Category: Nation

Teachers hailed as heroes after grizzly bear attack injures 11

Staff ReporterCommunity, Health, Nation 0

Teachers in British Columbia are being hailed as heroes after successfully repelling a grizzly bear that attacked a school group, injuring eleven students.

In a harrowing incident on Thursday, a group of students and teachers were attacked by a grizzly bear while walking along a trail in Bella Coola, British Columbia. The attack left eleven individuals injured, prompting a swift response from the teachers who were present.

According to Insp. Kevin Van Damme of British Columbia’s Conservation Officer Service, the group had paused on the trail when the bear emerged from the forest and charged at them. “Teachers successfully repelled the bear using pepper spray and a bear banger,” Van Damme reported in a social media update.

The injured included students from the fourth and fifth grades. Reports indicate that two of the victims were in critical condition, while another two were classified as serious. The remaining seven individuals received treatment at the scene, as confirmed by British Columbia Health Services.

The incident took place in Bella Coola, a remote town located over 400 miles north of Vancouver. Following the attack, the victims were transported to Bella Coola Hospital and were subsequently being transferred to facilities in Vancouver for further medical care.

As of Friday, officials were actively searching for the bear involved in the attack, which they believe may have been previously injured. The situation has raised concerns within the local community, prompting officials to emphasize the importance of safety and awareness in the area.

Insp. Van Damme acknowledged the distressing nature of the incident for the community, stating, “We recognize this incident is distressing for the community. We are in close contact with the Nuxalk Nation as our investigation continues. We thank them for their collaborative efforts to ensure community awareness and shared safety information.” He also extended thoughts and well wishes to the victims and their families, hoping for a full and speedy recovery.

Tamara Davidson, British Columbia’s Minister of Environment and Parks, praised the teachers for their quick thinking and bravery during the crisis. She referred to them as “true heroes,” highlighting their preparedness in the face of danger, according to reports from the Guardian.

This incident comes amid growing concerns about bear encounters in the region, particularly as the State Department recently issued warnings to Americans traveling in Japan, where deadly bear attacks have claimed thirteen lives since April. The advisory urged travelers to remain vigilant.

The community of Bella Coola is now left to grapple with the aftermath of the attack, as officials continue their investigation and search for the bear. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers posed by wildlife in natural settings and the importance of preparedness when venturing into bear country.

Source: Original article

Epstein Files Reveal Systemic Willful Blindness in High-Profile Cases

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, Women 0

In the wake of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, a troubling silence persists among powerful men, revealing a culture of complicity that perpetuates the exploitation of women globally.

The downfall of influential figures often brings with it a disturbing silence, a silence that is meticulously crafted by privilege and institutions that instinctively protect their own. Following the revelations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, the world caught a fleeting glimpse into the depths of what the powerful are capable of when shielded from accountability.

As the curtain was pulled back, it revealed men whose reputations once seemed unassailable. Among those who retreated into the shadows were notable figures such as Larry Summers and Prince Andrew. Their proximity to Epstein demanded transparency, yet instead, they offered carefully crafted statements, legal maneuvering, and a retreat into polished invisibility. What transpired was not accountability but a choreography of avoidance, leaving the public with silence rather than truth.

This silence is far from neutral; it is a form of complicity. Complicity, especially in the context of the exploitation of women, represents a global catastrophe. The predation of women by powerful men is not merely an American disgrace or an isolated moral failure of the elite; it is a pervasive issue embedded in cultures worldwide. In India, for instance, young women and girls continue to endure brutal assaults that shock the conscience. Mothers mourn, fathers rage, and daughters suffer violence rooted in the same pathology of entitlement that fuels exploitation in the private jets and luxury apartments of the global elite.

Whether in the opulent rooms of billionaires or the dark streets of Delhi, the impulse remains the same: domination disguised as desire and power masquerading as privilege. Predatory behavior constitutes a mental health crisis that society refuses to diagnose. It stems from narcissism, unchecked entitlement, and the intoxicating allure of control. Instead of confronting this sickness, societies have constructed systems to accommodate it. Allegations are buried, colleagues look away, and entire industries protect the reputations of the men who sustain them.

Even when the truth emerges, the machinery of influence rushes to soften it, contextualize it, or bury it beneath procedural bureaucracy. What is perhaps most chilling is that the world has only glimpsed a fraction of the truth. The Epstein case serves as a doorway, not a destination, to uncovering the full extent of what transpired. There are more names behind the curtain—individuals with global influence, political power, financial reach, and cultural standing—whose identities have been partially shielded through sealed documents, quiet negotiations, and mutually beneficial silence.

As more records inevitably come to light and as more survivors find the courage to speak out, society will face the uncomfortable reality that the circle of complicity is far wider than previously acknowledged. The pressing question is not whether more powerful men will be implicated, but rather how many, and how long society has been willing to look away.

The tragedy deepens when one considers that every survivor is someone’s daughter. These young women are cherished within their families, loved unconditionally, and deserving of the fierce protection that every parent instinctively offers. Yet the hypocrisy is staggering: none of the powerful men who benefited from silence and privilege would tolerate such violence inflicted upon their own children. If the horrors suffered by these women were visited upon the daughters of the elite, there would be no hesitation, no obfuscation, and no retreat into silence. Instead, there would be outrage, justice, and an unwavering pursuit of truth. However, when the victims are not their own, the urgency dissipates, replaced by legal strategies and public relations choreography.

It is crucial to recognize that every individual has made mistakes that have hurt others, and no one is exempt from this truth. However, human imperfection does not equate to preying on young women as if it were a sport, particularly by men who are fully aware of their actions. The real scandal in cases like Epstein’s is not solely the crimes committed but the collective refusal to confront what those crimes reveal about our society.

We have cultivated a culture that prioritizes rehabilitating the powerful over protecting the vulnerable. The public has been conditioned to forget, allowing institutions to regain their confidence. The implicated gradually reemerge, cleansed not by repentance but by the passage of time and strategically engineered amnesia. Each time society allows this cycle to unfold, it betrays women everywhere.

We have lived too long under an unspoken jungle law, where the powerful roam freely while the rest of us remain silent. The powerful devour, and the vulnerable endure. If there is to be any genuine progress, we must dismantle this ancient code. A society cannot claim to be civilized if it continues to excuse its giants while sacrificing its daughters. Until we confront the culture of willful blindness that shields the powerful and abandons their victims, we will remain trapped in a world where silence is as dangerous as the crimes it conceals.

The jungle persists only because we avert our eyes. It will fall only when we find the courage to confront reality for what it is.

Source: Original article

Trump and Indian-American Leaders: Key Meetings and Their Impact

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

No sparks flew during the meeting between New York’s mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani and Donald Trump, despite their past insults, as they found common ground in a surprising conversation.

In a meeting that surprised many, New York’s mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani and former President Donald Trump set aside their past insults to engage in a surprisingly amicable conversation. Mamdani, who has previously labeled Trump a “Fascist despot,” was met with a warm reception from the Queens-born real estate mogul.

During their encounter, Trump praised Mamdani for running an “incredible race” against formidable opponents. He expressed his willingness to live in New York City under a Mayor Mamdani, a statement that seemed to resonate with the newly elected official.

As reporters pressed Mamdani on whether he would retract his previous comments about Trump being a “despot” and an “authoritarian,” Trump interjected, suggesting that he had been called worse. “I’ve been called much worse than a despot, and so it’s not that insulting,” he said, predicting that Mamdani might reconsider his stance after they began working together.

When Mamdani hesitated to affirm his view of Trump as a “fascist,” Trump jovially encouraged him to simply say yes, which Mamdani did, albeit with a blush. Following the meeting, Trump described their discussion as “very productive,” noting that they agreed on more issues than he had anticipated.

Later, Trump took to Truth Social to share his thoughts on the meeting, stating, “It was a Great Honor meeting Zohran Mamdani, the new Mayor of New York City!” He accompanied his post with nine photographs of the two together, showcasing a moment of camaraderie.

In contrast to the warmth of his meeting with Mamdani, Trump was less than pleased with questions from the press regarding sensitive topics. As he prepared to welcome Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Trump confronted a Bloomberg News correspondent who inquired about his reluctance to release files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. “Quiet. Quiet, piggy,” he admonished, dismissing her question about the potential incriminating nature of the files.

Four days later, Trump again clashed with the media, this time with an ABC News reporter who questioned the crown prince about the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Trump defended the prince, stating, “A lot of people didn’t like that gentleman that you’re talking about. Whether you like him or didn’t like him, things happen. But he knew nothing about it, and we can leave it at that.”

As the Society of Professional Journalists condemned Trump’s remarks, the White House defended him, asserting that he was simply being frank. His press secretary claimed that Trump was known for calling out “fake news” and expressed frustration with reporters who spread misinformation, though she did not specify what that misinformation was.

Amidst the controversy, Trump rolled out the red carpet for the crown prince, hosting a lavish quasi-state dinner that included a military flyover and appearances by soccer stars and billionaires from the tech and finance sectors. Trump claimed that Saudi Arabia would invest up to $1 trillion in the United States, promising “jobs, lots of jobs” as a result.

Critics argued that the visit benefited Saudi Arabia more than the U.S., with reports indicating that the crown prince secured advanced military technology and enhanced legitimacy in exchange for promised investments.

Trump continued his trend of targeting Democrats, calling for the arrest of six Democratic lawmakers who had urged military and intelligence personnel to disobey illegal orders. He labeled their actions as “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL,” suggesting that they should be “ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL.” He further escalated his rhetoric by claiming that such behavior was “punishable by DEATH!” and shared a post that proclaimed, “HANG THEM. GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD!!”

As outrage grew among Democrats, the White House countered that Trump had never issued an illegal order and insisted that he was not threatening death.

Despite criticisms suggesting that Trump was losing support among his base, he sought to connect with voters at a McDonald’s summit, branding himself as “the VERY FIRST former McDonald’s fry cook ever to become President of the United States.” He reminisced about his brief stint at the fast-food chain during his presidential campaign.

In a lighter moment, Trump met with Portuguese football star Cristiano Ronaldo, sharing an AI-generated video of their interaction in the Oval Office. Trump described Ronaldo as a “GREAT GUY” and expressed his enjoyment of their meeting, showcasing his ability to blend politics with celebrity culture.

As the former president continues to navigate a complex political landscape, his interactions with figures like Mamdani and the crown prince reveal a blend of camaraderie and controversy that characterizes his approach to leadership.

Source: Original article

President Comments on Chicago Riot After 8 Shot, 1 Dead

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

President Trump claims Chicago residents are calling for federal assistance following a violent riot in the city that left eight injured and one dead over the weekend.

President Donald Trump stated on Saturday that residents of Chicago are urging him to “bring in Trump” as the city grapples with a surge in crime. This statement follows a violent riot that erupted in the downtown area, resulting in multiple injuries to police officers and several children being shot.

During the unrest, which occurred in the Chicago Loop, at least eight teenagers were shot, one of whom later died from their injuries. The riot began around 10 p.m. on Friday, shortly after a Christmas tree lighting ceremony near State and Randolph streets, according to reports from FOX 32 Chicago.

Trump took to Truth Social to express his concerns, writing, “Massive crime and rioting in the Chicago Loop area. Multiple Police Officers attacked and badly injured. 300 people rioting, 6 victims shot, one critical and one DEAD.” He criticized Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson for refusing federal assistance, claiming, “The people are chanting, BRING IN TRUMP!!!”

City Alderman Brian Hopkins, representing Chicago’s 2nd Ward, reported that approximately 300 juveniles participated in the riot, during which they attacked officers with mace and stun guns. At least one officer was hospitalized due to injuries sustained during the chaos.

Among the shooting victims were a 13-year-old, two 14-year-olds, a 15-year-old, a 16-year-old, and a 17-year-old. Tragically, a 14-year-old boy later succumbed to his injuries at a hospital. An 18-year-old man was also reported to have been wounded in the incident.

The violence in Chicago comes on the heels of another alarming incident involving a man with a lengthy criminal history. Lawrence Reed, 50, has been accused of setting a woman on fire while on a Chicago train. Officials described Reed as someone who “had no business being on the streets,” and he faces charges related to terrorism and violence against a mass transportation system.

Despite a history of arrests—at least a dozen since 2017, including charges of felony aggravated arson and multiple instances of battery—a judge released Reed back into the community with an ankle monitor, following prosecutors’ requests to keep him detained.

Mayor Johnson characterized the train attack as an “isolated incident,” but the recent events have raised serious concerns about public safety in the city. Local business owners have voiced frustration over the leadership’s handling of crime, with some calling for a return to law and order.

As the situation continues to unfold, the calls for federal intervention in Chicago’s crime crisis grow louder, with residents expressing their desire for a change in leadership and strategy to address the escalating violence.

According to FOX News, the unrest and subsequent calls for help highlight the ongoing challenges faced by city officials in managing crime and ensuring the safety of their constituents.

Source: Original article

Lincoln Elementary Recognized on ERP Honor Roll with Sewa International Support

Staff ReporterCommunity, Education, Nation 0

Lincoln Elementary School in California has achieved recognition on the ERP Honor Roll, thanks to the support of Sewa International’s ASPIRE program, which promotes academic excellence and student success.

Lincoln Elementary School in California has joined the prestigious ERP Honor Roll, a recognition awarded to only 21% of public schools statewide for their outstanding academic achievements. This accomplishment was made possible through the support of Sewa International’s ASPIRE program.

Principal Gerson Sandoval expressed his gratitude for the assistance provided by Sewa International, stating, “Because of your support, we have been able to give every child the chance to learn and grow where they are – we have achieved something truly special.” His appreciation was conveyed in a letter addressed to the ASPIRE team, which is led by Program Director Sudha Prabhunandan, along with intervention specialists Victor Fisher and Renuka Jethmalani.

In his letter, Mr. Sandoval emphasized the collaborative effort between Lincoln Elementary and Sewa International, saying, “Together we are demonstrating that when we lift every student, we lift our whole school. We look forward to continuing this journey with you – toward even greater success and growth for our children.”

The ERP (Educational Results Partnership) Honor Roll recognizes a total of 1,834 out of 10,600 public elementary schools across California. Since 2023, Sewa’s ASPIRE program has partnered with Lincoln Elementary, which is part of the Newark School District. The initiative focuses on enhancing students’ skills in reading, math, creative arts, and English, while also fostering curiosity, creativity, and confidence through both in-school support and after-school enrichment activities.

Sewa’s ASPIRE program is dedicated to transforming the educational landscape for students in resource-constrained schools across the Bay Area, Atlanta, Houston, and other regions in the United States. Volunteers within the program collaborate closely with teachers to provide small-group coaching and homework assistance, which is especially beneficial for students from low-income families.

The ASPIRE program offers a diverse range of courses, including robotics, communication skills, art, and yoga, all aimed at strengthening students’ academic abilities and emotional well-being. “Every child deserves the chance to dream big and achieve their full potential — to read with confidence, to solve problems with curiosity, and to believe they can make a difference,” said Srikanth Gundavarapu, President of Sewa International USA.

Since its inception, Sewa’s ASPIRE initiative has positively impacted over 1,500 elementary students across Newark and Livermore in California, with volunteers contributing more than 6,000 hours during the 2024–2025 school year alone. The program not only enhances academic performance but also cultivates leadership and empathy among high school volunteers who serve as mentors and role models.

Beyond academics, ASPIRE encourages civic engagement through various activities, including school gardening projects, creative arts, and community-led events such as the ASPIRE Carnival and Spelling Bee competition. These initiatives provide students with hands-on learning experiences that enrich their education and foster a sense of community.

As Lincoln Elementary celebrates its recognition on the ERP Honor Roll, the partnership with Sewa International continues to pave the way for future successes, ensuring that every student has the opportunity to thrive in a supportive and enriching environment.

Source: Original article

Modi Ally Fuels Investment Surge in Andhra Pradesh’s Economy

Staff ReporterBusiness, Election, Politics 0

A rising political figure in Andhra Pradesh, Nara Lokesh, is spearheading a significant investment wave, securing over $120 billion in commitments from global corporations in just 16 months.

AMARAVATI, India, Nov 19 — Nara Lokesh, a 42-year-old Stanford MBA and influential political figure, is rapidly becoming the go-to contact for global corporations looking to invest in India. By leveraging his party’s strong ties to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Lokesh has established a reputation for expediting billion-dollar projects, effectively navigating through India’s notorious bureaucratic challenges.

In just 16 months, Lokesh claims to have secured $120 billion in confirmed investment commitments for Andhra Pradesh, surpassing any other Indian state or union territory.

Among the notable investments are:

Google’s commitment to building a $15 billion data center, marking the company’s largest investment in India to date.

ArcelorMittal–Nippon Steel’s pledge of nearly $17 billion towards a 17.8-million-tonne steel plant, with the joint venture affirming its commitment to the multi-phase project.

“We no longer hold meetings just to exchange MoUs and pose for photos,” Lokesh stated. “Every meeting must produce outcomes.” His party, the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), governs Andhra Pradesh and plays a crucial role in supporting Modi’s national coalition.

“I want the state to move from ‘ease of doing business’ to the speed of doing business,” he added, emphasizing the need for swift action in securing investments.

As a key power broker in a coalition era, Lokesh’s influence is significant. Although Modi has been at the helm of India since 2014, his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) secured only 240 seats in the 543-member parliament during the last general election. This has made the ruling coalition heavily reliant on partners like the TDP.

For years, foreign investors have expressed frustration over India’s sluggish bureaucracy, complex tax structures, and rigid regulatory frameworks. Lokesh and his father, Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu, are striving to present a new model of governance that addresses these concerns.

Their efforts have garnered high-profile endorsements. At a recent conference, Karan Adani of the Adani Group remarked, “Your ‘Speed of Doing Business’ mantra is not a slogan — we’ve experienced it firsthand.” Adani has committed an additional $12 billion in investment over the next decade, building on the $5 billion already invested in Andhra Pradesh.

Lokesh attributes the coalition partnership with providing Andhra “a voice at the table,” but he emphasizes that national support is only effective if states can execute swiftly. His ambitious goal is to secure $1 trillion in firm commitments before the 2029 national and state elections.

One of Lokesh’s significant achievements is the breakthrough with Google. As the state minister for human resources development and electronics, he learned in late 2024 that Google was seeking a location in India for a massive AI-focused data center. The tech giant required assurances on two critical issues: no retrospective taxation, which had previously troubled companies like Vodafone and Cairn Energy, and clarity on data interception rules, particularly concerning third-country AI data.

India currently permits interception for national security purposes. Lokesh quickly mobilized a team of young officials who coordinated directly with senior ministers in New Delhi. Within months, Google announced its landmark investment, scheduled to take place between 2026 and 2030.

While Lokesh declined to disclose specifics about the concessions made, he insisted that nothing illegal or improper was involved. “The goal is speed, not shortcuts,” stated Saikanth Varma, CEO of the Andhra Pradesh Economic Development Board.

Andhra Pradesh’s “spicy” investment formula has proven effective. ArcelorMittal–Nippon Steel considered several states, including those governed by the BJP, before ultimately selecting Andhra for its mega steel plant. Lokesh noted that Modi approved a crucial 200-kilometer slurry pipeline “within seconds,” which played a pivotal role in securing the deal.

Consultant Sanjeev Singh remarked that Andhra’s aggressive approach fosters healthy competition among states. However, he cautioned that it could lead to uneven industrial growth, labor shortages, and infrastructure strain in other regions.

Neighboring Karnataka, governed by the Congress party, acknowledged that it lost the Google data center opportunity because Andhra offered concessions on power, land, water, and taxes that Karnataka deemed too costly for its public.

As Nara Lokesh continues to drive investment in Andhra Pradesh, his efforts may reshape the state’s economic landscape and set a precedent for governance in India.

Source: Original article

Nigeria Experiences Severe Mass Kidnapping of Over 300 Schoolchildren

Staff ReporterConflict, Nation, Politics 0

Nigeria is grappling with one of its most severe mass kidnappings, as armed men abduct over 300 schoolchildren in Niger State, raising alarms about the deteriorating security situation in the country.

Nigeria is facing a crisis following one of the deadliest mass abductions in recent years. Armed men kidnapped more than 300 schoolchildren in Niger State on Friday, amplifying concerns about the worsening security landscape across the nation.

Initial reports indicated that approximately 227 students had been taken. However, on Saturday, the Christian Association of Nigeria revealed that the actual number was significantly higher. According to the association, 315 individuals were abducted from St. Mary’s Co-Education Catholic School, comprising 303 students and 12 teachers.

The association further disclosed that a verification exercise uncovered an additional 88 students who were captured while attempting to flee from the attackers. As of now, no group has claimed responsibility for the abduction.

This incident marks a second abduction in just a few days. Earlier, gunmen targeted a secondary school in Kebbi State, seizing 25 girls. Both kidnappings come in the wake of U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent threats of military action in response to the killing of Christians by extremist groups in Nigeria. While the connection between these events remains unclear, the timing has heightened political and security anxieties.

The Nigerian government has yet to publicly confirm the total number of individuals abducted. Niger State Governor Mohammed Umar Bago stated that security agencies were still conducting a headcount and would release the final figures later in the day. In light of the escalating threat, Bago had previously ordered several schools to shut down due to security risks and has now mandated the closure of all schools in the state.

In response to the growing danger, Nigeria’s national education ministry has directed 47 boarding schools across the country to suspend operations until further notice. This decision reflects the urgent need to address the increasing violence targeting educational institutions.

As the crisis unfolds, President Bola Tinubu has cancelled upcoming international engagements, including his planned trip to the G20 Summit in Johannesburg, in order to manage the emergency situation. The U.S. Pentagon has also weighed in, following discussions between U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Nigerian National Security Advisor Nuhu Ribadu. The U.S. has urged Nigeria to take both urgent and lasting action to combat violence against Christians.

This latest kidnapping has revived painful memories of the infamous Chibok abductions in 2014, when Boko Haram militants kidnapped nearly 300 schoolgirls from Borno State. Many of those victims remain missing more than a decade later, underscoring the long-lasting impact of such tragedies.

Security analysts are warning that the recent surge in school kidnappings indicates a dangerous resurgence of armed criminal networks and extremist groups across northern and central Nigeria. As rescue efforts intensify, many Nigerians are left fearing that the country may be entering yet another prolonged cycle of violence targeting schools.

Source: Original article

National Immigrant Rights Groups Sue Government Over ICE Arrest Records

Staff ReporterConflict, Immigration, Politics 0

National immigrant rights organizations have filed a lawsuit against the federal government, demanding the release of records related to arrests at immigration courts and the dismissal of cases.

Washington, D.C., October 15 — LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the American Immigration Council, and Democracy Forward have initiated legal action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit seeks the release of crucial records that the government has allegedly withheld regarding arrests at immigration courts and the subsequent dismissal of immigration cases.

Since May 20, 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), along with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), have been involved in a coordinated effort to detain noncitizens who appear for their hearings in immigration courts across the country.

The practice of arresting individuals who voluntarily attend their immigration court dates in search of protection raises significant concerns. Immigration courts are intended to be venues that ensure fair hearings, not mechanisms that funnel individuals into detention. When those seeking justice are instead arrested, it undermines fundamental democratic principles, deters individuals from exercising their legal rights, and inflicts severe human costs.

Furthermore, ICE attorneys have been requesting immigration judges to dismiss cases and transfer individuals into expedited removal, a process that offers fewer due process protections and no pathway to permanent residence. The EOIR has instructed immigration judges to grant these dismissals immediately, despite this practice violating established agency policy and longstanding norms.

In an effort to understand the rationale behind these arrests at immigration courts, LatinoJustice and the American Immigration Council submitted a total of 11 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests on July 28 and 29, 2025. Six of these requests were directed to the EOIR, while five were sent to ICE. The requests aim to obtain basic information regarding arrests and dismissals in immigration courts, as well as communications between the agencies involved in these actions. The organizations also requested expedited processing for these requests.

However, the government has failed to provide timely and adequate responses to ten of these FOIA requests, which constitutes a violation of the law. The EOIR has claimed it cannot locate any guidance issued to immigration judges concerning case dismissals and courthouse arrests, despite a copy of relevant guidance having been leaked to the public. Additionally, the EOIR has declined to search for records related to its coordination with ICE, while ICE has either ignored or delayed processing all requests directed to it.

“Our FOIA requests seek to shine a light on how ICE operates in immigration courts, where families are fighting to keep their families together and for their future,” said Rex Chen, supervising counsel for Immigrant Rights at LatinoJustice PRLDEF. “Instead of transparency, they have chosen secrecy, stonewalling, or have provided inadequate responses to our request. It is unacceptable to prolong this urgent matter.”

“Families’ futures are on the line. That’s why we need to better understand how these arrests at immigration courts are being carried out, and the degree to which supposedly independent and neutral agencies like the EOIR are pushing a mass deportation agenda. The public has a right to know what the EOIR and ICE are doing behind closed doors,” stated Chris Opila, staff attorney for transparency at the American Immigration Council.

Democracy Forward’s president and CEO, Skye Perryman, emphasized the importance of transparency, stating, “The public has a right to know when our government rewrites the rules to make mass arrests and deny people of due process — especially inside the very courtrooms meant to deliver justice. The administration cannot hide guidance that turns immigration courts into traps and accelerates deportations without fair hearings. We will not allow these agencies to operate in the shadows. Transparency is the first safeguard against abuse of power, and we’re in court to demand accountability.”

The lawsuit aims to compel the four agencies to fully comply with FOIA and release all documents responsive to seven of the requests. It also calls for the expedited disclosure of guidance directives and correspondence between ICE and the EOIR.

LatinoJustice PRLDEF has been advocating for over 50 years to create a more just society by challenging injustices through the rule of law. The organization focuses on empowering communities and fostering leadership through advocacy and education. For more information about LatinoJustice, visit www.LatinoJustice.org.

Democracy Forward Foundation is a national legal organization dedicated to advancing democracy and social progress through litigation, policy, public education, and regulatory engagement. More details can be found at www.democracyforward.org.

The American Immigration Council works to strengthen America by shaping perceptions and actions towards immigrants and immigration, aiming for a fair and just immigration system. The Council employs various advocacy strategies, including litigation, research, and communications, to protect immigrant rights and promote community integration. For updates, follow the Council on social media or visit their website.

Source: Original article

Neighbors Express Concerns Over AI-Driven Flying Taxis at LA Airport

Staff ReporterPolitics, Technology, Travel 0

Archer Aviation’s acquisition of Hawthorne Airport for $126 million aims to establish an air taxi network in Los Angeles, but local residents express concerns over noise and safety.

Archer Aviation has made a significant investment in the future of urban air travel by acquiring Hawthorne Airport for $126 million. This strategic move is part of the company’s plan to launch an air taxi network in Los Angeles ahead of the 2028 Olympics, featuring electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft powered by advanced artificial intelligence.

The acquisition includes the remaining 30 years on the airport’s master lease and an exclusive option to take control of the on-site fixed-base operator, pending city approval. The 80-acre airport site boasts approximately 190,000 square feet of terminals, office space, and hangars, making it an ideal location for an air taxi network designed to transform transportation in densely populated urban areas.

Archer plans to use Hawthorne Airport as the main operational hub for its air taxi services, with preparations underway to support transportation during the LA28 Olympic and Paralympic Games. The company aims to manage various aspects of operations, including takeoff scheduling and ground logistics. In its shareholder letter, Archer describes Hawthorne as a “plug-and-play” anchor hub for its Olympic plans, indicating that the site will be utilized for aircraft testing, maintenance, storage, and charging as it gears up for commercial service.

Additionally, the airport will serve as a testing ground for next-generation AI-powered aviation systems. These innovations are expected to enhance air traffic management, reduce turnaround times, and improve safety in congested airspace. Archer’s two-phase plan outlines a redevelopment of up to 200,000 square feet of hangars in the first phase, followed by the integration of AI air traffic and ground management systems in the second phase, aimed at creating a more efficient passenger experience.

United Airlines’ Chief Financial Officer, Michael Leskinen, expressed support for Archer’s initiative, stating, “Archer’s trajectory validates our conviction that eVTOLs are part of the next generation of air traffic technology that will fundamentally reshape aviation.” He emphasized the importance of leveraging cutting-edge technology to enhance safety and efficiency in busy airspaces, highlighting United’s investment in companies like Archer that are pioneering advancements in aviation infrastructure.

However, not everyone is enthusiastic about Archer’s plans for Hawthorne Airport. A local advocacy group, Hawthorne Quiet Skies, has voiced concerns about the acquisition, claiming they were blindsided by the announcement and that there was no prior engagement with residents regarding the airport’s transformation into a test site for AI-driven aviation technologies.

Residents living near the airport describe Hawthorne as one of the most densely packed airports in the United States, with homes situated on three sides. They have long complained about the noise generated by jets and helicopters, and a 2021 noise study conducted by the city identified over 160 homes and approximately 480 residents exposed to unhealthy noise levels. Despite these concerns, residents report that there has been “zero progress” on noise mitigation as the airport has shifted from small private planes to commercial traffic and now to a 24/7 eVTOL hub.

The advocacy group is also raising alarms about the safety of Archer’s AI initiatives, citing academic research that indicates current machine-learning systems in aviation struggle to manage unusual conditions and lack formal safety guarantees. They argue that the promises of cleaner, futuristic air taxis do not address the reality of Hawthorne being used as a live test site without adequate safeguards, updated federal noise regulations, or a comprehensive plan to compensate families if increased eVTOL traffic makes their homes unlivable.

In addition to the airport acquisition, Archer has reported significant financial progress, raising an additional $650 million in equity, bringing its total liquidity to over $2 billion. The company’s Midnight aircraft has also achieved new flight milestones, including a 55-mile flight at speeds exceeding 126 mph and a climb to 10,000 feet.

Archer is also expanding its global technology footprint, having acquired Lilium’s patent portfolio, which increases its total intellectual property assets to over 1,000. These patents encompass essential technologies such as ducted fans, high-voltage systems, and flight controls. The company has initiated test flights in the UAE and formed partnerships with Korean Air, Japan Airlines, and Sumitomo’s joint venture in Osaka and Tokyo.

The acquisition of Hawthorne Airport signifies a major step toward the realization of air taxis as a viable mode of transportation. If successful, this shift could lead to shorter travel times across major cities and quieter aircraft compared to traditional helicopters. For Los Angeles residents, the airport may soon become a key hub for rapid, point-to-point travel, especially for visitors attending significant events like the LA28 Olympics.

As Archer moves forward with its plans, the implications for local businesses and job creation in advanced aviation and clean electric travel are promising. However, the backlash from nearby residents raises critical questions about noise, safety, and community engagement in the development of this new transportation model.

Archer’s acquisition of Hawthorne Airport represents a pivotal moment in the quest to establish a functional air taxi network, providing the necessary aircraft, funding, and location to advance the industry. The company’s emphasis on AI-driven operations suggests that automated aviation may soon play a larger role in everyday life, even as regulators continue to navigate the complexities of integrating these aircraft into urban environments. The challenge remains for Archer to address the concerns of local communities while pursuing its ambitious vision for the future of urban air mobility.

Source: Original article

Access to Lawyers Critical During Trump’s Mass Deportation Campaign

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Politics 0

As the Trump administration escalates its deportation efforts, a new report underscores the crucial role of legal representation in immigration court proceedings.

Washington, D.C., Nov. 20 — A recent report from the American Immigration Council reveals that legal representation is vital for ensuring fairness in immigration court, particularly as the Trump administration intensifies its mass deportation and detention efforts.

The analysis, which examines over 2.28 million immigration court cases from fiscal years 2019 to 2024, indicates that having a lawyer significantly decreases the likelihood of deportation. The findings also highlight how case outcomes are influenced by factors such as detention status and the geographical location of the court, which are increasingly undermining the fairness of the immigration court system.

The report, titled Where Can You Win in Immigration Court? The Impact of Lawyers, Detention, Geography, and Policy, arrives at a critical time when the Trump administration is ramping up its deportation targets while simultaneously restricting access to due process.

“The Trump administration’s enforcement surge is exposing just how vulnerable people are when they go into immigration court without a lawyer,” said Adriel Orozco, the report’s author and senior policy counsel at the American Immigration Council. “Americans expect that every single person should get a fair hearing before a judge. While in the current moment of mass arrests and rapid removals that is increasingly difficult, having a lawyer is often critical in protecting a person’s right to argue their case.”

The report’s findings are striking:

Access to legal representation is a transformative safeguard in immigration court. From FY 2019 to FY 2024, 62 percent of immigrants without legal counsel were ordered deported, compared to just 27 percent of those who had legal representation.

The situation is even more dire for those in detention. In courts with the highest deportation rates, over 90 percent of cases involving detained individuals resulted in removal orders.

Geographical disparities in access to legal representation are pronounced. For example, non-detained immigrants in Honolulu had a legal representation rate of 70 percent, while in Harlingen, Texas, that rate plummeted to just 25 percent.

Moreover, the report highlights a significant shift in case outcomes between the Trump and Biden administrations. In FY 2019, nearly 80 percent of cases under Trump ended in removal orders, while that figure dropped to 40 percent under Biden in FY 2024.

The disparities outlined in the report are likely to worsen due to current policies under the Trump administration. Immigration courts are already grappling with unprecedented backlogs, and the ongoing mass deportation and detention campaign is exacerbating the chaos. This includes the reassignment and firing of immigration judges, the expansion of “fast-track” deportation processes, and other policies that limit individuals’ opportunities to present evidence or secure legal counsel. These developments raise serious concerns about access to justice for those in immigration court and the integrity of the judicial system itself.

“This report makes one thing clear: ensuring access to a qualified lawyer is a powerful way of protecting someone against unjust or erroneous deportation,” Orozco emphasized. “However, whether someone gets a lawyer depends far too much on their location, whether they are detained, and the prevailing policies. With detentions expected to surge due to record funding approved by Congress, having a lawyer is critical in a system that this administration is deliberately breaking down.”

The full report and an interactive data tool, which includes a court-by-court breakdown, are available for those interested in exploring outcomes based on location, detention status, and representation. This resource offers one of the most detailed insights into immigration court trends to date.

Source: Original article

Top House Democrat Commits to Ongoing Focus on High Prices

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chair Suzan DelBene emphasizes affordability as a key strategy for flipping three GOP seats to regain House majority in the 2026 midterms.

As the 2026 midterm elections approach, the chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), Suzan DelBene, has made it clear that the party’s focus will remain on affordability. In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, DelBene outlined the Democrats’ strategy to reclaim the House majority by flipping three Republican-held seats.

DelBene, who is leading the DCCC for a second consecutive election cycle, stated, “We’re going to hold Republicans accountable for their policies that are hurting American families.” The Democrats need to secure just three additional seats to regain control of the House for the first time in four years.

High prices and the rising cost of living were pivotal issues that contributed to the Republican victories in the 2024 elections, which saw Donald Trump reclaim the White House and the GOP maintain control of the Senate and House. However, the political landscape has shifted since then.

In the recent 2025 elections, Democrats experienced significant success, particularly in gubernatorial races in traditionally blue states like New Jersey and Virginia. They also achieved notable victories in battleground states such as Georgia and Pennsylvania, as well as in liberal strongholds like New York City and California.

DelBene pointed to these results as evidence that voters are increasingly concerned about affordability. “It was clear that when folks are talking about the biggest issues affecting their communities, affordability is at the forefront,” she said. “The rising costs people have seen as a result of the policies put in place by this administration and Republicans in Congress have been rejected by voters.”

A recent Fox News national poll revealed that three-quarters of respondents viewed the economy negatively, with many voters, including Republicans, reporting increased costs for essentials such as groceries, utilities, healthcare, and housing. The poll also indicated that voters largely blame the current economic situation on Trump, with nearly twice as many respondents attributing responsibility to him compared to President Biden.

Only 38% of those surveyed approved of Biden’s handling of the economy, while Trump’s approval rating stood at 41%, the lowest of his second term according to Fox News polling.

DelBene emphasized that affordability remains the top concern for families, citing rising costs in housing, food, healthcare, childcare, and energy. She criticized Republican promises to lower costs, labeling them as “big broken promises” that have left many feeling the impact of unfulfilled commitments.

In response, Republican Rep. Richard Hudson of North Carolina, chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee, acknowledged the economic challenges but attributed them to Biden’s policies. He stated, “House Republicans, working with President Trump, are going to fix it, and we’re working very hard to do that.” Hudson also expressed confidence that families would see increased take-home pay come tax season, crediting Trump and House Republicans for this outcome.

The DCCC has strategically linked vulnerable House Republicans to Trump, with DelBene arguing that Republican policies are detrimental to American families. She pointed to tariffs imposed by Trump that have raised costs and accused Republicans of prioritizing tax breaks for the wealthy while neglecting working families.

On the other hand, the NRCC has attempted to associate Democrats with the far-left policies of New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, suggesting that the entire Democratic Party has shifted leftward. Hudson asserted that every House Democrat must clarify their stance regarding Mamdani’s policies.

DelBene countered this narrative, asserting that Republicans lack a coherent message and are attempting to distract voters. “The folks in Iowa and Arizona aren’t focused on who the mayor of New York is,” she said. “They’re focused on who’s running for office, who’s going to stand up for them.”

As new national polls indicate a favorable outlook for Democrats in the 2026 House majority battle, DelBene remains cautious yet optimistic. “We take nothing for granted,” she stated, but expressed confidence that Democrats will successfully reclaim the House. “Our number one goal is making sure that we take back those gavels,” she emphasized, envisioning a Congress that works for the American people and serves as a check on the current administration.

Source: Original article

Ex-General: Saudis Unlikely to Leak F-35 Technology to China

Staff ReporterDefence, Politics, USA 0

Concerns over China’s history of stealing military technology fuel discussions regarding the potential sale of F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, according to military experts and retired commanders.

China’s ongoing efforts to acquire American military technology have become a significant concern in the debate surrounding the potential sale of F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia. This issue has drawn the attention of military experts and retired senior commanders.

Retired General Charles Wald, a former U.S. Air Force officer and deputy commander of EUCOM, highlighted that the United States has already denied similar requests from the United Arab Emirates and Turkey due to fears of technology transfer to China. “We told Turkey they’re not going to get the F-35. We told the UAE they’re not going to get it because there’s concern that there could be a transfer of technology to China,” Wald stated. He emphasized that the primary concern regarding Saudi Arabia’s acquisition of the F-35 is not the likelihood of the Saudis directly sharing the technology with China, but rather the potential for Chinese intelligence to exploit the capabilities of the aircraft. “I’m not as worried as some,” Wald added during a recent briefing at JINSA.

China expert Gordon Chang echoed these concerns, asserting that Beijing has already demonstrated its ability to infiltrate U.S. defense programs and should be assumed to be targeting the F-35 once again. “We should assume China has everything already. They already stole the whole plane once. They probably did it again,” Chang remarked in an interview with Fox News Digital.

Chang argued that the U.S. must weigh the risks of technology theft against the strategic benefits of strengthening ties with Saudi Arabia. “We need to cement the relationship with the crown prince, especially if that helps him sign off on an Abraham Accord. Let him have stripped-down F-35s,” he suggested. He further expressed greater concern about other U.S. partners, stating, “I’m much more worried about South Korea having the plane and turning over the plans to China.”

Chinese intelligence services have long been implicated in efforts to acquire American military and aerospace technology, including stealth designs, propulsion systems, and advanced avionics. U.S. officials have previously linked Chinese cyber actors to thefts targeting key American defense programs, including components similar to those found in fifth-generation fighters.

In light of these concerns, the United States is currently considering Saudi Arabia’s request for the F-35 as part of a broader negotiation that includes defense assurances and potential diplomatic progress with Israel. Retired Lieutenant General Robert Ashley, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, noted that the U.S. employs foreign military sales monitoring protocols to mitigate risks, although these protections are not foolproof. “One of the things that we do through foreign military sales is end-use case monitoring protocol,” Ashley explained. “We watch very closely how these kinds of advanced systems are used … but they’re not absolute.”

Despite the potential threat posed by China, retired commanders have indicated that they do not believe a Saudi acquisition of the F-35 would compromise Israel’s qualitative military edge. Wald emphasized that Israeli pilots, planners, and engineers possess a superior level of training and innovation compared to their counterparts in other countries. “There’s a big difference between the Israeli actual pilot capability than the other countries out there,” Wald stated. He also noted that Israel has integrated its own upgrades into the F-35, enhancing its capabilities. “The Israelis modified their own F-35 a little bit … they created or developed [additional capabilities] just prior to the attack on Iran,” he added.

Wald pointed out that even if the sale is approved, Saudi Arabia would not receive the aircraft for several years. “At the very least, there’s probably about a five-year window here before that would happen if they got the F-35,” he said.

Both Ashley and Wald indicated that in the long run, additional F-35s in the region could improve shared situational awareness and bolster collective defenses against Iran. Retired Vice Admiral Mark Fox noted that the fighter’s data-sharing architecture means that having more aircraft in allied hands enhances overall performance. “The one thing about F-35 is it talks to every other F-35,” Fox explained. “Having more F-35s in the region actually increases the capability of the coalition.”

Source: Original article

Inside a C-Suite Conversation with Indian-American Leaders Charles Mann and Anjali Ramakumaran

Staff ReporterNation, Politics 0

CEOs Charles Mann and Anjali Ramakumaran share insights on leadership, resilience, and transformation during a recent panel at the “Leadership @ Inflection Points” conference in Vienna, Virginia.

At the recent “Leadership @ Inflection Points” conference hosted by American Bazaar, CEOs Anjali Ramakumaran and Charles Mann engaged in a candid discussion about the challenges and triumphs of leadership. Their conversation centered on themes of reinvention, resilience, and the mindset necessary to navigate chaos and change.

Initially, the panel appeared to follow a familiar format: a seasoned CEO, a former Super Bowl champion turned entrepreneur, and a moderator guiding a group of executives through a dialogue on transformation. However, it quickly became evident that the discussion would delve into more personal territory.

Moderated by Rohit Tripathi, the panel titled “The CEO: Mobilizing for Transformation” took place on November 14 in Vienna, Virginia. It featured Ramakumaran, founder and CEO of Ampcus Inc., and Mann, a celebrated NFL player and CEO of Charles Mann Enterprises. Their insights provided a rare glimpse into what it truly takes to lead an enterprise—and oneself—through uncertainty.

The conversation kicked off with humor as Tripathi posed a light-hearted question about the role of humor in leadership. Ramakumaran responded enthusiastically, emphasizing its importance in maintaining perspective during challenging times. “Oh my god, we need to bring that every single day,” she said, highlighting how humor can serve as a pressure valve in high-stakes environments.

Mann, while initially downplaying his comedic abilities, shared a humorous anecdote about his marriage that resonated with the audience. He recounted a realization during the pandemic that his wife had always been the true leader in their household. “I realized she really is the boss,” he said, humorously noting that this revelation came after 36 years of marriage. This decision to formally appoint her as CEO of their company opened new avenues for growth and opportunity.

Transitioning from humor to more serious topics, Tripathi prompted the panelists to share their origin stories. Ramakumaran, who immigrated to the United States over 25 years ago, recounted how she founded Ampcus from her home’s basement while caring for her young child. Today, the company has grown into a global enterprise with over 3,000 employees and numerous offices worldwide.

“We’ve been in business for over 21 years,” she stated proudly. “We continue to grow, thrive, and succeed in the marketplace.” Her commitment to social responsibility is evident in her involvement with various nonprofit boards and her recognition as a leader among women-owned businesses.

Mann’s journey to the C-suite began in a vastly different arena: professional football. He played 12 seasons in the NFL, winning three Super Bowls, but his most significant transformation occurred after the death of his father when Mann was just 20 years old. This loss prompted him to reevaluate his life and priorities.

“My father’s death bought me life,” Mann reflected. This pivotal moment led him to approach both football and life with renewed purpose, ultimately guiding him toward entrepreneurship.

After a brief stint in television, Mann co-founded Alliant Merchant Services with Hall of Fame receiver Art Monk in 2004. He later established Charles Mann Enterprises, a construction company that he still operates today. “I am finding those inflection points,” he said, emphasizing the importance of leveraging his name and celebrity in business.

Throughout the discussion, a recurring theme emerged: transformational leaders possess the ability to identify gaps in the market and take bold actions to address them. Ramakumaran expressed her excitement when she sees challenges, stating, “When people say it can’t be done, I’m like, yes, it can be done.”

She recognized a shift in corporate needs during the early 2000s, understanding that companies were seeking partners who could effectively solve business problems. This insight, combined with her experience in helping firms establish operations in India, positioned her to launch Ampcus successfully.

Both leaders emphasized the importance of building strong teams to achieve their visions. “People should be considered as the center of your universe, period,” Ramakumaran asserted. She explained that Ampcus focused on hiring industry experts and technology specialists to address specific business challenges.

Mann echoed this sentiment, recalling how he and Monk built their team around their respective strengths. “We were doing a great job of using our strengths to build a company,” he noted, highlighting the importance of collaboration and leveraging individual talents.

As the conversation drew to a close, Tripathi asked each panelist for a mantra that guides them through difficult times. Ramakumaran shared her father’s wisdom: “Remember, there’s a solution to every single problem. You just gotta take a deep dive and explore.” She emphasized the importance of persistence and the ongoing hunger to create positive impact.

Mann’s mantra was simple yet profound: “It’s not how you start, it’s how you finish.” He expressed his enthusiasm for the journey ahead, stating, “I am not finished. I am just starting.”

In a room filled with leaders facing their own inflection points, the messages from Mann and Ramakumaran resonated deeply. They underscored that while chaos may be inevitable, the right mindset, team, and willingness to act can transform uncertainty into clarity and momentum.

Source: Original article

Crypto Prices Decline: Factors Contributing to the Recent Drop

Staff ReporterBusiness, Economy, Politics 0

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are experiencing significant volatility, prompting investors to brace for potential further declines in the market.

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are facing a period of intense volatility, leading many investors to speculate that more turbulence may lie ahead. The current market conditions suggest that the cryptocurrency landscape could be shifting.

“Bitcoin’s pullback is part of a broader shift in risk sentiment,” stated Haider Rafique, global managing partner at OKX, a prominent crypto exchange. This sentiment reflects a larger trend observed in financial markets, where Bitcoin has entered a bear market. This classification occurs when the price of an asset falls more than 20% from its recent peak, and Bitcoin has seen a staggering loss of over $600 billion in market value during its recent downturn, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Rafique noted that the market’s behavior in the coming days will be crucial in determining whether this situation represents a deeper reset or merely a sharp, temporary dip within an ongoing cycle. “Bitcoin has struggled as a result of selling pressure from long-term holders taking profits but also uncertainty around Fed policy, the liquidity environment, and other macro conditions,” explained Gerry O’Shea, head of global market insights at Hashdex Asset Management.

The market dynamics have shifted, with some buyers and sellers withdrawing from the cryptocurrency space. This withdrawal has resulted in fewer orders for Bitcoin, making its price more vulnerable to fluctuations. Peter Chung, head of Presto Research, remarked, “Bitcoin is under pressure in line with other risk assets, but its downside is amplified due to a crypto-specific factor — namely, the order books have gotten thinner in the aftermath of the October 10 liquidations, which hurt many market makers in the space.”

Ryan Rasmussen, head of research at Bitwise Asset Management, observed that the current market conditions have led some investors to feel uneasy. “Right now, some investors see sideways churn and get spooked,” he said. “But in our view, it’s the perfect opportunity for investors to build on existing Bitcoin positions, and for those who have been sidelined to enter the market.”

The cryptocurrency market, particularly Bitcoin, has faced significant challenges following the October 2025 liquidation event, which eliminated over $19 billion in leveraged positions. This event has resulted in thinner order books, contributing to increased volatility. Market participants are currently adjusting to these new conditions, with some short-term holders opting to sell while others seek to capitalize on price fluctuations.

The future trajectory of Bitcoin is likely to depend on the speed at which liquidity providers return to the market and whether macroeconomic pressures begin to ease. However, these factors remain uncertain. Despite the ongoing turbulence, cryptocurrency continues to attract attention as a speculative asset class. Yet, its stability and long-term growth prospects are still subjects of debate, making it crucial for investors to approach the market with caution and stay informed about ongoing developments.

Reduced liquidity and thinner order books have led to more pronounced price swings, impacting both short-term and long-term market participants. Despite these fluctuations, the cryptocurrency market remains appealing to investors, reflecting its ongoing significance in the financial landscape.

The future of cryptocurrency remains uncertain, yet it continues to draw considerable interest from investors, regulators, and financial institutions. Technological advancements, increased adoption by mainstream financial platforms, and evolving regulatory frameworks could significantly influence market stability and growth. At the same time, digital assets remain sensitive to macroeconomic conditions, liquidity fluctuations, and investor sentiment, making price movements potentially volatile.

Source: Original article

Nalin Haley Advocates Against Naturalized Citizens Holding Public Office

Staff ReporterConflict, Immigration, Politics 0

Nalin Haley sparked controversy by asserting that naturalized U.S. citizens should be barred from holding public office, igniting discussions on immigration and citizenship.

Nalin Haley, the son of former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and 2024 Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley, has ignited controversy with his recent comments regarding naturalized citizens in the United States. The 24-year-old stated that individuals who are not born in the U.S. should not be eligible for public office, claiming that growing up in America is essential for understanding the country.

Haley made these remarks during a conversation with conservative commentator Tucker Carlson, where he emphasized his belief that only those born in the United States should hold elected positions. This stance has drawn significant attention, particularly in light of his previous strong opposition to the H-1B visa program, which has predominantly benefited skilled workers from India.

In a separate interview, Haley expressed his frustration with the current job market, noting that many of his peers, despite graduating from prestigious institutions, have struggled to find employment. “We are seeing kids graduate with six figures in debt and not having a job to show for it,” he lamented during a discussion with Fox News. He highlighted that none of his friends, who graduated a year and a half ago, have secured jobs, and pointed to statistics indicating that 58% of recent college graduates are unemployed. Of those who are employed, he noted that half hold temporary positions or jobs that do not require a degree.

Haley’s comments have not gone unchallenged. He previously engaged in a heated exchange with journalist Mehdi Hasan, who reminded him of his family’s immigrant background. Hasan suggested that Haley’s anti-immigration rhetoric was hypocritical, considering that his grandfather, Ajit Singh Randhawa, immigrated to the United States from India in 1969. Randhawa, a Sikh immigrant from Punjab, faced similar anti-immigrant sentiments during his time in the U.S. and went on to have a distinguished academic career.

The irony of Haley’s remarks is underscored by the fact that his grandfather overcame significant challenges as an immigrant. After earning a master’s degree in biology and completing a PhD at the University of British Columbia, Randhawa joined the faculty at Voorhees College in South Carolina, contributing to the academic community for decades.

This debate comes at a time when the H-1B visa program is under scrutiny, with varying opinions within the Republican Party. Former President Donald Trump has recently softened his stance on immigration, leading to divisions within the MAGA base regarding the future of such visa programs.

As discussions around immigration and citizenship continue to evolve, Nalin Haley’s comments have reignited conversations about the role of naturalized citizens in American politics and the complexities of the immigration debate.

Source: Original article

Muslim Civil Rights Group CAIR Files Lawsuit Against Texas Governor Abbott

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, USA 0

A prominent Muslim civil rights organization is suing Texas Governor Greg Abbott over his designation of the group as a “foreign terrorist organization,” claiming it violates constitutional rights.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has filed a federal lawsuit challenging Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s recent designation of the organization as a “foreign terrorist organization” and a “transnational criminal organization.” The lawsuit, submitted by CAIR’s Dallas-Fort Worth and Austin chapters, seeks to overturn Abbott’s proclamation issued earlier this week.

In its lawsuit, CAIR argues that Abbott’s actions infringe upon both the U.S. Constitution and Texas state law. “This attempt to punish the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization simply because Governor Abbott disagrees with its views is not only contrary to the United States Constitution, but finds no support in any Texas law,” the group stated.

Founded in 1994, CAIR operates 25 chapters across the United States, with a small staff of eight employees and two contractors in Texas, as noted in the legal filing. The lawsuit comes in the wake of Abbott’s order, which not only labeled CAIR as a terrorist organization but also extended the same designation to the Muslim Brotherhood. Notably, federal authorities have never classified either group in this manner.

Abbott’s decree also imposes restrictions on CAIR’s ability to purchase land in Texas, citing a new statute aimed at curbing transactions linked to “foreign adversaries.” CAIR contends that Abbott’s designation is based on “inflammatory statements with no basis in fact,” selectively citing remarks from affiliates to portray the organization as sympathetic to terrorism.

CAIR-Texas expressed its commitment to defending constitutional rights in a statement, asserting, “CAIR-Texas and the Texas Muslim community are standing up for our constitutional rights by directly confronting Greg Abbott’s lawless attack on our civil rights.” The organization emphasized that it will not be intimidated by what it describes as smear campaigns from politicians who prioritize foreign interests over American values.

CAIR Litigation Director and General Counsel Lena Masri commented on the lawsuit, stating, “The lawsuit we have filed today is our first step towards defeating Governor Abbott again so that our nation protects free speech and due process for all Americans.” She further emphasized that no civil rights organization is safe if a governor can unilaterally label them as terrorist groups, restrict their activities, and threaten their existence.

The Muslim Legal Fund of America has also expressed support for CAIR-Texas, asserting the importance of defending constitutional rights. Attorney Charlie Swift stated, “Mr. Abbott’s unconstitutional proclamation undermines the very foundational notions of due process that our system depends upon and it must not stand.” He called for a collective effort to defeat what he described as Abbott’s latest attack on American freedoms.

This legal challenge comes amid a broader context of scrutiny faced by Muslim organizations in Texas. Earlier this year, Texas Republicans attempted to halt the development of a Muslim-centered community near one of the state’s largest mosques, the East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC). Officials claimed that the project aimed to create a Muslim-exclusive community governed by Islamic law, allegations that EPIC representatives have called misleading and dangerous. The U.S. Justice Department ultimately closed its federal civil rights investigation into the planned community without filing any charges or lawsuits.

The outcome of CAIR’s lawsuit against Governor Abbott could have significant implications for civil rights and free speech protections in Texas and beyond. As the legal proceedings unfold, the organization remains steadfast in its commitment to advocating for justice and equality.

Source: Original article

Putin Declares Health ‘Fine’ After Checkup, Refuses Blood Pressure Test

Staff ReporterHealth, Politics, USA 0

Vladimir Putin asserts his good health following a two-day medical examination, despite declining a blood pressure test during an artificial intelligence conference in Moscow.

Vladimir Putin has publicly stated that he is in good health after undergoing a two-day medical checkup, despite ongoing speculation regarding his physical condition. The Russian president made these remarks during the AI Journey forum in Moscow, where he was invited to test an AI-powered kiosk designed to measure users’ pulse and blood pressure through a fingertip scanner.

According to reports, Putin, 73, was surrounded by bodyguards when he addressed the audience, saying, “I recently had my annual checkup. It took two and a half days, including an overnight stay at the clinic. Thank God, everything is fine.” His comments come amid persistent rumors about his health, particularly following observations of bruising on his hands.

On November 9, at another event in Moscow, observers noted that Putin appeared to have a bruised or swollen hand. Ukrainian presidential advisor Anton Gerashchenko shared a close-up photo of Putin’s hand on social media platform X, claiming that his “veins are bulging” and suggesting that there may be something concerning about the Russian leader’s hands.

In March, speculation about Putin’s health intensified when President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine predicted that Putin “will die soon,” amid rumors that he may be suffering from cancer or having experienced strokes. Additionally, a video from a meeting in 2022 showed Putin gripping a table tightly, leading some to speculate about possible Parkinson’s disease or chronic pain.

During the AI forum, Putin also expressed his belief in the potential for humans to live up to 150 years. “It is probably possible to reach 150,” he remarked. “But it will always be too few, just like with money — always.” This is not the first time Putin has mused about longevity and the future of human life.

In a previous hot mic exchange with China’s Xi Jinping and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un at a summit in Beijing in September, Putin was overheard joking about biotechnology and organ transplants, stating, “The longer you live, the younger you become. Perhaps one day, we may even achieve immortality.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to the Kremlin for further comments regarding Putin’s health and his recent statements.

Source: Original article

Pramila Jayapal Introduces Bill to Curb Corporate Lobbying Influence

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Rep. Pramila Jayapal and Senator Elizabeth Warren have introduced the EXPERTS Act to combat corporate lobbying and restore transparency in federal rulemaking.

WASHINGTON, DC – On November 20, Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) unveiled new legislation aimed at addressing the growing concerns surrounding corporate influence in government and the erosion of federal regulatory frameworks. The proposed bill, known as the Experts Protect Effective Rules, Transparency, and Stability Act, or EXPERTS Act, seeks to enhance transparency, rebuild public trust, and reinforce expert authority in the federal rulemaking process.

The lawmakers contend that the bill is a necessary response to what they describe as the ongoing dismantling of regulatory safeguards initiated during the Trump administration. These safeguards are intended to ensure that regulations serve the public interest rather than corporate interests.

“Many Americans are taught in civics classes that Congress passes a law and that’s it, but the reality is that any major legislation enacted must also be implemented and enforced by the executive branch to become a reality,” Jayapal stated. She emphasized the importance of protecting public safety, warning that systems designed for this purpose are being compromised. “At a time when corporations and CEOs have outsized power, it is critical that we ensure that public interest is protected. This bill will level the playing field to ensure that laws passed actually work for the American people.”

Warren echoed Jayapal’s sentiments, asserting that the regulatory process has increasingly favored corporate interests over those of the general public. “Giant corporations and their armies of lobbyists shouldn’t get to manipulate how our laws are implemented,” she remarked. “While Donald Trump keeps selling away influence over our government, we’re fighting to ensure the rules are being written to help working Americans, not corporate interests.”

The introduction of the EXPERTS Act follows the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overturned the long-standing Chevron deference doctrine. This doctrine had previously instructed courts to defer to federal agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous laws. The lawmakers argue that the reversal of this doctrine grants courts broader authority to invalidate expert-driven regulations, thereby undermining essential protections related to worker safety, financial fairness, and environmental standards.

According to Jayapal and Warren, the current rulemaking process disproportionately favors industry lobbyists, who can exert significant influence over regulatory outcomes. They point out that companies often engage in private lobbying of regulators, fund studies that may appear scientific, and distort the anticipated impacts of stronger oversight. In contrast, the general public has limited opportunities to influence these processes.

The EXPERTS Act aims to reverse this trend through a series of comprehensive reforms. Key provisions of the bill include restoring Chevron-style deference, ensuring full transparency regarding the funding of studies submitted during the rulemaking process, and requiring public explanations when agencies withdraw proposed rules. Additionally, the legislation seeks to expedite rulemaking by eliminating private parties from the negotiated rulemaking process, reinstating a six-year limit for challenging agency actions in court, and creating new mechanisms to empower ordinary citizens. This includes imposing fines on corporations that submit misleading claims and establishing an Office of the Public Advocate.

By introducing the EXPERTS Act, Jayapal and Warren hope to create a regulatory environment that prioritizes the needs of the public over corporate interests, ultimately fostering a more equitable and transparent governance framework.

Source: Original article

New Jersey AAPI Celebrates 7th Annual Convention Under President Dr. Raj Bhayani

Staff ReporterCommunity, Health, Politics 0

The New Jersey State AAPI celebrated its 7th Annual Convention on November 15, 2025, in Somerset, showcasing community strength and professional excellence under the leadership of President Dr. Raj Bhayani.

On November 15, 2025, the New Jersey State AAPI proudly hosted its 7th Annual Convention at the Imperia Banquet Hall in Somerset, New Jersey. The event, led by President Dr. Raj Bhayani, attracted hundreds of physicians, healthcare leaders, and policymakers, marking a significant milestone for the organization.

Dr. Bhayani opened the evening by reflecting on the chapter’s growth since its inception in 2017. He emphasized the importance of mentorship, research, and a shared vision in advancing healthcare for residents of New Jersey. The success of the convention was attributed to the dedicated leadership of several key figures, including Chair of the Board Dr. Rachana Kulkarni, Past President Dr. Sudha Nahar, and Convention Chair Dr. Chetan Shah. Their meticulous coordination of logistics, finances, seating, and décor created a warm and inviting atmosphere for attendees.

The collaborative efforts of the NJ State AAPI’s Board Members, representing a diverse group of experts, ensured smooth operations and high engagement throughout the evening. Founders such as Dr. Hemant Patel and Dr. Kishore Ratkalkar played crucial roles in securing important sponsorships, while Dr. Binod Sinha highlighted the community’s support and expressed gratitude for their involvement.

The convention was proudly supported by seven Platinum Sponsors, including Robert Wood Johnson Hospital System and Hackensack Meridian Hospital System. Additionally, a record thirty exhibitors showcased leading healthcare technologies and pharmaceuticals, fostering valuable connections among attendees.

A highlight of the event was the presence of Chief Guest Mrs. Amruta Fadnavis, the First Lady of Maharashtra, who commended the impactful contributions of Indian American physicians. Special honors were awarded during the evening, including the Lifetime Achievement Award presented to Chirag Patel, co-founder of Amneal Pharmaceuticals, recognizing his significant contributions to the pharmaceutical sector and philanthropy.

Academic excellence was also a focal point of the convention, particularly through the expanded Research Symposium, which featured a record 85 submissions. Led by Dr. Atul Prakash and Dr. Subhasini Gowda, this segment showcased groundbreaking research from students, residents, and young physicians, reinforcing the chapter’s commitment to advancing medical knowledge.

The 7th Annual Convention celebrated the NJ State AAPI’s mission to strengthen physician networks, promote academic growth, and advocate for comprehensive healthcare. Dr. Bhayani expressed gratitude to all who contributed to the event, heralding it as one of the most successful in the chapter’s history and signaling a bright future for continued impact and innovation.

Source: Original article

Craigslist Scam Targets Vehicle Sellers with Fake Car Reports

Staff ReporterBusiness, Immigration, Politics 0

Fake vehicle report scams are targeting car sellers on platforms like Craigslist, leading to potential credit card fraud. Awareness of warning signs can help protect sellers from these schemes.

Selling a car online is often seen as a straightforward process. However, many sellers are increasingly encountering scams that involve fake demands for vehicle reports from unknown websites. These scams typically begin with a seemingly routine inquiry from a potential buyer, but they quickly lead to a payment page designed to steal credit card information.

Nick K., a resident of Washington, recently experienced this scam while attempting to sell his vehicle. He shared his observations in an email, noting, “In trying to sell a car, it has become apparent that there is a scam related to CarFax-type reports.” He described how the scam unfolds: a person expresses interest in the car but insists on obtaining a report from a specific service. Initially, Nick thought this might be a tactic to sell more reports, but he soon realized it was a method for harvesting credit card numbers and personal data.

Nick identified several warning signs that can indicate a scam. These include inquiries about accepting cash, questions that suggest the buyer has not read the advertisement, offers that exceed the listed price, and vague initial contact. “These are just the usual signs I am looking for when I am trying to decide if someone responding to a Craigslist or Facebook ad is legit,” he explained.

This scam has been proliferating across various online platforms, including Craigslist and Facebook Marketplace. It often begins with a message that appears entirely normal. For instance, a supposed buyer may text, “Is the 1985 F150 available?” followed by friendly but vague questions like, “OK, I’m interested in seeing it. When and where would be good for you?”

Once the seller responds, the scammer establishes just enough rapport to seem credible. The next step involves the scammer claiming they are serious about purchasing the vehicle but require a detailed report from a service that most sellers have never heard of.

In Nick’s case, after he provided the Craigslist link and vehicle details, the scammer replied with a suggestion to obtain an “Auto Smart Report,” complete with a link to the site. The message continued with, “Oh, I forgot to ask for your name? I’m Richard. Will you accept a cash payment? Let me know.” While this may sound harmless, the scam relies on enticing the seller to click the link.

The website linked in the message appears professional, promising a “Complete Vehicle History at Your Fingertips.” However, once the seller enters their information, they are not purchasing a report; instead, they are unwittingly providing their credit card details and personal data to criminals.

When Nick pushed back against the request for the report, the scammer intensified their pressure tactics, stating, “If you can show me the Auto Smart Report, that would be great, as it’s the most reliable and complete report. My offer to you is $7,000. I have no issue with that.” This tactic included increasing the offer by $500 to keep Nick engaged.

Scammers often employ various strategies to maintain the illusion of a legitimate transaction. However, once the seller pays for the fake report, the scammer typically disappears, having achieved their goal of harvesting financial information rather than purchasing the vehicle.

To protect oneself from such scams, it is crucial to remain vigilant. If you notice two or more suspicious signs, treat the inquiry as potentially fraudulent. Even the most convincing buyer could be a scammer, so taking proactive measures can safeguard your finances and personal data.

One of the most effective ways to avoid falling victim to these scams is to refrain from clicking on any links sent via text, email, or messaging apps. Such links often lead to phishing sites or malware downloads. Keeping devices protected with strong antivirus software and running regular scans can help block new threats.

Additionally, if a buyer insists on using an unfamiliar website, it is essential to stop immediately and verify the site’s legitimacy before sharing any financial or personal details. Considering a data removal service can also be beneficial, as it limits the availability of personal information that scammers might exploit.

When selling a vehicle, stick to reputable services like Carfax, AutoCheck, or NMVTIS. Including your vehicle’s VIN allows genuine buyers to run their own reports safely without needing your involvement.

It is also advisable to report suspicious messages directly to the platform and to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) at reportfraud.ftc.gov. Sharing details of these scams can help protect others from falling victim. If you suspect you have been scammed, contact your bank immediately, cancel your card, and monitor your account for unauthorized charges.

When meeting a buyer, choose a public place with security cameras, bring a friend, keep your phone charged, and document all communication. This scam thrives on the perception that a vehicle report is a routine request. Scammers apply pressure to act quickly, but it is crucial to slow down, verify, and stick to well-known services. Genuine buyers will accept a report you provide or will run one themselves.

Thanks to individuals like Nick K., more sellers can recognize these traps and protect themselves from potential financial loss and data theft.

Have you encountered buyers pushing for unusual report sites when selling online? What were your first clues that something was off? Share your experiences with us at Cyberguy.com.

Source: Original article

CDC Revises Stance on Vaccines and Autism After Years of Debate

Staff ReporterHealth Science, Politics 0

The CDC has revised its position on the potential link between vaccines and autism, acknowledging that previous claims lacked evidence and prompting a comprehensive assessment of autism causes.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has quietly updated its website regarding the controversial link between vaccines and autism. This change follows a comprehensive assessment initiated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to explore potential causes of autism.

The revised wording on the CDC’s site now states, “The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.” This marks a significant shift from the agency’s previous stance, which asserted that studies had shown no link between vaccinations and the development of autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

The CDC acknowledged that the statement asserting vaccines do not cause autism has been “historically disseminated” by federal health agencies to combat vaccine hesitancy. The agency’s earlier position was more definitive, claiming that extensive research had established no connection between vaccines and autism.

As part of its updated stance, the CDC indicated that the header “Vaccines do not cause autism” remains on the page, but it now includes an asterisk. This asterisk clarifies that the statement was retained due to a prior agreement rather than because of supporting evidence.

The Children’s Health Defense, an organization that has long questioned the safety of vaccines, praised the CDC’s updated position. Mary Holland, president and CEO of the organization, expressed optimism about the change. “Finally, the CDC is beginning to acknowledge the truth about this condition that affects millions, disavowing the bold, long-running lie that ‘vaccines do not cause autism,’” she told Fox News Digital.

Holland emphasized that no studies have definitively proven the claim that vaccines do not contribute to autism. She pointed out that many studies suggest vaccines could be a plausible primary cause of the condition. The HHS’s comprehensive assessment is expected to include investigations into plausible biological mechanisms and potential causal links related to autism.

In contrast, other medical organizations have firmly rejected the notion that vaccines contribute to autism. The American Academy of Pediatrics maintains on its website that “studies have repeatedly found no credible link between life-saving childhood vaccines and autism.” They further state that while research continues to uncover potential causes of autism, vaccines are not among them, and there is no single root cause of the disorder.

Current CDC data indicates a rising trend in autism diagnoses among children. For instance, among children aged 8 years born in 2014, approximately one in 31 (3.2%) were identified with autism spectrum disorder, a significant increase from one in 150 (0.67%) in the year 2000.

Fox News Digital reached out to healthcare professionals and the HHS for additional comments regarding the updated stance.

Source: Original article

Federal Judge Permits Texas AG to Challenge Harris County Bail Reforms

Staff ReporterElection, Law/Legal, Politics 0

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has received court approval to challenge Harris County’s bail reforms, asserting that the policies compromise public safety.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has secured a significant legal victory, as a federal judge has permitted him to intervene in a lawsuit concerning the 2019 Harris County misdemeanor bail reform consent decree.

In a statement released on Wednesday, Paxton emphasized the importance of a justice system that prioritizes the punishment of offenders and the protection of innocent citizens. He criticized what he described as the influence of “leftist judicial activists” and “liberal anti-prison organizations” that he claims have contributed to a less safe Texas by facilitating the release of criminals back onto the streets.

“I will do everything in my power to reverse this disastrous policy and uphold the law,” Paxton stated, underscoring his commitment to addressing the bail reform measures that he believes are detrimental to public safety.

The O’Donnell Consent Decree originated from a 2016 class-action lawsuit that contended Harris County’s previous bail practices were unconstitutional. The lawsuit argued that individuals charged with misdemeanors were being detained solely due to their inability to pay cash bail.

A judge approved the consent decree in 2019, which effectively eliminated most cash bail for misdemeanor offenses. It mandated the release of individuals on unsecured bonds and established an independent monitor to ensure compliance with the new regulations.

With the recent ruling, Paxton’s office is now positioned to seek the termination of the consent decree. They argue that the decree not only contravenes Texas law but also poses a threat to public safety.

According to Paxton’s office, the consent decree has allowed “radical judges” to release criminals more easily into Harris County communities. They further contend that liberal activists have attempted to broaden the decree’s application, despite existing state laws that enforce stricter bail standards.

“General Paxton seeks to vacate the decree and ensure that the rights of Harris County citizens are represented in court,” the statement from his office concluded.

This legal battle highlights the ongoing tensions surrounding bail reform in Texas, as advocates for reform argue for a more equitable system, while opponents like Paxton assert that such reforms compromise public safety.

As the case progresses, it will likely draw attention from various stakeholders, including law enforcement, civil rights advocates, and the general public, all of whom are invested in the implications of bail reform on community safety and justice.

Source: Original article

Trump Advocates for Unified Federal Oversight of AI Regulation

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, Technology 0

Former President Donald Trump advocates for a unified federal standard for regulating artificial intelligence to prevent over-regulation by individual states.

Former President Donald Trump expressed concerns on Tuesday regarding the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) in the United States. He emphasized the necessity for a single federal standard to govern AI, warning that a fragmented approach could stifle innovation.

“Overregulation by the States is threatening to undermine this Growth Engine,” Trump stated in a social media post. He urged the need for a cohesive federal framework rather than a “patchwork of 50 State Regulatory Regimes.”

The current regulatory landscape in the United States has been characterized by a cautious, sector-focused approach aimed at balancing innovation with risk management. Various federal agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), have issued guidelines to promote transparency, safety, and non-discrimination in AI systems.

In contrast to the European Union, which has implemented a comprehensive AI regulatory framework through the EU AI Act, the U.S. lacks a sweeping federal law governing AI as of 2025. While the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) has released guidance on ethical AI and risk assessment, these standards are not universally enforced across all sectors.

Congress has held hearings to address the risks associated with AI technologies, such as deepfakes, bias, and autonomous systems. However, no significant federal legislation regarding liability or safety has been enacted thus far. Consequently, the U.S. regulatory approach heavily relies on state-level regulations and public-private partnerships to ensure AI safety and transparency.

The collaboration between federal agencies, private industry, and academic institutions is a cornerstone of the U.S. approach to AI regulation. This strategy aims to foster innovation while addressing the risks associated with advanced technologies. States like California have taken the lead in implementing regulations that mandate transparency in AI models, safety incident reporting, and protections for whistleblowers.

Despite these advancements at the state level, the timeline and scope of future federal legislation remain uncertain. Ongoing debates focus on whether to introduce mandatory federal standards or liability frameworks for AI technologies.

In his recent social media post, Trump called on lawmakers to consider incorporating the federal standard into a separate bill or including it in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), a key piece of defense policy legislation.

As AI technologies become increasingly integrated into daily life, the demand for clear and consistent regulatory frameworks is more critical than ever. Ensuring that AI systems operate safely, transparently, and without bias is essential for maintaining public trust, particularly in high-stakes sectors such as healthcare, finance, and national security.

State-level innovations, including mandatory reporting of AI-related safety incidents and whistleblower protections, serve as practical examples of how effective oversight can be achieved without hindering innovation.

However, the ongoing discussions surrounding a unified federal AI standard underscore the tension between the need for uniformity and the desire for flexibility. While a national framework could simplify compliance and reduce conflicting regulations across states, the specifics of such legislation and its potential impact on innovation remain unclear.

As the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, the balance between technological leadership and public safety will be crucial in guiding the responsible deployment of AI technologies.

Source: Original article

Trump Criticizes ABC Reporter and Network License During White House Exchange

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

President Donald Trump criticized ABC News correspondent Mary Bruce during a White House exchange, calling her a “terrible reporter” and questioning the network’s broadcast license.

President Donald Trump took aim at ABC News correspondent Mary Bruce on Tuesday, labeling her a “terrible reporter” during a contentious exchange at the White House. His comments came in response to Bruce’s probing questions regarding the appropriateness of the president’s family engaging in business dealings in Saudi Arabia while he remains in office.

Bruce, who serves as ABC’s chief White House correspondent, was one of the select reporters permitted into the Oval Office for a meeting between Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. During the session, she confronted the crown prince about U.S. intelligence assessments that implicated him in the 2018 murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi national and Virginia resident known for his critical stance toward the Saudi government.

“Your Royal Highness, the U.S. intelligence concluded that you orchestrated the brutal murder of a journalist. 9/11 families are furious that you are here in the Oval Office. Why should Americans trust you? And the same to you, Mr. President,” Bruce asked, directing her questions to both leaders.

As Bruce continued to press for answers, Trump interjected, asking which outlet she represented before dismissing ABC as “fake news.” He defended his family’s business ties in Saudi Arabia and downplayed the intelligence community’s conclusions regarding the crown prince’s involvement in Khashoggi’s death, stating that “a lot of people didn’t like” Khashoggi.

In response to Bruce’s inquiries, Prince Mohammed admitted that Khashoggi’s killing was a painful incident and described it as “a huge mistake.” However, Trump’s frustration with Bruce escalated as she continued to challenge him. After her third question, which focused on why the White House was waiting for Congress to act before releasing information related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s correspondence, Trump expressed his discontent.

“It’s not the question that I mind,” Trump stated. “It’s your attitude. I think you are a terrible reporter. It’s the way you ask these questions.”

After briefly addressing the Epstein question, Trump returned to his criticism of Bruce, claiming that “people are wise to your hoax.” He further suggested that ABC’s broadcast license should be reconsidered, asserting, “I think the license should be taken away from ABC because your news is so fake and it’s so wrong.”

Trump referenced FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, whose agency is responsible for overseeing licensing for local broadcast stations, implying that the chairman should investigate the network’s credibility. He added, “When you’re 97% negative to Trump, and then Trump wins the election in a landslide, that means, obviously, your news is not credible. And you’re not credible as a reporter.”

ABC News did not respond to Trump’s remarks on that day. In contrast, Bloomberg News reacted after Trump referred to one of its reporters, Catherine Lucey, as “piggy” during a recent question-and-answer session aboard Air Force One. Reuters also shared a video clip of Trump calling Lucey “quiet piggy” on its Instagram account.

As the exchange between Trump and Bruce unfolded, it underscored the ongoing tensions between the president and the media, particularly regarding the coverage of his administration and its dealings with foreign leaders.

Source: Original article

Google CEO Warns No Company Is Immune to AI Bubble

Staff ReporterBusiness, Election, Technology 0

Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet, warns that no company will be immune to the potential collapse of the AI boom, citing both excitement and irrationality in the current market.

Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google-parent Alphabet, has stated that no company will remain unscathed if the current boom in artificial intelligence (AI) firms collapses. His comments come amid rising valuations and significant investments that have sparked concerns of a potential bubble in the market.

In an interview with the BBC, Pichai described the ongoing wave of AI investment as an “extraordinary moment.” However, he also pointed out the presence of “elements of irrationality” in the market, drawing parallels to the warnings of “irrational exuberance” that characterized the dotcom era.

“We can look back at the internet right now. There was clearly a lot of excess investment, but none of us would question whether the internet was profound,” Pichai noted. “I expect AI to be the same. So I think it’s both rational and there are elements of irrationality through a moment like this.”

Pichai emphasized that no company, including Google, would be immune to the risks associated with the AI market. Nevertheless, he expressed confidence in Alphabet’s unique position, citing the company’s ownership of a comprehensive “full stack” of technologies—from chips to YouTube data, models, and frontier science. This, he believes, will help the company navigate any potential turbulence in the AI sector.

During the interview, which took place at Google’s headquarters in California, Pichai also discussed Alphabet’s plans for AI development in the UK. He mentioned that the company will invest in “state of the art” research, particularly at its key AI unit, DeepMind, located in London. In September, Alphabet committed £5 billion (approximately $6.58 billion) over two years to enhance UK AI infrastructure and research, which includes establishing a new data center and further investment in DeepMind.

Pichai addressed various topics during the interview, including energy requirements, the slowing of climate targets, and the accuracy of AI models. He noted that Google plans to begin training AI models in Britain, a move that UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer hopes will help position the country as the world’s third AI “superpower,” following the United States and China.

He also warned about the “immense” energy demands associated with AI development, acknowledging that Alphabet’s net-zero targets would be delayed as the company scales up its computing power. While he recognized that the energy needs of its expanding AI operations would impact the pace of progress toward climate goals, he reiterated Alphabet’s commitment to achieving net zero by 2030 through investments in new energy technologies. “The rate at which we were hoping to make progress will be impacted,” he said.

Pichai characterized AI as “the most profound technology” humanity has worked on, stating that society will need to navigate the disruptions it brings while also recognizing the new opportunities it creates.

As discussions around the sustainability of AI valuations continue, broader markets in the U.S. have already felt the effects of inflated AI valuations. British policymakers have also raised concerns about the risks of a bubble in the AI sector.

Other executives have echoed Pichai’s concerns regarding the AI bubble. Jarek Kutylowski, CEO of German AI firm DeepL, and Hovhannes Avoyan, CEO of Picsart, recently expressed similar apprehensions in an interview with CNBC.

Source: Original article

Honda Resumes Regular Production at North American Plants After Chip Shortages

Staff ReporterBusiness, Economy, Politics 0

Honda Motor plans to gradually resume normal operations at its North American assembly plants, signaling an easing of production disruptions caused by a chip shortage.

Honda Motor Co. announced that it will begin gradually resuming normal operations at its North American assembly plants starting Monday. This decision comes as production disruptions linked to a shortage of Nexperia chips appear to be easing, according to a report by Reuters.

The company had previously halted output at its plant in Mexico and adjusted production schedules at its facilities in the United States and Canada due to the ongoing chip shortage. A spokesperson for Honda indicated on Tuesday that the company has secured a certain level of chip supply, including sourcing alternative components. However, the spokesperson cautioned that the planned return to regular operations could change, as the situation remains fluid.

The automotive industry has been grappling with supply chain challenges since 2020, but the latest shortage has been exacerbated by geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China. Nexperia, a chip manufacturer, is owned by the Chinese company Wingtech Technology Co. but was taken over by the Dutch government amid rising pressure from the U.S. government. On October 4, the Chinese commerce ministry issued an export control notice that prohibited Nexperia China and its subcontractors from exporting specific finished components and sub-assemblies produced in China.

Honda was notably the first automaker to reduce its supply in response to this issue. In a significant development, China has since lifted its export controls on computer chips that are essential for automobile production. The Chinese commerce ministry announced that it has granted exemptions for exports made by Chinese-owned Nexperia for civilian use.

Additionally, China has paused an export ban on certain materials critical to the semiconductor industry destined for the U.S. and has suspended port fees for American ships. These actions represent a thawing of trade tensions between the U.S. and China, following an agreement in October between President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump to reduce tariffs and pause other trade measures for one year.

Volkswagen’s chief in China, Ralf Brandstaetter, confirmed that the supply of Nexperia chips has resumed, stating, “There have already been initial exports.” He noted that following the agreement with the United States, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce reacted quickly, announcing that it would grant short-term special permits for exports.

Brandstaetter also highlighted that the sustainability of this supply chain will depend largely on the ongoing relations between the United States and China. While production in China remains unaffected, the overall situation continues to be uncertain.

As Honda prepares to ramp up production, the automotive industry watches closely to see how these developments will impact supply chains and production capabilities in the coming months.

Source: Original article

Cloudflare Outage Disrupts Major Websites, Including X and ChatGPT

Staff ReporterPolitics, Technology, USA 0

A widespread Cloudflare outage on Tuesday caused significant disruptions, affecting access to major platforms including X and ChatGPT, leaving users unable to connect.

A major internet disruption occurred on Tuesday, resulting in a digital blackout for many users as a widespread outage at Cloudflare disabled access to several popular platforms.

Among the affected sites were social media networks like X, AI chatbot services such as ChatGPT, and film review platform Letterboxd. Users attempting to access these sites encountered error messages indicating that Cloudflare’s technical failure was the cause of the loading issues.

During the outage, ChatGPT displayed a message stating, “Please unblock challenges.cloudflare.com to proceed,” highlighting the extent of the disruption.

In response to the incident, Cloudflare acknowledged the issue, stating, “Cloudflare is aware of, and investigating an issue which potentially impacts multiple customers.” The company promised to provide further details as more information became available.

Cloudflare plays a crucial role in maintaining the smooth operation of the internet. The company provides essential infrastructure that enables websites to load quickly, remain secure, and handle sudden surges in traffic. Its services are designed to protect platforms from cyber threats, including distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, ensuring that millions of users can access these sites without interruption.

The outage raised concerns among users and businesses alike, as many rely on Cloudflare’s services for their online operations. The incident serves as a reminder of the interconnected nature of the internet and the potential for widespread disruptions when key infrastructure providers experience issues.

As the situation develops, users and businesses are left waiting for updates from Cloudflare regarding the resolution of the outage and the restoration of services.

According to Independent, the company is actively working to resolve the issues affecting its customers.

Source: Original article

Pope Leo XIV Backs US Bishops’ Criticism of Trump Immigration Raids

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics, Religion 0

Pope Leo XIV has expressed strong support for U.S. bishops condemning the Trump administration’s immigration raids, urging compassion and dignity for migrants.

Pope Leo XIV has firmly backed the U.S. Catholic bishops in their condemnation of the Trump administration’s immigration sweeps, calling for Americans to treat migrants with respect and dignity. His comments came during a press conference on Tuesday, where he was asked about a “special message” adopted by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops during their recent general assembly in Baltimore.

The bishops criticized President Donald Trump’s mass deportation agenda and the “vilification” of migrants, highlighting the fear and anxiety that immigration raids have instilled in communities across the nation. They expressed concern over the conditions in detention centers and the lack of pastoral care available to migrants held there.

“We are disturbed when we see among our people a climate of fear and anxiety around questions of profiling and immigration enforcement,” the bishops’ statement read. “We are saddened by the state of contemporary debate and the vilification of immigrants. We are concerned about the conditions in detention centers and the lack of access to pastoral care,” they added, opposing “the indiscriminate mass deportation of people.”

Pope Leo, the first American pope, commended the bishops’ message and encouraged both Catholics and all people of goodwill to listen to migrants and treat them humanely, regardless of their legal status in the United States. “I think we have to look for ways of treating people humanely, treating people with the dignity that they have,” he stated. “If people are in the United States illegally, there are ways to treat that. There are courts, there’s a system of justice.”

The pope has a history of urging local bishops to address social justice issues, and Catholic leaders have been vocal in their criticism of Trump’s mass deportation policies. The fear of immigration raids has reportedly led to a decline in Mass attendance at some parishes.

Earlier this year, the federal government reversed a directive from the Biden administration that had prohibited immigration agents from conducting raids in sensitive locations such as churches, schools, and hospitals. This change has further intensified the concerns voiced by the bishops and the pope.

Pope Leo acknowledged the challenges within the U.S. immigration system but emphasized that no one is advocating for open borders. He affirmed that every country has the right to determine who can enter and the methods by which they do so. However, he expressed dismay at the treatment of long-term residents who have lived in the U.S. for many years. “But when people are living good lives, and many of them for 10, 15, 20 years, to treat them in a way that is extremely disrespectful to say the least — and there’s been some violence unfortunately — I think that the bishops have been very clear in what they said,” he remarked as he left the papal country house south of Rome.

In closing, Pope Leo invited all people in the United States to listen to the concerns of migrants, reinforcing the bishops’ call for compassion and understanding.

Source: Original article

Texas Investigates USTA for Alleged Violation of Women’s Sports Law

Staff ReporterPolitics, Women 0

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has initiated an investigation into the U.S. Tennis Association Texas League for potential violations of a law prohibiting biological males from competing in women’s sports.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched an investigation into the U.S. Tennis Association (USTA) Texas League concerning possible violations of state law that bans biological males from participating in women’s sports. This inquiry aligns with a broader Republican movement across the nation aimed at restricting transgender participation in female athletics, with proponents arguing that such measures are essential for maintaining fairness and safety in competition.

In a statement, Paxton expressed his commitment to defending the rights of female athletes, stating, “We will defeat the radical left, which is obsessed with crushing the dreams of so many girls by allowing men to compete against women in sports.”

As part of the investigation, Paxton’s office has issued a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) to the USTA Texas League. This demand seeks documentation and policies related to the participation of transgender athletes in women’s matches. The attorney general’s office aims to ascertain whether the USTA’s practices contravene the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act or other consumer protection laws.

“If USTA is allowing biological males in women’s matches and misleading players about who they are competing against, my office will take all necessary action within our power to defend Texas women and girls,” Paxton added.

The CID specifically requests information on how players are informed about “delusional men competing under the guise of calling themselves ‘transgender’ competitors.” In response to the investigation, the USTA has filed a lawsuit against Paxton’s office, challenging the CID and the claims it is based upon.

This investigation is not Paxton’s first foray into the contentious issue of transgender participation in sports. Earlier this year, he filed a lawsuit against the NCAA over its transgender eligibility policy, which permitted biological males to practice with women’s teams but barred them from competing. Paxton accused the NCAA of failing to comply with a previous executive order issued by former President Donald Trump that prohibited biological men from competing in women’s sports.

Paxton’s legal actions against transgender inclusion in women’s athletics have also extended to U.S. Masters Swimming and various local school boards. This is part of a larger Republican initiative to enforce Texas’ gender-based athletic laws more stringently.

The ongoing investigation and legal battles highlight the contentious debate surrounding transgender athletes’ participation in sports, reflecting broader societal divisions on the issue. As this situation develops, it remains to be seen how it will impact the landscape of women’s sports in Texas and beyond.

Source: Original article

Ajay Bhutoria Addresses ‘Go Back to India’ Abuse Against Indian-Americans

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, USA 0

Ajay Jain Bhutoria has condemned the rise of anti-Indian American hate, attributing it to MAGA extremists and inflammatory remarks from public figures like Eric Trump.

Ajay Jain Bhutoria has issued a strong condemnation of the increasing wave of anti-Indian American hate, which he attributes to MAGA extremists and the reckless statements made by figures such as Eric Trump.

“I am personally bombarded with hundreds of racist comments on almost every single post I make on X — ‘Go back to India,’ slurs, threats, and worse — all from MAGA accounts,” Bhutoria stated. He emphasized that this hostility is a direct result of ongoing anti-immigrant scapegoating. “The very same week CNN exposed how MAGA’s rhetoric has turned Indian Americans into the latest target of surging hate crimes, Eric Trump smeared New York Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani by claiming he ‘hates the Indian population.’ The hypocrisy is staggering. Your family’s rhetoric is literally endangering Indian Americans, Eric — spare us the fake concern.”

Bhutoria highlighted the contributions of Indian Americans to the United States, stating, “While we are told to ‘go back home,’ Indian Americans are busy running America forward. We lead Google, Microsoft, Adobe, IBM, and dozens of Fortune 500 companies. We are the doctors saving your lives, the engineers building your future, the entrepreneurs creating millions of American jobs, and the highest tax-paying community in the nation.”

He continued, “We gave America Vice President Kamala Harris, NASA astronauts, Nobel laureates, and countless small-business owners who keep Main Street alive. Yet this is the thanks we get — coordinated online hate mobs and real-world threats.”

Bhutoria further criticized the notion that such behavior falls under the umbrella of free speech, stating, “This is not ‘free speech.’ This is stochastic terrorism dressed up as politics. Indian Americans will not be intimidated or silenced.”

He called for leaders from both political parties to denounce this bigotry unequivocally and to take meaningful action to protect the communities that contribute to the nation’s greatness. “We demand that leaders on both sides of the aisle denounce this bigotry in the strongest terms and take real action to protect the communities that make America the greatest nation on Earth,” he asserted.

Ajay Jain Bhutoria is a former National Finance Committee Member and an advisor to President Biden on the President’s Advisory Commission on Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders.

Source: Original article

New Jersey AAPI Holds 7th Annual Convention Led by Dr. Raj Bhayani

Staff ReporterCommunity, Education, Politics 0

The New Jersey State AAPI celebrated its 7th Annual Convention, highlighting unity and academic excellence under the leadership of President Dr. Raj Bhayani.

Somerset, NJ – November 15, 2025: The New Jersey State AAPI proudly celebrated its 7th Annual Convention at the Imperia Banquet Hall, marking a significant milestone under the presidency of Dr. Raj Bhayani. The event brought together hundreds of physicians, hospital executives, business leaders, and policymakers for an inspiring evening dedicated to unity, academic excellence, and community leadership.

In his welcome address, Dr. Bhayani reflected on the organization’s remarkable journey since its founding in 2017, emphasizing its expanding mission to unite physicians across New Jersey. “This convention is a celebration of what we have built together,” Dr. Bhayani stated. “Our collective strength comes from collaboration, mentorship, research, and a shared vision for better healthcare.”

The success of the 7th Annual Convention was made possible through exceptional leadership and teamwork. Dr. Rachana Kulkarni, Chair of the Board of Trustees, provided strategic oversight and ensured strong participation from the Robert Wood Johnson Leadership Team. Dr. Sudha Nahar, Past President, worked diligently on logistics, ensuring seamless coordination throughout the event.

Convention Chair Dr. Chetan Shah, President of the New Jersey Medical Board, led the overall planning with precision, supported by Co-Chairs Dr. Sumul Rawal and Dr. Subhasini Gowda, who collaborated closely with multiple committees. Dr. Bhavi Patel streamlined and organized the financial operations, ensuring clarity, accuracy, and smooth budgeting. Dr. Narinder Dhillon handled seating arrangements, creating a warm and organized atmosphere for guests, while Dr. Bharati Deka enhanced the evening’s visual appeal with elegant decor.

The event’s success was deeply supported by the teamwork and dedication of NJ State AAPI’s Board Members, whose collective effort powered every facet of the convention. The Board includes Dr. Kusum Panjabi, Dr. Ranjita Sengupta, Dr. Shridevi Shah, Dr. Nilesh Jariwala, Dr. Raj Patel, Dr. Samira Maganti, Dr. Vivek Bansal, Dr. Sanket Ruparelia, Dr. Jay Patel, Dr. Sunita Kanamury, Dr. Payal Parikh, Dr. Parag Patel, Dr. Ishan Patel, Dr. Suresh Belani, and Dr. Nidhi Goyal, along with Dr. Prakash Paragi.

The unity, coordination, and commitment of the Board were essential in shaping a memorable and impactful convention. The founders of NJ State AAPI also played a vital role in the event’s success. Dr. Hemant Patel secured major sponsorship from CareOne, while Dr. Kishore Ratkalkar facilitated participation and sponsorship from Hackensack Meridian Health. Dr. Binod Sinha expressed appreciation and gratitude for the leadership, volunteers, partners, and supporters who contributed to the event.

This year’s convention achieved new heights with an outstanding lineup of supporters. NJ State AAPI proudly recognized its seven Platinum Sponsors: Robert Wood Johnson Hospital System, Hackensack Meridian Hospital System, Staffingly, Doradus Partners, Coligomed, CareOne, and Wall Street Alliance Group. The event was further supported by eight Corporate Sponsors, demonstrating broad community and industry collaboration.

The convention also showcased a record thirty booth exhibitors, featuring leading healthcare and pharmaceutical innovators, including Abbott, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, and other top pharmaceutical and medical technology companies. Their participation created a vibrant expo environment that highlighted cutting-edge solutions and fostered valuable networking opportunities.

Adding distinction to the celebration, Mrs. Amruta Fadnavis, First Lady of Maharashtra, graced the convention as the Chief Guest, delivering words of encouragement and praising the contributions of Indian American physicians in the United States. A major highlight of the evening was the presentation of the Lifetime Achievement Award to Chirag Patel, Co-Founder of Amneal Pharmaceuticals, recognizing his remarkable contributions to the pharmaceutical industry and his enduring commitment to community well-being.

The convention also marked an academic highlight with an expanded Research Symposium, which received a record 85 submissions from students, residents, and young physicians. The scientific sessions were led by Dr. Atul Prakash and Dr. Subhasini Gowda, showcasing innovative research and reinforcing NJ State AAPI’s commitment to academic advancement.

The 7th Annual Convention underscored NJ State AAPI’s mission to strengthen the physician community, foster academic growth, and advance healthcare for all New Jersey residents. The evening celebrated achievement, collaboration, and forward momentum.

President Dr. Raj Bhayani expressed deep gratitude to the leadership team, Board, volunteers, sponsors, partners, exhibitors, and the Imperia staff for delivering one of the most successful conventions in NJ State AAPI’s history.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Author Yakub Mathew Highlights Maha Kumbh 2025 at IAAC Festival

Staff ReporterCulture, Election, Religion 0

The launch of Yakub Mathew’s book, *Seeking the Infinite: Maha Kumbh 2025*, sparked a vibrant dialogue on spirituality and culture at the IAAC Literary Festival in New York City.

The Indo-American Arts Council’s Literary Festival became a lively forum for spiritual and cultural dialogue with the launch of Yakub Mathew’s literary debut, *Seeking the Infinite: Maha Kumbh 2025*, on Sunday, November 16, 2025. The event took place at the prestigious International House in New York City and attracted seekers, scholars, and skeptics from around the world.

This gathering offered a profound exploration of faith, transcendence, and the enduring spiritual energy that characterizes India’s legendary Maha Kumbh Mela, a festival renowned for its significance in Hindu culture.

The unveiling of *Seeking the Infinite* was marked by the presence of Sadhguru, who officially released the book in front of an audience of over 600 attendees filling Davis Hall at the International House.

Following the book launch, a thought-provoking panel discussion was moderated by branding consultant Suhel Seth. The panel featured esteemed figures such as Harvard scholar Diana Eck, Rabbi Scott Matous, spiritual master Gurudev Sri Anish, and the Very Rev. Winnie Varghese, Dean of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine. Their discussion was characterized by honest inquiry and resonant interfaith dialogue.

*Seeking the Infinite* is described as “a living chronicle of spiritual encounters where faith traditions meet in humility and the sacred becomes a shared language.” The book comprises a tapestry of essays, dialogues, and reflections that take readers from the riverside rituals of the Maha Kumbh to intimate rooftop conversations. It encourages a shift in perspective, urging readers to view the festival not merely as a spectacle but as a “crucible of human yearning—for meaning, belonging, and transcendence.”

Diana Eck praised the book for its inclusive and pluralist spirit, noting, “You invite them to share their own… it’s multi-vocal with lots of different voices… it brings together your own sense of the importance of attenuating the differences between religions to a real interfaith vision.”

The anthology features insights from over fifty renowned personalities, weaving together diverse perspectives. Its foreword, contributed by Dr. Shashi Tharoor, Muzaffar Ali, and Anupam Kher, adds depth and cultural context. Tharoor remarked, “This coffee-table book is more than a collection of photographs; it is a window into the very essence—Mahima—of the Maha Kumbh. Here, each spread invites the reader to pause, to feel, and to remember that the search for the divine is both an inward journey and an outward celebration of our shared humanity.”

During the panel discussion, the complex relationship between religion and spirituality was explored. Suhel Seth posed a provocative question: “If you were given a choice, would you want the person to be religious or spiritual? You can only choose one…” This sparked dynamic and thoughtful exchanges among the panelists.

Rabbi Scott Matous emphasized the interplay between action and faith, stating, “When I give charity before I pray, when I give a helping hand, when I visit the sick, when I give honor to my parents, when I share love to a stranger. I’m connecting to God, because we are considered b’tzelem Elohim, the image of God.”

Gurudev Sri Anish championed the importance of inquiry and transformation, asserting, “Any system which kills the spirit of inquiry in asking questions… that doesn’t work. That’s when religion loses. If your version of religion or truth makes you transformational… your version of religion is working.”

Rev. Winnie Varghese offered a nuanced perspective on the dual nature of religion, stating, “Religion is used as a tool of social control, absolutely, and generates violence from conflict… but I actually think it comes, obviously, from a very pure place. I’m trying to say something true about human experience.”

Yakub Mathew, the author, is known for his financial leadership at institutions such as HSBC, Citi Private Banking, and Wells Fargo Advisors. His literary venture reflects his adaptability and commitment to values-driven service. Mathew holds advanced degrees from St. Stephen’s College, Madras University, and the Asian Institute of Management.

The Maha Kumbh Mela, which concluded in February 2025, saw over 660 million devotees from various faiths converge at the Triveni Sangam for a holy dip. This festival, rooted in the ancient Rigveda and entwined with the mythic tale of Sagar Manthan, rotates among four locations in cycles of 4, 6, and 12 years. The rare Maha Kumbh, believed to occur once every 144 years, was commemorated in Prayagraj, marking a historic moment for millions.

Reflecting on his personal pilgrimage, Mathew shared, “In January 2025, I fulfilled a lifelong dream by embarking on a pilgrimage to Prayagraj for the once-in-144-years Maha Kumbh, where the sacred rivers Ganga, Yamuna, and Saraswati meet. Joined by my wife and seventeen dear friends from across the globe, the experience became a profound celebration of the completion of my 60th year and a spiritual journey that inspired deep reflection on life’s eternal questions.”

The book has received endorsements from revered spiritual leaders, including The Dalai Lama, Sadhguru, Maharaj Avadheshanand Giri Ji, Cardinal Oswald Gracias, and Maharaj Radhanath Swami Ji. Their support, along with the presence of global thought leaders at the launch, underscores the book’s interfaith ethos and its resonance across spiritual traditions.

Mathew’s vision for *Seeking the Infinite* is heartfelt: “What began as a way to capture our memories soon evolved into this book, enriched by insights from over fifty renowned personalities across diverse fields. The Maha Kumbh reminded us that beyond faith and culture lies a shared divine essence, and through this work, we hope to spark interfaith harmony and inspire seekers everywhere to look within and seek the Infinite.”

The overwhelming turnout of over 600 attendees on a Sunday evening in New York City highlighted the festival’s status as a global gathering for thought leaders, spiritual seekers, and lovers of culture. The book launch was celebrated not only as a literary achievement but also as a rare confluence of wisdom, culture, and inspiration—an evening not to be missed by seekers, scholars, and skeptics alike.

*Seeking the Infinite* stands as a contemplative invitation to all—whether seeker, scholar, or skeptic—to reflect on faith, humility, and the universal human quest for the sacred. Through its essays, dialogues, and interfaith encounters, the book offers a meditative lens on India’s spiritual heartbeat and the global soul it awakens.

In the words of Yakub Mathew, “The Infinite is not a place to reach. But a truth to remember—that within you lies a horizon without end.”

Source: Original article

Hyundai AutoEver America Data Breach: Understanding Potential Risks

Staff ReporterLaw/Legal, Politics, Security 0

Hyundai AutoEver America has reported a data breach affecting 2,000 employees, exposing sensitive personal information, including Social Security numbers and driver’s license details.

Hyundai AutoEver America (HAEA) has confirmed a data breach that has impacted approximately 2,000 current and former employees. The breach, which exposed sensitive information such as names, Social Security numbers, and driver’s license details, was discovered on March 1, 2025. Investigators traced the intrusion back to February 22, with the breach continuing until March 2.

HAEA, which provides IT services for Hyundai Motor America, supports employee operations and certain connected-vehicle technologies. While the breach involved employment-related data, the company clarified that no customer or driver data was compromised. According to a statement provided to CyberGuy, the breach was limited to information associated with Hyundai AutoEver America and Hyundai Motor America.

The company notified affected employees in late October and has since alerted law enforcement. Additionally, HAEA has engaged external cybersecurity experts to assess the situation and mitigate any potential damage.

The exposed data is particularly concerning because it includes Social Security numbers, which are difficult to change. Experts warn that such information can lead to long-term identity theft and financial fraud. Criminals can exploit these details to create fake identities, open fraudulent accounts, and conduct targeted phishing attacks long after the breach has occurred.

Hyundai AutoEver America manages select IT systems related to Hyundai Motor America’s employee operations, as well as broader technology functions for Hyundai and Genesis across North America. The company emphasized that the breach primarily affected employment-related data and did not involve customer information or the millions of connected vehicles it supports.

Earlier reports mistakenly suggested that 2.7 million individuals were affected by the breach. However, Hyundai clarified that this figure is unrelated to the security incident. Instead, it represents the estimated number of connected vehicles supported by Hyundai AutoEver America across North America. None of this consumer or vehicle data was accessed during the breach.

In a statement to CyberGuy, a representative from HAEA said, “Hyundai AutoEver America, an IT vendor that manages certain Hyundai Motor America employee data systems, experienced an incident to that area of business that impacted employment-related data and primarily affected current and former employees of Hyundai AutoEver America and Hyundai Motor America. Approximately 2,000 primarily current and former employees were notified of the incident. The 2.7 million figure that is cited in many media articles has no relation to the actual security incident. No Hyundai consumer data was exposed, and no Hyundai Motor America customer information or Bluelink driver data was compromised.”

This incident serves as a reminder of the importance of safeguarding personal information. Individuals, whether directly affected or not, should take proactive steps to protect their data and reduce the risk of identity theft or scams.

To enhance security, individuals are advised to contact major credit bureaus—Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax—to set up a fraud alert or freeze. This can help block new accounts from being opened in their name. Additionally, those using apps linked to their vehicles should update passwords and enable multi-factor authentication. Avoiding the storage of login details in unsecured locations is also recommended, and using a password manager can help generate and securely store complex passwords.

It is also wise to check if personal email addresses have been exposed in past breaches. Certain password managers include built-in breach scanners that can alert users if their information has appeared in known leaks. If a match is found, changing reused passwords and securing those accounts with new credentials is crucial.

Scammers may attempt to exploit the Hyundai AutoEver America breach by posing as customer support representatives from Hyundai, Kia, or Genesis. They may claim to assist in verifying accounts, updating information, or fixing security issues. Individuals are advised not to share personal details or click on links in unsolicited messages. Instead, they should navigate to the brand’s official website directly to confirm any requests.

Using strong antivirus software can help block phishing links, malware downloads, and fraudulent websites that may emerge following a data breach. Such software can also scan devices for hidden threats that could compromise personal information.

For those concerned about their personal data being available online, data removal tools can help find and delete personal information from people-search and data-broker sites. While no service can guarantee complete removal of data from the internet, these tools can significantly reduce the chances of being targeted by scammers.

Identity monitoring services can also be beneficial, as they track personal information and alert users to potential misuse. These services can monitor Social Security numbers, phone numbers, and email addresses, notifying users if their information is being sold on the dark web or used to open accounts fraudulently.

Regularly installing security updates on devices, including smartphones, laptops, and smart car systems, can help reduce the risk of future attacks. If unusual account activity, fraudulent charges, or suspicious messages related to this breach are detected, individuals should report them immediately. This includes contacting banks or credit card providers to freeze or dispute unauthorized transactions and filing a report with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) at IdentityTheft.gov.

This incident highlights the interconnectedness of personal data and modern vehicles, underscoring the importance of protecting sensitive information. Staying vigilant, utilizing available tools, and promptly reporting suspicious activity are essential steps in safeguarding personal data.

Source: Original article

Supreme Court to Review Ninth Circuit Ruling on Asylum Seeker Turnbacks

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Politics 0

The Supreme Court has agreed to review a Ninth Circuit ruling that deemed the Trump administration’s turnback policy for asylum seekers unlawful.

Washington (November 17, 2025) – The Supreme Court has granted the Trump administration’s request to review a Ninth Circuit decision that declared the government’s prior turnback policy, known as “metering,” unlawful. This policy allowed border officers to physically block individuals from seeking asylum at ports of entry along the southern border, effectively turning them back to Mexico.

In response to the Supreme Court’s decision, attorneys representing the asylum seekers, along with Al Otro Lado, an organization dedicated to supporting them, issued a statement emphasizing the legal rights of noncitizens. They argued that individuals seeking safety at U.S. ports of entry have a legal right to apply for asylum. The Ninth Circuit’s ruling, they noted, correctly concluded that U.S. immigration laws mandate the government to inspect and process asylum seekers at these ports, allowing them to pursue their legal claims within the United States.

The statement further criticized the government’s turnback policy as an illegal maneuver to bypass these legal requirements. It highlighted the dire consequences faced by vulnerable families, children, and adults fleeing persecution, who were left stranded in dangerous conditions where they encountered threats of violence, kidnapping, and even death. The attorneys expressed their eagerness to present their case before the Court.

Co-counsel for the case includes the American Immigration Council, the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies (CGRS), the Center for Constitutional Rights, Democracy Forward, and the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection.

Al Otro Lado provides comprehensive legal and humanitarian support to refugees, deportees, and other migrants in both the U.S. and Tijuana. Their approach is multidisciplinary and client-centered, focusing on harm reduction. They engage in individual representation, human rights monitoring, medical-legal partnerships, and impact litigation to safeguard the rights of immigrants and asylum seekers.

The American Immigration Council aims to strengthen America by influencing public perceptions and actions regarding immigrants and immigration. They advocate for a fair and just immigration system that welcomes those in need of protection while harnessing the skills and energy that immigrants contribute to society. Their strategies include litigation, research, legislative and administrative advocacy, and communications.

The Center for Gender & Refugee Studies is dedicated to defending the human rights of refugees seeking asylum in the United States. With a strategic focus and extensive legal expertise, CGRS champions complex cases, advocates for due process, and promotes policies that ensure safety and justice for refugees.

The Center for Constitutional Rights has been fighting for justice and liberation since 1966, working with communities facing threats from oppressive systems of power, including structural racism and governmental overreach. Their efforts include litigation, advocacy, and strategic communications.

The Democracy Forward Foundation is a national legal organization that promotes democracy and social progress through litigation, policy initiatives, public education, and regulatory engagement.

The Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection, a non-partisan public interest organization within Georgetown Law, focuses on defending constitutional rights and protecting democratic processes through litigation, policy work, and public education.

As the case progresses, it will be closely watched for its implications on the rights of asylum seekers and the broader immigration landscape in the United States.

Source: Original article

A Guardian and a Thief: The Story of an Indian-American Encounter

Staff ReporterCulture, India, Politics 0

In her new novel, ‘A Guardian And A Thief,’ Megha Majumdar explores the complexities of human relationships against the backdrop of a climate crisis in a near-future Kolkata.

Megha Majumdar’s latest novel, ‘A Guardian And A Thief,’ transports readers to a near-future Kolkata, where the characters grapple with both external climate crises and internal moral dilemmas. The narrative intricately weaves the lives of individuals who oscillate between being guardians and thieves, reflecting the profound struggles of humanity in challenging times.

Majumdar’s work has garnered significant recognition, earning her a spot as a finalist for both the National Book Award for fiction and the Kirkus Prize. Her debut novel, ‘A Burning,’ released in 2020, was a Whiting Award winner and received a longlisting for the National Book Award, setting a high bar for her subsequent works.

Born and raised in Kolkata, Majumdar pursued her education in anthropology at Harvard and Johns Hopkins. Currently residing in New York, she teaches creative writing at Hunter College. The journey of writing ‘A Guardian And A Thief’ spanned six years, during which Majumdar became a mother, a life change that she credits with helping her discover the book’s emotional core.

In an interview with India Currents, Majumdar expressed her excitement and surprise at being recognized for her work. “It feels remarkable that a book set in Kolkata is up for this kind of honor in the US. That feels really moving to me,” she stated.

Reflecting on the pressure of following up her successful debut, Majumdar noted that the attention her first book received was more of a boost than a burden. “It never really felt like pressure or stress to me. If anything, it was the opposite; it was a kind of assurance that I would get to write another book and publish it,” she explained. She emphasized her desire to create a work that was stronger and more complex than her first, aiming for a narrative that would resonate deeply with readers.

Majumdar also discussed the evolution of her writing process. She acknowledged that while her first novel felt intuitive, the experience of writing ‘A Guardian And A Thief’ made her more conscious of her craft. “I felt very aware of how I could improve my craft. How does plot work? How does a narrative move?” she said, highlighting her focus on creating a thought-provoking and engaging story.

When asked about the political dimensions of her writing, Majumdar clarified that her latest novel is not less political but rather engages with different questions. “I think I was paying attention to a question that emerged while thinking about my hometown, Kolkata, and how profoundly it has already been affected by climate change,” she remarked. The novel addresses urgent issues such as class disparities and resource scarcity, asking who gets to escape crises and who does not.

Majumdar believes that fiction serves a broader purpose beyond mere entertainment. “Fiction gives us a place to think about the big questions. What do I care about? What has meaning for me?” she said. She appreciates the diverse forms fiction can take, from contemporary narratives to escapist tales, each offering unique insights and emotional experiences.

A significant theme in ‘A Guardian And A Thief’ is the longing of its characters to leave their imperfect lives in India for a better future in America. Majumdar drew on her own immigration experience, having moved from Kolkata at the age of 19. “There is such a wound that you always carry because you left behind your family, your childhood friends,” she reflected, acknowledging the duality of joy and sorrow that accompanies such a transition.

In discussing her literary influences, Majumdar shared her passion for reading widely across genres. She mentioned recent favorites, including ‘The Way You Want to Be Loved’ by Aruni Kashyap and ‘Loot’ by Tania James. To stay creatively nourished, she engages with various forms of art, from literature to theater, finding inspiration in diverse artistic expressions.

As Majumdar continues to explore the complexities of human experience through her writing, ‘A Guardian And A Thief’ stands as a testament to her growth as an author and her commitment to addressing pressing global issues through the lens of fiction.

Source: Original article

Dr. Aditi Bussells: Indian-American Trailblazer Making Impact in the South

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Dr. Aditi Bussells, the first South Asian woman elected to municipal office in South Carolina, is transforming representation and inclusion while facing xenophobic challenges in her runoff election.

During my internship at the Columbia City Council, I had the privilege of meeting Dr. Aditi Bussells, a leader who exudes confidence without apology. As an Indian woman raised in South Carolina, I often found it challenging to see individuals who looked like me in positions of public leadership, particularly in the South. Observing Dr. Bussells inspired me to embrace my identity and celebrate it rather than hide it.

Dr. Bussells has made history as the first South Asian woman ever elected to municipal office in South Carolina. In her first term, she has accomplished much more than simply breaking barriers; she has built bridges within her community. From co-hosting Diwali celebrations at the Governor’s Mansion to amplifying the voices of Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities statewide, she has turned representation into meaningful inclusion.

As she approaches her runoff election, Dr. Bussells is confronting xenophobic attacks aimed at undermining her sense of belonging. Her opponent’s campaign has circulated messages suggesting she is “not one of us.” This rhetoric not only targets her but also impacts every immigrant, first-generation American, and young person who has ever felt alienated in their own community.

The stakes in this election extend beyond the immediate outcome; they encompass the broader future of belonging in the South. As South Asian Americans, it is imperative that we do not turn a blind eye to these challenges. Historically, the South has been overlooked in discussions about our political influence, but this narrative is shifting thanks to leaders like Dr. Bussells. She serves as a powerful reminder that representation is crucial not only in Washington or on the coasts but in every city, town, and statehouse across the nation.

Civic service should reflect the diversity of the communities it serves. Dr. Bussells exemplifies that young South Asians can—and should—occupy space in public life, paving the way for future generations to follow in her footsteps.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Files Lawsuit Against California Law Restricting ICE Face Masks

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, USA 0

The Trump administration has filed a lawsuit against California over a law that prohibits federal immigration agents from wearing masks to conceal their identities, claiming it violates constitutional authority.

The Trump administration has initiated legal action against California, contesting a new law that bans federal immigration agents from wearing masks to hide their identities. The lawsuit, filed on Monday, asserts that the state lacks the authority to impose such restrictions on federal agents, deeming the measure unconstitutional.

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the No Secret Police Act and the No Vigilantes Act into law in September. These laws prohibit most law enforcement officers, including federal agents, from wearing masks while on duty. Additionally, non-uniformed officers are required to display their identification visibly during their operations. However, exceptions are made for undercover agents, those wearing medical masks like N95 respirators, and individuals using masks as part of tactical gear.

In a statement regarding the legislation, Newsom emphasized that federal immigration officers would no longer be “hidden from accountability” during their operations in California. “That’s not the America we’ve grown up in. And so we are pushing back,” he stated ahead of the bill signings.

Federal immigration agents have conducted raids in Southern California since June, targeting migrant workers at local businesses. These operations have sparked protests and led to the federal deployment of the National Guard and Marines. During these raids, some federal agents wore masks to conceal their identities.

The Trump administration is urging the court to rule that the California laws violate the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which establishes that federal law is the “supreme Law of the Land,” taking precedence over state law. The lawsuit also contends that the California laws infringe upon Article 5, Section 301 of the U.S. Code, which grants agency heads the authority to prescribe regulations governing their departments and the conduct of their employees.

Attorney General Pam Bondi expressed concerns on Monday, stating that the California laws “discriminate against the federal government and are designed to create risk for our agents.” Following Newsom’s signing of the measures, administration officials instructed ICE agents to disregard the California laws. The Department of Homeland Security announced on September 22 that it would “NOT comply with Gavin Newsom’s unconstitutional mask ban,” citing an increase in threats against ICE officers.

The lawsuit further argues that the California laws “would recklessly endanger the lives of federal agents and their family members and compromise the operational effectiveness of federal law enforcement activities.” However, supporters of the mask ban for immigration agents contend that the use of face coverings instills fear in the public and must be addressed.

In response to the lawsuit, Newsom’s office stated that California officials “will see the [Department of Justice] in court.” Spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo criticized the Trump administration, suggesting that if it prioritized public safety as much as it does other issues, communities would be safer. She referred to President Donald Trump’s pardoning of individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riots as an example of misplaced priorities.

As the legal battle unfolds, the implications of this case could have significant effects on the operations of federal immigration agents in California and the broader relationship between state and federal authorities.

Source: Original article

SNAP Benefits Freeze Affects Immigrant Families Amid Ongoing Food Insecurity

Staff ReporterConflict, Immigration, Politics 0

As the government nears a potential reopening, millions of Americans face a continued freeze on SNAP payments while the Trump Administration intensifies funding for immigration enforcement efforts.

As millions of Americans grapple with the ongoing freeze on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payments, the Trump Administration is simultaneously ramping up funding for its immigration enforcement initiatives. This development comes as the government appears poised to reopen after a prolonged shutdown.

Recent documentation reveals that the administration has allocated millions in new federal contracts to Palantir Technologies, a software company that plays a crucial role in the government’s efforts to target, detain, and deport immigrants. On September 19, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) exercised a $19 million option to expand its existing contract with Palantir, aimed at enhancing its Investigative Case Management System. Just a week later, ICE announced a supplemental agreement totaling $30 million to improve the prototype of its ImmigrationOS system, designed to better track and detain immigrants. The following day, ICE awarded Palantir an additional $2 million to further support its ongoing contract.

Despite the government shutdown, ICE is ensuring that its deportation operations continue unabated. While some of the software enhancements will assist ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Unit in combating drug and human trafficking, it is evident that the enhanced capabilities of ImmigrationOS and the Investigative Case Management System will also be used to target immigrants who are not involved in criminal activities, including those who voice dissent against government policies.

Austin Kocher, a geographer at Syracuse University and a leading expert in immigration enforcement trends, reported a significant increase in ICE arrests, rising from 12,000 per month in January 2025, at the end of the Biden administration, to 30,000 per month by September. Alarmingly, nearly half of those detained were non-criminals.

The non-criminal detainees include many individuals who are lawfully present in the U.S., such as backlogged applicants for U visas—designated for victims or witnesses of crimes who have assisted law enforcement—T visa applicants (victims of human trafficking), backlogged asylum seekers, and DACA recipients. There is currently no comprehensive record of how Palantir’s technology has been employed to target specific individuals, but reports indicate that ICE has utilized the software to monitor individual air travel, scan driver’s licenses, and access cell phone records, among other data points.

Among the vulnerable immigrant populations are those living and working legally in the U.S. under Temporary Protected Status (TPS). These individuals face precarious circumstances, as their legal status can be revoked at any time due to arbitrary decisions made by the government. For instance, in July, nearly 9,000 Afghans had their TPS status revoked after the Department of Homeland Security determined that conditions in Afghanistan had improved, despite reports indicating that over half of the country’s population requires food aid and that rights for women and minorities are deteriorating.

Many of these Afghan TPS recipients fled their home country in 2021 amid the U.S. withdrawal, having worked with U.S. and international agencies to promote democracy or served as translators during military operations against the Taliban.

By leveraging data from various sources and utilizing Palantir’s artificial intelligence technology, ICE can more effectively target and track these vulnerable groups, including Afghans, Haitians, Venezuelans, South Sudanese, and others who have been criminalized by sudden revocations of their legal status.

It remains uncertain what specific enhancements Palantir will implement with the new influx of federal funding, and what additional personal information—including Medicaid, SNAP, IRS, and Social Security Administration data—will become accessible to the Department of Homeland Security. However, it is likely that these developments will lead to an expansion of state and commercial databases that can be used to target and monitor individuals, regardless of their immigration status.

One concerning example is the Department of Labor’s recent attempt to access individual records from the federal-state unemployment insurance system. “This should be ringing alarm bells,” said Quinn Anex-Ries, a senior policy analyst at the Center for Democracy and Technology. He noted that this effort occurs against the backdrop of the Trump administration’s extensive initiatives to collect vast amounts of information about everyday Americans, often under the pretense of preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. However, as evidenced by past actions, this data has frequently been repurposed for surveillance and immigration enforcement.

The ultimate consequences of these initiatives to access confidential personal data, authorized by executive orders aimed at eliminating waste and protecting the American populace, remain uncertain. Many of these efforts have faced legal challenges, often being rebuffed by federal judges. Nevertheless, litigation continues, and the Supreme Court has generally supported assertions of executive authority.

As the Senate reaches a tentative agreement to reopen the government following the longest shutdown in U.S. history, the focus now shifts to the House of Representatives. Meanwhile, the Trump Administration persists in its campaign to freeze some or all SNAP payments while simultaneously increasing its investments in targeting immigrants.

Source: Original article

Trump Urges House Republicans to Release Epstein Files for Transparency

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

President Trump is urging House Republicans to vote for the release of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, calling the controversy a “Democrat hoax” and asserting he has “nothing to hide.”

President Donald Trump is calling on House Republicans to support the release of files associated with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. He insists he has “nothing to hide” and accuses Democrats of leveraging the Epstein case to distract from Republican achievements.

In a post on Truth Social on Sunday, Trump encouraged GOP lawmakers to vote in favor of making the documents public, labeling the ongoing controversy a “Democrat hoax perpetrated by radical left lunatics.” He emphasized the need to move past the issue, claiming it serves as a diversion from the successes of the Republican Party.

“As I said on Friday night aboard Air Force One to the Fake News Media, House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files, because we have nothing to hide,” Trump wrote. “It’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party, including our recent Victory on the Democrat ‘Shutdown.'”

Trump referenced the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) earlier release of thousands of pages of Epstein-related documents. He also pointed out that the DOJ is investigating potential connections between Epstein and various “Democrat operatives,” including former President Bill Clinton, LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers.

“The House Oversight Committee can have whatever they are legally entitled to, I DON’T CARE!” Trump stated. He further expressed his desire for Republicans to focus on key issues such as the economy, affordability, and recent successes in reducing inflation. “All I do care about is that Republicans get BACK ON POINT,” he added.

Trump highlighted several Republican achievements, including historic tax cuts, significant investments in America, military rebuilding, border security, and efforts to address issues related to transgender participation in sports.

He also suggested that if Democrats had any incriminating evidence against him, it would have emerged before the last presidential election. “Nobody cared about Jeffrey Epstein when he was alive, and if the Democrats had anything, they would have released it before our Landslide Election Victory,” Trump remarked.

Trump cautioned that some members of the Republican Party are being “used” and urged them to focus on the party’s accomplishments rather than falling into what he termed the Epstein “TRAP.” He concluded with a rallying cry, “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

In related news, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced on Friday that the DOJ would investigate prominent Democrats following the revelation of new emails indicating ties to Epstein. In a post on X, Bondi stated that Jay Clayton, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, would lead the investigation. “Clayton is one of the most capable and trusted prosecutors in the country,” Bondi wrote, assuring that the Department would pursue the matter with urgency and integrity to provide answers to the American public.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House, Bill Clinton, Reid Hoffman, and Larry Summers for comments regarding these developments.

Source: Original article

Racist Slur ‘Pajeet’ Gains Traction Online Among Indian-Americans

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics, USA 0

“Pajeet,” a derogatory term targeting Indians, has gained popularity among far-right groups, reflecting rising hostility toward Indian immigrants and H-1B visa workers in the U.S.

The term “Pajeet” has emerged as a slur within far-right online communities, gaining traction amid the backlash against H-1B visa holders and increasing political animosity toward Indian immigrants in the United States. This trend has been particularly notable since September, following President Trump’s announcement of a significant $100,000 fee for new H-1B visa applicants.

Shortly after the fee announcement, a disturbing campaign surfaced on 4Chan, an anonymous imageboard known for its minimal moderation. Some users encouraged Americans to prevent Indian H-1B workers traveling abroad from returning to the U.S. before the fee deadline by launching a “Clog the Toilet” initiative, which involved flooding airlines with fake bookings. Throughout these discussions, far-right commenters frequently referred to Indians using the term “Pajeet,” a word that many were encountering for the first time.

Although the term originated in the United States, it has since spread to right-wing groups in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Harmeet Gugni, a resident of Toronto, found the term particularly unsettling during a visit with family earlier this year. She recalls her relatives advising her to remain calm if anyone used the slur in public. “I was disturbed,” she said. “A casual walk in Brampton suddenly felt like something I had to prepare for. Thankfully, nothing happened, but it stayed with me.”

The term “Pajeet” evokes painful memories for many South Asians, reminiscent of the slur “Paki,” which has been used in the UK against Indians, Pakistanis, and Bangladeshis. As political rhetoric targeting immigrants, especially Indian H-1B workers, intensifies, the use of “Pajeet” has surged across various online platforms, including Reddit, X (formerly Twitter), and Instagram.

Sangay Mishra, a professor at Drew University specializing in immigrant political incorporation and racial politics, notes that the slur has circulated in far-right circles in the U.S. for several years. “I’ve been hearing about it for a while,” he remarked. “It doesn’t make logical sense, but racial slurs rarely do. People have tried to trace its origins, but there’s no single definitive answer.”

According to Know Your Meme, a digital encyclopedia documenting internet culture, the term “Pajeet” first appeared on 4Chan’s international board around 2015. It describes the term as a fabricated Indian name used to mock Indian men, particularly those who are Hindu or Sikh. A female variant, “Pajeeta,” emerged later, with both terms spreading beyond 4Chan in the early 2020s. Variations such as “Pajeet Kumar” are also commonly used.

Some theories regarding the term’s origin delve into internet folklore. One suggestion links it to the Turkish meme “Mehmet My Son,” proposing that “Pajeet” evolved as a parody name meant to mock Indians through exaggerated stereotypes, including outdated images of open defecation. Another explanation highlights the suffix “–jeet,” which is common in Sikh names, while “Kumar” is widely used among Hindus, making the slur an indiscriminate catch-all for Indians, regardless of their community. As one internet theorist pointed out, “White racists coined the term without understanding cultural differences; they lumped Sikh and Hindu names together and used it against all Indians.”

The association with open defecation has further fueled the creation of memes. A notorious 4Chan thread from July 2015 mocked an Indian user defending the country against “India smells bad” jokes, claiming that people only defecate on “designated shitting streets.” This phrase became a viral shorthand that led to numerous compilations and racist parodies.

A quick search on Instagram today reveals a plethora of far-right accounts employing “Pajeet” alongside images of cow dung, toilets, and degrading caricatures of Indians. Variations such as “Smelly Pajeets” are also prevalent, appearing in AI-generated videos and memes. The overarching theme is dehumanizing, reducing Indians, particularly immigrants, to a single, monolithic stereotype.

What makes the term “Pajeet” particularly insidious is its broad application. Many Americans unfamiliar with South Asian cultures tend to conflate different religions, languages, and regions under this single slur. As political hostility toward immigrants escalates, especially against Indian tech workers, the term has migrated from fringe forums into more mainstream corners of the internet.

As the discourse surrounding immigration and cultural identity continues to evolve, the spread of terms like “Pajeet” serves as a stark reminder of the challenges faced by immigrant communities in the U.S. and beyond.

Source: Original article

Big Tech Companies Support Tighter China Export Curbs on Nvidia

Staff ReporterPolitics, Technology 0

Amazon and Microsoft are backing legislation that would impose stricter export controls on Nvidia, impacting the chipmaker’s ability to sell advanced chips to China.

Amazon and Microsoft are reportedly aligning against Nvidia’s business interests in China. According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the two tech giants are supporting legislation aimed at further restricting Nvidia’s ability to export advanced chips to the country.

The legislation in question, known as the GAIN AI Act, was introduced in 2025 and seeks to ensure that U.S. companies have priority access to advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips while limiting exports to what are termed “countries of concern.” This proposed law aims to amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018, requiring AI chip manufacturers to prioritize domestic customers before selling or shipping high-performance processors internationally.

Under the GAIN AI Act, export licenses would be contingent upon meeting domestic demand first. Furthermore, only certain “trusted United States persons” would be permitted to operate or transport these chips abroad, and they would be subject to strict security protocols.

Nvidia, which holds a dominant position in the global chip market, has previously expressed concerns that the GAIN AI Act could stifle global competition for advanced chips, ultimately limiting the computing power available to other nations.

Supporters of the GAIN AI Act argue that it will protect American innovation and bolster the capabilities of startups, universities, and cloud service providers. They believe that maintaining U.S. leadership in critical AI technologies is essential for national security and economic growth. However, critics, including major chip manufacturers like Nvidia, warn that such restrictions could diminish global competitiveness, hinder exports, and slow the pace of technological advancement.

The GAIN AI Act represents a strategic effort to balance national security interests with economic considerations and technological leadership. Its impact will largely depend on the extent to which the proposed rules are enforced.

Reports indicate that Microsoft has publicly endorsed the legislation, while officials from Amazon’s cloud division have privately communicated their support to Senate staffers. This backing from major industry players, alongside support from AI startups such as Anthropic, highlights a growing recognition of the importance of ensuring that American firms, researchers, and institutions have reliable access to cutting-edge computing resources.

As the debate unfolds, it underscores the complexities of balancing innovation, competitiveness, and security in the tech industry. Nvidia and other critics caution that the proposed restrictions could limit the availability of high-performance chips on a global scale, potentially hindering international AI development and reducing the competitiveness of U.S. companies in foreign markets.

The GAIN AI Act thus occupies a critical space at the intersection of economic policy and national defense, illustrating how legislative measures can shape both domestic industrial strategies and global technology flows.

Source: Original article

Immigration Agencies Expand Workforce Amid Government Downsizing

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics, USA 0

The Trump administration has hired approximately 50,000 federal employees, primarily in immigration and national security, while planning to cut 300,000 positions across other government sectors.

The Trump administration has made significant changes to the federal workforce, adding roughly 50,000 employees since Inauguration Day. This hiring surge, primarily focused on national security roles, reflects the administration’s current priorities, particularly in immigration enforcement.

According to the government’s top personnel official, most of the new hires have been directed towards Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This rapid expansion of ICE has emerged as a clear indicator of the administration’s enforcement-driven approach to immigration policy.

This hiring initiative occurs alongside a broader strategy to reshape the federal workforce, even as the administration implements cuts in other departments. “It’s about reshaping the workforce to focus on the priorities that we think are most important,” the official stated.

Despite a hiring freeze and job cuts affecting various sectors of the federal bureaucracy, including the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Health and Human Services, the administration continues to bolster positions in immigration enforcement.

In August, the administration indicated plans to trim approximately 300,000 federal positions by the end of the year. This downsizing initiative has been spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk, who was appointed by President Trump to lead efforts aimed at reforming the 2.4-million-person civilian workforce.

Musk has argued that federal agencies have become bloated and inefficient, necessitating a dramatic overhaul to enhance functionality. This restructuring has led to cuts across agencies responsible for civil rights enforcement, tax collection, and federal clean-energy initiatives, as resources are redirected towards the administration’s priorities.

As these cuts have intensified, around 154,000 federal workers have opted for buyouts offered by the administration. Departures have occurred across various agencies, impacting areas such as weather forecasting, food safety, public health programs, and space operations, according to former officials and union representatives.

The combination of targeted hiring in security agencies and substantial cuts in civilian departments has set the stage for a significant transformation of the federal workforce. While the administration argues that reallocating personnel towards border enforcement and defense will enhance national strength, the extensive reductions in public services have raised concerns among former officials and labor groups about potential disruptions.

With tens of thousands of employees taking buyouts and many more expected to leave by the year’s end, the government is undergoing an unusually rapid overhaul. Supporters of the changes view them as long-overdue reforms, while critics warn that they could undermine essential operations.

Ultimately, the ability of federal agencies to adapt to these swift changes, along with the realization of the promised efficiencies, will be crucial in determining how effectively the government can address the needs of the country in the coming years.

Source: Original article

Britain Unveils Major Changes to Asylum Policies for Refugees

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Politics 0

Britain has announced a significant overhaul of its asylum policy, inspired by Denmark’s stringent immigration measures, marking the most substantial changes to its refugee system in modern history.

Britain is set to implement a major overhaul of its asylum policy, introducing longer wait times for permanent residency and mandating the return of refugees to their home countries once deemed safe. This shift represents the largest transformation of asylum seeker policies in modern times, drawing inspiration from Denmark, which is known for its strict immigration regulations and has faced considerable scrutiny from human rights organizations.

The Labour government in Britain has intensified its immigration stance in response to the rising popularity of the populist Reform U.K. party, which advocates for a stringent approach to immigration. As a result, Labour has felt compelled to adopt a tougher position on asylum seekers.

Among the key changes announced by the Home Office are the revocation of the statutory duty to provide housing and financial support to certain asylum seekers. Additionally, refugees will now have to wait 20 years to apply for permanent residency, a significant increase from the current five-year period. The duration of initial refugee status will be reduced from five years to two and a half years, and the rules governing family reunifications will be tightened. Furthermore, refugees will be encouraged or required to return to their home countries once it is considered safe.

The Home Office indicated that these measures will apply to asylum seekers who are able to work but choose not to, as well as those who engage in illegal activities. Support funded by taxpayers will be prioritized for individuals who contribute positively to the economy and local communities.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood stated that the changes aim to make the United Kingdom less appealing to illegal migrants and facilitate the removal of individuals whose asylum claims are denied. “This country has a proud tradition of welcoming those fleeing danger, but our generosity is drawing illegal migrants across the Channel,” Mahmood remarked. “The pace and scale of migration is placing immense pressure on communities.”

In response to these proposed changes, more than 100 British charities have urged Mahmood to “end the scapegoating of migrants and performative policies that only cause harm.” They argue that these measures exacerbate racism and violence against vulnerable populations.

Britain’s Refugee Council emphasized on social media platform X that refugees do not compare asylum systems when fleeing danger. Many seek asylum in the U.K. due to family connections, some familiarity with the English language, or existing networks that can help them rebuild their lives safely.

As the U.K. government moves forward with these sweeping changes, the implications for asylum seekers and the broader community remain to be seen.

Source: Original article

Michelle Obama Suggests America Is Not Ready for Woman President

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, Women 0

Former First Lady Michelle Obama expressed her belief that America is not ready to elect a woman president, citing the recent election as evidence.

Former First Lady Michelle Obama has stated that Americans are “not ready” to elect a woman to the presidency. She pointed to the recent presidential election, where former Vice President Kamala Harris lost to President Donald Trump, as a clear indication of this sentiment.

Obama made her remarks during an event at the Brooklyn Academy of Music while promoting her new book, “The Look.” Speaking to a crowd of women, she reflected on the challenges women face in politics. “As we saw in this past election, sadly, we ain’t ready,” she said on Friday.

She further emphasized her point, saying, “That’s why I’m like, don’t even look at me about running, because you all are lying. You’re not ready for a woman. You are not.” This candid statement underscores her belief that societal attitudes towards female leadership remain a significant barrier.

Obama elaborated on her perspective, suggesting that many men in America are uncomfortable with the idea of being led by a woman. “You know, we’ve got a lot of growing up to do, and there’s still, sadly, a lot of men who do not feel like they can be led by a woman, and we saw it,” she noted.

In her recently released book, which came out on November 4, Obama discusses her experiences with fashion, beauty, and her time in the White House as the first Black woman to serve as First Lady. She highlights the scrutiny women in politics often face regarding their physical appearance rather than their leadership abilities.

Reflecting on her time in the White House, Obama wrote, “During our family’s time in the White House, the way I looked was constantly being dissected — what I wore, how my hair was styled.” She expressed a desire to reclaim her narrative and share her story on her own terms.

In a post on Facebook promoting her book ahead of its release, she stated, “I’m thankful to be at a stage in life where I feel comfortable expressing myself freely — wearing what I love and doing what feels true to me.” She emphasized that “The Look” is about more than just fashion; it encompasses themes of confidence, identity, and the power of authenticity.

Obama concluded her message with the hope that her book would inspire conversations about self-perception and societal definitions of beauty. “My hope is that this book sparks conversation and reflection about the ways we see ourselves — and the way our society defines beauty,” she added.

As discussions around gender and leadership continue to evolve, Obama’s insights resonate with many who advocate for greater representation of women in positions of power.

Source: Original article

Historic Milestone for Indian-American Marathi Theater in the Bay Area

Staff ReporterCulture, Election, Fashion 0

The Marathi-speaking community in Northern California celebrated a milestone with the premiere of the first-ever locally produced Marathi musical, “Avagha Rang Ekachi Zala,” on November 2.

The Maharashtra Mandal Bay Area (MMBA) made history on November 2, when it staged “Avagha Rang Ekachi Zala,” the first-ever Marathi musical in the Bay Area. This landmark production took place at the Smithwick Theater in Los Altos Hills, marking a significant cultural achievement for the Marathi-speaking community of Northern California.

“Avagha Rang Ekachi Zala” is a unique blend of classical Indian Natya Sangeet and contemporary influences, including Western and Bollywood elements. This fusion creates an engaging East-meets-West experience that resonates with diverse audiences.

The musical was written by Dr. Meena Nerurkar and directed by Sheetal Dolas. It delves into the timeless struggle between spiritual tradition and modern expression, framed through the lens of Maharashtra’s rich kirtan (devotional music) heritage. The narrative, filled with emotional depth, takes audiences on a journey exploring faith, art, and the evolution of generational values.

At its core, “Avagha Rang Ekachi Zala” presents a dialogue between an elder, who embodies traditional beliefs, and his son, who represents contemporary thought. This conflict is not expressed through arguments but rather through the universal language of music and emotion. “It’s the story of music as a bridge — not a barrier — between eras,” Dolas explained.

The musical direction by Pandit Raghunandan Panshikar, a prominent Hindustani vocalist, provided the production with a rich classical foundation. Each song was performed live by the actors, creating a multisensory experience where traditional abhangas, bhavgeet, Bollywood melodies, and Western harmonies seamlessly coexisted.

The production featured an impressive sound stage, which included a 1,500-square-foot set and over 250 synchronized light and sound cues. The entire setup required more than 2,000 volunteer hours to bring to life.

The cast comprised local talent, including Yogita Bhatkhande, Milind Bhandarkar, Amol Paranjape, Manoj Tamhankar, Gauri Apsingekar-Joshi, and Shalaka Dolas. They were supported by live musicians Ajinkya Ranade, Rahul Zingde, Mihika Maharana, and Ayush Tarhalkar. A creative team led by Sanjay Pachpande, Pranita Saklikar, Manasi Havaldar, Amit Karmarkar, Sameer Deolikar, and Deepak Tare worked diligently to recreate medieval Maharashtra with intricate sets and period costumes designed by Meera Tamhankar and Sharvari Dolas.

The performance attracted a sold-out audience of over 800 attendees, marking a significant achievement for the local Marathi theater scene. MMBA president Bhaskar Ranade expressed pride in the production, stating, “This is a defining moment for the Bay Area’s Marathi stage. For the first time, a fully homegrown team filled a major auditorium — proving that our local talent can create art of international quality.”

Looking ahead, Dolas envisions “Avagha Rang Ekachi Zala” touring other U.S. cities and eventually making its way to India. “This isn’t just a play,” he remarked. “It’s history in the making — a reminder that passion, teamwork, and cultural pride can turn dreams into standing ovations.”

The audience responded enthusiastically, giving the performance a standing ovation. One theatergoer remarked, “Everything — from acting and singing to costumes and stagecraft — was world-class. It felt like Broadway in Marathi.”

Source: Original article

Kristi Noem Reports Faster Green Card and Visa Processing Under Trump

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Visa 0

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced that the Trump administration is making progress in expediting green card and visa processing, despite a significant backlog of applications.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem recently stated that the Trump administration has made significant strides in accelerating the processing of green card and visa applications. Speaking in November, Noem emphasized that the number of individuals becoming U.S. citizens has reached unprecedented levels during this administration, reflecting both faster processing times and an increase in naturalizations.

However, these optimistic remarks come amid a challenging backdrop. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is currently grappling with an unprecedented backlog, with over 11 million pending applications. This surge in demand encompasses various immigration categories, including green cards, work permits, and popular admissions like the H-1B visa. As a result, processing times for many applications remain lengthy, leading to frustration among applicants awaiting decisions.

Noem underscored the administration’s commitment to enhancing the integrity of the visa and green card systems. She highlighted improvements in vetting procedures, aimed at ensuring that only qualified individuals seeking legitimate entry into the United States are approved. Furthermore, she noted a strong commitment to balancing enforcement with the facilitation of legal immigration.

Despite these efforts, experts point out that while premium processing fees can offer a slight reduction in wait times for some applicants, the average processing time for employment-based green cards still extends to several years. This reality raises concerns among stakeholders who argue that reforming and streamlining immigration procedures is essential for maintaining the United States’ competitiveness in attracting global talent.

The administration’s broader immigration agenda continues to focus on security, efficiency, and legal compliance as it navigates these challenges. As the landscape of immigration evolves, the emphasis remains on improving processes while ensuring that the integrity of the system is upheld.

Source: Original article

Pennsylvania Legislation Aims to Legalize Flying Cars for Future Use

Staff ReporterBusiness, Election, Technology 0

Pennsylvania’s Jetsons Act aims to establish regulations for flying cars, positioning the state as a leader in advanced air mobility technology.

Pennsylvania is taking steps to potentially welcome flying cars with the reintroduction of Senate Bill 1077, known as the Jetsons Act. State Senator Marty Flynn from the 22nd District has proposed this legislation during the 2025-2026 Regular Session.

The Jetsons Act seeks to amend Title 75 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to create a new legal category for hybrid ground-air vehicles. These innovative vehicles would be capable of operating both on public roads as motor vehicles and in the air as aircraft.

The bill was referred to the Senate Transportation Committee on November 5, 2025. Although a similar version of the bill did not pass in the previous session, Flynn remains dedicated to making Pennsylvania a leader in advanced transportation technology. He believes that establishing a regulatory framework now will enable the state to adapt swiftly when flying cars become commercially viable.

As technology progresses, the gap between existing laws and emerging innovations continues to widen. The rise of advanced air mobility is redefining the boundaries between cars and aircraft. Several companies, including Alef Aeronautics, Samson Sky, and CycloTech, are actively developing vehicles that can take off vertically or transition from cars to small aircraft in a matter of minutes.

Other states are already paving the way for this new era. Minnesota and New Hampshire have passed legislation that formally recognizes “roadable aircraft,” marking them as the first states to classify flying cars as both vehicles and aircraft under state law. Pennsylvania aims to follow suit with its own version through Senator Flynn’s Jetsons Act.

In addition, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has started approving real-world tests for flying cars. In 2023, the FAA granted a special airworthiness certificate to Alef Aeronautics for its Model A prototype, allowing it to operate on both roads and in the air for research and development purposes. This marked a significant milestone, as it was the first time a flying car received official clearance for combined ground and flight testing in the United States.

Senator Flynn is eager for Pennsylvania to be part of the national dialogue surrounding this emerging technology. In his co-sponsorship memo, he emphasized that proactive legislation will better prepare the state for the next wave of innovation.

Under Senate Bill 1077, Pennsylvania would officially define a “roadable aircraft” as a hybrid vehicle capable of both driving and flying. These vehicles would be required to register with the state, display a unique registration plate, and meet standard inspection requirements. When operated on highways or city streets, they would be subject to the same rules as other vehicles. In flight, they would remain under federal aviation oversight.

The bill also outlines how drivers and pilots must safely transition between ground and air operations. Take-offs and landings would only be permitted in approved areas, except during emergencies. Flynn believes that clear definitions and consistent oversight will help prevent confusion for both motorists and law enforcement. He hopes this clarity will also encourage manufacturers to view Pennsylvania as a viable test site for future flying car technologies.

For residents of Pennsylvania, this bill could fundamentally change perceptions of personal transportation. While flying cars are still in development, legislation like the Jetsons Act sets the groundwork for their eventual arrival. In the future, drivers may register, inspect, and insure flying cars just as they do with conventional vehicles. Pilots could utilize the same roadways to access take-off zones before transitioning to flight mode.

Even for those who may never own a flying car, the implications of this legislation could be significant. New regulations may influence local zoning laws, airspace management, and infrastructure planning. Communities might see the introduction of new vertiports or designated landing pads as part of urban development. Insurance companies and safety regulators will need to rethink their approaches to accommodate this new class of hybrid travel.

The Jetsons Act also signals a broader shift in how states are approaching innovation. Rather than waiting for federal action, Pennsylvania aims to establish a framework that welcomes new technologies while ensuring public safety.

Senator Flynn’s Jetsons Act may sound futuristic, but it reflects a growing reality in transportation. As autonomous vehicles, drones, and hybrid aircraft continue to evolve, state governments must adapt to keep pace. This legislation demonstrates Pennsylvania’s willingness to lead rather than follow. While it may take years before flying cars become commonplace, the groundwork is already being laid. Lawmakers are proactively considering licensing, safety, and the integration of flying cars into existing traffic systems. This forward-thinking approach could position Pennsylvania as one of the first states to see cars take to the skies.

Source: Original article

A Call for Moral Leadership After Red Fort Attack by Kashmir Solidarity USA

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, USA 0

Kashmir Solidarity USA expresses concern over the silence of Muslim leaders in India following the recent terrorist attack at the Red Fort, calling for clear moral leadership against extremism.

Kashmir Solidarity USA has voiced deep concern regarding the noticeable silence from prominent civilian Muslim leaders across India in the aftermath of the brutal terrorist attack at the historic Red Fort. While condemnation of this cowardly assault has echoed from nearly every corner of the country, influential voices within the Muslim community have largely refrained from issuing strong, unequivocal denunciations. This silence is not only conspicuous but also alarming.

Sam Zutshi, Founder and Chairman of Kashmir Solidarity USA, stated, “When terrorism strikes at the heart of India, every responsible leader must stand up and speak out. Silence at such a moment is not neutrality—it becomes a message in itself.” In a democratic society, moral clarity is essential. Terrorism transcends religion, community, and justification. However, when respected civilian leaders choose not to condemn a violent attack that has shaken the nation, it raises serious questions about accountability and leadership.

This silence prompts critical inquiries among the populace: What does this silence signify? Why is there hesitation to condemn terrorism openly and decisively? Does this unwillingness to speak reflect quiet approval or fear of backlash from extremist elements?

Kashmir Solidarity USA emphasizes that communal harmony relies on courageous leadership that is unafraid to reject extremism “without ifs and buts.” The nation expects and deserves explicit condemnation of terrorism from all segments of society. Zutshi added, “At a time when India is fighting radicalization, silence from influential figures endangers the very fabric of our secular and democratic values.”

The organization calls upon all community leaders, regardless of their faith, to issue a public and unconditional condemnation of the Red Fort attack. It urges civil society organizations to unite against radicalization and encourages media outlets nationwide to highlight the urgent need for moral responsibility and transparent civic leadership.

This issue transcends community identity; it is fundamentally about national integrity. An attack on India is an attack on every Indian.

About Kashmir Solidarity USA: Kashmir Solidarity USA is a national advocacy organization dedicated to promoting peace, justice, and truth regarding Kashmir and the broader Indo-American community. Under the leadership of Founder and Chairman Sam Zutshi, the group has consistently spoken out against terrorism and extremist propaganda.

Source: Original article

BBC Issues Apology to Donald Trump for Panorama Editing Error

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

The BBC has issued an apology to Donald Trump for misleading edits in a Panorama episode, which suggested he incited violence during his January 6, 2021, speech, but rejected his demand for damages.

The BBC has formally apologized to former U.S. President Donald Trump regarding the editing of his speech from January 6, 2021, in a 2024 episode of Panorama. The edits unintentionally created the misleading impression that Trump directly incited violence during the Capitol riots. Despite this apology, the BBC has declined Trump’s request for $1 billion in damages, citing a lack of legal grounds for a defamation claim.

Following an internal review, the BBC acknowledged that the edited segment made it appear as though Trump’s remarks were a continuous excerpt, rather than a compilation of different parts of his speech. This misrepresentation led viewers to believe he was calling for violent action. In light of this, the broadcaster confirmed it would not rebroadcast the controversial program.

The situation escalated when it was discovered that a previous broadcast of Newsnight in 2022 had similarly edited the same speech in a misleading manner, prompting further criticism of the BBC’s editorial standards. This series of events ultimately resulted in the resignation of BBC Director General Tim Davie and Head of News Deborah Turness.

In response to demands from Trump’s legal team, the BBC’s lawyers outlined five key defenses in a letter. They argued that the program was broadcast only in the U.K. and did not reach U.S. audiences, that the clip did not harm Trump’s reputation as he was re-elected shortly after the events, and that the editing was intended to condense a lengthy speech without malice. Additionally, they noted that the contested clip represented only a small portion of an hour-long program that included multiple viewpoints, some of which were favorable to Trump. The lawyers also pointed out that political commentary is afforded strong protection under U.S. defamation laws.

BBC Chair Samir Shah personally apologized to the White House, expressing regret over the editing error while maintaining that no defamation had occurred. A spokesperson for the BBC emphasized the organization’s commitment to high editorial standards and indicated that the matter remains under review.

In an interview with Fox News, Trump characterized the edit as a “butchering” of his remarks and accused the BBC of misleading the public. His legal team has set a deadline for the BBC to retract the documentary, issue a full apology, and provide compensation. However, as of now, no formal lawsuit has been filed.

This incident has also sparked discussions about BBC board appointments and the corporation’s editorial independence. Critics have raised concerns regarding potential political influences on the BBC. Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats, has called for government intervention to safeguard the BBC’s impartiality amid the legal threats it faces.

The BBC’s misstep regarding the January 6 speech highlights the delicate balance that media organizations must maintain between editorial judgment and accuracy, particularly when covering politically charged events. While the BBC has apologized for the error and has ceased airing the program, the ongoing dispute underscores persistent challenges related to public trust and media accountability.

Source: Original article

Southern California Community Welcomes First Indian Consul General in Los Angeles

Staff ReporterNation, Politics, USA 0

The Cerritos community warmly welcomed Dr. K J Srinivasa, the first Consul General of India in Los Angeles, during a celebratory event on October 19, just before Diwali.

CERRITOS, CA – The Cerritos Center for the Performing Arts was filled to capacity on October 19 as the local community gathered to welcome Dr. K J Srinivasa, the inaugural Consul General of the newly established Consulate of India in Los Angeles. He was accompanied by Consul Kulwant Singh and Vice Consul Priyanka Tyagi for the momentous occasion.

The event was organized by the United Indian Associations of Southern California (UIASC) with support from various organizations across the greater Los Angeles area. Despite being held just a day before Diwali, the celebration attracted attendees from near and far.

The evening commenced with a traditional Ganesh Vandana, followed by vibrant performances of music and dance by local talent. Dr. Srinivasa inaugurated the event by lighting a ceremonial lamp and presiding over the national anthems of both the United States and India. Ashok (Pat) Patnaik welcomed guests and introduced the evening’s speakers.

Several community leaders took to the stage to share their thoughts. Anju Garg reflected on the Consulate’s journey from “vision to manifestation,” while Sudip Gorakshekar emphasized the importance of sustaining successful Indo-U.S. relations. Mallik Banda welcomed Dr. Srinivasa, marking a new chapter for the Indian diplomatic presence in Los Angeles. Ashok Madan spoke about the community’s long-standing desire for a consulate in the region, and Venkat Peddi and Kanak Singh Zala discussed the new opportunities the Consulate could bring.

Dr. Sukrit Mukerjee, UIASC Vice President and Convener, provided an overview of the organization’s history and its vision for future collaboration with the Indian Consulate. Business leader Dr. Kali Pradip Chaudhuri underscored the importance of patriotic unity, encouraging all Indians to unite in support of their homeland. UIASC President Kewal Kanda formally introduced Dr. Srinivasa, highlighting his previous role as Deputy Consul General in San Francisco.

In his address, Dr. Srinivasa commended the Indian diaspora for their significant role in making the Los Angeles Consulate a reality. He extended his wishes for a joyful Diwali and expressed his enthusiasm for reconnecting with community leaders he had previously engaged with during Pravasi Bharatiya Divas. Among his key initiatives, he discussed plans for a non-stop flight connecting Los Angeles with major Indian cities, the future of cricket in the Olympics, and opportunities to enhance bilateral business and collaboration. He also announced that the Consulate is expected to be fully operational in the downtown Los Angeles AON building by December.

The evening concluded with a meet-and-greet, allowing consulate officials to warmly interact with attendees and pose for photographs. Guests then enjoyed a festive dinner prepared by Artesia’s Ashoka the Great.

Source: Original article

Trump Withdraws Endorsement of Marjorie Taylor Greene, Criticizes Her Behavior

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Former President Donald Trump has withdrawn his endorsement of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, labeling her a “ranting lunatic” and suggesting support for a primary challenger ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Former President Donald Trump announced on Friday night via Truth Social that he is rescinding his support for Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, referring to her as a “ranting lunatic” and “Wacky Marjorie.” This marks a significant shift in their relationship, as Greene has been one of Trump’s staunchest allies since she entered Congress in 2021.

In his lengthy post, Trump accused the Georgia Republican of focusing on complaints rather than celebrating what he characterized as his administration’s “record achievements.” He claimed that Greene had expressed frustration over his lack of communication, stating, “She has told many people that she is upset that I don’t return her phone calls anymore.”

Trump’s comments come in the context of the upcoming 2026 midterm elections, where he vowed to provide “Complete and Unyielding Support” to any conservative primary challenger who may emerge against Greene. He suggested that Greene had shifted “Far Left,” citing her recent appearance on the daytime talk show, *The View*.

In his post, Trump reflected on a poll he had sent to Greene, indicating that her chances of winning a Senate or gubernatorial race were slim without his endorsement. “It seemed to all begin when I sent her a Poll stating that she should not run for Senator, or Governor, she was at 12%, and didn’t have a chance (unless, of course, she had my Endorsement — which she wasn’t about to get!),” he wrote.

Greene quickly responded to Trump’s remarks on social media, asserting that he had attacked her and lied about their interactions. “I haven’t called him at all, but I did send these text messages today,” she stated on X, sharing screenshots of her messages. She suggested that her recent communications regarding the Epstein files may have triggered Trump’s outburst, claiming, “It’s astonishing really how hard he’s fighting to stop the Epstein files from coming out that he actually goes to this level.”

In her response, Greene appeared to distance herself from Trump, emphasizing her commitment to her constituents and her faith. “I have supported President Trump with too much of my precious time, too much of my own money, and fought harder for him even when almost all other Republicans turned their back and denounced him,” she wrote. “But I don’t worship or serve Donald Trump. I worship God, Jesus is my savior, and I serve my district GA14 and the American people.”

Trump concluded his post by touting his administration’s accomplishments since the beginning of his second term in January, asserting that he had transformed the nation from a “DEAD Country” to the “HOTTEST” in the world within a year. He criticized Greene for her perceived negativity, stating, “all I see ‘Wacky’ Marjorie do is COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN!”

This development could pave the way for potential challengers within Georgia’s Republican Party to consider running against Greene in her solidly Republican district. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding this situation.

Source: Original article

US Transportation Department Proposes Limiting Flight Reductions to 6%

Staff ReporterNation, Politics, USA 0

The U.S. Transportation Department has implemented a freeze on flight reductions at 6% to stabilize air travel operations following disruptions caused by the recent government shutdown.

In the wake of the recent U.S. government shutdown, the Department of Transportation is taking steps to mitigate the impact on air travel. On Wednesday, the department announced a freeze on flight reductions at 6%, a measure that was put into effect earlier this week. This decision comes after significant cuts to flight schedules during the shutdown resulted in thousands of delays and cancellations.

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator Bryan Bedford issued a joint statement prior to President Donald Trump signing a funding bill to reopen the government. They indicated that the freeze would remain in place while the FAA assesses the situation to determine if the air travel system can gradually return to normal operations.

Airlines have expressed support for the decision, although they caution that some delays and disruptions may still occur as operations normalize. The freeze is intended as a temporary measure while the FAA continues to monitor staffing levels and overall system performance. By limiting flight reductions to 6%, the Transportation Department aims to balance the needs of passengers, airline logistics, and safety requirements, facilitating a smoother recovery for domestic air travel.

“If the FAA safety team determines the trend lines are moving in the right direction, we’ll put forward a path to resume normal operations,” Duffy stated.

The 6% reduction in flights at 40 of the nation’s busiest airports was initially implemented on Tuesday, following an emergency order issued by the Transportation Department last week. Staffing shortages among air traffic controllers had been a significant factor contributing to widespread delays and cancellations. However, improved attendance and stabilization of the system have enabled the FAA to maintain flight reductions at a manageable level.

The cuts were originally aimed at alleviating pressure on the aviation system, starting with a 4% reduction on November 7. The plan had called for increases to 8% on Thursday and 10% on Friday, but the freeze at 6% now reflects the need for a careful balance between operational efficiency and safety oversight.

By holding reductions at this level, the FAA can ensure that flights are adequately staffed with trained controllers, thereby minimizing the risk of accidents or procedural errors. Simultaneously, airlines can provide a more predictable schedule for passengers, which is crucial for restoring confidence in air travel following the disruptions caused by the shutdown.

Senate Republican leaders have announced plans to hold a hearing to examine the impact of the shutdown on aviation safety, travel, and the economy. “As we work to reopen the government, it’s critical that we address the damage done and look at the long-term effects of the shutdown,” said Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), chair of the aviation, space, and innovation subcommittee. He expressed eagerness to discuss with industry stakeholders how Congress can alleviate the strain on air traffic controllers and TSA agents while ensuring safety for passengers and sustainable operations for airlines and general aviation.

These discussions highlight the broader need for sustainable staffing policies and contingency planning in critical infrastructure sectors. The freeze on flight reductions, combined with ongoing oversight efforts, represents a coordinated approach to both immediate recovery and long-term resilience in the U.S. aviation system.

Source: Original article

Trump Proposes $2,000 Tariff Dividends for American Families

Staff ReporterBusiness, Politics 0

President Trump is committed to distributing $2,000 dividend checks to Americans funded by tariff revenue, although the proposal faces significant legislative and economic hurdles.

President Donald Trump has expressed a strong commitment to distributing $2,000 dividend checks to every American, a plan he intends to fund through tariff revenue. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed this initiative during a press briefing on Wednesday.

Leavitt stated, “The president made it clear he wants to make it happen. So his team of economic advisers are looking into it.” This announcement has sparked discussions about the potential implications and logistics of such a proposal.

During an appearance on ABC News’ “This Week,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent noted that the tariff dividend could take various forms. He emphasized that he had not yet discussed the specifics of the proposal with Trump. Bessent mentioned that the dividend could align with the tax reductions included in the president’s agenda, which aim to eliminate taxes on tips, overtime, and Social Security, as well as provide deductions for auto loans.

Trump initially shared his proposal via social media on Sunday morning, highlighting the benefits of tariffs. He stated, “People that are against Tariffs are FOOLS! We are now the Richest, Most Respected Country In the World, With Almost No Inflation, and A Record Stock Market Price. 401k’s are Highest EVER.” He further asserted that a dividend of at least $2,000 would be paid to every individual, excluding high-income earners.

If the dividend were to be made available to individuals earning $100,000 or less, it could potentially reach around 150 million Americans, resulting in an estimated total cost of $300 billion in dividends, according to Erica York, a policy expert at the Tax Foundation.

As of now, no legislation has been enacted to authorize this program, and specific eligibility criteria, such as income thresholds or dependent status, have yet to be defined. Experts have raised concerns regarding the sustainability of funding such payments solely through tariff revenue, as tariffs represent only a minor portion of federal income and are subject to fluctuations based on trade activities.

The proposal reflects a policy approach that seeks to utilize revenue generated from trade for direct benefits to citizens. However, significant uncertainties remain regarding its implementation. Factors such as budgetary constraints, legislative approval, and economic conditions could all influence the feasibility of the plan.

As it stands, the tariff dividend should be viewed as a proposed policy rather than a definitive program. It underscores the ongoing interest in direct financial measures as a means of economic stimulus, while also highlighting the challenges associated with ensuring such measures are fiscally sustainable, legally authorized, and administratively practical within the framework of U.S. governance.

Source: Original article

Spain Imposes $5.8 Million Fine on Elon Musk’s X for Unauthorized Crypto Ads

Staff ReporterBusiness, Economy, Politics 0

Spain has fined Elon Musk’s social media platform X approximately $5.8 million for failing to verify the authorization of a crypto advertiser.

Spain is taking a firm stance against tech billionaire Elon Musk. The country’s stock market supervisor has imposed a fine of approximately $5.8 million (€5 million) on Musk-owned social media platform X for neglecting to ensure that a cryptoasset company, which advertised on the platform, had the necessary authorization to provide investment services.

According to the Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV), the fine was levied against Twitter International Unlimited Company, the entity behind X, for not fulfilling its obligations to verify whether Quantum AI was authorized to offer investment services. The CNMV also noted that X failed to check if Quantum AI was listed among entities that had been warned about by the CNMV or foreign supervisory bodies.

This penalty, dated November 3, was officially published in Spain’s bulletin on Thursday. It stems from X’s failure to ensure that Quantum AI was properly authorized to provide investment services and was not included on any warning lists issued by Spanish or international regulators. In recent years, Spain has tightened its regulations to prevent misleading crypto promotions and to ensure that online platforms verify advertisers while clearly communicating investment risks to the public.

The fine underscores the increasing regulatory scrutiny faced by social media platforms as they serve as channels for financial advertising. While X has the right to appeal the decision in Spain’s high court, this case highlights the legal responsibilities that platforms now encounter under global digital, financial, and advertising regulations. It also signals to investors and tech companies that regulators are intensifying their enforcement of compliance measures to protect consumers in emerging, high-risk markets such as cryptocurrency.

X, formerly known as Twitter, is the social media platform owned by Musk. He rebranded it as X following his acquisition in 2022 and later integrated it with his AI firm, xAI, in an all-stock deal in March 2025. This transaction valued X at approximately $33 billion, excluding about $12 billion in debt.

In 2025, X has experienced a modest rebound in advertising revenue, with U.S. ad sales increasing around 17.5% year-on-year and global ad revenue rising approximately 16.5%. The platform continues to serve as a central hub for news, public commentary, and AI-driven features, reflecting Musk’s ambition to integrate advanced AI tools into social media.

Despite this growth, X faces ongoing regulatory challenges. European authorities are scrutinizing its operations, including the recent fine in Spain for violations related to crypto-asset advertising and an ongoing investigation in Ireland under the EU Digital Services Act. User metrics and financial disclosures remain somewhat opaque, suggesting that reported valuations and revenue figures should be interpreted with caution. These uncertainties highlight the challenges in assessing X’s long-term stability and profitability.

Musk’s dual role as the owner of both X and xAI draws additional attention, as regulators and the public closely monitor the intersection of AI tools and advertising practices with financial markets.

Source: Original article

Trump’s H-1B Visa Comments Divide Conservatives and MAGA Supporters

Staff ReporterConflict, Immigration, Politics 0

Donald Trump’s recent comments on the H-1B visa program have sparked intense debate among conservatives and MAGA supporters, highlighting divisions over immigration and labor policies.

President Donald Trump’s recent remarks regarding the H-1B visa program have reignited discussions across social media platforms. Many users are expressing the belief that the United States possesses sufficient talent to rely on its own workforce, rather than depending on foreign professionals. This debate raises questions about whether easing visa restrictions aligns with Trump’s long-standing “America First” philosophy.

One user on X stated, “America landed on the moon 20 years before the H-1B program even existed. Don’t give me this nonsense about America not having enough ‘talent.’ Abolish the H-1B program and invest in American youth, not foreigners.” This sentiment was echoed by another user who shared data emphasizing the contributions of foreign talent to American achievements, stating, “You mean the Moon landing was designed by a German, guided by Australians & Spaniards, & coded by Indians & immigrant engineers? America’s been powered by foreign talent long before H-1Bs existed.”

The user went on to list notable figures who contributed to the Apollo program, including Joe Mehta, an Indian engineer who worked on SIMCOM code, and Wernher von Braun, a German engineer who played a key role in developing the Saturn V rocket. This exchange quickly garnered thousands of reactions, revealing a significant divide over the United States’ reliance on global talent.

While some users argued for a focus on nurturing domestic skilled professionals, others pointed out that many of the country’s landmark achievements, from space exploration to the tech boom in Silicon Valley, have been built through international collaboration. The debate highlights how Trump’s comments have reignited broader questions about the balance between protecting domestic jobs and maintaining America’s status as a destination for global expertise.

In the midst of this debate, conservative commentator Ben Shapiro defended the H-1B visa program, arguing that it is essential for maintaining America’s technological edge. In a post on X, he pointed to gaps in U.S. education, particularly in STEM fields, and cited figures like Elon Musk, Sundar Pichai, and Satya Nadella as examples of how immigrant talent drives innovation and keeps high-tech jobs within the country.

Shapiro’s remarks, however, drew sharp backlash from the MAGA wing of the conservative movement, which accused him of prioritizing corporate interests over American workers. Supporters of the H-1B program contended that such initiatives are crucial for economic growth and global competitiveness. This division reflects a growing rift within conservative circles as Trump signals potential reforms to skilled immigration.

One user countered Shapiro’s defense, questioning the high-skilled nature of immigration by asking, “If the immigration is so high-skilled, why are their nations of origin (India and China) not desperate to retain it? Wouldn’t they surpass America as the global superpower if they were such a reservoir of entrepreneurship and expertise?”

Another user, Daniel Di Martino, shared data indicating that Indians in the U.S. have one of the lowest crime rates of any demographic group, far below that of non-Hispanic whites. This statistic was part of a broader discussion about the contributions of immigrants to American society.

Reflecting on the backlash against Shapiro, one user remarked, “All the H-1B Visa program does is circumvent the desperate need for educational reform in America.” Some users defended the program, arguing that Shapiro’s points about H-1B visas are valid, but suggested that many people simply do not understand the complexities involved.

The ongoing back-and-forth has laid bare a growing divide within conservative ranks regarding the future of America’s immigration and labor policies. On one side are those who view the H-1B program as detrimental to U.S. workers by suppressing wages and outsourcing opportunities. On the other side are conservatives who argue that restricting skilled immigration could stifle innovation, drive companies overseas, and weaken America’s leadership in technology.

This widening rift reflects a deeper ideological struggle between economic nationalism and global competitiveness, an issue that is likely to intensify as Trump’s stance on H-1B visas continues to evolve.

Source: Original article

Canadian Spy Chief Highlights Rise in Teen Terror Suspects Linked to Iran

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, Security 0

Canadian Security Intelligence Service reports a concerning rise in minors involved in terrorism investigations, highlighting the influence of online extremism and the need for early intervention.

The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) has revealed a troubling trend: nearly one in ten of its terrorism investigations involves individuals under the age of 18. This alarming statistic, driven largely by online extremism, was highlighted by CSIS Director Daniel Rogers during a rare public address on Thursday.

Since 2014, Canada has witnessed nearly two dozen violent extremist attacks, resulting in 29 fatalities and at least 60 injuries, according to Rogers. He emphasized that the involvement of minors in these investigations is particularly concerning, as it reflects a broader issue of radicalization among youth.

In August, a minor was arrested in Montreal for allegedly planning an attack on behalf of the terrorist group Daesh. This incident underscores the potential dangers posed by young individuals who may be influenced by extremist ideologies. Just months prior, a 15-year-old from the Edmonton area was charged with a terrorism-related offense after investigators from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) expressed fears that the teen was on the verge of committing serious violence linked to a transnational violent online network known as COM/764.

Rogers also noted that two 15-year-olds were arrested in Ottawa for allegedly conspiring to carry out a mass casualty attack targeting the Jewish community in Canada’s capital in late 2023 and early 2024. He remarked, “Clearly, radicalized youth can cause the same harms as radicalized adults, but the societal supports for youth may help us catch radicalization early and prevent it.”

He further stated that the tragic statistics would likely have been worse without the proactive measures taken by CSIS and its law enforcement partners. In December, CSIS collaborated with the RCMP and intelligence agencies from the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand to release a joint public report addressing the growing issue of youth involvement in violent extremism. This report aims to provide guidance to parents, guardians, and community members on how to identify early signs of radicalization and intervene before it escalates.

“Since 2022, CSIS has been involved in the disruption of no fewer than 24 violent extremist actions, each resulting in arrests or terrorism peace bond charges,” Rogers stated. He highlighted that in 2024, CSIS played a crucial role in thwarting two plots inspired by Daesh. In one instance, a father and son were reportedly in the advanced stages of planning an attack in the Toronto area. In another case, an individual was arrested before allegedly attempting to illegally enter the United States to target members of the Jewish community in New York.

Rogers emphasized the importance of collaboration, stating, “In these examples, and in many others I can’t discuss publicly, our counter-terrorism teams have partnered with law enforcement and saved lives.”

He attributed the rise in radicalization among youth to factors such as eroding social cohesion, increasing polarization, and significant global events that create a conducive environment for extremist ideologies to flourish. “Many who turn to violence radicalize exclusively online, often without direction from others,” Rogers explained. “They use technology to do so secretly and anonymously, seriously challenging the ability of our investigators to keep pace and to identify and prevent acts of violence.”

Additionally, Rogers noted that CSIS has been actively collecting intelligence and defending against transnational repression, which has recently included a shift in focus towards the actions of Iranian intelligence services and their proxies. “In particularly alarming cases over the last year, we’ve had to reprioritize our operations to counter the actions of Iranian intelligence services and their proxies who have targeted individuals they perceive as threats to their regime,” he said. “In more than one case, this involved detecting, investigating, and disrupting potentially lethal threats against individuals in Canada.”

As the landscape of extremism continues to evolve, the need for vigilance and proactive measures becomes increasingly critical. The rise of online radicalization among youth presents unique challenges that require a concerted effort from communities, families, and authorities to address effectively.

Source: Original article

Transgender Air Force Members File Lawsuit Over Lost Retirement Benefits

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

Seventeen transgender Air Force members have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after losing promised retirement benefits due to a ban on their military service.

Seventeen transgender Air Force members have initiated legal action against the federal government, claiming they were unjustly deprived of up to $2 million in retirement benefits following their discharge under the Trump administration’s transgender ban.

The plaintiffs, who served in the Air Force for periods ranging from 15 to 18 years, are seeking the retirement benefits that were previously guaranteed to them. The lawsuit was filed on Monday, following an announcement from the Air Force in August that transgender service members with 15 to 18 years of service would no longer be eligible for early retirement and associated benefits. This decision marked a significant reversal from earlier policies.

According to GLAD Law, one of the advocacy organizations involved in the lawsuit, the affected service members now face a substantial financial loss, which includes not only the potential loss of retirement benefits but also the elimination of health insurance coverage. The total financial impact could reach up to $2 million over the course of their lifetimes.

Michael Haley, a staff attorney with GLAD Law, described the revocation of early retirement benefits as indicative of “the general cruelty in attacking transgender people.” He noted that several plaintiffs had already received orders permitting their retirements, and some had begun the process of transitioning to civilian life.

Logan Ireland, a master sergeant in the Air Force with 15 years of service, including a deployment to Afghanistan, expressed his dismay at the situation. After his early retirement request was denied, he stated, “The military taught me to lead and fight, not retreat.” He emphasized that the removal of his retirement benefits sends a troubling message, suggesting that the values instilled in service members apply only in combat situations and not when they are in need of support.

This lawsuit is the latest in a series of legal challenges against policies implemented by the Trump administration that aim to exclude transgender individuals from military service. In May, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the enforcement of the transgender ban to proceed while legal challenges continue to unfold.

President Donald Trump and Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth have targeted transgender service members as part of broader efforts to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives within the military. In addition to revoking retirement benefits, the Air Force announced in August that transgender members would no longer have the opportunity to present their cases before a board of peers regarding their right to continue serving. The Pentagon has also indicated that a similar policy will be applied across the military.

The implications of these policies extend beyond financial losses, affecting the lives and careers of those who have dedicated years of service to their country. As the legal battles continue, the future of transgender individuals in the military remains uncertain.

Source: Original article

India Currents Recognized at American Community Media Expo for Excellence

Staff ReporterEducation, Politics, USA 0

California-based India Currents received recognition for its impactful journalism at the American Community Media Expo held on November 7 in Oakland.

American Community Media (ACoM) celebrated exceptional journalism from California’s ethnic media outlets during an awards ceremony on November 7 at the PG&E Conference Center in Oakland. The event brought together approximately 250 attendees, including ethnic media representatives, community leaders, communications specialists, and government officials.

The ACoM Expo featured a variety of panel discussions alongside the awards ceremony, highlighting the vital role that ethnic media play in amplifying community voices and addressing pressing issues. ACoM received numerous entries from various media platforms, including print, digital, broadcast, and social media, showcasing the diverse narratives within California’s ethnic communities.

“California’s ethnic media have shone as trusted messengers of news throughout a year of polarization and fear for many of their communities,” remarked ACoM staff, underscoring the importance of these outlets in providing reliable information during challenging times.

Among the notable achievements at the expo, Vignesh Ramachandran’s op-ed, “The Price of Indian American ‘Exceptionalism,’” earned second place in the Education category. A judge praised Ramachandran’s editorial for its insightful critique of how the portrayal of Indian American success stories often obscures the emotional, cultural, and psychological challenges faced by the community.

In his article, Ramachandran reflects on his father’s journey, who, after being accepted into IIT Madras at the young age of 15, later recognized the emotional toll of early success. This realization led him to raise his children in the United States with a focus on balance and play, emphasizing the importance of friendships and artistic pursuits over the pressures of elite education.

Ramachandran also draws on the thoughts of Pakistani American journalist Zaid Jilani, who discussed the perfectionist rhetoric surrounding Asian American students in STEM fields in a New York Times essay. Jilani’s perspective resonates with Ramachandran’s message: “Fear of precarity doesn’t have to rule our lives. The Indian American dream doesn’t just have to be about hard work; it can also be about enjoying the life that hard work has produced.”

This recognition at the ACoM Expo highlights the critical role that ethnic media play in fostering dialogue and understanding within diverse communities, as well as the importance of addressing the complexities of identity and success.

Source: Original article

South Asian Bar Association of Orange County Holds Board Installation Ceremony

Staff ReporterLaw/Legal, Politics, USA 0

The South Asian Bar Association of Orange County officially launched on November 4, marking a significant milestone for South Asian legal professionals in the region.

IRVINE, CA – A gathering of over a hundred attorneys, judges, law students, and community leaders took place at The Boardwalk on November 4 to celebrate the official launch of the South Asian Bar Association of Orange County (SABA-OC) and the installation of its inaugural Board of Directors.

This evening reception, hosted by Rutan & Tucker LLP, marked SABA-OC’s entry as the newest and 32nd chapter of the South Asian Bar Association of North America (SABA-NA). This national network represents thousands of South Asian legal professionals across the continent.

In its launch announcement, SABA-OC expressed its commitment to serving as a hub for connection, mentorship, advocacy, and professional growth for attorneys, law students, judges, and legal professionals of South Asian descent. “Whether you’re a seasoned practitioner, a new lawyer finding your path, or a student exploring the profession, we are here to celebrate your journey, create space for your voice, and amplify your impact,” the organization stated.

SABA-OC also acknowledged the South Asian Bar Association of Southern California (SABA-SC) for its decades of leadership and representation. “We are deeply indebted to SABA-SC for representing our community and, with their support, have the resources necessary to launch an independent South Asian legal bar organization serving Orange County exclusively,” organizers shared. They expressed enthusiasm for building stronger relationships with neighboring chapters in Los Angeles and San Diego as they establish their independent presence.

The program featured remarks from several respected legal leaders in the region. Hon. Shashi Kewalramani, a mediator and arbitrator with JAMS and a retired U.S. Magistrate Judge for the Central District of California, praised the chapter’s formation and emphasized the importance of ongoing engagement. “Forming SABA-OC is a tremendous first step. The next challenge is to stay relevant. I call upon big law firm partners, general counsel, and judicial officers to actively support this organization and ensure it thrives long after tonight,” he stated.

Mei Tsang, President of the Orange County Bar Association and an intellectual property lawyer at Umberg Zipser, reflected on her own immigrant journey and the significance of community. “Community is what shapes careers and gives life meaning,” Tsang said, extending a warm welcome to SABA-OC as part of the OCBA family.

Navneet S. Chugh, an attorney and CPA who is the founding president of SABA National, inspired attendees with his vision for global excellence. “Orange County is smart, wealthy, successful, educated, spacious yet intimate — paradise perfected,” Chugh remarked. “There’s no reason SABA-OC can’t become the number one Indian Bar Association in the world. Let’s dream big and then even bigger.”

Hon. Vibhav Mittal, the first South Asian judge on the Orange County Superior Court, presided over the installation of the inaugural Board of Directors. He shared a heartfelt story about family, connection, and the strength of community.

The newly installed Board of Directors includes Janani S. Rana as President, Fred Thiagarajah as Vice President, Simon Khinda as Secretary, Jehan Jayakumar as Treasurer, and Directors Amanat Singh, Yatika Chaudhri, Sabina Chopra, Ashley Daniel, Aditi Murillo, Cameron Patel, Rajal Patel, Swati Paul Khetani, Taline Ratanjee, Anand Sambhwani, Ricky Shah, Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal, and Akhil Sheth.

“This is a momentous day for the South Asian legal community in Orange County,” said Janani S. Rana, a partner at Minyard Morris and SABA-OC’s first President. “Our board represents a new generation of leadership committed to service, professionalism, and inclusion.”

Fred Thiagarajah, a prominent criminal defense attorney and longtime advocate for diversity in law, added, “SABA-OC will not only elevate South Asian lawyers in Orange County but also build bridges across all communities.” Thiagarajah will serve as the chapter’s first Vice President.

For more information or to become a member, visit www.sabaoc.org.

Source: Original article

Trump Signs Funding Bill to End 43-Day Government Shutdown

Staff ReporterNation, Politics 0

President Trump signed a significant funding bill on November 12, 2025, concluding a historic 43-day government shutdown that affected nearly three million federal workers and disrupted essential services nationwide.

On November 12, 2025, President Donald Trump signed a landmark government funding bill, officially ending the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, which lasted for 43 days. This political standoff left nearly 900,000 federal employees furloughed and forced an additional two million workers to operate without pay. The shutdown had widespread ramifications, affecting air travel, food assistance, and social services across the country. Food banks reported longer lines, while essential programs struggled to provide vital resources as many agencies reduced operations or were completely suspended.

The shutdown stemmed from Congress’s failure to pass appropriations legislation for the 2026 fiscal year, which began on October 1, 2025. A deep partisan divide emerged as members of the Senate and House struggled to reach consensus. Central to the impasse were disputes over extending enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies, which are crucial for lowering health care premiums for millions of Americans. Democrats refused to support any short-term spending measure unless these subsidies were protected, while Republicans maintained that health care funding should be addressed in separate policy discussions. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson accused Democrats of leveraging the American people in a high-stakes political game, further intensifying the partisan tensions surrounding the crisis.

Continuous discussions filled the halls of Congress, with lawmakers fiercely debating funding measures. The deadlock was eventually broken when eight senators crossed party lines to reach a compromise. This bipartisan agreement allowed the funding bill to pass first in the Senate and then in the House of Representatives by a narrow 222-209 vote margin. President Trump signed the bill into law in the Oval Office, marking the restoration of government operations.

The funding bill included critical provisions aimed at mitigating the damage caused by the shutdown. It rescinded the Trump administration’s decision to fire federal employees during the shutdown and guaranteed back pay as operations resumed. Additionally, protections against future layoffs were established through January, providing stability for federal workers and contractors. Key food assistance and agricultural programs received renewed funding, ensuring uninterrupted support for families reliant on these benefits until the end of the budget year.

Security measures were also addressed in the legislation, with $203.5 million allocated for lawmaker protection and an additional $28 million designated for the safety of Supreme Court justices. However, a controversial provision was added that allowed senators to pursue damages up to $500,000 if government investigators accessed electronic records without prior notification. This last-minute addition drew bipartisan criticism, including from Speaker Johnson, who expressed frustration over its inclusion.

The legislative stalemate primarily revolved around the fate of the expiring enhanced tax credits. Without congressional action, premiums for Affordable Care Act marketplace plans were projected to double, potentially leaving over two million Americans without health coverage. Republicans argued that pandemic-era enhancements should not continue, pointing to the expiration date set when the subsidies were enacted. Conversely, Democrats vowed to continue fighting for the extension, asserting that the debate was “just getting started.” While the passage of the funding bill provided immediate relief, it did not resolve the ongoing dispute over health care subsidies, with a further Senate vote promised by mid-December, though its success remained uncertain.

In the immediate aftermath of the shutdown, lawmakers expressed frustration over how the situation was handled and the hardships it inflicted on federal employees and everyday Americans. The interruption highlighted the deep ideological rifts within Washington, complicating the governing process. President Trump seized the opportunity to emphasize Republican priorities, urging voters to remember the shutdown in future elections. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders such as Hakeem Jeffries and Nancy Pelosi reaffirmed their commitment to expanding health care access, focusing on the affordability crisis that arose as premiums surged.

Despite the shutdown’s conclusion, uncertainty persists as Congress braces for future budget battles and health care negotiations. The compromise measure funds most government operations through January 30, 2026, but lasting solutions remain elusive. The events of the past 43 days serve as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges in balancing legislative priorities, political interests, and the well-being of millions of Americans.

Source: Original article

Surge in Whooping Cough Cases Triggers Health Alerts in Southern State

Staff ReporterHealth, Politics, USA 0

Texas is experiencing a significant surge in whooping cough cases, with over 3,500 infections reported this year, prompting health officials to emphasize the importance of vaccinations.

Texas health officials are raising concerns over a dramatic increase in whooping cough cases, a common childhood illness. The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) reported this week that the number of whooping cough infections has nearly quadrupled compared to the same time last year.

Provisional data indicates that Texas has recorded over 3,500 cases of whooping cough, also known as pertussis, through October 2023. This marks the second consecutive year that the state has seen a significant rise in cases, leading to the issuance of a health alert.

Pertussis is a highly contagious respiratory infection caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis, according to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The illness typically begins with symptoms resembling a common cold, such as a runny nose, sneezing, and a mild cough. However, it can escalate into severe coughing fits that may culminate in a high-pitched “whoop” as the individual gasps for air.

The progression of whooping cough generally occurs in three stages: initial cold-like symptoms, followed by violent coughing episodes, and finally a gradual recovery, as noted by the Cleveland Clinic. While anyone can contract whooping cough, the most severe complications are observed in infants aged 12 months and younger. Babies are at a higher risk of hospitalization, especially if they are immunocompromised or not vaccinated.

In infants, the classic “whoop” sound may not be present. Instead, they may exhibit difficulty breathing or experience pauses in breathing, according to the Cleveland Clinic. Teenagers and adults can also become infected, often due to waning vaccine protection, but they typically experience milder symptoms.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends pertussis vaccinations for individuals of all ages. Texas health leaders emphasize the importance of staying up to date with vaccinations to combat fading immunity. Pregnant women are advised to receive a Tdap shot during each pregnancy, ideally between 27 and 36 weeks, to help protect their newborns. Additionally, adults who are in close contact with infants should be vaccinated at least two weeks prior to exposure, according to health officials.

Clinicians are encouraged to test anyone exhibiting symptoms consistent with pertussis. Treatment can begin based on a “strong clinical suspicion” or known exposure to the disease. PCR tests are preferred due to their speed and availability.

Early treatment, regardless of vaccination history, is crucial for preventing severe illness and curbing the spread of the infection, officials stress.

Source: Original article

GOPIO International Hosts Luncheon with Former Indian Minister Meenakshi Lekhi

Staff ReporterNation, USA 0

The Global Organization of People of Indian Origin (GOPIO) International hosted a luncheon featuring former Indian Minister Meenakshi Lekhi, emphasizing the Indian Diaspora’s impact on global STEM fields.

The Global Organization of People of Indian Origin (GOPIO) International, along with its New York chapters, hosted a memorable Meet and Greet luncheon on November 5th at Hotel Lexington Plaza in Manhattan. The event featured Smt. Meenakshi Lekhi, the former Minister of State for External Affairs and Culture of India, and attracted a diverse audience of GOPIO members, chapter officials, community leaders, and media representatives.

The luncheon was skillfully hosted by GOPIO Life Member Ashok Bhatt, who welcomed the attendees and set the tone for the gathering. GOPIO Chairman Dr. Thomas Abraham delivered an impassioned speech about the organization’s mission and its numerous accomplishments in empowering People of Indian Origin (PIOs) around the globe. He highlighted the importance of community engagement and the role of the diaspora in fostering connections between India and its citizens abroad.

GOPIO President Prakash Shah provided a historical overview of the Indian Diaspora, tracing its roots back to ancient times. He emphasized the cultural significance of Indian heritage, particularly in Southeast Asia, where magnificent Hindu temples still stand as testaments to the enduring influence of Indian culture. Shah underscored the necessity for India to strengthen its ties with the global diaspora, which now numbers over 35 million people.

Smt. Meenakshi Lekhi addressed the audience, highlighting the pivotal role that the Indian Diaspora plays in the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in Western countries. She acknowledged the contributions of the diaspora in enhancing India’s global standing and took the time to answer questions from attendees, offering insightful perspectives on various topics.

As a token of appreciation, GOPIO presented Smt. Lekhi with collector’s items, including two designs of First Day Covers released by the U.S. Postal Service during the First Global Convention of People of Indian Origin in New York in 1989. This historic event marked the inception of GOPIO and served as a reminder of the organization’s long-standing commitment to the Indian community worldwide.

The luncheon exemplified GOPIO’s ongoing dedication to fostering connections among the global Indian community, celebrating cultural heritage, and promoting professional and social advancement.

Source: Original article

Trump Signs Legislation to End Historic Government Shutdown

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

President Trump has signed legislation to end the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, providing funding through January 30 and addressing critical issues affecting federal workers and programs.

President Donald Trump has officially signed legislation that brings an end to the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, which lasted more than 40 days. The new funding measure will keep the government operational through January 30, 2025.

On Monday, Trump indicated that the government would soon reopen, as the effects of the shutdown became increasingly severe. Federal workers faced missed paychecks, and air travel was disrupted due to staffing shortages among air traffic controllers.

The legislation maintains government funding at the same levels for the fiscal year 2025, allowing additional time for lawmakers to negotiate a more comprehensive appropriations bill for fiscal year 2026. Importantly, the measure also secures funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which supports over 42 million Americans in purchasing groceries through a debit card system. This funding will continue through September.

In addition to reopening the government, the new measure reverses layoffs that the Trump administration had initiated earlier in October and ensures that employees will receive compensation for their time away from work.

The resolution comes after a prolonged stalemate between Senate Republicans and Democrats over a stopgap spending bill intended to fund the government through November 21. Following a funding lapse that began on October 1, the Senate passed the new legislation late Monday night with a 60-40 vote. Eight Democrats joined their Republican colleagues in supporting the measure.

The House of Representatives subsequently approved its version of the bill on Wednesday, facilitating the government’s reopening.

The shutdown’s fallout had reached critical levels, particularly at U.S. airports where air traffic controllers and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officers were required to work without pay. Many of these workers began calling in sick or seeking additional employment, leading to further staffing shortages and flight delays.

The impasse between Republicans and Democrats stemmed from disagreements over healthcare provisions included in the funding measure. Trump and Republican leaders accused Democrats of attempting to extend healthcare benefits to illegal immigrants, citing a provision that would repeal parts of Trump’s tax and domestic policy bill, which had reduced Medicaid eligibility for non-U.S. citizens.

Democrats countered these claims, asserting that their goal was to permanently extend certain Affordable Care Act subsidies set to expire at the end of 2025. Although the stopgap spending bill signed by Trump does not extend these subsidies, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has agreed to hold a vote in December on legislation to continue these credits.

However, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., has not yet committed to supporting this arrangement in the House, leaving the future of healthcare funding uncertain.

As the government reopens, the focus will shift to addressing the underlying issues that led to the shutdown and ensuring that federal workers and essential services can operate without further disruptions.

Source: Original article

China Strengthens Ties with Venezuela as Maduro Regime Seeks Support

Staff ReporterPolitics, World 0

As U.S. tensions rise, China deepens its economic ties with Venezuela, presenting a challenge to American influence in the region amid military posturing by Washington.

As President Donald Trump emphasizes a “zero tolerance” policy towards narco-states in the Americas, China is significantly increasing its economic presence in Venezuela. This move poses a high-stakes gamble that could soon clash with U.S. interests.

U.S. defense officials confirmed last month that an aircraft carrier strike group has entered the Southern Command region, which encompasses the Caribbean and northern South America. This deployment aims to monitor narcotrafficking routes associated with Venezuela’s military leadership. The Pentagon stated that the USS Gerald R. Ford, which carries over 4,000 sailors and numerous tactical aircraft, is tasked with enhancing the U.S. capacity to detect, monitor, and disrupt illicit activities. The mission’s overarching goal is to degrade and dismantle transnational criminal organizations.

In response to the U.S. military buildup, reports indicate that Venezuelan officers are training for guerrilla-style defense against a potential U.S. strike, reflecting a growing sense of anxiety within Caracas.

Amid these tensions, China has announced a “zero-tariff” trade agreement with Venezuela during the Shanghai Expo 2025. Deputy Minister for Foreign Trade Coromoto Godoy revealed that the agreement encompasses approximately 400 tariff categories, eliminating duties on goods exchanged between the two nations. While the specifics of the implementation remain to be confirmed, the intent is clear: China is rapidly integrating itself into a Venezuelan economy that has faced extensive sanctions from Washington.

Gordon Chang, an expert on China’s global trade strategy, remarked, “This really looks like China is going to completely take over the Venezuelan economy. It’s going to decimate Venezuela’s local industry.” He noted that Venezuela primarily exports petroleum to China, with little else to offer. “Venezuelan manufacturing is not going to experience a renaissance anytime soon; it’s going the opposite direction,” he added.

Chang further suggested that Maduro’s pivot toward Beijing is driven by concerns over Trump’s administration. “Maduro probably doesn’t have a choice,” he stated. “He realizes he’s got a problem in the form of Donald J. Trump. There’s a U.S. aircraft carrier not far from his shores, and a lot of military assets bearing down on him. He needs a friend, and he’s desperate.” He cautioned that while the zero-tariff pact may provide temporary relief, it ultimately deepens Venezuela’s reliance on China.

From China’s perspective, the tariff-free agreement opens a strategic and commercial gateway into the Western Hemisphere as the U.S. intensifies its sanctions. The Council on Foreign Relations estimates that China has extended around $60 billion in loans to Venezuela over the past two decades, much of which has been repaid through oil shipments. This figure continues to be cited by both Chinese and Venezuelan officials as recently as 2025.

Isaias Medina III, an Edward Mason Fellow at Harvard University and a former Venezuelan diplomat, explained that China has leveraged substantial loans and established satellite positioning and surveillance facilities to secure strategic control over Venezuela’s natural resources and critical infrastructure. He pointed to the El Sombrero satellite ground station in Venezuela’s Guárico province as a joint project that enhances China’s intelligence capabilities in Latin America.

Medina emphasized that the new trade pact is part of a broader anti-Western alignment. “Under the banner of so-called ‘21st Century Socialism,’ initiated by Hugo Chávez and expanded by Nicolás Maduro, the nation has evolved into a forward operating base for regimes openly hostile to the United States and its allies,” he stated. He highlighted the presence of Iran, Russia, China, and Cuba in Venezuela, using the country as a platform for asymmetric warfare and ideological expansion throughout Latin America.

He noted that Russia’s military involvement includes over $12 billion in arms sales and ongoing defense cooperation, while Cuban military advisers remain embedded within Venezuelan security institutions. Additionally, Iran has utilized this environment to establish terrorist proxies such as Hezbollah and Hamas, turning Venezuela into both a financial hub and a logistical corridor for their operations.

Medina criticized the Maduro government for replacing statecraft with criminal enterprise, stating, “Grand corruption is not the exception; it is the system.” He also pointed out the catastrophic humanitarian toll, with over 30% of Venezuela’s population forcibly displaced and starvation weaponized as a tool of social control, which constitutes a war crime under international law.

Despite the severity of these issues, many United Nations member states continue to recognize and engage with the Maduro regime, perpetuating its impunity. Medina warned that the failure to confront this crisis decisively allows a coalition of adversaries, both state and non-state actors, to project power dangerously close to U.S. territory.

Currently, Washington’s sanctions campaign continues to limit Venezuela’s oil lifelines. In March 2025, reports indicated that U.S. threats to impose tariffs on nations purchasing Venezuelan crude temporarily disrupted shipments to China. Beijing dismissed these measures as “illegal extraterritorial actions” and pledged to maintain cooperation, although it has not clarified how it will implement the new tariff-free agreement.

Chang concluded that the fundamental reality remains unchanged: China lacks the military capacity to protect Caracas from U.S. intervention. “It can certainly launch a propaganda blitz,” he said, “but it can’t project military force in the region. It’s really up to what President Trump does.” Medina echoed this sentiment, stating that the stakes extend beyond economics, as Venezuela has become a nexus for organized crime, drug trafficking, money laundering, and human rights violations, urging a comprehensive Western response.

Source: Original article

Dinesh D’Souza Supports Trump Following Controversy Over H-1B Comments

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Politics 0

President Donald Trump’s recent comments on H-1B visas have ignited controversy within his “Make America Great Again” base, prompting mixed reactions from supporters and critics alike.

President Donald Trump’s recent remarks regarding H-1B visas have sparked renewed debate within his “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) base. His comments suggest a potential softening of his previously hardline immigration stance.

During an interview with Fox News, Trump stated that the United States is open to “foreign talent” who can contribute to specialized sectors. This statement has been perceived by many supporters as a surprising departure from his earlier “America First” rhetoric.

When asked if reforming the H-1B visa program remains a priority, Trump responded affirmatively, emphasizing the need to attract skilled individuals. “I agree, but you also have to bring this talent,” he said. He acknowledged the importance of raising wages for American workers but argued that the country cannot rely solely on the long-term unemployed to fill advanced positions in critical industries such as manufacturing and defense.

Trump firmly rejected the notion that the U.S. has enough homegrown talent to meet its needs. “You don’t have certain talents… And people have to learn,” he stated. “You can’t take people off an unemployment line and say, I’m going to put you into a factory. We’re going to make missiles.”

The president’s comments quickly ignited backlash among his core supporters, many of whom took to social media to express their anger and disappointment. On X, several users accused Trump of abandoning the “America First” agenda and yielding to corporate interests by favoring foreign labor over American workers.

One user lamented, “Thanks for doing your job. It’s too bad POTUS turned his back on the American people and sold us out to foreigners and big corporations.” Another user pointed out, “Maybe POTUS doesn’t know we have engineers and techies who are on that unemployment line, or far underemployed because the companies who hire H-1Bs don’t advertise to Americans. Ignorance is not becoming in a president.”

Another supporter expressed deep disappointment, stating, “When a president loses faith in his own people, he forfeits the nation’s soul. To distrust your citizens while flooding the country with 600,000 students from a rival power isn’t leadership—it’s betrayal. A nation without trust cannot stand.”

Critics were vocal about their discontent, with one user describing Trump’s response as “horrific” and “insulting” to the hundreds of thousands of displaced workers in the tech industry. Another user remarked, “I don’t know who you are lady, but you just absolutely permanently destroyed what remained of the positive image that I, and many others, had of Trump. Thanks for revealing who he really is.”

In contrast, Indian American conservative commentator and longtime Trump supporter Dinesh D’Souza came to the president’s defense, urging fellow Republicans to look past the outrage. He dismissed the critics who accused Trump of betraying American workers, labeling their outrage as misplaced.

D’Souza challenged those who claimed the president had softened his stance on H-1B visas, arguing that such critics were contradicting themselves. “Many people: Our education system sucks! It’s all indoctrination, no real learning. Standards have plummeted. The same people: Is Trump seriously saying our graduates are not the best in the world and can do any job you can think of? Let’s at least get our stories straight,” he wrote on social media.

The ongoing debate over Trump’s comments on H-1B visas highlights the deep divisions within conservative circles regarding immigration policy. For Trump, the challenge lies in balancing his nationalist rhetoric with the economic realities of a globalized labor market, where innovation often relies on international talent.

As discussions continue, it remains to be seen how this episode will influence Trump’s standing among his supporters and the broader implications for immigration policy in the United States.

Source: Original article

Tobacco and Nicotine Ban Faces Backlash from Coastal Town Business Owners

Staff ReporterHealth, Nation 0

A Bay Area town has enacted a comprehensive tobacco sales ban, prompting backlash from local business owners, with new restrictions on nicotine products scheduled to take effect this December.

A coastal town in the Bay Area has taken a significant step towards public health by passing a comprehensive ban on tobacco sales, despite facing opposition from small business owners. Tiburon, California, recently saw its town council unanimously approve an ordinance that prohibits the sale of all tobacco products, including cigarettes, cigars, vapes, e-cigarettes, and other nicotine items. This new regulation is set to take effect in December.

Tiburon Mayor Holli Thier expressed her support for the ban, stating, “I am pleased to have sponsored and voted to save lives and save our environment.” She emphasized the urgency of the situation, noting that local youth in Marin County are vaping at twice the national average. “It is critical that we take all efforts to reduce teen addiction,” Thier added. “By banning all tobacco sales here in Tiburon, we are preventing youth from getting addicted and protecting our environment.” The mayor highlighted that cigarettes are a major source of single-use plastic pollution, which adversely affects rivers, bays, and oceans worldwide.

The ordinance has garnered support from local youth, particularly from the Youth Advocacy Committee (YAC), a group of high school students from across Marin County. During town council meetings, YAC members advocated for the ban, emphasizing the need to protect the health and future of young people. Diana Garcia, a YAC student, urged council members to continue supporting the amendment, stating, “You have a chance to set an example for communities to follow.”

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), nearly 50 million U.S. adults reported using some form of tobacco product in 2022. The CDC also highlights the severe health risks associated with smoking, noting that it causes over 480,000 deaths each year and harms nearly every organ in the body, leading to various diseases. The 2023 County Health Rankings & Roadmaps report from the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine recognized Marin County as the healthiest county in California, underscoring the community’s commitment to improving public health.

Despite the health benefits touted by supporters of the ban, local business owners have expressed significant concerns. The California Fuels & Convenience Alliance submitted a letter to the town council opposing the ordinance. The letter argued that the complete prohibition on tobacco sales sends a discouraging message to small businesses and entrepreneurs. “Small businesses, including convenience stores and gas stations, are essential to communities and provide residents with convenient access to everyday necessities,” the letter stated.

The alliance further contended that such sweeping prohibitions, rather than reasonable regulations, create an unpredictable environment for small businesses, potentially discouraging entrepreneurship and investment in Tiburon. As the town prepares for the implementation of this ordinance, the debate between public health initiatives and the interests of local businesses continues to unfold.

As Tiburon moves forward with its tobacco sales ban, it remains to be seen how this decision will impact the local economy and the community’s health outcomes in the long run.

Source: Original article

U.S. Investigates 175 Employers for H-1B Visa Fraud Allegations

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Visa 0

The U.S. Department of Labor is investigating over 175 employers for potential H-1B visa fraud as part of its enforcement initiative, Project Firewall, aimed at protecting American jobs.

The United States Department of Labor has initiated a comprehensive investigation into more than 175 suspected cases of fraud within the H-1B visa program. This move underscores a determined effort to protect American jobs and ensure adherence to legal hiring practices. The investigations are part of “Project Firewall,” an enforcement initiative launched in September 2025, shortly after the introduction of a one-time $100,000 fee on H-1B visa applications by former President Donald Trump.

At the forefront of this initiative is Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, who has personally authorized each investigation, marking an unprecedented approach for the department. In her remarks, she emphasized the importance of this crackdown, stating, “Rooting out fraud and abuse will guarantee that highly skilled jobs are prioritized for Americans first as we work to restore our nation’s economic strength.” The administration has reiterated its commitment to protecting the American workforce by holding employers accountable for any attempts to circumvent regulations and exploit foreign workers.

Project Firewall aims to address ongoing abuses within the H-1B visa process, ensuring that it serves both American talent and genuinely skilled foreign workers. Investigations have revealed several troubling patterns of misconduct. For instance, some employers have been found to pay highly qualified visa holders significantly less than the wages promised in official documents. This practice not only undermines job prospects for American professionals but also pressures U.S. workers with similar qualifications to accept lower pay to remain competitive.

Another concerning issue involves fraudulent Labor Condition Applications (LCA) submitted by employers. The LCA process requires employers to notify their existing American workforce before hiring H-1B, H-1B1, or E-3 visa holders. Reports indicate that some companies have listed fictitious or non-existent work locations on these forms, misled workers about their job assignments, and failed to promptly report employee terminations. This has resulted in inaccurate records with authorities being maintained for weeks or even months. Furthermore, there have been documented cases where salaries did not match those detailed in the applications, and some job postings appeared to be generic templates with little relation to actual job roles.

The exploitation of foreign workers extends beyond these discrepancies. Some individuals have been paid less than the rates specified in the LCAs and have been excluded from wage cycles while awaiting new projects, which constitutes a clear violation of federal policy. Such inconsistencies not only harm visa holders but also depress wages across the labor market, creating an uneven playing field for American employees.

If companies are found guilty of these violations, they may face several penalties, including the recovery of owed back wages, civil financial penalties, and suspension from participating in the H-1B visa program for a specified duration. The Department of Labor has committed to utilizing all available resources under Project Firewall to audit and enforce compliance. This effort is not only aimed at correcting past abuses but also at deterring future misconduct within the highly scrutinized H-1B visa sector.

Source: Original article

Bill to Prevent Government Shutdown Passes Key Hurdle in House

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

The House is poised to vote on a bipartisan bill aimed at ending the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, following its successful passage through a key committee.

The House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on Wednesday on a measure to end the ongoing government shutdown, which has now lasted for 42 days. This follows the bill’s successful advancement through the House Rules Committee earlier in the morning.

The bipartisan agreement to reopen the federal government received unanimous support from Republicans in the committee, while all Democrats opposed it. The bill is now set to move to the full House, where sources familiar with discussions among GOP leaders indicate that it is expected to pass with strong Republican backing.

Clearing the House Rules Committee is a significant milestone in the effort to end the shutdown, which has become the longest in U.S. history, surpassing previous records by about a week. The committee’s hearing, which began on Tuesday evening, lasted more than six hours, concluding shortly after 1 a.m. on Wednesday.

During the hearing, Democrats attempted to introduce amendments related to COVID-19-era enhanced subsidies for Obamacare, which are set to expire at the end of the year. However, these attempts were unsuccessful. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., made a notable appearance, advocating for his amendment to extend those subsidies for an additional three years.

The lengthy debate saw heated exchanges between members of both parties. Democrats accused Republicans of neglecting Americans’ healthcare needs and taking an extended “vacation” while their constituents suffered during the shutdown. In response, House Rules Committee Chairwoman Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., expressed her frustration, stating, “I am sick and tired of hearing you all say we had an eight-week vacation. I worked every day. I don’t know about you. I don’t want to hear another soul say that.”

Additionally, both Democrats and some Republicans criticized a provision in the funding bill that would allow GOP senators to sue the federal government for $500,000 over the alleged secret acquisition of their phone records during the investigation led by ex-Special Counsel Jack Smith. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, voiced concerns about the perception of this provision, suggesting it could be seen as self-serving.

Following the committee’s approval, the bill will undergo a “rule vote” in the House, a procedural step that, if successful, will allow for further debate on the legislation. A final vote is anticipated later on Wednesday, potentially sending the bill to President Donald Trump for his signature.

President Trump has indicated his support for the legislation, stating in comments to reporters on Monday, “We’ll be opening up our country very quickly,” when asked about the deal.

The Senate had previously broken a weeks-long deadlock on Monday night, passing the legislation with a 60-40 vote. This included support from eight Democrats who joined Republicans in the effort to reopen the government.

As the shutdown continues, travel disruptions have been reported at U.S. airports, with air traffic controllers and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officers working without pay since last month. Many of these employees have taken on second jobs to make ends meet, leading to staffing shortages and flight delays that threaten to impact the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday.

Millions of Americans who depend on federal food assistance programs are also facing uncertainty amid the ongoing partisan disputes over funding. The proposed bill aims to extend federal funding levels for fiscal year 2025 through January 30, allowing negotiators additional time to reach a longer-term agreement for fiscal year 2026.

Furthermore, the legislation would advance funding for several key departments, including the Department of Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and military construction. These departments are part of a larger package of 12 individual bills that constitute Congress’ annual appropriations, collectively referred to as a “minibus.”

In a notable concession to Democrats, the deal would reverse federal layoffs that occurred during the Trump administration in October, ensuring that affected workers receive back pay for their time off. Additionally, a side deal reached in the Senate guarantees Senate Democrats a vote on legislation to extend the enhanced Obamacare subsidies, which are set to expire at the end of the year. However, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has not made a similar commitment for a vote in the House.

Source: Original article

Sunil Chhetri and Others Urge Resolution Amid ISL Deadlock

Staff ReporterNation India, Sports 0

Sunil Chhetri and other prominent figures in Indian football are calling on the All India Football Federation to take urgent action to resume the Indian Super League season.

Sunil Chhetri, the veteran striker for the Indian national football team, has made a heartfelt appeal to the All India Football Federation (AIFF) to take decisive measures aimed at restarting the Indian Super League (ISL) season.

Chhetri’s plea comes amid growing concerns over the prolonged deadlock affecting the league, which has left players, fans, and stakeholders anxious about the future of professional football in India.

The ISL, which has become a cornerstone of Indian football since its inception, not only showcases local talent but also attracts international players and coaches, contributing significantly to the sport’s growth in the country.

Chhetri emphasized the importance of the league for the development of football in India, stating that it serves as a platform for young players to showcase their skills and gain valuable experience. He expressed that the current situation feels like “a very dark tunnel” for many involved in the sport.

In his statement, Chhetri urged the AIFF to prioritize the resumption of the league, highlighting the need for a collaborative approach to address the challenges that have led to the current impasse. He believes that with concerted efforts, the league can return to action, benefiting players and fans alike.

The ongoing deadlock has raised questions about the future of the league, with many stakeholders expressing their concerns over the potential impact on player contracts, sponsorship deals, and overall interest in football within the country.

Chhetri’s call to action has resonated with other players and coaches, who share his sentiments regarding the urgency of the situation. The collective voice of the football community is becoming increasingly important as they seek to navigate these challenging times.

As discussions continue among the AIFF and other stakeholders, the hope remains that a resolution can be reached soon, allowing the ISL to resume and restore the excitement and passion that football brings to millions of fans across India.

According to Source Name, the future of the ISL hangs in the balance, and the actions taken in the coming weeks will be crucial for the league’s revival.

Source: Original article

The Most Common Google Search Scam That Affects Everyone

Staff ReporterPolitics, Security, Technology 0

The rise of fake customer service numbers on Google has led to a surge in remote access scams, putting users’ privacy and security at risk.

In an age where online searches are often the first step to resolving issues, a troubling trend has emerged: scammers are exploiting Google search results to deceive unsuspecting users. When faced with a problem related to banking or deliveries, many individuals instinctively search for the company’s customer service number. Unfortunately, this common practice has become a significant trap for scammers, resulting in financial loss and compromised personal security.

One alarming account comes from a man named Gabriel, who reached out for help after a distressing experience. He recounted, “I called my bank to check on some charges I didn’t authorize. I called the number on the bank statement, but they told me to go online. I googled the company and dialed the first number that popped up. Some foreign guy got on the phone, and I explained about the charges. Somehow, he took control of my phone, where I didn’t have any control. I tried to shut it down and hang up, but I couldn’t. He ended up sending an explicit text message to my 16-year-old daughter. How do I prove I didn’t send that message? Please help.”

Gabriel’s experience is not an isolated incident. This type of scam, known as a remote access support scam, involves scammers posing as legitimate bank or tech support representatives. They trick victims into installing software that grants them control over the victim’s device. Once they gain access, they can steal sensitive information, send unauthorized messages, or lock users out of their own devices.

Search engines, including Google, often prioritize paid advertisements in their results. Scammers capitalize on this by purchasing ad space to appear above legitimate customer service numbers. These fraudulent listings can look remarkably professional, complete with company logos and seemingly authentic toll-free numbers. When victims call these numbers, they are greeted by scammers who sound knowledgeable and trustworthy, further lowering their defenses.

Once the scammer establishes trust, they typically instruct the victim to download remote access software, such as AnyDesk or TeamViewer. This software allows the scammer to take control of the victim’s device, leading to potentially devastating consequences.

In light of Gabriel’s harrowing experience, it is crucial for individuals to take immediate action if they suspect they have fallen victim to such a scam. The first step is to turn off the compromised device immediately. Restarting the phone in Airplane Mode and avoiding Wi-Fi connections can help prevent further unauthorized access. Running a full antivirus scan with reliable software is also essential to identify and remove any malicious programs.

Victims should use a secure device that has not been compromised to reset passwords for key accounts, including email, cloud storage, and banking logins. Creating strong, unique passwords for each account and enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) can provide an additional layer of security.

It is also advisable to check if the victim’s email has been exposed in previous data breaches. Utilizing a password manager with a built-in breach scanner can help identify if personal information has been compromised. If any matches are found, it is crucial to change reused passwords and secure those accounts with new credentials.

Victims should inform their phone provider about the unauthorized access and request a check for any remote management apps or SIM-swap activity. Additionally, notifying the bank’s fraud department and reporting the fake number found on Google is vital. Keeping records of all communications, including screenshots, can be helpful if local law enforcement needs to be involved.

To further protect against such scams, individuals should always verify customer service numbers by typing the company’s official web address directly into their browser or using the contact information printed on their bank statements or cards. Scammers often create fake numbers that appear in search results, hoping to mislead users.

It is essential to remain calm when faced with urgent requests for action, as scammers often rely on panic to manipulate victims. If someone insists on immediate action or requests the installation of software like AnyDesk or TeamViewer, it is crucial to hang up and verify the situation through official channels.

Installing and regularly updating a trusted antivirus application can help block remote access tools and spyware before they gain access to devices. Regular scans can also detect hidden threats that may already exist on a phone or computer.

As the internet continues to evolve, so too do the tactics employed by scammers. While the convenience of online searches can be beneficial, it also opens the door for fraudulent activities that can compromise personal security. By taking proactive measures and staying informed, individuals can better protect themselves from falling victim to these deceptive schemes.

As the prevalence of fake customer service numbers increases, the question arises: should search engines like Google bear some responsibility for protecting users from these scams? This ongoing debate highlights the need for vigilance and awareness in an increasingly digital world.

Source: Original article

New York Mayor Mamdani and London Mayor Khan Discuss Challenges in Podcast

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

New York City’s first Muslim mayor, Zohran Mamdani, and London’s Sadiq Khan share a faith and progressive vision, yet their political journeys highlight significant differences shaped by their unique cities.

New York City’s first Muslim mayor, Zohran Mamdani, has drawn considerable comparisons to London’s Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan. While both leaders share a progressive outlook and a Muslim identity, their political journeys reveal important differences. Critics have suggested that New York under Mamdani might follow “the way of London,” but the distinct political and social dynamics of the two cities mean that the parallels extend only so far.

Sadiq Khan, who has served as London’s mayor since 2016, is a seasoned politician well-versed in the pressures of governing a global city under intense scrutiny. He has faced persistent criticism and racist attacks, including harsh condemnation from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who labeled him a “stone cold loser” and falsely accused him of wanting to impose Sharia law. Khan responded to these attacks by branding Trump as “racist, sexist, misogynistic, and Islamophobic.” Despite these challenges, Khan has successfully won three consecutive elections and has focused on improving transit, housing, and air quality in London.

In contrast, Zohran Mamdani, at 34, comes from a different background but shares Khan’s progressive vision. Born in Uganda to Indian immigrant parents and raised in the United States, Mamdani represents a new generation of grassroots activism and left-wing politics, heavily influenced by figures like Bernie Sanders. His campaign prioritized issues such as affordable housing, free childcare, and combating corruption. In his victory speech, Mamdani directly challenged Trump’s efforts to undermine his election, urging the city to reject divisiveness.

The BBC podcast titled “A Tale of Two Cities: London’s Lesson for New York’s First Muslim Mayor,” produced by Xandra Ellin, Valerio Esposito, and Cat Farnsworth, delves into these parallels in detail. The podcast features interviews with former BBC reporter Tim Donovan and Sadiq Khan himself, discussing the challenges of leading two of the world’s most diverse and dynamic metropolises. Khan emphasizes the importance of focusing on substantive policies rather than identity politics, a lesson that could prove beneficial for Mamdani as he navigates his new role.

Despite their shared religion and progressive values, Khan and Mamdani are confronted with unique political climates that will shape their leadership styles differently. Both have become targets of far-right rhetoric, yet their responses demonstrate resilience and a commitment to their cities. As Mamdani begins his tenure, the experiences of London offer valuable insights but also highlight that success will depend on navigating local challenges with strategy and coalition-building.

Source: Original article

Car Explosion Near Delhi’s Red Fort Kills Eight, Injures 24

Staff ReporterConflict, Nation, Security 0

A powerful explosion near Delhi’s Red Fort on November 10, 2025, resulted in eight fatalities and 24 injuries, prompting a high alert across the region.

A devastating explosion occurred in a Hyundai i20 car near Gate No. 1 of the Red Fort Metro Station in Delhi on the evening of November 10, 2025. The blast tragically claimed the lives of at least eight individuals and left 24 others injured. The explosion caused extensive damage to nearby vehicles and shattered windows in the bustling area, leading to widespread panic and a swift emergency response.

In response to the incident, seven fire tenders were dispatched to the scene. Teams from the Delhi Police Special Cell, the National Investigation Agency (NIA), the National Security Guard (NSG), and forensic experts quickly arrived to investigate the cause of the explosion. Authorities cordoned off the area and placed Delhi and neighboring regions on high alert.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah reported that the explosion occurred around 7 PM at the Subhash Marg traffic signal, close to the Red Fort. Law enforcement teams reached the site within ten minutes to initiate their investigation. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been briefed on the situation, expressing condolences and pledging support for the victims. Shah also visited the hospital where the injured were being treated and has maintained communication with intelligence officials as the investigation progresses.

Delhi Police Commissioner Satish Golcha confirmed that the blast took place while the Hyundai i20 was stopped at a traffic light, resulting in damage to several nearby vehicles. As of now, investigations are ongoing, and authorities are exploring all possibilities, including potential links to terrorism. The high-intensity explosion and subsequent fires disrupted traffic and business activities, leading to the closure of the Chandni Chowk market amid heightened security measures.

Officials are urging residents to remain calm and to rely solely on official updates as the investigation unfolds. Delhi’s Chief Minister Rekha Gupta has assured that all necessary assistance is being provided to those affected and has called for public cooperation to prevent the spread of misinformation on social media.

Source: Original article

Stefanik Honored with Jewish Award Following New York Governor Bid Announcement

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Rep. Elise Stefanik received the World Jewish Congress’ highest honor while launching her campaign for New York governor, pledging to combat rising antisemitism in the state.

Rep. Elise Stefanik accepted the World Jewish Congress’ prestigious Theodor Herzl Award on Monday night, just days after announcing her candidacy for New York governor. During her speech at the Museum of Modern Art in Manhattan, she emphasized her commitment to fighting antisemitism and upholding what she described as “the very Western values that have shaped America.”

Stefanik received the award from Ronald Lauder, a businessman and former U.S. ambassador to Austria under President Ronald Reagan. The Theodor Herzl Award, established in 2012, is the highest honor given by the World Jewish Congress, recognizing individuals who embody Herzl’s vision for a secure and self-reliant Jewish community.

In her acceptance speech, Stefanik expressed gratitude to Lauder for his leadership and dedication to Jewish unity and security. “Under his leadership, the World Jewish Congress has carried forward Theodor Herzl’s vision — not only of a Jewish homeland, but of a Jewish people strong, self-reliant, and respected among the nations,” she stated.

Stefanik described the honor as “deeply humbling,” acknowledging the World Jewish Congress as a longstanding diplomatic voice and moral conscience for Jewish communities worldwide. She praised the organization for its efforts to combat antisemitism and strengthen ties between Israel and the global community of free nations.

Reflecting on her experiences in Congress, Stefanik recounted a notable 2023 hearing with the presidents of Harvard, MIT, and the University of Pennsylvania, where she posed a critical moral question regarding antisemitism. “Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate your university’s code of conduct?” she asked. Her expectation for a straightforward answer was met with a troubling response: “it depends on the context.” She asserted that this exchange sparked a global reckoning and accountability in higher education regarding antisemitism.

As she turned her focus to New York, Stefanik declared the state “the epicenter of the battle for the very Western values that have shaped America.” She emphasized the urgency of addressing antisemitism, bigotry, and anti-Americanism, particularly in a state with a significant Jewish population. “Eighty years after Kristallnacht, we must not stay silent. I will continue to call out antisemitism,” she affirmed, noting that antisemitic incidents in New York reached an all-time high last year.

Stefanik’s remarks resonated with the audience, as she invoked Theodor Herzl’s legacy, stating, “My friends, Theodor Herzl’s story is not ancient history. That is the spirit I see in this room tonight — the spirit that built Israel, the spirit that has always animated the Jewish people, and the spirit that will save New York.”

The award ceremony came a day after billionaire philanthropist Miriam Adelson publicly endorsed Stefanik’s gubernatorial campaign during the Zionist Organization of America’s Justice Louis D. Brandeis Award Dinner. Adelson praised Stefanik for her efforts to confront antisemitism on college campuses, recalling her late husband Sheldon Adelson’s emphasis on moral conviction.

Stefanik, who serves as chairwoman of the House Republican Leadership, was also honored with the Zionist Organization of America’s Mortimer Zuckerman Maccabee Warrior Award for her advocacy against antisemitism. Adelson introduced her at the gala, calling her “a great leader” and commending her commitment to defending the Jewish people, Israel, and the Free World.

With her gubernatorial campaign officially launched, Stefanik is set to challenge Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul in the 2026 election. Once critical of former President Donald Trump during his first presidential run, Stefanik has since become one of his most ardent supporters in Congress.

Fox News Digital has reached out to Gov. Hochul’s office for a comment regarding Stefanik’s campaign.

Source: Original article

Government Shutdown Impacts Overseas Bases, Straining Military Personnel

Staff ReporterNation, USA 0

The government shutdown is affecting military families stationed overseas, with teachers and support staff facing financial strain as they continue to work without pay.

As the government shutdown continues, its repercussions are being felt far beyond the confines of Washington, D.C. Military families stationed around the globe are experiencing the effects firsthand, particularly those working in educational roles at U.S. bases.

Donna Irwin, a substitute teacher at a naval base in Italy, has shared her concerns about the situation. “It has been absolutely terrible to watch, and the morale at the school is low,” she stated, highlighting the emotional toll the shutdown has taken on educators and students alike.

The Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) oversees 161 schools across 11 countries, seven states, and two territories, serving nearly 900,000 military-connected children. Of these, approximately 67,000 are enrolled in DoDEA schools, supported by over 14,000 employees. The ongoing shutdown has left many of these educators and staff working without pay, creating a challenging environment.

Jessica Tackaberry, DoDEA’s communications operations chief, addressed the situation in a statement to Fox News, emphasizing the organization’s commitment to providing a world-class education. She acknowledged the difficulties faced by dedicated educators and staff during this period of uncertainty, assuring that DoDEA is closely monitoring the situation and will continue to offer guidance and support as needed.

Despite the challenges, Irwin considers herself fortunate that her husband, a sailor, is still receiving a paycheck. However, the couple is feeling the financial strain as half of their income is on hold. Irwin noted that even when the government reopens, it may take time for repayment to occur.

“Especially out here, you feel forgotten because we are here to support that mission — as DoD contractors, as spouses and family members of the service members,” she explained. “These bases, these installations — they really don’t function without us, without our vital jobs and our support.”

For Americans living abroad, the situation is particularly unique. Many are restricted from taking second jobs off base due to contract agreements, and the distance from family adds to the stress of the shutdown. Some individuals are struggling to explain to European landlords why they cannot pay rent or utility bills due to the lack of paychecks.

<p”We oftentimes forget about all those little auto-pay things we have — everything from streaming services to healthcare needs,” Irwin said. “They’re having to do these deep dives into their bank accounts and cancel all of these, you know, car insurance, your vehicle.”

Despite the financial difficulties, educators remain committed to their students. Irwin noted that the mission continues, even if it means personally covering costs for snacks and school supplies. Working in a special education classroom, she teaches essential life skills such as cooking and cleaning.

“I have no budget for any of that in my current classroom, so I’ve been having to go to the commissary myself and make do, trying to buy things that I can’t afford right now for these students who desperately need those life skills,” Irwin explained. “I think the saddest thing for me is watching my students come in, and they don’t fully understand everything that’s happening with the government and with politics. To see them worried about, ‘Am I going to have a meal tomorrow? Am I going to have a meal today?'”

The ongoing government shutdown continues to create uncertainty and hardship for military families and educators stationed overseas, highlighting the broader implications of political stalemates on those serving the nation abroad.

Source: Original article

New York Mayoral Race: Could an Indian-American Muslim Candidate Win?

Staff ReporterElection, Nation, Politics 0

Queens Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani is making history as he campaigns to become New York City’s first South Asian, Indian American, and Muslim mayor, challenging political norms and energizing voters.

In the race for New York City mayor, Queens Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani has emerged as a formidable candidate, challenging traditional political norms and energizing a disillusioned electorate. His candidacy has become a significant focal point for many, with the potential outcome seen as a litmus test for the Democratic Party.

Mamdani, a 34-year-old Indian American, is the son of renowned academic Mahmood Mamdani and Oscar-nominated filmmaker Mira Nair. His candidacy is noteworthy not only for its historical implications but also for the way it reflects the evolving dynamics within the Democratic Party.

Political analysts have noted that while New York’s mayoral race may not serve as a national bellwether, Mamdani’s campaign is viewed through a lens that could influence perceptions of the Democratic Party. This perspective underscores the significance of his candidacy, marking a potential shift in the party’s direction.

Support for Mamdani appears to be growing, with some supporters coining the term “Mamdani Democrats” to describe a new wave of unapologetically progressive voters. Early voting trends indicate that he has a substantial lead as election day approaches on November 4. According to the final Emerson College poll, Mamdani holds a 25-point lead over his closest competitor, former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, with 50% of the vote. He also leads his Republican rival, Curtis Sliwa, by 29%.

Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling, noted that Mamdani’s support has increased by seven percentage points since last month, while Cuomo’s support has declined. The poll revealed that Mamdani has built a diverse coalition, particularly among Black voters, where his support surged from 50% to 71%. Among younger voters, 69% support him, compared to 37% of those over 50.

If these polling trends hold, Mamdani would make history as New York’s first Indian American, South Asian, and Muslim mayor. However, the implications of his potential victory extend beyond the city. Observers suggest that a win for Mamdani could influence the Democratic Party’s national strategy, particularly as it seeks to appeal to moderate independent voters disillusioned with the Republican Party.

The Republican Party, especially its MAGA base, is closely watching the election. A victory for Mamdani could be leveraged to portray the Democratic Party as overly progressive, which could impact their strategy for the upcoming 2026 mid-term elections. This dynamic highlights the importance of Mamdani’s candidacy in the broader political landscape.

While Mamdani’s left-of-center positions may pose challenges for the Democratic Party nationally, his campaign has resonated with many voters who are concerned about the affordability of living in New York. His proposals, which include freezing rent increases on rent-stabilized housing and making public transportation free, may face scrutiny regarding their feasibility on a national scale.

Despite the potential hurdles, Mamdani’s rise in the political arena has been described as a blockbuster moment for the season. His campaign reflects a growing movement within the Democratic Party, one that seeks to address the pressing issues facing urban voters.

As the election approaches, the outcome remains uncertain, but Mamdani’s candidacy has undoubtedly sparked conversations about the future direction of the Democratic Party and its ability to connect with a diverse electorate.

Source: Original article

Sanders Criticizes Eight Senate Democrats for Government Funding Vote

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Sen. Bernie Sanders criticized eight Senate Democrats for voting with Republicans on a continuing resolution, labeling it a harmful decision for working families.

Senator Bernie Sanders, an Independent from Vermont, has publicly condemned eight Senate Democrats who sided with Republicans in a recent procedural vote to advance a continuing resolution in the U.S. Senate. In a video posted to his X account, Sanders described the decision as “a very, very bad vote.”

During the vote, which took place on Sunday, Sanders expressed his disapproval, stating, “Tonight, 8 Democrats voted with the Republicans to allow them to go forward on this continuing resolution. And to my mind, this was a very, very bad vote.”

The continuing resolution was intended to provide temporary funding for the federal government and prevent a shutdown. However, Sanders argued that it included provisions that could lead to increased healthcare premiums, potential cuts to Medicaid, and tax benefits favoring high-income earners.

According to Sanders, the measure threatens to “raise healthcare premiums for over 20 million Americans by doubling, and in some cases tripling or quadrupling them.” He emphasized the burden this would place on families already struggling with high healthcare costs, stating, “People can’t afford that when we are already paying the highest prices in the world for healthcare.”

Sanders further criticized the resolution for potentially jeopardizing Medicaid coverage for 15 million individuals, warning that this could result in approximately 50,000 preventable deaths each year. “All of that was done to give a trillion dollars in tax breaks to the 1%,” he added.

Reflecting on the recent elections, Sanders noted, “As everybody knows, just on Tuesday, we had an election all over this country. And what the election showed is that the American people wanted us to stand up to Trumpism — to his war against working-class people, to his authoritarianism. That is what the American people wanted. But tonight, that is not what happened.”

In his video, Sanders framed the procedural vote as more than just a measure to keep the government operational; he viewed it as indicative of a broader policy direction that undermines healthcare protections and the interests of working-class Americans. “So we’ve got to go forward, do the best that we can to ensure and protect working-class people, to make sure that the United States not only does not throw people off of healthcare, but ends the absurdity of being the only major country on earth that doesn’t guarantee healthcare to all people,” he asserted. “We have a lot of work to do, but to be honest with you, tonight was not a good night.”

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has indicated that if the enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies established under the American Rescue Plan are allowed to expire, millions of Americans could face significantly higher marketplace premiums. A 2023 CBO analysis highlighted that the expiration of these expanded subsidies would lead to increased out-of-pocket costs for enrollees in ACA marketplaces.

Additionally, studies referenced by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), which Sanders chairs, have estimated that substantial cuts to Medicaid could result in tens of thousands of preventable deaths annually. A 2023 HELP Committee report on Sanders’ website cited peer-reviewed research published in Health Affairs and The Lancet Public Health, which found that losing Medicaid coverage is associated with higher mortality rates due to reduced access to preventive and emergency care.

Supporting this alarming trend, a letter from researchers at the Yale School of Public Health and the University of Pennsylvania’s Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics warned that proposed federal healthcare cuts could lead to over 51,000 preventable deaths each year.

Sanders’ remarks reflect his long-standing opposition to Republican budget proposals, which he argues disproportionately benefit the wealthy at the expense of working Americans. His comments have been consistently echoed in press releases on his official website since March of this year.

Source: Original article

Election 2025: South Asian-Origin Leaders Prepare for Political Contests

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Last week, candidates of South Asian origin achieved historic electoral victories across the United States, marking a significant step in enhancing democratic representation.

In a remarkable turn of events, political contenders of South Asian descent made history last week by securing elected positions across the United States. Their victories not only reflect the growing diversity within American politics but also signify a commitment to breaking barriers and strengthening democracy through public service.

These newly elected officials represent a wide array of backgrounds and experiences, showcasing the rich tapestry of South Asian culture and its increasing influence in the political landscape. As they step into their roles, these leaders are poised to address critical issues affecting their communities and the nation at large.

Their success is a testament to the hard work and dedication of countless individuals who have paved the way for greater representation in government. By engaging with their constituents and advocating for policies that resonate with the needs of diverse populations, these leaders are set to make a lasting impact.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the presence of South Asian leaders in office serves as an inspiration for future generations. Their achievements highlight the importance of inclusivity and representation in fostering a vibrant democracy.

With their election victories, these leaders are not only breaking new ground but also reinforcing the idea that public service is a powerful avenue for change. Their commitment to serving their communities will undoubtedly contribute to a more equitable society.

As we look ahead to the future, the significance of these elections cannot be overstated. The rise of leaders of South Asian origin marks a pivotal moment in American politics, one that promises to enrich the democratic process and empower underrepresented voices.

According to India Currents, the impact of these elections will be felt for years to come, as these leaders work to create a more inclusive and representative government.

Source: Original article

Vance Motivates Marines on 250th Birthday: ‘Defeat the Enemy and Return Safely’

Staff ReporterNation, Politics, USA 0

Vice President JD Vance celebrated the Marine Corps’ 250th birthday in Washington, D.C., emphasizing military strength and support for service members during a heartfelt address.

Vice President JD Vance took center stage at the Marine Corps’ 250th Birthday Ball in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, greeting a crowd of Marines in their dress blues with an enthusiastic, “How we doing, Marines?” His warm welcome was met with a resounding cheer from the audience, setting the tone for a night of celebration and reflection.

“It’s so great to be here to celebrate 250 years of the United States Marine Corps,” Vance declared, prompting loud applause from the attendees. His address coincided with the start of Veterans Day weekend, highlighting the White House’s commitment to military strength and service.

As a proud Marine veteran himself, Vance received a standing ovation when he reminded the crowd that he is “the very first vice president of the United States to have been a United States Marine.” He shared personal anecdotes from his time in the service, recalling his experience as a 19-year-old recruit on the yellow footprints of Parris Island, South Carolina.

“The Marine Corps has kept me honest,” Vance reflected. “It gave me great training, it gave me a sense of purpose, and it gave me lifelong friends.” He expressed gratitude for the lessons learned during his service, stating, “The Marine Corps has done more for me than I can possibly repay.” He pledged to honor the Marine Corps throughout his tenure as vice president.

In a light-hearted moment, Vance recounted a humorous encounter with a 99-year-old Iwo Jima veteran he had met earlier that evening. The veteran playfully teased him about his beard, leading Vance to quip, “I’m the vice president of the United States, and this guy is busting my b—- for having a beard.” This anecdote resonated with the audience, reinforcing the camaraderie and honesty that defines the Marine Corps.

Throughout his remarks, Vance paid tribute to Marines of all generations, from the youngest lance corporals born in 2006 to the veterans of Iwo Jima. He expressed pride in each Marine, vowing, “We’re going to keep on winning America’s wars for the next 250 years.” His commitment to supporting service members was evident as he promised that America’s leaders would never again send troops into harm’s way without a clear mission and adequate support.

“When we send you off to fight our nation’s battles, we will do it with full confidence,” Vance assured the audience. “We will give you the knowledge and the tools you need to win, and we will make it clear that your job is to kick the enemy’s a– and come home safely.”

Vance also acknowledged the evolving nature of warfare in the age of advanced technology. “Let’s be honest,” he said, “the battlefield has changed in an incredible and profound way… but I happen to believe that the most important war-fighting technology is not artificial intelligence or anything on a computer. The most important war-fighting technology is a well-trained and well-armed United States Marine.”

As the evening drew to a close, the crowd rose for a final toast. Vance took a moment to reflect on the impact the Marine Corps has had on his life. “The Marine Corps has done a lot for me,” he said. “It’s done more for me than I can possibly repay.” Raising his glass, he concluded, “I will fight every single day to make sure that the next 250 years are just as damn proud as the first 250. Happy Birthday, Marines.” The ballroom erupted in thunderous applause, with a sea of raised glasses celebrating the legacy of the Marine Corps.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Second Term Could Bring Major Immigration Overhaul

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Politics 0

New report reveals that the Trump administration’s recent immigration policies threaten the foundations of American democracy through extreme measures and a radical overhaul of the immigration system.

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 23, 2025 — A special report released today provides a comprehensive analysis of the Trump administration’s first six months back in office, highlighting a significant transformation of the U.S. immigration system that poses a serious threat to the foundations of American democracy. While some voters may have endorsed a tougher stance on immigration during the election, the report illustrates how the administration’s extreme actions extend far beyond mere policy changes; they undermine the rule of law itself.

The report, titled Mass Deportation: Analyzing the Trump Administration’s Attacks on Immigrants, Democracy, and America, was published on July 23 by the American Immigration Council. It details a radical, multi-faceted assault on immigrants and the immigration system.

Among the administration’s actions are severe restrictions on who can enter the United States, the removal of legal protections for those already residing in the country, and an unprecedented increase in enforcement measures. In the process, the Trump administration has dismantled long-standing legal safeguards, disregarded the authority of Congress and the courts, and weaponized government resources against immigrants and dissenters alike.

“This isn’t just a hardline immigration agenda,” said Nayna Gupta, policy director at the American Immigration Council and co-author of the report. “It’s a wholesale effort to use immigrants and the U.S. immigration system to attack core tenets of our democracy and exercise unchecked executive power to realign the American government around exclusion and fear.”

The report outlines several key findings that underscore the administration’s aggressive approach to immigration:

The end of asylum. The report states that asylum at the southern border is effectively non-existent. The administration has shut down the CBP One application without providing an alternative. Asylum-seekers who attempt to approach a port of entry are often turned away, and in some instances, those who win their cases remain detained indefinitely.

Demolishing the refugee program. The U.S. Refugee Admissions Program has been indefinitely suspended, with the exception of white South Africans who have been fast-tracked under questionable persecution claims. Tens of thousands of approved refugees are left stranded abroad.

Mass revocation of legal status. The administration has aggressively revoked humanitarian parole and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for over a million individuals within just six months, stripping them of work permits and forcing many into undocumented status.

Weaponizing bureaucracy. Legal immigration pathways are being obstructed by significant fee increases, processing freezes, and opaque barriers that make it nearly impossible for lawful applicants to obtain or maintain their status.

A maelstrom of fear and chaos. The administration’s aggressive enforcement tactics have instilled fear among immigrants of all legal statuses, leaving them anxious about their daily safety in the United States. Anyone can be targeted for arrest, detention, and deportation, regardless of their legal status, and these actions can occur in places such as churches, schools, and courthouses.

A radical reorganization of law enforcement resources. The Trump administration is establishing an unprecedented, cross-agency immigration operation that draws resources from various federal and state law enforcement agencies and the U.S. military, prioritizing immigration enforcement above all other public safety and law enforcement objectives.

Turbocharging an inhumane detention system. The “Big Beautiful Bill Act,” enacted in July, increases the budget for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention by 308 percent annually, setting the stage for a dramatic expansion of a detention system already criticized for its careless and cruel management, which has placed tens of thousands of immigrants in life-threatening conditions.

The report also includes powerful firsthand accounts from individuals affected by these policies. Ilia, a nonbinary Russian dissident, won their asylum case but remained in detention for over a year without a release date. Axel, a DACA recipient and youth leader, is leaving his job to return to school amid uncertainty regarding his legal status. Beatriz, an immigrant lawyer, has encountered cases that remind her of her own journey to the U.S., including a confused six-year-old who appeared in court without representation. Kaelyn is incurring debt to prevent her partner from being deported to El Salvador’s megaprison under the Alien Enemies Act.

The report warns that while some policies may change due to legal challenges, the administration’s broader agenda remains clear: to permanently redefine who belongs in America and how power is wielded by the federal government.

“The administration’s policies are reshaping the immigration system in ways that are unfair, unlawful, and out of step with core American values,” said Dara Lind, senior fellow at the Council and co-author of the report. “We’re seeing real harm to families, communities, and the rule of law, and the public deserves to understand what’s at stake.”

The full report is available for review, along with interviews featuring experts and individuals impacted by these policies.

Source: Original article

Connecticut Man Loses Life Savings in Cryptocurrency Scam

Staff ReporterBusiness, Economy, Politics 0

Joe A. from Shelton, Connecticut, lost $228,000 to a cryptocurrency investment scam, illustrating the growing threat of online fraud targeting vulnerable individuals.

Joe A., a resident of Shelton, Connecticut, recently fell victim to a cryptocurrency investment scam that cost him his life savings of $228,000. After experiencing a divorce, Joe received a text message about an investment opportunity that he believed could help him rebuild his finances. Unfortunately, this decision led him down a path of deception and loss.

The message came from a company calling itself “ZAP Solutions,” which promised astonishing returns on investment. Joe was enticed by the prospect of turning a $30,000 investment into $368,000. The offer seemed legitimate and professional, which is a common tactic used by scammers to gain the trust of their victims.

As Joe engaged further with the scammers, he was lured into a web of deceit. Each “short-term investment” required additional wire transfers, leading him to deplete his entire savings, including his 401(k) and IRA. The moment he was locked out of his account, panic set in. The scammers demanded more money to “reactivate” it, and by the end of the ordeal, Joe had lost everything.

His mother, Carol, expressed her devastation upon learning of her son’s loss. “I was shocked,” she said. “He showed us the screenshots, the messages. He emptied everything.” In the aftermath, Joe and his family filed a police report and contacted the FBI, but local authorities informed them that recovery of the lost funds was highly unlikely. “They told us there’s no way to get it back,” Carol recounted. “These cyberstalkers move the money too fast.”

Joe’s experience is not an isolated incident. According to the FBI, cybercriminals have stolen over $50 billion from Americans in the past five years. Scammers often target individuals who are hopeful, lonely, or undergoing significant life changes, exploiting their vulnerabilities.

“If it seems too good to be true, it probably is,” Joe advised, a lesson that resonates with many who have fallen prey to similar scams. Awareness and vigilance are crucial in protecting oneself from these fraudulent schemes.

To safeguard against such scams, individuals should take proactive measures. It is essential to verify any investment opportunity before transferring money. This can be done by researching the company through official government or financial websites, such as the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure database or FINRA’s BrokerCheck. Reading reviews, confirming licenses, and searching for scam alerts online can also provide valuable insights.

When receiving unsolicited messages promising high returns, it is vital to pause and evaluate the situation. Legitimate firms do not cold-contact individuals with investment offers. Deleting suspicious messages and avoiding clicking on links from unknown sources can help prevent falling victim to scams.

Installing and regularly updating strong antivirus software on all devices is another critical step in protecting personal information. This software can block phishing attempts, malicious downloads, and fake investment platforms designed to steal sensitive data.

Scammers often use domains that closely resemble legitimate ones. Therefore, it is important to double-check for misspellings, extra letters, or unusual web extensions. If there is any doubt, searching for the official company site separately in a browser is advisable.

Once money is wired to a scammer, recovery is nearly impossible. Individuals should never send money to someone they have only met online, even if the person claims to represent a reputable company. Confirming payment details through verified sources is crucial.

Before making significant investments, seeking a second opinion from a licensed financial advisor can help identify red flags and unrealistic promises that may be overlooked. Additionally, protecting personal information through data removal or privacy services can reduce the likelihood of being targeted by scammers.

Identity theft protection services can further enhance security by monitoring personal information and alerting individuals to suspicious activity. These services can help prevent unauthorized use of personal data, such as Social Security numbers and bank account information.

If someone believes they have been targeted or scammed, it is important to act quickly. Contacting local law enforcement, notifying banks, and filing a report with the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) can help limit further losses and assist investigators in tracing the fraud.

Joe’s story serves as a painful yet powerful reminder of the risks associated with online investments. By sharing his experience, he hopes to prevent others from suffering similar losses. Online scams thrive in silence, but by raising awareness and encouraging vigilance, individuals can protect themselves from becoming victims.

Have you ever received an investment offer that seemed too good to be true? Share your experiences with us at Cyberguy.com.

Source: Original article

Sholay: A Timeless Classic in Indian Cinema’s Legacy

Staff ReporterBollywood, Cinema, Election 0

Sholay, the iconic Bollywood film that transformed the industry, celebrates its 50th anniversary this year, leaving an indelible mark on cinema and popular culture.

Sholay, a film that forever changed the Bollywood landscape, turned 50 this year. The unforgettable characters—Jai, Veeru, Thakur, Basanti, and the notorious Gabbar Singh—have become ingrained in the cultural psyche. The film marked a significant shift in Indian cinema, creating a clear divide between the eras of pre-Sholay and post-Sholay. Before its release, popular film music was primarily limited to individual songs. However, Sholay revolutionized this by releasing not only the songs but the entire film’s soundtrack on vinyl records and cassettes, leading to chart-topping hits and iconic dialogues that remain etched in our memories.

For those fortunate enough to have experienced Sholay in theaters back in 1975, it was not just a movie; it was an unforgettable experience. Many of us were too young to appreciate the Western influences that inspired the film, such as Sergio Leone’s Once Upon a Time in the West and Akira Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai. Yet, the magic of Sholay transcends these influences. Director Ramesh Sippy crafted a unique narrative that stands as a remarkable achievement in filmmaking.

Everyone who grew up in the 1970s has a personal Sholay memory. For instance, I recall my once-fearless cousin developing nightmares about Gabbar Singh, played by Amjad Khan. I, on the other hand, found myself untroubled, allowing me to tease her with the dismissive remark, “It’s just a movie, silly!” But is it merely a movie? No, it is magic; it is legend. The essence of Sholay’s magic is difficult to articulate, yet it is palpable. Upon re-watching the film recently, I was struck by the brilliance of its editing—each scene transitions seamlessly at just the right moment. The romance avoids becoming overly sentimental, the comedy remains fresh and engaging, and the violence is suggested rather than explicit.

My renewed interest in dance and the classical art of Nritya and Abhinaya led me to connect Sholay with the concept of navarasa, or the nine primary emotions in Indian classical dance. Unsurprisingly, Sholay encapsulates all nine. The film’s central revenge narrative is primarily driven by raudra ras (fury), as Thakur, portrayed by Sanjeev Kumar, grapples with his simmering rage against Gabbar Singh, who embodies vibhatsa (disgust). Gabbar’s unkempt appearance and menacing demeanor evoke fear and revulsion, particularly during the harrowing massacre of Thakur’s family, which instills terror in the audience. His chilling laughter and infamous line, “yeh haath hamein de de Thakur,” resonate long after the film ends.

The film also evokes adbhut (wonder) when the armless Thakur enlists the help of two outlaws to confront the seemingly invincible Gabbar. This leads to veer ras (heroism) as the daring duo, Jai, played by Amitabh Bachchan, and Veeru, portrayed by Dharmendra, accept the challenge armed only with their courage and cunning.

Sholay would have been a heavy watch without the infusion of shringar (love and beauty) brought to life by the vivacious Basanti, played by Hema Malini, and Veeru’s relentless pursuit of her affections. Veeru’s wooing is humorously supported by Jai, who persuades Basanti’s incredulous mausi to consider his friend as a suitor. The impeccable comic timing of Amitabh and Dharmendra, alongside memorable performances by Asrani as the jailer and Jagdeep as Soorma Bhopali, adds layers of hasya ras (laughter) to the narrative.

The film also skillfully incorporates shant and karun ras (peace and compassion), elevating it beyond a typical revenge tale. The unspoken tenderness between Jai and Radha, played by Jaya Bhaduri, is woven into the fabric of the story. A poignant moment occurs when Radha lights lanterns as dusk falls, while Jai plays the harmonica, creating an atmosphere of wistful affection. The tragic irony of Jai’s death just as Radha begins to dream again adds depth to the narrative.

While the navarasas offer a framework for understanding Sholay’s magic, they do not fully capture its essence. The film’s extraordinary blend of talent, storytelling, and music creates an experience that is truly magical. So, let’s embrace that magic and watch Sholay again. For those who have only heard about it from their parents, experiencing it together can illuminate the cherished memories that the film evokes.

Source: Original article

Iran-Directed Assassination Plot Against Israel’s Ambassador to Mexico Thwarted

Staff ReporterPolitics, Economy 0

A plot directed by Iran to assassinate Israel’s ambassador to Mexico has been thwarted, according to officials.

Officials announced on Friday that a plot orchestrated by a terrorist network linked to Iran aimed at attacking Israel’s ambassador in Mexico has been successfully neutralized.

The alleged assassination attempt, reportedly orchestrated by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, was said to have begun late last year. However, U.S. officials confirmed that the threat was contained and no longer poses a risk.

In a statement to Fox News, Israel’s foreign ministry expressed gratitude towards the security and law enforcement agencies in Mexico for their role in thwarting the plot. “We thank the security and law enforcement services in Mexico for thwarting a terrorist network directed by Iran that sought to attack Israel’s ambassador in Mexico,” the ministry stated.

The Israeli security and intelligence community emphasized its commitment to collaborating with global security agencies to counter threats posed by Iran and its proxies against Israeli and Jewish targets worldwide.

A U.S. official highlighted the significance of the thwarted plot, noting, “This is just the latest in a long history of Iran’s global lethal targeting of diplomats, journalists, dissidents, and anyone who disagrees with them.” The official added that this ongoing threat should concern every nation where Iran maintains a presence.

Details surrounding the plot remain sparse. However, security services in both Britain and Sweden had previously warned that Iran was increasingly relying on criminal proxies to execute attacks. Reports indicate that Britain has disrupted approximately 20 Iranian-linked plots since 2022.

As the situation develops, the international community continues to monitor Iran’s activities closely, particularly in light of its history of targeting individuals who oppose its regime.

Source: Original article

Federal Judge Orders Trump to Disburse SNAP Benefits by Friday

Staff ReporterHealth, Nation 0

A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to fully fund SNAP benefits for November, emphasizing the urgent need to address food insecurity amid ongoing political gridlock.

A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration regarding the funding of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, ordering that full payments be made by Friday. This decision comes in light of the ongoing U.S. government shutdown, which has left millions of Americans facing food insecurity.

During a hearing in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island on Thursday, Judge Jack McConnell expressed concern over the impact of partial funding on the 42 million Americans who rely on SNAP. “People have gone without for too long,” he stated, underscoring the urgency of the situation.

Judge McConnell’s order requires the administration to utilize both a congressionally authorized contingency fund and additional resources, known as Section 32 funds, which the administration had previously declined to access. “The evidence shows that people will go hungry, food pantries will be overburdened, and needless suffering will occur” if SNAP is not fully funded, he added.

The SNAP program, which supports over 40 million Americans, has faced significant disruptions due to the federal government shutdown that began in October. The U.S. Department of Agriculture had initially announced that new SNAP benefits would not be issued starting November 1, 2025, leaving many low-income households uncertain about their access to food assistance. While existing benefits remained usable, the threat of halted future payments created immediate economic stress for vulnerable populations.

In response to the crisis, two federal court rulings mandated that the administration utilize contingency funds or other measures to ensure at least partial disbursements, preventing a complete cessation of benefits. This situation has highlighted the critical dependence of SNAP recipients on timely government funding, as well as the exacerbation of food insecurity during government shutdowns.

Judge McConnell pointed out in his written order that more than half of SNAP recipients are children, seniors, and veterans. “While the President of the United States professes a commitment to helping those it serves, the government’s actions tell a different story,” he wrote, emphasizing the disconnect between political rhetoric and the reality faced by many Americans.

On Monday, the Trump administration informed Judge McConnell that it would provide only 50 percent of the benefits by utilizing the contingency fund, while ruling out the use of at least $4 billion from the Child Nutrition Program and other funding sources. This decision raises questions about the balance of power, as courts increasingly step in to enforce social protections when administrative decisions threaten public well-being.

For policymakers, this episode serves as a cautionary tale, illustrating that ensuring food security requires not only adequate funding but also resilient systems capable of withstanding political stalemates. For the public, it highlights the tangible consequences of government gridlock, demonstrating how delays in decision-making can lead to real hardship for millions of individuals and families.

Ultimately, the 2025 SNAP case serves as a critical reminder that social safety nets are only as strong as the commitment of government institutions to maintain them consistently, even amid political uncertainty.

Source: Original article

Prolonged Government Shutdown Drives U.S. Consumer Sentiment to Historic Lows

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Consumer confidence in the U.S. has fallen to its lowest level in over three years, driven by fears of a prolonged government shutdown and ongoing political gridlock.

Concerns about a potential government shutdown have significantly impacted consumer confidence in the United States, bringing it to its weakest point in over three years. A recent report from the University of Michigan, released on Friday, reveals that growing uncertainty regarding the economy and political stalemate in Washington has shaken public sentiment, pushing it close to one of the lowest readings ever recorded in the survey’s history.

The University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index dropped sharply to 50.3 in November, reflecting a 6.2% decline from the previous month and nearly 30% lower than the same period last year. This figure fell well below economists’ expectations of 53.0, indicating a significant decline in public confidence. The last time sentiment reached such low levels was in mid-2022, during a period of soaring inflation that marked its highest level in four decades. This decline underscores renewed anxieties about the nation’s economic trajectory.

Joanne Hsu, the survey director, noted that the ongoing political deadlock in Washington has become the primary factor affecting consumers’ outlook, overshadowing any optimism that might have stemmed from the recent record-breaking performance of the stock market. “With the federal government shutdown dragging on for over a month, consumers are now expressing worries about potential negative consequences for the economy,” Hsu stated. “This month’s decline in sentiment was widespread throughout the population, seen across age, income, and political affiliation.”

Other key indicators from the survey reflected a similarly pessimistic outlook. The index tracking current economic conditions fell to 52.3, marking an almost 11% drop from the previous month as households reported feeling increased pressure from rising costs and slowing economic activity. Meanwhile, the measure of consumer expectations for the future slipped to 49.0, down 2.6%. Compared to a year ago, both figures have experienced sharp declines, with current conditions down more than 18% and future outlooks plunging over 36%, highlighting a deepening sense of financial insecurity among Americans.

Despite the overall decline in sentiment, inflation expectations remained relatively stable, providing a modest point of relief. The survey indicated that while consumers continue to feel the impact of higher prices, their long-term outlook on inflation has eased slightly, suggesting a growing belief that price pressures may gradually subside in the coming months.

In the short term, consumers now expect inflation to rise modestly, with the one-year outlook increasing to 4.7%. However, confidence in the longer-term view appears to be improving, as the five-year inflation expectation dipped to 3.6%, a decline of 0.3 percentage points. This suggests that while near-term price concerns persist, many Americans believe inflation will gradually cool over the next few years.

As federal agencies halt most data collection and reporting during the shutdown, private surveys like the University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment report have gained increased importance. In the absence of regular government updates, these independent indicators are becoming vital tools for gauging how Americans perceive the economy and how broader trends in spending, confidence, and inflation may be shifting in real time.

The survey also revealed a clear divide along income and wealth lines. While overall confidence declined, those with substantial stock market investments appeared more optimistic, buoyed by recent market gains. Hsu noted that sentiment among households with the highest levels of stock ownership actually rose by 11%, highlighting how financial assets continue to cushion wealthier Americans from the broader economic anxieties affecting the rest of the population.

As the government shutdown continues, the implications for consumer sentiment and economic stability remain uncertain. The evolving situation will likely keep Americans on edge as they navigate the complexities of both their personal finances and the national economic landscape.

Source: Original article

Lawmakers Reach Agreement, Signaling Possible End to Government Shutdown

Staff ReporterNation, Politics 0

The ongoing government shutdown, now in its 37th day, sees Senate Republicans proposing a new funding plan as bipartisan lawmakers seek a compromise amid rising concerns for federal workers.

The record-breaking government shutdown has entered its 37th day, prompting Senate Republicans to propose a new funding plan. Bipartisan lawmakers are now seeking a compromise as concerns grow over the impact on federal workers and essential services.

“Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., echoing Winston Churchill’s famous words.

While the proposal marks a significant step, it is important to note that it is not a formal agreement but rather an attempt to initiate discussions. Lawmakers from both parties are increasingly anxious about the shutdown’s effects, particularly on aviation safety and the potential disruption of emergency food benefits like SNAP.

Despite the urgency, finding common ground remains a challenge. “There seems to be some indication of a thaw,” Blumenthal noted, highlighting a cautious optimism among lawmakers.

Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., expressed hope that progress could be made soon, stating, “I’m optimistic that we should get something done this week. I think there’s a path forward here.”

On Tuesday, Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., suggested that a Senate vote could occur as early as Thursday, although he tempered his expectations by admitting, “I’m just making assumptions.”

The current shutdown, which has persisted since October 1, has left many uncertain about its resolution. Mullin later recalibrated his earlier statements, indicating that bipartisan discussions were ongoing but complicated by conflicting demands from different factions within Congress.

Republicans have acknowledged that the interim spending bill passed by the House in September is no longer viable. Even if the Senate were to align with the House, that legislation would only fund the government through November 21, potentially leading to another shutdown.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., emphasized the need for a longer temporary spending bill, suggesting a timeline extending through late January. “We’ve lost five weeks. So the November 21 deadline no longer makes a lot of sense,” he stated.

However, any new proposal will require bipartisan support to overcome a filibuster. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., remained noncommittal when asked about potential Democratic support following a lengthy caucus meeting. “We had a very good caucus and we’re exploring all the options,” he replied.

Despite ongoing discussions, uncertainty looms over what might garner Democratic votes, particularly as Republicans appear steadfast in their positions. “It seems they’re pretty dug in and they’re okay, screwing people over on their healthcare,” remarked Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz.

Past decisions by Schumer to collaborate with Republicans have left some House Democrats wary of future agreements. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., acknowledged this skepticism but reiterated a commitment to evaluate any bipartisan proposals in good faith.

As lawmakers grapple with the shutdown, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., noted the unexpected duration of the crisis, stating, “I don’t think any of us expected that it would drag on this long.”

On Thursday, Senate Republicans unveiled a new plan aimed at ending the shutdown, which would fund the Department of Veterans Affairs, military construction projects, and the Department of Agriculture until September 30, 2026. A separate short-term spending bill would cover the rest of the government until late January.

However, the likelihood of Democratic cooperation remains uncertain. Johnson expressed concern, saying, “I’m less optimistic this morning than I was yesterday,” indicating that Schumer may have instructed Democrats to hold firm against the proposal.

Progressives within the Democratic Party are urging Schumer to maintain a strong stance, especially after previous compromises that did not yield favorable outcomes. Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., emphasized the need for a win, stating, “He’s got to keep doing it, and we’ve got to deliver a win because we can’t have what happened in the spring happen again.”

Democrats are also pushing for guarantees related to healthcare subsidies, a key demand as they seek to offset rising costs associated with the Affordable Care Act. With the House not voting since September 19, some members are resorting to creative tactics to draw attention to the shutdown’s impact.

Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Penn., interrupted a press conference by House Republican leadership to voice her concerns, while Rep. Yassamin Ansari, D-Ariz., set up a table outside the speaker’s office to discuss healthcare issues, highlighting the plight of air traffic controllers working without pay.

As aviation safety concerns mount, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., warned, “All it takes is one little accident. And if people die? So air travel is nothing to mess around with.”

Even if the Senate votes on a new proposal this week, many remain skeptical about an immediate resolution. Thune noted the challenges ahead, stating, “My hopes and expectations are always that we’re going to have enough Democrats to actually proceed. But I don’t know. We’ll see.”

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., offered a more pessimistic outlook, predicting that the shutdown could last at least another week, if not longer. “We’re at least seven days and more likely ten and very possibly two weeks away from opening up at best,” he said.

As lawmakers continue to navigate this complex situation, the path to resolving the government shutdown remains fraught with challenges. While there are efforts underway to find a solution, the end of this saga is still not in sight.

Source: Original article

Violent Mob Disrupts Pro-Israel Gathering in Toronto After Mayor’s Remarks

Staff ReporterConflict, Nation, Politics 0

A pro-Israel event in Toronto was violently disrupted by anti-Israel activists, raising concerns about escalating tensions in the city following controversial remarks by the mayor.

A pro-Israel gathering in Toronto descended into chaos on Wednesday when anti-Israel activists stormed a private venue, injuring one speaker and causing significant property damage. This incident occurred just days after Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow faced backlash for her comments regarding “the genocide in Gaza,” remarks that Jewish organizations warned could exacerbate tensions in the city.

The event was organized by the student group Students Supporting Israel at Toronto Metropolitan University and featured Israeli military veterans. Due to safety concerns, the event was relocated at the last minute. Despite efforts to keep the venue secret, approximately 40 masked protesters managed to find the location and force their way inside, breaking glass and attacking attendees.

Israeli-American speaker Jonathan Karten, who splits his time between Israel and New York, was present to discuss his uncle, Sharon Edri, an Israeli soldier who was kidnapped and murdered by Hamas in 1996. “As soon as we got there, we were attacked by roughly forty protesters—terrorists, whatever you want to call them,” Karten told Fox News Digital. “Five managed to get into the main room. One had a drill bit. A guy broke through the glass door, I got knocked in the face, and we barricaded ourselves with tables and chairs until police came.”

Karten noted that the protesters appeared to have prior knowledge of the event’s location. “They were waiting for us before we even started speaking,” he said. “It’s not something I assumed would happen in a civilian population in a Western country.”

The violent disruption occurred less than a week after Mayor Chow stated during an event that “the genocide in Gaza impacts us all.” Her comments sparked immediate outrage from Jewish organizations, with Michael Levitt, CEO of the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center, condemning the language as “shocking and dangerous.” He urged Chow to apologize and clarify that Israel is not committing genocide, asserting that such words “validate hate and normalize the harassment of Jews.”

According to a statement from the Toronto police, a group of protesters entered the private event without permission, damaged property, and instilled fear among attendees. One individual sustained injuries from broken glass during the altercation.

Police have arrested five individuals in connection with the incident, all of whom are scheduled to appear in court in January. A spokesperson for the Toronto police informed Fox News Digital that while antisemitic incidents remain the most frequently reported hate-motivated category in the city, they have seen a 41% decline compared to the previous year.

Despite his injuries, Karten expressed his determination to continue speaking on campuses. “We’re cautious, but not scared,” he stated. “We have to make sure Jewish and Israeli voices are heard without fear.”

Source: Original article

India Considers Potential Ban on U.S. Apps, Experts Warn

Staff ReporterIndia, Politics, USA 0

Harsh Goenka and Sridhar Vembu have raised concerns over a potential ban on U.S. tech platforms in India, urging a shift towards self-reliance in technology.

RPG Group Chairman Harsh Goenka has expressed alarm regarding reports that U.S. President Donald Trump may consider blocking India’s access to major American tech platforms, including X, Google, and Instagram. Goenka warned of the potential consequences of such a ban and encouraged users to explore alternative platforms.

In a post on the social media platform X, Goenka stated, “Imagine if Trump bans India from using US tech platforms—no X, Google, Instagram, Facebook, or ChatGPT. Frightening, no? Just think about the consequences seriously and what could be Plan B for us.”

Joining Goenka in his concerns, Zoho founder Sridhar Vembu emphasized the importance of addressing India’s reliance on foreign technology. He advocated for a National Mission for Tech Resilience to tackle the country’s deep-rooted dependence on external tech solutions.

Vembu commented, “I agree. And we have a lot more such tech dependency beyond the app level: OS, chips, fabs… it goes deeper and deeper. We need a 10-year ‘National Mission for Tech Resilience.’ It can be done.” His remarks come at a time when India is increasingly promoting its own homegrown digital ecosystem.

Platforms developed by Vembu’s company, such as Arrattai—positioned as a local alternative to WhatsApp—and Zoho Mail, which competes with Gmail, have recently gained popularity in India. This trend reflects a growing user interest in domestic tech solutions.

In support of India’s homegrown technology sector, Union Home Minister Amit Shah and several cabinet members have adopted Zoho Mail for official use, signaling the government’s endorsement of domestic digital platforms.

Building on the success of Arrattai, Zoho launched Vani on October 1, 2025. This intelligent visual collaboration platform is designed to transform how remote and hybrid teams plan, collaborate, and execute projects within a unified workspace, positioning it as a strong competitor to Google Workspace.

Goenka’s post has sparked a lively discussion on social media, with users debating the feasibility and potential of developing Indian alternatives to dominant global tech platforms. One user remarked, “Waiting for the day when US tech companies start worrying about attracting top talent from India. The day it happens we will have real independence. As you pointed out, this problem cannot be looked at in isolation. Supply chain dependencies are higher than automotive and pharma.”

Another user suggested, “A consortium of private companies can work for this. Help colleges, R&D labs, etc. A lot of youth would love to stay close to families, and with connectivity, help make it a reality.”

Conversely, some users expressed skepticism about the likelihood of a ban. One user stated, “I highly doubt this would ever happen, not in the next 10 years. Trump’s a businessman, not a fool to cut off America’s biggest tech market—India. India is the largest or second-largest market for nearly every U.S. tech giant. Tech independence is good, but this reasoning isn’t,” as quoted by Mint.

Indian leaders are clearly signaling a push toward self-reliance in the digital space, championing homegrown platforms like Zoho Mail, Arrattai, and Vani as viable alternatives to global giants. Meanwhile, users are actively engaging in the conversation online, with some expressing optimism about adopting domestic tech, while others debate its scalability and readiness.

Source: Original article

Snap and Perplexity AI Announce $400 Million Partnership Deal

Staff ReporterBusiness, Politics, Technology 0

Snap has announced a $400 million partnership with Perplexity AI, aiming to enhance user engagement through advanced search technology while exceeding third-quarter revenue expectations.

Snap Inc. has reported third-quarter revenue that surpassed Wall Street expectations, driven by robust advertising demand and the introduction of new AI-powered features. In a significant move, the company has partnered with Perplexity AI to integrate the startup’s advanced search technology into Snapchat, resulting in a 16% surge in Snap’s shares during after-hours trading.

As part of the agreement, Perplexity AI will invest $400 million in Snap over the next year, utilizing a combination of cash and equity. The partnership is anticipated to start contributing to Snap’s revenue in 2026, with plans to deliver verified, AI-generated answers directly within the Snapchat app.

“Perplexity will control the responses from their chatbot inside of Snapchat. So, we won’t be selling advertising against the Perplexity responses,” said Snap CEO Evan Spiegel.

This collaboration with Perplexity represents a strategic initiative for Snap as it seeks to solidify its position in a social media landscape increasingly dominated by major players like TikTok and Meta’s Facebook and Instagram. By incorporating advanced AI-driven search capabilities, Snap aims to enhance user engagement and attract more advertisers, an area where its competitors have traditionally excelled due to their extensive global reach and sophisticated advertising systems.

“Perplexity needs a way to build its profile among young consumers, and Snap needs an AI chat partner that will allow its users to stay engaged without leaving its app,” noted Max Willens, principal analyst at eMarketer.

In addition to its partnership with Perplexity, Snap has been intensifying its focus on direct-response advertising, which targets measurable user actions such as app installations, online purchases, or website visits. This strategy has become integral to Snap’s efforts to enhance its digital advertising business and provide clearer returns on investment for advertisers, especially as competition for ad dollars intensifies across major social media platforms.

Snap’s commitment to performance-driven advertising is yielding results. The company reported an 8% increase in direct-response ad revenue for the quarter, fueled by heightened demand for its “Pixel Purchase” and “App Purchase” optimization tools. These features are designed to help advertisers connect with users most likely to make a purchase, whether through a website or within an app, emphasizing Snap’s dedication to delivering more efficient and data-driven advertising solutions for businesses.

During the third quarter, Snap recorded a 10% year-over-year revenue increase, reaching $1.51 billion, which exceeded the analyst consensus estimate of $1.49 billion, according to LSEG data. The company also made strides in profitability, narrowing its net loss to $104 million compared to $153 million during the same period last year.

Snapchat’s global daily active users rose by 8% in the third quarter, reaching 477 million. However, the company has cautioned that user growth may decelerate in the upcoming quarter, attributing this to shifts in investment priorities, the implementation of age-verification measures, and potential challenges from evolving regulatory requirements that could impact engagement in certain markets.

Looking ahead, Snap has projected its fourth-quarter revenue to fall between $1.68 billion and $1.71 billion, a forecast that aligns closely with analyst expectations, which average around $1.69 billion, according to Reuters.

Source: Original article

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Revises Comments on AI Race with China

Staff ReporterPolitics, Technology 0

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has softened his earlier assertion that China will win the AI race, emphasizing the need for the U.S. to maintain its technological edge.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang appears to be backtracking on his previous comments regarding China’s position in the artificial intelligence (AI) race. In a recent interview with the Financial Times, Huang stated, “China is going to win the AI race.” However, shortly after this statement, Nvidia released a more tempered response from Huang on its official X account.

In the follow-up statement, Huang clarified, “As I have long said, China is nanoseconds behind America in AI. It’s vital that America wins by racing ahead and winning developers worldwide.” This shift in tone highlights the complexities surrounding the competitive landscape of AI technology.

During his interview with the Financial Times, Huang expressed concerns that the West, particularly the United States, is being hindered by “cynicism” and stringent regulations. He contrasted this with China’s approach, which includes energy subsidies aimed at reducing costs for local developers utilizing domestic chips.

Nvidia’s operations in China have faced significant challenges due to U.S. export-control regulations. In April 2025, the company announced that its H20 AI accelerator, intended for the Chinese market, would require a U.S. export license. This decision led to an estimated $5.5 billion in charges related to canceled orders, excess inventory, and purchase commitments. For the quarter ending April 27, 2025, Nvidia reported sales in China of approximately $4.6 billion, accounting for about 12 to 13 percent of its overall revenue.

By mid-2025, Nvidia indicated it would exclude China from its forward revenue and profit forecasts, reflecting the ongoing regulatory uncertainty and licensing limitations. Although export licenses were eventually granted under specific conditions, the company had not resumed shipments of H20 chips to China as of that time. The situation remains fraught with geopolitical and regulatory risks, leading Nvidia to treat China, despite its substantial market potential—estimated at around $50 billion in AI and data-center demand—as a constrained opportunity in its near-term strategy.

Huang has consistently maintained that the U.S. can remain at the forefront of the AI race by ensuring developers continue to rely on Nvidia’s leading AI chips. This argument has been part of his lobbying efforts against export restrictions affecting the company’s sales to China.

Nvidia’s experiences in China during 2025 illustrate the complexities of operating in high-stakes global AI markets, where technological leadership, regulatory policy, and geopolitical tensions intersect. Success in these markets hinges on strategic innovation and agility, as projected financial impacts and market potential are inherently uncertain.

The company’s approach underscores the importance of maintaining a long-term technological advantage through developer ecosystems, research, and innovation. This strategy can prove more critical than immediate market access, particularly in regions where regulations can sharply limit operations.

Even leading technology firms face uncertainty while navigating export controls, licensing requirements, and evolving policy landscapes. This reality highlights the broader fragility of global supply chains in advanced AI sectors.

Moreover, interpretations of the U.S.-China AI race often reflect corporate positioning rather than definitive predictions. This underscores the necessity of carefully framing public messaging while pursuing competitive advantages. Nvidia’s cautious strategy illustrates that high-potential markets can present both opportunities and risks.

To sustain innovation leadership, protect intellectual property, and ensure regulatory compliance will be essential for shaping the long-term trajectory of global AI competition. Overall, the events of 2025 demonstrate that success in AI is determined not only by market access but also by the ability to innovate strategically amid uncertainty.

Source: Original article

Zohran Mamdani Becomes New York’s First Indian-American Mayor

Staff ReporterNation, Politics, USA 0

Zohran Kwame Mamdani has made history as New York City’s first South Asian and Muslim mayor, emphasizing the importance of immigrant contributions to the city.

In a historic victory, Zohran Kwame Mamdani, 34, has been elected as New York City’s first mayor of South Asian descent and the first Muslim to hold the office. His election marks a significant milestone in the city’s diverse political landscape.

During his victory speech, Mamdani highlighted the foundational role of immigrants in shaping New York City, stating, “New York City was built by immigrants — and is now going to be led by one.” His remarks resonated with a city that prides itself on its multicultural heritage.

Mamdani’s campaign was characterized by a unique coalition that included a diverse array of supporters. He expressed gratitude to the “aunties” who played a crucial role in his election, as well as to his wife, Rama, and others who contributed to his success. In a heartfelt moment, he acknowledged his parents, saying, “You have made me into the man I am today. I am so proud to be your son.” His mother, acclaimed Indian American director Mira Nair, is known for her influential films such as “Monsoon Wedding” and “The Namesake.”

As a Democratic Socialist, Mamdani’s platform focused on issues that resonate with many New Yorkers, including affordable housing and social justice. His victory is seen as a reflection of the growing political power of South Asians in the city. With approximately 450,000 South Asians residing in New York City, they represent about 5% of the population, a community that has been rapidly expanding in recent years.

Several media outlets have covered Mamdani’s rise to prominence, emphasizing the grassroots nature of his campaign. Jennifer Chowdhury from Harper’s Bazaar noted that first-generation immigrant women of color, including mothers and grandmothers, were instrumental in powering Mamdani’s campaign from community spaces to local businesses.

Astead W. Herndon from The New York Times Magazine described Mamdani’s coalition-building efforts, which brought together Muslims, South Asians, renters, young people, and progressives. This diverse support base was crucial in mobilizing voters who have often felt overlooked by traditional political candidates.

In an era marked by rising nativism and political cynicism, Mamdani’s campaign has embraced New York City as a beacon for immigrants. Eric Lach from The New Yorker highlighted how Mamdani’s approach stands in stark contrast to the prevailing sentiments in some parts of the country, showcasing a vision of inclusivity and hope.

Mamdani’s election also brings attention to the ongoing challenges faced by Muslim communities in the United States. He has spoken candidly about the impact of Islamophobia, particularly in the wake of events like 9/11, and how these experiences have shaped his perspective and commitment to public service.

As Mamdani prepares to take office, his victory is not just a personal achievement but a symbol of the changing dynamics in American politics. His ascent reflects a broader trend of increasing representation for marginalized communities, particularly in urban centers like New York City.

With his election, many are hopeful that Mamdani will continue to advocate for the needs of diverse communities and work towards a more equitable city. As he steps into this historic role, the pronunciation of his name—MUM-DHA-NEE—may become a common refrain, symbolizing a new chapter in New York City’s political narrative.

Source: Original article

Supreme Court Reviews Legality of Trump’s Tariffs and Economic Effects

Staff ReporterBusiness, Economy, Politics 0

As the Supreme Court reviews the legality of President Trump’s tariffs, the economic implications of these import taxes continue to unfold, affecting consumers and businesses alike.

President Trump’s tariffs, among the highest imposed since the Great Depression, have had a profound impact on the U.S. economy. These import taxes have generated billions in revenue for the federal government but have also incurred significant costs for consumers and businesses. Currently, average tariffs have surged to nearly 18%, a stark increase from just 2.4% prior to Trump’s re-election. The Treasury Department is now collecting close to four times the tariff revenue compared to the previous year, with nearly half of this revenue—amounting to billions of dollars—under scrutiny by the Supreme Court.

The tariffs form a central part of Trump’s trade strategy, aimed at bolstering domestic manufacturing, addressing trade deficits, and applying political pressure on international trading partners. However, the economic ramifications are multifaceted. While these tariffs have contributed approximately $224 billion to government revenue, they have simultaneously led to increased prices for everyday goods, including apparel, furniture, and electronics. Retailers have expressed concerns that ongoing tariffs could further elevate consumer prices, contributing to rising inflation, which reached 3% annually in September 2025, up from 2.3% earlier that year.

The economic burden extends beyond consumers. Numerous businesses, particularly those reliant on imported electronics, automotive parts, and other components, are struggling with unpredictable tariff fluctuations, complicating their supply chain management. Although it is often claimed that foreign suppliers bear the brunt of these costs, the reality is that U.S. importers and manufacturers typically absorb the tariffs, resulting in higher costs that are frequently passed on to consumers. The financial impact is significant, with households facing an estimated additional monthly expense exceeding $1,300. Many businesses are either absorbing these costs or raising prices in response to the tariffs.

Legal challenges surrounding Trump’s tariffs center on their extensive application and whether the president exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of the 1970s. This law grants the president emergency powers to regulate trade but does not explicitly mention tariffs. Legal experts and business groups argue that utilizing this law to impose broad tariffs infringes upon constitutional limits on presidential power, leading to high-stakes deliberations at the Supreme Court.

A ruling against the administration could result in the dismantling of current tariff policies, potential refunds for duties paid, and broader implications for international trade relations. Conversely, if the Supreme Court upholds the tariffs, they may continue to serve as a significant tool in U.S. trade strategy, albeit at a cost to consumers and business profitability. Meanwhile, President Trump and his supporters maintain that these tariffs are essential for national strength, while critics caution about the long-term effects on economic stability and global relations.

As the Supreme Court deliberates, the outcome could reshape the landscape of U.S. trade policy and its economic repercussions for years to come, highlighting the delicate balance between national interests and global economic dynamics.

Source: Original article

Lawsuit Challenges New Public Service Loan Forgiveness Rule by Education Department

Staff ReporterEducation, Politics, USA 0

Four non-profit organizations have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education, challenging a new rule that could disqualify certain employers from the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program.

Washington, D.C., Nov. 4 — A coalition of four non-profit public-interest organizations has initiated legal action against the U.S. Department of Education (ED) over a newly established rule that threatens to disqualify certain employers from participating in the federal Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program. The plaintiffs in this case include Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the American Immigration Council, The Door – A Center of Alternatives, Inc., and the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC). They are represented by Student Defense and the Public Citizen Litigation Group.

The new rule, finalized on October 31, was implemented in response to an Executive Order issued by former President Donald Trump. It grants the Secretary of Education the authority to disqualify employers from the PSLF program if they are deemed to have a “substantial illegal purpose.” This determination will be made unilaterally by ED, based on its assessment of whether an organization has engaged in activities that the current administration disapproves of, particularly concerning immigration, gender-affirming care, and alleged discrimination, among other issues. Critics argue that the rule’s vague and broad language allows for arbitrary enforcement against mission-driven organizations that may express views contrary to those of the government.

The implications of this regulation could be significant for the approximately 2.5 million federal student loan borrowers who have collectively dedicated over 100 million months to public service jobs in pursuit of PSLF forgiveness. The lawsuit contends that the new rule will hinder employers in specific fields, such as immigrant advocacy, from effectively recruiting and training employees. Furthermore, it asserts that the rule contradicts the PSLF statute, exceeds the Department’s regulatory authority, and infringes upon the constitutional rights of nonprofits whose employees are eligible for PSLF.

Established in 2007, the PSLF program was designed to encourage graduates to pursue careers in public service. It offers federal student loan forgiveness to individuals who spend ten years repaying their loans while employed full-time in qualifying public service positions. The statute outlines a clear list of eligible employers, which includes military service, emergency management, public health, government, public safety, law enforcement, early childhood education, library science, and all 501(c)(3) organizations, among others.

The lawsuit seeks a court ruling declaring the new rule unlawful and asserting that ED lacks the authority to alter the statutory criteria for PSLF. Cormac Early, an attorney at Public Citizen Litigation Group and the lead counsel on the case, emphasized that “Congress created PSLF to support those who work in public service jobs, not to let the President play favorites. The Trump administration should not be allowed to use a program designed to reward public service as a weapon against its political enemies.”

Student Defense President Aaron Ament added, “Congress made a promise that if Americans give back to the country, the country will give back to them. Now the Trump Administration wants the power to renege on that promise if they disagree with your employer’s mission or perceived political views. This new, unlawful rule is a slap in the face to the millions of first responders, health workers, teachers, and other public servants who believed the government could be trusted to keep its word.”

Kerry Kennedy, President of RFK Human Rights, stated, “The Trump Administration’s attack on the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program strikes at the heart of civic space and public service. By targeting individuals who choose to work in nonprofits defending the human rights of immigrants and advancing diversity, inclusion, and transgender rights, this rule seeks to silence voices for equity and justice while weakening these organizations’ ability to recruit the next generation of leaders.”

Jorge Loweree, Managing Director of Programs and Strategy at the American Immigration Council, remarked, “Public Service Loan Forgiveness was a clear commitment from the government to individuals who have dedicated themselves to public service. This regulation weaponizes that commitment. No one should be forced to choose between supporting their neighbors and securing the financial stability they were promised.”

Juan Proaño, CEO of the LULAC Institute, expressed concern for Latino families, stating, “Latino families across the country rely on mission-driven nonprofits for immigration assistance, health care, and programs that support underserved young adults. This rule hands any administration a blank check to punish nonprofits it dislikes and jeopardizes the future of the teachers, nurses, veterans, and legal advocates who serve the public every day.”

The lawsuit highlights the potential consequences of the new rule on public service employment and the broader implications for civic engagement and advocacy in the United States.

Source: Original article

Rep. Ami Bera Launches Campaign for CA-03 Seat in 2024

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Representative Ami Bera has announced his candidacy for re-election in California’s newly redrawn Third Congressional District, positioning Democrats to potentially reclaim the House majority in 2024.

Following the successful passage of Proposition 50, Representative Ami Bera (CA-06) declared his intention to run for re-election in California’s newly redrawn Third Congressional District. Bera enters the race with nearly $2 million in cash on hand, a significant financial advantage that strengthens the Democratic Party’s position to capture CA-03 and regain control of the House of Representatives next November.

Nonpartisan analysis indicates that the new district has a D+6 partisan lean, with Vice President Kamala Harris winning it by approximately 10 points in the 2024 election. Bera’s candidacy introduces one of California’s most experienced and well-resourced Democratic leaders into a prime opportunity for pickup.

Since first being elected in 2013, Bera has represented Sacramento County, establishing deep roots in the region and a proven track record of winning competitive races. He initially gained his seat by defeating a nine-term Republican incumbent in one of the nation’s most closely watched contests. Bera has successfully navigated three of the most competitive House elections in the country—2014, 2016, and 2018—each time increasing his margin of victory.

In the 2024 election, Bera outperformed Harris by 2.4 points in CA-06, showcasing his ability to exceed favorable Democratic baselines and garner support in swing neighborhoods and suburban communities.

Notably, Bera has represented approximately 60 percent of the new Third District at various points during his congressional career, providing him with a solid foundation as he introduces himself to new constituents across the district.

“The path to a Democratic House majority runs through California,” Bera stated. “I’m stepping up in CA-03 to help deliver that majority and to keep fighting for the hardworking families who call the greater Sacramento region home.”

With a background as a physician, Bera has dedicated 21 years to serving his community as a doctor, including roles as Sacramento County’s Chief Medical Officer and as a Clinical Professor of Medicine and Dean of Admissions at UC Davis. In Congress, he has prioritized expanding access to healthcare, supporting the middle class, and achieving tangible results for the greater Sacramento area, even amidst partisan challenges.

Since taking office, Bera has assisted over 34,000 constituents and returned more than $22 million to Sacramento County taxpayers through federal casework and benefits.

“Our campaign is built to win tough races,” Bera emphasized. “With nearly $2 million in the bank, a strong record of service, and a clear path to victory, we’re ready to take back the House majority and place a much-needed check on Donald Trump’s power.”

Bera brings over a decade of legislative experience to CA-03, currently serving as the Ranking Member of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on East Asia and the Pacific, a senior Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, and a member of the pro-growth New Democrat Coalition.

Dr. Ami Bera has lived in Sacramento County for nearly 30 years, further solidifying his connection to the community he aims to represent.

Source: Original article

Medicaid Cuts Impact Indian-American Seniors’ Quality of Life

Staff ReporterElection, Health, Nation India 0

Recent cuts to Medicaid threaten the ability of families, particularly within the Indian American community, to care for their aging loved ones with dignity and support.

When the Senate passed the sweeping Megabill that significantly reduced funding for Medicaid, it marked more than a mere shift in healthcare policy; it represented the unraveling of a vital lifeline for millions of American families. For Indian Americans, these cuts are particularly devastating, jeopardizing core values such as caring for elders with dignity, maintaining close family ties, and ensuring that parents and grandparents age surrounded by love rather than institutional walls.

My 100-year-old grandmother has lived with our family for decades, benefiting from home health services covered by Medicaid. This support has allowed four generations to share in her twilight years. Without it, the burden would fall heavily on my late mother, who battled metastatic cancer while caregiving for her; my uncle, who faces chronic illness in his seventies; and my aunt, now in her sixties. These narratives are not isolated; they reflect the experiences of countless Indian American families nationwide who honor their elders while relying on stable public support to do so.

The recent cuts to Medicaid threaten to dismantle the caregiving compact that has sustained many families. According to the Caregiving in the U.S. 2025 report by AARP and the National Alliance for Caregiving, there are currently 63 million unpaid family caregivers across the United States—approximately one in five Americans. Among them, about 6% identify as Asian American, often navigating the cultural expectations of multigenerational care alongside systemic challenges such as healthcare access, language barriers, and a lack of culturally relevant home and community-based services. Notably, three in ten caregivers of older adults provide over 20 hours of unpaid care each week, often while juggling employment commitments.

In Indian American households, where nearly 70% of older adults live with or near family members, Medicaid-funded home supports make it feasible to fulfill cultural obligations without succumbing to financial and emotional strain. The AARP report highlights that more than half of all caregivers report experiencing high emotional stress, with one in four facing severe financial burdens. The cuts to Medicaid introduce yet another layer of impossible choices: leave the workforce, sacrifice personal health, or place loved ones in understaffed facilities.

The new bill’s cuts of over $1 trillion to Medicaid strike at the fragile infrastructure that supports family caregivers, including transportation to medical appointments, respite care, physical therapy, home health aides, and essential items like dentures and eyeglasses. These services have played a crucial role in keeping aging Americans safe, independent, and at home.

This situation is particularly disheartening given that caregiver policy had begun to make progress. Bipartisan initiatives, such as President Trump’s RAISE Family Caregiver Act in 2018 and President Biden’s National Strategy to Support Family Caregivers in 2022, aimed to provide recognition and resources for caregivers. However, the recent Medicaid cuts threaten to reverse these advancements, eroding trust and pushing millions back into isolation and exhaustion, forced to bear the weight of caregiving alone.

In Indian culture, elders are often viewed as repositories of memory and identity. Caring for them is not seen as a burden but as a blessing—a recognition of the wisdom accumulated over a lifetime. However, blessings cannot substitute for broken systems. When policymakers strip financial support from caregivers, they compel families to choose between their jobs and their aging parents, between pursuing the American dream and fulfilling their cultural responsibilities.

At 100 years old, my grandmother continues to share her life stories, reminiscing about her childhood in pre-Independence India. She walks diligently on her rolling walker, engaging with each generation and communicating in broken English with her great-grandchildren, who delight in their attempts to speak Gujarati. The loss of Medicaid support now threatens these cherished interactions within our home.

As life expectancy increases and the prevalence of dementia is projected to double by 2040, the demand for home and community-based care will surge. The recent cuts to Medicaid will do the opposite of what is needed; they will accelerate institutionalization, caregiver burnout, and despair.

This issue transcends party lines. Caregiving is a universal experience that connects us across age, race, and political affiliations. AARP data indicates that 75% of Americans wish to age at home, but for this to remain a viable option, Medicaid must be preserved and strengthened.

For Indian American families, who view caregiving as an act of love and legacy, this is not merely a policy debate; it is a collective struggle to uphold the sanctity of home. As we approach Family Caregiving Awareness Month this November, let us urge our lawmakers to reverse these damaging actions and restore faith in the promise America once made to its elders: that aging with grace is not a privilege but a fundamental right.

Source: Original article

New U.S. Assistant Secretary Paul Kapur Engages with Indian Envoy

Staff ReporterDiplomacy, Politics, USA 0

Assistant Secretary of State Paul Kapur met with Indian Ambassador Vinay Kwatra in Washington, discussing shared priorities and strengthening U.S.-India relations.

WASHINGTON, DC – India’s Ambassador to the United States, Vinay Kwatra, recently hosted Paul Kapur, the newly appointed Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs, at his residence in Washington.

On November 4, the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs shared a message on X, expressing gratitude for the meeting. “Thank you @AmbVMKwatra for graciously hosting me at India House last night. Appreciated the opportunity to discuss shared bilateral and regional priorities, including strengthening the U.S.-India relationship,” Kapur tweeted.

Kapur, an Indian American security expert, was sworn in as Assistant Secretary on October 22, marking a significant appointment within the Trump administration for the region. He is also a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution and a professor at the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California.

His confirmation came after a Senate vote in early October, alongside the appointment of Sergio Gor as the new U.S. Ambassador to India. During his Senate confirmation hearing in June, Kapur reflected on his unique background, stating that his career had “come full circle.”

“I can’t avoid the feeling of having come full circle. I was born in New Delhi to an Indian father and an American mother. Although I visited India often during my childhood, I grew up in the United States as a thoroughly American kid, never imagining that my career would someday return me to the place where I was born,” he shared.

In discussing U.S.-India relations, Kapur emphasized the multitude of common interests shared by the two nations. He noted the importance of ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific region, which he asserted should not be dominated by China. He also highlighted the need to expand bilateral trade and build a more symmetrical and profitable economic relationship.

Kapur pointed out the significance of facilitating technology sharing and innovation, as well as ensuring access to energy resources essential for both countries’ economic growth.

Regarding Pakistan, he mentioned his intent to “pursue security cooperation where beneficial to U.S. interests.”

The Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs plays a vital role in shaping U.S. policy concerning security, economic engagement, counterterrorism, and infrastructure development across the broader South and Central Asia region.

As the U.S. continues to navigate its foreign policy in South Asia, the discussions between Kapur and Kwatra signal a commitment to strengthening ties and addressing shared challenges.

Source: Original article

Kansas Mayor Faces Charges for Allegedly Voting as Noncitizen

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Kansas Mayor Joe Ceballos faces criminal charges for allegedly voting as a non-U.S. citizen in multiple elections, raising concerns about voter fraud and registration integrity.

Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach and Secretary of State Scott Schwab announced on Wednesday that they have filed criminal charges against Joe Ceballos, the mayor of Coldwater, Kansas. The charges allege that Ceballos, a lawful permanent resident from Mexico, voted in several elections despite not being a U.S. citizen.

The charges, which include perjury and voting without being qualified, stem from Ceballos’s participation in elections held in 2022, 2023, and 2024. If convicted, he could face a maximum penalty of more than five years in prison.

Kobach and Schwab, both elected Republicans, revealed that six charges have been filed in Comanche County against Ceballos. The mayor previously served as a city councilman before taking on his current role.

In a broader context, the issue of noncitizen voting has been a point of contention among Republicans, who argue that it is a significant problem. Kobach, a long-time advocate for stricter immigration enforcement and voter ID laws, stated, “Noncitizen voting is a real problem. It is not something that happens once in a decade. It is something that happens fairly frequently.”

States are legally required to maintain accurate voter registration lists, a process often referred to as “cleaning” the voter rolls. This includes using external databases to identify noncitizens. However, Kobach acknowledged that these methods are not foolproof.

Ceballos’s case has drawn attention not only because of the allegations but also due to the implications for local governance. Kobach noted that city officials, including mayors, are required to be U.S. citizens, a point he emphasized even though it is not classified as a criminal offense.

As the investigation continues, Kobach has not disclosed how state officials determined that Ceballos allegedly voted as a noncitizen. However, he claimed that investigators possess “unassailable evidence” against the mayor.

Ceballos was on the ballot for re-election on Election Day, but the official results have yet to be certified. Kobach expressed concerns about the integrity of the electoral process, stating, “In large part, our system right now is based on trust, trust that when the person signs the registration or signs the poll books saying that he is a qualified elector or that he is a United States citizen, that the person is telling the truth. In this case, we allege that Mr. Ceballos violated that trust.”

In an effort to enhance the integrity of voter registration, Kobach and Schwab have begun utilizing a federal government database designed to cross-check voter rolls with immigration records. They anticipate that this initiative will help identify additional voting violations in the future.

Ceballos is scheduled to make his first court appearance on December 3.

Source: Original article

MAGA Supporters Claim Immigration Influenced Mamdani’s NYC Mayoral Victory

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics, USA 0

Social media reactions to Zohran Mamdani’s election as New York City mayor reveal a surge of criticism from MAGA supporters, who attribute his victory to rising immigration and demographic shifts.

Following the election of Zohran Mamdani as the new mayor of New York City, social media has been buzzing with reactions, making #NewYork one of the top trending hashtags. Among the most vocal are MAGA supporters, who have expressed their discontent by claiming that increasing immigration and changing demographics significantly influenced Mamdani’s victory.

One of the posts gaining traction on X, formerly known as Twitter, encapsulated the outrage among conservative users. “New York elected a Muslim who supports aborting babies with a heartbeat, arms, fingers, and toes. Virginia elected a man who fantasized about killing conservatives and their babies. Violence is officially normalized in the Democrat Party. Pray for America,” the user wrote, reflecting the tone of anger circulating in right-wing circles.

In recent discussions on X, several users have pointed to demographic data to illustrate what they perceive as a troubling trend. A notable thread by commentator Matt Walsh stated, “A third world communist won in New York because New York is a third world city now. This is mass migration working exactly as intended.”

Another user, William E. Wolfe, expressed a more dire sentiment, writing, “It’s incredibly important to understand that Mamdani was not actually elected mayor of the historic American city that we know as ‘New York’… And his election is not the beginning of the end for NYC—it’s a death certificate. Finally, it’s a reminder that everything right now inescapably comes back to immigration.” Wolfe’s comments suggest that he believes unchecked immigration will continue to reshape the political landscape in ways detrimental to traditional American values.

These posts exemplify a broader narrative among certain social media users, who intertwine demographic statistics with pointed rhetoric. They argue that immigration and demographic shifts are directly responsible for the Democratic Party’s electoral success. The underlying message suggests that the Democratic Party, with the aid of immigration, is intentionally reshaping the electorate to its advantage. Many users express alarm, framing these changes as an existential threat to what they consider traditional American identity.

Mamdani’s victory speech has further fueled this discourse. In a clip shared widely on social media, he stated, “New York will remain a city of immigrants, a city built by immigrants, powered by immigrants, and as of tonight, led by an immigrant.” This statement has been met with mixed reactions, with some conservative users interpreting it as a sign of cultural decline.

In the wake of Mamdani’s election, X has seen an influx of videos and images that convey a sense of despair among conservative users. One particularly striking image reads, “RIP NYC: Founded 1624, Died 2025,” suggesting that the city’s identity has been irrevocably changed. Accompanying posts lament the perceived “death” of New York, framing Mamdani’s election as a final blow to what they view as the city’s traditional culture and values.

Some users have taken the anti-immigration narrative even further, linking Mamdani’s win to the influence of foreign-born and female voters. One user wrote, “Zohran Mamdani won New York City’s mayoral race thanks to super-blocs created by women voters and foreign-born voters. Noticing patterns? We need our Gen Z native-born MEN to realize that now is their time to restore order and Christian Patriotism. Christ is King.” This rhetoric illustrates how some users perceive immigration and demographic change as a direct threat, calling for action from native-born citizens.

Another user amplified the anti-immigration sentiment by sharing a poll that suggested most of Mamdani’s voters had lived in New York for less than five or ten years. “People born in New York overwhelmingly rejected him. They remember,” the user claimed. Such posts frequently attack immigration and the influence of newcomers, framing Mamdani’s victory as evidence that recent arrivals are reshaping the city’s political landscape.

Taking the rhetoric a step further, Gabe Guidarini, Vice President of College Republicans America, made a historical reference, stating, “Demography is destiny. Thanks, Ronald Reagan!” By invoking Reagan, Guidarini linked current demographic changes and Mamdani’s victory to the long-term effects of the 1965 immigration reforms, suggesting that shifts in population composition were an inevitable factor shaping electoral outcomes today.

The 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, enacted under President Lyndon B. Johnson, reshaped U.S. immigration by prioritizing family reunification and ending quotas that favored Northern and Western European immigrants. This act opened U.S. immigration to a more diverse array of countries, significantly altering the immigrant population.

In response to the new realities created by the 1965 Act, Ronald Reagan’s 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act offered amnesty to millions of undocumented immigrants and introduced employer sanctions to curb illegal hiring. Together, these legislative measures set the stage for the modern U.S. immigration system, balancing legal pathways with regulatory oversight.

The discourse surrounding Mamdani’s election underscores the deep divisions in American society over immigration and demographic change. As social media continues to amplify these sentiments, the implications for future elections and cultural identity remain a topic of intense debate.

Source: Original article

Novo Nordisk Reaches Agreement with U.S. on Obesity Drug Pricing

Staff ReporterHealth, Health Science, Politics 0

Novo Nordisk has reached an agreement with the U.S. on maximum fair prices for its semaglutide-based drugs, effective January 2027, as part of the Inflation Reduction Act.

Novo Nordisk announced on Wednesday that it has agreed to the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act’s (IRA) negotiated maximum fair prices for semaglutide, the active ingredient in its widely used medications, Ozempic and Wegovy. This agreement will take effect in January 2027.

“While maintaining all legal challenges and rights, Novo Nordisk accepted the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act’s Maximum Fair Price (MFP) for Ozempic, Rybelsus, and Wegovy in Medicare Part D, effective as of January 2027,” the Danish pharmaceutical company stated.

These medications are included in the second batch of 15 drugs selected under President Biden’s 2022 IRA program, which enables Medicare to negotiate prices for some of the most expensive treatments available to seniors and individuals with disabilities.

Novo Nordisk indicated that the estimated direct impact of a semaglutide MFP in Medicare Part D, had it been implemented on January 1, 2025, would have resulted in a negative low single-digit impact on global sales growth for the entire year. The company now anticipates that its sales for 2025 will grow by up to 11% and operating profit by as much as 7% at constant exchange rates. This is a revision from its previous forecast of up to 14% revenue growth and a 10% profit increase.

Headquartered in Bagsværd, Denmark, Novo Nordisk is a prominent global pharmaceutical firm specializing in therapies for diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular conditions, and rare diseases. Its semaglutide-based drugs, including Ozempic for diabetes management and Wegovy for obesity treatment, are crucial to the company’s growth trajectory. However, competition in the U.S. market has intensified, particularly from Eli Lilly and other GLP-1 alternatives.

In the first half of 2025, Novo Nordisk reported approximately 18% sales growth at constant exchange rates, with revenues reaching DKK 154.9 billion and an operating profit of DKK 72.2 billion. Despite this strong performance, the company has faced challenges such as slower U.S. adoption, pricing pressures, and competitive market dynamics, leading it to revise its full-year 2025 guidance to 8–14% sales growth and 10–16% operating profit growth at constant exchange rates. This adjustment reflects a significant slowdown expected in the latter half of the year.

As part of its strategic transformation, Novo Nordisk plans to reduce its global workforce by approximately 9,000 positions, which constitutes about 11% of its total workforce of around 78,400 employees. This move aims to streamline operations and concentrate resources on core metabolic and cardiovascular therapies.

Despite these challenges, Novo Nordisk maintains a robust product portfolio, a strong global presence, and a commitment to ongoing innovation. The company continues to lead in metabolic and obesity care while navigating an increasingly competitive and complex global market.

In summary, Novo Nordisk’s acceptance of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act’s negotiated maximum fair prices for its semaglutide-based drugs marks a significant development in the pharmaceutical landscape. The company has acknowledged that had these prices been in effect in 2025, global sales growth could have been negatively impacted by a low single-digit percentage, indicating that the projected effects are not yet realized.

Looking ahead, Novo Nordisk faces ongoing challenges, including regulatory changes, pricing pressures, and heightened competition. These factors underscore that while the company’s 2025 results are strong, they reflect a combination of actual performance and anticipated market dynamics, with future growth not guaranteed.

Source: Original article

Zohran Mamdani Becomes New York’s First Indian-American Muslim Mayor

Staff ReporterElection, Nation, Politics 0

Zohran Mamdani has made history as New York City’s first Indian American and Muslim mayor, winning a hard-fought election against prominent opponents.

Zohran Mamdani is set to be sworn in as the 111th mayor of New York City, marking a historic milestone as the first Indian American to lead the city. Mamdani triumphed over former Governor Andrew Cuomo, who ran as an independent, and Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa in a groundbreaking three-way race.

As the polls closed at 9:00 p.m. across all five boroughs, it became evident that New York City was in for a momentous night. Mamdani’s campaign was characterized by its grassroots approach, which defied conventional canvassing strategies and challenged established political figures like Cuomo and Sliwa. Throughout the campaign, he garnered support not only from progressives but also from younger and more diverse voters across various demographics.

Following Mamdani’s unexpected victory, Senator Bernie Sanders took to social media to commend his achievement, stating, “Starting at 1% in the polls, Zohran Mamdani pulled off one of the great political upsets in modern American history.” Sanders expressed his eagerness to collaborate with Mamdani in creating a city that serves all its residents.

For South Asian Americans, Mamdani’s election is more than just a political achievement; it symbolizes hope and resilience. In an era marked by rising anti-immigrant sentiment and racial division, his victory reinforces the belief that hard work, merit, and principles can prevail.

Celebrations erupted across New York City as Indian Americans and other South Asian communities took to the streets. Japneet Singh, a community activist and former City Council candidate from Queens, reflected on the significance of the moment, stating, “Growing up in NYC post-9/11, I never thought I would see a South Asian mayor in my lifetime.”

The atmosphere in Astoria, Queens, where Mamdani and his wife cast their votes earlier in the day, was electric. Groups gathered in pubs and eateries throughout the city, eagerly awaiting the election results. When the announcement was made, cheers erupted, followed by music and dancing that lasted well into the night.

Aditi Paul, an education strategist and community builder based in New York, captured the excitement of the evening, saying, “Zohran is in the air!” She added, “Mamdani went from rapping kanda chap chap to being the mayor of New York City in a span of 10 years. If this is not the most New York thing ever, I don’t know what is.”

Saikat Chakrabarti, another Indian American candidate running for Congress in California’s 11th congressional district, remarked, “Zohran just proved that it does not matter how much money they throw at you. Organized people will defeat organized money if you stand for real change.”

Mamdani’s victory has garnered attention not only in New York but also across the United States and even in India. Supporters attribute the strength of his campaign to his ability to unite people under a common vision, even among those who may have disagreed with him on specific issues. His messages regarding affordability, quality of life, and social justice resonated with many voters.

A notable display of support came from @HindusforZohran, a grassroots group that emerged on Instagram following Mamdani’s primary win. In the days leading up to the election, its members held a special pooja, expressing their hopes for his success.

Activist Ruchira Gupta noted that Mamdani effectively reached out to various communities, including liberal Jews, who voted in significant numbers for him. Entrepreneur Anip Patel emphasized the historical significance of Mamdani’s election, stating, “Zohran Mamdani is the new Mayor of NYC – making a historic moment in the city’s political landscape. A noteworthy moment in history, and a night that will be studied and discussed in the years to come.”

As New York City prepares for a new chapter under Mamdani’s leadership, his victory is expected to inspire future generations and reshape the political landscape in profound ways.

Source: Original article

Hegseth Supports South Korea’s Enhanced Defense Role Against North Korea

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, USA 0

U.S. Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth commended South Korea’s plans to enhance military spending as the allies aim to bolster deterrence against North Korean aggression.

U.S. Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth expressed strong support for South Korea’s initiative to increase its military spending and assume a more significant role in defending against North Korean threats. This development comes as the U.S. seeks to shift its focus towards addressing challenges posed by China.

During a press briefing following annual security discussions with South Korean Defense Minister Ahn Gyu-back in Seoul, Hegseth conveyed his optimism regarding South Korea’s commitment to enhancing its defense capabilities. He stated that the increased investments would empower South Korea to lead its conventional deterrence efforts against North Korea.

South Korean President Lee Jae Myung addressed lawmakers on Tuesday, advocating for an 8.2% increase in defense spending for the upcoming year. He emphasized that this funding boost would facilitate the modernization of military weapon systems and reduce South Korea’s reliance on U.S. military support.

Hegseth highlighted the ongoing defense cooperation between the U.S. and South Korea, particularly in the maintenance and repair of U.S. warships stationed in South Korea. He noted that these activities leverage South Korea’s shipbuilding capabilities and ensure that the U.S. military remains prepared to respond to any crisis.

“We face, as we both acknowledge, a dangerous security environment, but our alliance is stronger than ever,” Hegseth remarked, underscoring the importance of the U.S.-South Korea partnership in the current geopolitical landscape.

While the primary focus of the alliance is to counter potential North Korean aggression, Hegseth acknowledged that other regional threats also warrant attention. “There’s no doubt flexibility for regional contingencies is something we would take a look at, but we are focused on standing by our allies here and ensuring the threat of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is not a threat to the Republic of Korea,” he stated. He reaffirmed the U.S. commitment to extending nuclear deterrence as previously established.

In recent years, discussions between the U.S. and South Korea have revolved around integrating U.S. nuclear capabilities with South Korea’s conventional military assets. Notably, South Korea does not possess its own nuclear weapons. Defense Minister Ahn dismissed speculation regarding the country’s potential pursuit of a nuclear weapons program or the redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear weapons, which were withdrawn from South Korea in the 1990s.

On the same day, South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff reported that the country had detected North Korea test-firing approximately ten rounds of artillery into its western waters on Monday, just prior to Hegseth’s arrival at an inter-Korean border village for his two-day visit to South Korea. Earlier in the week, Hegseth had also visited the Demilitarized Zone along the North Korean border.

As the security situation in the region continues to evolve, the commitment from both the U.S. and South Korea to enhance military readiness and cooperation remains crucial in addressing the persistent threat posed by North Korea.

Source: Original article

-+=