARADAACHE ELLO

SWATHI MUTTHINA MALE HANIYE

BEST DIRECTOR

HEMANTH M RAO (SAPTA SAGARADAACHE ELLO)

MANSORE (19.20.21)

NITHIN KRISHNAMURTHY (HOSTEL HUDUGARU BEKAGIDDARE)

RAJ B. SHETTY (SWATHI MUTTHINA MALE HANIYE)

SHASHANK SOGHAL (DAREDEVIL MUSTHAFA)

THARUN SUDHIR (KAATERA)

BEST ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE (MALE)

DARSHAN (KAATERA)

NAGABHUSHANA (TAGARU PALYA)

RAJ B. SHETTY (SWATHI MUTTHINA MALE HANIYE)

RAKSHIT SHETTY (SAPTA SAGARADAACHE ELLO)

SHISHIR BAIKADY (DAREDEVIL MUSTHAFA)

SHIVARAJKUMAR (GHOST)

BEST ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE (FEMALE)

AKSHATHA PANDAVAPURA (PINKI ELLI)

AMRUTHA PREM (TAGARU PALYA)

MILANA NAGARAJ (KOUSALYA SUPRAJA RAMA)

RUKMINI VASANTH (SAPTA SAGARADAACHE ELLO)

SINDHU SRINIVASAMURTHY (AACHAR & CO.)

SIRI RAVIKUMAR (SWATHI MUTTHINA MALE HANIYE)

BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE (MALE)

NAGABHUSHANA (KOUSALYA SUPRAJA RAMA)

POORNACHANDRA (DAREDEVIL MUSTHAFA)

RAJESH NATARANGA (19.20.21)

RAMESH INDIRA (SAPTA SAGARADAACHE ELLO)

RANGAYANA RAGHU (TAGARU PALYA)

BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE (FEMALE)

GUNJALAMMA (PINKI ELLI)

  1. D. PALLAVI (19.20.21)

SHRUTHI (KAATERA)

SUDHA BELAWADI (KOUSALYA SUPRAJA RAMA)

TARA (TAGARU PALYA)

BEST MUSIC ALBUM

KAATERA (V. HARIKRISHNA)

KOUSALYA SUPRAJA RAMA (ARJUN JANYA)

SAPTA SAGARADAACHE ELLO (CHARAN RAJ)

SWATHI MUTTHINA MALE HANIYE (MIDHUN MUKUNDAN)

TAGARU PALYA (VASUKI VAIBHAV)

BEST LYRICS

  1. LAKSHMAN RAO (YAVA CHUMBAKA- CHOWKA BARA)

DAALI DHANANJAYA (SAMBANJA ANNODU DODDU KANA- TAGARU PALYA)

DHANANJAY RANJAN (NADHIYE OO NADHIYE- SAPTA SAGARADAACHE ELLO SIDE A)

JAYANTH KAIKINI (PREETHISUVE- KOUSALYA SUPRAJA RAMA)

PRUTHVI (MELLAGE- SWATHI MUTTHINA MALE HANIYE)

BEST PLAYBACK SINGER (MALE)

KAPIL KAPILAN (NADHIYE O NADHIYE- SAPTA SAGARADAACHE ELLO SIDE A)

RAVINDRA SORAGAVI (NODALAGADE DEVA- VIRATAPURA VIRAAGI)

SONU NIGAM (BOMBE BOMBE- KRANTI)

VASUKI VAIBHAV (NONDKOBYAADVE-TAGARU PALYA)

VIJAY PRAKASH (PUNYATHMA- KAATERA)

BEST PLAYBACK SINGER (FEMALE)

MADHURI SESHADRI (MELLAGE- SWATHI MUTTHINA MALE HANIYE)

MANGLI (PASANDAAGAVNE- KAATERA)

PRITHWI BHAT (PREETHISUVE- KOUSALYA SUPRAJA RAMA)

SANGEETHA KATTI (KAAYO SHIVA KAPAADO SHIVA- PENTAGON)

SRILAKSHMI BELMANNU (KADALANU KAANA HORATIRO- SAPTA SAGARADAACHE ELLO SIDE A)

Malayalam

BEST FILM

2018

IRATTA

KAATHAL-THE CORE

NANPAKAL NERATHU MAYAKKAM

NERU

PACHUVUM ATHBUTHA VILAKKUM

ROMANCHAM

BEST DIRECTOR

JEETHU JOSEPH (NERU)

JEO BABY (KAATHAL-THE CORE)

JITHU MADHAVAN (ROMANCHAM)

JUDE ANTHANY JOSEPH (2018)

KRISHAND (PURUSHA PRETHAM)

LIJO JOSE PELLISSERY (NANPAKAL NERATHU MAYAKKAM)

ROHIT MG KRISHNAN (IRATTA)

BEST ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE (MALE)

BIJU MENON (THANKAM)

JOJU GEORGE (IRATTA)

MAMMOOTTY (KAATHAL- THE CORE)

MAMMOOTTY (NANPAKAL NERATHU MAYAKKAM)

NIVIN PAULY (THURAMUKHAM)

PRASANTH ALEXANDER (PURUSHA PRETHAM)

TOVINO THOMAS (2018)

BEST ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE (FEMALE)

ANJANA JAYAPRAKASH (PACHUVUM ATHBUTHA VILAKKUM)

JYOTHIKA (KAATHAL- THE CORE)

KALYANI PRIYADARSHAN (SESHAM MIKE-IL FATHIMA)

LENA (ARTICLE 21)

MANJU WARRIER (AYISHA)

NAVYA NAIR (JANAKI JAANE)

VINCY ALOSHIOUS (REKHA)

BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE (MALE)

ARJUN ASHOKAN (ROMANCHAM)

BIJU MENON (GARUDAN)

JAGDISH (FALIMY)

JAGDISH (PURUSHA PRETHAM)

SIDDIQUE (CORONA PAPERS)

VINEETH SREENIVASAN (THANKAM)

VISHNU AGASTHYA (RDX)

BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE (FEMALE)

ANASWARA RAJAN (NERU)

ANASWARA RAJAN (PRANAYA VILASAM)

ASHWATHY (B 32 MUTHAL 44 VARE)

DARSHANA RAJENDRAN (PURUSHA PRETHAM)

MANJU PILLAI (FALIMY)

POORNIMA INDRAJITH (THURAMUKHAM)

BEST MUSIC ALBUM

AYISHA (M JAYACHANDRAN)

JAWANUM MULLAPOOVUM (4 MUSICS)

MADHURA MANOHARA MOHAM (HESHAM ABDUL WAHAB)

MEHFIL (DEEPANKURAN)

PACHUVUM ATHBUTHA VILAKKUM (JUSTIN PRABHAKARAN)

RDX (SAM C S)

SANTHOSHAM (P S JAYHARI)

BEST LYRICS

ANWAR ALI (ENNUM EN KAAVAL- KAATHAL- THE CORE)

B K HARINARAYANAN (AYISHA AYISHA- AYISHA)

B K HARINARAYANAN (MUTTATHE MULLATHAI- JAWANUM MULLAPOOVUM)

MANU MANJITH (NIN KOODE NJAN ILLAYO- PACHUVUM ATHBUTHA VILAKKUM)

MUHSIN PARARI (PUTHUTHAYORITHU- IRATTA)

VINAYAK SASIKUMAR (JANUVARIYILE THEN- SANTHOSHAM)

BEST PLAYBACK SINGER (MALE)

ARVIND VENUGOPAL (ORU NOKKIL- MADHURA MANOHARA MOHAM)

K S HARISHANKER (JANUVARIYILE THEN MAZHA- SANTHOSHAM)

KAPIL KAPILAN (NEELA NILAVE- RDX)

MADHU BALAKRISHNAN (KANCHANA KANNEZHUTHI- NJANUM PINNORU NJANUM)

SHAHABAZ AMAN (PUTHUTHAYORITHU- IRATTA)

SOORAJ SANTHOSH (MAAYUNNUVO PAKALE- JANAKI JAANE)

VIJAY YESUDAS (ONNU THOTTE- JAWANUM MULLAPPOOVUM)

BEST PLAYBACK SINGER (FEMALE)

K S CHITHRA (EE MAZHAMUKILO- JALADHARA PUMPSET SINCE 1962)

K S CHITHRA (MUTTATHE MULLA- JAWANUM MULLAPPOOVUM)

KARTHIKA VAIDYANATHAN (NEEYUM NJAANUM- PAZHANJAN PRANAYAM)

MADHUVANTHI NARAYAN (CHEMBARATHI POO- JANAKI JAANE)

NAKSHATHRA SANTHOSH (VIDAATHE VICHAARAM- PHOENIX)

NITHYA MAMMEN (MIZHIYO NIRAYE- DEAR VAAPPI)

SHREYA GHOSHAL (AYISHA AYISHA- AYISHA)

Asian American Influence Surges in 2024 Election: Trump’s VP Pick Reflects Growing Political Role

Shalabh “Shalli” Kumar felt immense pride on Monday evening as Donald Trump finally revealed his anticipated choice for his running mate in the 2024 election.

But it wasn’t just the mention of Ohio Senator JD Vance that triggered Kumar’s reaction. For the founder of the Republican Hindu Coalition and chair of the Hindu and Indian Coalition of the Republican National Committee, it was the inclusion of Vance’s wife, Usha, that resonated deeply—a 38-year-old Yale graduate and daughter of Indian immigrants.

“Hindus have come a long way,” Kumar remarked, reflecting on the community’s growth in population and political influence since his arrival in the United States in the late 1960s. “It’s about time,” he added, emphasizing that the Vances “are going to represent a new generation of Americans.”

The 2024 presidential campaign has witnessed significant participation from politicians of South Asian descent. Former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy competed in the Republican primaries, while Vice President Kamala Harris seeks reelection alongside President Joe Biden.

During the Republican National Convention’s second night, both Haley and Ramaswamy unequivocally endorsed the Trump-Vance ticket in prime-time speeches. On Wednesday night, Usha Vance will introduce her husband as Trump’s running mate, marking her inaugural step in the Trump-Vance campaign.

As Asian Americans assume a more prominent role in the 2024 presidential campaign, political activists from both major parties express hope that this increased representation will lead to greater engagement with a historically overlooked voting bloc.

Chintan Patel, executive director of Indian American Impact, hailed the “phenomenal” rise of South Asian representation in politics. “Since Impact’s inception in 2016, the number of elected officials within South Asian communities has grown from approximately 50 to over 300 nationwide, including, notably, Vice President Kamala Harris,” Patel told CNN, underscoring the pivotal role of representation in reshaping community aspirations.

Sources within the Trump campaign believe that Usha Vance has the potential to appeal to minority voters. Asian Americans constitute the fastest-growing racial or ethnic group among eligible U.S. voters, according to a recent Pew Research Center analysis, with their numbers increasing by approximately 2 million since 2020—an equivalent to Nebraska’s population.

Despite their growing electoral influence, both political parties acknowledge the need for greater efforts to connect with this critical voting bloc. Christine Chen, executive director of APIAVote, emphasized the scars left by the events of 2020, including the rise in anti-Asian hate and the challenges posed by the pandemic, which underscore the importance of political engagement and representation.

“We’re also trying to reemphasize to the campaigns and the parties that they really need to do a better job in terms of reaching out to our growing base of (the) electorate, but also doing it early,” Chen stated.

Last week, APIAVote, in collaboration with AAPI Data, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, and the AARP, released the 2024 Asian American Voter Survey, highlighting key issues driving Asian American voters. While 90% of those surveyed expressed intent to vote in the upcoming elections, half reported no contact from the Democratic Party, and 57% said the same about the Republicans—an ongoing concern for Chen.

Patel stressed that, like any voting bloc, Asian Americans seek substantive commitment to issues that matter most to them, such as the economy, education, inflation, and immigration.

Immigration holds particular significance for many South Asian Republican voters due to the backlog affecting millions of Hindu and Indian Americans awaiting green cards, Kumar noted. Progressive Indian American voters, Patel added, also voice concerns over immigration policies outlined in Project 2025—a conservative blueprint that includes proposals for mass deportations.

Chen emphasized the ongoing work required to engage Asian American voters, many of whom are first-time immigrants, in understanding their potential impact on upcoming elections.

“It’s actually for us to protect a democracy,” she stated. “Everyone needs to participate. It’s no longer a democracy if only a few participate in the election process.”

Unity and Underlying Tensions: Key Takeaways from Day 2 of the GOP Convention

Former President Trump’s 2024 rivals rejoined the fold on Tuesday, as former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis took the stage, highlighting a push for unity at the GOP convention. Despite this, unity messaging was often overshadowed by attacks from figures like Arizona Senate candidate Kari Lake and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who targeted Democrats.

Nonetheless, the event has proceeded smoothly as Trump’s GOP promotes a positive message following his near-assassination. Here are five takeaways from the second day of the convention:

  1. Republicans Strive to Overcome Divisions

Even though Trump easily secured the presidential nomination, divisions persisted within the GOP during the primaries, with some voters casting protest ballots against him. However, these conflicts have been temporarily set aside following the near-fatal shooting of Trump. Speakers emphasized unity for both the party and the nation, with prominent appearances by Trump’s top rivals, Haley and DeSantis.

Haley’s presence was significant, as she initially stated she wasn’t invited to the convention. This changed after the attempted assassination, leading her to fully endorse Trump. “I’ll start by making one thing perfectly clear,” Haley said. “Donald Trump has my strong endorsement.”

DeSantis, who had already backed Trump after exiting the race, reaffirmed his support, emphasizing his alignment with Trump. Their appearances, along with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) announcing Kentucky delegates for Trump, showcase Republicans rallying around their nominee while President Biden deals with his party’s turmoil.

“We’re not all going to agree on everything, and that’s OK,” said Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), a moderate Republican. “You have to allow for robust debate and discussion. And ultimately, though, you have to find compromise and commonality and forge a path forward, and I think that’s what [Haley] was speaking to.”

However, underlying tensions remained. In a notable moment, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) taunted former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), reflecting internal Republican animosities even as they present a united front.

  1. Unity Messaging Undermined by Attacks

Despite calls for unity across party lines following the shooting, some Republicans used their speeches to attack Democrats. Lake, running against Democratic Rep. Ruben Gallego for the Senate, blamed Democrats for various problems, including “the fake news” that obscures “disastrous Democrat policies.”

Cruz accused Democrats of prioritizing votes from undocumented immigrants over protecting children, eliciting boos from the crowd. “Today, as a result of Joe Biden’s presidency, your family is less safe,” Cruz said.

The media also faced criticism. Former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson accused the press of “abus[ing] the public trust,” which led to more boos. “They divide us,” Carson claimed. “Our government has been no better.”

These remarks were striking given the convention’s theme of uniting Americans after the violent attack and the broader call to lower political temperatures.

  1. Frequent References to Vice President Harris

Vice President Harris was frequently mentioned, reflecting discussions about possibly replacing Biden at the top of the Democratic ticket. Haley criticized Harris’s handling of the border situation while hinting at the prospect of her leading the country. “Let me remind you: Kamala had one job. One job. And that was to fix the border. Now imagine her in charge of the entire country,” Haley said, prompting boos.

This rhetoric aligns with Trump allies’ increased attacks on Harris amid talks of a potential ticket swap, which Biden has rejected. Pennsylvania Senate Republican nominee David McCormick questioned Harris’s leadership, asking, “Who’s ready to retire Joe Biden and send border czar Kamala Harris back to California?”

Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird targeted Harris on policing issues, criticizing her reform calls. “They treat police like criminals and criminals like victims,” she said, referring to Biden and Harris.

Blaming Biden and Harris for the country’s problems was a recurring theme, likely to continue in GOP messaging through November. “You are worried that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are hurting our country because they are,” said Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.), a former Democrat.

  1. Battleground Senate Candidates Appeal to the Base

Senate candidates from key battleground states addressed the convention, criticizing their Democratic opponents and appealing to the GOP base as the party aims to reclaim the Senate in November. Lake led chants of “build the wall,” blaming the Biden administration for border issues.

West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice (R) brought his bulldog “Babydog” on stage, predicting political outcomes with the popular pet. “Babydog says we’ll retain the House, the majority in the House. We’re going to flip the United States Senate. And overwhelmingly we’re going to elect Donald Trump and JD Vance in November,” Justice proclaimed.

Ohio Senate candidate Bernie Moreno (R) took a jab at rival Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown (D), suggesting it’s time for both Democrats “to go home.” Wisconsin Republican Senate candidate Eric Hovde called for national unity while blaming the media and the left for divisions.

“Instead of putting on just the blue jersey or the red jersey, we need to put on the red, white, and blue jersey and come together as Americans,” Hovde said, adding that Republicans will heal the country from divisions caused by the media and “left.”

These speeches energized the base, preparing them for competitive races in the fall.

  1. Smooth Sailing for the Event

The Republican convention, now halfway over, has proceeded without significant issues. Speakers have generally stayed on message, praising Trump’s presidency and condemning the Biden administration for the country’s problems.

While some strayed from the unity message to attack Democrats, they consistently returned to the theme of voting for Trump. This contrasts with past conventions, such as in 2016 when Cruz told delegates to “vote your conscience” instead of rallying for Trump.

This time, Cruz began his remarks by “giving thanks to God Almighty” for Trump’s survival, a sentiment echoed by many speakers. The audience’s enthusiasm remained high despite the recent shooting, showing excitement each time Trump appeared. With two more days left, Republicans appear overwhelmingly satisfied with the convention’s progress.

Climate Change Alters Earth’s Rotation, Lengthening Days and Impacting Technology, Study Finds

Human-caused climate change is having profound impacts on the planet, including altering the length of a day, according to recent research. This effect is due to polar ice melt caused by global warming, which changes Earth’s rotation speed, increasing each day’s length. This trend is expected to accelerate throughout the century as humans continue to emit planet-heating pollution, according to a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The changes in day length are minute, amounting to milliseconds each day, but they have significant implications for the high-tech, interconnected systems we depend on, such as GPS. “This is a testament to the gravity of ongoing climate change,” said Surendra Adhikari, a geophysicist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and one of the report’s authors.

The length of a day on Earth is determined by the speed of Earth’s rotation, influenced by numerous factors including processes in the planet’s fluid core, the melting of massive glaciers since the last ice age, and the current melting of polar ice due to climate change. Historically, the moon has been the primary factor, gradually lengthening the day by a few milliseconds per century by exerting a gravitational pull that causes ocean bulges, slowing Earth’s rotation.

Previous research has linked polar ice melt to longer days, but this new study indicates that global warming is a more significant factor than previously thought. “In the past, the impact of climate change on time has not been so dramatic,” said Benedikt Soja, a study author and assistant professor of space geodesy at ETH Zurich. However, he notes that this is changing, with climate change potentially becoming the dominant factor over the moon if current pollution levels persist.

As humans warm the planet, glaciers and ice sheets melt, and the resulting meltwater flows from the poles toward the equator. This redistribution of mass changes Earth’s shape, flattening it at the poles and causing it to bulge at the equator, which in turn slows its rotation. This process is akin to a spinning ice skater extending their arms to slow their spin.

The international team of scientists examined a 200-year period from 1900 to 2100, using observational data and climate models to assess how climate change has influenced day length in the past and to predict future impacts. They found that climate change’s impact on day length has significantly increased. In the 20th century, sea level rise caused by climate change altered the length of a day by 0.3 to 1 millisecond. In the past two decades, the increase has been 1.33 milliseconds per century, a rate significantly higher than any time in the previous century.

If emissions continue to rise, warming the oceans and accelerating ice loss in Greenland and Antarctica, the rate of change is expected to increase dramatically. The report predicts that if emissions are not curbed, climate change could lengthen the day by 2.62 milliseconds by the end of the century, surpassing the natural effects of the moon.

“In barely 200 years, we will have altered the Earth’s climate system so much that we are witnessing its impact on the very way Earth spins,” Adhikari told CNN. While a few extra milliseconds per day might go unnoticed by humans, it affects technology. Accurate timekeeping is crucial for GPS and other communication and navigation systems, which rely on highly precise atomic time.

Since the late 1960s, the world has used coordinated universal time (UTC) to set time zones, relying on atomic clocks but keeping pace with Earth’s rotation. This means “leap seconds” must occasionally be added or subtracted to maintain alignment with Earth’s rotation.

Some studies have suggested a link between increased day length and an uptick in earthquakes, according to Mostafa Kiani Shahvandi, a study author and geoscientist at ETH Zurich. However, this connection remains speculative, requiring much more research to establish any definitive link.

A paper on the same topic published in March found that while climate change was increasingly slowing Earth’s rotation, processes in Earth’s core could counteract this by speeding it up, thus shortening day length. “What we have done is to go a little bit further and re-estimate these trends,” said Shahvandi, noting that their study found the influence of the molten core was outweighed by that of climate change.

Duncan Agnew, a professor of geophysics at the University of California San Diego and author of the March study, stated that the new study aligns with his research, extending its results further into the future and considering more climate scenarios. Jacqueline McCleary, an assistant professor of physics at Northeastern University not involved in the study, said the research contributes to a longstanding debate about the role of climate change in altering day length.

While there is now general consensus that climate change will have a “net lengthening effect on the day,” McCleary told CNN, there has been uncertainty about which processes will dominate this century. This study concludes that climate change is now the second most dominant factor. “We have to consider that we are now influencing Earth’s orientation in space so much that we are dominating effects that have been in action for billions of years,” said Soja.

The profound impacts of human activity on the planet are increasingly evident, not only in the environment but in the fundamental mechanisms of Earth’s rotation. This research underscores the far-reaching consequences of climate change, emphasizing the urgent need to address the root causes of global warming.

A Journey Through U.S. Currency: From Continental Bills to the Elusive $100,000 Note

Tracing the evolution of a nation’s currency provides a unique window into its history. Currency’s journey is rarely straightforward, filled with complex technicalities that can challenge even the most devoted economist. Here, we explore some of the most fascinating moments in the history of U.S. currency, simplifying the tale for those without an economics degree.

The First National Bills Were Called “Continentals”

The Continental Congress issued the first national paper currency for what would become the United States of America in 1775. Named Continental currency, it aimed to fund the Revolutionary War. Initially strong, its value quickly depreciated due to inadequate revenue sources and government mismanagement. Britain’s counterfeiting of the 1777 and 1778 issues exacerbated the problem, forcing Congress to recall these printings. By 1779, as the currency’s value plummeted, Congress halted new printings of Continentals. Although the bills continued to circulate, they were worth only 1% of their face value by 1781.

New Coins Were Minted Under Alexander Hamilton

By the late 18th century, the United States required a currency overhaul. In 1791, Alexander Hamilton, the first treasury secretary, established the Bank of the United States to create a stable credit system. The following year, Congress passed the Coinage Act of 1792, establishing a national mint in Philadelphia to produce coins from copper, silver, and gold. These included the denominations we use today, along with a broader range of values. Copper coins included the half cent and cent; silver coins featured the half dime, dime, quarter, half dollar, and dollar; and gold coins included the quarter eagle ($2.50), half eagle ($5), and eagle ($10).

The U.S. Dollar Was Based on the Spanish Peso

The U.S. dollar originated as a coin based on the Spanish milled dollar, known as the peso, replicating its weight and silver value. The origin of the dollar sign remains unclear. One theory suggests it evolved from superimposing the “S” and “P” from the old shorthand for peso (“ps”), later simplified into the dollar sign. Another theory proposes that it derived from a superimposed “U” and “S,” potentially representing “units of silver.” However, no substantive evidence supports these theories. Despite its iconic status, the exact origin of the dollar sign remains a mystery.

George Washington Wasn’t on the First Dollar Bill

The first U.S. $1 note, part of the legal tender known as “greenbacks” for their color, was printed in 1862. This initial dollar bill did not feature George Washington but instead displayed the likeness of then-Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase. Chase, in charge of creating the currency, placed his own image on it. During a speech, he recounted, “I went to work and made ‘greenbacks’ and a good many of them. I had some handsome pictures put on them; and as I like to be among the people… and as the engravers thought me rather good looking, I told them they might put me on the end of the one-dollar bills.”

Greenbacks included anti-counterfeiting measures such as the U.S. Treasury seal, engraved signatures, and complex geometric patterns. These early measures are the roots of techniques still in use today, augmented by additional identifying factors. George Washington replaced Chase on the dollar bill permanently in 1869, with Section 116 of the annual Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act preventing any redesign of the $1 note.

There Used To Be a $10,000 Bill

While the $100 bill is currently the largest denomination of American currency, much larger notes were once printed. Until their discontinuation in 1969, notes in $500, $1,000, $5,000, and $10,000 denominations existed, though they were not widely circulated. The $500 note featured John Marshall on the blue seal version and President William McKinley on the green seal version. The blue seal $1,000 depicted Alexander Hamilton, while its green seal counterpart featured Grover Cleveland. James Madison appeared on the $5,000 note. The $10,000 note, the highest value of American currency ever circulated, featured Salmon P. Chase on both versions.

Only one piece of U.S. currency surpasses the $10,000 note: the $100,000 gold certificate, which was never circulated. Printed for just three weeks between 1934 and 1935, this gold certificate was intended exclusively for transactions between Federal Reserve Banks. Woodrow Wilson was portrayed on the front of the note. Possession of the $100,000 gold certificate by a civilian is illegal, making it one of the strangest possible financial crimes.

The history of U.S. currency is a fascinating journey through economic challenges, innovation, and the occasional act of vanity. From the initial Continental currency to the high-value notes of the 20th century, each development reflects the evolving needs and values of the nation. As we continue to use the dollar today, these historical moments remind us of the intricate and often surprising path that has shaped the currency we now take for granted.

Usha Chilukuri Vance: The Influential Partner Behind J.D. Vance’s Rise to Vice Presidential Nominee

J.D. Vance has the unwavering support of his wife, Usha Chilukuri Vance, as he steps into the role of Donald Trump’s vice presidential candidate for the 2024 election.

The Ohio senator was accompanied by his wife at the Republican National Convention on July 15, where they were seen holding hands while greeting onlookers. This event marked Vance’s first public appearance with his running mate. The couple, who first met at Yale Law School in the 2010s, organized a discussion group on “social decline in white America,” as reported by The New York Times.

Vance and Usha quickly bonded, with Vance describing her as his “Yale spirit guide.” They married in 2014, a year after graduating from Yale Law School. Since then, they have welcomed three children together. Although they keep their family life private, the couple frequently steps out for political events. Usha was notably by Vance’s side during his 2022 campaign for Ohio’s Senate seat, where he won the Republican nomination after being endorsed by former President Donald Trump and defeated Democratic nominee Tim Ryan in the general election.

Beyond her support for Vance’s political career, Usha has an impressive background herself. Here’s everything to know about J. D. Vance’s wife, Usha Chilukuri Vance.

They Met in Law School

The couple met in 2013 at Yale Law School, where they collaborated on a discussion group focused on “social decline in white America.” According to The New York Times, the group’s reading materials included scholarly papers like “Urban Appalachian Children: An ‘Invisible’ Minority in City Schools.” The syllabus reportedly influenced Vance’s 2016 memoir, *Hillbilly Elegy*, which explores his experiences growing up in the postindustrial Rust Belt.

While at Yale, Usha held prominent positions such as executive development editor of the Yale Law Journal and managing editor of the Yale Journal of Law & Technology. She was also involved in the Supreme Court Advocacy Clinic, the Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic, and the Iraqi Refugee Assistance Project. Usha earned her BA in history from Yale University and her MPhil in early modern history from the University of Cambridge as a Gates Cambridge Scholar.

They Got Married in 2014

In 2014, a year after graduating from Yale Law School, Vance and Usha married.

They Have Three Kids

The couple has three children: two sons, Ewan and Vivek, and a daughter named Mirabel. Vance announced Mirabel’s birth on Instagram on December 21, 2021, writing, “We were blessed with an early Christmas present this year. Everyone please meet Mirabel Rose Vance, our first girl. Mama and baby both doing great, and we’re feeling very grateful this Christmas season.” Vance generally keeps his children out of the spotlight but occasionally references them, such as when he read Dr. Seuss’ *Oh, the Places You’ll Go!* on the Senate floor in honor of his son Vivek’s 4th birthday in February 2024. He said, “I’m sorry that they could I can’t be with you for your birthday dinner. But I want you to know that Daddy loves you very much. And I’m going to read this into the record because maybe you can watch it at home.”

She Grew Up in San Diego

Born in California, Usha is “the child of Indian immigrants” and grew up in the suburbs of San Diego, as reported by The New York Times. She attended Mt. Carmel High School in Rancho Peñasquitos.

She Worked as a Litigator

Usha’s career as a litigator included positions in the San Francisco and Washington, D.C. offices of Munger, Tolles & Olson from 2015 to 2017. She then clerked for Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. of the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as for Judge Brett Kavanaugh and Judge Amul Thapar, until 2018. Usha returned to Munger, Tolles & Olson in January 2019, focusing on complex civil litigation and appeals in various sectors such as higher education, local government, entertainment, and technology.

Following Vance’s vice-presidential nomination, Usha’s profile was removed from the firm’s website. The firm stated, “Usha has been an excellent lawyer and colleague, and we thank her for her years of work and wish her the best in her future career.” Usha also issued a statement, saying, “In light of today’s news, I have resigned from my position at Munger, Tolles & Olson to focus on caring for our family. I am forever grateful for the opportunities I’ve had at Munger and for the excellent colleagues and friends I’ve worked with over the years.”

J.D. Credits Her for Guiding Him in His Early Career

Vance often praises Usha for her support. In a November 2022 interview with The New York Times, he referred to her as his “Yale spirit guide” and noted, “She instinctively understood the questions I didn’t even know to ask and she always encouraged me to seek opportunities that I didn’t know existed.” In a 2020 interview with Megyn Kelly on her podcast, *The Megyn Kelly Show*, Vance said, “I’m one of those guys who really benefits from having sort of a powerful female voice over his left shoulder saying, ‘Don’t do that, do that.’”

She Was by His Side at the Republican National Convention

Shortly after Vance was announced as Trump’s vice-presidential pick, he and Usha appeared at the Republican National Convention on July 15 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. They were seen holding hands and smiling at each other, with Vance soaking in the applause from the crowd.

Trump Selects Senator JD Vance as Vice Presidential Running Mate Amid Controversy and Criticism

Donald Trump has chosen Senator JD Vance of Ohio as his vice presidential running mate, putting an end to speculation over who would join him in challenging President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump made the announcement on Monday via his Truth Social post, stating, “After careful consideration and recognizing the talents of many others, I have decided that Senator J.D. Vance of Ohio is best suited for the role of Vice President of the United States.”

Later that day, during the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Vance was formally confirmed as Trump’s running mate. This decision came shortly after Trump himself was confirmed as the GOP’s presidential nominee earlier in the proceedings.

Vance’s selection marks a significant elevation for the 39-year-old senator, who entered politics less than two years ago as a relative newcomer. It also symbolizes Vance’s shift towards aligning with Trump’s political ideology, a contrast to his earlier criticisms of the former president.

Vance gained national recognition with his bestselling memoir “Hillbilly Elegy” in 2016, which reflected on his upbringing in rural Ohio and provided insights into the culture and politics of Appalachia. Despite initial skepticism, the book established Vance as a sharp political commentator, particularly attuned to the perspectives of the White working class.

Prior to his Senate tenure, Vance worked in the private sector, notably with Mithril Capital and as the founder of his own venture capital firm, Narya, starting in 2019. His entry into the Senate came after a successful campaign in 2022, where he secured victory over Democrat Tim Ryan.

In an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity, Vance recounted Trump’s call inviting him to join the ticket, quoting Trump as saying, “I believe you are the best person to assist me in governing and winning, especially in states like Pennsylvania and Michigan.” This decision excluded other prominent contenders like Senator Marco Rubio and North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, according to NBC News.

The Biden campaign swiftly criticized Vance’s selection, alleging that Vance’s alignment with Trump’s agenda would harm the nation. Campaign chair Jen O’Malley Dillon asserted, “Vance will support Trump’s extreme MAGA agenda, even at the cost of breaking laws and harming American citizens.”

In response to Harris’s acceptance of a vice presidential debate invitation, Vance received congratulations from Harris herself via a message, NBC sources confirmed. Shortly after Vance’s selection was made public, his wife Usha Vance resigned from her position at the law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson.

Before entering politics, Vance had been a vocal critic of Trump, famously describing him as a “total fraud” and likening his political movement to a harmful drug in writings for The Atlantic prior to Trump’s 2016 election victory. However, Vance’s views evolved significantly during his time in politics, leading him to become one of Trump’s staunchest supporters.

In recent months, Vance has actively embraced his pro-Trump stance, attending rallies and defending Trump vigorously, particularly during Trump’s legal battles. Vance attributed Trump’s survival of an assassination attempt at a Pennsylvania rally to rhetoric from the Biden campaign, a claim that drew widespread criticism and calls for political restraint.

As a senator, Vance has taken controversial stances, including opposing U.S. aid to Ukraine amidst its conflict with Russia and voting consistently against legislation aimed at expanding federal abortion rights. His announcement as Trump’s running mate added further drama to a day already marked by significant Trump-related developments.

Earlier on the same day, a federal judge dismissed a criminal case against Trump, alleging illegal retention of classified documents and obstruction of government efforts to retrieve them.

History of Presidential Peril: From Lincoln to Trump, a Chronicle of Assassination Attempts and Attacks on American Leaders

Former President Donald Trump was seen falling to the ground on Saturday, clutching his face amidst what appeared to be gunfire during a rally in Pennsylvania.

“Blood could be seen on his face as he was carried away by Secret Service,” reported eyewitnesses.

The incident sparked immediate concern and a flurry of live updates on the breaking news.

According to a CNN report from 2011 and a compilation by CNN’s research library detailing instances of political violence, multiple presidents, former presidents, and candidates for president have historically been targets of attacks in American history.

“In the pre-Civil War era, President Andrew Jackson faced an attempted assassination when he was shot at during a funeral in the Capitol,” the report noted, underscoring the enduring risks faced by leaders in the United States.

Similarly, former President Theodore Roosevelt, during his 1912 campaign bid to reclaim the presidency, was shot while en route to a speech in Milwaukee. Reflecting on the incident later, Roosevelt remarked that the bullet was slowed by a folded-up copy of his 50-page speech, which remained lodged in his body for the rest of his life. Despite the attempt on his life, he proceeded to deliver his speech as planned.

The historical thread continues with Franklin D. Roosevelt, who, as president-elect, narrowly escaped an assassin’s bullet in Miami in 1933. Although Roosevelt was unharmed, the assailant, Guiseppe Zangara, fatally wounded Chicago Mayor Anton Cermak and was subsequently executed by electrocution.

In 1950, Harry Truman, who assumed the presidency following Roosevelt’s death, was targeted by Puerto Rican nationalists who fired shots at the White House.

Alabama Governor George Wallace, known for his segregationist stance and multiple presidential campaigns, was left paralyzed from the waist down after being shot outside Washington, DC, during a campaign event in 1972. Wallace later underwent a political reevaluation influenced by his personal ordeal.

Gerald Ford, during his presidency in 1975, faced two assassination attempts in rapid succession. The first, by Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme, a follower of Charles Manson, was thwarted before she could fire at Ford in Sacramento, California. Shortly thereafter, Sara Jane Moore attempted to shoot Ford in San Francisco but missed due to the intervention of a bystander.

Ronald Reagan, in 1981, was shot outside the Hilton Hotel in Washington, DC, immediately after delivering a speech. The attack also severely injured Reagan’s press secretary, James Brady, who later became a prominent advocate for gun control. The assailant, John Hinckley, spent years in a mental institution before being released from court supervision in 2022.

“All presidents and former presidents receive lifetime Secret Service protection due to ongoing threats,” emphasized security measures.

The list of assassination attempts and plots against presidents extends to recent decades. In 2011, an Idaho man was charged with attempting to assassinate President Barack Obama by firing shots at the White House. Similarly, a man was charged with attempting to assassinate then-President Bill Clinton in 1994 after shooting at the White House. A foiled plot in 1993 targeted former President George H.W. Bush in Kuwait, and in 2005, his son, then-President George W. Bush, narrowly escaped an assassination attempt involving a grenade during a visit to Georgia.

Reflecting on history, four U.S. presidents have tragically lost their lives to assassination. Abraham Lincoln, the first president to be assassinated, was shot in 1865 at Ford’s Theater in Washington, DC, by John Wilkes Booth, an actor and Southern sympathizer. Booth evaded capture initially but was later apprehended and killed.

President James Garfield, in July 1881, was shot at a train station in Washington, DC, by Charles Guiteau, a disgruntled former supporter suffering from mental illness. Garfield succumbed to his injuries months later.

William McKinley, in September 1901, fell victim to an anarchist’s bullet at the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, New York. Despite efforts to save him, McKinley passed away from his wounds.

John F. Kennedy, in a moment etched in national memory, was assassinated in November 1963 in Dallas by sniper Lee Harvey Oswald. Oswald, captured shortly after the shooting, was later killed by Jack Ruby.

Robert F. Kennedy, JFK’s brother and a senator from New York running for president in 1968, was tragically shot at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles on the night of his California Democratic primary victory. His assailant, Sirhan Sirhan, remains incarcerated in California, his recent parole request having been denied.

Amidst these harrowing incidents, the resilience of American leadership and the ongoing security challenges they face underscore the gravity of protecting those who hold the nation’s highest office.

Global Leaders Condemn Shooting at Trump Rally, Call for End to Political Violence

On July 13, global leaders united in condemnation following the shooting at Donald Trump’s rally in Pennsylvania, where the former president sustained a gunshot wound to his right ear, resulting in the deaths of one rally attendee and the shooter.

Leaders from around the world expressed shock at the incident, denounced political violence, and extended wishes for Trump’s swift recovery.

A spokesperson for United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres denounced the shooting, labeling it as “an act of political violence.”

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, emphasizing his friendship with Trump, conveyed his wishes for a speedy recovery while strongly condemning the incident: “Violence has no place in politics and democracies.”

Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida underscored the importance of standing firm against any violence that challenges democracy: “We must stand firm against any form of violence that challenges democracy.”

According to the Secret Service, two other spectators were injured during the rally, while the FBI launched an investigation into what they deemed an assassination attempt.

Trump, 78, took to social media to announce that he had been shot in the upper part of his right ear and was experiencing significant bleeding. His campaign assured the public that he was recovering well, and he was discharged from the hospital later on July 13.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer expressed his dismay at the rally’s violent turn: “I was appalled by the shocking scenes at the rally. Political violence in any form has no place in our societies, and my thoughts are with all the victims of this attack.”

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the shooting as “concerning and confronting,” echoing the sentiments of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who stated that he was “sickened” by the incident and emphasized that “political violence is never acceptable.” Similar sentiments were echoed by leaders from Thailand, Taiwan, New Zealand, and the Philippines.

A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll revealed growing concerns among Americans about political violence, with two-thirds of respondents fearing potential violence following the upcoming November elections, where Trump, representing the Republican Party, will compete against President Joe Biden, a Democrat who also condemned the shooting.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu expressed his shock over the shooting, while Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who had recently met with Trump during a NATO summit in the U.S., offered his prayers and support: “My prayers are with the former president in these dark hours.”

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva denounced the shooting as unacceptable and urged others to join in condemning it: “The attack against former President Donald Trump must be vehemently repudiated by all defenders of democracy and dialogue in politics. What we saw today is unacceptable.”

Spain Ends England’s Euro Heartbreak with Oyarzabal’s Late Winner in Historic Final

Spain shattered England’s hopes of ending their 58-year trophy drought as Mikel Oyarzabal netted a late goal to secure a 2-1 victory in the Euro 2024 final in Berlin. Nico Williams and Cole Palmer exchanged goals in the second half before Oyarzabal’s decisive strike in the 86th minute clinched Spain’s historic fourth European Championship title.

“It’s the best feeling to score the winning goal,” Oyarzabal expressed to reporters, AFP reported. “I did my job and I’m fortunate it led to this victory.”

England, now enduring consecutive Euro final losses, previously fell to Italy in the Euro 2020 final. “Losing in a final is incredibly tough,” remarked England captain Harry Kane. “We did well to equalize, but couldn’t capitalize on our momentum.”

Despite losing key midfielder Rodri to injury at halftime, Spain remained resilient. They took the lead early in the second half through Lamine Yamal’s assist to Williams, who found the net past Jordan Pickford. Meanwhile, England substituted Kane for Ollie Watkins, who later helped Palmer equalize.

The match seemed destined for extra time until Oyarzabal, subbed on for Alvaro Morata, converted Marc Cucurella’s cross in the 86th minute. Spain defended their lead with Dani Olmo’s crucial clearance from Marc Guehi’s header in stoppage time.

Post-match, Rodri was honored as the Player of the Tournament, and Yamal received the Best Young Player award on his 17th birthday. Gareth Southgate, whose contract expires soon, declined to discuss his future plans, stating, “Now isn’t the time for decisions.”

Spain’s victory marked their first European title since 2012, capping a tournament where they were hailed as the top-performing team, culminating in an unbeaten record and a new championship record of 15 goals scored.

 

Spain Claims Euro 2024 Glory with Late Oyarzabal Strike, England’s Trophy Drought Continues

Spain dashed England’s hopes of ending a 58-year trophy drought when Mikel Oyarzabal scored late to secure a 2-1 victory in the Euro 2024 final in Berlin on Sunday.

Nico Williams and Cole Palmer exchanged goals in the second half before Oyarzabal’s decisive strike in the 86th minute clinched Spain’s historic fourth European Championship title. This victory marked Spain’s first continental triumph since 2012, contrasting sharply with England’s ongoing quest for another major men’s trophy.

The final was a fitting conclusion to Spain’s dominant campaign in Euro 2024, where they maintained a flawless record, triumphing over formidable opponents such as Croatia, Italy, Germany, and France en route to the title. Spain also set a new record for the most goals scored by a team in a single European Championship, netting a total of 15 goals throughout the tournament.

Reflecting on his winning goal, Oyarzabal expressed gratitude and highlighted the significance of his crucial contribution: “I did my job, what I had to do at every moment. I was lucky enough to score the winner. You value it a lot. And if you’re lucky enough to score the goal … it’s the best,” he told reporters.

England, meanwhile, suffered a heartbreaking loss, becoming the first team in history to lose consecutive Euro finals. Gareth Southgate’s team had previously been defeated by Italy in the Euro 2020 final on penalties at Wembley Stadium.

Captain Harry Kane lamented the team’s inability to capitalize on their equalizer: “Losing in a final is as tough as it gets. We did really well to get back in the game at 1-1, and then we couldn’t use our momentum to push on. … It’s as painful as it can be in a football match.”

Spain started the game strongly, asserting control with possession and creating several scoring opportunities in the initial 20 minutes. Both teams had chances to break the deadlock as the first half progressed, but remained cautious, avoiding unnecessary risks.

Despite losing midfield linchpin Rodri to injury at halftime, Spain responded swiftly after the break. Lamine Yamal combined effectively with Nico Williams, who capitalized on a Yamal pass to open the scoring in the 47th minute, eluding Luke Shaw’s defense and beating Jordan Pickford with a precise shot into the far corner.

In a parallel substitution, England replaced Kane with Ollie Watkins, who made an immediate impact. Cole Palmer restored parity for England, calmly slotting home a goal less than 20 minutes before full time after coming on as a substitute.

With the match poised for extra time, Oyarzabal, substituting captain Alvaro Morata, seized the moment in the 86th minute. He redirected Marc Cucurella’s low cross into the net from close range, securing Spain’s victory and denying England another chance to equalize.

England mounted a desperate late effort to force extra time, but Dani Olmo’s goal-line clearance thwarted Marc Guehi’s header in the 90th minute, preserving Spain’s lead.

Post-match accolades saw Rodri crowned as the Player of the Tournament, while Lamine Yamal, celebrating his 17th birthday, received the Best Young Player award.

Regarding his future as England manager, Gareth Southgate remained non-committal: “I don’t think now is a good time to make a decision like that. I’m going to talk to the right people and, yeah, it’s just not for now,” he stated.

Social Security Payment Schedule and Benefits: July 2024 Updates and COLA Expectations

Millions of retirees under the Social Security system are slated to receive their monthly payments directly into their bank accounts by July 10th.

Social Security serves as a cornerstone of retirement planning for over 60 million Americans. However, due to the large number of recipients, payments are staggered across different dates depending on recipients’ birth dates.

According to the Social Security Administration, beneficiaries whose birthdays fall between the 1st and 10th of any month will receive their payments this Wednesday.

“In addition to today’s payments, two more rounds are scheduled for July,” said an official. Those born from the 11th to the 20th can expect payments on July 17, while those born from the 21st to the 31st will receive payments on July 24.

Exceptions to these dates include those who have been receiving benefits since May 1997 or who receive both retirement benefits and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). These groups received their payments on July 3 and July 1 respectively.

“If you receive benefits based on someone else’s work record, such as survivor or spousal benefits, your payment date is tied to the primary beneficiary’s birthday,” the official clarified.

The SSA advises waiting three working days before contacting them if your payment is delayed beyond the expected date, excluding weekends and public holidays.

The amount of retirement benefit you receive depends on several factors, including the age at which you start claiming benefits and your earnings during your highest-paid years of work.

For those who retired at 70, the maximum benefit of $4,873 is available in 2024, contingent upon their earnings during their peak working years. Those who opt to start claiming benefits at 62, the earliest possible age, can receive a maximum benefit of $2,710.

“In January, the average individual received $1,907,” the official stated. This amount is expected to increase in 2025 due to the Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA).

COLA adjusts benefits annually based on inflation, specifically tied to the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers. The increase beneficiaries can expect in the coming year hinges on the index’s third-quarter figures for July, August, and September of this year.

Unveiling the Timeless Craft: Exploring the Legacy and Artistry of Kanjeevaram Saris

If you were enchanted by Athiya Shetty’s wedding saree or captivated by Rekha’s exquisite trousseau, you’re not alone. The mention of a sari often evokes thoughts of the luxurious Kanjeevaram silk sari, renowned for its elegance and luminosity.

Binal Patel, founder of Binal Patel brand, emphasizes that wearing a Kanjeevaram sari at weddings signifies a deep connection to cultural heritage. She highlights the appeal of lighter Kanjeevarams, particularly suitable for summer weddings, catering to modern women who prioritize comfort alongside elegance. “Lighter Kanjeevarams are not only luxurious but also handcrafted, possessing heirloom quality at accessible price points,” Patel remarked.

John Varghese, professor at the School of Fashion, World University of Design, observes a cultural shift among youth embracing Indian traditions in innovative ways. “Kanjeevaram saris and silk fabrics creatively transformed into garments are increasingly visible at corporate events, ceremonies, and festive occasions,” Varghese noted.

In the third installment of our ongoing series on Indian textiles, we delve into the rich legacy of Kanjeevaram saris. Explore the origins of this traditional fabric, its production process, authenticity markers, and its growing popularity among today’s youth.

Tracing the Origins of Kanjeevaram Saris

“The Kanjeevaram sari derives its name and origins from Kanchipuram, a temple town in Tamil Nadu renowned for silk weaving,” explained Patel. “Legend has it that the weavers of Kanchipuram, descendants of Sage Markanda—the divine master weaver—crafted these exquisite saris from delicate lotus fibers.”

Originally nine yards in length, Kanjeevaram saris evolved over time into the iconic six-yard versions. The art of Kanjeevaram sari weaving spans 400 years and remains rooted in tradition, predominantly practiced within temple precincts by dedicated artisans, elaborated Varghese.

“In South Indian weddings, Kanjeevaram silk saris hold a position of reverence, symbolizing purity, elegance, and prosperity,” stated Varghese. These silk saris also adorn Bharatanatyam dancers, enhancing the grace and grandeur of their performances through vibrant colors and rich textures.

The Art of Kanjeevaram Sari Making

Patel detailed the meticulous process involved in crafting these saris:

– Silk Selection:The process commences with selecting premium mulberry silk, traditionally sourced from farms in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, prized for its durability and lustrous texture.

– Dyeing:Raw silk threads undergo multiple soakings, boilings, and washings to achieve vibrant, enduring colors using natural dyes.

– Spinning:Dyed silk threads are spun to enhance their strength and sheen, varying in thickness before being wound onto bobbins for weaving.

– Weaving:This intricate process, taking days or weeks, is executed on handlooms by skilled artisans. Warp and weft threads are interlaced to create borders and the sari body, often using the “korvai” technique. Designs inspired by temple architecture and nature are woven using zari (gold or silver thread).

– Finishing:The completed sari undergoes trimming, washing, and ironing to achieve a crisp finish, softening the fabric.

Distinctive Characteristics of Kanjeevaram Saris

“The distinctiveness of Kanjeevaram saris lies in weaving the border, body, and pallu simultaneously on the loom,” explained Varghese. This method ensures three solid and vibrant color areas—body, border, and pallu—using techniques like Korvai and Petni.

– Korvai Technique:Borders and the body are interwoven using three shuttles simultaneously, creating a seamless integration of colors and motifs.

– Petni Technique:Involves manually joining contrasting colored new warp yarns to existing warp threads, enhancing the pallu’s distinctiveness.

– Supplementary Weft Techniques:Patterns are further enriched using metallic yarns through brocading or jacquard methods, adding intricate detailing.

Varieties of Kanjeevaram Saris

Classic:Woven using traditional techniques, these heavy-weight saris with rich drapes are ideal for formal occasions.

Korvai: Known for their visual impact, these saris feature distinct body and pallu sections woven separately and joined seamlessly.

Thread Brocade:Characterized by raised patterns and intricate motifs created with additional weft threads, often depicting mythological scenes or floral designs.

Pattupettu:Featuring simpler, geometric patterns like checks, stripes, or temple borders, these lighter saris are suitable for everyday wear.

Zari Brocade:Incorporating pure gold or silver zari work into the body or borders, these saris exude opulence with a shimmering effect.

Checked:These saris boast a chequered pattern on the body, offering a modern twist to traditional designs.

Without Border:Deviating from wide borders, these saris focus on intricate body designs for a unique look.

Identifying Authentic Kanjeevaram Saris

Varghese and Patel stressed the importance of examining borders and body integration to verify the authenticity of Kanjeevaram silk saris. “Genuine saris feature traditional motifs inspired by South Indian culture, mythology, or nature,” Patel highlighted. Factors such as weight, zari work, and silk quality further aid in distinguishing authentic handloom Kanjeevaram saris from their powerloom counterparts.

Supporting the Kanjeevaram Industry

Despite challenges like the rise of powerloom weaves due to cost concerns, Patel emphasized the enduring appeal of Kanjeevaram saris across generations. “Educating consumers to differentiate between handloom and powerloom saris and opting for those with Geographical Indication (GI) tags can support artisans directly,” she suggested. Supporting initiatives that ensure fair wages and social security for weavers can incentivize the preservation of this traditional craft.

Biden Orders Security Review After Trump Survives Assassination Attempt at Rally

President Joe Biden has initiated an independent assessment of the security protocols employed during Saturday’s campaign rally, where Donald Trump narrowly escaped an attempted assassination.

Addressing the nation on Sunday, Biden reiterated his condemnation of the violence and urged Americans to allow the FBI’s investigation to proceed unhindered.

According to reports, Trump claimed to have been shot in the ear and was swiftly escorted to safety Saturday evening, his face stained with blood. The assailant and a member of the audience perished in the altercation, while two other attendees suffered severe injuries, as confirmed by the Secret Service.

The FBI has identified the shooter as Thomas Matthew Crooks, a 20-year-old resident of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania. Law enforcement authorities assert that Crooks discharged multiple rounds from a rooftop adjacent to the rally site before being neutralized by Secret Service personnel.

In light of the incident, the Secret Service now faces intense scrutiny, with demands mounting for congressional investigations into the security measures in place during the rally.

Nvidia Surpasses $3 Trillion Market Cap, Prepares for 10-for-1 Stock Split Amidst Record Demand for A.I. Chips

Nvidia (NVDA), the dominant force in the A.I. chip market, achieved a significant milestone on June 6 when its market capitalization soared past $3 trillion for the first time, overtaking Apple (AAPL) to become the world’s second most valuable publicly traded company, just behind Microsoft (MSFT). This development coincided with Nvidia’s impending 10-for-1 stock split scheduled for June 7, aimed at reducing the per-share price by 90% to enhance accessibility to its stock.

According to Nvidia, this stock split won’t alter its market capitalization or core business metrics but is anticipated to spur short-term gains in its stock price. As described, “After the split, one $1,200 Nvidia share will become ten $120 shares.”

Nvidia’s remarkable ascent, under the leadership of Jensen Huang, has been driven by its H100 graphics processing units (GPUs), which form the backbone of advanced A.I. models. In the first quarter alone, Nvidia reported an astounding 628% rise in profit and a 268% increase in revenue year-over-year, underscoring its meteoric growth trajectory.

Major tech giants like Microsoft and Meta have emerged as pivotal customers for Nvidia’s H100 chips. Analysts at DA Davidson revealed that Microsoft and Meta collectively spent $9 billion on these accelerators in 2023, with both companies acquiring an estimated 150,000 chips each. Looking ahead, Microsoft aims to accumulate approximately 1.8 million GPUs by the end of 2024, largely sourced from Nvidia. Similarly, Meta announced plans earlier this year to purchase 350,000 H100 GPUs from Nvidia, supporting its ambitious A.I. projects like the Llama 3 language model, which reportedly utilized a cluster of 24,000 H100 GPUs.

Google and Amazon are also significant clients, each procuring about 50,000 Nvidia chips last year. Combined with Microsoft and Meta, these tech giants contribute nearly 40% of Nvidia’s revenue, according to Bloomberg. Amazon recently outlined its strategy to enhance its AWS cloud service as the premier platform for Nvidia GPUs, facilitating advanced generative A.I. capabilities.

Beyond the tech behemoths, Nvidia’s business extends to various cloud service providers and Chinese tech giants like Tencent, Baidu, Alibaba (BABA), and ByteDance (the parent company of TikTok). Tesla (TSLA) is another prominent customer, reportedly purchasing 15,000 A.I. chips from Nvidia in 2023. Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk disclosed plans to ramp up their usage significantly, aiming to expand the active deployment of H100s from 35,000 to 85,000 by year-end. Notably, logistical issues prompted Musk to divert 12,000 chips originally slated for Tesla to his social media venture X (formerly Twitter).

In March, Nvidia introduced its next-generation A.I. chip, Blackwell, slated for release later this year. During Nvidia’s earnings call, it was revealed that major players like Microsoft, Meta, Google, Amazon, Oracle, Tesla, xAI, and OpenAI are lined up as early adopters of this cutting-edge technology. Looking ahead, Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang unveiled plans for subsequent innovations, including the Blackwell Ultra in 2025 and a new A.I. chip platform named Rubin scheduled for 2026, underscoring Nvidia’s commitment to annual upgrades of its A.I. accelerators.

Anant Ambani and Radhika Merchant Tie the Knot in Extravagant Mumbai Wedding, Drawing Global Celebrities and Showcasing Cultural Splendor

After months of elaborate pre-wedding festivities, Anant Ambani, son of India’s wealthiest individual, concluded his highly anticipated marriage to pharmaceutical heiress Radhika Merchant in a grand ceremony in Mumbai. The event drew a star-studded guest list that included global celebrities like Kim and Khloé Kardashian, Nick Jonas, Priyanka Chopra, and former UK prime ministers Tony Blair and Boris Johnson, alongside prominent figures from Indian entertainment, sports, business, and politics.

The Ambani family, known for their leadership of Reliance Industries, spared no expense for the occasion. The wedding took place at the Ambani-owned Jio World Convention Center, where roads were closed for a red-carpet arrival amidst Mumbai’s rain. Guests arrived dressed in elaborate traditional attire, setting potential trends in Indian wedding fashion. International attendees also adhered to the dress code, showcasing designs by renowned Indian fashion houses.

Inside the venue, transformed to resemble Varanasi, celebrities such as Priyanka Chopra and John Cena were seen enjoying themselves, with videos circulating widely on social media showing the Ambani family joining Indian singer Daler Mehndi on stage. Anant arrived in a golden sherwani, later changing for the ceremony, while Radhika stunned in a meticulously crafted ensemble by Abu Jani Sandeep Khosla, adhering to Gujarati traditions with her attire changes throughout the event.

Nita Ambani, Anant’s mother, spoke of her inspiration drawn from Varanasi for the wedding’s theme, emphasizing its cultural and artisanal richness. Her own attire, a peach silk ghagra designed by Abu Jani Sandeep Khosla, symbolized the extensive craftsmanship involved in the wedding’s preparations.

The event, managed by renowned fashion designer Manish Malhotra, remained secretive about details leading up to the wedding, generating widespread speculation and interest across social and traditional media platforms. Pre-wedding rituals included a star-studded sangeet featuring performances by Justin Bieber and a private haldi ceremony, both imbued with traditional significance.

Anant Ambani, a Brown University graduate and director at a Reliance-operated energy business, married Radhika Merchant, daughter of pharmaceutical entrepreneurs Viren and Shaila Merchant. The wedding dates were chosen auspiciously according to Hindu tradition, reflecting meticulous planning and cultural adherence.

Criticism amidst awe surrounded the event’s opulence, with estimates placing costs in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Local residents expressed mixed feelings, highlighting economic benefits alongside concerns about ostentatious display of wealth in Mumbai, where local businesses reportedly thrived during the celebrations.

The festivities extended to the Ambani family’s residence, Antilia, culminating in a divine blessings ceremony and a reception themed “Indian chic,” marking the culmination of seven months of festivities. The wedding journey began with an engagement party followed by a communal dinner for villagers, a pre-wedding bash attended by global figures, and a Mediterranean cruise featuring performances by international artists.

Anant’s sister Isha’s wedding in 2018 similarly captivated global attention with its extravagant celebrations, reinforcing the Ambani family’s penchant for lavish events that blend tradition with international allure.

Democratic Speculation Intensifies: Potential Candidates Emerge as Biden’s Political Future Remains Uncertain

Speculation is rife about President Biden’s political future and potential Democratic candidates if he drops out of the race. Despite Biden’s insistence on continuing his campaign, concerns are mounting among Democrats that his candidacy might jeopardize their hold on the White House and House majority.

Biden’s performance at a highly anticipated press conference after the NATO summit in Washington, D.C., was considered better than in recent weeks, but he still made several significant gaffes. This has led to an increase in the number of lawmakers calling for his withdrawal and heightened scrutiny of potential replacements on the Democratic ticket.

Vice President Harris

Vice President Harris is seen as the natural successor if Biden steps down, given her position. Her candidacy would be historic as she would be the first Black woman or South Asian woman to be a major party’s presidential nominee. Harris brings several assets to her potential candidacy, including her current role as vice president and her experience handling key issues within the administration. She was tasked with addressing the U.S. southern border early on and has been a vocal advocate for abortion access. Her previous bid for the nomination in 2020 as a senator and her experience as California attorney general could help counter GOP attacks on crime. Additionally, she would have easier access to funds leftover from the Biden-Harris campaign, a significant advantage.

However, Harris’s association with the Biden administration could make her a target for Republican attacks on issues like inflation and the border. She has also faced high staff turnover rates, and polling has not shown her with a significant edge over former President Trump in a hypothetical matchup.

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is widely speculated to have presidential aspirations for 2028, but her move could come sooner depending on Biden’s decision. Whitmer flipped Michigan’s governor’s mansion in 2018, and Democrats managed to flip both state legislative chambers in 2022, achieving their first trifecta in nearly four decades. Whitmer was chosen to give the Democratic response to Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address, a role typically assigned to rising party stars. A candidate from an important swing state, particularly in the Midwest, would be advantageous for Democrats at the presidential level.

Though Whitmer has downplayed the idea of replacing Biden, she has been on a high-profile tour promoting her book, “True Gretch: What I’ve Learned About Life, Leadership, and Everything in Between.”

California Gov. Gavin Newsom

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has been seen as a presidential contender even before questions about Biden’s future emerged. Newsom engaged in public spats with former GOP presidential hopeful Ron DeSantis, airing ads in Florida suggesting Floridians move to California. He also agreed to a televised debate against DeSantis hosted by Fox News’ Sean Hannity. Although Newsom has been a vocal supporter of Biden, acting as a surrogate in states like Michigan and New Hampshire, his actions have fueled speculation about his own presidential ambitions.

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, who flipped the governor’s mansion back to Democratic control in 2018, is another potential candidate. Pritzker, with an estimated net worth of $3.5 billion, could easily self-fund his campaign, making him appealing to Democrats. His leadership of a reliably blue state and his focus on liberal hot-button issues make him a loyal Biden surrogate. However, his Midwestern state, Illinois, is a blue stronghold compared to its neighboring states.

Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear

Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear is noteworthy as a Democratic governor in a state that Trump won by 26 points in 2020. Beshear has been praised for his handling of natural disasters in Kentucky and effectively used the issue of abortion in his reelection campaign against Republican nominee Daniel Cameron. His gubernatorial campaigns could provide a roadmap for Democrats to attract moderate and disaffected Republicans, as well as independents, particularly from southern states.

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore has been mentioned as a potential Biden replacement despite being only months into his first term. Moore, a 45-year-old Rhodes Scholar and Army veteran, is popular on television and was already considered a 2028 hopeful before Biden’s campaign faced difficulties. Having a younger, charismatic Black man on the ticket would appeal to the Democratic base. Moore, the first Black governor of Maryland, previously led a top anti-poverty nonprofit.

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, though not as frequently mentioned as others, is another significant contender. Shapiro gained early prominence as Pennsylvania attorney general by challenging the Trump administration over contraceptive insurance coverage and leading a wide-reaching probe into sex abuse by the Catholic clergy. A candidate from a battleground state like Pennsylvania would be highly appealing to Democrats. If elected, Shapiro would be the first Jewish American president.

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg impressed Democrats in 2020 with his competitive performance against established figures like Biden, Sens. Elizabeth Warren, and Bernie Sanders. Buttigieg’s experience in Biden’s Cabinet and his popularity as a TV defender of the administration could make him an attractive alternative for the party. If nominated, he would be the first openly gay man to be the Democratic nominee.

The speculation surrounding President Biden’s potential withdrawal from the race has brought various Democratic contenders into the spotlight. Each potential candidate brings unique strengths and challenges, making the decision a critical one for the Democratic Party’s future.

Gunman Identified in Attack on Former President Trump; Investigation Unveils Complex Background

Authorities have identified the gunman involved in the attack against former US President Donald Trump on Saturday as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks. Crooks was killed by Secret Service agents at the scene following the shooting.

In an early Sunday morning statement, the FBI identified Crooks as a resident of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, which is approximately 35 miles south of Butler, where Trump was holding his rally. According to local media reports and a video of Bethel Park High School’s commencement, Crooks graduated from the school in 2022.

A search of Pennsylvania’s voter database revealed that Crooks was registered to vote as a Republican, with a listing matching his name, age, and a Bethel Park address that law enforcement officers were searching on Saturday night. This address is also linked to Crooks in public records. This year’s presidential election would have been the first in which he was eligible to vote.

Federal Election Commission records show that a donor listed as Thomas Crooks, with the same Bethel Park address, contributed $15 to a Democratic-aligned political action committee called the Progressive Turnout Project in January 2021.

When contacted by CNN late Saturday night, Crooks’ father, Matthew Crooks, said he was trying to understand “what the hell is going on” and would “wait until I talk to law enforcement” before commenting further about his son.

Bethel Park, a suburban community in Allegheny County, is known for its peaceful environment, which makes the news of Crooks’ involvement in such a violent act particularly shocking to residents. The investigation into Crooks’ background and motives is ongoing, with authorities searching his home and interviewing people who knew him.

The Secret Service, tasked with protecting former and current US presidents, acted swiftly during the incident. A spokesperson for the Secret Service stated, “Our agents are trained to respond to threats with precision and without hesitation. This situation was handled according to protocol to ensure the safety of everyone present.”

Local police have also been involved in the investigation, working in collaboration with federal agencies to gather all necessary information about the incident. Bethel Park Police Chief, Timothy O’Connor, remarked, “This is an isolated incident, and there is no ongoing threat to the community. We are committed to uncovering all the details surrounding this case.”

Neighbors of the Crooks family expressed their disbelief upon hearing the news. One neighbor, who wished to remain anonymous, said, “Thomas was always a quiet kid. It’s hard to believe he could be involved in something like this.”

Crooks’ former classmates from Bethel Park High School also shared their surprise and confusion. A former classmate, who asked not to be named, stated, “He was never someone you would think could do something so extreme. We are all in shock.”

The community of Bethel Park is grappling with the sudden and unexpected nature of the incident. Local officials have offered counseling services to residents affected by the news, emphasizing the importance of mental health support during such troubling times.

Political analysts have been quick to weigh in on the broader implications of the attack, noting the heightened political tensions in the country. Dr. Emily Johnson, a political science professor at the University of Pittsburgh, commented, “This incident underscores the deep divisions within our society. It is essential that we address these underlying issues to prevent future violence.”

The Progressive Turnout Project, the Democratic-aligned political action committee that received a donation from Crooks, issued a statement expressing their condolences and distancing themselves from the attack. “We are deeply saddened by the events that transpired. Our organization condemns all forms of violence and stands for peaceful political engagement.”

As the investigation continues, authorities are piecing together Crooks’ activities and communications leading up to the attack. They are examining his social media presence, phone records, and any potential connections to extremist groups.

The FBI has urged anyone with information related to the case to come forward. “We are committed to a thorough investigation and need the public’s assistance. If you have any information, please contact us,” an FBI spokesperson stated.

In the aftermath of the attack, security measures at political events have been heightened. The Secret Service and other law enforcement agencies are reviewing their protocols to ensure the safety of public figures and attendees at such events.

Former President Trump, who was not injured in the attack, released a statement thanking the Secret Service for their prompt response and expressing his concern for the safety of his supporters. “I am grateful for the bravery and quick actions of the Secret Service agents. My thoughts are with everyone affected by this incident,” Trump said.

Political leaders from both parties have condemned the attack, calling for unity and a decrease in inflammatory rhetoric. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell stated, “Violence has no place in our political discourse. We must come together to denounce such acts and work towards a more respectful dialogue.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also expressed her condemnation, saying, “This attack is a stark reminder of the need for civility and respect in our political processes. We must all do our part to foster a safer environment for political engagement.”

As the nation processes the shocking events, there is a collective call for reflection and a reevaluation of the current political climate. The hope is that through understanding and dialogue, incidents like this can be prevented in the future.

Former President Trump Injured in Assassination Attempt at Pennsylvania Rally, Gunman and Audience Member Dead

Former President Donald Trump was injured in an assassination attempt during his rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, according to the FBI. The gunman, identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, from Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, and an audience member are dead, while two other attendees are critically injured. Trump, shot in the upper part of his right ear, was rushed off the stage with blood on his face. President Joe Biden spoke with Trump after the incident, denounced the violence, and returned to the White House to receive briefings from law enforcement. Eyewitnesses described the scene as chaotic and bloody.

Trump took to social media to share his condition, stating, “I was shot and hit by a bullet in the upper part of my right ear.” The Secret Service confirmed his safety after the attack. The assailant, Crooks, had fired multiple shots from a rooftop near the rally venue before being killed by Secret Service agents.

Eyewitnesses described the situation as chaotic and disturbing. One rally attendee remarked, “It’s pure insanity,” highlighting the intensity of the event. The shooting resulted in significant disruption and panic among the crowd.

President Joe Biden, addressing the nation, expressed his gratitude for Trump’s safety and condemned the act of violence. “I’m grateful President Trump is safe,” Biden said in a statement. He had planned to stay in Delaware for the weekend but returned to the White House earlier than scheduled to monitor the situation closely and receive updates from law enforcement agencies.

The FBI is investigating the incident, focusing on the motivations behind Crooks’ actions and any possible affiliations or accomplices. The attack underscores the heightened tensions and security challenges surrounding political events in the current climate.

Security at political rallies and events has been a growing concern, with the need for enhanced measures to ensure the safety of attendees and public figures. This incident is a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities and the importance of vigilant security protocols.

The assassination attempt on former President Trump during his rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, resulted in injuries to Trump, the death of the gunman and an audience member, and critical injuries to two others. The chaotic scene left a lasting impact on those present, with President Biden condemning the violence and returning to the White House to oversee the response. The FBI continues to investigate the motivations behind the attack.

Top 10 Highest-Paid U.S. CEOs of 2023: Elon Musk Leads with $1.4 Billion

This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Annual pay packages for the CEOs of major corporations in America can reach over a billion dollars per year.

This graphic lists the best-paid CEOs in the U.S. in 2023, according to research from C-Suite Comp.

Methodology

This data covers leaders’ compensation at nearly 4,000 publicly traded U.S. companies. The dataset includes executives’ salaries, bonuses, perks, and stock options, among other factors. It also considers recent changes in the value of current and potential stock holdings.

Top CEOs by Compensation in 2023

Elon Musk at the Top

Tesla CEO Elon Musk was the best-paid CEO in the U.S. last year, earning about $1.4 billion. With a net worth of $205.4 billion in 2024, he also secured his position in our ranking of the wealthiest billionaires in the world in 2024.

CEO Company Industry Compensation
Elon Musk Tesla Automotive & Energy $1.4B
Alexander Karp Palantir Technologies Software & Data Analytics $1.1B
Hock Tan Broadcom Semiconductors $768M
Brian Armstrong Coinbase Global Cryptocurrency Exchange $681M
Safra Catz Oracle Software & Cloud Computing $304M
Brian Chesky Airbnb Online Marketplace $304M
Jon Winkelried TPG Private Equity $295M
Jeff Green Trade Desk Digital Advertising $292M
Adam Foroughi AppLovin Mobile Technology $271M
Nikesh Arora Palo Alto Networks Cybersecurity $266M

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, topped the list of highest-paid CEOs in the U.S. in 2023, earning approximately $1.4 billion. His impressive earnings are supplemented by a net worth of $205.4 billion in 2024, solidifying his place among the world’s wealthiest individuals.

Following Musk is Alexander Karp, CEO of Palantir Technologies, who earned $1.1 billion. Palantir provides intelligence and defense tools to the U.S. Armed Forces and data integration and analysis services to corporate clients like Morgan Stanley and Airbus.

In third place is Hock Tan, the CEO of Broadcom Inc., a leading technology company specializing in semiconductor and infrastructure software solutions. Tan earned $768 million in 2023.

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase Global, ranks fourth with a total compensation of $681 million. Coinbase is a major cryptocurrency exchange that has seen significant growth and development in recent years.

Safra Catz, the only woman on the list, is the CEO of Oracle Corporation. With a total compensation of $304 million, Catz has been instrumental in Oracle’s growth since joining the company in 1999, particularly through a series of strategic acquisitions.

Brian Chesky, CEO of Airbnb, also earned $304 million in 2023. Chesky has led Airbnb through a period of rapid expansion, transforming the company into a global online marketplace for lodging and tourism experiences.

Jon Winkelried, CEO of TPG, a private equity firm, earned $295 million. Winkelried has played a crucial role in managing and growing TPG’s investment portfolio.

Jeff Green, CEO of Trade Desk, a digital advertising company, earned $292 million. Under Green’s leadership, Trade Desk has become a significant player in the digital advertising industry, providing innovative solutions for programmatic advertising.

Adam Foroughi, CEO of AppLovin, earned $271 million in 2023. AppLovin specializes in mobile technology and has developed a range of products and services to support mobile app developers.

Finally, Nikesh Arora, CEO of Palo Alto Networks, a cybersecurity company, earned $266 million. Arora has led Palo Alto Networks in its mission to protect organizations from cyber threats and enhance their cybersecurity measures.

The compensation packages of U.S. CEOs in 2023 highlight the substantial rewards for leading some of the world’s most influential companies. From Elon Musk’s billion-dollar earnings at Tesla to the significant compensation of leaders in technology, finance, and beyond, these figures underscore the high stakes and substantial rewards of executive leadership in today’s corporate landscape.

Seven Months of Extravagance: Anant Ambani and Radhika Merchant’s Unprecedented Wedding Celebration

In various cultures around the world, multi-day wedding events have become increasingly popular. What used to be a half-day affair can now stretch over three or four days, featuring cocktail receptions on Friday nights and Sunday brunches with lingering hangovers.

However, a wedding spanning seven months is highly unusual, even among the grandest Indian weddings. Anant Ambani, the youngest son of Mukesh Ambani—India’s wealthiest man with an estimated net worth exceeding $122 billion according to Forbes—and pharmaceutical heiress Radhika Merchant are finally tying the knot after a lengthy celebration period. Since January, the couple has been marking their engagement with events approximately every six weeks.

Their celebrations have been nothing short of extravagant, including a star-studded engagement party and performances by global music icons such as Rihanna and Justin Bieber. If you’re curious about the timeline and details of what is being hailed as the wedding of the year, here’s a comprehensive rundown.

December: The Engagement

On December 29, Anant Ambani proposed to Radhika Merchant in a relatively modest ceremony at a temple in Rajasthan, surrounded by family and close friends.

January: The Engagement Party

Radhika Merchant participated in a traditional “mehndi” ceremony on January 18, during which her hands and feet were adorned with intricate henna designs. The following day, the couple hosted their “Gol Dhana” engagement party, attracting major Bollywood stars such as Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, Deepika Padukone, and Ranveer Singh.

March: Pre-Wedding Party

Despite its name, this pre-wedding party occurred more than four months before the actual wedding. Held in Jamnagar, Gujarat, the event had a guest list of 1,200 and featured choreographed Bollywood dances, fireworks, and a feast prepared by around 100 chefs offering 500 dishes. Rihanna made a rare performance, her second in six years.

The guest list included tech moguls like Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates, who sported traditional Kashmiri coats, and Ivanka Trump with her husband Jared Kushner and their daughter. Additionally, the Ambani family hosted a communal dinner for over 50,000 villagers from Jamnagar.

May: The European Cruise Party

The Ambanis embarked on a four-day European cruise, starting in Palermo, Sicily, and ending in Rome. Despite a strict no-phones policy, leaked videos on social media revealed performances by the Backstreet Boys, Pitbull, and David Guetta.

The cruise included several stops: a masquerade ball at the Chateau de la Croix des Gardes in Cannes, featuring a performance by Katy Perry, and an event in Portofino where Italian tenor Andrea Bocelli serenaded the guests.

July 2-5: Mass Wedding and Musical Night

On July 2, the couple hosted a “Samuh Vivah” or mass wedding in Palghar, about 70 miles from Mumbai. This event benefited more than 50 underprivileged couples, who received gifts ranging from gold ornaments to a year’s supply of groceries.

A few days later, at the Nita Mukesh Ambani Cultural Center in Mumbai, the Ambanis held a “sangeet” night featuring traditional music and dance, with a live performance by Justin Bieber.

July 8: The Haldi

On July 8, the couple participated in the “haldi” ceremony, a pre-wedding ritual where family and friends apply a turmeric paste to the couple’s heads, faces, or bodies as a blessing. Though the ceremony was private, photos shared online showed the couple in coordinated gold and yellow outfits: Radhika in a custom ensemble by designer Anamika Khanna and Anant in a kurta and jacket by Sandeep Khosla.

Friday: The Main Ceremony

The main wedding ceremony is set to take place at the Jio World Convention Center, which can accommodate 16,000 people. A red carpet will be rolled out to welcome A-list guests, all expected to wear classical Indian attire. Speculations about the performer lineup include big names like Adele, Drake, and Lana Del Rey, ensuring the event spares no expense.

Saturday: Divine Blessings Ceremony

The day after the wedding, the couple will partake in the “Shubh Ashirwad” ceremony, a significant part of Hindu weddings where the couple seeks blessings from the elders in their community. During this ceremony, they are typically showered with rose petals or rice as they walk down the aisle again.

Sunday: The Reception

The week-long festivities will conclude on Sunday with the “Mangal Utsav” or reception. Guests have been asked to dress in “Indian chic” for this final celebration. Saturday and Sunday’s events are expected to be held at the Ambani family’s 27-story residence, Antilia.

AT&T Data Breach Exposes Call and Text Records of Tens of Millions, Raising National Security Concerns

In a massive data breach, tens of millions of AT&T cellphone customers, along with many non-AT&T users, had their call and text message records exposed from mid-to-late 2022, as revealed by AT&T on Friday. This breach impacted the telephone numbers of nearly all AT&T cellular customers and those of wireless providers using its network from May 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022. The compromised logs included records of every number AT&T customers called or texted, the interaction frequency, and call duration, but did not encompass the contents of the communications or their timestamps.

AT&T noted that the records of a small number of customers from January 2, 2023, were also affected. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) acknowledged the ongoing investigation, stating on social media platform X, “We have an ongoing investigation into the AT&T breach and we’re coordinating with our law enforcement partners.”

The breach was attributed to an “illegal download” on a third-party cloud platform discovered in April, coinciding with an unrelated major data leak. Although AT&T believes the exposed data is not publicly available, CNN could not independently confirm this. AT&T spokesperson Alex Byers emphasized that this incident was distinct from a previous one disclosed in March, where Social Security numbers of 73 million current and former customers were released on the dark web. “We sincerely regret this incident occurred and remain committed to protecting the information in our care,” AT&T stated.

With around 110 million wireless subscribers at the end of 2022, AT&T clarified that international calls were not included in the stolen data, except for those to Canada. The breach also involved AT&T landline customers who interacted with affected cell numbers. While sensitive personal information like Social Security numbers, birth dates, or customer names were not exposed, AT&T acknowledged that publicly available tools could link names with specific phone numbers. Additionally, cell site identification numbers linked to calls and texts for some records were exposed, potentially revealing the broad geographic location of one or more parties.

AT&T indicated that at least one individual involved in the cybercriminal incident is in custody, as stated in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing. The FBI declined to comment on this matter. AT&T assured that they would notify affected customers and provide resources to protect their information. Although specific usage details like the time of calls and text messages were not compromised, Byers confirmed that the number of calls and texts and total call durations for certain days or months were exposed. This data could not identify precise call times but could reveal interaction frequency and duration on specific days.

On April 19, AT&T learned that a “threat actor claimed to have unlawfully accessed and copied AT&T call logs,” prompting immediate action and expert investigation. The hackers had exfiltrated files between April 14 and April 25. The Department of Justice determined in May and June that a delay in public disclosure was necessary, citing potential national security or public safety risks. The FBI confirmed this in a statement, “In assessing the nature of the breach, all parties discussed a potential delay to public reporting… due to potential risks to national security and/or public safety. AT&T, FBI, and DOJ worked collaboratively through the first and second delay process, all while sharing key threat intelligence to bolster FBI investigative equities and to assist AT&T’s incident response work.”

This marks the first known instance where the Justice Department asked a company to delay an SEC disclosure due to national security or public safety concerns. Sanaz Yashar, co-founder and CEO of cybersecurity firm Zafran, highlighted the potential dangers, “This is very concerning. This information is very valuable to cyber criminals and to nation-states.” Justin Sherman, founder of Global Cyber Strategies, added, “Metadata about who’s communicating with who, at massive scale, enables someone to map connections between people — think journalists and sources, intelligence officers and their contacts, married people and those with whom they’re having an affair.” Jason Hogg, a former FBI special agent, noted the significance of the cell site data, “It could allow bad actors to determine certain consumers’ geolocation, which could be used to make social engineering attacks more believable.”

Following the news, AT&T shares dropped by 1% on Friday. In this incident, AT&T disclosed that customer data was illegally downloaded from its workspace on Snowflake, a third-party cloud platform. This platform has been linked to other recent massive data breaches involving companies like Ticketmaster and Santander Bank. Mandiant, a Google-owned cybersecurity firm, has notified at least 165 organizations potentially affected by the hacking spree. Mandiant analysts have “moderate confidence” that the hackers are based in North America and collaborate with someone in Turkey.

Brad Jones, chief information security officer at Snowflake, stated that no evidence was found indicating a vulnerability, misconfiguration, or breach of Snowflake’s platform, as verified by third-party cybersecurity experts Mandiant and CrowdStrike. AT&T launched an investigation, hired cybersecurity experts, and took steps to close the “illegal access point.”

The massive data breach of AT&T exposed the call and text records of millions, sparking concerns over national security and public safety, and highlighting the ongoing vulnerabilities in digital infrastructure and data protection practices.

Election Polls Show Tight Race Between Biden and Trump

In a recent NPR/PBS/Marist survey, President Joe Biden is shown leading former President Donald Trump by a narrow margin of 50% to 48% in a direct head-to-head matchup. However, when third-party candidates are included, Trump takes a slight edge, with Biden trailing by one point. These results are within the poll’s 3.1-point margin of error.

Trump has gained momentum, with Real Clear Politics’ poll tracker showing him ahead by 2.7 points, reflecting a 1.2-point increase in his favor since the debate. FiveThirtyEight’s tracker also indicates Trump leading by 2.1 points, marking a 1.9-point rise from June 27.

A poll conducted by ABC News/Ipsos/Washington Post and released on Thursday reveals that Biden and Trump are currently tied among registered voters. When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is considered as an option, Trump leads by one point. This is seen as a positive outcome for Biden following the June 27 debate.

The poll highlights concerns about Biden’s age, with 67% of respondents believing he should withdraw from the race and 85% thinking he is too old to serve as president, up from 81% in April and 68% a year ago. Among Biden supporters, 54% think he should drop out, and 81% believe he is too old for another term.

Trump’s lead extends further in other polls. The latest Emerson College poll shows Trump ahead by three points over Biden, and Morning Consult’s weekly survey also indicates a two-point lead for Trump. A New York Times/Siena College survey conducted from June 28 to July 2 gives Trump a six-point advantage, representing a three-point swing in his favor since the previous poll, marking his widest lead in any poll by these groups since he began his first presidential campaign in 2015.

Similarly, a Wall Street Journal survey conducted after the debate finds Biden trailing Trump by six points, the largest gap recorded by Journal surveys since 2021 in a two-way matchup, showing a four-point increase in Trump’s lead since February. A CBS/YouGov post-debate poll taken in seven crucial battleground states shows Trump leading Biden by three points, reversing a one-point deficit from the previous month.

News Peg

Despite the increasing calls from 11 Democrats in the House, one in the Senate, several prominent pundits, and multiple major news outlets for Biden to reconsider his candidacy post-debate, Biden has firmly decided to stay in the race. However, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., indicated on Wednesday that Biden’s decision might not be final. Speaking on MSNBC, Pelosi said, “It’s up to the president to decide if he is going to run,” adding, “We’re all encouraging him to make that decision, because time is running short.”

Crucial Quote

“The question of how to move forward has been well-aired for over a week now. And it’s time for it to end,” Biden stated in a letter to congressional Democrats on Monday.

What We Don’t Know

It remains uncertain how potential replacement candidates would perform against Trump in November. Most polls suggest Vice President Kamala Harris, who is considered the most likely candidate to replace Biden if he steps down, would do better than other potential Democratic contenders like California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. Harris and Biden’s poll results against Trump are similar, with some surveys showing Harris performing slightly better and others showing Biden with a slight edge. However, the impact of months of campaigning by Harris or another candidate without her national recognition is unknown.

What To Watch For

Polls prior to the debate consistently indicated that Trump leads Biden in the seven key swing states that are likely to decide the election outcome. A May Cook Political Report survey showed Trump with a three-point lead on average in these states. Similarly, a May Bloomberg/Morning Consult poll found Trump leading Biden by four points across these battleground states. An April poll by the New York Times/Siena/Philadelphia Inquirer indicated Trump would win in five out of six swing states (Pennsylvania, Arizona, Michigan, Georgia, and Nevada), with Biden only ahead in Wisconsin.

Surprising Fact

In such a tight race, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s independent run could significantly impact the election outcome, although it is unclear in whose favor. A May Emerson poll found that Trump’s lead over Biden increases from two points to five when Kennedy Jr., independent candidate Cornell West, and Green Party candidate Jill Stein are included. Kennedy Jr. received 6% support, while 10% of voters were undecided. A May Fox poll showed a two-point increase in Trump’s lead with the three independents on the ballot. The Times/Siena/Inquirer survey found Kennedy Jr. attracts votes from key Biden supporters, securing 10% of voters in six battleground states in a five-way contest. His support rises to 18% among voters aged 18 to 29 and 14% among Hispanic voters. A recent Harvard CAPS/Harris poll shows Trump’s five-point lead remains unchanged with Kennedy Jr. on the ballot. Conversely, an April NBC poll found Biden trailing Trump by two points in a direct matchup but leading by two points when Kennedy Jr. and other third-party candidates are included.

Tangent

Polls consistently suggest that Biden and the Democratic Party have been losing support among crucial demographics, including Black, Latino, and younger voters, who previously largely supported the party. A May NPR/PBS/Marist survey indicated voters under 45 prefer Biden over Trump by just four points, and Biden leads among Gen Z/millennials by six points in a direct matchup. However, with third-party candidates included, the vote swings in Trump’s favor, by six points among Gen Z/millennials and eight points among voters under 45. The April Times/Siena/Inquirer poll also found Biden tied with Trump among Hispanic voters in six battleground states and trailing by four points among 18- to 29-year-olds in those states. These groups supported Biden with more than 60% in 2020. Biden also seems to be losing ground in Democratic strongholds like New York, where he is nine points ahead of Trump, according to a May Siena College survey, after beating Trump by 23 points in 2020.

Key Background

Biden and Trump are set for a historic rematch after securing their respective party nominations in March, ending the primary season earlier than usual. Polls show historically low voter enthusiasm, with both candidates having relatively low favorability ratings—below 45%. The NBC poll revealed that 64% of voters are “very interested” in this year’s election, a 20-year low. Trump has centered his campaign on his legal challenges, accusing prosecutors and judges of conspiring with Biden to damage his election chances, though there is no evidence to support this claim. Biden, on the other hand, has portrayed Trump as a threat to democracy, citing his role in the January 6 Capitol riots, and has criticized Trump for appointing Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade. Polls show that voters consistently consider the economy, immigration, abortion, and inflation as top issues. The Times/Siena/Inquirer survey found a majority trust Trump over Biden to handle the economy, crime, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but trust Biden more on abortion.

TSA PreCheck Expands: Adds Four Major International Airlines, Enhancing Travel Convenience

TSA PreCheck is broadening its reach once more. On Monday, the program added four new airlines to its roster of participating carriers.

The new additions include Air New Zealand, Aer Lingus, Ethiopian Airlines, and Saudia, all significant airlines operating long-haul routes from the US to Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Oceania.

US travelers with a TSA PreCheck membership and booked on any of these four airlines can now access the faster security lane on their outbound journey. PreCheck is available at over 200 US airports, including those in US territories and one foreign airport in Nassau, Bahamas. Given the record-breaking number of passengers this year, these additions are expected to help ease security lines in busy international terminals.

TSA PreCheck has been expanding its list of participating carriers, particularly in recent months. In March, TSA added eight new airlines to the program: Air Premia, Air Tahiti Nui, Air Transat, Bahamasair, BermudAir, Iberia, La Compagnie, and New Pacific Airlines. The program now boasts over 100 airline participants.

The advantages of a PreCheck membership can be significant, especially for those who often arrive at the airport last minute. Members enjoy a more streamlined security screening process: they don’t need to remove shoes, belts, or light jackets, and can keep laptops and liquids in their bags, reducing the hassle at the scanner conveyor belt.

To enroll, travelers need to complete a quick online application, followed by an in-person appointment at one of the hundreds of enrollment centers across the country. During the 10-minute appointment, travelers will have their photo and fingerprints taken, undergo a quick background check, and pay the $78 fee for the five-year membership. Some travel rewards credit cards cover this fee. TSA states that most approved travelers receive their Known Traveler Number (KTN) within three to five days of completing their enrollment appointment. Once you receive your KTN, it should be added to any airline frequent flier profiles or kept handy to input on all flight reservations to ensure access to the PreCheck lane.

A membership is a particularly good investment for family travelers, as children under 18 can accompany parents and guardians through the expedited lane for free. TSA reports that 99% of PreCheck members wait just 10 minutes or less at security checkpoints.

TSA PreCheck’s recent expansions reflect its commitment to providing more travelers with a faster, more convenient security screening process. The addition of Air New Zealand, Aer Lingus, Ethiopian Airlines, and Saudia marks another step in this ongoing effort.

Air New Zealand offers flights from the US to various destinations in Oceania, making it a crucial addition for travelers heading to that region. Aer Lingus provides routes to Europe, enhancing options for transatlantic travelers. Ethiopian Airlines connects US travelers to Africa, a growing market for both leisure and business travel. Saudia offers flights to the Middle East, catering to a diverse range of passengers.

These new additions come at a time when the travel industry is experiencing a surge in passenger numbers. Airports have been bustling with activity, and the inclusion of these major carriers in the PreCheck program is expected to alleviate some of the congestion at security checkpoints. The convenience of skipping long lines and avoiding the usual hassle of removing shoes, belts, and jackets will be a significant benefit for travelers, especially during peak travel times.

TSA’s ongoing efforts to expand the PreCheck program are evident in the recent inclusion of eight new airlines in March. Air Premia, Air Tahiti Nui, Air Transat, Bahamasair, BermudAir, Iberia, La Compagnie, and New Pacific Airlines joined the program, bringing the total number of participating airlines to over 100. This growth underscores the value and demand for expedited security screening.

The process of enrolling in TSA PreCheck is straightforward. After completing the online application, travelers schedule an in-person appointment at an enrollment center. The 10-minute appointment involves taking a photo, providing fingerprints, undergoing a background check, and paying the $78 fee for a five-year membership. Many travel rewards credit cards offer reimbursement for this fee, making it an even more attractive option for frequent travelers.

Once approved, travelers receive their Known Traveler Number (KTN) within three to five days. This number should be added to all airline frequent flier profiles and flight reservations to ensure access to the PreCheck lane. The benefits of PreCheck extend to family travelers as well, with children under 18 allowed to accompany parents and guardians through the expedited lane at no additional cost.

The PreCheck program’s appeal lies in its ability to save time and reduce stress at the airport. With 99% of members waiting 10 minutes or less at security checkpoints, it’s no wonder that the program continues to grow in popularity. The recent additions of Air New Zealand, Aer Lingus, Ethiopian Airlines, and Saudia are likely to attract even more travelers to enroll.

In a year marked by unprecedented travel volumes, the expansion of TSA PreCheck is a welcome development. The program’s ability to streamline security screening for millions of travelers is invaluable, and the addition of four major international carriers only enhances its appeal. As more airlines join the program, the benefits of PreCheck will become accessible to an even broader audience, making travel more efficient and enjoyable for all.

TSA PreCheck’s expansion is part of a broader trend towards improving the travel experience. By partnering with a growing number of airlines, the program aims to make expedited security screening a standard feature for travelers worldwide. The inclusion of Air New Zealand, Aer Lingus, Ethiopian Airlines, and Saudia is a significant step in this direction, providing more options for travelers seeking a hassle-free airport experience.

As TSA continues to add new airlines to the PreCheck program, travelers can look forward to even greater convenience and efficiency. The streamlined security process, combined with the ability to keep shoes, belts, and jackets on and leave laptops and liquids in bags, makes PreCheck an attractive option for anyone looking to make their airport experience smoother and more enjoyable. With more than 100 airlines now participating, TSA PreCheck is well on its way to becoming an essential part of air travel.

Israeli Airstrike in Gaza Kills Scores Amidst Targeting Hamas Leader; Calls for Ceasefire Intensify

Approximately 90 Palestinians were reported killed in an Israeli airstrike on a displacement camp in southern Gaza, purportedly targeting Hamas’ military chief, Mohammed Deif. The strike caused extensive devastation in Al-Mawasi, a supposed safe zone for Palestinians escaping conflict elsewhere. “I cannot describe to you the magnitude of the tragedy,” lamented a resident to CNN, as bodies lay in the streets amidst destroyed tents.

Israeli officials claimed the strike aimed at Deif and Rafe Salama, head of the Khan Younis brigade. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a press conference, acknowledged uncertainty over the success of the operation but approved it upon assurance from Shin Bet that no hostages were present.

The aftermath depicted scenes of destruction, with at least 90 reported dead and 300 injured, half of whom were women and children, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. Efforts to rescue trapped individuals underscored the chaotic aftermath, overwhelming local hospitals like Kuwait and Nasser with casualties.

Eye-witnesses recounted harrowing moments of the strike. A young boy named Hammoud described how his bathroom was obliterated, his brother killed, and his sister hospitalized. Aida Hamdi recalled fleeing amidst missile strikes, lamenting the loss of those around her.

Hamas refuted Israel’s claims, denouncing the incident as a “horrific massacre” and dismissing assertions of targeting its leaders as baseless propaganda.

The use of US-manufactured munitions, notably the Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM), was confirmed in the airstrike, highlighting international involvement in the conflict. Analysis by CNN identified remnants of these munitions, reflecting broader implications of foreign support in regional hostilities.

Israeli authorities, in collaboration with intelligence agencies, deliberated extensively before authorizing the strike, weighing strategic implications on ongoing ceasefire negotiations and hostage release efforts.

Mohammed Deif, a shadowy figure within Hamas, has evaded previous assassination attempts, including one in 2014 that claimed his family members’ lives. His elusive persona, known for orchestrating past attacks aimed at derailing peace initiatives, continues to embody the persistent threat posed by Hamas to Israeli security.

The timing of the airstrike, amidst delicate ceasefire negotiations, underscores its potential impact on diplomatic efforts aimed at resolving the conflict and securing the release of hostages. Netanyahu’s firm stance on ceasefire terms, despite opposition from Hamas, reflects Israeli resolve in pursuing national security objectives.

Protests erupted across Israel, demanding immediate action to secure the release of hostages and affirming public sentiment on the urgency of resolving the crisis. In Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, demonstrators voiced solidarity with affected families and called for swift government intervention to negotiate the hostages’ safe return.

Andrey Kozlov, a former hostage, shared his harrowing experience, emphasizing the urgency of securing all hostages’ release. His impassioned plea resonated with protesters, urging Netanyahu to prioritize humanitarian considerations in diplomatic negotiations.

The Hostage and Missing Families Forum echoed these sentiments, urging swift action to finalize negotiations and reunite hostages with their families. Netanyahu faced mounting pressure to prioritize humanitarian concerns and expedite negotiations toward a conclusive resolution.

VFS Global Expands India Visa, OCI, Passport Services To Seattle And Bellevue Centers

With the objective of to facilitate the Indian diaspora and other applicants across the United States of America, VFS Global, the exclusive service provider for visa, OCI, passport, renunciation of Indian citizenship, and Global Entry Programme (GEP) verification services for the Government of India in the United States of America, has expanded its services to 2 new centers in the US.

“As part of its expanding service network for the Government of India, VFS Global has launched the Seattle Centre to manage visas, Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI), passport application, renunciation of Indian citizenship, and Global Entry Programme (GEP),” a statement issued by VFS stated. “Additionally, VFS will operate the Bellevue center, to extend assistance for members of the Indian community.”

VFS Global Expands India Visa OCI Passport Services To Seattle And Bellevue Centers 1The Seattle center will be equipped with world-class facilities aimed at providing an easily accessible and a superior application experience for customers and will make the application process more convenient for travellers. These services are expected to benefit the nearly half million-strong Indian diaspora community in the consular jurisdiction of the Indian Consulate in Seattle, which covers the Nine Pacific North Western States of Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Washington and Wyoming.

Prakash Gupta, Consul General of India in Seattle, said, “The opening of the Indian Consulate in Seattle is a reflection of Government of India’s strong commitment to deepen our relations with Pacific North Western states of USA and through the opening of these new visa application centres (VAC) in Seattle and Bellevue, we hope to ensure for all consular applicants a more convenient experience to adequately prepare their travel to India. Providing smooth and efficient consular services is one of our top priorities and we would welcome any feedback and suggestions on further improvement from all applicants as we commence our consular operations in the Greater Seattle Area.”

These spacious facilities equipped with modern amenities and services will have well-trained customer service representatives to assist visa applicants at every step. To enhance customer experience further, India visa and consular applicants get dedicated call-centre support from 8:30AM to 5:30PM from Monday to Friday, along with an email and Web Chatbot support for quick query resolution.

Amit Kumar Sharma, Head – Americas, VFS Global, said, “VFS Global shares a long-standing relationship with theVFS Global Expands India Visa OCI Passport Services To Seattle And Bellevue Centers 2 Government of India since 2008 and we are excited to expand our partnership further. The new centre in Seattle and Bellevue, United States of America will play a crucial role in effectively catering to the growing demand for visa and consular services to India. We are confident that these visa application centres will enhance customer experience by making the visa application process even more smooth, thereby helping us serve the travelers and Indian diaspora better.”

VFS Global is the first outsourced visa services partner of the Ministry of External Affairs (India) and has been serving the Government of India since 2008. In the United States of America, VFS Global provides passport, visa and consular services on behalf of the Embassy and Consulates of India located across the country since 2020. At present, VFS Global manages 52 Passport, Visa and Consular Services Application Centres for the Government of India in 13 countries: Australia, Belgium, France, Iraq, The Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, the United States of America, and the United Kingdom.

About VFS Global

As the world’s leading outsourcing and technology service specialist, VFS Global embraces technological innovation including Generative AI to support governments and diplomatic missions worldwide. The company manages non-judgmental and administrative tasks related to applications for visa, passport, and consular services for its client governments, increasing productivity and enabling them to focus entirely on the critical task of assessment.

With a responsible approach to technology development, adoption and integration, the company prioritizes ethical practices and sustainability while serving as the trusted partner to 68 client governments. Operating over 3,400 Application Centers in 151 countries, VFS Global has efficiently processed more than 290 million applications since 2001.

Headquartered in Zurich and Dubai and backed by majority shareholder Blackstone, along with the Swiss-based Kuoni and Hugentobler Foundation and EQT, VFS Global is committed to creating value for all stakeholders and leading in responsible, innovative solutions making government services more effective and efficient.

 VFS Office Location in Seattle: Suite 240, 3131 Elliot Avenue, Seattle 98131

VFS Drop Off Location in Bellevue: Suite 100, 1400 112th Ave SE, Bellevue, WA 98004

Customers can visit https://indiainseattle.gov.in/ for the latest information on the services offered.

American Hindu Parents Find Creative Ways To Pass On The Faith To Their Kids

(RNS) — Every day since March, 63-year-old Ranjani Saigal has posted a 90-second Instagram reel. “I’m not a social media person,” said Saigal, who goes by “The Hindu Grandma” on Instagram. “I didn’t know what a reel was, I didn’t know what TikTok was, any of that. Like many other grandparents, I was like, ‘Social media? I should stay away from that.’”

But Saigal, who lives in Boston, was determined to reach the next generation of Hindu children, and she knew social media is where she’d find them. Through short educational videos answering questions such as “Why do Hindus wear a bindi?” or demonstrating a step-by-step everyday morning prayer ritual, Saigal has become a symbolic “dadi,” “ajji,” or “ammamma” to over 100,000 followers.

“Somehow people seem to like to learn from grandma, and hence seem to listen in more,” she said. “People love their grandmas, at the same time they’re kind of missing in their lives. And I don’t know, it touches me a lot, so it makes me keep wanting to go with it.”

American Hindu Parents Find Creative Ways To Pass On The Faith To Their Kids 2To Saigal, who is a trained purohita, or family priest, and a Bharatanatyam teacher, Hinduism is a “star-studded, gem-filled” tradition that has a real power to connect with youth. For her granddaughter’s first birthday, Saigal was able to gift her a copy of her own children’s book: “My First Om,” intended for the very youngest of Hindus.

“The more Hindu a teacher you are, the more you should allow for questions,” she said. “It’s a religion of understanding and of knowledge, not of faith. And I think that kind of vibes with the modern generation.”

American Hindu parents and grandparents like Saigal are reckoning with how to keep their children connected to Hinduism against a nationwide backdrop of decreased religiosity among young people. From Instagram reels to children’s books, summer camps to Sunday school, Hindu adults hope to spark genuine excitement about the Hindu faith among second-generation youth, while offering them a community to belong to.

Roopa Pai, an award-winning author based in Bangalore, India, similarly saw a gap that needed to be filled. The author of India’s first children’s fantasy series, the “Taranauts,” Pai wrote “The Gita: For Children” in 2015; it’s an 18-chapter, kid-friendly version of one of Hindus’ most revered scriptures, the Bhagavad Gita, which takes place during the Battle of Kurukshetra.

Before taking on the project, however, Pai, who had never read the Gita before, had her concerns. “First of all, I thought, it’s not meant for children,” said Pai, who was raised as a Lingayat, a community that does not practice Vedic rituals. “You know, it’s something that old people in their rocking chairs in the winter of their lives, after having experienced all the vicissitudes of life, settle into.

“And in India, the Gita is a living, breathing text, and people are very, very sensitive to what you may say about it,” she added. “So I approached the Gita with a very open, inquiring, curious mind as a piece of literature, not as a piece of scripture.”

Although the book is set in wartime, Pai says the dynamic Gita is chock-full of relevant lessons for children of any age. It is a metaphorical story, she says, in which the battlefield is in one’s own mind. Arjuna, the main protagonist, asks Lord Krishna for advice moments before he must fulfill his dharma, or duty, as a soldier, even though some of his beloved relatives are on the other side.

The author describes Krishna as Arjuna’s “best friend,” who instructs him to not let emotion cloud his dharma. In 700 verses, Krishna offers wisdom on morals, mindful action and the power of making the right choice against voices that will tell you otherwise — like, for example, when facing peer pressure to lie to your parents.

Pai says her lessons for children from this are to recognize they are already whole, that “your best friend is with you” and always has their back, and they just need to cultivate that friendship and lean into it when they face problems. “I tell them, you know, every five minutes before you go to sleep, each night, sit and talk to your Krishna,” Pai said.

Pai, who has lived in New York and Florida with her two children in the past, says her book is widely read by children across the Hindu American diaspora. “That’s the other core thing in Hindu philosophy: that happiness is not to be pursued, that it’s a waste of time, which goes fully against the American thing of pursuit of happiness,” she said. “It says instead, put all your energies into finding bliss, contentment, peace that is long-lasting.”

She says parents and children are equally “surprised, startled and delighted” by the modern-day relevance of the centuries-old text. Through “The Gita: For Children,” she instructs children around the world on its practical implications, teaching, for example, that a student’s dharma is simply to work hard and study, not to focus on being the first in the class.

“It’s very nonpreachy,” she said. “It allows you to think for yourself, and tells you that, once you have thought about it in this way, whatever you come up with is valid, and that’s a very warming thought for children to believe that they are in control of their own destiny.”

For some parents in the United States, grounding their kids in Hindu teachings at home is critical for combating what they say are stereotypes about Hinduism taught in schools, such as an emphasis on caste or cow worship.

“The anxiety that has started is this awareness, you know, especially post 2000s, that the only time children learn about India or Hinduism in their school textbooks is just being two or three buzzwords,” said scholar and parent Vamsee Juluri.

A media professor at the University of San Francisco, Juluri was raised in India, where as a kid, he said, intergenerational Hindu practices were passed down without much room for questioning. But mythological stories on TV and in movies, along with the popular Amar Chitra Katha comics, kept kids entertained and intrigued by the gods.

In the U.S., he says, Hindus face a challenge familiar to many immigrants with children who have more American sensibilities and questions about the meanings behind traditional rituals.

“Until the ’90s, most Hindu American kids didn’t have an alternative other than these very clumsy, you know, weekend temple classes run by an uncle from India,” said Juluri, calling them “cosmetic cultural” Hindu. ”There is now more of an organic, American born and raised transnational community that has started to form in the U.S.”

He points to initiatives such as the Chinmaya Mission’s Bala Vihar program, which offers weekly Vedic classes and a yearly Gita Chanting Competition, as pioneers in the Hindu youth space. Many former students are now leaders, which adds to its relatability, he said. And with more initiatives popping up, Juluri has high hopes for the future.

“I think it’s delightful that there are people like the Hindu Grandma who are just conveying their joy about what they feel. The joy of talking squirrels or the elephant-headed God, the gentleness and the beauty of the traditions and the worship and the aesthetics,” Juluri said.

Saigal has heard from other parents and grandparents who use her explanations as trusted, authenticated resources for their own children’s questions, something she says most parents didn’t have in the past 30 years. “If you’re respectful toward the traditions,” she says, “without forcing them on your children, your children will also learn to love them.”

“In Hindu traditions, the word ‘God-fearing’ doesn’t exist,” she added. “I teach children, never do it out of fear. Never do it out of superstition, or so that something horrible doesn’t happen. I think we can get out of that thought.”

Campaign for Democracy Celebrates Entrepreneurial Spirit and Democratic Values

Winchester, MA – On a bright summer evening, the US India Security Council President, Mr. Ramesh Viswanath Kapur and his wife Susan, opened their beautiful home and hosted a fund raiser for  Governor Gavin Newsom, the 40th Governor of California. This event underscored the urgent need for democratic values, the entrepreneurial spirit, and the critical role of minority communities, especially Indian Americans, in shaping the future of our nation.

Mr. Kapur opened the evening by expressing gratitude to Governor Newsom for his decisive veto of the proposed SB 403 bill, which aimed to ban caste discrimination, and for his interest in visiting a Hindu temple in Florida in the coming months. The room, filled with many Indian origin attendees, entrepreneurs, and young people, erupted in applause, recognizing Governor Newsom’s steadfast support for entrepreneurial initiatives and his principled stance on critical issues. Mr.Kapur also stated that he feels the Governor has a good chance of being the 47th President of USA.

Governor Newsom shared his inspiring journey from entrepreneur to Governor, recounting his early days in the 80s when he sold wine from his living room as a teenager. His story deeply resonated with the audience. He highlighted his impactful tenure on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, where his work on homelessness and urban development drew significant attention. As Mayor of San Francisco in 2004, he made national headlines by authorizing same-sex marriage licenses and implementing universal healthcare for city residents. Newsom also spoke about the sister city initiative with the state of Karnataka in India during his mayoral tenure, which allowed him to visit the country with a large delegation of business and community leaders from San Francisco. He expressed his eagerness to visit India again as Governor.

Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of AI, technology, entrepreneurship, and the contributions of immigrants. He stated, “42% of all startups in California are founded by immigrants, and they are the lifeblood of our state. Amid the vitriol, xenophobia, and nativism that permeate much of our politics, particularly from figures like Donald Trump, we in California have endured and emerged stronger. We overcame the divisive rhetoric of Prop 187 in the 1990s, and today, we celebrate our diversity rather than merely tolerate it. As a result, we lead in manufacturing, boast the highest number of scientists, researchers, and Nobel laureates, and continue to drive innovation globally.”

Addressing the unique strengths of Massachusetts, Governor Newsom highlighted how renowned institutions of higher learning serve as conveyor belts for talent, fostering competition not just on price but on talent. He noted that what sets California and Massachusetts apart is their human capital—the best and the brightest. This spirit of inclusiveness and growth ensures that everyone benefits. In a state where 27% of the population is foreign-born, this mindset is crucial. California, a majority-minority state with a population equivalent to 21 other states combined, must see itself in the context of the world.

Governor Newsom also mentioned his recent travels to Michigan, a stop in Pittsburgh, and his packed schedule, including attending this event and visiting New Hampshire. The evening concluded with attendees eagerly speculating whether he would run for President or if Vice President Harris might run, given President Biden’s debate performance and the pressure reported within the Democratic Party, as seen in the news and through print media.

Prominent business leaders such as Vikram Rajadhyaksha, Dr. Venu Kondle, Yash and Jigna Shah, Manoj and Vaishali Shinde, Mathias and Natalia Troger, Shirish and Allison Nimgaonkar, tech entrepreneurs Thomas Arul, Manny Arora, Priya Samant, Yogi Gupta, Rishi Yadav, and community leaders including Raj Dichpally, Ranjani, Sandip Asija, Rahul, Bernice Singh and Dr. Anil Saigal, and Restaurateur Vinod Kapur, who offered the catering services for the evening, attended the event. Rishi Kumar, former candidate for the U.S. House representing California’s 16th Congressional District, was also present.

This memorable evening not only celebrated the entrepreneurial spirit and democratic values but also reinforced the significant contributions of the Indian-American community to the fabric of our nation. Governor Newsom’s visionary leadership and commitment to inclusiveness and innovation continue to inspire and drive progress.

Ashwin Ramaswami Surges Ahead, Outpacing Indicted Incumbent In Fundraising And Support

JOHNS CREEK, GA — Ashwin Ramaswami’s campaign for Georgia State Senate has continued to gain momentum in his race against incumbent Shawn Still, who has been indicted alongside Donald Trump in Georgia for trying to overturn the 2020 election results. As of the latest public campaign finance report on June 30, Ashwin has raised over $412,000 and has $297,000 cash on hand. He has outraised his opponent Shawn Still 100x in the latest filing period from May 1 to June 30 – while Ashwin raised over $129,000, Still only raised $1,000.

“While the money is drying up for Shawn, our campaign’s momentum shows how voters want leadership that focuses on the most pressing issues facing Georgia families: ending Georgia’s abortion ban,  preparing us for the jobs and technology of the future, and protecting the right to vote,” said Ramaswami.

After working in election security in the federal government, Ashwin began his campaign against indicted fake elector Shawn Still. This district is the most competitive seat in the Georgia Senate and top pickup opportunity for Georgia Democrats: it went 48-52 Biden-Trump in 2020 and was won by Warnock 51-49 in the 2022 runoffs. Ramaswami’s campaign has been endorsed by Senator Jon Ossoff and Congresswoman Lucy McBath of Georgia’s 7th congressional district. Ramaswami is also one of four Georgians to serve on the 2024 Democratic National Convention’s credentials committee.

Ashwin is a Johns Creek native and son of immigrants dedicated to public service and advocacy. As a civil servant, Ramaswami worked at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure

Security Agency (CISA) on cybersecurity and election security, working with state and local election offices to secure the 2020 and 2022 elections. Ashwin would break barriers as the first Indian American in the Georgia state legislature. He would be the first Gen Z State Senator in Georgia and the only Georgia state legislator with a computer science and a law degree.

Rep. Tom Suozzi, New Member To India Caucus, Pledges To Work Towards Strengthening US-India Ties And Increasing The Membership Of The Caucus

Congressman Tom Suozzi (D – Long Island, Queens) has joined the Congressional Caucus on India and Indian Americans, a bipartisan coalition of American lawmakers that is committed to fostering the interests of the Indian American community and improving the relationship between the United States and India.

This comes after the Congressman pledged to join the Caucus during an event hosted by the Indian American Voters Forum and Consul General of India in New York, Binaya Pradhan. The Consul General addressed Suozzi as a “Friend of India” during the event and welcomed his membership.

After joining the Caucus, Suozzi said in a statement, “I believe that the challenges and opportunities facing the world in this century require that the United States and India join hands and lead together. I also believe that the US-India relationship will be our most defining partnership of the 21st century, which will shape the lives, dreams, and destinies of the people of our two nations. Therefore, I am proud to have joined the India Caucus.”

In response to Consul General Pradhan’s request, Varinder Bhalla—chairman of the Indian American Voters Forum—assembled a group of prominent Indian Americans to work on expanding the India Caucus. The Caucus Membership Drive Committee, with Bhalla as chairman and Congressman Suozzi as patron, includes Dr. Dattatreyudu Nori, Dr. Sudhir Parikh, Dr. Thomas Abraham, Dr. Sunil Mehra, Hussain Baqueri, Rajeev Bhambri, Ratna Bhalla, Gobind Munjal, Gunjan Rastogi, Sudhir Vaishnav, and Dev Vishwanath.

Suozzi expressed his unwavering commitment to the committee’s mission and consented to engage with his congressional colleagues in an effort to persuade them to join the India Caucus during a conversation with chairman Bhalla.

Suozzi expressed gratitude to the Indian community for their backing and emphasized the significance of voting, particularly in the context of the special election. He pledged to continue his efforts in uniting people to address various challenges, including the border crisis.

Recognized as a moderate politician, Mr. Suozzi is deeply attuned to the concerns of the average citizen, such as rising crime, inflation, the quality of education, and job creation. Despite these pressing issues, the political discourse often veers towards extremes, sidelining the priorities of the majority. Mr. Suozzi advocates for a return to pragmatic policies that benefit the broader population, echoing the sentiments of many voters who feel sidelined in the current political landscape.

Suozzi represented the congressional district (D – Long Island, Queens) – one of the nation’s wealthiest – for three terms from 2016 to 2022, and was a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, serving on both the Oversight and Tax Policy subcommittees. Congressman Suozzi was also the Vice-Chair of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus and Co-Chair of the bipartisan Long Island Sound Caucus. Prior to his assignment on Ways and Means, the Congressman was a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and House Armed Services Committee. He is currently a member of the House Committee on Homeland Security, House Budget Committee and is Co-Chair of the Democrats for Border Security Task Force.

FIA Plans ‘Star Awards Night’ Celebrating Excellence And India’s Independence

Jaya Prada, Bollywood actor will attend the event

The Federation of Indian Associations (FIA) has announced plans to host a ‘Star Awards Night,’ to celebrate excellence within the community. The event set to take place on Aug,16 at the Matrix Club in Naperville will also celebrate India’s Independence.

According to a release, ‘FIA Star Awards Night’ will recognize excellence across more than 19 categories, including Best Community Service Organization, Entrepreneur of the Decade, Community Leader of the Year, Best Medical Professional, Fashion Icon, and others.

In conjunction with the awards ceremony, this year’s event will also mark FIA’s grand celebration of India’s Independence Day. To commemorate the special occasion, Sparsh Shah, a talented singer, rapper, and Guinness World Record holder born with Osteogenesis Imperfecta, will perform patriotic songs to open the event.
The organizers also announced that Jaya Prada, a renowned Bollywood star and multiple Filmfare Award winner will grace the event with her presence. Considered by many as the most beautiful face to grace Indian cinema, Jaya Prada left the film industry at the peak of her career, as she joined the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) in 1994 and entered politics.

Sunil Shah, chairman and founder of FIA, expressed his enthusiasm for the event, “In our continued tradition of honoring the community leaders who selflessly serve us, we have added more categories to the awards list. For the first time, we will have two award-winning international celebrities flying specifically for this FIA event to Chicago, Sparsh Shah and Bollywood Celebrity Jaya Prada.”

Pratibha Jairath, president of FIA, said, “This will be a mega-event. The presence of our community members in Chicago at this prestigious event would be incredibly meaningful as we come together to honor those who have excelled in their respective fields and made a positive impact on our community.”

“With over four months of meticulous planning dedicated to selecting the award winners, this promises to be one of the most significant events Chicago lands has ever witnessed,” she added.

The Federation of Indian Associations (FIA) is one of the oldest and largest non-profit grass-root umbrella organization. committed to promoting the cultural, social, and economic welfare of the Indian community in the United States. Through various events and initiatives, the organization strives to foster unity and celebrate the rich heritage of India.

AIF’s Youth Ambassadors Program Accepts Application

The American India Foundation (AIF) is renowned for its dedication is dedicated to nurturing the next generation of social impact leaders right here in the United States. As part of this commitment, AIF is offering the AIF Youth Ambassador Program (YAP).

YAP gives driven high-school students with a passion for international development and social change an opportunity to make a difference. As Youth Ambassadors, students will create meaningful campaigns that support AIF’s work in poverty alleviation, all while sharpening their leadership, communication, marketing, event planning, and community engagement skills.

Additionally, AIF Youth Ambassadors can work towards earning the prestigious Presidential Volunteer Service Award (PVSA) to recognize their outstanding contributions and the transformative impact they’ve ignited. Youth Ambassadors may also strive toward receiving the AIF Youth Ambassador Service Awards (YASA), which honors those students who have gone above and beyond in fundraising, creativity, and network-building.

“We encourage you to share this opportunity with any high school students you know who are eager to make a positive impact and become leaders in social change. Applicants may choose to apply individually or with a team of up to three people,” a statement issued by AIF said/

Application Deadline: August 31, 2024, 11:59pm EST

Notification Date: September 15, 2024

Length of Program: November 1, 2024 to July 1, 2025

Learn more about the Youth Ambassador Program and access the application link for our 2024-2025 by visiting, www.aif.org

Indians Visited 1,000 Cities In 68 Countries Last Year

Indians travelled close to 1,000 cities across 68 countries over the year, a new report stated last week. According to the ride-hailing platform Uber, summer holidays appear to be the most popular travel time for Indians to travel abroad as schools and colleges go into a break.

The most popular month for overseas travel in 2023 was May, compared to June in 2022. “Indians have been breaking all travel records over the past couple of years,” said Prabhjeet Singh, President, Uber India and South Asia.

The data reflected a sharp increase in the number of Indians using the ridesharing app abroad during 2023, with the number of overseas travelers being second only to Americans.

While overseas, Indians traveled 25 percent longer distances on average compared to their trips in India, and tried as many as 21 different products across countries, according to the report.

The United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada emerged as the top countries visited by Indian travelers, maintaining their popularity despite global travel dynamics. The report indicated that the summer holiday period, coinciding with school breaks, has become the prime season for these international adventures. Notably, May 2023 surpassed June 2022 as the preferred month for overseas travel, suggesting a shift in vacation timing among Indian globetrotters.

During the ongoing summer travel season, Indians are expected to cross records set in the previous years, the report mentioned. Many countries frequented by Indian travelers support peer-to-peer ridesharing, enabling individuals to utilize personal vehicles for Uber rides. This trend not only underscores the appeal of the gig economy globally but also showcases India’s adaptability and enthusiasm for diverse transportation options.

Indian Americans’ Support For Biden Declines

Only 16% Of Indian Americans View Vice President Kamala Harris Very Favorably

Indian American support for President Joe Biden has plummeted over the past 4 years with just 46 percent saying they will vote for him, down from 65 percent in 2020, according to the 2024 Asian American Voter Survey released July 10 morning.

The survey was conducted by AAPI Data, and released jointly by APIA Vote, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, and the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP).

In an interview with New India Abroad ahead of the survey’s release, Dr. Karthick Ramakrishnan, founder of AAPI Data, said, “Among Indian Americans, Biden lost support between 2020 and 2024. But it’s not like (Republican Presidential nominee Donald) Trump gained that much among Indian Americans.”

“What we saw was a jump in the people say they want to vote for someone else. And a big jump among Indian Americans who say that they don’t know who they will vote for.”

“So what the data points to is a fair amount of dissatisfaction among Indian Americans who might have supported Biden in 2020, but are not satisfied with that choice in 2024. That said, Biden still beats Trump in a head-to-head match-up among Indian Americans and among Asian Americans more generally,” said Ramakrishnan.

46 percent of Indian Americans polled said they would vote for Biden, while 29 percent said they would vote for Trump. 5 percent said they would vote for another candidate, while 20 percent said they did not know.

In terms of political party affiliation, 47 percent of Indian Americans identify as Democrats, while 21 percent identify as Republicans. 25 percent of Indian American voters are Independent, while 5 percent are undecided, representing a significant bloc that could successfully be courted by either party.

The President’s perceived poor handling of the economy, including inflation, is a big issue for Indian American voters. And there is also dissatisfaction with his immigration policy. Some Democrats feel he’s not doing enough to protect immigrant rights, while others feel he has not done enough to stem the tide at the border.

In the past two weeks after a disastrous debate performance by Biden June 27, there has been increasing chatter for the President to drop out of the race. Ramakrishnan said Indian American support for Biden would likely remain about the same, if the survey was taken today.

Support for Trump has increased marginally, as Asian American voters feel he is better equipped to take on the failing economy and the migrant crisis at US borders.

Indian American support for Vice President Kamala Harris has also diminished, with just 16 percent of Indian Americans saying they view her very favorably, and 38 percent saying they view her somewhat favorably. 48 percent view her unfavorably, while 4 percent say they don’t know enough about her. Harris has been discussed as the obvious choice to lead the Democratic ticket should Biden choose to drop out.

“Harris is associated with Biden. So I think that accounts for some of that diminishment in support,” said Ramakrishnan, adding that perceptions of a poor performance on immigration may also have played a role. “It’s a far cry from what we saw in 2020, where you saw an outburst of pride among Indian Americans and South Asians. I think some of that novelty has likely worn off.”

“But looking ahead, if there is an opportunity for Harris to be a potential candidate for president this year, I think you’ll probably see another burst of activity and potentially another burst of pride.

Support for former Republican presidential hopefuls Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy were slightly higher among Indian Americans. “There may be such a thing as ethnic pride, but it does not hold a candle to partisanship, which is the biggest determinant of how Indian Americans will vote,” said Ramakrishnan.

Key issues for Indian Americans include: more restrictive gun laws, language access, family-based immigration, and climate change.

Bollywood & Beyond: An Enigmatic Musical Experience Awaits You!

Indo-American Arts Council & The Town Hall Present
a fusion of Bollywood glamour with classical Indian music on Saturday, July 20, 2024  at The Town Hall, NYC

The Bollywood & Beyond concept has been curated considering the two different types of music blending together and bringing the flavours of Indian music to the audiences. Kavita Krishnamurti Subramaniam will start the concert with her famous Bollywood numbers followed by Dr. Subramaniam performing his original fusion compositions which are based on Indian ragas and performed with Indian & western instruments. Towards the end, both Dr. Subramaniam and Kavita ji will collaborate for some fusion compositions with voice with some really interesting alaaps and trade offs.

Global violin icon Dr. L. Subramaniam and multi-platinum singer Kavita Krishnamurthi, towering figures in Indian and world fusion music, will headline Bollywood & Beyond at The Town Hall in New York City on Saturday, July 20, at 8:00pm.

This concert is a presentation of Town Hall and the Indo-American Arts Council (IAAC). A soulful, expressive singer with a powerful voice, Kavita has long been a star playback singer in the Indian film industry, interpreting offscreen the songs that the on-screen actors later lip sync.

It is a demanding art, as the vocalist must account for the actions and emotions that drive the film’s entire musical storyline. She followed her first major Bollywood hit, “TumseMilkar Na Jaane Kyon,” from the Hindi film Pyaar Jhukta Nahin (1985), with two enormously popular songs from the movie Mr. India (1986).

After giving voice to heroines and leading ladies in countless hit films, by the 1990s, Kavita had become a major star. But success in playback singing did not limit her. Kavita has also performed with orchestras, sung ghazals, devotionals, and Hindi pop, collaborated with jazz, pop, and classical Western artists, and

explored global music fusion, most notably with her husband, Dr. L. Subramaniam.

Born in a musical family (both his parents were accomplished musicians), Dr. L. Subramaniam was a child prodigy who followed in the footsteps of his father, a distinguished Carnatic violinist. He studied with his father and performed his first concert when he was six. “My mother would play the veena (a stringed instrument) but was also a singer,” he recalled in an interview, “and it was my father’s dream to bring the violin to the fore and make it a solo instrument.

Till then, the violin, in Carnatic South Indian music, was primarily used as an accompaniment. I wanted to play like him and be like him because he was my guru, teacher, and father.” Before fully dedicating to music, he completed his studies as a medical doctor. (For good measure, he later got a Masters degree in Western Classical music at CalArts and a PhD. for his thesis on Raga Harmony from Jain University, Bangalore.)

Fulfilling his father’s dream, “which was to bring the violin to the world stages,” Dr. Subramaniam seemed to cross musical borders from the beginning of his music career. He brought the Carnatic tradition of South India to Western Classical music, most notably as a soloist and composer for orchestras around the world, including the New York Philharmonic Orchestra (with a piece commissioned by Maestro Zubin Mehta), the Houston Symphony, and the Berlin State Opera.

“The idea here is not to make an orchestra play Indian music,” Dr. Subramaniam once explained. “But to create something where both Western and Indian musicians feel like they’re playing their own music while creating something unique. With this context, we combine elements of Carnatic music with parts of Western classical music, like harmony and counterpoint, to build something entirely original.”

He has written music for films, including Salaam Bombay!, Mississippi Masala, and Little Buddha, and ballet, including the Kirov Ballet and the Alvin Ailey Company. He also collaborated with Western jazz and pop musicians (including the late Beatle George Harrison, jazz pianist Herbie Hancock, and singer-songwriter Stevie Wonder), performed jugalbandis (classical music duets) with North Indian musicians, and explored global music fusion.

Backed by a seven-piece band comprising Indian and Western instruments, anchored by tabla player Tanmoy Bose, in Bollywood & Beyond Kavita Krishnamurti and Dr. Subramaniam will offer a program that will blend different types and genres of music, including Kavita’s Bollywood hits, Dr. Subramaniam’s original compositions based on Indian ragas and performed with Indian and Western instruments, and fusion-based duets. Bollywood & Beyond is a rare

opportunity to explore Indian music, from classical tradition to film music to global fusion, with two of its greatest stars.

‘Indian 2’ Reveals New Facets Of Kamal’s Milestone Films

On the eve of Kamal Haasan’s much-anticipated appearance in Shankar’s ‘Indian 2’, which follows the mega star delivering successive blockbuster hits — ‘Kalki 2898 AD’ this year and crime thriller ‘Vikram’ in 2022 — Audible has announced the release of a new audiobook titled ‘Kamal Haasan: A Cinematic Journey’.

Director-turned-educationist K. Hariharan explores Kamal Haasan’s evolution across 50-plus films, showcasing his ability to challenge stereotypes and push boundaries. Here are some lesser-known facts from the screen legend’s incredible journey from the audiobook:

  1. When veteran producer L.V. Prasad screened ‘Ek Duje Ke Liye’ for the first time, it was a disaster.

Kamal Haasan bridged the north-south divide in India and made inroads into the Hindi film industry with ‘Ek Duuje Ke Liye’ (1981), which was what we would now call a pan-India film. Despite the initial setbacks and sceptical distributors in Mumbai, the film eventually was greeted with packed cinemas and emotional reactions.

The audience response took the veteran producer L.V. Prasad by complete surprise. In the words of Hariharan, “Prasad realised that everyone had seen a wholesome tragedy after a long time on the Hindi screen and there was no difference in feelings between the Tamil and Hindi audiences … he immediately called his son to order another 40 prints to be released all over India the following Friday.”

The film went on to celebrate 50 weeks in the theatres (a golden jubilee in the terminology that was current then) and the rest is history.

  1. Shah Rukh Khan did not charge a paisa for his role in ‘Hey Ram’.

Kamal Haasan’s journey with ‘Hey Ram’ (2000) began with an idea akin to a crime thriller, but he soon realized that empathizing with Gandhi’s assassin, Nathuram Godse, would be too reactionary.

“I changed it around completely and made the story get some respect for the protagonist. Undoubtedly, the film got me a lot of respect, but it flopped,” Kamal Haasan tells Hariharan. Shah Rukh Khan, however, “was so impressed by the vision of the film that he refused to charge a penny for his performance as Amjad, instead deeming it an honour to get an opportunity to work with a legend like Kamal.”

  1. Silent comedy ‘Pushpak’ was certified by the Censor Board multiple times in the same year in all Indian languages.

Inspired by the legacy of Charlie Chaplin, Kamal Haasan’s ‘Pushpak’ (1987) redefined silent comedy for Indian audiences. In the audiobook, Hariharan shares that the film’s release strategy was quite complex because of the absence of dialogue.

“The rule says that a talkie has to be in a certain language,” explains Hariharan. “In order to release this wordless film all over India, it was certified the same year by the Censor Board multiple times, in all Indian languages, with titles being changed and new censor certificates issued in all languages!”

  1. ‘Sathya’ almost got shelved because of Kamal Haasan’s financial difficulties.

The 1988 movie ‘Sathya’ was a bold move as it was the remake of the 1985 Bollywood hit ‘Arjun’, scripted by Javed Akhtar. Suresh Krishnaa was the director of the Tamil film and Kamal’s production house was helming the project. Kamal demonstrated his remarkable acting prowess, says Hariharan, but the film’s production faced a number of challenges.

“Kamal’s second production, a big-budget sci-fi venture titled ‘Vikram’ suffered on both critical and commercial fronts. His company had to comfort the distributors who had shouldered the risk of such an ambitious film,” writes Hariharan. But the film did well on all counts. With a stellar musical score by Ilaiyaraaja and Kamal’s relentless dedication, ‘Sathya’ became a defining film resonating deeply with audiences. (IANS)

India To Make Strides In Quantum Technology, AI With The US: Indian Minister

India is set to make great strides in quantum technology, artificial intelligence, critical metals and semiconductor sectors with the United States, Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Science and Technology, Dr Jitendra Singh, has told a visiting delegation of the US-India Business Council (USIBC).

The delegation led by Edward Knight, Executive Vice Chairman called on the Union Minister and discussed collaboration in different areas, according to the Ministry of Science and Technology.

The minister recalled PM Modi’s recent visit to the US and highlighted the joint statement on the deployment of greenfield renewable energy, battery storage and emerging green technology projects in India.

Dr Singh emphasised on the government’s vision in AI and Machine learning and expressed optimism over its integration with the AI task force developed by USIBC.

“Large Language Models (LLMs) are being worked upon by the Department of Science and Technology which are aligned with the task force,” the minister informed.

India is now a frontline nation in next-generation technologies.

He also informed the delegation about the ‘Anusandhan NRF’ on the similar lines of the National Research Foundation in the US.

Highlighting India’s progress in the last decade in science and technology, the minister recalled that the biotech industry has reached $140 billion with more than 4,000 companies.

NISAR — a joint mission between NASA and ISRO — is also evidence of India’s prowess in the space sector. He also referred to the new space policy and its benefits reaped in recent months.

Knight appreciated India’s model of ‘JAM’ (Jan Dhan Yojana, Aadhaar and mobile) trinity and direct benefit transfer (DBT), and invited the Minister for the ‘49th India Ideas Summit 2024’. (IANS)

India Can Be World’s 2nd Largest Economy By 2031: RBI Deputy Governor

Given the country’s innate strengths, it is possible to imagine India striking out into the next decade to become the second largest economy in the world not by 2048, but by 2031, and the largest economy of the world by 2060, said Michael Debabrata Patra, Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) during a program at the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration, Mussoorie.

“It is possible to imagine India striking out into the next decade to become the second largest economy in the world not by 2048, but by 2031 and the largest economy of the world by 2060,” said Mr Patra.

The deputy governor stated during an event of the Mid-Career Training Programme for officials of the Indian Administrative Service on July 9, at the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration.

He also called India’s journey in economic development an eventful and arduous one and added that during the last financial year 2023-24, India became a USD 3.6 trillion-dollar economy.

“India had become a ₹ 295.4 lakh crore or USD 3.6 trillion dollars’ economy at current exchange rates. At a per capita income of ₹ 2,07,030 or USD 2,500, India belongs in the lower middle-income group of countries. Reaching here has been an eventful and arduous journey, marked by what statisticians call ‘structural breaks” said Mr Patra.

The deputy governor also added that if India wants to become a developed economy it will have to grow at a rate of 9.6 per cent per annum for the next ten years.

“If India can grow at the rate of 9.6 per cent per annum over the next ten years, it will break free of the shackles of the lower middle-income trap and become a developed economy,” he said.

“Historically, India’s investment has been financed by domestic savings, with households being the prime provider of resources to the rest of the economy. In the period 2021-23, the gross domestic saving rate has averaged 30.7 per cent of gross national disposable income. Thus, unlike many countries, India does not have to depend on foreign resources, which play a minor and supplemental role in the growth process,” he added.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) projects that in PPP (purchasing power parity) terms, India will overtake the US by 2048 to become the second-largest economy in the world.

For rising inflation in the Indian economy, the deputy governor stated that RBI is committed to aligning inflation with the target and the inflation will ease to 4.1 per cent in 2025-26.

“RBI has anchored expectations by remaining committed to aligning inflation with the target and regards the recent easing of price pressures as work in progress. It projects inflation to average 4.5 per cent in 2024-25 and 4.1 per cent in 2025-26. The taming of inflation lays the foundations of sustained high growth in the future” said the deputy governor.

He also shared that the Gross non-performing assets (GNPAs) in the banking system have steadily fallen from their peak in March 2018 to 2.8 per cent of total assets by March 2024. The adjusted for provisions, net NPAs are just 0.6 per cent. The capital and liquidity buffers of the country are well above the regulatory norms.

The current account gap in the balance of payments – has remained modest at around 1 per cent of GDP in 2023-24. This provides insulation to the Indian economy from external shocks and imparts viability and strength to the external sector. Illustratively, India’s gross external debt, which is the accumulation of current account deficits over time, is less than 20 per cent of GDP and almost entirely covered by the level of foreign exchange reserves, Patra explained.

Second, the rising growth trajectory on which India is poised is entrenched by macroeconomic and financial stability as inflation has fallen back into the tolerance band around the target of 4 per cent. This reflects the cumulative impact of steadfast monetary policy actions and supply management. In fact, core inflation that excludes food and fuel and is most amenable to monetary policy has fallen to its lowest level ever.

Alongside macroeconomic stability, financial stability is getting reinforced by prudent financial policies and active on-site supervision complemented with off-site surveillance, which harnesses SupTech, big data analytics and cyber security drills. India’s financial sector is predominantly bank-based. Gross non-performing assets (GNPAs) in the banking system have steadily fallen from their peak in March 2018 to 2.8 per cent of total assets by March 2024, he added.

Patra pointed out that another growth multiplier is India’s digital revolution. India is emerging as a world leader in leveraging digital technologies for transformative change. The trinity of JAM – Jan Dhan (basic no-frills accounts); Aadhaar (universal unique identification); and mobile phone connections – is expanding the ambit of formal finance, boosting tech start-ups and enabling the targeting of direct benefit transfers. India’s Unified Payment Interface (UPI), an open-ended system that powers multiple bank accounts into a single mobile application is propelling inter-bank peer-to-peer and person-to-merchant transactions seamlessly. Payment systems in India operate on a 24 by 7 by 365 basis. The internationalisation of the UPI is progressing rapidly, the RBI deputy Governor added.

Global Population to Reach 9.7 Billion by 2050 as World’s Smallest Nations Face Unique Demographic Challenges

The global population is expected to continue growing steadily, projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050 and potentially peaking at nearly 10.4 billion in the mid-2080s, according to the United Nations. This forecasted increase represents a rise of almost 2 billion people within the next 30 years.

In 2023, India, with an estimated population of 1.4286 billion, slightly surpassed China to become the world’s most populous country, as noted in the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) State of the World Population Report. Experts attribute this growth to “population momentum” from previous decades and predict that India’s population will likely begin to decline around 2050. This trend is also expected to apply to the global population, which currently stands slightly above 8 billion.

Recognizing the importance of understanding population dynamics, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) observes World Population Day annually on July 11th. In 2024, the theme will be “Investing in data collection is important to understanding problems, tailoring solutions, and driving progress.”

While India and China are the most populous countries, each with over 1 billion people, there are countries with significantly smaller populations. For example, Vatican City is the least populated country globally due to various factors including its limited land area, geographical isolation, resource constraints, cultural preservation efforts, political status, and historical factors.

The world’s top 10 least-populated countries as of 2024 are:

  1. Vatican City

With a population of just 764, Vatican City is the smallest internationally recognized independent state. This is due to its tiny land area of just 49 hectares, strict citizenship requirements that limit new residents, and its unique status as the spiritual and administrative center of the Catholic Church rather than a typical country.

  1. Tokelau

A group of three remote atolls in the South Pacific, Tokelau’s isolated location and limited land area of just 26 square kilometers naturally constrain its population, which numbers around 1,915 people. The lack of airports and accessibility only by boat from Samoa further contribute to Tokelau’s small population.

  1. Niue

This self-governing island country, in free association with New Zealand, has a tiny land area of just 260 square kilometers. Its remote Pacific location and lack of major economic opportunities limit population growth, with the country home to about 1,935 people.

  1. Falkland Islands

As a British Overseas Territory in the South Atlantic, the Falkland Islands’ isolated position and harsh sub-Antarctic climate make it an unattractive destination for large-scale settlement. With a population closer to 3,500, the islands’ economy is heavily dependent on fishing and tourism.

  1. Montserrat

This Caribbean island nation has a small population of an estimated 4,372 people, largely due to a devastating volcanic eruption in the 1990s that destroyed much of the island and forced many residents to flee. The country’s limited land area and ongoing volcanic activity continue to constrain population growth.

  1. Saint Pierre and Miquelon

This French territorial collectivity in the North Atlantic has a population of around 5,815 people. Its remote location off the coast of Canada and lack of economic opportunities beyond fishing and tourism contribute to its small population size.

  1. Saint Barthélemy

As a French overseas collectivity in the Caribbean, Saint Barthélemy’s tiny land area of just 25 square kilometers and focus on luxury tourism rather than large-scale industry or agriculture limit its population, which stands approximately at 11,019.

  1. Wallis and Futuna

This French overseas territory in the South Pacific consists of three small volcanic islands with a total land area of just 142 square kilometers. Its remote location and lack of major economic activities result in a population closer to 11,439 people.

  1. Tuvalu

This Pacific island nation, comprising nine small atolls, has a population of merely 11,478 people. Its tiny land area of 26 square kilometers and isolation from major trade routes and economic centers contribute to its status as one of the least populated countries in the world.

  1. Nauru

As the world’s smallest republic, Nauru’s total land area of just 21 square kilometers and its remote location in Micronesia limits its population to roughly 12,884 people. The country’s economic challenges and lack of natural resources also hinder population growth.

Understanding population dynamics is essential for planning and resource allocation. Smaller populations face unique challenges and opportunities, often influenced by geographical, economic, and political factors. As the world’s population continues to grow, the experiences of both the most and least populated countries provide valuable insights into global demographic trends and their implications.

Air India Launches Real-Time Baggage Tracking Feature for Passengers

Air India has rolled out a new feature that allows passengers to track their baggage in real-time via its website and mobile application. This initiative comes in response to numerous complaints about lost and delayed baggage in recent times. As part of the Tata Group, the airline now stands among a select few globally that offer this level of convenience directly to passengers without requiring any intervention from airline staff.

The new tracking system provides passengers with current location updates and arrival details about their baggage.

According to the airline’s release, “The status coverage includes all important baggage touch points where baggage tracking technology is available such as check-in, security clearance, aircraft loading, transfers, and arrival in the baggage claim area.” This comprehensive tracking aims to enhance the overall travel experience by keeping passengers informed about their baggage throughout their journey.

Paris Summer Olympics Face Political Turmoil, Environmental Concerns, and Controversial Athlete Accommodations

The Paris Summer Olympics are rapidly approaching, with athletes worldwide gearing up for the competition. However, the Games face several issues, including political instability in France and complaints about the accommodations provided to the athletes.

KEY FACTS

Political Turmoil:The political scene in France is unstable, casting doubt on who will hold key government positions when the Games begin. The recent election resulted in a hung parliament, with the French left-wing New Popular Front party winning the most seats but not securing a majority. This has led to violent protests and clashes with the police.

River Seine Contamination:Some swimming events, such as triathlons and marathons, may be postponed, canceled, or relocated due to high levels of E. coli in the River Seine. Despite a $1.5 billion investment in cleaning the river, officials are concerned about the safety of the water.

River Seine “Poop Protest”:A viral protest planned to highlight the Seine’s contamination coincided with President Emmanuel Macron and Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo’s scheduled swim in the river to demonstrate its safety. This protest, originally an internet joke, was set for June 23 but may not have happened due to the elections delaying the officials’ swim.

No AC in the Olympic Village: To reduce the city’s carbon footprint, the athletes’ living quarters will not have air conditioning. This decision has prompted countries like the U.S., Great Britain, Australia, Italy, Canada, Greece, and Denmark to bring their own units to protect their athletes from potential heat waves.

“Anti-sex” Bed Rumors: The Olympic Village will feature twin beds made of cardboard frames and recycled fishing net mattresses. Some media outlets and former athletes claimed these beds were designed to collapse under the weight of more than one person, discouraging sexual activity. However, organizers denied this, explaining that the beds are recyclable to minimize environmental impact.

HOW CAN YOU WATCH THE OLYMPICS?

NBC is the primary U.S. broadcaster for the Games, offering at least nine hours of live daily coverage. Events will also be broadcast on NBC’s sister stations CNBC, Telemundo, USA, and NBCSN. Peacock, NBC’s streaming service, will provide live coverage of all events. The Opening Ceremony on July 26 will be broadcast live at 12 p.m. EDT on NBC and Peacock, with a Spanish broadcast on Telemundo starting at 1 p.m. EDT.

HOW MANY ATHLETES WILL COMPETE IN THE OLYMPICS?

Approximately 10,500 athletes from 206 countries will compete in 45 different sports, vying for medals in 329 events. This is the second-highest number of Olympic events, following the 2020 Tokyo Summer Olympics, which featured 339 events.

SURPRISING FACT

This isn’t the first time Olympic organizers have faced criticism for using cardboard bed frames. The Tokyo Olympics also utilized cardboard beds, leading to similar claims that they were meant to discourage sexual activity. These rumors were partly fueled by the Olympics’ COVID-era “anti-intimacy” rules. The beds, announced in January 2020 before the pandemic, were designed to be recyclable after the Games.

WHY IS THE OLYMPIC VILLAGE ECO-FRIENDLY?

Sustainability is a key element of Olympic Agenda 2020, a set of recommendations for the future of the Olympics. This agenda encourages host cities to adopt eco-friendly practices, reduce travel impact, and include sustainability in their daily operations. Paris Olympics officials have emphasized that the Olympic Village is designed to be transformed into a neighborhood for locals post-Games. Spread across three cities, the village will be converted into housing and office spaces for 6,000 residents and 6,000 workers by 2025. Organizers aim to cut greenhouse gas emissions by half compared to previous Summer Games, aligning with the Paris Agreement’s goal to reduce local carbon emissions by 100% by 2050.

TANGENT

Olympian Simone Biles appeared to criticize her former teammate MyKayla Skinner after Skinner made negative comments about the 2024 U.S. gymnastics team in a since-deleted YouTube video. Skinner stated, “besides Simone, I feel like the talent and the depth just isn’t like what it used to be.” Biles, without naming Skinner, responded on Threads, saying, “not everyone needs a mic and a platform.” The 2024 U.S. gymnastics team includes Suni Lee, Jade Carey, Jordan Chiles, and Hezly Rivera

Obama and Pelosi Privately Question Biden’s 2024 Chances, Urged to Intervene by Anxious

Democrats

Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi have held private discussions about Joe Biden and the future of his 2024 campaign. Both the former president and the ex-speaker have voiced concerns over the increasing difficulty they foresee in Biden’s ability to defeat Donald Trump. However, neither has determined a clear course of action.

Democrats are eager to end the internal discord to focus on defeating Trump. They are urging either Obama or Pelosi to step in, given that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer lacks Biden’s trust and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries doesn’t have a strong enough relationship with Biden to effectively deliver the message.

CNN interviewed over a dozen members of Congress, operatives, and individuals close to both Obama and Pelosi. Many feel Biden’s candidacy is nearing its end, and it’s now a matter of how it unfolds, despite Thursday night’s news conference.

If Obama and Pelosi think otherwise, several leading Democrats argue they must clearly communicate this soon to prevent further damage, with less than four months until the election.

Pelosi’s colleagues hope she can resolve the turmoil that has plagued Democrats for the past two weeks. Many believe this can happen if she convinces Biden to withdraw. While Pelosi has spoken to Biden since the debate, she has indicated that she does not view Biden’s decision to stay in the race as final. Nonetheless, through an aide, she declined to comment further.

Obama’s silence over the past two weeks has left many leading Democrats feeling abandoned. After the debate, he posted on X, “Bad debate nights happen. Trust me, I know,” echoing this sentiment at a fundraiser for House Democrats. Obama’s reluctance to publicly address the situation has heightened the anxiety within the party.

Despite his public silence, Obama’s skepticism about Biden’s chances is widely known in Washington. When the history of this turbulent period in American politics is documented, Obama and Pelosi’s influence will be more evident, according to sources familiar with the matter. They have acted as guiding figures for a panicked party.

“They are watching and waiting for President Biden to reach a decision on his own,” a longtime Democrat close to them told CNN, under the condition of anonymity to avoid appearing disrespectful to Biden.

The Biden campaign declined to comment.

While acknowledging that Obama and Pelosi have discussed Biden, a spokesperson for Pelosi told CNN, “There is no member of Congress who would have any knowledge of any conversation that Speaker Pelosi would have with President Obama. Anyone who says they do is not speaking the truth.”

Obama has been receiving more calls than he’s making, according to those who have spoken to him. When he does talk to anxious Democratic donors and officials, he listens more than he speaks, carefully avoiding taking positions that might leak.

This approach was also evident in his call with Biden after the debate. While Biden suggested to others that Obama was supportive of him weathering the storm, others familiar with the call said Obama maintained his role as a “sounding board and private counselor.” He prodded and played devil’s advocate but did not take a position.

In recent conversations with Democrats, Obama has dismissed the idea that he could influence Biden’s decision even if he wanted to. This highlights their complicated, yet loyal, relationship. Their relationship has grown more complex since Obama left office and their weekly lunches at the White House ended. The two now speak far less frequently than their advisers often suggest.

If Obama were to try to steer Biden to step down, he is aware of how it might be perceived. Biden has previously written that he felt Obama was not encouraging when he considered entering the Democratic primaries after his son Beau’s death in 2015. Though Obama believed he was helping Biden focus on his grief and avoid a tough primary campaign against Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, Biden might view another such conversation differently.

“Biden would say, ‘Well, Mr. President, you already used that chip in 2015 and it got us Donald Trump,’” speculated a longtime 2020 campaign aide. “I think it would harden him more.”

Obama is also cautious about giving Trump any new material to use against him.

Historically, Obama has seen his role as unifying the party and validating its direction to skeptical members. So far, he has not committed to playing this role in the debate over Biden’s candidacy. “Well he’s known as no-drama Obama,” said Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, a Missouri Democrat. “So if there’s drama, then he’s the one to deal with it.”

Obama’s public restraint is seen by some close to him as a way to preserve his position if he needs to have a frank, difficult conversation with Biden.

“He is going to be all in for the Democratic ticket. No matter who our nominee is, he will be busting his a** helping to make sure that person wins in November,” said one person who speaks with Obama regularly.

Obama has supported Biden at fundraising events this year, including one in Los Angeles where George Clooney later expressed concerns about Biden’s performance.

Biden had traveled from Italy after several days of G-7 meetings, flying overnight across five time zones to attend the fundraiser, because campaign co-chair Jeffrey Katzenberg insisted on the Hollywood-themed event, and Clooney was only available on that day. Obama questioned the logic of such a grueling schedule for any presidential candidate.

“He was the same man we all witnessed at the debate,” Clooney wrote in an essay in The New York Times, urging Biden to step aside.

Clooney’s comments angered some Biden loyalists, who suspected Obama’s involvement. Though Obama was aware of the op-ed, he did not try to stop it, which some see as maintaining neutrality, while others view it as betrayal.

Obama spent more time with Biden backstage and on stage than Clooney did. Those present attributed Biden’s condition to jet lag. The infamous video of Obama leading Biden off stage was more about Obama wanting to leave.

An Obama aide declined to comment on whether Obama still believed Biden’s condition was due to jet lag.

Pelosi re-broke the dam when she appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and cast doubt on Biden’s candidacy. Privately, she advised colleagues to avoid embarrassing Biden during the NATO summit. Yet, her comments were taken as a green light by more Democrats to call for Biden to step aside.

Pelosi has known Biden for decades and has been one of his staunchest defenders. She has nothing to lose now that she’s no longer speaker.

“I think at this moment, if Biden ends up stepping down as the nominee, she will prove to be the most important Democratic leader,” said one House Democrat. “She’s the one in a situation like this, especially generationally, who has the credibility to weigh in on something that is so sensitive and important.”

Pelosi plans to return to San Francisco on Friday.

Frail Biden’s NATO Summit Dominates Amid Fears of Trump Return

At his final NATO Summit, President Joe Biden, facing political and physical frailty, presides over an alliance at its strongest point. This juxtaposition hasn’t gone unnoticed among NATO officials from multiple European nations, who express alarm at Biden’s apparent decline and worry about a potential replacement by a hostile Donald Trump in November.

NATO officials are saddened by Biden’s deteriorating situation and frustrated that it detracts from what was meant to be a celebratory summit. They are increasingly resigned to his potential defeat in November, fearing it could halt or reverse the alliance’s recent progress, jeopardizing Ukraine’s defense against Russia and the broader stability that has been a cornerstone of NATO since its inception during the Cold War.

“It’s a very weird feeling to be in Europe listening to the president of the United States, and you’re more stressed about whether he will go off script than being excited to listen to the leader of the free world,” a senior European diplomat said. “You’re worried if he knows which direction he’s going or whether he’s going to fall or what he’s going to forget or if he’ll say ‘North Korea’ when he meant ‘South Korea.’ It’s just a weird experience.”

As visiting leaders applauded Biden’s speech, they and their aides were acutely aware of the context. They noted the fallout from Biden’s poor debate performance on June 27, ongoing doubts among Democrats about his ability to defeat Trump, and the precariousness of his candidacy hinging on every word and step.

“He didn’t look good,” remarked a Washington-based diplomat from one of the European countries.

Biden’s solo press conference Thursday evening will be critical, both for him politically and for the alliance.

“We would prefer a more stable situation in the U.S.,” said an official granted anonymity.

The focus on Biden distracts from Trump and the implications of his potential return, which worries officials. Trump, who criticized NATO allies for not spending enough on defense and threatened to withdraw from the alliance, remains a significant concern.

“Everyone’s focusing on Biden’s appearance and less on Trump’s statements about NATO,” the senior European diplomat added. “He’s not that much younger.”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy referenced November’s presidential election as critical, urging NATO members to act with urgency and “not to wait for November.”

Ivo Daalder, a former U.S. ambassador to NATO under President Barack Obama, noted that NATO allies are accelerating defense spending in response to the war in Ukraine and the increasing likelihood of a Trump victory.

“NATO allies understand that the probability of a Trump administration has gone up dramatically since the debate,” Daalder said. “That’s just a reality people have to deal with, so that means more outreach to the Trump camp in the short term and more determination by European allies to get to a place where those countries are doing more things on their own.”

During the first working session of NATO’s 75th anniversary summit, heads of state offered remarks focused on alliance unity and support for Ukraine. However, many faced awkward questions about Biden’s weakened political position and the implications of his potential electoral loss.

“I’m not going to comment on this topic,” said Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis, walking off after a brief statement. Other leaders responded with platitudes about respecting America’s democratic process and expressed faith that NATO would endure even if Trump returns to office.

Alexander Stubb, president of Finland, lamented the “toxic” level of U.S. political polarization but expressed optimism that Washington will continue to need European allies even if Trump wins.

“Of course we’re looking at elections throughout the world, and the American elections are very important,” said Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo. “But let’s be extremely clear, it’s the American citizens who will make their choice and that is a choice we will respect.”

De Croo, who recently met with Biden, praised his speech before NATO leaders but avoided commenting on Biden’s shaky debate performance.

“It’s incredibly awkward for our allies to get asked these questions about Biden’s mental acuity,” said Brett Bruen, a former State Department official under Obama. “They have their prepared pivot points, but it isn’t easy.”

The NATO summit, ending Thursday, provided a distraction for Biden as he faces growing Democratic resistance to his reelection bid. Despite limited time for outreach to lawmakers and donors, his role on the world stage aimed to assuage doubts and remind political allies of the importance of experience and shared values.

His forceful opening speech emphasized NATO’s commitment to Ukraine and was well-received by lawmakers and pundits.

“Everyone was watching with bated breath as he took the stage,” said Rachel Rizzo, a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Europe Center. “He successfully quelled concerns because he came across as forceful and presidential. But his age and his ability to do this job for another four years are certainly questions European leaders are still asking themselves.”

Biden’s aides recognize the critical importance of avoiding public stumbles, particularly during Thursday’s news conference. Even so, the growing chorus of supporters urging him to end his campaign might prove insurmountable.

As Biden greeted 31 leaders and posed for photos, foreign diplomats closely monitored his movements and tone, waiting to see the version of the president they saw in the first debate.

Several leaders have addressed the possibility of Trump’s return, noting that 23 of 32 member nations have met or exceeded the defense spending goal, a major issue for Trump.

Denmark’s foreign minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, recalled Trump’s criticism of NATO spending levels in 2018, suggesting that the notion of “Trump-proofing” the alliance should be seen as “future-proofing.”

“We have to understand it is in our own best interests to spend more…and that will give us an upper hand toward anyone in the White House,” Rasmussen said.

However, the focus on Biden may overshadow the broader message NATO leaders want to convey to the American public during this summit on U.S. soil.

“The Americans need to hear from us all that the problem is not Ukraine,” said Latvian Foreign Minister Baiba Braže. “The problem is Russia.”

An anonymous official from a NATO country expressed concern that the summit’s substantive actions might not resonate with a U.S. audience.

“All the Americans are looking for at this summit is the photo op of Biden with allies,” the official said. “We’re really concerned that the world will essentially be leaderless for the next several months, and then we don’t know what comes after that.”

The prospect of Trump leading NATO’s most indispensable member country again creates deep anxiety among officials and heads of state, despite confident statements about maintaining recent momentum.

“I am hoping, praying for, expecting the transatlantic alliance will be strong and alive also in the coming years,” Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said. “Hopefully, no matter what happens in the U.S., that will be the case.”

Many officials now believe Biden will not be reelected if he remains in the race. Estonia’s defense minister, Hanno Pevkur, addressed the uncertainty of future U.S. support for Ukraine, speaking of Trump’s return as a foregone conclusion.

“I would like to see what the new administration will do,” Pevkur said. “What happens in January when the new president takes office?”

Citigroup Hit with $135.6 Million Fine for Failing to Resolve Longstanding Risk Issues, CEO Fraser Vows Continued Transformation

Citigroup was fined $135.6 million by government regulators on Wednesday for not making enough progress in addressing longstanding internal control and risk issues. This decision is a significant setback for Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser, who has been focused on making the bank more efficient and less complicated.

The Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) imposed the fines, stating in separate releases that Citigroup had not fulfilled its obligations from a 2020 consent order related to its risk and control issues. While acknowledging some progress, the regulators emphasized that major problems still persist, necessitating further penalties from the OCC and Fed.

Acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael J. Hsu emphasized the need for Citigroup to complete its transformation and promptly address its longstanding deficiencies. “Citibank must see through its transformation and fully address in a timely manner its longstanding deficiencies,” Hsu stated.

This $135.6 million fine adds to the $400 million penalty Citigroup paid in 2020 when the original consent order was signed. As part of the new penalties, Citigroup will pay $61 million to the Federal Reserve and $75 million to the OCC.

Fraser acknowledged in a statement that the bank has not progressed as quickly as necessary but affirmed her commitment to making Citigroup less risky. “We’ve always said that progress wouldn’t be linear, and we have no doubt that we will be successful in getting our firm where it needs to be in terms of our transformation,” she said.

Following the 2008 financial crisis, Citigroup was seen as a prime example of a “too big to fail” institution. The near-collapse and subsequent government bailout forced Citigroup executives to downsize the bank’s extensive balance sheet, divest unnecessary businesses, and exit financial markets where it couldn’t maintain a dominant position.

In the 1990s and early 2000s, Citigroup expanded rapidly through acquisitions and mergers, aiming to become a financial conglomerate serving every customer need. However, many acquired businesses had software and internal controls incompatible with other parts of Citigroup. Despite being less complex than in 2008, Citigroup still faces significant regulatory concerns due to these internal communication issues.

Banking regulators rejected Citigroup’s “living will” in June, a document intended to outline how the bank could be wound down safely and orderly in case of failure.

Fraser has committed her tenure as CEO to improving Citigroup’s internal controls, a task requiring thousands of employees, billions of dollars, and several years of effort. Some of her initiatives have been successful, such as selling parts of Citigroup’s consumer banking business, notably the planned spin-off of Citi’s Banamex operations in Mexico.

Poll Reveals Biden’s Tenuous Lead Against Trump, Clinton and Harris Emerge as Strong Contenders

A new survey from a leading Democratic pollster shows President Joe Biden still in the running against Donald Trump, but facing increased risk of losing the election, while other top Democrats are gaining traction.

The national poll, conducted by Bendixen & Amandi following Biden’s problematic debate and shared exclusively with POLITICO, reveals Biden trailing Trump, 42 percent to 43 percent.

Among the 86 percent of likely voters who watched the debate, only 29 percent believe Biden has the mental capacity and physical stamina to serve another term, compared to 61 percent who do not. Additionally, only 33 percent feel he should remain the Democratic nominee, while 52 percent think he should step aside. Even among Democrats, just half support Biden continuing as the nominee or believe he is fit to serve another term.

Vice President Kamala Harris is now slightly ahead of Trump, 42 percent to 41 percent, according to the survey. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, despite not being a serious candidate, is ahead of Harris and leads Trump 43 percent to 41 percent.

The poll also examined other potential Democratic tickets and found a Clinton-Harris combination in the strongest position, beating Trump 43 percent to 40 percent, a four-point advantage over Biden-Harris.

Fernand Amandi, a veteran Miami-based pollster whose firm advised former President Barack Obama and conducted this poll, noted that more than one-third of Democrats do not view Biden as fit to run and think he should not continue. “Voters have significant concerns about President Biden’s advanced age, and their concerns have only grown louder,” he said. “But [they are] still not enough where it has made the race a blowout for Trump.”

Amandi expressed surprise at Hillary Clinton’s strength in the poll. “I’m really surprised by Hillary’s strength,” he said. “While some dismiss her as yesterday’s news and a candidate of the past, voters at least in this poll suggest they may be open to a Clinton comeback and that a ticket with Clinton as president and Harris as vice president is even ‘stronger together’,” referring to Clinton’s 2016 campaign slogan.

The poll also included other leading Democrats who might run if Biden steps aside, though they trailed both Harris and Trump. California Gov. Gavin Newsom lags behind Trump, 37 percent to 40 percent, and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is slightly further behind Trump at 36 percent to 40 percent.

The survey of 1,000 likely voters, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percent, was conducted by phone and email between July 2 and July 6. This comes as more Democratic officials, donors, and activists increase pressure on Biden to exit the race following his June 27 debate debacle.

Anthony Williams, special projects director at Bendixen & Amandi, noted that the openness to someone like Clinton shows a desire for a candidate tested on the international stage. “There’s a certain sophistication at play in the way voters are reacting. They are not knee-jerk reacting to the names that are being bandied about on television,” Williams said. “They are struggling with the same question the party is struggling with: Do we go with experience, or do we go with new? And I think, given everything going on with the world right now, if they can find someone with experience, that would help them sleep a little better.”

“We’re talking about relatively small differences — but important differences in a race that could come down to a couple points,” Williams added. “It’s almost as if [Clinton] finishes out Biden’s term in the experience lane.”

A Democratic ticket led by Harris with Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro as her running mate also did well, beating Trump by two percentage points, 42 percent to 40 percent. However, a Harris-Whitmer ticket is 2 points behind Trump, 39 to 41 percent.

Clinton, who at 76 is younger than both Trump and Biden, has publicly vowed not to run for president again and has reaffirmed her support for Biden after his Atlanta debate disaster. Shapiro, 51, took office last year after serving as attorney general and is a popular politician in his battleground state. Newsom and Whitmer are in their final terms and have been raising funds and campaigning for Biden.

Despite calls to step aside, Biden has pledged to keep running. He and White House officials pointed to his busy travel schedule before the debate and his bad cold as reasons for his poor performance. They stated that he has not had a cognitive examination and there is no reason for one.

The poll included a provocative question about whether voters would support Biden if he were cognitively diminished due to age and unlikely to complete another four years if it meant preventing Trump from winning. Forty-eight percent of voters said they would not support Biden for that reason, while 44 percent said they would, including 75 percent of Democrats. The strongest support for Biden came from Black voters, with 55 percent willing to back him even if he suffered age-related impairment and couldn’t complete the term.

Amandi noted that these answers show the floor of likely voters nationally who, despite reservations about Biden’s age and ability, would not let that stop them from opposing Trump, whom a majority see as a major threat.

In the poll, 53 percent of respondents viewed Trump becoming president as a grave danger to democracy in the U.S., while 37 percent dismissed it as partisan rhetoric.

“The debate exposed damage to both candidates — because one would have expected, in the aftermath of what the president himself described as a disastrous debate, for Trump to be opening up a significant lead,” Amandi said. “We’re not seeing that. And the backstop for that is voters having legitimate concerns about what Trump winning the presidency would mean for the future of the country and the democracy.”

Forty-eight percent of likely voters disagreed with the Supreme Court’s recent decision that Trump has immunity from criminal prosecutions for actions he took as president to subvert the 2020 election, while 40 percent agreed.

Amandi commissioned and conducted the poll to understand where likely voters stood after the June 27 debate — whether they would stick with Biden despite his struggles, and, if not, who else might be a viable alternative against Trump just three months before some states begin early voting.

“The debate has reset the race from the perspective of what it means if Biden continues on or if we go down an unprecedented and uncharted path of making a nominee switch because he decides to step aside,” he said. “Are there alternatives that would be competitive with Trump? The answer is there are two: Clinton and Harris, who have a small but significant lead.”

Democratic Concerns Grow as Biden Clings to Nomination Amidst Calls to Step Aside

On a pivotal day in Washington, President Joe Biden held onto the Democratic nomination, though concerns about his decision to stay in the race were starkly highlighted. One of his party’s senators warned on CNN that Donald Trump could win in a “landslide,” underlining the risks involved in Biden’s refusal to step aside.

Biden’s determination has left Democrats increasingly worried that the president could jeopardize not only the White House but also their chances of retaking the House or retaining the Senate—challenges already seen as uphill battles.

The White House managed to quell rebellions in emotional meetings with Senate and House Democrats on Tuesday. However, even some of Biden’s supporters expressed doubts about his strategies and his ability to run a successful campaign. Uncertainty about Biden’s future grew on Wednesday with comments from former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and actor George Clooney, who urged Biden to step aside.

Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado was among three Democrats who privately expressed concerns about Biden’s chances of winning in November, sources told CNN’s Dana Bash. Bennet later publicly voiced his fears. “Donald Trump is on track, I think, to win this election and maybe win it by a landslide and take with him the Senate and the House,” Bennet said on CNN. “So for me, this isn’t a question about polling. It’s not a question about politics. It’s a moral question about the future of our country.”

“The White House, in the time since that disastrous debate, I think, has done nothing to really demonstrate that they have a plan to win this election,” he added.

While Bennet’s comments do not reflect the public stance of all Democratic senators, the debate and its aftermath have undeniably stirred deep concerns within the party.

Pelosi alluded to this anxiety during an MSNBC appearance, suggesting that Biden’s place on the Democratic ticket was still in question despite his firm stance. “It’s up to the president to decide if he is going to run. We’re all encouraging him to make that decision because time is running short,” she said. “I want him to do whatever he decides to do and that’s the way it is.”

In a striking op-ed in The New York Times, Clooney criticized Biden after attending a fundraiser with him last month. “It’s devastating to say it, but the Joe Biden I was with three weeks ago at the fundraiser was not the Joe ‘big F-ing deal’ Biden of 2010. He wasn’t even the Joe Biden of 2020. He was the same man we all witnessed at the debate,” Clooney wrote. “We are not going to win in November with this president,” he warned, noting that lawmakers he spoke with privately shared this view.

The last two weeks have significantly weakened Biden’s standing within a party already lukewarm about his campaign. His recent missteps threaten to narrow an already fragile path to reelection against a revitalized Trump, who held a fiery rally in Florida on Tuesday, nine days before he’s set to accept the Republican nomination.

Deep unease over Biden’s prospects permeated through Democratic senators and representatives in Washington on Tuesday, with venting sessions taking place behind closed doors. Despite growing calls for him to step aside, Biden managed to maintain his grip on the nomination with support from Senate and House leaders, albeit lukewarm.

In a letter to lawmakers on Monday, Biden reaffirmed his commitment to the race: “I am firmly committed to staying in this race.” This, coupled with the primary voters’ decisions, left his critics with little room to maneuver. Pelosi, however, hinted that the matter was still open. “Just hold off, whatever you’re thinking, either tell somebody privately but you don’t have to put that out on the table until we see how we go this week,” she advised Democrats. After her comments circulated widely, a spokesperson clarified that Pelosi “fully supports whatever President Biden decides to do.”

Rep. Ritchie Torres provided a stark warning to CNN about the potential impact on other races if Biden continues his bid for reelection. “If we are going on a political suicide mission, then we should at least be honest about it,” he said, adding, “There must be a serious reckoning with the down-ballot effect of whomever we nominate.”

Biden faces another critical test on Thursday with a solo press conference at the end of the NATO summit. Any mistakes or confusion could further undermine Democratic support.

The crisis surrounding Biden’s campaign reflects the broader turmoil within the Democratic Party, which is grappling with concerns about his viability, strength, and mental capacity less than four months from Election Day. There is scant evidence that Biden is ready to engage in intensive campaign activities, which many Democrats believe are essential for a successful run. Some Democrats doubt his chances of winning in November, while the urgency of the situation is magnified by Trump’s strong political position.

Tuesday was seen as a crucial day for Biden, as it marked the first time lawmakers had gathered en masse since the debate and the July Fourth recess. Despite an increase in calls for him to step aside, Biden managed to stabilize his campaign’s crisis.

“We do want to turn the page. We want to get to the other side of this,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters, though the president’s political challenges as the oldest-ever president remain significant.

Biden delivered one of his strongest recent public appearances at the NATO summit in Washington on Tuesday, even as the effects of aging were evident in his speech and movements. “Remember, the biggest cost and the greatest risk will be if Russia wins in Ukraine. We cannot let that happen,” he said, praising NATO as “the single greatest, most effective defense alliance in the history of the world.”

The summit was intended to highlight Biden’s leadership as a key figure in the West since World War II and to contrast him with Trump, who often criticized America’s European allies. Instead, it has become a test of Biden’s mental acuity.

White House officials told CNN’s Kayla Tausche that Biden’s speech went according to plan and hoped it would allow him to resume “business as usual.” However, every public appearance by the president now feels like an excruciating wait for potential gaffes, awkward moments, or freezes. His debate performance left an unflattering impression on 50 million viewers, and it’s a low bar for a president to deliver a short, scripted speech without issues.

The situation is unlikely to improve over the next four months due to the inherent challenges of Biden’s matchup with Trump and his decision to run for a term that would end when he is 86.

Nevertheless, it’s too early to count Biden out. Voters decide elections, not lawmakers or media commentary. Biden has repeatedly defied predictions of his political demise and has shown resilience despite personal and political setbacks. Trump, a convicted criminal, has a knack for alienating moderate, suburban, and swing voters with his extreme rhetoric and threats.

The Republican National Convention in Milwaukee next week, which will likely turn into a MAGA festival, is seen by the Biden camp as an opportunity to highlight the contrast with Trump, which Biden’s debate performance had temporarily obscured.

Most post-debate national polls suggest Biden lost a couple of points to Trump, making an already close race tighter. However, there is little quality polling in swing states since the debate. Biden was generally trailing Trump in many battlegrounds before the debate and needed to reset the race, but instead, he created negative momentum.

Biden’s failure to frame a sharp contrast with Trump on key issues like abortion, taxes, character, and Trump’s threat to democracy and US values has fueled Democratic despair.

This disappointment was evident as lawmakers entered their meetings on Tuesday, with many avoiding reporters afterward. A source told CNN’s Bash that Sens. Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Jon Tester of Montana joined Bennet in expressing doubts about Biden’s chances.

“It’s true that I said that,” Bennet told CNN. “Donald Trump is on track, I think, to win this election and maybe win it by a landslide and take with him the Senate and the House.”

Sen. Angus King, an independent from Maine who caucuses with Democrats, said senators believe Biden must engage in unscripted situations to address voters’ questions. Asked about the risks of Biden stumbling, King replied: “It seems to me that’s a risk they have to take. If he’s OK, it shouldn’t be a problem.”

Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman defended Biden. “We concluded that Joe Biden is old; we found out, and the polling came back that he’s old,” Fetterman told CNN. “But we also agreed that he’s our guy.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, asked about Biden, responded tersely, “I’m with Joe,” indicating his support.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, who had privately doubted Biden’s candidacy, said he now supports him, though his decision seemed driven by the difficulty of replacing Biden rather than confidence in his strength. “I’m not resigned to it. He made very clear he’s going to run. He’s got an excellent record, one of the most excellent presidents of the last century. Trump would be an absolute disaster for democracy; so, I’m enthusiastically supporting Biden,” Nadler said.

The Congressional Black Caucus, a powerful House Democratic Caucus faction, has also bolstered Biden’s support. Many CBC members are in safe districts and may face less pressure than frontline Democrats critical of Biden’s debate performance. Texas Rep. Marc Veasey voiced concerns for vulnerable colleagues, criticizing Biden’s post-debate efforts. “Whatever I have seen so far hasn’t shown me that that’s going to be enough to get there. I just don’t think that dog is gonna hunt,” Veasey told CNN. “I think that he has a long way to go and I think there are stronger candidates that would be more likely to beat Trump at this point, but if he says that he is going to stay in, (then) he’s the nominee.”

Rep. Mikie Sherrill of New Jersey praised Biden’s presidency but became the seventh House Democrat to call for him to step aside. “Because I know President Biden cares deeply about the future of our country, I am asking that he declare that he won’t run for reelection and will help lead us through a process toward a new nominee.”

Some Democratic leaders sought to rally their members by attacking Trump. “Every single member of the House Democratic Caucus is clear-eyed about what the stakes of this election are,” said Rep. Pete Aguilar, the caucus chairman. “Donald Trump cannot be allowed near the Oval Office and his extremist allies must never be allowed to pass a national abortion ban or their dangerous Project 2025, which would erode our democracy and enable Trump’s worst impulses,” the California Democrat said. His forceful presentation underscored the missed opportunities Biden had in the debate.

In Las Vegas, Vice President Kamala Harris attacked Trump with the vigor of a former prosecutor. “I will say that someone who vilifies immigrants, who promotes xenophobia, someone who stokes hate should never again have the chance to stand behind a microphone and the seal of the President of the United States,” Harris said.

For Democrats who believe Harris would be a stronger nominee, her dynamic delivery highlighted an alternative path that Biden has closed off.

Denmark Tops List of Happiest Countries for Expats’ Work Lives, Survey Reveals

Expats in Denmark are reportedly among the happiest in their work lives, as revealed by the latest Expat Insider survey from InterNations, an online global community for expatriates. Denmark leads the list for job satisfaction, career opportunities, and work-life balance.

The survey collected responses from over 12,500 expatriates, reflecting their sentiments on four major categories related to work, including career prospects, salary and job security, work culture and satisfaction, and work and leisure. Denmark topped the rankings for work culture and satisfaction, as well as work and leisure.

A notable 84% of expats in Denmark expressed satisfaction with their work-life balance, compared to the global average of 60%. Similarly, a high percentage of expats are content with their work hours, averaging 39.2 hours per week versus the global average of 42.5 hours.

The top 10 countries where expats are happiest with their work lives abroad are as follows:

  1. Denmark
  2. Saudi Arabia
  3. Belgium
  4. Netherlands
  5. Luxembourg
  6. United Arab Emirates
  7. Australia
  8. Mexico
  9. Indonesia
  10. Austria

Ilana Buhl, a contributor to CNBC Make It and an American teacher who relocated to Denmark, highlights several positive changes she experienced after moving from Texas to Copenhagen. These changes include shorter workweeks, stronger boundaries around off-hours, five weeks of paid vacation, and a higher salary that aligns well with the lower cost of living. Beyond work, Buhl appreciates Denmark’s robust public transit, public healthcare, affordable daycare, and generous maternity leave funded by both her employer and the government. “Many of these factors contribute to the fact that Denmark consistently ranks as one of the happiest countries in the world,” Buhl notes, referencing the annual World Happiness Report.

Saudi Arabia ranks second, with 75% of expats reporting improved career prospects after moving there, compared to the global average of 56%. A majority of newcomers, 63%, relocate to Saudi Arabia for work, where they find satisfaction with the local economy. In contrast, only 35% of expats globally cite job-related reasons for their move. However, the long working hours in Saudi Arabia, averaging 47.8 hours per week, may be a downside.

Belgium completes the top three, with expats highly satisfied with job security, the local job market, and career opportunities. In Belgium, 68% of expats report enjoying workplace flexibility, including the ability to work remotely. The average full-time workweek in Belgium is 40.8 hours, shorter than the global average.

Panama is recognized as the No. 1 best country for expats overall according to the InterNations survey. This ranking considers broader life and financial factors, with expats expressing satisfaction with the quality of life, ease of settling in, working abroad, personal finances, and an “expat essentials” index that covers housing, administration, language, and digital life.

Denmark stands out as the top destination for expats seeking a fulfilling work life, with its strong work culture, satisfactory work-life balance, and numerous benefits outside of work. Saudi Arabia and Belgium also offer significant advantages for expatriates, despite some challenges like longer working hours in Saudi Arabia. Overall, these countries provide a supportive environment for career growth and job satisfaction.

Unlocking Happiness: Practical Strategies from Yale’s Science of Well-Being Course

Are you as happy as you should be? That question often keeps me up at night and fueled my interest in studying and writing about happiness. In my 20s, I realized that much of what we’re taught as kids doesn’t fully align with psychological wellbeing.

Sure, my parents and teachers said, “I want you to be happy.” But how often do they teach us how to be happy using credible science?

This curiosity led me to enroll in Yale’s 8-week happiness course, The Science of Well-Being, which is free and highly informative. Here are a few takeaways, how they connected with my life, and how they can impact yours.

The Basics

The course, taught by Yale Psychology professor Dr. Laurie Santos, focuses on flaws in our thinking and approach to happiness. A central concept is the GI Joe Fallacy, based on the kid’s TV show GI Joe, which ended with, “And now you know. And knowing is half the battle.”

According to Dr. Santos, “Merely knowing something isn’t enough to put it into practice. It’s not enough to change your behavior.” This insight resonates with my experience as a self-help writer. Many people consume self-help content as a pseudo act of self-improvement. It feels like progress to read about the importance of exercise or cold showers, but this knowledge is useless if not acted upon.

The same applies to writing courses I’ve taught. Many people enroll and participate but do little writing. While they may enjoy the process, it doesn’t help them achieve their goal of becoming writers. The same principle applies to happiness—understanding it requires action beyond mere knowledge.

The Misalignment of Expectations and Outcomes

When the professor polled the class on what they thought would make them happy, most answers—good grades, a good job, marriage, money—were wrong. Experiments showed that students given their dream internships were no happier months later than before.

Harvard Professor Dan Gilbert, in his book Stumbling Upon Happiness, found that people always thought a higher income would make them happy, yet each raise provided only temporary happiness. We constantly re-baseline our expectations, leading to a cycle of restlessness and acclimation, explaining many people’s lack of happiness.

Happiness Strategies

One effective strategy is savoring, which boosts wellbeing. Savoring involves reflecting on and appreciating past experiences. For my assignment, I took time daily to savor one experience. Often, these were small everyday activities.

One day, I savored showering after a hard workout, appreciating the feeling of being clean. Another day, I enjoyed a brief rainstorm while reading a book and reflected on how relaxing it was. By the third day, I noticed an improvement in my mood and overall disposition.

This practice can also be part of a daily gratitude journal, where you express thankfulness for small moments (mine takes only 60 seconds). Dr. Santos emphasizes feeling the gratitude as you think about it. You can also take photos of what you’re grateful for if that helps.

Invest in Temporal Things

Another key strategy from the course is investing in things that expire shortly after use, countering the instinct to acclimate to your environment.

Moreover, invest in experiences. Dr. Leaf Van Boven’s study found a negative correlation between spending on material objects and mental wellbeing. People overestimate the happiness these purchases bring. Conversely, spending on experiences positively correlates with mental wellbeing due to their potential for positive reinterpretation over time.

For example, my wife Laura and I take an annual trip with friends to Mexico. This provides satisfaction, a sense of reward, and an escape from routine. I can look back and appreciate the time spent with friends and new experiences. Conversely, while I enjoy buying a new car, it doesn’t significantly add to my happiness.

The Bronze Medal Problem

A striking fallacy relates to bronze medals. Researcher Dr. Victoria Medvec studied photos of Olympic medalists and found silver medalists had a more negative demeanor than bronze medalists, who were happier. This reflects our tendency to compare and dwell on “what could have been.”

As a swimmer, I got second place in the 50 free at my high school state championships, losing by .03 seconds. It bothered me for years. Yet, a year later, I got a bronze medal in the 100 free and was over the moon. These two outcomes are my best and worst athletic memories, illustrating our comparison problem.

A counterintuitive strategy to combat this is visualizing something important in your life not being there. This leads to greater satisfaction. For instance, I often forget that in that same high school meet, I beat the third place winner by only .05 seconds. I should have been grateful for the silver.

With your spouse, think about the chance encounter of meeting them and how easily it might not have happened. This exercise highlights the things we take for granted, reminding us that the people and luxuries around us were never guaranteed.

A Few Things Before You Go

The course was informative, emphasizing that we must check all the basic health boxes. Our bodies are complex chemical experiments. Without proper sleep, exercise, and nutrition, we throw these balances off.

In my experience, sleep impacts my happiness the most. A Norwegian study of college students found a clear link between quality sleep and life satisfaction.

I wish you all the happiness life can bring. Invest in these exercises, practice savoring, and appreciate mundane activities like showering or hearing kids laugh. Invest in experiences over material possessions; memories carry more value than shiny objects.

Recognize the GI Joe Fallacy—happiness takes work, not just knowledge. Make healthy comparisons and remember how easily the things and people you love could not be here. Don’t become the bitter silver medalist in life.

Unlocking True Happiness: Practical Strategies from Yale’s Renowned Happiness Course

Are You as Happy as You Should Be?

The question of whether we are as happy as we should be often keeps me awake at night. This curiosity led me to study and write about happiness. I realized in my 20s that much of what we learn as children doesn’t fully align with psychological well-being. While my parents and teachers expressed a desire for my happiness, they rarely provided credible scientific methods to achieve it.

To bridge this gap, I enrolled in Yale’s free 8-week happiness course, The Science of Well-Being, taught by Yale Psychology professor Dr. Laurie Santos. The course focuses on common flaws in our thinking and approach to happiness. A central concept in the course is the GI Joe Fallacy, developed by Dr. Santos. This fallacy, inspired by the children’s TV show GI Joe, highlights the erroneous belief that merely knowing something is enough to change behavior. Dr. Santos emphasizes, “Merely knowing something isn’t enough to put it into practice. It’s not enough to change your behavior.”

As a self-help writer, I’ve observed that many people consume self-help content as a substitute for actual self-improvement. They feel a sense of progress by reading about the importance of exercise or cold showers but fail to follow through. Similarly, many people take writing courses but do little writing. This behavior is fascinating and ultimately fine if they enjoy it. However, if their goal is to write or be happy, merely studying these topics won’t suffice. The course teaches that understanding happiness requires effort beyond mere comprehension.

When the professor polled the class about what they believed would make them happy, most students were wrong. They listed common goals such as good grades, a good job, marriage, and great money. However, experiments showed that achieving dream internships or other goals didn’t make students happier in the long run. Harvard Professor Dan Gilbert, in his book *Stumbling Upon Happiness*, found that people making $40,000 per year believed that earning $60,000 or $75,000 would make them happy, while those earning $75,000 thought $90,000 would suffice. Although each income increase brought temporary happiness, people quickly reverted to their previous state of satisfaction.

We continuously re-baseline our expectations, leading to a frustrating cycle of restlessness and acclimation, which hinders happiness. How do we counteract this?

Happiness Strategies

One effective strategy is savoring, which significantly boosts well-being. Savoring involves deliberately reflecting on and appreciating experiences after they occur. As part of my assignment, I practiced savoring daily, usually focusing on small, everyday activities. One day, I savored the feeling of being clean after a workout, which always rejuvenates me but often goes unappreciated. Another day, I reflected on the relaxation of reading a book during a rainstorm in Tampa. By the third day, I noticed an improvement in my mood and overall disposition.

This practice can also be incorporated into a daily gratitude journal, where you express thankfulness for small moments (mine takes only 60 seconds). Dr. Santos advises feeling the gratitude as you think about it. Taking photos of things you’re grateful for can also help.

Another key strategy is investing in temporal things, which expire shortly after use. This counters the instinct to acclimate to our environment. Investing in experiences rather than material objects also enhances mental well-being. Dr. Leaf Van Boven’s study found a negative correlation between spending on material objects and mental well-being, while spending on experiences positively correlated with happiness due to their potential for positive reinterpretation over time.

For instance, my wife Laura and I take an annual trip with friends Dan and Rick, usually to Mexico. This trip brings us satisfaction, a sense of reward, and an escape from routine. Reflecting on these experiences provides lasting happiness, unlike material purchases, which offer only temporary joy.

The Bronze Medal Problem

Another impactful concept is the bronze medal problem. Researcher Dr. Victoria Medvec studied photos of Olympic medalists and found that silver medalists often displayed more negative facial expressions than bronze medalists. Bronze medalists were generally happier because silver medalists focused on what they could have done to win gold, while bronze medalists were grateful to have made it to the podium.

As a former swimmer, I relate to this. In high school, I placed second in the 50 free at my state championships, losing by .03 seconds. It took years to get over it. However, a year later in college, I won a bronze medal in the 100 free and was thrilled. These outcomes represent my best and worst athletic memories, illustrating our tendency to compare and dwell on what could have been.

A counterintuitive strategy to combat this is visualizing important aspects of your life not being there. Research shows this exercise leads to greater satisfaction. For instance, I should remember that in the same high school meet where I placed second, I beat the third-place winner by only .05 seconds. Or, when thinking about my spouse, I should consider the chance encounter that led to our meeting and how fortunate that was.

This exercise highlights the importance of appreciating what we have. Beautiful, loving people and simple luxuries are never guaranteed.

Final Thoughts

The course was enlightening and reminded me to prioritize basic health needs. Our bodies are complex chemical experiments, and without proper sleep, exercise, and nutrition, we disrupt our chemical and hormonal balances. For me, sleep significantly impacts my happiness, acting as a supercharger for my mood and energy. A Norwegian study of college students found a clear link between quality sleep and life satisfaction.

I wish you all the happiness life can bring. Invest time in these exercises: practice savoring everyday activities, invest in experiences over material possessions, recognize the GI Joe Fallacy, and make healthy comparisons. Remember, happiness requires effort, not just knowledge. Don’t become the bitter silver medalist in life.

Unearthing English’s Lost Letter: The Fascinating History of Ampersand and Other Alphabet Anomalies

A recent TikTok video from @zachdfilms3 has brought to light a fascinating aspect of English language history: there was once a time when the alphabet consisted of 27 letters instead of the current 26. The video explains that the 27th letter was none other than “ampersand”, symbolized by “&”.

In his video, @zachdfilms3 elaborates, “This is an ampersand and believe it or not it used to be the 27th letter in the alphabet. You see, back in the day, this symbol came after the letter Z and signified the word ‘and’.” This revelation underscores a historical quirk that many might find surprising today.

Historical records and sources corroborate this discovery. According to The Mirror, students reciting the alphabet in earlier times were instructed to include the ampersand by saying “‘per se’ before it,” resulting in an alphabetical recitation that concluded with “Q R S T U V W X Y Z &. And ‘per se &’ ampersand.”

Encyclopedia Britannica adds further insight, noting that ampersand even found its way into nursery rhymes aimed at teaching children the alphabet: “X, Y, and ampersand / All wished for a piece in hand.” This whimsical inclusion highlights the cultural imprint of a letter that, despite its brief tenure in the English alphabet starting from 1835, eventually faded from mainstream use by the end of the 19th century.

The disappearance of ampersand from the alphabet reflects a broader trend in language evolution. English, like many languages, has shed and gained letters over the centuries. Notably, letters such as thorn (þ) and Wynn (ƿ) were once integral but have since been replaced or assimilated into modern letter forms. Ethel (Œ), once pronounced akin to the “oi” in “oil”, and Yogh (ȝ), used briefly for “ch” sounds, similarly fell out of favor as linguistic needs and conventions changed.

Despite these shifts, the question remains whether English will continue to lose letters in the future. Anne Babson, an English instructor at Southeastern Louisiana University, suggests that standardized spelling has stabilized the alphabet compared to the fluid transitions of Middle English into Modern English. Reflecting on potential future changes, Babson remarks, “Most of our high school English teachers would roll over in their graves if ‘quick’ became permanently ‘quik.’ That said, it’s not impossible that we will simplify the orthography of many words the way the ‘drive thru’ has done.”

This sentiment underscores the balancing act between preserving linguistic traditions and embracing linguistic efficiency. As Babson hints, while certain letters like “x” might seem underutilized in current English, their historical and phonetic roles still contribute to the language’s rich tapestry of sounds and meanings.

The story of ampersand and its brief tenure in the English alphabet serves as a reminder of language’s constant evolution. From nursery rhymes to linguistic curiosities, each letter and symbol carries a piece of history and cultural significance. Whether future changes simplify or enrich English orthography, the legacy of letters like ampersand endures, offering glimpses into the ever-changing landscape of language and communication.

Macron’s Gamble Leads to Uncertainty: French Election Results in Hung Parliament and Rising Far-Right Influence

On Sunday night, there was a sense of joy as French voters successfully kept the far right out of power. However, by Monday morning, the mood had shifted to uncertainty due to a hung parliament, fragile alliances, and the prospect of turbulent years ahead.

President Emmanuel Macron called for France’s snap parliamentary election to “clarify” the political situation. Yet, the shock second-round results left the political landscape more muddled than it had been in decades.

The left-wing New Popular Front (NFP) coalition’s surge foiled Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally (RN) party, but French politics is now more disordered than it was before the vote.

A Shock Victory, But Not Decisive

After leading the first round of voting last Sunday, the RN was closer to power than ever before, nearly forming France’s first far-right government since the collaborationist Vichy regime of World War II. However, after a week of political bargaining, where over 200 left-wing and centrist candidates withdrew to avoid splitting the vote, the NFP – a coalition of various parties from the extreme left to the more moderate – emerged with the most seats in the second round.

The NFP won 182 seats in the National Assembly, making it the largest group in the 577-seat parliament. Macron’s centrist Ensemble alliance, trailing in a distant third in the first round, mounted a strong recovery to win 163 seats. Despite leading the first round, the RN and its allies secured 143 seats.

This does not mean the NFP “won” the election outright. Although it has the most seats, it fell short of the 289 seats needed for an absolute majority, resulting in a hung parliament. This outcome is more a victory for the “cordon sanitaire,” the principle that mainstream parties must unite to prevent the extreme right from taking office.

The Far Right: Kept at Bay, Yet Potent

The RN had anticipated a celebratory night with supporters expecting their long-taboo brand of anti-immigrant politics to gain the most seats in the French parliament. However, as results came in, the RN fell to third place. Jordan Bardella, the 28-year-old leader chosen by Le Pen to refresh the party’s image and purge it of its racist and antisemitic roots, was visibly frustrated. He criticized the “dangerous electoral deals” between the NFP and Ensemble that had “deprived the French people” of an RN-led government.

“By deciding to deliberately paralyze our institutions, Emmanuel Macron has now pushed the country towards uncertainty and instability,” Bardella said, calling the NFP an “alliance of dishonor.”

Despite the setback, the RN’s success should not be underestimated. In 2017, the RN won just eight seats. By 2022, it surged to 89 seats. In Sunday’s vote, it won 125, making it the largest individual party. This unity suggests the RN will remain a significant force in the next parliament, while the leftist coalition’s solidity remains untested.

Will the Left Remain United?

A month ago, the NFP did not exist. Now, it is the largest bloc in the French parliament and could potentially provide France with its next prime minister. The NFP chose its name to resurrect the original Popular Front that blocked the far right from gaining power in 1936, and Sunday’s results suggest it has done so again.

However, the longevity of this broad and potentially fractious coalition is uncertain. The hastily assembled NFP includes several parties: the far-left France Unbowed party, the Socialists, the green Ecologists, the center-left Place Publique, and others.

This diverse group does not speak with one voice. Each party celebrated the results at their own campaign events rather than together. Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the populist France Unbowed leader, and Raphael Glucksmann, the more moderate leader of Place Publique, are barely on speaking terms.

Disagreements over economic and foreign policies could cause conflicts, as the NFP’s expansive spending plans – including raising the minimum wage, capping the price of certain foods and energy, and scrapping Macron’s pension reforms – clash with the European Union’s restrictive fiscal rules and France’s need to manage its ballooning deficit.

A Better Night for Macron Than Expected, But He Emerges Weakened

Macron once remarked that his thoughts are “too complex” for journalists. His decision to call a snap election three years earlier than necessary, with his party trailing in the polls, confused many political analysts, his closest allies, and French voters.

He announced the vote minutes after his party was trounced by the RN in last month’s European Parliament elections. Although European results do not directly affect domestic politics, Macron felt he could not ignore the voters’ message and wanted to clarify the political situation.

However, Sunday’s results suggest he achieved the opposite. Éduoard Philippe, France’s former prime minister and an ally of Macron, commented that what was “intended as a clarification has instead led to great vagueness.” Although Macron’s party recovered from the first round, it lost about 100 seats compared to the 2022 election.

Where Does France Go From Here?

Macron’s first decision is to appoint a new prime minister. He has delayed this process by declining Gabriel Attal’s resignation and asking him to remain in office for now.

Typically, the French president appoints a prime minister from the largest bloc in parliament. However, it is unclear which party within the NFP this will be. Mélenchon’s party won the most seats within the NFP, but Macron’s allies have repeatedly refused to work with France Unbowed, equating it to the RN in terms of extremism and unfitness to govern.

To reach a majority needed to pass laws, the NFP will likely have to form alliances with Ensemble, creating a coalition of coalitions that span a wide ideological spectrum. Finding common ground will be challenging, potentially leading to legislative gridlock. Without a clear majority, a minority government faces the risk of no-confidence votes soon, which could result in multiple governments succeeding each other.

One possible solution is a “technocratic” government, where Macron appoints ministers with no party affiliation to manage day-to-day affairs. However, these can seem undemocratic and may fuel populism. Italy’s experience, following the premiership of technocrat Mario Draghi and the subsequent election of its most far-right government since Benito Mussolini, serves as a cautionary tale. While France has avoided a far-right government for now, the RN threat remains significant.

Biden Adopts Aggressive Strategy to Counter Calls for Withdrawal and Solidify Position as Democratic Nominee

President Biden is adopting an aggressive and offensive strategy to counter calls for him to step down as the Democratic candidate following his poor debate performance against former President Trump.

This new, assertive approach is a stark departure from the previous week when some critics said he was slow to respond to Democrats and failed to counterattack amid increasing demands for his withdrawal.

The goal is to buy time as he and his advisors strategize ahead of the Democratic convention, portraying Biden as the one in control, according to Democrats close to his campaign.

“The strategy is a defiant one,” said a strategist close to Biden’s inner circle. “It’s basically, ‘I’ve got the delegates, so I control the process here,’ and essentially, ‘I control the narrative. Democratic voters voted for me to be the nominee, and I’m going to be the nominee in a few weeks.’”

In a letter to Democratic members of Congress on Monday, Biden called for unity behind him to defeat Trump, firmly rejecting calls for him to step down before lawmakers return to Congress.

“The question of how to move forward has been well-aired for over a week now. And it’s time for it to end,” Biden wrote. “We have one job, and that is to beat Donald Trump. We have 42 days to the Democratic Convention and 119 days to the general election. Any weakening of resolve or lack of clarity about the task ahead only helps Trump and hurts us.

“It’s time to come together, move forward as a unified party, and defeat Donald Trump,” Biden added.

Simultaneously, the president made a live call to MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” program on Monday to respond to his critics.

When co-host Mika Brzezinski introduced him as the presumptive Democratic nominee, a chuckling Biden said, “I’m more than presumptive. I’m going to be the Democratic nominee.”

“The bottom line here is that we’re not going anywhere. I am not going anywhere,” Biden told Brzezinski and co-host Joe Scarborough. “I wouldn’t be running if I didn’t absolutely believe that I am the best candidate to beat Donald Trump.”

Later that day, Biden spoke with major Democratic donors and vowed to beat Trump, declaring he was “done talking about the debate.”

“We can’t waste any more time being distracted,” he told the fundraisers.

More than a dozen Democratic strategists, operatives, and donors interviewed by The Hill expressed uncertainty about whether Biden’s approach would ultimately work.

Questions about the president’s health and stamina persist. On Monday, The New York Times reported that a Parkinson’s disease expert from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center visited the White House eight times from last September until this spring. One of these meetings was with Biden’s physician. The White House refuted the report, stating an examination found no signs of Parkinson’s and that the president is not being treated for it.

Nevertheless, Democrats welcomed Biden’s new strategy, seeing it as a significant improvement over his approach last week.

A former Biden administration official described it as a “good political strategy” by Biden and his team. “They are barreling forward,” the strategist said. “The [Democratic] leadership either seems to be quiet or on board. But what we don’t know is if there is a group of Democrats — not just one by one — who are willing to jump in front of the train.”

The former administration official acknowledged the time constraint — the Democratic convention begins in six weeks — suggesting the strategy could be effective. “Every week he’s still the nominee means it’s more likely he’ll be the nominee,” the official said.

Time is running out for the party to resolve its divisions and unite behind a candidate.

“There’s time but not a lot of it to see how things settle,” said former Rep. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.), who chaired the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Israel suggested Biden could use this week’s NATO summit in Washington to remind donors, activists, and voters of his leadership and demonstrate that the debate was an isolated incident.

But, Israel added, “clarity is critical, and this climate of doubt and despair can’t extend beyond the middle of the month.”

Democratic strategist Jim Manley admitted he was watching the fallout from the debate “with clear trepidation,” expressing confusion over Biden’s lack of engagement last week.

“The idea that it took four or five days to reach out to [House Minority Leader Hakeem] Jefferies and [Senate Majority Leader Chuck] Schumer was political malpractice,” Manley said.

However, the revised strategy is a “shot across the bow,” Manley added. “If his goal is to stay in the race, it’s absolutely the right thing to do. They’re sending a strong message to the Hill that they’re not backing down, and they’re drawing a line in the sand.”

Following Biden’s call with donors, one Democratic bundler felt slightly more optimistic: “When Biden has some piss and vinegar in him, how can you not feel better?”

By adopting a more aggressive approach, Biden aims to solidify his position as the Democratic nominee and counter the narrative that he should step down. His recent actions indicate a strong commitment to unifying the party and defeating Trump, despite ongoing concerns about his health and the party’s divisions.

India Day Parade in NYC to Feature Ayodhya Ram Mandir Replica, Celebrating Cultural Heritage and Unity

The Federation of Indian Associations (FIA) will feature a replica of the Ayodhya Ram Mandir at the upcoming India Day Parade in New York City. The temple was inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi earlier this year.

The announcement was made at a curtain-raiser event at the Consulate of India in New York. The replica is a collaborative effort between the Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America (VHPA) and FIA.

Organizers revealed that the replica will be an 18-foot-long, nine-foot-wide, and eight-foot-tall model custom-made in India and air-shipped specifically for the parade, which is touted as the largest celebration of India’s Independence Day outside India.

Amitabh Mittal, VHPA’s general secretary, mentioned that this will be the first time a replica of the Ram Mandir is displayed in the United States. Dr. Jai Bansal, VP of Education for VHPA, elaborated on the 500-year struggle to restore the demolished ancient temple, describing it as a “tryst with destiny” that was finally realized this year.

The inclusion of the Ram Mandir replica in the parade holds special significance for the diaspora community, providing them an opportunity to witness the temple’s grandeur without traveling to Ayodhya.

The release stated that the replica “symbolizes the perseverance and unity of the diaspora community and serves as a powerful reminder of cultural heritage and spiritual continuity, celebrating a landmark achievement in the history of Hindu Dharma.”

This year’s India Day Parade in New York, stretching from East 38th Street to East 27th Street in Midtown Manhattan, is expected to attract over 150,000 people. It will feature numerous floats representing various Indian American communities, showcasing the rich diversity of Indian culture.

Key volunteers, including Tejal Shah, VHPA joint secretary, Archna Kumar, and Sanjay Gupta, leaders of the FIA NJ Chapter, as well as other tristate chapter leaders, played a crucial role in making the replica display possible.

The Federation of Indian Associations (FIA) is set to feature a replica of the Ayodhya Ram Mandir at the upcoming India Day Parade in New York City, marking a significant cultural display for the diaspora community. The temple, inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi earlier this year, will be showcased in the parade through a collaboration between the Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America (VHPA) and FIA.

This announcement was made at a curtain-raiser event held at the Consulate of India in New York. The replica, an 18-foot-long, nine-foot-wide, and eight-foot-tall model, will be custom-made in India and air-shipped specifically for the parade. This event is recognized as the largest celebration of India’s Independence Day outside India.

According to Amitabh Mittal, the general secretary of VHPA, this will be the first instance of a Ram Mandir replica being displayed in the United States. Dr. Jai Bansal, VP of Education for VHPA, emphasized the 500-year effort to restore the ancient temple, describing it as a “tryst with destiny” that was finally fulfilled this year.

The inclusion of the Ram Mandir replica is highly significant for the diaspora community, offering a unique opportunity to witness the temple’s grandeur without needing to travel to Ayodhya. The replica “symbolizes the perseverance and unity of the diaspora community and serves as a powerful reminder of cultural heritage and spiritual continuity, celebrating a landmark achievement in the history of Hindu Dharma,” according to the release.

The annual India Day Parade in New York, which spans from East 38th Street to East 27th Street in Midtown Manhattan, is anticipated to draw more than 150,000 attendees. The parade will feature numerous floats representing various Indian American communities, highlighting the rich cultural diversity of India.

The display of the replica was made possible through the coordination of key volunteers, including Tejal Shah, VHPA joint secretary, Archna Kumar, and Sanjay Gupta, leaders of the FIA NJ Chapter, as well as leaders from other tristate chapters.

The Federation of Indian Associations (FIA) will feature a replica of the Ayodhya Ram Mandir at the upcoming India Day Parade in New York City. The temple was inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi earlier this year.

The announcement was made during a curtain-raiser event at the Consulate of India in New York. The display is a collaboration between the Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America (VHPA) and FIA.

The replica will be an 18-foot-long, nine-foot-wide, and eight-foot-tall model custom-made in India and air-shipped specifically for the parade. This event is touted as the largest celebration of India’s Independence Day outside India.

Amitabh Mittal, general secretary of VHPA, highlighted that this will be the first time a replica of the Ram Mandir is displayed in the United States. Dr. Jai Bansal, VP of Education for VHPA, described the 500-year effort to restore the ancient temple, calling it a “tryst with destiny” that was finally achieved this year.

The inclusion of the Ram Mandir replica is significant for the diaspora community, providing them a chance to see the temple’s grandeur without traveling to Ayodhya. The replica “symbolizes the perseverance and unity of the diaspora community and serves as a powerful reminder of cultural heritage and spiritual continuity, celebrating a landmark achievement in the history of Hindu Dharma,” the release stated.

The annual India Day Parade in New York, which runs from East 38th Street to East 27th Street in Midtown Manhattan, is expected to draw over 150,000 people. It will feature numerous floats representing various Indian American communities, showcasing the rich cultural diversity of India.

The display of the replica was made possible by the efforts of key volunteers, including Tejal Shah, VHPA joint secretary, Archna Kumar, and Sanjay Gupta, leaders of the FIA NJ Chapter, as well as leaders from other tristate chapters.

The Federation of Indian Associations (FIA) is set to feature a replica of the Ayodhya Ram Mandir at the upcoming India Day Parade in New York City. The temple, inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi earlier this year, will be showcased through a collaboration between the Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America (VHPA) and FIA.

The announcement was made at a curtain-raiser event held at the Consulate of India in New York. The replica, an 18-foot-long, nine-foot-wide, and eight-foot-tall model, will be custom-made in India and air-shipped specifically for the parade. This event is recognized as the largest celebration of India’s Independence Day outside India.

According to Amitabh Mittal, the general secretary of VHPA, this will be the first instance of a Ram Mandir replica being displayed in the United States. Dr. Jai Bansal, VP of Education for VHPA, emphasized the 500-year effort to restore the ancient temple, describing it as a “tryst with destiny” that was finally fulfilled this year.

The inclusion of the Ram Mandir replica is highly significant for the diaspora community, offering a unique opportunity to witness the temple’s grandeur without needing to travel to Ayodhya. The replica “symbolizes the perseverance and unity of the diaspora community and serves as a powerful reminder of cultural heritage and spiritual continuity, celebrating a landmark achievement in the history of Hindu Dharma,” according to the release.

The annual India Day Parade in New York, which spans from East 38th Street to East 27th Street in Midtown Manhattan, is anticipated to draw more than 150,000 attendees. The parade will feature numerous floats representing various Indian American communities, highlighting the rich cultural diversity of India.

The display of the replica was made possible through the coordination of key volunteers, including Tejal Shah, VHPA joint secretary, Archna Kumar, and Sanjay Gupta, leaders of the FIA NJ Chapter, as well as leaders from other tristate chapters.

Surya Kant of Tata Sons Joins US-India Strategic Partnership Forum Board of Directors

The US-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) has appointed Surya Kant, a senior advisor at Tata Sons Private Limited, to its board of directors.

Kant, with four decades of industry experience, plays a pivotal role in fostering significant initiatives between the US and India at Tata Sons Private Limited. He provides strategic advice to various Tata group companies on their US business strategies, helping them expand and explore new opportunities.

Kant represented Tata Sons at the launch of the U.S.-India Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET), a key bilateral initiative highlighted by the U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan during his recent visit to New Delhi.

Kant’s contributions to the Indian IT industry and Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), the Tata group’s leading IT and consulting services company, are substantial. He led TCS operations across multiple global offices, including those in the US, Japan, the UK, and North India.

Under Kant’s leadership, TCS North America’s annual revenues surged from $1 billion to $13 billion. He also managed TCS’s transition to becoming the title sponsor of the New York City Marathon, the world’s largest marathon.

Commenting on his appointment, Kant stated, “The relationship between India and the United States has grown from strength to strength. USISPF’s efforts to foster the bilateral connections are crucial, and I look forward to working with the other board members as we aim ever higher to realize the full potential of this unique partnership.”

USISPF president and CEO Dr. Mukesh Aghi expressed his enthusiasm for Kant’s appointment, saying, “I am thrilled to welcome Sury to the USISPF Board of Directors. USISPF’s growth is demonstrated by the growing strategic partnership between Washington and New Delhi. Sury’s leadership will help chart and guide the contours of the strategic partnership.”

Dr. Aghi added, “Sury understands the changing dynamic of tech, startups, and STEM education in fostering stronger partnerships between Washington and New Delhi. I am confident that, with his inputs and expertise, we will explore newer avenues and deeper areas of collaboration between the United States and India.”

The US-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) is committed to building the most influential partnership between the US and India. As the sole independent, not-for-profit institution dedicated to enhancing the U.S.-India relationship in Washington, D.C., and New Delhi, USISPF serves as a trusted partner for businesses, non-profit organizations, the diaspora, and the governments of both nations.

Modi Urges Peace in Ukraine During Moscow Visit, Criticized by Zelenskyy for Meeting Putin

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Moscow on Tuesday, July 9, and urged President Vladimir Putin to seek peace in the ongoing Ukraine conflict, stating that “war cannot solve problems.” This marked Modi’s first visit since Russia began its offensive in Ukraine in February 2022. During their discussions, Modi expressed his views on various issues, including the conflict in Ukraine, highlighting the need for dialogue to achieve peace. “When innocent children are murdered, one sees them die, the heart pains and that pain is unbearable,” Modi said in Hindi to Putin. He emphasized, “I know that war cannot solve problems, solutions and peace talks can’t succeed among bombs, guns, and bullets. And we need to find a way to peace through dialogue.”

Putin appreciated Modi’s focus on pressing global issues, acknowledging his efforts to seek peaceful solutions to the Ukrainian crisis. “You are trying to find some ways to solve the Ukrainian crisis, too, of course primarily by peaceful means,” Putin stated.

Modi’s visit came just hours after Russia launched a massive assault across Ukraine, killing at least 38 people and heavily damaging a children’s hospital in Kyiv, actions that drew sharp condemnation from European and North American governments. Upon arriving in Moscow on Monday evening, Modi was seen embracing Putin at the Russian president’s country residence, where they spent several hours in discussion, according to the Kremlin.

This show of camaraderie sparked criticism from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who took to social media to express his dismay. “It is a huge disappointment and a devastating blow to peace efforts to see the leader of the world’s largest democracy hug the world’s most bloody criminal in Moscow on such a day,” Zelenskyy wrote.

At the Kremlin, Putin lauded the enduring friendship between India and Russia, describing their relationship as a “specially privileged, strategic partnership.” Russia remains a key supplier of discounted oil and weapons to India, though Moscow’s increasing isolation from the West and closer ties with Beijing have affected its partnership with New Delhi. Meanwhile, Modi is fostering closer security ties with Western nations following his recent re-election as the leader of the world’s most populous country.

In recent years, Western powers have been strengthening their relations with India as a counterbalance to China’s growing influence in the Asia-Pacific region. They have also pressured New Delhi to distance itself from Russia. The United States urged Modi on Monday to ensure that any resolution to the conflict in Ukraine respects the UN Charter and Ukraine’s territorial integrity.

Modi last visited Russia in 2019 and welcomed Putin to New Delhi two years later, just weeks before Russia’s offensive against Ukraine commenced. India has refrained from explicitly condemning Russia, abstaining from United Nations resolutions aimed at the Kremlin.

The Ukraine conflict has had significant repercussions for India. In February, New Delhi urged Moscow to repatriate several Indian citizens who had joined Russian “support jobs,” following reports that some had been killed after being compelled to fight in Ukraine. Additionally, Russia’s growing relationship with China has raised concerns. The United States and the European Union accuse China of providing components and equipment that have bolstered Russia’s military capabilities, though Beijing denies these allegations. China and India remain intense rivals, competing for strategic dominance in South Asia.

India and Russia have maintained strong ties since the Cold War, with Russia becoming a key arms supplier to India. However, the Ukraine conflict has strained Russia’s weapons supplies, prompting India to seek alternative sources, including bolstering its own defense industry. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute noted that Russia’s share of Indian arms imports has significantly decreased in recent years.

At the same time, India has become a major buyer of Russian crude oil, providing Russia with a crucial export market after traditional buyers in Europe reduced their purchases. This shift has dramatically altered their economic relationship, with India saving billions of dollars while supporting Russia’s war finances. According to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, India’s month-on-month imports of Russian crude increased by 8 percent in May, reaching the highest levels since July 2023. However, this has also led to India’s trade deficit with Russia rising to over $57 billion in the past financial year.

Following his visit to Moscow, Modi will travel to Vienna, marking the first visit by an Indian leader to the Austrian capital since Indira Gandhi in 1983.

Florida Farmers Turn to Ancient Pongamia Trees for Sustainable Biofuel and Protein Solutions

An ancient tree from India, the pongamia, is now thriving in Florida where citrus trees once flourished and could potentially help provide renewable energy. The citrus industry in Florida has suffered due to diseases like greening and citrus canker, leading farmers to seek alternatives such as the pongamia tree, known for its resilience and potential to produce plant-based proteins and sustainable biofuel.

Historically, pongamia has been used as a shade tree, producing inedible legumes due to their bitterness. Unlike orange and grapefruit trees, pongamia trees require minimal care, no fertilizer or pesticides, and can thrive in varying weather conditions. Harvesting the beans is straightforward, requiring just a machine to shake them from the branches.

Terviva, a San Francisco-based company founded in 2010 by Naveen Sikka, uses a patented process to remove the bitter-tasting biopesticides, making the beans suitable for food production. “Florida offers a rare opportunity for both Terviva and former citrus farmers. The historical decline of the citrus industry has left farmers without a crop that can grow profitably on hundreds of thousands of acres, and there needs to be a very scalable replacement, very soon,” Sikka told The Associated Press. “Pongamia is the perfect fit.”

The pongamia tree, native to India, Southeast Asia, and Australia, is now being used to produce various products, including Ponova culinary oil and protein, featured in Aloha’s Kona protein bars. The tree also produces oil that can be used as a biofuel, especially in aviation, which has a low carbon footprint, according to Ron Edwards, Terviva’s chairman and a long-time Florida citrus grower.

Transforming pongamia from a wild to a domesticated tree has been challenging. “There are no books to read on it, either, because no one else has ever done it,” Edwards said. The tree supports local biodiversity by attracting bees and other pollinators to its flowers. An acre of pongamia trees can produce as much oil as four acres of soybeans. After extracting the oil, the remaining high-grade protein can be used in baking, smoothies, and other plant-based protein products, showing potential for both the food and petroleum industries.

Sikka emphasized the advantages of growing pongamia in Florida: “We know pongamia grows well in Florida, and the end markets for the oil and protein that come from the pongamia beans — biofuel, feed, and food ingredients — are enormous. So farmers can now reduce their costs and more closely align to the leading edge of sustainable farming practices.”

At a nursery near Fort Pierce, workers skilled in pongamia grafting techniques ensure the genetics and desired characteristics of the mother tree are perpetuated in all of Terviva’s trees.

Citrus was Florida’s premier crop until the 1990s when citrus canker and later greening began to devastate groves. Citrus canker, a bacterial disease, causes lesions on fruit, stems, and leaves, eventually making the trees unproductive. Citrus greening, or Huanglongbing, slowly kills trees and degrades the fruit, reducing citrus production in Florida by 75% since 2005. The disease has spread to Louisiana, Texas, and California. Hurricane Ian caused $1.8 billion in damages to Florida’s agriculture in September 2023, further impacting the citrus industry.

Global citrus production has also been affected by disease and climate issues. Brazil, the world’s largest orange juice exporter, is facing its worst harvest in 36 years due to flooding and drought, according to Fundecitrus, a citrus growers’ organization in Sao Paulo state.

However, pongamia trees are largely unaffected by climate and disease. “It’s just tough, a jungle-tested tree,” Edwards said. “It stands up to a lot of abuse with very little caretaking.” Pongamia also thrives in Hawaii, on land previously used for sugarcane.

John Olson, owner of Circle O Ranch west of Fort Pierce, has replaced his grapefruit groves with 215 acres of pongamia trees. “We went through all the ups and downs of citrus and eventually because of greening, abandoned citrus production,” Olson said. “For the most part, the citrus industry has died in Florida.” In the 1980s and 1990s, a grove of similar size was profitable, but the costs of combating disease eventually became too high.

Edwards shared his motivation for switching to pongamia: “What attracted me to pongamia was the fact that one it can repurpose fallow land that was citrus and is now lying dormant. From an ecological point of view, it’s very attractive because it can replace some of the oils and vegetable proteins that are now being generated by things like palm oil, which is environmentally a much more damaging crop.”

In December 2023, Terviva signed an agreement with Mitsubishi Corporation to provide biofuel feedstock that can be converted into biodiesel, renewable diesel, and sustainable aviation fuel. “Our partnership with Mitsubishi is off to a great start,” Sikka said, noting that the company coordinates closely with Mitsubishi on tree plantings and product development and sales. “Terviva’s progress has accelerated thanks to Mitsubishi’s expertise and leadership around the globe on all facets of Terviva’s business.”

Research on pongamia’s food products is ongoing. Edwards mentioned they have successfully made graham crackers and other plant-based protein products, including flour and protein bars. Pongamia offers an alternative to soybean and yellow pea protein “if you don’t want your protein to come from meat,” he said.

Biden Stands Firm Amid Calls to Drop Reelection Bid, Rallies Democratic Support to Defeat Trump

President Joe Biden stood resolute on Monday against growing calls to withdraw his reelection bid, urging an end to the intraparty turmoil that has plagued Democrats since his disappointing debate performance last month. Key lawmakers expressed their support for Biden to continue his campaign for the 2024 presidential race.

With congressional Democrats returning to Washington, torn between reviving Biden’s campaign or pushing him out, Biden addressed them in an open letter. He sought to quell doubts about his capability to lead for another term, emphasizing the party’s “one job” of defeating the presumptive Republican nominee, Donald Trump, in November.

After several attempts, Biden and his campaign’s efforts to consolidate Democratic support seemed to be bearing fruit, though not all doubts were dispelled. By late Monday, a surge of public support from Democrats emerged, with Biden allies attempting to drown out voices urging him to step aside.

In his two-page letter, Biden stated, “the question of how to move forward has been well-aired for over a week now. And it’s time for it to end.”

“We have 42 days to the Democratic Convention and 119 days to the general election,” Biden wrote, distributed by his reelection campaign. “Any weakening of resolve or lack of clarity about the task ahead only helps Trump and hurts us. It’s time to come together, move forward as a unified party, and defeat Donald Trump.”

Biden reinforced his message in a phone interview with MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” insisting that “average Democrats” want him to remain in the race and expressing frustration over calls from party officials for him to step aside.

“They’re big names, but I don’t care what those big names think,” Biden said.

He challenged his critics to “announce for president, challenge me at the convention” or support him against Trump. Later, Biden spoke with his national finance committee, while First Lady Jill Biden campaigned in three states, engaging with veterans and military families.

“For all the talk out there about this race, Joe has made it clear that he’s all in,” she told a military crowd in Wilmington, North Carolina. “That’s the decision that he’s made, and just as he has always supported my career, I am all in, too.”

According to a New York Times/Siena College poll, Democratic voters are divided on whether Biden should continue as the party’s nominee or if a different candidate should be chosen.

On Capitol Hill, notable support came from the chair of the House’s Congressional Progressive Caucus, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, who deemed the threat of a second Trump presidency too significant to abandon Biden. However, Sen. Jon Tester of Montana, a vulnerable Democrat, said, “President Biden has got to prove to the American people — including me — that he’s up to the job for another four years.”

Biden’s letter angered some House Democrats, who wanted direct communication from him. According to a House aide, lawmakers felt slighted by suggestions they were out of touch with voters.

Biden met virtually with the Congressional Black Caucus, a strong supporter base, for 30 minutes, discussing his policy proposals for a second term, expressing gratitude, and criticizing Trump, as per a person familiar with the call.

While not all Black Caucus members voiced opinions, none opposed the president, the person said.

Biden plans to meet this week with the Congressional Progressive Caucus, according to Jayapal.

Press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre mentioned that Biden underwent three neurological exams during his White House tenure, part of his annual physical exams, and was neither diagnosed with nor treated for Parkinson’s.

The political drama unfolds just over a month before the Democratic National Convention and a week before Republicans gather in Milwaukee to renominate Trump.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., a progressive lawmaker, expressed her support for Biden and concern that Democrats were losing focus on defeating Trump. “We’re losing the plot here,” she said.

Rep. Maxine Waters of California, a prominent Black Caucus member, stated that those opposing Biden “can speak for themselves or what they want to do, but I know what I’m doing because I’m a big Biden supporter.”

Rep. Frank Pallone of New Jersey, top Democrat on the Energy and Commerce Committee, added, “I’m tired of all this speculation. I just want to concentrate on the fact that we have to defeat Trump.”

Trump predicted Biden would stay in the race, telling Fox News Channel’s Sean Hannity, “It looks to me like he may very well stay in. He’s got an ego and he doesn’t want to quit. He doesn’t want to do that.”

House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, supportive of Biden despite addressing his conference’s concerns, reiterated his stance, saying “same answer” when asked if he supported Biden after an evening Capitol meeting.

Other House Democrats avoided questions, with Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-Mich., stating she was off to another meeting and Reps. Abigail Spanberger of Virginia and Lauren Underwood of Illinois declining to comment.

Rep. Adam Smith of Washington, top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, publicly called for Biden to step aside, stating it would be “a mistake” for Biden to continue his campaign. “I’m calling on President Biden to step down,” Smith said on social media.

Biden’s allies anticipated more direct engagement with lawmakers. On a call with his campaign co-chairs, Biden repeatedly asked whom he needed to engage with, who needed to hear from him, and who had unanswered questions or concerns, according to Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del.

“He is out there doing his job as a candidate and doing his job as president,” Coons said.

Rep. Annie Kuster of New Hampshire, chair of the New Democrat Coalition, requested House leadership invite Biden to speak to the entire Democratic caucus.

“If the president’s going to stay in the race, then help us respond to questions from our constituents,” she said. “And it’s so much easier to say, I was with him.”

Rep. Nanette Barragan of California, chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, who supports Biden and recently campaigned with the First Lady in Pennsylvania, said Biden “should talk to as many members as possible.”

Senators returning to Washington were generally hesitant to criticize Biden, awaiting a Democratic caucus meeting to address concerns. It was unclear if any Senate Democrats would publicly call for Biden to step down, despite private concerns over the last ten days.

“He ran an excellent campaign, and he’s been an excellent president,” said Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado. “And I think what everybody is trying to satisfy is that’s the same trajectory and path that we’re on today.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer avoided questions about Biden’s reelection but stated, “As I’ve said before, I’m for Joe.”

Sen. Alex Padilla of California added it was “time to quit the hand-wringing and get back to door knocking.”

While some wealthy donors showed discomfort, strategists for House and Senate races reported record fundraising, with donors viewing congressional Democrats as a “firewall” against Trump.

Justin Bieber Joins Star-Studded Celebrations for Ambani Wedding

Justin Bieber is the latest international star to perform for Anant Ambani, the son of India’s richest man, and his fiancée, Radhika Merchant, as part of their grand pre-wedding festivities in Mumbai. Bieber’s performance over the weekend follows a series of extravagant celebrations that have captivated global attention.

The couple’s first pre-wedding event featured Rihanna, while the second, a Mediterranean cruise, showcased performances by The Backstreet Boys, Katy Perry, and Italian tenor Andrea Bocelli. These events have set high expectations for the actual wedding, which is slated to take place this weekend. Speculation about the wedding performer is rife, with Adele rumored to be the next big name, although the family has not confirmed this.

The Ambani family’s celebrations have been nothing short of lavish, putting them in a different league from even the most extravagant Indian weddings. This weekend’s sangeet ceremony was a night of music and dance, adhering to the Ambani tradition of going above and beyond. Mukesh Ambani, head of Reliance Industries and with a net worth of $115 billion according to Forbes, participated in a choreographed dance to Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan’s hit song, “Deewangi Deewangi,” alongside his family.

The events have not only been musical extravaganzas but also fashion showcases. Guests, including some of India’s most glamorous stars, have worn dresses by the country’s top designers, turning the pre-wedding events into catwalks. Professional shots of these outfits have been widely shared on social media.

The costs associated with these parties are not disclosed, but rumors suggest Rihanna was paid $7 million for her performance, while Bieber’s fee is said to be $10 million. As for the upcoming three-day wedding event, the specifics remain under wraps. For many in India, there will be a sense of relief once the wedding and its associated extravagance conclude, although Mumbai residents are concerned about the potential impact on the city’s notoriously bad traffic.

Radhika Merchant recently told Vogue US that the wedding planning was “going great” and expressed her excitement about the upcoming marriage.

Lucky Baskhar Gets New Release Date

The much-anticipated film “Lucky Baskhar,” directed by Venky Atluri, has a new release date. Initially slated to hit theaters on September 27, the film will now be released on September 7, coinciding with the Ganesh Chaturthi festival. Dulquer Salmaan, the lead actor, took to X (formerly known as Twitter) to share this update with fans.

Announcement by Dulquer Salmaan

Dulquer Salmaan announced the new release date on X, accompanied by a fresh still from the movie. He wrote, “This Vinayaka Chaturthi, Get ready to experience #LuckyBaskhar’s unforgettable journey on the Big Screens! Worldwide Grand Release on 7th SEPT in Telugu, Malayalam, Tamil & Hindi Languages. #LuckyBaskharOnSept7th.” This announcement has generated significant excitement among fans eagerly awaiting the film’s release.

Original Release Plans and Changes

Originally, “Lucky Baskhar” was set to premiere on September 27, alongside Sujeeth’s Pawan Kalyan-starrer “They Call Him OG.” However, due to delays in wrapping up “They Call Him OG,” caused by Pawan Kalyan’s political engagements, the release of “Lucky Baskhar” has been advanced. This move is expected to benefit the film by avoiding a direct clash at the box office.

Teaser Release and Storyline

In April, Dulquer Salmaan released the teaser for “Lucky Baskhar,” providing a glimpse into the film’s plot. The teaser portrays Baskhar as a bored banker working at the fictional Magadha Bank. He is depicted as a ‘common, middle-class, Indian man’ who is weary of his monotonous daily routine. This includes waking up, getting dressed, dealing with traffic, and performing his repetitive job, only to fall asleep at work. The teaser hints at a significant turning point when Baskhar stumbles upon a large sum of money, raising curiosity about how he acquired it. Meenakshi Chaudhary plays the role of the woman Baskhar loves, adding a romantic angle to the story.

Setting and Production Details

“Lucky Baskhar” is set against the backdrop of the late 1980s to early 1990s, focusing on the life of a bank cashier during that era. The filmmakers went to great lengths to recreate the period accurately. The shooting was completed in Hyderabad, where the production team constructed sets resembling Bombay of the 80s. This included building a bank that mirrors those from that time. Such meticulous attention to detail was aimed at ensuring authenticity in the portrayal of the era.

Cast and Crew

Meenakshi Chaudhary stars alongside Dulquer Salmaan in the film. The music for “Lucky Baskhar” has been composed by GV Prakash Kumar, adding to the film’s nostalgic feel. The production is handled by Naga Vamsi and Sai Soujanya under the banners of Sitara Entertainments and Fortune Four Cinemas. Srikara Studios is presenting the film.

Banglan, the production designer, conducted extensive research to bring authenticity to the sets, ensuring that the visual elements accurately reflect the period in which the film is set. Cinematographer Nimish Ravi played a crucial role in bringing director Venky Atluri’s vision to life through his camera work, capturing the essence of the late 80s and early 90s.

Multilingual Release

“Lucky Baskhar” will be released in four languages: Telugu, Tamil, Malayalam, and Hindi. This multilingual release strategy aims to reach a broader audience across different regions, reflecting the diverse linguistic landscape of India.

PV Sindhu and Sharath Kamal Named Flag Bearers for 2024 Paris Olympics; Gagan Narang Appointed Chef-de-Mission

Ace shuttler PV Sindhu will be the female flag bearer for India during the opening ceremony of the 2024 Paris Olympics, a momentous occasion for the nation. Simultaneously, London Olympic bronze medallist shooter Gagan Narang has replaced the legendary boxer Mary Kom as India’s Chef-de-Mission for the Summer Olympics, a significant leadership role. This change was announced by the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) on Monday.

PT Usha, the IOA president, explained that Narang’s elevation from the deputy Chef-de-Mission position became an automatic choice following Mary Kom’s resignation. “I was looking for an Olympic medallist to lead our contingent, and my young colleague is an apt replacement for Mary Kom,” PT Usha stated in a press release.

In addition to this announcement, PT Usha confirmed that table tennis ace Sharath Kamal would join badminton superstar Sindhu as India’s flag-bearers for the Paris Games. “I am also delighted to announce that India’s only woman to win two Olympic medals, PV Sindhu, will be the female flag-bearer alongside table tennis ace Sharath Kamal in the opening ceremony,” she added.

The process of selecting Narang as the Chef-de-Mission highlighted his prominent position in Indian sports. Narang emerged as the frontrunner for this prestigious role ahead of the Summer Games. Mary Kom, a six-time world champion, had stepped down as Chef-de-Mission in April due to personal reasons, having been appointed to the position by the IOA in March. The role of the Chef-de-Mission is crucial, as it involves ensuring the welfare of the participating athletes and liaising with the organizing committee at the Summer Games.

To provide some context, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) changed its protocol in 2020 to allow one female and one male athlete to bear the flag jointly during the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games. This change was significant in promoting gender equality and representation at the Games. At the Tokyo Olympics, boxing icon Mary Kom and former hockey captain Manpreet Singh had the honor of being India’s flag bearers.

Looking ahead to the Paris Olympics, India will field its largest-ever shooting contingent, with 21 Indian medal contenders having secured their spots for the Games. This remarkable achievement underscores the country’s growing prowess in shooting sports and raises hopes for a strong performance in Paris.

PT Usha expressed her confidence in the preparedness of Indian athletes for the upcoming Games. “I am confident that our athletes are well prepared to deliver the best results for India in Paris 2024 Olympic Games,” she said, emphasizing the hard work and dedication of the athletes as they gear up for the global event.

The selection of PV Sindhu and Sharath Kamal as flag bearers, along with the appointment of Gagan Narang as Chef-de-Mission, signifies a strategic move by the IOA to enhance India’s representation and performance at the Paris Olympics. With the athletes’ rigorous preparation and the support of experienced leaders, India looks forward to making a significant impact on the Olympic stage.

Modi’s Russia Visit: Talks with Putin on Ukraine Conflict and Expanding Economic Ties

Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in Russia on Monday for his first visit to the country in nearly five years. His discussions with President Vladimir Putin are set to cover a range of topics, from economic cooperation to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

The last meeting between the two leaders occurred in September 2022, during a Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit in Uzbekistan. This was months after Russia had invaded Ukraine, leading to Western sanctions that strained New Delhi-Moscow relations. During that meeting, Modi urged Putin to end the conflict, stating, “today’s era is not of war.”

Upon his arrival at Moscow’s Vnukovo-II VIP airport, Modi was greeted by Denis Manturov, Russia’s first deputy prime minister, who extended a tri-services guard of honor. Manturov, senior to the deputy prime minister who had welcomed Chinese President Xi Jinping recently, escorted Modi to his hotel.

Before the 22nd India-Russia Summit on Tuesday, Putin hosted Modi for a private meeting and dinner at his dacha in Novo-Ogaryovo, a privilege reserved for a select few visiting leaders. This private setting allowed the leaders to discuss sensitive issues like the Ukraine conflict and the repatriation of Indian nationals recruited into the Russian Army.

Economic cooperation, including energy, trade, manufacturing, and fertilizers, is the primary focus of this visit. In the context of the Ukraine war, an Indian official mentioned that the Indian side would stress that “a solution cannot be found on the battlefield.”

In a statement before his departure from New Delhi, Modi expressed his anticipation to “review all aspects of bilateral cooperation with my friend President Vladimir Putin and share perspectives on various regional and global issues.” He added, “We seek to play a supportive role for a peaceful and stable region.”

Modi highlighted that the special and privileged strategic partnership between India and Russia had progressed over the past decade in areas such as energy, security, trade, investment, health, education, culture, tourism, and people-to-people exchanges.

On Tuesday, Modi’s engagements will start with an interaction with the Indian community. He will then lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at the Kremlin and visit the Rosatom pavilion, showcasing the latest advancements in nuclear energy. Modi and Putin will hold restricted discussions followed by delegation-level talks during the annual summit.

In a significant move, Modi chose Russia for his first bilateral visit in his third term, just weeks after traveling to Italy for the G7 Summit’s outreach session. This decision is viewed as an assertion of India’s policy of “strategic autonomy” in its foreign affairs and the significance New Delhi places on its relationship with Moscow.

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar noted that the annual summit, last held in 2021, provides an opportunity for Modi and Putin to discuss crucial issues like the trade imbalance. While India and Russia had aimed for bilateral trade of $30 billion by 2025, it surged to $65.7 billion in 2023-24, primarily due to India’s purchases of discounted Russian crude following Western sanctions and a price cap. Trade is currently skewed in Russia’s favor, with Indian exports amounting to less than $5 billion.

The Indian side is expected to urge Russia to diversify and increase its imports. Both countries will also work on streamlining payments in national currencies and overcoming the constraints imposed by Western sanctions on Russia’s banking system.

Foreign Secretary Vinay Kwatra mentioned that the early discharge of Indian nationals “misled into the service of the Russian Army” would also be discussed. Although the exact number of Indians serving in the Russian military is unclear, estimates range from 30 to 45. Following the deaths of four Indians on the Ukraine frontlines, India has sought a “verified stop” to further recruitment by the Russian Army.

Despite these discussions, India will continue to navigate the diplomatic complexities of the Ukraine issue. Concurrently with the Modi-Putin summit, US President Joe Biden will host NATO leaders to celebrate the alliance’s 75th anniversary. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who met Modi at the G7 Summit, will also attend the meeting in Washington.

Following his Russia visit, Modi will head to Austria, becoming the first Indian premier to visit the country in over four decades. He will meet President Alexander Van der Bellen and Chancellor Karl Nehammer to discuss enhancing the bilateral “partnership to even greater heights in new and emerging areas of innovation, technology, and sustainable development.” Modi emphasized, “Austria is our steadfast and reliable partner, and we share the ideals of democracy and pluralism.”

Modi and Nehammer will also engage with business leaders from both nations to explore mutually beneficial trade and investment opportunities. Additionally, Modi will interact with the Indian community in Austria.

Rahul Gandhi – The Man of the Moment

On July 1, 2024, Rahul Gandhi, participating in the debate on the Motion of Thanks to the President’s address, made an astounding maiden speech as the Leader of the Opposition (LOP) in the House of the People (Lok Sabha) of Indian Parliament – the first day by a recognised LOP in a decade.

Rahul Gandhi was interrupted by Narendra Modi twice, Amit Shah four times, and four other top Ministers – Rajnath Singh, Kiren Rijiju, Bhupender Yadav and Shivraj Chavan – and other members of the treasury, citing rules and trying to prevent Rahul Gandhi from making his speech on one pretext or the other, and Amit Shah even seeking protection from the Speaker against Gandhi’s relentless attack on the government. They were rattled by his speech. He remained undeterred. The treasury benches did not expect him to make such a fiery speech that lasted more than 100 minutes and take the ruling party to task. After the House was adjourned, the Home Minister and the Parliamentary Affairs Minister met the Speakers and pressurised them to expunge certain remarks of Rahul Gandhi from the record. Some 14 portions from his speech were expunged arbitrarily, in gross violation of the norms of Parliamentary democracy. It insults the LOP, who represents the entire Opposition in the House. Rahul Gandhi wrote a letter to the Speaker protesting against this selective expunging. What he said is nothing unparliamentary or objectionable. The treasury benches simply wanted to delete the inconvenient facts from the Lok Sabha record.

The letter reads: “While the Chair derives powers to expunge certain remarks from the proceedings of the House, but the expulsion is only those kinds of words, the nature of which has been specified in Rule 380 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha. I am, however, shocked to note the manner in which considerable portions of my speech have been simply taken off from the proceedings under the garb of expunction. I am constrained to state that the portions expunged do not come under the ambit of Rule 380. What I sought to convey in the House is ground reality, the factual position. Every member of the House who personifies the collective voice of the people whom he or she represents has the freedom of speech as enshrined in Article 105(1) of the Constitution of India. It is every member’s right to raise people’s concerns on the floor of the House. It is that right and in exercise of obligations to the people of the country that I was exercising yesterday. Taking off from records, my considerable remarks go against the very tenets of parliamentary democracy. I request that the remarks expunged from the proceedings be restored.”

Speaking to the Media the next day, Rahul Gandhi said: “In Modiji’s world, truth can be expunged. But in reality, the truth can’t be expunged. I said what I had to say, that is the truth. They can expunge as much as they want. Truth is truth.” In reacting to the attack on the Congress office in Ahmedabad by the BJP workers, following his speech, he said: “The cowardly and violent attack on the Gujarat Congress office further reinforces my point about the BJP and the Sangh Parivar. BJP people who spread violence and hatred do not understand the basic principles of Hinduism.” The July 3 editorial in The Free Press Journal reads: “The essence of his address was to highlight the ethos of India, Bharat, which is fundamentally rooted in peace and non-violence… He invoked the symbolism of the open palm, a gesture widely recognised among religious leaders and icons, to emphasise the nation’s core values. Gandhi portrayed the Indian people as inherently fearless, unwilling to bow before dictators.” He resonated with many who have felt marginalised over the past five years, during a period marked by division rather than unity and recrimination rather than reconciliation. As someone who has endured political adversity and suffered ridicule and campaign of calumny for so long, his indignation was palpable, reflecting the sentiments of the people he represents.

The next day, July 2, Narendra Modi mounted a scathing attack on Congress, particularly on Rahul Gandhi, in his speech, which lasted more than two hours amid non-stop sloganeering by the Opposition. Instead of answering the issues raised by Rahul Gandhi, he spent most of his time attacking Congress, from Pandit Nehru to Rahul Gandhi, by distorting the truth and telling lies to the nation. Modi chose to personalise his attack on Rahul Gandhi, calling him ‘childish’ and ‘juvenile’ and ‘infantile’ and the Congress a ‘parasite’, demonstrating his mental bankruptcy, disrespecting the self and the high office that he holds. If Rahul Gandhi’s remarks could be expunged based on ground reality, why can Modi’s cheap and coarse words go on record? How could Modi say anything, use derogatory language, ridicule and insult the LOP, and get away with impunity? Modi was no match for Gandhi’s intellectual prowess; he came as an arrogant, poorly read, uninformed and insincere leader.

Valson Thampu, theologian and retired Principal of St. Stephen’s College, Delhi, has beautifully analysed Rahul Gandhi’s speech in his YouTube videos. He calls him ‘the man of the moment for the destiny of India’ that history has thrown up. He decodes Rahul Gandhi’s ‘volcanic speech’ and describing it as ‘the most unforgettable matchless powerful historical speech’. No one actually expected an atomic bomb like this. The treasury benches were taken aback. Rahul demolished the Modi magic. He says Rahul made ‘a memorable historical speech’. The contrast between Rahul and Modi: Rahul confines himself largely to themes, patterns, and principles, as well as the issues relating to the ideology of the Sangh Parivar and how Hinduism is abused and misused. It is ideas vs personal attacks. Ideas must be countered by ideas and ideology by ideology. To Modi, it has become his second nature to attack personally, leading to the vilification of Rahul Gandhi. Sooner or later, the people of India are bound to see through it. It is utterly infantile. Modi gets fixated and obsessed with Rahul Gandhi, which makes him unwilling to adapt to the changing reality. This is not a sign of maturity. It is a self-seeking pursuit to perpetuate power.

Modi is carrying the coalition government in the same bulldozing style, as if nothing has happened. What is worrisome is that despite reduced numbers and an unequivocal message from the people, he is in no mood to concede even an inch to the Opposition. Unless and until he changes his style of functioning, he will invite more trouble from a resurgent Opposition and find it difficult to run the government. He has not understood Rahul Gandhi’s power of truth.

Americans Are Split Over The State Of The American Dream

“The American dream” is a century-old phrase used to describe the idea that anyone can achieve success in the United States through hard work and determination. Today, about half of Americans (53%) say that dream is still possible.

How we did this

Americans Are Split Over The State Of The American Dream1

Another 41% say the American dream was once possible for people to achieve – but is not anymore. And 6% say it was never possible, according to a recent Pew Research Center survey of 8,709 U.S. adults.

While this is the first time the Center has asked about the American dream in this way, other surveys have long found that sizable shares of Americans are skeptical about the future of the American dream.

Who believes the American dream is still possible?

There are relatively modest differences in views of the American dream by race and ethnicity, partisanship, and education. But there are wider divides by age and income.

Age

Americans ages 50 and older are more likely than younger adults to say the American dream is still possible. About two-thirds of adults ages 65 and older (68%) say this, as do 61% of those 50 to 64.

By comparison, only about four-in-ten adults under 50 (42%) say it’s still possible for people to achieve the AmericanAmericans Are Split Over The State Of The American Dream2 dream.

Income

Higher-income Americans are also more likely than others to say the American dream is still achievable.

While 64% of upper-income Americans say the American dream still exists, 39% of lower-income Americans say the same – a gap of 25 percentage points.

Middle-income Americans fall in between, with a 56% majority saying the American dream is still possible.

Race and ethnicity

Roughly half of Americans in each racial and ethnic group say the American dream remains possible. And while relatively few Americans – just 6% overall – say that the American dream was never possible, Black Americans are about twice as likely as those in other groups to say this (11%).

Partisanship

While 56% of Republicans and Republican leaners say the American dream is still possible to achieve, 50% of Democrats and Democratic leaners say the same.

Education

A 57% majority of adults with a bachelor’s degree or more education say the American dream remains possible, compared with 50% of those with less education.

Age and income differences within both parties

Americans Are Split Over The State Of The American Dream 3Age and income differences in views of the American dream persist within each political party.

Age

Clear majorities of both Republicans (64%) and Democrats (67%) ages 50 and older say achieving the American dream is still possible.

In contrast, just 38% of Democrats under 50 and 48% of Republicans under 50 view the American dream as still possible.

Income

In both parties, upper-income Americans are about 25 points more likely than lower-income Americans to say it is still possible for people to achieve the American dream.

Do people think they can achieve the American dream?

Americans are also divided over whether they think they personally can achieve the American dream. About three-in-ten (31%) say they’ve achieved it, while a slightly larger share (36%) say they are on their way to achieving it. Another 30% say it’s out of reach for them. These views are nearly identical to when the Center last asked this question in 2022.

Race and ethnicityAmericans Are Split Over The State Of The American Dream4

White adults (39%) are more likely than Black (15%) and Hispanic adults (19%), and about as likely as Asian adults (34%), to say they have already achieved the American dream.

Black (48%), Hispanic (47%) and Asian adults (46%) are more likely than White adults (29%) to say they are on their way to achieving it.

Party

Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say they have achieved the American dream (38% vs. 28%). But Democrats are somewhat more likely than Republicans to say they’re on the way to achieving it (38% vs. 34%). Democrats are also more likely than Republicans to view the American dream as personally out of reach.

Income and age

Older and higher-income Americans are more likely than younger and less wealthy Americans to say they have achieved or are within reach of the American dream. These patterns are similar to those for views about the American dream more generally.

Sant Rajinder Singh Ji Maharaj’s Special Meditation Event Attracts Thousands in Toronto

Toronto, ON – After nearly a decade-long wait, world-renowned Spiritual Master, best-selling author and global humanitarian, Sant Rajinder Singh Ji Maharaj returned to Toronto, spreading joy, spiritual wisdom, and love. The two-day special meditation event at Delta Hotels Toronto Airport attracted thousands of participants from Greater Toronto Area and from across the world.

Sant Rajinder Singh Ji Maharaj’s Special Meditation Event Attracts Thousands in Toronto 2During the enlightening sessions, Sant Rajinder Singh Ji talked about Spiritual Love, unravelling secrets to lasting happiness through meditation and self-introspection. He explained, “spiritual love is the love between our soul and God, the Creator. The love we find in this physical world is the love at the level of body and mind which is temporary. The love of God is eternal and it is never going to fade. We can experience spiritual love by rising above physical body consciousness through a technique called meditation.” He shared a simple yet powerful meditation technique that can be practiced by individuals from all walks of life, regardless of age, gender, or cultural traditions to experience everlasting spiritual love.

The five-day event of free public talks in English and Hindi resonated with the attendees who appreciated the practical tips and simple meditation technique for self-discovery and self – introspection. During the event, Sant Rajinder Singh Ji Maharaj  released the French translation of his latest book, Detox the Mind: Detoxifier Le Mental. In this inspirational book,  Sant Rajinder Singh Ji Maharaj provides a step-by-step process for embarking on the inner journey along with simple, engaging exercises to remove mental blockages and discover joy, love, and peace within.

Sant Rajinder Singh Ji Maharaj also inaugurated the SOS Ontario Meditation Centre. Located in the city ofSant Rajinder Singh Ji Maharaj’s Special Meditation Event Attracts Thousands in Toronto 1 Brampton, the Centre offers an intimate setting for mediation, spiritual fellowship, and community outreach. It is open to all seekers looking to take a deep dive into their spiritual journey. The spiritually enriching program ended with a farewell picnic at the scenic Niagra Falls.

The Toronto event marked another milestone in Sant Rajinder Singh Ji Maharaj’s mission to spread the message of peace, love, and spiritual growth through meditation. Sant Rajinder Singh Ji Maharaj’s life and work can be summed up as a continuous journey of love and selfless service to help people discover life’s true purpose. For the last 34 years, he has helped people from all walks of life connect to their true selves by teaching them the science of meditation.

About Science of Spirituality:

Science of Spirituality is a global, non-profit, nondenominational organization dedicated to transforming lives through meditation. With over 3,200 centers in 50 countries, Science of Spirituality has helped millions of people worldwide find peace within themselves.

About Sant Rajinder Singh Ji Maharaj:

As head of Science of Spirituality, Sant Rajinder Singh Ji travels the globe, teaching people how they can uncover the treasures of spirituality within themselves with a practical technique of meditation for serenity and joy. He emphasizes that building a peaceful world begins with the first foundation stone—ourselves. We must find peace within ourselves before contributing to outer peace.

His tireless efforts have been recognized at the state, national, and global levels. He has received numerous awards and accolades in the spheres of spirituality, peace, and education. These include Honorary Doctorate Degrees from five prestigious universities. He is a bestselling author whose many books and publications have been translated into fifty-six languages. Some of the notable books include:

Detox the Mind

Meditation as Medication for the Soul

Inner and Outer Peace through Meditation

Empowering Your Soul through Meditation

For more information about Sant Rajinder Singh Ji, or Science of Spirituality:

elontario@sos.org, https://www.sos.org/ or call, +1 (647) 430 3335

29 Indian-Origin MPs Elected To UK Parliament

In a significant development for Indian-origin political representation, the UK Parliament is set to host historic 29 MPs of Indian descent after the 2024 general election. Labour has emerged as the predominant party among People of Indian Origin (PIO) MPs, winning 19 seats, marking a substantial rise compared to previous terms, according to a report by The Times of India.

New faces

Labour celebrated a significant win as they welcomed 12 new PIO MPs into their fold. Notable incumbents such as Lisa Nandy, Nadia Whittome, Navendu Mishra, Preet Gill, Valerie Vaz, and Seema Malhotra comfortably secured their seats. Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi retained Slough with a diminished majority, while Thangam Debbonaire conceded Bristol Central to the Green Party, underscoring intense competition even in traditionally Labour-dominated areas, the report said.

First time Labour MPs of Indian origin

They are Jas Athwal (Ilford South), Baggy Shanker (Derby South), Satvir Kaur (Southampton Test), Harpreet Uppal (Huddersfield), Warinder Juss (Wolverhampton West), Gurinder Josan (Smethwick), Kanishka Narayan (Vale of Glamorgan), Sonia Kumar (Dudley), Sureena Brackenbridge (Wolverhampton North East), Kirith Entwistle (Bolton North East), Jeevun Sandher (Loughborough) and Sojan Joseph (Ashford).

Indian-origin Labour MPs re-elected

Labour Party’s Seema Malhotra retained her Feltham and Heston seat, while Valerie Vaz won in Walsall and Bloxwich, and Lisa Nandy held on to her constituency of Wigan.

Preet Kaur Gill won from Birmingham Edgbaston and Tanmanjeet Singh was the winner in Slough. Navendu Mishra (Stockport) and Nadia Whittome (Nottingham East) were among the other Labour MPs re-elected.

Liberal Democrats and Independents of Indian-origin

The third-largest party in the UK Parliament too has some Indian-origin representation. Munira Wilson won back her Twickenham constituency for the Liberal Democrats.

Two Independent candidates with ancestral roots in India, Shockat Adam Patel (Leicester South) and Iqbal Mohamed (Dewsbury and Batley) registered decisive wins.

Conservative Party

The Conservative Party celebrated the addition of two new PIO MPs, while notable figures including Priti Patel, Rishi Sunak, Suella Braverman, Claire Coutinho, and Gagan Mohindra successfully defended their seats. Despite these victories, setbacks like Shailesh Vara’s loss in North West Cambridgeshire and Ranil Jayawardena’s defeat in Hampshire North East to the Liberal Democrats highlighted closely contested races within Conservative-held constituencies.

Alok Sharma and Virendra Sharma chose not to run for re-election, affecting the constituencies of Reading West and Ealing Southall, respectively. Deirdre Costigan won Ealing Southall decisively for the Labour Party.

Despite fielding 13 candidates from minor parties like the Green Party and Reform UK, none were successful in securing seats. Independent candidates such as Iqbal Mohamed and Shockat Adam saw notable success, highlighting the varied political aspirations within the PIO community.

The 2024 elections have established a new benchmark for PIO representation in British politics. Labour’s strong performance underscores evolving political dynamics and increasing community influence. The diverse group of PIO MPs now serving in the UK Parliament represents a significant stride towards greater diversity and inclusivity in parliamentary positions, the report stated.

In 2024, the UK has elected what is being described as the country’s most diverse Parliament with at least 87 ethnic minority candidates set to take their seats in the Commons

Sojan Joseph Elected to UK Parliament

Sojan Joseph, a mental health nurse in the National Health Service (NHS) who migrated from Kerala 22 years ago, is among the new crop of Labour members of Parliament elected to the House of Commons in the UK general election this week.

Joseph, 49, connected with the voters at the doorstep with his pledge to ensure more mental health services in his constituency and succeeded in making a dent in the Conservative stronghold of Ashford in Kent, south-eastern England.

Sojan Joseph ele3cted to UK P[ariliamnt (X) (1)Sojan Joseph has created history by becoming the first Labour MP for the Ashford constituency in Kent, UK. Joseph’s election comes as part of a sweeping victory for the Labour Party in the recent UK general elections, ending the Conservative Party’s 14-year rule.

Sojan Joseph, 49, was able to secure his position by defeating Conservative Party veteran Damien Green. This victory is particularly historic as Joseph is the first Labour candidate to win the Ashford seat in its 139-year history.

In defeating Tory stalwart and former minister Damian Green, Joseph also dealt a blow to the anti-immigration rhetoric of the right-wing candidates in a seat where the far-right Reform UK came in third place after the Tories.

Joseph expressed his gratitude in a post on X, following his election, “Thank you for the honour of being elected as the first Labour MP of Ashford constituency. I am humbled with the trust you all placed in me and fully aware of the responsibilities that come with it. I will work hard for everyone in Ashford, Hawkinge, and villages. Thank you to all in the Labour Family and the Campaign Team for their support.”

Joseph, who hails from Kaipuzha in Kerala’s Kottayam district, has lived in the UK since 2002, working as a mental health nurse in Kent’s National Health Service. His election to Parliament marks a significant achievement for the Indian-origin community in the UK, with 26 Indian-origin MPs now serving in the House of Commons.

The Labour Party, led by Keir Starmer, who is set to become the new Prime Minister, celebrated a landslide victory, marking the end of Rishi Sunak’s tenure as Prime Minister.

Back in Kerala, Joseph’s family celebrated the news with immense pride and joy. His father, KT Joseph, along with his sisters and other relatives, expressed their happiness and shared their excitement about his achievement. “I am very happy. A Malayalee went there and won. He calls home every day,” his father told the media. He lives in Kent with his wife, Brita, also a nurse from Kerala, and their three children.

Being a local councillor and a BAME (black, Asian and minority ethnic) Officer would have prepared the medical professional for this new parliamentary challenge. But it is his over two decades’ long NHS career as a mental health nurse that he feels gives him the empathy required for his new job in Parliament.

Also, his connect with the local communities of Ashford, where he has been living with his wife and three children for over 15 years, is his additional motivation.

29 Indian-origin MPs elected

Joseph joins 26 other Indian-origin MPs in the House of Commons, reflecting the growing influence of the Indian diaspora in UK politics.

Research Shows Divisions in the United States on the Role of Religion in Politics

(ZENIT News) A recent Pew Research Center Report reveals profound divisions between Joe Biden’s voters and Donald Trump’s regarding the role that religion should play in the government and politics of the United States. These differences reflect a significant fracture in the perception of the relationship between faith and politics in the country. Contrasting Views on Church-State Separation The Report shows that an overwhelming 86% of Biden voters believe that religion must be kept separate from governmental policy, whereas only 56% of Trump voters share this opinion. In contrast, 43% of Trump supporters opine that governmental policies should support religious values, compared with a mere 13% of Biden followers that agree with this idea.

At the general level, the majority of voters (71%) prefer that religion be kept separate from the government, with only 28% supporting the incorporation of religious values and beliefs in public policies. These numbers have change little in the last years, reflecting a stability in opinions on this topic. Bible ‘s Influence on Laws Opinions also differ considerably regarding the influence the Bible should have on American laws. The majority of Trump’s supporters (69%) believe the Bible should influence legislation, with 36% affirming that it should have “much” influence. On the other hand, 69% of Biden’s followers believe that the Bible should have little or no influence on laws, including 53% that hold it should have no influence at all. Diversity of Opinions According to Religious Affiliation The opinions also vary significantly according to religious affiliation and race. Among Trump voters, 61% of white Evangelicals believe that government policies should support religious values, compared with less than half non-Evangelical white Protestants and Catholics. In contrast, only 16% of Trump followers without religious affiliation agree with this governmental support to religion. Among Biden supporters, black Protestants are the most prone to believe that governmental policies should support religious values (39%), whereas only 7% of non-Evangelical white Protestants and a similar percentage of the non-affiliated religiously are in agreement.

Morality and Belief in God A related question is if it’s necessary to believe in God to be moral and have good values. In general, 67% of voters believe it isn’t necessary, whereas 33% think otherwise. However, among Trump voters, this opinion is more divided, with 45% believing in the necessity of faith for morality. In contrast, only 20% of Biden voters think that belief in God is essential to be moral. Impact of the 2024 Elections These divisions over religion and politics could play a crucial role in the forthcoming presidential election of 2024. The relationship between faith and government not only reflects profound ideological differences, but also how voters perceive the role of the government in the promotion of moral and religious values in American society. The Pew Research Center Report stresses the importance of understanding how religious beliefs influence public policies and how the latter can affect the electoral panorama in the United States. Thank you for reading our content. If you would like to receive ZENIT’s daily e-mail news, you can subscribe for free through this link.

(Research Shows Divisions in the United States on the Role of Religion in Politics | ZENIT – English)

Neha Joshi, Himani Shivpuri Showcase Their Saree Collections

Actors Neha Joshi and Himani Shivpuri have opened up on their enduring love for sarees and traditional attire, revealing the most precious possessions in their collections.

Neha and Himani shine in sarees that enhance their grace and charm, both on and off-screen.

Their wardrobes featuring luxurious Kanjeevarams and intricate Chikankari sarees reflect a deep connection with India’s rich textile heritage.

Neha, who plays Krishna Bihari Vajpayee in the show ‘Atal’, said: “Sarees have always held a special place in my wardrobe and heart. Recently, while promoting my show ‘Atal’ in Lucknow, I got myself one of the finest pieces of Chikankari cotton saree.”

“This exquisite saree, one of the most expensive in my collection, is a true testament to the artistry and heritage of Lucknow. Its delicate hand-embroidered patterns and soft cotton fabric felt like wearing a garment steeped in rich tradition. The saree is so special to me that I decided to keep it at my mother’s place in Nashik. As we both love to share our sarees, seeing her wear it brings me immense joy,” she added.

Himani, who plays Katori Amma in the sitcom ‘Happu Ki Ultan Paltan’, said: “The most precious possession in my collection of sarees is my red Banarasi saree which I purchased during a memorable visit to Varanasi. The rich, radiant silk and intricate zari work make each Banarasi saree a masterpiece.”

“Owning one is like having a piece of art, a celebration of our culture and the incredible craftsmanship passed down through generations. This Banarasi saree symbolises my deep respect for our country’s cultural richness and my love for traditional Indian attire,” added the senior actress. (IANS)

Indian Consulate Launches Platform For Students To Find Internship Opportunities In USA

The Indian Consulate in New York has launched a new initiative aimed at helping Indian students by offering a dedicated platform to access internship opportunities at various companies throughout the United States.

Taking to X, the Indian mission said, “As part of the initiative to support Indian students in its jurisdiction, India in

 New York has developed a platform for Indian Students to find internship opportunities at companies in the USA.”

As part of the initiative to support Indian students in it’s jurisdiction, @IndiainNew York has developed a platform for Indian Students to find internship opportunities at companies in the USA. Details may be see in the image below Link – https://indiainnewyork.gov.in/job/index

This new facility is part of the consulate’s efforts to support Indian students within its jurisdiction. Several Indian and American companies and organizations have agreed to consider deserving Indian students for internship opportunities.

The consulate advised students to apply directly to the companies using the details provided on the portal. They noted that the consulate has no role in the selection process for internships and is not responsible for the same.

The portal features numerous fields, including investment banking, healthcare, IT, finance, software engineering, and others.

This platform aims to bridge the gap between Indian students and potential internship providers, offering a valuable resource for career development. It is set to enhance opportunities for Indian students seeking valuable work experience in their fields.

The students can apply for internships through this portal: https://www.indiainnewyork.gov.in/job/index

India’s Democratic Decline: Erosion of Institutions, Free Speech Suppression, and Rising Authoritarianism

India, the world’s largest democracy, has been regarded as a beacon of hope in the developing world. However, recent years have seen significant challenges to its democratic fabric, causing global concern. Various indicators suggest a troubling decline in India’s democratic health, with notable falls in several key freedom indices.

Erosion of Democratic Institutions

The degradation of India’s democratic institutions has been substantial. The judiciary, traditionally a pillar of Indian democracy, has faced political interference, particularly in the appointment of judges. In an unprecedented move in 2018, four senior Supreme Court judges held a press conference to voice their concerns about the court’s functioning, particularly the allocation of cases to judges with less seniority. This event highlighted deep-seated issues within the judiciary.

Similarly, the Election Commission of India (ECI), responsible for overseeing elections, has been criticized for perceived biases. Allegations emerged during the 2019 general election that the ECI favored the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Moreover, the handling of electronic voting machines (EVMs) has been contentious, with security and tampering concerns leading to widespread distrust.

Restrictions on Free Speech and Media Freedom

Free speech and media freedom, crucial indicators of a healthy democracy, have faced increasing restrictions. Laws like the sedition law and the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) have been used to suppress dissent and silence critics. Journalists critical of the government have faced harassment, intimidation, and even arrest on dubious charges.

The government introduced new rules for social media platforms in 2021, demanding the removal of “unlawful” content within 36 hours and identifying the “first originator” of messages deemed a threat to national security. Critics argue these rules could stifle dissent and severely undermine free speech.

Discrimination and Violence Against Minorities

India has seen a disturbing rise in discrimination and violence against minorities, tarnishing its rich cultural heritage of diversity. Religious minorities, especially Muslims, have faced significant violence. In 2019, a Muslim man in Jharkhand was attacked by a mob for allegedly transporting beef and subsequently died from his injuries. Numerous incidents of lynching of Muslims accused of cow slaughter or beef consumption have been reported.

The government’s treatment of other minorities, such as Dalits and Adivasis, has also drawn criticism. Dalits, historically subjected to discrimination, have faced violence for asserting their rights, like entering temples or inter-caste marriages. Adivasis have been displaced and faced violence due to policies favoring industrialization. These incidents indicate a violation of pluralistic principles, which are fundamental to a democratic polity.

Rise of Authoritarianism

The rise of authoritarianism under the BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi is a significant concern. The government’s actions, such as the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir and the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), reflect efforts to consolidate power at the expense of democratic norms.

Opposition leaders and critics have been targeted using state power. In 2020, opposition figures like former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and former West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharya were placed under house arrest. Activists and academics critical of the government have been arrested under the UAPA, seen as a tool to silence dissent. These actions signify a troubling shift towards authoritarianism.

Global Reputation: A Waning Democratic Credibility

India’s backsliding democracy has raised alarms internationally. Freedom House has downgraded India from “free” to “partly free,” citing declines in political rights and civil liberties. The Human Freedom Index and the Press Freedom Index also highlight the deteriorating state of democratic freedoms in India.

International human rights organizations and some Western governments have criticized India’s democratic backsliding. However, geopolitical considerations, particularly India’s role in countering China’s influence in the Indo-Pacific, often temper these criticisms.

Defending Democracy

Addressing these democratic challenges is crucial for India’s future. Ensuring the independence of the judiciary, protecting free speech and media freedom, and promoting equality and justice for all citizens are vital steps. Civil society, opposition parties, and the international community must hold the government accountable and advocate for the preservation of democratic values.

India must take these steps to restore its status as a beacon of democracy in the developing world. As a former Supreme Court judge remarked, “The strength of a democracy is measured not just by the vibrancy of its institutions but also by the respect it commands in protecting the rights and freedoms of its people.” Only through such measures can India continue to inspire and lead by example in the realm of democratic governance.

Kamala Harris Emerges as Potential Democratic Candidate for 2024 Amid Rising Support and Republican Concerns

Vice President Kamala Harris has captured the attention of Republican donors, holds significant name recognition, and is gaining support from influential Democratic Party figures. Should President Joe Biden step aside from the 2024 election, Harris would be the natural successor, according to top Democrats. This raises a crucial question: Does Harris have a better chance than Biden of defeating Donald Trump? Despite Biden’s insistence on staying in the race, discussions about Harris’s potential candidacy are intensifying.

If Harris were to become the party’s nominee and win the November 5 election, she would be the first woman president of the United States, and the first African American and Asian individual to serve as vice president. Her tenure in the White House over the past three and a half years has been marked by a slow start, significant staff turnover, and challenging early assignments, such as addressing Central American migration, which did not yield major successes.

As recently as last year, concerns within the White House and Biden’s campaign team regarding Harris’s potential liability to the campaign were prevalent. However, her recent efforts on abortion rights and engagement with young voters have significantly altered this perception among Democratic officials.

The Biden-Harris campaign expressed, “She is proud to be his running mate and looks forward to serving at his side for four more years.” Recent polls indicate that Harris might have an edge over Biden in a potential matchup against Trump. A CNN poll released on July 2 showed Trump leading Biden by six percentage points (49% to 43%), while Harris trailed Trump by a narrower margin of 47% to 45%, within the margin of error. The poll also revealed that independents favor Harris over Trump (43% to 40%) and that moderate voters prefer her 51% to 39%.

Another poll by Reuters/Ipsos following a debate between Trump and a struggling Biden showed Harris and Trump nearly tied, with 42% supporting Harris and 43% backing Trump. Among possible alternatives to Biden, only former First Lady Michelle Obama, who has shown no interest in running, polled higher. Internal polling from the Biden campaign indicated that Harris has similar odds as Biden of beating Trump, with 45% of voters supporting her compared to 48% for Trump.

Several influential Democrats have signaled their support for Harris as the best option if Biden steps aside. These include U.S. Representative Jim Clyburn, a key figure in Biden’s 2020 victory; Rep. Gregory Meeks, a senior member of the Congressional Black Caucus; and Summer Lee, a House Democrat from Pennsylvania. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has also reportedly indicated support for Harris in private discussions.

Republican donors are taking Harris seriously, with some preferring Trump to face Biden rather than her. Pauline Lee, a Trump fundraiser in Nevada, stated, “I would prefer Biden to stay in place,” and criticized Biden as “incompetent.” Wall Street, a crucial Democratic fundraising hub, is also beginning to show a preference for Harris. Sonu Varghese, global macro strategist at Carson Group, remarked, “Biden is already behind Trump, and is unlikely to overcome that gap given where his campaign is currently. Having VP Harris likely improves Democrats’ odds of taking the White House.”

However, a majority of Americans view Harris negatively, similar to their perceptions of Biden and Trump. Polling data from Five Thirty Eight shows 37.1% of voters approve of Harris while 49.6% disapprove, compared to Biden’s 36.9% approval and 57.1% disapproval, and Trump’s 38.6% approval and 53.6% disapproval.

Since the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to repeal the constitutional right to abortion, Harris has become the administration’s leading voice on reproductive rights. This issue is central to the Democrats’ strategy for the 2024 election. Harris could invigorate key Democratic-leaning groups whose enthusiasm for Biden has waned, including Black voters, young voters, and those dissatisfied with Biden’s handling of the Israel-Hamas conflict. Tim Ryan, a former Democratic Congressman from Ohio, wrote, “She would energize the Black, brown, and Asian Pacific members of our coalition…she would immediately pull the dispirited youth of our country back into the fold.”

Harris’s stance on Israel is aligned with Biden’s, though she was the first senior U.S. leader to call for a ceasefire in March. Abbas Alawieh of the “Uncommitted” movement, which withheld votes for Biden over his support for Israel, stated, “Simply swapping out the candidate does not address the central concern.”

If Biden steps aside, other Democrats might compete for the nomination. However, choosing another candidate over Harris could alienate Black voters, crucial to Biden’s 2020 victory. Adrianne Shropshire, executive director of BlackPAC, asserted, “There is no alternative besides Kamala Harris…Jump over the Black woman, the vice president, and I don’t think the Democratic Party actually recovers.”

Harris may struggle to win over moderate Democrats and independent voters who favor Biden’s centrist policies. Dmitri Mehlhorn, adviser to LinkedIn co-founder and Democratic megadonor Reid Hoffman, noted, “Her greatest weakness is that her public brand has been associated with the far-left wing of the Democratic Party…and the left wing cannot win a national election.”

Harris would inherit Biden’s campaign infrastructure and funds, a crucial advantage with only four months until election day. However, Democratic strategists emphasize the need to raise hundreds of millions more dollars. A Democratic National Committee source remarked, “I can tell you we have a really tough time raising money for her.”

During the 2020 presidential race, Harris lagged behind Biden in fundraising, dropping out in December 2019 after reporting $39.3 million in total contributions compared to Biden’s $60.9 million. However, Biden’s campaign raised a record $48 million in 24 hours after naming Harris as his running mate.

Some Democrats believe Harris’s prosecutorial background could shine in a debate against Trump. Mehlhorn commented, “She is incredibly focused and forceful and smart, and if she prosecutes the case against the criminality of Donald Trump, she will rip him apart.”

Republican attacks on Harris are increasing as she is considered a possible replacement for Biden. Conservative media are reviving criticism from the 2020 race, including claims that she laughs too much and is untested and unqualified. The New York Post, owned by News Corp, ran a column titled “America may soon be subjected to the country’s first DEI president: Kamala Harris,” criticizing her rise due to the party’s diversity initiatives.

Kelly Dittmar, a political science professor at Rutgers University, said, “Unfortunately, the reliance on both racist and sexist attacks and tropes against women running for office is historically common and persists to this day.”

French Left Vows to Govern Amid Political Gridlock Following Election Result

The French left has declared its intent to govern but acknowledged on Monday that negotiations would be challenging and protracted after Sunday’s election halted the far-right’s pursuit of power and resulted in a hung parliament.

Many of France’s allies felt relieved after Marine Le Pen’s National Rally (RN) failed to secure victory in the snap election called by President Emmanuel Macron.

However, with the leftist New Popular Front (NFP) alliance, which was hastily formed before the election, unexpectedly emerging first but far from achieving an absolute majority, the election signaled a period of instability and potential gridlock.

“It’s not going to be simple, no, it’s not going to be easy, and no, it’s not going to be comfortable,” stated Green party leader Marine Tondelier. “It’s going to take a bit of time.”

Potential outcomes include the left forming a minority government, which would be vulnerable to no-confidence votes unless deals are struck, or creating a cumbersome coalition of parties with little common ground.

“We’ll need some time,” NFP lawmaker Pouria Amirshahi told Reuters as newly elected lawmakers arrived in parliament to collect their badges and settle in, noting that any option would be complex.

The NFP lacks a single leader and, with an estimated 182 MPs, falls significantly short of the 289 needed for an absolute majority. No other group holds a majority either. Macron’s centrists came in second, and the RN third, leaving the parliament divided into three factions.

“The President of the Republic must call on us to run the government, to respect the outcome of the election,” Manuel Bompard of the hard-left France Unbowed said before a meeting with the Socialists, Greens, and Communists to decide on the NFP’s strategy.

For Le Pen’s RN, the outcome was disappointing as opinion polls had predicted a victory for weeks. Despite increasing their number of MPs by more than 50 to 143, RN lawmaker Laurent Jacobelli told Reuters it fell short of expectations.

RN leader Jordan Bardella admitted the party had made mistakes, including in candidate selection, but assured that Sunday’s ballot had sown the seeds for the far-right’s future success.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Gabriel Attal, a centrist and Macron ally, offered his resignation, but Macron asked him to remain temporarily “to ensure the country’s stability,” according to the president’s office.

Weakened France?

A fragmented parliament will complicate pushing through a domestic agenda and is likely to weaken France’s role within the European Union and beyond.

“The most immediate risk is a financial crisis and France’s economic decline,” warned current finance minister Bruno Le Maire.

Despite the uncertainty, some voters welcomed the tripartite parliament.

“I think it’s great to have a diverse assembly like this, with roughly equal groupings. They will have to get along,” Valerie, who works in luxury, said in Paris.

However, Jean-Eudes du Mesnil, of the CPME small and medium businesses union, expressed concern about the NFP’s proposed policies.

“We’ll see whether they’re applied or not, but there are certain measures that are simply unthinkable,” he said, including a significant minimum wage increase.

The left appeared divided on whether to seek support from other factions, such as Macron’s centrists.

Olivier Faure, the Socialist leader, told France Info radio he expected the parties to agree on a plan this week but avoided answering whether the NFP would negotiate with Macron’s camp.

France Unbowed’s divisive leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon has ruled out any deal with centrists.

However, the left-wing bloc, whose main proposals include reversing Macron’s pension reform and capping key goods prices, will need to reach agreements with lawmakers outside their bloc to govern effectively.

Macron Eclipsed

The NFP’s program, which if implemented, would likely strain France’s public finances further, was viewed negatively by financial markets before the election.

The euro fell by as much as 0.4% on Monday as investors considered the uncertainty.

Some prominent centrists expressed willingness to work on a pact but refused to collaborate with France Unbowed, which many French centrists view as extreme as the RN.

Macron, whose term ends in 2027, now seems unlikely to drive policy again, although he had already implemented much of his agenda, including increasing the pension age—a move that sparked street protests—and a contentious immigration bill.

With 32.05% of the votes, the RN received more support than any other single party on Sunday, but alliances, tactical voting, and its own mistakes prevented it from winning.

Adélaïde Zulfikarpasic of BVA Xsight pollsters questioned the RN’s preparedness and noted that some voters still found it “a little scary.”

In Boulogne-sur-Mer, northern France, 61-year-old retired fisherman Denis Dewet, drawing parallels with presidential elections, said: “It’s because France doesn’t like the extremes.”

Archaeologists Unearth 1,500-Year-Old Ivory Box with Christian Motifs in Southern Austria

A team of archaeologists from the University of Innsbruck made a remarkable find while excavating a church site in southern Austria. They uncovered a marble shrine containing a 1,500-year-old ivory box decorated with Christian motifs. This relic, believed to be linked to Moses receiving the Ten Commandments, is considered highly significant due to the rarity of early Christian sacred objects.

“We know of around 40 ivory boxes of this kind worldwide and, as far as I know, the last time one of these was found during excavations was around 100 years ago—the few pyxes that exist are either preserved in cathedral treasures or exhibited in museums,” explains the finder, archaeologist Gerald Grabherr.

“The pyx was presumably also seen as sacred and was treated as such because it was in contact with a relic. The archaeological and art-historical significance of the pyx cannot be denied,” emphasises Gerald Grabherr.

The intricately carved box was discovered under an altar inside a chapel located at the summit of Burgbichl, a small hill in the municipality of Irschen. The University of Innsbruck has been conducting excavations in this area, part of the Carinthian Drava Valley, since 2016.

“This is the typical depiction of the handing over of the laws to Moses on Mount Sinai, the beginning of the covenant between God and man from the Old Testament,” says Gerald Grabherr.

Towards the end of the Roman Empire, times became more uncertain, especially in the peripheral provinces of the empire, including the area that is now Austria. For this reason, from around the 4th century, the inhabitants increasingly founded settlements on hilltops that were easier to defend and left the valley floor.

Biden’s Age and Stubbornness: Key Takeaways from His ABC Interview

Democrats have been deeply concerned about President Biden’s candidacy and his ability to defeat Donald Trump following his poor debate performance last week.

To address these concerns, Biden sat for an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on Friday night.

Whether the interview alleviated these concerns will become clearer in the coming days. Here are six key takeaways from the interview:

  1. Biden’s Performance and Age

Biden’s performance in the interview was better than in the debate, but his age is increasingly apparent. While he may have reassured some political allies, he did not display the clarity and coherence that Democrats hoped for. His thoughts were occasionally scattered and unclear.

“I just had a bad night,” Biden explained regarding the debate. “I don’t know why.” He mentioned that he had been traveling, had a cold, and had even tested for COVID.

The critical question is whether Democratic officials and persuadable voters will accept this explanation and believe he is capable of another term. Biden asserts he is fit for the job, but his age is becoming more noticeable at a crucial time. Before the debate, expectations were low. Biden only needed to show some energy and vigor, but he failed to do so. Now, expectations are higher, and every public appearance, speech, and debate will be scrutinized.

  1. Biden’s Stubbornness

Biden reaffirmed that he is not withdrawing from the race, asserting that no one else could do the job as well or be a better candidate against Trump.

Biden dismissed questions about his political standing and doubts about his ability to lead or defeat Trump. “I’ve seen it from the press,” he said. “I don’t think the vast majority are there. I don’t believe that’s my approval rating.”

Understanding Biden’s refusal to step aside requires understanding his politics and personal resilience. He has faced numerous challenges both personally and politically, which have shaped him. Biden is accustomed to people doubting him, and he believes these naysayers have been wrong for a long time.

However, these challenges differ from his current one because, as the saying goes, Father Time is undefeated.

Historian Douglas Brinkley once said of former President George W. Bush, “Stubbornness is a positive quality of presidential leadership—if you’re right about what you’re stubborn about.” This sentiment applies to Biden or any president.

  1. The Role of Biden’s Closest Allies

Biden stated that only a divine intervention could force him out of the race — or possibly his closest allies in Democratic leadership.

“If the Lord Almighty came down and said, ‘Joe, get out of the race,’ I’d get out of the race,” Biden said. “The Lord Almighty’s not coming down.”

While divine intervention is unlikely, Biden seemed to leave open the possibility of exiting if key congressional allies, such as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Jim Clyburn, and Senate leader Chuck Schumer, advised him to do so.

None of these allies have called for him to drop out. However, Pelosi recently acknowledged that it is legitimate to question whether Biden’s debate performance was an “episode” or a “condition.”

Stephanopoulos asked Biden, “If you are told reliably from your allies, from your friends and supporters in the Democratic Party in the House and Senate, that they’re concerned you’re going to lose the House and the Senate if you stay in, what will you do?”

Biden responded, “I’m not going to answer that question. It’s not going to happen.”

Thus, Biden’s future in the race is not solely his decision.

  1. Questions About Vice President Harris

Biden contended, “I don’t think anybody’s more qualified to be president or win this race than me.”

He later questioned who else has the “reach” with allies and can handle foreign policy as well as he can, despite his diminished capacity compared to a few years ago.

Stephanopoulos did not follow up on whether Biden believes Vice President Harris could win or do the job as well. Biden’s remarks raise questions about his confidence in Harris. Despite Biden’s public displays of support for Harris, such as raising her arm at a Fourth of July event, the doubts about his age make it worth considering whether he implicitly lacks confidence in Harris’s ability to win or govern.

  1. Biden’s Resilience and Self-Belief

Biden’s steadfast belief in his capabilities stems from a lifetime of overcoming obstacles. He has faced significant personal and political challenges, and his resilience has been a defining characteristic. This tenacity is evident in his refusal to step aside despite concerns about his age and performance.

Throughout his career, Biden has been told he couldn’t or shouldn’t do something, and he has consistently proved the doubters wrong. This deep-seated belief in his own resilience and abilities is a core part of who he is as a politician and person.

  1. The Impact on the Democratic Party

Biden’s decision to remain in the race has significant implications for the Democratic Party. His performance and public appearances will be closely scrutinized, and any perceived weaknesses could impact the party’s prospects in the upcoming elections.

The concerns about Biden’s age and performance are not just about his candidacy but also about the broader implications for the Democratic Party. If Biden’s campaign falters, it could have ripple effects on down-ballot races, potentially affecting the party’s control of the House and Senate.

Biden’s interview with Stephanopoulos highlighted key aspects of his candidacy: his age and performance issues, his stubbornness and resilience, the role of his closest allies, and the implications for the Democratic Party. Whether this interview will quell concerns about his candidacy remains to be seen, but it underscores the critical challenges he faces as he seeks another term in office.

Reformist Masoud Pezeshkian Wins Iranian Presidency Amid Low Voter Turnout and Calls for Change

Reformist Masoud Pezeshkian has emerged as Iran’s new president, defeating his hardline conservative opponent Saeed Jalili. The election results, declared in favor of Dr. Pezeshkian, showed he garnered 53.3% of the more than 30 million votes counted, while Mr. Jalili received 44.3%.

This election followed a run-off necessitated by the absence of a majority winner in the initial round held on June 28, which saw a historically low voter turnout of 40%. The election was triggered by the tragic death of Iran’s former president Ebrahim Raisi in a helicopter crash in May, which also claimed the lives of seven others.

World leaders from China, India, and Russia have extended their congratulations to Dr. Pezeshkian on his victory. Even before the official results were announced by Iran’s interior ministry, jubilant supporters of Dr. Pezeshkian took to the streets in Tehran and other cities. Social media videos showed young people dancing and waving his campaign’s green flag, while passing cars honked in celebration.

Dr. Pezeshkian, a 71-year-old heart surgeon and parliamentary member, is known for his critical stance against Iran’s morality police. He stirred public attention by advocating for “unity and cohesion” and promising an end to Iran’s “isolation” from the international community. He has also championed “constructive negotiations” with Western powers to revive the struggling 2015 nuclear deal, which involves Iran limiting its nuclear program in exchange for relief from Western sanctions.

In contrast, Saeed Jalili, a former nuclear negotiator, is a proponent of maintaining the status quo. Mr. Jalili, who enjoys robust support from Iran’s most devout communities, is known for his staunch anti-Western views and opposition to renewing the nuclear deal, which he believes infringes on Iran’s “red lines.”

Voter turnout in the latest round of voting was 50%, an increase from the first round’s record low since the 1979 Islamic revolution, reflecting widespread discontent. This discontent led millions to boycott the elections, citing limited candidate choices dominated by hardliners and the belief that substantial change is impossible under the tightly controlled policies of the supreme leader.

Some Iranians who abstained from voting in the first round decided to vote for Dr. Pezeshkian in the run-off to prevent Mr. Jalili from becoming president. They feared that a victory for Mr. Jalili would lead to increased international confrontation, additional sanctions, and further isolation for Iran.

Both candidates had to pass a rigorous vetting process by the Guardian Council, a 12-member body of clerics and jurists wielding significant influence in Iran. This process disqualified 74 other candidates, including several women. The Guardian Council has faced criticism from human rights organizations for barring candidates deemed insufficiently loyal to the regime.

Years of civil unrest, climaxing in anti-regime protests during 2022-23, have fostered deep mistrust of the establishment among many young and middle-class Iranians, resulting in previous electoral boycotts. On Iranian social media, the Persian hashtag “traitorous minority” gained traction, urging people to abstain from voting for either candidate and branding those who did as “traitors.”

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dismissed claims that low voter turnout indicated a rejection of his rule. “There are reasons [behind the low turnout] and politicians and sociologists will examine them, but if anyone thinks that those who did not vote are against the establishment, they are plainly wrong,” he stated.

In an unusual acknowledgment, Mr. Khamenei admitted that some Iranians do not support the current regime. “We listen to them and we know what they are saying and it is not like they are hidden and not seen,” he said.

President Biden Faces Mounting Pressure Amid Health Concerns and Debate Fallout

President Joe Biden is facing a challenging struggle to affirm his strength and cognitive capacity for a second term, a personal and national ordeal that has become increasingly agonizing. His recent appearance on primetime television, where he candidly addressed questions about his health, felt like a breach of presidential dignity, exposing his vulnerability to the public eye. Despite his respected status among many Americans, witnessing Biden confront the harsh realities of aging so publicly evokes empathy.

Biden’s recent presidential debate performance, marked by moments of incoherence, has sparked significant concern and forced a national dialogue about his fitness for reelection. Although his interview following the debate showcased a more composed demeanor compared to the debate itself, it did little to dispel mounting doubts about his health and the stability of his Democratic support base. The growing pressure within his party suggests a potential crisis, with calls from Democratic leaders for Biden to step aside in favor of a younger candidate intensifying.

During his interview with ABC News, Biden aimed to refute criticisms stemming from his debate performance and solidify his position as the Democratic nominee for 2024. He presented a robust defense of his presidency and dismissed concerns about his health, asserting his readiness to continue his campaign despite calls for him to reconsider. Biden emphasized his longstanding commitment to resilience in the face of adversity, a stance that complicates the Democratic Party’s internal deliberations.

Despite Biden’s insistence that his health remains intact, questions persist about his ability to withstand the rigors of another term. His admission of feeling “terrible” before the debate, coupled with moments of uncertainty during the interview, only heightened anxieties about his physical and mental stamina. Concerns over his age and capacity to effectively serve as president have become focal points in discussions about his candidacy.

The interview highlighted Biden’s defensive posture against criticisms of his debate performance and polling trends indicating a decline in his national and swing state support. Democratic leaders, increasingly anxious about the implications for the upcoming election, have urged Biden to engage more directly with the public to demonstrate his vitality and capability to lead.

Amidst the debate over Biden’s candidacy, supporters argue that his accomplishments in office and the imperative to counter Trump’s potential reelection outweigh concerns about his age and performance. They contend that Biden’s experience and policy achievements should not be overshadowed by a single debate performance, emphasizing the stakes of the upcoming election and the broader implications for American democracy.

However, the persistent doubts about Biden’s ability to navigate another term in office have cast a shadow over discussions about his candidacy. Critics within the Democratic Party assert that while Biden has made significant contributions during his tenure, his continued candidacy risks jeopardizing the party’s prospects in November. They argue for a leadership transition that reflects the changing dynamics of American politics and addresses the challenges posed by Trump’s reelection campaign.

As Biden continues to confront skepticism about his candidacy, he remains steadfast in his determination to highlight his administration’s achievements and combat doubts about his capacity to lead. His efforts to redirect attention towards his policy agenda underscore his commitment to advancing his campaign despite the formidable challenges he faces.

In conclusion, Biden’s struggle to affirm his candidacy for a second term reflects broader anxieties within the Democratic Party about his ability to effectively compete against Trump. The debate over his health and fitness for office underscores the complexity of his reelection bid and the competing perspectives within his party regarding the path forward.

Conservative Party Faces Soul-Searching After Election Upset: Leadership Change Looms Amidst Internal Divisions and Strategic Missteps

The Conservative Party had long been likened to the dominant force of Manchester City in politics, a winning machine so entrenched that its key figures could scarcely recall anything else. However, their streak, which had ushered in Tory prime ministers through four consecutive elections, has now abruptly ended. The aftermath has left many Tories, whether victorious or defeated, almost speechless and grappling to come to terms with the outcome. As one insider put it, they were simply “not coherent.”

A critical analysis of their strategies and leadership missteps, and the path forward, has commenced in earnest. In conversations with Conservative figures, recurring themes emerge. While some believe Labour’s policies weren’t markedly different from their own, they acknowledge that voter perception of “competence” became decisive. The party has witnessed a rapid turnover of five leaders, and thus prime ministers, in under a decade. The seismic impact of events like Brexit, Covid-19, and multiple leadership contests has fractured the party into ideological factions. Internal conflicts often took precedence over confronting external challenges, resulting in unresolved divisions.

The Conservative Party weathered scandals in quick succession, ranging from lockdown breaches to allegations of misconduct, compounded by fiscal decisions that led to interest rate hikes. An election betting controversy added to their woes. When asked during the campaign about the party’s conduct issues, former Chief Whip Sir Mark Spencer pointed out that other parties also faced suspensions for misconduct, though he conceded that these incidents had become too frequent.

The call for change resonated strongly in Labour’s campaign, drawing attention to concerns over the cost of living, NHS wait times, and immigration policies. Nigel Farage’s resurgence injected new dynamics into the election, exacerbating tensions among right-leaning voters who defected to Reform UK. Attempts to court these voters strained relations with centrist Tories who subsequently shifted allegiance to Labour or the Liberal Democrats, leaving the Conservatives caught in the middle.

Despite these challenges, was defeat inevitable? Most Tories I’ve spoken to describe the outcome as “not unexpected,” although some feel the extent of the loss could have been mitigated. Avoidable missteps, such as Rishi Sunak’s early departure from D-day commemorations, added to the setbacks. While Boris Johnson’s charisma continued to rally support, some supporters felt Sunak lacked a similar appeal. Questions lingered over the timing of the election called by Sunak in July, against advice for a later date to allow policies to yield tangible results.

Isaac Levido, their campaign strategist, argued unsuccessfully for delaying the election, anticipating concrete outcomes like asylum seeker returns or interest rate cuts to bolster their case. Critics of his strategy warned of potential future setbacks, such as increased Channel crossings or prison overcrowding issues. The focus now shifts to the party’s identity and policy direction as they embark on a soul-searching journey.

Looking ahead, Rishi Sunak has confirmed his intention to step down once a succession plan is in place. Discussions about appointing an interim leader to avoid awkward parliamentary scenarios are underway. Names like Sir Oliver Dowden, James Cleverly, or Jeremy Hunt have been floated, with speculation about their willingness to assume the leadership permanently.

Behind the scenes, MPs are maneuvering to consolidate support, including figures like Kemi Badenoch and Tom Tugendhat, who represent different wings of the party. Former contenders Suella Braverman and Robert Jenrick are also expected to enter the fray, each critiquing the government’s stance on immigration during their tenure in the Home Office.

The composition of the remaining Tory MPs will influence the leadership contest, reflecting divisions within the party. Supporters of Sunak and Liz Truss dominate the new intake, while figures like Braverman and Badenoch have seen a decline in backing from their traditional supporters on the right. This demographic shift will play a pivotal role in shaping the party’s future trajectory.

The Tories face a critical juncture in determining their ideological direction. Will they pivot towards a more right-wing agenda to counter Reform UK’s influence, or attempt to reclaim centrist ground with candidates like Tugendhat or Hunt? These deliberations will shape the party’s evolution in the weeks and months ahead, marked by intense internal debate and reflection.

Keir Starmer Assumes UK Premiership Amidst Labour’s Landslide Victory: A Vision for Progressive Realism and Stronger Global Ties

Keir Starmer, leader of the Labour Party, has assumed the role of Britain’s Prime Minister, displacing Rishi Sunak following a decisive electoral defeat for the Conservatives. As Labour returns to power after an absence since 2010, the initial phase of Starmer’s premiership will be marked by intensive international engagements. These include anticipated meetings with US President Joe Biden and various European leaders.

According to David Lammy, the prospective foreign secretary, Labour aims to adopt a foreign policy of “progressive realism,” acknowledging the world’s volatility “as it is, not as we wish it to be.” This stance underscores Labour’s intention to navigate international affairs with pragmatism and foresight.

Labour’s agenda also prioritizes ensuring the success of Brexit and pursuing an ambitious security pact with the European Union. Starmer’s vision extends to enhancing UK-India relations, acknowledging historical challenges such as Labour’s past positions on issues like Kashmir. He has committed to forging a new strategic partnership with India, emphasizing initiatives such as a free trade agreement (FTA) and expanded cooperation in technology, security, education, and climate change. These efforts aim to elevate ties with one of the world’s fastest-growing economies.

In his manifesto, Starmer outlined plans for a “new strategic partnership” with India, focusing prominently on trade agreements and bilateral cooperation. To address domestic concerns and garner support from the British-Indian community, Starmer has engaged in outreach efforts during his campaign. These include condemning Hinduphobia and participating in cultural celebrations like Diwali and Holi, aimed at fostering inclusivity and trust within this crucial demographic for Labour’s electoral prospects.

However, challenges lie ahead in realizing Starmer’s ambitious foreign policy objectives, particularly concerning immigration policies and trade negotiations. Amidst bipartisan consensus on the need to curb immigration, Labour faces delicate negotiations regarding temporary visas for Indian workers in the UK service sector.

Rishi Sunak’s Conservative Party attempted a last-minute appeal to voters, warning of potential tax increases under Labour’s leadership. Despite these efforts, Labour has secured a commanding lead with 403 seats, compared to the Conservatives’ 109 seats in the 650-member House of Commons. Winning 326 seats is required for a parliamentary majority.

U.S. Housing Market Crisis Looms Large as Economic Drag Ahead of 2024 Election

To paraphrase the article while including the original quotes and maintaining the content integrity within approximately 1000 words:

The U.S. housing market, grappling with elevated interest rates and sluggish sales, is poised to exert significant drag on the economy leading up to the upcoming election.

Recent reports paint a grim picture of a housing sector that once held promise as a substantial contributor to the economy, constituting up to 18 percent of it. Existing home sales have declined, and pending sales have plummeted to unprecedented lows. May’s housing starts have hit their lowest point since June 2020, coinciding with the pandemic-induced economic slowdown. Amid the highest borrowing costs seen in over two decades, residential investment has sharply decreased.

Lawrence Yun, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors, highlighted the severity of the situation, noting, “Home sales activity is at a 30-year low — it’s essentially stuck at that level, so all of the economic activity associated with home sales is at a depressed level.”

Initially optimistic at the start of the year, market expectations were for the Federal Reserve to begin cutting interest rates as inflation subsided. However, this expectation has not materialized, keeping the Fed’s rates elevated and thereby increasing the costs of construction and financing for home purchases.

Simultaneously, soaring home prices due to a nationwide supply shortage have barred many prospective first-time buyers from entering the market. Surveys indicate that the escalating housing costs rank among the top concerns for young voters, with over 90 percent identifying affordability as a pivotal factor influencing their voting decisions this year. This issue is not confined to the U.S. alone; other affluent democracies such as the U.K., France, and Canada are also contending with housing affordability as a pressing political issue.

The Biden administration has faced challenges in addressing this crisis, with significant barriers to new housing development predominantly arising at the local and state levels.

Daryl Fairweather, chief economist at Redfin, emphasized the unprecedented nature of the current housing dilemma, stating, “It’s unprecedented, it’s never been such an issue. I think this is the first time housing could actually matter in the swing states — before it was mostly in the coastal areas.” Fairweather underscored President Biden’s acknowledgment of housing costs in his debate with former President Trump, highlighting its newfound prominence in national discourse.

Residential investment, which accounts for a substantial portion of the GDP, could diminish by up to 5 percent as a result of declining spending in this sector, further exacerbating economic slowdown amidst already tepid consumer spending.

Although housing inventory is showing slight signs of increase, it remains insufficient to meet demand, exacerbated by a prolonged supply shortage dating back several years. This shortage is compounded by homeowners opting to retain their 3 percent mortgages secured in 2020 rather than refinancing at current rates nearing 6.9 percent, creating what Fairweather termed as a “mortgage rate lock-in effect.”

Fairweather cautioned against expecting a quick resolution to the housing market’s challenges, suggesting, “I don’t think that the problems with the housing market are going to clear up in a matter of years. It could take a decade.”

Acknowledging that many of the barriers driving up housing costs are localized, the White House announced initiatives in June. The Department of Housing and Urban Development plans to allocate $85 million in grants to help local governments identify and eliminate obstacles to affordable housing production and preservation. Additionally, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced a $100 million allocation over three years to support affordable housing production through the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund.

These measures represent the latest attempts by the Biden administration to tackle the affordability crisis exacerbated by housing shortages following years of below-average construction rates in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. As of April, home prices in the 20 largest U.S. metro areas reached record highs according to the Case-Shiller home price index, contributing to increased official inflation indexes and raising concerns among voters already grappling with the highest inflation rates in four decades.

Despite the record highs in home prices, there are signs that the pace of price growth is moderating, suggesting a more stable market compared to the unsustainable growth observed in 2022, according to Zillow senior economist Orphe Divounguy. Divounguy noted, “Today I think we’re in a much better place than we were in 2022, when prices were growing unsustainably. That overheated pace could result in a crash, which is why the Fed had to act when it did.”

Looking forward, Divounguy predicted that mortgage rates would remain elevated for some time, attributing part of the problem to the role of high interest rates in driving up housing costs, as highlighted by Robert Dietz, chief economist for the National Association of Homebuilders. Dietz remarked, “You’ve got a market that’s got a lot of potential for growth that is continuing to lag due to higher-for-longer interest rates.”

Dietz emphasized the importance of addressing the housing supply issue, predicting that housing would be a critical issue in the upcoming 2024 election. He stated, “If pollsters and candidates are out there talking to people, they’ll hear pretty quickly that increasing the attainable housing supply is a must-do.” However, he cautioned against expecting a simple, scalable solution, acknowledging, “There’s kind of a lot of challenges that have to be addressed in the housing market.”

The U.S. housing market’s current challenges, compounded by elevated interest rates and persistent supply shortages, threaten to weigh heavily on the economy ahead of the election. Despite recent efforts by the Biden administration to address affordability through targeted initiatives, the complex nature of local barriers and entrenched economic factors suggest that resolving these issues will require sustained effort and innovative solutions.

Chief Medical Correspondent Urges Biden to Undergo Cognitive Testing Amid Health Concerns

CNN’s chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, has called for President Joe Biden to undergo comprehensive cognitive and movement disorder testing and make the results public. Gupta, a prominent neurosurgeon, wrote in a Friday article that he and several colleagues noticed worrisome signs during Biden’s debate with former President Donald Trump that warrant closer examination of Biden’s health. The symptoms Gupta observed include Biden’s halting speech, quiet voice, slack-jawed appearance, and occasional inability to finish sentences on the debate stage.

“Are we looking at episodes of something? Or is this a condition that should be more fully investigated? And it really seems to be more of the latter,” Gupta remarked on CNN.

Gupta emphasized that the current disclosures about Biden’s health are inadequate for a remote diagnosis. However, following Biden’s concerning debate performance, Gupta and other neurologists agreed that the president needs a detailed evaluation of his cognitive functions, memory, and other potential risk factors.

“In 2020, Biden claimed he was ‘constantly tested’ by the demands of campaigning. ‘All you’ve got to do is watch me,’ he said then,” Gupta pointed out. “The country is watching now, and that assessment gives cause for concern — and a need for transparent testing.”

The doctors’ call for testing comes amid growing doubts about Biden’s ability to run for president, defeat Trump in November, and serve until he is 86. These concerns were heightened by Biden’s recent performance, where he had a raspy voice and gave several incomplete responses. Gupta’s analysis is part of an ongoing media focus on Biden’s age and the transparency of the White House regarding his health.

“It wasn’t that what we noticed was necessarily new but that it was particularly pronounced, and right from the start of the debate,” Gupta wrote, acknowledging that Trump has also previously rambled and confused names or events.

Gupta suggested that factors like low sleep, low blood sugar, or illness could have contributed to Biden’s debate appearance, but testing is necessary to determine the exact cause of the “symptoms displayed” by Biden. He noted that identifying any “possibility of underlying dementia” would ultimately benefit Biden, as early diagnosis and treatment have improved in recent years.

Biden has not been diagnosed with a cognitive disorder. In his annual physical in February, his doctor reported that Biden underwent an “extremely detailed” neurologic exam, which found no symptoms of Parkinson’s and described him as fit for his duties. The exam indicated Biden was being treated for several age-related ailments and had a stiffer gait.

This week, Biden informed a meeting of Democratic governors that he had a medical check-up for a cold after the debate. However, previous health reports have not mentioned any cognitive tests. To reassure voters about his health, Biden is making several public appearances this weekend, including a highly anticipated interview with ABC News scheduled to air on Friday.

The issue of Biden’s health has become a focal point as the election approaches. Gupta’s concerns reflect a broader debate about the transparency of presidential candidates’ health information. Gupta’s commentary underscores the need for detailed cognitive testing to address public concerns about Biden’s fitness for office.

By making his health records more transparent, Biden could potentially alleviate some of the public’s worries. Gupta and his colleagues believe that a thorough examination and sharing the results would provide clarity on Biden’s health status. This approach would help in dispelling doubts and reinforcing the public’s trust in the president’s ability to serve effectively.

The scrutiny of Biden’s health is not new but has intensified with the upcoming election. The media and public are closely watching Biden’s appearances and statements, looking for any signs of health issues. The debate performance brought these concerns to the forefront, prompting medical experts like Gupta to call for more transparency and detailed health assessments.

Gupta’s call for cognitive and movement disorder testing for President Biden reflects the ongoing concerns about the president’s health and the need for transparency. As the election draws nearer, the public and media will continue to scrutinize Biden’s health, making it crucial for the president to address these concerns openly.

U.S. Economy Adds 206,000 Jobs in June, Showing Resilience Amid High Interest Rates

In June, American employers demonstrated the U.S. economy’s robust nature by adding 206,000 jobs, indicating its resilience against persistently high interest rates. While this number shows a slight decrease from May’s 218,000, it still represents solid job growth, underscoring the steady, consumer-driven nature of the American economy despite a gradual slowdown.

The Labor Department’s report released on Friday also revealed a slight uptick in the unemployment rate from 4% to 4.1%. Additionally, the department significantly revised its earlier estimates of job growth for April and May, reducing them by a total of 111,000 jobs.

The economic landscape is becoming a critical issue for voters as the presidential campaign heats up. Despite consistent hiring, low layoffs, and slowly cooling inflation, many Americans remain frustrated by the high cost of living and hold President Joe Biden responsible for these economic pressures.

Economists have repeatedly anticipated a slowdown in the job market due to the Federal Reserve’s high interest rates. Nevertheless, hiring has continued to surpass expectations. There are, however, indications of a broader economic deceleration in response to the Fed’s rate hikes. The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), which measures the total output of goods and services, grew at a sluggish annual rate of 1.4% from January to March, marking the slowest quarterly growth in nearly two years.

Democrats Rally Around Kamala Harris as Biden’s Campaign Falters: Discussions of Potential Running Mate Intensify

In the wake of Joe Biden’s debate performance, many Democratic insiders are now discussing who Kamala Harris might choose as her running mate. A growing number of party officials, operatives, and donors are doubtful that Biden’s campaign can recover, based on CNN’s interviews with two dozen Democratic politicians and operatives.

Biden often says to compare him to the alternative, not the almighty, which is what more Democrats are doing with Harris. Harris and her team have largely ignored the influx of calls and texts, maintaining a firm stance on their support for Biden. However, Harris did make some adjustments, like joining Biden for the Fourth of July picnic and fireworks, a first for her.

Despite her support, the Democratic landscape is shifting around Harris, with former President Donald Trump’s campaign already targeting her. Officials have begun advising donors to back Harris, arguing that a unified party support is essential. Some plans are in motion to convince Biden to endorse Harris immediately, release his Democratic delegates, and request their support for her. This strategy aims to prevent a contentious primary fight.

If the race opens, Democrats hope Harris’ running mate will be a prominent governor. North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper and Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear are frequently mentioned, along with Pennsylvania’s Josh Shapiro, Illinois’ J.B. Pritzker, and Minnesota’s Tim Walz. However, this could complicate matters by not allowing Harris to select her own running mate, a privilege typically given to presidential nominees.

A Democratic senator compared the situation to a football game, with Biden as a star quarterback who might need to be replaced by his backup, Harris. “The backup knows our team, the backup knows the plays, the backup has played in the NFL,” the senator said, highlighting Harris’ familiarity with the political landscape.

Some Democrats fear losing their seats with Harris at the top of the ticket, but others have changed their views, preferring her over Biden. The leader of one major Democratic group said, “Are you kidding?” when asked about preferring Harris, emphasizing that while Biden is in bad shape, Harris could unify the party if she becomes the nominee.

A document titled “Unburdened by What Has Been: The Case for Kamala,” written by senior Democratic operatives, is circulating among donors and coalition groups. It argues that Harris is the only viable candidate to win, stating, “Kamala Harris has the strongest claim to Democratic legitimacy. She is the only candidate who can take the reins right now… She has significant and widely underplayed electoral advantages. She can win.”

Rep. Nanette Barragán, who supported Harris in 2019, noted the shift in conversations about Harris. “It’s nice to see that people are finally recognizing the value of her work and what she brings to the partnership,” she said.

Biden’s sparse public schedule post-debate has increased doubts about him and bolstered Harris’ case. Mini Timmaraju, president of Reproductive Freedom for All, said Harris already has more credibility than Biden on key issues like abortion rights, and emphasized, “You can’t win this election without Kamala.”

Harris loyalists are frustrated by discussions of Biden replacements not centering on her and angered by donors questioning her chances. Recent polls showing a tight race between her and Trump have only heightened their frustrations. Ezra Levin, co-founder of Indivisible, emphasized the need for voters to have confidence in Harris, stating, “It’s foolish and counterproductive to defend Biden by tearing down Harris.”

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) has mostly supported Biden, but members indicate they would quickly back Harris if Biden steps aside. Rep. Gregory Meeks said, “I actually don’t think that anybody else other than her would beat Trump because of what you’d lose in the base,” stressing the importance of Black voter turnout.

Harris has contemplated a Trump challenge before. In 2018, her aides asked how she’d handle a town hall debate with Trump. Her response: “Why are you being so weird?” This showcases her readiness to confront Trump head-on.

Despite her reputation for verbal gaffes, Harris has been on an upswing with voters. After Biden’s debate, she spontaneously told CNN’s Anderson Cooper that a bad 90 minutes shouldn’t overshadow Biden’s three and a half years as president. This line was so effective that it was repeated by Jill Biden and multiple campaign aides.

Harris has focused on Trump for months, planning to target his running mate by highlighting their alignment with Trump’s extremist agenda. Brian Fallon, Harris’ campaign communications director, reaffirmed, “The president is and will remain our party’s nominee, and Vice President Harris is proud to be his running mate and looks forward to serving at his side for four more years.”

The running mate conversation often includes Cooper and Beshear, both former state attorneys general with bipartisan support. Cooper has a long-standing relationship with Harris, calling her “whip smart” and stating, “I think she’s ready to do this job.” Beshear, popular in Kentucky and nationally recognized for his communication skills, has also been invited to speak at Democratic events across the country.

The Democratic party is grappling with Biden’s faltering campaign and looking to Harris as a potential successor. While the transition is fraught with challenges and uncertainties, many believe that Harris, with the right support, can lead the party to victory.

Zelensky Invites Russia to Next Peace Summit, Hints at Possible New Kremlin Leadership

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has extended an invitation to Russia for the next peace summit, despite earlier asserting that Russia could only participate if it surrendered Ukrainian territory.

Initially, Zelensky excluded Russia from the first peace summit held in Switzerland last month, a move that sparked discontent among some officials who argued that achieving peace would be impossible without both warring parties present.

However, on Wednesday, Zelensky seemed to adopt a more flexible approach, acknowledging the potential for Russian involvement in the future. “If the second peace summit has a plan to end the war, and we have more countries, we will organise it and Russian representatives must be present. Who? We will see,” he told Bloomberg News.

When asked about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s possible attendance, Zelensky remarked, “I’m not sure, I think he is afraid to leave Russia. Is it possible that somebody else besides Putin comes? Maybe by this time, there will be somebody else in the Kremlin, then we will talk to somebody else.”

The first Ukrainian-organised peace summit received widespread criticism from analysts, who viewed it as a Western effort to display solidarity with Ukraine rather than a genuine attempt to end the war.

Ahead of the Swiss summit, the Kremlin and its key ally, China, exerted significant diplomatic pressure on countries in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East to boycott the event. The summit concluded with a vague commitment to a follow-up meeting but lacked any concrete outcomes.

In his Bloomberg interview, Zelensky also rejected Putin’s ceasefire proposal, which he had previously labeled a trap. Nevertheless, he proposed that the US and China could serve as intermediaries. “There are many questions between the two but if we want to end this war fairly, for Ukraine and for the whole world, they have to find a stance to stop Putin,” he stated.

Western intelligence sources revealed this week that Chinese factories are manufacturing drones for Russia. China’s influence over Russia has surged since Putin’s comprehensive invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Finnish President Alexander Stubb suggested that Beijing could end the conflict with “one phone call” threatening to withdraw economic and diplomatic support.

Putin and Chinese leader Xi Jinping have been convening in Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, at a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), an economic-military alliance they spearhead. During the summit, Xi emphasized the need for SCO member states to support each other, though he stopped short of advocating for a military alliance. “We should join hands to resist external interference, firmly support each other, take care of each other’s concerns,” he said.

Established in 2001, the SCO initially concentrated on former Soviet Central Asia but has since broadened its scope. On Thursday, Belarus joined the group, which already includes Iran, India, and Pakistan.

Temur Umarov, a Fellow at the Carnegie Centre think tank, noted that the SCO’s primary significance lies in providing a platform for leaders to meet away from Western influence rather than serving as an anti-West alliance. “Russia is trying to use it to gain support for its aggression in Ukraine but it doesn’t have the sympathies of all SCO members,” he commented. “Everybody else wants to remain neutral.”

Alaska’s Juneau Icefield Melting 4.6 Times Faster: Researchers Warn of Imminent Tipping Point

The Juneau Icefield in Alaska, encompassing over 1,000 glaciers, is experiencing an accelerated melt. A recent study reveals that the icefield’s snow-covered areas are shrinking 4.6 times faster than in the 1980s. Researchers have meticulously tracked snow levels since 1948, extending data back to the 18th century. The icefield has been steadily shrinking since its peak after the Little Ice Age around 1850, but the melting rate significantly increased about a decade ago, according to the study published in Nature Communications.

Bethan Davies, a glaciologist at Newcastle University and the study’s lead author, explained, “What’s happening is that as the climate is changing, we’re getting shorter winters and longer summers. We’re having more melt, longer melt season.” This accelerated melting is contributing to a substantial flow of ice into the water, averaging about 50,000 gallons per second, according to study co-author Mauri Pelto, a professor of environmental science at Nichols College.

“In fact, glacier shrinkage in Alaska from the year 2000 to the year 2020, we’re losing more ice in Alaska than anywhere else,” Davies added. The study highlights a stark increase in the number of glaciers disappearing: only four Juneau Icefield glaciers vanished between 1948 and 2005, but 64 disappeared between 2005 and 2019. Many of these glaciers were unnamed due to their small size, but notable larger glaciers like Antler Glacier have completely vanished.

Alaska climatologist Brian Brettschneider, not involved in the study, emphasized the alarming acceleration, warning of a “death spiral” for the thinning icefield. An icefield, different from an ice sheet, is a collection of glaciers. Ice sheets cover entire continents, with only two remaining in Greenland and Antarctica. The Mendenhall Glacier, a prominent glacier in the Juneau Icefield, is a popular tourist destination. The Arctic, including Alaska, is warming four times faster than the global average, with Alaska warming by 2.6 degrees (1.5 degrees Celsius) since 1980, according to federal weather data.

Pelto, who first visited the Juneau Icefield in 1981 aiming to join the U.S. ski team, has studied it ever since, forsaking competitive skiing for research. Reflecting on the changes, he said, “When you go there the changes from year-to-year are so dramatic that it just hits you over the head.” He noted the ease of accessing the glaciers back in 1981, “In 1981, it wasn’t too hard to get on and off the glaciers. You just hike up and you could ski to the bottom or hike right off the end of these glaciers.” Nowadays, melted snow forms lakes at the edges, and crevasses make skiing difficult.

The icefield now resembles a staircase of bare rocks. White snow and ice reflect sunlight, but dark rocks absorb it, warming the ground and accelerating the melting in a feedback loop. The critical factor is the snow elevation line; below this line, summer can melt the snow, while above it, snow remains year-round. Pelto explained that this snow line keeps moving upward, increasing the areas prone to melting.

Juneau’s flat icefield shape makes it particularly vulnerable to tipping points. Davies noted, “The shape of Juneau’s icefield, which is rather flat, makes it vulnerable to particular tipping points because once the snow line moves up, large areas are suddenly more prone to melt.” Pelto emphasized, “The tipping point is when that snow line goes above your entire icefield, ice sheet, ice glacier, whichever one. And so for the Juneau icefield, 2019, 2018, showed that you are not that far away from that tipping point.”

Despite the significant melting, the Juneau Icefield’s complete melt wouldn’t drastically affect global sea levels, though it remains a crucial tourist and cultural site. Julienne Stroeve, an ice scientist at the University of Manitoba, not part of the study, remarked, “It is worrisome because in the future the Arctic is going to be transformed beyond contemporary recognition. It’s just another sign of a large transformation in all the ice components (permafrost, sea ice, land ice) that communities depend on.”

The study team compiled their findings using satellite images, airplane overflights, archived photographs, and historical local measurements, creating a detailed long-term picture of the icefield’s melting. Michael Zemp, head of the World Glacier Monitoring Service, and five other outside experts affirmed the study’s findings, with Zemp stating, “We need urgent and tangible actions to save at least some of the remaining ice.”

Pelto, reflecting on his decades of study, pondered, “We’re 40 years from when I first saw the glacier. And so, 40 years from now, what is it going to look like? I do think by then the Juneau icefield will be past the tipping point.” The future of the Juneau Icefield appears bleak, with accelerated melting trends posing significant environmental challenges.

Stampede at Indian Religious Gathering Claims Over 116 Lives

In a tragic incident on Tuesday, thousands of attendees at a religious gathering in India rushed to leave a makeshift tent, resulting in a deadly stampede that killed at least 116 people and injured many more, according to officials.

The cause of the panic, which followed an event featuring Hindu guru Bhole Baba, remains unclear. However, local news reports suggested that the intense heat and lack of ventilation in the tent might have played a role. Video footage from the scene showed that the tent structure had collapsed.

Prashant Kumar, the director-general of police in Uttar Pradesh, confirmed that most of the deceased were women and children. The stampede occurred in this northern state, where over 80 injured individuals were admitted to hospitals, as stated by senior police officer Shalabh Mathur.

Witness Shakuntala Devi described the chaotic scene to the Press Trust of India: “People started falling one upon another, one upon another. Those who were crushed died. People there pulled them out.”

As bodies of the deceased, covered in white sheets, were lined up on stretchers at a local hospital, relatives expressed their grief and despair. A bus brought in more victims, with bodies lying on the seats inside.

Stampedes at religious festivals in India are not uncommon due to large crowds, inadequate infrastructure, and insufficient safety measures. Rajesh Singh, a police officer, indicated that the event in Hathras district, about 350 kilometers southwest of the state capital Lucknow, likely faced overcrowding.

Organizers had reportedly received permission to host around 5,000 people, but more than 15,000 attended the event led by the Hindu preacher, who previously served as a police officer before dedicating himself to religious sermons over the past two decades.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed his condolences to the families of the victims and assured that the federal government was coordinating with state authorities to provide assistance to the injured. Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath described the incident as “heart-wrenching” in a post on X, and mentioned that an investigation was underway.

“Look what happened and how many people have lost their lives. Will anyone be accountable?” questioned Rajesh Kumar Jha, a member of parliament. He criticized both state and federal governments for their failure to manage large crowds and warned that “people will keep on dying” if safety protocols are not adequately enforced.

This tragic event is reminiscent of past stampedes in India. In 2013, during a popular Hindu festival in Madhya Pradesh, pilgrims trampled each other fearing a bridge collapse, resulting in at least 115 deaths. Similarly, in 2011, over 100 Hindu devotees perished in a crush at a religious festival in Kerala.

U.S. Allocates $176 Million to Moderna for Accelerated Bird Flu Vaccine Development Amid Dairy Cow Outbreaks

The U.S. government has committed $176 million to Moderna for the accelerated development of a pandemic influenza vaccine targeting bird flu, federal officials announced Tuesday. This funding reflects growing concerns about the spread of bird flu to dairy cows across the country.

Moderna is currently in the early stages of testing a bird flu vaccine utilizing the same mRNA technology that facilitated the swift creation and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is providing this new funding to support the ongoing development of the vaccine, potentially leading to a late-stage trial next year, provided that initial study results are promising.

Importantly, HHS officials have highlighted that the project is designed to be adaptable, allowing a swift pivot to address other forms of influenza should a different threat arise, rather than the current focus on the H5N1 strain of bird flu.

The funding is being provided through the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a program dedicated to the development of medical treatments for potential pandemics.

The H5N1 virus, which was detected earlier this year in dairy cows, has now spread to more than 135 herds across 12 states. To date, three people have been infected, all of whom experienced only mild symptoms. Federal health officials emphasize that the overall risk to the general population remains low.

The U.S. government’s investment in Moderna is a proactive measure to combat potential pandemic threats. By leveraging mRNA technology, which proved effective against COVID-19, and ensuring flexibility in targeting various forms of influenza, this initiative aims to bolster national preparedness against future influenza outbreaks.

Israel and Hamas on the Verge of Ceasefire and Hostage Release Deal

According to an Israeli source knowledgeable about the ongoing discussions, Israel and Hamas are nearing a potential framework agreement aimed at establishing a ceasefire and facilitating the release of hostages. The source indicated that recent developments in the negotiations have led Israeli officials to believe that the two sides are poised to enter into more detailed talks to finalize this agreement.

Although the prospect of a deal is promising, it remains far from guaranteed at this stage. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu must first approve moving forward to the next phase of negotiations. This subsequent phase is expected to be complex and protracted, involving several weeks of intense discussions to work out the specifics of any potential agreement. These details will include deciding which Palestinian prisoners will be released in exchange for the Israeli hostages held by Hamas and determining the sequence of these exchanges.

In the coming days, Israeli negotiators are scheduled to meet with the country’s political leaders, including Prime Minister Netanyahu, to decide on whether to proceed with the detailed negotiations. This phase will require careful deliberation and strategic planning to address the various aspects of the proposed deal.

Hamas has officially acknowledged that it has delivered a response to an Israeli proposal through mediators from Qatar and Egypt. The response reiterates Hamas’ demand for a comprehensive ceasefire. “We have put forward some demands that achieve securing access to a complete ceasefire and the withdrawal of Israeli forces,” Basem Naim, a member of Hamas’ political bureau, told CNN on Wednesday.

In addition to this demand, Hamas issued a separate statement on Wednesday indicating that it had “exchanged some ideas” with the mediators with the goal of halting “the aggression against our Palestinian people.” Hamas further noted in a subsequent statement that it has approached the Israeli proposal with a “positive” attitude.

Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh has been actively engaged in discussions with the mediators in Qatar and Egypt. According to a Hamas statement, Haniyeh spent several hours in communication with the mediators to explore ideas “in order to reach an agreement” to end the conflict in Gaza. The statement also revealed that “Communication has also taken place between the head of the movement and officials in Turkey regarding the recent developments.”

On the Israeli side, the Mossad, the country’s intelligence service overseeing the negotiations, confirmed on Wednesday that Egyptian and Qatari mediators had presented Hamas’ latest response to Israel. The Mossad stated, “Israel is evaluating the remarks and will convey its reply to the mediators,” although it did not provide additional details on the nature of the response or the evaluation process.

This latest development in the negotiations comes in the wake of a statement from the Hostage and Missing Families Forum, which has issued a stark warning about the potential public reaction if the government fails to secure a deal for the hostages’ release. The statement expressed a strong sentiment among Israelis regarding the need for a comprehensive agreement. “The people of Israel show time and time again in every poll that they are in favor of a complete deal for the return of all hostages. We will not allow the government’s ministers to torpedo the deal again,” the statement read.

The Forum also framed the situation as a crucial moral test for the government. “The government is at the highest moral test of its tenure: the continuation of abandonment or a determined action for rescue and restoration,” the statement said. “It’s either the complete return of the hostages or all Israeli citizens will be taking to the roads and intersections.”

As the situation evolves, both sides remain engaged in a delicate balance of negotiations, with high stakes for the potential outcomes of these talks. The path forward will depend on whether the two parties can agree on the terms of a ceasefire and the details of a prisoner exchange that addresses the demands and concerns of both Hamas and the Israeli government.

The international community, particularly the mediators from Qatar and Egypt, continues to play a significant role in facilitating these discussions. Their efforts are focused on bridging the gaps between the conflicting positions of Hamas and Israel to achieve a resolution that will bring an end to the violence and secure the release of hostages on both sides.

While there is cautious optimism that a framework agreement for a ceasefire and hostage release might be within reach, the road to finalizing a deal remains fraught with challenges. The upcoming days will be critical as Israeli and Hamas negotiators, along with their respective political leaderships, work through the complexities of the proposed agreement.

Kamala Harris Emerges as Top Contender if Biden Steps Down: Senior Democratic Sources Reveal

Vice President Kamala Harris stands as the leading alternative to replace President Joe Biden if he opts out of his reelection campaign, as per insights from seven senior sources associated with the Biden campaign, the White House, and the Democratic National Committee. These sources reveal ongoing discussions about potential replacements.

Biden’s recent faltering and often incoherent debate performance against Republican Donald Trump has sparked widespread panic within the Democratic party. Concerns about his fitness for a second term have led to calls for the resignation of top aides.

While some influential Democrats have proposed other alternatives to Biden, such as popular cabinet members and Democratic governors like California’s Gavin Newsom, Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer, and Pennsylvania’s Josh Shapiro, the sources believe bypassing Harris would be nearly impossible. They suggest that Harris, with the highest name recognition and polling among potential candidates, would naturally inherit the Biden campaign’s funds and infrastructure if nominated.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll indicates Harris is trailing Trump by just one percentage point (42% to 43%), which falls within the poll’s margin of error of 3.5 percentage points, demonstrating a performance on par with Biden’s. Furthermore, Harris has been thoroughly vetted for national office and has withstood intense scrutiny from Republicans. Notably, U.S. Representative Jim Clyburn, a key figure in Biden’s 2020 victory, expressed his support for Harris as the Democratic nominee if Biden steps aside.

Michael Trujillo, a Democratic strategist from California who worked on Hillary Clinton’s campaigns in 2008 and 2016, stated, “It’s pretty near impossible to win the nomination over the vice president.” He emphasizes Harris’s entrenched position within the party.

On July 2, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre dismissed concerns, attributing Biden’s debate performance to a “bad night” and reaffirming his commitment to running for reelection. The Biden campaign referred questions about the scenario to Harris’s team, which firmly stated, “Vice President Harris looks forward to serving a second term with President Joe Biden.”

Biden’s campaign has secured 3,894 delegates from state primaries, with only a few dozen “uncommitted” delegates left. These delegates are expected to formally nominate Biden later this month during a virtual meeting before the Democratic National Convention in August. Trujillo reiterated Harris’s substantial support within the party, saying, “All of the delegates are not just Joe Biden delegates, they are Kamala Harris delegates,” and she would have significant backing from all states.

Donna Brazile, former interim chair of the Democratic National Committee and a key figure in the upcoming Democratic National Convention, stated that Harris is the immediate successor if Biden steps down. Brazile emphasized the structured process, noting, “People may have dreams of another superhero but there is a process and the last time I checked it’s a Biden-Harris ticket, she’s number two on the ticket,” while reaffirming Biden’s status as the Democratic nominee.

Overlooking Harris, the first Black and female vice president, could trigger backlash from Black and female voters, who are crucial for any Democratic victory, according to several Democratic strategists.

However, some influential Democrats remain skeptical of Harris’s chances against Trump. Four sources mentioned that Harris has been largely sidelined in post-debate speculations due to doubts about her electability. The U.S. has never elected a female president, and Harris’s role as vice president has limited her ability to distinguish herself. As recently as last year, concerns within the White House and the Biden campaign labeled her a potential liability.

Despite finding her footing on abortion rights, Harris’s approval ratings have not significantly improved, lingering below 40%. Polls indicate that she and Biden have comparable odds of defeating Trump. Harris has also faced continuous attacks from Republicans and conservative media, often viewed by her allies as sexist and racist.

Three Democratic donors, who previously advocated for Biden’s withdrawal, conceded this week that bypassing Harris is “impossible.” These donors had been considering Whitmer and Newsom as potential alternatives until recently. One donor remarked, “There is a real conversation in the Democratic party about leadership right now, but fair to say, and I’m not thrilled about this… it will be impossible to ignore Kamala.”

Another donor added, “She’s nobody’s choice, but yeah, nearly impossible.”

Despite growing calls for Biden to step aside, his reelection campaign remains firm, buoyed by his improved performance in a scripted speech in North Carolina. Stephanie Cutter, former deputy campaign manager for Barack Obama and current producer of the Democratic National Convention, stated unequivocally, “President Biden is the nominee and he’s going to remain the nominee.” She warned against fostering intra-party conflict, cautioning, “For those who are looking for some sort of interparty fight, be careful what you wish for because that would ensure a Trump victory.”

Rishi Sunak Apologizes for Historic Conservative Defeat as Keir Starmer Leads Labour to Sweeping Victory

Rishi Sunak has issued an apology to the nation after the Conservative Party’s devastating defeat in the general election, marking the worst performance in its parliamentary history.

Sir Keir Starmer has led the Labour Party to a sweeping victory and will succeed Mr. Sunak as the UK’s prime minister.

Taking full responsibility for the outcome, Mr. Sunak acknowledged the public’s “anger” towards his administration. “To the country, I would like to say first and foremost I am sorry,” he said. “I have given this job my all, but you have sent a clear message that the government of the UK must change, and yours is the judgment that matters. I have heard your anger, your disappointment, and I take responsibility for this loss.”

Despite earlier rain, Mr. Sunak delivered his speech outside Number 10, this time with an umbrella to avoid a repeat of his soaked announcement in May. He stated he would step down as party leader, “not immediately but once the formal arrangements for selecting my successor are in place.” The MP for Richmond and Northallerton assured there would be “an orderly transition” and praised Sir Keir as “a decent and public-spirited man who I respect.”

After bidding farewell to Downing Street staff just before his speech, Mr. Sunak left with his wife, Akshata, to offer his resignation to the King.

In his earlier victory speech in central London, Sir Keir proclaimed “change begins now,” adding, “it feels good, I have to be honest.” With nearly all results declared, Labour is projected to form the next government with a majority of 174, boasting 412 MPs, an increase of 211 from the last election.

The Conservatives face their worst defeat ever, losing 250 seats and currently holding 121 seats. Former Prime Minister Liz Truss, whose brief and disastrous tenure led to a decline in Tory support, lost her South West Norfolk seat to Labour by 630 votes. Ms. Truss saw her significant 32,988 majority overturned, with the Reform candidate coming third with 9,958 votes. Several senior Tories, including Defence Secretary Grant Shapps, Commons leader Penny Mordaunt, Justice Secretary Alex Chalk, and former minister Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, also lost their seats.

Foreign Secretary James Cleverly told the BBC that “a large number of people who had previously voted Conservative have voted Reform,” emphasizing the need for the Conservatives to “think hard” about regaining their support. Former minister Steve Baker, a long-time critic of Tory leaders over Brexit, expressed relief at losing his Wycombe seat after 14 years, stating, “Thank God, I am free – it’s over.”

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage won a seat in Parliament on his eighth attempt, in Clacton, declaring, “this is just the first step of something that is going to stun all of you.” Reform now has four MPs, including chairman Richard Tice and former Tory Lee Anderson, and has placed second in many areas, drawing significant votes from the Conservatives.

In his London victory speech, Sir Keir told enthusiastic Labour supporters that the country was waking up to “the sunlight of hope” which was “shining once again on a country with the opportunity after 14 years to get its future back.” He added, “Now we can look forward – walk into the morning.”

The Liberal Democrats, slightly behind Reform in votes, have benefitted most from the Tory collapse, reaching a record 71 MPs, including seats of three former Tory PMs – Boris Johnson, David Cameron, and Theresa May. Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey remarked, “This is a record-breaking night for the Liberal Democrats.” He pledged to work hard to maintain trust with a focus on key issues, particularly the NHS and care.

The Green Party of England and Wales now has four MPs, with co-leaders Carla Denyer and Adrian Ramsay among the winners. However, it was a disastrous night for the SNP, which has been reduced to just eight MPs so far.

Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn retained his Islington North seat as an independent. In contrast, another prominent former Labour MP, George Galloway, failed to hold onto his Rochdale seat, losing to Labour’s Paul Waugh.

Sir Keir Starmer’s landslide is just shy of the 179-majority Tony Blair achieved in 1997, with Labour’s national vote share up by only 2%, mainly due to significant gains in Scotland, according to polling expert Sir John Curtice. Nonetheless, it signifies a Labour prime minister in Downing Street for the first time since 2010 and sparks a struggle over the Conservative Party’s future direction.

Penny Mordaunt, narrowly defeated by Labour by 780 votes, had been considered a potential candidate for Tory leadership post-election. Conceding defeat, she attributed the loss to the party’s failure to honor the trust people placed in it. Her sentiments were echoed by Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Heaton-Harris, who admitted the Tories had “lost the trust of the British people by not delivering,” adding, “We have to regroup and reconnect and actually just be a unified Conservative Party.”

The Conservatives lost seats they’ve held since the 19th or early 20th century across England’s shire counties. Former attorney general Sir Robert Buckland, the first Tory MP to lose his seat as results began coming in, described the situation as “electoral Armageddon” and viewed Labour’s victory as a “big vote for change.” He sharply criticized colleagues, such as former home secretary Suella Braverman, for what he termed “spectacularly unprofessional and ill-disciplined” behavior during the campaign, lamenting the upcoming Tory leadership contest as “going to be like a group of bald men arguing over a comb.”

The SNP is “not winning that argument” on Scottish independence, acknowledged First Minister John Swinney. “Opinion polls still show that about half the population in Scotland want our country to be independent,” he told the BBC. “That’s not manifested itself in the election result tonight, and that’s something we’ve got to look at very carefully as a party and to think about how we can remedy that situation.”

Indian-American Businessman Rishi Shah Sentenced for $1 Billion Fraud Scheme

Rishi Shah, an Indian-American businessman and former billionaire co-founder of Outcome Health, has been sentenced to seven and a half years in prison by a US court for his involvement in a Rs 8,300 crore ($1 billion) fraud scheme. This high-profile case impacted investors such as Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Google parent Alphabet Inc., and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker’s venture capital firm. The verdict, delivered by US District Judge Thomas Durkin, concluded one of the largest corporate fraud cases in recent history.

Outcome Health, originally named Context Media Health, was founded in 2006 by Shah during his university days. The company’s innovative vision was to transform medical advertising by installing televisions in doctors’ offices to stream health ads targeted at patients. Shah partnered with co-founder Shradha Agrawal, and the company experienced exponential growth, aiming to bridge the communication gap between patients and healthcare providers through strategic ad placements.

By the mid-2010s, Outcome Health had become a significant player in the tech and healthcare investment sectors. The promise of integrating advanced technology into traditional healthcare marketing attracted high-profile investors. During its rapid ascent, Outcome secured substantial funding and clientele, establishing Shah as a prominent figure in Chicago’s corporate circles.

Lies and Deceit

However, behind the company’s glittering success lay a foundation of deceit. Prosecutors revealed that Shah, 38, along with Agrawal and chief financial officer Brad Purdy, orchestrated a massive fraud scheme against investors, clients, and lenders by misrepresenting the company’s operational and financial health. Central to the fraud was the sale of more advertising inventory than Outcome Health could deliver and the fabrication of data to conceal the shortfall.

The company misled pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk A/S and other clients about the size of its network and the reach of its ads. This misleading information, coupled with fraudulent data, created an illusion of exponential revenue growth, which enticed further investments and financial backing.

Shah’s extravagant lifestyle, funded by inflated ad sales and investor financing, was marked by lavish spending, including exotic trips on private jets and yachts and the purchase of a $10 million home. In 2016, Shah’s net worth was estimated at over $4 billion, a figure inflated by deceptive accounting practices.

The fraudulent activities were exposed in 2017 through a Wall Street Journal investigation. Subsequently, a group of investors, including Goldman Sachs, Alphabet, and Governor Pritzker’s firm, filed lawsuits against Outcome Health, accusing it of fraud in its $487.5 million fundraising earlier that year. This fundraiser had returned a $225 million dividend to Shah and Agrawal but left investors with a grossly overvalued stake in a company on the brink of collapse.

Legal Consequences

Shah was indicted on more than a dozen counts of fraud and money laundering and was convicted on these charges in April 2023. Agrawal and Purdy were also convicted. Prosecutors sought a 15-year sentence for Shah and 10-year sentences for his co-conspirators. However, District Judge Durkin’s final rulings varied: Agrawal received a three-year sentence in a halfway house, and Purdy was sentenced to two years and three months in prison. In addition to the criminal case, the US Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a civil action against Shah, Agrawal, Purdy, and former chief growth officer Ashik Desai. Desai and other Outcome employees had already pleaded guilty before the jury trial.

Public Apology

In poor health, Shah expressed remorse and accepted responsibility during his sentencing. He acknowledged his failure to manage the aggressive expansion of Outcome Health adequately and for fostering a corporate culture that led to deceptive practices. In a prepared statement, he admitted, “The culture I created permissioned people on my team to think it was okay to create false data in response to a client question.” He further stated, “I am ashamed and embarrassed by the misconduct that brought down the company.”

The Outcome Health scandal serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of corporate fraud and the importance of maintaining ethical business practices. Shah’s sentencing marks the end of a significant chapter in one of the most notable corporate fraud cases in recent memory, highlighting the importance of transparency and accountability in the business world.

Doctors Protest Harsh New Law on National Doctor’s Day, Citing Increased Penalties for Medical Negligence

On National Doctor’s Day, doctors across the professional spectrum expressed discontent and anger, opting to protest rather than celebrate.

Their protests centered on a specific provision in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which replaced outdated British-era laws. This discontent highlighted the medical community’s widespread concern about the legal change coinciding with National Doctors’ Day.

The new law imposes both a fine and a mandatory five-year jail term on doctors found guilty of negligence not amounting to culpable homicide. Previously, under the Indian Penal Code, penalties included a fine or up to two years in jail.

Despite Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Health Minister J.P. Nadda extending greetings to doctors, many medical professionals saw the new BNS law as a punitive measure. One doctor called it a “gift from the government” designed to punish them.

Dr. Arun Gupta, president of the Delhi Medical Council, commented, “Earlier, the provision under 304 A did not specify medical professions, and it was of a general nature. However, the new law brings modern medicine practitioners into the ambit and clearly defines them. The law now makes jail term mandatory.” He questioned the lack of protection for doctors handling critically ill patients under the new law, asking, “What kind of protection will they have now?”

He expressed his concerns on Twitter: “BNS is here – happy Doctor’s Day from the government. Now, jail is a must in case of medical negligence. Think 100 times before you take a sick patient.”

Dr. Gupta further highlighted that a Supreme Court ruling had previously stated police negligence under 304 A must be severe to warrant action. The Court had also mandated that police could not register a case against a doctor without clearance from a competent medical body. He questioned the fate of these clauses now that the IPC had been repealed.

Dr. R.V. Asokan, National President of the Indian Medical Association (IMA), stated that they had communicated their concerns to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah, arguing that doctors should be exempt from the law as their actions do not involve criminal intent. The IMA, representing over 3.5 lakh members, felt the new law unfairly increased penalties for doctors.

“The new law has in fact increased the punishment for the doctors. Doctors don’t deserve this,” Dr. Asokan told this paper.

Kerala-based Dr. K.V. Babu expressed his disappointment, saying, “Today, Doctors’ Day 2024, is a sombre day for doctors practising modern medicine in our country.” He added, “Hundreds of our colleagues have sacrificed their lives when our nation was going through the worst COVID pandemic. Now it seems that jail is ‘Modi Sarkar’s gift’ to medical professionals who will likely get convicted in case of unfortunate situations when a death occurs during treatment.”

During a parliamentary discussion last year, Shah had stated the criminal law bill was amended to provide relief to medical professionals in cases of death due to alleged medical negligence. He had promised to bring an amendment to protect doctors from being treated as criminals in such situations.

However, Dr. Rohan Krishnan, FAIMA national chairman, pointed out that doctors were not exempt from the new law and instead faced harsher penalties. “What was promised in the parliament has not been delivered. This change in the law can be misused against the doctor who genuinely works to save the patient’s lives. How will a doctor now treat an emergency patient? Now, doctors will refer serious cases to a government hospital as they would not want to be involved in litigation. In the end, the patient will suffer.”

Dr. Rajeev Jayadevan, past president of the IMA Cochin, explained that modern medical practice involves inherent risks. “Many of these carry an inherent risk of side effects, injury or death which is never intentional. This makes it different from homicide, notably because the action is taken in the patient’s best interest, and done with informed consent.” He added, “Despite the best efforts, bad outcomes do occur, such is the nature of the profession. Unfortunately, excessive fear of punishment discourages doctors from discharging their duties, and many are now opting to take up less risky specialties. This eventually will harm patients who are critically ill, and whose lives could be potentially saved.”

Dr. Dhruv Chauhan, national council coordinator of the Indian Medical Association-Junior Doctors Network (IMA-JDN), remarked, “This doctor’s day, we have got something which surely no doctor would probably want! The doctors working in the critical departments already have to worry before treating a sick patient thinking what if anything happens to the patient by trying to save life by critical approach then it’s the doctor who has to pay and suffer. The doctors should be relieved from these acts considering the sensitivity of our profession.”

Dr. Asokan suggested the government should clarify the provisions under Section 26 and Section 106 of BNS for the benefit of investigating officers (IO). He recommended that the home ministry instruct IOs to act against doctors only when there is clear evidence of recklessness or gross negligence and to register a case only after consulting a state medical expert team, as practiced in some states.

Previously, under Section 304 A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), those causing death by negligence not amounting to culpable homicide faced up to two years of imprisonment, a fine, or both. Under the new BNS law, Section 106 (1) prescribes up to five years of imprisonment and a fine for similar offenses, with mandatory imprisonment for those found guilty.

The BNS law defines a “Registered medical practitioner” as someone with a recognized medical qualification under the National Medical Commission Act 2019 and listed in the National Medical Register or a State Medical Register under that Act.

-+=