Stalin Joins Rahul Yatra in Bihar, Criticizes EC and BJP

August 28, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics 0

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. K. Stalin joined Rahul Gandhi’s Voter Adhikar Yatra in Bihar, criticizing the Election Commission and the BJP while praising local leaders for their commitment to democracy.

Bihar: Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and DMK chief M. K. Stalin participated in the Voter Adhikar Yatra led by Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday, where he condemned the Election Commission for its recent voter roll deletions. He described the removal of 6.5 million Biharis from the voter list as a “massacre of democracy,” emphasizing that it is an affront to those born and living in their own land.

Stalin, who traveled over 2,000 kilometers to join the rally, addressed a public meeting alongside party MP Kanimozhi. He expressed his admiration for Bihar, stating, “When we say Bihar, the one who comes to everyone’s mind is the name of Lalu Prasad Yadav.” He praised Yadav as a symbol of social justice and secularism, recalling the close friendship between Yadav and the late DMK leader Kalaignar.

Stalin highlighted Yadav’s resilience in the face of political challenges, asserting, “Despite so many cases and threats, he did politics without fearing the BJP. Lalu Prasad Yadav stands tall today as one of India’s greatest political leaders.” He also commended Tejashwi Yadav, Lalu’s son, for his dedication to the political legacy of his father.

Reflecting on Bihar’s historical significance, Stalin remarked that the entire nation has been watching the state for the past month. He noted, “That is the strength of the people of Bihar. The strength of Rahul Gandhi. The strength of Tejashwi.” He recalled the legacy of Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Narayan, who rallied for democracy and socialism, drawing parallels to the current efforts of Gandhi and Tejashwi Yadav in their yatra.

The DMK leader emphasized the camaraderie between Gandhi and Tejashwi, stating, “Your friendship is not only political; it is the friendship of two brothers. You have come together to protect democracy—for the welfare of the people.” He expressed confidence that this alliance would lead to victory in the upcoming Bihar elections.

Stalin took a strong stance against the BJP, declaring, “The BJP’s treacherous politics is going to lose. Even before the election, your victory has already been decided.” He accused the ruling party of attempting to undermine the electoral process to prevent a fair vote, asserting that the Election Commission has become a “puppet” of the BJP.

He reiterated his condemnation of the voter roll deletions, asking, “To remove people born and living in their own land from the rolls, what could be more terror than that?” He criticized the BJP for trying to thwart the electoral success of Gandhi and Tejashwi through underhanded tactics.

Stalin praised Gandhi for his courage in exposing the alleged manipulations of the Election Commission, noting that the Chief Election Commissioner has demanded Gandhi file an affidavit and apologize. “Will Rahul Gandhi be afraid of these threats?” he asked the crowd, affirming Gandhi’s fearless approach to politics.

He accused the BJP of infringing upon the people’s right to vote, asserting that the public would ultimately reclaim their power. “That is what this gathering in Bihar shows,” he said, referencing the unity of opposition parties against the BJP’s dominance.

Stalin recalled the origins of the INDIA alliance in Patna, stating that it was here that the BJP’s perceived invincibility was challenged. He urged the people of Bihar to once again demonstrate that any form of dictatorship must yield to the power of the populace.

During the yatra, Gandhi also took the opportunity to criticize the BJP-led NDA government. He pointed to a media report alleging that anonymous parties in Gujarat received donations totaling Rs 4,300 crore between 2019 and 2024, questioning whether the Election Commission would investigate these claims.

In a pointed remark aimed at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Gandhi recounted an incident during Operation Sindoor, where he alleged that Modi halted military actions under pressure from former U.S. President Donald Trump. “Trump dialed PM Modi and said: ‘Listen… whatever you’re doing, stop it within 24 hours,’ and Narendra Modi stopped everything within five hours,” he stated.

The 16-day Voter Adhikar Yatra, which commenced on August 17 from Sasaram, is set to conclude with a pad yatra in Patna on September 1. The journey has covered over 1,300 kilometers across various districts in Bihar, with assembly elections approaching later this year.

As the yatra progresses, it continues to draw significant attention and participation, underscoring the political mobilization in Bihar ahead of the elections.

Source: Original article

Sunil Gavaskar Critiques Asia Cup Squad Selection Debate

August 26, 2025 Staff ReporterCricket, Election, USA 0

Sunil Gavaskar criticized foreign cricketers for disparaging Indian cricket, asserting they are merely trying to profit from their comments.

Sunil Gavaskar, the legendary Indian cricketer, has voiced strong criticism against overseas players who he believes are undermining Indian cricket. He accused them of “throwing dirt” on the sport in India while attempting to profit from their remarks.

Gavaskar’s comments come in the context of ongoing debates surrounding the selection of the Indian squad for the Asia Cup. The former cricketer has been a vocal advocate for the integrity of Indian cricket, often defending its players and the decisions made by the selection committee.

In recent years, several international cricketers have made headlines for their controversial statements regarding Indian players and the cricketing system in India. Gavaskar argues that these comments are often motivated by a desire to gain attention or financial benefit rather than a genuine concern for the sport.

He emphasized that Indian cricket has a rich history and a strong following, and it should not be tarnished by the opinions of those who do not fully understand its nuances. Gavaskar’s remarks serve as a reminder of the pride many Indian cricketers feel for their national team and the sport as a whole.

As discussions around the Asia Cup squad continue, Gavaskar’s sharp critique highlights the tensions that can arise in the world of cricket, especially when it comes to national pride and the influence of foreign voices.

His passionate defense of Indian cricket resonates with fans and players alike, reinforcing the notion that the sport is not just a game but a significant part of India’s cultural identity.

Gavaskar’s legacy as a cricketer and commentator positions him as a key figure in these discussions, and his insights are often sought after by both the media and cricket enthusiasts.

As the Asia Cup approaches, the focus will remain on the players selected to represent India, but Gavaskar’s comments remind everyone of the broader context in which these discussions take place.

In a sport that often sees players from different nations engaging in friendly banter, Gavaskar’s call for respect and understanding underscores the importance of valuing the contributions of Indian cricket while also acknowledging the perspectives of international players.

Ultimately, the debate surrounding the Asia Cup squad is just one of many instances where the intersection of national pride and international scrutiny plays out in the world of cricket.

As fans eagerly await the tournament, Gavaskar’s words will likely echo in the minds of many, serving as a rallying cry for those who cherish the legacy of Indian cricket.

Source: Original article

Redistricting Conflicts Challenge Minority Voting Power and Democratic Trust

August 26, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Redistricting battles in the U.S. threaten minority voting power and undermine public trust in democracy as political parties manipulate district maps for electoral advantage.

Redistricting—the process of redrawing congressional maps after each census—is intended to promote fairness and accurate representation. However, in today’s polarized political climate, it has become one of the most contentious issues in U.S. politics. At its core, the issue is straightforward: the party that controls the redistricting process often dictates the outcome of elections. Currently, Republicans in Texas and Democrats in California are wielding redistricting as a tool to secure more congressional seats, raising concerns about the erosion of democratic principles and public trust in the electoral system.

The urgency of the situation was underscored during an August 22 briefing by American Community Media (ACoM), where experts discussed the potential consequences of proposed map changes. Texas has aggressively pursued redrawing its congressional districts with the aim of adding five Republican-dominated districts, a strategy designed to flip the House in the 2026 midterm elections.

State Representative Gene Wu, the Democratic Leader in the Texas House, has characterized this effort as “cheating.” He argues that Republicans are responsible for policies leading to significant price increases, job losses, and a looming recession. “Here’s the problem. If this is allowed to happen across the board, if every state, whether they’re red or blue, does this every single time after every election, politicians and leaders will no longer listen to the people,” Rep. Wu explains. “Why would they need to listen when they’re guaranteed to win every time?”

At the heart of the redistricting debate is the potential dilution of minority voting power, which directly impacts communities of color. This dilution occurs through two primary tactics: packing and cracking. Packing involves concentrating too many minority voters into a single district, allowing them to win decisively in that district but diminishing their influence elsewhere. For instance, in Houston, two historically strong Black districts are being merged into one that is 80% Black. This change means the community would elect only one Black representative instead of two, effectively halving their overall representation.

Cracking, on the other hand, involves dispersing minority communities across multiple districts dominated by white voters. In regions like South Texas and Dallas, Latino voters have spent years building political power. However, the new maps fracture their communities, splitting them into separate districts, thereby diminishing their collective voice. As Rep. Wu succinctly puts it, “They can vote all they want. They’ll never be able to change the outcome of any election.”

Thomas Saenz, President and General Counsel at the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), emphasizes that Texas has previously manipulated the rules during the 2021 redistricting process to solidify Republican control. The resulting map ignored the state’s rapid demographic changes, providing Republicans with an unfair advantage.

Now, with the push for five additional GOP seats, Saenz argues that Texas is blatantly violating the Voting Rights Act. He points out that the growth of Latino and other communities of color in Texas since 2020 has outpaced that of the white community. In a fair system, this demographic growth should translate into increased political power for those communities. Instead, the new maps are designed to suppress that power, effectively erasing the gains that should accompany population growth.

In California, Governor Gavin Newsom has responded with his own aggressive strategy. He has pushed legislation to suspend the state’s independent redistricting commission and place a new Democratic-leaning map on the November ballot, aiming to secure up to five additional House seats. Newsom describes this approach as “fighting fire with fire,” framing it as a necessary countermeasure to the gerrymandering tactics employed by Republicans in Texas.

Sam Wang, Director of the Electoral Innovation Lab at Princeton University, notes that while there are standards for racial fairness in redistricting, they are not uniformly applied across states. The Supreme Court has ruled that partisan redistricting is unconstitutional but has refrained from taking action to address it. This lack of oversight means that state-level actions and laws are crucial in tackling voting rights issues. Wang explains that Texas, lacking state laws governing redistricting, operates in a “Wild West” environment, leaving legislative Democrats with few options other than denying a quorum. In contrast, states like California, Michigan, Colorado, Arizona, Virginia, and New Jersey have established independent commissions or other mechanisms to ensure fairer redistricting processes.

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF), represented by Assistant Counsel Sara Rohani, is actively fighting against unfair redistricting practices across the nation. Following the 2020 census, which revealed significant growth among voters of color, many states redrew their maps without a key safeguard from the Voting Rights Act that the Supreme Court struck down in 2013. Without this protection, numerous states enacted maps that weakened Black and Latino voting power.

While courts have invalidated discriminatory maps in states such as Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and Louisiana, the battles continue. Alabama has openly defied a Supreme Court order and is now attempting to dismantle the Voting Rights Act itself. In Louisiana, a newly proposed Black-majority district, which should have expanded representation, is being challenged as a “racial gerrymander” and has been sent back to court. Rohani explains that the LDF is now compelled not only to sue against unfair maps but also to defend fair ones from being dismantled.

Despite these challenges, experts agree on one crucial point: voter turnout remains the most potent weapon against gerrymandering. When minority communities mobilize and vote in large numbers, they can effectively counteract suppression efforts.

Source: Original article

Behind the Controversy of Redrawing Texas Political Maps

August 26, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Texas is embroiled in a contentious political battle over redistricting, raising concerns about representation and the voices of marginalized communities ahead of the 2026 elections.

The Lone Star State is currently facing a political firestorm that extends beyond party control; it delves into the fundamental issue of representation. The ongoing debate centers on whose voices are amplified and whose are marginalized in the electoral process.

On August 14, a briefing hosted by American Community Media (ACoM) brought together state lawmakers, civil rights lawyers, and advocates to address what they term a “redistricting war.” The focus of this conflict is the Republican-led initiative to redraw Texas’s electoral maps, a move critics argue is designed to benefit the party in the upcoming 2026 elections while undermining the voting power of Black, Latino, and Asian communities.

Texas State Representative Gene Wu, who participated in the briefing from Chicago, highlighted the urgency of the situation. Wu, along with numerous Democratic colleagues, had previously staged a dramatic walkout on August 3 to block a quorum and stall the redistricting bill. “This isn’t just politics—it’s cheating,” Wu asserted. “They’re trying to rewrite the rules mid-game because they know they’re losing.”

Wu elaborated on the tactics being employed in the redistricting process, describing them as “cracking and packing.” He explained, “They’re cracking minority communities into pieces and attaching them to districts that don’t share their interests. Or they’re packing us into one district, so we can’t influence others. Either way, it’s about silencing us.”

He raised a critical alarm about the implications of these changes: “If this goes through, your voice will carry less weight. If you’re Latino, your vote might count as one-third of a white vote. If you’re Black, maybe one-fifth. That’s not democracy.” Wu warned that if such practices are allowed to continue, it could set a dangerous precedent for redistricting efforts across the country. “If they get away with this, every state will start redrawing maps after every election they don’t like. That’s the end of our republic,” he cautioned.

The concerns surrounding the redistricting process are echoed by Karla Maradiaga, a voting rights attorney with the Texas Civil Rights Project. Maradiaga recounted her experience at a redistricting hearing in Houston, where nearly 1,000 individuals signed up to speak despite the maps not yet being released. “People showed up anyway,” she noted, emphasizing the community’s concern over the lack of transparency in the process.

Maradiaga criticized the current redistricting efforts as being driven by political pressures rather than the needs of the community or census data. “This process should be open and fair,” she stated. “Instead, it’s being driven by a letter from the DOJ under Trump.”

She also addressed the misconception surrounding partisan gerrymandering, clarifying that while Republicans assert it is legal, the Supreme Court has not endorsed it. “The Supreme Court didn’t say it’s OK. It said it’s not their job to fix it. That’s a big difference,” she explained. Maradiaga is currently pursuing legal challenges against the redistricting efforts, including a case in Tarrant County where a predominantly minority district was dismantled, resulting in the removal of a Black woman commissioner from office. “We’re fighting back,” she affirmed. “Because this is about protecting the right to vote.”

Melissa Ayala, a longtime activist and resident of Congressional District 29, shared her personal experiences regarding the impact of the new maps on her community. “We’re a working-class, mostly Latino district,” she said. “Now they’ve redrawn it into a weird box that favors Republicans. It’s clear parts we were left out on purpose.”

Ayala, who previously worked as a census worker, understands the importance of accurate representation. “I learned about redistricting through the census. But now, even older folks are just learning how it works—and how it affects them,” she remarked. She highlighted the economic pressures that hinder families from staying politically engaged, stating, “Groceries are up. Cars are expensive. People are just trying to survive. But we still need to vote. We still need to organize.”

Her message was clear: “We’re not just voters—we’re also on the menu. If we don’t fight back, we’ll be served up.”

Carmela Walker, Program Manager at the Houston Area Urban League, emphasized the high stakes for Black communities in this redistricting battle. “This isn’t just about race—it’s about humanity,” Walker said. “When you lose your voice, you lose your ability to fight for schools, healthcare, safety—everything.”

Walker shared troubling accounts of families facing mistreatment in schools and communities without representation. “We got a call about a mom who was arrested just for sitting with her child in the cafeteria. That’s what happens when you don’t have representation,” she recounted.

She called for unity and civic education, asserting that fairness is a civic value that transcends partisanship and race. “No one’s coming to save us. We have to save ourselves,” she urged, emphasizing the need for community solidarity.

Despite the grim outlook, the speakers at the briefing remained united in their call to action: stay engaged, stay vocal, and keep voting. In closing remarks, Wu advocated for “trigger laws” in blue states like California to counter Texas’s redistricting moves. Maradiaga reiterated the importance of litigation, while Ayala urged for more town halls and grassroots organizing. Walker reminded attendees that “we’re stronger together.”

Source: Original article

Democrats Debate Israel-Hamas Conflict and Dark Money at DNC Meeting

August 26, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Democratic Party officials gathered in Minnesota for their annual meeting, facing internal divisions over the Gaza war and campaign finance reforms while emphasizing unity against former President Donald Trump.

Democratic Party officials and committee members convened in Minnesota on Monday for their annual summer meeting, where they engaged in discussions about competing positions regarding the ongoing war in Gaza and the need for campaign finance reforms.

The meeting commenced with a call for unity against former President Donald Trump, despite the underlying tensions within the party. “We are unified towards one single goal: to stop Donald Trump and put this country back on track,” declared DNC Chair Ken Martin to the more than 400 elected officials from all 50 states and seven territories.

While the Democrats appeared to rally around the objective of countering Trump’s controversial actions since his return to the White House, divisions among committee members were anticipated to surface during the discussions scheduled for Tuesday.

On the agenda was the ongoing conflict in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, alongside the issue of limiting dark money in presidential politics. The DNC’s Resolutions Committee was set to meet, where competing symbolic resolutions regarding the Gaza war would be voted on. This conflict was ignited by Hamas’s surprise attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, which resulted in nearly 1,200 Israeli deaths and over 250 hostages taken. In the aftermath, Israel’s military response has led to the deaths of over 60,000 Palestinians.

The Democratic Party’s historically strong support for Israel has begun to fracture amid rising concerns over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, particularly among the party’s progressive base. Recent polling indicates a significant decline in support for Israel’s military actions among Democrats.

One resolution, which Martin supports, calls for a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas. In contrast, a competing resolution advocates for an arms embargo and the suspension of U.S. military aid to Israel, a long-standing ally in the Middle East.

Another resolution expected to generate significant debate is Martin’s proposal for the DNC to reaffirm its commitment to eliminating unlimited corporate and dark money in the presidential nominating process, starting with the 2028 cycle. This initiative aims to create a new panel that will propose enforceable measures to curb the influence of dark money in the party’s primary elections.

As the influence of super PACs, which can accept unlimited contributions but must disclose their donors, has grown in recent election cycles, the call for reform has gained traction among party leaders.

Democratic leaders are gathering at a critical time for the party, which is attempting to recover from significant electoral losses in the previous year. The Democrats lost control of the White House and Senate and fell short in their efforts to regain a House majority. Additionally, Republicans have made gains among voter demographics that were once key to the Democratic base.

The situation has only worsened for the Democrats in the ten months following those electoral setbacks. The party’s brand has become increasingly unpopular, particularly among younger voters, as national surveys show approval ratings at all-time lows. The DNC is also facing a substantial fundraising deficit compared to the Republican National Committee (RNC), with voter registration data indicating a decline in Democratic Party registrations while GOP sign-ups have increased in 30 states that register voters by party.

Amid these challenges, Martin and other party leaders emphasized the importance of unity. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz addressed committee members, stating, “There’s a division in my damn house, and we’re still married, and things are good. That’s life… We are strong because we challenge each other.”

Longtime Democratic strategist and DNC committee member Maria Cardona echoed this sentiment, expressing frustration over the focus on internal conflicts. “I’m so sick of people focusing on the infighting and the circular firing squad. All of that is crap when we have real issues, existential threats that we need to fight about, and we are all united on that front and that’s all that matters,” she said.

Martin, who was elected DNC chair in February, has navigated considerable turmoil during his tenure, including controversy surrounding former vice chair David Hogg’s support for primary challengers against older House Democrats in secure blue districts.

In response to the DNC’s summer meeting, RNC communications director Zach Parkinson criticized Martin’s leadership, stating, “Under Ken Martin’s leadership, Democrats have sunk to their lowest approval rating in 35 years.” He added that Republicans view Martin’s leadership positively, suggesting they would endorse him to continue as DNC Chair.

Source: Original article

Hungry Families and Military Spending: Scrutiny of Pakistan’s Priorities

August 26, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Nation, Politics 0

Pakistan’s recent launch of its third Hangor submarine highlights a stark contrast between rising defense spending and the growing hardships faced by its citizens amid soaring food prices and electricity costs.

The Pakistan Navy celebrated the launch of its third Hangor-class submarine at Wuhan’s Wuchang Shipyard on August 15, 2025. While naval officials hailed the event as a significant milestone in the modernization of the country’s underwater warfare capabilities, many Pakistanis viewed it as a troubling juxtaposition. The billions allocated for foreign-built submarines come at a time when households are grappling with soaring food inflation, increasing electricity tariffs, and diminishing purchasing power.

The Hangor submarine deal, signed in 2015, is estimated to cost between USD 5 billion and USD 6 billion. Under this agreement, four of the eight submarines will be constructed in China, while the remaining four will be assembled at Karachi Shipyard, utilizing a transfer-of-technology package. However, as fiscal constraints tighten, the trade-off between expensive prestige projects and the daily survival of citizens has become increasingly difficult to overlook.

In the federal budget for FY2025–26, Pakistan allocated PKR 2.12 trillion for defense, marking a 14% increase from the previous year. In stark contrast, the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP), the country’s flagship welfare initiative, received only a 7% increase, bringing its total to PKR 460 billion. Development spending under the Public Sector Development Programme remained stagnant at PKR 1.25 trillion.

Debt servicing is projected to consume an astonishing PKR 9.6 trillion this year, surpassing the combined expenditures for development and welfare. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) noted in its March 2025 staff review that Pakistan’s policy framework continues to emphasize fiscal consolidation, with energy subsidy reform as a central component. This has led to increased fuel and electricity tariffs and tighter social spending, even as military allocations continue to grow.

The impact of these economic pressures is most acutely felt in households across the nation. Data from the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics revealed that food inflation reached 20.3% year-on-year in June 2025, with overall inflation at 17.4%. The prices of essential commodities such as wheat, sugar, and cooking oil have surged, pushing 42.3% of the population below the poverty line, according to the World Bank. The World Food Programme further reported that 82% of households are unable to afford a healthy diet, with food expenses constituting more than half of average household budgets.

Electricity tariffs have risen by more than 45% since 2023, as determined by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority. This increase has forced families to ration their power usage amid ongoing rolling blackouts. The launch of a submarine in Wuhan stands in stark contrast to the candle-lit homes and long bread queues in cities like Karachi and Lahore, highlighting the disparity between military ambitions and civilian struggles.

For the leadership in Pakistan, the Hangor submarines symbolize strategic resolve and military advancement. Naval officials assert that these submarines will enhance underwater endurance and strengthen deterrence capabilities in the Arabian Sea. However, critics point out that despite three launches, the timelines for operational induction remain uncertain, the engines are untested in export scenarios, and achieving operational readiness could take years.

Analysts have also raised concerns about the disparity between the capabilities promised by the Hangors and India’s existing anti-submarine warfare capabilities. The Indian Navy currently operates 12 P-8I Poseidon patrol aircraft, four Kamorta-class corvettes, and a squadron of MH-60R Seahawks, which were commissioned in 2024. Additionally, the INS Arnala, a shallow-water anti-submarine warfare craft, was inducted in June 2025. For Islamabad, the undersea arms race is an expensive endeavor, while New Delhi has already accounted for its maritime defense needs.

The launch on August 15 not only provided a headline for Pakistan’s Navy but also intensified the divide between elite priorities and the pressing needs of the public. As households struggle with food insecurity, rising tariffs, and dwindling reserves, the funds flowing out for Chinese shipyards raise questions about national priorities.

“The scale of Hangor expenditures has no direct parallel among recent naval procurements, yet exact costs have not been disclosed by authorities,” noted Naval News following the Wuhan event. The lack of transparency, combined with the evident opportunity costs, places relentless pressure on ordinary families.

In 2025, the reality for many in Pakistan is a stark one: hungry families and expensive submarines.

Source: Original article

Ajit Agarkar Faces Scrutiny Over Shubman Gill’s Asia Cup Selection

August 23, 2025 Staff ReporterCricket, Election, Sports 0

Shubman Gill’s selection as vice-captain for the Asia Cup has sparked debate, given his lack of recent T20I appearances despite a stellar performance in the England Test series.

Shubman Gill has been named vice-captain for the upcoming Asia Cup, a decision that has raised eyebrows among cricket analysts and fans alike. Despite not having played in T20 Internationals recently, Gill’s impressive form in the Test arena has caught the attention of selectors.

During the recent Test series against England, Gill showcased his batting prowess, amassing over 750 runs. His performance included several match-winning innings, which solidified his reputation as a key player in the longer format of the game. However, the transition from Tests to T20s can be challenging, and some critics question the wisdom of selecting a player who has not been active in the T20 format lately.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) selectors have faced scrutiny for their choices in recent tournaments, with many arguing that past performances in one format do not necessarily guarantee success in another. Gill’s selection as vice-captain has reignited discussions about the criteria used by the selectors when forming the squad.

Supporters of Gill argue that his exceptional Test form should not be overlooked, and that his ability to adapt to different formats could prove beneficial for the team. They point to his technical skills and temperament, which are vital in high-pressure situations typical of international tournaments.

On the other hand, critics emphasize the importance of recent form in the T20 format, suggesting that players who have consistently performed in T20s should be prioritized. This perspective highlights the need for selectors to balance experience with current performance metrics when choosing a squad for a major competition like the Asia Cup.

The debate surrounding Gill’s selection reflects broader concerns about the BCCI’s approach to team selection. As the Asia Cup approaches, all eyes will be on how the team performs, and whether Gill can translate his Test success into the shorter format of the game.

As cricket fans await the tournament, the discussions around player selection are likely to continue, with many eager to see if Gill can rise to the occasion and justify the selectors’ faith in him.

According to NDTV, the conversation surrounding Gill’s selection is emblematic of the ongoing challenges faced by the BCCI selectors in balancing past performances with current form.

Source: Original article

The Mystery of Mysterious Shipment Emails in Your Inbox

August 23, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, Technology 0

Receiving unexpected order confirmations may indicate that your email address is being exploited in fraudulent operations targeting various retailers.

In recent months, an increasing number of individuals have reported receiving shipment confirmation emails for purchases they did not make. These emails typically originate from legitimate retailers, often in the sportswear or electronics sectors, and include real tracking numbers and delivery details. However, the products are shipped to different names and addresses, while the buyer’s contact email is the recipient’s.

This phenomenon might initially appear to be a simple clerical error or a case of someone mistyping an email address. Yet, when it occurs repeatedly across multiple unrelated orders, it raises concerns about a more sinister tactic at play. Arthur, a resident of Cape Coral, Florida, shared his experience, which reflects the frustrations of many others: “My wife’s email address is showing up in emails from various sports entities to notify her of shipping dates, etc. So far, three separate individuals have ordered products, shipped to a different name at a different address, but used her email as the contact. They didn’t use our credit card to place the order. What could be going on? I don’t believe it’s a coincidence.”

Arthur’s suspicions are well-founded. Scammers are increasingly using real email addresses to facilitate fraudulent purchases through retailer systems that have fewer verification checks. They exploit the trust associated with legitimate email addresses to carry out their schemes, even if they have not compromised the victim’s payment details.

It is improbable that someone is accidentally entering your email address every single time. Instead, scammers are deliberately using valid, active email addresses to circumvent retailer fraud filters. Numerous sources indicate that fake order and shipping confirmation emails are a common tactic in fraud operations, with criminals taking advantage of the trust systems built around legitimate email addresses.

When a stolen credit card is used, pairing it with a real email address that has not triggered spam alerts significantly increases the likelihood that the transaction will go unnoticed by anti-fraud systems. Retailers often verify whether an email address is active or bounces. If the system detects a functioning address, it may be less suspicious than an obviously fake one.

Once an order is placed, products are frequently sent to drop addresses or freight-forwarding services, as confirmed by official investigations into brushing scams. These services act as intermediaries, complicating the tracing of fraudulent activities. In this context, your email serves merely as a means to an end—a validated contact point that aids the operation’s progression.

Your email address may have fallen into the hands of scammers through several common methods. The most likely cause is a data breach. Many well-known companies have experienced leaks where customer emails and other information were exposed. Once your email is part of a leaked database, it often circulates on the dark web or in underground forums, where it is traded and reused. Even if you were not directly involved in a breach, scammers frequently employ a technique known as credential stuffing. This method involves testing stolen login details across various websites to confirm which email addresses are active.

To mitigate the risk of falling victim to such scams, consider investing in a data removal service. While no service can guarantee the complete removal of your data from the internet, these services can help monitor and automate the process of removing your information from numerous sites over time.

Implementing a few straightforward yet effective measures can help protect your inbox, safeguard your identity, and stay ahead of scammers misusing your email. Start by securing your email account with a strong, unique password that you do not reuse elsewhere. Enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) adds an extra layer of security, ensuring that hackers cannot access your account even if they have stolen your password. A password manager can simplify this process by generating and securely storing complex passwords, reducing the risks associated with password reuse.

Regularly check if your email has been exposed in past breaches. Many password managers include built-in breach scanners that can alert you if your email address or passwords have appeared in known leaks. If you discover a match, promptly change any reused passwords and secure those accounts with new, unique credentials.

Periodically scan your inbox for order confirmations, shipping notices, or account sign-ups that you do not recognize. If something seems suspicious, report it directly to the retailer or platform, as it may be part of a larger scam utilizing your email address. Avoid clicking on dubious links, even if the message appears legitimate, and protect your devices with robust antivirus software to catch threats before they escalate.

To further safeguard yourself from malicious links that could install malware and compromise your private information, ensure that you have antivirus software installed on all your devices. This protection can also alert you to phishing emails and ransomware scams, keeping your personal information and digital assets secure.

Avoid entering your email on questionable giveaway sites or dubious online forms. When in doubt, skip the sign-up or use a temporary email address. The fewer places your email is exposed, the more challenging it becomes for scammers to access it.

Consider establishing a dedicated email account for online purchases, newsletters, and subscriptions. This approach helps keep your primary inbox organized and makes it easier to identify unusual activity. Creating various email aliases can also be beneficial, allowing you to manage incoming communications while minimizing the risk of data breaches. An email alias can forward messages to your primary address, simplifying your email management.

Even if no purchases appear under your name, receiving order confirmations for items you did not buy can be a warning sign of potential identity theft. Set up alerts with your bank and consider enrolling in a credit monitoring service to detect unauthorized activity early.

If you are receiving order confirmations for items you did not purchase, do not dismiss it as a mere inconvenience. Your email is likely being misused as part of a larger fraud operation, not by accident but intentionally. Scammers are capitalizing on active, trustworthy email addresses to slip past retailer defenses and execute unauthorized purchases. The repeated use of your email indicates that fraud networks are already circulating it, even if your financial information remains secure.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Second Term Could Lead to Extreme Immigration Overhaul

August 23, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Politics 0

New report reveals that the Trump administration’s recent immigration policies threaten the foundations of American democracy, marking a significant overhaul of the U.S. immigration system.

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 23, 2025 — A special report released today provides a comprehensive analysis of the Trump administration’s first six months back in office, highlighting a dramatic transformation of the U.S. immigration system that poses a serious threat to the foundations of American democracy. While some voters may have favored a tougher stance on immigration when supporting Trump, the report illustrates how the administration’s extreme measures extend far beyond mere policy changes, undermining the rule of law itself.

Titled *Mass Deportation: Analyzing the Trump Administration’s Attacks on Immigrants, Democracy, and America*, the report was published by the American Immigration Council on July 23. It details how the administration has launched a radical, multi-faceted assault on immigrants and the immigration system.

The report outlines a series of aggressive actions that include restricting entry into the United States, removing legal protections for individuals already residing in the country, and escalating enforcement efforts to unprecedented levels. In doing so, the Trump administration has dismantled long-standing legal safeguards, disregarded the authority of Congress and the judiciary, and weaponized government resources against immigrants and dissenters alike.

“This isn’t just a hardline immigration agenda,” said Nayna Gupta, policy director at the American Immigration Council and co-author of the report. “It’s a wholesale effort to use immigrants and the U.S. immigration system to attack core tenets of our democracy and exercise unchecked executive power to realign the American government around exclusion and fear.”

Among the key findings highlighted in the report are several alarming developments:

The end of asylum has effectively occurred, with the administration shutting down the CBP One application without offering any alternative. Asylum-seekers arriving at ports of entry are routinely turned away, and many face indefinite detention even after winning their cases.

The refugee program has been decimated, with the administration indefinitely suspending the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, except for a select group of white South Africans who have been fast-tracked under questionable claims of persecution. This has left tens of thousands of approved refugees stranded abroad.

A mass revocation of legal status has taken place, with the administration aggressively rescinding humanitarian parole and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) from over a million individuals in just six months. This has stripped many of their work permits and pushed them into undocumented status.

The administration has also weaponized bureaucracy, creating significant obstacles for legal immigration pathways through massive fee increases, processing freezes, and opaque barriers that make it nearly impossible for lawful applicants to obtain or maintain their status.

The aggressive enforcement tactics employed by the Trump administration have instilled a pervasive atmosphere of fear and chaos among immigrants of all legal statuses. Individuals now live in constant anxiety over their safety in the United States, as anyone can be targeted for arrest, detention, and deportation, even in sensitive locations such as churches, schools, and courthouses.

Furthermore, the administration is orchestrating a radical reorganization of law enforcement resources, establishing an unprecedented cross-agency immigration operation that draws on manpower from various federal and state law enforcement agencies and the U.S. military. This effort prioritizes immigration enforcement above all other public safety and law enforcement objectives.

Additionally, the Trump administration’s “Big Beautiful Bill Act,” enacted in July, has turbocharged an already inhumane detention system by increasing ICE’s detention budget by 308 percent annually. This sets the stage for a drastic expansion of a detention system that has already subjected tens of thousands of immigrants to life-threatening conditions.

The report also includes powerful firsthand accounts from individuals affected by these policies. Ilia, a nonbinary Russian dissident, won their asylum case in court but remained in detention for over a year without a release date. Axel, a DACA recipient and youth leader, is abandoning his job to return to school amid uncertainty regarding his legal status. Beatriz, an immigrant lawyer advocating for noncitizen children, has encountered cases reminiscent of her own journey to the U.S., including a confused six-year-old who appeared in court without representation. Kaelyn is incurring debt to prevent her partner from being deported to El Salvador’s megaprison under the Alien Enemies Act.

The report warns that while some policies may shift in response to legal challenges, the administration’s overarching agenda remains clear: to permanently redefine who belongs in America and how power is wielded by the federal government.

“The administration’s policies are reshaping the immigration system in ways that are unfair, unlawful, and out of step with core American values,” said Dara Lind, senior fellow at the Council and co-author of the report. “We’re witnessing real harm to families, communities, and the rule of law, and the public deserves to understand what’s at stake.”

The full report is available for review, and interviews with experts and individuals impacted by these policies can also be arranged.

Source: Original article

Bhisham Sahni’s ‘Tamas’ Explores the Roots of Awful Events

August 23, 2025 Staff ReporterCulture, Election, Politics 0

Bhisham Sahni’s novel ‘Tamas’ serves as a poignant reminder of how easily communal violence can erupt, reflecting on the tragic history of the Indian Partition.

“History repeats itself, first as tragedy, and then as farce.” This famous quote by Karl Marx encapsulates the essence of Bhisham Sahni’s 1979 award-winning novel, Tamas. The book is a dark satire that explores the horrific riots that erupted during the partition of India and Pakistan, a tumultuous period marked by violence and chaos as the British colonial rule came to an end after nearly 200 years.

Despite being published over four decades ago, Tamas remains strikingly relevant in today’s political climate. The recurring themes of human hubris, greed, and the manipulation of communal identities resonate deeply in contemporary society. As tensions rise in various parts of the world, Sahni’s work serves as a cautionary tale about the ease with which communities can be pitted against one another.

Recently reprinted by Penguin Classics and translated by Daisy Rockwell, Tamas includes an insightful introduction that sheds light on Sahni’s motivations for writing the novel. He penned this poignant narrative thirty years after experiencing the brutal riots of partition firsthand, aiming to highlight the cyclical nature of violence and hatred.

Tamas chronicles the slow build-up to a communal riot in a small town in Northern India, set against the backdrop of partition. The story ignites with the butchering of a hog, an act that serves as a catalyst for the ensuing chaos. As the narrative unfolds, readers are struck by the parallels between the events depicted in the novel and the current global landscape, where political leaders exploit religious and communal loyalties for their gain.

Interestingly, the novel lacks a central character to anchor the plot. Instead, the riot itself emerges as the primary protagonist, illustrating how violence can arise from seemingly innocuous beginnings, much like a tornado forming out of a clear sky.

In her introduction, Rockwell notes that Sahni was compelled to write Tamas due to witnessing the cycle of hatred he had lived through during partition, which continued to manifest in communal riots in independent India. “The unseen hands may change, the location may change, the match that lights the tinder may change, but the formula remains chillingly familiar,” she writes. The novel offers profound insights into the fallacy of viewing riots as spontaneous events. Whether in Lahore or Washington, D.C., riots are rooted in decades of institutional violence and social injustice.

The narrative begins with Nathu, a local chamar, who is reluctantly tasked with butchering a hog. Despite the financial incentive, Nathu is unprepared for the gruesome task, which sets off a chain reaction of events that will alter the lives of many in the town. Sahni’s ability to weave dark humor into the grim subject matter allows readers to engage with the story without being overwhelmed by despair.

Throughout the novel, Sahni introduces a diverse cast of characters, each contributing to the unfolding drama. Among them are the British administrator Richard, whose manipulative nature exacerbates tensions; his wife Lisa, who struggles with her own demons; and members of the local Congress Committee and Muslim League, who represent the polarized political landscape. The narrative also features the well-meaning but ultimately ineffective Communist volunteer, Deb, who attempts to bridge the divide between the feuding factions.

As friendships that once flourished crumble under the weight of suspicion and misinformation, the novel illustrates how quickly trust can erode. The Hindu and Muslim communities, once neighbors and allies, find themselves at odds, fueled by rumors and the machinations of those in power. The British administrators exploit these divisions to their advantage, creating an atmosphere ripe for conflict.

The conclusion of Tamas provides a darkly comedic commentary on human nature, revealing the absurdities people employ to mask their guilt and erase painful memories. Despite the serious subject matter, Sahni’s sharp wit shines through, prompting readers to reflect on the complexities of human behavior in times of crisis.

In an era where there are concerted efforts to rewrite history, books like Tamas are more important than ever. They illuminate the mechanisms that can ignite violence and the fragility of peace, reminding us of the lessons that must not be forgotten.

TAMAS
By Bhisham Sahni
Translated with an Introduction by Daisy Rockwell
Foreword by Siddhartha Deb
Penguin Classics Trade Paperback (July 15, 2025)
ISBN: 9780143138051

Bhisham Sahni received the Sahitya Kala Academy award for Tamas in 1975. The novel was also adapted into a multi-episode series for India’s government-run television platform, Doordarshan, captivating audiences, particularly in Northern India, where the impact of partition was most acutely felt. The series, directed by Govind Nihalani and featuring Om Puri as Nathu, was later released as a four-hour feature film available on YouTube.

Source: Original article

Pallavi Joshi Analyzes Mithun Chakraborty’s Political Journey in India

August 23, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, India, Politics 0

Actress-producer Pallavi Joshi reflects on her experiences with veteran actor Mithun Chakraborty, highlighting his multifaceted career and surprising political insights.

MUMBAI – Actress and producer Pallavi Joshi is eagerly anticipating the release of her upcoming film, ‘The Bengal Files’. In a recent discussion, she shared her experiences working alongside the veteran actor Mithun Chakraborty.

Joshi described Chakraborty as an enigma, noting that she perceives three distinct personalities within him. “There is a disco dancer. Then there is an actor who has been performing roles like Ramkrishna Paramhansa. And then there was a beautiful film I had seen of his called ‘Titli’, which was directed by Aparna Sen. He was amazing in that film,” she stated.

She emphasized Chakraborty’s versatility as a star, acknowledging his deep understanding of his craft. “He did not really care about acting so much in those films, just concentrated more on his dance and everything. And then there are some films which he has done purely for money. And yet, there is also that actor who won the National Award for ‘Mrigya’. He’s a three-time national award winner. For somebody who has gone the full spectrum, there is so much to learn from him,” Joshi said.

Joshi expressed her admiration for Chakraborty, who was recently honored with the Dadasaheb Phalke Award, India’s highest accolade in cinema. She remarked, “His entire demeanor is that of a star. So, when he sits down and starts talking, it’s Mithun Chakraborty, the star who’s sitting there in front of you. When he opens his mouth, it is a very well-read person who speaks to you. And then when he starts telling you a few things about what you should be doing in this film, it’s that cinematic nerd inside him who understands cinema so well. He’s giving you those suggestions.”

Chakraborty’s political journey has also been noteworthy, spanning the full spectrum from left to right. He was involved in the Naxalbari movement during his youth but distanced himself from it following a family crisis. After graduating from the Film and Television Institute of India, he rose to superstardom and ventured into politics, initially joining the Trinamool Congress (TMC), a party positioned at the center-left of the political spectrum. He later transitioned to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), a right-wing political entity.

While Joshi has not engaged in extensive discussions with Chakraborty regarding politics, she has been impressed by what she has heard. “He surprises me with his deep understanding of cinema. Politics, of course, I’ve never really had a chance to discuss with him. I’m not really very interested in that aspect. But I’m sure he’s had conversations with Vivek. I’ve overheard some of them. And I’m just blown away by that man. And to have him as your co-actor in the same frame, it sometimes feels surreal,” she added.

As ‘The Bengal Files’ prepares for its release, Joshi’s reflections on Chakraborty highlight not only his artistic talents but also the depth of his character and experiences.

Source: Original article

Debate Over D.C. Statehood Intensifies Amid Trump’s Local Police Authority

August 23, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Democrats are renewing calls for Washington D.C. statehood as President Trump asserts control over the district’s police force, reigniting a long-standing debate about representation and governance.

The debate over Washington D.C. statehood has intensified as President Donald Trump continues to exert authority over the district’s police force. This situation has prompted House and Senate Democrats, along with D.C.’s non-voting delegates, to argue that if D.C. were a state, the president would not have the power to federalize its police force.

Last week, Trump invoked a provision of the Home Rule Act, which grants some autonomy to the nation’s capital, to effectively take control of the Metropolitan Police Department. This move was framed as a response to rising crime rates, leading to an increased presence of federal law enforcement agencies and the National Guard on the streets of D.C. The White House has highlighted rapid decreases in crime and numerous arrests since the federal takeover.

However, critics argue that the president’s actions represent an overreach of power and underscore the need for D.C. to achieve statehood. Currently, Washington D.C. lacks voting representation in Congress and is overseen by Congress despite having its own mayor and city council. Senator Paul Strauss, the district’s shadow senator, emphasized that if D.C. were a state, the president would not be able to impose such control outside of the federal enclave.

Strauss, who has long advocated for D.C. statehood, expressed concern that the current crackdown ignores the self-determination of D.C. residents. “It would be one thing if we actually had a crime emergency here, but we don’t,” he stated. “Violent crime in particular is down to 30-year lows. That’s not what’s happening here. He is using these national guardsmen and women as a stunt, and that’s wrong.”

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D.C.’s non-voting delegate in the House, echoed Strauss’s sentiments. “The president’s abuses are evidence of the urgent need for D.C. statehood so that more than 700,000 D.C. residents can finally have the full rights and privileges afforded to other Americans, including control of their own local resources and policies,” she said in a statement.

In response, White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers countered that violent crime in the district has “been spiraling out of control.” She accused Democrats of misleading the public regarding crime levels in the nation’s capital. “If they needed some anecdotal evidence, they could ask their own Democrat colleague about the time he was carjacked outside of his D.C. apartment by three armed criminals,” she remarked.

Lawmakers from neighboring Virginia and Maryland joined Strauss and Norton in arguing that Trump’s federalization of the local police highlights the urgent need for D.C. statehood. Senator Tim Kaine, D-Va., described the police takeover as a prime example of why D.C. deserves the same rights as states. Senator Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., criticized Republicans for playing political games with the district’s funding while supporting what he termed an authoritarian overreach by the president.

Van Hollen has announced plans to reintroduce a bill alongside Norton to grant statehood to D.C. He, Norton, and Representative Jamie Raskin, D-Md., have also introduced a joint resolution in the House aimed at halting Trump’s takeover of the D.C. police.

Raskin pointed out that residents of Washington D.C. are uniquely disenfranchised, being the only citizens in a capital city worldwide without representation in their national legislature. “The people of Washington have petitioned for statehood and should be admitted as a state rather than treated as a MAGA-colonized populace,” he stated.

Despite the renewed push for statehood, the likelihood of achieving this goal remains slim while Republicans control both chambers of Congress and the presidency. Strauss noted, “I think there’s probably not a pathway to get this done while Republicans control all three branches of the government. They have shown that they’re more interested in the partisan impact of controlling the legislative branch and not really interested in the principle of self-determination for Washington, D.C. residents.”

The ongoing debate over D.C. statehood continues to reflect broader issues of representation and governance in the United States, with many advocates arguing that the residents of the nation’s capital deserve the same rights as those in the states.

Source: Original article

Extreme Heat Poses Significant Risks for Vulnerable Seniors, Expert Warns

August 22, 2025August 22, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Health 0

Extreme heat poses significant health risks for seniors, potentially accelerating biological aging and leading to severe complications, according to gerontologist Dr. Macie Smith.

The summer heat can be challenging for anyone, but it presents heightened risks for seniors. Recent research published in the journal *Science Advances* indicates that extreme heat may accelerate “biological aging” in older adults, raising concerns about its long-term health implications.

Dr. Macie P. Smith, a licensed social worker and gerontologist based in South Carolina, discussed the relationship between heat and aging in an interview with Fox News Digital. She emphasized that seniors are particularly vulnerable to dehydration, which, when combined with extreme heat, can create a “recipe for disaster,” leading to serious health issues such as heatstroke.

“Dehydration is one of the most common reasons our seniors are hospitalized,” Smith noted. Many seniors may not drink enough water, often due to a desire to avoid frequent urination. Additionally, the natural sense of thirst tends to diminish with age.

“Just because they’re not thirsty doesn’t mean they don’t need to hydrate themselves,” Smith said. “They still need to be well-hydrated, especially during extreme heat.” Certain medications commonly prescribed to seniors, such as diuretics, can exacerbate dehydration.

Dehydration can also lead to urinary tract infections (UTIs), which can severely affect seniors, sometimes mimicking symptoms of late-stage dementia or Alzheimer’s disease. Smith highlighted that signs of dehydration include dry mouth, an inability to produce tears, and clammy skin.

“From sun-up to sundown, you want to be sure that you are drinking and eating foods that will keep you well-hydrated and not put yourself at risk of hospitalization,” she advised.

As seniors age, they typically experience reduced body and muscle mass, thinner skin, and a diminished ability to regulate body temperature. The effects of extreme heat can strain the body physically, cognitively, and emotionally. “Stress ages people prematurely,” Smith remarked, noting that the impact of heat extends to brain function as well.

Despite these challenges, many seniors remain active, which is to be encouraged. However, Smith stressed the importance of timing activities to avoid the hottest parts of the day. “We want to be sure that seniors are doing the bulk of their activities during the morning hours before the extreme heat hits, which could be as early as 11 a.m.,” she said. This advice is particularly relevant for seniors living in warmer regions of the U.S., such as Florida or Las Vegas.

Smith also recommended that seniors check the forecast before going to bed to prepare for the next day’s temperatures. “Test your cooling system regularly to make sure it works,” she advised, noting that there are grant programs available to help seniors maintain proper cooling systems in their homes.

For caregivers and family members of seniors, Smith suggested regularly checking in to ensure that loved ones are living in a comfortable environment and staying properly hydrated. “You want to find creative ways to be respectful and to ensure their independence while also helping them maintain a healthy lifestyle,” she said. “This all helps them to age well and not prematurely.”

As extreme heat continues to pose risks, awareness and proactive measures are essential for safeguarding the health of seniors during the summer months.

Source: Original article

Punjab Police Detain Sunil Jakhar Amid AAP’s Halt of BJP Camps

August 22, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics 0

Punjab Police detained BJP chief Sunil Jakhar in Abohar after the Aam Aadmi Party halted the BJP’s outreach campaign, leading to protests across the state.

Chandigarh: Punjab BJP chief Sunil Jakhar was detained by the Punjab Police in Abohar on Thursday. This action followed an order from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government to halt the BJP’s outreach campaign titled “BJP de sewadar aa gaye ne tuhade dwar.” The initiative aimed to raise awareness about various central welfare schemes but was suspended statewide due to government directives. Several BJP leaders were also taken into custody across different districts.

Jakhar was leading one of the outreach camps in Abohar when he was detained, along with local leaders and party workers. He strongly condemned the police action, labeling it as “state terrorism,” and accused the Bhagwant Mann government of misusing police resources to prevent the BJP from engaging with the public. In response to the crackdown, Jakhar called on party workers to gather in Raipura for a protest on Friday.

The AAP government justified its decision by alleging that BJP functionaries were illegally collecting sensitive information, including Aadhaar details, ration cards, and bank information, in violation of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. In addition to detaining Jakhar and others, police confiscated campaign materials and obstructed further camps in several villages.

This incident has ignited a political firestorm in Punjab. Congress MLA Sandeep Jakhar visited Fazilka to show support for the detained BJP workers, while Punjab Congress president Amrinder Singh Raja Warring accused both AAP and BJP of orchestrating a “fixed match” to undermine Congress in the state.

In the wake of these events, BJP workers organized protests in Ludhiana and other towns, claiming that citizens were being denied benefits from key schemes such as Ayushman Bharat and PM-Kisan. This confrontation has intensified the already volatile political atmosphere in Punjab, with parties ramping up their rhetoric as electoral politics heats up.

Source: Original article

Shah Rukh Khan Reflects on Zero’s Reception at Aryan Khan’s Event

August 21, 2025 Staff ReporterBollywood, Election, Entertainment 0

Shah Rukh Khan humorously addressed the mixed reception of his 2018 film *Zero* during an event for his son Aryan Khan, advising against repeating past mistakes.

Shah Rukh Khan, the celebrated Bollywood actor, recently took a light-hearted approach to discussing his 2018 film *Zero*, which featured him in the role of a dwarf. The film, directed by Aanand L. Rai, received a mixed response from both audiences and critics upon its release.

During an event celebrating his son Aryan Khan, Shah Rukh made a playful remark that resonated with the audience. He humorously advised, “Ullu bana lena, zero mat banana,” which translates to “Make a fool of yourself, but don’t make a zero.” This quip not only showcased his sense of humor but also reflected his awareness of the film’s reception.

*Zero* was ambitious in its storytelling, exploring themes of love and self-acceptance through the lens of a man with dwarfism. Despite its star-studded cast, which included Anushka Sharma and Katrina Kaif, the film struggled to connect with viewers, leading to discussions about its shortcomings.

Shah Rukh’s ability to laugh at himself and his past projects has endeared him to fans, and his comments at Aryan’s event were no exception. The actor’s candidness about his career missteps highlights a refreshing perspective in an industry often marked by serious public personas.

As he continues to navigate his career, Shah Rukh Khan remains a beloved figure in Indian cinema, known for both his iconic roles and his relatable personality. His willingness to engage with his audience through humor is a testament to his enduring appeal.

According to NDTV, Shah Rukh Khan’s remarks serve as a reminder that even the most successful actors face challenges and that humor can be a powerful tool in addressing them.

Source: Original article

Ex-Pakistan Star Comments on Shreyas Iyer’s Asia Cup Exclusion

August 21, 2025 Staff ReporterCricket, Election, Sports 0

Shreyas Iyer’s exclusion from the Asia Cup 2025 squad has drawn significant criticism from both fans and former cricketers.

Shreyas Iyer’s absence from the Asia Cup 2025 squad has become a topic of heated discussion among cricket enthusiasts and analysts alike. The decision has not only raised eyebrows but has also led to a wave of criticism directed at the selectors.

Fans have taken to social media to express their disappointment, arguing that Iyer’s recent performances warranted a place in the squad. His ability to anchor innings and play crucial roles in tight situations has made him a valuable asset to the Indian cricket team.

Former cricketers have also weighed in on the matter, with many questioning the rationale behind the selection committee’s decision. They believe that Iyer’s experience and skill set could have significantly contributed to the team’s success in the tournament.

Critics have pointed out that Iyer’s form leading up to the Asia Cup was commendable, making his exclusion all the more perplexing. The Asia Cup is a prestigious tournament, and having a player of Iyer’s caliber could have provided India with a competitive edge.

In discussions surrounding the selection process, some former players have suggested that if Iyer were part of a different cricketing culture, he might have been treated differently. They argue that in other cricketing nations, players with similar track records would likely have been retained despite any recent setbacks.

This sentiment reflects a broader conversation about how players are evaluated and selected for national teams. The pressure of performance, especially in high-stakes tournaments, often leads to tough decisions that can leave fans and players alike feeling frustrated.

As the Asia Cup approaches, the focus will remain on how the Indian team performs without Iyer. His absence will undoubtedly be felt, and it remains to be seen how the selectors will justify their decision if the team struggles in the tournament.

Overall, the debate surrounding Shreyas Iyer’s omission highlights the complexities of team selection in cricket and the passionate responses it can evoke from fans and analysts alike.

Source: Original article

Bill Proposed to Dismiss Jailed Chief Ministers in India

August 21, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Nation India, Politics 0

The Lok Sabha witnessed intense protests as Union Home Minister Amit Shah introduced the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, which proposes the removal of jailed Prime Ministers, Chief Ministers, and ministers from office.

The Lok Sabha erupted in protests yesterday when Union Home Minister Amit Shah introduced the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill. This proposed legislation stipulates that the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and ministers could be removed from office if they are jailed for more than 30 days for offenses that carry a jail term of over five years.

The Opposition quickly condemned the bill, labeling it “draconian” and “unconstitutional.” They accused the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of planning to misuse central agencies to target non-BJP Chief Ministers, imprison them, and destabilize state governments. In contrast, the government defended the bill, asserting it aims to “elevate the declining moral standards” and uphold integrity in politics.

Upon closer examination, the motivations behind the bill reveal a complex narrative. A constitutional amendment requires passage in both Houses of Parliament by a two-thirds majority. Currently, the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) lacks the necessary numbers to secure this without support from a key opposition party, such as the Congress. Given the current political climate, the Opposition appears unwilling to cooperate, raising questions about the government’s decision to introduce a bill it may not be able to implement in its current form.

The Constitution Amendment Bill seeks to amend three articles in the Constitution of India—Articles 75, 164, and 239AA. It states that any minister, Chief Minister, or Prime Minister who is arrested and remains in custody for over 30 days due to an accusation of an offense punishable by a jail term of five years or more shall be removed from office. Notably, this removal can occur based solely on an allegation, without the necessity of a conviction. Furthermore, the law allows for the possibility of reappointment to high office after the individual’s release.

The bill’s “statement of objects and reasons” emphasizes that elected representatives embody the hopes and aspirations of the Indian populace. It stresses that these officials should rise above political interests and act solely in the public interest. The draft legislation argues that a minister facing serious criminal allegations and detention may undermine constitutional morality and good governance, thereby eroding public trust.

During the introduction of the bill, the Lok Sabha experienced chaotic scenes, with some members tearing up documents and throwing them at the Home Minister. Opposition parties have long accused the government of misusing central investigative agencies, claiming that this new legislation would further push India toward a “police state.” Senior Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra described the bill as “draconian,” asserting that presenting it as an “anti-corruption measure” is merely a smokescreen.

Trinamool Congress leader Abhishek Banerjee criticized the legislation, suggesting its true intention is to maintain power and control without accountability. Similarly, Shiv Sena (UBT) accused the government of attempting to “end democracy and individual freedom,” warning that it could lead the country toward dictatorship. AIMIM chief and Hyderabad MP stated that the government is intent on creating a police state, arguing that this bill would be the “final nail in the coffin” for elected governments.

The timing of the bill’s introduction is also noteworthy, occurring just before the conclusion of the Monsoon Session. The government indicated that the bill would be sent to a Joint Parliamentary Committee, suggesting a lack of urgency in getting it passed. This approach is unusual, as contentious legislation is typically forwarded to committees after being introduced, rather than before. The Chair has decided to have the bill examined by a Joint Committee comprising 21 Lok Sabha members and 10 Rajya Sabha members, appointed by the respective leaders of both Houses. This process is likely to prolong the discussion surrounding the bill.

The debate in the Lok Sabha became personal at one point, with Congress leader KC Venugopal referencing Shah’s arrest during his tenure as Gujarat Home Minister in 2010. Shah responded by emphasizing the importance of moral values in governance, asserting that he had resigned before his arrest and that those facing serious charges should not occupy constitutional positions.

For a constitutional amendment to pass, it must secure a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament before being sent to the President for assent. The Lok Sabha currently has 542 members, requiring a minimum of 361 votes for a two-thirds majority. The NDA, with its strength of 293, would need significant support from non-aligned parties to reach this threshold. The situation in the Rajya Sabha mirrors this, as the Upper House has 239 members, necessitating 160 votes for a two-thirds majority. The NDA’s current tally of 132 votes falls short of this requirement, indicating that the bill cannot clear Parliament without the Opposition’s backing.

Even if the bill were to pass through Parliament, it would face further challenges. The legislation impacts the federal structure of the country and would require approval from at least half of the states and Union Territories. However, the BJP’s dominance in many states may facilitate this process. Additionally, the bill could face legal challenges in the Supreme Court, as several MPs have argued it contradicts the basic structure of the Constitution and undermines the principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty.’

Given these numerous obstacles, one might question the rationale behind the government’s introduction of such a contentious law. The answer may lie in a strategic perception battle. The Opposition has been vocal in criticizing the government over various issues, including allegations of vote theft in Bihar. By introducing this legislation, the government may aim to frame the Opposition’s protests as resistance to an anti-corruption initiative and a reluctance to promote cleaner politics.

Moreover, the Opposition’s likely boycott of the Joint Parliamentary Panel could provide the ruling BJP with further ammunition to criticize Congress and its allies for opposing a law intended to penalize criminality in politics. Trinamool MP Mahua Moitra has suggested that the government lacks the necessary numbers to pass the bill, asserting that its introduction serves to divert attention from the Opposition’s campaign against alleged vote manipulation.

When questioned about the bill’s intent, government sources indicated that the objective is to spotlight corruption in politics. They cited the case of former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who did not resign following his arrest, highlighting a lack of clarity in the Constitution regarding whether an arrested minister is required to step down. The government refrained from introducing such legislation immediately following the Kejriwal incident to avoid appearing politically motivated. However, with the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) ousted from power in Delhi, the timing appears more favorable.

Sources within the government have stated that the bill’s passage is not the primary concern; rather, the goal is to place the Opposition under scrutiny. If they oppose the bill, it could send a message that they are comfortable with individuals running ministries from jail. Additionally, government representatives have countered allegations that the law could be used to target non-BJP Chief Ministers through central agencies, asserting that arrests follow due process and individuals can seek judicial relief at any time.

Source: Original article

Meitei Organization Voices Concerns Over Agricultural Department Exam Questions

August 21, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Nation, Politics 0

The Meitei Heritage Society has raised concerns over a controversial exam question in the Agricultural Development Officer Examination, leading to its cancellation by the Assam Public Service Commission.

In a significant development, the Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) has cancelled a question from a recent examination after the Meitei Heritage Society expressed concerns that it unfairly portrayed the Meitei community. The contentious question was part of the Agricultural Development Officer Examination, which took place on August 10.

The Meitei Heritage Society, which advocates for the Meitei community, submitted a formal representation to the APSC highlighting their grievances. In their communication, they stated, “We write to express our deep concern regarding a disturbing and misleading question included in the Agricultural Development Officer Examination conducted by the Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) on August 8, 2025.”

The specific question in question, identified as Question No. 95 of Series A, and its equivalents in other series, referenced the ongoing violence in Manipur. The Society argued that the question selectively maligns the Meitei community by depicting Meitei groups as perpetrators of rights abuses. They emphasized that this portrayal neglects the severe atrocities, killings, and displacements that the Meitei people have suffered at the hands of Chin-Kuki militants and their civil society organizations.

The Society further criticized the inclusion of such a question, asserting that it is “unbecoming of a Public Service Commission, whose mandate is to recruit public servants committed to fairness, impartiality, and service to the nation without prejudice.”

In response to the controversy, the APSC has denied any malicious intent behind the inclusion of the question regarding the violence in Manipur. The Commission maintains that its objective is to ensure a fair examination process and uphold the integrity of the selection process for public service roles.

This incident has sparked a broader discussion about the representation of communities in educational and examination materials, particularly in sensitive contexts such as ongoing conflicts. The Meitei Heritage Society’s actions highlight the importance of ensuring that all communities are portrayed accurately and fairly in public examinations.

As the situation continues to develop, the implications of this incident may extend beyond the examination itself, potentially influencing how future questions are framed and the considerations that public service commissions take into account when developing examination content.

According to The Sunday Guardian, the cancellation of the question reflects the ongoing tensions in Manipur and the need for sensitivity in addressing issues related to community representation.

Source: Original article

Naveen Chawla’s Influence Resurfaces Amid Congress’s Opposition to Kumar

August 21, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, Politics 0

The Congress party is intensifying its campaign against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, drawing parallels to the controversial tenure of former election commissioner Naveen Chawla in 2009.

New Delhi: The Congress-led INDIA bloc is launching a vigorous campaign against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, even considering an impeachment motion amid allegations of voter fraud and perceived bias toward the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Kumar has faced sharp criticism from opposition leaders after he indirectly challenged Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi to submit an affidavit or apologize for his repeated claims of “vote chori” in states like Karnataka, Maharashtra, and Haryana.

The opposition’s offensive against the Election Commission, particularly targeting Kumar, has drawn comparisons to events from 2009. At that time, the Congress party was in power at the Centre, and election commissioner Naveen Chawla, who later became the CEC, faced an unprecedented attempt by his superior, CEC N. Gopalaswami, to remove him due to alleged closeness to the Congress leadership.

The 2009 general elections, conducted in five phases starting on April 16, were held against the backdrop of the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, which exposed the weaknesses of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government in handling terrorism. Public outrage, fueled by insensitive remarks and actions from Union ministers, created a strong anti-UPA sentiment. Despite this, the UPA managed to secure a second term.

Chawla’s tenure was marred by allegations of partisanship, particularly regarding his ties to the Nehru-Gandhi family. The most notable rebuke came from within the Election Commission itself. On January 31, 2009, Gopalaswami recommended Chawla’s removal to the President of India without consulting fellow Election Commissioner S.Y. Quraishi.

This recommendation followed a meeting between Gopalaswami and a small NDA delegation in his chambers, where they accused Chawla of acting in a partisan manner to favor the Congress party. Gopalaswami alleged that Chawla had shared sensitive Election Commission information with Congress officials and had opposed issuing a notice to Congress president Sonia Gandhi regarding honors she received from Belgium—a complaint that Chawla and Quraishi had dismissed in a two-to-one majority.

Gopalaswami’s action marked a rare instance of a CEC publicly seeking the removal of a fellow commissioner, effectively accusing him of undermining the Commission’s impartiality. However, President Pratibha Patil rejected the recommendation, allowing Chawla, a 1969 batch IAS officer, to assume charge as CEC on April 20, 2009, and oversee the parliamentary elections.

Chawla’s tenure had long been controversial. The Shah Commission, led by former Chief Justice of India J.C. Shah, had declared him “unfit to hold any public office which demands an attitude of fair play and consideration for others” due to his role as a senior official in the 1970s. Although the Delhi High Court dismissed the Commission’s findings, the stigma attached to Chawla lingered.

Even before Gopalaswami’s intervention, the NDA had targeted Chawla. In March 2006, led by the BJP, the NDA submitted a memorandum to President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, signed by over 200 MPs, demanding Chawla’s removal as election commissioner. The government rejected this demand. In May 2006, Jaswant Singh, then Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, approached the Supreme Court for Chawla’s ouster, citing his ties with Congress politicians and issues related to the MPLADS scheme. This petition was later withdrawn after Gopalaswami asserted his authority to remove an election commissioner, although the Court left the questions open.

Despite the anti-UPA wave following the 26/11 attacks, the Congress-led alliance won the 2009 elections. No definitive evidence of electoral malpractice emerged, and party leaders maintain that the elections were fair, reflecting voter priorities such as economic policy.

Source: Original article

BJP Gears Up for High-Stakes Indian-American VP Election

August 18, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Nation India, Politics 0

The upcoming Vice Presidential election in India is generating significant speculation regarding the strategies of the ruling BJP and the opposition INDIA bloc.

New Delhi: The upcoming Vice Presidential election is shaping up to be a compelling political contest, with both the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA) and the opposition INDIA bloc poised to announce their candidates in the coming days. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has convened a parliamentary party meeting today, while the opposition plans to hold its strategy session a day later, on Monday.

Indications from the BJP suggest that the party is likely to nominate a candidate with a background in the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). A critical question remains whether the nominee will come from a forward caste or a backward community.

On the opposition front, it is almost certain that the Congress party will announce the candidate on behalf of the INDI Alliance. The decision looms over whether Congress will field a Jat leader, aiming to capitalize on farmer politics following the resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar, or if it will opt for a different face altogether.

The potential for a Jat nominee has gained significance, especially after the opposition accused the BJP of being “anti-Jat” in light of Dhankhar’s exit. While the BJP appears to have a secure path to victory given its numbers, the opposition is expected to use this election as an opportunity for political messaging and to rally sympathy.

This election unfolds against the backdrop of a combative monsoon session of Parliament, during which the united opposition has repeatedly disrupted proceedings. This turmoil has forced the government to pass key bills amid chaos, and the remaining days of the session are anticipated to be equally tumultuous.

The election schedule is already established. The last date for nominations is August 21, coinciding with the final day of the monsoon session, while polling is set for September 9. Notably, the NDA plans to file its nomination on August 21, with all BJP Members of Parliament (MPs), Chief Ministers, and allies instructed to be present in Delhi. The ruling coalition aims to showcase its unity while also courting neutral parties such as the Biju Janata Dal (BJD), YSR Congress, and Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS).

Numerically, the BJP’s position appears robust. Out of 782 MPs in both Houses, the BJP and its allies command the support of approximately 425 MPs—well above the halfway mark. This stronghold suggests that the NDA faces no significant obstacles to securing victory. The party’s focus, however, is on expanding its margin, with aspirations to replicate or exceed the scale of Jagdeep Dhankhar’s win in 2022.

In the previous election, the BJP successfully garnered support from neutral and opposition parties. The Trinamool Congress (TMC) abstained from voting, while parties such as the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), BJD, and YSR Congress extended their support to Dhankhar, allowing him to secure over 500 votes. In contrast, Congress candidate Margaret Alva was backed by only 182 MPs.

However, the political landscape has shifted since then. The BJP has strengthened its position in the Rajya Sabha, while the opposition has consolidated its power in the Lok Sabha under Congress’s leadership. Recently, Congress has engaged in “dinner diplomacy” to draw both TMC and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) closer, ensuring their participation in joint opposition initiatives.

The opposition is particularly united in its resistance to the revision of the Bihar voter list under the SIR system, which has become a rallying point for parties like TMC and AAP that seek to appeal to Muslim voters.

Neutral parties, however, remain a wildcard in this equation. In states like Odisha, Andhra Pradesh, and Telangana, the SIR issue holds little relevance, making the BJD, BRS, and YSR Congress less likely to align with the opposition. Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Jagan Mohan Reddy has recently accused his rival, Chandrababu Naidu, of colluding with Rahul Gandhi, further complicating the prospects of opposition alignment. While sudden shifts in political dynamics cannot be entirely ruled out, current signals suggest that these neutral players may ultimately support the NDA or choose to abstain.

The core question, therefore, is not whether the BJP’s candidate will win, but by what margin. The party is eager to secure a decisive mandate that surpasses Dhankhar’s victory, thereby reinforcing its image of political dominance and unity. Conversely, the opposition is determined to leverage the contest to highlight its own consolidation, particularly emphasizing Jat representation and farmer politics.

As the deadline for nominations approaches, the atmosphere is charged with speculation. This election promises to be less about the outcome and more about the political messaging from both sides.

Source: Original article

Omar Abdullah Launches Signature Campaign for Jammu and Kashmir Statehood

August 18, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Nation, Politics 0

Omar Abdullah has launched a signature campaign across Jammu and Kashmir, advocating for the restoration of statehood while reflecting on the challenges faced since the region’s transition to a Union Territory.

Srinagar: On the morning of Independence Day, Omar Abdullah, the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, stood once again at Bakshi Stadium. Eleven years prior, he had addressed the gathering as the elected head of a state. This time, however, he spoke as the Chief Minister of a Union Territory.

Abdullah’s address diverged from the usual themes of development and celebration, as he announced the start of a signature campaign. “For the next eight weeks,” he declared, “we will travel across all 90 constituencies. We will go to every village and every mohalla. We will ask for one thing—the restoration of statehood.”

The campaign, he emphasized, was not about seeking power or position. “If we fail, I will accept that. But I believe the people want their state back. We will take these signatures to Delhi, to the court. Only then will I rest,” he stated, underscoring the urgency of the initiative.

Before delving into the campaign, Abdullah expressed his condolences regarding the recent cloudburst in Kishtwar, which resulted in over 60 fatalities and left more than 100 injured. He noted that rescue operations were still ongoing and promised government support for the victims’ families. He also pledged to investigate any potential administrative lapses, saying, “We owe that to the people.”

Midway through his address, Abdullah reflected on the significant changes that had occurred since he last stood at the stadium. “I was confused about what to say,” he admitted. “The last time I stood here, I was Chief Minister of a state. We had an Assembly that made decisions and a Cabinet that implemented them. We had our flag, our constitution, and our laws.”

He paused before adding, “Today, I am Chief Minister of a Union Territory.” Abdullah explained that the difference was not merely nominal but practical. “Cabinet decisions are passed, but many don’t get cleared. Some files don’t return. Some disappear.”

Despite assurances that the transition to a Union Territory would be smooth, he confessed, “It is more difficult than I thought.” Abdullah pointed to a recent observation by the Supreme Court, stating that the bureaucracy must answer to the government, and the government must answer to the people. “But here, that chain is broken,” he said, highlighting the disconnect between the administration and the electorate.

He argued that officials are not accountable to the elected government, which exacerbates the gap between the administration and the people. “This UT system cannot function in its current form. If the government is elected, then it must have the right to govern,” he asserted.

Addressing a recent Supreme Court hearing on statehood, Abdullah recalled references to the Pahalgam attack, stating, “We were told that the Pahalgam incident cannot be ignored. I agree. But should we be punished for it again?” He reminded the audience that the attackers had already been dealt with under Operation Sindoor. “Now that same attack is being used to delay statehood. This was not the fault of an elected government. Over the years, we reduced such incidents not by chance, but by hard work.”

He stressed that the people of Jammu and Kashmir have consistently stood with victims, never with attackers. “This should not be used as an excuse to deny us our rights,” he said emphatically.

Abdullah highlighted various achievements in areas such as youth schemes, health, and education. He noted that the Assembly had passed resolutions on Article 370, development funds, and local governance. However, he acknowledged that their impact has been limited. “We are accountable to the Assembly, and MLAs are accountable to the people. But where is the accountability of the administration?”

He recognized that many had hoped for a positive announcement from New Delhi this Independence Day. “Even I hoped. But nothing came. Again,” he lamented, his voice softening as he asked the audience, “Are we better now? After six years of silence, are we?”

There was no reply from the crowd, underscoring the sentiment of disappointment.

As he concluded his speech, Abdullah outlined the plan for the signature campaign, which will reach all 20 districts. Party workers and representatives will go door-to-door, collecting signatures and thumb impressions from those unable to write. “We have tried everything—letters, meetings, resolutions,” he said. “Now we will visit every Assembly segment, every household. No individual will be left out.”

He reminded the audience that the Supreme Court had set an eight-week timeline for deliberations on statehood. “We will not let these weeks go to waste. This is the people’s cause, and we will take it forward together,” he concluded, rallying support for the initiative.

Source: Original article

Sunil Jakhar Calls for ECI Investigation into AAP Policy Decisions

August 18, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, Politics 0

Sunil Jakhar, President of the BJP Punjab, has called for an investigation by the Election Commission into alleged undemocratic practices by AAP leader Manish Sisodia following a controversial speech.

Chandigarh: In a notable development, Sunil Jakhar, the President of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in Punjab, has formally requested the Election Commission of India to take action against Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Manish Sisodia. This request follows the emergence of a viral video in which Sisodia purportedly advocates for winning elections “by hook or by crook,” a statement that Jakhar claims promotes undemocratic methods and violates Indian laws.

In his letter to the Election Commission, Jakhar highlighted that Sisodia made these remarks on the eve of Independence Day, a day symbolizing national unity. During his speech, Sisodia, who oversees AAP’s operations in Punjab, mentioned employing tactics such as ‘Saam, Daam, Dand, Bhed, Sach, Jhooth, Sawaal, Jawaab, Ladai, Jhagda’ to secure victory in the upcoming 2027 Punjab Assembly elections. Jakhar condemned these remarks as a mockery of the values of peace, freedom, and integrity, indicating a clear intention by AAP to undermine the democratic process.

Jakhar elaborated on the implications of these terms in his correspondence:

“Saam” refers to the potential misuse of government machinery to pressure or coerce voters.

“Daam” indicates the use of money, bribery, and other enticements to buy votes, which constitutes a corrupt practice under election laws.

“Dand” warns of threats and punishment against those who refuse to support AAP, representing undue influence and coercion.

“Bhed” suggests a dangerous strategy to create communal, caste-based, or social divisions, potentially disrupting peace and harmony in Punjab.

“Sach” and “Jhooth” imply the deliberate use of lies and misinformation to mislead voters.

“Sawaal” and “Jawaab” represent the possibility of twisting facts and confusing voters during public discourse.

“Ladai” and “Jhagda” promote violence and physical confrontations to silence opposition and instill fear.

Jakhar asserted that these statements pose a threat to the peace, development, and prosperity of Punjab. He argued that they provide clear evidence of an intent to engage in corrupt practices, intimidate voters, incite hostility, and disturb public order. According to Jakhar, these actions constitute serious offenses under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, including bribery under Section 123(1), undue influence under Section 123(2), and promoting enmity under Section 123(3A).

Additionally, Jakhar’s letter references offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), such as promoting enmity between various groups (Section 196), making statements against national unity (Section 197), and instilling fear through illegal threats (Section 353).

He emphasized that such behavior is classified as a corrupt practice, warranting disqualification from contesting elections under Section 8. Jakhar further noted that these actions violate the Constitution of India, undermining the principles of free and fair elections and the democratic rights of citizens as guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21.

In his appeal to the Election Commission, Jakhar urged immediate action, calling for a swift investigation and strict punitive measures against Sisodia and AAP for their overt declaration of winning elections through corrupt, unconstitutional, and illegal means. He has demanded that a First Information Report (FIR) be filed against Sisodia’s statements, which he argues are tantamount to offenses under both the Representation of the People Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Furthermore, Jakhar has called for Sisodia’s disqualification from future elections in India and a prohibition on his ability to deliver political or public speeches, citing the serious threat his behavior poses to the integrity of elections, social unity, and the democratic framework.

Source: Original article

Rahul Gandhi Launches ‘Voter Adhikar Yatra’ Amid Bihar Poll Concerns

August 18, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, Politics 0

Rahul Gandhi launched a 1,300-km ‘Voter Adhikar Yatra’ in Bihar, accusing the BJP and the Election Commission of manipulating votes to influence the upcoming state elections.

On Sunday, Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, inaugurated the 1,300-km ‘Voter Adhikar Yatra’ from Sasaram, Bihar. The event was attended by prominent leaders from the Mahagatbandhan, including Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief Lalu Prasad Yadav.

During the launch, Gandhi and other Mahagatbandhan leaders alleged that the Election Commission was colluding with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to manipulate voter rolls and “steal” the elections. The Voter Adhikar Yatra, which spans over 21 districts, is a coordinated campaign aimed at highlighting what the coalition describes as “vote chori” amid the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

At the flag-off rally, Rahul Gandhi asserted that elections across the country were being undermined through deliberate tampering. He claimed, “The BJP is altering names in Bihar’s electoral rolls to fix the Assembly polls. When I exposed this manipulation, I was asked to file an affidavit, but BJP leader Anurag Thakur, who made similar claims, faced no such demand from the poll panel.”

Gandhi further criticized the Election Commission, stating, “They are openly siding with the BJP,” and emphasized that the INDIA bloc would fight to protect the voting rights of the people.

Tejashwi Yadav, also addressing the rally, directed his criticism towards Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Election Commission. He stated, “Narendra Modi has ruined the lives of Bihar’s youth, and the Election Commission is helping him cheat voters. Do not think of Biharis as weak.” Yadav invoked the ideals of socialist leader Ram Manohar Lohia and Babasaheb Ambedkar, asserting that the Constitution guarantees every citizen’s vote is equal, regardless of their wealth.

Yadav also took a jab at the Prime Minister, declaring that outsiders would no longer be able to deceive the people of Bihar, and that they would soon be defeated.

Kharge echoed these sentiments, asserting that the BJP-led government posed a direct threat to the Constitution. “As long as the Modi-led government remains in power, people’s rights are unsafe. Even the vote is not secure, and the Election Commission is behaving like an extension of the ruling party,” he stated.

In Aurangabad, Rahul Gandhi intensified his criticism of the Nitish Kumar-led government, claiming that police had set up barricades to obstruct their access to the public meeting venue. “We didn’t fear and we walked, which made the police step back, allowing us to reach our stage to address you all,” he said.

Lalu Prasad Yadav, known for his witty remarks, criticized the BJP, labeling them as “thieves” intent on damaging democracy. “They are stealing people’s votes and destroying the Constitution. Remove these thieves, unite, and defeat them. Rahul Gandhi and Tejashwi must uproot them and save democracy,” he urged in his impassioned speech.

Gandhi also raised the issue of a caste census, accusing the Modi government of making its recent announcement under political pressure. “They will never conduct a genuine caste census nor remove the 50 percent cap on reservations. The INDIA bloc will conduct a real census and bring down this wall of injustice,” he asserted.

The launch of the yatra saw participation from various opposition leaders, including Dipankar Bhattacharya from CPI(ML) Liberation, Subhashini Ali from CPI(M), P Santosh Kumar from CPI, and others such as Pappu Yadav, KC Venugopal, Bhupesh Baghel, and Krishna Allavaru.

As the yatra commenced from Sasaram’s Biada ground, Tejashwi Yadav drove a specially customized jeep carrying Rahul Gandhi. Other alliance leaders joined them as the procession made its way to Dehri on Sone. Both leaders stood on the rooftop of the vehicle to greet the crowd before continuing to Aurangabad for another public meeting.

The Voter Adhikar Yatra is set to traverse Bihar over the next 16 days, with scheduled breaks on August 20, 25, and 31. The campaign will culminate in a major rally at Patna’s historic Gandhi Maidan on September 1, where Rahul Gandhi, Lalu Prasad Yadav, Tejashwi Yadav, and Kharge will collectively address the public.

Source: Original article

India’s Asia Cup 2025 Squad Announcement Sparks Selection Drama

August 18, 2025 Staff ReporterCricket, Election, Sports 0

Fans across India are eagerly anticipating the announcement of the squad for the Asia Cup 2025, set to commence on September 9.

The excitement is palpable as cricket enthusiasts in India await the announcement of the national squad for the upcoming Asia Cup 2025. Scheduled to begin on September 9, the tournament promises to be a thrilling showcase of cricketing talent.

The Asia Cup is a prestigious tournament that brings together the best teams from the continent, and India’s participation is always a focal point for fans. With the event just around the corner, speculation about the squad selection has intensified.

As the selection meeting approaches, discussions among fans and analysts have been rife with predictions about which players will make the cut. The team management faces the challenging task of balancing experience with youth, as they aim to field a competitive side.

In recent years, India has seen a mix of seasoned players and emerging talents, and this trend is expected to continue. The selectors will likely consider players’ recent performances in domestic and international formats, as well as their fitness levels.

With the Asia Cup serving as a crucial platform for teams to prepare for larger tournaments, including the World Cup, the stakes are high. Fans are not only interested in who will be selected but also in the strategies that the team management will employ to ensure success.

As the countdown to the squad announcement continues, cricket lovers are keeping a close eye on any hints or leaks regarding the potential lineup. The anticipation surrounding the announcement reflects the deep passion for cricket in India and the significance of the Asia Cup in the cricketing calendar.

In the coming days, as the official announcement is made, the cricketing community will be eager to dissect the selections and discuss the implications for India’s campaign in the tournament.

As the excitement builds, fans are encouraged to stay tuned for live updates on the squad announcement, which promises to be filled with drama and surprises.

According to Source Name, the final squad will be revealed shortly, and it is expected to generate significant discussion among fans and analysts alike.

Source: Original article

Badshah’s Team Refutes Claims of Pakistan Link in Dallas Show

August 18, 2025 Staff ReporterCulture, Election, Entertainment 0

Badshah’s team has clarified that his upcoming Dallas show is not linked to Pakistan, emphasizing that the rapper uses music as a bridge between cultures.

Indian rapper Badshah is facing scrutiny regarding his upcoming performance in Dallas, Texas. A film industry organization has issued a letter to the artist, requesting clarification about the alleged sponsorship of the event by a Pakistani company.

The inquiry stems from concerns raised about the nature of the sponsorship and its implications. In response, Badshah’s team has firmly denied any connection to Pakistan regarding the Dallas show, asserting that the rapper’s music transcends borders and serves as a unifying force.

Badshah, known for his chart-topping hits and vibrant performances, has built a reputation for using his platform to connect with diverse audiences. His team emphasized that the Dallas concert is intended to celebrate music and culture, not to promote any political agenda.

The rapper’s commitment to bridging cultural divides through music has been a hallmark of his career. His fans appreciate his ability to blend various musical influences, creating a unique sound that resonates with people from different backgrounds.

As the date of the Dallas show approaches, Badshah’s team remains focused on delivering an unforgettable experience for attendees. They are confident that the concert will highlight the positive impact of music in fostering understanding and unity among different communities.

According to reports, Badshah’s team is prepared to address any further questions or concerns regarding the event’s sponsorship and its implications. They maintain that the focus should remain on the celebration of music rather than any external controversies.

In a world where music often serves as a bridge between cultures, Badshah continues to exemplify this ethos through his work. His Dallas show promises to be a testament to the power of music in bringing people together, regardless of their backgrounds.

Source: Original article

Kharge Criticizes BJP for Alleged Immorality in Pursuit of Power

August 16, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics 0

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge criticizes the BJP for alleged voter roll manipulation, emphasizing the need to protect democracy and announcing Rahul Gandhi’s upcoming Voter Adhikar Yatra.

New Delhi: Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge recently launched a pointed critique of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accusing it of undermining democracy through alleged manipulation of voter rolls. His remarks came during a flag hoisting ceremony at the party’s new headquarters, Indira Bhawan, where he was joined by Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, and other senior party leaders.

Kharge expressed concern over the Election Commission’s decision to remove the names of 6.5 million voters in Bihar as part of a special intensive revision of voter rolls. He questioned the integrity of this exercise, stating, “The BJP did not have any objection to names of 65 lakh people being omitted from the electoral rolls, and this shows who benefitted from the SIR exercise.”

He emphasized that the struggle is not merely about winning elections but about preserving India’s democracy and upholding the Constitution. “The foundation of Indian democracy is free and fair elections,” Kharge said, referencing Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s assertion that no eligible voter should be excluded from electoral rolls due to prejudice.

During his speech, which was cut short by heavy rain, Kharge took aim at the BJP’s tactics, suggesting that the ruling party would go to any lengths of immorality to maintain its grip on power. He claimed that significant irregularities in elections are surfacing, alleging that the SIR process has led to the wrongful removal of opposition votes and the erroneous declaration of living individuals as deceased.

Kharge further criticized the Election Commission for its lack of transparency, noting that it has not provided explanations for the removal of voter names. He expressed gratitude to the Supreme Court for demanding that the Election Commission disclose the names of those omitted from the rolls.

He referenced a press conference held by Rahul Gandhi on August 7, where evidence of electoral irregularities was presented, highlighting discrepancies in vote counts between the Congress and the BJP in various assembly segments. “This is not just a challenge for Congress; it is a challenge for the world’s largest democracy,” he stated.

Kharge urged party leaders to meticulously analyze and verify the voter rolls at every polling booth, encouraging them to investigate how many names have been removed, declared dead, or shifted to different booths under suspicious circumstances. He also raised concerns about the potential for fraudulent voter registrations and the practice of sending new voter lists on polling day, which he described as a tactic to confuse candidates.

He asserted that these actions represent a conspiracy by the opposition, promising that the Congress party would expose these malpractices. To facilitate this, Kharge announced the establishment of a dedicated website for sharing information about electoral irregularities, inviting citizens from across the country to contribute their experiences.

In closing, Kharge reiterated that the fight is not solely about electoral victory but about safeguarding democracy and the Constitution. He invoked the legacy of prominent leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhash Chandra Bose, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, and Maulana Azad, urging party members to honor their dreams and fight for the values they represented.

Additionally, Kharge announced that Rahul Gandhi would embark on a Voter Adhikar Yatra starting August 17, aimed at raising awareness about these issues. “You all have to make it a huge success,” he urged party supporters.

Source: Original article

Centre Cancels ₹800 Crore Road Projects in Punjab Due to Delays

August 14, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Nation 0

The Centre has cancelled road and bridge projects worth over ₹800 crore in Punjab under the PMGSY-III scheme, citing delays in construction and tendering processes.

Chandigarh: The Central Government has officially cancelled road and bridge projects valued at ₹828.87 crore that were allocated to Punjab under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY-III). This decision was made due to delays in the tendering process and the commencement of construction, further straining the already financially burdened state government.

This cancellation marks a significant setback for Punjab, which is grappling with the Centre’s earlier decision to withhold over ₹7,000 crore in Rural Development Fund (RDF) grants. These funds are crucial for rural infrastructure development and road repairs across the state.

Documents reviewed by The Sunday Guardian reveal that the PMGSY-III allocation for Punjab included plans for upgrading 64 roads covering a total of 628.48 kilometers, along with the construction of 38 bridges, each exceeding 15 meters in length. The total projected cost for these initiatives was ₹828.87 crore, and the state was mandated to initiate work on these projects by March 31.

However, officials from the Punjab Public Works Department (PWD) indicated that 59 of the proposed works were designed to utilize Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) technology. This specialized technique is only available through a limited number of consultancy firms in India. A senior PWD officer explained, “As per the conditions outlined in the sanction letter, tenders for hiring a consultancy firm were issued multiple times, but we could only finalize one on May 29, after our fourth attempt.”

Additionally, another package, which includes four roads and 35 bridges sanctioned in March 2025, is still in the tendering phase, with construction expected to begin this month.

PWD officials have expressed concerns that cancelling these projects at this stage could incite public discontent, particularly in areas where road conditions are already poor. “Many of these roads are located in the border districts of Amritsar, Gurdaspur, Pathankot, and Tarn Taran, and were highlighted by local MPs as requiring urgent repairs,” stated a letter from the Punjab PWD to the Secretary of the Union Ministry of Rural Development.

Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann has also reached out to Union Rural Development Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, emphasizing the urgent need to proceed with the construction. “The 38 bridges are intended to be built on roads that have already been completed under PMGSY-III. Without these bridges, the roads will be of little utility,” Mann emphasized in his correspondence.

In response to Punjab’s request for an extension beyond the original March 2025 deadline, the Union Ministry of Rural Development indicated that the deadline has been extended to March 31, 2026, but only for projects that have already been tendered and where construction has commenced. The ministry clarified, “Works that have started on the ground but are not feasible to continue shall be foreclosed. Additionally, projects that have commenced but are unlikely to be completed by March 2026 may also be terminated.”

This situation highlights the growing tensions between the Punjab state government and the Central Government regarding funding for rural infrastructure. Punjab officials have warned that stalled projects could exacerbate road conditions in strategically important and economically significant regions.

Source: Original article

Rahul Gandhi Thanks Election Commission Amid Controversy Over Comments

August 14, 2025August 14, 2025 Staff ReporterCover, Election, Politics 0

Rahul Gandhi criticizes the Election Commission for incorrectly removing living voters from the rolls in Bihar, humorously claiming to have “tea with the dead” as part of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision controversy.

New Delhi: Amid ongoing criticism from the Congress party regarding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls in Bihar, Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, has taken a humorous jab at the Election Commission (EC). He suggested that he has had the peculiar experience of having “tea with the dead” due to the erroneous removal of seven living voters from the electoral rolls.

In a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, Gandhi remarked, “There have been many interesting experiences in life, but I never got the chance to have a sip of tea with ‘dead people.’ For this unique experience, thank you, Election Commission.”

The Congress party issued a statement highlighting that the seven voters in question, who are all very much alive, had shared tea with Gandhi earlier in the day, despite the EC’s SIR listing them as deceased. The individuals—Ramikbal Ray, Harendra Ray, Lalmuni Devi, Vachiya Devi, Lalwati Devi, Punam Kumari, and Munna Kumar—are associated with the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav’s assembly constituency of Raghopur.

The party claimed that these voters were removed from the electoral rolls even though they had completed the necessary paperwork for the SIR process. The Election Commission has not publicly disclosed the lists of individuals it has classified as deceased or migrated.

According to the Congress, their teams on the ground were able to identify these voters only through informal channels at two to three polling booths. “These seven represent only a fraction of unjustly deleted voters in those booths. This is not a clerical error—it is political disenfranchisement in plain sight,” the party asserted.

The Congress further alleged that the SIR exercise is part of a broader strategy to disenfranchise voters ahead of the crucial assembly elections in Bihar. They accused the EC of attempting to remove lakhs of voters from the rolls, dubbing the SIR process as “vote bandi” and a “daylight robbery of votes.”

In light of these developments, the Congress party has intensified its scrutiny of the Election Commission, arguing that the integrity of the electoral process is at stake. The situation has raised concerns about the potential impact on voter turnout and the overall fairness of the upcoming elections.

As the controversy unfolds, it remains to be seen how the Election Commission will respond to these allegations and whether any corrective measures will be taken to address the concerns raised by the opposition.

Source: Original article

Opposition to Select Vice Presidential Candidate by August 18 or 19

August 14, 2025August 14, 2025 Staff ReporterCover, Election, Politics 0

The Congress party is set to finalize its candidate for the vice presidential elections, with Mallikarjun Kharge consulting INDIA bloc partners ahead of the nomination deadline.

New Delhi: The Congress party has confirmed that the Opposition will field a candidate for the upcoming vice presidential elections. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge has been assigned the task of consulting with partners in the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) bloc. A meeting to finalize the candidate is expected to take place by August 18 or 19, according to sources.

The Election Commission has released the schedule for the vice presidential elections, which will commence with nominations starting on August 7. The last date to file nominations is August 21, followed by scrutiny on August 22. Candidates will have until August 25 to withdraw their nominations. The election itself is scheduled for September 9, with counting occurring on the same day.

Top sources within the Congress party have indicated that Kharge is actively engaging in discussions with various leaders from the INDIA bloc to determine a suitable candidate. These telephonic conversations aim to ensure that the chosen candidate embodies the constitutional values and serves as a voice for democracy.

The need for a new vice president arose after Jagdeep Dhankhar unexpectedly resigned on July 21, the first day of Parliament’s Monsoon Session, citing health reasons. His resignation was accepted by President Droupadi Murmu, prompting the Election Commission to announce the timeline for selecting his successor.

As the deadline for nominations approaches, the opposition parties are focused on identifying a candidate who can effectively represent their collective values and priorities. The upcoming meeting is crucial for aligning the interests of the various parties within the INDIA bloc, ensuring a unified front in the electoral process.

With the stakes high in this election, the opposition is keen to present a candidate who not only meets the expectations of their coalition partners but also resonates with the broader electorate.

As discussions continue, the outcome of the INDIA bloc’s deliberations will play a significant role in shaping the political landscape in the lead-up to the September elections.

Source: Original article

Trump Expresses Discontent Over India’s Response to U.S. Tariffs

August 14, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Former diplomat Vikas Swarup discusses U.S. President Donald Trump’s dissatisfaction with India, citing tariffs and geopolitical tensions following recent military conflicts with Pakistan.

U.S. President Donald Trump’s imposition of punitive tariffs on India stems from his frustration over New Delhi’s dismissal of his claimed role in facilitating a peace agreement with Pakistan, according to former diplomat Vikas Swarup. The ex-High Commissioner to Canada emphasized that while the U.S. maintains a tactical relationship with Pakistan, its ties with India remain strategic.

In an interview with the news agency ANI, Swarup praised India’s resilience against U.S. pressure during trade negotiations, asserting that Trump’s tariffs could ultimately lead to increased inflation in the United States.

Swarup explained that Trump’s discontent with India is multifaceted. He noted that Trump perceives India’s membership in BRICS as a challenge to U.S. interests, viewing the group as an anti-American coalition intent on establishing an alternative currency to the dollar. “He feels that India should not be a member of the BRICS,” Swarup stated.

Another point of contention is India’s refusal to acknowledge Trump’s contributions to the ceasefire negotiations following the military conflict in May. New Delhi has consistently maintained that it does not accept external mediation in such matters. The ceasefire was directly negotiated between the armed forces of India and Pakistan, initiated at the request of Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations.

Trump has repeatedly asserted that he played a crucial role in de-escalating tensions between the two nuclear-armed nations, claiming credit for averting a potential nuclear conflict. “He is miffed that India has not acknowledged his role, whereas Pakistan has recognized his contributions and even nominated him for a Nobel Peace Prize,” Swarup remarked.

In early May, India conducted Operation Sindoor in response to a terror attack in Pahalgam, targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Following this, India successfully repelled further Pakistani aggression.

Swarup highlighted that India has resisted U.S. demands for greater access to its agriculture and dairy sectors, viewing Trump’s tariffs as part of a broader strategy to pressure India into compliance. He noted that this tactic also serves as a signal to Russia, as Trump has expressed frustration over President Vladimir Putin’s reluctance to agree to a ceasefire in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

As Trump prepares for a meeting with Putin in Alaska, concerns linger among Kyiv and its allies that the two leaders may attempt to dictate terms for peace in the nearly four-year-long war.

Swarup characterized Trump as a dealmaker who has positioned himself as a peacemaker in various global conflicts, including those in Thailand, Cambodia, Rwanda, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. He believes that the India-Pakistan situation is particularly significant due to the nuclear capabilities of both nations. “From that perspective, Trump feels that he deserves credit,” he said.

He also noted that Trump has expressed a desire to surpass Barack Obama, the only U.S. president to have received the Nobel Peace Prize. “He has made no secret of his longing for that Nobel Peace Prize,” Swarup added, suggesting that a successful ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine could be Trump’s ticket to such recognition.

Regarding the U.S.’s recent warming of relations with Pakistan, Swarup asserted that India’s foreign policy should not be blamed for this shift. He pointed out that Pakistan has successfully lobbied for greater access to U.S. decision-makers, which has influenced the current dynamics. “Pakistan, through some intermediaries, has gotten the ear of the U.S. President,” he said.

Swarup also mentioned Pakistan’s ambitions to become a hub for cryptocurrency, noting that a venture backed by Trump has signed a letter of intent with Pakistan’s crypto council. “I think Pakistan is now trying to position itself as the ‘Crypto King’ of South Asia,” he remarked.

Despite the current tensions, Swarup believes that India remains a vital partner for the U.S., and that the relationship is fundamentally strategic rather than transactional, unlike the U.S.-Pakistan relationship. “I think the relationship with Pakistan right now is very tactical and short-term, primarily motivated by financial gain,” he stated.

He cautioned against viewing the U.S.-Pakistan relationship as indicative of a permanent shift, describing it instead as a temporary phase. “I call it a storm, not a rupture. You just have to wait out the storms. All storms eventually pass,” he said.

Swarup criticized the U.S. for labeling India as a “Tariff King,” pointing out that the U.S. now holds that title with an average tariff of 18.4 percent compared to India’s 15.98 percent. He argued that the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration would ultimately burden American consumers and contribute to rising inflation in the U.S.

“If you cave in to a bully, then the bully will increase his demands,” he warned, asserting that India has made the right choice by maintaining its strategic autonomy. “Our strategic autonomy has been the bedrock of our foreign policy right from the 1950s,” he concluded.

In July, Trump announced a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods, which later escalated to a total of 50 percent due to India’s imports of Russian oil. This move came despite hopes for an interim trade deal that could have mitigated the impact of such tariffs.

Swarup also addressed the implications of India suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, noting that Pakistan is increasingly anxious about its water supply. He suggested that Pakistan’s military leadership is attempting to provoke fears of nuclear conflict to attract international attention. “They are deliberately provoking nuclear blackmail just so that they can catch the attention of the world,” he said.

India’s recent actions against Pakistan, particularly following the Pahalgam attack, have led to heightened tensions, with Pakistan’s military chief making nuclear threats during his visit to the United States.

Source: Original article

Congress to Review 70 LS Seats Lost by Margin of 50,000 Votes

August 13, 2025August 13, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, Politics 0

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi is focusing on 70 Lok Sabha seats where the party lost by less than 50,000 votes, alleging vote theft in the last elections.

New Delhi: The Congress party is intensifying its allegations of vote theft during the last Lok Sabha elections and recent assembly polls, claiming collusion between the Election Commission and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Sources indicate that Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, is concentrating on approximately 70 parliamentary seats across various states where the Congress lost by a margin of less than 50,000 votes.

On August 7, Rahul Gandhi held a press conference in which he specifically addressed the alleged vote theft in Bengaluru Central’s Mahadevpura assembly seat. He claimed that over 100,000 votes were “stolen” through methods such as duplicate entries, fake addresses, and bulk registrations at single locations.

Congress sources revealed that on Tuesday, Rahul Gandhi met with Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge and General Secretary (Organisation) KC Venugopal. This meeting took place just hours before a gathering of the party’s general secretaries, state in-charges, and leaders of various frontal organizations to discuss the alleged vote theft and the need for a special intensive revision of voter rolls.

During the meeting, Gandhi emphasized the importance of investigating the 70 parliamentary seats where the Congress lost by narrow margins. He expressed concerns about the validity of the BJP’s victories in these constituencies, similar to the scrutiny the party has applied to the Bengaluru South Lok Sabha seat.

Additionally, Gandhi advocated for the use of machine-readable voter rolls, a demand he recently raised with the Election Commission. He pointed out that digital formats would facilitate easier verification of the authenticity of voter rolls compared to physical copies. Gandhi expressed surprise at the Election Commission’s refusal to share these digital formats with the Congress party.

In the coming days, Gandhi is expected to hold multiple press conferences to further highlight these issues. During the meeting, Sachin Pilot, the party’s in-charge for Chhattisgarh, cautioned that not all losing candidates should attribute their defeats solely to “vote chori” (vote theft) as a means to deflect from their own shortcomings.

The Congress party has planned a series of events to raise awareness about these allegations. A torch rally, or “mashal juloos,” is scheduled for August 14, followed by a “vote chor, gaddi chod” rally from August 23 to September 14. Additionally, the party will launch a signature campaign against what they describe as widespread vote theft from September 15 to October 15.

During his August 7 press conference, Gandhi referred to the alleged vote theft as “bhayankar chori” (massive theft) and connected it to the SIR (Systematic Voter’s Education and Electoral Participation) exercise in Bihar. The Election Commission has denied these allegations, with officials from Karnataka and Haryana’s election offices requesting Gandhi to provide evidence to support his claims. The Karnataka CEO even asked Gandhi to submit a signed declaration and oath, to which he responded that his public statements could be regarded as an oath.

Gandhi is set to launch his “Matdata Adhikar Yatra” on August 17 in Sasaram, Bihar, to address the alleged vote theft and the SIR exercise by the Election Commission. This yatra will last for approximately 15 days and will include participation from partners in the Mahagatbandhan, such as Tejashwi Yadav from the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD). The campaign will conclude in Ara district.

As the Congress party gears up for these initiatives, the focus remains on the integrity of the electoral process and the validity of the results in the contested constituencies.

Source: Original article

Congress Plans Nationwide Campaign Against Vote Theft in India

August 13, 2025August 13, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, Politics 0

Congress plans nationwide protests, including torch rallies and signature campaigns, to address allegations of vote theft and demand electoral justice.

New Delhi: The Congress party has announced plans for nationwide protests aimed at addressing allegations of vote theft. These protests will take the form of ‘mashal juloos’ (torch rallies), public meetings, and a signature campaign to raise awareness among the public.

The decision was made during a meeting held at the party’s old headquarters, attended by general secretaries, in-charges, and heads of various organizational fronts. The meeting was chaired by Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge and included prominent party leaders such as Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra.

Following the meeting, Congress leader Kanhaiya Kumar spoke to the media, emphasizing the party’s commitment to bringing the issue of vote theft to the forefront. He stated, “Today we had a detailed meeting with Kharge and Rahul Gandhi, where all general secretaries, state in-charges, and frontal organization chiefs were present.” Kumar reiterated that the party is determined to inform the public about the alleged vote theft.

The Congress plans to hold torch rallies at all district headquarters on August 14. Additionally, from August 22 to September 14, the party will conduct rallies under the slogan ‘vote chor, gaddi chor’ (vote thief, throne thief). Following this, from September 15 to October 15, the party will launch a signature campaign aimed at combating what they describe as massive vote theft.

The Congress party has been vocal in its opposition to the alleged extensive vote theft and has also raised concerns regarding the special intensive revision of voter rolls being conducted by the Election Commission in Bihar. The INDIA bloc, which is led by Congress, has been demanding a thorough discussion on this issue in Parliament. Recently, they held a march from Parliament to the Election Commission to further press their demands. However, several Members of Parliament were detained by Delhi Police during this protest.

As the Congress mobilizes its efforts, the party aims to galvanize public support and highlight what they view as critical issues surrounding electoral integrity.

Source: Original article

Gautam Gambhir’s Strategy for Shubman Gill and Rishabh Pant’s Growth

August 13, 2025 Staff ReporterCricket, Election, Sports 0

Gautam Gambhir’s strategic changes to the Indian cricket team have notably enhanced the performances of players like Shubman Gill and Rishabh Pant ahead of the England Test series.

Gautam Gambhir, the former Indian cricketer and current member of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), has implemented a transformative strategy for the Indian cricket team prior to the upcoming Test series against England. This initiative has significantly impacted the performances of key players, including Shubman Gill and Rishabh Pant.

As the team prepares for the challenges posed by the England side, Gambhir’s approach focuses on fostering a robust environment that promotes individual growth and collective success. His insights, drawn from years of experience in international cricket, have been pivotal in reshaping the team’s dynamics.

Under Gambhir’s guidance, both Gill and Pant have shown marked improvement in their gameplay. Gambhir’s emphasis on mental resilience and tactical awareness has encouraged these young players to step up their performances, particularly in high-pressure situations.

Shubman Gill, known for his elegant batting style, has been able to refine his technique further, allowing him to adapt to varying pitch conditions. His recent performances reflect a newfound confidence that Gambhir attributes to the tailored coaching and mentorship provided to him.

Similarly, Rishabh Pant, who has often been a subject of scrutiny due to his aggressive batting approach, has benefited from Gambhir’s strategic insights. The former opener has worked closely with Pant to enhance his decision-making skills, particularly in crucial match situations. This has resulted in a more balanced approach to his batting, making him a more formidable opponent for any bowling attack.

Gambhir’s masterplan extends beyond individual players; it encompasses a holistic vision for the team. By instilling a sense of accountability and encouraging players to take ownership of their roles, he aims to build a cohesive unit that can perform consistently at the highest level.

The upcoming Test series against England will serve as a litmus test for Gambhir’s strategies. As the players take to the field, all eyes will be on Gill and Pant to see if they can translate their training into match-winning performances. The Indian cricket community is hopeful that the changes implemented by Gambhir will yield positive results and reinvigorate the team’s competitive edge.

In conclusion, Gautam Gambhir’s strategic overhaul of the Indian cricket team has set the stage for a promising future. With players like Shubman Gill and Rishabh Pant poised to shine, the team is ready to face the challenges ahead with renewed vigor and confidence, thanks to Gambhir’s expert guidance.

Source: Original article

Riyan Parag Linked to Sanju Samson Trade Controversy, Says Ex-CSK Star

August 12, 2025 Staff ReporterCricket, Election, Sports 0

Subramaniam Badrinath suggests that Riyan Parag may play a pivotal role in Sanju Samson’s potential departure from the Rajasthan Royals.

In a recent discussion, former Indian cricket team batter Subramaniam Badrinath expressed his views on the ongoing trade saga surrounding Sanju Samson and the Rajasthan Royals. Badrinath pointed out that Riyan Parag could be a significant factor influencing Samson’s future with the franchise.

As the cricketing world closely watches the developments in the Indian Premier League (IPL), the dynamics within the Rajasthan Royals have come under scrutiny. Sanju Samson, who has been a key player for the team, faces uncertainty regarding his position as the franchise evaluates its roster for the upcoming season.

Badrinath’s comments highlight the potential impact of younger players like Riyan Parag on established stars. Parag, known for his all-round abilities, has been making a name for himself in the league, and his emergence could lead to strategic changes within the team.

The Rajasthan Royals have been known for their willingness to experiment with their lineup, and the inclusion of Parag in the squad may signal a shift in focus towards nurturing young talent. This could inadvertently affect the standing of senior players like Samson, who has been a consistent performer for the team.

As teams prepare for the next season, the balance between experienced players and emerging talent becomes crucial. The Royals’ management will need to weigh the benefits of retaining a seasoned player like Samson against the potential of younger players like Parag to contribute to the team’s success.

With the IPL auction approaching, speculation around player trades and retention is intensifying. Fans and analysts alike are eager to see how the franchise will navigate these decisions, especially with a player of Samson’s caliber potentially on the move.

Badrinath’s insights serve as a reminder of the ever-evolving nature of team dynamics in professional cricket. As franchises look to build competitive squads, the interplay between established stars and promising newcomers will continue to shape the landscape of the league.

In conclusion, the future of Sanju Samson with the Rajasthan Royals remains uncertain, and Riyan Parag’s role in this narrative could be more significant than initially perceived. The coming weeks will be critical as the franchise makes decisions that could redefine its roster.

Source: Original article

Sanju Samson Discusses Surprising Encounter with Vaibhav Suryavanshi

August 12, 2025 Staff ReporterCricket, Election, Sports 0

Vaibhav Suryavanshi, who was acquired by the Rajasthan Royals for Rs 1.10 crore, made a notable impact during the season, scoring 252 runs in just seven innings.

Vaibhav Suryavanshi has made headlines after being picked by the Rajasthan Royals for Rs 1.10 crore during the recent mega auctions. His performance throughout the season has been impressive, culminating in a total of 252 runs across seven innings.

As a relatively new player in the league, Suryavanshi’s achievements have caught the attention of fans and analysts alike. His ability to contribute significantly to the team’s performance has positioned him as a player to watch in future matches.

The Rajasthan Royals have shown confidence in Suryavanshi’s potential, and his contributions on the field have validated their investment. With each game, he continues to develop his skills and adapt to the competitive environment of the Indian Premier League.

Fans are eager to see how Suryavanshi will build on this season’s success in the upcoming matches. His journey in the league is just beginning, and many are optimistic about his future prospects.

As the season progresses, Suryavanshi’s performance will be closely monitored, and he will undoubtedly be a key player for the Rajasthan Royals moving forward.

According to NDTV Sports, Suryavanshi’s impressive start has set the stage for what could be a promising career in cricket.

Source: Original article

Adani Power Plans $3 Billion Greenfield Thermal Plant in Bihar

August 12, 2025 Staff ReporterBusiness, Election, Government 0

Adani Power has announced plans to invest $3 billion in a new 2,400 MW greenfield thermal power plant in Bihar, following the receipt of a Letter of Intent.

Adani Power has officially received a Letter of Intent (LoI) to develop and operate a significant greenfield thermal power plant in Bihar. The project will have a capacity of 2,400 megawatts and represents an investment of $3 billion.

This development marks a substantial commitment by Adani Power to enhance the energy infrastructure in Bihar, a state that has been focusing on improving its power generation capabilities. The new thermal power plant is expected to contribute significantly to the region’s electricity supply.

With this investment, Adani Power aims to bolster its presence in the Indian energy sector, particularly in renewable and thermal power generation. The company has been actively involved in various energy projects across the country, and this new initiative aligns with its strategy to expand its operational footprint.

The establishment of the thermal power plant is anticipated to create numerous job opportunities during both the construction and operational phases. This is expected to have a positive impact on the local economy, providing employment and supporting ancillary industries.

As India continues to face challenges related to energy demand and supply, projects like this one are crucial for ensuring a stable and reliable power supply. The government has been encouraging private investments in the energy sector to meet the growing needs of the population and support economic growth.

Adani Power’s investment in Bihar is part of a broader trend of increasing private sector involvement in the energy market, which is vital for achieving the country’s energy goals. The new plant is expected to play a key role in meeting the energy requirements of the region while also contributing to the overall development of the state’s infrastructure.

As the project progresses, it will be closely monitored by both the company and regulatory authorities to ensure compliance with environmental and operational standards. The focus will be on sustainable practices to minimize the ecological impact of the new facility.

In summary, the establishment of the 2,400 MW greenfield thermal power plant by Adani Power in Bihar represents a significant investment in the region’s energy future, promising to enhance power generation capabilities and stimulate economic growth.

According to NDTV, this initiative underscores Adani Power’s commitment to expanding its energy portfolio and supporting India’s transition towards a more robust energy infrastructure.

Source: Original article

Bumrah Set to Play as Vice-Captaincy Change Looms in Asia Cup

August 12, 2025 Staff ReporterCricket, Election, Sports 0

Jasprit Bumrah is expected to play in the Asia Cup, while Shubman Gill and Axar Patel vie for the vice-captaincy in a squad selection that promises to be challenging for Indian selectors.

Jasprit Bumrah is set to participate in the upcoming Asia Cup T20 tournament, scheduled to take place in the UAE next month. However, there are indications that he may be rested for the opening Test against the West Indies in early October.

Shubman Gill has emerged as a standout player following his impressive performance in the recent Test series against England. He is now in contention for the vice-captaincy of the Indian squad, facing competition from Axar Patel. The Ajit Agarkar-led selection committee is expected to finalize the squad for the Asia Cup on August 19 or 20, contingent upon the medical updates from the Centre of Excellence’s Sports Science team regarding all players, including skipper Suryakumar Yadav, who has resumed batting practice in Bengaluru.

The selection process is anticipated to involve some challenging decisions. However, the Indian selectors are likely to prioritize maintaining continuity, a strategy that has yielded significant success since Suryakumar took over as T20 captain.

During India’s last series against England at home, Axar was appointed as the designated vice-captain. Conversely, Gill served as the deputy when Suryakumar was first named the full-time skipper of the T20 squad during the tour of Sri Lanka last year.

It is understood that the selection committee is hesitant to make significant changes to the current setup, as the top five players—Abhishek Sharma, Sanju Samson, Suryakumar, Tilak Varma, and Hardik Pandya—have formed a solid foundation for the team.

A BCCI source familiar with the developments remarked, “Abhishek Sharma is the world’s No. 1 T20 batter in the latest ICC rankings. Sanju Samson has been outstanding in the last season with both bat and gloves. It will certainly be a tough call, but Shubman in his current form, despite playing in Tests, cannot be overlooked. He also had a strong IPL season. The challenge for selectors is the abundance of performers at the top of the order.”

With numerous players excelling in the top order, finding a place for Yashasvi Jaiswal and Sai Sudharsan could prove difficult. Even KL Rahul, who is currently the first-choice wicketkeeper in ODIs, is unlikely to be considered for the middle-order batting position.

In terms of wicketkeeping, while Sanju Samson is almost certain to be the first-choice keeper, the competition for the second keeper’s slot will be between Jitesh Sharma and Dhruv Jurel. Jurel participated in the last T20 series, while Jitesh made a significant impact during the IPL with RCB, excelling in the role of a finisher.

As for the all-rounders, Hardik Pandya remains India’s preferred white-ball seam bowling all-rounder. However, Nitish Kumar Reddy, who sustained an injury during the England series, is unlikely to recover in time. Shivam Dube, who made a commendable return against England, is expected to secure a place in the squad.

Axar Patel and Washington Sundar are likely to be the other two spin-bowling all-rounders included in the squad.

The selection of the third seamer is another point of contention. With Bumrah and Arshdeep Singh having secured their spots, the competition for the third slot is between Prasidh Krishna, who took 25 wickets in the last IPL, and the formidable Harshit Rana, known for his ability to deliver heavy deliveries.

As the squad selection approaches, the likely contenders for the team include Suryakumar Yadav (captain), Shubman Gill, Abhishek Sharma, Sanju Samson (wicketkeeper), Tilak Verma, Shivam Dube, Axar Patel, Washington Sundar, Varun Chakravarthy, Kuldeep Yadav, Jasprit Bumrah, Arshdeep Singh, and either Harshit Rana or Prasidh Krishna, along with Jitesh Sharma or Dhruv Jurel.

Source: Original article

Ousted Karnataka Minister Alleges Conspiracy, Plans Meeting with Rahul Gandhi

August 12, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

KN Rajanna, Karnataka’s ousted minister, claims he is a victim of conspiracy following his dismissal over controversial remarks about voter theft.

KN Rajanna, a former Karnataka minister and close aide to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, has asserted that he has fallen victim to a “big conspiracy” after being dropped from the ministry due to his comments regarding voter theft. Rajanna announced plans to travel to Delhi to meet with senior party leaders, including Rahul Gandhi and KC Venugopal, to “clarify the misunderstanding” surrounding his remarks.

His dismissal comes amid rising tensions within the Congress party, particularly after Rajanna’s comments suggested that the party was in power when issues with the voter list arose. This has sparked a significant political controversy, with the BJP seizing upon his statements as ammunition against the Congress party.

Rajanna’s remarks indicated that the Congress should have addressed the alleged irregularities in the voter lists when they were first identified. “When was the voter list prepared? It was prepared when our own government was in power. At that time, were everyone just sitting quietly with eyes closed? These irregularities happened right in front of our eyes — we should feel ashamed. We didn’t take care of it at the time,” he stated, inadvertently providing the BJP with a strong critique of the Congress’s handling of the issue.

Following a day of heated discussions, including debates in the assembly, Rajanna was officially removed from his ministerial position. In a statement made later that evening, he expressed his intent to seek clarity on the situation, saying, “I won’t give any details now; you can use the word resignation, ouster, or let go, but behind all this, there is a big conspiracy and planning.” He further indicated that he would reveal more about the circumstances surrounding his dismissal at an appropriate time.

Rajanna’s comments have led to speculation about the internal dynamics of the Congress party. Sources suggest that while Chief Minister Siddaramaiah was initially reluctant to let Rajanna go, he ultimately complied after discussions with senior Congress leader KC Venugopal. Rajanna, along with several MLAs and ministers who support him, is reportedly considering their next steps and may seek further discussions with Siddaramaiah.

The situation remains precarious for Rajanna, as the Congress high command is closely monitoring developments. Another controversial statement from him could result in severe repercussions.

According to reports, the political fallout from Rajanna’s remarks has intensified the scrutiny on the Congress party’s internal affairs, particularly regarding its handling of voter-related issues. The party’s leadership is now faced with the challenge of addressing both the public perception and the internal dissent that has emerged from this incident.

Source: Original article

Rahul Gandhi Calls ‘Vote Chori’ an Attack on Democracy, Demands Digital Voter Rolls

August 12, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

Rahul Gandhi has called for the release of digital voter rolls, asserting that allegations of vote theft undermine the principle of ‘one man, one vote’ in the upcoming 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

New Delhi: Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, has once again criticized the Election Commission, asserting that allegations of vote theft represent an attack on the foundational principle of ‘one man, one vote.’ He has demanded the release of digital voter rolls to ensure transparency in the electoral process, particularly in light of claims of significant vote manipulation in the upcoming 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

On Sunday, Gandhi took to X (formerly Twitter) to voice his concerns, stating, “Vote Chori is an attack on the foundational idea of ‘one man, one vote.'” He emphasized the necessity of clean voter rolls for the integrity of free and fair elections, urging the Election Commission to be transparent and allow both the public and political parties to audit the voter rolls.

In his post, he reiterated, “A clean voter roll is imperative for free and fair elections. Our demand from the EC is clear—be transparent and release digital voter rolls so that people and parties can audit them.” He also provided a mobile number and website for supporters to join his campaign, encouraging citizens to visit votechori.in/ecdemand or give a missed call to 9650003420 to participate in the movement aimed at safeguarding democracy.

Gandhi’s comments come in the wake of serious allegations he made on August 7 regarding extensive vote theft during the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. He presented evidence to support his claims, detailing that approximately 100,250 votes were allegedly stolen in the Mahadevapura assembly constituency in Karnataka.

In his presentation, Gandhi outlined five distinct types of voter theft, which included 11,965 duplicate voters, 40,009 instances of fake and invalid addresses, 10,452 bulk voters registered at a single address, 4,133 invalid photographs, and 33,692 cases of misuse of Form 6.

These allegations have intensified the ongoing conflict between Gandhi and the Election Commission, as he continues to advocate for electoral reforms and greater transparency in the voting process. The call for digital voter rolls is part of a broader push to ensure that the electoral system remains fair and accountable.

As the 2024 elections approach, the debate over the integrity of the electoral process is expected to intensify, with political leaders and parties closely monitoring the actions of the Election Commission.

According to The Sunday Guardian, Gandhi’s campaign highlights the critical importance of maintaining public trust in the electoral system and the need for reforms to address potential vulnerabilities.

Source: Original article

Kashmir Prepares for Independence Day with Increased Security Measures

August 12, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Nation, USA 0

Kashmir is enhancing security measures with increased troop deployments and surveillance ahead of Independence Day to ensure safe and peaceful celebrations across the region.

Srinagar: As Independence Day approaches, security has been significantly heightened across all districts of Kashmir. Authorities have implemented comprehensive arrangements to ensure the peaceful and smooth conduct of celebrations throughout the region.

Major highways, including the Jammu-Srinagar National Highway, are under high alert. Additional deployments of security forces, including the Border Security Force (BSF), Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), and Jammu & Kashmir Police, have been made along key routes. New bunkers have also been established at strategic locations to bolster vigilance and ensure public safety.

In the northern border districts of Baramulla, Kupwara, and Bandipora, there has been a notable increase in troop presence, both in the hinterlands and the plains. Intelligence reports indicate a heightened threat level in areas along the Line of Control (LoC) due to ongoing infiltration attempts by terrorists from across the border. In response, the Indian Army and BSF are employing advanced surveillance technologies to counter any potential threats.

Across Kashmir, patriotic fervor is on the rise as Tiranga rallies are being organized in the lead-up to August 15. Various organizations and local bodies are actively participating in the celebrations, highlighting a collective spirit of unity among the populace.

Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Baramulla, Gurinder Pal Singh, addressed the media regarding the district’s preparedness. He announced that Independence Day celebrations will occur at 147 venues, including remote areas and locations near the LoC.

SSP Singh assured the public that foolproof security arrangements have been established, with intensified surveillance and force deployment aimed at preventing any untoward incidents. “All necessary protocols are in place to ensure the safety of citizens and dignitaries during the celebrations,” he stated.

The administration has called on the public to cooperate with security forces and participate in the national celebrations with unity, enthusiasm, and respect for the nation.

Source: Original article

Shah Rukh Khan Wins First National Award After 33 Years

August 2, 2025August 4, 2025 Staff ReporterCover, Election, Film 0

Shah Rukh Khan has been awarded his first National Film Award for Best Actor, marking a long-awaited milestone in his distinguished career.

After an illustrious career spanning over 33 years, Bollywood icon Shah Rukh Khan has received his first National Film Award for his role in Jawan. The recognition is seen as a significant milestone for the actor, who is affectionately known as the “King of Bollywood.” This award comes on the heels of a storied journey marked by numerous acclaimed and commercially successful films.

The 71st National Film Awards, announced today, honored Shah Rukh with the Best Actor award for his powerful performance in Jawan. Despite his long list of achievements across both critically lauded and blockbuster movies, this marks his first National Award. Many in the industry and among his fanbase view this achievement as long overdue.

Shah Rukh Khan began his film career in 1992 with Deewana and swiftly ascended to become one of India’s most celebrated and bankable actors. Over the years, he has starred in films such as Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge, Swades, Chak De! India, and My Name Is Khan, each earning critical acclaim.

Despite being a fan favorite, Shah Rukh often found the prestigious National Film Award just out of his reach. In 2004, his performance as Mohan Bhargava, a NASA engineer reconnecting with his roots in Swades, was highly praised but overshadowed by Saif Ali Khan’s win for Hum Tum.

His role in Chak De! India as Kabir Khan, a hockey coach on a redemption path, led to the film winning a National Award, yet Shah Rukh himself was once again passed over for Best Actor, a title which went to Hrithik Roshan for Dhoom 2 in 2007.

In 2010, Shah Rukh delivered a powerful performance in My Name Is Khan, portraying Rizwan Khan, a man with Asperger’s Syndrome navigating a complex global backdrop. While it won international accolades, Amitabh Bachchan took the National Award for Best Actor that year for his role in Paa.

Finally receiving this recognition after years of near misses, Shah Rukh Khan’s fans and critics alike believe the award confirms his status not only as a beloved superstar but also as one of the finest actors working in Indian cinema today.

Beyond this recent accolade, Shah Rukh Khan’s contributions to cinema have been recognized with numerous prestigious honors. He is a recipient of the Padma Shri, one of India’s highest civilian awards, and has been awarded two of France’s distinguished titles, the Ordre des Arts et des Lettres and the Legion of Honour.

His journey to receiving a National Award underscores a career marked by persistence, outstanding performances, and a profound impact on audiences worldwide, cementing his legacy in the annals of Indian film history.

According to Hindustan Times.

Source: Original article

Trump Proposes Revoking Birthright Citizenship in New Plan

July 31, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Politics 0

The Supreme Court recently allowed the federal government to develop plans to revoke birthright citizenship for children of certain immigrants, potentially leading to significant changes in U.S. citizenship policy.

In a move that raises fundamental questions about constitutional rights in the United States, the Supreme Court has enabled the Trump administration to begin formulating plans to end birthright citizenship for some children of immigrants. This policy shift targets approximately 150,000 babies born each year who have traditionally been granted automatic citizenship under the 14th Amendment since 1868.

Following the Supreme Court’s decision in June, an immigration agency unveiled the initial phase of its strategy to enforce this dramatic alteration in citizenship policy. This proposal includes the possibility of revoking citizenship from the children of immigrants without permanent legal status, as well as those whose parents are lawful residents, including visa holders, Dreamers, and asylum-seekers.

The plan suggests that there will be a federal review process of parents’ legal status, possibly taking place in hospitals shortly after childbirth. This approach could profoundly affect the lives of children born in the U.S., who might face deportation to countries they have never visited, leaving them in a state of statelessness.

This development follows a series of federal court decisions that initially blocked the administration’s efforts to change birthright citizenship. The courts previously deemed the executive order as unconstitutional. However, the Supreme Court’s recent ruling has shifted the legal landscape, allowing the government to pursue these plans further.

The implications of this policy are far-reaching, influencing the lives of many children born on American soil and challenging longstanding interpretations of the 14th Amendment. The proposed changes have sparked widespread debate over the nature of citizenship and constitutional rights in the United States.

The details of the implementation plan, released in a bureaucratic memo, have drawn significant attention due to their potential impact on the nation’s immigration and citizenship framework. The memo’s language suggests a deliberate intention to impose these changes, despite the complex legal and human rights issues involved.

According to Slate, this policy could lead many individuals, raised and living their entire lives in the U.S., to face removal to countries with which they have no connection, or to a future in legal uncertainty.

Source: Original article

DOJ to Prioritize Revoking Citizenship Cases

July 31, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Immigration 0

The Justice Department has intensified its focus on denaturalization, aiming to strip U.S. citizenship from naturalized citizens involved in certain criminal activities, according to a recent memo directing attorneys to prioritize such cases.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is placing a strong emphasis on denaturalization efforts, targeting naturalized Americans who have committed certain crimes, as per a June 11 memo. The initiative grants U.S. attorneys broader discretion in pursuing these cases and is aimed at individuals who were not born in the United States. According to 2023 data, there are nearly 25 million immigrants who hold naturalized citizenship.

One recent example of this policy in action is the case of Elliott Duke, a military veteran originally from the United Kingdom. Duke, who uses they/them pronouns, has had their citizenship revoked after being convicted of distributing child sexual abuse material, an activity they admitted to engaging in before becoming a U.S. citizen.

Denaturalization, a tactic that saw significant use during the McCarthy era and more recently under former Presidents Obama and Trump, is employed to remove citizenship from individuals who may have lied about criminal backgrounds or affiliations with illegal organizations on their applications. The current directive from Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate indicates that such proceedings will be a top priority for the DOJ’s Civil Division.

“The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence,” Shumate noted in the memo.

This focus on denaturalization marks the latest step by the Trump administration to transform the U.S. immigration system fundamentally. Other actions have included attempts to end birthright citizenship and reduce refugee admissions.

Legal experts have voiced significant constitutional concerns regarding the potential implications for the families of naturalized citizens. According to Cassandra Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, civil litigation for denaturalization raises issues of due process violations, as those involved are not entitled to government-provided legal representation, and the burden of proof is lower than in criminal cases.

Critics argue that this could lead to a “second class of U.S. citizens,” with those naturalized at greater risk of losing their citizenship. Sameera Hafiz from the Immigrant Legal Resource Center expressed shock at the administration’s expansion plans for denaturalization.

However, Hans von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation supports the measures, stating that the privilege of U.S. citizenship should be revoked from those who engage in serious criminal behavior.

The DOJ memo outlines expanded criteria for denaturalization, including national security violations and fraud crimes like those involving the Paycheck Protection Program or Medicare. Additionally, U.S. attorneys have been granted “wide discretion” in pursuing other cases deemed important by the Civil Division, leading to concerns about the government’s broad authority in these matters.

Steve Lubet, professor emeritus at Northwestern University, highlighted the vagueness of these categories and their potential overreach. He also raised concerns about the ripple effects on families, particularly children whose citizenship derives from a parent facing denaturalization.

The case of Elliott Duke illustrates the potential consequences for those caught in denaturalization proceedings. Duke, who was convicted of offenses before completing the naturalization process, is now effectively stateless and unable to challenge the legal decision without difficulty.

The push toward denaturalization parallels actions taken during the McCarthy era, characterized by intense scrutiny and removal of citizenship from thousands, until a 1967 Supreme Court ruling curtailed such practices. Recent technological advances under the Obama administration facilitated the identification of potential denaturalization cases, leading to an uptick in these actions during Trump’s first term.

Despite concerns about expanding the criteria for denaturalization, experts like Robertson question the scope of cases that actually warrant such action. She suggests that intensified enforcement might target individuals with minimal infractions, aligning with broader trends in immigration enforcement under the current administration.

Source: Original article

Kamala Harris Rules Out California Governor Run

July 31, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, U.S. 0

Former U.S. presidential candidate Kamala Harris has announced she will not run for governor of California, fueling speculation about her future political ambitions.

After an unsuccessful 2024 presidential campaign, Kamala Harris has dispelled rumors of her entering the California governor’s race. Harris, who previously served as a U.S. senator for California and worked as a prosecutor, made her announcement on social media, stating she would not seek the office in the upcoming election cycle.

“After deep reflection,” the former vice-president wrote in a statement, “I’ve decided that I will not run for Governor in this election.” She added that her role in public service will not include elected office “for now,” and promised to share more about her plans in the coming months.

This decision by Harris leaves open the possibility of another run for the White House in 2028, while removing a significant contender from the race to replace Governor Gavin Newsom. Newsom, a fellow Democrat and presumed to have his own presidential aspirations, cannot run for governor again as he is finishing his second and final term.

Harris’s announcement also seems to touch upon internal Democratic Party concerns about the party’s future direction after her loss to President Donald Trump in the recent presidential election. “As we look ahead, we must be willing to pursue change through new methods and fresh thinking—committed to our same values and principles, but not bound by the same playbook,” she stated.

The California gubernatorial primaries are scheduled for June 2026, with the general election set for November of the same year. The new governor will assume office in 2027. Given the Democratic dominance in California’s political landscape, whoever secures the party nomination is widely expected to win the governorship. The state has not had a Republican governor since Arnold Schwarzenegger left office in 2011.

California ranks as an economic powerhouse, often identified as the world’s fifth-largest economy. As the home of Silicon Valley, where major technology firms like Apple and Meta are headquartered, its governor wields substantial national influence through the state’s policies and regulations.

This latest move by Harris adds intrigue to California’s political scene and offers hints at her continued prominence in the national political arena, according to BBC News.

Source: Original article

Redistricting May Impact Future US House Elections

July 27, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics 0

Texas Republicans are considering breaking with traditional redistricting timelines to gain additional congressional seats ahead of the midterm elections, potentially influencing similar moves in other states.

The Texas Legislature is facing a pivotal decision as President Trump has called for the creation of new congressional districts that could enhance Republican representation in time for the upcoming midterm elections. Texas currently holds 38 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, with Republicans occupying 25 and Democrats 12, while one seat remains vacant following the death of a Democrat.

The redistricting process, traditionally following the decennial U.S. Census or a court ruling, is at the heart of this politically strategic move. Doug Spencer, Rothgerber Jr. Chair in Constitutional Law at the University of Colorado, noted increased efforts by political actors to challenge traditional boundaries and reconfigure political landscapes.

The potential trial of new mid-decade redistricting rules in Texas has prompted other states to watch closely, assessing whether to adopt similar strategies. The rules guiding redistricting remain variable, with each state possessing its own laws and regulations. Political leaders are keenly gauging public and legal tolerance for such initiatives.

The regular decennial redistricting cycle leverages population data from the U.S. Census Bureau to allocate the 435 House seats among the states, a process called reapportionment. States establish their district lines based on how their population has changed relative to others. Some states employ independent commissions to delineate political boundaries, whereas others leave the task to legislative bodies, which sometimes results in judicial challenges under the Voting Rights Act if the maps are deemed unfair.

Though often contentious, there are no federal restrictions against drawing new districts mid-decade to bolster the ruling party’s congressional clout. “The laws about redistricting just say you have to redistrict after every census,” Spencer pointed out, noting that some state legislatures have interpreted this as an opportunity for additional redistricting outside the usual timeline.

Among the states considering such moves, California Governor Gavin Newsom has expressed readiness to counteract Republican initiatives in Texas by enhancing Democratic representation, although constitutional requirements for independent commissions might complicate such efforts.

Texas is no stranger to redistricting complexities, having faced similar situations in the past. After the 2000 census, a federal court stepped in to draw the congressional map when the state legislature failed to agree. That move, driven by then U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, eventually led to Republicans gaining five additional seats.

The legality of politically motivated redistricting, often labeled gerrymandering, was brought to light in a landmark 2019 Supreme Court decision. It ruled that federal courts should refrain from adjudicating partisan gerrymandering disputes, though it left room for litigation on the basis of racial discrimination under the Voting Rights Act.

The prospect of Texas setting a precedent for mid-cycle redistricting has reverberated across the nation. Democratic Representative Suzan DelBene has signaled that Democratic-led states might reassess their maps if Texas proceeds. New York and other Democratic strongholds could face similar decisions, though they must contend with their own legislative constraints against gerrymandering.

On the Republican front, states like Ohio and Florida, led by Gov. Ron DeSantis, are weighing early redistricting options to optimize their political leverage before future elections. Ohio is mandated by law to redraw its maps by the mid-2026 election cycle, providing a natural opportunity to reconsider its district lines.

As the redistricting narrative unfolds, all eyes remain on Texas and its legislative decisions, which could herald a ripple effect across the political landscape in the United States.

Source: Original article

UN Staff Union Declares No Confidence in Secretary-General

July 25, 2025 Staff ReporterCover, Election, Politics 0

The UN Staff Union in Geneva has unanimously declared a vote of no confidence in the Secretary-General and the UN80 restructuring plan, citing concerns over transparency, job cuts, and organizational direction.

The United Nations is facing a growing internal backlash against its ambitious UN80 restructuring initiative. Staff unions are rallying against the plan, which has now sparked a vote of no confidence targeting UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and Under-Secretary-General Guy Ryder, the leader of the restructuring process.

On July 24, an Extraordinary General Assembly meeting held by the Staff Union Council in Geneva culminated in the adoption of a critical motion. Attended by nearly 600 staff members—well above the quorum of 200—the meeting’s participants unanimously expressed grave concerns over the UN80 plan, voicing distrust in the leadership charged with its roll-out.

UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq responded cautiously, reaffirming the organization’s commitment to engaging with staff representatives. “We remain committed, as we have been from the beginning of the UN80 Initiative, to consultation with staff representatives and engagement with them through the procedures in place for this purpose,” Haq stated. He further urged a collective approach to mitigate negative impacts and navigate the challenging reforms ahead for a more effective United Nations.

A memo from Laura Johnson, Executive Secretary, and Ian Richards, President of the Staff Union in Geneva, presented multiple reasons for the disenchantment. One major point of contention is the lack of vision and evaluation in the UN80 initiative, which critics claim has been hastily conducted. Staff unions also criticize budget proposals for 2026, which suggest cutting 20 percent of posts without evidence of crisis resolution, while contrasting this with other organizations maintaining zero-growth budgets.

The union’s memo also denounces the reinforcement of a top-heavy UN structure. Most job cuts are expected at junior levels, with no reductions at the Under-Secretaries-General level. Additionally, allegations have surfaced that Secretary-General Guterres has extended some USG contracts beyond his mandate, promoting personnel selectively while limiting others to a year to avoid indemnities during separations.

Additional apprehension stems from the decentralization proposal, which could increase long-term costs, and the indictment of staff for organizational failures, which may partially result from the UN’s dwindling visibility in peace and security matters.

The UNOG Staff Union intends to deliver the motion and its underlying concerns to the Secretary-General and subsequently to UN Member States. Staff members are also encouraged to voice their grievances through a survey conducted by the Coordination Committee for International Staff Unions and Associations (CCISUA), active until July 27, as well as direct correspondence with union representatives.

Simultaneously, the UN80 Initiative is progressing under the oversight of Guy Ryder, with a Task Force exploring three primary areas: enhancing efficiencies and improvements, mandate reviews mandated by Member States, and a strategic review of deeper, structural organizational changes. Secretary-General Guterres underscores the initiative’s broader implications, stressing that UN budgets impact lives across the globe.

The initiative’s core objectives focus on improved efficiency and effectiveness by streamlining operations and reducing costs while better aligning the UN’s operations with its mandates. Ongoing structural reforms may consolidate departments and agencies, aiming for a strategic realignment of the UN’s programs to current necessities and priorities.

The discontent among staff highlights the challenges of implementing organizational change in a complex, globally-distributed workforce, as internal opposition and the drive for reform continue to shape the trajectory of the UN80 initiative.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Stance Changes on Prosecuting Former Presidents

July 25, 2025 Staff ReporterCover, Election, Governance 0

As President Donald Trump and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard seek to pacify their base over the Jeffrey Epstein files, they propose the idea of charging former President Barack Obama with treason for allegedly undermining Trump’s first presidency.

The suggestion by Trump and Gabbard involves allegations that Obama orchestrated false intelligence regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election to weaken Trump before assuming office. Despite the audacious claim, the primary challenge is the lack of evidence against Obama or other officials. Furthermore, even substantial evidence might clash with legal immunity afforded to former presidents.

Gabbard’s narrative suggests Obama engineered intelligence about Russian interference during the 2016 election to damage Trump. However, such claims are based on dubious interpretations and misleading information. Moreover, significant intelligence findings have been repeatedly validated, even by Republicans like Trump’s Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a crucial 2020 Senate report.

Besides evidentiary challenges, there’s the issue of whether Obama would be immune from prosecution—a situation paradoxically shaped by Trump himself. In 2024, Trump championed the notion that presidents should have extensive immunity from criminal charges, a stance upheld by the Supreme Court, potentially shielding Obama from any prosecution attempt.

Despite suggestions from Trump and Gabbard that Obama could face charges, Trump’s own legal team had previously argued against such actions, emphasizing the vital need for presidential immunity. Trump’s former personal lawyer, D. John Sauer, told the Supreme Court that without immunity from criminal prosecution, the presidency would be incapacitated.

Sauer went as far as positing that a president could make extreme decisions, like ordering the assassination of political opponents, without facing charges since such actions would fall under official presidential duties.

While the Supreme Court didn’t endorse this extreme interpretation, it did reinforce presidential immunity. This raises the question of whether such immunity would apply to Obama.

The Court concluded actions taken under a president’s core executive powers are immune. Furthermore, presidents possess presumed immunity for acts within their official responsibilities, which are not patently beyond their authority. However, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. established a high threshold for instances in which immunity wouldn’t apply.

The ruling’s implications are still debated, especially concerning Trump’s alleged actions related to the January 6 Capitol riot. Although these cases never reached trial after Trump’s election, prosecutors and judges continue to reassess valid evidence and charges.

Harvard law professor Richard Lazarus noted, “Assuming this nonsense is true, if Obama were acting in his official capacity in merely communicating with his intelligence folks about Russian interference, clear immunity.” But if Obama’s actions were personal, aiming to support Clinton’s campaign, immunity might not be so apparent.

Comparatively, it would be simpler for Obama to argue that the actions in question encompassed official duties, unlike Trump’s attempts to contest election results, which fall outside a president’s established role, typically managed by states.

In the eyes of Trump’s and Gabbard’s accusations, Obama was involved in creating intelligence reports. However, seeking intelligence falls under a president’s core responsibilities. Even if not, such actions remain within the “outer perimeter” of official duties, where overcoming immunity is challenging.

UCLA law professor Rick Hasen noted “Communicating with intelligence officials would seem to fall into the scope of official duties.” Yet, theoretical charges would face a major hurdle due to the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States, precluding the use of official acts as criminal evidence.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, during a press briefing, repeatedly deferred on whether immunity applied to Obama. “I’ll leave that to the Department of Justice,” she remarked.

Overall, while the situation appears academic, it remains highly speculative that Trump and his Justice Department would pursue prosecuting Obama. Historically, Trump’s claims often dissipate. However, media coverage, more focused on Obama allegations than the Epstein files, indicates a potential temporary diversion strategy.

This juxtaposition is striking. Trump’s legal position argued for comprehensive presidential immunity as essential for executive functions. Yet, he suggests abandoning those standards for his predecessor’s more official-seeming actions.

According to Trump’s legal rationale, Obama could arguably have taken far more drastic actions than adjusting intelligence reports, potentially without consequence.

Source: Original article

Trump Signs Order Easing Homeless Removal Policies

July 25, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Nation, Politics 0

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order aimed at facilitating the removal of homeless individuals from public areas, redirecting federal resources to relocate them to rehabilitation and substance misuse facilities.

President Donald Trump took a significant step in addressing homelessness by signing an executive order that empowers local authorities to more easily remove homeless individuals from public spaces. The order, signed on Thursday, directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to overturn legal precedents and nullify consent decrees that restrict local governments’ ability to relocate homeless persons.

The executive order also mandates the redirection of federal resources to transport affected individuals to rehabilitation and substance misuse facilities. Additionally, it instructs Bondi to collaborate with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner, and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy. The aim is to expedite federal funding to states and municipalities that actively tackle “open illicit drug use, urban camping and loitering, and urban squatting,” while also monitoring sex offenders’ locations.

On Friday, President Trump described the order as a reasonable solution to the country’s homelessness crisis. “Right outside, there were some tents, and they’re getting rid of them right now,” Trump said to a reporter on the White House South Lawn. “We can’t have it—when leaders come to see me to make a trade deal for billions and billions and even trillions of dollars, and they come in and there’s tents outside of the White House. It doesn’t sound nice.”

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that the executive order was a demonstration of Trump’s commitment to “end homelessness across America.” She added that by removing “vagrant criminals” from the streets and reallocating resources towards substance abuse programs, the Trump Administration aims to foster safer communities and assist individuals struggling with addiction or mental health issues.

However, the order has faced significant criticism from advocates for the homeless community. Donald Whitehead, executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless, argued that the order will worsen homelessness. “These executive orders ignore decades of evidence-based housing and support services in practice,” said Whitehead in a press release. “They represent a punitive approach that has consistently failed to resolve homelessness and instead exacerbates the challenges faced by vulnerable individuals.”

The National Homelessness Law Center also condemned the order, stating that it “deprives people of their basic rights and makes it harder to solve homelessness.” According to the center, the directive will increase police presence and institutionalization in response to homelessness, further expanding the number of people living in tents, cars, and on the streets.

The executive order follows a Supreme Court decision last month in favor of an Oregon city, allowing it to ticket homeless individuals for sleeping outside. The ruling dismissed arguments that such “anti-camping” ordinances violate the Constitution’s ban on “cruel and unusual” punishment. The case had been closely monitored by city and state officials grappling with a surge in homelessness and the emergence of encampments under bridges and in urban parks nationwide.

Homelessness in the United States reached record levels last year, largely due to insufficient affordable housing, an influx of migrants seeking refuge, and natural disasters that displaced many people from their homes, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. In 2024, over 770,000 people experienced homelessness, marking an 18% increase from 2023. This was the largest annual rise since HUD began gathering data in 2007, excluding the change from 2021 to 2022, when a full count was not conducted due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

During his campaign for president, Trump frequently highlighted the homelessness crisis, describing it as a destructive force on American cities. In a September campaign rally in North Carolina, he vowed that “the homeless encampments will be gone” and emphasized the need to address the issue.

Source: Original article

Poll Shows Growing Disapproval of Trump Among Independents

July 25, 2025 Staff ReporterEditorial/Opinion, Election, Politics 0

President Donald Trump’s approval rating among independent voters has dropped sharply in a recent Gallup poll, raising concerns for Republican leaders ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

President Donald Trump faces declining approval ratings among independent voters, according to a new Gallup survey. The dip in support is primarily attributed to dissatisfaction with his handling of key issues such as the federal budget, the economy, and immigration.

The July Gallup poll reveals that Trump’s job approval rating has fallen to 37 percent among all American adults, marking the lowest point of his second term. Among self-identified independents, his approval rating stands at 29 percent, reflecting a 17-point decline from January, equaling his lowest rating with this group since taking office.

Notably, 64 percent of independents expressed an unfavorable view of Trump’s job performance. In contrast, the sentiment among party lines shows stark differences—only 7 percent of Republicans shared this unfavorable view, whereas 97 percent of Democrats reported unfavorable opinions.

The survey was conducted shortly after the passing of Trump’s megabill by Congress, with 73 percent of independents disapproving of his management of the federal budget. Similarly, 65 percent of all adults surveyed disapproved of his budgetary handling, an increase from the 52 percent recorded in March of this year.

This decline in independent support signals potential challenges for Republican leaders as they strive to hold onto their narrow control of the House and Senate in the upcoming 2026 midterms. Trump has consistently struggled to achieve more than 40 percent approval from independents on crucial issues central to his 2024 campaign strategy.

Despite emphasizing economic fortification, 68 percent of independents disapprove of Trump’s handling of the economy. Overall disapproval among adults rose to 61 percent, continuing a trend from previous months: 54 percent in February and 59 percent in March.

Immigration remains a polarizing issue despite being a central part of Trump’s agenda, which he frames as vital to national security and economic stability. The poll indicates that only 30 percent of independents approve of Trump’s immigration policies. Disapproval among all adults reached 60 percent, up from 51 percent in February.

Democrats overwhelmingly disapprove of Trump’s management across major issues. Approval from Democrats is notably low, with only 2 percent approving his economic policies and 3 percent supporting his budget management. Just 4 percent approve of his immigration strategies.

Conversely, Trump continues to receive strong backing from Republicans, with 89 percent approving of his presidency. Specifically, 84 percent support his handling of the economy, 81 percent endorse his management of the federal budget, and 88 percent approve of his immigration policies.

The Gallup poll surveyed 1,002 adults via telephone from July 7-21, 2025, with a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. The margin of error is larger for subgroups.

According to Politico.

Source: Original article

US Withdraws from UNESCO Again Under Trump’s Leadership

July 22, 2025 Staff ReporterCover, Election, Politics 0

President Donald Trump has announced the United States will withdraw from UNESCO, the U.N. cultural and education agency, repeating a decision he made during his first term.

President Donald Trump has announced that the United States will exit the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) at the end of 2025, marking the second time he has taken such a step. The decision echoes his actions during his first term, which were later reversed by former President Joe Biden.

The White House explained the departure as part of the Trump administration’s “America first” foreign policy, expressing skepticism toward multilateral organizations such as the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, and NATO. White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly criticized UNESCO for supporting “woke” and “divisive” cultural causes that clash with what she termed “commonsense policies” favored by American voters.

The State Department further accused UNESCO of promoting a “globalist, ideological agenda” that is inconsistent with the Trump administration’s foreign policy. A significant point of contention was UNESCO’s 2011 decision to admit the Palestinians as a member state, which the U.S. deemed problematic and contributing to anti-Israel sentiment.

UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay expressed regret over the U.S. decision but noted the organization was prepared for the possibility. She emphasized that UNESCO had diversified its funding sources, with the U.S. providing only about 8% of its budget.

French President Emmanuel Macron reaffirmed strong support for UNESCO, calling it a “universal protector” of world heritage, while condemning the U.S. decision as a blow to multilateralism.

UNESCO officials indicated that the U.S. withdrawal is expected to have a limited impact on U.S.-funded programs. However, Israel welcomed Washington’s move, with U.N. ambassador Danny Danon criticizing UNESCO for perceived biases against Israel. Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar thanked the U.S. for its “moral support and leadership” in addressing what he described as the politicization and singling out of Israel within U.N. agencies.

Conversely, U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a senior Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, labeled Trump’s decision as “short-sighted” and warned it could bolster China’s influence, which grew within UNESCO after Trump’s initial withdrawal.

Azoulay asserted that the issues cited by the U.S. for its withdrawal were outdated and failed to recognize UNESCO’s efforts in promoting Holocaust education and countering antisemitism. She described the organization as a rare forum for multilateralism focused on consensus and action.

UNESCO, established after World War II to foster peace through international cooperation in education, science, and culture, is renowned for designating World Heritage Sites. In the U.S., designated sites include the Grand Canyon and the Statue of Liberty, among others. The agency highlights 1,248 global locations of “outstanding universal value.”

The U.S. has had a complex history with UNESCO, having first withdrawn in 1984 under President Ronald Reagan amid accusations of financial mismanagement and anti-U.S. bias. The U.S. rejoined in 2003 under President George W. Bush, though funding was halted in 2011 following UNESCO’s vote to grant full membership to the Palestinians. Trump’s first term saw another withdrawal in 2017 over accusations of anti-Israeli bias, a decision reversed by Biden in 2023.

Source: Original article

Democrats’ Poll Standing at Trump’s Six-Month Mark

July 20, 2025 Staff ReporterCover, Election, Politics 0

Recent polls provide a complex picture for Democrats as they face challenges in regaining voter trust following a significant loss to President Trump in the last election.

Despite recent notable election victories, Democrats have struggled to distance themselves from the Republican Party as they look toward the upcoming midterms. Data experts suggest that while the party’s position has somewhat improved since Trump began his second term, much work remains to convince the American public and regain control of the House.

“You can’t just be on the attack. You can’t beat something with nothing,” said Democratic pollster Celinda Lake. “We have to show and tell what we would do, but I think that we’re on the precipice of a big opportunity, and I hope we take advantage of it.”

After losing ground when Trump swept all seven battleground states and the GOP gained control of Congress, Democrats are focusing on rebuilding. However, data on the party’s standing remains less than encouraging halfway through Trump’s first year back in office.

The Democratic Party continues to experience historically low favorability ratings. According to a YouGov average, the party’s favorability was over 20 points underwater as of late May. A CNN poll released recently found only 28% of surveyed Americans view the party favorably, a low not seen since CNN began the poll in 1992. While the Republican Party’s ratings aren’t much better, they haven’t reached the same depths.

A poll conducted by the Democratic super PAC Unite the Country revealed that voters perceive the party as “out of touch,” “woke,” and “weak.” An AP-NORC poll found a divide among party members, with just a third of Democrats optimistic about the party’s future, down from 57% last July.

Survey results highlight widespread frustration with Democratic leaders and a belief that they are not effectively countering the Trump administration. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is a particular focus, with mid-to-upper 20s approval ratings during Trump’s second term, though his net favorability has recently improved slightly.

Scott Tranter, director of data science for Decision Desk HQ (DDHQ), noted that Democrats are struggling to form a coherent message and lack a clear “rallying cry.” Some Democrats have drawn attention, either through confrontations with Trump officials or visits to detention centers like “Alligator Alcatraz” in Florida, but Schumer is still seen as lacking the gravitas of a strong party leader.

One ongoing trend is the absence of a defined Democratic Party leader following the 2024 election defeat. A March CNN poll found that 30% of Democrats couldn’t name a leader reflecting the party’s core values, with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) receiving the most support at only 10%. Former Vice President Kamala Harris was supported by 9%, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) by 8%.

An Emerson College poll shows a wide split among Democrats about preferred 2028 presidential contenders, with the leading candidate only garnering 16% support. Tranter indicated that such disarray is typical after a major election loss, comparing the situation to the post-loss transformations of Democrats in 2005 and Republicans in 2013.

“Coming out of Kerry, the Democrats were also in the wilderness,” he said. “And so I think that the takeaway is that every time something like this happens, each party goes through its transformation. I think we’re still pretty early on [in] it.”

Yet, there’s a silver lining for the Democrats in the data. Trump’s approval and favorability ratings remain underwater, which provides Democrats a potential opening. Democrats also hold a small lead in DDHQ’s generic congressional ballot average as of early March, a margin that continues to hover at a few points.

The same CNN poll that highlighted the Democrats’ low favorability also showed party members are more motivated to vote in the next year’s midterms. A Republican pollster Fabrizio Ward’s survey found Republicans trailing in the generic ballot across 28 battleground House districts. Moreover, Democrats are hopeful that opposing Trump’s recent “big beautiful bill” may provide the needed boost for their base before the midterms.

Ryan O’Donnell, interim executive director at Data for Progress, noted Trump’s focus on unpopular policies potentially benefits Democrats going into the midterms. However, he warned that Democrats also must listen to voter concerns and propose real solutions to improve quality of life and affordability.

Lake emphasized the lack of a clear leader could become an asset, with a crowded field in 2028 showcasing what the Democratic alternative to Trump could look like. However, finding and establishing a few strong leaders has been slow, and she doubts this will be “fixed” before the 2026 midterms. She encourages the party to present a unified voice with a strong economic message addressing who they will fight for.

Finally, a partnered poll between Lake’s firm and the Democratic donor network Way to Win surveyed those who voted for President Biden in 2020 but abstained in 2024. The findings showed these voters leaned Democratic if the midterms were held today and felt discontent about Medicaid cuts and stagnant living costs.

Jenifer Fernandez Ancona, the co-founder and vice president of Way to Win, stated that these concerns offer the party a clear opening. With respondents expressing regret over not voting, particularly regarding child aid program cuts and escalating living costs, Ancona urged the party to leverage this data to build an opposition narrative.

“The table has been set,” Fernandez Ancona said. “The question is, will we be able to take advantage of it? Will we really lean in? Will we not shy away from actually going on offense about this bill? It’s all about, can we seize the opportunity?”

Mohanlal Steps Down; Boban, Vijayaraghavan Lead 2025 AMMA Election

July 19, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Film, Leadership 0

The Association of Malayalam Movie Artists (AMMA) is set to undergo a significant leadership transition as superstar Mohanlal steps down as president, with Kunchacko Boban and Vijayaraghavan emerging as frontrunners for the position.

The AMMA, which represents actors in the Malayalam film industry, is preparing for a pivotal leadership change with current president Mohanlal announcing he will not seek re-election. This decision has ignited excitement and speculation within the industry as new candidates emerge. The upcoming elections are scheduled for August 15, 2025, with preparations already underway.

Nominations for the election, which began on July 17, will decide 17 key positions, including six officer roles and eleven executive committee seats. The opening of the nomination window has generated significant interest, with at least five members collecting nomination forms on the first day and over 30 members expected to compete for various posts.

With Mohanlal stepping aside, the focus has turned to two prominent actors: Kunchacko Boban, representing the younger generation of actors, and veteran Vijayaraghavan, who has considerable support from senior artists. Sources close to AMMA suggest that should Vijayaraghavan officially declare his candidacy, he may secure an uncontested victory, given the respect he commands among peers.

The post of general secretary has also attracted interest, with actor Baburaj preparing to file his nomination. Rumors suggest that actress Shwetha Menon, a former AMMA officeholder and seen as a formidable female candidate, may also join the race, although her participation remains unconfirmed. Many are keenly observing whether she will officially enter the contest.

Several well-known figures, including former executive members such as Tovino Thomas, Tini Tom, Vinu Mohan, Kalabhavan Shajohn, Jayan Cherthala, and Suresh Krishna, are expected to contest in the elections. Their involvement indicates active engagement from both senior and younger actors in shaping AMMA’s future leadership.

Candidates wishing to contest in the election have until July 24 to submit their nominations. As voting day approaches, the coming weeks are anticipated to reveal more contenders. This election is expected to herald a new era for AMMA, bringing fresh direction and energy, as all eyes focus on who will succeed Mohanlal as president.

In his final acting endeavor before stepping down, Mohanlal was featured in the crime thriller ‘Thudarum,’ directed by Tharun Moorthy. He portrayed Shanmugham “Benz,” a challenging role met with acclaim for its compelling narrative and strong performances, including Mohanlal’s own.

Source: Original article

Democratic Senators Question Trump’s New Citizenship Data System

July 17, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, World 0

Three Democratic U.S. senators have expressed concerns over a citizenship data system developed under the Trump administration, warning it could disenfranchise eligible voters.

Three Democratic U.S. senators are calling attention to a searchable citizenship data system developed during the Trump administration, raising concerns that its use could lead to the wrongful disenfranchisement of eligible voters.

The tool, detailed first by NPR, is enabled by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and is used to verify the citizenship status of individuals listed on state voter rolls when provided with a Social Security number, name, and date of birth.

Developed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the system connects federal immigration databases with Social Security Administration data. This integration allows state and county election officials to verify the citizenship status of not only foreign-born naturalized citizens but native U.S. citizens for the first time.

The rapid advancement and linking of government data sets under the Trump administration have raised questions about potential governmental use of shared voter roll data. Legal and privacy experts, speaking with NPR recently, expressed alarm over the new data system, which upgrades the existing USCIS platform known as the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE). They criticized its quick rollout without the transparency or public notices typically required by federal privacy laws.

Senators Alex Padilla of California, Gary Peters of Michigan, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon underscored these points in a letter addressed to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. They emphasized the need for public transparency and assurances that citizens’ rights, including privacy, are adequately protected.

“Unfortunately, DHS has not issued any of the routine and required documentation about the program’s operations and safeguards or any public notice or notice to Congress,” the senators wrote.

They also questioned the tool’s accuracy and potential for mistakenly flagging eligible citizens as ineligible to vote.

In the build-up to the 2024 election, former President Trump and his allies disseminated unsubstantiated claims that Democrats allowed migrants to enter the country to illegally vote and manipulate election outcomes. However, this narrative lacks evidence, with state audits indicating that noncitizen voting instances are rare and often occur due to noncitizens erroneously believing that they are permitted to vote in federal elections.

Despite the lack of evidence for widespread noncitizen voting, Republicans at different government levels have continued to advocate for additional verification processes to prevent such occurrences.

In a March 25 executive order on voting, Trump instructed DHS to offer states “access to appropriate systems” at no cost for verifying voter citizenship and directed the attorney general to prioritize prosecuting noncitizens who register or vote.

USCIS spokesperson Matthew Tragesser described the SAVE system upgrades as a “game changer” for eliminating benefit and voter fraud among the alien population.

DHS did not immediately respond to requests for comments on the senators’ letter.

The department has divulged little information about the tool publicly, although a DHS staff member privately presented it to the Election Integrity Network, a group aligned with Trump known for promoting misleading election fraud narratives. This presentation drew the senators’ attention.

The senators voiced their grave concern over DHS sharing information with the Election Integrity Network—an organization founded by Cleta Mitchell, a lawyer who sought to overturn the 2020 election results—while keeping lawmakers and the public in the dark.

Their letter urged USCIS to brief the Senate committees on Rules and Administration, and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, providing all materials shared with the Election Integrity Network.

Additionally, the senators requested Secretary Noem address several questions, such as whether public notice was provided before launching the data system, how the tool’s accuracy was tested, how personal data is safeguarded, and if the federal agency will retain voter roll data.

Source: Original article

Times Square Ad Targets Mamdani for Ramawamy Campaign

July 15, 2025 Staff ReporterConflict, Election, Politics 0

A Times Square billboard has stirred controversy by urging New Yorkers to flee Zohran Mamdani’s “socialist tyranny” for the conservative policies of Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy.

A new advertisement in New York City’s Times Square is sparking political debate, urging residents to consider escaping what it describes as Zohran Mamdani’s “socialist tyranny” and relocating to Ohio. The billboard, which debuted on July 14, has attracted attention for its bold messaging in one of the city’s most prominent tourist locations.

The controversial ad was funded by “Vivek Super PAC — Victors, not Victims,” a group backing Vivek Ramaswamy’s campaign for governor of Ohio. Ramaswamy, a biotech entrepreneur and political newcomer, is being positioned as a conservative alternative to Mamdani, a 33-year-old Democratic Socialist who recently won the Democratic primary for mayor of New York City.

According to the New York Post, the $50,000 billboard campaign paints Mamdani as a “radical socialist” and presents a stark choice between Ramaswamy’s conservative vision and Mamdani’s progressive policies. Both Indian-origin politicians are emerging as influential figures in their respective party lines.

Vivek Ramaswamy gained recognition during the 2024 presidential primaries and made history by achieving the largest first-quarter fundraising total for any gubernatorial candidate in Ohio, raising $9.7 million without including any personal contributions.

Meanwhile, Zohran Mamdani, currently a state assemblymember, has built his mayoral campaign on grassroots support, focusing on tenant advocacy and proposing systemic reforms in policing and housing. His campaign has garnered endorsements from several prominent Democratic politicians, including Senator Bernie Sanders and Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, as he aims to become the first Muslim and South Asian mayor of New York City.

Source: Original article

India Condemns Attack on Toronto Rath Yatra Procession

July 15, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, USA 0

India has strongly condemned the egg attack on the Rath Yatra procession in Toronto and urged Canada to uphold religious safety and accountability.

India has called upon Canadian authorities to ensure accountability and safeguard the religious freedom of all communities following an attack on the 53rd annual Rath Yatra in Toronto on July 11.

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson, Randhir Jaiswal, described the incident as “despicable” and “regrettable,” asserting that it detracts from the festival’s core values of unity, inclusivity, and social harmony. “We have strongly taken up the matter with Canadian authorities to hold the perpetrators of the act accountable. We hope the Canadian Government will take necessary action to protect the religious rights of people,” Jaiswal stated.

The incident unfolded in downtown Toronto, where thousands of devotees had congregated to participate in the Rath Yatra, a religious procession organized by the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON). Despite the attack, consisting of unknown individuals reportedly throwing eggs at the procession, the event continued amid shock and astonishment among the gathered participants.

The act has sparked significant response from both political and community leaders in India. Former Odisha Chief Minister and Biju Janata Dal (BJD) president, Naveen Patnaik, expressed his deep concern regarding the incident, urging the Ministry of External Affairs to formally protest. “Such incidents not only grievously hurt the sentiments of Lord Jagannatha’s devotees worldwide but also cause deep anguish to the people of Odisha, for whom this festival holds profound emotional and cultural significance,” Patnaik asserted.

He further emphasized the need for the Odisha Government to treat the matter seriously and consult with the Ministry of External Affairs to ensure a strong protest is lodged with Canadian authorities, should the media reports prove accurate.

In addition to calls for action, the event highlights ongoing concerns over religious freedoms and safety for minority communities abroad. The Rath Yatra, revered as an essential cultural and spiritual event by the Hindu community, emphasizes communal inclusivity, a principle believed to be threatened by the attack.

According to New India Abroad, the Canadian government has been approached to address and rectify the situation, ensuring the respect and protection of religious rights internationally.

Source: Original article

Democrats Prepare for 2028 Presidential Race in Key States

July 15, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, U.S. 0

The race for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination is heating up unusually early, with multiple prospects already engaging with key primary states like South Carolina, New Hampshire, and Iowa.

With the first presidential primary votes still over two and a half years away, Democratic hopefuls are actively positioning themselves for a possible 2028 nomination. Over a span of ten days in July, at least three potential Democratic candidates are scheduled to visit South Carolina, underscoring the increasing importance of the Palmetto State in presidential politics.

California Governor Gavin Newsom made headlines during his recent two-day tour in South Carolina when he was referred to as a presidential candidate — despite his assertion that his visit was aimed at strengthening the Democratic Party ahead of the 2026 midterms. Audience members responded to his speech with shouts of “2028!”

Meanwhile, Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, who has openly acknowledged consideration of a 2028 presidential bid, is set to focus his South Carolina visit this week on engaging union members and celebrating the state’s Black community. His remarks are expected to implicitly contrast with Newsom on cultural issues.

California Congressman Ro Khanna, known for his alignment with the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, will also target Black voters during his upcoming visit to South Carolina, alongside the son of a civil rights leader.

The excitement in South Carolina is mirrored by increased activity in other early-primary states. Former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel is reportedly having private discussions with influential South Carolinians, including Rep. Jim Clyburn, about a potential presidential run.

Such early maneuvers are fueled by the Democratic Party’s push to redefine its strategy following its loss of the White House and Congress in 2024. Republicans, unable to benefit from incumbency since former President Donald Trump is constitutionally barred from a third term, provide Democrats with an opportunity for a fresh start in the 2028 elections.

Analysts foresee as many as 30 prominent Democrats potentially entering the 2028 primary, a number reminiscent of the overcrowded 2020 field. Democratic figures like Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas emphasize the necessity of visibility and a new wave of leadership.

Beshear’s visit to South Carolina will mark the start of his political engagements in the state. He plans to address union workers and reach out to Black voters in areas that have staunchly supported Trump in the past. His speech is expected to highlight the necessity of claiming the political center and rebuilding trust in the Democratic brand.

Beyond their planned speeches, Newsom and Beshear represent two disparate approaches within the Democratic Party, each striving to influence policy direction and voter allegiance. Newsom has previously critiqued the party for overemphasizing “woke” agendas, while Beshear’s governance in Kentucky includes policies like recognizing Juneteenth as a state holiday and promoting diversity through executive orders.

Khanna, who is scheduled to hold town-hall meetings in South Carolina, frames his comparatively lower profile as a virtue in the crowded Democratic field. He noted the absence of a “status quo person” as beneficial for the party, describing this as a time for openness and innovation.

While some potential candidates like Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer are negotiating political priorities and avoiding early-state travel for now, others, such as Maryland Governor Wes Moore and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, have already started engaging with South Carolina Democrats. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who ran in 2020, hosted a town hall in Iowa earlier this year.

Even as contenders like these seek to make their mark, others like Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar are focused on forthcoming elections, with Klobuchar notably campaigning in New Hampshire to support local Democratic candidates.

Voters in New Hampshire and South Carolina are eager for the campaign season to begin, some seeing it as an opportunity to rejuvenate local Democratic efforts. According to Jane Lescynski, a worker at a New Hampshire facility, the early activity indicates a promising lead-up to the next presidential election.

Jody Gaulin, chair of a predominantly Republican South Carolina county, expressed hope that such visits could invigorate the local Democratic scene. With early speculation building excitement, states like South Carolina and New Hampshire are poised to play crucial roles in shaping the future of the Democratic Party.

Source: Original article

Andrew Cuomo Announces NYC Mayoral Run Against Zohran Mamdani

July 15, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Nation USA, Politics 0

Former Governor Andrew Cuomo announced he plans to run for New York City mayor as a third-party candidate, setting up a competitive showdown against Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani and other contenders.

Andrew Cuomo, who previously served as New York’s governor, declared his intention to continue his pursuit of the New York City mayoral position as a third-party candidate. His announcement follows a defeat to Zohran Mamdani in the recent Democratic primary, setting the stage for a competitive general election later this year.

“I’m in it to win it,” Cuomo emphasized in a social media post, underscoring his commitment to the campaign.

Cuomo, who resigned from his gubernatorial position in 2021 amid multiple sexual harassment accusations, was long seen as a prominent figure in the Democratic primary due to his extensive political experience and connections within the party’s establishment.

Mamdani, a 33-year-old state assemblyman, had significant late-campaign momentum, promoting a progressive agenda focused on leading the city in a new direction, which resonated with voters.

In his recent statement, Cuomo criticized Mamdani, describing his campaign as one offering “slick slogans but no real solutions.”

“We need a city with lower rent, safer streets, where buying your first home is once again possible, where childcare won’t bankrupt you,” Cuomo stated, echoing the themes central to Mamdani’s campaign. “That’s the New York City we know, that’s the one that’s still possible. You haven’t given up on it, and you deserve a mayor with the experience and ideas to make it happen again — and the guts to take on anyone who stands in the way.”

Cuomo acknowledged feedback from supporters regarding his lack of visibility during the primary, committing to a more hands-on approach in the upcoming months.

“Every day I’m going to be hitting the streets, meeting you where you are, to hear the good and the bad, problems and solutions, because for the next few months it’s my responsibility to earn your vote. So let’s do this,” he asserted.

While Cuomo and his supporters had previously highlighted his experience opposing former President Donald Trump, this reference was less prominent in his most recent comments, which prioritized daily challenges like affordability, an issue central to Mamdani’s campaign success.

Mamdani quickly responded to Cuomo’s announcement with a critique aimed at both Cuomo and incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who is also running on a third-party ticket for the upcoming election.

“While Andrew Cuomo and Eric Adams trip over each other to win the approval of billionaires in backrooms, our campaign remains focused on working New Yorkers and their clear desire for a different kind of politics,” Mamdani wrote.

Prior to Cuomo’s formal announcement, footage surfaced showing him filming campaign material on New York streets, prompting Mamdani to accuse him on social media of mimicking the Democratic nominee’s successful video-driven campaign strategy.

Though Cuomo has yet to detail his third-party run mechanics for November, he is expected to leverage the “Fight and Deliver” party line he established earlier this year, which provides an avenue for independent candidacy.

During the primary night concession speech, Cuomo acknowledged his opponent’s effective outreach and campaign strategy.

“Tonight was not our night. Tonight was Assemblyman Mamdani’s night, and he put together a great campaign, and he touched young people and inspired them and moved them and got them to come out and vote, and he really ran a highly impactful campaign. I called him. I congratulated him,” he said. “He deserved it, he won.”

Besides Mamdani and Adams, Cuomo will face independent candidate Jim Walden, a former prosecutor, and Curtis Sliwa, a well-known radio host and Republican nominee.

Cuomo’s critics have implied that his continued candidacy might offer constituents an alternative to Mamdani’s policies, which some view as excessively liberal despite the city’s strong Democratic leaning. Former Democratic Governor David Paterson has urged opponents to unite behind the candidate best positioned to challenge Mamdani in the general election.

Cuomo echoed Paterson’s sentiment in a letter to his supporters, stating, “All of us who love New York City must be united in running the strongest possible candidate against Zohran Mamdani in the November general election for mayor.”

Source: Original article

Cuomo Announces New York City Mayor Election Bid

July 15, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics 0

Andrew Cuomo has announced a long-shot independent bid for New York City mayor following his decisive loss to Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic primary.

After losing by 12 points to Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic mayoral primary, former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo declared his intention to run as an independent candidate in the general election. Cuomo made the announcement through a social media post featuring images of him engaging with New Yorkers on the street, seemingly echoing Mamdani’s popular campaign videos. The 67-year-old framed the race primarily as a contest between himself and Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist, omitting mention of incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, Republican Curtis Sliwa, and independent Jim Walden.

“The general election is in November and I am in it to win it,” Cuomo stated, criticizing Mamdani’s campaign for offering “slick slogans, but no real solutions.”

Cuomo’s independent run marks an attempt to reposition himself after his primary loss, when he was criticized for running a low-energy campaign and failing to engage voters directly. In contrast, Mamdani emphasized voter interaction, including a walk the length of Manhattan the night before the primary, which contributed to his success.

In the campaign video, Cuomo thanked supporters and apologized, emphasizing key issues such as affordability, which had been central to Mamdani’s campaign strategy. “We need a city with lower rents, safer streets, where buying your first home is once again possible, where child care won’t bankrupt you,” Cuomo said. He pledged to meet voters on the streets, suggesting a hands-on approach to campaigning this time around.

The video differed starkly from his formal 17-minute primary announcement in March, signaling a reset for Cuomo. Now, wearing more casual attire and in a shorter video, he presented his vision for New York City.

Cuomo faces the challenge of appealing to voters and donors without the institutional backing he had during the primary. His former campaign was criticized for not focusing adequately on voter turnout, a misstep he now aims to correct with a new campaign team and strategy.

Zohran Mamdani remained confident in his campaign following the primary win, stating, “I welcome everyone to this race, and I am as confident as I’ve been since three weeks ago on primary night.” He highlighted his focus on issues affecting working New Yorkers, contrasting himself with Cuomo and Adams.

Eric Adams, who did not participate in the Democratic primary due to his controversial ties with former President Donald Trump, and whose campaign focuses on blue-collar voters of color and Jewish New Yorkers, has criticized Cuomo’s continued presence in the race. Adams released a statement denouncing Cuomo’s attempt to regain footing, accusing him of undermining a Black elected official’s position.

The upcoming general election poses a significant challenge for Cuomo, as New York City is a predominantly Democratic city. Recent polls show Cuomo as a strong second to Mamdani, potentially benefiting from the vote split between Mamdani, Adams, and others. Nevertheless, key labor unions and critical supporters from the primary have yet to endorse his independent run.

While Cuomo has advocated for a united front against Mamdani, suggesting that the strongest candidate should lead the charge, it seems unlikely that his opponents will withdraw in his favor. Meanwhile, Adams has been meeting with donors who previously supported Cuomo, further complicating the dynamics of the upcoming election.

According to Politico, Cuomo’s previous supporters have acknowledged the difficulty of both men staying in the race, which could ultimately favor Mamdani.

Source: Original article

Tharoor Leads Kerala Poll; Shailaja Among LDF Leaders

July 9, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics 0

Shashi Tharoor has emerged as the most preferred candidate for the Chief Ministerial post in Kerala according to a pre-poll survey, despite existing tensions with the Congress high command.

Senior Congress leader and Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor has received significant backing from a recent pre-poll survey conducted by Mumbai-based VoteVibe, which places him as the leading candidate for the position of Kerala’s Chief Minister. The survey’s results, shared by Tharoor on his social media account, showed a strong preference for him among voters.

Tharoor wasted no time in sharing the survey findings on his social media platform, formerly known as Twitter, on Wednesday. The post, attributed to a supporter, was also tagged to key Congress figures, including Rahul Gandhi, K.C. Venugopal, Priyanka Gandhi, and the Leader of Opposition V.D. Satheesan. The message praised Tharoor as the best candidate for the chief ministerial position in the 2026 Kerala polls, particularly for the faction-ridden United Democratic Front (UDF) alliance.

Despite Tharoor’s strong showing in the survey, top Congress leaders in Kerala have thus far remained silent on the development. Sunny Joseph, the newly appointed president of the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC), attempted to temper the excitement, emphasizing that leadership decisions within the Congress are made only after election results and follow a set process.

Tharoor’s relationship with the Congress central leadership has been tense following his decision to contest the party’s presidential election against Mallikarjun Kharge. This strain was further highlighted when Tharoor’s name was initially omitted from the list of Congress leaders involved in the Union government’s Operation Sindoor outreach program. However, in a significant gesture, Prime Minister Narendra Modi later invited Tharoor to lead a delegation to the United States and other countries.

Upon his return, Tharoor acknowledged existing differences with the party leadership but expressed willingness to engage in dialogue if approached. A seasoned politician and a four-time Member of Parliament representing Thiruvananthapuram since 2009, Tharoor topped the VoteVibe pre-poll survey with 28.3% support among state’s voters. The survey also highlighted a leadership vacuum within the opposition UDF, with 27.1% of voters undecided on the alliance’s leadership.

Supreme Court Supports Trump’s Plan to Reshape Federal Government

July 9, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Governance, Politics 0

The Supreme Court has endorsed President Donald Trump’s agenda to execute extensive layoffs and restructurings within federal agencies, countermanding a prior restriction established by a lower court.

The Supreme Court’s latest ruling grants President Donald Trump permission to carry out significant staff reductions and organizational changes in several federal agencies, overriding a lower court’s decision that required congressional approval for such actions. This development signifies another judicial victory for Trump, reinforcing his administration’s policies, including those concerning deportation and executive orders.

Issued through an unsigned order, the Supreme Court nullified lower court injunctions that blocked the administration’s general restructuring efforts rather than assessing individual agency plans for workforce reduction. Although the precise vote count was not disclosed, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, part of the court’s liberal contingent, voiced her dissent.

The case originated from an executive order signed by Trump in mid-February, initiating a sweeping downsizing of federal agencies, a commitment he made during his presidential campaign. In response, departments announced their intentions to lay off tens of thousands of employees.

Historically, lower courts have ruled that while the president can propose modifications, the executive branch cannot unilaterally dissolve federal departments or slash their personnel to the extent that they are unable to fulfill their mandated responsibilities.

“Considering the strong likelihood that the government’s argument—that the executive order and its associated memorandum are lawful—will prevail, we grant the application,” the Supreme Court’s brief noted. “We do not opine on the legality of agency-specific reduction-in-force and reorganization strategies crafted or sanctioned under the executive order and memorandum.”

The ruling left open the potential for future judicial scrutiny if it appears any reorganization plans might incapacitate an agency from meeting its legal duties.

The lawsuit challenging the executive order was initiated by a coalition of unions, nonprofit organizations, and local governments. This group labeled the litigation as the most extensive legal objection to the Trump administration’s workforce downsizing objectives.

In a statement, the coalition expressed grave concern: “Today’s decision represents a grave setback to our democratic values and threatens critical services that American citizens depend on, placing them in significant jeopardy. Reorganizing government functions and conducting mass layoffs without congressional consent remains unconstitutional.”

The coalition vowed to keep fighting the legal battle to “ensure essential public services that protect the American public remain intact.”

Reacting to the Supreme Court’s verdict, the White House heralded it as “a clear victory for the President and his administration,” denouncing judicial interventions perceived as impediments to achieving enhanced governmental efficiency. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields remarked, “This decision rebuffs attempts by leftist judges seeking to prevent the President from exercising his constitutionally granted executive powers.”

Justice Jackson criticized the court’s decision in her dissent, calling it “hubristic and senseless” and contending that lower courts are more adept at assessing the impact of such governmental changes.

“The case is fundamentally about whether the administration’s plans effectively usurp Congressional policymaking authority, which seems difficult to evaluate meaningfully after such changes occur,” Jackson wrote. “Yet surprisingly, this court has decided to intercede now, facilitating the President’s agenda prematurely.”

The ruling impacts planned workforce reductions across more than a dozen federal agencies, encompassing the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, Labor, Treasury, State, Health and Human Services, Veterans Affairs, and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Particularly notable proposed cuts include reducing positions by around 10,000 at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, and the National Institutes of Health, as found in court records. Moreover, the Treasury Department’s plan involves decreasing Internal Revenue Service personnel by 40%. Initially, the Department of Veterans Affairs intended to cut 80,000 jobs, though that number has been adjusted down to 30,000 through specified workforce management strategies.

Some agency leaders indicated they had paused their reorganization efforts due to the lower court’s injunction. For instance, Andrew Nixon, a spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services, expressed intent to proceed with department transformation efforts aimed at improving public health.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, also of the court’s liberal faction, shared some agreement with the decision, acknowledging its limitations and ensuring existing legal constraints remain intact. Sotomayor noted that the executive order in question directs agencies to execute changes “consistent with applicable law.”

A previous ruling from a federal judge in California had halted comprehensive layoffs, and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals opted not to intervene, prompting the Trump administration to bring the case to the Supreme Court.

Judge Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court had earlier commented, “While presidents are entitled to set priorities for the executive branch and have them executed by agency heads, a president cannot initiate significant executive branch reorganization without Congressional partnership.”

The appeals court, with Judge William Fletcher writing the majority opinion, reiterated that historically, such types of organizational reforms have been subject to Congressional consent.

House Approves Tax and Spending Bill, Benefiting Johnson and Trump

July 4, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, News, Politics 0

House Republicans passed President Trump’s sweeping legislation on Thursday, marking a significant legislative victory as it now awaits the president’s signature.

In a vote that concluded with a narrow margin of 218-214, two Republican lawmakers joined all Democrats in opposing the bill, which has been touted by President Trump as his “big, beautiful bill.” The legislation now heads to Trump’s desk, where he is expected to sign it on July 4, meeting his self-imposed deadline for enacting the package.

The road to passage was not without its hurdles. The GOP leadership kept procedural votes open for several hours in an attempt to persuade undecided members to support the measure. President Trump played an active role in rallying support, while House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) delivered an extensive speech lasting 8 hours and 44 minutes in opposition to the legislation.

Despite these challenges, the passage of the bill represents a major triumph for both President Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), solidifying their legislative agenda amidst a closely divided Congress.

The vote saw Republican Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania break ranks with their party, ultimately voting against the bill.

Alongside his political endeavors, President Trump is scheduled to accompany First Lady Melania Trump in a meeting with former Israeli hostage Edan Alexander later on Thursday. Following this engagement, President Trump will travel to Iowa to deliver a speech at the state fairgrounds, signaling the commencement of the nation’s 250th-year celebrations.

The developments come as Trump maintains a significant presence on the political stage, with his legislative priorities playing a central role in shaping the current political landscape.

According to The Hill, the legislative journey of this bill has involved significant strategic maneuvering and political involvement from the highest levels of government.

Source: Original article

Senate Approves Trump Agenda Bill After Extended Voting Session

July 1, 2025July 8, 2025 Staff ReporterElection, Politics, Security 0

The Senate has narrowly passed President Donald Trump’s domestic agenda bill, which now moves to the House of Representatives for further approval.

The Senate passed President Donald Trump’s ambitious legislative package on a knife-edge vote of 50-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the decisive vote. This megabill represents a core component of Trump’s domestic agenda and has set the stage for a significant legislative battle as it heads to the House of Representatives.

Republican leaders in the Senate managed to secure enough votes after intense negotiations with key holdouts in their ranks. However, the next hurdle appears imminent, with GOP leaders in the House now facing a high-stakes effort to ensure the bill reaches the president’s desk by July 4.

While visiting a makeshift detention facility called “Alligator Alcatraz” in Florida, President Trump confidently predicted the bill’s successful passage in the House. He also downplayed concerns related to potential impacts on American health care coverage, which have been a point of contention among critics of the bill.

This extensive bill outlines significant tax reductions and boosts in funding for national security, all of which will be offset by the most considerable cuts to the federal safety net seen in decades. As Washington gears up for another legislative showdown, the focus now turns to the House as lawmakers evaluate the sweeping changes proposed within this multi-trillion-dollar plan.

According to CNN, the bill’s advancement symbolizes a pivotal moment in Trump’s tenure, potentially reshaping the nation’s fiscal landscape if fully enacted.

Source: Original article

Phase Four of 2024 Lok Sabha Elections: Key Battles and Controversies Unfold Across States

May 14, 2024 Staff ReporterPolitics, Election 0

The fourth phase of the 2024 Lok Sabha election commenced today with voting underway for 96 seats across 10 states and union territories, alongside balloting for all 175 seats of the Andhra Pradesh Assembly and 28 of 147 in Odisha. As stated by the original article, “The Lok Sabha seats in play today are all 25 in Andhra Pradesh and 17 in Telangana, in addition to 13 in Uttar Pradesh, 11 in Maharashtra, eight each in Bengal and Madhya Pradesh, five in Bihar, four in Odisha and Jharkhand, and Jammu and Kashmir’s Srinagar.” With today’s voting, the Lok Sabha election 2024 marks its halfway point, having concluded polling for 381 of the Lower House’s 543 seats.

The electoral landscape features prominent figures, including Akhilesh Yadav of the Samajwadi Party vying from Kannauj and Mahua Moitra from the Trinamool Congress defending her Krishnanagar seat. Omar Abdullah, leader of the National Conference, stands from Srinagar, continuing the legacy of his father, Farooq Abdullah. The Congress’ Bengal chief, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, contests from Bahrampur against Trinamool’s Yusuf Pathan, a former Indian cricketer. Meanwhile, Dilip Ghosh of the BJP faces Kirti Azad, another ex-cricketer, in Bardhaman-Durgapur, reflecting the intense political dynamics in Bengal, where rivalries unfold amid the overarching narrative of the INDIA opposition bloc.

In Telangana, Asaduddin Owaisi of AIMIM faces BJP’s Madhavi Latha for the Hyderabad seat, continuing a long-standing political legacy. And in Andhra Pradesh, YS Sharmila, sister of Chief Minister Jagan Reddy, leads the Congress’ campaign from Kadapa, challenging her cousin, sitting MP YS Avinash Reddy. The BJP’s Giriraj Singh contests against Awadesh Kumar Rai in Begusarai, while Ajay Mishra Teni, also of the BJP, runs from UP’s Lakhimpur Kheri, a constituency that gained prominence during the 2021 farmers’ protest due to Teni’s son’s involvement in a controversial case.

In the 2019 elections, the BJP secured only 42 of the 96 seats up for grabs today, encountering challenges particularly in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. The lead-up to this phase has been marked by controversies, with the Election Commission drawing attention for various issues, including notices to Mallikarjun Kharge and JP Nadda of the Congress and BJP respectively, following Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s comments on Muslims and wealth redistribution. The Election Commission also sent a notice to Kharge after his criticism of the commission’s credibility. Additionally, contentious remarks by Congress leader Sam Pitroda regarding inheritance taxes and racial diversity, along with the release of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on bail, have contributed to the election narrative.

The voting process for the Lok Sabha elections of 2024 commenced today, encompassing 96 seats across various states and union territories, alongside elections for the Andhra Pradesh Assembly and a portion of seats in Odisha. This phase marks a significant milestone, with half of the Lok Sabha seats having completed the polling process. Notable contenders include Akhilesh Yadav from the Samajwadi Party, Mahua Moitra from the Trinamool Congress, and Omar Abdullah from the National Conference, each contesting from their respective strongholds. The electoral battleground in Bengal features intense rivalries, with key players from different political parties, including the Congress, BJP, and Trinamool, engaging in high-stakes contests. Telangana witnesses a high-profile clash between Asaduddin Owaisi of AIMIM and Madhavi Latha of the BJP for the Hyderabad seat. Meanwhile, in Andhra Pradesh, familial ties intertwine with political ambitions as YS Sharmila of the Congress challenges her cousin, sitting MP YS Avinash Reddy, in Kadapa. The BJP faces its own challenges, with Giriraj Singh contesting in Begusarai and Ajay Mishra Teni in Lakhimpur Kheri, amidst controversies surrounding the latter’s son. The BJP’s performance in the 2019 elections sets the backdrop for this phase, with the party striving to improve its standing in states like Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. Leading up to this phase, the Election Commission has been under scrutiny for various issues, including notices to key political figures and controversies surrounding remarks made by leaders from different parties.

TheUNN Corporation

CONTACT US

Follow us

Subscribe to Newsletter