Federal Court Halts ICE’s Detention of Immigrant Teens Reaching Age 18

On December 12, 2025, a federal court in Washington, D.C., ruled against ICE’s policy of detaining immigrant teens who turn 18, reinforcing protections for unaccompanied minors.

Washington, D.C., December 12, 2025 — A federal court in Washington, D.C., issued a significant ruling on December 12, ordering U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to adhere to a long-standing court order that safeguards immigrant teens from being transferred to adult detention centers. This decision blocks a recent ICE policy that mandated the automatic transfer of unaccompanied children to adult facilities upon reaching the age of 18.

The court’s order specifically pertains to children who entered the United States as unaccompanied minors and who “age out” of the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). The ORR is the federal program responsible for caring for unaccompanied children by placing them in shelters and subsequently with family members or guardians.

This ruling enforces a permanent injunction established in the 2021 case Garcia Ramirez v. ICE, which obligates ICE to fulfill its statutory responsibilities by considering the least restrictive settings available for every unaccompanied child who turns 18. Furthermore, it mandates that all age-outs be eligible for alternatives to detention.

Suchita Mathur, a senior litigation attorney with the American Immigration Council, emphasized the importance of the ruling, stating, “This ruling makes clear that ICE cannot secretly flout the law or blatantly ignore court orders. ICE tried to detain newly-18-year-olds as a matter of course. These are kids that ICE officers have found, in almost all cases, do not pose a danger or flight risk, with sponsors, families, and community support waiting for them. This decision puts a stop to that.”

The controversial policy, announced on October 1, required that all unaccompanied children turning 18 be transferred to adult detention, regardless of whether they had safe homes and sponsors ready to take them in. Critics argue that adult detention poses significant risks to the teenagers’ short- and long-term development. Currently, ICE is holding a record number of individuals in detention, leading to overcrowding and inhumane conditions, including inadequate medical care, abusive treatment, and limited access to legal and psychological assistance. The court found that the automatic transfer of teens to adult detention, without considering safer, age-appropriate alternatives, constitutes a violation of the law.

Mark Fleming, associate director of federal litigation at the National Immigrant Justice Center, remarked, “Today’s ruling sends a powerful message: ICE can’t put teenagers in dangerous, overcrowded facilities just because they turned 18. There are safer, lawful options that keep young people connected to school, family, and community. That’s what the law requires, and that’s what this order restores.”

The court’s ruling mandates that ICE immediately cease following its October 1 guidance and remove anyone who was placed in detention as a result of this policy.

This decision marks a critical step in protecting the rights and well-being of immigrant teens, ensuring that they are not subjected to the harsh realities of adult detention facilities simply due to their age.

For further details, refer to the court order and the opinion.

According to American Immigration Council.

Iran Detains Nobel Laureate Narges Mohammadi; Rights Groups Call for Release

Iran has detained Narges Mohammadi, the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, prompting international calls for her immediate release amid concerns over the country’s crackdown on dissent.

Iranian authorities have arrested Narges Mohammadi, the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize laureate and a leading advocate for human rights in the country, according to her family and the Narges Foundation. The Paris-based organization reported that Mohammadi was forcibly taken into custody on Friday while attending a memorial service in Mashhad, Iran’s second-largest city.

The memorial was held in honor of Khosrow Alikordi, a lawyer and civil rights supporter who was recently found dead in his office. Mohammadi’s brother, Mehdi, confirmed the arrest, describing it as a violent detention executed by security and police forces.

This incident has drawn widespread international condemnation, with rights organizations warning that Iran is intensifying its crackdown on dissent.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee quickly denounced the detention, labeling it “brutal” and demanding Mohammadi’s immediate and unconditional release. In a statement, the committee called on Iranian authorities to clarify Mohammadi’s whereabouts, ensure her safety, and release her without delay. They expressed solidarity with her and others in Iran who advocate for human rights, freedom of expression, and the rule of law.

Mohammadi was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2023 for her decades-long struggle against oppression, particularly her advocacy for women’s rights and her opposition to Iran’s use of capital punishment.

Throughout the past two decades, Mohammadi has spent a significant portion of her life imprisoned in Tehran’s Evin Prison, a facility notorious for housing political dissidents. According to her foundation, she has received multiple convictions totaling 36 years in prison on charges that include acting against national security and spreading propaganda against the state.

In December 2024, Iranian authorities temporarily suspended her sentence for three weeks to allow her to recover from surgery to remove part of a bone in her lower leg, where doctors had discovered a lesion suspected of being cancerous. Although she was expected to return to prison after her medical leave, she remained on furlough until her re-arrest this week.

Despite the ongoing pressure, Mohammadi continued to speak out publicly during her temporary release, drawing renewed attention to Iran’s human rights record.

Just days before her arrest, Mohammadi authored an essay for Time magazine, arguing that true peace is unattainable in Iran under pervasive state control. “Iranians live under constant surveillance, censorship, arbitrary detention, and the ever-present threat of violence,” she wrote, calling for global support for Iran’s civil society, independent journalism, women’s rights activists, and human rights defenders.

In a December 2024 interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, Mohammadi remained resolute. “Whether I am inside Evin prison or outside, my objective is unchanged,” she stated. “Until democracy is achieved, we will not stop.”

During her years in prison, Mohammadi has repeatedly reported mistreatment and abuse of detained women, including prolonged solitary confinement and sexual violence. In letters and interviews, she has described assaults allegedly carried out by security forces, prison officials, and medical staff. Iranian authorities have consistently denied these allegations, dismissing them as false.

The Narges Foundation indicated that several other activists were also arrested during the memorial service in Mashhad, although details regarding these detentions remain limited. The foundation has called for the immediate release of all individuals detained while paying respects to the late lawyer.

Mohammadi is the mother of teenage twins, Kiana and Ali Rahmani, who accepted the Nobel Peace Prize on her behalf in Oslo. Her husband, Taghi Rahmani—himself a former political prisoner—has long described her as possessing “limitless energy” in the pursuit of freedom.

Speaking previously to CNN, her son Ali expressed pride in his mother despite the personal sacrifices involved. “I have accepted this life,” he said. “Any suffering I endure does not matter.”

As the international community rallies for her release, the situation underscores the ongoing struggle for human rights and freedom of expression in Iran, a fight that Mohammadi has championed for years.

According to The Guardian, the global outcry surrounding Mohammadi’s detention reflects a growing concern over Iran’s treatment of dissenters and the state of human rights in the country.

Year-End Obamacare Challenges Highlight Political Failures in Washington

As Congress heads into the holiday recess, millions of Americans face a potential healthcare crisis due to political gridlock over Affordable Care Act subsidies.

Millions of Americans are once again paying the price for Washington’s dysfunction. As Congress prepares to adjourn for the holidays, lawmakers appear set to leave without resolving a looming healthcare crisis that could cause Affordable Care Act (ACA) premiums to double or worse for millions of families in the coming year. For households already stretched thin, the result will be painful choices—cutting essentials, taking on debt, or dropping health insurance entirely.

With enhanced Covid-era ACA subsidies scheduled to expire on December 31, political paralysis has taken center stage. What unfolded this week was a familiar spectacle of finger-pointing, stalled legislation, and a notable absence of urgency—while the president showed little engagement as the clock ran down.

At the heart of the crisis is a widening partisan divide. Republicans, long hostile to Obamacare, say they want to rein in costs and reduce insurer profits. Democrats insist on extending subsidies but largely refuse to discuss reforms to the law itself.

This impasse played out in the Senate, where two competing bills were brought to the floor despite near-universal recognition that neither would pass. Republicans proposed redirecting subsidies into health savings accounts (HSAs) for some ACA enrollees over two years, a plan backed rhetorically by Donald Trump. Critics argue the approach offers no guarantee that patients could cover full medical costs—particularly in emergencies—leaving families exposed to large bills.

Democrats countered with a proposal to extend the enhanced subsidies for three more years, preserving $0 or near-$0 premiums for many low-income Americans and continuing expanded eligibility for middle-class families. Four Republicans crossed party lines, but the bill fell short of the 60 votes needed to advance.

The stakes extend far beyond Obamacare exchanges. Healthcare costs are climbing across the board, affecting Americans with employer-sponsored coverage as well. This broader affordability crisis is shaping the political landscape ahead of next year’s midterm elections.

The GOP’s razor-thin House majority further complicates matters, making it difficult to pass legislation on virtually any issue. Democrats, for their part, are reluctant to reopen the ACA for reforms, viewing it as the crown jewel of former President Barack Obama’s legacy. Republicans, meanwhile, fear primary challenges if they are seen as “saving” Obamacare.

Yet political reality cuts both ways: millions of Republican voters rely on ACA coverage. Failure to act would directly harm their own base—particularly in swing states, where moderate GOP lawmakers are increasingly alarmed.

Some lawmakers argue that heated rhetoric may eventually create space for compromise. Several proposals are still circulating, including a bipartisan plan from Senators Susan Collins and Bernie Moreno that would extend subsidies for two years while closing income loopholes and requiring modest premium contributions.

Ohio Senator Jon Husted said Congress must act quickly, citing constituents facing soaring premiums. “I don’t want people to suffer,” he said, while also criticizing what he described as systemic fraud within the ACA.

Democrats remain skeptical, viewing Republican reform efforts as thinly veiled attempts to weaken or dismantle Obamacare—a suspicion rooted in years of failed repeal efforts. Still, Democrats are not without blame. Critics note they could have made the subsidies permanent when they previously controlled both Congress and the White House.

Attention now turns to House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has promised a forthcoming plan to reduce premiums “for all Americans.” However, deep divisions within his party threaten to derail any proposal. Conservative lawmakers reject subsidy extensions outright, while moderates warn there is no time to design a new healthcare framework before the deadline.

One last-ditch option involves discharge petitions, which would allow rank-and-file lawmakers to force a vote over leadership objections. Representative Mike Lawler of New York urged Democratic leaders to cooperate, warning that delay would deepen public frustration.

“This is a moment to show the American people that Washington can function,” Lawler said.

Whether Congress rises to that challenge remains uncertain. What is clear is that millions of Americans’ healthcare security now hangs in the balance—a stark reminder of how political stalemate can quickly become a personal crisis, according to Global Net News.

Zohran Mamdani’s Volunteer Efforts Propel His NYC Mayoral Campaign

Zohran Mamdani’s election as New York City mayor showcases the power of grassroots activism, driven by a dedicated volunteer army that continues to mobilize for change.

Since November 5th, when Zohran Mamdani was elected as the new mayor of New York City, the buzz among volunteers has been palpable. Their phones have not stopped ringing, serving as a reminder that the movement is far from over and that there is much work to be done.

Volunteers from all corners of the city, from Astoria in Queens to Harlem and Hell’s Kitchen, have come together to support Mamdani’s vision. Parents, students, and workers have dedicated their time—sometimes even leaving their jobs—to engage in door-to-door canvassing and connect with residents of all ages. This effort transcends traditional political campaigns, evolving into a community movement that resonates deeply with those involved.

“Hi, is Jonathan available?” Lydia asks confidently as she presses the buzzer for an apartment in Chelsea, Manhattan. “I’m Lydia, a volunteer for the Democratic nominee for mayor, Zohran Mamdani,” she introduces herself with a warm smile.

Mamdani’s campaign has become a significant chapter in New York’s political history. Just weeks ago, he emerged as an outsider with a radical platform and an unprecedented volunteer base, ultimately securing the mayoral seat. The key to his success? A passionate group of volunteers who are deeply invested in his vision.

These volunteers go above and beyond, baking birthday cakes for Mamdani, attending debates, wearing his campaign colors of yellow and blue, and participating in online chats like “Gabbers for Zohran” and “Pets for Zohran.” Their enthusiasm and commitment have created a vibrant community around his candidacy.

The impact of Mamdani’s election extends beyond the borders of the United States, resonating in Europe and around the world. His victory has been interpreted as a beacon of hope, inspiring many to engage in grassroots activism. To understand this phenomenon, one must look at the dedicated volunteers—individuals like Lydia, Vivian, Balthazar, Milo, Katie, Bronislaw, Gianna, Sanjana, Diana, and Matt—who have collectively formed a movement that continues to thrive.

Over 100,000 volunteers have participated in daily canvassing and phone banking, breathing life into a campaign that has not waned since election day. Last October, Senator Bernie Sanders praised this grassroots movement during a rally in Queens, calling it a powerful force for American democracy that could inspire change worldwide. A month later, his words ring even truer.

Mamdani’s volunteers knocked on over one million doors, presenting residents with a straightforward yet impactful platform. They engaged with the community, addressing concerns and answering questions without imposing their views. This diverse group of volunteers—young and old, from various racial and ethnic backgrounds—has fostered a sense of solidarity while gathering insights into the economic challenges, hopes, and urgent priorities of New Yorkers.

The foundation of Mamdani’s campaign lies in the dedication of his volunteers, many of whom remain actively involved in shaping his administration. Lydia, a Political Science major from the Upper West Side, first supported Bernie Sanders but found a new passion in volunteering for Mamdani after the primaries. Matt, a 37-year-old software engineer from Queens, recalls the unexpected turnout at Mamdani’s campaign launch in Brooklyn, which motivated him to dedicate his free time to the cause.

Milo, a young man of Russian descent living in Harlem, has been involved with the Democratic Party’s youth committees for years. He was drawn to Mamdani’s charisma and energy, noting that it had been a long time since he encountered such an engaging politician. Bronislaw, a retired professor and political asylee, shares his belief in Mamdani’s platform and his hope for a better New York under his leadership.

Gianna, a Public Health student at Columbia University, utilized an app called MiniVAN to identify eligible voters during the campaign. Her enthusiasm was evident as she knocked on doors, often greeted with warmth and openness. John, a 22-year-old freelance director from Los Angeles, found renewed hope in Mamdani’s campaign after feeling disillusioned by previous elections.

Josh, a 26-year-old law student, and Kevin, a 28-year-old teacher, both express admiration for Mamdani’s progressive ideas and willingness to explore alternative solutions. Vivian, a former software engineer who left her job to volunteer full-time, emphasizes the importance of youth involvement in shaping the future. Katie, who also left a corporate job, felt empowered by Mamdani’s message and the potential for change.

As the movement evolves, Diana Moreno, who is campaigning to succeed Mamdani in his Assembly seat, describes it as “the solidarity that beats fascism.” She emphasizes that this movement is not solely about political office but about building a better world for the community.

On November 21st, Mamdani met with former President Donald Trump in the Oval Office, a surprising encounter that yielded positive remarks from Trump about Mamdani’s potential as mayor. This moment reinforced the belief among Mamdani’s volunteers that they have backed a candidate who genuinely believes in his vision for the city. Jessica from Astoria, who canvassed for Mamdani and is now supporting Moreno, echoes this sentiment, expressing her commitment to sustaining the movement they have built.

The grassroots efforts that propelled Zohran Mamdani to the mayoralty of New York City continue to thrive, driven by a dedicated volunteer army that is committed to enacting meaningful change.

According to India Currents.

Australia’s Social Media Ban Raises Questions About U.S. Child Protection Efforts

Pressure is mounting on U.S. lawmakers to enhance protections for children online following Australia’s recent ban on social media access for users under 16.

Following Australia’s implementation of a nationwide ban on social media for individuals under the age of 16, U.S. lawmakers are increasingly calling for similar measures to better protect children online. The Australian government’s decision to restrict social media access for teenagers has sparked discussions among American politicians about the need for more robust regulations in the United States.

While Congress has enacted some general online safety laws, such as restrictions on the collection of minors’ personal information by social media platforms, it has yet to pass any legislation that would specifically limit who can use these platforms or how they are designed for younger users.

Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., expressed concern about the impact of social media on the mental health of young people, stating, “I see social media as a catastrophe for the mental health of the next generation.” He suggested that the lack of action may stem from opposition within the tech industry, adding, “I imagine it’s the opposition from the tech industry.” Torres acknowledged the complexity of the issue, particularly regarding First Amendment rights, but emphasized the necessity for reform.

Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., also weighed in on the matter, suggesting that more congressional action would be beneficial. “Obviously, we’re a country that values freedom, and so a lot of people feel like that would be either power better exercised by the state or power better exercised by parents,” he said. Johnson noted the importance of holding social media platforms accountable, remarking, “They have technological tools that they could very easily use to keep kids safe.”

The bipartisan response to Australia’s ban has included voices from both sides of the aisle, with figures such as former President Barack Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, and Senators Katie Britt, R-Ala., John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, advocating for improved safety measures for children on social media.

Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., pointed out that a lack of awareness about the dangers of social media may be contributing to Congress’s hesitance to act. “I think it’s gotten worse,” he said, referring to the risks associated with social media for children. “Got to have an age and got to track down something that is destroying our children.”

However, some Republicans have expressed reservations about imposing strict regulations on social media, particularly regarding age restrictions. Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., indicated that she would likely oppose an outright ban on social media for minors. “I’m still a capitalist, and there’s federalism and we have freedom here,” Boebert stated. She urged for legislative solutions that align with the priorities of the American public, asserting, “I think it’s time to read the room of America so we can pass good legislation.”

The ongoing debate reflects a growing recognition of the need for enhanced protections for children in the digital age, as lawmakers grapple with balancing freedom of expression and the safety of young users. As pressure mounts for action, the future of social media regulation in the U.S. remains uncertain.

According to Fox News, the conversation surrounding social media safety for children is likely to intensify in the coming months as lawmakers seek to address these pressing concerns.

Disney Accuses Google of Copyright Theft Amid OpenAI Deal

Disney has issued a cease-and-desist notice to Google, alleging massive copyright violations related to its AI tools, coinciding with a $1 billion partnership with OpenAI.

Disney has formally warned Google to cease its alleged copyright violations, sending a cease-and-desist notice on Wednesday. The notice accuses the tech giant of infringing on Disney’s copyrights on a “massive scale,” according to a report by Variety.

The letter, which was reviewed by Variety, claims that Google has used its artificial intelligence tools and services to commercially circulate unauthorized images and videos of Disney’s intellectual property. Disney’s letter describes Google as operating like a “virtual vending machine,” capable of reproducing, rendering, and distributing copies of Disney’s valuable library of copyrighted characters and other works.

Disney’s concerns extend beyond the sheer volume of alleged infringements. The letter highlights that many of the infringing images generated by Google’s AI services are branded with Google’s Gemini logo, which Disney argues falsely implies that the company has authorized and endorsed the use of its intellectual property.

The cease-and-desist notice specifically mentions that Google’s AI tools have been generating and utilizing material tied to beloved characters from popular franchises such as “Frozen,” “The Lion King,” “Moana,” “The Little Mermaid,” and “Deadpool.” Disney’s portrayal of Google as a “virtual vending machine” suggests that the company is producing knockoff versions of its iconic characters, including Elsa, Deadpool, and a questionable depiction of Moana.

In response to the allegations, Google has not provided a definitive answer but has expressed its intention to engage with Disney on the matter. A spokesperson for Google stated, “We have a longstanding and mutually beneficial relationship with Disney, and will continue to engage with them. More generally, we use public data from the open web to build our AI and have built additional innovative copyright controls like Google-extended and Content ID for YouTube, which give sites and copyright holders control over their content.”

This legal confrontation coincides with Disney’s announcement of a significant $1 billion, three-year partnership with OpenAI. This deal will allow OpenAI to utilize Disney’s most recognizable characters within its Sora AI video generator.

Under the new licensing agreement, Sora and ChatGPT Images are set to begin creating videos featuring approved Disney characters such as Mickey Mouse, Cinderella, and Mufasa early next year. However, the partnership is limited strictly to the characters themselves and does not extend to the use of any actor’s likeness or voice.

Jatin Varma, the former CEO and Founder of Comic Con India, commented on the broader implications of AI in entertainment, stating, “There is no denying that AI tools can be useful, but when it comes to entertainment, we are deluged in AI slop. Most of the content on social media is AI slop. And any legitimate attempts at making content using AI have been mediocre. Writers, actors, animators, and VFX artists may see AI as a threat that can impact their space in the future.”

The situation between Disney and Google highlights the ongoing tensions in the entertainment industry regarding the use of AI and copyright protections, raising questions about the future of creative content in an increasingly digital landscape.

For more details, see Variety.

Major Measles Outbreak Results in Hundreds Quarantined in U.S. County

South Carolina is experiencing a significant measles outbreak, with 111 confirmed cases and hundreds quarantined as health officials emphasize the importance of vaccination to curb the spread.

A major measles outbreak in South Carolina has led to the quarantine of hundreds of residents in Spartanburg County. The South Carolina Department of Health (DPH) reported on Wednesday that the outbreak has resulted in 111 confirmed cases since it was first identified on October 2.

As part of the containment efforts, 254 individuals are currently in quarantine, while 16 others are in isolation to prevent further transmission of the virus. “This significant jump in cases is unfortunate,” a DPH spokesperson remarked during the media briefing.

Public exposure to the virus has been noted at Inman Intermediate School, where 43 students are now in quarantine. Additionally, eight other intermediate and middle schools in the area are also implementing quarantine measures. The DPH indicated that some students have had to quarantine multiple times due to repeated exposure.

Health officials continue to stress that vaccination is the most effective way to prevent the disruption caused by measles in education, employment, and community life. Out of the 111 confirmed cases, a staggering 105 individuals were unvaccinated. The DPH spokesperson highlighted that receiving a vaccination within 72 hours of exposure can prevent the onset of measles infection.

Some of the cases in Spartanburg County are linked to travel exposure, while others remain of unknown origin, suggesting that the virus is circulating within the community.

In a related development, Connecticut has reported its first measles case in four years. The Connecticut Department of Public Health confirmed on Thursday that an unvaccinated child under the age of 10 in Fairfield County was diagnosed with measles after returning from international travel. The child exhibited symptoms several days later, including a runny nose, cough, congestion, fever, and a rash that began on the head and spread across the body.

The Connecticut DPH emphasized that measles is “highly contagious” and can spread rapidly through the air via coughing or sneezing. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately nine out of ten unvaccinated individuals who come into contact with an infected person will contract the virus.

Furthermore, the International Vaccine Access Center has reported that more than 1,800 cases of measles were documented in 2025, marking the highest number since the U.S. declared the virus eliminated in 2000. This figure represents the most cases recorded in three decades.

DPH Commissioner Manisha Juthani, M.D., underscored the importance of vaccination in a recent statement, saying, “The single best way to protect your children and yourself from measles is to be vaccinated. One dose of measles vaccine is about 93% effective, while two doses are about 97% effective.”

As the outbreak continues, health officials are urging residents to ensure they are vaccinated to protect themselves and their communities from the ongoing threat of measles.

For more information on the outbreak and vaccination, residents are encouraged to consult the South Carolina Department of Health and other health resources.

According to Fox News, the situation remains fluid, and ongoing monitoring is essential to control the spread of this highly contagious virus.

New Report Highlights Impact of Trump’s Deportation Agenda on Childcare Crisis

A new report reveals that President Trump’s mass deportation agenda could exacerbate the already critical U.S. childcare crisis, threatening families’ access to essential services and the broader economy.

Washington, D.C., Dec. 11, 2025 — A report released by the American Immigration Council highlights the precarious state of the U.S. childcare system, which is already strained by rising costs, staffing shortages, and high demand. The report warns that President Donald Trump’s mass deportation agenda could lead to catastrophic disruptions in this vital sector.

The report, titled Immigrant Workers and the Childcare Crisis: What’s at Stake for Families and the Economy, reveals that immigrant workers constitute one in five childcare workers across the nation. This percentage is even higher in major metropolitan areas such as Miami and San Jose. Notably, more than half of these workers are non-citizens, and nearly a third are undocumented, placing them at risk of deportation or loss of work authorization.

In addition to statistical analysis, the report includes personal stories from ten childcare providers and parents whose lives have already been affected by enforcement crackdowns and visa uncertainties. Jeremy Robbins, executive director of the American Immigration Council, emphasized the critical role immigrants play in the childcare system. “Working parents already feel the strain of a childcare system that’s barely holding together,” he said. “Parents can’t clock in if they don’t have safe, stable childcare, and immigrants play a key role in providing that. Mass deportation pulls that foundation out from under families and jeopardizes parents’ ability to stay in the labor force.”

The report documents how increased enforcement has already led to significant disruptions in childcare availability in various communities. For instance, a daycare center in south Philadelphia, which primarily serves low-income immigrant families, saw its enrollment drop from 158 children to 97 following enforcement actions. This decline forced the center to lay off staff and close classrooms. Similarly, a preschool in Washington, D.C., experienced teacher resignations due to new barriers to maintaining work authorization.

Some of the report’s key findings include:

Approximately 20.1 percent of childcare workers are immigrants, amounting to over 282,000 individuals, predominantly women.

In cities like San Jose and Miami, immigrants represent over two-thirds of childcare workers. In Los Angeles, New York, and San Francisco, they account for nearly half of the workforce.

Staffing shortages in the childcare sector are already acute. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that 160,200 childcare jobs will open each year over the next decade due to turnover.

Immigrant childcare workers are more likely to be self-employed and work full-time, filling roles that have proven difficult to staff with U.S.-born workers.

Aggressive immigration enforcement has already led to daycare center closures, empty classrooms, and increased absenteeism in some communities.

The report also features testimonies from individuals, including childcare providers and parents, who express concern about the potential tightening of the childcare system due to mass raids and increased visa restrictions. One mother, identified as ‘Jen’ from New York City, shared her anxiety: “I want to be productive. I want to be part of the workforce. As things ratchet up, there’s always a little voice in my head, ‘Please, please don’t revoke visas.’ But if my au pair goes, then I would have to quit my job.”

Disruptions to the U.S. childcare system resulting from Trump’s immigration policies are poised to impact not only individual households but also the broader labor market. According to U.S. census data analyzed in the report, in 2025, 12.8 million households with children under the age of 14—41.9 percent of such households—had at least one adult whose job was affected due to losing access to childcare.

This situation includes 2.5 million households that resorted to unpaid leave, 2 million that reduced work hours, 1.3 million that had adults who stopped seeking employment, and over 600,000 households where adults quit their jobs.

“From hospitals to retail to tech, U.S. employers depend on parents being able to work,” stated Nan Wu, director of research at the American Immigration Council. “Removing the workers who make childcare possible would choke off workforce participation and weaken our economy at a time when it’s already struggling.”

For further insights, the full report is available through the American Immigration Council.

California Congressman Dave Min Endorses Indian-American Dr. Tina Shah for NJ’s 7th District

California Congressman Dave Min has endorsed Dr. Tina Shah in her campaign for New Jersey’s 7th Congressional District, emphasizing the need for healthcare reform and accessible care.

California Congressman Dave Min (CA-47) publicly endorsed Dr. Tina Shah on December 11 as she campaigns for New Jersey’s 7th Congressional District. Dr. Shah, a practicing physician, announced her candidacy in July 2025, citing the urgent need to address the broken healthcare system in the United States.

“I’m running for Congress because America is in critical condition and enough is enough,” Dr. Shah stated. “As a physician, I took an oath to first do no harm, but when I go to work in the Intensive Care Unit, I’m up against a system that is designed to make patients broke and sicker, prioritize insurance companies’ profits above all else, and burn out a workforce trying to save lives.”

Dr. Shah, who is triple board-certified in internal medicine, pulmonary medicine, and critical care medicine, grew up in New Jersey. She is challenging Republican incumbent Tom Kean Jr., who has been criticized for casting the deciding vote in Congress for significant cuts to Medicaid.

“Career politicians like Tom Kean Jr. have done nothing to lower healthcare costs or expand access to care,” Dr. Shah remarked. “Instead, he’s dodging his constituents while casting the deciding vote to gut Medicaid and attacking access to essential care, including abortion, in New Jersey.”

The Center for Politics has identified New Jersey’s 7th Congressional District as one of the few “toss-up” races in the country. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has also included Kean Jr. in their 2026 “Districts in Play” list, highlighting the competitive nature of this election.

“I am excited to endorse Dr. Tina Shah for Congress in New Jersey’s 7th District,” Congressman Min said. “Tina’s experience taking care of patients on the frontlines in the ICU and working to deliver affordable and accessible healthcare will serve New Jersey and our whole country well. Like me, she is the child of Asian immigrants, and so she knows firsthand the importance of standing up for our core values and building the economic opportunity that defines the American Dream. She is exactly the kind of fighter we need in Congress right now.”

Dr. Shah expressed her gratitude for Congressman Min’s support, acknowledging his track record of winning tough races and delivering for his community. “I’m excited to flip this seat with his support and join in the work to ensure the American Dream is accessible to all,” she said.

She also voiced concerns regarding the influence of public figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the Trump administration, stating, “They are actively gutting lifesaving medical research and putting vaccine deniers in charge of our vaccine system. If we keep going down this road, there’s only one outcome: people will get hurt. What we do next is critical. I’m running for Congress to fix what is fundamentally broken and stand up for my patients, my neighbors, my community, and New Jersey.”

Dr. Shah’s campaign is gaining momentum as she seeks to address the pressing healthcare issues facing her constituents and the nation.

According to India Currents, the endorsement from Congressman Min underscores the significance of Dr. Shah’s candidacy in the upcoming election.

Tata-Lockheed Facility in Hyderabad Completes Key Delivery for Super Hercules Aircraft

Lockheed Martin has received the 250th tail component for the C-130J Super Hercules from Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures, highlighting a significant milestone in the India-US aerospace partnership.

Lockheed Martin, a leading aerospace company based in the United States, has marked a significant milestone in its collaboration with India by taking delivery of the 250th tail component produced by Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited (TLMAL) for the C-130J Super Hercules aircraft. This delivery underscores the growing partnership between the two nations in the aerospace sector.

The component, known as the empennage, includes the complete tail assembly, which consists of both horizontal and vertical stabilizers. These elements are crucial for providing stability and control to the aircraft. The empennage was manufactured at TLMAL’s facility located in Hyderabad and subsequently shipped to Lockheed Martin’s plant in Marietta, Georgia, for integration into the C-130J aircraft.

According to a company release, “The quality, precision, and reliability demonstrated by our Indian partners directly support the C-130J fleet that serves 23 nations around the world for 20 missions ranging from humanitarian aid to special operations. It is a product that is built to deliver and built to last.”

TLMAL is a joint venture established in 2010 between Tata Advanced Systems Limited and Lockheed Martin. The venture plays a vital role in producing assemblies that contribute to the C-130J production line while also supporting India’s “Make in India” initiative. In addition to manufacturing, the two companies collaborate on quality systems and workforce training to enhance operational efficiency.

Rod McLean, Vice President for Air Mobility & Maritime Missions at Lockheed Martin, emphasized the importance of this milestone, stating that it highlights the cooperation with Indian partners and India’s integral role in the company’s supply chain.

The global C-130J fleet, which is utilized as a tactical airlifter, is operated by 23 countries, including the Indian Air Force. Collectively, these aircraft have logged over 3 million flight hours across various missions, including transport, rescue, refueling, medical evacuation, and humanitarian operations.

In a related development, a report released earlier this month projected that India’s defense technology market, currently valued at $7.6 billion in 2025, is expected to reach $19 billion by 2030. This growth represents a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 20 percent. The report indicates that technology-led systems will comprise almost 50 percent of India’s overall defense market by 2030, signifying a shift from traditional platform-driven development to advanced engineering and digital capability building.

This milestone delivery not only reflects the successful collaboration between Tata and Lockheed Martin but also highlights the evolving landscape of the defense sector in India, where partnerships with global leaders are paving the way for enhanced capabilities and technological advancements.

According to IANS, the emphasis on quality and collaboration in this venture is expected to further strengthen the India-US aerospace partnership.

Pickleball Player Dies After Falling from Third Story While Retrieving Ball

A tragic incident in Malaysia resulted in the death of a 32-year-old pickleball player who fell three stories while attempting to retrieve a ball during a game.

A devastating accident occurred at a pickleball facility in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, where a 32-year-old player fell to his death after climbing over a safety rail to retrieve a ball. The incident took place on December 2, and CCTV footage obtained by Newsflare captured the harrowing moment.

The video shows the player leaping over the safety rail and landing on mesh netting that covered an open gap. Unfortunately, the netting could not support his weight, leading to a fatal three-story plunge. Other players quickly rushed to the railing and descended to the first floor, where they discovered that he had died.

According to Mohamad Lazim Ismail, the Wangsa Maju district police chief, the player was engaged in a game on the third floor when he climbed over the court’s fence to retrieve the ball. “The case has been classified as sudden death,” Ismail stated.

Officials at the Playa Racquet Club, where the tragic incident occurred, expressed their condolences to the victim’s family and friends. “We are deeply saddened by a tragic incident that occurred at our TREC facility, which resulted in the loss of a life,” club officials said in a statement. They also requested understanding and compassion as they respect the privacy of those affected.

The club urged the public to refrain from speculation while the appropriate authorities conduct their investigation.

Pickleball, a sport that combines elements of tennis, badminton, and ping-pong, was invented in 1965 by three fathers seeking a fun family activity. Joel Pritchard, Bill Bell, and Barney McCallum created the game on Bainbridge Island, near Seattle, using ping-pong paddles to volley a perforated plastic ball over a net.

This tragic incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of safety measures in sports facilities. As investigations continue, the community mourns the loss of a player who brought joy to the game.

According to Newsflare, the investigation into the incident is ongoing.

Testimony Highlights Concerns Over Immigration Enforcement and Citizen Rights

Senior Fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick testified before Congress on the alarming rise of wrongful arrests by ICE, highlighting the urgent need for reform to protect citizens’ rights.

Senior Fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick recently delivered oral testimony before Congress, shedding light on the troubling increase in “at-large” arrests conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). His testimony addressed the issues of profiling, wrongful detentions of U.S. citizens, and the pressing need for congressional reform.

Reichlin-Melnick emphasized that the rapid expansion of ICE’s “at-large” arrests is not limited to noncitizens. He noted a significant rise in the number of arrests involving individuals who have no criminal record. This trend raises serious concerns about the methods employed by ICE and the implications for civil liberties.

Among the aggressive enforcement tactics discussed were collateral arrests, roving patrols, and worksite raids. These methods have led to an increase in wrongful detentions, where U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents are mistakenly apprehended due to appearance-based profiling. Such practices not only violate individual rights but also contribute to a growing mistrust between immigrant communities and law enforcement agencies.

Reichlin-Melnick pointed out the public safety risks associated with prioritizing immigration arrests over other federal law enforcement needs. He argued that this focus diverts resources and attention away from addressing more pressing criminal activities, ultimately making communities less safe for everyone.

The testimony underscored the urgent need for Congress to take action to restrict ICE’s overreach. Proposed reforms include requiring clear officer identification during arrests and prohibiting profiling based on appearance. Without legislative intervention, the current trajectory of immigration enforcement threatens to irreparably damage the social fabric of immigrant and mixed-status communities across the nation.

As the landscape of immigration enforcement continues to evolve, the implications for civil rights and community safety remain critical. The call for reform is not just about protecting noncitizens; it is about safeguarding the rights of all individuals within the United States.

According to American Immigration Council, the expansion of ICE’s enforcement tactics poses a significant threat to civil liberties and community trust in law enforcement.

International Indian Icon Season 9 Celebrates Talent in Chicago

The 3iii Talent Foundation concluded its ninth season of the INTERNATIONAL INDIAN ICON (3iii) in Chicago, celebrating a diverse array of global talent from November 28 to 30, 2025.

The 3iii Talent Foundation has officially wrapped up the INTERNATIONAL INDIAN ICON (3iii) Season-9, marking its most ambitious and globally diverse edition to date. Held from November 28 to 30, 2025, at The Matrix Club in Naperville, Illinois, this three-day extravaganza brought together exceptional performers from around the world, reaffirming 3iii’s mission to elevate Indian arts and culture on a truly international stage.

Season-9 achieved a historic milestone with over 10,000 registrations from 39 countries across North America, Europe, Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Australia. A comprehensive global audition process—spanning online uploads and live virtual rounds—culminated in 150 semifinalists advancing to the Chicago episode production. Their passion, discipline, and artistic refinement shaped one of the most memorable seasons in 3iii history.

The three-day on-site production unfolded as a dynamic blend of film-level execution, live performances, celebrity engagement, and red-carpet glamour. Legendary Bollywood composer Jatin Pandit served as the Grand Master for Season-9, alongside an expert judging panel that represented various fields, including singing, dancing, fashion, acting, instrumental performance, and multi-format talent.

Key judges for the event included Haley Bhardwaj, Dance Judge and Director of Simantikos Dance Academy; Rami Mital, Fashion Category Judge and Miss Universe USA & Mrs. Illinois Bharat 2026; and several others who contributed their expertise to the competition. Anchors Sonia Keshwani, Raahul Jatin, and Ajai Kumar infused charisma and vibrancy throughout the event.

A hallmark of the 3iii platform is its inclusivity, open to all ages, cultures, genders, and nationalities. Participants competed in various categories, including Singing, Dancing, Acting, Instruments, Fashion, Comedy, and IGT (I-Got-Talent). Non-Indian participants showcased exceptional artistry by weaving Indian culture into their performances through language, attire, choreography, or musical traditions.

The success of Season-9 reflects the guidance and strategic direction of the 3iii Talent Foundation’s Board of Directors, including Sharan Walia (Founder & CEO), Brij Sharma, Yogi Bharadwaj, Dileep Shrivastava, Swetalina Ahuja, Dr. Hitesh Bhatt, Vinni Walia, Ishita Walia, and Palak Walia. Their combined expertise in business, media, technology, and community leadership helped deliver a spectacular global event.

Founder and CEO Sharan Walia, supported by core team members Rahul Kundu, Naresh Shastri, and Damini Datta, continues to drive the vision of creating the world’s first fully global non-profit talent platform.

The 2025 edition was further elevated by renowned sponsors, including Darshan Dhaliwal, Director of Dhaliwal Enterprises, who served as the Chief Guest of Honor; Sunil Bhatia, Director of MyFashion.com, who supported the Fashion Category; and Rami Mital, Director of Ark Medical Revenue Management, who was a key contributor. Other notable sponsors included Brij Sharma of Power Volt Group & Power Gen AI LLC, RJ Anya Ahuja of Anya International, Rajat Sahani of Shimla Peppers, Sunny Shah of Holiday Inn, and Pratibha Phadke of A3P Connections.

Their collective support strengthened the platform and expanded its global resonance.

The official results for the INTERNATIONAL INDIAN ICON (3iii) Season-9 are as follows:

Singing — Junior Category

Winner: Nitika Pande (USA)

1st Runner-Up: Mishka Kacholiya (USA)

2nd Runner-Up (tie): Tharani Somanathan (UK), Rayyan Ariff (UK)

Judges’ Choice: Saanvi Chandna (USA), Renia Ganguly (UK), Prasheeta Mohanty (USA), Sahithi Yalamanchli (Canada)

Singing — Senior Category

Winner: Razin Syed (USA)

1st Runner-Up: Zain Baig (USA)

2nd Runner-Up: Luoyi Pan (USA)

Judges’ Choice: Ranjita Roy (USA), Caren Mempin (USA), Arwyn Anish (UK), Soumya Mahapatra (UK), Shayan Mukherjee (USA)

Singing — Super Senior Category

Winner: Raj Kewalramani (USA)

1st Runner-Up: Murali M. Collur (USA)

2nd Runner-Up: Saigeetha Matta (USA)

Judges’ Choice: Bhavvika Merchant (USA), Rekha Mahbubani (USA), Kuldeep Sethi (USA), Jayanta Mukherjee (USA)

Dancing — Junior Category

Winner: Thejolakshmi Achari (USA)

1st Runner-Up: Little Angels (USA)

2nd Runner-Up (tie): Saanvi Panda (USA), Jaanvi Venkatesan (USA)

Judges’ Choice: Classical Rhythms Dance Academy (USA), Sunshine Reynoldsburg Dance Group (USA), Reet Jain Parakh (USA), Sataakshi Joshi (USA)

Dancing — Senior & Super Senior

Senior Winner: Classical Rhythms Dance Academy (USA)

Senior 1st Runner-Up: Dance Den Senior (USA)

Senior 2nd Runner-Up (tie): Ritu Jain (USA), Abhilasha Chawdhary Saxena (USA)

Super Senior Winner: Asha Mehta (USA)

IGT — Junior Category

Winner: Sai Khusheel Krishna Bayya (USA)

1st Runner-Up: Sabarish Rajagopal (USA)

2nd Runner-Up: Avismit Bhattacharya (USA)

Judges’ Choice: Shrihaan Mukherjee (USA)

IGT — Senior & Super Senior

Senior Winner: Dinesh Sunar (USA) — for an extraordinary Parkour act

Super Senior Judges’ Choice: Cris M. (USA), Rekha Mahbubani (USA)

Looking ahead, the 3iii Talent Foundation extends warm congratulations to all participants who made Season-9 a monumental celebration of global Indian talent. Registrations for Season-10 (2026) will open in March, with State and Country-level competitions running through November 2026. Details of the Grand Finale will be announced soon as 3iii continues its mission to expand worldwide and champion Indian arts across borders, according to Global Net News.

Indian-American Candidate Rishi Kumar Faces Scrutiny Over Campaign Ideas

Santa Clara County assessor candidate Rishi Kumar’s proposal to exempt older adults from property taxes is stirring debate as he faces a runoff election against Neysa Fligor.

Rishi Kumar, a candidate for Santa Clara County assessor, is generating significant attention—and some controversy—with his pledge to shield older adults from property taxes. This ambitious proposal has drawn both support and criticism as Kumar prepares for a runoff election scheduled for December 30.

The special election was prompted by the abrupt resignation of Larry Stone, the county’s former assessor who held the position for 30 years. Kumar, a former councilmember from Saratoga, is competing against Neysa Fligor, the Vice Mayor of Los Altos and an assistant assessor, who secured 37% of the vote in the initial election on November 4, falling short of the outright majority needed to avoid a runoff.

Kumar’s campaign centers on a bold initiative to exempt residents aged 60 and older from property taxes on assessed properties. In response to pushback from established political figures who have labeled the proposal as illegal, Kumar clarified that he intends to advocate for a statewide ballot measure to enact this change.

The proposal aims to amend Proposition 13, a landmark law passed by voters in 1978 that limits annual increases in property assessments to a maximum of 2% until a property is reassessed due to new construction or a change of ownership. Kumar has already submitted the necessary ballot language to the state Attorney General’s Office.

“All sorts of allegations keep flying at my campaign as a result of this proposal,” Kumar told San José Spotlight. “People have basically said, ‘You don’t have the authority,’ or ‘You’re lying’ or ‘You would be misusing the authority of the office.’”

One of Kumar’s critics is his potential predecessor, Larry Stone, who expressed strong disapproval of the proposal. “I told him flat out to his face that that was illegal and somebody running for assessor should not be promising things that are illegal,” Stone stated. He argues that anyone can advocate for a ballot measure, regardless of whether they hold the office of assessor, and that Kumar’s claims of needing the position to push for such a measure are unfounded.

Kumar counters that, as assessor, he would have a unique platform to advocate for the proposed law change. “I don’t know why it was so alarming to my opponents,” he remarked.

To bolster his case, Kumar points to Virginia, which in 2010 passed a constitutional amendment allowing local governments to exempt or defer property taxes for certain older adults and disabled residents. He also highlights recent actions in Alameda County, where Assessor Phong La committed to reducing tax bills for over 8,300 homeowners whose property values had dropped significantly.

However, experts caution that if Kumar is elected, he would face the challenge of balancing his campaign for the tax measure with the administrative responsibilities of the assessor’s office. Darien Shansky, a state tax law expert and professor at UC Davis, noted, “You would need to get around 900,000 signatures for the ballot measure and run a statewide campaign. It would be a very major undertaking.”

The debate surrounding Kumar’s proposal has sparked broader discussions about the role of the assessor’s office. Stone argues that the position should remain apolitical, emphasizing that fair market value should be determined without political influence. “The job of the assessor is totally different from any other elected official,” he stated. “Anything I do from day one has nothing to do with politics whatsoever.”

Kumar, however, believes that the role inherently involves political responsibility. “If it was not a political role, you would be appointed,” he said. “Anyone who is in an elected leadership role should create policies. That’s what the people expect.”

His interest in advocating for older adults stems from his experience fundraising for senior services in Saratoga, as well as from his unsuccessful campaign for Congressional District 16 in 2024, which ultimately led to the election of former San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo. “Many seniors struggle once you don’t have a source of income. They’re trying to survive,” Kumar explained. “We have received hundreds of emails and messages back to us—thousands—who say, ‘My god this will make a big difference to me.’”

The Libertarian Party of Santa Clara County has expressed a degree of support for Kumar’s proposal, with Party Chairman Joe Dehn stating, “Although the Libertarian Party of Santa Clara County has not made an endorsement in this race, we are glad to see one local politician campaigning on actually reducing the tax burden on some of his constituents, instead of the same old story of how government needs more and more.”

Kumar has assured voters that his plan would not compromise funding for essential services such as schools, libraries, and parks. He argues that local governments should focus on reducing wasteful spending rather than increasing tax rates to cover rising costs.

Stone, however, contends that older adults are among the least in need of property tax exemptions due to the protections already afforded by Proposition 13. “Seniors have the best property taxes of anybody,” he said. “The people that need property tax reductions the most in this valley are not senior citizens. This proposal is a sham.”

While the Santa Clara County Republican Party has welcomed the idea in principle, Party Chair Dave Johnson remains skeptical about its feasibility. “This scheme may help him become the assessor, as it is a popular idea,” Johnson remarked. “But— and it’s a big but—what if the state says no?”

This article was first published in San José Spotlight.

Sharanjit Thind Announces Congressional Bid for New York’s 18th District

Sharanjit Singh Thind has announced his candidacy for the U.S. House of Representatives, aiming to represent New York’s 18th District in the 2026 elections.

Sharanjit Singh Thind officially filed his candidacy in September 2025 for the U.S. House of Representatives, seeking to represent New York’s 18th District in the Hudson Valley. A lifelong Republican and Sikh originally from Punjab, India, Thind is confident that this Democrat-held seat is primed for a change. With extensive experience in both the private and public sectors, his campaign emphasizes promoting business, creating jobs that are resilient to automation, defending family values, and enhancing community safety.

Thind claims to have the backing of the Republican establishment. Prior to submitting his nomination papers, he met with Ed Cox, Chairman of the New York Republican State Committee, to discuss support for his campaign. Thind was informed that there were no other Republican candidates in the race, making the 18th Congressional District a promising opportunity for him. “Even with the best intentions and backing of the party leadership, primaries are unavoidable and even healthy,” he noted.

Describing his familiarity with CD-18, Thind emphasized his close connections with local party leadership, facilitated by Chairman Cox. “I am receiving a very enthusiastic response when I interact with constituents from all backgrounds,” he added.

While acknowledging that the incumbent, Patrick Ryan, defeated Alison Esposito (R) by 14 points in the 2024 election, Thind believes the political landscape has shifted in his favor. He cites growing discontent among voters regarding the handling of illegal immigration, particularly under President Biden and Mayor Adams. “People are fed up seeing hotels and motels teeming with illegal migrants housed in the Hudson Valley. Under President Trump, that threat to law and order has been cleared,” he stated.

Thind expressed concern over the recent election of Zohran Mamdani as Mayor of New York City, contrasting it with Trump’s America First, pro-business policies. He argues that these policies have contributed to making America the world’s largest economy and a destination for global talent. “By putting business first, you have to know about business, which I do, having run media and real estate businesses,” he said.

Thind’s campaign platform addresses several key issues. He identifies the rise of artificial intelligence as a significant challenge, stating, “Many jobs will evaporate under the AI heat. I am not against AI or automation, but I will hold AI companies accountable to ensure they reinvest some of their profits into retraining displaced workers.” He also emphasizes the need for accountability among banks regarding financial scams that adversely affect seniors.

In addition to job creation, Thind plans to promote tourism in the scenic Hudson Valley. “I will give tourism full attention to attract high-paying visitors and create jobs,” he stated, referencing a recent Netflix series, ‘Four Seasons,’ filmed in the area and featuring stars like Steve Carell and Tina Fey. With his business expertise and the region’s appeal, he is optimistic about attracting more entertainment projects.

Thind arrived in the United States equipped with an MBA and a journalism degree. He resides on Long Island with his wife and two sons. Over the years, he has worked for various reputable companies, founded his own advertising agency in Manhattan, and served as the Editor-Publisher of ‘The South Asian Insider’ for nearly two decades. Recently, he authored “The Beginning – Mad Men of Nu Way Advertising,” which highlights his experiences in the advertising industry on Madison Avenue.

His campaign promises include creating more jobs, protecting those jobs from the impacts of AI, boosting tourism in the Hudson Valley, expanding healthcare benefits, upholding family values, and enacting laws to safeguard seniors from scams.

Thind also brings a wealth of experience in government and politics. Since 2012, he has served as a Commissioner on the Nassau County Human Rights Commission until 2018 and has worked with the Receiver of Taxes office in the Town of Hempstead, the largest township in America.

Having been actively involved in electoral politics, Thind has helped various candidates run for office, from local council members to congressional races. “I have been very closely involved, spending long hours strategizing policy. I have helped raise and personally contributed to the campaigns of quite a few races,” he explained. He has also received the Congressional Excellence Award for his contributions.

Thind plans to leverage his editorial experience to inform his approach to governance and address the issues he believes need fixing in his campaign for Congress.

According to India Currents, Thind’s candidacy marks a significant step in his political journey as he seeks to represent the interests of the Hudson Valley community.

Jay Vaingankar Raises $126,000 on First Day of Congressional Campaign

Democratic congressional candidate Jay Vaingankar raised over $126,000 within the first 24 hours of his campaign launch for New Jersey’s 12th Congressional District, with significant support from young voters.

WEST WINDSOR, NJ – On December 9, Democratic congressional candidate Jay Vaingankar announced that he had raised more than $126,000 in the first 24 hours following the launch of his campaign for Congress in New Jersey’s 12th Congressional District.

The impressive fundraising total came from over 200 individual donors, with more than half of the contributions originating from individuals under the age of 30. Vaingankar noted that donations were received from every county within the district, showcasing a broad base of support.

“I’m grateful for the backing of so many grassroots supporters, especially young people,” Vaingankar stated. “Their enthusiasm allows our campaign to focus on the voters of Central Jersey – and not special interests.”

Vaingankar, who was born and raised in the district, emphasized his commitment to the community, stating, “I took the train home to Jersey every other weekend while serving in the federal government. I’m ready to fight for our community to tackle rising costs, create jobs, and stand up to the Trump Administration.”

His background in Mercer County instilled in him a strong work ethic and a deep respect for diversity. Vaingankar previously worked in the Biden administration’s Department of Energy, where he played a key role in implementing millions of dollars in federal clean energy tax credits for New Jersey. He is the only candidate in the race with federal experience.

Campaign manager Devontae Freeland expressed optimism about the campaign’s early success, stating, “This early momentum gives us the resources we need to organize in every corner of the district and make sure Jay’s message reaches every voter.”

As the campaign progresses, Vaingankar’s ability to connect with younger voters and leverage his federal experience may prove crucial in the competitive landscape of New Jersey’s 12th Congressional District.

According to India-West, the strong initial fundraising effort reflects a growing enthusiasm for Vaingankar’s candidacy and his vision for the future of the community.

Democrats Focus on Vulnerable Republican Senators Before Health Care Vote

The Democratic National Committee is launching an ad campaign targeting four vulnerable Republican senators ahead of crucial Senate votes on Affordable Care Act tax credits that impact over 20 million Americans.

As the Senate prepares for critical votes on competing health care tax credit measures, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) is rolling out a new advertising campaign aimed at four Republican senators deemed vulnerable in their re-election bids next year.

The campaign, which was first shared with Fox News Digital, specifically targets Senators Susan Collins of Maine, John Cornyn of Texas, Jon Husted of Ohio, and Dan Sullivan of Alaska. The DNC criticizes these senators for their repeated votes against extending enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) premium tax credits, which could lead to significant increases in health care premiums for millions of Americans.

To reach voters, the DNC is employing digital takeovers of local newspapers in the states represented by these senators, along with additional digital advertisements. The campaign also highlights Republican Senators Ted Cruz of Texas, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Bernie Moreno of Ohio.

Currently, over 20 million Americans depend on these tax credits to make their health insurance more affordable under the ACA, commonly referred to as Obamacare. The Democratic Party has consistently emphasized the importance of health care costs and the impending expiration of these tax credits as part of their broader strategy to advocate for affordability. This messaging has proven effective, contributing to significant victories in recent elections.

DNC Chair Ken Martin emphasized the stakes involved in the Senate vote, stating, “Today’s Senate vote to extend the ACA tax credits could be the difference between life and death for many Americans. Over 20 million Americans will see their health care premiums skyrocket next year if Susan Collins, John Cornyn, Jon Husted, and Dan Sullivan do not stand with working families and vote to extend these lifesaving credits.”

Despite the urgency, neither of the competing proposals regarding Obamacare is expected to pass. Senate Democrats, led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, argue that their plan to extend the enhanced ACA premium credit subsidies is the most effective way to prevent a surge in health care premiums on the exchange.

On the other hand, Senate Republicans are resistant to extending these subsidies without reforms. They argue that the current program primarily benefits insurance companies rather than individuals utilizing the marketplace and that the enhanced credits are susceptible to fraud and abuse.

Earlier this week, Senate Republicans reached a consensus on a proposal from Senators Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and Mike Crapo of Idaho, who chair the Senate health and finance panels. This plan suggests completely abandoning the enhanced credits in favor of health savings accounts (HSAs), which would be seeded with amounts ranging from $1,000 to $1,500 based on age, among other adjustments favored by the GOP.

However, the Cassidy and Crapo proposal is just one of several options being considered by Republicans. Collins has also put forth a plan, in collaboration with Moreno, that has garnered interest from some Senate Democrats. This proposal would extend the subsidies for an additional two years while implementing income caps at $200,000 per household and eliminating zero-cost premiums to prevent fraud.

Husted has proposed a similar extension of the subsidies for two years, which also includes income caps and the elimination of zero-cost premiums. However, his plan incorporates stricter enforcement of the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits taxpayer funding for abortions, a stipulation that Senate Democrats are unlikely to accept.

The likelihood of any proposals being acted upon in the Senate before the deadline remains uncertain, particularly as next week will be dominated by the annual defense bill and the consideration of President Donald Trump’s nominees.

The DNC’s digital ad campaign is making its presence felt in several key local publications, including the Bangor Daily News in Maine, the San Antonio Express-News and San Antonio Current in Texas, the Cleveland Plain Dealer and Medina Gazette in Ohio, and the Anchorage Daily News in Alaska, aiming to sway public opinion ahead of the Senate votes.

According to Fox News, the DNC’s targeted approach reflects the party’s commitment to addressing health care affordability and its potential impact on millions of Americans.

Venezuelan Opposition Leader Machado Resurfaces in Norway After Months of Hiding

Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado made her first public appearance in Norway after 11 months in hiding, as her daughter accepted the Nobel Peace Prize on her behalf.

María Corina Machado, a prominent Venezuelan opposition leader, re-emerged in public on Thursday in Oslo, Norway, after spending 11 months in hiding. Her appearance coincided with her daughter accepting the Nobel Peace Prize on her behalf, a significant recognition for Machado’s efforts against the government of President Nicolás Maduro.

Machado had been in hiding since January 9, when she was briefly detained after participating in a demonstration in Caracas, the capital of Venezuela. Her public recognition comes as a result of her peaceful challenge to Maduro’s regime, which has faced widespread criticism for its authoritarian practices.

As Machado stepped onto the balcony of a hotel in Oslo, she was greeted by a crowd chanting “Freedom!” She waved to her supporters and joined them in singing the national anthem of Venezuela. In an audio recording shared on the Nobel website, Machado expressed her gratitude for the efforts made to bring her to the ceremony, acknowledging that many had “risked their lives” for her cause.

“I am very grateful to them, and this is a measure of what this recognition means to the Venezuelan people,” she stated.

In her absence, Machado’s daughter, Ana Corina Sosa, accepted the Nobel Prize, emphasizing her mother’s unwavering desire for a free Venezuela. “She will never give up on that purpose,” Sosa declared, adding, “That is why we all know, and I know, that she will be back in Venezuela very soon.”

Outside the hotel, Machado interacted with supporters, embracing them as they took photographs and chanted “President! President!” She responded to the crowd, saying, “I want you all back in Venezuela.”

Machado’s appearance in Norway came shortly after U.S. President Donald Trump announced that the United States had seized a Venezuelan oil tanker. This action is likely to exacerbate tensions between the U.S. and Maduro’s government, which is already facing extensive sanctions targeting its oil sector.

Since September, U.S. military operations have reportedly targeted alleged narcotraffickers near Venezuela, with at least 22 strikes resulting in the deaths of 87 individuals. Trump has also indicated that Maduro’s “days are numbered” and has not ruled out the possibility of a ground operation in Venezuela.

Steve Yates, a senior research fellow for China and national security policy at The Heritage Foundation, commented on “Fox News @ Night” that Machado’s visit to Norway presents an opportunity to garner “greater international support” for her cause. He noted that Trump might benefit from having more European allies endorse a “non-invasion” approach to the situation in Venezuela.

Machado has been a vocal supporter of the Trump administration’s actions against Maduro’s regime and the narcotrafficking network in the country. Following the announcement of her Nobel Peace Prize win in October, she dedicated the award to both Trump and the “suffering people of Venezuela.”

In a recent interview on “Fox & Friends Weekend,” Machado described Venezuela as being on the “threshold of freedom,” highlighting her new “freedom manifesto,” which envisions a future without the Maduro regime.

Her reappearance in Norway marks a pivotal moment for Machado and the Venezuelan opposition, as they continue to seek international support in their struggle for democracy and human rights in Venezuela, according to Fox News.

Trump Introduces ‘Gold Card’ Program for U.S. Residency at $1 Million

The new Gold Card program, launched by President Trump, offers U.S. residency for $1 million, replacing the EB-5 visa with no job-creation requirements or annual caps on applicants.

President Donald Trump has officially launched the much-anticipated Gold Card program, which aims to provide U.S. permanent residency and a pathway to citizenship for foreign investors. The initiative was unveiled on Wednesday and is designed to attract global talent by allowing individuals to secure residency through a $1 million investment. Corporations can obtain residency for foreign-born employees at a cost of $2 million per employee.

The Gold Card program replaces the EB-5 visa, a long-established investor visa introduced by Congress in 1990. Under the EB-5 program, individuals could qualify for U.S. residency by investing approximately $1 million in a business that created at least 10 American jobs. However, the new Gold Card initiative eliminates the job-creation requirement and appears to lack an annual cap on the number of applicants, distinguishing it from its predecessor.

In his announcement, Trump described the Gold Card as “basically, it’s a green card but much better. Much more powerful, a much stronger path.” He emphasized that the program is designed not only to attract foreign investment but also to retain top global talent, which he believes is essential for the growth of American companies.

The launch of the Gold Card program comes after months of promotion by the president, who initially proposed a $5 million price tag for the residency card before settling on the current structure. Trump expressed enthusiasm for the program on social media, stating, “A direct path to Citizenship for all qualified and vetted people. SO EXCITING! Our Great American Companies can finally keep their invaluable Talent.”

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick provided additional details about the program, noting that there will be a $15,000 vetting fee for each applicant. He assured the public that rigorous background checks would be conducted to ensure that applicants meet the necessary qualifications to reside in the United States. Companies will have the option to apply for multiple Gold Cards; however, each card will be limited to one individual.

The introduction of the Gold Card program marks a significant shift in U.S. immigration policy, aiming to streamline the process for wealthy investors while potentially increasing federal revenue. As the application website goes live, it remains to be seen how this initiative will impact the landscape of U.S. immigration and foreign investment.

For further information on the Gold Card program and its implications, please refer to The American Bazaar.

Birthright Citizenship: Legal Precedent and Limits of Executive Action

The Supreme Court is set to review the Trump administration’s Executive Order 14160, which challenges the longstanding constitutional principle of birthright citizenship in the United States.

The Supreme Court’s decision to review the Trump administration’s effort to revive Executive Order 14160 has thrust the issue of birthright citizenship into the national spotlight. This constitutional protection, enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment, has been a cornerstone of American law since its ratification in 1868.

Supporters of the executive order argue that it represents a necessary correction to what they perceive as an overly lenient citizenship system. However, a thorough examination of constitutional and historical precedents reveals a clear truth: no president possesses the authority to alter the Fourteenth Amendment through executive action.

The Constitution explicitly outlines the process for amending its text, and presidential action is not included in that framework. Justice Samuel Chase articulated this principle as far back as 1798, stating, “the President has nothing to do with the proposition, or adoption, of amendments to the Constitution.” This foundational concept remains pivotal in the current debate surrounding birthright citizenship.

The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” The language is intentionally broad, crafted to counteract the effects of the notorious 1857 Dred Scott decision, which denied citizenship to Black Americans. The Amendment was designed to ensure that no group residing on American soil could be relegated to a permanent underclass.

The principle of birthright citizenship, known as jus soli (citizenship by birthplace), has deep roots in English common law and was adopted by early American states. Congress further solidified the Amendment’s guarantees through legislation in 1940 and 1952. For over 150 years, administrations from both major political parties have treated birthright citizenship as a constitutional rule rather than a policy subject to presidential discretion.

The administration’s argument relies on a narrow interpretation of the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction.” However, the Supreme Court has already decisively rejected this interpretation. In the landmark case United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), the Court affirmed that the Fourteenth Amendment enshrined the common-law principle of jus soli. The only exceptions to automatic citizenship are limited to children of foreign diplomats, children born to occupying enemy forces, and certain individuals not subject to American law.

Importantly, immigration status—whether undocumented or on a temporary visa—has never been included among these exceptions. Undocumented immigrants are indeed subject to U.S. law; they can be taxed, arrested, prosecuted, and deported. Harvard Law scholar Gerald Neuman has characterized the administration’s interpretation as “either a crazy theory or a dishonest interpretation of the Constitution.”

Executive Order 14160 is constitutionally flawed because it attempts to condition birthright citizenship on the legal status of a child’s parents—an alteration that could only be achieved through a constitutional amendment. Even if the order were to apply solely to future births, the fundamental issue remains unchanged: the executive branch lacks the authority to redefine constitutional membership.

The Amendment was specifically designed to prevent citizenship from becoming a political tool manipulated by changing administrations. Allowing a president to unilaterally modify it would undermine the separation of powers and destabilize the constitutional guarantees that have endured for over a century.

Federal courts recognized the order’s constitutional conflicts almost immediately. A district court blocked the order shortly after its announcement, citing its clear contradiction with established constitutional text and precedent.

The Supreme Court’s upcoming review will not only clarify who qualifies as an American citizen but will also address the critical question of whether a president can rewrite a constitutional promise that has stood firm for generations. The implications of this case extend far beyond the immediate issue of citizenship, touching on the very foundations of American democracy and the rule of law.

As the nation awaits the Court’s decision, the future of birthright citizenship hangs in the balance, reminding us of the enduring importance of constitutional protections in safeguarding the rights of all individuals within the United States, according to Global Net News.

Florida CAIR Considers Lawsuit Against DeSantis Over Terrorist Label

CAIR Florida plans to sue Governor Ron DeSantis after he labeled the organization a “foreign terrorist group” in an executive order, igniting a legal and political controversy.

The Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has announced its intention to file a lawsuit against Governor Ron DeSantis following his recent executive order that designates the Muslim civil rights organization as a “foreign terrorist organization.”

During a news conference, Hiba Rahim, the deputy executive director of CAIR Florida, described the governor’s order as an attack rooted in conspiracy theories. She drew parallels to historical efforts that targeted various immigrant communities in the United States, including Jewish, Irish, and Italian Americans.

“We are very proud to defend the founding principles of our Constitution, to defend free speech,” Rahim stated. “We are proud to defend democracy, and we are proud to be America first.”

Rahim further asserted that DeSantis’s support for Israel influenced the decision to label CAIR as a terrorist organization, claiming that the group’s activism had caused “discomfort” for the U.S. ally. She emphasized that CAIR does not intend to back down in the face of this designation.

In response, Governor DeSantis defended his executive order, asserting that his administration had sufficient grounds for the designation. He welcomed CAIR’s legal challenge, describing the action as “a long time coming.”

Alongside CAIR, DeSantis’s order also identifies the Muslim Brotherhood as a “foreign terrorist organization.” This move follows a recent executive order from former President Donald Trump, which initiated a federal process to consider designating certain chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood in a similar manner.

DeSantis indicated that he anticipates Florida lawmakers will pursue related legislation when the legislature reconvenes in January, calling the executive order “the beginning” of a broader initiative.

Under DeSantis’s directive, state agencies are prohibited from awarding contracts, employment, or funds to CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood, or any organizations deemed to have materially supported them.

During the Tampa news conference, attorney Miranda Margolis criticized the executive order, arguing that DeSantis had overstepped his authority by unilaterally designating a nonprofit organization as a terrorist group.

“This designation is without legal or factual basis and constitutes a dangerous escalation of anti-Muslim political rhetoric,” Margolis stated.

Florida’s decision follows a similar proclamation made by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, which has also faced legal challenges from CAIR. The organization argues that Abbott’s designation violates both the U.S. Constitution and Texas law. Muslim and interfaith organizations in Texas have urged Abbott to rescind his order.

It is important to note that state-level designations do not carry the same legal weight as federal Foreign Terrorist Organization classifications, which can only be issued by the U.S. State Department.

CAIR contends that the Florida executive order infringes upon its First Amendment rights and due-process protections, asserting that terrorism designations should fall under federal jurisdiction rather than state power.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

US Deploys Fighter Jets to Gulf of Venezuela Amid Rising Tensions

Two U.S. fighter jets conducted a training flight over the Gulf of Venezuela, marking a significant increase in military activity in the region amid rising tensions.

On Tuesday, the United States deployed two fighter jets over the Gulf of Venezuela, marking what is believed to be the closest known approach of U.S. military aircraft to Venezuelan airspace to date. The F/A-18 jets were tracked on Flightradar24 as they conducted a 30-minute flight over waters north of Venezuela, according to reports from the Associated Press.

A U.S. defense official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, described the mission as a “routine training flight” aimed at showcasing the operational reach of the aircraft. The official did not disclose whether the jets were armed but emphasized that the operation was conducted entirely within international airspace.

This dual flight comes amid a backdrop of increased U.S. military activity in the region over the past several months. While the U.S. has previously deployed B-52 Stratofortress and B-1 Lancer bombers along Venezuela’s coastline, the recent F/A-18 mission represents a closer approach than those earlier operations.

The uptick in military activity began following U.S. strikes on vessels suspected of drug smuggling in both the Caribbean Sea and the eastern Pacific. The first reported U.S. military strike on a vessel allegedly departing from Venezuela with drugs occurred in September. The Trump administration characterized these operations as crucial for combating illicit drug trafficking, a claim that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has consistently denied.

In November, tensions surrounding Venezuelan airspace escalated when President Trump instructed airlines to treat the region as effectively closed, aligning with warnings from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to civilian carriers.

Retired Rear Admiral Mark Montgomery, senior director at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation, previously stated that Venezuela’s most significant military threats stem from its own air and naval systems. This includes fighter jets, limited surface vessels, and Russian-made surface-to-air missiles.

“Reasonably speaking, in the first day or two of a campaign plan, we can eliminate the air and maritime threat to U.S. forces,” Montgomery noted.

Isaias Medina, an international lawyer and former Venezuelan diplomat, echoed this sentiment, suggesting that Venezuela’s military capabilities appear more formidable on paper than they are in practice.

The recent military maneuvers by the U.S. reflect ongoing concerns about the security dynamics in the region, particularly as tensions between the two nations continue to rise.

According to Fox News Digital, the situation remains fluid, with both military and diplomatic developments likely to influence future interactions in the Gulf of Venezuela.

U.S. Supreme Court to Review Limits on Election Spending

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to reconsider longstanding limits on election spending, potentially reshaping the landscape of campaign finance in the wake of a Republican-led challenge.

Caps on election spending may soon become a relic of the past as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear a case that could overturn a quarter-century-old decision. This challenge, spearheaded by a Republican initiative and supported by the Trump administration, seeks to eliminate restrictions on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates for Congress and the presidency.

In 2001, the Supreme Court upheld a provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) that limited coordinated spending by political parties. In the case of Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee, the Court ruled that these limits were constitutional, arguing that unrestricted coordinated expenditures could bypass contribution limits and jeopardize the integrity of federal elections.

This ruling was grounded in the longstanding authority of Congress to regulate campaign finance, aiming to strike a balance between First Amendment rights and the need to prevent corruption or its appearance in federal elections.

As of 2025, the Supreme Court is revisiting this precedent in the case of National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission (NRSC v. FEC). The plaintiffs contend that the campaign finance landscape has undergone significant changes since 2001, rendering previous limits on coordinated spending overly restrictive of political speech and party activities.

They argue that subsequent rulings, particularly Citizens United v. FEC (2010), which expanded the ability of independent groups to spend on elections, have altered the dynamics of campaign finance. The Court has agreed to hear this case during the 2025–2026 term, indicating a potential reevaluation of the constitutional framework governing party-coordinated expenditures.

Following the Trump administration’s collaboration with Republicans to challenge the campaign finance law, the justices appointed a lawyer to defend the existing limits. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the future of campaign finance in the United States.

If the Court decides to strike down or substantially weaken the limits on coordinated spending, political parties may gain the ability to invest significantly more in support of their candidates. This shift could dramatically alter campaign strategies, fundraising efforts, and the overall dynamics of federal elections.

Conversely, if the Court upholds the limits, it would reaffirm Congress’s authority to regulate coordinated spending and maintain a clear distinction between independent and coordinated expenditures. However, the actual impact of any new ruling on campaign finance behavior remains uncertain, as both political strategies and legal interpretations continue to evolve.

Roman Martinez, a seasoned Supreme Court advocate, has proposed a potential resolution for the justices that would allow them to avoid making a definitive ruling. He suggests that the case should be deemed moot, given that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) now aligns with Republicans in asserting that the law is unconstitutional and that there is “no credible risk” of enforcement.

This case before the Supreme Court marks a critical juncture in the ongoing evolution of U.S. campaign finance law. At its heart, the dispute encapsulates a fundamental tension between two principles: the need to protect the integrity of federal elections by preventing corruption or its appearance, and the imperative to safeguard political speech, a core First Amendment right.

The 2001 precedent upheld limits on coordinated spending by political parties, emphasizing Congress’s role in regulating elections and maintaining clear boundaries between independent expenditures and party-directed spending. However, the plaintiffs in the current case argue that developments in campaign finance over the past two decades, particularly following landmark rulings like Citizens United, have rendered these limits outdated and unnecessarily restrictive.

The Supreme Court’s decision in this case could redefine the landscape of campaign finance, influencing how elections are funded and conducted in the years to come, according to The American Bazaar.

FTC Upholds Ban on Stalkerware Founder Scott Zuckerman

The Federal Trade Commission has upheld a ban on Scott Zuckerman, founder of the consumer spyware company Support King, following a data breach that compromised customer information.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has denied a request from Scott Zuckerman, the founder of the consumer spyware company Support King and its subsidiaries, SpyFone and OneClickMonitor, to lift a ban preventing him from participating in the surveillance industry. This ban was instituted after a significant data breach exposed sensitive personal information of both customers and those being monitored.

In a press release detailing its decision, the FTC stated that Zuckerman failed to demonstrate any changed circumstances that would warrant reconsideration of the Consent Order issued against him. The Commission voted 2-0 to deny Zuckerman’s petition after reviewing 27 comments submitted regarding the matter.

The FTC’s original order, finalized in late 2021, alleged that Zuckerman and Support King, LLC, which operated under the name SpyFone.com, marketed applications that enabled users to secretly track devices without the knowledge of the device owners. The Commission noted that these applications posed risks by requiring users to disable essential security features and by secretly collecting and disseminating data, including photos, text messages, web histories, and location information.

Samuel Levine, the acting director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection at the time, criticized the operations of SpyFone, stating, “SpyFone is a brazen brand name for a surveillance business that helped stalkers steal private information. The stalkerware was hidden from device owners, but was fully exposed to hackers who exploited the company’s slipshod security.”

In his petition, Zuckerman argued that the security requirements imposed by the FTC made it increasingly difficult for him to manage his other business ventures due to the associated financial burdens. He noted that Support King is no longer operational and that he is currently focused on running a restaurant and exploring tourism opportunities in Puerto Rico.

The controversy surrounding Zuckerman and his companies escalated in 2018 when a security researcher uncovered an Amazon S3 bucket belonging to SpyFone that had left highly sensitive data exposed online. This breach included personal information such as selfies, text messages, audio recordings, and hashed passwords, affecting over 44,000 unique email addresses and revealing data from approximately 3,666 devices that had the SpyFone stalkerware installed.

In 2022, reports surfaced indicating that Zuckerman might have been involved in another stalkerware operation. TechCrunch obtained a cache of breached data from a stalkerware app named SpyTrac, which appeared to be operated by freelance developers with connections to Support King, suggesting an attempt to circumvent the existing ban.

Eva Galperin, a noted expert on stalkerware, expressed her approval of the FTC’s decision to uphold the ban. She remarked, “Mr. Zuckerman was clearly hoping that if he laid low for a few years, everyone would forget about the reasons why the FTC issued a ban not only against the company, but against him specifically.”

The FTC’s actions underscore its commitment to protecting consumers from invasive surveillance practices and holding accountable those who exploit personal data for profit.

For further information, please refer to The American Bazaar.

Why Scammers Open Bank Accounts in Your Name: Understanding the Risks

Criminals are increasingly using stolen identities to open deposit accounts, posing significant risks to victims and complicating responses to identity theft.

Identity theft is evolving, with criminals now employing more sophisticated methods to exploit stolen personal data. One alarming trend is the application for deposit accounts in victims’ names, a tactic that leaves many individuals confused and unsure of how to respond.

Brian, a resident of Clinton, Pennsylvania, recently faced this unsettling reality. He received notifications from two different banks informing him that someone had attempted to open deposit accounts using his identity. Both banks denied the applications and communicated the denials through email and letter, but neither provided any details about the information submitted or the reasons for the denials.

In his correspondence, Brian expressed his frustration: “I understand why fraudsters try to open credit accounts, but why would they try to open deposit accounts? One bank told me they could not share any information with me about the failed application due to privacy policy, and the other bank said they do not save any information from declined applications from non-customers.” He questioned the lack of transparency from banking institutions regarding declined applications and sought guidance on how to respond to these fraudulent attempts.

Deposit account fraud is on the rise as criminals increasingly build synthetic identities and test stolen data. When thieves apply for checking or savings accounts in a victim’s name, they are essentially experimenting to see which identities pass initial verification steps. This information can be critical for planning more damaging attacks in the future.

Criminals often prefer deposit accounts for several strategic reasons. The approval process for these accounts can be less stringent than that for credit accounts, allowing fraudsters to test stolen data without the same level of scrutiny. Additionally, a new deposit account can serve as a means for laundering funds or receiving payments linked to scams, unemployment fraud, or tax refund theft.

Once criminals confirm that a victim’s identity can be successfully used, they may proceed to open credit lines or create a synthetic profile that combines real and fabricated information. Unfortunately, banks are bound by strict privacy regulations under federal law, which limit the information they can disclose about applications, even when identity theft is involved. For instance, while an IP address could potentially help identify a fraudster, banks typically will not share this information without a legal request tied to an active investigation.

To combat the risks associated with deposit account fraud, individuals can take proactive steps to protect their identities. Traditional credit monitoring services may not cover deposit account activity, so it is advisable to utilize services that monitor bank accounts and dark web activity for added protection. Identity theft protection companies can track personal information, such as Social Security numbers, phone numbers, and email addresses, alerting users if their data is being sold on the dark web or used to open unauthorized accounts.

In Brian’s case, he has already placed a one-year fraud alert with the credit bureaus, but he may want to consider upgrading to a seven-year alert. Additionally, freezing his credit with Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion can prevent new credit lines from being opened in his name.

Another effective measure is to utilize a data removal service, which can help scrub personal details from people search sites that criminals often exploit to build synthetic identities. While no service can guarantee complete removal of personal data from the internet, these companies actively monitor and erase information from numerous websites, significantly reducing the risk of future identity theft.

Individuals should also monitor deposit account activity by requesting reports from services like ChexSystems and Early Warning Services. It is essential to look for unauthorized entries and consider adding security alerts or freezes to these accounts as well.

Even if banks cannot share specific details about fraudulent attempts, it is advisable to request documentation of these incidents to flag future attempts. Victims should remain vigilant for unexpected debit cards, 1099 forms, or bank statements, as these may indicate that criminals have succeeded elsewhere.

In summary, deposit account fraud operates outside traditional credit systems, making it particularly confusing for victims. However, understanding the motivations behind these fraudulent activities and taking swift action can help individuals regain control of their identities and mitigate the risks associated with identity theft.

For further information and tips on protecting yourself from identity theft, visit CyberGuy.com.

25 Dead in Goa Nightclub Fire; Fireworks Likely Cause

At least 25 people lost their lives in a devastating fire at a nightclub in North Goa, with initial investigations suggesting that indoor fireworks may have sparked the blaze.

NEW DELHI — A tragic fire at a popular nightclub in North Goa’s Arpora has claimed the lives of at least 25 individuals, marking one of the deadliest incidents of its kind in the region in recent years. The fire broke out around midnight on December 6 at Birch by Romeo Lane, a busy venue located in the Baga-Arpora area.

Initially, authorities suspected that a cylinder blast might have caused the blaze. However, further investigations have shifted the focus toward the possibility that indoor pyrotechnics ignited the fire, a theory also reported by the BBC.

At the time of the incident, the nightclub was hosting a late-night event, which quickly turned chaotic as flames spread rapidly through the packed venue. Eyewitness accounts describe a scene of panic as many staff members found themselves trapped inside. Firefighters faced significant challenges in reaching the main structure due to a narrow causeway that spanned a small water body.

Senior officials, including the Director General of Police and teams from the North Goa district administration, arrived at the scene shortly after the fire was reported to coordinate rescue operations. By the early hours of December 7, emergency crews were still sifting through the charred remains of the building.

Authorities indicated that most of the victims succumbed to suffocation, while three individuals suffered fatal burns. Six others were hospitalized but are reported to be in stable condition. Families of the deceased gathered at the site as officials began the identification process.

Among the deceased, the majority were migrant workers from various Indian states, including Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Maharashtra, Assam, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, and Karnataka. Additionally, one worker from Nepal was confirmed to be among the victims, as reported by the BBC.

In the aftermath of the tragedy, four individuals, including the nightclub’s manager, have been arrested. An arrest warrant has also been issued for the club’s owner, who remains unaccounted for.

Chief Minister Pramod Sawant visited the site and announced a formal inquiry into the incident. In a post on social media platform X, he expressed his condolences, stating, “This is a very painful day for all of us in Goa.” He emphasized that the inquiry would investigate fire-safety compliance and building regulations, asserting that “those found responsible will face the most stringent action under the law — any negligence will be dealt with firmly.”

Prime Minister Narendra Modi also expressed his sorrow over the incident, calling the fire “deeply saddening” in a social media post.

This tragic event has raised serious concerns about safety regulations in entertainment venues, prompting calls for stricter enforcement to prevent such disasters in the future. As investigations continue, the community mourns the loss of life and seeks answers regarding the circumstances that led to this devastating fire.

According to BBC, the investigation is ongoing as officials work to uncover the full details surrounding this tragic incident.

Senate Republicans Investigate Biden Immigration Programs Following Guard Shooting

Senate Republicans are launching an investigation into President Biden’s immigration parole programs following a tragic shooting involving National Guard members in Washington, D.C.

Senate Republicans are initiating an investigation into former President Joe Biden’s immigration parole programs, which they contend facilitated the entry of the alleged shooter in a recent incident involving the National Guard in Washington, D.C.

Senators John Cornyn of Texas and Josh Hawley of Missouri will lead a hearing focused on the Biden administration’s parole policies, scheduled for December 16. This announcement follows the shooting of two National Guard members—U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe, who was wounded, and U.S. Army Spc. Sarah Beckstrom, who tragically lost her life. The alleged shooter, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, is an Afghan national who entered the United States under Biden’s Operation Allies Welcome in 2021.

Operation Allies Welcome was initiated amid the chaotic withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan, which ultimately led to the Taliban’s resurgence in the country. At that time, President Biden directed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to oversee the resettlement of “vulnerable Afghans, including those who worked alongside us in Afghanistan for the past two decades, as they safely resettle in the United States,” according to an archived statement from the DHS.

Cornyn, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Border Security and Immigration, expressed his concerns about the potential repercussions of the immigration policy. He stated, “Now those concerns have become reality, with deadly consequences.” He added, “There will be no greater stain on Joe Biden’s legacy than that of his failed immigration parole programs, which he abused time after time to welcome into the U.S. hundreds of thousands of unvetted illegal aliens and potential terrorists who hate our country and want to kill Americans.”

Hawley, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, has also been vocal about the Biden administration’s lack of vetting for evacuees since 2021. He referenced an email from a U.S. official present during the evacuation in Afghanistan, which indicated that he was instructed by Biden to “fill up the planes—even without vetting.” Hawley remarked, “And now their recklessness has opened the door to terrorism within our borders, including the deadly attack on our National Guardsman two weeks ago. There needs to be accountability.”

The upcoming hearing is also a response to a letter from several Senate Republicans, including Cornyn, directed to Secretary of State Marco Rubio. In the letter, they urged for a review and enhancement of vetting standards for Afghan nationals in light of the recent shooting incident in Washington, D.C.

As the investigation unfolds, it is clear that the implications of immigration policies during the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan are under intense scrutiny, particularly in the wake of tragic events that have raised questions about national security and the vetting process for newcomers to the United States. The outcome of the hearing may have significant ramifications for future immigration policies and the Biden administration’s handling of such programs.

According to Fox News, the investigation reflects a growing concern among lawmakers regarding the safety and security of American citizens in light of recent events.

Metaview CTO Responds to Proposed H-1B Fee Hike with Viral Comment

Metaview CTO Shahriar Tajbakhsh has sparked a viral conversation by expressing his willingness to pay a proposed $100,000 annual H-1B visa fee “per day” to secure top talent for his company.

Shahriar Tajbakhsh, co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of Metaview AI, has made headlines with his bold response to the proposed $100,000 annual fee for H-1B visas. The London-based company, which is actively hiring in India, is navigating a complex landscape of rising anti-H-1B sentiment in the United States.

In a recent exchange on X, Tajbakhsh addressed a post advocating for the H-1B visa fee to be set at $100,000 per year instead of a one-time charge. He responded with, “Make it per day. I’ll set up a recurring payment,” emphasizing that the cost is insignificant compared to the value that skilled talent brings to his organization.

Metaview has also launched a campaign in India featuring posters that read, “Yes, we still sponsor H-1Bs” and “No, AI won’t build itself.” This initiative has gained traction on social media, setting the company apart in an environment where many firms view visa sponsorship as an increasing burden.

Tajbakhsh, who has Iranian roots, has long been an advocate for the importance of talent in driving innovation. In a previous interview with Business Insider, he stated, “When you sum up the value created by people’s hard work, $100,000 just doesn’t matter. The only way to build anything meaningful that changes people’s lives is to have a world-class team — there’s no shortcut around that. Trying to save money on talent is the most irresponsible thing a founder could possibly do.”

For Tajbakhsh, the focus on visa costs misses the larger picture. He has confirmed that Metaview plans to file additional H-1B petitions in the upcoming lottery, despite the tightening of visa regulations under President Donald Trump’s executive order. “An organization’s success or failure is a function of its people,” he remarked.

Tajbakhsh’s perspective reflects a broader trend in the tech industry. Companies aiming to develop cutting-edge products cannot afford to overlook skilled workers, regardless of political shifts or rising costs. As Metaview continues to expand its hiring efforts, the message is clear: for many founders, the pursuit of talent will always take precedence over the noise surrounding immigration debates.

According to Moneycontrol, Tajbakhsh’s comments and Metaview’s proactive approach highlight the ongoing challenges and opportunities in the tech sector as it grapples with the complexities of immigration policy.

Harvard University Faces Data Breach Following Phone Phishing Attack

Harvard University has confirmed a data breach involving its alumni and donor database, following a phone phishing attack that has raised concerns about cybersecurity at elite institutions.

Harvard University has reported a significant data breach affecting its alumni and donor database, marking the second cybersecurity incident at the institution in recent months. The breach was the result of a phone phishing attack that compromised sensitive information related to alumni, donors, faculty, and some students.

Elite universities, including Harvard, Princeton, and Columbia, invest heavily in research, talent, and digital infrastructure. However, these institutions have increasingly become targets for cybercriminals seeking access to vast databases filled with personal information and donation records. Recent months have seen a troubling pattern of breaches across Ivy League campuses, highlighting vulnerabilities in their cybersecurity measures.

In a notification posted on its website, Harvard confirmed that an unauthorized party accessed information systems used by Alumni Affairs and Development. The breach occurred after an individual was tricked into providing access through a phone-based phishing attack. “On Tuesday, November 18, 2025, Harvard University discovered that information systems used by Alumni Affairs and Development were accessed by an unauthorized party as a result of a phone-based phishing attack,” the university stated. “The University acted immediately to remove the attacker’s access to our systems and prevent further unauthorized access.”

The compromised data includes personal contact details, donation histories, and other records integral to the university’s fundraising and alumni operations. Given that Harvard routinely raises over a billion dollars annually, the exposed database is considered one of its most valuable assets, making the breach particularly concerning.

This incident follows an earlier investigation in October, when Harvard looked into reports of its data being involved in a broader hacking campaign targeting Oracle customers. This earlier warning underscored the university’s high-risk status, and the latest breach further confirms the need for enhanced cybersecurity measures.

Harvard is not alone in facing these challenges. Other Ivy League institutions have reported similar incidents in quick succession. On November 15, Princeton disclosed that one of its databases, linked to alumni, donors, students, and community members, had been compromised. Additionally, the University of Pennsylvania reported unauthorized access to its information systems related to development and alumni activities on October 31. Columbia University has faced even larger repercussions, with a breach in June exposing personal data of approximately 870,000 individuals, including students and applicants.

These repeated attacks illustrate how universities have become predictable targets for cybercriminals. They store sensitive information, including identities, addresses, financial records, and donor information, within sprawling IT systems. A single mistake, such as a weak password or a convincing phone call, can create an entry point for attackers.

As these incidents continue to unfold, it is clear that universities must strengthen their defenses and adopt more proactive monitoring strategies. While it is impossible to completely prevent breaches, individuals can take steps to protect their own information. Implementing two-factor authentication (2FA) adds an extra layer of security to accounts, making it more difficult for attackers to gain access even if they acquire a password.

Using a password manager can also help create and store strong, unique passwords for each site, preventing a single compromised password from unlocking multiple accounts. Additionally, individuals should regularly check if their email addresses have been exposed in past breaches and change any reused passwords immediately if a match is found.

In light of these ongoing threats, it is advisable to limit the amount of personal information shared publicly and consider utilizing data removal services to monitor and erase personal information from the internet. While no service can guarantee complete removal, these services can help reduce the risk of identity theft and make it more challenging for attackers to target individuals.

As the landscape of cyber threats continues to evolve, universities like Harvard must adapt to protect the sensitive data they hold. The recent breach serves as a reminder of the vulnerabilities that persist even within the most well-funded institutions. Until stronger defenses are implemented, it is likely that more incidents will occur, prompting further investigations and raising questions about the security of personal data shared with these universities.

For more information on protecting personal data and cybersecurity best practices, visit CyberGuy.com.

Putin Promises Uninterrupted Oil Supply to India Amid U.S. Pressure

Russian President Vladimir Putin assured Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi of uninterrupted oil supplies, reinforcing the resilience of their partnership amid U.S. pressure during their recent meeting in New Delhi.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has pledged that Moscow will continue supplying oil to India without disruption, marking a significant stance against U.S. pressure during his recent meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi. The two leaders underscored the strength of the India–Russia relationship, asserting that it remains robust and resistant to external influences.

The remarks followed the annual India–Russia summit and appeared to be a direct response to increasing Western efforts, particularly from Washington, aimed at discouraging India from deepening its energy ties with Moscow.

In August, U.S. President Joe Biden imposed a 25% import tariff on India as a punitive measure for purchasing discounted Russian oil. The U.S. administration claimed that these purchases were aiding Russia in financing its war in Ukraine and undermining U.S. sanctions.

New Delhi condemned the tariffs as “unreasonable” and “unjustified,” reminding Washington that its strategic partnership with Russia spans decades, particularly in areas of defense and geopolitical cooperation. Putin made it clear that Moscow would not alter its energy strategy in light of American pressure.

“Russia is a dependable supplier of energy resources and all essentials for India’s energy development. We will continue guaranteeing the uninterrupted flow of fuel to support India’s fast-growing economy,” Putin stated.

While Modi did not directly address oil during their discussions, he emphasized that energy security has always been a “key pillar” of the India–Russia partnership.

In a televised interview prior to the summit, Putin openly criticized U.S. objections to India’s oil purchases, questioning the double standards of Washington.

“If the U.S. has the right to buy our nuclear fuel, why shouldn’t India have the same privilege?” he asked.

This visit marked Putin’s first trip to India since the onset of the invasion of Ukraine, and both leaders appeared committed to demonstrating that their partnership remains steadfast.

Modi personally welcomed Putin at the airport—an uncommon gesture—followed by a warm embrace and a private dinner, underscoring the closeness between the two leaders.

In their joint statement, Modi described the India–Russia relationship as a “guiding star” built on mutual trust and long-standing ties that have “always stood the test of time.”

Both countries affirmed that, despite global tensions, their partnership remains strong and unaffected by geopolitical pressures. Putin has recently intensified outreach to India and China as Russia faces stringent economic sanctions from the U.S. and the European Union.

The summit concluded with significant agreements aimed at strengthening bilateral ties. Both nations finalized an economic cooperation program extending to 2030, with the goal of doubling bilateral trade to $100 billion annually by that year.

In terms of defense cooperation, Russia continues to be India’s largest supplier, although India has been diversifying its sources in recent years. While specific weapons systems were not detailed, both sides agreed on joint production of advanced defense platforms and strengthening long-term military collaboration.

This includes potential cooperation involving advanced Russian systems like the Sukhoi Su-57 or other next-generation platforms, further solidifying the defense ties between the two nations.

The developments from this summit highlight the ongoing commitment of both India and Russia to maintain and enhance their partnership, even in the face of external pressures, particularly from the United States, according to Global Net News.

Billionaire Entrepreneur Siddharth Shankar Backs Indian-American Venture Capital Fund

Billionaire entrepreneur Siddharth Shankar has invested $500,000 in Arya Ventures, a venture capital fund aimed at supporting Indian-origin startups in the UK and the US.

Billionaire Indian entrepreneur Siddharth Shankar has made a substantial commitment of $500,000 to Arya Ventures, a seed-stage venture capital fund focused on supporting entrepreneurs of Indian origin. Shankar, who serves as the Global Chief Operating Officer of Komerz, expressed enthusiasm for his investment.

“I’m excited to back the next generation of Indian diaspora founders,” Shankar stated in a recent announcement.

This investment marks a significant milestone for Arya Ventures, which has a total fund size of INR 84 crore (approximately $10 million). The fund is specifically designed to target post-product, post-revenue startups founded by Indian diaspora entrepreneurs primarily located in the UK and the US.

The fund’s strategy is underpinned by compelling market data that highlights the achievements of Indian immigrants in the entrepreneurial landscape. Since 2018, Indian immigrants have founded or co-founded 72 of the 358 unicorns that have emerged in the United States, with a collective valuation exceeding INR 16.4 lakh crore (around $195 billion). In the UK, companies owned by the Indian diaspora generate revenues of INR 3.87 lakh crore (approximately $46 billion) and provide employment to over 174,000 individuals.

“Arya Ventures has positioned itself uniquely to access and support exceptional entrepreneurs from this community,” Shankar noted. “Indian-origin founders have demonstrated an extraordinary ability to build category-defining companies. Despite representing only 2.1% of the US population, they have founded 19% of American unicorns. This fund gives us direct access to that exceptional talent pipeline, and I believe we’re investing at exactly the right moment to capture the next wave of innovation.”

Noteworthy Indian-origin entrepreneurs who have successfully built multiple unicorns include Siddharth Shankar (Tails Group), Mohit Aron (Nutanix, Cohesity), Jyoti Bansal (AppDynamics, Harness), and Ashutosh Garg (Bloomreach, Eightfold.ai).

With 78% of Indian-Americans holding at least a bachelor’s degree—more than double the national average of 36%—the educational background of this demographic continues to strengthen the talent pipeline. In the 2022-2023 period, Indian professionals received approximately 320,000 work visas, further contributing to this trend.

Indian-origin individuals constitute 73% of high-skilled work visa holders in the United States, reflecting a sustained influx of entrepreneurial talent.

Arya Ventures is currently evaluating terms with several promising startups in its pipeline, including those already backed by Y Combinator and other prominent venture capital firms. The fund’s strategy emphasizes investments in AI and technology startups, leveraging the concentration of Indian-origin talent in these cutting-edge sectors.

“Early-stage venture capital success depends on identifying exceptional founders,” said Anmol Goel, Founding Partner of Arya Ventures. “Our research shows that 85% of the most highly-educated founders come from the Indian diaspora, and 32% of all Fortune 100 founders are of Indian origin. This concentration of talent and track record validates our investment focus.”

This investment by Siddharth Shankar into Arya Ventures highlights the growing significance of Indian-origin entrepreneurs in the global startup ecosystem and underscores the potential for innovation within this community, according to India Currents.

US Officials Identify India as Crucial Ally in Global AI Competition

Top U.S. lawmakers and experts emphasize India’s crucial role as a strategic ally in the global race for artificial intelligence amid rising competition with China.

WASHINGTON, DC – India’s significance as a vital technology and strategic partner has been underscored this week as leading U.S. lawmakers and experts caution that the global race for artificial intelligence (AI) is reaching a critical juncture. This phase is characterized by China’s swift military and industrial adoption of AI, alongside tightening U.S.-led semiconductor controls aimed at preserving technological superiority.

During a Senate hearing on December 2, witnesses highlighted the necessity for enhanced coordination among democratic allies, including India, to establish global AI standards, secure chip supply chains, and counter Beijing’s ambitions.

The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific, and International Cybersecurity Policy convened the session to evaluate the geopolitical risks stemming from China’s rapid AI advancements. While much of the dialogue centered on export controls and military implications, India emerged early as a pivotal player in the evolving governance framework.

Tarun Chhabra, a former White House national security official now affiliated with Anthropic, drew a direct connection to India. He argued that developing trusted AI frameworks necessitates close collaboration with like-minded democracies. Chhabra stated, “The closest thing we have right now is the AI summits that are happening,” and noted, “There’s one coming up in India, and that’s an opportunity for us to build the kind of trusted AI framework that I mentioned earlier.” India is set to host a significant AI summit in February 2026.

Chhabra emphasized that leadership in AI will significantly influence economic prosperity and national security, describing the next two to three years as a “critical window” for both frontier AI development and global AI dissemination. He cautioned that China would struggle to produce competitive AI chips unless the U.S. squanders its advantage, urging stricter controls to prevent “CCP-controlled companies” from filling their data centers with American technology.

Senators Pete Ricketts and Chris Coons framed the AI race in terms that resonate with India’s strategic considerations. Ricketts likened the challenge to the ‘Sputnik’ moment and the Cold War-era space race, asserting that the U.S. now faces “a similar contest, this time with Communist China and even higher stakes.” He remarked that AI will transform daily life, with its military applications poised to reshape the global balance of power. “Beijing is racing to fuse civilian AI with its military to seize the next revolution in military affairs. However, unlike the moon landing, the finish line in the AI race is far less clear,” he stated.

Coons echoed the sentiment, asserting that American and allied leadership in AI is crucial to ensure that global adoption relies on “our chips, our cloud infrastructure, and our models.” He highlighted that China has “poured money into research, development, deployment,” and pointed out Beijing’s ambition to become the world’s leading AI power by 2030. He insisted that maintaining AI primacy must be “a central national imperative,” linking it directly to the broader geostrategic landscape.

Experts expressed concerns about the rapid advancement of China’s military integration of AI. Chris Miller from the American Enterprise Institute noted that both Russia and Ukraine are already utilizing AI to “sift through intelligence data and identify what signal is and what is noise,” arguing that these technologies are becoming essential for defense planning. He maintained that U.S. leadership in computing power remains significant, but the country must sustain its edge in “electrical power,” “computing power,” and “brain power”—the three critical components for enduring AI dominance.

Gregory Allen of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) warned that AI is following a trajectory akin to the early years of computing, evolving into a foundational technology across military, intelligence, and economic sectors. He stated, “The idea that the United States can lose its advantage in AI and maintain its advantage in military power is simply nonsensical.” Allen praised U.S. chip export controls as the most consequential action taken in recent years, arguing that without them, “the largest data centers today would already be in China.” He also opposed granting Chinese companies remote access to U.S. cloud computing, asserting that such access would enable them to “build their own platforms” before ultimately sidelining American firms.

James Mulvenon, a prominent expert on the Chinese military, warned that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is integrating large language models “at every level of its system,” constructing an AI-driven decision architecture it deems “superior to human cognition.” He expressed confidence that Beijing could acquire Western chips through “smuggling and a planetary scale level of technology espionage.”

All four witnesses rejected any proposals to export NVIDIA’s advanced H-200 or Blackwell chips to China. Allen cautioned that Blackwell chips “do what Chinese chips can’t” and warned that selling them would provide Beijing with “a bridge to the future” that it currently cannot construct. This discussion underscores the urgency of maintaining a competitive edge in the AI landscape, particularly as global dynamics continue to shift.

According to IANS, the implications of these discussions highlight the importance of India’s role in the evolving global AI framework.

NYC Mayor-Elect Offers Guidance on Resisting ICE Agents at Home

New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani has released a video guide on immigrant rights during encounters with ICE, emphasizing his commitment to protect the city’s immigrant communities.

New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani has taken a significant step in advocating for immigrant rights by releasing a comprehensive video guide aimed at informing residents about their rights during encounters with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This initiative follows a recent attempted ICE raid in Manhattan, highlighting the urgency of the situation as immigration enforcement practices come under renewed scrutiny.

In the video, Mamdani pledges to protect the rights of the city’s more than 3 million immigrants, asserting that his administration will stand firm against federal actions that threaten these communities. He emphasizes the importance of being prepared, informed, and confident when asserting legal rights during interactions with ICE.

Opening the video, Mamdani recalls the recent ICE raid, stating, “As mayor, I’ll protect the rights of every single New Yorker, and that includes the more than 3 million immigrants who call this city their home. But we can all stand up to ICE if you know your rights.”

He provides essential guidance for immigrants who may find themselves facing ICE agents. Mamdani clarifies that ICE cannot enter private spaces, such as homes, schools, or workplaces, without a judicial warrant signed by a judge. “If ICE does not have a judicial warrant signed by a judge, you have the right to say, ‘I do not consent to entry’ and the right to keep your door closed,” he advises.

Addressing the tactics used by ICE, Mamdani warns that agents may present paperwork claiming authority to make an arrest, but he stresses that such claims can be misleading. “ICE is legally allowed to lie to you, but you have the right to remain silent,” he states. He encourages individuals to ask repeatedly, “Am I free to go?” if they are being detained.

Additionally, Mamdani informs viewers that they are legally permitted to film ICE agents as long as they do not interfere with an arrest. He underscores the importance of remaining calm during any interaction with law enforcement, advising against impeding investigations, resisting arrest, or fleeing the scene.

Concluding the video, Mamdani reaffirms New Yorkers’ constitutional right to protest. “New Yorkers have a constitutional right to protest, and when I’m mayor, we will protect that right,” he declares. “New York will always welcome immigrants, and I will fight each and every day to protect, support, and celebrate our immigrant brothers and sisters.”

This video release comes shortly after Mamdani’s meeting with President Donald Trump, where they found common ground on issues related to affordability and improving conditions in New York. Despite this dialogue, Mamdani has reiterated New York’s status as a sanctuary city, emphasizing the city’s commitment to its policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

During a speech at a church in the Bronx, Mamdani stated, “I shared with the president directly that New Yorkers want to follow the laws of our city, and the laws of our city say that, in our sanctuary city policies, city government can be in touch with the federal government on around 170 serious crimes.” He expressed concern over the broader implications of immigration enforcement, particularly regarding individuals being arrested or deported for minor infractions, such as attending a court appearance.

As he prepares to take office, Mamdani remains focused on ensuring the safety and rights of immigrants in New York City, vowing to protect those who call the city home.

According to Fox News, Mamdani’s proactive approach reflects a commitment to uphold the rights of immigrants amidst ongoing challenges in immigration policy.

Thailand Conducts Airstrikes Near Cambodia Border Amid Rising Tensions

Thailand has launched airstrikes along its border with Cambodia amid escalating tensions and mutual accusations of aggression, raising concerns about the stability of a ceasefire brokered by former President Trump.

Thailand conducted airstrikes along its disputed border with Cambodia late Monday, escalating tensions between the two nations as both sides accused each other of initiating violence. This development raises significant doubts about the sustainability of a ceasefire that was negotiated by former President Donald Trump.

Thai military officials reported that Cambodian troops opened fire in several locations along the frontier, resulting in the death of one Thai soldier and injuries to others. In response, the Thai army evacuated civilians from nearby communities as the situation intensified. Major General Winthai Suvaree stated that Cambodian forces fired first into Thai territory, prompting the airstrikes aimed at “military targets in several areas to suppress Cambodian supporting fire attacks.”

However, Cambodia rejected this narrative. Maly Socheata, a spokesperson for the Cambodian Defense Ministry, claimed that Thai forces were the aggressors and stated that Cambodia did not retaliate during the initial exchange. The ministry has called for Thailand to cease its military actions.

Footage released by Cambodia’s Education Ministry depicted students leaving schools near the border, as families hurried to retrieve their children amid the escalating conflict.

This latest escalation follows a smaller exchange of fire that occurred on Sunday, during which Thailand reported that two of its soldiers were wounded. Thai troops responded for approximately 20 minutes, while Cambodia maintained that Thailand initiated that encounter and did not return fire.

Tensions have persisted despite a ceasefire agreement reached in October, which aimed to end five days of fighting in July that resulted in numerous casualties among soldiers and civilians. The ceasefire has shown signs of strain, particularly last month when several Thai soldiers were injured by land mines in contested areas. Following this incident, the Thai government announced a suspension of certain aspects of the ceasefire agreement.

Both Thailand and Cambodia have continued to blame each other for violations of the ceasefire, even as the agreement called for cooperation on mine removal and measures to stabilize the border region.

The historical context of the conflict between Thailand and Cambodia dates back centuries, rooted in rival kingdoms that vied for influence. In contemporary times, disputes have primarily revolved around French colonial-era border maps, which Thailand contends are inaccurate.

Despite the October ceasefire, neither country has achieved a resolution to the underlying territorial dispute. Regional observers have expressed concerns that renewed clashes could lead the two nations closer to a broader conflict unless diplomatic efforts are revitalized.

According to The Associated Press, the situation remains fluid as both nations navigate the complexities of their long-standing territorial issues.

Trump’s Recent Pardons and Power Moves Amid Peace Prize Discussion

Donald Trump recently made headlines with a series of controversial pardons, a cabinet meeting filled with provocative statements, and the acceptance of a FIFA peace prize tailored for him.

Donald Trump has been restless lately. With no executive orders to sign for over a week, the former president, known for his penchant for ruling by decree, took to social media to announce the termination of pardons issued by his predecessor, Joe Biden. Trump claimed these pardons were signed using an “AUTOPEN,” a mechanical device traditionally used by presidents of both parties.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump declared, “Anyone receiving ‘Pardons,’ ‘Commutations,’ or any other Legal Document so signed, please be advised that said Document has been fully and completely terminated, and is of no Legal effect.” This unprecedented move left legal experts questioning its validity and raised eyebrows across the political spectrum.

While waiting for more official duties, Trump engaged in a five-hour social media blitz, posting 116 times on various topics from 7:09 PM until nearly midnight, averaging a post every two minutes. The following morning, during a two-hour cabinet meeting, Trump was seen nodding off, prompting speculation about his engagement level.

During the meeting, Secretary of State Marco Rubio praised Trump’s “transformational” leadership, while Trump made controversial remarks about “fourth world war countries” and referred to Somali immigrants in derogatory terms. He also dismissed concerns about the rising cost of living, labeling affordability as a “con job” and a “Democrat scam,” while boasting about “unprecedented deals” to drastically reduce drug prices.

Despite criticism regarding his public demeanor, the White House defended Trump, asserting he was “listening attentively” throughout the cabinet meeting. They cited his comments on Somali immigrants as evidence of his engagement.

Trump also announced plans to escalate military operations against drug traffickers in South America, including missile strikes on land, which he described as “taking those son of a bitches out.” This announcement came amid ongoing scrutiny regarding the legality of previous military actions against smugglers in the Caribbean.

In a surprising move, Trump pardoned former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández, who is serving a 45-year prison sentence for drug trafficking. He also pardoned Democratic Representative Henry Cuellar, who is facing trial for alleged bribery. Trump criticized Biden for targeting Cuellar, claiming it was a result of a “weaponized Justice Department.”

In another political development, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Trump, allowing Texas lawmakers to utilize newly redrawn congressional maps that favor Republicans in the upcoming 2026 midterm elections. This decision came amidst a nationwide debate over gerrymandering, with both Republican and Democratic states engaged in redrawing electoral maps.

While Trump remained silent on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recent visit to India, where Putin offered “uninterrupted fuel supplies,” he did question U.S. pressure on India regarding oil purchases from Russia. Putin even suggested discussing the matter with Trump directly.

Despite not receiving a Nobel Peace Prize, Trump accepted a FIFA peace prize during the World Cup draw in Washington, D.C. The award, presented by FIFA President Gianni Infantino, was described as tailored for Trump, who accepted it at the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Infantino stated, “This is your prize, this is your peace prize,” as he handed Trump a trophy, medal, and certificate.

In his acceptance speech, Trump called the award “one of the great honours of my life,” claiming to have “saved millions and millions of lives” in various global conflicts. He cited examples such as the Congo and tensions between India and Pakistan, despite the latter’s lack of acknowledgment of U.S. involvement.

As Trump donned the medal, social media erupted with jokes and memes, with one user quipping, “I paid a lot of money for this fake PEACE prize.” Regardless of the mixed reactions, the award was undoubtedly a significant moment for the former president.

Trump’s recent actions, including his controversial pardons, provocative cabinet meeting, and acceptance of the FIFA peace prize, have reignited discussions about his leadership style and political strategies. As the political landscape continues to evolve, it remains to be seen how these developments will impact his standing within the Republican Party and among the electorate.

According to The American Bazaar, Trump’s latest moves have sparked both intrigue and criticism, reflecting the ongoing complexities of his presidency.

Scammers Target Wireless Customers in New Phone Scheme

A new phone return scam is targeting wireless customers, exploiting recent purchases to deceive victims into returning devices to fraudsters posing as legitimate carriers.

A recent scam has emerged, targeting wireless customers who have recently purchased new phones. This scheme involves criminals impersonating carrier representatives to trick victims into returning their devices under false pretenses.

Gary, a resident of Palmetto, Florida, shared an alarming experience involving a friend who fell victim to this scam. After purchasing a new phone from Spectrum, she received a call just two days later from someone claiming to be from the company. The caller alleged that a mix-up had occurred and that she had mistakenly received a refurbished phone instead of a new one. Trusting the caller, she returned the device.

However, later that evening, she began to suspect something was amiss. The following day, she contacted both UPS and Spectrum, only to discover that the call had been a scam. Fortunately, she was able to retrieve her phone before it was too late. UPS informed her that the return address had been altered shortly after the shipment was initiated, indicating the sophistication of the scam.

This incident underscores how quickly scammers can adapt their tactics and highlights the importance of vigilance when something feels off.

The mechanics of this scam are particularly concerning. Scammers often monitor recent phone purchases through leaked data, phishing attempts, or stolen shipment information. By knowing when a device was delivered, they can time their calls to coincide with the excitement of a new purchase.

Once they establish contact, the scammers impersonate representatives from legitimate carriers, claiming that the customer has received the wrong device. This narrative is designed to sound credible, especially since it relates directly to a recent transaction.

After convincing the victim, they send a seemingly official prepaid return label. However, once the victim ships the phone, the scammers can manipulate the destination through UPS or FedEx tools or hacked accounts, rerouting the device to an address of their choosing.

In some cases, scammers follow up with additional messages or calls to confirm receipt of the shipment, further delaying the victim’s realization that their package has been diverted.

Gary’s friend was fortunate to trust her instincts and acted quickly by contacting UPS and Spectrum, which allowed her to intercept the shipment before it reached the fraudster’s address.

To avoid falling victim to this scam, customers should take several precautionary steps. Always verify any return requests by contacting your carrier using official phone numbers or website chat options before shipping a device.

Be wary of any shipping labels that appear outside of your verified online account, as these may be attempts by scammers to reroute packages. It is crucial to use your own shipping methods and confirm the correct return address with your carrier before sending anything back.

Scammers often employ phrases like “We made a mistake” or “We will credit your account” to encourage quick action. It is essential to slow down and verify any requests before proceeding.

Implementing security measures such as creating a PIN and enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) can help protect your account from unauthorized access. Additionally, using strong antivirus software can block phishing sites and alert you to potential threats.

Another effective strategy is to utilize data removal services that can help minimize your exposure online. While no service can guarantee complete removal of your personal information, these services actively monitor and erase your data from various websites, reducing the risk of targeted scams.

Scammers may also create fake orders or return requests within your carrier account. Regularly reviewing your account activity can help you identify any unauthorized changes or suspicious requests.

Most carriers and shipping companies offer text or email alerts that can notify you of any changes to your shipments. Enabling these alerts can help you catch any unauthorized reroutes before they occur.

Securing your UPS or FedEx accounts with strong passwords is also vital, as scammers often exploit stolen credentials to alter shipping addresses. Consider using a password manager to generate and store complex passwords, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.

Lastly, never share tracking numbers or label details with anyone who calls you, as scammers can use this information to hijack shipments. Reporting any suspicious calls to your carrier’s fraud department can aid in investigations and protect other customers from similar schemes.

As phone return scams continue to proliferate, it is crucial to remain vigilant, especially during moments of excitement surrounding new purchases. Taking a few moments to verify return requests can prevent falling victim to these deceptive tactics.

For more information on protecting yourself from scams and to stay updated on the latest security alerts, consider subscribing to the CyberGuy Report for expert tips and resources, according to CyberGuy.com.

New Platform Reveals Insights into Family Separation Challenges

New records reveal the chaotic implementation of family separations during the Trump administration, highlighting systemic failures and the importance of transparency in immigration policy.

On October 30, 2025, the American Immigration Council launched a new platform that provides critical insights into the tumultuous execution of family separations during the Trump administration’s zero-tolerance policy. This transparency project aims to shed light on one of the most controversial immigration policies in recent history.

The initiative draws from thousands of internal government emails, memos, and previously undisclosed datasets obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and litigation. It reveals how the zero-tolerance policy was not merely a reactionary measure but a calculated strategy intended to deter migration by punishing families and obscuring accountability.

“Thanks to these records, we can more clearly see the inner workings of how this atrocity was carried out and the public’s struggle to obtain transparency and accountability,” said Raul Pinto, deputy legal director for transparency at the American Immigration Council. He emphasized that the same disregard for oversight and human consequences that enabled family separations is resurfacing in current mass detention and deportation efforts.

The family separation project features interactive visualizations and declassified documents that illustrate how families were effectively erased from government databases. It also highlights how officials misled the public and how congressional oversight and media scrutiny played pivotal roles in bringing an end to the policy. Notably, the project includes audio recordings of actor Corey Stoll reading key internal emails that expose the confusion and callousness surrounding the policy’s implementation.

Among the key findings from the archive are alarming admissions from officials regarding the integrity of their data on separated families. Internal emails reveal that leaders at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had “not very much” confidence in their own records, even while publicly denying any wrongdoing.

The project underscores the significant role that oversight from Congress, the press, and regulatory agencies played in halting family separations. However, Pinto pointed out that as of 2025, key oversight bodies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General and the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties have faced sidelining or defunding, raising concerns about the future of accountability in immigration policy.

Furthermore, the records illustrate that the family separation policy was built around intentional chaos. Confusion was weaponized to create significant delays in the reunification of children with their parents, exacerbating the trauma experienced by affected families.

<p“The records don’t just show government officials’ egregiousness and cruelty. They serve as a warning for our current moment of mass detention and deportation that is still seeing families separated,” Pinto stated. He cautioned that the manipulation of data and secrecy enabled systemic human rights violations during the Trump administration, and without transparency and oversight, history is likely to repeat itself.

The newly launched portal, a result of years of FOIA litigation by the American Immigration Council and its partners, allows journalists, researchers, and policymakers to delve into key documents and data that expose the inner workings of family separation and the failures that ensued.

Despite public assertions that the family separation policy ended in June 2018, many children remained separated from their parents for years, with some still not reunited. Pinto remarked, “Family separation was a national shame made possible by bureaucratic indifference to human suffering. The lesson here is clear: a collapse of oversight allows for cruelty to fill the vacuum.”

For more information and to explore the data, visit the American Immigration Council’s new platform.

According to American Immigration Council.

Putin and Modi Reinforce Economic Ties During New Delhi Discussions

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recent visit to New Delhi marked a significant reaffirmation of India-Russia ties, emphasizing economic collaboration amid geopolitical tensions.

Russian President Vladimir Putin was warmly welcomed in New Delhi during his two-day visit, his first since the invasion of Ukraine nearly four years ago. Prime Minister Narendra Modi greeted him personally at the airport, followed by a limousine ride, hugs, and a ceremonial welcome throughout the capital. An evening prayer event along the Ganges featured devotional lamps that spelled out “Welcome Putin,” a gesture that quickly gained traction on social media.

This visit not only reaffirmed India’s long-standing relationship with Russia but also served as a strategic message to Washington. The Trump administration has recently imposed steep tariffs and publicly criticized India for continuing to purchase discounted Russian oil.

Chietigj Bajpaee of Chatham House noted that India’s red-carpet treatment of Putin underscores a significant point: “India has options.” Despite increasing Western pressure to reduce ties with Moscow, New Delhi is signaling its unwillingness to abandon a relationship that has endured for decades, dating back to the Cold War when India aligned more closely with the Soviet Union amid tensions with Pakistan, the United States, and China.

Putin’s visit carries symbolic weight for Russia as well. Following an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court in March 2023, his international travel has been limited. Visiting “the world’s largest democracy,” as experts describe India, provides him with considerable global visibility.

Following bilateral talks, both leaders announced several new agreements, including a program aimed at increasing the number of Indian workers employed in Russia. Putin emphasized Moscow’s commitment to India’s energy needs, stating through a translator, “Russia is ready to continue uninterrupted fuel shipments to support India’s fast-growing economy.”

India has become one of the world’s largest buyers of Russian oil, significantly increasing its purchases after the Ukraine invasion. However, recent U.S. sanctions and tariff hikes have forced Indian refiners to scale back their purchases. The Trump administration doubled tariffs on India to 50%, imposing penalties on Kremlin-linked producers.

Reliance Industries, India’s largest buyer of Russian crude, halted imports in November to comply with a new European Union ban on refined products made from Russian oil. Despite these challenges, experts note that Russian oil continues to arrive in India through a network of sanctions-evading “shadow fleet” vessels that operate under false flags and disguises.

India has consistently argued that U.S. pressure is “unreasonable,” pointing out that both the EU and the U.S. continue to purchase certain Russian energy products themselves.

India is carefully navigating its diplomatic relationships, increasing purchases of American oil and natural gas to ease tensions with Washington while simultaneously deepening ties with Russia. Bajpaee remarked, “India is navigating a difficult path — keeping close ties with Moscow while strengthening engagement with the West.”

Modi referred to the Ukraine conflict delicately as “the situation in Ukraine,” reiterating India’s support for a peaceful resolution without directly condemning Russia. Meanwhile, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner recently held a five-hour meeting with Putin, although the Russian leader dismissed key American proposals.

During the summit, India and Russia finalized a plan to boost bilateral trade to $100 billion by 2030, announced more opportunities for Indian workers in Russia, and reaffirmed defense cooperation, including future joint production of advanced weapon platforms. Although Russia remains India’s largest arms supplier, its share has declined as India diversifies its sources with Western, Israeli, and domestic systems.

Bajpaee argues that despite India’s growing partnership with the U.S., which includes more joint military exercises than with any other country, the India-Russia relationship is still viewed as dependable in many respects. From New Delhi’s perspective, recent developments suggest that Russia may be more reliable than the U.S., whose behavior can sometimes be unpredictable, according to Bajpaee.

As the geopolitical landscape continues to evolve, the strengthening of India-Russia ties during Putin’s visit underscores the complexities of international relations in a multipolar world.

According to Chatham House.

HungerMitao Launches Million Meals Program to Address North Texas Hunger Crisis

HungerMitao has launched a Million Meals Program to address the escalating hunger crisis in North Texas, fueled by SNAP delays and inflation.

Food banks in North Texas are experiencing an unprecedented surge in demand as the region grapples with delays in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, a federal government shutdown, persistent inflation, and widespread layoffs. Organizations such as the North Texas Food Bank (NTFB) and Tarrant Area Food Bank (TAFB) are working tirelessly to keep community pantries stocked and maintain mobile distributions. However, the rising demand far exceeds their capacity to meet the needs of the community on their own.

In response to this urgent situation, HungerMitao has stepped in to enhance emergency food distribution efforts. The organization recently announced a significant contribution from Twisted X Global Brands, a footwear company based in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, which has donated one million meals through the HungerMitao Million Meals Program. This initiative aims to directly benefit both NTFB and TAFB.

“This contribution is a powerful testament to the compassion of our community,” said Raj Asava, Founder of HungerMitao. “At a moment when hunger is growing, Twisted X has stepped forward to help thousands of families across North Texas.”

HungerMitao, which translates to “Wipe Out Hunger” in Hindi, is a grassroots movement driven by volunteers. Its mission is to raise awareness about hunger in the United States and mobilize communities to address this critical issue. By fostering community engagement and leveraging the resources of the Indian American community, HungerMitao supports hunger relief efforts through the Feeding America network of food banks. Since its founding in 2017 by Raj and Aradhana Asava, the organization has facilitated the distribution of over 80 million nutritious meals across Feeding America and its partner food banks nationwide.

The meals donated through the Million Meals Program will significantly enhance the capacity of both NTFB and TAFB to quickly procure high-demand food items. This support is crucial to ensuring that mobile and pantry distributions remain uninterrupted for those who rely on them the most.

“Compassion is one of our highest priorities at Twisted X, and I feel we have a responsibility as a business and as humans to help our local community in times of need,” said Prasad Reddy, CEO of Twisted X Global Brands. “It is our intent to pay it forward in hopes that others will too.”

As the hunger crisis continues to escalate in North Texas, initiatives like the Million Meals Program are vital in addressing the immediate needs of families facing food insecurity. The collaboration between HungerMitao and Twisted X exemplifies how community engagement and corporate responsibility can come together to make a meaningful impact.

According to India Currents, the efforts of organizations like HungerMitao are essential in combating hunger and ensuring that no family goes without food during these challenging times.

U.S. Approves $52.8 Million Sale of Sonobuoys to India

The Pentagon has approved a $52.8 million sale of anti-submarine sonobuoys to India, enhancing defense cooperation and strengthening the strategic partnership between the two nations.

WASHINGTON, DC – The Pentagon has issued a federal notification regarding a proposed foreign military sale valued at $52.8 million to India. This transaction, which involves a new batch of anti-submarine sonobuoys, aims to deepen operational cooperation and reinforce the strategic partnership between the United States and India.

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) confirmed in its notification that India has requested the purchase of U.S.-made sonobuoys, which are devices deployed from aircraft to detect underwater activity. The package, funded entirely by India, also includes manuals, support services, and technical assistance. Additionally, the U.S. government and contractor teams will provide assistance to operate and sustain the equipment.

According to the notification, the proposed transfer will support U.S. foreign policy and national security objectives by strengthening the U.S.-India strategic relationship. It will also enhance the security of India, recognized as a major defense partner and an important force for political stability, peace, and economic progress in the Indo-Pacific and South Asia regions.

The Pentagon stated that the sonobuoys will enhance India’s capabilities to track underwater threats and conduct anti-submarine missions. The proposed sale is expected to improve India’s ability to address current and future threats by bolstering its capacity to conduct anti-submarine warfare operations from its MH-60R helicopters. The notification emphasized that India will have no difficulty integrating this equipment into its armed forces.

Furthermore, the U.S. assessed that the transfer poses no risk to regional stability. The Pentagon noted that the proposed sale will not alter the basic military balance in the region.

The principal contractors for this deal will be Sparton Corporation, based in De Leon Springs, Florida, and Undersea Sensor Systems Inc. (USSI) of Columbia City, Indiana, or a combination of both companies. The notification indicated that the deal includes no offset arrangements and will not require additional U.S. government or contractor personnel to be stationed in India. The Pentagon also assured that there would be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.

An annex detailing technology sensitivity described sonobuoys as “air-launched, expendable, electro-mechanical sensors designed to relay underwater sounds to remote processors.” These devices are considered an effective and affordable capability for anti-submarine warfare (ASW) operations. The notification concluded that India meets U.S. standards for safeguarding sensitive equipment, stating that a determination has been made that India can provide a level of protection for the sensitive technology being released that is comparable to that of the U.S. government. This sale is deemed necessary to further U.S. foreign policy and national security objectives.

Over the past two decades, India and the United States have significantly expanded their defense cooperation, particularly in the areas of maritime security and undersea surveillance, as China’s naval presence grows in the Indo-Pacific. The MH-60R helicopters, for which these sonobuoys are intended, play a crucial role in India’s modernization plans. The U.S. designation of India as a “Major Defense Partner” has facilitated faster technology transfers and more advanced joint projects. This latest sonobuoy package aligns with that broader framework, reinforcing shared interests in safeguarding critical sea lanes and maintaining regional stability, according to IANS.

Republicans Split on Obamacare’s Future Ahead of Subsidy Deadline

Republican lawmakers are grappling with whether to extend COVID-era Obamacare subsidies or pursue alternatives, reflecting deep divisions over the future of the Affordable Care Act.

Republicans are facing significant internal disagreements regarding the future of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly known as Obamacare, particularly as they consider extending COVID-era subsidies that could cost the government $30 billion annually.

Many GOP lawmakers express frustration over the rising costs associated with the ACA. While some advocate for scrapping the system entirely, others caution that a complete overhaul could lead to unintended consequences. Representative Harriet Hageman of Wyoming articulated her concerns, stating, “I don’t know that you can completely remove it. We have to have stability and certainty in the market.”

Representative Mike Kennedy from Utah echoed Hageman’s sentiments, noting that certain aspects of Obamacare have been beneficial. “It’s not going away anytime soon. I think there are some parts of the Obamacare policies that are positive,” Kennedy remarked. He emphasized the need for reform that does not simply involve funneling more money to insurance companies.

Conversely, some Republicans, like Representative Randy Fine of Florida, are more decisive in their criticism. “Obamacare is a failure,” Fine asserted. He argued that relying on borrowed funds to mask true costs does not solve the underlying issues, warning that continuing on the current path could lead to national bankruptcy.

The debate over Obamacare is intensifying as Republicans weigh the implications of allowing COVID-era subsidies to expire at the end of the month. Some party members are concerned that ending these subsidies could significantly increase premiums for approximately 90% of the 24 million individuals enrolled in the program, a point highlighted by Democrats.

According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan fiscal policy organization, maintaining the subsidies could result in an annual expenditure exceeding $30 billion.

As discussions unfold, Republicans are also exploring ways to reform Obamacare to enhance affordability. Representative Eric Burlison of Missouri believes that any changes must be substantial rather than superficial. “I would say we can’t be tinkering around the edges here. If we tinker, we’re really not gonna fix this problem,” Burlison stated.

Burlison suggested that rather than focusing solely on replacing Obamacare, the GOP should aim to create a more appealing alternative that could entice policyholders to leave the ACA voluntarily. “I think we need to do a new option and introduce that. And honestly, I think that this option will be so great no one will want to be in Obamacare anymore,” he remarked.

Other Republicans are open to considering more significant reforms, including the potential elimination of the program, but they remain cautious about the feasibility of such changes given the current political landscape. Representative Rich McCormick of Georgia pointed out the challenges of passing major legislation in the Senate, where 60 votes are typically required. “The question is, can you pass it? Sixty votes in the Senate. Not gonna happen. That’s just not realistic,” McCormick said.

Instead, McCormick advocates for reforms that would foster a more competitive healthcare market, which could help lower costs, even if Obamacare remains in effect. He cited the competitive pricing of non-insured medical services, such as LASIK eye surgery, as an example of how market competition can stabilize costs. “When insurance gets involved, when government gets involved, it becomes more expensive by design,” he explained.

As the deadline for subsidy decisions approaches, the Republican Party continues to grapple with its healthcare strategy, balancing the need for reform with the realities of legislative politics. The outcome of these discussions could significantly impact millions of Americans who rely on the Affordable Care Act for their health coverage.

According to Fox News, the ongoing debate highlights the complexities and divisions within the GOP as they navigate the future of healthcare policy in the United States.

NTT DATA CEO Predicts Short-Lived AI Bubble Amid Industry Changes

NTT DATA’s CEO Abhijit Dubey predicts a short-lived AI bubble, suggesting that while the market may normalize, the long-term outlook for artificial intelligence remains strong as corporate adoption grows.

The head of Japanese IT firm NTT DATA, Abhijit Dubey, has expressed his belief that the current artificial intelligence (AI) bubble will deflate more quickly than previous technology cycles. However, he anticipates that this will lead to a stronger rebound as corporate adoption aligns with increased infrastructure spending.

In an interview with the Reuters Global Markets Forum, Dubey stated, “There is absolutely no doubt that in the medium- to long-term, AI is a massive secular trend.” He elaborated that he expects a normalization in the market over the next 12 months, predicting, “It’ll be a short-lived bubble, and (AI) will come out of it stronger.”

Dubey highlighted that demand for computing resources continues to outpace supply, noting that “supply chains are almost spoken for” for the next two to three years. He pointed out that pricing power is shifting toward chipmakers and hyperscalers, reflecting their elevated valuations in public markets.

As the landscape of labor markets evolves due to AI advancements, Dubey, who also serves as NTT DATA’s chief AI officer, indicated that the company is reevaluating its recruitment strategies. He acknowledged the potential for significant disruption, stating, “There will clearly be an impact … Over a five- to 25-year horizon, there will likely be dislocation.” Despite these challenges, he affirmed that NTT DATA continues to hire across various locations.

Concerns regarding the so-called “AI bubble” have been echoed by several tech leaders in recent months. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has characterized AI as potentially creating an “industrial bubble,” but he also emphasized that its societal benefits will be “gigantic.”

Google CEO Sundar Pichai described the current wave of AI investment as an “extraordinary moment” but acknowledged the presence of “elements of irrationality” in the market, drawing parallels to the “irrational exuberance” seen during the dotcom era. He cautioned that no company is “immune to the AI bubble.”

Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, also weighed in on the topic, refraining from a simple yes-or-no answer regarding the existence of a bubble. He elaborated on the complexities of AI economics, expressing optimism about the technology’s potential while warning that some players in the ecosystem might make “timing errors” or face adverse outcomes regarding economic returns.

The term “bubble” typically refers to a period characterized by inflated stock prices or company valuations that are disconnected from underlying business fundamentals. One of the most notable examples of such a bubble was the dotcom crash of 2000, during which the value of internet companies plummeted rapidly.

As discussions around the AI bubble continue, industry leaders remain divided on the implications for the future of technology and its integration into various sectors. The consensus, however, is that while the current market may experience fluctuations, the long-term trajectory for AI appears promising.

According to Reuters, the evolving landscape of AI presents both challenges and opportunities for businesses as they navigate this transformative technology.

Fox News AI Newsletter Declares ‘Code Red’ for ChatGPT

The Fox News AI Newsletter highlights significant developments in artificial intelligence, including OpenAI’s urgent efforts to enhance ChatGPT and the evolving cybersecurity landscape.

The Fox News AI Newsletter keeps readers informed about the latest advancements in artificial intelligence technology, focusing on both the challenges and opportunities that AI presents.

In a recent update, OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman declared a “code red” initiative aimed at improving the quality of ChatGPT, as reported by The Wall Street Journal. This internal memo indicates a pressing need for enhancements to the AI tool, which has become increasingly popular.

Meanwhile, the cybersecurity landscape is rapidly evolving due to the rise of advanced AI tools. Recent incidents have underscored how quickly the threat environment is changing, with Chinese hackers reportedly transforming AI technologies into automated attack machines.

In a different application of AI, First Lady Melania Trump is set to launch a Spanish-language edition of the audiobook of her memoir. Utilizing AI audio technology, she aims to share her story with millions of Spanish-speaking listeners, as confirmed by Fox News Digital.

In another development, FoloToy has paused sales of its AI-powered teddy bear, Kumma, after a safety group discovered that the toy provided risky and inappropriate responses during testing. Following a week of intense review, the company has resumed sales, claiming to have implemented improved safeguards to ensure children’s safety.

Elon Musk has also weighed in on the potential of AI, stating in a recent interview that robotics powered by artificial intelligence are essential for driving productivity gains and addressing the national debt, which exceeds $38 trillion.

In a shift of focus, Meta has announced a reduction in its metaverse ambitions, redirecting resources toward the development of AI-powered glasses and wearable technology. This decision reflects a broader trend within the tech industry to prioritize AI advancements.

On the robotics front, Xpeng recently unveiled its Next Gen Iron humanoid, which captivated audiences with its remarkably fluid movements. Many spectators initially mistook the robot for a human actor, highlighting the increasing lifelikeness of robotic technology.

In a more critical vein, concerns have been raised about the influence of Big Tech in legislative matters. Following a significant defeat in the Senate earlier this year, industry leaders are reportedly attempting to insert a substantial corporate giveaway into must-pass legislation, such as the National Defense Authorization Act, which is crucial for military and national security.

Additionally, Sam Altman is reportedly exploring opportunities to build, fund, or acquire a rocket company, potentially positioning OpenAI to compete in the space race against Elon Musk’s ventures.

Stay updated on the latest advancements in AI technology and explore the challenges and opportunities it presents for the future with Fox News.

Godfather of AI Agrees with Gates and Musk on Future Unemployment

The long-term impact of artificial intelligence is sparking intense debate, with experts warning that mass unemployment may be an unavoidable consequence of its rapid advancement.

The long-term implications of artificial intelligence (AI) have emerged as one of the most contentious topics in the technology sector. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang predicts that AI will revolutionize nearly every profession, potentially paving the way for a four-day workweek. Meanwhile, Bill Gates has suggested that humans may soon become unnecessary for “most tasks.” Elon Musk has taken a more extreme stance, forecasting that within two decades, most people may not need to work at all.

These predictions, while dramatic, are not merely speculative—they are increasingly viewed as probable by experts in the field. Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneering computer scientist often referred to as the “Godfather of AI,” recently shared his concerns during a discussion at Georgetown University with Senator Bernie Sanders. Hinton warned that AI could lead to unprecedented economic disruption.

“It seems very likely to many people that AI will cause massive unemployment,” Hinton stated. He emphasized that corporations investing billions in AI infrastructure—from data centers to advanced chips—are banking on the technology’s ability to replace a significant number of workers at much lower costs. “They are essentially betting on AI replacing a large number of workers,” he added.

Hinton’s increasing vocal opposition to the direction of AI development reflects a broader critique of Silicon Valley’s priorities. He expressed to Fortune that Big Tech is primarily driven by short-term profits rather than genuine scientific advancement. This profit motive has led companies to aggressively market AI products that replace human labor with automated systems.

As the economic landscape surrounding AI continues to evolve, the viability of companies like OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, is under scrutiny. OpenAI is not expected to achieve profitability until at least 2030 and may require over $207 billion in investments to sustain its future growth.

Hinton’s shift from an AI pioneer to a vocal critic underscores the growing uncertainty surrounding the technology’s future. After leaving Google in 2023, he has become one of the most prominent voices cautioning against the potential dangers of AI. His groundbreaking work in neural networks earned him a Nobel Prize last year, further solidifying his influence in the field.

While Hinton acknowledges that AI will create new job opportunities, he warns that these roles will not compensate for the scale of job losses resulting from automation. He cautions against treating any long-term forecasts as definitive.

Describing the challenge of predicting AI’s evolution, Hinton remarked, “It’s like driving through fog. We can see clearly for a year or two, but 10 years from now, we have no idea what the landscape will look like.”

What is clear, however, is that AI is here to stay. Experts increasingly agree that workers who adapt and learn to integrate AI into their skill sets will be better positioned to navigate this transition.

Senator Bernie Sanders has attempted to quantify the potential scale of disruption caused by AI. In an October report, which included analyses driven by ChatGPT, Sanders warned that approximately 100 million American jobs could be at risk due to automation.

High-risk sectors identified in the report include fast food and food service, call centers, and manual labor industries. However, white-collar jobs are also vulnerable, with positions in accounting, software development, and healthcare administration facing potential downsizing.

Sanders highlighted the psychological and societal implications of such widespread job displacement. “Work is a core part of being human,” he noted. “People want to contribute and be productive. What happens when that essential part of life is taken away?”

Senator Mark Warner echoed these concerns, predicting that young workers may bear the brunt of the consequences. He warned that unemployment among recent graduates could soar to 25% within the next three years.

Warner cautioned that failing to regulate AI now could lead to a repeat of the mistakes made with social media. “If we handle AI the same way—without guardrails—we will deeply regret it,” he asserted.

As the conversation around AI’s future continues to unfold, the consensus among experts is that proactive measures are necessary to mitigate the potential fallout from this transformative technology, ensuring that the workforce can adapt to the changes ahead.

These insights reflect the growing alarm within the tech community regarding the societal impact of AI, highlighting the urgent need for thoughtful regulation and adaptation strategies.

According to Fortune, the ongoing dialogue surrounding AI’s implications for employment and society will remain a critical focus as the technology continues to evolve.

Democrats Plan Senate Vote on Three-Year ACA Funding Extension

Senate Democrats are set to push for a vote on a three-year extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies to avert significant health insurance premium increases for millions of Americans.

WASHINGTON — Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer announced on Thursday that Democrats will seek a Senate vote next week on legislation aimed at extending key Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies for an additional three years. This initiative is designed to prevent a sharp rise in health insurance premiums that could affect millions of Americans.

Schumer characterized the proposal as a “clean extension” of the enhanced ACA tax credits first introduced in 2021, which cap premiums for average marketplace plans at 8.5% of household income. He confirmed that all Senate Democrats are expected to support the measure.

Despite the Democratic push, the bill is likely to face significant opposition. Many Republicans contend that the expanded subsidies were intended as temporary pandemic relief and should not be made permanent.

“Republicans have one week to decide where they stand,” Schumer warned from the Senate floor. “They can vote to keep health care costs down — or block this bill and allow premiums to soar. This is one of the most consequential votes we’ll take.”

The upcoming vote follows a commitment made by Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., during negotiations to resolve last month’s historic government shutdown. Thune reiterated that he would permit Democrats to bring their bill to the floor, but it will require 60 votes, necessitating at least 13 Republican senators to cross party lines.

So far, achieving bipartisan consensus has proven elusive. Some Republicans express openness to extending ACA subsidies but are advocating for stricter income limits or policy changes. Others are insisting that any extension include stronger abortion restrictions — conditions that Democrats have firmly rejected.

The stakes are high as ACA subsidies are set to expire at the end of the year, potentially leading to steep price increases on the ACA marketplace. Democrats view this impending crisis as a significant campaign issue heading into the 2026 midterms, particularly if Republicans obstruct action.

Schumer emphasized that the Democratic bill represents the “only path” to prevent premium hikes in January, noting that voters will be closely monitoring which lawmakers take action to protect their health care.

“Time is running out,” he said. “Next week is Republicans’ last opportunity to stop premiums from skyrocketing.”

Thune did not specifically address health care in his remarks on Thursday but acknowledged earlier in the week that reaching a bipartisan solution is proving challenging. Republicans have proposed a variety of ideas — from extending subsidies with limitations to eliminating them altogether — but have yet to unify around a single plan.

Senate Republican Whip John Barrasso dismissed the Democratic proposal as merely an extension of “Biden’s Covid bonus payments,” asserting that Democrats are unwilling to make necessary changes to the ACA.

Sen. Jon Husted of Ohio expressed support for an extension but emphasized the need for funds to be redirected to benefit consumers more directly. He remarked that both parties remain at an impasse.

“Obamacare hasn’t delivered on its promise to lower costs and expand choices,” Husted stated. “Democrats won’t admit it, and Republicans don’t want to prop it up.”

In the House, a bipartisan coalition led by Reps. Jen Kiggans, R-Va., and Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., has proposed a two-year extension of ACA subsidies, coupled with stricter eligibility requirements and oversight. However, this plan has gained little traction, as most House Republicans oppose extending ACA funding altogether, and Speaker Mike Johnson has shown no interest in facilitating a vote. The only potential path forward would involve a discharge petition, which requires 218 signatures — a challenging feat given GOP reluctance.

Negotiators are increasingly pessimistic about finding a compromise. Sen. Angus King, who played a key role in brokering the agreement that allowed eight Democrats to support the reopening of the government, now believes a deal is unlikely.

“The Republicans have made Hyde a red line,” King told NBC News, referring to the longstanding abortion restrictions that many GOP lawmakers want tied to the ACA funds. “And that’s not going to work. If that’s their requirement, the deal is dead.”

With both parties entrenched and the deadline approaching, next week’s Senate vote is shaping up to be more symbolic than decisive. However, its political ramifications could resonate well into the 2026 elections, according to Source Name.

Indian Air Traffic Disruptions Lead to Mass IndiGo Flight Cancellations

Air travelers in India faced significant disruptions on December 5 due to widespread IndiGo flight cancellations, leading to delays, confusion, and soaring ticket prices across the country.

NEW DELHI — Air passengers traveling with IndiGo on December 5 experienced severe inconvenience and distress as widespread flight cancellations resulted in long delays and a sharp increase in ticket prices. The operational crisis, which had been escalating for several days, forced Delhi Airport to announce the cancellation of all IndiGo domestic departures until midnight. This suspension, confirmed by the airport via social media, created an immediate shortage of seats, causing airfares to skyrocket on major routes.

Travelers from various cities, including Pune, Bhubaneswar, Patna, Surat, Nagpur, and Mumbai, reported being stranded at airports, often without clear communication or assistance from the airline. In Pune, one distressed passenger shared, “I have been stuck here since yesterday (December 4). My wife has passed away, and her body is still at the hospital. I need to take her back home. It has already been two days, and no help is being provided.” Another passenger in Pune called for government intervention, stating, “When flights are being cancelled on such a large scale, there must be proper guidelines, oversight, and accountability. My leave from work has now been wasted, and I am stranded without an alternative.”

Other passengers highlighted the operational confusion, reporting that a cancellation message was sometimes followed by a web check-in notification, adding to the chaos. In Mumbai, one traveler described the situation regarding baggage handling after cancellations: “After the cancellation, nobody guided us regarding luggage… This lack of coordination is causing panic among travelers.” A passenger in Patna noted the severity of the ongoing disruptions: “Our flight on December 3 was cancelled, and now today’s flight is also cancelled. Nobody knows whether it will operate later or not, and ticket prices on other flights are rising rapidly.” An international traveler in Bhubaneswar expressed frustration over a lack of communication while trying to secure a connection to Bengaluru.

With over 220 IndiGo flights cancelled in Delhi alone, more than 100 cancellations in Bengaluru, and nearly 90 in Hyderabad, the reduction in capacity had an immediate impact on air travel costs nationwide. Airfares on several major routes surged to extraordinary levels for last-minute bookings. For instance, an Air India one-stop flight from Delhi to Bengaluru soared to Rs 1.02 lakh, while Delhi–Mumbai fares on Air India peaked at Rs 60,000. Tickets on the Chennai–Delhi route reached Rs 41,000 on Air India Express and Rs 69,000 on SpiceJet. A one-stop Air India flight from Hyderabad to Delhi climbed to Rs 87,000.

IndiGo attributed the widespread cancellations and delays to a combination of factors, primarily the full implementation of new Flight Duty Time Limitation norms for pilots. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) rules, which aim to reduce fatigue and improve safety by increasing weekly rest periods and limiting night-time operations, have resulted in a severe crew shortage and scheduling challenges for the airline.

IndiGo, which commands over 60 percent of the domestic market, acknowledged that it had underestimated the crew requirements under the new system. The operational meltdown has been building for several days, with the airline recording over 1,200 cancellations across its network in November. Delhi Airport confirmed that operations for all other carriers remained as scheduled, highlighting the extent of the crisis affecting IndiGo.

As the situation continues to unfold, passengers are left grappling with the aftermath of the cancellations, with many calling for better communication and support from the airline during such unprecedented disruptions. According to IANS, the operational challenges faced by IndiGo have raised concerns about the airline’s ability to manage its services effectively in the wake of regulatory changes.

Modi Presents Putin with Gifts, Including Russian Gita Translation

Prime Minister Narendra Modi presented a selection of culturally significant gifts to Russian President Vladimir Putin, including a Russian edition of the Srimad Bhagavad Gita and fine Assam tea.

NEW DELHI – During a recent visit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi bestowed an array of thoughtfully curated gifts upon Russian President Vladimir Putin. Among these gifts was a copy of the Srimad Bhagavad Gita translated into Russian, alongside GI-tagged Assam tea and the renowned saffron from Kashmir. Each item was chosen to reflect the rich craft, culture, and heritage of India.

The Srimad Bhagavad Gita, a sacred text that conveys the teachings of Lord Krishna to Arjuna, emphasizes ethical living, mind control, and inner peace. Modi presented this Russian edition to Putin as a means of facilitating easier reading and comprehension for his esteemed guest.

Accompanying the Gita was fine Assam black tea, celebrated for its distinctive flavor and numerous health benefits. This tea has been recognized with a Geographical Indication (GI) tag since 2007, underscoring its quality and authenticity.

In addition to these items, Modi gifted an ornate Murshidabad silver tea set, characterized by intricate engravings that showcase the rich artistry of West Bengal. This tea set symbolizes the deep cultural significance of tea in both Indian and Russian societies.

Another notable gift was a handcrafted silver horse from Maharashtra. This exquisite piece, adorned with intricate detailing, exemplifies the finesse of India’s metal craft traditions. The horse is depicted in a forward-moving stance, serving as a metaphor for the enduring and progressive partnership between India and Russia.

To further highlight India’s craftsmanship, Modi included a handcrafted marble chess set from Agra. This set combines fine craftsmanship with functional elegance, showcasing the region’s heritage of stone inlay work. Made from marble, wood, and semi-precious stones, it serves as both a visually striking decor piece and a playable game.

Lastly, the saffron gifted to Putin adds a fragrant touch from India’s northern region. Cultivated in the highlands of Kashmir, this prized spice is known for its rich color, aroma, and flavor. Often referred to as “red gold,” saffron holds significant cultural and culinary importance in India and is renowned for its health benefits, embodying a blend of nature, tradition, and craftsmanship.

These gifts not only symbolize the strong ties between India and Russia but also highlight the diverse cultural heritage that India has to offer, according to IANS.

Democrats Weigh Importance of U.S. Citizens Versus Drug Traffickers

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill express differing views on prioritizing U.S. citizens versus drug traffickers amid scrutiny of the Trump administration’s military actions against drug cartels in the Caribbean.

As scrutiny intensifies regarding the Trump administration’s military actions targeting suspected cartel members in the Caribbean, lawmakers on Capitol Hill have been asked to weigh the importance of U.S. citizen victims against that of drug traffickers.

Republican lawmakers, such as Senator Tim Sheehy of Montana, expressed a clear stance. “I can’t speak for anybody else, but my top concern is American citizens, their lives, their health. So, for me, it’s an easy choice. Kill drug dealers, save Americans,” Sheehy stated.

In contrast, Democratic lawmakers offered more nuanced perspectives on the issue. Representative Johnny Olszewski from Maryland emphasized the need to combat drug trafficking while adhering to legal standards. “Look, I fully support doing whatever we can within the legal means to make sure that we’re stopping drug trafficking,” Olszewski said. He acknowledged the importance of addressing the victims of drug violence, stating, “We should absolutely be concerned about the victims of drug trafficking and people who have lost their lives to drug violence.”

Olszewski further elaborated on the need for transparency regarding military actions. “We support all efforts to interdict, arrest, and hold accountable those attempting to smuggle drugs into this country. However, we have a rule of law, and we have rules of engagement for a reason. And so, we need to make sure that we have full transparency in terms of how these strikes are happening,” he said. He also raised concerns about the legality of the administration’s drug boat strikes, suggesting they could potentially violate laws and even constitute a war crime. “So, it merits full investigation; it merits the details being released,” he added.

Representative Adam Smith from Washington pushed back against the framing of the question, questioning the effectiveness of such military actions. “Is this going to do anything to truly help them?” he asked. “Cocaine’s still flowing, the demand is still there.” Smith pointed out the complexities of addressing drug trafficking, emphasizing the need for due process. “You see a drug dealer on the street, that’s a bad person. That person is selling drugs. Let’s say they’re selling actual fentanyl, not the cocaine that we’re hitting here. Would you support allowing anyone to execute that person who wants to on the spot?” he queried. “I care about selling drugs. I don’t want a fascist regime that gets to decide who they can kill when they want to kill them without any check on that power.”

Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island highlighted the need for a balanced approach to tackling drug distribution. “We have to do our best to disrupt drug distribution. Also, we have to invest in drug health care and drug education, et cetera. We have to do all the things. The real question is, how do you do it right?” When asked if the government should prioritize drug victims over traffickers, Reed responded, “I’ve commented and thank you for asking,” before departing.

In contrast, Republican lawmakers maintained a more unified stance in favor of aggressive actions against drug traffickers. Senator Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia stated, “If it disrupts the flow of one drug coming into West Virginia, I’m all for it.” She emphasized the severe impact of drug-related issues in her state, noting, “A lot of deaths from fentanyl, from overdoses. So, I’m supportive of whatever the president can do to end the flow of fentanyl.” Capito also expressed confidence in the intelligence supporting these military strikes.

Representative Glenn Grothman echoed this sentiment, asserting that the administration’s actions are necessary. “For too long, politicians have been satisfied to have a hundred thousand Americans die every year of drug overdoses. Finally, President Trump has stepped up to the plate and said, ‘No more,’” Grothman stated. He added, “If you’re going to attack our country, and these people know full well Americans are dying because of what they’re doing. If you’re going to attack our country, we’re going to fight back; about time.”

The debate among lawmakers reflects broader concerns about the balance between addressing drug trafficking and ensuring adherence to legal and ethical standards in military operations. As the situation evolves, the implications of these discussions will likely continue to resonate in both political and public spheres, shaping future policies and actions.

According to Fox News, the differing views among lawmakers highlight the complexities of addressing drug trafficking while prioritizing the safety and rights of U.S. citizens.

Canadian Politician Arrested Over Alleged AI-Generated Threat Voicemail

Ontario Councilor Corinna Traill has been arrested and charged with making threats after allegedly leaving a disturbing voicemail for a former mayoral candidate, claiming it was generated by artificial intelligence.

Ontario Councilor Corinna Traill has been arrested and charged with making threats against a former mayoral candidate, Tom Dingwall. The charges stem from a voicemail she allegedly left for Dingwall last summer, which he claims contained violent threats.

According to the Peterborough Police Service, Traill was taken into custody on Wednesday and faces two counts of uttering threats. The incident reportedly occurred in August when Dingwall received a voicemail from Traill, warning him not to run for mayor so that a friend of hers could run unchallenged.

In a post on Facebook, Dingwall detailed the contents of the voicemail, alleging that Traill threatened to come to his home, kill him, and sexually assault his wife. He expressed his outrage, stating, “To be clear, no elected official, paid to represent us, should utilize intimidation or threats to dissuade anyone from pursuing elected office or engaging in public service, especially to the benefit of their friend.”

In response to the allegations, Traill took to Facebook in September to deny sending the voicemail. She asserted, “I want to state clearly and unequivocally: I did not create this message.” Traill claimed that artificial intelligence technology was involved in the creation of the voicemail, stating that while parts of the message included her voice, other portions were generated artificially.

She further explained that her team was investigating the origins of the message, emphasizing her commitment to serving her community. “For more than a decade I have worked to represent the best interests of our community, advocate for our residents, and ensure that local decision-making reflects the values and priorities of the people I serve,” she wrote. “That dedication will not waver in light of these circumstances.”

Traill has since been released from jail on her own recognizance and is scheduled to appear in court in January, according to the police department. Fox News Digital has reached out to Traill for further comment on the situation.

The case has raised questions about the implications of artificial intelligence in political discourse and the potential for misuse in threatening communications. As the investigation continues, the community watches closely to see how this unusual situation unfolds.

According to Fox News, the incident highlights the need for clarity and accountability in political communications, especially in an era where technology can blur the lines of authenticity.

Trump Aims to Expand Travel Ban to Over 30 Countries

The U.S. government plans to expand its travel ban to over 30 countries, as confirmed by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem amid ongoing immigration policy changes.

The U.S. government is preparing to broaden its travel restrictions, with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announcing that more than 30 countries could be added to the existing travel ban.

In an interview on Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle,” Noem stated, “I won’t be specific on the number, but it’s over 30, and the president is continuing to evaluate countries.” When pressed about the possibility of expanding the ban to 32 countries, she reiterated her earlier comments without providing additional details.

In June, President Trump issued a proclamation that barred citizens from 12 countries from entering the United States and imposed restrictions on travelers from seven others. The administration cited the need to protect against “foreign terrorists” and other security risks. The current travel ban affects both immigrants and non-immigrants, including tourists, students, and business visitors.

Noem did not disclose which additional countries might be included in the expanded ban, which currently encompasses 19 nations. She emphasized the administration’s focus on national security, stating, “If they don’t have a stable government there, if they don’t have a country that can sustain itself and tell us who those individuals are and help us vet them, why should we allow people from that country to come here to the United States?”

Earlier reports from Reuters indicated that the administration was considering restrictions on travelers from 36 more countries, as outlined in an internal State Department cable. An expansion of the travel ban would represent a further tightening of the administration’s immigration policies, particularly in light of a recent incident in Washington, D.C., where two National Guard members were fatally shot. The shooter was identified as an Afghan national who arrived in the U.S. in 2021 through a resettlement program, which critics of the Trump administration argue lacked adequate vetting.

In the aftermath of the shooting, President Trump pledged to “permanently pause” migration from all “Third World Countries,” although he did not specify which nations he was referring to or clarify his definition of the term.

Prior to this announcement, officials from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had confirmed that Trump had directed a comprehensive review of asylum approvals granted during Joe Biden’s presidency, as well as green cards issued to citizens from 19 countries.

This latest development underscores the administration’s ongoing efforts to reshape U.S. immigration policy amid heightened security concerns and political pressures.

According to Reuters, the potential expansion of the travel ban reflects the administration’s commitment to a stricter immigration stance.

Trump Appoints New Architect Amid $300 Million White House Ballroom Project

President Donald Trump has appointed a new architect to lead the $300 million renovation of the White House ballroom, marking a significant phase in the project’s development.

President Donald Trump has enlisted a new architectural firm to spearhead the next stage of the ambitious White House ballroom project, which is set to reshape the East Wing and has seen its estimated cost rise to $300 million.

On Thursday, the Trump administration announced the hiring of Shalom Baranes Associates, a prominent architectural firm based in Washington, D.C. The firm will oversee the design and development of the ballroom, which the administration describes as a vital addition to the White House.

“As we begin to transition into the next stage of development on the White House Ballroom, the Administration is excited to share that the highly talented Shalom Baranes has joined the team of experts to carry out President Trump’s vision on building what will be the greatest addition to the White House since the Oval Office — the White House Ballroom,” said White House Spokesperson Davis Ingle in a statement.

Ingle praised Baranes, noting his extensive experience and contributions to the architectural landscape of the nation’s capital over the years. “Shalom is an accomplished architect whose work has shaped the architectural identity of our nation’s capital for decades, and his experience will be a great asset to the completion of this project,” he added.

Initially, Trump had selected McCrery Architects to design the ballroom, but the firm will now serve as a consultant for the project, according to a White House official.

Construction on the ballroom commenced in October, which included the demolition of the historic East Wing of the White House. The project is being privately funded, with costs escalating from an initial estimate of $200 million announced in July.

During a cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Trump provided an update on the construction progress, humorously noting, “I wouldn’t say my wife is thrilled.” He explained that the constant noise from pile drivers has been a source of frustration for First Lady Melania Trump.

Trump emphasized the need for the renovation, stating, “This has been needed for 150 years,” and expressed confidence that the ballroom will be “the finest ballroom ever built.” The White House has indicated that the new addition will be designed to accommodate large gatherings and state visits, with plans for completion before the end of Trump’s term.

The ballroom project reflects the administration’s commitment to enhancing the White House’s functionality and aesthetic appeal, aiming to create a space that honors the building’s historical significance while catering to modern needs.

According to Fox News, the ballroom is expected to serve as a venue for significant events, further solidifying the White House’s role as a central hub for national and international gatherings.

NYC Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani Supports Immigrants During ICE Crackdown

A recent immigration raid in New York City has sparked significant outrage, prompting Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani to express strong support for the city’s immigrant communities.

A recent immigration raid by federal authorities in New York City has ignited widespread anger among local residents. This operation, part of a series of similar actions occurring nationwide, prompted an immediate backlash as nearly 200 protesters gathered to obstruct the agents. Clashes with police resulted in several demonstrators being taken into custody, according to The Guardian.

In response to the escalating situation, New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani voiced his unwavering support for the city’s immigrant communities, emphasizing his commitment to stand with those affected by the crackdown. “My responsibility is to be the mayor to each and every person that calls this city their home. That includes millions of immigrants, of which I am one,” Mamdani stated on X.

During a recent meeting with President Donald Trump, Mamdani raised concerns about the immigration raids directly, urging the administration to reconsider its approach. “When I met the President, I made it very clear that these kinds of raids are cruel and inhumane, that they do nothing to public safety,” he remarked.

Following his election victory, Mamdani reiterated his commitment to New York’s immigrant population in his victory speech, declaring, “New York will remain a city of immigrants: a city built by immigrants, powered by immigrants and, as of tonight, led by an immigrant.” He further asserted, “So, hear me, President Trump, when I say this: to get to any of us, you will have to get through all of us.”

Mamdani, a naturalized American citizen born in Uganda to Indian parents, has consistently emphasized the importance of protecting the city’s large immigrant population throughout his campaign. This message became a cornerstone of his run for office.

During the raid, demonstrators filled the streets chanting “ICE out of New York.” They formed human chains and even threw roadside planters at federal vehicles in a desperate attempt to prevent the agents from leaving a garage during the enforcement sweep.

As tensions escalated, police deployed pepper spray to disperse the crowd, leading to what officials later described as a violent clash, according to The Associated Press.

Murad Awawdeh, an immigrant rights advocate who now serves on Mamdani’s transition team, commended the demonstrators for their resilience. He characterized their actions as a powerful display of community solidarity against what he termed a “rogue, lawless” agency. “New York City is unlike any other place in this country or even the world, and what you have seen yesterday and time and again is that New Yorkers of all stripes, across all creeds, are not going to allow a rogue, lawless, violent and horrific agency to continue to mess with their neighbors,” he told TIME.

The recent events underscore the ongoing tensions surrounding immigration enforcement in the United States and the strong opposition from local communities, particularly in cities like New York that are home to diverse immigrant populations. Mamdani’s election and his vocal support for immigrants signal a potential shift in the city’s approach to immigration policy, as he prepares to take office.

As the situation continues to unfold, the response from both local leaders and community members will play a crucial role in shaping the future of immigration policy in New York City and beyond, according to The Guardian.

US Labor Market Weakens as Private Firms Cut Over 30,000 Jobs in November

The U.S. labor market is experiencing significant challenges, with private firms cutting over 30,000 jobs in November, according to a report from payrolls processing firm ADP.

The U.S. labor market is facing increasing difficulties, as highlighted in a recent report from payrolls processing firm ADP. The report indicates that the slowdown in the labor market intensified in November, with private companies cutting 32,000 jobs. Small businesses were particularly affected by this downturn.

This decline in payrolls marks a stark contrast to October, which saw an upwardly revised gain of 47,000 positions. The November figures also fell well below the Dow Jones consensus estimate from economists, who had anticipated an increase of 40,000 jobs.

“Hiring has been choppy of late as employers weather cautious consumers and an uncertain macroeconomic environment,” said Nela Richardson, Chief Economist at ADP. “While November’s slowdown was broad-based, it was led by a pullback among small businesses.”

The most significant job losses occurred in the professional and business services sector, which experienced a decline of 26,000 positions. Other sectors that shed jobs included information services, which lost approximately 20,000 jobs, and manufacturing, which saw a reduction of about 18,000 jobs. Financial activities and construction each recorded losses of 9,000 positions.

Throughout 2025, the U.S. labor market has shown clear signs of a slowdown following several years of robust post-pandemic growth. Although unemployment remains relatively low at around 4.1% in mid-2025, other indicators suggest a cooling labor market. For instance, job creation has weakened significantly; in January, employers added only 143,000 positions, falling short of economists’ expectations of roughly 170,000. The recent report also indicates a decrease of 32,000 in private-sector payrolls for November, hinting at potential contractions in various industries.

The employment-to-population ratio has dropped to approximately 59.7%, its lowest level since early 2022. Additionally, the number of job vacancies per unemployed person has declined, nearing pre-pandemic levels.

Several factors are contributing to this slowdown in the labor market. Economic growth has moderated compared to 2024, influenced by ongoing trade tensions, tariffs, and broader policy uncertainties. These elements appear to have dampened business investment and hiring practices.

The ADP report serves as the final jobs snapshot for the Federal Reserve ahead of its upcoming meeting on December 9-10. Futures traders are currently assigning a nearly 90% probability that the central bank will approve another quarter percentage point cut in its key interest rate. This decision comes despite some officials expressing concerns about the necessity of further easing.

The cooling labor market is influenced by slower economic growth, ongoing trade and policy uncertainties, and changing labor-supply conditions. These factors have led to more cautious hiring practices, selective layoffs, and, in some cases, temporary freezes on workforce expansion. The implications for monetary policy are significant, as the Federal Reserve’s forthcoming decisions on interest rates will be informed by the latest employment data. Policymakers must balance the need to control inflation with the necessity of sustaining labor-market momentum.

As the U.S. labor market enters a period of heightened caution and adjustment, employers, workers, and policymakers must navigate the uncertainties surrounding the persistence of these trends, sectoral disparities, and the potential impacts on wages and long-term economic growth. Worker confidence and spending may be influenced by perceived job insecurity and wage growth uncertainty, which could, in turn, affect broader economic activity.

Policy responses, including potential interest-rate adjustments, fiscal measures, or state-level interventions, may also play a crucial role in shaping the speed and effectiveness of the labor market’s recovery or adjustment.

Overall, the current state of the U.S. labor market reflects a complex interplay of various economic factors, necessitating careful monitoring and responsive strategies from all stakeholders involved.

According to ADP.

Dell Technologies Founder Commits $6.25 Billion for Children’s Trump Accounts

Dell Technologies founder Michael Dell has pledged $6.25 billion to establish investment accounts for 25 million American children, aiming to enhance financial inclusion and educational outcomes.

Dell Technologies founder Michael Dell is making headlines with a significant philanthropic commitment aimed at supporting American children. In a recent announcement, Michael and Susan Dell revealed their pledge of $6.25 billion to fund investment accounts for approximately 25 million children across the United States, an initiative linked to the name of former President Donald Trump.

In an interview with CNBC, Michael Dell explained the purpose of this initiative, stating, “It’s designed to help families feel supported from the start and encourage them to keep saving as their children grow.” He emphasized the long-term benefits of such accounts, noting that children with access to savings are statistically more likely to graduate from high school and college, purchase homes, start businesses, and are less likely to face incarceration.

This pledge is reportedly the largest ever made for American children, according to Invest America, a nonprofit advocacy organization collaborating with the Dells on this initiative. The Dells’ commitment aligns with a new federal program that enables parents to open tax-advantaged investment accounts for children under 18 who possess Social Security numbers.

Under this federal initiative, children born between 2025 and 2028 will receive a federal grant of $1,000 to initiate these so-called “Trump accounts.” Parents will have the opportunity to open and contribute to these accounts starting July 4, 2026, although specific guidance from the IRS is still pending.

Michael Dell expressed a desire to extend support beyond the federal program, stating, “We want to help the children that weren’t part of the government program.” This approach aims to ensure that children who may not have access to the federal seed money can still benefit from structured savings and investment opportunities.

The Dells’ initiative reflects a broader vision of financial inclusion, where access to savings accounts can foster educational achievement, homeownership, entrepreneurship, and ultimately reduce social risks over time. By contributing to this new federal investment account program, the Dells are not only providing immediate financial support but also highlighting the role of private philanthropy in complementing public programs.

While the program is still in its early stages, the potential impact will depend on participation rates and the performance of investments. Nevertheless, the Dells’ substantial donation sets a significant precedent for large-scale private support aimed at enhancing the lives of children, showcasing how strategic philanthropy can influence social and economic outcomes for future generations.

Michael Dell remarked on the importance of the federal program, saying, “It would have been impractical, or maybe even impossible, to impact this many kids in this way without such a program.” His comments underscore the critical role that both public and private efforts can play in addressing the financial needs of children and their families.

As the initiative unfolds, it will be closely watched by advocates for children’s welfare and financial education, marking a potentially transformative step in how investment accounts can be leveraged to promote long-term success for young Americans.

Source: Original article

Russia Increases U.S. Citizen’s Prison Sentence to 10 Years

Russia has extended the prison sentence of U.S. citizen Robert Gilman to 10 years after he was found guilty of assaulting prison staff, highlighting ongoing legal troubles since his arrest in 2022.

Russia has once again increased the prison sentence of U.S. citizen Robert Gilman, a former Marine, after a regional court found him guilty of assaulting prison staff. This ruling adds two years to his existing sentence, bringing the total to 10 years, according to reports from Reuters.

The latest extension occurred in the Voronezh region, where Gilman is currently serving his time. Prosecutors accused him of attacking two prison guards, and the court determined that this incident constituted a new offense that warranted additional punishment.

This development follows a troubling pattern of escalating charges against Gilman since his initial arrest in January 2022. His legal troubles began when passengers on a train reported him for being intoxicated and causing a disturbance. Transport police intervened, removing him from the train in Voronezh, where he was detained for petty hooliganism.

At the time of his arrest, Russian media reported that Gilman, who was traveling between Sochi and Moscow to replace a damaged passport, appeared heavily intoxicated. He later claimed in court that he believed his drink had been spiked.

Initially, Gilman was convicted in 2022 for assaulting a police officer, receiving a sentence of three and a half years. Prosecutors had recommended a longer sentence of four and a half years, given the circumstances of the case.

Reports indicate that Gilman bruised a Russian police officer with a kick while being forcibly removed from the train. His troubles escalated further in 2024 when he was found guilty of multiple assaults, including attacking a prison inspector during a cell check and beating another guard. These convictions resulted in a sentence of eight years and one month, which was compounded by the recent court decision.

Local media, including the business newspaper Kommersant, reported that Gilman admitted to some of the assaults. He stated that he began breaking prison rules after he was threatened with a transfer from his current detention facility, which he described as humane and where he could receive packages from relatives, to a maximum-security penal colony.

During the court proceedings on Wednesday, Gilman expressed remorse and explained his preference to remain in the Voronezh facility rather than face harsher conditions elsewhere. His lawyer, Irina Brazhnikova, informed the state-run TASS news agency that Gilman would not appeal the latest verdict.

Gilman is among at least nine Americans currently imprisoned in Russia, despite several high-profile prisoner exchanges that occurred in 2024 and 2025. Many of these individuals, like Gilman, have military backgrounds, including Michael Travis Leake and Gordon Black.

Supporters of Gilman in the United States argue that he was in poor health when he was first detained and contend that he was provoked into actions that led to the additional charges against him.

Source: Original article

US Institute of Peace Renamed for Trump Amid Agency Dismantling

The U.S. Institute of Peace has been officially renamed the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace, reflecting the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to dismantle the agency.

The U.S. Institute of Peace has undergone a significant rebranding, now officially known as the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace. This change marks a pivotal moment in the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to dismantle the congressionally established agency.

The name change follows a tumultuous year for the institute, which the Trump administration has targeted for closure while transferring its responsibilities to the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The agency has been embroiled in legal battles over the administration’s plans, with layoffs proceeding after an appeals court stayed a lower-court ruling that had temporarily blocked the shutdown.

On Wednesday morning, the agency’s website briefly went offline before returning with promotional material for an upcoming peace agreement ceremony between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda. This event is part of the administration’s broader narrative of achieving peace through diplomatic efforts.

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly defended the renaming, stating that the former institute was “a bloated, useless entity that blew $50 million per year while delivering no peace.” She emphasized that the newly named Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace serves as a testament to what she described as Trump’s successful leadership in global affairs.

“Now, the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace, which is both beautifully and aptly named after a President who ended eight wars in less than a year, will stand as a powerful reminder of what strong leadership can accomplish for global stability,” Kelly remarked. She framed the renaming as a recognition of Trump’s “peace through strength” approach, concluding with a celebratory “Congratulations, world!”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed Kelly’s sentiments in a post responding to the announcement. He stated, “President Trump will be remembered by history as the President of Peace. It’s time our State Department display that.” This statement underscores the administration’s intention to reshape the narrative surrounding Trump’s foreign policy legacy.

The U.S. Institute of Peace was established by Congress in 1984 as a nonpartisan organization dedicated to supporting conflict prevention and peace-building efforts globally. The rebranding and dismantling of the agency represent one of the most extensive overhauls of a federal agency during Trump’s second term.

Earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell ruled that the administration’s efforts to shut down the institute were unlawful. However, this ruling was stayed on appeal, allowing the administration to proceed with layoffs and restructuring as it continued to transfer functions to other entities.

The institute did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the rebranding or the status of its ongoing legal challenges. Similarly, the State Department has yet to provide a response to inquiries about the implications of the name change.

The renaming of the U.S. Institute of Peace to the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace is a clear indication of the administration’s commitment to reshaping federal agencies in line with its political agenda, while also attempting to solidify Trump’s legacy as a peacemaker.

Source: Original article

Macron Advocates for Europe’s Role in Ukraine Peace Negotiations

French President Emmanuel Macron and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky met in Paris to discuss Europe’s role in Ukraine peace talks amid ongoing conflict and international diplomatic efforts.

French President Emmanuel Macron hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Paris on Monday, marking a significant moment in the ongoing diplomatic efforts surrounding the war in Ukraine. Macron characterized this juncture as potentially decisive for both European security and the future of the conflict, which has persisted for nearly four years.

The high-level meeting comes as international stakeholders intensify their efforts to establish a framework for a possible ceasefire in the war between Ukraine and Russia. Zelensky’s visit followed constructive discussions between Ukrainian and American officials in Florida, where revisions to a U.S.-drafted proposal were reviewed. This proposal had previously faced criticism for favoring Russia too heavily in its terms.

European governments have expressed strong reservations about the draft, emphasizing the necessity of fully respecting Ukraine’s sovereignty. Macron underscored that negotiations remain in the preliminary stages and reiterated that only Ukraine has the authority to make decisions regarding its territorial integrity.

“Ukraine alone can speak for its territory as a sovereign nation,” Macron stated, while also acknowledging the ongoing peace efforts led by Washington.

Macron further asserted that Europe must play a direct role in shaping any final agreement regarding Ukraine’s future. He highlighted the importance of upcoming discussions between U.S. officials and Western partners, which he believes will clarify Washington’s role in post-war security arrangements.

“Questions related to frozen assets, security guarantees, future sanctions, and European Union accession cannot be resolved without Europeans at the table,” he emphasized.

During the meeting, Macron condemned Russia’s ongoing military actions, noting that Moscow has escalated its attacks even as peace negotiations are being discussed. “At a moment when peace is being talked about, Russia continues to attack and destroy,” he remarked.

Zelensky echoed these sentiments, pointing out that Russia has recently intensified missile and drone strikes in an effort to undermine public morale in Ukraine.

In terms of sanctions, Macron predicted that pressure on Russia’s energy sector would reach unprecedented levels in the coming weeks. “The pressure on Russia’s oil and gas industry will soon be the strongest since the start of the invasion. This will significantly affect the Russian economy,” he stated.

Earlier in the day, Macron and Zelensky held consultations with several European leaders, including representatives from Britain, Germany, Poland, Italy, Norway, Finland, Denmark, and the Netherlands. Officials from the European Union, such as Ursula von der Leyen and Antonio Costa, along with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, also participated in the discussions. Following their meeting, Macron and Zelensky spoke by phone with U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff to further discuss the situation.

Meanwhile, U.S. and Russian diplomatic efforts continue. Former President Donald Trump has recently downplayed a previously proposed 28-point U.S. peace framework, which included restrictions on Ukraine’s military, blocked NATO membership, and demanded territorial concessions. Trump described the proposal as a draft concept that remains open to modification.

In a related development, the Kremlin confirmed that Russian President Vladimir Putin is scheduled to meet with Witkoff this week. The role of the U.S. envoy has sparked controversy, particularly following reports suggesting he may have advised Moscow on how to present its position to Washington.

As diplomatic efforts evolve, the focus remains on ensuring that European voices are integral to any resolution regarding the conflict in Ukraine, underscoring the complexity and urgency of the situation.

Source: Original article

India to Host Putin, Strengthening Ties Amid U.S. Tariffs

India is set to host Russian President Vladimir Putin in early December, emphasizing its commitment to strengthening ties with Moscow amid U.S. trade penalties over Russian oil imports.

India is preparing to welcome Russian President Vladimir Putin for a two-day visit on December 4–5, marking the 23rd annual India-Russia summit. This visit underscores New Delhi’s intent to bolster strategic and economic cooperation with Moscow, even as it faces significant trade penalties from the United States related to Russian oil imports.

During the summit, discussions are expected to center on expanding trade, enhancing defense cooperation, and fostering long-term strategic partnerships. Political risk analyst Ian Bremmer from Eurasia Group noted that the visit reflects India’s desire to maintain close ties with Russia, especially as it perceives the United States as increasingly unpredictable and views China as a strategic rival.

Chietigj Bajpaee, a South Asia expert at Chatham House, emphasized that the summit highlights India’s commitment to an independent foreign policy, irrespective of pressure from Washington. The Kremlin has characterized the upcoming visit as highly significant, with Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi set to discuss their “special and privileged strategic partnership,” encompassing politics, trade, and economic collaboration. Several bilateral business and government agreements are anticipated to be signed during the summit.

Trade expansion is expected to take center stage at the summit, particularly as New Delhi aims to address the stark imbalance in bilateral commerce. According to the India Brand Equity Foundation, total trade between India and Russia reached $68.7 billion in the fiscal year ending March 2025. However, Indian exports accounted for only $4.9 billion, while imports from Russia surged to $63.8 billion.

Both nations have set an ambitious goal to elevate bilateral trade to $100 billion by 2030. India plans to increase exports of pharmaceuticals, chemicals, food products, and industrial machinery, while Russia is offering enhanced cooperation in civilian nuclear technology, including the construction of small modular nuclear reactors.

Defense and civil nuclear collaboration remain key pillars of the India-Russia relationship. However, some analysts express concerns about Russia’s ability to fulfill major arms deals due to ongoing supply-chain constraints. Between 2020 and 2024, Russia accounted for 36% of India’s total arms imports, followed closely by France at 33% and Israel at 13%, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Nonetheless, Russia’s share has been steadily declining as India diversifies its defense suppliers.

India’s outreach to Russia occurs amid increasing economic pressure from the United States. The U.S. has imposed a cumulative 50% tariff on certain Indian goods as a penalty for India’s continued purchases of discounted Russian oil. These tariffs, among the highest imposed on any nation, took effect in late August.

Washington has accused New Delhi of importing Russian crude and reselling refined products internationally at a profit, effectively supporting Moscow’s war economy. Indian officials have defended their position, asserting that oil imports are essential to meet the energy needs of over 1.4 billion residents.

In an effort to maintain relations with the U.S., India has increased energy imports from American suppliers. Recently, Indian state-owned refiners signed a one-year agreement to import 2.2 million tonnes of liquefied petroleum gas from the U.S.

Meanwhile, recent U.S. sanctions on Russian energy giants Rosneft and Lukoil have temporarily slowed Russian crude shipments to India. However, analysts at Kpler anticipate that flows will rebound through alternative trading structures.

Geopolitical advisors estimate that the absence of a long-term U.S.-India trade pact could result in India losing up to $20 billion in trade surplus. In contrast, discounted Russian oil currently saves India approximately $8 billion annually, highlighting the economic stakes involved in New Delhi’s balancing act.

Putin’s visit to India coincides with renewed U.S. efforts to negotiate an end to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. Earlier this week, Putin engaged in extensive talks in Moscow with U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. The Kremlin described these discussions as constructive, although no significant breakthroughs were reported.

India has a vested interest in achieving a peaceful resolution to the conflict, as it would alleviate international scrutiny of its partnership with Russia and contribute to stabilizing global energy markets.

Source: Original article

New Email Scam Employs Hidden Characters to Bypass Filters

Researchers have identified a new phishing scam that uses invisible characters in email subject lines to bypass security filters, prompting experts to recommend enhanced protective measures.

Cybercriminals are constantly evolving their tactics, and email remains a primary tool for their schemes. Over the years, users have encountered everything from fake courier notifications to sophisticated AI-generated scams. While email filters have improved, attackers have adapted their strategies to exploit vulnerabilities. The latest technique focuses on a subtle yet impactful aspect: the email subject line.

Recent research has revealed that some phishing campaigns are embedding invisible characters, specifically soft hyphens, between each letter in the subject line. These Unicode characters, which are typically used for text formatting, are not visible in the inbox, rendering traditional keyword-based filters ineffective. By utilizing MIME encoded-word formatting and encoding in UTF-8 and Base64, attackers can seamlessly integrate these hidden characters into the subject line.

For instance, an analyzed email decoded to read “Your Password is About to Expire,” with a soft hyphen inserted between every character. While the subject appears normal to the recipient, it appears jumbled to security filters, which struggle to identify clear keywords. This technique is also applied within the body of the email, allowing both layers to evade detection. The link in these emails typically directs users to a counterfeit login page hosted on a compromised domain, aimed at harvesting sensitive credentials.

This phishing method is particularly dangerous due to its ability to bypass established security measures. Most phishing filters rely on pattern recognition, scanning for suspicious words, common phrases, and known malicious domains. By fragmenting the text with invisible characters, attackers disrupt these patterns, making the email appear legitimate to users while remaining undetectable by automated systems.

The simplicity of this method is alarming. The tools required to encode these messages are widely accessible, allowing attackers to automate the process and launch large-scale campaigns with minimal effort. Since the characters are invisible in most email clients, even tech-savvy users may not notice anything amiss at first glance.

Security experts note that while this technique has been used in email bodies for years, its application in subject lines is less common, making it harder for existing filters to catch. Subject lines play a crucial role in shaping first impressions; if the subject appears familiar and urgent, users are more likely to open the email, giving attackers an advantage.

Phishing emails often mimic legitimate communications, but the links contained within them can lead to dangerous sites. Scammers frequently disguise harmful URLs behind seemingly innocuous text, hoping users will click without verifying. One effective way to preview a link is by using a private email service that reveals the actual destination before the browser loads it.

To enhance security, users are encouraged to adopt several best practices. Utilizing a password manager can help create strong, unique passwords for every account. Even if a phishing email successfully deceives a user, the attacker will be unable to exploit the password elsewhere due to its uniqueness. Many password managers also provide alerts for suspicious sites.

Additionally, users should check if their email addresses have been exposed in previous data breaches. The top-rated password managers often include built-in breach scanners that notify users if their credentials have appeared in known leaks. If a match is found, it is crucial to change any reused passwords and secure those accounts with new, unique credentials.

Enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) adds an extra layer of security to the login process. Even if a password is compromised, an attacker would still need the verification code sent to the user’s phone, effectively thwarting most phishing attempts.

Robust antivirus software is another essential tool. Beyond scanning for malware, many antivirus programs can flag unsafe pages, block suspicious redirects, and alert users before they enter details on a fraudulent login page. This additional layer of protection is invaluable when an email manages to slip past filters.

Reducing one’s digital footprint can also make it more challenging for attackers to craft convincing phishing messages. Personal data removal services can assist in cleaning up exposed information and old database leaks. While no service can guarantee complete removal of data from the internet, these services actively monitor and systematically erase personal information from numerous websites, providing peace of mind.

Users should not rely solely on the display name of an email. It is essential to verify the full email address, as attackers often make slight modifications to domain names. If something seems off, it is safer to visit the website directly rather than clicking any links in the email.

When receiving emails that claim urgent actions are needed, such as password expirations, it is wise to avoid clicking links. Instead, users should navigate to the website directly to check their account settings. Phishing emails thrive on urgency, so taking a moment to confirm the issue independently can mitigate risks.

Keeping software up to date is another critical defense. Updates often include security fixes that address vulnerabilities exploited by attackers. Cybercriminals tend to target outdated systems, making it crucial to stay ahead of known weaknesses.

Many email providers, such as Gmail, Outlook, and Yahoo, offer options to tighten spam filtering settings. While this may not catch every instance of the soft-hyphen scam, it can improve the odds and reduce the overall volume of risky emails. Additionally, modern web browsers like Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Brave, and Edge include anti-phishing checks, providing an extra safety net if a user accidentally clicks a malicious link.

As phishing attacks continue to evolve, techniques like the use of invisible characters highlight the creativity of cybercriminals. While filters and scanners are improving, they cannot catch everything, especially when the text presented to users differs from what automated systems detect. Staying safe requires a combination of good habits, the right tools, and a healthy dose of skepticism when confronted with urgent emails.

Do you trust your email filters, or do you double-check suspicious messages yourself? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

Source: Original article

Nayna Gupta Testifies on Deportation’s Impact on Families and Communities

Nayna Gupta, Policy Director of the American Immigration Council, testified at a Shadow Hearing on September 18, 2025, addressing the impact of deportation on families and communities.

On September 18, 2025, Nayna Gupta, the Policy Director of the American Immigration Council, provided critical testimony at a Shadow Hearing organized by U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal (WA-07). Jayapal, who serves as the Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Immigration, Integrity, Security, and Enforcement, hosted the hearing titled “Kidnapped and Disappeared: Trump’s Assault Destroys U.S. Families and Communities.” This event marks the third in a series led by Rep. Jayapal that seeks to illuminate the profound human costs associated with deportation policies.

During her testimony, Gupta emphasized the far-reaching consequences of current deportation practices. She articulated how these policies not only tear families apart but also destabilize entire communities. Gupta pointed out that the emotional and psychological toll on families affected by deportation is immense, often leading to long-lasting trauma.

Gupta further criticized the erosion of due process and fairness within the U.S. immigration system. She argued that the existing policies undermine the foundational values of justice and dignity that should characterize America. Gupta’s remarks reflect a growing concern among advocates about the implications of deportation on civil liberties and human rights.

At the American Immigration Council, Gupta and her colleagues are dedicated to fostering an immigration system that prioritizes family unity, upholds due process, and embodies the principles of justice and dignity. The Council’s mission is to advocate for reforms that protect vulnerable populations and ensure that the immigration system operates fairly and equitably.

As the discussion surrounding immigration continues to evolve, Gupta’s testimony serves as a poignant reminder of the real-life impacts of policy decisions on families and communities across the nation. The Shadow Hearing not only sheds light on the challenges faced by those affected by deportation but also calls for a reevaluation of the values that guide U.S. immigration policy.

According to American Immigration Council, Gupta’s insights resonate with a broader movement advocating for humane immigration reform that recognizes the dignity of all individuals.

Source: Original article

Britain’s Use of India’s Wealth to Safeguard Its Treasury in the 19th Century

Recent examinations of British parliamentary archives reveal that Britain’s primary goal in India during the 19th century was to safeguard its treasury from the financial burdens of colonial expansion.

Freshly examined British parliamentary archives from the early 19th century reveal a striking reality about imperial policy: Britain’s primary objective in India was not governance, reform, or even commercial gain — but the protection of England’s own treasury from the crushing debts created by colonial expansion.

During the rule of Marquess Wellesley, Britain launched costly military campaigns against the Maratha Confederacy and annexed prosperous kingdoms such as Awadh. Although celebrated in London as imperial victories, these conquests were largely financed through high-interest borrowing within India itself. Within a short period, India’s public debt skyrocketed from £11 million to more than £31 million.

As these liabilities began to alarm British lawmakers, parliamentary debates in 1805–06 exposed the true imperial anxiety: safeguarding the British Exchequer from the economic fallout of its own empire. Veteran parliamentarian Philip Francis declared that his aim was to protect Britain “not from the Company, but from India and its government,” warning that financial collapse in the colony could recoil onto the British economy itself.

Criticism in Parliament centered on what was described as Wellesley’s reckless extravagance. His administration replaced the fiscal restraint expected from the East India Company with princely opulence and unchecked military spending.

One of the most controversial expenditures was the construction of Government House in Calcutta at a cost of £220,000 — a figure that MPs said rivaled even the grandest Eastern courts. Wellesley also faced allegations of personally accepting £120,000 from Indian sources in violation of Company rules.

Military loans carried nominal interest rates of 10–12 percent, but British lawmakers revealed that local financial practices pushed the real burden closer to 16 percent. As one MP grimly summarized, India had become “a vast machine for manufacturing debt.”

When Lord Cornwallis returned as Governor-General in 1805 to restore stability, he found the colonial treasury in near collapse. Soldiers had gone unpaid for months, civil administration lagged even further behind, and a sprawling irregular army drained £60,000 every month.

In a desperate attempt to keep the government functioning, Cornwallis seized £250,000 earmarked for China trade and ordered Madras to surrender £50,000 of its own funds. These emergency measures illustrated how close British India was to outright insolvency.

Under its 1793 charter renewal, the East India Company was legally required to remit £500,000 annually to the British government from its profits. Yet Parliament discovered that not a penny of this obligation had ever been paid. Instead, soaring Indian debt exposed the illusion that the colony was financially sustaining the empire.

India, once projected as Britain’s greatest imperial asset, was now increasingly viewed as an economic vulnerability.

Politicians began to fear that colonial debt could destabilize Britain itself. Francis warned that economic disasters originating in India would not remain confined there. Costly wars, he argued, had consumed men and money without generating sustainable revenue.

The solution proposed by Viscount Castlereagh was to shift the burden to Britain itself through a massive, government-backed refinancing scheme. His plan was to convert £16–17 million of high-interest Indian debt into lower-interest European loans guaranteed by British credit — reducing annual debt servicing by about £800,000.

The revenues of India were pledged as permanent security. Castlereagh assured Parliament that these revenues were as dependable as those of Ireland and could not fail short of Britain being expelled entirely from India.

While the plan stabilized British finances, it entrenched India’s economic subordination. The colony’s revenues were now permanently pledged to protect British credit markets. Rather than relieving India’s burden, the restructuring ensured that colonial wealth would continue flowing outward to secure London’s fiscal safety.

These archival debates make one point unmistakably clear: Britain’s fundamental foreign-policy objective in India was not the welfare of the colony, but the financial protection of the imperial center. Conquest brought prestige — but it was India’s mortgaged wealth that ultimately guaranteed Britain’s economic security.

Source: Original article

Prada Group Completes $1.37 Billion Acquisition of Versace

The Prada Group has acquired luxury fashion label Versace for $1.37 billion, consolidating its position among Italy’s premier fashion brands.

MUMBAI – The Prada Group announced on December 2 that it has officially acquired the luxury fashion label Versace in a deal valued at $1.37 billion.

This acquisition means that Versace will now operate alongside Prada and Miu Miu, uniting some of Italy’s most influential fashion brands under one corporate umbrella.

The transaction marks the end of Versace’s ownership under Capri Holdings, the U.S.-based luxury group that managed the brand through the challenging post-pandemic years.

Capri Holdings indicated that the proceeds from the sale will be utilized to repay a significant portion of its debt, thereby enhancing its financial stability and providing greater flexibility for future investments.

John D. Idol, Chairman and CEO of Capri Holdings, stated that the sale is a strategic move to alleviate the company’s debt burden and improve its leverage ratio. He emphasized that Capri will now concentrate on expanding its remaining brands—Michael Kors and Jimmy Choo—and anticipates stabilizing operations this year, with a return to growth expected by fiscal 2027.

Versace has encountered challenges in recent years, including slower retail growth following 2022 and a mixed performance in early 2025.

With this acquisition, Versace will join Prada’s global portfolio, which is renowned for its innovative fashion, meticulous tailoring, and selective distribution strategies.

Industry analysts suggest that this deal could streamline manufacturing, distribution, and pricing strategies across the brands. Additionally, it may provide Versace with improved access to capital and enhanced long-term planning capabilities under Prada’s management.

As the fashion industry continues to evolve, this acquisition represents a significant shift in the luxury market landscape, potentially setting the stage for new growth opportunities for both Prada and Versace.

Source: Original article

Special Election Results for Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District

Republican Matt Van Epps secured a victory over Democrat Aftyn Behn in the special election for Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District, highlighting challenges for Democrats in competitive races.

In a closely watched special election on Tuesday, Republican Matt Van Epps defeated Democrat Aftyn Behn to represent Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District. This race serves as a significant indicator of the political landscape as the 2024 elections approach.

Historically, flipping seats in special elections for House positions proves to be a challenging endeavor. While the party challenging the incumbent may create a competitive race, such instances often reflect underlying weaknesses within the ruling party or the presidency itself. The Democrats, for instance, came close in several special elections in 2017 but ultimately did not secure any victories. Over the past 18 years, only four major “flips” have occurred in House special elections.

Van Epps’ victory raises questions about the Democratic strategy in this district. Some analysts suggest that Behn’s progressive stance may have hindered her chances. A more moderate candidate might have performed better, particularly in light of Abigail Spanberger’s success in the Virginia gubernatorial race, which showcased the potential appeal of centrist policies.

The implications of Van Epps’ win extend beyond this single election. It may embolden other Republicans to consider leaving their posts, as the House majority now stands at 220-214. Some GOP members may feel secure enough to depart, especially with the impending exit of Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene in January.

Moderate Republicans are likely to scrutinize the outcomes of this race, particularly regarding healthcare issues. The competitive nature of the election in a district that leans heavily Republican (with a plus-20 advantage) may prompt calls for the party to address key issues that resonate with voters.

The results also signal potential challenges for moderate Republicans in other states, including California and New York, as they prepare for the upcoming midterms. The Democratic strength demonstrated in this race could serve as a warning sign for those in competitive districts.

Looking back at the 2018 elections, Democrats successfully flipped the House after coming close in several special elections. The outcome of the Van Epps-Behn race underscores the effectiveness of gerrymandering and redistricting strategies employed by Tennessee Republicans. By drawing former Democratic Rep. Jim Cooper and other Democrats out of a Nashville-area district, the GOP effectively diluted the Democratic vote across multiple districts, contributing to their success in Tuesday’s election.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the implications of this special election will likely resonate throughout the upcoming electoral cycle, shaping strategies for both parties as they prepare for the challenges ahead.

Source: Original article

Sen. Bernie Moreno Advocates for Exclusive Citizenship Act to End Dual Nationality

Sen. Bernie Moreno has introduced the “Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025,” which aims to eliminate dual nationality and reinforce the principle of undivided loyalty to the United States.

Senator Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) has unveiled new legislation designed to reaffirm the notion that U.S. citizenship entails undivided national loyalty. The proposed bill, titled the “Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025,” seeks to establish that citizens of the United States “must have sole and exclusive allegiance to the U.S.”

This legislation directly targets dual nationality, stipulating that individuals would not be permitted to maintain U.S. citizenship while also holding citizenship in another country. Should the bill become law, any American who voluntarily acquires foreign citizenship would be required to relinquish their U.S. citizenship effective from the date the measure takes effect.

Individuals currently holding dual citizenship would need to file a written renunciation of their foreign citizenship with the Secretary of State or submit a written renunciation of their U.S. citizenship to the Secretary of Homeland Security within one year of the law’s enactment.

According to the bill, those who fail to comply with these requirements would be considered to have voluntarily relinquished their U.S. citizenship under section 349(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

The legislation also mandates that the Secretary of State establish regulations and procedures for declaring, verifying, and maintaining records of exclusive citizenship. Additionally, it requires collaboration with the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security to ensure that individuals determined to have relinquished their citizenship are accurately recorded in federal systems and treated as aliens under immigration laws.

“Being an American citizen is an honor and a privilege — and if you want to be an American, it’s all or nothing. It’s time to end dual citizenship for good,” Moreno stated.

If approved by Congress, the measure would take effect 180 days after being signed into law.

Historically, the Supreme Court has upheld dual citizenship as a constitutional right. In the landmark case Talbot v. Jansen (1795), the court ruled that Americans who acquire another citizenship do not have to forfeit their U.S. citizenship. Similarly, in Afroyim v. Rusk (1967), the court determined that a U.S. citizen cannot be stripped of their citizenship unless they willingly choose to renounce it.

While the U.S. government does not track the exact number of Americans with dual citizenship, estimates suggest that the figure is substantial. According to International Living, over 40 million Americans, including a significant number of Mexican Americans, are eligible for dual citizenship.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Tariffs Impact U.S. Manufacturing Growth Across Industries

The U.S. manufacturing sector continues to struggle under the weight of President Trump’s tariffs, with only four industries reporting growth as uncertainty looms.

The U.S. manufacturing sector is grappling with the ongoing uncertainty stemming from President Donald Trump’s tariffs. In November, manufacturing activity contracted for the ninth consecutive month, as factories faced declining orders and rising input costs due to the persistent impact of import tariffs.

“The manufacturing sector continues to be weighed down by the unpredictable tariffs landscape,” stated Stephen Stanley, chief U.S. economist at Santander U.S. Capital Markets.

Since his return to office in January, President Trump has pursued an aggressive tariff agenda aimed at reshoring production, protecting domestic industries, and reducing reliance on foreign-made industrial inputs. A significant aspect of this agenda has been the substantial increase in tariffs on steel and aluminum, among other goods.

These tariffs were introduced under the pretext of national security and “economic sovereignty,” reviving and expanding the tariff framework first established during Trump’s earlier presidency. By mid-2025, tariffs on imported steel and aluminum had soared to approximately 50%.

The administration contends that these tariff hikes are essential for leveling the playing field for U.S. manufacturers and addressing what it describes as unfair foreign subsidies, dumping practices, and dependency risks. Proponents argue that the elevated tariffs have bolstered competitiveness for certain domestic producers of raw materials, particularly in the steel and aluminum sectors.

Historically viewed as foundational for national defense and large-scale infrastructure projects, these industries have experienced modest improvements in pricing power and investment sentiment. The White House asserts that these measures will foster long-term reshoring, enhance factory investment, and secure American supply chains against geopolitical shocks.

However, the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) survey released recently revealed that some manufacturers in the transportation equipment sector are linking layoffs to Trump’s sweeping tariffs. They reported, “We are starting to institute more permanent changes due to the tariff environment,” which includes staff reductions, new guidance to shareholders, and the development of additional offshore manufacturing that would have otherwise been intended for U.S. export.

The ongoing uncertainty generated by President Trump’s tariffs has left the U.S. manufacturing landscape fraught with challenges. While certain sectors, such as steel and aluminum, have seen slight gains in pricing power, the overall sentiment remains cautious. The administration frames these tariffs as necessary for protecting domestic industries, bolstering investment, and encouraging reshoring.

Despite the administration’s defense of the tariffs as vital for safeguarding domestic manufacturing, economists argue that restoring the industry to its former strength is unlikely due to underlying structural issues, including a shortage of skilled workers.

“We can see no sign in this report of a surge in manufacturing in the United States since the tariff regime was unveiled last spring,” remarked Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics. “The manufacturing sector is sick.”

According to the ISM survey, only four industries, including computer and electronic products and machinery, reported growth amid the prevailing challenges.

Source: Original article

Average U.S. Visa Wait Times Decrease in Major Cities

The U.S. State Department has reported a decline in average visa wait times across several key cities, although the interview waiver option is no longer available for most visa categories.

The U.S. State Department has recently updated its visa appointment wait times, revealing notable changes across various cities. One significant alteration is the discontinuation of the interview waiver option, commonly referred to as the “Dropbox” facility, which is no longer available for most visa categories, including temporary work visas and F-1 student visas. This change impacts a broad spectrum of travelers who previously relied on this expedited, paperwork-only process.

According to the BAL U.S. Practice Group, New Delhi has seen a dramatic reduction in wait times for F, M, and J visas. The wait time has decreased from approximately two months to about half a month, providing relief for many applicants in this category.

In contrast, Shanghai has experienced a significant increase in wait times for H, L, O, P, and Q visa appointments. These wait times have surged from under half a month to around three months, a notable rise compared to the figures reported in the global update from October.

Chennai (Madras) has also recorded a significant shift in wait times for B-1/B-2 visas, with average wait times moving from five months to “N/A.” The next available appointments for interviews have decreased from a five-month wait to three months since October.

New Delhi has similarly improved its B-1/B-2 interview-required wait times, which have dropped from 6.5 months to 3.5 months over the same period. However, some cities continue to experience lengthy wait times for these types of visas.

The cities with the longest wait times for B-1/B-2 interview-required visas include Toronto at 16.5 months, San Jose at 13 months, Lagos at 12.5 months, Merida at 11.5 months, and Ottawa at 11 months. While most petition-based work visas that require interviews fall within a wait window of under half a month to about three months, a few locations remain notable exceptions.

Overall, the latest global wait times in major visa-issuing cities show little movement. For work visas (H, L, O, P, Q) and student or exchange visitor categories (F, M, J), the next available interview dates have largely remained steady compared to the previous month across the key cities being tracked.

The U.S. State Department’s monthly updates provide reported wait times that reflect the average duration for non-immigrant visa interviews and an estimate for the next available visitor visa appointment. However, these averages do not guarantee that any individual applicant will secure an appointment within that timeframe.

U.S. embassies and consulates often open additional appointment slots, meaning new dates can become available regularly. The State Department counts months in 30-day increments and half months in 15-day increments, including weekends and holidays when embassies are closed. Once an interview is booked, applicants can monitor the scheduling system and reschedule to an earlier slot if one opens up.

As the visa landscape continues to evolve, applicants are encouraged to stay informed about the latest updates and changes to the appointment process.

Source: Original article

Democrats Investigate Kash Patel’s Alleged Personal Use of FBI Jet

Senior Democrats have initiated an inquiry into FBI Director Kash Patel over allegations of personal use of a government Gulfstream jet for non-official travel.

Senior Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee have launched a formal inquiry into FBI Director Kash Patel amid allegations that he used an FBI Gulfstream aircraft for personal travel, including recreational and social trips.

The investigation was prompted by multiple media reports suggesting that Patel utilized the government jet to attend non-official events. Notably, these events included a sporting occasion in Pennsylvania where his girlfriend performed, as well as subsequent travel to Tennessee and Texas. The inquiry is being spearheaded by Jamie Raskin, the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, alongside Sydney Kamlager-Dove.

In a formal letter addressed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the lawmakers have requested comprehensive documentation regarding Patel’s recent travel. This includes flight logs, passenger lists, and any communications related to the trips in question.

One of the trips under scrutiny involved Patel’s flight to Pennsylvania State University on October 25, where he attended a wrestling event featuring his girlfriend. The following day, he reportedly returned to Nashville with her aboard the FBI aircraft. The lawmakers noted that this trip appeared to lack any visible connection to official FBI responsibilities.

The inquiry also raises questions about a later trip to San Angelo, Texas, where Patel allegedly spent four days at a luxury hunting property known as Boondoggle Ranch. This property is reportedly associated with Republican mega-donor Bubba Saulsbury. Lawmakers are questioning whether this visit served any legitimate government purpose.

As of now, the FBI has not publicly responded to the allegations. Although the Democratic members have formally requested the relevant documents by December 15, they currently lack subpoena power as the minority party, which limits their ability to compel compliance.

In their correspondence, Raskin and Kamlager-Dove emphasized that FBI aircraft are taxpayer-funded assets, asserting that government planes “are not personal property but belong to the American people.”

This inquiry is not the first instance of scrutiny regarding Patel’s use of FBI aircraft. In May, CBS News reported that Senate Democrats had requested a review from the Government Accountability Office concerning his travel. According to that report, Patel had flown multiple times to Las Vegas, where he owns a home, and to Nashville, where his girlfriend resides.

Under executive branch policy, FBI directors are required to use government aircraft for both official and personal flights to ensure secure communications and emergency readiness. However, any personal travel must be reimbursed at standard commercial airfare rates, including costs for any accompanying companions. While family and friends may accompany the director, their transportation expenses must also be repaid.

Lawmakers are now seeking to verify whether Patel adhered to these reimbursement procedures and whether his recent flights complied with federal ethics and travel regulations.

Source: Original article

Heavy Snow Causes School Closures as New York Prepares for Nor’easter

Severe winter weather is causing widespread school closures across the U.S., with a powerful Nor’easter expected to impact New York City and the Northeast.

Severe winter weather continues to disrupt daily life across multiple parts of the United States. Heavy snowfall, plunging temperatures, and hazardous road conditions have prompted widespread school and college closures. A powerful Nor’easter is forecast to reach New York City on Tuesday, raising concerns about commuter safety across the Northeast.

School Closures in Michigan

In Michigan, several school districts in St. Joseph County announced closures for Monday due to dangerous icy conditions that developed overnight. This decision follows a weekend snowstorm that dropped up to 12 inches of snow in some areas, making back roads particularly unsafe.

Local administrators in neighboring counties are closely monitoring conditions due to similar risks. Rural districts remain the most vulnerable to closures across:

Oceana County, where road conditions are highly unstable; Newaygo County, where officials are assessing worsening ice buildup; Mecosta County, where transportation safety reviews are underway; and Montcalm County, where potential shutdowns are under active consideration.

In contrast, school systems in Ottawa County and the Grand Rapids metropolitan area are expected to face minimal closure risk.

College Class Cancellations

Severe weather has also disrupted higher education schedules in the Midwest. Iowa State University canceled all daytime and evening classes for Monday, citing dangerous travel conditions following the Thanksgiving holiday. While campus facilities will remain open, snow-clearing crews are actively treating roads and walkways. Staff unable to report in person have been advised to seek supervisor approval for remote work.

The University of Northern Iowa also suspended all Monday classes, allowing students additional time to return safely. In-person instruction is scheduled to resume on Tuesday.

Nor’easter Threatens New York and Northeast

Meteorologists are warning that 12 to 16 hours of rain and snow could blanket New York City as the Nor’easter moves in early Tuesday morning, around 6 a.m. Slippery roads and reduced visibility are expected to complicate commutes following the holiday weekend.

Other major cities likely to experience similar weather conditions include Baltimore, Washington D.C., Philadelphia, and Boston, according to regional forecasts.

Northern New Jersey, sections of the lower Hudson Valley, and parts of Connecticut may receive up to three inches of snow, while areas farther north—from Albany to Bangor, Maine—could record snowfall totals as high as eight inches.

Safety Advisory

Authorities are urging residents to avoid unnecessary travel, drive cautiously on untreated roads, and stay updated with local weather alerts. Students and commuters are advised to prioritize safety as winter storm conditions continue to intensify across much of the country.

Source: Original article

High-Stakes U.S. Efforts for Ukraine Peace Face Challenges in Moscow

White House envoy Steve Witkoff is in Moscow for critical talks with President Putin, following negotiations with Ukraine aimed at securing a peace deal amid ongoing territorial disputes.

White House envoy Steve Witkoff arrived in Moscow on Tuesday for crucial discussions with Russian President Vladimir Putin. This visit follows a weekend of negotiations with Ukrainian officials focused on a 19-point proposal aimed at achieving a peace deal.

Witkoff, alongside Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and occasional foreign policy advisor, is exploring whether Putin will show flexibility regarding the proposal finalized with Ukrainian counterparts. This latest round of diplomacy marks the most significant effort toward a potential settlement since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Despite the momentum, significant obstacles remain. Core issues regarding territorial disputes, Ukraine’s long-term security arrangements, and the conditions for any ceasefire have yet to be resolved. Negotiators emphasize that progress will hinge on Putin’s willingness to compromise during this week’s meetings.

After an initial 28-point plan, which was perceived by Kyiv as overly favorable to Moscow, U.S. and Ukrainian officials returned to the drawing board. They convened in Geneva at the end of November to refine the plan and again met over the weekend in Florida to finalize additional details.

Both sides described the talks as productive but refrained from providing specifics on the unresolved issues. Secretary of State Marco Rubio remarked, “So much work remains. But today was again a very productive and useful session where I think additional progress was made.” Trump expressed optimism, stating, “There’s a good chance we can make a deal.”

However, despite the apparent progress, the two sides remain far apart on several sensitive topics. Russia continues to assert that Ukraine cannot join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), despite Ukraine’s constitutional amendment designating NATO membership as a national objective. The original 28-point plan also included a demand for Ukraine to reduce its peacetime armed forces to 600,000, while European and Ukrainian officials proposed an 800,000 cap. Currently, Ukraine fields approximately 880,000 troops, a significant increase from around 209,000 before the invasion in 2022.

The most significant impasse lies in territorial concessions. Earlier drafts suggested recognizing Crimea and substantial portions of the Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia regions as de facto Russian territory. This issue has become even more complicated with the recent resignation of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s chief of staff and chief negotiator, Andriy Yermak, following a corruption investigation that led to a raid on his home. Yermak had previously stated that Ukraine would not concede land for peace, asserting, “Not a single sane person today would sign a document to give up territory.”

At the end of November, Putin indicated a willingness for “serious” talks but maintained that Russia holds the upper hand in the conflict. He asserted that Russia would only cease hostilities if Ukrainian forces withdrew from territories they had recaptured. “If they don’t withdraw, we will achieve this by force,” he stated.

Analysts suggest that Washington still possesses leverage should negotiations falter, including tightening sanctions and increasing military support for Ukraine. However, many of the most impactful economic measures, such as sanctions on major Russian energy and financial entities, are already in effect. The U.S. has also provided Ukraine with tens of billions of dollars in military aid since the onset of the conflict, leaving a narrower range of options if talks stall.

Trump has expressed frustration over the slow pace of diplomacy, suggesting that a resolution “should have happened a long time ago.” Nonetheless, officials have not indicated that Washington is preparing to abandon the negotiations.

Source: Original article

Steve Wilson Discusses Creating Value in Intelligent Enterprises

Steve Wilson emphasizes the importance of responsible AI adoption and measurable outcomes in a recent episode of the CAIO Connect Podcast.

In a recent episode of the “CAIO Connect Podcast,” hosted by Sanjay Puri, cybersecurity innovator Steve Wilson, the chief AI and product officer at Exabeam, shared insights from his extensive career in artificial intelligence. Wilson’s journey began with early AI experiments in the 1990s and has evolved into a prominent role in advocating for secure AI adoption.

Reflecting on his career, Wilson noted, “I started my first AI company with some friends when I graduated from college in the early 1990s.” However, the rapid growth of the internet in 1995 prompted him to shift his focus away from AI for several years. “I set aside AI for a while and didn’t really come back to it till the [2010s],” he explained.

His return to the field was catalyzed by the emergence of generative AI, particularly with the introduction of ChatGPT. While leading product initiatives at Exabeam, Wilson became increasingly interested in the security implications of these new AI models. This interest led him to establish a research initiative at the OWASP Foundation, where he authored the first draft of the “OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Models,” a document aimed at helping organizations navigate the complexities of these technologies.

As Exabeam’s first Chief AI Officer (CAIO), Wilson is at the forefront of AI transformation within the company, overseeing advancements in both cybersecurity products and internal operations, including sales processes and engineering workflows.

During the podcast, Wilson shared his insights on how enterprises can adopt AI responsibly and effectively. When asked about governance in an era of autonomous AI systems, he articulated the challenge clearly. He noted that while AI risks such as prompt injection and hallucination may seem novel, the underlying task of ensuring security is familiar. “Every technological shift required understanding a new layer of security,” he stated.

Wilson emphasized the importance of continuous monitoring of AI behaviors, stating, “We need to understand their normal patterns. When they get out of normal, we need to be able to detect that.” He reiterated that foundational principles still apply: organizations must know their data, understand the tools at their disposal, collaborate with CIOs and CISOs, and establish clear policies without stifling innovation.

Highlighting the challenges faced by many organizations, Wilson referenced an MIT study revealing that “95% of the AI projects that have been rolled out the last few years have not been successful.” He remarked on the fear of being left behind, comparing it to companies that faltered during the internet boom. “You don’t want to become the next Blockbuster video or Sears Roebuck that becomes a memory,” he cautioned.

A particularly striking moment in the conversation arose when Wilson addressed the phenomenon of “AI theater,” where companies invest heavily in AI initiatives without achieving measurable results. He asserted, “What I am suggesting is that just spending money to roll out AI and give tools to your workforce, they will not all figure out by themselves how to get better.”

Wilson proposed a straightforward approach: begin with key performance indicators (KPIs) rather than focusing solely on the technology itself. At Exabeam, this strategy involves identifying bottlenecks, such as sales exception processing areas, where AI can directly enhance revenue and efficiency. He differentiated between “horizontal” tools, which are broadly available to all employees, and “vertical” use cases that address critical business challenges.

“Those are the ones where you can invest, spend the time, and then figure out that you can measure the success and see how that’s going to impact your business,” Wilson explained.

As organizations rush to implement AI solutions, Wilson’s insights underscore a crucial message: the most successful adopters will not necessarily be the fastest, but rather those who approach innovation with intention and a focus on measurable impact.

Source: Original article

Layoffs Amid Growth: Understanding Job Cuts at Tech Giants

Amid a seemingly healthy economy, major U.S. tech companies are implementing significant layoffs driven by overcapacity, the rise of artificial intelligence, and economic uncertainty.

As Americans gathered to celebrate Thanksgiving last week, the U.S. tech industry faced mounting challenges. Major companies, including Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Intel, Google, Salesforce, UPS, Target, and IBM, have announced job cuts totaling tens of thousands.

A report from the career transition firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas revealed a staggering 175% increase in tech job cuts in October compared to the previous year, marking one of the sharpest spikes since the early pandemic years. This trend raises a critical question: What is driving this wave of layoffs when the broader economy appears to be in decent health?

The first factor contributing to these layoffs is a familiar narrative: the correction that follows periods of excess. In the wake of COVID-19, technology companies embarked on an unprecedented hiring spree, anticipating a permanent shift of human activity online. Billions were invested in cloud infrastructure, logistics, and digital platforms, leading to overcapacity across nearly every sector of the digital economy.

As demand returned to normal levels, however, payrolls did not adjust accordingly. Since 2022, tech giants have been working to shed the excess capacity built during the pandemic, trimming teams in marketing, recruiting, and even software engineering. This over-hiring has resulted in lingering consequences, much like the inflation caused by the fiscal surge during the pandemic.

The second significant driver of layoffs is the rapid rise of artificial intelligence, which is fundamentally altering corporate priorities and job structures. As AI tools increasingly automate tasks once performed by humans—ranging from content generation and data analysis to coding—companies are aggressively restructuring their workforces to align with these new technological capabilities.

Jobs that were once deemed essential are now becoming redundant. Companies are not merely laying off employees to cut costs; they are redesigning their operations around automation.

The third factor contributing to the current wave of layoffs is economic uncertainty, exacerbated by unpredictable policymaking from the Trump administration. President Donald Trump, who campaigned on promises of restoring economic stability, has instead introduced tariffs, trade turbulence, and unpredictability into the marketplace.

Tariffs on key imports from China, Mexico, and India have increased costs for U.S. manufacturers and tech companies, further straining already tight profit margins. Additionally, the administration’s new $100,000 H-1B visa fee, aimed at discouraging foreign hiring, has created further uncertainty for both employers and workers.

Many companies, wary of unclear trade rules and regulatory challenges, have quietly instituted unofficial hiring freezes as they await policy clarity. Meanwhile, inflation continues to linger, with the Federal Reserve maintaining high interest rates to combat rising prices, making capital more expensive and discouraging corporate investment and hiring.

While the current wave of layoffs is painful, it does not compare to the devastation of the Great Recession of 2008, which resulted in nearly 9 million job losses, or the COVID-19 job market collapse of 2020, which saw 22 million jobs vanish. Instead, it resembles the dot-com crash of the early 2000s, during which approximately 400,000 tech jobs disappeared as overvalued internet startups failed. Although the current correction has not reached that scale, the structural parallels are noteworthy.

What is particularly striking about this moment is the paradox it presents: a relatively strong economy coupled with weak hiring. Unemployment remains near historic lows, and GDP growth is steady. Yet, job creation has slowed, and layoffs persist. In previous economic cycles, laid-off tech workers could typically find new employment within weeks. Today, however, even highly skilled professionals are facing months of unemployment.

Among the most vulnerable are H-1B visa holders, who have only 60 days to secure a new job after losing their current position, or risk deportation. For many, particularly those with families and children in U.S. schools, the anxiety is overwhelming.

Adding to their distress is a resurgence of anti-immigrant sentiment fueled by political rhetoric. Supporters of the administration have propagated the false narrative that companies are dismissing American workers to hire cheaper labor from India on H-1B visas. This has led to renewed legislative efforts on Capitol Hill and in several states to further restrict visa programs. Combined with the already high fees and compliance burdens, the environment for foreign professionals has become increasingly hostile.

The American job market is at a critical juncture, not due to a formal recession, but because of a structural transformation. The post-pandemic hiring frenzy, the accelerating influence of artificial intelligence, and policy uncertainty under the Trump administration have converged to reshape the nature of work itself.

For now, the labor market remains resilient. However, beneath the surface, significant churn is occurring, and the adjustments are painful. As history has shown, each technological revolution brings both winners and losers. The pressing question for America is not whether it can adapt, but how humanely and intelligently it will manage that adaptation.

Source: Original article

Muslim Father and Sons Charged in Drowning of Teen Over Lifestyle Choices

Prosecutors in the Netherlands are seeking lengthy prison sentences for a Syrian father and his two sons accused of murdering 18-year-old Ryan Al Najjar over her perceived “Western” lifestyle.

Dutch prosecutors announced on Friday that a father and his two sons, members of a “strict” Muslim family, could face up to 25 years in prison for the alleged drowning of 18-year-old Ryan Al Najjar. Authorities claim the family believed her behavior was bringing shame upon them, leading to the tragic incident.

Ryan Al Najjar’s body was discovered submerged in a lake near Joure in northern Netherlands on May 28, 2024, six days after she went missing. Her hands and feet were reportedly bound tightly, prompting an investigation that resulted in the arrest of her father, Khaled, and her two brothers, aged 22 and 24. Prosecutors indicated that the murder likely occurred on May 22.

The Public Prosecution Service stated, “They saw Ryan as a burden that had to be removed, just because she was a young woman who wanted to live her own life.” The family allegedly targeted Al Najjar after she refused to wear a headscarf in public and exhibited behaviors deemed too “Western” by her relatives.

Prosecutors highlighted a specific incident that may have triggered the family’s violent response: a live TikTok video featuring Ryan without a headscarf and wearing makeup. The video reportedly caused significant embarrassment to the family, as it conflicted with their traditional values.

Once the suspects became aware of the video, they began searching for Ryan. According to the Public Prosecution Service, her brothers convinced her to accompany them to a remote location the night before her murder. This led to her being taken to Knardijk, where their father joined them, and where she was ultimately killed.

Local media outlet NL Times identified the brothers as Mohamed Al Najjar and Muhanad. All three family members have been charged with murder, while Khaled is accused of orchestrating the crime and is believed to have fled to Syria shortly after the incident.

Investigators revealed that Ryan was taken to a secluded park where her cries for help would not be heard. Evidence indicated signs of both strangulation and drowning, with approximately 60 feet of tape used to bind her before she was thrown into the water alive. Prosecutors noted that Khaled’s DNA was found under Ryan’s fingernails, suggesting he was present during the attack.

The Public Prosecution Service described Khaled’s actions as “cowardly,” stating, “[Khaled] fled to Syria immediately after the murder and left his sons to take the blame. Khaled has completely destroyed his family.”

Dutch authorities have expressed concerns about the potential difficulties in extraditing Khaled, as he has reportedly married a woman in Syria since Ryan’s death. The prosecution has recommended a 25-year prison sentence for Khaled and 20 years for each of his sons. A court ruling is expected on January 5, 2025.

Fox News Digital reached out to the Public Prosecution Service for further details regarding the case.

Source: Original article

Trump Proposes Revoking Citizenship from Naturalized Criminals if Authorized

President Trump announced a potential long-term halt on asylum processing and discussed revoking citizenship from naturalized immigrants with criminal records during a recent press conference aboard Air Force One.

President Donald Trump stated on Sunday that his administration’s freeze on asylum processing could extend for an indefinite period. This announcement follows a tragic incident involving the shooting of two National Guard members in Washington, D.C. Trump also suggested he might pursue the authority to revoke citizenship from certain naturalized immigrants who have criminal histories.

While the administration has characterized the asylum freeze as an emergency response to the recent shooting, Trump’s remarks indicate that these restrictions could become a more permanent fixture of his immigration policy. He linked the pause in asylum processing to a tougher stance against 19 nations he described as “crime-ridden.”

During his comments, Trump asserted that he would “absolutely” seek to de-naturalize immigrants convicted of crimes, contingent upon whether he possesses the presidential authority to do so. “We have enough problems. We don’t want those people,” he stated, emphasizing that there is no set time limit for the moratorium on asylum processing.

“We have criminals that came into our country and they were naturalized,” Trump continued. “If I have the power to do it – I’m not sure that I do, but if I do – I would de-naturalize. Absolutely.”

Trump also clarified his recent mention of “reverse migration,” explaining that it refers to the removal of individuals already residing in the United States. “Get people out that are in our country – get them out of here,” he said.

The comments come in the wake of a shooting incident involving Rahmanullah Lakanwal, a 29-year-old Afghan national, who has been charged with the shooting of two West Virginia National Guard members near the White House. U.S. Army Spc. Sarah Beckstrom, 20, was killed in the attack, while her colleague, U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe, 24, remains in critical condition. Both service members were deployed to D.C. as part of Trump’s initiative to combat crime, which included federalizing local police forces.

In light of the incident, Trump stated that he has invited the families of both Guard members to the White House. “I said, ‘When you’re ready, because that’s a tough thing, come to the White House. We’re going to honor Sarah,” he told reporters. “And likewise with Andrew, recover or not.”

Lakanwal faces serious charges, including first-degree murder and two counts of assault with intent to kill while armed. These charges have prompted the Trump administration to halt all asylum decisions and pause the issuance of visas for individuals traveling on Afghan passports.

As the situation develops, the implications of Trump’s comments on immigration policy and the administration’s approach to asylum seekers remain to be seen.

Source: Original article

Sharanjit Thind Announces Candidacy for Congress in New York’s 18th District

Sharanjit Singh Thind, a lifelong Republican, is campaigning for the U.S. House of Representatives in New York’s 18th District, aiming to flip the seat currently held by Democrats.

NEW YORK, NY – Sharanjit Singh Thind is officially running for the U.S. House of Representatives, representing New York’s 18th District in the Hudson Valley. A lifelong Republican originally from Punjab, Thind is optimistic about his chances to flip this Democrat-held seat.

Thind’s campaign is centered around several key issues, including promoting business growth, making jobs resilient to automation, defending family values, and prioritizing community safety. He believes these priorities resonate with the constituents of the district.

Before filing his nomination papers in September, Thind sought the backing of the Republican establishment. He met with Ed Cox, the New York Republican State Committee Chairman and son-in-law of former President Nixon, to discuss support for his candidacy. During this meeting, Thind was informed that no other Republican candidates were in the race, reinforcing his belief that the 18th Congressional District is a strong opportunity for him.

Despite acknowledging that the current incumbent, Patrick Ryan, defeated his GOP opponent by a notable 14 points in the 2024 election, Thind argues that the political landscape has shifted. He cites growing frustration among voters regarding the presence of illegal migrants in local hotels and motels, a situation he attributes to the policies of President Biden and Mayor Adams. Thind contrasts this with the law and order he claims was restored under President Trump.

Thind’s journey to the United States began at the turn of the century, and he has since built a career with several reputable companies. He also serves as the editor and publisher of ‘The South Asian Insider,’ a platform that highlights issues pertinent to the South Asian community.

In addition to his professional endeavors, Thind has a history of public service. He served as a Commissioner on the Nassau County Human Rights Commission until 2018 and has experience working with the Receiver of Taxes office in the Town of Hempstead, the largest township in America.

To launch his campaign effectively, Thind plans to invest his own funds while also seeking support from small donors. He resides on Long Island with his wife and two sons, emphasizing his commitment to the community he aims to represent.

As Thind embarks on this political journey, he is determined to connect with voters and address the pressing issues they face, hoping to secure a seat in Congress.

Source: Original article

Surge in Whooping Cough Cases Reported in California and Other States

Rates of whooping cough are surging in several U.S. states, driven by declining vaccination rates and waning immunity, posing significant risks to infants and young children.

Rates of pertussis, commonly known as whooping cough, are experiencing a notable surge across the United States, particularly in states such as Texas, Florida, California, and Oregon. This alarming trend is attributed to a combination of falling vaccination rates, diminishing immunity, and delays in public health tracking systems, as reported by state and federal health officials. Infants who are too young to be fully vaccinated are at the highest risk of severe complications from the disease.

Demetre Daskalakis, a former head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) immunization program, emphasized the cyclical nature of pertussis outbreaks. “Pertussis cases increase in a cyclical fashion driven by waning immunity, but the size of the outbreak and the potential for severe outcomes in children who cannot be vaccinated can be mitigated by high coverage and good communication to folks at risk,” he stated.

Historically, before the introduction of the first pertussis vaccine in the early 1900s, whooping cough was one of the most prevalent childhood diseases and a leading cause of childhood mortality in the United States. Currently, children receive a series of DTaP shots, starting at two months of age, while teens and adults receive a Tdap booster every ten years. Both vaccines also protect against diphtheria and tetanus.

Vaccination rates had been relatively stable, with approximately 80% of toddlers receiving the recommended four doses of the DTaP vaccine by age two. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a decline in vaccine coverage, exacerbated by an increase in nonmedical exemptions in various states. This has resulted in immunity gaps, where the proportion of immune individuals falls below the threshold necessary to contain the spread of the disease.

In Texas, the number of reported pertussis cases has surged dramatically, with 1,928 cases logged in 2024 and exceeding 3,500 by October 2025. Nationally, the statistics are equally concerning; in the first three months of 2025, the U.S. recorded 6,600 cases—four times the rate of the previous year and 25 times that of 2023. Several states are witnessing their highest case totals in a decade, indicating that this surge is not confined to specific regions.

One contributing factor to this increase is a recent Texas law that simplifies the process for parents to claim nonmedical exemptions from school vaccine requirements. Parents can now download exemption forms online, which are sent directly to schools rather than health departments, complicating tracking efforts. Phil Huang, Director of Dallas County Health and Human Services, noted a significant drop in vaccination rates during the back-to-school season, a trend he attributes to this new exemption rule.

Huang also highlighted that fear of immigration enforcement may deter some families, particularly those in the Hispanic community, from seeking vaccinations. With Dallas County being approximately 40% Hispanic, he expressed concern that many families might be avoiding healthcare services due to fears related to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activities.

While vaccines are effective in preventing severe disease, their protective effects against infection diminish over time. The U.S. transitioned from whole-cell pertussis vaccines to acellular vaccines in the 1990s, which, while causing fewer side effects, do not provide long-lasting immunity. As a result, many adults who received the acellular vaccine as children may have lost their immunity and could unknowingly transmit the infection to infants.

Infants under one year old are particularly vulnerable to whooping cough, with some experiencing severe coughing fits that can lead to breathing cessation. Hospitalization is often required, and approximately one in five affected infants develops pneumonia, with a mortality rate of about 1%.

To mitigate these risks, the CDC recommends that pregnant women receive a Tdap vaccine during each pregnancy, allowing antibodies to be passed to the baby before birth. Although the strategy of “cocooning,” which involved vaccinating all family members and caregivers around the infant, was once promoted, it has become less practical and is no longer widely recommended. Vaccination of pregnant women and timely immunization of infants at two months remain the most effective protective measures.

Advancements in modern PCR testing have also contributed to the increased detection of pertussis cases. Many clinics now utilize lab-based technology to test for multiple respiratory infections simultaneously, including pertussis. While this improved testing explains part of the rise in reported cases, the significant number of infant hospitalizations and widespread outbreaks indicate a genuine increase in transmission rates.

Another growing concern is the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains of pertussis. While macrolide antibiotics, such as erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin, are typically effective in treating the illness, resistance has been reported in other countries, particularly in China and Peru. Although resistant cases remain rare in the U.S., CDC officials warn that international travel could facilitate the spread of these strains.

As the resurgence of whooping cough continues, health experts emphasize the need for a multifaceted approach to address the complexities of the situation. Clinicians are being advised to maintain a high index of suspicion for pertussis, particularly in patients, especially children, presenting with persistent coughs or coughing fits followed by vomiting. Immediate care is critical for infants who exhibit breathing difficulties.

Obstetricians are encouraged to discuss the importance of the Tdap vaccine during every pregnancy, while pediatricians and family doctors are urged to verify booster status for teens and adults. In response to the rising cases, several states, including Texas, have issued health advisories urging clinicians to remain vigilant.

As the holiday season approaches, experts recommend that families with newborns take extra precautions. They should ensure that infants and children are up to date with their vaccinations and that all family members are vaccinated against influenza, COVID-19, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Additionally, keeping sick visitors away and seeking prompt medical attention for infants showing signs of respiratory distress are crucial steps in protecting the youngest and most vulnerable members of the community.

Source: Original article

DOMA Assembles at Ambedkar Bhavan to Affirm Commitment to Constitution

DOMA organized a significant assembly at Ambedkar Bhavan, gathering thousands to pledge their commitment to protecting the Constitution and the rights of marginalized communities in India.

New Delhi, 30th November 2025— DOMA (Parisangh of Dalit, OBC, Minorities and Adivasi Organisations) held a powerful national assembly titled “DOMA Pledge: At Ambedkar’s Feet to Save the Constitution” at Ambedkar Bhavan in New Delhi. The event attracted thousands of participants from across India, all reaffirming their commitment to safeguarding the constitutional rights of marginalized communities.

The assembly was led by Dr. Udit Raj, the National President of DOMA and a former Member of Parliament. He addressed the gathering, highlighting the increasing attacks on constitutional values that threaten the dignity and security of Dalits, OBCs, Minorities, and Adivasis. Dr. Raj emphasized that the Constitution is the soul of India and called for unity among citizens to protect it.

The core objectives of the gathering included defending and protecting the constitutional rights guaranteed to Dalits, Minorities, OBCs, and Adivasis, as well as highlighting the growing incidents of atrocities and discrimination against these groups. The assembly also aimed to reinforce the call for unity, justice, and equality as envisioned by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.

Participants collectively took the DOMA Pledge, vowing to remain steadfast in defending democracy, social justice, and the secular fabric of the nation. Originally, the rally was scheduled to take place at Ramlila Maidan; however, the Delhi Police denied permission following an objection raised by a BJP worker. Despite this last-minute change, DOMA successfully mobilized thousands at Ambedkar Bhavan, showcasing the unwavering commitment of the people to the cause.

A collective call for justice resonated throughout the event, with speakers expressing serious concern over the rising violence and discrimination faced by vulnerable communities. They stressed that constitutional safeguards are under threat, and it is the responsibility of every citizen to stand up for justice and equality.

The assembly concluded with chants of unity and a renewed resolve to continue the struggle for social justice, as envisioned by Babasaheb Ambedkar.

Source: Original article

Check If Your Passwords Were Compromised in Major Data Leak

Threat intelligence firm Synthient has revealed one of the largest password exposures in history, urging users to check their credentials and enhance their online security.

If you haven’t checked your online credentials recently, now is the time to do so. A staggering 1.3 billion unique passwords and 2 billion unique email addresses have surfaced online, marking this event as one of the largest exposures of stolen logins ever recorded.

This massive leak is not the result of a single major breach. Instead, Synthient, a threat intelligence firm, conducted a thorough search of both the open and dark web for leaked credentials. The company previously gained attention for uncovering 183 million exposed email accounts, but this latest discovery is on a much larger scale.

Much of the data stems from credential stuffing lists, which criminals compile from previous breaches to launch new attacks. Synthient’s founder, Benjamin Brundage, collected stolen logins from hundreds of hidden sources across the web. This dataset includes not only old passwords from past breaches but also new passwords compromised by info-stealing malware on infected devices.

Synthient collaborated with security researcher Troy Hunt, who operates the popular website Have I Been Pwned. Hunt verified the dataset and confirmed that it contains new exposures. To test the data, he used one of his old email addresses, which he knew had previously appeared in credential stuffing lists. When he found it in the new trove, he reached out to trusted users of Have I Been Pwned to confirm the findings. Some of these users had never been involved in breaches before, indicating that this leak includes fresh stolen logins.

To see if your email has been affected, it is crucial to take immediate action. First, do not leave any known leaked passwords unchanged. Change them right away on every site where you have used them. Create new logins that are strong, unique, and not similar to your old passwords. This step is essential to cut off criminals who may already possess your stolen credentials.

Another important recommendation is to avoid reusing passwords across different sites. Once hackers obtain a working email and password pair, they often attempt to use it on other services. This method, known as credential stuffing, continues to be effective because many individuals recycle the same login information. One stolen password should not grant access to all your accounts.

Utilizing a strong password manager can help generate new, secure logins for your accounts. These tools create long, complex passwords that you do not need to memorize, while also storing them safely for quick access. Many password managers include features that scan for breaches to check if your current passwords have been compromised.

It is also advisable to check if your email has been exposed in past breaches. Some password managers come equipped with built-in breach scanners that can determine whether your email address or passwords have appeared in known leaks. If you discover a match, promptly change any reused passwords and secure those accounts with new, unique credentials.

Even the strongest password can be compromised. Implementing two-factor authentication (2FA) adds an additional layer of security when logging in. This may involve entering a code from an authenticator app or tapping a physical security key. This extra step can effectively block attackers attempting to access your account with stolen passwords.

Hackers often steal passwords by infecting devices with info-stealing malware, which can hide in phishing emails and deceptive downloads. Once installed, this malware can extract passwords directly from your browser and applications. Protecting your devices with robust antivirus software is essential, as it can detect and block info-stealing malware before it can compromise your accounts. Additionally, antivirus programs can alert you to phishing emails and ransomware scams, safeguarding your personal information and digital assets.

For enhanced protection, consider using passkeys on services that support them. Passkeys utilize cryptographic keys instead of traditional text passwords, making them difficult for criminals to guess or reuse. They also help prevent many phishing attacks, as they only function on trusted sites. Think of passkeys as a secure digital lock for your most important accounts.

Data brokers often collect and sell personal information, which criminals can combine with stolen passwords. Engaging a trusted data removal service can assist in locating and removing your information from people-search sites. Reducing your exposed data makes it more challenging for attackers to target you with convincing scams and account takeovers. While no service can guarantee complete removal, they can significantly decrease your digital footprint, making it harder for scammers to cross-reference leaked credentials with public data to impersonate or target you. These services typically monitor and automatically remove your personal information over time, providing peace of mind in today’s threat landscape.

Security is not a one-time task. It is essential to regularly check your passwords and update older logins before they become a problem. Review which accounts have two-factor authentication enabled and add it wherever possible. By remaining proactive, you can stay one step ahead of hackers and limit the damage from future leaks.

This massive leak serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of digital security. Even when following best practices, your information can still fall into the hands of criminals due to old breaches, malware, or third-party exposures. Adopting a proactive approach places you in a stronger position. Regular checks, secure passwords, and robust authentication measures provide genuine protection.

With billions of stolen passwords circulating online, are you ready to check your own and tighten your account security today?

Source: Original article

New Bill Aims to Double H-1B Visa Cap in Immigration Debate

A bill to double the annual H-1B visa cap has been reintroduced in Congress, reigniting discussions on high-skilled immigration amid ongoing political tensions and enforcement changes.

A new bill aiming to double the annual quota of H-1B work visas has been reintroduced in the U.S. Congress, sparking renewed debate over high-skilled immigration during a period marked by increased enforcement and political strife.

Illinois Democratic Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi has reintroduced the High-Skilled Immigration Reform for Employment (HIRE) Act. This legislation seeks to enhance America’s long-term economic and technological capabilities by expanding access to global talent. Specifically, the proposal would raise the yearly cap on new H-1B visas from 65,000 to 130,000.

This renewed initiative comes in the wake of stricter oversight of the H-1B program implemented during the Trump administration, which introduced more rigorous compliance rules and imposed a significant $100,000 application fee for new visas. This fee is currently facing legal challenges from various business groups.

The implications of the HIRE Act could significantly alter hiring practices across vital sectors such as technology, healthcare, engineering, and scientific research. Proponents argue that U.S. companies are grappling with persistent labor shortages in specialized fields and may fall behind global competitors if access to skilled foreign professionals remains restricted.

The bill’s reintroduction coincides with President Trump’s announcement of a new immigration crackdown following a tragic shooting incident involving two National Guard members near the White House. Trump pledged to “permanently pause” migration from certain developing nations, a statement that could directly impact future H-1B applicants, although formal policy details are still unclear.

The HIRE Act includes several key provisions aimed at addressing workforce needs:

The annual H-1B cap would be doubled from 65,000 to 130,000, along with increased federal funding for STEM education in U.S. elementary and secondary schools. The bill also aims to expand the domestic talent pipeline while supporting industries facing critical workforce gaps.

Advocates believe that combining foreign talent recruitment with domestic STEM investment will create a balanced long-term solution to workforce challenges.

Recent trends in H-1B visa approvals indicate a shift away from large outsourcing firms toward U.S.-based technology companies. Currently, most H-1B visas are granted to companies hiring fewer than 15 workers annually, reflecting heightened scrutiny and changes in hiring practices.

In addition, federal agencies have ramped up audits under a new enforcement initiative known as Project Firewall, which adds further compliance pressure on employers.

Supporters of the bill assert that America’s innovation economy relies heavily on access to global talent. Raja Krishnamoorthi, the bill’s sponsor, emphasized that the legislation is crucial for “building the workforce of tomorrow while keeping the U.S. at the forefront of innovation.”

Leaders from ITServe Alliance described the HIRE Act as a vital reform necessary to modernize the high-skilled immigration system, enhancing transparency and fairness. Economic policy experts point out that H-1B visas serve as the primary long-term pathway for hiring high-skilled foreign graduates, who constitute a significant portion of U.S. science and engineering programs.

However, critics from conservative policy groups argue that the current system enables abuse, suppresses American wages, and disadvantages U.S. graduates. The White House has reiterated that while temporary foreign workers may be necessary for launching large projects, companies are ultimately expected to prioritize hiring and training American workers.

As the bill moves forward, it will undergo the standard legislative process, which includes committee review, potential amendments, and debates in both the House and Senate. Given that immigration is already one of the most contentious issues in Washington, the future of the HIRE Act remains uncertain.

With mounting political pressure from business associations, labor groups, and advocacy organizations, the ongoing struggle between expanding high-skilled immigration and restricting foreign labor is expected to dominate discussions in the upcoming congressional session.

Source: Original article

US Embassy Commends CBI for Closing Illegal Call Center Targeting Americans

The US Embassy in India expressed gratitude to the Central Bureau of Investigation for dismantling an illegal call center that targeted American citizens and for arresting a key operative involved in the scheme.

NEW DELHI – On November 27, the US Embassy in India extended its thanks to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for dismantling an illegal call center that specifically targeted US nationals. The operation also led to the arrest of a significant figure within the transnational cybercrime network.

The Embassy highlighted the collaborative efforts between Indian and US agencies aimed at dismantling international networks that facilitate scams, thereby enhancing the safety of citizens.

Earlier this week, the CBI announced the arrest of Vikas Kumar Nimar, a key suspect who had been evading capture and was allegedly involved in managing a vast network of illegal call centers aimed at defrauding foreign nationals, particularly Americans.

Nimar was apprehended at his home in Lucknow on November 20, following a warrant issued by the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Pune.

The CBI initiated its investigation into this case in 2024, subsequently launching extensive search operations across various states in India.

In September 2024, during a series of coordinated raids, the agency successfully dismantled four illegal call centers operating out of Pune, Hyderabad, and Visakhapatnam.

Investigators revealed that these centers were part of a sophisticated cybercrime syndicate designed to defraud US citizens through deceptive calls and online schemes.

Upon Nimar’s detention at his Lucknow residence, CBI officials recovered Rs 14 lakh in cash, multiple mobile phones, and several incriminating documents believed to be connected to the cybercrime operations.

These efforts underscore the commitment of both Indian and US authorities to combat cybercrime and protect citizens from fraudulent activities.

Source: Original article

Schumer Claims Trump Is Leading U.S. Toward Conflict with Venezuela

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer warns that President Trump’s actions regarding Venezuela risk pushing the U.S. toward military conflict without congressional approval.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Democrat from New York, issued a stark warning on Saturday regarding President Donald Trump’s approach to Venezuela. Schumer accused the president of bringing the United States “closer and closer to another costly foreign war” without the necessary congressional approval.

In a forceful statement, Schumer criticized Trump’s recent escalations concerning Venezuela, asserting that the president has undermined the Constitution. “President Trump’s reckless actions towards Venezuela are pushing America closer and closer to another costly foreign war,” Schumer stated. He emphasized that under the U.S. Constitution, Congress holds the exclusive power to declare war, a power that has not been authorized for military action against Venezuela.

The minority leader urged Trump to refrain from entering another overseas conflict, noting that “Americans are tired of endless foreign wars that cost the lives of countless American service members and drain precious resources.” He further remarked, “This is not an America First policy.”

Schumer called for a bipartisan effort among his colleagues in Congress to “come together to return the power to declare war back to the people.” His comments came in response to a post by Trump on Truth Social, where the president declared that Venezuela’s airspace should be considered “closed in its entirety.”

In his post, Trump addressed various stakeholders, including airlines and drug traffickers, urging them to recognize the closure of Venezuelan airspace. This statement followed a warning from the Federal Aviation Administration about a “worsening security situation” in the region.

During a Thanksgiving address to U.S. service members, Trump indicated that the U.S. would “very soon” begin efforts to stop suspected Venezuelan drug traffickers “by land.” He remarked, “In recent weeks, you’ve been working to deter Venezuelan drug traffickers, of which there are many,” adding that there are fewer traffickers coming in by sea.

Trump highlighted the severe impact of drug trafficking on American lives, stating that traffickers kill “hundreds of thousands of people a year” in the U.S. through the “poisons” they bring into the country. He has not ruled out the possibility of deploying American troops to Venezuela, stating on November 17 that he has not eliminated that option.

When asked if he would rule out troop deployments, Trump responded, “No, I don’t rule out that, I don’t rule out anything.”

On Friday, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth defended the Trump administration’s military strikes on alleged drug vessels in the Caribbean Sea. Hegseth stated, “As we’ve said from the beginning, and in every statement, these highly effective strikes are specifically intended to be ‘lethal, kinetic strikes.” He emphasized that the goal is to stop lethal drugs, destroy narco-boats, and eliminate the narco-terrorists responsible for poisoning the American populace.

Hegseth’s comments followed reports from various news outlets, including The Washington Post and CNN, regarding a second military strike on a suspected drug vessel in the Caribbean. This strike occurred after an initial attack left two survivors.

In response to the reports, Hegseth criticized the media, stating, “As usual, the fake news is delivering more fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory reporting to discredit our incredible warriors fighting to protect the homeland.”

House Armed Services Committee Chair Mike Rogers, a Republican from Alabama, and Ranking Member Adam Smith, a Democrat from Washington, issued a joint statement on Saturday. They reaffirmed the committee’s commitment to providing rigorous oversight of the Department of Defense’s military operations in the Caribbean. They expressed concern over reports of follow-on strikes on boats alleged to be transporting narcotics in the SOUTHCOM region and announced bipartisan efforts to gather a complete account of the operations in question.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House for comment regarding these developments.

Source: Original article

Antifa Protests Turn Violent in Germany Amid U.S. Terror Designation

Violence erupted in Giessen, Germany, as Antifa protesters clashed with police during a demonstration against the Alternative for Germany’s youth convention, raising concerns over rising extremism.

Violence erupted in Giessen, Germany, as Antifa and other protesters clashed with police during a demonstration against the youth convention of the right-wing populist party Alternative for Germany (AfD). The protests, which drew between 25,000 and 30,000 participants, delayed the start of the conference for the AfD’s youth wing, Generation Deutschland.

In response to the large turnout, authorities deployed the largest police contingent in the history of the state of Hesse, with approximately 6,000 officers on the ground. The situation escalated when demonstrators began throwing stones at police, resulting in injuries among law enforcement personnel.

AfD co-leader Alice Weidel condemned the demonstrators during her speech at the convention center, stating, “What is being done out there — dear left-wingers, dear extremists, you need to look at yourselves — is something that is deeply undemocratic.”

The protests were marked by confrontations, with police using pepper spray and water cannons to disperse crowds that ignored orders to leave. Reports indicate that 10 to 15 officers sustained minor injuries during the clashes.

Richard Grenell, the former U.S. ambassador to Germany, expressed concern over the rise of anti-democratic sentiments among the left in Germany. He warned via social media platform X that the violent left could follow a path similar to that of their counterparts in the United States, potentially leading to increased violence and a loss of public support.

Boris Rhein, the governor of Hesse from the Christian Democratic Union, criticized the violent actions against police and the attempts to disrupt the AfD youth event. He stated, “The use of violence and attempts to prevent assemblies through marches can never be democratic means.”

The AfD has gained significant traction in recent elections, securing 20.8% of the vote in February, which placed them in second place. However, mainstream German political parties have refrained from forming coalitions with the AfD due to concerns over the party’s extremist views.

At the convention, the youth division of the AfD elected 28-year-old Jean-Pascal Hohm as its chairman. According to a report from the German newspaper Die Welt, Hohm has been quoted expressing anti-immigrant and nationalist sentiments. He emphasized the party’s commitment to a migration policy that prioritizes the interests of Germans, stating, “We will fight resolutely for a genuine shift in migration policy that ensures Germany remains the homeland of Germans.”

The formation of Generation Deutschland comes after Germany’s federal intelligence agency classified the previous AfD youth chapter, Young Alternative, as an “extremist organization” in 2023, leading to its dissolution. The AfD positions itself as an anti-establishment force amid growing public disillusionment with traditional politicians.

Since entering the national parliament in 2017, the AfD has capitalized on public discontent, particularly regarding migration, which remains a central theme in their platform. The party’s leaders displayed confidence during the convention, reflecting their strategy of leveraging various societal grievances to bolster their support.

The events in Giessen underscore the ongoing tensions between far-right and far-left groups in Germany, raising questions about the implications for democracy and public safety in the country.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Thanksgiving Message: A Blend of Humor and Controversy

Donald Trump pardoned two Thanksgiving turkeys while launching a tirade against his political adversaries, reflecting his ongoing grievances and legal battles.

In a traditional White House ceremony, Donald Trump, often referred to as “the merciful,” granted “unconditional” pardons to two Thanksgiving turkeys named Gobble and Waddle. However, the event quickly turned into a platform for Trump to roast his political opponents, particularly those of the Democratic Party.

Upon first seeing the turkeys, Trump humorously suggested they should be named after Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi. He remarked, “I would never pardon those people,” dismissing a plea from First Lady Melania Trump to maintain a more gracious tone.

Trump took the opportunity to criticize last year’s turkey pardons issued by President Joe Biden, claiming they were invalid because Biden used an autopen. He provocatively asked, “Where’s Hunter?” referring to Biden’s son, implying potential legal troubles for him once again.

In a characteristic display of his combative rhetoric, Trump joked about sending the pardoned turkeys to a notorious prison in El Salvador, known for housing migrants deported from the United States. He also announced plans to cancel “all Executive Orders, and anything else that was not directly signed by Crooked Joe Biden,” declaring that any document signed by Biden with an autopen would be nullified.

Trump alleged that “the Radical Left Lunatics” surrounding Biden had effectively taken the presidency from him by using the autopen, a device that has been utilized by various U.S. presidents, including Trump himself. He warned that if Biden claimed involvement in the autopen process, he could face charges of perjury, although the feasibility of nullifying Biden’s pardons and executive orders remains unclear.

During the ceremony, Trump refrained from mentioning two other figures he would never pardon: former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. A federal judge recently dismissed cases against them, citing the illegal appointment of the prosecuting attorney. Despite this setback, the Justice Department plans to appeal, as Comey and James have argued that the prosecutions are politically motivated, pointing to Trump’s public calls for retribution against his perceived enemies.

Despite ongoing legal challenges, Trump celebrated a significant victory when a judge in Georgia dismissed the last pending criminal prosecution against him. This effectively ended efforts to hold him accountable for attempts to overturn the 2020 election results. The Georgia case was considered one of the most serious threats to Trump, as state criminal convictions are not subject to presidential pardons.

Following the dismissal, Trump labeled the prosecution as an “Illegal, Unconstitutional, and unAmerican Hoax,” claiming it was orchestrated by Biden and his “Handlers” in a relentless pursuit to “GET TRUMP.” He accused “The Deranged Democrats” of weaponizing law enforcement against “HONEST AND LOVING Americans.”

Trump also took aim at the media, specifically targeting “The Creeps at the Failing New York Times,” which he claimed had published a piece suggesting he was losing stamina. He dismissed the article as a “hit piece” and referred to the publication as a “cheap RAG” and an “ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE.”

In a recent press interaction, Trump lashed out at a female reporter who questioned him about an Afghan man suspected of shooting two National Guard troops near the White House. The reporter noted that the shooter had been granted asylum by the Trump administration after thorough vetting. Trump responded sharply, asking, “Are you stupid?” and attributing blame to the Biden administration for allowing the shooter into the country.

The White House’s official RapidResponse account later shared the exchange on social media, branding it as “FAKE NEWS.” This incident followed another confrontation earlier in the month, where Trump dismissed a Bloomberg reporter’s inquiry about the Epstein files with a derisive comment.

In light of the shooting incident in Washington, Trump ordered a reexamination of all green cards issued to individuals from 19 countries deemed “of concern.” He declared a permanent pause on migration from “all Third World Countries” to allow the U.S. system to recover, asserting that “Only REVERSE MIGRATION can fully cure this situation.”

Trump also shared several posts from his followers on Truth Social, depicting him as a warrior against the “Deep State,” including one image portraying him as a king in armor with a warning that “NONE shall escape his justice!”

As the Thanksgiving holiday approached, Trump’s remarks and actions underscored his continued focus on political grievances and his ongoing legal battles, demonstrating that even in moments of tradition, his combative spirit remains at the forefront.

Source: Original article

OpenAI’s Data Center Partners Face $100 Billion Debt Crisis

OpenAI’s data center partners are on track to accumulate nearly $100 billion in debt, raising concerns about financial sustainability amid the company’s aggressive expansion in artificial intelligence.

OpenAI’s rapid expansion in the artificial intelligence sector has raised significant financial concerns, particularly regarding the mounting debt faced by its data center partners. These partners are projected to incur nearly $100 billion (€86.4 billion) in borrowing linked to the loss-making startup, while OpenAI itself benefits from a debt-driven spending spree without directly assuming the associated financial risks.

In a statement, OpenAI emphasized the importance of building AI infrastructure to meet the surging global demand for its services. “The current compute shortage is the single biggest constraint on OpenAI’s ability to grow,” the company noted.

OpenAI executives have indicated plans to raise substantial debt to finance contracts related to its infrastructure needs. However, the financial burden has largely fallen on the shoulders of its partners and their lenders. “That’s been kind of the strategy,” a senior OpenAI executive explained. “How does [OpenAI] leverage other people’s balance sheets?”

In 2025, OpenAI secured one of the largest funding rounds in technology history, attracting significant global investors and solidifying its status as a leading AI company. This funding round, reportedly valued at around $40 billion, elevated OpenAI’s valuation to approximately $300 billion. Notable investors included SoftBank, which led the round, Thrive Capital, and long-term partner Microsoft. The influx of capital has allowed OpenAI to scale its compute infrastructure, advance AI research, and develop more powerful AI models, all while maintaining a competitive edge in the rapidly evolving AI landscape.

Additionally, a secondary share sale by employees later in 2025 resulted in an implied valuation of roughly $500 billion, reflecting strong investor confidence in OpenAI’s potential. These investments underscore the global belief in OpenAI’s technology and its capacity to transform industries, driving innovation and shaping the future of artificial intelligence worldwide.

Based in San Francisco, OpenAI recently achieved the status of the world’s most valuable private company, valued at $500 billion. The company asserts that it requires even more capital to fund data centers, chips, and power in its pursuit of creating “artificial general intelligence”—systems that surpass human capabilities.

This strategy of leveraging external balance sheets allows OpenAI to scale quickly without directly assuming a proportionate financial risk. However, it raises critical questions about the long-term sustainability of its infrastructure partners and lenders, who appear to be bearing much of the financial exposure.

As demand for AI continues to surge, ensuring the stability of both OpenAI and its ecosystem of partners is vital. The company’s ability to balance aggressive expansion with responsible financial management will likely determine whether its ambitious vision for advanced AI is sustainable or fraught with unforeseen economic consequences.

The $100 billion in bonds, bank loans, and private credit deals associated with OpenAI is comparable to the net debt directly held by the six largest corporate borrowers globally, which includes major companies such as Volkswagen, Toyota, AT&T, and Comcast, according to a 2024 report by asset manager Janus Henderson.

If OpenAI’s partners struggle to manage such substantial debt obligations, the repercussions could extend across the broader technology and financial sectors, impacting lenders and other companies involved in AI infrastructure projects.

Monitoring the financial health of OpenAI’s data center partners and their capacity to service debt will be crucial. Any disruption in compute capacity or financial stability could directly affect OpenAI’s operations and the wider AI ecosystem.

Source: Original article

Tucker Carlson Network CEO Neil Patel and Mark Levin Clash Online

Neil Patel, CEO of the Tucker Carlson Network, and conservative commentator Mark Levin engaged in a heated online exchange ahead of the upcoming Doha Forum.

The Doha Forum, scheduled for December 6-7, has ignited a fierce online clash between Neil Patel, CEO of the Tucker Carlson Network (TCN), and conservative radio host Mark Levin. The confrontation began when an X user questioned Patel’s participation in the Forum, prompting a series of escalating exchanges between the two figures.

Levin initiated the dispute with a post on X, stating, “Qatarlson, Inc. Should they register as foreign agents under FARA? Just asking questions.” Patel quickly retaliated, responding, “Must suck to watch helplessly in your later years as your life’s work falls apart completely.”

The exchanges intensified, with Levin further criticizing Patel in another post: “Neil Patel, a pimple on a camel’s a*s. You must be proud of the Jew-hatred and anti-American filth your network spews. Grifters like you eventually fade away. Enjoy Qatar next week, a heinous terror and slave dictatorship, sleaze ball.”

Patel’s response was sharp: “Wow, is this unhinged. Hoping you find the help you clearly need, Mark.” The back-and-forth highlights the growing tensions within conservative media circles, particularly as both figures represent differing ideologies and approaches to commentary.

Mark Levin, born in 1957, is a prominent American lawyer, author, and conservative political commentator. He is best known for hosting the nationally syndicated radio program “The Mark Levin Show,” which reaches millions of listeners across hundreds of stations. Levin combines his legal expertise with political analysis, offering insights on U.S. politics, constitutional law, national security, and cultural issues.

In addition to his radio program, Levin hosts the television show “Life, Liberty & Levin,” where he interviews politicians, authors, and thought leaders. A best-selling author, Levin has penned several books advocating for conservative principles, constitutional interpretation, and limited government.

In 2025, Levin publicly criticized Tucker Carlson for his interviews with controversial figures, including white nationalist Nick Fuentes. Levin condemned Carlson for providing a platform to extremists, labeling his actions as “poison” for the conservative movement and comparing him to “modern-day David Duke.”

Carlson responded to Levin’s criticism by denying any endorsement of Nazi ideology and emphasizing that hosting controversial guests does not equate to promoting their views. He challenged Levin to a face-to-face debate, accusing him of cowardice.

Neil Patel co-founded the Tucker Carlson Network in December 2023, launching a subscription-based video service that offers a mix of premium and ad-supported content, including long-form interviews, political commentary, and cultural analysis. As CEO, Patel oversees the network’s business operations, strategic direction, and growth initiatives, while Carlson serves as the on-air host and content driver.

In June 2025, Patel and Carlson reportedly bought out all external investors, granting themselves full ownership and operational control of the network. Patel’s leadership role at TCN underscores the rising influence of independent media ventures, while the ongoing disagreements between Carlson and Levin reflect contrasting philosophies within conservative commentary. One emphasizes open debate and controversial interviews, while the other prioritizes moral boundaries and ideological consistency.

The online clash between Patel and Levin serves as a microcosm of the broader debates occurring within conservative media today, highlighting the challenges and divisions that exist as the landscape continues to evolve.

Source: Original article

USCIS Suspends Asylum Decisions Following Shooting of National Guard Members

USCIS has suspended all asylum decisions following a shooting incident involving an Afghan national that resulted in the death of a National Guard member in Washington, D.C.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced a halt to all asylum decisions after an Afghan national was accused of shooting two National Guard members in Washington, D.C., resulting in the death of one service member.

On Friday, USCIS Director Joseph B. Edlow stated that the suspension of asylum decisions would remain in effect “until we can ensure that every alien is vetted and screened to the maximum degree possible.” He emphasized the priority of American safety in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter.

This pause in asylum decisions aligns with a broader immigration crackdown initiated by President Donald Trump. On Thursday, Trump pledged to halt migration from “Third World countries” and to reverse the admissions policies established during the Biden administration.

In a related development, Edlow indicated that officials would be reexamining green cards issued to immigrants from countries deemed concerning, including Afghanistan. USCIS has also introduced new national security measures to enhance the vetting process for immigrants from high-risk nations.

“I have directed a full-scale, rigorous reexamination of every Green Card for every alien from every country of concern,” Edlow stated.

Additionally, the Department of Homeland Security confirmed that it has suspended all immigration requests from Afghanistan and is reviewing all asylum cases that were approved under the Biden administration.

The Department of State has also acted swiftly, pausing all visa issuances for individuals traveling on Afghan passports in response to the shooting incident involving the National Guard members. “The Department is taking all necessary steps to protect U.S. national security and public safety,” the agency stated.

The shooting occurred on Wednesday, resulting in the death of National Guard member Sarah Beckstrom, 20, from West Virginia. Another service member, Andrew Wolfe, 24, remains in critical condition following the attack.

The alleged shooter, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, 29, has been charged with multiple offenses, including first-degree murder and two counts of assault with intent to kill while armed. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the Justice Department would seek the death penalty against Lakanwal.

Lakanwal entered the United States legally in 2021 under humanitarian parole as part of the Biden administration’s Operation Allies Welcome, which was established following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. He had been vetted by the CIA in Afghanistan due to his work with the agency and underwent additional vetting for his asylum application in the U.S. A senior U.S. official informed Fox News that Lakanwal was “clean on all checks” in his background investigation.

Notably, Lakanwal’s asylum application was approved by the Trump administration earlier this year. A report from the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General released in June indicated that there were “no systemic failures” in the vetting process for Afghan refugees or subsequent immigration pathways.

The recent shooting has raised significant concerns regarding the vetting processes for immigrants and asylum seekers, prompting federal agencies to reevaluate their procedures to ensure national security.

Source: Original article

Israel Releases Body-Cam Footage of Syria Raid on Terrorists

Israel’s military released body-camera footage of a gun battle in Syria that resulted in injuries to six soldiers during an operation targeting members of the al-Jama’a al-Islamiyya terrorist group.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) released body-camera footage on Friday from a rare confrontation in southern Syria, where troops from the 55th Brigade engaged in a gun battle while attempting to arrest members of al-Jama’a al-Islamiyya, a Sunni terrorist organization linked to the broader Muslim Brotherhood network. This cross-border incident coincides with heightened tensions between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Syria’s interim president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, as the Trump administration intensifies its focus on targeting affiliates of the Brotherhood.

The overnight operation occurred in the Beit Jann area, located approximately 10 kilometers inside Syrian territory, under the command of the 210th Division. According to the IDF, troops entered the region to detain suspects involved in planting improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and planning future attacks against Israel, including potential rocket fire. During the operation, two suspects were arrested before an exchange of gunfire erupted.

Six IDF soldiers sustained injuries in the clash, with three reported to be in serious condition. The IDF confirmed that several terrorists were killed during the encounter, and the arrested suspects were subsequently transferred to Israel for interrogation.

Al-Jama’a al-Islamiyya, which originated as the Lebanese branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, has collaborated with Hamas and Hezbollah, maintaining operational infrastructure in southern Lebanon and along the Syria-Lebanon border. The IDF has targeted the organization’s sites in both Syria and Lebanon multiple times during the ongoing conflict.

Political correspondent Amit Segal of Channel 12 noted that this incident marks the first time since December 2024, when Israeli forces took control of the Syrian side of Mount Hermon, that Israeli troops have been wounded in a firefight within Syria. Segal posed a critical question regarding the implications of this incident: “Could Syria become the IDF’s new Lebanon? With six soldiers wounded overnight, the big question is whether this is a one-off event, or if it signals the beginning of a long, uncomfortable Israeli presence in Syria.”

The tensions between Netanyahu and al-Sharaa have escalated following the latter’s unprecedented visit to Washington earlier this month. Al-Sharaa met with President Donald Trump at the White House to discuss sanctions relief and counterterrorism coordination, marking the first visit by a Syrian leader to Washington since the onset of the Syrian war. Netanyahu publicly criticized the visit, asserting that al-Sharaa “returned inflated with a sense of international legitimacy,” and cautioned that any discussions between the U.S. and Syria should not come at Israel’s expense.

Additional reports from the Jerusalem Post and Channel 12 indicated that security arrangements concerning Israel’s northern front were discussed in broad terms between U.S. and Syrian officials, although no formal agreements were reached. Washington emphasized that consultations with Israel were ongoing.

This clash occurred during a week in which the Trump administration launched a comprehensive initiative to designate Muslim Brotherhood affiliates as terrorist organizations. The White House directive instructs federal agencies to evaluate and impose sanctions on Brotherhood entities in various countries, including Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon, citing their global financial, political, and operational connections.

The White House statement described the Brotherhood as an organization that “fuels terrorism and destabilization campaigns against U.S. interests and allies.” Senator Ted Cruz, R-Texas, praised the administration’s actions during his podcast, stating that the designation represents the culmination of a decade of legislative efforts. Cruz remarked, “This is literally 10 years of hard work, and it will make America safer because the Muslim Brotherhood is funding terrorists that want to murder you and want to murder me.”

He highlighted that many U.S. allies in the Middle East, including Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the UAE, have already outlawed the organization, expressing that these nations desire the United States to take similar actions.

As the U.S. ramps up pressure on movements linked to the Brotherhood, Israel finds itself increasingly confronting armed groups associated with the organization across its northern borders—from Hamas in Gaza to al-Jama’a al-Islamiyya in Syria and Lebanon. With Beit Jann emerging as a focal point for cross-border operations and American policy tightening, analysts suggest that regional confrontations involving Brotherhood-connected groups may be entering a new phase.

Source: Original article

India and U.S. Collaborate to Disrupt Synthetic Drug Trafficking

New Delhi and Washington are intensifying their collaboration against synthetic drugs, which is proving effective in disrupting transnational trafficking networks and combating the opioid crisis.

WASHINGTON, DC – The United States and India are deepening their collaborative efforts to combat the growing threat of synthetic drugs. Officials and analysts have identified this increasing cooperation as a crucial element in disrupting transnational trafficking networks and curbing the spread of dangerous opioids.

A report released on November 28 highlights the evolution of the India–US counternarcotics partnership, which has transitioned from limited coordination to a robust security and public health alliance. The two nations have enhanced intelligence-sharing, conducted joint operations, and engaged in regulatory collaboration, resulting in significant drug seizures, arrests, and the dismantling of trafficking networks.

At the heart of this initiative is the India–US Counternarcotics Working Group, established in 2020 and now gearing up for its sixth annual meeting. This group has broadened its agenda over time, shifting focus from mere enforcement to encompass precursor chemical controls, harm reduction strategies, regulatory integrity, and public health measures. The fifth meeting, which took place in New Delhi in October 2024, prioritized the challenges posed by synthetic drugs, including fentanyl and amphetamine-type stimulants, along with the chemicals required for their production.

Given India’s significant role in global pharmaceutical production and exports, both countries recognize the importance of coordinated oversight of precursor chemicals as a vital strategy to curb the synthetic drug trade.

During a media briefing on November 26, Randhir Jaiswal, spokesperson for the Ministry of External Affairs, emphasized the positive impact of the partnership. He noted that enhanced information-sharing and joint operations with the United States have already led to substantial seizures and the dismantling of major trafficking networks. Jaiswal expressed the intention of both nations to further strengthen this cooperation.

Experts believe that the expanding partnership not only bolsters public safety in both countries but also has the potential to serve as a model for broader international cooperation against the rapidly evolving threats posed by synthetic drugs.

Source: Original article

Indian Ambassador and U.S. Official Discuss Trade and AI Cooperation

India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Mohan Kwatra, and U.S. Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs, Jacob Helberg, discussed enhancing the India-U.S. economic partnership, focusing on trade, technology, and artificial intelligence.

WASHINGTON — India’s Ambassador to the United States, Vinay Mohan Kwatra, recently engaged in extensive discussions with Jacob Helberg, the newly appointed U.S. Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs. Their meeting aimed to review and strengthen the economic partnership between India and the United States.

Kwatra shared insights about the discussions on X (formerly Twitter) on Wednesday, Indian time. He congratulated Helberg on his new role and exchanged views on critical aspects of the bilateral economic agenda. The dialogue encompassed progress toward a mutually beneficial trade agreement, a strategic trade dialogue, and enhanced cooperation in advanced technologies, particularly in artificial intelligence.

Helberg, who assumed office in mid-October, previously served as an advisor to the White House Council of Economic Advisors. He is the founder of the bipartisan The Hill and Valley Forum, which facilitates engagement between Silicon Valley leaders and U.S. lawmakers. According to the U.S. State Department, Helberg has collaborated closely with members of Congress on national security issues related to China. From 2022 to 2024, he served on the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, advocating for stronger industrial self-reliance and tariffs.

His professional background includes significant roles such as Senior Advisor to the CEO of Palantir Technologies, involvement in early-stage investments in high-growth technology companies, global leadership for Search policy at Google, and being part of the founding team at GeoQuant.

This meeting is part of a series of recent high-level engagements between Indian officials and U.S. policymakers. On November 24, Kwatra met with Jay Obernolte, Chair of the House Subcommittee on Research and Technology under the Science, Space, and Technology Committee. Their discussions focused on bolstering cooperation in science, innovation, artificial intelligence, and emerging technologies.

Additionally, last week, Kwatra held talks with John Barrasso, the Senate Majority Whip and a member of the Foreign Relations Committee. According to the ambassador, these conversations centered on advancing the strategic partnership between India and the United States, with an emphasis on balanced trade growth, increased oil and gas trade, and enhanced defense and security collaboration.

Earlier in October, India’s Minister of Commerce and Industry, Piyush Goyal, remarked that trade talks between the two nations are progressing steadily. He expressed confidence in moving toward a fair and equitable bilateral trade agreement in the near future.

As both nations continue to engage at high levels, the focus remains on fostering a robust economic partnership that addresses mutual interests in trade, technology, and security.

Source: Original article

Airbus Orders Emergency Fixes for A320 Aircraft, Impacting Indian Airlines

Airbus has mandated urgent technical updates for thousands of A320-family aircraft, prompting significant flight disruptions worldwide, particularly affecting Indian airlines such as IndiGo and Air India.

Flight operations across the globe are poised for major disruptions following an urgent directive from Airbus, the European aircraft manufacturer. The company has ordered immediate technical updates for a substantial number of its A320-family aircraft, which includes the A319, A320, and A321 models.

This directive necessitates software modifications and, in certain cases, hardware adjustments to be completed before the next scheduled flight of each affected aircraft. The corrective measures were prompted by Airbus’s discovery that intense solar radiation could interfere with critical flight control data, potentially jeopardizing aircraft stability.

Industry estimates suggest that thousands of aircraft worldwide will require immediate rectification, including approximately 300 planes in India. The Indian airlines most impacted by this directive are IndiGo and Air India, which operate the largest fleets of A320-family aircraft in the country. IndiGo currently has around 370 A320-family jets, while Air India operates 127, and its low-cost subsidiary, Air India Express, has 40 aircraft from the same family.

Most of these jets will need the software update, which is expected to take several hours per aircraft. Although individual groundings are anticipated to be brief, the high daily utilization of narrow-body aircraft means that even minor delays can escalate into widespread flight disruptions. Indian airlines expect the rectification process across their fleets to take between two to three days, although the overall operational impact remains uncertain.

In an official statement, Airbus acknowledged the potential for operational disruptions, stating, “We acknowledge that these actions will cause operational disruption for passengers and airlines. Safety, however, remains our highest priority.”

Following Airbus’s announcement, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) issued an Emergency Airworthiness Directive. This directive mandates that all operators of affected A320-family aircraft complete the prescribed fixes before resuming flight operations. With over 11,000 A320-family aircraft in service globally, it is estimated that more than half are subject to this advisory.

The EASA directive was prompted by an incident involving an A320 that experienced an uncommanded pitch-down movement while the autopilot was engaged. Although the remainder of the flight proceeded without incident, Airbus’s preliminary investigation indicated a malfunction in the Elevator Aileron Computer (ELAC) system. If left unaddressed, such a malfunction could lead to structural stress on the aircraft due to unintended elevator movement.

ELAC is a vital flight-control computer that processes pilot input and manages the aircraft’s pitch and roll through its elevators and ailerons.

In response to the situation, IndiGo confirmed that it is already implementing Airbus’s instructions. An IndiGo spokesperson stated, “We are working closely with the manufacturer to carry out the required inspections and updates while minimizing disruption. Safety remains our top priority.”

Air India also addressed the issue in a post on X, noting that part of its A320 fleet will undergo necessary software and hardware realignment, which may lead to longer turnaround times and operational delays. The airline expressed its apologies to passengers for any inconvenience during this update period.

Air India Express has also confirmed that it has initiated precautionary measures. While most of its aircraft are not directly impacted, the airline warned that the global directive could still result in schedule changes, delays, or cancellations as safety procedures are implemented.

As the aviation industry grapples with these urgent updates, the focus remains on ensuring passenger safety while minimizing operational disruptions.

Source: Original article

Cultivating Saffron and Community Among Indian-Americans in Santa Clara Valley

Wasim Sahibzada, a fourth-generation saffron farmer from Kashmir, is cultivating saffron in Santa Clara Valley, blending tradition with modern agricultural practices to enrich the local community.

Wasim Sahibzada, a fourth-generation farmer hailing from a distinguished saffron-producing family in Kashmir, India, carries a legacy steeped in passion and expertise in saffron cultivation. This deep-rooted connection has inspired him to continue his family’s proud tradition in the Bay Area.

To support Wasim in his saffron-farming journey, the Open Space Authority has leased him a one-acre plot in Coyote Valley, located just south of San José. This opportunity allows Wasim to introduce the rich heritage of saffron cultivation to the Santa Clara Valley, contributing to the region’s vital agricultural landscape.

A saffron flower is intricately linked to its bulb, known as a “corm.” Each corm can produce one to three flowers simultaneously and has the potential to yield additional flowers one to two more times during the harvest season. The saffron threads, which are the coveted spice, are derived from the red stigmas of these flowers.

Once celebrated as the “Valley of Heart’s Delight” due to its abundance of fruit orchards, much of Santa Clara Valley’s active agricultural land is situated between San José and Morgan Hill. Farmers and ranchers in this region work tirelessly to cultivate the land, producing fresh food that boosts the economy and fosters healthier communities. However, contemporary farmers face numerous challenges that threaten their ability to sustain a livelihood.

The Open Space Authority is dedicated to preserving this crucial farmland and supporting farmers like Wasim by providing affordable land for culturally significant and sustainable farming practices. While saffron may not be a conventional crop for the area, it is individuals like Wasim, with their passion, integrity, and commitment to farming, who inspire the Authority to continue its efforts to safeguard Santa Clara Valley’s agricultural legacy.

Saffron, scientifically known as Crocus sativus, originates from a striking purple flower that grows from a round, bulbous seed called a “corm.” During each harvest season, a corm can sprout one to three flowers. If a flower is plucked, it can reproduce one to two additional times before entering dormancy for the winter. The red stigmas, or saffron “threads,” are carefully detached from the flower and dried for use as a spice, dye, fragrance, or medicinal ingredient.

Historically, saffron was introduced to the Kashmir region of India around 500 B.C. Today, Kashmir remains the second-largest producer of saffron globally. Traditionally, saffron is used to enhance the color and flavor of various dishes, including rice, desserts, and teas. It is also believed to possess anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and mood-enhancing properties, making it a highly sought-after remedy in Ayurvedic, Persian, and Chinese medicinal practices, as well as a popular ingredient in modern cosmetics. For many cultures, saffron’s golden-red hue symbolizes sacredness, vitality, and good fortune, often featuring in religious rituals, festivals, and celebrations. For Wasim, saffron embodies family and tradition.

In 2024, Wasim continued his family’s legacy by planting saffron corms at his Bay Area home. “California has the ideal temperatures, conditions, and soil for saffron cultivation,” he remarked. This crop typically thrives in regions with dry summers, cool winters, and well-drained soil. However, growing saffron is no simple task; it demands a labor of love that Wasim is continually striving to refine.

“Saffron is more than just a spice; it’s a labor-intensive crop that carries centuries of cultural, medicinal, and culinary heritage,” Wasim explained. “Cultivating it requires patience, care, and respect for the land, and its value reflects both its rarity and the dedication behind every thread.”

Once his initial saffron corms bloomed, Wasim aimed to expand his cultivation efforts. However, finding a suitable plot of land for saffron farming proved challenging due to the competitive and costly agricultural market. Undeterred, Wasim networked within agricultural circles to garner support for his new venture. Eventually, he connected with Julie Morris, Santa Clara County’s Agricultural Liaison, who introduced him to the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority.

“Wasim is a perfect example of how Santa Clara County continues to be a land of opportunity, not only for tech entrepreneurs but also for innovative and young farmers,” Morris stated. “The Authority’s support of young farmers like Wasim underscores their commitment to protecting the most important remaining farmlands in Coyote Valley while creating economic opportunities for our agricultural community.”

Wasim’s saffron pilot project launched in September 2024. Despite a late start to the season, he experienced success with saffron flowers blooming just a few months later in November. As his business continues to grow, Wasim is eager to produce more blooms and invite the community to his farm for a unique u-pick experience, allowing visitors to harvest their own saffron and take home a piece of his culture. Through this initiative, Wasim hopes to foster a deeper appreciation for saffron’s history, harvesting process, and diverse applications.

“Saffron has always been in my blood, and the idea of cultivating it here came naturally,” Wasim reflected. “California has everything – almonds, walnuts, grapes, oranges, wine. It ought to have its own saffron too.”

Source: Original article

Trump Proposes ‘Reverse Migration’ Plan to Address Immigration Issues

Former President Donald Trump unveiled a “reverse migration” plan aimed at halting immigration from certain countries and rolling back Biden-era policies in a recent Truth Social post.

Former President Donald Trump took to Truth Social late on Thanksgiving to announce his “reverse migration” plan, which he claims would permanently stop immigration from what he refers to as “Third World Countries.” He also proposed a comprehensive rollback of immigration policies established during President Biden’s administration.

In his post, Trump asserted that his administration would impose a pause on all migration from nations he categorizes as “Third World.” He claimed that this plan would revoke what he described as “millions” of admissions granted under Biden, including those he alleges were signed by “Sleepy Joe Biden’s Autopen.” Furthermore, Trump indicated that he would seek to remove foreign nationals whom he considers public charges, security threats, or those he believes are “non-compatible with Western Civilization.”

Trump contended that the current U.S. immigration system is overwhelmed and that his proposed approach would allow it to “fully recover.” Among his promises, he vowed to eliminate federal benefits for noncitizens, denaturalize migrants accused of undermining “domestic tranquility,” and expand deportation efforts.

Trump’s announcement comes in the wake of a violent incident near the White House, where two National Guard members were shot in what officials described as a “targeted” attack. One of the guardsmen, 20-year-old Sarah Beckstrom from West Virginia, was reported dead, while the second service member, 24-year-old Andrew Wolfe, is currently “fighting for his life,” according to Trump.

The suspected shooter, 29-year-old Rahmanullah Lakanwal, is also in serious condition. Lakanwal entered the United States legally in 2021 under humanitarian parole as part of the Biden administration’s Operation Allies Welcome, which was initiated following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.

In closing, Trump issued a stern warning in his social media post: “Other than that, HAPPY THANKSGIVING TO ALL, except those that hate, steal, murder, and destroy everything that America stands for — You won’t be here for long!”

Source: Original article

Putin Describes Trump’s Peace Plan as ‘Starting Point’ for Ukraine

Vladimir Putin has expressed interest in discussing President Trump’s Ukraine peace proposal as tensions escalate, warning Ukraine to withdraw or face military action.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has indicated a willingness to consider President Donald Trump’s peace proposal as a potential starting point for negotiations aimed at resolving the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia. Speaking to reporters at the conclusion of a three-day visit to Kyrgyzstan, Putin emphasized the importance of serious dialogue regarding the proposal, stating, “We need to sit down and discuss this seriously.” He noted that “every word matters” in the context of the discussions.

Putin characterized Trump’s plan as “a set of issues put forward for discussion” rather than a formal draft agreement. His comments come as U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff is set to visit Moscow, underscoring the urgency of the situation.

In a stark warning, Putin stated, “If Ukrainian troops withdraw from the territories they occupy, hostilities will cease. If they don’t withdraw, we will achieve this by force.” This declaration raises concerns about the potential for increased military action should Ukraine fail to comply with Russia’s demands.

Andy Barr, a Republican member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, commented on the situation, asserting that it highlights the necessity for strong American leadership. “Russia invaded Ukraine because Joe Biden was the weakest president in American history,” Barr claimed. He further stated, “President Trump’s peace-through-strength leadership kept Putin fully contained. This war never would have happened under his watch. Trump is the peace president… the only leader who can end this war and bring stability back to Europe.”

However, critics of Putin argue that he may be attempting to manipulate the U.S. and the European Union. Garry Kasparov, the former world chess champion and a vocal critic of the Russian leader, expressed skepticism about the prospects for peace. He told the Polish international news network TVP, “Peace under Putin is unachievable for one simple reason: Putin is war — and Russia is gearing up for even more.” Kasparov has also criticized NATO, Trump, and the EU for their perceived failures in adequately supporting Ukraine and expelling Russian forces from its territory.

As discussions about a potential peace agreement continue, Kremlin officials have remained largely silent regarding Trump’s recent proposal. Historically, Putin has been reluctant to accept previous peace plans put forth by Trump.

Putin has insisted that Ukraine must completely withdraw from the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhia regions before any peace negotiations can commence. This demand notably includes areas within these regions that are not currently under Russian occupation. Additionally, Putin seeks to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO and hosting any Western military forces, aiming to reestablish Russian influence over the country.

Recent assessments from the Institute for the Study of War have cast doubt on Russian claims of an unstoppable invasion, noting that Russian forces are still struggling to capture key cities in the eastern Donetsk region. The think tank stated, “Data on Russian forces’ rate of advance indicates that a Russian military victory in Ukraine is not inevitable, and a rapid Russian seizure of the rest of Donetsk Oblast is not imminent.” They further observed that recent Russian advances have been largely opportunistic and dependent on favorable seasonal weather conditions.

As diplomatic efforts continue, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff is scheduled to visit Moscow next week. Meanwhile, U.S. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, who has played a prominent role in recent peace initiatives, may also be heading to Kyiv to engage in discussions.

The initial U.S. peace proposal faced criticism for being overly favorable to Russian demands. However, an amended version emerged from talks in Geneva between American and Ukrainian officials, reflecting a more balanced approach. European leaders, concerned about their own security in light of Russian aggression, are also seeking a more active role in the peace process.

As the situation evolves, the international community remains watchful, hoping for a resolution that can bring an end to the conflict and restore stability to the region.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Faces Lawsuit Over Permanent Housing Funding

The Trump administration faces a lawsuit from a coalition of 19 attorneys general and two governors over significant funding cuts for permanent housing aimed at individuals experiencing homelessness.

The Trump administration is once again embroiled in legal challenges, as a coalition of 19 attorneys general and two governors filed a lawsuit on Tuesday. The suit targets recent policy changes that impose new conditions and drastically reduce funding for permanent housing for individuals experiencing homelessness.

The lawsuit claims that the administration has unlawfully decreased the percentage of federal grant funding allocated to permanent housing from approximately 90% to as low as 30%. Additionally, it introduces new eligibility requirements that could further complicate access to these essential resources.

Leading the coalition is New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is seeking a court order to block what she describes as the “administration’s cuts and illegal new conditions” affecting the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Continuum of Care program funding.

“Communities across the country depend on Continuum of Care funds to provide housing and other resources to our most vulnerable neighbors,” James stated in a press release. “These funds help keep tens of thousands of people from sleeping on the streets every night. I will not allow this administration to cut off these funds and put vital housing and support services at risk.”

According to reports, more than half of the 2026 funding for HUD’s Continuum of Care program, which collaborates with local organizations to connect people experiencing homelessness to housing and resources, will be redirected from permanent housing assistance to temporary transitional housing assistance. This shift will come with new work or service requirements for recipients.

A spokesperson for HUD expressed disappointment over the lawsuit, stating, “HUD stands by its FY2025 Continuum of Care reforms.” The spokesperson further criticized the plaintiffs for what they termed a misuse of the courts, suggesting that the lawsuit serves a political agenda at the expense of homeless individuals, youth, and families currently living on the streets.

“Their use of the courts for political means seeks to prevent nearly $4 billion of aid from flowing nationwide to assist those in need,” the spokesperson added. “HUD intends to mount a vigorous defense to this meritless legal action.”

Permanent housing programs are designed to offer long-term stability without requiring participation in work programs or other services. This approach allows residents to focus on maintaining their housing and rebuilding their lives. Critics of the administration’s new policy argue that reallocating funds to transitional housing or imposing service requirements could destabilize current residents, potentially forcing them back into homelessness or reliance on emergency shelters.

Supporters of the policy, however, argue that linking funding to services or work expectations can promote self-sufficiency and ensure that resources are utilized efficiently. This situation highlights the ongoing tension between immediate stability and longer-term social outcomes.

The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for how federal housing funds are allocated and regulated at the national level. It underscores the critical roles that courts, state governments, and federal agencies play in shaping policy priorities and protecting vulnerable populations.

Beyond the legal ramifications, this dispute brings attention to the persistent challenges in addressing homelessness, emphasizing the importance of stable housing for social and economic well-being. It also reflects the complexities involved in implementing programs that cater to diverse communities with varying needs.

Source: Original article

Politician Named Adolf Hitler Sparks Controversy in Local Election Campaign

Namibian politician Adolf Hitler Uunona, named after the infamous dictator, seeks re-election in regional elections, asserting that his name carries no ideological significance.

A local politician in Namibia, Adolf Hitler Uunona, is poised to retain his council seat in the upcoming regional elections, attracting international attention due to his controversial name. Uunona, a longtime member of Namibia’s ruling SWAPO party, is campaigning in the Ompundja constituency located in the northern Oshana region.

While final election results have yet to be announced, several international news outlets project that Uunona will win by a significant margin, consistent with his performance in previous elections. SWAPO, which has governed Namibia since the country gained independence in 1990, has transitioned from its socialist roots to adopt a more centrist, market-oriented approach to governance.

The name “Adolf Hitler” was given to Uunona by his father, who, according to Uunona, did not fully grasp the historical implications associated with it. In an interview with the German outlet Bild, Uunona reflected on his childhood, stating, “It was a perfectly normal name for me when I was a kid. It wasn’t until I grew older that I realized this man wanted to subjugate the whole world and killed millions of Jews.”

Uunona emphasized that his name does not reflect any political ideology and insisted that he has never held extremist beliefs. “The fact I have this name does not mean I want to conquer Oshana,” he remarked, noting that he generally goes by Adolf Uunona in his daily life.

Namibia was a German colony from 1884 to 1915, and the influence of this colonial past is still evident, with Germanic names and place names remaining prevalent in certain communities. Historians point out that this legacy can lead to unusual name combinations that may seem jarring by contemporary standards, yet they do not carry any inherent ideological significance.

According to official data from the Oshana regional government, the Ompundja constituency has a population of 4,659 residents, encompasses 19 administrative centers, and covers an area of 466 square kilometers.

As Uunona campaigns for re-election, his unique name continues to spark discussions about Namibia’s colonial history and the complexities of identity in a post-colonial context. His case serves as a reminder of how historical legacies can shape personal identities in unexpected ways.

Source: Original article

Alleged National Guard Shooter Previously Worked with U.S. Government in Afghanistan

The Afghan national accused of shooting two National Guard members near the White House previously worked with U.S. government entities, including the CIA, during his time in Afghanistan.

An Afghan national has been accused of shooting two National Guard members in Washington, D.C., just blocks from the White House. The suspect, identified as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, 29, reportedly worked with various U.S. government entities, including the CIA, while serving as a member of a partner force in Afghanistan.

Lakanwal entered the United States shortly after the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, arriving a month later under “Operation Allies Welcome.” This program was initiated to assist Afghan allies who had worked with U.S. forces during the two-decade-long conflict.

Intelligence sources informed Fox News Digital that Lakanwal had established a relationship with U.S. government entities due to his involvement with a partner force in Kandahar. CIA Director John Ratcliffe emphasized that the Biden administration justified Lakanwal’s entry into the U.S. based on his previous work with the CIA and other government agencies.

“In the wake of the disastrous Biden withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Biden administration justified bringing the alleged shooter to the United States in September 2021 due to his prior work with the U.S. government, including the CIA,” Ratcliffe stated. “The individual—and so many others—should have never been allowed to come here.” He further expressed concern over the ongoing repercussions of the administration’s actions, stating, “Our citizens and service members deserve far better than to endure the ongoing fallout from the Biden administration’s catastrophic failures.”

The FBI is currently leading the investigation into the shooting, which is being examined as a potential act of international terrorism. Officials confirmed that the two West Virginia National Guardsmen involved in the incident remain in critical condition.

In a national address following the shooting, former President Donald Trump condemned the attack, labeling it a “savage attack.” He described the incident as a “monstrous ambush-style attack” that occurred just steps away from the White House. Trump characterized the shooting as a “heinous assault,” an “act of evil,” and a “crime against our entire nation.” He expressed his condolences to the families of the injured Guardsmen, stating, “The hearts of all Americans tonight are with those two members of the West Virginia National Guard and their families.” He also conveyed a sense of righteous anger and determination to ensure that the perpetrator faces severe consequences.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser addressed the media shortly after the incident, confirming that the shooting was a targeted attack. “One individual appeared to target these guardsmen. That individual has been taken into custody,” she explained during a news conference.

The investigation is ongoing, and authorities are working to uncover further details surrounding the shooting and the suspect’s background.

Source: Original article

Andrew Sherman Discusses Inflection Points and Intangible Assets

Andrew Sherman emphasizes the importance of recognizing internal intangible assets during organizational inflection points, urging leaders to look inward rather than chase external trends.

At the American Bazaar’s Leadership @ Inflection Points conference held in Vienna, Virginia, on November 14, attorney and strategist Andrew J. Sherman challenged business leaders to shift their focus from external trends to the hidden assets within their organizations.

In his keynote address, Sherman, a partner at Brown Rudnick LLP and a noted expert on business growth and intellectual property, warned against the tendency to pursue “bright shiny objects” instead of recognizing the inherent value already present in their enterprises.

“An inflection point,” Sherman explained to an audience of executives and entrepreneurs, “is not a time to freeze, or to chase the next shiny thing. It’s a time to look within—to lift up the sofa cushion, and see what hidden coins you already have.”

This metaphor succinctly encapsulated Sherman’s message: organizations frequently overlook their most valuable assets precisely when they need clarity the most.

According to Sherman, every organization—be it a Fortune 500 company, a university, or even a sports team—will encounter a turning point. “It’s a natural evolution,” he stated. “The question is not if the inflection point comes, but how leaders respond when it does.”

He noted that many leaders fall victim to what he termed “deer-in-the-headlights syndrome,” becoming paralyzed by indecision until opportunities slip away. Others mistakenly equate activity with progress, spending resources on consultants and transformation plans without making meaningful advancements.

Instead, Sherman advocated for a more introspective approach, encouraging leaders to take stock of their internal strengths—a practice that many organizations neglect.

In his talk, Sherman referenced his influential book, *Harvesting Intangible Assets*, which delves into how companies can unlock the unseen value embedded in their intellectual property, systems, and organizational culture.

He pointed out that while most companies can accurately account for their physical assets, such as desks and computers, few can effectively quantify their intangible assets, which include data, processes, customer relationships, distribution networks, and brand equity.

“We’re still living in the 1950s when it comes to accounting,” Sherman remarked. “Look at public companies today. The physical assets on their balance sheets are a fraction of their market value.”

He cited Nvidia as a prime example, noting that the chipmaker’s market capitalization recently exceeded $4 trillion, yet only about half a trillion of that is tied to physical assets. “That means three and a half trillion dollars of value isn’t accounted for on the balance sheet—except under ‘goodwill,’” he explained.

Historically, intangible assets have grown to represent a significant portion of corporate value. In 1975, tangible assets made up approximately 83 percent of corporate value; today, intangible assets account for nearly 90 percent.

Sherman cautioned that organizations often pursue new ventures or technologies—what he referred to as “bright shiny objects”—instead of examining their existing resources. He recalled advice from a fishing guide during a trip to Canada with his son: “Don’t leave fish to find fish.”

“In business,” Sherman said, “leaders leave what’s working to chase the next big thing—when the real opportunities are right there under their nose.”

He humorously reiterated the couch-cushion metaphor, stating, “Yes, when you lift it up, you’ll find some Cheerios and dust. But you’ll also find coins. Those coins are your hidden assets—things you already own but haven’t leveraged.”

For Sherman, the issue isn’t a lack of innovation but rather a lack of awareness. “Too many leaders are surrounded by people saying, ‘We’re great, we just need small changes.’ But what if the assets you need are already there—you’re just not managing them?”

He shared a personal anecdote from his early legal career in the 1980s, recounting a $500,000 business acquisition where the tangible assets only totaled $490,000. In a moment of panic, he approached his senior partner, who simply advised him to “add a line item called goodwill.”

This experience underscored Sherman’s message at the conference: in an era fixated on disruption, true innovation may not stem from seeking the next big thing but from recognizing the quiet power of existing resources.

As a seasoned advisor to Fortune 500 companies, Sherman provided insights from his work with Walmart, highlighting the company’s supply chain and distribution system as a “treasure chest of intangible value.”

“I once showed them how they could create $50 or $100 million in new revenue through underutilized assets,” he said. “They told me, ‘That’s like a fly on an elephant’s rear end—we only get excited when the number starts with a B.’ But from a shareholder perspective, that’s still real value. If you don’t use it, someone else will.”

To illustrate how overlooked ideas can yield significant returns, Sherman recounted the story of Dunkin’ Donuts’ “Munchkins.” Initially, the holes from the doughnut machine were discarded, but someone proposed selling them, turning what was once waste into a profitable product.

He challenged the audience to consider, “What’s the ‘Dunkin’ Munchkin’ in your organization? I guarantee you have one—probably several.”

Sherman argued that the mismanagement of intangible assets represents a global issue that squanders vast potential wealth. He cited estimates suggesting that $40 trillion worth of unused or underutilized intangible assets exists worldwide—ideas, technologies, and systems languishing in archives and corporate backrooms.

“Whether you’re in government, academia, or the private sector,” he stated, “we waste resources and innovation because we don’t know what we have.”

He highlighted the inefficiencies in universities and research institutions, noting that Stanford converts only about 5% of its R&D spending into income, while the University of Maryland achieves a mere 0.75% return. “That means for every $100 spent, the return is 75 cents. That’s embarrassing,” he remarked.

Sherman called for stronger partnerships between entrepreneurs and academics to commercialize discoveries that would otherwise remain dormant. “If professors are too busy being academics, that’s fine,” he said, “but let entrepreneurs in to build something with those ideas.”

Throughout his address, Sherman reiterated a central theme: inflection points should not provoke panic or reckless reinvention but should be seen as opportunities for reflection and internal innovation.

“Inflection points,” he concluded, “are not a time for the deer-in-the-headlights syndrome, or for the hamster-on-a-wheel response, or to spend a fortune on consultants. They’re a time to ask: What assets do we already have that could create new revenue, new markets, new opportunities?”

His message resonated with the audience of founders, executives, and innovators, many of whom are navigating their own organizational crossroads in a rapidly changing economy.

“The assets already exist,” Sherman emphasized. “They’re just under your seat, under the sofa cushion. The question is: are you willing to look?”

Source: Original article

Cuts and Costs Could Impact U.S. Healthcare Access by 2026

Experts warn that impending budget cuts and legislative changes could severely undermine healthcare access for millions of Americans by 2026, reversing a decade of progress in coverage and affordability.

As prices continue to rise and corporate layoffs accumulate, many Americans find themselves grappling with the complexities of late-year budgeting. The economic landscape, already under strain, may soon face even greater pressure.

A confluence of budget cuts, legislative reforms, and the expiration of federal aid is poised to inflict significant damage on the American healthcare system by 2026. This situation threatens to undo years of progress in expanding coverage and could push healthcare costs beyond the reach of countless consumers.

This grim outlook was shared by health policy experts during a briefing hosted by American Community Media on November 21, 2025. The panel, which included Tomas Bednar from Healthsperien, Amber Christ from Justice in Aging, and Sophia Tripoli from Families USA, highlighted three main themes driving this crisis: soaring costs, diminishing access, and ongoing political gridlock.

The most immediate concern is the expiration of enhanced premium tax credits (APTCs). These credits, which help make insurance affordable on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace, are utilized by approximately 22 million Americans—about 92 percent of individual market beneficiaries. Without the reinstatement of these credits, consumers could see their monthly premiums rise by as much as 70 percent, with some households facing even steeper increases based on their income, plan, and location. Insurers project that premiums in 2026 will be 25 percent higher, even before accounting for the loss of APTCs.

Adding to this crisis are sweeping cuts to public health programs. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates a $45 billion reduction in the Medicare budget for the upcoming year, which translates to a staggering $536 billion over the next decade. Furthermore, the legislation known as HR1, referred to as the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” proposes to cut $900 billion from the Medicaid budget over ten years while imposing new work requirements that many current beneficiaries may struggle to meet.

Amber Christ of Justice in Aging emphasized that HR1 is particularly harmful to older adults, as it would terminate Medicare eligibility for numerous lawfully present immigrants, including refugees and asylum seekers, many of whom have contributed to Medicare through taxes for years. At a broader level, the legislation imposes a significant financial burden on states, compelling them to confront substantial deficits in their Medicaid budgets and leaving them with limited options to address these shortfalls—ultimately resulting in reduced access for consumers.

The threat to healthcare access extends further to immigrant communities through the reintroduction of the “public charge” rule by the current administration. Bednar explained that this rule, which has undergone numerous policy changes over the past eight years, allows immigration officials to consider an applicant’s use of public benefits, such as Medicaid, when evaluating their eligibility for permanent residency status. He noted that this creates a “chilling effect,” discouraging eligible immigrants from applying for essential benefits due to fears that it could jeopardize their immigration status. Bednar characterized this move as part of a broader “attack on Medicaid,” which includes restricting access to emergency healthcare for specific immigrant populations under HR1.

As many individuals face rising premiums and potential loss of coverage, Sophia Tripoli of Families USA highlighted that merely extending tax credits is insufficient to address an already strained healthcare infrastructure. She stated, “The number one driver of unavoidable healthcare in America is not overuse or bad decisions; it’s prices.”

Tripoli argued that the nation is grappling with an affordability crisis primarily rooted in high prices rather than overutilization or poor decision-making. These escalating costs are driven by two structural factors: corporate consolidation and payment incentives that prioritize volume over value. According to Tripoli, fewer companies now dominate the market across hospitals, physician practices, and pharmaceutical companies, granting them greater power to raise prices. Additionally, the existing fee-for-service model incentivizes “doing more, not doing better,” neglecting preventive care and financial security.

The cumulative effect of these political and systemic failures is a domino effect impacting the entire population. Consumers are increasingly compelled to delay or forgo necessary care due to high deductibles and out-of-pocket expenses, resulting in higher mortality rates and greater reliance on costly emergency room services.

As 2026 approaches, an election year presents a unique opportunity for lawmakers to address the intertwined issues of coverage and affordability. Experts agree that a bold, bipartisan agenda is essential, focusing on systemic changes such as curbing provider consolidation, restricting predatory billing practices, and modernizing payment models to prioritize health outcomes. Christ cautioned, “You cannot cut nearly $1 trillion out of the healthcare system without severe ramifications across society.”

Source: Original article

F-1 Visa Update: DIGNITY Act of 2025 Targets ‘Intent to Leave’ Rule

The DIGNITY Act of 2025 aims to eliminate the “Intent to Leave” requirement for foreign students applying for F-1 visas, potentially reshaping U.S. immigration policy for international education.

The number of international students selecting the United States as their study destination has been on a steady decline, largely due to stricter immigration enforcement and heightened visa scrutiny under recent U.S. policies. In response to these concerns, lawmakers have introduced the DIGNITY Act of 2025, a proposed reform designed to eliminate the long-standing “Intent to Leave” rule that currently impacts foreign students applying for F-1 visas.

While the proposed repeal could facilitate the process for students seeking U.S. study visas, another suggested change involving fixed-term admissions may introduce new challenges for international students.

The DIGNITY Act of 2025 has been jointly introduced by Congresswomen María Elvira Salazar and Veronica Escobar, along with a bipartisan group of 20 co-sponsors. A central element of the bill is the proposal to abolish the “Intent to Leave” requirement, which currently mandates that international students prove their intention to return to their home country after completing their studies.

If passed, the Act could significantly alter the evaluation process for student visa applications in the U.S.

Currently, F-1 visa applicants must demonstrate non-immigrant intent, which requires them to declare plans to leave the U.S. after finishing their education, show strong ties to their home country, and provide evidence such as property ownership, family connections, or employment prospects. Failure to convincingly prove intent to return often results in visa denials, even for academically qualified students.

The proposed repeal under the DIGNITY Act would eliminate this specific barrier, meaning future student visa decisions would no longer hinge solely on a student’s declared intention to leave the U.S. after graduation. However, it is important to note that this change does not grant automatic permission to remain in the U.S. after studies. Students wishing to stay must still qualify for appropriate employment-based or other legal immigration categories.

In tandem with the proposed repeal, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has suggested a regulatory shift that could affect student stay limits. This proposal seeks to change student admissions from a “Duration of Status” to a fixed time period. Currently, the “duration of status” allows students to remain in the U.S. as long as they maintain valid student status. Under the proposed system, students would be admitted for a specific, pre-determined time frame, after which they would be required to exit the country—even if their academic program is still ongoing.

This change would apply to holders of F, J, and I visas and could create uncertainty for students facing program extensions, research delays, or medical or academic interruptions.

If implemented together, these two policy changes could yield mixed outcomes for international students. On the one hand, the removal of the “intent to return” requirement could lead to easier visa approvals and reduced rejections based solely on immigration suspicion, potentially improving confidence among international applicants. On the other hand, strict exit deadlines under fixed-term admissions could result in increased paperwork for extensions and greater uncertainty for long-term academic programs.

It is essential for students to understand that the DIGNITY Act of 2025 is still a proposal and has not yet become law. The fixed-term admissions policy is still under regulatory review, and existing F-1 rules remain in effect until formal changes are enacted. Students must continue to adhere to all post-study visa procedures for legal residency.

In conclusion, the DIGNITY Act of 2025 represents a significant step toward easing one of the most restrictive aspects of U.S. student visa policy. The removal of the Intent to Leave rule could encourage more international students to consider U.S. education once again. However, the proposed shift to fixed-term admissions may introduce new uncertainties that students will need to navigate carefully.

As reforms continue to evolve, international applicants should stay informed, seek proper guidance, and plan well in advance.

Source: Original article

Judge Allows West Virginia Parents to Opt Out of Vaccine Requirements for Religious Reasons

West Virginia families can now opt out of school vaccine requirements based on religious beliefs, following a judge’s ruling that challenges previous state policies.

In a significant ruling on Wednesday, a West Virginia judge determined that parents can invoke their religious beliefs to exempt their children from mandatory school vaccination requirements. Raleigh County Circuit Judge Michael Froble issued a permanent injunction allowing children from families who object to the state’s compulsory vaccination law on religious grounds to attend school and participate in extracurricular activities.

Judge Froble’s decision found that a state policy preventing parents from seeking religious exemptions violated the Equal Protection for Religion Act, which was signed into law in 2023 by then-Governor Jim Justice. Prior to this ruling, West Virginia was one of the few states that only permitted medical exemptions for school vaccinations. Earlier this year, Governor Patrick Morrisey issued an executive order that allowed for religious exemptions, but the state Board of Education subsequently voted to disregard this order, insisting that public schools adhere to existing vaccination requirements as outlined in state law.

In response to the ruling, the Board of Education announced that it would “hereby suspend the policy on compulsory vaccination requirements” while an appeal is pending before the state Supreme Court. Governor Morrisey expressed his support for the ruling, stating that it represents a victory for families who have been barred from school attendance due to their faith.

The legal battle was initiated by two groups who contested Morrisey’s executive order, arguing that the authority to establish vaccination policies lies with the legislature, not the governor. Although legislation permitting religious exemptions was passed by the state Senate, it was ultimately rejected by the House of Delegates earlier this year. Judge Froble clarified that the failure to enact this legislation did not negate the application of the 2023 law, emphasizing that legislative intent is not the sole determinant in interpreting statutes.

A group of parents had filed a lawsuit against the state and local education boards, as well as the Raleigh County schools superintendent. One parent had successfully obtained a religious exemption from the state health department and enrolled her child in elementary school for the current academic year. However, the local school superintendent rescinded this exemption in June, prompting the legal action.

In July, Judge Froble granted a preliminary injunction that allowed the children of the three families involved in the lawsuit to attend school for the current year. Last month, he expanded the case into a class action, which now includes 570 families across the state who have received religious exemptions. This class action also applies to parents seeking religious exemptions in the future.

Judge Froble noted that the number of exemptions granted thus far represents a small fraction of the overall student population in West Virginia and would not significantly impact vaccination rates or pose increased health risks. State law mandates that children receive vaccinations for several diseases, including chickenpox, hepatitis B, measles, meningitis, mumps, diphtheria, polio, rubella, tetanus, and whooping cough before they can attend school.

Currently, at least 30 states have enacted laws that protect religious freedoms, modeled after the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which was signed into law in 1993 by then-President Bill Clinton. This federal law allows individuals to challenge federal regulations that interfere with their religious beliefs.

As the legal proceedings continue, the implications of this ruling may reshape the landscape of vaccination policies in West Virginia and potentially influence similar discussions in other states.

Source: Original article

Canada Accelerates Efforts to Resume Trade Talks with India

Canada is accelerating efforts to revive a long-stalled trade agreement with India, following a period of diplomatic tensions and shifting foreign policy priorities.

TORONTO — Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand announced on Monday that Ottawa is working diligently to revive a long-delayed trade agreement with India, following two years of diplomatic tensions. This renewed push aligns with Canada’s updated foreign policy approach, particularly in response to the ongoing trade war initiated by former U.S. President Donald Trump.

Anand’s remarks followed a meeting between Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the recent G20 summit in South Africa. Both leaders agreed to reopen negotiations that have been stalled for over a year.

A Relationship Recovering After Tension

Diplomatic relations between Canada and India deteriorated sharply in 2023 when Canadian authorities accused the Indian government of being involved in the assassination of Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in British Columbia.

The leaders emphasized the need for a swift progression in negotiations. “The leaders were clear that the process must move forward as quickly as possible,” Anand told The Associated Press, underscoring Canada’s commitment to advancing talks without delay.

Prime Minister Carney is expected to travel to India early next year, further signaling the commitment to revitalizing bilateral relations.

Anand also highlighted Carney’s ambitious goal of doubling Canada’s non-U.S. trade within the next decade. Currently, over 75% of Canadian exports are directed to the United States, most of which are covered under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which is set for review in 2026. This situation has prompted Canada to seek diversification in its trading partners.

“This represents a major shift in foreign policy, shaped by a more protectionist global economy,” Anand stated. “We have a new government, a new foreign policy direction, and a new world order emerging.”

Canada Also Rebuilding Ties With China

In addition to its efforts with India, Ottawa is simultaneously working to mend relations with China. Carney and Chinese President Xi Jinping held a constructive meeting at the Asia-Pacific summit last month, indicating progress in repairing long-strained ties between the two nations.

Background on the Nijjar Case

Trade talks with India were suspended in 2023 after Canada publicly accused New Delhi of orchestrating the assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a prominent Sikh leader and Canadian citizen. Nijjar, 45, was shot dead in his truck outside the gurdwara where he served as president in Surrey, British Columbia. Four Indian nationals residing in Canada have since been charged and are awaiting trial.

Relations began to improve in mid-2024 when Carney invited Modi to the G7 summit in Alberta. Diplomatic ties strengthened further when both countries reinstated their high commissioners in August.

“This is a step-by-step journey, and the last six months have seen meaningful progress,” Anand remarked.

Ambitious Trade Goals

Anand stated that both governments aim to double bilateral trade to US$50 billion by 2030. Canada already ranks among India’s largest foreign investors and is India’s seventh-largest trade partner for goods and services.

Canada’s Position on U.S. Trade Relations

Tensions between Canada and the U.S. persist, particularly after Trump halted trade discussions with Carney over an anti-tariff advertisement released by the Ontario government. This disagreement followed months of friction, including Trump’s controversial suggestion that Canada should become the 51st U.S. state—a dispute that has since cooled.

Despite these tensions, Anand stated that Canada is prepared to restart talks with Washington whenever the opportunity arises. “The United States has fundamentally reshaped all of its trade relationships,” she said. “We’re ready to return to the negotiating table.”

Source: Original article

-+=