Author: Staff Reporter

Pope Francis Appoints Sister Raffaella Petrini as President of Vatican City Governorate

Staff ReporterWomen 0

On February 15, Pope Francis appointed Sister Raffaella Petrini as the new president of the Pontifical Commission for Vatican City State and the President of the Governorate of Vatican City State.

According to a statement from the Holy See Press Office, the appointment will take effect on March 1.

Sister Petrini, a member of the Franciscan Sisters of the Eucharist, has held the position of secretary general of the Governorate since 2021. With this new role, she becomes the first woman to assume the highest leadership position in the Vatican’s administrative framework.

As president, she will be responsible for overseeing Vatican City’s governance, managing daily operations, and implementing policies in alignment with the Holy See’s directives. The governorate is tasked with handling various administrative functions, including security, infrastructure, and the preservation of cultural heritage.

Sister Petrini succeeds Cardinal Fernando Vérgez Alzaga, L.C., who had served as president since 2021.

New Cancer Drug Trial Achieves Unprecedented Complete Remission in Patients

Staff ReporterHealth 0

A groundbreaking development at Manhattan’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has stunned the medical world. A new drug trial has delivered results that experts are calling a medical marvel—complete remission of cancer in every participant. This small but unprecedented study has sparked global optimism and intense curiosity as dostarlimab, the drug being tested, demonstrates the potential to revolutionize cancer treatment. The implications of this breakthrough raise important questions about the future of oncology and what it means for patients battling this devastating disease.

The trial conducted at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has drawn significant attention due to its extraordinary success. It focused on dostarlimab, a novel checkpoint inhibitor, and was limited to a select group of rectal cancer patients. Every single participant in the trial experienced complete remission, an extremely rare outcome in oncology.

Though the study was small, with only 12 participants, it was meticulously designed. The patients selected had locally advanced rectal cancer and were chosen based on specific criteria that indicated they might respond to the treatment. Each participant received dostarlimab every three weeks over a six-month period. The trial aimed to determine the drug’s effectiveness in exposing cancer cells to the immune system, allowing the body to recognize and destroy them.

To evaluate the drug’s efficacy, researchers used a combination of physical examinations, endoscopies, positron emission tomography (PET) scans, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The results, which revealed complete disappearance of tumors in all patients, shocked and thrilled the medical team and the broader oncology community.

Before joining the trial, many of the patients had endured extensive and exhausting treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation. These interventions not only failed to eliminate their cancer but also led to severe side effects, leaving patients physically and emotionally drained. Dr. Andrea Cercek, an oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering and co-author of the study, noted, “The patients had almost given up hopes after failing to recover after going through grueling chemotherapy and radiation sessions.” Some were even facing the possibility of life-altering surgeries that could have resulted in permanent changes to their bodily functions.

However, the introduction of dostarlimab marked a turning point. Patients were astonished to learn that their tumors had vanished, and no further invasive treatments were needed. Dr. Cercek described the emotional moment, saying there were “a lot of happy tears.” The impact of this revelation was immense, not just in terms of physical relief but also in the profound shift it brought to the patients’ mental and emotional well-being.

Participants in the study were closely monitored for signs of recurrence through regular follow-ups involving advanced imaging. Remarkably, there was no evidence of cancer returning up to 25 months after the trial concluded. This sustained remission provided a significant sense of relief and fostered a cautiously optimistic outlook. One patient, reflecting on their experience, expressed immense gratitude: “Not expecting their cancerous tumors to subside, they agreed to be part of the dostarlimab trial. But to their pleasant surprise, they were taken off the painful chemotherapy and radiation sessions and also told that there would be no need to go under the knife.”

Dostarlimab represents a major advancement in oncology, particularly within immunotherapy. As a checkpoint inhibitor, it targets the immune system’s ability to recognize and destroy cancer cells, a process often blocked by the cancer cells themselves. Normally, cancer cells evade detection by manipulating certain proteins that act as checkpoints in the immune system. These checkpoints prevent the immune system from mistakenly attacking the body’s own cells. However, dostarlimab blocks these checkpoint proteins, removing the protective shield that cancer cells use to evade immune attack. This allows T-cells, the body’s natural defense mechanism, to recognize and destroy cancerous cells.

Checkpoint inhibitors like dostarlimab belong to a broader class of drugs that have revolutionized cancer treatment in recent years. These drugs are particularly effective against cancers with a high mutation burden, making them more recognizable to the immune system once the checkpoints are inhibited. Dostarlimab specifically targets the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, which plays a crucial role in enabling tumors to evade immune responses.

In this trial, dostarlimab was administered every three weeks for six months. The results were extraordinary, and unlike conventional cancer treatments such as chemotherapy, which often come with severe side effects, this drug showed a remarkable safety profile. “Such drugs, known as ‘checkpoint inhibitors,’ usually have some kind of adverse reaction in 20% of patients who undergo the treatments. Nearly 60% of patients have severe complications, including muscle weakness. But no negative reaction was seen in the patients involved in the dostarlimab study,” stated the report.

This combination of effectiveness and minimal side effects suggests that dostarlimab could be a game-changer, not just for rectal cancer but for other cancers that share similar biological markers. Traditionally, cancer treatments have relied on surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. While these methods are effective, they often result in significant physical and emotional burdens for patients. The success of dostarlimab suggests a potential shift toward less invasive treatment options, reducing the need for aggressive therapies such as surgery and chemotherapy, particularly in cancers that are responsive to immunotherapy.

The trial also highlights the growing importance of personalized medicine in cancer treatment. By targeting specific genetic markers, drugs like dostarlimab can be tailored to individual patients, increasing efficacy while minimizing unwanted side effects. As genetic testing and biomarker research continue to advance, personalized immunotherapies could become more widespread.

The remarkable results of this study are expected to drive further research into checkpoint inhibitors and other immunotherapy treatments. Given the unprecedented success seen in this trial, additional studies will likely explore dostarlimab’s application to a wider range of cancers and at different stages. If these findings hold true in larger trials, the drug could significantly broaden treatment options for patients who currently lack effective therapies.

Beyond the scientific community, the implications of this breakthrough extend to healthcare policy and economics. If treatments like dostarlimab can provide long-term remission with fewer resources and less patient trauma, they could help reduce the financial and logistical burdens associated with traditional cancer therapies. However, the high cost of such drugs remains a significant barrier. At its current trial phase, dostarlimab costs approximately $11,000 per dose, posing a substantial challenge for widespread use, particularly in lower-income countries and even among middle-class patients in developed nations.

For dostarlimab to become widely accessible, insurance companies and healthcare systems will need to reassess their policies regarding coverage for innovative cancer treatments. Adjustments in public health funding and insurance structures may be necessary to ensure that patients who need these therapies can afford them. Additionally, pharmaceutical companies must collaborate with governments and global health organizations to scale up manufacturing and distribution, ensuring that dostarlimab reaches patients worldwide.

The ethical implications of access to life-saving drugs like dostarlimab cannot be ignored. Healthcare equity remains a crucial issue, as life-changing treatments should not be limited to those who can afford them. Addressing these concerns will require careful planning and collaboration among medical professionals, policymakers, and industry leaders.

The success of the dostarlimab trial represents more than just a medical breakthrough; it signals a potential transformation in cancer care. The results demonstrate that modern science is advancing toward treatments that are not only more effective but also less invasive and more humane. However, ensuring that these therapies are accessible to all patients will require collective efforts from governments, pharmaceutical companies, and the healthcare sector.

Moving forward, continued research and larger clinical trials will be essential to validate and expand upon these findings. Additionally, healthcare systems must adapt to incorporate these new treatments while ensuring that all patients, regardless of economic or geographic barriers, have access to them.

Dostarlimab offers a beacon of hope—not just for those currently battling cancer, but for future generations. With persistent dedication and collaboration across various fields, the possibility of turning cancer into a manageable condition rather than a terminal diagnosis is within reach.

Inside Etihad’s Luxurious A380 Residence: Chennai Influencer Couple’s Exclusive Experience

Staff ReporterTravel 0

A three-room suite with a television, separate bathrooms, and premium amenities is a standard feature in five-star hotels. But what if these luxurious facilities were available on a flight? That is precisely what Etihad Airways offers with “The Residence” on its A380 aircraft.

Recently, a Chennai-based social media influencer couple took their followers on a virtual tour of this extravagant flying experience, sharing their insights on Instagram.

The couple, Keerthi and Aashish Manivannan, who have over 114,000 Instagram followers, posted about their journey in a post titled “Beyond First Class? The Residence on Etihad’s A380.” Their travel itinerary included a flight from Paris to Hyderabad, with a layover in Abu Dhabi. The post also highlighted that Etihad’s A380 operates between Paris and Abu Dhabi.

“We flew from Paris – Abu Dhabi – Hyderabad, and the A380 flies between Paris and Abu Dhabi,” they mentioned in their Instagram post.

The Etihad Residence Experience

For travelers flying in business class, first class, or premium suites, the luxury experience often begins long before they board the flight. The couple’s journey was no exception, as they received an exclusive welcome at the First Class Lounge at Abu Dhabi International Airport.

According to their post, the lounge offered gourmet à la carte meals, a dedicated play area for children, shower suites, private cabins for families, and sleeping pods.

Once on board, the couple described their experience as the closest they have ever been to flying on a private jet.

A Three-Room Flying Suite

The highlight of their journey was the “3-room cabin” that they had all to themselves, located near the nose of the aircraft. The spacious lounge area featured two large sofa seats and a big-screen television. Adjacent to this was a dedicated shower area and a restroom. Further inside the suite was a full-size bed, complete with “pillows, duvets, and bedding.”

Among the many premium services available, the couple noted the convenience of “The cabin crew makes the bed for you.”

Other exclusive features, such as anytime gourmet dining, inflight WiFi, and the sheer space and privacy offered by “The Residence,” add to the appeal of this ultra-luxurious experience. Currently, Etihad operates just one such suite on each of its A380 aircraft.

Exclusive Washroom Amenities

The suite’s private washroom was another standout feature, equipped with a Giorgio Armani amenity kit containing creams, eye masks, socks, and other essential toiletries. Additionally, sleepwear from the same designer brand was provided, along with “lots of gourmet chocolates.”

Fine Liquor Selection Onboard

For those who enjoy premium drinks, the couple noted the availability of an extensive selection of expensive wines, champagnes, and other premium liquors, making the experience comparable to that of flying on a private jet.

“The experience was amazing, almost like flying a private jet, and we had the best time,” said the couple, emphasizing that their review was not an advertisement or a brand collaboration.

Netizens React

The couple’s Instagram post quickly gained traction, with many social media users admiring their luxurious experience and appreciating the joy they shared as a family.

“The real wealth is her family; they are so happy together and complete,” commented a user named Aggan.

Another user, Rajesh Kumar, praised the suite’s spaciousness, noting that “It actually looks better than most private jets; the amount of space is insane.”

The couple’s journey offered their followers a glimpse into one of the most opulent travel experiences available today, highlighting the exclusivity of Etihad Airways’ A380 Residence.

Modi Returns from U.S. Meeting with Unmet Trade Demands and Tariff Concerns

Staff ReporterIndia 0

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had been banking on a series of concessions before his meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump to maintain favorable ties with Washington, especially after weeks of tariff threats.

However, these efforts fell short.

As Modi heads back to New Delhi, he faces the looming prospect of increased duties on Indian exports and heightened pressure to purchase more American products—ranging from energy to advanced U.S. weapons systems. The meeting highlighted that the warm rapport the two leaders shared during Trump’s first term has its limits.

The discussions marked the first official meeting between Modi and Trump since 2020 and underscored Trump’s determination to revamp trade relationships with all nations, including close U.S. allies. Hours before their meeting, Trump announced that the U.S. would begin imposing “reciprocal” tariffs. He also openly criticized India’s trade policies while standing alongside Modi at a press conference.

“India has been to us just about the highest-tariffed nation in the world,” Trump said at the White House, with Modi standing beside him. “Whatever India charges, we’re charging them.”

Indian officials familiar with the meeting emphasized that it was not entirely negative. While India is waiting for details on the reciprocal tariffs, officials noted that an agreement to pursue a bilateral trade pact provides a platform for negotiation. They spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the discussions.

Modi was one of the earliest foreign leaders to visit Trump, joining the ranks of the prime ministers of Japan and Israel. The visit followed years of strengthening ties between India and the U.S., as Washington has strategically engaged India as a counterbalance to China’s growing influence in the region.

Several U.S. corporations, including Apple Inc. and Starbucks Corp., have significantly expanded their operations in India, tapping into the country’s growing consumer market while seeking to diversify away from Chinese supply chains.

Even during Trump’s first term, when he and Modi had a friendly rapport, India’s tariff policies remained a recurring point of contention. Now, with Trump’s second term underway, Modi has taken a more flexible stance, reducing import tariffs on various goods, including Harley-Davidson Inc. motorcycles.

Further demonstrating its willingness to accommodate U.S. demands, New Delhi announced on Thursday a reduction in taxes on American bourbon, cutting the rate from 150% to 100%—a key demand from Washington.

A senior U.S. official, speaking to Bloomberg News anonymously, described these steps as minor but welcomed. However, it was evident that Modi left Washington with a list of further actions to take, as Trump underscored his intent to reduce the U.S.’s $41 billion trade deficit with India.

“We believe that India still remains in Trump’s line of fire on reciprocal tariffs, even as the two countries have reiterated their strategic partnership,” said Sonal Varma, chief economist for India at Nomura Singapore Ltd.

India’s Ministry of External Affairs and Finance Ministry did not immediately respond to requests for further clarification.

Increased U.S. Defense Sales on the Horizon

Among India’s most notable commitments was its pledge to increase purchases of American energy and military equipment. India currently relies primarily on Russia for its defense needs and energy supplies, but Washington has long sought to reduce Moscow’s influence in these sectors.

In response, Trump announced that the U.S. would offer India the opportunity to purchase Lockheed Martin Corp.’s F-35 fighter jets, further strengthening defense cooperation between the two countries. However, any such deal faces hurdles due to the jet’s exorbitant cost and concerns about technology security, given India’s deep defense ties with Russia.

“The timeframe for the F-35 sale remains unclear, but it’s clearly something Trump will push hard given the revenue that the U.S. can draw from selling such an expensive system,” said Michael Kugelman, director at the South Asia Institute of the Wilson Center.

Despite these defense discussions, Modi did not secure any definitive commitment from Trump regarding the continuation of the H-1B visa program, which facilitates legal immigration for high-skilled Indian workers to the U.S. This program is a key concern for India’s technology sector. However, Modi did express openness to repatriating undocumented Indian migrants from the U.S., a stance that has drawn political criticism back home.

One topic that was notably absent from the discussions was the ongoing legal troubles of Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, who has been indicted in the U.S. for allegedly paying hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes to Indian government officials. Adani, a close ally of Modi, has denied the allegations.

“Personal Matters” Off the Table

“When it comes to such personal matters, two leaders of two countries will not get together on the topic and discuss anything on an individual matter,” Modi stated during the press conference.

Despite their disagreements, Modi and Trump concluded their meeting on a positive note by setting ambitious goals for future cooperation. Both leaders committed to expanding bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030, a significant increase from $126.6 billion in 2023. Additionally, they reaffirmed their commitment to deepening defense and technological collaboration.

However, the discrepancy between India’s tariffs on U.S. imports and America’s relatively lower duties remains a critical sticking point. This imbalance puts India in a weaker negotiating position when discussing a comprehensive trade deal with the U.S., according to Shumita Deveshwar, chief India economist at GlobalData.TS Lombard.

“There are more concessions to be made because, for us, the U.S. is a far bigger market than India is for the U.S.,” she noted. “We do come from a position of disadvantage into these talks.”

As Modi returns to India, his government must now navigate the next steps in trade negotiations, balancing Washington’s demands while safeguarding India’s economic interests.

Munich Security Conference Highlights Growing NATO Divisions Amid Ukraine Crisis

Staff ReporterWorld 0

U.S. Vice President JD Vance, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky, and nearly 60 world leaders and policymakers are set to gather in Munich for the annual Munich Security Conference (MSC) over the next three days.

For nearly two decades, this event has been a focal point for global security discussions, but this year, the stakes appear higher than ever. A senior Western official described the current global security climate as “the most dangerous and contested time” of their career.

Cracks in the International Order

The established global security structure, often referred to as the International Rules-based Order, is facing unprecedented strain. Some argue it is already beginning to collapse.

When Russian President Vladimir Putin launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago, much of the world condemned the move. NATO, the European Union, and Western nations demonstrated remarkable unity in supporting Ukraine, ensuring it could defend itself without direct Western military intervention.

While Hungary and Slovakia occasionally expressed reservations, there was broad consensus that Putin’s invasion needed to fail to prevent Russia from further aggression, possibly against NATO members like Estonia. The prevailing belief was that Ukraine should receive whatever it needed to achieve a strong negotiating position for lasting peace.

U.S. Shifts Policy on Ukraine

However, that unity has begun to fray. Former President Donald Trump has significantly undermined Ukraine’s stance by declaring—through his Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth—that restoring Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is “not realistic.” Additionally, the U.S. has dismissed Kyiv’s aspirations for NATO membership, a key goal for President Zelensky, and ruled out sending troops to defend Ukraine from potential future Russian invasions.

Further rattling Western allies, Trump recently held a cordial 90-minute phone call with Putin, abruptly ending a three-year diplomatic freeze. This shift in U.S. policy suggests a preference for quickly ending the war, even if it means meeting many of Moscow’s demands.

Over the coming days in Munich, Trump’s team is expected to outline their plans for Ukraine, with retired U.S. Army General Keith Kellogg traveling to Kyiv next week for further discussions. However, a clear rift has emerged between Washington and Europe. While the U.S. prioritizes ending the war swiftly, European leaders had, until recently, believed that sustained pressure on Moscow—amid significant Russian battlefield casualties and economic struggles—could secure a more favorable peace for Ukraine.

NATO’s Growing Divisions

Beyond Ukraine, other cracks are emerging within NATO. Trump’s recent announcement of his interest in “buying” Greenland—an autonomous territory of Denmark—has sparked fresh tensions. When Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen firmly stated that “Greenland is not for sale,” Trump reportedly reacted with a “horrendous” phone call and did not rule out using force to take the territory.

The notion of a NATO country threatening to seize another member’s land was once unthinkable. In Greenland’s case, U.S. security interests are already well-served, as the island hosts more American troops than Danish forces, and Copenhagen has been open to strengthening mutual defense arrangements.

While many in Scandinavia hope Trump’s proposal is mere rhetoric, the broader damage is already done. His remarks signal a troubling precedent—that using force against neighbors for territorial gain is acceptable.

Former UK National Security Adviser and Ambassador to Washington, Lord Kim Darroch, warned that Trump’s threats against Denmark—whether economic or military—send a dangerous message. “Even if nothing comes from it, it’s done great damage. It’s another signal of Trump’s disdain for NATO. And it will be interpreted in Moscow and Beijing as a message that they have a free hand in Ukraine and Taiwan respectively,” he said.

At the Munich Security Conference, European allies will seek reassurance from Washington that NATO remains strong. However, Trump appears determined to reshape America’s global role and seems unlikely to heed European concerns.

Americans See Federal Overspending but Want More Funding for Social Security and Key Programs

Staff ReporterUSA 0

Many Americans believe the federal government is overspending, yet polling suggests that a significant number, including Republicans, think funding for major programs like Social Security is insufficient.

Surveys from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research indicate that as former President Donald Trump and adviser Elon Musk advocate for sweeping budget cuts—including reductions in humanitarian aid and potential cuts to the Department of Education and the military—many Americans may not support their approach to trimming federal expenditures.

A January AP-NORC poll found that about two-thirds of Americans believe the government is spending too little on Social Security and education. Additionally, roughly six in ten think more funding should go toward assistance for the poor, and a similar percentage say that Medicare—the health insurance program for seniors—is underfunded. Many also believe Medicaid lacks adequate financial support. Meanwhile, about half of respondents feel that border security is not receiving enough funding.

This presents an ongoing dilemma for lawmakers: while most Americans believe the government isn’t allocating enough money to key programs, they also broadly support budget cuts. A March 2023 AP-NORC poll revealed that six in ten U.S. adults thought the government was spending too much overall.

Foreign Aid Seen as a Primary Area of Overspending

One area where Americans largely agree on overspending is foreign aid. The 2023 AP-NORC poll showed that a majority of Americans believe too much money is directed to other countries.

Approximately seven in ten U.S. adults said the government allocated excessive funds to “assistance to other countries.” This sentiment was particularly strong among Republicans—nearly nine in ten thought foreign aid was overfunded, compared to just over half of Democrats.

Richard Tunnell, a 33-year-old veteran from Huntsville, Texas, believes the U.S. intervenes too frequently in international affairs. An independent voter who supported Trump in the last election, Tunnell appreciates Trump’s “America First” agenda.

“Americans need to worry about Americans,” Tunnell said. “There’s atrocities happening on American soil just as much as there is on foreign soil. You know, if we can’t clean up our own house, why the hell are we trying to clean up somebody else’s house?”

However, surveys suggest that many Americans overestimate how much of the federal budget is spent on foreign aid. Research from KFF found that, on average, Americans believe foreign aid accounts for 31% of the budget, when in reality, it is closer to 1% or less.

Bipartisan Agreement on Social Security and Medicare

Few Americans, regardless of political affiliation, think the country spends too much on Social Security or Medicare. However, opinions diverge when it comes to military spending, border security, Medicaid, and assistance programs for low-income individuals.

About one-third of U.S. adults believe the military receives excessive funding, while another third think the budget is about right. The remaining third feel the military is underfunded. A partisan divide is evident: most Republicans argue that military funding is too low, while nearly half of Democrats say it receives too much money.

Jeremy Shouse, a 38-year-old Democrat from Durham, North Carolina, believes social programs should receive as much funding as the military.

“I think it’s really a slap in our faces as Americans,” Shouse said, expressing frustration over the lack of funding for programs like Medicaid, which he has personally relied on.

“When it comes down to school, Medicaid, any type of government assistance programs, the money is just kind of not there,” he added. “Not like it is for the military or the Army.”

A strong majority of Democrats believe too little is spent on assistance for the poor, education, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. When it comes to border security, Democrats are more divided—about four in ten feel the funding is appropriate, while the remaining respondents are evenly split between those who believe it’s too high and those who think it’s too low. Regarding federal law enforcement agencies such as the CIA and FBI, most Democrats feel funding levels are about right.

Republicans, on the other hand, tend to support increased funding for border security, Social Security, and the military. About eight in ten Republicans believe the government allocates too little to border security, while roughly two-thirds say Social Security needs more funding.

Despite these divisions, the overall data suggests a paradox: while Americans frequently argue that the federal government overspends, many simultaneously believe that crucial domestic programs remain underfunded.

The Crisis of Hindi Cinema and the Media’s Role in Its Decline

Staff ReporterCulture 0

Hindi cinema has been struggling for quite some time now, facing a downturn that is hard to ignore. Quality films often fail to get the recognition they deserve, while subpar productions occasionally succeed but mostly flounder. This has led to what can be described as an existential crisis for Bollywood—India’s second-greatest obsession after cricket.

Several factors have contributed to this crisis, but beyond the excessive greed of multiplex owners, which has alienated core audiences, and the shifting perspectives of moviegoers, another key culprit is the media. Rather than serving as a stabilizing force or at least offering some support, the media has been largely irresponsible, immature, and, at times, even malicious. From social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube to print and online publications, the role played by the press in shaping public perception of Hindi cinema has been overwhelmingly negative.

The Decline in the Quality of Film Journalism

A significant issue with modern film journalism is the lack of deep understanding among those covering the industry. Many of today’s journalists are young and lack substantial knowledge or independent analysis of how Hindi cinema evolved into what it is today. Rather than developing informed perspectives, they often rely on one another, so-called “experts,” or personal biases shaped by their admiration for specific filmmakers, stars, or genres. Very few have a genuine passion for cinema or approach their critiques with objectivity.

Many of these individuals aspire to be filmmakers or screenwriters themselves, which often makes them critical of mainstream Bollywood storytelling. They scoff at elements that have been part of Hindi cinema’s DNA for over eight decades simply because these tropes do not align with the aesthetics of world cinema, particularly its critically acclaimed segments.

There is also a faction of critics who blindly idolize South Indian cinema, which, in itself, is not problematic. However, their excessive praise of regional films often comes at the expense of Hindi movies, leading to unnecessary comparisons and an unfair dismissal of Bollywood’s contributions.

Focusing on Non-Issues

Another distraction in the discourse surrounding Hindi cinema is the undue attention given to so-called “nepotism” and “nepo-kids.” While these terms have lost their significance in Bollywood, they still dominate discussions—despite nepotism thriving even more prominently in South Indian film industries. Critics paradoxically celebrate South cinema as being “grounded” while dismissing Hindi films that tell similar stories as being disconnected from reality.

Moreover, Hindi cinema’s biggest stars, both seasoned and emerging, are frequently criticized for their supposed lack of talent. The line between personal and professional criticism is blurred, leading to unwarranted attacks on actors.

Ignorance and the Abuse of Influence

The biases of film journalists extend to their preferences for certain filmmakers and actors, often disregarding public sentiment. Directors like Anurag Kashyap, Hansal Mehta, and Vishal Bhardwaj, to name a few, receive disproportionate praise, while many truly talented artists go unnoticed. The industry’s fixation on international recognition further exacerbates this trend—global accolades take precedence over domestic achievements, even when Indian audiences fail to connect with these celebrated filmmakers.

There is a growing pattern of outright dismissal of Hindi cinema. While film reviews were once secondary to audience decisions, today, they have an outsized influence. With ticket prices at an all-time high, moviegoers increasingly rely on reviews to decide whether a film is worth watching. Unfortunately, many critics appear more interested in tearing down Bollywood than offering constructive feedback.

Another problem lies in the inconsistent reporting of box office figures. While some journalists inflate earnings to make a film appear more successful than it is, others take a contrarian approach, prematurely labeling movies as flops. Often, films are declared failures even before their release, and post-launch, every effort is made to justify these predetermined verdicts. This creates confusion among audiences, leaving them unsure about a movie’s actual performance.

Of course, box office numbers should not be the sole measure of a film’s worth. A good film does not lose its artistic merit simply because it underperforms commercially. However, exaggerated earnings reports contribute to the growing distrust in media, reinforcing the perception that journalism is tainted by bias and monetary incentives.

The term “paid media” has become increasingly relevant, as even honest journalists are painted with the same brush as those who distort facts for personal gain. Conversely, individuals who peddle negativity under the guise of “telling it like it is” are lauded as voices of integrity.

One senior critic in the industry, who once enjoyed great reverence, was notorious for his inconsistent opinions. He would harshly critique a film, then later praise one aspect of it while condemning the director’s next project. In another instance, he would criticize one movie but later use it as a benchmark to deride another film from the same filmmaker. Audiences began to notice these contradictions, exposing his lack of credibility.

Yet, that was an era when such behavior was still limited. Today, the dominant trend among critics is outright hostility. The tools of their trade—keyboards, microphones, and cameras—are wielded not as instruments of fair critique but as weapons of destruction.

The Rise of Agenda-Driven Journalism

A troubling development in recent years is the increasing number of journalists launching their own platforms, using them to fabricate, amplify, and sustain controversies. They manipulate narratives, cite unverifiable “sources,” and enlist supposed “authorities” to lend credence to their claims. Their primary motivation is not truth but digital engagement—views, likes, and revenue. The impact of their misinformation is growing, influencing public perception in dangerous ways.

One recent example involves a passionate cinephile named Vikram, who happens to be related to a legendary film personality. Vikram had long been influenced by a biased film columnist, often adopting the same views without independent thought. However, when he engaged with me in a private conversation regarding a particular film, I suggested he watch it himself rather than rely on second-hand opinions. Filmmaking, after all, is an arduous process, and while the results may vary from awful to brilliant, every film deserves a fair assessment. To his credit, Vikram acknowledged the validity of my argument.

Unfortunately, not everyone is as willing to challenge their preconceptions. Many simply accept media narratives without question, which is why responsible, honest journalism is more crucial than ever.

What the Media Should Be

A true champion of Hindi cinema should not impose conditions on their appreciation of the industry. Just as a parent or teacher supports a child through challenges, journalists should stand by Bollywood during its rough patches. Constructive criticism is vital, but it should be offered with the intent to improve, not to destroy.

The absence of such support has left a void. Instead of acting as a guiding force, today’s media is complicit in Bollywood’s struggles. If Hindi cinema is to regain its strength, it needs a press that values integrity over sensationalism, fairness over favoritism, and encouragement over perpetual condemnation.

Ultimately, Bollywood’s fate does not rest solely in the hands of filmmakers, actors, or audiences. The media wields significant influence in shaping narratives, and if it continues on its current path, it may contribute to the very downfall it claims to lament.

Grassley Criticizes Trump’s Watchdog Firings, Says Law Was Violated

Staff ReporterUSA 0

President Donald Trump’s recent dismissals of key federal watchdogs responsible for overseeing government accountability violated the law, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said Wednesday.

On Tuesday, Trump fired the inspector general of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) following a damning report from the office detailing the administration’s efforts to dismantle the agency, which put nearly $500 million worth of food aid at risk of spoiling. This move comes after Trump removed 18 inspectors general from other federal agencies last month.

Federal law requires the administration to notify Congress 30 days in advance and provide specific reasons before terminating an inspector general. The Trump administration failed to meet this requirement.

Grassley, a longtime advocate for inspectors general and their oversight role established after President Richard Nixon’s Watergate scandal, indicated that he supported the dismissal of USAID Inspector General Paul Martin, stating that Martin “wasn’t doing his job.” However, he criticized the president for bypassing legal protocols.

“I’d like to alert the president to the fact that he can abide by the law and still get rid of the people he wants to get rid of,” Grassley said. “He can put them on administrative leave for 30 days and send us a letter.”

When asked if he intended to inform Trump directly, Grassley responded, “I just did, by talking to you.”

Grassley previously sent a letter to Trump seeking clarification on the earlier inspector general firings but has yet to receive a response. Despite this, the senator was recently seen dining with the president at his Florida estate, sharing a photo online.

A report from the USAID Office of Inspector General on Monday highlighted how the administration’s decision to freeze nearly all USAID operations and halt foreign assistance led to significant confusion and delays in aid distribution.

“While initial guidance following the pause in foreign assistance funding provided a waiver for emergency food assistance, shipments of in-kind food assistance have been delayed around the world,” the report stated.

“This uncertainty put more than $489 million of food assistance at ports, in transit, and in warehouses at risk of spoilage, unanticipated storage needs, and diversion,” it continued.

Many Republicans have backed Trump’s push to downsize USAID, despite previously supporting the agency’s role in countering China and Russia’s influence in Africa and other regions.

“USAID is an agency that let us all down,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Tuesday, criticizing the agency’s spending practices.

However, in 2021, Graham called USAID “a force for good.” Other Republicans, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Ivanka Trump, have also praised the agency in the past.

Last week, a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reinstate some USAID employees while the courts assess the legality of the agency’s closure. Despite this ruling, the administration has continued to restrict workers from entering the Washington headquarters, indicating that portions of the office space may be repurposed for U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials.

Indian-Americans, H-1B Visas, and the Struggle for Fair Recognition

Staff ReporterTechnology 0

The H-1B visa program, designed to help U.S. businesses access specialized foreign professionals, has become a battleground for political and cultural disputes. Prominent figures like former President Donald Trump and entrepreneur Elon Musk champion the program, emphasizing its role in sustaining American innovation and global competitiveness. However, staunch MAGA conservatives such as Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller strongly oppose it, arguing that it displaces American workers and lowers wages. This division within the MAGA movement has intensified the controversy, placing Indian professionals—the largest group of H-1B recipients—at the center of a heated national debate, inadvertently casting a shadow over the broader Indian-American community.

For Indian-Americans like myself, especially those active on social media, the hostility directed at H-1B visa holders has become deeply personal and often toxic. My social media feed on X is inundated with inflammatory rhetoric, misleading information, and outright racist commentary. The criticism extends beyond immigration and employment issues, touching even my religion—Hinduism—which is frequently distorted, ridiculed, or misrepresented. What initially began as a policy discussion has morphed into an aggressive campaign against Indian professionals and their cultural identity.

These narratives are not limited to online platforms; they reverberate across global media. News outlets in India and beyond amplify these stories, portraying the United States as a nation struggling with racism, xenophobia, and religious intolerance. This depiction damages America’s reputation abroad, leading many to believe that the American dream is fading. Such perceptions overlook the significant contributions Indian-Americans have made to this country in various fields.

However, both the critics of the H-1B visa program and international skeptics fail to grasp the full picture. Indian-Americans are not defined by these attacks. They are not passive participants in America’s story—they are key contributors shaping its present and future. Through leadership, innovation, and an unwavering commitment to American ideals, Indian-Americans are helping propel the nation forward.

Indian-Americans are excelling in government, business, and technology, redefining leadership roles at every level. Kash Patel, a prominent attorney, is poised to assume the leadership of the FBI. Harmeet Dhillon, a civil rights lawyer from Chandigarh, has been appointed Assistant Attorney General. Meanwhile, entrepreneur and political commentator Vivek Ramaswamy is considering a run for governor in Ohio, potentially becoming the first Indian-American to lead a crucial swing state.

Former congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, a practicing Hindu, has been selected by President Trump to serve as Director of National Intelligence. Her appointment highlights the increasing presence of Indian-Americans in national security and the growing recognition of religious diversity in U.S. leadership. Gabbard’s outspoken embrace of her Hindu faith underscores the need to counter religious prejudice with education and pride.

In another historic milestone, Usha Vance, the wife of Vice President JD Vance, has become the first Indian-American Second Lady. A highly respected legal expert and former clerk for Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, Usha Vance exemplifies the contributions Indian-Americans continue to make to the country’s political and cultural landscape.

These figures represent just a fraction of the Indian-American impact on the U.S. Across generations, Indian-Americans have shattered barriers and transformed industries. Vice President Kamala Harris, whose mother immigrated from India, became the highest-ranking woman in U.S. history, with a potential path to the presidency. Tech industry titans Sundar Pichai and Satya Nadella continue to lead Google and Microsoft, revolutionizing the global technology sector.

Indian-American influence extends far beyond government and technology. In healthcare, approximately 100,000 Indian-American doctors and medical professionals serve communities across the country, providing essential care and contributing to medical advancements. In academia, Indian professors and researchers are shaping disciplines, mentoring future generations, and pushing the boundaries of scientific discovery. Their influence reaches finance, where Indian-Americans hold executive roles in major financial institutions, and entertainment, where they enrich American culture through storytelling and artistic expression.

Despite these remarkable achievements, Indian-Americans remain grounded in their heritage while embracing their American identity. They do not engage in divisive acts like flag-burning or denouncing their adopted homeland. Instead, they celebrate America’s values, contribute actively to its progress, and turn obstacles into opportunities. They take immense pride in their dual identities, strengthening the fabric of American society.

Nevertheless, criticisms of the H-1B visa program are not entirely unfounded. The program has undoubtedly provided a gateway for skilled professionals to contribute to the U.S. economy, but it is far from perfect. Many employers exploit the system, using it as a means to underpay workers and sideline American job seekers. For visa holders, the H-1B process often feels like a form of modern indentured servitude, trapping them in bureaucratic backlogs and limiting their career mobility.

The uncertainty surrounding visa renewals, coupled with the inability to change jobs freely, places immense stress on H-1B workers and their families. These structural flaws highlight the urgent need for reform. The system should be designed to reward merit and contributions rather than create hurdles that impede talented professionals from fully integrating into the workforce.

Fixing the H-1B program is not just about fairness—it is about unlocking the full potential of America’s workforce. Meaningful reform would introduce greater transparency, establish wage protections, and ensure that skilled immigrants are not exploited. By addressing these issues, the U.S. can maintain its competitive edge in science, technology, and innovation. With Silicon Valley’s continued advocacy and influence on policymakers, there is hope that these longstanding problems will finally be resolved.

The story of Indian-Americans is one of perseverance, ambition, and extraordinary success. They have overcome adversity, broken through barriers, and left an indelible mark on every sector of American life. Their contributions far outweigh the hostility of critics, proving that America remains a land of opportunity for those who strive to make a difference.

By reforming broken systems and addressing systemic challenges, the U.S. can fully harness the talents of Indian-Americans and other immigrant communities. This is not just about fixing an immigration policy—it is about reaffirming the principles that make America a beacon of hope and progress.

Indian-Americans will continue to rise above the noise, driven by resilience and the pursuit of excellence. Their presence in leadership, business, and innovation will shape America’s future, ensuring that the nation remains at the forefront of global progress. The challenges they face only serve to strengthen their resolve, reinforcing the idea that hard work and determination can overcome even the most entrenched prejudices.

In the end, the American dream remains alive—not just for Indian-Americans but for all who believe in the promise of a better future through perseverance and contribution.

Indian Hotels Expands Amid Tourism Boom, but Rising Costs Push Indians Abroad

Staff ReporterTourism 0

Indian Hotels (IHTL.NS), the parent company of the luxury Taj brand, is establishing itself as a key player in India’s booming tourism sector. The $12 billion company announced on Monday that it is developing its fifth hotel in Mumbai, with an ambitious plan to expand its portfolio to over 700 properties by 2030. At least 10% of these new additions will be located overseas. However, as hotel rates surge domestically, an increasing number of Indian travelers are considering international destinations.

Despite broader concerns about a slowdown in domestic consumption affecting the Indian economy, Indian Hotels remains resilient. In the three months ending December, the company posted revenue of 25.9 billion rupees ($296 million), reflecting a 29% year-on-year increase. Its EBITDA margin also expanded by 80 basis points, surpassing 39%. Over the past year, the company’s stock has outperformed the Nifty 50 (.NSEI) by 34 percentage points. Indian Hotels currently trades at 63 times its projected earnings for the 2025 financial year—nearly double the valuation multiple of global hotel giants like Marriott International (MAR.O) and Hilton Hotel (HLT.N).

One of the key drivers of this surge is the spending power of affluent Indians, who are investing heavily in luxury weddings and high-profile events. There is a growing appetite for unique experiences. For example, Coldplay’s concert in Ahmedabad in January attracted 134,000 attendees, and the demand for accommodations pushed rates to extreme levels. A nearby Taj property charged as much as 120,000 rupees ($1,386) for a two-night stay in a double-occupancy room.

This is not an isolated case. A shortage of hotels in premium locations is causing prices to escalate across the board, even as the number of foreign visitors to India remains below pre-pandemic levels.

However, as domestic travel costs rise, international destinations are becoming more attractive to Indian tourists. According to Amit Kumar of HDFC Securities, once expenses within India reach a certain threshold, traveling abroad starts to seem like a better value. A study by Capital Economics predicts that India, currently the world’s 10th-largest source of outbound tourists, could rise to fourth place by 2035, trailing only the United States, China, and Germany. Popular destinations for Indian travelers include the Maldives, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, and Thailand.

Despite Indian Hotels’ success, analysts are raising concerns about the long-term sustainability of high domestic hotel rates. Karan Khanna of Ambit Capital warns that an unexpected surge in hotel supply could bring prices down more quickly than anticipated. Competing brands, such as ITC Hotels (ITCT.NS), have already announced significant expansion plans, particularly in smaller cities.

To address these uncertainties, Indian Hotels is focusing on a capital-light investment strategy. For now, though, it continues to thrive, benefiting from India’s growing appetite for luxury experiences.

On January 17, Indian Hotels Company reported revenue of 25.9 billion rupees ($296 million) for the three months ending in December, marking a 29% year-on-year increase. Net profit also grew 29%, reaching 5.8 billion rupees.

Pushpa 2: The Rule (Reloaded Version) Dominates Netflix’s Global Charts

Staff ReporterFilm 0

Pushpa 2: The Rule (Reloaded Version) has taken the global streaming scene by storm, securing its place on Netflix’s Global Top Ten Films (Non-English) for the second consecutive week. Currently ranked #3 worldwide, the film is trending in 14 countries, amassing an impressive 9.4 million views over two weeks. This milestone underscores the massive reach of the action-packed blockbuster and the electrifying screen presence of its star, Allu Arjun. Available in Telugu, Hindi, Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam, Bengali, and English, the film continues to captivate audiences across cultures and languages.

Star-Studded Ensemble and Visionary Filmmaking

Directed by Sukumar and produced by Mythri Movie Makers in collaboration with Sukumar Writings, Pushpa 2: The Rule features a powerhouse cast, including Allu Arjun, Rashmika Mandanna, Fahadh Faasil, Jagapathi Babu, Sunil, Anasuya Bharadwaj, Rao Ramesh, and Ajay.

Allu Arjun, whose stellar performance has won hearts worldwide, expressed gratitude for the film’s overwhelming success. “The love and adulation for Pushpa 2: The Rule (Reloaded Version) from across the world is truly overwhelming. This film was made with blood, sweat, and heart — and to see it connect with audiences at such a massive scale is beyond gratifying. I am incredibly proud of the film’s success on Netflix. Through the platform, our story is reaching millions across different countries, breaking language and cultural barriers. And I’m deeply grateful to the fans whose unwavering support and excitement continue to fuel this journey,” he shared.

Director Sukumar highlighted how the film builds upon its predecessor’s legacy. “Pushpa: The Rise set the stage for a world and a character that audiences embraced wholeheartedly, and with Pushpa 2: The Rule, we wanted to take that legacy forward in an even bigger, more immersive way. The film’s success on Netflix is a testament to the universal appeal of Indian cinema, and I’m grateful for the love it continues to receive,” he said.

Netflix Celebrates the Blockbuster’s Success

Monika Shergill, Vice President of Content at Netflix India, emphasized the film’s impact. “Pushpa 2: The Rule Continues, India’s biggest blockbuster, is now one of the most-watched films on Netflix. The raw intensity of its characters, combined with the fearless vision of director Sukumar and the teams at Mythri Movie Makers, has set new benchmarks for Indian cinema. We are proud to bring this reloaded edition featuring new scenes that deliver an even more thrilling experience for our audiences. As its influence continues to break boundaries, this reloaded edition stands as a must-watch for our audiences all over the world,” she stated.

A Cultural Phenomenon

With its high-octane action sequences and the now-iconic ‘Jathara’ scene, where Arjun dons a saree, Pushpa 2: The Rule has earned widespread acclaim from both fans and critics. From India to international markets, the film is redefining mass entertainment, proving that the fire of Pushpa’s legacy burns brighter than ever.

Pushpa 2: The Rule (Reloaded Version) is now streaming on Netflix in Telugu, Hindi, Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam, Bengali, and English.

Indian Rupee Hits Record Low Amid U.S. Tariff Concerns, RBI Intervenes

Staff ReporterMoney 0

The Indian rupee fell to a record low on Monday as concerns over potential U.S. trade tariffs triggered losses across regional currencies, prompting likely intervention from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), traders reported.

The rupee slid to 87.95 per U.S. dollar in early trading, breaching its previous all-time low of 87.5825 recorded last week. By 9:40 a.m. IST, the currency was quoted at 87.9050, marking a 0.5% decline for the day.

State-run banks were observed selling U.S. dollars before the local spot market opened, an action traders attributed to RBI intervention aimed at stabilizing the currency. While the rupee was poised to weaken further past the 88 level, these interventions helped it hold above this psychological threshold.

On Sunday, U.S. President Donald Trump announced plans to impose fresh 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports and introduce reciprocal tariffs on all countries matching their respective trade levies. This news drove the dollar index higher to 108.3, while Asian currencies weakened between 0.1% and 0.6%.

Since Trump’s victory in the U.S. elections last November, the rupee has depreciated by approximately 4.5%. The decline has been exacerbated by slowing economic growth and persistent foreign capital outflows.

Foreign investors have offloaded more than $7.5 billion from Indian stocks and bonds on a net basis so far this year, adding pressure on the rupee.

Amid these headwinds, the RBI has frequently intervened to curb excessive currency volatility. However, these efforts have strained India’s foreign exchange reserves, which are hovering near an 11-month low.

“We believe the risks to INR over coming months are skewed towards relative weakness. If the broad USD were to weaken, we believe the downside in USD/INR would be mitigated by active RBI FX purchases,” Nomura noted in a report.

US Tightens Visa Interview Waiver Rules, Impacting Indian Applicants

Staff ReporterImmigration 0

Indian travelers renewing U.S. visas now face a new challenge as the U.S. Department of State has abruptly shortened the eligibility window for visa interview waivers (dropbox) from 48 months to just 12 months. This sudden change complicates the renewal process for thousands of Indian applicants.

The revised policy, which takes immediate effect, affects nonimmigrant visa holders such as H-1B and B1/B2 applicants. These individuals previously benefited from more flexible rules introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic to ease consular backlogs.

Now, only applicants renewing a visa in the same nonimmigrant classification that expired within the past 12 months will qualify for dropbox processing, according to The National Law Review.

Though there has been no official government announcement, Visa Application Centers (VACs) have already begun turning away applicants who no longer meet the updated criteria.

Previously, the dropbox process was available for visa renewals if the prior visa had expired within the past 48 months—a policy designed to address pandemic-related delays. With the sudden rollback, many travelers will now be required to attend in-person interviews, adding further strain to an already overburdened system.

Impact on Indian Visa Holders

This change significantly affects holders of H-1B, L-1, O-1, and other nonimmigrant visas, many of whom now face:

  • Increased demand for in-person appointments at U.S. consulates.
  • Longer wait times for visa interviews, especially in high-demand locations.
  • Possible travel disruptions for business travelers and professionals requiring swift renewals.

Reason Behind the Policy Shift

The U.S. is experiencing record-high visa demand. Despite ongoing challenges, 1.76 million Indians traveled to the U.S. in 2023, according to the U.S. Department of State.

In 2022, B1/B2 visa appointment wait times in India had exceeded 999 days, prompting the 48-month dropbox extension to help reduce the backlog. However, these long delays persist, with current wait times for visa interviews still exceeding a year in major Indian cities:

  • Delhi & Mumbai: Over 440 days
  • Chennai: 436 days
  • Hyderabad: 429 days
  • Kolkata: 415 days

What Applicants Can Do

Given the sudden rule change, applicants should take the following steps:

  • Confirm Eligibility: If your visa expired more than 12 months ago or you are applying in a different category, you will need to schedule an in-person interview.
  • Plan for Delays: With long wait times and the new policy expected to create further backlogs, travelers should prepare for extended processing times.
  • Consider Premium Processing: Those renewing H-1B visas may benefit from premium processing to minimize travel disruptions.

The rollback comes at a time when Indian visa applicants are already grappling with lengthy wait times. With increased demand and a limited number of interview slots, securing timely visa renewals is set to become even more challenging.

Severe Arctic Blast to Grip U.S. in Deep Freeze as Polar Vortex Stretches Again

Staff ReporterEnvironment 0

The coldest Arctic blast of the season is set to engulf much of the United States, marking yet another intense polar vortex event in what has already been a winter of repeated frigid invasions, meteorologists warn. The icy grip is expected to persist throughout next week.

Unusual weather patterns in the Arctic are causing the typically confined frigid air near the North Pole to spill southward, affecting both the U.S. and parts of Europe, according to meteorologists interviewed by The Associated Press.

This marks the 10th time this winter that the polar vortex—a system that normally contains the coldest Arctic air—has stretched southward, said Judah Cohen, seasonal forecast director at Atmospheric and Environmental Research. By contrast, a typical winter sees only two or three such events.

From record snowfall in New Orleans to drought and devastating wildfires in Southern California, this winter has been anything but ordinary.

Bitter Cold to Dominate the Central and Eastern U.S.

The impending Arctic outbreak is expected to first hit the northern Rockies and northern Plains by Saturday, lingering throughout the week. The cold will be most intense east of the Rockies, sparing only the far western U.S. and parts of central and southern Florida.

On Tuesday, temperatures across the Lower 48 states are forecasted to average 16.6 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 8.6 Celsius), dropping further to 14 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 10 Celsius) by Wednesday, according to calculations by private meteorologist Ryan Maue, a former chief scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

By next week, about 89% of the contiguous U.S. will experience freezing temperatures, with 27% of the Lower 48 seeing subzero conditions (minus 18 degrees Celsius), per National Weather Service projections.

Adding to the misery, strong winds will make the cold even more punishing. Every U.S. state—except Hawaii, California, and Florida—will likely experience wind chills of 20 degrees or lower at some point, the National Weather Service predicts.

Kansas, Nebraska, Missouri, and Iowa will bear the brunt of the Arctic chill, with temperatures plummeting as much as 35 degrees Fahrenheit (19 degrees Celsius) below normal, said Zack Taylor, a meteorologist at the Weather Prediction Center. NOAA models forecast subzero lows in Oklahoma, Colorado, Nebraska, Missouri, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan by Wednesday.

Potential for Storms and Nor’easter

The extended period of extreme cold may also bring storms, including heavy snowfall, flooding, or possibly a nor’easter, though exact details remain uncertain, Taylor noted.

“All the stars align—all the wind directions in the atmosphere are dragging the cold polar air out of the Canadian Arctic,” Maue said. “It’s the depths of winter. Everything signals extreme, biting winter cold. This isn’t the first polar vortex event of the season, but it looks to be the most severe.”

Unusual Polar Vortex Behavior Under Scrutiny

Unlike traditional polar vortex disruptions—where sudden warming weakens the vortex and allows cold air to escape south—this event involves stretching rather than breaking. According to Cohen, the vortex remains strong but elongates and bends, resulting in outbreaks that, while extreme, are generally less severe than full vortex collapses. Stretch events like this tend to impact the U.S. more than Europe.

Meteorologists are analyzing why this type of stretching is occurring so frequently this year. It could simply be a result of natural climate variability, said Laura Ciasto, a NOAA meteorologist specializing in the polar vortex.

“What we’re observing right now is interesting, but not unprecedented,” said Martin Stendel, a scientist at Denmark’s National Center for Climate Research.

A contributing factor is a high-pressure system over Greenland, which is shifting westward and altering the jet stream. This change is creating a pattern that allows Arctic air to surge southward and linger, Cohen explained.

Some scientists, including Stendel, suggest that human-induced climate change may be making the jet stream more erratic, increasing the likelihood of these prolonged, wavy weather patterns.

Cold Winter Amid Global Warming

Despite the frigid conditions in much of the U.S., the planet continues to experience a broader warming trend. January set another global temperature record, marking the 18th time in the past 19 months that the Earth exceeded the internationally recognized warming threshold of 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.

With an unprecedented number of polar vortex disruptions this winter, meteorologists remain uncertain about when this extreme cold pattern will finally break.

India’s Census Delay Raises Concerns Over Data Accuracy and Social Policy

Staff ReporterIndia 0

India, the world’s most populous country, has not conducted a national census since 2011, breaking a long-standing tradition of tracking demographic changes every ten years. This prolonged delay has left policymakers, social workers, and economists struggling with outdated data, making it difficult to address social and economic challenges effectively.

As Suman Musadkar, a social worker in Mumbai’s Govandi neighborhood, walked through its narrow alleyways, she could only estimate the local population. “The population is around 6,000 people,” she told CBC News, but she lacked precise figures on the number of children or vulnerable individuals needing assistance. Without updated census data, critical social services, such as maternal health and malnutrition interventions, remain inadequate.

Why Has the Census Been Delayed?

India has conducted a census every decade since 1872. However, the COVID-19 pandemic initially forced officials to postpone the 2021 survey. While that delay was understandable, experts are now questioning why the process has still not started four years later.

Pronab Sen, a former chief statistician of India, warned that sample surveys used to estimate economic indicators, inflation, and employment become increasingly unreliable the further removed they are from the last census. “There’s a massive information gap,” he told CBC News, noting that policymakers are working with outdated data as India’s population continues to grow and migrate.

Despite repeated calls to resume the census, India’s Home Affairs Minister Amit Shah said in September that the government would begin the process “very soon,” though no updates have followed.

Political and Economic Implications

The delay has sparked political controversy, with the opposition Congress Party repeatedly pressing Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government for answers. Senior Congress leader Sonia Gandhi argued that 140 million Indians are being denied benefits under the national food security law because outdated population data underestimates the number of eligible recipients.

Adding to the debate, the Congress has demanded that the census include a “caste census,” which would provide updated data on India’s social hierarchy. Caste-based inequality remains a significant issue, with the richest 5% of Indians controlling 60% of the country’s wealth, according to Oxfam International. While India has implemented affirmative action policies to address caste disparities, they have been based only on estimates, as the country has not conducted a caste census since 1931.

Critics suspect the Modi government may be deliberately delaying the census to avoid releasing politically sensitive data. Some analysts argue that if the census had been a priority, it would have been conducted immediately after the pandemic in 2021. Others suggest that the government may be reluctant to enumerate the population sizes of disadvantaged groups, fearing political consequences.

Challenges in Conducting the Census

Organizing India’s census is a mammoth task, requiring an estimated 2.5 million government workers to be temporarily reassigned as census enumerators. The pandemic also triggered mass migration within the country, further complicating data collection. “We don’t know where they’ve gone,” Sen said, explaining that many people moved from cities back to rural areas but were never officially tracked.

Despite growing concerns from economists, social workers, and policymakers, there has been little public pressure from government ministries. “Every ministry that delivers public welfare should be yelling and screaming about the lack of updated statistics,” Sen said. “I don’t even hear that.”

Until a new census is conducted, India’s policymakers will continue to operate with incomplete and outdated data, making it difficult to allocate resources effectively and address the country’s growing economic and social disparities.

Modi and Trump Discuss Trade, Tariffs, and Strategic Partnerships

Staff ReporterWorld 0

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump convened at the White House to deliberate on trade and other bilateral matters.

During their meeting, Trump disclosed an agreement for India to increase imports of American oil and gas, a move intended to help reduce the trade deficit between the two nations.

This discussion followed Trump’s recent announcement of a new reciprocal tariff policy. The US president remarked that “our allies are worse than our enemies” regarding import duties, emphasizing his administration’s stance on trade imbalances.

The reciprocal tariffs, which will be applicable to all US trading partners, are the latest in a series of trade measures introduced by the Trump administration. However, a definitive implementation date has yet to be established. Trump has previously used tariff threats as a negotiation strategy.

Trade and Tariffs Take Center Stage

Donald Trump has often referred to tariffs as “the most beautiful word in the dictionary,” and today was no exception.

Before sitting down with Modi, Trump spent nearly an hour addressing the media about his “reciprocal tariffs” strategy. Details remain scarce, but the approach seems to involve imposing tariffs on countries based on the trade restrictions they impose on US goods.

The meeting between Modi and Trump largely focused on this issue. “Whatever India charges, we charge them,” Trump told a room packed with reporters awaiting an update on their bilateral discussions.

Apart from tariff talks, the two leaders worked on strengthening trade relations. Modi highlighted India’s interest in securing its energy needs through increased trade in oil and gas with the US. Meanwhile, Trump confirmed that military sales to India would also be expanded.

Concerns Over Immigration Policies

Trump’s return to the White House has rekindled anxiety among Indian professionals working in the US, particularly those on H-1B visas.

During his first term, Trump tightened restrictions on the H-1B visa program, significantly increasing rejection rates from 5-8% under President Obama to 24% in 2018. Although it remains uncertain whether such policies will be reinstated, many Indian workers fear renewed challenges.

While some industry leaders, including Tesla CEO Elon Musk, have expressed support for the H-1B system, Trump’s administration remains divided on immigration policy.

Indians, who account for 72% of all H-1B visas issued, are especially vulnerable. Their concerns extend beyond visa restrictions to potential hostility toward Indian immigrants.

One of the most pressing issues is Trump’s attempt to deny automatic US citizenship to children born to temporary foreign workers. Although blocked by federal courts, the policy could be revived through higher judicial rulings.

A shift in birthright citizenship laws would disproportionately impact the Indian community. With over five million Indians in the US holding non-immigrant visas, many expectant parents are anxiously seeking clarity on their children’s legal status.

From ‘Namaste Trump!’ to ‘Howdy, Modi!’

Trump and Modi have shared a warm diplomatic relationship. In 2020, Modi hosted Trump in India with a grand rally at the world’s largest cricket stadium in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The event, called “Namaste Trump!,” featured music and dance performances, drawing tens of thousands of attendees.

During his address, Modi lauded Trump’s leadership, stating, “Trump thinks big and the world knows what he has done to realise the American dream.”

This visit followed the “Howdy, Modi!” event in 2019, where Modi and Trump addressed 50,000 members of the Indian diaspora at a Houston football stadium. The two leaders exchanged smiles and hugs while making strong proclamations about their growing partnership.

However, analysts suggest that these events, while grand spectacles, are also strategic diplomatic moves aimed at solidifying ties between the two nations.

Shifts Since the ‘Howdy, Modi!’ Event

Much has changed since Modi’s 2019 visit to Houston, where he and Trump were the center of a large-scale community event.

At the time, Trump described the gathering as a “profoundly historic event,” possibly the largest reception of a foreign leader in US history. For Modi, the event was a platform to showcase India’s growing global influence and his popularity among the Indian diaspora.

Five years later, their relationship remains strong, but the US-India dynamic has grown more complex.

Modi, though still a popular leader, has faced political challenges at home, failing to secure an outright majority in last year’s elections. India’s economy has slowed, prompting foreign investors to withdraw capital.

Tensions over trade and H-1B visa policies persist, and diplomatic relations were tested last year after an alleged plot by an Indian agent to assassinate a Sikh separatist in the US.

However, India’s role as a strategic counterbalance to China remains a crucial element of US foreign policy.

Modi’s Agenda in Washington

Modi’s visit comes at a delicate moment, as his “Make in India” initiative faces challenges from Trump’s “America First” policy.

Unlike their 2017 meeting in Washington, which was marked by camaraderie, this visit is overshadowed by global trade disputes and Trump’s emphasis on tariffs. The White House has already announced plans for new reciprocal tariffs on Indian imports.

Modi’s primary goal is to mitigate the impact of these tariffs while ensuring that India remains an indispensable US ally.

He stated that he is open to lowering tariffs on American goods, repatriating undocumented Indian nationals, and increasing US imports of American oil to help balance trade.

Beyond trade, Modi aims to enhance cooperation in technology, defense, and energy, emphasizing common strategic interests.

Politically, he is using the visit to reaffirm India’s status as a key US partner in the Indo-Pacific, particularly in countering China’s growing influence.

While Trump’s voter base views India as an economic competitor, the personal rapport between the two leaders may help ease tensions.

The Strategic Importance of US-India Relations

Modi is among the first foreign leaders to visit Trump in his second presidential term, underscoring the significance of US-India relations.

Both nations share deep concerns over China’s ambitions and are part of the Quad alliance, aimed at countering Beijing’s influence in the Asia-Pacific.

Trade ties between the two countries are also substantial. The US is India’s second-largest trading partner, while India serves as a major market for American multinational corporations.

In recent years, companies like Taiwan’s Foxconn—an Apple supplier—have been shifting production to India as part of a broader move away from reliance on China.

The two countries also maintain strong people-to-people ties, driven by the large Indian diaspora in the US. However, illegal migration from India has become a growing concern for Washington.

Earlier this month, a US military aircraft deported a group of shackled Indian migrants back to India. Their treatment sparked outrage among India’s opposition leaders, adding another layer of diplomatic tension to an already complex relationship.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Sworn in as Trump’s Health Secretary Amid Vaccine Skepticism

Staff ReporterUSA 0

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. officially took office as Secretary of the Health and Human Services (HHS) Department on Thursday after a narrow Senate confirmation vote, placing him in charge of a $1.7 trillion budget that oversees vaccine policies, food safety regulations, and health insurance programs that impact nearly half of the U.S. population.

The Senate voted 52-48 in favor of Kennedy, with nearly all Republicans backing former President Donald Trump’s nominee despite reservations about his controversial views on vaccines. Every Democrat opposed his confirmation.

The only Republican to break ranks was Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell, who had polio as a child. His opposition mirrored his stance against Trump’s previous nominees for Secretary of Defense and Director of National Intelligence.

“I’m a survivor of childhood polio. In my lifetime, I’ve watched vaccines save millions of lives from devastating diseases across America and around the world,” McConnell stated. “I will not condone the re-litigation of proven cures, and neither will millions of Americans who credit their survival and quality of life to scientific miracles.”

Shortly after taking office, Kennedy appeared on Fox News with Laura Ingraham and announced his intention to establish a more rigorous system to monitor vaccine side effects.

Republicans have largely embraced Kennedy’s approach to public health, particularly his focus on tackling chronic illnesses like obesity.

“We’ve got to get into the business of making America healthy again,” said Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, who believes Kennedy will introduce a “fresh perspective” to the role.

During his swearing-in ceremony at the Oval Office, Kennedy was accompanied by his wife, other family members, and several members of Congress. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch administered the oath. Reflecting on his connection to the White House, Kennedy recalled visiting as a child in 1961, when his uncle, President John F. Kennedy, was in office.

Trump announced that Kennedy would lead a new commission to study chronic diseases, an initiative Kennedy praised. He described Trump as a “pivotal historical figure” and expressed gratitude for his role in his life and career.

Kennedy, 71, has long been in the public eye due to his family legacy and personal tragedies. Over the years, he has cultivated a dedicated following through his outspoken views on food safety, chemicals, and vaccines—stances that have at times veered into extreme territory.

His influence grew significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic when he devoted much of his efforts to a nonprofit organization that filed lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers. He also leveraged social media to foster skepticism about vaccines and the government agencies responsible for promoting them.

Despite his history of questioning vaccine safety, Kennedy, with Trump’s endorsement, argued that he was in a unique position to restore trust in public health institutions like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., voiced optimism about Kennedy’s potential to reshape the health care system, saying he hoped Kennedy “goes wild” in curbing medical costs and improving overall public health.

However, before offering his support, Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., a physician and chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, sought assurances from Kennedy that he would not alter existing vaccine recommendations.

During his confirmation hearings, Senate Democrats repeatedly challenged Kennedy to disavow the long-debunked claim that vaccines cause autism. Some legislators also raised concerns about whether Kennedy could personally profit from altering vaccine policies or weakening legal protections for pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines.

Financial disclosures revealed that Kennedy earned more than $850,000 last year through a referral arrangement with a law firm that has sued the manufacturers of Gardasil, a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine that helps prevent cervical cancer. To address potential conflicts of interest, Kennedy pledged that if confirmed, he would redirect the earnings from this arrangement to his son.

Kennedy assumes leadership of HHS amid a sweeping federal restructuring led by billionaire Elon Musk. This overhaul has resulted in the suspension—at least temporarily—of billions of dollars in public health funding, leaving thousands of federal employees uncertain about their job security.

On Friday, the NIH announced that it would limit billions of dollars allocated to medical research, particularly in areas such as cancer and Alzheimer’s treatment.

Kennedy has also called for a major shake-up within the NIH, FDA, and CDC. Last year, he vowed to terminate 600 employees at the NIH, which serves as the nation’s largest financial supporter of biomedical research.

In his Fox News interview, Kennedy reiterated his plans to overhaul staffing at HHS and its affiliated agencies, targeting officials responsible for what he views as poor decisions regarding nutrition guidelines and Alzheimer’s treatments.

“I have a list in my head,” Kennedy said, referring to potential dismissals within the agency.

Trump Faces Challenges in Delivering Economic Promises Amid Inflation Concerns

Staff ReporterMoney 0

During his 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump made bold economic promises aimed at addressing what was one of the top concerns for voters. “Starting on Day 1, we will end inflation and make America affordable again,” he declared at an August campaign event.

Trump’s sweeping economic pledges were widely seen as a significant factor in his electoral success. However, since taking office, he has shifted his stance on how quickly his plans will yield results.

For instance, as CNBC reported, inflation remains a pressing issue:

The consumer price index, which tracks the cost of goods and services across the U.S. economy, rose by a seasonally adjusted 0.5% in the past month, bringing the annual inflation rate to 3%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. These figures surpassed Dow Jones estimates, which had projected monthly inflation at 0.3% and an annual rate of 2.9%. Additionally, the annual rate showed a 0.1 percentage point increase from December.

Following the release of this report, Trump was quick to blame his predecessor. “BIDEN INFLATION UP!” he posted on Truth Social.

While various factors contribute to rising prices, experts argue that inflation cannot be attributed solely to either Trump or former President Joe Biden. However, analysts have suggested that Trump’s proposed economic policies—such as tax cuts and tariffs—could potentially worsen inflation.

Trump began tempering expectations regarding his campaign trail promises soon after securing victory. In a late November interview with Time magazine, he acknowledged the difficulty of reducing costs. “I would like to bring down the price of groceries,” he stated. “But it’s hard to bring things down once they’re up. You know, it’s very hard. But I think that they will.”

Since returning to office, Trump’s administration has also sought to adjust public expectations. Vice President JD Vance remarked in an interview with CBS News last month that addressing grocery prices would require patience. “It’s going to take a little bit of time,” he said.

“Rome wasn’t built in a day,” Vance added.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also echoed this sentiment, telling reporters last week that the president is “doing everything he can” to lower high consumer prices in the U.S. However, when asked for a specific timeline and whether Americans would be willing to wait for the administration’s measures to take effect, she admitted, “I don’t have a timeline.”

UAE Introduces Blue Visa to Recognize Environmental Leaders with 10-Year Residency

Staff ReporterImmigration 0

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has rolled out the first phase of its Blue Visa, a long-term residency initiative aimed at honoring individuals who have made outstanding contributions to environmental protection and sustainability.

This newly introduced 10-year visa underscores the country’s commitment to sustainability efforts, providing exclusive advantages to global environmental leaders.

Understanding the Blue Visa

The UAE Blue Visa is a 10-year residency permit granted to individuals who have shown exceptional dedication to environmental conservation. This initiative is designed to acknowledge and support thought leaders, innovators, and advocates working towards global sustainability, both within the UAE and internationally.

This visa was officially unveiled at the World Governments Summit 2025 and serves as an extension of the UAE’s existing Golden and Green Visas, which are targeted at investors, entrepreneurs, and skilled professionals. The introduction of the Blue Visa aligns with the nation’s broader sustainability goals, which have been a primary focus throughout 2024.

Eligibility for the Blue Visa

The UAE’s Blue Visa is available to a diverse group of individuals who have actively contributed to environmental preservation. Those eligible for this residency program include:

  • Members of international organizations
  • Representatives of global companies
  • Individuals affiliated with environmental associations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
  • Recipients of international awards in environmental fields
  • Notable activists and researchers focused on environmental work
  • UAE citizens and residents advocating for environmental protection

By adopting an inclusive approach, the UAE ensures that individuals from various backgrounds and expertise levels are recognized for their contributions to sustainability.

Advantages of the UAE Blue Visa

In addition to offering long-term residency, the Blue Visa provides a host of benefits aimed at fostering environmental progress:

  • A 10-year residency permit in the UAE
  • Opportunities to collaborate on sustainability-driven projects
  • Access to financial resources and environmental funding
  • Recognition for contributions to environmental conservation
  • Potential nominations for additional grants and awards

These incentives are intended to empower visa holders to further their environmental efforts and enhance their global impact.

Application Process for the UAE Blue Visa

Individuals interested in applying for the Blue Visa can do so through the Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs, and Port Security (ICP). The application process includes two primary routes:

  1. Direct Application: Individuals may submit their applications through the ICP’s official website or mobile application.
  2. Nomination Process: Government agencies focused on sustainability can nominate individuals based on their environmental contributions.

The initial phase of this program involves electronic approvals, with applications being assessed in accordance with ICP-approved procedures.

UAE’s Broader Long-Term Residency Initiatives

Over recent years, the UAE has launched several long-term residency programs to attract skilled professionals and investors. These include:

  • Golden Visa (10 years): Offered to investors, entrepreneurs, scientists, outstanding students, and humanitarian pioneers.
  • Green Visa (5 years): Designed for skilled professionals, freelancers, investors, and entrepreneurs.

With the introduction of the Blue Visa, the UAE expands its long-term residency programs to specifically recognize individuals committed to environmental change.

Conclusion

The UAE’s Blue Visa marks a significant step toward fostering global environmental cooperation by honoring individuals dedicated to sustainability. By offering a long-term residency along with numerous benefits, the UAE aims to attract the most talented minds in climate action and conservation.

For eligible individuals, this visa presents a unique opportunity to participate in meaningful environmental projects while enjoying long-term residency in one of the world’s most dynamic nations.

Examining the Role of Christian Evangelism in India’s Social Transformation and Comparative Analysis of Religions

Staff ReporterReligion 0

The question of whether Christian evangelism is contributing positively to India’s social fabric has sparked considerable debate. Proponents argue that the acceptance of Christ among many Indians has led to the eradication of certain social ills, fostering progress and modernization. They point to the fact that many Christian-majority countries are often seen as more modern, educated, and inclusive compared to others. These nations are known for welcoming diverse religions and cultures, which some attribute to the influence of Christian values. However, it is important to note that while conservative factions exist within Christianity, as they do in every religion, they are not representative of the entire community.

One argument in favor of Christian evangelism’s positive impact is the emphasis on education and social development. Christians in India are often regarded as one of the most educated and prosperous religious groups. This is attributed to their focus on education and access to basic facilities rather than being preoccupied with religious dogma. As one observer noted, “Christians don’t give a damn about religious shits. They focus on education and basic facilities.” This pragmatic approach has arguably contributed to their socio-economic advancement.

Comparisons are often drawn between Christianity and other religions, particularly Islam, which some describe as the most radical religion. Critics highlight the challenges faced by minorities in many Muslim-majority countries, pointing out that out of 56 Muslim nations, few can match India in terms of citizen security, minority rights, and human development indices. Pakistan, for instance, is often cited as a country where minorities face significant persecution, despite being a nuclear-armed state. While there are exceptions like Indonesia and Saudi Arabia, where conditions for minorities are relatively better, the overall perception remains that Muslim-majority nations lag behind in these areas.

On the other hand, Christianity is often associated with peace and tolerance. It is rare to hear of Christians being involved in international or national bomb blasts. As one commentator noted, “I don’t think that you have heard any Christian name in any international bomb blasts or in national also. Maybe 2 or 3 but not more.” This perception has bolstered the image of Christianity as a religion that promotes harmony and non-violence.

However, it is crucial to acknowledge that no religious group is without its flaws. Instances of misconduct by Christian missionaries have been reported, but these are often seen as exceptions rather than the rule. As the same observer remarked, “Yes, I have heard some bad news about Christian missionaries, but bad people are in every group.” This sentiment underscores the idea that negative actions by a few should not overshadow the broader contributions of a community.

Interestingly, the cultural exchange between Christians and Hindus has also been a point of fascination. Many Christians from Europe have shown a deep interest in Hindu temples and Indian culture, often displaying more enthusiasm than some Hindus themselves. This cultural curiosity has been described as follows: “I have seen that many Christians from Europe come to Hindu temples and take interest more than Hindus. They are actually crazy about our culture.” This mutual appreciation highlights the potential for interfaith harmony and collaboration.

In conclusion, the role of Christian evangelism in India’s social transformation is a complex and multifaceted issue. While there are arguments that it has contributed positively by promoting education, eradicating social ills, and fostering a culture of tolerance, it is essential to recognize that no religion is monolithic. Each has its strengths and weaknesses, and the actions of a few should not define the entire community. As India continues to evolve, the interplay between different religions and their impact on society will remain a topic of significant interest and debate.

PM Modi and Google CEO Sundar Pichai Discuss AI’s Role in India’s Digital Transformation at Paris Summit

Staff ReporterTechnology 0

Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with Google CEO Sundar Pichai during the AI Action Summit in Paris, where they discussed the immense potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in India. The meeting, held on the sidelines of the event, focused on AI’s transformative impact and how Google can collaborate with India in its digital journey.

The Indian-origin CEO of Alphabet Inc. emphasized the importance of this partnership, highlighting the role Google could play in accelerating India’s technological advancement.

On Tuesday, February 11, 2025, Prime Minister Modi co-chaired the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit alongside French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris.

Reflecting on the historical impact of technology, PM Modi stated at the summit that advancements in AI will not result in job losses but rather create new opportunities.

Following the meeting, Pichai took to social media to share his enthusiasm, posting on X: “Delighted to meet with PM @narendramodi today while in Paris for the AI Action Summit. We discussed the incredible opportunities AI will bring to India and ways we can work closely together on India’s digital transformation.” His post was accompanied by pictures from their discussion.

This meeting marked the latest interaction between PM Modi and Pichai, following their previous engagement in September 2024 in New York. That meeting took place during the Prime Minister’s visit to the United States for the Quad Leaders’ Summit, which was hosted by President Joe Biden in Wilmington, Delaware.

At Tuesday’s AI Action Summit, Modi and Macron led the plenary session of the major global event, emphasizing the need for international cooperation in AI governance.

Reiterating his excitement, Pichai’s post on X read: “Delighted to meet with PM @narendramodi today while in Paris for the AI Action Summit. We discussed the incredible opportunities AI will bring to India and ways we can work closely together on India’s digital transformation.”

During his address at the summit, PM Modi strongly advocated for a collective effort to develop a global AI framework that is open-source, trustworthy, and transparent. He emphasized that AI technology must remain free from biases and must be designed to enhance reliability.

Furthermore, the Prime Minister stressed the importance of embedding AI in the local ecosystem, ensuring that it remains practical and beneficial to society. He underlined that artificial intelligence is not just influencing technology but is significantly shaping political, economic, security, and social spheres worldwide.

“AI is writing the code for humanity in this century,” Modi stated, underscoring the transformative nature of artificial intelligence.

As the world stands at the threshold of an AI-driven era, the Prime Minister acknowledged its potential to redefine the future. “We are at the dawn of the AI age that will shape the course of humanity,” he said.

Trump Proposes Reciprocal Tariffs to Match Foreign Tax Rates, Sparking Trade Concerns

Staff ReporterBusiness 0

President Donald Trump announced on Thursday a plan to raise U.S. tariffs to align with the tax rates imposed by other countries on imports. This move could lead to broader economic tensions with both allies and competitors as Trump aims to eliminate trade imbalances.

“I’ve decided for purposes of fairness that I will charge a reciprocal tariff,” Trump declared during a proclamation signing in the Oval Office. “It’s fair to all. No other country can complain.”

Trump’s Republican administration has argued that these new tariffs would create a level playing field for U.S. and foreign manufacturers. However, current laws suggest that the additional taxes would ultimately be borne by American consumers and businesses, either directly or through increased prices. The exact tariff rates are expected to be determined in the coming weeks, potentially allowing room for negotiations or prolonging economic uncertainty.

The political risks associated with tariffs could prove detrimental to Trump if they contribute to inflation and slow economic growth. This move represents a high-stakes gamble for a president eager to assert control over the U.S. economy. The tariff increases will be tailored to individual countries, partly to initiate new trade talks. However, these nations may retaliate with tariffs on American goods, adding to economic instability. To mitigate the fallout, Trump may need to reassure consumers and businesses about the potential benefits of his policy.

While the United States generally maintains low average tariffs, Trump’s proclamation appears to focus more on increasing import taxes than ensuring fairness, according to Scott Lincicome, a trade expert at the libertarian think tank Cato Institute.

“It will inevitably mean higher tariffs, and thus higher taxes for American consumers and manufacturers,” Lincicome stated, adding that Trump’s trade strategy “reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how the global economy works.”

Trump’s plan considers value-added taxes—common in the European Union and similar to sales taxes—as trade barriers that should be accounted for in reciprocal tariff calculations. The administration will also examine foreign tariff rates, industrial subsidies, regulatory constraints, and currency devaluations when determining the new U.S. tariff rates.

A senior White House official, speaking anonymously to reporters, indicated that the anticipated tariff revenues would help offset the projected $1.9 trillion budget deficit. The official also noted that the necessary reviews could be completed in weeks or months.

The proposed increases in taxes on imports and exports could be significant, especially when compared to the relatively moderate tariffs Trump imposed during his first term. Trade between the U.S. and Europe amounted to approximately $1.3 trillion last year, with the U.S. running a $267 billion trade deficit, according to Census Bureau data.

Trump has recently escalated tensions with multiple trading partners, issuing tariff threats and prompting potential retaliation that could push the economy into a trade war.

He has already imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese imports, citing China’s role in opioid fentanyl production. In addition, he has prepared tariffs on Canada and Mexico, the United States’ largest trading partners, which could take effect in March following a 30-day suspension. On Monday, Trump removed exemptions from the steel and aluminum tariffs introduced in 2018. He has also suggested new tariffs on computer chips and pharmaceutical drugs.

However, Trump acknowledged that these sector-specific tariffs, imposed for national security and other reasons, would be separate from the reciprocal tariff plan, meaning that U.S. trading partners might still face additional barriers.

Regarding the 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum, Trump clarified, “That’s over and above this.” He added that automobiles, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals would also be subject to tariffs exceeding those set under the reciprocal tariff framework.

Key U.S. trading partners, including the European Union, Canada, and Mexico, are preparing countermeasures to respond to Trump’s policies, potentially harming the U.S. economy. Meanwhile, China has already retaliated by imposing tariffs on American energy, agricultural machinery, and large-engine automobiles. Additionally, Chinese regulators have launched an antitrust investigation into Google.

The White House has defended its tariff strategy, arguing that imposing equal import taxes as other nations would enhance trade fairness while generating revenue for the U.S. government. Additionally, the administration claims that reciprocal tariffs could serve as a bargaining tool in future trade negotiations.

Trump’s approach, however, also relies on the assumption that voters will tolerate a rise in inflation. Inflation spikes in 2021 and 2022 severely weakened the approval ratings of then-President Joe Biden, as the rising cost of living frustrated voters. This discontent ultimately contributed to Trump’s return to the White House, as many voters believed he could better manage economic challenges.

Since Trump’s election in November, inflation has continued to rise, with the latest government report showing that the consumer price index is increasing at an annual rate of 3%.

The Trump administration has dismissed criticisms of its tariff strategy, even while acknowledging the likelihood of some economic pain. Officials argue that the benefits of extending and expanding Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, coupled with regulatory rollbacks and cost-cutting measures under billionaire adviser Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency initiative, would outweigh any short-term economic hardship.

However, the effectiveness of this approach may depend on the sequencing of Trump’s policies. A prolonged trade conflict could deter investment and hiring, exacerbating inflationary pressures.

A Wells Fargo report released Thursday suggested that Trump’s tariffs would likely hinder economic growth in the near term. However, the report also indicated that an extension of Trump’s tax cuts could stimulate growth in 2026, offering a potential long-term benefit.

Trump has downplayed concerns about inflation, insisting that his policies would have only a minor impact on prices. When asked whether he would direct agencies to analyze the potential effects of his tariffs on consumer prices, the president declined.

“There’s nothing to study,” Trump said. “It’s going to go well.”

Modi’s U.S. Visit to Test His Relationship with Trump Amid Tariff Concerns

Staff ReporterWorld 0

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s established camaraderie with President Donald Trump faces a significant test as he begins his visit to Washington on Wednesday. Modi is keen to ensure India avoids tariffs that have been imposed on other nations and to mitigate the risk of additional taxes on Indian imports.

India, recognized as a crucial strategic ally of the United States, has not yet been subjected to any new tariffs. The two leaders have nurtured a personal bond, with Modi—often criticized for India’s democratic decline—welcoming Trump’s return to the White House. Modi aims to recalibrate India’s relationship with the West, especially in light of his refusal to denounce Russia for its invasion of Ukraine.

Despite this relationship, Trump has frequently labeled India as a “tariff king” and pushed for the South Asian nation to facilitate the deportation of migrants. In response, India has shown openness to lowering tariffs on American goods, accepting the return of Indian citizens, and increasing its purchase of U.S. oil.

However, with tariff threats still looming, the crucial question remains: How much does personal rapport between the two leaders matter, and how far is India willing to go to reach a trade agreement?

Scrutiny on Body Language

During Trump’s first term, Modi built a strong working relationship with the U.S. president. The two leaders can capitalize on areas of alignment and “minimize areas of friction without conceding on core areas of national interest,” stated Meera Shankar, India’s former ambassador to the U.S.

“Most other partners have their reciprocal lists ready from the word go, because it’s a point of leverage when you negotiate,” Shankar explained, expressing optimism that India “will find the right balance between firmness and flexibility” when dealing with tariffs.

Modi, strengthened by his Hindu nationalist party’s victory in last weekend’s crucial state legislature election in India’s federal territory, including New Delhi, described the visit as an “opportunity to build upon” past collaboration and “deepen our partnership” in sectors such as technology, trade, defense, and energy.

Trump’s Expectations

During a conversation with Modi in January, Trump underscored the need for India to increase purchases of U.S.-made military equipment and weapons, as well as reduce the trade deficit. In 2023, the United States imported $50 billion more in goods from India than it exported.

According to a White House readout at the time, Trump “emphasized the importance of India increasing its procurement of American-made security equipment and moving toward a fair bilateral trading relationship.”

Earlier this month, India complied with a U.S. request to accept the return of 104 migrants on a military plane, marking the first such repatriation flight under a crackdown ordered by the Trump administration.

Additionally, Modi’s government has lowered certain high tariffs, including reducing duties on some Harley-Davidson motorcycles from 50% to 40%. In 2023, India also lifted retaliatory tariffs on American almonds, apples, chickpeas, lentils, and walnuts.

“Another thing we can expect is that Modi would offer to purchase more American (natural) gas to narrow the U.S. trade deficit,” said Lisa Curtis, director of the Indo-Pacific security program at the Washington-based Center for a New American Security. “This will help a little bit.”

Concerns Regarding China

India plays a pivotal role in the U.S. strategy to counterbalance China in the Indo-Pacific region. Later this year, it is set to host a summit of the Quad alliance, which includes the U.S., India, Japan, and Australia.

However, India might have to reassess its position if Trump’s administration pursues a diplomatic thaw with China.

“Trump’s outreach to China will complicate India’s ability to cultivate the American desire to use India as a proxy against China without actually ever becoming one,” noted Happymon Jacob, founder of the New Delhi-based Council for Strategic and Defense Research.

India recently took steps to improve ties with China. In December, both countries agreed to work toward resolving their longstanding border dispute in the Himalayas, which had led to a deadly military clash in 2020.

“Even a tactical accommodation between the U.S. and China has implications for India,” Shankar remarked.

Potential Defense Agreements

The United States remains India’s largest trading partner, with a trade imbalance of $50 billion in favor of India. The total Indo-U.S. trade in goods and services reached approximately $190.1 billion in 2023. According to India’s External Affairs Ministry, U.S. exports to India were valued at nearly $70 billion, while Indian exports to the U.S. stood at $120 billion.

India remains heavily reliant on Russia for military supplies, with about 60% of its defense equipment sourced from Moscow. However, uncertainties surrounding the Ukraine war have pushed New Delhi to explore alternative suppliers, including the U.S., Israel, and Britain.

A recent deal will enable U.S.-based General Electric to collaborate with Hindustan Aeronautics in manufacturing jet engines for Indian fighter aircraft. Additionally, India has agreed to purchase U.S.-made MQ-9B SeaGuardian armed drones.

Since 2008, India has signed contracts for over $20 billion worth of American defense equipment.

“For India, that could also be an area where we see some synergies with the U.S.,” Shankar stated, adding that Trump is expected to encourage further defense procurements by India.

Raja Mohan, an analyst at the Institute of South Asian Studies in Singapore, views Modi’s visit as a crucial moment to advance Indo-U.S. ties.

“India’s diplomatic skills will be tested, so the general goodwill that exists between Trump and Modi should be translated into concrete outcomes,” Mohan emphasized.

Senate Confirms Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence in Partisan Vote

Staff ReporterUSA 0

The Senate confirmed Tulsi Gabbard as the director of national intelligence in a largely party-line vote on Wednesday, overcoming strong objections from Democrats and initial concerns from Republicans regarding her qualifications and past statements. The 52-48 vote concluded two months of deliberations on whether the former Hawaii congresswoman was suited to lead the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies and brief President Trump daily on security matters.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was the sole Republican to vote against Gabbard’s confirmation. Some Republican senators had initially questioned her stance on intelligence-gathering practices, particularly her past opposition to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). While serving in the House, Gabbard had pushed for repealing the law, which grants broad surveillance authority. Additionally, concerns arose over her past remarks about Syrian leader Bashar Assad and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

During confirmation hearings, both Democratic and Republican senators pressed Gabbard on whether she viewed former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden as a traitor. Snowden had stolen 1.5 million classified documents, an act that frustrated many lawmakers. Despite repeated questioning, Gabbard declined to label him a traitor, which further frustrated Republicans.

Republican senators also noted that Gabbard struggled to articulate clear answers in private meetings. Senator Susan Collins was among those initially doubtful, questioning whether Gabbard had genuinely embraced the surveillance powers under Section 702, which provides roughly 60% of the intelligence included in the president’s daily brief.

However, Republicans eventually united behind Gabbard after Vice President J.D. Vance played a key role in swaying support. Vance worked closely with Senator Todd Young, a former Marine intelligence officer, to ease GOP concerns. Additionally, Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Tom Cotton remained a steadfast supporter of Gabbard’s nomination, strengthening Republican backing.

Supporters of Gabbard argue that she represents the kind of “disruptor” Trump seeks in leadership roles. They compare her to Pete Hegseth, the recently confirmed Pentagon chief, and claim that she will overhaul the intelligence community, which they believe has been “weaponized” against Trump. Many Trump allies continue to cite a controversial 2020 letter signed by 51 former intelligence officials, which suggested that reports about Hunter Biden’s laptop could be a “Russian influence operation.”

Vance was instrumental in ensuring Young’s support, holding multiple discussions with him between Gabbard’s turbulent confirmation hearing and the committee vote. The Senate Intelligence Committee ultimately advanced her nomination with full Republican support, leading to a procedural vote on Monday where all Republicans present voted in favor of moving toward final confirmation.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune praised Gabbard as a “patriot, motivated by service,” highlighting her extensive background. “Tulsi Gabbard has worn the uniform of our country for the last 22 years, leading American soldiers in some of the most dangerous parts of the world,” Thune stated. He also emphasized her eight years in Congress, where she served on the House Homeland Security, Foreign Affairs, and Armed Services committees.

Democrats, however, strongly opposed her appointment, arguing that she lacked the necessary experience and had displayed poor judgment on critical intelligence matters. They pointed to her skepticism of U.S. intelligence findings on Assad’s use of chemical weapons and her alignment with Putin’s reasoning for invading Ukraine.

“By any objective measure and by every objective measure as well, she is not qualified,” said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer. “From the moment she was nominated, both Democrats and Republicans were puzzled by the choice.”

Schumer criticized Trump’s selection, stating, “Of all people Donald Trump could have picked to oversee national intelligence, he picked someone known for repeating Russian propaganda and getting duped by conspiracy theories.” He went on to claim that if the vote had been conducted by secret ballot, Gabbard would have received no more than 10 votes.

Senator Mark Warner, the vice chair of the Intelligence Committee, was also outspoken in his opposition. He argued that Gabbard had “demonstrated she’s not up to the task” of representing the intelligence community, citing her defense of Assad’s claim that he had not used chemical weapons, despite U.S. intelligence reports stating otherwise.

Warner further contended that Gabbard had “knowingly met with the Syrian cleric who threatened to conduct serial bomb attacks against the United States” and had unfairly blamed the U.S. and NATO for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. He pointed to her past assertions that the Biden administration had failed to acknowledge Putin’s concerns about Ukraine joining NATO.

Republican senators faced considerable pressure to support Trump’s controversial nominees, including Gabbard, Hegseth, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose confirmation vote for Secretary of Health and Human Services is set for later this week.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse was among the most vocal critics of Gabbard’s appointment, characterizing it as “part of a pattern of unilateral disarmament by the Trump administration against Russia.”

Citing a Washington Post article from November, Whitehouse noted that “Gabbard’s appointment as head of national intelligence elicited the most excitement in Russia because she has long been regarded as a darling of the propagandist Russian R.T. network.”

“Russian TV has called Ms. Gabbard ‘our friend Tulsi,’” Whitehouse said. “[A] Russian newspaper published an op-ed, and it was titled, ‘The CIA and FBI are trembling [that] Trump protégé Tulsi Gabbard will support Russia.’”

Despite these objections, Gabbard’s confirmation received strong backing from Republican leadership. Tom Cotton, a key figure on national security within the GOP, defended her against accusations of disloyalty.

“Let me remind everyone that Ms. Gabbard has served in our Army for more than two decades, she has multiple combat tours, and she still wears the uniform today,” Cotton stated. “She has undergone five FBI background checks.”

One of the primary hurdles Gabbard faced during her confirmation was her prior advocacy for repealing Section 702 of FISA. In the past, she criticized the law as an “overreach” that infringed on civil liberties. However, in private meetings with Republican senators, she clarified that her stance had evolved due to recent reforms to the program.

Senator James Lankford, a member of the Intelligence Committee, revealed that he decided to back Gabbard after she reassured him that she now supported Section 702, describing it as a “vital” tool for national security.

Lankford noted in an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press” that Gabbard had convinced him she would uphold the surveillance authority, which played a crucial role in securing Republican votes for her confirmation.

Ultimately, Gabbard’s path to confirmation reflected the deep divisions in the Senate, with Republicans rallying behind Trump’s pick despite lingering concerns, while Democrats staunchly opposed her, citing her past positions and perceived sympathies toward Russia and Assad.

Indian Students in the US Fear Tightening of OPT Program Amid Political Scrutiny

Staff ReporterEducation 0

Indian students and professionals in the United States are growing increasingly concerned about the potential tightening of the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, which serves as a crucial avenue for gaining work experience and transitioning to H-1B visas. Ongoing political debates have led to criticisms that the program is unfair to American workers, leaving thousands of Indian students uncertain about their career prospects.

The Optional Practical Training (OPT) and Curricular Practical Training (CPT) programs have long played an essential role for international students on F-1 visas, providing opportunities for work experience. During the 2022-2023 academic year, around 69,000 Indian students participated in the OPT program. However, recent policy discussions and the legacy of former President Donald Trump’s stricter immigration stance have put the future of these programs at risk.

Understanding OPT and CPT

OPT permits students to work in the U.S. either before or after graduation, granting 12 months of work authorization. Those in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields can apply for a 24-month extension, bringing their total work authorization period to 36 months.

CPT, on the other hand, is tailored for work experiences that are directly tied to a student’s coursework. It allows part-time or full-time employment but comes with a critical restriction—students who complete more than 12 months of full-time CPT become ineligible for OPT.

Both programs require formal approval. While universities oversee the initial process through their Designated School Officials (DSOs), OPT participants must also secure authorization from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

Increased Scrutiny on OPT and CPT

During a U.S. House Judiciary Committee hearing on January 22, 2025, Jessica M. Vaughan, Director of Policy Studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, criticized both OPT and CPT, claiming they lack congressional authorization and are exploited by diploma mills that issue fraudulent work permits. “They should be eliminated or much more closely regulated,” Vaughan stated, emphasizing that these programs have contributed to the growth of the largest guest worker population in the U.S., with approximately 540,000 former students working under minimal oversight.

Concerns over the impact on American workers have also driven legal challenges. In 2022, the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers (WashTech) filed a lawsuit arguing that OPT enables employers to sidestep the H-1B visa cap, ultimately disadvantaging U.S. workers.

Adding to the scrutiny, instances of fraud and security risks have heightened calls for reform. In 2016, U.S. authorities created the fictitious University of Northern New Jersey to expose fraudulent CPT users. Jon Feere, former chief of staff at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), has since highlighted multiple concerns regarding the program’s oversight.

The Issue of No Cap on OPT

The sheer scale of participation in these programs is noteworthy. In the fiscal year 2023, 539,382 foreign students were employed under OPT, STEM OPT, and CPT combined. Unlike the H-1B visa program, which is subject to an annual cap, these programs have no numerical limitations. The breakdown includes 276,452 students under OPT, 122,101 under STEM OPT, and 140,829 under CPT.

Proposed policy changes aim to introduce stricter regulations. Vaughan has suggested implementing stronger oversight on educational institutions that issue visa paperwork, advocating for the revocation of certifications for schools with high student overstay rates. Feere has proposed limiting OPT to fields where practical training is essential for all students, not just international ones, ensuring that the program maintains its educational purpose rather than turning into a source of inexpensive labor.

Pushback from Universities and Tech Industry

Universities have resisted these potential restrictions, arguing that OPT is crucial for attracting international students, who collectively contribute billions of dollars to the U.S. economy. Institutions such as the University of California, Berkeley, actively support OPT as a valuable tool for students to gain real-world experience, enhancing their professional development.

Additionally, leading technology companies—including Google, Microsoft, and Amazon—rely heavily on the OPT program to recruit international talent for roles in software engineering, data science, and product management. These companies value the diverse skill sets and perspectives that international students bring to the workforce, further reinforcing the argument for maintaining the program.

With the future of OPT and CPT under increasing political scrutiny, Indian students in the U.S. are left in a state of uncertainty, hoping that policy decisions will continue to support their career aspirations while addressing broader economic and workforce concerns.

Pope Francis Condemns U.S. Deportation Plans, Warns of Consequences

Staff ReporterWorld 0

Pope Francis issued a strong criticism on Tuesday regarding the Trump administration’s mass deportation plans, cautioning that expelling individuals solely based on their illegal status strips them of their dignity and will have dire consequences.

In an unprecedented move, Francis directly addressed the U.S. crackdown on migrants through a letter to American bishops, appearing to challenge Vice President JD Vance’s theological defense of the deportation strategy.

U.S. border czar Tom Homan promptly dismissed the pope’s comments, pointing out that the Vatican is a city-state enclosed by walls and arguing that border security should remain under his jurisdiction.

As the first Latin American pontiff, Francis has long prioritized the rights and welfare of migrants, frequently citing biblical teachings that emphasize welcoming strangers. He has called on nations to provide protection, integration, and support to those fleeing violence, poverty, and environmental crises, though he acknowledges that governments must operate within their means.

Tensions between the Argentine Jesuit and President Donald Trump on immigration matters date back to Trump’s first campaign. In 2016, Francis famously declared that anyone who builds walls to keep migrants out was “not a Christian.”

In his letter, Francis acknowledged the right of countries to ensure security and safeguard their communities from criminal threats.

“That said, the act of deporting people who in many cases have left their own land for reasons of extreme poverty, insecurity, exploitation, persecution or serious deterioration of the environment, damages the dignity of many men and women, and of entire families, and places them in a state of particular vulnerability and defenselessness,” he wrote.

Referencing the Book of Exodus and Jesus Christ’s own experiences, Francis defended the right of people to seek safety in other countries. He described the deportation plan as a “major crisis” unfolding in the United States.

He urged Christians to critically assess policies that conflate undocumented status with criminal behavior.

“Anyone schooled in Christianity cannot fail to make a critical judgment and express its disagreement with any measure that tacitly or explicitly identifies the illegal status of some migrants with criminality,” he said.

Francis further warned that policies rooted in force rather than fundamental human dignity are doomed to fail.

“What is built on the basis of force, and not on the truth about the equal dignity of every human being, begins badly and will end badly,” he cautioned.

Archbishop Timothy Broglio, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, expressed gratitude for the pope’s message in his response.

“With you, we pray that the U.S. government keep its prior commitments to help those in desperate need,” Broglio wrote. “Boldly I ask for your continued prayers so that we may find the courage as a nation to build a more humane system of immigration, one that protects our communities while safeguarding the dignity of all.”

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt reported last week that over 8,000 people had been arrested in immigration raids since Trump’s inauguration on January 20. Some individuals have already been deported, while others remain in federal custody, including at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba.

Vance, a Catholic convert, has defended the administration’s hardline immigration approach by invoking the medieval Catholic concept of “ordo amoris,” which describes a hierarchy of love—placing family first, followed by neighbors, local communities, and then the broader world.

Francis appeared to challenge Vance’s interpretation in his letter.

“Christian love is not a concentric expansion of interests that little by little extend to other persons and groups,” he wrote. “The true ordo amoris that must be promoted is that which we discover by meditating constantly on the parable of the ‘Good Samaritan,’ that is, by meditating on the love that builds a fraternity open to all, without exception.”

David Gibson, director of Fordham University’s Center on Religion and Culture, remarked on social media that Francis’ letter directly countered Vance’s theological claims.

“[It] takes aim at every single absurd theological claim by JD Vance and his allies in conservative Catholicism (and the Catholic electorate),” Gibson posted.

Vance’s argument had gained traction among conservative Catholics, including the Catholic League, which backed his interpretation of the hierarchy of Christian love.

In Crisis Magazine, editor Eric Sammons defended Vance’s stance, citing the teachings of St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas.

“For Augustine, every love, even the love of neighbor, must be ordered beneath the love of God,” Sammons wrote. “This hierarchy extends to our human relationships where love for family, community, and nation should precede our love for the world at large, not in intensity but in priority of duty and responsibility.”

Homan, also a Catholic, dismissed the pope’s stance and argued that Francis should focus on Church affairs rather than U.S. border policy.

“He wants to attack us for securing our border. He’s got a wall around the Vatican, does he not?” Homan told reporters in a video posted by The Hill. “So he’s got a wall around that protects his people and himself, but we can’t have a wall around the United States.”

The Vatican, a 44-hectare (108-acre) walled city-state within Rome, has also implemented strict border measures. A law enacted in December imposes prison sentences of up to four years and fines of up to 25,000 euros ($25,873) on those who enter illegally using force, threats, or deception to bypass security.

The U.S. bishops conference had previously criticized Trump’s immigration policies, calling them “deeply troubling” in an unusually strong statement. The bishops warned that measures concerning immigration, foreign aid, capital punishment, and environmental policies would have harmful consequences, especially for vulnerable populations.

This marked a notable rebuke from the Catholic hierarchy in the U.S., which has traditionally prioritized opposition to abortion as a central political concern. Many bishops had previously supported the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision—enabled by Trump-appointed justices—to overturn constitutional protections for abortion.

Despite tensions between the Church and Trump’s policies, Catholic voters helped secure his victory in the 2024 election, giving him 54% of their votes—a notable increase from the 50% he received in 2020 when he ran against President Joe Biden, a fellow Catholic.

Bishop Mark Seitz of El Paso, Texas, who leads the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ migration committee, welcomed the pope’s letter as an important source of support in a challenging climate.

“We are dealing with these very threatening circumstances towards immigrants, towards our immigrant brothers and sisters, and also towards those who assist them in any way,” Seitz stated.

Speaking to The Associated Press, Seitz emphasized that while it’s important to acknowledge the concerns of Americans, including Catholic Trump supporters, regarding immigration, Church leaders must continue to uphold its teachings.

“But we have to just steadfastly announce the truth as best we understand it, both in terms of the teaching of the church and the reality on the ground,” he added.

Trump Adviser Criticizes India’s High Tariffs, Suggests Reciprocal Trade Measures

Staff ReporterNews 0

India imposes “enormously high” tariffs that restrict imports, U.S. President Donald Trump’s chief economic adviser Kevin Hassett stated on Monday. He added that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi would have significant trade discussions with Trump in their upcoming meeting.

During an interview with CNBC, Hassett emphasized that Trump advocates for reciprocal tariffs, ensuring that U.S. duties match those imposed by other nations. “If they go down, we’ll go down,” he remarked, indicating that the U.S. would reduce tariffs if other countries lowered theirs.

Hassett pointed out that most U.S. trade partners maintain tariffs significantly higher than those of the United States. He noted that while Canada, Mexico, and Britain have similar tariff structures, many other countries impose much steeper trade barriers.

Earlier on Monday, Reuters reported that Modi was preparing to introduce further tariff reductions ahead of his two-day visit to Washington, beginning Wednesday.

Meanwhile, Trump plans to announce new 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports into the U.S. on Monday. These will be in addition to the existing duties on metals. Reciprocal tariffs are expected to be announced on Tuesday or Wednesday, with implementation set to follow almost immediately.

Trump has previously criticized India’s trade policies, describing the country as a “very big abuser” in global trade. He has also urged India to increase its purchases of American-made security equipment to establish a more balanced trade relationship.

In response, India is evaluating potential tariff reductions across at least a dozen sectors, including electronics, medical equipment, and chemicals. According to three government officials, these reductions aim to facilitate U.S. exports while aligning with New Delhi’s domestic production strategies.

Trump Reverses Federal Push Against Plastic Straws, Reigniting Environmental Debate

Staff ReporterEnvironment 0

Straws might seem trivial, often sparking humor in discussions about plastic versus paper alternatives, but plastic straws have become emblematic of a global pollution crisis in the past decade.

On Monday, former President Donald Trump reignited the controversy by signing an executive order reversing federal efforts to phase out plastic straws. Defending the use of plastic over paper, Trump asserted that paper straws “don’t work” and lack durability. He further stated, “It’s OK” to continue using plastic straws, despite concerns that they contribute to ocean pollution and endanger marine life.

The debate over plastic straws gained widespread attention in 2015 when a video surfaced of a marine biologist extracting a plastic straw from a turtle’s nose, sparking global outrage. This led to a wave of bans, beginning with Vanuatu, a Pacific Island nation, and Seattle in 2018.

The Fate of Plastic Straws

According to the Turtle Island Restoration Network, over 390 million plastic straws are used daily in the United States, typically for no more than 30 minutes before being discarded. These straws often end up littering beaches and waterways, posing a threat to marine animals that may ingest them, mistaking them for food.

Due to their small size, plastic straws are not recyclable and can take at least 200 years to decompose, according to the advocacy group. As they degrade, they break down into microplastics—fragments tinier than a grain of rice—that have been detected in various human body tissues. Although research remains limited, increasing concerns suggest that microplastics in the body might be linked to heart disease, Alzheimer’s, dementia, and other health issues.

Trump’s executive order argued that paper straws contain chemicals that could pose health risks and are more costly to produce than plastic alternatives. A 2023 study from the University of Antwerp found that “forever chemicals” known as PFAS were present in paper, bamboo, glass, and plastic straws but not in stainless steel ones.

Despite the cost argument, Beyond Plastics, an environmental advocacy group, contends that skipping straws altogether is the most economical and sustainable choice.

Judith Enck, a former Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional administrator and current president of Beyond Plastics, expressed concern over the executive order. She encouraged individuals and local governments to push back against the decision by actively reducing their use of plastic straws.

“It’s easy to just kind of almost poke fun of this, ignore it,” Enck remarked on Tuesday. “But this is a moment that we as individuals and state and local policymakers can make a statement that they disagree with this executive order and are committed to using less plastic straws. It’s not that hard to do.”

Across the country, several states and cities have already imposed bans on plastic straws, while some restaurants have opted to stop automatically providing them to customers.

Global Efforts Against Plastic Waste

Under President Joe Biden, the administration had committed to eliminating single-use plastics—including plastic straws—from federal food service operations, events, and packaging by 2027, with a complete phase-out from all federal operations by 2035.

This initiative signaled formal acknowledgment from the federal government of the severity of plastic pollution and the level of response necessary to combat the crisis effectively.

Erin Simon, a plastics and packaging expert at the World Wildlife Fund, emphasized the significance of this effort, stating that it sent a global message: “If we can make change happen at scale, so can you.”

The Biden administration’s pledge came in July, just months before international negotiators convened in South Korea to draft a treaty aimed at addressing plastic pollution on a global scale. While the negotiations did not yield a final agreement last year, discussions are set to resume this year.

Initially, the U.S. under Biden took a position that was perceived as industry-friendly, advocating for individual countries to create their own plastic management plans rather than adopting global regulations. China, the U.S., and Germany dominate the global plastics trade, making their stances particularly influential in shaping international policy.

However, ahead of the South Korea talks, the U.S. revised its stance, voicing support for including provisions in the treaty that would regulate plastic production. More than 100 nations back a robust agreement that not only limits plastic production but also promotes cleanup efforts and enhances recycling systems.

With Trump’s return to the political spotlight, U.S. manufacturers have urged him to remain engaged in negotiations while reverting to the previous industry-focused approach, which emphasized redesigning plastic products, expanding recycling efforts, and promoting reuse rather than outright reduction of plastic production.

The Broader Plastic Pollution Crisis

Plastic straws represent only a fraction of the larger environmental issue posed by single-use plastics. Items such as water bottles, takeout containers, coffee lids, and shopping bags contribute significantly to plastic pollution.

The United Nations reports that over 400 million tons of new plastic are produced annually, with approximately 40% used for packaging.

According to Ocean Conservancy, in 2023 alone, volunteers collected over 61,000 plastic straws and stirrers from polluted beaches and waterways across the United States. However, plastic straws were far from the most prevalent waste—cigarette butts, plastic bottles, bottle caps, and food wrappers were collected in even greater numbers.

Most plastics are derived from fossil fuels, and their production remains closely tied to the oil and gas industry. During the United Nations’ COP28 climate talks in 2023, negotiators reached an agreement emphasizing the global need to transition away from fossil fuels and triple renewable energy use.

As global efforts to curtail fossil fuel consumption intensify, oil and gas companies have increasingly looked to the plastics sector as a potential growth market. Trump has been a strong advocate of the oil and gas industry and continues to receive significant support from it.

While the debate over plastic straws may seem symbolic, it underscores a larger battle over environmental policy, corporate interests, and the future of plastic consumption worldwide.

Top Ten Teams Announced for 2025 South Asian Showdown in Boston

Staff ReporterEntertainment 0

The South Asian Showdown has officially revealed the ten teams that will compete in this year’s highly anticipated Bollywood Fusion dance competition. Recognized as one of the largest and most prestigious Bollywood Fusion events in North America, the competition draws some of the finest dance teams from across the United States and Canada.

Participants will perform intricate, professionally choreographed routines in vibrant costumes as they compete for the grand prize of $5,000. The event is scheduled for Saturday, March 1, 2025, at the Strand Theatre in Boston. Tickets are currently available at www.southasianshowdown.com.

“This year we had more than 50 teams apply from across North America,” said Rohit Bhambi, founder of the South Asian Showdown. “We have selected the top ten teams that will be joining us in Boston from as far away as L.A. and Vancouver to see who is the best. The audience will get to see some of the best Bollywood/Fusion that North America has to offer as each region brings their own style to the competition.”

Bollywood Fusion, a highly energetic dance style originating from India, blends various dance forms into a cohesive theme. Attendees can expect to witness an exciting mix of Bollywood, Hip-Hop, Bhangra, Classical, Contemporary, Tollywood, and more.

The 2025 Competitors

BU Chankaar (Boston, MA)

BU Chankaar, Boston University’s premier all-female fusion dance team, showcases an array of dance styles, including Bollywood, Bhangra, Hip-Hop, and Classical. Their performances aim to represent South Asian culture within the Boston community. The group is dedicated to maintaining its legacy by channeling creativity, energy, and passion into each performance.

MIT Mirchi (Boston, MA)

Founded in 2012, MIT Mirchi is the university’s competitive Bollywood-Fusion dance team. They embody a love for dance, blending South Asian and Western influences into dynamic performances. Mirchi has proudly represented MIT and the greater Boston area at competitions across the country. Known for their fiery stage presence, they strive to captivate audiences with every performance.

Desi Dhamaka (Tampa, FL)

Desi Dhamaka is a co-ed independent Bollywood Fusion team based in Tampa, Florida. Their performances are known for vibrant choreography and compelling storytelling. The team fosters a supportive and inspiring environment, encouraging its members to grow and flourish in their dance journey.

Miami UJhoom (Miami, FL)

Since its inception in 2013, Miami UJhoom has been setting stages ablaze with its energetic performances. The name “UJhoom” derives from the Hindi phrase “Jhoom Barabar Jhoom”, meaning to dance and celebrate without restrictions or fear. The team, consisting of dancers from diverse backgrounds, integrates multiple styles such as Bollywood, Bhangra, Contemporary, Hip-Hop, and Classical, creating a unique fusion experience.

NYU Dillagi (New York, NY)

NYU Dillagi, New York University’s only co-ed Bollywood Fusion dance team, is well-known for seamlessly merging Eastern and Western dance styles. The team takes pride in showcasing diverse backgrounds and storytelling abilities. They are excited to participate in this year’s competition, presenting a performance that reflects their unity, dedication, and passion for dance.

UBC Junoon (Vancouver, BC)

UBC Junoon, traveling from Vancouver, represents Canada as the only internationally competitive Bollywood dance team at the event. Driven by a deep passion for Bollywood Fusion, they promise an electrifying performance. Their choreography, infused with vibrant energy and powerful storytelling, is designed to captivate and leave a lasting impression on the audience.

UCI Zamana (Irvine, CA)

Zamana, the University of California, Irvine’s premier Bollywood Fusion competitive team, blends multiple dance forms such as Hip-Hop, Bhangra, Kuthu, Contemporary, and Classical into its Bollywood foundation. Founded in 2009, Zamana has been a consistent presence at prestigious dance events nationwide. The team has even been invited to audition for America’s Got Talent.

UConn Surya (Storrs, CT)

Established in 2004, UConn Surya is Connecticut’s leading competitive Bollywood Fusion dance team. Over the years, it has evolved into a nationally recognized team that integrates a variety of dance styles, including Bollywood, Classical, Lyrical, Hip-Hop, and Bhangra.

USC Zeher (Los Angeles, CA)

USC Zeher, a nationally acclaimed Bollywood Fusion dance team, represents Los Angeles with its award-winning performances. Their goal is to bring the essence of Bollywood Fusion to the collegiate stage through creativity and dedication. Known for their commitment to authenticity, Zeher aims to deliver performances that are both captivating and inspiring.

WashU Chaahat (St. Louis, MO)

WashU Chaahat is a student-run competitive dance team from Washington University in St. Louis. The team participates in various on- and off-campus events, including WashU’s renowned Diwali celebration. As part of an intercollegiate dance circuit, Chaahat competes at national-level events. Their performances feature an array of styles, including Bollywood, Kuthu, Hip-Hop, Contemporary, Bharatanatyam, Raas, and Garba.

Cultural Impact and Support

The South Asian Showdown is organized by Boston Bhangra and South Asian Nation, two local nonprofit organizations dedicated to promoting cultural awareness. The event receives significant support from institutions such as the Barr Foundation, the Mass Cultural Council, the Mayor’s Office of Arts and Culture, and Chardikla TV.

The 2025 South Asian Showdown is set to take place on March 1 at the Strand Theatre, located at 543 Columbia Rd, Boston, MA. Tickets are currently available for purchase.

Kerala Sees 21% Rise in Tourist Arrivals, Launches K-Homes Project to Boost Hospitality

Staff ReporterTourism 0

Kerala welcomed 2,22,46,989 tourists in 2024, marking a significant 21% increase from pre-pandemic levels, Minister for Tourism and Public Works P. A. Mohamed Riyas informed the State Assembly on Wednesday.

“This huge upsurge in tourist arrivals shows that in the last couple of years, the state has been erasing its previous record in arrival of tourists,” Riyas stated.

Discussing the newly launched K-Homes project, which was introduced in the 2025-26 state budget to expand accommodation options for visitors by utilizing unoccupied homes near major destinations, Riyas said the initiative will initially be implemented in Kovalam, Kumarakom, Munnar, and Fort Kochi.

“The K-Homes project will take the growth of tourism to new heights, as it offers the tourists a comfortable stay and a hands-on feel of local culture and cuisine. Special arrangements will be made for the implementation of the K-Homes project including online booking of stays,” said Riyas, who is also the son-in-law of Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan.

This initiative is expected to enhance Kerala’s hospitality industry, with implementation planned within a 10-km radius of selected locations. Additionally, the state has formulated a program aimed at bringing women stakeholders in the tourism sector under a single platform as part of efforts to promote women-friendly tourism.

“So far, 17,631 women have registered under the project through the Responsible Tourism Mission Society. They include tour operators, homestay owners, drivers, and other tourism entrepreneurs,” Riyas noted.

Farm Tourism has also been identified as a key area for further development. The Responsible Tourism Mission Society has provided training to 952 units, with 452 units showing strong performance. Of these, 103 units have been listed on the RT Mission’s website.

Riyas highlighted that Kerala’s Design Policy has been utilized to ensure that tourist destinations remain both environmentally sustainable and aesthetically appealing.

Another major initiative that aims to boost the tourism sector is the Destination Challenge project, which is focused on highlighting lesser-known destinations and is being carried out in collaboration with Local Self-Government Institutions.

“So far, 40 such spots have been identified,” Riyas stated.

Additionally, campus-based Tourism Clubs have been engaged in the development, maintenance, and promotion of tourist destinations in their respective regions. A scheme has also been introduced to train students as tourism guides, equipping them with multilingual proficiency.

“Local Youth Tourism Clubs have been formed across the state, with the participation of local service providers like taxi and autorickshaw drivers,” Riyas added.

Trump Meets Jordan’s King Abdullah, Reiterates Plan to Clear Gaza for Redevelopment

Staff ReporterWorld 0

President Donald Trump welcomed Jordan’s King Abdullah II to the White House on Tuesday, once again pushing his controversial idea of evacuating Gaza’s population, placing it under U.S. control, and transforming it into a tourist destination.

This ambitious but highly improbable proposal to reshape the Middle East would require Jordan and other Arab nations to take in displaced Gazans. However, after their meeting, Abdullah reaffirmed his opposition to such a move.

Their discussion took place in the Oval Office, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio also present. Although Trump had previously suggested withholding U.S. aid from Jordan or Egypt if they refused to accept more people from Gaza, he appeared to backtrack on that stance.

“I don’t have to threaten that. I do believe we’re above that,” Trump stated. This contradicted his earlier remarks, where he had implied that reducing U.S. assistance was a possibility.

When asked multiple times about Trump’s plan to empty Gaza and convert it into a Mediterranean resort, Abdullah refrained from making any concrete remarks or committing to taking in large numbers of displaced Gazans.

However, the Jordanian leader did express his country’s willingness to accept up to 2,000 ill or cancer-stricken children from Gaza “right away.”

“I finally see somebody that can take us across the finish line to bring stability, peace and prosperity to all of us in the region,” Abdullah remarked, referring to Trump during their meeting.

After spending about two hours at the White House, Abdullah proceeded to Capitol Hill for discussions with a bipartisan group of lawmakers. Later, he posted on X, stating, “I reiterated Jordan’s steadfast position against the displacement of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.”

“This is the unified Arab position. Rebuilding Gaza without displacing the Palestinians and addressing the dire humanitarian situation should be the priority for all,” he wrote.

Despite Abdullah’s firm stance, Trump used the meeting to once again suggest that the U.S. could assume control of Gaza. He claimed this wouldn’t require American financial contributions but insisted that placing the region under “U.S. authority” was feasible, though he did not elaborate on what that would entail.

“We’re not going to buy anything. We’re going to have it,” Trump said regarding U.S. control in Gaza. He envisioned constructing new hotels, office buildings, and residences, promising that the region would be “exciting.”

“I can tell you about real estate. They’re going to be in love with it,” Trump added, referencing his background in property development, while also maintaining that he had no personal interest in handling the redevelopment.

Trump has previously suggested that Gaza’s population could be relocated, either temporarily or permanently—an idea that has been met with strong opposition across the Arab world.

The former president also reiterated that a fragile ceasefire between Hamas and Israel could be scrapped if Hamas failed to release all remaining hostages by midday Saturday. He first raised this point on Monday but acknowledged that Israel would ultimately decide on the matter.

“I don’t think they’re going to make the deadline, personally,” Trump commented on Tuesday, referring to Hamas. “They want to play tough guy. We’ll see how tough they are.”

Abdullah’s visit coincided with a critical period for the ceasefire in Gaza. Hamas has accused Israel of breaching the truce and has delayed the release of more hostages captured during its attack on October 7, 2023.

Following Trump’s remarks, Hamas issued a statement calling them “racist” and “a call for ethnic cleansing.” The group also accused the former president of attempting to “liquidate the Palestinian cause and deny the national rights of the Palestinian people.”

Trump has repeatedly proposed that the U.S. should control Gaza and transform it into “the Riviera of the Middle East.” His vision includes relocating Palestinians to neighboring nations without granting them a right of return.

However, his statements on Tuesday contradicted his previous stance on potentially withholding U.S. aid from Jordan and Egypt—two long-standing American allies and top recipients of foreign assistance—if they refused to accept additional Palestinians from Gaza.

Jordan already hosts over 2 million Palestinians, and its government has remained resolute in opposing forced displacement. Last week, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi stated that his country’s stance on Gaza’s population transfer was “firm and unwavering.”

Beyond concerns over jeopardizing the longstanding objective of a two-state solution, both Egypt and Jordan have expressed private security fears about admitting large numbers of displaced Palestinians, even on a temporary basis.

Trump first outlined his plans for relocating Gaza’s residents and asserting U.S. control over the region during a press conference last week alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

At the time, the former president did not rule out deploying American troops to help secure Gaza but simultaneously insisted that no U.S. funds would be allocated for its reconstruction—raising significant questions about how his proposal could be implemented.

Following Trump’s initial remarks, both Secretary of State Marco Rubio and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt sought to clarify that his administration envisioned only a “temporary” relocation of Palestinians from Gaza. They claimed the move would allow for essential tasks such as clearing debris, disposing of unexploded ordnance, and reconstructing the region.

However, when asked in a Fox News interview on Monday whether displaced Palestinians would eventually be permitted to return to Gaza, Trump firmly responded, “No, they wouldn’t.”

Egg Prices Surge Amid Bird Flu Outbreak, Shortages, and Thefts

Staff ReporterUSA 0

Eggs are not only costly due to the ongoing bird flu outbreak but are also becoming increasingly difficult to find. In some areas, stores have even started limiting how many cartons customers can purchase.

The high demand for eggs has led to unusual incidents, including thefts where culprits appear to treat eggs as valuable as gold.

The outbreak remains a persistent issue as the virus continues to mutate, spreading among birds, other animals, and even some humans. Whenever a chicken or turkey contracts the virus, the entire flock is culled to contain the disease.

While egg shortages are not uniform across all regions, predicting when a large poultry farm might be affected is impossible. A single outbreak in a major farm with millions of birds can significantly impact supply.

Consequently, egg prices have soared.

Jose Castillo, co-owner of Norma’s Sweets Bakery in New Orleans, has found it increasingly challenging to maintain affordable prices for Cuban sandwiches and king cakes due to soaring egg costs.

“Oh, it’s hurting man. It’s crazy how expensive eggs are,” Castillo said. “Normally we’ll get them for $35, $40 dollars a case and now we’re paying like $118, $120 dollars.”

Hard to find

Across the country, empty egg shelves have become a frequent sight. Many shoppers must visit multiple stores or turn to local farmers to secure eggs.

The bird flu outbreak, which began in 2022, has significantly impacted the poultry industry. Nearly 158 million birds have been culled, with most being egg-laying hens.

This mass slaughter has diminished egg supplies, pushing prices higher. However, with over 300 million chickens producing eggs nationwide for breakfast and baking, the industry is generally resilient enough to handle the loss of a few million birds without major disruptions.

The issue arises when mass cullings occur. In January alone, more than 23 million birds were slaughtered, following the December loss of 18 million.

Once egg farmers are forced to euthanize their entire flock, it takes at least one to two months before new hens can be introduced. The delay is due to the time required to dispose of carcasses and properly sanitize barns before restocking can occur. As a result, supply issues persist for weeks or even months.

Limiting purchases

In response to the shortage, some retailers have begun rationing egg sales.

Trader Joe’s has enforced a nationwide limit of one carton per customer per day.

“We hope these limits will help to ensure that as many of our customers who need eggs are able to purchase them when they visit Trader Joe’s,” the company said in a statement to The Associated Press on Tuesday.

Other retailers, including Costco, Whole Foods, Kroger, and Aldi, have also implemented varying restrictions. However, not all are imposing national limits.

A Kroger spokesperson confirmed that the supermarket chain has not set company-wide purchase limits. However, some regional divisions and store locations have restricted customers to buying no more than two dozen eggs per visit.

Walmart, meanwhile, has only limited bulk purchases. “Although supply is very tight, we’re working with suppliers to try and help meet customer demand, while striving to keep prices as low as possible,” the Bentonville, Arkansas-based retail giant said in an emailed statement. The company clarified that only 60-count cartons have been capped at two per purchase.

An expensive option

The price of eggs has reached staggering levels. The nationwide average cost per dozen soared to $4.15 in December—more than double the summer 2023 price.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture predicts prices will rise by another 20% this year.

As Easter approaches, demand for eggs is expected to climb due to their traditional role in holiday dishes and Easter egg hunts.

On Wednesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics is set to release updated inflation data, and egg prices are anticipated to have climbed even further. However, they are unlikely to surpass the record-high average of $4.82 per dozen set in January 2023.

These figures only reflect national averages. In some areas, consumers are already paying more than $10 per dozen, particularly for organic or cage-free options.

The impact extends beyond grocery stores, with some restaurants also raising prices. Waffle House, for example, recently announced a 50-cent surcharge per egg on all menu items.

Cracking the case

With eggs commanding such high prices, thefts have become an unexpected consequence.

Seattle police recently investigated the theft of over 500 eggs from a restaurant.

Surveillance footage from Luna Park Cafe in West Seattle captured two men entering a refrigerated storage shed last Wednesday in the early morning hours. The suspects stole approximately 540 eggs, liquid egg products, bacon, ground beef, and blueberries before loading the stolen items into a van. Authorities estimated the value of the stolen breakfast items at around $780.

A larger-scale theft took place earlier this month in Pennsylvania. Approximately 100,000 eggs were stolen from the back of a Pete & Gerry’s Organics distribution trailer in Antrim Township. The theft occurred around 8:40 p.m. on a Saturday night, according to police reports.

The stolen eggs had an estimated value of $40,000.

As bird flu continues to spread, disrupting egg supplies and driving prices higher, consumers and businesses alike are feeling the strain. With no immediate relief in sight, shoppers may have to brace for further price hikes and ongoing shortages.

India to Host Next Global AI Summit After Paris Event

Staff ReporterTechnology 0

India is set to host the next international summit on artificial intelligence after co-hosting the recent event in Paris with France on February 10 and 11, according to French President Emmanuel Macron’s office.

During his address at Paris’s Grand Palais, Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed India’s willingness to take on the responsibility of organizing the upcoming AI summit. “India would be happy to host the next AI summit,” Modi announced, signaling the country’s readiness to lead discussions on AI at the global level.

In his speech, Modi highlighted both the transformative potential and the inherent challenges of artificial intelligence (AI), emphasizing its profound influence on society. “AI is already re-shaping our polity, our economy, our security, and even our society. AI is writing the code for humanity in this century,” he stated, underscoring AI’s far-reaching impact across multiple domains.

Acknowledging the rapid advancements in AI, Modi stressed the importance of international collaboration to establish governance frameworks that uphold shared global values. “There is a need for collective global efforts to establish governance and standards that uphold our shared values, address risks, and build trust,” he said. This call for cooperation reflects growing concerns about ethical AI use and the necessity for common standards.

One of the key concerns Modi addressed was AI’s effect on employment. He acknowledged the apprehension surrounding job displacement but provided a historical perspective to counter such fears. “Loss of jobs is AI’s most feared disruption. But, history has shown that work does not disappear due to technology. Its nature changes and new types of jobs are created,” Modi remarked. He emphasized the need for large-scale investment in skill development and workforce training to equip people for an AI-driven economy.

Sustainability in AI development was another crucial topic Modi highlighted. He stressed the importance of clean energy in supporting AI’s future. “This will require green power to fuel its future,” he stated, drawing attention to the energy demands of AI infrastructure. He noted that India and France were already working together on sustainability initiatives such as the International Solar Alliance, reinforcing the need for AI models that are both energy-efficient and environmentally responsible. Modi further likened AI’s energy efficiency to that of the human brain, advocating for sustainable AI advancements.

Discussing India’s role in AI innovation, Modi detailed the country’s accomplishments in creating a Digital Public Infrastructure that serves 1.4 billion people. He pointed out that India’s investments in AI technology have significantly improved accessibility and affordability in critical sectors. He also highlighted the National AI Mission, which aims to develop AI applications for public welfare. India, he noted, is leading the way in AI adoption while ensuring data privacy solutions remain a priority.

“We are developing AI applications for public good. We have one of the world’s largest AI talent pools. India is building its own Large Language Model considering our diversity,” he said. His remarks reinforced India’s position as a key player in AI innovation while demonstrating its commitment to international cooperation in AI research and development.

The Prime Minister also addressed broader concerns about AI’s future and its implications for human intelligence. While some fear AI surpassing human intelligence, Modi maintained that humans ultimately hold control over technological advancements. “Some people worry about machines becoming superior in intelligence to humans. But, no one holds the key to our collective future and shared destiny other than us humans,” he stated. His remarks underscored the responsibility of humanity in shaping AI’s trajectory through ethical and balanced governance.

India’s commitment to AI development and governance reflects its growing role as a leader in the global AI ecosystem. With the next AI summit set to take place in India, the country is poised to play a significant role in shaping international AI policies and fostering discussions on responsible AI deployment.

Umbarro: A Journey of Breaking Boundaries and Embracing New Horizons

Staff ReporterCinema 0

“This (film Umbarro) is to show women that everything is possible if they are crossing boundaries and opening their wings like I have done in America,” said Falguni Patel at a special premiere in Edison, where dignitaries, community leaders, and film enthusiasts gathered to celebrate her latest production.

Patel, who also produced the 2018 National Award-winning film Irada in the Best Film on Environment category, has a growing reputation in the Indian film industry. Irada earned Divya Dutta a National Award for Best Supporting Actress. Patel, who is both an actor and producer, has four films to her credit: Irada (2017), Ventilator (2018), Hirkani (2019), and Umbarro (2025). Umbarro is her second Gujarati-language production.

Addressing the guests, Patel shared how her parents encouraged her to spread her wings and pursue her dreams, a lesson she is now passing on to her two daughters. “So this is very close to my heart, and I hope the audience appreciates (it) in America as well,” she said.

The film delves into the concept of human boundaries, which Patel noted are not limited to any gender or age group. However, Umbarro particularly focuses on Indian women, highlighting the sacrifices they make in their personal and professional lives. “It is especially about Indian women who sacrifice a lot for their household work, for their careers, being the first to sacrifice for their family,” she said.

The story of Umbarro follows seven Gujarati women who have never traveled beyond their hometowns. They embark on a journey to London, organized by two aspiring tour operators who serve as their guides. As they navigate language barriers, currency confusion, and cultural differences, the women experience a roller coaster of emotions. They form new friendships, uncover hidden aspirations, and find support in each other.

With a star-studded cast of veteran stage and television actors, Umbarro brings together Sucheta Trivedi, Vandana Pathak, Vineeta Joshi, and writer-turned-actress Kajal Oza Vaidya. The film also features a special appearance by Navratri Queen Falguni Pathak.

Produced by Patel along with Sanjay Chhabria and co-producer Amit Bhanushali, Umbarro has found success not just in India but also in Australia, the UK, and Africa. The film was shot entirely on location in London and is written by Hemant Dhome, with a screenplay by director Abhishek Shah and Keyu Shah. While maintaining a comedic tone, the film incorporates moments of emotional depth. With cinematography by Tribhuvan Babu and music composed by Mehul Surti, the film offers both visual and auditory delight. Songs like the title track Umbarro, London Ke Limbdi, and Travel Mode have resonated well with audiences.

Patel’s husband and co-producer, Chintu Patel, described the film as an uplifting experience filled with emotions, humor, and fantastic music. He expressed pride in its reception, noting that it had earned a high 9.2 rating on IMDb. “People are loving it,” he said.

Highlighting the logistical challenges of filming abroad, Patel remarked, “To have a Gujarati movie shot for 25 days in London was not easy because your budgets are very small. So I really want to thank all the actors and actresses—they have done a tremendous job.”

Patel also praised the film’s director, Abhishek Shah, calling him “a magician” whose talent is evident in the film. He expressed gratitude to co-producer Sanjay Chhabria for staying committed to the project. “We are very happy for the Gujarati film industry and looking forward to promoting Gujarati films in the US,” Patel said.

The event’s chief guest, Binaya Srikanta Pradhan, Consul General of India in New York, commended the Patels for bringing Umbarro to the U.S. and promoting Indian culture. “I would say it’s a true contribution to the cultural bridge between our two great nations. What you are doing is in a very direct way contributing to promoting not only Gujarati movies, which are becoming mainstream both in India and abroad, but also you are bringing the culture to the United States.”

Pradhan expressed hope that films like Umbarro would find a larger audience in the U.S. through streaming platforms. “I am really happy this year we are promoting Indian movies, not Bollywood alone,” he said. He also shared plans for the Consulate, with support from India’s Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, to host a forum in New York City featuring the film’s cast. The event would focus on how films contribute to society and nation-building. “At the end of the day, these movies contribute in many different ways to bind our children to the families, to back home,” Pradhan noted.

Dr. Sudhir Parikh, Chairman of ITV Gold and Parikh Worldwide Media, congratulated the Patels for producing globally popular films. He encouraged them to continue supporting the Gujarati film industry.

The film’s title, Umbarro, translates to “doorstep,” symbolizing the vast world that lies beyond one’s immediate surroundings. Pradhan reflected on this symbolism, saying, “I think all of you have crossed that ‘dehleej’ in one way when you came out of India. This is about women crossing the ‘dehleej,’ but it is applicable to all.”

Srujal Parikh, Joint Secretary of the Federation of Indian Associations (FIA), highlighted the film’s success in India and internationally. He lauded Patel’s achievements as a National Award-winning producer and extended congratulations on behalf of FIA and the Gujarati Association of North America. Parikh encouraged audiences to support Gujarati cinema in the U.S. and spread the word about Umbarro.

TV Asia Chairman H.R. Shah also took the opportunity to thank Consul General Pradhan for his presence at the screening and his support for the Gujarati community.

With Umbarro, Falguni Patel has once again brought forward a story that resonates deeply, blending humor, emotion, and cultural identity. Through this journey of seven women stepping outside their comfort zones, the film offers a celebration of self-discovery, independence, and the power of shared experiences.

India and France Strengthen Economic Ties with Key Agreements on AI, Nuclear Energy, and Innovation

Staff ReporterIndia 0

Reaffirming their dedication to elevating bilateral economic relations, particularly in technology, nuclear energy, and innovation, India and France have signed 10 Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) and agreements during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s historic visit. The announcement was made on Wednesday.

Among the key agreements is the India-France Declaration on Artificial Intelligence (AI), a significant step in fostering collaboration in the field. Additionally, the two nations have launched the official logo for the India-France Year of Innovation 2026 and established the Indo-French Center for the Digital Sciences, further strengthening digital and technological cooperation.

A statement from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) highlighted another major agreement under which 10 Indian startups will be hosted at ‘Station F’, the French startup incubator known as the world’s largest facility of its kind. This initiative is expected to provide Indian startups with international exposure and enhanced opportunities for growth.

Other agreements signed during the visit include a Declaration of Intent for establishing a partnership on Advanced Modular Reactors and Small Modular Reactors, a crucial step toward deepening collaboration in nuclear energy. Additionally, the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) of India and the Commissariat à l’énergieatomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA) of France renewed an MoU concerning their cooperation with the Global Center for Nuclear Energy Partnership (GCNEP). A further agreement was signed between the DAE of India and the CEA of France for collaborative efforts between GCNEP India and the Institute for Nuclear Science and Technology (INSTN) France.

Beyond technological and nuclear cooperation, India and France also signed a Joint Declaration of Intent on Triangular Development Cooperation, underscoring their commitment to working together on development projects in third countries. In another significant development, both nations jointly inaugurated India’s Consulate General in Marseille, marking a milestone in diplomatic relations.

Environmental collaboration was also a key aspect of the agreements. A Declaration of Intent was signed between the Ministry for the Ecological Transition, Biodiversity, Forests, Marine Affairs and Fisheries of France and the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change of India. This agreement aims to enhance joint efforts in addressing environmental challenges.

Prime Minister Modi’s visit to France was his sixth official visit to the country and follows French President Emmanuel Macron’s visit to India in January 2024, when he was the Chief Guest for the 75th Republic Day celebrations. The visit underscored the strong and multifaceted relationship between the two nations.

During their meeting, PM Modi and President Macron held discussions covering a wide range of bilateral, global, and regional issues. As part of their engagements, the leaders jointly inaugurated India’s Consulate General in Marseille and visited the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) facility, a landmark project in nuclear fusion research.

Prime Minister Modi also congratulated President Macron on the successful organization of the AI Action Summit hosted by France. In response, France welcomed India’s commitment to hosting the next AI Summit, highlighting the growing cooperation between the two nations in artificial intelligence and emerging technologies.

Royal Navy Updates Mess Dress Code to Include Sari, Reflecting UK’s Cultural Diversity

Staff ReporterCulture 0

The United Kingdom’s Royal Navy has broadened its mess dress code policy to incorporate the sari as part of its efforts to embrace diverse cultural identities for formal and ceremonial occasions.

This decision aligns with a broader initiative to represent the cultural heritage of Royal Navy personnel. Lance Corporal Jack Kanani, who serves as the chair of the Royal Navy’s Race Diversity Network (RNRDN), recently confirmed the update, which falls under the force’s “Cultural Equivalent” initiative.

“As Chair of the Royal Navy Race Diversity Network (RNRDN), it gives me great pleasure to announce that the existing Royal Navy (RN) cultural mess dress policy has just been updated to include wider forms of British cultural identity,” Kanani stated.

The Royal Navy already permits traditional attire representing Scottish, Irish, Welsh, Cornish, and Manx heritage, such as kilts and tartan dresses, for formal naval mess functions. The latest update expands on this by allowing personnel to honor their cultural roots while adhering to mess dress requirements.

Kanani highlighted that the Cultural Equivalent initiative began more than two years ago. The Race Diversity Network sought input from ethnic minority personnel within the Royal Navy to gauge how an expanded dress policy might enable them to celebrate both their military and cultural identities.

“The RNRDN’s initiative, coined the Cultural Equivalent, initially began over two years ago. The Network canvassed opinions from ethnic minority service personnel to understand how widening existing policy on cultural mess dress would make them feel able to celebrate both their RN and cultural heritage,” he explained.

He further elaborated that the newly revised guidelines now acknowledge other cultural groups that serve within the Royal Navy.

“The update in policy now widens that to be inclusive of other British cultures that serve within the RN,” he added.

A post shared on social media illustrated this change through an honorary female captain dressed in a white sari, paired with a white shirt, bow tie, and mess jacket.

Naval mess dress regulations mandate strict uniform standards above the waist, requiring officers to wear their uniform jackets with trousers, a tartan kilt, or a skirt. With the updated policy, the Royal Navy hopes its officers will be able to display their heritage by incorporating elements such as a sari or African attire, while still complying with mess dress guidelines by pairing these outfits with the required jacket, shirt, and bow tie.

Despite the intended inclusivity of the move, some critics have voiced concerns. One former high-ranking naval officer argued that the change undermines the purpose of military uniformity.

“The reason for uniform in a disciplined fighting service is to achieve a common identity, not to accentuate the differences… Rather than running a fashion parade, what this team should have been doing is to help recruit sailors from diverse cultural backgrounds,” remarked Retired Rear Admiral Philip Mathias, responding to Kanani’s social media announcement.

However, the Royal Navy’s Race Diversity Network defended the policy revision, asserting that it accurately represents the diversity within its ranks.

Additionally, the Network clarified that the image shared on social media, depicting the honorary captain in a sari, was from an earlier research phase of the Cultural Equivalent initiative. It emphasized that the image does not necessarily reflect how different cultural garments will be worn under the updated mess dress regulations.

Jurors Hear Chilling Details of Knife Attack on Salman Rushdie as Trial Begins

Staff ReporterCommunity 0

Jurors were presented with a gripping account of how the 2022 knife attack on renowned novelist Salman Rushdie unfolded within mere seconds at a literary event in New York. During the prosecution’s opening statement on Monday, the court heard how Rushdie narrowly escaped death.

The attack occurred at the Chautauqua Institution, where Rushdie was about to speak on the importance of protecting writers. A poet introducing the discussion had barely begun his second sentence when Hadi Matar, the accused, suddenly sprinted onto the open-air stage, taking about ten rapid steps toward a seated Rushdie. According to Chautauqua District Attorney Jason Schmidt, “Without hesitation, upon reaching Mr. Rushdie, he very deliberately and forcefully and efficiently at speed plunged the knife into Mr. Rushdie over and over and over and over and over and over again.”

Rushdie sustained approximately 15 stab wounds, including severe injuries to his head, neck, torso, and left hand. His right eye was permanently blinded, and his liver and intestines were significantly damaged.

Rushdie is set to testify about the extent of his injuries at Chautauqua County Court in Mayville, New York, a few miles north of the Chautauqua Institution, where the incident took place.

Matar, 26, has pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree attempted murder and second-degree assault. The latter charge stems from the attack on Henry Reese, who was moderating the discussion with Rushdie. Reese, the co-founder of Pittsburgh’s City of Asylum, a nonprofit organization supporting exiled writers, is also scheduled to testify.

The jury will have access to video footage of the assault, which took place in front of nearly 1,000 audience members, as well as the moment Matar was apprehended. Schmidt also stated that jurors would hear testimony from the Erie trauma surgeon who treated Rushdie after he had lost a life-threatening amount of blood.

When Matar entered the courtroom dressed in a blue shirt and dark pants, he reportedly muttered, “Free Palestine, free Palestine,” while walking past the public gallery before the jury was seated.

His lead defense attorney, Nathaniel Barone, was unable to be present due to illness. However, despite requests from Barone’s colleagues for a postponement, Judge David Foley denied their appeal to delay the trial.

Rushdie, who has been the target of death threats since the publication of his 1988 novel The Satanic Verses, has since written a memoir detailing the attack and his long recovery. In his book, he imagines a dialogue with his attacker. Reflecting on that harrowing day, Rushdie has stated that he genuinely believed he was going to die on stage at the Chautauqua Institution.

The Fatwa Against Rushdie

Born into a Muslim Kashmiri family, Rushdie was forced into hiding under British police protection in 1989 after Iran’s then-Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini declared The Satanic Verses to be blasphemous.

Khomeini issued a fatwa, or religious edict, calling for Rushdie’s assassination, along with anyone associated with the book’s publication. This decree led to a multimillion-dollar bounty on the author’s head and was linked to the murder of his Japanese translator, Hitoshi Igarashi, in 1991.

Although the Iranian government officially stated in 1998 that it would no longer endorse the fatwa, Rushdie remained cautious. Eventually, he ended his years of seclusion and became an active figure in New York City’s literary circles, where he now resides.

Following his arrest, Matar told the New York Post that he had traveled from New Jersey to attend the event after learning about Rushdie’s scheduled appearance. He expressed his disdain for the author, claiming that Rushdie had attacked Islam. According to the Post, Matar, a dual citizen of the United States and Lebanon, admitted that he was surprised Rushdie survived the assault.

The trial has already faced multiple delays. Most recently, proceedings were postponed when Matar’s defense team unsuccessfully attempted to relocate the case, arguing that their client would not receive an impartial trial in Chautauqua. The trial is now being conducted in Mayville, a small lakeside town near the Canadian border with a population of around 1,500.

If convicted of attempted murder, Matar could face a maximum prison sentence of 25 years.

Additionally, Matar is facing federal charges filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in western New York. He has been accused of attempting to murder Rushdie as an act of terrorism and of providing material support to Hezbollah, a militant group based in Lebanon that the U.S. government classifies as a terrorist organization.

These federal charges will be addressed in a separate trial in Buffalo.

Columbia Business School Hosts 20th Annual Conference on India’s Global Rise and U.S. Economic Ties

Staff ReporterBusiness 0

Columbia Business School held its 20th Annual Business Conference on February 8, focusing on India’s growing global influence and the future of its economic relationship with the United States.

Taking place at Geffen Hall, the conference was themed “India on the Global Stage: Powering the Next Wave of Growth.” The event was inaugurated with opening remarks from India’s Consul General in New York, Binaya Srikanta Pradhan.

The conference is described by organizers as “the largest India-centric forum in New York” and has been an annual feature since 2006. It was sponsored by the State Bank of India in New York and organized by the South Asia Business Association (SABA). The student-led event typically draws around 300 participants, including students, faculty, alumni, industry professionals, and entrepreneurs. It serves as a platform for networking, learning, and strengthening U.S.-India business relations.

This year’s event focused on India’s diverse economic landscape, growth trajectory, and the challenges ahead. Discussions revolved around how Indian businesses are navigating economic uncertainties to achieve sustainable growth.

According to SABA’s website, the conference featured over 30 speakers and drew 300 attendees. Participants engaged in discussions on India’s economic policies, trade opportunities, and industry trends through panel discussions, fireside chats, and interactive sessions.

“India Business Conference offers a forum to deliberate on the most relevant topics shaping India today. In short, the conference brings together voices at the frontier of their industries as they share their stories, challenge conventional wisdom, and provide insight into the future they are writing – the future of a ‘new’ India,” SABA stated.

Notable speakers at the conference included Sri Rama Mohan Rao Amara, Managing Director of International Banking, Global Markets, and Technology at SBI; Ashish Chauhan, CEO of the National Stock Exchange of India; celebrated chef Vikas Khanna; Vijay Subramaniam, CEO of Collective Artists Network; Vivek Vikram Singh, CEO of Sona Comstar; Puneet Singh Jaggi, Founder of BluSmart Mobility; Arvind Gupta, CEO of MyGov India; Sandeep Vardhan, CEO of Coinopoly; Ritika Patni, CEO of ArtH; Dr. Neetika Ashwani, CEO of KRIASH; Phalgun Kompalli, Founder of upGrad; and Bhaskar Majumdar, Managing Partner at Unicorn India Ventures.

A key session was a fireside chat titled “Bridging Borders: The Future of U.S.-India Trade Relations,” featuring Mark Linscott, Senior Advisor on Trade at the U.S.-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF). He discussed various aspects of the U.S.-India trade relationship, including its historical background, the impact of policies implemented during the Trump administration, and the future direction of bilateral negotiations.

Another major panel, “Betting on India’s Entrepreneurs: Venture Capital’s Role in India’s Growth Story,” was moderated by Pravin Patil, Founding Partner at Prana Ventures. The panel included Vinny Pujji of Left Lane Capital, Bhaskar Majumdar, Pratibha Vuppuluri, General Partner at Plum Alley, and Rajul Garg, Managing Partner at Leo Capital.

Chintu Patel, Founder and CEO of Amneal Pharmaceuticals, spoke on “The Supply Chain of Care: India’s Role in Global Pharma.” According to a LinkedIn post from the event organizers, Patel highlighted India’s potential to become a global leader in affordable pharmaceutical innovation within the next decade. He stressed the importance of eliminating inefficiencies in the sector and transitioning from a volume-driven approach to a value-driven strategy in drug discovery. “He emphasized the need to eliminate inefficiencies and shift from a volume-driven approach to a value-driven mindset in drug discovery. Moreover, knowing when to pursue organic versus inorganic growth is critical to long-term business strategy,” the organizers shared. Patel expressed confidence that India has the potential to redefine the future of global healthcare.

Phalgun Kompalli, Co-founder of upGrad, offered insights into entrepreneurship. He emphasized perseverance, stating, “Stay the course, despite the numerous hurdles. If you stay the course, it’s going to be a rewarding journey and eventually, you build something.”

Vijay Subramaniam of Collective Artists Network discussed the evolving landscape of content creation and distribution. He pointed out that independent creators are increasingly becoming their own distribution networks, using platforms like YouTube and Netflix. “People will never stop doom scrolling and actors shouldn’t box themselves into just the big screen,” he said. Adding on India’s global rise, he remarked, “With India on the global stage, this is just the beginning!”

Another featured speaker was Warren Kevin Harris, CEO and Managing Director of Tata Technologies.

The event received support from several sponsors, including SBI New York, Tata Group, the Motwani Jadeja Foundation, the Consulate General of India in New York, the Jerome A. Chazen Institute for Global Business, and the Columbia Business School Office of Student Affairs.

Work Visa Salary Requirements in 2025: What You Need to Know

Staff ReporterImmigration 0

Securing a work visa in 2025 involves more than just having the right skills and experience—your salary is now a crucial factor. Many countries have updated their minimum salary thresholds, making it essential for prospective workers to stay informed before applying.

From Australia’s increased Temporary Skilled Migration Income Threshold (TSMIT) to the United Kingdom’s significantly higher Skilled Worker Visa salary requirement, understanding these changes is key to planning your next career move abroad. Below is a country-specific breakdown of the latest salary requirements.

Salary Thresholds for Work Visas in 2025

Australia

Australia has revised its visa salary requirements. Starting from July 1, 2024, the TSMIT for employer-sponsored visa programs rose to AUD 70,000 from the previous AUD 53,900. This increase applies to various employer-sponsored visas, including the Temporary Skill Shortage (TSS) Visa.

Canada

Canada’s approach remains flexible, depending on the visa category. The Temporary Foreign Worker Program requires that the offered wage matches or exceeds the median wage for that particular occupation in the region where the applicant will be employed. For instance, as of January 2025, Ontario’s minimum wage was $17.20 per hour, while Quebec’s was $15.75 per hour.

However, the Express Entry program does not impose a strict salary cut-off. Instead, a job offer and salary are assessed as part of the overall immigration application, considering additional factors such as work experience, education, and language proficiency.

Germany

Germany has updated its salary thresholds for the EU Blue Card in 2025. The minimum salary requirement is now set at €48,300 annually for non-shortage occupations and €43,759.80 for shortage occupations, an increase from the previous €45,300 and €41,041.80, respectively.

For the general work visa, there is no specific salary threshold. However, the offered wage must align with collective bargaining agreements or at least meet the national minimum wage to be considered valid.

Japan

Japan continues to follow a points-based system for its Highly Skilled Professional Visa, where annual income plays a significant role in the overall evaluation. Higher earnings improve the applicant’s chances of securing the visa.

For a traditional Japan Work Visa, there is no fixed salary requirement. However, the pay offered must be comparable to what a Japanese worker in a similar role would earn.

Singapore

Singapore has raised its salary requirements for work visas. Since September 1, 2023, the minimum qualifying salary for new Employment Pass (EP) applications has been set at SGD 5,000, with a higher threshold for older applicants. In the financial services sector, the minimum salary requirement is SGD 5,500.

Additionally, the minimum qualifying salary for S Pass applicants increased to SGD 3,150 in 2023 and will further rise to SGD 3,300 on September 1, 2025.

Sweden

Sweden has adjusted its work permit requirements in line with rising wages. The median salary in the country has increased to 35,600 kronor per month, with a new minimum threshold of 28,480 kronor per month for work permit applications. These new thresholds apply to all fresh applications and renewal requests submitted after the enforcement date.

Prospective workers aiming to relocate to Sweden must ensure their offered salary meets these revised benchmarks to avoid delays or rejection.

Switzerland

Switzerland does not enforce a fixed minimum salary for work visas. Instead, the offered wage must align with what Swiss employees typically earn in comparable positions. Additionally, it should be sufficient to support the applicant and any dependents they plan to bring along.

United Arab Emirates (UAE)

The UAE does not implement a nationwide salary requirement for work visas. However, employers must ensure that their offered salary complies with the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation’s fair compensation standards. The salary should also be adequate for applicants to sustain themselves and their families.

United Kingdom

The UK has implemented a substantial increase in its Skilled Worker Visa salary thresholds. As of April 2024, the minimum salary requirement surged to £38,700 per year, up from £26,200.

There are some exceptions, particularly for healthcare and social care roles, where the threshold is set at £29,000. Moreover, applicants with a PhD relevant to their job or those applying for positions listed under shortage occupations may qualify for reduced salary requirements.

United States

In the United States, work visa salary requirements vary depending on the visa category and job location.

For an H-1B visa, the offered salary must meet the “prevailing wage” criteria, meaning it should either match the average wage paid to workers in a similar role within the same region or be equal to the national average for that occupation—whichever is higher.

For individuals applying for an O-1 visa, which is designed for those with extraordinary abilities, there is no strict salary threshold. However, applicants must provide sufficient evidence of their exceptional achievements and industry recognition.

Beyond Salary: Additional Considerations

While meeting the salary threshold is a critical requirement, other factors also influence work visa approvals, including:

Job Offer – A legitimate employment offer from a licensed employer is essential for visa eligibility in most countries.

Experience and Qualifications – Relevant work experience and specialized skills can strengthen an applicant’s visa application.

Educational Background – Some countries enforce educational prerequisites for specific professions, requiring applicants to hold certain degrees or certifications.

With countries tightening their work visa policies and raising salary thresholds, staying updated on these requirements is crucial for professionals considering international job opportunities in 2025.

India to Cut Tariffs Further Ahead of Modi-Trump Meeting Amid Trade and Immigration Concerns

Staff ReporterIndia 0

India is preparing to implement additional tariff reductions on American goods before Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., this week. The move comes as both nations attempt to navigate concerns over trade tensions and visa policies for Indian skilled workers.

Modi will be the third foreign leader to be welcomed by the White House since Trump began his second term last month, following visits from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Japan’s Shigeru Ishiba. His trip takes place against the backdrop of rising anger in India over the recent deportation of more than 100 undocumented Indian migrants from the U.S.

Foreign policy experts believe that Modi and Trump will focus discussions on immigration, trade, and arms deals, with China also expected to be a key topic. Trump has sought India’s support in countering China’s growing influence in the region.

According to Reuters, citing unnamed government officials, Modi’s administration is preparing further tariff reductions to bolster U.S. exports to India and avert a potential trade war. The cuts follow a recent decision by the Indian commerce ministry to lower duties on high-end motorcycles, reducing levies on bikes with engines above 1,600cc from 50% to 30% and on smaller models to 40%, in response to Trump’s longstanding demand regarding import taxes on motorcycles such as Harley-Davidson.

Before departing for France and the U.S., Modi expressed optimism about his meeting with Trump, stating, “I look forward to meeting my friend President Trump. This visit will be an opportunity to build upon the successes of our collaboration in his first term and develop an agenda to further elevate and deepen our partnership, including in the areas of technology, trade, defence, energy, and supply chain resilience.”

The announcement of Modi’s visit coincided with the arrival of a U.S. deportation flight carrying 104 Indian migrants to the northern city of Amritsar. The individuals, ranging in age from 4 to 46, were reportedly shackled and chained during transit, a development viewed as embarrassing for India and Modi, who has often highlighted his close ties with Trump.

Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration, a key component of his election platform, has led to an increase in deportations. Bloomberg News reported that India has already committed to repatriating nearly 18,000 undocumented Indian nationals from the U.S. The Pew Research Center estimates that 725,000 illegal Indian immigrants currently reside in the United States.

Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar addressed concerns over the treatment of deportees in parliament, stating, “It is standard practice for U.S. authorities to restrain deportees, but this wasn’t done to women and children on the plane.” However, this claim was challenged by some of the returned migrants, who asserted that even women were shackled during the flight.

Jaishankar also noted that India is actively engaging with the U.S. government to ensure deportees are not mistreated in transit. Meanwhile, Trump has expressed confidence that India “will do the right thing” regarding illegal immigration.

In addition to addressing trade tensions, India hopes to secure assurances from the Trump administration on legal migration pathways, particularly concerning student visas and H-1B visas for skilled workers. Indians account for nearly three-quarters of the 386,000 H-1B visas issued in 2023. These visas are primarily granted to professionals in technology, healthcare, engineering, and finance sectors.

Trump has indicated support for skilled immigration, stating, “I like very competent people coming into our country even if that involves them training and helping other people that may not have the qualifications they do.” However, New Delhi remains concerned about Trump’s broader stance on Brics, an economic alliance that includes India and China.

Milan Vaishnav, director of the South Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, explained India’s strategic approach, stating, “India’s posture of appeasement is not unique, but it’s very clever. By making preemptive concessions on relatively minor issues, governments can allow Trump to put quick wins on the board without enduring too much pain themselves.”

Trump, for his part, has praised Modi, calling him a “great leader” and affirming that the two nations are “committed to a mutually beneficial and trusted partnership.” However, he has also criticized India’s trade policies in the past, accusing the country of imposing excessive tariffs and even referring to it as a “tariff king.”

During a phone conversation with Modi last week, Trump emphasized the necessity of “moving towards a fair bilateral trade relationship,” according to a White House readout. India, in turn, has worked to prevent a trade conflict with the U.S., its largest trading partner.

Trump has already initiated a trade war with China, with both nations imposing retaliatory tariffs on various goods. Additionally, the U.S. president has threatened to impose 100% tariffs on Brics nations if they attempt to introduce an alternative currency to challenge the U.S. dollar’s dominance.

Defense agreements are also expected to be a significant point of discussion during Modi’s visit. Trump has urged India, the world’s largest arms importer, to purchase more U.S.-made military equipment. Last month, he encouraged Modi to increase India’s acquisitions of American security technology while also working toward a more balanced trade relationship.

Negotiations between India and the U.S. are already underway for the co-production of Stryker combat vehicles, manufactured by General Dynamics and used by the American military. Additionally, the two nations are reportedly finalizing a deal to co-produce fighter jet engines in India for the Indian Air Force, an agreement that was initially reached in 2023.

Sanjeev Kumar, India’s defense production secretary, acknowledged the ongoing discussions, stating, “We certainly wish to expedite the transaction which we would like to have with the United States.”

Despite India’s cooperative stance, some analysts warn that making too many concessions to Trump may lead to further U.S. demands. Amitendu Palit, an economist at the National University of Singapore, cautioned, “Trump’s trajectory is if you agree to him once, you can’t be sure that it is done forever, because he will come back asking for a higher price. That’s a challenge.”

As Modi and Trump prepare to meet, the discussions are expected to cover a broad range of issues, including trade, immigration, defense collaboration, and geopolitical challenges. While India seeks to secure its interests in legal migration and trade stability, the U.S. is likely to push for greater economic and military cooperation. The outcome of the meeting will determine the trajectory of Indo-U.S. relations under Trump’s second term.

Judge Rules Trump Administration Violating Court Order on Federal Funding Freeze

Staff ReporterUSA 0

A federal judge in Rhode Island ruled Monday that the Trump administration is violating a court order by continuing to freeze funding for federal programs.

In a strongly worded decision, U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell Jr., who is overseeing a lawsuit brought by 22 states and the District of Columbia, ordered the administration to restore and resume the frozen funding immediately.

This ruling presents a significant challenge to recent suggestions that if President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and the Department of Government Efficiency’s leader, Elon Musk, disagree with a judge’s order, they may choose to disregard it. Michel Paradis, a constitutional law professor at Columbia Law School, noted the importance of the ruling.

Over the past few days, Vance wrote on X, formerly Twitter, “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” while Musk signaled his support for an X user’s suggestion that Trump openly defy court rulings. Meanwhile, Trump stated over the weekend that judges should not have the authority to challenge recent actions by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Commenting on Monday’s court order, Paradis told Business Insider, “That’s some tough language. The judge is not messing around.” He added, “It’s return fire, to the extent that the Trump administration has declared that neither Congress nor the courts are allowed to question his authority.”

McConnell’s order responded to evidence presented by the plaintiff states, which showed that the funding freeze—previously deemed “likely unconstitutional” and causing “irreparable harm”—was still in effect despite the court’s prior ruling.

“The States have presented evidence in this motion that the Defendants in some cases have continued to improperly freeze federal funds and refused to resume disbursement of appropriated federal funds,” McConnell wrote.

The court was presented with descriptions of continued disruptions in funding to the plaintiff states, including allocations from the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Energy, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health and Human Services. Programs such as Head Start, which provides early childhood education, were among those affected.

“The Defendants must immediately restore frozen funding” while the court continues to consider the states’ claims and the administration’s arguments in favor of the freeze, McConnell’s order stated.

The Trump administration swiftly responded by filing a notice to appeal both the judge’s original January 31 order and Monday’s ruling.

Asked whether the administration would comply with the latest order, a White House spokesperson criticized the legal challenges to Trump’s executive actions.

“Each executive order will hold up in court because every action of the Trump-Vance administration is completely lawful,” said Harrison Fields, the principal White House deputy press secretary.

“Any legal challenge against it is nothing more than an attempt to undermine the will of the American people,” he added, stating that voters had chosen Trump to “restore common-sense policies.”

Paradis suggested that if the court order continues to be ignored, McConnell could find the defendants—including Matthew Vaeth, the acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—in contempt of court.

Trump is also named as a defendant in the lawsuit. However, Paradis noted that holding a sitting president in contempt presents a “constitutionally complex issue” and remains “a totally open question.”

“There are plenty of people who say that just as you can’t prosecute the president, you can’t hold them in contempt because it creates a separation of powers problem,” he explained.

Donald Trump Calls for End to Israel-Hamas Ceasefire if Hostages Are Not Released

Staff ReporterWorld 0

Former U.S. President Donald Trump stated on Monday that the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas should be terminated if Hamas does not release all remaining hostages in Gaza by noon on Saturday. However, he clarified that the ultimate decision rested with Israel.

Trump’s remarks followed Hamas’ announcement that it would delay further hostage releases, accusing Israel of breaching the three-week-old ceasefire. In response, Trump argued that following the release of three visibly frail hostages on Saturday, Israel should demand the release of all captives by midday Saturday or resume military operations.

“If they’re not here, all hell is going to break out,” Trump warned. He further emphasized, “Cancel it, and all bets are off.”

Despite his strong stance, Trump acknowledged that Israel had the final say. “I’m speaking for myself. Israel can override it,” he said. When asked if the U.S. would respond militarily if hostages were not released, he cryptically stated, “Hamas will find out what I mean.”

Trump’s comments also coincided with statements he made in an interview with Fox News, where he argued that Palestinians in Gaza would not have a right to return under his vision for U.S. “ownership” of the region. His remarks contradicted statements from other officials in his administration, who had described his proposal as a temporary measure to relocate Gaza’s population.

In an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, Trump was asked whether Palestinians in Gaza would be allowed to return to their homes. “No, they wouldn’t,” he replied. This stance aligned with his increasing pressure on Arab nations, particularly Jordan and Egypt, to take in Palestinian refugees, even though Palestinians consider Gaza part of their future homeland.

“We’ll build safe communities, a little bit away from where they are, where all of this danger is,” Trump stated. “In the meantime, I would own this. Think of it as a real estate development for the future. It would be a beautiful piece of land. No big money spent.”

His proposal has faced strong opposition from Arab nations. Trump is set to meet with Jordan’s King Abdullah II at the White House on Tuesday. Concerns have been raised that his plan could jeopardize the long-standing two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Egypt and Jordan have also expressed security concerns about hosting large numbers of refugees, even on a temporary basis.

When asked about persuading King Abdullah to accept Palestinian refugees, Trump said, “I do think he’ll take, and I think other countries will take also. They have good hearts.”

However, he hinted that he might withhold U.S. aid to Jordan and Egypt if they refused. “Yeah, maybe, sure why not,” Trump remarked. “If they don’t, I would conceivably withhold aid, yes.”

Trump’s statements could put further strain on the delicate ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, which has lasted for 15 months. The ongoing negotiations depend on significant humanitarian and reconstruction assistance for civilians in Gaza.

Following Trump’s remarks last week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt and Secretary of State Marco Rubio sought to clarify his position. They asserted that Trump only intended for the relocation of Palestinians to be “temporary” to facilitate clearing debris, removing unexploded ordnance, and rebuilding infrastructure.

Trump also expressed concern over the well-being of the remaining hostages held by Hamas. He suggested that those already released were in relatively better health, while the remaining captives were in critical condition or possibly deceased. “Based on what I saw over the past two days, they’re not going to be alive for long,” he stated.

The parents of slain American hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin, Rachel and Jon Goldberg-Polin, urged Trump and his negotiating team to act quickly. In a video message released on Saturday, they called for the immediate release of all remaining hostages.

“All 76 hostages out this week,” they demanded. “End of war. Who benefits from dragging it out for so long? Not the people of this region. Let’s get it done right now.”

Trump has not ruled out deploying U.S. troops to help stabilize Gaza, but he has insisted that no American funds would be used for its reconstruction. This stance has raised key questions about the feasibility of his proposal.

On Monday, Egypt reiterated its opposition to relocating Palestinians from Gaza and the occupied West Bank, warning that such a move could destabilize the region.

A statement from the Egyptian Foreign Ministry reaffirmed the country’s support for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. It stated that this was the foundation for a “comprehensive and just peace” in the region.

Egypt also rejected any measures that could violate Palestinians’ right to self-determination and independence. The statement underscored the right of return for Palestinian refugees displaced during the 1948 war, when hundreds of thousands fled or were forced to leave their homes in what is now Israel.

A senior Hamas official dismissed Trump’s remarks about U.S. “ownership” of Gaza, calling them “absurd.”

Izzat al-Rishq, a member of Hamas’ political bureau, criticized Trump’s statements, arguing that they demonstrated a lack of understanding of the region.

“These comments reflect a deep ignorance of Palestine and the region,” al-Rishq said in remarks released early Monday.

He further predicted that Trump’s approach to the Palestinian issue would not succeed. “Dealing with the Palestinian cause with the mentality of a real estate dealer is a recipe for failure,” he stated. “Our Palestinian people will thwart all transfer and deportation plans.”

Euclid Telescope Discovers Rare Einstein Ring Around Nearby Galaxy

Staff ReporterScience 0

The European Space Agency’s Euclid space telescope has identified a rare luminous halo encircling a neighboring galaxy, astronomers announced on Monday.

This glowing formation, known as an Einstein ring, surrounds a galaxy located 590 million light-years away—relatively close by cosmic standards. To put this into perspective, a light-year equals 5.8 trillion miles.

Despite being aware of this galaxy for over a century, astronomers were astonished when Euclid’s observations unveiled the brilliant circular structure. The discovery was detailed in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics.

An Einstein ring results from the bending of light emitted by a much more distant galaxy, which in this case has formed a near-perfect circle around a foreground galaxy in the Draco constellation. The distant galaxy responsible for producing the ring lies over 4 billion light-years away.

This phenomenon occurs due to gravitational lensing, where the gravitational field of the foreground galaxy distorts the light from the background galaxy. The effect is named after Albert Einstein, whose theory of general relativity predicted this bending of light.

“All strong lenses are special, because they’re so rare, and they’re incredibly useful scientifically. This one is particularly special, because it’s so close to Earth and the alignment makes it very beautiful,” remarked Conor O’Riordan, the study’s lead author from Germany’s Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics.

Euclid was launched from Florida in 2023, with NASA contributing to its mission, which aims to investigate the presence of dark energy and dark matter across the universe.

Gautam Adani Announces ₹60 Billion Investment in Healthcare Projects in Mumbai and Ahmedabad

Staff ReporterHealth 0

Indian billionaire Gautam Adani announced on Monday that his family will invest more than ₹60 billion ($686.18 million) to establish two affordable healthcare campuses in Mumbai and Ahmedabad. These projects will be developed in collaboration with the U.S.-based Mayo Clinic.

Each of these campuses will include hospitals, medical colleges, transitional care facilities, and research centers. The Adani Group stated that the not-for-profit Mayo Clinic Global Consulting will provide the necessary technical expertise for these ventures.

Adani highlighted that these healthcare campuses are the first initiatives stemming from a ₹600 billion commitment made two years ago to support healthcare, education, and skills development.

Alongside these projects, the Adani Group is also engaged in transforming Asia’s largest slum, Dharavi, into a modern urban hub. However, the $619 million redevelopment agreement has met resistance from some residents who have raised concerns about the project’s feasibility.

Meanwhile, in November, U.S. authorities accused Adani and several senior executives of participating in a scheme involving $265 million in bribes to secure power supply contracts in India. The Adani Group has dismissed these allegations as “baseless.”

Allu Arjun’s Pushpa 2: The Rule Becomes a Global Sensation in Theaters and on OTT

Staff ReporterCinema 0

Allu Arjun’s highly anticipated film Pushpa 2: The Rule took the industry by storm upon its release. The movie, which generated immense excitement among audiences, lived up to expectations by delivering a staggering performance at the box office. With a production budget ranging between Rs 400-500 crore, the film became a massive success, ultimately securing its place as India’s highest-grossing film of 2024. The worldwide earnings for Pushpa 2 reached an impressive Rs 1,466.85 crore, and the theater occupancy rate remained strong throughout its run.

After dominating the box office, the next big milestone for Pushpa 2 was its release on an OTT platform. For those who missed experiencing the action-packed entertainer on the big screen, Netflix provided an opportunity to watch the film from the comfort of their homes. The movie premiered on Netflix on January 30, 2025, and within days, it achieved a significant milestone—it became the second most-watched non-English film globally.

Produced by Mythri Movie Makers, Pushpa 2: The Rule swiftly climbed the global rankings on Netflix within just four days of its release. It topped the most-watched charts in seven countries and secured a spot in the top 10 across 15 nations.

Beyond its impressive performance at the box office, the film’s success on Netflix further solidified its dominance. Not only did it emerge as the second most-watched movie worldwide, but it also claimed the top spot among non-English films in seven countries. Additionally, Pushpa 2 made its way into the top 10 lists of 15 other nations across the globe.

Since its premiere on Netflix on January 30, the film has garnered a staggering 5.8 million views, with audiences spending 21.8 million hours watching it. For the week ending February 2, the film held the second position on Netflix’s chart of most-watched non-English films, proving its widespread appeal.

About Pushpa 2

Released on December 5, 2024, Pushpa 2: The Rule stood as the most eagerly awaited film of the year. The movie featured Allu Arjun, Rashmika Mandanna, and Fahadh Faasil, all of whom reprised their roles from the previous installment. The film was released in multiple languages, including Telugu, Kannada, Tamil, Hindi, and Malayalam, catering to a diverse audience.

Following its blockbuster success in theaters, the filmmakers made an exciting decision to re-release the movie with an additional twenty minutes of unseen footage, further fueling audience enthusiasm.

The conclusion of Pushpa 2: The Rule left fans thrilled as it included a teaser offering a glimpse into what to expect from the third chapter in the franchise, Pushpa 3: The Rampage.

Trump’s Senate Allies Fast-Track Key Nominations, Signaling a New Era

Staff ReporterUSA 0

Donald Trump has returned to power, and the Senate is proving to be far more cooperative than in 2017.

Two of the president’s most debated nominees are on course for confirmation this week, marking the culmination of a three-week period in which over a dozen Trump Cabinet picks have been approved with nearly unanimous Republican backing.

This wave of successful confirmations underscores the Senate GOP’s determination to be seen as an ally rather than an obstacle to Trump’s administration this time around. It represents a significant departure from his first term, when he had to withdraw one Cabinet nominee early on and later saw a small group of Senate Republicans derail the party’s efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.

“My goal was to make sure every one of President Trump’s nominees got confirmed,” stated Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) in a brief interview, emphasizing that Senate Republicans committed “to move ahead with speed, with urgency, and we’ve done just that.”

Among the major nominations, Tulsi Gabbard is set to be confirmed as director of national intelligence later this week, with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. likely to follow as secretary of Health and Human Services. This comes after the high-stakes confirmation of Pete Hegseth as Defense Secretary late last month. Another contentious nominee, Kash Patel, Trump’s pick for FBI director, also appears to be on track for approval as long as Republicans remain unified.

Senators had signaled after Trump’s November victory that he would find a more compliant Republican conference, a shift fueled by the party’s MAGA transformation and an increased 53-seat Senate majority. So far, they have been significantly faster in confirming nominees than in 2017, having already approved 13 nominees in the same timeframe it took them to confirm just six during Trump’s first term.

Trump, in contrast to his frequent frustrations with the Senate during his first term, is now expressing satisfaction with its performance. Hosting most GOP senators at Mar-a-Lago on Friday, he praised them for being “really amazing.”

“The relationships are very good, and we don’t always agree on everything, but we get there,” Trump remarked.

While acknowledging that some senators needed to “study a little bit further” before backing certain nominees, Trump’s allies have employed various tactics to secure votes. The possibility of primary challenges, social-media campaigns led by Elon Musk, and private lobbying efforts from administration figures such as Vice President JD Vance and the nominees themselves have helped bring hesitant senators in line.

However, one nominee remains in jeopardy: former Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Trump’s pick for Labor Secretary, is facing resistance from some Republicans due to her relatively pro-union positions. Although Democrats could step in to support her, they are under growing pressure to oppose Trump’s nominees across the board.

Despite some internal disagreements, Senate GOP leaders have managed to advance Trump’s nominations on their own terms. While some Trump allies have advocated for aggressive tactics such as recess appointments, most Senate Republicans remain wary of that approach. Instead, leadership has focused on pushing through hours of floor debate, dedicating the Senate’s early weeks almost entirely to confirmations rather than legislative efforts.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune has used threats of weekend votes to pressure Democrats into expediting the process. While this strategy has had some effect, Democrats have put up resistance, forcing a weekend session last month and staging an all-night protest last week against Russ Vought’s nomination as White House budget director.

The upcoming votes on Gabbard and Kennedy remain uncertain, as some Republican senators have yet to make their decisions. Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell is expected to oppose at least one, if not both, nominations, and Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska are being closely monitored.

Nevertheless, even if all three Republicans voted no, their opposition would not be enough to block either nomination. Collins has already committed to supporting Gabbard. A fourth Republican would need to join them, and Utah Sen. John Curtis has not yet indicated how he will vote.

Despite Democratic hopes for a last-minute upset, Republicans are increasingly confident in securing both confirmations.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the top Democrat on the Finance Committee, which advanced Kennedy’s nomination last week along party lines, pledged to “pull out all the stops” to prevent Kennedy’s confirmation. “There are senators who I believe are going to vote no on the floor,” he said, signaling potential trouble for Kennedy’s approval.

Chavez-DeRemer’s nomination, however, remains the most uncertain. Several Republicans, skeptical of her pro-labor stance, have not committed their support. Initially, GOP strategists assumed she would attract enough Democratic votes to secure confirmation, given her past support for pro-worker policies. However, backlash over Musk’s aggressive advocacy for Trump’s nominees has complicated matters.

A Wednesday hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee will provide insights into Chavez-DeRemer’s standing. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the panel’s ranking member, recently stated that he remains undecided on how much Democratic support she will receive.

Thus far, Senate leaders, White House officials, and key figures like Vance and Trump have been remarkably successful in swaying hesitant Republicans.

For example, Thune and Barrasso personally engaged with Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) as he deliberated over Kennedy’s nomination. Cassidy’s support was crucial—without it, Kennedy’s confirmation would have been in serious jeopardy. Furthermore, opposition from Cassidy could have fueled discontent among Louisiana Republicans ahead of his reelection bid.

Gabbard also directly reached out to skeptical Republicans ahead of her committee vote, including Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.). Additionally, Barrasso and others lobbied Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.), who ultimately announced his support for her just hours before the Senate Intelligence Committee’s closed-door vote.

According to a source familiar with these outreach efforts, the discussions were strategic rather than forceful. “What do you need to get to yes?” was the guiding question in these negotiations, ensuring senators felt heard rather than pressured.

This approach mirrors the strategy Republicans used to secure Hegseth’s razor-thin confirmation. Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), a close ally of Thune and Trump, noted that Young’s handling of Gabbard’s nomination resembled how North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis approached Hegseth’s. Tillis, initially hesitant, ultimately voted in favor after concerted lobbying by Thune, Barrasso, Vance, and Trump.

The persuasion efforts appear to be paying off.

“There’s never any guarantees,” Thune acknowledged regarding Kennedy and Gabbard’s upcoming votes, “but we’re trending in the right direction.”

Mastercard Foundation CEO Reeta Roy to Step Down After Transformative Leadership

Staff ReporterBusiness, News 0

Reeta Roy, the president and CEO of the Mastercard Foundation, has announced her decision to step down from her role. She will continue to lead the organization until 2025, ensuring a seamless transition while a successor is appointed.

Zein Abdalla, chair of the Foundation’s board of directors, emphasized the importance of this transition, stating, “Reeta has been an outstanding CEO of the Mastercard Foundation. The results speak for themselves, but it is the strength of the partner network and the talented, values-based organization she has built that are her greatest gift to our future. I look forward to working with Reeta to identify and onboard her successor and deliver another exceptional year for the Mastercard Foundation.”

Roy was brought on board to lead the Mastercard Foundation in 2008, just two years after it was founded in Canada as an independent entity separate from Mastercard. Under her leadership, the Foundation has expanded significantly, becoming one of the most prominent philanthropic organizations in the world. Managing assets exceeding $50 billion, the Foundation has allocated more than $10 billion toward initiatives in Africa and Indigenous communities in Canada, profoundly impacting the lives of millions of young people.

Reflecting on her tenure, Roy shared, “Serving the mission of the Mastercard Foundation has been life-changing. It has been an honor to build the Foundation and put it on a trajectory to be a force for good in the world. I am immensely grateful to my colleagues and our partners for the impact we have achieved together. Most of all, I am proud of our values and for walking this journey with young people, our African partners, and Indigenous communities in Canada.”

Roy’s personal background is deeply connected to her work in education and empowerment. She was born in Malaysia to an Indian father, Durgadas, a doctor, and a Chinese-Thai mother, Emily, who was a nurse. Following the passing of her father when she was 14, she was raised by her mother, who instilled in her a strong belief in education and self-sufficiency, particularly for young women.

Roy’s Vision for Africa

Early in her tenure, Roy made a pivotal decision to direct the Foundation’s resources toward Africa, believing in the vast potential of the continent’s youth. She fostered enduring partnerships with African business leaders, educators, and institutions, reinforcing the Foundation’s dedication to empowering young people through education and economic opportunities.

One of the most impactful initiatives launched under her leadership was the Mastercard Foundation Scholars Program in 2012. This program has facilitated higher education for more than 40,000 young Africans, helping them transition into successful careers. In 2018, the Foundation introduced the Young Africa Works strategy, with the ambitious goal of enabling 30 million young people to access meaningful employment by 2030. Today, 13 million young individuals have secured jobs through this initiative, with women making up 53 percent of the workforce supported by the program.

Commitment to Indigenous Communities

Beyond Africa, Roy also championed initiatives that addressed challenges faced by Indigenous communities in Canada. Following the 2015 report from Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, the Foundation established partnerships with Indigenous communities to enhance youth education and economic empowerment. This led to the creation of the EleV Program, which has supported 38,000 Indigenous young people in pursuing higher education and securing stable livelihoods.

Leadership During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Roy’s leadership proved crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in addressing vaccine distribution challenges in Africa. She played a key role in a $1.5 billion collaboration between the Mastercard Foundation and the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) to improve vaccine accessibility across the continent. This initiative resulted in the training and deployment of 40,000 healthcare workers, dramatically increasing adult vaccination rates from 3 percent to 53 percent.

Securing the Future of Philanthropy

In 2024, Roy and the Foundation’s Board took a significant step to ensure the long-term sustainability of its philanthropic mission by launching Mastercard Foundation Asset Management (MFAM). As an independent investment arm, MFAM was established to preserve and grow the Foundation’s resources, making it one of the most substantial greenfield investment ventures of its kind.

Roy’s departure marks the end of a transformative chapter for the Mastercard Foundation. Under her leadership, the organization has expanded its reach, creating lasting change in both Africa and Canada. While a successor has yet to be named, her legacy will continue to influence the Foundation’s work for years to come.

Indian Rupee Nears 88 Against US Dollar Amid Market Pressures and RBI’s Stance on Exchange Rate

Staff ReporterMoney, News 0

The Indian Rupee edged closer to the 88-mark against the US dollar on February 10, intensifying selling pressure in equity markets and bringing attention to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor’s stance of not targeting a specific exchange rate level or band.

The domestic currency closed at 87.48 against the US dollar, slightly weaker than its previous session’s closing of 87.43. Earlier in the day, the rupee fell to a new record low of 87.9563 against the greenback, following the announcement of new tariff plans by U.S. President Donald. It opened at 87.9175 against the dollar, reflecting continued weakness.

During a media briefing after the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting last week, RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra reaffirmed the central bank’s position on the rupee, stating, “Our stated objective is to maintain orderliness and stability, without compromising market efficiency.”

Despite this, the rupee’s sharp decline of over 3% since December 2024 has led to speculation in the currency market that the central bank may be easing its grip on the currency, a contrast to the approach of Malhotra’s predecessor. The Indian rupee has been facing sustained selling pressure and hitting fresh lows, largely due to the strengthening of the US dollar.

“…Our interventions in the forex market focus on smoothening excessive and disruptive volatility rather than targeting any specific exchange rate level or band. The exchange rate of the Indian Rupee is determined by market forces,” Malhotra added, reinforcing the RBI’s hands-off approach in directly influencing currency levels.

The RBI Governor also pointed out that while the Indian economy remains robust and resilient, it has not been completely immune to global economic pressures. “At the Reserve Bank, we have been employing all tools at our disposal to face the multi-pronged challenges,” he said, indicating that the central bank is actively managing various risks.

Despite the rupee’s depreciation, the RBI’s presence in the foreign exchange market has helped maintain relative stability. Data indicates that between April and November 2024, the central bank sold gross dollars worth $195.568 billion, keeping the rupee’s exchange rate within a range of 84-86 per US dollar during this period. This intervention has made the Indian rupee one of the least volatile currencies among its Asian counterparts.

According to Bloomberg data, the rupee has weakened by 3.2% since Malhotra took over as RBI Governor. The decline has been driven by multiple factors, including a widening trade deficit, rising crude oil prices, and a surge in the US dollar index after the Federal Reserve signaled fewer interest rate cuts in 2025. Additionally, India’s slow economic growth in the second quarter of FY25 and foreign investor outflows from equity markets have contributed to the rupee’s downward trajectory.

The depreciation of the rupee has been relatively modest compared to other global currencies. In the first nine months of FY25 (until January 6, 2025), the rupee weakened by 2.9%, performing better than several other major currencies. The Canadian Dollar, South Korean Won, and Brazilian Real saw sharper declines of 5.4%, 8.2%, and 17.4%, respectively, over the same period, according to the Economic Survey 2025.

The survey attributed the rupee’s depreciation in 2024 largely to the broad-based strengthening of the US dollar, which gained momentum amid geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and uncertainty surrounding the US presidential election. These factors have led to a global shift in currency valuations, with emerging market currencies, including the rupee, facing increased pressure.

Between October 2024 and January 2025, the Indian rupee was the least volatile among Asian and global currencies against the US dollar. Data further indicated that the rupee ranked as the fourth-least volatile currency in Asia and the second-least volatile against major global currencies, including the Japanese Yen, British Pound, Euro, and Chinese Yuan, during this period.

While concerns over the rupee’s depreciation persist, the RBI’s strategy remains focused on managing volatility rather than setting a rigid exchange rate target. The central bank’s interventions aim to prevent excessive fluctuations while allowing market forces to play a dominant role in determining the currency’s value.

PM Modi Engages Global Industry Leaders at WAVES Summit to Boost India’s Entertainment Sector

Staff ReporterWorld 0

Prime Minister Narendra Modi engaged in virtual discussions with prominent Indian and international figures who serve on the WAVES Summit Advisory Board. The meeting included industry leaders such as Mukesh Ambani, Chairman of Reliance Industries, Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, Anand Mahindra, Chairperson of Mahindra & Mahindra, Ted Sarandos, Co-CEO of Netflix, and renowned television and film producer Ekta R. Kapoor.

The WAVES Summit has attracted widespread attention, with its primary goal being to elevate India’s stature in global content creation. As the country continues to make significant strides in the entertainment sector, the summit is seen as a major initiative in strengthening India’s influence in the global creative economy.

Following the meeting, PM Modi shared his thoughts on X (formerly Twitter), stating, “Just concluded an extensive meeting of the Advisory Board of WAVES, the global summit that brings together the world of entertainment, creativity, and culture. The members of the Advisory Board are eminent individuals from different walks of life, who not only reiterated their support but also shared valuable inputs on how to further enhance our efforts to make India a global entertainment hub.”

The Prime Minister highlighted the expanding impact of India’s television shows and broader entertainment industry, emphasizing their contribution to both the nation’s economic growth and its increasing cultural significance on the world stage. His initiative has received strong backing from leading Bollywood actors such as Shah Rukh Khan and Akshay Kumar, who believe that WAVES has the potential to position India at the forefront of global content creation.

The WAVES Summit was first introduced by PM Modi in December 2024 as a key initiative aimed at establishing India as a major player in the international entertainment landscape.

During his address on his ‘Mann Ki Baat’ radio show, PM Modi urged young creators in the entertainment sector to participate in the event. He underscored the summit’s importance in reflecting India’s growing global presence in the creative industry.

“In the years ahead, as India works towards becoming a five-trillion-dollar economy, the creator economy is bringing new energy and momentum. I encourage all of India’s entertainment professionals — whether young or established, from Bollywood or regional cinema, TV industry professionals, or those in animation, gaming, or entertainment technology — to join the WAVES Summit,” said PM Modi.

WAVES is more than just a summit. A major highlight of the event is the inaugural International Animation Filmmakers Competition (AFC), which was launched on September 8, 2024. This competition provides a global platform for creators specializing in animation, VFX, AR-VR, and virtual production. It is considered a groundbreaking effort to showcase India’s growing capabilities in the creative sector.

Philadelphia Eagles Triumph Over Chiefs in Super Bowl Amid Star-Studded Spectacle

Staff ReporterSports 0

One of the most significant sporting events worldwide unfolded in New Orleans, where the Philadelphia Eagles secured this year’s Super Bowl title with a commanding 40-22 victory over the reigning champions, the Kansas City Chiefs.

The event was not only a showcase of the NFL’s finest talent but also attracted a host of Hollywood celebrities, musicians, and even U.S. President Donald Trump, who were seen in the stands of the Superdome.

Before kickoff, actor Jon Hamm took the stage to introduce the Chiefs, while Bradley Cooper built anticipation by hyping up the Eagles.

Eagles Dominate Chiefs in Super Bowl Rematch, Winning 40-22

Staff ReporterSports 0

The Philadelphia Eagles secured a decisive victory over the Kansas City Chiefs, avenging their 2023 loss with a commanding 40-22 win.

The Chiefs entered the Super Bowl aiming to make history by becoming the first team ever to win three consecutive championships. Instead, they ended up setting a record of a different kind.

Kansas City’s offense had a disastrous first half, managing only 23 yards and failing to score a single point. It was one of the worst offensive performances by any team in Super Bowl history. The Eagles controlled the game from the opening whistle to the final play, though the Chiefs added two late touchdowns in the last three minutes of the fourth quarter to slightly narrow the gap.

The level of dominance was evident even before the game ended. With nearly three minutes remaining in the fourth quarter, as the Chiefs cut the deficit to 26 points with a meaningless touchdown, Eagles players were already celebrating. They poured Gatorade over their head coach, Nick Sirianni, in anticipation of their victory.

The Chiefs’ offensive struggles were apparent throughout the game. They recorded only one first down in the first half, a shockingly poor performance for a team that had come in with high expectations. Quarterback Patrick Mahomes, usually known for his clutch performances, had one of the worst games of his postseason career. He was sacked six times, lost a fumble, and threw two costly interceptions, both of which the Eagles capitalized on for touchdowns.

In contrast, Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts delivered a spectacular performance. He threw for 221 yards, rushed for 72, and accounted for three total touchdowns. His early success included a signature “tush push” touchdown in the first quarter, while his 46-yard strike to wide receiver DeVonta Smith in the third quarter extended the Eagles’ lead to 34 points, essentially sealing the game.

The lone bright spot for the Chiefs was their ability to contain Eagles running back Saquon Barkley, who was limited to just 57 rushing yards. However, that effort did little to change the outcome. Additionally, Barkley’s total rushing yards for the season, including the playoffs, reached 2,504 yards—the highest single-season total in NFL history.

With this victory, the Eagles secured their second Super Bowl championship, adding to their first title win in 2018.

Record-Breaking Legal Betting on Super Bowl Sunday

Legal sports betting on this year’s Super Bowl was projected to hit an all-time high, with an estimated $1.39 billion wagered. This surpasses the $1.25 billion bet in 2024, according to the American Gaming Association (AGA). The record-breaking betting activity also coincided with warnings from officials urging fans to be cautious of scams and fraudulent schemes targeting those eager to place wagers.

The continued rise in sports betting has also raised concerns about gambling addiction, with experts emphasizing the importance of responsible gaming measures.

“Choose Love” Replaces “End Racism” in NFL End Zones

For this year’s Super Bowl, the NFL decided to replace the end zone slogan “End Racism” with a new message: “Choose Love.”

Gene Demby of Code Switch analyzed the shift, explaining how it fits into the larger discussion about diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within the league and beyond.

Tailgate Culture: A Unique American Tradition

One of the defining aspects of American sports culture is tailgating—where fans gather to cook and share food before games, creating a communal experience.

At a Philadelphia Eagles tailgate, fans prepared and served a variety of foods, including omelets and cheesesteaks, offering a glimpse into the deep-rooted tradition of hospitality and camaraderie among football supporters.

Tourism in New Orleans Remains Strong Despite Recent Attack

Despite last month’s terrorist attack, New Orleans has continued to attract visitors, demonstrating the resilience of its tourism industry.

Tourism is a crucial part of the city’s economy. In 2022, around 17 million tourists visited New Orleans, spending over $9 billion. Much of this tourism occurs during Mardi Gras, making the New Year’s Day attack particularly concerning, as it happened just before the peak season. However, a month after the incident, tourists are still arriving in large numbers, reinforcing the city’s reputation as a top travel destination.

US Embassy Launches ‘Mission India’ to Celebrate Ties Between the United States and India

Staff ReporterIndia 0

In a distinctive initiative aimed at strengthening diplomatic relations between Washington and New Delhi, the U.S. Embassy has announced the launch of ‘Mission India.’

The announcement was made on X (formerly Twitter) by Jennifer Larson, the U.S. Consul General of Hyderabad, who underscored the enduring and deep-rooted ties between the two countries. She emphasized the rich cultural heritage and the long-standing economic partnerships that unite the United States and India.

“The United States and India, the world’s oldest and largest democracies, are both incredibly culturally rich countries that have much in common,” Larson stated in a video posted on X.

She further elaborated on the growing collaboration between the two nations, particularly in advancing a free, open, and prosperous Indo-Pacific region. She cited recent discussions between U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar as an example of their shared commitment to regional stability and economic growth.

Throughout February, the U.S. Mission in India will commemorate the partnership between the two nations through a month-long event designed to highlight how individuals, communities, and cultures inspire and enrich one another.

“This month, Mission India will celebrate how individuals, communities, and cultures come together to inspire each other in the Indo-Pacific region and the rest of the world in powerful ways,” Larson said.

One of the notable individuals highlighted in the X video was Chandrika Tandon, a Chennai-born Indian-American businesswoman, philanthropist, and Grammy-winning musician. Her album Triveni won Best New Age, Ambient, or Chant Album at the 67th Grammy Awards, exemplifying her influential contributions to music and beyond.

“We will celebrate the rich tapestry of cultures that create our vibrant communities and explore the values that inspire and guide us, including respect for others,” Larson stated. She emphasized that the celebrations will focus on fostering people-to-people relationships through investments, partnerships, educational opportunities, and eligible travel. These efforts, she added, would help strengthen the connection between the United States and India, ultimately contributing to a safer, stronger, and more prosperous shared future.

The month-long festivities will also pay tribute to those who have shaped the global influence of American music, a cultural force that resonates deeply in India. Larson expressed her belief in the power of cultural connections, stating, “We believe in the power of bringing people together to build vital relationships that drive positive change.”

The U.S. Consulate General of Hyderabad also shared a post on X, inviting the public to participate in the celebrations. “This February, we will be celebrating the various cultures and communities that bring the United States and India closer together to build a safe, secure, and prosperous future for all! Listen to @USCGHyderabad. Jennifer Larson detailing how we plan on celebrating this month. #USIndiaFWDforAll,” the post read.

Varsha Bharath’s ‘Bad Girl’ Wins NETPAC Award at Rotterdam Film Festival

Staff ReporterCinema 0

Varsha Bharath’s Tamil film Bad Girl secured the prestigious NETPAC Award at the International Film Festival Rotterdam on February 7, marking a significant milestone in her filmmaking journey.

The NETPAC Award, presented by the Network for the Promotion of Asian Cinema, honors exceptional films from Asia and the Pacific, particularly those that push storytelling boundaries and introduce fresh perspectives. The recognition is given to films that challenge cultural conventions and encourage thought-provoking discussions.

A jury panel consisting of Mevlut Akkaya, Rainbow Fong, and Rüdiger Tomczac evaluated 15 films before selecting the winner. Explaining their decision, the jury stated, “The film that we have chosen unfolds a coming-of-age story in a provocative way; it is cinematic and playful, with unexpected narrative solutions. The director employs a moody and vivid visual style to take us through the joys, worries, struggles, and emotions of the character’s transformation.”

Bharath’s film features a compelling ensemble cast, including Anjali Sivaraman, Shanthi Priya, Hridhu Haroon, TeeJay Arunasalam, and Sashank Bommireddipalli.

The storyline revolves around a young woman from a Brahmin background who challenges societal and cultural norms in her quest for independence. The film delves into themes of identity, rebellion, and self-expression, portraying the protagonist’s internal conflict as she navigates the divide between tradition and modernity.

US Treasury Ordered to Stop Minting Pennies as Trump Cites Cost-Cutting

Staff ReporterMoney 0

US President Donald Trump has directed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to halt the production of one-cent coins, commonly known as pennies. The announcement was made on Trump’s Truth Social platform, where he framed the decision as a budget-saving measure.

“Let’s rip the waste out of our great nation’s budget, even if it’s a penny at a time,” Trump stated in his post, emphasizing the move as a step toward reducing unnecessary government spending.

The decision follows a post on X last month from Elon Musk’s unofficial Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), which highlighted the financial burden of producing pennies. The cost of minting these coins has been a subject of debate in the U.S. for years.

“This is so wasteful,” Trump added in his post. “I have instructed my Secretary of the US Treasury to stop producing new pennies.”

According to the U.S. Mint’s 2024 annual report, the production and distribution of a single one-cent coin cost 3.69 cents—far exceeding its face value. Despite multiple attempts by government officials and members of Congress in the past to phase out the penny, such proposals have not been successful.

Critics of the penny argue that the coin, which is made primarily of zinc with a copper coating, is an unnecessary drain on resources and taxpayer money. On the other hand, supporters contend that keeping the penny in circulation helps stabilize prices and aids charitable fundraising efforts.

The U.S. is not the first country to consider eliminating its lowest denomination coin. Canada discontinued its one-cent coin in 2012, citing the cost of production and its diminishing purchasing power. Similarly, in the UK, no new coins were minted in 2024 due to the declining use of cash and an adequate supply already in circulation.

Although the UK Treasury has stated that one-penny and two-penny coins are not being removed from circulation, fewer new coins have been produced in recent years. With more people shifting to cashless transactions, the UK has experienced extended periods in which no new 2p coins were minted, and 20p coins have also seen intermittent production halts.

Jaishankar Highlights Deportation Data, Calls for Crackdown on Illegal Immigration Industry

Staff ReporterNews 0

Amid mounting opposition demands for a discussion on the recent deportation of over 100 illegal Indian immigrants from the United States, External Affairs Minister (EAM) S. Jaishankar addressed Parliament on Thursday. He not only disclosed the complete data on Indian deportations from the US since 2009 but also emphasized that these deportations are carried out under the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) established in 2012 by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

In his statement, Jaishankar stressed that the focus should be on combating the illegal immigration industry rather than questioning the deportation process, which has been in place for years.

Ensuring the safety and welfare of the Indian diaspora remains a key priority for Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government. Since 2014, Indian Embassies and Consulates worldwide have actively facilitated the repatriation of undocumented Indian immigrants after verifying their nationality.

For instance, when Kuwait deported 1,700 Indian nationals in December 2015 for violating visa residency laws, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) worked closely with Kuwaiti authorities to ensure their safe return.

Highlighting the Indian government’s proactive approach, former External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj had stated in Parliament in May 2016: “Steps taken by our Missions include requesting local authorities for speedy trials, seeking remission of sentences, providing advice and guidance in legal and other matters, ensuring fair and humane treatment in foreign jails, issue of emergency certificates, and repatriation to India of those who are released.”

A similar situation arose earlier in Saudi Arabia. In 2013, Riyadh had warned the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government about the plight of Indians stranded there.

“During the seven-month grace period given by the Saudi government from April to November 2013, overstaying expatriate workers were asked to either regularize their status or leave the country without facing penalties. Over 1.4 million Indian workers availed the concessions, and during this period, more than 141,000 Indian workers left Saudi Arabia on final exit,” then Minister of State for External Affairs Edappakath Ahamed had informed Rajya Sabha in February 2014.

Under the leadership of the new BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government, countries like the US began to recognize India’s serious approach toward legal immigration and its commitment to the welfare of the estimated 25 million-strong overseas Indian community.

In 2017, the Indian government closely monitored US President Donald Trump’s Executive Order titled “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States.” This order directed US agencies to fully enforce immigration laws against all removable aliens.

Responding to a question in the Lok Sabha in July 2017 regarding deportations from the US, Sushma Swaraj had stated that since 2014, 702 undocumented Indian nationals had been issued travel documents for their safe return to India.

“Issues relating to the welfare of the Indian diaspora in the United States are constantly under discussion between the two governments. Our Embassy and Consulates in the US are also in regular contact with local Indian community groups to address any emergent issues relating to the diaspora. The government remains vigilant to developments impacting the lives of Indians abroad and will do everything possible to safeguard their interests and welfare,” she had affirmed.

The MEA acknowledges the challenges in accurately identifying the number of Indians living or working illegally abroad, as many foreign governments only provide such information when deportation proceedings require nationality verification and travel documentation.

Deportation procedures vary significantly across countries. Some nations do not detain deportees but instead house them in detention or deportation centers until repatriation. Additionally, in many cases, information about the detention or deportation of Indian nationals is not shared with Indian Missions or Posts. When deportees possess valid travel documents, host governments often proceed with deportation independently. Indian Missions/Posts are generally contacted only when nationality verification or the issuance of an Emergency Certificate (EC) is necessary.

Between 2017 and 2022, 132,456 Indian nationals received Emergency Certificates from Indian Missions/Posts abroad to facilitate their deportation or repatriation due to reasons such as illegal immigration, overstaying, or minor legal offenses. Minister of State for External Affairs V. Muraleedharan provided this data in a July 2022 parliamentary session.

He further elaborated, stating: “Whenever any detention of an Indian national for violation of immigration laws is brought to our notice, our Missions/Posts abroad seek consular access and visit detention centers where Indian nationals are held. After confirmation of Indian nationality, our Missions/Posts abroad issue Emergency Certificates to Indian nationals, who do not hold valid Indian passports, to facilitate their return to India.”

Muraleedharan also noted that Indian officials attend court hearings related to immigration law violations involving Indian nationals. Some Indian Missions/Posts abroad even issue advisories urging Indian nationals to regularize their visa and residency status in their respective host countries.

Although no authoritative figures exist on the exact number of undocumented Indian immigrants in the US, the US Department of Homeland Security, as part of its regular operations, deports foreign nationals who cannot establish a legal basis to remain in the country.

“As per US government data, a total of 519 Indian nationals were deported to India between November 2023 and October 2024. Deportations are carried out by the US government through commercial and chartered flights. As part of India-US cooperation on migration and mobility, both sides are engaged in a process to deter illegal migration, including human smuggling, and create more avenues for legal mobility from India to the US,” Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh informed Lok Sabha on November 29, 2024.

While opposition parties continue to demand discussions on the recent deportations, the government maintains that its priority is the safety and well-being of Indian nationals worldwide. By reinforcing its commitment to curbing illegal immigration and ensuring smooth repatriation processes, the Indian government remains engaged in diplomatic efforts to safeguard its diaspora.

A.R. Rahman Calls “Aaya Re Toofan” a Tribute to Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj’s Indomitable Spirit

Staff ReporterEntertainment 0

Renowned composer and singer A.R. Rahman has unveiled the inspiration behind his powerful anthem, “Aaya Re Toofan,” from the upcoming historical film Chhaava, calling it a tribute to the unwavering spirit of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj.

The film’s makers recently released the second track from Chhaava, with Rahman composing and singing the electrifying anthem. The Oscar-winning musician explained that the song is intended to capture the essence of an era, channeling the fierce and unbreakable energy associated with the Maratha king.

The multiple National Award-winning artist highlighted how the song’s composition is meant to evoke a deep emotional and historical resonance. He described the track as an artistic representation of the Maratha roar, structured to be both primal and celebratory. According to Rahman, every element of the song—from its beats to its war cries—is meticulously crafted to ignite a sense of power and honor in listeners.

In a statement, Rahman elaborated on the song’s meaning, saying, “‘Aaya Re Toofan’ is an invocation of an era; it’s a resounding tribute to the unyielding spirit of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. When I set out to compose this song, the idea was to bring forth the Maratha roar in its grandest, most electrifying form, one that echoes in the soul. Every beat, every note, every war cry in this composition is meant to stir something primal, powerful, and celebratory—I’m delighted that this.”

Vicky Kaushal, who portrays Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj in the historical drama, also reflected on the song’s significance. He described “Aaya Re Toofan” as a force of nature, underscoring the immense dedication and passion that went into its creation. Kaushal emphasized that the song was not merely a musical piece but a tribute to the Maratha legacy, with every member of the team fully invested in honoring the historical icon’s memory.

“‘Aaya Re Toofan’ is a primal force of nature. Every single person on the set poured their heart, blood, and sweat into honoring the sacred legacy of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. This wasn’t just a song for us; it was a responsibility, a calling,” said Kaushal.

Further elaborating on the song’s importance, the actor noted that it marked a pivotal moment in the film, symbolizing the coronation of a historic figure. He expressed his gratitude for being part of a project that brings such an iconic moment to life and credited Rahman’s unparalleled talent in making the anthem as powerful as it is.

“‘Aaya Re Toofan’ marks a huge milestone—the coronation of a historic icon, and to be able to bring it to life is a privilege beyond words. I’m honored that the legendary A.R. Rahman sir has powered this anthem with his mesmerizing composition and mighty voice, invoking an era of unmatched bravery. Launching it in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, a land that carries the weight of his name and his sacrifice, feels like destiny bringing everything full circle,” Kaushal added.

Directed by Laxman Utekar, Chhaava is set to release in theaters on February 14.

Scientists and Researchers Scramble to Preserve Public Health Data Amid Website Shutdowns

Staff ReporterHealth, Science 0

Scientists, researchers, and private health organizations rushed to save federal public health data and guidelines last week after learning that the Trump administration intended to take down federal agency websites.

Many individuals have transferred this data to personal websites or Substack accounts, while others are still determining how to manage the information they have gathered.

These archivists, many of whom remain anonymous, now face the daunting challenge of coordinating their efforts to assess how much information has been preserved and to reestablish a centralized network of websites for public access.

“The deletion of information or just the threat of it should make us uneasy,” stated Candace St. John, who is collaborating with AltCDC, a collective of public health workers committed to data preservation. “It’s something that is really going to undermine a lot of communities across the nation.”

St. John, who describes herself as a “liaison” connecting health workers and tracking saved data, emphasized that federal public health data is particularly crucial in rural areas that lack their own health departments, unlike urban centers.

“We rely on these data sets to make important decisions up and down,” she said.

Following President Trump’s executive orders targeting “gender ideology” and diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, federal health agencies began removing related content from their websites.

The scale of the impact has been significant. Since last Friday, more than 80,000 pages from over a dozen U.S. government websites have been taken down, according to an analysis by The New York Times. Among the removed materials are Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) resources on HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) prevention and tracking, as well as guidelines for birth control and gender-affirming care. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Research on Women’s Health website has also been taken down.

Although some of these resources have been reinstated, such as the CDC’s Atlas Tool used for tracking HIV and STIs, they appear to lack the depth they previously had.

Confusion and concern over the deletions intensified when media reports suggested that even more government websites might be shut down as part of an effort to erase mentions of diversity. However, the Office of Personnel Management dismissed these claims as “false rumors.”

On Thursday night, virologist Angie Rasmussen received a call from a reporter inquiring whether she had heard that the Trump administration planned to delete the CDC website. Unaware of this, she immediately informed colleagues and took action.

“I immediately went to the data I would need and started downloading,” she said.

Using archive.org, she saved as much of the CDC’s website as possible. She then connected with Michigan-based data analyst Charles Gaba, who successfully downloaded the agency’s entire website. Gaba has since shared some of this information on a website he has maintained for years.

Others took similar steps. Reproductive health writer and activist Jessica Valenti created a website on her Substack containing CDC data on sexual health, contraception, and LGBTQ youth, which she managed to download before the webpage was removed. Her site also provides instructions for others to submit any deleted documents they have.

Some organizations have also joined the effort. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, for instance, has reposted CDC guidelines on its own website.

Despite these efforts, a vast amount of information appears to have disappeared overnight, and it remains uncertain how much has been lost.

Justin Gill, an urgent care nurse practitioner, relies on CDC guidelines when evaluating treatment options for patients. Last week, while discussing syphilis treatment with a colleague, he attempted to access the CDC’s STI treatment guidelines, only to find that the page had been removed.

“I was trying to look up guidelines because [I had] questions about first-line and second-line treatments … and that resource was completely gone,” he said.

Gill highlighted the significant consequences of federal public health data disappearing, noting that healthcare professionals nationwide, particularly those in remote areas, depend on CDC information for informed decision-making.

“The CDC was the gold standard for accurate, up-to-date health information, and it’s almost like, with great efficiency, it was turned into the laughing stock of health care resources,” he said.

While alternative sources exist for health guidelines, Gill pointed out that they frequently reference CDC data.

What made the CDC’s resources invaluable, he explained, was not only their accuracy but also their centralized nature, making them a convenient and reliable source for medical professionals.

Now, Gill warned, if doctors or nurses are unable to locate the necessary information on the CDC or NIH websites, they will be forced to search elsewhere, reducing the time they can dedicate to patient care.

Health professionals interviewed by The Hill expressed additional concerns about maintaining the accuracy of the information they are working to preserve. Public health data and corresponding guidelines require continuous updates to remain relevant.

Thus, while preserving existing data is vital, it does not entirely safeguard the public against emerging health threats, such as viral outbreaks.

In addition to removing information from websites, the Trump administration also directed federal health agencies to temporarily halt communications. As a result, the CDC ceased publishing its Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, a key source of new health-related data. Although the CDC resumed releasing the report earlier this week, other critical datasets, such as FluView, remain inaccessible.

Rasmussen underscored the importance of the CDC’s flu surveillance data, particularly in monitoring new disease developments. This information is especially crucial given the recent bird flu cases in the country, she noted.

“That puts all of us at risk because then you have a virus infection that is spreading uncontrollably in the population, and you’re not doing anything about it, and you’re not tracking it,” she said.

Trump’s China Tariffs Impact U.S. Drug Supply Amid Growing Concerns

Staff ReporterHealth 0

President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Chinese imports have now been fully implemented, affecting all products from the country, including essential pharmaceutical drugs that millions of Americans depend on.

China plays a crucial role in supplying the U.S. with prescription and over-the-counter medications. A large share of these imports consists of generic drugs, which make up 91 percent of all prescriptions filled in the country.

“The Chinese market is a key supplier for key starting materials and [Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)] to the generic supply chain,” said John Murphy, president and CEO of the Association for Accessible Medicines (AAM).

However, he pointed out that China’s role in the final stages of drug manufacturing has diminished. “I will say they’re sort of less important any longer for the actual finished fill and final manufacturing,” Murphy explained. “But really, it’s the rare minerals, the key starting materials which are obviously critical to the supply chain.”

Many industry stakeholders had hoped that pharmaceuticals would be exempt from the tariffs. Some argued that the U.S., as a signatory of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) 1994 Agreement on Trade in Pharmaceutical Products, was bound by its commitment to eliminate tariffs on many drug-related products. However, China has announced plans to challenge the 10 percent tariffs, claiming they violate WTO rules.

Despite these concerns, a White House official told The Hill that no exceptions would be made, and the administration would not honor the WTO agreement.

U.S. Heavily Dependent on China for Pharmaceuticals

The reliance on China for maintaining a stable pharmaceutical supply chain has been a longstanding issue, drawing attention from lawmakers across party lines.

In 2018, the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission reported that the U.S. was “heavily dependent” on China for both drugs and API. A 2023 analysis by the Atlantic Council confirmed that the value of Chinese-imported APIs had continued to rise in recent years.

Monica de Bolle, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, noted that this dependence is not unique to the U.S. “The European Union is similarly reliant,” she said.

China’s dominance in pharmaceutical manufacturing grew as it prioritized expanding its drug production capabilities, while U.S. pharmaceutical firms focused on other aspects of the industry.

“What happened is that we developed this huge biotech sector where we have a lot of stuff going on,” de Bolle explained. “The manufacturing market just turned to producing these more sophisticated drugs; the stuff that’s used in treatments, the stuff that’s going through clinical trials.”

As a result, the U.S. transitioned away from producing many of these essential ingredients domestically. “That’s why we went from, you know, producing a lot of these things to not producing many of these things and buying them from elsewhere. And elsewhere eventually became China,” she added.

Tariffs Could Lead to Drug Shortages and Market Exits

The generic drug industry operates on extremely thin profit margins, making any supply chain disruption likely to cause shortages or delays.

“That additional 10 percent tariff is going to have a fairly significant impact on the cost of goods for the generic and by a similar supply chain,” said Murphy. “We don’t hold massive stockpiles of generic drugs in the United States. It’s a fairly just-in-time inventory.”

Murphy warned that some pharmaceutical manufacturers might find it unprofitable to continue producing generic drugs under these conditions, potentially leading to shortages.

Across various industries, analysts have predicted that companies will pass on increased costs from tariffs to consumers. However, in the pharmaceutical sector, some manufacturers may exit the market entirely instead of raising prices. This is partly due to a provision in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that complicates cost adjustments.

The IRA mandates that drugmakers pay Medicaid a rebate if their drug prices rise faster than inflation, a penalty that could deter price hikes.

Tom Kraus, vice president of government relations at the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, pointed out that this could have severe consequences.

“You’ve got to sort of factor in paying that penalty, which is going to make you less profitable or you’re going to have to drop out of the market,” said Kraus.

He also noted that group purchasing organizations, which help hospitals and pharmacies buy medications at lower costs, may determine that drugs sourced from China are too expensive. In such cases, they might turn to alternative suppliers or abandon those products altogether.

India as a Potential Alternative

India is another major player in API manufacturing. A 2023 study by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) found that India accounted for 50 percent of API drug master files (DMF), the documents submitted to the Food and Drug Administration outlining API manufacturing processes.

Although India holds a slightly larger share of DMFs, China has significantly expanded its presence in the market. Between 2021 and 2023, China increased its share of DMFs by 63 percent, a trend USP highlighted as an indicator of where API production is heading.

Despite India’s growing pharmaceutical industry, transitioning supply chains from China to India is not a quick or straightforward process.

“There’s plenty of this capacity in India, there’s plenty of this capacity in the European Union and even Canada,” Murphy said. “I think that the problem is there is an excesscapacity. You still are in a situation where it’s going to take some time to scale up additional surge capacity in any one of these places in order to meet the global demand.”

Beyond capacity concerns, Indian manufacturers do not offer the same breadth of pharmaceutical production as China.

“India does not make the range of stuff that China makes,” de Bolle noted. “You can rely on India for some of the over-the-counter medications, you can rely on India for active ingredients that go into vaccines, you can rely on India for antibiotics to a degree.”

However, for many other essential drugs, India’s capabilities fall short.

“When you get into … the rest of it, then it becomes way more complicated,” she added. “And China is pretty much the only market out there.”

As the U.S. pushes forward with its tariffs, pharmaceutical companies and policymakers are now grappling with the reality that shifting away from Chinese drug imports may not be as simple as hoped.

Trump’s Tax Cut Plan Could Cost Up to $11.2 Trillion, Watchdog Warns

Staff ReporterHealth 0

A new analysis by a budget watchdog group has projected that former President Donald Trump’s proposed tax cuts could result in a loss of between $5 trillion and $11.2 trillion in federal revenue over the next decade.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, an organization that advocates for reducing deficits, identified the primary source of this revenue loss as the extension of the 2017 tax cuts for individuals and small businesses. These cuts are set to expire at the end of 2025. The group warned that Trump’s overall tax strategy could “explode” the national debt and lead to “a serious debt spiral” unless offset by spending reductions or tax hikes elsewhere.

The analysis highlighted that the precise cost of Trump’s tax proposals depends on details of the provisions, some of which have yet to be finalized.

During a closed-door meeting with House Republican leaders on Thursday, Trump outlined his tax priorities, which included eliminating taxes on tips, overtime pay, and Social Security benefits. He also proposed new tax breaks for products manufactured within the United States. Additionally, he suggested lifting the cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction, which his 2017 tax law had set at $10,000 per household.

While Trump has proposed certain tax increases—such as eliminating the carried interest deduction and ending tax benefits for sports team owners—these changes would only have a minor impact on reducing the deficit, the committee estimated.

If the proposed tax cuts are implemented without corresponding tax increases or spending cuts, the national debt could rise significantly, reaching between 132% and 149% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2035. This is a sharp increase from the current level of nearly 100% of GDP and an estimated 118% within a decade if tax laws remain unchanged, according to the committee’s projections. Even without Trump’s proposed tax cuts, the national debt is expected to climb due to the increasing costs of Social Security and Medicare benefits for the retiring Baby Boomer generation, as well as interest payments on existing debt.

House Republicans are working on a budget plan to advance Trump’s agenda, but disagreements persist over the extent of spending cuts needed to offset revenue losses and which programs should be targeted.

Meanwhile, Senate Republicans are preparing to move forward next week with a $300 billion spending plan focused on strengthening border security and defense. However, they plan to delay addressing tax policy and other contentious issues that have divided the party until later in the year.

Black Population in the U.S. Reaches 48.3 Million, Marking Significant Growth Since 2000

Staff ReporterUSA 0

The number of Black people living in the United States reached a record high of 48.3 million in 2023, reflecting a 33% increase since 2000, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of government data. The Black population has become increasingly diverse, with more individuals identifying as belonging to multiple racial backgrounds.

For Black History Month, key insights into the country’s Black population have been highlighted. This analysis focuses on three primary groups: non-Hispanic Black individuals of a single race, non-Hispanic multiracial Black individuals, and Black Hispanics. However, it is important to note that Black Hispanics are distinct from the Afro-Latino population.

A Changing Demographic Landscape

Since 2000, the Black population has increased from 36.2 million to 48.3 million, with a significant rise in those identifying as multiracial. The number of Black individuals who also identify with another race has surged by 269%, while those who identify as Hispanic have increased by 210%. This reflects a broader national trend of growing racial diversity and a shift in how Americans identify their racial backgrounds. Additionally, immigration from Africa, the Caribbean, and other regions has contributed significantly to this growth.

State-Level Trends in Black Population Growth

The Black population has expanded most rapidly in states that historically had smaller Black communities. Utah witnessed the highest growth rate, with an 89% increase between 2010 and 2023. Other states with substantial Black population growth include Arizona, Nevada, and Minnesota, each experiencing a 60% rise during the same period.

Texas, Florida, and Georgia saw the largest numerical increases in Black residents between 2010 and 2023. Texas added 1.2 million Black residents, while Florida and Georgia saw increases of 800,000 and 610,000, respectively. As a result, these states now have larger Black populations than New York, which had the highest Black population in 2010.

Meanwhile, some areas saw declines. Between 2010 and 2023, the Black population decreased by 2% in both Mississippi and Illinois, and by 1% in Washington, D.C.

Metro Areas with the Largest Black Populations

The New York City metropolitan area continues to have the highest number of Black residents in the U.S., with approximately 3.8 million Black individuals living there in 2023. Other metro areas with large Black populations include Atlanta (2.3 million), Washington, D.C. (1.8 million), and Chicago (1.7 million).

As a proportion of the overall population, Atlanta leads among metro areas with at least 1 million Black residents. In 2023, 37% of Atlanta’s population was Black. Other metro areas with significant Black population shares include Washington, D.C. (28%), Philadelphia (23%), and Detroit (23%).

Among major metro areas, Dallas experienced the highest percentage growth in Black residents, increasing by 47% between 2010 and 2023. In contrast, Detroit saw no net growth, while Los Angeles recorded a slight decline of 1%. Although the Black population within Washington, D.C., itself decreased, the overall Black population in its larger metro area grew by 3%.

A Young Population Compared to Others

The U.S. Black population remains relatively young. In 2023, the median age of Black Americans was 32.6 years, compared to 39.2 years for those who do not identify as Black. Additionally, 27% of Black Americans were under the age of 18, a higher percentage than among non-Black Americans (21%).

The median age varies among different Black demographic groups. In 2023, the median age was:

  • 35.4 years for single-race, non-Hispanic Black individuals
  • 21.7 years for Black Hispanic individuals
  • 19.5 years for multiracial, non-Hispanic Black individuals

Rising Educational Attainment Among Black Americans

Educational achievement among Black Americans has steadily improved. In 2023, 27% of Black adults aged 25 and older—equivalent to 8.2 million people—had earned at least a bachelor’s degree, nearly doubling from 14.5% in 2000.

Both Black women and men have seen increased levels of higher education, though Black women have experienced the most significant gains. In 2023, 30.1% of Black women aged 25 and older held at least a bachelor’s degree, up from 15.4% in 2000. By comparison, 23.6% of Black men in this age group had attained at least a bachelor’s degree, rising from 13.4% in 2000.

Marriage and Relationship Trends

Black Americans are less likely to be married compared to the general population. In 2023, 48% of Black adults had never been married, whereas only 29% of non-Black adults remained unmarried.

Black men were more likely than Black women to be married, with 36% of Black men being married in 2023 compared to 29% of Black women. Meanwhile, Black women were more likely than Black men to be divorced, separated, or widowed, with 25% of Black women falling into these categories compared to 15% of Black men.

Interracial Marriage and Spouse Demographics

Approximately 18% of married Black adults had a spouse of a different race in 2023. Among married Black men, 21% were married to someone who was not Black, while 13% of married Black women had non-Black spouses. These figures account only for couples living in the same household.

However, Black women were more likely than Black men to have a Black spouse. In 2023, 87% of married Black women had a Black spouse, compared to 79% of married Black men. This includes spouses who identify as single-race Black, multiracial Black, or Black Hispanic.

Income Levels Among Black Households

In 2023, Black households had a median annual income of $54,000. Income levels varied among different Black demographic groups:

  • Multiracial Black households: Median income of $65,800
  • Black Hispanic households: Median income of $60,000
  • Single-race Black households: Median income of $52,800

The data highlights the economic diversity within the Black population, with significant variations based on racial and ethnic identity.

Conclusion

The U.S. Black population has grown substantially over the past two decades, both in size and diversity. This increase has been driven by multiple factors, including immigration and a broader societal shift in racial self-identification. The growth patterns across different states and metro areas highlight changing demographics, while trends in education, marriage, and income provide insight into the evolving social and economic landscape of Black Americans today.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/01/23/key-facts-about-black-americans/

Enviroment

Trump Declares End to Biden’s ‘Plastic Straw Mandate,’ Plans Executive Order to Reinstate Plastic Use

Former U.S. President Donald Trump took to Truth Social on Saturday, February 8, to announce the end of what he described as President Joe Biden’s “plastic straw mandate.” He celebrated the return of plastic straws while ridiculing paper alternatives.

In his post, Trump wrote, “Crooked Joe’s MANDATE, ‘NO PLASTIC STRAWS, ONLY PAPER,’ IS DEAD! Enjoy your next drink without a straw that disgustingly dissolves in your mouth!!!”

He further revealed his plan to sign an executive order the following week, reversing Biden’s push for paper straws and officially reinstating plastic.

Labeling the move “ridiculous,” Trump criticized the functionality of paper straws. Expressing his frustration in a post on X, he stated, “I will be signing an Executive Order next week ending the ridiculous Biden push for Paper Straws, which don’t work. Back to plastic!”

Exit from Paris Agreement

Trump’s announcement came shortly after he signed an executive order withdrawing the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement. This decision mirrored a move he made during his first term in office. The international accord, signed by nearly 200 countries, seeks to limit global warming, though it is not legally binding.

Trump Declares End to Biden’s ‘Plastic Straw Mandate,’ Plans Executive Order to Reinstate Plastic Use

Staff ReporterEntertainment 0

Former U.S. President Donald Trump took to Truth Social on Saturday, February 8, to announce the end of what he described as President Joe Biden’s “plastic straw mandate.” He celebrated the return of plastic straws while ridiculing paper alternatives.

In his post, Trump wrote, “Crooked Joe’s MANDATE, ‘NO PLASTIC STRAWS, ONLY PAPER,’ IS DEAD! Enjoy your next drink without a straw that disgustingly dissolves in your mouth!!!”

He further revealed his plan to sign an executive order the following week, reversing Biden’s push for paper straws and officially reinstating plastic.

Labeling the move “ridiculous,” Trump criticized the functionality of paper straws. Expressing his frustration in a post on X, he stated, “I will be signing an Executive Order next week ending the ridiculous Biden push for Paper Straws, which don’t work. Back to plastic!”

Exit from Paris Agreement

Trump’s announcement came shortly after he signed an executive order withdrawing the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement. This decision mirrored a move he made during his first term in office. The international accord, signed by nearly 200 countries, seeks to limit global warming, though it is not legally binding.

RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat Urges Hindus to Embrace Tradition, Avoid English, and Travel Locally

Staff ReporterCulture/Religion 0

Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat has urged Hindus to adopt traditional attire, refrain from speaking in English, and limit their travel to local areas. Speaking at the Hindu Religious Convention in Cherukolppuzha, Kerala, on February 6, Bhagwat emphasized aligning one’s lifestyle, language, and clothing with tradition, according to The News Minute.

The RSS leader proposed that Hindu families should conduct weekly discussions to assess whether their way of life adheres to traditional principles. Quoted by The Print, Bhagwat stated, “We should ponder if the language we speak, the places we travel to, and our clothes are aligned with tradition. We should travel to places in our own localities and visit our own brothers who need help. We should not speak in English. We should eat our local cuisine. While attending events, we should wear our own traditional clothing styles, not western outfits.”

Bhagwat made these remarks while inaugurating the Hindu Ekta Sammelan (Hindu Unity Convention), an event that was part of the 113th Hindu Religious Convention in Cherukolppuzha. He also addressed the fundamental values of Hinduism, highlighting that the religion is based on truth, kindness, hygiene, and meditation, as reported by The Hindu.

Caste System and Unity

Addressing the caste system, Bhagwat argued that caste hierarchy is not an inherent part of Hinduism. “The concept of caste hierarchy exists outside the core principles of Hinduism. Those who practice the faith should discard it without hesitation,” he reportedly said. Despite the historical association of Sanatana Dharma with caste structures, Bhagwat insisted that it fundamentally calls for unity among Hindus.

He further stressed the importance of Hindu unity for survival and strength but cautioned against the misuse of power. “Strength has its own fears. The way it’s used is important. It shouldn’t harm anyone else,” he remarked.

Discussing global religious conflicts, the RSS chief asserted that most disputes arise from people claiming the superiority of their own faiths. However, he maintained that Hinduism, through its adherence to Sanatana Dharma, is different in this regard, according to reports.

Health Experts Warn of Devastating Consequences as USAID Faces Funding Freeze

Staff ReporterHealth 0

Global health experts have voiced strong concerns over the dismantling of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which provides tens of billions of dollars in overseas aid annually.

The Trump administration has announced drastic workforce reductions and an immediate suspension of nearly all USAID programs. A 90-day freeze on aid funding has been imposed as the government conducts a “review” to align projects with President Donald Trump’s policy priorities.

Trump has long criticized foreign aid spending, arguing that it must conform to his “America First” agenda. His administration has specifically targeted USAID, describing its spending as excessive and highlighting certain programs as examples of alleged waste of taxpayer money.

However, health experts have warned that these cuts could lead to the spread of diseases and significant delays in vaccine and treatment development.

In addition to directly managing numerous health programs, USAID funds other organizations to carry out health initiatives. The funding freeze has created uncertainty among these groups. While some humanitarian programs have received waivers, the announcement has already disrupted services.

Dr. Tom Wingfield, an expert in tuberculosis (TB) and social medicine at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, emphasized the severity of the situation in an interview with the BBC.

“People don’t appreciate the extent and reach of USAID. It goes towards under-nutrition, hygiene, toilets, access to clean water, which all have a massive impact on TB and diarrhoeal diseases,” he explained.

He also stressed that infectious diseases do not recognize borders, a concern that is exacerbated by climate change and large-scale migration.

“TB kills 1.3 million people per year and makes a further 10 million people ill. But four out of 10 people never receive any care and can therefore transmit the disease,” he said.

According to Dr. Wingfield, any disruption to research projects or clinical care increases the risk of disease transmission.

“Whether it’s a research project or a clinic affected, then we run risk of further transmission. People will die directly because of cuts in US funding,” he warned.

The funding freeze threatens not just TB treatment programs but also those assisting people with HIV. Many HIV care and prevention services are run by non-governmental organizations (NGOs), which rely on USAID funding to provide life-saving anti-retroviral medications. These drugs can suppress HIV to undetectable levels, reducing the risk of transmission.

Dr. Wingfield cautioned that treatment interruptions could be disastrous.

“People with controlled HIV, if they miss meds, the virus in their blood increases and there’s a risk of onwards transmission. There is a risk of undoing all the progress to date,” he said.

Catastrophic Impact on Health Services

Frontline AIDS, a UK and South Africa-based organization working with 60 partners in 100 countries, has reported widespread distress caused by the aid freeze. More than 20 of its partners have already been affected.

According to the organization, confusion over the freeze and subsequent waivers has led to serious operational challenges. Many partners have had to suspend HIV treatment, prevention, and care services for vulnerable populations. Staff layoffs have also been reported.

“The majority remain in limbo and this is having a catastrophic impact on communities and organisations,” said John Plastow, Executive Director of Frontline AIDS.

One of its partner organizations in Uganda is expected to run out of HIV testing kits, TB medications, and condoms within a month. These supplies are largely funded through USAID’s President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).

In South Africa, many HIV services have been halted. Some of these clinics provide aftercare and emergency contraception for women and girls who have been raped.

Beyond immediate service disruptions, the aid freeze has also shaken trust in US-backed programs.

Professor Peter Taylor, director of international development studies at Sussex University, warned that the abrupt cuts could have lasting consequences.

“Stopping things suddenly undermines people’s trust. People are bewildered and angry,” he said.

He argued that the damage extends beyond health services, affecting America’s standing in global development efforts.

“The undermining of basic trust is the real cost and that is being magnified in many situations around the world. This is so damaging to the US global reputation,” he added.

Research and Vaccine Development in Jeopardy

Experts are also worried about the future of international drug trials funded by USAID. Professor Thomas Jaki, who leads the MRC Biostatistics Unit at the University of Cambridge, fears that many ongoing and upcoming clinical trials may now be at risk.

“Unfortunately, there are quite a number of trials that are immediately affected by the USAID freeze—both in terms of running trials but also trials that are in set-up and are planned to start soon,” he said.

He expressed concern that the freeze would hinder medical advancements.

“I am convinced the US funding freeze will detrimentally impact treatment development, to an extent where exciting new treatments are delayed by years or even discarded,” he said.

The impact will be particularly severe in fields such as malaria and HIV, where USAID plays a major role in funding research.

Global Health at Risk

Professor Rosa Freedman, an expert in international law and global development at the University of Reading, pointed out that USAID provides up to 40% of the world’s development aid. This funding supports not only health initiatives but also education and economic development.

However, she warned that health programs would bear the brunt of a prolonged or permanent funding freeze.

“This will be partly due to the prevention of further vaccines being distributed or funded by USAID,” she said.

According to Prof. Freedman, diseases that were once under control could re-emerge if vaccine programs are disrupted.

“This could mean that preventable diseases, which we thought had been contained or even eradicated, could reappear or worsen, such as cholera and malaria,” she explained.

She also raised concerns about the wider global impact of the funding freeze.

“Given the globalized and interdependent nature of our planet, the concern will be that these diseases could spread quickly and far,” she said.

As the Trump administration moves forward with its aid review, the future of USAID remains uncertain. Experts warn that the consequences of these cuts could be felt for years, potentially reversing decades of progress in global health.

BJP Ends AAP’s Decade-Long Reign in Delhi, Kejriwal and Sisodia Defeated

Staff ReporterIndia 0

After 27 years, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has staged a dramatic comeback in Delhi, unseating the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and ending its decade-long rule. The victory marks a sweeping reversal from the 2020 elections, when the BJP had managed only a single-digit tally.

The BJP secured 47 seats and led in one more, comfortably surpassing the majority mark of 36 in the 70-member Delhi Assembly. AAP, which had dominated the last two elections, won 22 seats, suffering a severe setback. Meanwhile, the Congress party failed to make any impact, recording a third consecutive election without winning a single seat.

Key Highlights of the Delhi Election Results

The BJP won with a 45.56% vote share, while AAP followed closely with 43.57%. Congress trailed far behind with just 6.34% of the votes, reflecting its continued decline in the capital’s political landscape.

The saffron party’s resurgence saw the defeat of several AAP heavyweights. In one of the biggest upsets, BJP’s Parvesh Verma defeated Arvind Kejriwal in the New Delhi constituency. Kejriwal, who had held the seat since 2013, lost by a margin of 4,089 votes after consistently trailing throughout the counting process.

Former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia faced a similar fate, losing to BJP’s Tarvinder Singh Marwah in Jangpura. After nine rounds of counting, Sisodia was behind by 572 votes. Accepting his defeat, he stated, “We fell short by 600 votes. Hope they [BJP] will focus on the progress and welfare of the people.”

However, AAP’s Atishi managed to secure a crucial win against BJP’s Ramesh Bidhuri in Kalkaji, while Health Minister Saurabh Bharadwaj lost to BJP’s Shikha Roy in Greater Kailash by 3,188 votes after initially leading.

Another significant loss for AAP came in Patparganj, where Manish Sisodia’s replacement, Avadh Ojha, conceded to BJP’s Ravinder Singh Negi by over 21,000 votes. Reflecting on his defeat, Ojha stated, “It’s my personal defeat. I couldn’t connect to people… I’ll meet the people and will contest the next election from here.”

As the BJP celebrated its landslide victory, Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed gratitude to the voters. “People’s power is supreme. They ensured that development and good governance won. We guarantee that we will leave no stone unturned to ensure the all-round development of Delhi and to make the lives of its people better,” he said.

Acknowledging the party’s defeat, Kejriwal released a video message accepting the public’s verdict. He assured supporters that AAP would regroup and serve as a responsible opposition. “We are not in politics for power, instead we consider it as a medium to serve people,” he said.

The elections, held on February 5, saw a voter turnout of 60.54%, which was about 2.5 percentage points lower than in 2020. Mustafabad recorded the highest voter turnout at 69.01%, while Mehrauli had the lowest at 53.02%.

Delhi voters weighed everyday concerns like water supply, drainage, and garbage management against high-profile campaign issues. The BJP successfully leveraged Kejriwal’s controversial bungalow renovation—dubbed “sheesh mahal”—along with corruption allegations to shift public sentiment. Meanwhile, AAP blamed governance challenges on interference from Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena, but this argument failed to gain traction.

BJP’s Resurgence and AAP’s Downfall

The BJP’s decisive victory has ended the AAP’s 12-year hold on Delhi politics, with several of its senior leaders suffering humiliating defeats. Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and Saurabh Bharadwaj, once at the forefront of an anti-corruption movement that unseated Congress, now find themselves on the receiving end of similar allegations.

Political analyst Rasheed Kidwai identified five key reasons for AAP’s electoral downfall:

Unfulfilled Promises: Arvind Kejriwal’s inability to deliver on key promises proved to be the biggest factor in AAP’s loss. “Arvind Kejriwal promised freebies to women voters, but legally, people knew he wouldn’t be able to fulfill them. His case was different from Mamata Banerjee, Hemant Soren, Omar Abdullah, or Siddharamiah,” Kidwai noted.

Shift in Middle-Class Support: The middle class, which previously supported AAP in assembly elections while voting for BJP in national polls, did not return this time. Kidwai explained, “This explains the nine percent drop in AAP voters, including chartered accountants, doctors, government servants, and businesspeople. Due to Kejriwal’s victimhood narrative, confrontational politics, and corruption allegations, they shifted to the BJP.”

Lack of an AAP-Congress Alliance: The absence of a coalition between AAP and Congress also played a role. In 65 constituencies, Congress candidates failed to make a significant impact, yet they still dented AAP’s vote share. “Two and two don’t add up to four in politics. Kejriwal’s margin of defeat and the votes received by Sandeep Dikshit tell the story,” Kidwai observed.

Civic Issues and Voter Perception: AAP’s victory in the 2022 Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) elections backfired, as governance issues such as broken roads, cleanliness, and inadequate water supply were attributed to the party. Delhi voters did not differentiate between the responsibilities of the MCD and the state government, leading to frustration with Kejriwal’s administration. “All these problems landed at Kejriwal’s doorstep,” Kidwai pointed out.

Corruption Allegations and “Sheesh Mahal”: The controversy surrounding Kejriwal’s expensive bungalow renovation severely damaged his image as a “common man” leader. “Kejriwal has reacted to allegations vigorously, but in the Sheesh Mahal case, he could not come clear. He should have thrown it open for the public,” Kidwai remarked.

The BJP’s victory in Delhi marks a significant political shift, reinforcing the party’s dominance at both the state and national levels. As AAP regroups, its leaders will have to reassess their strategy and address the concerns that led to their downfall. Meanwhile, the BJP will now be under pressure to deliver on its promises and maintain the confidence of Delhi’s electorate.

U.S. and India at a Crossroads: Can They Build a Stronger Future Together?

Staff ReporterWorld 0

The United States faces a critical decision—will it continue to lead in an evolving global economy, or will outdated policies drive away top talent? Nowhere is this challenge more pressing than in its partnership with India.

For years, Indian professionals have played a crucial role in driving U.S. innovation. Many have utilized the H-1B visa program, which allows American employers to hire “highly skilled” foreign workers on a temporary basis. Others have arrived as students, some returning to India after their studies, while others have settled permanently, contributing to the U.S. economy as citizens.

Currently, over 330,000 Indian students are enrolled in U.S. universities, and Indian professionals accounted for 72.3% of all H-1B visas issued in FY 2023. In the 2023-2024 academic year, India overtook China as the top source of international students in the U.S., reclaiming a position it last held in 2009, according to the latest Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange.

With Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi securing reelection in June 2024—albeit as the leader of a coalition—the stage is set for deeper U.S.-India relations. However, this comes amid internal U.S. debates over the H-1B visa program and the broader significance of immigration to American businesses.

Next week, Modi is scheduled to meet with Trump at the White House. As both countries emphasize economic self-reliance—through the “Made in the USA” and “Make in India” initiatives—the key issue is not whether they can coexist, but rather how they can collaborate for a stronger, interconnected future.

“This is such an important relationship, and it’s such a great opportunity for people-to-people, company-to-company, and government-to-government to make a difference in the world,” stated former U.S. Ambassador to India Eric Garcetti on the Heard in the Corridor Podcast, recorded at a Milken Institute summit in Abu Dhabi.

Rather than a competition, the U.S.-India relationship presents an advantage. Both nations lead in technology, education, and economic growth, and their partnership is essential for shaping the future. Garcetti described this collaboration as “an awakening” for Americans, recognizing India’s cultural and economic importance.

Kenneth I. Juster, Garcetti’s predecessor, echoed this sentiment in an interview with ABP Live, asserting that despite occasional “speed bumps” involving trade, tariffs, and immigration, Trump would ensure that U.S.-India relations remain “very strong.”

Can ‘Made in America’ and ‘Make in India’ Work Together?

With both countries prioritizing domestic economic growth, can the “Made in America” and “Make in India” strategies succeed in parallel? The answer lies in sound policy decisions, investment cooperation, and a mutual commitment to innovation that benefits both nations.

The potential rewards include more resilient supply chains, job creation, and access to expanding markets. India has significantly increased its foreign direct investment (FDI) in the United States, reflecting its growing economic stature. As the world’s fastest-growing major economy, with a population exceeding 1.4 billion, India is now the fifth-largest economy, boasting a GDP of $3.4 trillion. According to the U.S. State Department’s “2024 Investment Climate Statements: India” report, India is expected to surpass Japan and Germany by the early 2030s, securing its place as the world’s third-largest economy.

Indian companies investing in the U.S. are not merely expanding their business footprint; they are actively integrating into local communities. The reverse is also true, with American investments in India playing a similar role. This is not just about corporate social responsibility—it is about building lasting economic and strategic relationships.

However, if the U.S. fails to modernize its immigration and trade policies, top Indian talent that could otherwise contribute to the American economy may choose alternative destinations like Canada, Australia, or the United Kingdom.

Likewise, if India adopts overly protectionist policies, it may discourage crucial U.S. investments that drive innovation and economic expansion. Both countries have exhibited signs of protectionism under various administrations, particularly in sectors like manufacturing and technology. The bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, which aims to boost domestic U.S. semiconductor production, along with tighter restrictions on foreign investments, highlight America’s increasing economic nationalism. The challenge is to balance these policies to safeguard economic and national security while fostering a mutually beneficial partnership.

Strengthening the U.S.-India Relationship

To maintain and enhance their partnership, the U.S. and India must take decisive action. The United States must reform its immigration policies to attract and retain top talent, while also crafting investment-friendly policies that encourage cross-border collaboration. Simultaneously, India should continue welcoming foreign investment and fostering knowledge exchange.

Deepening people-to-people ties between the two nations is equally vital. The relationship is not just about government agreements—it thrives on strong connections between the people of both countries.

Garcetti emphasized this, stating, “We already have more Indian students in our higher education institutions than from any other country. This exchange enriches both nations, and we need more Americans to study in India to create a two-way knowledge flow.”

As China makes significant strides in artificial intelligence, the United States must recognize the importance of engaging with India to ensure it does not miss out on opportunities in one of the world’s fastest-growing innovation hubs.

Trump recently pointed to the rapid rise of the Chinese AI app DeepSeek as a “wake-up call” for American technology firms. Meanwhile, India is emerging as a global leader in AI, digital technology, and advanced manufacturing. If the U.S. fails to collaborate effectively, it risks losing a key ally in technological innovation.

“India is moving to the center stage of innovation—where design, engineering, and cutting-edge technology are taking over,” Garcetti remarked. “It’s a testbed for AI applications across industries and languages.”

The Role of Investment and Collaboration

Foreign direct investment between the two nations is no longer a one-way flow. Indian companies are making a tangible impact on the U.S. economy. A prime example is JSW Steel’s investment in Texas, aimed at enhancing steel production and creating jobs.

Garcetti highlighted this, noting, “JSW’s investment is a prime example of how cross-border collaboration works for everyone—strengthening economies while advancing clean energy goals.”

The U.S.-India partnership is about more than trade. It represents a shared vision for the future, built on common values and global leadership.

“If you want your life or your business to be about something consequential, come to India,” Garcetti said. “If you want it to be compelling, come to India. And if you want to navigate the challenges of today’s world, the U.S.-India partnership is the place to start.”

Two decades ago, the devastating 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami, which claimed over 200,000 lives, prompted a new era of international cooperation. The “Quad”—comprising the United States, India, Australia, and Japan—was formed in response, showcasing the strength of diplomatic and strategic alliances. However, like any partnership, its success hinges on the commitment of its members.

For Trump, Modi, and the citizens of both nations, the opportunity at hand is immense.

Now is the time for decisive action. The United States and India must reinforce their partnership through investment, policy reforms, and technological cooperation. The future will not be shaped by those who withdraw, but by those who seize the opportunity to innovate together.

Trump Announces White House Faith Office and Task Force to Combat Anti-Christian Bias

Staff ReporterReligion 0

U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Thursday the creation of a White House faith office and appointed Attorney General Pam Bondi to lead a newly formed task force dedicated to eliminating what he described as anti-Christian bias within the federal government.

Speaking at the National Prayer Breakfast at the U.S. Capitol, Trump called for “unity” and reflected on how his perspective on religion had “changed” after surviving two assassination attempts last year. However, during a second prayer breakfast in Washington, his remarks took on a more partisan tone as he celebrated recent political victories and announced measures aimed at protecting Christians from what he characterized as religious discrimination.

“The mission of this task force will be to immediately halt all forms of anti-Christian targeting and discrimination within the federal government, including at the DOJ, which was absolutely terrible, the IRS, the FBI, and other agencies,” Trump stated.

He further pledged that his attorney general would take decisive action to “fully prosecute anti-Christian violence and vandalism in our society and to move heaven and earth to defend the rights of Christians and religious believers nationwide.”

Although Trump did not provide specific examples of anti-Christian bias during his speech, he has previously accused the Biden administration of using federal institutions to target Christians.

On the same day, Trump signed an executive order formally establishing the task force. Its responsibilities include evaluating policies and recommending measures to eliminate “violative policies, practices, or conduct” perceived as discriminatory against Christians.

This initiative follows the Biden administration’s efforts to counter religious discrimination in other communities. In December, Biden’s administration introduced a strategy to combat anti-Muslim and anti-Arab bigotry, following a similar plan in September 2023 aimed at addressing antisemitism.

Trump’s announcement raises potential constitutional concerns regarding the separation of church and state. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution limits government involvement in promoting specific religions, and critics may question whether these new initiatives align with constitutional principles.

Since surviving an assassination attempt last year, Trump has increasingly framed his political journey in religious terms, positioning himself as a leader divinely spared for a purpose. “Many people have told me that God spared my life for a reason,” he has repeated at various campaign events across the country.

Trump continues to hold strong support among White evangelical Christian voters, a key Republican voting bloc. In recent election cycles, this group has consistently backed him due to his alignment with conservative Christian values and policies that reflect their concerns about shifting gender norms and changing family structures.

During his speech, Trump also announced the creation of a White House Faith Office, to be led by Rev. Paula White, a longtime religious adviser. This move mirrors an initiative from his first term when he established a similar office and maintained close relationships with a group of evangelical advisors.

In addition, Trump declared plans to establish a new commission on religious liberty and criticized the Biden administration for what he described as the “persecution” of religious believers through its prosecution of anti-abortion activists.

“If we don’t have religious liberty, then we don’t have a free country,” Trump emphasized.

The structure of the National Prayer Breakfast changed in 2023, splitting into two separate events. Lawmakers attended an official gathering on Capitol Hill, while a separate private event was held in a hotel ballroom for a larger audience. This shift came after concerns arose over the management and funding of the private religious group previously associated with the event.

FIA’s 41st Dance Pe Chance Draws Record Crowd with 800+ Performers

Staff ReporterCommunity 0

The Federation of Indian Associations (FIA) NY-NJ-CT-NE hosted its largest-ever ‘Dance Pe Chance’ (DPC) competition on February 1, 2025, marking a record-breaking turnout.

This highly anticipated annual event took place at the Patriots Theater in the War Memorial, Trenton, NJ. Due to an overwhelming response, the event saw over 800 participants, significantly surpassing previous years. With an extended program, the event drew more than 2,000 spectators who gathered to witness an evening of vibrant and energetic performances.

A total of 33 choreographed dance performances were presented, featuring participants aged between 6 and 60 from 15 different dance academies across four states.

The event showcased a Broadway-style dance production, enhanced by a massive LED backdrop, advanced lighting, and elaborate costumes, which helped bring Indian cultural storytelling to life through the medium of dance.

A significant highlight of the evening was the presence of India’s Consul General in New York, Binaya S. Pradhan, who conducted the oath of office ceremony for FIA’s newly elected Executive Committee. He also made key announcements, including the opening of a new Indian Consulate in Boston, MA, a satellite office in New Jersey, and the Consulate’s transition to year-round operations.

FIA Chairman Ankur Vaidya underscored the volunteer-driven nature of Dance Pe Chance, which is made possible through the efforts of over 100 dedicated volunteers. He extended his gratitude to the choreographers, performers, parents, sponsors, and the War Memorial Theatre for their contributions.

Padma Shri awardee Dr. Sudhir Parikh, advisor to FIA and chairman of Parikh Worldwide Media, took to Twitter to share his enthusiasm, stating, “What an incredible evening at the 41st Dance Pe Chance! I am honored to witness this spectacular showcase of Indian culture alongside Consul General Binaya Srikanta Pradhan & FIA leadership. With 800+ young performers & a packed venue, the energy was truly electrifying.” He further praised the event’s success by adding, “Kudos to all participants and organizers for a record-breaking event!”

The judging panel featured notable figures from the dance world, including dancer and actor Salman Yusuff Khan, Indian dancer Josephine Madhuri Verghese, Mamta Patel, founder of Nupoor Art Academy, and Miral Shah, Creative Director of Yuva Dance Academy.

FIA President Saurin Parikh emphasized the event’s core mission, which is to engage young members of the Indian diaspora while celebrating and promoting Indian culture and heritage.

Dance Pe Chance Chair Priti Ray Patel also commended the event’s role in fostering unity among diverse communities through the performing arts.

The FIA committee in attendance included FIA Convenor 2025 Sreekanth Akkapalli, CEO of TV9 North America, as well as FIA Grand Gala Chair Manan Saxena. The event was hosted by Mamta Narula and Nishil Parikh, who served as emcees.

The organizers credited numerous sponsors and supporters for the event’s success, including CGI-NY, Parikh Worldwide Media/ITV Gold, ONYX Edge, and several other media organizations.

The 41st edition of FIA’s Dance Pe Chance concluded with awards presented across multiple categories, honoring the dedication and artistic talent of the participants. The event underscored its mission of strengthening community bonds through cultural expression.

Iceland Ranked as the Safest Country for Travel in 2025

Staff ReporterTravel 0

For those new to international travel, the uncertainties involved can often seem daunting, making safety a key consideration. If you’re eager to explore the world with confidence and start filling your passport with stamps, a new study by Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection (BHTP) may provide the reassurance you need.

In October, BHTP released its annual report identifying the safest countries in the world for travelers. According to its latest findings, Iceland has been named the safest destination for 2025.

To determine the rankings, the company relied on its own data, which has been collected since 2016. The study involved surveying American travelers about their “attitudes toward travel safety.” The researchers asked travelers about the countries they had visited in the past five years and requested ratings based on their perceived safety levels. These ratings were then supplemented with additional data from sources such as the Global Peace Index, Numbeo, and the GeoSure Global scores for major cities in each country. A weighted total was calculated for each destination, and for 2025, Iceland emerged as the top-ranked country.

“Over time, we’ve seen a lot of things change – the pandemic not least among them – and seen generations come and go, but as you’ll see from this year’s list, we’ve also seen a lot of things stay the same,” the study noted. “Just like a house with good bones, a destination has a good support structure when it comes to safety. The things that make Switzerland a safe destination for travelers are going to continue to make it safe for travelers a decade from now.”

Iceland’s rise to the top marks a significant improvement from its position in the 2024 rankings when it was listed at No. 9. The report attributes this to the country’s low population density and minimal road traffic. “It only has one major road” and is “never crowded,” the study stated. Additionally, the report pointed out, “Logic dictates that it’s hard to have traffic accidents if you don’t have traffic.”

However, the report also included a cautionary note for visitors to Iceland. “Volcanoes. Iceland is a volcanic island, and volcanic islands sometimes have volcanic eruptions. But you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone more languorous about it than the Icelanders.”

Joining Iceland in the top rankings were several other highly regarded nations for safety. Australia secured the No. 2 position, followed by Canada, Ireland, Switzerland, New Zealand, Germany, Norway, Japan, and Denmark, which completed the top 10.

Here are the safest countries for travelers in 2025:

THE SAFEST PLACES TO TRAVEL

Iceland

Australia

Canada

Ireland

Switzerland

New Zealand

Germany

Norway

Japan

Denmark

Portugal

Spain

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Sweden

Just for comparison, here is last year’s list:

Canada

Switzerland

Norway

Ireland

Netherlands

United Kingdom

Portugal

Denmark

Iceland

Australia

New Zealand

Japan

France

Spain

Brazil

Bird Flu and Food Safety: Experts Weigh In on Risks from Milk and Eggs

Staff ReporterHealth 0

As bird flu continues to spread across the United States, concerns have arisen regarding the possibility of contracting the virus from consuming milk or eggs. The outbreak, caused by the H5N1 strain of avian influenza, has led to the culling of over 150 million poultry birds in an effort to contain its spread. This has contributed to rising egg prices and supply shortages. Additionally, reports have emerged of bird flu virus fragments being found in milk products, raising further questions about food safety.

Despite these concerns, health experts emphasize that the risk to the general publicremains low. They also stress that it is highly unlikely for milk or eggs sold in stores to be contaminated with the virus. Nevertheless, they advise consumers to take basic precautions to mitigate any potential risks.

“The risk to the public to contract bird flu from items that they get in the grocery store is exceptionally low,” Dr. Nicole Martin, an assistant research professor in dairy foods microbiology at Cornell University, told ABC News. “We know that pasteurization has been shown to be very effective at eliminating the virus from milk. … And then on the poultry and egg side, [there is] very low risk that eggs make it to the marketplace with the avian flu.”

Low Risk from Commercial Eggs in Grocery Stores

To ensure food safety, government regulations require egg processors to wash and sanitize eggs that are graded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Additionally, pasteurized eggs, which undergo a heating process to eliminate pathogens, are available in many grocery stores if their pasteurization method has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Even if bird flu were to contaminate an egg, experts say that cooking it properly would eliminate the virus. “The normal cooking process would kill that virus,” Dr. David Cennimo, an associate professor of medicine at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, explained to ABC News. “So, the only theoretical risk is if you’re eating raw or undercooked eggs, and again, the flocks are being monitored for bird flu.”

When bird flu is detected in poultry or bird species, authorities take swift action to prevent further spread by depopulating, or culling, the entire flock. This means that potentially infected eggs are removed from the food supply before they ever reach consumers.

Dr. Cameron Wolfe, a professor of infectious diseases at Duke University, confirmed that eggs from culled flocks are discarded. However, he noted that it is uncertain how far back authorities should go in determining which eggs were affected before the culling took place. “If you find today that your flock is affected, and this week we’re going to cull that flock and we’ll take the eggs out, I don’t know how far you can go back to understand which eggs might have been affected,” he said. “But we do take them out of circulation.”

Pasteurized Milk Is Safe, but Raw Milk Poses a Risk

Milk products are also considered safe due to the process of pasteurization, which involves heating liquids to a high temperature for a short period to kill harmful viruses and bacteria. This includes not only milk but also dairy products such as yogurt and cheese.

In April 2024, reports surfaced indicating that bird flu virus fragments were detected in samples of pasteurized milk. However, experts clarified that these fragments were merely inactive remnants of the virus and posed no risk to consumers.

While pasteurized milk is deemed safe, raw milk remains a potential health hazard. The FDA has long warned against the consumption of unpasteurized milk and dairy products, categorizing it as a “high-risk choice.”

Dr. Martin explained that the presence of avian influenza in dairy cattle makes raw milk especially dangerous. “With the avian influenza virus that’s currently circulating in dairy cattle in the United States, the raw milk itself has a very high concentration of this virus,” she said. “And so what we know is that there have been many demonstrated cases of animals becoming ill and dying from drinking this contaminated milk.”

While there is no clear evidence that humans have become ill from consuming contaminated raw milk, Martin cautioned that there are no effective strategies to remove the virus from raw dairy products outside of pasteurization.

Does Freezing Eggs or Milk Kill Bird Flu?

Some may wonder whether freezing could help eliminate the virus, but experts confirm that this is not an effective solution. Many pathogens, including H5N1, can survive in low or freezing temperatures.

Dr. Cennimo explained that freezing does not inactivate the influenza virus and compared it to international travel precautions. “If you’ve gotten good travel advice, they’ll tell you, ‘Don’t drink anything with ice in it,’ because the ice cubes are things that are infected because they were made by local water,” he said.”So that just shows you right there, a literal ice cube can harbor bacteria. So freezing meat or eggs or whatever is not going to help. As far as we know, freezing does not inactivate influenza.”

Conclusion

While the spread of bird flu in the U.S. has raised concerns, experts emphasize that the risk of contracting the virus from commercially available milk and eggs remains extremely low. Government regulations, pasteurization, and the culling of infected flocks serve as effective safeguards in protecting the public.

However, experts continue to advise caution when consuming raw or undercooked eggs, as well as raw milk. Proper cooking and pasteurization remain the best defenses against any potential exposure to the virus.

Seattle Council Member Kshama Sawant Claims India Denied Visa Over Anti-Caste Law

Staff ReporterWomen 0

Seattle City Council member Kshama Sawant, who is of Indian origin, has alleged that she was denied an Indian visa to visit her ailing mother. She asserted that her name is on a “visa reject” list due to her role in passing a law in Washington state that bans caste discrimination.

This marks the third time in the past year that her visa application has been rejected. In response, Sawant and members of her organization, ‘Workers Strike Back,’ staged a sit-in protest at the Indian Consulate in Seattle, describing it as an act of “peaceful civil disobedience.”

Officials from the Indian Consulate called local police to handle the situation.

Sawant shared her experience on X, stating, “My husband & I are in the Seattle Indian Consulate. They granted him an emergency visa for my mother being very sick, but rejected mine, literally saying my name is on a ‘reject list’.” She further wrote, “They are refusing to give an explanation. We’re refusing to leave. They’re threatening to call the police on us.”

The Indian Consulate in Seattle also posted on X, presenting their version of the incident. “The Consulate was forced to deal with a law and order situation arising from the unauthorised entry by certain individuals into the Consulate premises after office hours,” their statement read.

The Consulate claimed, “Despite repeated requests, these individuals refused to leave the Consulate premises and engaged in aggressive and threatening behaviour with the Consulate staff. We were compelled to call in relevant local authorities to deal with the situation. Further action is being initiated against the trespassers.”

In a separate post on X, Sawant alleged, “A Consular officer said I’m being denied a visa because I’m on the Modi (Prime Minister Narendra Modi) government’s ‘reject list’.”

She attributed her visa denial to a resolution she had introduced in the Seattle City Council, which she believes led to her being placed on the “visa reject” list. “It’s clear why,” she stated. “My socialist City Council office passed a resolution condemning Modi’s anti-Muslim anti-poor CAA-NRC citizenship law. We also won a historic ban on caste discrimination.”

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), passed by India’s Parliament in 2019, and the National Register of Citizens (NRC) have been contentious policies, drawing both domestic and international debate.

In 2023, under Sawant’s leadership, the Seattle City Council became the first U.S. city to include caste as a protected category in its anti-discrimination laws. This legislation also made Seattle the first city outside South Asia to ban caste discrimination.

Queens Leaders Rally Behind Jenifer Rajkumar for NYC Public Advocate

Staff ReporterWomen 0

A broad coalition of leaders from Queens has come forward to endorse New York State Assemblywoman Jenifer Rajkumar in her bid to become New York City’s next Public Advocate.

On February 3, 2025, several prominent elected officials announced their support for Rajkumar, highlighting her record of community service and legislative achievements. The endorsements came from State Senator Joseph Addabbo (D-SD 15), whose district encompasses neighborhoods such as Lindenwood, Ozone Park, Woodhaven, Glendale, Maspeth, Middle Village, Rego Park, Forest Hills, Kew Gardens, Richmond Hill, South Richmond Hill, and South Ozone Park.

Assemblyman David Weprin (D-AD 24), who represents Richmond Hill as well as portions of Briarwood, Jamaica Estates, Jamaica Hills, Hollis, and Oakland Gardens, also threw his support behind Rajkumar. Joining him was Assemblywoman Nily Rozic (D-AD 25), whose district covers Flushing, Queensboro Hill, Hillcrest, Fresh Meadows, Oakland Gardens, Bayside, and Douglaston.

Assemblyman Sam Berger (D-AD 27) endorsed Rajkumar as well. His district includes Pomonok, Electchester, Kew Gardens Hills, College Point, and Whitestone. City Councilman Robert Holden (D-CD 30), whose district covers Maspeth, Middle Village, and parts of Glendale, Ridgewood, Elmhurst, and Rego Park, also publicly supported Rajkumar’s campaign.

In a statement released by Rajkumar’s office, the officials praised her for her leadership and accomplishments, both at the community level and citywide.

“They recognized her as a champion of public safety, a leading voice against anti-Semitism and all forms of hate, and a common-sense problem solver tackling the biggest quality of life issues New Yorkers face today,” the press release stated. Additionally, the officials drew a sharp contrast between Rajkumar and the current Public Advocate, Jumaane Williams.

Councilman Holden was particularly critical of Williams’ performance, saying, “Jumaane Williams is no advocate—he spends his time tweeting, grandstanding, and attending protests while his office remains closed and inaccessible to the public.”

Holden further praised Rajkumar’s approach, stating that she is dedicated to “real constituent services and common sense legislation,” and emphasized that she would restore the Public Advocate’s office to its intended role. “She will finally use the office as intended—to serve the people, not play politics. In a time of chaos, Jenifer stands out as the leader we need. I’m proud to endorse her in the Democratic primary,” he said.

State Senator Addabbo also endorsed Rajkumar, commending her for prioritizing “results over ideology, and coalition building over division.”

Assemblyman Weprin highlighted Rajkumar’s tireless advocacy, saying, “Jenifer’s energy and vision for Public Advocate are exactly what New York needs to tackle the unprecedented challenges we face today. New Yorkers know the real thing when we see it, and we have seen Jenifer’s indefatigable omnipresence coming to the aid of every community in the Five Boroughs.”

Weprin also pointed to her legislative successes in Albany. “In Albany, we have seen her passion and dedication to score some of the biggest legislative victories. From making history by passing the Diwali School Holiday bill to the SMOKEOUT Act that ended New Yorkers’ number one quality of life issue in a matter of months, Jenifer has proven herself to be responsive to people’s needs and fearless in taking on every challenge,” he said.

Assemblywoman Rozic also praised Rajkumar’s leadership abilities, stating, “New Yorkers need creative problem solvers like Jenifer Rajkumar. Jenifer is a natural leader who knows how to build diverse coalitions that get things done, which is why she’s my pick for Public Advocate.”

Assemblyman Berger echoed those sentiments, describing Rajkumar as “the right choice for our families, our neighbors, and our communities who are concerned about public safety and the rising tide of hate crimes.”

Rajkumar’s campaign for Public Advocate has gained momentum with these key endorsements, positioning her as a strong contender in the upcoming race.

Malankara Dam: A Scenic Retreat in Idukki’s Lush Landscape

Staff ReporterTourism 0

Tucked away in the picturesque Idukki district, Malankara Dam is a serene getaway located just 7 kilometers from Thodupuzha. This tranquil destination is an integral part of the Muvattupuzha Valley Irrigation Project, serving as a crucial hydroelectric and irrigation resource. With its pristine waters and breathtaking surroundings, the dam has become a favored spot for families, nature lovers, and those seeking a peaceful escape.

Constructed across the Thodupuzha River, Malankara Dam forms an artificial lake that stretches for approximately 11 kilometers. This expansive reservoir has evolved into a center for recreational activities such as boating and fishing, offering visitors a serene space to relax and unwind. The dam is enveloped by lush greenery, rolling hills, and an abundance of vibrant flora, making it an ideal location for picnics and leisurely walks.

Efforts have been made to enhance visitor experiences at Malankara Dam through well-planned facilities. The site features a children’s park, well-maintained walking tracks, and an entrance plaza equipped with essential amenities like toilet blocks, drinking water, and an amphitheater. These additions cater to families and groups, making the dam an attractive destination for all age groups. Open to visitors daily for a nominal entry fee, the revenue collected is directed towards maintaining and further improving the site.

One of Malankara Dam’s biggest attractions is its proximity to renowned tourist destinations such as Munnar, Vagamon, Thekkady, and the Idukki Wildlife Sanctuary. Many travelers use the dam as a starting point for their journey into the natural marvels of the region. With its panoramic views and tranquil ambiance, it is also a preferred location for photographers and nature enthusiasts.

Whether it’s a scenic boat ride, a quiet walk along the pathways, or simply taking in the beauty of the surrounding hills and valleys, Malankara Dam promises a memorable experience. Its perfect blend of recreation, accessibility, and natural splendor makes it one of Kerala’s must-visit destinations.

How to Reach

By Bus: Thodupuzha Bus Stand, located approximately 6.6 km away.

By Flight: Cochin International Airport, situated around 59.5 km away.

By Train: Kottayam Railway Station, about 53.1 km away, and Aluva Railway Station, around 60.7 km away.

Indian Embassy to Open 14 New Consular Service Centers in UAE

Staff ReporterImmigration 0

In a significant move to improve consular services, the Indian Embassy has announced the launch of 14 new service centers under the Indian Consular Application Centre (ICAC) in the UAE.

These centers, set to open in the second quarter of this year, will be spread across the UAE, making consular services more accessible to Indian expatriates. As per the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Outsourcing of CPV Services at the Embassy of India in Abu Dhabi and the Consulate General of India in Dubai, released on January 31, these centers will be strategically located to enhance accessibility. The proposed ICAC branches will be established in the following areas: Abu Dhabi (Al Khalidiya, Al Reem, Musaffah, Al Ain, Ghayathi), Dubai (Bur Dubai, JLT/Marina), Sharjah (Al Majaz), Ajman (Al Jurf), Fujairah, Umm Al Quwain, Khor Fakkan (Corniche, Subaru), Kalba, and Ras Al Khaimah (Nakheel, Khuzam, Mareed).

The proposal outlines, “14 Indian Consular Application Centres (ICACs) for CPV Services as specified in Section 1(A) (xi) of Chapter VII under the jurisdiction of Mission/Post in Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah, Ajman, Fujairah, Umm Al Quwain, Khor Fakkan, Kalba and Ras Al Khaimah in well-connected commercial complexes with ample parking facilities for applicants, in prime locations.”

To operate these centers, the embassy has issued a tender to identify service providers for the ICAC. This initiative is designed to integrate all consular services into a single system, benefiting approximately four million Indian nationals residing in the UAE, in addition to foreign nationals applying for Indian visas.

At present, the Indian Embassy relies on BLS International for passport and visa applications, while IVS Global handles document attestation. Some services are directly overseen by the Indian Embassy and the Consulate General in Dubai. The introduction of ICAC aims to streamline these services, bringing them under one unified, efficient system.

The primary goal of the ICAC initiative is to enhance service quality by improving operational efficiency and ensuring greater transparency. Some of the key features of this proposed system include:

  • A new online portal for scheduling appointments
  • Faster appointment slots available within five days
  • Reduced processing time of 30 minutes per application

As stated in the Request for Proposal (RFP), service providers that fail to meet the required efficiency standards may face financial penalties. Between January 2022 and December 2024, Indian embassies processed over 1.58 million transactions, handling an average of 1,760 applications daily.

The ICAC project was initially planned for launch in January 2024 following a tender issued in 2023. However, due to technical difficulties, the rollout was delayed.

With this latest announcement, Indian nationals in the UAE can look forward to improved access to consular services through this new, centralized system.

Sikh Community Plays Key Role at International Religious Freedom Summit in Washington, D.C.

Staff ReporterCommunity 0

The Sikh community in the United States was prominently featured at the International Religious Freedom (IRF) Summit, held from February 3 to 5 at the Hilton in Washington, D.C.

Dr. Surinder Singh Gill, Ambassador for Peace, and Ajaypal Singh from the Sikh Temple underscored the significance of religious rights while highlighting Sikhism’s role in promoting global peace and fostering interfaith cooperation.

Ensuring comprehensive media representation, Harjit Singh Hundal, CEO of Sabrang TV, provided coverage of the event, making sure the Sikh perspective was well documented.

The IRF Summit serves as an annual platform that unites more than 90 organizations from 30 different faith traditions to advocate for religious freedom across the globe. Over the past three years, this coalition has consistently worked to protect the right to religious belief and practice. However, despite the expansion of their movement, the world continues to witness rising incidents of religious persecution and increasing restrictions.

A major issue addressed at this year’s summit was the growing constraints imposed on Christian communities in Japan. American-Japanese representatives voiced serious apprehensions regarding religious freedom in the country, urging the global community to advocate for stronger safeguards. Speakers emphasized the necessity for all religious groups to exercise their faith freely, without fear of prejudice or repression.

The summit also focused on bolstering political and civil backing for religious freedom worldwide, encouraging both governments and communities to defend this fundamental right.

The event featured a lineup of distinguished speakers, including Jenkins, President of the Universal Peace Federation (UPF); Patricia Dual, a human rights attorney; former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich; Rev. Tomihiro Tanaka, President of the Family Federation for World Peace Japan; Dr. Marco Respinti, Director of Bitter Magazine; former U.S. Representative Dan Burton; Ambassador Sam Brownback; and Dr. Katrina Lantos.

As the summit drew to a close, participants collectively called for international unity in guaranteeing that all religious communities, including Christians, could practice their faith without obstruction. The event reinforced the shared responsibility of nations to uphold human rights and safeguard individuals’ ability to worship without fear.

UK Population Report: Increase in LGB Identification Among Young People Suggests Social Influence

Staff ReporterReligion 0

The United Kingdom’s Office of National Statistics (ONS) has released its Annual Report on population, which includes data on sexual orientation. According to the report, 3.8% of the UK population aged 16 and older identified as lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) in 2023, a notable rise from 2.2% in 2018. A significant trend observed is that younger individuals are more likely to identify as LGB than older age groups. Specifically, 10.4% of individuals aged 16 to 24 identified as LGB, while only 0.9% of those over 65 did the same. In 2018, the percentage of young people identifying as LGB was 4.4%, meaning that in just five years, the figure has increased by six percentage points.

What does this statistical change imply? One interpretation is that homosexuality is not purely genetic or a natural component of sexual orientation. If it were an inherent trait, the percentage of individuals identifying as homosexual would remain stable over time. Instead, the data suggests a sharp rise among younger generations within a short period. Additionally, the difference in LGB identification between younger and older individuals is pronounced. If homosexuality were innate, the percentages would be similar across all age groups. However, statistics from other countries also reflect this pattern, where the highest concentration of LGB individuals is found among younger populations.

A common counterargument is that older individuals are less likely to openly identify as LGB due to growing up in a more stigmatized social environment. This theory suggests that younger people feel more comfortable expressing their sexuality because of societal shifts in acceptance. However, this objection does not hold when considering that the survey was conducted anonymously. Respondents, including older and elderly individuals, could freely disclose their sexual orientation without external pressure. Therefore, the discrepancy between age groups cannot be entirely explained by social stigma.

This leads to the question: why are younger individuals more likely to identify as LGB? The data suggests that homosexuality has become a social trend rather than an inherent condition. Younger people tend to be more influenced by societal shifts and cultural movements. They are also more likely to challenge conventional norms and explore new identities. This could explain why the proportion of LGB individuals is higher among younger generations.

Furthermore, the increase in LGB identification between 2018 and 2023 is primarily driven by those identifying as bisexual rather than exclusively gay or lesbian. This implies that, for many, homosexuality is an experimental phase rather than a definitive shift in orientation. Many individuals who identify as bisexual still maintain an attraction to the opposite sex, reinforcing the idea that sexual orientation is fluid and influenced by external factors. This serves as additional evidence that homosexuality is not solely a natural inclination but is shaped by cultural and social conditions.

It is also worth noting that even if homosexuality were innate, it does not necessarily mean it is natural. Not all innate behaviors or characteristics can be classified as natural.

Another revealing statistic from the report states: “The majority of people that identified as LGB in 2023 had never married or had a civil union (77.2%), as compared with the 36.8% of people that identified themselves as heterosexuals.” This data highlights that a significant portion of LGB individuals remains unmarried, in contrast to heterosexual individuals.

One explanation for this trend is that most LGB individuals belong to younger age groups, which generally have lower marriage rates regardless of sexual orientation. However, another possible factor is that LGB individuals may be less inclined to enter into long-term committed relationships. Studies on same-sex relationships have suggested that homosexual individuals may have a different approach to commitment compared to heterosexuals. Research by various scholars, including D. McWirther and A. Mattison in The Male Couple (1984), M. Xiridou’s study on HIV incidence among homosexual men (AIDS, 2003), and A.P. Bell and M.S. Weinberg’s book Homo-Sexualities: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women (1978), have explored patterns of relationship stability within the LGB community. Additionally, E. Goode and R. Troiden’s study, Correlates and Accompaniments of Promiscuous Sex Among Male Homosexuals (Psychiatry, 1980), analyzed trends in casual and committed relationships among gay men.

In countries where civil unions and same-sex marriage have been legalized, statistics indicate that relatively few LGB individuals opt for formalizing their relationships. This pattern suggests that legal recognition of same-sex unions does not necessarily lead to higher rates of marriage within the LGB community. Instead, it raises questions about whether traditional notions of commitment align with the relationship dynamics observed in same-sex couples.

Ultimately, the data challenges the perception that the rise in LGB identification is purely a result of increased acceptance or the removal of societal barriers. Instead, the figures suggest that sexuality is influenced by cultural shifts and trends. The notion that sexual orientation is an immutable trait is contradicted by the observable increase in LGB identification among younger generations. This discrepancy between age groups and the overall rise in bisexual identification reinforce the argument that sexual orientation is not solely determined by genetics or biological factors but is also shaped by social influences.

Moreover, the statistical trends contradict certain ideological narratives about homosexuality being a stable and unchanging identity. If sexual orientation were entirely innate, then the proportion of LGB individuals should remain consistent across different generations. However, the report indicates that younger generations are significantly more likely to identify as LGB than older generations, pointing toward a cultural rather than a biological explanation.

The fact that most LGB individuals remain unmarried, despite legal opportunities to do so, further supports the notion that traditional relationship structures may not hold the same appeal for same-sex couples. While some may argue that societal attitudes toward same-sex relationships are still evolving, the data suggests that differences in relationship patterns are not merely a result of external pressures but may also be linked to inherent preferences within the LGB community.

In conclusion, the UK population report presents compelling evidence that the rise in LGB identification is a recent phenomenon rather than a fixed biological reality. The increase in bisexuality suggests that many individuals view sexual orientation as a spectrum rather than a rigid category. The disparity in identification between young and old age groups supports the idea that sexuality is influenced by cultural trends and external conditioning rather than being an unchanging, genetic trait. While the debate over nature versus nurture in sexual orientation continues, these statistics highlight that societal influences play a substantial role in shaping how individuals define their sexual identities.

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order, Calls It Unconstitutional

Staff ReporterUSA 0

A second federal judge has indefinitely blocked former President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at restricting birthright citizenship, issuing a strong rebuke of the administration’s attempt to impose such a policy during a court hearing on Thursday.

“It has become ever more apparent that, to our president, the rule of law is but an impediment to his policy goals. The rule of law is, according to him, something to navigate around or simply ignore, whether that be for political or personal gain,” stated U.S. District Judge John Coughenour while delivering his ruling.

Coughenour, who was appointed by former President Ronald Reagan, emphasized his commitment to upholding the legal framework. “Nevertheless, in this courtroom and under my watch, the rule of law is a bright beacon which I intend to follow,” he asserted.

Previously, the judge had issued a temporary halt on Trump’s executive order, but that ruling was set to expire on Thursday after two weeks. This time, he granted a nationwide preliminary injunction, effectively blocking the executive order as requested by four Democratic state attorneys general and a group of private plaintiffs.

Coughenour made his decision after hearing arguments for less than 20 minutes. He referenced his past work in the former Soviet Union to underscore the importance of maintaining judicial independence and legal integrity.

“I said this two weeks ago, and I’ll say it again today: There are moments in the world’s history when people look back and ask, ‘Where were the lawyers, where were the judges?’ In these moments, the rule of law becomes especially vulnerable. I refuse to let that beacon go dark today,” he remarked.

The executive order, signed by Trump on his first day in office, sought to limit birthright citizenship so that it would not apply to children born in the U.S. to parents who lacked permanent legal status. The order was among several immigration-related measures introduced in the administration’s early weeks.

Trump’s policy has already been challenged in nine separate lawsuits, with critics arguing that it contradicts long-standing Supreme Court interpretations of the 14th Amendment’s birthright citizenship guarantee, which has been understood to allow only a few exceptions.

“This case turns on the critical phrase ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ in the Citizenship Clause. On that issue, plaintiffs offer a construction of that phrase that is demonstrably and unequivocally incorrect,” contended Drew Ensign, a deputy assistant attorney general, during Thursday’s hearing.

Coughenour’s decision follows a similar ruling by a federal judge in Maryland on Wednesday, who also issued an injunction against the executive order. Additional hearings related to the issue are scheduled to take place in Boston on Friday and Concord, New Hampshire, on Monday as other lawsuits proceed.

The rulings issued this week will remain in effect indefinitely, preventing the enforcement of Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship until the cases are fully litigated.

However, Coughenour left little doubt regarding his perspective on the legality of the policy.

“The Constitution is not something with which the government may play policy games. If the government wants to change the exceptional American grant of birthright citizenship, it needs to amend the Constitution itself,” he declared.

“That’s how our Constitution works, and that’s how the rule of law works. Because the president’s order attempts to circumscribe this process, it is clearly unconstitutional,” he concluded.

Trump Orders Review and Funding Cuts for Key UN Organizations

Staff ReporterWorld 0

President Donald Trump has issued an Executive Order directing increased scrutiny of three United Nations entities: the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), and the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

The order formally confirms the United States’ withdrawal from the UNHRC and suspends all future financial contributions to UNRWA. Additionally, it calls for an expedited review of UNESCO to examine whether the organization has demonstrated “anti-Israel bias.”

Under the directive, Secretary of State Marco Rubio must also assess and report on “international organizations, conventions, or treaties” that may foster radical ideologies or sentiments deemed “anti-American.”

Raising concerns about UNRWA’s alleged affiliations with terrorist activities, the order claims the agency has engaged in “anti-Semitic and anti-Israel” actions. It refers to reports that certain UNRWA personnel were involved in the October 7th attacks against Israel and highlights the use of the agency’s facilities by Hamas and other militant groups for stockpiling weapons and constructing tunnels.

“UNRWA has reportedly been infiltrated by members of groups long designated by the Secretary of State (Secretary) as foreign terrorist organizations, and UNRWA employees were involved in the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel,” the order states. It further criticizes the UNHRC for providing cover to human rights violators and accuses UNESCO of displaying a persistent anti-Israel stance over the past decade.

The order instructs the Secretary of State to formally inform the UN Secretary-General, as well as the leadership of UNRWA and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, that the U.S. will no longer contribute funds to UNRWA or the UNHRC. Additionally, it declares that the United States will not “satisfy any claims to pay 2025 assessments or prior arrears by these organizations.”

Furthermore, the directive specifies that the U.S. will not take part in the UNHRC’s activities or seek a seat on the Council. The Secretary of State has been tasked with shutting down the Office of the U.S. Representative to the UNHRC and eliminating all associated positions.

Regarding UNESCO, the order mandates a comprehensive review of U.S. membership, which must be completed within 90 days. This assessment will be led by the Secretary of State in coordination with the U.S. Ambassador to the UN.

January 2025 Becomes Hottest on Record, Defying Expectations and Raising Climate Concerns

Staff ReporterEnvironment 0

The past month has officially been the warmest January ever recorded, raising fresh concerns among scientists about the pace of climate change, according to a BBC report.

January 2025 was initially expected to be slightly cooler than the previous year due to a shift in the Pacific’s natural weather cycle away from El Niño. However, contrary to expectations, it surpassed the January 2024 record by nearly 0.1°C, as reported by the European Copernicus climate service.

The ongoing rise in global temperatures is primarily attributed to greenhouse gas emissions from human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels. Despite this, scientists acknowledge they are still unable to fully explain why January 2025 experienced such an intense spike in heat.

This continues a trend of unexpected temperature surges observed since mid-2023, with temperatures exceeding previous projections by approximately 0.2°C.

“The basic reason we’re having records being broken, and we’ve had this decades-long warming trend, is because we’re increasing the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere,” said Gavin Schmidt, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, in a statement to BBC News.

He further explained that while the overall warming trend is well understood, the specifics behind why 2023, 2024, and now the beginning of 2025 have been exceptionally warm remain unclear. “The specifics of exactly why 2023, and 2024, and [the start of] 2025, were so warm, there are other elements involved there. We’re trying to pin those down,” Schmidt added.

Data from the European Copernicus climate service illustrates this trend through a bar chart showing global average January temperatures from 1940 to 2025. The chart reveals a clear upward trajectory, with January 2025 registering the highest global average temperature of 1.75°C above pre-industrial levels, marginally surpassing the 2024 record. The visual representation also indicates that as the years have gotten hotter, the color of the bars has progressively darkened to deeper shades of red.

In absolute terms, January 2025 ended up 1.75°C warmer than the late 19th century, a period before human activities had a significant impact on the climate.

The warming trend early last year was partially influenced by the El Niño phenomenon, a natural climate pattern where abnormally warm ocean surface waters spread across the eastern tropical Pacific. This event releases excess heat into the atmosphere, further elevating global temperatures.

In contrast, La Niña conditions, which tend to have a cooling effect, are now developing, according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Scientists expected this shift to lead to a slight drop in temperatures.

Currently, La Niña remains weak, and its full impact on global temperatures can take a few months to manifest. Even with this transition underway, experts anticipated that January 2025 would be cooler than January 2024.

“If you’d asked me a few months ago what January 2025 would look like relative to January 2024, my best shot would have been it would be cooler,” said Adam Scaife, head of monthly to decadal predictions at the UK Met Office.

He admitted that the reality has proven otherwise, and researchers are still struggling to understand the reasons behind this unexpected warmth. “We now know it isn’t, and we don’t really know why that is,” Scaife acknowledged.

USCIS Announces FY 2026 H-1B Cap Registration Period and Process Enhancements

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that the initial registration period for the fiscal year 2026 H-1B cap will begin at noon Eastern on March 7, 2025, and will conclude at noon Eastern on March 24, 2025. During this timeframe, prospective petitioners and their representatives must electronically register each beneficiary through a USCIS online account and submit the necessary registration fee.

To participate in the selection process, those seeking H-1B visas must complete the online registration using a USCIS account and pay a registration fee of $215 for each submission. This fee applies to every individual beneficiary registered under the program.

Employers who intend to file H-1B petitions but do not have a USCIS online account must establish an organizational account before proceeding. For employers who previously held an H-1B registrant account for the FY 2021 through FY 2024 registration periods but did not use it for FY 2025, their existing accounts will be automatically converted into organizational accounts upon their next login. First-time registrants can create an account at any time. Additional information, including instructional videos, can be found on the Organizational Accounts Frequently Asked Questions page, which will be updated with FY 2026 registration details before the opening of the registration period.

Legal representatives are permitted to add clients to their accounts at any time. However, both representatives and registrants must wait until March 7, 2025, to enter beneficiary details and submit the registration with the applicable fee. The selection process takes place after the registration period ends, meaning there is no need to register on the first day of the window.

For FY 2026, USCIS will continue using the beneficiary-centric selection process that was implemented in FY 2025. Under this system, selections are made based on unique beneficiaries rather than individual registrations. If USCIS receives a sufficient number of registrations for unique beneficiaries by March 24, it will conduct a random selection process and notify users of their selection status through their USCIS online accounts. If the number of unique beneficiary registrations falls short, all properly submitted registrations during the initial period will be selected. By March 31, USCIS plans to inform prospective petitioners and representatives if at least one of their registrations has been selected.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury has approved a temporary increase in the daily credit card transaction limit to accommodate the anticipated volume of H-1B registrations. The limit, which was previously set at $24,999.99 per day, has been raised to $99,999.99 per day for the FY 2026 H-1B cap season. This change addresses past issues where daily credit card limits were exceeded due to high registration volumes. Payments exceeding $99,999.99 may be made through Automated Clearing House (ACH) transfers, though users are advised to check with their banks to remove any potential ACH transaction blocks beforehand. USCIS will provide additional guidance regarding payment procedures before the registration period begins.

To be eligible to file an H-1B cap-subject petition—including petitions for beneficiaries eligible for the advanced degree exemption—petitioners must ensure that the beneficiary named in their petition was selected during the H-1B registration process. Further details about the electronic registration process are available on the H-1B Electronic Registration Process page.

Organizational Account Enhancements for FY 2026

For the FY 2026 H-1B filing season, USCIS has introduced several improvements to organizational and representative accounts to streamline the registration and petitioning process. These enhancements include:

  • Paralegals can work with multiple legal representatives: Paralegals will now be able to accept invitations from multiple legal representative accounts. This update enables them to assist different attorneys in preparing H-1B registrations, Form I-129 H-1B petitions, and Form I-907 requests for premium processing using a single paralegal account.
  • Simplified process for adding paralegals to company client accounts: Legal representatives will now have an easier way to add paralegals to assist with H-1B filings for company clients.
  • Pre-population of Form I-129 fields: Certain fields in Form I-129 will be automatically pre-filled based on selected H-1B registrations, reducing data entry errors and improving efficiency.
  • Spreadsheet upload functionality for beneficiary data: Employers and legal representatives will have the option to prepare an H-1B beneficiary data spreadsheet and upload it to pre-populate registration information, further streamlining the process.

These system improvements are scheduled to go live before the initial registration period opens in March 2025, ensuring that prospective petitioners and legal representatives can take full advantage of the enhanced features.

Malayalam Film Industry to Halt Operations from June 1 Over Financial Crisis

Staff ReporterCinema 0

Various associations within the Malayalam film industry have jointly decided to cease all activities, including film production and screenings, starting June 1. This decision follows extensive discussions on the growing financial distress in the industry.

Announcing the shutdown in Kochi, prominent producer G. Suresh Kumar highlighted the dire situation, emphasizing the severe losses that have plagued filmmakers. “This industry is already in the doldrums with film after film bombing at the box office, leaving the producers in a quandary,” he stated.

A major concern raised by Kumar is the heavy taxation imposed on the industry. “There is no industry which is being taxed at 30 per cent, and it includes GST besides additional entertainment tax. The government has to step in and withdraw this,” he demanded. Kumar, who is the father of National Award-winning actress Keerthi Suresh, stressed that such tax burdens are making film production increasingly unviable.

Another significant issue affecting the industry is the skyrocketing remuneration of actors and crew members. According to Kumar, this has created an unsustainable financial structure for producers. “The remuneration of actors and others has skyrocketed like never before, and it has to be scaled down. 60 per cent of the cost of a film is gobbled up by remuneration to the actors, which is hugely detrimental to a producer. They (actors) have no concern for this, and we just cannot go forward in this manner,” he explained. Kumar’s wife, Maneka, was a popular actress in the past, giving him deep insight into the industry’s changing dynamics.

Kumar pointed out that even newcomers in the industry demand exorbitant fees, further burdening film budgets. “Even the new actors charge a hefty fee, and so is the same with directors too. A film that can be finished in 50 days gets over in 150 days. Not even 10 per cent is recovered from the theatres compared to the remuneration of the actors. We will not cooperate with the films produced by the actors,” he asserted.

The financial crisis is further highlighted by the staggering number of box office failures in recent times. Kumar revealed that in the past year alone, 176 Malayalam films failed commercially. He also provided alarming figures regarding theatre losses in early 2025. “During January 2025, the loss for the theatres alone was Rs 101 crore,” he stated, indicating the industry’s worsening financial health.

The situation has also severely impacted the livelihoods of those working behind the scenes in the industry. “As many as 60 per cent of the film industry professionals who make a living working behind the screens are in dire straits,” Kumar said, underscoring the crisis that has left thousands struggling.

Another challenge is the uncertain revenue stream from OTT platforms. Previously, streaming services provided a crucial financial cushion for filmmakers, but that support has diminished significantly. Kumar explained that unless a film performs well in theatres, OTT platforms are hesitant to offer substantial deals. “The state government is silent, and presently, the situation is that the OTT market has dried up. If a film is received well at the box office, then the OTT market offers a sum… to receive the committed amount, it takes six to ten months,” he explained.

With such pressing concerns, the decision to halt industry operations is seen as an urgent move to force action from stakeholders, including the government and industry professionals. The coming weeks will determine whether negotiations can lead to relief measures or if the shutdown will prolong the crisis.

Pope Francis Meets Shaolin Monks at the Vatican Following Global Meditation Forum

Staff ReporterReligion 0

On the morning of February 1, Pope Francis welcomed a delegation of monks from the Shaolin Temple at the Vatican. The Shaolin Temple, an important site in the history of Buddhism in China, is renowned for its preservation of Zen Buddhist traditions. Photos published by the VaticanNews website depicted the pontiff meeting with the monks from Henan province in his study.

This meeting followed the Future World Chan Forum, which was held at the Shaolin Temple from January 19 to 22. The forum gathered spiritual leaders and scholars from across the world to explore ways of promoting meditation for personal well-being and fostering harmonious international relations. Among the notable attendees at the event in China was Al-Azhar Grand Imam Ahmed Al-Tayeb, who spoke about the significance of the 2019 Declaration on Human Fraternity, a document he co-signed with Pope Francis.

The Shaolin Monastery is widely recognized in the West for its association with kung fu, a martial art that continues to be practiced by its monks. However, beyond martial arts, the temple holds a deep-rooted significance as a guardian of Zen Buddhism in China. It is located on the slopes of Mount Song, one of China’s five sacred mountains, and has a long history dating back to the 5th century AD.

The origins of the Shaolin Temple can be traced to an Indian monk named Bada, the 28th successor in a lineage of Buddhist religious leaders. Bada arrived in China and began disseminating Buddhist teachings. In AD 495, Emperor Wei Xiaowendi ordered the construction of the temple, which played a pivotal role in the translation of sacred Indian Buddhist texts into Chinese. These translations helped shape what are now recognized as the fundamental precepts of Zen Buddhism.

Over the years, the Shaolin Temple has gained worldwide recognition, and in 2010, it was designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site. However, the temple has also faced criticism due to its increasing popularity as a tourist destination and its strong association with kung fu. In response, the monks emphasize that martial arts represent only one aspect of their cultural and spiritual traditions. They also highlight the global reach of their teachings, noting that over 200 Shaolin-affiliated centers exist worldwide, attracting more than 100 million visitors.

A new three-story museum is currently under construction at the Shaolin Temple and is expected to open this year. The museum’s first floor will focus on the life of Monk Bada and the foundations of Zen Buddhism. The second floor will present a detailed account of Shaolin history and culture through historical artifacts, documents, and digital exhibits. The top floor will display an extensive collection of the temple’s artistic and cultural heritage, including inscriptions, sculptures, murals, paintings, and calligraphy.

A Triumph of Harmony: Celebrating Chandrika Tandon’s Grammy Win

Staff ReporterEntertainment 0

The world has long known Chandrika Tandon as a visionary—an artist whose music transcends borders, a leader whose generosity uplifts communities, and a soul whose very presence radiates warmth. With her Grammy Award win for Triveni, she has once again shined a spotlight on the power of music to heal, unite, and inspire.

The Indo-American Arts Council (IAAC), which has long cherished Tandon as both an artistic force and a dear patron, celebrates this moment with immense pride. Her unwavering support of IAAC’s programming has enriched the arts in countless ways, and we had the distinct honor of hosting a book talk for her deeply personal work, Ammu’s Treasures, inspired by the songs she sings to her grandchildren.

“Chandrika Tandon’s Grammy win is a testament to her unparalleled artistry and her ability to elevate Indian classical music on the global stage,” said Rakesh Kaul, Vice Chairman of IAAC. “Her work embodies the essence of cultural harmony, and we are thrilled to see her receive this well-deserved recognition.”

“Chandrika’s music is one for the soul. Beautifully blending ancient healing chants with Western elements, she creates something divine that transcends boundaries, touching hearts across the world. This Grammy is not just a personal achievement but a celebration of the rich cultural heritage she represents,” added Suman Gollamudi, IAAC’s Executive Director.

There are artists, and then there are those rare luminaries who make the world brighter simply by being in it. Chandrika Tandon is one of them. Her Grammy win is not just a recognition of musical excellence—it is a reminder that passion, purpose, and generosity can transform lives.

 

The IAAC, along with admirers across the globe, stands in awe of her brilliance and rejoices in this well-deserved honor.

International Criminal Court Defiant as Trump Imposes Sanctions on Officials

Staff ReporterWorld 0

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has reaffirmed its commitment to judicial independence despite sanctions imposed by former US President Donald Trump. The court condemned Trump’s executive order, stating it was designed to undermine its “independent and impartial” judicial processes.

The order follows the ICC’s issuance of an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over alleged war crimes in Gaza, charges Israel has denied. The court also issued a warrant for a senior Hamas commander. Trump’s order accuses the ICC of engaging in “illegitimate and baseless actions,” arguing its recent decisions set a “dangerous precedent” that could expose Americans to “harassment, abuse, and possible arrest.”

As a global tribunal, the ICC has jurisdiction over genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. While more than 120 countries, including the UK and European nations, are members, the US and Israel have never joined.

In response to the sanctions, the ICC released a statement condemning the executive order. “The ICC condemns the issuance by the US of an executive order seeking to impose sanctions on its officials and harm its independent and impartial judicial work,” it said. The court also emphasized its mission to provide justice, stating it remains committed “to continue providing justice and hope to millions of innocent victims of atrocities across the world.”

The court has previously issued arrest warrants for world leaders, including Russian President Vladimir Putin for alleged war crimes in Ukraine, Taliban figures for “persecuting Afghan girls and women,” and Myanmar’s military leader for crimes against the Rohingya Muslims.

In Netanyahu’s case, ICC judges determined that there were “reasonable grounds” to believe that he, along with former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and Hamas commander Mohammed Deif—who died last year—bore “criminal responsibility for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.”

However, the White House rejected the court’s actions, with a memo circulated on Thursday accusing the ICC of drawing a “shameful moral equivalency” between Israel and Hamas by issuing the warrants simultaneously.

Trump’s order also claims the ICC’s actions “threaten to infringe upon the sovereignty of the United States” and “undermine” US national security and foreign policy.

The sanctions specifically target individuals who assist ICC investigations involving US citizens or allies, restricting their financial transactions and travel. The timing of the move, which coincided with Netanyahu’s visit to the US, has drawn criticism from multiple allies, including the Netherlands and Germany.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesperson reaffirmed Britain’s stance, stating that the UK supports the ICC’s independence.

The United Nations also condemned the order, calling for it to be reversed. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the court’s crucial role, posting on X (formerly Twitter) that the ICC “must be able to freely pursue the fight against global impunity.”

Conversely, Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Saar praised Trump’s decision. “I strongly commend President Trump’s executive order,” he wrote on X, calling the ICC’s actions “immoral” and claiming they lacked “legal basis.”

Hungary also backed Trump’s stance. Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said on Facebook that the order was “absolutely understandable,” alleging that the ICC had become a “biased political tool.” Hungary has faced criticism for maintaining ties with Russia despite the invasion of Ukraine and has invited Netanyahu to visit even after the ICC issued his arrest warrant.

Experts warn that the sanctions could have a major impact on the ICC’s operations. Zachary Kaufman, a former clerk for the court’s first chief prosecutor, told the BBC World Service that “the sanctions… do have the potential of freezing property and assets, as well as suspending entry into the United States of ICC officials and their immediate family members.”

The US has long rejected the ICC’s jurisdiction over its citizens and officials. Washington has accused the court of constraining Israel’s right to self-defense while failing to prosecute Iran and anti-Israel groups.

During his first term, Trump imposed similar sanctions on ICC officials investigating alleged US war crimes in Afghanistan. The measures included travel bans and asset freezes on then-chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda. These were later lifted by President Joe Biden’s administration.

Despite Trump’s latest order, efforts to sanction the ICC remain stalled in Congress. Last month, the US House of Representatives passed a bill seeking to impose penalties on the court, but the legislation failed in the Senate.

Meanwhile, some countries have moved to reinforce the ICC’s authority. In response to what they view as attacks on the court, nine nations, including South Africa and Malaysia, formed the “Hague Group” last month to support the ICC and its rulings.

Before leaving office, President Biden also criticized the ICC’s decision to issue an arrest warrant for Netanyahu. He labeled the move “outrageous” and rejected any comparison between Israel and Hamas.

Trump’s order maintains that “both nations [the US and Israel] are thriving democracies with militaries that strictly adhere to the laws of war.”

The ICC prosecutor’s case against Netanyahu and Gallant found “reasonable grounds to believe” they bear criminal responsibility as co-perpetrators for multiple offenses, including “the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare” and “the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts.” Additionally, it found “reasonable grounds” that both leaders were responsible for directing attacks against civilians.

Trump’s executive order follows his controversial proposal to “take over” Gaza and resettle Palestinians elsewhere. During a joint press conference with Netanyahu, he claimed his plan would transform Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East.” After widespread condemnation from Arab leaders and the UN, he reiterated the proposal on his Truth Social platform on Thursday.

Modi to Visit US, Meet Trump Amid Trade and Immigration Discussions

Staff ReporterWorld 0

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to visit the United States next week for a meeting with President Donald Trump, according to a statement from the White House.

Reports indicate that Modi will also attend a dinner hosted by the US president during his two-day visit. However, the exact dates of the official working visit have not yet been disclosed.

The Indian leader will be one of the first foreign dignitaries to meet Trump at the White House following the start of his second term. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is currently in Washington, while Japan’s Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is expected to arrive later this week.

During Trump’s first term, he and Modi shared a strong rapport. Last week, the two leaders engaged in what the White House described as a “productive” phone conversation, discussing issues such as illegal immigration, security, and trade relations.

Analysts believe it will be crucial to see whether this cordial relationship can help resolve concerns regarding trade disputes and immigration policies.

Trump, who has praised Modi as a “great leader,” has also criticized India over its trade practices, particularly its tariffs. Last year, he accused India of imposing excessive tariffs on US goods.

The confirmation of Modi’s visit to Washington comes shortly after a US military flight carrying around 100 deported Indian nationals landed in Punjab.

Reports suggest that those deported had either entered the US illegally or overstayed their visas.

During their phone conversation last week, Trump expressed confidence that India “will do the right thing” regarding illegal immigration.

Deportation of undocumented foreign nationals has been a central aspect of Trump’s policy. According to a Bloomberg report, 18,000 undocumented Indian migrants have been identified in the US, though experts believe the actual number may be higher.

A study by the Pew Research Center estimated that the number of undocumented Indian immigrants in the US stood at approximately 725,000 last year.

Thus far, India has managed to avoid facing direct US tariffs on its exports.

However, Trump has previously described India as the “tariff king” and a “big abuser” of trade relations. He has warned of reciprocal actions if India does not lower its taxes on American imports.

In an attempt to ease tensions, India’s latest budget included reductions in duties on various products, including high-end motorcycles like Harley-Davidson.

India’s finance secretary emphasized that this decision demonstrated the country was “not a tariff king.”

Last week, the Indian foreign ministry affirmed that efforts were underway to strengthen bilateral ties between the two nations.

India’s Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar represented the country at Trump’s inauguration ceremony and held discussions with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio while visiting Washington.

Following Trump’s re-election victory in November, Jaishankar stated that India had no concerns about collaborating with the US administration.

Chandrika Tandon Wins 2025 Grammy for Best New Age Album

Staff ReporterWomen 0

South Asian American singer, songwriter, and producer Chandrika Tandon has secured the 2025 Grammy Award for her album Triveni in the category of Best New Age, Ambient, or Chant Album. This achievement marks her first Grammy win and her second nomination, further solidifying her presence in the realm of spiritual and healing music.

A pioneering collaboration, Triveni unites Tandon with Grammy-winning South African flutist Wouter Kellerman and Japanese American cellist Eru Matsumoto. The album offers a deeply meditative experience by merging ancient mantras with the calming melodies of flute and cello, effectively bridging different musical cultures and traditions. Reflecting on the power of music, Tandon shared upon receiving the award, “Music is love, music ignites the light within all of us, and, even in our darkest days, music spreads joy and laughter.” She also extended her appreciation to her fellow nominees, adding, “Congratulations to all the other nominees in our category. Thank you for the music, and thank you for each and everyone that creates and supports the music; may all our lives be enveloped in love, light, and laughter.”

For years, Tandon has been integrating Sanskrit chants with Western musical elements, particularly for large choral groups. Her compositions have gained prominence, with performances at distinguished venues such as the World Cultural Festival and Lincoln Center. Additionally, she serves as an Artist in Residence for the Young People’s Chorus of New York City and has been awarded a New York State Council on the Arts grant to compose Sanskrit chant pieces for choral ensembles.

Beyond her musical accomplishments, Tandon is also widely recognized as a philanthropist, business leader, and humanitarian. Her efforts are aimed at enhancing human happiness through both music and education. She has released six albums through her Soul Chants Music label and has performed at prestigious locations, including the Kennedy Center, Lincoln Center, Times Square, and Washington, D.C.’s National Mall.

Tandon has also made significant strides in the corporate world. She became the first South Asian American woman to be elected partner at McKinsey & Company and later founded Tandon Capital Associates. In addition, she chairs the Krishnamurthy Tandon Foundation, which supports various philanthropic endeavors. She is a trustee of New York University and chairs the NYU Tandon School of Engineering, contributing extensively to business and community education initiatives.

Her achievements have earned her numerous accolades, including the Ellis Island Medal of Honor, NYU’s Gallatin Medal, and The Town Hall’s Friend of the Arts Award. These honors highlight her enduring impact as both an artist and a leader dedicated to fostering education and culture through her work.

About Chandrika Tandon

Chandrika Tandon is an acclaimed musician, business executive, and philanthropist devoted to the transformative power of music and education. Through her label, Soul Chants Music, she creates music rooted in ancient traditions that resonate with audiences worldwide. Her work extends across music, business, and philanthropy, inspiring people globally.

GOPIO Chambers of Commerce and Industry Hosts Networking Luncheon with Tech Leaders and Investors

Staff ReporterCommunity 0

The GOPIO Chambers of Commerce and Industry (GCCI) organized a Networking Luncheon Meeting on February 1 in Manhattan, bringing together new technology companies and investors. The event featured London-based guest speaker Raj Lakha.

Braj Aggarwal, a GOPIO Life Member, hosted the luncheon and welcomed attendees to the networking session. He also offered his office conference room for future GOPIO and GCCI seminar sessions.

The program commenced with a formal address by GOPIO International Chairman Dr. Thomas Abraham, who encouraged participants to become members of GCCI. “GOPIO Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI) will connect small and medium businesses of the Diaspora locally and internationally, and it is a great opportunity for them to network,” Dr. Abraham stated.

He further emphasized that “as a prelude to the convention, GCCI is providing a platform in different cities for technology startups, entrepreneurs, and investors.”

Newly elected GOPIO International President Prakash Shah extended an invitation to the GOPIO Convention in Brisbane, Australia, scheduled for March 28-30, 2025. He highlighted the theme, “The Diaspora’s Role in Shaping Future Technologies,” noting that the event provides a valuable opportunity for members of the Indian Diaspora to visit that region and network with the community there.

Conference sessions at the convention will align with the broader theme and cover a range of emerging technologies. Topics will include Artificial Intelligence (AI), Quantum Computing, the Internet of Things (IoT), Nanotechnology, Advanced Materials, Electronic and Photonic Devices, Pharmaceuticals, Food Supplements, Medical Devices, Biomedical Innovations, Energy Generation and Storage Devices, and nano-bio-convergence technologies.

Raj Lakha, the guest speaker for the luncheon, is a London-based investor with stakes in several technology companies, including Holoxica.com, promake.com, unicatchup.com, and valenspay.com. Specializing in private equity, corporate finance, and Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects, Lakha stressed the significance of investing in technological solutions that enhance longevity and health through innovations in life sciences.

“The future of technology is investing in solutions that increase Longevity of Health using innovations in life sciences,” Lakha said.

He further explained that “sectors such as Longevity Medicine, AI, Nanotech, Fintech et al will provide Indian Diaspora community members with opportunities not seen before.”

Lakha also expressed his support for the initiatives of Dr. Abraham and Mr. Shah by proposing the development of several projects, including a “GOPIO Bank” with debit and credit card services, “GOPIO TV online,” and the establishment of a GOPIO Chamber of Commerce office in London. “This will hopefully encourage younger PIOs/NRIs to join GOPIO,” Lakha added.

GCCI is actively expanding worldwide and encourages interested individuals to open new chapters in their cities. Those interested in establishing a chapter can contact Prakash Shah at 908-267-5021 or Sid Jain at 201-889-8888.

Shehbaz Sharif Calls for Dialogue with India to Resolve Kashmir Issue

Staff ReporterIndia 0

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif stated on Wednesday that Islamabad seeks to settle all outstanding issues with India, including Kashmir, through dialogue.

Speaking at a special session of the Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) legislative assembly in Muzaffarabad on “Kashmir Solidarity Day,” Sharif urged India to honor its commitments to the United Nations and engage in discussions.

Kashmir Solidarity Day is an annual observance in Pakistan meant to express support for the Kashmiri people. “We want all issues, including Kashmir, to be resolved through talks,” Sharif said.

The Pakistani leader further remarked, “India should come out of the thinking of August 5, 2019, and fulfil promises made to the UN and launch a dialogue.” His statement referred to India’s revocation of Article 370, which had granted Jammu and Kashmir special status before the region was reorganized into two Union Territories.

‘Peace is the Way to Progress’

Sharif cited the Lahore Declaration of 1999, an agreement signed by then-Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee during his visit to Pakistan, as evidence that dialogue was the only viable path forward for the two nations.

India has consistently maintained that it seeks normal neighborly relations with Pakistan but insists that such relations must be built in an environment free of terrorism, hostility, and violence.

New Delhi has also made it clear to Pakistan that Jammu and Kashmir, along with Ladakh, “was, is and shall forever” remain an integral part of India. Relations between the two countries worsened following the revocation of Article 370.

Sharif also criticized India for accumulating weapons, arguing that stockpiling arms would not bring peace or alter the lives of Kashmiris. He urged New Delhi to adopt a wiser approach, stating that peace was essential for progress.

“Pakistan will continue to offer its unwavering moral, diplomatic, and political support to the Kashmiri people till the realization of their right to self-determination,” he said. He further asserted, “The only solution to the Kashmir issue is the right of self-determination under the UNSC resolution.”

Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Sharif also called on the international community to pressure India into allowing Kashmiris “to freely determine their future for lasting peace in the region.”

Additionally, PoK’s “prime minister” Anwarul Haq reaffirmed that Pakistan was the ultimate destination for Kashmiris, adding that true peace could not be achieved without resolving the Kashmir issue.

At the event, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff committee, the service chiefs, and the Pakistan armed forces reiterated their support for the Kashmiri people.

Trump Expands Executive Power as Musk Moves to Overhaul USAID

Staff ReporterUSA 0

President Donald Trump has taken steps to freeze hundreds of billions of dollars in federal funds and has allowed billionaire ally Elon Musk access to sensitive Treasury payment systems responsible for handling trillions of dollars. Additionally, Trump and his administration have removed agency watchdogs, top FBI officials, and federal prosecutors who played roles in investigating the January 6 Capitol riot.

Now, Trump and Musk are focused on dismantling the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which provides tens of billions in congressionally approved aid to foreign allies each year.

Each of these moves touches areas where Congress traditionally holds authority or oversight. Yet, Trump has bypassed lawmakers at every turn.

Having returned to the White House two weeks ago, Trump—who won the popular vote for the first time—is now asserting his executive power to shrink the government and eliminate officials he sees as disloyal.

Historically, lawmakers have viewed their oversight powers and control of federal spending as key responsibilities in Washington’s balance of power. However, in Trump’s second administration, congressional Republicans have largely deferred to him, recognizing his influence over their voter base.

Despite once criticizing executive overreach under Democratic presidents, Republicans, who now control both chambers of Congress, have remained passive as Trump implements controversial and legally questionable executive actions. Instead, they have largely cheered on his efforts to disrupt Washington and challenge the country’s system of checks and balances.

Senator Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, acknowledged that past Democratic presidents have also tested the limits of their authority. “They’re going to see how far they can go,” Tillis told NBC News regarding Trump’s administration. “I don’t begrudge them for doing it.”

Still, he suggested it would be better if Trump sought congressional approval before refusing to spend congressionally mandated funds, such as those allocated for USAID. “I think it’s legitimate; it’s just not going to last long-term if it doesn’t make sense,” said Tillis, who is up for re-election next year.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, defended Trump’s actions at a recent gathering of House Republicans at Trump’s golf club near Miami. “He’s been using his executive authority, I think, in an appropriate manner,” Johnson said. “He got a mandate from the American people. Let’s not forget he ran on restoring common sense and fiscal sanity and ensuring that the government would be more efficient. It was a major theme of the campaign.”

However, some Republicans have raised concerns, particularly about Trump’s efforts to dismantle USAID.

Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska, expressed reservations, saying, “I am concerned about—I have questions about the legality.”

She also described the generally muted response among congressional Republicans to Trump’s executive actions. “We’re all kind of getting into the mode of: Things happen, the news drops, and there’s this explosive reaction, and then you find out that, OK, well, we’re narrowing the order or, well, there’s not really going to be tariffs,” Murkowski said. “And so I think we’re all just kind of processing and figuring out the appropriate response.”

With the exception of quietly blocking former Representative Matt Gaetz’s bid for attorney general, Senate Republicans have largely supported Trump’s nominations, despite pressure from his allies to back picks such as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. More contentious nominations are ahead, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for health and human services secretary and Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence.

Musk and Trump Target USAID

On Monday, Musk announced that the government efficiency department Trump put him in charge of was “shutting down USAID.” Agency employees were informed they would not be allowed to enter their Washington headquarters and should instead work remotely. Later, Trump accused USAID of engaging in “fraud” and appointed Secretary of State Marco Rubio as its acting administrator.

Rubio notified Congress that “a review of USAID’s foreign assistance activities is underway with an eye towards potential reorganization,” according to a State Department statement.

Rubio, during a visit to El Salvador on Monday, criticized USAID, saying, “It’s been 20 or 30 years where people tried to reform it, and it refuses to reform. It refuses to cooperate. When we were in Congress, we couldn’t even get answers to basic questions about programs… That’s not going to continue.”

When asked whether Trump could dismantle USAID without congressional approval, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota, declined to criticize the president. Instead, he echoed Rubio’s concerns about USAID’s transparency. “I think it’s a lot more about finding out how the dollars are being spent, where they’re going, and whether or not they’re consistent with the administration and our country’s priorities when it comes to our national interests,” Thune said.

Trump has also fired 18 independent inspectors general, who were tasked with investigating fraud, waste, and abuse in federal agencies. Democrats and Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, argued that Trump’s move violated a law requiring the president to give Congress 30 days’ notice before removing an inspector general and to provide justification for the dismissal.

Still, Grassley remained largely supportive of Trump, stating, “There may be good reason the IGs were fired. We need to know that if so.”

Last week, congressional Republicans appeared unprepared when the Trump White House unilaterally paused all federal loans and grants—previously approved by Congress—to review whether the funds were supporting initiatives the administration opposed. While GOP leaders ultimately supported the planned funding freeze, a federal judge temporarily blocked it, though U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan noted on Monday that some forms of federal aid still seem to be frozen.

Democrats Push Back

With Republicans holding majorities in both chambers, they could investigate and subpoena Trump officials. However, for now, such action appears unlikely. Instead, Republicans are working with Trump to pass his legislative priorities, including expanding energy production, tightening border security, and cutting taxes.

As a result, Democrats have taken up the fight against Trump’s actions.

On Monday, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York announced that Democrats would introduce legislation “to prevent unlawful access” to the Treasury payment system, which contains confidential information related to Social Security, Medicare, taxpayers, businesses, and federal contractors. The proposal will serve as a test of whether Republicans are willing to limit Trump’s actions.

Senator Ed Markey, a Democrat from Massachusetts, called for Democrats to “fight back” against Trump and Musk, urging them to block all future nominees. Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii, a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, which oversees USAID and the State Department, threatened to place a “blanket hold” on all of Trump’s State Department nominees in response to the USAID controversy.

“Dismantling USAID is illegal and makes us less safe. USAID was created by federal law and is funded by Congress. Donald Trump and Elon Musk can’t just wish it away with a stroke of a pen—they need to pass a law,” Schatz said in a statement.

Senator Chris Coons, a moderate Democrat from Delaware, warned of broader consequences if Trump succeeds in eliminating USAID. “There’s some disagreement about USAID,” he said. “But the much more fundamental fight is over whether an agreement in appropriations that is a law will be respected and can hold.”

On Monday, a group of House and Senate Democrats attempted to enter USAID’s headquarters at the Ronald Reagan Building but were blocked. Outside, they expressed solidarity with USAID employees and condemned Musk’s role in dismantling the agency.

“We are going to fight in every way we can—in the courts, in public opinion, with the bully pulpit, in the halls of Congress, and here at AID itself,” said Representative Gerry Connolly of Virginia, the new top Democrat on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which represents thousands of federal workers.

Overhauling USAID, he added, is “a matter for Congress to deal with—not an unelected billionaire oligarch named Elon Musk.”

US Military Aircraft Deports Illegal Indian Immigrants Amid Social Media Outrage

Staff ReporterImmigration 0

A United States military aircraft transporting illegal Indian immigrants arrived in Amritsar this afternoon, marking the first deportation of its kind since Donald Trump’s second term began. The aircraft, operated by the US Air Force, departed from San Antonio, Texas, and landed at Shri Guru Ramdas Ji International Airport in Punjab’s Amritsar.

Shortly after reports of the deportation emerged, images purportedly depicting the Indian immigrants in handcuffs began circulating on social media. These pictures fueled widespread outrage, as they appeared to show detainees in restraints, including handcuffs and ankle chains. Some images depicted men with their hands cuffed behind their backs, their faces obscured by masks, while others showed individuals sitting with their ankles chained together.

Social media users reacted strongly to these images. One user on X expressed shock, stating, “Handcuffed and chained by the legs, Indians are returning to Amrit Kaal. I have never seen this sight ever!” Another post condemned the perceived treatment of the deportees, saying, “Indians clearly are treated here like prisoners while they are not only handcuffed but also leg cuffed while they are being deported from USA by Trump.”

Clarification on Viral Images

However, a fact-check by HT.com using reverse image search revealed that these images were not related to the Indian immigrants deported from Texas to Amritsar today. Instead, the pictures actually depicted migrants deported from the United States to Guatemala on January 30.

The photograph showing men sitting with their ankles chained was originally published by the Associated Press (AP) five days ago. The AP caption for the image read, “U.S. Air Force jet with migrants bound at their wrists and ankles departed Texas for Guatemala on Thursday, carrying 80 deportees in another deportation flight that reflects a growing role for the armed forces in helping enforce immigration laws.”

Additionally, AP reported that “The Trump administration has used military aircraft to deport people to Guatemala, Ecuador, and Colombia, a departure from U.S.” This indicates that the images making rounds on social media were misattributed to the recent Indian deportation case.

Exit Polls Indicate BJP’s Potential Return to Power in Delhi After 27 Years

Staff ReporterIndia 0

Exit polls for the 2025 Delhi Assembly elections indicate that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is on the brink of a major comeback, potentially reclaiming power in the capital after nearly three decades. At the same time, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), which has ruled Delhi since 2015, appears to be falling short of a decisive majority. The Delhi Assembly consists of 70 seats, with a majority requiring at least 36. The latest exit poll results hint at a possible shift in the city’s political landscape.

Exit Poll Projections

Several agencies have released exit poll results, each predicting varying seat tallies for the three major political parties contesting the election. Below is a summary of their forecasts:

Exit Poll BJP (Likely Seats) AAP (Likely Seats) Congress (Likely Seats)
Chanakya Strategies 39-44 25-28 2-3
Matrize 35-40 32-37 0-1
P-Marq 39-44 21-31 0-1
People’s Pulse 51-60 10-18 0-1
People’s Insight 40-44 25-28 0-1
Poll Diary 42-50 18-25 0-2
JVC 39-45 22-31 0-2

 

The exit polls collectively suggest that the BJP could secure between 39 and 60 seats, indicating a clear advantage for the party in most projections. The AAP is predicted to win between 18 and 37 seats, a significant decline from its 2020 performance. Meanwhile, the Congress is expected to continue its marginal presence, with most estimates giving it no more than three seats.

BJP’s Potential Comeback and AAP’s Confidence

The projections mark a potential turning point in Delhi’s political landscape, with the BJP seemingly poised for a return to power. However, AAP leaders remain hopeful that the final results will paint a different picture. Sushil Gupta, a senior AAP leader, has reaffirmed the party’s belief in a favorable outcome. “Arvind Kejriwal has worked tirelessly for the people of Delhi, and we will see the results in our favor,” Gupta told ANI. An AAP spokesperson echoed this optimism, insisting that the party would secure a decisive majority.

Despite the BJP’s projected lead, exit polls have not always been entirely accurate in Delhi’s past elections.

Historical Accuracy of Exit Polls in Delhi

Exit polls in previous Delhi Assembly elections have had mixed accuracy. In 2013, they correctly predicted a hung assembly, though they underestimated AAP’s breakthrough performance. By 2015, while the exit polls forecasted an AAP victory, they fell short in capturing the extent of the party’s dominance. Most surveys in 2015 estimated AAP would win around 45 seats, but the party ultimately secured an overwhelming 67-seat victory.

In 2020, exit polls improved in precision, correctly predicting AAP’s landslide win, though some projections still underestimated the margin. That year, the AAP won 62 seats, a number that was largely in line with exit poll estimates.

Given this history, while the 2025 exit polls suggest a strong performance for the BJP, past trends indicate that the final results could still hold surprises.

Congress’s Continued Struggles

The Congress, which once held a dominant position in Delhi’s politics, continues to struggle for relevance in the capital. Exit polls suggest that the party may win between zero and three seats, reinforcing its ongoing decline in the city. Once a formidable force, Congress has been unable to regain ground since its defeat in 2013, when AAP emerged as a major political challenger.

Voter Turnout and Changing Sentiments

Voter participation in Delhi has seen fluctuations in recent elections, possibly reflecting evolving political sentiments. The 2020 Delhi Assembly elections recorded a turnout of 62.82%, marking a decline from the 67.47% turnout in 2015. This change in voter engagement could signal shifting priorities among Delhi’s electorate.

The Road Ahead

As Delhi awaits the final election results, the battle for control of the capital remains intense. If the exit polls hold true, the BJP may finally break AAP’s decade-long hold on power, reshaping the political scenario in the city. However, AAP remains confident in its governance record and believes the final outcome will favor them.

The results, expected in the coming days, will determine whether Delhi’s voters have opted for change or chosen continuity.

GOPIO Chamber of Commerce and Industry Hosts Networking Luncheon in Manhattan

Staff ReporterCommunity 0

The GOPIO Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI) organized a networking luncheon on February 1 in Manhattan, bringing together entrepreneurs, investors, and industry leaders. The event underscored GOPIO’s ongoing mission to empower the Indian diaspora, particularly in the ever-evolving technological sector.

As a business and networking platform established by the Global Organization of People of Indian Origin (GOPIO), the GCCI seeks to foster connections among small and medium-sized businesses within the Indian diaspora on both local and international levels.

The luncheon was hosted by GOPIO Life Member Braj Aggarwal, who welcomed participants and provided his office conference room as the venue. He also offered the space for future GOPIO and GCCI seminar sessions. The gathering served as a vital networking opportunity, particularly for emerging technology firms and investors.

GOPIO International Chairman Dr. Thomas Abraham formally opened the event, urging attendees to become part of the newly relaunched GCCI. He stressed the organization’s crucial role in fostering business connections, stating, “GOPIO Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI) will connect small and medium businesses of the Diaspora locally and internationally, and it is a great opportunity for them to network.”

Dr. Abraham also highlighted that the GCCI initiative is creating avenues for technology startups, entrepreneurs, and investors to collaborate ahead of the upcoming GOPIO Convention.

During the event, GOPIO International President Prakash Shah extended an invitation to all attendees for the GOPIO Convention, set to take place in Brisbane, Australia, from March 28 to 30, 2025. He emphasized the convention’s theme, “The Diaspora’s Role in Shaping Future Technologies,” and described it as a unique opportunity for networking and learning about cutting-edge advancements.

The convention will feature discussions on various technological fields, including artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, the Internet of Things (IoT), nanotechnology, advanced materials, electronic and photonic devices, pharmaceuticals, food supplements, medical devices, biomedical innovations, energy generation and storage, and nano-bio convergence technologies.

A highlight of the Manhattan event was a speech by London-based guest speaker Raj Lakha, an experienced investor with stakes in multiple technology ventures. Lakha is a key investor in several technology firms, such as Holoxica.com, Promake.com, Unicatchup.com, and Valenspay.com.

Specializing in private equity, corporate finance, and private-public partnership (PPP) projects, Lakha spoke about the importance of investing in innovations that promote health and longevity. He remarked, “Sectors such as Longevity Medicine, AI, Nanotech, Fintech, et al. will provide Indian diaspora community members with opportunities not seen before.”

In addition to supporting the initiatives led by Abraham and Shah, Lakha proposed establishing new ventures under the GOPIO umbrella. He suggested the creation of a ‘GOPIO Bank’ offering debit and credit card services, as well as ‘GOPIO TV Online’ and a GOPIO Chamber of Commerce office in London.

He further noted, “This will hopefully encourage younger PIOs/NRIs to join GOPIO.”

The luncheon provided an invaluable platform for entrepreneurs, investors, and industry professionals to exchange ideas, build connections, and explore new opportunities within the Indian diaspora’s business and technology sectors.

USCIS Opens H-1B Registration for FY 2026 with System Enhancements and Fee Adjustments

Staff ReporterNews 0

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced the opening of the initial registration period for the fiscal year 2026 H-1B cap. This registration window will commence at noon Eastern Time on March 7, 2025, and conclude at noon Eastern Time on March 24, 2025. During this timeframe, prospective petitioners and their representatives must electronically register each beneficiary through a USCIS online account and pay the designated $215 registration fee.

USCIS has emphasized that those submitting petitions for the H-1B cap or their representatives must complete the registration process electronically within the given timeframe. “Prospective petitioners and their representatives must use a USCIS online account to register each beneficiary electronically for the selection process,” the agency clarified.

For those who do not yet have a USCIS online account, the agency recommends creating an organizational account. Employers who previously had an H-1B registrant account during the fiscal years 2021 to 2024 registration periods but did not utilize it for FY 2025 will find that their accounts will automatically be converted into organizational accounts after their next login. Meanwhile, first-time registrants have the option to create an account at any time. To assist users, additional resources, including step-by-step video guides, will be available on the Organizational Accounts Frequently Asked Questions page. This page will be updated prior to the start of the registration period to provide comprehensive guidance.

Representatives managing H-1B registrations can add clients to their accounts at any time. However, both representatives and registrants must wait until March 7 to enter beneficiary information and officially submit registrations along with the necessary payment. USCIS clarified that there is no advantage to registering on the first day, as selections occur only after the registration window has closed. “Selections take place after the initial registration period closes, so there is no requirement to register on the day the initial registration period opens,” USCIS noted.

For FY 2026, the H-1B cap selection process will continue using the beneficiary-centric model that was introduced in FY 2025. Under this approach, registrations are selected based on unique beneficiaries instead of by individual registrations. If USCIS receives a sufficient number of registrations for unique beneficiaries by the March 24 deadline, a random selection process will be conducted, and notifications will be sent through USCIS online accounts. The agency has set March 31, 2025, as the deadline for announcing selection results.

In response to previous high volumes of H-1B registrations, the U.S. Department of Treasury has approved a temporary increase in the daily credit card transaction limit for H-1B registration payments. The new transaction cap for the FY 2026 season will be $99,999.99 per day, significantly higher than the previous limit of $24,999.99. “Transactions exceeding $99,999.99 may be made via Automated Clearing House (ACH),” USCIS stated. The agency also advised that payors may need to coordinate with their banks in advance to lift any ACH blocks on their accounts to facilitate large transactions.

USCIS has also reiterated that an H-1B petition—including those filed under the advanced degree exemption—can only be submitted by a petitioner whose registration for the beneficiary was selected during the official H-1B registration process.

To improve efficiency and streamline operations for FY 2026, USCIS has introduced several system enhancements for organizational and representative accounts. These upgrades will include the capability for paralegals to collaborate with multiple legal representatives and the introduction of tools that allow certain Form I-129 fields to be automatically pre-populated from selected H-1B registrations. “These enhancements will be live before the start of the initial registration period,” USCIS confirmed.

Trump’s Gaza Plan: A Risky Real Estate Fantasy with Global Consequences

Staff ReporterUSA 0

When my sons were younger, they had a way of expressing degrees of bad situations. Something could be “bad.” If it worsened, it became “worse.” And if it escalated further, it was “worser.”

Last night, their childhood terminology came to mind as I reflected on former President Donald Trump’s proposal regarding Gaza.

Trump has suggested that the United States should seize control of Gaza, forcibly remove its Palestinian population, and rebuild it into what he envisions as the “Riviera of the Middle East.”

Amid the flood of messages and social media reactions, there was an overwhelming sense of shock at such a proposal—though, undoubtedly, many still support it.

Since his presidency began, each day has felt like a series of political bombshells: granting pardons to those involved in the January 6 Capitol attack, mass detentions of immigrants—including those who are legally present and law-abiding—controversial Cabinet picks, and audacious geopolitical proposals, such as taking over Canada, Greenland, and the Panama Canal. Added to this was his mismanagement of the Washington, D.C., plane crash.

My sons’ phrase seems more relevant than ever—every day is “worser.”

And Trump’s Gaza vision? That might be the “worser” of them all.

Israeli political analyst and former ambassador Alon Pinkas ridiculed the idea as “comical,” adding that it “makes annexing Canada and buying Greenland seem much more practical in comparison.”

I wish I could find humor in this. I wish I could laugh alongside friends who joke about “Trump Tower Gaza” or “Gaza-Lago.” Even knowing that Trump’s son-in-law, real estate developer Jared Kushner, supports the idea provides no reassurance.

At his core, Trump is a businessman who sees the world through the lens of real estate deals. To him, Gaza represents an opportunity—miles of beachfront property ripe for redevelopment. In his vision, he and Kushner would transform a depopulated Gaza into a luxurious resort. While this would theoretically create jobs, in reality, it would serve as an American stronghold in an already volatile region.

As an American Jew, I see this plan as disastrous on multiple fronts.

First, from an American perspective, Trump’s idea is deeply flawed. It is difficult to imagine any legal framework under international law that would justify the forced takeover of foreign territory. Such an action would reinforce narratives of American imperialism and its colonial past.

The proposal would face opposition across the political spectrum. Even Trump’s staunchest supporters, those who rally behind his “America First” agenda, would struggle to justify it. As Senator Rand Paul put it, “I thought we voted for America First. We have no business contemplating yet another occupation to doom our treasure and spill our soldiers’ blood.”

Beyond being a poor idea, it is a dangerous one. My greatest fear is that such a move would provoke an increase in terrorist attacks targeting both Americans and Jews worldwide. For extremists, this proposal would present a perfect justification for violence—what could be described as a “twofer.”

From an Israeli standpoint, Trump’s plan is equally detrimental. If Israel continues to surrender to its most extreme right-wing elements, embodied by figures like Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, it risks the very foundation of Zionism. Furthermore, even entertaining the idea of an American takeover of Gaza could jeopardize ongoing negotiations for hostage releases. It would undo years of diplomatic efforts and the moral standing that Israel has worked tirelessly to uphold.

The ramifications of this plan are unacceptable on many levels.

It is intolerable from an American foreign policy perspective.

It is intolerable for the people of Gaza.

It is intolerable for Israel.

It is intolerable for the Jewish people. As a historically displaced people—who are currently reading about the Exodus from Egypt in synagogue—Jews would feel an acute sense of unease at such a proposal.

And it is intolerable for the next generation of Jews. The Book of Exodus asks, “And when your children ask you, ‘What does this service mean to you?’” Today, young American Jews are increasingly asking, “What does Israel mean to you—and to me?” The already fragile bond between Israel and young American Jews risks being severed entirely.

Some dismiss Trump’s remarks as mere rhetoric, arguing that he is simply throwing out ideas without a concrete plan. Perhaps an alternative exists—one in which the U.S. and Saudi Arabia collaborate on a Marshall Plan-style reconstruction of Gaza, focused on benefiting its Palestinian residents rather than transforming it into a Middle Eastern version of Miami Beach. Maybe this plan envisions a post-Hamas Gaza. Maybe it even lays the groundwork for genuine Palestinian sovereignty.

Maybe.

If Trump were to achieve true peace, security, and dignity for all people in the region, I would be the first to stand and applaud him.

But this proposal? This plan? This vision?

No.

Catholic Institutions Extend Generosity During Kumbh Mela, Offering Free Meals to Hindu Devotees

Staff ReporterReligion 0

In the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, a Catholic-run hospital and a college have extended an act of generosity by providing free meals to Hindu devotees attending the Kumbh Mela, the world’s largest religious gathering. The initiative aims to support the millions of pilgrims who have traveled long distances to participate in the sacred event.

Father Vipin D’Souza, the director of Nazareth Hospital, expressed his gratitude for the opportunity to assist the pilgrims, noting, “We are glad to lend hands to the pilgrims.” In partnership with the Allahabad Diocesan Commission for Interreligious Dialogue, the hospital organized free meals outside its premises on January 29 and February 3. These meals were offered to thousands of devotees passing by a road leading to the Kumbh Mela venue, which is located about five kilometers away. D’Souza elaborated on the decision to provide the meals, stating, “We decided to organize the free meals for the devotees as they have been walking more than 10-15 kilometers to reach the place.”

Recognizing the physical strain endured by the pilgrims, the hospital aimed to meet their needs with offerings of tea, snacks, and other food items. “Recognizing the needs of the weary pilgrims, we planned to give them tea, snacks, and other food items,” D’Souza shared. In addition to the meals, the hospital also provided free medicine to some of the devotees, with four Hindu monks receiving treatment at the facility without charge. In total, Nazareth Hospital served between 25,000 to 30,000 pilgrims, offering food, medical care, and other services.

The Kumbh Mela is a major Hindu festival with a rich history, held once every 12 years. The event, which is considered one of the largest religious pilgrimages in the world, involves devotees taking a sacred dip in holy rivers, such as the Ganges, with the belief that doing so cleanses them of their sins and brings spiritual purification. This year, the 45-day festival began on January 13 at the confluence of the Ganges, Yamuna, and Sarasvati rivers in Prayagraj (formerly known as Allahabad), the largest city in Uttar Pradesh. The event is expected to draw approximately 400 million pilgrims, with around six million taking the ritual dip in the river on January 14 alone.

Catholic nuns and staff from St. Mary’s Convent Inter College also took part in offering support to the devotees during the Kumbh Mela. The college distributed food and water to the pilgrims on January 28 and 30. Archit Banerjee, a college official, explained the intention behind the gesture, stating that the staff wanted to ensure the devotees could focus solely on their spiritual journey without concerns about their basic needs. Banerjee emphasized, “We wanted to ensure the devotees focused on the spiritual journey without worrying about basic necessities.”

The actions of these Catholic institutions during the Kumbh Mela have drawn attention, particularly in light of the ongoing tension between Christian communities and Hindu hardliners. Minakshi Singh, a Christian activist and secretary of Unity in Compassion, a charity organization based in Uttar Pradesh, spoke out in support of the gesture. She noted that this act of service challenges the long-standing narrative spread by Hindu hardliners, who often accuse Christians of trying to convert Hindus. Singh said, “It sends the message that Christians only believe in peace, love, and service to mankind.” She further highlighted the significance of the gesture, especially considering the challenges faced by Christians in the state, adding, “This act may prompt people to reflect that Christians are here for service of the people as many Christians people have faced persecution in the state, the highest numbers in the country.”

Uttar Pradesh, with a population of approximately 200 million people, is India’s most populous state. The majority of its residents are Hindus, while Muslims make up about 19 percent of the population. Christians, who constitute only around 0.18 percent of the state’s population, have faced significant persecution in recent years. According to rights groups, Hindu hardliners have been responsible for many of the incidents of violence against Christians. Last year, Uttar Pradesh recorded the highest number of anti-Christian incidents in the country, with 209 reported cases, as stated by the United Christian Forum, a Christian group based in New Delhi.

The Catholic-run institutions’ efforts during the Kumbh Mela stand in stark contrast to the persecution faced by Christians in Uttar Pradesh, signaling a message of love, compassion, and unity across religious lines. This charitable act not only serves the immediate needs of the pilgrims but also contributes to building bridges between religious communities in the region.

The outreach of Nazareth Hospital and St. Mary’s Convent Inter College is a testament to the spirit of interfaith solidarity and compassion. By focusing on service to others, these institutions have demonstrated a commitment to serving humanity, regardless of religious affiliations. As the Kumbh Mela continues to draw millions of devotees, the actions of these Christian institutions serve as a reminder of the power of kindness and the importance of fostering understanding and cooperation in the face of divisive rhetoric.

In a state where Christians make up a small fraction of the population, the goodwill extended by these institutions is especially meaningful. It challenges the prevailing stereotypes and shows that acts of kindness transcend religious boundaries. Singh’s statement reinforces this sentiment, suggesting that the generosity of the Catholic institutions may inspire reflection among people of all faiths. “It sends the message that Christians only believe in peace, love, and service to mankind,” she remarked.

In the broader context, these acts of charity also challenge the divisive rhetoric that has plagued the state in recent years. By offering their resources and support to the Hindu devotees, the Catholic-run institutions have demonstrated the true spirit of service, which is central to many religious teachings. Their actions highlight the shared values of compassion and care that unite people across different faiths, promoting harmony and mutual respect in a state marked by religious tensions.

These efforts, grounded in service and compassion, send a powerful message to all who witness them: that despite religious differences, the desire to help others is a common thread that binds humanity together. The Kumbh Mela, a sacred and significant event for Hindus, has thus become an occasion not only for spiritual renewal but also for fostering interfaith understanding and cooperation.

Reclaiming identity in modern relationships: How Women challenges societal expectations for women in marriage

Staff ReporterEntertainment 0

A woman is often defined by her roles, someone’s wife, daughter-in-law, or responsibility, while her own identity fades into the background. Mrs., ZEE5 Global’s latest film starring Sanya Malhotra, brings this reality to the forefront. It’s not just a story about marriage but about what it silently takes away—dreams, ambitions, and a sense of self.

Mrs (6) Richa, the woman at the heart of this story, enters marriage with dreams that feel close enough to touch. She wants to dance. She has ambition, drive, and a sense of who she is. But in her new home, none of that matters. There are other priorities—meals to cook, chores to finish, duties to fulfil. Slowly, without her even realizing it, the things that made her feel alive are pushed aside. Not taken away, not forbidden, just made impossible. It is a story about the moment a woman realizes that she has been conditioned to shrink herself, to prioritize everyone else before even thinking about what she wants. And once that realization sets in, what comes next?

Richa’s journey is filled with these quiet moments of defiance. They don’t come in the form of grand speeches or bold declarations. They exist in pauses, in hesitation, in choices that seem small but carry enormous weight. The decision to say no. The insistence that her name and her identity matters. The film also makes one thing clear: a woman’s worth cannot, and should not, be measured by how much of herself she is willing to give up.

Mrs. is a story that feels uncomfortably familiar. It is a reflection of conversations we’ve overheard, dynamics we’veMrs PR Poster witnessed, and for many women, experiences they’ve lived through. It speaks to those who have watched their own ambitions take a backseat, who have been made to feel that asking for more is selfish, who have learned to apologize for simply wanting to be seen. And yet, at its core, the film is not about despair, it is about possibility. It is about the hope that comes from recognizing that things can be different. That choosing yourself is not a betrayal. That a woman does not cease to be an individual the moment she becomes a wife.

ZEE5 Global continues to spotlight stories that reflect the struggles and realities of men and women in today’s society, making Mrs. a deeply relatable narrative. It speaks to those women who have been told that wanting more is selfish and reminds them that choosing themselves is not a betrayal. Streaming from February 7th, Mrs. is a story of quiet strength, self-discovery, and the fight to be seen.

About ZEE5 Global

ZEE5 Global is the digital entertainment destination launched by Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (ZEEL), a global Media and Entertainment powerhouse. The platform launched across 190+ countries in October 2018 and has content across 18 languages: Hindi, English, Bengali, Malayalam, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Marathi, Oriya, Bhojpuri, Gujarati, Punjabi, including six international languages Malay, Thai, Bahasa, Urdu, Bangla and Arabic. ZEE5 Global is home to 200,000+ hours of on-demand content. The platform brings together the best of Originals, Movies and TV Shows, Music, Health and Lifestyle content in one destination. In addition, ZEE5 Global offers features like 15 navigational languages, content download options, seamless video playback and Voice Search.

Trump Proposes U.S. Ownership of Gaza in Meeting with Netanyahu

Staff ReporterWorld 0

President Donald Trump met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Tuesday, where he proposed that the United States take control of the Gaza Strip and redevelop the war-torn territory.

During a press conference following their meeting, Trump suggested that the U.S. could relocate approximately 1.8 million Palestinians and completely rebuild the Gaza Strip. He envisioned transforming it into the “Riviera of the Middle East” under American administration.

“We’ll own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site,” Trump stated while Netanyahu observed. “Level the site, and get rid of the destroyed buildings. Level it out, create an economic development.”

Netanyahu was the first foreign leader to visit Trump since he took office last month. Trump underscored their close alliance, describing the relationship between their countries as “unbreakable.”

Trump’s remarks align with his previous calls for neighboring countries to absorb Palestinians displaced by the war between Israel and Hamas. He has specifically pointed to Egypt and Jordan as potential hosts, though both countries have firmly rejected the idea. However, Trump expressed confidence that they would ultimately comply.

Trump did not specify how the U.S. might assume control of Gaza but did not rule out deploying American troops to assist in reconstruction efforts. He also announced plans to visit Israel and Gaza.

When Netanyahu took the podium, he commended Trump’s dedication to Israel. Addressing Trump’s idea for Gaza, Netanyahu remarked, “I think it’s something that could change history. And I think it’s worthwhile really pursuing.”

The meeting occurred as Israel and Hamas continue negotiations over the second phase of a ceasefire agreement. The first phase centered on the release of Israeli hostages and Palestinian detainees.

Trump administration officials stressed the importance of fully implementing Phase 1 to ensure the safe return of all hostages, including those who have died. They explained that Phase 2 would aim to conclude the war and secure the release of all remaining Israeli captives in Gaza.

However, Trump’s envoy cautioned that Phase 3—rebuilding Gaza—would present significant challenges. He described the idea of reconstruction within five years as “physically impossible,” estimating that it would require a timeline of 10 to 15 years due to the extensive devastation caused by the conflict.

Trump also expressed skepticism about the durability of the ceasefire.

“I have no guarantees that the peace is going to hold,” he admitted to reporters in the Oval Office on Monday.

When questioned about his vision for a U.S.-led Gaza redevelopment, Trump responded, “I envision the world people living there. The world’s people. I think you’ll make that into an international, unbelievable place.”

He also acknowledged that Palestinians would continue to inhabit the territory.

“You have to learn from history. History is – you just can’t let it keep repeating itself. We have an opportunity to do something that could be phenomenal,” Trump stated.

As part of his broader Middle East strategy, Trump signed two executive orders on Tuesday. The first order intensified pressure on Iran, a decision he admitted was difficult.

“I’m signing this and I’m unhappy to do it, but I have not so much choice because we have to be strong and firm,” he said, emphasizing his hope that the measure would not have to be enforced.

“To me, it’s very simple. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon,” Trump added, asserting the U.S. authority to block the sale of Iranian oil to other nations.

The second order withdrew the U.S. from the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and terminated funding for the United Nations Relief Works Agency (UNRWA), which primarily assists Palestinian refugees.

Both Democrats and Republicans have criticized the UNHRC, accusing it of bias against Israel.

Additionally, the order included a consideration to withdraw from UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Trump Proposes US Takeover of Gaza, Netanyahu Calls Him Israel’s ‘Greatest Friend’

Staff ReporterWorld 0

US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held a joint press conference late Tuesday following their meeting at the White House, during which Trump proposed that the United States “take over” the Gaza Strip while discussing a potential truce with Hamas.

Netanyahu praised Trump, referring to him as “the greatest friend Israel has ever had.”

Key highlights from the press conference include Trump’s suggestion that the US would assume control of Gaza, his vision for its redevelopment, and Netanyahu’s emphasis on Israel’s objectives in the ongoing conflict.

Trump stated that the United States would “take over” and “own” the Gaza Strip. “The US will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a job with it, too. We’ll own it,” he said.

He did not dismiss the possibility of deploying US troops to Gaza, saying, “As far as Gaza is concerned, we’ll do what is necessary. If it’s necessary, we’ll do that.”

Trump outlined plans for clearing unexploded ordnance, demolishing damaged structures, and developing infrastructure to generate jobs and housing.

He also reiterated his belief that Palestinians should relocate to other Middle Eastern countries, such as Egypt and Jordan, despite both nations and Palestinian leaders rejecting this notion.

“It (Gaza Strip) should not go through a process of rebuilding and occupation by the same people that have really stood there and fought for it and lived there and died there and lived a miserable existence there,” Trump said.

He added that the two million people in Gaza should “go to other countries of interest with humanitarian hearts.”

Trump further elaborated that he viewed US control over Gaza as a long-term strategy, emphasizing that Palestinians should move elsewhere. “This is not a decision made lightly,” he said. He claimed widespread approval for the idea, stating, “Everybody I’ve spoken to loves the idea of the United States owning that piece of land.”

He also suggested that Gaza could be transformed into a prime destination. “The Riviera of the Middle East. This could be something that could be so magnificent,” he said, envisioning Gaza as an international attraction open to people from around the world, including Palestinians.

Netanyahu commended Trump and his proposals, calling him “the greatest friend Israel has ever had” and indicating that Trump’s plan could “change history” and warranted serious consideration.

“I’ve said this before, I’ll say it again: you are the greatest friend Israel has ever had in the White House,” Netanyahu remarked. “And that’s why the people of Israel have such enormous respect for you.”

Netanyahu also emphasized that Israel’s mission in Gaza remains unfinished, urging Trump to support efforts to secure Israel’s future. He listed three main objectives: eliminating Hamas, ensuring the release of hostages, and preventing Gaza from posing further threats to Israel.

He expressed confidence that Trump’s “willingness to puncture conventional thinking” would help achieve these goals.

“Israel will end the war by winning the war. Israel’s victory will be America’s victory,” Netanyahu declared.

Forbes 2025 List of the World’s Most Powerful Countries: India Absent from Top 10

Staff ReporterWorld 0

Forbes has unveiled its 2025 list of the world’s ten most powerful countries, with the United States securing the top position, followed by China in second place. Israel rounds out the list at the tenth spot. The rankings, based on multiple key factors, have ignited discussions due to the absence of India, despite its significant global standing as the country with the largest population, the fourth-largest military, and the fifth-largest economy.

Forbes clarified that the rankings were compiled by US News, with the methodology centered around five essential parameters: leadership, economic influence, political power, strong international alliances, and military strength.

The ranking system was devised by BAV Group, a division of the global marketing firm WPP, in collaboration with researchers from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, led by Professor David Reibstein. The research was conducted in association with US News & World Report.

As of February 2025, India holds the 12th position in the global power rankings. This placement considers India’s growing economic strength, key international alliances, and military capabilities. In terms of global GDP, India is ranked fifth, following the United States, China, Germany, and Japan.

Top 10 powerful countries in the world 2025

S.No Country GDP Population Region
1. United States $30.34 trillion 34.5 crore North America
2. China $19.53 trillion 141.9 crore Asia
3. Russia $2.2 trillion 144.4 crore Asia
4. United Kingdom $3.73 trillion 6.91 crore Europe
5. Germany $4.92 trillion 8.45 crore Europe
6. South Korea $1.95 trillion 5.17 crore Asia
7. France $3.28 trillion 6.65 crore Europe
8. Japan $4.39 trillion 12.37 crore Asia
9. Saudi Arabia $1.14 trillion 3.39 crore Asia
10. Israel $550.91 billion 93.8 lakh Asia

UK to Revamp Global Talent Visa in 2025: Key Changes and Application Process

Staff ReporterImmigration 0

The United Kingdom is poised to make major changes to its work visa system in 2025, introducing significant updates to the Global Talent Visa. This self-sponsored visa provides a unique opportunity for highly skilled professionals to live and work in the UK without requiring employer sponsorship.

For experts in fields such as technology, science, arts, and academia, the Global Talent Visa could serve as a gateway to the UK’s competitive job market. Below is an overview of the Global Talent Visa, the latest policy changes, eligibility criteria, and the application process.

Understanding the UK Global Talent Visa

The Global Talent Visa is designed for individuals with exceptional talent in key sectors, allowing them to work in the UK without being tied to a specific employer. Unlike the Skilled Worker Visa, which mandates a job offer, this visa grants professionals the flexibility to switch jobs, operate independently, or establish a business in the UK.

This visa is particularly aimed at professionals working in:

  • Technology and digital innovation, including artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and software development
  • Engineering and advanced manufacturing
  • Science and research
  • Arts and culture, such as filmmaking, music, design, and architecture
  • Academia and higher education

To qualify, applicants must demonstrate exceptional talent or promise in their respective fields and secure an endorsement from a recognized UK organization.

Updated Eligibility Criteria for the Global Talent Visa (2025)

To obtain a Global Talent Visa, applicants must meet the following criteria:

  1. Endorsement from an Approved UK Body

Applicants must secure an endorsement from one of the following official organizations:

  1. Tech Nation for professionals in digital technology
  2. Arts Council England for artists, musicians, and designers
  3. Royal Academy of Engineering for engineers
  4. British Academy, Royal Society, or UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) for scientists and researchers
  1. Proof of Exceptional Talent or Promise

Candidates must demonstrate their accomplishments through:

  1. Awards, patents, or published research
  2. Media recognition and industry impact
  3. Contributions to major projects, startups, or established companies
  1. No Job Offer Required but Clear Work Intentions Needed

Although a job offer is not necessary, applicants must outline their professional objectives in the UK, such as freelancing, launching startups, or collaborating with local businesses.

  1. No Minimum Salary Requirement and No Employer Sponsorship Needed

Unlike the Skilled Worker Visa, there is no salary threshold. Applicants are free to work on multiple projects, freelance, or start businesses.

  1. English Proficiency and Security Clearance

Some applicants may need to demonstrate basic English proficiency. Security and background checks are mandatory for approval.

Application Process for the UK Global Talent Visa in 2025

The Global Talent Visa application process consists of two main stages:

Stage 1: Endorsement Application

  • Select the appropriate endorsing body (e.g., Tech Nation, Arts Council, UKRI).
  • Submit a portfolio showcasing expertise and achievements.
  • Pay the endorsement application fee of £524 (updated for 2025).
  • Await approval, which can take between 2 to 8 weeks. AI and cybersecurity professionals may be eligible for a fast-track option.

Stage 2: Visa Application

  • Apply online via the UK Home Office portal.
  • Pay the visa application fee of £192 (updated for 2025).
  • Cover the NHS Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS).
  • Submit biometric data, including fingerprints and photos, at a visa center.

Updated Fees for the UK Global Talent Visa (2025)

Fee Type Amount
Endorsement Application Fee £524
Visa Application Fee £192
Total Cost per Applicant £716
NHS Immigration Health Surcharge £1,035 per year (per person)

Applicants with dependents, such as partners or children, will need to pay an additional £716 per person.

Visa Processing Time

After submitting an application, identity verification, and required documents, applicants typically receive a decision within:

  • Three weeks if applying from outside the UK
  • Eight weeks if applying from within the UK

Key Changes to the UK Global Talent Visa in 2025

The UK government has introduced several updates to streamline applications, enhance security, and refine eligibility standards. Below are the major policy changes for 2025:

  1. Mandatory Electronic Travel Authorization (ETA)
    1. Starting in 2025, all Global Talent Visa applicants must obtain an ETA before entering the UK.
    2. The ETA system will enhance security screening and ensure applicants meet eligibility requirements before travel.
  2. Stricter Endorsement Criteria
    1. Endorsing bodies such as Tech Nation, Arts Council England, and the Royal Academy of Engineering will impose more rigorous requirements.
    2. Greater emphasis will be placed on internationally recognized awards, patents, and high-impact research.
  3. Fast-Track Processing for AI and Cybersecurity Professionals
    1. Due to the increasing demand for tech talent, applicants specializing in AI and cybersecurity will have their applications processed within three weeks instead of the usual eight weeks.
    2. This priority track aims to attract top global professionals in cutting-edge technological fields.
  4. Increase in Visa Fees and NHS Health Surcharge
    1. Visa fees will rise by 10% to reflect increased processing costs.
    2. The NHS Immigration Health Surcharge has also increased, requiring a higher upfront payment for healthcare access.

These updates reinforce the UK’s commitment to attracting top-tier talent while maintaining a structured and competitive visa application process.

Why Consider the UK Global Talent Visa?

The UK Global Talent Visa remains a top choice for professionals seeking flexibility, independence, and career growth in one of the world’s leading economies. The main benefits include:

  • No employer sponsorship required, allowing applicants to work freely.
  • No salary threshold, giving professionals greater control over their income.
  • Fast-track processing for AI and cybersecurity applicants, reducing waiting periods.
  • Pathway to permanent residency, with the potential for UK settlement after three to five years.

With competition expected to increase under the revised 2025 regulations, applicants should ensure their applications are well-prepared, with substantial proof of expertise and a clear professional roadmap.

Final Thoughts

For highly skilled professionals looking to build a future in the UK, the Global Talent Visa presents a valuable opportunity. However, with stricter eligibility requirements and rising fees in 2025, thorough preparation is essential to maximize the chances of approval.

Prospective applicants should begin by securing an endorsement, planning their career path in the UK, and ensuring they meet all eligibility criteria. With the right approach, this visa can serve as a stepping stone to a thriving professional career in the UK.

For further details on eligibility and the application process, visit the official UK Government website: UK Global Talent Visa.

Tamil Nadu Offers $1 Million to Crack Indus Valley Script as Roman-Era Treasure Discovered

Staff ReporterCulture 0

The Indus Valley Civilization, one of the oldest known civilizations, flourished several millennia ago in regions corresponding to modern-day Pakistan and western India. At its peak, it was home to over five million people and was renowned for its sophisticated urban infrastructure. However, the script used by this civilization remains an unsolved mystery, leaving the language and identity of its people unknown.

The reason behind the civilization’s disappearance around 1900 BCE is still debated. In an effort to decipher the enigmatic script, the Tamil Nadu government in southern India has announced a reward of $1 million for anyone who can successfully decode it. “Whoever solves the Indian enigma will become a millionaire,” the official statement declared.

Indus Valley inscriptions consist of symbols and signs that were primarily etched onto pottery and stones. The inscriptions are brief and follow distinct patterns, leading scholars to question whether they constitute a complete language. Researchers have identified around 400 unique symbols, and with the lucrative prize at stake, interest in solving the mystery has surged.

Rare Roman-Era Coins Discovered

While the challenge to decipher the Indus script gains momentum, a remarkable archaeological discovery has emerged from a small town in the Netherlands. More than 400 gold and silver coins from the Roman era, dating back to the first century CE, have been unearthed.

The treasure includes coins bearing images of prominent rulers from Rome, Britain, and Africa, such as Claudius and Julius Caesar. Among the hoard, 116 coins are made of gold and are believed to have been buried around 47 CE. Experts suggest they may have been hidden by a Roman soldier returning from Britain, possibly with war loot.

This finding is particularly significant as it represents the largest Roman-era treasure ever discovered in the Utrecht province. Additionally, it is the first recorded instance in Europe of a collection containing both Roman and British coins.

Following meticulous cleaning and restoration, the coins have been incorporated into the national archaeological collection. Researchers will continue studying them to gain further insights into the historical connections between the regions they originated from.

-+=