The Lok Sabha witnessed sharp debates over the Union Budget, with the Opposition accusing the government of favoring NDA-ruled states to sustain a fragile coalition, while the Treasury benches defended the budget as inclusive and equitable.
Congress MP Kumari Selja initiated the debate by labeling the budget as a collection of “jumlas (insincere promises).” She cautioned NDA members Nitish Kumar and N. Chandrababu Naidu against celebrating their states’ significant allocations, warning that political fortunes can change rapidly. “I would like to caution these two States… Nitishji has been with us for a long time, serving in the 10th Lok Sabha term, and Naiduji is also very experienced. Do not be swayed by their (government’s) words. It may seem today that they have given a lot, but it doesn’t take long for the tide to turn. Therefore, I want to caution them (JDU and TDP) as well. They may celebrate today, but it doesn’t take long for times to change,” she remarked. Selja also criticized the budget as a “kursi bachao Budget” (a budget to save the chair) and pointed to declining public trust in the government, noting, “People do not trust this budget, which is why the number of seats fell from 303 to 240.”
Trinamool Congress MP Abhishek Banerjee echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the fragile nature of the NDA coalition. He pointed out that not even the Finance Minister referred to the government as Modi 3.0 during the Budget presentation, highlighting the coalition’s instability. “It is so uncertain and fragile that it can implode anytime,” Banerjee stated, frequently using the phrase “waqt badal raha hai (time is changing)” to underline the government’s reduced numbers and the transition from a majority to a coalition. “After yesterday, one thing is clear, coalition means appeasement and compensation,” he asserted. Banerjee accused the Modi government of neglecting West Bengal and other regions, citing the reduction in benefits from schemes like MNERGA and housing. “Since you have failed to defeat us politically in West Bengal, you are now conspiring against the people of the state,” he alleged.
Banerjee also criticized the government’s “eccentric decisions” such as the “unplanned lockdown,” farm laws, and demonetization, which he claimed led to deaths, job losses, and economic despair. When Speaker Om Birla urged him to focus on contemporary issues, Banerjee retorted that while demonetization occurred in 2016, the BJP often referenced policies from over 60 years ago to criticize former Prime Minister Jawahar Lal Nehru.
DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran launched a vehement attack on the Modi government, accusing it of spending enormous public funds on promoting “Modi ka guarantee” before the elections, only to replace it with “Modi ka insurance” afterward. “Lakhs of crores of public money were spent to promote Modi ka guarantee before Lok Sabha polls. After the election, Modi ka guarantee is replaced with Modi ka insurance. Premium is being paid by the people to ensure he continues as PM,” Maran declared.
Defending the budget, BJP MP from Tripura Biplab Deb asserted that the NDA would remain in power until 2047, promising to elevate India to new heights. He emphasized that the budget addressed the needs of all states and sections of society, highlighting an additional ₹4.82 lakh crore allocation for states. “Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s guarantee is still there, it is there in the budget also,” Deb said. He also rebuked the Congress and other opposition parties for alleging threats to the Constitution, pointing out that the Congress had invoked Article 356 seventy times to undermine the Constitution. “Why was the Emergency imposed, it was imposed because of one person and one family. The Emergency was imposed for one person — Indira Gandhi… now they carry the copy of Constitution,” Deb criticized. He confidently proclaimed, “We will do 400 paar, there will be a government of BJP and NDA till 2047 and people will give a befitting reply to the Opposition.”
Samajwadi Party MP Birendra Singh criticized the budget for omitting any mention of Uttar Pradesh, despite Prime Minister Modi representing Varanasi in the Lok Sabha. He also called for a rollback of the Agnipath military recruitment scheme.
The debate underscored the deep divisions between the government and the opposition, with each side presenting starkly different views on the budget’s intent and impact.