Trump and Zelenskyy to Meet Amid Tensions Over Peace Talks and U.S. Policy Shift on Russia

February 28, 2025March 3, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are set to meet at the White House on Friday following heated exchanges over peace negotiations and an unexpected shift in U.S. policy toward Vladimir Putin and Russia.

As the conflict nears its third anniversary, Trump has referred to Zelenskyy as a “dictator without elections” and a “modestly successful comedian,” while adopting a more accommodating stance toward Putin. Trump suggested that the U.S. would negotiate the terms of a settlement with Russia.

Zelenskyy, in response, accused Trump of being trapped in a “web of disinformation,” particularly after preliminary discussions between U.S. and Kremlin officials in Saudi Arabia. Trump also falsely claimed that Ukraine initiated the war, disregarding the fact that Russia launched the invasion.

The key issue at stake, which could influence the course of peace talks, is an agreement granting the U.S. access to Ukraine’s mineral resources. Trump has framed this deal as a means to ensure that American taxpayers receive some form of reimbursement for the financial aid provided to Ukraine during its conflict with Russia.

“We’ll be digging. We’ll be dig, dig, digging. Dig, we must,” Trump stated on Thursday, emphasizing that the U.S. would be actively involved in extracting rare earth minerals in Ukraine. “It’ll be great for Ukraine. It’s like a huge economic development project. So, it’ll be good for both countries.”

Zelenskyy, however, has presented the deal differently, viewing it primarily as a strategy to maintain U.S. support.

Although the agreement does not offer the security guarantees Zelenskyy deems essential for a lasting peace settlement, Trump administration officials argue that significant U.S. investment in Ukraine’s economy could function as a deterrent against further Russian aggression.

“I will meet with President Trump,” Zelenskyy stated on Wednesday. “For me, and for all of us in the world, it is crucial that America’s assistance is not stopped. Strength is essential on the path to peace.”

Details of the Agreement

According to officials familiar with the discussions, the agreement involves U.S.-Ukraine collaboration in extracting valuable minerals and other natural resources from Ukrainian soil.

Unlike previous proposals, this version does not require Ukraine to allocate revenue from mineral sales to repay the U.S. $500 billion—an amount the Trump administration previously described as “payback” for the approximately $183 billion in aid provided to Ukraine, as reported by the U.S. special inspector general overseeing Ukrainian assistance.

Instead, the deal proposes the creation of a joint investment fund for Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction. The specifics regarding the management and operation of this fund will be determined through subsequent negotiations.

Much of the success of this initiative will depend on market forces.

“The profitability of the fund is entirely dependent on the success of new investments in Ukraine’s resources,” said Gracelin Baskaran, director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and Meredith Schwartz, a research associate at the same program.

“Therefore, the response of private industry is key to the success of the fund and will determine how much value the United States ultimately derives,” they explained.

However, Ukrainian officials made some concessions. Initially, Kyiv sought firm security guarantees within the agreement, but the finalized framework lacks these provisions.

“However, the idea is that with joint U.S.-Ukraine investment in the nation’s resources, the United States will continue to have a stake in Ukraine’s security, stability, and lasting peace and therefore be incentivized to uphold and defend Ukrainian security,” Baskaran and Schwartz stated.

Should the deal prove successful, they suggest that the U.S. may enhance its mineral security, but tangible benefits might not materialize for decades.

“Mining is a long-term effort—so the United States may not yield benefits for another 20 years,” they noted.

Trump himself acknowledged the uncertainty.

“You know, you dig and maybe things aren’t there like you think they’re there,” he remarked on Thursday.

A Shift in Trump’s Rhetoric

After days of harsh criticism directed at Zelenskyy, Trump moderated his stance on Thursday.

When asked whether he still considered Zelenskyy a dictator—an assertion he made just over a week ago—Trump replied, “Did I say that? I can’t believe I said that,” before quickly moving on.

Later in the day, Trump also commended Zelenskyy and Ukrainian forces for their resilience in combat.

“We’ve given him a lot of equipment and a lot of money, but they have fought very bravely. No matter how you figure it, they have really fought,” Trump acknowledged. “Somebody has to use that equipment. And they have been very brave in that sense.”

Ukrainian officials advocating for the mineral deal may view Trump’s softened rhetoric as validation of their argument—that signing the agreement could strengthen ties between Kyiv and the Trump administration, whereas delaying it might further strain Trump’s perception of Zelenskyy.

However, whether this positive shift in tone will endure remains uncertain.

“Critical mineral resource access is the latest arena for Trump to focus his transactional methods of diplomacy,” Baskaran and Schwartz stated. “But the viability of the deal remains to be seen as tensions continue to rise between the two world leaders.”

Given Trump’s well-known impatience, some U.S. officials anticipate that slow progress on the deal could lead to frustration.

Additionally, any discord during Friday’s White House meeting could quickly sour Trump’s attitude toward Zelenskyy once again. While Trump is expected to emphasize the economic benefits of the agreement for the U.S., Zelenskyy is likely to push for additional security assurances.

Nonetheless, Trump projected optimism ahead of the meeting.

“I think we’re going to have a very good meeting,” he said. “We’re going to get along really well. Okay. We have a lot of respect. I have a lot of respect for him.”

John E. Herbst, senior director of the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Center and a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, believes that the very fact that the meeting is taking place is a positive development for Ukraine.

“Zelenskyy’s visit highlights how far he has come from two weeks back, when Trump spoke of seeing Putin as many as three times in the near future, or even last week, when senior Russian and U.S. officials were meeting in Riyadh,” Herbst said. “Yet now it is Zelenskyy, not Putin, in the Oval Office.”

Ongoing Peace Talks

While public attention has largely shifted to negotiations over the mineral deal, discussions aimed at ultimately resolving the war in Ukraine are continuing through separate diplomatic channels.

On Thursday, American and Russian officials convened in Istanbul for a six-hour meeting focused on expanding the staffing of their respective embassies in Moscow and Washington. Secretary of State Marco Rubio previously emphasized that such diplomatic expansion was necessary to facilitate cooperation, including efforts to end the war in Ukraine.

Officials from both sides described the meeting’s outcome as favorable, predicting that a stronger diplomatic presence could pave the way for broader peace negotiations and a potential summit between Trump and Putin.

As European leaders push for U.S. security guarantees to enforce a truce in Ukraine, Trump has repeatedly asserted his confidence in Putin’s commitment to honoring a peace agreement.

“I’ve known him for a long time now,” Trump said. “I don’t believe he’s going to violate his word. I don’t think he’ll be back. When we make a deal, I think the deal is going to hold.”

However, before meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Trump added an important qualifier.

“You know, look, it’s trust and verify, let’s call it that,” he remarked.

Clifford D. May, president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, stressed the importance of Trump maintaining a realistic perspective on Putin.

“As President Trump attempts to negotiate a halt to Russia’s war against Ukraine, it’s not unreasonable for him to show respect for Mr. Putin (as he has been) if he believes that will make Mr. Putin more likely to agree to concessions,” May said.

“But it’s imperative that President Trump harbor no illusions about Mr. Putin—about his character, ambitions, ideology, and his abiding hatred for American greatness,” he added.

Pope Francis’ Historic Papacy: Embracing the Marginalized and Facing Controversy

February 27, 2025March 3, 2025 Staff ReporterReligion 0

Pope Francis, who remains in critical condition due to pneumonia in both lungs, was elected to the papacy on March 13, 2013, following the unexpected resignation of Benedict XVI.

Before assuming the role of pope, he was known as Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the archbishop of Buenos Aires. His election marked several historic firsts—he was the first pontiff from the Americas and the first to choose the name Francis, a tribute to St. Francis of Assisi, the 13th-century mystic known for his compassion for the poor and deep connection to nature.

Unlike his predecessors, Pope Francis opted for simpler attire, forgoing the traditional red shoes and silk vestments. However, his impact on the church extended beyond his appearance. His leadership opened the church to the wider world in unprecedented ways.

Care for the marginalized

Pope Francis was deeply committed to reaching out to those on the fringes of society. He personally engaged with the poor, going so far as to transform a Vatican plaza into a sanctuary for the homeless, whom he referred to as “nobles of the street.”

His compassion extended to migrants and prisoners, whose feet he washed during the traditional Holy Thursday foot-washing ceremony. In a break from tradition, he also washed the feet of non-Christians, a move that was considered groundbreaking for a pope.

He also fostered a more inclusive approach toward LGBTQ+ individuals, inviting transgender people to the Vatican and encouraging a welcoming stance toward gay and lesbian Catholics.

On doctrinal matters, however, he upheld many traditional Catholic teachings. While he affirmed that homosexual behavior was a “sin,” he also clarified that it should not be criminalized. He was critical of gender theory, arguing that it “blurs” the distinctions between men and women.

Although he maintained the long-standing position that only men could be ordained as priests, he introduced significant reforms that expanded leadership roles for women. For the first time in history, he appointed a woman to head an administrative office at the Vatican. Women were also included in the 70-member body responsible for selecting bishops and the 15-member council overseeing Vatican finances. Additionally, he appointed Sister Raffaella Petrini as president of Vatican City, marking another milestone in female leadership within the church.

Not shy of controversy

Some of Pope Francis’ positions provoked resistance from within the Catholic Church.

One of the more contentious issues was his embrace of religious diversity. Speaking at the Seventh Congress of Leaders of World and Traditional Religions in Kazakhstan in 2022, he declared that people of different faiths were “children of the same heaven.”

While visiting Morocco, he discouraged Catholics from actively seeking conversions, instead urging them to live “in brotherhood with other faiths.” However, some critics felt such statements undermined the belief in Christianity’s unique truth.

Another source of controversy was his push for “synodality,” a call for a more democratic approach to church governance. His synod meetings in November 2023 included laypeople and women as voting members, a significant departure from past practices. This initiative was met with skepticism from bishops who feared it would diminish the authority of priests as spiritual leaders.

Pope Francis also made strategic appointments that could shape the future of the church. He increased the number of cardinals from the Global South, a move that reflected Catholicism’s demographic shift. However, not all Global South bishops aligned with his teachings. For instance, African bishops publicly opposed his December 2023 ruling that allowed blessings for individuals in same-sex relationships.

One of his most controversial actions was restricting the use of the Latin Mass, reversing a decision by Benedict XVI that had expanded its practice. Traditionalists saw the Latin Mass as a cherished part of Catholic heritage, while Francis believed its widespread use created divisions among worshippers.

His commitment to unity also led him to discipline high-profile critics within the church. Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, and Cardinal Raymond Burke were among those penalized for their opposition to his reforms. Additionally, former Vatican ambassador Carlo Maria Viganò was excommunicated for inciting “schism.”

Pope Francis did not shy away from political matters either. He openly criticized the Trump administration’s immigration policies, particularly efforts to deport migrants. In a letter to U.S. bishops, he invoked the Holy Family, reminding them that Jesus, Mary, and Joseph had themselves been refugees in Egypt. He also asserted that undocumented migrants should not be treated as criminals, emphasizing their inherent dignity as human beings.

Writings on “the common good”

Pope Francis’ encyclicals—formal letters addressing critical issues—reflected his vision for a more just world. A recurring theme in his writings was the “common good,” or the shared rights and responsibilities necessary for human flourishing.

His first encyclical, Lumen Fidei (“The Light of Faith”), published in 2013, explored how faith can unite people across different backgrounds.

In Laudato Si’ (“Praise Be to You”), he addressed the environmental crisis, highlighting pollution, climate change, and economic inequality. He called for an “integral ecology” that respects both humanity and the natural world.

His 2020 encyclical, Fratelli Tutti (“Brothers All”), condemned what he termed a “throwaway culture,” where vulnerable groups—such as the poor, the unborn, and the elderly—are cast aside. Uniquely, he concluded this letter by acknowledging non-Catholic figures who inspired him, including Martin Luther King Jr., Desmond Tutu, and Mahatma Gandhi.

His final encyclical, Dilexit Nos (“He Loved Us”), centered on God’s love, symbolized by the Sacred Heart of Jesus. This sacred image, with flames emanating from Christ’s wounded heart, represents divine love and mercy.

Pope Francis also declared a special “Year of Mercy” in 2015-2016, urging the church to embrace compassion. He frequently described Jesus as “the face of God’s mercy,” reinforcing his message of forgiveness and inclusion.

A historic papacy

Pope Francis’ tenure has been one of historic significance. His commitment to the marginalized set him apart from his predecessors, as he extended the church’s mission to include those often overlooked by society.

He not only reinforced the Catholic Church’s dedication to the poor but also expanded its decision-making processes to be more inclusive. However, his rapid reforms were met with opposition from traditionalists who believed he moved too quickly. The longevity of his changes remains uncertain and will largely depend on his successor.

One of his lasting legacies will be his shift of influence in the Catholic Church from Western Europe to the Global South, where the majority of Catholics now reside. His papacy redefined the church’s engagement with social justice, interfaith dialogue, and governance, ensuring that his impact will be felt for generations to come.

Millions Participate in Kumbh Mela Despite Concerns Over Overcrowding and Pollution

February 27, 2025March 2, 2025 Staff ReporterCulture 0

Hundreds of millions of Hindu devotees have gathered to bathe in sacred waters, undeterred by concerns regarding overcrowding and pollution, as the world’s largest religious gathering concluded on Wednesday in India’s northern state of Uttar Pradesh.

Over a span of 45 days, the Maha Kumbh Mela, also known as the festival of the Sacred Pitcher, drew more than 620 million attendees—accounting for nearly one-third of India’s estimated 1.4 billion population. The event, held along the riverbanks in Prayagraj, was a grand display of color and devotion.

Pilgrims participated in a holy dip at the Triveni Sangam, the confluence of three sacred rivers—the Ganges, Yamuna, and the mythical Saraswati—believing that this act would purify their sins and bring them closer to “spiritual liberation.”

This festival, which occurs every 12 years with the prefix “Maha,” meaning great, is the largest form of the Kumbh Mela, which is otherwise held every three years in one of four designated cities.

“It is a unique, once-in-a-lifetime experience,” remarked Sushovan Sircar, a 36-year-old independent consultant from Delhi. “People from all over India are here, as I saw number plates of cars from almost every state.”

Despite concerns about overcrowding and reports of high contamination levels in key bathing sites, millions participated in the event. However, the celebrations were overshadowed by two separate tragic crowd crush incidents.

A report from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), part of India’s Environment Ministry, highlighted alarming levels of coliform bacteria in the Ganges and Yamuna rivers. This finding raised concerns despite the government’s emphasis on sustainability initiatives and sanitation measures.

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath dismissed the government report’s accuracy, asserting that the water was not only safe for bathing but also suitable for the Hindu ritual of drinking a handful after immersion.

Pilgrims often fully submerge themselves in the water, with some drinking or collecting the sacred water in containers.

‘My Sins Are Cleansed, But Not My Body’

Sircar recounted his experience of bathing at Sangam point—the most revered spot where the three rivers meet—twice last week.

“There is a concern because there is nothing I can do about the contamination in the water. In your mind, you tell yourself, this part looks clean, spend a few minutes in, recite prayers and come out,” he said.

He added humorously, “I took a shower for sins and then another shower for the contamination. So you need a bath after the bath… My sins are cleansed, but not (my) body.”

Ahead of the festival, India’s top environmental court had instructed state and federal pollution boards to ensure that the river water was clean enough for both drinking and bathing. The court mandated increased monitoring and sample collection of the Ganges and Yamuna rivers, prohibiting any discharge of untreated sewage or solid waste.

However, a report submitted by the federal pollution board on February 3 revealed that faecal coliform levels, a key indicator of untreated sewage, were significantly above the safe limit of 2,500 units per 100 milliliters.

At multiple locations along the Ganges and Yamuna rivers near Prayagraj, the contamination levels exceeded the safe threshold by more than 1,000 times, according to the report.

Adityanath assured that his administration was continuously monitoring water levels to maintain quality standards.

Kumbh Mela organizers also defended their efforts, stating that an “exhaustive survey” was conducted on all 81 drains that release water into the rivers before the festival began.

“We have ensured that the water quality has been maintained,” said Vivek Chaturvedi, an official overseeing the Kumbh Mela.

Aishwary Sharma, a 31-year-old finance professional from Delhi, admitted he was aware of the potential pollution but still took part in the ritual.

“I think it is quite evident that the Ganga and Yamuna are not clean rivers,” he stated. “(But) there are many things that are bad for you… The air we breathe is so toxic for our health… It is just another thing that is polluted that could have a harmful impact on my health.”

For many, faith and devotion took precedence over health concerns.

“What (most people) are interested in is their devotion and religion and that they want to take that holy dip,” said Sunny Parasher, a 34-year-old from Panchkula in Haryana.

“Where there is devotion, where there is religion, there is no question,” he emphasized.

However, Kalpana Mishra, a 55-year-old housewife from Prayagraj, decided against taking another holy dip after reading the pollution board’s report.

“What does being a literate person mean if you hear all this and still decide to go?” she questioned.

Health experts warn that exposure to faecal contamination can cause waterborne diseases such as typhoid, diarrhea, cholera, gastroenteritis, E. coli infections, skin ailments, and vomiting.

Push to Clean the Rivers

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has prioritized cleaning the Ganges since assuming office in 2014, dedicating billions of dollars to sewage treatment, surface waste cleanup, and afforestation efforts.

The Ganges supports 400 million people who rely on it for their livelihood, but 50 cities along its course discharge nearly 3 billion liters of sewage daily. According to the World Bank, only a fraction of this waste undergoes treatment before entering the river.

The Yamuna, a major tributary of the Ganges, has also been severely impacted by untreated sewage and industrial chemicals for decades.

Ahead of the festival, authorities promoted the event as a “Green Kumbh,” emphasizing sustainability initiatives such as banning single-use plastics, introducing eco-friendly toilets, deploying electric rickshaws, and hiring 15,000 sanitation workers to manage waste during major bathing days.

In January, the Ministry of Culture stated that the festival had been “meticulously planned to uphold hygiene and ecological balance,” describing it as a model for future large-scale events worldwide.

Environmental responsibility was a major topic at a conference held during the festival, where religious and environmental leaders discussed ways in which religious institutions could contribute to addressing the climate crisis.

“If there is no water in the rivers, there is no Kumbh. We don’t consider it water, we consider it nectar,” said Swami Chidanand Saraswati, an Indian spiritual leader. “If we all do not make efforts to protect it, then the next (Kumbh Mela) will be on mere sand.”

Despite these efforts, the overwhelming turnout posed a significant challenge. The festival saw 250 million more attendees than initially anticipated. Authorities had planned for approximately 400 million people over six weeks—averaging about 9 million per day—but government estimates indicate that around 620 million participated.

“It is a mammoth task to take care of such a crowd,” stated Dr. Nupur Bahadur, associate director at The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), a research institute specializing in wastewater management.

To mitigate river contamination, Bahadur suggested implementing better on-site prevention and disinfection strategies.

“One of them could be halting the dip after every 12 hours for one hour” and allowing fresh water to flow through the bathing areas before “the dips can be restarted,” she proposed.

While the festival’s record-breaking turnout strained its infrastructure, Bahadur acknowledged that the management had achieved “the best human effort possible” under the circumstances.

For residents of Prayagraj, however, the return to normal life could not come soon enough.

“My eyes are constantly burning and there is so much dust,” said Mishra. “I want the festival to end so I can get back to my life.”

House Republicans Clear Key Hurdle for Trump’s Domestic Agenda

February 26, 2025February 28, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

President Donald Trump’s domestic agenda took a significant step forward on Tuesday as House Republicans managed to overcome internal divisions over spending to pass a crucial framework for a multitrillion-dollar plan covering defense, energy, immigration, and tax policy.

The approval of this framework is a vital milestone, as it allows Republicans to utilize a complex legislative process known as reconciliation. This tool enables them to bypass a Democratic filibuster in the Senate, but they first had to come to an agreement on a budget blueprint to unlock it.

“We got it done,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters following the vote. “This is the first important step in opening up the reconciliation process. We have a lot of hard work ahead of us, but we are going to deliver the America First agenda.”

With a slim majority in the House, Republicans needed nearly unanimous support from their members. The measure ultimately passed by a narrow 217-215 margin, with just one Republican opposing the budget resolution.

Tuesday’s vote represents an early victory in what is expected to be a long and challenging road to passing the GOP’s policy priorities. The Senate, which is also under Republican control, had already advanced its own budget reconciliation plan, frustrated by the delays in the House. Now, both chambers must pass an identical bill to move the process forward.

At the start of the day, GOP leaders were still working to consolidate support. Johnson and his team spent weeks engaged in difficult negotiations, struggling to reconcile the demands of various factions within their party.

Fiscal conservatives pushed for deep spending cuts, while other Republicans voiced concerns about reductions affecting Medicaid, the government insurance program that provides health coverage for millions of low-income and disabled Americans.

The House’s budget proposal includes a funding boost for securing the southern border, an increase in military spending, and an increase in the nation’s debt limit by $4 trillion.

Additionally, the plan calls for $4.5 trillion in tax cuts over the next decade. These include an extension of the 2017 Trump tax cuts, which are set to expire at the end of the year, as well as other tax proposals Trump championed during his campaign, such as eliminating taxes on tips, overtime pay, and Social Security benefits.

Spending Cut Compromise

To advance the budget proposal to this stage, Johnson had to concede to demands from some conservative lawmakers for $2 trillion in spending reductions. However, the exact details of these cuts will be determined later by various House committees.

For instance, the House Energy and Commerce Committee has been assigned the task of finding $880 billion in savings. Given that this committee oversees spending on major programs like Medicare and Medicaid, moderate Republicans worry that essential social safety net programs could be targeted for cuts.

Democrats quickly seized on these concerns, particularly regarding Medicaid, which serves low-income, elderly, and disabled Americans.

“The House Republican budget resolution will set in motion the largest Medicaid cut in American history,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., told reporters after the vote.

Ahead of Tuesday’s vote, several House members had expressed reservations. However, in the end, only one Republican, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, voted against the resolution.

On Monday, Massie voiced his opposition in a social media post, writing, “If the Republican budget passes, the deficit gets worse, not better.” His statement drew a response from billionaire Elon Musk, who replied, “That sounds bad.”

House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, credited Speaker Johnson for successfully rallying enough support to pass the resolution. Arrington acknowledged that there were multiple holdouts before the vote but said Johnson was instrumental in securing the outcome.

“I think that small margin forces you to work together,” Arrington said. “This was a historic election. We know this is a monumental opportunity for us to course correct, for us to reverse course on the last four years, to be frank, and nobody wants to miss that. And everybody had to make some sacrifice or some pain involved.”

Warren Buffett’s Secret to Success: The Power of an Inner Scorecard

February 26, 2025February 28, 2025 Staff ReporterMoney 0

Warren Buffett is widely regarded as one of the most accomplished investors in history, yet he does not gauge his success by his immense fortune. Instead, he follows what he calls an “inner scorecard”—a personal framework of values and principles that shape his decisions, regardless of external opinions.

The Decision Everyone Must Make

Unlike most people who measure their achievements based on external markers such as wealth or status, Buffett believes that true success stems from staying committed to one’s own values. According to him, focusing on how others perceive you can lead to prioritizing their approval over what genuinely matters.

Buffett’s philosophy extends beyond financial gains; he emphasizes three key values that serve as the foundation for a meaningful life and a strong career: integrity, honesty, and generosity. These principles, he argues, are essential for long-term fulfillment and professional success.

The Impact of Integrity

For Buffett, integrity is an absolute necessity. He has famously stated, “In looking for people to hire, you look for three qualities: integrity, intelligence, and energy. And if they don’t have the first one, the other two will kill you.”

But why is integrity so crucial? It fosters trust. When individuals consistently do what is right, they earn the confidence of clients, colleagues, and business partners. This trust leads to stronger relationships, increased opportunities, and doors opening in unexpected ways.

The Benefits of Honesty

Honesty is more than just a moral virtue—it is also a way to improve efficiency. Being truthful eliminates the need to cover up mistakes, fabricate half-truths, or constantly worry about being exposed. It allows individuals to stay focused, work more effectively, and approach tasks with greater confidence.

Furthermore, honesty enhances communication. When people are transparent, they avoid unnecessary disputes and misunderstandings, making teamwork and leadership significantly smoother.

How Generosity Fuels Success

Although generosity may not directly increase wealth, its positive ripple effects can enhance one’s career, reputation, and overall happiness.

Research indicates that giving to others leads to increased happiness. Studies have shown that individuals experience greater joy when they spend money on others rather than on themselves. This sense of fulfillment, in turn, motivates them to continue being generous.

Additionally, generosity strengthens personal and professional relationships. According to research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, acts of giving help people feel more connected, fostering deeper social bonds. Strong relationships create opportunities for collaboration, mentorship, and growth, ultimately contributing to success.

The Key Lesson

Buffett’s inner scorecard revolves around defining success from within rather than seeking external validation. Integrity, honesty, and generosity are invaluable tools for building both a lasting career and a meaningful life. Instead of chasing approval, focus on developing your character and values. If Warren Buffett’s approach has proven effective for him, it may very well work for you, too.

Swami Vivekananda’s Enduring Impact on America: A Celebration of His 1900 Visit

February 25, 2025February 27, 2025 Staff ReporterReligion 0

For most Americans at the turn of the 20th century, their first encounter with Swami Vivekananda was his speech at the Parliament of the World’s Religions in Chicago in 1893. Addressing the audience as “sisters and brothers,” the 30-year-old Hindu delegate immediately captured their attention. He spoke about Hinduism’s concept of the “oneness of existence,” introducing a spiritual philosophy that resonated deeply with Western audiences.

However, that speech was only the beginning of Vivekananda’s engagement with America. Seven years later, he returned, focusing exclusively on the West Coast and delivering lectures to thousands in California. His spiritual outreach was cut short by his untimely death in 1902 at the age of 39, yet his influence remains strong, particularly in the state where he believed he had given his best.

“He is our brand,” stated Swami Prasannatmananda, who leads the Vedanta Society of Berkeley. “His name is enough.”

In recognition of Vivekananda’s legacy, the Vedanta Society of Berkeley, in collaboration with the Indian consulate in San Francisco, is launching a yearlong celebration, marking 125 years since his visit. The inaugural event, scheduled for Saturday, February 22, will be a discussion among religious leaders at the First Unitarian Church of Oakland. This historic venue was where Vivekananda delivered eight lectures in 1900.

“I personally consider that place as a place of pilgrimage,” Prasannatmananda said.

A plaque on the pulpit and a chair inside the church commemorate Vivekananda’s presence there on February 25, 1900. His lectures at the church were arranged by Rev. Benjamin Fay Mills, who was the church’s spiritual leader at the time. Mills had first encountered Vivekananda at the 1893 Parliament and extended an invitation. Each of the eight lectures drew an audience of more than 2,000, with another 500 gathered outside, unable to enter.

Rev. Laurel Liefert, who now leads the First Unitarian Church, expressed amazement at the church’s role in allowing Vivekananda to speak at a time when few venues in Northern California would have done so. “1900 is a long time ago, so that’s amazing. That is just so powerful and very in keeping with who we want to be in the community,” she said.

During his speech, Vivekananda posed a profound question to the audience: “Where is the solution of this world?” He then offered an answer, urging people to turn inward. “Those who look outside will never find it; they must turn their eyes inward and find truth. Religion lives inside.”

Liefert admitted that she knew little about Vivekananda before joining the church, but she felt an immediate connection with his message. “When I picture Vivekananda in our pulpit, I picture that he’s just emanating light,” she said. She also reflected on her own role as a minister, stating, “For me as a minister, I always feel like I’m an instrument of something that is coming through me. And I just can’t even imagine what an instrument he was.”

Vivekananda’s teachings align closely with the church’s philosophy, which embraces a diverse congregation that includes Buddhists, Sufis, atheists, agnostics, humanists, and pagans. Liefert pointed out that his vision of multiple paths leading to the divine mirrors the Unitarian Church’s commitment to radical inclusivity.

Sarah Watts, a choir member and congregant at the church, echoed this sentiment. She believes that Unitarian Universalists owe much to Eastern spiritual thinkers like Vivekananda, who influenced the faith’s early leaders. “I am proud of a lot of the things that Unitarian Universalists have done in the past, standing up and saying, ‘Hey, you know what? The way we do things? You know we could do it differently, or look at it this way,’” she said.

Watts was drawn to the church by its emphasis on dialogue and mutual support among people with different beliefs. “I can have the beliefs I have, and other people can have theirs, and we can be in conversation. We can support each other,” she explained.

In his time, Vivekananda encouraged Christian Americans to peacefully coexist with people of different faiths. Liefert believes his message is still relevant today, though it requires an even deeper level of understanding. “Now we’re thinking we need to go beyond tolerance, and try to seek something deeper, like understanding,” she said. “I think that if he was alive today, he would get that right.”

Prasanna Vengadam, an English professor at Laney College and a Vedanta Society devotee, considers Vivekananda’s 1900 visit to be unparalleled. “There has been no Hindu who’s commanded this much respect, who’s given the most beautiful teachings, as Swami Vivekananda has, and I want to absolutely adore that,” she said.

Vengadam, who spoke about interfaith understanding at the 2006 Parliament of the World’s Religions, credits Vivekananda with giving Hindu Americans a strong sense of identity. “He’s given our community members here a strong foothold to stand on and to take pride in ourselves,” she said.

Having immigrated to the United States in the 1980s, Vengadam found that Vivekananda’s teachings provided her with the language to express her beliefs. She was raised in a Hindu household but also attended a Catholic convent school in Chennai, India. His philosophy helped her reconcile these influences.

Most importantly, his teachings shaped her approach to life, leading her to seek God in everyone she encounters. “He cannot be a ‘best kept secret,’” she said. “He cannot just sit in books. So at timely intervals, we’ve got to bring him out and say, ‘Hey people, we’ve got these teachings. Come over and listen to them. Please read this. Please know this.’”

She emphasized the need to keep his teachings alive so that more people can find spiritual fulfillment. “So reviving what he taught so that more people can gain more fulfillment and advancement in their own spiritual paths,” she said.

Vivekananda’s brief but impactful time in America continues to resonate, especially among those who see his philosophy as a guiding light for interfaith understanding and spiritual growth. The upcoming yearlong celebration in California is a testament to his lasting influence.

Trump Expresses Optimism on Ukraine War Resolution as Macron Stresses Caution

February 25, 2025February 27, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

President Donald Trump voiced optimism that Russia’s war in Ukraine is approaching a resolution as he met with French President Emmanuel Macron on Monday, marking the third anniversary of the invasion. However, Macron emphasized the importance of ensuring that any potential agreement with Moscow does not equate to Ukraine’s surrender.

The discussions took place amid significant uncertainty regarding the future of transatlantic relations, as Trump seeks to reshape American foreign policy. His approach has largely sidelined European leadership while he pursues a swift resolution to the conflict in Ukraine.

Although Trump and Macron displayed cordiality at the White House, their respective nations were engaged in a dispute at the United Nations over resolutions that labeled Russia as the aggressor in the war.

Addressing the broader conflict, Trump stated that he believed Russian President Vladimir Putin would be open to the presence of European peacekeepers in Ukraine.

“Yeah, he will accept it,” Trump said to reporters. “I have asked him that question. Look, if we do this deal, he’s not looking for more war.”

Trump also expressed hope that the war could conclude within weeks. He suggested that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy would soon travel to the United States to finalize an agreement allowing America access to Ukraine’s essential minerals, which are crucial for advanced technology.

The economic deal Trump is promoting is intended to compensate for some of the $180 billion in U.S. aid that has been allocated to Kyiv since the war began. A portion of these funds has been utilized domestically to replenish aging weapons that were supplied to Ukraine.

“It looks like we’re getting very close,” Trump said regarding the minerals deal before his meeting with Macron. He indicated that Zelenskyy might visit Washington this week or next to sign the agreement.

Ukraine’s Security Considerations

Ukraine is also seeking long-term security assurances as part of any settlement. However, Trump did not specify whether the developing agreement would include such commitments from the United States. Instead, he remarked, “Europe is going to make sure nothing happens.”

A French official familiar with the discussions between Macron and Trump indicated that the U.S. president did not oppose the idea of American security guarantees in a potential peace agreement, though the specifics were still being negotiated. The official spoke anonymously, as they were not authorized to comment publicly.

During a joint press conference, Macron acknowledged that European nations must increase their defense efforts but warned against conceding too much to Russia.

“This peace must not mean a surrender of Ukraine,” Macron asserted. “It must not mean a ceasefire without guarantees. This peace must allow for Ukrainian sovereignty.”

Macron had ceased direct communication with Putin after Russian forces carried out atrocities in the Kyiv suburb of Bucha early in the conflict. However, he stated that the situation had evolved and expressed hope that Trump’s engagement with Putin could lead to progress.

“Now, there is a big chance because there is a new U.S. administration, so this is a new context,” Macron said. “So there is good reason for President Trump to reengage with President Putin.”

Putin, however, stated on Monday that he had not discussed a detailed resolution to the conflict with Trump. Additionally, Russian and American negotiation teams had not delved into specifics when they met in Saudi Arabia last week.

Putin also mentioned that Russia was open to including European nations—who were initially excluded from the talks in Riyadh—in future peace negotiations.

A Shift in American Foreign Policy

The third anniversary of the war and the discussions at the White House occurred at a time of considerable unease in Europe. Trump’s administration has ushered in a drastic shift in U.S. foreign policy.

Trump has made bold territorial demands involving Greenland, Canada, Gaza, and the Panama Canal. Just over a month into his second term, his “America First” approach has raised concerns among diplomats and former government officials who previously viewed the United States as a pillar of global stability.

Despite occasional missteps, the United States’ military, economic, and diplomatic influence has defined the post-World War II era, particularly after the Soviet Union’s collapse ended the Cold War. Many fear that Trump’s strategy could dismantle these long-standing principles, including those that underpin the United Nations and other international institutions.

“The only conclusion you can draw is that 80 years of policy in standing up against aggressors has just been blown up without any sort of discussion or reflection,” said Ian Kelly, a former U.S. ambassador to Georgia during the Obama and first Trump administrations and currently a professor at Northwestern University.

Meetings with European Leaders

Trump is set to meet with another key European leader, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, on Thursday.

His approach to Ukraine has unsettled European allies, particularly his repeated criticism of Zelenskyy for not engaging in negotiations to end the war. Trump has also pushed for Ukraine to sign an economic deal granting the U.S. access to its vital mineral resources, which are valuable to American aerospace, medical, and technology industries.

Initially, Zelenskyy resisted the proposal, citing the lack of security guarantees. On Sunday, he wrote on X that “we are making great progress” but insisted that “we want a good economic deal that will be part of a true security guarantee system for Ukraine.”

During a public dispute, Trump accused Zelenskyy of residing in a “Russian-made disinformation space” and labeled him a “dictator,” falsely asserting that Kyiv had instigated the war. In reality, Russia invaded its smaller, less-equipped neighbor in February 2022.

When asked on Monday whether he considered Putin a dictator as well, Trump declined to use the term, stating, “I don’t use those words lightly.”

Differences Among Allies

While Macron and Trump engaged in discussions, including a virtual meeting with fellow Group of Seven (G7) leaders, the United States diverged from its European allies at the United Nations. The U.S. refrained from endorsing resolutions that explicitly blamed Russia for the invasion of Ukraine.

The United States ultimately abstained from voting on its own resolution after European countries, led by France, succeeded in amending it to explicitly identify Russia as the aggressor.

Before meeting with Trump, Macron emphasized that he would urge the U.S. president to recognize the shared interest of Americans and Europeans in not appearing weak in front of Putin.

“It’s not you, it’s not your trademark, it’s not in your interest,” Macron said. “How can you then be credible in the face of China if you’re weak in the face of Putin?”

Despite this stance, Trump has indicated his desire for Russia to rejoin the G7, from which it was expelled in 2014 following its annexation of Crimea.

“I really believe he wants to make a deal,” Trump said regarding Putin. “I may be wrong, but I believe he wants to make a deal.”

Vivek Ramaswamy Announces Candidacy for Ohio Governor with Promises of Economic and Education Reforms

February 25, 2025February 26, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

Vivek Ramaswamy, a Cincinnati-born biotech entrepreneur who stepped down from the Department of Government Efficiency initiative on President Donald Trump’s first day in office, launched his campaign for Ohio governor on Monday. He has pledged to introduce work requirements for Medicaid and implement merit-based pay for all public school educators and administrators.

At 39, Ramaswamy officially kicked off his campaign in Cincinnati, entering the 2026 Republican primary just weeks after presumed front-runner and then-Lt. Gov. Jon Husted withdrew to accept an appointment to the U.S. Senate.

Ramaswamy had previously pursued the Republican nomination for president in 2024 before suspending his campaign to support Trump. His loyalty to Trump earned him a role co-chairing the efficiency initiative alongside billionaire Elon Musk. Nearly a billionaire himself, Ramaswamy has actively highlighted his relationship with Trump while securing key endorsements and financial backers for his gubernatorial campaign. Trump formally endorsed Ramaswamy on social media Monday night.

“I spent most of last year working tirelessly to help send Donald Trump back to the White House because it was a fork in the road,” Ramaswamy declared to a cheering crowd. “It was a fork in the road for the future of the country.”

Trump, posting on his Truth Social platform, praised Ramaswamy as “something SPECIAL.”

“He’s Young, Strong, and Smart!” Trump wrote. “Vivek is also a very good person, who truly loves our Country. He will be a GREAT Governor of Ohio, will never let you down, and has my COMPLETE AND TOTAL ENDORSEMENT!”

Ramaswamy’s entrance into the race intensifies an already competitive Republican primary to succeed Gov. Mike DeWine, a 78-year-old center-right politician who is ineligible for re-election due to term limits.

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost had already announced his candidacy in January, while Heather Hill, a Black entrepreneur from Appalachia, is also in the running. Meanwhile, Dr. Amy Acton, the former Ohio health director who played a pivotal role in navigating the state through the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, is seeking the Democratic nomination.

The candidates will vie for the governorship in a state that, though once considered a political bellwether, has leaned solidly Republican in recent years. Trump secured Ohio in three consecutive elections by margins exceeding eight percentage points. The Republican Party also dominates statewide, holding all executive offices, a majority on the Ohio Supreme Court, and supermajorities in both legislative chambers.

At his campaign launch event, Ramaswamy promised to “end the war on work” by reinstating work requirements for Medicaid and other welfare programs.

He also vowed to eliminate income and property taxes, positioning Ohio as the first state to implement a merit-based compensation system for every teacher, principal, superintendent, and administrator.

Reflecting on Ohio’s industrial heyday, Ramaswamy recalled when the state was home to leading global industries such as glass, rubber, and steel. He argued that Ohio could reclaim its economic prominence, albeit in different sectors such as semiconductor manufacturing, nuclear energy, biotechnology, and cryptocurrency.

“I believe deep in my bones that Ohio can lead the way again,” he stated. “If Silicon Valley was at the leading edge of the American economy for the last 10 years, it will be the Ohio River Valley for the next 10 years.”

Shortly after Ramaswamy’s campaign announcement, Yost issued a pointed statement welcoming him to the race “for however long he sticks around.”

A practicing Hindu, Ramaswamy has outlined his 10 fundamental beliefs, first introduced during his presidential campaign. These include declarations such as “God is real” and “there are two genders,” themes central to his 2024 book, Truths: The Future of America First. He initially gained national recognition with his 2021 book, Woke Inc: Inside Corporate America’s Social Justice Scam, in which he criticized corporations for exploiting social justice causes to further self-serving agendas.

Ramaswamy’s gubernatorial run represents a departure from the conventional path to Ohio’s top executive office, which typically involves extensive government experience spanning decades. Instead, he is attempting a Trump-style ascent directly from the business world into high-level political office.

This strategy has proven effective in recent years for political newcomers such as Vice President JD Vance and U.S. Sen. Bernie Moreno. Both won Senate seats with Trump’s endorsement in 2022 and 2024, respectively. However, Ramaswamy will be the first to test this approach in a statewide executive race in Ohio in recent memory.

DeWine had previously passed over Ramaswamy when filling the Senate vacancy left by Vance, opting instead for Husted due to his extensive experience in public office. Husted, a former Ohio House speaker and secretary of state, had secured numerous key endorsements and major donors before suspending his gubernatorial bid. Now, many of those endorsements and donors are back in play.

While speculation about Ramaswamy’s candidacy had been circulating for some time, Yost entered the race early, likely anticipating the entrepreneur’s eventual announcement. Since then, Ramaswamy has gained endorsements from Ohio Treasurer Robert Sprague and Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose, strengthening his position in the race.

Indiaspora Forum for Good Kicks Off in Abu Dhabi, Fostering Global Collaboration

February 25, 2025February 26, 2025 Staff ReporterCommunity 0

The Indiaspora Forum for Good (IFG) commenced in Abu Dhabi on February 24, 2025, bringing together global leaders, diplomats, and changemakers at the Grand Hyatt to deliberate on critical global challenges and explore sustainable solutions.

Sheikh Nahyan bin Mubarak Al Nahyan, the UAE’s Minister of Tolerance and Coexistence, served as the chief guest and opened the summit by highlighting the significance of the gathering. He acknowledged the forum’s role in fostering dialogue and innovation, stating, “It is a delight to be in the presence of such imaginative, talented, and dedicated global leaders. This summit is a very important event because of its focus on the generation of ideas and the exchange of knowledge around the major issues facing the world.”

Sheikh Nahyan also acknowledged the notable contributions of the Indian diaspora in the UAE, emphasizing their integral role in society. He remarked that they bring “vitality” to the community and have earned “respect and prosperity” in their adopted homeland. The minister further underscored the importance of international cooperation, stating, “Our dialogue and cooperation within a global community encourage the development of new ideas and initiatives that will benefit everyone. Your presence here in Abu Dhabi is an indication of the special relationship between our two countries,” reinforcing the strengthening ties between India and the UAE.

Raj Subramaniam, CEO of FedEx and a member of the host committee for the event, spoke about the necessity of fostering a sustainable ecosystem for connections, particularly as India’s global presence continues to expand. He recalled how the international business community, particularly Indian-origin CEOs, came together to support India during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. He detailed how he utilized FedEx’s logistical capabilities to ensure the transportation of crucial life-saving medical equipment.

Subramaniam highlighted this collaboration as a testament to the power of collective action during crises. Encouraging participants to maximize their impact, he said, “With this community, make one plus one ten. It’s that ecosystem we’re talking about here—how do we connect in a way that makes us more sustainable, especially in an environment where the opportunity for India, for the Indian community, and the Indian diaspora is only increasing.”

Sunjay Sudhir, India’s Ambassador to the UAE, reflected on the evolving global perception of India and the role of the diaspora in shaping this image. He commended the contributions of Indian-origin individuals, stating, “I must acknowledge your (diaspora’s) contribution to the growing role and image of India. You are not mere witnesses. Actually, you are the participants in this growing brand. India counts on you.”

He emphasized that over the past decade, India’s global reputation has undergone a major transformation. Beyond being recognized as the world’s fastest-growing major economy, the country is increasingly viewed as a “factor of peace and progress” in global affairs.

The ambassador also highlighted the UAE’s strategic significance for India, calling it “India’s strongest strategic partner in the Middle East.” He praised the UAE for its remarkable evolution from an oil-dependent economy to a hub of innovation, artificial intelligence, and global business. He described the nation as a “magnet for global businesses and the diaspora,” reflecting its increasing appeal for professionals and entrepreneurs alike.

Sudhir further commended UAE-led initiatives such as the Ministry of Tolerance, which played a crucial role in the establishment of the BAPS Hindu Mandir in Abu Dhabi. The temple has since become an essential cultural landmark, drawing millions of visitors and serving as a testament to the country’s commitment to inclusivity.

Indiaspora founder MR Rangaswami shared his personal experiences at the event, reflecting on moments that demonstrated the selfless service of the Indian community. He recounted his visit to the Maha Kumbh and the newly inaugurated BAPS temple in Abu Dhabi, where he was deeply moved by the dedication of volunteers. “All I saw there was selfless service by our community,” he noted, underscoring how the spirit of giving is ingrained in Indian culture.

Discussing the origins of Indiaspora, Rangaswami recalled, “When I started Indiaspora 13 years ago, it was just an idea in my mind. But soon, I found others who believed in this cause.” He acknowledged the founding members who played a pivotal role in shaping the organization into the influential network it has become today. He revealed that more than 400 individuals actively fund Indiaspora’s philanthropic activities, demonstrating a collective commitment to social impact.

Rangaswami also paid tribute to his late nephew, Sreenivas, who was instrumental in naming Indiaspora and shaping its initial vision. He explained that the organization’s name is a blend of “India” and “diaspora,” with the middle three letters, “dia,” signifying “light in the darkness.” Sreenivas’s passing due to brain cancer was a tragic loss, but his legacy remains a fundamental part of Indiaspora’s journey.

Highlighting the power of networking, Rangaswami emphasized the strength of the 300 million-strong Indian diaspora worldwide. He pointed out that professionals across various sectors—including medicine, law, arts, business, and academia—contribute significantly to the community’s global influence. He stressed the importance of building a lasting legacy for future generations and acknowledged the presence of young voices at the forum. “About 40 young leaders are here as part of the next generation of Indiaspora’s movement,” he noted, indicating a commitment to empowering emerging leaders.

The Indiaspora Forum for Good has drawn participation from hundreds of delegates representing more than 30 countries. Over the course of the forum, discussions will focus on fostering greater collaboration within the global Indian community, shaping India’s future engagement with the world, and driving positive change across borders.

Indian Cardinals Among Electors in Future Papal Conclave as Pope Francis Remains Hospitalized

February 24, 2025February 25, 2025 Staff ReporterReligion 0

As Pope Francis continues to receive medical care at Rome’s Gemelli Hospital, discussions surrounding the future leadership of the Catholic Church have gained momentum.

While the Vatican has reassured the public that the Pope’s condition is stable, his advanced age and prior health challenges have led to increased preparations for the possibility of a papal conclave.

Should a conclave be convened, 138 cardinals under the age of 80 will be eligible to cast their votes, including four representatives from India.

The Four Indian Cardinals Eligible to Vote

Among those who will participate in the selection of the next pope are four Indian cardinals, each bringing distinct experience and perspectives to the process.

Cardinal Filipe Neri Ferrão, 72, serves as the Archbishop of Goa and Daman. He is widely recognized for his efforts in promoting social justice and fostering interreligious dialogue.

Cardinal Cleemis Baselios, 64, holds the position of Major Archbishop-Catholicos of the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church. He was elevated to the rank of cardinal in 2012, further strengthening India’s presence in the Church’s leadership.

Cardinal Anthony Poola, 63, made history as India’s first Dalit cardinal. His work primarily focuses on uplifting marginalized communities and advocating for their rights within the Church.

Cardinal George Jacob Koovakad, 51, brings diplomatic expertise to the conclave. As a Vatican diplomat and Syro-Malabar archbishop, he has played a key role in organizing the Pope’s international visits.

The Papal Conclave Process

In the event of Pope Francis’ resignation or passing, the process of selecting a new pontiff will take place in the Sistine Chapel, following time-honored traditions that have been observed for centuries.

The proceedings begin with all voting cardinals swearing an oath of secrecy. Once inside the conclave, they are completely cut off from the outside world to ensure confidentiality in the decision-making process.

Voting is conducted in multiple rounds, with each cardinal writing down the name of their chosen candidate on a ballot. To be elected as the new pope, a candidate must secure a two-thirds majority of the votes.

After each round of voting, the ballots are burned in a special stove within the chapel. If no candidate secures the required majority, black smoke is released from the chimney, signaling that deliberations will continue. Once a decision is made and a pope is chosen, white smoke rises, and the newly elected pontiff is introduced to the world with the traditional Latin announcement: “Habemus Papam,” which translates to “We have a Pope.”

India’s presence in the Catholic Church has grown steadily over the years, with its cardinals playing an active role in past papal elections. During the 2013 conclave that led to the selection of Pope Francis, Indian cardinals, including Oswald Gracias and Baselios Cleemis, were instrumental in the voting process.

With four Indian cardinals now set to participate in the next conclave, their role in shaping the future leadership of the Church is more significant than ever before.

Conservatives Win Narrow Victory in Germany as Far-Right AfD Sees Historic Surge

February 24, 2025February 25, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

The opposition conservatives, led by Friedrich Merz, secured a modest victory in Germany’s election on Sunday, while the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) saw its support double, marking the strongest performance for an extreme-right party since World War II, according to projections.

Chancellor Olaf Scholz acknowledged defeat for his center-left Social Democrats, calling it “a bitter election result.” Projections from ARD and ZDF public television indicated that his party had finished in third place, marking its worst postwar performance in a national parliamentary election.

Merz expressed his intention to form a coalition government by Easter, though assembling such an alliance is expected to be challenging.

A Discontented Electorate

The election was held seven months ahead of schedule after Scholz’s unpopular coalition collapsed in November. His three-year tenure had been plagued by internal divisions, leading to widespread dissatisfaction among voters. However, there was little enthusiasm for any of the candidates.

Key concerns during the campaign included the prolonged economic stagnation in Europe’s largest economy and the pressure to control migration. Merz, in recent weeks, had strongly advocated for stricter immigration policies, fueling debate. Additionally, uncertainty surrounding Ukraine’s future and Europe’s alliance with the United States added to voter concerns.

As the most populous country in the European Union and a leading NATO member, Germany plays a crucial role in shaping Europe’s responses to global challenges. It has been the second-largest supplier of weapons to Ukraine, following the United States. The outcome of the election is expected to influence Germany’s stance on issues such as U.S. foreign policy under a potential new Trump administration.

According to projections based on exit polls and preliminary results, Merz’s Union bloc garnered around 28.5% of the vote, while the anti-immigration AfD received approximately 20.5%—nearly double its 2021 result.

Scholz’s Social Democrats managed just over 16%, significantly lower than their previous election performance and worse than their postwar low of 20.5% in 2017. The Greens, who had been part of the outgoing coalition government, secured about 12%.

Among the smaller parties, the hard-left Left Party showed resilience, making a comeback with up to 9% of the vote. The pro-business Free Democrats, also a part of the collapsed government, appeared poised to lose their parliamentary representation, with support hovering around 4.5%. Meanwhile, the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW) was on the brink of the 5% threshold required to enter parliament.

Merz Faces Tough Road Ahead

The ability of Merz to form a coalition government depends on whether he can secure a majority with the Social Democrats or if a second partner, likely the Greens, will be necessary. The inclusion of the BSW in parliament could also influence coalition dynamics.

“The most important thing is to reestablish a viable government in Germany as quickly as possible,” Merz emphasized.

“I am aware of the responsibility,” he stated. “I am also aware of the scale of the task that now lies ahead of us. I approach it with the utmost respect, and I know that it will not be easy.”

Merz also warned that prolonged coalition negotiations would be detrimental. “The world out there isn’t waiting for us, and it isn’t waiting for long-drawn-out coalition talks and negotiations,” he told his cheering supporters.

Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck, the Greens’ candidate for chancellor, urged Merz to adopt a more moderate approach following an intense campaign.

“We have seen the center is weakened overall, and everyone should look at themselves and ask whether they didn’t contribute to that,” Habeck remarked. “Now he must see that he acts like a chancellor.”

Despite its role in Scholz’s unpopular administration, the Greens fared relatively well compared to their coalition partners. Matthias Miersch, the Social Democrats’ general secretary, admitted that their defeat had been long in the making. “This election wasn’t lost in the last eight weeks,” he observed.

A Triumphant Yet Isolated Far-Right Party

AfD co-leader Tino Chrupalla celebrated the party’s historic gains, addressing enthusiastic supporters. “We have achieved something historic today,” he declared.

“We are now the political center and we have left the fringes behind us,” Chrupalla asserted. AfD’sprevious best result was 12.6% in 2017 when it first entered parliament.

Alice Weidel, AfD’s candidate for chancellor, signaled the party’s openness to coalition talks with Merz’s conservatives. “We are open for coalition negotiations” with the Union, she said, adding, “Otherwise, no change of policy is possible in Germany.”

However, Merz and other mainstream leaders have consistently rejected working with AfD, and he reiterated this stance in a televised discussion with Weidel and other political leaders after the election.

Weidel suggested that AfD would not need to compromise much in any theoretical coalition, arguing that the Union had largely adopted its policies. She dismissed Merz’s victory as hollow, stating, “It won’t be able to implement it with left-wing parties.”

She predicted instability if Merz formed an alliance with the Social Democrats and the Greens. “It will be an unstable government that doesn’t last four years, there will be an interim Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and in the coming years, we will overtake the Union,” Weidel claimed.

Merz dismissed the possibility of a coalition with AfD, emphasizing that their policy positions were fundamentally at odds. “We have fundamentally different views, for example, on foreign policy, on security policy, in many other areas, regarding Europe, the euro, NATO,” he stated.

“You want the opposite of what we want, so there will be no cooperation,” he added.

Scholz also condemned AfD’s rising influence, asserting, “That must never be something that we will accept. I will not accept it and never will.”

The election saw more than 59 million eligible voters participate in choosing the 630 members of the Bundestag, Germany’s lower house of parliament, who will take their seats under the iconic glass dome of Berlin’s Reichstag building.

Pakistan Hosts Champions Trophy After Decades, But India’s Absence Looms Large

February 24, 2025February 25, 2025 Staff ReporterSports 0

Jet fighters soared over a packed stadium in southern Pakistan, painting the sky with the green and white hues of the national flag, adding a grand spectacle to a sporting event the country had been longing to host for a generation.

The two competing teams made their way into the National Stadium in Karachi, greeted by a thunderous cheer from the crowd, marking the commencement of the Champions Trophy tournament. Cricket-loving Pakistan views this event as a crucial step in re-establishing its position in the global cricketing community.

For years, Pakistan has been excluded from hosting international tournaments due to persistent Islamist militancy and terror attacks, including a devastating assault on Sri Lanka’s cricket team in 2009. However, with cricket powerhouses such as Australia, Bangladesh, England, New Zealand, and South Africa now participating in the three-week-long tournament, local fans are elated.

Authorities in Karachi took stringent security measures for the opening match between Pakistan and New Zealand on Wednesday. Snipers were stationed on rooftops along the routes leading to the stadium, while commandos and SWAT teams monitored checkpoints across the vast port city.

Farah Qadri, who endured hours under the scorching sun while navigating security checkpoints outside the stadium, described the experience of witnessing the opening game as “surreal” and well worth the wait.

“There were people from all walks of life huddled together, cheering, chanting, and dancing nonstop,” she shared with CNN.

For Basit Ali, a 36-year-old cricket enthusiast watching the match from a teashop in Peshawar near the Afghan border, the tournament signified a positive development for the entire nation.

“I pray that Pakistan successfully defends its title and brings joy to the nation,” he said.

In Pakistan, cricket is more than just a sport—it holds a status akin to a second religion. National team players are celebrated like superstars, their images plastered across billboards. The team’s performance often dictates the public’s mood, oscillating between immense pride and intense frustration.

However, the last time Pakistan hosted an international cricket tournament was in 1996. As a result, an entire generation in the country, which boasts a population of approximately 220 million, has grown up without experiencing the thrill of welcoming the world’s top cricketing nations.

Farees Shah, a cricket podcast host who was among the crowd at the Karachi stadium on Wednesday, described a mixture of excitement and nervousness.

“It’s like you’re the biggest party animal out there, but after ages, you’re hosting the party, so you just want to make sure everything goes smoothly,” he told CNN.

Pakistan is no stranger to challenges off the cricket pitch.

Former Prime Minister Imran Khan, a World Cup-winning cricketer, remains behind bars on charges of corruption and revealing official secrets—accusations he claims are politically motivated efforts to prevent his return to power.

Meanwhile, the country’s economy teeters on the brink, heavily reliant on International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailouts. Critics argue that the powerful military maintains a strong grip over all aspects of life.

Pakistan has also endured a prolonged Taliban insurgency that has claimed tens of thousands of lives. Additionally, authorities continue to battle a violent separatist movement in the resource-rich southwestern region.

Cricket has not been immune to this turmoil.

In 2009, Sri Lanka’s national cricket team was ambushed by militants while en route to a match in Lahore. Gunmen sprayed the team’s bus with bullets as it approached the stadium, killing six policemen and two civilians. Several visiting players were injured, sending shockwaves throughout the cricketing world.

In the aftermath of that attack, Pakistan was stripped of its hosting rights for the 2009 Champions Trophy. Another militant attack later led to the country’s exclusion from co-hosting the 2011 World Cup.

Hosting this year’s Champions Trophy marks a “milestone moment” for Pakistan, said Mohsin Naqvi, chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), in a statement to CNN.

The tournament, he emphasized, provides “an opportunity to reaffirm Pakistan’s status as one of the most passionate and influential cricketing nations, fully capable of staging multi-nation tournaments at the highest level.”

Authorities are making every effort to ensure the smooth execution of the event.

Pakistan’s national airline has scheduled special flights to transport visiting teams between match locations. Moreover, authorities have granted “state guest status” to all players and match officials, treating them with the same level of hospitality typically reserved for foreign heads of state.

The Elephant in the Room

Despite the enthusiasm surrounding the tournament, one significant absence looms large.

India, the world’s top-ranked cricket team and Pakistan’s fiercest rival, has opted not to participate on Pakistani soil.

Citing “security reasons,” Indian cricket officials have refused to send their team to Pakistan. Instead, India’s matches will be played in the United Arab Emirates.

This decision has disappointed fans worldwide and angered Pakistani supporters, who have been deprived of the chance to witness a high-stakes India-Pakistan clash on home turf.

Since gaining independence from Britain in 1947, nuclear-armed India and Pakistan have fought three wars. The two nations have imposed strict restrictions on trade and cross-border movement, despite sharing deep historical, cultural, and linguistic ties—not to mention an undying passion for cricket.

India-Pakistan cricket matches are among the most highly anticipated sporting events globally, attracting massive sponsorship deals and widespread media coverage.

In the 2017 Champions Trophy final, an estimated 400 million viewers tuned in to watch Pakistan defeat India. By comparison, viewership for the most recent Super Bowl was significantly lower, drawing approximately 127 million spectators.

Naqvi, the PCB chairman, lamented India’s absence, calling it “a loss for spectators, broadcasters, media, and the tournament itself.”

“But it is also a missed opportunity for Indian players to experience the warmth, love, and hospitality that Pakistan has always extended to visiting teams,” he added.

CNN reached out to India’s cricket board for comment but received no response.

Despite India’s absence, for cricket fan Basit Ali in Peshawar, the most anticipated moment of the tournament remains Pakistan’s upcoming match against India—even if it will take place in Dubai rather than in Pakistan.

“The real excitement will be when Pakistan faces India. I can’t wait for that!” he said.

Farees Shah, the cricket podcast host, echoed this sentiment, saying he wanted “nothing more than Pakistan cricket to do well.”

“It is equally important to me that the tournament goes effortlessly,” he added.

Judge Rejects Union Request to Halt Trump Administration’s Federal Workforce Cuts

February 23, 2025February 25, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

A federal judge on Thursday declined a request from a coalition of government employee unions to prevent the Trump administration from proceeding with significant reductions to the federal workforce.

U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled that federal law requires the unions to bring their case before the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA), which handles labor disputes within the federal government, rather than pursuing legal action in a federal district court.

The ruling marks another legal victory for the Trump administration’s Justice Department, which has been defending against multiple lawsuits challenging various executive orders, including those aimed at reducing government spending and restructuring federal agencies.

“The first month of President Trump’s second administration has been defined by an onslaught of executive actions that have caused, some say by design, disruption and even chaos in widespread quarters of American society,” Cooper wrote.

He further noted, “Affected citizens and their advocates have challenged many of these actions on an emergency basis in this Court and others across the country. Certain of the President’s actions have been temporarily halted; others have been permitted to proceed, at least for the time being. These mixed results should surprise no one.”

The unions’ lawsuit contested the administration’s decision to terminate a large number of probationary employees, its broader plans for additional layoffs—commonly referred to as a reduction in force—and its offer of buyouts to most federal employees.

A separate lawsuit previously sought to block the buyouts but was dismissed by another federal judge. However, litigation concerning the dismissal of probationary employees remains ongoing, as a coalition of unions filed a new lawsuit on Thursday to challenge those terminations.

The case was brought by several unions, including the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), the National Federation of Federal Employees, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, and the United Auto Workers.

These unions argued that the administration’s workforce reduction strategy violates both the constitutional separation of powers and the established regulations governing how federal job cuts should be carried out.

Cooper did not weigh in on the merits of these claims, instead determining that the unions had filed their challenge in the incorrect venue.

“The Court acknowledges that district court review of these sweeping executive actions may be more expedient. But NTEU provides no reason why it could not seek relief from the FLRA on behalf of a class of plaintiffs and admits that it would ask other agencies to follow an administrative judge’s ruling in its favor,” Cooper wrote.

Meanwhile, President Trump recently dismissed Susan Grundmann, the Democratic-appointed chair of the FLRA. Grundmann, however, is contesting her removal in court.

Kash Patel Confirmed as FBI Director Amid Democratic Opposition and Concerns Over Independence

February 23, 2025February 24, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

The Republican-led Senate voted on Thursday to confirm Kash Patel as the new director of the FBI, despite ongoing concerns regarding his qualifications and temperament to lead the country’s most influential law enforcement agency.

Patel, a staunch ally of former President Donald Trump and a vocal critic of the FBI, secured confirmation with a narrow 51-49 vote. Republican Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski broke ranks with their party and joined all Democrats in opposing his appointment.

His confirmation marks a significant milestone in Patel’s career, which has included roles as a public defender, federal prosecutor, and congressional aide. During Trump’s first term, he served as a national security official and later became a prominent figure in right-wing media, frequently appearing on conservative podcasts while maintaining strong loyalty to Trump.

Republicans embraced Patel’s confirmation, arguing that the FBI has unfairly targeted conservatives in recent years and that Patel is the right person to address these concerns.

“Kash is the right man to clean up the FBI to restore Americans’ confidence and trust that the FBI is not a political organization, it is a law enforcement organization,” Senator Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., stated in a post on X.

Despite Republican backing, Patel’s confirmation faced intense resistance from Democrats, who questioned his ability—and willingness—to uphold the FBI’s traditional independence from the White House.

The slim margin of his confirmation vote underscored these concerns. In contrast, his three immediate predecessors—Christopher Wray, James Comey, and Robert Mueller—all received overwhelming bipartisan support, each securing at least 92 votes in their confirmations.

Democrats Highlight “Red Flags”

On Thursday morning, Senate Democrats from the Judiciary Committee gathered outside FBI headquarters to publicly denounce Patel’s appointment.

“Mr. Patel will be a political and national security disaster, if confirmed,” warned Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, the committee’s top Democrat.

“I’m convinced he has neither the experience, the judgment nor the temperament to lead the FBI,” Durbin continued. “My Senate Republican colleagues are willfully ignoring myriad red flags about Mr. Patel, especially his recurring instinct to threaten retribution against his perceived enemies. This is an extremely dangerous flaw for someone who seeks to lead the nation’s most powerful domestic investigative agency for the next 10 years.”

Historically, FBI directors are appointed to serve a 10-year term, but neither of Patel’s most recent predecessors completed theirs. Trump dismissed James Comey in 2017 and subsequently appointed Christopher Wray to replace him.

Following Trump’s election victory last November, he nominated Patel to take over the FBI, effectively forcing Wray out of the position.

Unlike Comey and Wray, Patel has no prior experience as a senior law enforcement official, a factor that has fueled doubts about his qualifications for the role.

However, opposition to his nomination has been more centered on his allegiance to Trump and his past remarks about dismantling what he refers to as the “deep state.” Critics have raised concerns over his rhetoric about targeting political opponents, including those within the FBI.

During one podcast appearance, Patel vowed to shut down FBI headquarters on his first day and convert it into a “museum of the deep state.”

During his confirmation hearing, Patel attempted to downplay concerns regarding his past statements, telling senators, “Any accusations leveled against me that I would somehow put political bias before the Constitution are grotesquely unfair.”

A Bureau in Transition

Patel assumes leadership of the FBI at a turbulent moment for the agency. In recent weeks, the newly installed Justice Department leadership has forced out at least eight senior FBI officials and demanded a list of all personnel involved in investigating the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol—a probe that Trump and his allies have repeatedly criticized.

These developments have sparked fears within the bureau that mass firings could be imminent as part of a broader retaliation effort. The FBI Agents Association (FBIAA), which represents most FBI agents, has taken legal action to block the release of names of FBI employees who were identified to the Justice Department.

Despite the tensions, the association acknowledged Patel’s confirmation on Thursday.

“We look forward to partnering with him as he leads the Bureau forward in our shared mission to keep America safe,” FBIAA President Natalie Bara said in a statement.

“As the new leadership team considers and implements reform measures, the FBIAA stands ready to serve as a valuable resource, ensuring that Special Agents can continue safeguarding the American people from emerging threats while upholding the Constitution.”

Haley Criticizes Trump Over Ukraine Comments, Calls Remarks “Russian Talking Points”

February 23, 2025February 24, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

Former Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley took issue with President Trump’s recent remarks about Ukraine and its leader, Volodymyr Zelensky. She criticized Trump for his stance on the ongoing war in Eastern Europe and his negative comments about Zelensky, calling them “classic Russian talking points” and “exactly what Putin wants.”

On Tuesday, Trump appeared to place blame on Zelensky and Ukraine’s leadership for the war, which is now nearing its third anniversary. The following day, he reinforced his criticism, stating that Zelensky had done a “terrible job” leading the embattled country. Trump also accused Ukraine’s president of exploiting Washington, pointing to the extensive financial aid the U.S. has provided over the past three years.

Haley, who withdrew from the 2024 race and later endorsed Trump, took issue with his statements. As a strong advocate for U.S. foreign policy interests, she has consistently supported Ukraine and has argued that aiding Kyiv aligns with America’s national security priorities.

Trump’s criticisms of Zelensky coincided with a meeting in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, where U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and national security adviser Mike Waltz, engaged in discussions with Russian representatives. The talks aimed to explore potential peace negotiations and a re-establishment of diplomatic relations, which had weakened following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Notably, Ukraine was not represented in the meeting.

The following day, Trump escalated his attacks, referring to Zelensky as a “dictator” and accusing him of failing to hold nationwide elections. He also claimed that Zelensky’s approval rating had plummeted to single digits. However, under Ukraine’s martial law, elections are not permitted. A survey published Wednesday by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology indicated that 57 percent of Ukrainians still trust their president.

Zelensky did not remain silent in the face of Trump’s remarks. In response to Trump’s Tuesday comments, he fired back, stating that the former U.S. president was operating within a Russian “disinformation space.”

Haley’s criticism of Trump aligns with her longstanding foreign policy views. Since joining the Hudson Institute think tank after exiting the presidential race, she has maintained that supporting Ukraine is vital to U.S. interests. She has also voiced her backing for Ukraine’s eventual inclusion in NATO, further underscoring her commitment to Kyiv.

Trump’s recent remarks on Ukraine have not only drawn pushback from Haley but also from his former vice president and one-time 2024 primary rival, Mike Pence.

“Mr. President, Ukraine did not ‘start’ this war. Russia launched an unprovoked and brutal invasion claiming hundreds of thousands of lives. The Road to Peace must be built on the Truth,” Pence stated in a pointed message on Wednesday.

Some Republican senators have also expressed concerns over Trump’s rhetoric. Many have defended Zelensky’s leadership, emphasizing that Russia was the aggressor in 2022, eight years after annexing Crimea.

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who recently traveled to Kyiv with Senate Democrats, acknowledged Zelensky’s challenges but praised his leadership. “Zelensky is frustrated, but he’s also been the right head of state for the time. He’s kept a nation together focused on Russian occupiers, and I think we should give them a fair amount of credit for that work,” Tillis said.

Indo-American Press Club Unveils 2025 Board of Directors and Appoints Dr. Indranill Basu Ray as Chairman

February 20, 2025February 20, 2025 Ajay GhoshCommunity, India, India, USA 0

(New York, NY: Feb 20, 2025) Indo-American Press Club (IAPC), the largest organization of media personnel of Indian origin in North America announced a dynamic Team of members to the Board of Directors today. Dr. Indranill Basu Ray – Cambridge, MA will lead this decade-old organization as the Chairman of the BOAD of IAPC. Ginsmon Zacharia, the Founding Chairman of IAPC is the Secretary of BOD. Ajay Ghosh, the Founding President of IAPC, who along with Ginsmon is a permanent member of the BOD, will serve as a member of the BOD.

Dr. Indranill Basu Ray – Chairman, Cambridge, MA

Dr. Indranill Basu Ray | MBBS, MD(Med), DNB (Card), DSc, FACP, FACC is a Cardiologist trained in one of the newer subspecialties called Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology. Dr. Basu-Ray was a faculty guide at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT’s) LinQ program in Boston. He is a cardiac electrophysiologist on staff and the present director of cardiovascular research at the Memphis Veterans Medical Center in Memphis, TN, USA. He is also an Adjunct Professor at The School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.

Dr. Basu-Ray is the Editor of a popular book on Cardiology with over forty authors contributing to it from all over the world. He is the founder and President of the American Academy for Yoga in Medicine, an organization of physicians, scientists, and researchers who work on scientific validation of yoga as an integrative therapy. He is the Editor-in-Chief of the world’s first reference book written by over 75 physicians and researchers worldwide called “The Principle and Practice of Yoga in Cardiovascular Diseases,” published by Springer Nature. Dr. Basu Ray has delivered invited lectures worldwide on the role of Yoga and meditation in preventing and treating cardiovascular diseases. He was awarded a Doctorate in Science (Honoris Causa) by the world’s largest and oldest Yoga University- SVYASA, in Bengaluru, India. He has appeared on multiple television channels in this country and abroad, discussing Yoga as disease prevention. He writes blogs for numerous Indian and US Newspapers.

⁠Ginsmon Zacharia – Board Secretary – NY

Ginsmon P. Zacharia, founding chairman and a permanent member of the IAPC Board of Directors, is the managing director of the Global Reporter Channel. A noted journalist who has made innovations in the field of visual media, he is also the chairman of Jai Hind News, a Malayalam newspaper with editions in the United States and Canada. He is the editor-in-chief of Aksharam magazine, a leading Malayalam magazine in the United States, and President and CEO of the English language magazine Asian Era. Ginsmon, who was the manager of The South Asian Times, a leading English language newspaper in America, started his journalism career 16 years ago by taking charge of the European edition of the Deepika, a Malayalam daily. As the US director of Jai Hind TV, he hosted the first reality show with candidates from all the states in the US. The reality show, attended by hundreds of Malayalees, was telecast in around 250 episodes, helped many amateur singers showcase their talent to the world, and was hailed as a historic first for the Malayalees in North America.

Kamalesh Mehta – NY

Kamlesh Mehta, founder of Forsyth Media Group, the most popular Indo-American English media group in North America, is a member of a prominent Jain family in Rajasthan and started a diamond business in Bombay in 1985. Mehta immigrated to New York in 1986, to expand his business, where he started trading in gemstones and diamonds. Mehta entered the media business in 2008, and his weekly newspaper, ‘The South Asian Times’ for the Indian community, has won several awards. He is also the publisher of Forsyth Media Group’s ‘The Asian Era’. In January 2010, he was appointed director of business and economic development by the Nassau County administration, where he served for five years. In 2009, he became president of the Rotary Club of Hicksville South, NY. In 2015-16, he had the opportunity to become governor of RI District 7255. He has been honored as a leading Rotary donor and has worked for many religious organizations and social causes. He is the founder of the Rajasthan Association of North America and organized the first Indian Day Parade in Hicksville, which started in 2012. Mehta is also the recipient of many lifetime achievement awards and certificates of recognition from various community organizations.

⁠Dr. Mathew Joys – Las Vegas, NV

Well-known writer and columnist in North America, Dr. Matthew Joys, was one of the early members of the IAPC. He has worked in the finance department of the central government in India and has been the director of the Rotaract Club and the national general secretary of the Employees Federation. He also served as executive vice president and secretary to the board of directors of IAPC. Author of ‘Entey Priyey,’ a collection of love poems based on the Bible and the Ten Commandments, and the anthology ‘American Aadukal,’ he spends his time as the executive editor of Jai Hind, a New York-based newspaper, as well as the associate editor of the Express Herald, a member of the editorial board of Nerkazhcha weekly, and the English portal The UNN. He is also the Global Media Chairperson of the Global Indian Council, Inc.

Ajay Ghosh – CT

Ajay Ghosh, the Chief Editor of The Universal News Network (www.theunn.com), graduated with a Master’s Degree in Journalism from Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI in 1998. Before coming to the United States, Ajay was the Chief Editor of The Voice Delhi and contributed articles to several national publications in India. In the United States, starting his journalistic career as a reporter in 1999 for India Post, he worked as the New York Bureau Chief of Indian Reporter and World News and was the New York Bureau Chief of India Tribune published from Chicago. Ajay served as the Executive Editor of NRI Today and was the Bureau Chief of The Indian Express, North American Editions. He was the founding Editor of The Asian Era. Since 2012, Ajay has been serving as the Media Coordinator of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI). In 2023, he was appointed as the Consultant for Public Relations Content for ITServe Alliance, the largest association of IT Solutions and services organizations in the United States. Ajay is the founder and President of the Indo-American Press Club.

Having a Master’s Degree in Social Work from Delhi University, Ajay served as an Adjunct Faculty at Fordham Graduate School of Social Work from 2006 to 2016. He was an Adjunct Professor at Bridgeport University, where he taught Psychology. In 2019, he was part of a nearly 200-member expedition to Antarctica, the 7th Continent on Earth. Ajay was honored with the Excellence in Reporting Award by the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin for several years. In 2018, Ajay was honored with the Excellence in Journalism Award by NAMAM, In 2023, he received the prestigious Excellence in Journalism Award by The Kerala Center in New York.

Meena Chittilapilly – Dallas, TX

Meena Chittilappilly is a well-known socio-cultural media activist from Dallas, Texas. Meena, who has been a presenter and newsreader on Asianet for 15 years and later a presenter on Jai Hind TV, is currently working for Flowers TV. A graduate with a degree in analytical economics and business administration, Meena has worked in the field of education for over 20 years and is currently working as a school director in the project management office at ‘Quantiphi’, an international software company. She was also active as the arts and marketing and branding chairperson of the Malayali Engineers Association of North Texas (MEANT), and the president of the Dallas badminton club. Moreover, she has been running the Swarajathi School of Music and Dance since 2001 and is an active organizer and media personality who has been making her mark in the professional theater industry. During her college years, she was the secretary and union councilor of the All-Saints College arts club, Thiruvananthapuram from 1990-92 and presented many programs as an anchor with Doordarshan, the national television channel of India.

⁠CG Daniel – Houston, TX

CG Daniel is a well-known writer and amateur photographer with a large following, especially on social media. He is an environmentalist and a cynophile. He has participated in television panel discussions about American and Indian politics. He is the founder, president, and CEO of the Deepalaya Foundation Inc., USA, a nonprofit charitable organization. He has served the IAPC at various levels, including as chapter president, national vice president, and general secretary.

Parveen Chopra – Vice Chairman – NY

Parveen Chopra, who has been a journalist in the United States for decades, is the managing editor of the South Asian Times. He also works for the interfaith journal ‘One World Under One God’. Parveen holds a master’s degree in mass communication from Punjab University and has also worked for India Today magazine. Parveen is also the founder of Spiritual Magazine Life Positive and was a former president of IAPC.

Dr. P V Baiju – Edmonton, Canada

A well-known Canadian author and columnist. P.V. Baiju is a noted journalist who has presented the issues of Canadian Malayalees to the world through his columns.

Jacob Kudasanad – Houston

Jacob Kudassanad (Kuruvila), the founding Vice President of the Houston chapter of Indo American Press Club, is a long-standing member of the organization. Through his time in IAPC, he has also been able to serve as the National Secretary in 2018 and National Executive Vice President in 2019.

He began his journalistic activities in his college days, where he got the chance to be the Alleppy district representative for All Kerala Sahitya Sangam. He also served as the editor for his college’s magazine, as well as various other local magazines. During his time as editor, he was able to harness his creativity and publish many short stories and poems in printed media. More recently, he has contributed to news publications for the Malayalam News Media.

Since immigrating to the US in 1985, Jacob has been an active and committed member of various cultural and religious organizations. He joined the World Malayalee Council in 1995 and has held several positions, including President, Chairman, and Secretary, at the American Region and Houston Province levels. Additionally, he served as the General Secretary of the Malayalee Association of Greater Houston in 2000. His dedication has persisted throughout the years, as he serves as the Vice president–admin in the American Region. He was able to serve as the Houston Bureau Coordinator for Reporter TV USA.

Finally, he is the current World Malayalee Council Chairman (America Region) and has been a member of St. Thomas Orthodox Cathedral Houston’s Golden Jubilee Souvenir Committee Chair. He was blessed with the opportunity to serve in multiple capacities. He hopes to continue to be a contributing member of the Indo–American community in the coming years.

Reji Philip – Philadelphia

Reji Phillip, a reporter for the Global Reporter channel, is a well-known journalist. He holds a master’s degree in journalism and manages the creative department in several visual and online media.

Jacob Abraham – NY

Jacob Abraham is the CEO of Hedge Events and the publisher of Hedge News. With a keen eye for detail and a strategic mindset, Jacob has successfully led Hedge Events to become a premier event management company known for its innovative and high-quality events. His leadership has also elevated Hedge News, a prominent publication that offers in-depth analysis and insights into the financial world. Jacob’s expertise and dedication have made him a respected figure in the industry, continually pushing the boundaries of excellence in event management and financial journalism.

Dr. Renee Mehra – Chicago

Dr. Renee Mehra has been working in the media since 1990. Renee is the host of the show ‘Renee Report’, which provides media coverage on politics, health, human interest stories, fashion, film, theater, and current affairs. She has been the president of Reenbow Media, an advertising, broadcasting, and public relations company since 2010. She acted as associate director of external affairs department NYC health, hospitals/Queens from 2014 to 2017. After earning a BA in broadcast journalism from the University of New York, and an MA in political management and public relations from George Washington University, she received her doctorate from Walden University.

Ashly Joseph – Canada

As the editor-in-chief of Jai Hind News, a popular Malayalam newspaper in North America, Ashly Joseph served as a member of the board of directors of the IAPC. He began his journalistic career in 2003 as a reporter for the ‘Malayalee Manas’, a Florida-based newspaper, and was the editor-in-chief of ‘Yatra’, a 2006 magazine aimed at new immigrants. From 2007 to 2009 he was the managing editor of ‘Aksharam’, a leading Malayalam magazine in the United States. Ashley’s numerous articles on social, political, and literary issues have already been published in print and online media. Ashly is an executive member of the Edmonton Catholic Association and is the founder of several associations and clubs. He came to the United States in 1999 and is known among the Malayalees as a great organizer. Ashley, who now works for the Canadian postal department, was the coordinator of the International Volleyball Tournament in Niagara. A graduate of Botany from Nirmala College, Muvattupuzha, Ashley was active in politics and society during his studies before he graduated with a degree in hotel management and moved to the United States.

Joseph John – Calgary, CAD

Joseph John is a Canadian Freelance Guild (CFG) and a Calgary-based freelance reporter who is president of the Alberta Chapter of the Indo-American Press Club. Joseph has also been the president of the Malayalee Cultural Association of Calgary, which has more than 4,000 members. Joseph John, founder, and organizer of ‘Kavya Sandhya’, which promotes literary and cultural activities for children in Kerala, is also a volunteer reporter for the Global Reporter section of the Reporter Malayalam channel. He is the founder and organizer of the ‘NAMMAL’ (North American Media Center for Malayalam Art and Literature) association with media support from news web portals in three Indian languages — ‘Nammal Online’ in Malayalam, ‘Namathu Tamil’ in Tamil, and ‘Namaste World’ in English. In addition, he serves as the national coordinator of ‘Nammalude Pallikoodam’, which conducts free Malayalam online classes with the help of volunteers from various provinces. He is the secretary of the National Association of Corrosion Engineers and for the Association of Materials Protection and Performance, Calgary Chapter of the U.S. & Canada Northern Area.

Korason Varghese – NY

Writer and journalist from New York. His column “Valkannadi” is published in media such as Manorama. He has published two collections of articles. He has done interviews through Reporter TV and Kalavedi TV. He is present in cultural and social spaces. He has worked as a Wise Men International Club public relations officer and as a UN representative. He has received the 2017 Emalayali Popular Writer Award, the 2022 Fokana Literary Award, the Kalavedi Literary Award, and the 2023 IAPC Social Media Influencer Award. Korason is also a cartoonist living in Long Island.

In the introduction to the collection of essays by Korason, Valkannadi, renowned writer Benyamin writes that the views of society can be accurately reflected through the unbiased Valkannadi. The writer, who has been living as a Malayali immigrant in America for a long time, has a passion for language and social commitment that seriously enhances the value of Valkannadi. – Benyamin.

Over the past five years, Reporter TV and Kalavedi TV have been a part of Korason’s backroom staff through several in-depth interviews. A.J. Philip, a veteran journalist who has been the editor of newspapers like The Indian Express and The Tribune, said, “I found Korason to be a very capable and cheerful interviewer. You can tell that there was proper homework behind it. The questions were quite probing but not intimidating. I wish television anchors in India were like Korason,” A.J. Philip wrote in his column.

He worked as a columnist, cartoonist, and editor in the newspapers Kairali and Jai Hind, published in New York. He was the editor of Fokana’s Haritham Smaranika, held in Albany, and served as the executive president and general secretary of the Indo-American Press Club. He managed a column in the leading online media Marunadan Malayali for more than five years.

Worked as a Senior Analyst for the Independent Budget Review for the Nassau County Government of New York. Experience in the formulation of basic political policy in the United States. Worked as a Finance Manager for the New York City Government for a quarter of a century.

Joji Kavanal – NY

Joji Kavanal is the treasurer of the Malankara Archdiocese of North America and one of the founding directors of the Indo-American Press Club. He also served as the director of Jaihind TV USA from 2010 to 2013. He was chief editor of Malankara Deepam annual publication of the Malankara Archdiocese

He practiced law in the Kerala High Court and is also a treasurer of the Kerala High Court Advocates Association. His extensive experience and dedication have significantly contributed to his leadership roles within the diaspora community, bridging cultural and professional ties between India and North America.

Anil Augustine – Atlanta

Anil Augustine is an Atlanta, GA resident, professionally a Public Relations (PR) management consultant in the International Trade, Media, and Human Resource domains. Currently, he serves as the Managing Director of an enterprise advisory firm www.AuguDEST.com, which assists global entrepreneurs, in reaching expertise in bilateral global trade, Media, PR & HR avenues. He is the joint promoter at the marketplace aggregator – Rural Agricultural Development Technology and Research. Anil has served on the Henry County, GA School System’s Advisory Council Board Since 2016 and the Eagle’s Landing Middle School as President of the PTO Board since 2019. As a Public Relations Officio, Anil is involved with Global

Indian Council, a diaspora advocacy institution, and World Malayalee Council, the global fraternity of Kerala diaspora. He serves on the Executive Board of the Federation of Malayalee Associations in Americas (FOMAA) immigration advocacy initiative – L.i.F.e, FOMAA Legal Immigration Federation, Anil served as the National Vice-president of IAPC and enthusiastically contributed to the International Media Convention in 2018 as the IAPC Atlanta Chapter Advisory Board member.

Dr.Eapen Daniel – Philadelphia

Dr. Eapen Daniel, a distinguished academic and community leader, resides in Pennsylvania, near the Philadelphia area. He graduated with a degree in Botany from Mar Thoma College in 1973 and later earned an M.Sc. from S.B. College, Changanacherry, securing a university rank. He began his career as a Botany professor at Mar Thoma College (Kerala University), where he taught until 1982.

After moving to the United States, Dr. Daniel pursued graduate studies at Texas Tech University and worked at the Texas Health Sciences Center until 1986. He then relocated to Pennsylvania, where he studied and worked at the University of Pennsylvania, earning his Doctorate. He continues to contribute to the university in the field of Genomics Integration.

Beyond academia, Dr. Daniel has been an influential figure in civic and religious circles in the Philadelphia Tri-State area for over 30 years. He has served as the President of PAMPA, a leading Malayalee association, and currently leads the Indian Overseas Congress (IOC) PA Chapter. His dedication to the Mar Thoma Church is notable, having served as Chief Editor of The Mar Thoma Messenger for 12 years and as a long-time youth activity coordinator and senior advisor for various church organizations.

Dr. Daniel’s contributions have been recognized with numerous achievement awards from civic and religious organizations, underscoring his lifelong commitment to community service and leadership

Indo-American Press Club (IAPC) is a fast-growing syndicate of print, visual, online, and electronic media journalists and other media-related professionals of Indian origin working in the United States, Canada, and Europe. IAPC is committed to enhancing the working conditions of our journalists, exchanging ideas, and offering educational and training opportunities to our members, aspiring young journalists, and media professionals around the globe; and also by honoring media people for their excellence, and for bringing positive changes through their dedicated service among the community. Today IAPC envisages its vision through collective efforts and advocacy activities through its 15 Chapters across the US and Canada, in the larger public sphere. Visit www.indoamericanpressclub.com to learn more.

ITServe Alliance’s New Leadership for 2025 Aims To Strengthen Its Presence And Impact Within The Industry

February 20, 2025February 24, 2025 Ajay GhoshCommunity, Technology 0

ITServe Alliance, the premier association of over 2,500 small and medium-sized IT companies across North America, has inaugurated its leadership team for 2025. Anju Vallabhaneni takes the helm as National President, bringing over 23 years of experience in IT management and seven years of dedicated service to ITServe. Under his leadership, the organization aims to strengthen its presence and impact within the industry.

Leadership at the Forefront

“I am honored to lead ITServe Alliance, the largest association representing IT Solutions, Product Development, and Service organizations in the United States. Together, we will continue to advocate for our members, drive innovation, and enhance our collective strength,” said Mr. Vallabhaneni upon assuming office in January 2025.

Supporting Vallabhaneni in governance, Raghu Chittimalla assumes the role of Governing Board Chair, emphasizing a collaborative leadership culture. “Our focus will be on unity, ensuring all board members prioritize ITServe’s mission above individual interests to achieve collective success,” he stated.

Siva Moopanar, President-Elect, is poised to lead ITServe in 2026. “I am committed to ensuring ITServe attracts top talent, fosters innovation, and drives economic growth,” he affirmed. A seasoned entrepreneur, Moopanar is the President & CEO of Edify Technologies, with three decades of expertise in IT leadership and commercial real estate investment.

Expanding Reach and Influence

ITServe operates through four core boards: ITServe Alliance, Connected PAC, ITServe Services Board(ITSS), and ITServe CSR Board. With 23 Chapters across the U.S., the organization continues its mission to support IT enterprises, advocate for policy reforms, and invest in innovation.

2025 Chapter Presidents: Leaders across ITServe’s 23 Chapters will play a crucial role in expanding the organization’s impact.

Commitment to Growth and Innovation

Reflecting on ITServe’s journey, Immediate Past President Jagadeesh Mosali highlighted the organization’s growth from a regional network in 2010 to a national force in IT services. The addition of new chapters in Tennessee and New York marks continued expansion.

“ITServe’s success is built on the collective strength of its members,” said Vallabhaneni. “Together, we will continue to champion the interests of small and medium-sized IT enterprises, foster innovation, and expand our national presence by adding two more chapters during the year (Boston, MA & Sacramento, CA). I invite all ITServe members to join me in this mission.” For more information, please visit www.itserve.org.

India Braces for Impact as U.S. Threatens Reciprocal Tariffs

February 20, 2025February 24, 2025 Staff ReporterIndia 0

U.S. President Donald Trump’s warning of imposing reciprocal tariffs starting in early April has raised concerns across India’s export sectors, spanning from automobiles to agriculture. Analysts at Citi Research project that these tariffs could result in annual losses of approximately $7 billion for India.

Government officials are currently awaiting details on how the tariffs will be calculated before fully assessing their economic impact. However, they are preparing strategies to counter them and working on a trade proposal aimed at reducing tariffs while enhancing bilateral trade with the United States.

Sectors at Risk

According to Citi analysts, India’s most vulnerable industries include chemicals, metal products, and jewellery, followed by automobiles, pharmaceuticals, and food products.

India’s merchandise exports to the U.S. in 2024 were estimated at nearly $74 billion. Among these, pearls, gems, and jewellery accounted for $8.5 billion, pharmaceuticals contributed $8 billion, and petrochemicals were valued at around $4 billion.

Overall, India imposed a weighted average tariff of approximately 11% in 2023, which was about 8.2 percentage points higher than the tariffs the U.S. applied to Indian exports, according to Citi estimates.

U.S. Exports to India

In 2024, U.S. manufacturing exports to India were worth nearly $42 billion and faced significantly higher tariffs. These ranged from 7% on wood products and machinery to 15%-20% on footwear and transport equipment. Food items faced the steepest tariff, reaching nearly 68%.

A White House fact sheet released last week highlighted the tariff discrepancies, stating that the U.S. applied an average Most Favored Nation (MFN) tariff of 5% on agricultural goods, whereas India’s average MFN tariff on such products stood at 39%.

Additionally, the U.S. criticized India for imposing a 100% tariff on American motorcycles, while the U.S. levied only a 2.4% tariff on Indian motorcycles.

Agriculture Sector

India’s agriculture and food exports, which have the highest tariff differentials despite relatively low trade volumes, could face significant setbacks if the U.S. chooses to extend reciprocal tariffs to a wider range of farm products.

Textile, Leather, and Wood Products

The textile, leather, and wood product industries, which are labor-intensive, face relatively lower risks due to smaller tariff gaps and their limited share in U.S.-India trade.

Moreover, many American companies manufacture these products in South Asia, benefiting from India’s free trade agreements. This allows them to sell their products in the Indian market at reduced tariffs.

Worst-Case Scenario

Economists at Standard Chartered Bank estimate that in a worst-case scenario—where the U.S. imposes a uniform 10% tariff hike on all Indian imports—India’s economy could experience a decline of 50 to 60 basis points. This projection assumes an 11%-12% drop in Indian exports to the U.S.

India’s Response

To ease trade tensions, India has already reduced tariffs on several goods. For instance, it lowered tariffs on high-end motorcycles from 50% to 30% and slashed duties on bourbon whiskey from 150% to 100%. Furthermore, India has pledged to reassess other tariffs, increase energy imports, and purchase more defense equipment in an effort to address U.S. trade concerns.

Drishyam 3 Confirmed: Mohanlal and Jeethu Joseph Set to Continue the Thriller Saga

February 20, 2025February 24, 2025 Staff ReporterFilm 0

After a long wait, director Jeethu Joseph is returning with the next chapter in the Drishyam series.

On Thursday, actor Mohanlal delighted his fans by announcing on social media that Drishyam 3 is in development. The first installment of the Malayalam thriller, Drishyam, was released in 2013. After a break, its sequel, Drishyam 2, followed in 2021.

To make the announcement, Mohanlal shared a picture of himself with director Jeethu Joseph and producer Antony Perumbavoor. All three were dressed in matching black shirts and posed happily for the camera. Alongside the image, he wrote, “The past never stays silent. Drishyam 3 confirmed.”

Fans Celebrate Drishyam 3 Announcement

As soon as Mohanlal’s post surfaced online, fans expressed their excitement across social media platforms. One user referred to the trio as “The OG,” while another commented, “He’s coming again.” Another enthusiastic fan wrote on X, “The suspense continues! Can’t wait to see how the Drishyam saga unfolds.”

Drishyam’s Widespread Popularity

Drishyam has been a massive success across India, inspiring remakes in multiple languages. The original 2013 Malayalam film starred Mohanlal, Meena, Ansiba Hassan, and Esther Anil in key roles.

Following its success, the film was remade in Telugu as Drushyam and in Kannada as Drishya in 2014. In 2015, it was adapted into Tamil as Papanasam and into Hindi under the same title, Drishyam. The popularity of the film extended beyond India, leading to Sinhalese and Chinese versions titled Withanage and The Witness, respectively.

The sequel, Drishyam 2, also garnered significant acclaim. It was subsequently remade in Hindi, Telugu, and Kannada, with leading actors like Ajay Devgn, Venkatesh, Kamal Haasan, and Ravichandran stepping into Mohanlal’s iconic role. An English adaptation of the film is also in the works.

Director Jeethu Joseph Speaks About Drishyam 3

Discussing the upcoming third installment, Jeethu Joseph shared insights during an interview with RedFM in Malayalam. He explained, “When I made Drishyam in 2013, I did not have a plan for a sequel. It took me five years to zero in on an idea. I had problems in one particular area in the film. Similarly, I am stuck in cracking a certain area in Drishyam 3. I know how to end the movie, but I’m clueless about other areas. The climax of Drishyam 3 is already in my head. I narrated it to Mohanlal Sir, and he liked it as well. But, I want to crack that one area.”

With Jeethu Joseph working through the storyline and Mohanlal returning to lead the film, expectations for Drishyam 3 are already running high. Fans eagerly await to see how the next chapter unfolds in this gripping thriller series.

Russia and U.S. Agree to Work Toward Ending Ukraine War and Strengthening Ties

February 19, 2025February 23, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

Russia and the United States reached an agreement on Tuesday to begin efforts toward ending the war in Ukraine and enhancing their diplomatic and economic relations, according to statements from both nations’ top diplomats. This marks a dramatic shift in U.S. foreign policy under President Donald Trump.

In an interview with The Associated Press following the discussions, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio outlined three primary objectives that both parties broadly agreed upon. These include restoring staffing levels at their respective embassies in Washington and Moscow, forming a high-level team to assist in Ukraine peace negotiations, and exploring opportunities for closer diplomatic and economic ties.

However, Rubio emphasized that the meeting, which included his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov and senior officials from both sides, was merely the beginning of a dialogue, with substantial work still ahead.

Lavrov echoed this sentiment, telling reporters that “the conversation was very useful.” He further stated, “We not only listened, but also heard each other.”

Among those present at the meeting were Trump’s national security adviser, Michael Waltz, and special Mideast envoy Steven Witkoff, along with Lavrov and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov.

Despite the significant discussions, no Ukrainian representatives were involved. The talks took place as Ukraine continues to struggle in the face of superior Russian military strength in a prolonged conflict that began nearly three years ago.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy made it clear that his country would not recognize any conclusions reached in the talks, given that Kyiv had no participation. In response, he postponed his planned visit to Saudi Arabia, originally scheduled for Wednesday.

European allies also voiced concerns about potentially being sidelined in the discussions.

Trump, however, showed little tolerance for Ukraine’s complaints about being excluded. He criticized Ukraine’s leaders for failing to prevent the war, implying that they should have made compromises with Russia before the full-scale invasion in 2022.

“Today I heard, ‘Oh, well, we weren’t invited.’ Well, you been there for three years. You should have ended it three years ago,” Trump remarked at a news conference at his Florida residence. “You should have never started it. You could have made a deal.”

Efforts to Improve U.S.-Russia Relations

Relations between the U.S. and Russia have deteriorated significantly over the years, reaching their lowest point in decades. The decline began with Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and worsened with Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The U.S., in coordination with European nations, imposed extensive sanctions on Russia to weaken its economy. Additionally, diplomatic tensions escalated as both nations expelled large numbers of each other’s diplomats and implemented restrictions on their embassies.

Rubio suggested on Tuesday that resolving the war in Ukraine could serve as a gateway to unlocking “incredible opportunities” for U.S.-Russia cooperation on mutual interests. He expressed optimism that such collaboration could be beneficial for global stability and lead to improved bilateral relations in the long term.

His remarks signified a striking shift in U.S. policy toward Russia. Under Trump’s predecessor, Joe Biden, Washington spearheaded global efforts to isolate Moscow diplomatically and economically.

Tuesday’s discussions were also intended to lay the groundwork for a potential summit between Trump and Putin. However, according to Ushakov and Waltz, no date has been set for such a meeting. Ushakov indicated that a summit was “unlikely” to occur next week, while Waltz suggested that an arrangement could be made in the coming weeks.

Speaking to reporters post-meeting, Lavrov reiterated the same three objectives outlined by Rubio. He further stated that Washington and Moscow agreed to assign representatives for “regular consultations” on Ukraine.

“I have reason to believe that the American side has started to better understand our position,” Lavrov remarked.

This meeting marked the most extensive diplomatic engagement between the two nations since Russia launched its invasion on February 24, 2022. Previously, Lavrov and then-U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken had only engaged in brief discussions on the sidelines of a G-20 meeting in India nearly two years ago, during a period of heightened tensions.

Concerns Over Being Sidelined

The recent U.S. diplomatic push regarding the Ukraine war has left Kyiv and key Western allies scrambling to ensure they are involved in any decisions. Many fear that Washington and Moscow might pursue an agreement that does not align with their interests.

Ukraine’s exclusion from Tuesday’s discussions frustrated many in the country. In response, France called an emergency meeting of European Union member states and the United Kingdom on Monday to deliberate over the war. During Biden’s presidency, U.S. policy was firm in ensuring Ukraine’s participation in such negotiations.

U.S. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce clarified that the talks were designed to gauge Russia’s seriousness about achieving peace and to assess whether formal negotiations could commence.

Rubio assured that there would be “engagement and consultation with Ukraine, with our partners in Europe and others. But ultimately, the Russian side will be indispensable to this effort.”

He further acknowledged that ending the war would require concessions from all parties and emphasized that the U.S. “is not going to predetermine” what those concessions might be.

Meanwhile, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested last week that NATO membership for Ukraine was unrealistic. He also hinted that Kyiv may need to abandon its goal of reclaiming all territories lost to Russia—two critical demands from Putin’s side.

French President Emmanuel Macron disclosed that he had phone conversations with both Trump and Zelenskyy after Monday’s European meeting.

“We seek a strong and lasting peace in Ukraine,” Macron wrote on the social media platform X. “To achieve this, Russia must end its aggression, and this must be accompanied by strong and credible security guarantees for the Ukrainians.” He pledged to “work on this together with all Europeans, Americans, and Ukrainians.”

Saudi Arabia’s Role in the Talks

The meeting was held at the Diriyah Palace in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, highlighting the kingdom’s aspirations to be a major diplomatic force. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has been actively working to bolster his international standing, particularly after his reputation was damaged by the 2018 killing of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Saudi state media reported that the discussions were held under the prince’s directive. Like the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia has maintained strong relations with Russia throughout the Ukraine war, both through its participation in the OPEC+ oil cartel and diplomatic engagements.

Saudi Arabia has also played a role in prisoner exchanges and hosted Zelenskyy during an Arab League summit in 2023.

However, Zelenskyy postponed his visit to Saudi Arabia this week, possibly to avoid any perception that his trip was linked to the U.S.-Russia talks, given Ukraine’s exclusion. His visit has been rescheduled for March 10.

Ongoing Conflict in Ukraine

Despite diplomatic efforts, Russia has continued its military offensive against Ukraine. According to Ukraine’s military, Russian forces launched a large-scale drone attack overnight.

The Ukrainian air force reported that Russian troops deployed 176 drones, most of which were intercepted or disabled through electronic jamming.

One Russian drone managed to hit a residential building in Dolynska, located in Ukraine’s Kirovohrad region. As a result, a mother and her two children were injured, prompting the evacuation of 38 apartments, as confirmed by the regional administration.

Trump’s Approval Rating Dips as Economic Concerns Grow Amid Tariff Threats

February 19, 2025February 23, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

U.S. President Donald Trump’s approval rating has seen a slight decline in recent days as concerns about the U.S. economy rise. According to a Reuters/Ipsos poll, more Americans are worried about the country’s economic direction, especially as the president continues to threaten multiple nations with tariffs.

The six-day poll, which concluded on Tuesday, found that 44% of respondents approved of Trump’s performance as president. This represents a slight drop from the 45% approval rating recorded in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted from January 24-26. His approval was slightly higher at 47% in a separate poll conducted on January 20-21, just as he returned to the White House.

Meanwhile, disapproval of Trump’s presidency has increased more significantly. The latest poll found that 51% of Americans disapproved of his job performance, a notable jump from 41% in the immediate aftermath of his return to office.

Despite the overall decline in approval, Trump continues to receive considerable support for his immigration policies. The poll found that 47% of respondents approved of his stance on immigration, which includes promises to intensify deportations of undocumented migrants. This level of support has remained relatively unchanged since January.

However, economic concerns among the public appear to be growing. The percentage of Americans who believe the economy is headed in the wrong direction increased to 53% in the latest poll, up from 43% in the January 24-26 survey. Additionally, public confidence in Trump’s handling of the economy has dropped. His approval rating for economic management fell from 43% in the previous poll to 39% in the most recent one.

Economic performance has been a cornerstone of Trump’s political appeal, with many voters believing that his policies would benefit the economy. His current approval rating on economic matters is still higher than the final rating of his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, who left office with just 34% approval on economic issues. However, Trump’s standing on this front has weakened compared to earlier in his presidency. In February 2017, during the first full month of his first term, Reuters/Ipsos polling showed him with a 53% approval rating on the economy.

Inflation remains a particularly troubling issue for Trump. In the latest survey, only 32% of respondents approved of his handling of inflation, signaling potential early disappointment in his economic policies. This follows several years of rising prices, which contributed to Biden’s struggles in the last presidential election. Trump won that election by securing a victory in the Electoral College while also narrowly winning the popular vote against Biden’s vice president, Kamala Harris.

Recent data from the U.S. Labor Department highlights ongoing economic challenges, as consumer prices in January rose at their fastest rate in nearly a year and a half. Americans are facing higher costs for various goods and services, and additional economic reports suggest that U.S. households anticipate inflation to increase further. These concerns have been exacerbated by Trump’s February 1 announcement of steep tariffs on imports from China, Mexico, and Canada.

Although tariffs on Mexico and Canada have been postponed until March, Trump has set March 12 as the start date for other duties on imported steel and aluminum. He has also instructed his administration to design a system of global reciprocal tariffs.

The poll reveals that the majority of Americans are not in favor of new tariffs on imported goods. Fifty-four percent of respondents opposed such measures, while 41% expressed support. However, the public appears to be more divided on tariffs specifically targeting Chinese imports. In this case, 49% of respondents were in favor, while 47% were opposed.

Conducted online, the Reuters/Ipsos poll surveyed 4,145 U.S. adults across the country. The survey has a margin of error of approximately two percentage points in either direction

How the Catholic Church Chooses a New Pope

February 19, 2025February 20, 2025 Staff ReporterReligion 0

As Pope Francis recovers from bronchitis in the hospital, speculation has grown about what would happen if he were to resign due to health concerns, following the precedent set by his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI.

The process by which the Catholic Church selects a new Pope has remained largely unchanged for the past 800 years. This system, known as the ‘Papal Conclave,’ will be employed once again when the time comes to choose Francis’ successor.

The selection process is democratic, relying on multiple rounds of voting until a clear consensus is reached. Under the current regulations, only Cardinals who are under 80 years old are permitted to vote.

While, in theory, any male Catholic is eligible to become Pope, in practice, the role has traditionally been filled by members of the College of Cardinals for centuries. There is no age restriction for becoming Pope, but history shows that most Pontiffs have been selected at an older age. Francis assumed the role at 76 and is now 88. Before him, Benedict XVI became Pope at 78 and unexpectedly retired at 85 after serving for eight years.

The process of selecting a new Pope begins with a special morning mass, after which the 120 voting-age Cardinals assemble in the Sistine Chapel. This chapel, renowned for its breathtaking decorations, has hosted every Papal Conclave since 1858.

Later in the day, the phrase “extra omnes” (meaning “everybody out”) is declared, signaling that only the Cardinals may remain inside. Having sworn an oath of secrecy, they are locked in until a new Pope is chosen.

The first round of voting does not necessarily yield an immediate result. The process involves speeches, prayer, reflection, and, inevitably, strategic negotiations as Cardinals narrow down the candidates through successive rounds.

Inside the Sistine Chapel, the Cardinals are seated on both sides. Nine Cardinals are randomly selected to oversee and manage the voting process. Among them, three act as Scrutineers, responsible for supervising the vote, three collect the ballots, and the remaining three verify them.

To be elected, a candidate must receive a two-thirds majority. If a strong candidate emerges early, the process can conclude swiftly. However, from the 34th ballot onward, voting is restricted to the two frontrunners who garnered the most support in the preceding round. Historically, some conclaves have been remarkably prolonged. One of the longest in history, occurring in the late 13th century, lasted nearly three years due to severe political discord. During this time, three voting Cardinals passed away.

The voting process itself is conducted in secrecy. In 1621, Pope Gregory XV implemented the secret ballot system to minimize overt political maneuvering. Nevertheless, the Conclave remains a battleground of competing factions, each striving for their preferred candidate. During each round, Cardinals write down their chosen candidate’s name, often altering their handwriting to keep their vote anonymous.

Once voting is complete, the ballots are burned in a small fire inside the Sistine Chapel. The color of the smoke signals the outcome to the crowds gathered outside. If black smoke rises, it indicates that no Pope has been elected, and voting will continue.

When a candidate secures the required two-thirds majority, the Cardinal Dean summons him to the front of the chapel and asks if he accepts the position. Upon agreeing, the newly elected Pope is asked to select his Papal name.

Despite being regarded as the successor of St. Peter, no Pope has ever chosen the name Peter. This is partly due to the desire to avoid direct comparisons with the founder of the Roman Catholic Church and partly because of an old prophecy suggesting that a Pope named Peter would precede the end of the world.

With the election finalized, the ballots are burned again, this time with a special additive that produces white smoke, signaling to the world that a new Pope has been chosen.

In anticipation of the new leader, Vatican tailors prepare three sets of Papal robes in small, medium, and large sizes. After the election, the new Pope enters the Room of Tears, adjacent to the Sistine Chapel, where he dons his white robes and red slippers.

Finally, he is introduced to the public from the main balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica with the historic declaration: “Annuntio vobis gaudium magnum: Habemus Papam!” meaning, “I announce to you with great joy, we have a Pope.”

Indian Migration to the U.S.: Trends, Challenges, and Policy Shifts

February 18, 2025February 20, 2025 Staff ReporterCommunity 0

Donald Trump has prioritized the large-scale deportation of undocumented foreign nationals as a key policy, with reports indicating that U.S. authorities have identified approximately 18,000 Indian nationals suspected of entering the country illegally.

During his recent visit to Washington, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi acknowledged the issue, stating that India would repatriate its citizens residing unlawfully in the U.S. while also intensifying efforts to dismantle the “human trafficking ecosystem.”

“These are children of very ordinary families, and they are lured by big dreams and promises,” Modi remarked.

Now, a new study by Abby Budiman and Devesh Kapur from Johns Hopkins University offers a detailed examination of the numbers, demographics, entry methods, locations, and trends of undocumented Indian nationals in the U.S. over time.

The Size of the Undocumented Indian Population

Unauthorized immigrants constitute approximately 3% of the U.S. population and 22% of all foreign-born residents. However, estimates regarding the number of undocumented Indians vary significantly due to differing methodologies.

According to Pew Research Center and the Center for Migration Studies of New York (CMS), there were about 700,000 undocumented Indians in 2022, making them the third-largest group after Mexico and El Salvador. Conversely, the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) estimated 375,000, placing India fifth among countries of origin.

Official data from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reported a much lower figure of 220,000 unauthorized Indian immigrants in 2022. The stark differences between these estimates underscore the uncertainty surrounding the true number of undocumented Indian nationals.

Decline from Peak Levels

While Indian migrants form only a small fraction of the overall unauthorized population in the U.S., their numbers have fluctuated over time. If Pew and CMS estimates are correct, nearly one in four Indian immigrants in the U.S. lacks legal status—an unlikely scenario, given broader migration trends.

The DHS estimated a sharp decline in undocumented Indians, dropping 60% from a peak of 560,000 in 2016 to 220,000 in 2022. However, the reasons for this decline remain unclear. Kapur suggests that possible explanations include some individuals obtaining legal status or voluntarily returning to India, particularly during COVID-19-related disruptions.

Despite an increase in border crossings by Indians in 2023, U.S. government estimates showed no significant rise in the overall undocumented Indian population between 2020 and 2022.

Encounters, a term used to describe instances where non-citizens are apprehended by U.S. authorities at borders with Mexico or Canada, have risen. However, visa overstays among Indians have remained steady at around 1.5% since 2016.

Additionally, the number of Indian beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which provides protections for migrants who arrived as children, has declined from 2,600 in 2017 to 1,600 in 2024.

Overall, the share of undocumented Indians among all unauthorized immigrants rose from 0.8% in 1990 to 3.9% in 2015, before declining to 2% in 2022.

Changing Migration Routes and Increased Border Crossings

The U.S. has two major land borders: the southern border, which spans Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas, and the northern border, covering 11 states adjacent to Canada.

Before 2010, the number of Indians apprehended at these borders was minimal, never exceeding 1,000 encounters annually. However, since 2010, nearly all recorded encounters involving Indian nationals occurred at the U.S.-Mexico border.

A notable shift occurred in 2024, with 36% of Indian border crossings happening at the U.S.-Canada border—up from just 4% the previous year. Canada has become an increasingly viable entry point for Indian nationals due to shorter visa processing times compared to the U.S.

The overall surge in migration attempts since 2021 reached a peak in 2023, coinciding with a broader trend of increased border crossings following Joe Biden’s election.

“This is not specific to Indians. It is part of a larger surge of migrants trying to come into the U.S. after Biden was elected. It is as if there was a high tide of migrants and Indians were a part of it,” Kapur explained.

Where Are Undocumented Indians Residing?

The study found that the states with the largest Indian immigrant populations—California (112,000), Texas (61,000), New Jersey (55,000), New York (43,000), and Illinois (31,000)—also host the highest numbers of unauthorized Indian immigrants.

Indians constitute a significant share of the total undocumented population in several states, including Ohio (16%), Michigan (14%), New Jersey (12%), and Pennsylvania (11%). Additionally, states such as Tennessee, Indiana, Georgia, Wisconsin, and California have over 20% of their Indian immigrant population lacking legal status.

“We expect this because it’s easier to blend in and find work in an ethnic business—like a Gujarati working for a Gujarati-American or a Punjabi/Sikh in a similar setup,” Kapur noted.

Asylum Seekers from India

The U.S. immigration system permits individuals detained at the border who fear persecution in their home countries to undergo “credible fear screenings.” Those who pass these screenings can apply for asylum in court, leading to an increase in asylum applications alongside rising border apprehensions.

While administrative data does not provide a detailed demographic breakdown of Indian asylum seekers, court records based on spoken languages offer some insight.

Punjabi speakers from India have accounted for 66% of asylum claims from 2001 to 2022, followed by Hindi (14%), English (8%), and Gujarati (7%) speakers. This suggests that Punjab and the neighboring state of Haryana are key sources of Indian migrants seeking asylum.

Approval rates also vary: Punjabi speakers had the highest asylum acceptance rate at 63%, followed by Hindi speakers at 58%, while only 25% of Gujarati-speaking applicants were successful.

Rise in Asylum Requests and System Exploitation

Data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shows that asylum applications from Indians in the U.S. surged tenfold, increasing from 5,000 in 2021 to over 51,000 in 2023.

Although the most dramatic rise occurred in the U.S., similar trends were observed in Canada, the UK, and Australia. Kapur suggests that many Indian asylum claims are not driven by genuine fears of persecution but are instead a strategic attempt to exploit lengthy asylum processing times.

“This is largely a way to game the asylum system rather than an objective fear of persecution, as processing takes years,” Kapur said.

Despite this surge in asylum claims, there is no clear indication of significant political repression in Punjab, which has been governed by the Congress Party (2017-2022) and the Aam Aadmi Party (2022-present).

With Trump aiming for a second term, asylum requests are expected to decrease significantly. His administration has already taken steps to shut down a key migrant app, removing it from app stores and canceling nearly 300,000 pending appointments, including asylum hearings.

Economic Drivers of Migration

Data suggests that most Indian asylum seekers are from wealthier states, such as Punjab and Gujarat, where migration is financially viable. Meanwhile, marginalized groups, Indian Muslims, and those from conflict zones like Kashmir rarely seek asylum.

Migrating to the U.S. through unauthorized routes, including Latin America or as fraudulent students in Canada, can cost 30 to 100 times India’s per capita income. As a result, only those with significant assets can afford these journeys.

Given that Punjab and Gujarat have long histories of emigration, economic aspirations rather than political persecution appear to be the primary motivators for migration. The demand for a better life is driven not by absolute poverty but by “relative deprivation,” as families seek to emulate the success of others abroad.

Deportations of Indian Nationals

Between 2009 and 2024, approximately 16,000 Indians were deported, according to India’s Ministry of External Affairs.

Annual deportations averaged 750 during Barack Obama’s presidency, rose to 1,550 under Trump’s first term, and declined to 900 under Biden. The highest number of deportations occurred in 2020, when nearly 2,300 Indians were removed.

More recently, deportations of Indian nationals have spiked again between 2023 and 2024.

Sir John Major Warns of Growing Threats to Democracy Amid U.S. Isolationism

February 17, 2025February 19, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

Sir John Major has cautioned that democracy is at risk as the United States retreats from its global leadership role.

The former British prime minister expressed concern that President Donald Trump’s policy of American “isolation” is leaving a power vacuum, potentially emboldening nations such as Russia and China.

Sir John, who led the UK from 1990 to 1997, remarked that the progress achieved since the Soviet Union’s collapse was now being undone. He asserted that Russia was likely to invade other countries in the near future. “There is no doubt in my mind that democracy has been in modest decline over the last 18 years,” he said, emphasizing that “ugly nationalism” was emerging, contributing to an increasingly unstable global situation.

His warning coincides with preparations by European leaders for an emergency summit on the war in Ukraine. Meanwhile, U.S. and Russian officials are set to engage in peace talks, raising concerns that European nations, including Ukraine, are being excluded from negotiations.

Sir John also dismissed U.S. Vice President JD Vance’s recent criticism of Europe’s record on free speech. He argued that such remarks should have been directed at Moscow or Beijing instead. Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s The World This Weekend, he stated, “It’s extremely odd to lecture Europe on the subject of free speech and democracy at the same time as they’re cuddling [Russian President Vladimir] Putin.”

He further condemned Russia’s suppression of dissent, saying, “In Mr. Putin’s Russia, people who disagree with him disappear, or die, or flee the country, or—on a statistically unlikely level—fall out of high windows somewhere in Moscow.”

Sir John highlighted the shifting geopolitical landscape, stating, “The world is changing and may not be reshaping in a way that is congenial to the West.” He pointed to Russia’s aggressive actions in Ukraine as evidence that past diplomatic gains were being undone. “Many of the gains we made over recent years, when the Soviet Union collapsed, are now being reversed, and you see a very aggressive Russia again in Ukraine,” he said. He warned that if Russia succeeded in its objectives in Ukraine, “no doubt they’d be elsewhere before too long.”

Discussing the broader decline of democracy, Sir John reiterated, “There is an ugly nationalism growing, mostly from the intolerant right… So it is a very unsettled time.”

Addressing domestic political matters, the former Conservative leader acknowledged the economic difficulties faced by the UK government, particularly Chancellor Rachel Reeves. However, he suggested that the current global climate might necessitate increased defense spending. “It’s very, very easy to say from outside government, ‘I’d just do this and I’d spend all this money,'” he said. “I would prefer to say I would realise in my plans that we have to make a very material increase in the level of defence expenditure and do it as a priority as soon as it is credible to do so.”

Speaking separately on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg program, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds emphasized the need for the UK and Europe to respond to U.S. calls for greater contributions toward their “collective defense” in the face of “greater threats.”

Reynolds confirmed that the government would outline a roadmap to increase defense spending from 2.3% to 2.5% of the nation’s economic output. However, he did not specify a timeline for achieving this target.

Despite growing tensions between the U.S. and its allies regarding the Ukraine conflict, Reynolds maintained that there was “still a great deal of common ground” between the nations.

Sir John has voiced his concerns on multiple occasions in recent years, particularly regarding Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which began in 2022. In the early stages of the war, he joined former Prime Minister Gordon Brown and others in signing a petition demanding that Vladimir Putin face a Nuremberg-style trial for war crimes over his actions in Ukraine.

Pope Drama Conclave and Immigration Epic The Brutalist Win Big at BAFTA Film Awards

February 17, 2025February 19, 2025 Staff ReporterEntertainment 0

At the BAFTA Film Awards on Sunday, Conclave, a drama centered on the election of a new Pope, and The Brutalist, an immigration-themed epic, emerged as the biggest winners.

Directed by German filmmaker Edward Berger, Conclave won four awards, including Best Film and Best British Film. This marked the first time a film had won both categories in the same year since 1917, a war drama that triumphed in 2019. Additionally, the movie secured wins for Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Editing.

Meanwhile, American director Brady Corbet’s The Brutalist also claimed four awards. Corbet won Best Director, while Adrien Brody earned Best Actor for portraying Hungarian architect and Holocaust survivor László Tóth. The film also took home awards for Best Original Score and Best Cinematography.

Among other notable winners were Mikey Madison, who won Best Actress for Anora, Kieran Culkin, awarded Best Supporting Actor for A Real Pain, and Zoe Saldaña, who received Best Supporting Actress for Emilia Pérez.

In the weeks leading up to the Oscars, Anora, a film about a New York stripper’s whirlwind romance with the son of a Russian oligarch, had gained significant momentum as a Best Picture contender. However, it ended the night with wins for Best Actress and Best Casting.

Madison’s victory came as a surprise despite her critically acclaimed performance in Sean Baker’s film. Accepting the award, she expressed her shock: “Wow, I really wasn’t expecting this. I probably should have listened to my publicist and written a speech or something!”

The 25-year-old actress, known for roles in Better Things, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, and Scream, has now stepped into the spotlight with her leading role in Anora. In her speech, she took a moment to acknowledge sex workers: “I want to take a moment to recognize the sex worker community. I see you, you deserve respect and human decency. I will always be an ally and a friend.”

Demi Moore, who had been winning Best Actress awards at the Golden Globes and Critics Choice Awards for her role in The Substance, was widely expected to take the BAFTA as well. While her loss does not diminish her chances at the Oscars, Madison’s win adds intrigue to the competition.

The Substance, a horror film where Moore plays a TV aerobics presenter who takes a black-market drug to transform into a younger version of herself, won Best Makeup and Hair. Packed with graphic effects, the movie is also a frontrunner in the same category at the Oscars.

Films That Won the Most Awards

Conclave– 4
The Brutalist– 4
Wicked– 2
Emilia Pérez– 2
Anora– 2
Dune Part 2– 2
A Real Pain– 2
Wallace and Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl– 2

Leading the nominations with 12, Conclave follows a group of cardinals gathered in Rome to elect a new Pope, featuring Ralph Fiennes. Berger expressed deep gratitude for winning Best Film and described receiving the Best British Film award as “a huge, huge honor.” He humorously acknowledged his non-British background, stating, “Best British and I’m not even from here, so I feel so welcome in your midst.”

BAFTA rules require films in the British category to have significant creative contributions from British individuals. During his speech, Berger reflected on the current political climate, stating, “We live in a time of a crisis of democracy,” and concluded with a Leonard Cohen quote: “There’s a crack in everything, that’s how the light gets in.”

Brody, accepting his Best Actor award for The Brutalist, described the film as “really about the pursuit of leaving something meaningful,” while Corbet expressed being “humbled and very grateful.”

The ceremony, hosted by David Tennant at London’s Royal Festival Hall, opened with the actor wearing a kilt and leading a performance of I’m Gonna Be (500 Miles) by The Proclaimers, joined by James McAvoy and Colman Domingo.

This year’s awards season has been marked by unpredictability, with no single film dominating the event. Instead, various films shared the honors.

For the third consecutive year, no British actors won in any of the four major acting categories at Britain’s most prestigious film event.

Notable Films That Missed Out

Despite multiple nominations, some highly anticipated films left empty-handed, including:

A Complete Unknown(Bob Dylan biopic starring Timothée Chalamet)
Nosferatu
Blitz
Gladiator II
The Apprentice

Emilia Pérez and Its Controversy

The French-produced Emilia Pérez tells the story of a Mexican drug lord who undergoes gender transition to leave behind a life of crime. In recent weeks, the film faced controversy over offensive social media posts made by its lead actress, Karla Sofía Gascón.

Despite concerns that the backlash might impact its award prospects, the film won Best International Film and Best Supporting Actress for Zoe Saldaña, who is now seen as a strong contender at the Oscars.

Director Jacques Audiard acknowledged the cast while accepting the international film award, as did Saldaña in her speech.

Kieran Culkin’s victory for A Real Pain was largely anticipated. His co-star, Jesse Eisenberg, who also wrote and directed the film, accepted the award on his behalf.

Eisenberg’s film, centered on two cousins exploring their Jewish grandmother’s roots in Poland, also won Best Original Screenplay.

Actor and TV presenter Warwick Davis was honored with the BAFTA Fellowship, the highest recognition given by the British Academy. He dedicated the award to his late wife, saying, “My wonderful wife Sammy, who died almost a year ago,” and also expressed gratitude to his mother, calling her his “first agent.”

In Memoriam Segment

The annual tribute segment honored film industry members who passed away over the past year, including Dame Maggie Smith, James Earl Jones, David Lynch, Dame Joan Plowright, and Donald Sutherland.

Other Notable Wins

Denis Villeneuve’s Dune Part 2 won awards for Special Effects and Sound.

The blockbuster musical Wicked earned Best Production Design for British artists Nathan Crowley and Lee Sandales. It marked Crowley’s first BAFTA win after six nominations, while Sandales had won twice before. The film also took home Best Costume Design.

Aardman’s latest Wallace and Gromit installment, Vengeance Most Fowl, was named Best Animation. Surprisingly, this marked the studio’s first-ever BAFTA in the category. Additionally, it won the inaugural Best Children and Family Film award.

Irish rap group Kneecap won Outstanding Debut by a British Writer, Director, or Producer. Their Irish-language film, a semi-fictionalized depiction of the band’s formation, was celebrated as more than just a film. Director Rich Peppiatt remarked, “Kneecap is more than a film, it’s a movement,” adding that all languages and cultures should be respected.

The Best Documentary award went to Super/Man: The Christopher Reeve Story, chronicling the life of the actor best known for playing Superman. The film explores Reeve’s journey following a horse-riding accident that left him paralyzed a decade before his passing in 2004. His children took the stage to honor their late father.

Defense Stocks Plunge as Trump Suggests Massive Military Budget Cuts

February 17, 2025February 19, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

Defense stocks saw a sharp decline Thursday afternoon following remarks from President Donald Trump, who suggested that the United States could significantly reduce its defense spending.

Speaking at the White House, Trump proposed that U.S. military expenditures might be slashed by half in the future. His comments arose while discussing the possibility of holding a defense spending conference with China and Russia.

“At some point, when things settle down, I’m going to meet with China and I’m going to meet with Russia, in particular those two, and I’m going to say there’s no reason for us to be spending almost $1 trillion on the military … and I’m going to say we can spend this on other things,” Trump stated.

He further elaborated, “When we straighten it all out, then one of the first meetings I want to have is with President Xi of China and President Putin of Russia, and I want to say let’s cut our military budget in half. And we can do that, and I think we’ll be able to do that.”

Following Trump’s remarks, defense stocks that had previously been trading higher in the day quickly turned downward. Shares of Lockheed Martin dropped 1.6%, Northrop Grumman fell by 3.4%, and General Dynamics declined 2.1%.

Throughout his 2024 campaign and the early days of his presidency, Trump has sent mixed signals regarding military spending.

On one hand, he has enlisted billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk and the so-called Department of Government Efficiency to identify areas where government spending, including defense, could be trimmed. Additionally, Trump has advocated for a swift resolution to the war in Ukraine, a conflict that has led to significant purchases of American weaponry.

Conversely, Trump has repeatedly emphasized the necessity of maintaining a strong military. He has signed an executive order to explore the development of an “Iron Dome of America” missile defense system and has frequently praised U.S. military capabilities. On Thursday, he reiterated, “Right now, people are confused by a number of different crosscurrents” on defense spending.

TD Cowen policy analyst Roman Schweizer commented on the situation, telling CNBC last week, “Right now, people are confused by a number of different crosscurrents” regarding U.S. military expenditures.

Vivek Ramaswamy Launches Campaign for Ohio Governor, Promises a Unique Approach

February 16, 2025February 17, 2025 Staff ReporterProfile 0

Vivek Ramaswamy has officially begun his campaign to become Ohio’s next governor, vowing that his bid will not be “your usual gubernatorial dog-and-pony show.”

The biotech entrepreneur and former Republican presidential candidate marked Valentine’s Day by submitting paperwork to the Ohio Secretary of State’s office, signaling his intent to run in the 2026 election.

Ramaswamy, a 39-year-old Cincinnati native, has yet to make a formal announcement about his campaign. However, he has repeatedly hinted at his interest in pursuing an elected position at the state level.

“Big announcement in Ohio coming on Feb 24. It won’t be your usual gubernatorial dog-and-pony show,” he told The Post on Saturday.

His campaign is expected to officially launch on February 24 at CTL Aerospace Inc. in Cincinnati, followed by a speech at Axium Packaging near Columbus, according to a report by the Associated Press.

A website that appears to be associated with Ramaswamy’s campaign teases “a big announcement” and is funded by “Vivek Ramaswamy for Ohio,” further confirming his political aspirations.

Speculation about Ramaswamy’s gubernatorial ambitions began after he abandoned plans to co-lead the newly proposed Department of Government Efficiency alongside Elon Musk last month.

At that time, a Trump-Vance transition spokesperson informed The Post that Ramaswamy’s interest in running for governor was the primary reason for his departure from the committee tasked with identifying ways to reduce the size of the federal government.

By entering the race, Ramaswamy will compete in a Republican primary to replace Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, who is limited by term restrictions. Other candidates in the GOP primary include Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost and Heather Hill, a former member of the Buckeye State’s Martin Luther King Jr. Commission.

Jon Husted, the former lieutenant governor of Ohio and a perceived frontrunner in the race, withdrew last month after being appointed to the U.S. Senate seat previously held by Vice President JD Vance.

Ramaswamy has already secured endorsements from two Republican officials holding statewide office: Secretary of State Frank LaRose and Treasurer Robert Sprague.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai on What Comes After AI

February 16, 2025February 17, 2025 Staff ReporterTechnology 1

Artificial intelligence is transforming how people work, learn, and live. However, what follows AI? Google CEO Sundar Pichai has shared his insights on what the future might hold. In a recent blog post, he outlined his thoughts on the next major technological advancements. Pichai, who once stated, “AI is bigger than the internet,” acknowledges that innovation will not stop with artificial intelligence.

According to Pichai, three key areas will shape the future of technology, starting with quantum computing. “Quantum computing will push the limits of what technology can do,” he wrote. This emerging field has the potential to address significant challenges in healthcare, security, and scientific research. “Quantum computing will also help scientists discover new medicines… as well as design more efficient batteries for electric cars, and accelerate progress in fusion and new energy alternatives,” said Pichai. He believes quantum computing represents the next fundamental shift in computing, building upon the advancements of AI.

Pichai also highlighted Google’s latest breakthrough in quantum computing. “Our state-of-the-art Willow quantum chip solved a computation in under five minutes that would take a classical computer ten septillion years — that’s a one, followed by twenty-five zeros, longer than the universe has existed, several times over,” he explained. This achievement underscores the immense potential of quantum technology.

In addition to quantum computing, Pichai expects AI to become more intelligent, affordable, and widely accessible. “AI will keep getting better, cheaper, and more useful,” he stated. As AI continues to evolve, it may soon integrate seamlessly into daily life, making interactions with technology feel more natural.

Finally, Pichai envisions a shift in how people interact with technology. “Computers will understand us better,” he suggested. Future devices might respond more intuitively, allowing for effortless communication and engagement with digital tools.

Europe’s Population Shift: Decline Expected Across Most Countries by 2100

February 16, 2025February 17, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

A new map illustrates the expected changes in population levels across European nations from now until the year 2100. The data is derived from the UN World Population Prospects 2024, specifically using the medium variant estimates.

Population Trends in Europe

For several decades, birth rates across Europe have been below the replacement rate required to maintain stable population levels. This trend is expected to continue and intensify in the coming years. Consequently, most European nations are projected to see a decline in population by the end of the century.

The most populous nations on the continent are expected to experience significant shifts. Germany is projected to lose 13.8 million people, Poland will see a decrease of 18.8 million, and Italy is expected to shrink by 23.8 million.

Eastern Europe has been experiencing population declines since the 1990s, and this pattern is anticipated to accelerate further throughout the century. Russia and Ukraine combined are expected to see their populations drop by 40 million people by 2100.

Despite these overall trends, migration—both within Europe and from outside the continent—could help mitigate population loss in some countries. Nations such as the United Kingdom and France are expected to grow rather than shrink due to migration. The UK’s population is projected to increase by 4.8 million, while France is expected to see a growth of 1.8 million.

However, this trend of population growth is expected to be limited to only a few countries. According to the UN’s estimates, just seven European nations will have a larger population in 2100 compared to 2025.

It is essential to note that these are estimates, and projections can differ based on the data source. While the UN suggests a general decline across most of Europe, Eurostat—the official statistical office of the European Union—has a slightly more optimistic outlook. Eurostat’s projections from 2022 indicate that more European countries will experience population growth than the UN anticipates.

Economic and Social Implications for Europe

A declining population presents significant challenges for economies across Europe. Economic systems are not designed to accommodate shrinking populations. A decrease in population directly translates to reduced consumer demand, which is a vital driver of economic growth.

Additionally, a smaller population results in a reduced tax base, which directly impacts the funding of Europe’s extensive social security programs. Many European nations are known for their robust social welfare systems, which could face financial strain if fewer people contribute to tax revenues.

For decades, migration from Asia and the Middle East has played a crucial role in sustaining population growth across Europe. However, the impact of international migration as a population booster is expected to diminish sooner than many anticipate.

Eurostat’s projections suggest that Europe’s population will peak in 2026. After that point, overall population levels are expected to decline, marking a significant demographic shift for the continent.

Modi Returns from U.S. Meeting with Unmet Trade Demands and Tariff Concerns

February 15, 2025February 17, 2025 Staff ReporterIndia 0

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had been banking on a series of concessions before his meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump to maintain favorable ties with Washington, especially after weeks of tariff threats.

However, these efforts fell short.

As Modi heads back to New Delhi, he faces the looming prospect of increased duties on Indian exports and heightened pressure to purchase more American products—ranging from energy to advanced U.S. weapons systems. The meeting highlighted that the warm rapport the two leaders shared during Trump’s first term has its limits.

The discussions marked the first official meeting between Modi and Trump since 2020 and underscored Trump’s determination to revamp trade relationships with all nations, including close U.S. allies. Hours before their meeting, Trump announced that the U.S. would begin imposing “reciprocal” tariffs. He also openly criticized India’s trade policies while standing alongside Modi at a press conference.

“India has been to us just about the highest-tariffed nation in the world,” Trump said at the White House, with Modi standing beside him. “Whatever India charges, we’re charging them.”

Indian officials familiar with the meeting emphasized that it was not entirely negative. While India is waiting for details on the reciprocal tariffs, officials noted that an agreement to pursue a bilateral trade pact provides a platform for negotiation. They spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the discussions.

Modi was one of the earliest foreign leaders to visit Trump, joining the ranks of the prime ministers of Japan and Israel. The visit followed years of strengthening ties between India and the U.S., as Washington has strategically engaged India as a counterbalance to China’s growing influence in the region.

Several U.S. corporations, including Apple Inc. and Starbucks Corp., have significantly expanded their operations in India, tapping into the country’s growing consumer market while seeking to diversify away from Chinese supply chains.

Even during Trump’s first term, when he and Modi had a friendly rapport, India’s tariff policies remained a recurring point of contention. Now, with Trump’s second term underway, Modi has taken a more flexible stance, reducing import tariffs on various goods, including Harley-Davidson Inc. motorcycles.

Further demonstrating its willingness to accommodate U.S. demands, New Delhi announced on Thursday a reduction in taxes on American bourbon, cutting the rate from 150% to 100%—a key demand from Washington.

A senior U.S. official, speaking to Bloomberg News anonymously, described these steps as minor but welcomed. However, it was evident that Modi left Washington with a list of further actions to take, as Trump underscored his intent to reduce the U.S.’s $41 billion trade deficit with India.

“We believe that India still remains in Trump’s line of fire on reciprocal tariffs, even as the two countries have reiterated their strategic partnership,” said Sonal Varma, chief economist for India at Nomura Singapore Ltd.

India’s Ministry of External Affairs and Finance Ministry did not immediately respond to requests for further clarification.

Increased U.S. Defense Sales on the Horizon

Among India’s most notable commitments was its pledge to increase purchases of American energy and military equipment. India currently relies primarily on Russia for its defense needs and energy supplies, but Washington has long sought to reduce Moscow’s influence in these sectors.

In response, Trump announced that the U.S. would offer India the opportunity to purchase Lockheed Martin Corp.’s F-35 fighter jets, further strengthening defense cooperation between the two countries. However, any such deal faces hurdles due to the jet’s exorbitant cost and concerns about technology security, given India’s deep defense ties with Russia.

“The timeframe for the F-35 sale remains unclear, but it’s clearly something Trump will push hard given the revenue that the U.S. can draw from selling such an expensive system,” said Michael Kugelman, director at the South Asia Institute of the Wilson Center.

Despite these defense discussions, Modi did not secure any definitive commitment from Trump regarding the continuation of the H-1B visa program, which facilitates legal immigration for high-skilled Indian workers to the U.S. This program is a key concern for India’s technology sector. However, Modi did express openness to repatriating undocumented Indian migrants from the U.S., a stance that has drawn political criticism back home.

One topic that was notably absent from the discussions was the ongoing legal troubles of Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, who has been indicted in the U.S. for allegedly paying hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes to Indian government officials. Adani, a close ally of Modi, has denied the allegations.

“Personal Matters” Off the Table

“When it comes to such personal matters, two leaders of two countries will not get together on the topic and discuss anything on an individual matter,” Modi stated during the press conference.

Despite their disagreements, Modi and Trump concluded their meeting on a positive note by setting ambitious goals for future cooperation. Both leaders committed to expanding bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030, a significant increase from $126.6 billion in 2023. Additionally, they reaffirmed their commitment to deepening defense and technological collaboration.

However, the discrepancy between India’s tariffs on U.S. imports and America’s relatively lower duties remains a critical sticking point. This imbalance puts India in a weaker negotiating position when discussing a comprehensive trade deal with the U.S., according to Shumita Deveshwar, chief India economist at GlobalData.TS Lombard.

“There are more concessions to be made because, for us, the U.S. is a far bigger market than India is for the U.S.,” she noted. “We do come from a position of disadvantage into these talks.”

As Modi returns to India, his government must now navigate the next steps in trade negotiations, balancing Washington’s demands while safeguarding India’s economic interests.

Munich Security Conference Highlights Growing NATO Divisions Amid Ukraine Crisis

February 15, 2025February 17, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

U.S. Vice President JD Vance, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky, and nearly 60 world leaders and policymakers are set to gather in Munich for the annual Munich Security Conference (MSC) over the next three days.

For nearly two decades, this event has been a focal point for global security discussions, but this year, the stakes appear higher than ever. A senior Western official described the current global security climate as “the most dangerous and contested time” of their career.

Cracks in the International Order

The established global security structure, often referred to as the International Rules-based Order, is facing unprecedented strain. Some argue it is already beginning to collapse.

When Russian President Vladimir Putin launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago, much of the world condemned the move. NATO, the European Union, and Western nations demonstrated remarkable unity in supporting Ukraine, ensuring it could defend itself without direct Western military intervention.

While Hungary and Slovakia occasionally expressed reservations, there was broad consensus that Putin’s invasion needed to fail to prevent Russia from further aggression, possibly against NATO members like Estonia. The prevailing belief was that Ukraine should receive whatever it needed to achieve a strong negotiating position for lasting peace.

U.S. Shifts Policy on Ukraine

However, that unity has begun to fray. Former President Donald Trump has significantly undermined Ukraine’s stance by declaring—through his Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth—that restoring Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is “not realistic.” Additionally, the U.S. has dismissed Kyiv’s aspirations for NATO membership, a key goal for President Zelensky, and ruled out sending troops to defend Ukraine from potential future Russian invasions.

Further rattling Western allies, Trump recently held a cordial 90-minute phone call with Putin, abruptly ending a three-year diplomatic freeze. This shift in U.S. policy suggests a preference for quickly ending the war, even if it means meeting many of Moscow’s demands.

Over the coming days in Munich, Trump’s team is expected to outline their plans for Ukraine, with retired U.S. Army General Keith Kellogg traveling to Kyiv next week for further discussions. However, a clear rift has emerged between Washington and Europe. While the U.S. prioritizes ending the war swiftly, European leaders had, until recently, believed that sustained pressure on Moscow—amid significant Russian battlefield casualties and economic struggles—could secure a more favorable peace for Ukraine.

NATO’s Growing Divisions

Beyond Ukraine, other cracks are emerging within NATO. Trump’s recent announcement of his interest in “buying” Greenland—an autonomous territory of Denmark—has sparked fresh tensions. When Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen firmly stated that “Greenland is not for sale,” Trump reportedly reacted with a “horrendous” phone call and did not rule out using force to take the territory.

The notion of a NATO country threatening to seize another member’s land was once unthinkable. In Greenland’s case, U.S. security interests are already well-served, as the island hosts more American troops than Danish forces, and Copenhagen has been open to strengthening mutual defense arrangements.

While many in Scandinavia hope Trump’s proposal is mere rhetoric, the broader damage is already done. His remarks signal a troubling precedent—that using force against neighbors for territorial gain is acceptable.

Former UK National Security Adviser and Ambassador to Washington, Lord Kim Darroch, warned that Trump’s threats against Denmark—whether economic or military—send a dangerous message. “Even if nothing comes from it, it’s done great damage. It’s another signal of Trump’s disdain for NATO. And it will be interpreted in Moscow and Beijing as a message that they have a free hand in Ukraine and Taiwan respectively,” he said.

At the Munich Security Conference, European allies will seek reassurance from Washington that NATO remains strong. However, Trump appears determined to reshape America’s global role and seems unlikely to heed European concerns.

Americans See Federal Overspending but Want More Funding for Social Security and Key Programs

February 15, 2025February 17, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

Many Americans believe the federal government is overspending, yet polling suggests that a significant number, including Republicans, think funding for major programs like Social Security is insufficient.

Surveys from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research indicate that as former President Donald Trump and adviser Elon Musk advocate for sweeping budget cuts—including reductions in humanitarian aid and potential cuts to the Department of Education and the military—many Americans may not support their approach to trimming federal expenditures.

A January AP-NORC poll found that about two-thirds of Americans believe the government is spending too little on Social Security and education. Additionally, roughly six in ten think more funding should go toward assistance for the poor, and a similar percentage say that Medicare—the health insurance program for seniors—is underfunded. Many also believe Medicaid lacks adequate financial support. Meanwhile, about half of respondents feel that border security is not receiving enough funding.

This presents an ongoing dilemma for lawmakers: while most Americans believe the government isn’t allocating enough money to key programs, they also broadly support budget cuts. A March 2023 AP-NORC poll revealed that six in ten U.S. adults thought the government was spending too much overall.

Foreign Aid Seen as a Primary Area of Overspending

One area where Americans largely agree on overspending is foreign aid. The 2023 AP-NORC poll showed that a majority of Americans believe too much money is directed to other countries.

Approximately seven in ten U.S. adults said the government allocated excessive funds to “assistance to other countries.” This sentiment was particularly strong among Republicans—nearly nine in ten thought foreign aid was overfunded, compared to just over half of Democrats.

Richard Tunnell, a 33-year-old veteran from Huntsville, Texas, believes the U.S. intervenes too frequently in international affairs. An independent voter who supported Trump in the last election, Tunnell appreciates Trump’s “America First” agenda.

“Americans need to worry about Americans,” Tunnell said. “There’s atrocities happening on American soil just as much as there is on foreign soil. You know, if we can’t clean up our own house, why the hell are we trying to clean up somebody else’s house?”

However, surveys suggest that many Americans overestimate how much of the federal budget is spent on foreign aid. Research from KFF found that, on average, Americans believe foreign aid accounts for 31% of the budget, when in reality, it is closer to 1% or less.

Bipartisan Agreement on Social Security and Medicare

Few Americans, regardless of political affiliation, think the country spends too much on Social Security or Medicare. However, opinions diverge when it comes to military spending, border security, Medicaid, and assistance programs for low-income individuals.

About one-third of U.S. adults believe the military receives excessive funding, while another third think the budget is about right. The remaining third feel the military is underfunded. A partisan divide is evident: most Republicans argue that military funding is too low, while nearly half of Democrats say it receives too much money.

Jeremy Shouse, a 38-year-old Democrat from Durham, North Carolina, believes social programs should receive as much funding as the military.

“I think it’s really a slap in our faces as Americans,” Shouse said, expressing frustration over the lack of funding for programs like Medicaid, which he has personally relied on.

“When it comes down to school, Medicaid, any type of government assistance programs, the money is just kind of not there,” he added. “Not like it is for the military or the Army.”

A strong majority of Democrats believe too little is spent on assistance for the poor, education, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. When it comes to border security, Democrats are more divided—about four in ten feel the funding is appropriate, while the remaining respondents are evenly split between those who believe it’s too high and those who think it’s too low. Regarding federal law enforcement agencies such as the CIA and FBI, most Democrats feel funding levels are about right.

Republicans, on the other hand, tend to support increased funding for border security, Social Security, and the military. About eight in ten Republicans believe the government allocates too little to border security, while roughly two-thirds say Social Security needs more funding.

Despite these divisions, the overall data suggests a paradox: while Americans frequently argue that the federal government overspends, many simultaneously believe that crucial domestic programs remain underfunded.

The Crisis of Hindi Cinema and the Media’s Role in Its Decline

February 15, 2025February 17, 2025 Staff ReporterCulture 0

Hindi cinema has been struggling for quite some time now, facing a downturn that is hard to ignore. Quality films often fail to get the recognition they deserve, while subpar productions occasionally succeed but mostly flounder. This has led to what can be described as an existential crisis for Bollywood—India’s second-greatest obsession after cricket.

Several factors have contributed to this crisis, but beyond the excessive greed of multiplex owners, which has alienated core audiences, and the shifting perspectives of moviegoers, another key culprit is the media. Rather than serving as a stabilizing force or at least offering some support, the media has been largely irresponsible, immature, and, at times, even malicious. From social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube to print and online publications, the role played by the press in shaping public perception of Hindi cinema has been overwhelmingly negative.

The Decline in the Quality of Film Journalism

A significant issue with modern film journalism is the lack of deep understanding among those covering the industry. Many of today’s journalists are young and lack substantial knowledge or independent analysis of how Hindi cinema evolved into what it is today. Rather than developing informed perspectives, they often rely on one another, so-called “experts,” or personal biases shaped by their admiration for specific filmmakers, stars, or genres. Very few have a genuine passion for cinema or approach their critiques with objectivity.

Many of these individuals aspire to be filmmakers or screenwriters themselves, which often makes them critical of mainstream Bollywood storytelling. They scoff at elements that have been part of Hindi cinema’s DNA for over eight decades simply because these tropes do not align with the aesthetics of world cinema, particularly its critically acclaimed segments.

There is also a faction of critics who blindly idolize South Indian cinema, which, in itself, is not problematic. However, their excessive praise of regional films often comes at the expense of Hindi movies, leading to unnecessary comparisons and an unfair dismissal of Bollywood’s contributions.

Focusing on Non-Issues

Another distraction in the discourse surrounding Hindi cinema is the undue attention given to so-called “nepotism” and “nepo-kids.” While these terms have lost their significance in Bollywood, they still dominate discussions—despite nepotism thriving even more prominently in South Indian film industries. Critics paradoxically celebrate South cinema as being “grounded” while dismissing Hindi films that tell similar stories as being disconnected from reality.

Moreover, Hindi cinema’s biggest stars, both seasoned and emerging, are frequently criticized for their supposed lack of talent. The line between personal and professional criticism is blurred, leading to unwarranted attacks on actors.

Ignorance and the Abuse of Influence

The biases of film journalists extend to their preferences for certain filmmakers and actors, often disregarding public sentiment. Directors like Anurag Kashyap, Hansal Mehta, and Vishal Bhardwaj, to name a few, receive disproportionate praise, while many truly talented artists go unnoticed. The industry’s fixation on international recognition further exacerbates this trend—global accolades take precedence over domestic achievements, even when Indian audiences fail to connect with these celebrated filmmakers.

There is a growing pattern of outright dismissal of Hindi cinema. While film reviews were once secondary to audience decisions, today, they have an outsized influence. With ticket prices at an all-time high, moviegoers increasingly rely on reviews to decide whether a film is worth watching. Unfortunately, many critics appear more interested in tearing down Bollywood than offering constructive feedback.

Another problem lies in the inconsistent reporting of box office figures. While some journalists inflate earnings to make a film appear more successful than it is, others take a contrarian approach, prematurely labeling movies as flops. Often, films are declared failures even before their release, and post-launch, every effort is made to justify these predetermined verdicts. This creates confusion among audiences, leaving them unsure about a movie’s actual performance.

Of course, box office numbers should not be the sole measure of a film’s worth. A good film does not lose its artistic merit simply because it underperforms commercially. However, exaggerated earnings reports contribute to the growing distrust in media, reinforcing the perception that journalism is tainted by bias and monetary incentives.

The term “paid media” has become increasingly relevant, as even honest journalists are painted with the same brush as those who distort facts for personal gain. Conversely, individuals who peddle negativity under the guise of “telling it like it is” are lauded as voices of integrity.

One senior critic in the industry, who once enjoyed great reverence, was notorious for his inconsistent opinions. He would harshly critique a film, then later praise one aspect of it while condemning the director’s next project. In another instance, he would criticize one movie but later use it as a benchmark to deride another film from the same filmmaker. Audiences began to notice these contradictions, exposing his lack of credibility.

Yet, that was an era when such behavior was still limited. Today, the dominant trend among critics is outright hostility. The tools of their trade—keyboards, microphones, and cameras—are wielded not as instruments of fair critique but as weapons of destruction.

The Rise of Agenda-Driven Journalism

A troubling development in recent years is the increasing number of journalists launching their own platforms, using them to fabricate, amplify, and sustain controversies. They manipulate narratives, cite unverifiable “sources,” and enlist supposed “authorities” to lend credence to their claims. Their primary motivation is not truth but digital engagement—views, likes, and revenue. The impact of their misinformation is growing, influencing public perception in dangerous ways.

One recent example involves a passionate cinephile named Vikram, who happens to be related to a legendary film personality. Vikram had long been influenced by a biased film columnist, often adopting the same views without independent thought. However, when he engaged with me in a private conversation regarding a particular film, I suggested he watch it himself rather than rely on second-hand opinions. Filmmaking, after all, is an arduous process, and while the results may vary from awful to brilliant, every film deserves a fair assessment. To his credit, Vikram acknowledged the validity of my argument.

Unfortunately, not everyone is as willing to challenge their preconceptions. Many simply accept media narratives without question, which is why responsible, honest journalism is more crucial than ever.

What the Media Should Be

A true champion of Hindi cinema should not impose conditions on their appreciation of the industry. Just as a parent or teacher supports a child through challenges, journalists should stand by Bollywood during its rough patches. Constructive criticism is vital, but it should be offered with the intent to improve, not to destroy.

The absence of such support has left a void. Instead of acting as a guiding force, today’s media is complicit in Bollywood’s struggles. If Hindi cinema is to regain its strength, it needs a press that values integrity over sensationalism, fairness over favoritism, and encouragement over perpetual condemnation.

Ultimately, Bollywood’s fate does not rest solely in the hands of filmmakers, actors, or audiences. The media wields significant influence in shaping narratives, and if it continues on its current path, it may contribute to the very downfall it claims to lament.

Modi and Trump Discuss Trade, Tariffs, and Strategic Partnerships

February 14, 2025February 17, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump convened at the White House to deliberate on trade and other bilateral matters.

During their meeting, Trump disclosed an agreement for India to increase imports of American oil and gas, a move intended to help reduce the trade deficit between the two nations.

This discussion followed Trump’s recent announcement of a new reciprocal tariff policy. The US president remarked that “our allies are worse than our enemies” regarding import duties, emphasizing his administration’s stance on trade imbalances.

The reciprocal tariffs, which will be applicable to all US trading partners, are the latest in a series of trade measures introduced by the Trump administration. However, a definitive implementation date has yet to be established. Trump has previously used tariff threats as a negotiation strategy.

Trade and Tariffs Take Center Stage

Donald Trump has often referred to tariffs as “the most beautiful word in the dictionary,” and today was no exception.

Before sitting down with Modi, Trump spent nearly an hour addressing the media about his “reciprocal tariffs” strategy. Details remain scarce, but the approach seems to involve imposing tariffs on countries based on the trade restrictions they impose on US goods.

The meeting between Modi and Trump largely focused on this issue. “Whatever India charges, we charge them,” Trump told a room packed with reporters awaiting an update on their bilateral discussions.

Apart from tariff talks, the two leaders worked on strengthening trade relations. Modi highlighted India’s interest in securing its energy needs through increased trade in oil and gas with the US. Meanwhile, Trump confirmed that military sales to India would also be expanded.

Concerns Over Immigration Policies

Trump’s return to the White House has rekindled anxiety among Indian professionals working in the US, particularly those on H-1B visas.

During his first term, Trump tightened restrictions on the H-1B visa program, significantly increasing rejection rates from 5-8% under President Obama to 24% in 2018. Although it remains uncertain whether such policies will be reinstated, many Indian workers fear renewed challenges.

While some industry leaders, including Tesla CEO Elon Musk, have expressed support for the H-1B system, Trump’s administration remains divided on immigration policy.

Indians, who account for 72% of all H-1B visas issued, are especially vulnerable. Their concerns extend beyond visa restrictions to potential hostility toward Indian immigrants.

One of the most pressing issues is Trump’s attempt to deny automatic US citizenship to children born to temporary foreign workers. Although blocked by federal courts, the policy could be revived through higher judicial rulings.

A shift in birthright citizenship laws would disproportionately impact the Indian community. With over five million Indians in the US holding non-immigrant visas, many expectant parents are anxiously seeking clarity on their children’s legal status.

From ‘Namaste Trump!’ to ‘Howdy, Modi!’

Trump and Modi have shared a warm diplomatic relationship. In 2020, Modi hosted Trump in India with a grand rally at the world’s largest cricket stadium in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The event, called “Namaste Trump!,” featured music and dance performances, drawing tens of thousands of attendees.

During his address, Modi lauded Trump’s leadership, stating, “Trump thinks big and the world knows what he has done to realise the American dream.”

This visit followed the “Howdy, Modi!” event in 2019, where Modi and Trump addressed 50,000 members of the Indian diaspora at a Houston football stadium. The two leaders exchanged smiles and hugs while making strong proclamations about their growing partnership.

However, analysts suggest that these events, while grand spectacles, are also strategic diplomatic moves aimed at solidifying ties between the two nations.

Shifts Since the ‘Howdy, Modi!’ Event

Much has changed since Modi’s 2019 visit to Houston, where he and Trump were the center of a large-scale community event.

At the time, Trump described the gathering as a “profoundly historic event,” possibly the largest reception of a foreign leader in US history. For Modi, the event was a platform to showcase India’s growing global influence and his popularity among the Indian diaspora.

Five years later, their relationship remains strong, but the US-India dynamic has grown more complex.

Modi, though still a popular leader, has faced political challenges at home, failing to secure an outright majority in last year’s elections. India’s economy has slowed, prompting foreign investors to withdraw capital.

Tensions over trade and H-1B visa policies persist, and diplomatic relations were tested last year after an alleged plot by an Indian agent to assassinate a Sikh separatist in the US.

However, India’s role as a strategic counterbalance to China remains a crucial element of US foreign policy.

Modi’s Agenda in Washington

Modi’s visit comes at a delicate moment, as his “Make in India” initiative faces challenges from Trump’s “America First” policy.

Unlike their 2017 meeting in Washington, which was marked by camaraderie, this visit is overshadowed by global trade disputes and Trump’s emphasis on tariffs. The White House has already announced plans for new reciprocal tariffs on Indian imports.

Modi’s primary goal is to mitigate the impact of these tariffs while ensuring that India remains an indispensable US ally.

He stated that he is open to lowering tariffs on American goods, repatriating undocumented Indian nationals, and increasing US imports of American oil to help balance trade.

Beyond trade, Modi aims to enhance cooperation in technology, defense, and energy, emphasizing common strategic interests.

Politically, he is using the visit to reaffirm India’s status as a key US partner in the Indo-Pacific, particularly in countering China’s growing influence.

While Trump’s voter base views India as an economic competitor, the personal rapport between the two leaders may help ease tensions.

The Strategic Importance of US-India Relations

Modi is among the first foreign leaders to visit Trump in his second presidential term, underscoring the significance of US-India relations.

Both nations share deep concerns over China’s ambitions and are part of the Quad alliance, aimed at countering Beijing’s influence in the Asia-Pacific.

Trade ties between the two countries are also substantial. The US is India’s second-largest trading partner, while India serves as a major market for American multinational corporations.

In recent years, companies like Taiwan’s Foxconn—an Apple supplier—have been shifting production to India as part of a broader move away from reliance on China.

The two countries also maintain strong people-to-people ties, driven by the large Indian diaspora in the US. However, illegal migration from India has become a growing concern for Washington.

Earlier this month, a US military aircraft deported a group of shackled Indian migrants back to India. Their treatment sparked outrage among India’s opposition leaders, adding another layer of diplomatic tension to an already complex relationship.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Sworn in as Trump’s Health Secretary Amid Vaccine Skepticism

February 14, 2025February 15, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. officially took office as Secretary of the Health and Human Services (HHS) Department on Thursday after a narrow Senate confirmation vote, placing him in charge of a $1.7 trillion budget that oversees vaccine policies, food safety regulations, and health insurance programs that impact nearly half of the U.S. population.

The Senate voted 52-48 in favor of Kennedy, with nearly all Republicans backing former President Donald Trump’s nominee despite reservations about his controversial views on vaccines. Every Democrat opposed his confirmation.

The only Republican to break ranks was Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell, who had polio as a child. His opposition mirrored his stance against Trump’s previous nominees for Secretary of Defense and Director of National Intelligence.

“I’m a survivor of childhood polio. In my lifetime, I’ve watched vaccines save millions of lives from devastating diseases across America and around the world,” McConnell stated. “I will not condone the re-litigation of proven cures, and neither will millions of Americans who credit their survival and quality of life to scientific miracles.”

Shortly after taking office, Kennedy appeared on Fox News with Laura Ingraham and announced his intention to establish a more rigorous system to monitor vaccine side effects.

Republicans have largely embraced Kennedy’s approach to public health, particularly his focus on tackling chronic illnesses like obesity.

“We’ve got to get into the business of making America healthy again,” said Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, who believes Kennedy will introduce a “fresh perspective” to the role.

During his swearing-in ceremony at the Oval Office, Kennedy was accompanied by his wife, other family members, and several members of Congress. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch administered the oath. Reflecting on his connection to the White House, Kennedy recalled visiting as a child in 1961, when his uncle, President John F. Kennedy, was in office.

Trump announced that Kennedy would lead a new commission to study chronic diseases, an initiative Kennedy praised. He described Trump as a “pivotal historical figure” and expressed gratitude for his role in his life and career.

Kennedy, 71, has long been in the public eye due to his family legacy and personal tragedies. Over the years, he has cultivated a dedicated following through his outspoken views on food safety, chemicals, and vaccines—stances that have at times veered into extreme territory.

His influence grew significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic when he devoted much of his efforts to a nonprofit organization that filed lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers. He also leveraged social media to foster skepticism about vaccines and the government agencies responsible for promoting them.

Despite his history of questioning vaccine safety, Kennedy, with Trump’s endorsement, argued that he was in a unique position to restore trust in public health institutions like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., voiced optimism about Kennedy’s potential to reshape the health care system, saying he hoped Kennedy “goes wild” in curbing medical costs and improving overall public health.

However, before offering his support, Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., a physician and chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, sought assurances from Kennedy that he would not alter existing vaccine recommendations.

During his confirmation hearings, Senate Democrats repeatedly challenged Kennedy to disavow the long-debunked claim that vaccines cause autism. Some legislators also raised concerns about whether Kennedy could personally profit from altering vaccine policies or weakening legal protections for pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines.

Financial disclosures revealed that Kennedy earned more than $850,000 last year through a referral arrangement with a law firm that has sued the manufacturers of Gardasil, a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine that helps prevent cervical cancer. To address potential conflicts of interest, Kennedy pledged that if confirmed, he would redirect the earnings from this arrangement to his son.

Kennedy assumes leadership of HHS amid a sweeping federal restructuring led by billionaire Elon Musk. This overhaul has resulted in the suspension—at least temporarily—of billions of dollars in public health funding, leaving thousands of federal employees uncertain about their job security.

On Friday, the NIH announced that it would limit billions of dollars allocated to medical research, particularly in areas such as cancer and Alzheimer’s treatment.

Kennedy has also called for a major shake-up within the NIH, FDA, and CDC. Last year, he vowed to terminate 600 employees at the NIH, which serves as the nation’s largest financial supporter of biomedical research.

In his Fox News interview, Kennedy reiterated his plans to overhaul staffing at HHS and its affiliated agencies, targeting officials responsible for what he views as poor decisions regarding nutrition guidelines and Alzheimer’s treatments.

“I have a list in my head,” Kennedy said, referring to potential dismissals within the agency.

Modi’s U.S. Visit to Test His Relationship with Trump Amid Tariff Concerns

February 13, 2025February 15, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s established camaraderie with President Donald Trump faces a significant test as he begins his visit to Washington on Wednesday. Modi is keen to ensure India avoids tariffs that have been imposed on other nations and to mitigate the risk of additional taxes on Indian imports.

India, recognized as a crucial strategic ally of the United States, has not yet been subjected to any new tariffs. The two leaders have nurtured a personal bond, with Modi—often criticized for India’s democratic decline—welcoming Trump’s return to the White House. Modi aims to recalibrate India’s relationship with the West, especially in light of his refusal to denounce Russia for its invasion of Ukraine.

Despite this relationship, Trump has frequently labeled India as a “tariff king” and pushed for the South Asian nation to facilitate the deportation of migrants. In response, India has shown openness to lowering tariffs on American goods, accepting the return of Indian citizens, and increasing its purchase of U.S. oil.

However, with tariff threats still looming, the crucial question remains: How much does personal rapport between the two leaders matter, and how far is India willing to go to reach a trade agreement?

Scrutiny on Body Language

During Trump’s first term, Modi built a strong working relationship with the U.S. president. The two leaders can capitalize on areas of alignment and “minimize areas of friction without conceding on core areas of national interest,” stated Meera Shankar, India’s former ambassador to the U.S.

“Most other partners have their reciprocal lists ready from the word go, because it’s a point of leverage when you negotiate,” Shankar explained, expressing optimism that India “will find the right balance between firmness and flexibility” when dealing with tariffs.

Modi, strengthened by his Hindu nationalist party’s victory in last weekend’s crucial state legislature election in India’s federal territory, including New Delhi, described the visit as an “opportunity to build upon” past collaboration and “deepen our partnership” in sectors such as technology, trade, defense, and energy.

Trump’s Expectations

During a conversation with Modi in January, Trump underscored the need for India to increase purchases of U.S.-made military equipment and weapons, as well as reduce the trade deficit. In 2023, the United States imported $50 billion more in goods from India than it exported.

According to a White House readout at the time, Trump “emphasized the importance of India increasing its procurement of American-made security equipment and moving toward a fair bilateral trading relationship.”

Earlier this month, India complied with a U.S. request to accept the return of 104 migrants on a military plane, marking the first such repatriation flight under a crackdown ordered by the Trump administration.

Additionally, Modi’s government has lowered certain high tariffs, including reducing duties on some Harley-Davidson motorcycles from 50% to 40%. In 2023, India also lifted retaliatory tariffs on American almonds, apples, chickpeas, lentils, and walnuts.

“Another thing we can expect is that Modi would offer to purchase more American (natural) gas to narrow the U.S. trade deficit,” said Lisa Curtis, director of the Indo-Pacific security program at the Washington-based Center for a New American Security. “This will help a little bit.”

Concerns Regarding China

India plays a pivotal role in the U.S. strategy to counterbalance China in the Indo-Pacific region. Later this year, it is set to host a summit of the Quad alliance, which includes the U.S., India, Japan, and Australia.

However, India might have to reassess its position if Trump’s administration pursues a diplomatic thaw with China.

“Trump’s outreach to China will complicate India’s ability to cultivate the American desire to use India as a proxy against China without actually ever becoming one,” noted Happymon Jacob, founder of the New Delhi-based Council for Strategic and Defense Research.

India recently took steps to improve ties with China. In December, both countries agreed to work toward resolving their longstanding border dispute in the Himalayas, which had led to a deadly military clash in 2020.

“Even a tactical accommodation between the U.S. and China has implications for India,” Shankar remarked.

Potential Defense Agreements

The United States remains India’s largest trading partner, with a trade imbalance of $50 billion in favor of India. The total Indo-U.S. trade in goods and services reached approximately $190.1 billion in 2023. According to India’s External Affairs Ministry, U.S. exports to India were valued at nearly $70 billion, while Indian exports to the U.S. stood at $120 billion.

India remains heavily reliant on Russia for military supplies, with about 60% of its defense equipment sourced from Moscow. However, uncertainties surrounding the Ukraine war have pushed New Delhi to explore alternative suppliers, including the U.S., Israel, and Britain.

A recent deal will enable U.S.-based General Electric to collaborate with Hindustan Aeronautics in manufacturing jet engines for Indian fighter aircraft. Additionally, India has agreed to purchase U.S.-made MQ-9B SeaGuardian armed drones.

Since 2008, India has signed contracts for over $20 billion worth of American defense equipment.

“For India, that could also be an area where we see some synergies with the U.S.,” Shankar stated, adding that Trump is expected to encourage further defense procurements by India.

Raja Mohan, an analyst at the Institute of South Asian Studies in Singapore, views Modi’s visit as a crucial moment to advance Indo-U.S. ties.

“India’s diplomatic skills will be tested, so the general goodwill that exists between Trump and Modi should be translated into concrete outcomes,” Mohan emphasized.

Senate Confirms Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence in Partisan Vote

February 13, 2025February 15, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

The Senate confirmed Tulsi Gabbard as the director of national intelligence in a largely party-line vote on Wednesday, overcoming strong objections from Democrats and initial concerns from Republicans regarding her qualifications and past statements. The 52-48 vote concluded two months of deliberations on whether the former Hawaii congresswoman was suited to lead the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies and brief President Trump daily on security matters.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was the sole Republican to vote against Gabbard’s confirmation. Some Republican senators had initially questioned her stance on intelligence-gathering practices, particularly her past opposition to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). While serving in the House, Gabbard had pushed for repealing the law, which grants broad surveillance authority. Additionally, concerns arose over her past remarks about Syrian leader Bashar Assad and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

During confirmation hearings, both Democratic and Republican senators pressed Gabbard on whether she viewed former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden as a traitor. Snowden had stolen 1.5 million classified documents, an act that frustrated many lawmakers. Despite repeated questioning, Gabbard declined to label him a traitor, which further frustrated Republicans.

Republican senators also noted that Gabbard struggled to articulate clear answers in private meetings. Senator Susan Collins was among those initially doubtful, questioning whether Gabbard had genuinely embraced the surveillance powers under Section 702, which provides roughly 60% of the intelligence included in the president’s daily brief.

However, Republicans eventually united behind Gabbard after Vice President J.D. Vance played a key role in swaying support. Vance worked closely with Senator Todd Young, a former Marine intelligence officer, to ease GOP concerns. Additionally, Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Tom Cotton remained a steadfast supporter of Gabbard’s nomination, strengthening Republican backing.

Supporters of Gabbard argue that she represents the kind of “disruptor” Trump seeks in leadership roles. They compare her to Pete Hegseth, the recently confirmed Pentagon chief, and claim that she will overhaul the intelligence community, which they believe has been “weaponized” against Trump. Many Trump allies continue to cite a controversial 2020 letter signed by 51 former intelligence officials, which suggested that reports about Hunter Biden’s laptop could be a “Russian influence operation.”

Vance was instrumental in ensuring Young’s support, holding multiple discussions with him between Gabbard’s turbulent confirmation hearing and the committee vote. The Senate Intelligence Committee ultimately advanced her nomination with full Republican support, leading to a procedural vote on Monday where all Republicans present voted in favor of moving toward final confirmation.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune praised Gabbard as a “patriot, motivated by service,” highlighting her extensive background. “Tulsi Gabbard has worn the uniform of our country for the last 22 years, leading American soldiers in some of the most dangerous parts of the world,” Thune stated. He also emphasized her eight years in Congress, where she served on the House Homeland Security, Foreign Affairs, and Armed Services committees.

Democrats, however, strongly opposed her appointment, arguing that she lacked the necessary experience and had displayed poor judgment on critical intelligence matters. They pointed to her skepticism of U.S. intelligence findings on Assad’s use of chemical weapons and her alignment with Putin’s reasoning for invading Ukraine.

“By any objective measure and by every objective measure as well, she is not qualified,” said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer. “From the moment she was nominated, both Democrats and Republicans were puzzled by the choice.”

Schumer criticized Trump’s selection, stating, “Of all people Donald Trump could have picked to oversee national intelligence, he picked someone known for repeating Russian propaganda and getting duped by conspiracy theories.” He went on to claim that if the vote had been conducted by secret ballot, Gabbard would have received no more than 10 votes.

Senator Mark Warner, the vice chair of the Intelligence Committee, was also outspoken in his opposition. He argued that Gabbard had “demonstrated she’s not up to the task” of representing the intelligence community, citing her defense of Assad’s claim that he had not used chemical weapons, despite U.S. intelligence reports stating otherwise.

Warner further contended that Gabbard had “knowingly met with the Syrian cleric who threatened to conduct serial bomb attacks against the United States” and had unfairly blamed the U.S. and NATO for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. He pointed to her past assertions that the Biden administration had failed to acknowledge Putin’s concerns about Ukraine joining NATO.

Republican senators faced considerable pressure to support Trump’s controversial nominees, including Gabbard, Hegseth, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose confirmation vote for Secretary of Health and Human Services is set for later this week.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse was among the most vocal critics of Gabbard’s appointment, characterizing it as “part of a pattern of unilateral disarmament by the Trump administration against Russia.”

Citing a Washington Post article from November, Whitehouse noted that “Gabbard’s appointment as head of national intelligence elicited the most excitement in Russia because she has long been regarded as a darling of the propagandist Russian R.T. network.”

“Russian TV has called Ms. Gabbard ‘our friend Tulsi,’” Whitehouse said. “[A] Russian newspaper published an op-ed, and it was titled, ‘The CIA and FBI are trembling [that] Trump protégé Tulsi Gabbard will support Russia.’”

Despite these objections, Gabbard’s confirmation received strong backing from Republican leadership. Tom Cotton, a key figure on national security within the GOP, defended her against accusations of disloyalty.

“Let me remind everyone that Ms. Gabbard has served in our Army for more than two decades, she has multiple combat tours, and she still wears the uniform today,” Cotton stated. “She has undergone five FBI background checks.”

One of the primary hurdles Gabbard faced during her confirmation was her prior advocacy for repealing Section 702 of FISA. In the past, she criticized the law as an “overreach” that infringed on civil liberties. However, in private meetings with Republican senators, she clarified that her stance had evolved due to recent reforms to the program.

Senator James Lankford, a member of the Intelligence Committee, revealed that he decided to back Gabbard after she reassured him that she now supported Section 702, describing it as a “vital” tool for national security.

Lankford noted in an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press” that Gabbard had convinced him she would uphold the surveillance authority, which played a crucial role in securing Republican votes for her confirmation.

Ultimately, Gabbard’s path to confirmation reflected the deep divisions in the Senate, with Republicans rallying behind Trump’s pick despite lingering concerns, while Democrats staunchly opposed her, citing her past positions and perceived sympathies toward Russia and Assad.

Indian Students in the US Fear Tightening of OPT Program Amid Political Scrutiny

February 13, 2025February 14, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Indian students and professionals in the United States are growing increasingly concerned about the potential tightening of the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, which serves as a crucial avenue for gaining work experience and transitioning to H-1B visas. Ongoing political debates have led to criticisms that the program is unfair to American workers, leaving thousands of Indian students uncertain about their career prospects.

The Optional Practical Training (OPT) and Curricular Practical Training (CPT) programs have long played an essential role for international students on F-1 visas, providing opportunities for work experience. During the 2022-2023 academic year, around 69,000 Indian students participated in the OPT program. However, recent policy discussions and the legacy of former President Donald Trump’s stricter immigration stance have put the future of these programs at risk.

Understanding OPT and CPT

OPT permits students to work in the U.S. either before or after graduation, granting 12 months of work authorization. Those in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields can apply for a 24-month extension, bringing their total work authorization period to 36 months.

CPT, on the other hand, is tailored for work experiences that are directly tied to a student’s coursework. It allows part-time or full-time employment but comes with a critical restriction—students who complete more than 12 months of full-time CPT become ineligible for OPT.

Both programs require formal approval. While universities oversee the initial process through their Designated School Officials (DSOs), OPT participants must also secure authorization from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

Increased Scrutiny on OPT and CPT

During a U.S. House Judiciary Committee hearing on January 22, 2025, Jessica M. Vaughan, Director of Policy Studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, criticized both OPT and CPT, claiming they lack congressional authorization and are exploited by diploma mills that issue fraudulent work permits. “They should be eliminated or much more closely regulated,” Vaughan stated, emphasizing that these programs have contributed to the growth of the largest guest worker population in the U.S., with approximately 540,000 former students working under minimal oversight.

Concerns over the impact on American workers have also driven legal challenges. In 2022, the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers (WashTech) filed a lawsuit arguing that OPT enables employers to sidestep the H-1B visa cap, ultimately disadvantaging U.S. workers.

Adding to the scrutiny, instances of fraud and security risks have heightened calls for reform. In 2016, U.S. authorities created the fictitious University of Northern New Jersey to expose fraudulent CPT users. Jon Feere, former chief of staff at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), has since highlighted multiple concerns regarding the program’s oversight.

The Issue of No Cap on OPT

The sheer scale of participation in these programs is noteworthy. In the fiscal year 2023, 539,382 foreign students were employed under OPT, STEM OPT, and CPT combined. Unlike the H-1B visa program, which is subject to an annual cap, these programs have no numerical limitations. The breakdown includes 276,452 students under OPT, 122,101 under STEM OPT, and 140,829 under CPT.

Proposed policy changes aim to introduce stricter regulations. Vaughan has suggested implementing stronger oversight on educational institutions that issue visa paperwork, advocating for the revocation of certifications for schools with high student overstay rates. Feere has proposed limiting OPT to fields where practical training is essential for all students, not just international ones, ensuring that the program maintains its educational purpose rather than turning into a source of inexpensive labor.

Pushback from Universities and Tech Industry

Universities have resisted these potential restrictions, arguing that OPT is crucial for attracting international students, who collectively contribute billions of dollars to the U.S. economy. Institutions such as the University of California, Berkeley, actively support OPT as a valuable tool for students to gain real-world experience, enhancing their professional development.

Additionally, leading technology companies—including Google, Microsoft, and Amazon—rely heavily on the OPT program to recruit international talent for roles in software engineering, data science, and product management. These companies value the diverse skill sets and perspectives that international students bring to the workforce, further reinforcing the argument for maintaining the program.

With the future of OPT and CPT under increasing political scrutiny, Indian students in the U.S. are left in a state of uncertainty, hoping that policy decisions will continue to support their career aspirations while addressing broader economic and workforce concerns.

Pope Francis Condemns U.S. Deportation Plans, Warns of Consequences

February 13, 2025February 14, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

Pope Francis issued a strong criticism on Tuesday regarding the Trump administration’s mass deportation plans, cautioning that expelling individuals solely based on their illegal status strips them of their dignity and will have dire consequences.

In an unprecedented move, Francis directly addressed the U.S. crackdown on migrants through a letter to American bishops, appearing to challenge Vice President JD Vance’s theological defense of the deportation strategy.

U.S. border czar Tom Homan promptly dismissed the pope’s comments, pointing out that the Vatican is a city-state enclosed by walls and arguing that border security should remain under his jurisdiction.

As the first Latin American pontiff, Francis has long prioritized the rights and welfare of migrants, frequently citing biblical teachings that emphasize welcoming strangers. He has called on nations to provide protection, integration, and support to those fleeing violence, poverty, and environmental crises, though he acknowledges that governments must operate within their means.

Tensions between the Argentine Jesuit and President Donald Trump on immigration matters date back to Trump’s first campaign. In 2016, Francis famously declared that anyone who builds walls to keep migrants out was “not a Christian.”

In his letter, Francis acknowledged the right of countries to ensure security and safeguard their communities from criminal threats.

“That said, the act of deporting people who in many cases have left their own land for reasons of extreme poverty, insecurity, exploitation, persecution or serious deterioration of the environment, damages the dignity of many men and women, and of entire families, and places them in a state of particular vulnerability and defenselessness,” he wrote.

Referencing the Book of Exodus and Jesus Christ’s own experiences, Francis defended the right of people to seek safety in other countries. He described the deportation plan as a “major crisis” unfolding in the United States.

He urged Christians to critically assess policies that conflate undocumented status with criminal behavior.

“Anyone schooled in Christianity cannot fail to make a critical judgment and express its disagreement with any measure that tacitly or explicitly identifies the illegal status of some migrants with criminality,” he said.

Francis further warned that policies rooted in force rather than fundamental human dignity are doomed to fail.

“What is built on the basis of force, and not on the truth about the equal dignity of every human being, begins badly and will end badly,” he cautioned.

Archbishop Timothy Broglio, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, expressed gratitude for the pope’s message in his response.

“With you, we pray that the U.S. government keep its prior commitments to help those in desperate need,” Broglio wrote. “Boldly I ask for your continued prayers so that we may find the courage as a nation to build a more humane system of immigration, one that protects our communities while safeguarding the dignity of all.”

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt reported last week that over 8,000 people had been arrested in immigration raids since Trump’s inauguration on January 20. Some individuals have already been deported, while others remain in federal custody, including at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba.

Vance, a Catholic convert, has defended the administration’s hardline immigration approach by invoking the medieval Catholic concept of “ordo amoris,” which describes a hierarchy of love—placing family first, followed by neighbors, local communities, and then the broader world.

Francis appeared to challenge Vance’s interpretation in his letter.

“Christian love is not a concentric expansion of interests that little by little extend to other persons and groups,” he wrote. “The true ordo amoris that must be promoted is that which we discover by meditating constantly on the parable of the ‘Good Samaritan,’ that is, by meditating on the love that builds a fraternity open to all, without exception.”

David Gibson, director of Fordham University’s Center on Religion and Culture, remarked on social media that Francis’ letter directly countered Vance’s theological claims.

“[It] takes aim at every single absurd theological claim by JD Vance and his allies in conservative Catholicism (and the Catholic electorate),” Gibson posted.

Vance’s argument had gained traction among conservative Catholics, including the Catholic League, which backed his interpretation of the hierarchy of Christian love.

In Crisis Magazine, editor Eric Sammons defended Vance’s stance, citing the teachings of St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas.

“For Augustine, every love, even the love of neighbor, must be ordered beneath the love of God,” Sammons wrote. “This hierarchy extends to our human relationships where love for family, community, and nation should precede our love for the world at large, not in intensity but in priority of duty and responsibility.”

Homan, also a Catholic, dismissed the pope’s stance and argued that Francis should focus on Church affairs rather than U.S. border policy.

“He wants to attack us for securing our border. He’s got a wall around the Vatican, does he not?” Homan told reporters in a video posted by The Hill. “So he’s got a wall around that protects his people and himself, but we can’t have a wall around the United States.”

The Vatican, a 44-hectare (108-acre) walled city-state within Rome, has also implemented strict border measures. A law enacted in December imposes prison sentences of up to four years and fines of up to 25,000 euros ($25,873) on those who enter illegally using force, threats, or deception to bypass security.

The U.S. bishops conference had previously criticized Trump’s immigration policies, calling them “deeply troubling” in an unusually strong statement. The bishops warned that measures concerning immigration, foreign aid, capital punishment, and environmental policies would have harmful consequences, especially for vulnerable populations.

This marked a notable rebuke from the Catholic hierarchy in the U.S., which has traditionally prioritized opposition to abortion as a central political concern. Many bishops had previously supported the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision—enabled by Trump-appointed justices—to overturn constitutional protections for abortion.

Despite tensions between the Church and Trump’s policies, Catholic voters helped secure his victory in the 2024 election, giving him 54% of their votes—a notable increase from the 50% he received in 2020 when he ran against President Joe Biden, a fellow Catholic.

Bishop Mark Seitz of El Paso, Texas, who leads the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ migration committee, welcomed the pope’s letter as an important source of support in a challenging climate.

“We are dealing with these very threatening circumstances towards immigrants, towards our immigrant brothers and sisters, and also towards those who assist them in any way,” Seitz stated.

Speaking to The Associated Press, Seitz emphasized that while it’s important to acknowledge the concerns of Americans, including Catholic Trump supporters, regarding immigration, Church leaders must continue to uphold its teachings.

“But we have to just steadfastly announce the truth as best we understand it, both in terms of the teaching of the church and the reality on the ground,” he added.

Dr. Sampat Shivangi – A Tribute

February 13, 2025February 14, 2025 Ajay GhoshProfile 0

Dr. Sampat Shivangi, a physician, philanthropist, influential Indian American community leader, and a veteran leader of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) for several decades suddenly passed away due to health reasons in his hometown, Jackson, Mississippi on February 10, 2025. In him, the Indian-American community has lost a great leader, and friend whose contributions will continue to resonate for generations.

A trailblazer of the Indian Diaspora, Dr. Shivangi has left an indelible mark on the Indian American community. Over the decades, he dedicated his time, resources, and efforts to serving AAPI and numerous other Indian-American organizations. His leadership, vision, and tireless commitment to advocating for the community set him apart as a pillar of strength and guidance.

It was only about a month ago that the President of India, Droupadi Muramu inaugurated the newly built Dr. Sampat Kumar S. Shivangi Cancer Hospital in Belagavi, Karnataka. Spanning 1,75,000 square feet with a capacity of 300 beds, the hospital was built with cutting-edge technology with funds donated and raised by Dr. Sampat Shivangi, a distinguished Indian American community leader with a profound impact on healthcare, education, and cultural preservation across India and the United States.

“A dream comes true! It fills my heart with immense pride and gratitude for the new state-of-the-art Dr. Sampat Kumar S Shivanagi Cancer Hospital in my beloved home state, Belagavi, has finally become a reality,” Dr. Sampat Shivangi, who donated his family fortunes to build this much needed, cancer hospital in a rural region in the state of Karnataka, said.

“Having lived in India for three decades, in not so privileged and progressive parts of the world, it always touched my heart and Atma why so and why not we all have equal playing field on earth,’ Dr. Shivangi said, when asked about what led him to to donate his money, time, efforts and skills.

“During my years in hospitals as a student, resident and staff, I was devastated. I had a great desire to do something that helps people, including for the need to establish a cancer hospital in my native town, where people have to travel hundreds of miles away for such a treatment and possibly could not afford the travel, stay, or medical expenses.”

Describing the goals of the Cancer Hospital and the Charitable Foundation, Dr. Shivangi, a soft-spoken physician says, “The Charitable Foundation was set up several years ago to establish, promote, and provide the needy and the downtrodden fellow human beings with opportunities to access quality education, promote mental health awareness, ensure healthcare equity, support tribal communities in their holistic development, empower women to break barriers, and leverage sports as a catalyst for positive change.”

In addition to establishing the Dr. Sampat Kumar S. Shivangi Cancer Hospital in Karnataka, through the Dr. Sampat Shivangi Foundation, Dr. Shivangi has established multiple charitable institutions in India, including primary and middle schools, community halls, and healthcare facilities, greatly enhancing educational and healthcare access for underserved communities.

Dr. Shivangi has been actively involved in several philanthropic activities, serving with Blind Foundation of MS, Diabetic, Cancer and Heart Associations of America. Dr. Shivangi has a number of philanthropic works in India including Primary & Middle Schools, Cultural Center, and IMA Centers that he opened and helped to obtain the first ever US Congressional grant to AAPI to study Diabetes Mellitus amongst Indian Americans.

Dr. Shivangi was deeply involved in numerous organizations, both in the U.S. and India, and worked on initiatives that supported healthcare, education, and cultural preservation. Notably, he played a key role in organizing AAPI’s Legislative Day, a pivotal event where lawmakers and community leaders discuss critical issues affecting Indian Americans.

In the U.S., Dr. Shivangi has contributed to establishing a Hindu Temple in Jackson, Mississippi, providing a cultural and spiritual hub for the Hindu community and beyond. Recognized for his exemplary service, a street in Mississippi bears his name, a testament to his contributions to healthcare and community welfare.

Over the years, in the pursuit of its vision, the Dr. Sampat Shivangi Foundation has come to be known for its belief and tireless efforts that every individual deserves an opportunity to thrive, and is a beacon of hope, fostering resilience and building a more inclusive and harmonious world for all.

At the heart of societal transformation, the Dr. Sampat Shivangi Foundation stands as a testament to unwavering commitment and compassion. The foundation is built upon the pillars of education, healthcare, mental well-being, tribal support, women’s empowerment, and sports development. With a profound understanding of the multifaceted needs of underprivileged communities, we have designed a range of initiatives that address these vital aspects of human well-being.

Born in Athani, Karnataka in India on October27, 1940, Dr. Shivangi studied medicine at Karnataka Medical College, Hubli Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, and at the Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. He migrated to the US in 1976.

Dr. Shivangi served as Advisor to the US Secretary of Health and Human Services from 2005 to 2008 during the George W. Bush administration. He was the founding president of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin in Mississippi and was a former president and chair of the India Association of Mississippi. Dr. Shivangi attended several National Republican Conventions as a Delegate. He was recognized as Person of the Year by the Indian American Republican Committee.

As the first Indian American to serve on the Board of the Mississippi State Department of Mental Health, Dr. Shivangi has made significant strides in mental health advocacy. His leadership extends to national positions, serving on the National Board of Directors for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), appointed by Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

A dedicated advocate for Indo-U.S. relations, Dr. Shivangi has contributed to key initiatives, including the Indo-U.S. Civil Nuclear Agreement, collaborating with President George W. Bush to strengthen ties between the two nations. His commitment to India is further reflected in his coordination efforts with the White House to lift sanctions against India during President Bill Clinton’s administration.

A recipient of numerous awards, including the Pravasi Bharatiya Samman Award, The US Congressional Recognition Award, the Ellis Medal of Honor Award, Lifetime Achievement Award by the Indo-American Press Club, Dr. Shivangi’s legacy reflects a lifelong dedication to improving lives through healthcare, philanthropy, and international diplomacy. He joined the Executive Advisory Board of the Washington, D.C.-based think tank International Leaders Summit. The state of Mississippi honored Dr. Shivangi by naming a lane after him in one of the premier medical facilities at Boswell Regional Medical Center.

Dr. Shivangi said, he always thought about why, the Indian Americans especially, the Physician fraternity, consisting of more than 100,000 physicians in the United States are not willing to undertake philanthropy in their homeland or in USA. “My hope and prayers is that, many more will follow me just as my dream has come true today. I urge my fellow Indo-American physicians to join this movement and help change the world for the better. My humble request is that let us be the change, and bring this movement to make our world different tomorrow. I hope my prayers will be answered one day and all humanity lives in a better world.”

Shivangi is married to Dr. Udaya S. Shivangi, MD, and the couple are blessed with two daughters: Priya S. Shivangi, MS (NYU); and Pooja S. Shivangi, who is an Attorney at Law. His passing leaves a profound void in the community, but his legacy will continue to inspire future generations and his absence will be deeply felt. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and loved ones during this profoundly difficult time.

Trump Meets Jordan’s King Abdullah, Reiterates Plan to Clear Gaza for Redevelopment

February 12, 2025February 13, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

President Donald Trump welcomed Jordan’s King Abdullah II to the White House on Tuesday, once again pushing his controversial idea of evacuating Gaza’s population, placing it under U.S. control, and transforming it into a tourist destination.

This ambitious but highly improbable proposal to reshape the Middle East would require Jordan and other Arab nations to take in displaced Gazans. However, after their meeting, Abdullah reaffirmed his opposition to such a move.

Their discussion took place in the Oval Office, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio also present. Although Trump had previously suggested withholding U.S. aid from Jordan or Egypt if they refused to accept more people from Gaza, he appeared to backtrack on that stance.

“I don’t have to threaten that. I do believe we’re above that,” Trump stated. This contradicted his earlier remarks, where he had implied that reducing U.S. assistance was a possibility.

When asked multiple times about Trump’s plan to empty Gaza and convert it into a Mediterranean resort, Abdullah refrained from making any concrete remarks or committing to taking in large numbers of displaced Gazans.

However, the Jordanian leader did express his country’s willingness to accept up to 2,000 ill or cancer-stricken children from Gaza “right away.”

“I finally see somebody that can take us across the finish line to bring stability, peace and prosperity to all of us in the region,” Abdullah remarked, referring to Trump during their meeting.

After spending about two hours at the White House, Abdullah proceeded to Capitol Hill for discussions with a bipartisan group of lawmakers. Later, he posted on X, stating, “I reiterated Jordan’s steadfast position against the displacement of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.”

“This is the unified Arab position. Rebuilding Gaza without displacing the Palestinians and addressing the dire humanitarian situation should be the priority for all,” he wrote.

Despite Abdullah’s firm stance, Trump used the meeting to once again suggest that the U.S. could assume control of Gaza. He claimed this wouldn’t require American financial contributions but insisted that placing the region under “U.S. authority” was feasible, though he did not elaborate on what that would entail.

“We’re not going to buy anything. We’re going to have it,” Trump said regarding U.S. control in Gaza. He envisioned constructing new hotels, office buildings, and residences, promising that the region would be “exciting.”

“I can tell you about real estate. They’re going to be in love with it,” Trump added, referencing his background in property development, while also maintaining that he had no personal interest in handling the redevelopment.

Trump has previously suggested that Gaza’s population could be relocated, either temporarily or permanently—an idea that has been met with strong opposition across the Arab world.

The former president also reiterated that a fragile ceasefire between Hamas and Israel could be scrapped if Hamas failed to release all remaining hostages by midday Saturday. He first raised this point on Monday but acknowledged that Israel would ultimately decide on the matter.

“I don’t think they’re going to make the deadline, personally,” Trump commented on Tuesday, referring to Hamas. “They want to play tough guy. We’ll see how tough they are.”

Abdullah’s visit coincided with a critical period for the ceasefire in Gaza. Hamas has accused Israel of breaching the truce and has delayed the release of more hostages captured during its attack on October 7, 2023.

Following Trump’s remarks, Hamas issued a statement calling them “racist” and “a call for ethnic cleansing.” The group also accused the former president of attempting to “liquidate the Palestinian cause and deny the national rights of the Palestinian people.”

Trump has repeatedly proposed that the U.S. should control Gaza and transform it into “the Riviera of the Middle East.” His vision includes relocating Palestinians to neighboring nations without granting them a right of return.

However, his statements on Tuesday contradicted his previous stance on potentially withholding U.S. aid from Jordan and Egypt—two long-standing American allies and top recipients of foreign assistance—if they refused to accept additional Palestinians from Gaza.

Jordan already hosts over 2 million Palestinians, and its government has remained resolute in opposing forced displacement. Last week, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi stated that his country’s stance on Gaza’s population transfer was “firm and unwavering.”

Beyond concerns over jeopardizing the longstanding objective of a two-state solution, both Egypt and Jordan have expressed private security fears about admitting large numbers of displaced Palestinians, even on a temporary basis.

Trump first outlined his plans for relocating Gaza’s residents and asserting U.S. control over the region during a press conference last week alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

At the time, the former president did not rule out deploying American troops to help secure Gaza but simultaneously insisted that no U.S. funds would be allocated for its reconstruction—raising significant questions about how his proposal could be implemented.

Following Trump’s initial remarks, both Secretary of State Marco Rubio and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt sought to clarify that his administration envisioned only a “temporary” relocation of Palestinians from Gaza. They claimed the move would allow for essential tasks such as clearing debris, disposing of unexploded ordnance, and reconstructing the region.

However, when asked in a Fox News interview on Monday whether displaced Palestinians would eventually be permitted to return to Gaza, Trump firmly responded, “No, they wouldn’t.”

Egg Prices Surge Amid Bird Flu Outbreak, Shortages, and Thefts

February 12, 2025February 13, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

Eggs are not only costly due to the ongoing bird flu outbreak but are also becoming increasingly difficult to find. In some areas, stores have even started limiting how many cartons customers can purchase.

The high demand for eggs has led to unusual incidents, including thefts where culprits appear to treat eggs as valuable as gold.

The outbreak remains a persistent issue as the virus continues to mutate, spreading among birds, other animals, and even some humans. Whenever a chicken or turkey contracts the virus, the entire flock is culled to contain the disease.

While egg shortages are not uniform across all regions, predicting when a large poultry farm might be affected is impossible. A single outbreak in a major farm with millions of birds can significantly impact supply.

Consequently, egg prices have soared.

Jose Castillo, co-owner of Norma’s Sweets Bakery in New Orleans, has found it increasingly challenging to maintain affordable prices for Cuban sandwiches and king cakes due to soaring egg costs.

“Oh, it’s hurting man. It’s crazy how expensive eggs are,” Castillo said. “Normally we’ll get them for $35, $40 dollars a case and now we’re paying like $118, $120 dollars.”

Hard to find

Across the country, empty egg shelves have become a frequent sight. Many shoppers must visit multiple stores or turn to local farmers to secure eggs.

The bird flu outbreak, which began in 2022, has significantly impacted the poultry industry. Nearly 158 million birds have been culled, with most being egg-laying hens.

This mass slaughter has diminished egg supplies, pushing prices higher. However, with over 300 million chickens producing eggs nationwide for breakfast and baking, the industry is generally resilient enough to handle the loss of a few million birds without major disruptions.

The issue arises when mass cullings occur. In January alone, more than 23 million birds were slaughtered, following the December loss of 18 million.

Once egg farmers are forced to euthanize their entire flock, it takes at least one to two months before new hens can be introduced. The delay is due to the time required to dispose of carcasses and properly sanitize barns before restocking can occur. As a result, supply issues persist for weeks or even months.

Limiting purchases

In response to the shortage, some retailers have begun rationing egg sales.

Trader Joe’s has enforced a nationwide limit of one carton per customer per day.

“We hope these limits will help to ensure that as many of our customers who need eggs are able to purchase them when they visit Trader Joe’s,” the company said in a statement to The Associated Press on Tuesday.

Other retailers, including Costco, Whole Foods, Kroger, and Aldi, have also implemented varying restrictions. However, not all are imposing national limits.

A Kroger spokesperson confirmed that the supermarket chain has not set company-wide purchase limits. However, some regional divisions and store locations have restricted customers to buying no more than two dozen eggs per visit.

Walmart, meanwhile, has only limited bulk purchases. “Although supply is very tight, we’re working with suppliers to try and help meet customer demand, while striving to keep prices as low as possible,” the Bentonville, Arkansas-based retail giant said in an emailed statement. The company clarified that only 60-count cartons have been capped at two per purchase.

An expensive option

The price of eggs has reached staggering levels. The nationwide average cost per dozen soared to $4.15 in December—more than double the summer 2023 price.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture predicts prices will rise by another 20% this year.

As Easter approaches, demand for eggs is expected to climb due to their traditional role in holiday dishes and Easter egg hunts.

On Wednesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics is set to release updated inflation data, and egg prices are anticipated to have climbed even further. However, they are unlikely to surpass the record-high average of $4.82 per dozen set in January 2023.

These figures only reflect national averages. In some areas, consumers are already paying more than $10 per dozen, particularly for organic or cage-free options.

The impact extends beyond grocery stores, with some restaurants also raising prices. Waffle House, for example, recently announced a 50-cent surcharge per egg on all menu items.

Cracking the case

With eggs commanding such high prices, thefts have become an unexpected consequence.

Seattle police recently investigated the theft of over 500 eggs from a restaurant.

Surveillance footage from Luna Park Cafe in West Seattle captured two men entering a refrigerated storage shed last Wednesday in the early morning hours. The suspects stole approximately 540 eggs, liquid egg products, bacon, ground beef, and blueberries before loading the stolen items into a van. Authorities estimated the value of the stolen breakfast items at around $780.

A larger-scale theft took place earlier this month in Pennsylvania. Approximately 100,000 eggs were stolen from the back of a Pete & Gerry’s Organics distribution trailer in Antrim Township. The theft occurred around 8:40 p.m. on a Saturday night, according to police reports.

The stolen eggs had an estimated value of $40,000.

As bird flu continues to spread, disrupting egg supplies and driving prices higher, consumers and businesses alike are feeling the strain. With no immediate relief in sight, shoppers may have to brace for further price hikes and ongoing shortages.

India to Cut Tariffs Further Ahead of Modi-Trump Meeting Amid Trade and Immigration Concerns

February 11, 2025February 13, 2025 Staff ReporterIndia 0

India is preparing to implement additional tariff reductions on American goods before Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., this week. The move comes as both nations attempt to navigate concerns over trade tensions and visa policies for Indian skilled workers.

Modi will be the third foreign leader to be welcomed by the White House since Trump began his second term last month, following visits from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Japan’s Shigeru Ishiba. His trip takes place against the backdrop of rising anger in India over the recent deportation of more than 100 undocumented Indian migrants from the U.S.

Foreign policy experts believe that Modi and Trump will focus discussions on immigration, trade, and arms deals, with China also expected to be a key topic. Trump has sought India’s support in countering China’s growing influence in the region.

According to Reuters, citing unnamed government officials, Modi’s administration is preparing further tariff reductions to bolster U.S. exports to India and avert a potential trade war. The cuts follow a recent decision by the Indian commerce ministry to lower duties on high-end motorcycles, reducing levies on bikes with engines above 1,600cc from 50% to 30% and on smaller models to 40%, in response to Trump’s longstanding demand regarding import taxes on motorcycles such as Harley-Davidson.

Before departing for France and the U.S., Modi expressed optimism about his meeting with Trump, stating, “I look forward to meeting my friend President Trump. This visit will be an opportunity to build upon the successes of our collaboration in his first term and develop an agenda to further elevate and deepen our partnership, including in the areas of technology, trade, defence, energy, and supply chain resilience.”

The announcement of Modi’s visit coincided with the arrival of a U.S. deportation flight carrying 104 Indian migrants to the northern city of Amritsar. The individuals, ranging in age from 4 to 46, were reportedly shackled and chained during transit, a development viewed as embarrassing for India and Modi, who has often highlighted his close ties with Trump.

Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration, a key component of his election platform, has led to an increase in deportations. Bloomberg News reported that India has already committed to repatriating nearly 18,000 undocumented Indian nationals from the U.S. The Pew Research Center estimates that 725,000 illegal Indian immigrants currently reside in the United States.

Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar addressed concerns over the treatment of deportees in parliament, stating, “It is standard practice for U.S. authorities to restrain deportees, but this wasn’t done to women and children on the plane.” However, this claim was challenged by some of the returned migrants, who asserted that even women were shackled during the flight.

Jaishankar also noted that India is actively engaging with the U.S. government to ensure deportees are not mistreated in transit. Meanwhile, Trump has expressed confidence that India “will do the right thing” regarding illegal immigration.

In addition to addressing trade tensions, India hopes to secure assurances from the Trump administration on legal migration pathways, particularly concerning student visas and H-1B visas for skilled workers. Indians account for nearly three-quarters of the 386,000 H-1B visas issued in 2023. These visas are primarily granted to professionals in technology, healthcare, engineering, and finance sectors.

Trump has indicated support for skilled immigration, stating, “I like very competent people coming into our country even if that involves them training and helping other people that may not have the qualifications they do.” However, New Delhi remains concerned about Trump’s broader stance on Brics, an economic alliance that includes India and China.

Milan Vaishnav, director of the South Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, explained India’s strategic approach, stating, “India’s posture of appeasement is not unique, but it’s very clever. By making preemptive concessions on relatively minor issues, governments can allow Trump to put quick wins on the board without enduring too much pain themselves.”

Trump, for his part, has praised Modi, calling him a “great leader” and affirming that the two nations are “committed to a mutually beneficial and trusted partnership.” However, he has also criticized India’s trade policies in the past, accusing the country of imposing excessive tariffs and even referring to it as a “tariff king.”

During a phone conversation with Modi last week, Trump emphasized the necessity of “moving towards a fair bilateral trade relationship,” according to a White House readout. India, in turn, has worked to prevent a trade conflict with the U.S., its largest trading partner.

Trump has already initiated a trade war with China, with both nations imposing retaliatory tariffs on various goods. Additionally, the U.S. president has threatened to impose 100% tariffs on Brics nations if they attempt to introduce an alternative currency to challenge the U.S. dollar’s dominance.

Defense agreements are also expected to be a significant point of discussion during Modi’s visit. Trump has urged India, the world’s largest arms importer, to purchase more U.S.-made military equipment. Last month, he encouraged Modi to increase India’s acquisitions of American security technology while also working toward a more balanced trade relationship.

Negotiations between India and the U.S. are already underway for the co-production of Stryker combat vehicles, manufactured by General Dynamics and used by the American military. Additionally, the two nations are reportedly finalizing a deal to co-produce fighter jet engines in India for the Indian Air Force, an agreement that was initially reached in 2023.

Sanjeev Kumar, India’s defense production secretary, acknowledged the ongoing discussions, stating, “We certainly wish to expedite the transaction which we would like to have with the United States.”

Despite India’s cooperative stance, some analysts warn that making too many concessions to Trump may lead to further U.S. demands. Amitendu Palit, an economist at the National University of Singapore, cautioned, “Trump’s trajectory is if you agree to him once, you can’t be sure that it is done forever, because he will come back asking for a higher price. That’s a challenge.”

As Modi and Trump prepare to meet, the discussions are expected to cover a broad range of issues, including trade, immigration, defense collaboration, and geopolitical challenges. While India seeks to secure its interests in legal migration and trade stability, the U.S. is likely to push for greater economic and military cooperation. The outcome of the meeting will determine the trajectory of Indo-U.S. relations under Trump’s second term.

Judge Rules Trump Administration Violating Court Order on Federal Funding Freeze

February 11, 2025February 13, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

A federal judge in Rhode Island ruled Monday that the Trump administration is violating a court order by continuing to freeze funding for federal programs.

In a strongly worded decision, U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell Jr., who is overseeing a lawsuit brought by 22 states and the District of Columbia, ordered the administration to restore and resume the frozen funding immediately.

This ruling presents a significant challenge to recent suggestions that if President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and the Department of Government Efficiency’s leader, Elon Musk, disagree with a judge’s order, they may choose to disregard it. Michel Paradis, a constitutional law professor at Columbia Law School, noted the importance of the ruling.

Over the past few days, Vance wrote on X, formerly Twitter, “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” while Musk signaled his support for an X user’s suggestion that Trump openly defy court rulings. Meanwhile, Trump stated over the weekend that judges should not have the authority to challenge recent actions by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Commenting on Monday’s court order, Paradis told Business Insider, “That’s some tough language. The judge is not messing around.” He added, “It’s return fire, to the extent that the Trump administration has declared that neither Congress nor the courts are allowed to question his authority.”

McConnell’s order responded to evidence presented by the plaintiff states, which showed that the funding freeze—previously deemed “likely unconstitutional” and causing “irreparable harm”—was still in effect despite the court’s prior ruling.

“The States have presented evidence in this motion that the Defendants in some cases have continued to improperly freeze federal funds and refused to resume disbursement of appropriated federal funds,” McConnell wrote.

The court was presented with descriptions of continued disruptions in funding to the plaintiff states, including allocations from the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Energy, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health and Human Services. Programs such as Head Start, which provides early childhood education, were among those affected.

“The Defendants must immediately restore frozen funding” while the court continues to consider the states’ claims and the administration’s arguments in favor of the freeze, McConnell’s order stated.

The Trump administration swiftly responded by filing a notice to appeal both the judge’s original January 31 order and Monday’s ruling.

Asked whether the administration would comply with the latest order, a White House spokesperson criticized the legal challenges to Trump’s executive actions.

“Each executive order will hold up in court because every action of the Trump-Vance administration is completely lawful,” said Harrison Fields, the principal White House deputy press secretary.

“Any legal challenge against it is nothing more than an attempt to undermine the will of the American people,” he added, stating that voters had chosen Trump to “restore common-sense policies.”

Paradis suggested that if the court order continues to be ignored, McConnell could find the defendants—including Matthew Vaeth, the acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—in contempt of court.

Trump is also named as a defendant in the lawsuit. However, Paradis noted that holding a sitting president in contempt presents a “constitutionally complex issue” and remains “a totally open question.”

“There are plenty of people who say that just as you can’t prosecute the president, you can’t hold them in contempt because it creates a separation of powers problem,” he explained.

Eagles Dominate Chiefs in Super Bowl Rematch, Winning 40-22

February 10, 2025February 11, 2025 Staff ReporterSports 0

The Philadelphia Eagles secured a decisive victory over the Kansas City Chiefs, avenging their 2023 loss with a commanding 40-22 win.

The Chiefs entered the Super Bowl aiming to make history by becoming the first team ever to win three consecutive championships. Instead, they ended up setting a record of a different kind.

Kansas City’s offense had a disastrous first half, managing only 23 yards and failing to score a single point. It was one of the worst offensive performances by any team in Super Bowl history. The Eagles controlled the game from the opening whistle to the final play, though the Chiefs added two late touchdowns in the last three minutes of the fourth quarter to slightly narrow the gap.

The level of dominance was evident even before the game ended. With nearly three minutes remaining in the fourth quarter, as the Chiefs cut the deficit to 26 points with a meaningless touchdown, Eagles players were already celebrating. They poured Gatorade over their head coach, Nick Sirianni, in anticipation of their victory.

The Chiefs’ offensive struggles were apparent throughout the game. They recorded only one first down in the first half, a shockingly poor performance for a team that had come in with high expectations. Quarterback Patrick Mahomes, usually known for his clutch performances, had one of the worst games of his postseason career. He was sacked six times, lost a fumble, and threw two costly interceptions, both of which the Eagles capitalized on for touchdowns.

In contrast, Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts delivered a spectacular performance. He threw for 221 yards, rushed for 72, and accounted for three total touchdowns. His early success included a signature “tush push” touchdown in the first quarter, while his 46-yard strike to wide receiver DeVonta Smith in the third quarter extended the Eagles’ lead to 34 points, essentially sealing the game.

The lone bright spot for the Chiefs was their ability to contain Eagles running back Saquon Barkley, who was limited to just 57 rushing yards. However, that effort did little to change the outcome. Additionally, Barkley’s total rushing yards for the season, including the playoffs, reached 2,504 yards—the highest single-season total in NFL history.

With this victory, the Eagles secured their second Super Bowl championship, adding to their first title win in 2018.

Record-Breaking Legal Betting on Super Bowl Sunday

Legal sports betting on this year’s Super Bowl was projected to hit an all-time high, with an estimated $1.39 billion wagered. This surpasses the $1.25 billion bet in 2024, according to the American Gaming Association (AGA). The record-breaking betting activity also coincided with warnings from officials urging fans to be cautious of scams and fraudulent schemes targeting those eager to place wagers.

The continued rise in sports betting has also raised concerns about gambling addiction, with experts emphasizing the importance of responsible gaming measures.

“Choose Love” Replaces “End Racism” in NFL End Zones

For this year’s Super Bowl, the NFL decided to replace the end zone slogan “End Racism” with a new message: “Choose Love.”

Gene Demby of Code Switch analyzed the shift, explaining how it fits into the larger discussion about diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within the league and beyond.

Tailgate Culture: A Unique American Tradition

One of the defining aspects of American sports culture is tailgating—where fans gather to cook and share food before games, creating a communal experience.

At a Philadelphia Eagles tailgate, fans prepared and served a variety of foods, including omelets and cheesesteaks, offering a glimpse into the deep-rooted tradition of hospitality and camaraderie among football supporters.

Tourism in New Orleans Remains Strong Despite Recent Attack

Despite last month’s terrorist attack, New Orleans has continued to attract visitors, demonstrating the resilience of its tourism industry.

Tourism is a crucial part of the city’s economy. In 2022, around 17 million tourists visited New Orleans, spending over $9 billion. Much of this tourism occurs during Mardi Gras, making the New Year’s Day attack particularly concerning, as it happened just before the peak season. However, a month after the incident, tourists are still arriving in large numbers, reinforcing the city’s reputation as a top travel destination.

US Embassy Launches ‘Mission India’ to Celebrate Ties Between the United States and India

February 10, 2025February 11, 2025 Staff ReporterIndia 0

In a distinctive initiative aimed at strengthening diplomatic relations between Washington and New Delhi, the U.S. Embassy has announced the launch of ‘Mission India.’

The announcement was made on X (formerly Twitter) by Jennifer Larson, the U.S. Consul General of Hyderabad, who underscored the enduring and deep-rooted ties between the two countries. She emphasized the rich cultural heritage and the long-standing economic partnerships that unite the United States and India.

“The United States and India, the world’s oldest and largest democracies, are both incredibly culturally rich countries that have much in common,” Larson stated in a video posted on X.

She further elaborated on the growing collaboration between the two nations, particularly in advancing a free, open, and prosperous Indo-Pacific region. She cited recent discussions between U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar as an example of their shared commitment to regional stability and economic growth.

Throughout February, the U.S. Mission in India will commemorate the partnership between the two nations through a month-long event designed to highlight how individuals, communities, and cultures inspire and enrich one another.

“This month, Mission India will celebrate how individuals, communities, and cultures come together to inspire each other in the Indo-Pacific region and the rest of the world in powerful ways,” Larson said.

One of the notable individuals highlighted in the X video was Chandrika Tandon, a Chennai-born Indian-American businesswoman, philanthropist, and Grammy-winning musician. Her album Triveni won Best New Age, Ambient, or Chant Album at the 67th Grammy Awards, exemplifying her influential contributions to music and beyond.

“We will celebrate the rich tapestry of cultures that create our vibrant communities and explore the values that inspire and guide us, including respect for others,” Larson stated. She emphasized that the celebrations will focus on fostering people-to-people relationships through investments, partnerships, educational opportunities, and eligible travel. These efforts, she added, would help strengthen the connection between the United States and India, ultimately contributing to a safer, stronger, and more prosperous shared future.

The month-long festivities will also pay tribute to those who have shaped the global influence of American music, a cultural force that resonates deeply in India. Larson expressed her belief in the power of cultural connections, stating, “We believe in the power of bringing people together to build vital relationships that drive positive change.”

The U.S. Consulate General of Hyderabad also shared a post on X, inviting the public to participate in the celebrations. “This February, we will be celebrating the various cultures and communities that bring the United States and India closer together to build a safe, secure, and prosperous future for all! Listen to @USCGHyderabad. Jennifer Larson detailing how we plan on celebrating this month. #USIndiaFWDforAll,” the post read.

Trump’s Tax Cut Plan Could Cost Up to $11.2 Trillion, Watchdog Warns

February 9, 2025February 10, 2025 Staff ReporterHealth 0

A new analysis by a budget watchdog group has projected that former President Donald Trump’s proposed tax cuts could result in a loss of between $5 trillion and $11.2 trillion in federal revenue over the next decade.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, an organization that advocates for reducing deficits, identified the primary source of this revenue loss as the extension of the 2017 tax cuts for individuals and small businesses. These cuts are set to expire at the end of 2025. The group warned that Trump’s overall tax strategy could “explode” the national debt and lead to “a serious debt spiral” unless offset by spending reductions or tax hikes elsewhere.

The analysis highlighted that the precise cost of Trump’s tax proposals depends on details of the provisions, some of which have yet to be finalized.

During a closed-door meeting with House Republican leaders on Thursday, Trump outlined his tax priorities, which included eliminating taxes on tips, overtime pay, and Social Security benefits. He also proposed new tax breaks for products manufactured within the United States. Additionally, he suggested lifting the cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction, which his 2017 tax law had set at $10,000 per household.

While Trump has proposed certain tax increases—such as eliminating the carried interest deduction and ending tax benefits for sports team owners—these changes would only have a minor impact on reducing the deficit, the committee estimated.

If the proposed tax cuts are implemented without corresponding tax increases or spending cuts, the national debt could rise significantly, reaching between 132% and 149% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2035. This is a sharp increase from the current level of nearly 100% of GDP and an estimated 118% within a decade if tax laws remain unchanged, according to the committee’s projections. Even without Trump’s proposed tax cuts, the national debt is expected to climb due to the increasing costs of Social Security and Medicare benefits for the retiring Baby Boomer generation, as well as interest payments on existing debt.

House Republicans are working on a budget plan to advance Trump’s agenda, but disagreements persist over the extent of spending cuts needed to offset revenue losses and which programs should be targeted.

Meanwhile, Senate Republicans are preparing to move forward next week with a $300 billion spending plan focused on strengthening border security and defense. However, they plan to delay addressing tax policy and other contentious issues that have divided the party until later in the year.

Black Population in the U.S. Reaches 48.3 Million, Marking Significant Growth Since 2000

February 9, 2025February 10, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

The number of Black people living in the United States reached a record high of 48.3 million in 2023, reflecting a 33% increase since 2000, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of government data. The Black population has become increasingly diverse, with more individuals identifying as belonging to multiple racial backgrounds.

For Black History Month, key insights into the country’s Black population have been highlighted. This analysis focuses on three primary groups: non-Hispanic Black individuals of a single race, non-Hispanic multiracial Black individuals, and Black Hispanics. However, it is important to note that Black Hispanics are distinct from the Afro-Latino population.

A Changing Demographic Landscape

Since 2000, the Black population has increased from 36.2 million to 48.3 million, with a significant rise in those identifying as multiracial. The number of Black individuals who also identify with another race has surged by 269%, while those who identify as Hispanic have increased by 210%. This reflects a broader national trend of growing racial diversity and a shift in how Americans identify their racial backgrounds. Additionally, immigration from Africa, the Caribbean, and other regions has contributed significantly to this growth.

State-Level Trends in Black Population Growth

The Black population has expanded most rapidly in states that historically had smaller Black communities. Utah witnessed the highest growth rate, with an 89% increase between 2010 and 2023. Other states with substantial Black population growth include Arizona, Nevada, and Minnesota, each experiencing a 60% rise during the same period.

Texas, Florida, and Georgia saw the largest numerical increases in Black residents between 2010 and 2023. Texas added 1.2 million Black residents, while Florida and Georgia saw increases of 800,000 and 610,000, respectively. As a result, these states now have larger Black populations than New York, which had the highest Black population in 2010.

Meanwhile, some areas saw declines. Between 2010 and 2023, the Black population decreased by 2% in both Mississippi and Illinois, and by 1% in Washington, D.C.

Metro Areas with the Largest Black Populations

The New York City metropolitan area continues to have the highest number of Black residents in the U.S., with approximately 3.8 million Black individuals living there in 2023. Other metro areas with large Black populations include Atlanta (2.3 million), Washington, D.C. (1.8 million), and Chicago (1.7 million).

As a proportion of the overall population, Atlanta leads among metro areas with at least 1 million Black residents. In 2023, 37% of Atlanta’s population was Black. Other metro areas with significant Black population shares include Washington, D.C. (28%), Philadelphia (23%), and Detroit (23%).

Among major metro areas, Dallas experienced the highest percentage growth in Black residents, increasing by 47% between 2010 and 2023. In contrast, Detroit saw no net growth, while Los Angeles recorded a slight decline of 1%. Although the Black population within Washington, D.C., itself decreased, the overall Black population in its larger metro area grew by 3%.

A Young Population Compared to Others

The U.S. Black population remains relatively young. In 2023, the median age of Black Americans was 32.6 years, compared to 39.2 years for those who do not identify as Black. Additionally, 27% of Black Americans were under the age of 18, a higher percentage than among non-Black Americans (21%).

The median age varies among different Black demographic groups. In 2023, the median age was:

35.4 years for single-race, non-Hispanic Black individuals
21.7 years for Black Hispanic individuals
19.5 years for multiracial, non-Hispanic Black individuals

Rising Educational Attainment Among Black Americans

Educational achievement among Black Americans has steadily improved. In 2023, 27% of Black adults aged 25 and older—equivalent to 8.2 million people—had earned at least a bachelor’s degree, nearly doubling from 14.5% in 2000.

Both Black women and men have seen increased levels of higher education, though Black women have experienced the most significant gains. In 2023, 30.1% of Black women aged 25 and older held at least a bachelor’s degree, up from 15.4% in 2000. By comparison, 23.6% of Black men in this age group had attained at least a bachelor’s degree, rising from 13.4% in 2000.

Marriage and Relationship Trends

Black Americans are less likely to be married compared to the general population. In 2023, 48% of Black adults had never been married, whereas only 29% of non-Black adults remained unmarried.

Black men were more likely than Black women to be married, with 36% of Black men being married in 2023 compared to 29% of Black women. Meanwhile, Black women were more likely than Black men to be divorced, separated, or widowed, with 25% of Black women falling into these categories compared to 15% of Black men.

Interracial Marriage and Spouse Demographics

Approximately 18% of married Black adults had a spouse of a different race in 2023. Among married Black men, 21% were married to someone who was not Black, while 13% of married Black women had non-Black spouses. These figures account only for couples living in the same household.

However, Black women were more likely than Black men to have a Black spouse. In 2023, 87% of married Black women had a Black spouse, compared to 79% of married Black men. This includes spouses who identify as single-race Black, multiracial Black, or Black Hispanic.

Income Levels Among Black Households

In 2023, Black households had a median annual income of $54,000. Income levels varied among different Black demographic groups:

Multiracial Black households: Median income of $65,800
Black Hispanic households: Median income of $60,000
Single-race Black households: Median income of $52,800

The data highlights the economic diversity within the Black population, with significant variations based on racial and ethnic identity.

Conclusion

The U.S. Black population has grown substantially over the past two decades, both in size and diversity. This increase has been driven by multiple factors, including immigration and a broader societal shift in racial self-identification. The growth patterns across different states and metro areas highlight changing demographics, while trends in education, marriage, and income provide insight into the evolving social and economic landscape of Black Americans today.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/01/23/key-facts-about-black-americans/

Enviroment

Trump Declares End to Biden’s ‘Plastic Straw Mandate,’ Plans Executive Order to Reinstate Plastic Use

Former U.S. President Donald Trump took to Truth Social on Saturday, February 8, to announce the end of what he described as President Joe Biden’s “plastic straw mandate.” He celebrated the return of plastic straws while ridiculing paper alternatives.

In his post, Trump wrote, “Crooked Joe’s MANDATE, ‘NO PLASTIC STRAWS, ONLY PAPER,’ IS DEAD! Enjoy your next drink without a straw that disgustingly dissolves in your mouth!!!”

He further revealed his plan to sign an executive order the following week, reversing Biden’s push for paper straws and officially reinstating plastic.

Labeling the move “ridiculous,” Trump criticized the functionality of paper straws. Expressing his frustration in a post on X, he stated, “I will be signing an Executive Order next week ending the ridiculous Biden push for Paper Straws, which don’t work. Back to plastic!”

Exit from Paris Agreement

Trump’s announcement came shortly after he signed an executive order withdrawing the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement. This decision mirrored a move he made during his first term in office. The international accord, signed by nearly 200 countries, seeks to limit global warming, though it is not legally binding.

Health Experts Warn of Devastating Consequences as USAID Faces Funding Freeze

February 9, 2025February 10, 2025 Staff ReporterHealth 0

Global health experts have voiced strong concerns over the dismantling of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which provides tens of billions of dollars in overseas aid annually.

The Trump administration has announced drastic workforce reductions and an immediate suspension of nearly all USAID programs. A 90-day freeze on aid funding has been imposed as the government conducts a “review” to align projects with President Donald Trump’s policy priorities.

Trump has long criticized foreign aid spending, arguing that it must conform to his “America First” agenda. His administration has specifically targeted USAID, describing its spending as excessive and highlighting certain programs as examples of alleged waste of taxpayer money.

However, health experts have warned that these cuts could lead to the spread of diseases and significant delays in vaccine and treatment development.

In addition to directly managing numerous health programs, USAID funds other organizations to carry out health initiatives. The funding freeze has created uncertainty among these groups. While some humanitarian programs have received waivers, the announcement has already disrupted services.

Dr. Tom Wingfield, an expert in tuberculosis (TB) and social medicine at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, emphasized the severity of the situation in an interview with the BBC.

“People don’t appreciate the extent and reach of USAID. It goes towards under-nutrition, hygiene, toilets, access to clean water, which all have a massive impact on TB and diarrhoeal diseases,” he explained.

He also stressed that infectious diseases do not recognize borders, a concern that is exacerbated by climate change and large-scale migration.

“TB kills 1.3 million people per year and makes a further 10 million people ill. But four out of 10 people never receive any care and can therefore transmit the disease,” he said.

According to Dr. Wingfield, any disruption to research projects or clinical care increases the risk of disease transmission.

“Whether it’s a research project or a clinic affected, then we run risk of further transmission. People will die directly because of cuts in US funding,” he warned.

The funding freeze threatens not just TB treatment programs but also those assisting people with HIV. Many HIV care and prevention services are run by non-governmental organizations (NGOs), which rely on USAID funding to provide life-saving anti-retroviral medications. These drugs can suppress HIV to undetectable levels, reducing the risk of transmission.

Dr. Wingfield cautioned that treatment interruptions could be disastrous.

“People with controlled HIV, if they miss meds, the virus in their blood increases and there’s a risk of onwards transmission. There is a risk of undoing all the progress to date,” he said.

Catastrophic Impact on Health Services

Frontline AIDS, a UK and South Africa-based organization working with 60 partners in 100 countries, has reported widespread distress caused by the aid freeze. More than 20 of its partners have already been affected.

According to the organization, confusion over the freeze and subsequent waivers has led to serious operational challenges. Many partners have had to suspend HIV treatment, prevention, and care services for vulnerable populations. Staff layoffs have also been reported.

“The majority remain in limbo and this is having a catastrophic impact on communities and organisations,” said John Plastow, Executive Director of Frontline AIDS.

One of its partner organizations in Uganda is expected to run out of HIV testing kits, TB medications, and condoms within a month. These supplies are largely funded through USAID’s President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).

In South Africa, many HIV services have been halted. Some of these clinics provide aftercare and emergency contraception for women and girls who have been raped.

Beyond immediate service disruptions, the aid freeze has also shaken trust in US-backed programs.

Professor Peter Taylor, director of international development studies at Sussex University, warned that the abrupt cuts could have lasting consequences.

“Stopping things suddenly undermines people’s trust. People are bewildered and angry,” he said.

He argued that the damage extends beyond health services, affecting America’s standing in global development efforts.

“The undermining of basic trust is the real cost and that is being magnified in many situations around the world. This is so damaging to the US global reputation,” he added.

Research and Vaccine Development in Jeopardy

Experts are also worried about the future of international drug trials funded by USAID. Professor Thomas Jaki, who leads the MRC Biostatistics Unit at the University of Cambridge, fears that many ongoing and upcoming clinical trials may now be at risk.

“Unfortunately, there are quite a number of trials that are immediately affected by the USAID freeze—both in terms of running trials but also trials that are in set-up and are planned to start soon,” he said.

He expressed concern that the freeze would hinder medical advancements.

“I am convinced the US funding freeze will detrimentally impact treatment development, to an extent where exciting new treatments are delayed by years or even discarded,” he said.

The impact will be particularly severe in fields such as malaria and HIV, where USAID plays a major role in funding research.

Global Health at Risk

Professor Rosa Freedman, an expert in international law and global development at the University of Reading, pointed out that USAID provides up to 40% of the world’s development aid. This funding supports not only health initiatives but also education and economic development.

However, she warned that health programs would bear the brunt of a prolonged or permanent funding freeze.

“This will be partly due to the prevention of further vaccines being distributed or funded by USAID,” she said.

According to Prof. Freedman, diseases that were once under control could re-emerge if vaccine programs are disrupted.

“This could mean that preventable diseases, which we thought had been contained or even eradicated, could reappear or worsen, such as cholera and malaria,” she explained.

She also raised concerns about the wider global impact of the funding freeze.

“Given the globalized and interdependent nature of our planet, the concern will be that these diseases could spread quickly and far,” she said.

As the Trump administration moves forward with its aid review, the future of USAID remains uncertain. Experts warn that the consequences of these cuts could be felt for years, potentially reversing decades of progress in global health.

BJP Ends AAP’s Decade-Long Reign in Delhi, Kejriwal and Sisodia Defeated

February 8, 2025February 10, 2025 Staff ReporterIndia 0

After 27 years, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has staged a dramatic comeback in Delhi, unseating the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and ending its decade-long rule. The victory marks a sweeping reversal from the 2020 elections, when the BJP had managed only a single-digit tally.

The BJP secured 47 seats and led in one more, comfortably surpassing the majority mark of 36 in the 70-member Delhi Assembly. AAP, which had dominated the last two elections, won 22 seats, suffering a severe setback. Meanwhile, the Congress party failed to make any impact, recording a third consecutive election without winning a single seat.

Key Highlights of the Delhi Election Results

The BJP won with a 45.56% vote share, while AAP followed closely with 43.57%. Congress trailed far behind with just 6.34% of the votes, reflecting its continued decline in the capital’s political landscape.

The saffron party’s resurgence saw the defeat of several AAP heavyweights. In one of the biggest upsets, BJP’s Parvesh Verma defeated Arvind Kejriwal in the New Delhi constituency. Kejriwal, who had held the seat since 2013, lost by a margin of 4,089 votes after consistently trailing throughout the counting process.

Former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia faced a similar fate, losing to BJP’s Tarvinder Singh Marwah in Jangpura. After nine rounds of counting, Sisodia was behind by 572 votes. Accepting his defeat, he stated, “We fell short by 600 votes. Hope they [BJP] will focus on the progress and welfare of the people.”

However, AAP’s Atishi managed to secure a crucial win against BJP’s Ramesh Bidhuri in Kalkaji, while Health Minister Saurabh Bharadwaj lost to BJP’s Shikha Roy in Greater Kailash by 3,188 votes after initially leading.

Another significant loss for AAP came in Patparganj, where Manish Sisodia’s replacement, Avadh Ojha, conceded to BJP’s Ravinder Singh Negi by over 21,000 votes. Reflecting on his defeat, Ojha stated, “It’s my personal defeat. I couldn’t connect to people… I’ll meet the people and will contest the next election from here.”

As the BJP celebrated its landslide victory, Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed gratitude to the voters. “People’s power is supreme. They ensured that development and good governance won. We guarantee that we will leave no stone unturned to ensure the all-round development of Delhi and to make the lives of its people better,” he said.

Acknowledging the party’s defeat, Kejriwal released a video message accepting the public’s verdict. He assured supporters that AAP would regroup and serve as a responsible opposition. “We are not in politics for power, instead we consider it as a medium to serve people,” he said.

The elections, held on February 5, saw a voter turnout of 60.54%, which was about 2.5 percentage points lower than in 2020. Mustafabad recorded the highest voter turnout at 69.01%, while Mehrauli had the lowest at 53.02%.

Delhi voters weighed everyday concerns like water supply, drainage, and garbage management against high-profile campaign issues. The BJP successfully leveraged Kejriwal’s controversial bungalow renovation—dubbed “sheesh mahal”—along with corruption allegations to shift public sentiment. Meanwhile, AAP blamed governance challenges on interference from Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena, but this argument failed to gain traction.

BJP’s Resurgence and AAP’s Downfall

The BJP’s decisive victory has ended the AAP’s 12-year hold on Delhi politics, with several of its senior leaders suffering humiliating defeats. Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and Saurabh Bharadwaj, once at the forefront of an anti-corruption movement that unseated Congress, now find themselves on the receiving end of similar allegations.

Political analyst Rasheed Kidwai identified five key reasons for AAP’s electoral downfall:

Unfulfilled Promises: Arvind Kejriwal’s inability to deliver on key promises proved to be the biggest factor in AAP’s loss. “Arvind Kejriwal promised freebies to women voters, but legally, people knew he wouldn’t be able to fulfill them. His case was different from Mamata Banerjee, Hemant Soren, Omar Abdullah, or Siddharamiah,” Kidwai noted.

Shift in Middle-Class Support: The middle class, which previously supported AAP in assembly elections while voting for BJP in national polls, did not return this time. Kidwai explained, “This explains the nine percent drop in AAP voters, including chartered accountants, doctors, government servants, and businesspeople. Due to Kejriwal’s victimhood narrative, confrontational politics, and corruption allegations, they shifted to the BJP.”

Lack of an AAP-Congress Alliance: The absence of a coalition between AAP and Congress also played a role. In 65 constituencies, Congress candidates failed to make a significant impact, yet they still dented AAP’s vote share. “Two and two don’t add up to four in politics. Kejriwal’s margin of defeat and the votes received by Sandeep Dikshit tell the story,” Kidwai observed.

Civic Issues and Voter Perception: AAP’s victory in the 2022 Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) elections backfired, as governance issues such as broken roads, cleanliness, and inadequate water supply were attributed to the party. Delhi voters did not differentiate between the responsibilities of the MCD and the state government, leading to frustration with Kejriwal’s administration. “All these problems landed at Kejriwal’s doorstep,” Kidwai pointed out.

Corruption Allegations and “Sheesh Mahal”: The controversy surrounding Kejriwal’s expensive bungalow renovation severely damaged his image as a “common man” leader. “Kejriwal has reacted to allegations vigorously, but in the Sheesh Mahal case, he could not come clear. He should have thrown it open for the public,” Kidwai remarked.

The BJP’s victory in Delhi marks a significant political shift, reinforcing the party’s dominance at both the state and national levels. As AAP regroups, its leaders will have to reassess their strategy and address the concerns that led to their downfall. Meanwhile, the BJP will now be under pressure to deliver on its promises and maintain the confidence of Delhi’s electorate.

U.S. and India at a Crossroads: Can They Build a Stronger Future Together?

February 8, 2025February 9, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

The United States faces a critical decision—will it continue to lead in an evolving global economy, or will outdated policies drive away top talent? Nowhere is this challenge more pressing than in its partnership with India.

For years, Indian professionals have played a crucial role in driving U.S. innovation. Many have utilized the H-1B visa program, which allows American employers to hire “highly skilled” foreign workers on a temporary basis. Others have arrived as students, some returning to India after their studies, while others have settled permanently, contributing to the U.S. economy as citizens.

Currently, over 330,000 Indian students are enrolled in U.S. universities, and Indian professionals accounted for 72.3% of all H-1B visas issued in FY 2023. In the 2023-2024 academic year, India overtook China as the top source of international students in the U.S., reclaiming a position it last held in 2009, according to the latest Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange.

With Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi securing reelection in June 2024—albeit as the leader of a coalition—the stage is set for deeper U.S.-India relations. However, this comes amid internal U.S. debates over the H-1B visa program and the broader significance of immigration to American businesses.

Next week, Modi is scheduled to meet with Trump at the White House. As both countries emphasize economic self-reliance—through the “Made in the USA” and “Make in India” initiatives—the key issue is not whether they can coexist, but rather how they can collaborate for a stronger, interconnected future.

“This is such an important relationship, and it’s such a great opportunity for people-to-people, company-to-company, and government-to-government to make a difference in the world,” stated former U.S. Ambassador to India Eric Garcetti on the Heard in the Corridor Podcast, recorded at a Milken Institute summit in Abu Dhabi.

Rather than a competition, the U.S.-India relationship presents an advantage. Both nations lead in technology, education, and economic growth, and their partnership is essential for shaping the future. Garcetti described this collaboration as “an awakening” for Americans, recognizing India’s cultural and economic importance.

Kenneth I. Juster, Garcetti’s predecessor, echoed this sentiment in an interview with ABP Live, asserting that despite occasional “speed bumps” involving trade, tariffs, and immigration, Trump would ensure that U.S.-India relations remain “very strong.”

Can ‘Made in America’ and ‘Make in India’ Work Together?

With both countries prioritizing domestic economic growth, can the “Made in America” and “Make in India” strategies succeed in parallel? The answer lies in sound policy decisions, investment cooperation, and a mutual commitment to innovation that benefits both nations.

The potential rewards include more resilient supply chains, job creation, and access to expanding markets. India has significantly increased its foreign direct investment (FDI) in the United States, reflecting its growing economic stature. As the world’s fastest-growing major economy, with a population exceeding 1.4 billion, India is now the fifth-largest economy, boasting a GDP of $3.4 trillion. According to the U.S. State Department’s “2024 Investment Climate Statements: India” report, India is expected to surpass Japan and Germany by the early 2030s, securing its place as the world’s third-largest economy.

Indian companies investing in the U.S. are not merely expanding their business footprint; they are actively integrating into local communities. The reverse is also true, with American investments in India playing a similar role. This is not just about corporate social responsibility—it is about building lasting economic and strategic relationships.

However, if the U.S. fails to modernize its immigration and trade policies, top Indian talent that could otherwise contribute to the American economy may choose alternative destinations like Canada, Australia, or the United Kingdom.

Likewise, if India adopts overly protectionist policies, it may discourage crucial U.S. investments that drive innovation and economic expansion. Both countries have exhibited signs of protectionism under various administrations, particularly in sectors like manufacturing and technology. The bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, which aims to boost domestic U.S. semiconductor production, along with tighter restrictions on foreign investments, highlight America’s increasing economic nationalism. The challenge is to balance these policies to safeguard economic and national security while fostering a mutually beneficial partnership.

Strengthening the U.S.-India Relationship

To maintain and enhance their partnership, the U.S. and India must take decisive action. The United States must reform its immigration policies to attract and retain top talent, while also crafting investment-friendly policies that encourage cross-border collaboration. Simultaneously, India should continue welcoming foreign investment and fostering knowledge exchange.

Deepening people-to-people ties between the two nations is equally vital. The relationship is not just about government agreements—it thrives on strong connections between the people of both countries.

Garcetti emphasized this, stating, “We already have more Indian students in our higher education institutions than from any other country. This exchange enriches both nations, and we need more Americans to study in India to create a two-way knowledge flow.”

As China makes significant strides in artificial intelligence, the United States must recognize the importance of engaging with India to ensure it does not miss out on opportunities in one of the world’s fastest-growing innovation hubs.

Trump recently pointed to the rapid rise of the Chinese AI app DeepSeek as a “wake-up call” for American technology firms. Meanwhile, India is emerging as a global leader in AI, digital technology, and advanced manufacturing. If the U.S. fails to collaborate effectively, it risks losing a key ally in technological innovation.

“India is moving to the center stage of innovation—where design, engineering, and cutting-edge technology are taking over,” Garcetti remarked. “It’s a testbed for AI applications across industries and languages.”

The Role of Investment and Collaboration

Foreign direct investment between the two nations is no longer a one-way flow. Indian companies are making a tangible impact on the U.S. economy. A prime example is JSW Steel’s investment in Texas, aimed at enhancing steel production and creating jobs.

Garcetti highlighted this, noting, “JSW’s investment is a prime example of how cross-border collaboration works for everyone—strengthening economies while advancing clean energy goals.”

The U.S.-India partnership is about more than trade. It represents a shared vision for the future, built on common values and global leadership.

“If you want your life or your business to be about something consequential, come to India,” Garcetti said. “If you want it to be compelling, come to India. And if you want to navigate the challenges of today’s world, the U.S.-India partnership is the place to start.”

Two decades ago, the devastating 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami, which claimed over 200,000 lives, prompted a new era of international cooperation. The “Quad”—comprising the United States, India, Australia, and Japan—was formed in response, showcasing the strength of diplomatic and strategic alliances. However, like any partnership, its success hinges on the commitment of its members.

For Trump, Modi, and the citizens of both nations, the opportunity at hand is immense.

Now is the time for decisive action. The United States and India must reinforce their partnership through investment, policy reforms, and technological cooperation. The future will not be shaped by those who withdraw, but by those who seize the opportunity to innovate together.

Trump Announces White House Faith Office and Task Force to Combat Anti-Christian Bias

February 8, 2025February 9, 2025 Staff ReporterReligion 0

U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Thursday the creation of a White House faith office and appointed Attorney General Pam Bondi to lead a newly formed task force dedicated to eliminating what he described as anti-Christian bias within the federal government.

Speaking at the National Prayer Breakfast at the U.S. Capitol, Trump called for “unity” and reflected on how his perspective on religion had “changed” after surviving two assassination attempts last year. However, during a second prayer breakfast in Washington, his remarks took on a more partisan tone as he celebrated recent political victories and announced measures aimed at protecting Christians from what he characterized as religious discrimination.

“The mission of this task force will be to immediately halt all forms of anti-Christian targeting and discrimination within the federal government, including at the DOJ, which was absolutely terrible, the IRS, the FBI, and other agencies,” Trump stated.

He further pledged that his attorney general would take decisive action to “fully prosecute anti-Christian violence and vandalism in our society and to move heaven and earth to defend the rights of Christians and religious believers nationwide.”

Although Trump did not provide specific examples of anti-Christian bias during his speech, he has previously accused the Biden administration of using federal institutions to target Christians.

On the same day, Trump signed an executive order formally establishing the task force. Its responsibilities include evaluating policies and recommending measures to eliminate “violative policies, practices, or conduct” perceived as discriminatory against Christians.

This initiative follows the Biden administration’s efforts to counter religious discrimination in other communities. In December, Biden’s administration introduced a strategy to combat anti-Muslim and anti-Arab bigotry, following a similar plan in September 2023 aimed at addressing antisemitism.

Trump’s announcement raises potential constitutional concerns regarding the separation of church and state. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution limits government involvement in promoting specific religions, and critics may question whether these new initiatives align with constitutional principles.

Since surviving an assassination attempt last year, Trump has increasingly framed his political journey in religious terms, positioning himself as a leader divinely spared for a purpose. “Many people have told me that God spared my life for a reason,” he has repeated at various campaign events across the country.

Trump continues to hold strong support among White evangelical Christian voters, a key Republican voting bloc. In recent election cycles, this group has consistently backed him due to his alignment with conservative Christian values and policies that reflect their concerns about shifting gender norms and changing family structures.

During his speech, Trump also announced the creation of a White House Faith Office, to be led by Rev. Paula White, a longtime religious adviser. This move mirrors an initiative from his first term when he established a similar office and maintained close relationships with a group of evangelical advisors.

In addition, Trump declared plans to establish a new commission on religious liberty and criticized the Biden administration for what he described as the “persecution” of religious believers through its prosecution of anti-abortion activists.

“If we don’t have religious liberty, then we don’t have a free country,” Trump emphasized.

The structure of the National Prayer Breakfast changed in 2023, splitting into two separate events. Lawmakers attended an official gathering on Capitol Hill, while a separate private event was held in a hotel ballroom for a larger audience. This shift came after concerns arose over the management and funding of the private religious group previously associated with the event.

FIA’s 41st Dance Pe Chance Draws Record Crowd with 800+ Performers

February 8, 2025February 9, 2025 Staff ReporterCommunity 0

The Federation of Indian Associations (FIA) NY-NJ-CT-NE hosted its largest-ever ‘Dance Pe Chance’ (DPC) competition on February 1, 2025, marking a record-breaking turnout.

This highly anticipated annual event took place at the Patriots Theater in the War Memorial, Trenton, NJ. Due to an overwhelming response, the event saw over 800 participants, significantly surpassing previous years. With an extended program, the event drew more than 2,000 spectators who gathered to witness an evening of vibrant and energetic performances.

A total of 33 choreographed dance performances were presented, featuring participants aged between 6 and 60 from 15 different dance academies across four states.

The event showcased a Broadway-style dance production, enhanced by a massive LED backdrop, advanced lighting, and elaborate costumes, which helped bring Indian cultural storytelling to life through the medium of dance.

A significant highlight of the evening was the presence of India’s Consul General in New York, Binaya S. Pradhan, who conducted the oath of office ceremony for FIA’s newly elected Executive Committee. He also made key announcements, including the opening of a new Indian Consulate in Boston, MA, a satellite office in New Jersey, and the Consulate’s transition to year-round operations.

FIA Chairman Ankur Vaidya underscored the volunteer-driven nature of Dance Pe Chance, which is made possible through the efforts of over 100 dedicated volunteers. He extended his gratitude to the choreographers, performers, parents, sponsors, and the War Memorial Theatre for their contributions.

Padma Shri awardee Dr. Sudhir Parikh, advisor to FIA and chairman of Parikh Worldwide Media, took to Twitter to share his enthusiasm, stating, “What an incredible evening at the 41st Dance Pe Chance! I am honored to witness this spectacular showcase of Indian culture alongside Consul General Binaya Srikanta Pradhan & FIA leadership. With 800+ young performers & a packed venue, the energy was truly electrifying.” He further praised the event’s success by adding, “Kudos to all participants and organizers for a record-breaking event!”

The judging panel featured notable figures from the dance world, including dancer and actor Salman Yusuff Khan, Indian dancer Josephine Madhuri Verghese, Mamta Patel, founder of Nupoor Art Academy, and Miral Shah, Creative Director of Yuva Dance Academy.

FIA President Saurin Parikh emphasized the event’s core mission, which is to engage young members of the Indian diaspora while celebrating and promoting Indian culture and heritage.

Dance Pe Chance Chair Priti Ray Patel also commended the event’s role in fostering unity among diverse communities through the performing arts.

The FIA committee in attendance included FIA Convenor 2025 Sreekanth Akkapalli, CEO of TV9 North America, as well as FIA Grand Gala Chair Manan Saxena. The event was hosted by Mamta Narula and Nishil Parikh, who served as emcees.

The organizers credited numerous sponsors and supporters for the event’s success, including CGI-NY, Parikh Worldwide Media/ITV Gold, ONYX Edge, and several other media organizations.

The 41st edition of FIA’s Dance Pe Chance concluded with awards presented across multiple categories, honoring the dedication and artistic talent of the participants. The event underscored its mission of strengthening community bonds through cultural expression.

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order, Calls It Unconstitutional

February 7, 2025February 8, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

A second federal judge has indefinitely blocked former President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at restricting birthright citizenship, issuing a strong rebuke of the administration’s attempt to impose such a policy during a court hearing on Thursday.

“It has become ever more apparent that, to our president, the rule of law is but an impediment to his policy goals. The rule of law is, according to him, something to navigate around or simply ignore, whether that be for political or personal gain,” stated U.S. District Judge John Coughenour while delivering his ruling.

Coughenour, who was appointed by former President Ronald Reagan, emphasized his commitment to upholding the legal framework. “Nevertheless, in this courtroom and under my watch, the rule of law is a bright beacon which I intend to follow,” he asserted.

Previously, the judge had issued a temporary halt on Trump’s executive order, but that ruling was set to expire on Thursday after two weeks. This time, he granted a nationwide preliminary injunction, effectively blocking the executive order as requested by four Democratic state attorneys general and a group of private plaintiffs.

Coughenour made his decision after hearing arguments for less than 20 minutes. He referenced his past work in the former Soviet Union to underscore the importance of maintaining judicial independence and legal integrity.

“I said this two weeks ago, and I’ll say it again today: There are moments in the world’s history when people look back and ask, ‘Where were the lawyers, where were the judges?’ In these moments, the rule of law becomes especially vulnerable. I refuse to let that beacon go dark today,” he remarked.

The executive order, signed by Trump on his first day in office, sought to limit birthright citizenship so that it would not apply to children born in the U.S. to parents who lacked permanent legal status. The order was among several immigration-related measures introduced in the administration’s early weeks.

Trump’s policy has already been challenged in nine separate lawsuits, with critics arguing that it contradicts long-standing Supreme Court interpretations of the 14th Amendment’s birthright citizenship guarantee, which has been understood to allow only a few exceptions.

“This case turns on the critical phrase ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ in the Citizenship Clause. On that issue, plaintiffs offer a construction of that phrase that is demonstrably and unequivocally incorrect,” contended Drew Ensign, a deputy assistant attorney general, during Thursday’s hearing.

Coughenour’s decision follows a similar ruling by a federal judge in Maryland on Wednesday, who also issued an injunction against the executive order. Additional hearings related to the issue are scheduled to take place in Boston on Friday and Concord, New Hampshire, on Monday as other lawsuits proceed.

The rulings issued this week will remain in effect indefinitely, preventing the enforcement of Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship until the cases are fully litigated.

However, Coughenour left little doubt regarding his perspective on the legality of the policy.

“The Constitution is not something with which the government may play policy games. If the government wants to change the exceptional American grant of birthright citizenship, it needs to amend the Constitution itself,” he declared.

“That’s how our Constitution works, and that’s how the rule of law works. Because the president’s order attempts to circumscribe this process, it is clearly unconstitutional,” he concluded.

Trump Orders Review and Funding Cuts for Key UN Organizations

February 7, 2025February 8, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

President Donald Trump has issued an Executive Order directing increased scrutiny of three United Nations entities: the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), and the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

The order formally confirms the United States’ withdrawal from the UNHRC and suspends all future financial contributions to UNRWA. Additionally, it calls for an expedited review of UNESCO to examine whether the organization has demonstrated “anti-Israel bias.”

Under the directive, Secretary of State Marco Rubio must also assess and report on “international organizations, conventions, or treaties” that may foster radical ideologies or sentiments deemed “anti-American.”

Raising concerns about UNRWA’s alleged affiliations with terrorist activities, the order claims the agency has engaged in “anti-Semitic and anti-Israel” actions. It refers to reports that certain UNRWA personnel were involved in the October 7th attacks against Israel and highlights the use of the agency’s facilities by Hamas and other militant groups for stockpiling weapons and constructing tunnels.

“UNRWA has reportedly been infiltrated by members of groups long designated by the Secretary of State (Secretary) as foreign terrorist organizations, and UNRWA employees were involved in the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel,” the order states. It further criticizes the UNHRC for providing cover to human rights violators and accuses UNESCO of displaying a persistent anti-Israel stance over the past decade.

The order instructs the Secretary of State to formally inform the UN Secretary-General, as well as the leadership of UNRWA and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, that the U.S. will no longer contribute funds to UNRWA or the UNHRC. Additionally, it declares that the United States will not “satisfy any claims to pay 2025 assessments or prior arrears by these organizations.”

Furthermore, the directive specifies that the U.S. will not take part in the UNHRC’s activities or seek a seat on the Council. The Secretary of State has been tasked with shutting down the Office of the U.S. Representative to the UNHRC and eliminating all associated positions.

Regarding UNESCO, the order mandates a comprehensive review of U.S. membership, which must be completed within 90 days. This assessment will be led by the Secretary of State in coordination with the U.S. Ambassador to the UN.

Modi to Visit US, Meet Trump Amid Trade and Immigration Discussions

February 6, 2025February 8, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to visit the United States next week for a meeting with President Donald Trump, according to a statement from the White House.

Reports indicate that Modi will also attend a dinner hosted by the US president during his two-day visit. However, the exact dates of the official working visit have not yet been disclosed.

The Indian leader will be one of the first foreign dignitaries to meet Trump at the White House following the start of his second term. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is currently in Washington, while Japan’s Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is expected to arrive later this week.

During Trump’s first term, he and Modi shared a strong rapport. Last week, the two leaders engaged in what the White House described as a “productive” phone conversation, discussing issues such as illegal immigration, security, and trade relations.

Analysts believe it will be crucial to see whether this cordial relationship can help resolve concerns regarding trade disputes and immigration policies.

Trump, who has praised Modi as a “great leader,” has also criticized India over its trade practices, particularly its tariffs. Last year, he accused India of imposing excessive tariffs on US goods.

The confirmation of Modi’s visit to Washington comes shortly after a US military flight carrying around 100 deported Indian nationals landed in Punjab.

Reports suggest that those deported had either entered the US illegally or overstayed their visas.

During their phone conversation last week, Trump expressed confidence that India “will do the right thing” regarding illegal immigration.

Deportation of undocumented foreign nationals has been a central aspect of Trump’s policy. According to a Bloomberg report, 18,000 undocumented Indian migrants have been identified in the US, though experts believe the actual number may be higher.

A study by the Pew Research Center estimated that the number of undocumented Indian immigrants in the US stood at approximately 725,000 last year.

Thus far, India has managed to avoid facing direct US tariffs on its exports.

However, Trump has previously described India as the “tariff king” and a “big abuser” of trade relations. He has warned of reciprocal actions if India does not lower its taxes on American imports.

In an attempt to ease tensions, India’s latest budget included reductions in duties on various products, including high-end motorcycles like Harley-Davidson.

India’s finance secretary emphasized that this decision demonstrated the country was “not a tariff king.”

Last week, the Indian foreign ministry affirmed that efforts were underway to strengthen bilateral ties between the two nations.

India’s Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar represented the country at Trump’s inauguration ceremony and held discussions with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio while visiting Washington.

Following Trump’s re-election victory in November, Jaishankar stated that India had no concerns about collaborating with the US administration.

Chandrika Tandon Wins 2025 Grammy for Best New Age Album

February 6, 2025February 7, 2025 Staff ReporterWomen 0

South Asian American singer, songwriter, and producer Chandrika Tandon has secured the 2025 Grammy Award for her album Triveni in the category of Best New Age, Ambient, or Chant Album. This achievement marks her first Grammy win and her second nomination, further solidifying her presence in the realm of spiritual and healing music.

A pioneering collaboration, Triveni unites Tandon with Grammy-winning South African flutist Wouter Kellerman and Japanese American cellist Eru Matsumoto. The album offers a deeply meditative experience by merging ancient mantras with the calming melodies of flute and cello, effectively bridging different musical cultures and traditions. Reflecting on the power of music, Tandon shared upon receiving the award, “Music is love, music ignites the light within all of us, and, even in our darkest days, music spreads joy and laughter.” She also extended her appreciation to her fellow nominees, adding, “Congratulations to all the other nominees in our category. Thank you for the music, and thank you for each and everyone that creates and supports the music; may all our lives be enveloped in love, light, and laughter.”

For years, Tandon has been integrating Sanskrit chants with Western musical elements, particularly for large choral groups. Her compositions have gained prominence, with performances at distinguished venues such as the World Cultural Festival and Lincoln Center. Additionally, she serves as an Artist in Residence for the Young People’s Chorus of New York City and has been awarded a New York State Council on the Arts grant to compose Sanskrit chant pieces for choral ensembles.

Beyond her musical accomplishments, Tandon is also widely recognized as a philanthropist, business leader, and humanitarian. Her efforts are aimed at enhancing human happiness through both music and education. She has released six albums through her Soul Chants Music label and has performed at prestigious locations, including the Kennedy Center, Lincoln Center, Times Square, and Washington, D.C.’s National Mall.

Tandon has also made significant strides in the corporate world. She became the first South Asian American woman to be elected partner at McKinsey & Company and later founded Tandon Capital Associates. In addition, she chairs the Krishnamurthy Tandon Foundation, which supports various philanthropic endeavors. She is a trustee of New York University and chairs the NYU Tandon School of Engineering, contributing extensively to business and community education initiatives.

Her achievements have earned her numerous accolades, including the Ellis Island Medal of Honor, NYU’s Gallatin Medal, and The Town Hall’s Friend of the Arts Award. These honors highlight her enduring impact as both an artist and a leader dedicated to fostering education and culture through her work.

About Chandrika Tandon

Chandrika Tandon is an acclaimed musician, business executive, and philanthropist devoted to the transformative power of music and education. Through her label, Soul Chants Music, she creates music rooted in ancient traditions that resonate with audiences worldwide. Her work extends across music, business, and philanthropy, inspiring people globally.

New GOPIO International Leadership Sworn in with Community Leader Prakash Shah as the New President

February 6, 2025February 7, 2025 Dr. Thomas AbrahamCommunity 0

Global Organization of People of Indian Origin (GOPIO) conducted its election last month and the new team was sworn in on January 31st at a virtual Zoom ceremony with veteran community leader from New Jersey Mr. Prakash Shah as its president. Prakash Shah, former Chairman of New Jersey Development Authority, has been a Founder Life member from GOPIO inception in 1989 and was serving as the Global Ambassador and later as the Convener of the GOPIO Convention 2024 in New Jersey in his last term. Others sworn in at the ceremony are media and community leader Mr. Umesh Chandra from Brisbane, Australia as Executive Vice President; Los Angeles area community leader Kewal Kanda as Vice President, and former IBM official and New York Social Activist Ms. Jasbir “Nami” Kaur as Global Ambassador. Also elected were International Coordinators for Africa Mr. Ishwar Ramlatchman and for South Asia Mr. Dhiraj Ahuja,

The election was conducted according to the GOPIO bylaws by a four-member committee appointed by the GOPIO Executive Council. It was headed by Mr. Mridul Pathak along with Mr. Dinesh Mittal, Mr. Manohar Dev and Mr. Prashant Gupta providing technical support and was under the supervision of GOPIO Chairman Dr. Thomas Abraham. The election was conducted for the position Vice President using eballot.com platform. All other positions were elected unanimously.

unnamed — Photo – GOPIO Officials who were sworn-in. From l. to r. Prakash Shah, Umesh Chandra, Kewal Kanda, J. Nami Kaur, Ishwar Ramlutchman and Dhiraj Ahuja

Since the officers come from the different continents of the world, the oath ceremony was conducted virtually and started with a universal prayer by Ms. Devika Gadhavi, who is a young professional working in New York City. Dr. Thomas Abraham, Chairman of GOPIO International welcomed the participants from all continents and provided a brief introduction to the birth of GOPIO and many of its achievements in the last 36 years.

“GOPIO chapters around the world have been doing a lot of organizational groundwork in many countries to promote leadership in public service and the thrust has been to promote and involve the Indian Diaspora in the larger society and local communities wherever they live,” said Dr. Abraham.

Outgoing president Lal Motwani spoke on the activities done during his term and thanked his team members. Dr. Abraham then administered the Oath of Office.

In his acceptance speech, President Prakash Shah said, “It is my ambition to try and activate those regions and Chapters which are not active now so that GOPIO does become a functioning Network for the 38 million strong India Diaspora, We need many Young Leaders to get involved in the GOPIO to take GOPIO to a New Level. We will officially relaunch GOPIO Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI) in different parts of the world. We are having our next Convention in Brisbane, Australia March 28-30 2025 under the leadership of Umesh Chandra.

After the Oath ceremony, all elected officials spoke briefly on their plans for GOPIO. Many GOPIO chapter presidents and other community leaders made remarks complimenting the new officials.

Newly Sworn-in GOPIO Officials

President – Prakash Shah, Somerset, New Jersey, USA

Prakash Shah has been involved in Founding a number of Leading Community Organizations including Global Organization for the People of Indian Origin (GOPIO), Asian American Hotel Owners Association (AAHOA), National Federation of Indian American Associations (NFIA) and the NYC based India Chamber of Commerce of America (ICCA). He was a Presidential Appointee under President Clinton to the Southern Africa Fund and was Chairman of New Jersey Development Authority under Governors Florio and Whitman.

Executive Vice President – Umesh Chandra, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Umesh Chandra is highly respected nationally and internationally. He was awarded OAM -the highest civilian honour in Australia, in 2020. He is a founder member and board of trustee of the Queensland Multicultural Council and serves on the police ethnic advisory group and Lord Mayors Multicultural round table. He has been the founder and president of GOPIO Qld and serves as a Trustees of GOPIO Queensland. He is the chair of the White Ribbon Queensland State Committee and has been a long-standing ambassador for White Ribbon. He has won many community service awards, including the Bharat Gaurav award in 2011. Umesh and Usha Chandra were named Brisbane City Councils’ citizen of the year in 2019 and own Globenet Realty.

Vice President – Kewal Kanda

Kewal Kanda retired from Boeing Company after 26 years of service as production planner, principal analyst and planning manager. Community service being his passion he is a member of many non-profit community organizations such as Founder of Rajput Association of America (1984), Founder president of GOPIO-LA Chapter, Treasurer of GOPIO International, and President FIA-SC, He organized RPBD in Los Angeles as NFIA RVP-Pacific South West core member, and four programs as chairman of committee to celebrate 75 years of India’s Independence as Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav, including publishing a its commemorative Coffee Table Book.

Global Ambassador – Nami Kaur, Yonkers, New York, USA

J. Nami Kaur successfully completed her 32-year Corporate professional career in Technology, Marketing and Communications at IBM. Since 2009, she has had been actively engaged in the Non-Profit Sector, donating her time and skills pro-bono to New York Botanical Garden, Children’s Hope India, Riveredge Cooperative Board, and GOPIO (Global Organization of People of Indian Origin). She has served GOPIO as a volunteer since its inception in 1989. Since 2009 she has served formally as the Media Council Chair, General Secretary, Chair of GOPIO Election, and Editor of GOPIO Newsletter.

International Coordinator for Africa – Ishwar Ramlutchman, Durban, South Africa

Philanthropist and Humanitarian Prince Ishwar Ramlutchman (Mabheka Zulu) has received many awards. He is the first person of Indian Origin to foster relations with the Largest African Tribe and become part of Zulu Royal Family. He is a former Executive VP of GOPIO International and the President and Founder of the Sivananda World Peace Foundation . He has Supported the Indian diaspora in many of His cultural, peace initiatives and heritage programs. He upholds corporate social responsibility by building schools, feeding and providing health facilities for the poor and disadvantaged in South Africa.

International Coordinator for South Asia – Dhiraj Ahuja, New Delhi, India

A self-made businessman, Dhiraj Ahuja has an international network throughout globe and is a member of Indian Press Club. He has been working effectively as President of GOPIO-Delhi/NCR Chapter. Dhiraj is associated with a few prominent NGOs as well as business houses.

Formed in 1989, GOPIO is a non-partisan, not-for-profit, secular organization with Individual Life Members and over 100 chapters in 35 countries. GOPIO’s volunteers are committed to enhancing cooperation and communication between NRIs/PIOs and the local communities, building networks, bonds, friendships, alliances, and the camaraderie of citizens and colleagues alike. GOPIO volunteers believe that when they help network the global Indian community, they facilitate making tomorrow a better world for the Indian Diaspora and the countries they live in.

Trump Proposes U.S. Ownership of Gaza in Meeting with Netanyahu

February 5, 2025February 8, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

President Donald Trump met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Tuesday, where he proposed that the United States take control of the Gaza Strip and redevelop the war-torn territory.

During a press conference following their meeting, Trump suggested that the U.S. could relocate approximately 1.8 million Palestinians and completely rebuild the Gaza Strip. He envisioned transforming it into the “Riviera of the Middle East” under American administration.

“We’ll own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site,” Trump stated while Netanyahu observed. “Level the site, and get rid of the destroyed buildings. Level it out, create an economic development.”

Netanyahu was the first foreign leader to visit Trump since he took office last month. Trump underscored their close alliance, describing the relationship between their countries as “unbreakable.”

Trump’s remarks align with his previous calls for neighboring countries to absorb Palestinians displaced by the war between Israel and Hamas. He has specifically pointed to Egypt and Jordan as potential hosts, though both countries have firmly rejected the idea. However, Trump expressed confidence that they would ultimately comply.

Trump did not specify how the U.S. might assume control of Gaza but did not rule out deploying American troops to assist in reconstruction efforts. He also announced plans to visit Israel and Gaza.

When Netanyahu took the podium, he commended Trump’s dedication to Israel. Addressing Trump’s idea for Gaza, Netanyahu remarked, “I think it’s something that could change history. And I think it’s worthwhile really pursuing.”

The meeting occurred as Israel and Hamas continue negotiations over the second phase of a ceasefire agreement. The first phase centered on the release of Israeli hostages and Palestinian detainees.

Trump administration officials stressed the importance of fully implementing Phase 1 to ensure the safe return of all hostages, including those who have died. They explained that Phase 2 would aim to conclude the war and secure the release of all remaining Israeli captives in Gaza.

However, Trump’s envoy cautioned that Phase 3—rebuilding Gaza—would present significant challenges. He described the idea of reconstruction within five years as “physically impossible,” estimating that it would require a timeline of 10 to 15 years due to the extensive devastation caused by the conflict.

Trump also expressed skepticism about the durability of the ceasefire.

“I have no guarantees that the peace is going to hold,” he admitted to reporters in the Oval Office on Monday.

When questioned about his vision for a U.S.-led Gaza redevelopment, Trump responded, “I envision the world people living there. The world’s people. I think you’ll make that into an international, unbelievable place.”

He also acknowledged that Palestinians would continue to inhabit the territory.

“You have to learn from history. History is – you just can’t let it keep repeating itself. We have an opportunity to do something that could be phenomenal,” Trump stated.

As part of his broader Middle East strategy, Trump signed two executive orders on Tuesday. The first order intensified pressure on Iran, a decision he admitted was difficult.

“I’m signing this and I’m unhappy to do it, but I have not so much choice because we have to be strong and firm,” he said, emphasizing his hope that the measure would not have to be enforced.

“To me, it’s very simple. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon,” Trump added, asserting the U.S. authority to block the sale of Iranian oil to other nations.

The second order withdrew the U.S. from the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and terminated funding for the United Nations Relief Works Agency (UNRWA), which primarily assists Palestinian refugees.

Both Democrats and Republicans have criticized the UNHRC, accusing it of bias against Israel.

Additionally, the order included a consideration to withdraw from UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Trump Proposes US Takeover of Gaza, Netanyahu Calls Him Israel’s ‘Greatest Friend’

February 5, 2025February 6, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held a joint press conference late Tuesday following their meeting at the White House, during which Trump proposed that the United States “take over” the Gaza Strip while discussing a potential truce with Hamas.

Netanyahu praised Trump, referring to him as “the greatest friend Israel has ever had.”

Key highlights from the press conference include Trump’s suggestion that the US would assume control of Gaza, his vision for its redevelopment, and Netanyahu’s emphasis on Israel’s objectives in the ongoing conflict.

Trump stated that the United States would “take over” and “own” the Gaza Strip. “The US will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a job with it, too. We’ll own it,” he said.

He did not dismiss the possibility of deploying US troops to Gaza, saying, “As far as Gaza is concerned, we’ll do what is necessary. If it’s necessary, we’ll do that.”

Trump outlined plans for clearing unexploded ordnance, demolishing damaged structures, and developing infrastructure to generate jobs and housing.

He also reiterated his belief that Palestinians should relocate to other Middle Eastern countries, such as Egypt and Jordan, despite both nations and Palestinian leaders rejecting this notion.

“It (Gaza Strip) should not go through a process of rebuilding and occupation by the same people that have really stood there and fought for it and lived there and died there and lived a miserable existence there,” Trump said.

He added that the two million people in Gaza should “go to other countries of interest with humanitarian hearts.”

Trump further elaborated that he viewed US control over Gaza as a long-term strategy, emphasizing that Palestinians should move elsewhere. “This is not a decision made lightly,” he said. He claimed widespread approval for the idea, stating, “Everybody I’ve spoken to loves the idea of the United States owning that piece of land.”

He also suggested that Gaza could be transformed into a prime destination. “The Riviera of the Middle East. This could be something that could be so magnificent,” he said, envisioning Gaza as an international attraction open to people from around the world, including Palestinians.

Netanyahu commended Trump and his proposals, calling him “the greatest friend Israel has ever had” and indicating that Trump’s plan could “change history” and warranted serious consideration.

“I’ve said this before, I’ll say it again: you are the greatest friend Israel has ever had in the White House,” Netanyahu remarked. “And that’s why the people of Israel have such enormous respect for you.”

Netanyahu also emphasized that Israel’s mission in Gaza remains unfinished, urging Trump to support efforts to secure Israel’s future. He listed three main objectives: eliminating Hamas, ensuring the release of hostages, and preventing Gaza from posing further threats to Israel.

He expressed confidence that Trump’s “willingness to puncture conventional thinking” would help achieve these goals.

“Israel will end the war by winning the war. Israel’s victory will be America’s victory,” Netanyahu declared.

Forbes 2025 List of the World’s Most Powerful Countries: India Absent from Top 10

February 5, 2025February 6, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

Forbes has unveiled its 2025 list of the world’s ten most powerful countries, with the United States securing the top position, followed by China in second place. Israel rounds out the list at the tenth spot. The rankings, based on multiple key factors, have ignited discussions due to the absence of India, despite its significant global standing as the country with the largest population, the fourth-largest military, and the fifth-largest economy.

Forbes clarified that the rankings were compiled by US News, with the methodology centered around five essential parameters: leadership, economic influence, political power, strong international alliances, and military strength.

The ranking system was devised by BAV Group, a division of the global marketing firm WPP, in collaboration with researchers from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, led by Professor David Reibstein. The research was conducted in association with US News & World Report.

As of February 2025, India holds the 12th position in the global power rankings. This placement considers India’s growing economic strength, key international alliances, and military capabilities. In terms of global GDP, India is ranked fifth, following the United States, China, Germany, and Japan.

Top 10 powerful countries in the world 2025

S.No	Country	GDP	Population	Region
1.	United States	$30.34 trillion	34.5 crore	North America
2.	China	$19.53 trillion	141.9 crore	Asia
3.	Russia	$2.2 trillion	144.4 crore	Asia
4.	United Kingdom	$3.73 trillion	6.91 crore	Europe
5.	Germany	$4.92 trillion	8.45 crore	Europe
6.	South Korea	$1.95 trillion	5.17 crore	Asia
7.	France	$3.28 trillion	6.65 crore	Europe
8.	Japan	$4.39 trillion	12.37 crore	Asia
9.	Saudi Arabia	$1.14 trillion	3.39 crore	Asia
10.	Israel	$550.91 billion	93.8 lakh	Asia

Bill Gates Reflects on Philanthropy, Childhood, and Success in New Memoir

February 4, 2025February 6, 2025 Staff ReporterBusiness 0

Toward the end of our conversation, Bill Gates shares new figures regarding his charitable giving, revealing just how much the Gates Foundation has spent on combating preventable diseases and alleviating poverty.

“I’ve given over 100 billion,” he states. “But I still have more to give.”

To clarify, that’s in dollars, which amounts to roughly £80 billion. This sum is comparable to the entire economy of Bulgaria or the cost of constructing the HS2 rail line. However, to put it into perspective, it is also approximately equivalent to just a single year of Tesla’s sales. Tesla’s owner, Elon Musk, is currently the wealthiest person on Earth, a title Gates himself held for many years.

As a co-founder of Microsoft, Gates has joined forces with fellow billionaire Warren Buffett to direct their wealth through the Gates Foundation, originally established with his now ex-wife, Melinda. He attributes his dedication to philanthropy to his upbringing, noting that his mother consistently reminded him that “with wealth came the responsibility to give it away.”

The Foundation is approaching its 25th anniversary in May, and Gates exclusively discloses to the BBC that his contributions have reached the $100 billion milestone. He explains that he genuinely enjoys giving away his fortune, with approximately $60 billion of it already allocated to the Foundation.

Despite this immense generosity, he acknowledges that his lifestyle remains unchanged. “I made no personal sacrifice. I didn’t order less hamburgers or less movies,” he remarks. Of course, he can still afford luxuries such as a private jet and multiple grand estates.

He reiterates his commitment to donating “the vast majority” of his wealth but acknowledges extensive discussions with his three children regarding the appropriate amount to leave them.

When asked whether his children will struggle financially after his passing, he responds with a smile, “They will not.” He elaborates, “In absolute, they’ll do well, in percentage terms it’s not a gigantic number.”

Gates’ mathematical acumen is evident throughout our conversation. As a student at Seattle’s Lakeside School, he excelled in mathematics, ranking among the top high school competitors in a four-state regional exam by the age of 13. Mathematical terminology is second nature to him. But to put his wealth into context, if he is indeed worth $160 billion, as Bloomberg’s Billionaires Index suggests, even a small fraction of that inheritance would still leave his children extremely wealthy.

Currently, Gates is one of just 15 individuals globally classified as centibillionaires—those whose net worth exceeds $100 billion—according to Bloomberg. Our interview takes place in his childhood home in Seattle, a mid-century modern four-bedroom house nestled into a hill. We are meeting to discuss his memoir, Source Code: My Beginnings, which delves into his formative years.

I am eager to explore what transformed an unconventional, obsessive child into a technological trailblazer. Accompanied by his sisters, Kristi and Libby, Gates excitedly tours the home where they spent their youth. They have not visited in years, and though the current owners have renovated it, the Gates siblings seem to approve of the changes.

As they enter the kitchen, childhood memories resurface—particularly of their late mother, who used the now-removed intercom system to sing to them in the mornings to summon them to breakfast.

Mary Gates also had an unusual habit of setting all the household clocks and watches eight minutes fast to ensure the family operated on her schedule. Though Gates often resisted his mother’s efforts to refine him, he now acknowledges, “The crucible of my ambition was warmed through that relationship.”

He attributes his competitive nature to his grandmother, “Gami,” who frequently stayed with them in this house and taught him to outwit opponents through card games.

Descending the wooden stairs, Gates locates his childhood bedroom in the basement. The space has since been converted into a guest room, but as a child, he spent countless hours there, often lost in thought.

His sisters recall how their mother, frustrated by his untidiness, once confiscated every piece of clothing left on the floor and charged him 25 cents per item to retrieve them. Gates, true to his pragmatic nature, adapted quickly: “I started wearing fewer clothes,” he says.

By then, he was already obsessed with coding. Along with a few tech-savvy school friends, he gained access to a local firm’s lone computer in exchange for reporting system issues. In the early days of the tech revolution, he was so engrossed in programming that he would sneak out at night through his bedroom window for extra computer time—without his parents’ knowledge.

Curious, I ask whether he could still do it today. He promptly unlocks the latch and opens the window. “It’s not that hard,” he grins, climbing up and out. “It’s not hard at all.”

Gates has long been known for his physical agility. In a famous early TV appearance, a presenter once asked if he could jump over a chair from a standing position—he did so effortlessly in the studio. Now, nearly 70 years old, standing in his childhood bedroom, he still appears eager to prove himself.

Beyond revisiting his youth, Gates makes a striking revelation in his memoir: he believes that if he were growing up today, he would likely be diagnosed as being on the autism spectrum.

The only other time I met him was in 2012, during a brief interview about his initiative to protect children from deadly diseases. At the time, he barely made eye contact and offered no small talk, leaving me wondering whether he might be on the spectrum.

His book confirms these suspicions. He describes his intense ability to hyperfocus on subjects, his obsessive tendencies, and his lack of social awareness.

As an elementary school student, he compiled a 177-page report on Delaware, requesting brochures from the state and even sending self-addressed stamped envelopes to businesses for annual reports. He was just 11 years old.

His sisters always knew he was different. Kristi, the eldest, recalls feeling protective of him. “He was not a normal kid… he would sit in his room and chew pencils down to the lead,” she recalls.

Libby, now a therapist, was unsurprised by his self-assessment. “The surprise was more his willingness to say ‘this might be the case’,” she notes.

Although Gates has never pursued a formal diagnosis and has no plans to, he acknowledges that his neurodivergence has been more of an asset than a hindrance. “The positive characteristics for my career have been more beneficial than the deficits have been a problem for me,” he states.

He also observes that neurodiversity is “certainly” overrepresented in Silicon Valley. “Learning something in great depth at a young age—that helps you in certain complex subjects.”

Elon Musk has similarly disclosed that he is on the autism spectrum, referencing Asperger’s syndrome. Unlike Musk and other Silicon Valley figures like Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos, Gates has not been closely associated with Donald Trump. However, he acknowledges having met with the former president for a three-hour dinner in December to discuss global health and poverty alleviation.

Regarding Zuckerberg’s decision to eliminate fact-checking on his platforms after Trump’s election, Gates remains unimpressed. “I don’t personally know how you draw that line, but I’m worried that we’re not handling that as well as we should,” he admits.

He is also deeply concerned about social media’s impact on children. He supports Australia’s proposed ban on social media for users under 16, stating, “There’s a good chance that’s a smart thing.”

Gates argues that social networking, even more than video games, “can absorb your time and make you worry about other people approving you,” stressing the need for careful regulation.

Reflecting on his journey, he acknowledges that his success was not a rags-to-riches story. His father was a lawyer, and while their financial situation was comfortable, paying for his private schooling was “a stretch, even on my father’s salary.”

Attending Lakeside School was pivotal. It was there that Gates first gained access to an early mainframe computer, thanks to a fundraising effort led by the school’s mothers. He and three friends spent every available moment on it, immersing themselves in programming when hardly anyone else had the opportunity.

Had it not been for that stroke of luck, the world might never have heard of Bill Gates.

Hope For Tomorrow Fundraiser: A World Without Childhood Blindness Campaign Launched The Eye Foundation of America Raises Over USD 1 MILLION During Fundraiser To End Childhood Blindness In India

February 4, 2025February 5, 2025 Ajay GhoshHealth 0

“I was born in a rural village in India, poor and legally blind, with no opportunity to exist,” Sam Maddula, Pharm.D., a distinguished leader, visionary entrepreneur, and dedicated philanthropist, said. Sam went on to add, how his life turned from darkness to light as his parents stumbled upon an Eye Camp that the Eye Foundation of America had set up in 1987 in rural Andhra Pradesh. “It is this organization that rescued me from a life of darkness. The Eye Foundation of America helped me get a visa to the United States. The esteemed Dr. VK Raju himself, performed dual corneal transplant surgery on me two weeks after my second birthday in the United States. He did it, working with the Eye Foundation for free. He cured me just like that, with the magic of his hands. I could see my life went from literal darkness to pure sunlight.”

Sam shared his life story with the audience during a Fund Raiser organized by The Eye Foundation of America, Grant Thornton, the Gautami Institute, The Rotary Club District – 3011 (Delhi) in collaboration with the Young Rotarians, with the theme, “Hope for Tomorrow” at the prestigious India Habitat Centre, New Delhi on Friday, January 31, 2025.

This life-changing miracle is one of the millions of Eye Surgeries that The Eye Foundation of America, led by the legendary Dr. Vadrevu K. Raju, a world-renowned ophthalmologist, philanthropist, and the founder of the Eye Foundation of America (EFA) and the Eye Foundation of UK, Chairman of Goutami Eye Institute has done in the past half a century, transforming the lives of millions of children, who are born every year with vision impairment.

The Fund Raiser, a pan-India Roll-out Program helped raise over $500,000, which was matched by the Eye Foundation of America, totaling over a $ 1 Million US Dollars. In addition, Sam Maddula offered to match two times, the funds that were raised on January 31^st, adding the total amount raised at the fundraiser even more.

Dr. Raju promised that the funds raised will be utilized towards establishing 100 ROP screening centers across India, training 500 healthcare professionals in Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) screening and treatment, and Treating 10,000 ROP-affected babies annually across India.

Offering an overview of childhood blindness and its impact on children, Dr. Raju told an enthusiastic audience, who had come from across India and the United States to support the noble cause, that childhood blindness has far-reaching consequences. Three-fourths of the children with visual impairment never attend school. Blindness reduces employability by 50%. Blindness increases poverty and social isolation. According to the South Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, of the 3.5 million premature babies born in India, nearly one in six (600,000) babies are born less than 32 weeks gestational age. Estimating that 40% of them receive neonatal care and 80% of them survive, over 200,000 children are at risk for developing Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP), Dr. Raju pointed out.

Dr. Raju has dedicated his entire life to helping make “the world where every child can see, learn, and thrive without the shadows of blindness.” Describing it as “God’s work” that he and the Eye Foundation are doing, Dr. Raju urged “everyone to join in the mission to eradicate childhood blindness, a tragedy, we can prevent it. Every child deserves to see the world with clarity and purpose. Let’s join hands to eradicate childhood blindness and unlock a brighter future for generations to come. Today, we make a new beginning in our concerted efforts to prevent and eradicate childhood blindness with the resources and the modern technology that are available today,” Dr. Raju said.

Lord Rami Ranger, a well-known philanthropist, and successful businessman from the United Kingdom, while echoing the mission of EFA said, “Childhood blindness is a solvable problem, but it requires our collective action.” According to Lord Ranger, a Board Member of the Eye Foundation of America and Eye Foundation of UK, who has been honored by Her Majesty the Queen on Eight occasions for his Business leadership in and for community services, “Together, we can ensure that every child has access to quality eye care and a chance to reach their full potential.”

Dr. Leela Raju, an Organizing Chair of the event, delivered the welcome address. The chief guest at the event was Dr Radhika Tandon, Chairperson of Retinopathy of Prematurity Center, who delivered the keynote address. Richa Jain Kallra, a TV News Anchor & Host eloquently emceed the event.

In her welcome address, Dr. Leela Raju stressed the importance of ensuring that more people know about the causes and the means to reduce childhood blindness and eradicate it. Dr. Leela Raju stated that the discussions today focused on “not just glaucoma, but cornea and pediatric ophthalmology. And of course, regarding retinopathy and prematurity, which is our real push in both Delhi and around India to reduce the burden of childhood blindness.”

Dr. Radhika Tandon, a global thought leader, who continues to inspire innovation and excellence in ophthalmology, shaping the future of visual care with her dedication and brilliance, in her keynote address, said, “A very, very big word of appreciation to the Eye Foundation of America, as well as the Gautami Eye Institute, for taking this initiative, of getting people together on this platform, and also for envisioning a world, where two countries across great continents and opposite sides of the globe can work together, to make a difference.”

“Close your eyes for a moment. Now imagine never being able to open them to the vibrant colors of life, a loved one’s smile, or the pages of a favorite story,” said Sandeep Saxena, the chief organizer, who coordinated the efforts leading up to the fundraiser in India. “For millions of premature babies, this is their reality. Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) is a silent thief of sight, making it one of the leading causes of childhood blindness. In India alone, 3.5 million premature babies are at risk. But we refuse to accept this. And we know you won’t either. Your kindness can save a child’s sight, their future, and their dreams.”

A day-long workshop on Empowering Vision Global Advances In Eye Care was organized, offering insights into the many aspects of vision impairment and ways to treat them. Dr. Thomas Johnson, a Specialist in Neuroscience at the Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Dr. Charles Cole, a dedicated educator, who is leading surgical training at the American Academy of Ophthalmology, Dr Karan Bhatia, Vice President of the Young Ophthalmologist Society of India (YOSI) were among those who addressed the audience.

Dr. Mukesh Batra, DG Mahesh Trikha, and PRIP Rtn Shekar Mehta delivered Special addresses during the fundraiser, offering ongoing collaboration and support to the Eye Foundation and its efforts to eradicate childhood blindness. Members of Grant Thornton, while describing their work in analyzing and finding effective ways to measure the outcome of the work being done by the Eye Foundation, offered to collaborate in the noble mission of the Foundation.

The grand finale was a live performance by the Surkriti Orchestra, National Association of the Blind, and a Fashion Show for a Purpose by the talented Shravan Kummar, Designer & Philanthropist, Weaving Magic Through Fabric, Blending Artistry & Purpose.

Earlier, A Mobile Bus was launched with the objective of reaching rural areas across India, offering screening and treatment to eradicate Childhood Blindness. A Memorandum of Understanding was signed between the Eye Foundation, Grant Thornton, and the Rotary Club of Gurugram, Haryana to continue this noble mission and support the initiatives of the Eye Foundation in its efforts to eradicate childhood blindness.

Urging everyone to be part of this noble mission, Dr. Raju said, “Together, Let Us Illuminate Young Lives and Create A World Without Childhood Blindness. Your Support Can: Change Lives, Restore Vision, And Empower Futures. Now, Let’s All Join the Movement; Be Part of Something Extraordinary.”

The organizers promise, “We’re embarking on a bold mission: to create a World Without Childhood Blindness. Starting with Rotary International District 3011, this initiative will expand nationwide, transforming countless young lives. Your help can make this dream come true! Join us at the “Hope for Tomorrow Fundraiser”

Every Rupee/Dollar you support will be matched 100% by the EFA Board.

Our goal?
Deliver life-saving Retinopathy of Prematurity screenings and treatments to premature infants.
Fund equipment needed for children’s screenings in ROP prevention and care.
Train and empower local healthcare heroes to sustain these efforts for years to come.

For more information, please visit: www.eyefoundationofamerica.org/ or, contact: info@eyefoundationofamerica.org

Trump Imposes New Tariffs on Imports from Canada, Mexico, and China

February 3, 2025February 5, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

Donald Trump has introduced new tariffs on goods imported into the U.S. from Canada, Mexico, and China. The former president signed an executive order imposing a 25% tariff on all imports from Canada and Mexico, aiming to pressure these countries into taking stronger action against illegal immigration and drug trafficking.

Additionally, a 10% tariff will be levied on goods from China, on top of existing duties, until the country addresses fentanyl smuggling. Trump has previously pledged to impose a 60% tariff on Chinese goods and has even considered a 200% tax on certain vehicle imports.

Tariffs have been a key component of Trump’s economic strategy, which he believes can bolster the U.S. economy, protect domestic jobs, and generate tax revenue. During his election campaign, he reassured voters that these taxes would not be a burden on them. “It’s not going to be a cost to you, it’s a cost to another country,” he asserted.

However, this claim was widely dismissed by economists as misleading.

How Tariffs Function

A tariff is essentially a domestic tax applied to goods entering the country, based on their value. For instance, if an imported car worth $50,000 is subject to a 25% tariff, an additional $12,500 charge will be applied. The cost of the tariff is paid by the domestic company that imports the product rather than the foreign exporter. In practice, this means U.S. firms must pay the tariff to the U.S. government.

In 2023, the U.S. imported approximately $3.1 trillion worth of goods, representing about 11% of the nation’s GDP. The tariffs imposed on these imports generated $80 billion in revenue, accounting for roughly 2% of total U.S. tax revenue.

However, the ultimate economic impact of tariffs is more complex. If an importing company passes the tariff cost onto consumers through price increases, American buyers bear the financial burden. Conversely, if the firm absorbs the cost, it results in reduced profits. A third possibility is that foreign exporters lower their prices to offset the tariff and maintain U.S. customers, leading to reduced profits on their end.

While all these scenarios are theoretically possible, economic analyses of the tariffs implemented by Trump between 2017 and 2020 indicate that American consumers bore most of the burden.

A University of Chicago survey conducted in September 2024 found that an overwhelming majority of economists agreed with the statement that “imposing tariffs results in a substantial portion of the tariffs being borne by consumers of the country that enacts the tariffs, through price increases,” with only 2% disagreeing.

Price Increases and Consumer Impact

One concrete example of tariff-driven price hikes is Trump’s 2018 decision to impose a 50% tariff on washing machine imports. Researchers found that this policy led to a 12% price increase, costing U.S. consumers approximately $1.5 billion annually.

If Trump were to introduce even higher tariffs in a future administration, the economic impact is expected to be similar. The Peterson Institute for International Economics, a nonpartisan think tank, estimates that Trump’s proposed tariffs would lower American incomes. The wealthiest fifth of Americans would see a reduction of around 2%, while the poorest fifth would experience a decline of approximately 4%.

A typical middle-income U.S. household would lose an estimated $1,700 per year due to these tariffs. The Center for American Progress, a left-leaning think tank, projects even higher losses, estimating that middle-income families could see annual financial hits ranging from $2,500 to $3,900.

Several economists have warned that another large round of tariffs could contribute to increased domestic inflation.

Job Market Effects

Trump has repeatedly justified his tariffs as a means to protect and create American jobs. “Under my plan, American workers will no longer be worried about losing your jobs to foreign nations, instead, foreign nations will be worried about losing their jobs to America,” he stated during his campaign.

His tariffs were introduced in response to longstanding concerns over the decline of U.S. manufacturing jobs due to globalization, particularly following the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Mexico in 1994 and China’s entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001.

In January 1994, when NAFTA came into effect, the U.S. had nearly 17 million manufacturing jobs. By 2016, that number had fallen to about 12 million.

However, many economists argue that this decline is not solely due to trade agreements but also reflects the rise of automation and other technological advancements.

Studies analyzing Trump’s first-term tariffs found no substantial overall employment gains in U.S. industrial sectors that were protected by these policies.

For example, in 2018, Trump imposed a 25% tariff on imported steel to support domestic steel producers. Yet, by 2020, employment in the U.S. steel industry had actually declined, standing at 80,000 jobs—down from 84,000 in 2018.

It is possible that without the tariffs, steel industry employment would have dropped even further. However, detailed economic studies concluded that the tariffs did not lead to meaningful job growth.

Moreover, some industries suffered indirect job losses due to higher material costs. For example, manufacturers reliant on steel, such as agricultural machinery producer Deere & Co, reportedly experienced lower employment levels as a result of higher steel prices.

Trade Deficit Challenges

Trump has frequently criticized the U.S. trade deficit, arguing that it harms the economy. “Trade deficits hurt the economy very badly,” he has claimed.

In 2016, before Trump assumed office, the U.S. trade deficit for goods and services was $480 billion, or about 2.5% of GDP. By 2020, despite his tariff policies, the deficit had ballooned to $653 billion, approximately 3% of GDP.

Economists attribute this increase partly to the impact of tariffs on currency values. By reducing demand for foreign currencies in international trade, tariffs strengthened the U.S. dollar, making American exports less competitive globally.

Additionally, tariffs in a globalized economy can often be circumvented.

For instance, Trump imposed a 30% tariff on Chinese solar panel imports in 2018. However, the U.S. Commerce Department later found that many Chinese manufacturers had relocated assembly operations to countries such as Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam. By exporting finished solar panels from these nations, companies effectively evaded U.S. tariffs.

Limited Support for Tariffs Among Economists

While most economists oppose Trump’s tariffs, some believe they could benefit U.S. industry. Jeff Ferry of the Coalition for a Prosperous America, a domestic industry advocacy group, supports the tariffs as a means of strengthening American manufacturing.

Similarly, Oren Cass, director of the conservative think tank American Compass, argues that tariffs can incentivize companies to keep production in the U.S., which he believes has national security and supply chain benefits.

Despite Trump’s aggressive trade policies, the Biden administration has retained many tariffs introduced after 2018. Additionally, Biden has imposed new tariffs on certain Chinese imports, including electric vehicles, citing concerns over national security, domestic industry protection, and unfair subsidies from Beijing.

Looking Ahead

As Trump prepares for a potential return to office, his tariff policies remain a focal point of economic debate. While he insists that tariffs will boost U.S. industry and protect jobs, economic studies suggest they have primarily increased costs for American consumers without delivering significant employment benefits.

With China, Canada, and Mexico vowing to retaliate, the long-term consequences of these policies remain uncertain.

UK Extracted $64.82 Trillion from India During Colonial Rule, Oxfam Report Reveals

February 2, 2025February 5, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

Oxfam International’s latest global inequality report, titled “Takers, Not Makers,” reveals that the United Kingdom extracted an astonishing $64.82 trillion from India over 135 years of colonial rule, from 1765 to 1900. Of this massive sum, $33.8 trillion benefited the wealthiest 10 percent of British society. This amount is so vast that it could cover London’s surface area almost four times over with £50 notes. The report, released just hours before the annual World Economic Forum meeting, highlights the enduring impact of colonial exploitation on global inequality.

“Legacies of inequality and pathologies of plunder, pioneered during the time of historical colonialism, continue to shape modern lives,” Oxfam stated in the report. The organization argues that colonial-era practices have created a deeply unequal world, marked by divisions rooted in racism and economic exploitation. Oxfam asserts that wealth continues to be systematically extracted from the Global South, primarily benefiting the richest individuals in the Global North.

The report draws from various studies and historical research to support its claims. According to Oxfam, the $33.8 trillion siphoned from India by the UK’s wealthiest during colonial times represents a significant portion of the total wealth extracted. “This would be enough to carpet the surface area of London in British pound 50 notes almost four times over,” the report emphasizes.

Oxfam also highlights that many of the UK’s wealthiest individuals today can trace their fortunes back to the colonial era, particularly to compensation payments given to slave owners after the abolition of slavery. This historical wealth accumulation has had a lasting effect, with economic advantages passed down through generations.

The report underscores the role of colonialism in shaping modern multinational corporations. Oxfam describes these corporations as products of colonial systems, with roots in entities like the East India Company, which operated with near-sovereign powers and was responsible for numerous colonial crimes. “In the modern day, multinational corporations, often occupying monopoly or near-monopoly positions, continue to exploit workers in the Global South, particularly women workers, on behalf of rich shareholders primarily based in the Global North,” Oxfam noted.

Global supply chains and export processing industries are portrayed as modern equivalents of colonial exploitation, facilitating the continuous transfer of wealth from the Global South to the Global North. Workers in these industries often face harsh conditions, lack collective bargaining rights, and receive minimal social protection. The report points out that wages in the Global South are between 87 percent and 95 percent lower than those in the Global North for jobs requiring similar skills.

Oxfam asserts that large multinational corporations dominate global supply chains, reaping the benefits of cheap labor and resource extraction from the Global South. These corporations capture the majority of profits while perpetuating economic dependence and exploitation. “They capture the vast majority of profits and perpetuate dependence, exploitation, and control through economic means,” the report states.

Beyond the wealthiest elites, colonialism also enriched the emerging middle class in Britain. Oxfam estimates that after the richest 10 percent, who received 52 percent of the income extracted from India, the new middle class claimed an additional 32 percent. This distribution of wealth underscores how deeply colonial exploitation was embedded in British society.

The economic impact of colonialism on India was devastating. In 1750, the Indian subcontinent accounted for around 25 percent of global industrial output. However, by 1900, this figure had plummeted to just 2 percent. Oxfam attributes this sharp decline to Britain’s protectionist trade policies, which systematically stifled India’s industrial growth. “This dramatic reduction can be attributed to Britain’s implementation of stringent protectionist policies against Asian textiles, which systematically undermined India’s industrial growth potential,” the report explains.

Ironically, it took a global conflict to temporarily ease this industrial suppression. During World War I (1914–1918), disruptions in colonial trade inadvertently spurred industrial growth in several colonies. Oxfam notes that regions experiencing significant declines in British imports during the war saw notable increases in industrial employment. “Regions with significant decreases in British imports during the war demonstrated enhanced industrial employment growth—a pattern that is still visible today,” the report observes.

The report further highlights that colonial expansion was often driven by private interests rather than purely state-led initiatives. Private companies like the East India Company played a central role in establishing and maintaining colonial dominance, exploiting both people and resources for profit. This legacy continues to influence modern corporate practices, where multinational corporations often prioritize profits over social responsibility, particularly in developing countries.

Oxfam’s report also connects historical colonial practices to present-day economic inequalities. The organization argues that the structures of global capitalism are deeply rooted in colonial systems of wealth extraction and exploitation. Modern economic policies, trade agreements, and corporate practices often mirror the same dynamics of control and dependency established during colonial times.

“Global supply chains and export processing industries represent modern colonial systems of south-north wealth extraction,” Oxfam states, drawing a direct line between historical colonialism and contemporary economic structures. The organization emphasizes that without addressing these systemic issues, global inequality will continue to deepen.

The report calls for urgent reforms to address these historical injustices and create a more equitable global economic system. Oxfam advocates for policies that promote fair wages, protect workers’ rights, and reduce the concentration of wealth among the global elite. The organization also emphasizes the importance of acknowledging and addressing the historical roots of modern economic disparities.

In conclusion, Oxfam’s “Takers, Not Makers” report paints a stark picture of the enduring impact of colonialism on global inequality. The staggering amounts of wealth extracted from India during British colonial rule—$64.82 trillion in total, with $33.8 trillion benefiting the richest 10 percent—highlight the scale of historical exploitation. The report underscores that the legacies of colonialism are not confined to the past but continue to shape the present, influencing everything from corporate practices to global economic policies.

“This has created a deeply unequal world, a world torn apart by division based on racism, a world that continues to systematically extract wealth from the Global South to primarily benefit the richest people in the Global North,” Oxfam concludes, calling for a global reckoning with the past to build a more just and equitable future.

Trump’s Cabinet Picks Face Intense Scrutiny in Heated Confirmation Hearings

February 1, 2025February 4, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

President Donald Trump’s cabinet nominees endured rigorous questioning from both Republican and Democratic senators during marathon confirmation hearings on Thursday. Two nominees in particular, Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence and Kash Patel for FBI director, faced sharp interrogations about their controversial past remarks and associations.

Tulsi Gabbard Questioned on Putin Ties and Snowden Support

Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii and military veteran, now Trump’s choice for director of national intelligence, encountered tough questions regarding her prior statements about Russia, her meeting with Syria’s former dictator Bashar al-Assad, and her past defense of whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Gabbard, who left the Democratic Party after her unsuccessful 2020 presidential bid and endorsed Trump in 2024, was grilled over comments that seemed sympathetic to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s stance on NATO. Democratic Senator Michael Bennet of Colorado highlighted Gabbard’s past remarks, quoting her statement that Putin had “legitimate security concerns” about NATO’s expansion into Eastern Europe. Bennet accused her of rationalizing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, pointing out that Russian state television even referred to her as “our friend Tulsi.”

Defending herself, Gabbard cited her military background as a lieutenant colonel in the National Guard, with deployments to the Middle East. However, critics emphasized her lack of formal intelligence experience, raising concerns about her suitability for the role.

When pressed about her past support for Edward Snowden, Gabbard remained evasive. Both Republican and Democratic senators questioned her stance on the former National Security Agency contractor who leaked classified documents exposing U.S. surveillance programs. Although Snowden’s leaks sparked widespread debate about government overreach, many argued his actions endangered national security.

Lawmakers repeatedly asked Gabbard if she considered Snowden a traitor, given that she had previously described him as “brave” and advocated for his pardon. Gabbard resisted providing a clear answer, creating an uncomfortable moment, particularly among Republican senators. “Snowden broke the law,” she acknowledged. “He released information about the United States… I have more immediate steps that I would take to prevent another Snowden.”

Controversy Over Gabbard’s Meeting with Assad

Another contentious topic was Gabbard’s 2017 trip to Syria, where she met with then-President Bashar al-Assad. The visit occurred despite the U.S. government’s strong opposition to Assad due to his regime’s brutal attacks on civilians, including chemical weapon use. Her meeting sparked bipartisan criticism at the time, raising questions about her judgment.

During the hearing, Gabbard defended the trip, stating she had posed “tough questions about his own regime’s actions.” She attempted to preempt criticism in her opening remarks, saying, “I have no love for Assad or Gaddafi or any dictator.” Addressing her stance on Assad’s eventual fall, she remarked, “I shed no tears for the fall of the Assad regime,” referencing the Syrian civil war’s shifting dynamics. However, she added, “But today we have an Islamist extremist who is now in charge of Syria,” suggesting that Assad’s ousting led to the rise of even more dangerous forces.

Kash Patel Faces Tough Questions About Capitol Riot Ties

Following Gabbard’s hearing, Kash Patel, nominated to lead the FBI, faced a grueling five-hour session dominated by questions about his ties to the January 6 Capitol riots and his previous controversial statements. Patel, a former federal prosecutor and Trump administration aide, was scrutinized for his support of individuals involved in the Capitol insurrection.

Senators focused on Patel’s role in promoting a charity song recorded by some January 6 rioters while in prison, including individuals convicted of violence against law enforcement. Democratic lawmakers repeatedly pressed him on his connections to these rioters and his broader views on the events of that day.

One senator asked pointedly, “Was President Donald Trump wrong to give blanket clemency to individuals involved in the January 6 attack?” The question referenced Trump’s public support and legal advocacy for some rioters. Patel dodged giving a direct answer, emphasizing his commitment to upholding the rule of law. “My focus will be on ensuring the FBI remains an independent agency, free from political influence,” he said, though his past affiliations left some senators unconvinced.

Patel’s Ties to the QAnon Movement Under Scrutiny

In addition to questions about the Capitol riots, Patel faced intense scrutiny over his alleged connections to the QAnon conspiracy movement. His previous social media activity, where he appeared to endorse QAnon-related content, raised alarms among senators concerned about the FBI’s leadership under someone with such associations.

Patel denied any formal ties to QAnon but struggled to explain his past comments praising figures linked to the movement. “I have never been part of any conspiracy group,” Patel asserted. “My priority is the safety and security of the American people.” Despite his denials, senators expressed doubts about his impartiality, given his public support for individuals who propagated election-related conspiracy theories.

A Polarizing Set of Hearings

The confirmation hearings highlighted the deep political divisions in Washington, with nominees like Gabbard and Patel embodying Trump’s unconventional approach to governance. Both faced bipartisan criticism, illustrating that their controversies transcended party lines.

Gabbard’s complex foreign policy views and past praise for figures like Snowden, coupled with her meeting with Assad, made her a target for Democrats and skeptical Republicans alike. Meanwhile, Patel’s alignment with Trump loyalists and his connections to the January 6 events fueled concerns about his ability to lead an agency tasked with protecting American democracy.

Throughout the hearings, the nominees attempted to deflect criticism and emphasize their qualifications. Gabbard leaned on her military service, while Patel pointed to his prosecutorial background. Yet their evasive responses on key issues left many senators frustrated.

Final Takeaways

The hearings reflected not only the contentious nature of Trump’s cabinet selections but also the broader ideological battles shaping U.S. politics. As the Senate prepares to vote on their confirmations, both Gabbard and Patel face uncertain paths forward, with bipartisan skepticism threatening to derail their nominations.

Ultimately, these hearings served as a reminder that even in a polarized environment, certain issues—like national security and the integrity of democratic institutions—can unite lawmakers across the aisle in demanding accountability from those seeking high office.

Trump Announces Tariff Campaign Targeting Multiple Countries to Revive U.S. Manufacturing

February 1, 2025February 4, 2025 Staff ReporterBusiness, World 0

Former President Donald Trump has declared that his tariffs campaign will officially commence on February 1, targeting several countries as part of his broader effort to boost American manufacturing and fulfill key policy objectives.

Speaking from the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump outlined his initial plans, which include imposing a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico to reinforce U.S. border security. Additionally, he announced a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, aimed at curbing the flow of drug imports into the country.

Trump emphasized the dual purpose of these tariffs—strengthening the domestic economy while addressing issues like border security and drug trafficking. “Trump has been clear about his desire to end the fentanyl crisis, and it’s time for Mexico and Canada to join the fight as well,” a White House official told Business Insider (BI). Trump also argued that the tariff on China would help combat the fentanyl crisis.

Economic Impact and Reactions

Economists widely predict that companies affected by these tariffs will likely pass the increased costs onto consumers. Industries such as electronics, groceries, and apparel are expected to experience noticeable price hikes if the tariffs are implemented. Several companies have already indicated they are preparing to raise prices in response to the anticipated cost increases.

Despite concerns from economists, the White House insists the tariffs will help deliver on Trump’s campaign promises. According to the administration, these measures are necessary to protect American industries and address pressing issues like the opioid epidemic.

Countries in Trump’s Crosshairs

Trump’s tariffs campaign is not limited to Canada, Mexico, and China. His trade proposals have identified several countries that could face similar measures if they do not align with U.S. policy interests.

China: A Central Target

China has been a focal point of Trump’s tariff strategy since his 2016 presidential campaign. Back then, he proposed a sweeping 60% tariff on all Chinese imports, alongside tariffs ranging from 10% to 20% on goods from other nations.

However, after assuming office, Trump’s approach to China became more specific. On January 21, he announced plans to implement a 10% tariff on Chinese imports starting February 1, citing China’s role in fentanyl exports to Mexico and Canada. “It’s based on the fact that they’re sending fentanyl to Mexico and Canada,” Trump said, though he did not provide details on any specific incidents related to fentanyl exports.

China is a significant supplier of electronics to the U.S., meaning products like smartphones, computers, and gaming devices could become more expensive as a result of the new tariffs.

In response to Trump’s announcement, Mao Ning, a spokesperson for China’s Foreign Ministry, stated on February 22, “We believe that there’s no winner in a trade or tariff war, and we will firmly uphold our national interests.”

Canada and Mexico: Tariffs Tied to Border Policies

Trump also issued a stern warning to Canada and Mexico. On January 20, he threatened to impose a 25% tariff on products from both countries, with the potential implementation date set for February 1. This threat follows a previous post he made on his social media platform, Truth Social, where he declared that he would impose such tariffs on his first day back in office unless Canada and Mexico took steps to strengthen their border policies.

The U.S. relies heavily on imports from both neighboring countries. From Canada, the U.S. imports approximately $92 billion worth of crude oil annually, along with billions of dollars in vehicles and automotive parts. Mexico is another key trading partner, supplying not only car components but also $25 billion worth of computers to the U.S. each year.

Trump’s aggressive stance extends beyond North America. On Truth Social, he wrote, “If we don’t make a ‘deal,’ and soon, I have no other choice but to put high levels of Taxes, Tariffs, and Sanctions on anything being sold by Russia to the United States, and various other participating countries.”

Russia: Limited Trade, Minimal Consumer Impact

In 2023, the U.S. imported around $4.57 billion worth of goods from Russia, accounting for just 0.14% of total U.S. imports that year, according to Census data. Given the relatively small volume of Russian exports to the U.S., any tariffs imposed on Russian goods would likely have minimal impact on American consumers.

Colombia: Tariffs as a Response to Migration Disputes

Trump’s tariff threats have also extended to Colombia following a diplomatic spat over deportation flights. After Colombian President Gustavo Petro’s administration refused to accept two flights carrying deported migrants from the U.S., Trump retaliated with a threat to impose a 25% tariff on Colombian goods. He further warned that the tariff could escalate to 50% within a week if Colombia did not comply with U.S. demands.

“We will not allow the Colombian Government to violate its legal obligations with regard to the acceptance and return of the criminals they forced into the United States!” Trump declared on Truth Social.

In response, President Petro defended his government’s position, stating that Colombia would receive its citizens “on civilian planes, without treating them like criminals.” Following Petro’s remarks, the White House withdrew the tariff threat but cautioned that it could be reinstated if Colombia failed to honor its commitments.

Colombia exports a variety of goods to the U.S., including coffee, flowers, and textiles. A tariff on these products could lead to price increases for American consumers who purchase Colombian imports.

The Broader Implications of Trump’s Tariff Strategy

Trump’s tariffs campaign reflects his broader economic philosophy, which prioritizes American manufacturing and seeks to reduce the U.S.’s reliance on foreign goods. His administration argues that tariffs are an effective tool to achieve these goals, as they can pressure foreign governments to change policies while encouraging domestic production.

However, critics argue that tariffs often backfire, leading to higher prices for consumers and strained relationships with key trading partners. Economists have long debated the effectiveness of tariffs, with many warning that trade wars can hurt both sides. As Mao Ning of China’s Foreign Ministry noted, “There’s no winner in a trade or tariff war.”

Despite these concerns, Trump remains steadfast in his belief that tariffs are essential to protecting American interests. His administration has framed the issue as not just an economic matter, but also one of national security, particularly in relation to border control and the fight against drug trafficking.

What’s Next?

As the February 1 deadline approaches, businesses, consumers, and foreign governments are closely watching to see how Trump’s tariffs will unfold. Some companies are already adjusting their supply chains in anticipation of higher costs, while others are preparing to pass those costs onto consumers.

Meanwhile, foreign leaders are weighing their responses. Some, like China, have signaled their intent to defend their national interests, while others, like Colombia, have shown a willingness to negotiate to avoid economic penalties.

Ultimately, the success of Trump’s tariffs campaign will depend on how effectively it can achieve its intended goals without causing undue harm to American consumers or the broader economy. For now, the only certainty is that February 1 will mark the beginning of a new chapter in U.S. trade policy—one defined by aggressive tariffs and high-stakes diplomacy.

U.S. Economy Grows 2.3% in Late 2024 as Consumer Spending Drives Expansion

January 31, 2025February 4, 2025 Staff ReporterBusiness 0

The U.S. economy continued its steady growth in the final months of 2024, fueled by strong consumer spending. According to a report from the Commerce Department released on Thursday, the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) expanded at an annual rate of 2.3% in October, November, and December. This marks a slight decline from the third quarter when GDP grew at a 3.1% annual pace.

Americans increased their spending on both goods and services in the last quarter, with purchases of big-ticket items surging at an annual rate exceeding 12%. This uptick in consumer activity may have been influenced by concerns over potential tariffs, as President Trump has threatened to impose new trade barriers.

“The consumer is driving the economic train,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. “The economy is creating a boatload of jobs and unemployment is low,” which has provided people with the financial security to continue spending.

However, business investment did not keep pace with consumer spending, experiencing a decline during the quarter.

By the end of 2024, the U.S. economy had expanded by 2.5% compared to the final months of 2023, a stronger performance than most other major economies. In contrast, GDP growth in Europe remained stagnant throughout the year.

The strong economy was also supported by rising stock market gains and record-high home values, which contributed to consumer confidence—particularly among wealthier individuals.

“When they feel wealthy, they feel confident and they save a little bit less and spend a little bit more,” Zandi explained. “The real juice here is coming from folks who are in good financial shape. Lower-income households, they’re still struggling.”

Despite the solid growth, economic forecasters have expressed concerns about the sustainability of this momentum in 2025.

“The biggest risk to our 2025 forecast is an immediate imposition of across-the-board tariffs on key trading partners,” wrote Bernard Yaros of Oxford Economics in a research note.

Yaros estimated that if Trump proceeds with his plan to levy tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China, it could reduce GDP growth by over 1% this year.

While consumer spending remains strong, anxiety about the broader economy persists. A report from the Conference Board released this week indicated that consumer confidence declined to its lowest level in four months in January.

Judicial Panel Begins Probe into Maha Kumbh Stampede, Aims for Swift Conclusion

January 31, 2025February 4, 2025 Staff ReporterIndia 0

The three-member judicial commission appointed by the Uttar Pradesh government to investigate the causes of the tragic stampede at the Maha Kumbh has a one-month deadline to complete its inquiry but will attempt to speed up the process, said panel head Harsh Kumar on Thursday, January 30, 2025.

Mr. Kumar, a retired judge, told PTI that the commission members would soon visit Prayagraj as part of their investigation.

Panel Takes Charge Immediately

Along with Mr. Kumar, the panel includes former Director General of Police (DGP) V.K. Gupta and retired IAS officer D.K. Singh. The three officials reached their designated office on Thursday and immediately began their work, according to an official statement.

“We have taken charge within hours of the announcement as the probe has to be taken up on priority,” Mr. Kumar said, emphasizing the urgency of the matter.

Efforts to Expedite the Inquiry

Regarding the investigation’s timeline, Mr. Kumar stated, “We have a one-month timeline but all the same, we will try to expedite it.” However, he did not specify when the commission members would visit Prayagraj.

When asked whether each member of the panel would investigate different aspects of the incident, Mr. Kumar responded, “We will discuss this amongst ourselves. Can’t go into detail right now.”

Stampede at the Sangam Area

The tragic incident occurred in the early hours of Wednesday at the Sangam area of the Maha Kumbh, as millions of devotees gathered to take a holy dip on Mauni Amavasya, one of the most sacred days in the Hindu calendar. At least 30 people lost their lives, and around 60 others sustained injuries in the stampede.

Overcrowding and Barricade Breach

According to police reports, the stampede happened when the crowd breached barricades, leading to a crushing situation for those waiting on the other side. Authorities have since intensified crowd management efforts to prevent further incidents.

The judicial panel is expected to analyze these factors closely and submit its findings within the given timeframe.

Akhand Hindu Rashtra’s Constitution Finalized, Set for Unveiling at Mahakumbh

January 29, 2025February 1, 2025 Staff ReporterIndia 0

A 501-page “Constitution” for the proposed “Akhand Hindu Rashtra” has been completed and is scheduled to be unveiled at the Mahakumbh before being submitted to the Centre on Basant Panchami, February 2.

Drafted by a 25-member committee of scholars, the document draws its foundation from ancient Hindu scriptures, including the Ramayana, Manusmriti, the teachings of Krishna, and Chanakya’s Arthashastra. The committee, called the Hindu Rashtra Samvidhan Nirmal Samiti, comprises Sanatan Dharma scholars from institutions such as Banaras Hindu University, Sampurnanand Sanskrit University in Varanasi, and the Central Sanskrit University in New Delhi.

Swami Anand Swaroop Maharaj, a patron of the committee, addressed reporters at the Mahakumbh on Monday, outlining the vision to transform India into a Hindu nation by 2035. “Human values are in the nucleus of our Constitution, which has been prepared by 14 scholars from north and 11 from south India. Our Constitution is not against other religions but those who are found involved in anti-national activities will face harsher punishment than what is awarded to them currently,” stated Swaroop, who heads the Shambhavi Peeth in Varanasi.

He further pointed out the contrast between Hinduism and other religious identities in terms of nationhood. “Over 300 amendments have been made in the Indian Constitution in the last seven decades but our scriptures are the same for the last several thousand centuries. There are 127 Christian, 57 Muslim and 15 Buddhist countries. Even the Jews have Israel. But the Hindus, whose population is over 175 crore across the world, have no Hindu nation,” he said.

Kameshwar Upadhyaya, president of the committee, elaborated on some of the governance and policy measures outlined in the proposed Constitution. “Military education would be mandatory for every citizen in the Hindu Rashtra,” he said, adding that stricter laws would be implemented against theft. Additionally, the economic structure would be reformed with a revised tax system, which would include the elimination of taxes on agriculture.

The document envisions a unicameral legislature, referred to as the Hindu Dharma Parliament, with its members called Dharmik Sansads. The voting age has been proposed to be set at 16 years, and only individuals who adhere to Sanatan Dharma would be permitted to contest elections.

“The Rashtradhyaksh, the chief of the country, would be chosen by three-fourths of the elected members of the legislature,” Swaroop added, emphasizing a distinct governance structure.

A sadhu from Varanasi, speaking anonymously to The Telegraph, remarked on the potential long-term impact of the proposal. “This may sound ridiculous at the moment but this is how an issue is brought into public debate and eventually implemented,” he said.

Trump Announces Likely White House Visit by PM Modi in February

January 28, 2025February 1, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

US President Donald Trump has indicated that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit the White House for a meeting next month, likely in February.

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Monday, while en route back to Joint Base Andrews from Florida, Trump shared details about his recent conversation with Modi. “I had a long talk with him this morning (Monday). He is going to be coming to the White House, over next month, probably February. We have a very good relationship with India,” the president remarked.

Trump’s comments came in response to a query about his phone call with the Indian Prime Minister earlier that day. When asked to elaborate on their discussion, the president stated, “Everything came up (in a phone call with Modi).”

The upcoming meeting, if confirmed, will build upon the cordial rapport between the two leaders. Trump and Modi share a strong personal connection, which has been evident in their past interactions. Notably, the two leaders addressed massive crowds together at two high-profile events: the “Howdy Modi” rally in Houston in September 2019 and the “Namaste Trump” event in Ahmedabad in February 2020.

Trump’s last foreign trip as president during his initial term in office was to India, underscoring the significance of U.S.-India relations during his tenure.

Prime Minister Modi, known for his proactive diplomatic engagements, was also among the first three world leaders to congratulate Trump following his remarkable electoral victory in November 2024, reflecting the close ties between the two nations.

This meeting, if it takes place, will be another milestone in the ongoing cooperation and dialogue between the United States and India.

Nvidia Stock Rebounds Slightly After Historic Drop Amid DeepSeek’s Impact

January 28, 2025January 31, 2025 Staff ReporterNews 0

The share price of Nvidia, a leading chip manufacturer for artificial intelligence (AI), experienced a modest recovery as U.S. stock markets reopened on Tuesday morning. Following a historic loss on Monday, Nvidia’s shares rose by 1.5% in early trading, signaling a slight rebound for the tech giant. Other major tech stocks also showed signs of stabilization after facing turbulence triggered by the emergence of a new Chinese AI app, DeepSeek.

On Monday, Nvidia made headlines with the largest single-day loss in U.S. market history. Its stock price plummeted by 17%, erasing more than $500 billion in market value. To put this into perspective, the loss was equivalent to the combined market valuations of ExxonMobil and MasterCard. Despite this setback, Nvidia remains one of the most valuable companies globally, with a market valuation exceeding $2.9 trillion. Currently, only Apple and Microsoft rank higher in terms of market capitalization.

The introduction of DeepSeek, an AI application developed in China, is believed to have shaken investor confidence in Nvidia and other tech firms. The app has quickly gained prominence for being developed at a fraction of the cost of its competitors while achieving remarkable success. It has already surpassed rivals like ChatGPT to become the most downloaded free app in the United States. DeepSeek’s rapid ascent has sparked concerns about the potential erosion of America’s dominance in the AI sector.

U.S. President Donald Trump weighed in on the situation, calling the rise of DeepSeek a “wake-up call” for the American tech industry. His comments underscored the urgency for the U.S. to maintain its technological edge amid growing competition from China.

The tech-heavy Nasdaq stock index, which saw a sharp decline of over 3% on Monday, showed slight improvement on Tuesday, rising 0.2% in early trading. Among major tech players, Alphabet, Google’s parent company, recorded a modest 0.1% increase, while Microsoft shares dipped by 0.6%.

DeepSeek’s impact on global markets extended beyond the U.S. On Tuesday, Japan’s Nikkei 225 index fell by 1.39%, reflecting investor jitters. However, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index managed to post a small gain of 0.14%. Markets in Taiwan, South Korea, and China remained closed due to the Lunar New Year holiday.

The Lunar New Year also brought a temporary pause to DeepSeek’s activities. According to the South China Morning Post, the Hangzhou-based start-up, led by founder Liang Wenfeng, entered “holiday mode” as China began its week-long celebrations. The report noted that the company had gone “quiet” since its last update at midnight on Lunar New Year’s Eve. DeepSeek’s office building appeared deserted on Tuesday morning, with the start-up reportedly receiving an influx of uninvited visitors in recent days.

While DeepSeek enjoys its Lunar New Year break, the ripple effects of its emergence continue to be felt. Nvidia, as a key player in AI chip production, bore the brunt of the market’s reaction. Investors expressed concern over the competitive threat posed by DeepSeek, leading to a rapid sell-off of Nvidia shares on Monday. Despite this, Nvidia’s strong market position and its critical role in powering AI technologies have helped it retain its status as a tech giant.

The broader U.S. tech sector appears to have found some footing after Monday’s turmoil. Early trading on Tuesday suggested a degree of stability, though uncertainties surrounding DeepSeek and its implications for the global AI landscape remain. For now, Nvidia’s slight rebound offers a glimmer of hope for investors, but the challenges posed by rising Chinese competitors will likely keep the pressure on U.S. tech firms.

Madison Keys Stuns Aryna Sabalenka to Clinch Maiden Grand Slam Title

January 27, 2025January 31, 2025 Staff ReporterSports 0

Madison Keys etched her name in tennis history on Saturday by claiming her first Grand Slam title at the Australian Open. The 29-year-old American defeated two-time defending champion and world No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka in a nail-biting final, triumphing 6-3, 2-6, 7-5.

Keys began the match with remarkable precision, showcasing impeccable serving, aggressive returns, and groundstrokes that matched Sabalenka’s famed power. Her outstanding play enabled her to claim the first set decisively. “Everything seemed to click,” remarked a commentator on Keys’ performance during the opening set, as she dominated from the baseline and kept Sabalenka on the defensive.

However, Sabalenka, renowned as the most dominant hard-court player in the women’s game, fought back in the second set. The Belarusian rediscovered her rhythm, and Keys, who had been fluid and composed, began to falter. Unforced errors crept into her game, and Sabalenka capitalized, breaking Keys twice to level the match.

This was not the first time Keys found herself on the cusp of Grand Slam glory. She previously reached the 2017 US Open final and four major semifinals. Yet, those moments had slipped through her grasp, including a heartbreaking loss to Sabalenka in the 2023 US Open semifinal after holding a commanding lead. This time, however, Keys refused to let history repeat itself.

The final set saw both players battling fiercely, with neither willing to give an inch. Keys, undeterred by her opponent’s resilience, served brilliantly in her opening games of the third set, matching Sabalenka stride for stride. The scores remained level at 5-5, with the tension mounting. Not since 2012 had a women’s Grand Slam final been this closely contested in the decisive set.

“I have wanted this for so long,” Keys said in her emotional on-court interview. “I didn’t know if I’d ever get back to this position to try for a trophy again. My team believed in me every step of the way, so thank you so much.” Reflecting on her challenging journey, she added, “Last year was tough with injuries, and I didn’t know if I’d ever be able to do this again. To be here, holding this trophy, with my husband by my side—I love you all so much.”

The turning point came when Keys, serving at 5-5, produced two stunning forehand winners to hold serve. Building on that momentum, she broke Sabalenka’s serve in the next game with another winner, sealing a dramatic 7-5 victory. She celebrated by raising her arms in triumph before embracing her team, including her coach and husband, Bjorn Fratangelo.

Sabalenka, seeking to become the first woman in 26 years to win three consecutive Australian Open titles, was visibly frustrated. She smashed her racket in anger before graciously congratulating Keys and joking with her team during the trophy ceremony. “Madison was incredible, and I couldn’t do anything in this match,” Sabalenka admitted. “Next time I play her, I’ll bring better tennis.” Despite her disappointment, she added humor to the moment, joking with her team, “I really hate you guys right now, but thank you for everything.”

Keys’ journey to the title was nothing short of extraordinary. On her way to the final, she defeated higher-ranked players, including Elena Rybakina, Danielle Collins, and world No. 2 Iga Świątek. Her win over Świątek made her the first woman since Serena Williams in 2005 to beat both the world No. 1 and No. 2 seeds at the Australian Open.

Keys started the final with unmatched intensity, racing to a 5-1 lead in the opening set. Sabalenka appeared unsettled, committing two double faults and losing her serve early. Keys, on the other hand, was nearly flawless, missing just three first serves and hitting her targets with precision. Even seemingly difficult shots, such as a backhand slice that appeared destined for the net, found their mark, leaving Sabalenka stranded and visibly frustrated.

After wrapping up the first set 6-3, Sabalenka left the court to regroup and returned with renewed focus. Her serve became more consistent, giving her a foothold in the second set. Meanwhile, Keys struggled to maintain her earlier form, hitting as many unforced errors in the first four games of the second set as she had in the entire first set. Sabalenka capitalized on these mistakes, taking control to level the match.

The third set saw a return to form for Keys, who served first and set the tone with a dominant hold. Both players fought tooth and nail, exchanging powerful rallies and holding serve until 5-5. Just when it seemed a tiebreak was inevitable, Keys found an extra gear, holding serve at 6-5 and breaking Sabalenka to clinch the championship.

A former tennis prodigy, Keys had long been considered a future Grand Slam champion. However, injuries and near-misses had delayed her breakthrough. The disappointment of losing the 2017 US Open final to Sloane Stephens in straight sets, followed by her collapse against Sabalenka in the 2023 US Open semifinal, only added to the pressure. Saturday’s victory was a moment of redemption, silencing doubts about her ability to win on the biggest stage.

“Something felt different this year,” Keys explained. “I’ve worked so hard, and to come through such a tough draw and play my best tennis in the final means the world to me.”

The victory was a testament to her resilience and determination. Keys’ journey through the Australian Open featured some of the most impressive performances of her career, marked by her ability to rise to the occasion against top-ranked opponents.

Meanwhile, Sabalenka remained gracious in defeat. Despite her frustration, she commended Keys for her exceptional performance and vowed to come back stronger. “Sending love to my team—I love you even though we lost,” she said, acknowledging their support throughout the tournament.

Madison Keys’ triumph at the Australian Open marks a new chapter in her career, one that seemed destined but often out of reach. Her victory not only cements her status among the elite of women’s tennis but also serves as an inspiration for perseverance and belief in one’s abilities. For Keys, the long-awaited Grand Slam title is a dream fulfilled and a moment she will cherish forever.

YRF Spy Universe: Bollywood’s Highest-Grossing Film Franchise

January 26, 2025January 29, 2025 Staff ReporterCinema 0

In recent years, India’s film industry has been captivated by the success of major franchises such as Pushpa, Baahubali, and KGF. However, one Bollywood cinematic universe has quietly climbed to the apex of box office success, propelled by its association with three of Bollywood’s biggest stars—Shah Rukh Khan, Salman Khan, and Hrithik Roshan.

This universe, Yash Raj Films’ (YRF) Spy Universe, now holds the title of India’s highest-grossing film franchise, having accumulated an astounding ₹2,900 crore in global box office earnings.

The Films of the YRF Spy Universe

The YRF Spy Universe currently comprises five films:

Three Tiger series movies (Ek Tha Tiger, Tiger Zinda Hai, and Tiger 3) starring Salman Khan.
Hrithik Roshan’s action-packed War.
Shah Rukh Khan’s blockbuster Pathaan.

Box Office Performance of Each Film

The franchise’s financial success is evenly distributed among its films. The Tiger series alone has contributed ₹1,366 crore to its global earnings. Shah Rukh Khan’s Pathaanemerged as a massive hit, bringing in ₹1,050 crore worldwide. Meanwhile, Hrithik Roshan’s War added ₹475 crore to the tally. Together, these films have propelled the total earnings of the YRF Spy Universe to ₹2,900 crore globally, as reported by Hindustan Times.

Origins of the YRF Spy Universe

The YRF Spy Universe was the brainchild of Aditya Chopra, who envisioned a franchise centered around Indian super spies. The journey began in 2012 with the release of Ek Tha Tiger, followed by Tiger Zinda Hai and War. Initially, these films were standalone projects with shared themes but no explicit connection.

The idea of a cohesive universe took shape during the pandemic, eventually leading to Pathaan in 2023, which marked the official unification of the franchise. The film introduced crossovers and cameos, cementing the foundation of the YRF Spy Universe. Later in 2023, Tiger 3 expanded the narrative further.

Comparing the YRF Spy Universe with Other Franchises

Before the YRF Spy Universe took center stage, Baahubali held the record as India’s highest-grossing franchise, earning over ₹2,300 crore from just two films. The Pushpa series joined this elite club with ₹2,000 crore from two installments, while KGF brought in ₹1,500 crore. Rohit Shetty’s Cop Universe, which amassed ₹1,430 crore, was previously the only franchise in the top five to include more than two films.

What sets the YRF Spy Universe apart is its innovative strategy of creating standalone films that interconnect to form a larger, cohesive narrative, rather than relying solely on sequels.

Future Prospects for the YRF Spy Universe

The YRF Spy Universe shows no signs of slowing down and is on track to surpass the ₹3,000-crore and ₹4,000-crore benchmarks. Two major releases are slated for this year.

First, War 2 is set to release in October, featuring Hrithik Roshan reprising his role as Kabir. This time, he faces off against Jr NTR, a move designed to tap into a pan-India audience. The film is widely anticipated to dominate the box office.

Following this, the franchise is set to break new ground with its first female-led installment, Alpha, slated for release on December 25. Starring Alia Bhatt and Sharvari, this marks a bold and exciting chapter for the YRF Spy Universe.

With such ambitious projects and its history of box office triumphs, the YRF Spy Universe seems poised to further solidify its dominance in the Indian cinematic landscape. As the franchise continues to grow, the question remains: just how high can this Bollywood espionage empire soar?

Library of Congress: A Timeless Repository of Knowledge

January 25, 2025January 28, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

Established in 1800, the Library of Congress holds the distinction of being the oldest federal cultural institution in the United States. Its origin is intertwined with the establishment of Washington, D.C., as the nation’s capital. The legislation that relocated the U.S. capital from Philadelphia also created the Library of Congress, with President John Adams approving the bill. This initial act allocated $5,000—equivalent to around $122,000 today—for purchasing books to serve Congress. Recognizing the growing significance of the library, Thomas Jefferson elevated the librarian of Congress to a presidential appointment two years later.

From these modest beginnings, the Library of Congress has grown into the largest library in the world. As of September 2022, its vast collection housed over 175 million items, with an impressive 10,000 additions each day. This monumental repository of knowledge spans a wide array of formats and subjects, reflecting centuries of intellectual pursuit.

A Collection Like No Other

The Library of Congress boasts an assortment of unique and captivating artifacts. Among its treasures is the smallest book in its collection, Old King Cole, a nursery rhyme that measures just 1/25th of an inch—about the size of a period. On the other end of the spectrum, the largest item is a photo book showcasing images of Bhutan, measuring a remarkable 5 by 7 feet.

While books form the cornerstone of the library, its holdings extend far beyond print. The collection encompasses audio materials, maps, sheet music, photographs, newspapers, manuscripts, presidential papers, and various other media. Together, these resources provide an unparalleled window into human history and creativity.

Fascinating Facts in Numbers

The Library of Congress is not only a treasure trove of information but also a symbol of scale and diversity. In 2022, it welcomed 370,000 visitors, highlighting its enduring appeal to scholars, tourists, and history enthusiasts.

Its National Film Registry, a celebrated archive of culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant films, includes 850 movies. These films span decades of cinematic history and reflect the diverse narratives that have shaped American culture.

Remarkably, the library’s collection represents over 470 languages, underscoring its commitment to preserving global heritage. This linguistic diversity ensures that the Library of Congress serves as a resource not just for the United States but for the entire world.

Behind the scenes, a dedicated team of 3,172 permanent staff members maintains the library’s operations. Their efforts ensure that this institution remains a vital hub for research, education, and preservation.

Conclusion

The Library of Congress, established during the formative years of the United States, stands as a testament to the enduring value of knowledge and culture. From its tiny beginnings with a modest budget to its current status as the world’s largest library, it has grown into a beacon of intellectual achievement. Whether through its collection of rare books, diverse media, or unique artifacts, it continues to inspire curiosity and serve as a cornerstone of the nation’s cultural legacy.

Indian Cardinal George Jacob Koovakad Appointed Prefect for Interreligious Dialogue by Vatican

January 25, 2025January 27, 2025 Staff ReporterReligion 0

On January 24, the Vatican announced the appointment of Cardinal George Jacob Koovakad as the prefect of the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue. In addition to this prestigious role, Cardinal Koovakad will continue serving as the coordinator of Apostolic Journeys at the Secretary of State.

At 51 years old, Cardinal Koovakad is a member of the Syro-Malabar Church. His journey in the clergy began with his ordination as a priest in 2004 for the Changanacherry Archeparchy. Over the years, he has held various roles in the Church, and on December 7, 2024, Pope Francis elevated him to the position of Cardinal.

By assuming his new responsibilities, Cardinal Koovakad joins the ranks of other notable Indian cardinals who have made significant contributions to the universal Church. These include Cardinal Simon Lourdusamy, who once served as the prefect of the Congregation for the Oriental Churches, and Cardinal Ivan Dias, who led the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples.

This announcement coincides with a significant milestone in the Catholic Church’s history: the diamond jubilee of Nostra Aetate. This landmark document from the Second Vatican Council, officially titled “Declaration on the Relation of the Church with Non-Christian Religions,” was promulgated by Pope Paul VI on October 28, 1965. Nostra Aetate revolutionized the Church’s approach to people of other faiths, emphasizing the importance of mutual understanding and interreligious dialogue.

Interreligious dialogue has traditionally encompassed four key dimensions: the dialogue of life, the dialogue of action, the dialogue of theological exchange, and the dialogue of religious experience. These aspects aim to create meaningful interactions between people of different faiths, fostering mutual respect and collaboration. Over time, theologians and scholars have continued to expand on the concept, underlining its importance for the Church’s mission and life.

Pope John Paul II was instrumental in highlighting the significance of interreligious dialogue as a core aspect of his papacy. Pope Francis, however, has integrated it even further into the global mission of the Church. Whether addressing the faithful in locations such as Dhaka, Dubai, Myanmar, or Mongolia, Pope Francis consistently emphasizes the need for interreligious dialogue as a pathway to peace and cooperation.

At the Vatican, Pope Francis has welcomed numerous delegations from various religious traditions. During these meetings, he has reiterated the necessity of working collectively toward peace and the greater good of humanity. He has also voiced concern about the detrimental impact of religious fundamentalism, describing it as a destructive force akin to a virus. For the Pope, engaging with and respecting other religions is essential in today’s world. “Religious fundamentalism, like a virus, is destroying our life and our cultures in numerous ways,” Pope Francis has observed, while also stressing that mutual dialogue can lead to the purification and renewal of all religions.

Those who actively participate in interreligious dialogue are often empowered to contribute to peace and the values of the Kingdom of God. These include fostering fraternity, justice, dignity, and human rights, as well as promoting enlightenment and the flourishing of life.

Under Pope Francis, interreligious dialogue has become an indispensable component of the Church’s evangelizing mission. The need to explore innovative ways to engage with people of other faiths is more urgent than ever. Such efforts aim to create a world where people can collaborate, grow, and thrive together in harmony.

Cardinal Koovakad’s upbringing in Indian culture, known for its emphasis on respecting diversity, has undoubtedly influenced his worldview. As he steps into his new role, he carries with him the potential to further the mission of fostering fraternity and dialogue among people of various religions, cultures, and perspectives. The Church recognizes that interreligious dialogue is not merely a task but a vital avenue for building bridges in a world often marked by division.

As Cardinal Koovakad shoulders this significant responsibility, his energy and youthful zeal offer hope for strengthening relationships between diverse communities. His leadership in the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue is expected to pave the way for deeper connections and understanding among followers of different faiths. Through these efforts, the Church hopes to inspire mutual respect and shared progress on the path to peace and unity.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and S Jaishankar Discuss Key Bilateral and Global Issues

January 25, 2025January 26, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

In Washington DC today, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio held his first meeting with India’s External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, during which the issue of “irregular immigration” was a prominent topic of discussion.

According to a readout provided by State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce, Rubio underscored the Trump administration’s commitment to working collaboratively with India to address this concern. “Rubio emphasised the Trump administration’s desire to work with India to advance economic ties and address concerns related to irregular migration,” Bruce stated.

The two leaders reaffirmed their shared dedication to strengthening the India-US partnership, Bruce added. They explored an array of topics, including regional matters and avenues to further enhance collaboration between the two countries in areas such as critical and emerging technologies, defence cooperation, energy security, and promoting a free and open Indo-Pacific region.

After the meeting, Jaishankar shared his thoughts on the discussions through a post on X. He expressed his satisfaction at meeting Rubio for their first bilateral engagement since Rubio assumed office as Secretary of State. “Reviewed our extensive bilateral partnership, of which Rubio has been a strong advocate. Also exchanged views on a wide range of regional and global issues. Look forward to closely working with him to advance our strategic cooperation,” Jaishankar wrote.

Jaishankar is currently in Washington DC on the invitation of the US government to attend the swearing-in ceremony of Donald Trump, who was inaugurated as the 47th President of the United States on Monday.

In addition to his bilateral talks with Jaishankar, Rubio also engaged in discussions with the foreign ministers of Australia and Japan—Penny Wong and Takeshi Iwaya, respectively. Following these discussions, the four nations issued a joint statement committing to regular meetings among their officials to prepare for an upcoming leaders’ summit, which is expected to take place in India later this year.

This meeting underscores the ongoing efforts to deepen the India-US strategic relationship while addressing global and regional challenges collaboratively.

House Passes Laken Riley Act: Immigration Legislation Sent to President Trump for Approval

January 25, 2025January 26, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

The House of Representatives passed the Laken Riley Act on Wednesday, delivering an immigration-focused bill to President Trump’s desk. This marks a potential legislative victory for Trump following his return to the White House earlier this week.

The bill was passed by a vote of 263-156, with 46 Democrats joining all present Republicans in support. The House’s approval followed the Senate’s bipartisan vote on Monday, where the measure was cleared by a margin of 64-35.

Trump is expected to sign the bill into law, making it the first legislation enacted during his second term. Immigration and border security have been central to Trump’s agenda and campaign messaging.

“The Laken Riley Act will now go to President Trump’s desk for him to sign into law,” said Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on social platform X. “Criminal illegal aliens must be detained, deported, and NEVER allowed back into our country. The American people demand and deserve safety and security.”

While the White House has not confirmed a signing ceremony, Trump is scheduled to leave for North Carolina on Friday.

Provisions of the Laken Riley Act

The legislation mandates the detention of a wide range of migrants without legal status, including those legally allowed into the United States to seek asylum, if they have been accused of crimes such as theft, burglary, or shoplifting.

The bill is named after Laken Riley, a nursing student from Georgia who was killed by a Venezuelan migrant previously arrested for shoplifting. This incident occurred after the individual had been paroled into the U.S.

Criticism and Concerns

The bill has drawn criticism for requiring the detention of individuals based on accusations rather than convictions. Critics argue this could lead to unjust detainment and deportation.

“Under this bill, a person who has lived in the United States for decades, say for most of her life, paid taxes and bought a home, but who is mistakenly arrested for shoplifting would not be free to resume her life, but rather would be detained and deported, even if the charges are dropped,” said House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) during earlier debates.

Legislative Journey

The passage of the bill in the House marks the culmination of months of effort by Republicans. The legislation was first approved by the House in March, shortly after Riley’s death. However, it stalled in the then-Democratic-controlled Senate.

The bill was reintroduced earlier this month as the first measure of the 119th Congress. With a Republican majority in the Senate, the legislation quickly advanced. The Senate made minor technical adjustments and added two amendments before sending it back to the House for final approval.

One amendment, introduced by Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), adds assault of a law enforcement officer to the list of crimes triggering detainment. Another amendment, known as Sarah’s Law and proposed by Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), requires the detention of migrants without legal status who are charged with crimes resulting in death or serious bodily harm. This provision honors Sarah Root, a victim of a fatal car crash in 2016 caused by a migrant who later fled the country after posting bond.

Twelve Democrats joined all Senate Republicans in passing the final version of the bill.

Dividing Democrats

The legislation has exposed divisions among Democrats, who are still grappling with the aftermath of their losses in the November elections. Immigration and border security were pivotal issues during the campaign, with polls consistently identifying these topics as top concerns for voters.

Trump frequently highlighted Riley’s case on the campaign trail, using her death to critique the Biden administration’s immigration policies. When a Georgia court sentenced Jose Ibarra, the Venezuelan migrant who killed Riley, to life in prison in November, Trump described the verdict as “justice.”

“The Illegal who killed our beloved Laken Riley was just found GUILTY on all counts for his horrific crimes,” Trump said at the time, shortly after his election victory.

Executive Actions on Immigration

Immigration remains a priority for the Trump administration. On his first day back in office, Trump issued several executive orders aimed at tightening border security and restricting migration.

One order pauses refugee admissions, while another reinstates a program that partners local law enforcement with immigration officials. Additionally, Trump declared a national emergency to allow for greater deployment of active-duty military personnel at the southern border and to allocate resources for border wall construction.

Another executive order frames migration as an “invasion” and seeks to halt asylum processing by citing public health and national security concerns.

The Path Forward

With the Laken Riley Act expected to be signed into law, Republicans view this as a significant step toward fulfilling their campaign promises on immigration. However, critics warn that the bill’s provisions may lead to human rights concerns and unintended consequences for migrants who have long been part of American society.

As immigration continues to be a contentious issue, the passage of this legislation highlights the deep divide between Republicans and Democrats on how to address border security and the treatment of migrants.

Trump’s Executive Orders: A First 3-Day Policy Blitz on Immigration, Trade, Civil Rights, and Government Efficiency

January 25, 2025January 26, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

In his first three days, President Donald Trump launched a flurry of executive orders aimed at reshaping the U.S. government across multiple sectors, reflecting his commitment to campaign promises and a rightward shift in policy. These orders span immigration, trade, civil rights, government efficiency, and climate action. While some have immediate implications, others face legal challenges, and several have symbolic significance.

Immigration and Border Security

Trump focused heavily on immigration, declaring a national emergency at the southern border, characterizing the influx of migrants as an “invasion.” His orders trigger several immediate actions, including utilizing military personnel for border enforcement—a move that could challenge the Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts military involvement in domestic law enforcement. Other directives include halting refugee arrivals, redefining birthright citizenship, prioritizing border wall construction, and revoking the “catch-and-release” practice. Trump also authorized local law enforcement to assist federal immigration enforcement and mandated DNA collection from immigration detainees. The orders aim to streamline deportations and curtail family reunification programs, setting the tone for a tough stance on immigration.

International Trade and the Economy

Trump took steps to address trade imbalances by ordering reviews of U.S. trade relations, especially with Mexico, Canada, and China. He proposed new tariffs, including a 25% tariff on Mexican and Canadian goods. He also directed the establishment of an “External Revenue Service” to handle tariffs and foreign trade revenues. Additionally, Trump suspended U.S. participation in the Global Tax Deal, aiming to protect American interests in international corporate taxation.

Climate, Energy, and Environmental Policy

In a significant move away from the Biden administration’s climate policies, Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Paris climate agreement, blocking funding for the International Climate Finance Plan. He also declared a national energy emergency to promote fossil fuel production, including streamlining permitting processes for energy projects. Trump rolled back numerous regulations aimed at reducing carbon emissions, including restrictions on fossil fuel extraction in Alaska and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. His directives signal a push for greater energy independence and a reversal of the green energy push under Biden.

Civil Rights and Transgender Rights

Trump issued orders to roll back Biden-era initiatives on racial and ethnic equity and transgender rights. The White House ordered the elimination of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, including positions like “chief diversity officer.” Trump also mandated the recognition of only male and female gender categories on government documents, ending policies that supported transgender individuals in federal programs and military service. He directed that civil rights laws be interpreted with the understanding that “sex” excludes “gender identity.”

Federal Workers and Government Efficiency

On the domestic front, Trump focused on streamlining government operations. He established the Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, to recommend cuts in federal programs and spending. Additionally, Trump froze federal hiring, with exceptions for immigration, border enforcement, and military positions. His orders also make it easier to remove, demote, or reassign senior federal employees, effectively tightening control over the federal workforce.

These executive actions highlight Trump’s goal of centralizing power within the executive branch and taking swift action on key issues. They reflect his unwavering commitment to his political base and his ambition to reshape U.S. policies on immigration, trade, civil rights, and government structure. However, many of these orders face legal hurdles and will continue to spark debates over the balance of power in the U.S. government.

Trump’s second inaugural address: Immigration, culture, and conflict

January 23, 2025January 26, 2025 William A. Galston And Elaine Kamarck At BrookingsOpinion 0

Previewing Donald Trump’s second inaugural address, several of his political advisors suggested that its tone would be gentler and its substance more unifying than was his “American Carnage” inaugural address eight years ago. They must have been misinformed as his spoken words continued to emphasize American crisis and decline and were hardly unifying or uplifting.

While there were occasional rhetorical bows toward unity, the thrust of the speech was an all-out assault on illegal immigration and on aspects of American culture loathed by social conservatives (with scant attention to any plans to bring down the cost of living, one of the issues that elected him). He wants to be a peacemaker overseas but a warrior at home. And in a speech traditionally devoted to selfless themes, President Trump spoke about the extent of his electoral victory and professed his belief that he had been saved by God to save the nation.

The speech celebrated the broadening of the Republican coalition that Trump has achieved. He praised Martin Luther King and promised that “we will strive to make his dream a reality.” To the Black and Hispanic communities, he said, “I want to thank you, we set records [measured in votes] and I will not forget it.” Absent, however, was a nod to President Biden, Vice President Harris, or any of his predecessors—or an olive branch to the 48.4% of Americans who voted for Harris.

Surprisingly, President Trump had little to say about his economic plans or efforts to tackle inflation, preferring instead to spend much of his time on the “invasion” of illegal immigrants into this country. Indeed, this was the portion of the address that was most detailed and concrete. To counter this “invasion,” Trump promised to declare a national emergency at the southern border, reinstate the remain in Mexico policy, end the practice of catch and release, send troops to the southern border, and designate cartels as foreign terrorist organizations.

In addition to the war at the southern border Trump, promised to wage a culture war, which he termed a “revolution of common sense.” Under his administration, the United States government would only recognize two genders, male and female, eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs in the government (especially in the military), and “end the practice of trying to engineer race and gender into every aspect of public life.”

Trump promised a golden age with no new overseas wars. He did not mention Russia or the war in Ukraine, but he did note his plan to expand our nation, including “increas[ing] our territory” and “[planting] the Stars and Stripes on the planet Mars.” (Elon Musk smiled broadly at this phrase.) He declared that “We didn’t give the Panama Canal to China, we gave it to Panama, and we’re taking it back.” He did not say how he would do this without starting a new war.

The newly inaugurated president used the occasion to announce two name changes. The Gulf of Mexico will henceforth be called “the Gulf of America,” and Mount Denali will revert to its name before the Obama administration—Mount McKinley. Indeed, William McKinley (who was a big fan of tariffs) seems to have replaced Andrew Jackson as Trump’s favorite president. What this portends for the fate of economic populism in the new administration is anyone’s guess. But it cannot be an accident that Trump chose to resuscitate the phrase “manifest destiny.” We will find out whether our destiny includes control of Greenland and Canada, as he has suggested.

Along with his unscripted speech later in the afternoon that talked about the stolen 2020 election and his grievances against political opponents, Trump’s second inaugural address is consistent with his campaign, in which he worked tirelessly to intensify his support rather than broaden it. If he wishes to maintain majority support, however, he must recognize that the voters who put him over the top were not fervent MAGA supporters but rather swing voters who decided that he offered a better chance than his opponent of solving specific problems, high prices for the basics of daily life first among them. If he governs as a hardliner on immigration and cultural issues, he may solidify his loyal base, but if he fails to take down high prices or restore economic hopes of upward mobility, he risks losing swing voters while reenergizing his disheartened opponents. In an era of narrow and shifting majorities, this is a risk that he ignores at his peril.

SEC’s New Leadership Forms Task Force to Revamp Crypto Regulations

January 23, 2025January 26, 2025 Staff ReporterMoney 0

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), under its new leadership, announced on Tuesday the formation of a task force dedicated to establishing a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency assets. This represents the first significant step by President Donald Trump’s administration to reshape crypto policy.

Trump, who positioned himself as a “crypto president” during his campaign, has vowed to undo what he perceives as an aggressive regulatory stance implemented by former President Joe Biden’s SEC. Under Biden’s leadership, the SEC pursued legal actions against several crypto companies, including Coinbase and Kraken, accusing them of violating SEC rules.

The accused firms have consistently denied these allegations, asserting that the current SEC regulations are unsuitable for the crypto industry. They argue that the criteria determining whether a cryptocurrency qualifies as a security, thus falling under the SEC’s jurisdiction, remain unclear. For years, industry leaders have been calling on the SEC to provide a coherent and transparent regulatory framework for digital assets.

Tuesday’s initiative, spearheaded by Republican Commissioner Mark Uyeda, recently appointed by Trump as acting SEC chair, and Commissioner Hester Peirce, signals a significant policy win for the cryptocurrency sector under the new administration.

“The Task Force’s focus will be to help the Commission draw clear regulatory lines, provide realistic paths to registration, craft sensible disclosure frameworks, and deploy enforcement resources judiciously,” Uyeda’s office stated in the announcement.

Earlier this month, Reuters reported that Uyeda and Peirce were gearing up to launch the Trump administration’s overhaul of crypto policies, including initiating the rule-making process. Additionally, reports suggest Trump may soon issue executive orders to reduce regulatory scrutiny on the crypto industry while fostering the adoption of digital assets.

Jonathan Jachym, Kraken’s global head of policy, welcomed the development, stating in an email, “We are encouraged by this meaningful first step towards real policy solutions and ending the regulation by enforcement era of the past. We look forward to accelerating our policy engagement … to establish regulatory clarity.”

Investor enthusiasm over the crypto-friendly administration led to Bitcoin reaching a record high of $109,071 on Monday.

Beyond setting regulatory boundaries, the newly established task force will assist lawmakers in drafting cryptocurrency-related legislation. It will also work in collaboration with other federal entities, such as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and coordinate with state and international agencies, according to the SEC.

Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal expressed optimism about the shift in policy. “We have been saying for years to help us by crafting rules for crypto. Over the last four years, the answer was resoundingly ‘no,’” Grewal stated in a phone interview. “It is a new day.”

Abhishek Sharma Shines as India Clinches Seven-Wicket Victory Over England in 1st T20I

January 23, 2025January 26, 2025 Staff ReporterSports 0

India secured a commanding seven-wicket win over England in the opening T20I of the five-match series in Kolkata. Chasing a modest target of 133, the hosts displayed dominance, thanks to a spectacular knock by Abhishek Sharma, who smashed 79 runs off just 34 balls. His explosive innings set the tone for India’s comfortable chase, achieved in just 12.5 overs. Sanju Samson contributed 26 runs off 20 balls, while Tilak Varma chipped in with an unbeaten 19 off 16 deliveries, ensuring a smooth finish for the team.

Abhishek’s blistering innings included a flurry of boundaries and sixes, underlining his aggressive approach. His fifty, reached in just 20 balls, places him in elite company among Indian players. He now holds the record for the second-fastest T20I fifty against England, trailing only Yuvraj Singh’s iconic 12-ball effort in Durban in 2007.

India’s chase began strongly with openers Abhishek and Samson putting together a vital partnership. The duo’s effort dismantled England’s bowling attack early on, leaving little room for a comeback. After Samson’s dismissal for 26, Abhishek carried on his onslaught, ensuring there were no hiccups in the chase. Tilak Varma’s calm presence at the crease further cemented India’s dominance.

Earlier in the game, India’s bowlers set the stage with a disciplined performance. Varun Chakravarthy emerged as the standout bowler, claiming three crucial wickets. His ability to deceive batters with his variations proved instrumental in restricting England to a below-par total.

The seamers also played a significant role, with Arshdeep Singh, Hardik Pandya, and Axar Patel picking up two wickets each. England’s batting revolved around Jos Buttler, who top-scored with a valiant 68 off 44 balls. Despite his efforts, the rest of the lineup struggled against India’s disciplined attack, with wickets falling at regular intervals.

Summarizing his team’s performance, Abhishek said, “It feels great to contribute to the team’s victory. The wicket was good for batting, and I tried to capitalize on the loose deliveries. Winning the first match of the series gives us a lot of confidence moving forward.”

This victory gives India a 1-0 lead in the series, and the team will look to build on this momentum in the upcoming matches. The second T20I is scheduled for later this week, where England will aim to bounce back and level the series.

Fastest Fifties for India Against England in T20Is (Balls Faced):

Yuvraj Singh – 12 balls (Durban, 2007)
Abhishek Sharma – 20 balls (Kolkata, 2025)
KL Rahul – 27 balls (Manchester, 2018)

India’s clinical all-round performance showcased their strength in both departments, making them the team to beat in this series. With Abhishek Sharma’s electrifying innings and the bowlers’ consistent efforts, the hosts have set the tone for an exciting series ahead.

Trump’s Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship Sparks Legal and Ethical Controversy

January 23, 2025January 26, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration 0

On his very first day in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at terminating the principle of birthright citizenship in the United States. Birthright citizenship, which ensures that any individual born on U.S. soil is a citizen, is firmly rooted in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. However, such an executive action raises serious legal and constitutional questions.

The president does not hold the authority to unilaterally revoke constitutional protections. Much like the inability to establish a national religion or extend a presidency beyond two terms, altering an amendment to the Constitution falls well beyond the scope of executive power. This move, critics argue, appears to cater to nativist factions on the far right. Despite its questionable legality, the executive order could still cause significant disruptions to millions of lives, which some suspect may be its underlying intent.

Origins of Birthright Citizenship

The principle of birthright citizenship has its roots in English common law, dating back to the 1600s. It became a fundamental element of the U.S. Constitution during the post-Civil War Reconstruction era, known as the “Second Founding.” The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments were introduced to address the profound social and legal injustices stemming from slavery.

The 14th Amendment was particularly significant. It was drafted as a direct response to the infamous 1857 Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford. That ruling declared that enslaved individuals, even those residing in free states, were not U.S. citizens and had no rights under the Constitution. The decision further inflamed tensions over slavery, contributing to the outbreak of the Civil War.

Following the war, Congress sought to eliminate the remnants of slavery and inequality through constitutional amendments. The 14th Amendment, in particular, was designed to ensure that anyone born in the United States, regardless of race or origin, would be granted citizenship. Its opening clause states unequivocally: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Legal Precedents and Limitations

History shows that even Congress cannot circumvent the 14th Amendment’s protections. About 30 years after its ratification, Congress attempted to deny citizenship to individuals born in the U.S. to Chinese parents. The Supreme Court decisively rejected this in the landmark 1898 case United States v. Wong Kim Ark, affirming that the 14th Amendment’s provisions applied to all individuals born on U.S. soil.

This clear legal precedent underscores that the president, too, lacks the authority to rewrite the Constitution through executive action. Amending the Constitution requires a rigorous process: a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate, followed by ratification by three-quarters of the states. Such a feat is exceedingly rare, reflecting the deliberate difficulty of altering the nation’s foundational document.

Political Motivations and Potential Consequences

Despite the constitutional safeguards, the push to end birthright citizenship persists. It was a cornerstone of the Project 2025 agenda, a conservative blueprint for sweeping changes in U.S. governance. While proponents argue that such changes are necessary to address immigration challenges, critics contend that this effort is a cynical ploy to undermine the principles enshrined in the Constitution.

Even though the executive order is almost certain to face legal challenges, its immediate impact could be profound. Lawsuits have already been filed by 18 state attorneys general and several cities, aiming to block its implementation. However, the possibility remains that a lower court might temporarily allow the order to take effect.

This raises troubling questions: Would the order merely apply to future births, as claimed, or could it pave the way for more drastic measures, such as stripping existing citizens of their status? Such uncertainty could create widespread fear and instability, particularly among immigrant communities.

The Supreme Court’s Role

Ultimately, the Supreme Court will likely determine the fate of the executive order. Given the court’s conservative majority, some worry that ideological leanings could influence its decision. Yet even this court would find it difficult to dismiss over 150 years of legal precedent. As the Constitution’s language on birthright citizenship is explicit and unambiguous, any attempt to reinterpret it would require extraordinary legal contortions.

Nonetheless, the lower courts’ initial rulings could embolden the administration to pursue even more aggressive actions. While the Supreme Court may eventually strike down the order, the damage inflicted during the interim could be significant. Lives could be disrupted, families torn apart, and communities plunged into uncertainty—all as part of what critics describe as a cruel and unconstitutional maneuver.

Broader Implications

The attempt to end birthright citizenship through executive action is more than a legal controversy; it is a direct challenge to the principles of equality and justice that underpin American democracy. The 14th Amendment was crafted to ensure that no person born in the United States would be denied the rights and protections of citizenship. To undermine this guarantee not only defies constitutional law but also erodes the moral fabric of the nation.

In the words of legal experts, “The Constitution protects this path to citizenship, and only an amendment can change it.” Any attempt to bypass this process, whether through executive orders or political rhetoric, threatens to destabilize the nation’s legal and social foundations.

While the Supreme Court is expected to uphold the Constitution, the mere attempt to challenge birthright citizenship has already sown fear and division. For millions of individuals, the uncertainty surrounding their citizenship status is more than a legal matter—it is a deeply personal and existential crisis.

In summary, President Trump’s executive order targeting birthright citizenship is a stark reminder of the fragile balance between political power and constitutional authority. As legal challenges unfold, the nation must grapple with the broader implications of this controversial action and reaffirm its commitment to the principles enshrined in the 14th Amendment.

Trump’s Executive Order Targets Birthright Citizenship: Implications for Indian-American Families

January 22, 2025January 23, 2025 Staff ReporterImmigration 0

President Donald Trump has introduced an executive order to limit birthright citizenship in the United States, signaling a major shift in immigration policy. The order stipulates that children born on U.S. soil will acquire citizenship only if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen, a legal permanent resident, or a member of the U.S. military. It also aims to address “birth tourism,” where foreign nationals travel to the U.S. to give birth and secure citizenship for their children.

Trump, who has consistently criticized the practice, described birthright citizenship as “ridiculous.” He stated, “We’re going to end that because it’s ridiculous,” emphasizing his broader immigration strategy to curb illegal immigration, particularly from nations like India and China, which see significant migration to the U.S.

The 14th Amendment and Current Law

Under the current interpretation of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, anyone born on U.S. soil automatically becomes a citizen, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. This provision, established in 1868, was designed to grant citizenship to all individuals born in the U.S. The executive order seeks to reinterpret this provision, excluding children born to parents who are unlawfully present or on temporary visas.

If implemented, this change would have far-reaching consequences, particularly for the Indian-American community. According to the U.S. Census, over 4.8 million Indian-Americans reside in the U.S., with many being U.S.-born. The proposed policy would mean that children born to Indian nationals on temporary work visas, such as H-1B visas or those awaiting green cards, would no longer automatically acquire citizenship.

Impacts on Indian-American Families

The executive order poses significant challenges for Indian-American families, affecting various aspects of their lives:

Loss of Automatic Citizenship: Currently, children born in the U.S. to Indian parents on H-1B or other temporary visas automatically gain citizenship. Under the new policy, only those with at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen or permanent resident would qualify. This change introduces uncertainty for families relying on birthright citizenship to secure their children’s future.
Green Card Backlog Delays: Many Indian-Americans face prolonged delays in obtaining green cards due to an extensive backlog. Children of Indian nationals on temporary visas, who would otherwise gain citizenship by birth, would now face additional hurdles. This shift could prolong the citizenship process and exacerbate family separations.
Family Reunification Challenges: Family-based immigration allows U.S. citizens to sponsor their parents to join them in the country once they turn 21. Without birthright citizenship, children born to Indian immigrants would lose this avenue, complicating family reunification efforts.
Effect on Birth Tourism: The executive order seeks to curtail birth tourism, a practice where foreign nationals come to the U.S. specifically to give birth and secure citizenship for their children. While this policy may deter such practices, it also affects families not engaged in birth tourism but dependent on birthright citizenship for their children’s residency and future opportunities.
Implications for Indian Students: Indian students represent one of the largest groups of international students in the U.S., particularly in technology and engineering fields. Under the new rules, children born to these students on F-1 or other non-immigrant visas would not automatically become citizens. This adds another layer of complexity for Indian students and their families.

Legal and Social Challenges

Trump’s executive order faces significant legal hurdles. The 14th Amendment explicitly guarantees birthright citizenship, and any reinterpretation to exclude specific groups could violate the Constitution. Legal experts and immigration advocates have widely criticized the order, arguing that it undermines fundamental American values and sets a troubling precedent.

Despite these challenges, Trump’s administration remains steadfast in its goal to implement the order. The president has framed the move as a necessary step to curb illegal immigration and address abuses of the system, such as birth tourism. However, the order’s broader implications raise concerns about its impact on immigrant families and communities, particularly those already contributing significantly to U.S. society.

Impact on Indian-American Community

The Indian-American community, one of the fastest-growing immigrant populations in the U.S., faces considerable uncertainty under the proposed changes. Indian nationals on temporary work visas, like the H-1B, and those awaiting green cards are particularly vulnerable. The loss of automatic citizenship for their U.S.-born children could deter highly skilled professionals from pursuing opportunities in the U.S., ultimately affecting the nation’s economy.

Moreover, the policy risks creating long-term social and emotional challenges for families separated by immigration status. Parents and children caught in the legal and bureaucratic complexities of the U.S. immigration system may face significant stress and uncertainty about their futures.

Conclusion

President Trump’s executive order targeting birthright citizenship represents a seismic shift in U.S. immigration policy. While the move is aimed at curbing illegal immigration and addressing birth tourism, it poses significant challenges for immigrant communities, particularly Indian-Americans. The legal battle over the 14th Amendment’s interpretation is likely to shape the future of immigration policy in the U.S., with profound implications for families, communities, and the nation’s values. As the debate continues, the voices of affected families and communities will be critical in shaping the outcome of this contentious issue.

Billionaire Wealth Surges in 2024 as Inequality Deepens, Oxfam Reports

January 22, 2025January 23, 2025 Staff ReporterBusiness, Money 0

A recent report by Oxfam, titled Takers Not Makers, has revealed a dramatic increase in billionaire wealth in 2024, sparking concerns over widening global inequality. According to the report, billionaire fortunes surged by an astounding $2 trillion last year, which equates to an astonishing $5.7 billion per day. This pace of wealth accumulation is three times faster than the previous year, intensifying the disparity between the world’s richest and poorest populations.

Oxfam warns that the current trajectory could result in the world having at least five trillionaires within a decade. At the same time, nearly half the global population—approximately 3.5 billion people—continues to live in poverty. The World Bank has reported a stagnation in poverty reduction, a troubling trend not seen since 1990.

Unequal Wealth Growth in the UK

The United Kingdom has witnessed a significant spike in billionaire wealth in 2024. Combined wealth among UK billionaires grew by £35 million ($44 million) per day, reaching a total of £182 billion ($231 billion). To put this into perspective, this amount of money could cover the city of Manchester in £10 notes nearly 1.5 times.

The number of billionaires in the UK also increased, with four new individuals joining the ranks, bringing the total to 57. However, this wealth accumulation comes with concerns. Oxfam highlights that the UK has the highest proportion of billionaire wealth generated through monopolistic practices and cronyism among G7 nations. Specifically, 37% of UK billionaire wealth is linked to cronyism, while 15% stems from monopolistic ventures.

On a global scale, Oxfam’s report estimates that 60% of billionaire wealth is rooted in inheritance, monopoly power, or crony connections between the wealthy elite and governments. The analysis further notes that many European billionaires owe parts of their fortunes to historical colonial exploitation, which Oxfam describes as a form of “modern-day colonialism.”

Global South Faces Economic Exploitation

The Oxfam report sheds light on the persistent economic exploitation of the Global South, which continues to serve as the labor backbone for the global economy. According to the findings, 90% of the labor that drives the global economy comes from the Global South, yet workers in these regions receive a mere 21% of the global income.

Moreover, $30 million per hour is extracted from the Global South through financial systems that disproportionately benefit wealthier nations such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. These systems exacerbate inequality, as low- and middle-income countries are burdened by debt repayments that consume nearly half of their national budgets.

Between 1970 and 2023, governments in the Global South paid an eye-watering $3.3 trillion in interest to creditors in the Global North. Much of this money flowed to financial hubs like London and New York, perpetuating the cycle of wealth extraction from poorer nations.

Alarming Implications

Oxfam’s report underscores the urgent need for structural changes to tackle the growing wealth gap. The organization emphasizes the role of monopolies, inheritance, and cronyism in perpetuating billionaire wealth while leaving billions of people in poverty. The findings also draw attention to the historical and ongoing economic exploitation of the Global South, highlighting the stark disparity between those who contribute to the global economy and those who reap its benefits.

As global inequality deepens, the report serves as a stark reminder of the pressing need for policies that promote economic fairness and reduce the concentration of wealth among a small elite.

Trump Sworn in as 47th U.S. President, Vows to Reverse America’s Decline and Bring Change

January 21, 2025January 23, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

Donald Trump has been officially sworn in as the 47th President of the United States by Chief Justice John Roberts, marking a dramatic political return after his felony convictions. His running mate, JD Vance, took the oath of office administered by Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

In his inauguration speech, Trump declared that “the golden age of America begins right now.” The new administration is preparing to implement numerous executive actions, including efforts to end birthright citizenship and declaring a national emergency regarding the U.S.-Mexico border, according to incoming White House sources. Additionally, sources informed CNN that Trump plans to pardon some individuals involved in the January 6 riots on his first day in office.

The inauguration event was attended by a broad spectrum of political figures, former presidents, and influential billionaires like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos. Country music sensation Carrie Underwood performed “America the Beautiful” at the event. The world was able to tune in to the proceedings via various media platforms.

In the lead-up to the inauguration, outgoing President Joe Biden took a significant step by issuing pardons for key individuals. These included General Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and members of Congress who had been involved in investigating the January 6 events. Biden also granted preemptive pardons to his family members, including his brothers James and Frank, his sister Valerie, and their spouses.

Trump took the opportunity in his speech to reflect on his personal journey and the significance of his victory. In particular, he referenced a moment of personal reflection tied to an assassination attempt during his campaign. “My life was saved by the grace of God to make America great again,” Trump said, evoking religious imagery. This sentiment was shared by many of his supporters, who believed his survival of the assassination attempt was a divine sign.

Trump further characterized Inauguration Day, January 20, 2025, as “liberation day,” emphasizing the hope that the presidential election would be remembered as “the greatest and most consequential election in the history of our country.” He argued that his victory marked a broad and rapidly growing unity among the American people. “The entire nation is rapidly unifying behind our agenda with dramatic increases in support from virtually every element of our society,” he stated.

Acknowledging the diverse coalition that helped propel him to victory, Trump expressed gratitude toward Black and Hispanic voters. He thanked them for the “tremendous outpouring of love and trust that you have shown me with your vote.” He vowed to remember this support, saying, “We set records and I will not forget it. I’ve heard your voices on the campaign, and I look forward to working with you in the years to come.”

Trump also addressed the recent devastation caused by wildfires in Los Angeles, where numerous homes were destroyed. These fires, exacerbated by high winds, affected not only the general public but also some of the “wealthiest and most powerful” individuals in the country. “They’re raging through the houses and communities, even affecting some of the wealthiest and most powerful individuals in our country, some of whom are sitting here right now. They don’t have a home any longer,” Trump remarked. Despite the loss, he underscored the importance of preventing further tragedies, stating, “That’s interesting. But we can’t let this happen.”

In another portion of his speech, Trump criticized the Biden administration, which was present at the inauguration, for its handling of domestic and international challenges. “We now have a government that cannot manage a simple crisis at home while at the same time stumble into a continuing catalog of catastrophic events abroad,” he claimed. He also expressed frustration over immigration policies, asserting that the government had “failed to protect our magnificent law-abiding citizens but proves sanctuary and protection for dangerous criminals.” Trump continued, emphasizing the disparity in border protection efforts: “We have a government that has given unlimited funding to the defense of foreign borders but refuses to defend American borders or, more importantly, its own people.”

Trump highlighted his commitment to ending what he described as America’s ongoing decline, particularly in sectors like education and healthcare. He vowed to reverse the current trajectory swiftly: “All of this will change starting today, and it will change very quickly,” he said. His victory, he asserted, was a mandate to undo “a horrible betrayal” of the American people. “From this moment on, America’s decline is over,” Trump declared, signaling his intention to enact sweeping reforms.

As the 47th president, Trump expressed optimism and confidence about the future. He promised to lead the country into “a thrilling new era of national success” and emphasized that “a tide of change is sweeping the country.” Reflecting on the opportunities before the nation, he said, “Sunlight is pouring over the entire world and America has the chance to seize this opportunity like never before.” His words were an indication of his hope to restore American greatness and assert the country’s place on the world stage.

With his inaugural speech, Trump set the tone for his presidency, stressing the need for immediate change and national unity. From addressing the wildfires to criticizing the previous administration, he laid out an ambitious agenda aimed at reasserting American values and interests. As the nation looks forward to the new administration, Trump’s bold promises will serve as a framework for the first term of his presidency.

The inauguration of President Donald Trump marks the beginning of a new chapter in American politics, characterized by promises of national revitalization and a determination to reverse the country’s perceived decline. His speech touched on various themes, from personal reflections to critiques of the previous administration, and outlined his vision for the future. With a strong emphasis on unity and restoration, Trump’s presidency begins with a clear sense of direction, ready to implement the changes he campaigned on.

Vivek Ramaswamy to Leave Department of Government Efficiency Role as He Plans Ohio Governor Campaign

January 21, 2025January 23, 2025 Staff ReporterProfile 0

Vivek Ramaswamy, who was appointed by President-elect Donald Trump to co-lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) alongside entrepreneur Elon Musk, is expected to step down from his position shortly, according to CBS News. Multiple sources confirmed that Ramaswamy intends to announce his candidacy for Ohio governor by the end of January.

At 39 years old, Ramaswamy did not offer any public comment on the matter.

According to individuals familiar with the situation, Ramaswamy’s tenure within the task force has been fraught with challenges. Some people close to Musk have expressed dissatisfaction with Ramaswamy’s minimal involvement in critical tasks, and tensions have been building between him and the rank-and-file members of the DOGE team. These sources suggest that Ramaswamy has received indirect encouragement to leave the initiative.

“Vivek has worn out his welcome,” a source close to Trump shared.

Ramaswamy recently met with Ohio’s current governor, Mike DeWine, regarding the vacant Senate seat left by Vice President-elect JD Vance. However, DeWine declared on Friday that he would appoint his lieutenant governor to the Senate position.

Ramaswamy, who had sought the GOP nomination in 2024, spent time at Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s estate in West Palm Beach, Florida, during the transition period. According to sources, Ramaswamy and Musk were spotted together at the bar, jotting down plans for DOGE on a napkin. However, it seems their collaboration has dwindled in recent times, with sources noting that they have not worked closely together for a while.

Politico was the first to report Ramaswamy’s possible departure from the DOGE task force.

In the political sphere, Ramaswamy has been vocal about cultural issues, especially criticizing what he perceives as the rise of “woke” policies that he believes are being imposed on institutions within corporate, academic, and government sectors. Even when running against Trump for the GOP nomination, Ramaswamy refrained from criticizing the former president and was quick to offer praise.

Despite its ambitious title, the Department of Government Efficiency is not expected to function as a formal federal agency. Trump has stated that DOGE’s role will be to provide external guidance and advice, working in collaboration with the White House and the Office of Management and Budget.

According to Trump, the objective of DOGE is to streamline the federal bureaucracy, reduce government spending, and reorganize federal agencies. Trump has set a deadline for the department’s work to be completed by July 2026.

Ramaswamy’s background before entering the political arena includes attending Yale Law School alongside JD Vance. He also gained substantial wealth as a hedge fund manager and through the sale of his stake in a biotechnology company he co-founded.

Donald Trump’s Second Presidency Begins with Bold Moves, Controversy, and Power Plays

January 21, 2025January 22, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

On Monday, Donald Trump launched his second term with swift and sweeping actions, aiming to redefine his presidency while addressing his previous term’s shortcomings. Proclaiming the dawn of a “Golden Age” for America, Trump quickly consolidated his authority, implementing measures that targeted Joe Biden’s legacy and signaling an aggressive approach to governance.

Within hours, he pardoned hundreds of January 6 rioters, initiated stringent immigration reforms, and solidified alliances with influential tech leaders. His unorthodox foreign policy decisions sent ripples through global capitals, underscoring a dramatic pivot from the internationalism championed by most presidents since World War II.

In a press conference at the Oval Office, Trump showcased a confident, decisive demeanor, drawing on lessons from his first term to maximize his control over executive powers. However, alongside ambitious goals and bold rhetoric, Trump’s actions were accompanied by grievances, misinformation, and a growing sense of self-importance, raising concerns about his commitment to democratic principles.

The day’s rapid sequence of events, including the issuance of numerous executive orders, hinted at looming legal battles. Despite the theatrics, Trump’s agenda faces challenges, with new legislation requiring cooperation from a narrowly Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Without such legislative backing, many of his actions could be reversed by the next administration, much like his dismantling of Biden-era policies.

Pardons for January 6 Rioters

In a polarizing move, Trump issued blanket pardons to approximately 1,500 individuals convicted or accused of crimes during the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack. These pardons extended to high-profile members of extremist groups like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, erasing distinctions between violent offenders and those guilty of lesser charges.

This act underscored Trump’s willingness to shield his supporters from legal consequences, even at the cost of undermining democratic norms. Critics warned this could embolden future acts of political violence. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi denounced the move, stating, “Trump’s actions are an outrageous insult to our justice system and the heroes who suffered physical scars and emotional trauma as they protected the Capitol, the Congress, and the Constitution.”

Biden’s Preemptive Pardons

Trump wasn’t the only president accused of misusing pardon power. Before leaving office, Biden issued blanket pardons to officials such as Dr. Anthony Fauci, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, and members of the House committee investigating January 6. Biden justified these actions as necessary protections against Trump’s threats of retribution.

Additionally, Biden preemptively pardoned several family members, including his brothers and sister, claiming it was to safeguard their reputations. Critics argued this expanded the potential misuse of presidential pardon power, setting a dangerous precedent. Trump seized on this development, remarking, “Now every president, when they leave office, they are going to pardon everyone they met.”

Immigration Overhaul

Trump moved swiftly on immigration, declaring an emergency at the southern border, ending the use of an app facilitating legal migrant entry, and initiating efforts to terminate birthright citizenship. He also suspended refugee resettlement for four months and dismissed senior Justice Department officials overseeing immigration courts.

While his actions aimed to fulfill campaign promises, they also set the stage for constitutional and legal challenges. Trump’s broader vision for mass deportations requires congressional approval, highlighting the limitations of executive orders in enacting lasting policy changes.

Rolling Back Diversity Policies

Fulfilling another campaign promise, Trump revoked Biden’s executive orders protecting against discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation. Federal diversity programs were also dismantled, with changes extending to documentation requirements, such as passports and visas reflecting applicants’ biological sex.

These actions catered to Trump’s base but risked alienating many Americans who viewed such policies as steps backward in civil rights.

Tech Titans Join Trump’s Inner Circle

Trump’s inaugural celebrations prominently featured Silicon Valley leaders, marking a shift in allegiance from Democrats to his administration. Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Tim Cook, Sundar Pichai, and Mark Zuckerberg attended events and appeared alongside Trump, signaling their willingness to collaborate with his government.

Musk, who received significant federal contracts, was even appointed to lead a newly established Department of Government Efficiency. While Trump argued that leveraging tech pioneers was in America’s interest, their proximity to power raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the influence of tech giants on public discourse.

Shaking Global Norms

Trump’s return to power reverberated across the globe. In his first press conference, he demanded NATO allies increase defense spending to 5% of GDP—a nearly unattainable goal for many nations. He also reignited tensions over the Panama Canal, falsely claiming, “China is operating the Panama Canal and we didn’t give it to China. We gave it to Panama and we’re taking it back.”

Additionally, Trump labeled Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations and hinted at deploying special forces into Mexico—a proposal fraught with diplomatic and security risks. On Ukraine, he increased pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin to negotiate peace, asserting, “The war does not make him look very good.”

Economic and Trade Policies

While Trump refrained from immediately imposing new tariffs, he confirmed plans to introduce 25% duties on Mexican and Canadian imports starting February 1, risking a trade conflict within North America. Although tariffs on China remain unimplemented, Trump hinted at using them as leverage in upcoming negotiations.

Trump’s assertion that tariffs would generate significant revenue for the U.S. was misleading, as their costs are typically borne by American consumers. Potential inflationary effects and rising prices for essentials like food and fuel could pose challenges to his administration’s economic agenda.

Challenges Ahead

Despite a dramatic start, Trump’s second term faces significant hurdles. His reliance on executive orders underscores his difficulty in securing legislative support, a necessity for long-lasting reforms. Additionally, his tendency toward grievance politics and self-promotion could distract from meaningful governance.

The widespread pardons and sweeping policy changes highlight Trump’s determination to reshape America, but they also risk deepening divisions and eroding democratic norms. As he seeks to solidify his legacy, the success of his presidency will hinge on balancing bold ambitions with the practicalities of governance.

By the end of his first day back in office, Trump had cemented his reputation as a disruptor, willing to challenge conventions and push the boundaries of presidential power. However, whether this approach can deliver sustained progress or merely provoke further polarization remains to be seen.

A Grand Centennial Tribute to Raj Kapoor in New Jersey Draws Over 500 Fans

January 21, 2025January 22, 2025 Staff ReporterCinema 0

On January 12, more than 500 fans of Indian cinema gathered at Royal Albert’s Palace in Fords, New Jersey, to pay tribute to the legendary Raj Kapoor. The Centennial Tribute, organized by AUM Events and South Asian Culture, Heritage & Arts (SACHA), was a four-hour celebration featuring 25 performers delivering 50 timeless solo and duet performances that honored Kapoor’s remarkable legacy in Indian cinema.

The event began with a live performance by Girish Joshi, a dedicated admirer of Raj Kapoor. Dressed as Kapoor’s iconic character from Mera Naam Joker, Joshi performed two songs from the film, captivating the audience and earning a resounding round of applause.

Edison Township Mayor Sam Joshi attended the tribute to show his support and commended the Indian community for enriching the local culture. “Events like these showcase the rich cultural heritage and vibrant spirit of our community,” the mayor remarked, acknowledging the significance of the event.

Jayesh Mehta, leader of SACHA, spoke about the efforts behind organizing the tribute. “We auditioned over 100 singers and selected the best 25,” Mehta explained. “Rehearsals involving costumes and choreography were held for over a month to ensure a flawless tribute to the greatest showman of Indian cinema.”

The performers, who came from varied professions and backgrounds, included renowned singers such as Amit Macwan, Annette D’Souza, and Sanjay Shah. The event was hosted by Dr. Tushar Patel, a prominent community activist and music enthusiast, who served as the Master of Ceremonies. Several individuals contributed to the event’s success, including video producer Mukesh Kashiwala, audio engineers Nikul Shah and Pratik Shah, and Dr. Dinesh Patel, who played significant roles in ensuring a seamless evening.

The tribute highlighted the enduring legacy of Raj Kapoor, a cinematic icon whose works such as Aag, Barsaat, Awara, Shree 420, and Mera Naam Joker remain classics. Kapoor’s career began at the young age of 11 as an actor, and he ventured into filmmaking by 24. His contributions to Indian cinema earned him prestigious accolades, including the Padma Bhushan in 1971 and the Dada Saheb Phalke Award in 1987.

Reflecting on the event, Dr. Tushar Patel stated, “Raj Kapoor’s work transcends time and geography. This tribute is not just about his films but about the emotions and stories that continue to inspire generations.”

Attendees enjoyed a nostalgic journey through Kapoor’s cinematic achievements, reliving moments from his films that have touched countless lives. The evening concluded with special recognitions for standout performers, leaving attendees with a sense of admiration for the rich cultural and cinematic legacy of Raj Kapoor.

Prominent community figures supported the tribute, including Mr. Albert Jasani of Royal Albert’s Palace, entrepreneur Pinakin Pathak, and other notable sponsors. Their contributions underscored the collective effort to celebrate Kapoor’s impact on Indian cinema and beyond.

The event featured performances by Amit Macwan, Annette D’Souza, Anuj Govilla, Atul Shah, Deepali Khaparde, Gautam Shah, Gopal Mehta, Hari Neelakantan, Hema Patel, Hina Patel, Kavita Shah, Kinnari Patel, Krishna Narielwala, Kuldeep Chaudhary, Dr. Madan Patel, Naren Patel, Pinakin Pathak, Purvi Macwan, Raj Macwan, Raj Masrani, Raj Parikh, Sanjay Shah, Sheena Bhatia, Shruti Devi, Tushar Patel, and Varuna Taroll.

This Centennial Tribute reaffirmed Raj Kapoor’s status as a timeless icon of Indian cinema, whose legacy continues to inspire artists and audiences around the globe.

Donald Trump Sworn In As The 47th US President

January 20, 2025January 21, 2025 Ajay GhoshWorld, USA 0

“The golden age of America begins right now,” declared Donald Trump in his inaugural address on January 20, 2025, immediately after he was sworn in as the 47th president of the United States. Trump said the US would “flourish and be respected” under his leadership. Trump is taking charge of the world’s most powerful nation, even as the Republicans claim unified control of Washington and setting out to reshape the country’s institutions.

Trump was sworn in by Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court John Roberts, marking a political comeback after being convicted of felonies. His running mate, JD Vance, was sworn in by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The ceremony was moved inside to the U.S. Capitol Rotunda because of frigid weather for only the first time since Ronald Reagan’s second inauguration 40 years ago.

Photos of the swearing-in show Trump with his hand at his side, not on the Bible, as has been a long held tradition. Using a Bible during the presidential oath is traditional but not required; only the oath is mandated by the Constitution. Theodore Roosevelt, John Quincy Adams, and Lyndon B. Johnson did not use a Bible for their oaths.

The high-profile, solemn ceremony was attended by, among others, Tech billionaires, including Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, cabinet nominees, and former presidents, who were all at the ceremony in the rotunda of the US Capitol. Country music star Carrie Underwood performed “America the Beautiful.”

President Donald Trump claimed today, January 20, 2025, is “liberation day.” He went on to state that, “It is my hope that our recent presidential election will be remembered as the greatest and most consequential election in the history of our country.” Trump added that his presidential victory showed that “the entire nation is rapidly unifying behind our agenda with dramatic increases in support from virtually every element of our society.”

Inauguration ceremony for Trump's second presidential term — Photo Credit: Reuters

He went on to thank Black and Hispanic voters for “the tremendous outpouring of love and trust that you have shown me with your vote. We set records and I will not forget it,” the president said. “I’ve heard your voices on the campaign, and I look forward to working with you in the years to come.”

In his inaugural address Trump slammed the Biden administration — as former President Joe Biden sat steps away — for failing to “manage simple crisis at home. We now have a government that cannot manage a simple crisis at home while at the same time stumble into a continuing catalog of catastrophic events abroad,” Trump said.

Per reports, Trump is expected to sign an executive order declaring that the federal government would recognize only two genders as well as a series of orders aimed at remaking America’s immigration policies, including ending asylum access, sending troops to the southern border and ending birthright citizenship.

Focusing on immigration, a major focus of his new administration, Trump said, the government “fails to protect our magnificent law-abiding citizens but proves sanctuary and protection for dangerous criminals. We have a government that has given unlimited funding to the defense of foreign borders but refuses to defend American borders or, more importantly, its own people.”

Hours before the change in US leadership, President Joe Biden issued pardons for Gen. Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and members of Congress who served on the committee investigating January 6. He also issued preemptive pardons for his brothers, James and Frank, his sister Valerie, and their spouses.

A coalition of veterans, public health professionals, teachers, and consumer advocates has filed a federal lawsuit against Trump’s special commission on government efficiency. Filed after Trump’s swearing-in, the suit seeks an injunction against the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. It claims Trump is not complying with federal transparency laws and argues that private commission activities must be public. Trump mentioned DOGE, led by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, in his inauguration speech.

Rabbi Ari Berman, president of Yeshiva University, delivered the first benediction after Trump’s inaugural address. He is the second Orthodox rabbi to do so at a presidential inauguration. The tradition of clergy offering prayers at inaugurations dates back to President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s second inauguration in 1937. Rev. Lorenzo Sewell, pastor of 180 Church Detroit, delivered the second benediction, expressing gratitude for the “millimeter miracle” given to the 45th and 47th presidents.

Trump’s Unfulfilled Promises

Ordinarily, presidents wait until they are in the Oval Office before breaking campaign promises. However, Donald Trump began this process before Inauguration Day. As a candidate, Trump promised to lower grocery prices. As president-elect, he acknowledged that achieving this goal would be “very hard” and expressed uncertainty about his ability to do so.

Trump had claimed that Elon Musk would find ways to cut “at least $2 trillion” from the federal budget. As president-elect, his GOP megadonor publicly stated that the $2 trillion figure was more of a “best-case outcome” than a realistic goal, though there might still be a “good shot” at achieving half of it.

Perhaps most notably, Trump asserted during his campaign that he would successfully broker an end to Russia’s war in Ukraine within 24 hours, even during his transition period. He reiterated this promise during his presidential debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, assuring Americans that “I will get it settled before I even become president.”

Despite these assurances, as Trump prepares to return to the White House, it is evident that this promise remains unfulfilled. Nearly three years after Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the war, Europe’s worst since World War II, continues with no end in sight. The New York Times published an analysis noting that Trump “not only has failed to keep his promise; he has also made no known serious effort to resolve the war since his election in November.”

In summary, the president-elect did not attempt to honor his commitment. This was not merely a one-time statement; according to data published by NOTUS, Trump told voters on 33 occasions that he would end the conflict within one day. A recent Reuters report added that the president-elect’s team now concedes “that the Ukraine war will take months or even longer to resolve, a sharp reality check on his biggest foreign policy promise.”

A New Beginning in 2025

Trump’s second inaugural speech today marked a major departure from his tone the first time he took the Oath of Office in 2017, when Trump put aside the typical optimism and promises of unity with a dark portrait of national life as he spoke of “American Carnage.” He had declared then, “From this day forward, a new vision will govern our land. From this moment on, it’s going to be America first.”

However, today, Trump portrayed himself in a positive manner. “Many people thought it was impossible for me to stage such a historic political comeback, but as you see here today, here I am,” Trump said in his inaugural address in 2025. “I stand before you now as proof that you should never believe that something is impossible to do in America,” he went on, adding: “In America, the impossible is what we do best.”

Relief Amid Ruin: Freed Palestinians and the Complex Aftermath of War

January 20, 2025January 21, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

The release of Palestinian detainees by Israel brought mixed emotions, with joy for their newfound freedom overshadowed by sorrow over the devastation in Gaza. Khalida Jarrar, 62, one of the most prominent individuals released, captured this duality. A leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a secular leftist group known for its militant activities in the 1970s, Jarrar had been detained under administrative detention since late 2023. This controversial practice allows Israel to hold individuals indefinitely without formal charges.

Expressing her emotions, Jarrar told The Associated Press, “There’s this double feeling we’re living in, on the one hand, this feeling of freedom, that we thank everyone for, and on the other hand, this pain, of losing so many Palestinian martyrs.”

The individuals released had been detained for various offenses that Israel deemed security-related. These ranged from throwing stones and inciting violence on social media to severe allegations like attempted murder.

Meanwhile, aerial footage revealed the extensive damage in Khan Younis, a city in the Gaza Strip. After 15 months of conflict between Israel and Hamas, vast areas of Gaza were reduced to rubble. Neighborhoods stood in ruin, with charred buildings and piles of debris stretching as far as the eye could see.

The next phase of hostages and detainees is set for release on Saturday. In just over two weeks, discussions will begin on the more challenging aspects of the ceasefire agreement.

“Joy Mixed with Pain”

In Gaza, there was a collective sigh of relief as the ceasefire brought a temporary halt to Israeli bombardments. According to Gaza’s Health Ministry, the conflict has claimed over 46,000 Palestinian lives, with women and children constituting more than half of the fatalities. The statistics, however, do not distinguish between civilians and fighters.

For the first time since a week-long ceasefire in November 2023, the skies above Gaza were devoid of Israeli warplanes. This brief pause allowed Palestinians to reflect on the magnitude of the destruction.

“This ceasefire was a joy mixed with pain,” said Rami Nofal, a displaced resident of Gaza City, whose son was killed in an Israeli airstrike.

As celebrations broke out, triumphant Hamas militants appeared in some gatherings, where crowds chanted in their favor. Hamas-run police, absent during months of bombardment, also reemerged.

Amid the celebrations, some families began their journey back to what was once home, carrying their belongings on donkey carts. In Rafah, a southern city, residents encountered widespread devastation. Many likened the scenes to apocalyptic horror films, with some finding human remains in the ruins.

“It’s like what you see in a Hollywood horror movie,” said Mohamed Abu Taha, surveying the remnants of his family’s home.

Divisions in Israel Over the Ceasefire

While Gaza’s residents grappled with destruction, the scenes of Hamas gunmen celebrating openly in Gaza’s streets deepened divisions within Israel about the ceasefire deal.

Asher Pizem, 35, a resident of Sderot, voiced his concerns, saying the agreement only delayed another confrontation with Hamas. He also criticized Israel for allowing aid to enter Gaza, fearing it would strengthen the militant group.

“They will take the time and attack again,” he said, watching Gaza’s smoldering ruins from a hill in southern Israel with other residents. In the final moments before the ceasefire took effect, warplanes, helicopters, and drones dominated the skies.

The Immense Toll of War

The war’s toll has been staggering, with new revelations about its impact continuing to emerge. Residents of northern Gaza reported that Israeli forces had begun withdrawing from some areas as part of the ceasefire agreement.

Gaza’s population has endured immense hardship, with 90% displaced by the conflict. If the ceasefire holds and leads to a broader end to hostilities, rebuilding the enclave could take years.

Humanitarian aid is expected to increase significantly, with hundreds of trucks entering Gaza daily—far more than Israel allowed before.

“This is a moment of tremendous hope,” said Tom Fletcher, the U.N. humanitarian chief. “Fragile, yet vital.”

Despite the respite, the path ahead is fraught with challenges. The destruction in Gaza will require monumental reconstruction efforts, and the future of the ceasefire remains uncertain. Still, for many, this fragile pause offers a glimmer of hope amidst the devastation.

Biden’s Final Farewell: A Reflective End to a Half-Century Political Journey

January 19, 2025January 21, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

As President Joe Biden delivered his farewell addresses to his diplomatic corps, military leaders, and the nation, the scene contrasted sharply with the vision he had for the end of his political career. After over 50 years in Washington, Biden’s departure on Monday is marked by reluctance, as he firmly believes he had more to contribute. However, questions about his health and vitality linger.

Biden’s record in office is a mixture of achievements and lingering frustrations. His political career’s conclusion has left him estranged from some former allies who urged him to step aside. Many Democrats blame him for paving the way for Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Furthermore, his relationship with Vice President Kamala Harris has become strained, adding complexity to his final days in office.

As Biden departs Washington on his helicopter, the city he leaves behind is now under the control of his rival Trump. Biden’s ambition to solidify his legacy as the leader who vanquished Trump once and for all has given way to a more somber reality. Instead of being remembered as a transformative statesman, Biden fears he will be seen as an interim figure between two Trump administrations.

“While my term in office is ending, the work continues,” Biden said during a speech to mayors on Friday, signaling hope for the future while reflecting on his presidency.

A Term Defined by Highs and Lows

Biden’s presidency was eventful, defined by significant challenges and mixed outcomes. He guided the nation out of a devastating pandemic but faced criticism for the inflation that followed, partly fueled by his stimulus spending. Although he ended Trump-era immigration policies deemed inhumane, the surge in illegal crossings and the eventual reinstatement of some restrictions sparked backlash.

In foreign policy, Biden made the historic decision to withdraw U.S. forces from Afghanistan, ending the nation’s longest war. However, the chaotic and deadly withdrawal left a lasting stain on his administration. The war in Ukraine saw renewed alliances with Western nations, but the conflict continues with no clear resolution. In the Middle East, Biden brokered a last-minute ceasefire in Gaza, but critics noted Trump’s role in securing the deal.

Domestically, Biden’s investments in infrastructure and manufacturing created thousands of jobs, fostering new industries. Yet, as Biden himself acknowledged, “It will take time to feel the full impact of all we’ve done together. But the seeds are planted, and they’ll grow and they’ll bloom for decades to come.”

A Legacy of Contradictions

Biden’s efforts to restore normalcy to the presidency after Trump’s tumultuous years were overshadowed by decisions such as pardoning his son, Hunter. Despite criticism, he remains hopeful that history will ultimately recognize the merits of his administration.

During a 19-minute farewell address from the Oval Office, Biden emphasized the long-term impact of his presidency rather than listing immediate accomplishments. He also warned against the rise of a “tech-industrial complex” that he believes threatens democratic institutions. Critics, however, noted his reliance on financial support from billionaires, including those in Silicon Valley and Wall Street.

“He’s forever frustrated we didn’t tell a good enough story about what the administration did,” a senior White House official remarked, highlighting Biden’s concerns about how his achievements were communicated to the public.

Biden’s allies remain optimistic about his legacy. “I think historians are not gonna be dealing with sound bites… They’re going to deal with the substance, and on substance, I think you’re going to find that Joe Biden is going to be treated very, very well,” said Rep. Jim Clyburn of South Carolina.

Strained Dynamics with Harris

As Biden’s presidency concludes, his comments about the election have strained his relationship with Kamala Harris. Biden has suggested in private conversations and interviews that he could have defeated Trump had he not been pressured to step aside. “It’s presumptuous to say that, but I think yes, based on the polling,” Biden told USA Today. However, polling data offered no such indication.

Every mention of Biden’s belief that he could have won is seen as a slight against Harris, who ultimately failed to defeat Trump. A former Harris adviser noted, “It’s a sign of disrespect whether he intends it or not.”

Although Biden has not directly criticized Harris, his remarks have caused friction within the Democratic Party. Harris’ supporters have expressed frustration over her unwavering loyalty to Biden during her campaign, with one former adviser commenting, “She was loyal to her detriment.”

The tension between Biden and Harris became evident when Biden modified his language after a conversation with Harris about his election comments. “I think I would have beaten Trump, could’ve beaten Trump,” Biden said. “I think Kamala could have beaten Trump, would have beaten Trump.” While the adjustment aimed to acknowledge Harris’ efforts, it further frustrated her supporters.

Despite these tensions, Harris has maintained a public show of unity with Biden. In the final days of their partnership, she stood by his side during key moments, including the announcement of the Middle East ceasefire deal and his farewell address from the Oval Office.

Reflecting on the Road Ahead

Biden’s departure from public office marks the end of a remarkable political career. As the nation’s youngest senator in 1972 and its oldest president, Biden is set to enter private life while remaining engaged in public discourse. “I’m not going to be out of sight or out of mind,” he assured reporters.

Biden’s post-presidency plans include raising funds for a presidential library and potentially writing a book. His legacy, however, remains a topic of debate. Democratic leaders have expressed a desire to move past the 2024 election losses. “This is our reality, and we have to move forward,” said Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove of California.

Harris, 22 years younger than Biden, faces a different set of challenges. Many believe her political career is far from over, with possibilities ranging from a 2026 bid for California governor to a 2028 presidential campaign. “It is not my nature to go quietly into the night,” Harris told staffers, signaling her intent to remain active in politics.

A Complicated Legacy

As Biden and Harris part ways, their final days reflect the divergent paths they will take. Biden’s focus will shift to solidifying his legacy and ensuring his contributions are recognized. Harris, on the other hand, must navigate the challenges of shaping her own political future.

For Biden, the hope remains that time will provide a more favorable assessment of his presidency. “The seeds are planted,” he said, “and they’ll grow and they’ll bloom for decades to come.” Whether those seeds bear fruit as he hopes, only history will tell.

Ceasefire Agreement in Gaza Faces Challenges, US Envoy Highlights Ongoing Efforts

January 18, 2025January 21, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

The recently brokered ceasefire and hostage release agreement between Israel and Hamas marks a significant milestone, but its successful implementation still requires substantial effort, according to U.S. officials. The truce, designed to facilitate the phased release of hostages and Palestinian detainees, has garnered attention for its complexity and the diplomatic efforts involved.

Amos Hochstein, a U.S. envoy, emphasized the arduous negotiations that led to this deal. Speaking with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, he described the process as “hard fought” and praised the U.S. negotiating team for their diligence. “The hostages will start to come home in a couple of days,” Hochstein noted. He added, “There’sa very large task of implementation and getting to phase two. Sothere’s a lot of work still to be done. But this is a huge milestone.”

Hochstein refrained from assigning political credit for the agreement, though he acknowledged President Joe Biden’s strategic move to involve Steve Witkoff, an ally of President-elect Donald Trump, in the negotiations. This decision demonstrated a unified American approach, according to Hochstein. “The only thing that President Biden wanted to achieve until the last minute was to get the hostages home and stop the carnage in this crisis,” he stated. “Ultimately, the most important thing is that these hostages are going to come home on Sunday or latest Monday morning.”

Deal Confirmed by Israeli Authorities

The Israeli Prime Minister’s Office confirmed the agreement with Hamas, noting that it would involve a temporary pause in hostilities and the phased exchange of hostages and prisoners. While Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu initially withheld comments, awaiting finalization, he later convened Israel’s security cabinet to discuss the deal’s approval.

“The State of Israel is committed to achieving all the goals of the war, including the return of all our hostages—both living and dead,” the Prime Minister’s Office stated.

Mediators from Qatar, the U.S., and Egypt played pivotal roles in brokering the arrangement. The full Israeli cabinet is expected to vote on the deal on Saturday, following a smaller security cabinet meeting scheduled for Friday.

Trump’s Stance on Ceasefire

President-elect Donald Trump, set to assume office on January 20, expressed urgency regarding the deal’s implementation. In an interview on The Dan Bongino Show, Trump said, “The implementation of the Gaza ceasefire and hostage deal better be done before I take the oath of office.” He also asserted that his incoming administration played a crucial role in expediting the agreement. “If we weren’t involved, the deal would never have happened,” Trump claimed.

Both Trump and Biden have taken credit for the breakthrough, with analysts attributing the cooperation to mutual interests. A senior Biden administration official described the bipartisan collaboration as “almost unprecedented.” However, Biden dismissed suggestions of credit-sharing with a sarcastic remark, prompting Trump to label his response as “ungracious.”

Humanitarian Toll Persists

Despite the ceasefire announcement, hostilities have continued in Gaza. According to Mahmoud Basal, a spokesperson for Gaza’s Civil Defense, Israeli strikes have resulted in 86 fatalities and 258 injuries since the deal’s revelation. Among the dead are 23 children. Israeli Defense Forces reported targeting approximately “50 terror sites” in Gaza during this period.

Calls for Political Unity in Israel

Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid urged Netanyahu to prioritize the deal’s implementation despite political pressures. Addressing Netanyahu on X, Lapid wrote, “Don’t be afraid or intimidated; you will get every safety net you need to make the hostage deal. This is more important than any disagreement we’ve ever had.”

Lapid’s comments came amid threats from far-right factions within Netanyahu’s coalition. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir warned of withdrawing his party’s support if the ceasefire proceeded. Similarly, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich’s Religious Zionism Party demanded a swift return to war following the deal’s initial phase. Such political rifts pose a potential risk to the stability of Netanyahu’s government.

White House Optimism

National Security Advisor John Kirby expressed confidence in the deal’s progression, despite last-minute challenges. “We are aware of these issues and are working through them with the Israeli government,” Kirby told CNN. “All systems are go right now. We see nothing that would derail this at this point.”

Delays in Israeli Cabinet Meeting

The Israeli cabinet’s vote on the ceasefire was postponed to Saturday due to unresolved issues at the negotiating table. Initially planned for Thursday, the meeting was deferred as mediators worked to finalize details in Doha. Netanyahu’s office indicated the government would only convene once these matters were resolved.

The ceasefire and hostage deal remain a focal point of international attention, with hopes that it will provide a path toward de-escalation in the region. However, as officials work to overcome political and logistical hurdles, the true test lies in the effective implementation of this fragile agreement.

US Officials Optimistic About Gaza Ceasefire Amid Disputes and Rising Death Toll

January 17, 2025January 20, 2025 Staff ReporterWorld 0

US officials expressed confidence that a Gaza ceasefire would proceed as planned on Sunday, despite claims from Israel that Hamas was reneging on its commitments. Hamas, however, reiterated its commitment to the agreement. BBC correspondent Rushdi Abualouf reported that Hamas appeared to be seeking a last-minute concession for the release of one or two symbolic prisoners from its ranks.

The Israeli cabinet’s planned vote on the ceasefire was postponed, while heavy airstrikes continued in Gaza. The region’s health ministry reported dozens of fatalities due to Israeli attacks ahead of the anticipated truce. At Gaza’s southern crossing, aid trucks queued as international assistance sought entry. BBC correspondent Fergal Keane accompanied an aid convoy traveling from Jordan.

The conflict was triggered by Hamas’ attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, which left around 1,200 Israelis dead and resulted in 251 individuals being taken hostage. In response, Israel launched a massive offensive on Gaza, which the Hamas-run health ministry claims has resulted in over 46,000 Palestinian deaths.

Disputes Over Ceasefire Agreement

Hamas denied Israel’s accusations of backtracking on the deal. Speaking to the BBC World Service’s Newshour, Bassem Naim, Hamas’ head of political and international relations, stated, “We are fully committed to the deal… This is the deal of May 2024 which we have accepted and agreed upon, and at that time it was rejected by Netanyahu and his government.” He accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of trying to “sabotage the positive atmosphere” due to his political struggles.

Naim also emphasized Hamas’ readiness to hold elections in Gaza, stating, “We are part of the Palestinian people… We are ready to give the people the choice to choose their leadership.” However, he avoided directly confirming whether Hamas would respect election results that rejected their leadership.

Heckler Disrupts Blinken’s Speech

In the United States, Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s farewell press conference was interrupted by a heckler. The protester accused Blinken of complicity in Gaza’s humanitarian crisis, shouting, “How does it feel to have your legacy be genocide?” and claiming that “300 reporters in Gaza were on the receiving end of your bombs.”

The individual, who filmed himself while speaking, was escorted out by security. Responding to the incident, Blinken remarked, “I’ve got a few more things to say [then] I’m happy to take any questions about anything, as we’ve done these past four years.”

Debates Over Casualty Figures

According to Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry, 46,788 people have died in the conflict since Israel’s military operations began in October 2023. The figures, however, do not differentiate between civilians and Hamas fighters. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) claim to have killed 17,000 Hamas combatants as of September 2024, though the methodology behind this figure has not been disclosed.

Zaher al-Wahidi, head of the Gaza health ministry’s information unit, explained the process for recording deaths, stating that deaths are verified either through hospital declarations or an online portal where families can report losses. This system, however, excludes those without valid identification, potentially leading to underreporting. Al-Wahidi acknowledged, “Many of those killed in conflict zones could be buried under the rubble of destroyed buildings.”

Israel disputes the reliability of the health ministry’s statistics but has not provided evidence to counter the claims. A study in the British medical journal The Lancet suggested that the actual death toll could be significantly higher, estimating 64,260 fatalities by June 2024. This contrasts with the ministry’s reported figure of 37,877 deaths at that time.

Global Reactions to the Ceasefire

The ceasefire deal has drawn mixed reactions from international leaders:

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi highlighted the extensive diplomatic efforts behind the agreement and stressed the importance of delivering urgent aid to Gaza until a sustainable peace is achieved.
Qatar’s Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed Bin Abdulrahman Al Thani described the ceasefire negotiations as part of his country’s diplomatic duty, expressing hope that the deal would help end the ongoing violence and suffering in Gaza.
South Africa’s government called for a “just and lasting peace” that ensures the human rights of both Palestinians and Israelis are respected.
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s office signaled Italy’s readiness to support Gaza’s stabilization and reconstruction efforts.

As international attention remains focused on the implementation of the ceasefire, aid organizations and diplomatic actors continue to emphasize the need for a resolution that addresses the root causes of the conflict.

Are growth numbers more important than the people? The Indian economic story begs some hard questions

January 17, 2025January 20, 2025 Jagdish RattananiIndia 0

Communal divides are bad, Economic divides being created can be equally so, with increasing concentration of wealth in the hands of fewer people so that we have a nation split, literally and metaphorically, between the few within gated communities and the majority who cannot step in.

More than half a century after the economist-philosopher E F Schumacher talked of “economics as if people mattered”, India is caught in an economic story that is increasingly about numbers bigger than the people they are meant to serve.

As 2023 drew to a close, Prime Minister Narendra Modi reiterated in Parliament that India will soon become the third largest global economy. Minister of State in the PMO Dr Jitendra Singh repeated the promise on Dec. 30, 2024, with these words: “Hopefully this year (India) will emerge as the 4th largest economy and during PM Modi’s 3rd term, India will be the world’s 3rd largest economy, marching on to become the No.1 economy by 2047.”

Putting numbers in perspective

The claims of a march to global superstardom come ironically not at a good time, even when looked at from a numbers-only perspective.

To begin, in the near term, growth is down and inflation is up.

GDP was 9% in 2022-23 H1, fell to 8.2% in 2023-24 and further slipped to 6% in 2024-25 H1. GVA (Gross Value Added), which is growth on the supply side, was 6.2% in 2024-25 H1, down from the 8% mark in the same period for the previous two years.

Inflation (CPI-Combined) crossed the targeted upper threshold of 6% in October 2024, with food inflation at an alarming 9.69%. Food inflation this close to double digits was at a 14-month high. CPI inflation came down to 5.48% in November 2024, with continued high food inflation at 8.2%.

Largely, inflation has been on a higher trajectory since 2020, above the mandated upper target of 6% for as many as 25 months in the last four years.

It is plain that the Indian economy has had a bumpy ride in the year gone by, with many red and yellow warning lights. The hope being expressed is that the ride will settle and pick up pace, an optimism reflected in the statement of the newly appointed RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra: “… prospects for the Indian economy are expected to improve after the slowdown in the pace of economic activity in the first half of 2024-25.”

Growth giving out wrong signals

Here comes the clamour for a rate cut as a panacea, but since food inflation is alarmingly high, a rate cut must come by ignoring this fact. Yet, food inflation hits the poor the most, so this approach translates to ignoring the poor while keeping the engine going along the lines of failed trickle-down theories. As the illustrious former RBI Deputy Governor Savak Tarapore once remarked: “(High) food inflation just cannot be wished away as a supply side problem…it gnaws into the vitals of large tracts of the population.”

In November, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said it was “absolutely flawed theory” to consider food inflation when deciding on bank interest rates. The call for excluding food inflation while working the central bank’s inflation targeting framework rather than expressing alarm at galloping food inflation ignores the simple wisdom that the common man suffers first from food inflation, not from core inflation.

Keeping to first principles, lower rates should push credit delivery, drive increased investment, see more projects take off and deliver growth — the sign of a nation on the move. Yet, these first principles don’t translate to practice when the signals going out are contrary to the idea of growth that is fair, balanced and equitable.

Nepotism and weak governance

Regulatory frameworks must work for all sides and all parties. Good governance is a pre-requisite for good growth. But the Indian economic story has been marked by weak governance and strong signals emanating from the top that all business houses are not created equal.

The continued inaction on allegations against the house of the Adanis, the loss of moral authority of the premier regulator the SEBI, with the Chair personally embroiled in connected allegations, the political donations that came through the opacity of electoral bonds, since struck down by the Supreme Court, the selective use of the investigative agencies, and the willingness to use strong-arm tactics to silence critics are all part of a philosophy of command and control. These signals sit at odds with the idea of free market entrepreneurship and investing; they kill creativity, innovation and risk-taking that can fire animal spirits and take the economy to a higher orbit. Before considering an investment today, a prudent businessman must consider how his or her statements and positions and partners will sit with the powers that be, then carefully tip-toe around any potential political minefield before making an investment decision.

Headline grabbing has its limitations

Separating good governance from good economics, almost cutting them into neat exclusive sets and then expecting durable growth is like asking everyone to join in the marathon when the winners are pre-decided. The game will soon be seen as a charade, with longer term implications for investments, reputation and growth numbers.

Not away from the headlines of laudatory mentions on growth is the story of a per capita income that keeps a majority of Indians away from the benefits of the claimed growth success. Coupled with a pervasive joblessness that shows up in events that are eye-popping, like the stampedes when lakhs queue-up for a limited number of vacancies, it speaks of a nation divided, its businesses subdued, its citizens reduced to searching for non-existent jobs. Communal divides are bad, Economic divides being created can be equally so, with increasing concentration of wealth in the hands of fewer people so that we have a nation split, literally and metaphorically, between the few within gated communities and the majority who cannot step in. In that sense, Mumbai’s glittering high rises built by BJP-friendly builders are a symptom of a deeper rot.

Economists will tell you that good growth and price stability are the two pillars of a robust economy. These work on the backbone of financial stability. In this context, note the accolades being claimed over the headline statement that bank non- performing assets (NPAs) have been brought down in the system. It is indeed true that NPAs in the banking system have fallen.

To quote the official statement titled ‘Public Sector Banks: A Resurgent Force’: “The Gross NPA ratio of Public Sector Banks (PSBs) has witnessed a remarkable improvement, declining to 3.12% in September 2024 from a peak of 14.58% in March 2018. This significant reduction reflects the success of targeted interventions aimed at addressing stress within the banking system.” But how has this reduction been achieved?

There is an increased tendency to clean the books with write-offs. For example, reduction in Gross NPAs during 2023-24 for all public sector banks was of the order of Rs.1,73,090 crore (~1.73 lakh cr), of which as much as Rs.1,12,515 crore (~1.13 lakh cr) were plain write-offs. This tendency will need some further probing if financial stability is not to be reduced to a joke. Further, there is an urgent need to study the quantum of new NPAs being added to the system as more of the old ones are written off. In 2023-24, Rs.84,435 crore new NPAs were added to the public sector banking system.

This is a cautionary tale as we step into the New Year. Governance and economic management cannot be reduced to headline grabbing for long.

(The writer is a journalist and faculty member at SPJIMR, Mumbai. Views expressed are personal. By special arrangement with The Billion Press)

Source Credit: https://www.southasiamonitor.org/perspective/are-growth-numbers-more-important-people-indian-economic-story-begs-some-hard-questions

Bollywood’s Islamophobic turn: Hindu mythology with Muslim villains

January 17, 2025January 20, 2025 Bilal Ahmad TantrayCinema 0

Hindu mythology has arguably been the most inexhaustible source of inspiration for Indian cinema. In 1912-13, when Dadasaheb Phalke, the father of Indian cinema, wrote, directed, edited and processed Raja Harishchandra, based on a Puranic tale of a righteous king, Indian cinema’s long relationship with Hindu mythology was initiated. Phalke continued to draw from the deep and ancient well of Hindu epics as he based many of his films, like Mohini Bhasmasur, Satyavan Savitri, Lanka Dahan, Shri Krishna Janma and Kaliya Mardan, on mythological stories. These texts, brought to life in India through plays, musicals, and dance performances before cinema, were transferred onto film. In later years, when the scope of cinema broadened, the contribution of mythology as the first-ever plot base for Indian films continued. Actors like NTR assumed a God-like stature for their portrayal of mythology-based characters.

One form in which mythology was used in Hindi cinema was the direct re-telling of the epics in audio-visual form. Stories from Hindu epics came to be repeatedly reproduced. Babubhai Mistry’s Sampoorna Ramayana (1961) and Mahabharat (1965), Chandrakant’s Bajrangbali (1976) and Madhusudan Rao’s Lav Kush (1997) are only a few of the many examples. Ramanand Sagar’s teledrama, Ramayana (1987), became the most-watched tele-series in the world. The popularity of the series was such that Anvil Govil, the actor who played Lord Ram, contested and won the 2024 Lok Sabha elections from Meerut using that image.

Over the years, Indian filmmakers realised the popularity and reach of epic narratives and started making adaptations where contemporary stories would be told while drawing references to Hindu epics, especially Ramayana and Mahabharata. Prakash Jha’s Rajneeti (2010) depicted the rivalry between two political parties using narrative form and characters inspired by Mahabharata, which is a case in point. This is the second form in which Hindi filmmakers have used mythology as a source.

In the third form of this influence, we see films that are neither direct reproductions of Hindu epics nor new-age renditions but have broader themes, subplots or characters inspired by Hindu mythology. Kabir Khan’s Bajrangi Bhaijaan (2015) is an example where the protagonist, as a devout believer, towards the climax of the film, starts exhibiting the characteristics of the deity he worships. Anubhav Sinha’s Shahrukh Khan starer Ra.One (2011) tells the story of a videogame antagonist who escapes the virtual world to enter the real one. Even this ultra-modern villain is based on the immortal Lankan king Ravana’s character from Ramayana.

A disturbing new trend

In continuation of this tradition, quite a few mythology-based and mythology-inspired films have been made recently. However, a disturbing fourth trend may have started to emerge. At least two recent adaptations of Hindu mythology in Hindi cinema had Muslim villains. Sandeep Vanga Reddy’s 2023 blockbuster film titled ‘Animal’ is probably remembered more for the controversies it generated rather than the film’s content. It was heavily criticised for the blatant misogyny of its male characters and its glorification of violence. Although the film doesn’t use any major Mahabharata references, the larger plot of a broken family brought to war by contested claims over an empire is reminiscent of the Mahabharata’s central storyline. The guilt foregrounded while the main lead fights and eventually kills his enemy/cousin-brother is comparable to Arjuna’s movement of ambiguity before he seeks Krishna’s advice on taking up arms against his brothers. What is intriguing about Animal is that even though it is a story of family conflict, the protagonist’s and antagonist’s sides are of different religions. While Ranbir Kapoor’s (referentially named Arjun) side of the family is an ambiguous mixture of Sikh and Hindu, Bobby Deol and his brothers are Muslim.

Although both sides in the film are shown engaging in an imaginative variety of violent acts in the movie, which led to the movie being criticised for glorifying violence, the violence that the Hindu and Sikh characters perpetrate is visually very different from the violence that Abrar (Bobby Deol’s character) and his gang carry out. While Arjun’s violence is coronated with pumping background music and inspirational folk songs, Abrar’s violent actions are bestial and sickening. The movie’s characters are shown as uber-rich, equipped with the most advanced weapons. Still, for some reason, the battles between the groups often shift from modern weapons and machine guns to cleavers, knives and axes. Arjun uses an axe when he heroically fights dozens of men all by himself in a scene that takes ‘inspiration’ from a famous action sequence in Park Chan-Wook’s 2003 Korean film Oldman. Abrar’s use of the blade, on the other hand, is much more revolting and uncalled for in the arc of the film. In his introductory scene, Abrar stabs a man who brings him the news of his brother’s death in the eye with a cake knife. The fact that Abrar cannot speak only adds to his presentation as a barbaric animal.

A modern retelling of Ramayana

Similar is the case with the recently released 3rd film in Rohit Shetty’s commercially successful Singham franchise. Unlike Animal, which refers to Mahabharata only occasionally, Singham 3 overtly attempts to be a modern retelling of Ramayana. Each of the significant characters of the film is modelled after characters in the Hindu epic. The protagonist, Bajirao Singham’s wife, is kidnapped by a gangster. To rescue her, Singham is aided by characters played by Ranveer Singh (Hanuman), Tiger Shroff (Lakshman), and Akshay Kumar (Garuda), who enter the impenetrable stronghold of the villain, played by Arjun Kapoor. Surprisingly, given that Ravanna was a devout Brahmin, Arjun Kapoor’s character, a murderous drug lord based in Sri Lanka, is a Muslim named Zubair.

Despite being an internationally feared criminal, whose gang members use expensive cars, machine guns, bazookas and the occasional helicopter, Zubair, in many of the scenes, walks around with an oversized knife in his mouth. This forcible addition of a butcher-like Muslim villain in a film, the plot of which is based on Hindu mythology, would have been challenging to explain had we not been privy to a generally Islamophobic turn that Hindi cinema has taken in the last decade.

The excessive demonisation of Muslims in Bollywood in the last decade is quite well documented. The heightening of communal tensions in recent times has been cashed in by Hindi filmmakers who have developed an incessant need for Muslim villains in their films. Whether the script allows it or not, filmmakers like Vanga Reddy and Rohit Shetty have proven that the plot can be bent over and around to make sure that the antagonist is a Muslim. While the problematic depiction of Muslims has been a regular feature in Indian cinema in the past decade, the penetration of the purely commercial populist logic for a Muslim villain has, probably for the first time, percolated into cinematic renditions of Hindu epics.

(The author is a PhD scholar and teaching assistant at Shiv Nadar University, India. Views are personal. He can be contacted at bt852@snu.edu.in )

Source Credit:https://www.southasiamonitor.org/medley/bollywoods-islamophobic-turn-hindu-mythology-muslim-villains

Community Honors Manmohan Singh’s Legacy at Memorial in New Jersey

January 15, 2025January 17, 2025 Staff ReporterCommunity 0

A heartfelt tribute to India’s former Prime Minister, the late Manmohan Singh, took place at a special prayer meeting on Saturday, January 11, 2025, at the Royal Albert’s Palace in New Jersey. The event, organized by the New Jersey Chapter of the Indian Overseas Congress (IOC) and the Indo-American Cultural Society USA, Inc., brought together over 500 attendees, including community leaders, local and federal officials, and prominent IOC members, to commemorate the life and contributions of a leader often hailed as the architect of modern India’s economy.

The gathering featured distinguished IOC leaders from the United States and India. Among those present were IOC National Vice President John Joseph, Karnataka President Rajiv Gowda, Punjab President Gurmeet Singh Gill, Telangana President Rajeshwar Reddy, and Andhra Pradesh President Sriniwasarao Bhimineni. Additional greetings were extended by IOC Joint Secretary Arjumand Juveria, General Secretary Harbachan Singh, and Pomposh Sheikh, who shared personal recollections of Singh. IOC National President Mohinder Singh Gilzian and NJ Chapter Vice Presidents Anil Patel, Mahesh Patel, and Manmit Singh Vasdev were also in attendance.

The event commenced with a poignant video message from Sam Pitroda, President of IOC Global and USA. Pitroda paid tribute to Singh’s transformative impact on India’s economy and governance. Video clips featuring interviews with Singh conducted by renowned Indian journalists, including Punya Prasun Vajpai, Ashok Vankhede, and Abhisar Sharma, highlighted the former Prime Minister’s visionary leadership.

Speakers reflected on Singh’s enduring legacy, emphasizing his pivotal role in reshaping India through groundbreaking economic reforms. Pradeep Peter Kothari, President of the Indo-American Cultural Society USA, and Pardip Samala, IOC Working President, spoke of Singh’s leadership and his impact on the nation. North Brunswick Council Member Rajesh Mehta and Woodbridge Township Council Member Viru Patel, along with former New Jersey Governor Jim McGreevey, NJ Senator Owen Henry, and community leader Upendra Chirukula, shared their perspectives on Singh’s achievements.

Jim McGreevey, a former New Jersey Governor, described Singh as a “Gentle Giant.” He highlighted how former U.S. President Barack Obama, in his memoir A Promised Land, praised Singh as “wise, thoughtful, and scrupulously honest.” McGreevey remarked, “Singh understood the critical importance of economic reforms and drafted what economists consider one of the most radical budgets in India’s history in 1991.” He credited Singh with initiating India’s economic transformation, enabling it to emerge as a global economic power.

Woodbridge Township Council Member Viru Patel applauded Singh’s role in fostering cooperation among nations of the global south, including Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Korea. Patel stated, “Through South-South cooperation, Singh laid the groundwork for a dynamic and vigorous global economy.”

Community leader Upendra Chirukula emphasized Singh’s visionary approach, citing his efforts to dismantle the License Raj, combat corruption, and revive India’s economy. “He made life significantly better for the people of India. Singh’s legacy should be celebrated, not mourned,” Chirukula affirmed.

Kothari commended Singh for his tenure as an economist, Reserve Bank of India chairman, Finance Minister, and Prime Minister. He stated, “This prayer meeting is a sincere effort to honor Singh’s decade of service to the world.” Rajesh Mehta echoed this sentiment, describing Singh as “one of India’s finest Prime Ministers.”

NJ Senator Owen Henry expressed deep admiration for Singh, noting, “I will pray to him every day for strength and courage to make tough decisions as he did for India.” Drawing a parallel with former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, Henry remarked, “Singh and Carter are shining examples of how we can make the world a better place.”

The event concluded with a moving rendition of India’s national anthem, followed by prayers and bhajans. A vote of thanks was delivered by Kothari and Mukesh Kashiwala, who expressed gratitude to the organizing committee members of the IOC and the Indo-American Cultural Society USA for their efforts in creating a fitting tribute.

Manmohan Singh’s legacy as a statesman, economist, and leader continues to inspire millions. This memorial served as a testament to his profound impact on India and the world, celebrating a life dedicated to the service of humanity.

Joe Biden’s Tumultuous Presidency: Achievements, Missteps, and the Road to Trump’s Return

January 14, 2025January 17, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

Standing at a lectern in Washington’s National Cathedral, Joe Biden eulogized former President Jimmy Carter as three former presidents—Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama—and Donald Trump looked on. Biden, like Carter, is a one-term president. The parallels were evident as Biden paid tribute to Carter, commending his foresight and achievements in civil rights, peace, nuclear non-proliferation, and environmental protection.

“Many think he was from a bygone era, but in reality, he saw well into the future,” Biden said.

Earlier that week, Biden reflected on his own presidency. “I hope history says I came in with a plan to restore the economy and America’s global leadership,” he stated in an interview. “And I hope it records that I did it with honesty and integrity.”

As Biden prepares to leave office with approval ratings near their lowest at 39%, history’s judgment remains uncertain. His presidency ends with his 2020 opponent, Donald Trump, poised to reclaim power, framing Biden’s tenure as a bridge between Trump’s two terms.

Author and strategist Susan Estrich summarized Biden’s legacy as one tied to Trump. “He’d like his legacy to be that he rescued us from Trump. But sadly, for him, it’s Trump again.”

Early Missteps and Challenges

Biden’s presidency faced setbacks from its early days. The chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 was a turning point. Though the Trump administration had negotiated the exit, Biden approved it despite military advisors’ warnings. The resulting turmoil in Kabul damaged Biden’s approval, which fell below 50% and never recovered.

Domestically, inflation surged past 5% for the first time in 30 years by mid-2021. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Biden initially called it “transitory,” a stance contradicted by economists like Larry Summers. By June 2022, inflation peaked at 9.1%, forcing the administration to concede its miscalculations. Although inflation later dropped below 3%, public sentiment remained pessimistic.

The administration also struggled with the post-Covid surge in undocumented migration and was unprepared for Republican-led efforts to relocate migrants to northern cities. Other crises—shortages in Covid tests, rising egg prices, and the overturning of Roe v. Wade—compounded public dissatisfaction.

While many challenges were global in scope, including the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, they heightened the stakes for Biden, who sought to position Democrats as a competent counterweight to authoritarian regimes.

Biden’s Public Perception

Biden’s communication skills, once praised, appeared diminished. A senior White House official noted, “Watching Biden speak, I’m like, oh my God, this is a different person.” Special counsel Robert Hur’s report on Biden’s handling of classified documents described him as an “elderly man with a poor memory,” reinforcing Republican attacks on his age.

The administration restricted Biden’s media interactions and carefully scripted his public appearances. Yet verbal gaffes and stumbles became ammunition for opponents. Biden’s age became a defining issue, particularly as his performance in public events appeared inconsistent.

Legislative Wins and Long-Term Goals

Despite challenges, Biden’s administration achieved significant legislative milestones. Early successes included the $2 trillion American Rescue Plan, which funded Covid vaccine distribution and reduced child poverty to record lows. His bipartisan infrastructure bill allocated $1 trillion to transportation, clean energy, and broadband expansion.

However, critics like historian Brent Cebul argued that the administration’s focus on long-term policy outcomes was out of sync with voters’ immediate needs. Biden himself admitted the delay in tangible benefits during a later interview.

Internal Struggles and Political Battles

Biden’s team excelled at navigating narrow congressional majorities, but internal dynamics became strained over time. A senior official admitted that as progress stalled, “infighting and frustration” grew. The administration faced mounting Republican opposition, including hearings on Afghanistan, Hunter Biden’s business dealings, and an impeachment inquiry in September 2023.

Biden’s presidency was marked by two distinct phases, says Cebul. The early period saw major accomplishments, but the later years were defined by less focus and greater public dissatisfaction.

A Beleaguered Re-election Campaign

On April 25, 2023, Biden announced his re-election campaign, framing it as a battle against Trump’s “extremists.” He championed “Bidenomics,” touting economic growth and inflation reduction. However, his message failed to resonate with many Americans.

During a June 2023 trip to Chicago, Biden emphasized restoring the American dream. “Bidenomics is about the future,” he declared. Yet his halting delivery and missteps undermined the message. Cebul criticized Biden’s focus on economic success, calling it “discordant” given public sentiment.

Despite internal and external doubts, Biden maintained he was the best candidate to defeat Trump. “I’m not a young guy,” he acknowledged in a campaign ad, “but I understand how to get things done for the American people.”

New Crises: Hamas and Hunter Biden

The October 7 Hamas attack on Israel added another challenge to Biden’s presidency. While Biden cautioned Israel against overreach, domestic support for his handling of the conflict waned.

Meanwhile, Hunter Biden’s legal troubles, including a gun charge conviction and tax-related indictments, became a distraction. Biden’s decision to pardon his son after November’s election drew widespread criticism.

The End of a Presidency

Biden’s campaign effectively ended during a June debate with Trump in Atlanta. His confused performance reinforced concerns about his age and capabilities. Trump’s subsequent resurgence, marked by a unified party convention and response to an assassination attempt, solidified his lead.

In July, Biden withdrew from the race. Kamala Harris, Biden’s chosen successor, lost to Trump in the general election, sealing the final judgment on Biden’s political career as one of defeat.

Reflecting on Biden’s decision to seek re-election, Estrich argued, “We should have had primaries. His successor would have had time to make the case.”

Biden’s Legacy in Retrospect

Had Biden stepped aside after one term, his legacy might have been different. Avoiding a grueling campaign could have allowed him to be remembered for legislative achievements rather than missteps.

With Trump’s imminent return to office, much of Biden’s work faces potential dismantling. Attorney General Merrick Garland succinctly captured the uncertainty surrounding Biden’s legacy: “I’ll leave that to the historians.”

As Biden departs the White House, his presidency is framed by the successes of his early years and the challenges that defined its conclusion. His ultimate place in history rests on how the next chapter of American politics unfolds.

Wind-Fueled Wildfires Threaten Los Angeles Area, Push Firefighters to Their Limits

January 14, 2025January 16, 2025 Staff ReporterUSA 0

A growing force of firefighters arrived in the Los Angeles area on Monday, preparing for another round of fierce winds expected to spark new wildfires and potentially undo recent progress in battling devastating blazes. These wildfires have already claimed at least 24 lives and destroyed thousands of homes.

Reinforcements, including water trucks and planes loaded with fire retardants, came from across the United States as well as Canada and Mexico. The National Weather Service warned that conditions over the next few days could turn “particularly dangerous,” with gusts in the mountains expected to reach up to 65 mph (105 kph). Dennis Burns, a fire behavior analyst, cautioned at a community meeting on Sunday night that Tuesday would likely be the most perilous day.

Sunday’s relative lull allowed some evacuees to return home, but the respite also brought grim news: the death toll rose late Sunday after a report from the Los Angeles County medical examiner. Authorities revealed that 16 people remained missing, with the number expected to climb further as search efforts continued.

In a chilling reminder of the destruction, a car drove past homes and vehicles reduced to ash by the Palisades Fire in the Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates on Sunday, January 12, 2025. The area has become emblematic of the destruction caused by the Santa Ana winds, which have been a key factor in turning last week’s small wildfires into raging infernos.

The fires have ravaged areas around Los Angeles, a region that has seen no significant rainfall for over eight months. In less than a week, four major wildfires have consumed more than 62 square miles (160 square kilometers), an area roughly three times the size of Manhattan.

The Eaton Fire near Pasadena and the Palisades Fire along the Pacific Coast have been particularly destructive. While firefighters have made significant strides in containing these blazes, with the Eaton Fire now about one-third contained, the forecasted high winds could exacerbate the situation. These conditions may lead to rapid fire growth and spark new blazes in areas that have so far remained unscathed, creating additional challenges for already exhausted crews.

“We are prepared for the upcoming wind event,” said Los Angeles County Fire Chief Anthony C. Marrone. He confirmed the arrival of 70 additional water trucks to bolster efforts against flames that could spread quickly with the renewed gusts. Fire retardants dropped by aircraft are being deployed to create barriers along vulnerable hillsides, offering some hope of limiting the damage.

Meanwhile, residents have taken matters into their own hands in some areas. In Topanga Canyon, a community of artists, musicians, and friends joined forces to prevent fires from spreading by shutting off gas lines and propane tanks. Their quick actions may have saved several homes, according to Derek Mabra, who witnessed the devastation firsthand.

“We helped hopefully save a couple of houses, and we put out a couple of spot fires,” Mabra said as he drove along the coast, surveying the destruction. “It’s complete and total devastation.”

As the battle against these wildfires continues, firefighters and residents alike brace for the dangerous winds ahead, knowing that their efforts over the coming days could be the difference between further catastrophe and eventual recovery.

A Shift in Trump’s Rhetoric

Ongoing Peace Talks

Trade and Tariffs Take Center Stage

Concerns Over Immigration Policies

From ‘Namaste Trump!’ to ‘Howdy, Modi!’

Shifts Since the ‘Howdy, Modi!’ Event

Modi’s Agenda in Washington

The Strategic Importance of US-India Relations

Exit from Paris Agreement

Catastrophic Impact on Health Services

Research and Vaccine Development in Jeopardy

Global Health at Risk

The Films of the YRF Spy Universe

Box Office Performance of Each Film

Origins of the YRF Spy Universe

Comparing the YRF Spy Universe with Other Franchises

Future Prospects for the YRF Spy Universe

TheUNN Corporation

CONTACT US

Follow us

Subscribe to Newsletter