Trump Administration Criticizes UN Vote on Palestinian Statehood

The United States has condemned a recent U.N. General Assembly resolution supporting Palestinian statehood, labeling it a “gift to Hamas” and counterproductive to peace efforts.

The United States has strongly condemned a U.N. General Assembly resolution that supports the creation of a Palestinian state, which passed with a vote of 142 in favor and 10 against, calling it a “gift to Hamas.” The resolution was backed by a coalition led by Saudi Arabia and France, and it has sparked significant backlash from the Trump administration.

U.S. United Nations Counselor Morgan Ortagus expressed the administration’s disapproval following the vote, stating, “Make no mistake — this resolution is a gift to Hamas.” She emphasized that the United States would not participate in what she described as an “insult to the victims of Oct. 7,” referring to the recent violence in the region. Ortagus further asserted that the resolution undermines diplomatic efforts aimed at achieving peace and securing the release of hostages.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, a White House official reiterated President Trump’s stance, indicating that recognizing a Palestinian state would reward Hamas and hinder efforts to bring hostages home. “He doesn’t think they should be rewarded,” the official stated, reinforcing the administration’s position against the resolution.

The “New York Declaration,” proposed during a U.N. conference in July, aims to outline what its sponsors describe as an “irreversible” path toward Palestinian statehood. The declaration condemns Hamas for the attacks on October 7, demands the release of hostages, and calls for Hamas to relinquish control of Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority.

In Paris, the French Foreign Ministry hailed the resolution’s passage as a “historic vote,” reflecting the international community’s commitment to advancing a comprehensive roadmap for peace and security in the region. The ministry noted that the declaration embodies unprecedented support for principles such as an immediate ceasefire, the release of hostages, and the establishment of a viable, sovereign Palestinian state. It also confirmed that discussions would continue at a follow-up conference in New York on September 22, which will be attended by French President Emmanuel Macron.

Israel’s U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon criticized the vote, labeling it as “theater” and warning that the only beneficiaries would be Hamas. “When terrorists are the ones cheering, you are not advancing peace; you are advancing terror,” he stated, reflecting the concerns of many Israeli officials regarding the implications of the resolution.

Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and president of Human Rights Voices, described the declaration as “a direct threat to American national security” and an “unabashed attempt to destroy the Jewish state.” She expressed particular concern over the provisions related to the so-called right of return, which she argued could lead to a mass influx of Palestinians into Israel, potentially undermining the Jewish majority and self-determination.

Bayefsky criticized the resolution’s provisions regarding Hamas as “smoke and mirrors,” asserting that it undermines the Abraham Accords by restoring a Palestinian veto over regional peace initiatives. She called for a robust response from the United States to counter what she views as a dangerous precedent.

While the U.S. and nine other countries, including Argentina, Hungary, Israel, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, and Tonga, voted against the resolution, Bayefsky expressed disappointment with Germany’s support for the measure, describing it as “absolutely shocking.” She emphasized that undermining the necessity of Jewish self-determination is “abhorrent.”

On the diplomatic front, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced plans to visit Israel ahead of high-level U.N. meetings later this month, where countries such as France and Britain are expected to formally recognize Palestinian statehood. The developments in the U.N. and the international response to the resolution indicate a complex and evolving landscape in the pursuit of peace in the region.

Source: Original article

Lawmakers Respond to Kirk’s Assassination and Political Violence Concerns

Following the assassination of Charlie Kirk, lawmakers from both parties are raising alarms about the escalating violence in U.S. political discourse.

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, bipartisan concern has emerged among lawmakers regarding the deteriorating state of political discourse in the United States. The tragic event has intensified discussions about the alarming rise in political violence that has plagued the nation in recent months.

Kirk’s assassination marks a grim chapter in a series of violent incidents targeting high-profile political figures. This trend began in July 2024, when former President Donald Trump was shot while campaigning for a second term in Butler, Pennsylvania. Just months later, Trump faced another assassination attempt. In April, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro was the victim of an arson attack, and in June, two Minnesota lawmakers and their families were attacked, resulting in two fatalities.

The chilling impact of this violence has led some lawmakers to cancel public appearances due to fears for their safety. “We have a climate right now where people who are frankly unhinged… like the two guys who tried to shoot President Trump, one who did shoot him, the person – whoever it is – who killed Charlie, the person who went after the Minnesota lawmakers – these people are nuts,” Senator Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told Fox News Digital. “But they are egged on by a climate that says, ‘Hey, you know, it’s okay basically to go out and shoot your opponents because they’re really Hitler.’”

This sentiment was echoed by Democratic lawmakers, who expressed their own fears about the current political climate. “It’s really sad and just scary, you know, honestly, just how dire things have gotten in this country in terms of our political discourse,” said Senator Andy Kim, D-N.J. He noted a recent survey indicating that over 50% of Americans would label members of the opposing political party as “the enemy,” a notion he described as “terrifying” and “dangerous.”

Senator Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., emphasized the necessity of respectful political engagement, stating that for democracy to function, individuals must be able to “passionately share [their] viewpoints and do so knowing that we resolve our differences through advocacy and voting, not through violence.”

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., remarked on the implications of Kirk’s death for political discourse. “I don’t know what it says about political discourse, but it certainly says something about violence, and it has no business in political discourse. You can have a robust disagreement with people, but when it turns to violence, something’s gone badly wrong,” he said.

Kirk was known for his passionate yet respectful engagement with students across the political spectrum as part of Turning Point USA, the grassroots organization he co-founded in 2012. He frequently visited college campuses nationwide, hosting debates and “Prove Me Wrong” events, where students could challenge his views directly.

Representative Thomas Massie, R-Ky., reflected on the loss of Kirk, stating, “I mean, that’s the shame of this. Charlie Kirk was polite, he had a message, and he spread that message, and he engaged people to speak and debate, and then he lost his life for that. That’s the thing about this country, we have freedom of speech. Nobody should ever take out violence based on something somebody said.”

Representative Jonathan Jackson, D-Ill., urged for a collective reflection on the current political rhetoric, warning that “these violent words precede violent actions.” He emphasized the need for a change in tone to prevent further tragedies.

Hawley suggested a broader perspective might help mitigate the issue. “I’ll just say again, part of the way we stop it is we realize that there’s stuff in life that’s more important than politics,” he advised reporters.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has sparked urgent discussions among lawmakers about the need to address the rising tide of political violence and the rhetoric that fuels it. As the nation grapples with these issues, the hope remains that a return to civil discourse can be achieved.

Source: Original article

Fox News’ Eric Shawn Discusses Cancer and Respiratory Illness from 9/11 Dust

Fox News correspondent Eric Shawn reveals his cancer diagnosis linked to exposure from 9/11 toxic dust during a live report on the 24th anniversary of the attacks.

Fox News correspondent Eric Shawn has disclosed that he was diagnosed with cancer this year as a result of exposure to toxic dust from the September 11 attacks. His revelation came during a live segment on “Fox & Friends” commemorating the 24th anniversary of the tragic events.

Reporting from Lower Manhattan, where survivors, families, first responders, and public officials gathered to honor the nearly 3,000 lives lost, Shawn shared his personal battle with 9/11-related cancer. “I have two different diagnoses under the World Trade Center Program,” he stated, referring to the federal initiative that provides monitoring and treatment for those affected by the attacks in New York City, the Pentagon, and Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

Reflecting on the significance of the day, Shawn remarked, “It is hard to believe that it has been nearly a quarter of a century since that day, when radical Islamic terrorism attacked the very heart of our city and our country.” He emphasized that the ideology behind the attacks continues to pose a threat to the nation’s values and freedoms.

Shawn highlighted the ongoing tragedy stemming from the attacks, noting that while 2,977 people were killed on September 11, the number of individuals who have died from 9/11-related illnesses continues to rise due to the toxic dust released during the attacks. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately 48,000 people have reported 9/11-related cancers, with nearly 10,000 new diagnoses occurring in the past year alone.

Since the attacks, more than 3,700 first responders have died, including 2,300 who succumbed to cancer. The Fire Department of the City of New York has been particularly affected, with 409 of its members lost to post-9/11 illnesses.

For Shawn, these statistics resonate deeply, as he grapples with both respiratory issues and cancer linked to the attacks. However, he considers himself fortunate. “I think of all those who were killed that day and those who continue to suffer because of that philosophy — that is not diminished,” he said. “We have to condemn it. We have to despise it. You will never forget.”

Shawn also pointed out that the health impacts extend beyond first responders. “If you were below Canal Street, basically, you were exposed to the dust. I was here reporting on it. That’s what happened with me. I mean, I’m very, very lucky. I think of all those who are suffering much greater … I’ve lost a few friends from this, of course.”

His own diagnosis came years later, first manifesting as a bronchitis-related respiratory issue, followed by a cancer diagnosis this year. “Back then, I remember thinking, maybe in 20, 30 years later I’ll get something. Well, here it is, 24 years,” he reflected.

In closing, Shawn emphasized the importance of national unity in the face of such tragedies. “We’re all in this together. I mean, we are,” he stated. “We are all in it together.”

Source: Original article

Relative of 9/11 Firefighter Criticizes Mamdani for Slogan Silence

The cousin of a 9/11 firefighter criticized New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani for not condemning the slogan “globalize the intifada” during a recent anniversary ceremony.

The cousin of a firefighter who perished in the September 11 attacks took aim at New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani for his reluctance to denounce the controversial slogan “globalize the intifada.” This remark came during a memorial ceremony held in Manhattan on Thursday, where Mike Weinstein, 61, honored his cousin, Stephen Belson, a veteran firefighter who lost his life while attempting to rescue individuals trapped in the South Tower of the World Trade Center.

Weinstein urged all politicians to unequivocally renounce terror and violence. He warned that failing to do so, particularly by not condemning phrases like “globalize the intifada,” could lead to another tragedy akin to 9/11. “I know my cousin Steve and many, many others would agree with me when I say, let’s continue to press all politicians, including those who went home already, to firmly renounce terror and violence,” Weinstein stated. “When political candidates and public officials refuse to condemn global terror and phrases such as ‘globalize the intifada,’ they are inviting another 9/11, God forbid, and they continue to bring daily fear for all New Yorkers,” he added.

Weinstein’s passionate remarks underscored the urgency he feels regarding the political climate. “Enough. Enough is enough,” he continued. “Twenty-four years later, we need all political candidates, including every single potential future mayor — and you know who I’m talking about — of this great city to speak out against terror and unite as freedom-loving New Yorkers. God bless America, land of the free and home of the brave.”

The phrase “globalize the intifada” is widely recognized as an anti-Zionist slogan that advocates for international support of Palestinian resistance against Israel. However, it has been criticized for inciting violence against Israelis and Jews. Throughout his campaign for the Democratic Party’s mayoral nomination, which he won in June, Mamdani has refrained from directly condemning the slogan. Recently, he did indicate that he would “discourage” its use.

In a shift from his earlier stance, Mamdani suggested that discussions with Jewish leaders had influenced his perspective on the slogan’s implications. He acknowledged the disparity between the slogan’s intended message and its detrimental effects on many Jewish New Yorkers. Earlier this summer, Mamdani described the phrase as reflecting “a desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights.” However, he later clarified that it is “not language that I use,” amid growing backlash.

During an appearance on NBC, Mamdani emphasized the importance of using language that clearly conveys his intentions, stating, “The language that I use and the language that I will continue to use to lead this city is that which speaks clearly to my intent, which is an intent grounded in a belief in universal human rights.”

As the political landscape evolves, the discourse surrounding sensitive topics like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains contentious. Weinstein’s remarks serve as a reminder of the deep emotional scars left by the events of 9/11 and the ongoing challenges faced by New Yorkers in navigating these complex issues.

Source: Original article

U.S. Media Express Optimism as Modi and Trump Address Trade Tensions

The U.S. media expressed optimism on September 10 regarding the positive exchange of messages between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump, signaling potential resolution of trade tensions.

On September 10, the U.S. media reacted positively to the exchange of messages between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump, indicating a hopeful outlook for resolving ongoing trade issues, particularly concerning tariffs and trade barriers.

Fox Business reported on the resumption of trade talks, highlighting a “significant shift” in U.S.-India relations after months of heightened tensions. The article noted that the exchange of messages underscores both countries’ commitment to advancing negotiations, although it acknowledged that unresolved disputes in agriculture and energy continue to pose challenges.

In a similar vein, Bloomberg published an editorial titled “Don’t Let Tariffs Tank the US-India Relationship,” urging both nations to focus on their long-term interests. The piece emphasized the importance of maintaining strong ties with India, which it described as the world’s largest democracy and a vital partner in a critical region.

The editorial advised the Trump administration to continue supporting India, particularly in light of its strategic role within the “Quad” diplomatic group, which includes Japan and Australia. It argued that India can significantly contribute to diversifying supply chains, advancing technology, and upholding a rules-based international order in the face of pressures from China.

Bloomberg’s editorial cautioned against allowing trade disputes to undermine a carefully cultivated relationship. It noted that neither China nor Russia could provide the same level of investment, technology transfers, or access to advanced weaponry that the United States can offer. The article urged India to focus on preserving and enhancing its relationship with the U.S. through cooperation in areas such as semiconductors, quantum technology, and defense production, regardless of the status of trade negotiations.

While the editorial expressed hope for a resolution, it also acknowledged the unpredictable nature of political dynamics in Washington, stating that there is “no guarantee” of a deal. Nonetheless, it maintained that a successful resolution could yield significant benefits over time.

As both nations navigate these complex issues, the recent exchanges signal a mutual desire to improve relations and foster cooperation in various sectors, highlighting the importance of dialogue in addressing trade tensions.

Source: Original article

Diabetes Study Identifies Diagnosis Gap Impacting Millions of Americans

Nearly half of the 1.3 billion adults living with diabetes worldwide are undiagnosed, highlighting a significant public health crisis, particularly among young people and in low-income regions.

Researchers are sounding the alarm over a looming diabetes crisis, revealing that nearly half of the 1.3 billion adults affected by the disease are unaware of their condition. This lack of diagnosis leaves millions at risk for serious health complications.

A comprehensive study published in the journal The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology analyzed data from over 200 countries between 2000 and 2023. The research focused on how effectively health systems identify, treat, and manage diabetes, examining the rates of undiagnosed cases, untreated individuals, and those receiving suboptimal care.

According to the findings, approximately 44% of individuals aged 15 and older with diabetes remain undiagnosed. Tanya Freirich, a registered dietitian nutritionist based in North Carolina, emphasized the challenges in early detection. “Many people would not have signs or symptoms until their diabetes is very advanced, and many people are not going to the doctor often or at all for lab work,” she explained, although she was not involved in the study.

While about 91% of diagnosed patients receive medication, fewer than half manage to achieve optimal blood sugar control. This statistic indicates that only about one in five people globally are effectively managing their diabetes.

Young individuals are particularly vulnerable, facing significant long-term health risks such as heart disease, kidney failure, blindness, and nerve damage due to undiagnosed diabetes. The study highlights the urgent need for increased awareness and proactive health measures among younger populations.

Geographical factors also play a crucial role in diagnosis rates. In wealthier nations like the United States and Canada, diagnosis rates are higher, but challenges persist in the long-term management of the disease. Conversely, in lower-income regions, particularly in parts of sub-Saharan Africa, fewer than one in five individuals with diabetes are aware of their condition.

Lauryn Stafford, the lead author of the study and a researcher at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, stated that these alarming statistics should prompt action from governments and health systems worldwide. “By 2050, 1.3 billion people are expected to be living with diabetes, and if nearly half don’t know they have a serious and potentially deadly health condition, it could easily become a silent epidemic,” she warned in a press release.

The study also indicates that current treatment methods often fall short. Merely prescribing medication is insufficient for blood sugar control. Researchers advocate for a more holistic approach that includes monitoring, education, and lifestyle support to effectively manage diabetes.

For individuals with prediabetes, early intervention and moderate lifestyle changes can help return blood glucose levels to a normal range, potentially preventing or delaying the onset of type 2 diabetes, according to the American Diabetes Association.

Experts acknowledge the difficulty in accurately estimating the number of undiagnosed individuals. “Those are data points that are unable to be confirmed until diagnosed,” Freirich noted. “While I do not doubt the accuracy of the tool used in the study, there may be unknown factors that are not included in the model.”

Freirich recommends that everyone undergo regular health check-ups. She also highlights the importance of dietary choices, suggesting that increasing fiber intake through whole, unprocessed, plant-based foods, such as vegetables and nuts, along with maintaining consistent physical activity, can help reduce the risk of diabetes and assist in regulating blood sugar levels.

As the global diabetes crisis unfolds, the need for increased awareness, early diagnosis, and comprehensive management strategies has never been more critical.

Source: Original article

Trade Official’s Use of ‘Brahmins’ on Fox News Provokes Hindu Backlash

President Trump’s senior trade adviser, Peter Navarro, faced backlash from Hindu American groups after using the term “Brahmins” to criticize India’s elite during a Fox News interview.

Peter Navarro, a senior trade adviser to President Donald Trump, has ignited controversy and accusations of Hinduphobia following his use of the term “Brahmins” to describe India’s elite. This comment was made during a Fox News segment on August 31, where Navarro criticized India’s trade policies in light of the administration’s announcement of a new 50% tariff on Indian goods.

In his remarks, Navarro stated, “You have got Brahmins profiteering at the expense of the Indian people, and we want that to stop.” He further labeled New Delhi as “nothing but a laundromat for the Kremlin,” which added fuel to the fire of criticism directed at him.

The term “Brahmin” refers to the highest caste in the traditional Hindu social hierarchy, and its use in this context has drawn ire from the Hindu diaspora and communities in India. Many took to social media to express their outrage, with memes circulating that mocked Navarro’s apparent misunderstanding of Indian caste dynamics. This backlash prompted Hindu American organizations to call for Navarro’s immediate removal from his position.

Ajay Shah, the executive chair of the lobbying organization HinduPACT, condemned Navarro’s comments as “weaponized Hinduphobia.” He stated, “Dividing Hindus through colonial scripts doesn’t build relationships. It destroys them. People like Navarro have no place in American political life.”

Navarro’s comments coincided with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s significant visit to China, where he met with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping. The timing of the tariff announcement, which India has criticized as “unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,” has heightened tensions between the two nations.

American Hindus Against Defamation, a branch of HinduPACT, echoed the call for Navarro’s dismissal, labeling his remarks as a “reckless provocation” that threatens the dignity of over a billion Hindus worldwide. Their statement emphasized that using caste rhetoric to pressure a democratic ally is beneath the democratic dignity of the United States.

In Hindu tradition, Brahmins are associated with priestly and scholarly roles, historically responsible for conducting rituals and preserving sacred texts. Today, they make up approximately 4% to 5% of India’s population. The caste system, which is a birth-based social hierarchy, has been a topic of significant debate and contention, especially among the Indian diaspora in the United States.

In response to Navarro’s comments, Indian industrial CEO Harsh Goenka took to social media to clarify misconceptions about the Indian elite. He pointed out that many of India’s top business leaders, including those from major corporations like Tata and Reliance, do not belong to the Brahmin caste. Goenka stated, “But India’s soldiers, scientists, poets? Many were … Unlike some others who are trying to lobby for the Nobel prize, our Brahmins got their prize only through merit.”

Priyanka Chaturvedi, a member of India’s Shiv Sena political party, also criticized Navarro’s remarks on social media, describing them as “shameful and sinister.” She urged him to refrain from making comments that invoke caste identity to make political points.

In the United States, the term “Brahmin” has historically been used in different contexts. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, “Boston Brahmins” referred to an elite class of wealthy, white Protestant families who held significant cultural and political influence in New England.

Debates surrounding caste in modern America have been complex. Some argue that the focus on condemning caste has led to what they call “Hinduphobia,” suggesting that caste distinctions were exaggerated by colonial powers to divide Indians. Others maintain that casteism persists in various forms within American society, affecting opportunities and access for Indian Americans.

Research indicates that a significant majority of Indian immigrants to the U.S. belong to higher castes, with one study estimating that 90% of Indian Americans fall into this category. Prominent figures such as Sundar Pichai and Indra Nooyi, both CEOs, are part of the Tamil Brahmin community. Additionally, former Vice President Kamala Harris’s mother was also a member of this group.

A 2024 study by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace revealed that 32% of Indian American respondents did not identify with any caste, while 46% identified as “general or upper caste.” The study also found overwhelming support among Indian Americans for measures to formally outlaw caste discrimination.

Despite these statistics, advocates like Deepa Karthik, general secretary of HinduPACT, argue that caste rhetoric remains prevalent in America, particularly from those outside the community. “When someone like Navarro uses caste to shame India, it lands on Hindus here,” Karthik stated. “Kids get bullied. Workers get profiled. We get treated like we owe the world an apology for our heritage.”

This incident underscores the complexities surrounding discussions of caste and identity, particularly in the context of U.S.-India relations and the broader implications for the Hindu community in America.

Source: Original article

Democratic Senator Defends Against Accusations of Using Veterans as Props

Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia faces accusations from Republicans regarding his claims about a veterans housing bill, which he defends as a celebration of bipartisan efforts to assist veterans.

Senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat from Georgia, has dismissed Republican accusations that he misrepresented his involvement in the passage of a veterans housing bill. He questioned, “Is this the best they’ve got?” in response to the criticism.

The controversy centers around claims that Ossoff exaggerated his role in helping to pass legislation designed to prevent veterans from losing their homes. Some local media outlets inaccurately reported that Ossoff co-sponsored the bill, despite his lack of formal involvement.

Ossoff shared a video on social media last week featuring a news report that documented his press conference alongside local leaders and veterans groups. This event occurred shortly after President Donald Trump signed the VA Home Loan Program Reform Act. In the video caption, Ossoff stated that he “championed” the bipartisan bill aimed at protecting veterans.

However, a Fox News analysis revealed that Ossoff was not a co-sponsor of the legislation and did not vote on it. The bill was passed by unanimous consent in the House and through a voice vote in the Senate. Furthermore, Ossoff did not introduce any companion legislation in the Senate, nor was he present or active during the Senate floor discussions in July, according to a GOP source.

Republicans have criticized Ossoff’s messaging, arguing that he had “absolutely nothing” to do with the bill. When asked to clarify the discrepancies regarding his claims, Ossoff’s team defended his statements, asserting that he was merely celebrating the passage of a bipartisan bill that addressed a problem created by Republicans.

A spokesperson for Ossoff stated, “The Trump administration canceled the VASP program, and Sen. Ossoff sounded the alarm that its cancellation risked veteran homelessness, then celebrated the passage of a bipartisan bill to solve the problem. This is the best they’ve got?”

The VA Home Loan Reform Act is intended to replace the Veterans Affairs Servicing Purchase (VASP) program, which Ossoff previously criticized the Trump administration for terminating. Rep. Derrick Van Orden, a Republican from Wisconsin and the lead sponsor of the VA Home Loan Reform Act, described the VASP program as “fiscally irresponsible” and stated it was “endangering the entire VA home loan guarantee program.”

After Van Orden highlighted Ossoff’s social media posts claiming he “championed” the new veteran foreclosure bill, he accused the senator of telling a “bald-faced lie.” Other Republicans joined in the criticism, attacking Ossoff on social media platforms.

Rep. Buddy Carter, a Republican from Georgia, referred to Ossoff’s statements as “pathetic, disgusting lies,” suggesting that the senator was using veterans as props for political gain. He stated, “Congrats on showing Georgians you’re not above using veterans as props for your press stunts. Your empty suit gimmicks spit in the face of people you claim to serve.”

Senator Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, echoed similar sentiments, asserting that Ossoff had no involvement in the Republican-led efforts to assist veterans. He criticized Ossoff for attempting to take credit amid what he described as political desperation, stating, “Georgia deserves so much better.”

Van Orden reiterated that Ossoff had no role in the bill, emphasizing, “He did not even vote for it; it passed by unanimous consent. This disgusting and shameful behavior must stop. Veterans are not political props.”

The controversy surrounding Ossoff’s claims has led to multiple local news outlets reporting inaccuracies regarding his role in the Veterans Affairs legislation. For instance, WSB Radio in Atlanta published an article stating that a new law co-sponsored by Ossoff aimed to prevent veteran foreclosures. However, according to official records, Van Orden was the bill’s sole sponsor.

The bill was forwarded to the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee for approval before being passed by a voice vote in the Senate, where Ossoff is not a member.

Ossoff’s team announced that President Trump signed the Veterans Affairs Home Loan Program Reform Act into law on a Wednesday, describing it as bipartisan legislation that Ossoff co-sponsored and supported to assist veterans relying on VA loans. This assertion has been challenged by critics who argue that Ossoff’s claims are misleading.

As Ossoff prepares for his 2026 re-election campaign, he faces a competitive Republican field, including Derek Dooley, a former University of Tennessee football coach and ally of Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, as well as Republican Representatives Mike Collins and Buddy Carter.

As the political landscape evolves, the scrutiny surrounding Ossoff’s claims highlights the contentious nature of political discourse, particularly regarding issues affecting veterans.

Source: Original article

World Leaders Mourn Charlie Kirk Following Shocking Assassination in Utah

World leaders condemned political violence following the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk, a conservative media figure, during a speaking engagement at Utah Valley University.

International leaders expressed their outrage and sorrow on Wednesday after the tragic news broke that Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative media personality and co-founder of Turning Point USA, was shot and killed during a speaking event at Utah Valley University. Kirk, 31, was a husband and father of two.

Former President Donald Trump confirmed Kirk’s death in a social media post, revealing that he had been hospitalized after suffering a neck wound from the shooting.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was among the first world leaders to voice his grief over Kirk’s assassination. He stated on social media, “Charlie Kirk was murdered for speaking truth and defending freedom.” Netanyahu described Kirk as a “lion-hearted friend of Israel” who fought against falsehoods and stood firm for Judeo-Christian values. He noted that he had spoken with Kirk just two weeks prior and had invited him to Israel, lamenting that “sadly, that visit will not take place.” He concluded his tribute by acknowledging Kirk’s profound pride in America and his unwavering belief in free speech, stating, “Rest in peace, Charlie Kirk.”

Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni also expressed her condolences, stating on X that she was “shocked by the news of the killing of Charlie Kirk.” She characterized the act as “an atrocious murder, a deep wound for democracy and for those who believe in freedom.” Meloni extended her sympathies to Kirk’s family, loved ones, and the American conservative community.

Argentina’s President Javier Milei shared a personal photo with Kirk and former Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, offering condolences to Kirk’s family and to the young people worldwide who admired him. He called Kirk “a formidable disseminator of the ideas of freedom and staunch defender of the West,” labeling him a “victim of an atrocious murder” and attributing blame to the “left,” despite law enforcement officials not confirming the identity of the shooter. “The entire world lost an incredible human being,” Milei added.

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer also expressed his sorrow and condemned political violence in a post on X, stating, “My thoughts this evening are with the loved ones of Charlie Kirk.” He emphasized the heartbreak of a young family being robbed of a father and husband, asserting that “we must all be free to debate openly and freely without fear – there can be no justification for political violence.”

Numerous leaders across the U.K. echoed Starmer’s sentiments, including Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, who shared a photo with Kirk and remarked, “This is a very dark day for American democracy.” He expressed his deep sadness for Kirk, his wife, and children.

New Zealand’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Winston Peters, also condemned the rise of political violence and its threat to democracy. He stated on X, “It is tragic that we now live in a world where differences of opinion are met with a gun,” emphasizing that Kirk’s death should not merely be classified as “political violence” but rather as “an assassination.” Peters lamented the loss, noting that Kirk had traveled extensively to university campuses to provide open forums for debate, where all voices were welcomed. He warned that “the essence of democracy is under threat around the world and we must do everything we can to protect it.”

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has sparked a global conversation about the dangers of political violence and the importance of safeguarding democratic discourse.

Source: Original article

Congress President Kharge Meets Bihar Leaders to Discuss Poll Strategy

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi met with Bihar leaders to strategize for upcoming assembly polls, focusing on seat sharing and campaign preparations.

New Delhi: Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, accompanied by Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, convened a meeting with Bihar leaders on Tuesday to discuss preparations for the upcoming assembly elections in the state.

This meeting follows the recent conclusion of the Voter Adhikar Yatra, led by Rahul Gandhi, which the party claims has revitalized its workers and cadres across Bihar.

Chaired by Kharge, the meeting included prominent figures such as Screening Committee Chairman Ajay Maken, KC Venugopal, Bihar in-charge Krishna Allavaru, state unit chief Rajesh Kumar, and several party MPs, including Tariq Anwar, Mohammad Javed, Akhilesh Prasad Singh, Manoj Kumar, Ranjeet Ranjan, and CLP Mohammad Shekeel Ahmed Khan. NSUI in-charge Kanhaiya Kumar, Madan Mohan Jha, and Pappu Yadav were also in attendance.

Lasting over an hour, the discussions encompassed various topics, including seat sharing, the party’s electoral preparedness, and other pertinent issues.

Following the meeting, Allavaru addressed the media, stating that multiple issues were deliberated upon. He highlighted that discussions included seat sharing, the manifesto, and the campaign committee. Additionally, he mentioned that a future strategy had been established during the meeting.

A Congress source indicated that the party aims to maintain momentum in Bihar, with several programs featuring Rahul Gandhi and other senior leaders planned to commence from September 20. The source also noted that discussions regarding seat sharing would continue with alliance partners in the state, as Congress seeks to secure respectable seats, given the party’s historical significance in the region.

During his 16-day Voter Adhikar Yatra, Rahul Gandhi visited over 25 districts in Bihar, engaging with local communities and addressing key issues.

The polling for the 243-member assembly is scheduled for later this year. The ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA), comprising the BJP, JDU, HAM-S, and LJPR, is aiming to retain power, while the Mahagatbandhan, led by the RJD, Congress, VIP, and Left parties, is working to reclaim control.

During Rahul Gandhi’s yatra in Bihar, the Mahagatbandhan raised concerns regarding voter theft, highlighting the ongoing electoral challenges in the state.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Agenda and DOGE Cuts Impact Virginia Special Election

President Donald Trump’s policies, particularly job cuts and social issues, are central to the Virginia special election to fill a vacant House seat, with candidates debating their impacts on local voters.

In a special congressional election taking place in northern Virginia, President Donald Trump is a significant presence, despite not being on the ballot. The election, scheduled for Tuesday, will fill the seat left vacant by the late Democratic Representative Gerry Connolly, who passed away in June after a battle with cancer.

The race is primarily between Democratic nominee James Walkinshaw and Republican nominee Stewart Whitson. Key issues dominating the campaign include job cuts implemented by Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), crime and immigration policies, transgender rights, and calls for the release of Justice Department files related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Walkinshaw, who serves on the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors and previously worked as Connolly’s chief of staff, argues that Trump’s controversial agenda will significantly influence the election outcome in Virginia’s left-leaning 11th Congressional District. He stated that many voters in the area have been directly affected by the job cuts and layoffs associated with DOGE.

“Folks in Northern Virginia and Fairfax are feeling the impact of the Trump policies,” Walkinshaw said on the eve of the election. “Everybody in Fairfax knows someone who has lost their job because of DOGE or the Trump policies.” He emphasized that the district is experiencing the effects of these policies firsthand, which he believes will resonate with voters.

Whitson, an Army veteran and former FBI special agent, counters that Walkinshaw’s focus on opposing Trump is misguided. He argues that voters need solutions rather than empathy for those who have lost jobs. “The people in our district who have lost their job or who are worried about losing their job, they don’t need empathy. They need solutions,” Whitson said.

While Trump is not particularly popular in the district—having garnered only 31% of the vote in his re-election bid—Whitson maintains that Trump’s policies are rooted in common sense. He criticized Democrats for what he describes as “radical left” policies that are out of touch with the needs of the community.

Whitson also addressed the contentious issue of transgender rights in schools, asserting that he believes it is a civil right for girls to have access to safe spaces. “My opponent believes it is a civil right for men who identify as girls or women to go into our girls’ locker rooms and watch them change,” he charged. “I think this is all backwards.” He emphasized the importance of ensuring safety for all children in public facilities.

In response, Walkinshaw accused Whitson of fixating on a small percentage of students while neglecting the broader educational needs of all children in the district. “What I hear from folks in our community, and what I’m focused on, is how 100% of our kids can succeed in the classrooms,” he stated.

As the campaign progresses, Whitson has attempted to link Walkinshaw to Zohran Mamdani, a socialist candidate who recently won the Democratic mayoral nomination in New York City. “This is someone who has a history of supporting a lot of the exact same type of policies that Mamdani is supporting,” Whitson claimed, urging voters to consider the implications of such associations.

Walkinshaw dismissed the comparison, stating that voters in the 11th District are primarily concerned with local issues rather than political events in New York City. “Not a single voter has asked me about the New York mayor’s election,” he said. “I care what happens to folks right here in the 11th District.”

Another significant topic in the election is the push for the Justice Department to release files related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. Walkinshaw noted that this issue resonates across the political spectrum, with many voters questioning whether there has been a cover-up regarding the files during the Biden administration.

If elected, Walkinshaw has pledged to sign a discharge petition led by Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California and Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, which calls for the release of Epstein-related documents. “I absolutely will sign it,” he affirmed. “I think the American people deserve to know.” He expressed a desire to uncover any potential cover-ups by the Trump administration.

Whitson, however, criticized Walkinshaw for being late to address the issue, asserting that he had called for full disclosure of the Epstein files months ago. He accused Walkinshaw of politicizing the matter for personal gain, stating, “How long has this case been going on, and now he finally wants to reach on those records?”

The outcome of this special election could have significant implications for the balance of power in the House of Representatives, where Republicans currently hold a slim majority. With three Democratic seats vacant and one held by the GOP, a victory for Walkinshaw would further narrow the Republican majority in a district that has not elected a Republican in nearly two decades.

As voters prepare to cast their ballots, the impact of Trump’s policies and the candidates’ differing visions for the future of the district remain at the forefront of this critical election.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration May Restrict Iranian Diplomats’ Access to Costco Shopping

The Trump administration is considering visa restrictions for Iranian diplomats, potentially barring them from shopping at wholesale stores like Costco ahead of the U.N. General Assembly.

The Trump administration is evaluating new visa restrictions for several countries, including Iran, Sudan, Zimbabwe, and surprisingly, Brazil, as the U.N. General Assembly approaches later this month in New York. This move follows the recent denial of visas to Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas and is part of a broader crackdown on visa issuance by the administration.

According to an internal memo from the State Department reviewed by The Associated Press, these restrictions could be implemented before the General Assembly convenes on September 22. The inclusion of Brazil in this list is particularly unexpected, given the country’s traditional role of honor during the assembly, where it often delivers the first address on opening day.

As the administration considers these measures, it continues to review both current visa holders and those seeking entry for the U.N. meeting. One notable proposal would prevent Iranian diplomats, who already face stringent restrictions in New York, from shopping at wholesale retailers such as Costco and Sam’s Club without prior approval from the State Department.

Historically, Iranian diplomats have utilized these wholesale stores to purchase bulk goods that are not readily available in their home country, allowing them to ship items back at a lower cost. However, the potential shopping ban raises questions about the extent of the administration’s restrictions on foreign diplomats.

It remains uncertain when or if the shopping ban would be enacted. The memo indicated that the State Department is considering drafting rules that would allow it to impose conditions on wholesale club memberships for all foreign diplomats residing in the United States.

Additionally, it is unclear whether any restrictions would specifically affect Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva or other delegates attending the General Assembly. The Brazilian president’s attendance is significant, as he typically addresses the assembly first, followed by the U.S. president.

Relations between President Trump and President Lula have been strained, particularly following Lula’s prosecution of Trump ally Jair Bolsonaro, who is accused of leading an attempted coup. In contrast, Syria’s delegation is expected to face fewer restrictions after receiving a waiver from travel limits that have been in place for over a decade.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the State Department for further comment regarding these potential restrictions. The situation remains fluid as the administration weighs its options ahead of the upcoming assembly.

Source: Original article

Pakistani Intruder Captured at Indo-Pak Border During Infiltration Attempt

Border Security Force apprehends a Pakistani national attempting to infiltrate the Indo-Pak border in R.S. Pura, raising concerns about potential hostile operations.

In a significant security operation, the Border Security Force (BSF) successfully thwarted an infiltration attempt along the Indo-Pak international border in the R.S. Pura sector on Monday. The BSF apprehended a Pakistani national, identified as a resident of Sarkoda, during the incident near the Border Out Post (BOP) Octroi, which is directly opposite Pakistan’s BOP Inayat and falls under the jurisdiction of the 165th Battalion BSF.

According to security sources, alert BSF personnel observed a young man moving suspiciously toward the border fence from the Pakistani side. When confronted, the intruder continued to advance, prompting the BSF troops to apprehend him before he could breach the fence.

The individual was taken into custody, and initial interrogations indicated that he may be mentally unstable. Nonetheless, security agencies are treating the situation with the utmost seriousness. Sources have confirmed that the individual hails from Sarkoda, a location of strategic significance that was previously targeted by the Indian Air Force during Operation Sindoor.

This connection has led senior BSF officials and other security agencies to personally interrogate the suspect. Intelligence officials are investigating whether his movement was part of a reconnaissance mission, a test of border alertness, or linked to a broader infiltration plan. Given the strategic importance of Sarkoda and the heavy damage it sustained during Indian military operations, investigators are eager to determine whether the intruder acted independently or was sent with a specific mission.

“The line of questioning is aimed at uncovering whether this infiltration attempt had a deeper operational purpose or if it was merely a diversionary tactic,” a source familiar with the interrogation process stated.

Senior BSF officials have reiterated that no infiltration attempt can be taken lightly. “The border is under constant surveillance, and any misadventure from across will be dealt with firmly,” an officer emphasized.

This incident underscores Pakistan’s ongoing attempts to push individuals across the border, despite the heightened security measures and vigilant monitoring by Indian forces. The R.S. Pura, Arnia, and Samba sectors remain particularly sensitive, having witnessed past infiltration attempts and cross-border activities.

As investigations continue, intelligence agencies are working diligently to uncover the motives behind the infiltration and any potential links to hostile elements based in Pakistan.

Source: Original article

Mamdani Criticized for Using Children in Campaign Videos

New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani faces criticism for using children in campaign videos while advocating for a social media-free childhood.

Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old candidate for mayor of New York City, has come under fire for featuring elementary school children in his political campaign videos. This backlash follows his recent remarks about how fortunate he was to have a childhood free from the influence of social media.

The criticism intensified as Mamdani shared videos of two children endorsing his candidacy on Instagram, despite his previous comments highlighting the negative impact of social media on youth interactions. The timing of these posts coincided with the launch of a statewide cellphone ban in New York City schools, aimed at safeguarding student mental health.

On Thursday, Mamdani was seen outside I.S. 5 in Queens, where he praised the new cellphone restrictions while welcoming families for the first day of the school year. In an Instagram post, he reflected on his own childhood, contrasting it with the current digital landscape. He wrote, “I consider myself fortunate—when I was a student, it was before social media had cannibalized the way that kids interact with one another.” This post was accompanied by a message about “hope and new beginnings” as students returned to school.

However, just days later, Mamdani’s campaign accounts showcased videos of two young children speaking directly to him and Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts. In one clip, a young girl confidently endorsed Mamdani, while in another, a boy expressed his support with Warren present.

Comments from followers on these posts reflected a mix of admiration and criticism. One user remarked on the girl’s articulate nature despite her small stature, while others questioned the appropriateness of using children to promote a political agenda. “Why are you using kids to promote your political agenda?” one follower asked, echoing sentiments from others who felt that involving children in such a manner was unacceptable.

This controversy arises in the context of a broader conversation about the role of technology in children’s lives. New York Governor Kathy Hochul recently defended the cellphone ban, arguing that it would help reduce distractions, improve mental health, and protect children during emergencies by preventing location-sharing. The new law prohibits the use of smartphones and smartwatches in public schools during school hours, except for medical or educational purposes.

Mamdani, who gained attention after unseating a longtime incumbent in the Democratic primary, is campaigning on a platform of progressive policies, including a proposed $30 minimum wage and a rent freeze. His approach has resonated with some voters, but the recent backlash over his use of children in campaign materials raises questions about the consistency of his message.

As the mayoral election approaches, Mamdani’s campaign will need to navigate the complexities of public perception, especially regarding the use of children in political discourse. The juxtaposition of his advocacy for a social media-free childhood with his campaign strategies may challenge his credibility among voters.

Fox News Digital reached out to Mamdani for comment regarding the criticism but has not yet received a response.

Source: Original article

A Call for Truth and Accountability in North Hollywood’s Indian-American Community

Gurdial Singh, brother of Harpal Singh, calls for community support and accountability following a violent assault that left Harpal in critical condition in North Hollywood.

On a recent Tuesday afternoon, Gurdial Singh ji reached out to share distressing news regarding his brother, Harpal Singh ji, who was violently assaulted in the parking lot of a 7-11 in North Hollywood. This incident occurred just a short distance from the local Gurdwara where Harpal had been staying.

The call was in relation to a preliminary hearing scheduled for the following day. Gurdial ji informed me that the defendant would be present, and the District Attorney would outline the charges against him. He was rallying local sangat members to attend the hearing as a show of support for his family. However, I was taken aback when the conversation shifted from the hearing details to food.

Gurdial ji expressed his desire to ensure that no one attending the hearing would go hungry. He planned to bring paronthey (stuffed or layered pan-fried flatbread) and daahi (yogurt) and asked if he should also bring sabji (vegetables). Given the personal tragedy his family was enduring, I found it remarkable that his thoughts were focused on the well-being of others. Yet, having gotten to know the family over the past few weeks, I should not have been surprised.

For several weeks, I have been in contact with Gurdial Singh ji and his family regarding the assault. Like many others, I was deeply affected by the video showing Harpal Singh ji with blood streaming down his face, a clear indication of the brutal beating he had suffered. Although I did not know Harpal Singh ji personally, his composed demeanor, sitting cross-legged in the midst of such chaos, conveyed a sense of quiet strength and resilience in the face of senseless violence.

As the Executive Director of SALDEF and a resident of North Hollywood, I am familiar with the area where the assault took place. My husband works nearby, and we both have engaged in conversations with neighbors and members of the sangat about Harpal Singh and the broader North Hollywood community. Through these discussions, a vivid picture of Harpal Singh ji emerges.

Harpal Singh ji was a devout Gursikh who dedicated himself to serving both his sangat and the wider North Hollywood community. Community members fondly recall his acts of kindness, such as feeding birds, providing meals to the needy, and assisting those in distress. Many remember seeing him on his daily walks, embodying the values he lived by.

Harpal Singh’s family exemplifies these same values. Conversations with the Bhai Sahibs at the North Hollywood Gurdwara revealed that Gurdial Singh ji often arrives as early as 4 a.m. to perform seva (selfless service). Therefore, it was not surprising that, just a day before the hearing—when the family would confront the man accused of brutally attacking their loved one—their focus remained on the community.

Currently, the case is under investigation by the LAPD. The preliminary hearing initially scheduled for August 27 was postponed to September 2, when evidence will be presented by the District Attorney’s office.

Despite Harpal Singh ji remaining in critical condition and unable to advocate for himself, the LAPD Chief of Police has publicly characterized the attack as a “property dispute.” This statement has raised concerns within the community, as it seems not only premature but also inconsistent with the Harpal Singh ji that many have come to know. Unless there are witnesses who can clarify the events leading up to the assault or evidence to support this claim, the facts surrounding the incident remain unclear. Our community deserves to know the truth about what transpired that afternoon. Harpal Singh’s family deserves accountability, and our sangat, which has shown remarkable grace and resilience in the face of violence, deserves a legal system that respects their dignity rather than dismisses their pain.

As we navigate this imperfect legal system, my sincere hope is that the eventual verdict will reflect the reality of the situation and that Harpal Singh’s family, along with our community, will receive the answers we urgently seek.

Above all, we demand the truth regarding what happened to Harpal Singh ji on the afternoon of August 4, 2025, in North Hollywood, CA.

Source: Original article

Democrats Criticize Trump’s ‘War’ Threats Against U.S. Cities

Democrats are condemning President Trump’s recent social media post that suggested military action and deportations in Chicago, calling it an inappropriate threat against U.S. cities.

Democrats across the United States are voicing strong criticism of President Donald Trump following a controversial social media post that appeared to threaten Chicago with military intervention and deportations. The post, shared on Truth Social, featured an AI-generated image of Trump styled as Robert Duvall’s character from the iconic Vietnam War film “Apocalypse Now.” The image was accompanied by the phrase “Chipocalypse Now” and a play on a famous quote from the film: “I love the smell of deportations in the morning.”

In the post, Trump stated, “Chicago about to find out why it’s called the Department of WAR,” referencing his recent executive order that renamed the Department of Defense to the Department of War. This provocative message has sparked outrage among local and state leaders, particularly as discussions about deploying the National Guard to address crime in Chicago have intensified.

California Governor Gavin Newsom was among the first to respond, condemning Trump for using military personnel as “political pawns.” He urged Americans not to become desensitized to such threats, stating, “The President of the United States is deploying the military onto US streets and using our troops like political pawns.” Newsom’s comments reflect a broader concern among Democrats regarding the militarization of domestic issues.

Illinois Senators Tammy Duckworth and Dick Durbin also expressed their disapproval of Trump’s remarks. Duckworth, a combat veteran and retired Army National Guard lieutenant colonel, asserted, “No Donald, Chicago is not your war zone.” Durbin echoed her sentiments, criticizing Trump for diverting attention from pressing national issues such as job reports and public health crises. He described the notion of deploying troops to Chicago as “disgusting” and an embarrassment for the nation.

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker joined the chorus of criticism, labeling Trump’s threats as a serious matter. “The President of the United States is threatening to go to war with an American city,” Pritzker wrote. “This is not a joke. This is not normal. Donald Trump isn’t a strongman; he’s a scared man. Illinois won’t be intimidated by a wannabe dictator.”

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has also been vocal in his opposition to Trump’s comments. He highlighted recent data indicating a decline in violent crime in the city, with homicides and robberies decreasing by over 30% and shootings dropping by nearly 40%. Johnson remarked, “The President’s threats are beneath the honor of our nation, but the reality is that he wants to occupy our city and break our Constitution.” He emphasized the need to protect democracy from what he described as authoritarianism.

The backlash against Trump’s post underscores the growing tension between the federal government and local authorities regarding crime and public safety. As discussions about the potential deployment of the National Guard continue, Illinois leaders remain firm in their stance against what they perceive as unwarranted military threats against American cities.

According to Fox News, the situation continues to evolve as local leaders prepare to respond to any federal actions that may arise.

Source: Original article

Hezbollah and Iran Exploit Venezuela’s Drug Trade for Funding

Hezbollah and Iran have established a cocaine cash machine in Venezuela, which not only supports Maduro’s regime but also fuels global terror networks, according to experts.

Hezbollah and Iran have developed a sophisticated cocaine cash operation in Venezuela, which serves to bolster Nicolás Maduro’s regime while simultaneously funding terror networks worldwide. Recent U.S. military actions in the Caribbean are viewed by experts as part of a larger strategy to dismantle this growing narco empire.

U.S. officials have identified the Tren de Aragua gang as a key player in this operation, closely collaborating with the Cartel of the Suns, a network of Venezuelan military elites accused of cocaine trafficking in partnership with Hezbollah. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly emphasized the Trump administration’s commitment to countering Iran’s terrorist proxies, stating, “President Trump has taken numerous actions to curtail Iran’s terrorist proxies like Hezbollah, such as sanctioning senior officials and financial facilitators.” She added that the administration is determined to hold accountable any terrorist group that threatens U.S. national security through narcotics smuggling.

Brian Townsend, a retired DEA special agent, described recent U.S. actions as a “decisive blow against narco-terrorists.” He noted that while Hezbollah’s involvement is often hidden from view, it is crucial to the operation. “They don’t get their hands dirty. Instead, they launder and provide networks to help cartels send money through the Middle East,” he explained. Townsend added that Hezbollah takes a cut from the drug trade, which in turn funds their operations in the Middle East.

Dani Citrinowicz, a senior fellow at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies, highlighted Hezbollah’s reliance on the Lebanese diaspora in the region. “Most of the Shia diaspora, at least in Central and South America, is Lebanese,” he told Fox News Digital. “Hezbollah is the connector between the diaspora and Iran.” He elaborated on how the group utilizes family connections, language, and community institutions to strengthen its influence across Latin America. Through these networks, Hezbollah can engage with local cartels, facilitate drug sales, and channel profits back to Lebanon through complex schemes.

Citrinowicz emphasized that Hezbollah’s role as a connector is vital to Iran’s strategy in the Western Hemisphere. “The connection starts and ends with enmity towards the West in general, specifically to the United States,” he stated. He further asserted that as long as Maduro remains in power, Iran will maintain its foothold in the region. Conversely, if Maduro were to be ousted, Iran would lose its most significant stronghold in Latin America.

Townsend noted that the partnership between Iran and Maduro is mutually beneficial. “Iran’s partnership with Maduro enables Hezbollah to operate in Venezuela. Iran gets to safely operate, through Hezbollah, in the West without prosecution, and Maduro and his officials get paid well,” he explained. “Ultimately, Iran uses and exploits Maduro, who benefits financially.” Both experts pointed to the complicity of the Venezuelan state as a critical enabler of this operation.

Under the leadership of Maduro and his predecessor Hugo Chávez, Venezuela has become a significant transshipment hub for Colombian cocaine. Townsend pointed out that there have been multiple indictments in the U.S. and Treasury OFAC designations linking senior government officials to the use of state infrastructure—such as ports, air bases, and military convoys—to facilitate large cocaine shipments. The Cartel of the Suns, composed of high-ranking military officers, is known to protect these shipments, while Hezbollah plays a key role in laundering the drug money.

Citrinowicz underscored Iran’s investment in Venezuelan power structures, noting that military cooperation is a significant aspect of this relationship. “The enhancement is illustrated by several aspects: first and foremost, the military cooperation, especially Iranian factories building UAVs for the Venezuelan army, and constant Quds Force flights from Iran through Africa toward Venezuela,” he stated. He added that Iran is also teaching Venezuela how to circumvent sanctions and has invested billions into its economy.

Experts agree that Washington’s most effective leverage lies in targeting the financial networks that support this operation. “We need to aggressively target and choke these financial networks,” Townsend urged. “The priority is to attack the financial and logistical networks, indict everyone we can, and pressure Maduro. If we can cut off the financial arteries, the cocaine won’t be as profitable.” Citrinowicz concurred, stating that weakening Maduro would also diminish Iran’s presence in Latin America, thereby reducing its ability to threaten U.S. interests.

For U.S. officials, Hezbollah’s narcotics empire in Venezuela is increasingly viewed as a direct threat to national security. The situation is no longer just a regional issue; it poses significant implications for safety at home.

Source: Original article

Venezuelan Military Jets Approach US Navy Ship, Pentagon Calls It Provocative

The Pentagon has condemned Venezuela’s recent military maneuvers as a “highly provocative move” after two Venezuelan aircraft approached a U.S. Navy vessel in international waters.

The U.S. Department of Defense confirmed on Thursday that two Venezuelan military aircraft flew near a U.S. Navy vessel operating in international waters. The Pentagon characterized the incident as a “highly provocative move,” coinciding with the Trump administration’s intensified efforts against narco-terrorism.

In a statement shared on social media platform X, the Defense Department stated, “Today, two Maduro regime military aircraft flew near a U.S. Navy vessel in international waters. This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter-narco-terror operations.” The statement further warned the Venezuelan cartel against any attempts to obstruct U.S. military operations aimed at countering narcotics and terrorism.

In response to the escalating situation, the Pentagon is deploying ten F-35 stealth fighter jets to Puerto Rico to support counter-narcotics operations in the Caribbean. This deployment underscores the U.S. commitment to combating drug trafficking and related threats in the region.

The Venezuelan military’s actions followed a significant U.S. Marine strike on Tuesday that targeted a vessel operated by drug cartels. The Trump administration reported that eleven members of the Tren de Aragua, a gang designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S., were killed in the operation. This strike marked a shift in U.S. strategy, moving from primarily seizure and apprehension operations to a more aggressive military approach.

During a visit to Ecuador on Thursday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the reclassification of two gangs as foreign terrorist organizations. He condemned the involvement of the Venezuelan leadership in drug trafficking, labeling Nicolás Maduro as an “indicted drug trafficker” and a “fugitive of American justice.”

Rubio emphasized the legal actions taken against Maduro, stating, “Maduro is indicted by a grand jury in the Southern District of New York. That means the Southern District of New York presented the evidence to a grand jury, and a grand jury indicted him.” He pointed out that a superseding indictment was unsealed approximately a year and a half ago, detailing Maduro’s alleged criminal activities.

Rubio also indicated that the U.S. is collaborating with allied nations to implement a tougher stance against drug cartels and international gang organizations. He remarked that “cooperative governments” would assist the U.S. in identifying drug traffickers, suggesting that extreme measures, including military action, could be necessary.

The recent developments highlight the ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela, particularly regarding drug trafficking and military posturing in the region. As the U.S. ramps up its counter-narcotics operations, the situation remains fluid and could escalate further.

Source: Original article

Trump Praises Florida’s Elimination of Vaccine Mandates as Strong Position

President Donald Trump praised Florida’s decision to eliminate vaccine mandates for students, describing it as a “tough stance” while emphasizing the importance of certain vaccines.

Former President Donald Trump expressed support for Florida’s recent move to eliminate all state vaccine mandates for students, calling it a “tough stance.” His comments came during a press briefing on Friday, where he highlighted the effectiveness of certain vaccines.

“I think we have to be very careful. You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The polio vaccine, I happen to think, is amazing,” Trump stated, referencing the historical significance of vaccines in preventing diseases. He also praised the COVID-19 vaccine developed during his administration, describing it as “amazing.”

Trump continued, “You have some vaccines that are so incredible, and I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don’t have to be vaccinated. It’s a very tough position … it’s a tough stance.” He emphasized that there are “vaccines that work,” asserting their importance in public health.

In a recent announcement, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and state Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo revealed plans to eliminate all vaccine mandates in the state. During a news conference, Ladapo compared vaccine requirements to slavery, stating, “All of them, every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and slavery.” He characterized vaccine mandates as “wrong” and “immoral.”

Ladapo indicated that the Florida Department of Health would repeal mandates under his authority, while additional legislative action would be necessary to address other requirements. Currently, Florida mandates vaccinations for students against diseases such as polio, diphtheria, measles, rubella, pertussis, mumps, and tetanus. However, parents have the option to request exemptions on religious grounds.

Across the United States, all states and Washington, D.C., require vaccinations for children to attend school. In recent years, there has been a noticeable decline in vaccination rates among children.

In a controversial statement, Ladapo referred to the COVID-19 vaccine as “poison,” following its removal from the recommended list for healthy children by the federal government under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He questioned the authority of government officials to dictate personal health choices, saying, “Who am I as a government or anyone else, who am I as a man standing here now, to tell you what you should put in your body?”

Ladapo further emphasized individual choice, stating, “You want to put whatever different vaccines in your body, God bless you. I hope you make an informed decision. You don’t want to put whatever vaccines in your body, God bless you. I hope you make an informed decision. That’s how it should be.”

Trump’s endorsement of Florida’s decision reflects a broader debate on vaccine mandates and personal freedom, as public health measures continue to evolve in response to changing circumstances.

Source: Original article

For Indian-American Sikhs in ICE Detention, Faith Offers Hope

Simran Singh’s weekly visits to the Mesa Verde ICE Detention Center provide Sikh detainees with essential articles of faith, fostering hope and connection amid their struggles for asylum in the U.S.

Every Thursday, 33-year-old insurance broker Simran Singh embarks on a mission from his home in Bakersfield, California. He fills his car with essential items, stopping at an Indian grocery store for Punjabi-language newspapers and then at a gurdwara to collect around 50 servings of prashad, a traditional sweet pudding made for devotees.

His destination is the Mesa Verde ICE Detention Center, a stark beige structure surrounded by metal fences topped with barbed wire. After checking in and receiving a visitor badge, Singh is escorted to the cafeteria, where he spends the next ninety minutes meeting with approximately sixty Sikh detainees. He distributes cloth dastaars, maalas (prayer beads), karas (metal bracelets), Nitnem Gutke (prayer books), and Punjabi newspapers, engaging in conversations that offer a sense of community and support.

In the midst of the despair surrounding asylum cases, transfers, and fears of deportation, the items Singh brings symbolize a glimmer of hope. “It is heartwarming to see,” Singh reflects. “Now they know that there is someone who knows they exist, that they’re not just a number in a facility.”

Singh’s initiative began in 2016, sparked by his curiosity while volunteering with a Sikh community organization to register voters at the gurdwara. With immigration a hot topic during Donald Trump’s first presidential campaign, he discovered the nearby detention center and decided to investigate. To his surprise, he found three Sikh detainees at Mesa Verde. After completing a volunteer course, he began visiting them regularly.

Over the next four years, Singh’s visits became a weekly routine, coinciding with a significant increase in the number of South Asian detainees, particularly Sikhs from India. Between 2016 and 2020, the number of Sikh detainees rose from three to 40, many detained immediately after crossing the border. This trend mirrored a rise in apprehensions of Indian nationals by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) during that period, peaking at 71,781 encounters in 2023.

Many of these individuals hail from Punjab, Haryana, and Gujarat, fleeing financial insecurity or political persecution. Their journeys to the U.S. often involve perilous travel by air, water, and foot, only to face detention upon arrival.

Language and cultural barriers further complicate the asylum process for South Asian immigrants. Fresno-based immigration attorney Deepak Singh Ahluwalia highlights the challenges posed by language discrepancies, noting that many Border Patrol officers lack the ability to communicate effectively with asylum-seekers. “The language barrier is huge, it’s immense,” he said. “In 10 years, I’ve met one CBP officer who spoke Punjabi!”

For Sikhs, the issue of their articles of faith, particularly turbans, has become contentious during border crossings. Harminder Singh, a 36-year-old Sikh truck driver, fled political persecution in Punjab in 2022. After a grueling four-month journey, he and his family were detained at the San Luis, Arizona border. Despite his pleas to keep his turban on, Border Patrol officers forced him to remove it, leading to a traumatic experience that left him feeling humiliated in front of his children.

After being separated from his family and suffering from physical distress, Harminder was released two days later, only to find himself without his turban. His experience is not isolated; reports indicate that at least 64 Sikh immigrants had their turbans confiscated at the Arizona border around August 2022. Following advocacy from civil rights groups, CBP issued guidance to prevent unnecessary confiscation of Sikh articles of faith, though reports have surfaced of continued issues.

Singh emphasizes the importance of providing detainees with their articles of faith, as many do not have access to them while in detention. The facility’s budget typically covers basic items like books and games, but often neglects the religious needs of detainees. To bridge this gap, Singh has relied on his network to source and deliver essential items.

He has successfully procured Nitnem Gutke, dastaars, karas, and maalas through various means, including donations from family members and local businesses. During his visits, he encourages detainees to share maalas with fellow inmates, fostering connections among individuals from diverse backgrounds.

In addition to delivering articles of faith, Singh has organized kirtan dewans—Sikh devotional concerts—at various ICE facilities, promoting cultural exchange and understanding among detainees. His efforts have expanded significantly, with Singh supplying thousands of religious items to 18 detention centers across multiple states since July 2025.

The COVID-19 pandemic temporarily halted Singh’s visits, but he resumed them in June 2025, witnessing a surge in detainee numbers as restrictions lifted. On a recent visit, he met with 65 South Asian detainees, the highest number he has encountered to date, with more than half identifying as Sikh.

Singh notes a troubling trend: many detainees are now being apprehended during routine ICE check-ins rather than immediately after crossing the border. “They don’t want to miss these visits, so ICE is having these immigrants walk into what ends up being a trap,” he explains.

For many detainees, Singh serves as their only connection to the outside world. Phone calls to family are prohibitively expensive, and the emotional toll of detention is profound. During his visits, detainees often share their stories of hardship and uncertainty, revealing the psychological strain of their circumstances.

Singh acknowledges the difficulty of not knowing the outcomes of the detainees he meets. “I just show up and either they’re going to be there or they’re not going to be there. I don’t get that closure or find out what happens once they’re gone,” he says.

As the number of detainees at the Mesa Verde Detention Center continues to rise, Singh remains committed to providing support and resources to those in need. “It’s a big morale booster,” he states. “They have a way to keep their identity in a place where everyone’s wearing the same clothes, waking up at the same time, following the same schedule, day in, day out for months and years at a time. It’s like putting a bandage on something that requires a major operation.”

Source: Original article

ISS Crew Member Pranks SpaceX Team During Arrival at Space Station

Russian cosmonaut Ivan Vagner greeted NASA’s Crew-10 astronauts with a playful alien mask during their arrival at the International Space Station on March 16, 2025.

In a lighthearted moment captured live, Russian cosmonaut Ivan Vagner welcomed the Crew-10 astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS) on March 16, 2025, by donning an alien mask. This amusing encounter occurred shortly after the astronauts’ SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule successfully docked at 12:04 a.m. EDT, approximately 29 hours after its launch from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

As the ISS crew prepared for the newcomers’ deboarding, Vagner floated around in the station wearing a mask, hoodie, pants, and socks, adding a touch of humor to the occasion. A NASA spokesperson described the moment as “lighthearted,” highlighting the camaraderie among the crew members.

NASA astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, along with JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) astronaut Takuya Onishi and Roscosmos cosmonaut Kirill Peskov, entered the ISS shortly after the hatches between the space station and the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft were opened at 1:35 a.m. EDT. This marked a significant moment for the Crew-10 team as they joined the Expedition 72 crew.

Following the hatch opening, Suni Williams rang the ship’s bell, signaling the arrival of the new astronauts. They were greeted with handshakes and hugs, further emphasizing the sense of community aboard the ISS. Williams expressed her excitement, stating, “It was a wonderful day. Great to see our friends arrive,” during a communication with Mission Control.

Williams and fellow astronaut Butch Wilmore are set to guide the new arrivals through the workings of the space station. Their mission is expected to last only one week, following a previous delay that left them in space longer than planned. This extended stay was due to complications that required NASA to return Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft empty.

As the Crew-10 astronauts settle in, Crew-9 commander Nick Hague and Russian cosmonaut Aleksandr Gorbunov are scheduled to depart the ISS on Wednesday, potentially splashing down off the coast of Florida as early as 4 a.m. EDT.

This playful encounter not only highlights the lighter side of life in space but also underscores the collaborative spirit among international astronauts aboard the ISS.

Source: Original article

Three Active Tuberculosis Cases Reported in Maine Amid Rising National Trends

Three active tuberculosis cases have been reported in Maine’s Greater Portland area, prompting health officials to test contacts of the infected patients as cases rise nationwide.

Health officials in Maine are investigating three active cases of tuberculosis (TB) in the Greater Portland area. The Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported these cases as TB continues to rise across the United States.

Lindsay Hammes, a spokesperson for the Maine CDC, confirmed that the agency is aware of the three active TB cases linked to the Greater Portland area and is currently conducting its standard response protocols. The Maine CDC is reaching out to individuals who may have come into contact with the infected patients to facilitate testing.

Hammes noted that each of the three cases appears to have been contracted from separate sources, highlighting the need for thorough contact tracing and testing.

While tuberculosis is not as contagious as illnesses such as the flu or COVID-19, it remains a significant public health concern. According to the World Health Organization, TB is the deadliest infectious disease globally, claiming the lives of over one million people each year.

This week, a high school student in Riverside County, California, also tested positive for an active case of TB. Officials reported that the student is receiving treatment and is optimistic about making a full recovery, as reported by KTLA-TV. Additionally, another active case was identified at a high school in Michigan, according to WWJ-TV.

After decades of decline, tuberculosis cases began to rise in 2021, following a significant drop in 2020. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention noted this trend in a report from 2022, and it has continued into the current year.

In Maine, the state CDC reported a total of 28 TB cases through the end of July 2023. However, officials emphasized that there is no outbreak at this time.

Not everyone infected with TB exhibits symptoms, but those with active cases may experience a persistent cough, which can include coughing up blood or sputum, as well as chest pain, fever, and fatigue. TB primarily targets the lungs but can also affect other organs. The disease spreads from person to person through the air, according to information from Johns Hopkins University.

Fortunately, tuberculosis is a treatable bacterial infection, and effective antibiotics are available to cure the disease.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the Maine CDC for further comments regarding the ongoing investigation and response efforts.

Source: Original article

Rare Sighting of Octopus Riding Shark Captured on Camera

The rare sighting of an octopus riding a shark off the coast of New Zealand has captivated scientists and marine enthusiasts alike.

In a remarkable encounter captured on video, an octopus was seen riding atop a mako shark off the coast of New Zealand. This unusual sighting, shared by researchers from the University of Auckland, has been dubbed a “sharktopus.” The footage showcases a Maori octopus perched on the head of the world’s fastest shark, known for its ability to swim at speeds of up to 46 mph.

The incident occurred in December 2023 while university researchers were investigating shark feeding frenzies in the Hauraki Gulf, near Kawau Island. During their exploration, they encountered a mako shark distinguished by an “orange patch” on its head. To document the moment, the researchers deployed a drone and a GoPro camera into the water, leading to the unforgettable sight of the octopus clinging to the shark’s head with its tentacles.

Professor Rochelle Constantine, a marine scientist at the University of Auckland, described the sighting as one of the strangest experiences of her career. “It was a mysterious sight indeed,” she noted, emphasizing that octopuses typically dwell on the seabed, while short-fin mako sharks prefer shallower waters.

After observing the scene for approximately ten minutes, the researchers decided to move on, leaving the fate of the “sharktopus” uncertain. Constantine speculated that the octopus might have been in for quite an adventure, considering the speed at which mako sharks can swim. “The octopus may have been in for quite the experience, since the world’s fastest shark species can reach 30 mph,” she remarked.

Initially, Constantine was unsure of what she was witnessing. “At first, I was like, ‘Is it a buoy? Is it entangled in fishing gear or had a big bite?’” she recalled. However, she quickly realized that both the shark and the octopus appeared unbothered by the encounter. “The shark seemed quite happy, and the octopus seemed quite happy. It was a very calm scene,” she stated.

This rare interaction between two marine species has sparked interest and curiosity among scientists and the public alike, highlighting the wonders of ocean life and the unexpected behaviors of its inhabitants.

According to Fox News, the footage has not only provided a glimpse into the unique relationship between these two creatures but also serves as a reminder of the mysteries that still exist beneath the waves.

Source: Original article

Spectacular Blue Spiral Light in Night Sky Likely From SpaceX Rocket

A stunning blue spiral light, likely from a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, illuminated the night sky over Europe, captivating viewers and sparking social media commentary.

A mesmerizing blue light graced the night skies over Europe on Monday, captivating onlookers and sparking intrigue across social media platforms. This mysterious spiraling phenomenon was likely caused by the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket booster as it fell back toward Earth.

Time-lapse footage captured from Croatia around 4 p.m. EST (9 p.m. local time) showcased the glowing spiral, which many commentators likened to a cosmic whirlpool or spiral galaxy. The full video, recorded at normal speed, lasts approximately six minutes, providing a stunning visual of the event.

The Met Office in the United Kingdom reported receiving numerous accounts of an “illuminated swirl in the sky.” Experts have indicated that the display was likely linked to the SpaceX rocket that launched from Cape Canaveral, Florida, at around 1:50 p.m. EST as part of the classified NROL-69 mission for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO).

“This is likely to be caused by the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, launched earlier today,” the Met Office stated on X. “The rocket’s frozen exhaust plume appears to be spinning in the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight, causing it to appear as a spiral in the sky.”

The phenomenon is often referred to as a “SpaceX spiral,” according to Space.com. These spirals typically occur when the upper stage of a Falcon 9 rocket separates from its first-stage booster. As the upper stage continues its journey into space, the lower stage descends back to Earth, releasing any remaining fuel. This fuel freezes almost instantly at high altitudes, and sunlight reflects off it, creating the striking glow observed in the sky.

Fox News Digital reached out to SpaceX for further comment but did not receive an immediate response. This spectacular display followed closely on the heels of a successful mission in which a SpaceX team, in collaboration with NASA, returned two stranded astronauts from space.

The captivating blue spiral not only highlighted the wonders of modern space exploration but also served as a reminder of the intricate processes involved in rocket launches and landings. As technology continues to advance, such breathtaking displays may become more common, further igniting public interest in space travel and exploration.

Source: Original article

Arundhati Roy’s Memoir Explores Challenges of Being Mother Mary’s Daughter

Arundhati Roy’s memoir, *Mother Mary Comes to Me*, explores the complexities of her relationship with her mother, revealing the profound impact of intergenerational trauma and familial violence.

In *Mother Mary Comes to Me*, Arundhati Roy delivers a stark and deeply emotional portrait of intergenerational trauma and familial violence, intimately recounting her life experiences with and without her mother.

Roy’s mother, Mary, was a formidable figure whose legacy extended beyond her role as a woman and educator. Mary Roy notably challenged the Travancore Christian Succession Act of 1916, which denied women in parts of Kerala equal inheritance rights, ultimately taking her fight to the Supreme Court and winning. With sheer determination, she founded Pallikoodam in Kottayam, Kerala, an innovative school celebrated for its progressive curriculum that emphasized arts, music, and athletics.

Arundhati describes her mother as someone who conducted herself with the edginess of a gangster, unleashing her genius, eccentricity, radical kindness, militant courage, and unpredictable temper on their insular Syrian Christian society. This vivid portrayal illustrates how Mary made space for all aspects of herself within their small world.

However, Mary Roy was also a tough and broken woman. Her father was abusive, inflicting violence on his children and even injuring his wife. To escape this environment, Mary married the first man who proposed to her. Arundhati’s father, described as a “Nothing Man” and an alcoholic, further complicated their lives. Following her separation from him, Mary took her young children, Arundhati and her brother Lalith Kumar Christopher Roy (LKC), back to Kerala, unable to endure her husband’s presence any longer.

Returning to Ayemenem, just outside Kottayam, shattered Arundhati’s childhood further. She faced the stigma of being fatherless while living among “decent people.” Yet, she gradually became part of the landscape, forming a connection with the river, the village, and the wilderness, often retreating home as seldom as possible.

Roy’s narrative captures the emotional dislocation and societal judgment that defined her upbringing, while also revealing her quiet rebellion against adversity. Arundhati and her brother became their mother’s only refuge, but this came with unpredictability and emotional turmoil. She learned to navigate her mother’s moods, constantly anticipating the next outburst. Her mother’s love was often entangled with emotional blackmail, as she would say, “I love you Double,” leveraging their father’s absence against them.

Mary’s rage toward men, shaped by her experiences with her father, husband, and brother, was often redirected toward her son. In a particularly harsh moment, she told him, “You’re ugly and stupid. If I were you, I’d kill myself.” As an adult, Arundhati recognized that her brother was the only man her mother could punish for the perceived sins of the world. This dynamic fostered distrust between the siblings, as their mother played them off against each other.

In the early chapters of *Mother Mary Comes to Me*, Roy sets the stage for a turbulent adulthood shaped by the inescapable legacy of intergenerational trauma. The question arises: who escapes such an inheritance without being scarred?

Like many children shaped by trauma, Arundhati oscillated between hating her mother and loving her unconditionally. She quickly learned that excelling academically was her ticket to her mother’s approval, a survival strategy that became essential. Mary encouraged her to write, even editing her work with ruthless precision. However, as Arundhati’s literary success grew, her mother began to resent the author she had become.

Reflecting on her experiences, Arundhati writes, “I learned early that the safest place can be the most dangerous. And that even when it isn’t, I make it so.” These lines encapsulate the lifelong battle she waged within herself—a struggle that resonates throughout her Booker Prize-winning novel, *The God of Small Things*, where characters grapple with trust and the fleeting nature of happiness.

When Arundhati won the Booker Prize, she immediately called her mother, who simply responded, “Well done, baby girl.” This moment, which should have been one of the happiest in her life, was overshadowed by the persistent elusiveness of a solid relationship with her mother. Arundhati reflects that this was “the price I paid for being Mother Mary’s daughter.”

Following Mary Roy’s death, Arundhati found herself inconsolable, unraveling under the weight of their complicated relationship. The daughter who had spent her life resisting her mother’s control was ultimately broken by her absence.

In contrast, her brother LKC navigated the aftermath with a quieter resilience. He grew into himself with confidence, marrying and becoming a father, pouring love into his child. While Arundhati carried her mother’s fire, LKC found peace and a way to live despite their shared past.

The memoir delves into the profound mystery of Arundhati’s love for her mother. She muses, “If I could understand myself better, I’d probably understand a lot more about the world and certainly about my country, in which so many people seem to revere their persecutors and appear grateful to be subjugated.”

This inner conflict has fueled her lifelong battle against both personal and societal injustices, as she passionately advocates for marginalized communities, championing causes such as Kashmiri independence, Maoist rebels, environmental movements like the Narmada project, and nuclear disarmament.

Through these struggles, Arundhati embodies her mother’s strength, refusing to be silenced and speaking for those who cannot. At sixteen, she ran away from home to Delhi, marking a pivotal moment in her life. She fled because she felt like an “address-illathu pillaru”—a child without an address, a proper family name, or a true sense of belonging. Some might argue that Arundhati has been running ever since, as even moments of solace in her work or relationships feel temporary and precarious.

*Mother Mary Comes to Me* serves as the origin story of one of India’s most polarizing authors—a woman shaped and often torn by the painful contradictions of her life. It narrates her journey between a progressive education and an insular, patriarchal family structure, juxtaposing her extraordinary success with the wounds of a childhood marked by violence, control, and emotional isolation. Ultimately, it reflects her fierce independence and her enduring quest for her mother’s love and approval.

In sharing this story, Arundhati may not only be reflecting on her past but also seeking to lay certain burdens to rest. Perhaps now, with her mother gone, she will finally find a measure of peace within herself.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Lawmaker Proposes Bill to Limit Military Deployments

Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi has introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act to limit presidential authority over military deployments without state approval.

WASHINGTON, DC — Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) has taken a significant step by introducing an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that seeks to restrict the president’s authority to deploy U.S. military forces or federalize the National Guard without obtaining approval from state officials.

This legislative measure, co-sponsored by Congresswoman Haley Stevens (D-MI), is a reintroduction of their previously proposed Stop Trump’s Abuse of Power Act. The amendment arises in response to actions taken by former President Donald Trump, who threatened to deploy the National Guard to Chicago without a request from Illinois officials. Additionally, Trump had previously sent active-duty forces to cities such as Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.

Krishnamoorthi expressed concerns regarding the implications of such unilateral military actions, describing them as an overreach of executive power that could undermine constitutional protections. “No president should be able to turn the U.S. military into their personal police force,” he stated. He further criticized Trump’s threats to militarize Chicago, suggesting that such moves would lead to “chaos and spectacle” rather than effectively addressing public safety issues.

The proposed amendment would mandate that a governor or state executive must formally request federal military support prior to any deployment of active-duty personnel or the federalization of the National Guard. Furthermore, it would prohibit the use of military troops in response to peaceful protests or demonstrations without the necessary state approval.

Currently, the amendment is under review by the House Rules Committee, which will determine whether it can advance to a floor vote as part of the NDAA.

As discussions around military authority and state rights continue, Krishnamoorthi’s initiative reflects a growing concern among lawmakers regarding the balance of power between federal and state governments, particularly in the context of public safety and civil liberties.

Source: Original article

Federal Appeals Court Upholds Illinois Gun Restrictions on Public Transit

A federal appeals court has upheld Illinois’ ban on carrying firearms on public transit, reversing a previous ruling that deemed the restrictions unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

A federal appeals court has affirmed Illinois’ prohibition on carrying firearms on public transit, overturning a lower court decision that found the gun restrictions unconstitutional. The Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued its ruling on Tuesday, with Judge Joshua Kolar writing for the majority. He stated that the ban “is comfortably situated in a centuries-old practice of limiting firearms in sensitive and crowded, confined places.”

Judge Kolar emphasized that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to self-defense but does not prevent lawmakers from enacting regulations that ensure public transportation systems remain free from accessible firearms. “We are asked whether the state may temporarily disarm its citizens as they travel in crowded and confined metal tubes unlike anything the Founders envisioned,” he noted. The court drew on historical regulatory traditions to determine that the ban does not violate the Second Amendment.

Last year, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled in favor of four plaintiffs who argued that the restrictions on carrying guns on public buses and trains were unconstitutional. This decision was influenced by a 2022 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, which established a new standard for assessing the constitutionality of gun restrictions. The district court found that there was no historical precedent to justify the transit gun restrictions.

However, the appeals court concluded that the ban is constitutionally valid. “Our concern is whether the law aligns with the nation’s tradition,” the majority opinion stated. “We hold that [the law] is constitutional because it comports with regulatory principles that originated in the Founding era and continue to the present.” The case, initiated by several Illinois gun owners and supported by gun rights organizations, is anticipated to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The plaintiffs contended that the transit restrictions contradicted the Supreme Court’s 2022 Bruen decision. Nonetheless, the Seventh Circuit maintained that the state had demonstrated a sufficient historical basis for designating crowded public transport as a “sensitive place.” The firearm ban on public transit was enacted in 2013, making Illinois the last state in the U.S. to permit concealed carry in public.

In addition to prohibiting firearms on buses and trains, the legislation also restricts gun possession in hospitals and other public areas. Judge Kolar, appointed by President Joe Biden, was joined in the majority opinion by Judge Kenneth Ripple, who was appointed by former President Ronald Reagan. Judge Amy St. Eve, selected by President Donald Trump, wrote a separate concurring opinion, addressing a complex jurisdictional question regarding how to evaluate claims of injury related to the inability to engage in protected activities.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source: Original article

Vineet Gupta Discusses Student Debt and the Future of Management Education

Vineet Gupta, founder of Ashoka University, emphasizes the urgent need for management education in India to adapt amid rising costs, declining job placements, and the impact of artificial intelligence.

In India’s dynamic higher education landscape, the management degree, once considered a gateway to career success and social prestige, is now facing significant challenges. Each year, tens of thousands of young Indians enroll in MBA programs, only to confront the harsh realities of escalating tuition costs, disappointing campus placements, and increasing student loan debt. Vineet Gupta, founder of Ashoka University and Plaksha University, asserts that “management education has to reinvent to remain relevant not only in India but all over the world.”

The rapid expansion of management education in India over the past decade was fueled by a surge in demand. Currently, there are approximately 3,900 management schools across the country, offering nearly 350,000 seats. However, the landscape is shifting dramatically. Reports indicate that around 65 business management colleges are expected to close in 2025, while many others are grappling with declining enrollment and uncertain futures.

The underlying issue is clear: the promise of an MBA is increasingly failing to align with actual outcomes. Many lesser-known institutions are burdened by outdated curricula, inexperienced faculty, and a significant disconnect from the realities of the business world. Consequently, “very few respectable companies participate in the course-end recruitment drives,” leaving students without job offers despite investing between ₹4 lakh and ₹30 lakh in their education.

A recent survey highlights a troubling trend: nearly 50% of MBA graduates in India struggle to find relevant employment within months of graduation, particularly those hailing from Tier 2 and Tier 3 institutes, according to an ASSOCHAM report from 2017. Many of these young graduates are now encumbered by substantial student loans and lack a clear path to repayment, raising concerns about the true return on investment (ROI) of their education.

Gupta’s observations reflect this shift in perspective: “At the postgraduate level, a lot of middle-class families take loans especially for professional degrees like engineering, management, and medicine, hence the expectation of ROI is high. If the focus of accreditation shifts to quality, many of our institutions will face problems in getting notified.” The result is a troubling scenario where aggressive expansion and lax regulation have left too many students paying for degrees that fail to deliver meaningful career opportunities.

As demand stagnates for graduates from lower-tier business schools, elite institutions like the Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) continue to attract a robust pool of applicants. However, industry expectations have evolved. Companies now seek business graduates who are not only knowledgeable but also adaptable, multidisciplinary, and capable of solving real-world problems creatively.

Moreover, the rise of technology and artificial intelligence is fundamentally altering the job market. A McKinsey Global Report indicates that approximately one-third of activities across 60% of all jobs are automatable. In India, AI and automation have already led to reduced hiring in repetitive roles such as back-office operations, data entry, customer support, and even entry-level HR screening. For instance, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) recently announced layoffs affecting over 12,000 employees, attributing the decision to AI-driven efficiencies in coding, testing, and IT support. Analysts warn that up to 500,000 jobs in the outsourcing sector may be at risk due to these technological advancements.

As these technologies proliferate, fresh graduates—particularly those trained for routine corporate functions—are finding fewer job opportunities available to them. “Conventional MBA programs train the wrong people in the wrong ways with the wrong consequences,” remarked a leading academic, a sentiment echoed by numerous business leaders who question whether current programs adequately prepare graduates for future challenges.

Gupta offers a vision for addressing these pressing issues, advocating for a comprehensive rethinking of how management education is structured, delivered, and evaluated. He emphasizes the need for a shift from input-based evaluation—focusing on the number of teachers and facilities—to output-based metrics that prioritize graduate employability, student learning gains, and career progression.

Furthermore, he suggests that programs should be co-created with industry partners to ensure real-world relevance. Gupta advocates for making experiential learning, capstone projects, and internships core components of each program, stating, “It brings in the whole element of learning by doing.”

In light of the inevitability of AI, universities must equip students to work alongside technology rather than compete with it. This includes integrating courses on data analytics, machine learning, digital transformation, and AI-driven decision-making into the MBA curriculum. For example, Delhi University’s partnership with Google Cloud now trains students in AI, cloud computing, and data analytics.

Gupta also underscores the importance of teaching quality and student well-being. Engaging pedagogy, top faculty, and campus environments that foster resilience and holistic development are essential for nurturing capable graduates.

Transparency in outcomes is another critical area Gupta highlights. He suggests that regulators should publish placement, salary, and ROI data for each institution, empowering students to make informed decisions about their education.

Finally, he encourages experimentation and the adoption of global best practices, citing the Ashoka and Plaksha models, which are grounded in philanthropy, interdisciplinarity, and global benchmarking as examples of how to build impactful institutions.

As the traditional ‘MBA factory’ model begins to fade, a more rigorous, student-centric, and future-ready system must emerge. This transformation requires not only the integration of real-world industry practices but also alignment with the technological changes reshaping the job market. Gupta asserts, “We need an expansion in both capacity and quality of our higher education. For management education to justify its cost and earn back student trust, it must prove through jobs, innovation, and leadership development that it remains relevant in a rapidly changing global economy. Until that happens, student debt without jobs will continue to shape and challenge the very purpose of the Indian MBA.”

Source: Original article

Trump’s Military Action Against Cartel Vessel Signals Warning to Maduro

The recent U.S. Marine strikes on a cartel vessel off Venezuela signal a significant shift in the Trump administration’s approach to combating narco-terrorism in the region.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the United States will intensify its efforts against narco-terrorist organizations following a series of unprecedented strikes by U.S. Marines on a cartel-operated vessel off the coast of Venezuela earlier this week.

This military action, which resulted in the deaths of 11 members of the Tren de Aragua cartel, represents a marked departure from previous U.S. strategies aimed at countering the international drug trade. Historically, U.S. military operations have focused on seizing and apprehending cartel members since the late 1980s. However, this latest strike, which targeted a group designated as a terrorist organization by the Trump administration in February, indicates a more aggressive stance.

“The gloves are off,” stated Isaias Medina, a former Venezuelan diplomat who has become a dissident under the Nicolás Maduro regime. He emphasized that the Marine strike on the Tren de Aragua vessel, which was allegedly engaged in narcotics trafficking, signifies a pivotal moment in the ongoing battle against organized crime on an international scale.

President Donald Trump has consistently expressed his strong opposition to Maduro’s regime, even offering a $50 million reward for information leading to Maduro’s arrest and conviction. In response to the deployment of U.S. troops near Venezuela, Maduro condemned the action, claiming it was an attempt to instigate regime change and asserting, “Venezuela is confronting the biggest threat that has been seen on our continent in the last 100 years.”

The White House has faced scrutiny and international pushback regarding the implications of this military strike for future U.S. policy in South America. During a visit to Mexico, Rubio sought to clarify the administration’s intentions, stating, “The President of the United States is going to wage war on narco-terrorist organizations.”

Rubio criticized the previous policy of simply seizing and apprehending cartel members, arguing that it has proven ineffective. “These drug cartels know they’re going to lose 2% of their cargo—they bake it into their economics,” he explained. “What will stop them is when you blow them up, when you get rid of them.”

Medina pointed out that Maduro’s failure to address the activities of international narcotics rings has created an opportunity for the Trump administration to take decisive action. He noted that the Marines adhered to strict rules of engagement while targeting a terrorist organization believed to be trafficking drugs intended for the U.S.

“Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua, backed by Maduro, operates much like other state-sponsored terror groups, including Iran’s support for the Houthis, Hamas, and Hezbollah, all of which destabilize regions through illicit trade and violence,” Medina said. “Safe harbors in international waters are no longer sanctuaries for traffickers and smugglers.” He added that this strike sends a clear message that American forces and their allies will provide strong resistance to such operations.

Despite Maduro’s concerns that Trump’s ultimate goal is to oust his government, experts remain skeptical about the likelihood of significant regime change. Juan Cruz, a former senior director for Western Hemisphere affairs at the National Security Council, expressed doubt that the military deployment was intended to achieve that specific objective. “I can’t imagine this deployment had that specifically as an objective,” Cruz told Fox News Digital. “But [Trump] will certainly take that as a win if, for some reason, it had that outcome.”

As the situation unfolds, the implications of this military action will likely continue to shape the dynamics of U.S.-Venezuela relations and the broader fight against narco-terrorism in the region.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Authors Set to Shine at Jaipur Literature Festival USA 2025

In September 2025, the Jaipur Literature Festival USA will embark on a five-city tour, featuring prominent authors and cultural figures from around the globe.

The Jaipur Literature Festival (JLF) USA is set to return this September with an exciting five-city tour across the United States. This year’s festival will showcase a diverse array of literary and artistic luminaries, including renowned figures such as Shekhar Kapur, Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni, Siddhartha Mukherjee, Kiran Desai, and William Dalrymple, among others.

Presented by Teamwork Arts, the producer of the annual Jaipur Literature Festival and JLF International Festivals, JLF USA will take place from September 5 to September 27, 2025. The festival will kick off in Houston, Texas, and will subsequently travel to New York, Boulder, Colorado, Seattle, and North Carolina.

For over a decade, JLF USA has been a significant part of Teamwork Arts’ international offerings. Following successful editions in Valladolid, Spain, and London in June 2025, the festival is poised to create more connections through literature and dialogue during its U.S. journey. Each edition serves as a platform for powerful conversations, robust discourse, and cultural dialogue, featuring writers, thinkers, historians, scientists, and artists from around the world.

This year’s festival will delve into a variety of themes, including diasporic identities, migration and displacement, gender issues, democracy, medicine, film adaptations, memoir writing, and sacred verse. Key speakers will include Shekhar Kapur, Amish, Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni, Siddhartha Mukherjee, Sonora Jha, Arundhathi Subramaniam, Kiran Desai, Prajakta Koli, William Dalrymple, Kal Penn, Neal Katyal, Meenakshi Ahamed, Ruby Lal, Vikram Vij, and Maneet Chauhan.

“JLF USA platforms voices from across the world and champions their coming together to celebrate the written word, explore innovative ideas, and uphold the spirit of dialogue, diversity, and shared understanding,” said Sanjoy K. Roy, Managing Director of Teamwork Arts.

The festival is celebrated for its open and welcoming atmosphere, fostering a deep sense of community while showcasing South Asia’s unique multilingual literary traditions. Each city in the tour promises an immersive experience, featuring powerful sessions, eclectic performances, and engaging conversations that resonate with attendees.

JLF USA provides unparalleled exposure to some of the world’s leading professionals, thinkers, authors, nation-builders, business leaders, distinguished professors from prestigious universities, and senior research students. Typically, around 80 percent of the festival’s attendees are aged between 30 and 60 years and are based in the United States.

This year’s festival is being held in association with the Consulate General of India in Houston, New York, and Seattle, as well as the City of Boulder in Colorado. JLF North Carolina is supported by the University of North Carolina’s Carolina Asia Center, the Modern Indian Studies Initiative, the College of Arts and Sciences, Carolina Performing Arts, and other public and private partners across the state.

The festival will take place in various locations across the five cities:

In Houston, the festival will run from September 5 to 7, 2025, at notable venues such as the Asia Society Center, Rothko Chapel, Eternal Gandhi Museum, and the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, in collaboration with the local literary arts nonprofit, Inprint.

New York will host the festival from September 8 to 10, 2025, at the Asia Society, the National Arts Club, and the Center for Fiction.

Boulder, Colorado, will welcome the festival on September 13 and 14, 2025, at the Boulder Public Library.

Seattle will host its edition from September 19 to 21, 2025, at the Seattle Asian Art Museum and Town Hall Seattle.

Finally, North Carolina will conclude the festival with events on September 26, 27, and 28, 2025, at the University of North Carolina, supported by the Carolina Asia Center.

As the festival approaches, anticipation builds for what promises to be an enriching celebration of literature, culture, and community.

Source: Original article

Communities Show Solidarity With Immigrants in the U.S.

Community groups across the U.S. are actively resisting deportation policies and advocating for immigrant rights, emphasizing the vital role immigrants play in the economy.

In response to the Trump administration’s stringent deportation policies, community groups throughout the United States are rallying to advocate for immigrant rights and protections. Their message is clear: “No human being is illegal.”

These powerful slogans resonate deeply within the immigrant rights movement, echoing the sentiments of community activists across the nation. The deportation of immigrants has surged since the Trump administration took office, with reports detailing the shocking deportation of 104 Indians on a military plane in February 2025. To date, nearly 400 Indians have faced deportation.

Over recent months, agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have detained several student activists involved in peaceful protests against the destruction of Gaza. The administration has invoked the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act to deport nearly 300 immigrants to the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT) in El Salvador, a facility notorious for its harsh conditions.

ICE raids have targeted immigrant communities in various towns and cities across America. In Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, local residents banded together to support their neighbors and friends, demanding due process in the face of these aggressive actions.

Organizations dedicated to immigrant rights, along with legal advocates and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), are working tirelessly to halt deportations, and some courts have issued favorable rulings. The current U.S. population of approximately 342 million includes 53.3 million immigrants, with around 15 million classified as undocumented, often referred to disparagingly as illegal immigrants, according to a January report from the Center for Immigration Studies.

Activists are raising critical questions about who truly contributes to the wealth of the U.S. economy and performs the most challenging jobs. Immigrant workers are recognized as the backbone of the economy, a sentiment echoed at a recent seminar titled “Union and Community Activists Unite for Immigrant Rights,” organized by the Boston South Asian Coalition at the Cambridge Community Center in Massachusetts. The discussions held at this event remain relevant as the issues surrounding immigrant rights continue to escalate.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the construction industry employs approximately eight million workers, with 1.6 million of them being immigrants, representing 20% of the workforce. A report from the University of Michigan highlights that in cities like New York, immigrant workers make up 63% of construction workers, with 40% being undocumented. Furthermore, undocumented immigrant workers face a significantly higher incidence of work-related injuries, with rates 30% higher than those of native-born workers.

The agricultural sector also relies heavily on immigrant labor, contributing 0.8% to the GDP, which amounts to $222 billion. The combined agriculture and food-related industries account for 5.5% of the GDP, totaling $1.53 trillion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis in 2023. Remarkably, 73% of farm workers are immigrants, with half of them being undocumented.

In the care economy, which includes roles such as nannies, cleaners, and personal care assistants, an estimated 300,000 workers are undocumented, as reported by the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. David Grabowski, a professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School, noted that foreign-born workers constitute over 30% of non-direct care staff in long-term care facilities, emphasizing their crucial role in maintaining quality care.

The meatpacking industry, known for its hazardous working conditions, employs over 500,000 workers across the country. This sector heavily relies on H-2A and H-2B visa programs to fill jobs, as reported by the American Immigration Council. A 2024 report by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) revealed that 5,486 workers died on the job in 2022, with 1,248 of those fatalities involving Latino workers, 60% of whom were immigrants.

Community leaders and union activists are calling for organized efforts to combat the attacks on immigrants and all workers. Amrita Dani from the Boston Teachers Union emphasized the importance of collective action, stating, “Teachers and other organized workers can and should organize without fear with members of the community.”

She highlighted the legacy of International Workers Day, honoring the millions of immigrants who participated in demonstrations in May 2006. Evan MacKay, a Boston-based labor leader, pointed out that while contracts can secure victories, active enforcement by the workers is essential to ensure that legal agreements translate into real protections.

Heloisa Galvao, Executive Director of the Brazilian Women’s Group in Boston, shared the growing fears within the Brazilian community, where individuals are hesitant to attend doctor’s appointments, go to work, or send their children to school. This panic has resulted in devastating income losses, leading to increased rates of homelessness and food insecurity.

Galvao advocates for collective action to protect immigrant workers and their families, striving to create a just world for all. The rallying cries of “Hum Ladenge aur Aum Jeetenge!” (We will fight and win!) and “Si Si Puede” (Yes, yes, we can!) reflect the determination of union activists and community organizers from diverse backgrounds to ensure the safety and rights of immigrants.

As the fight for immigrant rights continues, it is clear that solidarity among workers and families is essential, regardless of immigration status. The ongoing efforts of community groups and activists highlight the critical role immigrants play in the fabric of American society.

Source: Original article

Labor Day 2025 Marks a Unique Perfect Square Date

This year’s Labor Day, falling on September 1, 2025, is notable for being a perfect square date, a rarity in the calendar.

Labor Day is a federal holiday in the United States, celebrated on the first Monday of September. It honors the labor movement and recognizes the contributions of American workers to the nation’s growth and achievements. This year, Labor Day will be observed on Monday, September 1, 2025, and it carries a remarkable mathematical distinction.

The year 2025 is significant as it is a perfect square year, expressed mathematically as 2025 = 45 × 45. Even more astonishing is that this year’s Labor Day date, written numerically as 9/1/2025 (or simply 912025), is also a perfect square: 912025 = 955 × 955.

Dates like these are referred to as perfect square dates, a term introduced in 2009. A perfect square date is defined as one in which the full date number, written without separators, equals a perfect square.

In 2009, two perfect square dates occurred: March 5, 2009 (03/05/2009 → 3052009 = 1747 × 1747) and April 1, 2009 (04/01/2009 → 4012009 = 2003 × 2003). Perfect square dates are rare; the 19th and 20th centuries each had only seven. In contrast, the 21st century is abundant with them, featuring 39 in the U.S. date format alone.

2025 stands out as it contains eight perfect square dates, the highest number to occur in any single year this century. These dates include:

January 9 — 01/09/2025

March 22 — 03/22/2025

April 18 — 04/18/2025

June 3 — 06/03/2025

September 1 — 09/01/2025 (Labor Day)

September 27 — 09/27/2025

October 9 — 10/09/2025

October 27 — 10/27/2025

Depending on whether the month and day are single- or double-digit, perfect square dates may appear in six-, seven-, or eight-digit forms. For example, this year’s Labor Day is expressed as 9/1/2025 (six digits) to reveal its square property.

Interestingly, September 1, 2004—written in eight digits as 09/01/2004—was also a perfect square date, since 9012004 = 3002 × 3002. However, in that year, Labor Day fell on September 6, not September 1.

Even more striking is that September 1, 2025, is a perfect square date worldwide. In countries that use the day/month/year format, the date is written as 01/09/2025, which also equals a perfect square: 1092025 = 1045 × 1045. This makes September 1, 2025, a universally recognized perfect square date, valid in both U.S. and international date notations.

The 21st century will contain 43 perfect square dates in the day/month/year system, six of which occur in 2025:

January 9 — 9/1/2025

March 6 — 6/3/2025

May 14 — 14/5/2025

September 1 — 01/09/2025

September 10 — 10/9/2025

September 27 — 27/09/2025

Among these, three dates are universally perfect squares, valid in both systems:

January 9, 2025 — U.S.: 01/09/2025 → 1092025 = 1045 × 1045; World: 9/1/2025 → 912025 = 955 × 955

September 1, 2025 — U.S. Labor Day: 9/1/2025 → 912025 = 955 × 955; World: 01/09/2025 → 1092025 = 1045 × 1045

September 27, 2025 — a truly rare case, as it is an eight-digit perfect square in both formats: U.S.: 09/27/2025 → 9272025 = 3045 × 3045; World: 27/09/2025 → 27092025 = 5205 × 5205.

This year’s Labor Day is not just a holiday but also a mathematical celebration. A perfect square date coinciding with Labor Day—and being valid in both global date systems—is an exceptionally rare event. The next occurrence of such a date will not happen anytime soon.

As you enjoy this year’s holiday, take a moment to appreciate the beautiful alignment of calendars and mathematics that makes Labor Day 2025 truly one of a kind.

Source: Original article

Democratic Representative Jerry Nadler Announces Decision Not to Seek Reelection

Longtime Democratic Representative Jerrold Nadler has announced he will not seek re-election, concluding a distinguished 34-year career in the U.S. House of Representatives.

U.S. Representative Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat from New York, has confirmed he will not run for re-election next year, marking the end of a notable 34-year tenure in Congress. Throughout his career, Nadler has been recognized as a leading voice for liberal advocacy on a variety of issues.

In an interview with the New York Times, Nadler, 78, expressed his belief in the need for generational change within the Democratic Party. “Watching the Biden thing really said something about the necessity for generational change in the party, and I think I want to respect that,” he stated.

Nadler’s decision comes after a significant shift in leadership dynamics within the House, as he was compelled to relinquish his position as chair of the House Judiciary Committee at the start of the current term. This change was largely due to the emergence of a younger, more energetic colleague who was poised to take over the role.

Throughout his career, Nadler has been a vocal critic of former President Donald Trump, often warning fellow Democrats about Trump’s leadership style. Their contentious relationship dates back to the 1980s, particularly concerning various Manhattan development projects. “I’m not saying we should change over the entire party,” Nadler remarked. “But I think a certain amount of change is very helpful, especially when we face the challenge of Trump and his incipient fascism.”

Nadler played a pivotal role in the impeachment proceedings against Trump, successfully guiding articles of impeachment through his committee in 2019. While he did not specify potential successors, he acknowledged that several candidates might vie for his seat. According to a source familiar with his thinking, Nadler is likely to support Micah Lasher, a member of the New York State Assembly who represents parts of the Upper West Side, should he choose to run.

Despite his impending departure, Nadler expressed confidence in the Democratic Party’s prospects for regaining control of the House in the upcoming elections. “Then you can cut the reign of terror in half,” he said, alluding to the current political climate.

In a social media post, New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani lauded Nadler as a champion of progressivism. “For more than 30 years, when New Yorkers needed a champion, we have turned to Jerry Nadler – and he has delivered for us time and again,” Mamdani wrote. “Few leaders can claim to have made such an impact on the fabric of our city.”

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, also a Democrat from New York, praised Nadler’s legacy, calling him a “relentless fighter for justice, civil rights and liberties and the fundamental promise of equality for all.” Jeffries highlighted Nadler’s efforts following the September 11 attacks, noting his dedication to securing care and support for New York City and its residents during a time of crisis.

“As Dean of the New York delegation, Congressman Nadler has been a dear friend and valued mentor to myself and so many others throughout the People’s House,” Jeffries added. “Jerry’s years of leadership have earned him a spot among our nation’s greatest public servants. He will be deeply missed by the House Democratic Caucus next term, and we wish him and his family the very best in this new chapter.”

Source: Original article

Red Alert Declared for Jammu and Kashmir Due to Severe Weather

Jammu and Kashmir faces a red alert from the IMD as severe weather conditions bring heavy rain, snowfall, and risks of flash floods and landslides over the next 48 hours.

Srinagar: The India Meteorological Department (IMD) has issued a red alert for Jammu and Kashmir, anticipating severe weather conditions over the next 48 hours. The region is expected to experience heavy to very heavy rainfall, particularly in Jammu and South Kashmir, while Central and North Kashmir may see moderate to heavy rainfall during this period.

In addition to the rainfall, fresh snowfall is predicted for high-altitude areas, including Razdan Top, Zojila Pass, Sinthan Top, and the higher reaches of Sonamarg, Pahalgam, and Shopian by tomorrow morning. The IMD has raised concerns about potential cloudbursts, flash floods, and landslides, particularly in vulnerable regions. Residents are advised to steer clear of rivers, streams, and unstable slopes to ensure their safety.

Recent weather events have already had tragic consequences in the region. In Reasi district, a landslide triggered by heavy rains resulted in the deaths of seven members of a single family. Similarly, in Ramban district, four individuals lost their lives due to a cloudburst followed by landslides. A particularly devastating flash flood in Chositi village, Kishtwar district, caused by a cloudburst on August 14, resulted in at least 67 fatalities, over 300 injuries, and left around 71 individuals missing.

The ongoing monsoon rains have also disrupted key highways across Jammu and Kashmir, affecting trade routes and ongoing pilgrimages. In response to the escalating situation, authorities have activated control rooms and helplines that are staffed around the clock to manage emergencies. Residents are urged to remain vigilant, adhere to official advisories, and avoid unnecessary travel during this critical period.

As the situation develops, local authorities are closely monitoring the weather patterns and will continue to provide updates to ensure the safety of residents and travelers alike.

Source: Original article

Former FBI Director Robert Mueller Diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease

Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, a condition revealed by his family in a recent statement.

Robert Mueller, the former FBI director and special counsel known for leading the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, has been diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease. His family disclosed this information in a statement to the New York Times on Sunday.

Mueller, who is 81 years old, received his diagnosis in the summer of 2021. Following this, he retired from public life at the end of that year after a brief period of teaching law. According to the family statement, he taught at his alma mater during the fall semesters of both 2021 and 2022 before fully retiring.

“Bob was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease in the summer of 2021. He retired from the practice of law at the end of that year. He taught at his law school alma mater during the fall of both 2021 and 2022, and he retired at the end of 2022,” the statement read.

In light of his health issues, the House Oversight Committee had previously subpoenaed Mueller to testify regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. However, lawmakers withdrew this request upon learning about his health struggles. A source familiar with the situation informed Fox News Digital that the committee “learned that Mr. Mueller has health issues that preclude him from being able to testify.”

This decision to withdraw the subpoena occurred prior to the public disclosure of Mueller’s Parkinson’s diagnosis. Reports indicate that he has been experiencing difficulties with speech and mobility, which have impacted his ability to comply with congressional requests.

Mueller served as FBI director from 2001 to 2013, a period during which he oversaw the bureau’s investigation into Epstein in 2007. His involvement in high-profile cases has made him a notable figure in American politics and law enforcement.

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, a Republican from Kentucky, has emphasized the importance of this period in his inquiry, referencing a draft indictment against Epstein that was ultimately set aside in favor of a controversial non-prosecution agreement.

Mueller’s family has requested that their privacy be respected during this challenging time.

According to Fox News Digital, Mueller’s health issues have raised concerns about his ability to participate in legal proceedings and public testimony.

Source: Original article

Modi Urges SCO Members to Reject Double Standards on Terrorism

Prime Minister Narendra Modi emphasized the need for unity against terrorism and called for global reforms during the 25th Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Summit in Tianjin.

New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the 25th Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit in Tianjin on Monday, delivering a clear message regarding the fight against terrorism. He urged member states to abandon selective approaches, emphasizing that such tactics are no longer acceptable.

During his address, Modi outlined India’s three guiding pillars for the SCO: security, connectivity, and opportunity. He also advocated for reforms within the organization and on a global scale.

“Terrorism is not just a threat to the security of any one country; it is a shared challenge for all humanity. No country, no society, no citizen can consider themselves safe from it,” Modi stated, addressing an audience that included prominent world leaders such as Chinese Premier Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

According to official sources, the atmosphere among the three leaders was notably warm, reflecting mutual respect during the summit.

Modi referenced the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, India, highlighting its impact on the nation. “In this hour of grief, I thank those friends who stood by us. This attack was not just an assault on India’s conscience—it was an open challenge to every nation and every person who believes in humanity,” he remarked.

The Prime Minister called for clarity and unity among SCO members, insisting, “We must say clearly, in one voice, that no double standards on terrorism will be acceptable. We must oppose it in every colour, every form. This is our duty to humanity.” He also noted India’s leadership role in a joint SCO operation against al-Qaeda-linked groups this year, emphasizing the need for deeper coordination in combating radicalization and terror financing.

In discussing connectivity, Modi asserted that stronger links can foster both trust and commerce. He cited the Chabahar Port and the International North-South Transport Corridor, stating, “Connectivity that bypasses sovereignty loses trust and meaning.” He stressed that all projects must respect sovereignty and territorial integrity, as mandated by the SCO charter.

On the topic of opportunity, Modi reflected on India’s 2023 presidency, which brought issues such as start-ups, digital inclusion, traditional medicine, youth empowerment, and shared Buddhist heritage to the forefront of the SCO agenda. He proposed the establishment of a Civilizational Dialogue Forum to highlight the art, literature, and traditions of member states.

Linking this broader vision to India’s domestic agenda of “Reform, Perform and Transform,” Modi noted that the country has turned challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic and global economic shocks into new opportunities. He invited SCO members to engage with India’s reform-driven growth.

Modi welcomed the SCO’s decision to create new centers aimed at combating organized crime, drug trafficking, and cybersecurity. He stressed that the organization should also advocate for global institutional reforms. With the 80th anniversary of the United Nations approaching, he called for collaborative efforts, stating, “The aspirations of the Global South cannot be constrained within outdated frameworks. We cannot show the multicoloured dreams of the new generation on a black-and-white screen. The screen must change.”

In closing, Modi framed the SCO as a guide for multilateralism and an inclusive world order, congratulating Kyrgyzstan’s President Sadyr Japarov on assuming the chairmanship of the grouping.

Source: Original article

Chicago Mayor Says Police Will Not Collaborate with National Guard

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has signed an executive order preventing local police from collaborating with National Guard troops or federal agents amid threats of deployment by President Trump.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, a Democrat, took decisive action on Saturday by signing an executive order that prohibits the city’s police officers from collaborating with National Guard troops or federal agents. This move comes in response to President Donald Trump’s threats to deploy these forces to the Windy City.

During a news conference attended by city leaders, Johnson emphasized the intent behind the order. “This executive order makes it emphatically clear that this president is not going to come in and deputize our police department,” he stated.

The executive order clarifies that while Chicago police will continue to enforce state and local laws, they will not engage in joint operations with the National Guard or federal agents. This includes activities such as patrols, arrests, immigration enforcement, and other law enforcement actions.

Johnson expressed his commitment to protecting civil liberties and the community, saying, “We will protect our Constitution, we will protect our city, and we will protect our people.” He voiced strong opposition to the idea of military presence in the city, stating, “We do not want to see tanks in our streets. We do not want to see families ripped apart. We do not want grandmothers thrown into the back of unmarked vans. We don’t want to see homeless Chicagoans harassed or disappeared by federal agents.”

The order also mandates that city police officers wear their official uniforms, clearly identify themselves, and adhere to body camera protocols. Officers are instructed not to wear masks, ensuring they can be easily distinguished from any federal operations.

Johnson reiterated, “The Chicago Police Department will not collaborate with military personnel on police patrols or civil immigration enforcement. We will not have our police officers who are working hard every single day to drive down crime deputized to do traffic stops and checkpoints for the president.”

The executive order highlights concerns regarding the deployment of federal military forces in Chicago without local consent, stating that such actions “undermine democratic norms, violate the City’s sovereignty, threaten civil liberties, and risk escalating violence rather than securing the peace.”

This executive order arises amid ongoing tensions between Johnson, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, and Trump regarding the potential deployment of National Guard troops to combat crime in Chicago. Johnson has pointed to recent data indicating a decline in violent crime, with homicides and robberies decreasing by over 30% and shootings dropping by nearly 40% in the past year.

Pritzker has also issued warnings to Trump, asserting that any federal deployment without the state’s request would be “unconstitutional” and “un-American.”

In response to the Democratic leaders’ statements, Trump criticized both Pritzker and Johnson, labeling Pritzker as “incompetent” and Johnson as “no better.”

The White House dismissed Johnson’s executive order, suggesting that Democrats were politicizing efforts to address crime. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson stated, “If these Democrats focused on fixing crime in their own cities instead of doing publicity stunts to criticize the President, their communities would be much safer.”

In light of the escalating situation, Johnson mentioned that he is considering all legal and legislative measures to prevent federal intervention, including the possibility of lawsuits. “We will use the courts if that’s necessary,” he affirmed.

Historically, previous deployments of the National Guard to Chicago were coordinated with local officials. While the president has the authority to deploy troops, U.S. law limits this power, though there are no restrictions on sending ICE agents or other federal law enforcement officers.

Trump’s threats to deploy troops to Chicago follow his recent actions to increase federal law enforcement presence in Washington, D.C., as part of efforts to combat crime. Hundreds of federal agents and National Guard troops have been stationed in D.C. to address safety concerns.

As tensions continue to rise, the implications of Johnson’s executive order and the potential federal response remain to be seen.

Source: Original article

Reducing Gestational Diabetes Risk Among Indian-American Women: Key Strategies

Gestational diabetes rates among Indian American women are rising, prompting a call for culturally inclusive prenatal care that honors individual identities and dietary practices.

As I stared at the orange soda, a wave of nausea washed over me. The sickeningly sweet taste lingered in my memory, but I forced myself to drink it quickly. The nurse set a timer, and I felt a knot form in my stomach as I awaited the results. Soon after, the test confirmed my fears: I had gestational diabetes.

This diagnosis was unexpected. I had experienced no warning signs, which I later learned is common. My obstetrician promptly referred me to a dietitian specializing in diabetes prevention and management. During our session, I found myself confronted with menus filled with vibrant vegetables, whole grains, and animal-based proteins. However, these options felt foreign to me. Where were the dals, lentils, and staple proteins that my ancestors had relied on for sustenance for centuries?

As an Indian American woman, I quickly realized the need to advocate for a healthy pregnancy while honoring my cultural identity within a healthcare system that often favors a one-size-fits-all approach. This should not be the case. All women deserve access to prenatal care that addresses their unique needs and identities. Earlier this year, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists released new recommendations for personalized prenatal care. This was a promising first step toward supporting the diverse cultural, social, and structural needs of expectant mothers. Now, it is crucial to implement these recommendations effectively.

The rates of gestational diabetes in the United States are on the rise, affecting approximately 8 out of every 100 births each year. Women who are less active or have a higher body mass index are at an increased risk of developing this condition. Alarmingly, Indian women in the U.S. experience the highest rates of gestational diabetes, with about 16 out of every 100 births impacted. Diagnosing and managing this condition is vital due to potential risks, including increased neonatal birth weight, high maternal blood pressure, and a heightened long-term risk of developing type 2 diabetes for mothers.

As a prevention scientist, I immediately sought ways to adjust my lifestyle to manage my condition. While lifestyle changes may not work for everyone, my obstetrician assured me that this approach often yields positive results.

Being a vegetarian is not just a dietary choice for me; it is deeply intertwined with my Indian heritage and identity. Growing up vegetarian, following in my ancestors’ footsteps, and choosing to maintain this lifestyle as an adult are rooted in my ancestral Jain value of ahimsa, which promotes peace and respect for all living beings. This value has been passed down through generations.

My one-hour session with the dietitian turned out to be one of the most impactful clinical experiences I have ever had. I learned how to read food labels, track my dietary intake, and make informed decisions about my daily choices. It also became clear that I had conflated vegetarianism with a plant-based diet over the years. Out of convenience, I had been consuming an imbalanced amount of pasta and bread, which did not align with my traditional Indian vegetarian diet.

Feeling overwhelmed by the prescribed diet, I turned to my mother for reassurance. She reminded me that generations of women have had healthy pregnancies and babies while adhering to a traditional Indian vegetarian diet. This conversation inspired me to integrate our ancestral foods with the strategies I learned from the dietitian. I began replacing convenient, simple starches with pre-cut vegetables and pre-cooked and frozen traditional Indian vegetarian dishes made from dals, vegetables, herbs, and spices.

These changes allowed me to honor my cultural identity and values while effectively managing my gestational diabetes. During subsequent prenatal care visits, my obstetrician confirmed that my glucose levels had returned to normal.

Years later, I continue to apply the lessons I learned during my pregnancy in my daily life, practicing prevention through my lifestyle choices and advocating for culturally inclusive care. The memories of this experience remain vivid. As a nation, we must strive for truly personalized prenatal care that provides equitable access and meets the diverse cultural needs and identities of all expectant mothers. Indian American women should feel fully included and empowered to lead their own health decision-making. Combining prenatal care with lifestyle changes that reflect my Jain Indian values allowed me to maintain a healthy pregnancy without compromising my identity.

Source: Original article

Top Senate Republican Proposes Rule Change for Trump Nominee Confirmations

Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso is prepared to invoke the nuclear option to expedite the confirmation of President Trump’s nominees amid ongoing Democratic opposition.

Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., has signaled his readiness to employ the nuclear option to overcome the Democratic blockade of President Donald Trump’s nominees. As Senate Republicans prepared to leave Washington, D.C., for their home states, they were close to reaching an agreement with their Democratic counterparts to advance numerous non-controversial appointments. However, those discussions collapsed after Trump rejected further negotiations tied to funding demands from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

Currently, there are 145 nominations pending on the Senate’s executive calendar, a number that is expected to increase when the Senate reconvenes. Lawmakers are set to return on Tuesday, and Barrasso is eager to address the nomination impasse immediately. He has been actively engaging in a public pressure campaign, including writing an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal that directly criticizes Schumer.

In an interview with Fox News Digital, Barrasso expressed his determination to see Trump’s nominees confirmed, stating, “We need to either get a lot of cooperation from the Democrats, or we’re going to have to roll over them with changes of the rules that we’re going to be able to do in a unilateral way, as well as President Trump making recess appointments.”

However, Senate Democrats, under Schumer’s leadership, are unlikely to cooperate. In response to Barrasso’s remarks, Schumer asserted that “historically bad nominees deserve a historic level of scrutiny by Senate Democrats.” Barrasso countered, pointing out that Schumer’s criticism stems solely from the fact that the nominees were put forward by Trump. “That is his sole criteria for which these people are being gone after and filibustered,” Barrasso said, noting that many nominees have bipartisan support.

Utilizing the nuclear option would enable Republicans to modify the confirmation process without Democratic assistance. However, this approach could hinder future negotiations on important legislative items that would require bipartisan support to advance past the Senate filibuster. Barrasso, undeterred by the potential consequences, indicated that the nominees under consideration are primarily for sub-Cabinet level positions and ambassadorships.

Discussions are ongoing regarding potential changes to the confirmation process, including adjustments to debate time and criteria for expedited nominations. Additionally, the possibility of allowing Trump to make recess appointments is under consideration, which would necessitate the Senate going into recess.

Barrasso highlighted the inefficiencies of the current process, noting that it takes three hours to conduct a single nomination vote, which significantly hampers legislative productivity. “When you take a look at this right now, it takes a 30-minute roll-call vote to get on cloture, and then two hours of debate time, and then another 30-minute roll-call vote,” he explained. “That’s three hours, and it’s time when you can’t do legislation, you can’t do any of the other things.”

As Congress prepares to return, Barrasso acknowledged the pressing need to address the backlog of nominations, particularly given the looming deadline to fund the government by September 30. He emphasized that the limited time available for the nominations process necessitates a rules change to expedite confirmations.

“This backlog is going to worsen this traffic jam at the Schumer toll booth,” Barrasso warned. “So, we are going to do something, because this cannot stand.”

Source: Original article

Young Poet Receives 2025 Award for Creative Writing on Refugees

Eleven-year-old Luu Ly from New York City won the 2025 Celebrate America Creative Writing Contest for her poignant poem honoring her grandparents’ journey as refugees from Vietnam.

WASHINGTON, DC, June 24, 2025—The American Immigration Council has awarded Luu Ly, an 11-year-old student at the Chapin School in New York City, the prestigious 28th annual Celebrate America Creative Writing Contest award. This contest celebrates the immigrant experience through the lens of young writers.

Luu’s poem, titled “American Poem,” tells the compelling story of her grandparents’ escape from Vietnam during the war. It details their journey as refugees who eventually settled in a small town in Louisiana. Initially facing hostility and suspicion from their new community, Luu’s grandmother became one of the first Vietnamese American teachers in the area. Through her dedication and the sharing of her family’s spring roll recipe, she fostered a sense of belonging and connection among her neighbors. Luu continues to honor her grandmother’s legacy by making spring rolls and embracing her grandmother’s motto: “roll forward, always forward.”

In addition to her poetic talents, Luu describes herself as a “proud New Yorker with a foodie’s heart.” She enjoys exploring diverse cuisines and sharing culinary experiences with family and friends, reflecting the values of community and connection that her grandmother instilled in her.

The Celebrate America Creative Writing Contest invites fifth graders from across the nation to reflect on immigration and the importance of being a welcoming society. In a climate where many Americans are increasingly critical of policies that prioritize mass deportation and detention of immigrants, the American Immigration Council is committed to promoting educational initiatives that encourage a more inclusive vision for the United States.

Luu received her award during the 2025 Immigration Impact Reception, hosted by the American Immigration Council on June 20 in Aurora, Colorado. The contest is made possible through the generous support of the MurthyNAYAK Foundation.

Luu, along with her family and representatives from the American Immigration Council, are available to discuss the contest and her winning poem.

Source: Original article

U.S.-Born Indian-Americans Risk Losing Connection to India, Experts Warn

India must actively engage U.S.-born Indian Americans through educational initiatives to maintain crucial ties that benefit both nations economically and culturally.

There is an urgent need for India to educate and actively engage U.S.-born Indian Americans. Educational institutions and philanthropists should collaborate to develop immersive study tours for college-aged Indian Americans that expose them to the true realities of modern India, including its religious diversity, complex democracy, and advanced technological landscape. Family trips to India often provide a narrow slice of the country and cannot substitute for a broader immersion experience. Without such initiatives, India risks losing the vast benefits it currently enjoys from its diaspora in the United States.

India is the world’s top recipient of remittances, receiving a staggering $135 billion from its diaspora in the last fiscal year, a significant portion of which comes from the United States. These remittances account for 3–4% of India’s GDP, directly supporting household welfare, rural development, and economic stability. Additionally, in 2023 alone, Indian Americans contributed over $1 billion in philanthropic donations.

However, the powerful impact of the Indian diaspora in the United States is at risk of fraying. If American-born Indian children do not develop a better understanding of and connection to modern India, India stands to lose not only vital economic support but also the diplomatic and technological linkages nurtured by a culturally engaged diaspora.

A 2024 survey by the Carnegie Endowment found that only 46% of U.S.-born Indian Americans communicate monthly with friends or family in India, compared to 71% of foreign citizens from India. Just 58% of U.S.-born Indian Americans watched Indian television or films in the past month, versus 77% of foreign citizens. From my two decades teaching in higher education—mostly at Cornell Law School—I have encountered virtually no Indian American students who demonstrated a nuanced understanding of India beyond its dance and food.

Today, approximately 5.2 million Indian Americans reside in the United States, with about one-third—approximately 1.8 million—born in the country. Without intentional efforts to nurture their connection to India, there is a legitimate concern that in 30 to 40 years, as the first generation of immigrants passes on, India may lose the extraordinary benefits its diaspora currently provides.

Moreover, a new cohort of immigrants may never replenish this loss, especially if U.S. immigration policies remain restrictive. Even if pathways remain open, many highly skilled Indians may choose not to move to the United States, finding increasing opportunities and prosperity at home.

Other diaspora communities have long recognized the necessity of engaging their second generations. A notable example is the Jewish diaspora, which funds 10-day heritage trips to Israel for young adults aged 18 to 26. This program, known as “Birthright Israel,” is sponsored by the Birthright Israel Foundation, whose donors subsidize participation. Founded in 1994 by philanthropists Charles Bronfman and Michael Steinhardt in partnership with the Israeli government, Birthright has attracted major donors such as Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, who contributed over $500 million.

By 2020, Pew Research estimated that around 25% of American Jews ages 18–46 had participated in Birthright. It is widely regarded as the most influential organization shaping relations between Israel and its diaspora. Over one million Jewish individuals worldwide have taken part in these heritage tours, with studies indicating that participants become more connected to and engaged with multiple domains of Jewish life after returning from the trip.

While both the Indian and Jewish diasporas in the United States are prominent, highly educated, and economically successful communities, they differ significantly. The connection of Jewish Americans to Israel is often ideological, religious, and institutional. Conversely, the connection of Indian Americans to India is primarily familial, cultural, and economic rather than ideological. This distinction is partly due to the greater diversity among Indian Americans in terms of religion, language, and political views.

Despite these differences, a fully funded immersion experience about modern India for Indian Americans can still be beneficial in strengthening their connections to India and enhancing their understanding of its role as a global power.

Although the Indian government has initiated a travel program called “Know India” for college-aged Indian Americans, some may be concerned that the Indian government would not provide an unbiased view of the country. Therefore, Indian American philanthropists, educational institutions, and community leaders must come together now to build and sustain heritage programs that genuinely engage the next generation. Without immediate, coordinated action, we risk watching the invaluable connection between India and its American-born diaspora unravel, along with the economic, diplomatic, and political benefits it brings.

The time to act is now. Indian American donors and institutions must invest in the future of this relationship by creating meaningful opportunities for young Indian Americans to discover and embrace their heritage. This should be done in a manner that presents the true marvels and complexities of modern India from a neutral perspective, incorporating robust educational and professional engagement elements. The future of the relationship between India and its diaspora depends on the choices we make today.

Source: Original article

Masala Chai: Exploring Its Role in Indian-American Culture and Memory

Chai, a beloved beverage in Indian culture, serves as a powerful metaphor for connection, memory, and healing, weaving through the fabric of family life and personal experiences.

If you are active on Instagram, you may have encountered a humorous reel suggesting that if Indians had been aboard the Titanic, they would have tried to savor their last few sips of chai before succumbing to the icy waters. When a friend shared this with me, I couldn’t help but nod in agreement.

Those who know me would likely say that my middle name could easily be “chai.” During my internship at an Ayurvedic hospital in India, my peers even created a dance in my honor called the “Chai-dance.” After enduring 14-hour shifts at the hospital and then working another eight hours for my commitments in the U.S. for over three weeks, chai was my lifeline, helping me navigate those exhausting days and nights.

Chai, or milk tea brewed in the traditional Indian style, holds a sacred place in the hearts of many Indians. It is more than just a beverage; it symbolizes family and memories. A cup of chai often serves as the backdrop for significant conversations—whether it’s life advice from elders, stories of migration, or whispered family secrets.

Even for those who do not drink chai, its cultural significance is widely recognized. It is a key ingredient in countless stories, traditions, travels, and celebrations, and is often the go-to beverage when asking for directions. The chai-waala ki dukaan, or corner tea shop, is a familiar landmark in every Indian city.

Making chai is a ritual steeped in remembrance, connection, and healing. The sound of choti elaichi (green cardamom pods) crackling, the sharp aroma of freshly grated ginger, and the steam rising as milk boils create a sensory experience that feels deeply personal. Each family has its unique twist on the recipe, with variations in spices and methods, reflecting individual traditions. You may have witnessed a cherished intergenerational moment in the kitchen, watching a parent or grandparent prepare their special chai, as this drink is anything but one-size-fits-all.

In many households, chai breaks provide a moment of respite for helpers, who often share gossip over this comforting beverage amidst the chaos of daily life. Offering chai is a gesture of love and hospitality in Indian culture; every guest is typically welcomed with a cup. I recall seeing shop owners in India serving chai to their customers, further emphasizing its role in fostering connections.

One of my fondest memories is sitting on the terrace of my husband’s ancestral home with his grandmother, Dadi. Despite our differences, we bonded over several cups of tulsi chai on crisp, foggy January mornings during our visits to India. In those quiet moments, chai became a language of love that transcended words.

As a child, I often accompanied my mother on shopping trips, which I found tedious. However, I cherished the moments spent sipping chai, as it represented a connection to our roots and traditions while adapting to new experiences. These shopping excursions were often for new brides in the family, transforming mundane errands into joyful connections.

Chai has also served as a confidante during difficult times. It has been present during moments of loss, exams, and significant life transitions, becoming both a comfort drink and a cultural staple. I vividly remember sipping chai after my father’s cremation and standing outside the ICU, unaware that it would be the last time I would see my father-in-law. In the midst of planning my father’s Chautha (memorial service) and my mother’s ninth death anniversary puja, I found solace at a tea stall by the hospital.

In my family, chai has always represented more than just boiled leaves and milk; it is an inheritance, akin to jewelry or old photographs. After my marriage, I bonded with my mother-in-law over our shared love for morning masala chai rituals. When I moved to New York City, chai became my anchor—a rare pause in a fast-paced world. In a city that often felt foreign, boiling water with crushed ginger, green cardamom, and tea leaves transformed my kitchen into an extension of every kitchen I had ever known.

Chai has been our universal language. After my mother passed away unexpectedly in her early sixties, chai became a means of bonding and healing for my father and me. For nearly nine years, we shared a daily ritual of sipping chai, reminiscing about memories and stories of my mother. However, after my father’s passing, chai lost its significance in my life.

In the wake of his death, I found myself sitting at the dining table, clutching a cup of chai that I barely tasted. The warmth against my palms grounded me when everything else felt chaotic. For months, I couldn’t bring myself to make masala chai; I settled for tea bags or instant chai. The ritual felt hollow, and the kitchen was too quiet without my father’s voice on the other end of the phone or the familiar rhythm of our conversations over chai.

It seemed unimaginable to continue drinking chai when the person who had introduced me to this sacred beverage and shared countless cups with me was gone. The cardamom lost its fragrance, the ginger tasted too sharp, and every sip reminded me of conversations that would never happen again. It felt as if chai had lost its sweetness, its meaning steeped in grief I was not ready to confront.

Eventually, I decided to forgo my morning chai altogether. Surprisingly, I did not miss it. My life philosophy revolves around asking, “Does it nourish me?” Chai no longer did. While I experienced no caffeine withdrawal, a sense of emptiness lingered. So much of life felt unfamiliar as I referred to many loved ones in the past tense. Chai had always symbolized connection, and without my father, it felt like an empty ritual, a ghost of what it once was.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Proposes Four-Year Limit for Foreign Students in the U.S.

The Trump administration has proposed a rule to limit the duration of stay for international students in the U.S. to four years, aiming to address visa misuse and enhance oversight.

The Trump administration has announced a proposed rule that would impose a four-year limit on the length of time international students can remain in the United States for their studies. This rule, set to be published on Thursday, is part of an effort to curb what the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) describes as “visa abuse” and to improve the agency’s ability to vet and oversee foreign students.

According to the DHS, foreign students have taken advantage of U.S. policies, remaining enrolled in educational programs indefinitely, which the agency refers to as becoming “forever students.” A spokesperson for the DHS stated, “For too long, past Administrations have allowed foreign students and other visa holders to remain in the U.S. virtually indefinitely, posing safety risks, costing untold amounts of taxpayer dollars, and disadvantaging U.S. citizens.”

The proposed rule aims to end this practice by limiting the duration of stay for certain visa holders, thereby easing the federal government’s burden in overseeing foreign students and their immigration history. Since 1978, holders of F visas, which are designated for foreign students, have been allowed to remain in the U.S. for the “duration of status,” meaning as long as they are enrolled as full-time students.

Under the new proposal, foreign students and exchange visitors would be allowed to stay in the U.S. only for the duration of their academic program, capped at four years. This duration is typically shorter than the time required to pursue advanced degrees beyond a bachelor’s degree.

In addition to the changes for students, the proposed rule would also affect foreign journalists, who would initially be admitted for up to 240 days. They could apply for an extension of up to another 240 days, but their stay would not exceed the length of their assignment.

The DHS believes that requiring regular assessments for foreigners wishing to remain in the U.S. for extended periods will facilitate better oversight and reduce the number of individuals in the country on visas. However, the proposed rule has raised concerns among educational institutions and advocates for international students.

International students often pay higher tuition rates and have limited access to scholarships, which means that this new rule could have significant financial implications for U.S. colleges and universities. Fanta Aw, executive director and CEO of NAFSA: Association of International Educators, expressed concern about the potential impact, stating, “It will certainly act as an additional deterrent to international students choosing to study in the United States, to the detriment of American economies, innovation, and global competitiveness.”

As the proposed rule moves forward, it is expected to spark debate over the balance between national security and the benefits of international education in the U.S.

Source: Original article

Ethan Agarwal, Indian-American Entrepreneur, Announces Candidacy for California Governor

Palo Alto entrepreneur Ethan Agarwal has officially announced his candidacy for California Governor in the 2026 elections, emphasizing a blend of progressive values and pro-business policies.

Palo Alto-based Indian-American entrepreneur Ethan Agarwal has declared his intention to run for Governor of California in the upcoming 2026 gubernatorial elections. The announcement was first reported by Axios on August 25, which described Agarwal as a “Democrat who believes in capitalism.”

Agarwal is the founder of two startups, Aaptiv and The Coterie, and has successfully raised a total of $110 million for his ventures, as noted on his LinkedIn profile. In a video shared on social media to announce his candidacy, he articulated his political stance, stating, “I’m pro-choice, I believe in gun control, I believe in immigration, I believe in LGBTQ rights, I’m also fiercely pro-capitalism.”

Through various social media platforms, Agarwal has expanded on his positions regarding a range of issues. He identifies as pro-business and has expressed concern that California is losing its competitive edge as tech companies relocate to other states. He advocates for substantial investment in infrastructure and energy capacity within California.

In a recent social media post, Agarwal outlined “ten ideas to make California better.” Among his proposals, he suggested the construction of three additional University of California campuses and the relocation of the state capital from Sacramento to either San Francisco or Los Angeles.

Support for Agarwal’s campaign is gaining momentum, with notable figures such as Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan, DoorDash co-founder Stanley Tang, and Tribe Capital co-founder Arjun Sethi planning to host fundraising events for him. Additionally, Agarwal has scheduled two virtual campaign rallies for September 14 and September 21.

As the 2026 gubernatorial elections approach, Agarwal’s unique blend of progressive ideals and a strong pro-business agenda may resonate with a diverse electorate in California.

Source: Original article

Battery Dance Festival Highlights Indian-American Dance Traditions in New York

The Battery Dance Festival in New York City celebrated India’s Independence Day with a vibrant showcase of Indian dance performances on August 15 at Rockefeller Park.

The Battery Dance Festival marked India’s Independence Day with a free concert featuring a variety of Indian dance forms on August 15 at Rockefeller Park. This event was part of a five-night performance series that included international artists from countries such as the Netherlands, Taiwan, Germany, South Korea, Spain, Indonesia, and the USA.

As New York City’s longest-running free public summer festival, the Battery Dance Festival attracts thousands of attendees who come to enjoy dance against the stunning backdrop of water, sky, and the city skyline. Founded in 1976 by Jonathan Hollander in Lower Manhattan, Battery Dance has become one of America’s leading cultural ambassadors, fostering connections through dance. The festival’s talented dancers also serve as teaching artists and choreographers, creating innovative works that resonate socially and artistically in public spaces.

The India Day performance featured a program titled “Shakthi-Divine Energy,” hosted by Rajika Puri, a scholar and lecturer trained in Bharatanatyam and Odissi. Puri introduced a remarkable lineup of artists, including renowned Odissi dancer Bijayini Satpathy, award-winning choreographer Subhajit Khush Das from Kolkata, Bharatanatyam soloist Sonali Skandan, the Nandanik Dance Troupe from Pittsburgh, the Kalpavruksha Dance Ensemble from New Jersey, NYC’s Malini Srinivasan & Dancers, and Sampradaya Dance Creations from Canada.

The Nandanik Dance Troupe presented an excerpt from their new production, “Dashamahavidya,” which explores the ten incarnations of the mother goddess Shakti. This piece was created by Kolkata-based choreographer Subhajit Khush Das, who also debuted a new work titled “MAA, The Protector,” focusing on the Goddess Kali.

Sonali Skandan showcased her piece “Durga,” which was developed in collaboration with Maya Kulkarni and set to a commissioned musical score. Malini Srinivasan & Dancers performed “Being Becoming,” a tribute to the essence of divine feminine power and creativity. Meanwhile, Sampradaya Dance Creations celebrated the theme of Ardhanarishwara, representing the divine union of Shiva and Shakti.

Bijayini Satpathy, an exponent of Odissi, performed two duets titled “Lāsya: Lathika & Mahamaya.” In an interview with Hari Adivarekar of *India Currents*, she discussed the significance of their performance in relation to India’s Independence Day.

“Our performance, Lasya, celebrates the power of cultural expression by showcasing both the sensuality and strength of the feminine through Odissi—one of India’s classical dance forms rooted in its rich heritage,” Satpathy explained. “As second-generation Indians in the U.S., India’s Independence Day remains meaningful to us, honoring our grandparents who lived through 1947 and our parents who shaped life after it, while keeping these traditions alive and evolving.”

Satpathy emphasized the importance of showcasing Odissi on international platforms like the Battery Dance Festival. “It allows audiences worldwide to experience the depth, nuance, and history of one of India’s prominent dance traditions,” she said. “This creates space for cultural dialogue, ensuring these art forms not only survive but continue to inspire and evolve across borders.”

She also encouraged the Indian community in America to support classical dance, stating, “Supporting classical dance is more than keeping our shared heritage vibrant; it affirms India’s vast cultural imagination, artistic philosophies, and centuries-old dedication to beauty in movement.” Satpathy urged audiences to engage with artists, learn about Indian arts, and support new creations and research.

For the India Independence Day lineup, Battery Dance had initially planned a unique program featuring five dance forms from Kerala, including Mohiniyattam, Theyyam, Kalari Payattu, Kutiyattam, and Kathakali. However, when the original participants were unable to perform, New Jersey’s Kalpavruksha Dance Ensemble stepped in with guest Kathakali dancers from across the U.S. and Canada, presenting the vibrant “Flame of Destiny,” based on the story of Draupadi from the Mahabharata.

Guest artist Uma Kymal, who portrayed Krishna in the Kathakali performance, expressed her gratitude for the opportunity to showcase this traditional art form in New York City. “We were delighted to have been given this incredible opportunity to showcase Kathakali to NYC at this prestigious festival,” Kymal remarked. “The venue was superb, with the Hudson River as a backdrop and a full, enthusiastic, and appreciative audience.”

The Battery Dance Festival continues to be a vital platform for cultural exchange and artistic expression, celebrating the rich tapestry of dance from around the world.

Source: Original article

Potential Discovery of New Dwarf Planet Complicates Planet Nine Theory

Scientists at the Institute for Advanced Study have discovered a large trans-Neptune Object, 2017OF201, which may provide new insights into the elusive Planet Nine theory.

A team of researchers from the Institute for Advanced Study School of Natural Sciences in Princeton, New Jersey, has potentially identified a new dwarf planet that could lend support to the theory of a hypothetical super-planet known as Planet Nine. The scientists announced their findings in a recent news release, revealing the discovery of a trans-Neptune Object (TNO) designated 2017OF201, located in the remote region beyond the Kuiper Belt.

Trans-Neptune Objects are minor planets that orbit the Sun at distances greater than that of Neptune. While many TNOs have been cataloged, 2017OF201 stands out due to its significant size and unusual orbit. The research team, led by Sihao Cheng along with Jiaxuan Li and Eritas Yang from Princeton University, employed advanced computational techniques to trace the object’s unique trajectory in the sky.

“The object’s aphelion—the farthest point in its orbit from the Sun—is more than 1,600 times that of Earth’s orbit,” Cheng explained in the release. “Meanwhile, its perihelion—the closest point in its orbit to the Sun—is 44.5 times that of Earth’s orbit, which is similar to Pluto’s orbit.” The team estimates that 2017OF201 takes approximately 25,000 years to complete one orbit around the Sun. Yang suggested that the object likely experienced close encounters with a giant planet, which may have led to its ejection into a wide orbit.

Cheng further noted that the object’s migration may have involved multiple stages. “It’s possible that this object was first ejected to the Oort Cloud, the most distant region in our solar system, which is home to many comets, and then sent back,” he said.

This discovery could significantly alter current understandings of the outer solar system’s structure. In January 2016, astronomers Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) proposed the existence of a planet approximately 1.5 times the size of Earth residing in the outer solar system. However, Planet Nine remains a theoretical construct, as neither Batygin nor Brown has directly observed such a planet.

The theory posits that Planet Nine could be similar in size to Neptune, located far beyond Pluto in the Kuiper Belt, where 2017OF201 was found. If it exists, this hypothetical planet could possess a mass up to ten times that of Earth and orbit the Sun at a distance up to 30 times greater than that of Neptune. It is estimated that it would take between 10,000 and 20,000 Earth years to complete a single orbit.

Previously, the region beyond the Kuiper Belt was thought to be largely empty, but the discovery of 2017OF201 suggests otherwise. Cheng emphasized the limited visibility of the object, stating, “2017OF201 only has about 1% of its orbit visible to us.” He added, “Even though advances in telescopes have enabled us to explore distant parts of the universe, there is still a great deal to discover about our own solar system.”

Nasa has indicated that if Planet Nine exists, it could help clarify the peculiar orbits of certain smaller objects in the distant Kuiper Belt. As it stands, Planet Nine remains a theoretical concept, with its existence inferred from gravitational patterns observed in the outer solar system.

Source: Original article

FDA Restricts New COVID Vaccine Boosters to High-Risk Americans Only

COVID-19 vaccines are now limited to high-risk groups under new FDA guidelines, as emergency use authorizations have been officially rescinded.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced that COVID-19 vaccines will now be available only to high-risk groups, marking a significant shift in the public health approach to the pandemic. This decision comes as emergency use authorizations for these vaccines have been officially rescinded.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy made the announcement on Wednesday via a post on social media platform X. In his post, he outlined four commitments he had made: to end COVID vaccine mandates, to ensure vaccine availability for those who want them, particularly vulnerable populations, to demand placebo-controlled trials from vaccine manufacturers, and to conclude the emergency status surrounding COVID-19.

“In a series of FDA actions today we accomplished all four goals,” Kennedy stated. He highlighted that the FDA has issued marketing authorization for the following vaccines for high-risk groups: Moderna for individuals aged six months and older, Pfizer for those five years and older, and Novavax for individuals aged 12 and up. Kennedy emphasized that these vaccines will be available to all patients who choose to receive them after consulting with their healthcare providers.

High-risk groups include older adults aged 65 and above, as well as individuals who are more likely to experience severe illness from COVID-19. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies several conditions that may increase the risk of severe COVID illness, including asthma, cancer, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, dementia, mood disorders, obesity, Parkinson’s disease, and chronic diseases affecting the lungs, liver, or kidneys.

In addition to the new marketing authorization, Kennedy also announced the rescindment of emergency use authorizations for COVID vaccines. “The American people demanded science, safety, and common sense,” he remarked. “This framework delivers all three.”

Prior to this change, the CDC had recommended COVID-19 vaccines for all Americans aged six months and older. In May 2025, Kennedy had previously announced that COVID-19 vaccines would be removed from the CDC’s routine immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women.

Instead of a universal recommendation, the CDC’s updated guidance now emphasizes “shared clinical decision-making.” This approach encourages discussions between parents and healthcare providers regarding the benefits and risks of vaccination for each individual case.

Despite the FDA’s new guidelines, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) continues to include COVID-19 vaccines in its annual immunization schedule. Dr. Marc Siegel, a senior medical analyst for Fox News, has previously stated that vaccination decisions should involve a conversation between the pediatrician, the patient, and the parent, taking into account the child’s health and the current state of COVID-19.

As the landscape of COVID-19 vaccination continues to evolve, the focus now shifts to ensuring that high-risk populations receive the necessary protection while allowing for informed decision-making among families and healthcare providers.

Source: Original article

Democrats Seek Unity Against Trump at Conclusion of DNC Meeting

Democrats are striving for unity amid internal divisions and fundraising challenges as the DNC’s summer meeting concludes, focusing on strategies to counter President Trump’s agenda.

MINNEAPOLIS, MN – As the Democratic National Committee (DNC) wraps up its annual summer meeting, Chair Ken Martin is set to emphasize the necessity of party unity. Sources indicate that Martin will highlight the importance of moving forward as a cohesive group, particularly in the face of President Donald Trump’s recent actions since his return to the White House seven months ago.

“In this big tent party of ours, we are unified towards one single goal: to stop Donald Trump and put this country back on track,” Martin stated at the meeting’s opening on Monday.

During his closing address, Martin is expected to reflect on the momentum Democrats have gained heading into the fall elections. He will point to the party’s success in “overperforming or winning in 36 out of 37 key elections” during his tenure as chair, according to a source familiar with the discussions.

However, the DNC faces significant challenges as it seeks to regain its footing after last year’s electoral setbacks, which saw the party lose control of the White House and the Senate while failing to reclaim a House majority. Recent polling indicates a troubling decline in the Democratic brand, particularly among younger voters, with approval ratings hitting all-time lows.

Additionally, the DNC is grappling with a substantial fundraising deficit compared to the Republican National Committee (RNC) and concerns over dwindling party registration numbers.

As Democrats push for a more aggressive stance against Trump’s agenda, Martin has criticized the president’s leadership, describing him as “a dictator-in-chief” and his administration as “fascism dressed in a red tie.” He expressed frustration with the party’s previous approach, stating, “I’m sick and tired of this Democratic Party bringing a pencil to a knife fight.” Martin urged party members to adopt a more combative strategy.

Despite calls for unity, tensions surfaced during the meeting as a key DNC panel debated two conflicting resolutions regarding the Israel-Hamas conflict. The Resolutions Committee voted down a symbolic resolution advocating for an arms embargo and the suspension of U.S. military aid to Israel, a long-standing ally in the Middle East.

In contrast, a separate resolution supported by Martin, which called for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access to Gaza, was unanimously approved. However, the rejection of the more assertive resolution proposed by 26-year-old Allison Minnerly, a new DNC member from Florida, sparked dissent among some committee members.

DNC committee member Sophia Danenberg expressed concern over the party’s stance, stating, “It’s not enough. People want to hear a louder, stronger statement.” She warned that a lack of courage on this issue could jeopardize the party’s future.

Following discussions with Minnerly, Martin requested the committee to withdraw his resolution to foster unity and facilitate further dialogue. “We need to keep working through this. We have to find a path forward as a party, and we have to stay unified,” he remarked, a sentiment that was well-received by the committee.

The debate over the resolutions reflects a broader fracture within the Democratic Party regarding its historical support for Israel, particularly in light of rising concerns over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Recent polling suggests that support for Israel’s military actions is waning among Democrats.

In addition to the Israel resolutions, the committee unanimously approved measures affirming the party’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in response to ongoing conservative backlash against such initiatives. Another resolution condemned the first six months of Trump’s second administration.

These resolutions will be presented for a vote by the full DNC membership during the closing general session on Wednesday.

As the meeting progressed, Martin announced the commencement of the presidential calendar process, indicating that preparations for the 2028 election cycle are underway. He emphasized the need for a rigorous and fair primary process to ensure the selection of a strong candidate capable of leading the party forward.

In the coming months, DNC officials will establish rules for states vying for early positions in the presidential primary calendar. This follows the DNC’s decision to alter traditional lead-off states, with South Carolina now set to kick off the 2024 primaries, as per President Biden’s preferences.

Martin also underscored the importance of maintaining neutrality among DNC officers and staff during what is expected to be a crowded Democratic primary process. “We have an obligation to Democrats not in this room,” he stated, reinforcing the need for impartiality as the party navigates its upcoming electoral challenges.

Source: Original article

IAS Sakshi Sawhney and PCS Rohit Gupta Lead Flood Response in Amritsar

Amritsar district faces severe flooding, prompting Deputy Commissioner Sakshi Sawhney and Additional Deputy Commissioner Rohit Gupta to lead urgent rescue and relief operations, earning community praise for their efforts.

As floodwaters rise across Punjab, Amritsar district has been particularly hard hit, prompting a swift response from local authorities. The administration has mobilized relief and rescue operations on a war footing, with Deputy Commissioner Sakshi Sawhney and Additional Deputy Commissioner Rohit Gupta at the forefront of these efforts.

Heavy rainfall and rising levels of rivulets connected to the Ravi River have inundated several low-lying areas in Ajnala. Families have been evacuated to higher ground as water has entered homes and fields, damaging crops and cutting off access to roads in some regions.

Deputy Commissioner Sawhney has been actively supervising operations throughout the district, coordinating with the Army, National Disaster Response Force (NDRF), and State Disaster Response Force (SDRF). Control rooms have been established to monitor the situation continuously, while boats and relief equipment have been deployed to the most vulnerable areas.

Having previously managed flood relief efforts in Patiala during the 2023 floods, Sawhney is once again directing evacuations and relief operations. Her experience in handling large-scale displacements and hospital rescues has been invaluable in shaping the current response in Amritsar. She has been visiting affected areas daily, engaging with residents and overseeing the operations of relief camps.

Meanwhile, PCS Rohit Gupta has remained on the ground since the onset of the flooding. He has been responsible for overseeing evacuations, ensuring the delivery of food and drinking water, and coordinating medical teams to assist affected families. His presence in remote villages has expedited rescue efforts and provided much-needed reassurance to local residents.

Relief camps have been established in schools and community centers, where displaced families are receiving meals, safe drinking water, and basic medical care. The administration has also initiated disinfection and fogging drives to prevent outbreaks of waterborne diseases once the floodwaters begin to recede.

Residents of Ajnala have expressed gratitude for the active involvement of both Sawhney and Gupta during this crisis. Gurpreet Singh, a local farmer whose crops have been damaged, noted, “It makes a difference when senior officials come to our village and listen to us directly.” Another resident highlighted the swift arrangements made for elderly villagers and children, which have helped them feel safer amid the chaos.

Despite the ongoing efforts, officials have cautioned that the situation remains critical, as rainfall continues in the catchment areas of the Ravi River. The administration has urged residents to avoid entering flooded zones and to cooperate with evacuation teams. Schools in flood-prone areas have been closed until further notice to ensure the safety of students.

According to district authorities, the immediate priority is to safeguard human lives and provide uninterrupted relief in the affected zones. Once the waters recede, the focus will shift to assessing crop damage, repairing roads, and restoring essential services.

For Sawhney, this marks her second major involvement in flood relief operations in three years, following her leadership role in Patiala in 2023. For Gupta, the current situation serves as a critical test of his administrative capabilities in one of Punjab’s most flood-prone subdivisions.

Officials have noted that their combined approach—visible, fearless, and field-oriented—has been instrumental in maintaining public confidence and staying ahead of potential panic during this crisis.

With forecasts indicating more rainfall in the western Himalayas, the administration in Amritsar remains on high alert. For the residents of Ajnala and surrounding areas, the sight of Sawhney and Gupta leading from the front has become a vital source of reassurance as they navigate the challenges posed by the floods.

Source: Original article

Modi Did Not Respond to Trump’s Trade Calls, German Report Says

U.S. President Donald Trump’s attempts to reach Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding trade issues have gone unanswered, reflecting India’s resistance to U.S. tariff pressures and a shift in global relations.

U.S. President Donald Trump has made several attempts to contact Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi concerning ongoing trade disputes, but Modi has not responded, according to a report published Tuesday in the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ).

FAZ, which was founded in 1949 and is considered one of Germany’s most influential newspapers, is known for its center-right, liberal-conservative editorial stance. The publication is often referred to as a “newspaper of record,” and it is widely read by policymakers, business leaders, and diplomats both in Germany and internationally. Its reporting is typically aimed at decision-makers rather than a mass audience.

The report indicates that Trump, who has successfully pressured other nations into concessions through tariffs, is encountering a more formidable opponent in India. While he has previously praised Modi as a “great leader” and posed for photographs with him, the tone from Washington has shifted due to India’s reluctance to comply with U.S. demands.

According to the report, Trump has threatened to impose higher tariffs on India if New Delhi does not grant greater market access for American agricultural products. Despite this pressure, India appears resolute in resisting these demands. FAZ notes that the Indian government is determined not to repeat past experiences where Trump’s negotiating tactics left India at a disadvantage.

The report highlights India’s sensitivity to being treated in what it perceives as an “imperial” manner, a sentiment shaped by its colonial history. As such, India is unwilling to be seen as subordinate to Washington.

At the time of publication, India’s Ministry of External Affairs had not confirmed Trump’s calls. However, in recent weeks, Modi has publicly stated on multiple occasions that he is aware of the potential personal costs of his stance but remains committed to protecting the interests of farmers, the dairy industry, and small and medium enterprises.

On Sunday, The Sunday Guardian published an article detailing how India’s policy establishment has entered “battle mode” to manage increasing pressure from Washington. The article emphasized the coordination among the Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of External Affairs, the Ministry of Defence, and the Ministry of Commerce in crafting a deliberate pushback against U.S. demands. It also noted that India is quietly strengthening its ties with partners such as Russia and China, creating alternative channels to mitigate U.S. influence.

FAZ echoed this sentiment, observing that the breakdown of trust with the U.S. is prompting India to seek closer cooperation with other global powers, including China. This shift signals a recalibration of New Delhi’s external relations.

The report warns that a significant portion of India’s exports to the U.S., including clothing, precious stones, and automotive parts, is at stake in this evolving situation.

Experts suggest that the combination of these reports illustrates a clear pattern: India is not only resisting U.S. tariff pressures but is also actively repositioning itself within the global order, indicating that it will not be rushed or coerced into making concessions.

Source: Original article

Karnataka BJP Demands NIA Investigation into Dharmasthala Conspiracy

BJP State President BY Vijayendra has called for the National Investigation Agency to investigate the controversy surrounding Shri Kshetra Dharmasthala, citing concerns from the Hindu community.

Bengaluru: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) State President and MLA, BY Vijayendra, has urged the Karnataka government to promptly transfer the investigation concerning Shri Kshetra Dharmasthala to the National Investigation Agency (NIA). This demand is made on behalf of millions of devotees and the broader Hindu community.

Speaking at a press conference held at the BJP State Office, Jagannath Bhavan, Vijayendra asserted that an NIA investigation would help restore public confidence among devotees. He called on the Congress-led government and Chief Minister Siddaramaiah to act swiftly on this matter.

To mobilize support for this demand, Vijayendra announced a “Dharmasthala Chalo” movement, which includes a large rally scheduled for Monday, September 1, 2025, in Dharmasthala. He encouraged the entire Hindu community across the state to participate in this event, aimed at protesting actions perceived to have hurt Hindu sentiments while advocating for an NIA investigation. He expressed optimism that a significant turnout from every Assembly constituency and district would make the rally a momentous occasion.

On the day of the rally, devotees are encouraged to visit local temples in their towns and villages, offer prayers, and partake in processions before heading to Dharmasthala. A substantial gathering is planned for 2:00 PM in Dharmasthala, intended to raise awareness about the ongoing issue and to issue a warning to the state government.

Vijayendra criticized the government’s handling of the Dharmasthala situation, claiming it has damaged its reputation. He emphasized the necessity of a thorough investigation by the NIA to uncover the organizations and malicious forces allegedly behind the controversy. He cautioned that such forces could potentially target other Hindu temples in a similar manner.

Questioning the Chief Minister’s urgency in addressing the Dharmasthala issue, Vijayendra pointed out that the government should have first gathered information regarding the individual who made the allegations and the organizations supporting them. He suggested that the state intelligence or police should have conducted a preliminary investigation before any decisions were made.

The Dharmasthala issue has ignited extensive discussions at state, national, and international levels over the past month. Vijayendra criticized the Congress government and Chief Minister Siddaramaiah for announcing a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe based on a single complaint without thorough due diligence.

Vijayendra also raised concerns about the Chief Minister’s inconsistent decisions. Initially, the government indicated that the Dakshina Kannada police would handle the investigation. However, the following day, it was announced that the case would not be assigned to the SIT. By Sunday, the Chief Minister reversed his position again, declaring an SIT probe. Vijayendra questioned the reasons behind this abrupt change in stance and demanded transparency regarding the influences on the Chief Minister’s decisions.

While refraining from commenting on the Chief Minister’s personal beliefs or his reverence for Dharmasthala’s deities, Shri Manjunatheshwara and Shri Annappa Swamy, Vijayendra emphasized that Dharmasthala is a sacred pilgrimage site for millions of devotees. He expressed hope that the Chief Minister recognizes the significance of this revered location.

In drawing parallels with the tragic stampede incident at Chinnaswamy Stadium, where 11 lives were lost and many others were injured due to the government’s publicity-driven actions, Vijayendra accused the Chief Minister of making hasty decisions regarding the Dharmasthala matter. He highlighted that misinformation circulating on social media has deeply affected the sentiments of countless devotees, leading to widespread distress.

The BJP is urging the state government to assign the investigation to the NIA to ensure a fair and thorough probe, restore public confidence, and protect the sanctity of Shri Kshetra Dharmasthala.

Source: Original article

Axel, DACA Recipient, Works to Protect His Community

Axel Herrera, a DACA recipient in North Carolina, faces increasing challenges as local police checkpoints instill fear in his community, prompting him to take action for those affected by immigration policies.

Since the election of President Trump, Axel Herrera has witnessed a troubling rise in local police traffic checkpoints throughout his North Carolina community. Although Axel, a recipient of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), has legal protection from deportation, many of his friends and family members have been detained or deported following random traffic stops. This reality has left numerous undocumented individuals in his community living in constant fear. “It’s creating a hostile environment,” Axel states. “It’s pretty clear what the government is trying to do.”

At 27 years old, Axel has called North Carolina home since he was seven, when his family fled Honduras in search of a better life. Receiving DACA status felt like a significant achievement for Axel and his family, allowing him to pursue opportunities that once seemed out of reach. He earned a scholarship to Duke University, becoming the first in his family to attend college, and graduated with multiple accolades, including a prestigious Congressional internship.

Following his graduation, Axel took on the role of civic engagement director for Mi Familia en Acción, a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting Hispanic communities. Over the years, he has focused on registering citizens to vote, developing youth programs, and mentoring immigrants as they navigate educational and professional pathways. “All I ever wanted was to belong, and to give something back,” he reflects.

However, the current political climate has posed significant challenges for Axel and others like him. Ongoing legal battles surrounding DACA threaten to undermine his protection from deportation. Axel must renew his DACA status and employment authorization every two years. Although he managed to process his paperwork just before Trump took office, he remains uncertain about the future of his status when it expires in 2026. He is aware that some Dreamers are struggling to have their applications processed, and the Trump administration has already deported at least one DACA recipient under the pretense of an outstanding deportation order. “Right now, everything is up in the air,” Axel admits. “I’m very concerned about the future.”

One potential outcome is that courts may uphold DACA but revoke the work authorization for its recipients. Given this uncertainty, Axel has decided to step away from his hard-earned job and return to school. This fall, he will leave North Carolina for Yale University, where he has received a scholarship to study business and public policy. “It’s a great opportunity, but also a hedge against losing my status,” he explains. “If I lose my work authorization, then being a student might buy me some time and let me find a different path forward.”

Despite his current protections, Axel feels conflicted about leaving his community behind. Many of his friends and family are constantly communicating via WhatsApp, assessing police conditions whenever they step outside. He knows several young Venezuelans whose humanitarian parole was recently revoked, rendering them unable to work or study. Over the past six months, he has witnessed families torn apart by raids and deportations, or who are simply too afraid of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to pursue education. “I speak all the time with young people whose whole future is on the chopping block,” Axel shares.

Yet, even with his protections, Axel acknowledges a pervasive anxiety. “There’s this looming sense that things could get worse fast,” he says. Under the Trump administration, anti-immigrant sentiment and policies have become more entrenched. He is particularly concerned about the long-term implications of a new state law that mandates sheriffs to cooperate with ICE. Axel fears for his family’s future, stating, “After 20 years, we’re barely scratching the surface of dealing with our status issues. It never ends—and the Trump administration is rolling back so much of the progress we’ve made.”

Source: Original article

Sunil Gavaskar Critiques Asia Cup Squad Selection Debate

Sunil Gavaskar criticized foreign cricketers for disparaging Indian cricket, asserting they are merely trying to profit from their comments.

Sunil Gavaskar, the legendary Indian cricketer, has voiced strong criticism against overseas players who he believes are undermining Indian cricket. He accused them of “throwing dirt” on the sport in India while attempting to profit from their remarks.

Gavaskar’s comments come in the context of ongoing debates surrounding the selection of the Indian squad for the Asia Cup. The former cricketer has been a vocal advocate for the integrity of Indian cricket, often defending its players and the decisions made by the selection committee.

In recent years, several international cricketers have made headlines for their controversial statements regarding Indian players and the cricketing system in India. Gavaskar argues that these comments are often motivated by a desire to gain attention or financial benefit rather than a genuine concern for the sport.

He emphasized that Indian cricket has a rich history and a strong following, and it should not be tarnished by the opinions of those who do not fully understand its nuances. Gavaskar’s remarks serve as a reminder of the pride many Indian cricketers feel for their national team and the sport as a whole.

As discussions around the Asia Cup squad continue, Gavaskar’s sharp critique highlights the tensions that can arise in the world of cricket, especially when it comes to national pride and the influence of foreign voices.

His passionate defense of Indian cricket resonates with fans and players alike, reinforcing the notion that the sport is not just a game but a significant part of India’s cultural identity.

Gavaskar’s legacy as a cricketer and commentator positions him as a key figure in these discussions, and his insights are often sought after by both the media and cricket enthusiasts.

As the Asia Cup approaches, the focus will remain on the players selected to represent India, but Gavaskar’s comments remind everyone of the broader context in which these discussions take place.

In a sport that often sees players from different nations engaging in friendly banter, Gavaskar’s call for respect and understanding underscores the importance of valuing the contributions of Indian cricket while also acknowledging the perspectives of international players.

Ultimately, the debate surrounding the Asia Cup squad is just one of many instances where the intersection of national pride and international scrutiny plays out in the world of cricket.

As fans eagerly await the tournament, Gavaskar’s words will likely echo in the minds of many, serving as a rallying cry for those who cherish the legacy of Indian cricket.

Source: Original article

Flesh-Eating Parasite Case Reported in U.S. Traveler from Central America

The CDC has confirmed a case of human screwworm infection in Maryland linked to a Central American outbreak, but officials say the risk to public health is very low.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has confirmed the first case of a travel-associated human screwworm infection in Maryland. This case is linked to an outbreak in Central America, specifically in El Salvador.

Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for the Maryland Department of Health and Human Services, informed Fox News Digital that the patient had recently returned from El Salvador, a country currently experiencing a screwworm outbreak. The CDC collaborated with state health officials to investigate the case.

On August 4, the CDC confirmed the diagnosis after experts analyzed images of the larvae. Nixon emphasized that “the risk to public health in the United States from this introduction is very low.”

The New World screwworm, also known as myiasis, is a parasitic infestation caused by fly larvae that feed on living flesh. According to the CDC, individuals can contract myiasis when female flies deposit their eggs on or near a person’s wounds, nose, or ears. The condition can also be transmitted through ticks and mosquitoes that carry the fly’s eggs.

As the larvae grow and consume flesh, a lump develops in the infected person’s tissues. Health experts warn that if left untreated, myiasis can be fatal.

The CDC notes that myiasis is not common in the United States. Most cases diagnosed in the U.S. involve individuals who have traveled to tropical regions where the condition is more prevalent. Livestock, including cattle, sheep, and goats, are particularly susceptible to this parasite, making it a significant economic concern.

In recent reports, Reuters highlighted that the CDC had confirmed a case of New World screwworm in Maryland from a traveler returning from Guatemala. However, the discrepancy regarding the origin of the case remains unverified.

This summer, USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins announced plans to establish a sterile fly facility in Texas aimed at combating the screwworm pest. A potential outbreak in Texas could lead to an estimated economic loss of $1.8 billion due to livestock deaths, labor costs, and medication expenses.

As of now, there have been no confirmed animal cases of screwworm infection in the U.S. this year. Fox News Digital has reached out to the USDA for further comments on the situation.

Source: Original article

New Study Finds Leprosy in the Americas Predated European Arrival

The discovery of Mycobacterium lepromatosis suggests that leprosy existed in the Americas long before European explorers arrived, reshaping the historical understanding of the disease.

Recent research indicates that a species of bacteria has significantly altered the timeline of leprosy’s presence in the Americas. Contrary to previous beliefs that the disease, also known as Hansen’s disease, was introduced by European explorers, findings suggest that leprosy was already endemic among Indigenous populations long before their arrival.

Scientists from the Institut Pasteur in Paris, France, in collaboration with a U.S. university, announced their findings in a news release. They revealed that a second species of bacteria, Mycobacterium lepromatosis, is responsible for leprosy in the Americas. Historically, it was thought that Mycobacterium leprae was the sole cause of the disease and that it was spread by early European settlers.

The revelation of Mycobacterium lepromatosis challenges this long-held belief, as it indicates that this strain of bacteria had been infecting humans for approximately 1,000 years prior to European contact. Dr. Maria Lopopolo, the first author of the study and a researcher at the Laboratory of Microbial Paleogenomics at the Institut Pasteur, emphasized the significance of this discovery.

“This discovery transforms our understanding of the history of leprosy in America. It shows that a form of the disease was already endemic among Indigenous populations well before the Europeans arrived,” Dr. Lopopolo stated in the release.

The study, which involved researchers from the Laboratory of Microbial Paleogenomics at the Institut Pasteur, the French National Center for Scientific Research, and the University of Colorado, began after Mycobacterium lepromatosis was identified in a Mexican patient in 2008 and in red squirrels in the British Isles in 2016.

Using advanced genetic techniques, scientists reconstructed the genomes of Mycobacterium lepromatosis from ancient individuals in Argentina and Canada. Their analysis revealed that the two strains from these different regions were closely related within the Mycobacterium genome family tree, suggesting that the bacteria spread rapidly throughout the continent.

The findings confirm that Mycobacterium lepromatosis had already disseminated across North and South America prior to European exploration. The research team collaborated with Indigenous communities, various international institutions, and archaeologists, studying over 800 DNA samples from ancient human remains and recent medical cases of leprosy.

Nicolás Rascovan, the lead author of the study at the Institut Pasteur, remarked on the implications of their research. “We are just beginning to uncover the diversity and global movements of this recently identified pathogen,” he said. “This study allows us to hypothesize that there might be unknown animal reservoirs.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notes that leprosy can affect the nerves, skin, and eyes of patients, but it is treatable with antibiotics. Currently, there are up to 225 reported cases in the U.S. and approximately 250,000 cases worldwide, according to the CDC.

This groundbreaking study not only reshapes the historical narrative surrounding leprosy in the Americas but also opens new avenues for understanding the disease’s origins and its impact on Indigenous populations.

Source: Original article

Redistricting Conflicts Challenge Minority Voting Power and Democratic Trust

Redistricting battles in the U.S. threaten minority voting power and undermine public trust in democracy as political parties manipulate district maps for electoral advantage.

Redistricting—the process of redrawing congressional maps after each census—is intended to promote fairness and accurate representation. However, in today’s polarized political climate, it has become one of the most contentious issues in U.S. politics. At its core, the issue is straightforward: the party that controls the redistricting process often dictates the outcome of elections. Currently, Republicans in Texas and Democrats in California are wielding redistricting as a tool to secure more congressional seats, raising concerns about the erosion of democratic principles and public trust in the electoral system.

The urgency of the situation was underscored during an August 22 briefing by American Community Media (ACoM), where experts discussed the potential consequences of proposed map changes. Texas has aggressively pursued redrawing its congressional districts with the aim of adding five Republican-dominated districts, a strategy designed to flip the House in the 2026 midterm elections.

State Representative Gene Wu, the Democratic Leader in the Texas House, has characterized this effort as “cheating.” He argues that Republicans are responsible for policies leading to significant price increases, job losses, and a looming recession. “Here’s the problem. If this is allowed to happen across the board, if every state, whether they’re red or blue, does this every single time after every election, politicians and leaders will no longer listen to the people,” Rep. Wu explains. “Why would they need to listen when they’re guaranteed to win every time?”

At the heart of the redistricting debate is the potential dilution of minority voting power, which directly impacts communities of color. This dilution occurs through two primary tactics: packing and cracking. Packing involves concentrating too many minority voters into a single district, allowing them to win decisively in that district but diminishing their influence elsewhere. For instance, in Houston, two historically strong Black districts are being merged into one that is 80% Black. This change means the community would elect only one Black representative instead of two, effectively halving their overall representation.

Cracking, on the other hand, involves dispersing minority communities across multiple districts dominated by white voters. In regions like South Texas and Dallas, Latino voters have spent years building political power. However, the new maps fracture their communities, splitting them into separate districts, thereby diminishing their collective voice. As Rep. Wu succinctly puts it, “They can vote all they want. They’ll never be able to change the outcome of any election.”

Thomas Saenz, President and General Counsel at the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), emphasizes that Texas has previously manipulated the rules during the 2021 redistricting process to solidify Republican control. The resulting map ignored the state’s rapid demographic changes, providing Republicans with an unfair advantage.

Now, with the push for five additional GOP seats, Saenz argues that Texas is blatantly violating the Voting Rights Act. He points out that the growth of Latino and other communities of color in Texas since 2020 has outpaced that of the white community. In a fair system, this demographic growth should translate into increased political power for those communities. Instead, the new maps are designed to suppress that power, effectively erasing the gains that should accompany population growth.

In California, Governor Gavin Newsom has responded with his own aggressive strategy. He has pushed legislation to suspend the state’s independent redistricting commission and place a new Democratic-leaning map on the November ballot, aiming to secure up to five additional House seats. Newsom describes this approach as “fighting fire with fire,” framing it as a necessary countermeasure to the gerrymandering tactics employed by Republicans in Texas.

Sam Wang, Director of the Electoral Innovation Lab at Princeton University, notes that while there are standards for racial fairness in redistricting, they are not uniformly applied across states. The Supreme Court has ruled that partisan redistricting is unconstitutional but has refrained from taking action to address it. This lack of oversight means that state-level actions and laws are crucial in tackling voting rights issues. Wang explains that Texas, lacking state laws governing redistricting, operates in a “Wild West” environment, leaving legislative Democrats with few options other than denying a quorum. In contrast, states like California, Michigan, Colorado, Arizona, Virginia, and New Jersey have established independent commissions or other mechanisms to ensure fairer redistricting processes.

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF), represented by Assistant Counsel Sara Rohani, is actively fighting against unfair redistricting practices across the nation. Following the 2020 census, which revealed significant growth among voters of color, many states redrew their maps without a key safeguard from the Voting Rights Act that the Supreme Court struck down in 2013. Without this protection, numerous states enacted maps that weakened Black and Latino voting power.

While courts have invalidated discriminatory maps in states such as Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and Louisiana, the battles continue. Alabama has openly defied a Supreme Court order and is now attempting to dismantle the Voting Rights Act itself. In Louisiana, a newly proposed Black-majority district, which should have expanded representation, is being challenged as a “racial gerrymander” and has been sent back to court. Rohani explains that the LDF is now compelled not only to sue against unfair maps but also to defend fair ones from being dismantled.

Despite these challenges, experts agree on one crucial point: voter turnout remains the most potent weapon against gerrymandering. When minority communities mobilize and vote in large numbers, they can effectively counteract suppression efforts.

Source: Original article

Behind the Controversy of Redrawing Texas Political Maps

Texas is embroiled in a contentious political battle over redistricting, raising concerns about representation and the voices of marginalized communities ahead of the 2026 elections.

The Lone Star State is currently facing a political firestorm that extends beyond party control; it delves into the fundamental issue of representation. The ongoing debate centers on whose voices are amplified and whose are marginalized in the electoral process.

On August 14, a briefing hosted by American Community Media (ACoM) brought together state lawmakers, civil rights lawyers, and advocates to address what they term a “redistricting war.” The focus of this conflict is the Republican-led initiative to redraw Texas’s electoral maps, a move critics argue is designed to benefit the party in the upcoming 2026 elections while undermining the voting power of Black, Latino, and Asian communities.

Texas State Representative Gene Wu, who participated in the briefing from Chicago, highlighted the urgency of the situation. Wu, along with numerous Democratic colleagues, had previously staged a dramatic walkout on August 3 to block a quorum and stall the redistricting bill. “This isn’t just politics—it’s cheating,” Wu asserted. “They’re trying to rewrite the rules mid-game because they know they’re losing.”

Wu elaborated on the tactics being employed in the redistricting process, describing them as “cracking and packing.” He explained, “They’re cracking minority communities into pieces and attaching them to districts that don’t share their interests. Or they’re packing us into one district, so we can’t influence others. Either way, it’s about silencing us.”

He raised a critical alarm about the implications of these changes: “If this goes through, your voice will carry less weight. If you’re Latino, your vote might count as one-third of a white vote. If you’re Black, maybe one-fifth. That’s not democracy.” Wu warned that if such practices are allowed to continue, it could set a dangerous precedent for redistricting efforts across the country. “If they get away with this, every state will start redrawing maps after every election they don’t like. That’s the end of our republic,” he cautioned.

The concerns surrounding the redistricting process are echoed by Karla Maradiaga, a voting rights attorney with the Texas Civil Rights Project. Maradiaga recounted her experience at a redistricting hearing in Houston, where nearly 1,000 individuals signed up to speak despite the maps not yet being released. “People showed up anyway,” she noted, emphasizing the community’s concern over the lack of transparency in the process.

Maradiaga criticized the current redistricting efforts as being driven by political pressures rather than the needs of the community or census data. “This process should be open and fair,” she stated. “Instead, it’s being driven by a letter from the DOJ under Trump.”

She also addressed the misconception surrounding partisan gerrymandering, clarifying that while Republicans assert it is legal, the Supreme Court has not endorsed it. “The Supreme Court didn’t say it’s OK. It said it’s not their job to fix it. That’s a big difference,” she explained. Maradiaga is currently pursuing legal challenges against the redistricting efforts, including a case in Tarrant County where a predominantly minority district was dismantled, resulting in the removal of a Black woman commissioner from office. “We’re fighting back,” she affirmed. “Because this is about protecting the right to vote.”

Melissa Ayala, a longtime activist and resident of Congressional District 29, shared her personal experiences regarding the impact of the new maps on her community. “We’re a working-class, mostly Latino district,” she said. “Now they’ve redrawn it into a weird box that favors Republicans. It’s clear parts we were left out on purpose.”

Ayala, who previously worked as a census worker, understands the importance of accurate representation. “I learned about redistricting through the census. But now, even older folks are just learning how it works—and how it affects them,” she remarked. She highlighted the economic pressures that hinder families from staying politically engaged, stating, “Groceries are up. Cars are expensive. People are just trying to survive. But we still need to vote. We still need to organize.”

Her message was clear: “We’re not just voters—we’re also on the menu. If we don’t fight back, we’ll be served up.”

Carmela Walker, Program Manager at the Houston Area Urban League, emphasized the high stakes for Black communities in this redistricting battle. “This isn’t just about race—it’s about humanity,” Walker said. “When you lose your voice, you lose your ability to fight for schools, healthcare, safety—everything.”

Walker shared troubling accounts of families facing mistreatment in schools and communities without representation. “We got a call about a mom who was arrested just for sitting with her child in the cafeteria. That’s what happens when you don’t have representation,” she recounted.

She called for unity and civic education, asserting that fairness is a civic value that transcends partisanship and race. “No one’s coming to save us. We have to save ourselves,” she urged, emphasizing the need for community solidarity.

Despite the grim outlook, the speakers at the briefing remained united in their call to action: stay engaged, stay vocal, and keep voting. In closing remarks, Wu advocated for “trigger laws” in blue states like California to counter Texas’s redistricting moves. Maradiaga reiterated the importance of litigation, while Ayala urged for more town halls and grassroots organizing. Walker reminded attendees that “we’re stronger together.”

Source: Original article

Democrats Debate Israel-Hamas Conflict and Dark Money at DNC Meeting

Democratic Party officials gathered in Minnesota for their annual meeting, facing internal divisions over the Gaza war and campaign finance reforms while emphasizing unity against former President Donald Trump.

Democratic Party officials and committee members convened in Minnesota on Monday for their annual summer meeting, where they engaged in discussions about competing positions regarding the ongoing war in Gaza and the need for campaign finance reforms.

The meeting commenced with a call for unity against former President Donald Trump, despite the underlying tensions within the party. “We are unified towards one single goal: to stop Donald Trump and put this country back on track,” declared DNC Chair Ken Martin to the more than 400 elected officials from all 50 states and seven territories.

While the Democrats appeared to rally around the objective of countering Trump’s controversial actions since his return to the White House, divisions among committee members were anticipated to surface during the discussions scheduled for Tuesday.

On the agenda was the ongoing conflict in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, alongside the issue of limiting dark money in presidential politics. The DNC’s Resolutions Committee was set to meet, where competing symbolic resolutions regarding the Gaza war would be voted on. This conflict was ignited by Hamas’s surprise attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, which resulted in nearly 1,200 Israeli deaths and over 250 hostages taken. In the aftermath, Israel’s military response has led to the deaths of over 60,000 Palestinians.

The Democratic Party’s historically strong support for Israel has begun to fracture amid rising concerns over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, particularly among the party’s progressive base. Recent polling indicates a significant decline in support for Israel’s military actions among Democrats.

One resolution, which Martin supports, calls for a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas. In contrast, a competing resolution advocates for an arms embargo and the suspension of U.S. military aid to Israel, a long-standing ally in the Middle East.

Another resolution expected to generate significant debate is Martin’s proposal for the DNC to reaffirm its commitment to eliminating unlimited corporate and dark money in the presidential nominating process, starting with the 2028 cycle. This initiative aims to create a new panel that will propose enforceable measures to curb the influence of dark money in the party’s primary elections.

As the influence of super PACs, which can accept unlimited contributions but must disclose their donors, has grown in recent election cycles, the call for reform has gained traction among party leaders.

Democratic leaders are gathering at a critical time for the party, which is attempting to recover from significant electoral losses in the previous year. The Democrats lost control of the White House and Senate and fell short in their efforts to regain a House majority. Additionally, Republicans have made gains among voter demographics that were once key to the Democratic base.

The situation has only worsened for the Democrats in the ten months following those electoral setbacks. The party’s brand has become increasingly unpopular, particularly among younger voters, as national surveys show approval ratings at all-time lows. The DNC is also facing a substantial fundraising deficit compared to the Republican National Committee (RNC), with voter registration data indicating a decline in Democratic Party registrations while GOP sign-ups have increased in 30 states that register voters by party.

Amid these challenges, Martin and other party leaders emphasized the importance of unity. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz addressed committee members, stating, “There’s a division in my damn house, and we’re still married, and things are good. That’s life… We are strong because we challenge each other.”

Longtime Democratic strategist and DNC committee member Maria Cardona echoed this sentiment, expressing frustration over the focus on internal conflicts. “I’m so sick of people focusing on the infighting and the circular firing squad. All of that is crap when we have real issues, existential threats that we need to fight about, and we are all united on that front and that’s all that matters,” she said.

Martin, who was elected DNC chair in February, has navigated considerable turmoil during his tenure, including controversy surrounding former vice chair David Hogg’s support for primary challengers against older House Democrats in secure blue districts.

In response to the DNC’s summer meeting, RNC communications director Zach Parkinson criticized Martin’s leadership, stating, “Under Ken Martin’s leadership, Democrats have sunk to their lowest approval rating in 35 years.” He added that Republicans view Martin’s leadership positively, suggesting they would endorse him to continue as DNC Chair.

Source: Original article

Severe Weather Causes Landslides, Flooding, and Snowfall in J&K and Ladakh

Severe weather in Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh has led to landslides, flooding, and heavy snowfall, disrupting daily life and prompting emergency advisories and rescue preparations.

Srinagar: Recent weather conditions across Jammu and Kashmir, including the Union Territory of Ladakh, have drastically changed, resulting in widespread disruption and heightened concerns in both regions.

In the Jammu province, numerous areas have been impacted by landslides and flash flooding, particularly in hilly terrains and along vulnerable highway stretches. Road connectivity has been severely affected in parts of Ramban, Doda, and Poonch districts, where heavy rains have triggered landslides that blocked major routes.

Meanwhile, in the Kashmir Valley, continuous rainfall has disrupted normal life in both urban and rural areas. Waterlogging has been reported in several urban locations, while rural and mountainous zones are increasingly worried about soil erosion and slope instability.

In Ladakh, the Kargil district has experienced its first significant snowfall of the season. Since last evening, Zanskar and surrounding areas have received heavy snow, with approximately one foot recorded in the hilly regions of Kargil and Zanskar. Lower plains have seen about six inches of snow accumulation, and fresh snowfall continues as temperatures drop sharply.

The Meteorological Department has issued a weather advisory for the upper reaches of Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh, warning of ongoing precipitation and potential disruptions. Residents in vulnerable zones have been advised to remain indoors and adhere to guidelines issued by local administrations and disaster management authorities.

Authorities are on high alert and closely monitoring the evolving situation. Rescue teams and road clearance machinery have been prepared in sensitive areas as a precautionary measure.

According to The Sunday Guardian, the severe weather has prompted a coordinated response from local authorities to mitigate risks and ensure public safety.

Source: Original article

Australia Expels Iranian Diplomats Over Allegations of Antisemitic Attacks

Australia is expelling Iranian diplomats after intelligence links the Islamic Republic to recent antisemitic attacks in Sydney and Melbourne.

The Australian government has announced the expulsion of two Iranian diplomats, citing credible intelligence that suggests the Islamic Republic was involved in a series of antisemitic attacks in Sydney and Melbourne.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese addressed reporters, revealing that the country’s primary domestic intelligence agency, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), had gathered sufficient evidence to reach a “deeply disturbing conclusion.” He stated, “The Iranian government directed at least two of these attacks,” referencing incidents at a Sydney restaurant and a Melbourne synagogue.

Albanese emphasized that Iran had attempted to obscure its involvement, but ASIO assessed that the Islamic Republic was indeed behind the attacks. The Australian government communicated the decision to expel the diplomats to Iran’s ambassador shortly before the public announcement.

In a related move, Australia has also withdrawn its diplomats stationed in Iran, relocating them to a third country for safety reasons. This decision follows a noticeable rise in antisemitic incidents in both Melbourne and Sydney, which escalated after the October 7, 2023, massacre in Israel that sparked an ongoing military offensive in Gaza.

In addition to the expulsions, Prime Minister Albanese indicated that Australia intends to designate Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization. This announcement aligns with Australia’s recent plans to recognize Palestinian statehood at the upcoming United Nations General Assembly in September.

The recognition of Palestinian statehood has drawn sharp criticism from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who accused Australia of betraying Israel. He stated, “History will remember Albanese for what he is: A weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia’s Jews.”

As tensions continue to rise, the Australian government remains firm in its stance against antisemitism and the actions of the Iranian government, seeking to protect its citizens and uphold its international commitments.

Source: Original article

Astronauts Return to Earth After ISS Mission to Relieve Stranded Crew

A NASA crew, including astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, successfully splashed down in the Pacific after a mission to the ISS, marking the agency’s first Pacific landing in 50 years.

NASA astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, along with two international crew members, made a historic splashdown in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of California on Saturday. This marked NASA’s first such landing in 50 years.

The crew, which included Japan’s Takuya Onishi and Russia’s Kirill Peskov, returned to Earth at 11:33 a.m. ET in a SpaceX capsule. This event was notable not only for its significance to NASA but also as the third crewed splashdown for SpaceX.

The last time NASA astronauts splashed down in the Pacific was during the Apollo-Soyuz mission in 1975, which was the first crewed international space mission involving American and Soviet astronauts.

The astronauts launched in March to relieve their colleagues, Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, who had been stranded at the International Space Station (ISS) for nine months. Their extended stay was due to issues with the Boeing Starliner capsule, which experienced thruster problems and helium leaks.

NASA determined that returning Wilmore and Williams to Earth in the Starliner would be too risky, leading to the decision for the Starliner to return without crew. Wilmore and Williams eventually returned home in a SpaceX capsule after their replacements arrived.

In a poignant reflection before departing the ISS, McClain expressed hope that their mission would serve as a reminder of the potential for collaboration and exploration during challenging times. “We want this mission, our mission, to be a reminder of what people can do when we work together, when we explore together,” she said.

Upon their return, McClain mentioned her eagerness to relax and enjoy some downtime, while her crewmates looked forward to indulging in hot showers and burgers.

Earlier this year, SpaceX made the strategic decision to shift their splashdowns from Florida to California. This change was implemented to minimize the risk of debris falling on populated areas during the landing process.

After exiting the spacecraft, the crew underwent medical checks before being transported via helicopter to meet a NASA aircraft bound for Houston.

“Overall, the mission went great, glad to have the crew back,” said Steve Stich, manager of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, during a press conference following the splashdown. “SpaceX did a great job of recovering the crew again on the West Coast.”

Dina Contella, deputy manager for NASA’s International Space Station program, expressed her satisfaction with the crew’s return, stating, “I was pretty happy to see the Crew 10 team back on Earth. They looked great, and they are doing great.”

During their 146 days at the ISS, the crew orbited the Earth 2,368 times and traveled over 63 million miles.

Source: Original article

Trump Urges Grassley to Address Democrats on Judicial Nominee Blockages

President Trump criticized the Senate’s blue slip tradition, claiming it undermines his judicial appointment powers and calling for a change in how nominees are handled.

President Donald Trump expressed strong discontent with the Senate’s “blue slip” tradition during a recent statement, labeling it an unconstitutional barrier to his appointment powers. He argued that this practice effectively grants Democrats veto power over his judicial nominees and U.S. attorney appointments.

Trump’s remarks came on Sunday as he highlighted his frustrations, stating that his rights have been “completely taken away” in states with a single Democratic senator. This assertion underscores his belief that the blue slip process hinders his ability to nominate judges and U.S. Attorneys effectively.

U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, who has defended the century-old blue slip tradition, views it as an essential norm that ensures balance and state input in the judicial nomination process. Grassley’s position reflects a commitment to preserving a system that has been in place for many years, despite Trump’s criticisms.

The blue slip tradition allows senators to express their approval or disapproval of a judicial nominee from their state. While it is a long-standing custom, it is not enshrined in law. Constitutionally, the president has the authority to nominate candidates, but the Senate retains the ultimate power to approve or reject those nominations.

Trump’s dissatisfaction with the blue slip practice is not a new development. Back in July, he referred to the tradition as a “hoax” and a “scam” that Democrats use to obstruct his nominees. He urged Grassley to cease supporting such practices, arguing that they prevent the president from appointing his preferred candidates.

In a pointed statement, Trump remarked, “Put simply, the president of the United States will never be permitted to appoint the person of his choice because of an ancient, and probably unconstitutional, ‘CUSTOM.’” His comments reflect a growing impatience with the nomination process, particularly as he seeks to fill judicial vacancies.

During his first term, Trump successfully appointed 234 federal judges, including three Supreme Court justices and 54 appellate court judges. However, his current term has seen a significant slowdown, with only five confirmations in the first seven months.

In his recent comments, Trump suggested that he is willing to exert pressure on Grassley and the Senate to expedite the nomination process. He stated, “The only candidates that I can get confirmed for these most important positions are, believe it or not, Democrats! Chuck Grassley should allow strong Republican candidates to ascend to these very vital and powerful roles, and tell the Democrats, as they often tell us, to go to HELL!”

These remarks come on the heels of a ruling by U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann, which determined that Alina Habba had unlawfully served as acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey beyond the 120-day limit set for temporary prosecutors. This ruling highlighted the administration’s use of unconventional methods to maintain her position.

Trump’s ongoing pressure campaign could significantly influence the number of judicial vacancies he is able to fill in the coming months, as he continues to advocate for a more streamlined nomination process.

Source: Original article

Google and Trump Administration Strike AI Deal for Federal Agencies

Google has reached an agreement with the Trump administration to implement its artificial intelligence platform across federal agencies, enhancing the U.S. government’s technological capabilities.

The General Services Administration (GSA) announced on Thursday a new partnership with Google aimed at deploying its suite of artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud services throughout the federal government. This agreement marks a significant step in integrating advanced technology into governmental operations.

This initiative aligns with President Donald Trump’s broader strategy to maintain the United States’ position as the leading force in AI development globally. In July, a gathering of prominent figures in American technology celebrated the launch of this ambitious plan, which seeks to bolster the nation’s defenses against emerging threats, particularly from nations like China.

As the digital landscape evolves, the challenges posed by cybercriminals also intensify. Hackers are continually devising new methods to deceive users, often employing phishing tactics that target browsers’ security measures. Although major browsers and search engines, including Google Chrome, actively work to combat these threats, they depend heavily on automated systems to manage the overwhelming volume of malicious activities online.

In a related development, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently announced the company’s commitment to developing a personal superintelligence aimed at enhancing creative and leisurely pursuits for users. This move reflects a growing trend among tech giants to harness AI for more personalized and user-friendly applications.

As AI technology continues to advance, it presents both challenges and opportunities for individuals and organizations alike. The ongoing collaboration between Google and the federal government is expected to play a crucial role in shaping the future of AI in the United States.

For those interested in staying informed about the latest advancements in AI technology, Fox News offers resources to explore the evolving landscape and its implications for society.

Source: Original article

British Foreign Secretary Faces Backlash Over Fishing Trip with JD Vance

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy faced scrutiny after receiving a warning for fishing without a license during a visit with U.S. Vice President JD Vance at his country estate.

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy recently found himself in a bit of trouble after a fishing trip with U.S. Vice President JD Vance. The issue arose not from the discussions between the two politicians, but rather from a violation of fishing regulations.

According to the Environment Agency, Lammy received a written warning for fishing without a license. This incident came to light on Friday, following the visit where Lammy had invited Vance and his family to his country estate located south of London. The trip included a photo opportunity at a nearby river, as well as a bilateral meeting to discuss various international issues.

In the UK, anyone over the age of 13 is required to possess a fishing license to fish in freshwater. The Environment Agency did not disclose whether Vance had a fishing license, citing privacy concerns. However, had Lammy been fined for the violation, he could have faced a penalty of nearly $4,000.

In response to the warning, Lammy promptly purchased a fishing license and reported the incident to the agency. A spokesperson for Lammy characterized the situation as an “administrative error.”

During the fishing trip, Lammy had previously shared with reporters that Vance offered him “Kentucky-style” fishing tips. Despite this advice, Lammy was unable to catch any fish, which Vance humorously noted, saying, “The one strain on the special relationship is that all of my kids caught fish, but the foreign secretary did not.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to both Vance and the Environment Agency for further comment on the matter.

This incident highlights the importance of adhering to local regulations, even for high-profile officials, and serves as a reminder of the potential consequences of overlooking such requirements.

Source: Original article

AI and Meditation Help Indian-American Overcome Layoff Challenges

Abhishek’s journey through job loss, resilience, and self-discovery highlights the transformative power of AI and meditation in overcoming adversity.

After dedicating 11 years to building a career in technology, Abhishek found himself at the pinnacle of his dreams—a role in AI Product Marketing at Google. However, in an instant, everything changed. On a cold January morning, he received an unexpected layoff email, leaving him to grapple with the loss of not just a job, but a significant part of his identity.

For many, losing a job can feel like losing a piece of oneself, and for those on work visas, the stakes are even higher. Abhishek had just 60 days to secure a new position or face the prospect of leaving the country he had called home for over a decade. With grief not an option, he was thrust into survival mode.

In the following months, Abhishek launched into a frantic job search, interviewing at 25 companies in less than two months. By the end of this period, he had endured 65 interviews, each one a grueling test of his resilience. The pressure was immense; he had no choice but to keep his visa status intact.

Securing a position at a smaller AI company provided some relief, but it was not the fresh start he had hoped for. Instead, it felt more like a temporary solution. His confidence took a hit as he navigated through a series of toxic work environments. One particularly harrowing experience involved being fired by a CEO on Christmas Day, a moment that left him questioning his self-worth.

As he continued to apply for jobs, Abhishek faced a barrage of rejections. Feedback ranged from “you’re knowledgeable but not the right fit” to “we found another candidate.” Each rejection chipped away at his self-esteem, making the journey feel increasingly daunting.

Amidst the chaos, Abhishek set his sights on a crucial goal: obtaining his green card. Encouraged by a friend from Google, he pursued the EB-1A route, designed for individuals with exceptional abilities. Despite his self-doubt, he worked diligently with an attorney to compile his achievements, ultimately leading to the approval of his green card petition. This newfound legal stability provided a much-needed safety net during a tumultuous time.

Even with this progress, the job search continued, and Abhishek found himself unemployed for over four months. Rather than succumbing to despair, he made a pivotal decision: he would focus on personal growth and learning. He immersed himself in the world of AI, not just as a passive observer but as an active participant.

Abhishek took the initiative to lead hands-on workshops in prompt engineering and revisited coding through free online tutorials. He experimented with various AI tools, including Claude, Perplexity, and Cursor, and volunteered on projects that allowed him to apply his skills in real-world scenarios. This proactive approach not only expanded his knowledge but also rekindled his belief in his capabilities.

After two and a half years of relentless effort, the tide began to turn. Abhishek received four job offers, a testament to his hard work and resilience. With his green card finally in hand, he secured a position that aligned with his aspirations, emerging from the experience more confident and skilled than ever before.

Reflecting on his journey, Abhishek shares valuable insights that he wishes he had known during his darkest days. First and foremost, he emphasizes the importance of building an inner reservoir of happiness and resilience. For him, meditation has been a cornerstone of this practice. With 25 years of experience, he credits his meditation guide, Gurudev Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, for instilling in him the optimism needed to persevere through challenging times.

Abhishek also advocates for hands-on learning, particularly in the rapidly evolving field of AI. He encourages others to actively engage with the technology, pursue free online courses, and take on projects that push their boundaries. The skills and confidence gained through practical experience are invaluable in today’s job market.

Finally, he reassures those who may be struggling that they are not alone. The challenges of rejection, visa anxiety, and toxic work environments do not define one’s worth. With perseverance and a commitment to personal growth, the tide can indeed turn, and brighter days lie ahead.

As Abhishek’s story illustrates, resilience, continuous learning, and a supportive community can help individuals navigate the tumultuous landscape of career challenges and emerge stronger on the other side.

Source: Original article

Google Introduces Preferred Sources Feature for Top Stories Selection

Google has introduced a new “preferred sources” feature, allowing users to customize their Top Stories section with their favorite news outlets, including Fox News.

Google has launched a new feature that enables users to personalize their search results by selecting their preferred news outlets. This “preferred sources” feature was officially rolled out on August 12 and allows users to tailor the Top Stories section of Google search results to include articles from outlets they choose, such as Fox News.

According to Google, when users select their preferred sources, they will begin to see more articles from those outlets prominently displayed in the Top Stories section, provided that those sources have published fresh and relevant content related to the user’s search queries. This customization aims to enhance the user experience by ensuring that individuals receive news from sources they trust and prefer.

In addition to appearing in the Top Stories section, content from the selected preferred sources may also be featured in a dedicated “from your sources” section, further streamlining access to favored news articles. The process of adding Fox News or any other outlet as a preferred source is straightforward and can be completed in just a few clicks.

Users have the flexibility to select multiple sites as their preferred sources and can modify their selections at any time, allowing for a dynamic and personalized news consumption experience. This feature is particularly beneficial for those who want to stay updated on specific topics or events through the lens of their chosen news providers.

To add Fox News as a preferred source, users can follow the simple steps outlined by Google. This ensures that they remain informed about the latest coverage and developments from Fox News, tailored to their interests.

As digital news consumption continues to evolve, features like Google’s “preferred sources” are becoming increasingly important for users who seek to curate their news experience. By allowing individuals to choose their preferred outlets, Google is responding to the demand for more personalized and relevant content in an age of information overload.

With this new feature, Google aims to empower users to take control of their news feeds, ensuring they receive the information that matters most to them from the sources they trust.

Source: Original article

Brain-Eating Amoeba Infection Claims Life of Missouri Patient

A Missouri resident has died after contracting a rare brain-eating amoeba while water-skiing at the Lake of the Ozarks, prompting health officials to issue swimming precautions.

A Missouri resident has died following an infection with a rare brain-eating amoeba, Naegleria fowleri, while water-skiing at the Lake of the Ozarks. State health officials confirmed the death on Tuesday, stating that the individual, an adult from Missouri, succumbed to the infection at a hospital in the St. Louis area.

The Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) announced on August 13 that the patient had contracted Naegleria fowleri, a microscopic amoeba responsible for primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), a severe brain infection that is almost always fatal. The victim had been hospitalized in intensive care prior to their death.

Health officials believe the infection was acquired while the individual was engaged in water sports just days before being hospitalized. Naegleria fowleri is typically found in warm freshwater environments, such as lakes, rivers, and ponds, particularly when temperatures range from 80 to 115 degrees Fahrenheit, especially after storms.

The amoeba infects individuals when water enters the body through the nose, allowing it to travel to the brain and cause significant damage to brain tissue. Despite the severity of the infection, health officials emphasized that cases of Naegleria fowleri are extremely rare, with fewer than 10 cases reported annually in the United States. Since 1962, only 167 cases have been documented nationwide, with Missouri recording just two other cases in its history—one in 1987 and another in 2022.

In light of this incident, the DHSS has urged both residents and visitors to take precautions when swimming or participating in water activities in warm freshwater. Recommended safety measures include holding the nose shut or using nose clips, avoiding stirring up sediment in warm shallow waters, refraining from dunking the head in hot springs, and using distilled or boiled water for sinus rinses.

Symptoms of PAM can develop within one to 12 days of exposure and may include severe headache, fever, nausea, vomiting, stiff neck, seizures, confusion, and hallucinations. Health officials have noted that symptoms are likely to worsen over time. Early symptoms should prompt immediate medical evaluation, as they can also indicate bacterial meningitis, according to Tammy Lundstrom, chief medical officer and infectious disease specialist for Trinity Health in Michigan.

It is important to note that drinking contaminated water does not pose a risk for infection, and Naegleria fowleri does not spread from person to person. Treatment typically involves a combination of antifungal medications and antibiotics, such as rifampin and azithromycin.

Currently, no other cases are suspected in the area, as stated by the health agency in its press release. For further information, Fox News Digital has reached out to the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.

Source: Original article

Virginia Tech Study Reveals Dogs Can Detect Invasive Lanternflies

Researchers at Virginia Tech have demonstrated that dogs can effectively detect the invasive spotted lanternfly, aiding in efforts to control its spread.

Early detection of the spotted lanternfly is crucial, yet locating its eggs can be quite challenging. This is where dogs, with their exceptional sense of smell, come into play.

According to researchers at Virginia Tech, dogs may serve as a valuable ally in combating this invasive pest. For the first time, a study reveals that pet dogs can assist in halting the rapid proliferation of the spotted lanternfly.

The spotted lanternfly, which feeds on a variety of plants, excretes a sugary substance known as honeydew that fosters mold growth. Due to their destructive nature, some states have initiated campaigns urging residents to stomp on them whenever they are spotted. Experts emphasize that the most effective strategy is to eliminate their egg masses, which can be difficult to find as they often resemble dried mud and blend into their surroundings.

“Dogs have one dominant sense. It’s their nose. We use our eyes. Dogs use their nose like their eyes,” said Katie Thomas, a participant in the study.

Thomas and her nine-year-old pit bull mix, Finch, took part in the study with the hope of applying their years of recreational scent work to a pressing issue. They underwent both indoor and outdoor tests, successfully sniffing out egg masses, with Finch receiving recognition for his accurate detections.

“To be able to do things that we already do, that we are having a lot of fun with… train our dogs to sniff stuff, being able to apply that to something like a real problem that affects our community is really fulfilling,” Thomas remarked.

The spotted lanternfly is native to Asia and was first identified in the United States in Pennsylvania over a decade ago. Since then, it has spread to 19 states, according to the USDA.

“They are everywhere, and we need to search out the eggs. The problem is it’s too late once we have the lanternfly,” said Carolyn Shelburne, another study participant.

Shelburne and her nine-year-old border collie, Hermes, were among the first five K9 and handler teams to successfully pass their field tests. In total, 182 volunteer teams from across the U.S. participated in the study.

During indoor tests, dogs accurately identified the scent of the lanternfly more than 80% of the time. In real-world outdoor tests, they achieved a correct identification rate of over 60%. This performance surpasses that of most human searches.

“Hopefully, more people will see that you can train any dog to do this, and it gives you something fun to do with your dog,” Shelburne added.

Researchers are optimistic that this marks the beginning of a new role for dogs in protecting local environments. Even in regions where spotted lanternflies are not yet a concern, dogs could be trained to detect other invasive species.

Source: Original article

Debate Over D.C. Statehood Intensifies Amid Trump’s Local Police Authority

Democrats are renewing calls for Washington D.C. statehood as President Trump asserts control over the district’s police force, reigniting a long-standing debate about representation and governance.

The debate over Washington D.C. statehood has intensified as President Donald Trump continues to exert authority over the district’s police force. This situation has prompted House and Senate Democrats, along with D.C.’s non-voting delegates, to argue that if D.C. were a state, the president would not have the power to federalize its police force.

Last week, Trump invoked a provision of the Home Rule Act, which grants some autonomy to the nation’s capital, to effectively take control of the Metropolitan Police Department. This move was framed as a response to rising crime rates, leading to an increased presence of federal law enforcement agencies and the National Guard on the streets of D.C. The White House has highlighted rapid decreases in crime and numerous arrests since the federal takeover.

However, critics argue that the president’s actions represent an overreach of power and underscore the need for D.C. to achieve statehood. Currently, Washington D.C. lacks voting representation in Congress and is overseen by Congress despite having its own mayor and city council. Senator Paul Strauss, the district’s shadow senator, emphasized that if D.C. were a state, the president would not be able to impose such control outside of the federal enclave.

Strauss, who has long advocated for D.C. statehood, expressed concern that the current crackdown ignores the self-determination of D.C. residents. “It would be one thing if we actually had a crime emergency here, but we don’t,” he stated. “Violent crime in particular is down to 30-year lows. That’s not what’s happening here. He is using these national guardsmen and women as a stunt, and that’s wrong.”

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D.C.’s non-voting delegate in the House, echoed Strauss’s sentiments. “The president’s abuses are evidence of the urgent need for D.C. statehood so that more than 700,000 D.C. residents can finally have the full rights and privileges afforded to other Americans, including control of their own local resources and policies,” she said in a statement.

In response, White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers countered that violent crime in the district has “been spiraling out of control.” She accused Democrats of misleading the public regarding crime levels in the nation’s capital. “If they needed some anecdotal evidence, they could ask their own Democrat colleague about the time he was carjacked outside of his D.C. apartment by three armed criminals,” she remarked.

Lawmakers from neighboring Virginia and Maryland joined Strauss and Norton in arguing that Trump’s federalization of the local police highlights the urgent need for D.C. statehood. Senator Tim Kaine, D-Va., described the police takeover as a prime example of why D.C. deserves the same rights as states. Senator Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., criticized Republicans for playing political games with the district’s funding while supporting what he termed an authoritarian overreach by the president.

Van Hollen has announced plans to reintroduce a bill alongside Norton to grant statehood to D.C. He, Norton, and Representative Jamie Raskin, D-Md., have also introduced a joint resolution in the House aimed at halting Trump’s takeover of the D.C. police.

Raskin pointed out that residents of Washington D.C. are uniquely disenfranchised, being the only citizens in a capital city worldwide without representation in their national legislature. “The people of Washington have petitioned for statehood and should be admitted as a state rather than treated as a MAGA-colonized populace,” he stated.

Despite the renewed push for statehood, the likelihood of achieving this goal remains slim while Republicans control both chambers of Congress and the presidency. Strauss noted, “I think there’s probably not a pathway to get this done while Republicans control all three branches of the government. They have shown that they’re more interested in the partisan impact of controlling the legislative branch and not really interested in the principle of self-determination for Washington, D.C. residents.”

The ongoing debate over D.C. statehood continues to reflect broader issues of representation and governance in the United States, with many advocates arguing that the residents of the nation’s capital deserve the same rights as those in the states.

Source: Original article

Massive Search Operation Underway After Drone Sighting Near Jammu Border

Security forces have initiated a large-scale search operation in Jammu’s Gajansoo-Marh area following the sighting of a suspected hostile drone, raising fears of potential weapon or narcotics drops.

Jammu: A significant search operation was launched by security forces in the Gajansoo-Marh region along the Indo-Pakistan International Border after a suspected hostile drone was detected deep within Indian territory on Wednesday evening.

According to officials, the drone’s movement prompted an immediate alert in the border area. The Jammu and Kashmir Police, in collaboration with personnel from the Border Security Force (BSF), quickly cordoned off the fields and surrounding residential neighborhoods to locate the unidentified flying object.

The atmosphere in the area remained tense as search teams meticulously combed through agricultural lands and clusters of villages, driven by concerns over a potential drop of weapons or narcotics. An official confirmed, “Soon after receiving inputs of drone activity, teams of BSF and police rushed to the spot. A large-scale search operation is still underway.”

This incident has reignited worries about increased drone activity across the border. In previous instances, security forces have successfully thwarted multiple attempts to drop contraband in the Jammu sector, recovering consignments that included weapons, explosives, and narcotics believed to have originated from across the border.

In response to this latest incident, officials have stated that security measures have been intensified along the sensitive border region to ensure that any infiltration or smuggling attempts are swiftly neutralized.

Source: Original article

Ilhan Omar Criticizes Party for Withdrawing Support from Socialist Candidate

Rep. Ilhan Omar criticized the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party for revoking its endorsement of mayoral candidate Omar Fateh, calling the decision “inexcusable” and highlighting divisions within the party.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, a prominent member of the progressive House “Squad,” expressed her outrage on Thursday night over the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party’s (DFL) decision to revoke its endorsement of Omar Fateh, a candidate for mayor of Minneapolis.

The DFL cited “substantial failures” in its endorsement convention process as the reason for the reversal. In response, Omar took to social media platform X, stating, “It is inexcusable to overturn the DFL endorsement from Omar Fateh.” She criticized the decision, emphasizing that it was made by a small group of individuals, many of whom do not reside in Minneapolis, who privately convened to override the will of local delegates who had participated in a lengthy endorsement process.

Omar’s condemnation of the DFL’s actions was not an isolated sentiment. She led a coalition of other DFL officials in a letter expressing their strong disapproval of the party’s decision. “Right now, there is a clear tension between the progressive Democrats who are challenging the status quo and moderate Democrats,” the letter stated. The group lamented that Fateh, who is the first Black mayoral candidate to receive DFL endorsement in nearly three decades, would have his endorsement rescinded.

Despite the turmoil, Omar has yet to publicly endorse any candidate in the upcoming mayoral race, which is scheduled for November 2025. Fateh, who identifies as a “democratic socialist,” secured the DFL endorsement after a competitive endorsing convention in July 2025, defeating several other Democratic hopefuls, including the current Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who is seeking a third term.

Fateh’s political stance has drawn comparisons to other democratic socialists, such as Zohran Mamdani, a candidate in New York City. However, DFL Party Chairman Richard Carlbom did not reference Fateh’s political ideology in his statement regarding the revocation of the endorsement.

Omar and other progressive leaders have framed the DFL’s decision as indicative of the ongoing rift within the Democratic Party. “Chair Richard Carlbom campaigned on uniting the DFL; this decision directly runs counter to that effort, to which we are all committed,” Omar remarked. She further asserted that the DFL should be a big-tent party that fairly represents all factions rather than silencing dissenting voices.

Omar concluded her remarks by expressing concern that the party’s decision would discourage and alienate many voters from engaging with the DFL. The Minnesota DFL was contacted for comment, but no response was received by press time.

Source: Original article

Kwatra Engages with US Lawmakers Amid Strained Indian-American Relations

India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Mohan Kwatra, is engaging with American lawmakers to address trade and energy security concerns amid rising tensions between the two nations.

WASHINGTON, D.C.—India’s Ambassador to the United States, Vinay Mohan Kwatra, has initiated a series of high-level discussions with American lawmakers to tackle escalating trade and energy security issues. This diplomatic outreach comes at a pivotal moment, following the U.S. government’s recent decision to impose significant tariffs on Indian goods due to New Delhi’s ongoing purchases of Russian oil.

Over the course of two days, Kwatra engaged in conversations with five U.S. Representatives and one Senator, where he provided insights into India’s stance on these recent developments.

On August 20, Kwatra held a “productive discussion” with Representative Pete Sessions, who chairs the Congressional Subcommittee on Governmental Operations. During this meeting, he elaborated on India’s trade position and exchanged views on energy security, highlighting the growing hydrocarbon partnership between the two nations.

In a post on the social media platform X, Kwatra described his conversation with Representative Marc Veasey as “fruitful,” emphasizing the necessity of “fair, balanced, and mutually beneficial trade” to fortify bilateral relations. He also briefed Representative Michael Baumgartner on recent advancements in the U.S.-India partnership, focusing on mutual trade and energy ties.

The following day, August 21, Kwatra continued his diplomatic efforts with a meeting with Senator John Cornyn, Co-Chair of the Senate India Caucus from Texas. Their discussion centered on enhancing bilateral trade and cooperation in hydrocarbons, particularly between Texas and India.

Additionally, Kwatra met with Congressman Andy Barr, Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Monetary Policy, to explore ways to strengthen the U.S.-India bilateral trade and investment partnership.

This series of meetings coincides with a marked increase in trade tensions between the two countries. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated on August 20 that President Trump’s stringent tariff measures against India were aimed at exerting “secondary pressure” on Russia in light of the ongoing Ukraine conflict.

Leavitt explained during a briefing, “The president has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He’s taken actions, as you’ve seen, sanctions on India and other actions as well. He’s made himself very clear that he wants to see this war end.”

In response to the U.S. tariffs, India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) previously criticized the measures as “unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable,” asserting that India’s energy needs and strategic autonomy must be respected.

As these discussions unfold, the outcome remains to be seen, but the importance of maintaining a constructive dialogue between the U.S. and India is clear, especially in the context of global energy security and trade relations.

Source: Original article

Search Operation Underway in Kathua Following Armed Suspects Sighting

Security forces initiated a search operation in Kathua’s Juthana area following reports of two armed suspects spotted by locals.

KATHUA: A significant search operation was launched late Thursday night in the Juthana area of Rajbagh, Kathua district, after local residents reported sightings of two armed individuals.

According to official sources, the alert was raised around 9:45 p.m. when police received information from a local eyewitness in the Jakhol area. The witness reported seeing two unidentified men dressed in black and carrying weapons in the vicinity around 9:30 p.m. Notably, the suspects were not seen carrying any backpacks.

In response to the report, the Jammu and Kashmir Police, with assistance from security forces, quickly mobilized to the area, initiating a cordon-and-search operation aimed at locating the suspects. The locality was sealed off, and door-to-door searches were conducted to ensure thorough scrutiny of the area.

Officials confirmed that the search efforts continued late into the night, with additional reinforcements deployed to sensitive areas to prevent any potential incidents. This heightened alert comes in light of previous instances of militant movements reported in various parts of the Kathua district.

Further details regarding the operation and the suspects remain pending as authorities continue their investigation.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Tariff Threat Serves as Wake-Up Call for Indian Economy

India’s relationship with Donald Trump has evolved from admiration to a wake-up call, prompting a critical reassessment of its diplomatic and economic strategies in the face of shifting global dynamics.

India once had a love affair with Donald Trump. Long before the rest of the world figured him out, Indians were cheering his every move. At one point, he was more popular in India than in much of the United States. His bluster, bravado, and disregard for political correctness resonated deeply in a country burdened by colonial bureaucracy, outdated laws, and a culture steeped in red tape. Trump’s instinct to bulldoze through institutions was not only seen as refreshing but also necessary.

He was not perceived merely as another politician; he was embraced as a wrecking ball aimed at a system that had long ceased to serve its purpose. India, eager for its own disruptors, welcomed him as a kindred spirit. The stadium rallies, choreographed slogans, and orchestrated pageantry may have appeared theatrical, but they reflected a genuine belief that boldness could substitute for reform, and disruption could shortcut progress.

However, this admiration soon turned into disillusionment. A series of tariffs, visa caps, immigration crackdowns, and punitive trade threats emerged, leaving India, which had positioned itself as a respectful partner adhering to global norms, on the defensive. The abrupt shift was jarring, but in hindsight, it may have served as a crucial catalyst for re-evaluating long-held assumptions that had gone unchallenged for too long.

Trump was never swayed by principles or diplomacy; he responded to flattery, spectacle, and theatrics. The Pakistanis understood this dynamic early on and skillfully engaged him, offering symbolic wins like a Nobel Peace Prize nomination and effusive praise for his social media antics. These gestures garnered them attention without incurring significant costs. In contrast, India clung to formality, protocol, and outdated instincts, believing that rational behavior would prevail.

What might have worked better was a Bollywood-style spectacle. Imagine a Pulitzer for his tweets, a Nobel for attempting peace in South Asia (or at least for trying in all caps), an Oscar for best improvisation in geopolitical drama, and perhaps even an IIFA for lifetime achievement in melodrama—presented by Amitabh Bachchan with dramatic flair and thunderous applause. While absurd, such an approach might have resonated more effectively with Trump, whose absurd often outperformed the rational.

This moment calls for a re-examination of assumptions across various domains. There is a pressing need to reform existing systems and policies. In business, for instance, entrepreneurs still navigate overlapping regulations and outdated procedures. Scientists are often hindered not by the complexity of their research but by the bureaucratic hurdles required to secure funding, approval, or application. Starting a business frequently demands not just innovation but also the ability to maneuver through licenses, inspections, and gatekeepers. Scaling a business requires even more: deep networks, institutional patience, and a working knowledge of which rules to quietly bypass. While the outside world recognizes the scale and talent India offers, many of its own citizens remain trapped in systems designed to manage scarcity rather than unlock abundance.

It is not a shortage of talent that hinders progress; it is a surplus of red tape.

This moment presents an opportunity to clear the air by eliminating redundant licenses, enforcing real-time single-window clearances, and implementing presumptive approvals so that silence from a regulator becomes a green light rather than a dead end. Tariffs that increase the cost of advanced manufacturing and research tools should be abolished, and clarity must be introduced to export-import procedures still mired in a control-era mindset.

State governments should be empowered to compete not only on slogans but also on actual performance metrics—startup outcomes, business registration timelines, research and development output, and regulatory speed. Private universities and research institutions need to be liberated from micromanagement to scale without seeking permission. Partnerships between industry and academia should be expedited. Modernization and transparency in patents, technology transfer, and procurement processes are essential.

India does not need to look outward for validation. It possesses the data, scale, engineering expertise, and ambition to lead from within. Health, agriculture, climate, manufacturing, and mobility—these datasets alone represent a strategic resource waiting to be unlocked. Coupled with an unmatched pool of ambitious entrepreneurs, builders, and scientists, India can emerge not just as a participant in the global innovation race but as a driver of it. Companies like Vionix Biosciences recognize this potential in India—not merely its scale but also its scientific and operational depth capable of delivering breakthroughs that the West struggles to achieve due to a lack of talent.

Trump may have inadvertently done India a favor. He exposed the fragility of its diplomatic assumptions and reminded the nation that performance must be matched by persuasion, and execution must be complemented by storytelling. India has been handed lemons—by Trump, by its own bureaucracy, and by the inconsistencies of the global market. The time has come not to complain, delay, or tread cautiously, but to transform these challenges into opportunities: to turn those lemons into lemonade, scale the process, bottle it with confidence, and serve it to the world as proof of what is possible when ambition meets execution.

Source: Original article

Cheetah’s 130-Kilometer Journey Challenges India’s Wildlife Corridor System

In a significant test of India’s inter-state cheetah corridor, a female cheetah named Jwala traveled nearly 130 km from Madhya Pradesh into Rajasthan before being safely rescued.

SHEOPUR – A remarkable event has unfolded in India’s wildlife conservation efforts as a free-ranging female cheetah named Jwala made a daring journey from Madhya Pradesh’s Kuno National Park to Rajasthan’s Sawai Madhopur district, covering nearly 130 kilometers. This incident marks the first confirmed inter-state movement of a cheetah since the establishment of the new corridor, raising both ecological optimism and logistical concerns.

Jwala, equipped with a radio collar for tracking purposes, was first spotted on August 11 in the Manpur area of Sheopur district, accompanied by her cub. However, by the following day, she had separated from her cub and crossed the Chambal riverbanks, ultimately reaching Baler village in Rajasthan, according to officials.

On the morning of August 13, local villagers discovered Jwala inside a goat enclosure and promptly alerted the team at Ranthambore Tiger Reserve. Initial attempts to rescue her were complicated by her aggressive behavior, prompting the RTR officials to request assistance from the Kuno team.

The Kuno rescue team arrived by mid-morning and successfully tranquilized Jwala within 15 minutes. To prevent any potential human-wildlife conflict, they removed the goat kill before transporting her back to Kuno National Park. Upon her return, Jwala rejoined a population of 26 cheetahs, which includes nine adults and 17 Indian-born cubs, as reported by the Madhya Pradesh government on August 13.

Forest and police officials from both Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan collaborated closely to ensure the safety of both the cheetah and local residents during the operation. The management team at Kuno expressed gratitude for the support received throughout the rescue efforts.

This incident occurs just months after Rajasthan was formally integrated into India’s first inter-state cheetah conservation corridor, which spans an impressive 17,000 square kilometers across protected landscapes in both Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan. The corridor is designed to facilitate the natural movement of cheetahs and restore grassland ecosystems.

While the successful rescue of Jwala highlights the ecological potential of the corridor, it also brings to light the challenges associated with managing free-ranging predators in areas dominated by human activity. Wildlife experts have noted that such movements are indicative of healthy adaptation among the species. However, they emphasize the need for enhanced monitoring and increased community awareness to mitigate potential conflicts.

As India continues to develop its wildlife corridors, the incident involving Jwala serves as both a success story and a reminder of the complexities involved in wildlife conservation efforts.

Source: Original article

India Expresses Optimism About Improving Relations With China

India’s National Security Advisor, Ajit Doval, expressed optimism about an “upward trend” in relations with China, highlighting peaceful borders and substantial bilateral engagements since last year’s summit.

NEW DELHI – National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval stated on August 19 that relations between India and China have experienced an “upward trend.” He noted that the borders have remained peaceful since the meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Kazan last year.

Doval’s comments come as the Chinese Foreign Minister embarks on a two-day visit to India to discuss a variety of critical issues, including the border situation, trade relations, and the resumption of flight services.

“There has been an upward trend. Borders have been quiet. There has been peace and tranquility. Our bilateral engagements have been more substantial. And we are most grateful to our leaders who, in Kazan last October, were able to set a new trend, and we have profited a lot since then,” Doval remarked.

He emphasized the importance of the “new energy and the new momentum” in the relationship, attributing this progress to the personal efforts of leaders and the maturity and sense of responsibility exhibited by diplomatic teams, ambassadors, and military personnel stationed at the borders.

The recent meetings aimed at rapprochement have gained urgency as global dynamics shift, particularly in light of the unpredictable presidency of Donald Trump in the United States.

As India and China navigate their complex relationship, Doval’s remarks reflect a cautious optimism about the future of bilateral ties, underscoring the significance of continued dialogue and cooperation.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Community Celebrates Cultural Heritage Through Art and Tradition

Birdwatching enthusiasts can find a variety of avian species across California, from the striking Stellar Jay to the graceful Hawaiian Stilt.

The beauty of California’s avifauna captivates birdwatchers and nature enthusiasts alike. Among the diverse species that inhabit the state, several stand out for their unique characteristics and behaviors.

At the Baylands Nature Preserve, the Hawaiian Stilt can often be seen poised on one leg, skillfully scouting for small fish and insects. This elegant bird, with its long legs and slender body, is a testament to the adaptability of wildlife in urban environments.

Meanwhile, in Yosemite National Park, the Stellar Jay captures attention with its distinctive tuft and vibrant blue feathers. This striking bird often perches on logs, providing a picturesque sight for visitors exploring the park’s natural beauty.

In San Jose’s Almaden Valley, the Red-shouldered Hawk can be spotted perched on a maple tree, vigilantly watching over its nest. Known for its distinctive call and striking plumage, this raptor plays a crucial role in the local ecosystem.

Also in the Baylands, the Canada Goose enjoys leisurely afternoons, sunning itself by the water. These geese are a common sight in many parks and nature preserves, often gathering in groups and adding to the serene landscape.

From a high vantage point atop a Valley Oak in Almaden Valley, the White-tailed Kite surveys the cityscape. This bird of prey is known for its graceful flight and keen eyesight, making it an impressive sight against the backdrop of urban development.

Lastly, the Mallard Duck can be found in reflective moments at Almaden Lake Park. With its vibrant colors and calm demeanor, the Mallard is a familiar and beloved species among park visitors.

California’s rich birdlife offers endless opportunities for observation and appreciation, making it a prime destination for birdwatchers and nature lovers alike.

Source: Original article

China Offers Minerals to India Amidst Tensions from Galwan Clash

China’s recent commitment to address India’s rare-earth material needs signals a significant shift in bilateral relations following the tensions from the Galwan crisis in 2019.

China’s recent decision to consider India’s increasing demand for rare-earth materials represents a pivotal moment in the two nations’ relationship, which has been strained since the Galwan Valley clash in 2019.

The Galwan crisis, which resulted in casualties on both sides, marked a low point in Sino-Indian relations. Since then, both countries have navigated a complex landscape of geopolitical tensions, border disputes, and economic competition.

India’s reliance on imports for rare-earth elements, essential for various high-tech industries, has become a pressing concern. These materials are crucial for the production of electronics, renewable energy technologies, and defense systems. As global demand for these resources continues to rise, India’s need for a stable supply chain has become increasingly urgent.

China, which dominates the global supply of rare-earth elements, has the potential to play a significant role in meeting India’s needs. By addressing this demand, China may be seeking to mend fences and foster a more cooperative relationship with India.

Analysts suggest that this move could be interpreted as a strategic realignment, where both nations recognize the importance of collaboration over conflict. The promise to supply rare-earth materials could serve as a foundation for broader economic ties and diplomatic engagement.

However, skepticism remains regarding the sincerity of China’s intentions. Critics argue that while this offer may appear beneficial, it could also be a tactic to gain leverage over India in a time of heightened geopolitical competition.

As India continues to develop its own rare-earth processing capabilities, the relationship with China will be closely monitored. The balance between dependence on Chinese resources and the pursuit of self-sufficiency will be a critical factor in shaping future interactions.

In conclusion, China’s commitment to addressing India’s rare-earth needs could signify a thaw in relations, but the complexities of their historical tensions and current geopolitical dynamics will play a crucial role in determining the outcome.

Source: Original article

Celebrating Armed Forces on National TV: Pride Over Controversy

The recent appearance of Indian Armed Forces officers on a popular quiz show has sparked discussions about the significance of honoring military service on national television.

New Delhi: The recent spotlight on Indian Armed Forces officers, including Colonel Sofiya Qureshi, Wing Commander Vyomika Singh, and Commander Prerna Deosthalee, during the Independence Day special of *Kaun Banega Crorepati* (KBC) has ignited conversations among viewers. While some critics questioned the appropriateness of their appearance in uniform on such a popular platform, this reaction misses a crucial point: honoring those who defend the nation and sharing their heroic stories is a practice that every country should embrace.

In previous years, decorated soldiers, including recipients of the Param Vir Chakra, have appeared on KBC and other platforms, proudly recounting their experiences. These narratives of courage and sacrifice serve as beacons of inspiration, particularly for young Indians who view the armed forces as a path of honor and dedication.

Operation Sindoor, a landmark mission in India’s fight against terrorism, is one such story that deserves to be told. Bringing accounts from this pivotal military operation into the living rooms of millions is essential. It not only educates the public but also highlights the skill and bravery behind the headlines, fostering appreciation and understanding between civilians and the military.

Additionally, the role of women in the armed forces cannot be overlooked. The Indian defense services prioritize merit and commitment over gender, and these officers exemplify that ethos. Their visibility on a nationwide platform sends a powerful message to young girls, demonstrating that serving the nation and excelling in defense careers is an attainable goal.

Wearing the uniform on a stage as prominent as KBC is a proud declaration of dedication, valor, and unity, rather than a political statement. Instead of casting doubt or criticism, the nation should rally behind these brave individuals, celebrating their achievements and sacrifices. Their stories contribute to the resilience and strength of India.

Moreover, showcasing our armed forces heroes during significant moments like Independence Day serves as a reminder of the bravery that safeguards our freedom. It inspires all citizens, bridges the gap between military and civilian life, and motivates future generations—especially women—to aspire to serve with pride and honor.

In conclusion, the celebration of the armed forces on national television should be viewed as a matter of pride, not controversy. It is an opportunity to honor those who protect our nation and to inspire future generations to follow in their footsteps.

Source: Original article

Indian-Americans Embrace Dual Identity While Celebrating Cultural Heritage

India’s Independence Day on August 15 serves as a poignant reminder of cultural heritage and identity for the Indian diaspora, reflecting on the enduring connection between Indian-Americans and their roots.

India celebrates its Independence Day on August 15, marking the historic moment in 1947 when the nation broke free from nearly two centuries of British colonial rule. This day is not merely a celebration of political freedom; it serves as a sacred reminder of India’s civilizational legacy, cultural heritage, and the indomitable spirit of its people. It honors the countless martyrs and freedom fighters whose valor and sacrifice ignited the flame of resistance. Even thousands of miles away, the hearts of the Indian diaspora resonate with pride and reflection on this significant day, reaffirming their identity and connection to their roots.

For many, including myself, August 15 evokes deep emotions. After living in the U.S. for 57 years, I am an American citizen, yet my soul remains tethered to the land of my birth. The Indian national anthem still sends chills down my spine, and each year, I pause—not merely to celebrate, but to reflect on who I am and where I come from.

When I first arrived in the U.S. as a hopeful student, I carried more than just textbooks and clothes; I brought with me an emotional legacy that defined my Indian identity. This included a rich understanding of our traditions, a deep pride in India’s civilizational wisdom, and a profound respect for the heroes who fought for our independence. Although I left India physically, the essence of India never truly left me.

Independence Day in India was always a deeply emotional occasion during my childhood. Schools organized flag-hoisting ceremonies, and patriotic songs filled the air. Timeless compositions like “Ae mere watan ke logon” resonated with youthful idealism, and we were taught to honor our freedom fighters not just as figures in history but as the architects of the freedom we now cherish. Remembering them was not just a ritual; it came with a sense of pride and responsibility.

Over the years, my relationship with India’s Independence Day has transformed. In the early years after moving to the U.S., I felt a profound longing for India on August 15. Now, with most of my siblings also residing in the U.S., those memories have matured into a shared diasporic identity. We are all Indian-Americans—hyphenated, but still whole.

Despite the physical distance, my bond with Indian culture remains vibrant. I still savor Indian food, particularly the simple, home-cooked variety. My wife and I are currently captivated by the web series *Veer Hanuman*, which we watch each evening with a sense of awe and devotion. I continue to appreciate Hindi cinema, especially classics that promote values of patriotism, justice, and moral clarity. My admiration for Indian philosophy, particularly Advaita Vedanta, has deepened over time. My mornings often begin with YouTube lectures by Swami Sarvapriyananda, Head of the Vedanta Society of New York, whose interpretations of Upanishadic wisdom help me navigate the complexities of modern life with spiritual grounding.

Socially, our Indian identity flourishes. We regularly gather with Indian neighbors and college classmates, many of whom also live in the U.S., reminiscing about our past and engaging in lively discussions on economics, politics, philosophy, religion, and culture. Our shared history serves as a glue that binds us, even as we thrive in a different land.

My wife, perhaps more than I, keeps our connection to India alive by visiting every two years to see her brother and sister. I join her occasionally, but most of my family now resides in the U.S. Whenever I do visit India, I am struck by how much it has changed, yet how much remains the same. The colors, the chaos, the contradictions—they still feel like home.

While older generations seem consistent with the values I recall, I have noticed that many young Indians have undergone a cultural shift since I moved to the U.S. Although their core values have not changed dramatically, they appear more “Americanized” than we ever were—conversing primarily in English, enjoying alcohol socially, preferring fast food, and embracing American pop culture. I recall a humorous anecdote about an NRI who, while visiting India, took his Indian friends and family to a restaurant offering both Indian and Western cuisine. When it came time to order, he was the only one who chose Indian food—everyone else opted for Western dishes. This amusing story reflects a genuine trend, as American fast food, along with Chinese, Italian, and Mexican cuisines, has become increasingly popular in India. Ironically, during my visits, I often feel more “Indian” than many Indians living in India.

Do I romanticize India? Perhaps. But nostalgia is not always about factual precision; it is about emotional truth. I am deeply proud of India—not only for her ancient wisdom but also for her democratic resilience. While the country faces challenges such as bureaucratic red tape, population pressure, infrastructure issues, and environmental degradation, it also showcases innovation, vitality, and an unwavering belief in progress.

August 15 is not just a day for remembering the past; it is a moment to reflect on the present. It prompts me to ask: Has India fulfilled the dreams of her freedom fighters? Are we still striving for justice, equity, and unity? On a personal level, I wonder: Am I doing my part to preserve and share the values that India instilled in me?

In many ways, I believe I am. When I share Hindu philosophical ideas with my American friends, I feel I am serving as a cultural and spiritual bridge. When I recount stories to my children and grandchildren about the India of my youth, the moral clarity of its freedom movement, and the nobility of its ideals, I am planting seeds—not necessarily of identity, but certainly of appreciation.

Ultimately, I have come to understand that August 15 is not just India’s Independence Day; it is also a day of interdependence. Although I may no longer live in India, my identity, values, and spiritual compass have been shaped by her. I owe so much of who I am to her timeless legacy.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Endorsement of Pakistan Reportedly Strained US-India Relations

US President Donald Trump’s endorsement of Pakistan has significantly undermined the two-decade-long partnership between the United States and India, according to a recent report.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A report published on August 14 highlights that US President Donald Trump’s approach to India, combined with his repeated endorsements of Pakistan, has severely damaged the relationship between the two nations. This partnership, once considered a defining aspect of the 21st century, has suffered as a result of Trump’s actions.

The report, released by the International Centre for Peace Studies (ICPS), indicates that Trump’s policies have gone beyond economic tariffs, as he has “repeatedly and deliberately” challenged India’s core national security concerns, particularly regarding Kashmir. This has struck at the heart of India’s most sensitive issues.

Previous US administrations, including those of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama, invested considerable effort into building strategic trust with India. They respected India’s red lines concerning Kashmir and refrained from actions that could embolden Pakistan. In stark contrast, Trump’s administration has publicly praised Pakistan, empowered its military leadership, and undermined India’s regional standing. This shift has weakened India’s fight against cross-border terrorism on the global stage, according to the report.

Recently, the United States has also provided a platform for Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff, General Asim Munir, to issue nuclear threats against India. This marks a significant and unprecedented downturn in the relationship between Washington and New Delhi.

“By repeatedly endorsing Pakistan and ignoring India’s core concerns, Trump has eroded two decades of mutual trust,” a senior Indian diplomat stated in the report. The diplomat likened the current situation to a return to Cold War-era suspicion and strategic distance.

The report emphasizes the seriousness of the aggressive remarks made on American soil, particularly the nuclear threat in which Munir stated that Pakistan is a nuclear nation ready to “take half the world down with us.” Such alarming statements not only highlight Pakistan’s hostile intent but also reflect the strategic confidence it has gained from recent US support.

In the midst of this diplomatic turmoil, the report notes a noticeable shift in Beijing’s tone towards India, which should serve as a clear warning to Washington. The Chinese Foreign Ministry has criticized US tariffs on Indian goods, warning that “if you give a bully an inch, he will take a mile.” This sentiment has been echoed across state-controlled media, portraying Trump’s trade approach as unreasonable and strategically misguided.

Following the imposition of significant tariffs on India by the US, Chinese state media has praised India, demonstrating “respect and urgency” in hosting Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his upcoming visit. The Global Times, a Chinese state-run newspaper, has highlighted that “as regional powers, China and India have extensive shared interests in areas such as counterterrorism, trade, and cultural exchange.” It further stressed that “a healthy China–India relationship brings positive spillover effects to the region and the world.”

The ICPS report concludes that the US must recognize that weakening India does not enhance its position; rather, it empowers its rivals. Every key US strategic document underscores India’s importance in counterbalancing China in the Indo-Pacific region.

According to the report, the current trajectory of US-India relations poses a significant challenge to the long-standing partnership that has been carefully cultivated over the past two decades.

Source: Original article

Jairam Criticizes PM Modi’s Remarks on RSS as Desperate Attempt

Congress criticized Prime Minister Modi’s Independence Day speech, calling it “stale and troubling,” particularly for its mention of the RSS, which they deemed a breach of secular values.

New Delhi: The Congress party has sharply criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day speech, labeling it as “stale and troubling.” The party expressed particular concern over Modi’s reference to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which they argue undermines the principles of a constitutional, secular republic. Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh described the mention of the RSS as a “desperate attempt to appease his organization” ahead of Modi’s 75th birthday next month.

In a post on X, Ramesh stated, “The Prime Minister’s speech from the ramparts of the Red Fort today was stale, hypocritical, insipid, and troubling.” He criticized the Prime Minister for recycling slogans such as Viksit Bharat, Atmanirbhar Bharat, and “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas,” claiming that these phrases have been repeated year after year with little tangible progress to show for them.

Ramesh specifically called out the repeated promises regarding the “Made-in-India” semiconductor chip initiative, stating that it has been touted numerous times without any actual delivery. He noted that the first Semiconductor Complex in India was established in Chandigarh in the early 1980s, suggesting that Modi’s claims are misleading.

The Congress leader also addressed issues concerning farmers, asserting that the government’s rhetoric on protecting their interests has become hollow. He pointed to Modi’s previous attempts to push through three controversial farm laws and the lack of a legal guarantee for Minimum Support Prices (MSP). Ramesh emphasized the absence of a credible roadmap for job creation, stating that the government’s promises in this area have become mere lip service.

Ramesh further criticized Modi’s claims of promoting unity, inclusion, and democracy, arguing that the Prime Minister has overseen the erosion of key constitutional institutions, including the Election Commission. He highlighted the recent Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls in Bihar, which has reportedly disenfranchised over 6.5 million voters, as a significant concern.

He remarked that Modi’s assertions of empowering states ring hollow when the central government continues to undermine federalism and marginalize state governments, particularly those led by opposition parties.

Ramesh expressed that Independence Day should serve as a moment for vision, candor, and inspiration, rather than a platform for self-congratulation and selective storytelling. He criticized Modi’s speech for failing to address the deep economic distress, rising unemployment, and increasing economic inequality in society.

Regarding the Prime Minister’s mention of the RSS, Ramesh stated, “The most troubling element of the Prime Minister’s speech today was his name-checking of the RSS from the ramparts of the Red Fort — a blatant breach of the spirit of a constitutional, secular republic.” He added that this politicization of Independence Day for personal and organizational gain is detrimental to the democratic ethos of the nation.

Ramesh concluded by suggesting that Modi appears fatigued and is now reliant on the RSS for support, particularly in light of the political landscape shifting after the events of June 4, 2024. He remarked, “This politicization of Independence Day for personal and organizational gain is deeply corrosive to our democratic ethos,” and quipped that the Prime Minister is “tired today and soon he will be retired.”

These remarks followed Modi’s 97-minute address, during which he highlighted the RSS as one of the world’s largest non-governmental organizations, celebrating its centenary and its contributions to nation-building and character development.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Community Celebrates Cultural Heritage at Annual Festival

USCIS provides a comprehensive resource for news, updates, and statistics related to immigration and citizenship on its dedicated Newsroom webpage.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has established a centralized Newsroom webpage that serves as a vital resource for the public. This platform offers a variety of news releases and alerts, which are searchable by topic and date, ensuring that users can easily find the information they need.

In addition to news releases, the USCIS Newsroom includes updates on policies and procedures, as well as important announcements regarding office closures and other emergencies. This feature is particularly useful for individuals seeking timely information about USCIS operations.

For those interested in visual content, the Newsroom also hosts a Video and Image Gallery. This section provides access to images and videos that showcase USCIS operations, offering a behind-the-scenes look at the agency’s work.

Data enthusiasts will appreciate the Immigration and Citizenship Data page, which presents various categories of immigration data and statistics. This resource is essential for researchers, policymakers, and anyone looking to understand immigration trends in the United States.

USCIS maintains an active presence on social media, with several accounts dedicated to providing the latest updates and information. Following these accounts can help individuals stay informed about changes and announcements from the agency.

The Newsroom also features a section for recent speeches, statements, and congressional testimony from USCIS leadership. These documents are searchable by topic and date, allowing users to access important discussions and insights from agency officials.

For those seeking more in-depth information, the Electronic Reading Room offers access to documents identified under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Users can search for topics of interest using a convenient drop-down list, making it easier to find specific information.

USCIS understands the importance of communication with the media and has established a network of agency representatives across the country to respond to media inquiries. This ensures that journalists and the public can obtain accurate and timely information about immigration and citizenship matters.

Additionally, the Newsroom provides information about upcoming events, including local and national engagements. This feature allows the community to stay informed about opportunities to engage with USCIS and participate in discussions related to immigration issues.

Overall, the USCIS Newsroom is a comprehensive resource designed to keep the public informed about immigration and citizenship matters. By providing access to news, data, and multimedia content, USCIS aims to enhance transparency and communication with the community.

Source: Original article

SC Interim Order Viewed as Courageous by Congress Leader Jairam

The Congress party has praised the Supreme Court’s recent order regarding the revision of voter rolls in Bihar, calling it a significant step towards transparency and accountability.

New Delhi: The Congress party expressed its approval on Thursday regarding the Supreme Court’s order concerning the special intensive revision of voter rolls in Bihar. The court directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to publish the names and reasons for the omission of approximately 65 lakh voters, a move that Congress described as both courageous and a beacon of hope.

Jairam Ramesh, Congress General Secretary and media in-charge, took to X (formerly Twitter) to commend the Supreme Court’s decision. He stated, “The Supreme Court has just upheld the Constitution of India in a categorical, convincing, and courageous manner.”

Ramesh also criticized the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), suggesting that the party’s leadership has been detrimental to the Republic. He remarked, “It is a long struggle to rescue our Republic from the machinations of the Prime Minister and his drumbeaters.” He emphasized that the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Bihar Special Intensive Revision (SIR) issue represents a significant first step towards restoring democratic integrity.

The Supreme Court’s directive mandates that the Election Commission make public the list of voters whose names appeared in the 2025 voter list but were omitted from the draft list. This information is to be made available on the websites of district electoral officers across Bihar, organized booth-wise, and can be accessed using the voter’s Electoral Photo Identity Card (EPIC) number.

Furthermore, the court instructed the Election Commission to provide reasons for each voter’s non-inclusion in the draft roll. It also called for extensive publicity regarding the display of this list, which should be disseminated through widely circulated newspapers in Bihar. Additionally, the information will be broadcast on Doordarshan and various radio channels.

The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of transparency, stating that if district electoral officers maintain social media accounts, they should also post public notices on those platforms. These notices will inform aggrieved voters that they can submit claims along with a copy of their Aadhaar card.

Moreover, the court ordered that booth-wise lists of the 65 lakh omitted voters be displayed on notice boards at each booth-level office in panchayat offices. This initiative aims to ensure that the public has easy access to the lists and the reasons for omissions, further promoting accountability in the electoral process.

Overall, the Supreme Court’s ruling has been hailed by the Congress party as a crucial step towards ensuring electoral transparency and protecting the rights of voters in Bihar.

Source: Original article

State Department Supports Trump’s Engagement with Pakistan, Addresses India Concerns

U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce affirmed strong relations with India while defending President Trump’s engagement with Pakistan, emphasizing the importance of communication in diplomacy.

WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce recently stated that relations between the United States and India remain “good,” even as she defended Washington’s outreach to Pakistan. During a press briefing on August 12, Bruce highlighted the benefits of having a president who engages with leaders from both nations.

When asked whether President Donald Trump’s communication with Pakistan’s military leader, General Asim Munir, might come at the expense of his relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Bruce responded, “Our relationship with both nations is as it has been, which is good.” She emphasized that Trump’s diplomatic approach allows for the possibility of bridging differences between the two countries.

“That is the benefit of having a president who knows everyone, talks to everyone, and that is how we can bring differences together in this case,” Bruce explained. She reassured reporters that U.S. diplomats remain committed to fostering strong ties with both India and Pakistan.

However, Bruce did not address a follow-up question regarding whether Trump’s apparent rapport with Munir would result in increased U.S. assistance to Pakistan or a rise in arms sales to the country. This omission left some uncertainty about the implications of the U.S.-Pakistan relationship moving forward.

In June, Trump hosted Munir at a White House lunch, where he expressed gratitude for Munir’s role in avoiding escalation into war. Munir’s visit to the U.S. last week included participation in an event in Tampa, Florida, where he bid farewell to General Michael Kurilla, who recently concluded his tenure as the commander of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). This command oversees military operations in Pakistan as well as Central and West Asia.

As the U.S. continues to navigate its relationships with both India and Pakistan, the State Department’s stance reflects a commitment to maintaining diplomatic channels open while addressing regional security concerns.

Source: Original article

Trump’s New Policy on India Raises Concerns Among Indian-Americans

Trump’s recent policy decisions regarding India threaten to undermine a crucial partnership, risking generational harm to U.S.-India relations.

As potential allies go, India stands out as a significant player on the global stage. Currently the fifth-largest economy in the world, India is projected by PriceWaterhouseCoopers to ascend to the second position by 2050. In 2024, U.S. trade with India reached $212 billion, marking an 8.3% increase from the previous year. With its vast population and historical skepticism towards the Chinese Communist Party, India is well-positioned to act as a counterbalance to China’s expanding influence. Additionally, the Indian populace generally holds a favorable view of the United States.

Given this context, the Trump Administration’s decision to alienate India is perplexing. While it is true that India has continued to purchase Russian oil, this is a necessity for a nation of 1.4 billion people, where energy and fertilizer are critical for sustaining its economy. The impact of India’s oil purchases on Vladimir Putin’s strategies in Ukraine is minimal, as he could easily redirect his oil to other buyers. A simple expression of disapproval would have sufficed instead of the aggressive stance taken by the Trump Administration.

The administration has escalated tensions by doubling tariffs on Indian goods to 50%, a move that will significantly restrict trade between the two countries. Furthermore, it has openly courted the leaders of Pakistan, India’s historical rival, suggesting a potential shift in U.S. support. Trump himself has disparaged India’s economy, labeling it as “dead.”

Such actions could inflict long-term damage on U.S.-India relations, potentially transforming a promising ally into a neutral party at best, or an outright adversary at worst. Richard Fontaine from the Center for a New American Security has referred to “Global Swing States” that could align with either the U.S. or China, likening India to Pennsylvania. The current administration’s approach resembles a campaign that disparages local teams while promising economic ruin.

The rationale behind these actions is puzzling, especially considering the potential for a strong security and economic partnership between the U.S. and India. India has invested over $24 billion in U.S. military equipment, and while it still relies heavily on Russian military supplies, its imports from that country are decreasing. Moreover, India’s military cooperation with the U.S. has been growing, evidenced by participation in numerous bilateral and multilateral military exercises.

Additionally, both nations have a shared interest in combating terrorism, having faced devastating attacks in the past. This has fostered a collaborative relationship in intelligence sharing, technology, and tactical approaches, which has only strengthened in recent years.

Economically, the U.S. and India complement each other well. India is the second-largest food consumer globally, while the U.S. is the leading food exporter. The American tech industry also relies heavily on skilled Indian workers in STEM fields. As the U.S. has become a net energy exporter, India’s growing demand for energy aligns with American capabilities. Although there are instances of competition between U.S. and Indian companies, they often find themselves in complementary roles.

Despite these promising dynamics, the U.S.-India relationship is not without its challenges. India’s human rights record raises concerns, and American companies often struggle with India’s bureaucratic hurdles. Moreover, India maintains ties with nations like Russia, which complicates its alignment with the West.

However, these issues do not justify a retreat from what has been one of America’s most promising relationships. It is possible that the Trump Administration is pursuing a strategic trade deal, but if that is not the case, the current approach represents a significant miscalculation that could have lasting repercussions.

This op-ed was first published in National Security Journal.

Source: Original article

Trump Expresses Discontent Over India’s Response to U.S. Tariffs

Former diplomat Vikas Swarup discusses U.S. President Donald Trump’s dissatisfaction with India, citing tariffs and geopolitical tensions following recent military conflicts with Pakistan.

U.S. President Donald Trump’s imposition of punitive tariffs on India stems from his frustration over New Delhi’s dismissal of his claimed role in facilitating a peace agreement with Pakistan, according to former diplomat Vikas Swarup. The ex-High Commissioner to Canada emphasized that while the U.S. maintains a tactical relationship with Pakistan, its ties with India remain strategic.

In an interview with the news agency ANI, Swarup praised India’s resilience against U.S. pressure during trade negotiations, asserting that Trump’s tariffs could ultimately lead to increased inflation in the United States.

Swarup explained that Trump’s discontent with India is multifaceted. He noted that Trump perceives India’s membership in BRICS as a challenge to U.S. interests, viewing the group as an anti-American coalition intent on establishing an alternative currency to the dollar. “He feels that India should not be a member of the BRICS,” Swarup stated.

Another point of contention is India’s refusal to acknowledge Trump’s contributions to the ceasefire negotiations following the military conflict in May. New Delhi has consistently maintained that it does not accept external mediation in such matters. The ceasefire was directly negotiated between the armed forces of India and Pakistan, initiated at the request of Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations.

Trump has repeatedly asserted that he played a crucial role in de-escalating tensions between the two nuclear-armed nations, claiming credit for averting a potential nuclear conflict. “He is miffed that India has not acknowledged his role, whereas Pakistan has recognized his contributions and even nominated him for a Nobel Peace Prize,” Swarup remarked.

In early May, India conducted Operation Sindoor in response to a terror attack in Pahalgam, targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Following this, India successfully repelled further Pakistani aggression.

Swarup highlighted that India has resisted U.S. demands for greater access to its agriculture and dairy sectors, viewing Trump’s tariffs as part of a broader strategy to pressure India into compliance. He noted that this tactic also serves as a signal to Russia, as Trump has expressed frustration over President Vladimir Putin’s reluctance to agree to a ceasefire in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

As Trump prepares for a meeting with Putin in Alaska, concerns linger among Kyiv and its allies that the two leaders may attempt to dictate terms for peace in the nearly four-year-long war.

Swarup characterized Trump as a dealmaker who has positioned himself as a peacemaker in various global conflicts, including those in Thailand, Cambodia, Rwanda, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. He believes that the India-Pakistan situation is particularly significant due to the nuclear capabilities of both nations. “From that perspective, Trump feels that he deserves credit,” he said.

He also noted that Trump has expressed a desire to surpass Barack Obama, the only U.S. president to have received the Nobel Peace Prize. “He has made no secret of his longing for that Nobel Peace Prize,” Swarup added, suggesting that a successful ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine could be Trump’s ticket to such recognition.

Regarding the U.S.’s recent warming of relations with Pakistan, Swarup asserted that India’s foreign policy should not be blamed for this shift. He pointed out that Pakistan has successfully lobbied for greater access to U.S. decision-makers, which has influenced the current dynamics. “Pakistan, through some intermediaries, has gotten the ear of the U.S. President,” he said.

Swarup also mentioned Pakistan’s ambitions to become a hub for cryptocurrency, noting that a venture backed by Trump has signed a letter of intent with Pakistan’s crypto council. “I think Pakistan is now trying to position itself as the ‘Crypto King’ of South Asia,” he remarked.

Despite the current tensions, Swarup believes that India remains a vital partner for the U.S., and that the relationship is fundamentally strategic rather than transactional, unlike the U.S.-Pakistan relationship. “I think the relationship with Pakistan right now is very tactical and short-term, primarily motivated by financial gain,” he stated.

He cautioned against viewing the U.S.-Pakistan relationship as indicative of a permanent shift, describing it instead as a temporary phase. “I call it a storm, not a rupture. You just have to wait out the storms. All storms eventually pass,” he said.

Swarup criticized the U.S. for labeling India as a “Tariff King,” pointing out that the U.S. now holds that title with an average tariff of 18.4 percent compared to India’s 15.98 percent. He argued that the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration would ultimately burden American consumers and contribute to rising inflation in the U.S.

“If you cave in to a bully, then the bully will increase his demands,” he warned, asserting that India has made the right choice by maintaining its strategic autonomy. “Our strategic autonomy has been the bedrock of our foreign policy right from the 1950s,” he concluded.

In July, Trump announced a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods, which later escalated to a total of 50 percent due to India’s imports of Russian oil. This move came despite hopes for an interim trade deal that could have mitigated the impact of such tariffs.

Swarup also addressed the implications of India suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, noting that Pakistan is increasingly anxious about its water supply. He suggested that Pakistan’s military leadership is attempting to provoke fears of nuclear conflict to attract international attention. “They are deliberately provoking nuclear blackmail just so that they can catch the attention of the world,” he said.

India’s recent actions against Pakistan, particularly following the Pahalgam attack, have led to heightened tensions, with Pakistan’s military chief making nuclear threats during his visit to the United States.

Source: Original article

Pakistan’s Dependency on a Single Supplier for Fleet Management

Pakistan’s reliance on Chinese naval supplies enhances immediate capabilities but poses significant long-term risks to its operational autonomy and resilience.

Pakistan’s naval modernization efforts, heavily reliant on Chinese suppliers, have raised concerns about long-term strategic vulnerabilities. While the immediate benefits of this partnership may be apparent, the implications for autonomy and operational flexibility are significant.

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), China accounted for 81% of Pakistan’s arms imports from 2020 to 2024. This overwhelming dependence is particularly pronounced in the maritime sector, where China’s influence is nearly absolute.

The Hangor-class submarine program exemplifies this dependency, consisting of eight S-26 submarines, a derivative of the Yuan-class. Four of these submarines are to be constructed in China, while the remaining four will be built at Karachi Shipyard under a technology-transfer agreement. However, this so-called transfer is constrained by Chinese intellectual property rights, limiting Pakistan’s autonomy over sub-systems and maintenance. Consequently, Pakistan will remain reliant on China for spare parts, upgrades, and software modifications for decades to come.

Similarly, the four Type-054A/P (Tughril-class) frigates delivered between 2021 and 2023 were entirely constructed in Chinese shipyards. These vessels are equipped with Chinese combat management systems, sensors, and weaponry. Although there is a theoretical possibility of replacing these systems with alternatives, the practical challenges of interoperability with non-Chinese equipment are significant. Such changes would be costly, time-consuming, and fraught with political implications.

Proponents of this procurement strategy often cite the reluctance of Western suppliers to provide advanced naval technology to Pakistan. While this is a valid point, it does not fully capture the risks involved. By channeling nearly all major acquisitions through a single vendor, Islamabad has diminished its bargaining power. Delays in schedules, shortages of spare parts, or political negotiations can leave the Pakistan Navy with limited options. Vendor diversification is not merely a concept; it is a crucial safeguard.

Moreover, this dependence extends beyond hardware. It influences training programs, logistics frameworks, and operational doctrines. A navy that standardizes its fleet around one country’s platforms finds its tactical options increasingly dictated by that supplier’s technological and doctrinal perspectives.

The strategic implications of this dependency are profound. Chinese naval exports have encountered persistent after-sales issues in various client nations, including shortages of spare parts, ambiguous warranty enforcement, and lengthy repair timelines. For a fleet predominantly composed of Chinese vessels, these risks become systemic. In the event of a prolonged maritime crisis, the availability of operational assets—rather than mere specifications or firepower—will determine combat effectiveness.

Additionally, there are diplomatic ramifications to consider. When a nation’s primary arms supplier is also a strategic ally of its main adversary, its foreign policy maneuverability is significantly constrained. Pakistan’s ability to influence outcomes in multilateral settings or adjust its security posture without considering Beijing’s preferences is likely to diminish over time.

Addressing this dependency is neither straightforward nor immediate, but several steps could help restore a more balanced strategic posture. First, diversifying sourcing is essential. While some platforms may still need to be procured from China, sub-systems and weaponry could be acquired from other nations to broaden the supplier network.

Second, Pakistan should insist on enforceable clauses regarding spare parts and upgrades in its contracts. Performance metrics for parts availability should be established, along with penalties for non-compliance, to ensure that the navy is not left vulnerable due to supply chain issues.

Lastly, phasing procurement in alignment with fiscal realities can mitigate the risks associated with high-cost dependencies, particularly during economically challenging times.

Pakistan’s naval strategy must prioritize not only credible capabilities but also the autonomy to maintain and deploy those capabilities effectively when needed. As it stands, Islamabad risks developing a fleet that appears formidable during peacetime but is alarmingly fragile in wartime. This strategic dependence is not merely a procurement oversight; it represents a critical security vulnerability.

Source: Original article

Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi Oppose Supreme Court Order on Stray Dogs

Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi criticize the Supreme Court’s order to remove stray dogs from Delhi-NCR, advocating for humane solutions that prioritize animal welfare alongside public safety.

New Delhi: Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Congress MP from Wayanad, have expressed strong opposition to the Supreme Court’s recent order mandating the removal of all stray dogs from the Delhi-NCR region. They described the ruling as a regressive step away from decades of humane and science-based policies, emphasizing that such blanket removals are both cruel and shortsighted.

In a post on X, Rahul Gandhi stated, “The Supreme Court’s directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR is a step back from decades of humane, science-backed policy.” He further argued that these “voiceless souls are not ‘problems’ to be erased,” advocating instead for solutions that include shelters, sterilization, vaccination, and community care to ensure public safety without resorting to cruelty.

“Blanket removals are cruel, shortsighted, and strip us of compassion. We can ensure public safety and animal welfare go hand in hand,” he added, highlighting the need for a more compassionate approach to managing stray dogs.

Priyanka Gandhi, who serves as Congress General Secretary, echoed her brother’s sentiments, voicing her concerns about the implications of the Supreme Court’s order. In her own post on X, she remarked, “The moving of all the city’s stray dogs to shelters within a matter of weeks is going to result in horrendously inhumane treatment of them. Enough shelters do not even exist to take them on.”

She pointed out that animals in urban environments are often subjected to mistreatment and brutality, emphasizing the need for a more humane solution. “Surely there is a better way to manage the situation, and a humane way can be found in which these innocent animals are looked after and kept safe as well,” she said.

Priyanka Gandhi also expressed her affection for dogs, stating, “Dogs are the most beautiful, gentle creatures; they do not deserve this kind of cruelty.”

The Congress leaders’ remarks followed the Supreme Court’s order issued on Monday, which directed that all stray dogs in the Delhi-NCR area be picked up within eight weeks and housed in dog shelters. The Court, which was addressing a suo motu case concerning dog bites in the national capital, specified that no stray canines would be allowed to return to the streets after being collected.

In a stern warning, the Supreme Court stated, “If any person or organization comes in the way of picking up of stray dogs, action will be taken.” This directive has raised significant concerns among animal welfare advocates and the public, prompting calls for more humane alternatives to address the issue of stray dogs in urban areas.

The ongoing debate highlights the need for a balanced approach that considers both public safety and the welfare of animals, as advocates urge for policies that prioritize humane treatment over removal.

Source: Original article

Israel’s Netanyahu Considers Allowing Palestinians to Leave Gaza During Truce Efforts

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has proposed allowing Palestinians to exit the Gaza Strip as the military gears up for an expanded offensive in the region.

On Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reiterated his stance on permitting Palestinians to leave the Gaza Strip. This announcement comes as the Israeli military is poised to launch a more extensive offensive in the territory.

The situation in Gaza has been increasingly tense, with ongoing military operations and humanitarian concerns. Netanyahu’s comments reflect a strategic consideration as Israel navigates the complexities of the conflict and its implications for civilian safety.

As the military prepares for its next steps, the proposal to allow Palestinians to exit the area raises questions about the humanitarian impact and the broader geopolitical ramifications. The potential for a temporary truce or safe passage for civilians is a critical aspect of discussions surrounding the conflict.

Netanyahu’s administration has faced pressure both domestically and internationally regarding its approach to the situation in Gaza. Allowing civilians to leave could be seen as a measure to alleviate humanitarian concerns, but it also poses challenges related to security and the ongoing military objectives.

The Israeli government has been under scrutiny for its handling of the conflict, with calls for a more comprehensive strategy that addresses both security needs and humanitarian considerations. The proposal to allow Palestinians to exit Gaza may be part of a broader effort to navigate these complex issues.

As developments unfold, the international community is closely monitoring the situation, with hopes for a resolution that prioritizes the safety and well-being of civilians caught in the conflict.

According to NDTV, Netanyahu’s remarks signal a significant moment in the ongoing discourse surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Source: Original article

US Comments on India-Pakistan Tensions Following Army Chief’s Nuclear Threat

Washington has reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining strong ties with both India and Pakistan following recent nuclear threats made by Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir during his visit to the United States.

In the wake of Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir’s recent visit to the United States, Washington has reiterated that its relationship with both India and Pakistan “remains unchanged.” The U.S. State Department emphasized its commitment to both nations, despite the heightened tensions stemming from Munir’s alarming remarks.

During his second visit to the U.S. in just two months, Munir made headlines by threatening to initiate a nuclear conflict against India, claiming he could take down “half the world.” This marked a significant moment, as it was the first time nuclear threats were publicly articulated from U.S. soil directed at a third country.

At a State Department briefing, spokesperson Tammy Bruce highlighted the U.S. involvement in mediating tensions between India and Pakistan during previous military conflicts. She referred to President Donald Trump’s administration’s efforts as a “very proud” achievement, noting their role in preventing a potential catastrophe.

“We had an experience with Pakistan and India, when there was a conflict, that could have developed into something quite horrible,” Bruce stated. She detailed the immediate actions taken by top U.S. officials, including Vice President JD Vance, President Trump, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, to address the situation and foster dialogue between the two nations.

Bruce elaborated on the nature of the diplomatic efforts, saying, “We described the nature of the phone calls and the work we did to stop the attacks, bringing the parties together to create something enduring.” She expressed pride in the U.S. leadership’s role in averting disaster during those tense moments.

When questioned about the implications of Munir’s recent meeting with Trump on U.S. military assistance and arms sales to Pakistan, Bruce assured that the U.S. relationship with both countries remains strong. “The diplomats are committed to both nations,” she affirmed, dismissing concerns that U.S. support for Pakistan would come at the expense of its relationship with India.

Bruce also addressed the ongoing U.S.-Pakistan counter-terrorism dialogue, which was recently established in Islamabad. She noted that during the latest rounds of talks, both nations reaffirmed their shared commitment to combat terrorism in all its forms. “The United States and Pakistan discussed ways to enhance cooperation to counter terrorist threats,” she said.

In her closing remarks, Bruce emphasized the importance of U.S. engagement with both India and Pakistan, stating, “For the region and for the world, the U.S. working with both those nations is good news and will promote a future that’s beneficial.”

Munir’s visit to the U.S. follows a private luncheon with Trump in June and included a series of high-level meetings with U.S. political and military leaders. The timing of his trip and the nature of his comments have raised concerns about the stability of the region and the potential for escalating tensions.

As the situation unfolds, the U.S. continues to navigate its complex relationships with both India and Pakistan, aiming to maintain peace and stability in South Asia.

Source: Original article

Washington Navigates Complexities of Munir’s Anti-India Nuclear Posturing

Washington faces a diplomatic dilemma after Pakistan’s army chief, General Asim Munir, made nuclear threats against India during a visit to the U.S. military.

Washington finds itself in a precarious position following remarks made by Pakistan’s army chief, General Asim Munir, during his recent visit to the United States. While attending various military ceremonies as an honored guest, Munir’s anti-India rhetoric, described by Indian officials as “nuclear sabre-rattling,” has left American defense and diplomatic agencies in a state of uncertainty regarding how to respond.

During his visit, Munir participated in the retirement ceremony for General Michael E. Kurilla, the outgoing chief of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), and the change-of-command ceremony for Admiral Brad Cooper. He also met with senior military leaders, including General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. However, it was a private dinner in Tampa that reportedly raised eyebrows, where Munir allegedly warned that if Pakistan were cornered, it would be prepared to “take half the world down with it.” This statement was interpreted as a thinly veiled threat directed at India.

In the days following these remarks, inquiries were made to several U.S. agencies, including the Department of Defense, the Pentagon, the State Department, and CENTCOM, seeking their stance on Munir’s comments made while on U.S. soil. Questions focused on whether such public threats of nuclear destruction towards another sovereign nation were acceptable conduct for a senior military official visiting the United States. Each agency opted for silence or provided a terse “no comment.” Even the State Department, which typically emphasizes responsible nuclear stewardship, refrained from addressing Munir’s statements.

Analysts suggest that Munir’s comments have placed Washington in a diplomatic bind. Publicly defending his remarks could be perceived as tacit approval of nuclear threats against India, a key strategic partner. Conversely, a public rebuke could alienate Pakistan’s powerful military, which the U.S. still relies on for counterterrorism cooperation, regional intelligence, and maintaining its presence in Afghanistan.

This situation highlights a significant miscalculation by the Trump administration and some of its senior advisors, who underestimated the political instincts of Pakistan’s military. They appeared to believe that ceremonial invitations and military honors would temper aggressive rhetoric. Instead, Munir’s actions have demonstrated a willingness to leverage American soil to amplify anti-India nuclear messaging.

As the situation unfolds, Washington must navigate these complex diplomatic waters carefully, balancing its relationships with both Pakistan and India while addressing the implications of Munir’s statements.

Source: Original article

Peace Should Not Be Imposed on Ukraine, Say UK and Canada

British and Canadian leaders emphasize that any peace in Ukraine should be developed in collaboration with Kyiv, not imposed from outside.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney have reached a consensus regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. They assert that any peace agreement must be constructed in partnership with Kyiv rather than being imposed upon it.

This statement was made public by a spokesperson from Downing Street on Monday, highlighting the importance of Ukrainian agency in the peace process.

The leaders’ remarks come ahead of anticipated discussions between the United States and Russia, where the future of Ukraine is expected to be a significant topic of conversation.

Starmer and Carney’s position reflects a broader commitment to ensuring that Ukraine’s sovereignty and interests are prioritized in any negotiations aimed at resolving the conflict.

As the situation in Ukraine continues to evolve, the emphasis on collaborative peace-building efforts underscores the necessity of involving the Ukrainian government and its people in shaping their future.

This approach aims to foster a more sustainable and legitimate resolution to the ongoing crisis, rather than one that may disregard the needs and aspirations of those directly affected by the war.

The dialogue between the UK and Canada signals a unified stance among Western allies regarding the handling of the Ukraine situation, reinforcing the message that peace must be a product of mutual agreement and respect for Ukraine’s autonomy.

As international discussions progress, the focus remains on finding a pathway that honors the voices of Ukrainians while addressing the geopolitical complexities of the region.

According to NDTV, the emphasis on a collaborative peace process is crucial as the world watches the developments in Ukraine closely.

Source: Original article

Ousted Karnataka Minister Alleges Conspiracy, Plans Meeting with Rahul Gandhi

KN Rajanna, Karnataka’s ousted minister, claims he is a victim of conspiracy following his dismissal over controversial remarks about voter theft.

KN Rajanna, a former Karnataka minister and close aide to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, has asserted that he has fallen victim to a “big conspiracy” after being dropped from the ministry due to his comments regarding voter theft. Rajanna announced plans to travel to Delhi to meet with senior party leaders, including Rahul Gandhi and KC Venugopal, to “clarify the misunderstanding” surrounding his remarks.

His dismissal comes amid rising tensions within the Congress party, particularly after Rajanna’s comments suggested that the party was in power when issues with the voter list arose. This has sparked a significant political controversy, with the BJP seizing upon his statements as ammunition against the Congress party.

Rajanna’s remarks indicated that the Congress should have addressed the alleged irregularities in the voter lists when they were first identified. “When was the voter list prepared? It was prepared when our own government was in power. At that time, were everyone just sitting quietly with eyes closed? These irregularities happened right in front of our eyes — we should feel ashamed. We didn’t take care of it at the time,” he stated, inadvertently providing the BJP with a strong critique of the Congress’s handling of the issue.

Following a day of heated discussions, including debates in the assembly, Rajanna was officially removed from his ministerial position. In a statement made later that evening, he expressed his intent to seek clarity on the situation, saying, “I won’t give any details now; you can use the word resignation, ouster, or let go, but behind all this, there is a big conspiracy and planning.” He further indicated that he would reveal more about the circumstances surrounding his dismissal at an appropriate time.

Rajanna’s comments have led to speculation about the internal dynamics of the Congress party. Sources suggest that while Chief Minister Siddaramaiah was initially reluctant to let Rajanna go, he ultimately complied after discussions with senior Congress leader KC Venugopal. Rajanna, along with several MLAs and ministers who support him, is reportedly considering their next steps and may seek further discussions with Siddaramaiah.

The situation remains precarious for Rajanna, as the Congress high command is closely monitoring developments. Another controversial statement from him could result in severe repercussions.

According to reports, the political fallout from Rajanna’s remarks has intensified the scrutiny on the Congress party’s internal affairs, particularly regarding its handling of voter-related issues. The party’s leadership is now faced with the challenge of addressing both the public perception and the internal dissent that has emerged from this incident.

Source: Original article

Rahul Gandhi Calls ‘Vote Chori’ an Attack on Democracy, Demands Digital Voter Rolls

Rahul Gandhi has called for the release of digital voter rolls, asserting that allegations of vote theft undermine the principle of ‘one man, one vote’ in the upcoming 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

New Delhi: Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, has once again criticized the Election Commission, asserting that allegations of vote theft represent an attack on the foundational principle of ‘one man, one vote.’ He has demanded the release of digital voter rolls to ensure transparency in the electoral process, particularly in light of claims of significant vote manipulation in the upcoming 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

On Sunday, Gandhi took to X (formerly Twitter) to voice his concerns, stating, “Vote Chori is an attack on the foundational idea of ‘one man, one vote.'” He emphasized the necessity of clean voter rolls for the integrity of free and fair elections, urging the Election Commission to be transparent and allow both the public and political parties to audit the voter rolls.

In his post, he reiterated, “A clean voter roll is imperative for free and fair elections. Our demand from the EC is clear—be transparent and release digital voter rolls so that people and parties can audit them.” He also provided a mobile number and website for supporters to join his campaign, encouraging citizens to visit votechori.in/ecdemand or give a missed call to 9650003420 to participate in the movement aimed at safeguarding democracy.

Gandhi’s comments come in the wake of serious allegations he made on August 7 regarding extensive vote theft during the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. He presented evidence to support his claims, detailing that approximately 100,250 votes were allegedly stolen in the Mahadevapura assembly constituency in Karnataka.

In his presentation, Gandhi outlined five distinct types of voter theft, which included 11,965 duplicate voters, 40,009 instances of fake and invalid addresses, 10,452 bulk voters registered at a single address, 4,133 invalid photographs, and 33,692 cases of misuse of Form 6.

These allegations have intensified the ongoing conflict between Gandhi and the Election Commission, as he continues to advocate for electoral reforms and greater transparency in the voting process. The call for digital voter rolls is part of a broader push to ensure that the electoral system remains fair and accountable.

As the 2024 elections approach, the debate over the integrity of the electoral process is expected to intensify, with political leaders and parties closely monitoring the actions of the Election Commission.

According to The Sunday Guardian, Gandhi’s campaign highlights the critical importance of maintaining public trust in the electoral system and the need for reforms to address potential vulnerabilities.

Source: Original article

Two J&K Police Sub-Inspectors Killed in Srinagar Road Accident

Two Jammu and Kashmir Police Sub-Inspectors were killed and another injured in a road accident in Srinagar, prompting an investigation into the incident.

Srinagar: In a tragic incident, two Sub-Inspectors from the Jammu and Kashmir Police lost their lives, while another officer sustained injuries in a late-night road accident in the Nowgam area of Srinagar.

The accident occurred during the night of August 10 and 11, when a speeding KIA vehicle, with registration number JK21H-1919, lost control and crashed into a road divider at the Tengen Bypass near Nowgam.

Three Sub-Inspectors were traveling in the vehicle at the time of the accident. They were immediately rushed to a nearby hospital for treatment. Unfortunately, two of the officers were pronounced dead on arrival, while the third officer is currently receiving medical care.

The deceased have been identified as Sachin Verma, a Sub-Inspector with the 23 Battalion of the Indian Reserve Police (IRP) currently posted at Pantha Chowk, and Shubham Sait, a Sub-Inspector with the 21 Battalion IRP, stationed at Awantipora. The injured officer has been identified as Mastan Singh, also from the 23 Battalion IRP.

Authorities have taken cognizance of the incident, and an investigation is underway to determine the exact cause of the accident.

Source: Original article

Kashmir Prepares for Independence Day with Increased Security Measures

Kashmir is enhancing security measures with increased troop deployments and surveillance ahead of Independence Day to ensure safe and peaceful celebrations across the region.

Srinagar: As Independence Day approaches, security has been significantly heightened across all districts of Kashmir. Authorities have implemented comprehensive arrangements to ensure the peaceful and smooth conduct of celebrations throughout the region.

Major highways, including the Jammu-Srinagar National Highway, are under high alert. Additional deployments of security forces, including the Border Security Force (BSF), Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), and Jammu & Kashmir Police, have been made along key routes. New bunkers have also been established at strategic locations to bolster vigilance and ensure public safety.

In the northern border districts of Baramulla, Kupwara, and Bandipora, there has been a notable increase in troop presence, both in the hinterlands and the plains. Intelligence reports indicate a heightened threat level in areas along the Line of Control (LoC) due to ongoing infiltration attempts by terrorists from across the border. In response, the Indian Army and BSF are employing advanced surveillance technologies to counter any potential threats.

Across Kashmir, patriotic fervor is on the rise as Tiranga rallies are being organized in the lead-up to August 15. Various organizations and local bodies are actively participating in the celebrations, highlighting a collective spirit of unity among the populace.

Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Baramulla, Gurinder Pal Singh, addressed the media regarding the district’s preparedness. He announced that Independence Day celebrations will occur at 147 venues, including remote areas and locations near the LoC.

SSP Singh assured the public that foolproof security arrangements have been established, with intensified surveillance and force deployment aimed at preventing any untoward incidents. “All necessary protocols are in place to ensure the safety of citizens and dignitaries during the celebrations,” he stated.

The administration has called on the public to cooperate with security forces and participate in the national celebrations with unity, enthusiasm, and respect for the nation.

Source: Original article

Tibet’s Ongoing Struggle for Justice Amid China’s Firm Control

Despite decades of international appeals for Tibetan rights, China’s firm grip on the region persists, with ongoing restrictions on culture, religion, and freedoms.

Since the Dalai Lama’s flight from Tibet in 1959 following an uprising against Chinese rule, the United Nations has expressed deep concern for the human rights and freedoms of the Tibetan people. Through Resolution 1353 (XIV), the UN called for the protection of these rights, marking the beginning of a long-standing dialogue on the issue.

In the early 1960s, the UN adopted two additional resolutions that served as moral rebukes to Beijing’s actions, affirming Tibet’s right to self-determination. Over the decades, the international community has urged China to ease its stringent control over Tibet and cease its campaign to assimilate Tibetans into a Han-dominated culture, which threatens their unique cultural and religious identities.

From Washington to Brussels, numerous statements of concern have been issued, with high commissioners seeking access to the region and coalitions of nations forming to censure Beijing. However, China has remained resolute in its refusal to change its approach, framing its continued occupation of Tibet as a matter of sovereignty and national unity. According to Beijing, Tibet has been “an inseparable part of China since antiquity” and is now a model of economic progress.

Criticism, even from the Tibetan people whom China claims to have uplifted, is dismissed as politically motivated interference. This stance has persisted through various global eras, from the Cold War to China’s emergence as a global power.

Nearly seven decades after the uprising, the situation in Tibet remains dire. Reports indicate ongoing restrictions on religion and language, mass detentions, and a lack of access for independent observers.

The language of international appeals has evolved over the years, yet the core message has remained consistent. Following violent protests in Lhasa in the late 1980s, the U.S. Congress recognized Tibet as an “occupied country” and praised the Dalai Lama’s proposals for a negotiated settlement. The European Parliament echoed this sentiment with its own declarations, some explicitly endorsing his peace plans.

In 1991, the UN Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities broke a 26-year silence by adopting a resolution on Tibet, calling for an end to policies that threaten the Tibetan people’s cultural and religious identity. Human rights rapporteurs have pressed Beijing for access and accountability, raising concerns about religious freedom and torture.

The message gained further momentum in 2012 when Navi Pillay, then the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, warned that “social stability in Tibet will never be achieved through heavy security measures and suppression of human rights.” In 2020, a coalition of 39 countries, including Britain, Japan, and nearly all European Union members, called for “immediate and unfettered access” to Tibet for independent observers, marking one of the strongest joint statements in years.

Despite these moments of unity, tangible change on the ground has remained elusive. Beijing has allowed the appeals to accumulate without facing real accountability for its actions. In fact, China’s position has only become more entrenched. Since the 2008 uprising, the Communist Party has implemented policies of near-total control over religious institutions, intensified “patriotic education” campaigns in monasteries, and established extensive surveillance systems across the Tibetan plateau.

Political dissent is met with severe punishment. Advocates for cultural rights, such as Tashi Wangchuk, have faced years of imprisonment on charges of “inciting separatism,” a broad term that conflates peaceful expression with a threat to the state. The boy recognized by the Dalai Lama as the Panchen Lama has been missing since 1995, despite repeated UN requests for proof of his well-being.

China’s response to UN criticism has been consistently dismissive. The government rejects all allegations of abuse, accuses the UN of bias, and mobilizes a bloc of supportive states to counter any resolutions or debates. Requests for visits to Tibet by high commissioners or special rapporteurs are often met with the same refrain: not now, not convenient. No UN human rights chief has been permitted in since 1998, and no special rapporteur has visited since 2005.

The UN’s record on Tibet has been characterized by a lack of decisive action. No Tibet-specific resolution has been passed in the General Assembly since 1965. The former UN Commission on Human Rights failed to adopt a resolution on Tibet, with Chinese diplomats repeatedly blocking action through procedural tactics. The Human Rights Council, which replaced the commission in 2006, has similarly struggled, with China rejecting most recommendations outright.

China’s status as a permanent member of the Security Council, along with its economic influence over developing countries and a growing bloc of allies, has shielded it from meaningful censure. This has resulted in a pattern of rhetorical condemnation without enforcement, allowing Beijing to absorb international concern without facing consequences.

The trajectory of Tibet’s treatment at the UN illustrates the limitations of moral persuasion in the absence of political will. While strong words have been plentiful in resolutions and statements, what has been lacking is the mechanism and unity to translate those words into actions that China cannot easily ignore.

If the international community is serious about addressing human rights abuses in Tibet, it must move beyond symbolic gestures. This could involve establishing a dedicated UN mechanism to monitor China’s treatment of Tibetans, linking access to economic or diplomatic benefits, or at the very least, insisting on regular, unmonitored visits by human rights experts. Without such measures, every statement of concern risks becoming just another entry in a long, ineffective record.

Source: Original article

Security Forces Conduct Major Anti-Terror Operation in Reasi Village

Security forces have initiated a significant anti-terror operation in Godhar Khalsa village, Reasi district, following a shopkeeper’s report of suspicious individuals in the area.

Jammu – Security forces have launched a comprehensive anti-terror operation in Godhar Khalsa village, located in Reasi district, after a local shopkeeper reported a late-night encounter with suspected individuals in a nearby forest.

The incident occurred around 1:55 a.m. when the shopkeeper was returning home after closing his store. He recounted that the suspects approached him, took some pears he was carrying, and instructed him to leave without causing him any harm. “Their presence was suspicious, and I immediately informed the police,” he stated.

In response to the shopkeeper’s report, the Jammu and Kashmir Police, in collaboration with other security agencies, cordoned off the village at first light. They launched an intensive search operation aimed at identifying and neutralizing any potential terrorist presence in the area.

Godhar Khalsa is situated along the Jammu–Poonch Highway and is not far from the Line of Control (LoC)-facing Sunderbani sector, a route historically used for infiltration.

Following the recent Operation Sindoor, which targeted multiple terrorist launch pads and airbases in Pakistan, security forces have increased surveillance across Jammu and Kashmir. They are conducting aggressive search-and-destroy missions in suspected militant hideouts in Rajouri, Poonch, Reasi, and other vulnerable areas.

A senior police officer emphasized the clarity of their mission: “No movement corridor will be left unchecked. If terrorists are in the area, they will be traced and neutralized.”

The operation in Godhar Khalsa is ongoing, with additional reinforcements deployed and all exit routes sealed to prevent any potential escape of suspects.

Source: Original article

US Lawmaker: H-1B Visas Key to Physician Shortage Solution

Congressman Greg Murphy emphasized the importance of H-1B visas in addressing the physician shortage in the U.S., a stance that ignited criticism and highlighted a contentious debate.

Congressman Greg Murphy, a Republican from North Carolina’s 3rd district, recently drew significant attention for his comments regarding the use of H-1B visas to address critical shortages in the U.S. healthcare system. Murphy, who is also a practicing physician, argued that foreign-trained medical graduates play an essential role, particularly in underserved rural areas, where the physician shortfall is most acute.

In a post on X, dated August 8, Murphy stated, “H1-B Visas are critical for helping alleviate the severe physician shortage this nation faces. We cannot train enough American Doctors fast enough. We can’t let lack of knowledge of the importance of this program affect patient care.”

This assertion by the 62-year-old lawmaker comes against the backdrop of an ongoing immigration debate in the United States, further inflamed by policy discussions under the Trump administration. Notably, information reported by The New York Times on July 26 cited Joseph Edlow, the then-new Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, who indicated that the administration might implement stricter H-1B guidelines.

Despite Murphy’s stance, his comments met with a wave of criticism, particularly on social media, where many disputed his claims. Several responses, predominantly from Trump supporters, challenged the notion that H-1B visas are indispensable for addressing physician shortages.

One user commented on the discrepancy between Murphy’s statement and the actual utilization of H-1B visas in North Carolina. “Congressman says H-1B is ‘critical’ to fix the doctor shortage. Reality: In NC, 97.7% of H-1Bs aren’t medical, and most of the 2.3% ‘medical’ roles aren’t doctors at all,” read one such comment.

Others highlighted that American medical graduates often face barriers to obtaining residency positions, suggesting that foreign medical graduates are prioritized over local students. “Actually, H-1Bs are not critical for the medical system,” one user argued. “We have American medical students who are denied residency programs because the medical establishment limits them.”

Such sentiments were echoed by individuals who contended that the residency cap set by Congress unfairly limits opportunities for American graduates, while universities allegedly favor international students who pay higher tuition fees. “This is demonstrably false. Universities have been discriminating against U.S. citizens because international students usually pay over double in-state tuition,” stated another commenter.

Another critical voice argued, “Nope. We are done with politicians putting Americans last. You want less qualified doctors instead of funding more residencies or ensuring that American students are given priority in school over foreigners.”

The U.S. faces a complex challenge in addressing its physician shortage, with arguments for and against the H-1B visa program reflecting broader tensions between immigration policy and domestic workforce development.

-+=