ChatGPT Image Aids Arrest in Pacific Palisades Fire Investigation

A 29-year-old man has been arrested in connection with the Pacific Palisades fire, which resulted in 12 fatalities and the destruction of over 6,000 homes in January.

A 29-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of starting the devastating Pacific Palisades fire in Los Angeles, which claimed 12 lives and destroyed more than 6,000 homes in January. The suspect, Jonathan Rinderknecht, was apprehended in Florida, with evidence from his digital devices linking him to the fire, including an image he generated using ChatGPT that depicted a burning city, according to officials from the Justice Department.

The Pacific Palisades fire ravaged over 23,000 acres and caused approximately $150 billion in damages. The blaze, which lasted for more than three weeks, obliterated entire neighborhoods and severely impacted areas of Topanga and Malibu.

Rinderknecht has been charged with destruction of property, and Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli expressed hope that the arrest would provide some measure of justice to those affected by the disaster. Additional charges, including murder, may be forthcoming as the investigation continues.

After the fire, Rinderknecht relocated to Florida, having previously lived and worked in California. He is scheduled to appear in the U.S. District Court in Orlando for a bond hearing on Thursday. However, he is not expected to enter an official plea until his arraignment hearing in Los Angeles, which is set to take place in the coming weeks.

According to the indictment, Rinderknecht ignited a fire known as the Lachman Fire on New Year’s Day. He allegedly used an open flame to start the fire after completing a ride as an Uber driver on New Year’s Eve. Although firefighters quickly suppressed the initial flames, the fire smoldered underground in the dense vegetation before reigniting during a windstorm.

Authorities have uncovered links between Rinderknecht and the fire through his phone records, which include videos he recorded of firefighters attempting to extinguish the flames. His phone activity revealed that he made multiple attempts to call 911 just after midnight on New Year’s Day, but was unable to connect due to poor mobile reception in the area. Investigators found a screen recording of him trying to reach emergency services, during which he was eventually connected to a dispatcher.

In a concerning inquiry, Rinderknecht asked ChatGPT whether a person could be held responsible if a fire was caused by their cigarettes. Investigators believe this question was an attempt to fabricate evidence suggesting a more innocent cause for the fire.

Furthermore, five months prior to the fire, Rinderknecht had requested ChatGPT to create an image of a “dystopian painting” featuring a burning forest and a crowd fleeing from the flames, raising further suspicions about his intentions.

California Governor Gavin Newsom commented on the arrest, calling it a significant step toward providing closure for the thousands of Californians whose lives were disrupted by the fire. He also noted that the state is cooperating with the federal investigation into the incident.

Source: Original article

Tirlok Malik Celebrates Indian-American Culture at New York Diwali Festivals

Emmy-nominated filmmaker Tirlok Malik will portray Bharat at two major Diwali celebrations in New York, showcasing the timeless values of the Ramayana.

Emmy-nominated filmmaker, actor, and Happy Life Yoga speaker Tirlok Malik is set to captivate audiences this Diwali season by once again embodying Bharat in two of New York’s premier celebrations: the AIA Diwali Festival at Overlook Beach, Long Island, and the Times Square Diwali Festival.

Malik has a long-standing tradition of portraying Bharat under the mentorship of Pandit S.N. Charkha, the founder of the East-West School of Dance and a disciple of the esteemed Padma Vibhushan Pandit Birju Maharaj. His impressive track record includes seven consecutive years performing at the Museum of Metropolitan Art’s annual Diwali events in New York, where he has consistently drawn full houses. “Pandit Charkha ji has devoted his life to dance and the arts. Being under his guidance is a true blessing,” Malik reflects. “When I play Bharat, especially during Lord Rama’s coronation, I feel fully immersed, almost in a trance.”

For Malik, the character of Bharat—the devoted brother of Lord Rama from the epic Ramayana—represents ideals of love, respect, devotion, and sacrifice. “Portraying Bharat is more than acting; it is stepping into timeless values that resonate today,” he explains, emphasizing the depth of his connection to the role.

The AIA Diwali Festival, now in its 38th year, is the oldest and most renowned celebration of its kind in the United States. This year, the festival is led by President Bina Kothari and National President Gobind Munjal. The event at Overlook Beach will feature fireworks, music, and a grand dance drama directed by Pandit Charkha, with Malik taking center stage as Bharat.

The festivities continue with the Times Square Diwali Festival, which is celebrating its 10th anniversary. Created and led by Neeta Bhasin, this festival has successfully brought the spirit of Diwali to a global audience in the heart of New York City. Malik acknowledges Bhasin’s remarkable achievement, stating, “Neeta Bhasin ji has accomplished something extraordinary, making Diwali a part of the world’s most iconic square. Performing the Ramayana in Times Square is historic and sends a powerful message about the universal relevance of our traditions.”

For Malik, these performances transcend mere entertainment; they serve as a medium for sharing the enduring lessons of the Ramayana with American audiences. “In today’s world, the values depicted in the Ramayana are needed more than ever. By bringing these stories to New York, we celebrate Diwali while reminding ourselves and future generations of values that uphold humanity,” he asserts.

Source: Original article

Three U.S. Scientists with UC Ties Awarded 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics

Three U.S. scientists affiliated with the University of California have been awarded the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics for their groundbreaking work in quantum physics on a chip.

SAN FRANCISCO, CA — Three U.S. scientists with strong connections to the University of California have been awarded the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics. Their groundbreaking experiments demonstrated the principles of quantum physics on a chip, a significant advancement that could pave the way for the next generation of quantum technologies, including computers, sensors, and cryptography. The laureates will share a prize of 11 million Swedish kronor.

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences recognized their contributions “for the discovery of macroscopic quantum mechanical tunneling and energy quantization in an electric circuit.” Their innovative work revealed that quantum effects, which are usually only observable at microscopic scales, can manifest in systems large enough to be held in the hand.

Olle Eriksson, Chair of the Nobel Committee for Physics, expressed enthusiasm for the recognition, stating, “It is wonderful to celebrate the way century-old quantum mechanics continually offers new surprises. It is also enormously useful, as quantum mechanics is the foundation of all digital technology.”

UC President James Milliken praised the achievement as a significant milestone for the university system. He noted that the laureates—John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret, and John M. Martinis—join a “long line” of UC faculty Nobel laureates, which includes 23 previous winners in the field of physics. “These awards are not only great honors,” he remarked, “they are tangible evidence of the work happening across the University of California every day to expand knowledge, test the boundaries of science, and conduct research that improves our lives.”

The connections of the laureates to the University of California are noteworthy. John Clarke, 83, earned his Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge and is an emeritus professor at UC Berkeley. Michel H. Devoret, 72, received his doctorate from Paris-Sud University and currently teaches at both Yale University and UC Santa Barbara. John M. Martinis, 67, completed his Ph.D. at UC Berkeley and is also an emeritus professor at UC Santa Barbara.

This recognition not only highlights the individual achievements of the scientists but also underscores the University of California’s ongoing contributions to the field of physics and its commitment to advancing scientific research.

Source: Original article

US Soldiers in Urban Areas Increase Safety Concerns, Says Candidate

New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill criticized President Trump’s National Guard deployments, asserting that military presence in cities makes people feel less safe.

New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Rep. Mikie Sherrill has voiced strong opposition to President Donald Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to American cities, claiming that the presence of troops on the streets “makes people less safe.” During a gubernatorial debate on Wednesday night against Republican candidate Jack Ciattarelli, Sherrill emphasized her belief that “military members should not be on our streets.”

Sherrill articulated her concerns, stating, “It makes people less safe, it makes people feel less safe.” When asked how she would respond if Trump were to send the National Guard to a city in New Jersey, she clarified her stance. “Unless there is an insurrection or some sort of crisis where the National Guard could come in and the president invokes the Insurrection Act, he’s moving these National Guard troops across the country illegally against the Insurrection Act, against posse comitatus,” she said.

In her remarks, Sherrill reiterated her position that military personnel should not be deployed in civilian areas. “I can tell you this, because I’ve both worked at the U.S. Attorney’s office with law enforcement to keep people safe, and I’ve also worked in the military, and those are two very different jobs,” she explained. She expressed her disapproval of Trump’s comments regarding using U.S. cities as training grounds for the military, calling such a notion “unacceptable.” Sherrill stated, “I will not stand for that as governor.”

On the other side of the debate, Ciattarelli challenged Sherrill’s record on public safety. He accused her of being weak on safety issues, stating, “The congresswoman has been anything but strong when it comes to public safety.” He pointed out her vote to eliminate qualified immunity, which he described as a fundamental protection for local law enforcement. Ciattarelli also criticized her consideration of reappointing the current attorney general, whom he labeled as the most anti-police attorney general New Jersey has ever had.

Ciattarelli assured the audience that, as governor, he would prioritize safety, declaring, “I’ve told the president, and the people of New Jersey, that he will never have to worry about New Jersey because as governor, we’ll have safe communities.” He emphasized his commitment to restoring law and order in the state, stating, “We will be a law-and-order state again, and there will be a consequence for unruly, unlawful behavior.”

As the gubernatorial race heats up, the contrasting views on public safety and military presence in urban areas are likely to remain central themes in the campaign.

Source: Original article

Scientists Anticipate Underwater Volcano Eruption Off Oregon Coast

An underwater volcano, Axial Seamount, located 300 miles off the Oregon coast, is showing signs of a potential eruption, though experts assure it poses no threat to land or seismic activity.

Scientists have indicated that the Axial Seamount, an underwater volcano situated 300 miles off the coast of Oregon, may erupt later this year. This volcano, which lies over 4,900 feet beneath the surface of the Pacific Ocean, has not erupted since 2015, but recent observations suggest that it could be on the verge of an eruption.

The Axial Seamount is formed by a geological phenomenon known as a hot spot. This occurs when hot plumes of molten material rise from the Earth’s mantle into the crust. According to the University of Washington’s College of the Environment, as the tectonic plates move over the stationary hot spot, long chains of volcanoes are created over time.

“Over two-thirds of the Earth’s surface was formed by volcanic eruptions at these mid-ocean ridges,” said Maya Tolstoy, a marine geophysicist and dean of the university’s College of the Environment. “Axial Seamount is a direct result of these fundamental processes that continue to shape our planet today.”

Despite the potential for an eruption, scientists have reassured the public that there is no immediate danger. “Axial Seamount is much too deep and far from shore for people on land to even notice when it erupts,” the university’s blog post stated. “An eruption at Axial Seamount also has nothing to do with seismic activity on land, so Pacific Northwesterners don’t need to worry about this event triggering a major earthquake or tsunami.”

The first indication of an impending eruption will likely be a significant increase in seismic activity around the volcano. Deborah Kelley, a professor at the University of Washington’s School of Oceanography and director of the Regional Cabled Array, noted that the volcano has already surpassed the inflation levels observed in 2015. Currently, the earthquake activity remains relatively low, with reports of 200 to 300 earthquakes occurring daily, and occasional spikes reaching around 1,000 due to tidal influences.

“If what we learned in 2015 is correct, I would expect to see more than 2,000 earthquakes per day for a few months before the eruption,” Kelley explained. The increased seismic activity is attributed to magma moving closer to the surface.

William Wilcock, also a professor at the UW School of Oceanography, elaborated on the eruption process. “That period lasts about an hour, and then the magma reaches the surface,” he said. “Lava flows spread across the caldera, and lava-filled fissures open up to the north or the south, reaching as far as 40 kilometers (about 25 miles).” He added that while the seismic activity tends to decrease shortly after the eruption begins, the eruption itself may continue at a slow pace for approximately a month.

In summary, while the Axial Seamount shows signs of a potential eruption, experts maintain that it poses no threat to coastal communities or seismic stability in the region. The ongoing monitoring of the volcano will provide further insights into its activity and any necessary precautions.

Source: Original article

She Aided North Korea in Infiltrating U.S. Tech Firms

Christina Chapman operated a covert hub from her Arizona home, facilitating North Korean operatives’ infiltration of U.S. companies, resulting in over $17 million in stolen salaries.

In a quiet neighborhood of Litchfield Park, Arizona, Christina Chapman, 50, ran a covert operation that enabled North Korean operatives to infiltrate American firms, amassing a staggering $17 million in stolen salaries.

This scenario is not a plot from a new Netflix series; it is a real-life case that unfolded just a short drive from Phoenix. Chapman appeared to be an ordinary suburban woman, but her home served as a secret cyber operations center aimed at assisting North Korean IT workers in acquiring equipment and tools for their military.

Due to international sanctions, North Korean workers cannot legally apply for jobs at major American companies like Google, Amazon, or Meta. Instead, they resort to stealing the identities of real Americans, including names, birth dates, and Social Security numbers. Using this stolen information, they impersonate remote IT workers, slipping into U.S. companies unnoticed.

However, when these companies send out laptops and phones to their new “remote hires,” the devices cannot be shipped to North Korea. Over three years, Chapman transformed her suburban residence into a covert hub for North Korea’s elite cybercriminals, receiving more than 100 laptops and smartphones from various U.S. companies.

These were not just any companies; they included major American banks, top-tier tech firms, and at least one U.S. government contractor, all of which believed they were hiring legitimate remote workers. Unbeknownst to them, they were onboarding North Korean operatives.

Upon receiving the equipment, Chapman connected the devices to virtual private networks (VPNs) and remote desktop tools like AnyDesk and Chrome Remote Desktop. She even employed voice-changing software to create the illusion that the North Koreans were logging in from within the United States.

Chapman also shipped 49 laptops and other devices supplied by U.S. companies to overseas locations, including multiple shipments to a city in China bordering North Korea. These fake employees participated in daily activities, submitting code, answering emails, and attending meetings, all while actually operating from halfway around the world. In reality, they were siphoning U.S. technology and cash directly into Kim Jong Un’s regime.

When human resources teams requested video verification, Chapman did not hesitate. She appeared on camera herself, sometimes in costume, impersonating the individuals listed on the resumes. She managed the entire operation like a talent agency for cybercriminals, staging fake job interviews, coaching operatives on their responses, and laundering their salaries through U.S. banks.

Chapman reportedly took home at least $800,000 in “service fees,” while the total amount stolen for North Korea exceeded $17 million, according to the FBI, which labeled the scheme a national security threat. Chapman referred to her actions as “helping her friends.”

Eventually, the elaborate scheme began to unravel. Investigators detected unusual patterns, such as numerous remote hires all linked to the same Arizona address and company systems being accessed from countries the workers had never visited.

Chapman was arrested and sentenced in July 2025 to 102 months in federal prison. The most astonishing aspect of this case? She orchestrated the entire operation from her living room, exemplifying a new era of remote work.

Source: Original article

H-1B Fees Impact Universities: 25 Schools Face Financial Risks

The implementation of a $100,000 fee for new H-1B visas could significantly impact universities, prompting advisories and concerns about the future of international faculty recruitment.

The recent announcement of a $100,000 fee for new H-1B visas is poised to create challenges for universities across the United States. While the fee is not scheduled to take effect until March 2026, coinciding with the annual lottery for approximately 85,000 new H-1B visas, its implications are already being felt in academic institutions.

Jeremy Neufeld, director of immigration policy at the nonpartisan Institute for Progress, emphasizes that universities may be among the first to experience the fallout from this policy. Unlike private companies, universities and certain nonprofit organizations are currently exempt from the lottery system, allowing them to apply for H-1B visas year-round. However, they are not exempt from the new fee, which represents a significant financial burden. “The universities are on the frontlines and this is just a pure tax on their pipeline,” Neufeld stated.

Previously, H-1B fees ranged from $2,000 to $5,000, depending on the size of the employer, according to the American Immigration Council. The steep increase to $100,000 raises concerns about the ability of universities to attract and retain international talent, particularly as the Trump administration’s recent measures also propose changes to the visa lottery system that would favor older, higher-paid workers. This shift could hinder the prospects of international students earning advanced degrees in the U.S., who traditionally have relied on H-1B visas to remain in the country after graduation.

In response to the uncertainty surrounding the new visa rules, the University of Southern California (USC) has issued a travel advisory for faculty and staff on H-1B visas. The advisory recommends postponing international travel until further guidance is provided. The university’s student newspaper reported that faculty currently abroad are encouraged to return to the United States before the new regulations take effect.

“Out of an abundance of caution, all faculty and staff in H-1B status currently in the U.S. should put international travel plans on hold until they receive further guidance,” the advisory stated. “If possible, any faculty and staff in H-1B status who are currently outside the U.S. are strongly recommended to return to the U.S. before the proclamation takes effect.”

Aisling Kelliher, an associate professor in cinematic arts at USC, highlighted the importance of the American education system’s international reputation. “It’s a huge opportunity, both to come here as an immigrant and to receive an education, and then also to be able to continue as a researcher and as a teacher within the system that you’ve learned from,” she remarked.

The impact of the Trump administration’s policies on foreign student enrollment is already evident. Data from the U.S. International Trade Administration indicates that international student arrivals (excluding those from Canada and Mexico) decreased by 19% in August 2025 compared to the previous year, totaling 307,419. Similarly, July arrivals fell by 28% to 76,519. Forbes immigration senior contributor Stuart Anderson noted that some of this decline may be attributed to already enrolled students opting not to return home for the summer, as many universities advised them to remain in the U.S. to avoid potential reentry issues.

According to data from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the 25 universities that received the most H-1B visas in the first nine months of Fiscal Year 2025 included Stanford University, which granted 500 visas during this period. Notably, 36% of its graduate students are international. Washington University in St. Louis and Columbia University in New York City reported that nearly half of their graduate students (46%) are from abroad.

In light of the new fee, a lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California challenging the $100,000 charge. The plaintiffs include the American Association of University Professors, unions representing graduate students and medical residents, a church and its pastor, the recruiting firm Global Nurse Force, and an Indian postdoctoral researcher who lost her H-1B sponsorship due to the fee.

The lawsuit argues that the fee disproportionately affects workers already in the U.S. on other visas, such as F-1 student visas, who are seeking to transition to H-1B status. Even if the courts ultimately block the fee or grant exemptions for universities and nonprofits, the broader implications of the H-1B measures could still deter international faculty recruitment.

Additionally, proposed changes to student visas may restrict some graduate students from pursuing postdoctoral positions in the U.S. through Optional Practical Training (OPT). This program allows STEM graduates from abroad to work for up to three years, helping them build professional networks and transition into H-1B roles sponsored by universities or private employers.

The evolving landscape of immigration policy continues to raise concerns among academic institutions, as they navigate the challenges posed by new fees and regulations that could significantly alter the recruitment of international talent.

Source: Original article

Rare Neck Condition Raises Stroke Risk During Salon Hair Washing

Salon hair washing can pose a rare risk of stroke due to a condition known as beauty parlor stroke syndrome, which can occur from improper neck positioning during the process.

For many, a trip to the salon for a shampoo is a moment of indulgence and relaxation. However, for a small number of individuals, this seemingly harmless act can trigger a serious condition known as beauty parlor stroke syndrome (BPSS).

BPSS is characterized by stroke-like events that can occur when the neck is hyperextended or rotated during hair washing or similar activities. This positioning can lead to compression or even tearing of the vertebral arteries located in the neck.

The term “beauty parlor stroke syndrome” was first popularized in 1993 by New York neurologist Michael Weintraub, who documented five cases of patients experiencing symptoms after salon shampoo treatments. A recent review published in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine has identified 54 documented cases of BPSS over nearly five decades, compiled from 22 different studies. Among these cases, 42 originated in beauty salons, while eight occurred in dental settings, and four were reported in other contexts.

Notably, approximately 80% of those affected by BPSS are women, with ages ranging from teenagers to seniors. A 2018 review published in the Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine explains that BPSS occurs when the neck is held in an extreme backward or twisted position during a wash or treatment. This can stretch or compress the vertebral arteries that run along the spine to the brain.

In rare instances, such positioning can cause a tear in the artery wall, known as a dissection. This dissection may lead to the formation of a clot, which can obstruct blood flow to the brain. The same review also highlights that even minor structural issues, such as bone spurs (osteophytes) in the cervical vertebrae, can exacerbate compression and increase the risk of BPSS. Consequently, a simple tilt of the head can temporarily restrict blood supply to critical areas of the brain stem and cerebellum.

Symptoms of BPSS typically manifest during or within several days following the triggering posture. Common warning signs include dizziness, vertigo, neck pain, and visual disturbances. In more severe cases, individuals may experience weakness, numbness, or difficulties with speech.

Diagnosis of BPSS usually involves MRI or CT angiography to confirm the presence of arterial dissection. Treatment often mirrors that of other types of strokes, with doctors prescribing antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications. In some cases, vascular stenting or surgery may be necessary, according to medical experts.

Health researchers associated with the American Council on Science and Health in New York City emphasize that BPSS is exceedingly rare and primarily recognized through isolated case reports rather than extensive population data.

Despite its rarity, the Pro Beauty Association in Arizona recommends that stylists take precautions by providing neck support, such as rolled towels or cushions, and allowing clients to maintain a more upright position during washes. Experts also advise clients to communicate immediately if they experience any neck strain or dizziness during the process.

As awareness of beauty parlor stroke syndrome grows, both salon professionals and clients are encouraged to prioritize safety to ensure that hair washing remains a relaxing experience.

Source: Original article

Axel, DACA Recipient, Works to Safeguard His Community

Axel Herrera, a DACA recipient in North Carolina, faces uncertainty as local police checkpoints increase, impacting his community and prompting him to pursue further education at Yale.

Since the election of President Trump, Axel Herrera has witnessed a troubling rise in local police traffic checkpoints throughout his North Carolina community. As a DACA recipient, Axel enjoys legal protection from deportation, yet he has seen friends and family members detained or deported following random traffic stops. This has left many undocumented individuals in his community living in a state of constant fear. “It’s creating a hostile environment,” Axel states. “It’s pretty clear what the government is trying to do.”

At 27 years old, Axel has lived in North Carolina since he was seven, when his family fled Honduras in search of a better life. Achieving DACA status felt like the realization of his family’s dreams. He earned a scholarship to Duke University, becoming the first in his family to attend college, and graduated with multiple awards, including a prestigious Congressional internship.

Following his graduation, Axel took on the role of civic engagement director for Mi Familia en Acción, a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting Hispanic communities. Over the past few years, he has focused on registering citizens to vote, creating youth programs, and mentoring immigrants as they pursue educational and professional opportunities. “All I ever wanted was to belong, and to give something back,” he reflects.

However, the current political climate has posed significant challenges. Ongoing legal battles surrounding DACA’s validity threaten Axel’s protection from deportation. He must renew his DACA status and employment authorization every two years. Although he was able to process his paperwork just before Trump took office, he remains uncertain about the future of his status when it expires in 2026. He is aware that some Dreamers are struggling to get their applications processed, and the Trump administration has already deported at least one DACA recipient under the claim of an outstanding deportation order. “Right now, everything is up in the air,” Axel admits. “I’m very concerned about the future.”

One potential outcome is that courts may uphold DACA but revoke the work authorization for its recipients. Due to this uncertainty, Axel has decided to leave his hard-earned job and return to school. This fall, he will relocate to Yale, where he has secured a scholarship to study business and public policy. “It’s a great opportunity, but also a hedge against losing my status,” he explains. “If I lose my work authorization, then being a student might buy me some time and let me find a different path forward.”

Despite his current protections, Axel feels conflicted about leaving his community. Many of his friends and neighbors are constantly communicating via WhatsApp, assessing police conditions whenever they leave their homes. He knows numerous young Venezuelans whose humanitarian parole has recently been revoked, rendering them unable to work or study. In the past six months, he has witnessed families torn apart by raids and deportations, or those too fearful of ICE to attend school. “I speak all the time with young people whose whole future is on the chopping block,” Axel shares.

Yet, despite his protections, Axel senses a looming threat that conditions could deteriorate rapidly. Under Trump, anti-immigrant sentiment and policies have become more entrenched. He is particularly concerned about the long-term implications of a new state law mandating that sheriffs cooperate with ICE. Axel fears for his and his family’s future, stating, “After 20 years, we’re barely scratching the surface of dealing with our status issues. It never ends—and the Trump administration is rolling back so much of the progress we’ve made.”

Source: Original article

Supreme Court Questions Legality of Conversion Therapy Ban for Minors

The Supreme Court is poised to evaluate Colorado’s ban on conversion therapy for minors, weighing the implications for free speech, faith, and LGBTQ+ protections.

The Supreme Court of the United States is currently reviewing Colorado’s controversial ban on conversion therapy, a practice aimed at changing an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity. The case has significant implications for First Amendment rights and the ongoing debate surrounding LGBTQ+ protections.

During oral arguments on Tuesday, the court’s conservative majority appeared inclined to support the claims of licensed counselor Kaley Chiles, who argues that the Colorado legislation infringes upon her free speech rights and the religious freedoms of both herself and her clients. Chiles contends that the law effectively censors private conversations between counselors and their clients, restricting the type of therapy she can provide.

Colorado’s law is part of a broader trend, with approximately two dozen states and Washington, D.C., enacting similar bans. The state government maintains that the legislation is necessary to regulate professional conduct, citing overwhelming evidence that conversion therapy is both unsafe and ineffective.

During the 90-minute oral arguments, several justices expressed skepticism about the law’s implications. Justice Samuel Alito highlighted a potential double standard, questioning whether the state could legitimately favor one viewpoint over another in the realm of medical advice. Justice Amy Coney Barrett echoed this sentiment, asking if the state could choose sides in a debate among medical experts regarding the safety of gender-affirming care.

Conversely, some justices sided with Colorado’s position, emphasizing the consensus among mental health professionals that verbal-based conversion therapy can be harmful. Justice Sonia Sotomayor pointed out that numerous studies indicate such practices can lead to emotional and physical distress.

The key justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, may ultimately determine the outcome of the case. Roberts referenced prior court rulings that did not differentiate between professional speech and other forms of expression, suggesting that the law could be seen as infringing upon protected speech.

Chiles’ legal team describes her as a practicing Christian who believes individuals thrive when they align their lives with what she describes as God’s design, which includes accepting their biological sex. She employs “faith-informed” counseling techniques to assist young clients who wish to navigate their sexual attractions and behaviors. However, her attorneys clarify that she does not aim to “cure” clients of same-sex attractions or change their sexual orientation.

Outside the courthouse, a small group of demonstrators gathered to support the Colorado law, while Chiles’ supporters canceled their planned rally due to safety concerns. Inside, the courtroom saw a stark contrast in perspectives regarding the efficacy of conversion therapy. Colorado’s representatives argued that a substantial body of evidence supports the law’s effectiveness in preventing harm, while Chiles’ team contended that existing studies are flawed and do not demonstrate harm from conversion therapy.

Chiles’ attorney, James Campbell, argued that states should not interfere in the private conversations between licensed professionals and their clients. The majority of justices seemed to resonate with this viewpoint. Justice Elena Kagan posed a hypothetical scenario in which two doctors treat a patient with differing approaches—one advocating for change and the other for acceptance. She questioned whether it was fair for one approach to be permissible while the other was not, suggesting a potential case of viewpoint discrimination.

As the arguments unfolded, Colorado Solicitor General Shannon Stevenson emphasized that the core issue at stake was not merely about free speech but about maintaining best practices in mental health care. Alito interjected, recalling instances in history where medical consensus has been influenced by political ideologies, questioning the reliability of such consensus.

The Trump administration’s Justice Department has also weighed in, arguing that the law creates a “muzzling” effect, preventing counselors from assisting clients in accepting their assigned sex at birth while allowing other therapists to support those exploring their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raised concerns about whether talk therapy should be treated differently from medical care, expressing confusion over why a therapist’s verbal guidance would not be afforded the same protections as a medical professional’s treatment.

Stevenson reiterated that the harm associated with conversion therapy arises when individuals are told they can change an inherent aspect of themselves, leading to feelings of shame and distress when they fail to do so. The American Psychiatric Association has not classified homosexuality as a mental illness for over five decades, further complicating the debate.

Chiles attended the oral arguments and later expressed her belief that her work is an extension of her faith. She advocates for access to voluntary counseling for struggling youth, arguing that they deserve better than a one-size-fits-all approach from the state.

The Supreme Court has faced a series of LGBTQ+-related cases in recent years, including a ruling that upheld a Tennessee law banning certain medical treatments for transgender teens. The court is also set to consider state laws regarding transgender athletes’ participation in girls’ and women’s sports teams.

The Colorado case has become a focal point for political and social discourse, with 187 House and Senate Democrats, along with major medical and mental health organizations, supporting the law. Conversely, groups backing Chiles include the Trump Justice Department and various conservative organizations.

In a 2015 report, the Obama administration’s Health and Human Services Department concluded that conversion therapy for minors should be prohibited. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) stated that there is no evidence supporting the effectiveness of such interventions in altering gender identity or sexual orientation.

The current case, Chiles v. Salazar (24-539), is expected to yield a ruling by early summer 2026, marking a significant moment in the ongoing legal and societal debates surrounding LGBTQ+ rights and mental health practices.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Explores Privatization of $1.6 Trillion Student Loan Debt

The Trump administration is exploring the privatization of parts of the $1.6 trillion federal student loan portfolio, raising concerns about borrower protections and repayment terms.

The Trump administration is considering options to privatize portions of the federal government’s substantial student loan portfolio, which currently stands at $1.6 trillion. This initiative could significantly alter the landscape of student loan management in the United States.

According to sources familiar with the discussions, senior officials from both the Education Department and the Treasury Department are engaged in talks about potentially selling high-performing segments of the federal student loan portfolio. This portfolio is owed by approximately 45 million Americans, and the administration aims to ensure the long-term health of the loans for the benefit of both students and taxpayers.

A senior administration official stated, “The Trump administration is committed to analyzing all aspects of the federal student loan portfolio. Unlike the previous administration, we are focused on ensuring the long-term health of the portfolio for the benefit of both students and taxpayers.”

However, not everyone is optimistic about the potential outcomes of such a move. Eileen Connor, executive director of the Project on Predatory Student Lending, expressed skepticism regarding the administration’s ability to structure a deal that would benefit both taxpayers and borrowers. “The only way for it to make economic sense is to structure the deal in a way that really short-changes borrowers,” she noted.

Connor highlighted that much of the value of federal student debt stems from unique powers that private entities do not possess. These include the ability to collect on loans indefinitely, garnish Social Security benefits and tax refunds, and enjoy broad immunity from lawsuits if the government mishandles borrowers’ debts.

As of late 2025, the total student loan debt in the United States has reached approximately $1.8 trillion, making it one of the largest sources of personal debt in the country. Of this, around $1.66 trillion consists of federal student loans held by over 42 million borrowers. The average federal student loan debt per borrower is roughly $39,000, with many individuals also carrying private loans that exacerbate their financial burdens.

The demographic most affected by this debt is individuals aged 35 to 49, who collectively owe about $570 billion. Additionally, borrowers over the age of 50 are increasingly facing serious repayment challenges. Delinquency rates have surged, exceeding 8% in early 2025, indicating a growing difficulty in meeting loan obligations.

In response to these challenges, the current administration has resumed student loan forgiveness programs under Income-Based Repayment, aiming to alleviate some of the financial pressure on borrowers. However, the potential sale of federal loans to private investors raises significant concerns about the future of loan management and repayment terms.

The rising delinquency rates underscore the repayment challenges many borrowers face. While the resumption of loan forgiveness programs provides some relief, the introduction of privatization could create uncertainty regarding future protections and repayment conditions for borrowers.

As discussions continue, the implications of privatizing parts of the federal student loan portfolio remain to be seen. Stakeholders are closely monitoring these developments, as they could have lasting effects on millions of borrowers across the nation.

Source: Original article

Trump-Era Education Policies Continue to Influence U.S. Universities

President Trump’s proposed cap on international students could significantly alter U.S. higher education, affecting university finances and America’s reputation as a global education leader.

President Donald Trump has proposed a cap on international students in U.S. universities, limiting their enrollment to 15% of an institution’s undergraduate population, with no more than 5% from any single country. This initiative, framed as a national security measure, aims to ensure that foreign students bring exceptional talent to the American economy while addressing concerns about the potential dilution of opportunities for American students.

The proposal raises alarms about the possibility of universities becoming saturated with students whose values may be perceived as “hostile to the United States,” which could pose national security risks. Current statistics indicate that most U.S. universities are below the proposed 15% cap for foreign undergraduates. For instance, institutions like the University of Arizona and the University of Texas report international student shares of approximately 4-5%, while Brown University stands at 13.5%. Only a few universities, such as Dartmouth College, slightly exceed the proposed limit, with a 15.5% international student population.

The 5% cap on single-country representation could significantly impact universities with large concentrations of international students. The University of Southern California (USC), for example, has historically enrolled a substantial number of Chinese undergraduates, with around 1,051 students, slightly above the proposed limit. Similarly, Vanderbilt University faces challenges with 377 Chinese undergraduates, exceeding the 5% cap of 361 students.

Experts warn that implementing such strict caps could hinder access to international talent and adversely affect universities that rely on foreign tuition to sustain their operations. Critics argue that this policy could undermine America’s status as a global education hub and create administrative burdens for institutions tasked with enforcing these limits.

This proposal comes at a time when U.S. universities are already experiencing a decline in foreign student enrollment, a trend influenced by visa restrictions, increased global competition, and shifting student preferences. DePaul University recently informed its faculty of immediate spending cuts following a 30% drop in international student enrollment this fall. This decision reflects a broader trend among U.S. colleges as they adapt to the repercussions of previous education and immigration policies enacted during the Trump administration.

While the exact scale of the budget cuts at DePaul has not been finalized, potential measures could include a hiring freeze, reductions in executive salaries, and limitations on discretionary spending, according to a memo from university president Robert Manuel shared with faculty. DePaul is not alone; at least 35 other U.S. colleges have announced budget reductions in response to policies from the Trump administration. Notably, Johns Hopkins University eliminated over 2,000 positions in March following an $800 million reduction in federal research grants, while Northwestern University cut 425 jobs. The University of Southern California also laid off more than 630 employees, citing declining federal funding and anticipated drops in international student enrollment among other financial challenges.

As universities finalize their fall enrollment figures, a comprehensive national picture is still pending. Preliminary data from the Department of Homeland Security’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) indicates a 2.4% decline in international students this month compared to last September, dropping from 965,437 to 942,131. However, these numbers are subject to change as many institutions have yet to report their updated totals and student movement continues throughout the semester.

Last year, an estimated 1.2 million international students were enrolled in U.S. institutions, according to NAFSA: Association of International Educators. The organization projected in July that this figure could decrease by as much as 15% this year, potentially resulting in an economic loss of nearly $7 billion for the country.

This proposed cap on international students could have far-reaching implications for U.S. higher education, impacting not only university finances but also the nation’s ability to attract global talent and maintain its status as a premier education destination.

Source: Original article

New Jersey Democrat Plans Lawsuit Against Trump Over Troop Deployments

New Jersey gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill has pledged to sue President Trump if he deploys National Guard troops to the state, arguing that such actions would be illegal and unnecessary.

Mikie Sherrill, a former Navy veteran and current representative of New Jersey’s 11th Congressional District, has expressed her strong opposition to the deployment of National Guard troops in her state. During a town hall meeting broadcast live on Univision 41 Nueva York, Sherrill made it clear that she would take legal action against the Trump administration should the president decide to send federal troops to New Jersey.

The town hall audience, which engaged with Sherrill in Spanish while she responded in English, included a member whose family fled the Nicolás Maduro regime in Venezuela. This individual posed a question regarding Sherrill’s stance on potential troop deployments by President Trump. In her response, Sherrill emphasized that American troops should not be patrolling the streets of the country except in extraordinary circumstances, such as during an insurrection or a national crisis.

“Troops are not trained for policing missions like local law enforcement,” Sherrill stated. She further elaborated on her position, saying, “And that’s why, as governor, should Trump try to deploy troops on our streets, I would be very opposed to that. I’d immediately take him to court and demand that he stop this – because I think it’s illegal – and ensure that here in New Jersey, people are kept safe.”

Sherrill is currently running against Republican candidate Jack Ciattarelli in the race to succeed term-limited Democratic Governor Phil Murphy. Her remarks come in the context of President Trump’s recent actions, which have included the deployment or threats of deployment of federal troops to various cities across the United States, including Baltimore, Los Angeles, and Memphis. The administration has characterized these cities as crime-ridden and in need of federal intervention.

In Illinois, Governor J.B. Pritzker has also taken legal action against the Trump administration, seeking to block the deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago. This lawsuit was initiated following a federal judge’s decision to halt the deployment of Guard troops in Portland, Oregon, amid protests related to immigration enforcement.

The Trump administration has defended its troop deployments, asserting that they are essential for curbing violent crime and restoring law and order. However, critics, including various officials, have accused the administration of overreach, arguing that federal intervention often exacerbates tensions rather than alleviating them.

In a recent ruling, a federal judge stated that the Trump administration “willfully” violated federal law by deploying Guard troops to Los Angeles earlier this year in response to protests concerning immigration raids.

As the gubernatorial race heats up, Sherrill’s commitment to legal action against potential troop deployments highlights the ongoing debate over federal intervention in local law enforcement and the implications it holds for state sovereignty and public safety.

Source: Original article

Grandmother Deported to India After Three Decades in the U.S.

A Sikh grandmother who lived in the U.S. for over 30 years was deported to India after enduring harsh conditions in an ICE detention center, raising concerns about the treatment of vulnerable immigrants.

A Sikh grandmother, Harjit Kaur, who had resided in the United States for more than three decades, was deported to New Delhi, India, on September 23. Her deportation followed a week spent in what her attorney described as “barbaric” conditions at a private Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention center in Georgia.

“There was no rationale to detain Bibi Harjit Kaur,” said Deepak Ahluwalia, Kaur’s attorney, in an interview with American Community Media on September 24. “It’s all part of their effort to fill beds.”

Ahluwalia expressed deep concern over Kaur’s treatment, emphasizing her age and health issues. “Her detention was nothing short of barbaric,” he stated. “That type of treatment would affect most people. They chose to do this to a 73-year-old woman with disabilities and health issues.”

Kaur was initially detained at an ICE facility in Bakersfield, California, before being transferred to the Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Georgia, without any notification to her family or attorney.

During her time in detention, Kaur faced numerous challenges. According to Ahluwalia, she was denied water to take her medications and was instead given a plate of ice, which she could not consume due to her dentures. In Lumpkin, she was forced to sleep on the floor in a crowded facility, which was particularly difficult for her given her recent knee surgeries. Additionally, as a strict vegetarian, Kaur was provided meat-based meals for the first six days of her detention. She also experienced multiple instances of being handcuffed during transfers.

The Stewart Detention Center is a private facility operated by CoreCivic, a company that has faced scrutiny for its treatment of detainees.

Kaur, a seamstress who worked at the Berkeley Sari Palace for over 20 years, initially sought asylum in the U.S. in 1991 after the death of her husband. Her asylum claim was based on a credible fear of persecution in India, particularly in the wake of the anti-Sikh riots that followed the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1984. This tragic event led to the deaths of thousands of Sikhs and has been described by many international civil rights organizations as a genocide.

In 2023, California State Assemblywoman Jasmeet Bains introduced AJR2 to recognize the 1984 anti-Sikh riots as genocide. The resolution passed both the state Assembly and Senate without requiring the governor’s signature. A similar measure was introduced in Congress last October by Rep. David Valadao, R-California.

Kaur’s asylum case was denied twice, with the last denial occurring in 2013 by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. After her asylum claim was rejected, she needed travel documents to return to India but had not received the necessary paperwork when she was arrested by ICE on September 8 during a routine check-in at the ICE office in San Francisco. Kaur had consistently complied with immigration authorities, making the required check-ins every six months for the past 12 years.

Her family was unable to sponsor her for permanent residency due to her undocumented status. Ahluwalia explained that an undocumented resident’s family cannot apply for sponsorship while the individual is still in the U.S. Kaur would have needed to return to India to obtain a family-based visa, which was complicated by her lack of travel documents.

In a statement released last week, Kaur’s family expressed their dismay, stating, “Harjit’s case represents a failure of our immigration system. She has been a contributing member of her community for decades, paying taxes, working legally, and building relationships with neighbors and friends. Her detention is not only cruel but unnecessary.”

They further noted, “She has never refused to return to India but cannot without documents.”

Dr. K. Srikar Reddy, the Consul General of India in San Francisco, commented on the situation, stating that it is ICE’s responsibility to request travel documents for individuals being deported. He noted that no such request had been made in the 12 years since Kaur’s asylum claim was rejected.

“Once ICE requests travel documents, it usually takes just a couple of days for us to issue them,” Reddy explained. “But Mrs. Kaur had migrated more than 30 years ago, so we had no information about her. We had to connect with Indian authorities, which took some time.”

When asked whether Kaur might face persecution upon her return to India, Reddy stated, “She was denied by the highest appeals court. That clearly shows that her fears of persecution were unfounded.”

In a statement to NBC News, ICE defended its actions, asserting that Kaur had exhausted all legal remedies several years ago. “ICE is enforcing U.S. law and the orders by the judge; she will not waste any more U.S. tax dollars,” the statement read.

According to the Pew Research Center, India was the fifth largest source of unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. as of 2022-2023, following Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras. Reddy noted a slight increase in requests for travel documents over the past seven months.

Estimates suggest that approximately 1.5 million undocumented individuals over the age of 55 reside in the United States. However, ICE does not provide age-specific data on deportations.

Source: Original article

Brazil Sees Over 120 Methanol Poisoning Cases from Tainted Liquor

Brazil’s Health Ministry reports 127 suspected cases of methanol poisoning linked to tainted liquor, prompting emergency measures and widespread panic across the nation.

The Brazilian Ministry of Health has issued a warning to the public to avoid cocktails following a series of methanol poisoning incidents that have resulted in at least one death and left several others with severe health complications. The alarming situation has triggered a nationwide panic as reports of suspected poisonings continue to rise.

As of now, there are 127 suspected cases of methanol-laced liquor across Brazil, with 11 confirmed cases and 116 others still under investigation. The affected areas include at least five states and the capital, Brasília. Local media reports indicate that victims have included patrons at upscale bars and restaurants, many of whom have experienced life-altering consequences such as blindness or comas after consuming popular Brazilian drinks like caipirinhas and vodka tonics.

Rafael Martinez, a 30-year-old architect from São Paulo, expressed his concerns about the situation. “I’m definitely not going out to drink this weekend. Things are worrying,” he said. “For now, I’d rather stick to soda or, at most, beer, which they said is harder to tamper with.”

In response to the crisis, Health Minister Alexandre Padilha has urged Brazilians to “steer clear of colorless spirits.” The ministry has announced emergency measures, including the acquisition of 2,500 doses of fomepizole, an antidote for methanol poisoning, along with 12,000 ampoules of medical-grade ethanol. Shipments of these antidotes began on Saturday to five states, as the government works to prevent further fatalities.

Most of the reported cases have originated in São Paulo, although instances have also been identified in distant states such as Pernambuco and Mato Grosso do Sul. Padilha assured the public that the new stockpile of antidotes would ensure “no patient goes without treatment,” emphasizing that the antidotes can be administered even before laboratory confirmation of methanol poisoning.

Federal police are currently investigating a potential connection to organized crime groups suspected of distributing counterfeit liquor. Methanol, an industrial chemical, is known to cause serious nerve and liver damage and is often found in fake or poorly distilled alcoholic beverages.

In light of the crisis, many restaurant owners have suspended liquor sales to reassure anxious customers. Nikolaos Loukopoulos, who operates a Greek restaurant in São Paulo, noted, “Last night no one bought drinks … even I don’t want to drink. With a beer, we’re fine in this heat. Why risk it?”

While Rio de Janeiro, a major tourist destination, has not yet reported any confirmed cases, local beach kiosks and restaurants have taken to social media to post warnings aimed at calming visitors. Thais Flores, a 28-year-old dental surgeon visiting Rio from São Paulo, shared her cautious approach to drinking. “I don’t really like beer, but because of the latest news, it’s been my drink of choice,” she said.

Her friend, Raquel Marques, 29, admitted to taking a risk by ordering a vodka caipirinha despite the warnings. “I’m scared, but we took a chance,” she said. “The guy said he bought it at the market.”

The timing of this scare is particularly concerning as Brazil approaches its peak tourism season, raising fears of a significant economic impact on the country’s vibrant beaches and nightlife industry. The situation remains fluid, and authorities continue to monitor and respond to the crisis as it unfolds.

Source: Original article

Supreme Court Begins Pivotal Term Amid Tests for Trump’s Presidency

The Supreme Court’s new term will address significant constitutional questions regarding presidential authority, particularly in relation to President Trump’s executive actions and their legal challenges.

The Supreme Court is set to begin its new term on Monday, focusing on controversial prior rulings and reviewing the sweeping executive agenda of President Donald Trump. After a three-month recess, the nine justices reconvened to reset their docket and discuss appeals that accumulated over the summer. This term, the Court will tackle a range of issues, including gender identity, election redistricting, and free speech. However, the specter of Trump-era legal battles looms large as the administration’s appeals reach the high court for final review.

Since January, the Supreme Court has largely favored the Trump administration in emergency appeals, which primarily addressed whether challenged policies could temporarily go into effect while lower courts deliberated. These cases have encompassed immigration, federal spending cuts, workforce reductions, and policies concerning transgender individuals in the military. The conservative majority, which holds a 6-3 advantage, has reversed approximately two dozen nationwide injunctions imposed by lower federal courts, leading to frustration and confusion among judges.

Legal analysts suggest that the Court may be poised to grant broad unilateral powers to the president as these petitions reach the Supreme Court for final review. The justices have fast-tracked the administration’s appeal concerning tariffs on numerous countries that were previously blocked by lower courts, with oral arguments scheduled for November. In December, they will consider whether to overturn a 90-year precedent regarding the president’s authority to dismiss members of certain federal regulatory agencies, such as the Federal Trade Commission. Additionally, in January, the Court will evaluate President Trump’s power to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors.

Thomas Dupree, a prominent appellate attorney and constitutional law expert, noted, “A big fraction of the Supreme Court’s docket will present the question: ‘can President Trump do?’— then fill in the blank.” This could encompass imposing tariffs, firing independent board members, removing undocumented immigrants, or deploying the military in cities like Los Angeles. Much of the Court’s decisions this term will revolve around whether the president has acted within or exceeded his authority.

The tariffs dispute represents the Court’s first major constitutional test regarding the extent of presidential power, setting a precedent for future appeals related to Trump’s executive agenda. In earlier cases concerning temporary enforcement of these policies, the Court’s liberal justices cautioned against the judiciary becoming a mere rubber stamp for presidential actions. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized her conservative colleagues for accommodating the Trump administration, stating, “Right when the Judiciary should be hunkering down to do all it can to preserve the law’s constraints, the Court opts instead to make vindicating the rule of law and preventing manifestly injurious Government action as difficult as possible.”

Despite these criticisms, some justices have denied that they are facilitating Trump’s aggressive attempts to reshape the federal government. Justice Brett Kavanaugh emphasized the importance of separating powers, stating, “No one person or group of people should have too much power in our system.” Justice Amy Coney Barrett echoed this sentiment, asserting that the Court does not align with political parties and is focused on making impartial decisions. “We’re taking each case and we’re looking at the question of presidential power as it comes,” Barrett remarked.

The ideological divisions within the Court are expected to intensify as justices examine the scope of presidential power and their own authority. Trump has previously suggested that actions taken in the name of national interest may justify legal violations, stating, “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.” Federal courts have been grappling with defining the limits of executive power while also managing their own jurisdiction.

Numerous federal judges, appointed by both Democratic and Republican administrations, have expressed concern over the Supreme Court’s frequent overturning of lower court rulings related to Trump administration policies, often with minimal explanation. These judges, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, conveyed that such actions have created a perception of bias against the president and have left them feeling ineffective in their roles.

Judge James Wynn, a federal appeals judge, criticized the high court for leaving lower courts in a state of uncertainty, stating, “We’re out here flailing… They could easily just give us direction, and we would follow it.” While the Trump administration has achieved short-term victories in a Court where he appointed a third of the justices, the president and his associates have not hesitated to criticize federal judges, even calling for their impeachment when rulings have not favored the administration.

According to an analysis by Stanford University’s Adam Bonica, federal district judges ruled against the Trump administration 94.3% of the time between May and June. However, the Supreme Court has reversed those injunctions over 90% of the time, granting the president temporary authority to advance his reform agenda.

The Supreme Court’s reluctance to directly criticize Trump has been evident, with justices navigating a delicate balance. Justice Sonia Sotomayor recently remarked on the challenges facing the rule of law, stating, “Once we lose our common norms, we’ve lost the rule of law completely.” Chief Justice John Roberts has also publicly addressed the calls for impeachment from the right, emphasizing the need for judicial integrity.

As public confidence in major institutions continues to decline, a recent Fox News poll indicated that 47% of voters approve of the Supreme Court’s performance, a notable increase from the previous year. However, a significant portion of the public perceives the Court as leaning too conservative, with 43% of voters expressing this sentiment.

This term, the Court’s ability to remain apolitical will be tested as it considers several contentious appeals, including those related to same-sex marriage and school prayer. The justices are expected to decide soon whether to include these cases on their argument calendar, with potential rulings anticipated by June 2026.

As the Supreme Court embarks on this pivotal term, the implications of its decisions on presidential power and the broader legal landscape will be closely watched. The outcomes may not only affect the current administration but could also shape the trajectory of future presidencies.

Source: Original article

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Key Cases on Tariffs and LGBTQ Rights

The new U.S. Supreme Court term opens with significant cases that may redefine presidential power and constitutional rights, including issues related to tariffs, birthright citizenship, and LGBTQ rights.

A new term of the U.S. Supreme Court has commenced, bringing with it a series of landmark cases that could significantly reshape the landscape of presidential power and constitutional rights.

At the forefront of this term are President Donald Trump’s assertive claims of executive authority, which are now under intense scrutiny. Several of his controversial policies are set to be reviewed by the Court, including expansive tariff powers, restrictions on birthright citizenship, and the authority of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions.

One of the most anticipated cases will address the participation of transgender girls and women in public school sports. This case will test the legal protections afforded under Title IX, as well as broader constitutional guarantees related to gender identity and equality.

In addition to these issues, the Court will also consider challenges to voting rights, particularly focusing on Louisiana’s redistricting efforts and potential reinterpretations of the Voting Rights Act. These cases are expected to have far-reaching implications for electoral processes and representation in the United States.

Thus far, the Court’s conservative majority has demonstrated a willingness to entertain some of Trump’s emergency appeals. However, as the cases are examined in detail, there is a possibility that the justices may adopt a more cautious approach in their rulings.

Justice Samuel Alito, currently 76 years old, is speculated to be considering retirement in 2026. Should he choose to step down, it would present Trump with the opportunity to appoint another conservative justice, further influencing the ideological balance of the Court.

Legal analysts suggest that this term could be one of the most politically charged in recent memory, with the potential to impact a wide range of issues that resonate deeply with the American public.

As the Supreme Court navigates these high-stakes cases, the outcomes may set significant precedents that could affect the balance of power between the executive branch and the judiciary, as well as the rights of individuals across the nation.

Source: Original article

New Study Finds Leprosy in the Americas Before European Arrival

The discovery of Mycobacterium lepromatosis indicates that leprosy existed in the Americas long before European explorers arrived, challenging previous historical assumptions about the disease.

Scientists have unveiled a significant finding regarding the history of leprosy in the Americas, suggesting that the disease was present long before the arrival of European explorers. Researchers from the Institut Pasteur in Paris, France, in collaboration with a U.S. university, have identified a second species of bacteria responsible for leprosy, known as Hansen’s disease.

Traditionally, it was believed that the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae was the sole cause of leprosy and that it was introduced to the Americas by early European settlers. However, the recent discovery of Mycobacterium lepromatosis challenges this narrative, indicating that a strain of the bacteria was already endemic to the continent prior to European contact.

Dr. Maria Lopopolo, the first author of the study and a researcher at the Laboratory of Microbial Paleogenomics at the Institut Pasteur, emphasized the importance of this finding. “This discovery transforms our understanding of the history of leprosy in America. It shows that a form of the disease was already endemic among Indigenous populations well before the Europeans arrived,” she stated in a news release.

The study, which involved collaboration with the French National Center for Scientific Research and the University of Colorado, was initiated after Mycobacterium lepromatosis was identified in a Mexican patient in 2008 and subsequently in red squirrels in the British Isles in 2016. Researchers employed advanced genetic techniques to reconstruct the genomes of Mycobacterium lepromatosis from ancient individuals in Argentina and Canada.

The results revealed that the two strains from these different regions were closely related within the Mycobacterium genome family tree, suggesting that the bacteria spread rapidly across the continent. This finding confirms that Mycobacterium lepromatosis was already prevalent throughout North and South America.

In their research, the scientists worked closely with Indigenous communities, various international institutions, and archaeologists. They analyzed over 800 DNA samples from ancient human remains and recent medical cases exhibiting signs of leprosy.

Nicolás Rascovan, the lead author of the study at the Institut Pasteur, remarked on the implications of their findings, stating, “We are just beginning to uncover the diversity and global movements of this recently identified pathogen. This study allows us to hypothesize that there might be unknown animal reservoirs.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides information on leprosy, noting that the disease can affect the nerves, skin, and eyes of patients. Leprosy is treatable with antibiotics, and the CDC reports that up to 225 people in the U.S. and approximately 250,000 individuals worldwide contract Hansen’s disease each year.

This groundbreaking research not only alters the historical understanding of leprosy in the Americas but also opens new avenues for exploring the disease’s origins and its impact on Indigenous populations.

Source: Original article

Three Common Fruits May Improve Sleep Quality for Americans

Nutritionist Kendall Mackintosh highlights three fruits that can enhance sleep quality and help Americans fall asleep faster.

As many Americans struggle with sleep, nutritionist Kendall Mackintosh suggests that hitting the fruit aisle might be a beneficial strategy. Certain fruits, rich in natural hormones and antioxidants, can aid in falling asleep more easily.

Mackintosh, a board-certified and licensed dietitian nutritionist, explained to Fox News Digital that some fruits are “rich in melatonin and antioxidants that help regulate circadian rhythms and repair cells overnight.” This insight comes at a time when many are looking for natural solutions to improve their sleep quality.

With the arrival of fall, which brings shorter days and less natural light, Mackintosh emphasizes the importance of supporting melatonin production. “This time of year, supporting melatonin naturally becomes even more important for sleep, mood, and metabolism,” she noted.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 14.5% of Americans reported having trouble falling asleep “most days or every day” in 2020. This statistic underscores the growing need for effective sleep aids.

One fruit that stands out for its sleep-inducing properties is tart cherries. The Cleveland Clinic notes that tart cherries can help increase melatonin levels in the body. Melatonin is a natural hormone produced by the brain’s pineal gland, which plays a crucial role in regulating the sleep-wake cycle.

In addition to melatonin, cherries contain tryptophan, an amino acid that contributes to the production of serotonin and melatonin. Mackintosh recommends Montmorency cherries specifically, as they are known for their tart flavor and high melatonin content.

Another fruit that can aid sleep is kiwi. Mackintosh points to a study published in the National Library of Medicine, which found that consuming kiwis “significantly improved” sleep quality and duration. The four-week study, conducted in 2024, monitored the sleep and recovery of elite athletes, concluding that kiwi consumption led to better subjective sleep quality and daytime function.

Grapes are also highlighted as a potential sleep aid. Registered dietitian Anthony DiMarino informed the Cleveland Clinic that grapes contain a degree of melatonin, making them a suitable evening snack. “They don’t have a lot of calories, and they can potentially help you fall asleep,” DiMarino explained.

However, the way grapes are consumed is crucial for maximizing their benefits. DiMarino advises choosing grapes in their natural form rather than opting for processed alternatives like grape juice or raisins. “What’s most important is that you choose an option closest to its natural form,” he said.

Beyond dietary choices, Mackintosh emphasizes the importance of lifestyle factors in promoting better sleep. She recommends reducing exposure to blue light from screens in the evening and keeping the bedroom cool and dark. “Together, these diet and lifestyle choices create the foundation for deeper rest, better resilience, and long-term vitality,” Mackintosh concluded.

With these insights, incorporating tart cherries, kiwi, and grapes into your diet may offer a natural way to enhance sleep quality and overall well-being.

Source: Original article

U.S. Government Faces Accountability for Migrant Detentions in El Salvador

After 125 days in El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, two Venezuelan nationals were released, prompting calls for accountability from the U.S. government for their detention and treatment.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Venezuelan nationals Edicson Quintero Chacón and Jose Manuel Ramos Bastidas were released yesterday after spending 125 days in El Salvador’s infamous Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT). Their release came on a U.S.-brokered flight back to Venezuela, alongside approximately 250 other Venezuelans detained at CECOT, a facility criticized for its inhumane conditions.

Counsel for both men expressed relief at their release but underscored the urgent need for accountability regarding their initial detention. The U.S. government transferred the men to CECOT on March 15, 2025, where they were held without charges and incommunicado, in a facility known for mass arbitrary detention and mistreatment.

Both Quintero and Bastidas had previously been ordered removed from the United States. They informed a federal court that they wished to return home to Venezuela, but instead, they were sent to CECOT. The agreement between the U.S. and El Salvador stipulated that the U.S. would send members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA), yet there is no evidence linking either man to the gang. Their return to Venezuela was part of a prisoner swap deal that also involved the release of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents from Venezuela.

A family member of Quintero, who requested anonymity, expressed shock at the sudden news of the flights to Venezuela. “Edicson should never have been sent to CECOT in the first place. No one should. He was treated cruelly and inhumanely when all he wanted was safety,” they said. “This so-called prisoner swap doesn’t undo the injustice he suffered, nor the pain and terror that my family has had to endure in the past several months.”

Roynerliz Rodriguez, the partner of Jose Manuel Ramos Bastidas, shared her relief at his release. “We have been waiting for this moment for months, and I feel like I can finally breathe, knowing that Jose Manuel is now free from CECOT and on his way home,” she said. “His son, whom he hasn’t seen since he was four months old, is eagerly waiting for him. These last months have been a living nightmare.”

Concerns remain regarding the legality and transparency of the U.S. government’s actions. Many individuals sent to CECOT had pending asylum claims and expressed credible fears of returning to Venezuela. Their forced return, without due process to address their asylum requests, raises significant questions about the U.S. government’s compliance with both domestic and international legal obligations.

There has been no public accounting of how individuals were selected for transfer to CECOT, nor has there been a comprehensive list of those detained. The lack of transparency raises further concerns about whether all victims are accounted for.

The practice of outsourcing detention to foreign facilities, particularly those with documented records of systemic abuse, poses serious human rights and due process issues. Critics argue that the U.S. government should not engage in such arrangements or collaborate with regimes that violate human rights. A full investigation into these disappearances is necessary, along with safeguards to prevent similar actions by future administrations.

Rebecca Cassler, a senior litigation attorney at the American Immigration Council, stated, “We are deeply relieved that Mr. Quintero Chacón and Mr. Ramos Bastidas are finally released from CECOT, but this should never have happened in the first place. The U.S. government paid to detain these men in one of the world’s most notorious prisons, then denied responsibility while they suffered.”

CJ Sandley, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights, emphasized the inhumane treatment of the detainees. “The deals made for these Venezuelans’ confinement and transfers treat human beings as bargaining chips and underscore the cruel consequences of criminalizing migration and monetizing torture,” he said. “The U.S. government must stop these abuses and uphold its obligations to protect the rights and dignity of all people.”

Stephanie M. Alvarez-Jones, Southeast Regional Attorney at the National Immigration Project, also expressed her relief at the men’s release. “It is unconscionable that they and 250 other Venezuelan men were sent by the United States to be detained at CECOT and forced to endure suffering,” she said. “While we celebrate their long overdue release, the government must be held accountable for its outrageous actions.”

The American Immigration Council, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and the National Immigration Project represent Mr. Quintero Chacón and Mr. Ramos Bastidas in their habeas corpus proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, where they have been fighting for their freedom from CECOT.

Source: Original article

SAAJCO Initiates Lawsuit Against $100,000 H-1B Fee for Indian-Americans

Labor unions, healthcare providers, and educational institutions have filed a lawsuit against President Trump’s new $100,000 fee for H-1B visa applications, claiming it threatens essential services and the economy.

A coalition of labor unions, healthcare providers, educational institutions, and religious organizations has initiated a lawsuit to challenge a recent executive action by President Trump that imposes a $100,000 fee on every new H-1B visa application. Filed on October 3, the lawsuit aims to halt what the plaintiffs describe as an unlawful and detrimental policy that could severely impact the American workforce and economy.

The proclamation, issued on September 19, 2025, and made effective just 36 hours later, has already created confusion among employers, workers, and federal agencies. Kalpana V. Peddibhotla, Executive Director of the South Asian American Justice Collaborative (SAAJCO), emphasized the importance of H-1B workers, stating, “South Asians make up the majority of H-1B workers and are part of the fabric of America, staffing rural hospitals, advancing lifesaving research, and driving innovation in businesses across the country.”

The lawsuit, titled *Global Nurse Force et al v. Trump et al.*, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It argues that the executive order is unconstitutional and violates the Administrative Procedure Act. The coalition of plaintiffs includes organizations such as Global Nurse Force, Global Village Academy Collaborative, and the American Association of University Professors, among others.

The H-1B visa program was established by Congress to attract highly skilled professionals from around the world to fill critical roles in the U.S. economy and public services. This program allows U.S. employers to hire qualified foreign talent, including doctors, nurses, engineers, and researchers, after a thorough vetting process.

The coalition’s lawsuit highlights the potential consequences of the new fee, which they argue could lead to significant harm for communities across the nation. Peddibhotla noted that when the government makes it prohibitively expensive for skilled professionals to come to the U.S., entire communities suffer. “Patients wait longer for care, students have fewer teachers, and local economies miss out on the innovation and jobs these experts create,” she said.

The complaint outlines several key arguments against the new fee. It asserts that the fee violates the legislative framework established by Congress, which includes a carefully structured fee and oversight system for the H-1B program. The plaintiffs contend that the President does not have the authority to unilaterally impose such a fee or to create new taxes through executive action.

Additionally, the lawsuit claims that the proclamation invites chaos and favoritism by introducing a vague “national interest” loophole for fee exemptions, which could lead to arbitrary decision-making. The plaintiffs argue that the fee will disproportionately affect rural hospitals, schools, and nonprofit organizations that rely on H-1B workers to fulfill essential roles.

Economists have pointed out that H-1B workers contribute significantly to job creation and innovation in the U.S. economy. The lawsuit warns that forcing skilled talent to seek opportunities abroad could lead to a loss of jobs and innovation within the country. “Without relief, hospitals will lose medical staff, churches will lose pastors, classrooms will lose teachers, and industries across the country risk losing key innovators,” the complaint states.

The coalition is requesting that the court block the implementation of the $100,000 fee and restore predictability for employers and workers. Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors, expressed concern about the implications of the new policy, stating, “Trump’s restrictions on H-1B visa applications will lead to less lifesaving research, reduced innovation, and diminished competitiveness.”

Dr. Taylor Walker, President of the Committee of Interns and Residents, SEIU, added that the fee would have a devastating impact on healthcare, particularly at a time when the U.S. is facing a physician shortage. “The unconscionable fee for H-1B petitions will reduce the number of resident physicians available to provide care,” he said.

Skye Perryman, President and CEO of Democracy Forward, criticized the fee as a tactic to undermine American innovation and essential work. “This exorbitant fee invites corruption and is unlawful, destabilizing, and bad for everyone,” she stated. “H-1B workers keep rural hospitals staffed, bring STEM education to schools with teacher shortages, advance lifesaving medical research, and help small businesses thrive.”

As the lawsuit progresses, the coalition seeks to have the court declare the proclamation unlawful and prevent the government from enforcing the new fee. Peddibhotla remarked, “We are asking the court to block the government from enforcing the $100,000 fee and require agencies to continue processing H-1B petitions under the law that Congress put in place.”

The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the future of the H-1B visa program and the broader landscape of immigration policy in the United States.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Influence Dominates Key Races as Election Day Approaches

As Election Day 2025 approaches, President Trump’s influence looms large over key gubernatorial races in New Jersey and Virginia, alongside significant ballot measures in California and Pennsylvania.

The upcoming elections in November 2025 feature crucial gubernatorial contests in New Jersey and Virginia, alongside significant ballot propositions regarding congressional redistricting in California and state Supreme Court races in Pennsylvania. Although Donald Trump’s name will not appear on the ballot, his unprecedented second-term agenda and the ongoing federal government shutdown are central themes on the campaign trail as candidates prepare for the pivotal day.

New Jersey and Virginia are the only two states holding gubernatorial elections in the year following a presidential election, making these races critical early indicators of Trump’s popularity and agenda. They serve as important barometers ahead of the midterm elections for the U.S. House and Senate scheduled for the following year.

In New Jersey, the gubernatorial race has become a battleground where Trump’s influence is palpable. Republican nominee Jack Ciattarelli, who has the backing of the former president, argues that his opponent, Democratic nominee Rep. Mikie Sherrill, is using Trump as a political weapon. “Listen, if you get a flat tire on the way home from work today, she’s going to blame it on the president. There isn’t anything she doesn’t blame on the president,” Ciattarelli stated in a recent interview.

Sherrill, on the other hand, has accused Ciattarelli of enabling Trump’s agenda, asserting in a fundraising email, “As Trump has inflicted all this damage on our country, Republican politicians like Jack Ciattarelli have cheered him on every step of the way.” During their first debate, she claimed that Ciattarelli would “do whatever Trump tells him to do,” further intensifying the rhetoric surrounding the race.

The candidates have also exchanged barbs over the ongoing federal government shutdown, which has significant implications for New Jersey. Ciattarelli pointed to Sherrill’s congressional vote against a bipartisan effort to keep the government open, while Sherrill placed the blame for the shutdown squarely on Trump, stating, “This is precisely the extreme MAGA agenda that @Jack4NJ wants to bring to NJ.”

As the two candidates prepare for their second and final debate, Ciattarelli, a former state lawmaker and certified public accountant, downplays the notion that Trump is the dominant issue in the race. He seeks to link Sherrill to the policies of term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy and the long-standing Democratic control of the state legislature.

The race has also been marred by controversy, particularly after reports surfaced regarding Sherrill’s military records. Two weeks ago, it was revealed that the United States Naval Academy had blocked her from attending her graduation in 1994 due to a cheating scandal. Ciattarelli’s campaign has called for Sherrill to release her military records to clarify the situation. However, a subsequent report indicated that the National Personnel Records Center mistakenly released her redacted military files, prompting calls for an investigation from top Democrats.

In Virginia, the gubernatorial race features Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears competing against former Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger. Earle-Sears, who made history as Virginia’s first female lieutenant governor, is vying to succeed GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin, who is ineligible for re-election due to state law prohibiting consecutive terms.

Both candidates are poised to make history, as the winner will become Virginia’s first female governor. If Earle-Sears prevails, she will also be the first Black woman elected as governor in the United States. Trump’s policies and influence are significant factors in this race, particularly as the federal government shutdown is expected to impact Virginia’s economy.

In New York City, the mayoral election is drawing considerable attention, especially with the potential for the city to elect its first Muslim and first millennial mayor. Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old state lawmaker, emerged victorious in the Democratic primary, creating political waves across the nation. He faces challenges from former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is running as an independent after resigning amid scandals, and two-time Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa.

Despite dropping out of the race, current Mayor Eric Adams remains on the ballot, adding to the complexity of the election. Trump’s influence in the race has been notable, given his New York roots and ongoing presence in political discourse.

In California, voters will decide on Proposition 50, which seeks to temporarily suspend the nonpartisan redistricting commission and allow the Democrat-controlled legislature to determine congressional redistricting for the next three election cycles. This move is seen as an effort by Gov. Gavin Newsom and California Democrats to create additional left-leaning congressional seats, countering recent redistricting efforts in Texas that were influenced by Trump.

Finally, in Pennsylvania, three Democrat-leaning justices on the state Supreme Court are facing retention elections after completing their ten-year terms. The outcome of these elections could significantly alter the court’s composition and impact critical issues such as voting rights and reproductive rights in a key battleground state.

As Election Day approaches, the interplay of Trump’s influence and the various races across the country will be closely watched, with implications that could shape the political landscape for years to come.

Source: Original article

FBI Ends Partnership with Anti-Defamation League Amid Conservative Criticism

The FBI has severed its ties with the Anti-Defamation League, citing accusations of the organization spying on conservatives amid a backlash from prominent right-wing figures.

The FBI has officially cut ties with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), alleging that the organization has engaged in spying on conservatives. This announcement was made by FBI Director Kash Patel on Wednesday, following criticism from notable conservatives, including Elon Musk, regarding the ADL’s classification of the late right-wing activist Charlie Kirk in its “Glossary of Extremism and Hate.”

In his statement, Patel highlighted the ADL’s connections to former FBI Director James Comey, who has been a vocal critic of former President Donald Trump. Comey was indicted last week on charges of obstruction and lying to Congress. Patel emphasized, “This FBI won’t partner with political fronts masquerading as watchdogs,” in a post on social media.

Comey, during a 2014 speech at the ADL’s National Leadership Summit, praised the organization for its contributions to law enforcement training. He noted that the FBI had made the ADL’s Law Enforcement and Society training mandatory for its personnel and collaborated with the group to create a “Hate Crimes Training Manual.” Comey described the ADL’s expertise in investigating hate crimes as “essential” and its training as “eye-opening and insightful.”

While Patel did not specifically mention Kirk in his announcement, it came shortly after the ADL removed over 1,000 references to alleged extremism associated with him. The ADL stated that the decision was made because many of the terms were outdated and that some entries had been “intentionally misrepresented and misused.”

The ADL has previously characterized Kirk and his organization, Turning Point USA (TPUSA), as promoting “Christian nationalism” and espousing various conspiracy theories related to election fraud and COVID-19. The organization also claimed that TPUSA attracted racists and that its representatives had made “bigoted remarks” about minority groups and the LGBTQ community. Additionally, it noted that white nationalists had attended TPUSA events, despite the group’s claims of rejecting white supremacist ideology.

Kirk, who was vocal in his criticisms of the ADL while alive, labeled the organization a “hate group that dons a religious mask to justify stoking hatred of the left’s enemies.” In response to Patel’s recent statement, the ADL expressed its “deep respect” for the FBI and for law enforcement officers dedicated to protecting all Americans, regardless of their ancestry, religion, ethnicity, faith, or political affiliation. The ADL reaffirmed its commitment to combating antisemitism, especially in light of a significant increase in such incidents.

Critics of the ADL, including some on the left, have accused the organization of attempting to align itself with conservative figures. They argue that the ADL has been quick to criticize leftist individuals, particularly those who oppose Israeli policies, while offering milder rebukes to Trump associates who have faced allegations of antisemitism.

This severance of ties between the FBI and the ADL marks a significant shift in the relationship between the two organizations, reflecting the growing polarization in American political discourse and the complexities surrounding issues of extremism and hate.

Source: Original article

Kwatra Engages with Indian Armed Forces Medical Team in Washington

Indian Ambassador Vinay Kwatra recently met with the Armed Forces Medical Services of India in Washington, D.C., to strengthen military medical cooperation between India and the United States.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Indian Ambassador to the United States Vinay Kwatra engaged with the visiting officers of the Armed Forces Medical Services of India during their recent trip to Washington.

In a post on X, Kwatra shared details of his interaction with Surgeon Vice Admiral Arti Sarin and her team. He noted that their visit aimed to foster collaboration with their counterparts at U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM), the Defense Health Agency (DHA), and the Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Kwatra emphasized that enhancing cooperation in military medicine is a vital component of the robust bilateral defense relationship between India and the United States.

Despite ongoing tensions related to trade, the security ties between India and the U.S. have remained resilient. This meeting underscores the commitment of both nations to strengthen their defense collaboration.

Earlier in September, Ambassador Kwatra met with U.S. Undersecretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby at the Pentagon. Following their discussion, Kwatra described the meeting as productive, highlighting the importance of reviewing current agendas and establishing actionable paths for various initiatives in India-U.S. defense cooperation. He praised Colby for his deep knowledge and consistent support for their strategic partnership.

Colby also acknowledged the significance of their meeting, expressing his enthusiasm for continuing to enhance defense cooperation with India.

These diplomatic interactions come shortly after the conclusion of the 21st edition of Exercise Yudh Abhyas 2025, an annual bilateral Army-to-Army exercise between India and the United States, which took place in Alaska. The exercise wrapped up on September 14 after two weeks of intensive training.

In a statement released on September 15, the Indian embassy in Washington characterized the exercises as a hallmark of the growing military-to-military interaction between the two nations, aligning with the Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership established between India and the U.S.

As both countries continue to navigate complex geopolitical landscapes, their commitment to strengthening military ties remains a focal point of their relationship.

Source: Original article

Federal Government Shutdown Fuels Political Blame Game in Governor’s Race

The federal government shutdown has intensified the blame game between gubernatorial candidates Jack Ciattarelli and Rep. Mikie Sherrill in New Jersey’s crucial 2025 election.

As the federal government faces its first shutdown in seven years, the political fallout is reverberating beyond Washington, D.C., and into the New Jersey gubernatorial race. This election is one of only two gubernatorial contests taking place in the United States in 2025, making it a focal point for both parties.

Republican nominee Jack Ciattarelli has seized the opportunity to criticize his Democratic opponent, Rep. Mikie Sherrill, in a recent exclusive interview with Fox News Digital. The verbal sparring began when Sherrill, a four-term congresswoman, accused “Washington Republicans” of prioritizing loyalty to former President Donald Trump over the needs of the American people. In response, Ciattarelli quipped that Sherrill would blame Trump for anything, even a flat tire.

“There’s nothing my opponent won’t blame on President Trump,” Ciattarelli said. “As I like to say, if you get a flat [tire] today, it’s President Trump’s fault.” His comments came after he participated in a candidate forum hosted by Fairleigh Dickinson University.

The government shutdown, which commenced early Wednesday morning, has been a contentious issue, with neither side willing to compromise. Democrats are insisting that any agreement to end the shutdown must include an extension of tax credits for the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which are set to expire soon. These credits are vital for millions of Americans who rely on them to afford healthcare.

On the other hand, many Republicans oppose the extension, arguing that it would lead to increased taxpayer-funded healthcare for undocumented immigrants. Sherrill, along with nearly all House Democrats, voted against a Republican stopgap measure that could have temporarily averted the shutdown. Ciattarelli pointed to her vote as evidence of her unwillingness to collaborate with bipartisan efforts to keep the government running.

“I do know that there’s a bipartisan group of congresspeople that are trying to keep the government open,” Ciattarelli stated. “My opponent has decided not to be part of that bipartisan group, and she voted no. And so here we are.”

Sherrill has consistently linked Ciattarelli to Trump, asserting that the shutdown is a direct result of the former president’s influence over the Republican Party. In a social media post, she stated, “This is precisely the extreme MAGA agenda that @Jack4NJ wants to bring to NJ.”

As Election Day approaches, Sherrill holds a slight lead over Ciattarelli in recent polling. A Fox News survey indicates that she is ahead by single digits, a margin that could shift as the candidates prepare for their second and final debate next week.

Ciattarelli, a former state lawmaker and certified public accountant, remains optimistic about his campaign. He noted that endorsements from Democratic mayors across New Jersey reflect a desire for change among voters. “The energy is off the charts,” he asserted.

In the upcoming debate, Ciattarelli plans to focus on specific policy proposals aimed at addressing New Jersey’s challenges. He expressed his intention to highlight instances where Sherrill fails to answer questions directly.

Meanwhile, the race has been further complicated by revelations regarding Sherrill’s military records. A report indicated that she was barred from participating in her 1994 graduation from the United States Naval Academy due to a cheating scandal. Sherrill has accused Ciattarelli of conducting a “witch hunt” over her military records, which were improperly released to a Ciattarelli ally.

Ciattarelli’s campaign has called on Sherrill to clarify the circumstances surrounding her graduation. “He has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar, if you will,” Sherrill said, referring to Ciattarelli’s campaign tactics. “He’s now trying to divert from that.”

The National Archives recently apologized for the improper release of Sherrill’s military records, attributing the error to a government worker’s mistake. Following the breach, Sherrill’s campaign issued cease-and-desist letters to the National Archives and Ciattarelli’s campaign.

In response to the controversy, Ciattarelli maintained that Sherrill’s past actions at the Naval Academy warrant scrutiny. “She needs to come clean on what she did to be punished by the Naval Academy,” he stated.

As both candidates gear up for the final stretch of the campaign, the interplay of national issues, personal attacks, and local concerns will shape the narrative leading to the polls. With early voting set to begin on October 25, the stakes are high for both Ciattarelli and Sherrill as they vie for the governorship of New Jersey.

Source: Original article

Trump Open to Talks with Kim Jong Un Amid Missile Concerns

President Trump remains open to unconditional talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, as South Korea warns that North Korea’s missiles could reach the U.S. mainland.

The White House has confirmed that President Donald Trump is willing to engage in discussions with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un “without any preconditions.” This statement comes amid warnings from South Korea that North Korea’s missile capabilities could potentially reach the U.S. mainland.

A White House official emphasized that Trump, during his first term, held three significant summits with Kim that contributed to stabilizing the Korean Peninsula. “U.S. policy on North Korea has not changed,” the official stated. “President Trump remains open to talking with Kim Jong Un, without any preconditions.”

South Korean Unification Minister Chung Dong-young made a stark assertion in Berlin this week, indicating that North Korea has become one of the few nations capable of launching an attack on the U.S. mainland. “What needs to be acknowledged should be acknowledged rationally,” he told reporters, as reported by the Yonhap News Agency. The White House did not respond to requests for comment regarding Chung’s claims.

Chung also noted that North Korea’s “strategic position is different” now compared to 2018, when Trump and Kim held their first summit in Singapore. “Acknowledging this reality should be the starting point” in addressing the regime, he added.

Experts have long suggested that North Korea possesses the capability to reach the U.S. mainland with intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). Bob Peters, a senior research fellow for strategic deterrence at the Heritage Foundation, stated, “They’ve tested ICBMs for a long time.” However, he pointed out that the critical question remains whether North Korea has developed a warhead capable of being accurately delivered by an ICBM.

Meanwhile, Kim Jong Un has indicated that dialogue with the U.S. is possible, but only on his terms. “If the United States drops the absurd obsession with denuclearizing us and accepts reality, and wants genuine peaceful coexistence, there is no reason for us not to sit down with the United States,” Kim was quoted as saying by state media.

A potential meeting with Kim would mark Trump’s fourth encounter with the North Korean leader, occurring at a time when relations between the two nations have become increasingly strained. In July, the White House reiterated that Trump “remains open to engaging with Leader Kim to achieve a fully denuclearized North Korea.” However, North Korea has made it clear that it will not engage with the U.S. if denuclearization is a precondition.

On Monday, North Korean Vice Foreign Minister Kim Son Gyong addressed the United Nations General Assembly, asserting that his country will never abandon its nuclear program, according to reports from Reuters.

Trump is set to travel to Asia later this month for an economic leaders’ summit with South Korean President Lee Jae-myung. A senior U.S. official indicated that there are currently no plans for a meeting in the Demilitarized Zone with Kim. However, reports suggest that Trump may meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, scheduled for October 30 to November 1. Plans for this meeting are still being finalized.

In a recent call, Xi extended an invitation to Trump and First Lady Melania Trump to visit China, which Trump reciprocated. The U.S. official noted that any progress on nuclear negotiations would depend significantly on China. “The first thing that would need to happen is for the Chinese to acknowledge and be more transparent about its own programs,” the official stated.

Current U.S. estimates suggest that China’s nuclear arsenal may consist of approximately 600 warheads by 2024, with projections reaching 1,000 by 2030. In contrast, North Korea is believed to possess around 50 warheads, with sufficient fissile material for up to 90.

Last year, North Korea declared an “irreversible hegemonic position” following the test-firing of its Hwasong-19 intercontinental ballistic missile, which the regime claims can strike the American mainland. As tensions rise, Trump is reinforcing deterrence while keeping the door open for “talks without preconditions.”

Source: Original article

Nearly Half of Fortune 500 Companies Founded by Immigrants or Their Children

Nearly half of the Fortune 500 companies in 2025 were founded by immigrants or their children, generating significant revenue and employment opportunities across the United States.

WASHINGTON, DC, August 21, 2025 — A recent analysis of the 2025 Fortune 500 list reveals that 46.2 percent of America’s largest companies, or 231 out of 500, were founded by immigrants or their children. These companies collectively generated an impressive $8.6 trillion in revenue during the fiscal year 2024 and employed over 15.4 million people worldwide. This data highlights the crucial role that immigrants play in fostering innovation, driving economic growth, and creating jobs in the United States.

This figure represents the highest level recorded since the American Immigration Council began tracking immigrant entrepreneurs in its annual reviews of the Fortune 500 list in 2011.

“Immigrants are a driving force behind America’s prosperity. We need immigration policies that reflect that, instead of investing billions of dollars into detention, deportation, and making it incredibly difficult for foreign workers to come here or even renew their visas. These reckless policies undermine America’s greatest competitive advantage: the talent and drive of immigrants,” said Nan Wu, director of research at the American Immigration Council.

Companies founded by immigrants or their children have significantly transformed various industries, including technology, retail, and media. Notable names on the list include Amazon, Apple, NVIDIA, Levi Strauss & Co., Ace Hardware, and Sirius XM Holdings.

Key findings from the analysis indicate that these Fortune 500 companies, established by immigrants or their descendants, generated $8.6 trillion in revenue during fiscal year 2024. This revenue, if compared to national GDPs, would rank as the third-largest economy globally.

Moreover, these companies employed over 15.4 million individuals worldwide, a workforce comparable to the population of the fifth-largest U.S. state. Immigrants and their children founded 80 percent of the Fortune 500 companies in professional and other services, 65.6 percent in manufacturing, and 57.5 percent in information technology.

Among the 14 companies that made their debut on the Fortune 500 list this year, 10 were founded by immigrants or their children.

“Immigrants built nearly half of our Fortune 500 companies, created millions of jobs, and keep our economy competitive. And yet U.S. political leaders are making it increasingly difficult for foreign talent to come here or stay. It’s economic self-sabotage. If we want to stay the world’s innovation leader, we should be welcoming immigrants, not attacking them,” stated Steve Hubbard, senior data scientist at the American Immigration Council.

The American Immigration Council has experts available to provide further insights into the benefits that immigrants contribute to the U.S. economy at both national and state levels.

Source: Original article

Vandalism of Gandhi Statue in London Provokes Diplomatic Response

India has condemned the vandalism of a Mahatma Gandhi statue in London, calling for immediate action and highlighting the incident’s disrespectful nature ahead of Gandhi’s upcoming birth anniversary.

The Indian government has expressed outrage following the defacement of a statue of Mahatma Gandhi in London, demanding immediate action against the perpetrators. The Indian High Commission labeled the act as “shameful,” describing it as a violent affront to Gandhi’s enduring philosophy of nonviolence.

The statue, located in Tavistock Square, was unveiled in 1968 to commemorate Gandhi’s time as a law student at University College London. The recent vandalism involved graffiti that included the word “Terrorists” painted on the statue’s base, along with references to “Gandhi, Modi and Hindustani [Indians].” Local authorities are treating the incident as “racially aggravated.” As of now, no arrests have been reported in connection with the case.

In response to the vandalism, Camden Council has dispatched teams to clean the statue, while the Metropolitan Police have initiated a criminal damage investigation. The Indian mission has stated that its representatives are on-site, coordinating efforts to restore the monument’s dignity.

The timing of this incident is particularly sensitive, occurring just days before Gandhi’s 156th birth anniversary on October 2, which also coincides with the International Day of Non-Violence. Traditionally, the statue serves as a focal point for tributes on this day, with floral offerings and hymns often placed at its base.

This is not the first time Gandhi’s likeness has been targeted. In 2014, a statue in Leicester was similarly vandalized. In recent years, there have been ongoing debates in parts of the U.K. regarding the removal of Gandhi monuments.

The Indian government is pressing U.K. authorities for a thorough investigation and swift action to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future, underscoring the need for respect toward historical figures and their legacies.

Source: Original article

Republicans Propose Amendment to Withhold Lawmakers’ Pay During Shutdowns

Lawmakers are advocating for a constitutional amendment that would suspend pay for federal legislators during government shutdowns, emphasizing accountability in Congress.

In a move aimed at increasing accountability among federal lawmakers, Representative Ralph Norman, a Republican from South Carolina, has reintroduced a proposal for a constitutional amendment that would dock the pay of Congress members during government shutdowns. Norman announced the initiative on Tuesday, highlighting the disparity between the financial struggles of federal workers and the continued paychecks received by Congress members during such crises.

“During shutdowns, federal workers are told to ‘do more with less.’ Meanwhile, Congress still cashes paychecks. That’s wrong,” Norman stated in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. He emphasized that his proposed amendment would eliminate pay for lawmakers during shutdowns, with no provision for back pay once the government resumes operations.

Norman’s proposal has garnered support from several Republican colleagues, including Representatives Bob Latta of Ohio, Jack Bergman of Michigan, Eli Crane of Arizona, Cory Mills of Florida, Dusty Johnson of South Dakota, and John Joyce of Pennsylvania, who have all signed on as cosponsors.

The text of the proposed amendment reads: “Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), that the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification.” This resolution aims to ensure that lawmakers do not receive compensation during periods of government shutdowns.

The amendment specifies that a government shutdown is defined as a lapse in appropriations for any federal agency or department due to the failure to enact a regular appropriations bill or continuing resolution. It also grants Congress the authority to enforce this article through appropriate legislation.

The urgency of this proposal comes as the nation braces for a partial government shutdown, which is set to take effect on Wednesday. Both Republicans and Democrats have been exchanging blame for the impasse, failing to reach an agreement to avert a funding lapse by the impending deadline.

<p”Members of Congress have a constitutional duty to fund the government’s essential functions,” Norman remarked in a press release. “If Congress fails to meet that obligation, we should not expect taxpayers to continue paying us for inaction. No one else in America would get paid for failing to fulfill their duties—Congress should face the same principle.”

As discussions continue in Washington, the proposal reflects a growing sentiment among some lawmakers that accountability measures are necessary to ensure that Congress is held responsible for its actions, particularly during times of fiscal uncertainty.

In addition to his legislative efforts, Norman is also running for governor of South Carolina, further emphasizing his commitment to public service and accountability.

Source: Original article

Italy’s Meloni Warns Gaza Flotilla Could Escalate Conflict and Ceasefire Risks

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has criticized a Gaza-bound flotilla, warning it could escalate tensions and jeopardize peace efforts led by former President Donald Trump.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has condemned a Gaza-bound flotilla, which includes anti-Israel activists and notable figures such as Greta Thunberg. Her remarks come as Israel prepares for potential escalations in the ongoing conflict, raising concerns that the flotilla could undermine Donald Trump’s peace initiative.

Meloni asserted that the flotilla aims to disrupt Trump’s peace plan, stating on social media platform X, “The truth is simple: those aids can be delivered without risks. Insisting on wanting to force a naval blockade means making oneself—knowingly or not—an instrument of those who want to blow up every possibility of a ceasefire. Spare us the lesson in morality on peace if your goal is escalation. And do not exploit the civilian population of Gaza if you are not truly interested in their fate.”

The Trump administration has introduced a 20-point plan aimed at ending the conflict in Gaza and facilitating the release of Israeli hostages. However, the flotilla’s actions could redirect the narrative from diplomatic efforts back toward confrontation.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar echoed Meloni’s sentiments, stating on X, “The flotilla to Gaza is not a humanitarian act, but a dangerous provocation intended to inflame tensions and undermine ongoing diplomatic efforts.”

The Global Sumud Flotilla, which describes itself as a “multinational civilian effort to break Israel’s illegal siege of Gaza,” claims this is the largest attempt to breach Israel’s maritime blockade of the Gaza Strip, which has been in place for 18 years. Israel maintains that the blockade is essential for preventing Hamas from acquiring arms.

The flotilla is currently navigating waters within Israel’s exclusive economic zone and is expected to reach Israeli waters around Yom Kippur. It comprises nearly 50 vessels and hundreds of anti-Israel activists. In preparation, Israel has deployed 600 police officers and naval units, establishing a special court at Ktzi’ot Prison to process potential detainees. Security officials have warned of possible provocations at sea, with a senior Israeli police officer stating, “This is a sensitive and complex operation, and we are preparing for provocations.”

The flotilla has garnered international attention not only due to Thunberg’s involvement but also because of its connections across Europe and the region. The fleet departed from Barcelona, with activists supported by groups in Spain, which Israeli authorities allege have ties to Hamas operative Saif Abu Kashk. He is accused of running a front company that allegedly controls many of the ships involved in the flotilla.

Additionally, Turkey has been monitoring the flotilla with drones and has indicated it may offer assistance on humanitarian grounds. However, Turkey has faced accusations of providing shelter to Hamas members within its borders.

For Israel, the challenge lies in preventing the activists from reaching Gaza while avoiding an international incident that could benefit Hamas. As Trump seeks to solidify a peace deal, the impending confrontation at sea threatens to shift media focus away from diplomatic discussions and back toward conflict.

On Tuesday, Israeli officials released documents linking the flotilla’s organizers to Hamas through the Palestinian Conference for Palestinians Abroad (PCPA). This group, established in Turkey in 2017, has been designated a terrorist organization by Israel and is accused of acting as Hamas’s overseas arm.

Source: Original article

Democratic Gubernatorial Nominee Faces Nepotism Accusations Over Children’s Naval Academy Acceptance

New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill faces accusations of nepotism following the acceptance of her children into the U.S. Naval Academy amid ongoing controversies surrounding her military past.

New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill is under scrutiny for alleged nepotism after two of her children were nominated and subsequently accepted into the U.S. Naval Academy. This controversy emerges as Sherrill is also dealing with a separate issue related to a cheating scandal during her own time at the academy.

In a June press release, Sherrill expressed pride in the 24 students from her district who were appointed to various military academies, including her children, Lincoln and Margaret Hedberg. However, the press release did not explicitly identify the two students with her husband’s last name as her children, and a photo accompanying the release did not feature them.

“From my time at the Naval Academy, I remember how challenging the academy’s programs are—both academically and physically,” Sherrill stated in the release. She emphasized the importance of teamwork and overcoming challenges, which she believes prepared her for leadership roles as a military officer. Sherrill wished the best for the young men and women starting their careers as future military leaders.

Members of Congress are responsible for nominating students to service academies, while the academies make the final appointments based on qualifications. Social media users have raised concerns about the fairness of Sherrill’s children’s admissions, particularly since only 22 students from her district were accepted into military academies, with just nine gaining entry to the Naval Academy. The academy is known for its highly competitive admissions process, boasting a mere 9% acceptance rate.

Rasmussen pollster Mark Mitchell took to social media to voice his concerns, stating, “Mikie Sherrill’s two kids are at the Naval Academy, one of the hardest schools to get into, because of her nepotism. Meanwhile, some hardworking, impoverished, and unconnected teenagers lose out on a life dream they earned.”

Journalist Jennifer Jean Miller echoed these sentiments, questioning how Sherrill’s children gained admission while potentially deserving candidates were overlooked. “Far left politicians like Mikie Sherrill like to virtue signal about privilege…yet have no problem exerting their own privilege,” she remarked.

While some have claimed that Sherrill nominated her children, an aide for Democratic Senator Cory Booker confirmed to Fox News Digital that Booker nominated one of Sherrill’s children for the current freshman class. “Each year, Senator Booker, as a member of Congress, has the honor of nominating qualified young people to serve in the United States military service academies,” Booker’s office stated. They emphasized that prospective candidates undergo a rigorous application and screening process to ensure that only the best candidates are recommended based on merit.

Sherrill’s other child received a nomination from now-former Democratic Senator George Helmy, as confirmed by a Helmy spokesperson. In response to the nepotism allegations, Sherrill clarified that her children did not participate in her office’s nomination process to avoid any appearance of conflict of interest. “Instead, they applied to the offices of the U.S. Senators from New Jersey, who also run academy nomination processes each year, and I am proud that they each earned nominations on their own,” she stated.

Sherrill’s office explained that the press release did not include her children because it listed all students from NJ-11 who were appointed to academies, not just those she nominated, which is considered routine for her office.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Sherrill’s campaign described the nepotism accusations as a “depraved attack.” They alleged that the Trump administration, in collaboration with the Ciattarelli campaign, released Sherrill’s unredacted service records, including sensitive personal information, and are now resorting to attacks on her family.

Federal law allows members of Congress to nominate up to 15 candidates for each available vacancy at the U.S. Naval Academy, with each member permitted to have five constituents attending the academy at any given time.

The political landscape in New Jersey has been tense, particularly as the state prepares for its gubernatorial election, one of only two nationwide this year. The race intensified last week when reports surfaced that the Naval Academy had barred Sherrill from participating in her 1994 graduation due to a cheating scandal.

Sherrill’s opponent, Jack Ciattarelli, has called for her to release her military records to clarify the circumstances surrounding her graduation. “What we learned today is that she was part of it in some way, shape or form. Come clean, release the records. Tell us what’s in your disciplinary records. I think the people of New Jersey deserve that,” Ciattarelli stated during an interview.

Adding to the controversy, a report revealed that the National Personnel Records Center mistakenly released Sherrill’s improperly redacted military personnel files, which contained private information, to an ally of Ciattarelli. This incident has prompted calls from prominent Democrats for an investigation into the matter.

Sherrill expressed her outrage, stating, “To have a guy I’m running against, it will stop at nothing, it will stop at nothing, who will illegally obtain records. It’s just beyond the pale.”

The two candidates are set to face off in their second and final debate next week as they vie for the position of governor, succeeding term-limited Democratic Governor Phil Murphy.

Source: Original article

US Considers Weighted Selection Process for H-1B 2027 Season

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is proposing a weighted selection process for the H-1B lottery, prioritizing higher-paid and skilled applicants, which could limit opportunities for lower-wage roles.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced a significant change to the H-1B visa lottery process, as detailed in a notice published in the Federal Register on September 24. The proposed “weighted selection process” aims to prioritize foreign workers who command higher salaries and possess advanced skills, marking a potential shift in how H-1B visas are allocated for the 2027 season.

Under the current system, employers must complete an online registration for each foreign national they wish to sponsor under the cap-subject category. In this arrangement, U.S. employers act as petitioners, while the foreign workers they aim to hire are considered beneficiaries. After all registrations are submitted, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) conducts a random lottery to select from the eligible beneficiaries.

Once a beneficiary is chosen in the lottery, all U.S. employers who submitted registrations for that individual receive a selection notice, allowing them to file an H-1B cap-subject petition on behalf of the selected worker.

The DHS’s proposed revision seeks to move away from a purely random lottery system to one that incorporates additional criteria, thereby creating a weighted approach. This new method is designed to incentivize employers to offer higher salaries and to sponsor positions that require advanced expertise, thereby aligning visa selections more closely with roles that reflect elevated wage levels.

Central to this proposed system is the Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) wage level, which would determine how petitions are weighted. The selection process would prioritize petitions based on the highest wage level that the offered salary meets or exceeds, taking into account the relevant Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code and the location of employment.

In practice, this means that USCIS would first review registrations at OEWS wage level IV, then proceed to levels III, II, and finally I. The term “proffered wage” refers to the salary an employer commits to paying the selected worker, emphasizing the importance of compensation in the selection process.

Each year, the H-1B program allocates 85,000 visas for specialty occupations, with 20,000 of those reserved for individuals holding advanced degrees from U.S. institutions. The proposed weighted selection process aims to direct these limited slots toward candidates with superior skills, qualifications, or compensation, rather than distributing them to lower-paid or less-skilled positions.

As a result of this new framework, securing visas for lower-wage or less-skilled roles could become increasingly challenging. Additionally, the introduction of a $100,000 petition fee presents a significant financial hurdle, compelling companies to carefully assess whether the costs align with their hiring strategies. Together, the increased fees and the proposed weighted selection system could fundamentally alter the landscape of the H-1B visa program.

Experts suggest that the likelihood of implementing this weighted selection process is high, indicating a substantial shift in the H-1B visa allocation strategy. If adopted, these changes could reshape the dynamics of the U.S. labor market, particularly in sectors that traditionally rely on lower-wage foreign workers.

As the DHS continues to refine its proposals, stakeholders in the immigration and employment sectors will be closely monitoring developments regarding the H-1B lottery and its implications for the future of skilled labor in the United States.

Source: Original article

Snapshots from the SALA 2025 Conference Highlight Indian-American Innovations

Bay Area residents celebrated literature and art at the annual SALA 2025 festival, featuring prominent South Asian speakers and a diverse array of discussions and performances.

Bay Area residents enjoyed a vibrant literary weekend at the annual SALA 2025 festival, produced by Art Forum SF on September 13 and 14. The event, which serves as a platform for South Asian literature and arts, attracted a diverse audience eager to engage with contemporary reflections from the subcontinent and its diaspora.

This year’s theme, “Thoughts Without Borders,” highlighted over 24 panel discussions that explored various aspects of literature, art, culinary experiences, and social issues affecting the diaspora. Sobhan Hassanvand of India Currents, a media sponsor of the event, captured the lively atmosphere, filming attendees as they interacted with speakers and enjoyed the festivities.

Among the notable speakers was author Alka Joshi, who participated in a panel titled “Blatant Defiance.” During her discussion with poet Shikha Malaviya, Joshi shared insights into her inspiration and research process for her latest historical fiction novel, Six Days in Bombay. The conversation delved into the life of Amrita Sher-Gil, a pioneering Indian painter, and questioned whether her life was curtailed by her artistic ambitions or the unconventional lifestyle she led in the 1930s across India and Europe.

The festival also featured a variety of food trucks, art and creative writing workshops, book signings, and poetry readings, creating an engaging environment for attendees. Authors had the opportunity to sign copies of their works in the Florence Moore Courtyard, where Joshi expressed her belief in the potential of young people to effect positive change through storytelling. “Young people have so much potential to make this world a better place, to make this world a more accepting place,” she remarked. “One of the ways they can do that is by writing about their history as well as the future that they hope for in this world.”

Another highlight of the festival was a conversation featuring renowned mythologist and author Devdutt Pattanaik, moderated by Dr. Anjali Arondekar, a leading scholar in Feminist Studies. Pattanaik discussed his approach to reinterpreting ancient Indian stories for contemporary audiences, weaving together themes of culture, leadership, and identity.

Acclaimed poet and artist Imtiaz Dharker also participated in the festival, engaging in a thought-provoking discussion with poet Arundhathi Subramaniam. Dharker reflected on her experiences with language, art, and displacement, emphasizing the importance of platforms like SALA in fostering connections among diverse voices. “What SALA is doing is they’re bringing in all kinds of people to listen and to share art, literature, poetry,” Dharker stated. “They are the language of being human, how we live in this world. They give us roots into how we’re going to live.”

SALA 2025 successfully brought together a community of artists, writers, and enthusiasts, celebrating the richness of South Asian culture and its contributions to the global literary landscape. The festival not only showcased established voices but also provided a space for emerging talent to share their stories and perspectives.

As the festival concluded, attendees left with a renewed appreciation for the power of literature and art to bridge cultural divides and inspire dialogue. SALA 2025 reaffirmed its role as a vital platform for exploring the complexities of identity and creativity within the South Asian diaspora.

Source: Original article

Elon Musk Supports Leader of New UK Right-Wing Party

Elon Musk has re-entered British politics by endorsing the new right-wing party Advance UK and criticizing Nigel Farage, amid growing voter dissatisfaction with current political leadership.

Elon Musk has made a notable return to British politics, this time endorsing the newly formed right-wing party, Advance UK, while taking aim at Nigel Farage, the leader of the influential Reform UK party. Musk’s involvement comes at a time of increasing voter frustration with the current political landscape.

In a recent post on X, Musk urged his followers to support Advance UK, led by Ben Habib and Tommy Robinson, stating, “Go with @_AdvanceUK, Ben [Habib] and Tommy [Robinson] for the real change that’s needed to save Britain!” He further criticized Farage, labeling him as “weak sauce” and asserting that Advance UK would be the party to drive real change.

Musk’s engagement in British politics was highlighted earlier this month when he addressed tens of thousands of attendees at the “Unite the Kingdom” rally, organized by Robinson. Joining the event via video link, Musk condemned the left as “the party of murder” and expressed his belief that significant government reform is necessary in Britain. He emphasized that the people should have control rather than a detached bureaucracy.

Advance UK, which is close to gaining official registration, is led by Ben Habib, a former co-deputy chairman of Reform UK. Habib has voiced his belief that the traditional two-party system in Britain is no longer viable, stating, “The Conservatives and Labour Party have had their chance, and now the people want something new.” However, some political analysts question whether this new system can produce a majority government or a viable opposition party.

Alan Mendoza, executive director of the Henry Jackson Society think tank, noted the fragmentation of British politics, which has been fueled by widespread dissatisfaction with political leaders. Polling data from YouGov indicates that Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, and Farage all have unfavorable ratings ranging from 52% to 68%.

Despite Farage’s negative perception, recent polling from Ipsos suggests that Reform UK leads in hypothetical general election scenarios. However, Mendoza cautioned that the timing of the next election remains uncertain, making predictions difficult. “The golden law of British politics is you can’t predict the vote that far ahead,” he remarked.

When questioned about the necessity of Advance UK given Reform UK’s polling strength, Habib criticized Farage’s party as lacking substance. “Reform will not deliver. It stands for nothing. It is a populist party without a political philosophy and without intellectual heft or capability,” he stated, asserting that Farage’s patriotic image is merely a façade.

Despite the potential for Advance UK to attract voters disillusioned with Reform UK, Mendoza suggested that Robinson’s involvement could be detrimental. The recent rally saw some protestors allegedly clashing with police, which could alienate potential supporters. “Most people will not like violence at a political rally,” Mendoza noted.

Voter frustration is particularly pronounced regarding immigration policies, as neither the current government nor its predecessor has effectively addressed the rising tide of legal and illegal immigration. Government data reveals that nearly 50,000 undocumented immigrants, many seeking asylum, arrived in Britain in the year leading up to June, an increase from approximately 39,000 the previous year. The Daily Telegraph reported that migrants now account for 98% of the latest population increase, with the Office for National Statistics estimating that 69.3 million people were living in the country by mid-2024.

Habib has called for a comprehensive approach to immigration reform, advocating for stricter border enforcement and the deportation of illegal migrants. He highlighted the financial burden of housing asylum seekers, who are currently accommodated in hotels at a cost of £5.8 million per day ($7.4 million) to taxpayers.

Earlier this summer, protests erupted in Epping, southeast England, over the use of hotels for asylum seekers. In a separate incident, Farage suspended one of his local councilors over accusations of racism during the demonstrations. Musk responded to this suspension on X, criticizing Farage for failing to defend his party members and asserting that he would not bring about significant political change.

Public sentiment in the U.K. indicates a desire for substantial change, particularly regarding issues of free speech. Earlier this year, incidents involving armed police confronting individuals over online comments about transgender issues have raised concerns about civil liberties.

Despite Musk’s criticisms, a recent YouGov poll suggests that Farage’s Reform UK could achieve a significant victory over Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour Party if an election were held soon. Farage himself acknowledged the rapid growth of his party, stating, “The growth of the party has been astonishing,” and asserting that they are “now coming for Labour.”

As the political landscape in the U.K. continues to evolve, the impact of Musk’s endorsement and the emergence of Advance UK will be closely watched by both supporters and critics alike.

Source: Original article

Former Surgeon General Vivek Murthy Discusses Future of Healthcare in the U.S.

Dr. Vivek Murthy discusses the future of healthcare in the U.S., emphasizing the roles of AI, health policy, and social connections in shaping public health.

Dr. Vivek Murthy, who served as the 19th and 21st Surgeon General of the United States, holds the distinction of being the only member of the Indian Diaspora to have held this position twice. In a recent interview with Mandayam Osuri Thirunarayanan for India Currents, Dr. Murthy shared insights on how artificial intelligence, health policy, and the issue of loneliness will influence the future of healthcare in the country.

This interview has been edited for clarity and conciseness.

Reflecting on his time as the ‘Nation’s Doctor,’ Dr. Murthy described the variety of experiences he encountered daily. “Every day was different,” he said. “On some days, I could be in Washington, D.C., meeting with colleagues and collaborators throughout the Department of Health and Human Services at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).”

He also noted that his responsibilities included engaging with legislators on Capitol Hill regarding critical public health issues and policy measures. “I spent time internally working with our team to prepare advisories and reports and to design campaigns that would help advance public health causes,” he added.

When asked about the impact of the Surgeon General’s office on health policy and legislation, Dr. Murthy explained, “The Surgeon General’s Office doesn’t create laws or issue funding. It works directly with communities on public health education and with lawmakers to inform policy.” He emphasized that the public health priorities set by the office often help shape public understanding and influence policy decisions at various levels.

Dr. Murthy’s extensive travels across the United States and abroad have significantly informed his work. “My team and I traveled a lot and visited communities all across America, and even outside of America, in Japan, India, and the United Kingdom,” he said. He highlighted the importance of listening to communities during town halls, church gatherings, and school visits, which led to advisories and public health campaigns grounded in scientific evidence.

Among the notable campaigns he referenced were those addressing youth mental health and the epidemic of loneliness and isolation. “Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on the Healing Effects of Social Connection and Community” was particularly impactful, he noted.

As for the role of artificial intelligence and robotics in healthcare, Dr. Murthy expressed both optimism and caution. “Artificial intelligence is already changing health care as well as scientific research and discovery,” he stated. He acknowledged the benefits AI brings to the healthcare system but also stressed the importance of managing its risks. “AI and robots could have a negative impact on social interactions,” he warned, emphasizing that human empathy and care cannot be replicated by machines.

Dr. Murthy elaborated on the limitations of AI, stating, “Algorithm-based AI and robots can never substitute for human beings. They can augment our lives, but they never fully replace our friends, family, and the people who care for us.” He underscored the value of human imperfection in relationships, noting that AI cannot replicate the authenticity of human interactions.

When discussing loneliness, Dr. Murthy acknowledged that while AI might serve as a social coach or prompt individuals to reach out to loved ones, it should never replace genuine human interaction.

Reflecting on his major accomplishments as Surgeon General, Dr. Murthy expressed pride in broadening the understanding of health beyond just physical aspects. “We expanded that notion to include mental, social, and spiritual dimensions of health,” he explained. He emphasized the importance of mental health and social relationships, highlighting the Surgeon General’s Advisory on loneliness and isolation as a significant contribution to public health discourse.

Dr. Murthy also discussed the challenges he faced in his role, particularly the difficulty of prioritizing health issues amid limited resources. “With limited time and resources, we chose to focus our efforts on health issues that were not being addressed and where there was little public awareness,” he said. Navigating the diverse stakeholders involved in public health was another challenge he encountered, including federal agencies, Congress members, community groups, and healthcare providers.

For the Indian Diaspora, Dr. Murthy offered essential health advice, emphasizing the importance of prevention. He outlined five pillars for disease prevention: sleep, social connection, stress reduction, nutrition, and physical activity. He stressed the need for quality sleep, the value of maintaining close friendships, and the importance of managing stress in today’s fast-paced world.

In terms of nutrition, Dr. Murthy advised minimizing ultra-processed foods and focusing on balanced diets. He also highlighted the benefits of regular physical activity, such as walking and resistance exercises, in promoting overall health.

“These five pillars can do a lot to help reduce our risk of cardiac disease, cancer, diabetes, and other illnesses,” he concluded. “They can also improve how we feel.”

Source: Original article

Author Manu S. Pillai Discusses Politics of History at SALA 2025

Young historian Manu S. Pillai shared insights on the complexities of Indian history and the role of contemporary perspectives during a panel discussion at SALA 2025.

Manu S. Pillai, a prominent historian and author, has garnered attention for his ability to reimagine Indian history through engaging storytelling and modern interpretations of power and empire. At the South Asian Literature and Art Festival (SALA) 2025, Pillai participated in a panel discussion with author and journalist Salil Tripathi, where they explored the intricacies of history and the challenges faced by historians today.

The session began with a light-hearted exchange, as Tripathi suggested that Pillai was mischaracterized as “one of India’s best young historians,” arguing instead that he should be recognized simply as “one of India’s best historians.” Pillai, in his mid-30s, found the label somewhat irritating, reflecting on how he would likely view this moment of youthful frustration in the years to come.

The humor that characterized the opening of the discussion continued throughout the session, which was filled with valuable insights and advice for younger generations interested in history.

During the conversation, Tripathi raised the question of whether rational discussions about history are even possible in today’s context. Pillai recounted his experience following the publication of his first book, The Ivory Throne (HarperCollins, 2016), which led to a defamation lawsuit from the royal family of Travancore. They objected to his portrayal of the Maharaja, who was revered as “Pratyaksha Padmanabhan,” an embodiment of the deity Vishnu. Despite the legal pushback, the family’s lawyers humorously noted their enjoyment of the book.

Pillai noted that such hypersensitivity is not uncommon in contemporary India, where he has faced backlash for referring to historical figures like Shivaji without the customary honorifics. He emphasized the importance of understanding people rather than judging them, while also advocating for historians to engage with younger audiences through social media, given its growing influence over traditional reading habits.

As the discussion progressed, Pillai highlighted how different generations interpret history through their unique lenses. He argued that the disdain some hold for historians can be countered by avoiding the temptation to “whitewash” the past. He acknowledged the historical presence of violence and strife, but also pointed out that places of worship often served as centers of commerce and peace. For example, while Tipu Sultan may have been known for his military actions, he also made offerings to temples, illustrating the complexity of historical narratives.

Tripathi noted that attacks on historical narratives are not limited to India, citing examples from the United States, where critical race theory and exhibits at institutions like the Smithsonian have faced scrutiny. Pillai agreed, expressing relief that this struggle between memory and history is a global issue, and he remarked on the inevitability of human folly in the repetition of history.

Pillai expressed a fascination with the “mixed-up element of history,” sharing anecdotes from Maharashtra, where he grew up. He mentioned historical figures like Malik Ambar, a black military slave who married local women, and the presence of black queens in the region during the 16th and 17th centuries. He also touched on the influence of Chinese culture in India, noting how common items bear Chinese names, and shared a personal revelation from a DNA test that traced his ancestry back to a Malayali Christian.

His latest book, Gods, Guns and Missionaries (Penguin Random House / Allen Lane, 2025), distinguishes between Hindu thought, Hinduism, and Hindutva. Pillai explained how religious practices evolve under various influences, highlighting the ongoing changes in Islam and Hinduism in contemporary India.

When an audience member questioned the assertion that “there was no India before 1947,” Pillai referenced William Dalrymple’s recent work, The Golden Road: How Ancient India Transformed the World. He clarified that while the term “India” may not have existed, there was a shared cultural zone that connected various regions.

Pillai offered sage advice on the importance of speaking truth to power and cultivating diverse reading habits. He urged young readers to avoid relying solely on social media for information, encouraging them to read widely and critically. “Never swallow or believe everything you’re told,” he advised, emphasizing the importance of questioning and critical thinking.

He also discussed the fear that those in power often have of comedians, noting that when people cannot take a joke, they resort to controlling narratives. Pillai shared examples of resistance through parody, including a Telugu play that humorously critiqued societal norms. He praised regional films, such as The Great Indian Kitchen, for their ability to confront cultural taboos.

In response to concerns about the erosion of rights, Pillai encouraged the audience to “fight small battles every day.” He likened this approach to lighting many small lamps in a dark room, suggesting that while each effort may seem insignificant, together they can create a powerful illumination of change.

Pillai’s insights at SALA 2025 underscored the complexities of history and the importance of engaging with it critically and thoughtfully, particularly in an era where narratives are often contested.

Source: Original article

Portland Mayor Criticizes Federal Intervention Amid Controversial Video Claims

Portland Mayor Keith Wilson has condemned President Trump’s plan to deploy federal troops to the city, asserting that there is no current lawlessness or violence in the area.

Portland Mayor Keith Wilson voiced strong opposition on Saturday to President Donald Trump’s announcement regarding the deployment of federal troops to Oregon’s largest city. The president’s decision comes amid ongoing protests and heightened tensions between federal authorities and local activists.

In a statement made during a news conference, Wilson asserted that there is no need for military intervention in Portland, declaring that the number of troops required is “zero.” He emphasized that the city is not a military target, stating, “This is an American city. We do not need any intervention.”

Trump’s announcement, made early Saturday morning, indicated that he had directed War Secretary Pete Hegseth to provide “all necessary troops to protect war-ravaged Portland, and any of our ICE facilities under siege from attack by Antifa and other domestic terrorists.” The president suggested he would authorize full force if necessary to address what he described as lawlessness.

In response, Wilson criticized the portrayal of Portland as a city in chaos, claiming that video footage of violence being circulated was outdated, stating it was “recycled and then recycled again” from incidents that occurred five years ago. He insisted that if Trump were to visit Portland today, he would see a community engaged in everyday activities such as riding bikes, playing sports, and shopping at local markets.

Wilson highlighted the progress the city has made since the footage was recorded, noting reforms in the public safety system and efforts to support vulnerable populations. “We’ve had hard conversations, and we’ve done important work in the years since that footage was taken,” he said.

Protests have intensified near the ICE facility in Portland since June, with city officials citing land use violations, including improper detainee holding times and boarded-up windows. The facility has been the site of vandalism and clashes between protesters and federal agents, occasionally resulting in violent confrontations. Law enforcement has responded with rubber bullets, tear gas, and flashbangs to disperse crowds during these events.

In August, video footage captured a particularly violent protest, showing demonstrators rolling out a guillotine, setting fires, and clashing with authorities. This incident prompted law enforcement to take action to control the situation.

Rather than sending troops to Portland, Wilson suggested that the president consider dispatching “hundreds of engineers, or teachers, or outreach workers” to the city. He expressed disappointment with the federal government’s approach, stating, “At the end of the day, this may be a show of force, but that’s all it is. It’s a big show, and after the big show, everyone goes home.”

Wilson emphasized Portland’s long-standing tradition of peaceful protest and its commitment to positive social change. He expressed concern over the potential risks associated with the federal intervention, noting that the administration has not clarified what it means by deploying “full force” against the city and its residents.

While Trump did not explicitly state that he would deploy full force against Portland’s citizens, he did mention sending “all necessary troops” to protect the city and its ICE facilities, authorizing full force against domestic terrorism if deemed necessary.

Portland has been designated a sanctuary city since 2017, resisting federal immigration enforcement and becoming a focal point in the administration’s immigration enforcement initiatives. In August, Attorney General Pam Bondi sent a letter to Wilson, warning that the city’s sanctuary policies undermine U.S. interests and demanding compliance with federal law.

The City of Portland did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the situation.

Source: Original article

Trump Agency’s Social Media Reach Exceeds MSNBC, CNN Viewership, DHS Reports

The Department of Homeland Security’s social media reach has significantly surpassed that of MSNBC and CNN, according to recent metrics obtained by Fox News Digital.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reported that its social media reach outperformed that of legacy media outlets MSNBC and CNN during the summer months, with millions of media impressions across various platforms.

Exclusive metrics obtained by Fox News Digital reveal that DHS’s social media accounts, which include channels on Facebook, Instagram, and X, garnered approximately 6,395,700 daily impressions in July. This figure starkly contrasts with the daily viewership numbers for MSNBC and CNN, which averaged about 502,000 and 333,000 viewers, respectively.

In prime time, MSNBC attracted around 738,000 viewers, while CNN’s viewership reached approximately 440,000, according to data from Nielsen Media Research. The previous month, June, also saw DHS outperforming these outlets, with social media impressions totaling roughly 3,390,600. During that time, MSNBC averaged 593,000 daily viewers, and CNN had about 450,000.

The metrics compiled by DHS were derived from internal reports, which were subsequently verified using Sprout Social, a social media management tool. An “impression” is defined as the number of times a post or content appears on a user’s screen, regardless of whether the user engages with it.

DHS has adopted a distinctive approach to its social media strategy, incorporating memes, GIFs, and traditional American-style recruiting graphics to promote U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Sources within DHS indicated that one of their goals is to depict an idealized vision of what an American homeland represents.

This innovative strategy has not only been employed by DHS but has also been mirrored by other government agencies and the White House. Notably, during the Trump administration, DHS experienced a remarkable 34-fold increase in weekly reach compared to the Biden administration. In July 2024, the Biden administration’s DHS reported just 700,000 weekly impressions, while the Trump administration’s DHS, under Secretary Kristi Noem, achieved an impressive 46.1 million impressions.

Despite receiving criticism from some legacy media outlets regarding its social media style, DHS remains committed to its current approach, including the ongoing ICE recruiting campaign. A Washington Post opinion piece even labeled the agency’s videos as “preposterous,” suggesting they were part of a “holy war” to promote their agenda.

As the landscape of media consumption continues to evolve, the Department of Homeland Security’s social media strategy exemplifies a shift in how government agencies engage with the public, aiming to reach audiences where they are most active.

Source: Original article

8th US-India Conference to Address AI, Global Dynamics, and Biomedical Advances

The eighth annual US-India Conference will address the evolving relationship between the two nations, focusing on artificial intelligence, global dynamics, and biomedical advancements.

As the geopolitical and technological landscape shifts rapidly, the eighth annual US-India Conference is set to explore one of the world’s most significant partnerships during a critical moment of reassessment.

The US-India relationship currently stands at a crossroads, balancing strategic pragmatism with shared democratic values. Recent tensions surrounding trade, tariffs, and technology have prompted discussions about whether the partnership is undergoing a recalibration or simply cooling. This year’s conference, titled US India: Normalization or Reset?, aims to examine how both countries can reassess their priorities and either restore normalcy or redefine their relationship in a multipolar world.

Scheduled for Tuesday, October 7, at 2:30 p.m., the conference will take place at the University of California, Santa Cruz’s Silicon Valley Campus in Santa Clara. Key themes will include governance of artificial intelligence, dynamics of global conflict, and biomedical breakthroughs that could significantly impact human health.

The All India Management Association (AIMA), which co-hosts the event with UC Santa Cruz, is the apex body for management in India, representing nearly 6,000 corporate and institutional members from both public and private sectors. The US-India Conference serves as a vital platform for insightful discussions and exchanges regarding the evolving landscape of business, technology, and international relations. This event fosters an environment where leaders from both nations can share valuable insights into the India-US partnership.

“The need for strong U.S.-India collaboration has never been greater,” stated Sunil Kant Munjal, Chairman International of AIMA and Chairman of Hero Enterprise. “This gathering offers an opportunity to examine how our two nations can join forces to tackle pressing global issues and contribute to the benefit of our two nations and our people.”

The conference will attract corporate executives, professionals, members of U.S.-India trade and economic bodies, researchers, scholars, and students, all engaging in thought-provoking discussions about the future of U.S.-India relations.

“UC Santa Cruz is proud to once again partner with AIMA to convene this global gathering,” remarked UC Santa Cruz Chancellor Cynthia Larive. “Looking ahead, collaboration in technology, innovation, and other emerging fields will be essential to advancing prosperity for both nations. This conference helps shape the conversation and shows possible paths to a positive and sustainable future.”

Sessions will delve into various topics, including:

Recent shifts in US-India ties and the roots of friction, focusing on how leaders might reframe priorities, manage divergence, and steer the relationship toward strategic coherence.

The emerging competition over AI standards, access to critical technologies, and regulatory influence.

The fragility of global order, the risks of escalating conflict, and the roles India and the US can play in rebalancing global cooperation.

How AI, genomics, and metabolic science are converging to personalize and revolutionize human wellbeing.

Panelists will include influential leaders from major organizations such as Google, Tata Steel, Hero Group, Triveni Turbine Ltd, Trivium, Tata Chemicals Ltd, and UC Santa Cruz. Following the panel discussions, attendees will have the opportunity to network with Silicon Valley executives and the visiting delegation of CEOs.

For those interested, registration to attend the conference is available, along with additional information about the event.

Source: Original article

Santa Clara County Starts Mailing Voter Guides for November 4 Election

The Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters has started mailing voter information guides to registered voters ahead of the November 4, 2025, Statewide Special Election.

The Registrar of Voters’ Office (ROV) in Santa Clara County has commenced the mailing of County Voter Information Guides to all registered voters for the upcoming November 4, 2025, Statewide Special Election. This guide is designed to provide essential information about the candidates and measures that will appear on the ballot, as well as details regarding Vote Center locations, Official Ballot Drop Box sites, a sample of the Official Ballot, and various election resources to assist voters in preparing to cast their ballots.

Voter guides are being sent to all active voters who are registered by the deadline of October 4, 2025. For those who have indicated a preference for voting materials in languages other than English, translated voter guides are available in Chinese, Spanish, Tagalog, and Vietnamese. Voters can conveniently check their registration status, register to vote, update their registration, or change their preferred language online at www.sccvote.org.

Matt Moreles, the Registrar of Voters, emphasized the importance of the County Voter Information Guide, stating, “With so many impactful issues in this special election, the County Voter Information Guide is an important tool to help voters successfully cast their ballot. Our goal is to provide a trusted source of nonpartisan election information so voters can learn what’s on the ballot, how and where to return their ballot, and the various language and accessibility options available for voters to make their voices heard in this election.”

In an effort to promote environmental sustainability, voters are encouraged to opt-out of receiving a printed paper voter guide and instead choose to receive an electronic version, which is available in all mandated languages. This environmentally friendly option can be selected in under five minutes by visiting sccvote.org/gogreen. Voters who choose the paperless option will receive an email containing a link to the online version of the voter guide.

Additionally, Vote by Mail packets, which will include the official ballot for this election, are scheduled to be mailed to all active registered voters on October 6, 2025.

For further information or assistance, voters can reach out to the Registrar of Voters’ Office at (408) 299-VOTE (8683) or toll-free at (866) 430-VOTE (8683), or they can visit www.sccvote.org.

Source: Original article

John Roberts’ Two Decades on the Supreme Court and His Impact

Chief Justice John Roberts marks 20 years on the U.S. Supreme Court, navigating a conservative shift in jurisprudence, particularly in cases involving former President Donald Trump.

Chief Justice John Roberts is celebrating two decades in his role at the U.S. Supreme Court, a period marked by a significant shift toward conservative jurisprudence, particularly in cases related to former President Donald Trump. Throughout his tenure, Roberts has guided the Court through pivotal rulings concerning presidential immunity, administrative power, and various social issues, all while managing the delicate balance between institutional restraint and the pressures of partisanship.

Roberts has occasionally diverged from his conservative colleagues, yet he frequently aligns with major decisions that enhance executive authority. His leadership style has been characterized by a commitment to preserving the Court’s legitimacy, even when faced with the challenge of issuing controversial rulings. Critics argue that his approach has contributed to the consolidation of power within the executive branch, while supporters contend that he has effectively corrected instances of overreach and maintained legal consistency.

As Roberts embarks on his third decade as Chief Justice, the Supreme Court continues to confront urgent issues that challenge constitutional boundaries and the balance of power among the branches of government. His influence on the Court’s trajectory during this time will likely resonate for years to come, shaping not only legal precedents but also the broader political landscape.

According to Global Net News, Roberts’ tenure reflects a complex interplay of judicial philosophy and the realities of contemporary governance, illustrating the evolving role of the Supreme Court in American society.

Source: Original article

South Asian Healthcare Leaders Work to Rebuild Trust in U.S. Medicine

Leading South Asian healthcare professionals convened to discuss strategies for rebuilding public trust in medicine amid rising health misinformation.

WASHINGTON, DC – On September 16, the South Asian Impact Foundation hosted a panel featuring prominent South Asian voices in medicine and public health. The event aimed to tackle a significant challenge of our time: the urgent need to rebuild public trust in healthcare.

The panel, titled “Beyond the Exam Room: South Asian Health Leaders Shaping Public Trust,” brought together a diverse group of physicians and public officials whose influence spans from social media platforms to state legislatures.

Moderated by Dr. Vin Gupta, a medical analyst for NBC and MSNBC, the discussion took place at the Marriott Hotel and highlighted how South Asian professionals are utilizing their expertise to combat misinformation, foster relatability, and protect the health of various communities.

Among the panelists were Dr. Meena Seshamani, Maryland Secretary of Health and former head of Medicare; Dr. Arif Kamal, Chief Patient Officer of the American Cancer Society; Representative Arvind Venkat, a physician and the first Indian American elected to the Pennsylvania State House; and Dr. Mona Amin, a pediatrician and founder of PedsDocTalk, whose health and parenting content reaches over two million people across platforms like Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and podcasts.

South Asians represent one of the most significant demographics within America’s medical workforce. However, as the panel illustrated, their influence goes well beyond clinical care. In an age marked by rampant health misinformation, these professionals are leveraging every available avenue—policy, journalism, organized medicine, and social media—to translate scientific knowledge into accessible, human-centered messages.

“Relatability is the root of trust,” stated Dr. Arif Kamal, emphasizing that meaningful connections begin with shared experiences. Dr. Seshamani shared insights from her leadership during Medicare’s historic drug price negotiations, noting, “Even when we didn’t agree, stakeholders understood why we made the decisions we did. Respect and transparency are how we break down walls.”

Representative Arvind Venkat discussed how his advocacy during the COVID-19 pandemic as an emergency physician led him to a political career. “All politics is local,” he remarked, encouraging young South Asians to articulate their motivations and seek mentorship beyond the medical field. For him, this meant applying his expertise to legislative solutions, especially in areas where healthcare consolidation and regulation impact patients the most.

Dr. Mona Amin emphasized the significance of digital platforms in reaching millions of families globally. Her contributions to health education, parenting advice, and vaccine advocacy have established her as a trusted pediatric voice across continents. “You can’t do it all,” she reflected, highlighting the importance of recognizing one’s strengths. “But you can use your superpower to help the world.”

A recurring theme emerged throughout the discussion: humility, storytelling, and persistence are vital for navigating spaces where doctors are not traditionally recognized, whether in politics, policymaking, or digital advocacy. “Our stories are our strengths,” Dr. Seshamani urged, encouraging younger professionals to draw from both personal and professional experiences in shaping their public roles.

The panelists also acknowledged the challenges posed by online trolls, political divisions, and institutional inertia. However, they underscored that South Asian professionals are uniquely positioned to bridge these divides. Whether addressing cancer disparities, advocating for fair drug pricing, or providing parenting advice online, their relatability is crucial in fostering trust when it is most needed.

As moderator Dr. Gupta summarized, the contributions of South Asian health leaders illustrate that modern medicine encompasses more than just diagnoses and prescriptions. It involves fostering resilience, building informed communities, and expanding the definition of what it means to be a doctor, public servant, or health advocate.

Source: Original article

North Carolina Democrat Denies Link Between Train Attack and Suspect’s Releases

North Carolina state Rep. Marcia Morey faces backlash for asserting there is “no correlation” between the murder of Iryna Zarutska and the accused killer’s multiple jail releases.

North Carolina state Representative Marcia Morey, a Democrat, is facing significant criticism for her assertion that there is “no correlation” between the murder of Iryna Zarutska and the repeated releases of her alleged killer from jail. Zarutska, a 23-year-old refugee from Ukraine, was tragically murdered, and the circumstances surrounding her death have reignited debates over the state’s bail system.

Decarlos Brown, the man accused of killing Zarutska, has been described by authorities as a dangerous career criminal. He had been in and out of jail 14 times prior to the incident, raising concerns among critics who argue that a flawed bail system allowed him to remain free despite his violent history. Many believe that the system’s failures contributed directly to Zarutska’s death.

In response to the backlash, Morey defended her comments during a legislative session, emphasizing her commitment to bail reform. “But don’t correlate what happened in January and a magistrate who set a bail according to guidelines to what happened in August. There is no correlation,” she stated, attempting to separate the judicial decisions made in the past from the tragic outcome of Zarutska’s murder.

However, her remarks have been met with strong opposition from various lawmakers who argue that the incident exemplifies the dangers of allowing repeat offenders back into the community. Republican Senate Leader Phil Berger expressed his outrage, stating, “Iryna should still be alive. She should be thriving and enjoying time with her family and friends.” He criticized the current bail reform measures, claiming they compromise public safety by prioritizing the rights of defendants over the safety of victims.

In the wake of Zarutska’s murder, North Carolina lawmakers have proposed “Iryna’s Law,” aimed at eliminating cashless bail in an effort to enhance public safety and hold violent offenders accountable. This legislative move reflects a growing sentiment among some lawmakers that the existing bail policies need to be reevaluated in light of the tragic events.

Supporters of bail reform, however, argue that the current system disproportionately affects low-income defendants who cannot afford bail, leading to unjust incarceration. They contend that the focus should be on reforming the system to ensure fairness rather than simply increasing punitive measures against repeat offenders.

The debate surrounding bail reform and public safety continues to intensify in North Carolina, particularly as families of victims like Zarutska advocate for changes that could prevent similar tragedies in the future. As lawmakers grapple with these complex issues, the conversation around justice, accountability, and the rights of defendants remains at the forefront of public discourse.

According to Fox News, the ongoing discussions highlight the challenges of balancing the need for public safety with the principles of justice and fairness in the legal system.

Source: Original article

Zelenskyy Open to Leaving Office and Elections If War Ends

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed readiness to leave office once the war with Russia concludes, emphasizing peace over personal political ambitions.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has indicated that he is prepared to step down from his position once Russia’s war against Ukraine comes to an end. In an interview with Axios, Zelenskyy emphasized that his primary focus is achieving peace rather than securing another term in office.

“My goal is to finish the war,” Zelenskyy stated during the interview with Barak Ravid, which took place after his address to the United Nations General Assembly in New York and prior to his return to Kyiv.

When asked whether Ukraine would hold elections during a ceasefire, Zelenskyy was unequivocal in his response. “So do you commit that if tomorrow, President Putin agrees for a ceasefire of three months, six months, whatever, you will push forward to go for elections in Ukraine?” Ravid inquired. Zelenskyy replied, “Yes.”

Further pressed on whether he could envision leading Ukraine in a peacetime scenario, Zelenskyy reiterated his willingness to step aside once the war is concluded. “If we will finish the war with Russia? Yes,” he affirmed. However, he clarified that elections are not his personal ambition. “It’s not my goal, elections,” he explained. “I want it very much, in a very difficult period of time, to be with my country, help my country. Yes, that is what I wanted. My goal is to finish the war,” he stated.

Zelenskyy’s comments come at a time when Ukraine remains under martial law, a measure that has been in place since Russia’s full-scale invasion began in February 2022. Under martial law, elections cannot be conducted.

First elected in 2019 by a significant margin, Zelenskyy would have seen his five-year term conclude in May 2024 had the war not erupted. As it stands, he has been in office for over six years, surpassing his original mandate.

Fox News Digital has reached out to Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s office for further comment.

Source: Original article

Abbas to Address UN Amid Visa Dispute and Hamas Concerns

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas calls for Hamas to surrender its weapons and advocates for a ceasefire ahead of his upcoming address to the United Nations General Assembly.

Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas is scheduled to address the United Nations General Assembly on Thursday via video link, following the revocation of his visa by the U.S. last month. The U.N. recently voted 145-5 to allow Abbas to speak at this significant international event, despite the U.S. accusing the Palestinian leadership of undermining peace efforts and barring entry for approximately 80 Palestinians.

It remains uncertain how Abbas’ upcoming address will differ from his remarks made on Monday at an event co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia. During that event, Abbas called for an immediate ceasefire and urged Hamas to surrender all weapons to the PA.

“Hamas will have no role in governance, and it, along with other factions, must hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority,” Abbas stated. “We want one unified state, without arms outside the framework of the law, under one legal system, and with one legitimate security force.”

Abbas also reaffirmed his condemnation of the actions of the Israeli occupation, while simultaneously denouncing the killing and kidnapping of civilians, including the attacks carried out by Hamas on October 7, 2023.

The PA was established in 1994 following the Oslo Accords peace agreement with Israel, but it has been largely sidelined since 2005. It continues to operate in the West Bank, although it has faced ongoing clashes with Hamas, which has held de facto power in the Gaza Strip since 2007 after a violent power struggle.

Last month, the U.S. State Department indicated that the PA “must consistently repudiate terrorism — including the October 7 massacre” before it can be considered a partner for peace.

Despite the PA’s limited role in ceasefire negotiations, Abbas expressed gratitude on Monday to the U.S., Qatar, and Egypt for their mediation efforts with Israel. He asserted that the PA is the only legitimate authority capable of assuming full responsibility for governance and security in Gaza, proposing a temporary administrative committee linked to the Palestinian government in the West Bank, supported by Arab and international partners.

Abbas outlined a “comprehensive reform agenda” aimed at strengthening governance, transparency, and the rule of law in Gaza. His proposed plan includes reforming financial institutions, aligning school curricula with UNESCO standards, establishing a social welfare program, and holding presidential and parliamentary elections within one year of the conflict’s conclusion.

The State Department did not immediately respond to inquiries regarding its support for the re-implementation of the PA. The Trump administration has consistently made clear its opposition to the actions taken by other Western nations, which have recently indicated their intention to recognize a “state of Palestine.”

Source: Original article

Indian-American Anna Menon Selected for NASA’s 2025 Astronaut Class

Anna Menon has been selected for NASA’s 2025 astronaut class, marking a significant milestone in her already distinguished career in space exploration.

HOUSTON, TX — Anna Menon, who recently served as a mission specialist on SpaceX’s Polaris Dawn flight, has been chosen for NASA’s 2025 astronaut class. This selection highlights yet another milestone in a career filled with remarkable achievements.

Menon is known for her role in setting a new altitude record for women in space and participating in the first commercial spacewalk. She began her official astronaut training in September, further solidifying her status in the field of space exploration.

Adding a unique dimension to her story, Anna is married to fellow NASA astronaut Anil Menon. Together, they form one of the few couples in which both partners are active astronauts. The Menons are parents to two children, and Anil is slated to fly on the Soyuz MS-29 mission in June 2026 as part of Expedition 75.

Menon’s journey to space began at SpaceX, where she dedicated seven years as a senior engineer. In this role, she supported crew operations for the Dragon and Starship spacecraft and spent considerable time in mission control. She holds a bachelor’s degree in mathematics and Spanish from Texas Christian University, as well as a master’s degree in biomedical engineering from Duke University.

A native of Houston, Menon balances her professional commitments with community service. She volunteers with organizations such as the World Health Organization and Engineers Without Borders. In her leisure time, she enjoys hiking, scuba diving, and flying.

Her contributions to the Polaris Dawn mission have garnered her several accolades, including the World Record for Altitude: Women’s Record and the Dr. Buzz Aldrin Space Advancement Award. Additionally, she has received the Duke University Distinguished Young Alumni Award, multiple recognitions from SpaceX, and various NASA awards for her work at the Johnson Space Center.

Together, Anna and Anil Menon exemplify both a personal and professional partnership, pushing the boundaries of space exploration while nurturing a family on Earth.

Source: Original article

Ben Carson Sworn in as USDA National Advisor on Nutrition and Health

Former neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson has been sworn in as the national advisor for nutrition, health, and housing at the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Dr. Ben Carson, a prominent figure in American politics and a former neurosurgeon, was officially sworn in on Wednesday as the national advisor for nutrition, health, and housing with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

Carson previously served as the secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development during President Donald Trump’s first term. In his new role, he will provide guidance to both President Trump and USDA Secretary Rollins on critical issues related to nutrition, rural healthcare quality, and housing accessibility.

According to a USDA news release, Carson will act as the Department’s chief voice on these matters. He will collaborate closely with Secretary Rollins on initiatives under the President’s Make America Healthy Again Commission and work alongside leadership in USDA’s Rural Development Mission Area.

“Today, too many Americans are suffering from the effects of poor nutrition. Through common-sense policymaking, we have an opportunity to give our most vulnerable families the tools they need to flourish,” Carson stated in the release. He expressed his honor in working with Secretary Rollins on initiatives aimed at realizing President Trump’s vision for a healthier and stronger America.

Earlier this year, President Trump signed an executive order to establish a Religious Liberty Commission, appointing Carson as vice chair of the commission.

During a recent address at the American Cornerstone Institute’s Founders’ Dinner, Trump announced plans to award Carson the Presidential Medal of Freedom. A ceremony honoring Carson is expected to take place at the White House. Notably, Carson was previously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President George W. Bush in 2008.

Carson is also the founder of the American Cornerstone Institute, an organization dedicated to advocating for the principles he believes have shaped his life and contribute to the greatness of the nation: Faith, Liberty, Community, and Life.

As he embarks on this new role, Carson’s focus will be on addressing pressing issues related to nutrition and health, particularly in rural communities, while also enhancing housing accessibility for those in need.

His appointment comes at a time when the nation is increasingly aware of the challenges posed by inadequate nutrition and healthcare access, especially among vulnerable populations.

With a wealth of experience in both healthcare and public service, Carson is poised to make significant contributions to the USDA’s efforts in improving the quality of life for Americans across the country.

Source: Original article

Indian Americans Celebrate Professor Jagmohan Singh’s Efforts to Preserve Bhagat Singh’s Legacy

Over 80 Indian Americans gathered at MINT Restaurant to honor Professor Jagmohan Singh, nephew of revolutionary Bhagat Singh, celebrating his legacy and the ongoing impact of his ideals.

More than 80 distinguished Indian Americans convened at MINT Restaurant to pay tribute to Professor Jagmohan Singh, the nephew of the legendary freedom fighter Shaheed Bhagat Singh. Bhagat Singh is revered for his courageous challenge against British colonial rule in India and has inspired countless individuals in their quest for independence.

The event was hosted by Varinder Bhalla, Chairman and Founder of the Coalition of Indian American Associations of New York (CIONY), with support from the American Punjabi Society. This gathering served as a poignant reminder of Bhagat Singh’s enduring legacy and the values he championed.

The evening commenced with a short video that showcased Bhagat Singh’s life and contributions. Originally produced in 2010 by Dr. Riti Sunshine Bhalla during her high school years, the video was scripted and produced by Varinder Bhalla. It has since been broadcast across various channels in the United States and Europe, featuring appearances from U.S. Congress members, Senators, and Governors, which underscored its historical significance.

Harry Singh Bolla, an event sponsor from a village near Bhagat Singh’s ancestral home, delivered a heartfelt keynote address. He spoke about how Bhagat Singh’s legacy has profoundly influenced his own life, emphasizing the revolutionary’s impact on the Indian American community.

Professor Jagmohan Singh, the son of Bhagat Singh’s younger sister Bibi Amar Kaur, addressed the audience with a deeply personal account of his lifelong commitment to preserving his uncle’s ideals. He articulated how Bhagat Singh’s story continues to resonate with and inspire new generations.

During his speech, Professor Singh reflected on his encounters with several of Bhagat Singh’s close associates who fought for India’s freedom. He shared emotional memories of Bhagat Singh’s final days, including intimate conversations with his parents and the remarkable courage his uncle displayed as he faced execution.

In a poignant revelation, Professor Singh recounted his mother’s imprisonment for her active participation in the independence movement. He shared how, as a one-year-old, he spent a year in jail with her, illustrating the personal sacrifices made by his family in the struggle for freedom.

The event concluded with an engaging question-and-answer session led by Varinder Bhalla. Among the most touching moments was when Professor Singh described Bhagat Singh’s reflections during his final hours, including the ideological differences he had with his father, who had sought clemency for him. These insights left the audience feeling inspired and profoundly moved.

As the evening drew to a close, the attendees were reminded of the importance of preserving the legacy of Bhagat Singh and the ideals he stood for, ensuring that his contributions to the fight for independence continue to inspire future generations.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Community Responds to Recent Policy Changes in Newsroom

USCIS provides a comprehensive resource for news, data, and updates related to immigration and citizenship on its official website.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) offers a centralized platform for individuals seeking the latest information regarding immigration and citizenship. This resource is accessible through the USCIS News webpage, which features a variety of news releases and alerts organized by topic and date.

In addition to news updates, the USCIS News webpage includes important policy and procedure changes, as well as timely announcements about office closures and other emergencies that may affect the public.

For those interested in visual content, USCIS provides a Video and Image Gallery showcasing various aspects of its operations. This gallery serves as a valuable resource for understanding the agency’s work and its impact on communities across the nation.

Data enthusiasts can explore the Immigration and Citizenship Data page, which presents a wealth of statistics and information related to immigration trends and demographics. This data is essential for researchers, policymakers, and the general public who wish to gain insights into immigration patterns.

To stay connected, USCIS maintains a Social Media Directory that allows individuals to follow the agency on various platforms. This ensures that the public receives timely updates and information directly from USCIS through their preferred social media channels.

USCIS also shares recent speeches, statements, and congressional testimony from its leadership. These documents are searchable by topic and date, providing transparency and insight into the agency’s priorities and initiatives.

For those seeking specific information, the Electronic Reading Room offers access to documents identified under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Users can search for topics of interest using a convenient drop-down list, making it easier to find relevant information.

USCIS recognizes the importance of media communication and has established a network of agency representatives across the country to respond to media inquiries. This ensures that journalists and media outlets have access to accurate and timely information from the agency.

Lastly, USCIS keeps the public informed about upcoming events through its Upcoming Events section. This includes details on local engagements and national events, allowing individuals to participate in discussions and initiatives related to immigration and citizenship.

For more information and updates, visit the USCIS News webpage, where you can find a wealth of resources and stay informed about the latest developments in immigration and citizenship.

Source: Original article

India and U.S. Strengthen Bilateral Relations Through Strategic Diplomacy

India’s recent diplomatic meetings in the U.S. mark a significant step toward strengthening bilateral relations and addressing global challenges.

In a concerted effort to enhance bilateral relations, India conducted significant diplomatic meetings in the United States on September 22, 2025. These engagements reflect India’s proactive approach to addressing global challenges and reinforcing strategic partnerships.

Commerce and Industries Minister Piyush Goyal led discussions in Washington aimed at resuming and advancing trade negotiations. The primary objective was to translate political goodwill into tangible commercial outcomes. The discussions focused on achieving a mutually beneficial Trade Agreement (BTA) before the end of the year, addressing critical issues such as market access, supply-chain cooperation, and sectoral collaborations in technology, clean energy, and pharmaceuticals.

The U.S. Department of State issued a statement highlighting Secretary Marco Rubio’s appreciation for India’s continued engagement on various issues, including trade, defense, energy, and critical minerals. This acknowledgment underscores the strategic importance of the U.S.-India relationship.

Simultaneously, in New York, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar met with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio to discuss broader strategic issues. The meeting aimed to stabilize bilateral relations amidst trade frictions and new visa regulations. Both sides emphasized the importance of maintaining strong diplomatic ties and cooperation on global issues.

The twin meetings resulted in agreements to continue bilateral dialogues and deepen ties through diplomatic and commercial efforts. Working-level officials have been tasked with negotiating specific market-access and regulatory issues in the coming months. While immediate sweeping agreements were not achieved, the meetings opened avenues for more focused discussions and practical outcomes in areas of mutual benefit.

Source: Original article

DOJ Closes Investigation into BAPS Akshardham Temple Labor Allegations

The U.S. Department of Justice has closed its investigation into forced labor allegations at the BAPS Swaminarayan Akshardham temple in New Jersey, while a civil lawsuit continues in federal court.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has officially concluded its investigation into allegations of forced labor at the BAPS Swaminarayan Akshardham temple in Robbinsville, New Jersey. This temple is recognized as the largest Hindu temple in the Western Hemisphere. The investigation was launched following a raid in 2021, which was prompted by claims made by Indian workers who were brought to the United States on R-1 religious worker visas.

In May 2021, six workers filed a civil lawsuit, alleging they were coerced into performing strenuous construction tasks under poor working conditions. The lawsuit claimed that their passports were confiscated and that they were inadequately compensated for their labor. An amended complaint later introduced 15 additional plaintiffs; however, 12 of these individuals withdrew their claims, stating they had been misled by their legal counsel.

The leadership of the temple has consistently maintained that the workers were volunteers, referred to as “sevaks,” who regarded their participation as a form of spiritual service. They emphasized that the construction of the temple was a collective effort, involving over 12,500 individuals from diverse backgrounds and countries.

The DOJ’s decision to close the criminal investigation has been welcomed by officials at BAPS. They expressed relief and reaffirmed their commitment to transparency and community service. Lenin Joshi, a volunteer at the temple, described the community as “shaken” by the initial allegations but confident in the integrity of their efforts.

Despite the closure of the criminal investigation, the civil lawsuit remains active in federal court. Leaders at BAPS are optimistic about a favorable outcome, citing the DOJ’s findings as supportive of their position. The civil case is set to resume at an undetermined date, with both sides preparing for further proceedings.

Source: Original article

Democrats Criticize Trump’s Attacks on Free Speech, Target Vulnerable Republicans

Democrats have launched a digital ad campaign targeting House Republicans, accusing former President Donald Trump of undermining free speech following the suspension of comedian Jimmy Kimmel’s show.

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) initiated a new digital advertising campaign on Wednesday, highlighting what it describes as former President Donald Trump’s “ongoing attacks on free speech.” This campaign follows the recent suspension of comedian Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night television show, which has drawn significant attention and controversy.

The ads will focus on several House Republicans in swing districts who are facing tough re-election battles in the upcoming midterms. The campaign will be featured across various conservative and independent media platforms, including popular podcasts hosted by Joe Rogan and Ben Shapiro, which resonate strongly with younger and male audiences.

The DNC’s campaign comes in response to ABC’s decision to temporarily pull Kimmel’s show off the air after his comments regarding the alleged assassin of conservative activist Charlie Kirk sparked outrage and a veiled threat from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

The suspension of Kimmel has ignited backlash among Democrats, progressives, and even some prominent conservatives, who argue that the late-night host is being punished for exercising his right to free speech. Conversely, many Republicans contend that Kimmel’s remarks, which suggested that Kirk’s suspected killer was affiliated with the MAGA movement, were both outrageous and unfounded.

ABC reinstated Kimmel on Monday, and his program returned to the air on Tuesday night. However, approximately 60 affiliated stations owned by Nextar Media Group and Sinclair Broadcast Group opted to preempt the show.

The DNC asserted in a statement, “The American people don’t support attacks on free speech, which is why Trump is losing support among independent and conservative voters.” They emphasized that the Republican base is fracturing, with notable figures such as Megyn Kelly, Ted Cruz, and Ben Shapiro publicly distancing themselves from the former president’s administration.

The DNC’s advertisement features a clip of Trump from the early days of his second administration, where he declared, “On day one, I signed an executive order to stop all government censorship.” The ad’s narrator later claimed, “Trump wants to control what you see so he can control what you think.”

This campaign, which is backed by a modest budget in the five-figure range, will specifically target the congressional districts of Republican Representatives Rob Wittman and Jen Kiggans from Virginia, Brian Fitzpatrick from Pennsylvania, and Tom Kean Jr. from New Jersey.

The DNC stated, “It’s clear Donald Trump only cares about silencing his critics — and now, voters across the country and in Virginia, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey are going to hear about it.”

Trump and many of his allies, who have long positioned themselves as advocates for free speech, have criticized those who have spoken out against Kirk since the conservative activist’s assassination earlier this month. The former president welcomed ABC’s initial decision to suspend Kimmel and has suggested revoking the broadcast licenses of networks that he believes treat him unfairly.

DNC Chair Ken Martin expressed to Fox News, “Donald Trump’s administration has amassed a chilling record of restricting speech, extorting private companies, and dropping the full weight of the government censorship hammer on Americans simply exercising their First Amendment rights. This is no exaggeration, and it’s splintering the coalition that got Trump elected.” He further claimed that Trump is “attempting to silence people. It’s un-American, and Democrats won’t stand for it.”

During the administrations of Democratic Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, Republicans and conservatives frequently criticized what they perceived as efforts to suppress free speech, accusing Democrats of promoting “cancel culture.” In response to recent events, Trump and his allies have framed their actions as a shift from “cancel culture” to “consequence culture.”

Source: Original article

Trump Officials Criticize Governor for Ignoring Disruptive Anti-ICE Protests

The Department of Homeland Security has criticized Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker for his lack of response to an anti-ICE protest that escalated into chaos, prompting federal authorities to use tear gas.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has publicly criticized Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker for his inaction during a chaotic anti-ICE protest in Broadview, a suburb of Chicago. The protest forced federal authorities to deploy tear gas and other non-lethal measures to regain control of the situation.

In a statement released on Monday, DHS claimed that local police, operating under Pritzker’s sanctuary jurisdiction, “refused to answer multiple calls for assistance.” This assertion follows reports from Fox News Digital detailing clashes between federal officials and protesters who were obstructing ICE vehicles attempting to enter and exit a processing facility.

DHS characterized the protesters as “rioters,” stating that 16 individuals have been arrested in connection with the incident. The agency alleged that the rioters engaged in various violent actions, including obstructing law enforcement, throwing tear gas canisters, rocks, bottles, and fireworks, slashing the tires of vehicles, blocking facility entrances, and trespassing on private property. Additionally, it was reported that some rioters assaulted law enforcement officials during the unrest.

In response, Matt Hill, a spokesperson for Governor Pritzker, refuted the claims made by DHS. He told Fox News Digital that it is “completely false to suggest the state or local municipalities have been obstructing federal officials.” Hill emphasized that the state had not received multiple requests for assistance from the federal government and reminded DHS of the importance of coordinating with local law enforcement to ensure public safety.

“Governor Pritzker has been clear that violence is unacceptable and everyone needs to follow the law, which includes federal agents respecting constitutional rights to peaceful protest,” Hill added.

Hill also cautioned the media to approach reports from the Trump administration with skepticism, citing a “record of lies, lack of transparency, and failure to coordinate with the state and local law enforcement.”

The DHS statement highlighted that the protest disrupted an operation targeting individuals with serious criminal backgrounds. Among those being processed at the facility were individuals with convictions for drug trafficking, domestic abuse, driving under the influence (DUI), and assault.

One of the individuals mentioned by DHS was Andres Ventura-Uvaldo, a Mexican national with a history of felony DUI and domestic violence arrests. Another, Alberto Algeria Barron, had been previously removed from the U.S. in 2014 and had two convictions for domestic battery. Additionally, Erwin Jose Roa-Mustafa, a Dominican national, was being processed after pleading guilty to federal charges related to drug distribution, including fentanyl.

Other individuals included Ibis Alberto Testa Nunez, a Mexican national with prior arrests for cocaine possession, and Salvador Alcantar-Alcantar, who had been arrested for DUI, trespassing, and assault. Carlos Eduardo Chavez-Cardenas from Bolivia had a history of DUI and drug possession convictions.

DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin condemned the actions of the protesters, stating, “These heinous criminals, including domestic abusers, drug traffickers, violent offenders, and drunk drivers are some of the illegal aliens being held in the ICE Broadview Processing Center.” She further remarked that the rioters were “fighting to keep rapists, murderers, and other violent criminals loose on Illinois streets.” McLaughlin urged the public to recognize the efforts of ICE officers who work daily to enhance community safety.

This incident comes amid reports from DHS indicating that ICE officials are experiencing a more than 1,000 percent increase in assaults while conducting operations across Illinois.

According to Fox News Digital, the situation underscores the ongoing tensions between federal immigration enforcement and local jurisdictions that adopt sanctuary policies.

Source: Original article

EU Chief Calls for Gaza Reconstruction and Two-State Solution at UNGA

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the need for Gaza’s reconstruction and reaffirmed support for a two-state solution during her address at the 80th United Nations General Assembly.

New York, September 23 (ANI) — European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen addressed the 80th United Nations General Assembly, reiterating Europe’s commitment to a two-state solution while unveiling new initiatives aimed at supporting Palestine and rebuilding Gaza.

“We will set up a Palestine Donor Group. Because any future Palestinian State must be viable also from an economic point of view. And we Europeans will set up a dedicated instrument for Gaza’s reconstruction. Gaza must be rebuilt,” von der Leyen stated.

Highlighting Europe’s role in supporting the Palestinian Authority, she remarked, “When the night is darkest, we must hold fast to our compass, and our compass is the two-state solution. Since the beginning of this war, Europe has been the lifeline of the Palestinian Authority. But we must all do more, and this is why we will set up a Palestine donor group.”

Von der Leyen emphasized that the only realistic peace plan involves two states, ensuring a secure Israel alongside a viable Palestinian state, while also addressing the threat posed by Hamas.

In conjunction with these remarks, Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas issued a stern warning to Hamas and its factions, urging them to surrender their weapons to the Palestinian Authority. He asserted that the state of Palestine is the sole entity entitled to govern and ensure security in Gaza.

Speaking via video link during a special session on the two-state solution at the UN General Assembly, Abbas outlined a vision for a unified Palestinian state governed by a single law and legitimate security force.

“The state of Palestine is the only entity eligible to assume full responsibility for governance and security in Gaza. This comes through an interim administrative committee affiliated with the Palestinian government in the West Bank and Arab and international support and participation,” Abbas stated.

He emphasized that “Hamas will have no role in governing” and urged, “Hamas and other factions must surrender their weapons to the Palestinian Authority. What we want is one unified state without weapons, a state with one law and one legitimate security force.”

Linking his vision to recent diplomatic efforts, Abbas expressed gratitude for the New York Declaration adopted by the UN General Assembly in July. He described it as marking “the beginning of an irreversible path” toward ending the humanitarian crisis and Israeli occupation, in accordance with international legitimacy and the Arab Peace Initiative.

The declaration envisions an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital, living peacefully alongside Israel.

Abbas called for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, emphasizing the need for unhindered humanitarian access through the UN, the release of all hostages and prisoners, and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. He also advocated for urgent reconstruction efforts in Gaza and the West Bank through the Cairo International Conference.

“The declaration stressed that the war against our people must come to an immediate and durable end. It noted that the crimes emanating from the siege, the starvation, and destruction cannot be a means of achieving security. Therefore, we call for a permanent ceasefire,” he said.

“We need to ensure humanitarian access through the United Nations. We need to guarantee the release of all hostages and prisoners, with the withdrawal of the occupation forces from Gaza. We need a start without delay of Gaza and the West Bank reconstruction through the Cairo International Conference,” the president added.

Building on this, Abbas condemned the “occupation’s crimes,” including the siege, starvation, and destruction, as well as Hamas’s actions on October 7, 2023.

“We stress our condemnation of the occupation’s crimes. We also condemn the killing and detention of civilians, including Hamas’s actions on October the 7th, 2023,” he stated.

He further denounced Israeli policies, including settlement expansion, annexation, settler violence, and attacks on Islamic and Christian holy sites.

“We condemn the Israeli narrative on greater Israel, which flouts international law. It represents a direct threat to Arab national security and international peace,” he added.

The special session was co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia. During the session, French President Emmanuel Macron formally announced France’s recognition of the state of Palestine.

Source: Original article

SP Leader Azam Khan Expresses Gratitude After Release from Sitapur Jail

Azam Khan, a prominent leader of the Samajwadi Party, expressed gratitude to his supporters upon his release from Sitapur Jail after nearly two years behind bars.

Shahjahanpur (Uttar Pradesh) [India], September 23 (ANI) — Azam Khan, a prominent leader of the Samajwadi Party, walked out of Sitapur Jail on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, after spending nearly two years incarcerated.

As he emerged from the facility, Khan expressed heartfelt gratitude to his supporters, stating, “Thanks to everyone. My blessings to all who supported me.”

Khan’s imprisonment stemmed from his involvement in the Quality Bar land encroachment case. He was granted bail by the Allahabad High Court in May of this year, paving the way for his release.

In response to speculation regarding a potential alliance with the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), Khan clarified, “This can be explained only by those who are making the speculations. I did not meet anyone in jail. I was not allowed to make a phone call. So, I have been completely out of touch for five years.”

Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav welcomed Khan’s release, promising to withdraw all “false” cases against him if the party regains power in Uttar Pradesh.

Shivpal Singh Yadav, an SP MLA who was present to receive Khan, criticized the Yogi Adityanath government, alleging that Khan had been “framed” in false cases. He welcomed the court’s decision to grant bail, stating, “Azam Khan was framed by the government in false cases. However, the court has granted him bail and has provided relief to him in cases. I welcome this decision. I welcome the Supreme Court and the High Court. Many false cases were filed against him. The Samajwadi Party stands beside him.”

Earlier, the Allahabad High Court had granted bail to former Uttar Pradesh Minister Mohammad Azam Khan in the Quality Bar land case. Khan’s advocate, Mohammad Khalid, indicated that with this bail, there were no pending cases that would keep him in jail, suggesting that his release was imminent.

Khalid stated, “So, there’s no pending case that would keep him in jail. As of today, bail has been granted in all the cases. This process may take two to three days. As of now, there are no other pending cases.”

Source: Original article

US Strikes Drug-Smuggling Boat Carrying Over Ton of Cocaine

The Dominican Republic reported a major drug seizure after a U.S. airstrike targeted a vessel carrying over a ton of suspected cocaine.

The Dominican Republic has announced a significant drug seizure following a U.S. airstrike on a vessel suspected of trafficking narcotics. The boat was reportedly carrying “approximately 1,000 kilograms of suspected cocaine,” which translates to over 2,200 pounds, or more than one ton of the drug.

In the aftermath of the airstrike, the Dominican Republic’s National Drug Control Directorate and its navy seized hundreds of packages containing the suspected cocaine. These packages were subsequently sent, under chain of custody, to the National Institute of Forensic Sciences (INACIF) for analysis to determine their exact type and weight.

The operation was described as the first “joint operation against narcoterrorism in the Caribbean region” conducted between the Dominican Republic and the United States. According to a news release from the National Drug Control Directorate, authorities detected a speedboat, known as a “Go Fast” type, which intelligence reports indicated was loaded with narcotics and heading toward Dominican territory. The intention was to use the Dominican Republic as a transit point to transport the drugs to the United States.

This airstrike is part of a broader initiative by the U.S. government to combat drug trafficking. President Donald Trump has ordered strikes on multiple vessels this month as part of this crackdown. In a recent post on Truth Social, he emphasized the administration’s commitment to targeting drug traffickers, stating, “IF YOU ARE TRANSPORTING DRUGS THAT CAN KILL AMERICANS, WE ARE HUNTING YOU!”

The U.S. government has classified cocaine as “an intense, euphoria-producing stimulant drug with strong addictive potential.” A fact sheet from the government notes that tolerance to cocaine’s effects develops rapidly, leading users to consume higher doses.

This operation underscores the ongoing collaboration between the Dominican Republic and U.S. authorities in the fight against narcotics trafficking in the Caribbean region.

Source: Original article

California’s Gun Violence Restraining Orders: Seven Insights on Their Impact

California’s Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs) serve as a proactive model for preventing gun violence, emphasizing intervention over punishment and showing promising results in saving lives.

In the wake of a tragic mass shooting in New York that claimed the life of Didarul Islam, a Bangladeshi American NYPD officer, the debate over gun control has reignited across the nation. While New York mourns, California offers a proactive model for prevention through Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs). This article explores the key insights from California’s approach and how it could serve as a blueprint for other states.

Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs) in California are designed to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed a threat to themselves or others. According to Ari Freilich, Director of the California Department of Justice’s Office of Gun Violence Prevention, “GVROs aren’t about punishment. They’re about prevention.” This highlights that these orders are a civil tool aimed at restricting access to firearms without resorting to incarceration.

Family members, employers, educators, and law enforcement can request GVROs from a civil court in California. Once granted, the order prohibits the individual from purchasing or possessing firearms for a specific period, providing a critical intervention window. Freilich notes that California’s GVRO law has become a model for 19 other states and Washington, D.C., underscoring its potential as a proactive safety measure.

GVROs also address a significant gap between the mental health and criminal justice systems. Psychiatrist Dr. Amy Barnhorst emphasizes that these orders can be utilized in situations where someone is clearly disturbed or making threats but does not meet the threshold for psychiatric hospitalization or arrest. This allows for the removal of firearms from potentially dangerous situations while addressing underlying issues.

One of the most compelling aspects of GVROs is their effectiveness in preventing suicides. Dr. Barnhorst states that removing firearms significantly increases the chances of survival in potential suicide cases. “For every 17 GVROs requested in cases of suicide concern, one life is saved,” she notes, highlighting the profound impact of this intervention.

The use of GVROs in California has surged by over 500 percent in five years, increasing from 424 orders filed in 2018 to 2,073 in 2023. During the same period, firearm-related homicides and suicides have declined in the state. Chris Dargan points out, “Even with strong gun safety laws, over 3,000 Californians die from gun violence each year,” emphasizing the need for continued awareness and utilization of protective orders.

Law enforcement officials also recognize the practical application of GVROs in preventing potential tragedies. Sergeant Kyle Ikeuchi of the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office highlights their use in cases where individuals have threatened workplace violence or school shootings. “It’s a tool that allows us to act before tragedy strikes,” he states, stressing the importance of community vigilance in reporting potential threats.

Community awareness plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of GVROs. Gabriella Gonzalez, a member of the Reduce the Risk Youth Advisory Council, shared her personal experience of being stalked and threatened by an armed individual. Her story underscores the critical need for outreach and education, emphasizing that awareness of protection orders can empower individuals to seek justice and protect themselves.

California’s comprehensive approach, which combines legal tools, education, and community engagement, offers a potential blueprint for other states grappling with gun violence. The increasing use of GVROs and the corresponding decline in gun-related deaths suggest a correlation between proactive interventions and improved public safety.

Source: Original article

Charlie Kirk Honored at Memorial Attended by 90,000 People

Charlie Kirk’s memorial service in Arizona drew approximately 90,000 attendees, marking it as one of the largest tributes for a private citizen in recent history.

On Sunday, a remarkable gathering took place in Glendale, Arizona, as roughly 90,000 people came together to honor Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA). This memorial service stands out as one of the largest public turnouts for a private citizen in recent memory.

According to estimates from TPUSA, around 70,000 attendees filled the State Farm Stadium to capacity, while an additional 10,000 people gathered at the nearby Desert Diamond Arena, designated as an overflow venue. Another 10,000 individuals watched the service from nearby viewing areas, underscoring the extraordinary scale of the event.

While earlier estimates from law enforcement officials suggested attendance could reach around 200,000, the final count still highlighted the significant public interest in Kirk’s life and legacy.

The memorial service featured a lineup of political heavyweights, conservative media figures, and religious leaders, making it one of the largest public gatherings ever organized for a private citizen. The event was broadcast across every major U.S. television network, as noted by White House Communications Director Steven Cheung.

Kirk’s memorial also showcased the unique intersection of politics, media, and faith that characterized his public persona. Such large-scale memorials are not unprecedented, as history has seen similar outpourings for cultural icons. For instance, the death of Elvis Presley in 1977 attracted an estimated 80,000 people to the streets of Memphis for his funeral procession, although only a few hundred were allowed inside the venue.

In June 2016, approximately 14,000 people attended the memorial service for legendary heavyweight boxing champion Muhammad Ali in Louisville, Kentucky, with thousands more tuning in via live streams. Additionally, the passing of Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968 was marked by two massive services in Atlanta, where an estimated 150,000 people gathered to witness his funeral procession.

Charlie Kirk was tragically assassinated on September 10 during an outdoor event at Utah Valley University, which was the inaugural stop on TPUSA’s planned American Comeback Tour. Known for his engaging debates on college campuses, Kirk was in the midst of fielding open-mic questions from a crowd of thousands when a single shot ended his life.

The profound impact of Kirk’s life and work was evident in the overwhelming turnout at his memorial, reflecting the deep connection he fostered with his supporters and the broader community.

Source: Original article

Kash Patel Expresses Pride in Leading FBI After Heated Hearing

FBI Director Kash Patel faced intense scrutiny during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing but remained defiant, asserting his pride in leading the agency and its historic recruitment efforts.

FBI Director Kash Patel faced significant criticism from Democratic senators during a recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, yet he remained resolute, stating that he is “proud” to lead the nation’s foremost investigative agency. Following the hearing, Patel emphasized the FBI’s record recruitment efforts, claiming that the agency has received the highest number of applications for FBI agents and intelligence analysts in its history.

One of the primary points of contention during the hearing was Patel’s earlier social media post, in which he mistakenly stated that the alleged killer of conservative leader Charlie Kirk was in custody. While Patel acknowledged that he could have phrased his post more carefully, he maintained that he does not regret it, asserting that it was made in the spirit of transparency.

In his remarks after the hearing, Patel noted, “The American people are seeing and hearing what the FBI is doing on a daily basis, crushing violent crime and defending the homeland.” He expressed pride in leading an agency that has experienced unprecedented growth in its application pool, stating, “I’m proud to be the director of the FBI that has seen the most significant, expansive application pool in history.”

During his opening statement to the committee, Patel highlighted several accomplishments of the FBI since President Donald Trump took office, including tens of thousands of arrests, a reorganization of the agency, and a renewed focus on combating illicit drugs. Despite the mounting criticism regarding his leadership, Patel challenged lawmakers to confront him directly, declaring, “I’m not going anywhere,” and inviting them to critique his 16 years of service.

Patel also faced scrutiny over a series of firings at the FBI, which some have alleged were politically motivated. Ranking member Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., criticized Patel for his perceived loyalty to Trump, claiming that the director has appointed “MAGA loyalists” to key positions and instituted internal “loyalty tests,” including polygraph examinations. Durbin further alleged that some FBI officials who failed these tests required waivers to remain employed at the bureau.

Additionally, Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, questioned Patel about a requirement for FBI field agents to perform push-ups as part of their physical fitness standards. Hirono expressed concern that this requirement could disproportionately affect female agents, asking, “There are concerns about whether or not being able to do these kinds of harsh pull-ups is really required of FBI agents.” In response, Patel asserted, “If you want to chase down a bad guy, excuse me, and put him in handcuffs, you had better be able to do a pull-up.”

In a particularly heated exchange, Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., warned Patel, “I think you’re not going to be around long,” suggesting that this might be his last oversight hearing. Booker criticized Patel for his allegiance to Trump rather than the Constitution, stating, “Donald Trump has shown us in his first term, and in this term, he is not loyal to people like you.” Patel countered Booker’s remarks, asserting that the senator’s “rant of false information does not bring this country together,” and added, “It’s my time, not yours.”

As the hearing concluded, Patel’s defiance and commitment to the FBI’s mission were clear, even in the face of mounting criticism from lawmakers. His tenure as director continues to be marked by controversy, but he remains steadfast in his role and the agency’s objectives.

Source: Original article

Nayna Gupta Discusses Deportation’s Impact on Families at Shadow Hearing

Nayna Gupta, Policy Director of the American Immigration Council, testified at a Shadow Hearing on September 18, 2025, addressing the severe impacts of deportation on families and communities.

On September 18, 2025, Nayna Gupta, the Policy Director of the American Immigration Council, provided crucial testimony at a Shadow Hearing organized by U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal, who serves as the Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Immigration, Integrity, Security, and Enforcement.

The hearing, titled “Kidnapped and Disappeared: Trump’s Assault Destroys U.S. Families and Communities,” marks the third installment in Rep. Jayapal’s series focused on the profound human costs associated with deportation policies.

During her testimony, Gupta emphasized the multifaceted consequences of these policies, which she argued have far-reaching effects on both individuals and society as a whole.

One of the key points Gupta raised was the way deportation policies tear apart families and destabilize communities. She illustrated how these actions not only affect the individuals being deported but also have a ripple effect on their loved ones and the broader community.

Gupta also pointed out that such policies undermine due process and fairness within the U.S. immigration system. She argued that the current framework often lacks the necessary protections for individuals, leading to unjust outcomes.

Furthermore, Gupta highlighted that these deportation practices weaken the core values of justice and dignity that should define America. She called for a reevaluation of the immigration system to better align with these fundamental principles.

The American Immigration Council remains committed to advocating for an immigration system that prioritizes family unity, upholds due process, and reflects the ideals of justice and dignity.

As the conversation around immigration continues to evolve, Gupta’s testimony serves as a poignant reminder of the human impact behind policy decisions.

According to the American Immigration Council, the ongoing discourse is essential for fostering a more humane and just immigration system.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Emphasizes Patriotic Education in Federal Grant Programs

The Trump administration has introduced a new federal education grant priority focused on promoting “patriotic education” in American schools, emphasizing a positive portrayal of the nation’s history.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Trump administration has unveiled a new supplemental priority for federal education grants, aimed at fostering what it describes as “patriotic education” in American schools. This proposal, announced on September 17, represents the fifth such priority under the guidance of U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon and will shape future discretionary grant awards by the U.S. Department of Education.

In an official statement, the department indicated that this new priority will be utilized in grant competitions to encourage a “civic education that teaches American history, values, and geography with an unbiased approach.” Secretary McMahon emphasized the importance of an education system that conveys America’s founding principles, political institutions, and rich history honestly, stating, “It is imperative to promote an education system that teaches future generations honestly about America’s Founding principles, political institutions, and rich history… to inspire an informed patriotism and love of country.”

According to the department, “patriotic education” aims to present American history in a manner that is “accurate, honest, and inspiring.” The initiative will focus on an “uplifting portrayal” of the nation’s founding ideals while also acknowledging the progress made through the efforts of civil rights heroes who fought to extend the protections of the U.S. Constitution to all citizens.

This initiative is particularly timely as the nation approaches the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence in 2026. The proposed priority has been published in the Federal Register and is currently open for public comment for 30 days before it is finalized. Following this period, the Education Department plans to incorporate the feedback into its grantmaking decisions related to civic and history education.

The emphasis on patriotic education has garnered attention, reflecting a broader trend in educational policy that seeks to instill a sense of national pride and historical awareness among students. The administration’s approach has sparked discussions about the role of education in shaping civic identity and the narratives presented in American history.

As the public comment period progresses, stakeholders in education, including teachers, parents, and policymakers, will have the opportunity to voice their opinions on the proposed priority. The outcome of this initiative could significantly influence the direction of educational content and funding in the years to come.

According to ANI, the Education Department aims to create a framework that not only celebrates American achievements but also addresses the complexities of the nation’s history.

Source: Original article

Lawmakers Address Hateful Political Rhetoric After Kirk Assassination

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, lawmakers are grappling with the influence of political rhetoric and gun violence on the rising tide of political violence in the United States.

The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has ignited a contentious debate among lawmakers regarding the role of political rhetoric in the increasing incidents of political violence. While both Republicans and Democrats have condemned violence, they diverge on the extent to which inflammatory language contributes to the current crisis.

Some Republican lawmakers have pointed fingers at what they describe as a “culture of assassination” fostered by the left’s rhetoric. Conversely, Democrats have accused Republicans of undermining free speech in their responses to political violence. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., emphasized the need to focus on gun control rather than rhetoric as a primary factor in the rise of political violence. “This isn’t just about what happened to Charlie Kirk,” she stated. “At the same time his tragic killing was happening, three kids were getting shot in school, and that was one or two weeks after another couple of kids were getting shot, in church, at mass, at a Catholic school.”

In stark contrast, GOP Representative Nancy Mace, R-S.C., did not hold back in her criticism of those who she believes incite hatred toward conservatives. “We need to shame these people out of polite society, shame them out of existence. They need to be fired from their jobs. They are putting lives in danger,” Mace asserted. “They are denying that they’re celebrating the political assassination and murder of Charlie Kirk, but they’re liars. They’re lying through their teeth.”

Lawmakers from both parties have called for a reduction in heated rhetoric following Kirk’s assassination. Many Americans, including K-12 education officials, college professors, healthcare professionals, political commentators, and writers, have faced backlash for their reactions to Kirk’s death. This includes professionals from various sectors and major companies, such as Perkins Coie, the law firm associated with the New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ, and Office Depot.

Representative Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., underscored the importance of free speech, warning that America’s democratic tradition could be jeopardized if open discourse is stifled. “Look, there’s a limit to what Congress can do, because we have the First Amendment, which protects all forms of speech, including hate speech,” Torres explained. “But we should have a culture of condemning any rhetoric that glorifies violence. I see violence as the downfall of American democracy. We all should have the right to speak freely, to think freely, without fear of harassment or intimidation or violence. And once we lose the ability to speak freely in the public square, then democracy as we know it has come to an end.”

Representative Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., proposed potential measures Congress could explore to mitigate inflammatory rhetoric and its possible effects on violence. “You have to look at the role that social media companies play in allowing violent rhetoric to be on their sites,” Swalwell noted. “And what more can we do so that law enforcement can see these attacks sooner? I wait, and stand ready to learn, where there are signs that were missed by law enforcement. Because if that’s the case, we have to do better, because the temperature is only increasing.”

As the nation grapples with the implications of Kirk’s assassination, the discussion surrounding political rhetoric and its consequences remains a pressing concern for lawmakers and citizens alike.

Source: Original article

Weight Loss Drugs May Extend Lifespan for Americans, Researchers Say

New research suggests that GLP-1 weight loss drugs could significantly reduce mortality rates in the U.S. by 2045, addressing obesity’s role in leading causes of death.

A recent study indicates that GLP-1 drugs, commonly used for diabetes and weight loss, could lead to a notable decrease in mortality rates among Americans. Researchers from Swiss Re, a reinsurance company based in Zurich, Switzerland, project that these medications could result in a 6.4% reduction in all-cause mortality in the United States by the year 2045. In comparison, the United Kingdom is expected to see a reduction of over 5% in mortality rates over the same period.

Both the U.S. and the U.K. are grappling with high obesity rates and have seen a “strong uptake” of GLP-1 drugs, according to the researchers’ findings. The United States has the highest obesity rate in the world, with more than 40% of adults classified as obese. In the U.K., approximately 30% of adults fall into the same category.

Obesity is a significant factor contributing to the stagnation of life expectancy, as it is linked to 70% of the leading causes of death in high-income countries. These causes include heart disease, stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, and various forms of cancer. The researchers noted that by improving baseline risk factors, GLP-1 drugs could lead to long-term reductions in mortality, potentially saving millions from premature death.

To maximize the benefits of GLP-1 medications, experts emphasize the importance of implementing lifestyle changes that promote long-term health improvements. Without sustainable changes such as diet and exercise, individuals may experience weight regain and rebound effects, as supported by various studies.

Paul Murray, the CEO of Life & Health Reinsurance at Swiss Re, highlighted the potential of GLP-1 drugs to combat the obesity epidemic. In a press release, he stated, “Our research underscores that the full benefit will come from going beyond medication.” He added that insurers have a unique opportunity to foster partnerships, support policy initiatives, and encourage individuals to make meaningful lifestyle changes focused on prevention.

Murray further noted, “If we get this right, we can strengthen the insurance safety net and contribute to people living longer, healthier lives.”

Recent findings also indicate that GLP-1 medications can improve a range of health conditions beyond weight loss and diabetes. These include issues related to heart health, kidney function, liver conditions, skin disorders, arthritis, cognitive decline, addiction, and even certain cancers.

Dr. Sue Decotiis, a triple board-certified weight loss physician based in New York, confirmed in an interview that patients have reported improvements in various health conditions while using these medications. She explained that fat cells, which are reduced through the action of GLP-1 drugs, produce cytokines that can lead to inflammation in the body. This inflammation is associated with autoimmune diseases, cancer, and other health issues.

“By reducing the volume of fat cells in the body, we reduce all these inflammatory cytokines,” Dr. Decotiis stated. “And that’s why we see a lot of the effects that we see.” She emphasized the importance of using these medications responsibly, treating both the drugs and the body with respect. “This is a wonderful tool if it’s used the right way,” she added.

As the research unfolds, the potential of GLP-1 drugs to enhance public health and extend life expectancy appears promising, provided that individuals also commit to healthier lifestyles.

Source: Original article

Trump References Churchill Amid Growing Concerns Over UK Free Speech

President Donald Trump praised the U.S.-U.K. “special relationship” during a state dinner with King Charles III, addressing ongoing concerns about free speech in the U.K.

During a state dinner at Windsor Castle on Wednesday night, President Donald Trump highlighted the enduring “special relationship” between the United States and the United Kingdom. His remarks came amid ongoing debates regarding free speech in the U.K.

In his toast, Trump referenced the historical bond that inspired Sir Winston Churchill, stating, “His Majesty spoke eloquently about the bond which inspired Sir Winston Churchill – the bust is in the Oval Office right now – the beautiful bust of Winston Churchill, to coin the phrase ‘special relationship,’ but seen from American eyes, the word ‘special’ does not begin to do it justice.” He emphasized the connections shared by the two nations, describing them as “joined by history and fate, by love and language and by transcendent ties of culture, tradition, ancestry and destiny.”

Trump’s remarks came during an unprecedented second state visit, which included King Charles and other members of the royal family, as well as First Lady Melania Trump. Traditionally, royal events tend to avoid partisan issues, with the royal family maintaining a neutral stance on contentious topics. However, Trump has previously deviated from this norm.

While his toast appeared to remain politically neutral, it touched on a sensitive issue that has sparked controversy in both the U.S. and the U.K. in recent months: free speech. “The British Empire laid the foundations of law, liberty, free speech and individual rights virtually everywhere the Union Jack has ever flown, including a place called America,” Trump stated. This comment could raise eyebrows, particularly as the U.K. government faces criticism regarding its approach to free speech.

In recent months, U.K. online safety laws have become a contentious topic, drawing heated political debate not only within Britain but also among American leaders. Vice President JD Vance, who was not present at the state dinner, has been vocal about these issues. Critics, including right-wing Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, have described the U.K.’s approach to free speech as an “authoritarian” crackdown, comparing it to laws seen in countries like North Korea.

As discussions surrounding free speech continue to evolve, Trump’s remarks at Windsor Castle underscore the complexities of the U.S.-U.K. relationship and the shared values that both nations hold dear.

Source: Original article

Squad Member Responds to Claims of Democratic Celebration of Political Violence

Rep. Ilhan Omar denied that Democratic voters are celebrating the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, despite evidence of backlash against those who have mocked his death.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota and member of the progressive group known as “the Squad,” has refuted claims that Democratic voters are celebrating the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. In a recent interview, Omar was confronted with questions regarding the rhetoric surrounding Kirk’s death and whether she believed there was a celebration of political violence among Democratic constituents.

In video footage obtained by Fox News Digital, Omar was asked directly about her concerns regarding the Democratic base’s response to Kirk’s assassination. When pressed on whether Democratic voters were celebrating political violence, Omar responded, “I don’t think anybody is.” This assertion comes despite a growing number of professionals across various sectors facing repercussions for mocking or praising Kirk’s death.

Professionals from K-12 education officials to healthcare workers and political commentators have experienced backlash for their comments regarding Kirk’s assassination. Notably, the law firm Perkins Coie, which is associated with major entities like the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ, has also been implicated in this controversy.

Following Kirk’s assassination, lawmakers from both parties have condemned the rise of political violence. However, contentious moments have still surfaced in Congress. On the day of Kirk’s death, a moment of silence in the House Chamber turned chaotic when Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert of South Carolina requested a spoken prayer in addition to the silent tribute. This request was met with protests from Democratic members, some of whom reportedly shouted about the lack of attention given to a school shooting that occurred on the same day as Kirk’s assassination. In response, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican from Florida, shouted back, “You all caused this.”

When Omar was asked why Democrats did not offer a prayer for Kirk, she stated, “We did a moment of silence; nobody prays on the House floor for anybody who has passed away.” Her comments reflect a broader tension within Congress regarding how to address the implications of political violence.

Omar is currently facing efforts from Republican lawmakers to strip her of her committee assignments, stemming from her comments about Kirk shortly after his assassination. In an interview with the progressive news outlet Zeteo, Omar criticized Kirk’s legacy, stating that he had previously “downplayed slavery and what Black people have gone through in this country by saying Juneteenth shouldn’t exist.”

Omar further elaborated on her views, asserting that many who claim Kirk wanted to engage in civil debate are ignoring the documented history of his words and actions over the past decade. “There are a lot of people who are out there talking about him just wanting to have a civil debate,” she said. “There is nothing more effed up, you know, than to completely pretend that, you know, his words and actions have not been recorded and in existence for the last decade or so.”

In her remarks, Omar also took aim at GOP figures who have criticized Democrats for their rhetoric following Kirk’s assassination. “These people are full of s—,” she stated. “And it’s important for us to call them out while we feel anger and sadness, and have, you know, empathy, which Charlie said, ‘No, it shouldn’t exist,’ because that’s a newly created word or something,” referring to Kirk’s comments about “hate speech.”

The ongoing debate surrounding Kirk’s assassination and the subsequent reactions from both sides of the political spectrum highlight the increasingly polarized nature of American politics. As discussions continue, the implications of political violence remain a pressing concern for lawmakers and citizens alike.

Source: Original article

Trump Travels to UK for Second State Visit, Then to Arizona

President Donald Trump is set for a rare second state visit to the UK, followed by a trip to Arizona for the funeral of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

President Donald Trump will embark on a state visit to the United Kingdom this week, marking only his second such visit during his presidency. Following his time in the UK, Trump will travel to Arizona to attend the funeral of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

This return to England is notable, as U.S. presidents typically make only one state visit during their time in office. The significance of this occasion is underscored by both its political and symbolic weight.

During the visit, Trump and First Lady Melania Trump will be hosted by King Charles III and Queen Camilla at Windsor Castle, as Buckingham Palace is currently undergoing renovations. The couple will also meet with Prince William and Princess Catherine of Wales during their stay.

The state visit will begin with a formal welcome, followed by a series of ceremonial events that include a carriage procession, a gun salute, and a military flyover. The festivities will culminate in a lavish state dinner, which typically invites around 150 guests who are chosen based on their cultural, diplomatic, or economic ties to the host nation.

Darren McGrady, a former personal chef to the late Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Diana, emphasized the importance of getting the menu right for such an occasion. McGrady, who served as a royal chef for 15 years and cooked for five U.S. presidents, noted that there is no room for error when it comes to the culinary offerings at a state dinner.

On Thursday, Trump will travel to Chequers, the official country residence of the UK prime minister, where he will meet with Prime Minister Keir Starmer. This meeting will include a series of bilateral discussions, followed by a joint news conference later that day.

Trump, who is 79 years old, and King Charles, aged 76, have known each other for decades, with their relationship dating back to Charles’s visit to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in the late 1980s. More recently, King Charles sent Trump a personal note after Trump survived an assassination attempt during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

After concluding his UK visit, Trump will head to Arizona to attend the funeral of Charlie Kirk, who was tragically assassinated during an outdoor debate at Utah Valley University. Kirk, the charismatic founder of Turning Point USA, was shot on Wednesday, prompting an outpouring of grief and support from his followers.

In the wake of her husband’s death, Kirk’s widow, Erika, expressed her determination to carry on his mission. “To everyone listening tonight across America, the movement my husband built will not die,” she stated in a video message. “I refuse to let that happen. No one will ever forget my husband’s name. And I will make sure of it. It will become stronger. Bolder. Louder and greater than ever,” she affirmed.

Andrew Kolvet, executive producer of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” shared on social media that Turning Point USA has received over 32,000 inquiries from individuals interested in starting new campus chapters in the wake of Kirk’s assassination. In a separate post, Kolvet remarked, “This is the Turning Point.”

Trump’s dual engagements this week highlight significant moments in both international relations and domestic political discourse, reflecting the ongoing impact of influential figures in American conservatism.

Source: Original article

More Children Worldwide Now Obese Than Underweight, WHO Reports

For the first time in history, more children globally are classified as obese than underweight, according to a new UNICEF report highlighting a concerning trend in childhood nutrition.

Global childhood obesity rates have tripled between 2000 and 2022, driven largely by the prevalence of ultra-processed foods and aggressive junk food marketing, according to a recent analysis by UNICEF. This alarming trend has emerged in over 190 countries, marking a significant shift in the nutritional landscape for children.

For the first time ever, the number of children classified as obese has surpassed those who are underweight. UNICEF’s findings indicate that approximately one in ten school-aged children—around 188 million worldwide—meets the World Health Organization’s criteria for obesity. Additionally, one in five children under the age of 19, or about 391 million, is considered overweight. The distinction between overweight and obesity is critical, as obesity represents a more severe condition that significantly increases the risk of serious health issues later in life.

Between 2000 and 2022, the global obesity rate among children aged five to 19 surged from 3% to 9.4%. During the same period, the prevalence of underweight children declined from nearly 13% to 9.2%. “When we talk about malnutrition, we are no longer just talking about underweight children,” stated UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell in a press release. She emphasized that the rise of ultra-processed foods is replacing essential nutrients found in fruits, vegetables, and proteins, which are vital for children’s growth, cognitive development, and mental health.

While undernutrition remains a significant issue in many parts of the world, obesity has become increasingly common, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The report identifies obesity hotspots, revealing that rates have doubled since the 2000s, even in regions still grappling with undernutrition. In small Pacific Island nations like Niue and the Cook Islands, nearly 40% of young people are classified as obese.

In wealthier nations, the consumption of ultra-processed foods has reached alarming levels, with these foods accounting for more than half of adolescents’ caloric intake. In Chile, for instance, 27% of children aged five to 19 are living with obesity, while the rates in the United States and the United Arab Emirates stand at 21%.

In response to this growing crisis, health professionals in affluent countries like the U.S. are increasingly advocating for the use of new weight-loss medications for teenagers. “Obesity is not a failure of parents or children. It’s the result of toxic food environments,” remarked Chris Van Tulleken, a professor and UNICEF supporter, in an interview with Reuters.

The report highlights the serious health risks associated with obesity, including a higher likelihood of developing insulin resistance, high blood pressure, Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain types of cancer. Experts attribute the rise in obesity not only to the consumption of ultra-processed foods high in salt, sugar, and fat but also to the pervasive marketing of junk food.

A survey conducted by UNICEF involving 64,000 young people across 170 countries revealed that 75% had encountered advertisements for sugary drinks, snacks, or fast food in the previous week. Alarmingly, even in conflict zones, 68% of respondents reported exposure to such advertising. In low-income countries, 65% of young people were similarly exposed, often through schools, social media, sporting events, and children’s programming.

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. recently released the “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) report, which underscores the role of ultra-processed foods, sedentary lifestyles, and various environmental and dietary factors in the rising rates of obesity and chronic disease among American children. The report indicates that the administration will consider developing guidelines to limit the direct marketing of unhealthy foods to children.

UNICEF is calling on governments worldwide to take immediate action by imposing restrictions on junk food marketing and banning unhealthy products in schools. In Mexico, where childhood obesity is prevalent and sugary drinks and ultra-processed foods constitute 40% of children’s daily caloric intake, the government has already enacted a ban on the sale and distribution of these products in public schools.

The agency warns that without swift and decisive action, the ongoing trend of rising childhood obesity threatens to lead to a surge in diabetes, heart disease, and other serious health problems for future generations.

Source: Original article

Complete Mastodon Jaw Discovered in New York Homeowner’s Backyard

A complete mastodon jaw discovered in a New York backyard will undergo scientific analysis before being displayed to the public in 2025.

A remarkable discovery has been made in Scotchtown, New York, where a homeowner unearthed a complete mastodon jaw in their backyard. This extinct mammal, closely related to modern elephants, was excavated by researchers from the New York State Museum and SUNY Orange.

The jaw, along with several bone fragments, was found after the homeowner noticed two unusual teeth hidden among plant fronds. Intrigued, they dug deeper and uncovered two additional teeth just inches below the surface. The New York State Museum stated that the fossils will undergo carbon dating and extensive scientific analysis to determine the mastodon’s age, diet, and habitat.

Once preserved and studied, the jaw and related findings are set to be showcased in public programming in 2025, providing visitors with a glimpse into New York’s rich Ice Age history. The museum emphasized the significance of this discovery, noting that it is the first of its kind in New York in 11 years and is being referred to as a “prehistoric treasure.”

The Albany-based museum reported that excavation efforts revealed a full, well-preserved mastodon jaw belonging to an adult individual. In addition to the jaw, researchers recovered a piece of a toe bone and a rib fragment, which offer valuable insights into the mastodon’s life and environment.

According to museum officials, approximately 150 mastodon fossils have been found throughout New York, with a third of those discoveries originating from Orange County, where this jaw was located. Cory Harris, Chair of SUNY Orange’s Behavioral Sciences Department, remarked, “While the jaw is the star of the show, the additional toe and rib fragments offer valuable context and the potential for additional research.” He also expressed hope for further exploration of the immediate area to uncover more preserved bones.

This discovery not only highlights the rich prehistoric history of the region but also underscores the importance of citizen engagement in scientific research. The homeowner, who recognized the significance of their find, expressed their excitement, stating, “When I found the teeth and examined them in my hands, I knew they were something special and decided to call in the experts. I’m thrilled that our property has yielded such an important find for the scientific community.”

As the scientific community prepares to analyze the mastodon jaw, it promises to contribute significantly to our understanding of these ancient creatures and their environments.

Source: Original article

Montana GOP Representative Ryan Zinke Calls Charlie Kirk Assassination ‘Watershed Moment’

Montana Congressman Ryan Zinke described the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk as a “watershed moment,” emphasizing the need for civil political discourse without violence.

Rep. Ryan Zinke, a Republican from Montana, characterized the recent assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk as a “watershed moment.” He underscored the importance of maintaining civil political discourse, asserting that Americans should be able to engage in political disagreements without resorting to violence.

Zinke made these remarks during an appearance on NewsNation’s program “The Hill” on Friday. He referenced earlier comments made by Utah Governor Spencer Cox, expressing disappointment that differing political viewpoints have led to violent confrontations.

“We should look and reflect,” Zinke stated. “As the governor pointed out, this is a watershed moment. So, the watershed moment depends on what this country does.” He posed a critical question: “Are we going to continue this? Are we going to continue to not be able to have dialogue and talk to your neighbor?”

Kirk, who was 31 years old and co-founder of Turning Point USA, was shot on the campus of Utah Valley University on Wednesday afternoon. He was transported to a hospital in critical condition but was later pronounced dead. The alleged shooter, identified as 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, turned himself in after a multi-day manhunt, reportedly encouraged by his family.

During a news conference on Friday, Governor Cox called for civility and urged individuals on both sides of the political spectrum to de-escalate tensions and “choose a different path.” He stated, “This is our moment: Do we escalate, or do we find an off-ramp? It’s a choice.”

In an emotional reflection, Cox shared, “For the last 48 hours, I have been as angry as I have ever been, as sad as I have ever been … and as anger pushed me to the brink, it was actually Charlie’s words that pushed me back. Charlie said, ‘When people stop talking, that’s when you get violence.'” This sentiment resonated with Zinke, who similarly called for political dialogue devoid of violence.

Zinke expressed concern over disheartening statements he has observed on social media following recent incidents of political violence. He remarked, “You see, you know, an assassination attempt. You see a political assassination in Minnesota. You see one with Charlie Kirk. You know a father. You know a great patriot, a loving husband. You know, assassinated. And ironically, his assassination was over his message, which was, ‘Let’s have a dialogue. Let’s talk.'”

He further emphasized, “In our country, the strength is that we may agree or disagree, but disagreement should never result in violence.” Zinke also referenced a June incident in which Vance Boelter was charged with the murders of former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman, her husband Mark, and their dog at their Minneapolis home. Boelter was also charged with shooting Minnesota state Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, and for attempting to shoot their daughter, Hope.

Other recent acts of political violence include assassination attempts against former President Donald Trump and the attack on Paul Pelosi, the husband of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, with a hammer in 2022.

Zinke’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding his statements.

Source: Original article

Two Shootings Raise Concerns Among Indian-American Communities

Recent events in the U.S., including a mass shooting and ongoing tariff disputes with India, highlight complex issues of ideology and international relations.

Chicago: As the Indian media focused on U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs and his aide Peter Navarro’s critical remarks about India and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a tragic mass shooting unfolded in the United States.

While the two events may seem unrelated at first glance, they share a common thread of anti-India sentiment. Observers note that the ideologies of transgederism, antisemitism, jihadism, and anti-India bigotry are interconnected in troubling ways.

The Annunciation Catholic Church Shooting

On Wednesday, August 27, 2025, the new school year began at The Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Just before 8:30 a.m., as children gathered at the church for Mass, a shooting erupted. The school serves students from preschool through eighth grade and is affiliated with the historic Annunciation Catholic Church.

The shooter, identified by law enforcement as 23-year-old Robin (born Robert) Westman, opened fire through the church’s stained glass windows. Tragically, the attack resulted in the deaths of two children, aged 8 and 10, and left 18 others injured. Westman ultimately died by suicide at the scene.

Reports indicate that Westman was a mentally disturbed individual radicalized by leftist jihadist ideology. A manifesto revealed violent fantasies against children, along with a detailed seating map of the church. In addition to anti-Catholic slurs, Westman’s writings included threats against “filthy Zionist Jews” and inscriptions on weapons that read “NUKE INDIA,” “Kill Donald Trump,” and “Israel Must Fall.”

This incident is not isolated; the U.S. has witnessed several high-profile cases of violence involving transgender individuals in recent years. In March 2023, Aiden Hale, a 28-year-old who identified as transgender, killed three children and three staff members at The Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee. Hale’s manifesto referenced the Columbine High School massacre, indicating a troubling pattern of violence.

In November 2022, Anderson Lee Aldrich, who identifies as nonbinary, fatally shot five people and injured 40 others at Club Q, an LGBTQ nightclub in Colorado Springs. Aldrich was subdued by patrons and later sentenced to life in prison.

Critics argue that transgenderism represents a radical ideology that dismisses biological realities. Jessica Hart Steinmann and Leigh Ann O’Neill have noted that it teaches individuals to suppress their instincts and question the fairness of protective rules designed for their safety.

Despite the progressive narrative surrounding Hindu society, traditional Hindu values were not intended for social engineering, and many overlook this fact.

As is often the case following mass shootings in the U.S., the Annunciation Catholic Church shooting ignited a wave of liberal commentary regarding gun laws. The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms, which has become a contentious issue in American politics. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey criticized the focus on “thoughts and prayers,” emphasizing the gravity of the situation as children prayed in a church during their first week of school.

Tariffs and U.S.-India Relations

The U.S.-India relationship is currently facing significant challenges, particularly during the Modi administration. Tariffs and the purchase of Russian oil are not new issues in this bilateral relationship.

During Trump’s first term, tariffs were a major point of contention, with high tariffs on products like Harley-Davidson motorcycles causing friction. In March 2019, the U.S. revoked India’s Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) status, which allowed certain products from India to enter the U.S. duty-free.

More recently, President Joe Biden’s administration has taken a hard stance on India’s compliance with U.S. sanctions. Deputy National Security Advisor Daleep Singh, of Indian descent, warned India of “consequences” for its actions, while Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland imposed a stealth visa ban on Indians for failing to comply with U.S. sanctions on Russia. This led to significant delays for Indians seeking visa appointments.

Senior journalist Prof. M.D. Nalapat noted that Nuland was frustrated by India’s refusal to abandon the S-400 missile deal with Russia, highlighting the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in the region.

Walter Russell Mead, a distinguished fellow at the Hudson Institute, recently suggested a shift toward protectionism in the Indo-Pacific, indicating a bipartisan move away from trade policies that promote export-oriented growth in developing economies. This shift may require India to align its policies with U.S. strategic interests, which include countering Chinese aggression and stabilizing the Middle East.

The Tragic Death of Charlie Kirk

As these discussions unfolded, the tragic news of the killing of Charlie Kirk, a 31-year-old conservative activist, emerged. Kirk was instrumental in mobilizing young voters for Trump’s 2024 campaign through his organization, Turning Point USA.

A college dropout, Kirk was known for engaging with students on college campuses about faith, family, and conservative values. His assassination on a campus—an institution meant to foster diverse ideas and free speech—serves as a grim reminder of the rising violence against conservative voices in America.

These events collectively underscore the complexities of contemporary American society, where ideological battles intersect with issues of safety, policy, and international relations.

Source: Original article

American Veterans Encounter Hamas Threats While Providing Aid in Gaza

American veterans are delivering vital aid to Palestinians in Gaza, navigating threats from Hamas while working with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to provide food and assistance to those in need.

American veterans are collaborating with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) to deliver essential aid to Palestinians affected by nearly two years of conflict. As the situation in Gaza continues to deteriorate, these veterans are committed to ensuring that those in need receive the food and support necessary for survival.

Jason Murray, Scott Weimer, and Brandon Zielinski, all U.S. military veterans, are actively involved in GHF’s operations. They recently shared their experiences with Fox News Digital, expressing pride in their humanitarian efforts. “We kind of built a plane in flight… not even knowing where we were going to land,” Murray remarked, reflecting on the challenges they face in their mission.

Founded in May 2025, GHF began its work more than a year and a half after the onset of the war. The organization has encountered significant obstacles in distributing aid within Gaza. Murray noted that his military background has been instrumental in navigating these challenges as a volunteer with GHF.

Weimer described his involvement as a “natural fit,” emphasizing that his military experience, along with that of his colleagues, has equipped them to identify and utilize the skills of others effectively in this complex environment. Zielinski highlighted his past experiences with bilateral training, which often required overcoming language barriers, as beneficial in his interactions with the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), who coordinate with GHF.

The veterans conveyed the urgency of the situation, recounting the desperation they witnessed among hungry Palestinians seeking food. They also noted the presence of bad actors, including Hamas operatives and gang members, who pose threats to those working with GHF, particularly local Palestinians.

Murray provided insight into how GHF collaborates with the IDF to maintain security during aid distribution. “From a security standpoint, our goal is to provide aid in a safe and secure manner. Hamas does operate in this area. Again, we know that,” he explained. The threat posed by Hamas is a serious concern for GHF personnel, who remain vigilant in their efforts to deliver assistance.

Weimer echoed Murray’s observations, stating that GHF personnel are acutely aware of Hamas’s presence. However, their primary focus remains on delivering aid to those in need. He praised Zielinski’s team for their ability to manage the overwhelming demand for food and assistance while maintaining composure in potentially dangerous situations. “I have never once seen any of us overreact to what would be, I think, to anybody, a very scary situation,” Weimer remarked.

Before commencing their work, Zielinski’s team typically receives a briefing from the IDF regarding the security situation over the previous 48 hours. He noted that the secure distribution sites (SDS) have evolved in response to the ongoing threats. “We’ve had pistols seen before, there’s been AKs seen before. There’s grenades that went off,” Zielinski recounted, emphasizing the need for vigilance. His team actively monitors patterns and reports suspicious activities to intelligence officials, contributing to efforts to identify potential threats.

When asked what the American public should understand about the realities on the ground in Gaza, the veterans urged for more informed perspectives. Weimer expressed frustration with media portrayals of GHF, stating that they are often “so far askew.” He encouraged his family and the public to seek the truth, asserting, “These people that are here, these military veterans that lived a long honorable life, we would never be a part of something [like] what I’ve seen in the media.” He described the misrepresentation as disheartening.

Zielinski emphasized the dedication of GHF volunteers, who are driven by a passion for helping civilians in need. Since its inception, GHF claims to have delivered over 160 million meals to Palestinians. Despite facing threats and criticism, the organization continues to call on the international community to support its mission of providing food and assistance to those affected by the ongoing conflict.

“Everybody wants to help, and everybody sees the reward for doing so… We all just enjoy doing it,” Zielinski concluded, highlighting the collective commitment of the GHF team to their humanitarian efforts.

Source: Original article

Bera Cautions That Planned Parenthood Cuts Endanger Rural Healthcare Access

Representative Ami Bera warns that proposed cuts to Planned Parenthood could significantly harm healthcare access for over a million Americans, particularly in rural areas.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Representative Ami Bera (D-CA), a physician, recently joined fellow members of the Democratic Doctors Caucus and Planned Parenthood Federation of America CEO Alexis McGill Johnson to voice their concerns regarding cuts to Medicaid proposed by Republican lawmakers.

The group highlighted a provision within a law signed by former President Donald Trump, referred to as the “Big, Ugly Bill.” This provision aims to block Medicaid patients from accessing care at Planned Parenthood facilities, a move that could have dire consequences for healthcare access across the country.

Currently, this provision has been temporarily halted by the courts. However, if implemented, it could lead to the closure of up to 200 health centers, jeopardizing care for approximately 1.1 million Medicaid patients who rely on these services.

Bera emphasized that Planned Parenthood offers a wide range of healthcare services that extend beyond reproductive health. “In many communities across this country, they’re the sole provider of primary care services to women and men,” he stated. He pointed out that in rural and underserved areas, these centers often serve as the only source for essential healthcare services, including cancer screenings, STI testing, and chronic disease management.

<p“The impact of Donald Trump’s bill is clear: it takes away primary services and community health center resources from many Americans, particularly those in rural America,” Bera added. He accused Republican lawmakers of deliberately targeting these critical healthcare services.

Bera concluded by reaffirming the commitment of Democratic doctors to oppose these cuts and hold Republicans accountable for their actions, emphasizing the importance of maintaining access to healthcare for all Americans.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Criticizes UN Vote on Palestinian Statehood

The United States has condemned a recent U.N. General Assembly resolution supporting Palestinian statehood, labeling it a “gift to Hamas” and counterproductive to peace efforts.

The United States has strongly condemned a U.N. General Assembly resolution that supports the creation of a Palestinian state, which passed with a vote of 142 in favor and 10 against, calling it a “gift to Hamas.” The resolution was backed by a coalition led by Saudi Arabia and France, and it has sparked significant backlash from the Trump administration.

U.S. United Nations Counselor Morgan Ortagus expressed the administration’s disapproval following the vote, stating, “Make no mistake — this resolution is a gift to Hamas.” She emphasized that the United States would not participate in what she described as an “insult to the victims of Oct. 7,” referring to the recent violence in the region. Ortagus further asserted that the resolution undermines diplomatic efforts aimed at achieving peace and securing the release of hostages.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, a White House official reiterated President Trump’s stance, indicating that recognizing a Palestinian state would reward Hamas and hinder efforts to bring hostages home. “He doesn’t think they should be rewarded,” the official stated, reinforcing the administration’s position against the resolution.

The “New York Declaration,” proposed during a U.N. conference in July, aims to outline what its sponsors describe as an “irreversible” path toward Palestinian statehood. The declaration condemns Hamas for the attacks on October 7, demands the release of hostages, and calls for Hamas to relinquish control of Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority.

In Paris, the French Foreign Ministry hailed the resolution’s passage as a “historic vote,” reflecting the international community’s commitment to advancing a comprehensive roadmap for peace and security in the region. The ministry noted that the declaration embodies unprecedented support for principles such as an immediate ceasefire, the release of hostages, and the establishment of a viable, sovereign Palestinian state. It also confirmed that discussions would continue at a follow-up conference in New York on September 22, which will be attended by French President Emmanuel Macron.

Israel’s U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon criticized the vote, labeling it as “theater” and warning that the only beneficiaries would be Hamas. “When terrorists are the ones cheering, you are not advancing peace; you are advancing terror,” he stated, reflecting the concerns of many Israeli officials regarding the implications of the resolution.

Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and president of Human Rights Voices, described the declaration as “a direct threat to American national security” and an “unabashed attempt to destroy the Jewish state.” She expressed particular concern over the provisions related to the so-called right of return, which she argued could lead to a mass influx of Palestinians into Israel, potentially undermining the Jewish majority and self-determination.

Bayefsky criticized the resolution’s provisions regarding Hamas as “smoke and mirrors,” asserting that it undermines the Abraham Accords by restoring a Palestinian veto over regional peace initiatives. She called for a robust response from the United States to counter what she views as a dangerous precedent.

While the U.S. and nine other countries, including Argentina, Hungary, Israel, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, and Tonga, voted against the resolution, Bayefsky expressed disappointment with Germany’s support for the measure, describing it as “absolutely shocking.” She emphasized that undermining the necessity of Jewish self-determination is “abhorrent.”

On the diplomatic front, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced plans to visit Israel ahead of high-level U.N. meetings later this month, where countries such as France and Britain are expected to formally recognize Palestinian statehood. The developments in the U.N. and the international response to the resolution indicate a complex and evolving landscape in the pursuit of peace in the region.

Source: Original article

Lawmakers Respond to Kirk’s Assassination and Political Violence Concerns

Following the assassination of Charlie Kirk, lawmakers from both parties are raising alarms about the escalating violence in U.S. political discourse.

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, bipartisan concern has emerged among lawmakers regarding the deteriorating state of political discourse in the United States. The tragic event has intensified discussions about the alarming rise in political violence that has plagued the nation in recent months.

Kirk’s assassination marks a grim chapter in a series of violent incidents targeting high-profile political figures. This trend began in July 2024, when former President Donald Trump was shot while campaigning for a second term in Butler, Pennsylvania. Just months later, Trump faced another assassination attempt. In April, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro was the victim of an arson attack, and in June, two Minnesota lawmakers and their families were attacked, resulting in two fatalities.

The chilling impact of this violence has led some lawmakers to cancel public appearances due to fears for their safety. “We have a climate right now where people who are frankly unhinged… like the two guys who tried to shoot President Trump, one who did shoot him, the person – whoever it is – who killed Charlie, the person who went after the Minnesota lawmakers – these people are nuts,” Senator Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told Fox News Digital. “But they are egged on by a climate that says, ‘Hey, you know, it’s okay basically to go out and shoot your opponents because they’re really Hitler.’”

This sentiment was echoed by Democratic lawmakers, who expressed their own fears about the current political climate. “It’s really sad and just scary, you know, honestly, just how dire things have gotten in this country in terms of our political discourse,” said Senator Andy Kim, D-N.J. He noted a recent survey indicating that over 50% of Americans would label members of the opposing political party as “the enemy,” a notion he described as “terrifying” and “dangerous.”

Senator Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., emphasized the necessity of respectful political engagement, stating that for democracy to function, individuals must be able to “passionately share [their] viewpoints and do so knowing that we resolve our differences through advocacy and voting, not through violence.”

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., remarked on the implications of Kirk’s death for political discourse. “I don’t know what it says about political discourse, but it certainly says something about violence, and it has no business in political discourse. You can have a robust disagreement with people, but when it turns to violence, something’s gone badly wrong,” he said.

Kirk was known for his passionate yet respectful engagement with students across the political spectrum as part of Turning Point USA, the grassroots organization he co-founded in 2012. He frequently visited college campuses nationwide, hosting debates and “Prove Me Wrong” events, where students could challenge his views directly.

Representative Thomas Massie, R-Ky., reflected on the loss of Kirk, stating, “I mean, that’s the shame of this. Charlie Kirk was polite, he had a message, and he spread that message, and he engaged people to speak and debate, and then he lost his life for that. That’s the thing about this country, we have freedom of speech. Nobody should ever take out violence based on something somebody said.”

Representative Jonathan Jackson, D-Ill., urged for a collective reflection on the current political rhetoric, warning that “these violent words precede violent actions.” He emphasized the need for a change in tone to prevent further tragedies.

Hawley suggested a broader perspective might help mitigate the issue. “I’ll just say again, part of the way we stop it is we realize that there’s stuff in life that’s more important than politics,” he advised reporters.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has sparked urgent discussions among lawmakers about the need to address the rising tide of political violence and the rhetoric that fuels it. As the nation grapples with these issues, the hope remains that a return to civil discourse can be achieved.

Source: Original article

Fox News’ Eric Shawn Discusses Cancer and Respiratory Illness from 9/11 Dust

Fox News correspondent Eric Shawn reveals his cancer diagnosis linked to exposure from 9/11 toxic dust during a live report on the 24th anniversary of the attacks.

Fox News correspondent Eric Shawn has disclosed that he was diagnosed with cancer this year as a result of exposure to toxic dust from the September 11 attacks. His revelation came during a live segment on “Fox & Friends” commemorating the 24th anniversary of the tragic events.

Reporting from Lower Manhattan, where survivors, families, first responders, and public officials gathered to honor the nearly 3,000 lives lost, Shawn shared his personal battle with 9/11-related cancer. “I have two different diagnoses under the World Trade Center Program,” he stated, referring to the federal initiative that provides monitoring and treatment for those affected by the attacks in New York City, the Pentagon, and Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

Reflecting on the significance of the day, Shawn remarked, “It is hard to believe that it has been nearly a quarter of a century since that day, when radical Islamic terrorism attacked the very heart of our city and our country.” He emphasized that the ideology behind the attacks continues to pose a threat to the nation’s values and freedoms.

Shawn highlighted the ongoing tragedy stemming from the attacks, noting that while 2,977 people were killed on September 11, the number of individuals who have died from 9/11-related illnesses continues to rise due to the toxic dust released during the attacks. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately 48,000 people have reported 9/11-related cancers, with nearly 10,000 new diagnoses occurring in the past year alone.

Since the attacks, more than 3,700 first responders have died, including 2,300 who succumbed to cancer. The Fire Department of the City of New York has been particularly affected, with 409 of its members lost to post-9/11 illnesses.

For Shawn, these statistics resonate deeply, as he grapples with both respiratory issues and cancer linked to the attacks. However, he considers himself fortunate. “I think of all those who were killed that day and those who continue to suffer because of that philosophy — that is not diminished,” he said. “We have to condemn it. We have to despise it. You will never forget.”

Shawn also pointed out that the health impacts extend beyond first responders. “If you were below Canal Street, basically, you were exposed to the dust. I was here reporting on it. That’s what happened with me. I mean, I’m very, very lucky. I think of all those who are suffering much greater … I’ve lost a few friends from this, of course.”

His own diagnosis came years later, first manifesting as a bronchitis-related respiratory issue, followed by a cancer diagnosis this year. “Back then, I remember thinking, maybe in 20, 30 years later I’ll get something. Well, here it is, 24 years,” he reflected.

In closing, Shawn emphasized the importance of national unity in the face of such tragedies. “We’re all in this together. I mean, we are,” he stated. “We are all in it together.”

Source: Original article

Relative of 9/11 Firefighter Criticizes Mamdani for Slogan Silence

The cousin of a 9/11 firefighter criticized New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani for not condemning the slogan “globalize the intifada” during a recent anniversary ceremony.

The cousin of a firefighter who perished in the September 11 attacks took aim at New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani for his reluctance to denounce the controversial slogan “globalize the intifada.” This remark came during a memorial ceremony held in Manhattan on Thursday, where Mike Weinstein, 61, honored his cousin, Stephen Belson, a veteran firefighter who lost his life while attempting to rescue individuals trapped in the South Tower of the World Trade Center.

Weinstein urged all politicians to unequivocally renounce terror and violence. He warned that failing to do so, particularly by not condemning phrases like “globalize the intifada,” could lead to another tragedy akin to 9/11. “I know my cousin Steve and many, many others would agree with me when I say, let’s continue to press all politicians, including those who went home already, to firmly renounce terror and violence,” Weinstein stated. “When political candidates and public officials refuse to condemn global terror and phrases such as ‘globalize the intifada,’ they are inviting another 9/11, God forbid, and they continue to bring daily fear for all New Yorkers,” he added.

Weinstein’s passionate remarks underscored the urgency he feels regarding the political climate. “Enough. Enough is enough,” he continued. “Twenty-four years later, we need all political candidates, including every single potential future mayor — and you know who I’m talking about — of this great city to speak out against terror and unite as freedom-loving New Yorkers. God bless America, land of the free and home of the brave.”

The phrase “globalize the intifada” is widely recognized as an anti-Zionist slogan that advocates for international support of Palestinian resistance against Israel. However, it has been criticized for inciting violence against Israelis and Jews. Throughout his campaign for the Democratic Party’s mayoral nomination, which he won in June, Mamdani has refrained from directly condemning the slogan. Recently, he did indicate that he would “discourage” its use.

In a shift from his earlier stance, Mamdani suggested that discussions with Jewish leaders had influenced his perspective on the slogan’s implications. He acknowledged the disparity between the slogan’s intended message and its detrimental effects on many Jewish New Yorkers. Earlier this summer, Mamdani described the phrase as reflecting “a desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights.” However, he later clarified that it is “not language that I use,” amid growing backlash.

During an appearance on NBC, Mamdani emphasized the importance of using language that clearly conveys his intentions, stating, “The language that I use and the language that I will continue to use to lead this city is that which speaks clearly to my intent, which is an intent grounded in a belief in universal human rights.”

As the political landscape evolves, the discourse surrounding sensitive topics like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains contentious. Weinstein’s remarks serve as a reminder of the deep emotional scars left by the events of 9/11 and the ongoing challenges faced by New Yorkers in navigating these complex issues.

Source: Original article

U.S. Media Express Optimism as Modi and Trump Address Trade Tensions

The U.S. media expressed optimism on September 10 regarding the positive exchange of messages between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump, signaling potential resolution of trade tensions.

On September 10, the U.S. media reacted positively to the exchange of messages between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump, indicating a hopeful outlook for resolving ongoing trade issues, particularly concerning tariffs and trade barriers.

Fox Business reported on the resumption of trade talks, highlighting a “significant shift” in U.S.-India relations after months of heightened tensions. The article noted that the exchange of messages underscores both countries’ commitment to advancing negotiations, although it acknowledged that unresolved disputes in agriculture and energy continue to pose challenges.

In a similar vein, Bloomberg published an editorial titled “Don’t Let Tariffs Tank the US-India Relationship,” urging both nations to focus on their long-term interests. The piece emphasized the importance of maintaining strong ties with India, which it described as the world’s largest democracy and a vital partner in a critical region.

The editorial advised the Trump administration to continue supporting India, particularly in light of its strategic role within the “Quad” diplomatic group, which includes Japan and Australia. It argued that India can significantly contribute to diversifying supply chains, advancing technology, and upholding a rules-based international order in the face of pressures from China.

Bloomberg’s editorial cautioned against allowing trade disputes to undermine a carefully cultivated relationship. It noted that neither China nor Russia could provide the same level of investment, technology transfers, or access to advanced weaponry that the United States can offer. The article urged India to focus on preserving and enhancing its relationship with the U.S. through cooperation in areas such as semiconductors, quantum technology, and defense production, regardless of the status of trade negotiations.

While the editorial expressed hope for a resolution, it also acknowledged the unpredictable nature of political dynamics in Washington, stating that there is “no guarantee” of a deal. Nonetheless, it maintained that a successful resolution could yield significant benefits over time.

As both nations navigate these complex issues, the recent exchanges signal a mutual desire to improve relations and foster cooperation in various sectors, highlighting the importance of dialogue in addressing trade tensions.

Source: Original article

Diabetes Study Identifies Diagnosis Gap Impacting Millions of Americans

Nearly half of the 1.3 billion adults living with diabetes worldwide are undiagnosed, highlighting a significant public health crisis, particularly among young people and in low-income regions.

Researchers are sounding the alarm over a looming diabetes crisis, revealing that nearly half of the 1.3 billion adults affected by the disease are unaware of their condition. This lack of diagnosis leaves millions at risk for serious health complications.

A comprehensive study published in the journal The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology analyzed data from over 200 countries between 2000 and 2023. The research focused on how effectively health systems identify, treat, and manage diabetes, examining the rates of undiagnosed cases, untreated individuals, and those receiving suboptimal care.

According to the findings, approximately 44% of individuals aged 15 and older with diabetes remain undiagnosed. Tanya Freirich, a registered dietitian nutritionist based in North Carolina, emphasized the challenges in early detection. “Many people would not have signs or symptoms until their diabetes is very advanced, and many people are not going to the doctor often or at all for lab work,” she explained, although she was not involved in the study.

While about 91% of diagnosed patients receive medication, fewer than half manage to achieve optimal blood sugar control. This statistic indicates that only about one in five people globally are effectively managing their diabetes.

Young individuals are particularly vulnerable, facing significant long-term health risks such as heart disease, kidney failure, blindness, and nerve damage due to undiagnosed diabetes. The study highlights the urgent need for increased awareness and proactive health measures among younger populations.

Geographical factors also play a crucial role in diagnosis rates. In wealthier nations like the United States and Canada, diagnosis rates are higher, but challenges persist in the long-term management of the disease. Conversely, in lower-income regions, particularly in parts of sub-Saharan Africa, fewer than one in five individuals with diabetes are aware of their condition.

Lauryn Stafford, the lead author of the study and a researcher at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, stated that these alarming statistics should prompt action from governments and health systems worldwide. “By 2050, 1.3 billion people are expected to be living with diabetes, and if nearly half don’t know they have a serious and potentially deadly health condition, it could easily become a silent epidemic,” she warned in a press release.

The study also indicates that current treatment methods often fall short. Merely prescribing medication is insufficient for blood sugar control. Researchers advocate for a more holistic approach that includes monitoring, education, and lifestyle support to effectively manage diabetes.

For individuals with prediabetes, early intervention and moderate lifestyle changes can help return blood glucose levels to a normal range, potentially preventing or delaying the onset of type 2 diabetes, according to the American Diabetes Association.

Experts acknowledge the difficulty in accurately estimating the number of undiagnosed individuals. “Those are data points that are unable to be confirmed until diagnosed,” Freirich noted. “While I do not doubt the accuracy of the tool used in the study, there may be unknown factors that are not included in the model.”

Freirich recommends that everyone undergo regular health check-ups. She also highlights the importance of dietary choices, suggesting that increasing fiber intake through whole, unprocessed, plant-based foods, such as vegetables and nuts, along with maintaining consistent physical activity, can help reduce the risk of diabetes and assist in regulating blood sugar levels.

As the global diabetes crisis unfolds, the need for increased awareness, early diagnosis, and comprehensive management strategies has never been more critical.

Source: Original article

Trade Official’s Use of ‘Brahmins’ on Fox News Provokes Hindu Backlash

President Trump’s senior trade adviser, Peter Navarro, faced backlash from Hindu American groups after using the term “Brahmins” to criticize India’s elite during a Fox News interview.

Peter Navarro, a senior trade adviser to President Donald Trump, has ignited controversy and accusations of Hinduphobia following his use of the term “Brahmins” to describe India’s elite. This comment was made during a Fox News segment on August 31, where Navarro criticized India’s trade policies in light of the administration’s announcement of a new 50% tariff on Indian goods.

In his remarks, Navarro stated, “You have got Brahmins profiteering at the expense of the Indian people, and we want that to stop.” He further labeled New Delhi as “nothing but a laundromat for the Kremlin,” which added fuel to the fire of criticism directed at him.

The term “Brahmin” refers to the highest caste in the traditional Hindu social hierarchy, and its use in this context has drawn ire from the Hindu diaspora and communities in India. Many took to social media to express their outrage, with memes circulating that mocked Navarro’s apparent misunderstanding of Indian caste dynamics. This backlash prompted Hindu American organizations to call for Navarro’s immediate removal from his position.

Ajay Shah, the executive chair of the lobbying organization HinduPACT, condemned Navarro’s comments as “weaponized Hinduphobia.” He stated, “Dividing Hindus through colonial scripts doesn’t build relationships. It destroys them. People like Navarro have no place in American political life.”

Navarro’s comments coincided with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s significant visit to China, where he met with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping. The timing of the tariff announcement, which India has criticized as “unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,” has heightened tensions between the two nations.

American Hindus Against Defamation, a branch of HinduPACT, echoed the call for Navarro’s dismissal, labeling his remarks as a “reckless provocation” that threatens the dignity of over a billion Hindus worldwide. Their statement emphasized that using caste rhetoric to pressure a democratic ally is beneath the democratic dignity of the United States.

In Hindu tradition, Brahmins are associated with priestly and scholarly roles, historically responsible for conducting rituals and preserving sacred texts. Today, they make up approximately 4% to 5% of India’s population. The caste system, which is a birth-based social hierarchy, has been a topic of significant debate and contention, especially among the Indian diaspora in the United States.

In response to Navarro’s comments, Indian industrial CEO Harsh Goenka took to social media to clarify misconceptions about the Indian elite. He pointed out that many of India’s top business leaders, including those from major corporations like Tata and Reliance, do not belong to the Brahmin caste. Goenka stated, “But India’s soldiers, scientists, poets? Many were … Unlike some others who are trying to lobby for the Nobel prize, our Brahmins got their prize only through merit.”

Priyanka Chaturvedi, a member of India’s Shiv Sena political party, also criticized Navarro’s remarks on social media, describing them as “shameful and sinister.” She urged him to refrain from making comments that invoke caste identity to make political points.

In the United States, the term “Brahmin” has historically been used in different contexts. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, “Boston Brahmins” referred to an elite class of wealthy, white Protestant families who held significant cultural and political influence in New England.

Debates surrounding caste in modern America have been complex. Some argue that the focus on condemning caste has led to what they call “Hinduphobia,” suggesting that caste distinctions were exaggerated by colonial powers to divide Indians. Others maintain that casteism persists in various forms within American society, affecting opportunities and access for Indian Americans.

Research indicates that a significant majority of Indian immigrants to the U.S. belong to higher castes, with one study estimating that 90% of Indian Americans fall into this category. Prominent figures such as Sundar Pichai and Indra Nooyi, both CEOs, are part of the Tamil Brahmin community. Additionally, former Vice President Kamala Harris’s mother was also a member of this group.

A 2024 study by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace revealed that 32% of Indian American respondents did not identify with any caste, while 46% identified as “general or upper caste.” The study also found overwhelming support among Indian Americans for measures to formally outlaw caste discrimination.

Despite these statistics, advocates like Deepa Karthik, general secretary of HinduPACT, argue that caste rhetoric remains prevalent in America, particularly from those outside the community. “When someone like Navarro uses caste to shame India, it lands on Hindus here,” Karthik stated. “Kids get bullied. Workers get profiled. We get treated like we owe the world an apology for our heritage.”

This incident underscores the complexities surrounding discussions of caste and identity, particularly in the context of U.S.-India relations and the broader implications for the Hindu community in America.

Source: Original article

Democratic Senator Defends Against Accusations of Using Veterans as Props

Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia faces accusations from Republicans regarding his claims about a veterans housing bill, which he defends as a celebration of bipartisan efforts to assist veterans.

Senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat from Georgia, has dismissed Republican accusations that he misrepresented his involvement in the passage of a veterans housing bill. He questioned, “Is this the best they’ve got?” in response to the criticism.

The controversy centers around claims that Ossoff exaggerated his role in helping to pass legislation designed to prevent veterans from losing their homes. Some local media outlets inaccurately reported that Ossoff co-sponsored the bill, despite his lack of formal involvement.

Ossoff shared a video on social media last week featuring a news report that documented his press conference alongside local leaders and veterans groups. This event occurred shortly after President Donald Trump signed the VA Home Loan Program Reform Act. In the video caption, Ossoff stated that he “championed” the bipartisan bill aimed at protecting veterans.

However, a Fox News analysis revealed that Ossoff was not a co-sponsor of the legislation and did not vote on it. The bill was passed by unanimous consent in the House and through a voice vote in the Senate. Furthermore, Ossoff did not introduce any companion legislation in the Senate, nor was he present or active during the Senate floor discussions in July, according to a GOP source.

Republicans have criticized Ossoff’s messaging, arguing that he had “absolutely nothing” to do with the bill. When asked to clarify the discrepancies regarding his claims, Ossoff’s team defended his statements, asserting that he was merely celebrating the passage of a bipartisan bill that addressed a problem created by Republicans.

A spokesperson for Ossoff stated, “The Trump administration canceled the VASP program, and Sen. Ossoff sounded the alarm that its cancellation risked veteran homelessness, then celebrated the passage of a bipartisan bill to solve the problem. This is the best they’ve got?”

The VA Home Loan Reform Act is intended to replace the Veterans Affairs Servicing Purchase (VASP) program, which Ossoff previously criticized the Trump administration for terminating. Rep. Derrick Van Orden, a Republican from Wisconsin and the lead sponsor of the VA Home Loan Reform Act, described the VASP program as “fiscally irresponsible” and stated it was “endangering the entire VA home loan guarantee program.”

After Van Orden highlighted Ossoff’s social media posts claiming he “championed” the new veteran foreclosure bill, he accused the senator of telling a “bald-faced lie.” Other Republicans joined in the criticism, attacking Ossoff on social media platforms.

Rep. Buddy Carter, a Republican from Georgia, referred to Ossoff’s statements as “pathetic, disgusting lies,” suggesting that the senator was using veterans as props for political gain. He stated, “Congrats on showing Georgians you’re not above using veterans as props for your press stunts. Your empty suit gimmicks spit in the face of people you claim to serve.”

Senator Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, echoed similar sentiments, asserting that Ossoff had no involvement in the Republican-led efforts to assist veterans. He criticized Ossoff for attempting to take credit amid what he described as political desperation, stating, “Georgia deserves so much better.”

Van Orden reiterated that Ossoff had no role in the bill, emphasizing, “He did not even vote for it; it passed by unanimous consent. This disgusting and shameful behavior must stop. Veterans are not political props.”

The controversy surrounding Ossoff’s claims has led to multiple local news outlets reporting inaccuracies regarding his role in the Veterans Affairs legislation. For instance, WSB Radio in Atlanta published an article stating that a new law co-sponsored by Ossoff aimed to prevent veteran foreclosures. However, according to official records, Van Orden was the bill’s sole sponsor.

The bill was forwarded to the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee for approval before being passed by a voice vote in the Senate, where Ossoff is not a member.

Ossoff’s team announced that President Trump signed the Veterans Affairs Home Loan Program Reform Act into law on a Wednesday, describing it as bipartisan legislation that Ossoff co-sponsored and supported to assist veterans relying on VA loans. This assertion has been challenged by critics who argue that Ossoff’s claims are misleading.

As Ossoff prepares for his 2026 re-election campaign, he faces a competitive Republican field, including Derek Dooley, a former University of Tennessee football coach and ally of Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, as well as Republican Representatives Mike Collins and Buddy Carter.

As the political landscape evolves, the scrutiny surrounding Ossoff’s claims highlights the contentious nature of political discourse, particularly regarding issues affecting veterans.

Source: Original article

World Leaders Mourn Charlie Kirk Following Shocking Assassination in Utah

World leaders condemned political violence following the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk, a conservative media figure, during a speaking engagement at Utah Valley University.

International leaders expressed their outrage and sorrow on Wednesday after the tragic news broke that Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative media personality and co-founder of Turning Point USA, was shot and killed during a speaking event at Utah Valley University. Kirk, 31, was a husband and father of two.

Former President Donald Trump confirmed Kirk’s death in a social media post, revealing that he had been hospitalized after suffering a neck wound from the shooting.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was among the first world leaders to voice his grief over Kirk’s assassination. He stated on social media, “Charlie Kirk was murdered for speaking truth and defending freedom.” Netanyahu described Kirk as a “lion-hearted friend of Israel” who fought against falsehoods and stood firm for Judeo-Christian values. He noted that he had spoken with Kirk just two weeks prior and had invited him to Israel, lamenting that “sadly, that visit will not take place.” He concluded his tribute by acknowledging Kirk’s profound pride in America and his unwavering belief in free speech, stating, “Rest in peace, Charlie Kirk.”

Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni also expressed her condolences, stating on X that she was “shocked by the news of the killing of Charlie Kirk.” She characterized the act as “an atrocious murder, a deep wound for democracy and for those who believe in freedom.” Meloni extended her sympathies to Kirk’s family, loved ones, and the American conservative community.

Argentina’s President Javier Milei shared a personal photo with Kirk and former Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, offering condolences to Kirk’s family and to the young people worldwide who admired him. He called Kirk “a formidable disseminator of the ideas of freedom and staunch defender of the West,” labeling him a “victim of an atrocious murder” and attributing blame to the “left,” despite law enforcement officials not confirming the identity of the shooter. “The entire world lost an incredible human being,” Milei added.

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer also expressed his sorrow and condemned political violence in a post on X, stating, “My thoughts this evening are with the loved ones of Charlie Kirk.” He emphasized the heartbreak of a young family being robbed of a father and husband, asserting that “we must all be free to debate openly and freely without fear – there can be no justification for political violence.”

Numerous leaders across the U.K. echoed Starmer’s sentiments, including Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, who shared a photo with Kirk and remarked, “This is a very dark day for American democracy.” He expressed his deep sadness for Kirk, his wife, and children.

New Zealand’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Winston Peters, also condemned the rise of political violence and its threat to democracy. He stated on X, “It is tragic that we now live in a world where differences of opinion are met with a gun,” emphasizing that Kirk’s death should not merely be classified as “political violence” but rather as “an assassination.” Peters lamented the loss, noting that Kirk had traveled extensively to university campuses to provide open forums for debate, where all voices were welcomed. He warned that “the essence of democracy is under threat around the world and we must do everything we can to protect it.”

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has sparked a global conversation about the dangers of political violence and the importance of safeguarding democratic discourse.

Source: Original article

Congress President Kharge Meets Bihar Leaders to Discuss Poll Strategy

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi met with Bihar leaders to strategize for upcoming assembly polls, focusing on seat sharing and campaign preparations.

New Delhi: Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, accompanied by Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, convened a meeting with Bihar leaders on Tuesday to discuss preparations for the upcoming assembly elections in the state.

This meeting follows the recent conclusion of the Voter Adhikar Yatra, led by Rahul Gandhi, which the party claims has revitalized its workers and cadres across Bihar.

Chaired by Kharge, the meeting included prominent figures such as Screening Committee Chairman Ajay Maken, KC Venugopal, Bihar in-charge Krishna Allavaru, state unit chief Rajesh Kumar, and several party MPs, including Tariq Anwar, Mohammad Javed, Akhilesh Prasad Singh, Manoj Kumar, Ranjeet Ranjan, and CLP Mohammad Shekeel Ahmed Khan. NSUI in-charge Kanhaiya Kumar, Madan Mohan Jha, and Pappu Yadav were also in attendance.

Lasting over an hour, the discussions encompassed various topics, including seat sharing, the party’s electoral preparedness, and other pertinent issues.

Following the meeting, Allavaru addressed the media, stating that multiple issues were deliberated upon. He highlighted that discussions included seat sharing, the manifesto, and the campaign committee. Additionally, he mentioned that a future strategy had been established during the meeting.

A Congress source indicated that the party aims to maintain momentum in Bihar, with several programs featuring Rahul Gandhi and other senior leaders planned to commence from September 20. The source also noted that discussions regarding seat sharing would continue with alliance partners in the state, as Congress seeks to secure respectable seats, given the party’s historical significance in the region.

During his 16-day Voter Adhikar Yatra, Rahul Gandhi visited over 25 districts in Bihar, engaging with local communities and addressing key issues.

The polling for the 243-member assembly is scheduled for later this year. The ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA), comprising the BJP, JDU, HAM-S, and LJPR, is aiming to retain power, while the Mahagatbandhan, led by the RJD, Congress, VIP, and Left parties, is working to reclaim control.

During Rahul Gandhi’s yatra in Bihar, the Mahagatbandhan raised concerns regarding voter theft, highlighting the ongoing electoral challenges in the state.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Agenda and DOGE Cuts Impact Virginia Special Election

President Donald Trump’s policies, particularly job cuts and social issues, are central to the Virginia special election to fill a vacant House seat, with candidates debating their impacts on local voters.

In a special congressional election taking place in northern Virginia, President Donald Trump is a significant presence, despite not being on the ballot. The election, scheduled for Tuesday, will fill the seat left vacant by the late Democratic Representative Gerry Connolly, who passed away in June after a battle with cancer.

The race is primarily between Democratic nominee James Walkinshaw and Republican nominee Stewart Whitson. Key issues dominating the campaign include job cuts implemented by Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), crime and immigration policies, transgender rights, and calls for the release of Justice Department files related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Walkinshaw, who serves on the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors and previously worked as Connolly’s chief of staff, argues that Trump’s controversial agenda will significantly influence the election outcome in Virginia’s left-leaning 11th Congressional District. He stated that many voters in the area have been directly affected by the job cuts and layoffs associated with DOGE.

“Folks in Northern Virginia and Fairfax are feeling the impact of the Trump policies,” Walkinshaw said on the eve of the election. “Everybody in Fairfax knows someone who has lost their job because of DOGE or the Trump policies.” He emphasized that the district is experiencing the effects of these policies firsthand, which he believes will resonate with voters.

Whitson, an Army veteran and former FBI special agent, counters that Walkinshaw’s focus on opposing Trump is misguided. He argues that voters need solutions rather than empathy for those who have lost jobs. “The people in our district who have lost their job or who are worried about losing their job, they don’t need empathy. They need solutions,” Whitson said.

While Trump is not particularly popular in the district—having garnered only 31% of the vote in his re-election bid—Whitson maintains that Trump’s policies are rooted in common sense. He criticized Democrats for what he describes as “radical left” policies that are out of touch with the needs of the community.

Whitson also addressed the contentious issue of transgender rights in schools, asserting that he believes it is a civil right for girls to have access to safe spaces. “My opponent believes it is a civil right for men who identify as girls or women to go into our girls’ locker rooms and watch them change,” he charged. “I think this is all backwards.” He emphasized the importance of ensuring safety for all children in public facilities.

In response, Walkinshaw accused Whitson of fixating on a small percentage of students while neglecting the broader educational needs of all children in the district. “What I hear from folks in our community, and what I’m focused on, is how 100% of our kids can succeed in the classrooms,” he stated.

As the campaign progresses, Whitson has attempted to link Walkinshaw to Zohran Mamdani, a socialist candidate who recently won the Democratic mayoral nomination in New York City. “This is someone who has a history of supporting a lot of the exact same type of policies that Mamdani is supporting,” Whitson claimed, urging voters to consider the implications of such associations.

Walkinshaw dismissed the comparison, stating that voters in the 11th District are primarily concerned with local issues rather than political events in New York City. “Not a single voter has asked me about the New York mayor’s election,” he said. “I care what happens to folks right here in the 11th District.”

Another significant topic in the election is the push for the Justice Department to release files related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. Walkinshaw noted that this issue resonates across the political spectrum, with many voters questioning whether there has been a cover-up regarding the files during the Biden administration.

If elected, Walkinshaw has pledged to sign a discharge petition led by Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California and Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, which calls for the release of Epstein-related documents. “I absolutely will sign it,” he affirmed. “I think the American people deserve to know.” He expressed a desire to uncover any potential cover-ups by the Trump administration.

Whitson, however, criticized Walkinshaw for being late to address the issue, asserting that he had called for full disclosure of the Epstein files months ago. He accused Walkinshaw of politicizing the matter for personal gain, stating, “How long has this case been going on, and now he finally wants to reach on those records?”

The outcome of this special election could have significant implications for the balance of power in the House of Representatives, where Republicans currently hold a slim majority. With three Democratic seats vacant and one held by the GOP, a victory for Walkinshaw would further narrow the Republican majority in a district that has not elected a Republican in nearly two decades.

As voters prepare to cast their ballots, the impact of Trump’s policies and the candidates’ differing visions for the future of the district remain at the forefront of this critical election.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration May Restrict Iranian Diplomats’ Access to Costco Shopping

The Trump administration is considering visa restrictions for Iranian diplomats, potentially barring them from shopping at wholesale stores like Costco ahead of the U.N. General Assembly.

The Trump administration is evaluating new visa restrictions for several countries, including Iran, Sudan, Zimbabwe, and surprisingly, Brazil, as the U.N. General Assembly approaches later this month in New York. This move follows the recent denial of visas to Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas and is part of a broader crackdown on visa issuance by the administration.

According to an internal memo from the State Department reviewed by The Associated Press, these restrictions could be implemented before the General Assembly convenes on September 22. The inclusion of Brazil in this list is particularly unexpected, given the country’s traditional role of honor during the assembly, where it often delivers the first address on opening day.

As the administration considers these measures, it continues to review both current visa holders and those seeking entry for the U.N. meeting. One notable proposal would prevent Iranian diplomats, who already face stringent restrictions in New York, from shopping at wholesale retailers such as Costco and Sam’s Club without prior approval from the State Department.

Historically, Iranian diplomats have utilized these wholesale stores to purchase bulk goods that are not readily available in their home country, allowing them to ship items back at a lower cost. However, the potential shopping ban raises questions about the extent of the administration’s restrictions on foreign diplomats.

It remains uncertain when or if the shopping ban would be enacted. The memo indicated that the State Department is considering drafting rules that would allow it to impose conditions on wholesale club memberships for all foreign diplomats residing in the United States.

Additionally, it is unclear whether any restrictions would specifically affect Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva or other delegates attending the General Assembly. The Brazilian president’s attendance is significant, as he typically addresses the assembly first, followed by the U.S. president.

Relations between President Trump and President Lula have been strained, particularly following Lula’s prosecution of Trump ally Jair Bolsonaro, who is accused of leading an attempted coup. In contrast, Syria’s delegation is expected to face fewer restrictions after receiving a waiver from travel limits that have been in place for over a decade.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the State Department for further comment regarding these potential restrictions. The situation remains fluid as the administration weighs its options ahead of the upcoming assembly.

Source: Original article

Pakistani Intruder Captured at Indo-Pak Border During Infiltration Attempt

Border Security Force apprehends a Pakistani national attempting to infiltrate the Indo-Pak border in R.S. Pura, raising concerns about potential hostile operations.

In a significant security operation, the Border Security Force (BSF) successfully thwarted an infiltration attempt along the Indo-Pak international border in the R.S. Pura sector on Monday. The BSF apprehended a Pakistani national, identified as a resident of Sarkoda, during the incident near the Border Out Post (BOP) Octroi, which is directly opposite Pakistan’s BOP Inayat and falls under the jurisdiction of the 165th Battalion BSF.

According to security sources, alert BSF personnel observed a young man moving suspiciously toward the border fence from the Pakistani side. When confronted, the intruder continued to advance, prompting the BSF troops to apprehend him before he could breach the fence.

The individual was taken into custody, and initial interrogations indicated that he may be mentally unstable. Nonetheless, security agencies are treating the situation with the utmost seriousness. Sources have confirmed that the individual hails from Sarkoda, a location of strategic significance that was previously targeted by the Indian Air Force during Operation Sindoor.

This connection has led senior BSF officials and other security agencies to personally interrogate the suspect. Intelligence officials are investigating whether his movement was part of a reconnaissance mission, a test of border alertness, or linked to a broader infiltration plan. Given the strategic importance of Sarkoda and the heavy damage it sustained during Indian military operations, investigators are eager to determine whether the intruder acted independently or was sent with a specific mission.

“The line of questioning is aimed at uncovering whether this infiltration attempt had a deeper operational purpose or if it was merely a diversionary tactic,” a source familiar with the interrogation process stated.

Senior BSF officials have reiterated that no infiltration attempt can be taken lightly. “The border is under constant surveillance, and any misadventure from across will be dealt with firmly,” an officer emphasized.

This incident underscores Pakistan’s ongoing attempts to push individuals across the border, despite the heightened security measures and vigilant monitoring by Indian forces. The R.S. Pura, Arnia, and Samba sectors remain particularly sensitive, having witnessed past infiltration attempts and cross-border activities.

As investigations continue, intelligence agencies are working diligently to uncover the motives behind the infiltration and any potential links to hostile elements based in Pakistan.

Source: Original article

Mamdani Criticized for Using Children in Campaign Videos

New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani faces criticism for using children in campaign videos while advocating for a social media-free childhood.

Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old candidate for mayor of New York City, has come under fire for featuring elementary school children in his political campaign videos. This backlash follows his recent remarks about how fortunate he was to have a childhood free from the influence of social media.

The criticism intensified as Mamdani shared videos of two children endorsing his candidacy on Instagram, despite his previous comments highlighting the negative impact of social media on youth interactions. The timing of these posts coincided with the launch of a statewide cellphone ban in New York City schools, aimed at safeguarding student mental health.

On Thursday, Mamdani was seen outside I.S. 5 in Queens, where he praised the new cellphone restrictions while welcoming families for the first day of the school year. In an Instagram post, he reflected on his own childhood, contrasting it with the current digital landscape. He wrote, “I consider myself fortunate—when I was a student, it was before social media had cannibalized the way that kids interact with one another.” This post was accompanied by a message about “hope and new beginnings” as students returned to school.

However, just days later, Mamdani’s campaign accounts showcased videos of two young children speaking directly to him and Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts. In one clip, a young girl confidently endorsed Mamdani, while in another, a boy expressed his support with Warren present.

Comments from followers on these posts reflected a mix of admiration and criticism. One user remarked on the girl’s articulate nature despite her small stature, while others questioned the appropriateness of using children to promote a political agenda. “Why are you using kids to promote your political agenda?” one follower asked, echoing sentiments from others who felt that involving children in such a manner was unacceptable.

This controversy arises in the context of a broader conversation about the role of technology in children’s lives. New York Governor Kathy Hochul recently defended the cellphone ban, arguing that it would help reduce distractions, improve mental health, and protect children during emergencies by preventing location-sharing. The new law prohibits the use of smartphones and smartwatches in public schools during school hours, except for medical or educational purposes.

Mamdani, who gained attention after unseating a longtime incumbent in the Democratic primary, is campaigning on a platform of progressive policies, including a proposed $30 minimum wage and a rent freeze. His approach has resonated with some voters, but the recent backlash over his use of children in campaign materials raises questions about the consistency of his message.

As the mayoral election approaches, Mamdani’s campaign will need to navigate the complexities of public perception, especially regarding the use of children in political discourse. The juxtaposition of his advocacy for a social media-free childhood with his campaign strategies may challenge his credibility among voters.

Fox News Digital reached out to Mamdani for comment regarding the criticism but has not yet received a response.

Source: Original article

A Call for Truth and Accountability in North Hollywood’s Indian-American Community

Gurdial Singh, brother of Harpal Singh, calls for community support and accountability following a violent assault that left Harpal in critical condition in North Hollywood.

On a recent Tuesday afternoon, Gurdial Singh ji reached out to share distressing news regarding his brother, Harpal Singh ji, who was violently assaulted in the parking lot of a 7-11 in North Hollywood. This incident occurred just a short distance from the local Gurdwara where Harpal had been staying.

The call was in relation to a preliminary hearing scheduled for the following day. Gurdial ji informed me that the defendant would be present, and the District Attorney would outline the charges against him. He was rallying local sangat members to attend the hearing as a show of support for his family. However, I was taken aback when the conversation shifted from the hearing details to food.

Gurdial ji expressed his desire to ensure that no one attending the hearing would go hungry. He planned to bring paronthey (stuffed or layered pan-fried flatbread) and daahi (yogurt) and asked if he should also bring sabji (vegetables). Given the personal tragedy his family was enduring, I found it remarkable that his thoughts were focused on the well-being of others. Yet, having gotten to know the family over the past few weeks, I should not have been surprised.

For several weeks, I have been in contact with Gurdial Singh ji and his family regarding the assault. Like many others, I was deeply affected by the video showing Harpal Singh ji with blood streaming down his face, a clear indication of the brutal beating he had suffered. Although I did not know Harpal Singh ji personally, his composed demeanor, sitting cross-legged in the midst of such chaos, conveyed a sense of quiet strength and resilience in the face of senseless violence.

As the Executive Director of SALDEF and a resident of North Hollywood, I am familiar with the area where the assault took place. My husband works nearby, and we both have engaged in conversations with neighbors and members of the sangat about Harpal Singh and the broader North Hollywood community. Through these discussions, a vivid picture of Harpal Singh ji emerges.

Harpal Singh ji was a devout Gursikh who dedicated himself to serving both his sangat and the wider North Hollywood community. Community members fondly recall his acts of kindness, such as feeding birds, providing meals to the needy, and assisting those in distress. Many remember seeing him on his daily walks, embodying the values he lived by.

Harpal Singh’s family exemplifies these same values. Conversations with the Bhai Sahibs at the North Hollywood Gurdwara revealed that Gurdial Singh ji often arrives as early as 4 a.m. to perform seva (selfless service). Therefore, it was not surprising that, just a day before the hearing—when the family would confront the man accused of brutally attacking their loved one—their focus remained on the community.

Currently, the case is under investigation by the LAPD. The preliminary hearing initially scheduled for August 27 was postponed to September 2, when evidence will be presented by the District Attorney’s office.

Despite Harpal Singh ji remaining in critical condition and unable to advocate for himself, the LAPD Chief of Police has publicly characterized the attack as a “property dispute.” This statement has raised concerns within the community, as it seems not only premature but also inconsistent with the Harpal Singh ji that many have come to know. Unless there are witnesses who can clarify the events leading up to the assault or evidence to support this claim, the facts surrounding the incident remain unclear. Our community deserves to know the truth about what transpired that afternoon. Harpal Singh’s family deserves accountability, and our sangat, which has shown remarkable grace and resilience in the face of violence, deserves a legal system that respects their dignity rather than dismisses their pain.

As we navigate this imperfect legal system, my sincere hope is that the eventual verdict will reflect the reality of the situation and that Harpal Singh’s family, along with our community, will receive the answers we urgently seek.

Above all, we demand the truth regarding what happened to Harpal Singh ji on the afternoon of August 4, 2025, in North Hollywood, CA.

Source: Original article

Democrats Criticize Trump’s ‘War’ Threats Against U.S. Cities

Democrats are condemning President Trump’s recent social media post that suggested military action and deportations in Chicago, calling it an inappropriate threat against U.S. cities.

Democrats across the United States are voicing strong criticism of President Donald Trump following a controversial social media post that appeared to threaten Chicago with military intervention and deportations. The post, shared on Truth Social, featured an AI-generated image of Trump styled as Robert Duvall’s character from the iconic Vietnam War film “Apocalypse Now.” The image was accompanied by the phrase “Chipocalypse Now” and a play on a famous quote from the film: “I love the smell of deportations in the morning.”

In the post, Trump stated, “Chicago about to find out why it’s called the Department of WAR,” referencing his recent executive order that renamed the Department of Defense to the Department of War. This provocative message has sparked outrage among local and state leaders, particularly as discussions about deploying the National Guard to address crime in Chicago have intensified.

California Governor Gavin Newsom was among the first to respond, condemning Trump for using military personnel as “political pawns.” He urged Americans not to become desensitized to such threats, stating, “The President of the United States is deploying the military onto US streets and using our troops like political pawns.” Newsom’s comments reflect a broader concern among Democrats regarding the militarization of domestic issues.

Illinois Senators Tammy Duckworth and Dick Durbin also expressed their disapproval of Trump’s remarks. Duckworth, a combat veteran and retired Army National Guard lieutenant colonel, asserted, “No Donald, Chicago is not your war zone.” Durbin echoed her sentiments, criticizing Trump for diverting attention from pressing national issues such as job reports and public health crises. He described the notion of deploying troops to Chicago as “disgusting” and an embarrassment for the nation.

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker joined the chorus of criticism, labeling Trump’s threats as a serious matter. “The President of the United States is threatening to go to war with an American city,” Pritzker wrote. “This is not a joke. This is not normal. Donald Trump isn’t a strongman; he’s a scared man. Illinois won’t be intimidated by a wannabe dictator.”

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has also been vocal in his opposition to Trump’s comments. He highlighted recent data indicating a decline in violent crime in the city, with homicides and robberies decreasing by over 30% and shootings dropping by nearly 40%. Johnson remarked, “The President’s threats are beneath the honor of our nation, but the reality is that he wants to occupy our city and break our Constitution.” He emphasized the need to protect democracy from what he described as authoritarianism.

The backlash against Trump’s post underscores the growing tension between the federal government and local authorities regarding crime and public safety. As discussions about the potential deployment of the National Guard continue, Illinois leaders remain firm in their stance against what they perceive as unwarranted military threats against American cities.

According to Fox News, the situation continues to evolve as local leaders prepare to respond to any federal actions that may arise.

Source: Original article

Hezbollah and Iran Exploit Venezuela’s Drug Trade for Funding

Hezbollah and Iran have established a cocaine cash machine in Venezuela, which not only supports Maduro’s regime but also fuels global terror networks, according to experts.

Hezbollah and Iran have developed a sophisticated cocaine cash operation in Venezuela, which serves to bolster Nicolás Maduro’s regime while simultaneously funding terror networks worldwide. Recent U.S. military actions in the Caribbean are viewed by experts as part of a larger strategy to dismantle this growing narco empire.

U.S. officials have identified the Tren de Aragua gang as a key player in this operation, closely collaborating with the Cartel of the Suns, a network of Venezuelan military elites accused of cocaine trafficking in partnership with Hezbollah. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly emphasized the Trump administration’s commitment to countering Iran’s terrorist proxies, stating, “President Trump has taken numerous actions to curtail Iran’s terrorist proxies like Hezbollah, such as sanctioning senior officials and financial facilitators.” She added that the administration is determined to hold accountable any terrorist group that threatens U.S. national security through narcotics smuggling.

Brian Townsend, a retired DEA special agent, described recent U.S. actions as a “decisive blow against narco-terrorists.” He noted that while Hezbollah’s involvement is often hidden from view, it is crucial to the operation. “They don’t get their hands dirty. Instead, they launder and provide networks to help cartels send money through the Middle East,” he explained. Townsend added that Hezbollah takes a cut from the drug trade, which in turn funds their operations in the Middle East.

Dani Citrinowicz, a senior fellow at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies, highlighted Hezbollah’s reliance on the Lebanese diaspora in the region. “Most of the Shia diaspora, at least in Central and South America, is Lebanese,” he told Fox News Digital. “Hezbollah is the connector between the diaspora and Iran.” He elaborated on how the group utilizes family connections, language, and community institutions to strengthen its influence across Latin America. Through these networks, Hezbollah can engage with local cartels, facilitate drug sales, and channel profits back to Lebanon through complex schemes.

Citrinowicz emphasized that Hezbollah’s role as a connector is vital to Iran’s strategy in the Western Hemisphere. “The connection starts and ends with enmity towards the West in general, specifically to the United States,” he stated. He further asserted that as long as Maduro remains in power, Iran will maintain its foothold in the region. Conversely, if Maduro were to be ousted, Iran would lose its most significant stronghold in Latin America.

Townsend noted that the partnership between Iran and Maduro is mutually beneficial. “Iran’s partnership with Maduro enables Hezbollah to operate in Venezuela. Iran gets to safely operate, through Hezbollah, in the West without prosecution, and Maduro and his officials get paid well,” he explained. “Ultimately, Iran uses and exploits Maduro, who benefits financially.” Both experts pointed to the complicity of the Venezuelan state as a critical enabler of this operation.

Under the leadership of Maduro and his predecessor Hugo Chávez, Venezuela has become a significant transshipment hub for Colombian cocaine. Townsend pointed out that there have been multiple indictments in the U.S. and Treasury OFAC designations linking senior government officials to the use of state infrastructure—such as ports, air bases, and military convoys—to facilitate large cocaine shipments. The Cartel of the Suns, composed of high-ranking military officers, is known to protect these shipments, while Hezbollah plays a key role in laundering the drug money.

Citrinowicz underscored Iran’s investment in Venezuelan power structures, noting that military cooperation is a significant aspect of this relationship. “The enhancement is illustrated by several aspects: first and foremost, the military cooperation, especially Iranian factories building UAVs for the Venezuelan army, and constant Quds Force flights from Iran through Africa toward Venezuela,” he stated. He added that Iran is also teaching Venezuela how to circumvent sanctions and has invested billions into its economy.

Experts agree that Washington’s most effective leverage lies in targeting the financial networks that support this operation. “We need to aggressively target and choke these financial networks,” Townsend urged. “The priority is to attack the financial and logistical networks, indict everyone we can, and pressure Maduro. If we can cut off the financial arteries, the cocaine won’t be as profitable.” Citrinowicz concurred, stating that weakening Maduro would also diminish Iran’s presence in Latin America, thereby reducing its ability to threaten U.S. interests.

For U.S. officials, Hezbollah’s narcotics empire in Venezuela is increasingly viewed as a direct threat to national security. The situation is no longer just a regional issue; it poses significant implications for safety at home.

Source: Original article

Venezuelan Military Jets Approach US Navy Ship, Pentagon Calls It Provocative

The Pentagon has condemned Venezuela’s recent military maneuvers as a “highly provocative move” after two Venezuelan aircraft approached a U.S. Navy vessel in international waters.

The U.S. Department of Defense confirmed on Thursday that two Venezuelan military aircraft flew near a U.S. Navy vessel operating in international waters. The Pentagon characterized the incident as a “highly provocative move,” coinciding with the Trump administration’s intensified efforts against narco-terrorism.

In a statement shared on social media platform X, the Defense Department stated, “Today, two Maduro regime military aircraft flew near a U.S. Navy vessel in international waters. This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter-narco-terror operations.” The statement further warned the Venezuelan cartel against any attempts to obstruct U.S. military operations aimed at countering narcotics and terrorism.

In response to the escalating situation, the Pentagon is deploying ten F-35 stealth fighter jets to Puerto Rico to support counter-narcotics operations in the Caribbean. This deployment underscores the U.S. commitment to combating drug trafficking and related threats in the region.

The Venezuelan military’s actions followed a significant U.S. Marine strike on Tuesday that targeted a vessel operated by drug cartels. The Trump administration reported that eleven members of the Tren de Aragua, a gang designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S., were killed in the operation. This strike marked a shift in U.S. strategy, moving from primarily seizure and apprehension operations to a more aggressive military approach.

During a visit to Ecuador on Thursday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the reclassification of two gangs as foreign terrorist organizations. He condemned the involvement of the Venezuelan leadership in drug trafficking, labeling Nicolás Maduro as an “indicted drug trafficker” and a “fugitive of American justice.”

Rubio emphasized the legal actions taken against Maduro, stating, “Maduro is indicted by a grand jury in the Southern District of New York. That means the Southern District of New York presented the evidence to a grand jury, and a grand jury indicted him.” He pointed out that a superseding indictment was unsealed approximately a year and a half ago, detailing Maduro’s alleged criminal activities.

Rubio also indicated that the U.S. is collaborating with allied nations to implement a tougher stance against drug cartels and international gang organizations. He remarked that “cooperative governments” would assist the U.S. in identifying drug traffickers, suggesting that extreme measures, including military action, could be necessary.

The recent developments highlight the ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela, particularly regarding drug trafficking and military posturing in the region. As the U.S. ramps up its counter-narcotics operations, the situation remains fluid and could escalate further.

Source: Original article

Trump Praises Florida’s Elimination of Vaccine Mandates as Strong Position

President Donald Trump praised Florida’s decision to eliminate vaccine mandates for students, describing it as a “tough stance” while emphasizing the importance of certain vaccines.

Former President Donald Trump expressed support for Florida’s recent move to eliminate all state vaccine mandates for students, calling it a “tough stance.” His comments came during a press briefing on Friday, where he highlighted the effectiveness of certain vaccines.

“I think we have to be very careful. You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The polio vaccine, I happen to think, is amazing,” Trump stated, referencing the historical significance of vaccines in preventing diseases. He also praised the COVID-19 vaccine developed during his administration, describing it as “amazing.”

Trump continued, “You have some vaccines that are so incredible, and I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don’t have to be vaccinated. It’s a very tough position … it’s a tough stance.” He emphasized that there are “vaccines that work,” asserting their importance in public health.

In a recent announcement, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and state Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo revealed plans to eliminate all vaccine mandates in the state. During a news conference, Ladapo compared vaccine requirements to slavery, stating, “All of them, every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and slavery.” He characterized vaccine mandates as “wrong” and “immoral.”

Ladapo indicated that the Florida Department of Health would repeal mandates under his authority, while additional legislative action would be necessary to address other requirements. Currently, Florida mandates vaccinations for students against diseases such as polio, diphtheria, measles, rubella, pertussis, mumps, and tetanus. However, parents have the option to request exemptions on religious grounds.

Across the United States, all states and Washington, D.C., require vaccinations for children to attend school. In recent years, there has been a noticeable decline in vaccination rates among children.

In a controversial statement, Ladapo referred to the COVID-19 vaccine as “poison,” following its removal from the recommended list for healthy children by the federal government under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He questioned the authority of government officials to dictate personal health choices, saying, “Who am I as a government or anyone else, who am I as a man standing here now, to tell you what you should put in your body?”

Ladapo further emphasized individual choice, stating, “You want to put whatever different vaccines in your body, God bless you. I hope you make an informed decision. You don’t want to put whatever vaccines in your body, God bless you. I hope you make an informed decision. That’s how it should be.”

Trump’s endorsement of Florida’s decision reflects a broader debate on vaccine mandates and personal freedom, as public health measures continue to evolve in response to changing circumstances.

Source: Original article

For Indian-American Sikhs in ICE Detention, Faith Offers Hope

Simran Singh’s weekly visits to the Mesa Verde ICE Detention Center provide Sikh detainees with essential articles of faith, fostering hope and connection amid their struggles for asylum in the U.S.

Every Thursday, 33-year-old insurance broker Simran Singh embarks on a mission from his home in Bakersfield, California. He fills his car with essential items, stopping at an Indian grocery store for Punjabi-language newspapers and then at a gurdwara to collect around 50 servings of prashad, a traditional sweet pudding made for devotees.

His destination is the Mesa Verde ICE Detention Center, a stark beige structure surrounded by metal fences topped with barbed wire. After checking in and receiving a visitor badge, Singh is escorted to the cafeteria, where he spends the next ninety minutes meeting with approximately sixty Sikh detainees. He distributes cloth dastaars, maalas (prayer beads), karas (metal bracelets), Nitnem Gutke (prayer books), and Punjabi newspapers, engaging in conversations that offer a sense of community and support.

In the midst of the despair surrounding asylum cases, transfers, and fears of deportation, the items Singh brings symbolize a glimmer of hope. “It is heartwarming to see,” Singh reflects. “Now they know that there is someone who knows they exist, that they’re not just a number in a facility.”

Singh’s initiative began in 2016, sparked by his curiosity while volunteering with a Sikh community organization to register voters at the gurdwara. With immigration a hot topic during Donald Trump’s first presidential campaign, he discovered the nearby detention center and decided to investigate. To his surprise, he found three Sikh detainees at Mesa Verde. After completing a volunteer course, he began visiting them regularly.

Over the next four years, Singh’s visits became a weekly routine, coinciding with a significant increase in the number of South Asian detainees, particularly Sikhs from India. Between 2016 and 2020, the number of Sikh detainees rose from three to 40, many detained immediately after crossing the border. This trend mirrored a rise in apprehensions of Indian nationals by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) during that period, peaking at 71,781 encounters in 2023.

Many of these individuals hail from Punjab, Haryana, and Gujarat, fleeing financial insecurity or political persecution. Their journeys to the U.S. often involve perilous travel by air, water, and foot, only to face detention upon arrival.

Language and cultural barriers further complicate the asylum process for South Asian immigrants. Fresno-based immigration attorney Deepak Singh Ahluwalia highlights the challenges posed by language discrepancies, noting that many Border Patrol officers lack the ability to communicate effectively with asylum-seekers. “The language barrier is huge, it’s immense,” he said. “In 10 years, I’ve met one CBP officer who spoke Punjabi!”

For Sikhs, the issue of their articles of faith, particularly turbans, has become contentious during border crossings. Harminder Singh, a 36-year-old Sikh truck driver, fled political persecution in Punjab in 2022. After a grueling four-month journey, he and his family were detained at the San Luis, Arizona border. Despite his pleas to keep his turban on, Border Patrol officers forced him to remove it, leading to a traumatic experience that left him feeling humiliated in front of his children.

After being separated from his family and suffering from physical distress, Harminder was released two days later, only to find himself without his turban. His experience is not isolated; reports indicate that at least 64 Sikh immigrants had their turbans confiscated at the Arizona border around August 2022. Following advocacy from civil rights groups, CBP issued guidance to prevent unnecessary confiscation of Sikh articles of faith, though reports have surfaced of continued issues.

Singh emphasizes the importance of providing detainees with their articles of faith, as many do not have access to them while in detention. The facility’s budget typically covers basic items like books and games, but often neglects the religious needs of detainees. To bridge this gap, Singh has relied on his network to source and deliver essential items.

He has successfully procured Nitnem Gutke, dastaars, karas, and maalas through various means, including donations from family members and local businesses. During his visits, he encourages detainees to share maalas with fellow inmates, fostering connections among individuals from diverse backgrounds.

In addition to delivering articles of faith, Singh has organized kirtan dewans—Sikh devotional concerts—at various ICE facilities, promoting cultural exchange and understanding among detainees. His efforts have expanded significantly, with Singh supplying thousands of religious items to 18 detention centers across multiple states since July 2025.

The COVID-19 pandemic temporarily halted Singh’s visits, but he resumed them in June 2025, witnessing a surge in detainee numbers as restrictions lifted. On a recent visit, he met with 65 South Asian detainees, the highest number he has encountered to date, with more than half identifying as Sikh.

Singh notes a troubling trend: many detainees are now being apprehended during routine ICE check-ins rather than immediately after crossing the border. “They don’t want to miss these visits, so ICE is having these immigrants walk into what ends up being a trap,” he explains.

For many detainees, Singh serves as their only connection to the outside world. Phone calls to family are prohibitively expensive, and the emotional toll of detention is profound. During his visits, detainees often share their stories of hardship and uncertainty, revealing the psychological strain of their circumstances.

Singh acknowledges the difficulty of not knowing the outcomes of the detainees he meets. “I just show up and either they’re going to be there or they’re not going to be there. I don’t get that closure or find out what happens once they’re gone,” he says.

As the number of detainees at the Mesa Verde Detention Center continues to rise, Singh remains committed to providing support and resources to those in need. “It’s a big morale booster,” he states. “They have a way to keep their identity in a place where everyone’s wearing the same clothes, waking up at the same time, following the same schedule, day in, day out for months and years at a time. It’s like putting a bandage on something that requires a major operation.”

Source: Original article

ISS Crew Member Pranks SpaceX Team During Arrival at Space Station

Russian cosmonaut Ivan Vagner greeted NASA’s Crew-10 astronauts with a playful alien mask during their arrival at the International Space Station on March 16, 2025.

In a lighthearted moment captured live, Russian cosmonaut Ivan Vagner welcomed the Crew-10 astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS) on March 16, 2025, by donning an alien mask. This amusing encounter occurred shortly after the astronauts’ SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule successfully docked at 12:04 a.m. EDT, approximately 29 hours after its launch from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

As the ISS crew prepared for the newcomers’ deboarding, Vagner floated around in the station wearing a mask, hoodie, pants, and socks, adding a touch of humor to the occasion. A NASA spokesperson described the moment as “lighthearted,” highlighting the camaraderie among the crew members.

NASA astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, along with JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) astronaut Takuya Onishi and Roscosmos cosmonaut Kirill Peskov, entered the ISS shortly after the hatches between the space station and the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft were opened at 1:35 a.m. EDT. This marked a significant moment for the Crew-10 team as they joined the Expedition 72 crew.

Following the hatch opening, Suni Williams rang the ship’s bell, signaling the arrival of the new astronauts. They were greeted with handshakes and hugs, further emphasizing the sense of community aboard the ISS. Williams expressed her excitement, stating, “It was a wonderful day. Great to see our friends arrive,” during a communication with Mission Control.

Williams and fellow astronaut Butch Wilmore are set to guide the new arrivals through the workings of the space station. Their mission is expected to last only one week, following a previous delay that left them in space longer than planned. This extended stay was due to complications that required NASA to return Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft empty.

As the Crew-10 astronauts settle in, Crew-9 commander Nick Hague and Russian cosmonaut Aleksandr Gorbunov are scheduled to depart the ISS on Wednesday, potentially splashing down off the coast of Florida as early as 4 a.m. EDT.

This playful encounter not only highlights the lighter side of life in space but also underscores the collaborative spirit among international astronauts aboard the ISS.

Source: Original article

Three Active Tuberculosis Cases Reported in Maine Amid Rising National Trends

Three active tuberculosis cases have been reported in Maine’s Greater Portland area, prompting health officials to test contacts of the infected patients as cases rise nationwide.

Health officials in Maine are investigating three active cases of tuberculosis (TB) in the Greater Portland area. The Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported these cases as TB continues to rise across the United States.

Lindsay Hammes, a spokesperson for the Maine CDC, confirmed that the agency is aware of the three active TB cases linked to the Greater Portland area and is currently conducting its standard response protocols. The Maine CDC is reaching out to individuals who may have come into contact with the infected patients to facilitate testing.

Hammes noted that each of the three cases appears to have been contracted from separate sources, highlighting the need for thorough contact tracing and testing.

While tuberculosis is not as contagious as illnesses such as the flu or COVID-19, it remains a significant public health concern. According to the World Health Organization, TB is the deadliest infectious disease globally, claiming the lives of over one million people each year.

This week, a high school student in Riverside County, California, also tested positive for an active case of TB. Officials reported that the student is receiving treatment and is optimistic about making a full recovery, as reported by KTLA-TV. Additionally, another active case was identified at a high school in Michigan, according to WWJ-TV.

After decades of decline, tuberculosis cases began to rise in 2021, following a significant drop in 2020. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention noted this trend in a report from 2022, and it has continued into the current year.

In Maine, the state CDC reported a total of 28 TB cases through the end of July 2023. However, officials emphasized that there is no outbreak at this time.

Not everyone infected with TB exhibits symptoms, but those with active cases may experience a persistent cough, which can include coughing up blood or sputum, as well as chest pain, fever, and fatigue. TB primarily targets the lungs but can also affect other organs. The disease spreads from person to person through the air, according to information from Johns Hopkins University.

Fortunately, tuberculosis is a treatable bacterial infection, and effective antibiotics are available to cure the disease.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the Maine CDC for further comments regarding the ongoing investigation and response efforts.

Source: Original article

Rare Sighting of Octopus Riding Shark Captured on Camera

The rare sighting of an octopus riding a shark off the coast of New Zealand has captivated scientists and marine enthusiasts alike.

In a remarkable encounter captured on video, an octopus was seen riding atop a mako shark off the coast of New Zealand. This unusual sighting, shared by researchers from the University of Auckland, has been dubbed a “sharktopus.” The footage showcases a Maori octopus perched on the head of the world’s fastest shark, known for its ability to swim at speeds of up to 46 mph.

The incident occurred in December 2023 while university researchers were investigating shark feeding frenzies in the Hauraki Gulf, near Kawau Island. During their exploration, they encountered a mako shark distinguished by an “orange patch” on its head. To document the moment, the researchers deployed a drone and a GoPro camera into the water, leading to the unforgettable sight of the octopus clinging to the shark’s head with its tentacles.

Professor Rochelle Constantine, a marine scientist at the University of Auckland, described the sighting as one of the strangest experiences of her career. “It was a mysterious sight indeed,” she noted, emphasizing that octopuses typically dwell on the seabed, while short-fin mako sharks prefer shallower waters.

After observing the scene for approximately ten minutes, the researchers decided to move on, leaving the fate of the “sharktopus” uncertain. Constantine speculated that the octopus might have been in for quite an adventure, considering the speed at which mako sharks can swim. “The octopus may have been in for quite the experience, since the world’s fastest shark species can reach 30 mph,” she remarked.

Initially, Constantine was unsure of what she was witnessing. “At first, I was like, ‘Is it a buoy? Is it entangled in fishing gear or had a big bite?’” she recalled. However, she quickly realized that both the shark and the octopus appeared unbothered by the encounter. “The shark seemed quite happy, and the octopus seemed quite happy. It was a very calm scene,” she stated.

This rare interaction between two marine species has sparked interest and curiosity among scientists and the public alike, highlighting the wonders of ocean life and the unexpected behaviors of its inhabitants.

According to Fox News, the footage has not only provided a glimpse into the unique relationship between these two creatures but also serves as a reminder of the mysteries that still exist beneath the waves.

Source: Original article

Spectacular Blue Spiral Light in Night Sky Likely From SpaceX Rocket

A stunning blue spiral light, likely from a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, illuminated the night sky over Europe, captivating viewers and sparking social media commentary.

A mesmerizing blue light graced the night skies over Europe on Monday, captivating onlookers and sparking intrigue across social media platforms. This mysterious spiraling phenomenon was likely caused by the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket booster as it fell back toward Earth.

Time-lapse footage captured from Croatia around 4 p.m. EST (9 p.m. local time) showcased the glowing spiral, which many commentators likened to a cosmic whirlpool or spiral galaxy. The full video, recorded at normal speed, lasts approximately six minutes, providing a stunning visual of the event.

The Met Office in the United Kingdom reported receiving numerous accounts of an “illuminated swirl in the sky.” Experts have indicated that the display was likely linked to the SpaceX rocket that launched from Cape Canaveral, Florida, at around 1:50 p.m. EST as part of the classified NROL-69 mission for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO).

“This is likely to be caused by the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, launched earlier today,” the Met Office stated on X. “The rocket’s frozen exhaust plume appears to be spinning in the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight, causing it to appear as a spiral in the sky.”

The phenomenon is often referred to as a “SpaceX spiral,” according to Space.com. These spirals typically occur when the upper stage of a Falcon 9 rocket separates from its first-stage booster. As the upper stage continues its journey into space, the lower stage descends back to Earth, releasing any remaining fuel. This fuel freezes almost instantly at high altitudes, and sunlight reflects off it, creating the striking glow observed in the sky.

Fox News Digital reached out to SpaceX for further comment but did not receive an immediate response. This spectacular display followed closely on the heels of a successful mission in which a SpaceX team, in collaboration with NASA, returned two stranded astronauts from space.

The captivating blue spiral not only highlighted the wonders of modern space exploration but also served as a reminder of the intricate processes involved in rocket launches and landings. As technology continues to advance, such breathtaking displays may become more common, further igniting public interest in space travel and exploration.

Source: Original article

Arundhati Roy’s Memoir Explores Challenges of Being Mother Mary’s Daughter

Arundhati Roy’s memoir, *Mother Mary Comes to Me*, explores the complexities of her relationship with her mother, revealing the profound impact of intergenerational trauma and familial violence.

In *Mother Mary Comes to Me*, Arundhati Roy delivers a stark and deeply emotional portrait of intergenerational trauma and familial violence, intimately recounting her life experiences with and without her mother.

Roy’s mother, Mary, was a formidable figure whose legacy extended beyond her role as a woman and educator. Mary Roy notably challenged the Travancore Christian Succession Act of 1916, which denied women in parts of Kerala equal inheritance rights, ultimately taking her fight to the Supreme Court and winning. With sheer determination, she founded Pallikoodam in Kottayam, Kerala, an innovative school celebrated for its progressive curriculum that emphasized arts, music, and athletics.

Arundhati describes her mother as someone who conducted herself with the edginess of a gangster, unleashing her genius, eccentricity, radical kindness, militant courage, and unpredictable temper on their insular Syrian Christian society. This vivid portrayal illustrates how Mary made space for all aspects of herself within their small world.

However, Mary Roy was also a tough and broken woman. Her father was abusive, inflicting violence on his children and even injuring his wife. To escape this environment, Mary married the first man who proposed to her. Arundhati’s father, described as a “Nothing Man” and an alcoholic, further complicated their lives. Following her separation from him, Mary took her young children, Arundhati and her brother Lalith Kumar Christopher Roy (LKC), back to Kerala, unable to endure her husband’s presence any longer.

Returning to Ayemenem, just outside Kottayam, shattered Arundhati’s childhood further. She faced the stigma of being fatherless while living among “decent people.” Yet, she gradually became part of the landscape, forming a connection with the river, the village, and the wilderness, often retreating home as seldom as possible.

Roy’s narrative captures the emotional dislocation and societal judgment that defined her upbringing, while also revealing her quiet rebellion against adversity. Arundhati and her brother became their mother’s only refuge, but this came with unpredictability and emotional turmoil. She learned to navigate her mother’s moods, constantly anticipating the next outburst. Her mother’s love was often entangled with emotional blackmail, as she would say, “I love you Double,” leveraging their father’s absence against them.

Mary’s rage toward men, shaped by her experiences with her father, husband, and brother, was often redirected toward her son. In a particularly harsh moment, she told him, “You’re ugly and stupid. If I were you, I’d kill myself.” As an adult, Arundhati recognized that her brother was the only man her mother could punish for the perceived sins of the world. This dynamic fostered distrust between the siblings, as their mother played them off against each other.

In the early chapters of *Mother Mary Comes to Me*, Roy sets the stage for a turbulent adulthood shaped by the inescapable legacy of intergenerational trauma. The question arises: who escapes such an inheritance without being scarred?

Like many children shaped by trauma, Arundhati oscillated between hating her mother and loving her unconditionally. She quickly learned that excelling academically was her ticket to her mother’s approval, a survival strategy that became essential. Mary encouraged her to write, even editing her work with ruthless precision. However, as Arundhati’s literary success grew, her mother began to resent the author she had become.

Reflecting on her experiences, Arundhati writes, “I learned early that the safest place can be the most dangerous. And that even when it isn’t, I make it so.” These lines encapsulate the lifelong battle she waged within herself—a struggle that resonates throughout her Booker Prize-winning novel, *The God of Small Things*, where characters grapple with trust and the fleeting nature of happiness.

When Arundhati won the Booker Prize, she immediately called her mother, who simply responded, “Well done, baby girl.” This moment, which should have been one of the happiest in her life, was overshadowed by the persistent elusiveness of a solid relationship with her mother. Arundhati reflects that this was “the price I paid for being Mother Mary’s daughter.”

Following Mary Roy’s death, Arundhati found herself inconsolable, unraveling under the weight of their complicated relationship. The daughter who had spent her life resisting her mother’s control was ultimately broken by her absence.

In contrast, her brother LKC navigated the aftermath with a quieter resilience. He grew into himself with confidence, marrying and becoming a father, pouring love into his child. While Arundhati carried her mother’s fire, LKC found peace and a way to live despite their shared past.

The memoir delves into the profound mystery of Arundhati’s love for her mother. She muses, “If I could understand myself better, I’d probably understand a lot more about the world and certainly about my country, in which so many people seem to revere their persecutors and appear grateful to be subjugated.”

This inner conflict has fueled her lifelong battle against both personal and societal injustices, as she passionately advocates for marginalized communities, championing causes such as Kashmiri independence, Maoist rebels, environmental movements like the Narmada project, and nuclear disarmament.

Through these struggles, Arundhati embodies her mother’s strength, refusing to be silenced and speaking for those who cannot. At sixteen, she ran away from home to Delhi, marking a pivotal moment in her life. She fled because she felt like an “address-illathu pillaru”—a child without an address, a proper family name, or a true sense of belonging. Some might argue that Arundhati has been running ever since, as even moments of solace in her work or relationships feel temporary and precarious.

*Mother Mary Comes to Me* serves as the origin story of one of India’s most polarizing authors—a woman shaped and often torn by the painful contradictions of her life. It narrates her journey between a progressive education and an insular, patriarchal family structure, juxtaposing her extraordinary success with the wounds of a childhood marked by violence, control, and emotional isolation. Ultimately, it reflects her fierce independence and her enduring quest for her mother’s love and approval.

In sharing this story, Arundhati may not only be reflecting on her past but also seeking to lay certain burdens to rest. Perhaps now, with her mother gone, she will finally find a measure of peace within herself.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Lawmaker Proposes Bill to Limit Military Deployments

Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi has introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act to limit presidential authority over military deployments without state approval.

WASHINGTON, DC — Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) has taken a significant step by introducing an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that seeks to restrict the president’s authority to deploy U.S. military forces or federalize the National Guard without obtaining approval from state officials.

This legislative measure, co-sponsored by Congresswoman Haley Stevens (D-MI), is a reintroduction of their previously proposed Stop Trump’s Abuse of Power Act. The amendment arises in response to actions taken by former President Donald Trump, who threatened to deploy the National Guard to Chicago without a request from Illinois officials. Additionally, Trump had previously sent active-duty forces to cities such as Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.

Krishnamoorthi expressed concerns regarding the implications of such unilateral military actions, describing them as an overreach of executive power that could undermine constitutional protections. “No president should be able to turn the U.S. military into their personal police force,” he stated. He further criticized Trump’s threats to militarize Chicago, suggesting that such moves would lead to “chaos and spectacle” rather than effectively addressing public safety issues.

The proposed amendment would mandate that a governor or state executive must formally request federal military support prior to any deployment of active-duty personnel or the federalization of the National Guard. Furthermore, it would prohibit the use of military troops in response to peaceful protests or demonstrations without the necessary state approval.

Currently, the amendment is under review by the House Rules Committee, which will determine whether it can advance to a floor vote as part of the NDAA.

As discussions around military authority and state rights continue, Krishnamoorthi’s initiative reflects a growing concern among lawmakers regarding the balance of power between federal and state governments, particularly in the context of public safety and civil liberties.

Source: Original article

Federal Appeals Court Upholds Illinois Gun Restrictions on Public Transit

A federal appeals court has upheld Illinois’ ban on carrying firearms on public transit, reversing a previous ruling that deemed the restrictions unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

A federal appeals court has affirmed Illinois’ prohibition on carrying firearms on public transit, overturning a lower court decision that found the gun restrictions unconstitutional. The Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued its ruling on Tuesday, with Judge Joshua Kolar writing for the majority. He stated that the ban “is comfortably situated in a centuries-old practice of limiting firearms in sensitive and crowded, confined places.”

Judge Kolar emphasized that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to self-defense but does not prevent lawmakers from enacting regulations that ensure public transportation systems remain free from accessible firearms. “We are asked whether the state may temporarily disarm its citizens as they travel in crowded and confined metal tubes unlike anything the Founders envisioned,” he noted. The court drew on historical regulatory traditions to determine that the ban does not violate the Second Amendment.

Last year, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled in favor of four plaintiffs who argued that the restrictions on carrying guns on public buses and trains were unconstitutional. This decision was influenced by a 2022 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, which established a new standard for assessing the constitutionality of gun restrictions. The district court found that there was no historical precedent to justify the transit gun restrictions.

However, the appeals court concluded that the ban is constitutionally valid. “Our concern is whether the law aligns with the nation’s tradition,” the majority opinion stated. “We hold that [the law] is constitutional because it comports with regulatory principles that originated in the Founding era and continue to the present.” The case, initiated by several Illinois gun owners and supported by gun rights organizations, is anticipated to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The plaintiffs contended that the transit restrictions contradicted the Supreme Court’s 2022 Bruen decision. Nonetheless, the Seventh Circuit maintained that the state had demonstrated a sufficient historical basis for designating crowded public transport as a “sensitive place.” The firearm ban on public transit was enacted in 2013, making Illinois the last state in the U.S. to permit concealed carry in public.

In addition to prohibiting firearms on buses and trains, the legislation also restricts gun possession in hospitals and other public areas. Judge Kolar, appointed by President Joe Biden, was joined in the majority opinion by Judge Kenneth Ripple, who was appointed by former President Ronald Reagan. Judge Amy St. Eve, selected by President Donald Trump, wrote a separate concurring opinion, addressing a complex jurisdictional question regarding how to evaluate claims of injury related to the inability to engage in protected activities.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source: Original article

Vineet Gupta Discusses Student Debt and the Future of Management Education

Vineet Gupta, founder of Ashoka University, emphasizes the urgent need for management education in India to adapt amid rising costs, declining job placements, and the impact of artificial intelligence.

In India’s dynamic higher education landscape, the management degree, once considered a gateway to career success and social prestige, is now facing significant challenges. Each year, tens of thousands of young Indians enroll in MBA programs, only to confront the harsh realities of escalating tuition costs, disappointing campus placements, and increasing student loan debt. Vineet Gupta, founder of Ashoka University and Plaksha University, asserts that “management education has to reinvent to remain relevant not only in India but all over the world.”

The rapid expansion of management education in India over the past decade was fueled by a surge in demand. Currently, there are approximately 3,900 management schools across the country, offering nearly 350,000 seats. However, the landscape is shifting dramatically. Reports indicate that around 65 business management colleges are expected to close in 2025, while many others are grappling with declining enrollment and uncertain futures.

The underlying issue is clear: the promise of an MBA is increasingly failing to align with actual outcomes. Many lesser-known institutions are burdened by outdated curricula, inexperienced faculty, and a significant disconnect from the realities of the business world. Consequently, “very few respectable companies participate in the course-end recruitment drives,” leaving students without job offers despite investing between ₹4 lakh and ₹30 lakh in their education.

A recent survey highlights a troubling trend: nearly 50% of MBA graduates in India struggle to find relevant employment within months of graduation, particularly those hailing from Tier 2 and Tier 3 institutes, according to an ASSOCHAM report from 2017. Many of these young graduates are now encumbered by substantial student loans and lack a clear path to repayment, raising concerns about the true return on investment (ROI) of their education.

Gupta’s observations reflect this shift in perspective: “At the postgraduate level, a lot of middle-class families take loans especially for professional degrees like engineering, management, and medicine, hence the expectation of ROI is high. If the focus of accreditation shifts to quality, many of our institutions will face problems in getting notified.” The result is a troubling scenario where aggressive expansion and lax regulation have left too many students paying for degrees that fail to deliver meaningful career opportunities.

As demand stagnates for graduates from lower-tier business schools, elite institutions like the Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) continue to attract a robust pool of applicants. However, industry expectations have evolved. Companies now seek business graduates who are not only knowledgeable but also adaptable, multidisciplinary, and capable of solving real-world problems creatively.

Moreover, the rise of technology and artificial intelligence is fundamentally altering the job market. A McKinsey Global Report indicates that approximately one-third of activities across 60% of all jobs are automatable. In India, AI and automation have already led to reduced hiring in repetitive roles such as back-office operations, data entry, customer support, and even entry-level HR screening. For instance, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) recently announced layoffs affecting over 12,000 employees, attributing the decision to AI-driven efficiencies in coding, testing, and IT support. Analysts warn that up to 500,000 jobs in the outsourcing sector may be at risk due to these technological advancements.

As these technologies proliferate, fresh graduates—particularly those trained for routine corporate functions—are finding fewer job opportunities available to them. “Conventional MBA programs train the wrong people in the wrong ways with the wrong consequences,” remarked a leading academic, a sentiment echoed by numerous business leaders who question whether current programs adequately prepare graduates for future challenges.

Gupta offers a vision for addressing these pressing issues, advocating for a comprehensive rethinking of how management education is structured, delivered, and evaluated. He emphasizes the need for a shift from input-based evaluation—focusing on the number of teachers and facilities—to output-based metrics that prioritize graduate employability, student learning gains, and career progression.

Furthermore, he suggests that programs should be co-created with industry partners to ensure real-world relevance. Gupta advocates for making experiential learning, capstone projects, and internships core components of each program, stating, “It brings in the whole element of learning by doing.”

In light of the inevitability of AI, universities must equip students to work alongside technology rather than compete with it. This includes integrating courses on data analytics, machine learning, digital transformation, and AI-driven decision-making into the MBA curriculum. For example, Delhi University’s partnership with Google Cloud now trains students in AI, cloud computing, and data analytics.

Gupta also underscores the importance of teaching quality and student well-being. Engaging pedagogy, top faculty, and campus environments that foster resilience and holistic development are essential for nurturing capable graduates.

Transparency in outcomes is another critical area Gupta highlights. He suggests that regulators should publish placement, salary, and ROI data for each institution, empowering students to make informed decisions about their education.

Finally, he encourages experimentation and the adoption of global best practices, citing the Ashoka and Plaksha models, which are grounded in philanthropy, interdisciplinarity, and global benchmarking as examples of how to build impactful institutions.

As the traditional ‘MBA factory’ model begins to fade, a more rigorous, student-centric, and future-ready system must emerge. This transformation requires not only the integration of real-world industry practices but also alignment with the technological changes reshaping the job market. Gupta asserts, “We need an expansion in both capacity and quality of our higher education. For management education to justify its cost and earn back student trust, it must prove through jobs, innovation, and leadership development that it remains relevant in a rapidly changing global economy. Until that happens, student debt without jobs will continue to shape and challenge the very purpose of the Indian MBA.”

Source: Original article

-+=