Alex Saab, Maduro Ally, Arrested in U.S.-Venezuelan Operation

Venezuelan official Alex Saab was reportedly arrested in a joint U.S.-Venezuela operation, although his lawyer denies the report as “fake news.”

Alex Saab, a Venezuelan official and close ally of former President Nicolás Maduro, was reportedly arrested in Venezuela on Wednesday during a joint operation involving U.S. and Venezuelan authorities, according to a U.S. law enforcement official.

Saab, 54, who previously faced charges in the U.S., is expected to be extradited to the United States in the coming days, the official told Reuters. However, Saab’s lawyer, Luigi Giuliano, dismissed the arrest as “fake news” in comments to the Colombian newspaper El Espectador.

In a statement to the Venezuelan news site TalCual, Giuliano indicated that Saab might address the allegations personally but was currently in consultation with the government regarding the situation. Meanwhile, journalists associated with the Venezuelan government also took to social media to deny the reports of Saab’s arrest.

Jorge Rodríguez, Venezuela’s top lawmaker, refrained from confirming or denying the reports during a press conference, stating that he had no information about Saab’s possible arrest.

This development follows a recent U.S. operation aimed at targeting Venezuela and arresting Maduro, alongside the Trump administration’s actions to seize oil tankers linked to the country. Saab’s arrest could signal a new level of cooperation between U.S. and Venezuelan authorities under interim President Delcy Rodríguez, who previously served as Maduro’s deputy and currently oversees Venezuela’s law enforcement agencies.

The U.S. official emphasized the importance of Rodríguez’s collaboration in this joint operation. Additionally, Raul Gorrin, the head of Venezuela’s Globovision TV network, was also reported to have been arrested during the operation.

Saab, originally from Colombia, was detained in Cape Verde in 2020 and spent over three years in U.S. custody on bribery charges. He was granted clemency in exchange for the release of American detainees held in Venezuela. Prior to his clemency, U.S. officials accused Saab of siphoning approximately $350 million out of Venezuela through a bribery scheme linked to the country’s state-controlled exchange rate.

Saab has consistently denied these allegations and sought to have the charges dismissed, claiming diplomatic immunity. However, an appeals court had not ruled on his appeal by the time the prisoner swap occurred.

Upon his return to Venezuela at the end of 2023, Maduro praised Saab for his loyalty to the socialist revolution and referred to him as a national hero. Following the arrest of the country’s former leader, Saab was appointed as industry minister, a role he held until last month when he was dismissed by Rodríguez.

This situation continues to unfold, and further developments are anticipated as both U.S. and Venezuelan authorities navigate the complexities of their relationship.

According to Reuters, the implications of Saab’s arrest and the broader context of U.S.-Venezuelan relations remain significant.

U.S. DOE Appoints Indian-Americans to Key Advisory Positions

The U.S. Department of Energy has appointed three Indian-American scientists to its newly established advisory committee, emphasizing their expertise in energy and technology.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has appointed three Indian-American scientists to its newly formed Office of Science Advisory Committee (SCAC), which is tasked with shaping the future of U.S. science and technology policy.

The SCAC will provide independent guidance on research priorities, emerging technologies, and cross-cutting scientific challenges that impact the nation’s energy agenda. This initiative comes at a critical time when the U.S. government is emphasizing innovation in fields such as fusion energy, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence.

Among the 21 members appointed to the advisory panel are Supratik Guha, Suresh Garimella, and A.N. Sreeram. Each brings a wealth of expertise in materials science, engineering, and advanced manufacturing.

Supratik Guha is a professor at the University of Chicago’s Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering and a researcher at Argonne National Laboratory. He has dedicated much of his career to the intersection of nanoscience and applied technology. Guha previously led Argonne’s Center for Nanoscale Materials and spent two decades at IBM Research, focusing on nanoscale materials and devices.

Suresh Garimella serves as the president of the University of Arizona and is a trained mechanical engineer with extensive academic and advisory experience. He has been a member of the National Science Board, a presidentially appointed body that oversees the National Science Foundation. Additionally, Garimella has held advisory roles with Sandia National Laboratories and the U.S. State Department, focusing on scientific collaboration.

A.N. Sreeram is the senior vice president and chief technology officer at Dow, where he holds more than 20 patents and has a long history in industrial research. His work emphasizes accelerating the transformation of scientific breakthroughs into commercial products. Sreeram has also served on the White House’s President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

Another notable member of Indian origin is Pushmeet Kohli, a British Indian computer scientist and vice president of science and strategic initiatives at Google DeepMind. His work primarily focuses on machine learning and AI-driven discovery.

Officials have indicated that SCAC’s broad mandate includes advising on federal research priorities, facilitating collaboration across national laboratories and universities, and helping the Department of Energy anticipate and adapt to new technological trends. The committee is expected to play a strategic role as the U.S. navigates competition in critical fields such as quantum science and climate-related technologies.

DOE Under Secretary for Science Darío Gil, who oversees the Office of Science, highlighted the importance of diverse expertise in achieving the department’s mission. “By bringing together leading minds from diverse institutions, we’re forging a collaborative framework that will accelerate the translation of fundamental research into tangible benefits for the American people,” Gil stated.

The appointments reflect the growing influence of Indian-Americans in U.S. science and the DOE’s commitment to harnessing global talent to advance national research priorities. The advisory committee is set to serve through January 2028, with its findings expected to inform DOE decisions.

SCAC will be chaired by Persis Drell, a professor of materials science and engineering and physics at Stanford University, who is also the provost emerita of Stanford and director emerita of SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. The committee will adopt the core functions of the Office of Science’s six former discretionary advisory committees.

According to The American Bazaar, the establishment of SCAC marks a significant step in integrating diverse expertise into U.S. energy policy and research initiatives.

NextRoll Appoints Indian-American Vibhor Kapoor as CEO

NextRoll has appointed Indian American Vibhor Kapoor as CEO, succeeding Roli Saxena, as the digital advertising landscape experiences significant changes and growth.

NextRoll, the marketing technology company known for its AdRoll connected advertising platform, has announced the promotion of Vibhor Kapoor from chief business officer to chief executive officer.

Roli Saxena, who has led the company as CEO since 2022, will transition to the role of executive chair of the board and chief strategy officer. This leadership change comes at a time when the digital advertising market is experiencing both structural shifts and expansion.

As the industry evolves, Kapoor takes the helm amid increasing competition and margin pressures in core display advertising. Marketers are increasingly reallocating their investments toward emerging channels, including connected TV (CTV), digital out-of-home (DOOH), and AI-driven marketing strategies.

NextRoll emphasized that this leadership transition underscores its commitment to executing its core business while also investing in capabilities that support long-term growth.

“As our industry evolves, we need relentless operational focus alongside clear, sustained investment in the future,” Saxena stated. “This transition allows us to do both. Vibhor is a proven operator with deep knowledge of our business, and I’m excited to support him as CEO while focusing my energy on NextRoll’s long-term innovation and growth strategy.”

Kapoor has been with NextRoll for the past four years, holding various senior leadership roles, including chief marketing officer and chief business officer. In these positions, he was instrumental in unifying NextRoll’s advertising and account-based marketing offerings under the AdRoll brand, enhancing product positioning and go-to-market execution. His efforts have helped evolve the platform into a comprehensive, privacy-forward advertising solution.

The AdRoll platform integrates two key offerings: the AdRoll product, which assists brands in generating awareness, enhancing engagement, and driving measurable revenue through AI-powered multi-channel campaigns, and AdRoll ABM, a full-funnel account-based marketing product. The latter combines buyer insights, predictive AI, and multi-touch advertising to accelerate pipeline and revenue for B2B teams. Together, these solutions provide marketers with the clarity, efficiency, and performance necessary for confident growth.

Before joining NextRoll, Kapoor held senior marketing and go-to-market leadership roles at major companies such as Adobe, Box, and Microsoft. With a marketing background and three decades of industry experience, he has a proven track record of delivering results during transformative periods.

“NextRoll is clear on where we win and what it takes to execute,” Kapoor remarked. “I’ve seen this business from every angle, and my job as CEO is to turn that clarity into consistent performance, stronger customer outcomes, and a business that scales with discipline.”

In his new role, Kapoor will oversee operations and lead the executive leadership team, collaborating closely with Saxena and the board to align immediate execution with long-term strategic priorities.

Kapoor holds an MBA in Marketing, Management Strategy, and Entrepreneurship from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management. He also earned a BTech Engineering degree from the Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University) in Varanasi, and completed a Management Development Program in Marketing, Finance, and Organizational Behavior at XLRI Jamshedpur.

The leadership change at NextRoll reflects the company’s strategic vision and commitment to navigating the evolving landscape of digital advertising, positioning itself for future growth and innovation.

According to The American Bazaar, this transition marks a pivotal moment for NextRoll as it adapts to the changing dynamics of the marketing technology sector.

PM Modi and President Trump Reach Agreement on Trade Deal

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump have announced a new trade deal, reducing U.S. tariffs on Indian products from 25% to 18%.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi took to social media platform X on Monday to express his enthusiasm following a conversation with President Donald Trump. In his post, he conveyed gratitude for the reduced tariff on made-in-India products, which will now be set at 18%. “Big thanks to President Trump on behalf of the 1.4 billion people of India for this wonderful announcement,” PM Modi stated.

Highlighting the significance of collaboration between two of the world’s largest democracies, Modi emphasized that such partnerships create opportunities for mutual benefit. “When two large economies work together, it benefits our people and unlocks immense opportunities for cooperation,” he remarked.

Modi praised Trump’s leadership, asserting its importance for global peace, stability, and prosperity. “India fully supports his efforts for peace. I look forward to working closely with him to take our partnership to unprecedented heights,” he added.

In a parallel announcement, President Trump confirmed the trade deal during his own social media update on Truth Social. He noted that he and Modi had agreed to lower the Reciprocal Tariff from 25% to 18%. Trump characterized Modi as one of his “greatest friends” and acknowledged him as a powerful and respected leader. He expressed confidence in their ability to achieve results together.

During their conversation, Trump also mentioned discussions surrounding global issues, including the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. “It was an honor to speak with Prime Minister Modi of India this morning. We spoke about many things, including trade and ending the war with Russia and Ukraine,” Trump stated.

Furthermore, Trump highlighted India’s commitment to cease purchasing Russian oil, indicating a shift towards increased energy imports from the United States. “He agreed to stop buying Russian oil and to buy much more from the United States and, potentially, Venezuela,” Trump noted.

Trump also claimed that India would work towards reducing tariffs and non-tariff barriers against U.S. goods, a move that could further enhance trade relations between the two nations.

U.S. Ambassador to India, Sergio Gor, confirmed that President Trump had indeed spoken with Prime Minister Modi earlier on the same day, reinforcing the importance of their dialogue.

This recent agreement follows a previous conversation between Modi and Trump in December of last year, where both leaders expressed their commitment to addressing shared challenges and advancing common interests.

The announcement of the trade deal marks a significant step in U.S.-India relations, with both leaders optimistic about the potential for future collaboration.

According to The Free Press Journal, the new tariff structure is expected to benefit various sectors in India, enhancing the competitiveness of Indian products in the U.S. market.

Indian-American Climate Scientist Veerabhadran Ramanathan Awarded Crafoord Prize

Veerabhadran Ramanathan, an esteemed Indian American climate scientist, has been awarded the prestigious Crafoord Prize for his groundbreaking research on climate pollutants and their impact on the atmosphere.

Veerabhadran Ramanathan, a prominent Indian American climate scientist affiliated with the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego, has been named the 2026 recipient of the Crafoord Prize, one of the most esteemed awards in the scientific community.

The Crafoord Prize is awarded collaboratively by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and the Crafoord Foundation in Lund, Sweden. Ramanathan will receive the prize, valued at eight million Swedish kronor (approximately $900,000), during the “Crafoord Days” events scheduled for May 18-20, 2026, in Lund and Stockholm, as announced in a university release.

Upon learning of his selection, Ramanathan expressed his gratitude, stating he was “speechless and humbled.” He emphasized the significance of the award, particularly as it recognizes climate research during a time when the subject has become increasingly contentious. “This prize, since it is given by the same science academy that gives the Nobel Prize, is an overwhelming confirmation that climate science is based on fundamental scientific principles backed by impeccable observations,” said Ramanathan, who serves as a distinguished professor emeritus of atmospheric and climate sciences at Scripps Oceanography.

The prize committee acknowledged Ramanathan’s substantial contributions to the field, particularly his research that has enhanced understanding of how aerosol particles and other climate pollutants affect the atmospheric energy balance and the Earth system. This knowledge is vital for both comprehending and addressing climate change.

Ilona Riipinen, a professor of atmospheric sciences at Stockholm University and a member of the Crafoord Prize Committee for Geosciences, remarked, “He has expanded our view of how humankind is affecting the atmosphere’s composition, the climate and air quality, and how these three interact.”

Born in 1944 in Chennai, India, Ramanathan earned his PhD in 1974 from the State University of New York. In 1975, he made a groundbreaking discovery regarding the super-greenhouse effect of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), demonstrating that these chemicals—commonly used in refrigeration and aerosol sprays—are approximately 10,000 times more effective than carbon dioxide at trapping thermal energy, or infrared radiation.

This pivotal finding highlighted the importance of atmospheric chemistry within the climate system and paved the way for the identification of additional “super pollutants,” including methane, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), and nitrous oxide.

In the 1980s, Ramanathan played a crucial role in NASA’s efforts to utilize satellites for measuring Earth’s energy budget, which involves the balance between solar energy reaching Earth and the heat that is emitted back into space. His research indicated that pollutants disrupt this energy balance, leading to climate changes. The findings revealed that greenhouse gases from human activities are increasingly trapping re-radiated energy in the atmosphere, contributing to global warming.

Ramanathan joined Scripps Oceanography in 1990, having already established himself as a leading figure in climate science. His research at Scripps focused on the impact of HFCs—replacements for CFCs—on both the ozone layer and climate, as well as various forms of atmospheric aerosols.

In a significant study conducted in the Indian Ocean, Ramanathan and his team discovered elevated levels of air pollution even in remote areas. They found that certain dark aerosols, such as soot particles, absorb radiation and contribute to significant atmospheric heating and reduced sunlight at the surface, thereby affecting the hydrological cycle.

Ramanathan’s research also identified soot particles as a major contributor to the melting of Himalayan glaciers. This work has had far-reaching implications, influencing international agreements aimed at reducing short-lived climate pollutants through initiatives like the Climate and Clean Air Coalition, led by the United Nations Environment Programme.

Throughout his career, Ramanathan has influenced a wide range of individuals, from policymakers to religious leaders. In 2004, he was appointed to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences by Pope John Paul II and has since served four popes, including Pope Leo. He was recognized as the science advisor to Pope Francis’ Holy See delegation at the landmark 2015 Paris climate summit and has also provided counsel to former California Governor Jerry Brown.

In addition to his extensive research, Ramanathan collaborated with UC San Diego Professor Fonna Forman to create “Bending the Curve,” an educational initiative aimed at promoting climate literacy and scalable solutions for individuals of all ages and educational backgrounds.

Ramanathan’s contributions to climate science have garnered widespread recognition. He has been elected to both the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. In 2013, he was named a UN Climate Champion, and in 2018, he shared the Tang Prize in Sustainable Development with fellow climate scientist James Hansen. His accolades also include the Blue Planet Prize, awarded in 2021, which is an international environmental honor.

Ramanathan’s groundbreaking work continues to shape the understanding of climate science and its implications for the future of our planet, reinforcing the urgent need for action against climate change.

According to The American Bazaar.

SEC Advances Civil Fraud Case Against Indian-American Gautam Adani

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has advanced its civil fraud lawsuit against Gautam Adani, paving the way for legal proceedings against the Indian billionaire.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken significant steps to advance its civil fraud case against Gautam Adani, the Indian billionaire and founder of the Adani Group. This development comes after resolving issues related to the formal serving of legal papers, which had previously stalled the case.

In a recent filing submitted to a federal court in Brooklyn, New York, the SEC announced that legal representatives for both Gautam Adani and his nephew, Sagar Adani, have agreed to accept the agency’s legal documents. This agreement eliminates the need for U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis to intervene in determining how the defendants should be served.

If the court approves this arrangement, the Adani family will have 90 days to respond to the SEC’s complaint. Their response may include a request to dismiss the case altogether. However, attorneys for both sides have remained tight-lipped on the matter. Gautam Adani’s lawyer, Robert Giuffra, and Sagar Adani’s counsel, Sean Hecker, declined to provide any comments.

The SEC initially filed charges against the Adanis in November 2024, alleging violations of U.S. securities laws. The accusations claim that the Adanis orchestrated a scheme involving the payment or offering of hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes to Indian government officials. These actions were purportedly intended to benefit Adani Green Energy, where both Gautam and Sagar Adani hold executive and board positions.

Both Gautam and Sagar Adani are based in India, and the SEC has previously indicated that it faced challenges in delivering legal notices to them. This has contributed to the lengthy timeline of the case.

In addition to the civil lawsuit, U.S. prosecutors initiated a parallel criminal case against the Adanis and several other individuals in November 2024. Since that time, there has been little public progress in the criminal matter, and the SEC’s civil case had largely remained on hold.

Gautam Adani, who is currently 63 years old, is recognized as India’s second-richest individual, with Forbes estimating his net worth at approximately $59 billion. The outcome of this legal battle could have significant implications for both his business empire and his personal fortune.

The SEC’s renewed efforts to advance the civil fraud case signal a pivotal moment in the ongoing scrutiny of the Adani Group and its operations. As the legal proceedings unfold, stakeholders and observers alike will be closely monitoring developments in this high-profile case.

For more details, refer to The American Bazaar.

Nalin Haley Criticizes Indian Government as ‘Cheap’ and Untrustworthy Ally

Nalin Haley, son of former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley, has ignited controversy by labeling the Indian government as “cheap” and “not a good ally” in a recent social media post.

Nalin Haley, the son of former South Carolina governor and Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley, has sparked significant debate with his recent comments regarding the Indian government’s relationship with the United States. His remarks, made on social media, question the reliability of India as a U.S. ally.

Positioning himself as a voice aligned with the MAGA movement, Haley asserted that India has not been a dependable partner for the United States. He criticized New Delhi for benefiting from the American economy by sending low-cost labor to the U.S., while simultaneously purchasing oil from Iran and military equipment from Russia.

In a post on X, Haley stated, “India has not been a good ‘ally’ to America. They send cheap labor to the U.S., buy cheap oil from Iran, and cheap weapons from Russia because they have a cheap government.” He further emphasized that the United States should reevaluate its relationships with several so-called “allies.”

Haley’s comments come at a time when India and the United States are nearing the completion of a trade agreement, following months of negotiations between the two nations. His statements have drawn attention, particularly as they coincide with a broader discussion about U.S.-India relations.

The controversy surrounding Haley’s remarks was fueled by a resurfaced video from 2023 featuring Vivek Ramaswamy, who advocated for decoupling the U.S. from China while strengthening ties with India. Ramaswamy clarified that his position was based on policy rather than personal connections to India. This video gained traction as some MAGA supporters criticized Ramaswamy over his campaign for Ohio governor, prompting Haley to express his opposition to Ramaswamy’s views.

In response to Haley’s comments, social media users quickly voiced their backlash. One user remarked, “This person has no idea about geopolitics…India is never an ally to anyone. Its foreign policy does not allow that. It is only a partner with other countries. The U.S. State Department fully understands that.”

Another user challenged Haley’s stance, stating, “Have you completely lost your mind in your hatred for Vivek? Your own mother, Nikki Haley, said the exact same thing you’re now attacking him for.” Many users also pointed out the contributions of Indian professionals to the U.S. economy, with one commenter noting, “The entire Silicon Valley is being run by such ‘cheap labor.’ And what do you even mean by ‘cheap’? American companies and hence AMERICA are benefiting from Indians working at low wages.”

Haley’s comments have also raised questions about his own heritage, given that his mother is the daughter of Indian immigrants. Earlier in December 2025, he expressed his opposition to the H-1B visa program, advocating for a complete ban and emphasizing his loyalty to America. He stated, “You can’t be stranded in your own country. The Indian government is only complaining because they want their remittance money. Delaying visas is good but not enough. We need a complete H-1B visa ban.”

In November 2025, Haley stirred further controversy by suggesting that naturalized citizens should be barred from holding public office, arguing that such positions should be reserved for individuals born in the United States. He also criticized dual citizenship, calling it “stupid” and asserting that individuals should fully commit to being American or not at all.

As the debate continues, Nalin Haley’s comments reflect a growing tension in discussions about U.S.-India relations and the complexities of immigration policy. His remarks have not only drawn criticism but have also sparked a broader conversation about the nature of alliances and partnerships in the global landscape.

According to The American Bazaar, the fallout from Haley’s statements demonstrates the contentious nature of political discourse surrounding immigration and international relations.

Madras High Court Overturns CBFC Clearance for ‘Jana Nayagan’ Film

The Madras High Court has set aside the CBFC’s clearance order for the Tamil film ‘Jana Nayagan,’ remanding the case for a fresh hearing, which delays the film’s release.

The Madras High Court has overturned a previous order that mandated the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to issue a U/A certificate for the Tamil film ‘Jana Nayagan,’ featuring actor-politician Vijay. This significant legal development has resulted in the court remanding the case back to a single judge for a fresh and thorough hearing, effectively putting the film’s release on hold once again.

The ruling was delivered by a Division Bench led by Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan. The decision came in response to an appeal filed by the CBFC, which challenged a prior single-judge ruling that had ordered the immediate certification of the film.

In its observations, the Division Bench noted that the earlier ruling had been made without providing the CBFC adequate opportunity to file its counter-affidavit and present its full case. The judges emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and due process, particularly when statutory authorities like the CBFC are involved.

The court asserted that the single judge should not have delved into the merits of the certification dispute at that stage. It underscored the necessity for a detailed hearing before arriving at a final decision.

In its order, the Bench stated that the previous directive granting certification could not be upheld and mandated that the matter be reheard to ensure all parties have a fair chance to present their arguments.

A legal observer remarked, “This ruling reinforces the principle that courts must adhere to due process and allow statutory bodies adequate time to respond before issuing decisive orders.”

While setting aside the earlier ruling, the court granted the film’s producers the liberty to amend their legal petition. This allows them to specifically challenge the CBFC chairperson’s decision to refer the film to a Revising Committee.

This development means the producers can now broaden their legal arguments to question not only the delay in certification but also the procedural steps taken by the censor board, including whether the film was appropriately subjected to further review after an initial recommendation.

The decision paves the way for a renewed legal battle over the certification process, with the final outcome likely to impact both the film’s release timeline and broader industry practices.

‘Jana Nayagan’ is widely regarded as Vijay’s final film before his full-time entry into politics and has been at the center of a prolonged legal and regulatory dispute. The producers approached the court after the CBFC delayed or withheld certification, citing internal review procedures.

Initially, a single judge had ordered the board to grant certification immediately, prompting the CBFC to challenge the ruling on the grounds that statutory procedures had not been fully adhered to.

The appellate ruling resets the legal process, meaning the certification issue will be re-examined from scratch before the single judge.

With the certification order now overturned, the film’s release remains uncertain, potentially affecting distribution plans, marketing schedules, and audience anticipation.

Industry insiders have noted that the verdict highlights the complex legal environment surrounding film certification in India, where creative freedom, regulatory oversight, and judicial intervention often intersect.

A senior film trade analyst commented, “This case underscores the growing importance of legal preparedness in film production. Certification disputes can significantly impact release timelines and commercial prospects.”

The ruling has broader implications for how certification disputes are managed. The court’s emphasis on procedural correctness reinforces the authority of statutory bodies while also affirming that their decisions can be subject to judicial review.

Legal experts suggest that the judgment may influence future cases involving film certification, particularly those concerning transparency, procedural fairness, and the rights of filmmakers.

A constitutional law expert noted, “The ruling strikes a balance between judicial oversight and respect for statutory processes, which is essential in regulatory matters.”

The case will now return to the single-judge bench, where a fresh hearing will determine whether ‘Jana Nayagan’ will receive certification, require modifications, or face further regulatory hurdles.

Until a final ruling is issued, the film cannot be legally released, leaving fans, producers, and industry stakeholders awaiting clarity on its future.

According to GlobalNetNews, the outcome of this case could have lasting effects on the film industry and its regulatory framework.

Nicki Minaj Pledges Up to $300,000 to Support Trump Accounts

Nicki Minaj has pledged up to $300,000 to support Trump Accounts, a new federal savings initiative aimed at enhancing financial literacy among children, sparking both praise and criticism.

Rap star Nicki Minaj made headlines on Wednesday by announcing her commitment to contribute between $150,000 and $300,000 to a new federal savings program known as Trump Accounts. Her vocal support for President Donald Trump at a high-profile summit in Washington, D.C., has drawn both admiration and sharp criticism.

Minaj, a Grammy-nominated artist recognized as one of hip-hop’s most influential figures, revealed her financial backing during an event that showcased the initiative’s potential impact. The gathering, held at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium, featured Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other Trump allies who were promoting the program.

Trump Accounts, officially designated as Section 530A under the One Big Bill Act, represent a new type of tax-advantaged investment account aimed at giving U.S. children a financial head start. Children born between January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028, will receive a one-time seed deposit of $1,000 from the U.S. Treasury, which will be invested in broad market index funds. Additionally, parents, employers, and others will have the opportunity to contribute up to $5,000 annually. The funds in these accounts are generally inaccessible until the child reaches 18, at which point the account converts to an individual retirement account.

Proponents of Trump Accounts argue that they could foster early financial planning and help reduce wealth disparities over time. However, experts caution that the actual outcomes will depend on long-term contributions and market performance. Several major financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, have already announced matching contributions for eligible employees’ children.

Minaj expressed her support for the initiative, emphasizing its potential to positively influence young people’s financial futures. In a post on X dated January 24, she stated, “Early financial literacy and financial support for our children will give them a major head start in life,” referring to the initiative as “the true meaning of paying it forward.”

During the summit, Minaj further aligned herself with Trump, declaring herself “probably the president’s No. 1 fan.” This statement underscored her enthusiastic endorsement of his leadership and policies, even as she acknowledged the criticism she has faced. She noted that the backlash regarding her political stance does not deter her support; rather, it motivates her, framing her involvement as a stand against what she described as efforts to “bully” the president.

Minaj’s support for Trump has elicited a range of reactions from her fan base and the general public. On social media, some fans have commended her for bringing attention to financial empowerment, while others have accused her of opportunism. Speculation has arisen that her support may be aimed at securing political favors, including potential pardons for her husband and brother.

Critics have also voiced their frustration, arguing that her embrace of a polarizing political figure contradicts the expectations many have for her as an artist. This debate highlights how Minaj’s engagement in public policy and partisan politics has blurred the lines between celebrity influence and civic engagement, particularly at a time when the nation is grappling with deep divisions over economic and social issues.

As the discussion surrounding Trump Accounts continues, Minaj’s involvement exemplifies the complex interplay between celebrity culture and political advocacy in contemporary society. According to The American Bazaar, her actions have sparked significant dialogue about the role of public figures in shaping policy and public opinion.

Priyanka Chopra to Join Shashi Tharoor at Harvard India Conference 2026

Priyanka Chopra Jonas will headline the 2026 Harvard India Conference, joining notable figures like Shashi Tharoor and Amitav Acharya to discuss India’s evolving global identity.

Global actor, producer, and humanitarian Priyanka Chopra Jonas is set to headline the 23rd edition of the Harvard University India Conference, scheduled for February 14 and 15, 2026. This event marks a significant moment for cultural diplomacy, global thought leadership, and India-focused academic dialogue.

The prestigious, student-led conference at Harvard will gather prominent voices from politics, academia, business, policy, and culture to explore India’s growing influence and evolving identity on the global stage. This year’s theme, “The India We Imagine,” aims to spark conversations about the values, ambitions, complexities, and transformative potential shaping India’s future.

As one of India’s most globally recognized cultural figures, Priyanka Chopra will serve as a keynote speaker, bringing star power and a cross-cultural perspective to this high-profile event. Beyond her cinematic achievements, Chopra is known for her advocacy, entrepreneurship, and humanitarian work, including her role as a UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador, where she champions causes such as child rights, education, gender equality, and global development.

Her participation at Harvard reflects her evolving identity as not only a global entertainer but also a thought leader influencing conversations about India’s global image, storytelling, representation, and soft power. An observer familiar with the conference’s planning noted, “Priyanka Chopra’s journey from Indian cinema to global entertainment symbolizes the modern India — ambitious, global, and culturally influential.”

Joining Chopra at the conference will be a distinguished roster of speakers, including Dr. Shashi Tharoor, a Member of Parliament, author, and former UN diplomat, and Amitav Acharya, a leading political scientist and international relations scholar. They will be accompanied by other eminent figures from public policy, academia, business leadership, and the arts, reinforcing the conference’s reputation as one of the most influential global platforms for India-focused discourse outside the country.

The sessions are expected to address a range of topics, including India’s geopolitical and diplomatic trajectory, economic transformation and innovation, democratic values and institutional resilience, cultural influence and global storytelling, climate policy, technology, and global cooperation, as well as India’s role in shaping the 21st-century world order.

The theme “The India We Imagine” is designed to encourage introspection and aspiration, prompting speakers and attendees to reflect on what India stands for today, how it is perceived globally, and the values that should guide its next chapter of growth. Organizers emphasize that the theme highlights India’s diversity, contradictions, creativity, and global responsibilities at a time when the nation’s international influence continues to expand.

A student organizer remarked, “This conference is not just about policy or economics — it’s about envisioning India’s future through multiple lenses, from culture to diplomacy to innovation.”

News of Priyanka Chopra’s participation has sparked enthusiastic reactions from fans worldwide, who have praised her communication skills and global stature. One fan expressed excitement, saying, “So excited to hear her speak on the global entertainment landscape!” Another added, “Waiting to see her amazing response — she kills people with her words, I love her.” The online response reflects Chopra’s enduring influence as both a cinematic icon and a global public figure.

Chopra continues to build a strong presence in global cinema, balancing Hollywood projects with her return to Indian films. She was recently seen in the American action-comedy “Heads of State,” starring alongside Idris Elba and John Cena, further solidifying her footprint in international entertainment.

Looking ahead, Chopra is set to appear in “The Bluff,” an action thriller directed by Frank E. Flowers, featuring an ensemble cast that includes Karl Urban, Ismael Cruz Córdova, Safia Oakley-Green, and Temuera Morrison. The film is scheduled to release on Prime Video on February 25, positioning Chopra in a bold, high-intensity action role.

In a move generating excitement among Indian fans, Chopra is making her return to Indian cinema after eight years with SS Rajamouli’s upcoming action-adventure film “Varanasi.” The film stars Mahesh Babu in the lead role, with Prithviraj Sukumaran as the antagonist and Chopra portraying Mandakini in an action-driven character. Currently under production, the film is expected to release around Sankranthi 2027, marking a significant milestone in Chopra’s return to Indian cinema. A film industry analyst noted, “Her return to Indian cinema is being viewed as both nostalgic and forward-looking — a bridge between Indian and global storytelling.”

Since its inception, the Harvard India Conference has become one of the most influential forums for examining India’s role in the world, attracting policymakers, global business leaders, diplomats, artists, scholars, and youth leaders. The 2026 edition continues this tradition, positioning India as a central voice in global debates on governance, culture, technology, and international relations. Priyanka Chopra’s participation further expands the conference’s reach into entertainment, cultural diplomacy, and global soft power narratives.

The presence of Priyanka Chopra, Shashi Tharoor, and Amitav Acharya underscores the multidimensional nature of India’s global rise — where culture, politics, diplomacy, and storytelling intersect. Observers anticipate that the conference will offer fresh insights into India’s future direction, a platform for youth-driven global dialogue, and a reflection on how India imagines itself — and how the world imagines India.

As Harvard University prepares to host the India Conference 2026, the inclusion of Priyanka Chopra Jonas as a headline speaker signals a growing recognition of India’s cultural ambassadors in shaping global perceptions. The event promises to be a landmark gathering, blending policy insight, academic rigor, and cultural influence while exploring the theme “The India We Imagine” through diverse and influential voices, according to GlobalNetNews.

EU Council President Displays OCI Card as India, EU Finalize Major Agreement

India and the European Union have finalized a landmark trade agreement, dubbed the “mother of all deals,” which is poised to reshape global commerce and strengthen political ties.

In a significant moment that intertwined global strategy with personal history, leaders from India and the European Union (EU) celebrated the conclusion of a landmark free trade agreement this week. Both sides have referred to the pact as the “mother of all deals.” This agreement, which has the potential to reshape trade flows affecting nearly one-third of the global economy, also produced an unexpected viral moment that captured widespread attention on social media.

During a summit held in New Delhi on Tuesday, the deal was finalized after years of stalled negotiations. The announcement drew international attention not only for its economic implications but also for the symbolism surrounding the agreement. The pact encompasses trade between India and the EU’s 27 member states, which together represent nearly 30% of global GDP and more than 1.8 billion people.

Negotiators have indicated that the agreement will significantly lower or eliminate tariffs on thousands of products, including automobiles, pharmaceuticals, textiles, machinery, and agricultural goods. Additionally, it includes provisions on services, digital trade, supply-chain resilience, and labor mobility—areas that have gained importance as governments seek alternatives to China-centric manufacturing networks.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi hailed the agreement as a “transformational moment,” asserting that it would expand export opportunities for Indian manufacturers and small businesses while attracting new European investment. “This is not just a trade deal,” Modi stated. “It is a strategic partnership for the future.”

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen echoed this sentiment, labeling the pact as “the mother of all deals” and emphasizing its geopolitical significance. European leaders have increasingly turned to India as a reliable partner amid economic uncertainty, energy shocks stemming from the war in Ukraine, and ongoing trade tensions with the United States.

Adding a personal touch to the summit, European Council President António Costa publicly displayed his Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) card during his remarks, eliciting smiles from the audience and a surge of attention online. Costa, whose father was born in Goa during Portuguese rule, noted that the moment reflected his personal connection to India and the growing closeness between the two partners.

This gesture quickly went viral on social media, highlighting the human side of diplomacy at a meeting otherwise dominated by technical negotiations and economic forecasts. The reaction from Washington was swift and closely monitored. A senior aide to President Donald Trump publicly acknowledged that India appeared to gain significant advantages from the deal, particularly in terms of expanded access to European markets. This comment underscored concerns among some U.S. policymakers that major trade flows are increasingly bypassing American-led frameworks.

Trade analysts suggest that the agreement could reduce India’s dependence on U.S. and Chinese markets while providing European companies with a stronger foothold in one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. If ratified by national parliaments, preliminary estimates indicate that the pact could double EU exports to India within a decade.

For India, the deal represents both economic ambition and diplomatic leverage. For Europe, it offers market access, strategic balance, and a long-term partner in a shifting global order—all sealed with a handshake that blended policy, history, and personal identity.

According to The American Bazaar, this agreement marks a pivotal moment in international trade relations, setting the stage for future collaborations between India and the EU.

Study Finds Increased Cancer Risk Linked to Alcohol Consumption Levels

Heavy and consistent alcohol consumption significantly increases the risk of colorectal cancer, according to a new study involving over 88,000 U.S. adults.

Heavy drinking over a lifetime is linked to an elevated risk of colorectal cancer, according to a study published in the journal *Cancer* by the American Cancer Society (ACS). The research analyzed two decades of data from more than 88,000 U.S. adults to assess how long-term alcohol consumption affects the likelihood of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) or precancerous colorectal adenomas, commonly known as polyps.

Participants in the study reported their average weekly intake of beer, wine, and liquor during four distinct age periods: 18 to 24, 25 to 39, 40 to 54, and 55 and older. The study categorized “heavy drinkers” as those consuming more than 14 drinks per week, while “moderate drinkers” were defined as those having between seven and 14 drinks weekly.

The observational research found a strong correlation between consistent heavy drinking throughout adulthood and an increased risk of colorectal cancer, particularly rectal cancer. Specifically, heavy lifetime drinking was associated with a 25% higher overall risk of CRC and nearly double the risk of rectal cancer. In contrast, moderate drinking was linked to a lower overall CRC risk. When compared to light drinkers, those who consistently engaged in heavy drinking had an approximately 91% higher risk of developing CRC.

Regarding colorectal adenomas, the study did not find a significant pattern linking higher current lifetime drinking to these precancerous polyps. However, former drinkers exhibited a notably lower risk of non-advanced adenomas compared to current light drinkers.

Out of the 88,092 participants, 1,679 were diagnosed with colorectal cancer during the study period. The authors acknowledged limitations in their research, noting that it was observational rather than based on a clinical trial, and relied on self-reported alcohol consumption.

The findings suggest that consistently heavy alcohol intake and higher average lifetime consumption may elevate CRC risk, while cessation of drinking could reduce the risk of adenomas. The researchers also indicated that the associations might vary depending on the tumor site.

The connection between alcohol consumption and cancer is not a new revelation. In a recent episode of *The Dr. Mark Hyman Show*, Dr. Mark Hyman, chief medical officer of Function Health in California, discussed how even moderate drinking can adversely affect nearly every organ system in the body. He attributed this to metabolic stress, inflammation, impaired detoxification, and hormonal disruptions caused by alcohol.

Dr. Hyman emphasized that drinking increases the risk of various cancers, metabolic dysfunction, disturbances in the gut microbiome, and mitochondrial toxins. He stated, “Bottom line, alcohol taxes every major system in your body, especially your liver, your brain, your gut, and your hormones.”

In a previous interview with Fox News Digital, Dr. Pinchieh Chiang, a clinician at Circle Medical in San Francisco, noted that taking extended breaks from alcohol can lead to profound health improvements. “Over months to a year, we see sustained improvements in blood pressure, liver function, and inflammation,” she said. “Those changes directly affect long-term heart disease and stroke risk.” Dr. Chiang added that reducing or eliminating alcohol consumption over time lowers the risk of several cancers, including breast and colorectal cancer.

As the research continues to unfold, it is clear that the implications of alcohol consumption on health, particularly regarding cancer risk, warrant further attention and consideration.

These findings underscore the importance of understanding the long-term effects of alcohol consumption on health and the potential benefits of moderation or abstinence. For those concerned about their drinking habits, consulting healthcare professionals can provide valuable insights and guidance.

For more information on this study and its implications, please refer to the original research published in *Cancer*.

According to Fox News Digital, the study highlights the critical need for awareness regarding alcohol consumption and its potential health risks.

Garcetti and Industry Leaders Discuss Next Phase of India-LA Relations

Former US Ambassador Eric Garcetti led a groundbreaking event at the Indian Consulate in Los Angeles, emphasizing the growing strategic and cultural ties between India and the city.

LOS ANGELES, CA – In a historic first event at the Consulate General of India located in the AON Center, former US Ambassador to India Eric Garcetti highlighted the expanding strategic and cultural ties between Los Angeles and India. The gathering, organized by India International Impact and the California India Chamber of Commerce, attracted a diverse audience of civic, business, and cultural leaders from the American mainstream.

During the event, Garcetti participated in a fireside chat with entrepreneur Gunjan Bagla, where he expressed his deep personal connection to India. “India taught us how to calculate how to worship and how to think,” Garcetti remarked, describing the country as a land of endless opportunity and framing the bilateral relationship as a triumph of bridges over brinkmanship.

Consul General of India in Los Angeles, K J Srinivasa, set the tone for the evening with the theme “LA and India Rising Skyward Together.” He emphasized that this theme reflects not just aspirations but a powerful reality, noting that India is on the brink of historic transformation. Srinivasa articulated that the growing partnership with Los Angeles is driven by strategic convergence rather than mere coincidence.

He pointed out the alignment between India’s “Make in India” initiative and Los Angeles’ advanced manufacturing capabilities, as well as the intersection of India’s digital public infrastructure with Silicon Beach’s technology ecosystem. Additionally, he highlighted shared clean energy priorities and the synergy between India’s expanding space ambitions and Los Angeles’ aerospace heritage.

“This is not a transactional relationship,” Srinivasa stated. “It is a co-creation partnership.” He noted that India’s recent opening of its space sector to private enterprise is fostering innovation in satellite launches, space applications, and deep technology startups, while Los Angeles continues to host companies that are shaping the future of aerospace, commercial spaceflight, and defense technologies.

The evening commenced with a captivating sarod performance by Stephen Day, who described himself as a “Western man with an Indian soul,” having studied under Ustad Amjad Ali Khan in India.

Ed Altman, a board member of India International Impact, reminisced about the long journey to establish a second Indian consulate in California, crediting Bagla’s engagement with Garcetti during his ambassadorship as pivotal to this achievement.

A panel discussion followed, focusing on contemporary India. Bobak Ferdowsi from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory discussed NISAR, a billion-dollar satellite collaboration between India and the United States that launched from India last July. This satellite is now providing crucial global data on weather, agriculture, natural disasters, and climate change.

Gary Ahwah, who has held senior roles at City of Hope, Molina Healthcare, and UnitedHealth, spoke about the advantages of offshore Indian teams in healthcare, emphasizing their ability to deliver speed and scale rather than merely low-cost labor.

Sonal Matai, President of Americas at Karl Storz, shared insights on innovations developed by the company’s Indian engineers, which are being integrated into medical devices expected to be utilized in leading hospitals such as Cedars-Sinai.

The second half of the evening was moderated by Dick Drobnick, Chairman Emeritus of the Asia Society of Southern California. In a candid discussion with Gene Seroka, Executive Director of the Port of Los Angeles, Seroka cautioned that tariffs imposed on India could hinder progress in the relationship. Drawing from his extensive travel experience in India during his tenure at American President Lines, he noted that a proposed merger between Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern railroads could significantly enhance trade between India and California. He praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s focus on ports and supply chains, stating that US port officials have learned valuable lessons from their Indian counterparts at Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust and Adani Ports, especially as India’s economy benefits from GST reforms and improved rail infrastructure.

A final panel looked ahead to the future of India-US relations. Brian MacMahon, CEO of Expert Dojo, predicted that India could generate as many as 1,800 unicorn startups in the coming years. Wajenda Chambeshi from the office of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass proposed the establishment of an India Hospitality House during the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics and called for the revival of the long-dormant sister city relationship between Los Angeles and Mumbai. Biotech executive Dave Whelan, founding CEO of BioScience LA, discussed the regulatory, reimbursement, and market entry challenges faced by Indian life sciences companies entering the US market.

The audience included notable figures such as Oscar winner Parag Havaldar and his wife Chandrani, Amgen Chief of Staff Jeff Chism, whose company is investing $250 million in a global capability center in Hyderabad, Japan House President Yuko Kaifu, and Glenn Osaki, special adviser to the president of USC.

As he gazed out over the Los Angeles skyline from the 45th floor, Garcetti reflected, “In every light, there is a story.” Consul General Srinivasa concluded the evening with a poetic invocation, stating that India and Los Angeles are not just rising together but are thriving because they are united, anchored in a shared purpose and a bold vision for the future.

According to India West, the event marked a significant step in strengthening ties between Los Angeles and India, paving the way for future collaborations.

ICE Deportations Spark Fear and Isolation in California’s Indian-American Sikh Community

In California, the Sikh community faces heightened fear and isolation due to increased ICE deportations, impacting their spiritual and social support systems.

Atop the rolling hills of East San José stands the largest Sikh temple in the United States, its white domes visible for miles. This gurdwara has served as a spiritual anchor and lifeline for tens of thousands of worshippers for decades.

However, over the past year, a growing sense of fear has permeated the community.

South Asians are often overlooked in discussions about undocumented immigrants, yet this year alone, 35,000 individuals from India were apprehended at the U.S. border, many of whom are Punjabi Sikhs. Some seek political refuge, while others arrive on temporary visas, taking low-wage jobs that leave them vulnerable to shifting immigration policies.

A January memo from the Department of Homeland Security expanded the operational reach of federal immigration agents, allowing them to conduct enforcement activities in previously protected “sensitive locations” such as hospitals, clinics, schools, and places of worship. This intensified ICE enforcement across California has left many Sikh immigrants questioning the safety of their gurdwaras.

Gurdwaras serve as crucial hubs for medical care, social services, and community support for Sikh Punjabi immigrants and their families. With Punjabi being the third most spoken language in several California counties, these spaces provide essential in-language resources and information.

Journalist Tanay Gokhale has spent the past year documenting how immigration enforcement affects Punjabi Sikh residents across California. He recently spoke with Sasha Khokha, host of The California Report Magazine, about the impact of rising ICE activity on daily life for Sikh immigrants.

Gokhale explained that the immigration crackdown has largely gone unnoticed within the broader narrative of the Indian diaspora, which is often perceived as affluent and well-educated. In reality, Indians represent the fifth-largest undocumented group in the United States, with many Sikhs from Punjab working in blue-collar jobs in agriculture and trucking.

After President Donald Trump took office in January 2025, the DHS memo allowed ICE officers to operate within places of worship, a significant shift from previous policy. The memo sparked rumors of ICE raids in gurdwaras nationwide, further fueling anxiety within the community.

As a result, many Sikhs began to question the safety of attending their gurdwaras. Narenda Singh Thandi, president of the West Sacramento gurdwara, expressed concern that immigration enforcement could disrupt the sanctity of their worship space. “We don’t want ICE in the temple,” he stated. “We don’t want people to go with their shoes on, with guns on, which is against our system.”

Gurdwaras are not only places of worship but also vital resource hubs for new immigrants, particularly those who speak Punjabi and may be unfamiliar with English. The decline in attendance due to fear of immigration enforcement has significant implications, as congregants are missing out on essential services that can impact their health and well-being.

Dr. Harpreet Singh Pannu, a Kaiser doctor who runs a free medical clinic at the San José gurdwara, noted that many older congregants rely on the familiarity and comfort of speaking Punjabi, which they often do not find in traditional healthcare settings. “We don’t make a difference in terms of whether they are documented or undocumented,” he said. “But there is reluctance because they are worried if they come here, they could end up in trouble.”

Simran Singh, who began visiting the Mesa Verde detention center in 2016, found that detainees often feel isolated and disconnected from their communities. During his visits, he discovered that many detainees lacked access to essential articles of faith, such as gutke, the holy prayer books of Sikhism.

Singh’s efforts to support Sikh detainees included bringing langar food, gutke, turban cloths, and Punjabi newspapers to help them stay connected to their culture and families. He emphasized the importance of maintaining their faith and cultural identity, even in detention.

Despite the challenges, Singh noted that detainees often share common struggles, such as anxiety about their futures and separation from their families. In these moments, faith becomes a powerful source of solace and connection.

As Singh observed, prayer beads, or malas, are used across various faiths, allowing detainees to bond over shared experiences and struggles, regardless of their backgrounds. “Neither of you are speaking English well, but now you have something to give to them, and that gesture goes a long way,” he said.

Despite the increasing number of South Asian detainees—now numbering around 65, with half being Sikhs—there remains a lack of advocacy and support for this population, even within the Indian diaspora. While individuals like Singh are stepping up to fill the gap, there is a pressing need for greater awareness and support for Sikh immigrants facing the realities of deportation and isolation.

The ongoing challenges faced by the Sikh community in California highlight the urgent need for broader conversations about immigration, support systems, and the importance of community resilience in the face of adversity, according to India Currents.

Cellphone Health Risks Under Investigation in New Government Study

A new study by the Department of Health and Human Services aims to investigate potential health risks associated with cellphone radiation and electromagnetic exposure.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has initiated a study to explore whether radiation emitted from cellphones and cell towers poses health risks to Americans. This investigation comes amid growing concerns about electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and its effects on human health.

According to HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon, the study is part of a broader strategy outlined in a report released last year by President Donald Trump’s MAHA Commission. The report emphasizes the need to address EMR exposure resulting from the widespread use of cellphones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, and wearable technology such as smartwatches.

In 2018, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) conducted a study that found “clear evidence” linking high exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) with cancer in male rats. Senior scientist John Bucher noted that while the study involved exposing rats and mice to RFR across their entire bodies, human exposure typically occurs in localized areas, particularly near the device being used. Bucher also pointed out that the levels and durations of exposure in their study were greater than what humans typically experience.

It is important to note that the NIH study did not examine the RFR associated with Wi-Fi or 5G networks. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. expressed his concerns about electromagnetic radiation, stating, “Electromagnetic radiation is a major health concern,” and he is “very concerned about it.”

In contrast, a spokesperson for the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA), which represents mobile carriers, asserted that there is no credible evidence linking wireless devices to health issues. The spokesperson emphasized that the consensus among the international scientific community and independent expert organizations is that radiofrequency energy from Wi-Fi, Bluetooth devices, mobile phones, and wireless infrastructure has not been shown to cause health problems.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has also stated on its website that research has not established a causal link between exposure to wireless technologies and adverse health effects.

In the United States, cellphones are required to comply with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations regarding radiofrequency (RF) exposure. The FCC employs a metric known as specific absorption rate (SAR) to measure how much RF energy the body absorbs. To be sold in the U.S., mobile phones and similar wireless devices must be tested and certified to ensure they do not exceed a limit of 1.6 W/kg (watts per kilogram), averaged over 1 gram of tissue.

The FCC maintains on its website that there is currently no scientific evidence establishing a definitive link between the use of wireless devices and cancer or other illnesses. However, the agency does provide recommendations for reducing exposure, such as limiting the time spent on wireless devices, using speakerphone or earpieces to minimize proximity to the head, and increasing the distance between devices and the body. Texting instead of talking is also encouraged when possible.

Fox News Digital reached out to HHS and NIH for further comments, as well as several major cellphone carriers, but did not receive immediate responses.

As this study progresses, it will be crucial to monitor its findings and implications for public health, especially as technology continues to evolve and the use of wireless devices becomes even more prevalent.

According to Fox News Digital, the ongoing research aims to fill knowledge gaps regarding the safety and efficacy of emerging technologies.

Gunfire Erupts Along LoC as Indian and Pakistani Troops Clash

Indian and Pakistani troops exchanged gunfire along the Line of Control in the Keran sector, amid heightened security measures and suspicions of infiltration.

Indian and Pakistani troops engaged in an exchange of fire in the Keran sector of north Kashmir’s Kupwara district on the night of January 20–21. The incident occurred as Indian forces were conducting a surveillance upgrade in the area.

Reports indicate that the exchange began when six personnel from the Rashtriya Rifles were installing advanced security cameras in Keran Bala to address existing security vulnerabilities. During this operation, Pakistani shooters reportedly fired two rounds using small arms, prompting a measured response from the Indian side.

Fortunately, there were no reported casualties on either side during the incident. In response to the gunfire, the Indian Army initiated cordon-and-search operations in the area, suspecting that the shooting may have been a diversion for infiltration attempts. Security measures have been intensified as winter progresses, reflecting ongoing concerns about potential incursions.

This situation remains fluid, and further developments are anticipated as both sides maintain heightened vigilance along the Line of Control.

According to The Sunday Guardian, the incident underscores the ongoing tensions in the region, particularly during the winter months when security operations are typically intensified.

2026: Key Year for the Future of the Indian Economy

India is poised for significant economic transformation in 2026, following a series of structural reforms that could redefine its position in the global economy.

As global economic discussions increasingly focus on Asia, India has emerged as a pivotal player. By the end of 2025, India officially surpassed Japan to become the world’s fourth-largest economy in nominal GDP terms, a milestone confirmed by assessments from NITI Aayog and the International Monetary Fund.

Economists have characterized India’s current phase as a rare “Goldilocks moment,” marked by robust growth and relatively stable inflation. However, while 2025 signifies a symbolic achievement, policy experts argue that 2026 could be even more consequential, potentially shaping India’s economic trajectory for the next decade.

“This is not just about rankings,” a senior economist noted. “2026 represents the point at which years of structural reforms begin translating into durable, global-scale outcomes.”

Between 2020 and 2022, India implemented a series of deep structural reforms encompassing trade policy, manufacturing incentives, infrastructure investment, and tariff rationalization. Analysts at the Reserve Bank of India suggest that such reforms typically require three to six years before their full macroeconomic impact becomes evident. This timeline places 2025–26 at the center of the payoff cycle.

“These reforms were never designed for instant results,” a former policymaker explained. “Their real value lies in compounding effects — exports, productivity, and competitiveness rising together.”

The transformation of India’s economy rests on three major pillars: expanding trade access through Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), building export-ready domestic manufacturing capacity, and shifting from protectionism to strategic tariff openness.

India’s recent acceleration in trade diplomacy has significantly reshaped its global engagement. A key milestone was the India–Australia Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement, which granted near-zero-duty access to most Indian tariff lines. Sectors such as textiles, leather, engineering goods, gems and jewellery, and processed food now enjoy preferential entry into a high-income market.

Equally significant is the India–UK Free Trade Agreement, widely viewed as a gateway to Europe. This deal lowers tariffs on industrial goods, expands access to IT and financial services, and reduces non-tariff barriers that have historically limited Indian firms.

Negotiations are also underway with the European Union, Gulf Cooperation Council, Canada, and several Latin American nations. If concluded by 2026, these agreements could provide India with preferential access to markets representing nearly 40% of global GDP.

“Trade agreements are no longer optional,” an export strategist stated. “They are the backbone of India’s next growth phase.”

However, trade access alone cannot drive exports without sufficient production capacity. To address this gap, India launched Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes across key sectors starting in 2020.

Industries such as electronics, electric vehicles, pharmaceuticals, solar modules, and capital goods are now approaching optimal production scale, with several sectors expected to reach maturity by 2026. Data trends tracked by the Reserve Bank of India and global agencies indicate that manufacturing is contributing an increasing share to the Index of Industrial Production.

“As plants stabilize and scale up, India’s integration into global value chains will deepen,” said an industry analyst. “This is when competitiveness becomes structural, not cyclical.”

Infrastructure reforms are quietly reinforcing these gains. Initiatives such as PM Gati Shakti, Dedicated Freight Corridors, and port modernization have begun to reduce logistics costs, which have long been considered a drag on India’s export competitiveness.

Improved port-to-factory connectivity and faster turnaround times are gradually aligning India with East Asian efficiency benchmarks.

“Infrastructure doesn’t make headlines like GDP numbers,” a logistics expert observed, “but it determines whether growth is sustainable.”

India’s tariff strategy has also evolved. After a phase of import substitution between 2017 and 2020, policymakers have shifted toward selective tariff liberalization since 2024, particularly with FTA partners, while still maintaining protection for sensitive sectors such as agriculture and dairy.

This approach signals what analysts describe as “re-globalization on India’s terms”: openness without vulnerability.

India’s rise coincides with the global China+1 strategy, as multinational corporations diversify their supply chains. India’s combination of scale, democratic stability, skilled labor, and domestic demand has positioned it as a preferred alternative for manufacturing and investment.

According to global agencies, India is expected to remain the fastest-growing major economy, even as growth moderates slightly to around 6.6% in 2026 amid global uncertainties.

Despite the optimism, economists caution that 2026 represents an opportunity — not a guarantee. Risks include global slowdowns, stalled trade negotiations, infrastructure bottlenecks, and quality constraints in export goods.

“The difference between potential and performance is execution,” a policy analyst stated. “Consistency matters now more than ambition.”

In conclusion, the year 2026 represents a historic inflection point for the Indian economy. With reforms aligning across trade, manufacturing, infrastructure, and tariffs, India has a rare chance to consolidate its position as a global economic powerhouse.

However, success will depend on sustained reform momentum, institutional capacity, and quality-driven growth. As one senior official put it, “2026 is not destiny — it’s a test.”

How India navigates that test may define its economic and geopolitical standing for a generation, according to Global Net News.

Jaishankar Meets Senator Steve Daines in Delhi to Discuss Indian-American Relations

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar and U.S. Senator Steve Daines engaged in discussions in New Delhi, focusing on the strategic significance of their bilateral relationship.

NEW DELHI – External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar met with U.S. Senator Steve Daines in the Indian capital on January 18. The meeting underscored the ongoing dialogue between the two nations regarding their bilateral relationship.

Following their discussions, Jaishankar took to social media to express that they had a “wide-ranging and open discussion on our bilateral relationship and its strategic significance.”

This meeting comes on the heels of a phone conversation on January 13 between Jaishankar and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. During that call, they reviewed key areas of cooperation, which included civil nuclear energy, trade negotiations, and regional security in the Indo-Pacific.

U.S. Ambassador to India, Sergio Gor, characterized the call as positive, noting that it set the stage for further discussions. “They discussed next steps regarding our bilateral trade negotiations, critical minerals, and a possible meeting next month,” Gor wrote on X.

The interactions between U.S. officials and Indian leaders highlight the importance both countries place on strengthening their partnership, particularly in areas of mutual interest such as trade and security.

As geopolitical dynamics continue to evolve, the dialogue between India and the United States remains crucial for addressing shared challenges and enhancing cooperation in various sectors.

According to IANS, these discussions reflect a commitment to fostering a robust bilateral relationship that addresses both countries’ strategic interests.

Balancing U.S. Pressure: A Key Test for India’s BRICS Leadership

India faces a significant challenge in balancing its foreign policy between the U.S. and BRICS, particularly as scrutiny from Washington increases on several member nations.

NEW DELHI — India’s foremost challenge in its international relations is navigating the delicate balance between its foreign policy priorities with the United States and its leadership role within BRICS. This balancing act is particularly critical as several BRICS member countries are under increasing scrutiny from Washington.

While India perceives BRICS as a platform to uphold a multilateral world order, other member nations, notably Russia and China, view it as a strategic tool to counterbalance U.S. influence. This divergence in perspectives complicates India’s position as it assumes the presidency of BRICS this year.

According to a report from the India Narrative, India’s current approach to U.S. relations, which is primarily driven by national interests, differs significantly from that of its BRICS counterparts. The report highlights that amid competing global interests, trade tensions, and the U.S. tariff imposition, India is poised to leverage its BRICS presidency to advocate for the interests of the Global South.

During its presidency, India aims to endorse the demands of developing nations for a more equitable representation in the global financial system and a stronger voice in international affairs. Historically, India has championed the aspirations of the marginalized nations, and this presidency offers an opportunity to reaffirm that commitment.

The report emphasizes that India will focus on strengthening Global South cooperation, promoting inclusive and sustainable growth, and fostering collaboration among BRICS members. This aligns with the principles outlined in the 2025 BRICS Rio de Janeiro Declaration, which advocates for the “5 Cs” for the Global South: consultation, cooperation, communication, creativity, and capacity building.

India’s presidency will also prioritize the promotion of multilateralism and the reform of global governance structures to create a more just, equitable, and effective international system. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has underscored the importance of collaboration with diverse partners, highlighting initiatives such as India’s G20 presidency and various development partnerships.

Modi has referred to BRICS as a significant asset for India, enhancing confidence in promoting diversity and multipolarity on the global stage. He views the platform as instrumental in navigating the current geopolitical pressures.

However, the major challenge facing India’s BRICS presidency will be managing U.S. pressure and its ripple effects within the bloc. The U.S. has previously imposed a 50 percent tariff on both India and Brazil, the highest among BRICS nations, which has sparked grievances within the group.

Despite these tensions, India has opted for a non-confrontational approach with Washington, contrasting with Brazil’s more aggressive stance, which included threats of retaliation against what it termed “tariff blackmail.” Instead, India advocates for BRICS members to address their trade imbalances with New Delhi, emphasizing a cooperative rather than confrontational strategy.

BRICS serves as an alternative for the non-Western world, providing developing countries with a platform that alleviates the need to rely on Western nations for economic assistance. This approach aligns with India’s longstanding policy of empowering weaker nations in international affairs.

As India navigates its presidency, the interplay between its relationships with the U.S. and BRICS will be closely watched, with implications for both its foreign policy and the broader geopolitical landscape.

According to India Narrative, India’s ability to balance these competing interests will be a crucial test of its leadership within BRICS.

Sergio Gor Visits Mumbai for First Time as Indian-American Leader

Sergio Gor, the new American Ambassador to India, embarked on his inaugural visit to Mumbai on January 16, emphasizing the importance of the U.S.-India partnership.

NEW DELHI – Sergio Gor, the newly appointed American Ambassador to India, made his first trip to Mumbai on January 16, visiting the U.S. Consulate in the city.

“Excited to kick off my first visit to Mumbai with a visit to our Consulate! Our dedicated team is working hard to bolster the U.S.-India partnership,” Gor shared in a post.

Prior to his visit to Mumbai, Gor presented his credentials to President Droupadi Murmu during a ceremony at Rashtrapati Bhavan on January 14.

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor characterized Gor’s arrival as a significant opportunity to reset the relationship between New Delhi and Washington. He suggested that the American diplomat should act as a “chief restructuring officer” to navigate tariff disputes, market access challenges, and geopolitical differences while leveraging shared democratic values to rebuild trust.

Tharoor highlighted Gor’s close ties to former President Donald Trump, arguing that this connection provides India with a unique chance to mend ties that have been strained by various issues, including tariffs and trade disputes.

In his remarks, Tharoor framed Gor’s role as one that goes beyond traditional diplomacy. He emphasized the need for Gor to not only manage existing relations but also to actively restructure them, shifting from punitive measures to a more collaborative partnership. Gor’s direct access to Trump is viewed as a significant advantage, allowing him to bypass bureaucratic hurdles and achieve swift progress.

As Gor embarks on his diplomatic mission, the focus will be on strengthening the U.S.-India partnership and addressing the complexities that have characterized the bilateral relationship in recent years, according to IANS.

Armed Kurdish Fighters Attempt to Breach Iran Border Amid Protests

Armed Kurdish fighters have attempted to breach the Iran-Iraq border amid ongoing protests in Iran, raising concerns about regional instability, according to reports.

Turkey’s intelligence agency, MIT, has alerted Iran’s Revolutionary Guard about Kurdish fighters attempting to cross the Iran-Iraq border during a period of significant unrest in Iran. This development has heightened fears that the turmoil within Iran could attract foreign militants, potentially destabilizing the broader region.

Reports indicate that armed Kurdish separatist groups have made recent attempts to enter Iran from Iraq, coinciding with a government crackdown on nationwide protests against the Iranian regime. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is leading the government’s response to these protests, which have been marked by widespread dissent.

The Tasnim News Agency has reported that militia groups operating in Iraq have crossed into western and northwestern Iran. This situation has raised alarms among Iranian officials, who claim that the Kurdish fighters are trying to exploit the ongoing unrest to further destabilize the country.

According to Reuters, three sources, including a senior Iranian official, confirmed that Turkey’s MIT warned the IRGC about the Kurdish fighters’ movements. Following the attempted border crossing, clashes reportedly broke out, with Iranian officials accusing the fighters of trying to take advantage of the chaotic situation.

The Council on Foreign Relations estimates that approximately 30 million Kurds reside in the Middle East, primarily in Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. This demographic reality adds complexity to the regional dynamics, especially as Turkey has designated Kurdish militant groups in northern Iraq as terrorist organizations and has conducted military operations against them.

In a notable development, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) announced in 2025 its intention to disarm and conclude its long-standing conflict with Turkey. However, tensions remain high, and Turkey’s military continues to target PKK bases in Iraq.

Amid these tensions, Iranian authorities have alleged that the Kurdish fighters involved in the recent border attempts were dispatched from Iraq and Turkey. The Iranian regime has reportedly requested both governments to halt any transfer of fighters or weapons into Iran.

The crackdown on protests in Iran has resulted in a rising death toll, which has reached at least 2,571, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency. In light of the escalating violence, former President Donald Trump stated that he had been informed that the killings had ceased and expressed skepticism about any plans for large-scale executions. When asked about his sources, Trump referred to them as “very important sources on the other side.”

In a related development, Iran closed its airspace to most flights on Wednesday, with the closure lasting just over two hours, as reported by flight-tracking website Flightradar24.

This series of events underscores the precarious situation in Iran and the potential for regional instability as various factions seek to exploit the ongoing unrest. The international community is closely monitoring the situation, as the implications of these developments could extend far beyond Iran’s borders.

As tensions continue to rise, the actions of Kurdish fighters and the responses from both Iran and Turkey will be critical in shaping the future of the region, according to Reuters.

BioMarin Appoints Indian-American Arpit Davé as Chief Digital Officer

BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. has appointed Arpit Davé as its new Chief Digital and Information Officer, tasked with enhancing the company’s technology strategy and digital transformation efforts.

BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., a prominent global biotechnology firm specializing in rare diseases, has announced the appointment of Arpit Davé as Executive Vice President and Chief Digital and Information Officer. This newly created position underscores the company’s commitment to advancing its enterprise technology strategy.

In his role, Davé will focus on reimagining and executing BioMarin’s technology initiatives, data science, and digital transformation efforts. His leadership is expected to create significant value for patients, employees, and shareholders, as stated by the San Rafael, California-based company.

With over 20 years of experience in information technology and artificial intelligence (AI) within the biopharmaceutical sector, Davé is recognized as a proven leader. His career has been marked by a strong track record of driving patient-centered organizations toward measurable business growth and profitability.

Before joining BioMarin, Davé served as a technology executive at Amgen, Inc. for the past seven and a half years. In his most recent roles there, he led teams focused on digital transformation through AI and innovative digital technologies, positioning the company to remain competitive in an evolving landscape.

Davé’s previous experience includes leadership roles at Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck, where he concentrated on CIO leadership, data science, and research and development.

He holds a Master of Science in Industrial Engineering from the University of Texas and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Sardar Patel University in Gujarat, India.

“Arpit is a visionary thinker and talented leader who brings to this role a deep understanding of the biopharmaceutical industry and a track record of using technology and AI to deliver for patients and the business,” said Alexander Hardy, President and Chief Executive Officer of BioMarin.

Hardy emphasized that Davé will be responsible for building a strategic vision and roadmap, deploying technologies that will enhance and differentiate BioMarin’s operations across various sectors, including research and development, manufacturing, and commercial organizations.

Expressing his enthusiasm for the new role, Davé stated, “I have long admired BioMarin’s dedication to people living with rare diseases, and I am excited to work as part of this team to create undeniable value for patients, employees, and shareholders.”

He further added, “I am honored to join BioMarin at this pivotal moment where the convergence of biology, data, and AI offers unprecedented potential; my focus will be on empowering our world-class teams and driving innovation to translate these capabilities into faster insights and the accelerated delivery of life-changing therapies to the patients who depend on us.”

Founded in 1997, BioMarin has established a strong reputation for innovation, boasting eight commercial therapies and a robust clinical and preclinical pipeline, according to the company’s release.

This strategic appointment reflects BioMarin’s ongoing commitment to leveraging technology and data to enhance its operations and improve patient outcomes.

According to The American Bazaar, Davé’s leadership is expected to play a crucial role in the company’s future endeavors.

Mamdani Appoints Lekha Sunder as Indian-American Communications Staff Member

Mayor Zohran Mamdani has appointed Lekha Sunder as New York’s Deputy Communications Director, focusing on messaging and communications strategy for the city government.

NEW YORK, NY – City Hall has announced that Mayor Zohran Mamdani has appointed Lekha Sunder as New York’s Deputy Communications Director. In this role, Sunder will be responsible for shaping messaging and coordinating communications strategy across the city government.

Sunder joined Mamdani’s primary campaign in February, where she played a pivotal role in expanding the campaign’s reach through traditional, digital, and earned media. Her efforts significantly strengthened the campaign’s media presence and helped align its messaging as it gained traction among voters.

Before her work with the Mamdani campaign, Sunder gained valuable experience in communications while working for Vice President Kamala Harris. She was involved in Harris’ presidential campaign in Pennsylvania, where she further developed her skills in strategic messaging and public relations.

At just 26 years old, Sunder is a recent graduate of Yale University, where she majored in Global Affairs. During her time at Yale, she also contributed as a reporter for the Yale Daily News, which likely enhanced her understanding of media narratives and the importance of effective communication.

In her new position at City Hall, Sunder will report to Communications Director Anna Bahr, a veteran staffer with a background in working for Bernie Sanders. This collaboration is expected to bring a fresh perspective to the city’s communications efforts.

According to India West, Sunder’s appointment reflects a commitment to innovative communication strategies within the Mamdani administration.

General Motors Reports $7.6 Billion Loss in Electric Vehicle Business

General Motors is set to incur an additional $6 billion in charges related to its electric vehicle operations, bringing total losses to $7.6 billion amid a challenging market environment.

General Motors Co. is facing significant financial challenges in its electric vehicle (EV) business, announcing an additional $6 billion in charges linked to production cutbacks in its EV and battery operations. This decision comes as the automaker grapples with a weakening market for electric vehicles in the United States.

The latest announcement, made on Thursday, brings GM’s total writedowns related to its ambitious investment in battery-electric cars to $7.6 billion. This figure follows smaller charges disclosed in October, reflecting the ongoing financial fallout as GM reassesses its EV strategy.

Declining EV sales have been a major factor in GM’s decision to cut production. Contributing to this downturn are the expiration of federal incentives and a decrease in consumer demand. Fourth-quarter figures from 2025 indicated a notable drop in deliveries, prompting the company to adjust its output and product strategy accordingly. The recent charges also account for costs associated with idled production capacity, supply chain realignments, and other operational adjustments.

Industry analysts observe that GM’s write-downs are part of a larger trend affecting the U.S. auto sector, where manufacturers are struggling to scale EV production while maintaining financial performance. The electric vehicle industry is currently experiencing a slowdown after years of rapid growth, particularly in the United States, where federal incentives, such as the $7,500 EV tax credit, have recently expired. This reduction in subsidies has led to declining deliveries, forcing automakers, including GM, to modify production plans, delay model launches, and absorb significant financial charges.

Moreover, the market is witnessing increased competition from international manufacturers, particularly Chinese companies, which are offering EVs at lower prices and potentially capturing a larger share of the market. As a result, automakers are facing operational and financial challenges, with production cutbacks and idle factories becoming increasingly common. Investments in battery technology and next-generation EV platforms are also fraught with uncertainty regarding timing and returns.

Analysts highlight the difficulty of balancing investment with profitability in a market characterized by slowing consumer adoption, reduced incentives, and economic pressures such as inflation and rising interest rates. Structural issues further complicate growth in the EV sector, including limited charging infrastructure, regional policy shifts, and changing consumer preferences in the used-car market. Despite these challenges, the EV sector remains strategically important for long-term mobility trends.

The recent disclosure underscores the upheaval caused by previous federal policy changes, including moves by the Trump administration to eliminate federal support for electric vehicles. As consumers continue to favor gasoline-powered vehicles, GM and its competitors have invested billions in EVs over the past decade to comply with stringent environmental regulations and to align with their optimistic projections of consumer demand.

Even well-capitalized automakers are navigating significant uncertainty as they strive to balance long-term strategic goals with immediate financial pressures. Factors such as shifting consumer preferences, evolving regulatory requirements, and fluctuating economic conditions contribute to a highly dynamic environment that can swiftly alter projections and investment plans.

The path forward for electric vehicles is likely to be uneven, characterized by periods of rapid adoption followed by market slowdowns and necessary recalibrations. Ultimately, the industry’s success will hinge on its ability to adapt to changing demand, regulatory landscapes, and technological advancements while maintaining financial resilience in an unpredictable market, according to The American Bazaar.

Trump Accuses India of Reducing Russian Crude Imports to Satisfy Him

U.S. President Donald Trump recently claimed that India has reduced its imports of Russian crude oil to appease Washington, warning of potential tariffs if the trend continues.

U.S. President Donald Trump, during a press interaction on January 4, 2026, asserted that India has decreased its imports of Russian crude oil in recent months, primarily to appease the United States and facilitate a broader trade agreement between the two nations. His comments reflect the growing tensions between the U.S. and India, particularly as issues related to energy, sanctions, and tariffs become increasingly intertwined.

“They wanted to make me happy,” Trump stated, referring to India’s alleged decision to scale back its purchases from Moscow. He praised Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as “a very good man,” emphasizing that Modi understood Washington’s dissatisfaction with India’s ongoing Russian oil imports. “He knew I was unhappy, and it was important to make me happy. They do trade with us, and we can raise tariffs very quickly — and it would be bad for them,” Trump warned.

Trump further cautioned that additional tariffs could be swiftly imposed if India continues to buy oil from Russia, reinforcing his administration’s hardline stance on countries maintaining energy ties with Moscow.

Senator Lindsey Graham publicly supported Trump’s assertion, stating that India’s declining Russian oil imports were specifically mentioned by India’s Ambassador to the United States, Vinay Kwatra, during a meeting in December 2025.

“I was at the Indian Ambassador’s house about a month ago, and all he wanted to talk about was how India is buying less Russian oil,” Graham noted. He added that the ambassador urged him to relay this information to President Trump in hopes of securing relief from the 25% U.S. tariff imposed alongside reciprocal duties.

“This stuff works,” Graham remarked, suggesting that trade pressure has influenced India’s energy decisions.

Data indicates that India has indeed reduced its Russian oil imports, showing a sharp decline of approximately 38% in value and 31% in volume in October 2025 compared to the previous year. However, analysts emphasize that India had already begun diversifying its crude sources well before the U.S. tariffs were enacted.

Energy experts argue that India’s oil procurement strategy is influenced by a combination of factors, including price, supply security, refining compatibility, and long-term contracts, rather than solely by political pressure. They contend that the reduction in Russian crude reflects market dynamics and risk management rather than a unilateral policy shift aimed at appeasing Washington.

The controversy arises as U.S. lawmakers advocate for stricter sanctions on Russia’s energy revenues. Senator Graham, along with Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, is a leading sponsor of a bill proposing punitive tariffs of up to 500% on countries that continue to purchase Russian oil or uranium.

Both senators were part of a bipartisan U.S. Senate delegation hosted by Ambassador Kwatra at the Indian Embassy in Washington on December 2, 2025. This meeting underscored the increasing U.S. pressure on major economies to further isolate Moscow economically.

India’s External Affairs Ministry did not respond to requests for comment regarding Trump’s remarks. However, in previous statements, New Delhi has criticized unilateral sanctions as an example of “double standards,” highlighting that several Western nations, including the United States, continue indirect trade in Russian energy, uranium, and critical minerals.

Indian officials have consistently maintained that India’s energy policy is guided by national interests, affordability, and supply stability—especially given the country’s large and growing energy demand.

Trump has previously claimed that India promised to eliminate Russian oil imports entirely, a statement that Indian officials have never publicly confirmed. His latest comments suggest that energy trade has become a bargaining chip in broader negotiations concerning tariffs, market access, and bilateral trade agreements.

As Washington intensifies its tariff threats and sanctions rhetoric, this episode highlights the delicate balance in India–U.S. relations: a strong strategic alignment on many global issues, yet persistent friction when economic sovereignty and geopolitical pressures intersect.

Whether India will further reduce its reliance on Russian crude remains uncertain. However, it is evident that oil, tariffs, and diplomacy are now intricately linked, with implications that extend far beyond energy markets, according to Global Net News.

Aspen Neuroscience Appoints Indian-American Revati Shreeniwas as CMO

Revati Shreeniwas has been appointed Chief Medical Officer of Aspen Neuroscience to advance the company’s cell therapy for Parkinson’s disease, enhancing its commercial readiness.

Aspen Neuroscience, a clinical-stage biotechnology company, has announced the appointment of Revati Shreeniwas as Chief Medical Officer (CMO). Her role will focus on accelerating the late-stage development and commercial readiness of the company’s innovative cell therapy for Parkinson’s disease.

This leadership change is part of Aspen’s strategy to transition its programs from clinical trials to market with integrity and purpose. The San Diego-based company is pioneering autologous regenerative therapies aimed at addressing neurodegenerative diseases.

Dr. Shreeniwas brings a wealth of experience to her new position, having received her medical education from Armed Forces Medical College in Pune, India. She possesses extensive expertise in neuromuscular and central nervous system (CNS) diseases, orphan indications, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, as well as gene therapy.

With over 20 years of experience in the biopharma industry, Dr. Shreeniwas is a board-certified physician executive who has held multiple roles as CMO. She has a proven track record of advancing clinical programs from pre-Investigational New Drug (IND) applications through to registration, successfully navigating global regulatory pathways, and shaping clinical and medical strategies for venture-backed companies.

Throughout her career, she has designed and led more than 40 global clinical trials, including registrational studies. Her contributions have been pivotal in the approval and commercialization of several notable therapies, including Rytary for Parkinson’s disease, Sunosi for sleep disorders, Esbriet for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and Tracleer for pulmonary hypertension.

Expressing her enthusiasm for her new role, Dr. Shreeniwas stated, “Aspen’s autologous iPSC-derived approach is redefining what’s possible in neurodegenerative disease. I’m excited to help deliver a rigorous registrational program for Parkinson’s patients, partnering across clinical, regulatory, technical operations, and medical affairs.”

Before joining Aspen, Dr. Shreeniwas held senior clinical positions at several biopharmaceutical companies, including Cystetic Medicines, Excision BioTherapeutics, Bright Minds Biosciences, and Soleno Therapeutics. She has also held faculty appointments at prestigious institutions such as Columbia University and Stanford University.

Aspen’s investigational therapy, ANPD001, is recognized as the most advanced autologous cell therapy in the United States for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. The company’s personalized approach eliminates the need for immunosuppressive (IS) drugs, which are typically required to mitigate the body’s immune response against foreign cells. This innovative strategy aims to reduce IS-associated adverse events, eliminate IS drug-monitoring requirements, and facilitate dosing for patients who have contraindications to IS therapies.

ANPD001 has received Fast Track designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), highlighting its potential significance in treating Parkinson’s disease. The ASPIRO trial, which is the first multi-patient, multi-center clinical trial of an autologous cell therapy for this condition, is currently underway. It is evaluating the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of ANPD001 in levodopa-responsive patients aged 50 to 70. Primary endpoints are expected to be reported at 12 months, with long-term follow-up extending up to 15 years.

This strategic appointment of Dr. Shreeniwas is expected to significantly enhance Aspen Neuroscience’s efforts in bringing innovative solutions to patients suffering from Parkinson’s disease, according to The American Bazaar.

Pakistan Expands Lobbying Efforts in the U.S. Through Think Tanks

Pakistan has increased its lobbying and public relations efforts in the United States, as revealed by recent disclosures under the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

WASHINGTON, DC – Pakistan has intensified its lobbying and public relations activities in the United States, according to recent disclosures filed under the U.S. Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). These filings detail contracts and payments amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars involving the Pakistani government and organizations linked to the country.

The outreach efforts target various entities, including the U.S. Congress, the executive branch, think tanks, and media outlets. One notable filing indicates that the Islamabad Policy Research Institute, a think tank affiliated with Pakistan’s National Security Division, allocated $900,000 for lobbying and public policy outreach in the United States. The disclosure specifies that Hyperfocal Communications LLC was registered as a subcontractor to Team Eagle Consulting LLC to carry out this work, which aims to enhance U.S.-Pakistan relations.

Another significant filing reveals that the Embassy of Pakistan in Washington entered into a contract with Ervin Graves Strategy Group LLC, effective October 1, 2025. This agreement stipulates a monthly payment of $25,000 for an initial three-month term. The planned activities include outreach to members of Congress and executive branch officials, as well as engagement with policy groups and think tanks. The scope of work covers various topics, including regional stability, economic development, democratic reform, trade promotion, tourism, and Pakistan’s potential in rare-earth minerals.

In addition, separate filings indicate that Javelin Advisors LLC was registered in April to represent Pakistan under a formal consulting agreement dated April 24. Javelin disclosed a monthly fee of $50,000 for its services, which involve communicating Pakistan’s positions on regional and global issues to the U.S. executive branch, Congress, and the public. Key issues include the Jammu and Kashmir dispute and Pakistan-India relations.

The disclosures are expected to be closely monitored in India, especially regarding lobbying activities that aim to communicate Pakistan’s stance on the Jammu and Kashmir issue and its relations with India. The filings also reference a framework document circulated in May that outlines proposed cooperation between Pakistan and the United States on rare earth minerals and critical metals. This document describes potential collaboration in exploration, mining, processing, and integration into global supply chains, with an indicative commercial value of up to $1 trillion.

Furthermore, the Embassy of Pakistan hired Qorvis Holding Inc. in May for public relations services. The disclosure lists media outreach and narrative development among the activities planned under this contract. Under U.S. law, foreign governments and related entities must publicly disclose their lobbying and public relations arrangements. These filings serve as records of contracts, activities, and payments made on their behalf.

As Pakistan continues to expand its lobbying footprint in the United States, the implications of these efforts will likely resonate across geopolitical landscapes, particularly in South Asia.

According to IANS.

Dominica Agrees to Accept U.S. Asylum Seekers Amid Deportation Expansion

The U.S. has reached an agreement with Dominica to potentially transfer asylum seekers to the Caribbean nation, following similar arrangements with Belize and Paraguay.

The United States has reportedly reached an agreement with the Commonwealth of Dominica that may allow for the transfer of certain asylum seekers arriving at the U.S. border to the Caribbean nation. This development follows similar pacts established with Belize and Paraguay.

Dominica’s Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit described the agreement as “one of the primary areas of collaboration” between the two governments. This comes in the wake of recent U.S. entry restrictions imposed on Dominican nationals. Skerrit noted that he has been engaged in ongoing discussions with U.S. officials since the White House announced partial visa limitations on December 16. However, he did not disclose specific details regarding the number of asylum seekers that could be sent to Dominica or when such transfers might commence.

In his remarks, Skerrit emphasized the importance of ensuring that Dominica does not receive individuals who could pose a threat to public safety. He stated that his discussions with U.S. authorities have included “careful deliberations of the need to avoid receiving violent individuals or individuals who will compromise the security of Dominica.”

The government of Dominica continues to address the broader context of U.S. travel restrictions. It has expressed its commitment to engaging with the United States Embassy in Bridgetown and the State Department in Washington in an effort to reverse the decision to impose partial travel restrictions on Dominican nationals, which are set to take effect on January 1, 2026.

In a clarification, the government noted that U.S. authorities have indicated that Dominican nationals who hold valid U.S. visas—including those for tourism, business, and education—will still be able to travel to the U.S. and its territories as per standard immigration laws. This announcement reassures that lawful travel will continue under existing regulations.

According to reports, the agreement with Dominica aligns with broader U.S. efforts under President Donald Trump’s administration to encourage other nations to share the responsibility for handling asylum seekers.

However, some members of Dominica’s political opposition are expressing concerns and seeking clarity on the agreement. Thomson Fontaine, the leader of the main opposition party, stated that “the prime minister still has not told the Dominican public what exactly he has agreed to, in terms of the numbers of persons that are going to come to Dominica, where will they be housed, how will they be taken care of.”

With a population of approximately 72,000, there are growing concerns about whether Dominica has adequate resources to accommodate an influx of asylum seekers. Fontaine’s remarks reflect a broader unease among the public regarding the implications of this agreement.

While discussions continue, officials have yet to provide detailed information about the timeline for the implementation of this plan or how it will be executed.

According to The Associated Press, the situation remains fluid as both governments navigate the complexities of this agreement.

US-Venezuela Crisis: Implications for India’s Energy and Global Strategy

The recent U.S. military intervention in Venezuela has significant implications for India’s energy strategy and its position in the global geopolitical landscape.

As the United States executed a military operation in Venezuela earlier this month, capturing President Nicolás Maduro, Indian officials and business leaders are closely monitoring the unfolding situation from nearly 8,000 miles away.

The operation, dubbed “Operation Absolute Resolve,” commenced on January 3 and involved over 150 aircraft targeting Venezuelan installations. The raid culminated in Maduro’s capture and subsequent transfer to New York, where he faces charges related to narcoterrorism. This unprecedented military action has ignited a global discourse on issues of sovereignty, international law, and the shifting dynamics of power within global energy markets.

In response to these developments, India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) issued a carefully crafted statement expressing “deep concern” regarding the crisis. The ministry called for all parties involved to engage in peaceful dialogue to stabilize the region. Notably, New Delhi refrained from directly condemning the U.S. actions, instead reaffirming its commitment to the “well-being and safety of the people of Venezuela.”

The geopolitical ramifications of the U.S. intervention extend well beyond South America. Analysts suggest that this move has significantly undermined China’s influence in Venezuela, a nation where Beijing has invested billions as part of a strategic partnership. In reaction, China condemned the U.S. military action, labeling it a violation of international law and emphasizing the necessity of upholding the security of sovereign nations.

Some international observers are drawing connections between the dramatic events in Venezuela and broader strategic tensions involving China, particularly concerning Taiwan. While experts believe that the U.S. intervention is unlikely to provoke a direct Chinese military response regarding Taiwan, it may embolden Beijing to assert its territorial claims more aggressively as part of a larger strategy to enhance its global influence.

For India, the immediate economic impact of the Venezuela crisis appears limited. A recent analysis of Indian energy markets indicated that India’s crude oil imports from Venezuela have plummeted to approximately 0.3 percent of total imports, primarily due to sanctions and a diversified sourcing strategy that includes Russia, the Middle East, and other regions. This minimal exposure has effectively shielded New Delhi from immediate supply disruptions.

However, the crisis raises critical strategic questions for India’s energy security and market stability. Should international sanctions on Venezuela be lifted and political stability restored, India may find itself in a position to reconsider investments or re-engage in Venezuelan energy projects that were previously seized or suspended due to U.S. sanctions.

Economists caution that the ongoing turbulence could introduce short-term volatility in crude oil markets, which may subsequently influence inflation rates and the value of the Indian currency. Nonetheless, the structural impact on India’s economy remains limited for the time being.

As New Delhi navigates its position between global superpowers, the Venezuela crisis highlights the intricate relationship between geopolitics and energy markets in an increasingly unstable international environment. The situation serves as a reminder of the complexities that nations face as they strive to protect their interests while engaging in the global arena.

According to American Bazaar, the unfolding crisis in Venezuela will continue to shape India’s energy strategy and its geopolitical maneuvering in the coming years.

Indian-American Ravi Bhalla Appointed to Lead Dundon’s Infrastructure Finance Division

Ravi Bhalla, the first Sikh mayor of Hoboken, New Jersey, will join Dundon Advisers LLC as Managing Director to lead the firm’s infrastructure finance business starting January 15.

Ravinder “Ravi” S. Bhalla, who made history as the first Sikh mayor of Hoboken, New Jersey, is set to join Dundon Advisers LLC on January 15 as Managing Director. In this role, he will lead the firm’s infrastructure finance business and will also be associated with its affiliates, Dundon Markets LLC and IslandDundon LLC.

At 52 years old, Bhalla transitions to this new position after completing his second and final term as mayor. He is also beginning his first term as a member of the New Jersey State Assembly, where he will represent Hoboken and parts of Jersey City.

Born and raised in New Jersey, Bhalla has been a prominent figure in local politics. He won the mayoral election in 2017 and was re-elected in 2021 without opposition. Prior to his tenure as mayor, he served for eight years on the Hoboken City Council.

Bhalla’s professional background includes experience as an attorney in private practice. He holds an AB from the University of California at Berkeley, an MSc from the London School of Economics, and a JD from Tulane University Law School.

Matthew Dundon, principal of Dundon, expressed enthusiasm about Bhalla’s appointment, stating, “We are excited to offer our private- and public-sector clients Ravi’s tremendous leadership in bringing critical infrastructure investments from concept to reality.” He emphasized that Bhalla’s experience will enhance the firm’s capabilities in both local and global infrastructure projects.

In his new role, Bhalla aims to leverage his extensive experience in infrastructure investment. He stated on LinkedIn, “I will be serving as a leader in the firm’s Infrastructure Finance business, advising institutional clients on financing strategies and capital solutions for large-scale infrastructure public and private projects.”

Bhalla elaborated on his responsibilities, noting that his role will involve navigating the intersection of capital markets, public finance, and infrastructure delivery. He aims to help organizations bring critical projects from concept to reality through thoughtful project feasibility reviews, analysis, structuring, and the alignment of public-private partnerships.

Throughout his career, Bhalla has focused on the entire lifecycle of infrastructure investment, from prioritization and design to funding strategy and execution. He highlighted a notable achievement during his time as mayor: Hoboken’s leadership in the Rebuild by Design – Hudson River (RBD-HR) initiative. This nationally recognized resilience project integrates engineering, green infrastructure, and community-centered design to protect the region from climate-related risks.

Bhalla emphasized that such efforts rely on strong policy and planning, as well as innovative climate finance approaches. He noted the importance of leveraging federal and state funding, forging partnerships with the private sector, and structuring funding mechanisms to deliver impactful projects at scale.

As Bhalla embarks on this new chapter with Dundon Advisers, he brings a wealth of experience and a commitment to advancing smart infrastructure investment, supported by capital markets and governmental collaboration.

According to The American Bazaar, Bhalla’s leadership is expected to significantly contribute to the firm’s mission of facilitating critical infrastructure projects.

Deadly Superbug Spreads Across U.S. Amid Growing Drug Resistance

A new review highlights the growing threat of the drug-resistant fungus Candida auris in U.S. hospitals, while researchers identify potential weaknesses that could lead to new treatments.

Researchers have uncovered a possible vulnerability in the deadly hospital superbug Candida auris (C. auris), which could pave the way for new treatments for this drug-resistant fungal infection. The findings come as the fungus continues to spread rapidly through U.S. hospitals and poses an increasing threat globally.

Described as a “superbug fungus,” C. auris has garnered attention from health officials due to its ability to resist human immune systems. A recent scientific review published by researchers from the Hackensack Meridian Center for Discovery and Innovation (CDI) emphasizes the urgent need for new strategies to combat this pathogen. The review was published in early December and reinforces previous warnings from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which has labeled C. auris an “urgent antimicrobial threat.” This designation marks the first time a fungal pathogen has received such a classification.

According to the CDC, approximately 7,000 cases of C. auris were reported across dozens of U.S. states in 2025, with the fungus identified in at least 60 countries worldwide. The review, conducted by Dr. Neeraj Chauhan of the Hackensack Meridian CDI, Dr. Anuradha Chowdhary from the University of Delhi’s Medical Mycology Unit, and Dr. Michail Lionakis, chief of the clinical mycology program at the National Institutes of Health, highlights the challenges in containing the pathogen. The researchers point out that outdated diagnostic methods and limited treatment options hinder effective responses to C. auris outbreaks.

The researchers stress the importance of developing “novel antifungal agents with broad-spectrum activity against human fungal pathogens,” as well as improving diagnostic tests and creating immune- and vaccine-based adjunct modalities for treating high-risk patients. They also advocate for increased awareness of fungal diseases and the establishment of better surveillance mechanisms, particularly in resource-limited countries. These advancements are crucial for improving outcomes for patients affected by opportunistic fungal infections.

C. auris was first identified in 2009 from a patient’s ear sample in Japan and has since spread to numerous countries, including the United States. Outbreaks of the fungus have led to the shutdown of some hospital intensive care units, underscoring its potential severity. The greatest risk from C. auris is posed to individuals who are critically ill, particularly those on ventilators or with compromised immune systems. Estimates suggest that about half of infected patients may die from the infection.

Unlike many other fungi, C. auris can survive on human skin and adhere to hospital surfaces and medical equipment, facilitating its spread in healthcare environments. Dr. Marc Siegel, a senior medical analyst at Fox News and clinical professor of medicine at NYU Langone, noted that the fungus is resistant to multiple antifungal drugs and often spreads through equipment used on immunocompromised patients, such as ventilators and catheters. Moreover, C. auris is frequently misdiagnosed, which can delay necessary treatment and infection control measures.

Dr. Siegel has previously highlighted the challenges posed by the symptoms of C. auris, which can include fever, chills, and body aches—symptoms that are common to many infections, leading to potential misdiagnoses. He indicated that research is ongoing to develop new treatments, as only four major classes of antifungal drugs are currently available, with C. auris demonstrating resistance to many of them. Although three new antifungal drugs have been approved or are in late-stage trials, researchers caution that drug development has struggled to keep pace with the fungus’s rapid evolution.

Despite these alarming findings, there is a glimmer of hope. In separate research published in December, scientists at the University of Exeter in England discovered a potential weakness in C. auris while studying the fungus in a living-host model. The research team found that during infection, the fungus activates specific genes to scavenge iron, a crucial nutrient for its survival. They believe that drugs targeting this process could halt infections or even allow for the repurposing of existing medications.

“We think our research may have revealed an Achilles’ heel in this lethal pathogen during active infection,” said Dr. Hugh Gifford, a clinical lecturer at the University of Exeter and co-author of the study. As researchers continue to explore the complexities of C. auris, health officials emphasize the importance of strict infection control measures, rapid detection, and sustained investment in new treatments.

Health experts want to reassure the public that C. auris primarily poses a threat to individuals with weakened immune systems and is not a danger to healthy individuals. As the situation evolves, ongoing research and vigilance will be essential in combating this formidable pathogen.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the CDI researchers and additional experts for further commentary on this pressing health issue. According to Fox News Digital, the fight against C. auris continues as researchers strive to develop effective treatments and preventive measures.

Kamala Harris Criticizes Trump Administration’s Actions Against Venezuela’s Maduro

Former Vice President Kamala Harris criticizes the Trump administration’s capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, calling the operation “unlawful” and “unwise,” while raising concerns about potential chaos and oil interests.

Former Vice President Kamala Harris condemned the Trump administration’s recent capture of Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro and his wife, labeling the operation as both “unlawful” and “unwise.” In a detailed post on X, Harris acknowledged Maduro’s reputation as a “brutal” and “illegitimate” leader but argued that the actions taken by President Donald Trump do not enhance the safety, strength, or affordability of America.

“Donald Trump’s actions in Venezuela do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable,” Harris stated. “That Maduro is a brutal, illegitimate dictator does not change the fact that this action was both unlawful and unwise. We’ve seen this movie before.” She expressed concern that interventions framed as efforts for regime change or securing oil resources often devolve into chaos, ultimately costing American families.

Harris’s remarks came shortly after the Trump administration confirmed that Maduro and his wife had been captured and transported out of Venezuela as part of “Operation Absolute Resolve.” The former vice president also accused the administration of being driven by oil interests rather than genuine efforts to combat drug trafficking or promote democracy.

“The American people do not want this, and they are tired of being lied to,” Harris asserted. “This is not about drugs or democracy. It is about oil and Donald Trump’s desire to play the regional strongman.” She criticized Trump for pardoning a convicted drug trafficker and sidelining Venezuela’s legitimate opposition while pursuing deals with Maduro’s associates.

Rumored as a potential Democratic contender for the 2028 presidential race, Harris further accused Trump of jeopardizing U.S. troops and destabilizing the region. “The President is putting troops at risk, spending billions, destabilizing a region, and offering no legal authority, no exit plan, and no benefit at home,” she said. “America needs leadership whose priorities are lowering costs for working families, enforcing the rule of law, strengthening alliances, and — most importantly — putting the American people first.”

Maduro and his wife were transported to the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn late Saturday after being processed by the DEA in Manhattan. Earlier in the day, Trump stated that the U.S. government would “run” Venezuela “until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition.”

Harris’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding her statements.

According to Fox News Digital, Harris’s comments reflect a growing concern among some political leaders about the implications of U.S. foreign policy in Venezuela and its potential impact on American interests.

H-1B Visa Delays Prompt Amazon to Adjust Policies for Indian Employees

Amazon has temporarily relaxed its return-to-office rules for employees stranded in India due to H-1B visa delays, allowing them to work remotely until early March.

Amazon has announced a temporary relaxation of its return-to-office policy for a select group of employees who are currently unable to return to the United States due to visa backlogs. This decision comes amid increasing scrutiny of U.S. immigration policies, particularly affecting H-1B visa holders.

According to an internal memo obtained by Business Insider, the company is permitting employees stuck in India because of visa delays to continue working remotely from their home country until early March. This adjustment provides short-term relief for those affected workers who had anticipated returning to the U.S. on schedule. Despite this exception, Amazon is continuing to enforce stricter in-office attendance requirements for its workforce.

The memo indicates that this temporary measure is specifically designed to address the disruptions caused by immigration issues and does not represent a broader change in Amazon’s remote work policy. Employees who qualify for this arrangement are, however, subject to significant restrictions. They are prohibited from writing code, participating in strategic decision-making, or engaging directly with customers during this period.

Amazon is not the only company grappling with the repercussions of visa delays. Many organizations across corporate America are adjusting to the rapid changes implemented during the Trump administration regarding the H-1B visa program. One of the most impactful changes has been the requirement for consular officers to scrutinize visa applicants’ social media activity before granting approval, which has significantly slowed processing times.

As a result, U.S. embassies and consulates in various countries have postponed visa appointments by several months. This situation has left many employees stranded abroad longer than anticipated, forcing employers to find creative solutions to maintain productivity.

The implications of these delays extend beyond Amazon. In recent weeks, major U.S. companies such as Google, Apple, and Microsoft have issued internal travel advisories. These advisories caution visa-holding employees against international travel, reflecting concerns that routine trips could lead to extended absences due to ongoing visa renewal and reentry delays.

Under Amazon’s standard policy, employees traveling overseas for visa renewals are allowed to work remotely for up to 20 business days. This is a limited exception to the company’s general requirement for employees to be in the office five days a week. However, the new guidance expands this allowance significantly.

According to the memo posted on Amazon’s internal HR portal on December 17, any employee who was in India as of December 13 and is awaiting a rescheduled visa appointment can continue to work remotely until March 2. This temporary extension highlights how immigration delays are compelling even the most office-centric companies to adapt their policies.

As the situation evolves, it remains to be seen how companies will continue to navigate the complexities of immigration and work policies in a changing landscape.

For further details, refer to Business Insider.

Cancer Drug Combination Shows Promise for Treatment-Resistant Patients

A new drug combination shows promise for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients resistant to standard therapies, offering hope for improved outcomes in this aggressive cancer.

Researchers at Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) have made a significant breakthrough in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a particularly aggressive form of leukemia that affects over 20,000 Americans each year. Their findings suggest that a novel drug combination could help patients who do not respond to traditional therapies.

The study involved analyzing samples from more than 300 AML patients, revealing that pairing venetoclax—a drug commonly used to treat leukemia—with palbociclib, which is typically used for breast cancer, produced stronger and more durable leukemia-fighting effects than venetoclax alone.

Jeffrey Tyner, a professor of cell, developmental, and cancer biology at OHSU’s School of Medicine and the Knight Cancer Institute, emphasized the significance of the findings. “The data show that this drug regimen may be especially effective in patients whose tumors exhibit features that cause resistance to the current standard of care, frontline therapies,” he stated.

The research team initially explored a wide range of drug combinations without any predetermined favorites. Among all the pairings tested, including existing standard-of-care regimens, the combination of venetoclax and palbociclib emerged as the most promising.

Melissa Stewart, a research assistant professor at OHSU and the lead author of the study, noted, “That really motivated us to dig deeper into why it works so well—and why it appears to overcome resistance seen with current therapy.” The study revealed that AML cells exposed solely to venetoclax could adapt by increasing protein production, allowing them to survive. However, the addition of palbociclib blocked this adaptation, significantly impeding the cancer cells’ ability to thrive.

In preclinical models, the results were striking. While venetoclax alone did not extend survival, the combination treatment resulted in the majority of mice living for 11 to 12 months, with one mouse still alive at the conclusion of the study.

Tyner explained that the study sheds light on the biological mechanisms behind the improved outcomes associated with this new drug combination, paving the way for future clinical trials involving real patients. “Unfortunately, almost everyone will eventually have drug resistance,” he remarked, highlighting the ongoing challenges in treating AML.

Despite the promising initial response rates and improved quality of life reported with the current drug regimen, the five-year survival rate for AML remains low, estimated at only 25% to 40%. “We have a lot of work to do,” Tyner added.

While the data strongly suggest that this new drug combination should be tested in clinical trials, the research team acknowledges that they currently lack data on its clinical activity in AML patients, aside from some anecdotal reports. “So, the biggest limitation is also our desired next step—of testing this new drug combination in clinical trials,” Tyner concluded.

As the medical community continues to seek innovative solutions for AML, this research offers a glimmer of hope for patients facing treatment-resistant forms of the disease.

For further details, refer to the original report from Fox News Digital.

Satya Nadella Predicts 2026 Will Mark Significant Advancements in AI

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella predicts that 2026 will mark a significant transition for artificial intelligence, moving from experimentation to real-world applications.

SEATTLE, WA – Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has emphasized that 2026 will be a pivotal year for artificial intelligence (AI), signaling a shift from initial experimentation and excitement to broader, real-world adoption of the technology.

In a recent blog post, Nadella articulated that the AI industry is evolving beyond mere flashy demonstrations, moving towards a clearer distinction between “spectacle” and “substance.” This evolution aims to enhance understanding of where AI can truly deliver meaningful impact.

While acknowledging the rapid pace of AI development, Nadella noted that the practical application of these powerful systems has not kept pace. He described the current landscape as a phase of “model overhang,” where AI models are advancing faster than our ability to implement them effectively in daily life, business, and society.

“We are still in the opening miles of a marathon,” Nadella remarked, highlighting that despite remarkable progress, much about AI’s future remains uncertain.

He pointed out that many of today’s AI capabilities have yet to translate into tangible outcomes that enhance productivity, decision-making, or human well-being on a large scale. Reflecting on the early days of personal computing, Nadella referenced Steve Jobs’ famous analogy of computers as “bicycles for the mind,” tools designed to enhance human thought and work.

“This idea needs to evolve in the age of AI,” he stated, suggesting that rather than replacing human thinking, AI systems should be crafted to support and amplify it. He envisions AI as cognitive tools that empower individuals to achieve their goals more effectively.

Nadella further argued that the true value of AI does not lie in the power of a model itself, but rather in how individuals choose to utilize it. He urged a shift in the debate surrounding AI outputs, moving away from simplistic judgments of quality and instead focusing on how humans adapt to these new tools in their everyday interactions and decision-making processes.

The Microsoft chief also underscored the necessity for the AI industry to progress beyond merely developing advanced models. He emphasized the importance of constructing comprehensive systems around AI, which include software, workflows, and safeguards that enable the technology to be used reliably and responsibly.

Despite the rapid advancements in AI, Nadella acknowledged that current systems still exhibit rough edges and limitations that require careful management. As the industry prepares for the future, he remains optimistic about the potential of AI to transform various aspects of life, provided that the right frameworks and approaches are established.

According to IANS, Nadella’s insights reflect a broader understanding of the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead in the realm of artificial intelligence.

India’s Innovation Challenge: Bridging Ideas and Product Development

India’s innovation landscape faces significant challenges in transforming research breakthroughs into market-ready products, despite its wealth of talent and resources.

India is at a critical juncture in its economic and technological evolution. The nation is home to world-class scientific talent, esteemed institutions, and one of the fastest-growing startup ecosystems globally. However, despite this wealth of intellectual resources, India grapples with a persistent issue: the inability to convert research breakthroughs into scalable, market-ready products.

This disconnect, often referred to as the “valley of death” in innovation ecosystems, has become increasingly apparent as India aims to establish itself as a global manufacturing and technology hub. Experts suggest that the challenge lies not in a lack of ideas but in a significant misalignment between academia, industry, investors, and government.

India’s academic ecosystem primarily focuses on publishing research papers rather than developing products. Conversely, the industry seeks deployable solutions rather than early-stage prototypes. Investors typically engage only after commercial viability is established. This results in a fragmented pipeline where promising innovations often stall before they can reach the market.

The frustration within the industry is palpable. A founder of a high-tech Indian company expressed to Swarajya, “We have tried to work with lots of different IITs, and in most cases, there is no strong output that comes from these colleges.” Such sentiments reflect a broader structural issue rather than isolated failures.

Dr. Anurag Agrawal of Ashoka University bluntly articulates the challenge: “India has no dearth of bioscience talent, but translating research into real-world health solutions remains a major challenge.” He emphasizes the need to “back people, not just projects,” and to realign incentives toward outcomes that extend beyond academic achievements.

Innovation specialists often highlight a specific bottleneck: the transition from Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 3 to TRL 4, where a lab-tested concept must be validated in real-world conditions. According to innovation strategist Babu Mohanan, “India doesn’t suffer from a shortage of ideas — we suffer from a shortage of products.” He notes that many innovations “never make it beyond the lab door” because the ecosystem is not structured to support the costly, iterative, and risky process of commercialization.

At this critical stage, the convergence of engineering talent, manufacturing partners, regulatory clarity, and patient capital is essential. Unfortunately, in India, these elements rarely align simultaneously.

Despite these challenges, India has produced notable success stories, demonstrating that capability is not the issue, but rather coordination is. One frequently cited example is Prof. Ashok Jhunjhunwala’s work in the telecom sector, where his team successfully reduced telephone costs from ₹40,000 to ₹10,000 by prioritizing affordability alongside innovation. His philosophy of “putting economics before technology” became a cornerstone of India’s telecom revolution.

Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers at IIT Kanpur developed a functional ventilator in just 90 days. This project succeeded due to the convergence of urgency, institutional support, and cross-disciplinary collaboration.

A more structural example is the IIT Madras Research Park, which has completed over 900 joint industry-academia projects. It serves as a national benchmark for how universities can drive innovation when incentives and partnerships are intentionally aligned.

India’s innovation gap is also closely tied to chronic underinvestment. The country allocates only 0.7% of its GDP to research and development, significantly lower than global leaders like South Korea and the United States. Without sustained funding, scaling deep-tech infrastructure remains a formidable challenge.

Former NITI Aayog CEO Amitabh Kant has consistently argued that innovation must be recognized as a core driver of growth. “We have not yet fully leveraged our innovation potential,” he stated, advocating for stronger industry-academia linkages and catalytic public procurement to stimulate demand for indigenous technologies.

The paradox of India’s manufacturing sector reflects this contradiction. Entrepreneurs across industrial clusters in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka exhibit resilience and adaptability, yet many remain ensnared in low-value manufacturing. Innovation expert Yogesh Pandit describes this as a “low-value trap,” where firms compete on cost rather than capability—not due to a lack of ambition, but because of insufficient structured pathways to adopt or co-develop new technologies.

Historically, India has been a civilization of creators, from the Sindhu-Saraswati era to the Chola Empire, where Indian technologies and goods significantly influenced global trade. The contemporary challenge is not about rediscovering talent but about rebuilding systems that enable that talent to thrive.

India’s next leap in innovation will not stem from isolated breakthroughs. It will emerge from aligning incentives across academia, industry, and government; funding the entire lifecycle of innovation; and rewarding product creation rather than merely academic publication.

Experts broadly agree on several necessary reforms: reforming academic incentives to reward patents, prototypes, and industry collaboration; strengthening industry-academia linkages through research parks and shared labs; bridging the valley of death with dedicated TRL 3–7 funding; increasing R&D spending to 2% of GDP; and fostering a product-first culture that celebrates long-term innovation and risk-taking.

In conclusion, India’s innovation narrative is not one of failure but of untapped potential. The ideas and talent are present; what is lacking is alignment. With deliberate reform and sustained commitment, India can transition from a nation rich in ideas to one that consistently produces world-changing products, according to Global Net News.

Coping Strategies for Individuals Facing Gambling Disorders

Rohini, a first-generation Indian immigrant, seeks help as her husband Raghav struggles with a gambling disorder, highlighting the complexities of addiction and the importance of support and treatment.

Rohini, a 43-year-old first-generation Indian immigrant, moved to Las Vegas with her husband Raghav and their son Rahul five years ago. Raghav, an IT professional, has recently developed a troubling relationship with gambling, which has raised concerns for Rohini.

Over the past year, Raghav has increasingly spent time and money at local casinos. Although he has experienced occasional wins, they have been overshadowed by significant losses. He often reassures Rohini that he will win big next time, but his preoccupation with gambling has led him to make excuses for absences from work and to lie to her. Worried about the impact of Raghav’s behavior on their family, Rohini sought advice.

Dr. Sharma, a mental health expert, diagnosed Raghav with signs of compulsive gambling, also known as gambling disorder. This condition is characterized by a persistent urge to gamble despite negative consequences, such as financial loss and strained relationships. According to Dr. Sharma, approximately 0.5% of the adult population in the United States suffers from this disorder, which is classified as a behavioral addiction that can lead to severe impairment in various aspects of life.

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR) has redefined pathological gambling as “gambling disorder,” placing it within the Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders chapter. This change underscores the similarities between gambling addiction and substance abuse disorders.

When asked about the causes of this addiction, Dr. Sharma explained that gambling disorder arises from a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Stress, depression, domestic violence, substance use, financial instability, and impulsivity can all contribute to the development of this disorder. In Raghav’s case, living in Las Vegas, a city known for its casinos, may have exacerbated his gambling behavior. Additionally, studies have indicated a rise in online gambling disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic.

For treatment, Dr. Sharma recommended that Raghav reach out to a mental healthcare provider. He highlighted the National Problem Gambling Helpline (1-800-522-4700) as a confidential resource for support. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one effective approach, as it helps individuals identify and change unhealthy thought patterns and behaviors. Motivational interviewing (MI) can also be beneficial, fostering commitment and confidence in the recovery process.

Family therapy may be another avenue for Rohini and Raghav, as it can improve their relationship and communication. In some cases, a psychiatrist might prescribe medications to address coexisting mental health issues. Support groups, such as Gamblers Anonymous, which follows a 12-step program, can serve as valuable adjuncts to recovery. For severe cases, residential treatment options in structured environments may be necessary.

Dr. Sharma outlined several signs of recovery from gambling addiction. Research indicates that recovery often involves improved insight, empowerment, enhanced well-being, and reduced risk of relapse. Observable behavioral signs include a decrease in gambling frequency, better impulse control, and avoidance of high-risk situations. Emotionally, individuals may experience less preoccupation with gambling, improved mood, and increased self-awareness. Socially, recovery can lead to stronger relationships, greater financial stability, and enhanced coping strategies.

Preventing relapse is crucial, according to Dr. Sharma. He advised Rohini to remain vigilant about both internal and external triggers that may lead Raghav back to gambling. Keeping a journal to track his thoughts and feelings can be helpful. Raghav should also develop healthy coping mechanisms, such as engaging in hobbies, exercising, or pursuing creative activities. Building a supportive social network is essential, as is maintaining transparency about finances and establishing clear boundaries.

Removing access to gambling opportunities and having a relapse action plan in place are also critical steps in the recovery journey. Dr. Sharma emphasized that practices like yoga and meditation can support recovery by reducing stress and anxiety, improving emotional regulation, and fostering mindfulness.

For those seeking additional resources, Dr. Sharma recommended several websites, including the Cleveland Clinic’s information on gambling disorder, the Victoria State Government’s guide on regaining control over gambling, and the Mayo Clinic’s resources on compulsive gambling. Treatment recommendations can also be found on Mass.gov.

For further questions, individuals can reach out to Dr. Manoj Sharma at editor@indiacurrents.com.

This situation illustrates the complexities of gambling addiction and the importance of seeking help. With the right support and treatment, recovery is possible.

Hamas Confirms Deaths of Five Leaders, Including Key Spokesperson

Hamas has confirmed the deaths of five senior leaders, including its masked spokesperson, marking a significant setback for the militant organization amid ongoing conflict in Gaza.

Hamas has officially acknowledged the deaths of five senior leaders, representing one of the most substantial blows to the militant group since the onset of the Gaza war. The announcement was made by the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’s armed wing, in a statement released on Monday.

Among those confirmed dead is Mohammed al-Sinwar, the brother of former Hamas leader Yahya al-Sinwar. He was reportedly killed during Israeli military operations in Gaza. The Jerusalem Post noted that al-Sinwar had ascended to a prominent role within the organization and was considered a key figure in Hamas’s wartime command following the deaths of other top commanders. The Israeli military had previously stated in May that he was killed in an airstrike targeting a Hamas command center located beneath the European Hospital in Khan Younis.

While Hamas did not specify the exact date of al-Sinwar’s death, it did confirm that he had been killed earlier this year. The group also acknowledged the death of Abu Obeida, the long-time masked spokesman for the al-Qassam Brigades, who had become the public face of the group’s military wing during the ongoing conflict. According to Reuters, this announcement marked the first time Hamas revealed Abu Obeida’s real name: Hudhayfa Samir Abdullah al-Kahlout. Israeli statements indicated that he was killed in an Israeli strike on Gaza City in late August, and while Israel had previously announced his death, this was the first official confirmation from Hamas.

In addition to al-Sinwar and Abu Obeida, Hamas confirmed the deaths of Raed Saad, a high-ranking commander within the al-Qassam Brigades, and Mohammed Shabanah, the head of its Rafah Brigade. Saad was reported killed in a targeted strike after months of tracking his movements through Gaza’s tunnel network. Israeli security officials described him as one of the principal planners behind the October 7, 2023, attack, which resulted in approximately 1,200 fatalities and over 250 hostages taken. Hakam al-Issa, a veteran commander and one of the founders of the al-Qassam Brigades, was also confirmed dead; he was reported killed during airstrikes in Gaza earlier this year, specifically in the Sabra neighborhood of Gaza City.

The confirmations of these deaths come despite a ceasefire that took effect in October. Following a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, President Trump issued a warning regarding Hamas. He stated that the group must disarm soon or face severe consequences. “They’re going to be given a very short period of time to disarm,” Trump said, adding that the next phase of the Gaza peace plan could proceed swiftly if Hamas lays down its weapons.

This development underscores the ongoing volatility in the region and the significant challenges facing Hamas as it navigates the aftermath of these leadership losses.

According to The Jerusalem Post, the ramifications of these deaths could further destabilize Hamas’s command structure and influence in the ongoing conflict.

Andrew Branca Show Faces Backlash for Remarks on Indian-American Vivek Ramaswamy

Andrew Branca, host of “The Andrew Branca Show,” faces backlash for racially charged comments directed at Vivek Ramaswamy during a recent online tirade.

Racism appears to have reached new lows with Andrew Branca, the host of “The Andrew Branca Show,” as he recently launched a racially charged tirade against Vivek Ramaswamy.

Branca shared a video on Elon Musk’s platform, X, in which he criticized Ramaswamy for sitting barefoot during an interview. Accompanying the video, Branca made a series of derogatory remarks, questioning Ramaswamy’s cultural identity.

“How do you know that cultural Indian Vivek Ramaswamy is indeed CULTURALLY INDIAN? Because he DOES SHIT LIKE this BAREFOOT interview on camera,” Branca stated. He further claimed, “No cultural American would dress in business attire for a filmed interview, and then TAKE OFF HIS SHOES AND SOCKS TO BE BAREFOOT. These cultural Indians JUST CANNOT HELP THEMSELVES from behaving consistent with their INDIAN CULTURE.”

In his commentary, Branca also made insinuations about the size and shape of Ramaswamy’s feet, attempting to cast doubt on their normalcy.

Hosted by attorney Andrew Branca, “The Andrew Branca Show” focuses on political commentary and legal analysis. The program often emphasizes constitutional issues, contemporary political developments, and legal controversies, reflecting Branca’s stated values of supporting the U.S. Constitution, Western civilization, meritocracy, and family principles.

The show is closely associated with Branca’s broader Law of Self Defense community, where he utilizes his experience as a practicing attorney and legal instructor to explain complex legal and constitutional matters to a general audience.

Vivek Ramaswamy, an American entrepreneur, author, and political figure, is recognized for his contributions to biotechnology and his public commentary on corporate and political issues. Born in 1985 in Cincinnati, Ohio, Ramaswamy studied biology at Harvard University and later earned a law degree from Yale Law School. He gained prominence as the founder of Roivant Sciences, a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to accelerating drug development through innovative corporate structures.

In addition to his business ventures, Ramaswamy has authored several books that explore themes such as corporate culture, stakeholder capitalism, and the intersection of business and politics. He advocates for principles including free markets, individual liberty, and merit-based achievement.

Incidents like Branca’s comments can be amplified on social media, transforming a private or seemingly innocuous action into a viral topic of debate.

The backlash against Branca’s remarks highlights the ongoing discussions surrounding race, culture, and identity in contemporary society, particularly in the context of public figures and their actions.

As the conversation continues, many are left questioning the implications of such remarks and the broader societal attitudes they reflect.

According to The American Bazaar, the incident has sparked significant outrage and calls for accountability in media discourse.

Trump and Susie Wild Host Engaging Show for Indian-American Audience

In a revealing Vanity Fair interview, Susie Wiles, Donald Trump’s chief of staff, discusses her boss’s personality, the dynamics within the White House, and the challenges facing the administration.

Susie Wiles, known as the “Ice Maiden” by Donald Trump, has been a steady force in the White House, contrasting sharply with the chaos of Trump’s first term. In a recent Vanity Fair interview, the 68-year-old political operative shared insights about her boss and the unique personalities that make up his administration.

Wiles compared Trump to her late father, legendary sportscaster Pat Summerall, suggesting that he possesses “an alcoholic’s personality.” She described this trait as a mindset where Trump believes there is “nothing he can’t do. Nothing, zero, nothing.” This characterization raises questions about the psychological underpinnings of Trump’s leadership style.

In her candid remarks, Wiles labeled Vice President JD Vance a “conspiracy theorist” and described White House budget director Russell Vought as “a right-wing absolute zealot.” She also referred to Elon Musk, a former ally of Trump, as “an odd, odd duck,” acknowledging Musk’s reputation as a genius and his reported use of ketamine.

Wiles revealed that significant disagreements have arisen within the administration, particularly regarding the implementation of tariffs. She admitted that the administration needs to “look harder” at its mass deportation processes and that she had to align herself with Trump’s decision to extend blanket pardons to those involved in the January 6 Capitol riots.

Despite her attempts to establish a “loose agreement” with Trump to end political retribution after 90 days, Wiles ultimately conceded that Trump often has his way. “In some cases, it may look like retribution,” she acknowledged, adding, “And there may be an element of that from time to time. Who would blame him? Not me.”

Wiles also touched on Trump’s controversial relationship with the late Jeffrey Epstein, criticizing Attorney General Pam Bondi for failing to recognize the fervor of Trump’s right-wing supporters regarding Epstein’s files. Just days after the interview, the Justice Department released hundreds of thousands of pages of documents related to Epstein, but many were heavily redacted, raising concerns about transparency.

Despite Trump’s well-documented friendship with Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s, his name was rarely mentioned in the released documents, while former President Bill Clinton was prominently featured.

The late-night talk show circuit had a field day with Wiles’ interview. Jimmy Kimmel humorously referred to her as “the future former chief of staff,” prompting speculation about whether Trump and Wiles were engaging in a good cop-bad cop routine.

Wiles dismissed the Vanity Fair article as “a disingenuously framed hit piece” on both herself and the Trump administration, yet she did not dispute any of the facts or quotes presented. Trump came to her defense, calling her “fantastic.”

In a surprising turn, Trump delivered a succinct sales pitch on television the night following Wiles’ interview, highlighting the accomplishments of his first term and the challenges ahead. He blamed his predecessor, Joe Biden, for various issues, claiming, “Good evening, America. Eleven months ago, I inherited a mess, and I’m fixing it.” He went on to assert that the U.S. is “poised for an economic boom the likes of which the world has never seen.”

Wiles played a key role in encouraging Trump to deliver this rare prime-time address. According to a television pool report, she reminded him of the time constraint, saying, “I told you 20 minutes,” to which Trump responded by sticking to the schedule.

In a move that reflects his penchant for branding, Trump renamed the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to the Trump-Kennedy Center, following a vote by his hand-picked board of trustees. This change, however, may require congressional approval.

Additionally, new plaques were installed under presidential portraits on Trump’s “Presidential Walk of Fame” in the White House colonnade. Many of these plaques, reportedly written by Trump himself, present a distorted version of history. For example, the plaque under the portrait of “Sleepy Joe Biden” labels him “the worst President in American History,” while the one under “Barack Hussein Obama” calls him “one of the most divisive figures in American history.”

As for the funding of these plaques and whether government resources were used for their installation, the White House has not provided any information.

In response to Trump’s actions, California Governor Gavin Newsom took to social media to mockingly post his own version of a Trump plaque, stating, “DONALD IS FINISHED – HE IS NO LONGER ‘HOT’… DONNIE J MISSED ‘THE DEADLINE’ (WHOOPS!) AND NOW I RUN THE SHOW.”

Meanwhile, a social media account humorously dubbed ‘DiaperDiplomacy’ shared an AI-generated, childlike version of Trump’s speech, depicting him boasting about various policies while poking fun at his leadership style.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, Wiles’ revelations and Trump’s ongoing branding efforts highlight the complexities and controversies surrounding this administration.

According to Vanity Fair, the dynamics within the White House remain as unpredictable as ever.

US Affirms India’s Role as Key Partner Despite Pax Silica Absence

The United States reaffirmed India’s importance as a strategic partner in supply chain security and advanced technologies, despite India’s absence from the inaugural Pax Silica Summit.

WASHINGTON, DC – The United States has emphasized that India continues to be a vital strategic partner in the areas of supply chain security and advanced technologies, even though New Delhi did not participate in the inaugural Pax Silica Summit. This new U.S.-led initiative aims to secure the global silicon and semiconductor supply chain.

During a recent news conference organized by the Foreign Press Centre, Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs Jacob Helberg addressed speculation surrounding India’s absence from the summit. He stated that the conjecture linking India’s non-participation to political tensions with Washington was misplaced and incorrect.

Helberg clarified, “My understanding is that there was a lot of speculation behind India not participating in the Pax Silica Summit. I want to be clear that the conversations between the United States and India pertaining to trade arrangements are a completely separate and parallel track to our discussions on supply chain security. We are not conflating those two things.”

He further highlighted that the U.S. views India as a highly strategic potential partner in efforts related to supply chain security and expressed a desire to engage with India on these matters.

The Pax Silica initiative, launched last week, includes an initial group of countries that are closely linked to semiconductor manufacturing and advanced technology supply chains. This group comprises Singapore, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the United Kingdom. The framework aims to reduce vulnerabilities in global supply chains that support various industries, including smartphones, automobiles, and artificial intelligence.

On the subject of India, Helberg underscored that engagement with New Delhi is ongoing and active. He noted that he is in nearly daily communication with officials in Delhi and mentioned that Washington is actively exploring ways to deepen collaboration swiftly.

Helberg also pointed to an upcoming opportunity for high-level engagement, revealing that he will attend the ‘India AI Impact Summit’ in February. He indicated that the U.S. plans to significantly enhance bilateral collaboration with India on economic security issues and suggested that Indian participation in future Pax Silica-related efforts remains a distinct possibility.

Earlier in the briefing, Helberg explained that the initial group of Pax Silica countries was intentionally limited to those forming the core of semiconductor manufacturing, such as Singapore, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and the Netherlands, before potentially expanding to include areas like critical minerals.

This ongoing dialogue reflects the United States’ commitment to strengthening its partnership with India, particularly in the context of global supply chain security and technological advancements, as both nations navigate the complexities of international trade and economic cooperation.

According to IANS, the U.S. remains optimistic about India’s future involvement in initiatives like Pax Silica, reinforcing the notion that collaboration between the two countries is both necessary and beneficial.

India Introduces Nuclear Bill with Operator Protections and Privatization Changes

India’s government has introduced the SHANTI Bill, aiming to privatize the nuclear sector and enhance safety regulations while targeting 100 gigawatts of nuclear power capacity by 2047.

NEW DELHI – On December 16, Union Minister of State for Science and Technology Jitendra Singh presented the ‘Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India’ (SHANTI) Bill, 2025, in Parliament. This significant legislation aims to open the nuclear industry to private players, with a goal of achieving 100 gigawatts (GW) of nuclear power capacity by 2047.

The proposed bill seeks to repeal the existing ‘Atomic Energy Act of 1962’ and the ‘Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act of 2010.’ By doing so, it aims to facilitate private sector participation while restructuring the legal framework surrounding accident compensation.

One of the key features of the SHANTI Bill is the introduction of provisions that effectively exempt nuclear reactor suppliers from liability concerning faulty equipment. Additionally, it shields operators from certain tort claims made by victims of nuclear accidents. This aspect of the bill addresses long-standing demands from the international nuclear industry, particularly from U.S. firms, which have advocated for protections against compensation claims in the event of an accident.

According to the statement of objects and reasons accompanying the bill, India has made significant strides in achieving self-reliance across the nuclear fuel cycle. The government asserts that its experience in managing the nuclear power program responsibly positions it to enhance nuclear installed capacity. This expansion is intended to support clean energy security and provide reliable, round-the-clock power for emerging needs, such as data centers and future-ready applications.

The SHANTI Bill also proposes a revised civil liability framework for nuclear damage, confers statutory status on the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, and strengthens mechanisms related to safety, security, safeguards, quality assurance, and emergency preparedness. Furthermore, it outlines the creation of new institutional arrangements, including an Atomic Energy Redressal Advisory Council, the designation of Claims Commissioners, and a Nuclear Damage Claims Commission to address cases involving severe nuclear damage.

This legislative initiative marks a pivotal moment in India’s approach to nuclear energy, reflecting a commitment to modernize the sector while addressing the concerns of private investors and enhancing safety protocols.

According to IANS, the introduction of the SHANTI Bill signals a transformative shift in India’s nuclear policy, aiming to balance the need for increased energy capacity with robust safety measures.

From Babysitter to Business Owner: An Indian-American’s Journey of Resilience

Muna’s journey from a struggling babysitter to a successful business owner highlights the resilience of immigrants and the vital role they play in American society.

Muna is among the many Somalis who have found refuge in the United States through Temporary Protected Status (TPS) since the onset of civil war in Somalia in 1991. This conflict has claimed the lives of as many as 1 million people, forcing countless others to flee their homeland, often ending up in refugee camps for years.

Arriving in San Diego in 1999 with her 6-month-old baby and no connections, Muna began her American journey by knocking on doors, seeking families in need of a babysitter. Over the next four years, she worked in 20 different households as a nanny and housekeeper, sometimes even sleeping on the floor. Despite the hardships, Muna persevered, and in 2018, she took the bold step of starting her own childcare business, which has since flourished.

“It’s a lot of kids to run,” she said with a laugh. “But it’s worth it.”

Muna’s story is a testament to the resilience and determination often found among immigrants, particularly women who frequently assume caregiving roles in American families. “Everything is hard,” she reflected. “Nothing is easy to become an American and get your papers.”

In her early years in the U.S., Muna faced numerous challenges. She began her work at a starting wage of $6.45 per hour, often enduring difficult living conditions. “When people see you don’t have nothing, they can do anything,” she recalled. The struggles intensified when her daughter faced bullying from boys in the households where they lived.

“I didn’t mind—but when they started hitting my daughter, it was too much,” Muna said, emphasizing the emotional toll of her situation.

Despite these challenges, Muna managed to carve out some time for herself, working at a nearby store. Her determination allowed her to save enough money to rent an apartment, transitioning to a full-time retail position where she eventually became a store manager. Along the way, she met and married a U.S. citizen, welcomed a second daughter, and became a naturalized citizen in 2023.

When Muna decided to start her own business, she chose childcare, opening a small daycare center in her home that is licensed to care for eight children at a time. Her afternoon slots are consistently full, and she often has to turn families away. Muna is now saving to purchase a larger home to accommodate more children, with her daughter assisting her in the business.

As the owner-operator of her daycare, Muna’s responsibilities include caring for infants, transporting children to and from school, taking them to the park and library, and assisting with homework. In addition to her business, she serves on the board of Global Village, a housing project currently under development, and volunteers with the Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans, where she supports newly arrived refugees.

For the first time since moving to the United States, Muna enjoys weekends off. “In the seven years, I know what the Saturday-Sunday thing is,” she said, laughing. “It’s so nice, so nice.”

Muna’s journey reflects not only her personal resilience but also the broader narrative of immigrant contributions to American society. Her story serves as an inspiration to many, illustrating the transformative power of determination and hard work.

According to American Immigration Council, Muna’s experience underscores the vital role that immigrant women play in the caregiving landscape of the United States.

Why the U.S. Excluded India from the Pax Silica Framework

The United States has excluded India from its newly launched Pax Silica initiative, raising concerns about geopolitical and economic implications for both nations.

Escalating tensions between the United States and India have surfaced once again, as the U.S. has notably excluded India from its new strategic initiative, Pax Silica. This initiative aims to create a secure and innovative silicon supply chain, encompassing critical minerals, energy inputs, advanced manufacturing, semiconductors, artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure, and logistics.

Pax Silica was formally announced during a summit in Washington, D.C., where representatives from various participating countries signed the Pax Silica Declaration. This declaration affirms their commitment to cooperate on supply chains that are essential for AI, semiconductors, advanced manufacturing, and related infrastructure.

The initiative includes major players such as Japan, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and Australia. Additionally, guest contributions were made by Taiwan, the European Union, Canada, and the OECD. However, India was notably absent from this coalition.

At the inaugural summit, representatives discussed collaborative efforts to strengthen supply chains that span critical minerals, energy inputs, semiconductor production, data centers, and logistics networks. The primary goal of Pax Silica is to reduce dependencies on concentrated sources of critical materials and technology, particularly in light of China’s dominant position in rare earths and chip manufacturing.

By promoting cooperation among allied nations, Pax Silica aims to coordinate research and development, manufacturing, infrastructure investment, and joint ventures in strategic sectors that are vital for AI and future technologies. The initiative also emphasizes the importance of building a trusted and secure technology ecosystem, safeguarding sensitive technologies and infrastructure, and enhancing economic security in a world increasingly driven by AI and advanced computing.

The launch of Pax Silica underscores the growing significance of securing supply chains and technological infrastructure in an era characterized by rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and semiconductor-driven innovation. By uniting leading technology and industrial nations, the initiative reflects a collective effort to reduce reliance on concentrated sources of critical materials, improve resilience, and foster stability across sectors crucial for economic and technological development.

However, the exclusion of certain countries, including India, highlights how strategic, economic, and geopolitical considerations influence participation in global technology partnerships. This exclusion could indicate potential diplomatic or trade tensions, prompting countries outside the initiative to explore alternative strategies for securing resources and maintaining competitiveness in key industries.

India’s exclusion from Pax Silica may limit the initiative’s access to one of the world’s largest and fastest-growing technology markets. The country boasts a significant portion of the global software services industry, a rapidly expanding semiconductor ecosystem, and a large pool of skilled engineers and technology professionals. By not including India, Pax Silica risks missing opportunities to leverage India’s human capital, innovation capabilities, and emerging technology startups, which could enhance research and development efforts, AI deployment, and semiconductor innovation within the coalition.

Moreover, India possesses substantial reserves of certain critical minerals and has burgeoning capabilities in manufacturing and renewable energy, both of which are essential for constructing resilient supply chains. The exclusion from the initiative could hinder collaborative efforts to diversify sourcing of raw materials, mitigate supply chain risks, and establish a broader, more geographically balanced network.

Furthermore, this exclusion may limit Pax Silica’s influence in shaping global standards, technology governance, and trade norms in sectors where India is emerging as a significant player. In the long term, these gaps could diminish the overall effectiveness and reach of Pax Silica’s strategic objectives.

As the global landscape continues to evolve, the implications of India’s exclusion from the Pax Silica initiative will likely resonate across various sectors and influence future diplomatic relations between the United States and India, as well as their respective roles in the global technology ecosystem.

According to The American Bazaar, the ongoing developments surrounding Pax Silica will be closely monitored as countries reassess their strategic partnerships and technological collaborations in response to shifting geopolitical dynamics.

Nutrient Deficiency May Increase Heart Disease Risk for Millions

Global omega-3 deficiency affects 76% of people worldwide, significantly increasing risks for heart disease, cognitive decline, and chronic inflammation, according to a new study.

A recent analysis has revealed that more than three-quarters of the global population is not meeting the recommended intake levels of omega-3 fatty acids, a nutrient gap that could lead to increased risks of heart disease, cognitive decline, chronic inflammation, and vision problems. This finding comes from a study published in *Nutrition Research Reviews*, conducted by researchers from the University of East Anglia, the University of Southampton, and Holland & Barrett.

The review indicates that 76% of individuals worldwide are falling short of the recommended daily intake of two essential omega-3 fats: eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Global health authorities recommend that most adults aim for at least 250 milligrams of EPA and DHA per day, yet actual intake levels are significantly lower in many regions.

To delve deeper into the health implications of low omega-3 intake, Fox News Digital consulted with Michelle Routhenstein, a preventive cardiology dietitian based in New York at Entirely Nourished. Routhenstein confirmed that low omega-3 levels can adversely affect heart health, cognitive function, and inflammation throughout the body.

According to Routhenstein, insufficient omega-3 intake can elevate the risk of heart attacks and sudden cardiac death. It is also associated with higher triglyceride levels, irregular heart rhythms, and plaque buildup in the arteries. Furthermore, inadequate omega-3 levels have been linked to cognitive decline, a heightened risk of Alzheimer’s disease, and increased rates of depression.

Routhenstein pointed out that low omega-3 levels may exacerbate inflammation in autoimmune conditions, such as psoriasis, and can negatively impact eye health, as omega-3s play a crucial structural role in the retina.

To improve omega-3 levels, Routhenstein emphasized the importance of understanding both the required intake and the best sources of these essential fats. She noted that the richest dietary sources of EPA and DHA are oily fish, including salmon, mackerel, sardines, herring, trout, and anchovies. For many individuals, consuming oily fish three to four times per week can be beneficial.

For those who do not regularly eat fish, omega-3 supplements can help raise EPA and DHA levels to healthier ranges. Routhenstein advised that dosing for omega-3 supplements should be tailored based on lab results, medications, omega-3 levels, and overall medical history. Generally, moderate, quality-controlled supplements are considered safe for most individuals.

There is also evidence supporting the use of prescription-strength omega-3 products. Routhenstein noted that high-dose EPA, such as 4 grams per day of icosapent ethyl, has been shown to reduce major cardiovascular events in certain high-risk populations. However, similar doses of mixed EPA/DHA have not consistently demonstrated the same benefits.

Testing omega-3 levels can provide insight into whether an individual’s intake is adequate. The omega-3 index, a blood test that measures EPA and DHA in red blood cells, is regarded as one of the most reliable methods for assessing omega-3 status. Routhenstein explained that levels around 8% are associated with a lower cardiovascular risk, while levels below approximately 4% are considered low.

Understanding one’s baseline omega-3 levels can help guide more personalized dietary and supplementation decisions. Individuals who are uncertain about their omega-3 status or whether supplementation is appropriate are encouraged to consult with a healthcare provider to determine the best course of action.

According to Routhenstein, addressing omega-3 deficiency could play a significant role in improving overall health and reducing the risk of serious health issues.

India’s Cultural Shift: From ‘Anything Goes’ to ‘Yes Means Yes’

In a follow-up to his previous column, Vinson Xavier Palathingal discusses the importance of assimilation for Indians living in the West, advocating for a cultural shift towards integrity and accountability.

Assimilation is not about abandoning one’s roots; it is about understanding the values of the society we choose to live in and adapting with honesty and humility. In my last column, “India vs. West: Why ‘Yes Means Yes’ Beats ‘Sub Kuch Chalta Hai’ (‘Anything Goes’) in a Rules-Driven World,” published on December 11, 2025, I argued that while talent and intelligence have taken Indians far, true respect abroad will come only when integrity, punctuality, and reliability define the Indian global identity.

The response to that piece has been intense, particularly from fellow Indians and many within the Hindu community. Such reactions were not unexpected. When long-held cultural assumptions are examined at their roots, discomfort is inevitable. This follow-up is not intended to argue with critics or trade accusations but to clarify intent, correct misunderstandings, and deepen the discussion around the root causes I believe we must honestly confront.

This discourse is not meant to frame India and the West as competitors. Rather, it seeks to understand why two civilizations evolved differently and what responsibilities naturally fall on those who leave one system and choose to live within another.

Assimilation is the responsibility of minorities everywhere. Let me begin with absolute clarity: I am not finding fault with India, Hinduism, or Indian culture as a whole. Instead, I am pointing out the foundational logic behind two different civilizational systems and explaining why friction arises when people transition from one to the other.

Migration flows overwhelmingly from India to the West, not the other way around. This simple fact matters. Wherever people migrate and become a minority, they must recalibrate their beliefs and behaviors to assimilate into the host society. This principle applies universally, including within India itself. Indians instinctively understand this when minorities attempt to alter India’s cultural or social norms. The same logic applies in reverse.

If Indians choose to live in Western societies and benefit from their freedoms, institutions, and protections, then adaptation should not be viewed as submission; it is a sign of maturity. This is not asking too much of Indians; it is asking what every civilization expects of newcomers.

We must confront an uncomfortable but necessary observation: the deep injustices embedded in the Indian caste system were never meaningfully corrected from within Hindu society over centuries. Real reform required external influence—Western legal frameworks, Christian missionary education, British administrative intervention, and later constitutional enforcement. In contrast, the West’s gravest moral failures, such as slavery and segregation, were confronted and corrected largely from within. Abolitionists quoted the Bible, and civil rights leaders appealed to moral absolutes already embedded in Western thought. The system possessed the philosophical tools needed for its own correction.

This is not an insult; it is an observation. Today, many Indians celebrate economic success in the West without acknowledging the moral and institutional foundations that made such success possible. As someone trained in root cause analysis, I am not interested in celebrating outcomes while ignoring inputs. My focus is on fixing causes, not defending pride or manufacturing excuses.

Another factor that must be acknowledged is the impact of post-independence socialism in India. The country chose decades of centralized control, government ownership, and diluted personal responsibility. When everything belongs to the government, nothing truly belongs to the citizen. When no one owns the system personally, abusing it feels morally neutral.

This mindset is captured perfectly in two Malayalam adages many of us grew up hearing. The first suggests that resources exist to be exploited rather than respected, reflecting a worldview where bending rules is seen as cleverness rather than dishonesty. This mindset does not translate well into societies where ownership, accountability, and consequences are personal and immediate.

Western systems are generally simpler, more direct, and easier to implement. This simplicity is precisely why progress becomes visible faster. In contrast, Indian systems are ancient, layered, and deeply nuanced. They are broad and deep but also complex and slow to adapt. There is no shame in this difference.

However, the direction of movement matters. Indians migrate to the West in search of opportunity, not the other way around. Those who arrive cannot expect to reshape local norms without resistance. Any society would view such attempts as invasive. Indians understand this instinctively when the discussion is about India, and the same principle applies abroad.

This discussion is not about cultural superiority; there is no scoreboard. We are immigrants. Assimilation is not weakness; it is the strongest investment we can make in our children’s future. Recognizing this reality is not bootlicking, as some have accused me of; it is realism.

I call America my home because it is my children’s home. Wanting harmony, safety, and dignity for them requires honest self-correction, not defensive outrage. The West’s strength lies in its ability to correct course simply and without drama. That trait is worth learning, not mocking.

To clarify, I never said anything negative about India or Indian culture. I spoke directly and exclusively to Indians who have immigrated to the West, urging them to recalibrate their beliefs around rules, fairness, punctuality, and integrity. Nothing more.

Name-calling does not solve root causes. Emotional reactions do not fix systemic friction. Honest self-assessment does. My goal remains unchanged from the previous column: to protect Indians abroad, reduce resentment before it hardens into hostility, and encourage assimilation so our children inherit opportunity rather than suspicion. That requires courage and, above all, honesty.

According to The American Bazaar, this ongoing dialogue is essential for fostering understanding and respect between cultures.

Piyush Goyal Indicates No Deadline for US Tariff Agreement

Union Minister Piyush Goyal announced that trade talks between India and the U.S. are progressing well, but emphasized there is no deadline for finalizing a tariff deal.

MUMBAI – On December 11, Union Minister Piyush Goyal stated that the ongoing trade discussions between Indian and U.S. officials are advancing positively. However, he made it clear that there is no set deadline for reaching an agreement.

During a briefing about U.S. Deputy Trade Representative Rick Switzer’s recent two-day visit to New Delhi, Goyal remarked, “We had very good substantive discussions. But I have said on record that a deal is only done when both sides stand to benefit. We should never negotiate with deadlines because you tend to make mistakes then.”

Goyal elaborated on the nature of the current discussions, noting, “Negotiations are progressing well. We’ve had substantive discussions over several rounds of negotiations. In the past, I think five rounds have happened. The current visit is not a negotiating round. The current visit is being undertaken by a new Deputy United States Trade Representative (USTR) who has joined about three months ago. It’s his first visit to India. We’re getting to know each other.”

On December 10, India’s Commerce Secretary Rajesh Agrawal and U.S. Deputy Trade Representative Switzer engaged in discussions regarding the proposed bilateral trade agreement between the two nations.

As the talks continue, both sides appear committed to fostering a mutually beneficial relationship, with Goyal emphasizing the importance of thorough negotiations over rushed agreements.

This ongoing dialogue reflects the broader context of U.S.-India trade relations, which have seen fluctuations and challenges in recent years. The absence of a deadline suggests a cautious approach, prioritizing the quality of the agreement over speed.

According to IANS, the discussions are part of a larger effort to enhance trade ties between the two countries, which have been working towards a comprehensive trade agreement that addresses various sectors and concerns.

Trump’s Gold Card: A Million-Dollar Ticket to the American Dream

President Trump has introduced a new immigration pathway, the Gold Card, which allows wealthy individuals to fast-track their residency in the U.S. for a $1 million investment.

In a bold move aimed at reshaping the immigration landscape, President Trump has unveiled the Gold Card, a new pay-to-immigrate pathway that promises legal status and a potential route to citizenship for those willing to invest $1 million. This announcement comes at a time when many qualified visa applicants feel that their dreams of American residency are increasingly out of reach.

On Wednesday, Trump introduced the Gold Card during a White House roundtable, launching a dedicated website, trumpcard.gov, where prospective applicants can begin the process. The program requires individuals to pay a non-refundable application fee of $15,000 to the federal government, in addition to the $1 million investment. Corporations seeking to sponsor foreign employees will need to invest $2 million per employee.

The Gold Card is intended to replace the existing EB-5 investor visa program, which has been in place since 1990. Under the EB-5 rules, applicants must invest approximately $1 million and create at least ten American jobs. In contrast, the Gold Card offers a more streamlined approach, though it remains to be seen how it will coexist with the EB-5 program.

Trump has positioned the Gold Card as a means to generate revenue for the federal treasury while attracting top talent from around the globe. He described the Gold Card as “basically, it’s a green card but much better,” emphasizing that it provides a “much stronger path” to residency.

Victor A. Espinosa, Vice President of Global Business Development at the Peachtree Group, a real estate investment firm based in San Francisco, noted that the Gold Card has sparked significant interest among investors. “As global families evaluate U.S. immigration strategies, the proposed Trump Gold Card has naturally sparked conversation among many of the EB-5 investors I advise,” he said. “While it is still only a proposal—not a formal policy—the curiosity around how it might coexist with EB-5 is understandable. It has created a new layer of complexity.”

As of now, critical details regarding the Gold Card, such as job generation requirements, corporate criteria, and potential annual caps, have yet to be disclosed. The official website states, “For a $15,000 DHS processing fee and, after background approval, a contribution of $1 million, receive U.S. residency in record time with the Trump Gold Card.” It also mentions that the application process will take “weeks” and will include an interview, with additional fees to the State Department possibly applying based on the applicant’s circumstances.

Espinosa advises investors to carefully consider their options. “My role is to help clients evaluate every potential option. If the Gold Card were ever enacted, it would likely serve as a complementary pathway, not a replacement. Investors may ultimately choose a dual-track evaluation—assessing EB-5 for permanent residency while monitoring any developments around the proposed Gold Card for shorter-term or specialized benefits,” he explained.

The website also hints at an even more exclusive opportunity with the forthcoming Trump Platinum Card, which will allow foreign nationals to spend up to 270 days in the U.S. without being subject to U.S. taxes on non-U.S. income, provided they make a $5 million contribution along with the $15,000 processing fee.

As the landscape of U.S. immigration continues to evolve, the question remains: will the Gold Card pave a smoother path to the American dream for those with the financial means? Espinosa emphasizes the importance of informed decision-making. “The key is to make informed, strategic decisions. Advisors like me will commit to guiding investors through whichever route best aligns with their goals as more details emerge,” he concluded.

This new initiative reflects the ongoing debate over immigration policy in the United States, particularly regarding the balance between attracting foreign investment and ensuring equitable access to residency for all potential immigrants.

As the Gold Card proposal unfolds, it will be crucial for prospective investors to stay informed and evaluate their options carefully, particularly as more details about the program are released.

According to Victor A. Espinosa, the Gold Card could represent a significant shift in how wealthy individuals approach U.S. residency.

Marius CEO Calls for Overhaul of Testosterone Therapy Regulations at FDA Panel

At a recent FDA panel, Marius Pharmaceuticals CEO Shalin Shah and other experts advocated for a significant overhaul of testosterone therapy regulations to enhance treatment access and align with modern healthcare practices.

WASHINGTON, DC: Shalin Shah, CEO of Marius Pharmaceuticals, joined a panel of experts at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Wednesday to advocate for expanded access to testosterone therapy. This session was part of a series of discussions the FDA has initiated this year to gather insights from medical professionals regarding potential regulatory changes.

During the panel, FDA Commissioner Marty Marky expressed the agency’s commitment to understanding the complexities surrounding testosterone therapy without preconceived biases. Dr. Brian Christine, Assistant Secretary for Health at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), emphasized the importance of the panel, noting that discussions about men’s hormonal health have long been overlooked. He described the gathering as a pivotal moment in addressing these critical health issues.

Shah, alongside other notable panelists including Dr. Landon Trost, director of the Male Fertility and Peyronie’s Clinic in Orem, Utah; Dr. Helen Bernie, associate professor of urology at the Indiana University School of Medicine; and Dr. John Mulhall, urologic surgeon at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, called for a modernization of outdated medical and regulatory frameworks. Shah argued that these frameworks currently hinder millions of men from receiving necessary care for testosterone deficiency, a condition that can significantly impact overall health.

“The FDA, with its global leadership on healthcare standards, has the opportunity to drive a framework that can impact half a billion men and women globally who need testosterone and hormone therapy,” Shah stated.

The panel focused on Testosterone Replacement Therapy (TRT), a treatment designed for men whose bodies do not produce sufficient testosterone. The panelists strongly advocated for increasing access to TRT, highlighting the health issues associated with low testosterone levels, which can lead to decreased libido, fatigue, mood changes, and loss of muscle mass.

In 2015, the FDA mandated significant label changes for testosterone products, introducing warnings about potential risks of heart attack and stroke and restricting approved use to men with confirmed hypogonadism. Shah praised the FDA for reconsidering the scientific evidence surrounding testosterone deficiency, arguing that current regulations are based on outdated fears rather than medical facts.

“Testosterone deficiency is a disease amplifier,” Shah explained. “There is an androgen receptor on nearly every organ in our body, and our body should not be devoid of this critical hormone.” He pointed out that prior to the 2015 label changes, clinicians were able to treat testosterone deficiency without needing to meet stringent criteria, similar to how other medical conditions are managed.

Shah noted that recent advancements in testosterone therapy have brought renewed hope to millions of men experiencing low testosterone levels. Marius Pharmaceuticals, founded by Indian American entrepreneur Himanshu Shah, introduced Kyzatrex, an oral testosterone drug aimed at treating adult men with low or absent testosterone levels due to specific medical conditions.

Despite the potential benefits of TRT, Shah and other panelists highlighted that it has been underutilized due to lingering concerns linking it to prostate cancer, stroke, and heart disease. Shah framed testosterone therapy not as a means of enhancement but as a vital preventive tool against chronic diseases. He urged the FDA to expedite the approval process for broader indications that recognize testosterone deficiency as a critical component of managing comorbid metabolic diseases.

Shah also drew attention to the rise of GLP-1 medications, such as Ozempic and Wegovy, which are used for weight loss but can lead to rapid muscle loss. He warned that this trend underscores the urgent need for regulatory action regarding testosterone therapy.

“A massive case study is unfolding before our eyes,” Shah remarked, noting that nearly 20% of American adults have tried or are currently using GLP-1 drugs. “Shockingly, 40% of the weight loss that occurs is lean muscle.” He contrasted the billions spent by pharmaceutical companies on new, experimental treatments with the underutilization of existing hormonal therapies, calling for a decisive action from the FDA.

Shah criticized the structural failures within the healthcare system that create barriers to preventive care, including insurance limitations and regulatory inconsistencies. He shared that Marius launched Kyzatrex as a cash-only model to ensure direct access for patients, emphasizing that the traditional medical system often does not prioritize preventive care.

He proposed that the framework for testosterone therapy should begin with improved testing and coverage. Shah highlighted the challenges men face in obtaining testosterone level tests and advocated for mandatory screening, particularly for those with metabolic dysfunctions such as depression.

“The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force should implement mandatory coverage to support this framework,” he urged. He also called for equal coverage of all testosterone formulations, including oral therapies like Kyzatrex, by Medicare and commercial insurers.

Shah suggested that the Department of Health and Human Services consider testosterone therapy an essential health benefit, which would help reduce access barriers for millions of men. He noted that Marius Pharmaceuticals is committed to supporting government efforts to make testosterone therapy affordable.

In a pointed critique, Shah addressed the legal classification of testosterone, arguing that it is regulated more strictly than substances with higher abuse potential. He provided financial data from the Department of Veterans Affairs, which indicated that normalizing testosterone levels in hypogonadal men led to significant reductions in mortality and cardiovascular events.

“In the VA, normalization of testosterone in over 80,000 hypogonadal men was associated with a 56% lower all-cause mortality and meaningful reductions in heart attacks and strokes,” Shah stated. He emphasized that applying these results on a national scale could yield substantial savings for the healthcare system.

Shah concluded by asserting that addressing low testosterone is not merely a cosmetic issue but a significant preventive care opportunity. “This doesn’t count frailty, falls, dementia, productivity, and other benefits. For Medicare and our healthcare system, low testosterone is a multibillion-dollar preventive care opportunity,” he said.

According to The American Bazaar, Shah’s remarks at the FDA panel reflect a growing recognition of the importance of testosterone therapy in modern healthcare.

U.S. Supreme Court to Review Limits on Election Spending

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to reconsider longstanding limits on election spending, potentially reshaping the landscape of campaign finance in the wake of a Republican-led challenge.

Caps on election spending may soon become a relic of the past as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear a case that could overturn a quarter-century-old decision. This challenge, spearheaded by a Republican initiative and supported by the Trump administration, seeks to eliminate restrictions on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates for Congress and the presidency.

In 2001, the Supreme Court upheld a provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) that limited coordinated spending by political parties. In the case of Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee, the Court ruled that these limits were constitutional, arguing that unrestricted coordinated expenditures could bypass contribution limits and jeopardize the integrity of federal elections.

This ruling was grounded in the longstanding authority of Congress to regulate campaign finance, aiming to strike a balance between First Amendment rights and the need to prevent corruption or its appearance in federal elections.

As of 2025, the Supreme Court is revisiting this precedent in the case of National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission (NRSC v. FEC). The plaintiffs contend that the campaign finance landscape has undergone significant changes since 2001, rendering previous limits on coordinated spending overly restrictive of political speech and party activities.

They argue that subsequent rulings, particularly Citizens United v. FEC (2010), which expanded the ability of independent groups to spend on elections, have altered the dynamics of campaign finance. The Court has agreed to hear this case during the 2025–2026 term, indicating a potential reevaluation of the constitutional framework governing party-coordinated expenditures.

Following the Trump administration’s collaboration with Republicans to challenge the campaign finance law, the justices appointed a lawyer to defend the existing limits. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the future of campaign finance in the United States.

If the Court decides to strike down or substantially weaken the limits on coordinated spending, political parties may gain the ability to invest significantly more in support of their candidates. This shift could dramatically alter campaign strategies, fundraising efforts, and the overall dynamics of federal elections.

Conversely, if the Court upholds the limits, it would reaffirm Congress’s authority to regulate coordinated spending and maintain a clear distinction between independent and coordinated expenditures. However, the actual impact of any new ruling on campaign finance behavior remains uncertain, as both political strategies and legal interpretations continue to evolve.

Roman Martinez, a seasoned Supreme Court advocate, has proposed a potential resolution for the justices that would allow them to avoid making a definitive ruling. He suggests that the case should be deemed moot, given that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) now aligns with Republicans in asserting that the law is unconstitutional and that there is “no credible risk” of enforcement.

This case before the Supreme Court marks a critical juncture in the ongoing evolution of U.S. campaign finance law. At its heart, the dispute encapsulates a fundamental tension between two principles: the need to protect the integrity of federal elections by preventing corruption or its appearance, and the imperative to safeguard political speech, a core First Amendment right.

The 2001 precedent upheld limits on coordinated spending by political parties, emphasizing Congress’s role in regulating elections and maintaining clear boundaries between independent expenditures and party-directed spending. However, the plaintiffs in the current case argue that developments in campaign finance over the past two decades, particularly following landmark rulings like Citizens United, have rendered these limits outdated and unnecessarily restrictive.

The Supreme Court’s decision in this case could redefine the landscape of campaign finance, influencing how elections are funded and conducted in the years to come, according to The American Bazaar.

Leveraging Digital Public Infrastructure for Effective AI Governance

The Asia Society Policy Institute has outlined key insights from a roundtable in New Delhi, focusing on the role of Digital Public Infrastructure in AI governance ahead of the 2026 AI Impact Summit.

December 5, 2025 — New Delhi: The Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI) has released a comprehensive summary of insights from a high-level, closed-door roundtable held in New Delhi. This event took place in anticipation of the upcoming 2026 AI Impact Summit and shortly after India introduced the Digital Data Protection Act Rules along with its latest AI governance guidelines.

The roundtable centered on how Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) can serve as a foundational techno-legal framework for ensuring safe, equitable, and accountable AI governance in India.

Arun Teja Polcumpally, a JSW Science and Technology Fellow at ASPI Delhi and the author of the summary, emphasized the need for India’s AI governance framework to evolve in parallel with DPI. He stated, “For DPI to support responsible AI, it must be designed with built-in safeguards—fairness, inclusivity, equitable data access, privacy protection, secure interoperability, and broad scalability.”

During the session, participants put forth several strategic recommendations aimed at shaping India’s contributions to the discussions at the 2026 AI Impact Summit. They highlighted the necessity of robust legal and policy frameworks to implement DPIs as effective techno-legal tools for AI governance.

Furthermore, the participants noted that DPIs could facilitate AI development and deployment cycles by providing verifiable and transparent governance mechanisms. They stressed the importance of continuous investment, updates, and modernization of DPI systems to keep pace with the rapidly advancing landscape of AI technologies.

International cooperation was also underscored as essential for building open, secure, and transparent AI ecosystems. The group proposed that India should develop an open-source toolkit for designing DPI-based techno-legal mechanisms for AI governance, collaborating with global partners in a manner akin to the Universal DPI Safeguards framework.

Additionally, the roundtable participants recommended providing free or low-cost access to critical AI infrastructure. This includes GPU-based compute power, open-source AI models, regulatory sandboxes, and curated public datasets, all of which would help accelerate safe and responsible AI innovation.

In conjunction with these discussions, ASPI is hosting several upcoming events that delve into related topics. One such event is the launch of the “China 2026: What to Watch” report on December 10, featuring a keynote conversation with Ian Bremmer and panel discussions with leading experts on China.

Another event, scheduled for December 11, will focus on the evolving dynamics of U.S.-India relations, examining the developments that have affected ties in 2025 and the implications for the unfinished trade deal.

On December 16, ASPI will host a discussion on the risks and opportunities facing the U.S.-Japan alliance, featuring a panel of experts from various fields.

Members of the media interested in attending these events or accessing embargoed versions of the reports are encouraged to reach out via email to pr@asiasociety.org.

These initiatives reflect ASPI’s commitment to fostering dialogue and collaboration on critical issues surrounding AI governance and international relations, as highlighted in the recent roundtable discussions.

According to Asia Society Policy Institute.

The Story Behind Shen Yun: Understanding Its Cultural Significance

Shen Yun, a cultural performance founded by Chinese immigrants in 2006, has become a global phenomenon, despite facing ongoing persecution from the Chinese regime.

In 2006, a small group of first-generation Chinese immigrants, some of whom were fleeing religious persecution, gathered in upstate New York with a shared dream: to revive the traditional arts and culture that were being decimated in China. By the end of that year, they crafted the first performance of what would become Shen Yun.

In less than two decades, Shen Yun has transformed from humble beginnings into a global cultural phenomenon, performing across five continents and in over 200 cities each year. Today, it stands as a testament to beauty, faith, courage, and inspiration, celebrating two decades of artistic expression.

However, this American success story comes at a significant cost. Shen Yun was founded by practitioners of Falun Gong, a Buddhist spiritual practice that has faced brutal suppression by the Chinese regime. Although these artists sought freedom in the United States, they found that the dangers of persecution followed them across the ocean.

Over the years, the organization has experienced numerous challenges, including intrusions by Chinese spies at their headquarters, burglaries at artists’ homes, sabotage of their performance buses, cyberattacks on their websites, and pressure from Chinese embassies urging governments and theaters to cancel Shen Yun’s performances. Additionally, smear campaigns have targeted the group across various American media platforms.

Today, the persecution continues, manifesting in a series of lawsuits and death threats aimed at discrediting and destroying Shen Yun and its artists.

Despite this transnational persecution, Shen Yun remains steadfast in its vision and mission, continuing to thrive and garner overwhelmingly positive feedback from audiences around the world. The impact of their performances is evident, as many attendees describe their experiences as transformative and unforgettable.

Shen Yun is not merely a dance performance; it is a once-in-a-lifetime experience that invites audiences to witness the rich tapestry of Chinese culture and history. For those interested in attending, tickets can be purchased at ShenYun.com/CA or by calling the hotline at 888-633-6999.

According to India Currents, the resilience of Shen Yun in the face of adversity speaks volumes about the dedication of its founders and performers.

Indian-American Community Faces Challenges Amidst Changing Political Landscape

USCIS provides a comprehensive online resource for news, data, and updates related to immigration and citizenship.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) offers a centralized platform for accessing news releases and alerts through its dedicated USCIS News webpage. This resource is searchable by topic and date, ensuring that users can easily find the information they need.

In addition to news releases, the USCIS News webpage includes important updates on policies and procedures, as well as timely information regarding office closures and other emergencies that may affect service delivery.

For those interested in visual content, USCIS maintains a Video and Image Gallery showcasing various aspects of its operations. This gallery provides a glimpse into the work being done across the agency.

The agency also prioritizes transparency by offering a comprehensive Immigration and Citizenship Data page. This section presents a variety of immigration data and statistics, allowing users to delve into the numbers that reflect current immigration trends and patterns.

To keep the public informed, USCIS has established a robust social media presence. Through various social media accounts, individuals can follow the latest updates and gain insights into the agency’s activities and initiatives.

USCIS also shares important speeches, statements, and testimonies from its leadership. These documents are available for search by topic and date, providing valuable context and information about the agency’s priorities and objectives.

For those seeking specific information, the USCIS Electronic Reading Room offers access to documents identified under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Users can search for topics of interest using a convenient drop-down list.

Media representatives can find assistance through USCIS’s Media Contacts section, which connects them with agency representatives located throughout the country. This ensures that inquiries are addressed promptly and accurately.

Lastly, USCIS keeps the public informed about Upcoming Events, including both local and national engagements. This section highlights opportunities for community involvement and engagement with the agency.

For further details and updates, visit the USCIS News webpage, which serves as a vital resource for anyone interested in immigration and citizenship matters, according to USCIS.

US House Panel to Examine India-US Strategic Partnership on December 10

A U.S. congressional panel will hold a public hearing on December 10 to evaluate the India-U.S. strategic partnership, focusing on defense, economic, and diplomatic developments.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – A significant U.S. congressional panel is set to convene a public hearing next week to assess the trajectory of the India-U.S. strategic partnership. This hearing will particularly focus on the evolving defense, economic, and diplomatic dimensions of the relationship.

Titled “The U.S.-India Strategic Partnership: Securing a Free and Open Indo-Pacific,” the hearing is scheduled for December 10, as announced in an official notice from the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on South and Central Asia.

Chaired by Congressman Bill Huizenga of Michigan, the subcommittee will hear from prominent analysts who closely monitor India’s expanding role in the Indo-Pacific region.

Among the witnesses slated to testify are Jeff Smith, Director of the Asian Studies Centre at the Heritage Foundation; Dhruva Jaishankar, Executive Director of ORF America and the son of India’s External Affairs Minister; and Sameer Lalwani, Senior Fellow with the Indo-Pacific Program at the German Marshall Fund of the United States.

The hearing aims to delve into various aspects of the India-U.S. partnership, including India’s defense modernization, enhanced military interoperability with the United States, technology cooperation, regional diplomacy, and collaborative efforts to uphold a rules-based Indo-Pacific. This discussion comes at a time when Washington and New Delhi are expanding joint initiatives in critical technologies, maritime domain awareness, and supply-chain diversification.

The India-U.S. partnership has garnered sustained bipartisan interest in Congress, with lawmakers recognizing New Delhi as a crucial pillar of U.S. strategy in the Indo-Pacific. Hearings of this nature provide an essential platform for lawmakers to scrutinize policies, assess challenges, and reinforce long-term commitments to one of America’s most consequential bilateral relationships.

The announcement of this Congressional hearing coincides with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s arrival in New Delhi for a two-day state visit.

According to IANS, the upcoming hearing underscores the importance of the India-U.S. relationship in the context of global geopolitical dynamics.

Nick Fuentes Criticizes Indian-Americans Amid Controversial Remarks

Right-wing commentator Nick Fuentes has called for India to be added to the list of nations facing a full suspension of U.S. immigration visas, reflecting his ongoing anti-immigrant rhetoric.

WASHINGTON, DC – Controversial right-wing commentator Nick Fuentes has urged that India be included on a list of nineteen countries facing a complete suspension of immigration visas to the United States. This call comes amid a backdrop of his history of inflammatory remarks aimed at various minority groups, with critics often labeling him a neo-Nazi.

The push for India’s inclusion follows a recent shooting incident near the White House, involving an Afghan national who had entered the U.S. in 2021 under Operation Allies Welcome. The shooting, which targeted two National Guard soldiers, prompted the Department of Homeland Security to impose sweeping immigration restrictions.

The current suspension affects several nations, including Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela.

In a tweet, Fuentes stated, “Now do India,” echoing sentiments that resonate with segments of the MAGA base. He has previously argued that Indian nationals, who often enter the U.S. through H-1B visas, are taking jobs and college opportunities away from American citizens. This perspective frames legal immigration programs as being at odds with the America First ideology that Fuentes champions.

Fuentes’ remarks have sparked outrage among many who view his statements as part of a broader trend of xenophobia and racism that has gained traction in certain political circles. His call to restrict immigration from India reflects a growing sentiment among some right-wing factions that seek to limit immigration based on nationality and perceived economic competition.

As the debate over immigration policy continues to evolve, Fuentes’ comments serve as a reminder of the divisive rhetoric that can influence public opinion and policy decisions. The implications of such statements extend beyond mere commentary, potentially affecting the lives of countless individuals seeking opportunities in the United States.

While the Biden administration has made efforts to reform immigration policies, the specter of extremist views like those expressed by Fuentes remains a significant challenge in the ongoing discourse surrounding immigration in America.

As the situation develops, it will be crucial to monitor how these discussions shape the future of immigration policy and the treatment of various communities within the United States.

Source: Original article

Lower Dementia Risk Associated with Routine Vaccination, New Analysis Finds

The shingles vaccine may reduce dementia risk by 20% in older adults, according to a new study from Stanford Medicine, suggesting a potential cause-and-effect relationship.

A recent study from Stanford Medicine indicates that the shingles vaccine could significantly lower the risk of developing dementia among older adults. This research provides the first evidence suggesting a possible cause-and-effect relationship between shingles vaccination and dementia prevention.

According to the findings, older adults who received the shingles vaccine were found to be 20% less likely to develop dementia over a seven-year period compared to those who did not receive the vaccine. Dr. Pascal Geldsetzer, assistant professor of medicine and senior author of the study, emphasized the importance of these findings, stating, “For the first time, we now have evidence that likely shows a cause-and-effect relationship between shingles vaccination and dementia prevention and treatment.”

The study utilized public health data from Wales, where eligibility for the shingles vaccine, known as Zostavax, was determined by birth date. This unique situation created two nearly identical groups of older adults—those born just before the cutoff who qualified for the vaccine and those born just after who did not. This design allowed researchers to compare dementia rates while minimizing biases typically found in observational studies.

Following an initial analysis conducted in April, researchers delved deeper into the data and discovered that the benefits of the vaccine extended beyond just preventing dementia. Over a nine-year period, individuals who received the vaccine were less likely to be diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment. Moreover, those who were vaccinated after receiving a dementia diagnosis had a significantly lower risk of dying from dementia within the following nine years. This suggests that the vaccine may also slow the progression of the disease.

In the follow-up period, nearly half of the Welsh seniors diagnosed with dementia at the start of the vaccination program ultimately died from the condition. In contrast, only 30% of those who had received the vaccine experienced the same fate.

Dr. Geldsetzer noted, “There is a growing body of research showing that viruses that preferentially target your nervous system and hibernate in your nervous system for much of your life may be implicated in the development of dementia.” This includes the chickenpox virus, which remains dormant in the body and can reactivate in older age, leading to shingles. Such reactivation may trigger inflammation in or around the brain, a factor linked to dementia risk, according to experts from the Mayo Clinic.

Preventing viral flare-ups through vaccination could potentially reduce inflammation, thereby lowering the risk of dementia. However, the researchers acknowledged a significant limitation in their study: the health behaviors of vaccinated individuals may differ from those who are unvaccinated. Dr. Geldsetzer pointed out, “We have very little, if any, information on these behaviors in electronic health records or medical claims data.” This lack of data includes crucial factors such as dietary habits and physical activity levels.

Dr. Geldsetzer further emphasized the potential implications of their findings, stating, “If the shingles vaccine really prevents or delays dementia—and, with this new study, also appears to have benefits for those who already have dementia—then this would be a hugely important finding for clinical medicine, population health, and research into the causes of dementia.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to manufacturers of the shingles vaccine for comments regarding the study.

Source: Original article

Apple Challenges India’s Antitrust Penalty Law in Court

Apple is challenging India’s antitrust penalty law, which calculates fines based on global turnover, amid ongoing investigations into its practices in the Indian iOS ecosystem.

Apple is gearing up for a significant legal battle in India as it seeks to contest antitrust proceedings initiated by the Competition Commission of India (CCI). The tech giant aims to challenge a law that permits penalties to be calculated based on a company’s global turnover, a move that could have substantial implications for its operations in the country.

Since 2022, the CCI has been investigating Apple over allegations of abusing its dominant position in the Indian iOS ecosystem. Central to the investigation is the company’s requirement that app developers utilize its in-app purchase (IAP) system, which can impose fees as high as 30%. Critics argue that this practice stifles competition by limiting alternative payment methods.

Reports indicate that Apple could face a staggering penalty of up to $38 billion. This figure has been influenced by claims from Tinder-owner Match Group and various Indian startups, who have convinced the CCI that Apple’s IAP fees are detrimental to smaller competitors and constitute anti-competitive behavior.

From the CCI’s perspective, as well as that of several legal experts, calculating fines based on global turnover is crucial for ensuring a deterrent effect, particularly in digital markets where revenue generated in India represents only a fraction of a global tech firm’s total earnings.

As of December 2025, no final penalty has been imposed on Apple. The Delhi High Court is tasked with determining the validity of the amended penalty law and its applicability in this case. The court’s decision is anticipated to have far-reaching consequences, not only for Apple but also for the broader regulatory landscape governing global tech companies in India.

On Monday, a lawyer representing the CCI accused Apple of attempting to “stall the proceedings,” which date back to 2021. In response, Apple’s legal counsel urged the court to prevent the regulator from taking any coercive actions.

In a private submission to the CCI reported by Reuters in October, Match Group argued that calculating penalties based on global turnover could serve as a significant deterrent against repeat offenses. This case underscores the intricate relationship between regulatory authority, the business models of digital markets, and the interpretation of competition law.

The scrutiny of global technology firms, particularly regarding mandatory in-app payment systems, highlights the challenges regulators face when assessing practices that may restrict competition or disadvantage smaller players.

India’s amended competition law, which allows for fines based on global turnover and enables retrospective application, has ignited discussions about fairness, proportionality, and the extent of regulatory power. While Apple contends that these measures are excessive and legally questionable, regulators and some experts maintain that global-turnover calculations are vital for ensuring effective deterrence in rapidly evolving digital markets.

The outcome of this case could establish a precedent for how India approaches antitrust enforcement against global tech companies, shaping future disputes at the intersection of innovation, competition, and consumer protection.

Source: Original article

Federal Appeals Court Affirms Block on Iowa’s Anti-Immigrant Law

In a significant ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has upheld an injunction against Iowa’s controversial anti-immigrant law, SF 2340, protecting immigrant families and reinforcing constitutional limits on state authority.

On October 23, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit delivered a decisive victory for immigrant communities and the rule of law by upholding an injunction that blocks Iowa’s Senate File 2340 (SF 2340). This law, described as Iowa’s most severe anti-immigration measure, would have criminalized the presence of certain immigrants in the state, even those who are legally authorized to reside in the United States.

SF 2340 aimed to empower local officials to arrest and deport immigrants, a power that the Constitution reserves for federal authorities. This provision was intended to prevent a fragmented immigration policy that could lead to family separations and chaos across state lines.

“This is a tremendous relief for thousands of Iowa families,” stated Erica Johnson, the founding executive director of the Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice (Iowa MMJ), the organization that initiated the lawsuit. “The court’s decision confirms that key members of our community should never have been criminalized simply for being here and living their lives in peace. This ruling restores a sense of safety and dignity to people who call Iowa home.”

The lawsuit, titled Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice v. Bird, was filed by Iowa MMJ alongside two individual plaintiffs, with legal representation from the ACLU of Iowa, the ACLU Immigrant Rights Project, and the American Immigration Council.

Under SF 2340, non-citizens who had previously been deported or denied entry into the United States would have faced criminal charges for residing in Iowa, regardless of any subsequent lawful status or federal permission to return. Additionally, the law would have allowed state and local law enforcement to detain individuals based solely on their presence in the state, while mandating state judges to issue deportation orders. Such powers are constitutionally designated to the federal government to prevent the disarray that could arise from varying state laws.

“SF 2340 is the worst anti-immigrant law in Iowa’s history. Today’s ruling keeps SF 2340 blocked and protects immigrants in Iowa from many serious harms: arrest, detention, deportation, family separation, and incarceration, all by the state,” remarked Rita Bettis Austen, legal director of the ACLU of Iowa. “At a time when the federal government is causing so much harm to families, it’s all the more important that the state is not permitted to make things even worse. The Court reaffirmed that the Iowa legislature does not have the authority to pass its own immigration laws to detain and deport people.”

The law was enacted on April 10, 2024, but was blocked from taking effect on June 17, 2024. Following this, the state of Iowa appealed the decision. With the recent ruling from the Eighth Circuit, the law remains blocked while the case continues in federal court.

Emma Winger, deputy legal director at the American Immigration Council, emphasized the broader implications of the Eighth Circuit’s decision, stating, “The Eighth Circuit’s decision resonates far beyond Iowa. Across the country, we’re seeing states attempt to take immigration enforcement into their own hands. This could create a reality in which a person could be welcomed in one state and arrested in the next, just for crossing a border. Under our Constitution, immigration has to be handled at a federal level so families aren’t trapped in chaos. This ruling upholds that principle.”

Spencer Amdur, senior staff attorney at the ACLU’s national immigrants’ rights project, echoed these sentiments, noting, “Today the Eighth Circuit reiterated what the Supreme Court has said for over a hundred years: States have no business regulating immigration on their own. This law would have torn families apart and denied people their right to live in this country and seek legal protections. The court was right to strike it down, just like courts have done for other laws like this around the country.”

The ongoing legal battle surrounding SF 2340 underscores the critical importance of maintaining a unified federal immigration policy, safeguarding the rights and dignity of immigrant families across the United States.

Source: Original article

US Tech Giants Oppose India’s Proposed 6 GHz Spectrum Allocation

Major American tech companies are opposing India’s plans to allocate the six gigahertz spectrum band for mobile services, advocating instead for its exclusive use for Wi-Fi applications.

American tech giants, including Apple, Amazon, Cisco, Meta, HP, and Intel, have expressed strong opposition to the request by India’s telecom companies, Reliance Jio and Vodafone Idea, to allocate the six gigahertz (GHz) spectrum band for mobile services.

In a joint submission to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), the companies urged regulators to reserve the entire 6 GHz band exclusively for Wi-Fi services. They argue that the band is not technically or commercially ready for deployment in mobile networks.

The joint submission emphasized the need for caution regarding future auctions of specific frequency ranges within the 6 GHz band. “We do not recommend setting timelines for any future auction of the 6425-6725 MHz and 7025-7125 MHz ranges for IMT,” the document stated. It further suggested that TRAI and the Department of Telecommunications should review the allocation of the upper 6 GHz band following the outcomes of the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-27), particularly concerning Agenda Item 1.7, which pertains to the 7.125-8.4 GHz range.

The tech companies proposed that any portion of the upper 6 GHz spectrum that is not immediately utilized should be opened for unlicensed use on an interim basis. This would allow Wi-Fi and other low-power technologies to help bridge the connectivity gap. Government plans indicate that 400 MHz of spectrum in the 6 GHz range will soon be available for auction, with an additional 300 MHz expected to be released by 2030. Furthermore, 500 MHz has been earmarked for delicensing, making it accessible for low-power applications, including Wi-Fi services.

Despite the government’s intention to delicense 500 MHz of the lower 6 GHz band for Wi-Fi and other low-power uses, Reliance Jio has called for the inclusion of the full 1,200 MHz of spectrum in the upcoming auction. The company argues that the entire band, encompassing both lower and upper ranges, should be made available for mobile services to facilitate the expansion of 5G and future 6G networks.

The newly identified frequency blocks of 6425–6725 MHz and 6725–7125 MHz are part of the upper 6 GHz band, which telecom operators view as crucial for enhancing network capacity. However, tech firms maintain that these frequencies are better suited for high-performance Wi-Fi applications.

Vodafone Idea has also requested that 400 MHz of the 6 GHz spectrum currently available be included in the next auction. Meanwhile, Bharti Airtel has advocated for a postponement of the 6 GHz auction, citing concerns regarding ecosystem readiness, including device availability, network infrastructure, and the absence of global standardization.

Qualcomm, a U.S.-based chipset manufacturer, has echoed similar concerns, emphasizing the necessity for a more mature ecosystem before deploying the spectrum for mobile services. “The upper 6 GHz band is critical for mobile growth in India, and it may be noted that several other countries, like China, Brazil, and various European nations, are considering the entire 700 MHz in this Upper 6 GHz band for 6G,” Qualcomm stated. The company added that deferring the auction of the 6425-6725 MHz and 7025-7125 MHz bands until after WRC-27 would safeguard India’s 6G future, align with global standards, and support its leadership aspirations.

The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), which represents major telecom players including Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel, and Vodafone Idea, has voiced strong opposition to the government’s plan to delicense the 6 GHz band. COAI described delicensing as “misleading and counterproductive,” arguing that licensed IMT spectrum ensures quality of service, predictable performance, and nationwide scalability—elements deemed vital for initiatives like Digital Bharat and 6G applications such as connected mobility, automation, and industrial networks.

Furthermore, COAI expressed concerns that unlicensed Wi-Fi deployments by global over-the-top (OTT) players and device manufacturers could undermine licensed usage in the band, reduce government revenues, and create an uneven playing field for telecom operators.

As the debate continues, the future of the 6 GHz spectrum in India remains uncertain, with significant implications for both mobile and Wi-Fi services in the country.

Source: Original article

Harvard Economist Discusses India’s Post-Covid Growth Compared to Major Economies

India has emerged as the leading performer among major global economies in the post-pandemic era, according to Harvard economist Jason Furman’s analysis.

India has distinguished itself as the strongest performer among major global economies in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a recent analysis by Harvard economist Jason Furman. His comparative growth chart, shared on X, highlights how real GDP across key economies has shifted relative to their pre-COVID trajectories, with India notably exceeding its long-term growth trend.

Furman’s graph tracks the economic performance of the United States, Euro Area, China, Russia, and India from 2019 through projected figures for the third quarter of 2025. While many economies continue to grapple with the lingering effects of the pandemic, India’s growth trajectory stands out, showing a significant rise that is expected to reach +3% in 2024 and potentially +5% by the third quarter of 2025.

Furman emphasized that India’s impressive growth is not merely a temporary rebound but rather a result of its structural strengths. These include advancements in digital infrastructure, investment-friendly reforms, and a stable macroeconomic environment.

The chart illustrates a sharp decline for all major economies in 2020:

Euro Area: –25%

China: –10%

United States: –5%

India: –5%

Russia: –8%

Since that time, the recovery paths of these nations have diverged significantly.

The United States experienced a rapid recovery, bolstered by substantial fiscal support measures like the American Rescue Plan, allowing it to stand approximately +2% above trend by 2025. However, India’s resurgence far surpasses the post-pandemic recovery of the U.S.

India not only returned to its pre-COVID growth trend by 2022 but has also surged beyond it. Furman noted the following milestones:

2022: India regains its trendline

2024: Expected growth of +3%

Q3 2025 projection: +5%

According to Furman, the sustained momentum of India’s growth is driven by several factors, including:

Expanding domestic consumption

Strong investment inflows

Rapid rollout of digital infrastructure, including initiatives like UPI, Aadhaar, and e-governance

Production-linked incentives that bolster manufacturing

A stable policy environment

In contrast, China continues to struggle with challenges stemming from real estate stress and the after-effects of its zero-COVID policy, with projections indicating growth around –5% by 2025. Russia, hindered by sanctions following its invasion of Ukraine, is expected to remain near –8%. The Euro Area, impacted by energy shocks and inflation, is projected to hover around –3%. While the U.S. is recovering, it faces concentration risks; Furman pointed out that 92% of U.S. growth in early 2025 is anticipated to come solely from AI-driven data center investments.

International institutions are echoing confidence in India’s economic momentum. ICRA forecasts a GDP growth of 7% in the second quarter of FY26, with industrial output projected to rise to a five-quarter high of 7.8%. Moody’s Ratings also projects growth of 7% in 2025 and 6.4% in 2026, identifying India as the clear outperformer in the Asia-Pacific region, excluding Greater China. Across the Asia-Pacific, Moody’s expects average growth to be just 3.4%, significantly lower than India’s anticipated pace.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates suggest that India could sustain an annual growth rate of 7-8%, driven by digital expansion, manufacturing incentives, a youthful workforce, and resilient services exports. Economists increasingly view India not only as a standout performer but also as a potential development model for other emerging economies navigating global uncertainties.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Ron Hira Defines H-1B as Guest Worker Program

Indian American scholar Ron Hira critiques the H-1B visa program, highlighting its role in worker exploitation and the displacement of American employees during a recent panel discussion.

Indian American scholar Ron Hira, a professor at Howard University and a noted critic of the H-1B visa system, recently shared his insights on the program’s impact on American workers. Speaking at a panel discussion titled “How the H-1B Visa Led to Importing Mass Cheap Labor,” hosted by The Heritage Foundation, Hira outlined the reasons many U.S. employers favor hiring foreign visa holders over American workers.

Hira is well-known for his research on offshoring, high-skilled immigration, and the effects of these practices on employment relations and the middle class. During the panel, he discussed the effectiveness of executive actions taken during the Trump administration aimed at reforming the H-1B program. He remarked, “Back then, 20 years ago, it was obvious that H-1B visa abuse was critical in speeding up the offshoring of these jobs. Yet for the past 20 years, Washington has turned a blind eye to this abuse.”

Hira referenced a 2017 segment from “60 Minutes” that profiled American workers forced to train their H-1B replacements. He highlighted a particularly troubling case involving the University of California, which receives significant state and federal funding to train scientists and engineers. “Now they’re forcing their own tech workers to train their H-1B replacements. Imagine the workers’ humiliation and sense of betrayal,” he said.

He posed a rhetorical question to the audience: “Does anybody really think that that’s how the program is supposed to operate?” He answered his own question, stating, “It’s certainly not sold that way. But it persists today. People are training their replacements today.”

Hira explained that the H-1B program is fundamentally a guest worker program, which he argues is more about labor policy than immigration policy. “All guest worker programs leave workers vulnerable to exploitation, whether it’s high-skilled H-1B or lower-skilled H-2A and H-2B,” he noted. “We need labor policies that protect both American and foreign workers.”

He criticized the current labor protections and regulations surrounding the H-1B program as inadequate, stating, “The H-1B labor protections and regulations and rules are a complete fiasco.” Hira emphasized the need for a redesign of these labor regulations to ensure that the H-1B program does not depress wages, protects workers, and fulfills its intended purpose of addressing genuine labor shortages without displacing American workers.

To illustrate his points, Hira provided real-world examples of how employers exploit the system. He described a situation involving Deloitte Consulting, a top H-1B employer, which claimed that a senior consultant position was actually an entry-level role for the purpose of determining the prevailing wage for H-1B workers. “Now is a senior consultant entry level? Probably not,” he remarked.

Hira expressed further concerns about the H-1B program, stating, “You have thousands of H-1B eligible workers who are just sitting overseas waiting for billable jobs to show up. That’s against the law. Nobody’s enforcing it.” He called for limitations on the types of organizations eligible for H-1B cap exemptions, arguing that these have been expanded too broadly. He also urged the Department of Homeland Security to overhaul the L-1 visa and optional practical training programs, which he noted have even fewer protections than the H-1B program.

He suggested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Department of Justice should investigate employment discrimination by auditing all mass H-1B employers and intervening in whistleblower lawsuits related to guest worker abuse.

Hira concluded by urging Congress to consider a broader transformation of the skilled immigration system in the U.S. “Our U.S. skilled immigration system has almost no immigration in it. It’s almost entirely guest worker programs,” he stated. He highlighted the disparity between the number of skilled guest workers and available green card slots, noting that there are about 1.5 million skilled guest workers competing for approximately 60,000 green card slots.

As discussions around immigration policy continue, Hira’s insights shed light on the complexities and challenges associated with the H-1B visa program, emphasizing the need for reform to protect both American and foreign workers.

Source: Original article

Ex-Pakistan Captain Azhar Ali Resigns from PCB Positions Citing Red Tape

Azhar Ali, the former captain of Pakistan’s Test cricket team, has stepped down from his roles within the Pakistan Cricket Board, citing bureaucratic challenges as a key reason for his departure.

Azhar Ali, who previously led the Pakistan Test cricket team, has officially resigned from his positions within the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB). His departure includes roles on the national selection committee and as the head of the youth development department at the National Cricket Academy.

Ali’s decision comes amid ongoing concerns regarding the bureaucratic processes within the PCB, which he has indicated have hindered effective decision-making and progress in his roles. The former captain’s resignation highlights the challenges faced by those involved in cricket administration in Pakistan.

His tenure in these positions was marked by a commitment to nurturing young talent and improving the overall structure of cricket in the country. However, the frustrations associated with red tape have ultimately led him to step away from these responsibilities.

Ali’s contributions to Pakistani cricket, both as a player and an administrator, have been significant. He has been a prominent figure in the sport, known for his leadership on the field and his dedication to developing the next generation of cricketers.

As the PCB continues to navigate its internal challenges, Ali’s resignation serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in cricket governance in Pakistan. His departure may prompt discussions about the need for reforms to streamline processes and enhance the effectiveness of cricket administration.

According to Source Name, the impact of Ali’s resignation may resonate beyond his immediate roles, potentially influencing future appointments and the overall direction of cricket management in the country.

Source: Original article

Ami Bera and Joe Wilson Strengthen U.S.-India Relations with Bipartisan Resolution

U.S. Representatives Ami Bera and Joe Wilson have introduced a bipartisan resolution to strengthen the strategic partnership between the United States and India, emphasizing cooperation across various sectors.

U.S. Representatives Ami Bera, M.D. (D-CA), the longest-serving Indian American Member of Congress, and Joe Wilson (R-SC) have introduced a bipartisan resolution that recognizes the strategic value of the historical partnership between the United States and India.

This resolution highlights decades of deepening cooperation between two of the world’s largest democracies across critical sectors, including defense, technology, trade, counterterrorism, and education. It also emphasizes India’s essential role in promoting regional stability, economic growth, and a free and open Indo-Pacific.

According to the resolution, “For more than three decades, it has been the policy of the United States under administrations of Presidents Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden to strengthen the strategic partnership with India, recognizing its importance to regional stability, democratic governance, economic growth, and shared regional priorities.”

The measure calls for continued collaboration between the United States and India to address 21st-century challenges, ranging from counterterrorism and cyber threats to emerging technologies. It also acknowledges the enduring people-to-people ties between the two nations, which are further strengthened by the Indian American diaspora.

The resolution has received robust bipartisan support, with a total of 24 original cosponsors. Notable supporters include Representatives Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA), Rich McCormick (R-GA), Deborah Ross (D-NC), Rob Wittman (R-VA), Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), James Moylan (R-GU), Brad Schneider (D-IL), Young Kim (R-CA), Sanford Bishop (D-GA), Buddy Carter (R-GA), Shri Thanedar (D-MI), David Schweikert (R-AZ), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Michael Baumgartner (R-WA), Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA), Bill Huizenga (R-MI), Brad Sherman (D-CA), Don Bacon (R-NE), Marc Veasey (D-TX), Andy Barr (R-KY), Ed Case (D-HI), and Jay Obernolte (R-CA).

The full text of the resolution is available for those interested in exploring its details further.

Source: Original article

Inclusivity Highlighted at Bengaluru Skill Summit 2025 for Indian Professionals

The Bengaluru Skill Summit 2025 highlighted the critical need for inclusivity in skill development, emphasizing that it should be integral to organizational systems rather than a mere checkbox exercise.

The Bengaluru Skill Summit 2025, held from November 4 to 6 at the Lalit Ashok, brought together key figures from various sectors to discuss the importance of inclusivity in skill development. Hosted by the Department of Skill Development, Entrepreneurship and Livelihood, the summit featured prominent ministers, entrepreneurs, and industry leaders.

During his keynote address, Dr. Sharanaprakash R. Patil, Karnataka’s minister for skill development, entrepreneurship, livelihood, and medical education, underscored the significance of inclusive skill development. “True progress is inclusive,” he stated, emphasizing the need for initiatives that reach rural youth, women, self-help groups, marginalized communities, persons with disabilities, and traditional artisans and craftsmen.

The following day, a panel discussion titled “Inclusive Skilling as the Next Growth Multiplier” featured experts including Dr. Gayathri Vasudevan, chief impact officer at the Sambhav Foundation; Giorgia A. Varisco, chief of YuWaah (Generation Unlimited India) at UNICEF India; Prateek Madhav, CEO and co-founder of AssisTech Foundation (ATF); and Veenu Jaichand, partner at EY. The panelists explored the dual nature of inclusivity as both a moral and economic imperative.

The discussion highlighted that increasing women’s participation in India’s workforce from 37% to 50% could significantly enhance economic growth. The panelists also addressed the exclusion of individuals with disabilities from formal employment sectors. “If we take a step to include people with disabilities, skill them, and give them an equal opportunity for employment, we are talking about a contribution of 5–7% of GDP as well,” Madhav noted.

Another panel, “Ecosystem Synergy — Driving Skills Innovation Through Collaboration,” focused on how partnerships among government, industry, academia, and social enterprises can advance skilling initiatives. Dr. Abhilasha Gaur, CEO of NASSCOM IT-ITeS SSC, spoke on the necessity of including women workers in efforts to future-proof the workforce. She also highlighted the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

The theme of inclusivity resurfaced during a subsequent panel discussion titled “Industry Voices: How Inclusion Matters for Business,” featuring Saraswathi Ramachandra, managing director of Lightcast India, and Dr. Padmini Ram, founding director of Urban Ethnographers. The panelists stressed that inclusivity should not be viewed as a checkbox exercise but rather as a fundamental aspect of organizational systems.

They argued that one-day workshops and token hiring measures are insufficient; instead, inclusion must be deeply embedded in workplace policies and culture to be effective.

The Bengaluru Skill Summit 2025 served as a vital platform for discussing the multifaceted benefits of inclusivity in skill development, reinforcing the idea that true progress requires comprehensive and sustained efforts.

Source: Original article

Trump Purchases $82 Million in Bonds Since Taking Office

President Donald Trump has reportedly invested at least $82 million in corporate and municipal bonds since taking office, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest.

President Donald Trump has made a series of notable financial investments during his time in office, with recent disclosures revealing that he purchased at least $82 million in corporate and municipal bonds between late August and early October 2025. These investments include sectors that may directly benefit from his administration’s policies.

The information was released by the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, detailing over 175 financial transactions conducted by Trump from August 28 to October 2. The disclosures, mandated by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, do not specify the exact amounts for each transaction but provide broad ranges. This lack of specificity means that the total value of his bond purchases could potentially reach as high as $337 million.

Among the bonds purchased are municipal securities issued by various state and local governments, including those from counties, school districts, and public utilities. These bonds are typically considered lower-risk investments, as they are used to fund local projects and are often tax-exempt at the federal level, and sometimes at the state and local levels if purchased in the investor’s home state. However, certain municipal bonds, such as private activity bonds, are taxable, and the tax-exempt status of these bonds has been a topic of political debate in 2025.

In contrast, corporate bonds, which are also part of Trump’s portfolio, are issued by companies to raise capital for various purposes, including expansion and operations. These bonds generally offer higher interest rates compared to municipal bonds, compensating for the increased credit risk associated with corporate debt. Interest income from corporate bonds is subject to taxation at both federal and state levels.

Notably, some of the corporate bonds acquired by Trump include offerings from well-known companies such as Broadcom and Qualcomm in the technology sector, as well as Meta Platforms, Home Depot, CVS Health, and major Wall Street banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. The selection of these investments has raised eyebrows among analysts and ethics observers, as some of these companies could potentially benefit from federal policies enacted during Trump’s presidency.

The scale and timing of these transactions have attracted scrutiny, as they are unusual for a sitting president. Observers have expressed concerns regarding the implications of such a significant fixed-income portfolio, which combines both municipal and corporate holdings. The potential for conflicts of interest, given the nature of the investments and their alignment with Trump’s policy initiatives, has become a focal point of discussion.

As the details of these financial activities continue to unfold, the intersection of Trump’s investments and his presidential duties remains a subject of interest and concern among the public and ethics watchdogs alike.

Source: Original article

Golden Toilet Scandal Puts Zelenskyy in Deepest Crisis Yet

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy faces a significant crisis as a corruption scandal involving his associates threatens his leadership amid ongoing war efforts against Russia.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is confronting one of the most challenging moments of his presidency following a corruption investigation that implicates members of his inner circle. This investigation has reportedly uncovered a scheme involving the embezzlement of approximately $100 million from Ukraine’s energy sector during the ongoing conflict with Russia.

According to a former government official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, the scandal has raised serious concerns about the morale of Ukrainians in their fight against Russian aggression. “Ukrainians don’t have any motivation to fight now because of enormous human rights violations and also because of this corruption now exposed,” the official stated.

The investigation, dubbed “Operation Midas” by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), has revealed allegations that associates of Zelenskyy have been involved in a scheme to siphon funds meant for energy projects designed to protect critical infrastructure during wartime. The former official claimed, “People inside the country are already seeing this corruption, and this is just part of the corrupt swamp. Zelenskyy is part of the problem.”

Since Russia’s invasion in 2022, scrutiny of Ukraine’s financial systems has intensified, with accusations that some individuals have been taking kickbacks from energy contracts. This situation has sparked public outrage and eroded trust in the government. The former official remarked, “This money laundering appeared to have been going on since 2022, and there were a lot of people who tried to stop this.” They further alleged that some believe Zelenskyy was aware of these schemes and may have even approved them.

In one prominent case, businessman Tymur Mindich, who co-owned the entertainment company Kvartal 95 with Zelenskyy, has been identified as a key figure in the alleged corruption. Reports indicate that investigators discovered bags of cash and a gold-plated toilet in one of Mindich’s apartments. The former official noted, “Tymur had an apartment with golden toilets that was in the same building as Zelenskyy’s, and in 2021, Zelenskyy celebrated his birthday in Tymur’s apartment.”

Another individual under investigation is Oleksiy Chernyshov, a former deputy prime minister with close ties to Zelenskyy’s family. Allegations against Chernyshov include abuse of office and the construction of several luxury homes in Kyiv. The former official claimed, “Chernyshov started building big, three or four huge houses in their most luxury place in Kyiv.”

In response to the unfolding scandal, Zelenskyy has publicly emphasized the need for accountability. During a recent address, he stated, “Everyone who put together a corrupt scheme must receive a clear legal response. There must be criminal verdicts.” He underscored the importance of maintaining integrity within the energy sector and pledged to keep Energoatom free from corruption.

Zelenskyy also commended the efforts of the Anti-Corruption Bureau, asserting, “Any effective actions against corruption are very needed. The inevitability of punishment is necessary.” However, the former official expressed skepticism about Zelenskyy’s commitment to accountability, suggesting that he is adept at managing public relations and unlikely to resign amid the investigation. “Zelenskyy is not the kind of person who feels shame even if there’s a corruption probe,” they claimed.

The former official also noted a shift in public sentiment, suggesting that many Ukrainians are increasingly supportive of former President Donald Trump, who they believe has influenced the narrative surrounding the war. “If not [for] Donald Trump, we would not be talking about peace today at all, and every day of war is destroying Ukraine,” they stated.

As the investigation continues, Zelenskyy’s administration faces mounting pressure to address the allegations and restore public trust in the government during a time of crisis.

Source: Original article

Missouri Senator Advocates Overhaul or End of OPT Work Program

Senator Eric Schmitt of Missouri is advocating for a comprehensive review of the Optional Practical Training program, calling it a “cheap-labor pipeline” that disadvantages American workers.

Senator Eric Schmitt, a Republican from Missouri, has formally requested a thorough review of the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, which permits international students graduating from U.S. universities to work in the country. In a letter addressed to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, Schmitt expressed his support for the agency’s reported plans to either reform or terminate the program.

The OPT program allows international graduates to work in the United States for up to twelve months after completing their degree, with those in STEM fields eligible for an additional twenty-four-month extension. However, the program has come under increasing scrutiny, particularly in the context of the Trump administration’s hardline stance on illegal immigration and employment-based visas like the H-1B. Once viewed as a relatively uncontroversial benefit for international students, OPT is now facing calls for reevaluation from policymakers who argue that any pathway allowing foreign graduates to work in the U.S. should be reconsidered under the “America First” immigration framework.

Schmitt, who was elected to the Senate in November 2022, highlighted that the OPT program was established administratively and lacks explicit congressional authorization. He contended that the program primarily serves the interests of large corporations and academic institutions while placing American workers at a disadvantage.

In his letter, Schmitt stated, “In light of your administration’s continued commitment to America First immigration policy, I write to you in strong support of ongoing discussions surrounding reforms to the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program.” He further noted that recent reports indicate DHS plans to overhaul or eliminate OPT, which he views as a necessary correction to a program he describes as one of the most abused in the U.S. immigration system.

The senator criticized the current state of the OPT program, asserting that it has deviated from its original purpose. He remarked, “Today, however, the program functions as a cheap-labor pipeline for big business—and a backdoor into the U.S. job market for foreign workers.” Schmitt emphasized that the OPT program serves the financial interests of large corporations and academic institutions at the expense of young American workers and students.

He elaborated on the negative impact of the program, stating, “This system boxes young Americans out of the workforce, discriminates against American workers in favor of foreign labor, and suppresses wages and job opportunities for U.S. graduates.” Schmitt also expressed concerns that the program distorts the higher education landscape, incentivizing colleges to operate as “visa mills” and posing threats to national security and economic prosperity.

Schmitt pointed out that the OPT program was created and expanded by unelected bureaucrats in the executive branch, circumventing the legislative process. He argued that this lack of congressional oversight means that the program could potentially be reformed or terminated through executive action.

The senator also highlighted the financial motivations for universities to promote work permits for foreign students, noting that these students often pay significantly higher tuition fees than their American counterparts. He stated, “As a result, many would argue that young Americans are being boxed out of both the workforce and the university system in their own country.”

Schmitt provided statistics to support his claims, noting that foreign students now make up 20 to 30 percent of total enrollment at many elite and public universities, with even higher percentages in graduate programs. For instance, he cited that last year, 39 percent of Columbia University’s student body was international, while nearly 44 percent of New York University’s enrollment fell into this category, representing a 244 percent increase since 2013.

In addition to his concerns about the OPT program, Schmitt has also voiced criticism regarding H-1B visas. He alleged that some U.S. companies are misusing these visas to staff diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) offices. He remarked on social media, “The H-1B visa was sold as a way to keep America ‘competitive.’ Instead, it imported millions of foreign nationals to replace American workers—and transferred entire industries into the hands of foreign lobbies.”

Schmitt’s advocacy for a review of the OPT program reflects a broader trend among lawmakers who are increasingly scrutinizing immigration policies and their implications for the American workforce.

Source: Original article

Britain Unveils Major Changes to Asylum Policies for Refugees

Britain has announced a significant overhaul of its asylum policy, inspired by Denmark’s stringent immigration measures, marking the most substantial changes to its refugee system in modern history.

Britain is set to implement a major overhaul of its asylum policy, introducing longer wait times for permanent residency and mandating the return of refugees to their home countries once deemed safe. This shift represents the largest transformation of asylum seeker policies in modern times, drawing inspiration from Denmark, which is known for its strict immigration regulations and has faced considerable scrutiny from human rights organizations.

The Labour government in Britain has intensified its immigration stance in response to the rising popularity of the populist Reform U.K. party, which advocates for a stringent approach to immigration. As a result, Labour has felt compelled to adopt a tougher position on asylum seekers.

Among the key changes announced by the Home Office are the revocation of the statutory duty to provide housing and financial support to certain asylum seekers. Additionally, refugees will now have to wait 20 years to apply for permanent residency, a significant increase from the current five-year period. The duration of initial refugee status will be reduced from five years to two and a half years, and the rules governing family reunifications will be tightened. Furthermore, refugees will be encouraged or required to return to their home countries once it is considered safe.

The Home Office indicated that these measures will apply to asylum seekers who are able to work but choose not to, as well as those who engage in illegal activities. Support funded by taxpayers will be prioritized for individuals who contribute positively to the economy and local communities.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood stated that the changes aim to make the United Kingdom less appealing to illegal migrants and facilitate the removal of individuals whose asylum claims are denied. “This country has a proud tradition of welcoming those fleeing danger, but our generosity is drawing illegal migrants across the Channel,” Mahmood remarked. “The pace and scale of migration is placing immense pressure on communities.”

In response to these proposed changes, more than 100 British charities have urged Mahmood to “end the scapegoating of migrants and performative policies that only cause harm.” They argue that these measures exacerbate racism and violence against vulnerable populations.

Britain’s Refugee Council emphasized on social media platform X that refugees do not compare asylum systems when fleeing danger. Many seek asylum in the U.K. due to family connections, some familiarity with the English language, or existing networks that can help them rebuild their lives safely.

As the U.K. government moves forward with these sweeping changes, the implications for asylum seekers and the broader community remain to be seen.

Source: Original article

President Donald Trump proposed $2000 checks to US Citizens

President Donald Trump shared exciting news on Nov. 9 about plans to give Americans outside the “high income” groups $2,000 each, funded from tariffs collected by his administration.

He expressed optimism on social media, saying, “We are taking in Trillions of Dollars and will soon begin paying down our ENORMOUS DEBT, $37 trillion. There’s been a record investment boom in the USA, with new plants and factories popping up everywhere. A bonus of at least $2000 per person (excluding those with high incomes!) will be paid to everyone.”

For this plan to move forward, it will need support from Congress. Back in July, Senator Josh Hawley introduced the American Worker Rebate Act, aiming to use tariff revenue to provide tax rebates of at least $600 for each adult and child, based on income.

According to the Treasury Department, in the first three quarters of 2025, the government collected $195 billion in customs duties — enough to give 97.5 million people a $2,000 check.

There were about 267 million adults living in the U.S. in 2024, according to 2020 Census estimates. Data from YouGov Profiles shows that roughly 18% of these adults earned more than $100,000 a year, which would mean they are not eligible for the dividend.

Currently, the average tariff rate for goods entering the U.S. stands at 18%, the highest since 1934, according to Yale’s Budget Lab. There’s ongoing debate about how much of these tariffs are passed on to consumers.

DHS Ends Automatic EAD Extensions, Impacting Indian-American Communities

A recent rule change by the Department of Homeland Security has left many visa-dependent professionals, particularly Indian women on H-4 EADs, facing uncertainty and potential job loss.

In a significant shift that has left many work-based visa holders in the United States anxious, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced late last week the termination of automatic extensions for employment authorization documents (EADs). This change affects most noncitizens who must file timely renewal applications to maintain their employment status in the country.

Under the new rule, noncitizens seeking to renew their EADs will no longer receive an automatic extension of their employment authorization or EAD validity while their renewal applications are being processed by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). DHS claims that this policy aims to improve screening and vetting processes to reassess an individual’s eligibility before extending their work authorization. However, experts argue that the ruling poses significant financial risks to individuals and could adversely impact the U.S. economy.

Immigration attorney Emily Neumann expressed her concerns, stating, “If proper vetting was actually the issue, why has USCIS been waiting until people renew their EADs to complete a screening? USCIS can review an alien’s background at any point. This just harms the people who are actually following the law and are not a security threat.”

The abrupt implementation of this rule, with only a 24-hour notice, has already begun to affect individuals on the ground. Mani S., a software professional on an H-4 EAD, shared her distress: “Both my H-4 and EAD extensions are filed. I received the receipt in September, a month before this ruling came in. But I am confused; even though I applied for an extension before the ruling date, my EAD has already expired. Does this mean I cannot work? I have been trying to seek opinions from legal experts, and I am told that I need to wait to get a new EAD card before I can start working. This means that one fine day I woke up to joblessness.”

Statistics indicate that a significant number of H-4 EAD holders are Indian women, who are directly impacted by this ruling. While some may overlook the contributions of immigrants to the American economy, immigration consultant Netra Chavan emphasizes the vital roles H-4 EAD holders play. “H-4 EAD holders are often more than just contributors to the workforce; many are passionate professionals dedicated to making a real difference. They can be self-employed, creating jobs, or serve their local community, filling essential gaps in America’s job market, like special needs teachers. Very often, they also drive scientific discoveries, advance technology in IT, and serve in countless other vital roles. Losing their ability to work abruptly wouldn’t just affect their careers; it would challenge employers to find similar replacements.”

As a result of this swift rule change, thousands of H-4 EAD holders are now left scrambling for clarity regarding their next steps. For those who require extensions in the near future, the specter of forced unemployment looms large. Srija K., who works in the tech sector, expressed her confusion: “The rule left me wondering, as my EAD is valid until May 2026, but my I-94 is valid until a later date. Does that mean I stop working once my EAD expires or my I-94? I quickly booked an online consultation with an attorney, and I was told that I can only work until my EAD expiration date. This means I need to plan now, because I may lose my ability to work next year. I hope it’s temporary, but with increased paperwork for the employer too, the situation becomes very precarious. Will they be willing to hold the work until their employee navigates the changing rules?”

DHS implemented this interim final rule without prior notice, public comment, or a delayed effective date, citing urgent national security and public safety reasons. The agency stated that immediate implementation is necessary to enhance the vetting and screening of foreign nationals and that the rule relates to immigration policy affecting foreign affairs. Consequently, DHS waived the usual 30-day waiting period, making the rule effective immediately.

For H-4 EAD holders who need an extension, Chavan advises, “As per USCIS’s ‘Check Case Processing Times,’ currently, for H-4 applicants filing with an EAD, 80% of cases are completed within four months. This applies to both the Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status (Form I-539) at Service Center Operations (SCOPS) and to the Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765) filed alone, indicating relatively swift processing for the majority of applicants.”

She adds, “If an H-4 applicant files their H-4 extension and/or EAD renewal up to 180 days before the current status or EAD expires, they are already taking the recommended steps to avoid any employment gaps. In that case, the new DHS rule ending automatic extensions starting October 30, 2025, should not directly affect them, because their work authorization will continue as long as USCIS adjudicates the timely-filed applications while maintaining valid underlying status.”

However, complications arise if USCIS processing times extend beyond the expiration of the EAD for H-4 holders, potentially leading to unintended employment gaps. Chavan notes, “In such cases, applicants may need to challenge the ended rule in court or seek administrative relief, presenting themselves as impacted parties to argue for reinstatement of automatic extensions or other remedies to protect their ability to work legally.”

Source: Original article

Over 100,000 South Asian Families Face Job Loss After EAD Changes

More than 100,000 South Asian families face potential job loss as the Department of Homeland Security eliminates the 540-day automatic extension for Employment Authorization Documents (EAD).

On Thursday, a significant change in immigration policy was announced that has left many South Asian families in distress. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has officially removed the 540-day automatic extension for Employment Authorization Documents (EAD), a lifeline that many had relied upon to maintain their employment status while waiting for renewals.

This decision, effective October 30, 2025, means that any EAD renewal filed on or after this date will not receive any grace period. As a result, if an individual’s EAD card expires, their job is at risk, along with their family’s financial stability and future plans.

The 540-day extension was initially introduced to alleviate the burden on legal workers, particularly those from South Asian countries such as India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka, as well as others from around the world. This policy was championed by advocates who aimed to “Save 1 Million Families” by extending the auto-renewal period from 180 to 540 days. The extension was signed into law on May 3, 2022, and had provided crucial support to approximately 1.2 million legal workers while the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) processed their applications.

However, the recent decision by the DHS has left many individuals anxious about their futures. A software engineer from Hyderabad, a nurse from Kerala, a data scientist from Colombo, and an ERP developer from Dhaka have all reached out with the same urgent concern: “If USCIS takes eight months to process my renewal, will I lose my job, my health insurance, and my child’s school?” The unfortunate answer is yes, unless they filed their renewal before the October 30 deadline.

Among those affected are over 100,000 Indian H-4 spouses, recent OPT STEM graduates from prestigious institutions, and Nepali TPS nurses who played a vital role in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of this policy change is not just theoretical; it translates into real financial losses for families. For instance, if a card expires on March 1, 2026, and an application is filed on November 3, 2025, the average processing time of 7.5 months could result in a gap of 106 days without income, amounting to a staggering loss of nearly $30,000 for a single family. When multiplied across 100,000 households, this could mean a total economic impact of approximately $3 billion.

The implications of this policy change extend beyond immediate job loss. Families may face severe financial strain as mortgages stall, children may have to switch schools, and remittances to aging parents in their home countries could dry up. Additionally, many individuals may find their driver’s licenses expiring, as these are often tied to EAD status in 17 states. Employment gaps could also jeopardize green card applications, leading to potential denials based on “public charge” criteria.

In light of these challenges, advocates are urging affected individuals to take immediate action. They recommend filing the I-765 application online as soon as possible, as waiting until the previous timeline of 180 days early is no longer sufficient. Individuals are encouraged to document their application receipt and communicate with their employers about potential unpaid leave. Financial planning is also critical, with suggestions to save at least three months’ worth of expenses in a separate account designated for EAD gaps.

Despite the grim outlook, there remains a thread of hope. The USCIS still has 22,000 unused H-1B visas available this year, and there are bipartisan efforts in Congress to address the backlog of applications. Community support continues to be a vital resource, with many South Asian volunteers coming together to provide assistance and solidarity during these trying times.

As families navigate this new reality, it is crucial to remain proactive and connected. The immigrant community has historically shown resilience in the face of adversity, and this situation is no different. By filing early, planning carefully, and leaning on community networks, families can work to protect their futures one renewal at a time.

Source: Original article

India Introduces AI Governance Guidelines for Responsible Innovation

India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has introduced new AI Governance Guidelines aimed at fostering innovation while ensuring responsible use of artificial intelligence.

On November 5, 2025, India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) unveiled a set of new AI Governance Guidelines designed to promote a hands-off regulatory model for artificial intelligence. This updated framework marks a shift from earlier drafts that primarily focused on minimizing risks associated with AI technologies. Instead, the revised guidelines emphasize the importance of fostering innovation through balanced guardrails that do not impede the adoption of AI.

Under the leadership of Balaraman Ravindran from IIT Madras, these guidelines were developed following the establishment of a committee in July. They outline seven key principles that will guide the governance of AI: trust, people-centricity, responsible innovation, equity, accountability, understandability of large language models (LLMs), and safety, resilience, and sustainability.

This approach reflects India’s commitment to enabling widespread integration of AI across various industries while ensuring its ethical and responsible use. Abhishek Singh, Additional Secretary at MeitY, emphasized that the guidelines aim to set a global benchmark for AI governance. The framework includes recommendations to expand access to AI infrastructure, leverage digital public infrastructure for scalability and inclusion, and enhance AI capacity through education and skill development programs.

Moreover, the guidelines advocate for agile and balanced regulatory measures tailored to address India-specific risks, while promoting transparency and accountability throughout the AI ecosystem. This comprehensive strategy aims to create an environment conducive to innovation while safeguarding public interests.

The guidelines propose a phased implementation strategy, which includes short-term goals to establish governance institutions and enhance the availability of AI safety tools. Medium-term actions focus on updating existing laws, operationalizing AI incident management for cybersecurity, and integrating AI with digital infrastructure such as Aadhaar. Long-term plans involve drafting new legislation that is responsive to the evolving capabilities and risks associated with AI technologies.

IT Secretary S. Krishnan noted that while there are currently no immediate plans for an AI-specific law, the government is prepared to take swift action should the need arise. This proactive stance underscores the government’s commitment to ensuring that AI development aligns with the nation’s interests and ethical standards.

Launched in anticipation of the Delhi AI Impact Summit scheduled for February 2026, this framework aims to position India as a leading hub for responsible AI innovation. It seeks to balance growth with necessary safeguards that protect individuals and society as a whole. The holistic governance architecture includes key bodies such as the AI Governance Group, the Technology and Policy Expert Committee, and the AI Safety Institute, which will ensure a coordinated government approach for effective oversight and continuous improvement.

The introduction of these guidelines represents a significant step forward in India’s journey toward harnessing the potential of AI while maintaining a strong commitment to ethical standards and responsible practices. By establishing a clear framework for AI governance, India aims to encourage innovation while safeguarding the interests of its citizens and society.

Source: Original article

Enforcement Directorate Seizes Anil Ambani Group Properties Worth Over Rs 3,000 Crore

The Enforcement Directorate has provisionally attached over 40 properties linked to the Anil Ambani-led Reliance Group, with a total value exceeding Rs 3,000 crore.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has taken significant action against the Anil Ambani-led Reliance Group by provisionally attaching more than 40 properties, including the well-known Pali Hill residence in Mumbai. The total estimated value of these assets exceeds Rs 3,000 crore.

These properties are located in several major cities across India, including Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Mumbai, Pune, Thane, Hyderabad, Chennai, Kancheepuram, and East Godavari. The attached assets comprise a diverse mix of office spaces, residential units, and land parcels, amounting to approximately Rs 3,084 crore.

This enforcement action is part of a broader investigation into allegations of money laundering and the diversion of public funds raised by Reliance Home Finance Ltd (RHFL) and Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd (RCFL). Between 2017 and 2019, Yes Bank invested nearly Rs 5,000 crore into these companies, which subsequently became non-performing assets, resulting in dues exceeding Rs 3,300 crore.

The investigation has unveiled a complex mechanism allegedly designed to bypass regulatory norms. It was discovered that public funds invested in the former Reliance Nippon Mutual Fund were funneled through Yes Bank to various Anil Ambani Group firms. This maneuver sidestepped the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (SEBI) conflict-of-interest regulations, which prohibit mutual funds from investing directly in affiliated companies.

As part of its financial investigation, the ED has identified serious lapses in the loan processing procedures of these companies. Findings indicate that loans were processed rapidly without adhering to standard checks, with disbursements occurring before formal approvals. Additionally, many loan applications were found to be incomplete, with critical fields left blank, overwritten, or undated, highlighting systematic failures in control mechanisms.

The ED has also intensified its scrutiny of the Reliance Communications Ltd (RCOM) loan fraud case, where it is alleged that over Rs 13,600 crore have been diverted. The agency continues to trace the proceeds of these crimes and is actively pursuing asset recovery efforts aimed at benefiting the public.

According to Global Net News, the ED’s actions reflect a significant escalation in its efforts to address financial irregularities associated with the Reliance Group.

Source: Original article

Congressional Leaders, Including Ami Bera, Call for Reconsideration of H-1B Restrictions

U.S. lawmakers, including Representative Ami Bera, are urging President Trump to reconsider recent restrictions on H-1B visas, citing potential negative impacts on the economy and U.S.-India relations.

In a recent letter to President Donald Trump, U.S. Representative Jimmy Panetta, along with Congressmen Ami Bera, Salud Carbajal, Derek Tran, and Congresswoman Julie Johnson, has called for the reversal of the September 19 Proclamation that limits H-1B visas. The bipartisan group of lawmakers expressed concern that these restrictions could adversely affect the relationship between the United States and India, as well as diminish America’s competitive advantage in technology and innovation.

Representative Ami Bera, a senior Indian American member of Congress and a long-time proponent of stronger ties between the U.S. and India, underscored the importance of H-1B professionals in bolstering the U.S. technology sector. “Our economy thrives on global talent and innovation,” Bera stated. He cautioned that restrictive visa policies could jeopardize both American leadership in the tech industry and the partnership with India.

Panetta shared similar sentiments, describing the H-1B program as essential for maintaining America’s leadership in technological innovation, particularly in light of the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence. He noted that nearly 75 percent of current H-1B recipients originate from India and urged the administration to expand the program rather than restrict it to foster continued growth in high-tech industries.

The lawmakers highlighted that many of the most successful companies in America were founded or led by individuals who were once H-1B visa holders. These entrepreneurs continue to contribute to job creation and economic development across the country. They argued that limiting visa availability would negatively impact local economies, particularly in areas with significant Indian American and immigrant populations that play a vital role in civic and economic life.

This appeal comes in the wake of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’s recent decision to prohibit H-1B hiring at state universities, as well as new guidance from the Department of Homeland Security regarding application fee adjustments. Despite these developments, the White House has reiterated that President Trump’s priority remains “putting American workers first.” This stance continues amid ongoing legal challenges from business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, regarding the visa restrictions.

As the debate over H-1B visa policies unfolds, the implications for the tech industry and U.S.-India relations remain a focal point for lawmakers advocating for a more inclusive approach to immigration that supports innovation and economic growth.

Source: Original article

US Government Shutdown Halts H-1B Visa Filings, Impacting Indian Applicants

As the U.S. government shutdown continues, thousands of overseas technology professionals, particularly from India, are facing significant disruptions in H-1B visa processes and job security.

The ongoing U.S. government shutdown, now in its fifth week, has left thousands of overseas technology professionals grappling with uncertainty over stalled visa processes and potential job disruptions. Many of those affected are Indian nationals, who comprise over 70% of all H-1B visa holders in the United States.

With key federal departments unable to process Labour Condition Applications (LCAs)—the first step in H-1B filings—immigration attorneys are warning that the shutdown has effectively frozen both visa renewals and new petitions. This situation has deepened anxiety for skilled workers and their employers alike.

“Labor Condition Application (LCA) processing has stopped, forcing clients to halt H-1B filings,” said Matthew Minor, a partner at Corporate Immigration Partners based in Cincinnati. The LCA is a required certification from the Department of Labor (DOL) that employers must complete before hiring foreign professionals under H-1B, H-1B1, or E-3 categories.

With the DOL’s operations stalled, even routine applications are at a standstill. “This effectively halts all H-1B filings—new, change of employer, extension, or amendment,” noted Helene Dang, a Houston-based immigration lawyer and partner at Foster LLP. The disruption has left both companies and workers in a state of limbo.

The impact of the shutdown is particularly severe for Indian nationals, who are facing stalled career moves, delayed project starts, and growing anxiety over maintaining lawful status while their paperwork remains stuck in the system. “The problems facing H-1B workers from India are the same, regardless of which state they work in—petitions cannot be filed now because the shutdown has prevented LCAs from being processed,” explained Richard T. Herman, an immigration attorney based in Cleveland.

The shutdown has also disrupted the DOL’s core responsibilities, including certifying LCAs and determining prevailing wages—both essential steps for H-1B visa processing and employment-based green card applications. While the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) continues to operate, employers cannot proceed with filings until their LCAs are approved by the DOL.

According to Dang, the USCIS notice allowing for flexibility in late or incomplete filings under “extraordinary circumstances” offers limited comfort. “It is discretionary—meaning it is not guaranteed,” she said, emphasizing that employers and workers remain at the mercy of unpredictable timelines.

In the current climate, where Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been actively enforcing removal powers, relying on this exception is causing significant anxiety for many H-1B workers. They are faced with the difficult choice of either departing the United States or overstaying their authorized period of stay, as noted by Becki Young, founding partner of Grossman Young & Hammond.

The ramifications of the shutdown extend beyond visa paperwork, impacting both livelihoods and business operations. “Moreover, these workers must be removed from payroll until a new H-1B petition can be filed, which disrupts U.S. business and leaves the workers without a paycheck while the shutdown is ongoing,” Young added.

Herman cautioned that the effects of the shutdown may linger well beyond the immediate crisis. “I am hearing of more companies deciding to cease immigration sponsorship in the future—whether H-1B or green card,” he said, noting that the uncertainty has made many employers hesitant to rely on foreign talent amid ongoing policy disruptions.

As the uncertainty deepens, some affected professionals are exploring alternative immigration pathways. Clients are considering options such as the EB-5 investor or EB-1C categories, according to Herman. “Some are also looking at Canada and other countries,” he added.

Unlike the H-1B, which is a temporary visa for specialized workers, the EB-5 program offers a path to permanent residency for investors who create jobs in the U.S. Similarly, the EB-1C visa allows multinational companies to transfer senior executives or managers to their U.S. operations—options that are increasingly appealing amid the ongoing freeze.

The federal shutdown, which began on October 1 after lawmakers failed to reach a funding agreement, has also stalled progress for employment-based green card applicants who depend on the DOL for crucial certifications. Geetha N. Adinata, an immigration attorney based in Los Angeles, warned that the resulting delays could cause serious setbacks for those nearing the end of their visa validity. Without timely submission of the labor market test, known as the PERM application, workers risk falling out of status.

As the situation continues to evolve, the future remains uncertain for many skilled workers navigating the complexities of U.S. immigration policy.

Source: Original article

Viral Energy Booster Sparks Division Among Doctors: What to Know

Experts weigh in on CoQ10 supplements, highlighting their potential benefits for energy and heart health while cautioning against misconceptions and emphasizing the importance of medical guidance.

Coenzyme Q10, commonly referred to as CoQ10, has gained popularity as a supplement believed to enhance energy levels and support heart health. However, the actual benefits may not align with the high expectations many have for this compound.

CoQ10 is a natural substance found in every cell of the body, where it plays a crucial role in converting food into usable energy. Additionally, it functions as an antioxidant, protecting cells from damage caused by daily wear and tear. As people age, CoQ10 levels tend to decline, and certain medications may further reduce these levels. Consequently, many individuals turn to CoQ10 supplements, which are often marketed for various health benefits, including heart health, energy enhancement, muscle recovery, and even cognitive protection.

Before adding CoQ10 to your health regimen, it is essential to consider the insights provided by cardiologists and health experts. According to the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), while CoQ10 is important for bodily functions, the clinical evidence supporting its ability to prevent or treat diseases remains inconclusive. Some studies indicate that CoQ10 may help lower blood pressure slightly or alleviate fatigue associated with cholesterol-lowering medications. However, large-scale, well-designed trials have yet to confirm significant benefits for conditions such as Parkinson’s disease or heart disease.

Despite the uncertainty surrounding its effectiveness, experts generally agree that CoQ10 is safe for most individuals. The primary side effects reported are mild, including upset stomach and insomnia. However, the NCCIH warns that CoQ10 can interact with certain medications, particularly blood thinners and insulin, necessitating caution.

Cardiologists express interest in CoQ10 but remain cautious. A 2022 press release from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) identified CoQ10 as one of several micronutrients potentially linked to reduced cardiovascular risk and a decrease in all-cause mortality. Nonetheless, the ACC emphasized the need for more high-quality studies before recommending CoQ10 universally.

One of the reasons for caution is that CoQ10 may help relax blood vessels, which can lead to lower-than-expected blood pressure in some individuals. Unlike prescription medications, dietary supplements are not strictly regulated by the FDA, meaning the amount of CoQ10 in each capsule can vary significantly between brands. To ensure quality and purity, it is advisable to choose products that have undergone third-party testing, such as those bearing the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) seal.

CoQ10 is fat-soluble, which means it is best absorbed when taken with a meal containing healthy fats. The National Institutes of Health recommends a daily intake of between 100 mg and 200 mg for most individuals, although it is wise to consult with a healthcare provider to determine the appropriate dosage for your specific needs.

While experts agree that CoQ10 is generally safe and may offer some benefits, they caution against viewing it as a miracle solution. Individuals with heart failure or frequent migraines may experience positive effects from the supplement, but it is crucial to discuss its use with a healthcare professional first.

For those seeking to improve heart health, experts continue to advocate for a comprehensive approach that includes regular exercise, a balanced diet, and care supervised by a medical professional.

Source: Original article

Domestic Violence Among Indian-Americans: Understanding the Dynamics of Control

Domestic violence is a pervasive issue that transcends cultural boundaries, affecting individuals and families across various communities, particularly within South Asian immigrant populations.

“Although I wish I had recognised the abuse earlier, talking to someone openly and honestly about what I have experienced helps me understand that I am not to blame,” shared an anonymous domestic violence survivor.

Domestic violence (DV) occurs when one partner exerts control over the other through physical, emotional, psychological, or sexual abuse. While the abuser may often be perceived as the “bad person,” the reality is that both partners, along with their children, are deeply affected by the dynamics of violence.

At its core, domestic violence violates the fundamental human right to live safely and free from harm. It is the responsibility of individuals and society as a whole to recognize, intervene, and protect this right. Without timely intervention, the psychological and emotional consequences can be devastating, leading to isolation, depression, and long-lasting trauma.

Common assumptions often portray domestic violence as primarily a husband’s abuse of his wife. However, this stereotype fails to capture the full spectrum of the issue. Men can also be silent victims, and abuse can occur in both heterosexual and same-sex relationships. Therefore, it is crucial to assess domestic violence without bias, paying attention to the subtle dynamics at play.

Within the Indian immigrant population in the U.S., domestic violence presents particularly complex challenges. Studies indicate that South Asian women, including Indian immigrants, report alarmingly high rates of domestic violence, with lifetime prevalence as high as 77%. This violence manifests in various forms—physical, emotional, and sexual abuse—while intersecting with cultural, social, and economic realities.

The repercussions of domestic violence extend beyond individual victims, reverberating through families and communities and creating long-lasting hardship. The impact often destabilizes family structures and strains social systems, affecting not only the immediate victims but also those around them.

Perhaps the most concerning aspect is the intergenerational transmission of trauma. Children who witness or grow up in violent households often internalize these patterns, normalizing violence in their own relationships as they mature. This normalization can leave them vulnerable to anxiety, confusion, and difficulties with emotional regulation.

In this way, domestic violence evolves from a personal issue into a societal one, perpetuating cycles of harm across generations. To break this cycle, it is essential to raise awareness through education and community campaigns that highlight both the immediate and long-term societal consequences of domestic violence. Such efforts can foster understanding, reduce stigma, and encourage individuals and families to seek support before patterns of violence become deeply entrenched.

Several factors contribute to the prevalence of domestic violence, particularly within South Asian communities. Traditional gender roles and patriarchal structures often create expectations that women must bear the full burden of domestic and emotional labor, while men position themselves as primary providers. This dynamic can be exacerbated by a “scarcity mindset” carried from India, where financial insecurity looms large, leading to projected fears about unemployment or loss of income onto spouses.

Household dynamics can also shift drastically after immigration. In India, many families rely on domestic help, but in the U.S., couples are expected to manage housework themselves. This expectation can lead to frustration, especially when one partner feels unsupported or unacknowledged.

Financial dependency adds another layer of vulnerability. Among Indian immigrants, it is common for one partner to be on a dependent visa, legally barred from working until granted a permit. This dependency can heighten power imbalances and foster resentment within the marriage.

Acculturation stress further complicates the situation. When one partner has adapted to life in the U.S. while the other is newly arrived, the couple may find themselves caught in conflict, struggling between traditional values and the pressures of Western norms.

Isolation from extended family also plays a significant role. Being far from relatives can leave many without a social safety net, intensifying feelings of loneliness and despair. Unfortunately, stigma and shame surrounding therapy often prevent couples from addressing these issues in a timely manner.

A clinical example illustrates the profound impact of domestic violence on children. During a counseling placement at an elementary school, a second grader named Jay (name changed for privacy) began acting out in disruptive and aggressive ways. His teacher described him as loud and uncontrollable, often physically aggressive toward peers.

Initially, Jay presented as cheerful during sessions, but through play therapy, he began to reveal more about his inner world. Using figurines, he reenacted scenes of conflict between a couple, sharing that he could hear his parents fighting at home. Although his parents believed they were arguing quietly, Jay was still able to perceive the tension and hostility, leaving him confused about his perceptions. His bottled-up frustration and helplessness surfaced in his behavior at school.

When this issue was addressed collaboratively with his parents and teacher, Jay’s classroom behavior improved, and his parents sought couples therapy to enhance their communication. This case serves as a vivid reminder that children, even when not directly targeted, absorb the emotional violence around them and often carry it into their own relationships.

Domestic violence is not merely a private matter between partners; it is a cultural and intergenerational issue that requires careful, culturally sensitive intervention. Within South Asian immigrant communities, therapists and professionals must recognize the unique stressors of immigration, financial dependency, and acculturation while validating the universal right of every individual to safety and respect.

Domestic violence should be reframed not as a matter of shame but as an urgent social and psychological concern. Seeking help is both necessary and courageous. Addressing domestic violence openly can prevent the silent transmission of trauma across generations and pave the way toward healthier, more respectful relationships.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Couples Celebrate Timeless Love Across Generations

Many individuals grapple with the belief that romance has an expiration date, but love can flourish at any stage of life, as explored in Monica Saigal’s novel, A Kiss in Kashmir.

“Is it too late for me?” This question often echoes in the hearts of many, especially those who have experienced divorce or widowhood. As a matchmaker and relationship coach working with Indian men and women aged 20 to over 70, I frequently encounter this quiet yet persistent worry. However, my experience has shown me that love is indeed attainable at any stage of life.

This belief inspired me to connect with author Monica Saigal about her novel, A Kiss in Kashmir. Her book has ignited conversations across generations about love later in life, the myths we grow up with, the influence of family on our choices, and the courage required to embrace joy once again.

In our discussion, I asked Saigal what motivated her to write A Kiss in Kashmir.

“I grew up on Bollywood, and I still love it,” she shared. “But it instilled in me the belief that there’s only one soulmate. If you lose that person, your story is over. After my own divorce following 23 years of marriage, I was nearly fifty and heard that same message: ‘It’s over for you now. Dedicate yourself to God. Focus only on your children.’ This notion felt wrong to me. I wanted to craft a story that breaks that myth—that love can arrive at any age, and we have the right to define what that looks like for ourselves.”

When I asked her why a romance between older adults was significant, she responded, “Because it’s real. Life doesn’t stop at forty or fifty. Yet literature and pop culture often suggest that it does. During my grief, I sought stories that demonstrated there’s always room for second chances—that being widowed or divorced doesn’t mean love is off the table. I wanted to provide readers with a reflection of hope, showing that beauty, passion, and companionship can begin anew.”

Saigal noted that readers have indeed connected with the theme of second chances. “At book clubs, many older readers expressed how much they needed to hear this message. Some admitted they were in love again but felt guilty about it. Others feared their adult children wouldn’t support them. The biggest surprise? In many cases, the children actually wanted their parents to be happy. They encouraged, ‘Go for it.’ This has been both moving and healing for me as a mother of two grown boys who urged me to start dating again.”

When I inquired about the message she hopes readers take away from A Kiss in Kashmir, Saigal emphasized, “That love is not a one-time lottery ticket. It doesn’t expire. The real lesson is that it should be our choice—whether we want to be single, married, partnered, or not. No one else gets to write the ending of our story. Life will throw us curveballs—mine certainly did—but we get to decide how to catch them.”

Reflecting on her own journey, Saigal shared, “I never imagined I’d be divorced. I never thought I’d be starting over. But here I am. Instead of letting that break me, I turned grief into love—not just romantic love, but love for life itself. That’s the heart of A Kiss in Kashmir: resilience, hope, and the spark that propels us forward.”

For those who may feel guilty about wanting romance after a long marriage or widowhood, Saigal advises, “You don’t have to apologize for wanting love. I’ve met many people who confided in me that they were dating again or secretly in love but carried guilt as if finding happiness a second time was shameful. That’s simply not true. Love is not a betrayal of the past; it’s a celebration of being alive. You can honor your history and still open yourself to new chapters.”

When asked what advice she would give to someone who believes they are “too old” for love, Saigal asserted, “Love has no expiration date. It doesn’t end at forty or fifty, or after a divorce, or after widowhood. If you desire romance, companionship, or simply the joy of possibility, you have every right to pursue it. Don’t let society’s timeline dictate your heart’s timeline. It’s never too late to feel alive again.”

Monica Saigal’s insights serve as a powerful reminder that love is not constrained by age, history, or circumstance. Whether we are in our thirties or seventies, divorced, widowed, or never married, the desire for connection is a fundamental aspect of being human—and the potential for it never fades. What I admire about A Kiss in Kashmir is how it normalizes the hopes many harbor quietly: that new beginnings can be just as profound as first ones.

As someone who helps individuals navigate these journeys daily, I can confidently say—your story isn’t finished until you decide it is.

Source: Original article

Kim Kardashian’s Health Scare: Doctors Warn of Aneurysm Symptoms

Kim Kardashian recently revealed that a brain aneurysm was discovered during an MRI scan, prompting experts to discuss the condition’s causes, symptoms, and treatment options.

Kim Kardashian has opened up about a recent health scare involving a brain aneurysm. The 45-year-old Skims founder shared the news in a preview clip for Season 7 of Hulu’s “The Kardashians,” where she informed her family, “There was a little aneurysm.” While the exact cause of the aneurysm remains unidentified, Kardashian’s doctors have suggested that stress may be a contributing factor.

A brain aneurysm occurs when a blood vessel in the brain balloons, which can lead to leakage or rupture, resulting in bleeding. According to the Mayo Clinic, this condition can be serious and potentially life-threatening. Dr. Adam Arthur, chairman of neurosurgery at the University of Tennessee, explained that an aneurysm represents a weakness in the wall of an artery, likening it to a small water balloon forming off a hose. If an aneurysm ruptures, it can lead to a hemorrhagic stroke, which can have devastating consequences.

Dr. Arthur noted that while most aneurysms are small and do not pose a significant risk if they remain unruptured, they are more prevalent in women. He indicated that genetics may play a role in this disparity, stating, “There’s so much about the brain and about genetics that we don’t understand.” It is estimated that aneurysms are present in approximately one in every 50 individuals, and many do not require treatment.

When an aneurysm becomes problematic, it can cause a sudden stroke, often characterized by what patients describe as “the worst headache of their life.” Dr. Arthur elaborated on this symptom, describing it as a “very abnormal headache, often behind the eye.” He expressed relief that Kardashian’s aneurysm was discovered before it could lead to a stroke, calling it “a blessing.”

Several factors can increase the likelihood of aneurysm formation. These include binge drinking, exposure to nicotine, certain genetic conditions, and the use of drugs such as cocaine and methamphetamine. Dr. Arthur emphasized that drugs and nicotine can adversely affect blood vessel health, contributing to aneurysm growth and rupture. Chronic stress has also been linked to the condition, highlighting the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle that includes adequate sleep, a balanced diet, and regular exercise.

Understanding family history is crucial when it comes to aneurysms. Dr. Arthur recommends that individuals with two close relatives who have experienced aneurysms should consider undergoing screening exams, such as MRIs.

While some aneurysms can lead to sudden fatal strokes, those experiencing symptoms—particularly intense headaches—should seek medical attention to explore treatment options. If an aneurysm is detected before it ruptures, minimally invasive surgery may be performed to prevent a stroke. Alternatively, open surgery can be conducted, where a surgeon can pinch the aneurysm shut through an incision along the hairline.

For older patients with smaller aneurysms, monitoring by a physician is often the preferred approach to ensure that the aneurysm does not grow or cause further complications. “We do have ways of fixing aneurysms now that are pretty remarkable,” Dr. Arthur stated. He explained that medical professionals can place a metal mesh over the opening of the aneurysm or fill it with a device, allowing the body to form a clot and scar tissue over time.

Stroke remains the leading cause of disability in the United States, with Dr. Arthur noting that it “disables way more people than it outright kills.” This underscores the importance of awareness and early detection of brain aneurysms.

Fox News Digital’s Christina Dugan Ramirez contributed to this report. Fox News Digital reached out to Kardashian for comment.

Source: Original article

Paul Kapur Sworn In as Indian-American Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asia

Paul Kapur has been sworn in as the Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs, marking a significant appointment within the Biden administration.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Indian-American security expert Paul Kapur has officially been sworn in as the Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs. This appointment is seen as a pivotal move for the Biden administration regarding its focus on the region.

The State Department’s Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs announced Kapur’s swearing-in on October 22 via a post on X, stating, “Welcome to @State_SCA, Assistant Secretary Paul Kapur! This morning Dr. Kapur was officially sworn in as the Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs.”

Kapur takes over the role from Donald Lu, who served as Assistant Secretary from September 2021 until January 2025. His extensive background includes a tenure on the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff from 2020 to 2021, where he focused on issues pertinent to South and Central Asia, the Indo-Pacific strategy, and India-U.S. relations.

In addition to his government service, Kapur is a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution and a professor at the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. His academic and professional experiences have positioned him as a key figure in U.S. diplomatic efforts in the region.

Kapur was confirmed by the Senate in early October, alongside the new U.S. Ambassador to India, Sergio Gor. During his Senate confirmation hearing in June, he expressed a sense of personal fulfillment in his new role, stating, “My career has come full circle,” reflecting on his academic studies of the region and his current diplomatic responsibilities.

Born in New Delhi to an Indian father and an American mother, Kapur shared his unique perspective on his upbringing. “Although I visited India often during my childhood, I grew up in the United States as a thoroughly American kid, never imagining that my career would someday return me to the place where I was born,” he remarked.

On the topic of U.S.-India relations, Kapur emphasized the shared interests between the two nations. “The United States and India share a host of common interests: ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific region, which is not dominated by China; expanding bilateral trade; building our economic relationship so that it is more symmetrical and profitable; facilitating technology sharing and innovation; and ensuring access to the energy necessary to fuel our economies,” he noted.

Regarding Pakistan, he indicated a willingness to engage in security cooperation when it aligns with U.S. interests. His approach reflects the bureau’s critical role in shaping U.S. policy on security, economic engagement, counterterrorism, and infrastructure development across the broader South and Central Asia region.

Kapur’s appointment is expected to influence U.S. strategies and relationships in South and Central Asia, particularly as the region continues to evolve in the context of global geopolitical dynamics.

Source: Original article

Salesforce Proposes Streamlined Hiring Process for Immigration Officers at ICE

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff faces criticism after proposing the use of the company’s AI technology to assist ICE in recruiting immigration officers and enhancing deportation efforts.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff is under fire following reports that he proposed leveraging the company’s artificial intelligence technology to support the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in its recruitment and deportation initiatives.

Internal documents obtained by The New York Times reveal that Benioff suggested using Salesforce’s AI capabilities to help ICE recruit 10,000 new agents and streamline the agency’s deportation processes. The materials included a five-page memo, a spreadsheet outlining potential opportunities with ICE, and slides detailing how AI could assist in processing tip-line reports and investigations. Salesforce confirmed the authenticity of these documents but refrained from providing detailed comments, citing the confidential nature of its contracts.

This revelation is likely to provoke further controversy among San Francisco’s liberal community, which has already expressed discontent with Benioff’s previous comments advocating for the deployment of the National Guard to address crime, drug issues, and homelessness in the city.

At this week’s Dreamforce conference, which concluded Thursday at the Moscone Center with nearly 50,000 attendees, Benioff did not address questions regarding his comments on ICE or the National Guard. His earlier endorsement of using National Guard troops to enhance public safety had already drawn criticism prior to the conference.

During a session at Dreamforce, Benioff emphasized the importance of safety, stating, “The number one thing that’s on my mind is safety. It’s all about trust and safety — it’s our highest value here.”

The U.S. government is Salesforce’s largest client, with various agencies, including the Army, Coast Guard, and Veterans Affairs, utilizing the company’s products. While Salesforce has previously collaborated with ICE under both the Obama and Biden administrations, its recent proposal to assist in scaling up enforcement operations marks a significant shift in its approach.

Benioff has positioned himself as a strong supporter of San Francisco, pledging billions to the city, including a commitment of $15 billion over the next five years. On Thursday, he also announced a $1 million donation to the San Francisco Police Department.

Salesforce’s involvement with ICE is not an isolated case among Bay Area tech firms. Recently, the White House hosted a summit with executives from OpenAI, Google, Oracle, Apple, and Meta to discuss potential collaborations on artificial intelligence and other federal technology initiatives.

The actions of Salesforce and other tech giants in Silicon Valley highlight the growing intersection between technology companies and federal policymaking. As discussions around public safety, AI regulation, and federal partnerships intensify, these engagements illustrate how influential tech leaders are shaping national priorities while navigating scrutiny and opportunities in the political landscape.

Source: Original article

Rishi Sunak Expresses Love for Indian Sweets at NDTV World Summit

Former UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak expressed his love for Indian sweets during the NDTV World Summit 2025, sharing personal anecdotes about his Diwali celebrations and family values.

At the NDTV World Summit 2025 held in New Delhi, former UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak shared his deep affection for Indian sweets, particularly during the festive occasion of Diwali. His remarks highlighted the cultural significance of these treats in his life and celebrations.

Sunak revealed that his Diwali shopping tradition begins at Khan Market, a popular destination known for its array of traditional sweets. He fondly recalled, “For me, Diwali shopping is mithai first,” underscoring the central role that sweets play in his festive experiences.

During his visit to the Bengali Sweet Market, Sunak indulged in fresh kulfi, a popular frozen dessert, and also selected jalebi and barfi to take home to his family. He expressed his enthusiasm for these traditional treats, noting that he had packed them carefully for his return journey, eager to share them with loved ones.

Beyond his culinary experiences, Sunak also reflected on the influence of his in-laws on his personal values and character. He spoke about the lessons he has learned from his father-in-law, Narayana Murthy, emphasizing the importance of respect, and from his mother-in-law, Sudha Murthy, highlighting the value of compassion. These qualities, he noted, are also reflected in his wife, Akshata Murthy.

Sunak’s heartfelt comments during the summit not only showcased his fondness for Indian sweets but also provided insight into the cultural values that shape his identity and family life.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Tech Leaders Navigate H-1B Visa Changes Under Trump Administration

Several prominent Indian-origin tech leaders have navigated the H-1B visa landscape, influencing the U.S. tech industry amid proposed reforms by the Trump administration.

Several prominent Indian-origin tech leaders, including Satya Nadella, Sundar Pichai, Aravind Srinivas, Jayshree Ullal, and Arvind Krishna, began their careers in the United States on H-1B visas. These individuals have played pivotal roles in shaping the tech industry, with companies like Microsoft, Google, Perplexity AI, Arista Networks, and IBM benefiting from their leadership.

However, recent policy changes proposed by the Trump administration, such as a $100,000 fee for H-1B visa petitions and stricter eligibility criteria, have raised concerns among the tech community. These reforms could significantly impact the hiring practices of tech companies that rely on skilled foreign talent.

In response, several tech leaders have expressed their opposition to the proposed changes. Sundar Pichai has emphasized the importance of immigration in driving innovation and economic success in the U.S. Similarly, Arvind Krishna has advocated for policies that attract global talent to maintain the country’s competitive edge.

The ongoing debate highlights the critical role of immigration in the growth and sustainability of the tech industry, underscoring the need for balanced policies that support both national interests and the contributions of skilled immigrants. The voices of these leaders reflect a broader concern within the industry about maintaining an environment conducive to innovation and progress.

As the discussion continues, the implications of these proposed reforms remain to be seen. The tech industry, which has thrived on the contributions of diverse talent, faces a pivotal moment in its evolution. The outcome of this debate could shape the future landscape of technology in the United States.

Source: Original article

Supreme Court Upholds Work Rights for H-1B Spouses of Indian-Americans

The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld work rights for certain spouses of H-1B visa holders by declining to review a challenge to a federal rule, affirming a previous appellate ruling.

In a significant legal development, the U.S. Supreme Court has chosen not to review a challenge to a federal rule that allows certain spouses of H-1B visa holders to work in the United States. This decision effectively upholds a 2024 appellate ruling that confirmed the legality of the program.

The case, known as Save Jobs USA v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), was initiated by a group representing American technology workers. They argued that the DHS had overstepped its authority by extending work authorization to holders of H-4 visas, which are granted to the dependents of H-1B skilled workers. By refusing to hear the case, the Supreme Court has left the D.C. Circuit’s decision intact, allowing the rule to remain in effect.

Introduced during the Obama administration in 2015, the rule permits certain H-4 visa holders—typically spouses of H-1B workers who are pursuing permanent residency—to obtain work authorization. Proponents of the policy argue that it promotes family unity and economic stability, while critics contend that it may displace American workers.

This ruling marks the conclusion of nearly a decade of legal challenges surrounding the issue and provides clarity for thousands of families navigating the complexities of the U.S. immigration system. It also highlights the ongoing debate over employment-based immigration policies and their implications for the domestic workforce.

As the landscape of immigration continues to evolve, this decision reinforces the rights of H-4 visa holders and their families, ensuring that they can contribute to the U.S. economy while maintaining their family ties.

Source: Original article

Tech Giants, Including Amazon and Google, Attend White House Dinner

President Donald Trump hosted a White House dinner for nearly 130 influential supporters and corporate leaders, celebrating a significant renovation project and unveiling new initiatives.

On Wednesday evening, President Donald Trump welcomed nearly 130 top donors, corporate allies, and influential supporters to a White House dinner. The event celebrated their commitments to a new, expansive ballroom, which is projected to cost around $250 million.

This ballroom renovation represents the largest undertaking of Trump’s second term, reflecting his background as a real estate developer. A White House official confirmed that representatives from major companies, including Amazon, Apple, Booz Allen Hamilton, Coinbase, Comcast, Google, Lockheed Martin, Meta, and T-Mobile, were in attendance. The Adelson Family Foundation, founded by prominent GOP donors Miriam Adelson and her late husband Sheldon, was also present at the gathering.

Among the notable guests were oil magnate Harold Hamm, Blackstone CEO Steve Schwarzman, Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler and her husband Jeff Sprecher, as well as cryptocurrency entrepreneurs Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, as reported by The Wall Street Journal.

During the dinner, Trump described the ballroom as a space that would feature bulletproof glass on all four sides, grand enough to host a presidential inauguration. He emphasized that the design elements, including window shapes, molding, and color, would align with the historic aesthetic of the White House. “To me, there’s nothing like the White House,” Trump remarked, adding, “It’s just a special place so we have to take care of it.”

The new ballroom is set to occupy the area currently housing the East Wing and will cover an impressive 90,000 square feet. Initially, the White House indicated that the venue would accommodate 650 guests, but Trump announced that it could actually host up to 999 people.

Despite the ambitious plans, the ballroom has not yet received clearance from the National Capital Planning Commission or the Commission of Fine Arts, which typically review federal construction projects. However, White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf, appointed by Trump to lead the planning commission, stated that such approval is not necessary. During the dinner, Trump asserted that as president, he faces no zoning restrictions and can proceed with the project as he deems fit.

In addition to the ballroom announcement, Trump introduced a separate initiative to construct an arch at one end of the Arlington Memorial Bridge, which connects Virginia and Washington, D.C. He showcased three scale models of the proposed arch, which will feature Lady Liberty atop it, noting that the largest model was his preferred design. “It’s going to be really beautiful,” Trump stated.

The presence of major corporations and high-profile tech leaders at the dinner underscores the growing alignment between Trump’s vision and the business community. Their investments and commitments reflect not only financial support but also a shared interest in shaping projects that resonate with the president’s ambitions. This gathering signals a deepening partnership between private enterprise and the initiatives of the Trump administration.

Source: Original article

Canada Warns Stellantis Against Shifting Production to the U.S.

Canada has threatened legal action against Stellantis NV over plans to shift production of a model to a U.S. plant, citing unmet commitments tied to financial support.

Canada is taking a firm stance against automaker Stellantis NV, threatening legal action over what it deems an unacceptable plan to relocate production of one of its models to a facility in the United States. This move has raised concerns about the commitments made by Stellantis in exchange for substantial financial support from the Canadian government.

Stellantis, formed in 2021 through the merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and PSA Group, is recognized as the world’s fourth-largest automaker by volume. The company boasts a diverse portfolio of well-known brands, including Jeep, Ram, Dodge, Peugeot, and Citroën. Stellantis operates extensively across North America, Europe, and other significant markets, offering a wide range of vehicles from passenger cars to trucks and commercial vehicles.

On Wednesday, Canadian Minister of Industry Melanie Joly addressed Stellantis CEO Antonio Filosa in a letter, emphasizing the company’s prior agreement to maintain its Canadian operations. Joly stated, “Anything short of fulfilling that commitment will be considered a default under our agreement.” She further warned that if Stellantis fails to uphold its commitments, Canada would “exercise all options, including legal.”

As of 2025, Stellantis is heavily investing in electrification and innovation, committing billions to develop electric vehicles and battery technologies. The company aims to lead in sustainable mobility by launching new electric platforms and expanding its lineup of hybrid and fully electric models. Stellantis is also adapting to global market challenges, such as supply chain disruptions and shifting consumer preferences.

Recently, Stellantis announced a $13 billion investment in the U.S., which the company claims will introduce five new models to the market. As part of this initiative, production of the Jeep Compass is set to move from a facility in Brampton, Ontario, to a plant in Illinois.

This controversy underscores the challenges Canada faces in securing long-term commitments from global automotive firms in a competitive and evolving industry. As nations vie for electric vehicle investments, Canada is asserting that public funding should translate into stable, local jobs. The resolution of this dispute could influence future investment policies and serve as a critical test case for balancing industrial support with accountability from private-sector partners.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford expressed his disappointment regarding Stellantis’s decision, stating in a social media post that he has communicated directly with the company about the matter.

For Stellantis, this situation presents both opportunities and risks. The company is strategically positioning itself to expand its U.S. operations and cater to the increasing demand for electric and hybrid vehicles. However, it also risks straining its long-standing relationships with Canadian authorities and labor forces, which could complicate future investments and operations in Canada.

Stellantis spokesperson LouAnn Gosselin reassured that the company remains committed to investing in Canada, highlighting plans to add a third shift at a plant in Windsor, Ontario. “Canada is very important to us. We have plans for Brampton and will share them upon further discussions with the Canadian government,” she stated in an email.

This situation also reflects the growing geopolitical and economic pressures on automakers to localize production amid rising protectionism and trade tensions. As countries like the U.S. and Canada compete for electric vehicle manufacturing and related supply chains, companies such as Stellantis must navigate not only market dynamics but also evolving government expectations tied to subsidies and job creation.

For Stellantis, effectively balancing cost-efficiency with political goodwill will be critical in maintaining access to incentives and avoiding reputational damage. For Canada, this dispute highlights the urgent need to establish more binding industrial agreements that ensure long-term economic returns on public investments.

Source: Original article

Global Economies Strained as U.S. Data Flow Halts During Shutdown

The U.S. government shutdown is disrupting vital economic data flows, creating challenges for global economies that rely on this information for trade and monetary policy decisions.

The ongoing U.S. government shutdown is casting a shadow over the global economy, as the flow of critical economic data from the United States has come to a halt. As the world’s largest economy, the U.S. plays a pivotal role in providing data that helps countries like Japan assess trade performance and currency trends. The absence of this information is causing significant challenges for nations around the globe.

Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda expressed concern during a news briefing on October 3, stating, “It’s a serious problem. We hope this gets fixed soon.” His comments highlight the difficulties the Bank of Japan faces in determining the timing of interest rate hikes amid the uncertainty created by the shutdown.

One unnamed Japanese policymaker voiced frustration, remarking, “It’s a joke. (Federal Reserve Chair Jerome) Powell keeps on saying the Fed’s policy is data-dependent, but there’s no data to depend upon.” This sentiment underscores the frustration felt by many economic leaders as they navigate the complexities of policymaking without access to essential data.

This week, finance and economic leaders from around the world are convening in Washington for meetings of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In a context marked by ongoing geopolitical tensions, including a land war in Europe and violence in the Middle East, discussions are likely to be dominated by President Donald Trump’s plans for the global economy, his performance in office, and the implications of the sudden cessation of data from the U.S., which represents a $30 trillion economy accounting for roughly one-fourth of global output.

The IMF’s World Economic Outlook, published on Tuesday, warned that “intensification of political pressure on policy institutions could erode hard-won public confidence in their ability to fulfill their mandates.” It further noted that pressures on institutions responsible for data collection and dissemination could undermine public and market trust in official statistics. This erosion of trust complicates the tasks of central banks and policymakers, increasing the likelihood of policy errors if political interference compromises data quality, reliability, and timeliness.

The impact of the U.S. government shutdown on economic data flow extends far beyond American borders, highlighting the interconnectedness of today’s global economy. Countries around the world depend on timely and reliable economic data from the United States to inform their monetary policies, trade decisions, and financial market strategies. The current disruption creates a climate of uncertainty, complicating decision-making for central banks and governments alike.

This situation not only hampers effective policymaking but also poses a risk to public and market trust in official statistics, which are foundational to economic stability. When the quality and availability of data are compromised, institutions like the Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan find it increasingly challenging to respond accurately to economic conditions, raising the potential for policy missteps.

As the world watches the developments in Washington, the hope remains that the U.S. government will resolve the shutdown soon, restoring the flow of vital economic data and alleviating the pressures faced by global economies.

Source: Original article

Dr. C. Bob Basu Elected President of Major Plastic Surgery Society

Dr. C. Bob Basu has been appointed President of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, aiming to enhance member resources and uphold high standards in patient care.

Dr. C. Bob Basu has officially assumed the role of President of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), the largest global association of board-certified plastic surgeons. His term commenced on October 12 during the Society’s annual scientific meeting held in New Orleans.

Based in Houston, Dr. Basu leads Basu Aesthetics + Plastic Surgery and brings a wealth of surgical experience to his new leadership position, having performed over 18,000 procedures throughout his career. As president of ASPS, he intends to leverage emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, to enhance the services and resources available to the Society’s more than 11,000 members worldwide.

In his inaugural address, Dr. Basu emphasized his commitment to maintaining the highest standards in ethics, patient safety, education, and surgical training. He highlighted the growing interest in cosmetic procedures and urged patients to seek care exclusively from board-certified plastic surgeons to ensure their safety and well-being.

Dr. Basu’s tenure in ASPS leadership spans nearly two decades. He previously served as Vice President of Finance and Treasurer, playing a crucial role in guiding the organization through challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic while achieving record financial performance. His contributions extend to health policy, surgical education, and governance within ASPS.

Dr. Basu holds a bachelor’s degree from Princeton University, as well as both an MD and MPH from Tufts University, and an MBA from Brandeis University. He completed his plastic surgery training at Baylor College of Medicine’s Department of Surgery before establishing his practice and reputation in Houston.

As he embarks on this new chapter, Dr. Basu’s leadership is expected to influence the future of plastic surgery, focusing on innovation and the highest standards of patient care.

Source: Original article

Supreme Court Provides Relief for H-4 EAD Holders Amid Uncertainty

The Supreme Court’s decision to decline a challenge to the H-4 EAD program offers temporary relief to immigrant spouses, yet experts caution that its future remains uncertain amid shifting political landscapes.

The Supreme Court’s recent decision not to hear a challenge against the H-4 work authorization has provided a moment of stability for thousands of immigrant spouses. However, experts warn that the program’s future is still closely tied to the unpredictable nature of political will.

In recent months, the immigration landscape in the United States has been tumultuous, with work visa holders facing significant uncertainty due to abrupt policy changes from the Trump administration. Amid this chaos, a cautious sense of optimism has emerged for H-4 EAD (Employment Authorization Document) holders, who are primarily spouses of H-1B visa holders.

On Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court declined to review a petition filed by Save Jobs USA, which sought to challenge a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. This ruling affirmed that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had the authority to implement the H-4 EAD rule. The news was met with celebrations among H-4 EAD holders, who viewed the decision as a protective measure for their work authorization.

Johnson Myalil, an immigration attorney based in the Washington, D.C., area, expressed cautious optimism about the ruling. “In some ways, it is good news, as it removes the uncertainty of the court invalidating the H-4 employment authorization, which is used by a substantial number of highly educated spouses of H-1B professionals—estimated to be around at least 300,000,” he stated.

Despite the positive implications of the Supreme Court’s decision, experts caution that challenges remain. Nandini Nair, an immigration attorney at A.Y. Strauss, LLC, emphasized the need for caution. “Absolutely not,” she said when asked if the decision alleviates uncertainty for H-4 EAD holders. “While the Supreme Court declined review this time, a different case with a stronger factual or procedural posture could make its way up again. The program is safe for now, but its survival depends on regulatory stability and political will.”

Nair further noted that for the H-4 EAD program to achieve true permanence, it would need to be codified by Congress rather than relying solely on regulation. “But for today, we can breathe a bit easier,” she added.

The history of the H-4 EAD program has been fraught with challenges. Introduced in 2015 during President Barack Obama’s administration, the program faced immediate opposition from Save Jobs USA, which argued that the DHS had overstepped its authority. This led to years of litigation, leaving many H-4 EAD holders in limbo as companies hesitated to hire them amid ongoing uncertainty.

Myalil remains cautious about the program’s future, stating, “We cannot rule out the possibility that immigration restriction advocates in the Trump administration may push for the cancellation of H-4 EAD through the federal rulemaking process.” However, he also pointed out a silver lining: “That process can take several years.”

Critics of the H-4 work authorization often argue that it takes job opportunities away from American workers. Yet, mounting evidence and legal testimony suggest the opposite—that H-4 EAD holders have made significant economic contributions. Nair highlighted that H-4 EAD holders are predominantly women who contribute billions in household income and tax revenue. Many work in high-demand STEM fields, launch startups, open businesses, and even employ U.S. workers.

“H-4 EADs aren’t just about helping immigrant families; they’re about unlocking untapped talent, boosting the U.S. economy, promoting equity, and stabilizing the workforce. This program has actually been a net gain for the United States,” Nair asserted.

Her argument is supported by data. A 2019 analysis by the American Action Forum, utilizing U.S. Census data, estimated that H-4 workers contribute approximately $12.9 billion annually to the U.S. GDP. This figure could rise to between $40 and $41 billion if all eligible spouses were authorized to work. A 2024 report by FWD.us found that removing current H-4 EAD holders from the workforce would shrink annual GDP by $7.5 billion and cut tax revenues by $2 billion across federal, state, and local levels.

Despite these positive contributions, the H-4 EAD program has often been unfairly criticized, similar to the H-1B visa program. This criticism often stems from widespread misconceptions about immigration’s role in the American economy. Nair noted, “They often get a bad rap because of the persistent narrative that H-1B visa holders ‘take American jobs.’ That same mindset spills over to the H-4 EAD program.”

She concluded, “The controversy isn’t really about H-4 spouses at all—it’s about the larger debate over high-skilled immigration.”

Source: Original article

Governor Newsom Vetoes SB509, Indian-American Groups Express Support

Governor Gavin Newsom’s veto of Senate Bill 509 has been welcomed by various Indian American groups, who expressed concerns about potential divisions within California’s diverse communities.

Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed Senate Bill 509 (SB 509) on Sunday, October 12, effectively sparing diverse diasporic communities in California from what critics described as “potential divisions over redundant transnational repression training mandates.”

Authored by Senator Anna Caballero (D-Merced), SB 509 aimed to establish a specialized law enforcement training program designed to help officers recognize and respond to transnational repression. This term refers to the harassment, threats, and intimidation perpetrated by foreign governments against diaspora communities within the United States. The bill was co-authored by Senators Jasmeet Bains (D-35, Bakersfield) and Esmeralda Soria (D-27, Merced).

In a statement accompanying the introduction of SB 509, Caballero noted that authoritarian regimes worldwide are extending their influence into the U.S., targeting immigrant, refugee, and asylum-seeker communities. These governments employ methods such as digital surveillance, social media monitoring, and covert intimidation tactics to silence dissent and suppress free expression, even within U.S. borders.

“Just as law enforcement is trained to identify domestic violence and human trafficking, they must also be prepared to protect communities targeted by foreign governments,” Caballero stated. “SB 509 is about justice, dignity, and ensuring that no one in California lives in fear because of who they are or where they come from. All Californians deserve to feel safe in their homes, workplaces, and neighborhoods.”

California’s diverse communities, particularly ethnic and religious minorities who have fled oppressive regimes, have frequently been targets of abuse. However, local police often lack the training necessary to identify these issues or assist victims effectively. SB 509 received support from both police leaders and immigrant rights organizations, including the California Police Chiefs Association and Immigrant Defense Advocates. The bill proposed that the Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), in consultation with the Commission on Peace Officer Standards, develop training to identify and respond to transnational repression.

Despite its support, SB 509 faced criticism from certain Hindu and Indian American groups, who expressed concerns about legislative overreach and the potential for stigmatization of communities of Indian origin. Ajay Jain Bhutoria, a vocal opponent of the bill, argued that its focus on specific training for local law enforcement duplicated existing federal guidelines from the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. He warned that this could lead to unnecessary profiling and fracture alliances within California’s vibrant South Asian diaspora.

Grassroots organizations such as the Hindu American Foundation (HAF) and the Coalition of Hindus of North America (CoHNA) mobilized against the bill, organizing protests, circulating petitions, and hosting community forums to halt its progress in Sacramento. Despite their efforts, the bill continued to gain traction, highlighting the challenges of opposing bipartisan support without direct access to executive power.

Although the bill passed the state legislature, it was ultimately vetoed by Governor Newsom. In his statement, the Governor explained that the issue would be more effectively addressed through administrative processes in coordination with federal agencies. He emphasized that, in the absence of a consistent federal definition, the bill would limit the state’s flexibility and could lead to future inconsistencies in its implementation.

The veto was met with approval from critics of the bill. Bhutoria remarked, “His veto of SB 509 preserves our harmony, ensuring that we build bridges rather than barriers among diaspora communities.”

Source: Original article

Connecticut Congressman Jim Himes Backs GOPIO-CT on H-1B Visa Fees

Connecticut Congressman Jim Himes recently met with GOPIO-CT to discuss concerns over a proposed $100,000 fee increase for H-1B visas, emphasizing its potential negative impact on small businesses and the economy.

On October 9, 2025, the Connecticut chapter of the Global Organization of People of Indian Origin (GOPIO-CT) held a virtual meeting with Congressman Jim Himes (CT-4) to address the contentious $100,000 fee hike for H-1B visas, a policy introduced during the Trump Administration. The meeting included GOPIO-CT officials, representatives from GOPIO International, and business owners who would be affected by this significant change.

Dr. Thomas Abraham, Chairman of GOPIO and Trustee and Advisor to the chapter, underscored the H-1B program’s substantial contribution to the U.S. economy, noting it generates over $200 billion annually while costing only $8.5 billion. He cautioned that increasing barriers for highly skilled professionals may drive them to seek opportunities in countries such as Canada, Germany, and China, which could result in long-term economic detriment for the United States.

Mahesh Jhangiani, President of GOPIO-CT, highlighted the disproportionate impact of the fee hike on small and medium-sized enterprises, which typically lack the resources to absorb such a steep cost unlike larger corporations. He also expressed concerns regarding what he characterized as anti-India policies from the current administration.

Members of GOPIO-CT, including Prasad Chintalapudi from Panzer Solutions and Shailesh Naik of Cameron Engineers, emphasized the role of small businesses employing H-1B workers in fostering local employment and driving economic growth. They pointed out that many successful leaders in the tech industry, such as Elon Musk, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, and Aravind Krishna, have benefitted from the H-1B program.

Attorney Nandita Ruchandani, representing Cameron Engineers, remarked on the critical sectors where H-1B visa holders work, including healthcare, education, engineering, and technology. She stressed that these immigrants not only contribute taxes and purchase homes but also support local communities. However, the prohibitive fee could jeopardize their employment.

Dr. S.K. Lo, Chairperson of the Asian American Unity Coalition (AAUC), also participated in the discussion, reinforcing the necessity of a collective approach to tackle these pressing issues.

Congressman Jim Himes, who is currently serving his ninth term and holds senior positions on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Financial Services Committee, expressed his full support for GOPIO-CT’s position. He acknowledged the risk of losing valuable talent and reiterated the importance of continued U.S.-India collaboration in areas such as commerce, trade, and defense.

For over two decades, GOPIO-CT has actively engaged in community programs, youth mentoring, policy discussions, and cultural initiatives. The chapter aims to promote awareness of Indian heritage while fostering dialogue and partnerships with local communities.

Source: Original article

Hamas Executes Rivals in Gaza Following Trump’s ‘War Is Over’ Declaration

Gaza faces a critical juncture as Hamas executes rivals to reassert control following President Trump’s declaration that “the war is over,” raising questions about the region’s future stability.

Gaza is at a pivotal moment as the deployment of a disarmament and stabilization force will be crucial in determining whether the region can begin rebuilding or if chaos will return.

Following President Donald Trump’s declaration in Israel’s Knesset that “the war is over” and the celebration of the return of remaining hostages, reports emerged of Hamas executing its opponents in Gaza City’s main square. Videos circulating on social media appear to show these executions, which an Israeli military official described as “Hamas’s deliberate attempt to show the killings publicly and reestablish its rule by terrorizing civilians.”

In conversations with Fox News Digital, residents of Gaza reported that Hamas fighters have reappeared on the streets, reasserting their control. However, some citizens expressed hope that this could be an opportunity for change and a chance to rid themselves of the terror regime.

Mukhaimar Abu Saada, a political analyst from Gaza, emphasized that disarming Hamas will not be a straightforward process. He noted that clashes between Hamas and local militias have already erupted. “This won’t happen quickly,” he stated. “We’re talking about an ideological organization. Even last night, people were killed in clashes between Hamas and local militias. It’s not a rosy road.”

Abu Saada revealed that Hamas has issued an ultimatum to collaborators with Israel, demanding they surrender and seek amnesty by October 19, provided they were not involved in killings. “They’re still strong,” he admitted. “Part of the reason they didn’t fight harder in the last days is that they saved some men and weapons for the day after. I still see Hamas police in the streets of Gaza. Trump said they lost thousands, but they’re still there, able to control the streets once Israel redeploys.”

One anonymous resident of Gaza expressed skepticism about the official declarations of peace. “You cannot say the war is finished,” he said. “We have to wait a few weeks to see what happens. There are gangs in Gaza now; Hamas is trying to fight them. If they don’t unify, another war could start.” He characterized Hamas as weakened and divided, stating, “Hamas is not strong like before. Those who remain are mostly police — not the real Hamas people who believe in their extremist jihadist ideology.” He emphasized the need for clarity regarding the future and the group’s survival, which he believes hinges on whether Hamas accepts the proposed deal.

Another resident echoed this uncertainty, saying, “No one knows what is happening — who will rule, what will happen with Hamas, and if the war is truly over. We hope for a better future. I just want me and my family to live without targeting, without bloodshed.” He noted that ordinary Gazans are exhausted but yearning for calm. “People just want the blood to stop. They want to stop losing their relatives and friends. It’s in their hands now — if they will allow Hamas to continue or finally rise up. But nothing is clear.”

Abu Saada asserted that there is “no question” Hamas will have to disarm eventually, describing it as an inevitable part of the plan announced by President Trump and endorsed by Israeli leadership. “The real question is who will hold those weapons — the Palestinian Authority or the so-called ‘security stabilization force’ that’s supposed to deploy next. It’s definitely going to happen, but we have to wait for the second phase of the negotiations.”

He added that even Qatari mediators have confirmed that disarmament “has not yet been discussed but will be discussed in the coming days.” For now, Gazans are focused on survival after enduring “two years of misery, destruction, and bloodshed.” Ultimately, he believes Hamas will have to comply, stating, “No Arab country will give a single dollar if Hamas doesn’t disarm. Rebuilding Gaza depends on Hamas no longer being in control. The war is over, but the real test is only beginning.”

While voices inside Gaza reflect uncertainty, experts in Washington assert that Hamas’s political and military isolation has never been greater. Jacob Olidort, director of the Center for American Security at the America First Policy Institute, told Fox News Digital that Hamas is “in the most militarily and diplomatically isolated place it has ever been.”

“Even before and after the release of hostages, Hamas has been defiant in tone,” Olidort noted. “But all of that will be overshadowed by the vast expansion of peace agreements between Israel and its neighbors. All of Israel’s regional partners are eager to normalize and build on where they left off prior to October 7.”

Olidort indicated that the upcoming Sharm el-Sheikh summit will mark the beginning of phase two of Trump’s plan. “Whatever is happening now on the ground doesn’t reflect Gaza’s future,” he said. “None of the steps in the peace plan have been implemented yet. What comes next will be defined by that summit and by the regional consensus that Hamas cannot continue to control Gaza.”

For Israel, he added, “the focus will be restarting, in a more public way, its regional and global partnerships — defense, commercial, and diplomatic. That’s where Israel’s future lies.” While the guns have fallen silent, the next stage — Hamas’ disarmament and the arrival of a stabilization force — will determine whether Gaza can finally begin rebuilding or slip back into chaos. As Abu Saada succinctly put it, “The war is over, but the question is whether peace will really begin.”

Source: Original article

SEC Claims India Did Not Respond in Adani Group Legal Proceedings

The U.S. SEC has informed a federal court that Indian authorities have not responded to its legal notices regarding the Adani Group, amid ongoing investigations into allegations of securities fraud.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently reported to a federal court that Indian authorities have failed to respond to its attempts to serve legal notices and complaints to executives at the Adani Group. This development comes as the SEC investigates the conglomerate over serious allegations, including securities fraud and a $265 million bribery scheme.

The case surrounding the Adani Group has garnered considerable attention in the United States, particularly as state regulators seek cooperation from Indian officials. According to reports, the SEC has made multiple attempts to reach India’s Ministry of Law to serve legal documents to Adani Group founder Gautam Adani and his nephew, Sagar Adani. Despite the SEC’s latest communication with the ministry on September 14, there has been no confirmation of delivery.

The SEC stated in its court filing, “The SEC will continue communicating with the India Ministry of Law and Justice and pursuing service of the defendants via the Hague Service Convention.” This indicates the agency’s commitment to ensuring that legal proceedings can move forward despite the challenges posed by international jurisdiction.

In 2024, prosecutors in Brooklyn charged the Adani Group with allegedly bribing Indian officials to secure electricity purchases from its subsidiary, Adani Green Energy. The SEC claims that the executives who benefited from these payments misled U.S. investors regarding the company’s anti-corruption measures.

The Adani Group has characterized the SEC’s allegations as “baseless” and has pledged to explore “all possible legal recourse” to dismiss the claims. In January, Adani Green Energy engaged independent law firms to conduct a thorough review of the charges against them.

On November 20, 2024, U.S. prosecutors charged Gautam Adani, his nephew Sagar Adani, and others with bribery, securities fraud, wire fraud, and related conspiracies. The SEC alleged that the defendants paid bribes totaling $244 million (approximately ₹2,029 crore) to secure solar power contracts across various Indian states, facilitated through the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI).

The SEC’s original complaint indicated that the U.S. indictment arose from claims that the Adani Group failed to disclose its involvement in a complex and high-value bribery scheme to U.S. investors. Since February, the SEC has been in contact with India’s Ministry of Law and Justice to serve notices to the Adani Group within India.

Earlier in February, the SEC had formally requested assistance from India’s law ministry to help deliver the summons. A report from March revealed that the Ministry of Law had forwarded the summons for Gautam Adani and others to a court in Ahmedabad, which was responsible for delivering the documents to Adani’s local address. However, it appears that the papers have not been served in the six months since that action.

In a filing dated August 11, the SEC reiterated its ongoing efforts to serve the Adani Group in India, emphasizing the importance of resolving these legal matters as the investigation continues.

Source: Original article

ChatGPT Not Suitable for Workplace Use, Says AWS’s Julia White

Amazon has unveiled Quick Suite, an AI-driven workspace designed to enhance productivity and compete with major players like Microsoft and Google in the enterprise AI market.

Amazon has officially launched Quick Suite, a new artificial intelligence platform that integrates chatbots and AI agents to streamline tasks such as data analysis, report generation, and content summarization. This innovative tool positions itself as a competitor to Microsoft 365 Copilot, Google Gemini, and OpenAI’s ChatGPT within the rapidly evolving enterprise AI landscape.

Quick Suite is priced at $20 per month and boasts seamless integration with popular enterprise tools, including Salesforce, Slack, Microsoft cloud storage, and Adobe applications. Amazon describes Quick Suite as “a new agentic teammate that quickly answers your questions at work and turns those insights into actions for you.” The platform aims to consolidate AI-powered research, business intelligence, and automation capabilities into a single, user-friendly workspace.

With Quick Suite, users can analyze data through natural language queries, quickly locate critical information across both internal and external sources, and automate processes ranging from simple tasks to complex workflows that span multiple departments. The tool is designed to enhance productivity and efficiency in the workplace.

Julia White, the marketing chief of AWS, emphasized the platform’s capabilities, stating, “We are putting this out now because both internal and external customers are like, ‘This thing’s good, let’s go.’ ChatGPT is great, but, you know, you can’t use it at work.” Her comments highlight the growing demand for secure and reliable AI solutions in professional environments.

The launch of Quick Suite comes amid heightened competition in the enterprise AI sector. Earlier this month, Google introduced its Gemini Enterprise plan, which offers various pricing tiers starting at $30 per user per month for Standard and Plus options, and $21 per user per month for startups. Microsoft’s 365 Copilot also targets enterprise users at a similar price point of $30 per user per month. Meanwhile, OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude provide enterprise tiers, though their pricing details remain undisclosed.

Google’s Gemini Enterprise allows customers to utilize its AI capabilities to analyze corporate data and access AI agents from a centralized platform. This offering includes a feature called Workbench, enabling users to coordinate AI agents for task automation, as well as a “taskforce” of prebuilt Google agents designed for deep research on various topics. Users can connect Gemini Enterprise to existing data sources, including Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Salesforce, and SAP, while also tracking and auditing agents to ensure they operate effectively and with the correct data.

As companies increasingly turn to AI solutions to enhance their operations, Amazon’s Quick Suite aims to capture businesses seeking secure and scalable options. With its competitive pricing and robust features, Quick Suite is poised to make a significant impact in the enterprise AI market.

Source: Original article

Trump Advocates Mortgage Fraud Investigations Targeting Political Opponents

President Donald Trump is amplifying allegations of mortgage fraud against political opponents, including New York Attorney General Letitia James, amid ongoing legal challenges.

President Donald Trump is intensifying his campaign against political opponents by raising allegations of mortgage fraud. This strategy comes as he faces various legal challenges, including ongoing investigations into his own business practices.

Recently, New York Attorney General Letitia James was indicted on charges of bank fraud and making false statements regarding a mortgage loan. Trump’s campaign has also directed its focus toward Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, who is accused of misrepresenting information on a mortgage application. Additionally, Senator Adam Schiff is reportedly under federal investigation for similar allegations.

Mortgage fraud typically involves the deliberate provision of false or omitted information on mortgage applications. This can include misrepresenting income, assets, or property occupancy. Trump’s probes have particularly centered on occupancy fraud, which occurs when a property is falsely claimed as a primary residence while it is actually rented out or unused.

Experts highlight that mortgage fraud is relatively rare, and proving malicious intent can be quite challenging. Clifford Rossi, a finance professor at the University of Maryland, noted that errors on mortgage forms can happen innocently. For instance, a borrower might mistakenly mark a property as their primary residence even if co-borrowers are living there.

Data indicates that only 1 in 116 mortgage applications in the second quarter of 2025 were flagged as potentially fraudulent, with occupancy fraud being even less common. This raises questions about the validity of the allegations being made against James, Cook, and Schiff.

James, who previously secured a significant civil victory against Trump for mortgage and tax fraud, is accused of claiming a property in Norfolk, Virginia, as a secondary residence while it was being rented out. She has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, labeling the charges as “baseless.” Civil rights groups have condemned the indictment, calling it an abuse of power. Schiff has echoed these sentiments, describing the investigation as a “vindictive prosecution.”

In response to the allegations, Cook has denied any wrongdoing concerning her vacation home and has initiated legal action to counter Trump’s attempts to remove her from her position. She asserts that the efforts against her are politically motivated.

Trump has publicly called for the swift prosecution of James, Schiff, and former FBI Director James Comey, asserting that “justice must be served.” He claims that legal experts support his stance on the matter.

However, legal specialists caution that proving intentional fraud is extremely difficult. Errors or misunderstandings on mortgage documents are common, making it challenging to establish malicious intent. Rossi, the former Citi risk officer, emphasized that even when fraud is suspected, prosecuting such cases can be quite complex.

Moreover, experts have raised ethical concerns regarding Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Pulte publicly requested investigations into Cook’s mortgage on social media rather than pursuing formal internal channels, which has sparked debate about the appropriateness of his actions.

As the legal battles unfold, the implications of these allegations could have significant consequences for the individuals involved and the broader political landscape.

Source: Original article

French Prime Minister Resigns After Short Tenure of Less Than a Month

French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has resigned after less than a month in office, marking the shortest tenure in the history of the Fifth Republic.

French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has resigned after serving less than a month in office, making his tenure the briefest in the history of the Fifth Republic. Appointed on September 9, 2025, Lecornu stepped down on October 6, 2025, just hours after unveiling his cabinet.

The resignation comes amid intense criticism from across the political spectrum. Both allies and opponents raised concerns about his cabinet appointments, which ultimately led to a significant loss of support within his own conservative camp. This development has intensified the political instability that has characterized President Emmanuel Macron’s administration since the 2024 legislative elections, which resulted in a deeply divided parliament.

In light of the crisis, President Macron had tasked Lecornu with holding urgent talks with various political parties to address the ongoing deadlock. However, the pressure from both far-right and far-left factions has severely limited Macron’s options. He now faces the difficult decision of whether to reappoint Lecornu, select a new prime minister, or call for snap elections.

The ongoing political turmoil is not without economic consequences. France’s GDP growth is now forecasted to slow to 0.7% in 2025, a decrease from the initial projection of 1%. This downturn is attributed to waning consumer and business confidence, which has led to reduced household consumption and investment.

As the situation continues to evolve, President Macron is confronted with critical decisions that will be essential for restoring stability and addressing the pressing economic and political challenges facing the nation.

Source: Original article

Netanyahu Gains Unexpected Support as Concerns Over Government Stability Rise

Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid extends support to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu amid ongoing hostage negotiations and concerns over the stability of Netanyahu’s government.

Two years after the tragic events of October 7, 2023, when Hamas terrorists attacked Israel, killing 1,200 individuals and taking 251 hostages into Gaza, the situation remains precarious. There is still no resolution regarding the hostages, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government faces the threat of collapse. In this challenging context, Netanyahu has found an unexpected ally in Yair Lapid, the leader of the opposition and former Prime Minister, who has offered a “security net” to help stabilize the government as negotiations with Hamas continue.

“Nothing is more important than making this deal, bringing our hostages back home,” Lapid stated in an interview with Fox News Digital.

Lapid’s support comes at a critical time, as right-wing leaders within Netanyahu’s coalition, including National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, have expressed dissatisfaction with Netanyahu’s acceptance of a peace plan proposed by former President Donald Trump. They have threatened to withdraw from the coalition multiple times over the past year.

Netanyahu’s coalition lost its majority in the Knesset in July when two ultra-Orthodox parties exited their ministerial roles following the expiration of an exemption that allowed religious students to avoid military conscription. This departure left Netanyahu’s coalition with control over just 50 of the 120 seats in the Knesset.

<p”Now he’s totally dependent on the extreme alt-right within his government that says no to any deal [with Hamas],” Lapid explained.

When asked about the likelihood of special elections being called once the Knesset reconvenes after its autumn break on October 19, Lapid responded, “very likely.” However, he noted that a special election would not occur before February or March 2026, as there is a designated timeframe for campaigning in Israel. Should the Knesset trigger an early election cycle by November, it would be just seven months earlier than the previously scheduled elections in October 2026.

Lapid believes that the Israeli public would support a more centrist government that includes both right and left factions. He argues that such a coalition would prioritize Israeli security while also working towards an end to the war in Gaza and restoring Jerusalem’s international standing.

“If there’s one thing I’m sorry about, [it] is the fact that nobody in the government has the political courage to stand up and say…this is a just war, we are doing what needs to be done in order to protect ourselves, but we are sorry for every child that loses his life,” Lapid remarked. “Children should not die in grownups’ wars.”

He expressed concern that the current government’s failure to articulate a clear strategy against Hamas has contributed to media bias and false reporting, ultimately costing Israel valuable international support, even from groups that have traditionally backed the nation.

Reflecting on a meeting he had with Netanyahu on October 7, 2023, Lapid described the prime minister as appearing “gray and tired and old all of a sudden.” He recalled telling Netanyahu, “Prime Minister, this is the worst day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust,” and urged the formation of a unity government. Lapid emphasized the need to remove extremists from the government to create a coalition capable of addressing the unprecedented challenges facing Israel.

Despite Lapid’s suggestions, he noted that Netanyahu was “reluctant” to pursue this path. “Until this day, I’m sorry about this. I thought it was the right thing to do, and I still think it was the right thing to do,” he added.

Netanyahu has been a prominent figure in Israeli politics for 15 years, first serving as Prime Minister from March 2009 to June 2021, and then regaining the position in December 2022. Lapid described Netanyahu’s lengthy tenure as “admirable” and a testament to his “resilience,” while also acknowledging the potential benefits of term limits, similar to those in the United States.

Lapid believes that Israelis are ready for a “unity government” in response to Netanyahu’s hard-right coalition. He anticipates that the upcoming elections will be “interesting,” crossing political lines and based on hope.

“It’s been the hardest two years of everybody’s lifetime. And for the first time in a long, long time, the fragility of Israeli society was tangible to us. And we need to rebuild,” Lapid concluded.

Netanyahu’s office did not respond to inquiries from Fox News Digital by the time this report was published.

Source: Original article

Kaelyn Faces Debt to Prevent Partner’s Deportation to El Salvador

Kaelyn’s unexpected romance with Yapa, an asylum seeker from Venezuela, has turned into a desperate fight against his deportation, leading her into significant debt for legal support.

Last summer, Kaelyn found herself at a Latin club in Wilmington, North Carolina, when a charming stranger asked her to dance. Initially reluctant, she was drawn in by his genuine demeanor. “If anyone else had asked, I would’ve said no, but Yapa is so genuine,” she recalls, using a pseudonym to protect his identity. What began as a dance blossomed into a deep friendship and romance, but it would soon lead to a desperate battle for Yapa’s freedom.

Yapa, who fled violence in Venezuela in 2022, was an asylum seeker with a legal work permit. He attended regular court hearings and worked as a delivery driver, aspiring to obtain his commercial trucking license. As their relationship grew, Kaelyn became an integral part of his life.

They celebrated Thanksgiving together, with Yapa bonding with Kaelyn’s family, even playing pool with her father. Her affection for him was evident as his sisters affectionately called her “reina,” a term of endearment meaning queen. They spent their time watching movies and overcoming language barriers with translation apps and Kaelyn’s college Spanish. Each morning, Yapa would text her to ask about her day, solidifying their connection.

Before meeting Yapa, Kaelyn rarely considered immigration policy. Originally from Connecticut, she had relocated to Wilmington for work in film location scouting. However, the political climate shifted dramatically after President Trump’s election, which sparked her concerns about the treatment of asylum seekers.

“People would tell me, ‘Oh, you’re overreacting,’” she says. “This isn’t 1930s Germany. And I’d say, ‘Yeah, but it’s starting to feel that way.’ Looking back now, while people were telling me I was being dramatic, I was actually underreacting.”

On February 22, 2025, Kaelyn’s worst fears materialized when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrived unexpectedly in the early morning hours while Yapa was preparing for work. Without explanation, they handcuffed him, confiscating his ID and work permit—documents that have not been returned. They provided no information about his destination, only that he was being deported.

Kaelyn was devastated when Yapa’s sister called to inform her of his detention. Just the night before, Yapa had stayed with her, and she had hoped to keep him close as a U.S. citizen, believing she could better advocate for his rights. “I couldn’t explain it, but I was so emotional,” she recalls of their final night together. “And he told me, ‘There’s no reason for them to take me.’” Now, they faced an urgent need to act to save him.

Yapa was transported to Georgia’s Stewart Detention Center, where he faced allegations of gang affiliation with the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA) during a hearing two months later. “Shocking is not even the word,” Kaelyn says, recalling her reaction. “I was shaking.”

In a recent court filing, ICE admitted it has no evidence linking Yapa to any gang. However, a ruling from the Trump administration complicates the situation for immigrants like Yapa, who entered the country recently and are now struggling to secure their release from detention. Yapa could remain incarcerated for up to a year while his asylum case is pending, facing the grim possibility of deportation to a dangerous environment.

Kaelyn’s fear of the allegations against Yapa was palpable, knowing that if he were deported, he could end up in CECOT, a notorious prison in El Salvador known for its brutality. “I thought, I’m going to have to live the rest of my life knowing he’s in there, and there’s nothing that we can do to get him out of there,” she reflects. The thought of Yapa, along with many other innocent individuals, being imprisoned in what some describe as a modern-day concentration camp is an “atrocity,” she asserts.

The emotional and financial toll on Kaelyn has been immense. She has hired multiple attorneys to advocate for Yapa and has incurred significant debt due to legal fees. Meanwhile, Yapa is held nearly nine hours away from Wilmington, with limited access to phone communication. In April, attorneys from the American Immigration Council and the ACLU took on part of Yapa’s case pro bono. By May, they secured a ruling that prevents the Trump administration from deporting Yapa to CECOT or elsewhere based on the Alien Enemies Act without allowing him a fair chance to contest the TdA allegations. While this decision brought some relief, Kaelyn’s life has been drastically altered.

Conversations with her sister now revolve primarily around updates on Yapa’s case and the latest developments in immigration policy. “We can’t be happy when there’s literally a member of our family who’s been taken from us,” she says. “I’ll never let this go. The administration thinks they’re sowing fear—but they’re creating activists. You can’t destroy someone’s life and expect us to stay quiet.”

Source: Original article

USA Cricket Faces Challenges Following USAC Bankruptcy Filing

The ongoing crisis in USA Cricket has led to the organization filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy amid governance issues and an ICC suspension, raising concerns about the future of cricket in the U.S.

USA Cricket (USAC) is facing a significant crisis as it has initiated bankruptcy proceedings, citing the need for a structural reorganization. This move comes in the wake of the International Cricket Council (ICC) suspending USAC’s membership due to ongoing governance failures.

Founded in 2017, USA Cricket serves as the official governing body for cricket in the United States. It is responsible for promoting, developing, and regulating the sport across the country. USAC is recognized by the ICC as the representative body for cricket in the U.S. and oversees the national teams, domestic leagues, and grassroots programs.

The organization aims to grow cricket in the United States by building a robust infrastructure, enhancing governance, and creating pathways for players to compete at international levels. USAC manages both the men’s and women’s national teams, which participate in ICC events and regional competitions.

In recent years, USAC has collaborated with American Cricket Enterprises (ACE) to launch Major League Cricket (MLC), a professional T20 league designed to elevate cricket’s profile and provide opportunities for both domestic and international players.

However, USAC has encountered significant challenges, including governance issues and financial disputes with ACE. In 2025, the ICC suspended USAC’s membership, citing repeated failures in governance. Following this suspension, USAC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as part of a restructuring effort aimed at stabilizing its operations and resolving ongoing conflicts.

Despite these setbacks, USAC remains committed to fostering the growth of cricket within the diverse American sporting landscape. The organization hopes to establish the U.S. as a competitive cricketing nation in the years to come.

In a statement, USAC described the bankruptcy filing as an “aggressive” and “legal” move necessary to “ensure the future of American cricket.” The organization noted that one contributing factor to its financial reorganization was the strain and operational interference stemming from the agreement with ACE.

USAC indicated that the original 50-year agreement with ACE heavily favored the latter and was not negotiated transparently. It was reportedly arranged by a board member who did not disclose conflicts of interest involving both himself and his employer.

Despite the challenges, there remains a sense of optimism within the cricket community regarding the sport’s future in the United States. The country’s diverse population and increasing interest in cricket provide a promising foundation for long-term growth.

The announcement of the bankruptcy filing was made public in a media release, where USAC stated that it had “voluntarily” filed for financial reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This decision is particularly concerning as it follows the ICC’s suspension of USAC on September 23 for serious breaches of membership criteria.

The ongoing crisis underscores significant challenges in governance, financial management, and organizational stability within USA Cricket. The ICC’s suspension signals a loss of confidence from the global cricket authority, while the termination of the long-term agreement with ACE and the ensuing legal battles reveal deep operational and financial conflicts within U.S. cricket administration.

The Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing reflects an urgent need for financial restructuring to ensure the survival and future growth of cricket in America. This turbulent period suggests that without effective reforms and resolution of disputes, USA Cricket’s ability to develop the sport nationally and compete internationally could be jeopardized.

The involvement of the ICC’s Normalization Committee and ongoing legal scrutiny indicate a potential path toward rebuilding. However, much will depend on transparent governance and clear financial accountability moving forward.

Source: Original article

New Report Highlights Impact of Expanded Travel Ban on Indian-Americans

A new report highlights the significant economic and humanitarian impacts of the Trump administration’s expanded travel ban, which affects immigration from 19 countries.

WASHINGTON, DC, August 6 — A report released today by the American Immigration Council outlines the extensive economic and humanitarian consequences of the Trump administration’s travel ban, which was expanded in June 2025 to restrict immigration from 19 countries. In 2022, nearly 300,000 individuals from these nations entered the United States, contributing approximately $715.6 million in taxes and filling essential roles in various sectors.

“Those affected by this travel ban are students, workers, and family members who pay taxes, support local economies, and fill jobs in industries facing massive shortages. We’re throwing all of that away, to the detriment of our communities and the U.S. economy,” stated Nan Wu, research director of the American Immigration Council.

According to 2023 data, of the 300,000 individuals from the countries impacted by the travel ban, 82 percent were employed, particularly in sectors already grappling with labor shortages, such as hospitality, construction, and manufacturing. The manufacturing sector alone is projected to face a shortfall of 1.9 million workers by 2033.

“The United States absolutely needs strong screening procedures to protect national security, but this travel ban isn’t how you do that. The Trump administration is trying to sell this policy as a security measure, but when you dig into the justifications, they don’t add up,” remarked Jeremy Robbins, executive director of the American Immigration Council. “Many of the targeted countries had fewer than 500 visa overstays last year. This isn’t about keeping America safe; it’s about keeping certain people out.”

While the original travel ban enacted in 2017 prompted widespread public protests, the 2025 version has seen a more subdued response, attributed to its gradual implementation and expanded exemptions. However, the report emphasizes that the negative impacts remain significant.

“This quieter version of the ban is deeply harmful,” Robbins added. “It separates families, blocks international talent, and hurts communities across the country. The absence of airport protests doesn’t mean the harm isn’t real; it’s just happening more quietly and more bureaucratically.”

Reports suggest that the administration is contemplating the addition of 36 more countries to the travel ban. If implemented, this could prevent tens of thousands of additional individuals from entering the United States, further exacerbating the economic, social, and diplomatic repercussions.

The countries currently affected by the travel ban include:

All travel banned:

Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.

Visas sharply restricted:

Venezuela, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, and Turkmenistan.

This report underscores the far-reaching implications of the travel ban, highlighting the need for a reevaluation of policies that impact both the economy and the lives of individuals seeking opportunities in the United States.

Source: Original article

-+=