Category: Politics

Sleepless in Kathmandu: Nepal Struggles for Normalcy After Massacre

Staff ReporterPolitics, Global 0

Mass protests in Nepal led by ‘Gen Z’ youth demanding reform have resulted in violence, police killings, and a regime change, leaving the nation grappling with the aftermath.

In the wake of a tumultuous week in Nepal, the streets of Kathmandu have become a battleground for protests and unrest. Mass demonstrations led by the youth, often referred to as ‘Gen Z,’ have escalated into violence, resulting in police killings, arson, and a significant political upheaval. As the dust begins to settle, the country faces a critical moment of reflection and rebuilding.

The unrest began on September 8, 2025, when a ban on social media sparked widespread protests. The youth, frustrated by the lavish lifestyles of politicians while many Nepalis struggle to make ends meet, took to the streets demanding accountability and reform. The protests, initially intended to be peaceful, quickly turned violent when police opened fire on demonstrators, resulting in multiple fatalities, including students.

In the aftermath, public outrage led to the resignation of the government and the appointment of an interim administration. However, the violence did not cease. Reports of break-ins, assaults, and arson flooded in as mobs targeted government buildings and the homes of former ministers. The chaos resulted in at least 51 deaths, including both protesters and security personnel, with hundreds more injured.

R.C. Gautam, an errand man at Kantipur Television, shared his experience of the violence. The station, which has a long history of covering political unrest, was attacked, with several buildings set ablaze and vehicles destroyed. Gautam described the scene as chaotic and terrifying, noting that he had to seek refuge at a friend’s home due to the curfew and military presence in the city.

As the protests escalated, the initial peaceful intentions of the Gen Z demonstrators were overshadowed by violence. Eyewitness accounts revealed that older individuals in the crowd incited riots, leading to the police’s decision to use lethal force. The fallout from these events has left the city in ruins, with entire neighborhoods engulfed in flames and fear gripping the populace.

In the days following the protests, Kathmandu was marked by destruction. Government buildings, police stations, and the homes of former leaders were set ablaze, leaving a trail of devastation. The air was thick with smoke and the acrid smell of burning, as residents witnessed the chaos unfold around them. Reports of looting and violence spread, with some individuals taking advantage of the turmoil to steal from the very establishments they were protesting against.

The situation became increasingly dire as armed groups roamed the streets, leaving residents feeling vulnerable and unsafe. Many spent sleepless nights in fear, unsure of what the next day would bring. The violence had escalated to a point where even the police were overwhelmed, with reports of officers being attacked and killed by mobs.

As the violence continued, the interim government began to take action. Former Chief Justice Sushila Karki was sworn in as the new Prime Minister, marking a significant shift in leadership. Karki, who was chosen by the Gen Z protesters through social media, now faces the daunting task of restoring order and addressing the grievances that led to the protests in the first place.

In the aftermath of the chaos, the families of those killed during the protests were declared martyrs, and compensation was offered to the bereaved. Efforts to restore the damaged buildings began, but the emotional scars left by the violence will take much longer to heal. En masse cremations were held for the deceased, with grieving families left to grapple with their loss amidst the destruction.

As Nepal attempts to move forward, questions linger about the future. Who orchestrated the violence? What will happen to those who lost their jobs due to the destruction of their workplaces? The answers remain elusive, but for now, the people of Nepal need time to rest and recover.

In a country that has faced numerous challenges, the recent events serve as a stark reminder of the fragility of peace and stability. As the air begins to clear, it is crucial for the nation to reflect on the past and work towards a future that prioritizes accountability, justice, and the well-being of all its citizens.

Source: Original article

Squad Member Responds to Claims of Democratic Celebration of Political Violence

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

Rep. Ilhan Omar denied that Democratic voters are celebrating the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, despite evidence of backlash against those who have mocked his death.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota and member of the progressive group known as “the Squad,” has refuted claims that Democratic voters are celebrating the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. In a recent interview, Omar was confronted with questions regarding the rhetoric surrounding Kirk’s death and whether she believed there was a celebration of political violence among Democratic constituents.

In video footage obtained by Fox News Digital, Omar was asked directly about her concerns regarding the Democratic base’s response to Kirk’s assassination. When pressed on whether Democratic voters were celebrating political violence, Omar responded, “I don’t think anybody is.” This assertion comes despite a growing number of professionals across various sectors facing repercussions for mocking or praising Kirk’s death.

Professionals from K-12 education officials to healthcare workers and political commentators have experienced backlash for their comments regarding Kirk’s assassination. Notably, the law firm Perkins Coie, which is associated with major entities like the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ, has also been implicated in this controversy.

Following Kirk’s assassination, lawmakers from both parties have condemned the rise of political violence. However, contentious moments have still surfaced in Congress. On the day of Kirk’s death, a moment of silence in the House Chamber turned chaotic when Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert of South Carolina requested a spoken prayer in addition to the silent tribute. This request was met with protests from Democratic members, some of whom reportedly shouted about the lack of attention given to a school shooting that occurred on the same day as Kirk’s assassination. In response, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican from Florida, shouted back, “You all caused this.”

When Omar was asked why Democrats did not offer a prayer for Kirk, she stated, “We did a moment of silence; nobody prays on the House floor for anybody who has passed away.” Her comments reflect a broader tension within Congress regarding how to address the implications of political violence.

Omar is currently facing efforts from Republican lawmakers to strip her of her committee assignments, stemming from her comments about Kirk shortly after his assassination. In an interview with the progressive news outlet Zeteo, Omar criticized Kirk’s legacy, stating that he had previously “downplayed slavery and what Black people have gone through in this country by saying Juneteenth shouldn’t exist.”

Omar further elaborated on her views, asserting that many who claim Kirk wanted to engage in civil debate are ignoring the documented history of his words and actions over the past decade. “There are a lot of people who are out there talking about him just wanting to have a civil debate,” she said. “There is nothing more effed up, you know, than to completely pretend that, you know, his words and actions have not been recorded and in existence for the last decade or so.”

In her remarks, Omar also took aim at GOP figures who have criticized Democrats for their rhetoric following Kirk’s assassination. “These people are full of s—,” she stated. “And it’s important for us to call them out while we feel anger and sadness, and have, you know, empathy, which Charlie said, ‘No, it shouldn’t exist,’ because that’s a newly created word or something,” referring to Kirk’s comments about “hate speech.”

The ongoing debate surrounding Kirk’s assassination and the subsequent reactions from both sides of the political spectrum highlight the increasingly polarized nature of American politics. As discussions continue, the implications of political violence remain a pressing concern for lawmakers and citizens alike.

Source: Original article

Cruz Criticizes UN’s Israel ‘Genocide’ Accusation, Calls for Action

Staff ReporterDiplomacy, Politics 0

Texas Senator Ted Cruz condemned a recent U.N. report accusing Israel of genocide, warning of potential sanctions against those involved in the allegations.

Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz has voiced strong criticism of a new United Nations report that accuses Israel of committing genocide in Gaza. He cautioned that the Trump administration and Congress possess the necessary tools to impose sanctions on those responsible for the report.

The report, released on Tuesday by the United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory (COI), asserts that “the State of Israel bears responsibility for the failure to prevent genocide, the commission of genocide, and the failure to punish genocide against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.”

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Cruz remarked, “This latest announcement by the United Nations is no different than any of the other antisemitic smears and libels that have been leveled against Israel in their ongoing response to Hamas’ atrocities on October 7.” He emphasized that this campaign undermines American national security interests by diminishing Israel’s ability to act against Hamas terrorists, who have killed Americans, and by fueling international legal actions against Israel that could also affect American servicemembers and citizens.

Cruz concluded his statement by urging the Republican Trump administration and Congress to utilize the tools and sanctions they have developed to address these threats.

Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and president of Human Rights Voices, also criticized the U.N. report. She described it as promoting genocide against Jews and argued that it rationalizes the crimes against humanity committed by Hamas and other Palestinians on October 7. Bayefsky contended that the report diminishes the severity of the mass murder, rape, torture, and trauma inflicted on Israelis by suggesting that not enough Jews were harmed to pose an “existential threat” to Israel.

Bayefsky pointed out that the COI has been previously accused of omitting critical facts in its reporting and noted that the report fails to make any recommendations for Hamas. She highlighted that the report mentions Hamas’s tunnel network, which played a crucial role in the October 7 attacks, only in the context of criticizing Israel.

Salo Aizenberg, director of the media watchdog group HonestReporting, challenged the COI’s claim that Israel has imposed measures intended to prevent births. He questioned, “If Israel truly aimed to destroy Gaza’s population, why did it allow WHO teams earlier in 2025 to vaccinate 603,000 children under age 10 — matching pre-October 7 numbers?” Aizenberg also pointed out that the report overlooks the fact that over 20,000 fatalities in Gaza are fighters from Hamas and other armed groups, thereby obscuring the true dynamics of the conflict.

The COI report calls for Israel to “ensure full, unimpeded access of humanitarian aid at scale” and to “end the distribution of food aid through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.” It cites the commissioner-general of the controversial U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), who has described the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) as “an abomination” and “a death trap” that is “costing more lives than it saves.”

Recent U.N. statistics indicate that between July 21 and August 18, there were double the number of deaths along U.N. convoy routes (576) compared to those surrounding GHF sites (259). Furthermore, only 14.5% of U.N. aid trucks sent into Gaza have reached their intended destinations since May due to armed looting and theft. During the same period, GHF has managed to distribute 165 million meals to Palestinians at its secure distribution sites.

GHF released a statement asserting that the COI published its report “without ever contacting” the organization, labeling its statements as “falsehoods that could have been easily corrected had we been asked.” The organization emphasized that there have been no shootings at its sites and that claims, particularly those alleging that children have been shot, are “not only false” but also “reckless.”

While the COI currently assigns specific blame to three Israeli officials for alleged genocide, COI member Chris Sidoti stated in a press conference that “there are many, many statements by Israeli political and civilian leaders that incite genocide, and also by others, including some media commentators in Israel, that have been inciting genocide.”

In response to inquiries regarding Sidoti’s remarks, Stéphane Dujarric, spokesperson for U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres, did not clarify whether these comments were directed at Israel’s media. Guterres stated that “it is not in the attributions of the Secretary-General to do the legal determination of genocide. That belongs to the adequate judicial entities, namely, the International Court of Justice.” He added, “the truth is that this is something that it is morally, politically, and legally intolerable.”

Bayefsky remarked that “U.S. law withholds funds for the COI, but clearly it has not had the intended impact.” She argued that it is “high time” to take more significant actions to mitigate the dangers that the U.N. and its COI pose to both the United States and Israel.

Fox News Digital reached out to the State Department to inquire whether it plans to sanction COI members or prevent their travel to the U.N. for the upcoming General Assembly debate, but did not receive a response by press time. A spokesperson for the COI also did not respond to questions regarding its report.

Source: Original article

Trump Travels to UK for Second State Visit, Then to Arizona

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

President Donald Trump is set for a rare second state visit to the UK, followed by a trip to Arizona for the funeral of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

President Donald Trump will embark on a state visit to the United Kingdom this week, marking only his second such visit during his presidency. Following his time in the UK, Trump will travel to Arizona to attend the funeral of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

This return to England is notable, as U.S. presidents typically make only one state visit during their time in office. The significance of this occasion is underscored by both its political and symbolic weight.

During the visit, Trump and First Lady Melania Trump will be hosted by King Charles III and Queen Camilla at Windsor Castle, as Buckingham Palace is currently undergoing renovations. The couple will also meet with Prince William and Princess Catherine of Wales during their stay.

The state visit will begin with a formal welcome, followed by a series of ceremonial events that include a carriage procession, a gun salute, and a military flyover. The festivities will culminate in a lavish state dinner, which typically invites around 150 guests who are chosen based on their cultural, diplomatic, or economic ties to the host nation.

Darren McGrady, a former personal chef to the late Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Diana, emphasized the importance of getting the menu right for such an occasion. McGrady, who served as a royal chef for 15 years and cooked for five U.S. presidents, noted that there is no room for error when it comes to the culinary offerings at a state dinner.

On Thursday, Trump will travel to Chequers, the official country residence of the UK prime minister, where he will meet with Prime Minister Keir Starmer. This meeting will include a series of bilateral discussions, followed by a joint news conference later that day.

Trump, who is 79 years old, and King Charles, aged 76, have known each other for decades, with their relationship dating back to Charles’s visit to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in the late 1980s. More recently, King Charles sent Trump a personal note after Trump survived an assassination attempt during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

After concluding his UK visit, Trump will head to Arizona to attend the funeral of Charlie Kirk, who was tragically assassinated during an outdoor debate at Utah Valley University. Kirk, the charismatic founder of Turning Point USA, was shot on Wednesday, prompting an outpouring of grief and support from his followers.

In the wake of her husband’s death, Kirk’s widow, Erika, expressed her determination to carry on his mission. “To everyone listening tonight across America, the movement my husband built will not die,” she stated in a video message. “I refuse to let that happen. No one will ever forget my husband’s name. And I will make sure of it. It will become stronger. Bolder. Louder and greater than ever,” she affirmed.

Andrew Kolvet, executive producer of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” shared on social media that Turning Point USA has received over 32,000 inquiries from individuals interested in starting new campus chapters in the wake of Kirk’s assassination. In a separate post, Kolvet remarked, “This is the Turning Point.”

Trump’s dual engagements this week highlight significant moments in both international relations and domestic political discourse, reflecting the ongoing impact of influential figures in American conservatism.

Source: Original article

Montana GOP Representative Ryan Zinke Calls Charlie Kirk Assassination ‘Watershed Moment’

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

Montana Congressman Ryan Zinke described the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk as a “watershed moment,” emphasizing the need for civil political discourse without violence.

Rep. Ryan Zinke, a Republican from Montana, characterized the recent assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk as a “watershed moment.” He underscored the importance of maintaining civil political discourse, asserting that Americans should be able to engage in political disagreements without resorting to violence.

Zinke made these remarks during an appearance on NewsNation’s program “The Hill” on Friday. He referenced earlier comments made by Utah Governor Spencer Cox, expressing disappointment that differing political viewpoints have led to violent confrontations.

“We should look and reflect,” Zinke stated. “As the governor pointed out, this is a watershed moment. So, the watershed moment depends on what this country does.” He posed a critical question: “Are we going to continue this? Are we going to continue to not be able to have dialogue and talk to your neighbor?”

Kirk, who was 31 years old and co-founder of Turning Point USA, was shot on the campus of Utah Valley University on Wednesday afternoon. He was transported to a hospital in critical condition but was later pronounced dead. The alleged shooter, identified as 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, turned himself in after a multi-day manhunt, reportedly encouraged by his family.

During a news conference on Friday, Governor Cox called for civility and urged individuals on both sides of the political spectrum to de-escalate tensions and “choose a different path.” He stated, “This is our moment: Do we escalate, or do we find an off-ramp? It’s a choice.”

In an emotional reflection, Cox shared, “For the last 48 hours, I have been as angry as I have ever been, as sad as I have ever been … and as anger pushed me to the brink, it was actually Charlie’s words that pushed me back. Charlie said, ‘When people stop talking, that’s when you get violence.'” This sentiment resonated with Zinke, who similarly called for political dialogue devoid of violence.

Zinke expressed concern over disheartening statements he has observed on social media following recent incidents of political violence. He remarked, “You see, you know, an assassination attempt. You see a political assassination in Minnesota. You see one with Charlie Kirk. You know a father. You know a great patriot, a loving husband. You know, assassinated. And ironically, his assassination was over his message, which was, ‘Let’s have a dialogue. Let’s talk.'”

He further emphasized, “In our country, the strength is that we may agree or disagree, but disagreement should never result in violence.” Zinke also referenced a June incident in which Vance Boelter was charged with the murders of former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman, her husband Mark, and their dog at their Minneapolis home. Boelter was also charged with shooting Minnesota state Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, and for attempting to shoot their daughter, Hope.

Other recent acts of political violence include assassination attempts against former President Donald Trump and the attack on Paul Pelosi, the husband of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, with a hammer in 2022.

Zinke’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding his statements.

Source: Original article

Cool Breeze: Indian-American Community Celebrates Cultural Heritage and Unity

Staff ReporterNation, Politics 0

The launch of “Missing from the House,” a book on Muslim women MPs, sparked discussions on representation and politics, featuring insights from J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and other notable figures.

The recent launch of “Missing from the House,” a book coauthored by Rasheed Kidwai and Ambar Kumar Ghosh, highlighted the underrepresentation of Muslim women in Indian politics. J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah served as the chief guest at the event, where he expressed surprise at the statistics presented: since the first Lok Sabha in 1952, only 18 Muslim women have served as Members of Parliament (MPs).

During his address, Abdullah conveyed skepticism about the potential for increased representation under the current government, pointing out that the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) does not include a single Muslim in its Council of Ministers. His remarks underscored a broader concern regarding the political landscape and the challenges faced by minority communities.

The book launch attracted notable attendees, including Iqra Hasan, Sagarika Ghosh, and Salman Khursheed, who joined Abdullah on stage. Iqra Hasan, a prominent MP from the Samajwadi Party and a graduate of the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London, resonated with the audience when she discussed her decision to wear a headscarf in Parliament. She explained that while she never felt the need to cover her head during her student years, she chose to do so now to shift the focus away from superficial discussions and toward substantive political issues.

Abdullah also tackled the topic of political dynasties, challenging the audience to consider the double standards surrounding the issue. He posed a thought-provoking question: “If anyone else does it, it is halal, but if politicians do it, then it’s haram.” He argued that unlike other professions, politicians are held accountable every five years through elections. “If you don’t like my work, you will cut my ticket,” he added, emphasizing the unique accountability that comes with political office.

His comments struck a chord with the audience, as he highlighted the lack of similar checks in other fields, such as business and entertainment, where dynastic successions are common. The launch of “Missing from the House” not only served as a platform for discussing the representation of Muslim women in politics but also coincided with the impending implementation of the Women’s Reservations Bill, making the conversation even more timely.

In another significant political development, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat both celebrated their 75th birthdays this week, leading to speculation about their future roles. This milestone age is traditionally associated with the Marg Darshak Mandal, a council of elder statesmen within the BJP. However, both leaders have made it clear that they have no intention of stepping down. Instead, they appear to be united in their message that Modi will continue to lead the BJP into the 2029 Lok Sabha elections.

Modi has already made history by addressing the nation from the ramparts of the Red Fort for 12 consecutive years, surpassing Indira Gandhi’s previous record. Such milestones are significant in the realm of politics and contribute to the narrative of leadership continuity.

Meanwhile, in Bihar, the Congress party and the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) are engaged in crucial negotiations over seat-sharing arrangements ahead of the upcoming elections. This foundational aspect of any political alliance has become a focal point, especially as Congress leaders emphasize the need to demonstrate their presence in the state through the ongoing Vote Adhikar Yatra.

In the last Assembly elections in 2020, the Congress was allocated 70 seats while the RJD received 144. The Congress’s performance was disappointing, winning only 19 of its contested seats, whereas the RJD secured 75. However, in the subsequent Lok Sabha elections, the Congress managed to win three seats compared to the RJD’s four, prompting the Congress to approach negotiations with heightened expectations.

One Congress leader noted that the party is not merely seeking a larger number of seats but rather focusing on the quality of the seats they are contesting. There is a sense that the previous allocation did not provide them with winnable options. To add complexity to the negotiations, Rahul Gandhi has yet to endorse Tejashwi Yadav as the alliance’s Chief Ministerial candidate, a move that some view as a strategic bargaining tactic.

Adding to the political intrigue, independent candidate Pappu Yadav recently met with Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge, claiming that the Congress has several potential CM candidates, including Rajesh Ram and Tariq Anwar. However, during a rally in Bihar, Akhilesh Yadav, another alliance partner, publicly endorsed Tejashwi Yadav as the CM face, asserting that Bihar needs a leader like him. Tejashwi himself has embraced this role, referring to himself as the “Original CM” in contrast to Nitish Kumar, whom he labeled a “nakli” (duplicate), suggesting that the BJP is manipulating the political landscape.

Given the RJD’s status as the dominant party and Tejashwi’s position as its chosen leader, it seems likely that he will emerge as the Mahagathbandan’s Chief Ministerial candidate. However, as is often the case in politics, what appears obvious can quickly become complicated.

Source: Original article

S.I.R. Initiative Aims to Strengthen India’s Sovereignty and Security

Staff ReporterElection, Politics 0

Congress leader Pawan Khera’s recent criticisms of the Special Intensive Revision (S.I.R) process in Bihar have sparked a debate about electoral integrity and the preservation of India’s sovereignty.

In a recent attack on the Election Commission of India (ECI), Congress leader Pawan Khera accused the body of undermining the democratic process through its handling of the Special Intensive Revision (S.I.R) in Bihar. Khera claimed that the ECI has been disseminating misleading information, stating that no complaints have been lodged by political parties regarding the S.I.R. He asserted that the Congress Party has submitted 89 lakh complaints about irregularities, only to have these complaints dismissed by the ECI. According to Khera, the ECI informed Congress representatives that only individual complaints would be accepted, not those from political parties.

Khera’s allegations included claims of duplicate entries on the electoral rolls and a demand for the S.I.R to be re-conducted. This rhetoric aligns with a broader strategy employed by the Congress Party, led by Rahul Gandhi, characterized by sensational accusations against the ECI that often lack substantial evidence.

In response to Khera’s assertions, the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) of Bihar provided a detailed rebuttal, addressing each of the Congress leader’s points. The CEO noted that District Congress Committee presidents had submitted letters to District Election Officers alleging the deletion of approximately 89 lakh names from the electoral rolls. However, the ECI clarified that objections to deletions must adhere to specific rules outlined in the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, and the Representation of the People Act, 1950.

The Supreme Court, in an interim order dated August 22, 2025, reinforced that objections from political parties must be submitted in the prescribed format to the relevant Electoral Registration Officer. As the objections submitted by the Congress were not compliant with these requirements, they were forwarded to the appropriate authorities for action.

Regarding allegations of duplicate voters, the Bihar CEO’s office stated that the current draft rolls are still under scrutiny and have not yet been finalized. The ECI highlighted that, unlike the Congress Party, its allies, the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (CPI-ML), had adhered to the rules, with the RJD filing ten claims through valid Booth-Level Agents (BLAs) and the CPI-ML submitting 15 claims for inclusion and 103 objections for exclusion as of August 31, 2025.

This situation underscores a perception that the Congress Party is more focused on making unsubstantiated claims than on addressing electoral integrity in a responsible manner. The party’s objections appear to be more about political maneuvering than genuine concerns for the electoral process.

According to Article 326 of the Indian Constitution, every citizen aged 18 or older is entitled to be registered as a voter. Article 324 establishes the ECI’s authority over the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of elections. The ECI is empowered by Section 21 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, to maintain accurate electoral rolls and make necessary revisions.

A Special Intensive Revision (S.I.R) differs from a summary revision, which updates existing data prior to elections. The S.I.R is intended to create a fresh electoral roll, addressing issues such as duplicate entries that have arisen due to urbanization and migration over the past two decades.

S.Y. Quraishi, a former Chief Election Commissioner, has commented on the controversy surrounding the Bihar S.I.R in various op-eds and television interviews. In an op-ed published on August 20, Quraishi praised the ECI for its efforts but called for greater transparency. He noted that while the ECI has provided detailed information about deletions, it has not disclosed the number of new voters added after this clean-up, which he deemed a significant omission.

Quraishi emphasized that public access to electoral information is crucial for democratic accountability. He argued that for an organization with the ECI’s reputation, a return to full transparency is essential for maintaining public trust in the electoral process.

On September 1, the ECI informed the Supreme Court that it had received 1,532,438 applications for first-time inclusion in the electoral roll from eligible citizens aged 18 and older. Quraishi also raised questions about the necessity of conducting a Special Intensive Revision instead of a Summary Revision, referencing an ECI order from June 24, 2025, which outlined the need for the S.I.R due to significant changes in the electoral landscape.

The S.I.R is fundamentally an exercise in sovereignty, aimed at ensuring that only legitimate citizens are included in the electoral rolls while excluding illegal immigrants. This issue is particularly pressing in regions bordering Bangladesh, such as Assam and West Bengal, and to a lesser extent, Bihar. Areas in Bihar with high Muslim populations have seen significant growth rates, raising concerns about the potential impact of illegal immigration on the electoral process.

During the S.I.R process, districts in Bihar have experienced a surge in applications for residential certificates. Bihar’s Deputy Chief Minister, Samrat Choudhary, expressed concerns that many applicants may be immigrants from neighboring countries, including Bangladesh, Nepal, and Bhutan.

The S.I.R is a process sanctioned by Parliament under the Representation of the People Act, 1950, designed to maintain accurate electoral rolls and ensure that only legitimate Indian citizens participate in elections. Oversight by the Supreme Court further enhances the transparency and compliance of this process. While the S.I.R may have its challenges, it is crucial for safeguarding the integrity of India’s democratic framework.

Efforts by the opposition and certain activists to undermine the S.I.R through unfounded allegations not only threaten the democratic process but may also hint at a more insidious agenda. The question remains whether these actions are an attempt to preserve a vote bank that has been sustained through years of facilitating illegal immigration.

Source: Original article

Netanyahu’s Actions Against Qatar Raise Concerns for Hostages’ Safety

Staff ReporterConflict, Diplomacy, Politics 0

Israel’s recent airstrike in Qatar has drawn widespread condemnation and raised questions about the future of peace negotiations amid ongoing hostilities in Gaza.

In a shocking turn of events, an Israeli airstrike in Qatar has claimed the lives of five senior Hamas leaders who were reportedly discussing ceasefire proposals with U.S. officials. The attack, named Operation Atzeret HaDin, or “Day of Judgement,” occurred while the leaders were meeting in a luxurious residential area in northern Doha.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog stated that the strike specifically targeted Khalil al-Hayya, the primary Hamas negotiator based in Qatar. Herzog claimed that al-Hayya had repeatedly obstructed peace efforts, asserting, “We targeted those who refused to accept the deal, including primarily al-Hayya, whose hands carried the blood of thousands of Israelis.”

However, neutral observers have criticized the strike, suggesting that it was a deliberate attempt by Israel to undermine ongoing peace talks and continue its military campaign in Gaza. Many view the attack as a move to achieve what Israel describes as a “total victory” over Hamas.

Qatar, a key mediator in the region and a U.S. ally, condemned the airstrike as a violation of its sovereignty. Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim al-Thani expressed outrage, stating, “We will act firmly against the reckless breach that threatens our security.” He added that he had met with families of hostages just hours before the attack, emphasizing their reliance on diplomatic mediation for hope.

Other Gulf nations also voiced their condemnation of the Israeli strike. The United Arab Emirates, part of the Abraham Accords aimed at normalizing relations with Israel, labeled the attack a “reckless” and “flagrant violation” of international law. Iran and Saudi Arabia characterized the bombing as a “criminal act,” further escalating regional tensions.

Reports indicate that the discussions among Hamas officials in Doha included proposals for a 60-day ceasefire and the early release of hostages, both living and deceased. The negotiations also considered the release of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails. However, the airstrike abruptly ended these discussions, raising questions about the future of peace efforts.

In the wake of the bombing, President Donald Trump, who had previously expressed optimism about the negotiations, altered his tone. Before the strike, he had posted on Truth Social, “The Israelis have accepted my Terms. It is time for Hamas to accept as well.” After the attack, he expressed dissatisfaction, stating, “I’m not thrilled about it. It’s not a good situation,” while distancing himself from the decision, claiming it was made solely by Prime Minister Netanyahu.

This shift in Trump’s rhetoric has led many to question the reliability of U.S. security guarantees in the region. The bombing poses a complex political dilemma for Trump, who must balance support for Israel with the need to maintain diplomatic relations with Arab nations.

Qatar hosts the largest U.S. military facility in the region, the Al Udeid airbase, which underscores its strategic importance to American interests. This military presence provides Qatar with a degree of security, especially as Israeli officials have long criticized the nation as a “Club Med for terrorism.”

The implications of the airstrike extend beyond immediate diplomatic relations. Analysts warn that the attack could lead to further destabilization in the region, with the potential for a multi-front conflict that could disrupt oil prices and exacerbate humanitarian crises. Recent Israeli strikes on other Middle Eastern capitals, including Tehran and Damascus, have already raised concerns about escalating violence.

Looking ahead, the outcome of Operation Atzeret HaDin remains uncertain. While a major rocket attack on Israel is unlikely in the immediate future, the potential for further Israeli strikes could increase tensions. Observers suggest that restraint from all parties, coupled with strong diplomatic efforts—particularly from the U.S.—could help prevent a broader conflict.

For the families of the hostages, the situation is dire. Netanyahu’s government appears to prioritize a military solution over negotiations, raising fears for the safety of the approximately 20 hostages believed to still be alive. The families are understandably anxious, as Netanyahu’s commitment to securing their release seems increasingly performative. Had he genuinely sought to negotiate, the airstrike on Qatar would not have occurred, effectively jeopardizing any chance for successful mediation.

As the UN General Assembly prepares to meet next week, where several Israeli allies may recognize an independent Palestinian state, the stakes continue to rise. Israel has initiated operations to seize Gaza City, where hostages are believed to be held, further complicating the situation.

In summary, Netanyahu’s recent actions have not only escalated military tensions but have also significantly diminished the prospects for peace, effectively signing the death warrants of innocent hostages who have endured over 700 days in captivity.

Source: Original article

All Mahagatbandhan Parties Must Welcome New Partners in Bihar

Staff ReporterPolitics 0

Congress emphasizes the need for collaboration among alliance partners in Bihar, asserting that the electorate will decide on the new Chief Minister in the upcoming elections.

New Delhi: Congress officials stated on Wednesday that all alliance partners in Bihar must accommodate new members within the coalition. They refrained from endorsing Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav as the Chief Ministerial candidate, asserting that the people of Bihar will choose a new leader in the upcoming elections.

This announcement followed a meeting between the Screening Committee members and senior Bihar Congress leaders. It marked the first gathering of the Screening Committee with the Bihar Congress leadership.

The meeting, held at Indira Bhawan, included key figures such as committee Chairperson Ajay Maken, Bihar in-charge Krishna Allavaru, state unit chief Rajesh Kumar, and CLP leader Shakeel Ahmed Khan.

Sources within the party indicated that around 55 seats were discussed during the meeting. They also revealed that the Congress is actively seeking strong candidates for the forthcoming elections.

During a press conference, Allavaru addressed the seat-sharing formula and the number of seats Congress intends to contest. He stated, “In this election, all alliance partners will have to accommodate new partners in the upcoming polls from their own quota of seats.”

Allavaru emphasized that the presence of several new partners in the Mahagatbandhan necessitates cooperation among all parties. He stressed the importance of dividing seats in a manner that includes both strong and weaker constituencies in each partner’s quota to ensure a robust campaign.

The Congress party has also instructed its block-level organizations to submit names of potential candidates to the state leadership by September 14. A meeting of the state election committee is scheduled for September 16.

Allavaru further noted that the first formal meeting of the Screening Committee will occur on September 19. When questioned about Tejashwi Yadav’s candidacy for Chief Minister, he reiterated that the electorate will ultimately decide on their new leader.

Additionally, party leaders confirmed that a joint manifesto for Bihar will soon be released. A member of the party indicated that the Manifesto Committee was established three months ago and that the joint manifesto is nearing completion. Following its finalization, a collaborative campaign will be launched across all 243 assembly seats in the state.

In the previous assembly elections held in 2020, the Congress contested 70 out of 243 seats and secured 19 victories.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Criticizes UN Vote on Palestinian Statehood

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, USA 0

The United States has condemned a recent U.N. General Assembly resolution supporting Palestinian statehood, labeling it a “gift to Hamas” and counterproductive to peace efforts.

The United States has strongly condemned a U.N. General Assembly resolution that supports the creation of a Palestinian state, which passed with a vote of 142 in favor and 10 against, calling it a “gift to Hamas.” The resolution was backed by a coalition led by Saudi Arabia and France, and it has sparked significant backlash from the Trump administration.

U.S. United Nations Counselor Morgan Ortagus expressed the administration’s disapproval following the vote, stating, “Make no mistake — this resolution is a gift to Hamas.” She emphasized that the United States would not participate in what she described as an “insult to the victims of Oct. 7,” referring to the recent violence in the region. Ortagus further asserted that the resolution undermines diplomatic efforts aimed at achieving peace and securing the release of hostages.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, a White House official reiterated President Trump’s stance, indicating that recognizing a Palestinian state would reward Hamas and hinder efforts to bring hostages home. “He doesn’t think they should be rewarded,” the official stated, reinforcing the administration’s position against the resolution.

The “New York Declaration,” proposed during a U.N. conference in July, aims to outline what its sponsors describe as an “irreversible” path toward Palestinian statehood. The declaration condemns Hamas for the attacks on October 7, demands the release of hostages, and calls for Hamas to relinquish control of Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority.

In Paris, the French Foreign Ministry hailed the resolution’s passage as a “historic vote,” reflecting the international community’s commitment to advancing a comprehensive roadmap for peace and security in the region. The ministry noted that the declaration embodies unprecedented support for principles such as an immediate ceasefire, the release of hostages, and the establishment of a viable, sovereign Palestinian state. It also confirmed that discussions would continue at a follow-up conference in New York on September 22, which will be attended by French President Emmanuel Macron.

Israel’s U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon criticized the vote, labeling it as “theater” and warning that the only beneficiaries would be Hamas. “When terrorists are the ones cheering, you are not advancing peace; you are advancing terror,” he stated, reflecting the concerns of many Israeli officials regarding the implications of the resolution.

Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and president of Human Rights Voices, described the declaration as “a direct threat to American national security” and an “unabashed attempt to destroy the Jewish state.” She expressed particular concern over the provisions related to the so-called right of return, which she argued could lead to a mass influx of Palestinians into Israel, potentially undermining the Jewish majority and self-determination.

Bayefsky criticized the resolution’s provisions regarding Hamas as “smoke and mirrors,” asserting that it undermines the Abraham Accords by restoring a Palestinian veto over regional peace initiatives. She called for a robust response from the United States to counter what she views as a dangerous precedent.

While the U.S. and nine other countries, including Argentina, Hungary, Israel, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, and Tonga, voted against the resolution, Bayefsky expressed disappointment with Germany’s support for the measure, describing it as “absolutely shocking.” She emphasized that undermining the necessity of Jewish self-determination is “abhorrent.”

On the diplomatic front, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced plans to visit Israel ahead of high-level U.N. meetings later this month, where countries such as France and Britain are expected to formally recognize Palestinian statehood. The developments in the U.N. and the international response to the resolution indicate a complex and evolving landscape in the pursuit of peace in the region.

Source: Original article

Lawmakers Respond to Kirk’s Assassination and Political Violence Concerns

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

Following the assassination of Charlie Kirk, lawmakers from both parties are raising alarms about the escalating violence in U.S. political discourse.

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, bipartisan concern has emerged among lawmakers regarding the deteriorating state of political discourse in the United States. The tragic event has intensified discussions about the alarming rise in political violence that has plagued the nation in recent months.

Kirk’s assassination marks a grim chapter in a series of violent incidents targeting high-profile political figures. This trend began in July 2024, when former President Donald Trump was shot while campaigning for a second term in Butler, Pennsylvania. Just months later, Trump faced another assassination attempt. In April, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro was the victim of an arson attack, and in June, two Minnesota lawmakers and their families were attacked, resulting in two fatalities.

The chilling impact of this violence has led some lawmakers to cancel public appearances due to fears for their safety. “We have a climate right now where people who are frankly unhinged… like the two guys who tried to shoot President Trump, one who did shoot him, the person – whoever it is – who killed Charlie, the person who went after the Minnesota lawmakers – these people are nuts,” Senator Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told Fox News Digital. “But they are egged on by a climate that says, ‘Hey, you know, it’s okay basically to go out and shoot your opponents because they’re really Hitler.’”

This sentiment was echoed by Democratic lawmakers, who expressed their own fears about the current political climate. “It’s really sad and just scary, you know, honestly, just how dire things have gotten in this country in terms of our political discourse,” said Senator Andy Kim, D-N.J. He noted a recent survey indicating that over 50% of Americans would label members of the opposing political party as “the enemy,” a notion he described as “terrifying” and “dangerous.”

Senator Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., emphasized the necessity of respectful political engagement, stating that for democracy to function, individuals must be able to “passionately share [their] viewpoints and do so knowing that we resolve our differences through advocacy and voting, not through violence.”

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., remarked on the implications of Kirk’s death for political discourse. “I don’t know what it says about political discourse, but it certainly says something about violence, and it has no business in political discourse. You can have a robust disagreement with people, but when it turns to violence, something’s gone badly wrong,” he said.

Kirk was known for his passionate yet respectful engagement with students across the political spectrum as part of Turning Point USA, the grassroots organization he co-founded in 2012. He frequently visited college campuses nationwide, hosting debates and “Prove Me Wrong” events, where students could challenge his views directly.

Representative Thomas Massie, R-Ky., reflected on the loss of Kirk, stating, “I mean, that’s the shame of this. Charlie Kirk was polite, he had a message, and he spread that message, and he engaged people to speak and debate, and then he lost his life for that. That’s the thing about this country, we have freedom of speech. Nobody should ever take out violence based on something somebody said.”

Representative Jonathan Jackson, D-Ill., urged for a collective reflection on the current political rhetoric, warning that “these violent words precede violent actions.” He emphasized the need for a change in tone to prevent further tragedies.

Hawley suggested a broader perspective might help mitigate the issue. “I’ll just say again, part of the way we stop it is we realize that there’s stuff in life that’s more important than politics,” he advised reporters.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has sparked urgent discussions among lawmakers about the need to address the rising tide of political violence and the rhetoric that fuels it. As the nation grapples with these issues, the hope remains that a return to civil discourse can be achieved.

Source: Original article

Relative of 9/11 Firefighter Criticizes Mamdani for Slogan Silence

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

The cousin of a 9/11 firefighter criticized New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani for not condemning the slogan “globalize the intifada” during a recent anniversary ceremony.

The cousin of a firefighter who perished in the September 11 attacks took aim at New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani for his reluctance to denounce the controversial slogan “globalize the intifada.” This remark came during a memorial ceremony held in Manhattan on Thursday, where Mike Weinstein, 61, honored his cousin, Stephen Belson, a veteran firefighter who lost his life while attempting to rescue individuals trapped in the South Tower of the World Trade Center.

Weinstein urged all politicians to unequivocally renounce terror and violence. He warned that failing to do so, particularly by not condemning phrases like “globalize the intifada,” could lead to another tragedy akin to 9/11. “I know my cousin Steve and many, many others would agree with me when I say, let’s continue to press all politicians, including those who went home already, to firmly renounce terror and violence,” Weinstein stated. “When political candidates and public officials refuse to condemn global terror and phrases such as ‘globalize the intifada,’ they are inviting another 9/11, God forbid, and they continue to bring daily fear for all New Yorkers,” he added.

Weinstein’s passionate remarks underscored the urgency he feels regarding the political climate. “Enough. Enough is enough,” he continued. “Twenty-four years later, we need all political candidates, including every single potential future mayor — and you know who I’m talking about — of this great city to speak out against terror and unite as freedom-loving New Yorkers. God bless America, land of the free and home of the brave.”

The phrase “globalize the intifada” is widely recognized as an anti-Zionist slogan that advocates for international support of Palestinian resistance against Israel. However, it has been criticized for inciting violence against Israelis and Jews. Throughout his campaign for the Democratic Party’s mayoral nomination, which he won in June, Mamdani has refrained from directly condemning the slogan. Recently, he did indicate that he would “discourage” its use.

In a shift from his earlier stance, Mamdani suggested that discussions with Jewish leaders had influenced his perspective on the slogan’s implications. He acknowledged the disparity between the slogan’s intended message and its detrimental effects on many Jewish New Yorkers. Earlier this summer, Mamdani described the phrase as reflecting “a desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights.” However, he later clarified that it is “not language that I use,” amid growing backlash.

During an appearance on NBC, Mamdani emphasized the importance of using language that clearly conveys his intentions, stating, “The language that I use and the language that I will continue to use to lead this city is that which speaks clearly to my intent, which is an intent grounded in a belief in universal human rights.”

As the political landscape evolves, the discourse surrounding sensitive topics like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains contentious. Weinstein’s remarks serve as a reminder of the deep emotional scars left by the events of 9/11 and the ongoing challenges faced by New Yorkers in navigating these complex issues.

Source: Original article

Railways Use Parcel Vans to Transport Kashmir Fruits During Highway Disruptions

Staff ReporterBusiness, Nation, Politics 0

Indian Railways has introduced parcel vans to transport Kashmir’s fruits to Jammu and Delhi, providing crucial support to growers amid disruptions on the Srinagar-Jammu National Highway.

In a significant development for fruit growers in the Kashmir Valley, Indian Railways has deployed two dedicated parcel vans to facilitate the transport of fresh produce to Jammu and Delhi. This initiative comes at a critical time when the region’s horticulture sector is grappling with substantial losses due to the ongoing closure of the Srinagar-Jammu National Highway (NH-44), which has been affected by landslides and persistent rains.

Railway officials confirmed that the two vans departed from Budgam Railway Station on Thursday morning. One van is destined for Delhi, while the other is headed to Jammu, both carrying substantial consignments of the Valley’s renowned apples.

“This initiative is aimed at ensuring that the produce of local growers doesn’t go to waste,” said a senior railway official at Budgam. “It’s a significant step to support the horticulture economy of Kashmir during this critical time.”

For the past two weeks, fruit-laden trucks have faced severe challenges, with many stuck or forced to turn back due to road blockages. This situation has left traders and farmers distressed, as thousands of tonnes of perishable fruit risked spoiling without viable transport options.

Local fruit growers have welcomed the railway’s initiative and expressed hope that such services could become a permanent feature during harvest seasons. “This has given us hope,” remarked a grower from Shopian. “Rail transport is faster and more dependable, especially when the highway gets blocked.”

Officials indicated that if this initiative proves successful both logistically and economically, there may be plans to expand parcel services to additional destinations, potentially including major cities like Mumbai and Kolkata.

The introduction of rail transport for fruit exports is being viewed as a game-changer for Kashmir’s horticulture sector, which plays a vital role in the Union Territory’s economy. By providing an alternative to the frequently closed highway, the rail service could become a lifeline for fruit exports in upcoming seasons.

Source: Original article

U.S. Media Express Optimism as Modi and Trump Address Trade Tensions

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

The U.S. media expressed optimism on September 10 regarding the positive exchange of messages between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump, signaling potential resolution of trade tensions.

On September 10, the U.S. media reacted positively to the exchange of messages between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump, indicating a hopeful outlook for resolving ongoing trade issues, particularly concerning tariffs and trade barriers.

Fox Business reported on the resumption of trade talks, highlighting a “significant shift” in U.S.-India relations after months of heightened tensions. The article noted that the exchange of messages underscores both countries’ commitment to advancing negotiations, although it acknowledged that unresolved disputes in agriculture and energy continue to pose challenges.

In a similar vein, Bloomberg published an editorial titled “Don’t Let Tariffs Tank the US-India Relationship,” urging both nations to focus on their long-term interests. The piece emphasized the importance of maintaining strong ties with India, which it described as the world’s largest democracy and a vital partner in a critical region.

The editorial advised the Trump administration to continue supporting India, particularly in light of its strategic role within the “Quad” diplomatic group, which includes Japan and Australia. It argued that India can significantly contribute to diversifying supply chains, advancing technology, and upholding a rules-based international order in the face of pressures from China.

Bloomberg’s editorial cautioned against allowing trade disputes to undermine a carefully cultivated relationship. It noted that neither China nor Russia could provide the same level of investment, technology transfers, or access to advanced weaponry that the United States can offer. The article urged India to focus on preserving and enhancing its relationship with the U.S. through cooperation in areas such as semiconductors, quantum technology, and defense production, regardless of the status of trade negotiations.

While the editorial expressed hope for a resolution, it also acknowledged the unpredictable nature of political dynamics in Washington, stating that there is “no guarantee” of a deal. Nonetheless, it maintained that a successful resolution could yield significant benefits over time.

As both nations navigate these complex issues, the recent exchanges signal a mutual desire to improve relations and foster cooperation in various sectors, highlighting the importance of dialogue in addressing trade tensions.

Source: Original article

Land Seized in Baramulla Linked to Terrorism in PoK

Staff ReporterConflict, Nation, Politics 0

Baramulla Police have seized land belonging to two individuals linked to terrorism in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, aiming to disrupt anti-national networks in the region.

Srinagar: In a significant operation against anti-national elements, the Baramulla Police executed property attachments of two proclaimed offenders involved in unlawful activities. This action was carried out under the directives of the Hon’ble Special Court designated under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

The operation pertains to case FIR No. 03/2008, registered at Police Station Pattan. This case involves serious charges under Sections 2 and 3 of the Enemy Agents Ordinance (EIMCO) Act, Section 121 of the Ranbir Penal Code (RPC), and Section 19 of the UAPA. The court order authorizing the attachment proceedings is numbered 122/ASJ/BLA/UAPA and is dated September 2, 2025.

The properties attached include land belonging to two individuals currently residing in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The first individual, Mohd Maqbool Sheikh, son of Late Ali Mohd Sheikh, has land measuring 03 Kanals 15 Marlas under Survey No. 1947/1767. The second individual, Mohd Rafiq Tantray, son of Ab Hamid Tantray, has land measuring 04 Kanals 17 Marlas under Survey Nos. 1763/1584/2395.

This attachment was executed under Section 88 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) with the active assistance of the Revenue Department. The properties were thoroughly identified and demarcated, and all necessary legal formalities, including public notification and proclamation, were completed.

This action underscores the Baramulla Police’s commitment to dismantling the terror ecosystem in the region. Authorities have indicated that the process of identifying and attaching properties belonging to individuals involved in unlawful and anti-national activities will continue in accordance with the law.

In a related development, the Baramulla Police recently dismantled a terrorist hideout in the Gogaldara-Danwas forest area, seizing a cache of arms and ammunition. These concerted efforts reflect the ongoing commitment of the Jammu and Kashmir Police to uphold peace, security, and the rule of law in the region.

Source: Original article

Congress Reacts to CRPF Letter on Security Breaches Amid Vote Theft Allegations

Staff ReporterPolitics 0

Congress has condemned a letter from the CRPF regarding security protocol breaches involving Rahul Gandhi, questioning whether the government is unsettled by his allegations of vote theft.

New Delhi: The Congress party has reacted strongly to a letter from the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) addressed to its President, Mallikarjun Kharge, which highlighted repeated lapses in security protocol during Rahul Gandhi’s foreign trips. The letter warned that such breaches could expose Gandhi to serious risks. In response, Congress has suggested that the government may be rattled by Gandhi’s recent allegations of vote theft.

The CRPF’s communication, which was made public, raised concerns about “unscheduled trips” and violations of security protocols by Gandhi. Sources indicate that the letter specifically addressed security practices related to the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha.

According to the CRPF, despite being under Z+ security cover with an Advance Security Liaison (ASL) team, Rahul Gandhi has neglected mandatory protective measures on multiple occasions. Sunil June, the Chief of VVIP Security for the CRPF, alleged that Gandhi was not taking his security seriously, often traveling abroad without prior notification.

The letter detailed at least six foreign trips made by Gandhi to countries including Italy, Vietnam, Dubai, Qatar, London, and Malaysia. It emphasized that high-security protectees are required to inform their security teams in advance about all movements, including international travel, to ensure adequate security arrangements are in place, as outlined in the “Yellow Book” protocol.

In a pointed response, Pawan Khera, chairperson of the Congress media and publicity department, questioned the timing of the letter’s release, suggesting it was an attempt to intimidate Gandhi. He noted that the letter’s public disclosure coincided with Gandhi’s efforts to expose alleged vote theft by the BJP, which he claims is facilitated by the Election Commission.

Khera expressed his concerns on social media platform X, stating, “The timing of the CRPF’s letter and its instant public release raise disturbing questions. It comes just as Rahul Gandhi is leading the charge against the BJP’s Vote Chori carried out with the Election Commission’s complicity.”

He further challenged the government, asking, “Is this a veiled attempt to intimidate the Leader of Opposition, who has already announced another imminent disclosure? Is the government rattled by the truth he is about to reveal?”

In recent months, Gandhi has traveled to several countries while simultaneously targeting the government over alleged electoral misconduct, asserting that the Election Commission has colluded with the BJP in what he describes as vote theft.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the Congress party remains steadfast in its criticism of the government’s actions, framing the CRPF’s letter as part of a broader strategy to undermine opposition voices.

Source: Original article

Rubio Cautions Brazil on U.S. Response Following Bolsonaro’s Coup Conviction

Staff ReporterElection, Politics 0

The U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has warned of a potential U.S. response following the conviction of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro for plotting a coup.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced on Thursday that the United States would take action in response to the conviction of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who was found guilty of plotting a coup to retain power after losing the 2022 election. While Rubio did not specify the nature of the U.S. response, he expressed strong disapproval of the Brazilian judicial proceedings against Bolsonaro.

In a post on X, Rubio criticized what he described as “political persecutions” by Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, labeling the ruling against Bolsonaro as unjust. “The United States will respond accordingly to this witch hunt,” he stated, indicating that the U.S. government would not remain passive in the face of what he perceives as a violation of democratic principles.

Brazil’s Foreign Ministry reacted sharply to Rubio’s comments, asserting that they constituted a threat to Brazilian sovereignty and disregarded the facts surrounding the case. The ministry emphasized that Brazilian democracy would not be intimidated by external pressures.

On Thursday, Bolsonaro was sentenced to 27 years and three months in prison after being convicted by Brazil’s Supreme Court. The charges against him included plotting a coup to prevent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva from assuming office in January 2023. Bolsonaro, who served as president from 2019 to 2022, was a close ally of former U.S. President Donald Trump.

Trump, commenting on the situation, expressed surprise at Bolsonaro’s conviction, likening it to his own legal challenges. “I thought he was a good president of Brazil,” Trump said, adding that he was taken aback by the developments. He also criticized the Brazilian judicial system, suggesting that it was politically motivated.

In response to the ongoing situation, Rubio has previously announced visa revocations for Justice de Moraes and his associates. This action followed the issuance of search warrants and restraining orders against Bolsonaro, which Rubio characterized as part of a “political witch hunt.” The U.S. Treasury Department has also sanctioned de Moraes, citing allegations of arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppression of free speech.

Eduardo Bolsonaro, the former president’s son and a Brazilian Congressman, indicated that he expects further U.S. sanctions against Brazilian justices involved in the case. He warned that justices who voted to convict his father could face repercussions under the Magnitsky Act, a law previously utilized by the Trump administration against de Moraes. “If these Supreme Court justices keep following Moraes, they also run the risk of facing the same sanction,” he stated.

The situation continues to evolve, with both U.S. and Brazilian officials closely monitoring the implications of Bolsonaro’s conviction and the potential for increased tensions between the two nations.

Source: Original article

Democratic Senator Defends Against Accusations of Using Veterans as Props

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia faces accusations from Republicans regarding his claims about a veterans housing bill, which he defends as a celebration of bipartisan efforts to assist veterans.

Senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat from Georgia, has dismissed Republican accusations that he misrepresented his involvement in the passage of a veterans housing bill. He questioned, “Is this the best they’ve got?” in response to the criticism.

The controversy centers around claims that Ossoff exaggerated his role in helping to pass legislation designed to prevent veterans from losing their homes. Some local media outlets inaccurately reported that Ossoff co-sponsored the bill, despite his lack of formal involvement.

Ossoff shared a video on social media last week featuring a news report that documented his press conference alongside local leaders and veterans groups. This event occurred shortly after President Donald Trump signed the VA Home Loan Program Reform Act. In the video caption, Ossoff stated that he “championed” the bipartisan bill aimed at protecting veterans.

However, a Fox News analysis revealed that Ossoff was not a co-sponsor of the legislation and did not vote on it. The bill was passed by unanimous consent in the House and through a voice vote in the Senate. Furthermore, Ossoff did not introduce any companion legislation in the Senate, nor was he present or active during the Senate floor discussions in July, according to a GOP source.

Republicans have criticized Ossoff’s messaging, arguing that he had “absolutely nothing” to do with the bill. When asked to clarify the discrepancies regarding his claims, Ossoff’s team defended his statements, asserting that he was merely celebrating the passage of a bipartisan bill that addressed a problem created by Republicans.

A spokesperson for Ossoff stated, “The Trump administration canceled the VASP program, and Sen. Ossoff sounded the alarm that its cancellation risked veteran homelessness, then celebrated the passage of a bipartisan bill to solve the problem. This is the best they’ve got?”

The VA Home Loan Reform Act is intended to replace the Veterans Affairs Servicing Purchase (VASP) program, which Ossoff previously criticized the Trump administration for terminating. Rep. Derrick Van Orden, a Republican from Wisconsin and the lead sponsor of the VA Home Loan Reform Act, described the VASP program as “fiscally irresponsible” and stated it was “endangering the entire VA home loan guarantee program.”

After Van Orden highlighted Ossoff’s social media posts claiming he “championed” the new veteran foreclosure bill, he accused the senator of telling a “bald-faced lie.” Other Republicans joined in the criticism, attacking Ossoff on social media platforms.

Rep. Buddy Carter, a Republican from Georgia, referred to Ossoff’s statements as “pathetic, disgusting lies,” suggesting that the senator was using veterans as props for political gain. He stated, “Congrats on showing Georgians you’re not above using veterans as props for your press stunts. Your empty suit gimmicks spit in the face of people you claim to serve.”

Senator Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, echoed similar sentiments, asserting that Ossoff had no involvement in the Republican-led efforts to assist veterans. He criticized Ossoff for attempting to take credit amid what he described as political desperation, stating, “Georgia deserves so much better.”

Van Orden reiterated that Ossoff had no role in the bill, emphasizing, “He did not even vote for it; it passed by unanimous consent. This disgusting and shameful behavior must stop. Veterans are not political props.”

The controversy surrounding Ossoff’s claims has led to multiple local news outlets reporting inaccuracies regarding his role in the Veterans Affairs legislation. For instance, WSB Radio in Atlanta published an article stating that a new law co-sponsored by Ossoff aimed to prevent veteran foreclosures. However, according to official records, Van Orden was the bill’s sole sponsor.

The bill was forwarded to the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee for approval before being passed by a voice vote in the Senate, where Ossoff is not a member.

Ossoff’s team announced that President Trump signed the Veterans Affairs Home Loan Program Reform Act into law on a Wednesday, describing it as bipartisan legislation that Ossoff co-sponsored and supported to assist veterans relying on VA loans. This assertion has been challenged by critics who argue that Ossoff’s claims are misleading.

As Ossoff prepares for his 2026 re-election campaign, he faces a competitive Republican field, including Derek Dooley, a former University of Tennessee football coach and ally of Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, as well as Republican Representatives Mike Collins and Buddy Carter.

As the political landscape evolves, the scrutiny surrounding Ossoff’s claims highlights the contentious nature of political discourse, particularly regarding issues affecting veterans.

Source: Original article

Farooq Abdullah Criticizes LG Administration for Mehraj Malik’s Detention

Staff ReporterPolitics 0

Protests erupt in Jammu and Kashmir over the detention of AAP leader Mehraj Malik, prompting National Conference leader Farooq Abdullah to criticize the LG administration’s actions.

SRINAGAR: Protests have erupted across various regions of Jammu and Kashmir in response to the detention of Mehraj Malik, the President of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in the Union Territory and a sitting Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA). Senior National Conference leader and former Chief Minister Dr. Farooq Abdullah addressed the situation on Wednesday during a visit to Baramulla.

Dr. Abdullah placed the blame squarely on the administration led by the Lieutenant Governor (LG), stating, “The police and administration are under the LG. Whatever happens there, the LG will be responsible for it.” His comments come amid escalating outrage over Malik’s detention under the Public Safety Act (PSA), a move that has drawn widespread criticism from various political factions and civil society organizations.

Following the execution of the PSA order, protests broke out in Doda and Bhaderwah, with Malik’s supporters asserting that the detention is politically motivated and intended to stifle dissent. Dr. Abdullah emphasized that such actions would not contribute to the progress of the Union Territory. “If they think jailing elected representatives will silence the voices of people, they are mistaken. Democracy is about dialogue, not suppression,” he remarked.

The former Chief Minister also called for restraint from the administration, urging a reconsideration of its approach. “This is not how you build peace. Detaining leaders without proper justification will only widen the trust deficit,” he warned.

In response to Malik’s detention, his family and party colleagues have approached the court to challenge the PSA order. The political atmosphere in the region remains tense, with multiple parties demanding Malik’s immediate release.

As the situation develops, attention is focused on the LG administration and its potential response to the mounting political pressure.

Source: Original article

World Leaders Mourn Charlie Kirk Following Shocking Assassination in Utah

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

World leaders condemned political violence following the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk, a conservative media figure, during a speaking engagement at Utah Valley University.

International leaders expressed their outrage and sorrow on Wednesday after the tragic news broke that Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative media personality and co-founder of Turning Point USA, was shot and killed during a speaking event at Utah Valley University. Kirk, 31, was a husband and father of two.

Former President Donald Trump confirmed Kirk’s death in a social media post, revealing that he had been hospitalized after suffering a neck wound from the shooting.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was among the first world leaders to voice his grief over Kirk’s assassination. He stated on social media, “Charlie Kirk was murdered for speaking truth and defending freedom.” Netanyahu described Kirk as a “lion-hearted friend of Israel” who fought against falsehoods and stood firm for Judeo-Christian values. He noted that he had spoken with Kirk just two weeks prior and had invited him to Israel, lamenting that “sadly, that visit will not take place.” He concluded his tribute by acknowledging Kirk’s profound pride in America and his unwavering belief in free speech, stating, “Rest in peace, Charlie Kirk.”

Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni also expressed her condolences, stating on X that she was “shocked by the news of the killing of Charlie Kirk.” She characterized the act as “an atrocious murder, a deep wound for democracy and for those who believe in freedom.” Meloni extended her sympathies to Kirk’s family, loved ones, and the American conservative community.

Argentina’s President Javier Milei shared a personal photo with Kirk and former Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, offering condolences to Kirk’s family and to the young people worldwide who admired him. He called Kirk “a formidable disseminator of the ideas of freedom and staunch defender of the West,” labeling him a “victim of an atrocious murder” and attributing blame to the “left,” despite law enforcement officials not confirming the identity of the shooter. “The entire world lost an incredible human being,” Milei added.

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer also expressed his sorrow and condemned political violence in a post on X, stating, “My thoughts this evening are with the loved ones of Charlie Kirk.” He emphasized the heartbreak of a young family being robbed of a father and husband, asserting that “we must all be free to debate openly and freely without fear – there can be no justification for political violence.”

Numerous leaders across the U.K. echoed Starmer’s sentiments, including Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, who shared a photo with Kirk and remarked, “This is a very dark day for American democracy.” He expressed his deep sadness for Kirk, his wife, and children.

New Zealand’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Winston Peters, also condemned the rise of political violence and its threat to democracy. He stated on X, “It is tragic that we now live in a world where differences of opinion are met with a gun,” emphasizing that Kirk’s death should not merely be classified as “political violence” but rather as “an assassination.” Peters lamented the loss, noting that Kirk had traveled extensively to university campuses to provide open forums for debate, where all voices were welcomed. He warned that “the essence of democracy is under threat around the world and we must do everything we can to protect it.”

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has sparked a global conversation about the dangers of political violence and the importance of safeguarding democratic discourse.

Source: Original article

Trump Opponents Claim SCOTUS Ruling Promotes ‘Racial Terror’ in ICE Raids

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

California Democrats condemned a Supreme Court ruling that allows Trump administration immigration raids in Los Angeles, labeling it “un-American” and a potential source of “racial terror.”

California Democrats have expressed strong opposition to a recent Supreme Court ruling that permits the Trump administration to continue its immigration raids in Los Angeles. They characterized the decision as “un-American” and warned that it could lead to a “parade of racial terror.”

Governor Gavin Newsom, a vocal critic of President Donald Trump, took to X (formerly Twitter) to voice his disapproval. He stated, “Trump’s hand-picked SCOTUS majority just became the Grand Marshal for a parade of racial terror in LA. His administration is targeting Latinos — and anyone who doesn’t look or sound like his idea of an American — to deliberately harm our families and economy.”

The Supreme Court’s ruling, which passed with a 6-3 vote, allows the Trump administration to resume immigration raids in California, overturning a lower court’s decision that had previously halted such actions. This case was escalated to the Supreme Court after a federal judge ruled in July that the raids were likely unconstitutional, as they involved detaining individuals based on “apparent race or ethnicity” or their ability to speak Spanish. Immigration advocates have long accused the federal government of targeting Latinos based on these criteria.

In addition to Newsom, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Senator Adam Schiff also criticized the Supreme Court’s decision. They described the immigration raids as “blatantly illegal.” Schiff remarked, “This Administration rounded up and arrested California residents, including U.S. citizens and legal residents, based on the color of their skin or the language they speak. This is blatantly illegal, yet the Supreme Court is allowing it to happen while the case proceeds.” Schiff has a history of contentious interactions with Trump, which include disputes over the January 6 investigation and Trump’s impeachment trials.

Mayor Bass echoed these sentiments, stating, “I want the entire nation to hear me when I say this isn’t just an attack on the people of LA; this is an attack on every person in every city in this country. Today’s ruling is not only dangerous – it’s un-American and threatens the fabric of personal freedom in the U.S.” She emphasized her commitment to fighting for the rights and dignity of Angelenos, despite the administration’s efforts to undermine them.

The Supreme Court’s majority did not provide an explanation for their ruling. However, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a concurring opinion, argued that race could be a relevant factor in determining reasonable suspicion for immigration stops. He stated, “To be clear, apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion; under this Court’s case law regarding immigration stops, however, it can be a ‘relevant factor’ when considered along with other salient factors.”

Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, expressing concern over the emergency order that approved such raids. She stated, “We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low wage job.”

The Trump administration welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision, with Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin declaring it a “win for the safety of Californians and the rule of law.” She added, “DHS law enforcement will not be slowed down and will continue to arrest and remove the murderers, rapists, gang members, and other criminal illegal aliens.”

This ruling follows the Trump administration’s directive for immigration officials to carry out raids in Los Angeles, a city that has identified itself as a “sanctuary” for undocumented immigrants. Protests and riots erupted in response to the crackdown, with local leaders like Newsom and Bass condemning the administration’s actions and offering support to undocumented individuals.

As the situation develops, the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling remain a focal point of contention among California Democrats and immigration advocates, who fear that the decision could exacerbate racial profiling and discrimination in immigration enforcement.

Source: Original article

VP Polls: A Battle for Ideologies and Parliamentary Traditions

Staff ReporterElection, Politics 0

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge emphasized that the recent vice presidential election was a significant ideological battle, underscoring the need to protect democracy and the Constitution.

New Delhi: In the wake of the recent vice presidential election, where Opposition candidate Justice B. Sudershan Reddy was defeated by NDA’s CP Radhakrishnan, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge extended his congratulations to Radhakrishnan while highlighting the deeper significance of the election.

Kharge described the contest as more than just a political race, framing it as a battle of ideologies. He asserted that it is crucial to check governments with authoritarian tendencies to safeguard the Constitution and democracy. In a post on X, Kharge stated, “Best wishes to CP Radhakrishnan on securing victory in the Vice Presidential election. We extend our sincere gratitude to B. Sudershan Reddy garu, the united Opposition’s joint candidate, for his spirited and principled fight. This was more than an election; it was a battle of ideology, reaffirming that governments with authoritarian tendencies must be checked to protect our Constitution and Democracy.”

Kharge expressed hope that the newly elected Vice President would uphold the highest standards of parliamentary traditions, ensuring that the Opposition is afforded equal space and dignity, and would resist any pressures from the ruling government.

He emphasized the importance of revitalizing the Vice Presidency, which he described as the second highest Constitutional office, to reflect independence, fairness, and strength in upholding democratic values. “The Vice President must safeguard democratic values,” he remarked, underscoring the need for the office to be a bastion of impartiality.

Kharge also reminded observers of the circumstances that led to this election, noting that the resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar on July 21 was sudden and unceremonious, leaving many questions unanswered. “As we move forward, transparency, accountability, and respect for Constitutional positions must guide our institutions in letter and spirit,” he stated.

Justice B. Sudershan Reddy, the joint candidate of the Opposition, garnered 300 votes, while Radhakrishnan received 452 votes in the election. Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh echoed Kharge’s sentiments in a post on X, stating, “The Opposition stood united for the Vice Presidential election.”

Ramesh highlighted the performance of the Opposition candidate, noting that Reddy’s achievement of securing 40 percent of the vote was a significant improvement compared to the 26 percent received by the Opposition in the 2022 Vice Presidential elections. “The BJP’s arithmetical victory is really both a moral and political defeat. The ideological battle continues undiminished,” he added.

On the day of the election, which took place from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., prominent leaders including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Kharge, Congress Parliamentary Party Chairperson Sonia Gandhi, and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi cast their votes.

The election for the vice presidential post was necessitated following Jagdeep Dhankhar’s unexpected resignation, which he attributed to medical reasons.

Source: Original article

Ideological Battle Intensifies Following Vice Presidential Election Results

Staff ReporterElection, Nation India, Politics 0

Opposition vice presidential candidate B Sudershan Reddy accepted the election outcome, emphasizing the ongoing ideological struggle for constitutional values and justice in India.

New Delhi: Opposition vice presidential candidate B Sudershan Reddy accepted the verdict of the Members of Parliament (MPs) on Tuesday, expressing humility regarding the election results. He described his candidacy as a profound honor, allowing him to advocate for the principles of constitutional morality, justice, and individual dignity.

Despite the unfavorable outcome, Reddy asserted that the larger cause pursued by the opposition remains strong. He stated, “The ideological battle continues with ever greater vigour.” His remarks came after the election for the Vice President of India, in which he was supported by Congress-led opposition parties.

In a statement, Reddy, a retired Supreme Court justice, acknowledged the democratic process, saying, “Today, the MPs have rendered their verdict in the election for the office of the Vice President of India. I humbly accept this outcome with an abiding faith in the democratic processes of our great Republic.”

Reddy expressed gratitude to the opposition leaders who chose him as their joint candidate. He emphasized that democracy is not solely about victory but also about the spirit of dialogue, dissent, and participation. “I remain committed, as a citizen, to upholding the ideals of equality, fraternity, and liberty that bind us together. May our Constitution continue to be the guiding light of our national life,” he said.

He also extended his best wishes to Vice President-elect CP Radhakrishnan as he begins his term in office.

The vice presidential elections took place on Tuesday, with a total of 768 out of 781 votes cast. Radhakrishnan received 452 votes, while Reddy garnered 300 votes. The election was necessitated by the unexpected resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar on July 21, citing medical grounds.

Reddy’s acceptance of the election results reflects a commitment to the ongoing ideological struggle within Indian politics, highlighting the importance of democratic values and the collective efforts of opposition parties.

Source: Original article

Congress President Kharge Meets Bihar Leaders to Discuss Poll Strategy

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi met with Bihar leaders to strategize for upcoming assembly polls, focusing on seat sharing and campaign preparations.

New Delhi: Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, accompanied by Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, convened a meeting with Bihar leaders on Tuesday to discuss preparations for the upcoming assembly elections in the state.

This meeting follows the recent conclusion of the Voter Adhikar Yatra, led by Rahul Gandhi, which the party claims has revitalized its workers and cadres across Bihar.

Chaired by Kharge, the meeting included prominent figures such as Screening Committee Chairman Ajay Maken, KC Venugopal, Bihar in-charge Krishna Allavaru, state unit chief Rajesh Kumar, and several party MPs, including Tariq Anwar, Mohammad Javed, Akhilesh Prasad Singh, Manoj Kumar, Ranjeet Ranjan, and CLP Mohammad Shekeel Ahmed Khan. NSUI in-charge Kanhaiya Kumar, Madan Mohan Jha, and Pappu Yadav were also in attendance.

Lasting over an hour, the discussions encompassed various topics, including seat sharing, the party’s electoral preparedness, and other pertinent issues.

Following the meeting, Allavaru addressed the media, stating that multiple issues were deliberated upon. He highlighted that discussions included seat sharing, the manifesto, and the campaign committee. Additionally, he mentioned that a future strategy had been established during the meeting.

A Congress source indicated that the party aims to maintain momentum in Bihar, with several programs featuring Rahul Gandhi and other senior leaders planned to commence from September 20. The source also noted that discussions regarding seat sharing would continue with alliance partners in the state, as Congress seeks to secure respectable seats, given the party’s historical significance in the region.

During his 16-day Voter Adhikar Yatra, Rahul Gandhi visited over 25 districts in Bihar, engaging with local communities and addressing key issues.

The polling for the 243-member assembly is scheduled for later this year. The ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA), comprising the BJP, JDU, HAM-S, and LJPR, is aiming to retain power, while the Mahagatbandhan, led by the RJD, Congress, VIP, and Left parties, is working to reclaim control.

During Rahul Gandhi’s yatra in Bihar, the Mahagatbandhan raised concerns regarding voter theft, highlighting the ongoing electoral challenges in the state.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Agenda and DOGE Cuts Impact Virginia Special Election

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

President Donald Trump’s policies, particularly job cuts and social issues, are central to the Virginia special election to fill a vacant House seat, with candidates debating their impacts on local voters.

In a special congressional election taking place in northern Virginia, President Donald Trump is a significant presence, despite not being on the ballot. The election, scheduled for Tuesday, will fill the seat left vacant by the late Democratic Representative Gerry Connolly, who passed away in June after a battle with cancer.

The race is primarily between Democratic nominee James Walkinshaw and Republican nominee Stewart Whitson. Key issues dominating the campaign include job cuts implemented by Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), crime and immigration policies, transgender rights, and calls for the release of Justice Department files related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Walkinshaw, who serves on the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors and previously worked as Connolly’s chief of staff, argues that Trump’s controversial agenda will significantly influence the election outcome in Virginia’s left-leaning 11th Congressional District. He stated that many voters in the area have been directly affected by the job cuts and layoffs associated with DOGE.

“Folks in Northern Virginia and Fairfax are feeling the impact of the Trump policies,” Walkinshaw said on the eve of the election. “Everybody in Fairfax knows someone who has lost their job because of DOGE or the Trump policies.” He emphasized that the district is experiencing the effects of these policies firsthand, which he believes will resonate with voters.

Whitson, an Army veteran and former FBI special agent, counters that Walkinshaw’s focus on opposing Trump is misguided. He argues that voters need solutions rather than empathy for those who have lost jobs. “The people in our district who have lost their job or who are worried about losing their job, they don’t need empathy. They need solutions,” Whitson said.

While Trump is not particularly popular in the district—having garnered only 31% of the vote in his re-election bid—Whitson maintains that Trump’s policies are rooted in common sense. He criticized Democrats for what he describes as “radical left” policies that are out of touch with the needs of the community.

Whitson also addressed the contentious issue of transgender rights in schools, asserting that he believes it is a civil right for girls to have access to safe spaces. “My opponent believes it is a civil right for men who identify as girls or women to go into our girls’ locker rooms and watch them change,” he charged. “I think this is all backwards.” He emphasized the importance of ensuring safety for all children in public facilities.

In response, Walkinshaw accused Whitson of fixating on a small percentage of students while neglecting the broader educational needs of all children in the district. “What I hear from folks in our community, and what I’m focused on, is how 100% of our kids can succeed in the classrooms,” he stated.

As the campaign progresses, Whitson has attempted to link Walkinshaw to Zohran Mamdani, a socialist candidate who recently won the Democratic mayoral nomination in New York City. “This is someone who has a history of supporting a lot of the exact same type of policies that Mamdani is supporting,” Whitson claimed, urging voters to consider the implications of such associations.

Walkinshaw dismissed the comparison, stating that voters in the 11th District are primarily concerned with local issues rather than political events in New York City. “Not a single voter has asked me about the New York mayor’s election,” he said. “I care what happens to folks right here in the 11th District.”

Another significant topic in the election is the push for the Justice Department to release files related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. Walkinshaw noted that this issue resonates across the political spectrum, with many voters questioning whether there has been a cover-up regarding the files during the Biden administration.

If elected, Walkinshaw has pledged to sign a discharge petition led by Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California and Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, which calls for the release of Epstein-related documents. “I absolutely will sign it,” he affirmed. “I think the American people deserve to know.” He expressed a desire to uncover any potential cover-ups by the Trump administration.

Whitson, however, criticized Walkinshaw for being late to address the issue, asserting that he had called for full disclosure of the Epstein files months ago. He accused Walkinshaw of politicizing the matter for personal gain, stating, “How long has this case been going on, and now he finally wants to reach on those records?”

The outcome of this special election could have significant implications for the balance of power in the House of Representatives, where Republicans currently hold a slim majority. With three Democratic seats vacant and one held by the GOP, a victory for Walkinshaw would further narrow the Republican majority in a district that has not elected a Republican in nearly two decades.

As voters prepare to cast their ballots, the impact of Trump’s policies and the candidates’ differing visions for the future of the district remain at the forefront of this critical election.

Source: Original article

Nepal’s Youth Movement Challenges PM Oli’s Authority and Support

Staff ReporterConflict, Nation, Politics 0

Nepal’s Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli faces unprecedented challenges as a youth-led uprising against corruption and political stagnation gains momentum, leaving him increasingly isolated.

NEW DELHI: Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli of Nepal is finding his options dwindling as a youth-led uprising disrupts the political landscape. The unrest, which began just two days ago in response to the government’s decision to restrict access to social media platforms, has escalated into a nationwide revolt against corruption, unemployment, and decades of political stagnation.

From the capital city of Kathmandu to the border towns of Jhapa and Dhangadhi, streets are filled with Generation Z protesters expressing their frustration with the entrenched political system. These demonstrators are demanding an end to the “old politics” that has seen the Nepali Congress and the Communist Party alternating in power for years. The protests represent the most significant challenge Oli has faced to date, marking a sweeping rejection of Nepal’s political elite reminiscent of the 2006 uprising that abolished the monarchy.

The violent clashes have resulted in at least 19 fatalities and hundreds of injuries, as security forces have responded with tear gas, water cannons, and live ammunition. In retaliation, protesters have set fire to the residences of prominent political figures, including Maoist leader Pushpa Kamal Dahal, former Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba, and President Ram Chandra Poudel. Additionally, a school associated with Foreign Minister Arzu Rana Deuba was attacked, highlighting the widespread discontent that transcends party lines.

Sources indicate that protesters rushed to Tribhuvan International Airport amid rumors that Oli might attempt to flee the country, further illustrating the depth of anger directed at him. Four ministers, including the influential home minister, have already resigned, leaving Oli with limited options. “The prime minister is left with very few choices: resign, leave politics, or flee,” stated Babu Ram Bishwakarma, a senior journalist based in Kathmandu and editor of Nepalnews.com. “The public anger, especially among the youth, is far deeper than just social media access. The old system is collapsing before our eyes.”

Notably, young members of prominent non-political families have joined the protests, indicating a broad coalition of discontent across different societal segments. What complicates Oli’s situation further is the stance of the Nepal Army. Senior military officials are reportedly holding emergency meetings, but sources suggest that the army is hesitant to align itself with Oli against the protesters. Without military support, Oli’s government appears increasingly vulnerable.

The government’s attempts to quell the unrest by restoring social media access and offering compensation to victims have failed to alleviate the situation. Protesters are not merely seeking access to platforms; they are calling for a generational shift in leadership and governance.

Independent Kathmandu Mayor Balen Shah, who has studied in Bengaluru, and members of the newly formed Rastriya Swatantra Party are notably the only politicians not facing public ire. The current atmosphere in Nepal bears a resemblance to the recent youth-led demonstrations in Bangladesh that led to the downfall of Sheikh Hasina’s government. However, unlike the unrest in Dhaka, there is no indication of foreign involvement in Nepal’s protests; this anger is homegrown, and for Oli, the walls are closing in.

Source: Original article

Multiple Casualties Reported in Jerusalem Bus Shooting Attack

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics 0

At least five people were killed and fifteen injured in a shooting attack on a bus in Jerusalem, marking a significant escalation in violence amid ongoing tensions in the region.

At least five people were killed and more than a dozen injured when a group of attackers opened fire on a bus in Jerusalem on Monday morning, according to paramedics.

The shooting occurred at a busy intersection in northern Jerusalem, specifically on a road leading to Jewish settlements in east Jerusalem. Eyewitness reports indicate that two attackers boarded the bus and began firing indiscriminately.

Emergency responders reported that fifteen individuals sustained injuries, with six of those in serious condition. The chaotic scene was described as being covered in broken glass, with wounded individuals lying unconscious on the road and nearby sidewalk.

Authorities confirmed that the two attackers were “neutralized” shortly after the shooting began, but they have not disclosed any further details regarding the attackers’ identities.

This attack comes amid escalating violence in the region, as the ongoing conflict in Gaza approaches its two-year mark since the October 7 massacre. The war has led to increased hostilities in both the Israeli-occupied West Bank and within Israel itself. Palestinian militants have been involved in attacks against Israelis, while there has also been a noted rise in violence from settlers against Palestinians.

In response to the attack, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced via a post on X that he is convening an assessment with heads of the security establishment to address the situation in Jerusalem.

This is a developing story, and updates will be provided as more information becomes available.

Source: Original article

Tarun Chugh Criticizes AAP Government for Punjab Floods as Man-Made Disaster

Staff ReporterConflict, Nation, Politics 0

Tarun Chugh, BJP national general secretary, attributes the recent floods in Punjab to illegal sand mining by the AAP government, labeling the situation a “Mann-made disaster.”

Chandigarh: Tarun Chugh, the national general secretary of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has launched a scathing critique of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government in Punjab, led by Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann. Chugh asserts that the devastating floods currently affecting large portions of the state are not merely a natural disaster but rather a consequence of what he terms a “Mann-made disaster.”

In his statements, Chugh accused the Mann administration of permitting illegal sand mining, which he claims has compromised the structural integrity of river embankments, thereby making villages more susceptible to flooding. “The reason Punjab is being led towards disaster is the free hand given for illegal mining. People of Punjab are paying the price for Bhagwant Mann’s incompetence, failure, and inexperience,” he stated.

Chugh further criticized the state government for allegedly politicizing relief efforts. He contended that the AAP government was making announcements regarding compensation packages without conducting a thorough assessment of the damage caused by the floods. He highlighted that the central government had already allocated over Rs 11,000 crore for disaster management in Punjab.

“Prime Minister Narendra Modi has himself spoken to Bhagwant Mann. Home Minister Amit Shah has also assured every possible help. Yet the Punjab government has neither formed special teams nor undertaken a proper survey of losses,” Chugh noted. He emphasized that instead of taking decisive action on the ground, the AAP government appeared more focused on shifting blame and engaging in theatrics.

Chugh’s remarks come in the wake of growing frustration among residents in flood-affected areas, who have alleged that illegal mining activities and inadequate maintenance of embankments have exacerbated the damage. Opposition parties have accused the Mann government of being unprepared and slow to respond to the ongoing crisis.

According to Chugh, while the central government is prioritizing assistance, the state leadership has failed to act with the necessary responsibility. “Punjab needs a government that is serious about the plight of its people. Unfortunately, what we are witnessing today is negligence and immaturity,” he concluded.

Source: Original article

Mamdani Criticized for Using Children in Campaign Videos

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani faces criticism for using children in campaign videos while advocating for a social media-free childhood.

Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old candidate for mayor of New York City, has come under fire for featuring elementary school children in his political campaign videos. This backlash follows his recent remarks about how fortunate he was to have a childhood free from the influence of social media.

The criticism intensified as Mamdani shared videos of two children endorsing his candidacy on Instagram, despite his previous comments highlighting the negative impact of social media on youth interactions. The timing of these posts coincided with the launch of a statewide cellphone ban in New York City schools, aimed at safeguarding student mental health.

On Thursday, Mamdani was seen outside I.S. 5 in Queens, where he praised the new cellphone restrictions while welcoming families for the first day of the school year. In an Instagram post, he reflected on his own childhood, contrasting it with the current digital landscape. He wrote, “I consider myself fortunate—when I was a student, it was before social media had cannibalized the way that kids interact with one another.” This post was accompanied by a message about “hope and new beginnings” as students returned to school.

However, just days later, Mamdani’s campaign accounts showcased videos of two young children speaking directly to him and Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts. In one clip, a young girl confidently endorsed Mamdani, while in another, a boy expressed his support with Warren present.

Comments from followers on these posts reflected a mix of admiration and criticism. One user remarked on the girl’s articulate nature despite her small stature, while others questioned the appropriateness of using children to promote a political agenda. “Why are you using kids to promote your political agenda?” one follower asked, echoing sentiments from others who felt that involving children in such a manner was unacceptable.

This controversy arises in the context of a broader conversation about the role of technology in children’s lives. New York Governor Kathy Hochul recently defended the cellphone ban, arguing that it would help reduce distractions, improve mental health, and protect children during emergencies by preventing location-sharing. The new law prohibits the use of smartphones and smartwatches in public schools during school hours, except for medical or educational purposes.

Mamdani, who gained attention after unseating a longtime incumbent in the Democratic primary, is campaigning on a platform of progressive policies, including a proposed $30 minimum wage and a rent freeze. His approach has resonated with some voters, but the recent backlash over his use of children in campaign materials raises questions about the consistency of his message.

As the mayoral election approaches, Mamdani’s campaign will need to navigate the complexities of public perception, especially regarding the use of children in political discourse. The juxtaposition of his advocacy for a social media-free childhood with his campaign strategies may challenge his credibility among voters.

Fox News Digital reached out to Mamdani for comment regarding the criticism but has not yet received a response.

Source: Original article

Democrats Criticize Trump’s ‘War’ Threats Against U.S. Cities

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Democrats are condemning President Trump’s recent social media post that suggested military action and deportations in Chicago, calling it an inappropriate threat against U.S. cities.

Democrats across the United States are voicing strong criticism of President Donald Trump following a controversial social media post that appeared to threaten Chicago with military intervention and deportations. The post, shared on Truth Social, featured an AI-generated image of Trump styled as Robert Duvall’s character from the iconic Vietnam War film “Apocalypse Now.” The image was accompanied by the phrase “Chipocalypse Now” and a play on a famous quote from the film: “I love the smell of deportations in the morning.”

In the post, Trump stated, “Chicago about to find out why it’s called the Department of WAR,” referencing his recent executive order that renamed the Department of Defense to the Department of War. This provocative message has sparked outrage among local and state leaders, particularly as discussions about deploying the National Guard to address crime in Chicago have intensified.

California Governor Gavin Newsom was among the first to respond, condemning Trump for using military personnel as “political pawns.” He urged Americans not to become desensitized to such threats, stating, “The President of the United States is deploying the military onto US streets and using our troops like political pawns.” Newsom’s comments reflect a broader concern among Democrats regarding the militarization of domestic issues.

Illinois Senators Tammy Duckworth and Dick Durbin also expressed their disapproval of Trump’s remarks. Duckworth, a combat veteran and retired Army National Guard lieutenant colonel, asserted, “No Donald, Chicago is not your war zone.” Durbin echoed her sentiments, criticizing Trump for diverting attention from pressing national issues such as job reports and public health crises. He described the notion of deploying troops to Chicago as “disgusting” and an embarrassment for the nation.

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker joined the chorus of criticism, labeling Trump’s threats as a serious matter. “The President of the United States is threatening to go to war with an American city,” Pritzker wrote. “This is not a joke. This is not normal. Donald Trump isn’t a strongman; he’s a scared man. Illinois won’t be intimidated by a wannabe dictator.”

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has also been vocal in his opposition to Trump’s comments. He highlighted recent data indicating a decline in violent crime in the city, with homicides and robberies decreasing by over 30% and shootings dropping by nearly 40%. Johnson remarked, “The President’s threats are beneath the honor of our nation, but the reality is that he wants to occupy our city and break our Constitution.” He emphasized the need to protect democracy from what he described as authoritarianism.

The backlash against Trump’s post underscores the growing tension between the federal government and local authorities regarding crime and public safety. As discussions about the potential deployment of the National Guard continue, Illinois leaders remain firm in their stance against what they perceive as unwarranted military threats against American cities.

According to Fox News, the situation continues to evolve as local leaders prepare to respond to any federal actions that may arise.

Source: Original article

Punjab Government to Permit Sale of Flood-Deposited Sand by Farmers

Staff ReporterPolitics, Economy 0

Punjab will soon allow farmers to sell sand deposits from flood-affected fields, offering crucial relief amid significant crop losses and pending central funds totaling ₹60,000 crore.

In a significant move to assist farmers affected by recent floods, Manish Sisodia, the Punjab Incharge and a senior leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), announced on Sunday that the state government will soon permit farmers to sell sand deposits left on their fields by floodwaters. This policy is expected to be finalized and notified within the next two days.

“This will be a big relief for farmers. If they want to sell the sand, they can. The devastation is huge and relief has to be on a large scale,” Sisodia stated, emphasizing the government’s commitment to supporting those who have experienced extensive crop and property losses due to the floods.

He also welcomed Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s upcoming visit to Punjab on September 9, noting that the Prime Minister had already communicated with Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann regarding the situation. Additionally, Union Home Minister Amit Shah has reviewed the circumstances in the state. However, Sisodia expressed concern that substantial action from the central government has yet to materialize.

Highlighting the financial challenges faced by Punjab, Sisodia pointed out that nearly ₹60,000 crore owed to the state by the central government remains withheld. This includes ₹58,000 crore related to Goods and Services Tax (GST) and rural development allocations. “Before the Prime Minister comes, the Centre should release Punjab’s ₹60,000 crore,” he remarked.

In a separate critique, Sisodia took aim at Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan, who visited Punjab to assess the flood damage. “The devastation is so severe that even a hard-hearted person would be moved, but Chauhan is busy making political statements. His remarks reflect his mindset,” Sisodia said.

The forthcoming sand auction policy, once implemented, is anticipated to provide farmers with a direct means of financial recovery. It will allow them to monetize sand deposits that have rendered their farmland unfit for cultivation, thereby offering a much-needed economic lifeline.

As the situation develops, the Punjab government’s initiative to allow the sale of flood-deposited sand could play a crucial role in alleviating the financial burdens faced by farmers in the region.

Source: Original article

Japan Concedes Billions in Economic Gains Under Trump’s Trade Agreement

Staff ReporterBusiness, Politics 0

Japan’s recent trade agreement with the United States reveals significant concessions, including higher tariffs and substantial investments, favoring Washington’s economic interests.

New Delhi’s decision to resist pressure from Washington for a trade deal appears increasingly prescient. While Prime Minister Modi has maintained a firm stance against a sweeping agreement, Japan has moved forward, revealing the extent of its concessions to the United States.

On Thursday, the White House announced the implementation of the United States–Japan Agreement, a trade framework first unveiled in late July and officially enacted on September 4. Signed by President Donald Trump, the executive order outlines a new system of tariffs, market access rules, and investment commitments, which U.S. officials argue will rebalance the economic relationship between the two nations.

However, the details of the agreement suggest a significant tilt in favor of Washington. Central to the order is a baseline 15 percent tariff that will now apply to nearly all Japanese imports entering the United States. Products currently facing tariffs below this level will see their rates raised to 15 percent, while goods already taxed at higher rates will remain unchanged.

Certain sectors have been exempted from these tariffs, including aerospace products, generic pharmaceuticals, and specific natural resources that the United States cannot produce in sufficient quantities domestically. These exemptions are framed as necessary for U.S. security and health needs rather than as broad market openings for Japan.

On the other hand, Japan’s commitments under the agreement are considerably more extensive. Tokyo has agreed to increase its annual purchases of American agricultural goods by approximately $8 billion. This includes significant increases in imports of rice, corn, soybeans, fertilizers, and bioethanol. Notably, the minimum access quota for U.S. rice imports into Japan will rise by 75 percent.

Furthermore, Japan has pledged to recognize American safety certifications for passenger vehicles, allowing U.S.-made cars to be sold in Japan without undergoing additional domestic testing. This requirement mirrors a demand that India faced but ultimately rejected.

In addition to these agricultural and automotive commitments, the agreement mandates that Japan invest $550 billion directly into the United States. The American government will determine the sectors and projects that will receive this investment. White House officials assert that this unprecedented financial commitment will create hundreds of thousands of jobs and bolster the domestic industrial base. Critics, however, argue that Japan is not receiving comparable benefits in return.

The executive order also lays out enforcement mechanisms. The Department of Commerce, in collaboration with U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the International Trade Commission, will modify the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to reflect the new framework. The order applies retroactively to imports from August 7 and includes provisions for refunds on duties already paid. Additionally, it reserves the president’s right to adjust or expand tariffs at any time if Japan is found not to be fulfilling its commitments.

President Trump invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act to justify these measures, framing the deal as a necessary response to a national emergency declared earlier this year. He contended that ongoing trade deficits pose a threat to U.S. security by undermining the country’s manufacturing and defense industrial base. The order explicitly supersedes previous proclamations regarding aluminum, steel, automobiles, and copper imports when they conflict with the new framework.

While the White House characterizes the United States–Japan Agreement as reciprocal and historic, its structure places a heavier burden on Tokyo. Washington retains control over tariff enforcement, assesses whether Japan has met its obligations, and dictates where Japanese investment will be allocated within the U.S. The language of the order indicates that the U.S. views the deal primarily as a tool for reducing its trade deficit and strengthening its own industries, with Japan expected to bear the greater share of concessions.

Source: Original article

Hazratbal Emblem Vandalism Provokes Outrage and Calls for Arrests

Staff ReporterConflict, Nation, Politics 0

Tensions escalated in Srinagar after a video emerged showing individuals vandalizing the National Emblem at the Hazratbal Shrine, prompting strong condemnation from local officials.

Srinagar: Tensions flared in the Dargah area of Srinagar following the circulation of a video on social media that allegedly depicts individuals vandalizing the National Emblem engraved on a foundation stone at a public site.

The viral footage has drawn widespread condemnation, capturing a group of unidentified individuals attempting to deface the emblem, which was installed as part of a government development project.

Dr. Darakhshan Andrabi, Chairperson of the Jammu and Kashmir Waqf Board, issued a strong denunciation of the act, describing it as a serious affront to the sanctity of the Hazratbal Shrine and the sentiments of the Muslim community.

During a press conference held within the Hazratbal shrine complex, Dr. Andrabi characterized the vandalism as “nothing short of terrorism.” She expressed her shock, stating, “It felt like a cloudburst had struck me when I saw the emblem damaged. Those who did this are not just miscreants; they are terrorists.”

Dr. Andrabi appealed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah, and senior security officials to ensure that those responsible for the vandalism are swiftly apprehended.

She also suggested that the incident might have political motivations, asserting, “This disruption appears to have been deliberately orchestrated by political elements and their supporters. I had already warned about the possibility of such incidents being provoked.”

In addition, Dr. Andrabi announced plans to file a First Information Report (FIR) against all individuals involved, including a legislator whose recent social media comments allegedly inflamed the situation.

Reaffirming the Waqf Board’s commitment to safeguarding religious sites, she stated that the ongoing renovation work at Hazratbal aims to enhance both its sanctity and accessibility. “We will not allow anyone to politicize places of worship. These are sacred spaces meant for prayer and unity,” she concluded.

Source: Original article

Georgia Worksite Raid Highlights Impact of Trump’s Immigration Policies

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

On September 4, a massive immigration raid at a Hyundai plant in Georgia resulted in the detention of at least 475 workers, highlighting the chaos stemming from the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

On September 4, law enforcement agents from various state and federal agencies, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), conducted a sweeping immigration raid at a Hyundai manufacturing facility in southeastern Georgia. This operation reportedly led to the detention of at least 475 workers, many of whom were South Korean nationals, including some individuals with legal status. This event marks the largest worksite raid in recent history.

In the aftermath of the raid, the American Immigration Council issued a statement addressing the implications of such actions. Michelle Lapointe, the legal director at the American Immigration Council, who is based in the Atlanta area, emphasized the negative impact of these raids on communities and families.

“These raids don’t make anyone safer. They terrorize workers, destabilize communities, and push families into chaos,” Lapointe stated. “This historic raid may make dramatic headlines, but it does nothing to fix the problems in our broken immigration system: a lack of legal pathways and a misguided focus on punishing workers and families who pose no threat to our communities. Raiding worksites isn’t reform; it’s political theater at the expense of families, communities, and our economy.”

Nan Wu, the director of research at the American Immigration Council, also spoke about the broader implications of such raids. “Immigrant workers are the backbone of our economy, filling critical labor gaps in manufacturing and beyond. Nationwide, 5.7% of manufacturing workers are undocumented, and here in Georgia, they make up 6.7% of that workforce,” Wu noted. “Raiding worksites instead of fixing our pathways to legal employment is cruel, wasteful, and deeply shortsighted. The chilling effect of these raids will make it less likely that people will show up to work, deepening labor shortages and hitting businesses hard at an already precarious economic moment.”

Experts from the American Immigration Council are available to discuss why worksite raids are counterproductive and harmful, as well as to propose smarter, more effective immigration solutions.

Source: Original article

Ex-India Cricketer Applies for Selector Position Amid Controversy

Staff ReporterCricket, Election, Politics 0

Praveen Kumar, a former Indian cricketer known for a controversial incident in Australia, has applied for a position on the national selection committee.

As the deadline of September 10 looms for applications to fill two vacancies in the senior men’s selection committee led by Ajit Agarkar, former Indian cricketer Praveen Kumar has submitted his application to become a national selector.

The 38-year-old Kumar, who has had a notable career in cricket, is seeking to transition from player to selector, aiming to contribute to the future of Indian cricket. His experience on the field, coupled with his understanding of the game, could provide valuable insights to the selection process.

Kumar’s journey in cricket has not been without its controversies. He is perhaps best remembered for an incident during a tour in Australia, where he was involved in a confrontation with a fan. This moment, while contentious, has not overshadowed his contributions to the sport.

As the cricketing landscape in India continues to evolve, the role of selectors becomes increasingly crucial in identifying and nurturing talent. Kumar’s application reflects his desire to play a part in shaping the future of Indian cricket.

The selection committee plays a vital role in determining the players who represent the nation, making the selection process a significant responsibility. With Kumar’s application, the committee may gain a fresh perspective from someone who has experienced the pressures of international cricket firsthand.

As the deadline approaches, it remains to be seen who else will apply for these coveted positions and how the committee will evolve under Agarkar’s leadership.

According to Source Name, Kumar’s application is part of a broader trend of former players stepping into administrative roles within cricket, aiming to leverage their on-field experiences to enhance the sport’s governance.

Source: Original article

Addressing Home Wi-Fi Security Risks Before Connecting Is Essential

Staff ReporterHealth, Politics, Technology 0

Ensuring the security of your home Wi-Fi network is crucial for protecting personal and professional information from potential cyber threats.

Home Wi-Fi networks serve as the backbone for internet connectivity in most households, linking laptops, smartphones, smart TVs, and various other devices. When properly secured, these networks provide a convenient and private means to browse the internet, stream content, and work remotely. However, the term “private” does not always equate to “safe.” Wi-Fi security can be easily compromised if settings are weak or equipment is outdated.

A recent inquiry from Carol in Smithtown, New York, highlights a common concern: “Is it safe to browse the internet on your own laptop using only your home Wi-Fi?” This question underscores a broader issue; many individuals rely on their home networks daily without fully understanding their security status.

To ensure your home Wi-Fi network is secure, it is essential to understand the risks involved and implement protective measures. Your home Wi-Fi is not merely a gateway to the internet; it is a portal to your personal and professional life. Activities such as online banking, work emails, and video calls traverse this network. If security is lacking, sensitive information could be intercepted or exposed.

One prevalent misconception is that a home network is inherently safe due to its private nature. In reality, hackers often target residential networks, which typically have weaker defenses compared to corporate networks. A nearby individual could connect to your network if your password is weak or your encryption is outdated. This not only slows down your internet speed but also allows unauthorized users to exploit your connection for illegal activities. If compromised, sensitive information like passwords, credit card numbers, and personal documents could be intercepted.

Insecure networks can also serve as conduits for malicious software to infiltrate your devices, often without your knowledge. Smart devices, including security cameras, thermostats, and speakers, can be hijacked and used for spying or as part of larger cyberattacks. Even if you trust everyone in your household, your network remains vulnerable to external threats. With the increasing number of connected devices today—ranging from laptops and phones to tablets, TVs, and IoT gadgets—there are more entry points for attackers than ever before. Securing your Wi-Fi effectively closes these vulnerabilities.

The foundation of Wi-Fi security ultimately lies in your router, which acts as the gatekeeper for your entire home network. An old, poorly configured router lacking important updates can undermine even the strongest passwords and best digital habits. Investing in a reliable router is one of the most critical steps you can take to enhance your home Wi-Fi security. A modern, well-supported router offers stronger encryption, better control over connected devices, and regular updates that address security flaws.

It is also vital to check for firmware updates from the manufacturer regularly. While some newer routers update automatically, many require manual intervention to install patches. Outdated firmware can leave known vulnerabilities exposed.

Another essential step is to change the default login password for your router immediately. Most routers come with basic credentials like “admin/admin,” which are widely known and can easily be exploited by attackers. If your router supports it, enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) for logins adds an extra layer of security, making it significantly harder for attackers to gain control even if they manage to steal your password.

Encryption is crucial for ensuring that data transmitted across your network is scrambled, rendering it useless to anyone attempting to intercept it. The current gold standard for Wi-Fi encryption is WPA3, which provides the strongest protection. If your router does not support WPA3, WPA2 remains a safe and widely used option. It is advisable to log into your router’s settings to confirm the level of encryption your network is utilizing.

Your Wi-Fi password acts as the digital key to your home. A short or easily guessable password is akin to leaving a spare key under the doormat, making it accessible to anyone determined enough to find it. Instead, create a long passphrase that combines upper and lowercase letters, numbers, and symbols, aiming for at least 12 to 16 characters. Consider using a password manager to generate and store complex passwords securely.

In addition to a robust password, regularly checking which devices are connected to your network is wise. Most routers allow you to view a list of active devices. If you notice anything unfamiliar, investigate further; it could be a neighbor using your connection or, in the worst-case scenario, an intruder.

Disabling Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS) is another precautionary measure. While this feature was designed to simplify connecting new devices, it has security vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit. Some users opt to enable MAC address filtering, which restricts access to specific devices. To further reduce risk, consider setting up a separate guest network for smart devices and visitors. This way, if one device is compromised, your laptops and phones remain secure.

It is also crucial to keep all connected devices updated. From laptops and smartphones to smart bulbs and thermostats, every gadget represents a potential entry point. A weak link in one device can jeopardize your entire network.

A Virtual Private Network (VPN) is another essential tool for enhancing online privacy. By creating an encrypted tunnel between your device and the websites or apps you use, a VPN conceals your online activities from outsiders, including your internet service provider. A reliable VPN is vital for safeguarding your online privacy and ensuring a secure, high-speed connection.

While your Wi-Fi settings form the first line of defense, protecting the devices connected to your network is equally important. Installing robust antivirus software can block malware that may spread through downloads, emails, or malicious links. This additional layer of protection ensures that even if a threat bypasses your router’s defenses, your devices remain secure.

To answer Carol’s question: Is it safe to browse the internet on your home Wi-Fi? The answer is yes, but only if you take the necessary steps to secure it. Strong router settings, proper encryption, and a solid password do most of the heavy lifting. Developing habits such as regularly checking connected devices, keeping all devices updated, and utilizing tools like a VPN can provide even greater peace of mind.

When was the last time you checked your router settings or updated its firmware? Take the time to ensure your home network is secure.

Source: Original article

What H-1B Visa Holders Should Do If They Receive a Notice to Appear

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Visa 0

Laid-off H-1B visa holders in the U.S. face new challenges as Notices to Appear in immigration court are issued before the grace period ends, creating uncertainty for many families.

H-1B visa holders who lose their jobs and receive a Notice to Appear (NTA) in immigration court are navigating a complex and evolving legal landscape. Typically, laid-off H-1B workers are granted a 60-day grace period to secure new employment or change their visa status. However, recent reports indicate a troubling trend: NTAs are being issued before this grace period has expired, leading to increased anxiety and uncertainty for many visa holders and their families.

According to the Pew Research Center, approximately 400,000 H-1B visas were approved in 2024, with 73% of those going to workers from India. Most of these visas are renewals, highlighting the significant reliance on this visa category among Indian nationals.

To gain insight into the current situation, India Currents spoke with Sameer Khedekar, Founder and Managing Attorney at Vanguard Visa Law in California. The following discussion, lightly edited for clarity, sheds light on the recent changes affecting H-1B visa holders.

Sameer began by outlining the broader implications of recent changes in the H-1B visa process. He noted that a February memo from USCIS indicated that NTAs would be issued to anyone lacking lawful status in the U.S. Initially, this seemed reasonable, but by July, reports emerged of H-1B workers being laid off and subsequently receiving NTAs.

When an H-1B worker leaves their job, whether through a layoff or voluntarily, the employer is required to notify USCIS. This notification triggers the issuance of an NTA, regardless of the employee’s subsequent actions to maintain their status, such as applying for a new job or changing their visa status.

Historically, H-1B holders have enjoyed a 60-day grace period to seek new employment or change their status. This grace period has been uniformly granted since its implementation in 2016. However, the current administration’s approach appears to be eroding this safety net, as NTAs are being issued without consideration of the grace period.

Sameer explained that when an H-1B holder leaves their employer, the withdrawal of their H-1B status often triggers an automatic NTA. This occurs regardless of whether the individual has taken steps to apply for a new H-1B, H-4, or B-1/B-2 visa. Consequently, many individuals find themselves in immigration court, even when they have acted to preserve their status.

While some cases have been dismissed in court due to applicants demonstrating that they maintained their status, the outcomes can vary significantly depending on the judge and the court. The recent wave of layoffs from major companies like Microsoft and Intel has compounded the issue, creating chaos for many H-1B holders.

For those facing layoffs, it is crucial to understand the timing of when their employer will withdraw their H-1B status. Sameer recommended that employees proactively discuss with their employers the possibility of delaying the withdrawal until after the grace period has ended. This conversation, while potentially awkward, is essential given the current climate.

Sameer also highlighted the emotional toll this situation takes on families, particularly those who have lived in the U.S. for many years. The fear of separation due to immigration proceedings is palpable, especially among families with children who have grown up in the U.S.

In terms of legal options, Sameer emphasized the importance of taking action during the grace period. If a visa holder is unable to secure employment within the 60-day window, leaving the country before an NTA is issued is the safest course of action. This approach allows for a case dismissal if the individual departs before the NTA is formally issued.

For those who do receive an NTA, Sameer advised that filing for a change of status to H-4 or applying for a B-1/B-2 visa can help maintain legal status. Even if a job offer is pending, having an application on file can be sufficient to convince the courts to dismiss the case.

Sameer also addressed the challenges faced by non-working spouses and children of H-1B holders. The anxiety surrounding potential deportation can be overwhelming, especially for families who have built their lives in the U.S. Fortunately, many individuals have successfully navigated the legal system to maintain their status, but the process remains fraught with uncertainty.

As the situation continues to evolve, Sameer encouraged H-1B visa holders to remain vigilant and proactive. Monitoring the status of their visa and seeking legal counsel tailored to their individual circumstances is essential. Engaging a personal immigration attorney, rather than relying on company resources, can provide the necessary support in navigating these complex issues.

In conclusion, the current landscape for H-1B visa holders is marked by uncertainty and anxiety. As the government tightens regulations and issues NTAs more frequently, it is crucial for visa holders to understand their rights and options. By taking proactive steps and seeking legal guidance, individuals can better navigate this challenging environment.

Source: Original article

Texas Congressman Proposes Tariff Plan to Address National Debt

Staff ReporterBusiness, Economy, Politics 0

Texas Congressman Nathaniel Moran has proposed new legislation to direct surplus tariff revenues into a trust fund dedicated to reducing the national debt, which currently stands at $37 trillion.

Texas Representative Nathaniel Moran is introducing a novel approach to tackling the United States’ national debt by leveraging tariff revenues. His proposed legislation, known as the Tariff Revenue Used to Secure Tomorrow (TRUST) Act, aims to funnel billions in new trade revenues into a dedicated trust fund focused solely on reducing the country’s staggering $37 trillion national debt.

The TRUST Act would create a special account at the Treasury Department, termed the Tariff Trust Fund. Beginning in fiscal year 2026, any tariff revenue collected above the baseline level established in 2025 would automatically be allocated to this fund. By law, these funds would be restricted to one purpose: reducing the federal deficit whenever the government finds itself in the red.

“President Trump’s bold use of tariffs has already proven effective in bringing foreign nations back to the negotiating table and securing better trade deals for America,” Moran stated in an interview with Fox News Digital. “That short-term success has produced record-high revenues, and now we need to make sure Washington doesn’t squander them.” He emphasized that the TRUST Act ensures these funds are directed where they are most needed—toward alleviating the national debt and safeguarding the financial future of the nation.

Moran’s initiative comes on the heels of a significant increase in tariff revenues, with the U.S. collecting over $31 billion in August alone, marking the highest monthly total for 2025 to date. According to data from the Treasury Department, total tariff revenue for the year has surpassed $183.6 billion as of August 29.

The rise in tariff revenues has been notable, increasing from $17.4 billion in April to $23.9 billion in May, and further climbing to $28 billion in June and $29 billion in July. If this trend continues, the U.S. could potentially collect as much tariff revenue in just four to five months as it did during the entirety of the previous year. In comparison, tariff revenues at this point in fiscal year 2024 stood at $86.5 billion.

This surge in revenue coincides with a recent federal appeals court ruling that determined President Donald Trump overstepped his authority by using emergency powers to impose extensive global tariffs. The court’s decision, issued on August 29, clarified that the power to set such tariffs resides with Congress or within existing trade policy frameworks. However, the ruling does not affect tariffs imposed under other legal authorities, including Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.

Attorney General Pam Bondi has announced that the Justice Department plans to appeal this decision to the Supreme Court, while the court has allowed the tariffs to remain in place until October 14.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent previously indicated that the Trump administration could allocate a portion of the tariff revenue toward reducing the national debt. As of September 3, the national debt had reached approximately $37.4 trillion, a figure that has intensified discussions in Washington regarding government spending, taxation, and measures to control the growing deficit.

“Complacency is no longer an option. We must act with urgency and begin to bring down our national debt immediately,” Moran added in his statement.

Bessent has also suggested that tariffs could generate more than $500 billion in revenue for the federal government. While U.S. businesses are responsible for paying these import taxes, the economic burden often shifts to consumers, as companies typically raise prices to offset the costs.

Source: Original article

Pakistani Drone Narcotics Operation Disrupted in Kathua; Four Arrested

Staff ReporterConflict, Nation, Politics 0

Jammu and Kashmir Police and the Border Security Force have dismantled a Pakistan-backed narcotics syndicate in Kathua, arresting four individuals and seizing drugs worth crores.

In a significant operation against cross-border smuggling, Jammu and Kashmir Police, in collaboration with the Border Security Force (BSF), successfully dismantled an interstate narcotics syndicate in Kathua. This operation was reportedly orchestrated by handlers based in Pakistan, who utilized drones to drop drug consignments across the border.

Authorities apprehended four individuals involved in the syndicate, three of whom hail from Punjab, while one is from Jammu. These individuals are believed to be part of a network that receives and distributes narcotics, further complicating the region’s ongoing battle against drug trafficking.

The breakthrough was achieved during a joint operation in the Hiranagar sector, which was launched following specific intelligence inputs. During this operation, law enforcement officials recovered substantial quantities of heroin and opium, valued at crores of rupees. This seizure represents a significant setback to the cross-border drug trade.

According to police reports, the Pakistani handlers were employing drones to drop narcotics in border areas of Kathua. Local operatives would then collect these consignments and distribute them across various states through an extensive interstate network.

In response to the operation, a case has been registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) at the Hiranagar Police Station. Investigations are ongoing to identify additional members of the syndicate and to trace the financial channels that facilitate this illicit trade.

Officials emphasized that the dismantling of this syndicate underscores Pakistan’s persistent efforts to infiltrate drugs into India. This strategy is viewed as part of a broader “narco-terror” agenda aimed at financing terrorism and destabilizing the region.

As the investigation continues, authorities remain vigilant in their efforts to combat the growing threat posed by cross-border narcotics trafficking.

Source: Original article

Israel Captures 40% of Gaza City in New Military Offensive

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, Politics 0

Israel has gained control of 40% of Gaza City as the IDF intensifies its offensive against Hamas, aiming to achieve its military objectives, including the return of hostages.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) announced on Thursday that they will continue to target Hamas’ infrastructure and expand their control over Gaza City until all military objectives are met. An Israeli military spokesperson confirmed that the IDF currently holds 40% of the territory in Gaza City.

Brigadier General Effie Defrin addressed reporters during a news briefing, stating, “We continue to damage Hamas’ infrastructure. Today, we hold 40% of the territory of Gaza City. We will continue to operate until all the war’s objectives are achieved. First and foremost, the return of the hostages and the dismantling of Hamas’ rule.”

Last week, Israel designated Gaza City as a combat zone, with certain districts marked as red zones, urging residents to evacuate. Senior officials have indicated that military rule may be imposed, and Palestinians have been advised to move south. Some coalition partners of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are advocating for a permanent Israeli settlement in Gaza.

As the IDF presses deeper into eastern suburbs, Gaza health officials reported that at least 53 Palestinians were killed on Thursday, primarily in Gaza City. Residents have described heavy bombardments in areas such as Zeitoun, Sabra, Tuffah, and Shejaia, while Israeli tanks advanced into Sheikh Radwan, northwest of the city center, destroying homes and igniting fires in encampments.

Mahmoud Bassal, a spokesperson for Gaza’s civil emergency service, criticized the bombardment, stating that it created a “fire belt” targeting civilians. He added, “Even if Israel issues warnings, there are no places that can accommodate the people.”

Regarding evacuations, Israeli officials reported that approximately 70,000 people have fled Gaza City. However, Palestinian authorities contend that far fewer have left, with tens of thousands still in the path of advancing forces.

Israel’s major offensive in Gaza City, dubbed “Operation Gideon’s Chariots,” was launched on August 10, involving the deployment of tens of thousands of reservists alongside regular troops. Currently, there are still 48 hostages believed to be held in Gaza.

Netanyahu had previously stated that Israel intended to conquer all of Gaza after indirect negotiations with Hamas for a ceasefire and hostage release collapsed in July.

Source: Original article

School Vaccine Mandates May Be Lifted in Southern State, Surgeon General Says

Staff ReporterHealth, Politics, Politics 0

Florida’s Surgeon General announced plans to eliminate school vaccine mandates, emphasizing individual choice and informed consent over government requirements.

Florida’s Surgeon General, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, has revealed that the state is taking steps to abolish all vaccine mandates for schoolchildren. This announcement came during a press conference held on Wednesday alongside Governor Ron DeSantis.

Ladapo stated that the Florida Department of Health (FDH), in collaboration with the governor’s office, aims to eliminate “every last one” of the existing vaccine mandates. He expressed strong opposition to these mandates, saying, “Every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and slavery.” He further asserted, “Who am I, as a government or anyone else, to tell you what you should put in your body? I don’t have that right. Your body is a gift from God.”

Governor DeSantis echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the importance of informed consent. He remarked that “information given to individuals, where they can then make an informed decision, should be the bedrock of how we function in health and in medicine.”

Currently, Florida requires eight vaccinations for children attending childcare, preschool, and K–12 schools. These include the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP), polio (IPV), measles, mumps and rubella (MMR), varicella, Hib, pneumococcal conjugate, and hepatitis B vaccines. For K-12 students, specific doses of DTaP, IPV, MMR, hepatitis B, and varicella are mandated, along with a Tdap vaccine for seventh graders.

Dr. Marc Siegel, a senior medical analyst at Fox News, commented on the effectiveness of vaccine mandates, noting that they may not be necessary for all vaccines. He pointed out that for vaccines that prevent transmission, such as those for measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, or polio, school mandates can be justified. “The only way to achieve herd immunity is through vaccination, where the spread is stopped,” he explained. He added that those who cannot receive certain vaccines due to health conditions are protected by the immunity of those around them.

Siegel emphasized the importance of creating a community of immunity around highly contagious viruses through vaccination, describing it as “responsible public health.”

Florida would be the first state to implement a statewide ban on vaccine mandates for schoolchildren, although other states have proposed or enacted similar legislation. Recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates a decline in vaccinations among kindergartners for the 2024-2025 school year, with exemptions from one or more vaccines increasing from 3.3% to 3.6%.

In response to the announcement, Dr. Susan Kressly, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, expressed concern. She stated, “We are concerned that today’s announcement by Gov. DeSantis will put children in Florida public schools at higher risk for getting sick, and have ripple effects across their community.”

Parents and guardians with questions regarding vaccinations are encouraged to consult with their healthcare providers to make informed decisions about their children’s health.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Lawmaker Proposes Bill to Limit Military Deployments

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi has introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act to limit presidential authority over military deployments without state approval.

WASHINGTON, DC — Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) has taken a significant step by introducing an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that seeks to restrict the president’s authority to deploy U.S. military forces or federalize the National Guard without obtaining approval from state officials.

This legislative measure, co-sponsored by Congresswoman Haley Stevens (D-MI), is a reintroduction of their previously proposed Stop Trump’s Abuse of Power Act. The amendment arises in response to actions taken by former President Donald Trump, who threatened to deploy the National Guard to Chicago without a request from Illinois officials. Additionally, Trump had previously sent active-duty forces to cities such as Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.

Krishnamoorthi expressed concerns regarding the implications of such unilateral military actions, describing them as an overreach of executive power that could undermine constitutional protections. “No president should be able to turn the U.S. military into their personal police force,” he stated. He further criticized Trump’s threats to militarize Chicago, suggesting that such moves would lead to “chaos and spectacle” rather than effectively addressing public safety issues.

The proposed amendment would mandate that a governor or state executive must formally request federal military support prior to any deployment of active-duty personnel or the federalization of the National Guard. Furthermore, it would prohibit the use of military troops in response to peaceful protests or demonstrations without the necessary state approval.

Currently, the amendment is under review by the House Rules Committee, which will determine whether it can advance to a floor vote as part of the NDAA.

As discussions around military authority and state rights continue, Krishnamoorthi’s initiative reflects a growing concern among lawmakers regarding the balance of power between federal and state governments, particularly in the context of public safety and civil liberties.

Source: Original article

Federal Appeals Court Upholds Illinois Gun Restrictions on Public Transit

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

A federal appeals court has upheld Illinois’ ban on carrying firearms on public transit, reversing a previous ruling that deemed the restrictions unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

A federal appeals court has affirmed Illinois’ prohibition on carrying firearms on public transit, overturning a lower court decision that found the gun restrictions unconstitutional. The Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued its ruling on Tuesday, with Judge Joshua Kolar writing for the majority. He stated that the ban “is comfortably situated in a centuries-old practice of limiting firearms in sensitive and crowded, confined places.”

Judge Kolar emphasized that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to self-defense but does not prevent lawmakers from enacting regulations that ensure public transportation systems remain free from accessible firearms. “We are asked whether the state may temporarily disarm its citizens as they travel in crowded and confined metal tubes unlike anything the Founders envisioned,” he noted. The court drew on historical regulatory traditions to determine that the ban does not violate the Second Amendment.

Last year, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled in favor of four plaintiffs who argued that the restrictions on carrying guns on public buses and trains were unconstitutional. This decision was influenced by a 2022 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, which established a new standard for assessing the constitutionality of gun restrictions. The district court found that there was no historical precedent to justify the transit gun restrictions.

However, the appeals court concluded that the ban is constitutionally valid. “Our concern is whether the law aligns with the nation’s tradition,” the majority opinion stated. “We hold that [the law] is constitutional because it comports with regulatory principles that originated in the Founding era and continue to the present.” The case, initiated by several Illinois gun owners and supported by gun rights organizations, is anticipated to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The plaintiffs contended that the transit restrictions contradicted the Supreme Court’s 2022 Bruen decision. Nonetheless, the Seventh Circuit maintained that the state had demonstrated a sufficient historical basis for designating crowded public transport as a “sensitive place.” The firearm ban on public transit was enacted in 2013, making Illinois the last state in the U.S. to permit concealed carry in public.

In addition to prohibiting firearms on buses and trains, the legislation also restricts gun possession in hospitals and other public areas. Judge Kolar, appointed by President Joe Biden, was joined in the majority opinion by Judge Kenneth Ripple, who was appointed by former President Ronald Reagan. Judge Amy St. Eve, selected by President Donald Trump, wrote a separate concurring opinion, addressing a complex jurisdictional question regarding how to evaluate claims of injury related to the inability to engage in protected activities.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Military Action Against Cartel Vessel Signals Warning to Maduro

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, USA 0

The recent U.S. Marine strikes on a cartel vessel off Venezuela signal a significant shift in the Trump administration’s approach to combating narco-terrorism in the region.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the United States will intensify its efforts against narco-terrorist organizations following a series of unprecedented strikes by U.S. Marines on a cartel-operated vessel off the coast of Venezuela earlier this week.

This military action, which resulted in the deaths of 11 members of the Tren de Aragua cartel, represents a marked departure from previous U.S. strategies aimed at countering the international drug trade. Historically, U.S. military operations have focused on seizing and apprehending cartel members since the late 1980s. However, this latest strike, which targeted a group designated as a terrorist organization by the Trump administration in February, indicates a more aggressive stance.

“The gloves are off,” stated Isaias Medina, a former Venezuelan diplomat who has become a dissident under the Nicolás Maduro regime. He emphasized that the Marine strike on the Tren de Aragua vessel, which was allegedly engaged in narcotics trafficking, signifies a pivotal moment in the ongoing battle against organized crime on an international scale.

President Donald Trump has consistently expressed his strong opposition to Maduro’s regime, even offering a $50 million reward for information leading to Maduro’s arrest and conviction. In response to the deployment of U.S. troops near Venezuela, Maduro condemned the action, claiming it was an attempt to instigate regime change and asserting, “Venezuela is confronting the biggest threat that has been seen on our continent in the last 100 years.”

The White House has faced scrutiny and international pushback regarding the implications of this military strike for future U.S. policy in South America. During a visit to Mexico, Rubio sought to clarify the administration’s intentions, stating, “The President of the United States is going to wage war on narco-terrorist organizations.”

Rubio criticized the previous policy of simply seizing and apprehending cartel members, arguing that it has proven ineffective. “These drug cartels know they’re going to lose 2% of their cargo—they bake it into their economics,” he explained. “What will stop them is when you blow them up, when you get rid of them.”

Medina pointed out that Maduro’s failure to address the activities of international narcotics rings has created an opportunity for the Trump administration to take decisive action. He noted that the Marines adhered to strict rules of engagement while targeting a terrorist organization believed to be trafficking drugs intended for the U.S.

“Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua, backed by Maduro, operates much like other state-sponsored terror groups, including Iran’s support for the Houthis, Hamas, and Hezbollah, all of which destabilize regions through illicit trade and violence,” Medina said. “Safe harbors in international waters are no longer sanctuaries for traffickers and smugglers.” He added that this strike sends a clear message that American forces and their allies will provide strong resistance to such operations.

Despite Maduro’s concerns that Trump’s ultimate goal is to oust his government, experts remain skeptical about the likelihood of significant regime change. Juan Cruz, a former senior director for Western Hemisphere affairs at the National Security Council, expressed doubt that the military deployment was intended to achieve that specific objective. “I can’t imagine this deployment had that specifically as an objective,” Cruz told Fox News Digital. “But [Trump] will certainly take that as a win if, for some reason, it had that outcome.”

As the situation unfolds, the implications of this military action will likely continue to shape the dynamics of U.S.-Venezuela relations and the broader fight against narco-terrorism in the region.

Source: Original article

Plot to Kidnap Indian Diplomats in Dhaka Foiled, Reports Indicate

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics 0

An Intelligence Bureau alert has uncovered a foiled plot to attack the Indian High Commission in Dhaka, involving Al Qaeda and Jamaatul Ansar fil Hindal Sharqia.

NEW DELHI – A recent alert from the Intelligence Bureau has revealed that a significant attack was being planned against the Indian High Commission in Dhaka. The intelligence indicates that the plot involved the terrorist groups Al Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent and Jamaatul Ansar fil Hindal Sharqia.

The proposed plan reportedly included a siege of the Indian High Commission, with the intention of taking diplomats hostage. The attackers aimed to leverage this situation to demand the extradition of Sheikh Hasina, who has been granted refuge in India following the collapse of her government.

Sheikh Hasina’s extradition has become a contentious issue in Bangladesh-India relations, with the Bangladeshi government actively seeking her return. Security officials suspect that the terror groups involved may have received external support, potentially from Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). This suspicion is bolstered by previous incidents where ISI-linked networks have smuggled arms and ammunition into Bangladesh since 2023.

Officials also referenced the 2014 Burdwan case in West Bengal, where explosives were being prepared for transport to Bangladesh, highlighting the ongoing security concerns in the region.

According to Indian security agencies, recent developments indicate that training camps have been established in Bangladesh, where operatives from groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed are reportedly providing training to local militants.

The plan to target the Indian mission in Dhaka and demand Sheikh Hasina’s extradition aligns with the agenda of groups like Jamaat-e-Islami, which has been a vocal opponent of her government.

As Bangladesh approaches its elections, tentatively scheduled for February next year, the political landscape remains fraught with tension. Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League has been barred from contesting, while the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) is currently positioned as the frontrunner. Security assessments suggest that Jamaat and other similar groups continue to wield significant influence in the political arena.

These developments underscore the complex interplay of politics and security in the region, as both India and Bangladesh navigate the implications of these threats.

Source: Original article

Bihar BJP Leaders Meet Shah in Delhi Ahead of Upcoming Polls

Staff ReporterElection, Politics 0

Senior Bihar BJP leaders are meeting with Amit Shah in Delhi to strategize on seat-sharing, anti-incumbency issues, and the NDA’s approach ahead of the 2025 elections.

Senior leaders of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) from Bihar have convened in Delhi for a crucial strategy meeting with Union Home Minister Amit Shah. The discussions are set to focus on finalizing seat-sharing arrangements with allies, evaluating anti-incumbency sentiments against sitting Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs), and assessing the implications of recent political developments in the state. BJP national president Jagat Prakash Nadda is also expected to participate in the meeting.

Sources indicate that one of the significant topics on the agenda will be the demands from the Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas), which is advocating for more than 40 seats in the upcoming elections. This request complicates the seat distribution process within the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), requiring careful negotiation among coalition partners.

The general consensus among Bihar BJP leaders, based on the LJP’s historical performance, suggests that the party should not be allocated more than 20 seats. This perspective stems from the LJP’s limited influence in certain areas, despite the ambitious claims made by its leadership.

According to party officials, while most constituencies contested by the Janata Dal (United) have been determined, a few remain under discussion, as the BJP is also keen to contest these seats. Clarity on these remaining constituencies is anticipated as the meeting progresses.

Internal surveys have painted a concerning picture for the BJP, revealing that several MLAs, including a prominent minister, are facing significant anti-incumbency challenges. In some cases, assessments from party cadres have ranked sitting leaders in third place, underscoring the urgency for a strategic overhaul. In light of these findings, party leaders express hope that the candidate list will be announced well in advance of the election schedule, rather than delaying until the last moment, as has been the trend in previous elections.

Notable attendees at the Delhi meeting include Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary, Vijay Sinha, state in-charge Vinod Tawde, co-in-charge Deepak Prakash, state president Dilip Jaiswal, and Union ministers Giriraj Singh and Nityanand Rai.

The discussions will also encompass feedback from the grassroots regarding government programs, the public’s response to Rahul Gandhi’s recent “Vote Adhikar Yatra,” and reactions to incidents involving opposition workers who have verbally attacked Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his mother.

This strategic meeting comes just ahead of Modi’s scheduled visit to Purnia on September 13, marking his seventh trip to Bihar in recent months.

Source: Original article

England vs. South Africa 1st ODI: Live Streaming and Telecast Details

Staff ReporterCricket, Election, Sports 0

Sonny Baker is poised to make his England debut in the first ODI against South Africa at Headingley.

The highly anticipated first One Day International (ODI) between England and South Africa is set to take place at Headingley, where fans will be eager to see the debut of Sonny Baker.

Baker, a promising talent, has garnered attention for his performances and is expected to bring fresh energy to the England squad as they face off against a formidable South African team.

This match marks the beginning of a series that promises to be exciting, with both teams looking to establish early momentum. England, known for their aggressive batting style and strategic gameplay, will aim to capitalize on home advantage.

South Africa, on the other hand, will be looking to showcase their depth and skill, making for a competitive encounter. The clash between these two cricketing nations is always a highlight on the international calendar.

Fans can look forward to a thrilling match filled with high stakes and intense competition as both teams vie for victory in this opening ODI.

As the match approaches, viewers are encouraged to check local listings for live streaming options and telecast details to ensure they do not miss any of the action.

According to NDTV Sports, the excitement surrounding Baker’s debut adds an extra layer of intrigue to this already captivating series.

Source: Original article

Jury Duty Phone Scams Surge as Fraudsters Impersonate Officials

Staff ReporterLaw/Legal, Politics 0

Fraudsters are increasingly impersonating local officials in jury duty scams, threatening victims with arrest to extract payments, prompting warnings from law enforcement agencies.

Fraudsters are finding new ways to deceive individuals, with one of the latest schemes involving impersonation of local officials. This tactic exploits the fear of arrest by claiming that victims have missed jury duty and now face legal consequences.

Scammers often initiate these fraud attempts with calls from blocked or unknown numbers. During these calls, they assert that the recipient has failed to appear for jury duty and is now subject to an arrest warrant. The scammers typically demand payment, which is often requested through wire transfers or gift cards.

A key warning sign of this scam is any demand for money to avoid arrest or legal trouble. It is crucial never to provide personal information or make payments to unknown callers.

While these scams frequently target older or more vulnerable individuals, younger people have also reported close encounters. For instance, one individual received repeated calls from an unidentified number before finally answering. The caller, claiming to be from a local sheriff’s department, had the person’s full name and address and insisted that they had failed to appear for jury duty, threatening multiple citations.

Legitimate jury summonses are always delivered by mail, not through threatening phone calls. If you receive a suspicious call regarding missed jury duty, it is essential to remain calm and take steps to protect your personal information.

First and foremost, do not trust any unknown caller, especially if they demand immediate payment. Legitimate authorities will never request payment over the phone, particularly not through gift cards, wire transfers, or cryptocurrency. If someone threatens you with arrest or legal action unless you pay immediately, it is almost certainly a scam. Hang up and contact your local court or police department using an official number.

It is also advisable to fact-check any suspicious calls. Court summonses are always sent via mail, not over the phone. Even if the caller possesses personal information such as your name or address, that does not lend them credibility. Scammers often utilize leaked or publicly available data to appear convincing.

Exercise caution even if the scam is delivered through text messages or emails. Avoid clicking on any suspicious links, as they can install malware on your device and compromise your personal data. The best way to protect yourself from malicious links is to have robust antivirus software installed on all your devices. This software can alert you to phishing emails and ransomware scams, safeguarding your personal information and digital assets.

It is important to recognize that your data is already accessible online, often due to old social media profiles or past data breaches. This is how scammers gather enough personal details to sound legitimate. Investing in a data removal service can help minimize your digital footprint by removing your information from people-search sites and data brokers.

While no service can guarantee complete removal of your data from the internet, a data removal service is a wise investment. These services actively monitor and systematically erase your personal information from numerous websites, providing peace of mind and reducing the risk of scammers cross-referencing data from breaches with information they might find on the dark web.

If you receive a scam call, it is crucial to report it to local law enforcement or your country’s fraud reporting agency. After hanging up, block the number on your phone and report it. Many carriers allow you to forward scam texts to 7726 (SPAM). Additionally, apps like Truecaller and Hiya, as well as built-in features like Google Call Screen or Silence Unknown Callers on iPhones, can help detect and block fraudulent calls automatically.

Older adults are frequent targets of these scams, so it is essential to sit down with parents, grandparents, or neighbors to explain how these scams work and what to watch for. A simple conversation could prevent a costly mistake.

As scammers become bolder and more convincing, staying informed about the signs of a jury duty phone scam is crucial. Utilizing smart tools like antivirus software and call blockers, along with limiting your digital footprint, can significantly reduce your risk. Empowering yourself and your loved ones with this knowledge is vital in combating these fraudulent schemes.

Scammers are increasingly using hyper-personalized and emotionally charged phone calls instead of relying solely on faceless phishing emails. By impersonating local authorities and referencing civic duties like jury duty, they exploit both fear and a sense of responsibility. This tactic is particularly dangerous because it sounds plausible, drawing on real processes that many individuals may not fully understand.

Do you believe that law enforcement and government agencies are doing enough to educate the public about these scams? Share your thoughts by reaching out to us.

Source: Original article

Communities Show Solidarity With Immigrants in the U.S.

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics, USA 0

Community groups across the U.S. are actively resisting deportation policies and advocating for immigrant rights, emphasizing the vital role immigrants play in the economy.

In response to the Trump administration’s stringent deportation policies, community groups throughout the United States are rallying to advocate for immigrant rights and protections. Their message is clear: “No human being is illegal.”

These powerful slogans resonate deeply within the immigrant rights movement, echoing the sentiments of community activists across the nation. The deportation of immigrants has surged since the Trump administration took office, with reports detailing the shocking deportation of 104 Indians on a military plane in February 2025. To date, nearly 400 Indians have faced deportation.

Over recent months, agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have detained several student activists involved in peaceful protests against the destruction of Gaza. The administration has invoked the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act to deport nearly 300 immigrants to the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT) in El Salvador, a facility notorious for its harsh conditions.

ICE raids have targeted immigrant communities in various towns and cities across America. In Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, local residents banded together to support their neighbors and friends, demanding due process in the face of these aggressive actions.

Organizations dedicated to immigrant rights, along with legal advocates and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), are working tirelessly to halt deportations, and some courts have issued favorable rulings. The current U.S. population of approximately 342 million includes 53.3 million immigrants, with around 15 million classified as undocumented, often referred to disparagingly as illegal immigrants, according to a January report from the Center for Immigration Studies.

Activists are raising critical questions about who truly contributes to the wealth of the U.S. economy and performs the most challenging jobs. Immigrant workers are recognized as the backbone of the economy, a sentiment echoed at a recent seminar titled “Union and Community Activists Unite for Immigrant Rights,” organized by the Boston South Asian Coalition at the Cambridge Community Center in Massachusetts. The discussions held at this event remain relevant as the issues surrounding immigrant rights continue to escalate.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the construction industry employs approximately eight million workers, with 1.6 million of them being immigrants, representing 20% of the workforce. A report from the University of Michigan highlights that in cities like New York, immigrant workers make up 63% of construction workers, with 40% being undocumented. Furthermore, undocumented immigrant workers face a significantly higher incidence of work-related injuries, with rates 30% higher than those of native-born workers.

The agricultural sector also relies heavily on immigrant labor, contributing 0.8% to the GDP, which amounts to $222 billion. The combined agriculture and food-related industries account for 5.5% of the GDP, totaling $1.53 trillion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis in 2023. Remarkably, 73% of farm workers are immigrants, with half of them being undocumented.

In the care economy, which includes roles such as nannies, cleaners, and personal care assistants, an estimated 300,000 workers are undocumented, as reported by the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. David Grabowski, a professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School, noted that foreign-born workers constitute over 30% of non-direct care staff in long-term care facilities, emphasizing their crucial role in maintaining quality care.

The meatpacking industry, known for its hazardous working conditions, employs over 500,000 workers across the country. This sector heavily relies on H-2A and H-2B visa programs to fill jobs, as reported by the American Immigration Council. A 2024 report by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) revealed that 5,486 workers died on the job in 2022, with 1,248 of those fatalities involving Latino workers, 60% of whom were immigrants.

Community leaders and union activists are calling for organized efforts to combat the attacks on immigrants and all workers. Amrita Dani from the Boston Teachers Union emphasized the importance of collective action, stating, “Teachers and other organized workers can and should organize without fear with members of the community.”

She highlighted the legacy of International Workers Day, honoring the millions of immigrants who participated in demonstrations in May 2006. Evan MacKay, a Boston-based labor leader, pointed out that while contracts can secure victories, active enforcement by the workers is essential to ensure that legal agreements translate into real protections.

Heloisa Galvao, Executive Director of the Brazilian Women’s Group in Boston, shared the growing fears within the Brazilian community, where individuals are hesitant to attend doctor’s appointments, go to work, or send their children to school. This panic has resulted in devastating income losses, leading to increased rates of homelessness and food insecurity.

Galvao advocates for collective action to protect immigrant workers and their families, striving to create a just world for all. The rallying cries of “Hum Ladenge aur Aum Jeetenge!” (We will fight and win!) and “Si Si Puede” (Yes, yes, we can!) reflect the determination of union activists and community organizers from diverse backgrounds to ensure the safety and rights of immigrants.

As the fight for immigrant rights continues, it is clear that solidarity among workers and families is essential, regardless of immigration status. The ongoing efforts of community groups and activists highlight the critical role immigrants play in the fabric of American society.

Source: Original article

Labor Day 2025 Marks a Unique Perfect Square Date

Staff ReporterElection, Nation, USA 0

This year’s Labor Day, falling on September 1, 2025, is notable for being a perfect square date, a rarity in the calendar.

Labor Day is a federal holiday in the United States, celebrated on the first Monday of September. It honors the labor movement and recognizes the contributions of American workers to the nation’s growth and achievements. This year, Labor Day will be observed on Monday, September 1, 2025, and it carries a remarkable mathematical distinction.

The year 2025 is significant as it is a perfect square year, expressed mathematically as 2025 = 45 × 45. Even more astonishing is that this year’s Labor Day date, written numerically as 9/1/2025 (or simply 912025), is also a perfect square: 912025 = 955 × 955.

Dates like these are referred to as perfect square dates, a term introduced in 2009. A perfect square date is defined as one in which the full date number, written without separators, equals a perfect square.

In 2009, two perfect square dates occurred: March 5, 2009 (03/05/2009 → 3052009 = 1747 × 1747) and April 1, 2009 (04/01/2009 → 4012009 = 2003 × 2003). Perfect square dates are rare; the 19th and 20th centuries each had only seven. In contrast, the 21st century is abundant with them, featuring 39 in the U.S. date format alone.

2025 stands out as it contains eight perfect square dates, the highest number to occur in any single year this century. These dates include:

January 9 — 01/09/2025

March 22 — 03/22/2025

April 18 — 04/18/2025

June 3 — 06/03/2025

September 1 — 09/01/2025 (Labor Day)

September 27 — 09/27/2025

October 9 — 10/09/2025

October 27 — 10/27/2025

Depending on whether the month and day are single- or double-digit, perfect square dates may appear in six-, seven-, or eight-digit forms. For example, this year’s Labor Day is expressed as 9/1/2025 (six digits) to reveal its square property.

Interestingly, September 1, 2004—written in eight digits as 09/01/2004—was also a perfect square date, since 9012004 = 3002 × 3002. However, in that year, Labor Day fell on September 6, not September 1.

Even more striking is that September 1, 2025, is a perfect square date worldwide. In countries that use the day/month/year format, the date is written as 01/09/2025, which also equals a perfect square: 1092025 = 1045 × 1045. This makes September 1, 2025, a universally recognized perfect square date, valid in both U.S. and international date notations.

The 21st century will contain 43 perfect square dates in the day/month/year system, six of which occur in 2025:

January 9 — 9/1/2025

March 6 — 6/3/2025

May 14 — 14/5/2025

September 1 — 01/09/2025

September 10 — 10/9/2025

September 27 — 27/09/2025

Among these, three dates are universally perfect squares, valid in both systems:

January 9, 2025 — U.S.: 01/09/2025 → 1092025 = 1045 × 1045; World: 9/1/2025 → 912025 = 955 × 955

September 1, 2025 — U.S. Labor Day: 9/1/2025 → 912025 = 955 × 955; World: 01/09/2025 → 1092025 = 1045 × 1045

September 27, 2025 — a truly rare case, as it is an eight-digit perfect square in both formats: U.S.: 09/27/2025 → 9272025 = 3045 × 3045; World: 27/09/2025 → 27092025 = 5205 × 5205.

This year’s Labor Day is not just a holiday but also a mathematical celebration. A perfect square date coinciding with Labor Day—and being valid in both global date systems—is an exceptionally rare event. The next occurrence of such a date will not happen anytime soon.

As you enjoy this year’s holiday, take a moment to appreciate the beautiful alignment of calendars and mathematics that makes Labor Day 2025 truly one of a kind.

Source: Original article

Democratic Representative Jerry Nadler Announces Decision Not to Seek Reelection

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Longtime Democratic Representative Jerrold Nadler has announced he will not seek re-election, concluding a distinguished 34-year career in the U.S. House of Representatives.

U.S. Representative Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat from New York, has confirmed he will not run for re-election next year, marking the end of a notable 34-year tenure in Congress. Throughout his career, Nadler has been recognized as a leading voice for liberal advocacy on a variety of issues.

In an interview with the New York Times, Nadler, 78, expressed his belief in the need for generational change within the Democratic Party. “Watching the Biden thing really said something about the necessity for generational change in the party, and I think I want to respect that,” he stated.

Nadler’s decision comes after a significant shift in leadership dynamics within the House, as he was compelled to relinquish his position as chair of the House Judiciary Committee at the start of the current term. This change was largely due to the emergence of a younger, more energetic colleague who was poised to take over the role.

Throughout his career, Nadler has been a vocal critic of former President Donald Trump, often warning fellow Democrats about Trump’s leadership style. Their contentious relationship dates back to the 1980s, particularly concerning various Manhattan development projects. “I’m not saying we should change over the entire party,” Nadler remarked. “But I think a certain amount of change is very helpful, especially when we face the challenge of Trump and his incipient fascism.”

Nadler played a pivotal role in the impeachment proceedings against Trump, successfully guiding articles of impeachment through his committee in 2019. While he did not specify potential successors, he acknowledged that several candidates might vie for his seat. According to a source familiar with his thinking, Nadler is likely to support Micah Lasher, a member of the New York State Assembly who represents parts of the Upper West Side, should he choose to run.

Despite his impending departure, Nadler expressed confidence in the Democratic Party’s prospects for regaining control of the House in the upcoming elections. “Then you can cut the reign of terror in half,” he said, alluding to the current political climate.

In a social media post, New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani lauded Nadler as a champion of progressivism. “For more than 30 years, when New Yorkers needed a champion, we have turned to Jerry Nadler – and he has delivered for us time and again,” Mamdani wrote. “Few leaders can claim to have made such an impact on the fabric of our city.”

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, also a Democrat from New York, praised Nadler’s legacy, calling him a “relentless fighter for justice, civil rights and liberties and the fundamental promise of equality for all.” Jeffries highlighted Nadler’s efforts following the September 11 attacks, noting his dedication to securing care and support for New York City and its residents during a time of crisis.

“As Dean of the New York delegation, Congressman Nadler has been a dear friend and valued mentor to myself and so many others throughout the People’s House,” Jeffries added. “Jerry’s years of leadership have earned him a spot among our nation’s greatest public servants. He will be deeply missed by the House Democratic Caucus next term, and we wish him and his family the very best in this new chapter.”

Source: Original article

Punjab Police Arrest Three in JeM-Linked Cab Driver Murder Case

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, Security 0

Punjab Police have arrested three individuals linked to Jaish-e-Mohammad for the abduction and murder of a cab driver in Mohali, recovering weapons and the vehicle involved in the crime.

In a significant development, the Punjab Police announced on Monday the dismantling of a terror module associated with Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM). This operation led to the arrest of three individuals from Jammu and Kashmir, who are accused of abducting and murdering a cab driver in Nayagaon, Mohali.

The investigation was initiated following the forcible snatching of a taxi belonging to Anil Kumar in Kharar. Kumar’s sudden disappearance, coupled with the deactivation of his mobile phones, raised immediate concerns. This prompted the Sas Nagar Police to launch a thorough investigation, mobilizing multiple teams to track down the suspects.

Through swift and coordinated action, law enforcement successfully apprehended all three accused. The police reported that the vehicle used in the crime, along with a .32 bore pistol, has been recovered. During interrogation, the suspects admitted to shooting Kumar following an altercation and subsequently disposing of his body in the Mohali area. Intensive search operations are currently underway to locate the remains.

Among those arrested is Sahil Bashir, who has a complicated criminal history. He is wanted in connection with a case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Arms Act in Handwara, Jammu and Kashmir. His brother, Aijaz Ahmad, has previously been arrested for possessing a cache of weapons and materials linked to JeM. Both men have been identified as Over Ground Workers (OGWs) for the Pakistan-based terror organization.

A spokesperson for the Punjab Police stated, “Investigations are ongoing to dismantle the entire network and ensure that no anti-national elements find a foothold in Punjab.”

The swift action by the Punjab Police highlights their commitment to combating terrorism and ensuring the safety of citizens in the region.

Source: Original article

Former FBI Director Robert Mueller Diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease

Staff ReporterHealth, Politics, USA 0

Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, a condition revealed by his family in a recent statement.

Robert Mueller, the former FBI director and special counsel known for leading the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, has been diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease. His family disclosed this information in a statement to the New York Times on Sunday.

Mueller, who is 81 years old, received his diagnosis in the summer of 2021. Following this, he retired from public life at the end of that year after a brief period of teaching law. According to the family statement, he taught at his alma mater during the fall semesters of both 2021 and 2022 before fully retiring.

“Bob was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease in the summer of 2021. He retired from the practice of law at the end of that year. He taught at his law school alma mater during the fall of both 2021 and 2022, and he retired at the end of 2022,” the statement read.

In light of his health issues, the House Oversight Committee had previously subpoenaed Mueller to testify regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. However, lawmakers withdrew this request upon learning about his health struggles. A source familiar with the situation informed Fox News Digital that the committee “learned that Mr. Mueller has health issues that preclude him from being able to testify.”

This decision to withdraw the subpoena occurred prior to the public disclosure of Mueller’s Parkinson’s diagnosis. Reports indicate that he has been experiencing difficulties with speech and mobility, which have impacted his ability to comply with congressional requests.

Mueller served as FBI director from 2001 to 2013, a period during which he oversaw the bureau’s investigation into Epstein in 2007. His involvement in high-profile cases has made him a notable figure in American politics and law enforcement.

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, a Republican from Kentucky, has emphasized the importance of this period in his inquiry, referencing a draft indictment against Epstein that was ultimately set aside in favor of a controversial non-prosecution agreement.

Mueller’s family has requested that their privacy be respected during this challenging time.

According to Fox News Digital, Mueller’s health issues have raised concerns about his ability to participate in legal proceedings and public testimony.

Source: Original article

Modi Urges SCO Members to Reject Double Standards on Terrorism

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, USA 0

Prime Minister Narendra Modi emphasized the need for unity against terrorism and called for global reforms during the 25th Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Summit in Tianjin.

New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the 25th Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit in Tianjin on Monday, delivering a clear message regarding the fight against terrorism. He urged member states to abandon selective approaches, emphasizing that such tactics are no longer acceptable.

During his address, Modi outlined India’s three guiding pillars for the SCO: security, connectivity, and opportunity. He also advocated for reforms within the organization and on a global scale.

“Terrorism is not just a threat to the security of any one country; it is a shared challenge for all humanity. No country, no society, no citizen can consider themselves safe from it,” Modi stated, addressing an audience that included prominent world leaders such as Chinese Premier Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

According to official sources, the atmosphere among the three leaders was notably warm, reflecting mutual respect during the summit.

Modi referenced the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, India, highlighting its impact on the nation. “In this hour of grief, I thank those friends who stood by us. This attack was not just an assault on India’s conscience—it was an open challenge to every nation and every person who believes in humanity,” he remarked.

The Prime Minister called for clarity and unity among SCO members, insisting, “We must say clearly, in one voice, that no double standards on terrorism will be acceptable. We must oppose it in every colour, every form. This is our duty to humanity.” He also noted India’s leadership role in a joint SCO operation against al-Qaeda-linked groups this year, emphasizing the need for deeper coordination in combating radicalization and terror financing.

In discussing connectivity, Modi asserted that stronger links can foster both trust and commerce. He cited the Chabahar Port and the International North-South Transport Corridor, stating, “Connectivity that bypasses sovereignty loses trust and meaning.” He stressed that all projects must respect sovereignty and territorial integrity, as mandated by the SCO charter.

On the topic of opportunity, Modi reflected on India’s 2023 presidency, which brought issues such as start-ups, digital inclusion, traditional medicine, youth empowerment, and shared Buddhist heritage to the forefront of the SCO agenda. He proposed the establishment of a Civilizational Dialogue Forum to highlight the art, literature, and traditions of member states.

Linking this broader vision to India’s domestic agenda of “Reform, Perform and Transform,” Modi noted that the country has turned challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic and global economic shocks into new opportunities. He invited SCO members to engage with India’s reform-driven growth.

Modi welcomed the SCO’s decision to create new centers aimed at combating organized crime, drug trafficking, and cybersecurity. He stressed that the organization should also advocate for global institutional reforms. With the 80th anniversary of the United Nations approaching, he called for collaborative efforts, stating, “The aspirations of the Global South cannot be constrained within outdated frameworks. We cannot show the multicoloured dreams of the new generation on a black-and-white screen. The screen must change.”

In closing, Modi framed the SCO as a guide for multilateralism and an inclusive world order, congratulating Kyrgyzstan’s President Sadyr Japarov on assuming the chairmanship of the grouping.

Source: Original article

Rahul Gandhi to Conclude Voter Adhikar Yatra with Padyatra in Patna

Staff ReporterPolitics, Politics 0

Rahul Gandhi will conclude his Voter Adhikar Yatra with a significant padyatra in Patna, emphasizing voter rights and alleging electoral misconduct.

Patna: Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and a prominent Congress leader, is set to commence a padyatra in Patna on Monday. This event marks the conclusion of his Voter Adhikar Yatra, which has spanned 25 districts over the past 15 days and covered a distance of approximately 1,300 kilometers. The yatra has focused on allegations of electoral misconduct, specifically termed as “vote chori” or vote theft.

The Voter Adhikar Yatra began on August 17 in Sasaram, Bihar, with the participation of key leaders from the Mahagatbandhan coalition. Throughout its course, the yatra traversed various districts, including Aurangabad, Gaya, Nawada, Sheikhpura, Lakhisarai, Munger, Bhagalpur, Darbhanga, Purnea, Supaul, Madhubani, Sitamarhi, Motihari, Bettiah, Saran, and Bhojpur.

The padyatra scheduled for Monday has been aptly named “Gandhi se Ambedkar.” It will commence from the Mahatma Gandhi statue at Gandhi Maidan, where Rahul Gandhi and other prominent leaders from the Mahagatbandhan, including Tejashwi Yadav of the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), Mukesh Sahni of the Vikashsheel Insan Party (VIP), and Deepankar Bhattacharya from the Left parties, will pay floral tributes to Mahatma Gandhi.

Following the tribute, the procession will proceed along S.P. Verma Road, Dak Bungalow Chauraha, Kotwali Thana, Nehru Path, and Income Tax Chauraha, ultimately reaching Baba Saheb Ambedkar Park near the Patna High Court. At the park, the leaders will pay homage to Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.

The padyatra will culminate in a public address focusing on the alleged vote theft, a central theme of the Congress and Mahagatbandhan’s messaging during the yatra. Over the past two weeks, the coalition has aimed to highlight what they describe as collusion between the Election Commission and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) regarding electoral integrity.

In a strategic shift, the Congress party opted for a padyatra instead of a mega rally, allowing for broader participation from various leaders within the INDIA bloc. Earlier, Congress general secretary K.C. Venugopal had announced plans for a large rally on September 1 to address the issue of “vote chors,” or vote thieves.

Pawan Khera, a Congress leader and Chairman of the media and publicity department, emphasized that Gandhi’s yatra has taken on the character of a religious pilgrimage, uniting people of diverse faiths in the common cause of protecting their voting rights. He stated, “On September 1, it will conclude with a procession in Patna in which our leaders will march from Gandhi Maidan to Babasaheb Ambedkar’s statue. It will not be the end, but the beginning of a new yatra towards protecting our democracy.” Khera also expressed confidence that “lakhs of people will participate in the padyatra.”

In preparation for the event, the streets of Patna have been adorned with posters from the Congress and other Mahagatbandhan parties, and the organization has made extensive arrangements to ensure the success of the yatra.

As the padyatra approaches, it is clear that the Congress party is mobilizing significant grassroots support, aiming to galvanize public sentiment around the issues of electoral integrity and voter rights.

Source: Original article

Israel Strikes Yemen, Eliminating Houthi Prime Minister and Officials

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics 0

The Israeli Air Force has successfully eliminated Houthi Prime Minister Ahmed Al-Rahawi and several senior officials in a targeted airstrike in Yemen, marking a significant escalation in regional tensions.

The Israeli Air Force conducted a targeted airstrike in Yemen on Thursday, resulting in the death of Houthi Prime Minister Ahmed Al-Rahawi and other senior officials. This operation was part of a broader strategy by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to address perceived threats from the Houthi regime.

In a statement released on social media, the IDF confirmed the elimination of Al-Rahawi, describing him as a key figure in the Houthi terrorist regime. The military emphasized that the strike was aimed at a location where officials were responsible for military operations and the advancement of terror actions against Israel.

The IDF noted that the airstrike was made possible through rapid intelligence operations, indicating a swift operational cycle that unfolded within a few hours. This marks the second time within a week that Israel has targeted Houthi positions in Yemen.

On Sunday, Israel had previously struck Yemen’s capital, Sanaa, in response to missile attacks launched by the Houthis. That attack resulted in the deaths of six individuals and left 86 others injured, according to reports from the Houthi Health Ministry.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz, who was present in the IDF central command during the latest operation, issued a stark warning to the Houthis. He stated, “As we warned the Houthis in Yemen: ‘After the plague of darkness comes the plague of the death.’ Whoever raises a hand against Israel, their hand will be cut off.”

The IDF has previously accused the Houthis of operating under Iranian direction, asserting that their actions undermine regional stability and threaten global navigation. The recent airstrikes were launched after Israel intercepted two drones originating from Yemen, coinciding with a speech by Houthi leader Abdul-Malik Badreddin al-Houthi.

Despite the ongoing conflict, reports indicate that al-Houthi’s speech continued uninterrupted during the airstrike. The tensions between Israel and the Houthis have escalated over the past two years, particularly following Hamas’ attacks on October 7, which prompted a series of retaliatory actions from various groups, including the Houthis.

In the wake of Hamas’ actions, the Houthis have threatened to strike Israel, launching missiles and drones that were intercepted by U.S. forces stationed aboard the USS Carney. The ongoing support from the Houthis to Hamas has further complicated the already volatile situation in the region.

As the conflict continues to evolve, the IDF has reiterated its commitment to neutralizing threats against Israeli civilians, signaling that further military actions may be anticipated in the near future.

According to Reuters, the situation remains fluid, with the potential for additional escalations as both sides navigate the complexities of regional power dynamics.

Source: Original article

Chicago Mayor Says Police Will Not Collaborate with National Guard

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has signed an executive order preventing local police from collaborating with National Guard troops or federal agents amid threats of deployment by President Trump.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, a Democrat, took decisive action on Saturday by signing an executive order that prohibits the city’s police officers from collaborating with National Guard troops or federal agents. This move comes in response to President Donald Trump’s threats to deploy these forces to the Windy City.

During a news conference attended by city leaders, Johnson emphasized the intent behind the order. “This executive order makes it emphatically clear that this president is not going to come in and deputize our police department,” he stated.

The executive order clarifies that while Chicago police will continue to enforce state and local laws, they will not engage in joint operations with the National Guard or federal agents. This includes activities such as patrols, arrests, immigration enforcement, and other law enforcement actions.

Johnson expressed his commitment to protecting civil liberties and the community, saying, “We will protect our Constitution, we will protect our city, and we will protect our people.” He voiced strong opposition to the idea of military presence in the city, stating, “We do not want to see tanks in our streets. We do not want to see families ripped apart. We do not want grandmothers thrown into the back of unmarked vans. We don’t want to see homeless Chicagoans harassed or disappeared by federal agents.”

The order also mandates that city police officers wear their official uniforms, clearly identify themselves, and adhere to body camera protocols. Officers are instructed not to wear masks, ensuring they can be easily distinguished from any federal operations.

Johnson reiterated, “The Chicago Police Department will not collaborate with military personnel on police patrols or civil immigration enforcement. We will not have our police officers who are working hard every single day to drive down crime deputized to do traffic stops and checkpoints for the president.”

The executive order highlights concerns regarding the deployment of federal military forces in Chicago without local consent, stating that such actions “undermine democratic norms, violate the City’s sovereignty, threaten civil liberties, and risk escalating violence rather than securing the peace.”

This executive order arises amid ongoing tensions between Johnson, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, and Trump regarding the potential deployment of National Guard troops to combat crime in Chicago. Johnson has pointed to recent data indicating a decline in violent crime, with homicides and robberies decreasing by over 30% and shootings dropping by nearly 40% in the past year.

Pritzker has also issued warnings to Trump, asserting that any federal deployment without the state’s request would be “unconstitutional” and “un-American.”

In response to the Democratic leaders’ statements, Trump criticized both Pritzker and Johnson, labeling Pritzker as “incompetent” and Johnson as “no better.”

The White House dismissed Johnson’s executive order, suggesting that Democrats were politicizing efforts to address crime. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson stated, “If these Democrats focused on fixing crime in their own cities instead of doing publicity stunts to criticize the President, their communities would be much safer.”

In light of the escalating situation, Johnson mentioned that he is considering all legal and legislative measures to prevent federal intervention, including the possibility of lawsuits. “We will use the courts if that’s necessary,” he affirmed.

Historically, previous deployments of the National Guard to Chicago were coordinated with local officials. While the president has the authority to deploy troops, U.S. law limits this power, though there are no restrictions on sending ICE agents or other federal law enforcement officers.

Trump’s threats to deploy troops to Chicago follow his recent actions to increase federal law enforcement presence in Washington, D.C., as part of efforts to combat crime. Hundreds of federal agents and National Guard troops have been stationed in D.C. to address safety concerns.

As tensions continue to rise, the implications of Johnson’s executive order and the potential federal response remain to be seen.

Source: Original article

Body of Israeli Hostage Held for Nearly 700 Days in Gaza Recovered

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics 0

The remains of Ilan Weiss, an Israeli hostage held for nearly 700 days in Gaza, have been recovered, marking a bittersweet moment for his family and community.

The Israeli military announced on Friday that the remains of Ilan Weiss, who was held captive in the Gaza Strip for 693 days, have been recovered. This operation was conducted jointly by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Israeli Security Agency.

Weiss, a resident of Kibbutz Be’eri, was taken hostage during the October 7 Massacre when he left his home to join the kibbutz emergency response team. The IDF confirmed that he was murdered and kidnapped by Hamas during this attack.

His wife, Shiri, 54, and their daughter, Noga, 19, were also taken hostage but were released as part of a ceasefire agreement in November 2023. The recovery of Weiss’s body comes alongside the identification process of another Israeli individual whose remains were also found on the same day, according to reports from The Associated Press.

Rubi Chen, a father who believes his son is still missing in Gaza, expressed his feelings regarding the recovery of Weiss’s body. “It’s a bittersweet moment that the Weiss family is reunited with their loved one, even though he’s coming back not as they would have wanted,” he stated. Chen’s family has received intelligence suggesting that his son, Itay, did not survive the October 7 attack, but Hamas has not provided any information regarding his current status.

The Israeli Hostages and Missing Families Forum described Ilan Weiss as a devoted family man who was humble, principled, and dedicated to his daughters. “He loved hosting guests, tending his garden, and enjoying a beer. On weekends, he would go mountain biking with his brother-in-law, Gil Boyum, who was also killed during the attack,” the forum noted.

As of Friday, there are still 48 hostages believed to be held in Gaza, with 20 of them thought to be alive, according to The Times of Israel.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog extended his condolences to the Weiss family and the community of Kibbutz Be’eri following the recovery of Ilan’s remains. He praised Weiss for his courage and noble spirit during the attack, stating, “In his death, he gave life. And ever since, his family has shown extraordinary strength in their struggle for his return.”

Herzog condemned the actions of Hamas, calling them crimes against humanity, and emphasized the need for the international community to take moral action. “We will not rest until every one of them is brought home, the living to the loving embrace of their families, and the fallen to be laid to rest in dignity. Every last one,” he asserted.

Source: Original article

Indian Army Raises 72-Foot Tricolour at Baramulla’s Cheeta Post

Staff ReporterNation, Politics 0

The Indian Army celebrated Hajipeer Day by hoisting a 72-foot national flag at Cheeta Post, Baramulla’s highest peak, with local community members in attendance.

On Hajipeer Day, the Indian Army’s Dagger Division proudly raised a 72-foot national flag at Cheeta Post, the highest peak in Baramulla district, North Kashmir, situated at an altitude of 7,000 feet.

The ceremony, organized in collaboration with the Flag Foundation of India, attracted a large crowd of locals, including schoolchildren and community leaders. Senior Army officials, including the Corps Commander and the General Officer Commanding (GOC) of the 19 Infantry Division, were present to commemorate this significant occasion.

This initiative is part of the Army’s ongoing efforts to strengthen ties with local communities and promote a shared sense of national pride and unity in the region.

Ashim Kohli, CEO of the Flag Foundation of India, addressed the gathering and highlighted the increasing wave of patriotism in the Valley. “It’s a significant change. What we once dreamed is now turning into reality. People in Kashmir are themselves approaching us for national flags. This surge of patriotism will help build stronger ties between Kashmiris and the Army,” he stated.

Earlier this month, the Indian Army also hoisted the national flag on a large pontoon structure floating in the middle of Dal Lake in Srinagar. This tricolour, visible from various parts of the city, was installed with support from the Flag Foundation and quickly became a symbol of peace and unity.

Such initiatives have garnered widespread support among the local population, with increasing participation in national day celebrations and public outreach events led by the armed forces. The commitment to fostering community relations and promoting national pride continues to resonate throughout the region.

According to The Sunday Guardian, the event at Cheeta Post marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing efforts to bridge connections between the Indian Army and the local populace.

Source: Original article

NFU Exclusion Highlights Bureaucratic Challenges for India’s Military Veterans

Staff ReporterNation India, Politics 0

Exclusion from Non-Functional Upgradation (NFU) exacerbates pay disparities between military and civilian personnel, undermining the morale and dignity of India’s Armed Forces veterans.

In recent months, the debate surrounding Non-Functional Upgradation (NFU) has resurfaced as a contentious issue within India’s military community. Veterans’ organizations have even announced plans for a mass mobilization in Delhi in July 2025 to advocate for NFU, One Rank One Pension (OROP), and address service anomalies.

Regardless of whether these calls for demonstration materialize, the very fact that ex-servicemen feel compelled to rally underscores the gravity of the situation. NFU has evolved into a prominent symbol of the perceived downgrading of the Armed Forces in terms of status, dignity, and recognition.

Understanding NFU and Its Importance to Soldiers

NFU was introduced following the Sixth Central Pay Commission to tackle career stagnation in civil services. Under this scheme, officers in most Group A services receive automatic pay upgrades after a specified number of years, aligned with the progression of their Indian Administrative Service (IAS) batchmates. The aim was to alleviate frustration stemming from limited promotions due to vacancy constraints.

However, despite the scheme being extended to 53 civilian services and later to the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs), the Armed Forces—characterized by the steepest pyramidal structure—were excluded. The irony is stark: Armed Forces officers, who face the highest attrition rates, are denied a benefit granted to civilian counterparts who enjoy more predictable career paths.

The Seventh Central Pay Commission highlighted this anomaly, noting that the denial of NFU “undermined status and morale” within the military. Parliamentary Standing Committees have echoed these concerns, warning of potential long-term risks to cohesion within the Armed Forces. Yet, successive governments have resisted rectifying this issue.

Ongoing Legal Battles

The NFU matter has been litigated repeatedly since 2008. Both the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) and the Delhi High Court have recognized the inequity at different times. The Delhi High Court even described the denial of NFU to uniformed services, while granting it to CAPFs, as “untenable.”

Despite these rulings, the government’s approach has been to contest every decision. As of 2025, over 3,000 service-related appeals concerning pay and pension were pending from the Ministry of Defence before the Supreme Court. In July 2025, the Court criticized the practice of “dragging armed forces personnel into unnecessary litigation,” urging a policy-level resolution instead of protracted courtroom battles.

Recent AFT petitions, such as OA 1893/2023 and OA 724/2025, have sought reconsideration of NFU parity. Others, like OA 2894/2023, have raised broader questions regarding post-service benefits, highlighting the deep connection between NFU and veterans’ long-term welfare. Unfortunately, outcomes remain mired in delays, technical dismissals, or appeals.

Legal experts have documented this anomaly, recalling that in 2019, the Supreme Court upheld NFU for CAPFs, explicitly rejecting the government’s argument that command structures would be compromised. If this rationale applies to paramilitary organizations with strict hierarchies, why does it not extend to the Armed Forces? This question remains unanswered in policy discussions.

The Costs of Resistance

The government’s resistance to NFU parity incurs significant costs, both in terms of morale and financial resources. Litigation alone costs crores each year in legal fees. A senior former judge recently remarked that more has been spent on fighting soldiers in court than would have been necessary to resolve many of these anomalies.

Salary progression data reveals widening gaps. Under projected scales for the forthcoming Eighth Pay Commission, civilian Group A officers with NFU are expected to earn between ₹1.16 lakh and ₹5.8 lakh per month, depending on their grade. In contrast, Armed Forces officers of equivalent seniority remain significantly behind. This disparity affects not only salaries but also pensions, status, and relative parity in official forums.

The governance implications are striking. NFU was intended to alleviate stagnation; instead, by excluding those facing the steepest pyramids, it has entrenched inequity.

Veterans’ Voices and Public Sentiment

Calls for collective mobilization, such as the planned July 2025 protest in Delhi, underscore the deep-seated anger within the veteran community. Even if such demonstrations do not occur on a large scale, the repeated threats of public protest highlight a breakdown in trust between the military community and the state.

Veterans from all three services frequently refer to the denial of NFU as “degradation.” Organizations like the Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement (IESM) have initiated petitions and campaigns to draw attention to the morale costs associated with persistent inequity.

This issue is not merely symbolic. Officers and jawans serving on the frontlines are acutely aware of the disparities. When their CAPF counterparts deployed in similar environments enjoy benefits denied to soldiers, resentment is inevitable.

Operational and Strategic Implications

This situation extends beyond financial concerns. Morale is a strategic asset. From Siachen to Ladakh, or during operations like Sindoor, the ability to endure and fight relies not only on equipment but also on the belief that one’s service is valued by the state.

Military psychologists worldwide emphasize that dissatisfaction stemming from career stagnation and status erosion contributes to stress, attrition, and workforce disengagement. The stakes are not merely financial; they encompass national security. A military that feels undervalued risks becoming less motivated at a time when India faces significant external challenges.

International Comparisons

In contrast, peer democracies such as the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Israel maintain systems where the military enjoys either pay parity or, in many cases, preferential treatment compared to civilian personnel. The principle is straightforward: those who accept unlimited liability for the state deserve equity in return.

India’s situation stands as an outlier. By privileging its bureaucracy while resisting even parity for its Armed Forces, it has created a unique imbalance that is difficult to justify on an international scale.

A Pattern of Downgrading

The denial of NFU cannot be viewed in isolation. It is part of a broader pattern of decisions and policies that collectively erode the dignity of military service. Recent changes, such as the 2023 Entitlement Rules redefining disability pensions, ongoing litigation over OROP arrears, and the rising status of CAPFs compared to the Armed Forces, contribute to this trend.

Time for Resolution

To address the NFU anomaly, the government should establish a high-level committee with armed forces representation to review and resolve disparities. Timely implementation of NFU parity, as recommended by pay commissions and supported by legal observations, can restore morale and integrity within the forces. Proactive policy action, rather than continued litigation, is essential for a lasting resolution.

India’s soldiers are not seeking privilege, only parity. A nation that demands sacrifice in war must be prepared to honor dignity in peace. Denying NFU may seem to save money or preserve bureaucratic privilege in the short term, but in the long run, it undermines morale, justice, and national security.

The government must act decisively to rectify the NFU imbalance by establishing policy parity between the Armed Forces and other Group A services. Creating a transparent, equitable framework for pay progression would directly support morale and operational effectiveness. Early resolution will demonstrate respect for service and strengthen the foundation of the Republic.

Source: Original article

Top Senate Republican Proposes Rule Change for Trump Nominee Confirmations

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso is prepared to invoke the nuclear option to expedite the confirmation of President Trump’s nominees amid ongoing Democratic opposition.

Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., has signaled his readiness to employ the nuclear option to overcome the Democratic blockade of President Donald Trump’s nominees. As Senate Republicans prepared to leave Washington, D.C., for their home states, they were close to reaching an agreement with their Democratic counterparts to advance numerous non-controversial appointments. However, those discussions collapsed after Trump rejected further negotiations tied to funding demands from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

Currently, there are 145 nominations pending on the Senate’s executive calendar, a number that is expected to increase when the Senate reconvenes. Lawmakers are set to return on Tuesday, and Barrasso is eager to address the nomination impasse immediately. He has been actively engaging in a public pressure campaign, including writing an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal that directly criticizes Schumer.

In an interview with Fox News Digital, Barrasso expressed his determination to see Trump’s nominees confirmed, stating, “We need to either get a lot of cooperation from the Democrats, or we’re going to have to roll over them with changes of the rules that we’re going to be able to do in a unilateral way, as well as President Trump making recess appointments.”

However, Senate Democrats, under Schumer’s leadership, are unlikely to cooperate. In response to Barrasso’s remarks, Schumer asserted that “historically bad nominees deserve a historic level of scrutiny by Senate Democrats.” Barrasso countered, pointing out that Schumer’s criticism stems solely from the fact that the nominees were put forward by Trump. “That is his sole criteria for which these people are being gone after and filibustered,” Barrasso said, noting that many nominees have bipartisan support.

Utilizing the nuclear option would enable Republicans to modify the confirmation process without Democratic assistance. However, this approach could hinder future negotiations on important legislative items that would require bipartisan support to advance past the Senate filibuster. Barrasso, undeterred by the potential consequences, indicated that the nominees under consideration are primarily for sub-Cabinet level positions and ambassadorships.

Discussions are ongoing regarding potential changes to the confirmation process, including adjustments to debate time and criteria for expedited nominations. Additionally, the possibility of allowing Trump to make recess appointments is under consideration, which would necessitate the Senate going into recess.

Barrasso highlighted the inefficiencies of the current process, noting that it takes three hours to conduct a single nomination vote, which significantly hampers legislative productivity. “When you take a look at this right now, it takes a 30-minute roll-call vote to get on cloture, and then two hours of debate time, and then another 30-minute roll-call vote,” he explained. “That’s three hours, and it’s time when you can’t do legislation, you can’t do any of the other things.”

As Congress prepares to return, Barrasso acknowledged the pressing need to address the backlog of nominations, particularly given the looming deadline to fund the government by September 30. He emphasized that the limited time available for the nominations process necessitates a rules change to expedite confirmations.

“This backlog is going to worsen this traffic jam at the Schumer toll booth,” Barrasso warned. “So, we are going to do something, because this cannot stand.”

Source: Original article

Mary Kay Transitions Iconic Pink Cadillac to Fully Electric Model

Staff ReporterBusiness, Politics 0

The iconic Mary Kay pink Cadillac is transitioning to electric mobility with the introduction of the Cadillac Optiq, exclusively available to the company’s top sales performers.

Mary Kay Inc. is making a significant shift in its iconic brand by introducing a fully electric version of its legendary pink Cadillac. The new Cadillac Optiq, wrapped in a custom “pink pearl” finish, will be available exclusively to the top 1% of the company’s sales force.

This transition marks a pivotal moment for the brand, which has a rich history dating back nearly 60 years. The company’s founder, Mary Kay Ash, faced gender discrimination when she was denied a car purchase without a man’s signature. This experience fueled her determination to create a legacy that empowers women through entrepreneurship and sales.

In a recent press release, CEO Ryan Rogers, who is also the grandson of Mary Kay Ash, emphasized the significance of this move. “With the introduction of the all-electric OPTIQ, we’re honoring that iconic legacy while driving into a transformative future—one grounded in our commitment to sustainability and dedication to inspiring and celebrating the achievements of our independent sales force for generations to come,” he stated.

The shift to electric vehicles (EVs) is not merely a change in the type of car being offered; it represents a broader shift in mindset. The new Cadillac Optiq signifies that luxury, reward, and eco-consciousness can coexist without compromise. The pink Cadillacs have long been symbols of achievement and recognition within the Mary Kay community, and this electric version aims to uphold those values while embracing modern sustainability practices.

Only the top 1% of Mary Kay’s sales force qualifies for this prestigious vehicle, which is not given lightly. Recipients have the option to choose a $900 monthly bonus instead, but approximately 90% opt for the car. The exclusivity of these vehicles is further enhanced by their two-year leasing period. Once the lease ends, the cars are returned and repainted to their original factory color, making a true pink Cadillac a rare sight outside of Mary Kay circles.

As the automotive industry evolves, the introduction of the electric Cadillac highlights a significant trend: EVs are no longer limited to tech-savvy early adopters or urban commuters. They are now making their way into industries steeped in tradition and glamour, showcasing how companies can maintain their legacy while embracing innovation.

This move by Mary Kay is not just a marketing strategy; it aligns the brand with modern values while honoring its founder’s pioneering spirit. The decision to go electric in such a distinctive and eye-catching shade of pink is a refreshing approach to sustainability, demonstrating that style and eco-friendliness can indeed go hand in hand.

As legacy brands like Mary Kay integrate electric vehicles into their offerings, it raises questions about how this will influence attitudes toward sustainability in industries traditionally rooted in conventional practices. The electric Cadillac serves as a testament to the potential for change, encouraging other companies to consider similar transitions.

In conclusion, the introduction of the electric Cadillac Optiq represents a bold step forward for Mary Kay, blending its rich history with a commitment to a sustainable future. This initiative not only honors the legacy of Mary Kay Ash but also sets a precedent for other brands in the industry.

Source: Original article

Russia Attributes Iran Nuclear Crisis to Trump, Criticizes E3 Diplomacy

Staff ReporterConflict, Diplomacy, Politics 0

Russia blames the U.S. withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal for Tehran’s non-compliance, as tensions escalate and the E3 nations move to reimpose UN sanctions.

Russia and China have proposed extending the timeline of the Iran nuclear deal amid rising tensions over Tehran’s violations of uranium enrichment protocols and ongoing international sanctions.

On Thursday, Russia criticized former President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran, asserting that Washington is responsible for Tehran’s failure to comply with the international treaty. This statement came shortly after the United Kingdom, France, and Germany—collectively known as the E3—alerted the UN Security Council that they had activated the snapback mechanism to reimpose severe UN sanctions on Iran within 30 days due to its non-compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

“The United States abandoned the JCPOA, and since then the situation started to deteriorate,” Dmitry Polyanskiy, Russia’s UN Ambassador, stated on Thursday. He emphasized the importance of recognizing the root cause of the issue, referring to Trump’s 2018 decision to withdraw the U.S. from the JCPOA over alleged Iranian violations.

While Trump has consistently claimed that Iran was breaching the agreement, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and other JCPOA signatories have maintained that there was no evidence of Iran expanding its nuclear program until 2019. This position remains unchanged.

“We all know that the measures that were taken by Iran in terms of uranium enrichment were in response to the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA,” Polyanskiy remarked. “And these measures can easily be reviewed.”

In response to the escalating situation, Russia and China introduced a draft resolution to the UN Security Council on Thursday, seeking to extend the timeline of the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement by six months. This extension would delay the imposition of sanctions on Tehran. However, given Iran’s previous refusal to comply with a similar extension proposed by E3 negotiators in July, it seems unlikely that the U.S., France, or the U.K., as permanent members of the Security Council, will support this initiative.

The U.S. has long urged other signatories to enforce snapback sanctions on Iran for its violations, a capability it lost when it exited the agreement in 2018. Despite clear evidence of Iran’s breaches of the JCPOA—such as accumulating up to 45 times the allowed amount of enriched uranium, operating advanced centrifuges, and denying the IAEA access to its nuclear sites—Polyanskiy claimed that the E3’s recent actions “cannot and should not entail any legal or procedural effect.” He characterized the E3’s move as “a mere escalatory step.”

“Western countries…don’t care about diplomacy; they only care about blackmail, threats, and coercion of independent countries,” he added.

A UK official confirmed on Thursday that efforts to reach a diplomatic resolution with Iran have been ongoing for years. This includes a proposal agreed upon by all JCPOA participants, including Russia and China, in 2022, which Iran ultimately rejected. The official noted that there had been “very intense diplomacy” over the past year, particularly in the last six months and six weeks, but Russia appeared to dismiss these efforts on Thursday.

“The world is at a crossroads,” Polyanskiy stated. “It’s quite clear. One option is peace, diplomacy, and goodwill. Another option is…diplomacy at the barrel of the gun…extortion and blackmail,” he concluded.

The White House did not immediately respond to inquiries from Fox News Digital regarding the situation.

Source: Original article

Former RBI Governor Urjit Patel Appointed Executive Director at IMF

Staff ReporterBusiness, Politics 0

Former Reserve Bank of India Governor Urjit Patel has been appointed as the Executive Director at the International Monetary Fund for a three-year term, succeeding K. Subramanian.

New Delhi: The Indian government announced on Friday the appointment of Urjit Patel, the former Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), as the Executive Director at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a term of three years.

The announcement was made through an official note stating, “The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet has approved the appointment of Dr. Urjit Patel, Economist and Former RBI Governor, to the post of Executive Director (ED) at the International Monetary Fund, for a period of three years with effect from the date of assumption of charge of the post, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.”

In this new role, Patel will represent India and several neighboring countries, including Bangladesh, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka, at the Washington-based global financial institution.

This appointment marks Patel’s return to the IMF, where he began his career in 1990 after earning his Ph.D. He worked on various desks, including those for the United States, India, the Bahamas, and Myanmar, until 1995.

Following his tenure at the IMF, Patel was appointed to the RBI, where he played a crucial advisory role in several key areas, including the development of the debt market, banking sector reforms, pension fund reforms, and the targeting of the real exchange rate.

Patel became the 24th Governor of the RBI in September 2016, succeeding Raghuram Rajan. His tenure was characterized by significant policy interventions, notably the introduction of an inflation-targeting framework and the management of economic challenges following the government’s demonetization initiative in November 2016.

In December 2018, Patel resigned from his position as RBI Governor, citing personal reasons. His resignation followed a public dispute with the government regarding issues of central bank autonomy and surplus reserves.

As Patel steps into his new role at the IMF, his extensive experience in both national and international financial institutions is expected to contribute significantly to the representation of India and its neighboring countries.

Source: Original article

Denver School’s All-Gender Bathrooms Found in Violation of Title IX

Staff ReporterEducation, Politics 0

The U.S. Department of Education has determined that Denver Public Schools violated Title IX by implementing all-gender bathrooms, raising concerns about sex-based discrimination in education.

The U.S. Department of Education announced on Thursday that it found Denver Public Schools in violation of Title IX due to the establishment of all-gender bathrooms. This decision is significant as Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination in educational settings.

The investigation, conducted by the department’s Office for Civil Rights, began in January following the conversion of a girls’ restroom at East High School into an all-gender facility. This change occurred while another restroom on the same floor remained designated for boys. The district stated that the decision was made through a student-led process and emphasized that the all-gender restroom featured 12-foot-tall partitions for privacy and security.

In response to concerns about fairness, the district later added a second all-gender restroom on the same floor. Officials maintained that students would still have access to gender-specific bathrooms as well as single-stall, all-gender restrooms.

The federal government has proposed a resolution that includes four conditions the district must agree to within the next ten days. Failure to comply could result in “imminent enforcement action.” Craig Trainor, the acting assistant secretary of the Office for Civil Rights, stated, “Denver Public Schools violated Title IX and its implementing regulations by converting a sex-segregated restroom designated for girls in East High School to an ‘all-gender’ facility.”

Trainor further noted that the district’s actions have created a hostile environment for students, compromising their safety, privacy, and dignity. He emphasized that while Denver may endorse certain ideologies, it cannot accept federal taxpayer funds while violating Title IX and endangering students.

The proposed resolution requires the district to revert all-gender bathrooms back to sex-designated multi-stall restrooms. Additionally, the district must eliminate any policies that allow students to access bathrooms based on gender identity rather than biological sex. The resolution also calls for the adoption of “biology-based definitions” for the terms “male” and “female” in all Title IX-related policies and practices.

Furthermore, the district is required to issue a memorandum affirming that schools must provide access to bathrooms that protect the privacy, dignity, and safety of students, ensuring comparability for each sex. The memorandum must also clarify that Title IX compliance guarantees that girls are not discriminated against in any educational program or activity.

Fox News Digital reached out to Denver Public Schools for comment on the findings and proposed resolution. Under the Trump administration, federal officials have actively targeted school districts that allow students to use bathrooms or participate in sports teams corresponding to their gender identity. In February, President Trump signed an executive order aimed at blocking transgender girls from competing on sports teams that do not align with their biological sex.

Earlier this week, House Republicans introduced legislation to prohibit transgender girls from using bathrooms or participating in sports teams that correspond with their gender identity rather than their biological sex.

According to Fox News, the ongoing debate over gender identity policies in schools continues to evoke strong opinions and legislative action across the country.

Source: Original article

House Democrats Criticize Trump Administration’s Tariffs on India

Staff ReporterNation, Politics 0

The House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats have condemned President Trump for imposing a 50% tariff on Indian imports, claiming it undermines the U.S.-India relationship and disproportionately targets India over larger buyers like China.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats have voiced strong criticism against U.S. President Donald Trump for his decision to impose a 50% tariff on imports from India. This tariff is reportedly linked to India’s purchase of Russian oil, and the committee argues that it is detrimental to American interests while also jeopardizing the U.S.-India relationship.

In a post shared on X, the committee stated that the tariff is “hurting Americans & sabotaging the US-India relationship in the process,” particularly highlighting the inconsistency of targeting India while larger buyers, such as China, remain unaffected.

The new tariffs took effect on August 27, following an announcement from U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This action is a direct result of President Trump’s Executive Order 14329, which aims to address perceived threats from Russia.

According to a media report referenced by the committee, the decision to impose tariffs exclusively on India raises questions about the administration’s policy direction. The committee remarked, “It’s almost like it’s not about Ukraine at all,” suggesting that the rationale behind the tariffs may not align with the stated goals of supporting Ukraine amid its conflict with Russia.

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection clarified that the new duties were implemented to amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States in accordance with the executive order. These tariffs apply to all Indian products intended for consumption in the U.S. or those withdrawn from warehouses.

As the situation develops, the implications of these tariffs on U.S.-India relations and the broader geopolitical landscape remain to be seen. The committee’s concerns underscore a growing unease regarding the administration’s approach to international trade and foreign policy.

Source: Original article

Senate Approves Significant Funding for Immigration Enforcement and Deportation

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

The U.S. Senate has approved a budget reconciliation bill that allocates unprecedented funding for immigration enforcement, while simultaneously jeopardizing healthcare access for millions of Americans.

Washington, D.C., July 1, 2025 — On July 1, the U.S. Senate passed a budget reconciliation bill that includes an unprecedented allocation of funds for immigration detention and enforcement. This decision comes at a time when millions of Americans face the loss of their healthcare coverage.

The bill was passed with a tie-breaking vote from Vice President JD Vance, earmarking approximately $170 billion for immigration and border enforcement-related provisions. This funding represents a significant increase in the federal budget for immigration enforcement.

Among the key allocations in the bill are $45 billion designated for the construction of new immigration detention centers, including facilities for families. This funding marks a staggering 265 percent increase in the annual budget for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and is 62 percent larger than the entire federal prison system budget. The new funding could result in the daily detention of at least 116,000 non-citizens.

Additionally, the bill allocates $29.9 billion for ICE’s enforcement and deportation operations, effectively tripling the agency’s annual budget. This increase in funding for enforcement comes at a time when between 12 million and 17 million people are at risk of losing their healthcare coverage.

The legislation also caps the number of immigration judges at 800, despite the ongoing record backlogs in the immigration court system. Furthermore, it includes $46.6 billion for border wall construction, which is more than three times the amount spent by the Trump administration during its first term. Critics argue that the wall has failed to contribute meaningfully to border management strategies.

Another notable provision is a new $10 billion fund intended to reimburse the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for costs associated with “safeguarding” U.S. borders against illegal entry. This funding constitutes nearly 50 percent of the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) budget for fiscal year 2024. However, unlike standard budget allocations, this fund lacks strict guidelines, potentially allowing CBP to utilize the funds with minimal oversight.

Overall, this legislation marks the largest investment in detention and deportation in U.S. history. Critics contend that this policy choice does not address the systemic failures of the immigration system and instead exacerbates issues, causing harm and chaos while tearing families apart.

“This bill will deprive 12 to 17 million Americans of basic healthcare while investing unprecedented levels of funding in the president’s increasingly unpopular mass deportation agenda,” said Nayna Gupta, policy director at the American Immigration Council. “At a time when polls show more Americans rejecting mass detention and deportation, this bill ignores what Americans want and doubles down on punitive policies that do nothing to address the real problems in our immigration system, including court backlogs, a lack of legal pathways to citizenship, and a broken U.S. asylum system.”

The enforcement-heavy provisions of the bill come at the expense of necessary investments in asylum processing, legal representation, community-based alternatives to detention, and support for local governments and nonprofits that assist new arrivals.

“Throwing billions at detention centers and enforcement agents is short-sighted. Instead, we should be investing in a system aimed at welcoming immigrants who contribute billions to our economy,” stated Adriel Orozco, senior policy counsel at the American Immigration Council. “We don’t need more jail beds and indiscriminate raids. We need balanced solutions that strengthen due process and keep families together.”

The bill will now return to the House of Representatives, where members are expected to vote on final passage later this week. Experts from the American Immigration Council are available to provide further insights into the specifics of the bill, including its implications for immigration courts, border funding, unaccompanied children, and the increase in ICE agents.

Source: Original article

Stalin Joins Rahul Yatra in Bihar, Criticizes EC and BJP

Staff ReporterElection, Politics 0

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. K. Stalin joined Rahul Gandhi’s Voter Adhikar Yatra in Bihar, criticizing the Election Commission and the BJP while praising local leaders for their commitment to democracy.

Bihar: Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and DMK chief M. K. Stalin participated in the Voter Adhikar Yatra led by Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday, where he condemned the Election Commission for its recent voter roll deletions. He described the removal of 6.5 million Biharis from the voter list as a “massacre of democracy,” emphasizing that it is an affront to those born and living in their own land.

Stalin, who traveled over 2,000 kilometers to join the rally, addressed a public meeting alongside party MP Kanimozhi. He expressed his admiration for Bihar, stating, “When we say Bihar, the one who comes to everyone’s mind is the name of Lalu Prasad Yadav.” He praised Yadav as a symbol of social justice and secularism, recalling the close friendship between Yadav and the late DMK leader Kalaignar.

Stalin highlighted Yadav’s resilience in the face of political challenges, asserting, “Despite so many cases and threats, he did politics without fearing the BJP. Lalu Prasad Yadav stands tall today as one of India’s greatest political leaders.” He also commended Tejashwi Yadav, Lalu’s son, for his dedication to the political legacy of his father.

Reflecting on Bihar’s historical significance, Stalin remarked that the entire nation has been watching the state for the past month. He noted, “That is the strength of the people of Bihar. The strength of Rahul Gandhi. The strength of Tejashwi.” He recalled the legacy of Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Narayan, who rallied for democracy and socialism, drawing parallels to the current efforts of Gandhi and Tejashwi Yadav in their yatra.

The DMK leader emphasized the camaraderie between Gandhi and Tejashwi, stating, “Your friendship is not only political; it is the friendship of two brothers. You have come together to protect democracy—for the welfare of the people.” He expressed confidence that this alliance would lead to victory in the upcoming Bihar elections.

Stalin took a strong stance against the BJP, declaring, “The BJP’s treacherous politics is going to lose. Even before the election, your victory has already been decided.” He accused the ruling party of attempting to undermine the electoral process to prevent a fair vote, asserting that the Election Commission has become a “puppet” of the BJP.

He reiterated his condemnation of the voter roll deletions, asking, “To remove people born and living in their own land from the rolls, what could be more terror than that?” He criticized the BJP for trying to thwart the electoral success of Gandhi and Tejashwi through underhanded tactics.

Stalin praised Gandhi for his courage in exposing the alleged manipulations of the Election Commission, noting that the Chief Election Commissioner has demanded Gandhi file an affidavit and apologize. “Will Rahul Gandhi be afraid of these threats?” he asked the crowd, affirming Gandhi’s fearless approach to politics.

He accused the BJP of infringing upon the people’s right to vote, asserting that the public would ultimately reclaim their power. “That is what this gathering in Bihar shows,” he said, referencing the unity of opposition parties against the BJP’s dominance.

Stalin recalled the origins of the INDIA alliance in Patna, stating that it was here that the BJP’s perceived invincibility was challenged. He urged the people of Bihar to once again demonstrate that any form of dictatorship must yield to the power of the populace.

During the yatra, Gandhi also took the opportunity to criticize the BJP-led NDA government. He pointed to a media report alleging that anonymous parties in Gujarat received donations totaling Rs 4,300 crore between 2019 and 2024, questioning whether the Election Commission would investigate these claims.

In a pointed remark aimed at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Gandhi recounted an incident during Operation Sindoor, where he alleged that Modi halted military actions under pressure from former U.S. President Donald Trump. “Trump dialed PM Modi and said: ‘Listen… whatever you’re doing, stop it within 24 hours,’ and Narendra Modi stopped everything within five hours,” he stated.

The 16-day Voter Adhikar Yatra, which commenced on August 17 from Sasaram, is set to conclude with a pad yatra in Patna on September 1. The journey has covered over 1,300 kilometers across various districts in Bihar, with assembly elections approaching later this year.

As the yatra progresses, it continues to draw significant attention and participation, underscoring the political mobilization in Bihar ahead of the elections.

Source: Original article

Ethan Agarwal, Indian-American Entrepreneur, Announces Candidacy for California Governor

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

Palo Alto entrepreneur Ethan Agarwal has officially announced his candidacy for California Governor in the 2026 elections, emphasizing a blend of progressive values and pro-business policies.

Palo Alto-based Indian-American entrepreneur Ethan Agarwal has declared his intention to run for Governor of California in the upcoming 2026 gubernatorial elections. The announcement was first reported by Axios on August 25, which described Agarwal as a “Democrat who believes in capitalism.”

Agarwal is the founder of two startups, Aaptiv and The Coterie, and has successfully raised a total of $110 million for his ventures, as noted on his LinkedIn profile. In a video shared on social media to announce his candidacy, he articulated his political stance, stating, “I’m pro-choice, I believe in gun control, I believe in immigration, I believe in LGBTQ rights, I’m also fiercely pro-capitalism.”

Through various social media platforms, Agarwal has expanded on his positions regarding a range of issues. He identifies as pro-business and has expressed concern that California is losing its competitive edge as tech companies relocate to other states. He advocates for substantial investment in infrastructure and energy capacity within California.

In a recent social media post, Agarwal outlined “ten ideas to make California better.” Among his proposals, he suggested the construction of three additional University of California campuses and the relocation of the state capital from Sacramento to either San Francisco or Los Angeles.

Support for Agarwal’s campaign is gaining momentum, with notable figures such as Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan, DoorDash co-founder Stanley Tang, and Tribe Capital co-founder Arjun Sethi planning to host fundraising events for him. Additionally, Agarwal has scheduled two virtual campaign rallies for September 14 and September 21.

As the 2026 gubernatorial elections approach, Agarwal’s unique blend of progressive ideals and a strong pro-business agenda may resonate with a diverse electorate in California.

Source: Original article

Democrats Seek Unity Against Trump at Conclusion of DNC Meeting

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

Democrats are striving for unity amid internal divisions and fundraising challenges as the DNC’s summer meeting concludes, focusing on strategies to counter President Trump’s agenda.

MINNEAPOLIS, MN – As the Democratic National Committee (DNC) wraps up its annual summer meeting, Chair Ken Martin is set to emphasize the necessity of party unity. Sources indicate that Martin will highlight the importance of moving forward as a cohesive group, particularly in the face of President Donald Trump’s recent actions since his return to the White House seven months ago.

“In this big tent party of ours, we are unified towards one single goal: to stop Donald Trump and put this country back on track,” Martin stated at the meeting’s opening on Monday.

During his closing address, Martin is expected to reflect on the momentum Democrats have gained heading into the fall elections. He will point to the party’s success in “overperforming or winning in 36 out of 37 key elections” during his tenure as chair, according to a source familiar with the discussions.

However, the DNC faces significant challenges as it seeks to regain its footing after last year’s electoral setbacks, which saw the party lose control of the White House and the Senate while failing to reclaim a House majority. Recent polling indicates a troubling decline in the Democratic brand, particularly among younger voters, with approval ratings hitting all-time lows.

Additionally, the DNC is grappling with a substantial fundraising deficit compared to the Republican National Committee (RNC) and concerns over dwindling party registration numbers.

As Democrats push for a more aggressive stance against Trump’s agenda, Martin has criticized the president’s leadership, describing him as “a dictator-in-chief” and his administration as “fascism dressed in a red tie.” He expressed frustration with the party’s previous approach, stating, “I’m sick and tired of this Democratic Party bringing a pencil to a knife fight.” Martin urged party members to adopt a more combative strategy.

Despite calls for unity, tensions surfaced during the meeting as a key DNC panel debated two conflicting resolutions regarding the Israel-Hamas conflict. The Resolutions Committee voted down a symbolic resolution advocating for an arms embargo and the suspension of U.S. military aid to Israel, a long-standing ally in the Middle East.

In contrast, a separate resolution supported by Martin, which called for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access to Gaza, was unanimously approved. However, the rejection of the more assertive resolution proposed by 26-year-old Allison Minnerly, a new DNC member from Florida, sparked dissent among some committee members.

DNC committee member Sophia Danenberg expressed concern over the party’s stance, stating, “It’s not enough. People want to hear a louder, stronger statement.” She warned that a lack of courage on this issue could jeopardize the party’s future.

Following discussions with Minnerly, Martin requested the committee to withdraw his resolution to foster unity and facilitate further dialogue. “We need to keep working through this. We have to find a path forward as a party, and we have to stay unified,” he remarked, a sentiment that was well-received by the committee.

The debate over the resolutions reflects a broader fracture within the Democratic Party regarding its historical support for Israel, particularly in light of rising concerns over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Recent polling suggests that support for Israel’s military actions is waning among Democrats.

In addition to the Israel resolutions, the committee unanimously approved measures affirming the party’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in response to ongoing conservative backlash against such initiatives. Another resolution condemned the first six months of Trump’s second administration.

These resolutions will be presented for a vote by the full DNC membership during the closing general session on Wednesday.

As the meeting progressed, Martin announced the commencement of the presidential calendar process, indicating that preparations for the 2028 election cycle are underway. He emphasized the need for a rigorous and fair primary process to ensure the selection of a strong candidate capable of leading the party forward.

In the coming months, DNC officials will establish rules for states vying for early positions in the presidential primary calendar. This follows the DNC’s decision to alter traditional lead-off states, with South Carolina now set to kick off the 2024 primaries, as per President Biden’s preferences.

Martin also underscored the importance of maintaining neutrality among DNC officers and staff during what is expected to be a crowded Democratic primary process. “We have an obligation to Democrats not in this room,” he stated, reinforcing the need for impartiality as the party navigates its upcoming electoral challenges.

Source: Original article

Reform UK Plans To Deport 600,000 Asylum Seekers In New Crackdown

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has proposed a controversial plan to deport 600,000 asylum seekers, sparking criticism from various political and charitable organizations.

Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, has unveiled a sweeping proposal aimed at addressing immigration in Britain. The plan includes the deportation of up to 600,000 asylum seekers and the withdrawal from key international treaties, including the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Farage’s announcement comes amid rising concerns over immigration, with the party asserting that such measures are necessary to prevent “civil disorder.” He characterized the current situation as an “invasion,” claiming that young men are illegally entering the country.

Dubbed Operation Restoring Justice, the initiative is presented as a solution to the ongoing issue of small boats crossing the English Channel. Farage stated that migrants intercepted at sea should be detained and subsequently deported. “If we do that, the boats will stop coming in days because there will be no incentive,” he asserted during a press conference.

The ECHR has been a critical component of U.K. human rights law, often utilized to halt the deportation of migrants deemed to be in the country illegally. Farage’s proposal to repeal the Human Rights Act and scrap international treaties that impede forced deportations has drawn significant criticism.

Labour Party Chairwoman Ellie Reeves responded to the announcement by emphasizing the lack of detail in the plan. “Today, we got none of those things, nor a single answer to the practical, financial, or ethical questions about how their plan would work,” she remarked.

This proposal follows weeks of small protests addressing mass migration and crimes associated with some asylum seekers. In 2024, Britain received a record 108,100 asylum applications, with many coming from countries such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, and Bangladesh.

Polling data indicates that immigration has surpassed economic concerns as the top issue for voters. Despite holding only four seats in Parliament, Reform UK is currently leading in surveys regarding voting intentions.

Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook dismissed the proposals as “a series of gimmicks” that would ultimately prove ineffective. Critics, including various charities, argue that the plan represents a significant departure from Britain’s human rights commitments.

As the debate continues, the implications of such a drastic immigration policy remain a contentious topic within British politics.

Source: Original article

Sunil Gavaskar Critiques Asia Cup Squad Selection Debate

Staff ReporterCricket, Election, USA 0

Sunil Gavaskar criticized foreign cricketers for disparaging Indian cricket, asserting they are merely trying to profit from their comments.

Sunil Gavaskar, the legendary Indian cricketer, has voiced strong criticism against overseas players who he believes are undermining Indian cricket. He accused them of “throwing dirt” on the sport in India while attempting to profit from their remarks.

Gavaskar’s comments come in the context of ongoing debates surrounding the selection of the Indian squad for the Asia Cup. The former cricketer has been a vocal advocate for the integrity of Indian cricket, often defending its players and the decisions made by the selection committee.

In recent years, several international cricketers have made headlines for their controversial statements regarding Indian players and the cricketing system in India. Gavaskar argues that these comments are often motivated by a desire to gain attention or financial benefit rather than a genuine concern for the sport.

He emphasized that Indian cricket has a rich history and a strong following, and it should not be tarnished by the opinions of those who do not fully understand its nuances. Gavaskar’s remarks serve as a reminder of the pride many Indian cricketers feel for their national team and the sport as a whole.

As discussions around the Asia Cup squad continue, Gavaskar’s sharp critique highlights the tensions that can arise in the world of cricket, especially when it comes to national pride and the influence of foreign voices.

His passionate defense of Indian cricket resonates with fans and players alike, reinforcing the notion that the sport is not just a game but a significant part of India’s cultural identity.

Gavaskar’s legacy as a cricketer and commentator positions him as a key figure in these discussions, and his insights are often sought after by both the media and cricket enthusiasts.

As the Asia Cup approaches, the focus will remain on the players selected to represent India, but Gavaskar’s comments remind everyone of the broader context in which these discussions take place.

In a sport that often sees players from different nations engaging in friendly banter, Gavaskar’s call for respect and understanding underscores the importance of valuing the contributions of Indian cricket while also acknowledging the perspectives of international players.

Ultimately, the debate surrounding the Asia Cup squad is just one of many instances where the intersection of national pride and international scrutiny plays out in the world of cricket.

As fans eagerly await the tournament, Gavaskar’s words will likely echo in the minds of many, serving as a rallying cry for those who cherish the legacy of Indian cricket.

Source: Original article

Kaelyn Faces Debt to Prevent Partner’s Deportation to El Salvador

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics, Travel/Immigration 0

Kaelyn’s relationship with Yapa, an asylum seeker from Venezuela, has turned into a desperate struggle against deportation, leading her to incur significant debt for legal assistance.

Last summer, Kaelyn found herself at a Latin club in Wilmington, North Carolina, when a charming stranger asked her to dance. Initially reluctant, she was drawn in by his genuine nature. “If anyone else had asked, I would’ve said no, but Yapa is so genuine,” she recalls, using a pseudonym to protect his identity. What began with a dance blossomed into a deep friendship, one that would soon lead to a fight for Yapa’s freedom.

Yapa, who fled violence in Venezuela in 2022, had been navigating the complexities of the U.S. immigration system. He attended regular court hearings and held a legal work permit, working as a delivery driver while aspiring to obtain his commercial trucking license. As their relationship deepened, Kaelyn became an integral part of his life.

The couple spent Thanksgiving together, with Yapa bonding with Kaelyn’s family. He played pool with her father, and her sisters affectionately began calling Kaelyn “reina”—a term of endearment Yapa had used when they first met. They enjoyed movie nights, often watching the Fast and Furious series, and supported each other through language barriers with translation apps and Kaelyn’s college Spanish. Each morning, Yapa would text her to inquire about her day, solidifying their connection.

Before meeting Yapa, Kaelyn, originally from Connecticut, had rarely considered immigration policy. However, the political climate shifted dramatically after President Trump took office, leading her to worry about the fate of asylum seekers. “People would tell me, Oh, you’re overreacting,” she says. “This isn’t 1930s Germany. And I’d say, Yeah, but it’s starting to feel that way. Looking back now, while people were telling me I was being dramatic, I was actually underreacting.”

On February 22, 2025, everything changed when ICE agents unexpectedly arrived in the early morning hours as Yapa was heading to work. Without explanation, they handcuffed him, confiscating his ID and work permit—documents that have not been returned. They provided no details about his destination, only that he was being deported soon.

Kaelyn was devastated when she received a call from Yapa’s sister, informing her that ICE had “abducted” him. Yapa had stayed with Kaelyn until the night before, and she had hoped he would remain with her, feeling that as a U.S. citizen, she could better advocate for his rights. “I couldn’t explain it, but I was so emotional,” she reflects on their last night together. “And he told me, ‘There’s no reason for them to take me.’” Now, her worst fears had materialized, and they were uncertain of his whereabouts, but they knew they had to act quickly to save him.

By the time Kaelyn took action, Yapa had already been transported to Georgia’s Stewart Detention Center. It wasn’t until two months later, during his hearing, that ICE accused him of being affiliated with the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua (TdA). “Shocking is not even the word,” Kaelyn recalls. “I was shaking.”

In a recent court filing, ICE admitted it has no evidence linking Yapa to any gang. However, a ruling from the Trump administration complicates matters for immigrants like Yapa, who have recently entered the country and are seeking release from detention. As a result, Yapa faces the prospect of spending up to a year in detention while his asylum case is processed, with little control over where he might be deported if he loses.

Kaelyn’s reaction to the gang allegations was visceral; she understood the gravity of the situation. The possibility of Yapa being sent to CECOT, a notorious prison in El Salvador known for its brutality, weighed heavily on her. “I thought, I’m going to have to live the rest of my life knowing he’s in there, and there’s nothing that we can do to get him out of there,” she says. The notion that he—and many other innocent individuals—could be imprisoned in what some describe as a modern-day concentration camp is an “atrocity,” she asserts.

The emotional and financial toll on Kaelyn has been immense. She has hired multiple attorneys for Yapa, accumulating significant debt due to legal fees. Meanwhile, Yapa remains nine hours away from Wilmington, with limited access to phone calls. In April, attorneys from the American Immigration Council and the ACLU took on part of Yapa’s case pro bono. By May, they secured a ruling that prevents the Trump administration from deporting Yapa to CECOT or anywhere else based on the unsubstantiated gang allegations without allowing him a fair chance to contest them. While this decision brought some relief, Kaelyn feels as though her life has been turned upside down.

Conversations with her sister now primarily revolve around updates on Yapa’s case and the latest developments in immigration policy. “We can’t be happy when there’s literally a member of our family who’s been taken from us,” she states. “I’ll never let this go. The administration thinks they’re sowing fear—but they’re creating activists. You can’t destroy someone’s life and expect us to stay quiet.”

Source: Original article

Redistricting Conflicts Challenge Minority Voting Power and Democratic Trust

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Redistricting battles in the U.S. threaten minority voting power and undermine public trust in democracy as political parties manipulate district maps for electoral advantage.

Redistricting—the process of redrawing congressional maps after each census—is intended to promote fairness and accurate representation. However, in today’s polarized political climate, it has become one of the most contentious issues in U.S. politics. At its core, the issue is straightforward: the party that controls the redistricting process often dictates the outcome of elections. Currently, Republicans in Texas and Democrats in California are wielding redistricting as a tool to secure more congressional seats, raising concerns about the erosion of democratic principles and public trust in the electoral system.

The urgency of the situation was underscored during an August 22 briefing by American Community Media (ACoM), where experts discussed the potential consequences of proposed map changes. Texas has aggressively pursued redrawing its congressional districts with the aim of adding five Republican-dominated districts, a strategy designed to flip the House in the 2026 midterm elections.

State Representative Gene Wu, the Democratic Leader in the Texas House, has characterized this effort as “cheating.” He argues that Republicans are responsible for policies leading to significant price increases, job losses, and a looming recession. “Here’s the problem. If this is allowed to happen across the board, if every state, whether they’re red or blue, does this every single time after every election, politicians and leaders will no longer listen to the people,” Rep. Wu explains. “Why would they need to listen when they’re guaranteed to win every time?”

At the heart of the redistricting debate is the potential dilution of minority voting power, which directly impacts communities of color. This dilution occurs through two primary tactics: packing and cracking. Packing involves concentrating too many minority voters into a single district, allowing them to win decisively in that district but diminishing their influence elsewhere. For instance, in Houston, two historically strong Black districts are being merged into one that is 80% Black. This change means the community would elect only one Black representative instead of two, effectively halving their overall representation.

Cracking, on the other hand, involves dispersing minority communities across multiple districts dominated by white voters. In regions like South Texas and Dallas, Latino voters have spent years building political power. However, the new maps fracture their communities, splitting them into separate districts, thereby diminishing their collective voice. As Rep. Wu succinctly puts it, “They can vote all they want. They’ll never be able to change the outcome of any election.”

Thomas Saenz, President and General Counsel at the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), emphasizes that Texas has previously manipulated the rules during the 2021 redistricting process to solidify Republican control. The resulting map ignored the state’s rapid demographic changes, providing Republicans with an unfair advantage.

Now, with the push for five additional GOP seats, Saenz argues that Texas is blatantly violating the Voting Rights Act. He points out that the growth of Latino and other communities of color in Texas since 2020 has outpaced that of the white community. In a fair system, this demographic growth should translate into increased political power for those communities. Instead, the new maps are designed to suppress that power, effectively erasing the gains that should accompany population growth.

In California, Governor Gavin Newsom has responded with his own aggressive strategy. He has pushed legislation to suspend the state’s independent redistricting commission and place a new Democratic-leaning map on the November ballot, aiming to secure up to five additional House seats. Newsom describes this approach as “fighting fire with fire,” framing it as a necessary countermeasure to the gerrymandering tactics employed by Republicans in Texas.

Sam Wang, Director of the Electoral Innovation Lab at Princeton University, notes that while there are standards for racial fairness in redistricting, they are not uniformly applied across states. The Supreme Court has ruled that partisan redistricting is unconstitutional but has refrained from taking action to address it. This lack of oversight means that state-level actions and laws are crucial in tackling voting rights issues. Wang explains that Texas, lacking state laws governing redistricting, operates in a “Wild West” environment, leaving legislative Democrats with few options other than denying a quorum. In contrast, states like California, Michigan, Colorado, Arizona, Virginia, and New Jersey have established independent commissions or other mechanisms to ensure fairer redistricting processes.

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF), represented by Assistant Counsel Sara Rohani, is actively fighting against unfair redistricting practices across the nation. Following the 2020 census, which revealed significant growth among voters of color, many states redrew their maps without a key safeguard from the Voting Rights Act that the Supreme Court struck down in 2013. Without this protection, numerous states enacted maps that weakened Black and Latino voting power.

While courts have invalidated discriminatory maps in states such as Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and Louisiana, the battles continue. Alabama has openly defied a Supreme Court order and is now attempting to dismantle the Voting Rights Act itself. In Louisiana, a newly proposed Black-majority district, which should have expanded representation, is being challenged as a “racial gerrymander” and has been sent back to court. Rohani explains that the LDF is now compelled not only to sue against unfair maps but also to defend fair ones from being dismantled.

Despite these challenges, experts agree on one crucial point: voter turnout remains the most potent weapon against gerrymandering. When minority communities mobilize and vote in large numbers, they can effectively counteract suppression efforts.

Source: Original article

Behind the Controversy of Redrawing Texas Political Maps

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Texas is embroiled in a contentious political battle over redistricting, raising concerns about representation and the voices of marginalized communities ahead of the 2026 elections.

The Lone Star State is currently facing a political firestorm that extends beyond party control; it delves into the fundamental issue of representation. The ongoing debate centers on whose voices are amplified and whose are marginalized in the electoral process.

On August 14, a briefing hosted by American Community Media (ACoM) brought together state lawmakers, civil rights lawyers, and advocates to address what they term a “redistricting war.” The focus of this conflict is the Republican-led initiative to redraw Texas’s electoral maps, a move critics argue is designed to benefit the party in the upcoming 2026 elections while undermining the voting power of Black, Latino, and Asian communities.

Texas State Representative Gene Wu, who participated in the briefing from Chicago, highlighted the urgency of the situation. Wu, along with numerous Democratic colleagues, had previously staged a dramatic walkout on August 3 to block a quorum and stall the redistricting bill. “This isn’t just politics—it’s cheating,” Wu asserted. “They’re trying to rewrite the rules mid-game because they know they’re losing.”

Wu elaborated on the tactics being employed in the redistricting process, describing them as “cracking and packing.” He explained, “They’re cracking minority communities into pieces and attaching them to districts that don’t share their interests. Or they’re packing us into one district, so we can’t influence others. Either way, it’s about silencing us.”

He raised a critical alarm about the implications of these changes: “If this goes through, your voice will carry less weight. If you’re Latino, your vote might count as one-third of a white vote. If you’re Black, maybe one-fifth. That’s not democracy.” Wu warned that if such practices are allowed to continue, it could set a dangerous precedent for redistricting efforts across the country. “If they get away with this, every state will start redrawing maps after every election they don’t like. That’s the end of our republic,” he cautioned.

The concerns surrounding the redistricting process are echoed by Karla Maradiaga, a voting rights attorney with the Texas Civil Rights Project. Maradiaga recounted her experience at a redistricting hearing in Houston, where nearly 1,000 individuals signed up to speak despite the maps not yet being released. “People showed up anyway,” she noted, emphasizing the community’s concern over the lack of transparency in the process.

Maradiaga criticized the current redistricting efforts as being driven by political pressures rather than the needs of the community or census data. “This process should be open and fair,” she stated. “Instead, it’s being driven by a letter from the DOJ under Trump.”

She also addressed the misconception surrounding partisan gerrymandering, clarifying that while Republicans assert it is legal, the Supreme Court has not endorsed it. “The Supreme Court didn’t say it’s OK. It said it’s not their job to fix it. That’s a big difference,” she explained. Maradiaga is currently pursuing legal challenges against the redistricting efforts, including a case in Tarrant County where a predominantly minority district was dismantled, resulting in the removal of a Black woman commissioner from office. “We’re fighting back,” she affirmed. “Because this is about protecting the right to vote.”

Melissa Ayala, a longtime activist and resident of Congressional District 29, shared her personal experiences regarding the impact of the new maps on her community. “We’re a working-class, mostly Latino district,” she said. “Now they’ve redrawn it into a weird box that favors Republicans. It’s clear parts we were left out on purpose.”

Ayala, who previously worked as a census worker, understands the importance of accurate representation. “I learned about redistricting through the census. But now, even older folks are just learning how it works—and how it affects them,” she remarked. She highlighted the economic pressures that hinder families from staying politically engaged, stating, “Groceries are up. Cars are expensive. People are just trying to survive. But we still need to vote. We still need to organize.”

Her message was clear: “We’re not just voters—we’re also on the menu. If we don’t fight back, we’ll be served up.”

Carmela Walker, Program Manager at the Houston Area Urban League, emphasized the high stakes for Black communities in this redistricting battle. “This isn’t just about race—it’s about humanity,” Walker said. “When you lose your voice, you lose your ability to fight for schools, healthcare, safety—everything.”

Walker shared troubling accounts of families facing mistreatment in schools and communities without representation. “We got a call about a mom who was arrested just for sitting with her child in the cafeteria. That’s what happens when you don’t have representation,” she recounted.

She called for unity and civic education, asserting that fairness is a civic value that transcends partisanship and race. “No one’s coming to save us. We have to save ourselves,” she urged, emphasizing the need for community solidarity.

Despite the grim outlook, the speakers at the briefing remained united in their call to action: stay engaged, stay vocal, and keep voting. In closing remarks, Wu advocated for “trigger laws” in blue states like California to counter Texas’s redistricting moves. Maradiaga reiterated the importance of litigation, while Ayala urged for more town halls and grassroots organizing. Walker reminded attendees that “we’re stronger together.”

Source: Original article

Texas Businessman Charged with Federal Tax Evasion in Texas

Staff ReporterBusiness, Law/Legal, Politics 0

A Texas businessman has been indicted for federal tax evasion, accused of diverting company funds for personal use and failing to report significant income.

TYLER, TX – A federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Texas has indicted Anil Surabhi, a 43-year-old Indian citizen residing in McKinney, on charges of attempting to evade taxes.

The indictment alleges that Surabhi, who managed an IT services company based in Georgia, misappropriated substantial company funds for his personal gain.

According to the legal document, Surabhi’s misuse of funds included financing private investments, covering personal expenses, and making real estate purchases. Notably, he is accused of failing to report these significant disbursements as income on his individual income tax returns.

If convicted of the federal charge, Surabhi could face a maximum sentence of five years in federal prison.

Source: Original article

Democrats Debate Israel-Hamas Conflict and Dark Money at DNC Meeting

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Democratic Party officials gathered in Minnesota for their annual meeting, facing internal divisions over the Gaza war and campaign finance reforms while emphasizing unity against former President Donald Trump.

Democratic Party officials and committee members convened in Minnesota on Monday for their annual summer meeting, where they engaged in discussions about competing positions regarding the ongoing war in Gaza and the need for campaign finance reforms.

The meeting commenced with a call for unity against former President Donald Trump, despite the underlying tensions within the party. “We are unified towards one single goal: to stop Donald Trump and put this country back on track,” declared DNC Chair Ken Martin to the more than 400 elected officials from all 50 states and seven territories.

While the Democrats appeared to rally around the objective of countering Trump’s controversial actions since his return to the White House, divisions among committee members were anticipated to surface during the discussions scheduled for Tuesday.

On the agenda was the ongoing conflict in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, alongside the issue of limiting dark money in presidential politics. The DNC’s Resolutions Committee was set to meet, where competing symbolic resolutions regarding the Gaza war would be voted on. This conflict was ignited by Hamas’s surprise attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, which resulted in nearly 1,200 Israeli deaths and over 250 hostages taken. In the aftermath, Israel’s military response has led to the deaths of over 60,000 Palestinians.

The Democratic Party’s historically strong support for Israel has begun to fracture amid rising concerns over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, particularly among the party’s progressive base. Recent polling indicates a significant decline in support for Israel’s military actions among Democrats.

One resolution, which Martin supports, calls for a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas. In contrast, a competing resolution advocates for an arms embargo and the suspension of U.S. military aid to Israel, a long-standing ally in the Middle East.

Another resolution expected to generate significant debate is Martin’s proposal for the DNC to reaffirm its commitment to eliminating unlimited corporate and dark money in the presidential nominating process, starting with the 2028 cycle. This initiative aims to create a new panel that will propose enforceable measures to curb the influence of dark money in the party’s primary elections.

As the influence of super PACs, which can accept unlimited contributions but must disclose their donors, has grown in recent election cycles, the call for reform has gained traction among party leaders.

Democratic leaders are gathering at a critical time for the party, which is attempting to recover from significant electoral losses in the previous year. The Democrats lost control of the White House and Senate and fell short in their efforts to regain a House majority. Additionally, Republicans have made gains among voter demographics that were once key to the Democratic base.

The situation has only worsened for the Democrats in the ten months following those electoral setbacks. The party’s brand has become increasingly unpopular, particularly among younger voters, as national surveys show approval ratings at all-time lows. The DNC is also facing a substantial fundraising deficit compared to the Republican National Committee (RNC), with voter registration data indicating a decline in Democratic Party registrations while GOP sign-ups have increased in 30 states that register voters by party.

Amid these challenges, Martin and other party leaders emphasized the importance of unity. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz addressed committee members, stating, “There’s a division in my damn house, and we’re still married, and things are good. That’s life… We are strong because we challenge each other.”

Longtime Democratic strategist and DNC committee member Maria Cardona echoed this sentiment, expressing frustration over the focus on internal conflicts. “I’m so sick of people focusing on the infighting and the circular firing squad. All of that is crap when we have real issues, existential threats that we need to fight about, and we are all united on that front and that’s all that matters,” she said.

Martin, who was elected DNC chair in February, has navigated considerable turmoil during his tenure, including controversy surrounding former vice chair David Hogg’s support for primary challengers against older House Democrats in secure blue districts.

In response to the DNC’s summer meeting, RNC communications director Zach Parkinson criticized Martin’s leadership, stating, “Under Ken Martin’s leadership, Democrats have sunk to their lowest approval rating in 35 years.” He added that Republicans view Martin’s leadership positively, suggesting they would endorse him to continue as DNC Chair.

Source: Original article

Hungry Families and Military Spending: Scrutiny of Pakistan’s Priorities

Staff ReporterElection, Nation, Politics 0

Pakistan’s recent launch of its third Hangor submarine highlights a stark contrast between rising defense spending and the growing hardships faced by its citizens amid soaring food prices and electricity costs.

The Pakistan Navy celebrated the launch of its third Hangor-class submarine at Wuhan’s Wuchang Shipyard on August 15, 2025. While naval officials hailed the event as a significant milestone in the modernization of the country’s underwater warfare capabilities, many Pakistanis viewed it as a troubling juxtaposition. The billions allocated for foreign-built submarines come at a time when households are grappling with soaring food inflation, increasing electricity tariffs, and diminishing purchasing power.

The Hangor submarine deal, signed in 2015, is estimated to cost between USD 5 billion and USD 6 billion. Under this agreement, four of the eight submarines will be constructed in China, while the remaining four will be assembled at Karachi Shipyard, utilizing a transfer-of-technology package. However, as fiscal constraints tighten, the trade-off between expensive prestige projects and the daily survival of citizens has become increasingly difficult to overlook.

In the federal budget for FY2025–26, Pakistan allocated PKR 2.12 trillion for defense, marking a 14% increase from the previous year. In stark contrast, the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP), the country’s flagship welfare initiative, received only a 7% increase, bringing its total to PKR 460 billion. Development spending under the Public Sector Development Programme remained stagnant at PKR 1.25 trillion.

Debt servicing is projected to consume an astonishing PKR 9.6 trillion this year, surpassing the combined expenditures for development and welfare. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) noted in its March 2025 staff review that Pakistan’s policy framework continues to emphasize fiscal consolidation, with energy subsidy reform as a central component. This has led to increased fuel and electricity tariffs and tighter social spending, even as military allocations continue to grow.

The impact of these economic pressures is most acutely felt in households across the nation. Data from the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics revealed that food inflation reached 20.3% year-on-year in June 2025, with overall inflation at 17.4%. The prices of essential commodities such as wheat, sugar, and cooking oil have surged, pushing 42.3% of the population below the poverty line, according to the World Bank. The World Food Programme further reported that 82% of households are unable to afford a healthy diet, with food expenses constituting more than half of average household budgets.

Electricity tariffs have risen by more than 45% since 2023, as determined by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority. This increase has forced families to ration their power usage amid ongoing rolling blackouts. The launch of a submarine in Wuhan stands in stark contrast to the candle-lit homes and long bread queues in cities like Karachi and Lahore, highlighting the disparity between military ambitions and civilian struggles.

For the leadership in Pakistan, the Hangor submarines symbolize strategic resolve and military advancement. Naval officials assert that these submarines will enhance underwater endurance and strengthen deterrence capabilities in the Arabian Sea. However, critics point out that despite three launches, the timelines for operational induction remain uncertain, the engines are untested in export scenarios, and achieving operational readiness could take years.

Analysts have also raised concerns about the disparity between the capabilities promised by the Hangors and India’s existing anti-submarine warfare capabilities. The Indian Navy currently operates 12 P-8I Poseidon patrol aircraft, four Kamorta-class corvettes, and a squadron of MH-60R Seahawks, which were commissioned in 2024. Additionally, the INS Arnala, a shallow-water anti-submarine warfare craft, was inducted in June 2025. For Islamabad, the undersea arms race is an expensive endeavor, while New Delhi has already accounted for its maritime defense needs.

The launch on August 15 not only provided a headline for Pakistan’s Navy but also intensified the divide between elite priorities and the pressing needs of the public. As households struggle with food insecurity, rising tariffs, and dwindling reserves, the funds flowing out for Chinese shipyards raise questions about national priorities.

“The scale of Hangor expenditures has no direct parallel among recent naval procurements, yet exact costs have not been disclosed by authorities,” noted Naval News following the Wuhan event. The lack of transparency, combined with the evident opportunity costs, places relentless pressure on ordinary families.

In 2025, the reality for many in Pakistan is a stark one: hungry families and expensive submarines.

Source: Original article

Australia Expels Iranian Diplomats Over Allegations of Antisemitic Attacks

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, USA 0

Australia is expelling Iranian diplomats after intelligence links the Islamic Republic to recent antisemitic attacks in Sydney and Melbourne.

The Australian government has announced the expulsion of two Iranian diplomats, citing credible intelligence that suggests the Islamic Republic was involved in a series of antisemitic attacks in Sydney and Melbourne.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese addressed reporters, revealing that the country’s primary domestic intelligence agency, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), had gathered sufficient evidence to reach a “deeply disturbing conclusion.” He stated, “The Iranian government directed at least two of these attacks,” referencing incidents at a Sydney restaurant and a Melbourne synagogue.

Albanese emphasized that Iran had attempted to obscure its involvement, but ASIO assessed that the Islamic Republic was indeed behind the attacks. The Australian government communicated the decision to expel the diplomats to Iran’s ambassador shortly before the public announcement.

In a related move, Australia has also withdrawn its diplomats stationed in Iran, relocating them to a third country for safety reasons. This decision follows a noticeable rise in antisemitic incidents in both Melbourne and Sydney, which escalated after the October 7, 2023, massacre in Israel that sparked an ongoing military offensive in Gaza.

In addition to the expulsions, Prime Minister Albanese indicated that Australia intends to designate Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization. This announcement aligns with Australia’s recent plans to recognize Palestinian statehood at the upcoming United Nations General Assembly in September.

The recognition of Palestinian statehood has drawn sharp criticism from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who accused Australia of betraying Israel. He stated, “History will remember Albanese for what he is: A weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia’s Jews.”

As tensions continue to rise, the Australian government remains firm in its stance against antisemitism and the actions of the Iranian government, seeking to protect its citizens and uphold its international commitments.

Source: Original article

CM Omar Optimistic About J&K Statehood Restoration After Supreme Court Hearing

Staff ReporterNation, Politics 0

Omar Abdullah expresses optimism that the Supreme Court will establish a timeline for restoring Jammu and Kashmir’s statehood during the upcoming hearing on October 10.

Srinagar: Former Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, Omar Abdullah, conveyed his optimism on Monday regarding the Supreme Court of India’s upcoming hearing, scheduled for October 10. He expressed hope that the Court would set a timeline for the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir.

“We have been dragged into a prolonged wait by the central government regarding the restoration of statehood. But we now place our hopes in the Supreme Court. We believe it will take a favorable view and ensure our statehood is restored,” Omar stated while addressing reporters.

In response to Mehbooba Mufti’s recent protest concerning the conditions of Kashmiri prisoners, Omar emphasized that the issue lies entirely with the central government. “We have no authority to bring the prisoners back to the Valley. That power rests solely with the Centre. It’s not in our hands,” he remarked.

Omar acknowledged the validity of concerns regarding the health and legal rights of detainees but pointed out that expecting regional parties to intervene in matters controlled by New Delhi is unrealistic.

As the Supreme Court hearing approaches, the political landscape in Jammu and Kashmir remains charged with anticipation regarding the future of statehood and the rights of its citizens. The outcome of the hearing could have significant implications for the region, which has been under central governance since the abrogation of its special status in August 2019.

Omar Abdullah’s remarks reflect a broader sentiment among regional leaders who are advocating for the restoration of statehood and addressing the issues faced by the local population. The upcoming Supreme Court decision is seen as a pivotal moment that could redefine the relationship between Jammu and Kashmir and the central government.

As the situation develops, many are looking to the judiciary to provide clarity and direction on these pressing issues, hoping for a resolution that honors the aspirations of the people of Jammu and Kashmir.

Source: Original article

Beatriz: Immigrant Lawyer Advocating for Noncitizen Children’s Rights

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

Beatriz, a Venezuelan-American lawyer, advocates for unaccompanied minors facing immigration proceedings, navigating challenges posed by recent federal policies that threaten their legal representation.

In February 2025, Beatriz, a Venezuelan-American lawyer, received an unexpected order from the Interior Department directing her nonprofit organization to cease all operations. This directive significantly impacted her work representing unaccompanied minors—children navigating immigration proceedings without their parents.

These vulnerable youngsters often find themselves in precarious situations, living with relatives, placed in foster care, or held in detention centers. Many are as young as Beatriz was when she immigrated to the United States at the age of eight, fleeing violence and political persecution in Venezuela with her family.

Having witnessed her parents struggle through numerous meetings with immigration lawyers, Beatriz pursued a legal career to leverage her experiences in helping others. “I know how terrifying it is to be a child, alone and unable to speak English, trying to deal with authority figures,” she reflects. “That’s why I became a lawyer, to bring some empathy to that process.” Today, Beatriz is a proud U.S. citizen.

The sudden stop-work order disrupted her mission. “It came completely out of the blue—suddenly, everything changed,” Beatriz recalls. The cancellation of federal contracts forced organizations like hers to downsize, leaving those who remained to manage an overwhelming workload. “For those of us left, it was all hands on deck,” she adds.

Although the stop-work order was later lifted, legal disputes over the canceled contracts continue. The immediate fallout, however, has been severe. “In practical terms, it left children without anybody to advocate for them,” Beatriz explains. While barred from providing direct assistance, she and her colleagues attended immigration hearings to observe and take notes. In one particularly heart-wrenching case, Beatriz witnessed a confused six-year-old appear in court without any legal representation. “These young children are being brought to immigration hearings—speaking no English, and without a lawyer—to try to explain why they shouldn’t be deported,” she laments.

Compounding the challenges, immigration courts have increasingly adopted “rocket dockets,” scheduling multiple hearings in a single day. “They started fast-tracking kids through the system at a time when we weren’t able to accompany them,” Beatriz notes. “It’s just been an onslaught of attacks, specifically targeting unaccompanied children.”

Beatriz has also observed the chaos in children’s lives caused by the detention of their caregivers by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Some of her young clients have been placed in detention or the foster care system, while in other instances, the government has withheld information about the whereabouts of caregivers. “It’s something none of my superiors—including people who worked during Trump’s first term—have ever experienced before,” she states.

The impact of these policies is evident in the anxiety experienced by the children Beatriz serves. Many are now afraid to attend school or even leave their homes. “So much of my job is now simply dealing with anxious kids,” she explains. “Pretty much every one of these children has a deep sense that the U.S. is no longer a safe place for them.”

This pervasive fear extends beyond the children to Beatriz’s entire community. Even before the Trump administration canceled Temporary Protected Status for approximately 350,000 Venezuelans, her WhatsApp groups were filled with messages from individuals whose loved ones had vanished from their neighborhoods. “I have friends who are scared to step onto the street,” she shares. “The demonization of my culture and my community is really hurtful, and really harmful.”

As discussions about denaturalizing or deporting U.S. citizens to foreign prisons and eliminating due process for migrants circulate, Beatriz worries for the safety of her own family, all of whom are now American citizens. “We worked hard to get citizenship, but there’s a real fear that even that won’t protect us,” she says. “For Venezuelans, the feelings of insecurity are always present. It really weighs heavily on us.”

Source: Original article

Supreme Court Schedules Hearing for J&K Statehood Plea on October 10

Staff ReporterNation India, Politics 0

The Supreme Court has denied an urgent hearing regarding the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir, scheduling the case for October 10.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India has declined a request for an urgent hearing concerning the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir, setting the next hearing date for October 10.

During the proceedings, the counsel representing the petitioners urged the court to expedite the listing of a contempt petition related to the abrogation of Article 370. They argued that statehood should be restored to the Union Territory.

Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, who led the bench, rejected the request, noting that the case is already scheduled for a hearing on October 10. “The court will have to sit in a constitutional bench of presidential reference. The matter cannot be listed before October 10,” the Chief Justice stated.

On August 14, the Supreme Court had requested a response from the Centre within eight weeks regarding the petition seeking the restoration of statehood. At that time, the bench emphasized the importance of considering the current ground situation before making any decisions.

“You cannot ignore what happened in Pahalgam,” the Chief Justice remarked, referencing a recent terror attack that resulted in the loss of 26 lives.

The Supreme Court’s decision reflects the complexities surrounding the issue of statehood for Jammu and Kashmir, which has been a contentious topic since the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019. The court’s upcoming hearing on October 10 will be closely watched as it may set the tone for future discussions regarding the region’s political status.

As the situation continues to evolve, the implications of the court’s ruling could have significant effects on the governance and autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir.

Source: Original article

Trump Urges Grassley to Address Democrats on Judicial Nominee Blockages

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

President Trump criticized the Senate’s blue slip tradition, claiming it undermines his judicial appointment powers and calling for a change in how nominees are handled.

President Donald Trump expressed strong discontent with the Senate’s “blue slip” tradition during a recent statement, labeling it an unconstitutional barrier to his appointment powers. He argued that this practice effectively grants Democrats veto power over his judicial nominees and U.S. attorney appointments.

Trump’s remarks came on Sunday as he highlighted his frustrations, stating that his rights have been “completely taken away” in states with a single Democratic senator. This assertion underscores his belief that the blue slip process hinders his ability to nominate judges and U.S. Attorneys effectively.

U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, who has defended the century-old blue slip tradition, views it as an essential norm that ensures balance and state input in the judicial nomination process. Grassley’s position reflects a commitment to preserving a system that has been in place for many years, despite Trump’s criticisms.

The blue slip tradition allows senators to express their approval or disapproval of a judicial nominee from their state. While it is a long-standing custom, it is not enshrined in law. Constitutionally, the president has the authority to nominate candidates, but the Senate retains the ultimate power to approve or reject those nominations.

Trump’s dissatisfaction with the blue slip practice is not a new development. Back in July, he referred to the tradition as a “hoax” and a “scam” that Democrats use to obstruct his nominees. He urged Grassley to cease supporting such practices, arguing that they prevent the president from appointing his preferred candidates.

In a pointed statement, Trump remarked, “Put simply, the president of the United States will never be permitted to appoint the person of his choice because of an ancient, and probably unconstitutional, ‘CUSTOM.’” His comments reflect a growing impatience with the nomination process, particularly as he seeks to fill judicial vacancies.

During his first term, Trump successfully appointed 234 federal judges, including three Supreme Court justices and 54 appellate court judges. However, his current term has seen a significant slowdown, with only five confirmations in the first seven months.

In his recent comments, Trump suggested that he is willing to exert pressure on Grassley and the Senate to expedite the nomination process. He stated, “The only candidates that I can get confirmed for these most important positions are, believe it or not, Democrats! Chuck Grassley should allow strong Republican candidates to ascend to these very vital and powerful roles, and tell the Democrats, as they often tell us, to go to HELL!”

These remarks come on the heels of a ruling by U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann, which determined that Alina Habba had unlawfully served as acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey beyond the 120-day limit set for temporary prosecutors. This ruling highlighted the administration’s use of unconventional methods to maintain her position.

Trump’s ongoing pressure campaign could significantly influence the number of judicial vacancies he is able to fill in the coming months, as he continues to advocate for a more streamlined nomination process.

Source: Original article

Pritzker Accuses Trump of Manufacturing Crisis Amid National Guard Deployment

Staff ReporterNation, Politics 0

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker criticized President Trump for attempting to “manufacture a crisis” amid reports of a potential National Guard deployment to Chicago.

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, a Democrat, has stated that there is currently no emergency in the state, responding to reports that the federal government may deploy the National Guard to Chicago to combat crime. Pritzker accused President Donald Trump of trying to “manufacture a crisis” to further his political agenda.

In a statement released on Saturday, Pritzker emphasized that the State of Illinois has not received any requests for assistance from the federal government, nor has it made any requests for federal intervention. This announcement follows Trump’s recent efforts to increase the presence of federal law enforcement in Washington, D.C., aimed at reducing crime in the capital.

As part of this initiative, hundreds of federal agents and National Guard troops have been deployed to the streets of Washington, D.C. Now, Trump has indicated that Chicago could be the next target for a federal crackdown on crime.

According to reports from The Washington Post, the Pentagon has been planning a military deployment to Chicago for several weeks, which could involve mobilizing a few thousand National Guard troops as early as next month.

“The safety of the people of Illinois is always my top priority,” Pritzker remarked. “There is no emergency that warrants the President of the United States federalizing the Illinois National Guard, deploying the National Guard from other states, or sending active duty military within our own borders.”

Pritzker further accused Trump of attempting to politicize the military and distract from the challenges faced by working families. “We will continue to follow the law, stand up for the sovereignty of our state, and protect the people of Illinois,” he stated.

Illinois Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton also weighed in on the situation, asserting that Trump’s potential deployment of federal troops in Chicago demonstrates his willingness to create chaos for political gain. “As Lieutenant Governor and throughout my career, I’ve fervently fought for the reformation of our criminal legal system, and under the Pritzker-Stratton administration, we’ve made tremendous progress,” she said. “Crime in Chicago is declining, and there’s absolutely no rationale for this decision, other than to distract from the pain Trump is inflicting on working families with his dangerous agenda.”

Stratton emphasized that both she and Pritzker are committed to protecting the rights and freedoms of Illinois residents against any “storms of hate and fear” that may arise.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, also a Democrat, expressed concerns about the potential deployment of the National Guard, stating that it could exacerbate tensions between residents and law enforcement. “An unlawful deployment of the [National Guard] would be unsustainable and would threaten to undermine the historic progress we have made,” Johnson said in a statement on Friday. He noted that data indicates a significant decline in homicides, robberies, and shootings over the past year.

The ongoing debate over the potential National Guard deployment highlights the differing perspectives on how to address crime in Chicago and the broader implications of federal intervention in local matters.

Source: Original article

More Than One-Third of Rajya Sabha Members to Retire by November 26

Staff ReporterPolitics 0

More than one-third of Rajya Sabha members are set to retire by November 2026, prompting significant political shifts influenced by upcoming state elections.

New Delhi: The Rajya Sabha is poised for substantial changes in the coming months, with over one-third of its members scheduled to retire within the next year. Between March and June 2026, 57 members will complete their terms, and by November, that number will rise to 69, reshaping the composition of the Upper House at a politically critical juncture.

The results of the forthcoming elections in Bihar and West Bengal will play a crucial role in determining whether prominent members, particularly from the opposition, will be renewed or retired. The opposition coalition, known as the INDIA bloc, may face challenges in renominating some of its members if it performs poorly in these states, given its weaker vote bank compared to the National Democratic Alliance (NDA).

The first notable exit will be Ranjan Gogoi, a nominated member and former Chief Justice of India, whose six-year term concludes on March 16, 2026. Following this, a significant batch of retirements will occur in April 2026, with 37 members stepping down from various states. This group includes notable figures such as Ramdas Athawale (Republican Party of India – Athawale, Maharashtra), Sharad Pawar (NCP – Sharadchandra Pawar, Maharashtra), and Priyanka Chaturvedi (Shiv Sena – UBT, Maharashtra), among others.

In Tamil Nadu, the retirement of DMK leaders Tiruchi Siva, Kanimozhi NVN Somu, N.R. Elango, Anthiyur P. Selvarasu, and M. Thambidurai (AIADMK) will be significant. West Bengal will see the departure of TMC members Subrata Bakshi, Ritabrata Banerjee, Bikash Saket Gokhale, and Mausam Noor, along with Ranjan Bhattacharyya from CPIM. Odisha will lose Niranjan Bishi and Muzibulla Khan (BJD), as well as Sujeet Kumar and Mamata Mohanta (both BJP).

Other prominent names in this batch include Bhagwat Karad and Dhairyashil Mohan Patil (BJP, Maharashtra), Rajani Patil (Congress, Maharashtra), and Kiran Choudhry (BJP, Haryana). By June 2026, an additional 22 members will finish their terms, including political veterans such as H.D. Deve Gowda (JD-S, Karnataka), Mallikarjun Kharge (Congress, Karnataka), and Digvijaya Singh (Congress, Madhya Pradesh).

Andhra Pradesh will experience a significant turnover with the exits of Ayodhya Rami Reddy, Parimal Nathwani, and Subhas Chandra Bose Pilli (all YSRCP), along with Sana Sathish Babu (TDP). Gujarat will see the retirement of Narhari Amin (BJP), Ramilaben Bara (BJP), Shaktisinh Gohil (Congress), and Mokariya Rambhai (BJP). In Rajasthan, Neeraj Dangi (Congress), Rajendra Gehlot (BJP), and Ravneet Singh (BJP) will step down. Karnataka will lose Iranna Kadadi (BJP) and Narayana Koragappa (BJP), while members from other states, including Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, and Jharkhand, will also retire.

In July 2026, Vanlalvena of the Mizo National Front will retire from Mizoram. The final wave of retirements will occur in November 2026, when 11 members from Uttar Pradesh will step down. This group includes senior figures such as Hardeep Singh Puri (BJP), Ram Gopal Yadav (Samajwadi Party), and several others from the BJP.

The party-wise breakdown reveals the magnitude of this turnover. The BJP accounts for approximately 31 of the 69 vacancies, with members retiring from its strongholds in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Odisha, Assam, Haryana, and Himachal Pradesh. The Congress is set to lose at least eight members, including some of its most prominent leaders in the Upper House. The DMK, AITC, and YSRCP will also face significant changes, while smaller parties may find themselves in a more precarious position.

Uttar Pradesh will experience the largest turnover, with 11 members retiring in November 2026. Other states, including Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Bihar, West Bengal, Odisha, Gujarat, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh, will also see substantial vacancies, creating a ripple effect across both national and regional politics.

Despite the large number of outgoing members, the BJP is well-positioned to retain most of its seats and potentially gain more, thanks to its dominance in state assemblies across northern, western, and northeastern India. In contrast, the Congress faces the risk of net losses in states like Gujarat, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh, where it lacks the necessary MLA numbers to ensure the return of all its retiring members. The DMK and Trinamool Congress are likely to maintain their seats due to their strong control in Tamil Nadu and West Bengal, respectively.

Smaller parties, however, appear more vulnerable. The NCP (Sharad faction) and Shiv Sena (UBT) members from Maharashtra, AIADMK’s M. Thambidurai from Tamil Nadu, and Ramji of the Bahujan Samaj Party from Uttar Pradesh are almost certain to lose their seats. The BSP, with only one MLA in the UP Assembly, faces a bleak future in the Rajya Sabha unless an extraordinary cross-party arrangement occurs. The JD-S risks losing H.D. Deve Gowda’s seat in Karnataka, while the BRS may lose its single seat in Telangana following its Assembly defeat.

These retirements will result in nearly one-third of the 245-member Rajya Sabha being reconstituted by the end of November 2026. The elections to fill these seats will be closely monitored, as they will not only impact the legislative arithmetic of the Centre but also shape the bargaining power of regional parties ahead of the next general election cycle. This churn could potentially eliminate some parties entirely from the Upper House while solidifying the BJP’s dominance.

Source: Original article

Delhi Assembly Gears Up for Upcoming Speakers’ Conference

Staff ReporterNation, Politics 0

The Delhi Assembly is set to host the All India Speakers’ Conference in 2025, commemorating the centenary of Vitthalbhai Patel’s election as the first Indian Speaker of the Central Legislative Assembly.

New Delhi: A high-level preparatory meeting was held earlier this week at the Delhi Legislative Assembly, chaired by Hon’ble Speaker Vijender Gupta. The meeting focused on the arrangements for the upcoming All India Speakers’ Conference, scheduled for August 24–25, 2025.

The two-day national conference will be inaugurated by Hon’ble Union Home Minister Amit Shah, with the valedictory address delivered by Hon’ble Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla. The event is expected to attract a wide array of dignitaries, including the Hon’ble Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, Chairpersons and Deputy Chairpersons of Legislative Councils and Assemblies, several Hon’ble Union Cabinet Ministers, and other distinguished guests from across the country.

This year’s conference holds special historical significance as it marks the centenary of Shri Vitthalbhai Jhaverbhai Patel’s election on August 24, 1925, as the first Indian President (Speaker) of the Central Legislative Assembly. This milestone is recognized as a pivotal moment in India’s democratic evolution. To honor this occasion, a dedicated exhibition and a specially curated documentary will be unveiled during the conference, showcasing Patel’s remarkable life, leadership, and contributions to the nation.

During the preparatory meeting, Commissioner of Police S.B.K. Singh assured Speaker Vijender Gupta that comprehensive security arrangements and robust protocol management will be implemented to ensure the smooth conduct of the event. He noted that every visiting dignitary will be granted State Guest status and will receive assistance from Delhi Police protocol and security officers throughout their stay. This includes arrangements from their arrival at the airport to their accommodation at the Taj Hotel, as well as all movements to and from the Assembly premises, which will be monitored meticulously.

The inspection also included a joint on-site assessment of the Assembly complex, where senior officials closely reviewed the venue’s preparedness. Special attention was given to the management of entry and exit points, seating and layout design, traffic regulation and diversion plans, and the functioning of emergency protocols to ensure seamless proceedings.

Following the review, Speaker Vijender Gupta expressed confidence that the Delhi Legislative Assembly Secretariat has implemented all essential measures for the successful organization of this landmark national event. He stated that the All India Speakers’ Conference 2025 would “create a memorable legacy and leave a profound imprint on the parliamentary traditions and democratic ethos of India.”

Source: Original article

British Foreign Secretary Faces Backlash Over Fishing Trip with JD Vance

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy faced scrutiny after receiving a warning for fishing without a license during a visit with U.S. Vice President JD Vance at his country estate.

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy recently found himself in a bit of trouble after a fishing trip with U.S. Vice President JD Vance. The issue arose not from the discussions between the two politicians, but rather from a violation of fishing regulations.

According to the Environment Agency, Lammy received a written warning for fishing without a license. This incident came to light on Friday, following the visit where Lammy had invited Vance and his family to his country estate located south of London. The trip included a photo opportunity at a nearby river, as well as a bilateral meeting to discuss various international issues.

In the UK, anyone over the age of 13 is required to possess a fishing license to fish in freshwater. The Environment Agency did not disclose whether Vance had a fishing license, citing privacy concerns. However, had Lammy been fined for the violation, he could have faced a penalty of nearly $4,000.

In response to the warning, Lammy promptly purchased a fishing license and reported the incident to the agency. A spokesperson for Lammy characterized the situation as an “administrative error.”

During the fishing trip, Lammy had previously shared with reporters that Vance offered him “Kentucky-style” fishing tips. Despite this advice, Lammy was unable to catch any fish, which Vance humorously noted, saying, “The one strain on the special relationship is that all of my kids caught fish, but the foreign secretary did not.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to both Vance and the Environment Agency for further comment on the matter.

This incident highlights the importance of adhering to local regulations, even for high-profile officials, and serves as a reminder of the potential consequences of overlooking such requirements.

Source: Original article

Ajit Agarkar Faces Scrutiny Over Shubman Gill’s Asia Cup Selection

Staff ReporterCricket, Election, Sports 0

Shubman Gill’s selection as vice-captain for the Asia Cup has sparked debate, given his lack of recent T20I appearances despite a stellar performance in the England Test series.

Shubman Gill has been named vice-captain for the upcoming Asia Cup, a decision that has raised eyebrows among cricket analysts and fans alike. Despite not having played in T20 Internationals recently, Gill’s impressive form in the Test arena has caught the attention of selectors.

During the recent Test series against England, Gill showcased his batting prowess, amassing over 750 runs. His performance included several match-winning innings, which solidified his reputation as a key player in the longer format of the game. However, the transition from Tests to T20s can be challenging, and some critics question the wisdom of selecting a player who has not been active in the T20 format lately.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) selectors have faced scrutiny for their choices in recent tournaments, with many arguing that past performances in one format do not necessarily guarantee success in another. Gill’s selection as vice-captain has reignited discussions about the criteria used by the selectors when forming the squad.

Supporters of Gill argue that his exceptional Test form should not be overlooked, and that his ability to adapt to different formats could prove beneficial for the team. They point to his technical skills and temperament, which are vital in high-pressure situations typical of international tournaments.

On the other hand, critics emphasize the importance of recent form in the T20 format, suggesting that players who have consistently performed in T20s should be prioritized. This perspective highlights the need for selectors to balance experience with current performance metrics when choosing a squad for a major competition like the Asia Cup.

The debate surrounding Gill’s selection reflects broader concerns about the BCCI’s approach to team selection. As the Asia Cup approaches, all eyes will be on how the team performs, and whether Gill can translate his Test success into the shorter format of the game.

As cricket fans await the tournament, the discussions around player selection are likely to continue, with many eager to see if Gill can rise to the occasion and justify the selectors’ faith in him.

According to NDTV, the conversation surrounding Gill’s selection is emblematic of the ongoing challenges faced by the BCCI selectors in balancing past performances with current form.

Source: Original article

The Mystery of Mysterious Shipment Emails in Your Inbox

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, Technology 0

Receiving unexpected order confirmations may indicate that your email address is being exploited in fraudulent operations targeting various retailers.

In recent months, an increasing number of individuals have reported receiving shipment confirmation emails for purchases they did not make. These emails typically originate from legitimate retailers, often in the sportswear or electronics sectors, and include real tracking numbers and delivery details. However, the products are shipped to different names and addresses, while the buyer’s contact email is the recipient’s.

This phenomenon might initially appear to be a simple clerical error or a case of someone mistyping an email address. Yet, when it occurs repeatedly across multiple unrelated orders, it raises concerns about a more sinister tactic at play. Arthur, a resident of Cape Coral, Florida, shared his experience, which reflects the frustrations of many others: “My wife’s email address is showing up in emails from various sports entities to notify her of shipping dates, etc. So far, three separate individuals have ordered products, shipped to a different name at a different address, but used her email as the contact. They didn’t use our credit card to place the order. What could be going on? I don’t believe it’s a coincidence.”

Arthur’s suspicions are well-founded. Scammers are increasingly using real email addresses to facilitate fraudulent purchases through retailer systems that have fewer verification checks. They exploit the trust associated with legitimate email addresses to carry out their schemes, even if they have not compromised the victim’s payment details.

It is improbable that someone is accidentally entering your email address every single time. Instead, scammers are deliberately using valid, active email addresses to circumvent retailer fraud filters. Numerous sources indicate that fake order and shipping confirmation emails are a common tactic in fraud operations, with criminals taking advantage of the trust systems built around legitimate email addresses.

When a stolen credit card is used, pairing it with a real email address that has not triggered spam alerts significantly increases the likelihood that the transaction will go unnoticed by anti-fraud systems. Retailers often verify whether an email address is active or bounces. If the system detects a functioning address, it may be less suspicious than an obviously fake one.

Once an order is placed, products are frequently sent to drop addresses or freight-forwarding services, as confirmed by official investigations into brushing scams. These services act as intermediaries, complicating the tracing of fraudulent activities. In this context, your email serves merely as a means to an end—a validated contact point that aids the operation’s progression.

Your email address may have fallen into the hands of scammers through several common methods. The most likely cause is a data breach. Many well-known companies have experienced leaks where customer emails and other information were exposed. Once your email is part of a leaked database, it often circulates on the dark web or in underground forums, where it is traded and reused. Even if you were not directly involved in a breach, scammers frequently employ a technique known as credential stuffing. This method involves testing stolen login details across various websites to confirm which email addresses are active.

To mitigate the risk of falling victim to such scams, consider investing in a data removal service. While no service can guarantee the complete removal of your data from the internet, these services can help monitor and automate the process of removing your information from numerous sites over time.

Implementing a few straightforward yet effective measures can help protect your inbox, safeguard your identity, and stay ahead of scammers misusing your email. Start by securing your email account with a strong, unique password that you do not reuse elsewhere. Enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) adds an extra layer of security, ensuring that hackers cannot access your account even if they have stolen your password. A password manager can simplify this process by generating and securely storing complex passwords, reducing the risks associated with password reuse.

Regularly check if your email has been exposed in past breaches. Many password managers include built-in breach scanners that can alert you if your email address or passwords have appeared in known leaks. If you discover a match, promptly change any reused passwords and secure those accounts with new, unique credentials.

Periodically scan your inbox for order confirmations, shipping notices, or account sign-ups that you do not recognize. If something seems suspicious, report it directly to the retailer or platform, as it may be part of a larger scam utilizing your email address. Avoid clicking on dubious links, even if the message appears legitimate, and protect your devices with robust antivirus software to catch threats before they escalate.

To further safeguard yourself from malicious links that could install malware and compromise your private information, ensure that you have antivirus software installed on all your devices. This protection can also alert you to phishing emails and ransomware scams, keeping your personal information and digital assets secure.

Avoid entering your email on questionable giveaway sites or dubious online forms. When in doubt, skip the sign-up or use a temporary email address. The fewer places your email is exposed, the more challenging it becomes for scammers to access it.

Consider establishing a dedicated email account for online purchases, newsletters, and subscriptions. This approach helps keep your primary inbox organized and makes it easier to identify unusual activity. Creating various email aliases can also be beneficial, allowing you to manage incoming communications while minimizing the risk of data breaches. An email alias can forward messages to your primary address, simplifying your email management.

Even if no purchases appear under your name, receiving order confirmations for items you did not buy can be a warning sign of potential identity theft. Set up alerts with your bank and consider enrolling in a credit monitoring service to detect unauthorized activity early.

If you are receiving order confirmations for items you did not purchase, do not dismiss it as a mere inconvenience. Your email is likely being misused as part of a larger fraud operation, not by accident but intentionally. Scammers are capitalizing on active, trustworthy email addresses to slip past retailer defenses and execute unauthorized purchases. The repeated use of your email indicates that fraud networks are already circulating it, even if your financial information remains secure.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Second Term Could Lead to Extreme Immigration Overhaul

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Politics 0

New report reveals that the Trump administration’s recent immigration policies threaten the foundations of American democracy, marking a significant overhaul of the U.S. immigration system.

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 23, 2025 — A special report released today provides a comprehensive analysis of the Trump administration’s first six months back in office, highlighting a dramatic transformation of the U.S. immigration system that poses a serious threat to the foundations of American democracy. While some voters may have favored a tougher stance on immigration when supporting Trump, the report illustrates how the administration’s extreme measures extend far beyond mere policy changes, undermining the rule of law itself.

Titled *Mass Deportation: Analyzing the Trump Administration’s Attacks on Immigrants, Democracy, and America*, the report was published by the American Immigration Council on July 23. It details how the administration has launched a radical, multi-faceted assault on immigrants and the immigration system.

The report outlines a series of aggressive actions that include restricting entry into the United States, removing legal protections for individuals already residing in the country, and escalating enforcement efforts to unprecedented levels. In doing so, the Trump administration has dismantled long-standing legal safeguards, disregarded the authority of Congress and the judiciary, and weaponized government resources against immigrants and dissenters alike.

“This isn’t just a hardline immigration agenda,” said Nayna Gupta, policy director at the American Immigration Council and co-author of the report. “It’s a wholesale effort to use immigrants and the U.S. immigration system to attack core tenets of our democracy and exercise unchecked executive power to realign the American government around exclusion and fear.”

Among the key findings highlighted in the report are several alarming developments:

The end of asylum has effectively occurred, with the administration shutting down the CBP One application without offering any alternative. Asylum-seekers arriving at ports of entry are routinely turned away, and many face indefinite detention even after winning their cases.

The refugee program has been decimated, with the administration indefinitely suspending the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, except for a select group of white South Africans who have been fast-tracked under questionable claims of persecution. This has left tens of thousands of approved refugees stranded abroad.

A mass revocation of legal status has taken place, with the administration aggressively rescinding humanitarian parole and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) from over a million individuals in just six months. This has stripped many of their work permits and pushed them into undocumented status.

The administration has also weaponized bureaucracy, creating significant obstacles for legal immigration pathways through massive fee increases, processing freezes, and opaque barriers that make it nearly impossible for lawful applicants to obtain or maintain their status.

The aggressive enforcement tactics employed by the Trump administration have instilled a pervasive atmosphere of fear and chaos among immigrants of all legal statuses. Individuals now live in constant anxiety over their safety in the United States, as anyone can be targeted for arrest, detention, and deportation, even in sensitive locations such as churches, schools, and courthouses.

Furthermore, the administration is orchestrating a radical reorganization of law enforcement resources, establishing an unprecedented cross-agency immigration operation that draws on manpower from various federal and state law enforcement agencies and the U.S. military. This effort prioritizes immigration enforcement above all other public safety and law enforcement objectives.

Additionally, the Trump administration’s “Big Beautiful Bill Act,” enacted in July, has turbocharged an already inhumane detention system by increasing ICE’s detention budget by 308 percent annually. This sets the stage for a drastic expansion of a detention system that has already subjected tens of thousands of immigrants to life-threatening conditions.

The report also includes powerful firsthand accounts from individuals affected by these policies. Ilia, a nonbinary Russian dissident, won their asylum case in court but remained in detention for over a year without a release date. Axel, a DACA recipient and youth leader, is abandoning his job to return to school amid uncertainty regarding his legal status. Beatriz, an immigrant lawyer advocating for noncitizen children, has encountered cases reminiscent of her own journey to the U.S., including a confused six-year-old who appeared in court without representation. Kaelyn is incurring debt to prevent her partner from being deported to El Salvador’s megaprison under the Alien Enemies Act.

The report warns that while some policies may shift in response to legal challenges, the administration’s overarching agenda remains clear: to permanently redefine who belongs in America and how power is wielded by the federal government.

“The administration’s policies are reshaping the immigration system in ways that are unfair, unlawful, and out of step with core American values,” said Dara Lind, senior fellow at the Council and co-author of the report. “We’re witnessing real harm to families, communities, and the rule of law, and the public deserves to understand what’s at stake.”

The full report is available for review, and interviews with experts and individuals impacted by these policies can also be arranged.

Source: Original article

Bhisham Sahni’s ‘Tamas’ Explores the Roots of Awful Events

Staff ReporterCulture, Election, Politics 0

Bhisham Sahni’s novel ‘Tamas’ serves as a poignant reminder of how easily communal violence can erupt, reflecting on the tragic history of the Indian Partition.

“History repeats itself, first as tragedy, and then as farce.” This famous quote by Karl Marx encapsulates the essence of Bhisham Sahni’s 1979 award-winning novel, Tamas. The book is a dark satire that explores the horrific riots that erupted during the partition of India and Pakistan, a tumultuous period marked by violence and chaos as the British colonial rule came to an end after nearly 200 years.

Despite being published over four decades ago, Tamas remains strikingly relevant in today’s political climate. The recurring themes of human hubris, greed, and the manipulation of communal identities resonate deeply in contemporary society. As tensions rise in various parts of the world, Sahni’s work serves as a cautionary tale about the ease with which communities can be pitted against one another.

Recently reprinted by Penguin Classics and translated by Daisy Rockwell, Tamas includes an insightful introduction that sheds light on Sahni’s motivations for writing the novel. He penned this poignant narrative thirty years after experiencing the brutal riots of partition firsthand, aiming to highlight the cyclical nature of violence and hatred.

Tamas chronicles the slow build-up to a communal riot in a small town in Northern India, set against the backdrop of partition. The story ignites with the butchering of a hog, an act that serves as a catalyst for the ensuing chaos. As the narrative unfolds, readers are struck by the parallels between the events depicted in the novel and the current global landscape, where political leaders exploit religious and communal loyalties for their gain.

Interestingly, the novel lacks a central character to anchor the plot. Instead, the riot itself emerges as the primary protagonist, illustrating how violence can arise from seemingly innocuous beginnings, much like a tornado forming out of a clear sky.

In her introduction, Rockwell notes that Sahni was compelled to write Tamas due to witnessing the cycle of hatred he had lived through during partition, which continued to manifest in communal riots in independent India. “The unseen hands may change, the location may change, the match that lights the tinder may change, but the formula remains chillingly familiar,” she writes. The novel offers profound insights into the fallacy of viewing riots as spontaneous events. Whether in Lahore or Washington, D.C., riots are rooted in decades of institutional violence and social injustice.

The narrative begins with Nathu, a local chamar, who is reluctantly tasked with butchering a hog. Despite the financial incentive, Nathu is unprepared for the gruesome task, which sets off a chain reaction of events that will alter the lives of many in the town. Sahni’s ability to weave dark humor into the grim subject matter allows readers to engage with the story without being overwhelmed by despair.

Throughout the novel, Sahni introduces a diverse cast of characters, each contributing to the unfolding drama. Among them are the British administrator Richard, whose manipulative nature exacerbates tensions; his wife Lisa, who struggles with her own demons; and members of the local Congress Committee and Muslim League, who represent the polarized political landscape. The narrative also features the well-meaning but ultimately ineffective Communist volunteer, Deb, who attempts to bridge the divide between the feuding factions.

As friendships that once flourished crumble under the weight of suspicion and misinformation, the novel illustrates how quickly trust can erode. The Hindu and Muslim communities, once neighbors and allies, find themselves at odds, fueled by rumors and the machinations of those in power. The British administrators exploit these divisions to their advantage, creating an atmosphere ripe for conflict.

The conclusion of Tamas provides a darkly comedic commentary on human nature, revealing the absurdities people employ to mask their guilt and erase painful memories. Despite the serious subject matter, Sahni’s sharp wit shines through, prompting readers to reflect on the complexities of human behavior in times of crisis.

In an era where there are concerted efforts to rewrite history, books like Tamas are more important than ever. They illuminate the mechanisms that can ignite violence and the fragility of peace, reminding us of the lessons that must not be forgotten.

TAMAS
By Bhisham Sahni
Translated with an Introduction by Daisy Rockwell
Foreword by Siddhartha Deb
Penguin Classics Trade Paperback (July 15, 2025)
ISBN: 9780143138051

Bhisham Sahni received the Sahitya Kala Academy award for Tamas in 1975. The novel was also adapted into a multi-episode series for India’s government-run television platform, Doordarshan, captivating audiences, particularly in Northern India, where the impact of partition was most acutely felt. The series, directed by Govind Nihalani and featuring Om Puri as Nathu, was later released as a four-hour feature film available on YouTube.

Source: Original article

Pallavi Joshi Analyzes Mithun Chakraborty’s Political Journey in India

Staff ReporterElection, India, Politics 0

Actress-producer Pallavi Joshi reflects on her experiences with veteran actor Mithun Chakraborty, highlighting his multifaceted career and surprising political insights.

MUMBAI – Actress and producer Pallavi Joshi is eagerly anticipating the release of her upcoming film, ‘The Bengal Files’. In a recent discussion, she shared her experiences working alongside the veteran actor Mithun Chakraborty.

Joshi described Chakraborty as an enigma, noting that she perceives three distinct personalities within him. “There is a disco dancer. Then there is an actor who has been performing roles like Ramkrishna Paramhansa. And then there was a beautiful film I had seen of his called ‘Titli’, which was directed by Aparna Sen. He was amazing in that film,” she stated.

She emphasized Chakraborty’s versatility as a star, acknowledging his deep understanding of his craft. “He did not really care about acting so much in those films, just concentrated more on his dance and everything. And then there are some films which he has done purely for money. And yet, there is also that actor who won the National Award for ‘Mrigya’. He’s a three-time national award winner. For somebody who has gone the full spectrum, there is so much to learn from him,” Joshi said.

Joshi expressed her admiration for Chakraborty, who was recently honored with the Dadasaheb Phalke Award, India’s highest accolade in cinema. She remarked, “His entire demeanor is that of a star. So, when he sits down and starts talking, it’s Mithun Chakraborty, the star who’s sitting there in front of you. When he opens his mouth, it is a very well-read person who speaks to you. And then when he starts telling you a few things about what you should be doing in this film, it’s that cinematic nerd inside him who understands cinema so well. He’s giving you those suggestions.”

Chakraborty’s political journey has also been noteworthy, spanning the full spectrum from left to right. He was involved in the Naxalbari movement during his youth but distanced himself from it following a family crisis. After graduating from the Film and Television Institute of India, he rose to superstardom and ventured into politics, initially joining the Trinamool Congress (TMC), a party positioned at the center-left of the political spectrum. He later transitioned to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), a right-wing political entity.

While Joshi has not engaged in extensive discussions with Chakraborty regarding politics, she has been impressed by what she has heard. “He surprises me with his deep understanding of cinema. Politics, of course, I’ve never really had a chance to discuss with him. I’m not really very interested in that aspect. But I’m sure he’s had conversations with Vivek. I’ve overheard some of them. And I’m just blown away by that man. And to have him as your co-actor in the same frame, it sometimes feels surreal,” she added.

As ‘The Bengal Files’ prepares for its release, Joshi’s reflections on Chakraborty highlight not only his artistic talents but also the depth of his character and experiences.

Source: Original article

Debate Over D.C. Statehood Intensifies Amid Trump’s Local Police Authority

Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Democrats are renewing calls for Washington D.C. statehood as President Trump asserts control over the district’s police force, reigniting a long-standing debate about representation and governance.

The debate over Washington D.C. statehood has intensified as President Donald Trump continues to exert authority over the district’s police force. This situation has prompted House and Senate Democrats, along with D.C.’s non-voting delegates, to argue that if D.C. were a state, the president would not have the power to federalize its police force.

Last week, Trump invoked a provision of the Home Rule Act, which grants some autonomy to the nation’s capital, to effectively take control of the Metropolitan Police Department. This move was framed as a response to rising crime rates, leading to an increased presence of federal law enforcement agencies and the National Guard on the streets of D.C. The White House has highlighted rapid decreases in crime and numerous arrests since the federal takeover.

However, critics argue that the president’s actions represent an overreach of power and underscore the need for D.C. to achieve statehood. Currently, Washington D.C. lacks voting representation in Congress and is overseen by Congress despite having its own mayor and city council. Senator Paul Strauss, the district’s shadow senator, emphasized that if D.C. were a state, the president would not be able to impose such control outside of the federal enclave.

Strauss, who has long advocated for D.C. statehood, expressed concern that the current crackdown ignores the self-determination of D.C. residents. “It would be one thing if we actually had a crime emergency here, but we don’t,” he stated. “Violent crime in particular is down to 30-year lows. That’s not what’s happening here. He is using these national guardsmen and women as a stunt, and that’s wrong.”

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D.C.’s non-voting delegate in the House, echoed Strauss’s sentiments. “The president’s abuses are evidence of the urgent need for D.C. statehood so that more than 700,000 D.C. residents can finally have the full rights and privileges afforded to other Americans, including control of their own local resources and policies,” she said in a statement.

In response, White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers countered that violent crime in the district has “been spiraling out of control.” She accused Democrats of misleading the public regarding crime levels in the nation’s capital. “If they needed some anecdotal evidence, they could ask their own Democrat colleague about the time he was carjacked outside of his D.C. apartment by three armed criminals,” she remarked.

Lawmakers from neighboring Virginia and Maryland joined Strauss and Norton in arguing that Trump’s federalization of the local police highlights the urgent need for D.C. statehood. Senator Tim Kaine, D-Va., described the police takeover as a prime example of why D.C. deserves the same rights as states. Senator Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., criticized Republicans for playing political games with the district’s funding while supporting what he termed an authoritarian overreach by the president.

Van Hollen has announced plans to reintroduce a bill alongside Norton to grant statehood to D.C. He, Norton, and Representative Jamie Raskin, D-Md., have also introduced a joint resolution in the House aimed at halting Trump’s takeover of the D.C. police.

Raskin pointed out that residents of Washington D.C. are uniquely disenfranchised, being the only citizens in a capital city worldwide without representation in their national legislature. “The people of Washington have petitioned for statehood and should be admitted as a state rather than treated as a MAGA-colonized populace,” he stated.

Despite the renewed push for statehood, the likelihood of achieving this goal remains slim while Republicans control both chambers of Congress and the presidency. Strauss noted, “I think there’s probably not a pathway to get this done while Republicans control all three branches of the government. They have shown that they’re more interested in the partisan impact of controlling the legislative branch and not really interested in the principle of self-determination for Washington, D.C. residents.”

The ongoing debate over D.C. statehood continues to reflect broader issues of representation and governance in the United States, with many advocates arguing that the residents of the nation’s capital deserve the same rights as those in the states.

Source: Original article

Government Takes Over 215 Schools Associated with Jamaat-e-Islami

Staff ReporterEducation, Nation, Politics 0

The Jammu and Kashmir Government has taken over 215 schools linked to the banned Jamaat-e-Islami and Falah-e-Aam Trust to ensure uninterrupted education for students under new management.

Srinagar: In a decisive action aimed at protecting the educational future of thousands of children, the Jammu and Kashmir Government has ordered the takeover of 215 schools associated with the proscribed Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) and its affiliate, the Falah-e-Aam Trust (FAT).

This directive was issued on Friday, following notifications from the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, which declared Jamaat-e-Islami as an unlawful association under Section 3(1) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. The notifications, S.O.1069(E) dated February 28, 2019, and S.O.924(E) dated February 27, 2024, provided the legal framework for this action.

The government order indicated that intelligence agencies had identified several schools that were either directly or indirectly affiliated with the banned organization. Reports from these agencies highlighted concerns regarding the validity of the managing committees of the 215 schools, which had reportedly expired.

To ensure the academic continuity for students enrolled in these institutions, the government has mandated that the management of the schools be taken over by the respective District Magistrates and Deputy Commissioners. These officials are tasked with proposing new managing committees after thorough verification.

Additionally, the District Magistrates and Deputy Commissioners are instructed to collaborate closely with the School Education Department to guarantee that the academic careers of students remain unaffected during this transition period.

The government has emphasized the importance of maintaining quality education in accordance with the National Education Policy (NEP) norms. This initiative is part of a broader strategy to mitigate the influence of banned organizations in Jammu and Kashmir while ensuring that students are not disadvantaged by the administrative changes.

This takeover reflects the government’s commitment to safeguarding the educational landscape in the region amidst ongoing challenges.

Source: Original article

CBI Detains Eight in Connection with Custodial Torture of Kupwara Constable

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, Society 0

The Central Bureau of Investigation has arrested six policemen and two civilians in connection with the custodial torture of a Kupwara constable, following a Supreme Court directive.

Srinagar: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) arrested six policemen, including two officers, along with two civilians on Wednesday. This action is linked to the alleged custodial torture of a police constable at the Joint Interrogation Centre (JIC) in Kupwara, which occurred two years ago.

The arrests were made in compliance with the Supreme Court’s recent directives, which mandated the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) and ordered compensation for the victim. The court condemned the inhumane treatment inflicted on the constable during his illegal detention.

Among those arrested are Deputy Superintendent of Police Aijaz Ahmad Naikoo, Inspector Reyaz Ahmad, and policemen Jehangir Ahmad, Imtiyaz Ahmad, Mohammad Yunis, and Shakir Ahmad, all of whom were stationed at the JIC Kupwara at the time of the incident.

Last month, the apex court strongly criticized the brutality of the case, highlighting medical evidence that indicated severe torture, including mutilation of the constable’s genitalia, fractures, lacerations, and electric shocks. The court directed the CBI to file an FIR against the accused and ordered the Union Territory administration to compensate the victim with ₹50 lakh.

Medical records from the Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) revealed that the victim suffered grievous injuries, including “complete mutilation of genitalia with both testicles removed, laceration on the scrotum, bruises on buttocks, tenderness on palms and feet, multiple vegetative particles in the rectum, and fractures across the body.”

The victim’s wife alleged that her husband, Khursheed, was illegally detained on February 20, 2023, and subjected to six days of brutal torture. She claimed he was left in a critical condition before being transferred to a hospital due to pressure from local residents. “There is no example of such barbaric torture known in the history of mankind,” she stated.

On July 21, the Supreme Court quashed a counter-FIR that had been filed against the constable and announced the ₹50 lakh compensation, which it stated would be recoverable from the officers involved following the CBI investigation.

The court also instructed the CBI to submit a status report by November 10, 2025, noting that the case revealed “a disturbing pattern of systematic cover-up and abuse of authority.” It observed that instead of investigating the custodial torture, local police had filed a false case against the victim under Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code to create a fabricated narrative.

Source: Original article

Taiwan’s Energy Dependence Seen as Vulnerability Amid Chinese Threat

Staff ReporterConflict, Environment, Politics 0

Voters in Taiwan are set to decide on the future of nuclear power as the island grapples with energy vulnerabilities amid increasing threats from China.

On Saturday, voters in Taiwan will head to the polls to determine whether the island should restart its nuclear power capabilities. This decision comes in the wake of Taiwan’s significant energy vulnerabilities, particularly as concerns grow over potential threats from China.

In May, Taiwan shut down the Maanshan Nuclear Power Plant, its last operational nuclear facility. This closure followed a pledge by the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in 2016 to phase out nuclear power by 2025. The decision was largely influenced by fears of nuclear fallout, particularly in light of the 2011 Fukushima disaster in Japan.

Security experts have raised alarms about the implications of this move, suggesting that it further exposes Taiwan to vulnerabilities in the face of Chinese aggression. The island is heavily reliant on energy imports, sourcing a significant portion from the United States, Australia, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar for both liquefied natural gas (LNG) and crude oil.

“Taiwan’s energy dependence is an Achilles heel,” stated Craig Singleton, senior director of the China Program and a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), during a media call following a recent delegation visit to Taiwan. Singleton emphasized that Beijing could exploit Taiwan’s energy vulnerabilities without resorting to military action.

“China can leverage its maritime dominance, its legal warfare, and cyber tools to choke supply and test Taiwan’s political resilience,” he added, highlighting the ease with which China could disrupt trade to the island.

Over the past decade, Taiwan has imported up to 97% of its energy needs, primarily relying on fossil fuels, which account for over 90% of its energy consumption. Renewable sources contribute approximately 7%, according to FDD experts. Before the decision to phase out nuclear energy, it had been a significant source of power, providing nearly 12% of Taiwan’s energy needs in 2011. However, by 2021, this figure had decreased to roughly 9.5%, and by the following year, it had fallen to just over 4% before being completely eliminated this year.

While some countries, particularly in Europe, are turning to nuclear power as a solution to reduce reliance on carbon-emitting fuels amid climate change concerns, others, like Germany, have adopted a strong anti-nuclear stance. This shift was influenced by the catastrophic consequences of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, which had far-reaching effects across Europe. In 2023, Germany also phased out nuclear power entirely, but Taiwan faces unique security challenges that Germany does not.

Opponents of nuclear energy have pointed to recent wartime scenarios that highlight the risks associated with active nuclear plants, such as during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the conflict over the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. However, experts argue that Taiwan could deplete its oil reserves within weeks or even days if China were to implement a blockade, as reported by DW. Thus, nuclear power could provide Taiwan with a crucial energy storage solution.

“Nuclear power does, in my view, change that calculus, providing a lot of continuity under coercion, and I think it really complicates Beijing’s playbook,” Singleton asserted. He stressed the need for Taiwan to diversify its energy sources to better protect itself against a potential Chinese blockade.

“The U.S. needs to help Taiwan diversify quickly, reduce its reliance on vulnerable suppliers like Qatar, and prepare for a contest of endurance, as I believe that’s how China is approaching this issue,” Singleton noted, referencing Qatar’s relationship with China and its substantial LNG exports to Beijing.

Singleton also pointed to Ukraine as a relevant case study, illustrating how an invading nation can exploit vulnerabilities in a country’s energy sector. “Ukraine shows that energy is one of the fastest ways to undermine a country’s will. Russia targeted power to free cities to fracture cohesion and force concessions,” he explained. “I think Beijing is absolutely studying that playbook.”

As Taiwan prepares for this pivotal referendum, the outcome could have significant implications for its energy strategy and security posture in the face of an increasingly assertive China.

Source: Original article

New Report Details Impact of Expanded Travel Ban on Indian-Americans

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

A new report highlights the significant economic and humanitarian impacts of the Trump administration’s expanded travel ban, which affects immigration from 19 countries.

WASHINGTON, DC, August 6 — A recent report from the American Immigration Council outlines the extensive economic and humanitarian consequences of the Trump administration’s travel ban, enacted in June 2025. This ban restricts immigration from 19 countries and poses a risk of losing $715 million in taxes and $2.5 billion in spending power.

In 2022, nearly 300,000 individuals from the affected countries entered the United States, contributing to critical sectors of the economy and generating substantial tax revenue. “Those affected by this travel ban are students, workers, and family members who pay taxes, support local economies, and fill jobs in industries facing massive shortages. We’re throwing all of that away, to the detriment of our communities and the U.S. economy,” said Nan Wu, research director of the American Immigration Council.

According to 2023 data, of the 300,000 individuals impacted by the travel ban, 82 percent were employed, particularly in industries already grappling with labor shortages, such as hospitality, construction, and manufacturing. The manufacturing sector alone is projected to face a shortage of 1.9 million workers by 2033.

“The United States absolutely needs strong screening procedures to protect national security, but this travel ban isn’t how you do that,” stated Jeremy Robbins, executive director of the American Immigration Council. “The Trump administration is trying to sell this policy as a security measure, but when you dig into the justifications, they don’t add up. Many of the targeted countries had fewer than 500 visa overstays last year. This isn’t about keeping America safe; it’s about keeping certain people out.”

While the 2017 travel ban sparked immediate and widespread public protests, the report notes that the 2025 version has encountered a more subdued response. This muted reaction is largely attributed to the ban’s gradual implementation and the introduction of expanded exemptions. However, the report emphasizes that the resulting damage remains severe.

“This quieter version of the ban is deeply harmful,” Robbins added. “It separates families, blocks international talent, and hurts communities across the country. The absence of airport protests doesn’t mean the harm isn’t real; it’s just happening more quietly and more bureaucratically.”

There are indications that the administration may consider adding an additional 36 countries to the travel ban. Should this occur, tens of thousands more individuals from those nations could be barred from entering the United States, exacerbating the economic, social, and diplomatic repercussions.

The countries currently affected by the travel ban include:

All travel banned:

Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.

Visas sharply restricted:

Venezuela, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, and Turkmenistan.

This report underscores the far-reaching implications of the travel ban, not only for those directly affected but also for the broader U.S. economy and society.

Source: Original article

Ilhan Omar Criticizes Party for Withdrawing Support from Socialist Candidate

Staff ReporterPolitics, USA 0

Rep. Ilhan Omar criticized the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party for revoking its endorsement of mayoral candidate Omar Fateh, calling the decision “inexcusable” and highlighting divisions within the party.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, a prominent member of the progressive House “Squad,” expressed her outrage on Thursday night over the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party’s (DFL) decision to revoke its endorsement of Omar Fateh, a candidate for mayor of Minneapolis.

The DFL cited “substantial failures” in its endorsement convention process as the reason for the reversal. In response, Omar took to social media platform X, stating, “It is inexcusable to overturn the DFL endorsement from Omar Fateh.” She criticized the decision, emphasizing that it was made by a small group of individuals, many of whom do not reside in Minneapolis, who privately convened to override the will of local delegates who had participated in a lengthy endorsement process.

Omar’s condemnation of the DFL’s actions was not an isolated sentiment. She led a coalition of other DFL officials in a letter expressing their strong disapproval of the party’s decision. “Right now, there is a clear tension between the progressive Democrats who are challenging the status quo and moderate Democrats,” the letter stated. The group lamented that Fateh, who is the first Black mayoral candidate to receive DFL endorsement in nearly three decades, would have his endorsement rescinded.

Despite the turmoil, Omar has yet to publicly endorse any candidate in the upcoming mayoral race, which is scheduled for November 2025. Fateh, who identifies as a “democratic socialist,” secured the DFL endorsement after a competitive endorsing convention in July 2025, defeating several other Democratic hopefuls, including the current Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who is seeking a third term.

Fateh’s political stance has drawn comparisons to other democratic socialists, such as Zohran Mamdani, a candidate in New York City. However, DFL Party Chairman Richard Carlbom did not reference Fateh’s political ideology in his statement regarding the revocation of the endorsement.

Omar and other progressive leaders have framed the DFL’s decision as indicative of the ongoing rift within the Democratic Party. “Chair Richard Carlbom campaigned on uniting the DFL; this decision directly runs counter to that effort, to which we are all committed,” Omar remarked. She further asserted that the DFL should be a big-tent party that fairly represents all factions rather than silencing dissenting voices.

Omar concluded her remarks by expressing concern that the party’s decision would discourage and alienate many voters from engaging with the DFL. The Minnesota DFL was contacted for comment, but no response was received by press time.

Source: Original article

Extreme Heat Poses Significant Risks for Vulnerable Seniors, Expert Warns

Staff ReporterElection, Health 0

Extreme heat poses significant health risks for seniors, potentially accelerating biological aging and leading to severe complications, according to gerontologist Dr. Macie Smith.

The summer heat can be challenging for anyone, but it presents heightened risks for seniors. Recent research published in the journal *Science Advances* indicates that extreme heat may accelerate “biological aging” in older adults, raising concerns about its long-term health implications.

Dr. Macie P. Smith, a licensed social worker and gerontologist based in South Carolina, discussed the relationship between heat and aging in an interview with Fox News Digital. She emphasized that seniors are particularly vulnerable to dehydration, which, when combined with extreme heat, can create a “recipe for disaster,” leading to serious health issues such as heatstroke.

“Dehydration is one of the most common reasons our seniors are hospitalized,” Smith noted. Many seniors may not drink enough water, often due to a desire to avoid frequent urination. Additionally, the natural sense of thirst tends to diminish with age.

“Just because they’re not thirsty doesn’t mean they don’t need to hydrate themselves,” Smith said. “They still need to be well-hydrated, especially during extreme heat.” Certain medications commonly prescribed to seniors, such as diuretics, can exacerbate dehydration.

Dehydration can also lead to urinary tract infections (UTIs), which can severely affect seniors, sometimes mimicking symptoms of late-stage dementia or Alzheimer’s disease. Smith highlighted that signs of dehydration include dry mouth, an inability to produce tears, and clammy skin.

“From sun-up to sundown, you want to be sure that you are drinking and eating foods that will keep you well-hydrated and not put yourself at risk of hospitalization,” she advised.

As seniors age, they typically experience reduced body and muscle mass, thinner skin, and a diminished ability to regulate body temperature. The effects of extreme heat can strain the body physically, cognitively, and emotionally. “Stress ages people prematurely,” Smith remarked, noting that the impact of heat extends to brain function as well.

Despite these challenges, many seniors remain active, which is to be encouraged. However, Smith stressed the importance of timing activities to avoid the hottest parts of the day. “We want to be sure that seniors are doing the bulk of their activities during the morning hours before the extreme heat hits, which could be as early as 11 a.m.,” she said. This advice is particularly relevant for seniors living in warmer regions of the U.S., such as Florida or Las Vegas.

Smith also recommended that seniors check the forecast before going to bed to prepare for the next day’s temperatures. “Test your cooling system regularly to make sure it works,” she advised, noting that there are grant programs available to help seniors maintain proper cooling systems in their homes.

For caregivers and family members of seniors, Smith suggested regularly checking in to ensure that loved ones are living in a comfortable environment and staying properly hydrated. “You want to find creative ways to be respectful and to ensure their independence while also helping them maintain a healthy lifestyle,” she said. “This all helps them to age well and not prematurely.”

As extreme heat continues to pose risks, awareness and proactive measures are essential for safeguarding the health of seniors during the summer months.

Source: Original article

No Safe Haven for Children in Gaza Amid Ongoing Conflict

Staff ReporterConflict, Politics, Travel 0

UNICEF warns that nowhere in Gaza is safe for children as the humanitarian crisis deepens amid ongoing conflict, with millions facing starvation and malnutrition.

UNICEF has issued a stark warning that nowhere in Gaza is safe for children, highlighting the dire situation amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine. A recent report indicates that over 60,000 people have died in Gaza since the conflict escalated, including 18,592 children and 9,782 women. The humanitarian crisis has reached alarming levels, with 90 percent of the population displaced due to the longest blockade in the region’s history.

International humanitarian organizations have raised concerns that Israel’s siege and blockades have pushed approximately 2 million people in Gaza to the brink of famine. During a briefing hosted by American Community Media on August 8, experts called for urgent international intervention to prevent catastrophic levels of hunger and starvation, emphasizing the moral imperative to provide aid to Gaza’s children.

The panel featured prominent voices, including Alex de Waal, Executive Director of the World Peace Foundation at Tufts University; Budour Hassan, a researcher with Amnesty International focusing on Israel and Palestine; and Afeef Nessouli, a journalist and aid worker who recently volunteered in Gaza.

The roots of Gaza’s crisis can be traced back to the military blockades imposed by Israel following the October 7 attack on civilians by Hamas in 2023. Prior to this escalation, Dr. de Waal noted that the population’s nutrition and health status were relatively stable, with high vaccination rates and health coverage. However, the blockade has left Gazans entirely dependent on supplies of food, medicine, water, and fuel controlled by Israel.

The military campaign that ensued in October 2023 resulted in the destruction of essential infrastructure, leading to mass displacement and the breakdown of Gaza’s social fabric. According to de Waal, international law defines indispensable objects for survival as including food, water, sanitation, housing, and medical care. The air and land assaults have forced many to evacuate their homes, leading to overcrowded shelters.

Data from the World Food Program reveals that more than 500,000 people, nearly a quarter of Gaza’s population, are experiencing famine-like conditions. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a UN early warning system, indicates that two out of three famine thresholds have been breached in parts of the territory.

De Waal explained that the IPC draws on various data types, including food security, child malnutrition, and evidence of excess deaths. The situation has deteriorated significantly, with the population nearing famine levels by late 2024. He also noted that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s aid sites have become dangerous, leading to fatalities among those seeking food. The Israeli military has attributed food shortages to theft by Hamas and armed groups, leaving vulnerable Gazans without adequate supplies.

Afeef Nessouli, who spent nine weeks volunteering in Gaza, described the humanitarian aid sites as disorganized “deathtraps” that have replaced community kitchens that once provided hot meals. He recounted visiting a community kitchen that had shut down, leaving only potatoes for sustenance. Nessouli criticized the aid strategy as ineffective, stating it has caused more suffering than relief.

As Israel continues to restrict humanitarian aid, Gazans face severe shortages of food and medical supplies. De Waal warned that the poorest segments of the population are at the greatest risk, particularly as the number of starving children rises daily. The situation is exacerbated by the ongoing blockade, which has persisted long before the recent conflict.

Amnesty International’s Hassan reported that the humanitarian crisis in Gaza has been decades in the making, with severe restrictions on food and medical supplies leading to widespread starvation. A December 2024 report from Amnesty described Israel’s actions as genocidal, citing the deliberate destruction of living conditions and the infliction of physical and mental harm on Palestinians.

Hassan highlighted the “flour massacres,” where desperate crowds surged to receive limited food supplies, resulting in chaos and fatalities. The blockade has not only restricted food access but has also devastated Gaza’s social fabric, with traditional community support systems breaking down under the pressure of survival.

As the conflict escalated in March 2024, hospitals became overcrowded with casualties, and reports of starvation among infants emerged. Families were forced to abandon their homes, leaving behind sources of food and medical supplies. The situation has led to a sense of dehumanization among the population, with many feeling that their humanity is overlooked by the world.

UNICEF has called for increased humanitarian and commercial traffic into Gaza to combat the rising death toll from starvation and conflict. Cindy McCain, Executive Director of the World Food Programme, emphasized the urgent need for large-scale food aid to prevent mass starvation.

De Waal, while condemning Hamas’ actions, questioned why the civilian population of Gaza should bear the consequences. He urged for transparency and access for journalists to report on the humanitarian crisis, asserting that the United Nations has the capacity to provide aid that is currently being obstructed.

The people of Gaza are facing unprecedented challenges, with a breakdown of social cohesion and a lack of essential resources. De Waal underscored the importance of recognizing the humanity of those affected, stating that the true measure of a society is how it treats its most vulnerable members.

As the humanitarian crisis deepens, the plight of Gaza’s children remains a pressing concern, with UNICEF reporting that over 320,000 children are at risk of acute malnutrition. The international community must act swiftly to address the urgent needs of the population and prevent further suffering.

Source: Original article

-+=