Trump Targets Foreign Student Enrollment as Ivy League Schools See Soaring International Numbers

June 8, 2025June 9, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Three decades ago, only 11% of Harvard University’s student body came from abroad. Today, that figure has risen dramatically to 26%, marking a significant shift in the composition of elite academic institutions in the U.S. This trend is not unique to Harvard—many prestigious universities across the United States have increasingly relied on their global appeal to attract high-achieving students from around the world. However, the surge in international enrollment has recently come under fire, with President Donald Trump using his authority over immigration policy to challenge the status quo of American higher education.

Trump has initiated a direct move against Harvard University by invoking a broad federal law to prevent foreign students from entering the country to attend the school’s Cambridge, Massachusetts campus. Although this proclamation is currently limited to Harvard and was temporarily blocked by a federal judge late Thursday, it sets a precedent that may affect other institutions, especially those the Trump administration sees as bastions of liberalism requiring reform.

Colin Binkley, who has reported on Harvard for nearly ten years and lives just half a mile from its campus, noted the growing tension on university grounds facing federal scrutiny. Columbia University, where international students comprise 40% of the student population, is among the schools feeling the heat. As the Trump administration intensified reviews of new student visas last week, concerns began to mount within the Columbia academic community. A group of faculty and alumni, known as the Stand Columbia Society, voiced alarm over what they described as Trump’s arbitrary power over the academic landscape.

“Columbia’s exposure to this ‘stroke of pen’ risk is uniquely high,” the group stated in a newsletter, highlighting how vulnerable the institution is to executive decisions.

International students make up a disproportionate share of the student body at Ivy League institutions compared to the national average. While just 6% of all U.S. college students in 2023 were from other countries, international students accounted for 27% across the Ivy League. Columbia had the highest share at 40%, followed closely by Harvard and Cornell at about 25% each. Brown University had the lowest proportion, still substantial, at 20%.

Beyond the Ivy League, the trend of growing international enrollment extends to other elite private universities. For instance, both New York University and Northeastern University saw their foreign student populations double between 2013 and 2023. In contrast, public universities experienced more restrained growth in international admissions. Even among the 50 most selective public universities, only about 11% of students came from outside the U.S.

This pattern reflects global economic shifts. As middle-class families in countries like India and China have grown in affluence, more are able to invest in test preparation and application coaching to help their children secure spots in prestigious U.S. universities. Rajika Bhandari, head of a higher education consulting firm, noted the powerful allure of Ivy League schools overseas.

“The Ivy League brand is very strong overseas, especially in countries like India and China, where families are extremely brand-aware of top institutions in the U.S. and other competing countries,” Bhandari explained in an email.

Bhandari emphasized that over the past two decades, American universities have increasingly embraced the value of international exchange. This global perspective has not only enhanced cultural diversity but has also served as a crucial revenue stream, particularly for funding expensive programs in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). With many U.S. students deterred by rising tuition costs and student loan burdens, international students have helped keep enrollment numbers up and financial balance sheets stable.

The dramatic rise in foreign enrollment took off around 2008, driven largely by a surge in students from China. William Brustein, who helped lead international efforts at universities like Ohio State and West Virginia, described the phenomenon as a “gold rush” in higher education. As global competition intensified, universities raced to position themselves as the most globally connected institutions.

“Whether you were private or you were public, you had to be out in front in terms of being able to claim you were the most global university,” Brustein said.

Economic incentives also played a major role. Many international students are not eligible for federal financial aid and often pay significantly higher tuition than domestic students. This created a strong financial motivation for colleges to increase their international enrollment. According to Brustein, some elite institutions, such as Harvard, do offer financial aid to foreign students. However, many of those who are admitted can already afford to pay premium rates, which frees up more scholarship funds for American students.

Despite the growth, not all universities have expanded international enrollment at the same rate. Public institutions often face pressure from state lawmakers to prioritize local students, limiting the number of foreign students they can admit. In contrast, private universities do not face such restrictions and have aggressively pursued international applicants, especially as domestic college-going rates have remained stagnant.

Advocates of international education point to the significant benefits that foreign students bring, both to universities and the broader U.S. economy. These students contribute billions of dollars annually and frequently go on to work in high-demand fields like technology and engineering. Most international students choose to study STEM subjects, making them vital to U.S. innovation and competitiveness.

In the Ivy League, much of the international enrollment growth has occurred at the graduate level, although undergraduate numbers have also seen steady increases. At Harvard, more than half of all graduate students are from other countries, further underscoring the university’s dependence on global talent.

While elite universities benefit from global student flows, the reliance on international enrollment has exposed them to new vulnerabilities, particularly under politically motivated scrutiny. Trump’s recent actions, beginning with Harvard, signal a shift in the role of immigration policy in shaping the makeup of American higher education institutions.

The potential for abrupt policy changes is causing deep concern among administrators, faculty, and students alike. With the increasing politicization of higher education and immigration, universities may find themselves caught in the crossfire of ideological battles, jeopardizing both their financial stability and their reputation as global academic leaders.

Trump Administration Targets Harvard Over International Students Amid Broader Crackdown

June 8, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

President Donald Trump has issued a proclamation this week that suspends visas for new international students who were planning to attend Harvard University this fall. However, this directive was promptly halted by a judge, at least temporarily.

This development represents a significant intensification of the ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and Harvard, the oldest and one of the most prestigious universities in the United States.

The White House defends its actions as necessary due to “national security, crime and civil rights concerns.” In addition to suspending new student visas, the proclamation also directs Secretary of State Marco Rubio to examine the visas already issued to other foreign nationals at Harvard. The goal is to determine whether those students “meet the criteria” specified in the president’s order.

Although Harvard has become the latest focal point, this move is part of a broader and increasingly aggressive immigration policy shift that has particularly affected international students throughout the United States.

Just days earlier, the Trump administration had announced a new travel ban and a series of restrictions targeting citizens from 19 countries, set to take effect on June 9. Furthermore, the U.S. State Department last month declared that it would stop scheduling new visa interviews for international students.

The resulting uncertainty and anxiety among international students who had hoped to study at American universities this fall is growing. Early indicators from educational application platforms suggest that the number of international students searching for universities in the U.S. has already dropped sharply.

This decline in interest is alarming for many American institutions, especially those that depend heavily on international student tuition and benefit from their cultural, academic, and research contributions. Experts warn that a sustained decrease in international enrollment could lead to serious long-term consequences.

“Universities understand the value of those students and their contributions culturally, socially, strength of research, all of those things,” said Fanta Aw, executive director of NAFSA: Association of International Educators, in an interview with NPR. She added that higher education institutions are gravely concerned about the message the administration’s policies are sending to the world, and the deterrent effect these measures could have.

To grasp the scale of international student presence in the U.S., it helps to look back. During the 1948–1949 academic year, there were slightly over 25,000 international students enrolled in U.S. colleges — just about 1% of the entire higher education population at the time, according to data from the Institute of International Education (IIE).

The international student population has grown enormously since then, particularly since 2006. According to the IIE’s analysis of data from the 2023–2024 academic year, there are now approximately 19 million students enrolled in U.S. colleges and universities, and about 6% — or over 1.1 million — of them are from other countries. This data was gathered from more than 680 institutions.

Several factors have driven this increase, said Aw. “One is the world becoming increasingly aware of the quality of education that is offered in the United States,” she explained. She added that earlier generations of students, upon returning home, often praised their American education, creating a powerful and organic recruitment pipeline.

Many world leaders and prominent figures received their higher education in the U.S., further boosting the country’s reputation as a global education hub. For instance, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attended the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, while King Philippe of Belgium earned a master’s degree in political science at Stanford University. Elon Musk, originally from South Africa and one of the world’s richest individuals, graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1997.

Aw also pointed out that U.S. colleges and universities began to actively recognize and seek out the financial and cultural advantages international students bring. This spurred more targeted recruitment efforts abroad. Moreover, the rise of the global middle class means that more families are now able to afford an overseas education, further driving growth.

Although international students come from all over the globe, recent data shows a clear geographic trend. For the 2023–2024 academic year, roughly 75% of international students in the U.S. hail from Asia, with more than half of that group originating from India and China.

While Harvard has been thrust into the spotlight by the Trump administration, it’s worth noting that it is not the leading host of international students in the U.S. According to the IIE’s most recent data, Harvard hasn’t ranked among the top 25 U.S. institutions hosting international students for some time.

Still, Harvard has a significant international presence. For the 2024–2025 academic year, nearly 7,000 international students from over 140 countries are enrolled there, making up more than 25% of the university’s total student population. When adding researchers and scholars, the international community at Harvard exceeds 10,000 individuals.

The universities that consistently top the list in terms of international student enrollment include New York University (NYU), which hosted close to 30,000 international students in the 2023–2024 school year. Northeastern University’s Boston campus typically follows closely behind, and Columbia University — another Ivy League school that has also faced criticism from the Trump administration — rounds out the top three.

Despite the administration’s focus on Harvard, its policies have broad implications for all U.S. colleges and universities that welcome international students. The tightening of visa policies, suspension of interviews, and the introduction of travel bans contribute to a growing sense of insecurity among students and institutions alike.

The cumulative effect of these measures, if sustained, could reshape the global academic landscape. International students who once viewed the U.S. as a premier destination may begin to look elsewhere. And for American institutions, the potential loss goes beyond finances — it includes diminished cultural diversity, weaker research output, and a reduced global presence.

As Fanta Aw noted, universities are acutely aware of the value international students bring. “Their contributions culturally, socially, strength of research, all of those things” are irreplaceable, she said. But unless there is a shift in the current policies, the U.S. risks losing not just students, but its long-standing reputation as the world’s leading destination for higher education.

AMA Warns Proposed Budget Bill Could Deepen Physician Shortage and Undermine Medical Education Access

June 7, 2025June 8, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The American Medical Association (AMA) has raised serious alarms over the 2025 budget-reconciliation bill, cautioning that if it passes the U.S. Senate in its current form, it would make medical school financially out of reach for most students, even those who are exceptionally qualified. The organization believes that such a shift in student-loan policy would not only limit access to the medical profession but would also worsen the already critical shortage of physicians across the United States.

As it stands, becoming a physician is one of the most demanding and high-stakes educational paths in the country. It requires four years of medical school, an additional three to seven years of residency training, and between 10,000 to 16,000 hours of clinical experience. This extensive and rigorous preparation ensures that physicians are the most capable members of any healthcare delivery team. “The high-stakes field of medicine demands education, expertise, acumen and coordination that is best delivered by a physician,” the AMA emphasized.

However, the cost of this education is already staggering. Medical school is the most expensive type of post-secondary education in the U.S., with over 70% of students graduating with an average debt of $212,341. In 2024, the cost of completing a medical degree at a public in-state school exceeded $286,000, while students at private medical schools faced expenses over $390,000.

Now, proposed legislative changes are threatening to make this educational path even less accessible. The AMA has responded by submitting official comments to Congress, outlining its concerns over specific elements of the bill—particularly changes affecting Federal Direct Unsubsidized Loans and Federal Direct Graduate (GRAD) PLUS loan programs.

One major proposal in the House version of the bill is a cap of $150,000 on the amount a student can borrow for professional education through Direct Unsubsidized Loans. This figure falls well short of the average financial requirement for medical school. Compounding the issue, the bill also calls for the elimination of both subsidized loans and GRAD PLUS loans, and it proposes limits on parental borrowing to support children’s education.

The bill doesn’t stop there. Another key change would redefine physician residency training, rendering it ineligible as a qualifying public service for the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program. This change could have a serious ripple effect. “Nearly 90% of medical school graduates carrying student debt last year who intended to enter into a loan forgiveness program said in their graduation questionnaire that they wished to participate in the PSLF program,” the AMA noted.

If residency no longer qualifies toward PSLF, fewer young physicians may be willing to take on jobs with eligible employers, many of which are located in rural or underserved regions. This would inevitably limit healthcare access for patients in the areas that most need it. As the AMA stated, “Denying PSLF eligibility to residents will harm patient care in those areas in greatest need.”

The consequences for healthcare access, especially in rural America, could be severe. Many patients already face long waits to see a physician or even difficulty in finding one at all. “Patients, particularly in rural areas, are having difficulty finding a physician and getting timely appointments,” the AMA said. This issue is likely to escalate given a projected physician shortfall that could reach 86,000 by the next decade.

A significant part of this shortage stems from demographics. Nearly half of all practicing physicians are 55 years or older, and one in five is over 65. At the same time, the U.S. population is steadily growing, with the number of individuals aged 75 and above expected to rise by nearly 55% by 2036. This trend will heighten the demand for and complexity of medical care.

Patients themselves continue to express strong support for physician-led care. According to recent AMA surveys, 91% of patients believe physicians’ education and training are essential for receiving optimal care, and 95% say it is important for doctors to play a role in their diagnosis and treatment.

In light of this, the AMA argues that Congress should be working to make it easier—not harder—for students to enter the medical profession. “At a time when our nation needs more physicians, Congress should be taking action to lessen the barriers for new physicians, not increasing the financial burden of their education,” the AMA asserted.

To address these challenges, the AMA is pushing for a multi-faceted approach aimed at reducing the financial strain on medical students. “The AMA believes that the cost of a medical education should never pose a barrier to a career in medicine,” the organization stated. Through its advocacy efforts—both independently and in partnership with others in the medical community—the AMA is pushing for policies that mitigate this burden.

This includes maintaining stable public funding for medical schools to help control tuition costs, encouraging financial literacy among students, and expanding service-based scholarships, such as those offered through the National Health Service Corps Program.

The AMA underlines the foundational role physicians play in the nation’s healthcare system and insists that everything possible should be done to strengthen that foundation. “Physicians are the foundation of our nation’s entire health care system, and we must make every effort to strengthen that foundation going forward.”

The changes proposed in the House bill could significantly shrink the pipeline of future doctors. They would do so by making medical school unaffordable, limiting available borrowing options, and removing incentives for doctors to work in areas most in need of healthcare services. “The student-loan changes now under consideration in Congress could reduce the pipeline of future physicians by making medical school unaffordable for many prospective students,” the AMA warned.

Ultimately, the AMA is calling on lawmakers to understand and support the unique and indispensable role physicians play. As the organization put it, “Congress should recognize the vital contributions and unique role of physicians in our society, and provide support for medical education that aligns with the financial and educational burdens physicians face as they provide the care that Americans want and deserve.”

In a healthcare landscape already stretched thin, the AMA’s message is clear: ensuring access to medical education is not just about helping students—it’s about safeguarding the health of an entire nation.

Indian Student Surge Drives Asia to Top Spot in U.S. International Education Landscape in 2024

June 6, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

A remarkable surge in Indian student enrollments has propelled Asia to become the leading continent of origin for international students in the United States in 2024, according to the latest “SEVIS by the Numbers” report released by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

This annual report, published by the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), reveals that student records for Indian nationals increased by a notable 11.8 percent over the previous year. Specifically, the U.S. saw an addition of 44,715 Indian student records in 2024, the largest jump among all nationalities. This dramatic growth placed India firmly at the top of the list of countries sending students to the U.S., with a total of 422,335 active student records — overtaking China, which recorded 329,541 active records, reflecting a minor decline of 824 students compared to 2023.

“Fueled by a sharp 11.8 percent increase in Indian student enrollments, Asia emerged as the top continent of origin for international students in the United States in 2024,” the report stated.

With these developments, Asia accounted for 71.7 percent of all active international student records in the country, a significant portion of which came from India and China. Together, these two countries represented over 47.5 percent of the entire Asian student population in the U.S., underscoring their dominant role in international education trends.

The total number of foreign students in the United States grew by 5.3 percent from 2023, reaching a cumulative 1,582,808 active records for F-1 and M-1 visa holders. This growth highlights a broader recovery and expansion in the international education sector following years of disruption due to the global pandemic.

Indian students also stood out in the area of post-graduation work opportunities. Nearly half — 48 percent — of all foreign students who participated in the STEM Optional Practical Training (OPT) extension in 2024 were Indian. The STEM OPT program, which allows graduates in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields to work in the U.S. for an extended period, attracted a total of 165,524 participants this year. Indian students’ strong representation in this area demonstrates both their academic focus and career ambitions in technical fields.

“Nearly half (48 percent) of all foreign students participating in the STEM Optional Practical Training (OPT) extension were from India,” the report noted.

In terms of academic level, the majority of Indian students in 2024 enrolled in graduate-level programs, with the data showing notable increases in both master’s and doctoral studies. Across all nationalities, master’s degree seekers grew by 9.7 percent, while those pursuing doctoral degrees saw a 4.1 percent increase. Specifically, 667,622 students registered in master’s programs and 214,824 chose doctoral tracks. These figures indicate a strong demand for advanced education among international students, with Indians leading the trend.

The academic interests of international students remained largely consistent with previous years, with Computer Science continuing as the most favored major. The report recorded 118,137 active student records in this field, reaffirming its popularity. Other top disciplines included Business Administration, Electrical Engineering, and Information Technology — all areas where Indian students have traditionally shown substantial interest and excelled.

“Computer Science remained the most popular major among international students, with 118,137 active records,” the report highlighted.

Employment opportunities for international students have also seen a significant boost. In 2024, a total of 194,554 foreign students were approved for Optional Practical Training (OPT), marking a 21.1 percent rise from the previous year. Among them, 95,384 were granted permission under the STEM OPT program, representing a substantial 54 percent increase. These numbers reflect a growing demand among students to gain hands-on experience in their fields after completing their academic programs.

“The report also noted a continued increase in employment authorization for international students. A total of 194,554 students were granted OPT in 2024, a 21.1 percent increase from the previous year, and 95,384 were authorized under STEM OPT — a 54 percent jump,” the document stated.

Geographically, California remained the most popular destination for international students, hosting 237,763 student records — the highest in the country. The Southern United States emerged as the fastest-growing region for international enrollments, recording an 8.5 percent increase. This was followed by the Midwest and Northeast regions, which also experienced healthy growth in student numbers.

“California remained the most popular state for international students, hosting 237,763 foreign student records. The South saw the highest regional growth at 8.5 percent,” the report revealed.

In terms of gender distribution among Indian students, the trend continued to show a higher proportion of male students. In 2024, the data revealed that Indian students were comprised of 38 percent females and 62 percent males. This gender pattern has remained largely consistent and reflects broader global trends in international higher education.

“In 2024, Indian students made up 38 percent female and 62 percent male enrollment,” the report observed.

Altogether, the findings of the SEVIS report point to a dynamic and expanding role for Indian students in the U.S. higher education landscape. With the highest growth in student records, dominant participation in STEM OPT, and significant enrollment in graduate-level programs, India has become the leading contributor to the international student population in the United States.

The overall rise in foreign student numbers, coupled with growing employment opportunities and a shift in geographical preferences, highlights the continued appeal of U.S. higher education among students worldwide. As Asia cements its status as the top region of origin, and India takes the lead among nations, the 2024 data underscores a shifting but strengthening global student mobility pattern centered around academic and professional aspirations in the United States.

CUNY Launches Research Platform Honoring Dr. Achyuta Samanta to Boost India-U.S. Educational Collaboration

June 4, 2025June 5, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

In a move aimed at strengthening academic collaboration between India and the United States, the City University of New York (CUNY) has unveiled a specialized research initiative dedicated to Indian educational and social development. The new platform, named the Achyuta Samanta India Initiative of the CUNY CREST Institute (ASIICCI), was inaugurated this week during a ribbon-cutting ceremony in New York. The event was graced by Dr. Achyuta Samanta himself, alongside Dr. Milton Santiago, President of Bronx Community College.

The ASIICCI is designed to focus on interdisciplinary research tackling India’s pressing educational and social issues. While the scope is national, special attention will be given to Odisha, the eastern Indian state where Dr. Samanta hails from and where much of his pioneering work has been implemented. Notably, this platform represents one of the rare occasions when a public university in the U.S. has named a research initiative after a living Indian personality.

Dr. Samanta is a renowned academic and social reformer who has significantly reshaped the education landscape in India, particularly for marginalized communities. He is the founder of both the Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) and the Kalinga Institute of Social Sciences (KISS), two institutions widely recognized for their unique combination of academic rigor and social impact.

KIIT has emerged as a comprehensive university offering education in multiple professional disciplines to more than 40,000 students. In parallel, KISS provides free-of-cost education, lodging, food, and healthcare to another 40,000 tribal children—many of whom are first-generation learners. This holistic model of development, where academic empowerment is seamlessly combined with community welfare, has drawn acclaim from both national and international observers.

CUNY officials emphasized that this model holds immense promise for addressing educational and social equity challenges globally. They see Dr. Samanta’s approach as one that successfully merges educational excellence with grassroots empowerment. By creating ASIICCI, CUNY hopes to give researchers and scholars a dedicated platform to explore and expand on this model, fostering innovative solutions to real-world problems.

“The initiative will provide a collaborative space where academics can engage in interdisciplinary research grounded in Dr. Samanta’s development framework,” said a CUNY representative. “It’s a rare honor to name such a platform after a living Indian educator, which speaks volumes about the global relevance of his work.”

CUNY is among the largest public university systems in the United States, with a student body of more than 300,000 individuals hailing from 122 different nationalities. This rich diversity provides a fertile ground for cross-cultural learning and global academic exchange. The launch of ASIICCI is expected to not only boost research efforts but also foster deeper educational ties between India and the U.S.

Dr. Samanta’s contributions to education and social upliftment have earned him international recognition. He has been awarded 67 honorary doctorates from universities across the globe, a distinction that places him among the most decorated Indian academicians and social workers still active today. This latest acknowledgment from CUNY further cements his standing as a global thought leader in inclusive education.

“Education is the most powerful tool for social transformation,” Dr. Samanta remarked during the ceremony. “This initiative symbolizes how nations can come together to share knowledge, promote equity, and create sustainable models for inclusive development.”

His vision of using education as a means to achieve broader social goals has influenced a growing global conversation about the role of academic institutions in addressing inequality. Through institutions like KIIT and KISS, Dr. Samanta has demonstrated that access to quality education can catalyze wide-ranging improvements in community health, economic opportunity, and gender equality.

Academic communities have praised the ASIICCI as a meaningful and timely tribute to a figure who continues to shape lives through education. “It’s not often that such honors are bestowed upon individuals while they are still actively contributing to the field,” said Dr. Milton Santiago. “This is not just a recognition; it’s an investment in a philosophy that believes education must serve the most underserved.”

The platform also seeks to facilitate student and faculty exchanges between India and the United States, enriching both sides through mutual learning and cultural exchange. Such programs are expected to enhance students’ global competencies and expose them to diverse methods of teaching, learning, and community engagement.

“This initiative will allow researchers from both countries to draw inspiration from each other and co-develop solutions that are both innovative and culturally rooted,” said another CUNY official.

Furthermore, by concentrating part of its research on Odisha, the ASIICCI aims to shed light on regional challenges often overlooked in broader academic discussions. Issues such as tribal education, healthcare access, and rural empowerment will be at the forefront of the platform’s agenda. The goal is to inform policy and practice not just in India, but globally.

Dr. Samanta’s model is especially pertinent at a time when educational institutions worldwide are grappling with how to better serve marginalized populations. His work underscores the importance of treating education not just as a means of intellectual development but as a comprehensive tool for societal transformation.

The ASIICCI will be hosted under the umbrella of the CUNY CREST Institute, known for its focus on climate resilience and environmental systems. The incorporation of the India Initiative under this multidisciplinary research center signifies a commitment to addressing complex global issues through collaborative and holistic strategies.

In the coming months, the platform will begin accepting research proposals, hosting workshops, and organizing seminars aimed at drawing international scholars into the conversation. It also plans to publish findings that can be used to guide public policy and institutional reforms in both countries.

Dr. Samanta expressed hope that the platform will not only further his mission but also inspire future generations of educators and social entrepreneurs. “I believe this initiative will become a beacon of collaboration, innovation, and inclusivity,” he said. “Together, we can build bridges of knowledge that span continents.”

In sum, the launch of the Achyuta Samanta India Initiative at CUNY signifies a meaningful step forward in global academic cooperation, rooted in the values of inclusion, empowerment, and shared learning. By spotlighting the work of one of India’s most influential educators, the initiative aims to create lasting impact both in India and across the globe.

International college students matter for the economy

June 4, 2025June 5, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Since late March, the government has been revoking international student visas or terminating their statuses, citing national security concerns. Then it stopped: While writing this Chalkboard post, a judge told the governmentit couldn’t do this. The government also recently told Harvard it was rescinding their authorization to enroll international students. Then, a different judge told the government it couldn’t do that to Harvard. And the latest as I write is that the government has cancelled new appointments to be cleared for a student visa.

By the time these words reach your screen, it’s anyone’s guess what new developments might affect international students enrolling in U.S. colleges and universities. So, let’s not talk about the legal stuff or politics.

Let’s talk about economics.

In particular, let’s talk about international students and our trade deficit. For a quick summary of the impact international students have, it’s hard to do better than Catherine Rampell’s column from April.

President Donald Trump says he wants to reduce our trade deficit. Yet he’s destroying one of our winningest exports: higher education. Colleges and universities are among America’s most competitive international exporters. . . We also run a huge trade surplus in this sector, meaning that foreigners buy much more education from the United States than Americans buy from other countries.

Catherine Rampell, Washington Post

I covered the issue for the Brown Center on Education Policy before the pandemic in 2017 and then again in 2018. Since then, education—primarily higher education—has become an increasingly important factor in the U.S. trade deficit. Exports occur when foreign buyers spend money on American goods or services. In this case, international students bring both their presence and their tuition payments, with the product being a degree or certificate. The figure below shows inflation-adjusted exports and imports in the education sector since 1999.

America’s education trade surplus has skyrocketed since 1999

U.S. education exports and imports in billions of 2024 dollars

Education exports have skyrocketed, then dipped during the pandemic, and have now recovered. Imports—in the form of Americans studying abroad—have also risen, but not nearly as fast as exports. Throughout this time, America’s trade surplus in the education sector (the difference between the export and import lines) has consistently benefited the United States. The education trade surplus has grown more than threefold over the past 25 years, rising from $12 billion in 1999 to over $43 billion in 2024, adjusted for inflation.

We’ll return to talking about the trade deficit below, but first let’s consider some of the high-level economic effects of spending by the one million-plus international students when they come to the United States.

According to NAFSA: Association of International Educators, international students in the higher education sector supported almost 400,000 jobs in the 2023-24 school year. Half of the jobs were directly within colleges and universities, while the other half resulted from student spending on housing, food, retail, and other living expenses. About one-fifth of the jobs came from housing, and another fifth from food and retail spending.

Suppose we toss international students out, or just make them feel unwelcome so they don’t come. The instant economic impact of losing them would be losing their tuition dollars. At public universities, international students pay out-of-state or “non-resident” tuition and fees, which are substantially higher than what they charge in-state students. International students—or more specifically, their tuition dollars—are an essential ingredient that make the “high cost, high aid” models at many selective U.S. colleges work. As an example, the University of California (where I work) teaches roughly one international undergraduate for every nine California students. But there are two financial differences: International tuition is more than triple the tuition for California students, and while over half of California undergraduates have their tuition fully covered by aid, international students receive essentially no financial aid. One way to look at it is that a significant portion of financial aid for California students is funded by the higher tuition paid by international students.

Looking ahead, market trends in the higher education business are quite clear—and international students can clearly make a difference. College attendance by Americans is at an all-time high but is expected to decline sharply over the next 15 years, in large part because there are simply fewer children in the United States. That means there will be many open spaces available in U.S. institutions to be filled by international students. If we lose international students while domestic enrollments are also falling, many colleges will have to shrink or, in some cases, shut down.

Finally, there are the indirect economic effects, which are much harder to measure. The leaders of many nations boast American degrees, including leaders of Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Cambodia, Egypt, Iceland, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, and Spain. And eight prime ministers or presidents of foreign countries have Harvard degrees, including Canada, Greece, Singapore, and Taiwan. It’s difficult to assign a dollar value to American-educated leaders governing much of the world, but their influence is undoubtedly valuable for international relations in both politics and business. And of course, there’s more than money involved with international students in U.S. colleges. American students benefit from getting to know students from other countries and other cultures. And I believe international students leave with admiration for much of what America represents and warm feelings toward its people.

Higher education is an internationally competitive industry, which the U.S. has dominated for a long time. The top four destination countries for foreign students are the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Destinations succeed in this competition both due to the high quality of their higher education and the preference of students and families for education in English. Interestingly, several of these other leading countries are also grappling with internal clashes over immigration. For example, Canada has capped the number of student visas it will provide, reducing them by about a third compared to two years ago. Australia is also cutting back on international students numbers. This presents an opportunity for the United States to capture a larger share of the market, provided migration concerns can be addressed.

Returning to the balance-of-trade issue, a term frequently used by the Trump administration is “non-tariff barriers.” These are measures such as regulations or unnecessary inspections that countries use to limit imports without formally imposing tariffs. Oddly, the administration appears to be adding to these non-tariff barriers on U.S. higher education exports by revoking visas and creating an unwelcoming environment for many international students. To help reduce the overall trade deficit, this moment offers a strategic opportunity to attract more students to the United States rather than impose additional obstacles.

Source Credit: By Dick Startz (Brookings.edu)s

Rubio Announces Aggressive Visa Revocations for Chinese Students Amid National Security Concerns

May 29, 2025May 31, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared on Wednesday that the United States will start “aggressively revoking visas” for Chinese students, particularly those linked to the Chinese Communist Party or those enrolled in sensitive academic disciplines. This measure marks a significant escalation in the U.S. government’s scrutiny of foreign students, particularly those from China and Hong Kong.

According to a statement from Rubio, the U.S. State Department will coordinate with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to carry out these visa revocations. In addition, visa requirements for Chinese and Hong Kong nationals will undergo stricter evaluations to prevent any potential risks associated with academic espionage or ideological infiltration.

“The U.S. will begin revoking visas of Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields,” Rubio posted on X, previously known as Twitter.

This announcement follows a broader tightening of immigration and student visa policies by the Trump administration. Just a day prior to Rubio’s statement, the administration instructed U.S. embassies and consulates around the world to halt scheduling visa interviews for international students temporarily. The decision was made as officials deliberate over expanding social media checks and security vetting procedures for visa applicants.

An internal communication from the State Department, signed by Rubio and issued on Tuesday, clarified the immediate changes. As reported by several media outlets, the directive said: “Effective immediately, in preparation for an expansion of required social media screening and vetting, consular sections should not add any additional student or exchange visitor (F, M, and J) visa appointment capacity until further guidance is issued [separate telegram], which we anticipate in the coming days.”

This directive signals a strong commitment by the administration to further scrutinize foreign students and exchange visitors. Earlier in the year, the administration had already taken action by revoking the visas of thousands of international students. Though some relief came later when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reinstated over 1,500 of those visa registrations in its system, the overall trend has been toward increased restrictions.

In a related development last week, the DHS took steps to shut down Harvard University’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program. This move would effectively prevent the prestigious Ivy League institution from enrolling new international students. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem emphasized the consequences for affected students, stating that they would have to transfer to a different institution or face the risk of falling out of legal immigration status.

Adding to the growing list of restrictions, President Donald Trump on Wednesday proposed placing a 15 percent cap on the number of foreign students allowed at Harvard and other U.S. higher education institutions. The president’s rationale stemmed from what he sees as an overrepresentation of international students at elite universities, which he believes displaces qualified American applicants.

While speaking with reporters in the Oval Office, Trump argued that international students occupy too large a portion of the student population and expressed concern about the influence some of them may have on campus. “These countries aren’t helping us. They’re not investing in Harvard … we are. So why would 31 percent — why would a number so big,” Trump said. “I think they should have a cap of maybe around 15 percent, not 31 percent.”

Trump further voiced frustration that American students often struggle to gain admission to top universities because international students take many of the available slots. He also raised security concerns, linking foreign students to potential threats and unrest.

“We have people [who] want to go to Harvard and other schools, [but] they can’t get in because we have foreign students there,” Trump said. “But I want to make sure that the foreign students are people that can love our country. We don’t want to see shopping centers exploding. We don’t want to see the kind of riots that you had.”

He went on to suggest that some of the recent civil unrest in the United States may have been fueled by foreign students. “And I’ll tell you what, many of those students didn’t go anywhere. Many of those students were troublemakers caused by the radical left lunatics in this country,” Trump remarked.

Although he did not offer specifics, the president also expressed a desire to prevent “radical people” from entering the country under the guise of education. “I don’t want radical people coming into our country and making trouble,” he said.

The administration’s actions, including visa revocations, social media screening expansions, and institutional penalties, reflect a broad and aggressive posture aimed at reshaping the landscape of international education in the United States. Critics argue that such measures could damage the U.S.’s global educational standing and reduce cultural and academic exchange. However, supporters of the policy insist that national security and the integrity of American institutions must take precedence.

Rubio’s announcement and the White House’s follow-up proposals underscore a coordinated effort to curb what officials perceive as undue influence and security risks associated with certain categories of international students, particularly those from geopolitical rivals like China. While the long-term consequences of these changes remain to be seen, the immediate impact is a dramatic shift in how the United States handles student visas, placing unprecedented emphasis on ideology, loyalty, and national origin.

The administration’s latest actions are expected to draw both domestic and international scrutiny. Universities may push back against enrollment limits, and legal challenges could arise, particularly around accusations of discrimination or due process violations. Meanwhile, Chinese and other international students may face increased uncertainty and anxiety as they attempt to navigate the evolving U.S. immigration landscape.

As the administration continues to tighten its policies, the future of global academic collaboration and the reputation of American higher education as a welcoming destination for students from around the world may be called into question. Nonetheless, Rubio and Trump appear resolute in their belief that these steps are essential to safeguard national interests and restore control over who is allowed to study in the United States.

Global Universities Eye Harvard’s International Students as Trump Administration Imposes Ban

May 27, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

If President Donald Trump is determined to keep international students out of Harvard, there are numerous foreign governments and academic institutions ready to welcome them—along with the exceptional talent that has contributed significantly to making the U.S. a world leader in science and technology.

The future of international students at Harvard University, the nation’s oldest and most prestigious educational institution, is in limbo following the Trump administration’s announcement of a ban on new international enrollments starting in the 2025-26 academic year.

This decision came after Harvard declined to submit extensive data on its international student population. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem accused the university of “fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus.”

In response, Harvard filed a lawsuit calling the ban unlawful. A federal judge in Boston has temporarily halted the policy for two weeks. However, if the administration ultimately wins in court, incoming international students will be prohibited from enrolling at Harvard, while current international students may be forced to transfer to other institutions or risk losing their legal status in the country.

American universities, including Harvard, depend heavily on international students, not only for the higher tuition fees they typically pay but also for their contributions to fields crucial to national advancement, such as artificial intelligence. Many international students choose to remain in the U.S. post-graduation and have played central roles in key innovations in globally competitive sectors.

According to Simon Marginson, a professor of higher education at the University of Oxford, Trump’s move against Harvard represents a “terrible policy error” that could diminish the United States’ leading status in research and development—a position it has held since World War II. In an email to NBC News, Marginson noted that a drop in international students could disrupt the U.S. higher education “talent pipeline” and reduce financial income for American universities, ultimately benefitting foreign rivals. “China will become significantly more attractive than before to students and researchers from the Global South,” he stated. “Western Europe will also gain significantly.”

Even before this ban, international students in the U.S. were growing increasingly uneasy due to the Trump administration’s anti-immigration tone, significant budget cuts to education, and attempts to interfere with the internal governance of universities. The government has already revoked hundreds of student visas and detained others based on their involvement in pro-Palestinian activism or other causes.

At Harvard, international students make up over 25 percent of the 25,000-member student body. The impending restriction impacts students from more than 140 nations, including high-profile individuals such as the future queen of Belgium.

China remains the largest source of Harvard’s international students, constituting roughly 20 percent of its foreign student population. China was previously the top source of international students in the U.S. until India surpassed it last year. The overall number of Chinese students in the United States has already been declining, with about 277,000 enrolled during the 2023-24 academic year compared to more than 372,000 in 2019-20. This drop is attributed to the disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic and increasing tensions between Washington and Beijing.

During Trump’s first term, the administration implemented the China Initiative, a national security effort that many criticized for racial profiling. As a result, numerous Chinese academics relocated their research activities back to universities in China.

In response to the ban affecting Harvard, Beijing has reaffirmed the importance of U.S.-China educational cooperation. Chinese officials insisted the collaboration is “mutually beneficial” and pledged to protect “the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese students and scholars overseas.” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning remarked, “China has consistently opposed the politicization of educational exchanges,” and warned that “such actions by the U.S. will only damage its own image and international credibility.”

Izzy Shen, a 23-year-old incoming student from Beijing who was accepted into Harvard’s Master in Design Engineering program, shared that her visa application was suddenly denied just hours after the ban was declared. “I didn’t expect it to be so fast,” said Shen, noting that her application had previously been marked as “approved.” Despite the setback, Shen said she remains “relatively optimistic” and expects the situation to become “clearer” after the upcoming injunction hearing.

Duo Yi, admitted to Harvard Kennedy School’s doctoral program in public policy, said she is now evaluating alternative plans due to the unpredictability surrounding her enrollment status. “Trump is simply too unpredictable,” she commented. “I have no way of knowing what direction his future policies will take.”

Meanwhile, international universities and governments are not waiting to offer alternatives. In Hong Kong, officials are encouraging universities to act swiftly to attract high-performing students who might be affected by the U.S. ban. The territory’s chief executive, John Lee, declared, “Hong Kong’s doors are wide open” to “any students who face discrimination and unfair treatment in the U.S.”

Hong Kong hosts four universities ranked in the top 100 globally by U.S. News & World Report, a list led by Harvard. However, analysts caution that academic freedom in the region has significantly diminished since the Chinese government imposed a national security law in 2020.

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology announced that it would welcome both current and incoming Harvard undergraduate and graduate students affected by the ban.

Across the Atlantic, Europe is also moving to capitalize on concerns about U.S. policies by launching a $570 million initiative titled “Choose Europe.” This program aims to attract scientists and scholars alarmed by funding instability and political interference under Trump’s leadership. In a speech at Sorbonne University in Paris, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen promoted the campaign, emphasizing “free and open research.” She added, “As threats rise across the world, Europe will not compromise on its principles. Europe must remain the home of academic and scientific freedom.”

Despite the uncertainty surrounding the future of international students at Harvard, Alex Zeng, an overseas education consultant based in Guangzhou, China, said that elite American universities continue to appeal strongly to Chinese families. “The rich still want to go to the U.S. for education,” Zeng explained.

With Harvard’s status under scrutiny and the Trump administration tightening immigration and education policies, the global landscape of higher education appears to be shifting. As other countries move to fill the gap, the United States risks not only losing its competitive edge but also the immense human capital that has historically fueled its academic and technological leadership.

Invalidation of Amara Chepuri’s Eligibility for the 2025 Scripps National Spelling Bee Contested

May 27, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation, Nation 0

A Public Statement from the Educational Fairness Alliance

Amara Chepuri, a high-achieving Florida student and serious contender for the 2025 Scripps National Spelling Bee title, was unjustly prevented from advancing due to a documented procedural failure at her school-level spelling bee on December 11, 2024.

According to the official rules established by Scripps, a spelling bee must conclude with a Championship Round and a Championship Word spelled correctly to validly determine a winner. Specifically, if only one student correctly spells a word in a round, that student must then correctly spell a second word—the “anticipated championship word”—to be declared champion. If the student misspells that word, all prior spellers must be reinstated and a new round must begin.¹

In Amara’s case, no such round occurred, and no final word was administered. Instead, local officials prematurely declared another student the winner and excluded Amara from further advancement—even though the required end-of-bee procedure never took place. Video footage and official competition data confirm this violation.

Although Amara was denied advancement through her school, she went on to win the Rays/Rowdies Baseball Foundation regional bee through an alternate sponsor—thereby independently earning her place at the national level.

Nevertheless, Scripps later invalidated her regional first place title and revoked her national eligibility, citing the original unjust school-level disqualification. That disqualification, however, was the result of a bee that failed to conclude properly under Scripps’ own rules. In such cases, the rules expressly provide that if officials failed to follow the proper End-of-Bee Procedure, and the bee has concluded, authorization must be obtained to send both the erroneously declared winner and the wrongly excluded student(s) to the next level of competition.² This remedy was not applied in Amara’s case.

In a February 17, 2025 letter, Scripps Executive Director Corrie Loeffler stated: “We took the rare and extraordinary measure of reviewing the records from that bee. The records reflect that the officials conducted the competition in accordance with normal spelling bee procedures.” Yet the record clearly shows that the competition did not include the required championship round—rendering its conclusion inconsistent with “normal” procedure under Scripps’ own Rule 8.

While Scripps describes its rules as “suggested” at the local level, that discretion ends when the national organization chooses to enforce a local outcome. By reviewing the records, validating the school’s result, and revoking Amara Chepuri’s regional win, Scripps exercised direct oversight and assumed responsibility for the outcome. It cannot now disavow accountability for a decision it both reviewed and enforced.

Furthermore, the requirement that a spelling bee conclude with a Championship Round and a correctly spelled Championship Word is not optional—it is essential to the integrity of the competition. Because this did not occur, the competition was not properly concluded, and no disqualification could be valid. Scripps had both the authority and the obligation to apply its own procedural remedy for judging errors—a remedy it has applied in prior cases—but failed to do so here. That failure directly resulted in the improper exclusion of a deserving student.

This is not a technicality. It is the denial of a student’s right to a fair and rule-based competition in a nationally recognized academic program. It violates the Florida Student and Parental Bill of Rights, which guarantees students equitable and transparent treatment in education settings. A Florida student who followed all the rules was unjustly prevented from advancing—without meaningful recourse or acknowledgment from the institutions involved.

The refusal of Scripps and its sponsor, Rays/Rowdies Baseball Foundation to recognize and correct this procedural failure raises serious concerns about fairness and accountability in high-stakes academic settings. Families must be able to trust that educational institutions will uphold their own rules—especially when a student’s academic future is on the line.

About the Educational Fairness Alliance

The Educational Fairness Alliance is a nonpartisan advocacy organization committed to protecting students’ rights and promoting transparency, equity, and integrity in academic programs and competitions nationwide.

Footnotes

1. 2025 Suggested Rules for Spelling Bees, Rule 8 (End-of-Bee Procedure): “If only one speller spells correctly… the speller is given an opportunity to spell a word on the list (anticipated championship word). If the speller succeeds… [they are] declared the champion. If [they] misspell… a new spelling round begins with all spellers who participated in the previous round.”

2. 2025 Suggested Rules for Spelling Bees, Rule 9(E): “If [officials] erred and the competition has concluded, contact the spelling bee coordinator for the next level… to send both your declared champion and the speller(s) affected by the error to the next level of competition.”

(The above statement reflects the views of the concerned parties, shared with us for publication in our news portal. Our request to Scripps National Spelling Bee for their response to the above remains unanswered.

Trump Demands Disclosure on Harvard’s Foreign Students, Escalates Battle with Elite University

May 26, 2025May 27, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

President Donald Trump intensified his criticism of Harvard University on Sunday, questioning the presence of foreign students and demanding transparency about who they are and where they come from. His comments follow recent actions by the Department of Homeland Security, which attempted to restrict the university’s ability to enroll international students—a move that has stirred significant controversy.

“Why isn’t Harvard saying that almost 31% of their students are from FOREIGN LANDS, and yet those countries, some not at all friendly to the United States, pay NOTHING toward their student’s education, nor do they ever intend to,” Trump said in a post. He added, “Nobody told us that! We want to know who those foreign students are, a reasonable request since we give Harvard BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, but Harvard isn’t exactly forthcoming. We want those names and countries. Harvard has $52,000,000, use it, and stop asking for the Federal Government to continue GRANTING money to you!”

The university has stated that it enrolled around 6,800 international students in the 2024-2025 academic year, which amounts to approximately 27 percent of its total student body, slightly lower than the figure Trump cited. These students come from a variety of countries and, according to Harvard’s publicly available data, pay full tuition for their education. International students are typically not eligible for U.S. federal financial aid, which means that their tuition payments may, in fact, contribute to supporting institutional costs for domestic students.

Despite the financial contribution international students make to Harvard, Trump’s statements reflect growing political tension over elite academic institutions and their perceived alignment with liberal values, diversity efforts, and global engagement. Some observers believe that limiting the number of foreign students at Harvard could create more openings for American applicants. While this idea may resonate with certain groups, it also raises concerns about the long-term implications for higher education and the global academic reputation of U.S. universities.

Trump has been locked in an extended battle with Harvard, the nation’s oldest and most financially robust university. His grievances range from accusations of antisemitism on campus to allegations of racial and ideological bias embedded within the school’s policies and curriculum. This latest attack zeroes in on the university’s global makeup and its relationship with the federal government.

The president’s repeated targeting of Harvard has coincided with his broader efforts to reshape the direction of American education and reduce what he sees as liberal dominance in the nation’s academic institutions. He has accused the school of failing to uphold American values and has specifically condemned its diversity initiatives. His actions have not only affected Harvard but also sent ripples through the broader higher education landscape, with other institutions watching closely.

Trump’s demands come on the heels of a legal victory for Harvard, which recently challenged the Department of Homeland Security’s attempt to block the enrollment of foreign students. A federal judge intervened on Friday, issuing a temporary halt to the policy. This ruling gives Harvard a brief reprieve as it continues to litigate the matter. The university has also filed a separate lawsuit against the Trump administration over billions of dollars in federal research funding that the administration froze in retaliation for Harvard’s refusal to dismantle its diversity programs.

The financial stakes in this clash are substantial. Harvard’s endowment exceeds $52 billion, making it the wealthiest university in the country. Despite this vast financial reserve, the school still receives significant federal research grants, which Trump now threatens to cut off permanently. In his remarks, Trump insisted Harvard should use its own funds instead of relying on taxpayer money, arguing that “Harvard has $52,000,000, use it, and stop asking for the Federal Government to continue GRANTING money to you!”

The battle over foreign student enrollment has sparked broader concerns within the academic community about the future of U.S. higher education under increasing political scrutiny. Universities across the country are grappling with how to respond to shifting federal policies, particularly those targeting diversity, free speech, and foreign influence. Many fear that aggressive moves against institutions like Harvard could set a precedent that undermines the academic freedom and international prestige that American universities have long enjoyed.

Moreover, Trump’s rhetoric seems tailored to resonate with a portion of the electorate that views elite institutions as out of touch and unaccountable. His emphasis on Harvard receiving “BILLIONS OF DOLLARS” in federal funds plays into a narrative that taxpayer money is being funneled to liberal strongholds that do not reflect mainstream American values. By questioning the loyalty and financial accountability of international students, Trump appears to be doubling down on his America First platform, extending its reach to education policy.

At the same time, Trump’s critics argue that these attacks risk doing real damage to U.S. interests. International students not only bring in substantial revenue to American universities but also contribute to the nation’s economy and innovation ecosystem. Many go on to become researchers, entrepreneurs, and community leaders. Policies that discourage their enrollment could have long-term repercussions, both academically and economically.

The president’s call for disclosure of international students’ names and countries of origin also raises privacy concerns. While universities typically collect this information, releasing it could pose legal and ethical challenges. Critics warn that such demands might violate student privacy rights and increase the vulnerability of certain students, especially those from politically sensitive or conflict-affected regions.

Harvard, for its part, has remained largely restrained in its public responses, relying instead on legal avenues to contest the administration’s directives. By pursuing litigation, the university aims to protect not only its own interests but also those of other academic institutions that could be similarly targeted in the future.

The ongoing legal battle over foreign students and diversity funding is emblematic of the deeper ideological clash between Trump’s vision of a nationalist, merit-based educational system and the more global, inclusive approach favored by institutions like Harvard. As the 2024 presidential election cycle heats up, it’s likely that these cultural flashpoints will continue to be politicized, with elite universities caught in the crossfire.

While Trump’s latest salvo may energize his base, it also underscores the growing divide over the role of education in shaping America’s future. For universities, the challenge will be navigating this contentious landscape while upholding their commitments to academic excellence, inclusivity, and global engagement.

In the meantime, Harvard’s legal and public relations teams are preparing for what could be a prolonged battle over the school’s autonomy and access to federal support. Whether the university’s endowment will be enough to shield it from the political fallout remains to be seen. But what is certain is that the fight over foreign students is only the latest front in a much larger war over the soul of American higher education.

Judge Blocks Trump Administration from Ending Legal Status of Foreign Students

May 23, 2025May 25, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

A federal judge has issued a nationwide injunction stopping the Trump administration from revoking the legal status of foreign students studying in the United States. The ruling, delivered on Thursday by US District Judge Jeffrey White of the federal court in San Francisco, marks a significant setback for the administration’s efforts to clamp down on international students as part of President Donald Trump’s broader immigration enforcement agenda.

The legal dispute centers around the administration’s sweeping attempt to interfere with the SEVIS (Student and Exchange Visitor Information System) records of non-citizens present in the U.S. on education visas. These modifications to the SEVIS database threatened the students’ ability to remain in the country legally, thereby putting them at risk of deportation.

The SEVIS system, managed by the Department of Homeland Security, serves as a database that tracks the immigration status of international students and is essential for universities to monitor their enrollment and legal standing. In a controversial move that began in April, the Trump administration initiated the cancellation of SEVIS records for thousands of these students, potentially rendering them undocumented.

Although the administration retreated from this effort last month in response to mounting legal opposition, Judge White determined in his decision that the threat of future arbitrary cancellations remains. In his ruling, he stated, “He does not find it speculative to conclude that, in the absence of an injunction, the administration would abruptly re-terminate SEVIS records without notice.”

White, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, emphasized that the actions undertaken by the administration had far-reaching and disruptive consequences. “The administration’s actions,” he wrote, “uniformly wreaked havoc not only on the lives of Plaintiffs here but on similarly situated F-1 nonimmigrants across the United States and continues to do so.”

The lawsuit was initiated by a group of international students who had experienced sudden and unexplained changes to their SEVIS records. These changes led to their legal status being jeopardized, with the students asserting that the administration had acted without following proper legal procedures.

Judge White agreed with their claims, indicating that the students were likely to succeed in their argument that the administration’s actions breached federal rule-making protocols. He characterized the actions as “arbitrary and capricious,” terms that carry significant legal weight in administrative law.

He also dismissed any suggestion by the government that these students posed a danger to the public or to national security. “Defendants do not suggest that these individuals pose an immediate safety threat or that they pose a threat to national security,” he wrote. “In contrast, Plaintiffs have shown that Defendants likely exceeded their authority and acted arbitrarily and capriciously in those enforcement efforts, and the ‘public interest is served by compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act.’”

The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) is a foundational statute in U.S. administrative law that governs how federal agencies develop and enforce regulations. The judge’s reference to the APA underscores the administration’s failure to follow due process when attempting to alter or terminate the SEVIS records of foreign students.

The preliminary injunction issued by Judge White means that the federal government must cease any further attempts to change or cancel international students’ legal status via the SEVIS system without first following the appropriate procedural steps. His decision provides temporary relief to international students across the country who faced the risk of deportation due to abrupt and unexplained changes to their legal status.

This development is just the latest in a series of legal battles over the Trump administration’s handling of immigration matters, particularly as they pertain to education and student visas. During his time in office, Trump frequently advocated for stricter immigration policies, often targeting international students as part of a broader narrative emphasizing national security and economic protectionism.

The injunction also brings attention to the significant role that international students play within the U.S. higher education system. Universities rely heavily on SEVIS to manage the legal and academic status of their foreign enrollees, and any abrupt change to the system can create significant confusion and fear.

In this instance, many universities were left scrambling to understand and respond to the cancellations, which were often issued without explanation. The affected students found themselves in precarious situations, sometimes with little warning or opportunity to appeal the decision.

According to White, the government’s failure to justify these cancellations or to provide a meaningful process for students to respond only compounded the harm. “In contrast, Plaintiffs have shown that Defendants likely exceeded their authority and acted arbitrarily and capriciously,” he wrote, reinforcing the argument that the administration sidestepped established legal norms.

While the decision is currently limited to a preliminary injunction—meaning the final outcome of the case remains to be decided—it sets an important legal precedent for how student visa records should be handled. The ruling sends a strong signal that executive agencies must operate within the confines of the law, especially when taking actions that could severely disrupt the lives of thousands of people.

Legal experts suggest the ruling could have lasting implications for how future administrations approach visa enforcement, particularly when dealing with non-citizens enrolled in academic institutions. The judge’s insistence on following rule-making protocols under the APA highlights the judiciary’s role in checking executive power and ensuring that government agencies cannot act with unchecked discretion.

The ruling also highlights how legal action can serve as an effective countermeasure against sudden and potentially unlawful government policies. For the international students who brought the case forward, the decision offers not only temporary relief but also a measure of validation for their claim that they were treated unfairly by the system.

In conclusion, Judge Jeffrey White’s ruling represents a meaningful check on the Trump administration’s immigration policy by affirming that federal procedures and the rights of individuals cannot be cast aside arbitrarily. His order to block the cancellation of SEVIS records serves to protect international students who came to the U.S. to study and underscores the importance of legal consistency and due process in administrative actions.

Trump Administration Revokes Harvard’s Certification to Enroll International Students Amid Compliance Dispute

May 23, 2025May 25, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation, Business 0

Harvard University has been stripped of its Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification, a decision that now prevents the institution from enrolling new international students and forces current international students to transfer or risk losing their legal immigration status in the United States. This immediate action by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was confirmed in a letter from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to Harvard, as first reported by The New York Times.

The DHS announcement marks a significant escalation in tensions between Harvard and the federal government, particularly under the Trump administration. According to the press release from the department, Harvard’s certification has been revoked “effective immediately,” which means the prestigious university no longer has the legal authority to host international students.

This punitive measure stems from Harvard’s refusal to comply with a recent government request for detailed information about its international student body. Specifically, the Trump administration sought records tied to “criminality and misconduct of foreign students on its campus.” Harvard declined to provide the requested data, leading to the current crackdown.

Jason Newton, Harvard’s director of media relations and communications, responded strongly to the move in a statement to Forbes. “The government’s action was unlawful,” he asserted. Newton emphasized that the university is “fully committed to maintaining Harvard’s ability to host our international students and scholars,” and warned that the “retaliatory action threatens serious harm to the Harvard community and our country, and undermines Harvard’s academic and research mission.”

The Trump administration, however, has signaled that it may reconsider the revocation if Harvard complies with its conditions within 72 hours. According to the letter from Noem, the university must provide extensive documentation including audio and video recordings of “any illegal, dangerous or violent activity,” along with evidence of “threats to other students or university personnel” committed by international students over the past five years. The DHS has also demanded access to disciplinary records and video footage of any protest activity involving international students on Harvard’s campus within the same timeframe.

The backdrop to this conflict involves a broader federal investigation. Harvard is among roughly 60 universities under scrutiny for alleged antisemitism. On April 11, the administration accused the school of failing to meet both “intellectual and civil rights conditions that justify federal investment.” In response to earlier demands, the Trump administration called for “meaningful governance” reforms at Harvard and requested ongoing federal oversight of the institution. Harvard pushed back, stating through its legal counsel that it could not “allow itself to be taken over by the federal government” and refused to “accept the government’s terms as an agreement in principle.”

Following this refusal, the administration froze an estimated $2.2 billion in federal grants to Harvard. The university responded by suing the federal government, arguing that the freeze was “unlawful and beyond the government’s authority.”

Harvard’s international student population is substantial and diverse. According to official university figures, 6,793 international students are enrolled at Harvard during the 2024-25 academic year. This accounts for nearly 27% of the student body. The revocation decision, therefore, has far-reaching implications not just for the university but for thousands of students from around the globe.

Abdullah Shahid Sial, an international student from Pakistan and co-president of Harvard’s undergraduate student body, described the atmosphere on campus to the Boston Globe. “People are more scared than ever…This is a story which is way bigger than an individual. It’s not just about internationals at Harvard,it’s about internationals everywhere…we want to make sure that people put up an opposition.”

In defending the federal government’s action, Noem stated in the DHS release, “Harvard had plenty of opportunity to do the right thing. It refused. Let this serve as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country.”

The backlash has been swift and vocal. Lawrence Summers, a former U.S. Treasury Secretary who served as Harvard’s president from 2001 to 2006, criticized the administration’s decision in an interview with Bloomberg. “This is vicious, it is illegal, it is unwise, and it is very damaging,” he said. Summers added, “Why does it make any sense at all to stop 6000 enormously talented young people who want to come to the United States to study from having that opportunity? Why is punishing them the right thing to do?”

The revocation of Harvard’s SEVP certification, if not reversed, could also trigger broader academic and diplomatic consequences. The university’s international students, many of whom contribute to research, innovation, and the global reputation of American higher education, now face uncertainty about their futures. For Harvard, the move is not just a legal or financial issue, but a fundamental challenge to its identity as a global educational institution.

The administration’s action also sends a chilling message to other academic institutions that might find themselves at odds with federal policies or demands. With the warning issued by Noem, it is clear that the Trump administration is willing to use immigration and funding mechanisms as leverage in disputes with universities.

Harvard now faces a complex and urgent dilemma: whether to comply with the federal demands and potentially compromise its principles of academic independence and student privacy, or to continue its legal battle with the risk of permanent damage to its international programs and funding.

The next 72 hours will be crucial. If the university fails to meet the DHS requirements within that period, the fate of thousands of international students will remain in jeopardy. Meanwhile, Harvard’s lawsuit over the $2.2 billion in frozen grants continues to unfold, adding legal complexity to an already explosive political and academic confrontation.

This conflict between Harvard and the Trump administration underscores a larger national debate over academic freedom, government oversight, and the rights of international students. As this story develops, the outcome may well set a precedent for how the U.S. government interacts with institutions of higher education and how those institutions defend their autonomy in a politically charged environment.

Arizona State University Celebrates Record Number of Indian Graduates in Spring Commencement

May 13, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

This spring, Arizona State University (ASU) celebrated a major milestone by awarding degrees to 1,800 students from India, making it one of the largest graduating groups of Indian nationals in the institution’s history. These students were part of ASU’s largest-ever spring graduating class, which surpassed 21,000 students in total. Among these were more than 3,000 international students, reflecting the university’s growing global appeal and commitment to diversity in higher education.

India continues to be ASU’s top source of international students. The university currently enrolls around 7,000 students from India, with the majority pursuing graduate programs. This significant presence underscores the strong academic and cultural ties between ASU and India and highlights the university’s role as a leading destination for Indian students seeking advanced education in the United States.

One of the standout Indian graduates this spring was Omkaar Shenoy, a computer science student from Kerala. During his time at ASU, Shenoy made notable contributions to the university community by applying his programming skills at the Office of Media Relations. His work helped improve operational efficiency, showcasing how international students like him enrich the university beyond academics. Shenoy earned his degree from the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and is preparing to begin his professional journey with Aramark, a hospitality company based in Philadelphia.

Reflecting on his experience, Shenoy credited the university for supporting his career aspirations and helping him build a versatile skill set. “ASU was very helpful in terms of giving me the resources to find this job,” he said. “The university also gave me a great foundation in coding and a broader skill set in media and sciences, which allowed me to explore my creative side.”

Another Indian student, Ana Girish, completed her degree in aerospace engineering with a focus on astronautics. Her academic achievements have already translated into a promising career, as she has been hired as an associate product engineer by Solestial, a startup based in Arizona that specializes in developing solar panels for use in space. Girish’s accomplishment is a testament to the rigorous education and professional preparation offered by ASU’s engineering programs, as well as to the increasing role Indian students are playing in emerging technologies.

ASU President Michael Crow recently visited India and emphasized the university’s continued dedication to strengthening ties with the country. He expressed optimism about the growing number of Indian students choosing ASU for their education and reaffirmed the institution’s commitment to their success.

“ASU is a place that is deeply committed to the students who come here,” Crow said. “We are expecting more students from India than ever, and we are ready and excited to welcome students who are eager to learn and succeed.”

To celebrate its international community and recognize their contributions, ASU hosted an International Student Celebration on May 10, just ahead of its main commencement ceremonies. This event served as a platform to honor the diverse cultural and academic impact of students from around the world, particularly those from India whose presence continues to grow on campus.

ASU’s strong relationship with India is not limited to its current student body. Over the years, the university has built a vast and vibrant network of Indian alumni, now numbering more than 20,000. This extensive alumni base highlights the enduring academic connections ASU has cultivated with India and reflects the long-term impact Indian students have had on the university and beyond.

As ASU continues to expand its international reach, the rising number of Indian students and alumni stands as a testament to the university’s global reputation and inclusive academic environment. The support structures in place, from career development to academic mentoring, play a critical role in helping international students achieve success both during their studies and in their professional lives.

The increasing enrollment of Indian students also reflects broader global trends in international education, where U.S. universities remain among the most sought-after destinations for advanced study. For Indian students in particular, institutions like ASU offer a unique combination of high-quality education, practical training opportunities, and access to cutting-edge research, especially in fields like engineering, computer science, and space technologies.

Omkaar Shenoy’s journey from Kerala to Philadelphia, and Ana Girish’s transition from ASU to an aerospace startup, are just two examples of the opportunities ASU provides to its Indian student community. These success stories highlight how the university not only prepares students academically but also equips them with the skills, confidence, and resources needed to thrive in today’s competitive global job market.

The presence of more than 7,000 Indian students at ASU today, combined with its rapidly expanding alumni network, shows no signs of slowing down. ASU’s leadership remains committed to enhancing this relationship, providing Indian students with a welcoming and supportive academic home in the U.S.

As President Michael Crow remarked during his visit to India, “We are expecting more students from India than ever, and we are ready and excited to welcome students who are eager to learn and succeed.” These words reflect ASU’s broader mission of inclusivity and its dedication to preparing students from around the world to be leaders in their fields.

The university’s efforts to honor international students through events like the International Student Celebration not only acknowledge academic success but also foster a sense of belonging and appreciation for the cultural diversity that enriches campus life. These events serve as a reminder of the essential role international students play in shaping the university’s global identity.

With over 20,000 Indian alumni already making their mark around the world and thousands more currently enrolled, Arizona State University continues to be a beacon for academic excellence and opportunity for Indian students. Whether through groundbreaking work in aerospace, impactful coding contributions, or future innovations, ASU’s Indian graduates are leaving a lasting impression — one that will inspire future generations to follow in their footsteps.

In celebrating this year’s achievements, ASU has once again demonstrated its enduring commitment to empowering students from India and around the globe to reach their full potential and make a meaningful difference in the world.

US Student Visa Cancellations Make Indian Youth Rethink Overseas Education Plans

May 2, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The recent reports of student visa cancellations in the United States have caused anxiety among many Indian students, including Delhi University undergraduate Radhakrishnan, who is now reconsidering his goal of studying in America.

“What I feel is that during my father’s time, it was very lucrative to study in the US. They could get a visa quite easily. But things seem to have gone haywire,” said the 19-year-old.

With his original plans shaken, Radhakrishnan is now setting his sights on enrolling in one of India’s premier management institutions for a master’s degree in business administration. He will only consider going to the US if he fails to secure admission within India.

The sudden revocation of multiple international student visas and the ongoing tensions between the Biden administration and top-tier American universities—some of which are battling over funding issues—have raised alarms among Indian students hoping to study abroad.

India continues to dominate the international student scene in the US, accounting for 29.4 percent of all foreign enrolments for the 2024–25 academic year. It also remains the leading source of international graduate students in America for the second year in a row.

However, many young Indians are now opting to chase their academic and professional dreams within the country. Even those who still choose to study overseas are increasingly planning short-term stays, with the intention of returning soon after graduation.

In recent months, several international students in the US have faced visa cancellations, with some even being instructed to leave voluntarily. The reasons cited range from participating in political demonstrations—especially those supporting Palestinians amid the Israel-Gaza conflict—to minor legal violations such as traffic offenses.

Most students feel powerless to challenge these decisions legally, as the financial burden of litigation is simply too high in addition to their already steep university expenses.

Although many still believe that a US degree offers an edge in the global job market, the tense and unpredictable atmosphere is prompting them to think more carefully about where to pursue their education.

As Indian students expand their options, regions like Europe, Australia, Singapore, and Hong Kong are becoming increasingly attractive. Simultaneously, India’s own top-tier universities are expected to benefit from this shift, according to education experts.

Soumya Shukla, an associate professor at Delhi University, said the current atmosphere in the US is reinforcing a trend she’s observed over the past two to three years.

“Things may not be as rosy in the US as it might seem. Some students who have gone there for studies have later had to pick up unskilled jobs. You don’t get a direct job placement unless you have a qualification from an Ivy League college,” she explained.

The steep cost of studying abroad is another deterrent. Students in India can complete a degree for anywhere between US$200 and US$10,000, while attending a top US university can cost approximately US$50,000 annually—an overwhelming expense for most middle-class Indian families.

The overall demand for higher education within India is booming. According to data from Statista, the number of Indian students enrolled in higher education is projected to more than double, rising from around 40 million in the financial year 2020 to 92 million by 2035.

Nonetheless, students choosing to stay in India must confront the reality that many local colleges are overcrowded, which may compromise educational standards. According to a report by global consultancy EY, few Indian institutions rank among the world’s best, and their academic programs often fail to align with industry needs.

Despite these shortcomings, a growing number of students are optimistic about their prospects in India, especially as the country’s economy remains one of the fastest-growing in the world, promising more job opportunities for well-qualified individuals.

Delhi University student Pratyush Taing, 20, has decided against pursuing his dream of studying at an Ivy League school in the US due to increasing concerns over safety and anti-immigration policies.

“When someone is coming from so far away to study, they want a safe environment,” he said.

Taing also pointed out that India is rapidly expanding its own quality education options, which makes staying in the country more appealing.

This expansion includes international participation. Two years ago, India’s University Grants Commission permitted foreign universities to establish campuses within India. In August of last year, the UK’s University of Southampton became the first to launch an offshore campus in India under the newly introduced national education policy.

Education specialists highlight that prestigious private Indian institutions like Ashoka University and O.P. Jindal Global University have gained a solid reputation for offering world-class education, thereby expanding domestic choices for ambitious students.

Harsh Pant, a professor of international relations at King’s College London, said that universities in Europe, Australia, and Singapore may see an uptick in Indian student applications due to current uncertainty surrounding the US.

However, Pant also emphasized that the US remains a formidable player in global education. “Once things settle down, I do think the diversion from the US will be smaller,” he stated.

One Indian student, who has been accepted into a computer software engineering program in San Jose, California, still intends to go ahead with his plans, despite the recent visa-related controversies.

“I know someone whose visa was cancelled because he participated in a protest. But if you are studying and not taking part in any such activity, then I don’t think it would affect you,” said the student, who wished to remain anonymous.

He also noted that the US continues to offer unmatched opportunities for cutting-edge education and research in the field of technology.

Nonetheless, he plans to return to India after working there for two to three years. His decision is driven by a desire to support his parents and capitalize on India’s rising job market and increasing availability of well-paid roles.

In conclusion, while the United States remains a desirable academic destination due to its advanced educational infrastructure and global prestige, growing concerns about visa security, legal vulnerability, and safety are driving Indian students to reassess their options. With increasing investment in domestic education and the emergence of international campuses in India, students now have broader choices at home and abroad. The shift may not signal a complete departure from the US, but it does reflect a changing mindset shaped by evolving geopolitical and financial realities.

Federal Government Expands Grounds for Deporting International Students, Sparking Legal Battles and Campus Confusion

May 1, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The U.S. federal government has widened the list of reasons international students can lose their legal status, intensifying fears among thousands of foreign students already unsettled by a recent crackdown under the Trump administration. Immigration attorneys argue that these expanded justifications enable swifter deportations and serve to rationalize actions taken earlier this year to revoke many students’ permission to study in the U.S.

Many international students found themselves suddenly stripped of their legal standing, often without warning or explanation. This abrupt shift prompted a wave of legal challenges in federal courts, where several judges issued preliminary rulings asserting that the government had failed to provide due process in revoking the students’ status.

Following these legal challenges, federal officials announced they would draft new guidelines to govern the cancellation of student status. According to a document from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) submitted Monday in court, one of the new permissible reasons is the revocation of the visa students used to enter the United States. This marks a stark change in policy. Previously, students whose visas were revoked could typically remain in the country to complete their studies but would be barred from reentering if they left.

“This just gave them carte blanche to have the State Department revoke a visa and then deport those students, even if they’ve done nothing wrong,” said Brad Banias, an immigration lawyer representing a student affected by the crackdown. His client had a traffic offense on his record, which was included in a law enforcement database accessed by immigration officials.

Banias noted that this new rule significantly broadens ICE’s authority. Prior to this, visa revocation alone was not considered sufficient grounds for terminating a student’s legal presence in the U.S.

Over the past month, foreign students across the country have been shocked to find that their names were deleted from a student-tracking database managed by ICE. Some students went into hiding to avoid being deported, while others chose to return to their home countries, abandoning their academic pursuits.

As legal challenges continued to grow, the government announced on Friday that it would temporarily reinstate the legal status of international students while it worked on formalizing a new policy. That new guidance surfaced in court just days later.

Charles Kuck, an Atlanta-based immigration attorney representing 133 students who lost their status, said the updated policy permits revocations if a student’s name appears in criminal or fingerprint databases in ways previously not allowed. “Basically, they’re trying to cover what they already did bad by making the bad thing that they did now legal for them to do,” said Kuck.

Numerous students affected by these policy changes had only minor legal issues on their records, such as traffic infractions. Others were left completely in the dark about why they had been targeted.

In one legal case, attorneys for the government provided partial clarity during a hearing involving Akshar Patel, a student in Texas pursuing studies in information systems. His status was revoked and later reinstated, prompting him to ask the court to prevent his deportation.

During court proceedings and in official filings, Department of Homeland Security officials disclosed that they had cross-referenced the names of student visa holders with the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), a comprehensive FBI-run database. This system includes details about criminal suspects, missing persons, and individuals who have been arrested—even if charges were never filed or had been dropped.

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes revealed during the hearing that about 6,400 students were flagged in the database sweep. Patel was one of them; he had been charged with reckless driving in 2018, a charge that was ultimately dismissed. That outcome, though, was still logged in the database.

Patel’s name appeared in a list of 734 students compiled in a spreadsheet that was forwarded to a Homeland Security official. Within just 24 hours of receiving it, the official instructed others to “Please terminate all in SEVIS,” referring to the system that tracks international students’ legal status.

Judge Reyes said the rapid response indicated that no individualized review of the records had taken place to determine why the students’ names were in the NCIC. “All of this could have been avoided if someone had taken a beat,” she remarked. Reyes, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, criticized the federal government’s actions, stating it had shown “an utter lack of concern for individuals who have come into this country.”

As ICE was revoking students’ legal status, the U.S. State Department was also canceling some of the visas used by these students to enter the country. Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicated that some of these cancellations were prompted by students’ participation in pro-Palestinian protests, which he claimed threatened U.S. foreign policy interests. However, Rubio admitted in March that certain visa cancellations had “nothing to do with any protests” but were based on “potential criminal activity.”

Rubio explained his rationale to reporters: “My standard: If we knew this information about them before we gave them a visa, would we have allowed them in? If the answer is no, then we revoke the visa.” He further emphasized his stance, declaring, “Your visa is expired, your visa is revoked, you have to leave. There is no right to a student visa.”

The government’s actions caused widespread confusion and panic on college campuses. Universities that discovered their international students had lost legal status were thrown into disarray. In earlier cases, institutions typically updated a student’s legal status only after reporting that they were no longer enrolled. This time, however, the revocations seemed to originate directly from federal authorities.

In some instances, colleges instructed students to immediately cease attending classes or working on campus, warning them they could face deportation if they remained.

Government attorneys later argued that changes in the student database didn’t necessarily equate to a loss of legal status. Although some students were flagged as “failure to maintain status,” officials said the changes were meant as investigative alerts rather than definitive rulings.

Patel’s legal presence in the U.S. was confirmed during the hearing. “He is lawfully present in the U.S.,” stated Andre Watson of the Department of Homeland Security. “He is not subject to immediate detention or removal.”

While Judge Reyes declined to issue a preliminary injunction, she encouraged both legal teams to negotiate a resolution that would ensure Patel could remain in the country.

Universities Urge International Students to Avoid Summer Travel Despite Policy Shift

April 28, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Universities across the United States are continuing to urge international students to avoid traveling abroad this summer, even as the Trump administration announced Friday that it would reinstate the legal status of those whose visas and immigration records had previously been terminated.

Shortly after the announcement, the University of California, Berkeley, emphasized once again that international students face significant risks if they travel overseas, citing the fast-changing nature of immigration policies. “Due to the increased risks involved in re-entering into the United States, we are advising members of the Duke international community to avoid international travel unless essential,” Duke University stated in a recent memo to students and faculty. The university also reminded students that “a valid visa does not guarantee entry to the U.S.”

Concerns have been growing at universities nationwide over the possibility that international students might not be permitted to return to the U.S. if they travel abroad. Despite the Trump administration’s move to restore the legal standing of affected students, immigration experts caution that these changes do not eliminate the dangers associated with international travel.

Jeff Joseph, who is set to become the next president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, stressed that students must remain extremely careful. “Traveling outside of the country can be risky,” Joseph warned, noting that consulting with a lawyer is highly advisable before making any travel plans. He added, “The fact is the Department of State has unilateral authority to revoke visas for any or no reason.”

It remains unclear how many universities have formally advised students against leaving the U.S., but at least five institutions, including UC Berkeley and Duke University, have issued notices this month. These universities have urged their international communities to weigh the potential consequences carefully before deciding to travel.

A recent college graduate from China, now residing in Washington, D.C., shared his own experience and concerns. He explained that he had serious doubts about visiting his home country in December, knowing that then-President-elect Donald Trump had vowed to significantly reduce immigration. “I was worried that I wouldn’t even be allowed back in this country, even though I’m perfectly authorized to work and live here,” said the graduate, who asked to remain anonymous out of fear that speaking publicly could lead to deportation or revocation of his visa.

Faced with this uncertainty, he made the decision to return to the United States before Trump’s inauguration on January 20. His experience highlights the stress and difficult decisions facing many international students, particularly during a period of rapid policy shifts and growing immigration enforcement.

Fanta Aw, the CEO of the Association of International Educators, acknowledged the emotional and practical challenges that international students encounter when deciding whether to visit family members they have not seen in years. “You have to understand what students are going through, and they may want to go home,” Aw said.

In recent weeks, thousands of international students across the country have had their visas revoked by the Trump administration. Officials have justified these actions as necessary to protect American citizens from individuals who might engage in terrorist activities, pose national security threats, or promote extremist ideologies.

However, the administration announced Friday that students would have their legal status reinstated while Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) develops a new “framework” for revoking immigration records in the future. This partial reversal comes after widespread concern and confusion among students, universities, and immigration advocates.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio disclosed last month that the State Department had revoked more than 300 student visas. He described these actions as part of an intensified effort by the White House to crack down on foreign-born students, particularly those accused of political activism.

Yet, many international students who found themselves targeted by these policies insisted that they had not taken part in political demonstrations, including protests related to the Israel-Hamas conflict, nor had they engaged in other activities that could be considered controversial. Despite these students’ peaceful records, their legal status had still come under threat, adding to a climate of fear and uncertainty.

Jeff Joseph emphasized that, under current conditions, it is safer for international students to remain in the United States rather than risk leaving and trying to re-enter. “Stay here, no question,” Joseph advised. He explained that if students travel abroad and find themselves barred from returning, their only option would be to approach the Department of State and attempt to secure a new visa. “But when you’re outside the country, you don’t have the same protections of the courts that you do when inside the country,” he said.

Given the unpredictability of immigration enforcement, universities and immigration attorneys continue to urge extreme caution. The situation leaves many international students grappling with difficult personal choices. While some long to reunite with family members they have not seen for several years, they must also weigh the real risk of being unable to complete their studies or continue living in the U.S.

Although the Trump administration’s announcement offers some relief by promising to reinstate legal status for students who were unfairly penalized, it has not eliminated the underlying uncertainty surrounding immigration policies. The Department of State’s broad authority to revoke visas without detailed justification remains a major concern.

University administrators have reiterated that they will continue to monitor developments closely and provide updates to their international communities. However, they have made it clear that students should remain prepared for sudden changes and continue to exercise extreme caution when considering international travel.

The recent experiences of students like the Washington, D.C.-based graduate illustrate how fraught and emotional these decisions have become. Even students who are fully authorized to live, work, and study in the United States face the fear that bureaucratic changes or sudden policy shifts could abruptly upend their lives.

Ultimately, while Friday’s announcement may provide temporary reassurance to some, the broader uncertainty surrounding immigration policy is unlikely to disappear soon. As a result, universities, immigration attorneys, and advocacy groups will likely continue urging international students to stay in the United States unless travel is absolutely essential.

Trump Administration Restores Legal Status for International Students After Sudden Terminations

April 26, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The Trump administration has decided to reinstate the legal status of international students whose records were abruptly terminated in recent weeks, according to a government attorney during a hearing held on Friday.

Elizabeth D. Kurlan, representing the Justice Department, stated during a hearing at the Northern District of California in Oakland that the records for international students would be temporarily reactivated. She explained that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is currently working on developing a new policy that will “provide a framework for status record termination.”

This decision follows weeks of controversy after the Trump administration began revoking not only the visas of thousands of international students but also their records and legal standing in the United States. These actions appeared to specifically target individuals involved in political activism or those who had past infractions, such as DUI charges.

During the hearing, Kurlan clarified, “ICE still maintains the authority to terminate a SEVIS record for other reasons, such as if a student fails to maintain his or her nonimmigrant status after the record is reactivated, or engages in other unlawful activity that would render him or her removable from the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act.” Here, she referred to SEVIS, the Student and Exchange Visitor Program.

Additionally, Kurlan indicated that moving forward, ICE would no longer terminate a student’s legal status based solely on information found in the National Crime Information Center. This index, which contains criminal history details, had been a major factor in the recent terminations of SEVIS records.

Across the United States, many international students whose legal statuses had been terminated suddenly found that their records were reinstated starting Thursday afternoon. According to immigration attorneys and various universities, the reinstatements occurred with little to no formal explanation from authorities.

Jath Shao, an immigration attorney based in Cleveland, described the abrupt changes by saying, “It’s like somebody flipped a light switch on.” He mentioned that one of his clients was among those who experienced the sudden reversal.

Although many students saw their records restored, the changes have not impacted every affected student. For example, at the University of California, Berkeley, Janet Gilmore, a university spokesperson, reported that twelve out of twenty-three international students whose SEVIS records had been terminated in previous weeks were reinstated.

Similarly, Carl Langsenkamp, the public information director at the Rochester Institute of Technology, noted that some students there had their records reinstated. In Atlanta, immigration attorney Charles Kuck said that approximately a dozen of his clients also reported a reversal in their status.

David Wilson, an attorney representing about twenty students in Minnesota, observed that roughly half of his clients had their statuses restored. Despite the progress, Wilson emphasized that significant uncertainty remains. He pointed out that while many students had their SEVIS records reactivated, their visas remain revoked, creating a complicated situation.

“That means they’re kind of trapped in the country. So that’ll be the next phase of seeking clarity as to what the government’s actually doing,” Wilson said.

Immigration attorneys also warned that even with the reinstatement of SEVIS records, the previous termination still shows up on students’ histories. This could negatively impact future applications for green cards, employment authorization, or other immigration benefits.

Elora Mukherjee, who serves as director of the Immigrants’ Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School, stated, “The time that they had their SEVIS status terminated could still have harmful effects for those students.” Mukherjee stressed that restoring records alone would not resolve the full scope of damage inflicted by the terminations. She added, “So it’s not enough for the federal government to simply restore service records. The government would need to somehow make the students whole.”

Attorney Jath Shao expressed cautious optimism about the recent developments. While he acknowledged that reactivating SEVIS records was a positive step, he stressed that more comprehensive actions were necessary to fully protect international students.

“By now it’s obvious that the Trump administration spent the four years of Biden plotting their revenge on the immigration system,” Shao said. He referred to what he perceives as the Trump administration’s long-standing effort to create obstacles for immigrants, even before President Biden took office. Shao continued, “But once some brave students and lawyers went to the courts — the administration’s defenders were unable or unwilling to explain the rationale.”

The sudden reinstatement of records, while welcomed by many, has not entirely erased the anxiety and confusion faced by affected students. Without clear communication from ICE and with visa revocations still hanging over many of them, international students remain in a vulnerable legal limbo. Moving forward, both students and their attorneys plan to seek further clarity and advocate for permanent solutions to secure their clients’ futures in the United States.

The Trump administration’s handling of international students’ records, and the subsequent reversal, has sparked widespread criticism from universities, legal advocates, and immigrant rights groups. Many view the situation as part of a broader pattern of unpredictable immigration enforcement actions that have marked the last few years.

In the meantime, attorneys are advising affected students to maintain strict compliance with all immigration regulations while waiting for official guidance from ICE on the next steps. Universities, too, are monitoring the situation closely and providing support to students whose educational and professional futures remain uncertain.

Although the reinstatement of SEVIS records represents a significant shift from the administration’s earlier aggressive stance, experts caution that it may take considerable time before the full implications of the terminations and reinstatements are understood. Until then, the impacted students continue to live with the ongoing challenges brought about by these sudden changes.

Harvard Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Funding Freeze and Alleged First Amendment Violations

April 23, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Harvard University has launched a legal battle against the Trump administration after the federal government froze billions of dollars in funding allocated to the Ivy League institution. The lawsuit, filed on Monday, is a major development in an ongoing standoff between Harvard and President Donald Trump’s administration, rooted in disputes over university policies on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), admissions, and faculty hiring.

The decision to sue the government comes after Harvard refused to comply with directives to dismantle its DEI programs and make substantial changes to its academic and administrative policies. The university contends that the Trump administration retaliated by cutting off funding, threatening its tax-exempt status, and targeting its ability to enroll international students.

“Moments ago, we filed a lawsuit to halt the funding freeze because it is unlawful and beyond the government’s authority,” Harvard President Alan Garber announced Monday. The lawsuit, filed in a Massachusetts district court, asserts that the government’s actions violate the First Amendment and asks the court to block further punitive measures, rule the administration’s demands unconstitutional, and restore the university’s funding.

According to the legal complaint, “The Government wielded the threat of withholding federal funds in an attempt to coerce Harvard to conform with the Government’s preferred mix of viewpoints and ideologies.” Harvard argues that the funding freeze constitutes an abuse of federal power and is an unlawful attempt to force ideological conformity within academic institutions.

The filing also references similar funding freezes at other elite universities, stating that such actions have occurred without sufficient justification or explanation. “To date, the Government has — with little warning and even less explanation — slashed billions of dollars in federal funding to universities across America, including Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Princeton, the University of Pennsylvania, and Northwestern,” the lawsuit reads. These sudden financial penalties have left affected institutions in the dark about the specific reasons behind the government’s decisions.

While the Trump administration has defended its actions by citing a lack of progress on fighting antisemitism on campus, Harvard argues that the issue is being used as a pretext to impose sweeping and unrelated changes to university governance and policy. The university maintains that it is actively working to combat antisemitism, but it says the demands imposed by the administration go well beyond that concern.

“All told, the tradeoff put to Harvard and other universities is clear: Allow the Government to micromanage your academic institution or jeopardize the institution’s ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions,” the lawsuit states. Harvard warns that acquiescing to the administration’s demands would undermine the independence and mission of academic research institutions nationwide.

The Hill has contacted the White House for a statement in response to the lawsuit but has not yet received a reply.

President Trump, however, has been vocal on social media, launching personal attacks on the university and its leadership. “Harvard is a JOKE, teaches Hate and Stupidity, and should not longer receive Federal Funds,” he posted last week. In his comments, Trump criticized the university’s senior officials, claiming they have “ridiculously high salaries” and labeling them as some of the “WORST and MOST INCOMPETENT” administrators in higher education.

“Leftist dopes,” Trump added, “are teaching at Harvard, and because of that, Harvard can no longer be considered even a decent place of learning, and should not be considered on any list of the World’s Great Universities or Colleges.”

In a message to the Harvard community, President Garber highlighted the far-reaching consequences of the funding freeze. He emphasized that critical research projects with significant public health implications are at risk due to the government’s actions. “Research that the government has put in jeopardy includes efforts to improve the prospects of children who survive cancer, to understand at the molecular level how cancer spreads throughout the body, to predict the spread of infectious disease outbreaks, and to ease the pain of soldiers wounded on the battlefield,” Garber explained.

He continued by warning that emerging breakthroughs in treating chronic illnesses could also be stifled. “As opportunities to reduce the risk of multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease are on the horizon, the government is slamming on the brakes,” he said. According to Garber, the real victims of the government’s decision will be “future patients and their loved ones who will suffer the heartbreak of illnesses that might have been prevented or treated more effectively.”

The case is expected to draw the attention and possibly the support of other academic institutions, many of which have faced similar federal scrutiny under the Trump administration. Harvard’s willingness to confront the government in court may be viewed as a potential turning point for universities feeling pressure to conform to political demands in exchange for federal funding.

As the legal challenge unfolds, the outcome could have significant implications not only for Harvard’s autonomy but for academic freedom and the financial stability of higher education institutions across the country. The lawsuit seeks not only to restore Harvard’s funding but to establish legal boundaries on how far a federal administration can go in influencing university policy and practices through financial leverage.

By taking a firm legal stance, Harvard is signaling that it intends to defend its principles and research mission against what it sees as unconstitutional overreach. The university’s leadership believes that upholding academic freedom and resisting political coercion is essential to the pursuit of knowledge and the integrity of higher education.

With the lawsuit now moving forward in the courts, all eyes will be on how the judicial system responds to a high-profile conflict between one of the nation’s most prestigious universities and a president who continues to wield significant influence. The final ruling could shape the future of the relationship between universities and the federal government, particularly in terms of funding, free speech, and institutional independence.

India Assists Students Facing U.S. Visa Issues as Bilateral Engagement Deepens

April 18, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) announced on April 17 that its diplomatic missions in the United States are actively engaging with Indian students affected by recent revocations of F-1 visas, offering them support and guidance. This development comes as multiple Indian nationals studying in the U.S. have been informed by American authorities about concerns regarding their visa status.

“We are aware that several Indian students have received communication from the U.S. government regarding their F-1 visa status, which happens to be the student visa. We are looking into the matter,” MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said during the ministry’s weekly press conference.

He further added, “Our Embassy and Consulates are in touch with the students to provide support.” This statement represents a notable evolution in the MEA’s stance. Until recently, the ministry primarily focused on advising Indian citizens abroad to adhere to local laws, rather than directly intervening in immigration matters. However, with growing concerns surrounding the nature of some of these visa revocations, Indian authorities have stepped in to play a more proactive role.

The statement marks a shift from the MEA’s earlier position that primarily advised Indian nationals to comply with local laws. The Trump administration’s immigration enforcement has led to dozens of Indian students receiving notices, with some reportedly linked to protest activity or minor infractions such as traffic violations.

Among those affected is Chinmay Deore, a final-year student at Wayne State University in Michigan. Deore, along with three other international students, has submitted a formal appeal to U.S. authorities, requesting that their F-1 visa status be reinstated. The students are receiving assistance from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in pursuing legal recourse. Deore and his fellow students have maintained that none of them face any criminal charges, despite the visa cancellations.

Although the MEA has not specifically mentioned Deore’s case in its communications, it has indicated that legal support is being advised as the primary route for affected individuals. “Our Embassy and Consulates are in touch with the students to provide support,” reiterated Jaiswal, emphasizing the ministry’s growing role in helping students navigate the fallout.

In a related case earlier this week, a Wisconsin court issued a stay on the deportation order against Krish Isserdasani, an Indian student enrolled at the University of Madison-Wisconsin. The court ruling has provided temporary relief and may set a precedent for other students facing similar legal challenges.

At the same time, recent data released by U.S. authorities has highlighted a sharp decline in the number of student visas issued to Indian nationals. In February 2025, the number of F-1 visas granted at American diplomatic missions in India fell by nearly 30 percent compared to the same month the previous year. This decline raises concerns over the broader implications for educational and people-to-people ties between the two countries.

As these immigration challenges unfold, bilateral diplomatic engagement remains active. The MEA also addressed questions about the upcoming official visit of U.S. Vice President JD Vance to India. During this visit, Vance is expected to meet with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and other top Indian leaders.

“With the United States of America, we have a Comprehensive Strategic Global Partnership. So, when you have that level of partnership with any country, obviously you will discuss all relevant issues,” Jaiswal told reporters. He noted that discussions during the visit are likely to cover a wide range of topics, including bilateral cooperation, regional matters, and Indo-Pacific security.

New Delhi is optimistic that the Vice President’s visit will contribute positively to strengthening the already close ties between India and the United States. Both countries have been working on multiple fronts, from defense and technology collaborations to strategic alignment in the Indo-Pacific. Vance’s trip is expected to reinforce these initiatives and address emerging concerns such as student mobility, immigration policy, and cross-border education.

India has long viewed education as a cornerstone of its relationship with the United States. Each year, tens of thousands of Indian students pursue higher education in American universities, contributing to academic research, economic growth, and innovation. The recent visa issues, however, have cast a shadow over these traditionally robust exchanges. Indian authorities are therefore keen to resolve the situation promptly and diplomatically, hoping to maintain the positive trajectory of educational cooperation.

The MEA’s active involvement in the cases of affected students signals a broader policy approach where the Indian government is willing to step in when citizens abroad face difficulties, especially in contexts that involve perceived administrative overreach or legal ambiguity. The support extended to students is likely to be welcomed by the Indian diaspora and educational community, both of which have been expressing concern over the sudden visa actions.

While the final outcomes of the ongoing legal cases remain to be seen, Indian officials have reaffirmed their commitment to safeguarding the interests of students abroad. With U.S. Vice President JD Vance’s visit on the horizon, there is an opportunity for both countries to address the visa concerns within the broader framework of their strategic partnership.

The MEA, meanwhile, continues to monitor the situation closely and remains engaged with U.S. authorities. “Our Embassy and Consulates are in touch with the students to provide support,” Jaiswal emphasized once again, underscoring that India will remain involved as the cases proceed.

At a time when global mobility and international education are facing unprecedented challenges, both governments may need to collaborate more closely to ensure that legitimate students are not caught in the crossfire of policy enforcement or political shifts. India is expected to raise these issues during the upcoming diplomatic engagements, seeking clarity and fairness in visa processes while reaffirming its commitment to international norms and mutual respect.

As Indian students await clarity and legal resolutions, the outcome of these efforts will likely influence not just current visa applicants but the broader landscape of U.S.-India educational ties for years to come.

Indian Students in U.S. Face Visa Revocations, Deportation Threats, and Legal Battles

April 18, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has acknowledged that a number of Indian students in the United States have received notices from the U.S. government about their F-1 visa status. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal addressed the issue during a press conference in New Delhi, stating that the Indian embassy and consulates are actively engaged with the affected students.

“We are aware that several Indian students have received communication from the US government regarding their F-1 visa status. We are looking into the matter. Our Embassy and consulate are in touch with the students,” said Jaiswal.

The situation has sparked legal action from some international students. Chinmay Deore, an Indian student in the U.S., joined three other foreign nationals in filing a lawsuit on Friday against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and immigration officials. The lawsuit, reported by PTI, claims that their immigration status was unfairly and unlawfully terminated.

Deore filed the case alongside Xiangyun Bu and Qiuyi Yang from China and Yogesh Joshi from Nepal. All four are students at public universities in Michigan. According to their legal petition, their student status in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) was terminated without proper notice or explanation. The lawsuit emphasizes that this termination was both abrupt and illegal, putting them at risk of deportation despite having valid student credentials.

The impact of these federal actions has been significant, placing hundreds of international students in a precarious legal position. According to an investigation by the Associated Press that reviewed statements from universities and officials, at least 901 students from 128 educational institutions have seen their visas revoked or their immigration status terminated since mid-March. These institutions include a mix of prestigious private universities like Harvard and Stanford, major public schools such as the University of Maryland and Ohio State University, and smaller liberal arts colleges.

In one notable case, a U.S. federal judge intervened to temporarily halt the deportation of Krish Lal Isserdasani, a 21-year-old Indian undergraduate student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Isserdasani, who has held an F-1 visa since 2021, is in his final semester pursuing a degree in computer engineering.

According to court filings, “having maintained full-time enrollment and good academic standing, Isserdasani is now in the final semester of his senior year with less than 30 days remaining until an expected graduation on May 10, 2025.” The documents also noted that Isserdasani received no prior communication from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, his university, or the State Department about any changes to his visa status. His deportation, if carried out, would have prevented him from completing his degree and applying for Optional Practical Training (OPT), a post-study work program permitted under the F-1 visa rules.

The growing number of deportations is concerning. Since January, the United States has deported 682 Indians. Although many of these individuals entered the country unlawfully, there has also been a noticeable trend of student visa revocations. Some of these revocations are reportedly linked to student involvement in political protests, particularly those related to the Israel-Palestine conflict.

In many cases, students were informed via email by their school’s Designated School Officials (DSOs) that their records in SEVIS had been terminated. This cancellation invalidated their Form I-20, Employment Authorization Document (EAD), and legal student status in the U.S. The reasons cited for visa revocation ranged from relatively minor infractions like traffic violations—including speeding, driving without a licensed supervisor while on a learner’s permit, and failing to stop at a red light—to more serious but previously resolved issues such as shoplifting and alcohol-related offenses.

There have also been instances where students opted to self-deport after losing their visa status. One such case involves Ranjani Srinivasan, an Indian scholar who left the U.S. in March 2025. According to the Department of Homeland Security, Srinivasan self-deported after participating in a pro-Palestinian demonstration at Columbia University.

Another high-profile incident involved Badar Khan Suri, an Indian researcher in conflict studies at Georgetown University. He was detained on March 17 following allegations of antisemitic speech and alleged links to Hamas. Suri, however, refuted the accusations and claimed he was being targeted due to his wife’s Palestinian heritage. He is currently being held at an immigration detention center in Louisiana.

The U.S. government has recently intensified its scrutiny of international students, especially those involved in campus activism. The Department of State (DOS) has been asking students to self-deport, citing concerns over their political engagement. The crackdown is partly driven by social media reviews conducted by the DOS, which now extend to new visa applicants as well.

Even individuals applying for F (academic study), M (vocational training), or J (exchange visitor) visas may be affected by this social media screening. Based on their online activity, applicants can be denied a visa or asked to leave the country.

Understanding the student visa process is key to grasping the implications of these developments. To obtain a U.S. student visa—commonly an F-1 visa—students must first gain admission to a recognized school or university in the country. Following that, they must undergo an application and interview process at a U.S. embassy or consulate in their home country.

A major requirement for the F-1 visa is proof of adequate financial support to cover the costs of education and living expenses. While enrolled, students must maintain full-time academic status and typically face restrictions on off-campus employment. Although the State Department manages entry visas, the Student and Exchange Visitor Program, under the DHS, oversees the students’ legal status after they arrive in the U.S.

The current wave of visa revocations, student lawsuits, and legal interventions underscores a growing unease among international students in the United States. As the U.S. tightens its immigration oversight—especially for those participating in political expression—the future remains uncertain for hundreds of students caught in the crossfire of policy enforcement and academic aspiration.

Indian Student Visa Approvals Drop Sharply Across Canada, US, and UK for the First Time in Four Years

April 17, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

For the first time in four years, there has been a simultaneous decline in the number of Indian students receiving study visas to Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom, according to a detailed analysis of newly released visa statistics by The Indian Express.

The 2024 data reveals a notable decrease of at least 25% in the number of Indian students obtaining study permits across these top three education destinations. Canada experienced a significant 32% fall, with visa approvals dropping from 2.78 lakh in 2023 to 1.89 lakh in 2024, as reported by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC). The United States registered an even steeper decline of 34%, with F1 student visas reducing from 1,31,000 in fiscal year 2023 to just 86,110 in 2024. Meanwhile, the UK recorded a 26% drop, with sponsored student visas granted to Indian nationals falling from 1,20,000 to 88,732, based on UK Home Office data.

This downward trend follows the introduction of stricter immigration rules, particularly by Canada and the UK, which have imposed limitations on student intake and dependent visas. These measures are largely seen as responses to growing concerns over housing shortages and the strain that large international student populations are placing on public services in these countries.

Canada, in particular, has enacted several major changes affecting Indian students. Among the most impactful is the cancellation of the Student Direct Stream program, which had previously fast-tracked applications. In addition, the Canadian government has introduced a cap on the number of study permits issued, resulting in a 35% drop in 2024 alone. It has also set a goal of reducing temporary residents to just 5% of the national population by 2026. Another 10% cut to study permit allocations has already been announced for 2025. These policy changes are being justified by officials as necessary to alleviate growing pressure on housing, healthcare, and other public systems.

Reflecting the consequences of these policies, the number of Indian students receiving study permits in Canada declined by 32% — from 2.78 lakh in 2023 to 1.89 lakh in 2024. In contrast, the decline in Chinese student permits was far less severe, dipping only slightly from 58,080 in 2023 to 56,465 in 2024 — a decrease of just 3%.

The UK has also rolled out new visa rules in 2024, with a strong focus on limiting foreign students from bringing family members. The UK Home Office acknowledged that the policy change may have “partly impacted the number of main applicant visas granted.”

Unlike the United States and Canada, where Indian student numbers were climbing until 2023, the UK had already experienced a drop in Indian student visa grants beginning in 2023. That year saw a 13% decline, with the number falling from 1,38,980 to 1,19,738. This was followed by a sharper 26% decrease in 2024.

The current decline marks a dramatic reversal from the decade-long boom in Indian student enrollments in these countries. Over the past ten years, Indian students had experienced substantial increases in visa approvals and had even surpassed their Chinese counterparts in all three destinations.

Canada had emerged as the leading choice for Indian students, with the number of visas granted rising from just 31,920 in 2015 to 2,78,160 in 2023 — nearly an eightfold increase. The UK saw an even steeper surge, with Indian student visa approvals rising more than tenfold — from 10,418 in 2015 to 1,19,738 in 2023. Meanwhile, the US saw its number of F1 visas issued to Indian students almost double, from 74,831 in fiscal 2015 to 1,30,730 in 2023.

This trend enabled Indian students to overtake their Chinese counterparts in all three nations. Even in 2024, despite the fall in total numbers, Indian students continued to outnumber Chinese students in both Canada and the United States. In the UK, Indians held the lead in 2022 and 2023, but their numbers dropped below the Chinese cohort again in 2024.

There are also distinct patterns in the academic preferences and enrollment trends of Indian students across these three countries. In Canada, a majority of Indian students tend to pursue college-level programs that offer shorter, employment-focused diplomas and certificate courses instead of traditional university degrees. In 2023, undergraduate programs slightly edged out postgraduate ones at Canadian universities, with about 16,000 study permits issued for bachelor’s programs, compared to roughly 15,640 for master’s degrees.

In the United States, the academic landscape for Indian students has changed over the years. Data from the Open Doors report shows that while engineering remained the most popular subject until the 2017–18 academic year, mathematics and computer science have since become the top fields of interest. In the most recent data, 37.5% of Indian students were pursuing studies in math and computer science, compared to 35.4% in engineering. Indian students in the US have consistently leaned toward postgraduate studies more than undergraduate education.

The UK reflects similar patterns. A large portion of Indian students in the UK pursue postgraduate degrees, with the UK Home Office noting that “four out of five Indian students — or 80% — were enrolled at the master’s level.” This postgraduate preference has intensified over time. According to the Higher Education Statistics Agency, the share of Indian undergraduates in the UK has significantly dropped — from around 50% in 2014 to just 20% in 2024.

In summary, the steep fall in Indian student visa approvals in 2024 across Canada, the US, and the UK ends a decade of consistent growth and signals a major shift in global education mobility trends. The tightening of immigration policies, especially in Canada and the UK, appears to be the central reason behind the decline. While Chinese student numbers have largely remained stable, Indian students have been disproportionately affected by these changes. Whether this trend continues in the coming years will likely depend on how these destination countries balance their policy goals with the demand for international education and talent.

Harvard Refuses Federal Demands Despite Threat to Billions in Research Funding

April 15, 2025April 17, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Harvard University has announced it will not comply with new requirements from the Trump administration, even though the decision could cost the school billions in federal grants and contracts used for research in vital scientific and medical fields. Harvard President Alan M. Garber declared the university’s position in a strongly worded letter sent to the campus community on Monday, emphasizing that government overreach threatens academic independence and violates constitutional principles.

Garber made it clear that the university would not accept a proposed agreement from the federal government, which he says imposes regulations on academic freedom and the ideological orientation of Harvard’s faculty, staff, and students. “No government… should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and areas of study and inquiry they can pursue,” Garber stated in his letter.

For more than 75 years, Garber said, the U.S. government has partnered with universities like Harvard by awarding grants and contracts to help finance innovative research in various disciplines. This collaboration, combined with internal university investment, has produced groundbreaking advancements in medicine, engineering, and science. “These innovations have made countless people in our country and throughout the world healthier and safer,” he noted.

However, Garber said that in recent weeks, the government has been threatening to withdraw funding from several academic institutions, including Harvard, accusing them of allowing antisemitism to flourish on campus. He called these partnerships “among the most productive and beneficial in American history.”

Garber highlighted the type of research at risk, citing Harvard’s contributions to developing treatments for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes, along with major progress in artificial intelligence, quantum science, and engineering. He warned that cutting off support would endanger the health of millions and jeopardize national economic and technological strength. “The federal government was risking not just the health and well-being of millions of individuals by retreating from partnerships with Harvard and other universities, but also the economic security and vitality of the country,” he said.

Late last week, the Trump administration issued a revised and expanded list of conditions that Harvard must fulfill to preserve its financial relationship with the federal government. According to Garber, the new list made it clear that the goal was not genuine cooperation to fight antisemitism but rather to control the university’s academic environment. “Although some of the demands outlined by the government are aimed at combating antisemitism, the majority represent direct governmental regulation of the ‘intellectual conditions’ at Harvard,” Garber wrote.

Among the new demands, the administration has asked the university to audit the beliefs and opinions of its student body, staff, and faculty. Additionally, it called for Harvard to reduce the influence of individuals who hold certain ideological positions. Garber found such requests unacceptable and said Harvard had informed the administration through legal counsel that it would not comply.

“We have informed the administration through our legal counsel that we will not accept their proposed agreement,” he declared. “The University will not negotiate over its independence or its constitutional rights.” He further stated that the administration’s demands “go beyond the power of the federal government,” violate First Amendment rights, and surpass the legal authority allowed under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

Garber emphasized that Harvard remains committed to combating antisemitism but will do so on its own terms and in a way that upholds its institutional values. He acknowledged the university’s moral responsibility in addressing antisemitism and said the administration’s tactics do not help meet that responsibility. “The administration’s prescription… threatens our values as a private institution devoted to the pursuit, production, and dissemination of knowledge,” he said.

He noted that over the past 15 months, Harvard has implemented various initiatives to address antisemitism on campus and that further actions are planned. Garber stressed the university’s commitment to promoting an environment of open debate and intellectual diversity. This includes respecting freedom of expression and peaceful protest, as long as it does not disrupt academic life. He also expressed a desire to foster a welcoming campus culture that embraces differing perspectives.

“We will continue to nurture a thriving culture of open inquiry on campus and broaden the intellectual and viewpoint diversity within the community,” Garber said. “The university will respect free speech and dissent while also ensuring protest occurs in a time, place and manner that does not interfere with teaching, learning and research.” He added that Harvard would seek legal and appropriate ways to build a community that “exemplifies, respects and embraces differences.”

Garber argued that the responsibility for addressing institutional shortcomings lies within the university, not with federal authorities. “These ends will not be achieved by assertions of power, unmoored from the law, to control teaching and learning at Harvard and to dictate how we operate,” he said. “The work of addressing our shortcomings, fulfilling our commitments, and embodying our values is ours to define and undertake as a community.”

He concluded his message by reaffirming Harvard’s belief in academic freedom and the university’s role in advancing society through independent research and education. “Freedom of thought and inquiry, along with the government’s longstanding commitment to respect and protect it, has enabled universities to contribute in vital ways to a free society and to healthier, more prosperous lives for people everywhere,” Garber wrote. “We proceed now, as always, with the conviction that the fearless and unfettered pursuit of truth liberates humanity—and with faith in the enduring promise that America’s colleges and universities hold for our country and our world.”

The standoff with Harvard comes as the Trump administration escalates its crackdown on antisemitism in higher education. Since October 2023, the administration has suspended federal funding to nearly every Ivy League school, except the University of Pennsylvania and Dartmouth, due to ongoing investigations into anti-Israel demonstrations on campus.

Columbia University was the first to lose federal support, with more than $400 million in funding withdrawn after it was determined that Jewish students did not feel safe on campus. Columbia later complied with administration demands in hopes of having its funding restored.

Earlier this month, a federal task force on antisemitism began reviewing Harvard’s nearly $9 billion in federal grants and contracts as part of an ongoing investigation into how the university has handled antisemitism on campus.

The Trump administration has committed to taking a more aggressive approach to addressing campus antisemitism, criticizing President Joe Biden for what it sees as leniency toward violent campus protests. In addition, the administration has taken steps to identify, detain, and deport foreign students who have been involved in organizing or participating in anti-Israel protests at U.S. universities.

Trump Administration Revokes Visas of Hundreds of International Students, Prompting Backlash and Legal Battles

April 10, 2025April 14, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The Trump administration has taken a controversial step by revoking the visas of hundreds of international students and detaining around a dozen individuals on college campuses across the United States, often without prior notice or the ability to appeal. This sweeping action has triggered widespread concern and unease among the international student community.

Viral videos have captured the moments when plain-clothes officers handcuffed and arrested students near their homes, shocking viewers and sparking fear among students nationwide. The situation has escalated to the point where over 80 universities have reported cases of revoked student visas, as documented by a tracker maintained by Inside Higher Ed. These reports span institutions from coast to coast, impacting students and faculty alike.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed last month that over 300 visas have already been revoked. He explained the department’s stance by saying it was targeting individuals whose actions were seen as being contrary to U.S. national interests. “It might be more” than 300 visas, Rubio noted, hinting at the broader scope of the effort. “I don’t know actually if it’s primarily student visas. It’s a combination of visas,” he said.

A significant number of the students affected had participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, though some cases involved individuals with prior legal issues. These infractions ranged from criminal records to minor offenses such as speeding or a previous DUI, according to immigration attorneys familiar with the cases. For instance, CBS News reported on a Turkish student from the University of Minnesota who was detained in March after his visa was revoked due to a prior drunk driving offense.

Despite the legal infractions in some cases, immigration experts emphasize that students on visas are entitled to First Amendment rights, including freedom of speech. Deportations over political expression have historically been rare, but the temporary nature of student visas makes these individuals more vulnerable.

Many students have filed lawsuits against the federal government, arguing that their visas were suddenly revoked without any warning or an avenue for appeal or correction. Rubio has justified the government’s position by stating that student visas are intended for education, and that they will be revoked if foreign students are perceived to be engaging in actions that could “destabilize” the country.

Students and advocates have questioned the legality and fairness of these measures. “No president should be allowed to set an ideological litmus test and exclude or remove people from our country who they disagree with,” the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) stated in a public response. The White House, meanwhile, has defended its actions by invoking a 1952 law that gives the Secretary of State broad authority to expel foreigners who might pose “potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences” for the U.S.

The crackdown has touched a wide range of educational institutions. Inside Higher Ed has listed more than 80 universities where international students or recent graduates have experienced changes to their legal status. These include large public universities such as Texas A&M University, University of Florida, University of Oregon, and University of Colorado, as well as elite private institutions like Harvard University, Yale University, Stanford University, Columbia University, and Dartmouth College.

Specific numbers reveal the scale of the action. At least eight students from Arizona State University and six individuals from the University of California, Berkeley have had their visas revoked, according to the Washington Post. The Wall Street Journal reports that 57 visas were withdrawn across the entire University of California system, and another seven from Ohio State University. In total, the U.S. is home to approximately 1.1 million international student visa holders.

Beyond the revocation of visas, several students and faculty have been detained, including individuals who hold permanent legal residency in the U.S. After being taken into custody, they are sent to detention centers while awaiting deportation proceedings.

Video evidence has shown plain-clothes Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers apprehending startled and distressed students, often placing them into unmarked vehicles. Some of those detained claim they were never given a reason for their arrest and maintain that they committed no crime.

One of the most high-profile cases is that of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate and legal permanent resident. He was arrested in his university-owned home in March. Another prominent case involves Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish national and student at Tufts University. In widely circulated footage, she is seen trembling with fear while being surrounded by six plain-clothes ICE agents wearing masks. She was intercepted while on her way to a Ramadan celebration.

Another case that drew attention was the deportation of Rasha Alawieh, a professor at Brown University and a kidney transplant specialist. U.S. officials claimed they found “photos and videos” on her phone that expressed sympathies toward Hezbollah.

Some students who faced the revocation of their visas have fled to Canada to avoid deportation. These include Momodou Taal and Ranjani Srinivasan, both of whom were reportedly affected by the visa cancellations.

The situation has prompted legal challenges from students and civil rights organizations. Several lawsuits have been filed against the federal government, accusing it of detaining individuals without explanation or legal basis—potentially violating their civil rights. The legal efforts aim to delay or block deportations and seek redress for what plaintiffs say are unjust and unlawful actions.

One of the key legal battles involves Xiaotian Liu, a 26-year-old doctoral student from China studying at Dartmouth College. Liu is suing the government with the support of the ACLU of New Hampshire. The lawsuit claims his visa was revoked “without any notice and sufficient explanation.” According to court filings, Liu has not committed any crimes nor has he participated in any protests.

As the number of affected students continues to grow, so does the concern among academic institutions and human rights groups. Faculty members across the country have raised alarms about the implications this crackdown could have on academic freedom and the right of students to engage in political discourse.

The Trump administration’s actions have reignited debates about immigration policy, free speech, and the rights of non-citizens within U.S. borders. With lawsuits moving forward and public outcry building, the future remains uncertain for many international students who had come to the U.S. to study—only to find themselves facing detention, deportation, or the sudden loss of legal status.

US Bill Threatens to Eliminate OPT, Raising Alarm Among International Students

April 9, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

A newly proposed bill in the US Congress is creating widespread anxiety among global student communities, as it seeks to eliminate the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program. The OPT provision allows international students in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields to stay in the US for up to three years post-graduation while gaining work experience.

If enacted, this legislation could abruptly cut off a critical link between academic achievement and professional development, severely impacting the higher education system and tech sector in the United States.

Understanding OPT and Its Importance

The OPT program offers temporary employment authorization to international students holding F-1 visas, enabling them to work in the US for one year following graduation. For students in STEM disciplines, there is an additional 24-month extension available, allowing a total of three years of practical training in the US.

This timeframe plays a pivotal role in helping international students:

Gain essential work experience in the US job market

Manage and begin repayment of education loans

Pursue long-term employment through H-1B visa sponsorship

Once their OPT period concludes, students who haven’t secured another visa status such as the H-1B are required to exit the US. The OPT period thus serves as both a professional stepping stone and a legal cushion for recent graduates.

Implications Beyond Indian Students

Although Indian nationals make up the largest segment of the international student population in the US—over 300,000 during the 2023–24 academic year, according to Open Doors 2024—the consequences of this bill would extend to all international students with F-1 and M-1 visas.

Students from China, South Korea, Brazil, Nigeria, and other countries, particularly those pursuing STEM degrees, depend on the OPT period to launch their careers in the US and repay their often substantial student loans. A sudden end to the program could disrupt countless academic and career trajectories.

The Growing Alarm Over the Bill

While this isn’t the first attempt to reduce or eliminate OPT, the timing and political context have heightened anxieties. The bill appears in the midst of a rising anti-immigration sentiment in the US, especially with the upcoming elections driving a more hardline approach.

Recent developments exacerbating these concerns include:

Increased deportations and more intense scrutiny of student visas

F-1 visa holders rushing to find employment that offers H-1B sponsorship

Students postponing or cancelling international travel due to fears of re-entry issues

Even elite institutions such as Yale, Columbia, and Cornell have reportedly advised students to avoid traveling abroad during the summer, fearing complications upon return.

Effects on Mental Wellbeing, Career Paths, and Loan Repayment

This uncertainty is dramatically changing conversations on university campuses. Where students once discussed topics like coding boot camps and summer internships, they are now flocking to immigration information sessions and legal Q&A forums.

The most immediate and profound impact is the potential loss of access to the US job market during a crucial early-career period. Many international students rely on the OPT years to:

Gain professional exposure

Strengthen their resumes

Earn income that helps offset tuition costs, which can exceed $60,000 annually

Losing OPT would force many students to leave the US right after graduation, throwing their career plans into disarray and making student loan repayment far more difficult.

Could This Redirect Students to Other Countries?

The United States has long held a reputation as the preferred destination for international students, but that dominance could face serious challenges if the OPT program is removed.

There’s already evidence of shifting interest, with a 20 percent increase in applications to other destinations such as Canada, the UK, and countries across Europe. Many parents are now actively asking educational counselors about alternatives that offer more reliable post-graduation work rights.

Countries like Canada, which offers a generous Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP), and Germany, known for its Blue Card pathway, are becoming increasingly appealing for students who want both world-class education and viable career options afterward.

Support From Universities and Employers

Recognizing the threat posed by the potential elimination of OPT, US universities are taking proactive steps to support their international student communities. These include:

Organizing campus sessions with immigration attorneys

Establishing networks of support and guidance

Helping students accelerate their applications for the H-1B visa

On the employer side, many tech companies are openly voicing support for OPT. These firms not only benefit from the reduced costs of hiring international students on temporary work authorization but also value the global talent and expertise they bring.

Advice for Students in the Face of Uncertainty

Given the situation, international students—both current and prospective—are being advised to plan carefully. Those currently on OPT or close to graduation should:

Start the process of obtaining H-1B sponsorship early and participate in the visa lottery

Consult immigration attorneys or legal advisors for tailored advice

Explore alternative destinations offering stable and accessible work visa policies

For those planning to pursue education in the US, it is now essential to factor in the risk that the OPT program may be revoked and to have contingency plans in place.

Final Reflections

Should this bill pass, the implications for international students in the US would be profound. The proposed law could dismantle a key pathway from education to employment, jeopardizing the futures of thousands of students and possibly deterring many more from ever applying to study in the US.

While supporters of the bill may argue it aligns with efforts to tighten immigration policies, the reality could be far more damaging. It threatens to trigger a substantial brain drain and significantly alter global patterns in higher education and workforce development.

As the debate unfolds, students, families, educators, and employers alike are watching closely. One thing is clear—removing OPT would not just change lives, but reshape the role of the United States in the global education and tech talent ecosystem.

Threat to OPT Visa Sparks Panic Among Indian STEM Students in the US

April 8, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation, Immigration 0

A new bill introduced in the US Congress is stirring anxiety among Indian and international students pursuing degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The proposed legislation aims to eliminate the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, which currently enables graduates on student visas to stay in the United States and gain work experience for up to three years after completing their studies.

OPT has served as a crucial bridge between academia and employment, especially for students holding F-1 and M-1 visas. However, with this new legislative threat, many students now face the grim possibility of having to leave the country immediately after graduation if they fail to secure another type of visa. The bill comes at a time when the US administration, under President Donald Trump’s continued influence, is pursuing a series of strict immigration measures, including mass deportations. These policies align with Trump’s earlier campaign promises to tighten immigration, a move that began during his first term and appears to be intensifying again.

Legal experts and advisors have observed rising panic among current international students, particularly those from India. Many are scrambling to secure jobs that would allow them to shift from OPT to H-1B work visas, which are typically sponsored by large American and Indian tech firms. The urgency stems from the potential abrupt termination of OPT without viable alternatives.

According to the latest Open Doors 2024 report, over 300,000 Indian students were enrolled in US universities during the 2023-24 academic year. Of these, nearly one-third qualify for OPT, highlighting the widespread impact the bill could have on the Indian student community.

“OPT allows students to find jobs in the US for one year after they graduate and may be extended for another two years provided you are a STEM graduate and are working with a qualified US employer,” explained Poorvi Chothani of LawQuest, an immigration law firm based in Florida. “If the bill goes through, OPT could end abruptly without an option to transition to another work visa. Students may have to leave the US immediately.”

At present, students who are not in STEM fields are allowed to remain in the US for only a year following graduation. The elimination of OPT would affect STEM students more severely since they currently enjoy an extended work authorization of up to three years.

Chothani emphasized that OPT visa holders must now move quickly to transition to H-1B status as soon as possible if they are selected in the annual lottery. Otherwise, they will need to seek job opportunities in other countries. She also warned that incoming students may need to prepare for a scenario resembling the United Kingdom’s policies, where graduates are expected to leave the country upon completing their education.

“The biggest fallout, though, will be missing out on work opportunities and the ability to earn a US salary for a couple of years or so to pay back hefty student loans,” said Chothani.

The potential dismantling of OPT is taking a psychological toll on Indian students currently in the US. “They are all now clouded with doubt,” said Adarsh Khandelwal, cofounder of Collegify, a platform that supports students planning to study abroad.

This uncertainty is already disrupting student routines and decisions. “Conversations once dominated by case competitions and coding bootcamps are now replaced with legal webinars and immigration forums,” said Khandelwal. The Economic Times previously reported that Indian students are rethinking their travel plans during summer breaks, with many canceling their trips home for fear that they might face challenges re-entering the US. Top-tier institutions like Cornell, Columbia, and Yale have unofficially recommended that international students avoid leaving the country during this period of uncertainty.

Despite these complications, the US remains the top choice for Indian students studying overseas. However, the growing restrictions under the Trump administration have prompted some to look elsewhere. Advisors and consultants are observing a notable shift in interest toward alternative destinations such as Canada and various European countries. According to experts, Indian applications to non-US countries have increased by 20% for the 2025 and 2026 academic cycles.

With these changing trends, families are becoming more cautious and focused on long-term security after graduation. “Families are seeking post-study certainty. Studying in the US is not cheap as it requires a yearly investment of $60,000,” Khandelwal pointed out.

In terms of economic contribution, international students continue to play a significant role in the US. Data from NAFSA: Association of International Educators revealed that during the 2023-2024 academic year, foreign students contributed a record $43.8 billion to the US economy and supported nearly 378,175 jobs. These numbers underscore the financial and workforce impact of international students, especially those utilizing programs like OPT.

Legal experts argue that the removal of OPT could hurt the US economy by driving talent elsewhere. “Additionally, numerous companies employ OPT candidates primarily due to their skills and abilities, rather than solely relying on purported cost-saving loopholes,” noted Keshav Singhania, head of private clients at Singhania & Co, a legal firm.

Singhania warned that eliminating the OPT program would lead to a displacement of skilled talent to other nations that offer more favorable immigration policies for international graduates. Countries like Canada, Australia, and Germany already present attractive post-study work options, and without OPT, the US could find itself losing its competitive edge in attracting global talent.

In response to growing student concerns, US universities are ramping up support systems. Nikhil Jain, founder of ForeignAdmits, a platform that assists students in navigating international education, said colleges are stepping in to provide legal guidance. “US colleges are hosting immigration attorneys, providing guidance and creating support networks to help anxious students,” he said.

The uncertainty surrounding OPT has not only rattled current students but also created hesitation among prospective applicants. Many are now questioning the long-term benefits of investing heavily in a US education when post-study work opportunities may be curtailed.

As the situation develops, much hinges on whether the bill will gain legislative traction. Past attempts to eliminate or restrict OPT have failed, but the current climate of heightened immigration enforcement raises the stakes. Until more clarity emerges, Indian students and their families are left navigating a complex and unstable path, trying to make the best possible decisions in an increasingly unpredictable environment.

Indian Nurses Association of New York Organizes Free Continuing Education Day at Kerala Center, Elmont, NY Paul D Panakal

April 8, 2025 Ajay GhoshEducation, Health 0

With the constantly advancing healthcare practices, knowledge, and technologies, nurses are expected and are required to be kept abreast of the latest in the field. The first continuing education conference organized by Indian Nurses Association of New York (INANY) at Kerala Center in Elmont, New York was aimed at helping nurses and nurse practitioners to integrate the advancements in their professional practice. The continuing education credits awarded to nurses could also strengthen their ability for reaching for elevated opportunities.

The first presentation focused on the heart disease in women. It is he leading cause of death worldwide. However, the disease often presents differently in women and men. Grace Geevarghese, a cardiology nurse practitioner at Northwell Health System, discussed about the various sides of heart disease affecting women. Every year more women die of heart attack than those with cancer. Two out of three women have one or more higher risk factors which increase with age. The size and structure of heart is different for women and men. A woman’s heart and blood vessels are smaller and muscular walls are thinner than that of men which make them susceptible for higher risks. Build up of plaque which is the combination of fat, cholesterol calcium, and other substances from the blood obstructs the blood flow in the arteries that lead to coronary artery diseases. Though the hormone estrogen gives women with some protection, menopause marks a significant hormonal shift due to the decline in estrogen levels. Consequently, risk for heart disease in postmenopausal women increases. Ms. Geevarghese detailed the early symptoms, ways to diagnose and methods of treatment.

Human trafficking, a serious global public health crisis issue and violation of human rights, was the topic of the next presentation by Northwell Health, the largest private healthcare system in New York State. Wilonda Greene, the Senior Program Manager of Human Trafficking Education, Advocacy, Response and Training Program Institute of the Community Wellness and Health talked about the sex and labor trafficking that happen around us and around the world. People who are vulnerable due to various factors including abuse and neglect, intimate partner violence, substance abuse, LGBTQ+, runaways, homeless and other marginalized, or due to family factors are among those victimized through force, fraud or coercion by culprits for profitability. She said up to eighty-eight per cent of the victims seek medical care while being trafficked. However, these individuals are often misdiagnosed and miss the signs due to lack of training and knowledge of the clinicians. Ms. Greene educated the audience about the wide range of red flags, ways to gather information through appropriate screening, and means of taking action and partake in reducing the criminal exploitation and human life.

Dr. Narendra Singh, a renowned expert in pulmonary medicine, critical care, and sleep disorders, discussed obstructive sleep apnea—a common yet potentially serious condition characterized by repeated interruptions in breathing during sleep. He highlighted that this disorder is a significant public health issue, affecting an estimated 25 to 30 million adults in the United States. However, only a small percentage of individuals receive a formal diagnosis, leaving many at risk for complications such as metabolic disorders, cardiovascular conditions like heart attacks, fatty liver disease, gestational diabetes, memory deficits, and even glaucoma. In his presentation, Dr. Singh covered key aspects of the condition, including visible symptoms, screening methods, diagnostic tests, and available treatment options to manage and mitigate its impact.

In recognition of the contributions INANY as a professional nursing organization of Indian American nurses in New York, the organization was awarded two grants in the past years. One for $10,000 and another one last year for $16,800 out of the funds allocated for Asian American Pacific Islander communities. In collaboration with Coalition of Asian Families and Children, INANY has been making strides to mitigate the ill-effects of anti-Asian hate incidents in New York. Everyone in the community has at some point in American society has had discrimination in many forms including physical and verbal assaults, bias, threats, bullying and so on. Its Grants and Research Committee has been educating the public, especially the community, to embrace responsibility as a bystander to extend helping hands without compromising self-safety. Dr. Anna George, Dr. Shyla Roshin and Dr. Solymole Kuruvilla presented an interactive training program focused on five different strategies known as 5-D interventions. The goal is to empower the participant to use one or more of the strategies if they witness hate-related incidents.

Annie Sabu, the chair of educational and professional development committee moderated the day’s program. Those attended received four free continuing education credit hours, breakfast, lunch and evening coffee and snacks. Dr. Anna George and Dr. Shyla Roshin thanked Agape Trinity Insurance for sponsoring the part of the program and acknowledged the grants received. Assistance from Anto Paul Aininkal, Dr. Anna George, Dr. Shila Roshin, Usha George, Grace Alexander, Roshan Mammen, and Dr. Jaya Thomas made the charitable event a meaningful and successful one.

Indian Students Abroad Face Harsh Realities Amid Shrinking Opportunities and Soaring Risks

April 7, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Indian students seeking higher education abroad are now encountering a far more complex reality than what glossy brochures and Instagram highlights portray. As global job markets contract and immigration rules become stricter, the once-linear path from an international degree to a high-paying job has become uncertain and fraught with risk. Increasingly, Indian graduates are finding themselves dealing with limited job prospects, overwhelming student debt, and subtle discrimination that can hinder both career progression and social acceptance. The dream of studying overseas, long seen as a surefire route to upward mobility, is now turning into a high-stakes gamble—one that requires deep introspection about personal goals, motivations, and the risks involved.

A revealing Reddit post by an Indian student recently sparked widespread debate on the topic. The student questioned the widespread desire to pursue higher education abroad, especially during a time of global economic instability. “Why is everyone so keen on going abroad for higher studies?” the student asked, voicing skepticism toward what they see as a trend driven more by aspiration than realism.

Their critique pulled no punches. “USA has instability with Trump’s rule, Canada is a dead end (believe me I lived in Canada for 5 years and now back in India). Australia has HCOL and impossible PR. Europe has language barriers. These are the major issues,” they wrote. They went on to say, “I see people posting in this sub about taking huge loans and going abroad for masters/phd/post grad. Mostly see education as an escape to another country and pathway to PR… My concern is literally every country is going through job market crisis so why does everyone wanna go when economy is down everywhere?”

In sharing their own journey, the student highlighted the disconnect between expectations and reality. “I have bachelors in CS and masters in Information security from Canada. I came back to India cause Canada has a dead market be it any field. I am struggling to find a job in India. On the other hand, my friends who graduated from CSE have high paying jobs and great career… This is an eye opening post for everyone, don’t blindly follow the trend of going abroad. Invest in your career.”

This viral post drew a range of responses, some agreeing with the sentiment, others providing alternative perspectives. One user commented, “Living conditions in India are far from ideal… Higher education is plagued by reservations… job security is uncertain… Bollywood movies and YouTube influencers glorify life in foreign countries.” They criticized how these romanticized images of the West drive demand for overseas education—often funded by Indian parents. But they also warned of the repercussions: “In the past five years, a significant number of below-average Indian students have enrolled in European universities… ending up in low-paying jobs… Some submit fake documents to secure university admissions… damaging the reputation of genuine Indian students.”

A member of a university committee added a more institutional perspective, citing troubling trends in student behavior. “We are bringing in fraudulent and misogynistic behavior into other cultures… Indians get compared to others now. Some blame Indians for making a lobby and slogging more hours at cheap rates just to appease higher management.”

Other voices in the thread offered more balanced viewpoints. One user explained their motivation wasn’t tied to job prospects, but rather academic ambition. “I’m not someone who’s going abroad for job opportunities, I just want to do better quality research,” they wrote. They acknowledged the deficiencies in India’s research funding environment but warned peers against assuming that foreign institutions would reward average performance. “Don’t dream of surviving in another country by maintaining your mediocrity from India,” they added.

Criticism of the Canadian education system also surfaced. One commenter pointed out the rise of “diploma mills”—institutions offering low-quality degrees that still attract large numbers of Indian students. “Even a vast majority of those who pursue legitimate degrees have been attending these diploma mills… shocking to see how many take on loans to attend [them] and push themselves into debt,” the user noted.

Despite the many warnings and frustrations aired in the thread, not all users were disillusioned. Some still saw the pursuit of education abroad as a transformative life experience. One student offered a more optimistic take: “I want to experience this life… explore what their culture offers… it would help me mature.” For them, the motivation was rooted in personal development, not merely financial success.

Returning to the conversation, the original poster clarified their position, emphasizing that they weren’t against the idea of studying abroad in itself. “There’s nothing wrong with moving abroad… Everyone deserves a better lifestyle and better pay. The main concern… is to give a reality check. Every country has limited jobs and limited immigration seats. Not everyone is gonna get what they want. I hope everyone achieve their dreams!”

Their message resonated because it highlighted the growing disconnect between the global education dream and the economic and social realities that now define it. For decades, studying abroad has been perceived as a golden ticket to success, with countries like the United States, Canada, Australia, and parts of Europe seen as ideal destinations for upward mobility. However, that perception is beginning to shift. As these countries grapple with political changes, tighter immigration controls, and economic instability, Indian students are finding that the opportunities they hoped for aren’t always guaranteed.

The impact is not just financial, though the burden of student loans—often taken with the assumption of a future high salary—has become an increasing source of anxiety. There’s also a psychological toll. The cultural alienation, the stress of legal uncertainties around visa status, and the pressure to succeed in unfamiliar environments add to the burden students must carry. Subtle discrimination in both academic and professional settings can further complicate the journey. In some cases, Indian students feel they are being judged not just on their individual merits, but as representatives of a larger group—a group that is now under more scrutiny due to cases of document fraud or exploitative labor practices.

All of this raises important questions about the future of international education as a model for Indian students. Should students still pursue degrees abroad in an increasingly volatile and competitive world? The answer may depend not just on academic ambition or career prospects, but on a realistic understanding of what lies ahead.

In an era where global opportunities are no longer as plentiful or predictable, the decision to study abroad demands more than aspiration—it requires strategy, self-awareness, and an honest assessment of what success truly looks like.

What High-Achieving Students’ Parents Do Differently: Key Habits That Foster Independence and Success

April 6, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

For nearly ten years, I’ve worked closely with hundreds of students and their families as an extracurricular coach at Spike Lab. During this time, I’ve seen these students accomplish extraordinary feats — winning prestigious awards, securing venture capital, launching businesses, and initiating impressive projects. These achievements have set them apart in the ultra-competitive college admissions landscape, where standing out both inside and outside the classroom is essential. Many of these students have earned spots at top-tier institutions like Stanford, Harvard, and Princeton.

As I collaborated with them, I gained insights not just into the students’ strengths but also into their family dynamics. Across the board, I noticed a pattern among the parents of these high-achievers. They all tended to do a few key things — early and consistently — that helped lay the foundation for their child’s success. Here are four of the most important habits I’ve observed.

First, these parents avoid “snowplow” parenting. This approach involves removing all obstacles from a child’s path in an attempt to make life easier for them. It can be as minor as a parent coordinating emails on their child’s behalf (sometimes even pretending to be the child), or as major as writing the student’s college essay for them. Although these actions may be driven by love and the desire to help, they ultimately backfire.

This kind of parenting teaches children that they don’t have to take responsibility for their own actions — that someone else will always step in to solve their problems. In contrast, the most successful students I’ve worked with are those who learn to take charge, especially when things get tough. Instead of shielding them from challenges, the parents of these students serve as supportive advisors who only step in when truly necessary.

Letting children experience the natural outcomes of their inaction — like missing a deadline or falling short on a project — can teach them powerful lessons. They’re less likely to repeat the same mistakes when they face real consequences. As a result, they grow into more resilient and self-sufficient individuals.

Second, these parents show genuine respect for their children’s interests. I’ve worked with students who have pursued highly specific and unconventional passions, and I’ve seen them achieve remarkable results. For example, one student developed an elementary school math curriculum based on baseball statistics. Another started a knitting circle specifically for athletes. These projects weren’t chosen because they were “impressive” on paper, but because the students cared deeply about them.

While it’s natural for some parents to want to guide their children toward more “serious” or traditionally successful pursuits, it’s more beneficial to let kids follow their passions. “You never know what kind of success can come from supporting those passions and helping them flourish,” I’ve observed. Encouraging children to dig deeper into their own curiosities often leads to greater engagement, creativity, and fulfillment.

However, that doesn’t mean every hobby needs to evolve into a lifelong commitment. Not all interests will become passions, and that’s okay. It’s also critical that parents avoid nudging their children into activities solely because they believe it will strengthen a college application. Authenticity matters far more, both for personal growth and for standing out in admissions.

Third, successful parents nurture independence from an early age. Today, it’s not unusual to see elementary schoolers with schedules as busy as high school seniors — soccer practice, art classes, music lessons, tutoring sessions. While structured activities can be valuable, they often leave little room for free, unstructured time — and that’s a problem.

Research supports the idea that children who spend more time in unstructured environments develop stronger independence. I’ve seen firsthand how beneficial this can be. One of my most emotionally mature students, for instance, had been walking to school by themselves from a young age. This simple habit gave them a sense of autonomy and confidence that carried over into many areas of their life.

Even seemingly small, everyday decisions — like choosing what to wear or what to eat — can help kids build decision-making skills. Encouraging this kind of autonomy early on fosters not just independence, but also creativity and self-assurance.

Fourth, the parents of thriving students consistently model positive behavior. This is arguably one of the most powerful yet overlooked parenting strategies. Children are constantly observing the adults around them, and they tend to adopt the behaviors they see modeled at home.

If you want your kids to develop healthy screen habits, don’t constantly be on your phone when you’re around them. If you want them to value physical fitness, make sure they regularly see you exercising. “Think about the person you want your child to become,” I always suggest. “Ask yourself: Am I demonstrating those traits in front of them?”

It’s not just about what you say, but what you do. Children pick up on inconsistencies between your actions and your words. If you stress the importance of responsibility, purpose, and hard work, but your own habits suggest otherwise, your message won’t resonate. But if you live those values out loud, they’re more likely to stick.

Ultimately, these four strategies — avoiding over-involvement, honoring children’s interests, encouraging independence, and setting a strong example — create an environment where kids can truly thrive. It’s not about micromanaging their every move or molding them into a specific idea of success. It’s about giving them the tools, confidence, and support to carve their own path.

I’ve seen this formula work again and again. The students who succeed not just in college admissions but in life are those who were trusted early on to take responsibility, explore their interests, and learn from their mistakes. Their parents aren’t perfect, but they understand the long-term value of raising independent, motivated, and self-aware young adults.

As a coach, it’s been a privilege to witness their journeys — and it all starts at home, with the quiet yet powerful influence of a parent who leads with intention and trust.

Indian Students Shift Abroad Preferences as US, UK, and Canada See 40% Drop in Enrollments

April 5, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The number of Indian students opting for higher education in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada has fallen sharply by 40% in 2024, signaling a notable shift in global student mobility trends. As these traditional destinations experience a downturn in interest, alternative countries such as Germany and New Zealand are witnessing substantial growth in Indian student enrollments. These emerging destinations are gaining ground due to more stable immigration policies, lower education costs, and better post-study work opportunities.

According to data cited by the ICEF Monitor, figures from the Indian government indicate a 15% decline in the total number of Indian students studying abroad in 2024 when compared to the previous year. Among the traditionally popular countries, Canada saw the steepest drop, with Indian student numbers plunging by 41%, from 233,500 in 2023 to 137,600 in 2024. The United Kingdom followed with a 28% decrease, while the United States experienced a 13% drop. Australia also saw a 12% reduction. Collectively, these nations accounted for 72% of Indian students abroad in 2024, although their overall share is clearly diminishing.

The decline is attributed to various interconnected factors, most notably the increasing cost of tuition and more restrictive visa conditions. For Indian students, who typically seek not just academic excellence but also work experience and pathways to immigration, these evolving challenges in major destinations have become deterrents. The depreciation of the Indian Rupee against the US Dollar has further exacerbated financial pressures, making higher education in these countries even more burdensome.

As ICEF Monitor notes, Indian students are now being drawn toward destinations that offer affordability and clearer post-study career pathways. Germany and New Zealand, in particular, have emerged as major beneficiaries of this changing landscape.

Germany saw its Indian student population rise dramatically by 68% from 2022 to 2024, increasing from 20,700 to 34,700. This surge is credited to Germany’s reputable educational system, low tuition costs, and favorable policies around post-study employment. New Zealand, meanwhile, recorded an even more dramatic rise. The number of Indian students in the country skyrocketed by 354% in the same period—from just 1,600 students in 2022 to 7,300 in 2024.

As per ICEF Monitor’s report, New Zealand has become the most inviting English-speaking destination for Indian students, due in part to its flexible visa procedures and a secure living environment. The country’s well-regarded education system and the availability of graduate work visas have made it a strong contender for Indian students seeking both quality learning and future employment prospects.

A key contributor to the downturn in the US, UK, and Canada is the ongoing tightening of immigration regulations. As highlighted by ICEF Monitor, policy shifts—especially those under President Donald Trump’s administration in the US—have led to a climate of uncertainty for international students. The challenges in bringing family members, securing post-graduation work rights, and transitioning to permanent residency have collectively made these nations less appealing.

Additionally, the fluctuation of currency exchange rates has impacted affordability. The falling value of the Indian Rupee against the Dollar has led to an increase in effective education costs, even when tuition rates themselves remain unchanged. Eela Dubey, co-founder of EduFund, emphasized this point in her comment to ICEF Monitor: “Rupee depreciation acts as hidden inflation for Indian students aspiring to study abroad, significantly increasing the cost of education, even if universities do not raise tuition fees.”

In contrast, countries like Germany are drawing Indian students with promises of high-quality education at a fraction of the cost, along with a more predictable and student-friendly policy environment. Similarly, New Zealand’s rising popularity is being fueled by its reputation for safety, its supportive visa structure, and long-term prospects for students post-graduation.

Experts argue that the change in student preferences should not be viewed as a total collapse of interest in the Big Four destinations, but rather a rebalancing of priorities. Maria Mathai, founder of MM Advisory Services, told ICEF Monitor that “students are responding pragmatically to shifting costs and changing visa rules,” noting that the trend reflects a “recalibration” rather than an outright “exit” from traditional destinations.

Today’s Indian students are more strategic in evaluating where to study. They are considering not only academic rankings but also work options after graduation and the consistency of immigration rules. As Mathai explained, “Our destination maps now have layered overlays – visa stability indices atop rankings.”

This transformation highlights a broader shift in the mindset of Indian students. The decision-making process now includes questions around economic feasibility, visa reliability, and long-term career opportunities, rather than focusing solely on prestigious university names.

India, with its vast pool of students seeking education abroad, will continue to play a major role in global education dynamics. But the way Indian students approach studying overseas is evolving. The demand remains strong, but students are now seeking countries that offer a more comprehensive package—academic excellence, cost-efficiency, safety, and long-term stability.

As such, countries like Germany and New Zealand, which provide favorable policies and affordability, are expected to keep expanding their market share in the coming years. These destinations are perceived not just as educational centers, but also as platforms for broader career development.

On the other hand, the US, UK, and Canada will need to reconsider their strategies if they aim to sustain their appeal to Indian students. With the global education market becoming increasingly competitive, these traditional powerhouses may find it necessary to adjust visa policies and affordability options to align with the changing preferences of international students.

Ultimately, the shift represents a new chapter in the story of Indian student mobility. It reflects an increasingly discerning student body that is prioritizing not just academic reputation, but also real-world outcomes and security. Countries that align with these needs are likely to emerge as new leaders in international education.

Rakesh Khurana Reflects on 11 Years as Harvard College Dean

March 30, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

For Rakesh Khurana, understanding the mission comes first. Without it, decisions about what to do next and how to proceed lose meaning.

That guiding principle has shaped Khurana’s tenure as the Danoff Dean of Harvard College, a role he will step down from at the end of the academic year after 11 years. He will return to teaching in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences and at Harvard Business School.

Khurana, who serves as the Marvin Bower Professor of Leadership Development and a professor of sociology, first arrived at Harvard in 1993 as a graduate student. He earned a master’s in sociology in 1997 and a Ph.D. in organizational behavior in 1998.

During his time as dean, he worked to enhance opportunities in the arts and public service, reorganized office infrastructure to better support students, helped launch the Intellectual Vitality initiative, and championed the recruitment of students from diverse backgrounds.

He also established a presence on Instagram, affectionately called the “Deanstagram.” In this edited conversation, Khurana discusses his accomplishments, lessons learned, and reflections on Harvard’s community.

Khurana is among the longest-serving deans of Harvard College. Reflecting on his tenure, he finds particular satisfaction in having served in what he considers the best role in higher education. As an immigrant, he grew up in a family that regarded higher education as sacred, with Harvard being a symbol of that ideal.

From the outset, his administration focused on being a mission-oriented institution, committed to educating citizen leaders. This mission was pursued through the transformative experience of a liberal arts and science education, emphasizing intellectual, social, and personal development.

“One of the things that I feel good about is that there’s a strong sense of understanding of the College’s mission,” Khurana said. “That clarity has let us take numerous actions on everything ranging from adopting an honor code, which is emblematic of the kind of aspiration that we want to have for our students, to the renewal of the Gen Ed program, which occurred at a time when there was a debate over whether it would even continue.”

The commitment to a broad general education anchored in the liberal arts remains vital. He highlighted Professor Michael Sandel’s renewed “Justice” class as an example of an intergenerational connection between students and alumni, bridging past and present while addressing contemporary issues.

Khurana also takes pride in the Intellectual Vitality initiative, which his team had worked on for several years. A data-driven yet adaptable approach enabled Harvard to focus on substance rather than trends. He hopes that his legacy includes a steadfast commitment to the mission while ensuring institutional evolution.

“To be in a place where the past is being honored, the present is being contended with, and where the future is being shaped through research is an incredible privilege,” he said.

Reflecting on challenges faced during his tenure, Khurana believes that universities both reflect and magnify the world beyond their campuses. The opportunity to bring together students from diverse backgrounds is invaluable but requires intentional community-building efforts.

“Creating this community requires building a lot of capacities and skills and role modeling,” he noted. “Maybe in the past we could take for granted that this all existed, but I think we can’t assume that students and faculty and staff are coming here with this understanding.”

Acknowledging that Harvard is not a perfect institution, he emphasized its long-standing recognition that excellence takes many forms. This evolving understanding moves the university closer to its motto of veritas.

Khurana, an organizational sociologist who has studied institutions, leadership, and bureaucracy, found that the practical experience of being dean was different from what he had anticipated. The gap between knowing theories and implementing them became evident.

Three principles remained central to his leadership: mission, vision, and values. “The power of that is something I’d been teaching about for years, and it’s so interesting to see how powerful it is and how easy it is to forget,” he said. He ensured that every meeting started by reaffirming the College’s mission.

Another lesson was the scrutiny that comes with leadership. “When you’re in a position of responsibility, you are constantly role modeling,” he observed. “People are not just paying attention to what you say, but to what you do. Your walk has to be your talk.”

Khurana likened leadership to coaching, where one helps individuals align their aspirations with their skills. In the process, he found that he was also coaching himself. He also recognized that everyone is a work in progress and that surrounding oneself with people committed to the mission, vision, and values fosters trust and progress.

The most challenging moment of his tenure was the COVID-19 pandemic. Harvard had to adjust to a world without the campus experiences that define it—the serendipitous interactions, diverse perspectives, and shared spaces. “To de-densify campus in a short time period, to try to deal with the reality of the situation, the uncertainty that it presented, and keep academic continuity… That was the most challenging moment,” he said. Despite the difficulties, he was proud of how the university came together as one institution to navigate the crisis.

“Harvard is not a perfect institution. I don’t think we should be a perfect institution because if we were coming close to that ideal, that would mean we are not playing a big enough game,” he remarked.

Khurana has been vocal about declining trust in higher education and believes rebuilding it requires reinforcing Harvard’s core strengths. The university’s legitimacy, he said, is rooted in academic excellence and meritocracy.

“There are three things that institutions like ours should be doing,” he stated. “One is that we convene excellence—in our faculty, our students, and staff.” He believes highlighting excellence in bringing people together is essential.

Second, he emphasized Harvard’s commitment to veritas. “We need to be an institution that lives with an uncomfortable truth rather than a comfortable delusion.”

Third, he advocated for streamlining the institution. Harvard has a responsibility to foster open discussions on complex issues. It must also ensure that families investing in education receive effective teaching while upholding the moral responsibility of shaping young minds.

“When you are politicized, people believe you are producing biased research, not encouraging independent thinking, inculcating ideology, or not allowing for conversations on difficult topics,” he warned.

Many in the community view Khurana as approachable. He admits this wasn’t always the case. As a college student, he often ate meals alone, preferring to immerse himself in academic discussions with scholars like Max Weber and John Stuart Mill through books. Over time, he realized the value of learning from peers.

He attributes his sense of humility to his mother, who taught him, “Nobody’s better than you, but you’re also not better than anyone else.” This perspective encouraged him to engage with everyone, from faculty to custodial staff, recognizing that each person has an interesting story to share.

“I would often look for the student who was sitting by themselves at a meal and think to myself, ‘I wish somebody would have sat with me at that time,’” he said. That inclination led him to become a faculty dean at Cabot House, where he became comfortable initiating conversations.

Born in India, Khurana’s parents immigrated to the U.S. in pursuit of better educational opportunities for their children. His mother was a public school teacher in the Bronx, and his father was an accountant. His mother prioritized access to the best schools, even moving neighborhoods to secure better educational prospects.

He began his higher education at SUNY Binghamton before transferring to Cornell, encouraged by a professor who saw potential in him. That moment exemplified the power of a teacher’s belief in a student, which Khurana now strives to recreate for others.

His path to Harvard started when an HBS faculty member visited the tech startup where he worked and encouraged him to apply to graduate school. The following year, he was at Harvard.

One of his greatest joys is being on campus. “To be in a place where the past is being honored, the present is being contended with, and where the future is being shaped through research is an incredible privilege,” he said.

Looking ahead, Khurana plans to continue sharing his experiences on Instagram, believing that transparency can help rebuild trust in institutions. “You can’t tell that Harvard is trying to be the best for the world. You have to show it,” he said.

US Student Visa Rejection Rate Hits Decade-High

March 29, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The United States saw student visa denials reach a decade-high in the last fiscal year (October 2023 to September 2024), with 41% of F-1 visa applications from all countries rejected, nearly doubling the rejection rate from the 2014 fiscal year, according to an analysis by The Indian Express of U.S. State Department data.

During the 2023-24 fiscal year, the U.S. received approximately 679,000 applications for F-1 visas, of which 279,000 (41%) were denied. This marked an increase from the 2022-23 fiscal year, when 253,000 applications (36%) out of 699,000 were turned down.

Although the U.S. State Department did not disclose country-specific rejection rates for F-1 visas, The Indian Express previously reported on December 9, 2023, that the number of student visas issued to Indians in the first nine months of 2024 had dropped by 38% compared to the same period in 2023.

Over the past decade, the total number of student visa applications fluctuated, reaching a peak of 856,000 in 2014-15 before declining in subsequent years. The lowest number was recorded in 2019-2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, with just 162,000 applications. Post-pandemic, applications steadily increased but saw a slight decline of 3% in 2023-24 compared to the previous year, from 699,000 to 679,000. The 279,000 denials in 2023-24 represented the highest percentage of rejections in at least a decade. The total number of F-1 visas issued in the last fiscal year was 401,000, down from 445,000 in 2022-23.

The F-1 visa is a non-immigrant visa category for students attending academic institutions in the U.S., while the M-1 visa is for vocational and non-academic programs. The Indian Express analysis focused on F-1 visas, which account for over 90% of U.S. student visas issued annually.

When asked about the reasons behind the increase in F-1 visa rejections, a Department of State spokesperson told The Indian Express, “All visa adjudications are adjudicated on a case-by-case basis, in accordance with the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and applicable federal regulations.”

The State Department did not provide country-specific rejection data for F-1 visas, stating that it does not “publish data to the granularity requested.” Additionally, the department cited a “change in methodology” for calculating visa data from FY2019 onwards and directed queries to the annual ‘Report of the Visa Office’ for finalized fiscal year statistics.

“Our previousmethodology was based on a count of workload actions, which were not linked by application. The new methodology more accurately reflects final outcomes from the visa application process during a specified reporting period. The new methodology follows visa applications, including updates to their status (i.e., issued or refused), which could change as the fiscal year progresses, or result in slight changes in data for earlier years. Therefore, beginning with FY 2020, individual monthly issuance reports should not be aggregated, as this will not provide an accurate issuance total for the fiscal year to date,” the spokesperson explained.

While country-specific breakdowns of F-1 visa rejections remain unavailable, The Indian Express reported last December that 64,008 student visas were issued to Indians between January and September 2024, down from 103,000 during the same period in 2023. The U.S. State Department’s website has since updated its monthly reports from March to September, revising the total issued for the nine-month period to 63,973.

For comparison, 65,235 student visas were issued to Indians during the same period in 2021, and 93,181 were granted in 2022.

Indian students represent a significant share of the international student population in the U.S. According to the Open Doors 2024 report, Indian students outnumbered their Chinese counterparts in 2023-24, becoming the largest international student group in the U.S. with a 29.4% share. A record 331,000 Indian students were studying in the U.S. during the 2023-24 academic year, the highest number on record.

The rising F-1 visa rejection rate comes amid broader policy shifts in other countries aiming to curb international student numbers.

In 2024, Canada announced a cap on study permits, reducing approvals by 35% compared to 2023. The Canadian government attributed this decision to concerns about the strain international students place on housing, healthcare, and other public services. Canada has also planned an additional 10% cut in study permits for 2025.

Similarly, the United Kingdom, where Indian students are the second-largest international student group, has implemented measures to limit the influx of foreign students. New restrictions prevent foreign students from bringing dependents to the country. As a result, international student enrollment in British universities has dropped by up to 40%.

Trump’s Move to Shift Student Loans to SBA Sparks Outrage and Uncertainty

March 26, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

President Trump’s decision to transfer the federal student loan program from the Department of Education to the Small Business Administration (SBA) has alarmed borrowers and experts, who see it as further evidence that the administration lacks a concrete plan for dismantling the Education Department.

Trump signed an executive order on Thursday aimed at winding down the department, announcing that student loans would shift to the SBA the following day—coinciding with the agency’s announcement that it would cut 40% of its workforce.

While many have long criticized the student loan system, experts warn that placing the program under an agency with no experience handling student debt—especially amid major layoffs—will create more problems than it solves.

“No Background, No Plan”

“Borrowers right now are already experiencing an unprecedented level of chaos and uncertainty,” said Aissa Canchola Bañez, policy director at the Student Borrower Protection Center.

Moving student loans to the SBA, which “has no background of familiarity with the student loan program [or] the rights afforded to student loan borrowers under the Higher Education Act, will only make things worse,” she added.

Trump also announced that programs for students with disabilities would shift to the Department of Health and Human Services but provided no details on logistics for student loan borrowers.

Despite concerns, both the SBA and the Education Department welcomed the move.

“Whether it’s a loan for a business or a business degree, SBA is prepared to restore efficiency and accountability to our taxpayer-funded loan programs,” said SBA head Kelly Loeffler in a post on X.

At the same time, Loeffler confirmed that the administration planned to cut about 2,700 positions from the SBA’s nearly 6,500-member workforce.

Jessica Thompson, senior vice president at the Institute for College Access & Success, called the move reckless.

“All of this just really underscores that there has been no planning. There is no plan, and that is the most scary, frankly, and dangerous thing about this,” she said. “Because 44-plus million people owe money to the federal government from their student loans, and they are already in a state of confusion.”

Thompson stressed that transferring such a major program requires careful planning and congressional involvement.

A Department of Education spokesperson sought to calm concerns, stating that “no changes have been made yet, so there are no changes for student loan borrowers to navigate at this time.”

Borrowers Advised to Take Precautions

Advocates are urging borrowers to reach out to their loan officers and document all repayment efforts. The Department of Education has also slashed about half its workforce, adding to fears that servicing issues will worsen.

“I don’t know what element of the federal government I want chaos to be in, but I think one of the last places is federal student aid,” said James Murphy, director of career pathways and postsecondary policy at Education Reform Now. “That directly affects millions and millions of people in a very real way—paying for college and managing their loans.”

Borrowers are already in limbo as the Trump administration seeks to roll back student loan forgiveness programs established or expanded under former President Biden.

About 8 million borrowers are currently in forbearance under Biden’s Saving on Valuable Education (SAVE) income-driven repayment plan, which was ruled illegal by a court last month. Following the ruling, the Trump administration halted applications for all IDR plans, and although the Education Department promised to restore access soon, it has yet to do so.

“This Is the Wild West”

“There’s no good advice, and any expert giving advice doesn’t know what he’s talking about,” said Alan Collinge, founder of Student Loan Justice. “This is the Wild West. Right now, borrowers have zero power, and we’re being pushed around on a chessboard like pawns.”

Collinge believes the Trump administration is deliberately destabilizing the student loan system to devalue it before selling it to a third party.

Canchola Bañez advised borrowers to take three key steps:

Download their full payment history from the Federal Student Aid portal.
Screenshot any tracking information for loan forgiveness plans.
Contact members of Congress for assistance.

“Members of Congress have entire teams dedicated to helping constituents with federal agencies,” she said. “Borrowers should demand that their representatives start working on their behalf, especially if they’re not getting answers from the department.”

Small Nonprofit Ph.D. Project Faces Federal Scrutiny Amid DEI Crackdown

March 25, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

When Leyland Lucas pursued his Ph.D. at Rutgers University, he noticed a lack of professors in the business department who resembled him. As a Black man from Guyana, South America, he found guidance from a small nonprofit organization known as the Ph.D. Project, which played a crucial role in helping him navigate and complete his doctoral program.

“I am incredibly grateful to the program, which was fulfilling a very critical role,” said Lucas, who now serves as a dean at the University of Guyana.

For nearly three decades, the Ph.D. Project has offered mentorship, guidance, and resources to doctoral students from underrepresented communities in business education. Before moving back to Guyana, Lucas was a professor at Morgan State University in Baltimore, where he helped mentor aspiring Ph.D. candidates through the same program that had once supported him.

“If you see people like you who understand some of the challenges you are facing, and you can see them and see how they have overcome those challenges, that serves as an incentive for you,” Lucas explained.

Despite its mission of diversifying academia, the Ph.D. Project is now under federal scrutiny, drawing the attention of the Trump administration.

The U.S. Department of Education recently launched an investigation into 45 universities affiliated with the program, including institutions such as the University of Kansas, the University of Utah, and Ivy League schools like Yale and Cornell. Federal officials allege that the program’s eligibility criteria violate the 1964 Civil Rights Act by imposing race-based restrictions, effectively engaging in “race-exclusionary practices.”

This federal scrutiny comes amid a broader movement among universities to reevaluate their Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. Since taking office in January, President Trump has issued executive orders prohibiting DEI initiatives, instructing schools and colleges to “cease using race preferences and stereotypes” in areas such as hiring, admissions, and student programs. In response, some universities have shuttered diversity offices, removed DEI-related language from job descriptions, and renamed departments to eliminate references to diversity.

The Ph.D. Project has not been exempt from this shift. The University of Iowa recently severed ties with the nonprofit after the state’s Board of Regents voted to dismantle all DEI-related programs. Similarly, after the federal investigation was announced, the University of Kentucky withdrew its affiliation with the program, despite not currently having any doctoral students engaged with it.

Recognizing the changing climate, the Ph.D. Project has adjusted its mission. In February, it revised its statement, removing the term “diversity” and broadening its scope to be more inclusive.

“This year we opened up our application to anyone who is interested in helping to expand and broaden the pool of talent, both at the university level through faculty, as well as in corporate America,” said Alfonzo Alexander, the organization’s president and CEO.

“We’re really evolving so that we are able to do our work in today’s environment,” Alexander explained. “And if that means that we can no longer specify certain requirements, then we just evolve in a way that we can still create opportunities.”

The Impact of the Ph.D. Project

Since its inception, the Ph.D. Project has supported more than 1,500 doctoral students. It hosts annual conferences that offer insights into dissertation writing, stress management, and academic publishing. Many of its alumni have ascended to leadership roles, serving as university provosts, deans, professors, and business executives.

“The Ph.D. Project has changed my life because I was able to interact with individuals who looked like me and understood the journey that we were embarking on,” said Adrian Mayse, a Jackson State University graduate who later became a professor at Howard University and Talladega College.

Miles Davis, who first engaged with the program in 1995, echoed similar sentiments.

He had been working as a management consultant when he decided to pursue a Ph.D. at George Washington University. The Ph.D. Project introduced him to the possibility of an academic career.

“I did not know one full-time Black faculty member. And so the idea of academia as a path was not even a consideration,” Davis said. He has since served as a professor, dean, and university president.

Lucas and other alumni emphasized that participation in the Ph.D. Project did not come with special treatment or academic leniency.

“We had to face the same guidelines as everyone else. And once we got into those Ph.D. programs, we had to perform and we have performed,” Lucas stated.

He added, “I would really hate to see the Ph.D. Project somehow become misunderstood.”

The underrepresentation of minority faculty in business schools remains a concern. Data from 2020 indicates that fewer than 4% of business school faculty are Black, less than 3% are Hispanic, and only 0.3% are Native American or Alaska Native, according to the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. These figures do not reflect the growing diversity among college students, according to federal data.

Lucas believes the Ph.D. Project was working to address these disparities and fears that its mission may now be at risk due to misinterpretations of its purpose.

How the Ph.D. Project Became a Target of the Trump Administration

In February, the Trump administration launched an online portal at enddei.ed.gov, allowing individuals to submit reports of alleged discrimination at educational institutions. The portal states that these reports will help identify “potential areas for investigation.”

Wil Del Pilar, a senior official at the nonprofit Ed Trust, suspects that the investigation into the Ph.D. Project was initiated through this tip line.

“My assumption is that it came through the tip line,” Del Pilar said. Though he holds a Ph.D. himself, he admitted he had not heard of the Ph.D. Project until the federal inquiry was announced.

“We’ve effectively created a tool where people can tell on people and report anything that they believe to be discrimination or DEI. I expect we’re going to see more investigations based on this,” Del Pilar added.

It is not unusual for federal investigations to stem from online complaints. In the past, many inquiries by the Education Department have originated from reports filed through similar channels.

For instance, in 2018, a complaint was filed against the Rochester Institute of Technology, alleging that several STEM programs for women were discriminatory. The complaint came from a professor emeritus in Michigan who has reportedly filed hundreds of complaints against programs he believes discriminate based on sex or race. The federal government investigated, and RIT eventually opened its STEM programs to male students.

Historically, many of these investigations have concluded without finding violations. When corrective action was required, schools often opted to revise or discontinue certain programs rather than face penalties. While the Education Department has the authority to withhold federal funding, such measures have rarely been enforced.

However, the stakes appear higher in the current political climate. Trump has warned that universities that fail to align with his administration’s policies could lose substantial federal funding—a threat he has already acted upon at Columbia University and the University of Pennsylvania.

Uncertainty Looms Over the Ph.D. Project’s Future

The recent federal scrutiny loomed over the Ph.D. Project’s latest conference, held in Chicago over the weekend.

“It can be really scary for members of our organization to hear that their university may not continue partnering with us because of threats from the federal government of losing funding,” Alexander acknowledged.

Despite these concerns, he found encouragement in the conference’s atmosphere, where members shared stories about how the organization had transformed their lives.

“These times have caused us, just like many other entities, to pivot and transition,” Alexander said. “We may have to do it a little bit differently than what we’ve done in the past. But we will make sure that we continue on a path to where we’re impacting people in a positive way.”

Looking ahead, Alexander remains hopeful.

He said he wakes up every day “optimistic and recharged” and is confident that “when we look back a year or two years from now, we’ll be better and stronger as an organization than we were before this current environment.”

Trump Orders Dismantling of Education Department, But Faces Legal and Congressional Hurdles

March 21, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

This Trump executive order sounds dramatic, but the Department of Education (DOE) can’tactually be dismantled without Congressional approval. The order directs Education Secretary Linda McMahon to take steps to reduce the department’s influence and return power to the states, aligning with long-standing Republican priorities.

Key Points of the Order:

Calls for shutting down the DOE while ensuring that essential programs like Title I funding for high-poverty schools, Pell Grants, and student loans continue.
Bans remaining DOE funds from being used for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives or “gender ideology.”
Cuts department staff in half (from 4,000 to about 2,000 employees) through layoffs and buyouts, as part of a broader federal workforce reduction led by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency.
Aims to make the department “much smaller,” but acknowledges it won’t be fully eliminated—at least not immediately.

Legal and Political Challenges:

Only Congress can abolish the DOE, so Trump’s executive order doesn’t actually achieve that goal.
Teachers’ unions and Democrats are preparing legal challenges.
- American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten responded: “See you in court.”
- Patty Murray (D-Wash.) called it a “wrecking ball” approach.
- Advocates for student loan borrowers warn it will cause confusion and hardship for students.
Expands presidential authority: Trump’s efforts mirror his previous attempt to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which was blocked by a federal judge.

Trump’s Justification:

Argues that the U.S. spends too much per student but ranks low in global education performance.
Calls for a return to state control over education policy.
Claimsfederal bureaucracy has failed to improve education outcomes.

While the move is largely symbolic for now, it signals Trump’s continued push to reshape federal governance—and could have long-term implications if Republicans gain more power in Congress.

Indian Researcher at US University Arrested, Faces Deportation

March 20, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

An Indian researcher at a U.S. university has been arrested by immigration officers and is now facing deportation, according to his lawyer.

Badar Khan Suri was detained on Monday, March 17, outside his home in a Washington suburb in Virginia by “masked” officers who informed him that his student visa had been revoked, Politico reported.

Suri, who earned a PhD from Jamia Millia Islamia University in New Delhi, was a postdoctoral fellow at Georgetown University, where he was teaching a course on “Majoritarianism and Minority Rights in South Asia.”

Links to Palestinian Heritage Under Scrutiny

Suri is married to Maphaz Ahmad Yousef, a U.S. citizen and daughter of Ahmed Yousef, who was described by Hindustan Times, as quoted by Politico, as “a senior political advisor to the Hamas leadership.”

His lawyer, Hassan Ahmad, stated that a habeas corpus petition has been filed in a federal court in Virginia. Ahmad alleged that Suri’s arrest was motivated by his wife’s Palestinian heritage and the suspicion that they both oppose U.S. support for Israel. The lawyer emphasized that Suri has no criminal record and it remains unclear if he had participated in any protests.

Crackdown on Pro-Palestinian Supporters

Suri is the second Indian academic to face deportation over alleged ties to pro-Palestinian activism. Earlier this month, Ranjani Srinivasan, a PhD student at Columbia University, fled to Canada after an immigration officer informed her that her student visa had been revoked.

The Department of Homeland Security accused her of being “involved in activities supporting Hamas, a terrorist organization.”

Unlike in Srinivasan’s case and those of two other individuals arrested for allegedly participating in campus protests, the Trump administration has not issued a statement on Suri’s arrest.

Defending the crackdown on visa holders, Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on X, “Coming to the United States on a visa is a privilege, not a right. The Trump Administration is determined to deny or revoke your visa if you’re here to support terrorists.”

University Affiliation and Research

Georgetown University, a Catholic institution, stated that Suri was affiliated with the Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at the School of Foreign Service. His research focused on factors that hinder cooperation in religiously diverse societies and strategies to overcome those barriers. He had also traveled extensively in conflict zones, including India, Pakistan, and Iran’s Balochistan region.

Suri’s case is part of a broader crackdown on academics and students linked to pro-Palestinian activities on U.S. campuses.

Other Cases of Deportation and Detention

Several other foreign nationals have recently faced detention or deportation proceedings in connection with alleged pro-Palestinian activism:

Mahmoud Khalil, a recent graduate of Columbia University, was arrested and is currently held in a Louisiana detention center awaiting deportation, despite holding a green card. A judge has temporarily blocked his deportation pending appeal.
Leqaa Kordia, a Palestinian Columbia student, was arrested after being accused of overstaying her student visa.
Rasha Alawieh, a professor at Brown University, was denied re-entry into the U.S. after traveling to Lebanon and allegedly attending the funeral of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah.

As legal battles over these cases continue, advocates warn of increasing scrutiny on foreign nationals involved in pro-Palestinian activism.

Scholarship Suspensions Leave Thousands of International Students in Uncertainty

March 17, 2025March 17, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Thousands of international students in the United States are now facing an uncertain future following the suspension of several major scholarship programs, including Fulbright. The U.S. State Department has halted federal funding for these initiatives, leaving students without financial support.

Halyna Morozova, a Ukrainian international student enrolled at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville under the Fulbright program, shared her concerns with ABC News. Instead of receiving a full month’s financial aid, she was given only one week’s worth of funding.

Morozova, who teaches the Ukrainian language at the university, was informed by the Institute of International Education (IIE) that her usual monthly grant of $750 had been reduced to just $187.50. She expressed deep concern about her ability to continue her studies in the U.S. due to the uncertainty surrounding her financial support.

Another affected student, Frida Larios from California State University, found out about the funding suspension while already in Seoul, South Korea, as part of the Gilman scholarship program. Larios had expected to receive about $3,000 for her trip but has since been left in financial limbo, as reported by the New York Times.

The U.S. State Department announced in February that it was temporarily halting grant funding, affecting various study-abroad scholarships and government exchange programs. Although the funding was initially set to resume on February 27, it remains suspended, prolonging uncertainty for students and scholars.

According to the Fulbright Association, this suspension has directly impacted over 12,500 U.S. nationals who are either currently abroad or preparing for international exchange programs. Additionally, another 7,400 foreign nationals studying in the U.S. are expected to be affected by the funding freeze.

“The freeze on State Department grant programs threatens the survival of study abroad and international exchange programs that are essential to U.S. economic and national security,” the Association of International Educators (NAFSA) stated in a press release.

Indian Students Studying Abroad Decline in 2024 as Canada, UK, and US See Major Drops

March 12, 2025March 13, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The number of Indian students traveling abroad for higher education saw a significant decline in 2024, with Canada, the UK, and the US experiencing the most substantial drops. According to data from the Bureau of Immigration, student departures to these three nations fell by 27%, primarily due to stricter visa policies, increasing costs, and diplomatic tensions.

Meanwhile, other destinations such as Russia, Germany, and Uzbekistan have witnessed a rise in enrollments from Indian students.

Canada Experiences the Sharpest Decline

In just one year, the total number of Indian students in Canada, the UK, and the US decreased by 164,370. Canada was the most affected, recording a steep 41% drop, as the number of Indian students fell from 233,532 in 2023 to 137,608 in 2024. The UK and the US also saw reductions of 27% and 13%, respectively.

This contributed to an overall 15% decrease in the number of Indians pursuing education abroad, dropping from 892,989 in 2023 to 759,064 in 2024.

Diplomatic Tensions and Stricter Policies Impact Canada

The sharp reduction in Indian students heading to Canada coincided with worsening diplomatic relations between Ottawa and Delhi. The tensions escalated in September 2023 after Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused India of being involved in the killing of Sikh separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar.

In response to these allegations, India withdrew security for Canadian diplomats, which led Canada to recall 41 of its diplomats.

Following these developments, Canada imposed tighter visa and student permit rules. The Immigration Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) introduced new regulations granting authorities greater power to revoke study and work permits under specific conditions.

UK’s Visa Restrictions on Family Members

The UK also implemented policy changes affecting international students. In January 2024, the British government introduced a rule barring most international students—except those enrolled in postgraduate research or government-funded programs—from bringing family members.

This restriction likely discouraged Indian students, contributing to the 27% decline in enrollments in the UK.

Indian Students Seek Alternative Destinations

As the appeal of traditional study destinations waned, countries like Germany, Russia, and Uzbekistan emerged as preferred choices for Indian students.

Germany experienced an increase of 34,702 Indian students in 2024.

Similarly, Uzbekistan and Bangladesh saw growth, with 9,915 and 8,864 more Indian students enrolling, respectively.

Russia recorded a 34% surge in Indian student enrollments, benefiting from affordable education and more lenient visa policies.

This marks only the second time since 2019, excluding the pandemic year of 2020, that the number of Indian students studying abroad has dropped. Whether these figures recover in 2025 will depend on various factors, including visa regulations, diplomatic relations, and economic conditions.

Indian Student on OPT Stranded After F-1 Visa Canceled at Abu Dhabi Pre-Clearance

March 12, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

An Indian student on Optional Practical Training (OPT) faced an unexpected nightmare while returning to the United States. His journey took a drastic turn when his F-1 visa was revoked at the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) pre-clearance in Abu Dhabi, leaving him stranded in India and separated from his wife.

Sharing his ordeal on social media, the student revealed that CBP officers informed him that he lacked sufficient proof of employment, which led to the visa cancellation. However, his wife, who was traveling with him, was allowed to proceed to the U.S., forcing him to visit the American embassy for a new visa interview.

Detailing the incident, he wrote, “They analyzed I have insufficient proof of my work that I was doing, though I had all the supporting documents like EAD, job offer letter, vacation approval letter, valid I-20. They withdrew my visa and put cancelled on visa stamp. I still have active I-20 and SEVIS.”

Many pointed out that the long visa appointment wait times in India could jeopardize his OPT status. Moreover, the fact that his visa was marked as “canceled” rather than “canceled without prejudice” could impact his chances of securing future U.S. visas.

The Indian student also mentioned that his company is currently filing for an H-1B visa for him. However, this rejection has left him uncertain about his future. If his F-1 visa is denied, the wait for H-1B processing could stretch for months, further complicating his situation.

This incident serves as a stark reminder that even those with valid visas cannot take their travel for granted. A minor issue or an unexpected stopover can upend years of effort within minutes.

Indian OPT Workers in the US Face Uncertainty as Visa Options Dwindle

March 11, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Indian students on Optional Practical Training (OPT) in the U.S. are caught in a difficult situation as visa sponsorships become harder to secure. With H-1B visa chances declining and companies increasingly reluctant to sponsor foreign workers, many are left scrambling for alternatives. The uncertainty has led some to consider leaving the U.S. before their OPT expires, but the possibility of returning without complications remains unclear.

In an effort to legally extend their stay, some students have applied for a second degree to obtain another F-1 visa after their OPT ends. However, this path is risky, as a rejected F-1 visa application could result in being denied re-entry into the U.S. Further complicating matters, American immigration rules impose restrictions on students beginning a new academic program. Even if their previous F-1 visa remains valid, they are often not allowed to re-enter the U.S. more than 30 days before the start of their new classes.

The situation becomes even more precarious for those who overstay their visa. Remaining in the U.S. beyond the authorized period can jeopardize future F-1 and H-1B approvals. Meanwhile, hope for securing an H-1B visa is fading, as many OPT workers report that their employers are refusing to sponsor applications this year. Some are exploring self-petition options, but many find themselves forced to pursue another degree simply to maintain their legal status.

For thousands of Indian students in the U.S., this has turned into a distressing ordeal. The intricate visa system, combined with rigid immigration policies, is making it increasingly difficult for them to stay in the country. As their options diminish, they are left navigating a system that offers few clear solutions and significant risks.

India-U.S. Academic Ties Strengthened Through Virtual Mentoring Series ‘MARG’

March 9, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The Embassy of India in Washington, D.C., in collaboration with the Ministry of Education, the University Grants Commission, and the Department of Agricultural Research and Education of India, has launched the second round of the virtual mentoring series ‘MARG’ – Mentoring for Academic Excellence and Research Guidance. This initiative aims to connect Indian-origin faculty from U.S. universities with students and researchers from Indian universities, according to an official press release.

“This endeavor connects Indian universities across regions with top U.S. universities. Students and researchers will get exposure to latest developments, research and innovation, and skilling opportunities from Indian origin professors in the U.S.,” the release stated.

Faculty of Indian origin from prestigious U.S. institutions such as Stanford University, Purdue University, the University of Maryland, and George Mason University are participating in this series.

During the launch of the second round on March 7, Deputy Chief of Mission Ambassador Sripriya Ranganathan emphasized the growing ties between India and the U.S. in academic, research, innovation, and industrial sectors, particularly in critical and emerging technologies. She credited the leadership of both nations for driving this collaboration forward.

The MARG series plays a significant role in fostering the exchange of ideas and providing guidance on global educational and research opportunities, particularly in technology-related fields such as artificial intelligence, semiconductors, biotechnology, cybersecurity, and agricultural technology.

Expressing gratitude to Indian-origin professors in the U.S. for their contributions to the initiative, Ranganathan encouraged them to maintain connections with Indian universities beyond this series. She also urged them to engage more frequently with faculty and researchers, and to take advantage of Indian government programs such as SPARC, VAIBHAV, and GYAN to visit India for collaborations in research, innovation, skilling, and educational exchanges.

Leaders from participating Indian universities, including directors and vice-chancellors, emphasized that these sessions would greatly benefit students and faculty involved in teaching, skilling, and research in critical and emerging technologies.

Kerala’s Higher Education Crisis: Brain Drain, Student Migration, and the Need for Reform

March 6, 2025March 6, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Last year, a journalist friend of mine who teaches at St. Teresa’s College, Ernakulam, asked if I knew anyone interested in enrolling in the journalism program. This question felt unusual, considering the college’s past reputation when only top-ranking students or those with strong connections could secure admission.

Today, many reputed institutions are advertising their courses in leading newspapers, aggressively promoting their programs. This issue is not confined to a single institution or field of study; rather, it highlights the broader crisis affecting higher education in Kerala.

Student Migration Surge

The Kerala Migration Survey, conducted every five years, shows that student migration has doubled post-COVID-19. While students from Kerala have traditionally gone abroad for higher education, the motivation has changed. Earlier, they pursued degrees with plans to return, but now, most are leaving permanently. This is alarming for a state with one of the lowest fertility rates in India.

While migration to Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries has declined, emigration to Western nations has significantly increased. A recent edition of The Hindu’s Kochi publication, which featured a supplement on the Invest Kerala Global Summit, also carried a large ‘Study Abroad’ advertisement, illustrating the state’s paradox.

Kerala’s Struggle to Adapt

Kerala, once a leader in various sectors, struggled to adapt to economic liberalization. Marxist ideology traditionally viewed private capital and wealth creation with skepticism. Initially, student migration was mostly to neighboring South Indian states, but over time, both youth and capital started moving abroad.

It took over three decades for the Left to acknowledge the problem. Only in 2024 did the state budget finally announce its acceptance of private universities. However, this policy change may have come too late.

The rapid growth of ‘Study Abroad’ consultancies, even in small towns, reflects the increasing number of students seeking overseas education. Unlike the previous generation, which moved abroad for specialized courses after graduation and often returned, today’s students are leaving immediately after school, primarily seeking countries that offer permanent residency (PR).

This trend signals not only a decline in the quality of education within the state but also a lack of job opportunities and insufficient resource allocation by successive governments. The Marxist influence, which relied heavily on the public sector, has played a significant role in this decline.

It may surprise some to learn that the Left once opposed the introduction of computers and tractors in Kerala. Their resistance to the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model proposed by K. Karunakaran, along with efforts to block the Express Highway project in the early 2000s, further hindered progress. By the time they recognized these missteps, the damage was already done.

Demographic and Sociological Consequences

Beyond brain drain, Kerala faces serious demographic and sociological challenges. Unlike Gulf migration, which provided substantial remittances and saw workers returning home, the current trend of youth emigration is concentrated in central Kerala districts like Pathanamthitta, Idukki, and Kottayam. Many young people leave elderly parents behind, starting new lives abroad.

This issue is particularly concerning given that Pathanamthitta (-3%) and Idukki (-1.8%) reported negative population growth rates in the 2011 census. Kerala is steadily becoming a geriatric society. Some parents eventually follow their children abroad, often as babysitters, leaving behind properties that either remain unused or are sold at low prices. This has led to declining land values in central Kerala.

Many settlements in central Travancore are at risk of becoming ghost towns with abandoned houses. The 2011 census reported that 11% of Kerala’s 10 million houses were vacant. By 2019, this had risen to 14%—double the national average—and has likely increased further post-COVID.

A survey by the Kerala Academy of Sciences found that seven out of ten students who leave Kerala for higher studies either have no plans to return or are undecided.

Addressing the Brain Drain

There is no simple solution to Kerala’s brain drain, but job creation is the first step. The state has a large, aspirational middle class that frequently mortgages property to send children abroad.

Land reforms in Kerala, which disrupted the agricultural economy, were a turning point for wealth redistribution. However, small landholdings, high labor costs, and stagnant agricultural prices have made farming unsustainable.

Government job opportunities are limited. Kerala already has an overstaffed bureaucracy, with many redundant positions. However, due to trade union pressures, the government struggles to reallocate personnel. Additionally, Kerala has heavily borrowed in recent years, straining state finances and reducing capital expenditure.

Sectors like tourism could significantly boost the economy if the government played a facilitative role by investing in basic infrastructure such as highways and civic facilities. The neglected state of Fort Kochi beach and Alappuzha illustrates Kerala’s failure to support a high-potential revenue-generating industry. Tourism remains a vital sector that can drive employment and economic growth, even during economic downturns.

Some argue that Kerala’s fragile ecosystem and dense population, with 44 rivers, make it unsuitable for heavy industries. While this may justify missing out on industrialization, the state has also failed to capitalize on the service sector boom over the past three decades, despite having a skilled workforce.

Although Kerala established Technopark during the early years of economic liberalization, it failed to maximize its potential, allowing Bengaluru to dominate the IT industry. Unlike cities such as Chennai, Hyderabad, or Bengaluru, Kerala lacks a major metropolis, but the IT sector, which has largely avoided trade union disruptions, could still absorb a significant portion of the state’s graduates.

Despite being a major consumer market for automobiles, Kerala has not attracted any major vehicle manufacturers. In 2004, when German automaker BMW sought a meeting with then-Chief Minister Oommen Chandy, a statewide strike forced the cancellation. When a second meeting was also disrupted, BMW chose Tamil Nadu instead.

Revamping the Education System

Before improving the business climate, Kerala must first resolve its educational crisis, starting at the school level. Recently, the Director of General Education criticized the practice of automatically promoting students regardless of academic performance, pointing out that many lack basic literacy skills.

Kerala’s private engineering colleges are in steep decline. During the early 2000s boom, there were 167 professional colleges in the state; today, that number has dropped to 90, with many on the verge of closure. Meanwhile, students from Kerala continue to seek medical and nursing admissions in other states due to a shortage of seats at home.

The Kerala state board’s tendency to inflate student grades even prompted Delhi University (DU) to modify its admission criteria to ensure fairness. Consequently, enrollment of Kerala students at DU significantly declined. Additionally, high-profile incidents of student politics and ragging in Kerala have only pushed more students to leave the state.

A study by the Centre for Public Policy Research found that 78% of female students migrating abroad do so in search of a more inclusive society, better lifestyle, and freedom from social stigmas. Policymakers only started addressing this issue when it became evident that youth were choosing foreign shores over Kerala.

For the Left, maintaining campus politics serves a vested interest, as college students continue to replenish the party’s ranks. However, Kerala’s universities, which should be fostering intellectual growth, have instead become strongholds of Marxist ideology, often stifling critical thinking.

The Path Forward

Kerala must modernize its educational curriculum and involve industry stakeholders to ensure graduates have better employment prospects. Violent student politics and the excessive unionization of academia—reducing faculty members to political pawns—must be curbed.

Only then can Kerala hope to reverse this trend. The crucial question remains: who will take the bold step to bring about these reforms? If no action is taken, the exodus will continue unchecked.

Indian Students Face Rising Costs as Rupee Weakens Against US Dollar

March 2, 2025March 2, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

With the Indian rupee continuing its decline against the US dollar, students from India planning to study abroad are facing increasing financial hurdles. Recently, the rupee crossed the 87-mark against the dollar, making it more expensive for students heading overseas for higher education.

Adding to their concerns, US President Donald Trump’s anti-immigration policies have unsettled many students who aspire to settle in the United States after completing their studies. Given that a large number of Indian students invest substantial amounts in their education in the US with long-term settlement in mind, these policy changes are causing anxiety among them.

Over the past month, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has intervened in the foreign exchange market to curb the rupee’s decline. While these efforts have helped strengthen the rupee by about one per cent against the dollar, the currency still remains nearly five per cent weaker than its value a year ago.

As a result, students heading to the US or other Western nations this year will need to pay significantly more in Indian rupees to cover tuition and living expenses.

A decline of 5 per cent in one year

According to Investing.com data, the US dollar was valued at approximately ₹82.87 against the Indian rupee a year ago. As of February 25, the dollar is trading at ₹87.089 per unit, marking a depreciation of over five per cent in just one year.

Studying in the US comes with a hefty price tag, typically ranging between $60,000 and $100,000 annually. In addition, students must account for living expenses, which can amount to another $20,000 per year.

This means that the overall annual cost of studying in the US is around $80,000. With the current exchange rate, this translates to ₹69.67 lakh instead of ₹66 lakh, an increase of ₹3.67 lakh per year. For a two-year program, this additional expense doubles to ₹7.34 lakh.

Larger budgets required

Financial experts are advising students and their families to prepare for higher expenses this year, not just for tuition fees but also for accommodation and other living costs. They also recommend hedging against currency fluctuations by diversifying investments.

“The depreciation of the Indian rupee significantly impacts the cost of studying abroad, making tuition fees, living expenses, and other expenditures more expensive in rupee terms. For instance, if the rupee weakens against the US dollar or other major currencies, students have to allocate a higher budget for education expenses by compromising on retirement or other goals, increasing the financial burden,” says Rozy Efzal, Co-founder of Invest4edu.

She further advises, “Parents and students must proactively hedge against currency risks by investing in such assets as mutual funds and foreign currency deposits.”

Indian Students in the U.S. Face Job Struggles Amid Visa Uncertainty

February 28, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

India recently became the leading source of international students in the U.S., marking a significant milestone. However, this achievement feels hollow for many young graduates struggling to secure stable employment. A recent social media discussion has highlighted growing concerns among Optional Practical Training (OPT) candidates. A recruiter disclosed that their company’s legal team had advised against hiring OPT and TN visa holders due to immigration uncertainties.

Responding to this revelation, several recruiters from different companies acknowledged that while they had previously hired student visa candidates, they were now pausing this practice. Surprisingly, companies are still open to H-1B transfers, but OPT candidates are finding themselves shut out of job opportunities. The primary reason behind this shift is the unpredictability of the H-1B lottery. Employers are hesitant to take on the risk in a politically volatile environment, where visa policies could change unexpectedly.

As the U.S. adopts an increasingly restrictive stance on work visas, Indian graduates are now being viewed as a liability by employers. Some even argue that eliminating OPT and H-1B visas helps maintain higher wages for American workers. This trend could have devastating consequences for more than 300,000 Indian students in the U.S. Without a job offer, they cannot secure an H-1B visa, leaving them with no choice but to leave the country upon completing their studies.

IISc Tops Indian Institutions in THE World Reputation Rankings 2025, Harvard Retains Global Lead

February 23, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Indian Institute of Science (IISc) has emerged as the top-ranked institution in India, securing a position between 201-300 in THE World Reputation Rankings 2025. IISc has achieved an overall score ranging from 26.9 to 34.2. Following closely, the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi and IIT Madras have also been ranked in the 201-300 range, making them the next best institutions in the country. These two institutions share the same overall score bracket of 26.9-34.2. Meanwhile, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan has secured the fourth position in India based on the prestige rankings in THE World Reputation Rankings 2025.

For the 14th consecutive year, Harvard University has topped THE World Reputation Rankings. Close behind, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the University of Oxford have secured second place, while Stanford University and the University of Cambridge share the fourth position.

The University of Oxford has achieved the highest reputation ranking for a UK institution in a decade. This development indicates that its academic prestige is beginning to align with its consistent performance in global rankings.

Among the top 10 universities, Ivy League institutions Princeton University and Yale University have secured the seventh and ninth positions, respectively. Additionally, China’s Tsinghua University has been placed eighth, while Japan’s The University of Tokyo ranks 10th. The University of Tokyo has significantly improved its position, climbing 18 places from its previous 28th rank in global university rankings.

For the first time, THE World Reputation Rankings 2025 has incorporated six performance indicators to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of university reputations. This approach reflects the growing significance of academic reputation among the global academic community.

Several universities have newly entered the top 50 most prestigious institutions worldwide. Among them are LMU Munich, KU Leuven, Sorbonne University, the University of Melbourne, the University of Hong Kong, and the University of Manchester. Additionally, four new countries—Chile, Malaysia, Poland, and Portugal—have made their debut in THE World Reputation Rankings this year.

Harvard Tops THE World Reputation Rankings for 14th Straight Year

February 20, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Harvard University has once again secured the top position in the Times Higher Education (THE) World Reputation Rankings, maintaining its dominance for the 14th consecutive year. Close behind, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the University of Oxford have tied for second place, while Stanford University and the University of Cambridge share the fourth spot.

The University of Oxford’s strong showing marks the highest reputation ranking for a UK institution in the past decade. This rise suggests that Oxford’s prestige for academic excellence is finally aligning with its overall performance.

Among the top 10 institutions, Ivy League members Princeton University and Yale University secured the seventh and ninth positions, respectively. Additionally, China’s Tsinghua University ranked eighth, and Japan’s University of Tokyo made a significant leap, ranking 10th—18 places higher than its 28th position in the overall world rankings.

Several universities have made their way into the top 50 most influential academic institutions. These include LMU Munich, KU Leuven, Sorbonne University, the University of Melbourne, the University of Hong Kong, and the University of Manchester. Moreover, four new countries—Chile, Malaysia, Poland, and Portugal—have made their debut in THE World Reputation Rankings this year.

The top 10 universities in THE Rankings are as follows:

Harvard University – United States

Massachusetts Institute of Technology – United States

University of Oxford – United Kingdom

Stanford University – United States

University of Cambridge – United Kingdom

University of California, Berkeley – United States

Princeton University – United States

Tsinghua University – China

Yale University – United States

The University of Tokyo – Japan

The 2025 edition of THE World Reputation Rankings incorporates six performance indicators for the first time. This change aims to offer a more comprehensive evaluation of institutional reputation and reflects the increasing importance of reputation within the academic community.

Harvard Tops World University Reputation Rankings 2025 for 14th Consecutive Year

February 20, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The Times Higher Education (THE) has released the World University Reputation Rankings 2025, with Harvard University once again claiming the top spot. This marks the 14th year in a row that Harvard has led the rankings. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the University of Oxford follow in joint second place, making Oxford the highest-ranked UK university in the reputation rankings since 2015.

The rankings evaluate universities based on their perceived academic excellence, as judged by leading scholars across the globe. The assessment offers valuable insights into how institutions are regarded internationally in terms of their research and teaching quality.

Top 10 Universities in the World University Reputation Rankings 2025

Harvard University (United States) – 99.9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (United States) – 99.7
University of Oxford (United Kingdom) – 99.7
Stanford University (United States) – 99.6
University of Cambridge (United Kingdom) – 99.6
University of California, Berkeley (United States) – 98.7
Princeton University (United States) – 95.1
Tsinghua University (China) – 92.2
Yale University (United States) – 91.8
The University of Tokyo (Japan) – 90.7

In addition to securing the top overall position, Harvard is also tied for first place in a new measure assessing voter diversity, alongside Oxford and Cambridge. This further reinforces its influence on a global scale. Oxford’s move to joint-second is particularly notable, as it aligns with its dominance in the overall THE World University Rankings, where it has maintained the number one position for the past nine years.

Meanwhile, Tsinghua University continues to hold onto its eighth-place ranking, remaining the top-ranked institution from China and Asia.

This year’s rankings highlight a more diverse global representation, with universities from various regions gaining recognition. Several institutions, including LMU Munich, KU Leuven, Sorbonne University, the University of Melbourne, the University of Hong Kong, and the University of Manchester, have made it into the top 50 most influential university brands.

Moreover, the 2025 rankings mark the inclusion of ten new countries that were not represented in the previous year’s rankings. Among them, Chile, Malaysia, Poland, and Portugal have made their debut, reflecting the expanding global reach of higher education institutions.

How Are the THE World University Reputation Rankings Determined?

The methodology behind the World University Reputation Rankings 2025 has been refined to provide a more in-depth evaluation of institutional prestige. This year, the rankings incorporate a more extensive set of assessment criteria to better capture the global academic landscape.

Three main factors determine the rankings: vote counts, pairwise comparison, and voter diversity. The vote count measures how many votes an institution receives for its research and teaching excellence. The pairwise comparison method ensures that scholars consider a broader range of institutions when casting their assessments. Meanwhile, voter diversity plays a critical role by rewarding universities that receive recognition from a wide range of geographical regions and academic disciplines.

Gautam Adani Unveils India’s Largest Skill and Employment Initiative with Singapore’s ITEES

February 17, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Adani Group Chairman Gautam Adani has announced India’s largest skill and employment initiative in collaboration with ITE Education Services (ITEES) of Singapore.

“Delighted to announce one of India’s largest Skill & Employ initiatives! In partnership with Singapore’s ITEES, the global leader in technical training, the Adani Group is launching the world’s largest finishing school in Mundra. This state-of-the-art facility will blend AI-driven immersive learning with cutting-edge innovation centres, and annually train over 25,000 learners to help accelerate the Make in India movement,” Gautam Adani posted on X.

The Adani Group has partnered with ITEES to establish a network of ‘Schools of Excellence’ aimed at catering to key industries, including Green Energy, Manufacturing, Hi-tech, Project Excellence, and Industrial Design. These schools, known as the Adani Global Skills Academy, will be funded by a donation of over ₹2,000 crore from the Adani family. The institutions will select students from technical and vocational education backgrounds across India to align with industry requirements.

Upon completion of their certification, students will have job opportunities within the Adani Group and across the industry, depending on their field of training. According to the company, the program is designed to produce professionals who are “first-day, first-hour industry ready and benchmarked to global standards of excellence.”

In the initial phase of the initiative, the world’s largest finishing school for technical training will be set up in Mundra, Gujarat. This facility aims to train more than 25,000 students each year for various industry roles. Fresh graduates and diploma holders from ITIs or Polytechnics with vocational and technical qualifications will be eligible to enroll in an intensive boot camp experience offered by the school. ITEES Singapore will serve as the knowledge partner for this project.

Earlier, during his son Jeet Adani’s wedding, Gautam Adani pledged ₹10,000 crore for various social causes, including infrastructure development in healthcare, education, and skill training. Additionally, Adani plans to contribute ₹6,000 crore toward building two integrated health campuses, Adani Health Cities (AHCs), in Ahmedabad and Mumbai, as reported by ANI.

Indian Students in the US Fear Tightening of OPT Program Amid Political Scrutiny

February 13, 2025February 14, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Indian students and professionals in the United States are growing increasingly concerned about the potential tightening of the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, which serves as a crucial avenue for gaining work experience and transitioning to H-1B visas. Ongoing political debates have led to criticisms that the program is unfair to American workers, leaving thousands of Indian students uncertain about their career prospects.

The Optional Practical Training (OPT) and Curricular Practical Training (CPT) programs have long played an essential role for international students on F-1 visas, providing opportunities for work experience. During the 2022-2023 academic year, around 69,000 Indian students participated in the OPT program. However, recent policy discussions and the legacy of former President Donald Trump’s stricter immigration stance have put the future of these programs at risk.

Understanding OPT and CPT

OPT permits students to work in the U.S. either before or after graduation, granting 12 months of work authorization. Those in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields can apply for a 24-month extension, bringing their total work authorization period to 36 months.

CPT, on the other hand, is tailored for work experiences that are directly tied to a student’s coursework. It allows part-time or full-time employment but comes with a critical restriction—students who complete more than 12 months of full-time CPT become ineligible for OPT.

Both programs require formal approval. While universities oversee the initial process through their Designated School Officials (DSOs), OPT participants must also secure authorization from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

Increased Scrutiny on OPT and CPT

During a U.S. House Judiciary Committee hearing on January 22, 2025, Jessica M. Vaughan, Director of Policy Studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, criticized both OPT and CPT, claiming they lack congressional authorization and are exploited by diploma mills that issue fraudulent work permits. “They should be eliminated or much more closely regulated,” Vaughan stated, emphasizing that these programs have contributed to the growth of the largest guest worker population in the U.S., with approximately 540,000 former students working under minimal oversight.

Concerns over the impact on American workers have also driven legal challenges. In 2022, the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers (WashTech) filed a lawsuit arguing that OPT enables employers to sidestep the H-1B visa cap, ultimately disadvantaging U.S. workers.

Adding to the scrutiny, instances of fraud and security risks have heightened calls for reform. In 2016, U.S. authorities created the fictitious University of Northern New Jersey to expose fraudulent CPT users. Jon Feere, former chief of staff at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), has since highlighted multiple concerns regarding the program’s oversight.

The Issue of No Cap on OPT

The sheer scale of participation in these programs is noteworthy. In the fiscal year 2023, 539,382 foreign students were employed under OPT, STEM OPT, and CPT combined. Unlike the H-1B visa program, which is subject to an annual cap, these programs have no numerical limitations. The breakdown includes 276,452 students under OPT, 122,101 under STEM OPT, and 140,829 under CPT.

Proposed policy changes aim to introduce stricter regulations. Vaughan has suggested implementing stronger oversight on educational institutions that issue visa paperwork, advocating for the revocation of certifications for schools with high student overstay rates. Feere has proposed limiting OPT to fields where practical training is essential for all students, not just international ones, ensuring that the program maintains its educational purpose rather than turning into a source of inexpensive labor.

Pushback from Universities and Tech Industry

Universities have resisted these potential restrictions, arguing that OPT is crucial for attracting international students, who collectively contribute billions of dollars to the U.S. economy. Institutions such as the University of California, Berkeley, actively support OPT as a valuable tool for students to gain real-world experience, enhancing their professional development.

Additionally, leading technology companies—including Google, Microsoft, and Amazon—rely heavily on the OPT program to recruit international talent for roles in software engineering, data science, and product management. These companies value the diverse skill sets and perspectives that international students bring to the workforce, further reinforcing the argument for maintaining the program.

With the future of OPT and CPT under increasing political scrutiny, Indian students in the U.S. are left in a state of uncertainty, hoping that policy decisions will continue to support their career aspirations while addressing broader economic and workforce concerns.

AAPI – MSRF Organizes MSRF & PreMed Medical Scholars Summit

February 3, 2025 Ajay GhoshEducation, Health 0

“The American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin, AAPI – MSRF organized a highly successful annual MSRF & Premed Medical Scholars Summit at the Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ from January 25-26, 2025,” Dr. Satheesh Kathula, President of AAPI, announced here today.

Organized by a team of young Medical Students and Residents of Indian origin, the Medical Scholars Summit was planned and organized by an MSRF Executive Board, led by Priya Uppal, President of MSRF; Priyanka Kolli, President-Elect; Sohi Mistry, Vice President; Priyal Shah, Treasurer; and Drishti Patel, Secretary of MSRF.

The MSRF & PreMed Medical Scholars Summit was led by an Executive Board comprising of Manan Pancholy, President; Rohan Chopra, Vice President; Prerak Shah, Secretary; Arjun Gangasani, Treasurer.

The AAPI – MSRF is a national organization representing medical, dental, and podiatry students and resident physicians of Indian origin in North America, founded with the objective of providing a channel of networking, support, and open communication among its members.

According to Dr. Priya A. Uppal, AAPI MSRF President 2024-2025, “We had over 100 attendees at the two-day event, with highlights that included our residency and fellowship panel – where attendees had the opportunity to ask questions directly of these program directors from a variety of surgical and non-surgical specialties, our medical school admissions Q&A from the Dean of Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and an MCAT advice lecture from a 520+ scorer.”

This year, the event had High School attendees encouraging young scholars to start their pre-medical journeys early. The research symposium, consisting of oral and poster presentations and arts and humanities, was excellent. There was cutting-edge research and parent AAPI judges who provided informative and insightful feedback to propel our students’ research forward.

“The 2-day-long Summit was packed with academic sessions that were interactive, with participants having an opportunity to actively engage in discussions and enhance their knowledge on a wide range of topics relevant to Medical Students and Residents, who seek guidance on ways to pursue their careers most effectively,” said Dr. Sunil Kaza, Chair of APPI BOT.

Scientific Research Symposium Oral Presentations, Mentorship and Networking Lunch; Residency Program Directors’ Panel, Medical School Admissions Panel, Fellowship Program Directors’ Panel; MCAT Success: Tips and Tricks were some of the exciting topics that were appreciated by the participants at the Summit.

On January 25, the Summit began with a session on Leadership in Medicine by Mihir Gupta, MD, while the session on Public Health Practice in Medicine was presented by Jaya Satagopan, PhD. Novel Technologies in Orthopedic Surgery was presented by Selene Parekh, MD, MBA. Functional Medicine was jointly presented by Subbarao Bollepalli, MD, & Chanakya Bavishi, DO.

Niraj Kothari, MD presented his insightful session on Pioneering Advanced Practices in Medicine, while Deepen Modi offered insights on Financial Wellness. Samir Pancholy, MD led a session on Service Project Pursuing Graduate Medical Education. Global Medicine and India: Lessons, Opportunities, and Challenges for the Next Generation of Physicians was presented by Dr. Kumar Belani, MD.

As the President-Elect of AAPI, the largest ethnic medical organization in the United States, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty said, “I strongly believe that acquiring new knowledge is crucial for professionals, especially for the physicians in a changing healthcare environment. This Medical Scholars Summit provided insights on pursuing a career and how best to utilize the resources and, help out next generation of Physicians of Indian origin achieve their goals.”

The Honorable Judges Panel at the Medical Summit consisted of: Dr. Satheesh Kathula, Hematology-Oncology; Dr. Sunil Kaza, Interventional Cardiology; Dr. Raj Bhayani, Otolaryngology; Dr. Arunabh Talwar; Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine; Dr. Sumul Raval, Neuro-oncology; Dr. Zeeshan Mansuri, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; and, Dr. Kinjal Solanki, Infectious Disease.

Dr. Meher Medavaran, Vice President of AAPI said, “Since its inception in 1982, AAPI has been at the forefront, representing a conglomeration of practicing of Indian origin physicians in the United States, seeking to be the united voice for the physicians of Indian origin. We serve every 7th patient in the US. We are proud of our achievements and our contributions to the healthcare industry and the millions of people we serve.”

Dr. Raj Bhayani, Secretary of AAPI pointed out that, “In addition to several programs in the United States and in India, AAPI has been in the forefront, advocating for the interests of the medical fraternity and organizing regular CME programs, health & wellness events, and financial workshops for its members and outreach, public health education, and advocacy activities for the community both locally and internationally.”

According to Dr. Shirish Patel, Treasurer of AAPI, “AAPI is strong representing over 120,000 Indian American physicians, 130 local Chapters, who make up of 10% of total physicians in the US and nearly 50% of International Medical Graduates, rooted in every corner of the nation. AAPI’s mission has evolved in the past 45 years, adapting to the changing needs of our times.”

Dr. Uppal, while summarizing the annual event for young physicians, said, “Our summit is genuinely one of a kind, bringing together South Asian high schoolers, undergraduates, medical students, residents, fellows, and attendings. It offered a unique networking opportunities where our trainees get to connect with and learn from colleagues across different specialties and stages of their careers. We would like to extend a huge thank you to parent AAPI for their encouragement and support. We look forward to welcoming you at our next summit.”

Dr. Kathula, who has been an educator and mentor for medical students, said “My priority has been to engage the second-generation physicians and foster mentorship to ensure AAPI’s continued relevance and vitality.” Towards this end, AAPI is in the process of appointing a committee of accomplished academicians to help mentor young physicians from India and the United States, who are aspiring to get into residencies. Dr. Kathula said, “We will continue the noble mission and strengthen our efforts to make AAPI reach greater heights.” For more details about AAPI, please visit: www.appiusa.org

Indo-US Collaborated Workshop on Emergency Medical Care With Advanced Simulation And Artificial Intelligence Technology Held At Guntur Medical College, Andhra Pradesh

January 29, 2025 Ajay GhoshHealth, Education 0

The first Indo-US Collaborated Andhra Pradesh State Workshop on Emergency Medical Care (EMC) with Advanced Simulation and Artificial Intelligence Technology was organized at Guntur Medical College, Guntur in the state of Andhra Pradesh in India on January 27, 2025. Over 700 medical students, residents, faculty, and nurses attended the Program at the GMCANA Auditorium.

The 4-hour hands-on workshop with CME credit was organized by the Department of Emergency Medicine, Guntur Medical College, under the aegis of Dr. NTR University of Medical Sciences, Guntur Medical College & Government General Hospital, Guntur Medical College Alumni of North America (GMCANA) and Indian Medical Association, Guntur Branch.

The program was designed and directed by Dr.Vemuri S Murthy, a renowned Indo-US Resuscitation Medicine expert from the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, and an alumnus of Guntur Medical College.

Dr.Radhika Rani Chandra, Professor and Head of the Department of Emergency Medicine at Guntur Medical College, was the workshop’s Coordinator and Indian Faculty Chair.

During the inauguration address, Dr. N.V. Sundara Chary, Principal and Additional Director of Medical Education at Guntur Medical College, Dr. S.S.V. Ramana, Medical Superintendent and Additional Director of Medical Education at Government General Hospital, Guntur, and Dr.Y.Subba Rayudu, President of the Indian Medical Association, Guntur, spoke about the importance of mandated resuscitation training in Medical Colleges and the promotion of community CPR Programs.

They welcomed the advanced Emergency Medical Care workshops with state-of-the-art simulation technology at Guntur Medical College and commended Dr.Vemuri Murthy’s decades of ongoing contributions to India in the field of Resuscitation Medicine. During her welcome address, Dr. Radhika Rani Chandra spoke about the advances made in Global Emergency Medical Care and the importance of conducting resuscitation workshops in all Medical Colleges.

Dr.Vemuri Murthy gave a presentation involving global advances in Emergency Medical Care and stressed the need for international collaborations in the healthcare sector to enhance outcomes of Heart Emergencies and Sudden Cardiac Arrests which are more prevalent among Indians and the Indian Diaspora.

The hands-on workshop, using advanced simulation technology was led by Dr. Vemuri Murthy and Dr.Radhika Rani Chandra, with the active participation of the faculty and residents. It was followed by AI-based Emergency Medical Care Case Management, with immersive technology, the newest technology to promote ” Excellence in Emergency Medical Care”.

Dr.Vemuri Murthy thanked the Program Committee and all the attendees for participating in the workshop conducted with Indo-US academic institutional participation. He commended the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, for initiating India-specific mandated EMC training in all Medical Colleges with “National Emergency Life-Support” (NELS) programs with dedicated Simulation Centers.

Dr.Radhika Rani Chandra thanked Dr.Vemuri Murthy, the members of the Organizing Committee, leadership of GMCANA,Drs.K. Rama Koteswara Rao,T.Ravikumar,V.Bala Bhaskara Rao and Laerdal Medical India for their help and support.

Indian Institute of Science Secures Spot Among Top 100 in Computer Science in THE World Rankings 2025

January 25, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The Times Higher Education (THE) has unveiled its World University Rankings 2025 by subject, marking a significant achievement for Indian academia. For the first time, an Indian institute has made it to the global top 100 institutions in the Computer Science category. The Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru, has clinched the 99th spot with a score of 60.5, improving its position from the previous year when it was placed in the 101–125 band in the 2024 rankings.

In the Engineering Subject Rankings 2025, institutions from the United States and the United Kingdom continue to dominate the top positions. Harvard University retains its premier position with an impressive overall score of 97.5. Stanford University follows closely in second place with a score of 96.4, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) ranks third with 96.2, and the University of Oxford is in fourth place with 96.1.

The rankings highlight excellence across 11 disciplines: Arts and Humanities, Business and Economics, Computer Science, Education Studies, Engineering, Law, Life Sciences, Medical and Health, Physical Sciences, Psychology, and Social Sciences. Notably, the United States leads in nine of these subject areas, while the United Kingdom claims dominance in the remaining two.

Other top-ranking institutions in Engineering include the University of California, Berkeley, which is ranked fifth with a score of 95.8. The University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom follows in sixth place, scoring 95.6. The California Institute of Technology takes the seventh spot with 95.5, and Princeton University secures the eighth position with a score of 94.5. The National University of Singapore, the only Asian institution in the top 10, ranks ninth with a score of 93.4, while ETH Zurich from Switzerland rounds out the top 10 with a score of 92.6.

Among Indian institutions featured in the Engineering rankings, Anna University is placed in the 251–300 range, scoring between 44.7 and 46.6. Lovely Professional University occupies a spot in the 301–400 band with scores ranging from 41.3 to 44.6. Meanwhile, Jamia Millia Islamia and Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences are both ranked in the 401–500 range, with scores falling between 38.3 and 41.2.

These rankings underscore the growing global recognition of Indian institutions, particularly in fields like Computer Science and Engineering, and highlight the continued dominance of universities from the United States and the United Kingdom in higher education.

AAPI – MSRF To Organize MSRF & PreMed Medical Scholars Summit

January 22, 2025January 22, 2025 Ajay GhoshHealth, Education 0

“The American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin, AAPI – MSRF has planned to organize our annual MSRF & PreMed Medical Scholars Summit at the Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ from January 25-26, 2025,” Dr. Satheesh Kathula, President of AAPI, announced here today.

Organized by a team of young Medical Students and Residents of Indian origin, the Medical Scholars Summit has been planned and is being organized by an MSRF Executive Board, led by Priya Uppal, President of MSRF; Priyanka Kolli, President-Elect; Sohi Mistry, Vice President; Priyal Shah, Treasurer; and Drishti Patel, Secretary of MSRF.

The MSRF & PreMed Medical Scholars Summit is led by an Executive Board comprising of Manan Pancholy, President; Rohan Chopra, Vice President; Prerak Shah, Secretary; Arjun Gangasani, Treasurer.

“The 2-day-long Summit will be packed with academic sessions that are interactive, with participants having an opportunity to actively engage in discussions and enhancing their knowledge on a wide range of topics relevant to Medical Students and Residents, who seek guidance on ways to pursue their careers in the most effective way,” said Dr. Sunil Kaza, Chair of APPI BOT.

Scientific Research Symposium Oral Presentations, Mentorship and Networking Lunch; Residency Program Directors’ Panel, Medical School Admissions Panel, Fellowship Program Directors’ Panel; MCAT Success: Tips and Tricks are some of the exciting topics that awai the participants at the Summit.

On January 25, the Summit will begin with a session on Leadership in Medicine by Mihir Gupta, MD, while the session on Public Health Practice in Medicine will be presented by Jaya Satagopan, PhD. Novel Technologies in Orthopedic Surgery will be presented by Selene Parekh, MD, MBA. Functional Medicine will be jointly presented by Subbarao Bollepalli, MD, & Chanakya Bavishi, DO.

Niraj Kothari, MD will present his insightful session on Pioneering Advanced Practices in Medicine, while Deepen Modi will offer insights on Financial Wellness. Samir Pancholy, MD will lead a session on Service Project Pursuing Graduate Medical Education. Global Medicine and India: Lessons, Opportunities, and Challenges for the Next Generation of Physicians will be presented by Dr. Kumar Belani, MD.

The Honorable Judges Panel at the Medical Summit consists of: Dr. Satheesh Kathula, Hematology-Oncology; Dr. Sunil Kaza, Interventional Cardiology; Dr. Raj Bhayani, Otolaryngology; Dr. Arunabh Talwar; Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine; Dr. Sumul Raval, Neuro-oncology; Dr. Zeeshan Mansuri, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; and, Dr. Kinjal Solanki, Infectious Disease.

As the President-Elect of AAPI, the largest ethnic medical organization in the United States, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty said, “I strongly believe that acquiring new knowledge is crucial for professionals, especially for the physicians in a changing healthcare environment. This Medical Scholars Summit will provide insights on pursuing career and how best to utilize the resources and, helping out next generation of Physicians of Indian origin achieve their goals.”

Dr. Kathula, who has been an educator and mentor for medical students, said “My priority has been to engage the second-generation physicians and fostering mentorship to ensure AAPI’s continued relevance and vitality.” Towards this end, AAPI is in the process of appointing a committee of accomplished academicians to help mentor the young physicians from India and the United states, who are aspiring to get into residencies. Dr. Kathula said, “We will continue the noble mission and strengthen our efforts to make AAPI reach greater heights.” For more details about AAPI, please visit: www.appiusa.org

MAGA Hardliners Target OPT Program Amid H1B Visa Debate, Impacting Indian Students and US Economy

January 19, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation, Immigration 0

MAGA hardliners are increasingly focusing their efforts on targeting the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, which allows international students, particularly those from India, to work in the United States after completing their studies. This issue has gained attention amid ongoing debates over the H1B visa, where Indian professionals are facing significant challenges due to the changes implemented during the Trump administration. As MAGA supporters set their sights on H1B visas, major adjustments to the OPT program are expected to follow.

The OPT program typically permits international students holding F-1 visas to stay in the US for 12 months after completing their first academic year. During this period, students can gain relevant work experience in their field of study. Students graduating with STEM degrees may be eligible for an extension of up to 36 months, allowing them to work in the US for an extended period. Critics argue, however, that while the OPT program was initially intended as a short-term opportunity for skill development and work experience, it has evolved into a significant route for international students to secure long-term immigration pathways. Many students are now opting for OPT as a shortcut to permanent employment in the US, bypassing more traditional immigration channels.

This growing trend has led to intensified scrutiny from MAGA nativists who oppose the OPT program, particularly as concerns over H-1B visas rise. MAGA supporters often contend that OPT is a temporary work permit rather than a long-term work visa. They argue that this short-term solution leaves international students, particularly those on OPT, desperate for H1B sponsorship, which in turn diminishes job opportunities for American graduates. These factors are among the primary reasons why Trump’s MAGA supporters have long opposed the OPT program, especially following the reforms to the H-1B visa system.

The immigration policy in the US, including provisions for the OPT program, has allowed international students to work for up to 36 months since its inception in 1947. Under current regulations, foreign nationals with an F-1 visa can participate in OPT and transition to an H1B visa. For many international students, particularly those from India, OPT is seen as a crucial opportunity to gain valuable work experience in the US economy, providing a stepping stone toward obtaining a green card and eventually US citizenship. Many F-1 students hope that their time in OPT will give them the necessary experience to secure long-term work visas.

In 2024, around 23% to 30% of F1 and M1 students were authorized to work through OPT, with 98-99% of the participants being F-1 visa holders. However, the future of the program is uncertain, as some MAGA critics are calling for its complete elimination. On the other hand, many supporters argue that OPT is essential for attracting top-tier international talent, which ultimately strengthens the US economy.

As MAGA hardliners increasingly target the H-1B visa program, OPT has come under increasing scrutiny. MAGA advocates insist that the OPT program should be canceled to protect job prospects for American graduates. If this happens, international students—particularly those from India—are expected to leave the US after completing their studies, without the opportunity to gain work experience in their chosen fields. The anticipated changes to the OPT program, driven by MAGA’s push against H1B visas, will likely reduce the number of students traveling to the US for higher education in the future.

The potential effects of MAGA’s focus on the OPT program could be far-reaching, especially for international students. One of the most significant outcomes is that these students will lose the chance to work in US-based companies upon graduation, a critical component of their career development. As a result, the appeal of US universities may decline, particularly among prospective international students. The reduction in international student enrollment could lead to fewer foreign students attending US universities in 2025.

International students have long been a vital part of the US economy, contributing significantly to the financial health of educational institutions. They pay higher tuition fees than domestic students, often two to three times as much. In fact, foreign students account for a substantial portion of the revenue generated by US universities. Eliminating the OPT program would not only diminish the opportunities for these students to gain work experience but would also have a detrimental effect on the US economy, which relies heavily on foreign student contributions.

As the OPT program faces potential changes under the scrutiny of MAGA’s influence on immigration policies, it is clear that the future of international student work opportunities in the US is uncertain. With the pressure on the H-1B visa system and calls to reduce foreign student immigration, the OPT program could become the next target for reform. If this occurs, it is likely that fewer international students will choose to study in the US, particularly those from countries like India, where the OPT program has provided a crucial pathway for gaining valuable work experience.

In conclusion, the MAGA movement’s opposition to the OPT program, as part of the broader debate surrounding H-1B visas, could have significant implications for both international students and the US economy. If the OPT program is abolished or severely restricted, it will not only impact the career prospects of foreign graduates but will also reduce the number of international students choosing to study in the US, potentially harming the educational system and the economy as a whole. It remains to be seen how these changes will unfold, but it is clear that the future of OPT and international student work opportunities in the US hangs in the balance.

India Tops as the Largest Sender of International Students to the US After 15 Years

January 19, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

For the first time in 15 years, India has surpassed other nations to become the largest source of international students in the United States, with over 3.3 lakh students currently enrolled in American institutions. This milestone was highlighted in the Open Doors Report 2024, released on Monday.

In the academic year 2022-23, China was the leading source of international students in the US, followed by India, as per a report by PTI. However, in the current academic year 2023-24, Indian student enrollment in the US has reached an all-time high of 3,31,602, representing a remarkable 23% increase from the previous year’s figure of 2,68,923.

“India is now the leading country of origin for international students in the United States, accounting for 29 percent of the total international student population,” stated a note from the US Embassy accompanying the report.

The Open Doors Report also revealed that the top five source countries for international students in the US for 2023-24 are India, China, South Korea, Canada, and Taiwan. While Indian students led the tally with 3,31,602 enrollments, China followed with 2,77,398 students. South Korea contributed 43,149 students, Canada had 28,998, and Taiwan accounted for 23,157.

The report highlighted India’s significant growth, stating, “India is the top sender of international students (for the first time since 2008/2009) with over 3,31,602 students studying in the United States. The number of Indian students is at an all-time high.”

The academic calendar in the US typically begins in September and concludes in May, a timeline that accommodates the large influx of international students.

A Leader in Graduate Enrollment

India maintained its position as the largest sender of international graduate students, encompassing those pursuing master’s and PhD programs, for the second consecutive year. The report noted a 19% increase in Indian graduate student numbers, bringing the total to 1,96,567.

Undergraduate enrollment by Indian students also saw growth, with a 13% rise to 36,053 students. However, non-degree programs, such as short-term exchange initiatives, witnessed a notable decline of 28%, with the number of students dropping to 1,426.

Celebrating International Education

The release of the Open Doors Report coincided with the start of International Education Week (IEW), an annual event that underscores the importance and benefits of international education and cultural exchange on a global scale.

The Open Doors Report is a long-standing publication by the Institute of International Education (IIE), an organization that has been conducting statistical surveys on international students in the US since its inception in 1919. Since 1972, this initiative has been carried out in collaboration with the US Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs.

This year’s findings not only underscore India’s growing presence in the US education system but also highlight the evolving trends in international education as a whole.

Oxford University Ranks First Among Billionaire-Producing British Universities

January 14, 2025January 16, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Not all universities are equal in terms of outcomes, and even Ivy League schools no longer guarantee a six-figure salary. However, one institution in England stands out for its potential to boost your chances of success after graduation: The University of Oxford.

A recent study by educational experts at Edumentors has identified the University of Oxford as the leading British institution for producing billionaires. The research analyzed the Forbes global billionaire list, focusing on individuals who pursued their bachelor’s, master’s, or PhD degrees in the United Kingdom.

Oxford has produced 10 billionaires whose collective wealth amounts to $47.1 billion. Among its notable billionaire alumni are Alex Beard and Sir Michael Jonathan Moritz.

Beard, one of Britain’s youngest billionaires with a net worth of approximately $1.8 billion, graduated from Oxford in 1989. He began his career at BP before joining Glencore, where he climbed to the position of CEO. In 2019, Beard departed Glencore to establish his investment firm, Adaptogen Capital.

Another prominent Oxford alumnus is Moritz, whose investments in companies such as Google, LinkedIn, and PayPal have helped him accumulate a net worth of $6.8 billion.

While Oxford boasts these billionaires, its famous alumni also include Emma Watson and Hugh Grant, although neither are billionaires.

Despite Oxford’s distinction as the top British billionaire-producing university, those aiming to achieve greater wealth might look to its historic rival, the University of Cambridge.

“Even though Oxford University has more billionaires among its alumni, Cambridge University, with two fewer magnates, comes out ahead and ranks first in terms of wealth, totaling an outstanding $92.6 billion, $45.5 billion more than its rival,” explained Tornike Asatiani, CEO of Edumentors.

This comparison underscores Cambridge’s financial dominance. With eight billionaires, Cambridge alumni collectively amass wealth comparable to Stanford University’s richest graduates. Notably, Stanford is the second-highest billionaire-producing university in the United States, despite having 12 more billionaires than Cambridge.

Across the Atlantic, American universities lead in terms of both the number of billionaires and their collective wealth. According to Forbes’ list of top colleges for billionaires (June 2024), the University of Pennsylvania is the top U.S. institution, with 36 billionaire alumni whose combined fortunes total $367 billion.

Following closely are Stanford University, with 30 billionaires worth $90 billion, and Harvard University, which has 28 billionaires amassing $261 billion. Yale University and Cornell University round out the top five with 19 and 13 billionaires, respectively, with combined wealths of $149 billion and $60.4 billion.

The rankings of billionaire-producing universities in Britain, as determined by Edumentors, are as follows:

University of Oxford
Number of billionaires: 10
Combined wealth: $47.1 billion
University of Cambridge

Number of billionaires: 8

Combined wealth: $92.6 billion

London School of Economics (LSE)

Number of billionaires: 8

Combined wealth: $37.8 billion

University of London

Number of billionaires: 4

Combined wealth: $9.6 billion

London Business School

Number of billionaires: 3

Combined wealth: $23.1 billion

In comparison, the top billionaire-producing universities in the U.S., as ranked by Forbes, include:

University of Pennsylvania

Number of billionaires: 36

Combined wealth: $367 billion

Stanford University

Number of billionaires: 30

Combined wealth: $90 billion

Harvard University

Number of billionaires: 28

Combined wealth: $261 billion

Yale University

Number of billionaires: 19

Combined wealth: $149 billion

Cornell University

Number of billionaires: 13

Combined wealth: $60.4 billion

These rankings reveal a stark contrast in the concentration of wealth between British and American universities, reflecting the significant influence of the U.S. on global billionaires. While British universities such as Oxford and Cambridge stand out for their historical prestige and influence, their American counterparts dominate in terms of sheer numbers and collective financial power.

For students aspiring to join the billionaire ranks, selecting a university may play a pivotal role. Both Oxford and Cambridge offer historical legacies and strong alumni networks, while institutions like Harvard and Stanford provide unparalleled opportunities and connections in the U.S. tech and business sectors.

Ultimately, the path to wealth and success is influenced by a mix of education, ambition, and opportunity, and these universities remain key platforms for ambitious individuals aiming to make their mark on the world.

Sweden Reintroduces Traditional Books in Schools After Digital-Only Education Experiment

January 12, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

In 2009, Sweden embarked on a bold journey to digitize its classrooms, aiming to revolutionize the way students learn. The government envisioned a future where computers and tablets would transform education into an interactive and accessible experience. By replacing traditional textbooks with digital alternatives, Sweden sought to make learning more dynamic while preparing students for the digital demands of the 21st century. Advocates of educational technology praised this move, considering it a forward-thinking approach to modern education.

Dr. Anna Lindström, an education expert at the Swedish National Institute of Education, stated, “The integration of digital tools was expected to enhance personalized learning and make education more dynamic.” The vision was clear: to equip students with the digital skills necessary for the modern workforce and foster an engaging, tech-savvy learning environment.

Challenges of Digital-Only Learning

Despite the initial optimism, the digital transition did not deliver the anticipated results. While Sweden maintained its high ranking in global education standards, studies and feedback from educators and parents revealed several challenges. One significant issue was the decline in essential skills such as reading and writing. Teachers noticed that students struggled to concentrate and retain information when using screens compared to traditional paper-based learning methods.

Research by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (Forte) supported these observations, finding that excessive screen time hindered students’ ability to focus and process complex information. “The impact of backlit screens on concentration and comprehension was far more significant than we anticipated,” noted Dr. Lindström.

Distractions from digital devices further compounded the problem. While computers and tablets were intended for learning, students often used them for gaming or browsing the internet during school hours, reducing classroom engagement. Many parents voiced their concerns about the unintended consequences of the digital shift. Maria Svensson, a mother, shared, “I noticed my child getting distracted by games and social media during school hours, which affected their academic performance.”

A Shift Back to Traditional Learning

Recognizing these challenges, Sweden has decided to reverse course and reintroduce traditional books in classrooms. From 2022 to 2025, the government will invest €104 million to provide every student with paper textbooks for each subject. The funds will also support awareness campaigns and assist schools during the transition.

“This move is about finding a balance,” said Education Minister Lena Johansson. “We’re not abandoning digital tools altogether, but rather ensuring that they complement rather than replace the foundational aspects of learning.”

The decision reflects the government’s understanding that while technology has its advantages, traditional teaching methods are vital for fostering critical thinking and comprehension skills. By reinstating books, Sweden hopes to rebuild fundamental learning skills while continuing to use digital tools where they can add value.

Dr. Erik Andersson, a curriculum developer, explained, “Books offer a tactile experience that screens simply cannot replicate. They help improve focus and enhance memory retention, which are essential for academic success.”

The Importance of Balance

Sweden’s decision to reintroduce books highlights the importance of balance in integrating technology into education. The country’s initial experiment showed that while digital tools can enhance learning, relying on them exclusively can lead to unintended consequences. The new approach aims to harmonize digital and traditional methods to create a more comprehensive educational experience.

Organizations like the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) have long advocated for such a balanced approach. They emphasize that technology should serve as a tool to enhance learning rather than dominate it. By revisiting its strategy, Sweden is setting a precedent for other nations on how to effectively integrate technology while preserving the benefits of traditional educational practices.

Conclusion

Sweden’s bold leap into digital-only education, followed by its decision to reintroduce traditional books, underscores the complexities of modernizing education. While the initial goal of embracing innovation was commendable, the outcomes revealed the importance of adapting policies to what truly benefits students. The €104 million investment to bring back books demonstrates a commitment to a holistic approach that values both tradition and innovation.

Dr. Lindström summarized the lesson well: “This experience shows that technology, while powerful, cannot replace the foundational aspects of education that have stood the test of time.” By striking a balance between digital and traditional methods, Sweden is paving the way for an education system that prepares students for both present challenges and future opportunities.

As the world continues to navigate the integration of technology into various sectors, Sweden’s experience offers a valuable lesson in the importance of flexibility, adaptability, and a balanced approach to educational policies.

The Top 8 College Majors with the Highest Starting Salaries

January 11, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

What you choose to study in college can significantly influence your potential earnings after graduation. Legacy Online School, an online K-12 school, analyzed data from the National Association of Colleges and Employers to determine which college degrees lead to the highest starting salaries for recent graduates. As expected, graduates with degrees in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields are typically the ones who earn the most as they enter the workforce.

According to the analysis, the following eight majors boast the highest average starting salaries for new college graduates.

Military Technology

Military Technology majors earn an average starting salary of $66,505. Graduates with this degree are often positioned to enter the defense and aerospace sectors, where technological advancements are key components of military operations. This can translate to high-paying positions, particularly in government or private sector roles that focus on national defense.

Business

Business majors receive an average starting salary of $66,578. The business field is broad, offering graduates a wide array of career paths, including roles in management, finance, marketing, and operations. Given the diverse skill sets business students develop, they often secure positions in a variety of industries, contributing to their relatively high entry-level salaries.

Transportation

Graduates who major in transportation report an average starting salary of $67,496. This major prepares students for careers in logistics, supply chain management, and transportation engineering. The increasing demand for efficient logistics and transportation systems, especially in industries like e-commerce, has fueled a steady need for qualified professionals, resulting in competitive starting salaries.

Engineering Technology

Engineering Technology majors start their careers with an average salary of $69,162. Engineering Technology students are trained to apply engineering principles in practical environments. This major includes areas like electrical, mechanical, and civil engineering technology. As industries seek skilled workers to bridge the gap between theory and real-world application, these graduates find themselves in high demand with strong starting pay.

Math

Graduates with a degree in mathematics can expect a mean starting salary of $79,859. The skills gained through a math degree are valuable across numerous fields, including finance, technology, data science, and research. As businesses and organizations increasingly rely on data-driven decision-making, math graduates are well-positioned to land lucrative roles in various sectors, boosting their earning potential.

Engineering

Engineering majors lead the pack with a mean starting salary of $80,085. Engineers have long enjoyed some of the highest salaries due to the technical expertise required in their fields. Whether in civil, mechanical, electrical, or other engineering disciplines, graduates are equipped with the knowledge to solve complex problems, which makes them highly sought after in industries ranging from construction to technology.

Maintenance & Repair

Maintenance & Repair majors boast an impressive average starting salary of $90,162. This major focuses on the skills needed to maintain and repair machinery, equipment, and systems in industries like manufacturing, utilities, and construction. The expertise of these graduates is crucial in maintaining operational efficiency, which explains their relatively high starting salaries compared to other non-engineering disciplines.

Computer & Information Science

Topping the list with an average starting salary of $91,411, graduates in Computer and Information Science are among the highest earners right out of college. With the increasing reliance on technology across all sectors, computer science and information technology professionals are in high demand. These graduates are typically well-prepared for roles in software development, cybersecurity, and data analysis, among others, making them highly valuable to employers looking for technical expertise.

If you’re looking for a major that will provide high earning potential, pursuing a STEM-related field can significantly boost your financial prospects upon graduation. Whether in technology, engineering, or mathematics, these areas continue to produce graduates who earn some of the highest starting salaries in the job market today.

Indian Universities Shine in Global Rankings Amid Mixed Progress

January 2, 2025January 4, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

As 2024 draws to a close, the global academic performance of Indian universities has come under the spotlight. The QS World University Rankings for 2025 and the Times Higher Education (THE) rankings reflect both achievements and areas for growth. These rankings underline the growing influence of Indian institutions on the global stage, showcasing steady advancements and notable breakthroughs.

Over the past five years, from 2021 to 2025, India’s academic institutions have made remarkable strides, with several universities achieving new milestones.

The Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) have demonstrated a strong upward trajectory in the QS World University Rankings. Among them, IIT Bombay has been the standout performer, improving its rank from 172 in 2023 to 118 in 2025. This steady climb underscores the institution’s growing reputation worldwide. Similarly, IIT Delhi has made significant gains, advancing from rank 197 in 2024 to 150 in 2025. This progress highlights the institution’s focus on research, innovation, and educational excellence.

QS Rankings
Institute	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IIT Bombay	118	149	172	177	172
IIT Delhi	150	197	174	185	193
IISc Bangalore	211	225	155	186	185
IIT Kharagpur	222	271	270	280	314
IIT Madras	227	285	250	255	275
IIT Kanpur	263	278	264	277	350
DU	328	407	521-530	501-510	501-510
IIT Roorkee	335	369	369	–	–
IIT Guwahati	344	364	384	395	470
Anna Univ	383	427	551-560	801-1000	801-1000

Other IITs, including IIT Madras and IIT Kanpur, have also improved their standings. IIT Kharagpur and IIT Guwahati have shown consistent progress, cementing their places in the rankings. The rise of these institutions highlights the broader commitment of IITs to enhancing their academic and research contributions.

Beyond the IITs, other Indian universities have also gained recognition. Delhi University (DU) recorded a significant improvement, jumping from the 521-530 range in 2023 to rank 328 in 2025. This leap reflects its increasing global influence and academic excellence. Similarly, Anna University has risen rapidly, moving from the 801-1000 range to rank 383 in 2025, underscoring its emphasis on quality research and education. These achievements represent a broader effort by Indian universities to align with global standards and attract international attention.

Indian higher education has seen dynamism with new entrants and institutions improving their standings. For example, IIT Roorkee made a significant debut in the QS rankings, entering the top 335 in 2025 after not being listed in earlier years. IIT Guwahati has also steadily risen, progressing from rank 470 in 2021 to 344 in 2025. These improvements reflect growing academic and research outputs from these institutions.

In the Times Higher Education (THE) rankings, IISc Bangalore has consistently performed well, maintaining a position in the top 300 over the years. From being in the 301-350 range in 2021, it climbed to the 251-300 range by 2025. However, not all institutions have shown positive trends. IIT Ropar, for instance, experienced a decline, dropping from the 351-400 range in 2021 to the 801-1000 range in 2025. IIT Gandhinagar and IIT Guwahati showed fluctuations, with the latter rising from the 1001+ range in 2021 to 601-800 in 2024 before slipping to 801-1000 in 2025.

Despite challenges, IIT Patna and IIT Indore maintained stable performances, consistently ranking in the 501-800 range. These varied performances highlight the diverse pace of development and competitiveness among the IITs.

However, the six older IITs—Bombay, Madras, Delhi, Roorkee, Kanpur, and Kharagpur—have been absent from the THE rankings since 2020. This boycott stemmed from concerns about the transparency of the ranking methodology.

THE World University Rankings Overall Category
Institute	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IISc Bangalore	251-300	201-250	251-300	301-350	301-350
Anna University	401-500	501-600	801-1000	1001+	1001+
Mahatma Gandhi University	401-500	501-600	401-500	401-500	401-500
Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences	401-500	601-800	501-600	801-1000	801-1000
Shoolini Biotechnology and Management Sciences	401-500	501-600	351-400	351-400	351-400
IIT Indore	501-600	601-800	601-800	401-500	401-500
Jamia Millia Islamia	501-600	501-600	501-600	601-800	601-800
Aligarh Muslim University	601-800	601-800	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000
Amity University, Noida	601-800	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000
Banaras Hindu University	601-800	601-800	601-800	601-800	601-800
BITS Pilani	601-800	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000
Chitkara University	601-800	1001+	1001+	1001+	1001+
IIT Patna	601-800	601-800	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000
International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad	601-800	601-800	501-600	601-800	601-800
KIIT University	601-800	601-800	601-800	801-1000	801-1000
Lovely Professional University	601-800	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000
Malviya Institute of Technology	601-800	601-800	Not Ranked	Not Ranked	Not Ranked
Panjab University	601-800	601-800	801-1000	601-800	601-800
Symbiosis International University	601-800	1001+	1001+	1001+	1001+
Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology	601-800	1001+	1001+	1001+	1001+
VIT University	601-800	601-800	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000
Alagappa University	801-1000	601-800	401-500	401-500	401-500
Bharathiar University	801-1000	601-800	401-500	401-500	401-500
Delhi Technological University	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000
IIT Gandhinagar	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000	601-800	601-800
IIT Guwahati	801-1000	601-800	1001-1200	1001-1200	1001+
IIT Ropar	801-1000	501-600	501-600	351-400	351-400
Institute of Chemical Technology	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000
Jamia Hamdard University	801–1000	601-800	601-800	801-1000	801-1000
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur (JNTUA)	801–1000	601-800	–	–	–
NIT Rourkela	801-1000	601-800	1001-1200	1001-1200	1001+
NIT Silchar	801-1000	601-800	601-800	801-1000	801-1000
NIT Tiruchirappalli	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000	801-1000

Meanwhile, the National Institutes of Technology (NITs) have also made strides in the THE rankings. NIT Rourkela advanced from the 1001+ range in 2021 to 601-800 in 2024, although it slipped back to the 801-1000 range in 2025. Similarly, NIT Silchar maintained stability within the 601-800 range in 2023 and 2024. On the other hand, NIT Tiruchirappalli has remained consistent in the 801-1000 bracket over the years.

Other Indian universities and colleges have displayed a mix of progress and stability in the THE rankings. Anna University and Mahatma Gandhi University have performed exceptionally well, securing positions in the 401-500 range in 2025. Shoolini University has consistently ranked in the 351-400 and 401-500 ranges, reflecting its strong emphasis on research.

Institutions like KIIT University, Jamia Millia Islamia, and Panjab University have maintained their positions in the 501-800 range, indicating a steady academic reputation. However, universities such as Lovely Professional University (LPU) and Delhi Technological University (DTU) have struggled to break out of the 801-1000 range. This highlights the need for these institutions to focus more on research output and global collaboration.

Despite encouraging progress by some, others face challenges in meeting global standards. This mixed performance underscores the evolving nature of Indian higher education and its efforts to compete internationally.

As 2024 ends, the growing presence of Indian universities in global rankings offers a reason for optimism. Institutions like IIT Bombay, Delhi University, and Anna University have set benchmarks for others to follow. While challenges remain, particularly in ensuring consistency and global competitiveness, the progress made over the past five years signals a promising future for Indian higher education.

This review of Indian universities’ performance reflects both their achievements and the hurdles they need to overcome as they continue striving for excellence on the global stage.

US Campuses on Edge Ahead of Trump’s Return: International Students Brace for Changes

December 29, 2024January 1, 2025 Staff ReporterEducation 0

As President-elect Donald Trump’s January 20 inauguration approaches, anxiety and uncertainty are growing across US college campuses. Many universities have urged international students to return early from winter break, fearing a repeat of the previous travel ban that left students stranded during Trump’s earlier term.

The United States, which hosted over 1.1 million international students in the 2023-24 academic year, could see renewed challenges for these students. Trump has promised stricter immigration measures, including an expanded travel ban targeting predominantly Muslim countries and plans to revoke visas for students deemed “radical anti-American and antisemitic.”

International students, who typically hold nonimmigrant visas allowing them to study but not reside permanently in the US, find themselves in a precarious position. “It’s a scary time for international students,” remarked Pramath Pratap Misra, a 23-year-old political science graduate from New York University (NYU). NYU had the nation’s largest population of international students last year, with over 27,000 enrolled.

Amid final exams and winter travel plans, students across the country are preparing for potential disruptions. Universities have cautioned against leaving the US before the inauguration, fearing new restrictions.

Cornell University’s Office of Global Learning has advised students to return before January 21, when spring classes begin. The office warned that “a travel ban is likely to go into effect soon after inauguration,” possibly affecting citizens from countries previously included in Trump’s first ban—such as Iran, Libya, and Syria—as well as potentially adding nations like China and India.

Similarly, the University of Southern California (USC), which has the highest number of international students in California, encouraged students to arrive by January 6. In an email, the USC Office of International Service said, “The safest way to avoid any challenges is to be physically present in the U.S. before the Spring semester begins.”

Trump’s proposed “mass deportations” have further amplified concerns, not just for workers in industries like agriculture and healthcare but also for students. While Trump has also suggested granting green cards to international graduates of US colleges, his campaign clarified that only “the most skilled graduates” would qualify. These individuals would undergo strict screenings to exclude “communists, radical Islamists, Hamas supporters, America haters, and public charges.”

For students like Gabrielle Balreira Fontenelle Mota, a 21-year-old Brazilian studying journalism and international relations at NYU, the uncertainty is unsettling. “I’m not from a Muslim country or from China, which are places that Trump usually criticizes,” she explained. “What makes me a little bit more concerned is the ideological screenings that he said he will be implementing.”

In response, NYU reassured its international community, emphasizing the importance of cross-border student mobility. “We will be monitoring any immigration-related proposals, laws, and actions that could be of concern to our community,” the university stated in a post-election email.

Other universities have also taken proactive measures. The University of Massachusetts Amherst has urged international students to return before the new administration takes office, citing “an abundance of caution.” The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) advised against relying on social media rumors when making travel decisions.

Meanwhile, Northeastern University, which has the second-largest international student body after NYU, suggested students return by January 6 to avoid disruptions. Harvard University echoed similar advice, urging students to budget time ahead of the semester start to mitigate risks.

For some, the looming challenges recall Trump’s first term, marked by efforts to restrict immigration across various categories. “The best way to anticipate or predict what will happen in the second Trump administration is to look at what happened in the first administration,” noted Stuart Anderson, executive director of the National Foundation for American Policy.

As universities brace for potential policy shifts, the fear of restrictive immigration measures weighs heavily on students and faculty alike, casting a shadow over the upcoming semester.

Canada Ends Flagpoling for Work and Study Permit Renewals

December 29, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Canada has officially terminated the practice of flagpoling at its ports of entry, effective December 23 at 11:59 p.m. ET. Temporary residents in Canada seeking to renew their work or study permits must now submit applications through Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC). This eliminates the previous option of briefly leaving and re-entering Canada for expedited processing, according to a statement from the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA).

Flagpoling, a strategy frequently employed by temporary residents to avoid long processing times, is no longer permitted. Canadian authorities have implemented this change to enhance border operations and enforcement. Public Safety Minister David McGuinty emphasized the benefits, stating, “This change will enable us to further streamline activities at our ports of entry and allow Canadian and American border officers to focus on what they have been expertly trained to do – border enforcement,” as quoted by CBC News.

Reasons Behind the Ban

Flagpoling has significantly strained resources for both Canadian and American border services. The CBSA processed over 69,300 flagpolers between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024, with the majority concentrated in the Pacific region, southern Ontario, and Quebec, according to CIC News.

The CBSA highlighted that border services are primarily designed for individuals entering Canada from abroad, not for those already in the country. Redirecting resources to handle flagpolers has created congestion and hindered vital border enforcement tasks.

Marc Miller, Canada’s Minister of Immigration, explained the rationale for the new policy, saying, “A strong Canada-US relationship keeps people and goods moving safely while protecting both sides of the border.” He added that the change aims to “enhance fairness, ease border congestion, and improve overall border efficiency.”

Limited Exemptions

While flagpoling is no longer allowed for most temporary residents, specific groups may still qualify for port-of-entry processing under certain conditions:

S. Citizens and Permanent Residents: Citizens or permanent residents of the United States are exempt from this restriction.
Free Trade Agreement Professionals and Technicians: Individuals covered by free trade agreements with countries like the United States, Mexico, Chile, Panama, Peru, Colombia, and South Korea, as well as their spouses or common-law partners, remain eligible.
International Truck Drivers: Truck drivers leaving Canada for work who held maintained status due to a timely renewal application are also exempt.
Pre-Scheduled CBSA Appointments: Applicants with pre-existing appointments for permit processing at CBSA offices will still be accommodated.

Those attempting to flagpole without meeting these criteria will be directed to use IRCC’s application system.

Policy Context

This policy shift reflects a broader strategy to strengthen Canada-US border security. In its fall economic update, the Liberal government allocated $1.3 billion over six years for initiatives such as drones, helicopters, and enhanced border monitoring. The changes also coincide with growing concerns over potential tariffs from the United States, further underscoring the need for robust border management.

By ending flagpoling, Canada prioritizes border efficiency and enforcement while urging temporary residents to utilize IRCC’s online services for work and study permit renewals. This move marks the end of flagpoling as a convenient but resource-intensive option for expedited immigration services.

ED Investigates Human Trafficking Involving Over 200 Canadian Colleges

December 25, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) announced on Tuesday that it is investigating the alleged involvement of more than 200 Canadian colleges in a human trafficking case. This revelation comes amid the agency’s probe into a well-coordinated scheme that exploited students for illegal immigration to the United States.

The ED’s Ahmedabad Zonal Office recently conducted search operations at eight locations, including Mumbai, Nagpur, Gandhinagar, and Vadodara, on December 10 and 19. These searches were carried out under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

In its statement on Tuesday, the ED clarified that the operations were part of an ongoing investigation into “Bhavesh Ashokbhai Patel and others [Dingucha case].” The case involves an elaborate conspiracy to traffic individuals to the United States through Canada using illegal channels. “Bank accounts containing approximately ₹19 lakh have been frozen, and various incriminating documents, digital devices, and two vehicles have been seized,” the statement added.

The investigation was initiated after a tragic incident on January 19, 2022, when a family of four Indian nationals from Dingucha village, Gujarat, was found dead near the Canada-US border. Following this, the Ahmedabad City Crime Branch registered an FIR against Bhavesh Ashokbhai Patel and others.

According to the ED, the accused conspired to lure innocent Indian nationals by charging exorbitant sums of ₹55-60 lakh per person for facilitating their illegal entry into the United States via Canada.

The ED explained that the accused arranged for individuals to secure admission in Canadian colleges or universities as part of the trafficking scheme. “The ED investigation revealed that for sending the Indian Nationals to the USA illegally, the accused arranged admission of the individuals in Colleges/Universities based in Canada and thereby applied for students’ visas for Canada,” the agency said.

However, the individuals would not attend the Canadian colleges upon arrival. Instead, they would use Canada as a transit point to cross into the United States illegally. The ED noted, “Once the individuals/students reach Canada, instead of joining the college, they illegally crossed the US-Canada border and never joined the college(s) in Canada.”

Further details revealed that the fees paid to Canadian colleges were refunded to the students’ accounts once they entered the United States. The agency disclosed that two entities in Mumbai and Nagpur collaborated with other organizations to arrange such admissions on a commission basis. “An entity, contacted by desirous students, facilitated admissions into foreign universities to aid in illegal immigration to the USA,” the ED stated.

The extent of the operation is vast, as revealed during the searches. According to the ED, approximately 25,000 students are referred annually to various colleges abroad by one entity, while another entity refers over 10,000 students per year.

The agency added that the network of agents involved in the scheme is widespread. “It is gathered that there are around 1700 agents/partners based in Gujarat and around 3500 agents/partners of other entities across India, with about 800 of them currently active,” the ED said.

Moreover, the investigation pointed to agreements between Canadian colleges and these agents. “Around 112 colleges based in Canada have entered into an agreement with one entity and more than 150 with another entity. Their involvement in the instant case is under investigation,” the statement concluded.

The ED continues to probe the depth of this operation, seeking to unravel the connections and ensure accountability for those exploiting individuals through such deceptive practices.

Biden Cancels $4.28 Billion in Student Debt for Public Service Workers

December 22, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

President Joe Biden announced on Friday the cancellation of student loans for an additional 55,000 Americans, totaling $4.28 billion in debt relief during his final month in office. This decision benefits individuals in public service roles, such as “teachers, nurses, service members, law enforcement officials, and other public service workers who have dedicated their lives to giving back to their communities,” Biden said in a statement from the White House.

This latest round of debt forgiveness brings the total number of beneficiaries under Biden’s administration to nearly 5 million people. “From Day One of my administration, I promised to make sure that higher education is a ticket to the middle class, not a barrier to opportunity,” Biden emphasized, underscoring his commitment to alleviating the financial burdens of education for Americans.

Education Secretary Miguel Cardona stated that Friday’s approval pushes the total amount of student debt relief granted during Biden’s tenure to approximately $180 billion. This sweeping effort has provided nearly five million borrowers with what Cardona described as “life-changing student debt relief.”

In 2022, Biden introduced a landmark forgiveness program aimed at canceling hundreds of billions of dollars in student debt. The plan would have allowed some borrowers to receive up to $20,000 in debt cancellation, while most others would have been eligible for $10,000 in relief. However, the Supreme Court, dominated by conservatives, struck down the program in 2023, ruling that the president had exceeded his authority due to the significant financial implications of the initiative.

The cost of higher education in the United States remains a substantial burden. College expenses can range from $10,000 to $70,000 annually, often leaving graduates with overwhelming debt as they begin their careers. According to the Pew Research Center, one in four Americans under the age of 40 carried student loan debt in 2023. The median debt amount varied by education level, typically falling between $20,000 and $25,000.

This latest move by Biden underscores his administration’s ongoing efforts to ease the student debt crisis, particularly for those who serve their communities in critical roles.

Math and Computer Science Outshine Engineering Among Indian Students in the US

December 17, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Engineering, once the primary choice for Indian students heading to the United States for higher education, is gradually losing its dominance. According to the latest Open Doors report, an annual survey examining international student exchanges in the US, there has been a noticeable decline in the number of Indian students pursuing engineering programs.

In the 2023-24 academic year, about 24.5 percent of Indian students in the US opted for engineering, a drop from 29.6 percent in 2021-22. In contrast, math and computer science have seen a significant rise in popularity, with 42.9 percent of Indian students enrolling in these fields during the same period.

Rising Popularity of Math and Computer Science

The growing prominence of technology-driven industries has made math and computer science attractive choices for students. Sachin Jain, country manager for Educational Testing Service (ETS) India and South Asia, explained that these fields are closely aligned with emerging areas such as artificial intelligence, data science, and machine learning.

“Even according to the TOEFL insights data, Computing and Information Technology has consistently been a top choice among Indian test-takers in recent years, surpassing conventional engineering preferences,” Jain stated. “This change is primarily driven by factors such as higher employability and flexibility in career options. Computer science and mathematics provide pathways to lucrative careers in high-demand industries such as information technology, software development, and analytics.”

Dr. Sridevi Sarma, vice dean for Graduate Education and Lifelong Learning at Johns Hopkins University, emphasized that engineering is not losing popularity entirely but is undergoing transformation. She said, “Engineering now interacts with and indeed is transforming fields once thought of as not amenable to ‘quantitative’ analysis and description. This includes the interaction with biology, medicine, and healthcare…that are all being transformed by data science, AI, machine learning, and the like.”

Foreign education consultants echo these sentiments, attributing the shift to job market demands in rapidly growing fields like AI, cybersecurity, and data science. Jain noted, “With the rapid growth of AI and related technologies, the computer science market is expanding significantly to include industries wherever technology has been able to make an impact. Moreover, these disciplines open career opportunities in a range of sectors, from finance to healthcare, unlike traditional engineering fields that can often lead to fixed career pathways.”

Interdisciplinary areas combining engineering, mathematics, and computer science are reshaping traditional engineering fields. Sarma explained, “These interdisciplinary areas often fall under mathematics and computer science rather than under traditional engineering disciplines like civil, mechanical, or chemical engineering. Flexibility and applicability in mathematics and computer science offer broad applicability across industries. A strong foundation in these areas allows students to pivot into a wide range of roles, from finance and healthcare to tech and consulting, making them highly attractive.”

Global Interest in Math and Statistics

The appeal of mathematics extends beyond India. Dr. Shantanu Awasthi, assistant professor of data analytics at Missouri Southern State University, pointed out that students from countries like China, Germany, and India are gravitating toward math and statistics. He said, “Not just Indians or Chinese, but even Germans are also taking a keen interest in maths, to be precise statistics, as it plays a vital role in data science, enabling analysts to identify patterns and trends in large and complex data sets. Using statistical methods, data scientists can extract insights and interpret results.”

He further explained, “No matter which branch you take, if you do the right major, you will be able to excel in this field. Now, even in the stock exchange, they use physics equations to solve things.”

In contrast, enrollment figures for other popular courses like social sciences, management, and education have remained relatively stable. For example, 11.5 percent of Indian students in the US pursued management in 2023-24, compared to 11.6 percent in 2022-23 and 13.3 percent in 2021-22.

STEM Fields and Return on Investment

Indian students often prioritize the return on investment (ROI) when choosing their educational paths. According to Sarma, STEM fields, especially computer science, are perceived as gateways to high-paying, high-demand jobs in global tech hubs like Silicon Valley. “Increasingly, modern engineering problems involve computational thinking and data analysis. As a result, students might feel they can achieve their goals more efficiently through computer science or related fields,” she said.

Why Indian Students Prefer the US

The United States remains the top destination for Indian students despite high tuition costs. In 2023-24, approximately 331,602 Indian students were enrolled in US institutions, marking a 23 percent increase from the previous year. Graduate-level enrollments grew by 19 percent, while the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program saw a 41 percent rise.

Jain attributed the US’s continued appeal to its encouragement of Indian students across various disciplines, particularly STEM fields. He highlighted the flexible curriculum, top-ranked universities, and visa policies like the F-1 and OPT, which allow STEM graduates to work in the US for up to three years post-graduation.

“The US has a growing demand for skilled professionals in emerging areas such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics, which continues to draw Indian students and researchers,” Jain added.

Scholarships and financial aid from American universities also make higher education accessible. Additionally, graduate programs in math, computer science, and data science often include funded research assistantships, enabling students to gain practical experience while pursuing their studies.

Raj Echambadi, president of the Illinois Institute of Technology, emphasized the alignment between India’s undergraduate infrastructure and the US education system. He said, “Our undergraduate infrastructure in India is phenomenal and most of these students are in STEM fields, so there is a natural fit… That fit is what is driving a lot of admissions towards Indian students.”

He also pointed to geopolitical factors, saying, “Over the last few years, there has been a very strong relationship between the Indian and the US governments and it has not been the same (with China). That is actually what is accounting for this disparity, if you will.”

Challenges in India and Global Trends

Indian students face intense competition at home, with over a million applicants vying for limited seats in prestigious institutions like IITs through the Joint Entrance Examination (JEE). The low acceptance rates and the availability of education loans make studying abroad an attractive alternative.

Sarma observed a shift in preferences among international students, citing Graduate Record Examination (GRE) data. “Over the past five years (2018–2023), the percentage of Indian students opting for engineering through GRE has consistently hovered around 11–13 percent, reflecting a decline from the more prominent figures seen a decade ago,” she said.

While Indian technical institutions are introducing interdisciplinary courses in AI, electric vehicles, and green technology, traditional branches like mechanical engineering struggle to offer sufficient job opportunities.

Kshitij Pathak, a former MSc Data Science student at the University of Sussex, shared his perspective. “My core branch was Mechanical Engineering during graduation, but there are fewer options in India or even abroad. From ME, you can switch to data science. Maths is the core of data science. If you are a good mathematician, you can easily become a programmer. Looking at the global market, there are more opportunities in maths or CS,” he said.

Math-Driven Careers on the Rise

According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, math-related occupations are projected to grow significantly, with over 30,000 new jobs added annually by the end of the decade. The median annual wage for mathematicians stood at $116,440 in May 2023. This trend explains why traditional engineering fields are becoming less attractive globally, with students favoring math and computer science for their versatility and higher job prospects.

IIT Delhi Tops Indian Universities in Global Sustainability Rankings

December 15, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi has emerged as the top Indian university for sustainability, achieving a significant leap of 255 places to secure the 171st position globally in the 2025 QS Sustainability Rankings, announced on Tuesday. This marks a significant milestone for Indian universities in their pursuit of sustainable practices and global recognition.

A total of 78 Indian universities have found a place in this year’s QS Sustainability Rankings. Among these, nine of the top 10 Indian institutions improved their global rankings compared to the previous year, while 21 institutions made their debut in the rankings.

Notably, IIT Delhi and IIT Kanpur have been recognized among the world’s top 100 universities for their contributions to environmental impact. This distinction highlights their initiatives in addressing environmental challenges through education, research, and practical solutions.

Adding to the accolades, the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) Bengaluru has been ranked among the top 50 institutions globally for its efforts in environmental education. This acknowledgment underscores the institute’s role in shaping future leaders and innovators in sustainability-focused fields.

“Of the 78 Indian universities that feature in the 2025 QS Sustainability rankings, 34 have improved on last year’s placing, and eight have maintained their positions,” stated Ben Sowter, Vice President of London-based QS.

Sowter emphasized the broader implications of these rankings, noting, “This is an excellent achievement for the Indian higher education ecosystem and shows that Indian universities are forging ahead with their sustainability initiatives.”

Despite the achievements, Sowter highlighted areas where Indian universities could enhance their global impact. “Within the Social Impact category, Indian universities can look to improve their indicator scores in the Health and Wellbeing, Impact of Education, and Equality lenses, where no institutions from the country feature in the top 350. However, universities from India scored better in the Knowledge Exchange and Employability and Outcomes lenses,” he added.

The 2025 QS Sustainability Rankings have expanded significantly, featuring over 1,740 universities from 107 countries and territories. This represents a notable increase from the previous edition, which included 1,397 institutions across 95 locations.

Globally, the University of Toronto has claimed the top spot in this year’s rankings, followed by ETH Zurich in second place. Lund University in Sweden and the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) share the third position.

Indian universities’ growing prominence in these rankings reflects their dedication to sustainability, research excellence, and global collaboration. With continued efforts, they aim to address critical challenges in areas such as climate change, environmental conservation, and social equity, further enhancing their global standing.

Massachusetts to Open New Pathway for Internationally-Trained Doctors to Practice

December 13, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation, Health 0

Physicians trained outside the United States will soon have a new opportunity to practice medicine in Massachusetts, thanks to a program designed to grant medical licenses under specific conditions. State officials are introducing this initiative to address critical shortages in medical care, particularly in primary care. The move is seen as a step toward bridging the gap between healthcare demand and available physicians.

The program allows internationally-trained doctors to practice without undergoing a traditional residency or training program. Instead, these physicians would work under a limited or restricted license, supervised within community health centers or hospitals. They would also receive mentorship for a minimum of three years. This arrangement specifically targets areas where access to primary care doctors is scarce and patients face long wait times for appointments.

According to the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition, there are potentially hundreds of physicians living in the state with international medical training who could provide care for tens of thousands of patients.

“It’s a win, win,” said Saira Asjad, a former primary care doctor in Pakistan now residing in Massachusetts. “This will bridge that gap between the health care need and the physicians who are not able to practice.”

State Senator Jason Lewis, a Democrat from Middlesex and an advocate for integrating internationally-trained doctors into the Massachusetts healthcare workforce, expressed optimism about the program’s potential. “There’s a lot of evidence that these physicians who speak other languages, who understand other cultures, provide excellent care to populations that share the same background and culture,” Lewis said.

The program was incorporated into an economic development bill signed into law by Governor Maura Healey in late November. The Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine will oversee the creation of operating rules for the initiative, which is expected to take about a year before the first applicants begin their work.

Michael Curry, president of the Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, envisions this program serving as a model for other healthcare professions, such as nursing. He anticipates significant interest from medical professionals worldwide. “We’ll be a place that people come from all over the country and even all over the globe to come here to practice,” Curry said.

Massachusetts joins a small group of states exploring ways to leverage the expertise of internationally-trained doctors to improve access to primary care. However, efforts in other states have faced challenges. For instance, Tennessee regulators hesitated to approve similar applications due to difficulties in verifying applicants’ credentials.

To address these concerns, Massachusetts plans to implement regulations requiring internationally-trained physicians to pass exams and obtain the same credentials required of U.S.-trained doctors.

This program represents a significant step in tackling the growing healthcare needs of underserved populations while providing a pathway for skilled international professionals to contribute meaningfully to the state’s healthcare system.

India’s Graduates Poised to Become a Global Workforce by 2025

December 12, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

By 2025, approximately 55 percent of Indian graduates are projected to be globally employable, up from 51.2 percent in 2024, underscoring India’s growing contribution to the international workforce. This significant trend was highlighted in the recently released India Skills Report 2025, which reflects the country’s increasing role in addressing global demand for skilled professionals.

The report, prepared by the Confederation of Indian Industry in partnership with Wheebox and the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), provides a detailed analysis of employability among Indian graduates. Management graduates top the employability charts, with 78 percent deemed globally employable. Engineering graduates follow at 71.5 percent, closely trailed by MCA (Master of Computer Applications) graduates at 71 percent, and science graduates at 58 percent.

Highlighting geographic trends, the report identifies Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Delhi as key hubs for employable talent. Within these states, cities like Pune, Bengaluru, and Mumbai are recognized as leaders in nurturing a skilled workforce capable of meeting both domestic and international demands.

Gender-based analysis reveals notable differences in employability trends. For men, the employability rate is expected to rise from 51.8 percent in 2024 to 53.5 percent in 2025. In contrast, women are projected to experience a decline in employability, with rates dropping from 50.9 percent to 47.5 percent over the same period.

The findings are based on data from the Wheebox Global Employability Test, which evaluated the skills of 650,000 candidates. This comprehensive assessment highlights the aspirations of Indian students, with 93 percent expressing a strong interest in pursuing internships as part of their career preparation.

Nirmal Singh, the chief convenor of the India Skills Report, emphasized the importance of enhancing skill training programs to bolster international mobility. “The decade ahead should focus on quality skill training to enable better international mobility, particularly through long-term, certified skill programs with embedded language training,” Singh stated.

Complementing this analysis, another report titled Decoding Jobs – 2025, also released by CII, sheds light on hiring trends and intentions for the financial year 2026. According to this report, the hiring intent among firms stands at 9.8 percent, with certain sectors demonstrating higher recruitment ambitions. Global capability centers, heavy engineering firms, and banking and financial industries exhibit the highest hiring intent at 12 percent, followed by core industries at 11.5 percent and the FMCG sector at 10 percent.

These reports collectively paint an optimistic picture of India’s ability to meet global workforce demands while addressing skill development gaps and gender disparities.

Decline in F-1 Visas for Indian Students in the US Signals Shifting Trends

December 10, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

India is experiencing a substantial decline in the number of F-1 student visas issued to its students by the United States, as per an analysis of US State Department data cited in a news report. This marks the first significant drop since the post-pandemic recovery in international students attending American universities.

From January to September this year, 64,008 F-1 visas were granted to Indian students, representing a 38% decrease from the same period in 2023 when 1,03,495 visas were issued, according to Indianexpress.com. The analysis, based on monthly non-immigrant visa reports available on the Bureau of Consular Affairs’ website, reveals a clear downward trend after a peak in student migration to the US for higher education.

In 2021, the same nine-month period saw 65,235 F-1 visas issued to Indian students. This figure rose to 93,181 in 2022 but has plummeted sharply in 2024. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the number dropped dramatically, with only 6,646 visas issued in 2020. Following the pandemic, as universities reopened, there was a significant recovery in international student mobility. However, the recent decline may indicate changing dynamics in the US-India student migration corridor.

Several factors may contribute to this sharp decline. The report highlights changing US immigration policies, increasing costs associated with studying abroad, geopolitical tensions, and greater access to quality higher education opportunities within India as possible reasons.

Chinese students have also experienced a decline in F-1 visas, though the drop has been less severe. The analysis shows that from January to September this year, 73,781 visas were issued to Chinese students, marking an 8% decrease from the 80,603 visas granted during the same period in 2023. Despite the decline, the figure remains higher than the 52,034 visas issued in 2022, suggesting a relatively steady trend for Chinese students.

Key Features of the US F-1 Visa

The F-1 visa is a non-immigrant visa specifically designed for international students who wish to pursue full-time studies at accredited institutions in the United States. Below are some essential aspects of the F-1 visa:

Purpose:

The F-1 visa is intended for students enrolled in academic programs at institutions such as universities, colleges, high schools, conservatories, or vocational schools.

Requirements:

To qualify for an F-1 visa, applicants must:

Gain admission to a US school approved by the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS).
Provide evidence of sufficient financial resources to cover tuition, living expenses, and other costs during their study period.
Demonstrate intent to return to their home country upon completing their studies.

Duration:

The F-1 visa is valid for the duration of the academic program, with an additional 60-day grace period after graduation or program completion to allow students to prepare for departure. The total duration depends on the program’s length, such as four years for a bachelor’s degree.

Work Eligibility:

While primarily focused on academics, F-1 visa holders have limited work opportunities under specific conditions:

On-campus employment during the academic term or breaks.
Curricular Practical Training (CPT), which involves work directly related to the student’s field of study.
Optional Practical Training (OPT), which allows students to work for up to 12 months after completing their studies to gain practical experience in their area of expertise.

The ongoing decline in F-1 visas issued to Indian students underscores potential shifts in global student mobility trends and may prompt further analysis of the factors influencing these changes. While Chinese students also face a decline, their numbers appear more stable, highlighting differing patterns in international student migration.

Trump’s Green Card Proposal Sparks Hope, Skepticism, and Criticism

December 7, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation, Immigration 0

Five months ago, Donald Trump made a surprising pledge during his campaign, a stark contrast to his previous hardline stance on immigration. Speaking to a group of tech investors on The All-In Podcast, Trump proposed that foreign students graduating from U.S. colleges should receive green cards as part of their diplomas. “What I want to do, and what I will do, is — you graduate from a college, I think you should get automatically, as part of your diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country,” he said.

If this policy is implemented and approved by Congress, it could create a pathway for millions of international students to become permanent residents. However, these are significant “ifs,” as Trump has not revisited the idea publicly, leaving questions about the specifics and feasibility of such a policy.

A Broader Proposal, Then a Narrower Vision

The U.S. hosted over 1.1 million international students in the 2023-24 academic year, a record high, according to recent data. These students generally hold nonimmigrant visas, which allow them to study but not remain permanently. Trump’s podcast comments marked a sharp departure from his administration’s previous policies that reduced legal immigration and aligned with anti-immigrant rhetoric.

The idea emerged during a conversation with venture capitalist Jason Calacanis, who asked Trump to enhance the U.S.’s ability to attract global talent. Trump expanded on the concept, suggesting that all college graduates, including those from junior colleges and doctoral programs, should be eligible for green cards. Shortly after the podcast, Trump’s campaign spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt clarified that this policy would involve strict vetting to exclude “communists, radical Islamists, Hamas supporters, America haters, and public charges.” She added, “He believes, only after such vetting has taken place, we ought to keep the most skilled graduates who can make significant contributions to America.”

International Students’ Mixed Reactions

For many international students, such a policy could be life-changing. Metolo Foyet, a Ph.D. student from Cameroon at the University of Florida, emphasized the stress of navigating current immigration processes. “Having it would erase that pressure. And we can 100% focus on what we need to do and give back to this country who has given so much to us,” she said.

However, skepticism abounds. Egyptian student Dany Rashwan, studying computer engineering at the University of Florida, initially felt optimistic but quickly recalled how unpredictable policies during the pandemic affected foreign students. “Graduating this semester, it was really difficult to find a job,” Rashwan noted. Out of 200 companies at a career fair, only three offered sponsorship for international students. Similarly, Haomin Huang, a forestry master’s student at the University of Georgia, expressed frustration with the current visa lottery system, which he described as luck-based. He noted that many graduates leave the U.S. for countries with more straightforward immigration pathways. “Because of the immigration policy, they chose to leave,” Huang said.

Universities See Potential for Collaboration

University leaders view Trump’s proposal as an opportunity to address longstanding challenges. Raj Echambadi, president of the Illinois Institute of Technology and co-chair of the Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, recounted his own struggles as an international student. “From an institutional point of view, I would hope that this green card promise comes through,” he said. Echambadi suggested starting with a narrower pilot program for disciplines critical to national security and economic development, which could still have a substantial impact.

Sarah Spreitzer, vice president of government relations for the American Council on Education, noted that the proposal echoed efforts during Trump’s first term to attract high-skilled immigrants. While those initiatives did not materialize into legislation, Spreitzer found the renewed focus encouraging. “I think it’s an area that we can collaborate with the administration on,” she said.

Criticism from All Sides

Trump’s idea faced immediate backlash from critics, including those who typically support his immigration policies. Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies argued it could lead to exploitation and harm American workers. “It would turn every university (and community college!) into a citizenship-selling machine,” he wrote in National Review.

Institute of International Education CEO Allan Goodman also raised concerns, suggesting the policy could exacerbate brain drain in students’ home countries. “The dream that encourages them to study abroad is to improve their countries…automatically issuing very tempting green cards…could upset this dynamic,” Goodman argued in Times Higher Education.

Challenges in Congress and Alternative Approaches

Even if Trump champions this initiative, he would require Congressional support to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act. Krikorian predicted significant resistance. “There will be enormous pushback within Congress, even among his own supporters,” he said. Instead, he proposed reallocating visas from family-based categories to skilled workers or eliminating the diversity visa lottery.

Despite the hurdles, some remain cautiously optimistic. Huang speculated that Trump’s alliance with Elon Musk, an advocate for increased legal immigration, could influence reform. “He might be the one who pushes this,” Huang said.

For now, international students like Foyet remain watchful. “We know that this is politics…It’s one thing to say it, but another thing when you’re in power. Is it going to be a reality?” she said. The future of Trump’s proposal, like the lives of many international students, hangs in the balance.

University of Michigan Renews Partnership with Madras Christian College, Launches New Global Program

December 6, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The University of Michigan (U-M) School of Social Work has reinforced its collaboration with India’s Madras Christian College (MCC), extending their partnership for a second renewal since its initiation in 2016. This initiative highlights U-M’s dedication to fostering global academic relationships, with 16 active partnerships across Indian institutions in fields such as engineering, medicine, business, and social work.

“We have been partnering with Madras Christian College since 2016,” noted Dr. Katie Lopez, director of the office of global activities at the U-M School of Social Work. “We have found it so valuable that we’ve renewed the five-year partnership program twice. We offer an exchange of faculty and students, research collaborations, and a global course introducing key social work issues in India.”

This year marked a significant milestone for the partnership with the introduction of the Global Course Extension (GCE), a faculty-led international initiative held in Chennai. Eleven Master of Social Work (MSW) students from U-M participated in the program, which explored the “Grand Challenges for Social Work.” Key issues addressed included combating racism and caste discrimination, reducing health disparities, responding to environmental challenges, and addressing violence against women by fostering healthier relationships.

Dr. B. Prince Solomon Devadass, associate professor and fieldwork coordinator at MCC, emphasized the mutual benefits of the collaboration. “Both schools are passionate about a shared value system, professionalism, and global engagement. That is our connection and why the partnership is so successful,” he explained.

The GCE program was spearheaded by Dr. Ashley Cureton (Bhavalkar) and blended academic coursework with immersive fieldwork. Participants began their journey with a one-credit preparatory course in Ann Arbor, where they gained foundational knowledge before traveling to Chennai for a two-credit experiential learning segment. Once in Chennai, the program offered a holistic experience, including Tamil language classes, lectures from local experts, and visits to field sites.

One of the notable sites was a home for mentally disabled women, where students learned about the challenges and care provided to this vulnerable group. Another impactful visit was to the Irula Tribal Women’s Welfare Society, which works to empower marginalized tribal communities in the region.

Kelz Cousins, an MSW student who took part in the program, reflected on the immersive and transformative experience. “Our days were long and extremely impactful. In the mornings, we learned Tamil and heard lectures from amazing local experts. In the afternoons, we visited communities and organizations doing incredible work. The Irula communities, in particular, stood out as some of the greenest, most sustainable places I’ve ever seen,” Cousins shared.

For many participants, the program provided not only professional growth but also a deep personal connection to the field of social work. “This course deepened my connection to the field of mental health,” said Shreeja Vachhani, a U-M MSW student originally from India. “It’s a one-of-a-kind experience that allows students to explore a different culture while gaining meaningful professional insights.”

The program concluded with a farewell dinner, offering students and faculty a chance to reflect on their experiences and celebrate the knowledge they gained. This moment of closure was an emotional highlight for many, underlining the program’s lasting impact on both academic and personal levels.

Through this renewed partnership, U-M and MCC have demonstrated the power of cross-cultural academic collaboration. By addressing critical social issues and providing hands-on learning opportunities, the initiative is preparing the next generation of social work professionals to tackle global challenges with empathy and expertise.

India to Provide Free Access to Academic Journals Through One Nation-One Subscription Plan

December 5, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

India, the world’s third-largest producer of research papers, is poised to transform access to academic resources with its upcoming One Nation-One Subscription (ONOS) initiative. Starting in January 2025, this groundbreaking plan will grant free access to nearly 13,000 journals from leading publishers like Elsevier, Springer Nature, and Wiley to 18 million students, researchers, and faculty members across the country. This ambitious project has drawn praise from international observers who view it as a significant step toward reshaping India’s research ecosystem.

What Is the One Nation-One Subscription Plan?

Announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s cabinet on November 25, the ONOS plan involves a $715 million investment over three years and covers subscriptions from 30 major publishers. This makes it the largest initiative of its kind globally. After two years of extensive negotiations, the plan is set to consolidate access to research papers through a single online portal, streamlining costs and expanding availability. According to a study conducted by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Mumbai, this initiative could cut research-related expenses by 18%, offering substantial benefits to millions of knowledge seekers in the country.

Foreign Reactions to ONOS

The ONOS initiative has received widespread praise from international audiences. A Reddit user from the United States remarked, “Easy access to knowledge is hugely beneficial, and I hope the US can compete with it in the long term.” Another commenter highlighted the broader implications, saying, “India is doing things right here.”

Zaitoon, a medical student in the U.S., shared her personal struggles, writing, “Wow. I used to cry about this all the time during med school. Not having access to journals is a huge barrier to (open) science and research. Big equalizer moves from the Indian government.”

On social media platform X, one user expressed admiration for Prime Minister Modi and his administration, stating, “I greatly admire Modi and his cabinet. It’s sad that many people fail to see the incredible work he and his administration have done for the country. They are a prime example of how a nation and its leaders should operate to manage 1.5 billion people while addressing the corruption and mess created by previous governments. Modi is truly an exceptional leader.”

Another commenter predicted significant benefits for India’s research capabilities, saying, “This will take Indian research and scientific advancement to another level. I hope other developing countries can think long-term and lay such strong foundations for sustained development.”

Reflecting on broader implications for global access, one user noted, “The US hasn’t but should. A small step towards equal collections across all institutions. Anything published in the US should automatically have a site license for the US government. (Another proposal that needs traction in Congress).”

Why Is India Investing So Much in Journal Subscriptions?

The ONOS plan represents a landmark effort by India’s Union Cabinet to democratize access to academic research. By making critical resources available to students and institutions irrespective of their financial capabilities, the initiative seeks to bridge gaps in the availability of academic literature.

However, the significant investment in traditional journal subscriptions has sparked debate, particularly as the global research landscape increasingly embraces Open Access (OA) publishing. OA allows free access to research articles without requiring authors to pay fees and has rapidly gained momentum, with half of all new research articles being published under this model.

Critics argue that India’s reliance on traditional subscription models may be a short-term solution. Sridhar Gutam, a prominent advocate for Open Access, told Science.Org that India should prioritize OA initiatives over subscription-based approaches. Similarly, Muthu Madhan, a director at O.P. Jindal Global University, suggested that the funds allocated for ONOS could have been better spent on improving research stipends and enhancing laboratory infrastructure.

Balancing Access and Infrastructure

While critics question the emphasis on journal subscriptions, other experts emphasize the importance of a balanced approach that includes reliable access to resources and robust research infrastructure. Professor Manoj Kumar Tiwari highlighted the critical role of data, equipment, consumables, and support services in fostering academic growth.

Tiwari views the ONOS plan as part of a broader strategy to improve the country’s research environment, explaining, “This scheme will provide access to journals while also improving research infrastructure, creating a more efficient and accessible environment for academic growth and innovation.”

India’s ONOS initiative reflects a bold move to strengthen its academic and research capabilities. While the plan has sparked debates on priorities and long-term strategies, its potential to democratize knowledge access and boost scientific innovation has been widely acknowledged, both domestically and internationally.

Canada Faces Immigration Challenges as Temporary Permits Near Expiry

December 3, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

By the end of 2025, nearly five million temporary permits in Canada are set to expire, a development that has prompted immigration officials to anticipate that the majority of permit holders will leave voluntarily. Immigration Minister Marc Miller addressed the issue during a Commons immigration committee meeting earlier this week, emphasizing the systems in place to monitor compliance.

Of the expiring permits, approximately 766,000 belong to international students, a demographic grappling with increasing difficulties due to recent immigration policy changes. Conservative MP Tom Kmiec raised concerns about how the government plans to manage such a substantial number of expiring visas. Responding to these concerns, Miller assured the committee that mechanisms, including the Canada Border Services Agency, are equipped to identify and handle violations effectively.

Miller also noted that not all temporary residents would need to leave Canada. He explained, “Some will receive renewals or postgraduate work permits.” These work permits, typically valid for nine months to three years, are designed to help international students gain the work experience necessary for their permanent residency applications.

The evolving immigration policies have sparked visible discontent, particularly among students from Punjab. Since August, many have been protesting by camping in tents in Brampton, expressing frustration over the unexpected policy shifts. Several protesters claim they arrived in Canada under the assumption that they would eventually be allowed to stay permanently.

According to data from the immigration department, Canada hosted over one million international students as of May 2023. By the end of that year, 396,235 of these students held Post-Graduation Work Permits (PGWPs), a figure nearly three times higher than in 2018. However, the rising number of PGWPs set to expire within the next year, coupled with tighter immigration rules, has intensified the competition for permanent residency among international students.

Canada’s decision to curtail the number of international student permits has added to the challenges. In 2024, the issuance of these permits was reduced by 35%, with an additional 10% cut planned for 2025. The government has cited pressures on the housing market as a primary factor behind these reductions.

The immigration challenges are further complicated by the growing number of students filing for asylum, a trend that Immigration Minister Miller flagged as concerning. Last month, he indicated that the government aims to expedite the processing of asylum claims to identify and eliminate fraudulent applications more swiftly.

The shifting landscape of immigration policies has not only affected temporary residents but has also ignited a broader political debate. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has openly criticized Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s approach, arguing that the government’s policies have sown uncertainty among temporary residents while failing to tackle critical issues like housing shortages effectively. Poilievre highlighted government data showing that nearly five million temporary residents are expected to leave Canada by the end of 2025.

As Canada navigates these complexities, the interplay between immigration policies, housing market dynamics, and political discourse continues to shape the experiences of temporary residents and the broader national landscape.

Cornell Honors Ratan Tata with Distinguished Alumni Award

November 30, 2024December 3, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The College of Architecture, Art, and Planning (AAP) at Cornell University has introduced the Ratan N. Tata Distinguished Alumni Award to celebrate the extensive philanthropic efforts and global influence of Ratan Tata ’59, B.Arch. ’62, a renowned business leader, Cornell trustee, and former AAP Advisory Council member. Tata, who served as chairman emeritus of Tata Sons and chairman of the Tata Trusts, passed away on October 9.

“Ratan Tata’s impact on Cornell was transformative,” remarked Interim President Michael I. Kotlikoff. “His generous contributions reflected Cornell’s core values and priorities, and his support of the university’s mission helped it evolve and advance over decades.”

Tata’s career was characterized by his dedication to improving lives in his home country, India, and across the globe. Earlier this year, when the award was being planned, he expressed his gratitude for his time at Cornell. “My years at Cornell in the College of Architecture, Art and Planning hold a special place in my heart – and the education I received has shaped my life and perspective in meaningful ways,” Tata said. “It is incredibly gratifying to know that this award will serve to recognize others who use their Cornell education to build and create good in the world.”

The inaugural award will be posthumously conferred on Tata, after which it will be awarded annually or biennially to AAP alumni who demonstrate a commitment to creating meaningful societal change through their vision and efforts.

“Ratan possessed a profound concern and care for humanity,” said J. Meejin Yoon, Gale and Ira Drukier Dean of AAP. “His personal dedication to improving lives through philanthropy in support of initiatives spanning education, research, health, and the built environment is deeply inspiring. While his Cornell education was rooted in architecture, his life’s work has been expansive in scope and distinctly shaped by his inherent sense of responsibility and optimism. With the establishment of this award, we celebrate his legacy and the work of others who share a similar commitment to making positive change in the world.”

Tata’s journey at Cornell began in 1955 when he enrolled in the College of Engineering before transferring to AAP. After earning his degree, he briefly worked as an architect in Los Angeles before returning to Mumbai to join his family’s business, Tata Sons. As part of the Tata Group—a conglomerate spanning sectors such as manufacturing, mobility, financial services, and hospitality—he gradually climbed the ranks, becoming chairman in 1991. Under his leadership, the company expanded significantly, reaching $100 billion in revenue by the time he stepped down in 2012. Tata credited his Cornell education in architecture and design for honing his problem-solving abilities and fostering his capacity for creative solutions.

After retiring, Tata took on the role of chairman of the Tata Trusts, which hold a 66% stake in Tata companies and are India’s largest private-sector philanthropic organization. Through these trusts, he spearheaded initiatives aimed at enhancing nutrition, education, water and sanitation, digital transformation, social justice, and inclusion in India.

“Ratan Tata’s visionary leadership and unwavering commitment to social responsibility have left an indelible mark on India and beyond,” noted N. Chandrasekaran, chairman of Tata Sons. “He had a deep love for Cornell University, which played an important role in his uniquely remarkable journey. He found it very gratifying to know that this award in his name will help to celebrate and inspire innovation, excellence, and a strong commitment to social good.”

Throughout his life, Tata maintained a close relationship with Cornell. He served on the university’s Board of Trustees from 2006 to 2022 and joined the AAP Advisory Council in 2014. In 2008, the Tata Trusts established the Tata Scholarship for Students from India and the Tata-Cornell Institute for Agriculture and Nutrition, which focuses on collaborative research to combat rural poverty and malnutrition in India. Additionally, in 2017, Tata Consultancy Services, a major entity within the Tata Group, invested $50 million in Cornell Tech for its initial construction phase on Roosevelt Island, resulting in the naming of the Tata Innovation Center.

Beyond his contributions to Cornell, Tata served as a trustee and jury member for prestigious organizations such as the Pritzker Architecture Prize, Alcoa, Mondelez International, the East-West Center, and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. His extensive list of accolades includes the Padma Bhushan and Padma Vibhushan—two of India’s highest civilian honors—and the Carnegie Medal of Philanthropy.

An inaugural ceremony for the Ratan N. Tata Distinguished Alumni Award will be organized by AAP to honor Tata’s legacy, highlighting his humanitarian contributions and transformative impact on Cornell and the world.

Indian-American Entrepreneur Jay Chaudhry Pledges $4 Million to Support First-Generation Students at the University of Cincinnati

November 30, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Indian-American entrepreneur and CEO of the cloud security firm Zscaler, Jay Chaudhry, along with his wife, Jyothi Chaudhry, has pledged $4 million to the University of Cincinnati. This significant contribution aims to support first-generation college students through scholarships and other financial assistance.

The couple’s donation will establish the Chaudhry Family Scholarship Fund, which will benefit students in the Gen-1 1MPACT House, a unique living-learning community for first-generation, Pell-eligible students. The University of Cincinnati stated that the fund would provide scholarships to approximately 150 students starting in fall 2025. These scholarships are designed to bridge financial gaps after federal grants and other awards are applied.

University of Cincinnati President Neville G. Pinto expressed profound gratitude for the Chaudhrys’ contribution. He described the pledge as a transformative act for students, their families, and the broader community. “I’m truly grateful that Jay and Jyoti are dedicated partners in our ongoing commitment to first-generation students,” Pinto remarked.

Jay and Jyothi Chaudhry, both alumni of the University of Cincinnati, attributed much of their success to the education they received at the institution. Reflecting on their journey, the couple stated, “We are very grateful for the excellent education we got at UC which played a significant role in our success. In fact, both of us got tuition scholarships for our graduate studies without which we couldn’t afford to get our masters’ degrees.”

Jay Chaudhry earned two master’s degrees in science from the University of Cincinnati’s College of Engineering and Applied Science, specializing in electrical and computer engineering in 1982 and industrial engineering and management in 1983. He later completed an MBA at the university in 1986. Jyothi followed suit, earning her MBA in 1987.

“This scholarship fund is a gesture of our gratitude and appreciation to our alma mater that will help many needy students to complete their college education and change their and their families’ lives,” the couple added.

The Gen-1 Program, the focus of the Chaudhry Family Scholarship Fund, was launched in 2008 as the first residential initiative in the United States dedicated to first-generation college students. It offers comprehensive academic, personal, and social support to participants, fostering a supportive environment for academic success.

Suzette Combs, director of the Gen-1 Program, highlighted the significant impact of the Chaudhrys’ gift. She noted that the donation sends a powerful message of encouragement to students. “This gift lets them know that there are people out there who believe in them and think they belong here,” Combs said. “There’s very little that can take the place of that and it is empowering for our students.”

The Gen-1 Program has achieved remarkable results, boasting a first-to-second-year retention rate of 98 percent. This figure far exceeds the national average retention rate of 68 percent for first-generation college students.

With the establishment of the Chaudhry Family Scholarship Fund, the Chaudhrys aim to extend the opportunities they once received to the next generation. Their contribution ensures that students with financial constraints can access higher education and potentially transform their lives and the lives of their families.

U.S. Universities Advise International Students to Return Before Trump’s Inauguration Amid Immigration Uncertainty

November 30, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to take office, concerns are rising among U.S. universities about potential disruptions to international students’ travel and visa statuses. Anticipating significant changes to American immigration policies under the incoming administration, several universities are urging their international students and staff to return to campus before Trump’s inauguration on January 20. These institutions worry that the new president’s hardline stance on immigration, including large-scale deportations and restrictive measures, could lead to complications similar to those faced during his first term.

Prominent universities such as the University of Massachusetts, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and Wesleyan University have issued travel advisories. These advisories strongly recommend that international students return to the U.S. before the inauguration to avoid potential visa issues or travel disruptions. Notably, Trump’s first term saw a series of controversial immigration policies, including a 2017 executive order that banned nationals from several predominantly Muslim countries, as well as from North Korea and Venezuela. The lingering impact of such measures continues to influence university planning and the decision-making of international students.

“A lot of students have concerns about their visas and whether they’ll be allowed to continue their education,” said Chloe East, a professor at the University of Colorado Denver, in an interview with the BBC. This sentiment reflects widespread anxiety among international students who fear that changes to immigration policies could prevent them from returning to or remaining in the U.S. to pursue their academic careers.

To help alleviate some of these concerns, Yale University has taken proactive steps by hosting webinars through its Office of International Students and Scholars. These webinars aim to provide students with updated information and guidance on the potential shifts in immigration policies under the Trump administration, helping them navigate the uncertainty of the coming months.

The uncertainty surrounding immigration policies is particularly affecting undocumented students in the U.S. According to the Higher Ed Immigration Portal, more than 400,000 undocumented students are currently enrolled in U.S. higher education, many of whom are unsure of their future in the country. The Trump administration’s previous attempts to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which provides protections for migrants brought to the U.S. as children, have left many international students feeling vulnerable. Although former Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official Tom Homan has emphasized that violent criminals and national security threats will be prioritized for deportation, many international students remain fearful that other groups, including those on student visas, may face heightened scrutiny under the new administration.

Aoi Maeda, a Japanese student at Earlham College in Indiana, expressed her concern about the future of international students under Trump’s immigration policies. “I feel like us international students with a visa might get affected, and it’ll become easier to deport us,” Maeda shared. She explained that the uncertainty surrounding her visa status is making it more difficult to focus on her academic progress and future career goals.

International students from China are particularly apprehensive about the potential for stricter immigration policies targeting Chinese nationals. Rising tensions between the U.S. and China have only intensified these concerns, as many Chinese students fear that the political climate will lead to increased scrutiny and more stringent visa regulations.

Amid these challenges, university officials and faculty members are striving to provide as much support as possible to international students. University leaders have emphasized the importance of reassuring students during a time of political uncertainty. “Students are incredibly overwhelmed and stressed out right now as a result of the uncertainty around immigration,” noted Professor East. The heightened anxiety is exacerbated by the unpredictability of Trump’s immigration policies and the possible impact they will have on students’ ability to study and remain in the U.S.

The education community has also underscored the broader implications of the Trump administration’s immigration policies on academic diversity and international collaboration. Many universities are emphasizing the importance of maintaining a welcoming environment for students from around the world, recognizing that international students contribute significantly to the cultural and intellectual richness of U.S. campuses. As part of these efforts, universities are urging international students to be proactive about their visa status and take steps to minimize potential disruptions.

By advising students to return to the U.S. before Trump’s inauguration, universities hope to help mitigate some of the possible challenges caused by the anticipated changes in immigration policy. Although the future remains uncertain, universities are committed to supporting their international communities and ensuring that students can continue their academic journeys without fear of deportation or visa-related complications.

The uncertainty surrounding U.S. immigration policies under President-elect Trump has led several universities to take precautionary measures to protect their international students. The advisory to return to campus before January 20 is a reflection of the anxiety and fear that many international students are facing regarding their visas and their ability to continue their studies. With immigration policies remaining in flux, universities are stepping up to offer guidance and reassurance to their international communities, emphasizing the importance of maintaining academic diversity and global collaboration.

As Trump prepares to assume office, the future of U.S. immigration policies remains a key point of concern for international students, staff, and academic communities across the country.

AIIMS, IIT Delhi, and UCL Forge Partnership to Transform Global Healthcare

November 25, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

A groundbreaking partnership has been established between the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in New Delhi, the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, and University College London (UCL). The alliance, revealed on November 22, 2024, seeks to revolutionize healthcare innovation and tackle critical health challenges on a global scale.

This collaboration merges the strengths of these renowned institutions in medical science, engineering, and global policy to develop transformative solutions in healthcare technology. The initiative is poised to make strides in crucial areas such as diagnostics, imaging, artificial intelligence (AI), medical devices, and digital health, with a particular focus on creating cost-effective innovations to enhance patient care worldwide.

Professor Alok Thakar, who heads the Centre for Medical Innovation and Entrepreneurship at AIIMS, expressed enthusiasm about the initiative, emphasizing its transformative potential. “This partnership combines expertise in medical science, engineering, and global policy to foster MedTech innovation. Together, we aim to set new standards in healthcare and improve patient outcomes,” he stated.

Echoing this sentiment, Professor Rangan Banerjee, Director of IIT Delhi, highlighted the importance of affordability in healthcare innovation. He remarked, “By integrating science, engineering, and medicine, we can create impactful, cost-effective solutions to improve lives.”

Key Features of the Collaboration

The partnership includes several pivotal elements aimed at fostering cross-disciplinary innovation and addressing pressing healthcare issues:

Joint research programs focused on global health challenges.

Exchange programs for students and staff to encourage collaborative learning and knowledge sharing.

Collaborative degree programs designed to train the next generation of healthcare innovators.

Regular workshops, conferences, and publications to share insights and findings with a broader audience.

Dr. Michael Spence, President and Provost of UCL, emphasized the value of global cooperation in addressing complex health issues. He stated, “Bringing together diverse disciplines through global partnerships can address some of the world’s most pressing health challenges.”

Memorandum of Understanding and Key Visits

The formal agreement for this partnership was marked by the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). As part of the event, the delegation visited mPRAGATI, IIT Delhi’s premier medical technology development center.

Reflecting on the collaboration, Professor Naresh Bhatnagar, Dean of Research and Development at IIT Delhi, underscored the interconnectedness of modern medicine and technology. “Modern medical science is deeply intertwined with technology. This collaboration will create solutions that benefit people not just in India and the UK but globally,” he remarked.

A Vision for Global Impact

The unified expertise of AIIMS, IIT Delhi, and UCL in medicine, engineering, and policy-making is expected to drive groundbreaking advancements in healthcare. The partnership represents a bold step toward creating innovative and accessible medical technologies that have the potential to reshape the global healthcare landscape.

By harnessing their collective strengths, these institutions aim to address some of the most urgent healthcare challenges, set new benchmarks in medical innovation, and improve outcomes for patients worldwide.

Canada Raises Off-Campus Work Limit for International Students to 24 Hours per Week

November 23, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Canada has announced an increase in the weekly off-campus work limit for international students, raising the cap from 20 to 24 hours starting November 8, 2024. This adjustment is set to benefit students already residing in Canada by allowing them to work more hours while maintaining their studies.

Marc Miller, Minister of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship, elaborated on the change, stating, “The new cap strikes a balance between allowing students to gain work experience and ensuring they can concentrate on their studies.”

Eligibility for Off-Campus Work

Not all international students are eligible to work off-campus. To qualify without the need for a separate work permit, students must fulfill specific conditions:

Full-time enrollment at a Designated Learning Institution (DLI): This includes participation in post-secondary academic, vocational, or professional programs.

Study program requirements: Students must be enrolled in programs that lead to a degree, diploma, or certificate lasting at least six months. In Quebec, this includes vocational training at the secondary level.

Valid study permit: A study permit must explicitly allow off-campus work.

Social Insurance Number (SIN): Students are required to obtain a SIN before beginning employment.

Students who do not meet these criteria are prohibited from working off-campus.

Understanding Full-Time Work Hours

Canada’s immigration website explains that while there is no fixed weekly hour limit defining “full-time” work, students are allowed to work up to 24 hours per week during academic sessions without scheduled breaks. Exceeding this limit constitutes a violation of their study permit’s terms, potentially jeopardizing their ability to obtain future study or work permits.

Who Cannot Work Off-Campus?

Certain categories of students are ineligible for off-campus work unless they acquire a separate work permit:

Students whose study permits explicitly state they are not allowed to work off-campus.

Students enrolled in English or French as a second language (ESL/FSL) programs.

Those pursuing only general interest courses.

Individuals taking preparatory courses required for admission to a full-time program.

Students who no longer meet eligibility requirements due to changes in their study circumstances.

If a student’s program changes, they may apply to amend the conditions of their study permit, provided their new program allows off-campus work.

Post-Pandemic Adjustments

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, international students were permitted to work up to 20 hours per week during academic sessions. A temporary policy during the pandemic allowed them to exceed this limit, but that provision ended on April 30, 2024.

Canada’s Recent Immigration Policy Changes

The updated work cap is one of several changes introduced in Canada’s immigration landscape. Adjustments to the Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP) Program and the discontinuation of the Student Direct Stream (SDS) scheme reflect the country’s efforts to regulate its growing foreign student population while aligning immigration policies with labor market demands.

Financial Pressures Amid Inflation

In addition to navigating changes in work hours, international students, particularly those from India, face challenges stemming from rising inflation. As of October 2024, Canada’s inflation rate was reported at 2%, a significant decline from the peak of 8.1% in June 2022. Despite the overall decrease, living expenses in key areas such as housing and food remain high.

Food prices: October 2024 saw a 2.8% year-on-year increase in food prices, with fresh vegetables alone rising by 2.2%. These cost hikes are straining the budgets of students managing limited finances.

Housing costs: Rent and shelter expenses grew by 4.9% year-on-year in July 2024, particularly impacting students in cities like Toronto and Vancouver, where rental rates are among the highest in the country.

Fuel and energy prices: Volatile energy costs have added to the financial uncertainty for many students.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government is facing public criticism over the rising cost of living, which affects both Canadian citizens and international students. In response to the housing affordability crisis, the government has implemented a cap on international student visas, with fewer than 300,000 permits expected to be issued this year compared to approximately 437,000 in 2023.

Balancing Costs with Part-Time Work

The opportunity to work part-time has become increasingly crucial for international students trying to manage elevated living costs. Minimum wage rates, which vary by province, provide some financial relief. As of 2024, minimum hourly wages in key provinces and territories are:

Ontario: CAD 17.20

Alberta: CAD 15.00

British Columbia: CAD 17.40

Manitoba: CAD 15.80

Nunavut: CAD 19.00, the highest in the country as of January 1, 2024

With the increased work limit, students can better navigate the financial challenges posed by high living expenses and inflation. While this adjustment aims to improve students’ financial stability, it also emphasizes the importance of maintaining academic commitments alongside employment.

Canada Uncovers Fraudulent Visa Letters: Thousands of Indian Students Face Deportation

November 22, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

On November 15, an official from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) revealed that 10,000 acceptance letters submitted by foreign students entering Canada on student visas were fraudulent. This alarming discovery could result in the deportation of approximately 7,000 to 8,000 Indian students, with reports suggesting that around 80% of these counterfeit letters were linked to students from Gujarat and Punjab.

Visa expert Pankaj Patel highlighted the potential consequences, stating, “If the acceptance letters submitted by the students are found to be bogus, their admission will be cancelled, and they will be sent back to India.” He further noted that the Canadian government, led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, is expected to adopt a stringent approach to address such cases, particularly in light of recent diplomatic tensions between Canada and India.

The fraudulent letters expose the troubling operations of unscrupulous visa consultancy firms, which issue fake acceptance documents, deceiving students and their families. Many families reportedly spent as much as ₹25 lakh to fund their children’s education in Canada, only to face the devastating reality of deportation.

The IRCC official shared additional findings from their investigation of 5 lakh acceptance letters over the past 10 months. Of these, 93% were verified as genuine, while 2% were deemed fraudulent. For another 1% of applicants, admissions were cancelled, and the remaining cases involved institutions that failed to provide necessary documentation.

This issue highlights the urgent need for stricter regulations and oversight in the visa consultancy industry to prevent such scams, which jeopardize the future of thousands of aspiring students and strain international relations.

MIT Announces Tuition-Free Education for Most Incoming Students, Expanding Access to Top-Tier Education

November 21, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has announced a groundbreaking policy to offer the majority of its incoming undergraduate students a tuition-free education, a move aimed at easing financial barriers for talented students. Starting next fall, students with family incomes under $200,000 will be eligible for tuition-free enrollment. This threshold covers about 80% of MIT’s incoming classes, the university stated.

For families earning less than $100,000 annually, MIT will go a step further, covering not only tuition but also housing, dining, fees, books, and personal expenses. This comprehensive support aims to make the MIT experience entirely cost-free for these students.

“MIT’s distinctive model of education — intense, demanding, and rooted in science and engineering — has profound practical value to our students and to society,” said MIT President Sally Kornbluth in a press release. She emphasized the institution’s commitment to ensuring that financial constraints do not hinder access to an MIT education for talented students.

Rising Costs and a Historic Decision

MIT’s annual tuition was $57,986 for the 2022–2023 academic year, significantly higher than the national average of $39,400 for private four-year institutions, according to the Education Data Initiative. Despite this steep cost, the university has consistently worked to make its education accessible. Stu Schmill, MIT’s dean of admissions and student financial services, highlighted the significance of this new initiative, stating, “We believe MIT should be the preeminent destination for the most talented students in the country interested in an education centered on science and technology, and accessible to the best students regardless of their financial circumstances.”

Prioritizing Need-Based Aid

MIT already stands out among U.S. universities for its financial aid policies. It is one of nine institutions that do not consider a student’s ability to pay during the admissions process. Additionally, MIT does not require students on financial aid to take loans and avoids providing admissions advantages to children of alumni or donors.

The tuition-free initiative is supported by generous donations from MIT alumni and benefactors, demonstrating a collective effort to make education more affordable. Schmill, an MIT graduate from 1986, noted that while the “sticker price” of education has risen since his time as a student, the availability of need-based financial aid has made it more accessible than ever before.

Kornbluth encouraged prospective students to pursue their dreams without hesitation, adding, “To every student out there who dreams of coming to MIT: Don’t let concerns about cost stand in your way.” This bold financial aid initiative reaffirms MIT’s commitment to equity and accessibility, ensuring that financial circumstances do not hinder access to one of the world’s top educational institutions.

International Students Face Challenges Despite Growth in U.S. Enrollment

November 20, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The United States continues to attract a significant number of international students, cementing its status as a global hub for higher education. The Open Doors Report for the 2023-2024 academic year reveals a 7% increase in international students, bringing the total to 1,126,690 from over 210 countries. While the appeal of U.S. education remains strong, these students face numerous hurdles, particularly in securing work authorization and navigating immigration policies.

Graduate Students and Optional Practical Training at All-Time Highs

The latest data showcases notable trends in enrollment and work participation. The number of international graduate students reached a record 502,291, marking an 8% increase. Similarly, students participating in Optional Practical Training (OPT), a program allowing them to gain work experience in their field, rose by 22% to 242,782, the highest ever recorded.

Undergraduate numbers, however, dipped slightly to 342,875, reflecting a 1% decrease, while non-degree enrollments, which include exchange and intensive English programs, declined by 12% to 38,742 after a substantial 28% rise the previous year.

India Overtakes China as Top-Sending Country

For the first time since 2009, India surpassed China as the largest source of international students in the U.S. India and China collectively accounted for more than half of all international students. Indian students reached 331,602, a 23% increase, driven by graduate-level enrollments (up 19% to 196,567) and those in OPT (up 41% to 97,556).

Meanwhile, Chinese student numbers fell by 4% to 277,398. Despite the decline, China remained the top source for undergraduate (87,551) and non-degree (5,517) students. OPT participation by Chinese students grew 12%, reaching 61,552.

Strong New Enrollments Amid Persistent Barriers

New international student enrollments maintained pre-pandemic levels, with 298,705 joining in 2023-24. However, challenges remain, particularly around work opportunities. Work authorization is vital not only for financial reasons but also to gain experience in an increasingly globalized job market. Unfortunately, F-1 visa restrictions and cumbersome processes often hinder students from accessing meaningful work opportunities.

Work Authorization Options and Limitations

International students on F-1 visas have three main avenues for employment: on-campus work, OPT, and Curricular Practical Training (CPT). On-campus work is the simplest but limited to 20 hours per week during the semester and 40 hours during breaks.

OPT and CPT offer more substantial opportunities but come with challenges. OPT allows students to work in their field of study for up to 12 months, with an additional 24-month extension for STEM students. CPT, tied to specific academic requirements, mandates university approval. However, securing these authorizations is not straightforward.

Bureaucratic Delays Pose Significant Hurdles

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) often faces backlogs, delaying work authorization for students. For OPT, students must apply 90 days before program completion, but approvals can take an additional90 days or more.

A 2023 survey by the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) found that 40% of international students experienced delays exceeding three months for OPT approval, with some waiting up to six months. These delays create financial strain and limit students’ ability to gain critical practical experience.

Policy Uncertainty Adds to Challenges

Shifting immigration policies under successive U.S. administrations exacerbate the difficulties. The Trump administration introduced measures restricting work opportunities for foreign nationals, including international students. Although many of these were rescinded under President Biden, the inconsistency leaves students uncertain about their future prospects.

Data from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security indicates that only 24% of international students on F-1 visas secured OPT positions in the 2022-2023 academic year, underscoring the competitive nature of the process.

Post-Graduation Employment Barriers

Transitioning from an F-1 visa to an H-1B work visa after graduation is a significant challenge. The H-1B program caps annual visas at 85,000, with applications processed through a lottery system. In 2023, the acceptance rate for the H-1B visa lottery was just 22%, illustrating the difficulties even for students with job offers.

Financial and Mental Health Impacts

The inability to work exacerbates financial pressures for many international students, impacting both their academic performance and mental health. According to the 2023 International Student Economic Impact Study, 58% of students reported anxiety or depression due to financial and work-related constraints.

These issues underline the importance of work authorization not only for career advancement but also for overall well-being.

Key Work Authorization Pathways for International Students

Work Authorisation Type	Requirements	Duration	Restrictions
On-Campus Employment	Must be enrolled full-time	Limited to 20 hours per week during term, 40 hours per week during breaks	Can only work for the university or affiliated institutions
Optional Practical Training (OPT)	Must be in final year of study	12 months (with a possible 24-month extension for STEM students)	Employment must be directly related to field of study
Curricular Practical Training (CPT)	Must be enrolled in a course requiring practical training	Varies	Must be part of curriculum, and may require prior approval from university

Navigating the Way Forward

Addressing the barriers international students face requires a multi-pronged approach. Policymakers and universities must advocate for streamlined processes, clearer regulations, and expanded opportunities. For students, staying informed and seeking guidance from university offices can mitigate some challenges.

As a vital component of the U.S. educational ecosystem, international students contribute significantly to academic and professional communities. Ensuring their success benefits not only the students but also the broader U.S. economy and society. As one student succinctly put it, “Navigating work authorization complexities is not just a personal challenge but a reflection of broader systemic issues that need urgent attention.”

By tackling these obstacles, the U.S. can reinforce its position as the premier destination for global talent, fostering a mutually beneficial relationship between students and their host nation.

International Students in U.S. Universities Hit Record High Despite Political Concerns

November 19, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The number of international students enrolled in U.S. colleges and universities reached an unprecedented level during the 2023-24 academic year, according to a report from the Institute of International Education (IIE). The report highlighted that 1.1 million foreign students pursued higher education in the U.S., reflecting a 6.6% rise compared to the previous year.

A significant portion of these students hailed from China and India, with India surpassing China as the leading source of international students for the first time since 2009. California continued to be the most popular state for international students, hosting the largest share of this demographic. Among California’s academic institutions, prestigious universities such as UCLA, UC Berkeley, UC San Diego, and the University of Southern California attracted the highest numbers. Notably, while Chinese students outnumbered their Indian peers in California, the national trend saw Indian students leading.

The report also shed light on a notable 13.1% increase in students from African countries, bringing their total to 56,780. This group included students from Ghana, Nigeria, Kenya, Ethiopia, and South Africa. Meanwhile, East Asia sent 365,369 students to the U.S., with 277,398 coming from China alone—a 4.2% decline compared to the previous year. Other contributors from the region included Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.

In contrast, the number of students from Europe showed minimal fluctuation, growing by just 0.8% to reach 90,600. South and Central Asia sent a combined total of 386,260 students, with 331,602 from India alone, representing a 23.3% year-over-year increase. Additional contributors from the region included Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, with the latter accounting for 702 students.

A key factor behind the surge in Indian students was a 41% rise in participants of the “Optional Practical Training” (OPT) program, according to the IIE report. The OPT extension, tied to student visas, allows foreign students to gain work experience during or after their studies, making it an attractive option for Indian students seeking global exposure.

While the current numbers reflect growing interest in U.S. education, some experts have expressed concerns about potential declines under former President Donald Trump’s administration should he return to office. During his first term, foreign student enrollment dropped by 15%, largely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, policies such as the travel ban targeting several Muslim-majority countries, a trade conflict with China, and increased scrutiny of Chinese scholars were also cited as contributing factors.

John Aubrey Douglass, a senior research fellow at UC Berkeley’s Center for Studies in Higher Education, highlighted the impact of these policies on the global perception of the U.S. as a welcoming destination. He noted, “There is now a perception throughout the world that the U.S. is not the open society once perceived internationally, and no longer friendly to foreign students generally.”

Trump’s campaign promises during the 2024 election season, including mass deportations of undocumented immigrants, have added to the uncertainty surrounding international student numbers.

However, not all experts believe a second Trump term would significantly alter the trajectory of foreign student enrollment. Allan E. Goodman, CEO of the Institute of International Education, pointed out that enrollment trends have historically shown resilience. “International enrollment has tended to increase over time,” Goodman remarked during a briefing. He added that dips have typically occurred only during extraordinary events, such as the 9/11 terror attacks or the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Despite the political uncertainty, the record-breaking 2023-24 figures underscore the enduring appeal of U.S. higher education among international students. Its globally recognized institutions, advanced research opportunities, and diverse cultural experiences continue to make the U.S. a preferred destination for students worldwide.

India Leads Asia in QS University Rankings 2025, Cementing Academic Excellence

November 18, 2024November 18, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The QS Asia University Rankings 2025 have highlighted a significant milestone for India’s higher education landscape, marking the country’s growing prominence on the global academic stage. For the second consecutive year, Indian universities have surpassed their Chinese counterparts in representation, establishing India as the most represented nation in Asia. A total of 163 Indian institutions feature among the continent’s best, including 14 IITs, one IIIT, seven NITs, and 141 state universities, deemed-to-be universities, and AICTE-approved institutes. This achievement underscores India’s emergence as a global leader in education, made possible by innovative policies, a sustained focus on research, and relentless pursuit of academic excellence across a diverse range of institutions.

NEP 2020’s Transformative Impact

The rise of Indian universities in these rankings is a testament to the transformative influence of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. By redefining the goals and methods of education, NEP 2020 has propelled Indian institutions to international standards in research, innovation, and industry collaboration. Its emphasis on flexibility, interdisciplinary approaches, and lifelong learning has created an environment where universities excel not only in pedagogy but also in meaningful contributions to cutting-edge research.

This progressive policy has yielded remarkable results. Over the last three years, Indian universities have shown a 40% improvement in their rankings. “The policy’s emphasis on fostering innovation and creating a sustainable education ecosystem is evident in these achievements,” notes an expert. Furthermore, the NEP aligns with the goals of the Viksit Bharat initiative, which envisions India as a global leader by 2047. This initiative focuses on achieving intellectual and economic self-reliance through robust investments in academic infrastructure and a commitment to indigenous research and innovation.

Progress in Research

Indian universities have made tremendous strides in research, producing transformative outcomes that resonate on a global scale. The country’s progress in the Global Innovation Index, climbing from the 81st position in 2015 to 39th in 2024, exemplifies its emergence as a knowledge-driven economy. Additionally, the number of patent filings surged to 83,000 in 2023, reflecting a 31% increase since 2014.

India’s burgeoning research ecosystem is further evidenced by its global standing in research productivity. In 2023, Indian scholars published 1.3 million research papers, positioning the country among the top four nations in terms of output. These contributions are particularly notable in STEM fields, where Indian institutions are providing solutions to critical global challenges such as climate change, sustainable energy, and environmental resilience. Prestigious institutions like IITs and IISc Bangalore are leading these efforts, achieving recognition for their academic rigor and groundbreaking research.

“The quality of research emanating from Indian universities is a testament to the country’s focus on addressing real-world problems,” stated a senior academician. Such achievements have been acknowledged by the QS rankings, which recognize the growing prominence of Indian institutions in global academia.

Enhanced Academic Infrastructure

The Indian government’s substantial investment in higher education infrastructure has played a pivotal role in this academic resurgence. Modern facilities and cutting-edge resources have transformed India’s top universities into hubs for intellectual activity, attracting the nation’s brightest minds and an increasing number of international scholars.

While internationalisation is still a work in progress, initiatives under NEP 2020 aim to bring a larger global audience—both faculty and students—to Indian campuses by 2030. This has already begun to elevate the global profile of Indian universities, further reflected in their improved performance across QS indicators such as faculty expertise, research citations, and employer reputation.

Notably, 21 Indian institutions now feature in the QS Asia top 200 rankings. Among these, IIT Delhi, IIT Madras, and IISc Bangalore continue to rise in prominence, bolstering India’s reputation as a global education hub. “The strides made by these institutions signal India’s growing influence in shaping the global academic landscape,” remarked an education analyst.

The Road Ahead

India’s success in the QS Asia University Rankings 2025 is more than an accolade—it is a call to action for sustained excellence. As India cements its place in the global academic arena, the focus must remain on nurturing talent and fostering research that addresses the pressing challenges of our times. From technological innovation to environmental sustainability, Indian institutions are well-positioned to lead efforts that benefit society at large.

The story of India’s academic rise is rooted in a vision of resilience and determination. By leveraging policies like NEP 2020, embracing initiatives such as Viksit Bharat, and fostering an academic community dedicated to progress, the country is building an education system that is not only inclusive and future-ready but also capable of shaping the global intellectual landscape.

This historic achievement in the QS rankings symbolizes a new era for Indian education—a journey that combines innovation, research, and collaboration to unlock the nation’s full potential.

Empowering Education: Dr. Geetha Murali’s Mission to Break Barriers for Girls and Children Worldwide

November 17, 2024November 22, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation, Women 0

Dr. Geetha Murali’s journey with Room to Read, an organization dedicated to ending illiteracy and gender inequality, is deeply personal. As CEO, Murali’s commitment to transforming the lives of children through education stems from her belief in its power to break cycles of poverty and inequality globally.

“We’ve done a lot of reflection on [the] skill sets that children need, which are sort of those gatekeeper, foundational skills that allow [them] to overcome other limitations in their lives, and when you look at young children… the fundamental skill set you need is being able to read,” Murali shared with CNBC’s “Make It.” She emphasized how literacy opens up endless opportunities for learning and development. “Once you’re able to read, all of a sudden, the world opens up to you, and you can develop the learning pathways that can help you make good, informed choices.”

This insight is critical when considering the scale of the global literacy crisis. According to UNESCO’s 2024 report, about 754 million adults around the world remain illiterate, with two-thirds of them being women. Furthermore, an alarming 250 million children were not enrolled in school in 2023. To combat these challenges, Room to Read has been at the forefront of addressing foundational education gaps, having reached over 45 million children across 24 countries since its inception in 2000. The organization has invested approximately $850 million in improving foundational learning, a mission Murali has spearheaded since she joined the organization in 2009. Her leadership has been recognized by CNBC’s “Changemakers: Women Transforming Business,” a list that honors women whose work has made a lasting impact on the business world.

Murali’s passion for education and social impact is rooted in her personal history. Born in New York, she had access to a quality education—an opportunity her mother, raised in India, was denied. Murali’s family background reflects the stark contrast between her own educational experiences and those of her mother. “We came from a family where child marriage was quite the norm,” Murali explained. Her grandmothers were married at ages two and 14. Murali’s mother, despite her brilliance and the fact that she completed high school by age 12, faced societal pressure to marry instead of continuing her education. Although she harbored dreams of furthering her studies, her father prioritized sending their son to university over her education.

“There were three girls before him, and so with that, my mom kind of had this real sense of injustice,” Murali recalled. Her mother’s rebellious spirit led her to take matters into her own hands by attending community classes and eventually joining the Indian Army as a nurse. This decision became her gateway to the United States, where she worked hard to earn a degree and later became a successful biostatistician. Murali believes that her mother’s defiance against societal expectations created a ripple effect, leading to greater educational opportunities for the next generation in her family. “One decision that she made to not get married really created that ripple effect for an entire generation,” Murali remarked.

Murali’s mother’s perseverance and commitment to education inspired her throughout her own life. By age 22, Murali had earned a bachelor’s degree in biostatistics and a master’s degree from the University of California, Berkeley, all while working in the pharmaceutical industry. However, despite her early career successes, Murali felt unfulfilled. She questioned whether this path would truly bring her the satisfaction she sought. “I was, like, early 20s, with a great job, kind of looking around for the first time, going: ‘Is this really what I’m going to do for the next 45 years of my life?'” This inner conflict led her to pivot her career towards social impact.

Murali’s transition from the pharmaceutical industry to the social sector was sparked by her academic research. During her time at UC Berkeley, she began to explore South Asian studies and made several trips to India. These experiences opened her eyes to the real-life struggles faced by communities there. In one memorable conversation, Murali spoke with parents about basic community needs. “Some of the most meaningful [experiences] were really when we were doing surveys with parents… and when we were talking about expectations from government — it turned into expectations for me,” she said. The parents’ simple yet pressing requests, such as the need for streetlights or local schools, made Murali realize the importance of addressing these issues directly. “In the end, all the conversation we could have about… the various concepts that we were applying through my PhD process was not as important as the fact that I couldn’t get a light on the street,” she added.

Her experiences in India reaffirmed her resolve to pursue a career in social impact, which eventually led her to Room to Read. Murali’s leadership has kept the organization grounded in its mission to make measurable, direct change. Reflecting on her career, Murali shared several key lessons she has learned along the way: “What I try to share with others is that we’re not limited by what came before us. The human being, if given the basics… you are capable of so much more than you really think you are.” Her belief in the power of pushing beyond perceived limits has become a cornerstone of her leadership style.

Murali attributes her success to a combination of hard work and bold decision-making. “I wasn’t afraid of hard work. I was willing to put the hours in, and I was very achievement oriented,” she explained. As she gained confidence in her leadership, Murali became less concerned with incremental changes and more focused on taking bold steps to create lasting impact. “I’m sort of at the point where I believe that these basic rights should be a given, and the moves we have to make must be bold [in order] to make them happen,” she said.

To young people, Murali offers advice that emphasizes adaptability and pragmatism. “I think a plan is good, but not over planning. Like a GPS can be helpful, but don’t be afraid to do some off roading,” she suggests. Building strong, functional skill sets early in life is essential, as these skills can be applied in diverse fields and career paths. “In the end, having really strong, functional skill sets that you can apply is really the way that I would start my career,” she said.

Room to Read has achieved significant milestones under Murali’s leadership, including distributing over 42 million books and launching initiatives like “She Creates Change,” a project promoting gender equality through animation and live-action film. In addition to its foundational learning efforts, the organization places a strong emphasis on empowering adolescent girls with the skills they need to overcome challenges like early marriage, violence, and trafficking. “They have to figure out how to navigate in very practical terms and be able to negotiate with their families, negotiate with their communities to keep in school,” Murali noted.

Dr. Geetha Murali’s life and work demonstrate the transformative power of education, particularly for girls and young women, in breaking the barriers of illiteracy and gender inequality. Through Room to Read, she continues to create lasting change in the lives of millions of children, ensuring that education remains a powerful tool for social mobility and empowerment.

Global Employability Rankings Highlight Universities Grooming Workforce-Ready Graduates

November 17, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The latest edition of the Global Employability University Ranking and Survey (GEURS) 2025 underscores the growing importance of adaptability and practical work experience for graduates entering the workforce. Compiled by French consultancy Emerging in partnership with Times Higher Education (THE), the rankings reveal the factors employers prioritize when assessing graduate readiness for modern workplaces.

The survey highlights that graduates with work experience or internships are becoming increasingly desirable to employers. This preference reflects a broader trend in which practical exposure complements traditional academic skills. Alongside experience, other key attributes sought by employers include adaptability to emerging technologies (cited by 45.9% of employers) and collaboration abilities like communication and teamwork (valued by 45.1%).

GEURS remains the only ranking system that evaluates universities globally based on their ability to produce employable graduates. The 2025 edition is the most comprehensive to date, gathering 129,126 votes from 13,240 operational and international managers across 33 countries.

Growing Prominence of Asian Universities

Asian universities have made notable strides in employability rankings, with 52 institutions appearing in the top 250, three more than last year. This year, Indian universities have delivered an especially strong performance, with 10 institutions in the top 250. India’s success is attributed to the technological focus of its institutions, which appeals to international employers. The Indian Institute of Technology Delhi leads among Indian universities at 28th place, while the Indian Institute of Science has climbed to 47th, securing a spot in the top 50.

Chinese universities continue their ascent, with Peking University rising three places to 11th and Tsinghua University advancing two spots to 19th. These improvements demonstrate the growing recognition of Chinese institutions for their contributions to employability.

Consistency Among US and UK Institutions

The United States and the United Kingdom continue to dominate the top rankings. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) hold the first and second spots, respectively, reaffirming their excellence. Despite a long-term decline over the past 15 years, American universities appear to have stabilized their presence, with 52 institutions in the top 250—a slight increase from recent years.

The University of Cambridge leads UK universities, ranking fifth, followed by the University of Oxford in seventh place. Overall, 13 UK institutions are represented in the rankings.

US and UK universities account for half of the top 20 spots. The remainder of the top tier features institutions from Germany, Japan, Singapore, China, Canada, Spain, France, and Switzerland, reflecting the diverse geographical spread of excellence.

Mixed Trends in Canada

Canada exhibits a mix of stability and decline in employability rankings. While the University of Toronto (14th), McGill University (31st), and the University of British Columbia (36th) maintain their positions, other institutions like Université de Montréal/HEC and McMaster University have dropped by 12 and three places, respectively.

Progress in Other Regions

In Latin America, Mexico leads the region with three universities in the top 250, while Brazil and Colombia also make significant contributions.

The Gulf region continues to show improvement, with the United Arab Emirates University debuting at 230th place. Qatar University, a consistent performer, has climbed into the top 150 globally, remaining the sole representative of its nation.

A Global Perspective

This year’s rankings feature universities from over 40 countries and regions, showcasing the global emphasis on employability. These include nations such as Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Belgium, Australia, South Africa, and Taiwan, among others.

Sandrine Belloc, managing partner at Emerging, emphasized the transformative impact of employability on higher education. She remarked, “The mounting global emphasis on employability is driving a transformative shift as universities and employers increasingly unite to equip graduates with essential skills for today’s dynamic workforce. It’s inspiring to see this commitment to skill alignment expanding globally, giving a growing number of students access to the competencies and opportunities needed to thrive in an interconnected job market.”

Top 10 universities in the Global Employability University Ranking and Survey 2025

University	Country/region	Rank 2025	Rank last year
Massachusetts Institute of Technology	US	1	2
California Institute of Technology	US	2	1
Stanford University	US	3	3
Harvard University	US	4	5
University of Cambridge	UK	5	4
Princeton University	US	6	6
University of Oxford	UK	7	8
The University of Tokyo	Japan	8	7
National University of Singapore	Singapore	9	9
Imperial College London	US	10	11

Top 10 countries in the Global Employability University Ranking and Survey 2025

Country/region	Rank 2025	Number of unis 2025	Number of unis compared with last year	Number of votes 2025	Score 2025
US	1	52	+1	28,391	22.01%
France	2	19	0	10,937	8.48%
Germany	3	20	+1	10,085	7.82%
UK	4	13	0	8,167	6.33%
China	5	15	+2	7,799	6.05%
Canada	6	10	-1	5,361	4.16%
Australia	7	9	0	5,125	3.97%
Japan	8	9	0	4,541	3.52%
South Korea	9	7	0	4,508	3.49%
Switzerland	10	7	0	4,408	3.42%

The GEURS rankings reaffirm the critical role of higher education institutions in preparing graduates for the evolving demands of the global workforce, emphasizing the need for adaptability, practical experience, and collaboration in modern careers.

Yogesh Joshi Appointed as First Indian Community Endowed Chair at UCF’s India Center

November 16, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The University of Central Florida (UCF) has named international affairs expert Yogesh Joshi as the inaugural Indian Community endowed chair and director of The India Center. The appointment was marked by an investiture ceremony on November 4.

The India Center, a part of UCF’s School of Politics, Security, and International Affairs, was established in 2012. Its mission is to enhance understanding of modern India’s impact on global affairs. Yogesh Joshi, who takes on the prestigious role, brings a wealth of expertise from his career as a leading academic in international relations and Indian foreign policy.

Before joining UCF, Joshi spearheaded the National Security and Foreign Policy program at the Institute of South Asian Studies, housed at the National University of Singapore. He also served as a faculty member at Yale-NUS College, furthering his academic contributions in the field.

During the ceremony, Maggy Tomova, the Dean of the College of Sciences, underscored the event’s significance and its alignment with UCF’s strategic goals. “Community and culture are key focus areas for UCF’s strategic plan, and today truly represents community and culture in action,” she remarked.

The event also acknowledged the philanthropic efforts of several families, notably the Deshpande, Mehta, and Toleti families. Their generous contributions were critical in making the endowed chair a reality.

UCF provost Michael D. Johnson, speaking at the event, highlighted the growing presence and contributions of the Indian American community within the university. “UCF is enriched by a significant number of Indian American faculty, staff, and students. This endowed professorship is a tremendous investment in The India Center’s future,” Johnson stated, emphasizing the importance of Joshi’s role.

In his address, Yogesh Joshi presented his vision for The India Center, outlining its focus on examining India’s global influence in areas such as science, technology, and international relations. “Together, we can empower and make real change in the lives of many Americans and Indians,” Joshi said, reinforcing his commitment to advancing the center’s mission.

Joshi’s academic credentials include a doctorate in International Politics from Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He is also an accomplished author, having co-written three notable books on India’s nuclear strategy and foreign policy.

The establishment of this endowed chair and the appointment of Yogesh Joshi is a significant step forward for UCF, reflecting the university’s dedication to fostering cultural understanding and international scholarship.

Canada Ends Fast-Track Study Permit Program Amid Resource Strains and Housing Crisis

November 10, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Canada abruptly announced the end of its widely utilized Student Direct Stream (SDS) program, effective from November 8, 2024, which has facilitated quicker study permit approvals for thousands of international students over the years. The SDS was launched in 2018 by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) to streamline the application process for study permits for students from specific countries who met particular financial and language requirements.

The program applied to students from 14 countries, including India, China, and the Philippines, and offered a simplified visa process provided that applicants fulfilled certain prerequisites. Among these were holding a Canadian Guaranteed Investment Certificate (GIC) worth $20,635 CAD and achieving qualifying scores in either English or French language proficiency tests. This streamlined system allowed many applicants to receive study permits within a matter of weeks, whereas the standard application process can take up to eight weeks or more for Indian applicants.

The termination of the SDS reflects Canada’s recent shift in policy aimed at controlling the influx of international students, largely due to the country’s ongoing challenges with housing shortages and strained public resources. As part of its broader adjustments for 2024, Canada has set a cap of 437,000 new study permits for 2025, covering educational programs at all levels, including postgraduate studies.

In addition to terminating the SDS, Canada has introduced stricter language and academic criteria for students seeking eligibility for the Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP) program. The changes also restrict work permit access for the spouses of international students and impose higher financial proof requirements for applicants. The measures are part of Canada’s efforts to ease the pressures on its housing market and public services while managing the increasing number of foreign students in the country. Canada hosted a record 807,000 international students on study permits in 2023, and the government aims to balance this figure with available resources.

With the SDS program no longer available, international students will now experience longer wait times and must meet more stringent eligibility requirements. Advisors recommend that students commence their visa application processes much earlier to adapt to these more restrictive conditions.

A Call to Action: Prevent Hypertension — Engage in Salt Reduction

November 7, 2024November 8, 2024 Dr. Surender Reddy Neravetla & Dr. Soumya Reddy NeravetlaHealth, Education 0

Hypertension is the leading preventable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality worldwide. In 2019, 1.72 million deaths and 40.54 million DALYs were caused by CVD due to high dietary sodium globally, representing a 41.08% and 33.06% increase since 1990. In 2023, this estimate further increased to 1.89 million deaths associated with excess sodium consumption. Both India and the United States of America top the list of most burdened countries.

This data is alarming considering the cause has been well known for decades and can be relatively easily addressed. These studies do not call for complex medication regimens or treatments. The totality of the evidence strongly supports a population-wide reduction in salt intake (AHA). Salt reduction causes a dose-dependent reduction in blood pressure: the lower the salt intake, the lower the blood pressure (AHA).

Yet, medical organizations and governments are barely engaged in salt reduction to prevent hypertension. It is reflected in WHO’s cry for help: “massive efforts needed to reduce salt intake and protect lives”. Only nine countries (Brazil, Chile, Czech Republic, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Spain and Uruguay) have a comprehensive package of recommended policies to reduce sodium intake. WHO again says: “Reducing sodium intake is one of the most cost-effective measures to improve health and reduce the burden of

non-communicable diseases: for every US $1 invested in scaling up sodium reduction interventions, there will be a return of at least US$12.”

In India, of the estimated 220 million people with hypertension, only 12% have their blood pressure under control. Hypertension kills more adults than any other cause and is readily preventable and treatable. The India Hypertension Control Initiative (IHCI) is principally

engaged in improving better diagnosis and treatment of hypertension.

But what about prevention? It’s time to look at high blood pressure as a preventable disease. India only received a score of 2 (out of 4) from WHO due to its lack of mandatory sodium declaration policy. WHO estimates that 7 million lives could be saved worldwide by 2030 if countries can adopt appropriate sodium reduction, however few countries are on track. To achieve this goal WHO recommends mandatory legislation that includes maximum sodium content limit, marketing restrictions, labelling and fiscal policies.

Global health care agencies must prioritize salt reduction as the critical strategy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease globally. Adding salt to food confers no known nutritional benefit, while increasing the risk of hypertension and many other deadly or disabling diseases. It’s time to tackle the root cause.

Indian Universities Shine in QS Asia University Rankings 2025, With IIT Delhi Leading the Pack

November 6, 2024November 7, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) recently unveiled its World University Rankings: Asia 2025, highlighting a notable presence for Indian institutions. A total of 22 universities from India made it to the list of 984 recognized institutions across Asia, showcasing the country’s growing academic prowess in the region. Among them, six universities earned spots within the top 100, emphasizing their rising standards and international reputation.

The Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD) claimed the highest rank among Indian universities, securing the 44th position in Asia. This achievement is a notable improvement and sets IITD as the leader among Indian institutions, underlining its continuous academic and research developments. Following IITD, the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB) ranks 48th, while the Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM) secured the 56th spot. These institutions represent the top three universities from India in the Asia 2025 QS rankings.

Alongside IITD, IITM, and IITB, three other Indian universities also appear in the top 100. These include the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IIT-KGP), ranking at 60, the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) at 62, and the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK), holding the 67th spot. Collectively, these six universities are recognized for their academic and research excellence within the broader Asian educational landscape.

Within the Southern Asian category of the QS rankings, which comprises universities from both India and Pakistan, Indian universities secured strong positions. IITD again led within this subcategory, ranking first among the 308 universities included from Southern Asia. Additionally, seven out of the top 10 universities in this regional subset are from India, reflecting the strength and reputation of Indian institutions in comparison to their South Asian counterparts.

One prominent feature of the Southern Asian rankings was the performance of the National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST) in Islamabad, Pakistan. NUST shares the 6th position in this category alongside IIT Kanpur, showing a competitive edge within the South Asian academic scene.

QS ranks universities based on several parameters, assessing areas such as international faculty presence, the proportion of staff with PhDs, faculty-to-student ratios, and inbound and outbound student exchange programs. Additionally, universities are evaluated on their academic reputation, the number of citations per paper, papers per faculty member, international research networks, and the number of international students enrolled. Employer reputation also plays a significant role, as QS considers the employment prospects of graduates from each institution, further indicating the institutions’ contributions to both academia and industry.

The QS rankings serve as a valuable benchmark, helping Indian universities to measure their progress against top institutions across Asia.

Top U.S. Universities Offering the Best Career Prospects and Green Card Opportunities for International Students

November 5, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation, Immigration 0

A recent ranking highlights the U.S. universities providing the most favorable career outcomes and green card prospects for international students, focusing on key metrics like tuition costs, salaries, and permanent labor certification rates. Released by F1 Hire, a data analytics company specializing in employment outcomes for international talent, the F1 Hire Career Outcome University Ranking assesses which institutions offer the best return on investment for overseas students.

According to F1 Hire, the ranking is designed to “provide an objective benchmark of return on investment in university choices, allowing international students to better understand the financial and career outcomes linked to their education.” The company evaluated 275 U.S. universities, relying on four core criteria: average salary post-graduation, salary-to-tuition ratio, the ratio of international students who apply for permanent residency (PERM), and the total number of PERM applicants. These factors were used to determine the green card approval rates and return on investment, offering a unique perspective on how well universities prepare international students for long-term success in the U.S.

The top institutions based on these criteria are San Jose State University, Carnegie Mellon University, Stanford University, Princeton University, and Central Michigan University. Central Michigan University’s fifth-place position was a standout, as it typically ranks lower in conventional U.S. News and World Report rankings. However, the university’s strong green card approval rate has propelled it into the top five for international students seeking job stability and residency in the U.S.

California leads as the state with the most universities listed in the top 25, thanks to its Silicon Valley economy and high-tech industry opportunities. Three public universities and two University of California campuses, alongside three private institutions, place California as an attractive region for international students aiming for high salaries and strong career outcomes.

Among the prestigious Ivy League schools, seven of the eight made it into the top 25 of F1 Hire’s ranking. These include Princeton University at fourth place, Harvard University at ninth, Cornell University at 16th, University of Pennsylvania at 19th, Dartmouth College at 20th, Columbia University at 21st, and Yale University at 23rd. The high rankings of these Ivy League institutions are attributed to their elevated average salaries, selective admissions, and extensive resources, which contribute to their strong employment outcomes for international graduates.

Below is a detailed breakdown of the top 10 universities, their scores, and annual tuition costs for international students:

F1 Hire Ranking	University	Score (out of 100)	Annual Tuition for International Students
1	San Jose State University	100	$26,815
2	Carnegie Mellon University	94.7	$64,600
3	Stanford University	87.9	$65,910
4	Princeton University	85.3	$62,400
5	Central Michigan University	81.5	$21,600
6	California State University, Sacramento	80.6	$20,618
7	Georgia Institute of Technology	79.9	$34,485
8	University of Southern California	79.3	$70,000
9	Harvard University	76.5	$56,550
10	Northern Illinois University	73.5	$13,000

F1 Hire, which launched this ranking in 2023, includes only institutions with a minimum of 500 international students, aiming to reflect the schools that have the capacity and resources to support significant numbers of international enrollees. “As consumers of education services, international families deserve an objective benchmark before making expensive decisions about studying in the U.S.,” explained F1 Hire CEO Andrew Chen, in an interview with The PIE News.

Chen further remarked on the importance of including lesser-known universities that aren’t often recognized for their career outcomes, particularly for international students. “Many lesser-known, non-AAU universities consistently achieve positive career outcomes and deserve recognition,” he noted. This includes institutions such as Northern Illinois University, which has an incoming student GPA average of 3.4 out of 4, and Central Michigan University, which admits students with SAT scores ranging from 960 to 1210 and an average GPA of 3.5. These universities are ranked 273rd and 259th respectively in U.S. News among public universities, yet they stand out in this ranking due to their focus on career and residency outcomes.

The U.S. remains the world’s most popular study destination for international students, hosting over one million students from more than 200 countries and territories. In this global context, the U.S. continues to attract students, including approximately 21,900 from Vietnam, positioning Vietnam as the fifth-largest contributor to international student enrollment in the United States.

U.S. universities, however, come with high costs. For the 2024-2025 academic year, the average annual expense—including tuition and living costs—ranges from $11,000 to $43,000 according to U.S. News data.

9th Grader from Georgia Wins 3M Young Scientist Challenge with Pesticide Detection Device

October 31, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation, Youth 0

A talented ninth grader from Snellville, Georgia, has made headlines by winning the prestigious 3M Young Scientist Challenge after creating an innovative handheld device aimed at detecting pesticide residues on fruits and vegetables. Sirish Subash’s invention, an AI-based sensor named PestiSCAND, earned him the grand prize of $25,000 in cash, along with the title of “America’s Top Young Scientist.”

Sirish’s journey into invention was sparked by a simple yet profound question influenced by his mother’s insistence that he wash fruits before consuming them. This curious young mind began to wonder about the effectiveness of washing produce in removing harmful substances. His research revealed a concerning statistic: around 70% of all produce items carry pesticide residues that may be linked to severe health issues, including cancer and Alzheimer’s disease. Furthermore, he discovered that washing alone often fails to eliminate all traces of these harmful chemicals.

“If we could detect them, we could avoid consuming them, and reduce the risk of those health issues,” Sirish explained, emphasizing the motivation behind his invention.

The PestiSCAND device utilizes the principle of spectrophotometry, which involves measuring the light reflected off the surface of fruits and vegetables. Throughout his research, Sirish conducted tests on over 12,000 samples, including apples, spinach, strawberries, and tomatoes. The science behind his device relies on the fact that different materials will reflect and absorb varying wavelengths of light. By identifying the specific wavelengths associated with pesticide residues, PestiSCAND can effectively determine their presence.

After scanning the produce, the device employs an AI machine learning model to analyze the collected lightwaves for pesticide detection. The prototype demonstrated impressive performance, achieving a detection accuracy rate exceeding 85%, which fulfilled the project’s goals for both speed and effectiveness.

Sirish has ambitious plans for the future of his invention. He aims to refine the prototype further, with a target retail price of just $20 per unit. His goal is to bring the device to market by the time he embarks on his college journey.

As one of the nine finalists in this year’s competition, Sirish, who is currently attending the Gwinnett School of Math, Science, and Technology, devoted the last four months collaborating closely with one of the 3M scientists. These mentors provided invaluable one-on-one guidance to help him enhance his prototype and prepare for the final challenge.

During the concluding events at 3M’s global headquarters in St. Paul, Minnesota, Sirish’s hard work culminated in his victory. His achievement was met with admiration from 3M’s chief public affairs officer, Torie Clarke, who remarked, “I am beyond impressed and inspired by this year’s Young Scientist Challenge finalists who have demonstrated an incredible ability to develop creative solutions to some of the world’s most pressing challenges.”

With a passion for physics and engineering, Sirish has set his sights on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) as his dream school. He plans to allocate his winnings towards his college tuition, demonstrating his foresight and commitment to his education.

Sirish Subash’s story is not just one of triumph but also a testament to the power of curiosity and innovation. His work could potentially revolutionize the way consumers approach food safety, providing a much-needed solution to a widespread problem. The journey of this young scientist serves as an inspiration to others, illustrating how one question can lead to significant advancements in technology and public health.

International Students Eye U.S. Job Market Despite Degree Challenges and Salary Disparities

October 29, 2024October 31, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

America continues to draw international students seeking promising careers and citizenship. Many of these students, after completing studies in the United States, aspire to secure high-paying jobs that may eventually lead to green cards and permanent residency. However, U.S. employers consider two primary factors when hiring foreign talent: whether the candidate holds a U.S. or non-U.S. degree and the extent of their work experience.

A recent report by Intead and job search platform F1 Hire, titled Connecting Dots: How International Students Are Finding US Jobs, explores the salary outlook for international students aiming to secure U.S. employment after completing their studies. It reveals a notable discrepancy in pay based on where the degree was obtained. According to the report, “Those earning their degrees outside the U.S. and then applying for PERM visa status make a higher starting salary than international students earning their degrees in the U.S.” Interestingly, this trend has a few exceptions, specifically among students from China, Japan, and South Korea, where those with U.S.-based degrees generally earn more.

The report underscores a pattern in which international students who studied outside the United States often command a higher initial salary than their U.S.-educated counterparts, despite having similar career aspirations. This trend highlights that for many international students, completing a degree outside the U.S. may lead to better starting salaries in America compared to those who hold U.S.-based degrees. Nonetheless, U.S.-educated students seem to have an advantage in terms of required prior experience for job eligibility.

The report indicates that U.S. employers typically expect less work experience from international candidates with U.S.-obtained degrees compared to those who graduated from foreign institutions. On average, international students with U.S. degrees may need roughly one year less prior work experience. In certain cases, employers have filed PERM visa applications for international students with U.S. degrees who had as much as two years less experience than candidates with equivalent foreign qualifications. This difference suggests that while international students educated outside the U.S. may have a slight salary advantage, those educated in the U.S. may benefit from more lenient experience requirements.

When examining Indian students specifically, a notable trend emerges. On average, Indian graduates from institutions in India earn around 10% more than their peers who graduated from U.S. universities when employed in comparable roles. However, this additional earning potential comes with a significant tradeoff, as U.S. employers generally require Indian graduates with foreign degrees to have double the work experience of their U.S.-educated counterparts.

Five Indian-Origin Researchers Join National Academy of Medicine for Their Groundbreaking Contributions

October 25, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

In a significant milestone, five Indian-origin researchers were elected as members of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) at its recent annual meeting. This prestigious recognition, which includes 90 regular and 10 international inductees in the 2024 cohort, celebrates leaders in health and medicine for their pioneering research and impactful contributions. Being elected to NAM is regarded as one of the highest honors in the medical and health fields, highlighting the profound influence of these experts on global health care and research.

Among the distinguished group of newly inducted Indian-origin researchers, Dr. Nina Bhardwaj, Dr. Monika Kumari Goyal, Dr. Reshma Jagsi, Dr. Avindra Nath, and Dr. Uma M. Reddy have made exceptional contributions to their respective fields. Their work spans diverse areas including cancer immunology, pediatric emergency medicine, oncology, neurology, and maternal-fetal medicine.

Dr. Nina Bhardwaj, a professor at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, has been recognized for her groundbreaking research on human dendritic cells, an area that has substantially impacted cancer immunology. Her work in developing a cell-based cancer vaccine, which has gained FDA approval, represents a major advancement in cancer treatment. Reflecting on her achievements, Dr. Bhardwaj’s contributions to cancer and viral immunity have previously earned her the 2022 Lifetime Achievement in Cancer Research award from the American Association of Indian Scientists in Cancer Research. This accolade acknowledges her pivotal role in immunology and her ongoing work toward advancing cancer treatment options.

Dr. Monika Kumari Goyal, a professor specializing in pediatrics and emergency medicine at George Washington University, has directed her research toward understanding and addressing pediatric firearm injuries. Her work emphasizes the need to mitigate the effects of firearm violence on children’s health, a pressing issue in public health and medicine. Dr. Goyal’s research has also aimed at reducing health care disparities and fostering equity in treatment. Through her advocacy, she has significantly contributed to public health efforts to ensure accessible, equitable care for children affected by violence, pushing forward essential changes in pediatric emergency protocols.

Dr. Reshma Jagsi, chair of the radiation oncology department at Emory University, is renowned for her research on cancer outcome disparities, with a focus on gender-related issues. Her studies examine inequities faced by women within the field of oncology, as well as disparities in cancer treatment and patient outcomes. Dr. Jagsi’s work has fueled policy reforms aimed at promoting gender equity, both in the medical profession and in the treatment of cancer patients. By advocating for these changes, she has influenced national discussions around fairness in healthcare and has inspired structural shifts that address gender bias in oncology and related medical fields.

Dr. Avindra Nath, who holds an MD from Christian Medical College in India, has contributed substantial leadership and insight into the study of neurological infections, including COVID-19 and its long-term effects, commonly known as Long COVID. His expertise has broadened the understanding of neuroinfections, offering new perspectives on managing and treating infections that affect the nervous system. His research on COVID-19 neurological complications has proven particularly vital during the pandemic, as it provides a foundation for addressing the long-term impacts of the virus on brain health.

Dr. Uma M. Reddy, a professor at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, has focused her research on maternal-fetal health, particularly in understanding stillbirth, neonatal morbidity and mortality, and the intricacies of labor management. Her work has led to improved health outcomes for both mothers and infants, as her findings inform better practices in maternal and neonatal care. Dr. Reddy’s efforts have thus contributed significantly to advancing health care strategies that protect the well-being of expecting mothers and newborns, making a lasting impact in the field of obstetrics.

Victor J. Dzau, president of NAM, commended the achievements of the 2024 class of inductees, emphasizing the importance of their expertise. “Their expertise will be necessary to supporting NAM’s work to address the pressing health and scientific challenges we face today,” he stated, underscoring the essential role these researchers will play in advancing NAM’s mission and addressing global health challenges through their unique and critical perspectives.

IIT Kanpur Reconnects with Alumni in Chicago Through Its Flagship Initiative, ‘IIT Karvaan’

October 24, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

IIT Kanpur’s flagship initiative, ‘IIT Karvaan,’ aimed at reconnecting with its global alumni network, made a successful stop in Chicago recently. The event has already been successfully held in cities like New York and Washington D.C. The event in the ‘Windy City’ saw nearly 80 IIT Kanpur alumni from the Chicago area come together to celebrate their shared legacy and explore ways to strengthen their support and engagement with the institute’s future initiatives.

The highlight of the event was the presence of the Chief Guest, Consul General of India in Chicago, Mr. Somnath Ghosh. A proud alumnus of IIT Kanpur himself, Mr. Ghosh delivered a powerful message in his keynote address, urging alumni to shift their mindset from merely “Giving Back” to “Paying Back” to their alma mater. He framed this support not as charity but as an obligation—a duty owed to the institution that laid the foundation for their professional and personal success. His speech resonated strongly with attendees, fostering a renewed sense of responsibility and pride among the alumni. He also urged IIT Kanpur to look into ways to collaborate more with US universities.

The IIT Karvaan USA tour has also seen participation from some of IIT Kanpur’s most distinguished alumni, including Dr. Ruchir Puri, Chief Scientist of IBM Research, Mr. Muktesh Pant, Former CEO of Yum! China, and Mr. Arvind Krishna, CEO of IBM, among many others.

The event also featured senior leadership from IIT Kanpur, including Prof. Manindra Agrawal, Director; Prof. Braj Bhushan, Deputy Director; and Prof. Amey Karkare, Dean of Resources and Alumni, who shared updates on the institute’s recent achievements and upcoming initiatives. Their presence underscored the importance of alumni engagement and the pivotal role it plays in advancing IIT Kanpur’s mission.

“Our alumni are the backbone of our institute, and their achievements across the globe fill us with immense pride,” said Prof. Manindra Agrawal, Director IIT Kanpur. “Through initiatives like IIT Karvaan, we aim to strengthen our connections with them, harness their expertise, and collaboratively work towards the growth and global impact of IIT Kanpur. The enthusiasm and support we have received in Chicago and other cities reaffirm the strong bond we share with our alumni community.”

01 IIT Kanpur — IIT Kanpur alumni from the Chicago

The IITK Chicago Chapter leader, Mr. Nitin Maheshwari, also expressed gratitude for the strong turnout, stating, “IIT Karvaan has allowed us to rekindle connections and foster deeper engagement among our alumni. The energy in the room was palpable, and it is clear that the IIT Kanpur community is as strong as ever.” He also called for the alumni to come together and get involved in chapter activities.

As IIT Karvaan progresses through Seattle and the San Francisco Bay Area next, the event series stands as a powerful reminder of the enduring legacy of IIT Kanpur and the vital role alumni play in shaping its ongoing success. Each stop has not only celebrated the achievements of its distinguished alumni but also reinforced the collective responsibility to contribute to the institution’s growth and global impact. With each city, the IIT Kanpur family grows stronger, and the bonds deepen, paving the way for a brighter, shared future.

About IIT Kanpur:

The Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, established in 1959, holds the distinction of being recognized as an Institute of National Importance by the Government of India through an Act of Parliament. Renowned for its excellence in science and engineering education, IIT Kanpur has made significant contributions to research and development over the decades. Its expansive, lush green campus spans 1,050 acres and hosts a rich array of academic and research resources. The institute comprises 19 departments, 26 canters, three interdisciplinary programs, and two specialized schools across engineering, science, design, humanities, and management disciplines. With over 590 full-time faculty members and more than 9,500 students, IIT Kanpur continues to be a leader in fostering innovation and academic rigor.

For more information, please visit www.iitk.ac.in

THE World University Rankings 2025 Released Ahead of Time for Strategic Planning

October 22, 2024October 23, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The Times Higher Education (THE) has released its World University Rankings for 2025 earlier than expected, continuing a practice aimed at providing forward-looking analysis for universities, students, and researchers. This early release, which is based on data from the previous academic year, offers crucial insights for those involved in higher education, ensuring they can plan for the future effectively.

The decision to publish the rankings ahead of time is rooted in THE’s goal of presenting the most up-to-date and comprehensive data available. These rankings are typically released in advance to help guide students, researchers, and institutions in their decision-making processes. For the 2025 rankings, THE collected and analyzed data from the 2023-2024 academic year, and their early release allows these key stakeholders to prepare for the upcoming academic cycle.

By making the rankings public ahead of time, THE provides a valuable tool for students who are preparing their university applications. Having access to such detailed and forward-thinking data helps them make more informed decisions regarding which institutions to apply to, based on their interests and academic goals. For universities and colleges, these rankings serve as an important benchmark to measure their own performance relative to their peers around the globe.

Releasing the rankings early also helps academic institutions in their planning efforts, enabling them to set strategic goals for the next academic year and beyond. “The data collected helps not only prospective students but also the universities themselves,” THE noted, adding that “early access to such information gives everyone a head start in planning for the future.”

This practice aligns with THE’s commitment to providing transparency and critical data to the global academic community.

During Meeting with India’s Ministry of Health and NITI Aayog Officials, AAPI Leadership Emphasizes Importance of Family Practice Specialized Medical Education

October 20, 2024October 22, 2024 Ajay GhoshEducation, Health 0

India, home to one of the oldest medicinal systems in the world has made remarkable progress in streamlining and working towards enhancing medical education in recent years. As the world is evolving to meet the ever-changing needs, medical education in India is moving forward with the objective of enabling every medical graduate and postgraduate to be the best in the world.

Several changes are being made for graduate and post graduate medical education in Indian medical education system to be at par and for easy mobilization around the world, with the goal of making India the medical education hub for the world.

In this context, the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI), which has been leading efforts to help streamline medical education in India to meet the global standards, had a meeting on October 18^th, 2024 with the officials of the Indian Government during the ongoing Global Healthcare Summit in New Delhi, with the objective of advocating for and emphasizing the importance of Family Practice Specialized Medical Education in India.

AAPI delegation was led by Dr. Sateesh Kathula, President, AAPI, Dr. Lokesh Edara, Past Chairman of AAPI BOT and Global Medical Education, and Dr. Vasu Singh, AAPI Regional Director.

AAPI leaders met with the leadership council at National Institute for India Transformation (NITI) Aayog Bhavan, led by Dr. Vinod Paul, Medical Director, NITI. Key attendees included Dr. Abhijath Sheth, President of National Board of Medical Exams (NBME), Chair of National Medical Council; Ms. V. Hekali Zhimomi, Additional Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; Dr. B. Srinivas, Secretary, NMC; Dr. Subodh Kumar, Executive Director, NBEMS; Shri Rajib Kumar Sen, NITI Aayog Program Director.

Dr. Kathula shared with the Indian officials about the model of family medicine in the US and emphasized the need to expand family medicine departments and post graduate seats in India. He also shared the benefits of having family medicine in rural areas and small cities and making 2-3 year residency program mandatory after 5 1/2 years of medical education similar to the United States, which can improve quality of care significantly.

Dr. Kathula suggested that “Family medicine should not be a gatekeeper for referrals to specialists but rather they should be taking care most of the medical conditions including Pediatric and Obstetrics and Gynecology patients. In addition, he recommended creating incentives such as offering sub specialties like geriatrics, palliative care similar to the US, in order to attract more doctors towards family medicine. He said, “There should be clear distinction between general medicine and family medicine and change the name of general medicine to internal medicine to avoid confusion.”

In his presentation to the Indian officials, Dr. Lokesh Edara highlighted as to how in the Unted States and United Kingdom, there is an allocation of 25% of Post Graduate Medical Seats given to Family Practice. He advocated that Indian allocate a minimum of 25,000 per year to Family Practice PG Medical students, which will be a significant step towards enhancing healthcare in India. Describing the initiative as “a historic milestone and a testament to the commitment of AAPI towards Global Medical Education,” Dr. Lokesh Edara said, “This strategic move is crucial for strengthening primary healthcare and addressing the needs of diverse populations across the country.”

“AAPI is indeed a powerful platform for advocacy in healthcare. We encourage all the AAPI members to actively participate in these efforts. By collaborating and leveraging our collective voices, we can effectively advocate for policies and initiatives that enhance healthcare access, improve education, and support the well-being of communities both in India and the U.S. Your involvement can make a significant impact,” Dr. Edara added.

The high-ranking officials of the Government of India and NITI expressed support for such initiatives, and shared their openness to incorporate these suggestions, which are aimed at aligning with the vision for 2047, ensuring that every family in India receives the care from a trained Post Graduate in Family Medicine.

Dr. Vinod Paul reiterated that most of the MBBS Doctors are choosing specialization and there is a concern that not many Primary Care Doctors will be left to take care of the rural population. According to him, there are very few postgraduate seats in Family Medicine compared to the US, UK, Australia and other developed nations.

AAPI Global Medical Education has led this effort taking the delegation to the Indian National Board of Examinations in medical science NBEMS (nbe.edu.in) which conducts examination for the 1.8 million students and UG entrance examination across India and conduct the PG NNET entrance examination for 200,000 students annually.

Dr. Vasu Singh urged Indian Government and NITI to increase family medicine PG seats and nationalized formative assessment tests in theory part for all postgraduates and for post-graduate exit theory examination suggested computerized online test, nationwide E-Learning systems for higher transfer of Knowledge in medical education.

Dr. Kathula expressed hope that “The excellence gained through long term vision, insight and hard work and exchange of ideas and challenges will benefit the medical education system in India and help tens of thousands of medical graduates coming from India to have recognition in the US.”

AAPI is an umbrella organization which has nearly 160 local chapters, specialty societies and alumni organizations. For over 41 years, Indian physicians have made significant contributions to health care in this country, not only practicing in inner cities, rural areas and peripheral communities but also at the top medical schools and other academic centers. Almost 10%-12% of medical students entering US schools are of Indian origin. Headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois, AAPI represents the interests of over nearly 200,000 physicians, medical students and residents of Indian heritage in the United States.

For more information on AAPI and its many initiatives, please visit: www.aapiusa.org

A Call to Action: Prevent Hypertension — Engage in Salt Reduction

October 20, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation, Health 0

Supreme Court Orders IIT Dhanbad to Reinstate Dalit Student’s Admission After Missed Fee Deadline

October 4, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation, Youth 0

Atul Kumar, an 18-year-old from Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, was overjoyed when he passed a challenging entrance exam in June, allowing him to join one of India’s prestigious technology institutes. However, his excitement quickly turned into anxiety when he had to pay 17,500 rupees ($281; £156) online to confirm his admission. For Atul’s family, this was a significant sum, considering their modest income.

His father, Rajendra Kumar, who works as a daily wage laborer earning about 450 rupees ($5; £4) a day, managed to borrow the money just in time. Yet, despite their best efforts, Atul missed the fee deadline by mere seconds, partly due to technical glitches. This moment marked the beginning of a long struggle for the family, leading to petitions and court cases to secure Atul’s admission at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Dhanbad.

This week, the Supreme Court of India stepped in, invoking its special powers to order IIT Dhanbad to reinstate Atul’s admission. The court emphasized that “we cannot allow such a young talented boy to go away,” demonstrating its support for the young student.

Atul’s journey to this point has been marked by significant hurdles, as his family comes from the Dalit community, one of the most marginalized groups in India’s caste system. The IITs, which are highly sought-after institutions in India, receive applications from over a million candidates each year, with only about 18,000 seats available across 23 colleges nationwide. Many students, like Atul, spend years in coaching centers, preparing for the competitive entrance exams, with the hope that gaining admission to an IIT will pave the way for a successful future.

Atul’s story has captured national attention, not just because of his achievement but also because of his family’s financial struggles and the challenges they faced. His father, Rajendra Kumar, has consistently placed his children’s education above all else, going to great lengths to support them. He once sold his house to fund the education of his eldest son and told the BBC that he was willing to do whatever it took to ensure his children’s success.

Two of Atul’s brothers are currently studying engineering at well-known colleges, while another brother is pursuing a bachelor’s degree in Muzaffarnagar. Determined to follow in their footsteps, Atul devoted hours each day to his studies, often in a dimly lit corner of his house. The erratic electricity supply in the area further complicated his study routine, with frequent power cuts lasting for hours.

Despite these challenges, Rajendra Kumar could not afford to buy an inverter, which would have cost around 25,000 rupees. Reflecting on this, he stated, “But I would have sold the house [again] if needed.”

Atul had been attending a free coaching center for marginalized students in a nearby city, which helped him prepare for the IIT entrance exam. This year marked his second and final attempt, as students are only allowed two opportunities to take the exam. When he passed the test, it was a moment of triumph for the family, but they soon faced another obstacle – paying the admission fee.

With the fee deadline fast approaching, Rajendra Kumar turned to a local moneylender for help, but the lender backed out just two hours before the deadline. Left with little time, he reached out to friends, who pooled together 14,000 rupees. Rajendra Kumar then contributed 3,500 rupees from his savings to make up the full amount.

The money was quickly deposited into Atul’s bank account, and he logged in to complete the admission process. However, he had just 180 seconds left before the deadline expired. In a rush to complete the formalities, the family encountered another hurdle – the payment portal froze, and Atul missed the deadline.

The impact on the family was immediate and severe. No one ate for a full day as they processed the gravity of the situation. Atul’s coaching center contacted IIT Dhanbad on his behalf, but they received no assistance. Undeterred, the family sent emails to multiple college authorities and even took their case to another court, but these efforts yielded no results.

With their options dwindling, the family decided to approach the Supreme Court. Interestingly, this was not the first time the court had intervened in such a case. In 2021, it had allowed a Dalit student to join IIT Bombay after he missed the fee deadline due to similar financial and technical difficulties. Atul and his father reached out to that student, who connected them with the lawyer who had successfully fought his case.

When the case reached the Supreme Court, IIT Dhanbad argued that Atul had logged into the payment portal at 3 p.m., suggesting that he was not making a last-minute attempt. The institution also pointed out that Atul had received several reminders about the fee deadline via text messages. However, the court questioned why IIT Dhanbad was so determined to oppose Atul’s admission, especially given the extenuating circumstances.

The Supreme Court noted that there was no reason to believe that Atul wouldn’t have paid the fee if he had the means to do so. The justices ordered IIT Dhanbad to create an additional seat in the current batch to accommodate Atul. This decision ensured that his hard work and perseverance would not go in vain.

The Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, personally wished Atul well in his studies, saying, “All the best, do well!” The court’s intervention brought relief to Atul and his family, ending a long period of uncertainty and stress.

Atul’s story highlights the immense pressure and challenges faced by students from marginalized backgrounds in India, where access to higher education can be a ticket to economic and social mobility. His case serves as a reminder of the importance of ensuring that talented students are not denied opportunities due to financial or technical obstacles. The court’s decision to intervene in this matter underscores the judiciary’s role in safeguarding the rights of individuals, particularly those from disadvantaged communities.

Jaishankar Highlights Role of Indian Diaspora at PanIIT Alumni Foundation Launch in New York

October 3, 2024October 3, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Jaishankar, India’s External Affairs Minister, attended the launch of the PanIIT Alumni Foundation in New York on September 28, coinciding with the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly.

During this gathering, Jaishankar highlighted the crucial contributions and efforts of the Indian diaspora towards achieving a “Viksit Bharat” (Developed India). In a message he shared on the social media platform X, Jaishankar conveyed his satisfaction in being part of the event, stating:

“Pleased to participate in the launch of PanIIT Alumni Foundation in New York. A good chat with Dr. Purnendu Chatterjee on developing a technology and manufacturing ecosystem in India.”

He emphasized the indispensable role that the Indian diaspora plays in fostering a more robust and progressive India.

The PanIIT Alumni Foundation is dedicated to utilizing the extensive network of IIT alumni worldwide to aid India’s advancement across multiple sectors, particularly in technology and manufacturing.

The global Indian diaspora, known for its remarkable skills and contributions in various fields, has become an essential asset in India’s journey towards becoming a developed nation. With over 30 million Indians residing outside the country, their influence and engagement can significantly propel India’s growth in numerous sectors, including education, healthcare, technology, and manufacturing.

The PanIIT Alumni Foundation stands as a testament to the commitment of IIT graduates to give back to their homeland. By fostering connections among alumni and facilitating collaborations between the private sector and the Indian government, the foundation aims to drive innovation and create job opportunities. It encourages alumni to share their expertise and experiences, paving the way for a collaborative environment that fosters progress.

Jaishankar’s remarks at the launch resonate with a broader strategy the Indian government has been pursuing in recent years. The initiative to establish a developed India by 2047, the centenary of India’s independence, is a vision that requires not only domestic efforts but also active participation from the Indian diaspora. By harnessing their skills, networks, and resources, the government can enhance its initiatives and ensure sustainable development.

Furthermore, the technological landscape in India is rapidly evolving, with significant advancements in areas such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and renewable energy. The involvement of IIT alumni, who are often at the forefront of these innovations, can help bridge the gap between academic research and practical application. Their insights and contributions can help shape policies and programs that are not only beneficial to the Indian economy but also align with global trends.

The collaboration between the PanIIT Alumni Foundation and the Indian government can also focus on addressing some of the critical challenges India faces today. From climate change to healthcare accessibility, the expertise of the diaspora can offer innovative solutions that cater to local needs while considering global best practices. Jaishankar’s participation in this launch is a recognition of the potential that exists when Indian professionals unite towards a common goal.

As India embarks on this ambitious journey, the foundation’s efforts to mobilize the IIT alumni network are crucial. By creating platforms for dialogue and partnership, the PanIIT Alumni Foundation can facilitate the exchange of ideas, resources, and technologies. This collaboration can lead to impactful projects that not only benefit India but also inspire other nations facing similar challenges.

The alumni’s role goes beyond mere philanthropy; it involves strategic engagement with stakeholders, including government agencies, educational institutions, and private enterprises. This multifaceted approach will ensure that the knowledge and skills of the diaspora are effectively integrated into India’s developmental narrative.

In conclusion, the launch of the PanIIT Alumni Foundation marks a significant milestone in India’s quest for a developed future. With leaders like Jaishankar advocating for the cause, the synergy between the Indian government and its diaspora can lay a robust foundation for progress. As the world witnesses the emergence of a new India, the contributions of its global citizens will be paramount in shaping a prosperous and inclusive society.

The foundation’s focus on technology and manufacturing reflects a forward-thinking approach to addressing contemporary challenges. By nurturing a culture of innovation and collaboration, it can empower future generations of Indians to thrive in an increasingly competitive global landscape.

With collective efforts and a shared vision, the path to a “Viksit Bharat” is becoming clearer. The commitment shown by the diaspora and the government can turn this vision into reality, ensuring that India not only achieves its developmental goals but also emerges as a leader on the world stage. The journey towards a developed India is one that requires collaboration, innovation, and unwavering resolve.

The PanIIT Alumni Foundation, with its ambitious objectives, symbolizes the potential of India when its global community unites for a common purpose. Jaishankar’s insights and the foundation’s initiatives signal a bright future where the synergy of skills, knowledge, and experience will drive India towards sustainable growth and development.

Malabar Group Launches 2024 National Scholarship Programme to Empower Female Student

October 2, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

The Malabar Group, a prominent Indian business conglomerate and the parent company of Malabar Gold & Diamonds, has introduced its “National Scholarship Programme” for 2024. The announcement was made at an event held at the Bharat Diamond Bourse in Mumbai, India. Malabar Gold & Diamonds, recognized as the sixth-largest jewelry retailer worldwide, has committed to providing over $1.9 million through this initiative, which aims to support the education of more than 21,000 female students across India.

The scholarship program highlights the company’s dedication to fostering education for young women and promoting their empowerment. In a statement, the Malabar Group emphasized that the program aligns with its broader goal of uplifting women and contributing to their personal and professional growth.

The event was inaugurated by Piyush Goyal, India’s Honourable Minister of Commerce & Industry, and was attended by key figures within the company, including MP Ahammed, the Chairman of Malabar Group, Abdul Salam K P, the Vice-Chairman, Asher O, Managing Director of India operations for Malabar Gold & Diamonds, Nishad AK, Executive Director of the group, and Shaunak Parikh, Director of Mahendra Brothers.

MP Ahammed, Chairman of Malabar Group, highlighted the significance of the scholarship program, saying, “Education is the most powerful tool to change the world. Our scholarship programme is a direct reflection of Malabar Group’s deep-rooted belief that education unlocks opportunities and transforms lives. We are committed to removing barriers for young girls so they can fulfil their educational aspirations and contribute meaningfully to society.”

The Malabar Charitable Trust (MCT), which manages the company’s philanthropic activities, was established in 1999. Through this trust, Malabar Group allocates 5% of its profits from all regions of operation toward a range of charitable initiatives, including health, housing, education, hunger relief, women’s empowerment, and environmental causes. The trust places a strong focus on uplifting marginalized communities, aiming to create lasting impacts in these areas.

Since its inception in 2007, the Malabar National Scholarship Programme has invested over $7 million in supporting female students across India. This investment has provided financial assistance to more than 95,000 girls, enabling them to pursue their education without financial hindrances. The ongoing commitment to this cause demonstrates the Malabar Group’s long-term vision for empowering young women and creating opportunities that can transform their futures.

The company’s philanthropic efforts go beyond the scholarship program. Malabar Group also runs the Hunger-Free World Project, which provides nutritious meals to underprivileged people across India. This initiative is supported by a vast network of volunteers and partnerships with local non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The Hunger-Free World Project seeks to combat hunger and enhance food security by distributing 50,000 food packets daily in 80 cities across 16 states in India. The scope of the project extends beyond India, as Malabar Group also distributes 10,000 meals daily to school students in Zambia, Africa.

The company has ambitious goals for the Hunger-Free World Project, aiming to expand its operations to distribute 100,000 meals daily at 200 centers. This expansion plan underscores the Group’s unwavering commitment to alleviating hunger and ensuring that vulnerable communities have access to sufficient nutrition. The project’s impact is far-reaching, and with continued growth, Malabar Group hopes to make an even larger difference in the lives of those facing food insecurity.

Another significant initiative by the Malabar Group is the Grandma Home project, which provides shelter and care for destitute women. These fully-equipped homes offer women a safe and nurturing environment where they can live with dignity. Currently, the project operates homes in Bengaluru and Hyderabad, with plans to expand to several other major cities in India, including Kerala, Chennai, Kolkata, Delhi, and Mumbai. This initiative aims to address the needs of vulnerable women who lack the means to secure housing and protection, giving them a chance to lead lives of comfort and security.

In total, Malabar Group has invested more than $31 million in various social responsibility projects, further solidifying its reputation as a company that takes its corporate social responsibility (CSR) seriously. The Group’s investments in education, hunger relief, women’s empowerment, and housing have positively impacted countless lives, and the company remains committed to furthering its efforts in these areas.

Malabar Group’s ongoing contributions to society through its diverse initiatives reflect its deep-rooted belief in giving back to the community. The company’s dedication to CSR has grown alongside its business operations, ensuring that it remains an integral part of the communities in which it operates. The National Scholarship Programme, Hunger-Free World Project, and Grandma Home initiative are just a few examples of how the Malabar Group continues to lead by example in making meaningful, lasting contributions to society.

As Malabar Group continues to expand its philanthropic reach, its focus on education, particularly for young girls, stands out as a key priority. Through the National Scholarship Programme, the company is providing life-changing opportunities to thousands of female students who may not have had access to education otherwise. These scholarships are more than just financial aid; they represent a commitment to empowering the next generation of women leaders, professionals, and change-makers.

The company’s efforts to promote education, alleviate hunger, and provide shelter reflect its understanding of the interconnectedness of these issues. By addressing the educational needs of young women, ensuring that the underprivileged have access to nutritious food, and offering housing to vulnerable women, Malabar Group is creating a comprehensive support system that fosters both individual and community development.

Looking ahead, Malabar Group is poised to continue its legacy of impactful philanthropy. With its scholarship program growing each year and its hunger and housing projects expanding, the Group’s contributions to society will likely continue to touch thousands of lives in meaningful ways. By maintaining a focus on education, women’s empowerment, and social welfare, Malabar Group is setting an example for other corporations to follow.

The Malabar Group’s National Scholarship Programme for 2024, along with its other philanthropic initiatives, demonstrates the company’s ongoing commitment to social responsibility. As it supports the education of over 21,000 female students this year and continues to invest in hunger relief and housing projects, Malabar Group remains a beacon of hope and opportunity for countless individuals across India and beyond. With over $31 million already invested in social responsibility projects, the Group’s future contributions are expected to have an even greater impact, helping to shape a more equitable and prosperous world for all.

Boston University Launches Ravi K. Mehrotra Institute to Bridge Business, Markets, and Society

September 22, 2024September 22, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Boston University’s Questrom School of Business officially inaugurated the Ravi K. Mehrotra Institute for Business, Markets, and Society on September 19.

The institute was founded thanks to a donation from UK-based business magnate Ravi K. Mehrotra, the founder of Foresight Group in London and a former marine engineer. Under the leadership of Director Marcel Rindisbacher, the institute will prioritize both research and public engagement.

The launch event included a conversation between Mehrotra and Questrom Dean Susan Fournier, as well as a panel discussion featuring industry leaders such as Anthony Allott, chairperson of Silgan Holdings, and Om Prakash Bhatt, former chairman of the State Bank of India. Lawrence H. Summers, former U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, delivered the keynote address during the dinner.

“An institute focused on the intersections of business, markets, and society is essential in bridging the gaps in understanding and fostering collaboration across these key areas. This will lead to a more informed, ethical, and sustainable approach to commerce and economics,” Mehrotra stated.

Fournier highlighted the Institute’s mission of enhancing public understanding of business. “There is much to be done in business academia, and the Mehrotra Institute is uniquely positioned to harness the potential of business and markets to drive positive global change,” she said.

The Institute will focus on developing educational programs, encouraging dialogue on capitalism, and conducting evidence-based research that seeks to balance the prosperity of businesses with societal goals. It will also host events and discussions aimed at improving public awareness of the responsibilities businesses hold in today’s global economy.

The Decline of Full-Length Novel Reading in U.S. Classrooms and Its Impact on Students’ Critical Thinking

September 19, 2024 Staff ReporterEducation 0

Chris Stanislawski, a middle school student, noticed that his English classes didn’t involve much actual reading. In his experience at Garden City Middle School in Long Island, detailed chapter summaries and audio versions were provided for every novel they discussed, and much of the reading material was either abridged or consisted of online texts and printouts. This approach to literature left Chris feeling uninterested in the stories. “When you’re given a summary of the book telling you what you’re about to read in baby form, it kind of just ruins the whole story for you,” he said, questioning the purpose of reading the entire book.

Chris’s experience isn’t unique. In many classrooms across America, assigning full-length novels has become less common. Instead, teachers are opting for selected passages in response to several challenges, including perceived shorter attention spans, pressure to prepare students for standardized tests, and the belief that shorter content may better prepare students for a digital world.

A 2022 statement by the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) recognized this shift, suggesting that book reading and essay writing are no longer the central focus of English language arts education. “The time has come to decenter book reading and essay-writing as the pinnacles of English language arts education,” the NCTE said.

Seth French, who co-authored the statement, clarified that the goal is not to eliminate books but to integrate media literacy and more relevant texts for students. In the English class he taught before becoming a dean at Bentonville High School in Arkansas, French engaged students with plays, poetry, and articles, while only assigning one book to be read by the entire class. He explained, “At the end of the day, a lot of our students are not interested in some of these texts that they didn’t have a choice in.”

Not everyone agrees with the trend toward shorter, digital texts. Maryanne Wolf, a cognitive neuroscientist at UCLA specializing in dyslexia research, argues that deep reading is critical for developing brain circuits related to critical thinking, empathy, and background knowledge. Wolf emphasized the importance of immersive reading, saying, “We must give our young an opportunity to understand who others are, not through little snapshots, but through immersion into the lives and thoughts and feelings of others.”

Garden City Middle School requires students to read several full books each year, including classics like Of Mice and Men and Romeo and Juliet, according to Principal Matthew Samuelson. Summaries and audio versions are provided as additional resources. However, for Chris, who has dyslexia, these tools didn’t make reading more accessible. Instead, he felt bored and decided to switch to a Catholic school, which his mother believes will better prepare him for college.

Outside of the classroom, students’ engagement with reading has been declining. According to federal data from last year, only 14% of young teens read for fun daily, a sharp decrease from 27% in 2012. Many educators link this decline to the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. English teacher Kristy Acevedo from New Bedford, Massachusetts, noted a trend during the pandemic to stop assigning full-length novels as students were coping with trauma. “The problem is we haven’t quite come back from that,” she said. Determined to change this, Acevedo plans to focus on time-management strategies and use traditional materials like paper and pencils for most classwork.

Standardized testing and the rise of education technology have also contributed to the reduction in book reading. Digital platforms offer thousands of short passages aligned with state standards, allowing schools to cover the required curriculum without assigning full-length novels. Karl Ubelhoer, a special education teacher in Tabernacle, New Jersey, observed that school districts focused on improving test scores often mimic the test format as closely as possible. “If admins and school districts are judged by their test scores, how are they going to improve their test scores? They’re going to mirror the test as much as possible,” he explained.

For some students, reading is a struggle regardless of the format. In 2022, only about one-third of fourth and eighth graders reached proficiency on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, marking a significant drop from 2019. Leah van Belle, executive director of the Detroit literacy coalition 313Reads, recounted that when her son’s class read *Peter Pan* in elementary school, the text was too difficult for most students. She lamented that Detroit has become “a book desert,” with her son’s school lacking a library altogether. Still, she sees value in focusing on shorter texts, noting that adults often rely on digital media for personal and professional research.

Even in schools with ample resources, time constraints remain a major hurdle. Terri White, an English teacher at South Windsor High School in Connecticut, said she no longer assigns her ninth-grade honors students the entire text of To Kill a Mockingbird. Instead, she assigns a third of the book along with a synopsis of the rest. She feels pressured to move quickly due to the need to cover more material in the curriculum. “It’s like spinning plates, you know what I mean? Like it’s a circus,” White said, describing the balancing act teachers face.

White has also reduced the amount of homework she assigns, recognizing that students are overwhelmed with extracurricular activities like sports and clubs. “I maintain rigor. But I’m more about helping students become stronger and more critical readers, writers, and thinkers, while taking their social-emotional well-being into account,” she said.

However, some educators worry that this reliance on summaries may harm students’ critical thinking abilities in the long run. Alden Jones, a literature professor at Emerson College in Boston, noted that while she assigns fewer books than before, she now gives more quizzes to ensure students keep up with their reading. “We don’t value the thinking time that we used to have. It’s all time we could be on our phone accomplishing tasks,” Jones remarked.

Despite the challenges, some teachers continue to find ways to engage students with literature. Will Higgins, an English teacher at Dartmouth High School in Massachusetts, remains committed to teaching the classics, though he acknowledges that student time constraints have led to cutting back on certain texts. “We haven’t given up on Jane Eyre and Pride and Prejudice. We haven’t given up on Hamlet or The Great Gatsby,” Higgins said, though books like A Tale of Two Cities have been dropped from the curriculum.

One successful approach at his school has been student-directed book clubs, where students select their own books and discuss them in small groups. Contemporary authors like John Green and Jason Reynolds have been particularly popular. “It’s funny,” Higgins noted, “Many students are saying that it’s the first time in a long time they’ve read a full book.”

America’s education trade surplus has skyrocketed since 1999

Key Points of the Order:

Legal and Political Challenges:

Trump’s Justification:

Links to Palestinian Heritage Under Scrutiny

Crackdown on Pro-Palestinian Supporters

University Affiliation and Research

Other Cases of Deportation and Detention

TheUNN Corporation

CONTACT US

Follow us

Subscribe to Newsletter