Armed Kurdish Fighters Attempt to Breach Iran Border Amid Protests

Armed Kurdish fighters have attempted to breach the Iran-Iraq border amid ongoing protests in Iran, raising concerns about regional instability, according to reports.

Turkey’s intelligence agency, MIT, has alerted Iran’s Revolutionary Guard about Kurdish fighters attempting to cross the Iran-Iraq border during a period of significant unrest in Iran. This development has heightened fears that the turmoil within Iran could attract foreign militants, potentially destabilizing the broader region.

Reports indicate that armed Kurdish separatist groups have made recent attempts to enter Iran from Iraq, coinciding with a government crackdown on nationwide protests against the Iranian regime. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is leading the government’s response to these protests, which have been marked by widespread dissent.

The Tasnim News Agency has reported that militia groups operating in Iraq have crossed into western and northwestern Iran. This situation has raised alarms among Iranian officials, who claim that the Kurdish fighters are trying to exploit the ongoing unrest to further destabilize the country.

According to Reuters, three sources, including a senior Iranian official, confirmed that Turkey’s MIT warned the IRGC about the Kurdish fighters’ movements. Following the attempted border crossing, clashes reportedly broke out, with Iranian officials accusing the fighters of trying to take advantage of the chaotic situation.

The Council on Foreign Relations estimates that approximately 30 million Kurds reside in the Middle East, primarily in Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. This demographic reality adds complexity to the regional dynamics, especially as Turkey has designated Kurdish militant groups in northern Iraq as terrorist organizations and has conducted military operations against them.

In a notable development, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) announced in 2025 its intention to disarm and conclude its long-standing conflict with Turkey. However, tensions remain high, and Turkey’s military continues to target PKK bases in Iraq.

Amid these tensions, Iranian authorities have alleged that the Kurdish fighters involved in the recent border attempts were dispatched from Iraq and Turkey. The Iranian regime has reportedly requested both governments to halt any transfer of fighters or weapons into Iran.

The crackdown on protests in Iran has resulted in a rising death toll, which has reached at least 2,571, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency. In light of the escalating violence, former President Donald Trump stated that he had been informed that the killings had ceased and expressed skepticism about any plans for large-scale executions. When asked about his sources, Trump referred to them as “very important sources on the other side.”

In a related development, Iran closed its airspace to most flights on Wednesday, with the closure lasting just over two hours, as reported by flight-tracking website Flightradar24.

This series of events underscores the precarious situation in Iran and the potential for regional instability as various factions seek to exploit the ongoing unrest. The international community is closely monitoring the situation, as the implications of these developments could extend far beyond Iran’s borders.

As tensions continue to rise, the actions of Kurdish fighters and the responses from both Iran and Turkey will be critical in shaping the future of the region, according to Reuters.

BioMarin Appoints Indian-American Arpit Davé as Chief Digital Officer

BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. has appointed Arpit Davé as its new Chief Digital and Information Officer, tasked with enhancing the company’s technology strategy and digital transformation efforts.

BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., a prominent global biotechnology firm specializing in rare diseases, has announced the appointment of Arpit Davé as Executive Vice President and Chief Digital and Information Officer. This newly created position underscores the company’s commitment to advancing its enterprise technology strategy.

In his role, Davé will focus on reimagining and executing BioMarin’s technology initiatives, data science, and digital transformation efforts. His leadership is expected to create significant value for patients, employees, and shareholders, as stated by the San Rafael, California-based company.

With over 20 years of experience in information technology and artificial intelligence (AI) within the biopharmaceutical sector, Davé is recognized as a proven leader. His career has been marked by a strong track record of driving patient-centered organizations toward measurable business growth and profitability.

Before joining BioMarin, Davé served as a technology executive at Amgen, Inc. for the past seven and a half years. In his most recent roles there, he led teams focused on digital transformation through AI and innovative digital technologies, positioning the company to remain competitive in an evolving landscape.

Davé’s previous experience includes leadership roles at Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck, where he concentrated on CIO leadership, data science, and research and development.

He holds a Master of Science in Industrial Engineering from the University of Texas and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Sardar Patel University in Gujarat, India.

“Arpit is a visionary thinker and talented leader who brings to this role a deep understanding of the biopharmaceutical industry and a track record of using technology and AI to deliver for patients and the business,” said Alexander Hardy, President and Chief Executive Officer of BioMarin.

Hardy emphasized that Davé will be responsible for building a strategic vision and roadmap, deploying technologies that will enhance and differentiate BioMarin’s operations across various sectors, including research and development, manufacturing, and commercial organizations.

Expressing his enthusiasm for the new role, Davé stated, “I have long admired BioMarin’s dedication to people living with rare diseases, and I am excited to work as part of this team to create undeniable value for patients, employees, and shareholders.”

He further added, “I am honored to join BioMarin at this pivotal moment where the convergence of biology, data, and AI offers unprecedented potential; my focus will be on empowering our world-class teams and driving innovation to translate these capabilities into faster insights and the accelerated delivery of life-changing therapies to the patients who depend on us.”

Founded in 1997, BioMarin has established a strong reputation for innovation, boasting eight commercial therapies and a robust clinical and preclinical pipeline, according to the company’s release.

This strategic appointment reflects BioMarin’s ongoing commitment to leveraging technology and data to enhance its operations and improve patient outcomes.

According to The American Bazaar, Davé’s leadership is expected to play a crucial role in the company’s future endeavors.

Mamdani Appoints Lekha Sunder as Indian-American Communications Staff Member

Mayor Zohran Mamdani has appointed Lekha Sunder as New York’s Deputy Communications Director, focusing on messaging and communications strategy for the city government.

NEW YORK, NY – City Hall has announced that Mayor Zohran Mamdani has appointed Lekha Sunder as New York’s Deputy Communications Director. In this role, Sunder will be responsible for shaping messaging and coordinating communications strategy across the city government.

Sunder joined Mamdani’s primary campaign in February, where she played a pivotal role in expanding the campaign’s reach through traditional, digital, and earned media. Her efforts significantly strengthened the campaign’s media presence and helped align its messaging as it gained traction among voters.

Before her work with the Mamdani campaign, Sunder gained valuable experience in communications while working for Vice President Kamala Harris. She was involved in Harris’ presidential campaign in Pennsylvania, where she further developed her skills in strategic messaging and public relations.

At just 26 years old, Sunder is a recent graduate of Yale University, where she majored in Global Affairs. During her time at Yale, she also contributed as a reporter for the Yale Daily News, which likely enhanced her understanding of media narratives and the importance of effective communication.

In her new position at City Hall, Sunder will report to Communications Director Anna Bahr, a veteran staffer with a background in working for Bernie Sanders. This collaboration is expected to bring a fresh perspective to the city’s communications efforts.

According to India West, Sunder’s appointment reflects a commitment to innovative communication strategies within the Mamdani administration.

General Motors Reports $7.6 Billion Loss in Electric Vehicle Business

General Motors is set to incur an additional $6 billion in charges related to its electric vehicle operations, bringing total losses to $7.6 billion amid a challenging market environment.

General Motors Co. is facing significant financial challenges in its electric vehicle (EV) business, announcing an additional $6 billion in charges linked to production cutbacks in its EV and battery operations. This decision comes as the automaker grapples with a weakening market for electric vehicles in the United States.

The latest announcement, made on Thursday, brings GM’s total writedowns related to its ambitious investment in battery-electric cars to $7.6 billion. This figure follows smaller charges disclosed in October, reflecting the ongoing financial fallout as GM reassesses its EV strategy.

Declining EV sales have been a major factor in GM’s decision to cut production. Contributing to this downturn are the expiration of federal incentives and a decrease in consumer demand. Fourth-quarter figures from 2025 indicated a notable drop in deliveries, prompting the company to adjust its output and product strategy accordingly. The recent charges also account for costs associated with idled production capacity, supply chain realignments, and other operational adjustments.

Industry analysts observe that GM’s write-downs are part of a larger trend affecting the U.S. auto sector, where manufacturers are struggling to scale EV production while maintaining financial performance. The electric vehicle industry is currently experiencing a slowdown after years of rapid growth, particularly in the United States, where federal incentives, such as the $7,500 EV tax credit, have recently expired. This reduction in subsidies has led to declining deliveries, forcing automakers, including GM, to modify production plans, delay model launches, and absorb significant financial charges.

Moreover, the market is witnessing increased competition from international manufacturers, particularly Chinese companies, which are offering EVs at lower prices and potentially capturing a larger share of the market. As a result, automakers are facing operational and financial challenges, with production cutbacks and idle factories becoming increasingly common. Investments in battery technology and next-generation EV platforms are also fraught with uncertainty regarding timing and returns.

Analysts highlight the difficulty of balancing investment with profitability in a market characterized by slowing consumer adoption, reduced incentives, and economic pressures such as inflation and rising interest rates. Structural issues further complicate growth in the EV sector, including limited charging infrastructure, regional policy shifts, and changing consumer preferences in the used-car market. Despite these challenges, the EV sector remains strategically important for long-term mobility trends.

The recent disclosure underscores the upheaval caused by previous federal policy changes, including moves by the Trump administration to eliminate federal support for electric vehicles. As consumers continue to favor gasoline-powered vehicles, GM and its competitors have invested billions in EVs over the past decade to comply with stringent environmental regulations and to align with their optimistic projections of consumer demand.

Even well-capitalized automakers are navigating significant uncertainty as they strive to balance long-term strategic goals with immediate financial pressures. Factors such as shifting consumer preferences, evolving regulatory requirements, and fluctuating economic conditions contribute to a highly dynamic environment that can swiftly alter projections and investment plans.

The path forward for electric vehicles is likely to be uneven, characterized by periods of rapid adoption followed by market slowdowns and necessary recalibrations. Ultimately, the industry’s success will hinge on its ability to adapt to changing demand, regulatory landscapes, and technological advancements while maintaining financial resilience in an unpredictable market, according to The American Bazaar.

Trump Accuses India of Reducing Russian Crude Imports to Satisfy Him

U.S. President Donald Trump recently claimed that India has reduced its imports of Russian crude oil to appease Washington, warning of potential tariffs if the trend continues.

U.S. President Donald Trump, during a press interaction on January 4, 2026, asserted that India has decreased its imports of Russian crude oil in recent months, primarily to appease the United States and facilitate a broader trade agreement between the two nations. His comments reflect the growing tensions between the U.S. and India, particularly as issues related to energy, sanctions, and tariffs become increasingly intertwined.

“They wanted to make me happy,” Trump stated, referring to India’s alleged decision to scale back its purchases from Moscow. He praised Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as “a very good man,” emphasizing that Modi understood Washington’s dissatisfaction with India’s ongoing Russian oil imports. “He knew I was unhappy, and it was important to make me happy. They do trade with us, and we can raise tariffs very quickly — and it would be bad for them,” Trump warned.

Trump further cautioned that additional tariffs could be swiftly imposed if India continues to buy oil from Russia, reinforcing his administration’s hardline stance on countries maintaining energy ties with Moscow.

Senator Lindsey Graham publicly supported Trump’s assertion, stating that India’s declining Russian oil imports were specifically mentioned by India’s Ambassador to the United States, Vinay Kwatra, during a meeting in December 2025.

“I was at the Indian Ambassador’s house about a month ago, and all he wanted to talk about was how India is buying less Russian oil,” Graham noted. He added that the ambassador urged him to relay this information to President Trump in hopes of securing relief from the 25% U.S. tariff imposed alongside reciprocal duties.

“This stuff works,” Graham remarked, suggesting that trade pressure has influenced India’s energy decisions.

Data indicates that India has indeed reduced its Russian oil imports, showing a sharp decline of approximately 38% in value and 31% in volume in October 2025 compared to the previous year. However, analysts emphasize that India had already begun diversifying its crude sources well before the U.S. tariffs were enacted.

Energy experts argue that India’s oil procurement strategy is influenced by a combination of factors, including price, supply security, refining compatibility, and long-term contracts, rather than solely by political pressure. They contend that the reduction in Russian crude reflects market dynamics and risk management rather than a unilateral policy shift aimed at appeasing Washington.

The controversy arises as U.S. lawmakers advocate for stricter sanctions on Russia’s energy revenues. Senator Graham, along with Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, is a leading sponsor of a bill proposing punitive tariffs of up to 500% on countries that continue to purchase Russian oil or uranium.

Both senators were part of a bipartisan U.S. Senate delegation hosted by Ambassador Kwatra at the Indian Embassy in Washington on December 2, 2025. This meeting underscored the increasing U.S. pressure on major economies to further isolate Moscow economically.

India’s External Affairs Ministry did not respond to requests for comment regarding Trump’s remarks. However, in previous statements, New Delhi has criticized unilateral sanctions as an example of “double standards,” highlighting that several Western nations, including the United States, continue indirect trade in Russian energy, uranium, and critical minerals.

Indian officials have consistently maintained that India’s energy policy is guided by national interests, affordability, and supply stability—especially given the country’s large and growing energy demand.

Trump has previously claimed that India promised to eliminate Russian oil imports entirely, a statement that Indian officials have never publicly confirmed. His latest comments suggest that energy trade has become a bargaining chip in broader negotiations concerning tariffs, market access, and bilateral trade agreements.

As Washington intensifies its tariff threats and sanctions rhetoric, this episode highlights the delicate balance in India–U.S. relations: a strong strategic alignment on many global issues, yet persistent friction when economic sovereignty and geopolitical pressures intersect.

Whether India will further reduce its reliance on Russian crude remains uncertain. However, it is evident that oil, tariffs, and diplomacy are now intricately linked, with implications that extend far beyond energy markets, according to Global Net News.

Aspen Neuroscience Appoints Indian-American Revati Shreeniwas as CMO

Revati Shreeniwas has been appointed Chief Medical Officer of Aspen Neuroscience to advance the company’s cell therapy for Parkinson’s disease, enhancing its commercial readiness.

Aspen Neuroscience, a clinical-stage biotechnology company, has announced the appointment of Revati Shreeniwas as Chief Medical Officer (CMO). Her role will focus on accelerating the late-stage development and commercial readiness of the company’s innovative cell therapy for Parkinson’s disease.

This leadership change is part of Aspen’s strategy to transition its programs from clinical trials to market with integrity and purpose. The San Diego-based company is pioneering autologous regenerative therapies aimed at addressing neurodegenerative diseases.

Dr. Shreeniwas brings a wealth of experience to her new position, having received her medical education from Armed Forces Medical College in Pune, India. She possesses extensive expertise in neuromuscular and central nervous system (CNS) diseases, orphan indications, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, as well as gene therapy.

With over 20 years of experience in the biopharma industry, Dr. Shreeniwas is a board-certified physician executive who has held multiple roles as CMO. She has a proven track record of advancing clinical programs from pre-Investigational New Drug (IND) applications through to registration, successfully navigating global regulatory pathways, and shaping clinical and medical strategies for venture-backed companies.

Throughout her career, she has designed and led more than 40 global clinical trials, including registrational studies. Her contributions have been pivotal in the approval and commercialization of several notable therapies, including Rytary for Parkinson’s disease, Sunosi for sleep disorders, Esbriet for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and Tracleer for pulmonary hypertension.

Expressing her enthusiasm for her new role, Dr. Shreeniwas stated, “Aspen’s autologous iPSC-derived approach is redefining what’s possible in neurodegenerative disease. I’m excited to help deliver a rigorous registrational program for Parkinson’s patients, partnering across clinical, regulatory, technical operations, and medical affairs.”

Before joining Aspen, Dr. Shreeniwas held senior clinical positions at several biopharmaceutical companies, including Cystetic Medicines, Excision BioTherapeutics, Bright Minds Biosciences, and Soleno Therapeutics. She has also held faculty appointments at prestigious institutions such as Columbia University and Stanford University.

Aspen’s investigational therapy, ANPD001, is recognized as the most advanced autologous cell therapy in the United States for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. The company’s personalized approach eliminates the need for immunosuppressive (IS) drugs, which are typically required to mitigate the body’s immune response against foreign cells. This innovative strategy aims to reduce IS-associated adverse events, eliminate IS drug-monitoring requirements, and facilitate dosing for patients who have contraindications to IS therapies.

ANPD001 has received Fast Track designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), highlighting its potential significance in treating Parkinson’s disease. The ASPIRO trial, which is the first multi-patient, multi-center clinical trial of an autologous cell therapy for this condition, is currently underway. It is evaluating the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of ANPD001 in levodopa-responsive patients aged 50 to 70. Primary endpoints are expected to be reported at 12 months, with long-term follow-up extending up to 15 years.

This strategic appointment of Dr. Shreeniwas is expected to significantly enhance Aspen Neuroscience’s efforts in bringing innovative solutions to patients suffering from Parkinson’s disease, according to The American Bazaar.

Pakistan Expands Lobbying Efforts in the U.S. Through Think Tanks

Pakistan has increased its lobbying and public relations efforts in the United States, as revealed by recent disclosures under the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

WASHINGTON, DC – Pakistan has intensified its lobbying and public relations activities in the United States, according to recent disclosures filed under the U.S. Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). These filings detail contracts and payments amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars involving the Pakistani government and organizations linked to the country.

The outreach efforts target various entities, including the U.S. Congress, the executive branch, think tanks, and media outlets. One notable filing indicates that the Islamabad Policy Research Institute, a think tank affiliated with Pakistan’s National Security Division, allocated $900,000 for lobbying and public policy outreach in the United States. The disclosure specifies that Hyperfocal Communications LLC was registered as a subcontractor to Team Eagle Consulting LLC to carry out this work, which aims to enhance U.S.-Pakistan relations.

Another significant filing reveals that the Embassy of Pakistan in Washington entered into a contract with Ervin Graves Strategy Group LLC, effective October 1, 2025. This agreement stipulates a monthly payment of $25,000 for an initial three-month term. The planned activities include outreach to members of Congress and executive branch officials, as well as engagement with policy groups and think tanks. The scope of work covers various topics, including regional stability, economic development, democratic reform, trade promotion, tourism, and Pakistan’s potential in rare-earth minerals.

In addition, separate filings indicate that Javelin Advisors LLC was registered in April to represent Pakistan under a formal consulting agreement dated April 24. Javelin disclosed a monthly fee of $50,000 for its services, which involve communicating Pakistan’s positions on regional and global issues to the U.S. executive branch, Congress, and the public. Key issues include the Jammu and Kashmir dispute and Pakistan-India relations.

The disclosures are expected to be closely monitored in India, especially regarding lobbying activities that aim to communicate Pakistan’s stance on the Jammu and Kashmir issue and its relations with India. The filings also reference a framework document circulated in May that outlines proposed cooperation between Pakistan and the United States on rare earth minerals and critical metals. This document describes potential collaboration in exploration, mining, processing, and integration into global supply chains, with an indicative commercial value of up to $1 trillion.

Furthermore, the Embassy of Pakistan hired Qorvis Holding Inc. in May for public relations services. The disclosure lists media outreach and narrative development among the activities planned under this contract. Under U.S. law, foreign governments and related entities must publicly disclose their lobbying and public relations arrangements. These filings serve as records of contracts, activities, and payments made on their behalf.

As Pakistan continues to expand its lobbying footprint in the United States, the implications of these efforts will likely resonate across geopolitical landscapes, particularly in South Asia.

According to IANS.

Dominica Agrees to Accept U.S. Asylum Seekers Amid Deportation Expansion

The U.S. has reached an agreement with Dominica to potentially transfer asylum seekers to the Caribbean nation, following similar arrangements with Belize and Paraguay.

The United States has reportedly reached an agreement with the Commonwealth of Dominica that may allow for the transfer of certain asylum seekers arriving at the U.S. border to the Caribbean nation. This development follows similar pacts established with Belize and Paraguay.

Dominica’s Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit described the agreement as “one of the primary areas of collaboration” between the two governments. This comes in the wake of recent U.S. entry restrictions imposed on Dominican nationals. Skerrit noted that he has been engaged in ongoing discussions with U.S. officials since the White House announced partial visa limitations on December 16. However, he did not disclose specific details regarding the number of asylum seekers that could be sent to Dominica or when such transfers might commence.

In his remarks, Skerrit emphasized the importance of ensuring that Dominica does not receive individuals who could pose a threat to public safety. He stated that his discussions with U.S. authorities have included “careful deliberations of the need to avoid receiving violent individuals or individuals who will compromise the security of Dominica.”

The government of Dominica continues to address the broader context of U.S. travel restrictions. It has expressed its commitment to engaging with the United States Embassy in Bridgetown and the State Department in Washington in an effort to reverse the decision to impose partial travel restrictions on Dominican nationals, which are set to take effect on January 1, 2026.

In a clarification, the government noted that U.S. authorities have indicated that Dominican nationals who hold valid U.S. visas—including those for tourism, business, and education—will still be able to travel to the U.S. and its territories as per standard immigration laws. This announcement reassures that lawful travel will continue under existing regulations.

According to reports, the agreement with Dominica aligns with broader U.S. efforts under President Donald Trump’s administration to encourage other nations to share the responsibility for handling asylum seekers.

However, some members of Dominica’s political opposition are expressing concerns and seeking clarity on the agreement. Thomson Fontaine, the leader of the main opposition party, stated that “the prime minister still has not told the Dominican public what exactly he has agreed to, in terms of the numbers of persons that are going to come to Dominica, where will they be housed, how will they be taken care of.”

With a population of approximately 72,000, there are growing concerns about whether Dominica has adequate resources to accommodate an influx of asylum seekers. Fontaine’s remarks reflect a broader unease among the public regarding the implications of this agreement.

While discussions continue, officials have yet to provide detailed information about the timeline for the implementation of this plan or how it will be executed.

According to The Associated Press, the situation remains fluid as both governments navigate the complexities of this agreement.

US-Venezuela Crisis: Implications for India’s Energy and Global Strategy

The recent U.S. military intervention in Venezuela has significant implications for India’s energy strategy and its position in the global geopolitical landscape.

As the United States executed a military operation in Venezuela earlier this month, capturing President Nicolás Maduro, Indian officials and business leaders are closely monitoring the unfolding situation from nearly 8,000 miles away.

The operation, dubbed “Operation Absolute Resolve,” commenced on January 3 and involved over 150 aircraft targeting Venezuelan installations. The raid culminated in Maduro’s capture and subsequent transfer to New York, where he faces charges related to narcoterrorism. This unprecedented military action has ignited a global discourse on issues of sovereignty, international law, and the shifting dynamics of power within global energy markets.

In response to these developments, India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) issued a carefully crafted statement expressing “deep concern” regarding the crisis. The ministry called for all parties involved to engage in peaceful dialogue to stabilize the region. Notably, New Delhi refrained from directly condemning the U.S. actions, instead reaffirming its commitment to the “well-being and safety of the people of Venezuela.”

The geopolitical ramifications of the U.S. intervention extend well beyond South America. Analysts suggest that this move has significantly undermined China’s influence in Venezuela, a nation where Beijing has invested billions as part of a strategic partnership. In reaction, China condemned the U.S. military action, labeling it a violation of international law and emphasizing the necessity of upholding the security of sovereign nations.

Some international observers are drawing connections between the dramatic events in Venezuela and broader strategic tensions involving China, particularly concerning Taiwan. While experts believe that the U.S. intervention is unlikely to provoke a direct Chinese military response regarding Taiwan, it may embolden Beijing to assert its territorial claims more aggressively as part of a larger strategy to enhance its global influence.

For India, the immediate economic impact of the Venezuela crisis appears limited. A recent analysis of Indian energy markets indicated that India’s crude oil imports from Venezuela have plummeted to approximately 0.3 percent of total imports, primarily due to sanctions and a diversified sourcing strategy that includes Russia, the Middle East, and other regions. This minimal exposure has effectively shielded New Delhi from immediate supply disruptions.

However, the crisis raises critical strategic questions for India’s energy security and market stability. Should international sanctions on Venezuela be lifted and political stability restored, India may find itself in a position to reconsider investments or re-engage in Venezuelan energy projects that were previously seized or suspended due to U.S. sanctions.

Economists caution that the ongoing turbulence could introduce short-term volatility in crude oil markets, which may subsequently influence inflation rates and the value of the Indian currency. Nonetheless, the structural impact on India’s economy remains limited for the time being.

As New Delhi navigates its position between global superpowers, the Venezuela crisis highlights the intricate relationship between geopolitics and energy markets in an increasingly unstable international environment. The situation serves as a reminder of the complexities that nations face as they strive to protect their interests while engaging in the global arena.

According to American Bazaar, the unfolding crisis in Venezuela will continue to shape India’s energy strategy and its geopolitical maneuvering in the coming years.

Indian-American Ravi Bhalla Appointed to Lead Dundon’s Infrastructure Finance Division

Ravi Bhalla, the first Sikh mayor of Hoboken, New Jersey, will join Dundon Advisers LLC as Managing Director to lead the firm’s infrastructure finance business starting January 15.

Ravinder “Ravi” S. Bhalla, who made history as the first Sikh mayor of Hoboken, New Jersey, is set to join Dundon Advisers LLC on January 15 as Managing Director. In this role, he will lead the firm’s infrastructure finance business and will also be associated with its affiliates, Dundon Markets LLC and IslandDundon LLC.

At 52 years old, Bhalla transitions to this new position after completing his second and final term as mayor. He is also beginning his first term as a member of the New Jersey State Assembly, where he will represent Hoboken and parts of Jersey City.

Born and raised in New Jersey, Bhalla has been a prominent figure in local politics. He won the mayoral election in 2017 and was re-elected in 2021 without opposition. Prior to his tenure as mayor, he served for eight years on the Hoboken City Council.

Bhalla’s professional background includes experience as an attorney in private practice. He holds an AB from the University of California at Berkeley, an MSc from the London School of Economics, and a JD from Tulane University Law School.

Matthew Dundon, principal of Dundon, expressed enthusiasm about Bhalla’s appointment, stating, “We are excited to offer our private- and public-sector clients Ravi’s tremendous leadership in bringing critical infrastructure investments from concept to reality.” He emphasized that Bhalla’s experience will enhance the firm’s capabilities in both local and global infrastructure projects.

In his new role, Bhalla aims to leverage his extensive experience in infrastructure investment. He stated on LinkedIn, “I will be serving as a leader in the firm’s Infrastructure Finance business, advising institutional clients on financing strategies and capital solutions for large-scale infrastructure public and private projects.”

Bhalla elaborated on his responsibilities, noting that his role will involve navigating the intersection of capital markets, public finance, and infrastructure delivery. He aims to help organizations bring critical projects from concept to reality through thoughtful project feasibility reviews, analysis, structuring, and the alignment of public-private partnerships.

Throughout his career, Bhalla has focused on the entire lifecycle of infrastructure investment, from prioritization and design to funding strategy and execution. He highlighted a notable achievement during his time as mayor: Hoboken’s leadership in the Rebuild by Design – Hudson River (RBD-HR) initiative. This nationally recognized resilience project integrates engineering, green infrastructure, and community-centered design to protect the region from climate-related risks.

Bhalla emphasized that such efforts rely on strong policy and planning, as well as innovative climate finance approaches. He noted the importance of leveraging federal and state funding, forging partnerships with the private sector, and structuring funding mechanisms to deliver impactful projects at scale.

As Bhalla embarks on this new chapter with Dundon Advisers, he brings a wealth of experience and a commitment to advancing smart infrastructure investment, supported by capital markets and governmental collaboration.

According to The American Bazaar, Bhalla’s leadership is expected to significantly contribute to the firm’s mission of facilitating critical infrastructure projects.

Deadly Superbug Spreads Across U.S. Amid Growing Drug Resistance

A new review highlights the growing threat of the drug-resistant fungus Candida auris in U.S. hospitals, while researchers identify potential weaknesses that could lead to new treatments.

Researchers have uncovered a possible vulnerability in the deadly hospital superbug Candida auris (C. auris), which could pave the way for new treatments for this drug-resistant fungal infection. The findings come as the fungus continues to spread rapidly through U.S. hospitals and poses an increasing threat globally.

Described as a “superbug fungus,” C. auris has garnered attention from health officials due to its ability to resist human immune systems. A recent scientific review published by researchers from the Hackensack Meridian Center for Discovery and Innovation (CDI) emphasizes the urgent need for new strategies to combat this pathogen. The review was published in early December and reinforces previous warnings from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which has labeled C. auris an “urgent antimicrobial threat.” This designation marks the first time a fungal pathogen has received such a classification.

According to the CDC, approximately 7,000 cases of C. auris were reported across dozens of U.S. states in 2025, with the fungus identified in at least 60 countries worldwide. The review, conducted by Dr. Neeraj Chauhan of the Hackensack Meridian CDI, Dr. Anuradha Chowdhary from the University of Delhi’s Medical Mycology Unit, and Dr. Michail Lionakis, chief of the clinical mycology program at the National Institutes of Health, highlights the challenges in containing the pathogen. The researchers point out that outdated diagnostic methods and limited treatment options hinder effective responses to C. auris outbreaks.

The researchers stress the importance of developing “novel antifungal agents with broad-spectrum activity against human fungal pathogens,” as well as improving diagnostic tests and creating immune- and vaccine-based adjunct modalities for treating high-risk patients. They also advocate for increased awareness of fungal diseases and the establishment of better surveillance mechanisms, particularly in resource-limited countries. These advancements are crucial for improving outcomes for patients affected by opportunistic fungal infections.

C. auris was first identified in 2009 from a patient’s ear sample in Japan and has since spread to numerous countries, including the United States. Outbreaks of the fungus have led to the shutdown of some hospital intensive care units, underscoring its potential severity. The greatest risk from C. auris is posed to individuals who are critically ill, particularly those on ventilators or with compromised immune systems. Estimates suggest that about half of infected patients may die from the infection.

Unlike many other fungi, C. auris can survive on human skin and adhere to hospital surfaces and medical equipment, facilitating its spread in healthcare environments. Dr. Marc Siegel, a senior medical analyst at Fox News and clinical professor of medicine at NYU Langone, noted that the fungus is resistant to multiple antifungal drugs and often spreads through equipment used on immunocompromised patients, such as ventilators and catheters. Moreover, C. auris is frequently misdiagnosed, which can delay necessary treatment and infection control measures.

Dr. Siegel has previously highlighted the challenges posed by the symptoms of C. auris, which can include fever, chills, and body aches—symptoms that are common to many infections, leading to potential misdiagnoses. He indicated that research is ongoing to develop new treatments, as only four major classes of antifungal drugs are currently available, with C. auris demonstrating resistance to many of them. Although three new antifungal drugs have been approved or are in late-stage trials, researchers caution that drug development has struggled to keep pace with the fungus’s rapid evolution.

Despite these alarming findings, there is a glimmer of hope. In separate research published in December, scientists at the University of Exeter in England discovered a potential weakness in C. auris while studying the fungus in a living-host model. The research team found that during infection, the fungus activates specific genes to scavenge iron, a crucial nutrient for its survival. They believe that drugs targeting this process could halt infections or even allow for the repurposing of existing medications.

“We think our research may have revealed an Achilles’ heel in this lethal pathogen during active infection,” said Dr. Hugh Gifford, a clinical lecturer at the University of Exeter and co-author of the study. As researchers continue to explore the complexities of C. auris, health officials emphasize the importance of strict infection control measures, rapid detection, and sustained investment in new treatments.

Health experts want to reassure the public that C. auris primarily poses a threat to individuals with weakened immune systems and is not a danger to healthy individuals. As the situation evolves, ongoing research and vigilance will be essential in combating this formidable pathogen.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the CDI researchers and additional experts for further commentary on this pressing health issue. According to Fox News Digital, the fight against C. auris continues as researchers strive to develop effective treatments and preventive measures.

Kamala Harris Criticizes Trump Administration’s Actions Against Venezuela’s Maduro

Former Vice President Kamala Harris criticizes the Trump administration’s capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, calling the operation “unlawful” and “unwise,” while raising concerns about potential chaos and oil interests.

Former Vice President Kamala Harris condemned the Trump administration’s recent capture of Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro and his wife, labeling the operation as both “unlawful” and “unwise.” In a detailed post on X, Harris acknowledged Maduro’s reputation as a “brutal” and “illegitimate” leader but argued that the actions taken by President Donald Trump do not enhance the safety, strength, or affordability of America.

“Donald Trump’s actions in Venezuela do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable,” Harris stated. “That Maduro is a brutal, illegitimate dictator does not change the fact that this action was both unlawful and unwise. We’ve seen this movie before.” She expressed concern that interventions framed as efforts for regime change or securing oil resources often devolve into chaos, ultimately costing American families.

Harris’s remarks came shortly after the Trump administration confirmed that Maduro and his wife had been captured and transported out of Venezuela as part of “Operation Absolute Resolve.” The former vice president also accused the administration of being driven by oil interests rather than genuine efforts to combat drug trafficking or promote democracy.

“The American people do not want this, and they are tired of being lied to,” Harris asserted. “This is not about drugs or democracy. It is about oil and Donald Trump’s desire to play the regional strongman.” She criticized Trump for pardoning a convicted drug trafficker and sidelining Venezuela’s legitimate opposition while pursuing deals with Maduro’s associates.

Rumored as a potential Democratic contender for the 2028 presidential race, Harris further accused Trump of jeopardizing U.S. troops and destabilizing the region. “The President is putting troops at risk, spending billions, destabilizing a region, and offering no legal authority, no exit plan, and no benefit at home,” she said. “America needs leadership whose priorities are lowering costs for working families, enforcing the rule of law, strengthening alliances, and — most importantly — putting the American people first.”

Maduro and his wife were transported to the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn late Saturday after being processed by the DEA in Manhattan. Earlier in the day, Trump stated that the U.S. government would “run” Venezuela “until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition.”

Harris’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding her statements.

According to Fox News Digital, Harris’s comments reflect a growing concern among some political leaders about the implications of U.S. foreign policy in Venezuela and its potential impact on American interests.

H-1B Visa Delays Prompt Amazon to Adjust Policies for Indian Employees

Amazon has temporarily relaxed its return-to-office rules for employees stranded in India due to H-1B visa delays, allowing them to work remotely until early March.

Amazon has announced a temporary relaxation of its return-to-office policy for a select group of employees who are currently unable to return to the United States due to visa backlogs. This decision comes amid increasing scrutiny of U.S. immigration policies, particularly affecting H-1B visa holders.

According to an internal memo obtained by Business Insider, the company is permitting employees stuck in India because of visa delays to continue working remotely from their home country until early March. This adjustment provides short-term relief for those affected workers who had anticipated returning to the U.S. on schedule. Despite this exception, Amazon is continuing to enforce stricter in-office attendance requirements for its workforce.

The memo indicates that this temporary measure is specifically designed to address the disruptions caused by immigration issues and does not represent a broader change in Amazon’s remote work policy. Employees who qualify for this arrangement are, however, subject to significant restrictions. They are prohibited from writing code, participating in strategic decision-making, or engaging directly with customers during this period.

Amazon is not the only company grappling with the repercussions of visa delays. Many organizations across corporate America are adjusting to the rapid changes implemented during the Trump administration regarding the H-1B visa program. One of the most impactful changes has been the requirement for consular officers to scrutinize visa applicants’ social media activity before granting approval, which has significantly slowed processing times.

As a result, U.S. embassies and consulates in various countries have postponed visa appointments by several months. This situation has left many employees stranded abroad longer than anticipated, forcing employers to find creative solutions to maintain productivity.

The implications of these delays extend beyond Amazon. In recent weeks, major U.S. companies such as Google, Apple, and Microsoft have issued internal travel advisories. These advisories caution visa-holding employees against international travel, reflecting concerns that routine trips could lead to extended absences due to ongoing visa renewal and reentry delays.

Under Amazon’s standard policy, employees traveling overseas for visa renewals are allowed to work remotely for up to 20 business days. This is a limited exception to the company’s general requirement for employees to be in the office five days a week. However, the new guidance expands this allowance significantly.

According to the memo posted on Amazon’s internal HR portal on December 17, any employee who was in India as of December 13 and is awaiting a rescheduled visa appointment can continue to work remotely until March 2. This temporary extension highlights how immigration delays are compelling even the most office-centric companies to adapt their policies.

As the situation evolves, it remains to be seen how companies will continue to navigate the complexities of immigration and work policies in a changing landscape.

For further details, refer to Business Insider.

Cancer Drug Combination Shows Promise for Treatment-Resistant Patients

A new drug combination shows promise for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients resistant to standard therapies, offering hope for improved outcomes in this aggressive cancer.

Researchers at Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) have made a significant breakthrough in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a particularly aggressive form of leukemia that affects over 20,000 Americans each year. Their findings suggest that a novel drug combination could help patients who do not respond to traditional therapies.

The study involved analyzing samples from more than 300 AML patients, revealing that pairing venetoclax—a drug commonly used to treat leukemia—with palbociclib, which is typically used for breast cancer, produced stronger and more durable leukemia-fighting effects than venetoclax alone.

Jeffrey Tyner, a professor of cell, developmental, and cancer biology at OHSU’s School of Medicine and the Knight Cancer Institute, emphasized the significance of the findings. “The data show that this drug regimen may be especially effective in patients whose tumors exhibit features that cause resistance to the current standard of care, frontline therapies,” he stated.

The research team initially explored a wide range of drug combinations without any predetermined favorites. Among all the pairings tested, including existing standard-of-care regimens, the combination of venetoclax and palbociclib emerged as the most promising.

Melissa Stewart, a research assistant professor at OHSU and the lead author of the study, noted, “That really motivated us to dig deeper into why it works so well—and why it appears to overcome resistance seen with current therapy.” The study revealed that AML cells exposed solely to venetoclax could adapt by increasing protein production, allowing them to survive. However, the addition of palbociclib blocked this adaptation, significantly impeding the cancer cells’ ability to thrive.

In preclinical models, the results were striking. While venetoclax alone did not extend survival, the combination treatment resulted in the majority of mice living for 11 to 12 months, with one mouse still alive at the conclusion of the study.

Tyner explained that the study sheds light on the biological mechanisms behind the improved outcomes associated with this new drug combination, paving the way for future clinical trials involving real patients. “Unfortunately, almost everyone will eventually have drug resistance,” he remarked, highlighting the ongoing challenges in treating AML.

Despite the promising initial response rates and improved quality of life reported with the current drug regimen, the five-year survival rate for AML remains low, estimated at only 25% to 40%. “We have a lot of work to do,” Tyner added.

While the data strongly suggest that this new drug combination should be tested in clinical trials, the research team acknowledges that they currently lack data on its clinical activity in AML patients, aside from some anecdotal reports. “So, the biggest limitation is also our desired next step—of testing this new drug combination in clinical trials,” Tyner concluded.

As the medical community continues to seek innovative solutions for AML, this research offers a glimmer of hope for patients facing treatment-resistant forms of the disease.

For further details, refer to the original report from Fox News Digital.

Satya Nadella Predicts 2026 Will Mark Significant Advancements in AI

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella predicts that 2026 will mark a significant transition for artificial intelligence, moving from experimentation to real-world applications.

SEATTLE, WA – Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has emphasized that 2026 will be a pivotal year for artificial intelligence (AI), signaling a shift from initial experimentation and excitement to broader, real-world adoption of the technology.

In a recent blog post, Nadella articulated that the AI industry is evolving beyond mere flashy demonstrations, moving towards a clearer distinction between “spectacle” and “substance.” This evolution aims to enhance understanding of where AI can truly deliver meaningful impact.

While acknowledging the rapid pace of AI development, Nadella noted that the practical application of these powerful systems has not kept pace. He described the current landscape as a phase of “model overhang,” where AI models are advancing faster than our ability to implement them effectively in daily life, business, and society.

“We are still in the opening miles of a marathon,” Nadella remarked, highlighting that despite remarkable progress, much about AI’s future remains uncertain.

He pointed out that many of today’s AI capabilities have yet to translate into tangible outcomes that enhance productivity, decision-making, or human well-being on a large scale. Reflecting on the early days of personal computing, Nadella referenced Steve Jobs’ famous analogy of computers as “bicycles for the mind,” tools designed to enhance human thought and work.

“This idea needs to evolve in the age of AI,” he stated, suggesting that rather than replacing human thinking, AI systems should be crafted to support and amplify it. He envisions AI as cognitive tools that empower individuals to achieve their goals more effectively.

Nadella further argued that the true value of AI does not lie in the power of a model itself, but rather in how individuals choose to utilize it. He urged a shift in the debate surrounding AI outputs, moving away from simplistic judgments of quality and instead focusing on how humans adapt to these new tools in their everyday interactions and decision-making processes.

The Microsoft chief also underscored the necessity for the AI industry to progress beyond merely developing advanced models. He emphasized the importance of constructing comprehensive systems around AI, which include software, workflows, and safeguards that enable the technology to be used reliably and responsibly.

Despite the rapid advancements in AI, Nadella acknowledged that current systems still exhibit rough edges and limitations that require careful management. As the industry prepares for the future, he remains optimistic about the potential of AI to transform various aspects of life, provided that the right frameworks and approaches are established.

According to IANS, Nadella’s insights reflect a broader understanding of the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead in the realm of artificial intelligence.

India’s Innovation Challenge: Bridging Ideas and Product Development

India’s innovation landscape faces significant challenges in transforming research breakthroughs into market-ready products, despite its wealth of talent and resources.

India is at a critical juncture in its economic and technological evolution. The nation is home to world-class scientific talent, esteemed institutions, and one of the fastest-growing startup ecosystems globally. However, despite this wealth of intellectual resources, India grapples with a persistent issue: the inability to convert research breakthroughs into scalable, market-ready products.

This disconnect, often referred to as the “valley of death” in innovation ecosystems, has become increasingly apparent as India aims to establish itself as a global manufacturing and technology hub. Experts suggest that the challenge lies not in a lack of ideas but in a significant misalignment between academia, industry, investors, and government.

India’s academic ecosystem primarily focuses on publishing research papers rather than developing products. Conversely, the industry seeks deployable solutions rather than early-stage prototypes. Investors typically engage only after commercial viability is established. This results in a fragmented pipeline where promising innovations often stall before they can reach the market.

The frustration within the industry is palpable. A founder of a high-tech Indian company expressed to Swarajya, “We have tried to work with lots of different IITs, and in most cases, there is no strong output that comes from these colleges.” Such sentiments reflect a broader structural issue rather than isolated failures.

Dr. Anurag Agrawal of Ashoka University bluntly articulates the challenge: “India has no dearth of bioscience talent, but translating research into real-world health solutions remains a major challenge.” He emphasizes the need to “back people, not just projects,” and to realign incentives toward outcomes that extend beyond academic achievements.

Innovation specialists often highlight a specific bottleneck: the transition from Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 3 to TRL 4, where a lab-tested concept must be validated in real-world conditions. According to innovation strategist Babu Mohanan, “India doesn’t suffer from a shortage of ideas — we suffer from a shortage of products.” He notes that many innovations “never make it beyond the lab door” because the ecosystem is not structured to support the costly, iterative, and risky process of commercialization.

At this critical stage, the convergence of engineering talent, manufacturing partners, regulatory clarity, and patient capital is essential. Unfortunately, in India, these elements rarely align simultaneously.

Despite these challenges, India has produced notable success stories, demonstrating that capability is not the issue, but rather coordination is. One frequently cited example is Prof. Ashok Jhunjhunwala’s work in the telecom sector, where his team successfully reduced telephone costs from ₹40,000 to ₹10,000 by prioritizing affordability alongside innovation. His philosophy of “putting economics before technology” became a cornerstone of India’s telecom revolution.

Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers at IIT Kanpur developed a functional ventilator in just 90 days. This project succeeded due to the convergence of urgency, institutional support, and cross-disciplinary collaboration.

A more structural example is the IIT Madras Research Park, which has completed over 900 joint industry-academia projects. It serves as a national benchmark for how universities can drive innovation when incentives and partnerships are intentionally aligned.

India’s innovation gap is also closely tied to chronic underinvestment. The country allocates only 0.7% of its GDP to research and development, significantly lower than global leaders like South Korea and the United States. Without sustained funding, scaling deep-tech infrastructure remains a formidable challenge.

Former NITI Aayog CEO Amitabh Kant has consistently argued that innovation must be recognized as a core driver of growth. “We have not yet fully leveraged our innovation potential,” he stated, advocating for stronger industry-academia linkages and catalytic public procurement to stimulate demand for indigenous technologies.

The paradox of India’s manufacturing sector reflects this contradiction. Entrepreneurs across industrial clusters in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka exhibit resilience and adaptability, yet many remain ensnared in low-value manufacturing. Innovation expert Yogesh Pandit describes this as a “low-value trap,” where firms compete on cost rather than capability—not due to a lack of ambition, but because of insufficient structured pathways to adopt or co-develop new technologies.

Historically, India has been a civilization of creators, from the Sindhu-Saraswati era to the Chola Empire, where Indian technologies and goods significantly influenced global trade. The contemporary challenge is not about rediscovering talent but about rebuilding systems that enable that talent to thrive.

India’s next leap in innovation will not stem from isolated breakthroughs. It will emerge from aligning incentives across academia, industry, and government; funding the entire lifecycle of innovation; and rewarding product creation rather than merely academic publication.

Experts broadly agree on several necessary reforms: reforming academic incentives to reward patents, prototypes, and industry collaboration; strengthening industry-academia linkages through research parks and shared labs; bridging the valley of death with dedicated TRL 3–7 funding; increasing R&D spending to 2% of GDP; and fostering a product-first culture that celebrates long-term innovation and risk-taking.

In conclusion, India’s innovation narrative is not one of failure but of untapped potential. The ideas and talent are present; what is lacking is alignment. With deliberate reform and sustained commitment, India can transition from a nation rich in ideas to one that consistently produces world-changing products, according to Global Net News.

Coping Strategies for Individuals Facing Gambling Disorders

Rohini, a first-generation Indian immigrant, seeks help as her husband Raghav struggles with a gambling disorder, highlighting the complexities of addiction and the importance of support and treatment.

Rohini, a 43-year-old first-generation Indian immigrant, moved to Las Vegas with her husband Raghav and their son Rahul five years ago. Raghav, an IT professional, has recently developed a troubling relationship with gambling, which has raised concerns for Rohini.

Over the past year, Raghav has increasingly spent time and money at local casinos. Although he has experienced occasional wins, they have been overshadowed by significant losses. He often reassures Rohini that he will win big next time, but his preoccupation with gambling has led him to make excuses for absences from work and to lie to her. Worried about the impact of Raghav’s behavior on their family, Rohini sought advice.

Dr. Sharma, a mental health expert, diagnosed Raghav with signs of compulsive gambling, also known as gambling disorder. This condition is characterized by a persistent urge to gamble despite negative consequences, such as financial loss and strained relationships. According to Dr. Sharma, approximately 0.5% of the adult population in the United States suffers from this disorder, which is classified as a behavioral addiction that can lead to severe impairment in various aspects of life.

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR) has redefined pathological gambling as “gambling disorder,” placing it within the Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders chapter. This change underscores the similarities between gambling addiction and substance abuse disorders.

When asked about the causes of this addiction, Dr. Sharma explained that gambling disorder arises from a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Stress, depression, domestic violence, substance use, financial instability, and impulsivity can all contribute to the development of this disorder. In Raghav’s case, living in Las Vegas, a city known for its casinos, may have exacerbated his gambling behavior. Additionally, studies have indicated a rise in online gambling disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic.

For treatment, Dr. Sharma recommended that Raghav reach out to a mental healthcare provider. He highlighted the National Problem Gambling Helpline (1-800-522-4700) as a confidential resource for support. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one effective approach, as it helps individuals identify and change unhealthy thought patterns and behaviors. Motivational interviewing (MI) can also be beneficial, fostering commitment and confidence in the recovery process.

Family therapy may be another avenue for Rohini and Raghav, as it can improve their relationship and communication. In some cases, a psychiatrist might prescribe medications to address coexisting mental health issues. Support groups, such as Gamblers Anonymous, which follows a 12-step program, can serve as valuable adjuncts to recovery. For severe cases, residential treatment options in structured environments may be necessary.

Dr. Sharma outlined several signs of recovery from gambling addiction. Research indicates that recovery often involves improved insight, empowerment, enhanced well-being, and reduced risk of relapse. Observable behavioral signs include a decrease in gambling frequency, better impulse control, and avoidance of high-risk situations. Emotionally, individuals may experience less preoccupation with gambling, improved mood, and increased self-awareness. Socially, recovery can lead to stronger relationships, greater financial stability, and enhanced coping strategies.

Preventing relapse is crucial, according to Dr. Sharma. He advised Rohini to remain vigilant about both internal and external triggers that may lead Raghav back to gambling. Keeping a journal to track his thoughts and feelings can be helpful. Raghav should also develop healthy coping mechanisms, such as engaging in hobbies, exercising, or pursuing creative activities. Building a supportive social network is essential, as is maintaining transparency about finances and establishing clear boundaries.

Removing access to gambling opportunities and having a relapse action plan in place are also critical steps in the recovery journey. Dr. Sharma emphasized that practices like yoga and meditation can support recovery by reducing stress and anxiety, improving emotional regulation, and fostering mindfulness.

For those seeking additional resources, Dr. Sharma recommended several websites, including the Cleveland Clinic’s information on gambling disorder, the Victoria State Government’s guide on regaining control over gambling, and the Mayo Clinic’s resources on compulsive gambling. Treatment recommendations can also be found on Mass.gov.

For further questions, individuals can reach out to Dr. Manoj Sharma at editor@indiacurrents.com.

This situation illustrates the complexities of gambling addiction and the importance of seeking help. With the right support and treatment, recovery is possible.

Hamas Confirms Deaths of Five Leaders, Including Key Spokesperson

Hamas has confirmed the deaths of five senior leaders, including its masked spokesperson, marking a significant setback for the militant organization amid ongoing conflict in Gaza.

Hamas has officially acknowledged the deaths of five senior leaders, representing one of the most substantial blows to the militant group since the onset of the Gaza war. The announcement was made by the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’s armed wing, in a statement released on Monday.

Among those confirmed dead is Mohammed al-Sinwar, the brother of former Hamas leader Yahya al-Sinwar. He was reportedly killed during Israeli military operations in Gaza. The Jerusalem Post noted that al-Sinwar had ascended to a prominent role within the organization and was considered a key figure in Hamas’s wartime command following the deaths of other top commanders. The Israeli military had previously stated in May that he was killed in an airstrike targeting a Hamas command center located beneath the European Hospital in Khan Younis.

While Hamas did not specify the exact date of al-Sinwar’s death, it did confirm that he had been killed earlier this year. The group also acknowledged the death of Abu Obeida, the long-time masked spokesman for the al-Qassam Brigades, who had become the public face of the group’s military wing during the ongoing conflict. According to Reuters, this announcement marked the first time Hamas revealed Abu Obeida’s real name: Hudhayfa Samir Abdullah al-Kahlout. Israeli statements indicated that he was killed in an Israeli strike on Gaza City in late August, and while Israel had previously announced his death, this was the first official confirmation from Hamas.

In addition to al-Sinwar and Abu Obeida, Hamas confirmed the deaths of Raed Saad, a high-ranking commander within the al-Qassam Brigades, and Mohammed Shabanah, the head of its Rafah Brigade. Saad was reported killed in a targeted strike after months of tracking his movements through Gaza’s tunnel network. Israeli security officials described him as one of the principal planners behind the October 7, 2023, attack, which resulted in approximately 1,200 fatalities and over 250 hostages taken. Hakam al-Issa, a veteran commander and one of the founders of the al-Qassam Brigades, was also confirmed dead; he was reported killed during airstrikes in Gaza earlier this year, specifically in the Sabra neighborhood of Gaza City.

The confirmations of these deaths come despite a ceasefire that took effect in October. Following a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, President Trump issued a warning regarding Hamas. He stated that the group must disarm soon or face severe consequences. “They’re going to be given a very short period of time to disarm,” Trump said, adding that the next phase of the Gaza peace plan could proceed swiftly if Hamas lays down its weapons.

This development underscores the ongoing volatility in the region and the significant challenges facing Hamas as it navigates the aftermath of these leadership losses.

According to The Jerusalem Post, the ramifications of these deaths could further destabilize Hamas’s command structure and influence in the ongoing conflict.

Andrew Branca Show Faces Backlash for Remarks on Indian-American Vivek Ramaswamy

Andrew Branca, host of “The Andrew Branca Show,” faces backlash for racially charged comments directed at Vivek Ramaswamy during a recent online tirade.

Racism appears to have reached new lows with Andrew Branca, the host of “The Andrew Branca Show,” as he recently launched a racially charged tirade against Vivek Ramaswamy.

Branca shared a video on Elon Musk’s platform, X, in which he criticized Ramaswamy for sitting barefoot during an interview. Accompanying the video, Branca made a series of derogatory remarks, questioning Ramaswamy’s cultural identity.

“How do you know that cultural Indian Vivek Ramaswamy is indeed CULTURALLY INDIAN? Because he DOES SHIT LIKE this BAREFOOT interview on camera,” Branca stated. He further claimed, “No cultural American would dress in business attire for a filmed interview, and then TAKE OFF HIS SHOES AND SOCKS TO BE BAREFOOT. These cultural Indians JUST CANNOT HELP THEMSELVES from behaving consistent with their INDIAN CULTURE.”

In his commentary, Branca also made insinuations about the size and shape of Ramaswamy’s feet, attempting to cast doubt on their normalcy.

Hosted by attorney Andrew Branca, “The Andrew Branca Show” focuses on political commentary and legal analysis. The program often emphasizes constitutional issues, contemporary political developments, and legal controversies, reflecting Branca’s stated values of supporting the U.S. Constitution, Western civilization, meritocracy, and family principles.

The show is closely associated with Branca’s broader Law of Self Defense community, where he utilizes his experience as a practicing attorney and legal instructor to explain complex legal and constitutional matters to a general audience.

Vivek Ramaswamy, an American entrepreneur, author, and political figure, is recognized for his contributions to biotechnology and his public commentary on corporate and political issues. Born in 1985 in Cincinnati, Ohio, Ramaswamy studied biology at Harvard University and later earned a law degree from Yale Law School. He gained prominence as the founder of Roivant Sciences, a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to accelerating drug development through innovative corporate structures.

In addition to his business ventures, Ramaswamy has authored several books that explore themes such as corporate culture, stakeholder capitalism, and the intersection of business and politics. He advocates for principles including free markets, individual liberty, and merit-based achievement.

Incidents like Branca’s comments can be amplified on social media, transforming a private or seemingly innocuous action into a viral topic of debate.

The backlash against Branca’s remarks highlights the ongoing discussions surrounding race, culture, and identity in contemporary society, particularly in the context of public figures and their actions.

As the conversation continues, many are left questioning the implications of such remarks and the broader societal attitudes they reflect.

According to The American Bazaar, the incident has sparked significant outrage and calls for accountability in media discourse.

Trump and Susie Wild Host Engaging Show for Indian-American Audience

In a revealing Vanity Fair interview, Susie Wiles, Donald Trump’s chief of staff, discusses her boss’s personality, the dynamics within the White House, and the challenges facing the administration.

Susie Wiles, known as the “Ice Maiden” by Donald Trump, has been a steady force in the White House, contrasting sharply with the chaos of Trump’s first term. In a recent Vanity Fair interview, the 68-year-old political operative shared insights about her boss and the unique personalities that make up his administration.

Wiles compared Trump to her late father, legendary sportscaster Pat Summerall, suggesting that he possesses “an alcoholic’s personality.” She described this trait as a mindset where Trump believes there is “nothing he can’t do. Nothing, zero, nothing.” This characterization raises questions about the psychological underpinnings of Trump’s leadership style.

In her candid remarks, Wiles labeled Vice President JD Vance a “conspiracy theorist” and described White House budget director Russell Vought as “a right-wing absolute zealot.” She also referred to Elon Musk, a former ally of Trump, as “an odd, odd duck,” acknowledging Musk’s reputation as a genius and his reported use of ketamine.

Wiles revealed that significant disagreements have arisen within the administration, particularly regarding the implementation of tariffs. She admitted that the administration needs to “look harder” at its mass deportation processes and that she had to align herself with Trump’s decision to extend blanket pardons to those involved in the January 6 Capitol riots.

Despite her attempts to establish a “loose agreement” with Trump to end political retribution after 90 days, Wiles ultimately conceded that Trump often has his way. “In some cases, it may look like retribution,” she acknowledged, adding, “And there may be an element of that from time to time. Who would blame him? Not me.”

Wiles also touched on Trump’s controversial relationship with the late Jeffrey Epstein, criticizing Attorney General Pam Bondi for failing to recognize the fervor of Trump’s right-wing supporters regarding Epstein’s files. Just days after the interview, the Justice Department released hundreds of thousands of pages of documents related to Epstein, but many were heavily redacted, raising concerns about transparency.

Despite Trump’s well-documented friendship with Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s, his name was rarely mentioned in the released documents, while former President Bill Clinton was prominently featured.

The late-night talk show circuit had a field day with Wiles’ interview. Jimmy Kimmel humorously referred to her as “the future former chief of staff,” prompting speculation about whether Trump and Wiles were engaging in a good cop-bad cop routine.

Wiles dismissed the Vanity Fair article as “a disingenuously framed hit piece” on both herself and the Trump administration, yet she did not dispute any of the facts or quotes presented. Trump came to her defense, calling her “fantastic.”

In a surprising turn, Trump delivered a succinct sales pitch on television the night following Wiles’ interview, highlighting the accomplishments of his first term and the challenges ahead. He blamed his predecessor, Joe Biden, for various issues, claiming, “Good evening, America. Eleven months ago, I inherited a mess, and I’m fixing it.” He went on to assert that the U.S. is “poised for an economic boom the likes of which the world has never seen.”

Wiles played a key role in encouraging Trump to deliver this rare prime-time address. According to a television pool report, she reminded him of the time constraint, saying, “I told you 20 minutes,” to which Trump responded by sticking to the schedule.

In a move that reflects his penchant for branding, Trump renamed the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to the Trump-Kennedy Center, following a vote by his hand-picked board of trustees. This change, however, may require congressional approval.

Additionally, new plaques were installed under presidential portraits on Trump’s “Presidential Walk of Fame” in the White House colonnade. Many of these plaques, reportedly written by Trump himself, present a distorted version of history. For example, the plaque under the portrait of “Sleepy Joe Biden” labels him “the worst President in American History,” while the one under “Barack Hussein Obama” calls him “one of the most divisive figures in American history.”

As for the funding of these plaques and whether government resources were used for their installation, the White House has not provided any information.

In response to Trump’s actions, California Governor Gavin Newsom took to social media to mockingly post his own version of a Trump plaque, stating, “DONALD IS FINISHED – HE IS NO LONGER ‘HOT’… DONNIE J MISSED ‘THE DEADLINE’ (WHOOPS!) AND NOW I RUN THE SHOW.”

Meanwhile, a social media account humorously dubbed ‘DiaperDiplomacy’ shared an AI-generated, childlike version of Trump’s speech, depicting him boasting about various policies while poking fun at his leadership style.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, Wiles’ revelations and Trump’s ongoing branding efforts highlight the complexities and controversies surrounding this administration.

According to Vanity Fair, the dynamics within the White House remain as unpredictable as ever.

US Affirms India’s Role as Key Partner Despite Pax Silica Absence

The United States reaffirmed India’s importance as a strategic partner in supply chain security and advanced technologies, despite India’s absence from the inaugural Pax Silica Summit.

WASHINGTON, DC – The United States has emphasized that India continues to be a vital strategic partner in the areas of supply chain security and advanced technologies, even though New Delhi did not participate in the inaugural Pax Silica Summit. This new U.S.-led initiative aims to secure the global silicon and semiconductor supply chain.

During a recent news conference organized by the Foreign Press Centre, Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs Jacob Helberg addressed speculation surrounding India’s absence from the summit. He stated that the conjecture linking India’s non-participation to political tensions with Washington was misplaced and incorrect.

Helberg clarified, “My understanding is that there was a lot of speculation behind India not participating in the Pax Silica Summit. I want to be clear that the conversations between the United States and India pertaining to trade arrangements are a completely separate and parallel track to our discussions on supply chain security. We are not conflating those two things.”

He further highlighted that the U.S. views India as a highly strategic potential partner in efforts related to supply chain security and expressed a desire to engage with India on these matters.

The Pax Silica initiative, launched last week, includes an initial group of countries that are closely linked to semiconductor manufacturing and advanced technology supply chains. This group comprises Singapore, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the United Kingdom. The framework aims to reduce vulnerabilities in global supply chains that support various industries, including smartphones, automobiles, and artificial intelligence.

On the subject of India, Helberg underscored that engagement with New Delhi is ongoing and active. He noted that he is in nearly daily communication with officials in Delhi and mentioned that Washington is actively exploring ways to deepen collaboration swiftly.

Helberg also pointed to an upcoming opportunity for high-level engagement, revealing that he will attend the ‘India AI Impact Summit’ in February. He indicated that the U.S. plans to significantly enhance bilateral collaboration with India on economic security issues and suggested that Indian participation in future Pax Silica-related efforts remains a distinct possibility.

Earlier in the briefing, Helberg explained that the initial group of Pax Silica countries was intentionally limited to those forming the core of semiconductor manufacturing, such as Singapore, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and the Netherlands, before potentially expanding to include areas like critical minerals.

This ongoing dialogue reflects the United States’ commitment to strengthening its partnership with India, particularly in the context of global supply chain security and technological advancements, as both nations navigate the complexities of international trade and economic cooperation.

According to IANS, the U.S. remains optimistic about India’s future involvement in initiatives like Pax Silica, reinforcing the notion that collaboration between the two countries is both necessary and beneficial.

India Introduces Nuclear Bill with Operator Protections and Privatization Changes

India’s government has introduced the SHANTI Bill, aiming to privatize the nuclear sector and enhance safety regulations while targeting 100 gigawatts of nuclear power capacity by 2047.

NEW DELHI – On December 16, Union Minister of State for Science and Technology Jitendra Singh presented the ‘Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India’ (SHANTI) Bill, 2025, in Parliament. This significant legislation aims to open the nuclear industry to private players, with a goal of achieving 100 gigawatts (GW) of nuclear power capacity by 2047.

The proposed bill seeks to repeal the existing ‘Atomic Energy Act of 1962’ and the ‘Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act of 2010.’ By doing so, it aims to facilitate private sector participation while restructuring the legal framework surrounding accident compensation.

One of the key features of the SHANTI Bill is the introduction of provisions that effectively exempt nuclear reactor suppliers from liability concerning faulty equipment. Additionally, it shields operators from certain tort claims made by victims of nuclear accidents. This aspect of the bill addresses long-standing demands from the international nuclear industry, particularly from U.S. firms, which have advocated for protections against compensation claims in the event of an accident.

According to the statement of objects and reasons accompanying the bill, India has made significant strides in achieving self-reliance across the nuclear fuel cycle. The government asserts that its experience in managing the nuclear power program responsibly positions it to enhance nuclear installed capacity. This expansion is intended to support clean energy security and provide reliable, round-the-clock power for emerging needs, such as data centers and future-ready applications.

The SHANTI Bill also proposes a revised civil liability framework for nuclear damage, confers statutory status on the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, and strengthens mechanisms related to safety, security, safeguards, quality assurance, and emergency preparedness. Furthermore, it outlines the creation of new institutional arrangements, including an Atomic Energy Redressal Advisory Council, the designation of Claims Commissioners, and a Nuclear Damage Claims Commission to address cases involving severe nuclear damage.

This legislative initiative marks a pivotal moment in India’s approach to nuclear energy, reflecting a commitment to modernize the sector while addressing the concerns of private investors and enhancing safety protocols.

According to IANS, the introduction of the SHANTI Bill signals a transformative shift in India’s nuclear policy, aiming to balance the need for increased energy capacity with robust safety measures.

From Babysitter to Business Owner: An Indian-American’s Journey of Resilience

Muna’s journey from a struggling babysitter to a successful business owner highlights the resilience of immigrants and the vital role they play in American society.

Muna is among the many Somalis who have found refuge in the United States through Temporary Protected Status (TPS) since the onset of civil war in Somalia in 1991. This conflict has claimed the lives of as many as 1 million people, forcing countless others to flee their homeland, often ending up in refugee camps for years.

Arriving in San Diego in 1999 with her 6-month-old baby and no connections, Muna began her American journey by knocking on doors, seeking families in need of a babysitter. Over the next four years, she worked in 20 different households as a nanny and housekeeper, sometimes even sleeping on the floor. Despite the hardships, Muna persevered, and in 2018, she took the bold step of starting her own childcare business, which has since flourished.

“It’s a lot of kids to run,” she said with a laugh. “But it’s worth it.”

Muna’s story is a testament to the resilience and determination often found among immigrants, particularly women who frequently assume caregiving roles in American families. “Everything is hard,” she reflected. “Nothing is easy to become an American and get your papers.”

In her early years in the U.S., Muna faced numerous challenges. She began her work at a starting wage of $6.45 per hour, often enduring difficult living conditions. “When people see you don’t have nothing, they can do anything,” she recalled. The struggles intensified when her daughter faced bullying from boys in the households where they lived.

“I didn’t mind—but when they started hitting my daughter, it was too much,” Muna said, emphasizing the emotional toll of her situation.

Despite these challenges, Muna managed to carve out some time for herself, working at a nearby store. Her determination allowed her to save enough money to rent an apartment, transitioning to a full-time retail position where she eventually became a store manager. Along the way, she met and married a U.S. citizen, welcomed a second daughter, and became a naturalized citizen in 2023.

When Muna decided to start her own business, she chose childcare, opening a small daycare center in her home that is licensed to care for eight children at a time. Her afternoon slots are consistently full, and she often has to turn families away. Muna is now saving to purchase a larger home to accommodate more children, with her daughter assisting her in the business.

As the owner-operator of her daycare, Muna’s responsibilities include caring for infants, transporting children to and from school, taking them to the park and library, and assisting with homework. In addition to her business, she serves on the board of Global Village, a housing project currently under development, and volunteers with the Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans, where she supports newly arrived refugees.

For the first time since moving to the United States, Muna enjoys weekends off. “In the seven years, I know what the Saturday-Sunday thing is,” she said, laughing. “It’s so nice, so nice.”

Muna’s journey reflects not only her personal resilience but also the broader narrative of immigrant contributions to American society. Her story serves as an inspiration to many, illustrating the transformative power of determination and hard work.

According to American Immigration Council, Muna’s experience underscores the vital role that immigrant women play in the caregiving landscape of the United States.

Why the U.S. Excluded India from the Pax Silica Framework

The United States has excluded India from its newly launched Pax Silica initiative, raising concerns about geopolitical and economic implications for both nations.

Escalating tensions between the United States and India have surfaced once again, as the U.S. has notably excluded India from its new strategic initiative, Pax Silica. This initiative aims to create a secure and innovative silicon supply chain, encompassing critical minerals, energy inputs, advanced manufacturing, semiconductors, artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure, and logistics.

Pax Silica was formally announced during a summit in Washington, D.C., where representatives from various participating countries signed the Pax Silica Declaration. This declaration affirms their commitment to cooperate on supply chains that are essential for AI, semiconductors, advanced manufacturing, and related infrastructure.

The initiative includes major players such as Japan, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and Australia. Additionally, guest contributions were made by Taiwan, the European Union, Canada, and the OECD. However, India was notably absent from this coalition.

At the inaugural summit, representatives discussed collaborative efforts to strengthen supply chains that span critical minerals, energy inputs, semiconductor production, data centers, and logistics networks. The primary goal of Pax Silica is to reduce dependencies on concentrated sources of critical materials and technology, particularly in light of China’s dominant position in rare earths and chip manufacturing.

By promoting cooperation among allied nations, Pax Silica aims to coordinate research and development, manufacturing, infrastructure investment, and joint ventures in strategic sectors that are vital for AI and future technologies. The initiative also emphasizes the importance of building a trusted and secure technology ecosystem, safeguarding sensitive technologies and infrastructure, and enhancing economic security in a world increasingly driven by AI and advanced computing.

The launch of Pax Silica underscores the growing significance of securing supply chains and technological infrastructure in an era characterized by rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and semiconductor-driven innovation. By uniting leading technology and industrial nations, the initiative reflects a collective effort to reduce reliance on concentrated sources of critical materials, improve resilience, and foster stability across sectors crucial for economic and technological development.

However, the exclusion of certain countries, including India, highlights how strategic, economic, and geopolitical considerations influence participation in global technology partnerships. This exclusion could indicate potential diplomatic or trade tensions, prompting countries outside the initiative to explore alternative strategies for securing resources and maintaining competitiveness in key industries.

India’s exclusion from Pax Silica may limit the initiative’s access to one of the world’s largest and fastest-growing technology markets. The country boasts a significant portion of the global software services industry, a rapidly expanding semiconductor ecosystem, and a large pool of skilled engineers and technology professionals. By not including India, Pax Silica risks missing opportunities to leverage India’s human capital, innovation capabilities, and emerging technology startups, which could enhance research and development efforts, AI deployment, and semiconductor innovation within the coalition.

Moreover, India possesses substantial reserves of certain critical minerals and has burgeoning capabilities in manufacturing and renewable energy, both of which are essential for constructing resilient supply chains. The exclusion from the initiative could hinder collaborative efforts to diversify sourcing of raw materials, mitigate supply chain risks, and establish a broader, more geographically balanced network.

Furthermore, this exclusion may limit Pax Silica’s influence in shaping global standards, technology governance, and trade norms in sectors where India is emerging as a significant player. In the long term, these gaps could diminish the overall effectiveness and reach of Pax Silica’s strategic objectives.

As the global landscape continues to evolve, the implications of India’s exclusion from the Pax Silica initiative will likely resonate across various sectors and influence future diplomatic relations between the United States and India, as well as their respective roles in the global technology ecosystem.

According to The American Bazaar, the ongoing developments surrounding Pax Silica will be closely monitored as countries reassess their strategic partnerships and technological collaborations in response to shifting geopolitical dynamics.

Nutrient Deficiency May Increase Heart Disease Risk for Millions

Global omega-3 deficiency affects 76% of people worldwide, significantly increasing risks for heart disease, cognitive decline, and chronic inflammation, according to a new study.

A recent analysis has revealed that more than three-quarters of the global population is not meeting the recommended intake levels of omega-3 fatty acids, a nutrient gap that could lead to increased risks of heart disease, cognitive decline, chronic inflammation, and vision problems. This finding comes from a study published in *Nutrition Research Reviews*, conducted by researchers from the University of East Anglia, the University of Southampton, and Holland & Barrett.

The review indicates that 76% of individuals worldwide are falling short of the recommended daily intake of two essential omega-3 fats: eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Global health authorities recommend that most adults aim for at least 250 milligrams of EPA and DHA per day, yet actual intake levels are significantly lower in many regions.

To delve deeper into the health implications of low omega-3 intake, Fox News Digital consulted with Michelle Routhenstein, a preventive cardiology dietitian based in New York at Entirely Nourished. Routhenstein confirmed that low omega-3 levels can adversely affect heart health, cognitive function, and inflammation throughout the body.

According to Routhenstein, insufficient omega-3 intake can elevate the risk of heart attacks and sudden cardiac death. It is also associated with higher triglyceride levels, irregular heart rhythms, and plaque buildup in the arteries. Furthermore, inadequate omega-3 levels have been linked to cognitive decline, a heightened risk of Alzheimer’s disease, and increased rates of depression.

Routhenstein pointed out that low omega-3 levels may exacerbate inflammation in autoimmune conditions, such as psoriasis, and can negatively impact eye health, as omega-3s play a crucial structural role in the retina.

To improve omega-3 levels, Routhenstein emphasized the importance of understanding both the required intake and the best sources of these essential fats. She noted that the richest dietary sources of EPA and DHA are oily fish, including salmon, mackerel, sardines, herring, trout, and anchovies. For many individuals, consuming oily fish three to four times per week can be beneficial.

For those who do not regularly eat fish, omega-3 supplements can help raise EPA and DHA levels to healthier ranges. Routhenstein advised that dosing for omega-3 supplements should be tailored based on lab results, medications, omega-3 levels, and overall medical history. Generally, moderate, quality-controlled supplements are considered safe for most individuals.

There is also evidence supporting the use of prescription-strength omega-3 products. Routhenstein noted that high-dose EPA, such as 4 grams per day of icosapent ethyl, has been shown to reduce major cardiovascular events in certain high-risk populations. However, similar doses of mixed EPA/DHA have not consistently demonstrated the same benefits.

Testing omega-3 levels can provide insight into whether an individual’s intake is adequate. The omega-3 index, a blood test that measures EPA and DHA in red blood cells, is regarded as one of the most reliable methods for assessing omega-3 status. Routhenstein explained that levels around 8% are associated with a lower cardiovascular risk, while levels below approximately 4% are considered low.

Understanding one’s baseline omega-3 levels can help guide more personalized dietary and supplementation decisions. Individuals who are uncertain about their omega-3 status or whether supplementation is appropriate are encouraged to consult with a healthcare provider to determine the best course of action.

According to Routhenstein, addressing omega-3 deficiency could play a significant role in improving overall health and reducing the risk of serious health issues.

India’s Cultural Shift: From ‘Anything Goes’ to ‘Yes Means Yes’

In a follow-up to his previous column, Vinson Xavier Palathingal discusses the importance of assimilation for Indians living in the West, advocating for a cultural shift towards integrity and accountability.

Assimilation is not about abandoning one’s roots; it is about understanding the values of the society we choose to live in and adapting with honesty and humility. In my last column, “India vs. West: Why ‘Yes Means Yes’ Beats ‘Sub Kuch Chalta Hai’ (‘Anything Goes’) in a Rules-Driven World,” published on December 11, 2025, I argued that while talent and intelligence have taken Indians far, true respect abroad will come only when integrity, punctuality, and reliability define the Indian global identity.

The response to that piece has been intense, particularly from fellow Indians and many within the Hindu community. Such reactions were not unexpected. When long-held cultural assumptions are examined at their roots, discomfort is inevitable. This follow-up is not intended to argue with critics or trade accusations but to clarify intent, correct misunderstandings, and deepen the discussion around the root causes I believe we must honestly confront.

This discourse is not meant to frame India and the West as competitors. Rather, it seeks to understand why two civilizations evolved differently and what responsibilities naturally fall on those who leave one system and choose to live within another.

Assimilation is the responsibility of minorities everywhere. Let me begin with absolute clarity: I am not finding fault with India, Hinduism, or Indian culture as a whole. Instead, I am pointing out the foundational logic behind two different civilizational systems and explaining why friction arises when people transition from one to the other.

Migration flows overwhelmingly from India to the West, not the other way around. This simple fact matters. Wherever people migrate and become a minority, they must recalibrate their beliefs and behaviors to assimilate into the host society. This principle applies universally, including within India itself. Indians instinctively understand this when minorities attempt to alter India’s cultural or social norms. The same logic applies in reverse.

If Indians choose to live in Western societies and benefit from their freedoms, institutions, and protections, then adaptation should not be viewed as submission; it is a sign of maturity. This is not asking too much of Indians; it is asking what every civilization expects of newcomers.

We must confront an uncomfortable but necessary observation: the deep injustices embedded in the Indian caste system were never meaningfully corrected from within Hindu society over centuries. Real reform required external influence—Western legal frameworks, Christian missionary education, British administrative intervention, and later constitutional enforcement. In contrast, the West’s gravest moral failures, such as slavery and segregation, were confronted and corrected largely from within. Abolitionists quoted the Bible, and civil rights leaders appealed to moral absolutes already embedded in Western thought. The system possessed the philosophical tools needed for its own correction.

This is not an insult; it is an observation. Today, many Indians celebrate economic success in the West without acknowledging the moral and institutional foundations that made such success possible. As someone trained in root cause analysis, I am not interested in celebrating outcomes while ignoring inputs. My focus is on fixing causes, not defending pride or manufacturing excuses.

Another factor that must be acknowledged is the impact of post-independence socialism in India. The country chose decades of centralized control, government ownership, and diluted personal responsibility. When everything belongs to the government, nothing truly belongs to the citizen. When no one owns the system personally, abusing it feels morally neutral.

This mindset is captured perfectly in two Malayalam adages many of us grew up hearing. The first suggests that resources exist to be exploited rather than respected, reflecting a worldview where bending rules is seen as cleverness rather than dishonesty. This mindset does not translate well into societies where ownership, accountability, and consequences are personal and immediate.

Western systems are generally simpler, more direct, and easier to implement. This simplicity is precisely why progress becomes visible faster. In contrast, Indian systems are ancient, layered, and deeply nuanced. They are broad and deep but also complex and slow to adapt. There is no shame in this difference.

However, the direction of movement matters. Indians migrate to the West in search of opportunity, not the other way around. Those who arrive cannot expect to reshape local norms without resistance. Any society would view such attempts as invasive. Indians understand this instinctively when the discussion is about India, and the same principle applies abroad.

This discussion is not about cultural superiority; there is no scoreboard. We are immigrants. Assimilation is not weakness; it is the strongest investment we can make in our children’s future. Recognizing this reality is not bootlicking, as some have accused me of; it is realism.

I call America my home because it is my children’s home. Wanting harmony, safety, and dignity for them requires honest self-correction, not defensive outrage. The West’s strength lies in its ability to correct course simply and without drama. That trait is worth learning, not mocking.

To clarify, I never said anything negative about India or Indian culture. I spoke directly and exclusively to Indians who have immigrated to the West, urging them to recalibrate their beliefs around rules, fairness, punctuality, and integrity. Nothing more.

Name-calling does not solve root causes. Emotional reactions do not fix systemic friction. Honest self-assessment does. My goal remains unchanged from the previous column: to protect Indians abroad, reduce resentment before it hardens into hostility, and encourage assimilation so our children inherit opportunity rather than suspicion. That requires courage and, above all, honesty.

According to The American Bazaar, this ongoing dialogue is essential for fostering understanding and respect between cultures.

Piyush Goyal Indicates No Deadline for US Tariff Agreement

Union Minister Piyush Goyal announced that trade talks between India and the U.S. are progressing well, but emphasized there is no deadline for finalizing a tariff deal.

MUMBAI – On December 11, Union Minister Piyush Goyal stated that the ongoing trade discussions between Indian and U.S. officials are advancing positively. However, he made it clear that there is no set deadline for reaching an agreement.

During a briefing about U.S. Deputy Trade Representative Rick Switzer’s recent two-day visit to New Delhi, Goyal remarked, “We had very good substantive discussions. But I have said on record that a deal is only done when both sides stand to benefit. We should never negotiate with deadlines because you tend to make mistakes then.”

Goyal elaborated on the nature of the current discussions, noting, “Negotiations are progressing well. We’ve had substantive discussions over several rounds of negotiations. In the past, I think five rounds have happened. The current visit is not a negotiating round. The current visit is being undertaken by a new Deputy United States Trade Representative (USTR) who has joined about three months ago. It’s his first visit to India. We’re getting to know each other.”

On December 10, India’s Commerce Secretary Rajesh Agrawal and U.S. Deputy Trade Representative Switzer engaged in discussions regarding the proposed bilateral trade agreement between the two nations.

As the talks continue, both sides appear committed to fostering a mutually beneficial relationship, with Goyal emphasizing the importance of thorough negotiations over rushed agreements.

This ongoing dialogue reflects the broader context of U.S.-India trade relations, which have seen fluctuations and challenges in recent years. The absence of a deadline suggests a cautious approach, prioritizing the quality of the agreement over speed.

According to IANS, the discussions are part of a larger effort to enhance trade ties between the two countries, which have been working towards a comprehensive trade agreement that addresses various sectors and concerns.

Trump’s Gold Card: A Million-Dollar Ticket to the American Dream

President Trump has introduced a new immigration pathway, the Gold Card, which allows wealthy individuals to fast-track their residency in the U.S. for a $1 million investment.

In a bold move aimed at reshaping the immigration landscape, President Trump has unveiled the Gold Card, a new pay-to-immigrate pathway that promises legal status and a potential route to citizenship for those willing to invest $1 million. This announcement comes at a time when many qualified visa applicants feel that their dreams of American residency are increasingly out of reach.

On Wednesday, Trump introduced the Gold Card during a White House roundtable, launching a dedicated website, trumpcard.gov, where prospective applicants can begin the process. The program requires individuals to pay a non-refundable application fee of $15,000 to the federal government, in addition to the $1 million investment. Corporations seeking to sponsor foreign employees will need to invest $2 million per employee.

The Gold Card is intended to replace the existing EB-5 investor visa program, which has been in place since 1990. Under the EB-5 rules, applicants must invest approximately $1 million and create at least ten American jobs. In contrast, the Gold Card offers a more streamlined approach, though it remains to be seen how it will coexist with the EB-5 program.

Trump has positioned the Gold Card as a means to generate revenue for the federal treasury while attracting top talent from around the globe. He described the Gold Card as “basically, it’s a green card but much better,” emphasizing that it provides a “much stronger path” to residency.

Victor A. Espinosa, Vice President of Global Business Development at the Peachtree Group, a real estate investment firm based in San Francisco, noted that the Gold Card has sparked significant interest among investors. “As global families evaluate U.S. immigration strategies, the proposed Trump Gold Card has naturally sparked conversation among many of the EB-5 investors I advise,” he said. “While it is still only a proposal—not a formal policy—the curiosity around how it might coexist with EB-5 is understandable. It has created a new layer of complexity.”

As of now, critical details regarding the Gold Card, such as job generation requirements, corporate criteria, and potential annual caps, have yet to be disclosed. The official website states, “For a $15,000 DHS processing fee and, after background approval, a contribution of $1 million, receive U.S. residency in record time with the Trump Gold Card.” It also mentions that the application process will take “weeks” and will include an interview, with additional fees to the State Department possibly applying based on the applicant’s circumstances.

Espinosa advises investors to carefully consider their options. “My role is to help clients evaluate every potential option. If the Gold Card were ever enacted, it would likely serve as a complementary pathway, not a replacement. Investors may ultimately choose a dual-track evaluation—assessing EB-5 for permanent residency while monitoring any developments around the proposed Gold Card for shorter-term or specialized benefits,” he explained.

The website also hints at an even more exclusive opportunity with the forthcoming Trump Platinum Card, which will allow foreign nationals to spend up to 270 days in the U.S. without being subject to U.S. taxes on non-U.S. income, provided they make a $5 million contribution along with the $15,000 processing fee.

As the landscape of U.S. immigration continues to evolve, the question remains: will the Gold Card pave a smoother path to the American dream for those with the financial means? Espinosa emphasizes the importance of informed decision-making. “The key is to make informed, strategic decisions. Advisors like me will commit to guiding investors through whichever route best aligns with their goals as more details emerge,” he concluded.

This new initiative reflects the ongoing debate over immigration policy in the United States, particularly regarding the balance between attracting foreign investment and ensuring equitable access to residency for all potential immigrants.

As the Gold Card proposal unfolds, it will be crucial for prospective investors to stay informed and evaluate their options carefully, particularly as more details about the program are released.

According to Victor A. Espinosa, the Gold Card could represent a significant shift in how wealthy individuals approach U.S. residency.

Marius CEO Calls for Overhaul of Testosterone Therapy Regulations at FDA Panel

At a recent FDA panel, Marius Pharmaceuticals CEO Shalin Shah and other experts advocated for a significant overhaul of testosterone therapy regulations to enhance treatment access and align with modern healthcare practices.

WASHINGTON, DC: Shalin Shah, CEO of Marius Pharmaceuticals, joined a panel of experts at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Wednesday to advocate for expanded access to testosterone therapy. This session was part of a series of discussions the FDA has initiated this year to gather insights from medical professionals regarding potential regulatory changes.

During the panel, FDA Commissioner Marty Marky expressed the agency’s commitment to understanding the complexities surrounding testosterone therapy without preconceived biases. Dr. Brian Christine, Assistant Secretary for Health at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), emphasized the importance of the panel, noting that discussions about men’s hormonal health have long been overlooked. He described the gathering as a pivotal moment in addressing these critical health issues.

Shah, alongside other notable panelists including Dr. Landon Trost, director of the Male Fertility and Peyronie’s Clinic in Orem, Utah; Dr. Helen Bernie, associate professor of urology at the Indiana University School of Medicine; and Dr. John Mulhall, urologic surgeon at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, called for a modernization of outdated medical and regulatory frameworks. Shah argued that these frameworks currently hinder millions of men from receiving necessary care for testosterone deficiency, a condition that can significantly impact overall health.

“The FDA, with its global leadership on healthcare standards, has the opportunity to drive a framework that can impact half a billion men and women globally who need testosterone and hormone therapy,” Shah stated.

The panel focused on Testosterone Replacement Therapy (TRT), a treatment designed for men whose bodies do not produce sufficient testosterone. The panelists strongly advocated for increasing access to TRT, highlighting the health issues associated with low testosterone levels, which can lead to decreased libido, fatigue, mood changes, and loss of muscle mass.

In 2015, the FDA mandated significant label changes for testosterone products, introducing warnings about potential risks of heart attack and stroke and restricting approved use to men with confirmed hypogonadism. Shah praised the FDA for reconsidering the scientific evidence surrounding testosterone deficiency, arguing that current regulations are based on outdated fears rather than medical facts.

“Testosterone deficiency is a disease amplifier,” Shah explained. “There is an androgen receptor on nearly every organ in our body, and our body should not be devoid of this critical hormone.” He pointed out that prior to the 2015 label changes, clinicians were able to treat testosterone deficiency without needing to meet stringent criteria, similar to how other medical conditions are managed.

Shah noted that recent advancements in testosterone therapy have brought renewed hope to millions of men experiencing low testosterone levels. Marius Pharmaceuticals, founded by Indian American entrepreneur Himanshu Shah, introduced Kyzatrex, an oral testosterone drug aimed at treating adult men with low or absent testosterone levels due to specific medical conditions.

Despite the potential benefits of TRT, Shah and other panelists highlighted that it has been underutilized due to lingering concerns linking it to prostate cancer, stroke, and heart disease. Shah framed testosterone therapy not as a means of enhancement but as a vital preventive tool against chronic diseases. He urged the FDA to expedite the approval process for broader indications that recognize testosterone deficiency as a critical component of managing comorbid metabolic diseases.

Shah also drew attention to the rise of GLP-1 medications, such as Ozempic and Wegovy, which are used for weight loss but can lead to rapid muscle loss. He warned that this trend underscores the urgent need for regulatory action regarding testosterone therapy.

“A massive case study is unfolding before our eyes,” Shah remarked, noting that nearly 20% of American adults have tried or are currently using GLP-1 drugs. “Shockingly, 40% of the weight loss that occurs is lean muscle.” He contrasted the billions spent by pharmaceutical companies on new, experimental treatments with the underutilization of existing hormonal therapies, calling for a decisive action from the FDA.

Shah criticized the structural failures within the healthcare system that create barriers to preventive care, including insurance limitations and regulatory inconsistencies. He shared that Marius launched Kyzatrex as a cash-only model to ensure direct access for patients, emphasizing that the traditional medical system often does not prioritize preventive care.

He proposed that the framework for testosterone therapy should begin with improved testing and coverage. Shah highlighted the challenges men face in obtaining testosterone level tests and advocated for mandatory screening, particularly for those with metabolic dysfunctions such as depression.

“The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force should implement mandatory coverage to support this framework,” he urged. He also called for equal coverage of all testosterone formulations, including oral therapies like Kyzatrex, by Medicare and commercial insurers.

Shah suggested that the Department of Health and Human Services consider testosterone therapy an essential health benefit, which would help reduce access barriers for millions of men. He noted that Marius Pharmaceuticals is committed to supporting government efforts to make testosterone therapy affordable.

In a pointed critique, Shah addressed the legal classification of testosterone, arguing that it is regulated more strictly than substances with higher abuse potential. He provided financial data from the Department of Veterans Affairs, which indicated that normalizing testosterone levels in hypogonadal men led to significant reductions in mortality and cardiovascular events.

“In the VA, normalization of testosterone in over 80,000 hypogonadal men was associated with a 56% lower all-cause mortality and meaningful reductions in heart attacks and strokes,” Shah stated. He emphasized that applying these results on a national scale could yield substantial savings for the healthcare system.

Shah concluded by asserting that addressing low testosterone is not merely a cosmetic issue but a significant preventive care opportunity. “This doesn’t count frailty, falls, dementia, productivity, and other benefits. For Medicare and our healthcare system, low testosterone is a multibillion-dollar preventive care opportunity,” he said.

According to The American Bazaar, Shah’s remarks at the FDA panel reflect a growing recognition of the importance of testosterone therapy in modern healthcare.

U.S. Supreme Court to Review Limits on Election Spending

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to reconsider longstanding limits on election spending, potentially reshaping the landscape of campaign finance in the wake of a Republican-led challenge.

Caps on election spending may soon become a relic of the past as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear a case that could overturn a quarter-century-old decision. This challenge, spearheaded by a Republican initiative and supported by the Trump administration, seeks to eliminate restrictions on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates for Congress and the presidency.

In 2001, the Supreme Court upheld a provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) that limited coordinated spending by political parties. In the case of Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee, the Court ruled that these limits were constitutional, arguing that unrestricted coordinated expenditures could bypass contribution limits and jeopardize the integrity of federal elections.

This ruling was grounded in the longstanding authority of Congress to regulate campaign finance, aiming to strike a balance between First Amendment rights and the need to prevent corruption or its appearance in federal elections.

As of 2025, the Supreme Court is revisiting this precedent in the case of National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission (NRSC v. FEC). The plaintiffs contend that the campaign finance landscape has undergone significant changes since 2001, rendering previous limits on coordinated spending overly restrictive of political speech and party activities.

They argue that subsequent rulings, particularly Citizens United v. FEC (2010), which expanded the ability of independent groups to spend on elections, have altered the dynamics of campaign finance. The Court has agreed to hear this case during the 2025–2026 term, indicating a potential reevaluation of the constitutional framework governing party-coordinated expenditures.

Following the Trump administration’s collaboration with Republicans to challenge the campaign finance law, the justices appointed a lawyer to defend the existing limits. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the future of campaign finance in the United States.

If the Court decides to strike down or substantially weaken the limits on coordinated spending, political parties may gain the ability to invest significantly more in support of their candidates. This shift could dramatically alter campaign strategies, fundraising efforts, and the overall dynamics of federal elections.

Conversely, if the Court upholds the limits, it would reaffirm Congress’s authority to regulate coordinated spending and maintain a clear distinction between independent and coordinated expenditures. However, the actual impact of any new ruling on campaign finance behavior remains uncertain, as both political strategies and legal interpretations continue to evolve.

Roman Martinez, a seasoned Supreme Court advocate, has proposed a potential resolution for the justices that would allow them to avoid making a definitive ruling. He suggests that the case should be deemed moot, given that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) now aligns with Republicans in asserting that the law is unconstitutional and that there is “no credible risk” of enforcement.

This case before the Supreme Court marks a critical juncture in the ongoing evolution of U.S. campaign finance law. At its heart, the dispute encapsulates a fundamental tension between two principles: the need to protect the integrity of federal elections by preventing corruption or its appearance, and the imperative to safeguard political speech, a core First Amendment right.

The 2001 precedent upheld limits on coordinated spending by political parties, emphasizing Congress’s role in regulating elections and maintaining clear boundaries between independent expenditures and party-directed spending. However, the plaintiffs in the current case argue that developments in campaign finance over the past two decades, particularly following landmark rulings like Citizens United, have rendered these limits outdated and unnecessarily restrictive.

The Supreme Court’s decision in this case could redefine the landscape of campaign finance, influencing how elections are funded and conducted in the years to come, according to The American Bazaar.

Leveraging Digital Public Infrastructure for Effective AI Governance

The Asia Society Policy Institute has outlined key insights from a roundtable in New Delhi, focusing on the role of Digital Public Infrastructure in AI governance ahead of the 2026 AI Impact Summit.

December 5, 2025 — New Delhi: The Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI) has released a comprehensive summary of insights from a high-level, closed-door roundtable held in New Delhi. This event took place in anticipation of the upcoming 2026 AI Impact Summit and shortly after India introduced the Digital Data Protection Act Rules along with its latest AI governance guidelines.

The roundtable centered on how Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) can serve as a foundational techno-legal framework for ensuring safe, equitable, and accountable AI governance in India.

Arun Teja Polcumpally, a JSW Science and Technology Fellow at ASPI Delhi and the author of the summary, emphasized the need for India’s AI governance framework to evolve in parallel with DPI. He stated, “For DPI to support responsible AI, it must be designed with built-in safeguards—fairness, inclusivity, equitable data access, privacy protection, secure interoperability, and broad scalability.”

During the session, participants put forth several strategic recommendations aimed at shaping India’s contributions to the discussions at the 2026 AI Impact Summit. They highlighted the necessity of robust legal and policy frameworks to implement DPIs as effective techno-legal tools for AI governance.

Furthermore, the participants noted that DPIs could facilitate AI development and deployment cycles by providing verifiable and transparent governance mechanisms. They stressed the importance of continuous investment, updates, and modernization of DPI systems to keep pace with the rapidly advancing landscape of AI technologies.

International cooperation was also underscored as essential for building open, secure, and transparent AI ecosystems. The group proposed that India should develop an open-source toolkit for designing DPI-based techno-legal mechanisms for AI governance, collaborating with global partners in a manner akin to the Universal DPI Safeguards framework.

Additionally, the roundtable participants recommended providing free or low-cost access to critical AI infrastructure. This includes GPU-based compute power, open-source AI models, regulatory sandboxes, and curated public datasets, all of which would help accelerate safe and responsible AI innovation.

In conjunction with these discussions, ASPI is hosting several upcoming events that delve into related topics. One such event is the launch of the “China 2026: What to Watch” report on December 10, featuring a keynote conversation with Ian Bremmer and panel discussions with leading experts on China.

Another event, scheduled for December 11, will focus on the evolving dynamics of U.S.-India relations, examining the developments that have affected ties in 2025 and the implications for the unfinished trade deal.

On December 16, ASPI will host a discussion on the risks and opportunities facing the U.S.-Japan alliance, featuring a panel of experts from various fields.

Members of the media interested in attending these events or accessing embargoed versions of the reports are encouraged to reach out via email to pr@asiasociety.org.

These initiatives reflect ASPI’s commitment to fostering dialogue and collaboration on critical issues surrounding AI governance and international relations, as highlighted in the recent roundtable discussions.

According to Asia Society Policy Institute.

The Story Behind Shen Yun: Understanding Its Cultural Significance

Shen Yun, a cultural performance founded by Chinese immigrants in 2006, has become a global phenomenon, despite facing ongoing persecution from the Chinese regime.

In 2006, a small group of first-generation Chinese immigrants, some of whom were fleeing religious persecution, gathered in upstate New York with a shared dream: to revive the traditional arts and culture that were being decimated in China. By the end of that year, they crafted the first performance of what would become Shen Yun.

In less than two decades, Shen Yun has transformed from humble beginnings into a global cultural phenomenon, performing across five continents and in over 200 cities each year. Today, it stands as a testament to beauty, faith, courage, and inspiration, celebrating two decades of artistic expression.

However, this American success story comes at a significant cost. Shen Yun was founded by practitioners of Falun Gong, a Buddhist spiritual practice that has faced brutal suppression by the Chinese regime. Although these artists sought freedom in the United States, they found that the dangers of persecution followed them across the ocean.

Over the years, the organization has experienced numerous challenges, including intrusions by Chinese spies at their headquarters, burglaries at artists’ homes, sabotage of their performance buses, cyberattacks on their websites, and pressure from Chinese embassies urging governments and theaters to cancel Shen Yun’s performances. Additionally, smear campaigns have targeted the group across various American media platforms.

Today, the persecution continues, manifesting in a series of lawsuits and death threats aimed at discrediting and destroying Shen Yun and its artists.

Despite this transnational persecution, Shen Yun remains steadfast in its vision and mission, continuing to thrive and garner overwhelmingly positive feedback from audiences around the world. The impact of their performances is evident, as many attendees describe their experiences as transformative and unforgettable.

Shen Yun is not merely a dance performance; it is a once-in-a-lifetime experience that invites audiences to witness the rich tapestry of Chinese culture and history. For those interested in attending, tickets can be purchased at ShenYun.com/CA or by calling the hotline at 888-633-6999.

According to India Currents, the resilience of Shen Yun in the face of adversity speaks volumes about the dedication of its founders and performers.

Indian-American Community Faces Challenges Amidst Changing Political Landscape

USCIS provides a comprehensive online resource for news, data, and updates related to immigration and citizenship.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) offers a centralized platform for accessing news releases and alerts through its dedicated USCIS News webpage. This resource is searchable by topic and date, ensuring that users can easily find the information they need.

In addition to news releases, the USCIS News webpage includes important updates on policies and procedures, as well as timely information regarding office closures and other emergencies that may affect service delivery.

For those interested in visual content, USCIS maintains a Video and Image Gallery showcasing various aspects of its operations. This gallery provides a glimpse into the work being done across the agency.

The agency also prioritizes transparency by offering a comprehensive Immigration and Citizenship Data page. This section presents a variety of immigration data and statistics, allowing users to delve into the numbers that reflect current immigration trends and patterns.

To keep the public informed, USCIS has established a robust social media presence. Through various social media accounts, individuals can follow the latest updates and gain insights into the agency’s activities and initiatives.

USCIS also shares important speeches, statements, and testimonies from its leadership. These documents are available for search by topic and date, providing valuable context and information about the agency’s priorities and objectives.

For those seeking specific information, the USCIS Electronic Reading Room offers access to documents identified under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Users can search for topics of interest using a convenient drop-down list.

Media representatives can find assistance through USCIS’s Media Contacts section, which connects them with agency representatives located throughout the country. This ensures that inquiries are addressed promptly and accurately.

Lastly, USCIS keeps the public informed about Upcoming Events, including both local and national engagements. This section highlights opportunities for community involvement and engagement with the agency.

For further details and updates, visit the USCIS News webpage, which serves as a vital resource for anyone interested in immigration and citizenship matters, according to USCIS.

US House Panel to Examine India-US Strategic Partnership on December 10

A U.S. congressional panel will hold a public hearing on December 10 to evaluate the India-U.S. strategic partnership, focusing on defense, economic, and diplomatic developments.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – A significant U.S. congressional panel is set to convene a public hearing next week to assess the trajectory of the India-U.S. strategic partnership. This hearing will particularly focus on the evolving defense, economic, and diplomatic dimensions of the relationship.

Titled “The U.S.-India Strategic Partnership: Securing a Free and Open Indo-Pacific,” the hearing is scheduled for December 10, as announced in an official notice from the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on South and Central Asia.

Chaired by Congressman Bill Huizenga of Michigan, the subcommittee will hear from prominent analysts who closely monitor India’s expanding role in the Indo-Pacific region.

Among the witnesses slated to testify are Jeff Smith, Director of the Asian Studies Centre at the Heritage Foundation; Dhruva Jaishankar, Executive Director of ORF America and the son of India’s External Affairs Minister; and Sameer Lalwani, Senior Fellow with the Indo-Pacific Program at the German Marshall Fund of the United States.

The hearing aims to delve into various aspects of the India-U.S. partnership, including India’s defense modernization, enhanced military interoperability with the United States, technology cooperation, regional diplomacy, and collaborative efforts to uphold a rules-based Indo-Pacific. This discussion comes at a time when Washington and New Delhi are expanding joint initiatives in critical technologies, maritime domain awareness, and supply-chain diversification.

The India-U.S. partnership has garnered sustained bipartisan interest in Congress, with lawmakers recognizing New Delhi as a crucial pillar of U.S. strategy in the Indo-Pacific. Hearings of this nature provide an essential platform for lawmakers to scrutinize policies, assess challenges, and reinforce long-term commitments to one of America’s most consequential bilateral relationships.

The announcement of this Congressional hearing coincides with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s arrival in New Delhi for a two-day state visit.

According to IANS, the upcoming hearing underscores the importance of the India-U.S. relationship in the context of global geopolitical dynamics.

Nick Fuentes Criticizes Indian-Americans Amid Controversial Remarks

Right-wing commentator Nick Fuentes has called for India to be added to the list of nations facing a full suspension of U.S. immigration visas, reflecting his ongoing anti-immigrant rhetoric.

WASHINGTON, DC – Controversial right-wing commentator Nick Fuentes has urged that India be included on a list of nineteen countries facing a complete suspension of immigration visas to the United States. This call comes amid a backdrop of his history of inflammatory remarks aimed at various minority groups, with critics often labeling him a neo-Nazi.

The push for India’s inclusion follows a recent shooting incident near the White House, involving an Afghan national who had entered the U.S. in 2021 under Operation Allies Welcome. The shooting, which targeted two National Guard soldiers, prompted the Department of Homeland Security to impose sweeping immigration restrictions.

The current suspension affects several nations, including Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela.

In a tweet, Fuentes stated, “Now do India,” echoing sentiments that resonate with segments of the MAGA base. He has previously argued that Indian nationals, who often enter the U.S. through H-1B visas, are taking jobs and college opportunities away from American citizens. This perspective frames legal immigration programs as being at odds with the America First ideology that Fuentes champions.

Fuentes’ remarks have sparked outrage among many who view his statements as part of a broader trend of xenophobia and racism that has gained traction in certain political circles. His call to restrict immigration from India reflects a growing sentiment among some right-wing factions that seek to limit immigration based on nationality and perceived economic competition.

As the debate over immigration policy continues to evolve, Fuentes’ comments serve as a reminder of the divisive rhetoric that can influence public opinion and policy decisions. The implications of such statements extend beyond mere commentary, potentially affecting the lives of countless individuals seeking opportunities in the United States.

While the Biden administration has made efforts to reform immigration policies, the specter of extremist views like those expressed by Fuentes remains a significant challenge in the ongoing discourse surrounding immigration in America.

As the situation develops, it will be crucial to monitor how these discussions shape the future of immigration policy and the treatment of various communities within the United States.

Source: Original article

Lower Dementia Risk Associated with Routine Vaccination, New Analysis Finds

The shingles vaccine may reduce dementia risk by 20% in older adults, according to a new study from Stanford Medicine, suggesting a potential cause-and-effect relationship.

A recent study from Stanford Medicine indicates that the shingles vaccine could significantly lower the risk of developing dementia among older adults. This research provides the first evidence suggesting a possible cause-and-effect relationship between shingles vaccination and dementia prevention.

According to the findings, older adults who received the shingles vaccine were found to be 20% less likely to develop dementia over a seven-year period compared to those who did not receive the vaccine. Dr. Pascal Geldsetzer, assistant professor of medicine and senior author of the study, emphasized the importance of these findings, stating, “For the first time, we now have evidence that likely shows a cause-and-effect relationship between shingles vaccination and dementia prevention and treatment.”

The study utilized public health data from Wales, where eligibility for the shingles vaccine, known as Zostavax, was determined by birth date. This unique situation created two nearly identical groups of older adults—those born just before the cutoff who qualified for the vaccine and those born just after who did not. This design allowed researchers to compare dementia rates while minimizing biases typically found in observational studies.

Following an initial analysis conducted in April, researchers delved deeper into the data and discovered that the benefits of the vaccine extended beyond just preventing dementia. Over a nine-year period, individuals who received the vaccine were less likely to be diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment. Moreover, those who were vaccinated after receiving a dementia diagnosis had a significantly lower risk of dying from dementia within the following nine years. This suggests that the vaccine may also slow the progression of the disease.

In the follow-up period, nearly half of the Welsh seniors diagnosed with dementia at the start of the vaccination program ultimately died from the condition. In contrast, only 30% of those who had received the vaccine experienced the same fate.

Dr. Geldsetzer noted, “There is a growing body of research showing that viruses that preferentially target your nervous system and hibernate in your nervous system for much of your life may be implicated in the development of dementia.” This includes the chickenpox virus, which remains dormant in the body and can reactivate in older age, leading to shingles. Such reactivation may trigger inflammation in or around the brain, a factor linked to dementia risk, according to experts from the Mayo Clinic.

Preventing viral flare-ups through vaccination could potentially reduce inflammation, thereby lowering the risk of dementia. However, the researchers acknowledged a significant limitation in their study: the health behaviors of vaccinated individuals may differ from those who are unvaccinated. Dr. Geldsetzer pointed out, “We have very little, if any, information on these behaviors in electronic health records or medical claims data.” This lack of data includes crucial factors such as dietary habits and physical activity levels.

Dr. Geldsetzer further emphasized the potential implications of their findings, stating, “If the shingles vaccine really prevents or delays dementia—and, with this new study, also appears to have benefits for those who already have dementia—then this would be a hugely important finding for clinical medicine, population health, and research into the causes of dementia.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to manufacturers of the shingles vaccine for comments regarding the study.

Source: Original article

Apple Challenges India’s Antitrust Penalty Law in Court

Apple is challenging India’s antitrust penalty law, which calculates fines based on global turnover, amid ongoing investigations into its practices in the Indian iOS ecosystem.

Apple is gearing up for a significant legal battle in India as it seeks to contest antitrust proceedings initiated by the Competition Commission of India (CCI). The tech giant aims to challenge a law that permits penalties to be calculated based on a company’s global turnover, a move that could have substantial implications for its operations in the country.

Since 2022, the CCI has been investigating Apple over allegations of abusing its dominant position in the Indian iOS ecosystem. Central to the investigation is the company’s requirement that app developers utilize its in-app purchase (IAP) system, which can impose fees as high as 30%. Critics argue that this practice stifles competition by limiting alternative payment methods.

Reports indicate that Apple could face a staggering penalty of up to $38 billion. This figure has been influenced by claims from Tinder-owner Match Group and various Indian startups, who have convinced the CCI that Apple’s IAP fees are detrimental to smaller competitors and constitute anti-competitive behavior.

From the CCI’s perspective, as well as that of several legal experts, calculating fines based on global turnover is crucial for ensuring a deterrent effect, particularly in digital markets where revenue generated in India represents only a fraction of a global tech firm’s total earnings.

As of December 2025, no final penalty has been imposed on Apple. The Delhi High Court is tasked with determining the validity of the amended penalty law and its applicability in this case. The court’s decision is anticipated to have far-reaching consequences, not only for Apple but also for the broader regulatory landscape governing global tech companies in India.

On Monday, a lawyer representing the CCI accused Apple of attempting to “stall the proceedings,” which date back to 2021. In response, Apple’s legal counsel urged the court to prevent the regulator from taking any coercive actions.

In a private submission to the CCI reported by Reuters in October, Match Group argued that calculating penalties based on global turnover could serve as a significant deterrent against repeat offenses. This case underscores the intricate relationship between regulatory authority, the business models of digital markets, and the interpretation of competition law.

The scrutiny of global technology firms, particularly regarding mandatory in-app payment systems, highlights the challenges regulators face when assessing practices that may restrict competition or disadvantage smaller players.

India’s amended competition law, which allows for fines based on global turnover and enables retrospective application, has ignited discussions about fairness, proportionality, and the extent of regulatory power. While Apple contends that these measures are excessive and legally questionable, regulators and some experts maintain that global-turnover calculations are vital for ensuring effective deterrence in rapidly evolving digital markets.

The outcome of this case could establish a precedent for how India approaches antitrust enforcement against global tech companies, shaping future disputes at the intersection of innovation, competition, and consumer protection.

Source: Original article

Federal Appeals Court Affirms Block on Iowa’s Anti-Immigrant Law

In a significant ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has upheld an injunction against Iowa’s controversial anti-immigrant law, SF 2340, protecting immigrant families and reinforcing constitutional limits on state authority.

On October 23, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit delivered a decisive victory for immigrant communities and the rule of law by upholding an injunction that blocks Iowa’s Senate File 2340 (SF 2340). This law, described as Iowa’s most severe anti-immigration measure, would have criminalized the presence of certain immigrants in the state, even those who are legally authorized to reside in the United States.

SF 2340 aimed to empower local officials to arrest and deport immigrants, a power that the Constitution reserves for federal authorities. This provision was intended to prevent a fragmented immigration policy that could lead to family separations and chaos across state lines.

“This is a tremendous relief for thousands of Iowa families,” stated Erica Johnson, the founding executive director of the Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice (Iowa MMJ), the organization that initiated the lawsuit. “The court’s decision confirms that key members of our community should never have been criminalized simply for being here and living their lives in peace. This ruling restores a sense of safety and dignity to people who call Iowa home.”

The lawsuit, titled Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice v. Bird, was filed by Iowa MMJ alongside two individual plaintiffs, with legal representation from the ACLU of Iowa, the ACLU Immigrant Rights Project, and the American Immigration Council.

Under SF 2340, non-citizens who had previously been deported or denied entry into the United States would have faced criminal charges for residing in Iowa, regardless of any subsequent lawful status or federal permission to return. Additionally, the law would have allowed state and local law enforcement to detain individuals based solely on their presence in the state, while mandating state judges to issue deportation orders. Such powers are constitutionally designated to the federal government to prevent the disarray that could arise from varying state laws.

“SF 2340 is the worst anti-immigrant law in Iowa’s history. Today’s ruling keeps SF 2340 blocked and protects immigrants in Iowa from many serious harms: arrest, detention, deportation, family separation, and incarceration, all by the state,” remarked Rita Bettis Austen, legal director of the ACLU of Iowa. “At a time when the federal government is causing so much harm to families, it’s all the more important that the state is not permitted to make things even worse. The Court reaffirmed that the Iowa legislature does not have the authority to pass its own immigration laws to detain and deport people.”

The law was enacted on April 10, 2024, but was blocked from taking effect on June 17, 2024. Following this, the state of Iowa appealed the decision. With the recent ruling from the Eighth Circuit, the law remains blocked while the case continues in federal court.

Emma Winger, deputy legal director at the American Immigration Council, emphasized the broader implications of the Eighth Circuit’s decision, stating, “The Eighth Circuit’s decision resonates far beyond Iowa. Across the country, we’re seeing states attempt to take immigration enforcement into their own hands. This could create a reality in which a person could be welcomed in one state and arrested in the next, just for crossing a border. Under our Constitution, immigration has to be handled at a federal level so families aren’t trapped in chaos. This ruling upholds that principle.”

Spencer Amdur, senior staff attorney at the ACLU’s national immigrants’ rights project, echoed these sentiments, noting, “Today the Eighth Circuit reiterated what the Supreme Court has said for over a hundred years: States have no business regulating immigration on their own. This law would have torn families apart and denied people their right to live in this country and seek legal protections. The court was right to strike it down, just like courts have done for other laws like this around the country.”

The ongoing legal battle surrounding SF 2340 underscores the critical importance of maintaining a unified federal immigration policy, safeguarding the rights and dignity of immigrant families across the United States.

Source: Original article

US Tech Giants Oppose India’s Proposed 6 GHz Spectrum Allocation

Major American tech companies are opposing India’s plans to allocate the six gigahertz spectrum band for mobile services, advocating instead for its exclusive use for Wi-Fi applications.

American tech giants, including Apple, Amazon, Cisco, Meta, HP, and Intel, have expressed strong opposition to the request by India’s telecom companies, Reliance Jio and Vodafone Idea, to allocate the six gigahertz (GHz) spectrum band for mobile services.

In a joint submission to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), the companies urged regulators to reserve the entire 6 GHz band exclusively for Wi-Fi services. They argue that the band is not technically or commercially ready for deployment in mobile networks.

The joint submission emphasized the need for caution regarding future auctions of specific frequency ranges within the 6 GHz band. “We do not recommend setting timelines for any future auction of the 6425-6725 MHz and 7025-7125 MHz ranges for IMT,” the document stated. It further suggested that TRAI and the Department of Telecommunications should review the allocation of the upper 6 GHz band following the outcomes of the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-27), particularly concerning Agenda Item 1.7, which pertains to the 7.125-8.4 GHz range.

The tech companies proposed that any portion of the upper 6 GHz spectrum that is not immediately utilized should be opened for unlicensed use on an interim basis. This would allow Wi-Fi and other low-power technologies to help bridge the connectivity gap. Government plans indicate that 400 MHz of spectrum in the 6 GHz range will soon be available for auction, with an additional 300 MHz expected to be released by 2030. Furthermore, 500 MHz has been earmarked for delicensing, making it accessible for low-power applications, including Wi-Fi services.

Despite the government’s intention to delicense 500 MHz of the lower 6 GHz band for Wi-Fi and other low-power uses, Reliance Jio has called for the inclusion of the full 1,200 MHz of spectrum in the upcoming auction. The company argues that the entire band, encompassing both lower and upper ranges, should be made available for mobile services to facilitate the expansion of 5G and future 6G networks.

The newly identified frequency blocks of 6425–6725 MHz and 6725–7125 MHz are part of the upper 6 GHz band, which telecom operators view as crucial for enhancing network capacity. However, tech firms maintain that these frequencies are better suited for high-performance Wi-Fi applications.

Vodafone Idea has also requested that 400 MHz of the 6 GHz spectrum currently available be included in the next auction. Meanwhile, Bharti Airtel has advocated for a postponement of the 6 GHz auction, citing concerns regarding ecosystem readiness, including device availability, network infrastructure, and the absence of global standardization.

Qualcomm, a U.S.-based chipset manufacturer, has echoed similar concerns, emphasizing the necessity for a more mature ecosystem before deploying the spectrum for mobile services. “The upper 6 GHz band is critical for mobile growth in India, and it may be noted that several other countries, like China, Brazil, and various European nations, are considering the entire 700 MHz in this Upper 6 GHz band for 6G,” Qualcomm stated. The company added that deferring the auction of the 6425-6725 MHz and 7025-7125 MHz bands until after WRC-27 would safeguard India’s 6G future, align with global standards, and support its leadership aspirations.

The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), which represents major telecom players including Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel, and Vodafone Idea, has voiced strong opposition to the government’s plan to delicense the 6 GHz band. COAI described delicensing as “misleading and counterproductive,” arguing that licensed IMT spectrum ensures quality of service, predictable performance, and nationwide scalability—elements deemed vital for initiatives like Digital Bharat and 6G applications such as connected mobility, automation, and industrial networks.

Furthermore, COAI expressed concerns that unlicensed Wi-Fi deployments by global over-the-top (OTT) players and device manufacturers could undermine licensed usage in the band, reduce government revenues, and create an uneven playing field for telecom operators.

As the debate continues, the future of the 6 GHz spectrum in India remains uncertain, with significant implications for both mobile and Wi-Fi services in the country.

Source: Original article

Harvard Economist Discusses India’s Post-Covid Growth Compared to Major Economies

India has emerged as the leading performer among major global economies in the post-pandemic era, according to Harvard economist Jason Furman’s analysis.

India has distinguished itself as the strongest performer among major global economies in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a recent analysis by Harvard economist Jason Furman. His comparative growth chart, shared on X, highlights how real GDP across key economies has shifted relative to their pre-COVID trajectories, with India notably exceeding its long-term growth trend.

Furman’s graph tracks the economic performance of the United States, Euro Area, China, Russia, and India from 2019 through projected figures for the third quarter of 2025. While many economies continue to grapple with the lingering effects of the pandemic, India’s growth trajectory stands out, showing a significant rise that is expected to reach +3% in 2024 and potentially +5% by the third quarter of 2025.

Furman emphasized that India’s impressive growth is not merely a temporary rebound but rather a result of its structural strengths. These include advancements in digital infrastructure, investment-friendly reforms, and a stable macroeconomic environment.

The chart illustrates a sharp decline for all major economies in 2020:

Euro Area: –25%

China: –10%

United States: –5%

India: –5%

Russia: –8%

Since that time, the recovery paths of these nations have diverged significantly.

The United States experienced a rapid recovery, bolstered by substantial fiscal support measures like the American Rescue Plan, allowing it to stand approximately +2% above trend by 2025. However, India’s resurgence far surpasses the post-pandemic recovery of the U.S.

India not only returned to its pre-COVID growth trend by 2022 but has also surged beyond it. Furman noted the following milestones:

2022: India regains its trendline

2024: Expected growth of +3%

Q3 2025 projection: +5%

According to Furman, the sustained momentum of India’s growth is driven by several factors, including:

Expanding domestic consumption

Strong investment inflows

Rapid rollout of digital infrastructure, including initiatives like UPI, Aadhaar, and e-governance

Production-linked incentives that bolster manufacturing

A stable policy environment

In contrast, China continues to struggle with challenges stemming from real estate stress and the after-effects of its zero-COVID policy, with projections indicating growth around –5% by 2025. Russia, hindered by sanctions following its invasion of Ukraine, is expected to remain near –8%. The Euro Area, impacted by energy shocks and inflation, is projected to hover around –3%. While the U.S. is recovering, it faces concentration risks; Furman pointed out that 92% of U.S. growth in early 2025 is anticipated to come solely from AI-driven data center investments.

International institutions are echoing confidence in India’s economic momentum. ICRA forecasts a GDP growth of 7% in the second quarter of FY26, with industrial output projected to rise to a five-quarter high of 7.8%. Moody’s Ratings also projects growth of 7% in 2025 and 6.4% in 2026, identifying India as the clear outperformer in the Asia-Pacific region, excluding Greater China. Across the Asia-Pacific, Moody’s expects average growth to be just 3.4%, significantly lower than India’s anticipated pace.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates suggest that India could sustain an annual growth rate of 7-8%, driven by digital expansion, manufacturing incentives, a youthful workforce, and resilient services exports. Economists increasingly view India not only as a standout performer but also as a potential development model for other emerging economies navigating global uncertainties.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Ron Hira Defines H-1B as Guest Worker Program

Indian American scholar Ron Hira critiques the H-1B visa program, highlighting its role in worker exploitation and the displacement of American employees during a recent panel discussion.

Indian American scholar Ron Hira, a professor at Howard University and a noted critic of the H-1B visa system, recently shared his insights on the program’s impact on American workers. Speaking at a panel discussion titled “How the H-1B Visa Led to Importing Mass Cheap Labor,” hosted by The Heritage Foundation, Hira outlined the reasons many U.S. employers favor hiring foreign visa holders over American workers.

Hira is well-known for his research on offshoring, high-skilled immigration, and the effects of these practices on employment relations and the middle class. During the panel, he discussed the effectiveness of executive actions taken during the Trump administration aimed at reforming the H-1B program. He remarked, “Back then, 20 years ago, it was obvious that H-1B visa abuse was critical in speeding up the offshoring of these jobs. Yet for the past 20 years, Washington has turned a blind eye to this abuse.”

Hira referenced a 2017 segment from “60 Minutes” that profiled American workers forced to train their H-1B replacements. He highlighted a particularly troubling case involving the University of California, which receives significant state and federal funding to train scientists and engineers. “Now they’re forcing their own tech workers to train their H-1B replacements. Imagine the workers’ humiliation and sense of betrayal,” he said.

He posed a rhetorical question to the audience: “Does anybody really think that that’s how the program is supposed to operate?” He answered his own question, stating, “It’s certainly not sold that way. But it persists today. People are training their replacements today.”

Hira explained that the H-1B program is fundamentally a guest worker program, which he argues is more about labor policy than immigration policy. “All guest worker programs leave workers vulnerable to exploitation, whether it’s high-skilled H-1B or lower-skilled H-2A and H-2B,” he noted. “We need labor policies that protect both American and foreign workers.”

He criticized the current labor protections and regulations surrounding the H-1B program as inadequate, stating, “The H-1B labor protections and regulations and rules are a complete fiasco.” Hira emphasized the need for a redesign of these labor regulations to ensure that the H-1B program does not depress wages, protects workers, and fulfills its intended purpose of addressing genuine labor shortages without displacing American workers.

To illustrate his points, Hira provided real-world examples of how employers exploit the system. He described a situation involving Deloitte Consulting, a top H-1B employer, which claimed that a senior consultant position was actually an entry-level role for the purpose of determining the prevailing wage for H-1B workers. “Now is a senior consultant entry level? Probably not,” he remarked.

Hira expressed further concerns about the H-1B program, stating, “You have thousands of H-1B eligible workers who are just sitting overseas waiting for billable jobs to show up. That’s against the law. Nobody’s enforcing it.” He called for limitations on the types of organizations eligible for H-1B cap exemptions, arguing that these have been expanded too broadly. He also urged the Department of Homeland Security to overhaul the L-1 visa and optional practical training programs, which he noted have even fewer protections than the H-1B program.

He suggested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Department of Justice should investigate employment discrimination by auditing all mass H-1B employers and intervening in whistleblower lawsuits related to guest worker abuse.

Hira concluded by urging Congress to consider a broader transformation of the skilled immigration system in the U.S. “Our U.S. skilled immigration system has almost no immigration in it. It’s almost entirely guest worker programs,” he stated. He highlighted the disparity between the number of skilled guest workers and available green card slots, noting that there are about 1.5 million skilled guest workers competing for approximately 60,000 green card slots.

As discussions around immigration policy continue, Hira’s insights shed light on the complexities and challenges associated with the H-1B visa program, emphasizing the need for reform to protect both American and foreign workers.

Source: Original article

Ex-Pakistan Captain Azhar Ali Resigns from PCB Positions Citing Red Tape

Azhar Ali, the former captain of Pakistan’s Test cricket team, has stepped down from his roles within the Pakistan Cricket Board, citing bureaucratic challenges as a key reason for his departure.

Azhar Ali, who previously led the Pakistan Test cricket team, has officially resigned from his positions within the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB). His departure includes roles on the national selection committee and as the head of the youth development department at the National Cricket Academy.

Ali’s decision comes amid ongoing concerns regarding the bureaucratic processes within the PCB, which he has indicated have hindered effective decision-making and progress in his roles. The former captain’s resignation highlights the challenges faced by those involved in cricket administration in Pakistan.

His tenure in these positions was marked by a commitment to nurturing young talent and improving the overall structure of cricket in the country. However, the frustrations associated with red tape have ultimately led him to step away from these responsibilities.

Ali’s contributions to Pakistani cricket, both as a player and an administrator, have been significant. He has been a prominent figure in the sport, known for his leadership on the field and his dedication to developing the next generation of cricketers.

As the PCB continues to navigate its internal challenges, Ali’s resignation serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in cricket governance in Pakistan. His departure may prompt discussions about the need for reforms to streamline processes and enhance the effectiveness of cricket administration.

According to Source Name, the impact of Ali’s resignation may resonate beyond his immediate roles, potentially influencing future appointments and the overall direction of cricket management in the country.

Source: Original article

Ami Bera and Joe Wilson Strengthen U.S.-India Relations with Bipartisan Resolution

U.S. Representatives Ami Bera and Joe Wilson have introduced a bipartisan resolution to strengthen the strategic partnership between the United States and India, emphasizing cooperation across various sectors.

U.S. Representatives Ami Bera, M.D. (D-CA), the longest-serving Indian American Member of Congress, and Joe Wilson (R-SC) have introduced a bipartisan resolution that recognizes the strategic value of the historical partnership between the United States and India.

This resolution highlights decades of deepening cooperation between two of the world’s largest democracies across critical sectors, including defense, technology, trade, counterterrorism, and education. It also emphasizes India’s essential role in promoting regional stability, economic growth, and a free and open Indo-Pacific.

According to the resolution, “For more than three decades, it has been the policy of the United States under administrations of Presidents Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden to strengthen the strategic partnership with India, recognizing its importance to regional stability, democratic governance, economic growth, and shared regional priorities.”

The measure calls for continued collaboration between the United States and India to address 21st-century challenges, ranging from counterterrorism and cyber threats to emerging technologies. It also acknowledges the enduring people-to-people ties between the two nations, which are further strengthened by the Indian American diaspora.

The resolution has received robust bipartisan support, with a total of 24 original cosponsors. Notable supporters include Representatives Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA), Rich McCormick (R-GA), Deborah Ross (D-NC), Rob Wittman (R-VA), Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), James Moylan (R-GU), Brad Schneider (D-IL), Young Kim (R-CA), Sanford Bishop (D-GA), Buddy Carter (R-GA), Shri Thanedar (D-MI), David Schweikert (R-AZ), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Michael Baumgartner (R-WA), Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA), Bill Huizenga (R-MI), Brad Sherman (D-CA), Don Bacon (R-NE), Marc Veasey (D-TX), Andy Barr (R-KY), Ed Case (D-HI), and Jay Obernolte (R-CA).

The full text of the resolution is available for those interested in exploring its details further.

Source: Original article

Inclusivity Highlighted at Bengaluru Skill Summit 2025 for Indian Professionals

The Bengaluru Skill Summit 2025 highlighted the critical need for inclusivity in skill development, emphasizing that it should be integral to organizational systems rather than a mere checkbox exercise.

The Bengaluru Skill Summit 2025, held from November 4 to 6 at the Lalit Ashok, brought together key figures from various sectors to discuss the importance of inclusivity in skill development. Hosted by the Department of Skill Development, Entrepreneurship and Livelihood, the summit featured prominent ministers, entrepreneurs, and industry leaders.

During his keynote address, Dr. Sharanaprakash R. Patil, Karnataka’s minister for skill development, entrepreneurship, livelihood, and medical education, underscored the significance of inclusive skill development. “True progress is inclusive,” he stated, emphasizing the need for initiatives that reach rural youth, women, self-help groups, marginalized communities, persons with disabilities, and traditional artisans and craftsmen.

The following day, a panel discussion titled “Inclusive Skilling as the Next Growth Multiplier” featured experts including Dr. Gayathri Vasudevan, chief impact officer at the Sambhav Foundation; Giorgia A. Varisco, chief of YuWaah (Generation Unlimited India) at UNICEF India; Prateek Madhav, CEO and co-founder of AssisTech Foundation (ATF); and Veenu Jaichand, partner at EY. The panelists explored the dual nature of inclusivity as both a moral and economic imperative.

The discussion highlighted that increasing women’s participation in India’s workforce from 37% to 50% could significantly enhance economic growth. The panelists also addressed the exclusion of individuals with disabilities from formal employment sectors. “If we take a step to include people with disabilities, skill them, and give them an equal opportunity for employment, we are talking about a contribution of 5–7% of GDP as well,” Madhav noted.

Another panel, “Ecosystem Synergy — Driving Skills Innovation Through Collaboration,” focused on how partnerships among government, industry, academia, and social enterprises can advance skilling initiatives. Dr. Abhilasha Gaur, CEO of NASSCOM IT-ITeS SSC, spoke on the necessity of including women workers in efforts to future-proof the workforce. She also highlighted the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

The theme of inclusivity resurfaced during a subsequent panel discussion titled “Industry Voices: How Inclusion Matters for Business,” featuring Saraswathi Ramachandra, managing director of Lightcast India, and Dr. Padmini Ram, founding director of Urban Ethnographers. The panelists stressed that inclusivity should not be viewed as a checkbox exercise but rather as a fundamental aspect of organizational systems.

They argued that one-day workshops and token hiring measures are insufficient; instead, inclusion must be deeply embedded in workplace policies and culture to be effective.

The Bengaluru Skill Summit 2025 served as a vital platform for discussing the multifaceted benefits of inclusivity in skill development, reinforcing the idea that true progress requires comprehensive and sustained efforts.

Source: Original article

Trump Purchases $82 Million in Bonds Since Taking Office

President Donald Trump has reportedly invested at least $82 million in corporate and municipal bonds since taking office, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest.

President Donald Trump has made a series of notable financial investments during his time in office, with recent disclosures revealing that he purchased at least $82 million in corporate and municipal bonds between late August and early October 2025. These investments include sectors that may directly benefit from his administration’s policies.

The information was released by the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, detailing over 175 financial transactions conducted by Trump from August 28 to October 2. The disclosures, mandated by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, do not specify the exact amounts for each transaction but provide broad ranges. This lack of specificity means that the total value of his bond purchases could potentially reach as high as $337 million.

Among the bonds purchased are municipal securities issued by various state and local governments, including those from counties, school districts, and public utilities. These bonds are typically considered lower-risk investments, as they are used to fund local projects and are often tax-exempt at the federal level, and sometimes at the state and local levels if purchased in the investor’s home state. However, certain municipal bonds, such as private activity bonds, are taxable, and the tax-exempt status of these bonds has been a topic of political debate in 2025.

In contrast, corporate bonds, which are also part of Trump’s portfolio, are issued by companies to raise capital for various purposes, including expansion and operations. These bonds generally offer higher interest rates compared to municipal bonds, compensating for the increased credit risk associated with corporate debt. Interest income from corporate bonds is subject to taxation at both federal and state levels.

Notably, some of the corporate bonds acquired by Trump include offerings from well-known companies such as Broadcom and Qualcomm in the technology sector, as well as Meta Platforms, Home Depot, CVS Health, and major Wall Street banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. The selection of these investments has raised eyebrows among analysts and ethics observers, as some of these companies could potentially benefit from federal policies enacted during Trump’s presidency.

The scale and timing of these transactions have attracted scrutiny, as they are unusual for a sitting president. Observers have expressed concerns regarding the implications of such a significant fixed-income portfolio, which combines both municipal and corporate holdings. The potential for conflicts of interest, given the nature of the investments and their alignment with Trump’s policy initiatives, has become a focal point of discussion.

As the details of these financial activities continue to unfold, the intersection of Trump’s investments and his presidential duties remains a subject of interest and concern among the public and ethics watchdogs alike.

Source: Original article

Golden Toilet Scandal Puts Zelenskyy in Deepest Crisis Yet

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy faces a significant crisis as a corruption scandal involving his associates threatens his leadership amid ongoing war efforts against Russia.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is confronting one of the most challenging moments of his presidency following a corruption investigation that implicates members of his inner circle. This investigation has reportedly uncovered a scheme involving the embezzlement of approximately $100 million from Ukraine’s energy sector during the ongoing conflict with Russia.

According to a former government official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, the scandal has raised serious concerns about the morale of Ukrainians in their fight against Russian aggression. “Ukrainians don’t have any motivation to fight now because of enormous human rights violations and also because of this corruption now exposed,” the official stated.

The investigation, dubbed “Operation Midas” by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), has revealed allegations that associates of Zelenskyy have been involved in a scheme to siphon funds meant for energy projects designed to protect critical infrastructure during wartime. The former official claimed, “People inside the country are already seeing this corruption, and this is just part of the corrupt swamp. Zelenskyy is part of the problem.”

Since Russia’s invasion in 2022, scrutiny of Ukraine’s financial systems has intensified, with accusations that some individuals have been taking kickbacks from energy contracts. This situation has sparked public outrage and eroded trust in the government. The former official remarked, “This money laundering appeared to have been going on since 2022, and there were a lot of people who tried to stop this.” They further alleged that some believe Zelenskyy was aware of these schemes and may have even approved them.

In one prominent case, businessman Tymur Mindich, who co-owned the entertainment company Kvartal 95 with Zelenskyy, has been identified as a key figure in the alleged corruption. Reports indicate that investigators discovered bags of cash and a gold-plated toilet in one of Mindich’s apartments. The former official noted, “Tymur had an apartment with golden toilets that was in the same building as Zelenskyy’s, and in 2021, Zelenskyy celebrated his birthday in Tymur’s apartment.”

Another individual under investigation is Oleksiy Chernyshov, a former deputy prime minister with close ties to Zelenskyy’s family. Allegations against Chernyshov include abuse of office and the construction of several luxury homes in Kyiv. The former official claimed, “Chernyshov started building big, three or four huge houses in their most luxury place in Kyiv.”

In response to the unfolding scandal, Zelenskyy has publicly emphasized the need for accountability. During a recent address, he stated, “Everyone who put together a corrupt scheme must receive a clear legal response. There must be criminal verdicts.” He underscored the importance of maintaining integrity within the energy sector and pledged to keep Energoatom free from corruption.

Zelenskyy also commended the efforts of the Anti-Corruption Bureau, asserting, “Any effective actions against corruption are very needed. The inevitability of punishment is necessary.” However, the former official expressed skepticism about Zelenskyy’s commitment to accountability, suggesting that he is adept at managing public relations and unlikely to resign amid the investigation. “Zelenskyy is not the kind of person who feels shame even if there’s a corruption probe,” they claimed.

The former official also noted a shift in public sentiment, suggesting that many Ukrainians are increasingly supportive of former President Donald Trump, who they believe has influenced the narrative surrounding the war. “If not [for] Donald Trump, we would not be talking about peace today at all, and every day of war is destroying Ukraine,” they stated.

As the investigation continues, Zelenskyy’s administration faces mounting pressure to address the allegations and restore public trust in the government during a time of crisis.

Source: Original article

Missouri Senator Advocates Overhaul or End of OPT Work Program

Senator Eric Schmitt of Missouri is advocating for a comprehensive review of the Optional Practical Training program, calling it a “cheap-labor pipeline” that disadvantages American workers.

Senator Eric Schmitt, a Republican from Missouri, has formally requested a thorough review of the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, which permits international students graduating from U.S. universities to work in the country. In a letter addressed to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, Schmitt expressed his support for the agency’s reported plans to either reform or terminate the program.

The OPT program allows international graduates to work in the United States for up to twelve months after completing their degree, with those in STEM fields eligible for an additional twenty-four-month extension. However, the program has come under increasing scrutiny, particularly in the context of the Trump administration’s hardline stance on illegal immigration and employment-based visas like the H-1B. Once viewed as a relatively uncontroversial benefit for international students, OPT is now facing calls for reevaluation from policymakers who argue that any pathway allowing foreign graduates to work in the U.S. should be reconsidered under the “America First” immigration framework.

Schmitt, who was elected to the Senate in November 2022, highlighted that the OPT program was established administratively and lacks explicit congressional authorization. He contended that the program primarily serves the interests of large corporations and academic institutions while placing American workers at a disadvantage.

In his letter, Schmitt stated, “In light of your administration’s continued commitment to America First immigration policy, I write to you in strong support of ongoing discussions surrounding reforms to the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program.” He further noted that recent reports indicate DHS plans to overhaul or eliminate OPT, which he views as a necessary correction to a program he describes as one of the most abused in the U.S. immigration system.

The senator criticized the current state of the OPT program, asserting that it has deviated from its original purpose. He remarked, “Today, however, the program functions as a cheap-labor pipeline for big business—and a backdoor into the U.S. job market for foreign workers.” Schmitt emphasized that the OPT program serves the financial interests of large corporations and academic institutions at the expense of young American workers and students.

He elaborated on the negative impact of the program, stating, “This system boxes young Americans out of the workforce, discriminates against American workers in favor of foreign labor, and suppresses wages and job opportunities for U.S. graduates.” Schmitt also expressed concerns that the program distorts the higher education landscape, incentivizing colleges to operate as “visa mills” and posing threats to national security and economic prosperity.

Schmitt pointed out that the OPT program was created and expanded by unelected bureaucrats in the executive branch, circumventing the legislative process. He argued that this lack of congressional oversight means that the program could potentially be reformed or terminated through executive action.

The senator also highlighted the financial motivations for universities to promote work permits for foreign students, noting that these students often pay significantly higher tuition fees than their American counterparts. He stated, “As a result, many would argue that young Americans are being boxed out of both the workforce and the university system in their own country.”

Schmitt provided statistics to support his claims, noting that foreign students now make up 20 to 30 percent of total enrollment at many elite and public universities, with even higher percentages in graduate programs. For instance, he cited that last year, 39 percent of Columbia University’s student body was international, while nearly 44 percent of New York University’s enrollment fell into this category, representing a 244 percent increase since 2013.

In addition to his concerns about the OPT program, Schmitt has also voiced criticism regarding H-1B visas. He alleged that some U.S. companies are misusing these visas to staff diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) offices. He remarked on social media, “The H-1B visa was sold as a way to keep America ‘competitive.’ Instead, it imported millions of foreign nationals to replace American workers—and transferred entire industries into the hands of foreign lobbies.”

Schmitt’s advocacy for a review of the OPT program reflects a broader trend among lawmakers who are increasingly scrutinizing immigration policies and their implications for the American workforce.

Source: Original article

Britain Unveils Major Changes to Asylum Policies for Refugees

Britain has announced a significant overhaul of its asylum policy, inspired by Denmark’s stringent immigration measures, marking the most substantial changes to its refugee system in modern history.

Britain is set to implement a major overhaul of its asylum policy, introducing longer wait times for permanent residency and mandating the return of refugees to their home countries once deemed safe. This shift represents the largest transformation of asylum seeker policies in modern times, drawing inspiration from Denmark, which is known for its strict immigration regulations and has faced considerable scrutiny from human rights organizations.

The Labour government in Britain has intensified its immigration stance in response to the rising popularity of the populist Reform U.K. party, which advocates for a stringent approach to immigration. As a result, Labour has felt compelled to adopt a tougher position on asylum seekers.

Among the key changes announced by the Home Office are the revocation of the statutory duty to provide housing and financial support to certain asylum seekers. Additionally, refugees will now have to wait 20 years to apply for permanent residency, a significant increase from the current five-year period. The duration of initial refugee status will be reduced from five years to two and a half years, and the rules governing family reunifications will be tightened. Furthermore, refugees will be encouraged or required to return to their home countries once it is considered safe.

The Home Office indicated that these measures will apply to asylum seekers who are able to work but choose not to, as well as those who engage in illegal activities. Support funded by taxpayers will be prioritized for individuals who contribute positively to the economy and local communities.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood stated that the changes aim to make the United Kingdom less appealing to illegal migrants and facilitate the removal of individuals whose asylum claims are denied. “This country has a proud tradition of welcoming those fleeing danger, but our generosity is drawing illegal migrants across the Channel,” Mahmood remarked. “The pace and scale of migration is placing immense pressure on communities.”

In response to these proposed changes, more than 100 British charities have urged Mahmood to “end the scapegoating of migrants and performative policies that only cause harm.” They argue that these measures exacerbate racism and violence against vulnerable populations.

Britain’s Refugee Council emphasized on social media platform X that refugees do not compare asylum systems when fleeing danger. Many seek asylum in the U.K. due to family connections, some familiarity with the English language, or existing networks that can help them rebuild their lives safely.

As the U.K. government moves forward with these sweeping changes, the implications for asylum seekers and the broader community remain to be seen.

Source: Original article

President Donald Trump proposed $2000 checks to US Citizens

President Donald Trump shared exciting news on Nov. 9 about plans to give Americans outside the “high income” groups $2,000 each, funded from tariffs collected by his administration.

He expressed optimism on social media, saying, “We are taking in Trillions of Dollars and will soon begin paying down our ENORMOUS DEBT, $37 trillion. There’s been a record investment boom in the USA, with new plants and factories popping up everywhere. A bonus of at least $2000 per person (excluding those with high incomes!) will be paid to everyone.”

For this plan to move forward, it will need support from Congress. Back in July, Senator Josh Hawley introduced the American Worker Rebate Act, aiming to use tariff revenue to provide tax rebates of at least $600 for each adult and child, based on income.

According to the Treasury Department, in the first three quarters of 2025, the government collected $195 billion in customs duties — enough to give 97.5 million people a $2,000 check.

There were about 267 million adults living in the U.S. in 2024, according to 2020 Census estimates. Data from YouGov Profiles shows that roughly 18% of these adults earned more than $100,000 a year, which would mean they are not eligible for the dividend.

Currently, the average tariff rate for goods entering the U.S. stands at 18%, the highest since 1934, according to Yale’s Budget Lab. There’s ongoing debate about how much of these tariffs are passed on to consumers.

DHS Ends Automatic EAD Extensions, Impacting Indian-American Communities

A recent rule change by the Department of Homeland Security has left many visa-dependent professionals, particularly Indian women on H-4 EADs, facing uncertainty and potential job loss.

In a significant shift that has left many work-based visa holders in the United States anxious, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced late last week the termination of automatic extensions for employment authorization documents (EADs). This change affects most noncitizens who must file timely renewal applications to maintain their employment status in the country.

Under the new rule, noncitizens seeking to renew their EADs will no longer receive an automatic extension of their employment authorization or EAD validity while their renewal applications are being processed by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). DHS claims that this policy aims to improve screening and vetting processes to reassess an individual’s eligibility before extending their work authorization. However, experts argue that the ruling poses significant financial risks to individuals and could adversely impact the U.S. economy.

Immigration attorney Emily Neumann expressed her concerns, stating, “If proper vetting was actually the issue, why has USCIS been waiting until people renew their EADs to complete a screening? USCIS can review an alien’s background at any point. This just harms the people who are actually following the law and are not a security threat.”

The abrupt implementation of this rule, with only a 24-hour notice, has already begun to affect individuals on the ground. Mani S., a software professional on an H-4 EAD, shared her distress: “Both my H-4 and EAD extensions are filed. I received the receipt in September, a month before this ruling came in. But I am confused; even though I applied for an extension before the ruling date, my EAD has already expired. Does this mean I cannot work? I have been trying to seek opinions from legal experts, and I am told that I need to wait to get a new EAD card before I can start working. This means that one fine day I woke up to joblessness.”

Statistics indicate that a significant number of H-4 EAD holders are Indian women, who are directly impacted by this ruling. While some may overlook the contributions of immigrants to the American economy, immigration consultant Netra Chavan emphasizes the vital roles H-4 EAD holders play. “H-4 EAD holders are often more than just contributors to the workforce; many are passionate professionals dedicated to making a real difference. They can be self-employed, creating jobs, or serve their local community, filling essential gaps in America’s job market, like special needs teachers. Very often, they also drive scientific discoveries, advance technology in IT, and serve in countless other vital roles. Losing their ability to work abruptly wouldn’t just affect their careers; it would challenge employers to find similar replacements.”

As a result of this swift rule change, thousands of H-4 EAD holders are now left scrambling for clarity regarding their next steps. For those who require extensions in the near future, the specter of forced unemployment looms large. Srija K., who works in the tech sector, expressed her confusion: “The rule left me wondering, as my EAD is valid until May 2026, but my I-94 is valid until a later date. Does that mean I stop working once my EAD expires or my I-94? I quickly booked an online consultation with an attorney, and I was told that I can only work until my EAD expiration date. This means I need to plan now, because I may lose my ability to work next year. I hope it’s temporary, but with increased paperwork for the employer too, the situation becomes very precarious. Will they be willing to hold the work until their employee navigates the changing rules?”

DHS implemented this interim final rule without prior notice, public comment, or a delayed effective date, citing urgent national security and public safety reasons. The agency stated that immediate implementation is necessary to enhance the vetting and screening of foreign nationals and that the rule relates to immigration policy affecting foreign affairs. Consequently, DHS waived the usual 30-day waiting period, making the rule effective immediately.

For H-4 EAD holders who need an extension, Chavan advises, “As per USCIS’s ‘Check Case Processing Times,’ currently, for H-4 applicants filing with an EAD, 80% of cases are completed within four months. This applies to both the Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status (Form I-539) at Service Center Operations (SCOPS) and to the Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765) filed alone, indicating relatively swift processing for the majority of applicants.”

She adds, “If an H-4 applicant files their H-4 extension and/or EAD renewal up to 180 days before the current status or EAD expires, they are already taking the recommended steps to avoid any employment gaps. In that case, the new DHS rule ending automatic extensions starting October 30, 2025, should not directly affect them, because their work authorization will continue as long as USCIS adjudicates the timely-filed applications while maintaining valid underlying status.”

However, complications arise if USCIS processing times extend beyond the expiration of the EAD for H-4 holders, potentially leading to unintended employment gaps. Chavan notes, “In such cases, applicants may need to challenge the ended rule in court or seek administrative relief, presenting themselves as impacted parties to argue for reinstatement of automatic extensions or other remedies to protect their ability to work legally.”

Source: Original article

Over 100,000 South Asian Families Face Job Loss After EAD Changes

More than 100,000 South Asian families face potential job loss as the Department of Homeland Security eliminates the 540-day automatic extension for Employment Authorization Documents (EAD).

On Thursday, a significant change in immigration policy was announced that has left many South Asian families in distress. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has officially removed the 540-day automatic extension for Employment Authorization Documents (EAD), a lifeline that many had relied upon to maintain their employment status while waiting for renewals.

This decision, effective October 30, 2025, means that any EAD renewal filed on or after this date will not receive any grace period. As a result, if an individual’s EAD card expires, their job is at risk, along with their family’s financial stability and future plans.

The 540-day extension was initially introduced to alleviate the burden on legal workers, particularly those from South Asian countries such as India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka, as well as others from around the world. This policy was championed by advocates who aimed to “Save 1 Million Families” by extending the auto-renewal period from 180 to 540 days. The extension was signed into law on May 3, 2022, and had provided crucial support to approximately 1.2 million legal workers while the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) processed their applications.

However, the recent decision by the DHS has left many individuals anxious about their futures. A software engineer from Hyderabad, a nurse from Kerala, a data scientist from Colombo, and an ERP developer from Dhaka have all reached out with the same urgent concern: “If USCIS takes eight months to process my renewal, will I lose my job, my health insurance, and my child’s school?” The unfortunate answer is yes, unless they filed their renewal before the October 30 deadline.

Among those affected are over 100,000 Indian H-4 spouses, recent OPT STEM graduates from prestigious institutions, and Nepali TPS nurses who played a vital role in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of this policy change is not just theoretical; it translates into real financial losses for families. For instance, if a card expires on March 1, 2026, and an application is filed on November 3, 2025, the average processing time of 7.5 months could result in a gap of 106 days without income, amounting to a staggering loss of nearly $30,000 for a single family. When multiplied across 100,000 households, this could mean a total economic impact of approximately $3 billion.

The implications of this policy change extend beyond immediate job loss. Families may face severe financial strain as mortgages stall, children may have to switch schools, and remittances to aging parents in their home countries could dry up. Additionally, many individuals may find their driver’s licenses expiring, as these are often tied to EAD status in 17 states. Employment gaps could also jeopardize green card applications, leading to potential denials based on “public charge” criteria.

In light of these challenges, advocates are urging affected individuals to take immediate action. They recommend filing the I-765 application online as soon as possible, as waiting until the previous timeline of 180 days early is no longer sufficient. Individuals are encouraged to document their application receipt and communicate with their employers about potential unpaid leave. Financial planning is also critical, with suggestions to save at least three months’ worth of expenses in a separate account designated for EAD gaps.

Despite the grim outlook, there remains a thread of hope. The USCIS still has 22,000 unused H-1B visas available this year, and there are bipartisan efforts in Congress to address the backlog of applications. Community support continues to be a vital resource, with many South Asian volunteers coming together to provide assistance and solidarity during these trying times.

As families navigate this new reality, it is crucial to remain proactive and connected. The immigrant community has historically shown resilience in the face of adversity, and this situation is no different. By filing early, planning carefully, and leaning on community networks, families can work to protect their futures one renewal at a time.

Source: Original article

India Introduces AI Governance Guidelines for Responsible Innovation

India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has introduced new AI Governance Guidelines aimed at fostering innovation while ensuring responsible use of artificial intelligence.

On November 5, 2025, India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) unveiled a set of new AI Governance Guidelines designed to promote a hands-off regulatory model for artificial intelligence. This updated framework marks a shift from earlier drafts that primarily focused on minimizing risks associated with AI technologies. Instead, the revised guidelines emphasize the importance of fostering innovation through balanced guardrails that do not impede the adoption of AI.

Under the leadership of Balaraman Ravindran from IIT Madras, these guidelines were developed following the establishment of a committee in July. They outline seven key principles that will guide the governance of AI: trust, people-centricity, responsible innovation, equity, accountability, understandability of large language models (LLMs), and safety, resilience, and sustainability.

This approach reflects India’s commitment to enabling widespread integration of AI across various industries while ensuring its ethical and responsible use. Abhishek Singh, Additional Secretary at MeitY, emphasized that the guidelines aim to set a global benchmark for AI governance. The framework includes recommendations to expand access to AI infrastructure, leverage digital public infrastructure for scalability and inclusion, and enhance AI capacity through education and skill development programs.

Moreover, the guidelines advocate for agile and balanced regulatory measures tailored to address India-specific risks, while promoting transparency and accountability throughout the AI ecosystem. This comprehensive strategy aims to create an environment conducive to innovation while safeguarding public interests.

The guidelines propose a phased implementation strategy, which includes short-term goals to establish governance institutions and enhance the availability of AI safety tools. Medium-term actions focus on updating existing laws, operationalizing AI incident management for cybersecurity, and integrating AI with digital infrastructure such as Aadhaar. Long-term plans involve drafting new legislation that is responsive to the evolving capabilities and risks associated with AI technologies.

IT Secretary S. Krishnan noted that while there are currently no immediate plans for an AI-specific law, the government is prepared to take swift action should the need arise. This proactive stance underscores the government’s commitment to ensuring that AI development aligns with the nation’s interests and ethical standards.

Launched in anticipation of the Delhi AI Impact Summit scheduled for February 2026, this framework aims to position India as a leading hub for responsible AI innovation. It seeks to balance growth with necessary safeguards that protect individuals and society as a whole. The holistic governance architecture includes key bodies such as the AI Governance Group, the Technology and Policy Expert Committee, and the AI Safety Institute, which will ensure a coordinated government approach for effective oversight and continuous improvement.

The introduction of these guidelines represents a significant step forward in India’s journey toward harnessing the potential of AI while maintaining a strong commitment to ethical standards and responsible practices. By establishing a clear framework for AI governance, India aims to encourage innovation while safeguarding the interests of its citizens and society.

Source: Original article

Enforcement Directorate Seizes Anil Ambani Group Properties Worth Over Rs 3,000 Crore

The Enforcement Directorate has provisionally attached over 40 properties linked to the Anil Ambani-led Reliance Group, with a total value exceeding Rs 3,000 crore.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has taken significant action against the Anil Ambani-led Reliance Group by provisionally attaching more than 40 properties, including the well-known Pali Hill residence in Mumbai. The total estimated value of these assets exceeds Rs 3,000 crore.

These properties are located in several major cities across India, including Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Mumbai, Pune, Thane, Hyderabad, Chennai, Kancheepuram, and East Godavari. The attached assets comprise a diverse mix of office spaces, residential units, and land parcels, amounting to approximately Rs 3,084 crore.

This enforcement action is part of a broader investigation into allegations of money laundering and the diversion of public funds raised by Reliance Home Finance Ltd (RHFL) and Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd (RCFL). Between 2017 and 2019, Yes Bank invested nearly Rs 5,000 crore into these companies, which subsequently became non-performing assets, resulting in dues exceeding Rs 3,300 crore.

The investigation has unveiled a complex mechanism allegedly designed to bypass regulatory norms. It was discovered that public funds invested in the former Reliance Nippon Mutual Fund were funneled through Yes Bank to various Anil Ambani Group firms. This maneuver sidestepped the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (SEBI) conflict-of-interest regulations, which prohibit mutual funds from investing directly in affiliated companies.

As part of its financial investigation, the ED has identified serious lapses in the loan processing procedures of these companies. Findings indicate that loans were processed rapidly without adhering to standard checks, with disbursements occurring before formal approvals. Additionally, many loan applications were found to be incomplete, with critical fields left blank, overwritten, or undated, highlighting systematic failures in control mechanisms.

The ED has also intensified its scrutiny of the Reliance Communications Ltd (RCOM) loan fraud case, where it is alleged that over Rs 13,600 crore have been diverted. The agency continues to trace the proceeds of these crimes and is actively pursuing asset recovery efforts aimed at benefiting the public.

According to Global Net News, the ED’s actions reflect a significant escalation in its efforts to address financial irregularities associated with the Reliance Group.

Source: Original article

Congressional Leaders, Including Ami Bera, Call for Reconsideration of H-1B Restrictions

U.S. lawmakers, including Representative Ami Bera, are urging President Trump to reconsider recent restrictions on H-1B visas, citing potential negative impacts on the economy and U.S.-India relations.

In a recent letter to President Donald Trump, U.S. Representative Jimmy Panetta, along with Congressmen Ami Bera, Salud Carbajal, Derek Tran, and Congresswoman Julie Johnson, has called for the reversal of the September 19 Proclamation that limits H-1B visas. The bipartisan group of lawmakers expressed concern that these restrictions could adversely affect the relationship between the United States and India, as well as diminish America’s competitive advantage in technology and innovation.

Representative Ami Bera, a senior Indian American member of Congress and a long-time proponent of stronger ties between the U.S. and India, underscored the importance of H-1B professionals in bolstering the U.S. technology sector. “Our economy thrives on global talent and innovation,” Bera stated. He cautioned that restrictive visa policies could jeopardize both American leadership in the tech industry and the partnership with India.

Panetta shared similar sentiments, describing the H-1B program as essential for maintaining America’s leadership in technological innovation, particularly in light of the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence. He noted that nearly 75 percent of current H-1B recipients originate from India and urged the administration to expand the program rather than restrict it to foster continued growth in high-tech industries.

The lawmakers highlighted that many of the most successful companies in America were founded or led by individuals who were once H-1B visa holders. These entrepreneurs continue to contribute to job creation and economic development across the country. They argued that limiting visa availability would negatively impact local economies, particularly in areas with significant Indian American and immigrant populations that play a vital role in civic and economic life.

This appeal comes in the wake of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’s recent decision to prohibit H-1B hiring at state universities, as well as new guidance from the Department of Homeland Security regarding application fee adjustments. Despite these developments, the White House has reiterated that President Trump’s priority remains “putting American workers first.” This stance continues amid ongoing legal challenges from business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, regarding the visa restrictions.

As the debate over H-1B visa policies unfolds, the implications for the tech industry and U.S.-India relations remain a focal point for lawmakers advocating for a more inclusive approach to immigration that supports innovation and economic growth.

Source: Original article

US Government Shutdown Halts H-1B Visa Filings, Impacting Indian Applicants

As the U.S. government shutdown continues, thousands of overseas technology professionals, particularly from India, are facing significant disruptions in H-1B visa processes and job security.

The ongoing U.S. government shutdown, now in its fifth week, has left thousands of overseas technology professionals grappling with uncertainty over stalled visa processes and potential job disruptions. Many of those affected are Indian nationals, who comprise over 70% of all H-1B visa holders in the United States.

With key federal departments unable to process Labour Condition Applications (LCAs)—the first step in H-1B filings—immigration attorneys are warning that the shutdown has effectively frozen both visa renewals and new petitions. This situation has deepened anxiety for skilled workers and their employers alike.

“Labor Condition Application (LCA) processing has stopped, forcing clients to halt H-1B filings,” said Matthew Minor, a partner at Corporate Immigration Partners based in Cincinnati. The LCA is a required certification from the Department of Labor (DOL) that employers must complete before hiring foreign professionals under H-1B, H-1B1, or E-3 categories.

With the DOL’s operations stalled, even routine applications are at a standstill. “This effectively halts all H-1B filings—new, change of employer, extension, or amendment,” noted Helene Dang, a Houston-based immigration lawyer and partner at Foster LLP. The disruption has left both companies and workers in a state of limbo.

The impact of the shutdown is particularly severe for Indian nationals, who are facing stalled career moves, delayed project starts, and growing anxiety over maintaining lawful status while their paperwork remains stuck in the system. “The problems facing H-1B workers from India are the same, regardless of which state they work in—petitions cannot be filed now because the shutdown has prevented LCAs from being processed,” explained Richard T. Herman, an immigration attorney based in Cleveland.

The shutdown has also disrupted the DOL’s core responsibilities, including certifying LCAs and determining prevailing wages—both essential steps for H-1B visa processing and employment-based green card applications. While the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) continues to operate, employers cannot proceed with filings until their LCAs are approved by the DOL.

According to Dang, the USCIS notice allowing for flexibility in late or incomplete filings under “extraordinary circumstances” offers limited comfort. “It is discretionary—meaning it is not guaranteed,” she said, emphasizing that employers and workers remain at the mercy of unpredictable timelines.

In the current climate, where Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been actively enforcing removal powers, relying on this exception is causing significant anxiety for many H-1B workers. They are faced with the difficult choice of either departing the United States or overstaying their authorized period of stay, as noted by Becki Young, founding partner of Grossman Young & Hammond.

The ramifications of the shutdown extend beyond visa paperwork, impacting both livelihoods and business operations. “Moreover, these workers must be removed from payroll until a new H-1B petition can be filed, which disrupts U.S. business and leaves the workers without a paycheck while the shutdown is ongoing,” Young added.

Herman cautioned that the effects of the shutdown may linger well beyond the immediate crisis. “I am hearing of more companies deciding to cease immigration sponsorship in the future—whether H-1B or green card,” he said, noting that the uncertainty has made many employers hesitant to rely on foreign talent amid ongoing policy disruptions.

As the uncertainty deepens, some affected professionals are exploring alternative immigration pathways. Clients are considering options such as the EB-5 investor or EB-1C categories, according to Herman. “Some are also looking at Canada and other countries,” he added.

Unlike the H-1B, which is a temporary visa for specialized workers, the EB-5 program offers a path to permanent residency for investors who create jobs in the U.S. Similarly, the EB-1C visa allows multinational companies to transfer senior executives or managers to their U.S. operations—options that are increasingly appealing amid the ongoing freeze.

The federal shutdown, which began on October 1 after lawmakers failed to reach a funding agreement, has also stalled progress for employment-based green card applicants who depend on the DOL for crucial certifications. Geetha N. Adinata, an immigration attorney based in Los Angeles, warned that the resulting delays could cause serious setbacks for those nearing the end of their visa validity. Without timely submission of the labor market test, known as the PERM application, workers risk falling out of status.

As the situation continues to evolve, the future remains uncertain for many skilled workers navigating the complexities of U.S. immigration policy.

Source: Original article

Viral Energy Booster Sparks Division Among Doctors: What to Know

Experts weigh in on CoQ10 supplements, highlighting their potential benefits for energy and heart health while cautioning against misconceptions and emphasizing the importance of medical guidance.

Coenzyme Q10, commonly referred to as CoQ10, has gained popularity as a supplement believed to enhance energy levels and support heart health. However, the actual benefits may not align with the high expectations many have for this compound.

CoQ10 is a natural substance found in every cell of the body, where it plays a crucial role in converting food into usable energy. Additionally, it functions as an antioxidant, protecting cells from damage caused by daily wear and tear. As people age, CoQ10 levels tend to decline, and certain medications may further reduce these levels. Consequently, many individuals turn to CoQ10 supplements, which are often marketed for various health benefits, including heart health, energy enhancement, muscle recovery, and even cognitive protection.

Before adding CoQ10 to your health regimen, it is essential to consider the insights provided by cardiologists and health experts. According to the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), while CoQ10 is important for bodily functions, the clinical evidence supporting its ability to prevent or treat diseases remains inconclusive. Some studies indicate that CoQ10 may help lower blood pressure slightly or alleviate fatigue associated with cholesterol-lowering medications. However, large-scale, well-designed trials have yet to confirm significant benefits for conditions such as Parkinson’s disease or heart disease.

Despite the uncertainty surrounding its effectiveness, experts generally agree that CoQ10 is safe for most individuals. The primary side effects reported are mild, including upset stomach and insomnia. However, the NCCIH warns that CoQ10 can interact with certain medications, particularly blood thinners and insulin, necessitating caution.

Cardiologists express interest in CoQ10 but remain cautious. A 2022 press release from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) identified CoQ10 as one of several micronutrients potentially linked to reduced cardiovascular risk and a decrease in all-cause mortality. Nonetheless, the ACC emphasized the need for more high-quality studies before recommending CoQ10 universally.

One of the reasons for caution is that CoQ10 may help relax blood vessels, which can lead to lower-than-expected blood pressure in some individuals. Unlike prescription medications, dietary supplements are not strictly regulated by the FDA, meaning the amount of CoQ10 in each capsule can vary significantly between brands. To ensure quality and purity, it is advisable to choose products that have undergone third-party testing, such as those bearing the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) seal.

CoQ10 is fat-soluble, which means it is best absorbed when taken with a meal containing healthy fats. The National Institutes of Health recommends a daily intake of between 100 mg and 200 mg for most individuals, although it is wise to consult with a healthcare provider to determine the appropriate dosage for your specific needs.

While experts agree that CoQ10 is generally safe and may offer some benefits, they caution against viewing it as a miracle solution. Individuals with heart failure or frequent migraines may experience positive effects from the supplement, but it is crucial to discuss its use with a healthcare professional first.

For those seeking to improve heart health, experts continue to advocate for a comprehensive approach that includes regular exercise, a balanced diet, and care supervised by a medical professional.

Source: Original article

Domestic Violence Among Indian-Americans: Understanding the Dynamics of Control

Domestic violence is a pervasive issue that transcends cultural boundaries, affecting individuals and families across various communities, particularly within South Asian immigrant populations.

“Although I wish I had recognised the abuse earlier, talking to someone openly and honestly about what I have experienced helps me understand that I am not to blame,” shared an anonymous domestic violence survivor.

Domestic violence (DV) occurs when one partner exerts control over the other through physical, emotional, psychological, or sexual abuse. While the abuser may often be perceived as the “bad person,” the reality is that both partners, along with their children, are deeply affected by the dynamics of violence.

At its core, domestic violence violates the fundamental human right to live safely and free from harm. It is the responsibility of individuals and society as a whole to recognize, intervene, and protect this right. Without timely intervention, the psychological and emotional consequences can be devastating, leading to isolation, depression, and long-lasting trauma.

Common assumptions often portray domestic violence as primarily a husband’s abuse of his wife. However, this stereotype fails to capture the full spectrum of the issue. Men can also be silent victims, and abuse can occur in both heterosexual and same-sex relationships. Therefore, it is crucial to assess domestic violence without bias, paying attention to the subtle dynamics at play.

Within the Indian immigrant population in the U.S., domestic violence presents particularly complex challenges. Studies indicate that South Asian women, including Indian immigrants, report alarmingly high rates of domestic violence, with lifetime prevalence as high as 77%. This violence manifests in various forms—physical, emotional, and sexual abuse—while intersecting with cultural, social, and economic realities.

The repercussions of domestic violence extend beyond individual victims, reverberating through families and communities and creating long-lasting hardship. The impact often destabilizes family structures and strains social systems, affecting not only the immediate victims but also those around them.

Perhaps the most concerning aspect is the intergenerational transmission of trauma. Children who witness or grow up in violent households often internalize these patterns, normalizing violence in their own relationships as they mature. This normalization can leave them vulnerable to anxiety, confusion, and difficulties with emotional regulation.

In this way, domestic violence evolves from a personal issue into a societal one, perpetuating cycles of harm across generations. To break this cycle, it is essential to raise awareness through education and community campaigns that highlight both the immediate and long-term societal consequences of domestic violence. Such efforts can foster understanding, reduce stigma, and encourage individuals and families to seek support before patterns of violence become deeply entrenched.

Several factors contribute to the prevalence of domestic violence, particularly within South Asian communities. Traditional gender roles and patriarchal structures often create expectations that women must bear the full burden of domestic and emotional labor, while men position themselves as primary providers. This dynamic can be exacerbated by a “scarcity mindset” carried from India, where financial insecurity looms large, leading to projected fears about unemployment or loss of income onto spouses.

Household dynamics can also shift drastically after immigration. In India, many families rely on domestic help, but in the U.S., couples are expected to manage housework themselves. This expectation can lead to frustration, especially when one partner feels unsupported or unacknowledged.

Financial dependency adds another layer of vulnerability. Among Indian immigrants, it is common for one partner to be on a dependent visa, legally barred from working until granted a permit. This dependency can heighten power imbalances and foster resentment within the marriage.

Acculturation stress further complicates the situation. When one partner has adapted to life in the U.S. while the other is newly arrived, the couple may find themselves caught in conflict, struggling between traditional values and the pressures of Western norms.

Isolation from extended family also plays a significant role. Being far from relatives can leave many without a social safety net, intensifying feelings of loneliness and despair. Unfortunately, stigma and shame surrounding therapy often prevent couples from addressing these issues in a timely manner.

A clinical example illustrates the profound impact of domestic violence on children. During a counseling placement at an elementary school, a second grader named Jay (name changed for privacy) began acting out in disruptive and aggressive ways. His teacher described him as loud and uncontrollable, often physically aggressive toward peers.

Initially, Jay presented as cheerful during sessions, but through play therapy, he began to reveal more about his inner world. Using figurines, he reenacted scenes of conflict between a couple, sharing that he could hear his parents fighting at home. Although his parents believed they were arguing quietly, Jay was still able to perceive the tension and hostility, leaving him confused about his perceptions. His bottled-up frustration and helplessness surfaced in his behavior at school.

When this issue was addressed collaboratively with his parents and teacher, Jay’s classroom behavior improved, and his parents sought couples therapy to enhance their communication. This case serves as a vivid reminder that children, even when not directly targeted, absorb the emotional violence around them and often carry it into their own relationships.

Domestic violence is not merely a private matter between partners; it is a cultural and intergenerational issue that requires careful, culturally sensitive intervention. Within South Asian immigrant communities, therapists and professionals must recognize the unique stressors of immigration, financial dependency, and acculturation while validating the universal right of every individual to safety and respect.

Domestic violence should be reframed not as a matter of shame but as an urgent social and psychological concern. Seeking help is both necessary and courageous. Addressing domestic violence openly can prevent the silent transmission of trauma across generations and pave the way toward healthier, more respectful relationships.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Couples Celebrate Timeless Love Across Generations

Many individuals grapple with the belief that romance has an expiration date, but love can flourish at any stage of life, as explored in Monica Saigal’s novel, A Kiss in Kashmir.

“Is it too late for me?” This question often echoes in the hearts of many, especially those who have experienced divorce or widowhood. As a matchmaker and relationship coach working with Indian men and women aged 20 to over 70, I frequently encounter this quiet yet persistent worry. However, my experience has shown me that love is indeed attainable at any stage of life.

This belief inspired me to connect with author Monica Saigal about her novel, A Kiss in Kashmir. Her book has ignited conversations across generations about love later in life, the myths we grow up with, the influence of family on our choices, and the courage required to embrace joy once again.

In our discussion, I asked Saigal what motivated her to write A Kiss in Kashmir.

“I grew up on Bollywood, and I still love it,” she shared. “But it instilled in me the belief that there’s only one soulmate. If you lose that person, your story is over. After my own divorce following 23 years of marriage, I was nearly fifty and heard that same message: ‘It’s over for you now. Dedicate yourself to God. Focus only on your children.’ This notion felt wrong to me. I wanted to craft a story that breaks that myth—that love can arrive at any age, and we have the right to define what that looks like for ourselves.”

When I asked her why a romance between older adults was significant, she responded, “Because it’s real. Life doesn’t stop at forty or fifty. Yet literature and pop culture often suggest that it does. During my grief, I sought stories that demonstrated there’s always room for second chances—that being widowed or divorced doesn’t mean love is off the table. I wanted to provide readers with a reflection of hope, showing that beauty, passion, and companionship can begin anew.”

Saigal noted that readers have indeed connected with the theme of second chances. “At book clubs, many older readers expressed how much they needed to hear this message. Some admitted they were in love again but felt guilty about it. Others feared their adult children wouldn’t support them. The biggest surprise? In many cases, the children actually wanted their parents to be happy. They encouraged, ‘Go for it.’ This has been both moving and healing for me as a mother of two grown boys who urged me to start dating again.”

When I inquired about the message she hopes readers take away from A Kiss in Kashmir, Saigal emphasized, “That love is not a one-time lottery ticket. It doesn’t expire. The real lesson is that it should be our choice—whether we want to be single, married, partnered, or not. No one else gets to write the ending of our story. Life will throw us curveballs—mine certainly did—but we get to decide how to catch them.”

Reflecting on her own journey, Saigal shared, “I never imagined I’d be divorced. I never thought I’d be starting over. But here I am. Instead of letting that break me, I turned grief into love—not just romantic love, but love for life itself. That’s the heart of A Kiss in Kashmir: resilience, hope, and the spark that propels us forward.”

For those who may feel guilty about wanting romance after a long marriage or widowhood, Saigal advises, “You don’t have to apologize for wanting love. I’ve met many people who confided in me that they were dating again or secretly in love but carried guilt as if finding happiness a second time was shameful. That’s simply not true. Love is not a betrayal of the past; it’s a celebration of being alive. You can honor your history and still open yourself to new chapters.”

When asked what advice she would give to someone who believes they are “too old” for love, Saigal asserted, “Love has no expiration date. It doesn’t end at forty or fifty, or after a divorce, or after widowhood. If you desire romance, companionship, or simply the joy of possibility, you have every right to pursue it. Don’t let society’s timeline dictate your heart’s timeline. It’s never too late to feel alive again.”

Monica Saigal’s insights serve as a powerful reminder that love is not constrained by age, history, or circumstance. Whether we are in our thirties or seventies, divorced, widowed, or never married, the desire for connection is a fundamental aspect of being human—and the potential for it never fades. What I admire about A Kiss in Kashmir is how it normalizes the hopes many harbor quietly: that new beginnings can be just as profound as first ones.

As someone who helps individuals navigate these journeys daily, I can confidently say—your story isn’t finished until you decide it is.

Source: Original article

Kim Kardashian’s Health Scare: Doctors Warn of Aneurysm Symptoms

Kim Kardashian recently revealed that a brain aneurysm was discovered during an MRI scan, prompting experts to discuss the condition’s causes, symptoms, and treatment options.

Kim Kardashian has opened up about a recent health scare involving a brain aneurysm. The 45-year-old Skims founder shared the news in a preview clip for Season 7 of Hulu’s “The Kardashians,” where she informed her family, “There was a little aneurysm.” While the exact cause of the aneurysm remains unidentified, Kardashian’s doctors have suggested that stress may be a contributing factor.

A brain aneurysm occurs when a blood vessel in the brain balloons, which can lead to leakage or rupture, resulting in bleeding. According to the Mayo Clinic, this condition can be serious and potentially life-threatening. Dr. Adam Arthur, chairman of neurosurgery at the University of Tennessee, explained that an aneurysm represents a weakness in the wall of an artery, likening it to a small water balloon forming off a hose. If an aneurysm ruptures, it can lead to a hemorrhagic stroke, which can have devastating consequences.

Dr. Arthur noted that while most aneurysms are small and do not pose a significant risk if they remain unruptured, they are more prevalent in women. He indicated that genetics may play a role in this disparity, stating, “There’s so much about the brain and about genetics that we don’t understand.” It is estimated that aneurysms are present in approximately one in every 50 individuals, and many do not require treatment.

When an aneurysm becomes problematic, it can cause a sudden stroke, often characterized by what patients describe as “the worst headache of their life.” Dr. Arthur elaborated on this symptom, describing it as a “very abnormal headache, often behind the eye.” He expressed relief that Kardashian’s aneurysm was discovered before it could lead to a stroke, calling it “a blessing.”

Several factors can increase the likelihood of aneurysm formation. These include binge drinking, exposure to nicotine, certain genetic conditions, and the use of drugs such as cocaine and methamphetamine. Dr. Arthur emphasized that drugs and nicotine can adversely affect blood vessel health, contributing to aneurysm growth and rupture. Chronic stress has also been linked to the condition, highlighting the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle that includes adequate sleep, a balanced diet, and regular exercise.

Understanding family history is crucial when it comes to aneurysms. Dr. Arthur recommends that individuals with two close relatives who have experienced aneurysms should consider undergoing screening exams, such as MRIs.

While some aneurysms can lead to sudden fatal strokes, those experiencing symptoms—particularly intense headaches—should seek medical attention to explore treatment options. If an aneurysm is detected before it ruptures, minimally invasive surgery may be performed to prevent a stroke. Alternatively, open surgery can be conducted, where a surgeon can pinch the aneurysm shut through an incision along the hairline.

For older patients with smaller aneurysms, monitoring by a physician is often the preferred approach to ensure that the aneurysm does not grow or cause further complications. “We do have ways of fixing aneurysms now that are pretty remarkable,” Dr. Arthur stated. He explained that medical professionals can place a metal mesh over the opening of the aneurysm or fill it with a device, allowing the body to form a clot and scar tissue over time.

Stroke remains the leading cause of disability in the United States, with Dr. Arthur noting that it “disables way more people than it outright kills.” This underscores the importance of awareness and early detection of brain aneurysms.

Fox News Digital’s Christina Dugan Ramirez contributed to this report. Fox News Digital reached out to Kardashian for comment.

Source: Original article

Paul Kapur Sworn In as Indian-American Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asia

Paul Kapur has been sworn in as the Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs, marking a significant appointment within the Biden administration.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Indian-American security expert Paul Kapur has officially been sworn in as the Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs. This appointment is seen as a pivotal move for the Biden administration regarding its focus on the region.

The State Department’s Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs announced Kapur’s swearing-in on October 22 via a post on X, stating, “Welcome to @State_SCA, Assistant Secretary Paul Kapur! This morning Dr. Kapur was officially sworn in as the Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs.”

Kapur takes over the role from Donald Lu, who served as Assistant Secretary from September 2021 until January 2025. His extensive background includes a tenure on the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff from 2020 to 2021, where he focused on issues pertinent to South and Central Asia, the Indo-Pacific strategy, and India-U.S. relations.

In addition to his government service, Kapur is a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution and a professor at the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. His academic and professional experiences have positioned him as a key figure in U.S. diplomatic efforts in the region.

Kapur was confirmed by the Senate in early October, alongside the new U.S. Ambassador to India, Sergio Gor. During his Senate confirmation hearing in June, he expressed a sense of personal fulfillment in his new role, stating, “My career has come full circle,” reflecting on his academic studies of the region and his current diplomatic responsibilities.

Born in New Delhi to an Indian father and an American mother, Kapur shared his unique perspective on his upbringing. “Although I visited India often during my childhood, I grew up in the United States as a thoroughly American kid, never imagining that my career would someday return me to the place where I was born,” he remarked.

On the topic of U.S.-India relations, Kapur emphasized the shared interests between the two nations. “The United States and India share a host of common interests: ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific region, which is not dominated by China; expanding bilateral trade; building our economic relationship so that it is more symmetrical and profitable; facilitating technology sharing and innovation; and ensuring access to the energy necessary to fuel our economies,” he noted.

Regarding Pakistan, he indicated a willingness to engage in security cooperation when it aligns with U.S. interests. His approach reflects the bureau’s critical role in shaping U.S. policy on security, economic engagement, counterterrorism, and infrastructure development across the broader South and Central Asia region.

Kapur’s appointment is expected to influence U.S. strategies and relationships in South and Central Asia, particularly as the region continues to evolve in the context of global geopolitical dynamics.

Source: Original article

Salesforce Proposes Streamlined Hiring Process for Immigration Officers at ICE

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff faces criticism after proposing the use of the company’s AI technology to assist ICE in recruiting immigration officers and enhancing deportation efforts.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff is under fire following reports that he proposed leveraging the company’s artificial intelligence technology to support the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in its recruitment and deportation initiatives.

Internal documents obtained by The New York Times reveal that Benioff suggested using Salesforce’s AI capabilities to help ICE recruit 10,000 new agents and streamline the agency’s deportation processes. The materials included a five-page memo, a spreadsheet outlining potential opportunities with ICE, and slides detailing how AI could assist in processing tip-line reports and investigations. Salesforce confirmed the authenticity of these documents but refrained from providing detailed comments, citing the confidential nature of its contracts.

This revelation is likely to provoke further controversy among San Francisco’s liberal community, which has already expressed discontent with Benioff’s previous comments advocating for the deployment of the National Guard to address crime, drug issues, and homelessness in the city.

At this week’s Dreamforce conference, which concluded Thursday at the Moscone Center with nearly 50,000 attendees, Benioff did not address questions regarding his comments on ICE or the National Guard. His earlier endorsement of using National Guard troops to enhance public safety had already drawn criticism prior to the conference.

During a session at Dreamforce, Benioff emphasized the importance of safety, stating, “The number one thing that’s on my mind is safety. It’s all about trust and safety — it’s our highest value here.”

The U.S. government is Salesforce’s largest client, with various agencies, including the Army, Coast Guard, and Veterans Affairs, utilizing the company’s products. While Salesforce has previously collaborated with ICE under both the Obama and Biden administrations, its recent proposal to assist in scaling up enforcement operations marks a significant shift in its approach.

Benioff has positioned himself as a strong supporter of San Francisco, pledging billions to the city, including a commitment of $15 billion over the next five years. On Thursday, he also announced a $1 million donation to the San Francisco Police Department.

Salesforce’s involvement with ICE is not an isolated case among Bay Area tech firms. Recently, the White House hosted a summit with executives from OpenAI, Google, Oracle, Apple, and Meta to discuss potential collaborations on artificial intelligence and other federal technology initiatives.

The actions of Salesforce and other tech giants in Silicon Valley highlight the growing intersection between technology companies and federal policymaking. As discussions around public safety, AI regulation, and federal partnerships intensify, these engagements illustrate how influential tech leaders are shaping national priorities while navigating scrutiny and opportunities in the political landscape.

Source: Original article

Rishi Sunak Expresses Love for Indian Sweets at NDTV World Summit

Former UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak expressed his love for Indian sweets during the NDTV World Summit 2025, sharing personal anecdotes about his Diwali celebrations and family values.

At the NDTV World Summit 2025 held in New Delhi, former UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak shared his deep affection for Indian sweets, particularly during the festive occasion of Diwali. His remarks highlighted the cultural significance of these treats in his life and celebrations.

Sunak revealed that his Diwali shopping tradition begins at Khan Market, a popular destination known for its array of traditional sweets. He fondly recalled, “For me, Diwali shopping is mithai first,” underscoring the central role that sweets play in his festive experiences.

During his visit to the Bengali Sweet Market, Sunak indulged in fresh kulfi, a popular frozen dessert, and also selected jalebi and barfi to take home to his family. He expressed his enthusiasm for these traditional treats, noting that he had packed them carefully for his return journey, eager to share them with loved ones.

Beyond his culinary experiences, Sunak also reflected on the influence of his in-laws on his personal values and character. He spoke about the lessons he has learned from his father-in-law, Narayana Murthy, emphasizing the importance of respect, and from his mother-in-law, Sudha Murthy, highlighting the value of compassion. These qualities, he noted, are also reflected in his wife, Akshata Murthy.

Sunak’s heartfelt comments during the summit not only showcased his fondness for Indian sweets but also provided insight into the cultural values that shape his identity and family life.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Tech Leaders Navigate H-1B Visa Changes Under Trump Administration

Several prominent Indian-origin tech leaders have navigated the H-1B visa landscape, influencing the U.S. tech industry amid proposed reforms by the Trump administration.

Several prominent Indian-origin tech leaders, including Satya Nadella, Sundar Pichai, Aravind Srinivas, Jayshree Ullal, and Arvind Krishna, began their careers in the United States on H-1B visas. These individuals have played pivotal roles in shaping the tech industry, with companies like Microsoft, Google, Perplexity AI, Arista Networks, and IBM benefiting from their leadership.

However, recent policy changes proposed by the Trump administration, such as a $100,000 fee for H-1B visa petitions and stricter eligibility criteria, have raised concerns among the tech community. These reforms could significantly impact the hiring practices of tech companies that rely on skilled foreign talent.

In response, several tech leaders have expressed their opposition to the proposed changes. Sundar Pichai has emphasized the importance of immigration in driving innovation and economic success in the U.S. Similarly, Arvind Krishna has advocated for policies that attract global talent to maintain the country’s competitive edge.

The ongoing debate highlights the critical role of immigration in the growth and sustainability of the tech industry, underscoring the need for balanced policies that support both national interests and the contributions of skilled immigrants. The voices of these leaders reflect a broader concern within the industry about maintaining an environment conducive to innovation and progress.

As the discussion continues, the implications of these proposed reforms remain to be seen. The tech industry, which has thrived on the contributions of diverse talent, faces a pivotal moment in its evolution. The outcome of this debate could shape the future landscape of technology in the United States.

Source: Original article

Supreme Court Upholds Work Rights for H-1B Spouses of Indian-Americans

The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld work rights for certain spouses of H-1B visa holders by declining to review a challenge to a federal rule, affirming a previous appellate ruling.

In a significant legal development, the U.S. Supreme Court has chosen not to review a challenge to a federal rule that allows certain spouses of H-1B visa holders to work in the United States. This decision effectively upholds a 2024 appellate ruling that confirmed the legality of the program.

The case, known as Save Jobs USA v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), was initiated by a group representing American technology workers. They argued that the DHS had overstepped its authority by extending work authorization to holders of H-4 visas, which are granted to the dependents of H-1B skilled workers. By refusing to hear the case, the Supreme Court has left the D.C. Circuit’s decision intact, allowing the rule to remain in effect.

Introduced during the Obama administration in 2015, the rule permits certain H-4 visa holders—typically spouses of H-1B workers who are pursuing permanent residency—to obtain work authorization. Proponents of the policy argue that it promotes family unity and economic stability, while critics contend that it may displace American workers.

This ruling marks the conclusion of nearly a decade of legal challenges surrounding the issue and provides clarity for thousands of families navigating the complexities of the U.S. immigration system. It also highlights the ongoing debate over employment-based immigration policies and their implications for the domestic workforce.

As the landscape of immigration continues to evolve, this decision reinforces the rights of H-4 visa holders and their families, ensuring that they can contribute to the U.S. economy while maintaining their family ties.

Source: Original article

Tech Giants, Including Amazon and Google, Attend White House Dinner

President Donald Trump hosted a White House dinner for nearly 130 influential supporters and corporate leaders, celebrating a significant renovation project and unveiling new initiatives.

On Wednesday evening, President Donald Trump welcomed nearly 130 top donors, corporate allies, and influential supporters to a White House dinner. The event celebrated their commitments to a new, expansive ballroom, which is projected to cost around $250 million.

This ballroom renovation represents the largest undertaking of Trump’s second term, reflecting his background as a real estate developer. A White House official confirmed that representatives from major companies, including Amazon, Apple, Booz Allen Hamilton, Coinbase, Comcast, Google, Lockheed Martin, Meta, and T-Mobile, were in attendance. The Adelson Family Foundation, founded by prominent GOP donors Miriam Adelson and her late husband Sheldon, was also present at the gathering.

Among the notable guests were oil magnate Harold Hamm, Blackstone CEO Steve Schwarzman, Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler and her husband Jeff Sprecher, as well as cryptocurrency entrepreneurs Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, as reported by The Wall Street Journal.

During the dinner, Trump described the ballroom as a space that would feature bulletproof glass on all four sides, grand enough to host a presidential inauguration. He emphasized that the design elements, including window shapes, molding, and color, would align with the historic aesthetic of the White House. “To me, there’s nothing like the White House,” Trump remarked, adding, “It’s just a special place so we have to take care of it.”

The new ballroom is set to occupy the area currently housing the East Wing and will cover an impressive 90,000 square feet. Initially, the White House indicated that the venue would accommodate 650 guests, but Trump announced that it could actually host up to 999 people.

Despite the ambitious plans, the ballroom has not yet received clearance from the National Capital Planning Commission or the Commission of Fine Arts, which typically review federal construction projects. However, White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf, appointed by Trump to lead the planning commission, stated that such approval is not necessary. During the dinner, Trump asserted that as president, he faces no zoning restrictions and can proceed with the project as he deems fit.

In addition to the ballroom announcement, Trump introduced a separate initiative to construct an arch at one end of the Arlington Memorial Bridge, which connects Virginia and Washington, D.C. He showcased three scale models of the proposed arch, which will feature Lady Liberty atop it, noting that the largest model was his preferred design. “It’s going to be really beautiful,” Trump stated.

The presence of major corporations and high-profile tech leaders at the dinner underscores the growing alignment between Trump’s vision and the business community. Their investments and commitments reflect not only financial support but also a shared interest in shaping projects that resonate with the president’s ambitions. This gathering signals a deepening partnership between private enterprise and the initiatives of the Trump administration.

Source: Original article

Canada Warns Stellantis Against Shifting Production to the U.S.

Canada has threatened legal action against Stellantis NV over plans to shift production of a model to a U.S. plant, citing unmet commitments tied to financial support.

Canada is taking a firm stance against automaker Stellantis NV, threatening legal action over what it deems an unacceptable plan to relocate production of one of its models to a facility in the United States. This move has raised concerns about the commitments made by Stellantis in exchange for substantial financial support from the Canadian government.

Stellantis, formed in 2021 through the merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and PSA Group, is recognized as the world’s fourth-largest automaker by volume. The company boasts a diverse portfolio of well-known brands, including Jeep, Ram, Dodge, Peugeot, and Citroën. Stellantis operates extensively across North America, Europe, and other significant markets, offering a wide range of vehicles from passenger cars to trucks and commercial vehicles.

On Wednesday, Canadian Minister of Industry Melanie Joly addressed Stellantis CEO Antonio Filosa in a letter, emphasizing the company’s prior agreement to maintain its Canadian operations. Joly stated, “Anything short of fulfilling that commitment will be considered a default under our agreement.” She further warned that if Stellantis fails to uphold its commitments, Canada would “exercise all options, including legal.”

As of 2025, Stellantis is heavily investing in electrification and innovation, committing billions to develop electric vehicles and battery technologies. The company aims to lead in sustainable mobility by launching new electric platforms and expanding its lineup of hybrid and fully electric models. Stellantis is also adapting to global market challenges, such as supply chain disruptions and shifting consumer preferences.

Recently, Stellantis announced a $13 billion investment in the U.S., which the company claims will introduce five new models to the market. As part of this initiative, production of the Jeep Compass is set to move from a facility in Brampton, Ontario, to a plant in Illinois.

This controversy underscores the challenges Canada faces in securing long-term commitments from global automotive firms in a competitive and evolving industry. As nations vie for electric vehicle investments, Canada is asserting that public funding should translate into stable, local jobs. The resolution of this dispute could influence future investment policies and serve as a critical test case for balancing industrial support with accountability from private-sector partners.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford expressed his disappointment regarding Stellantis’s decision, stating in a social media post that he has communicated directly with the company about the matter.

For Stellantis, this situation presents both opportunities and risks. The company is strategically positioning itself to expand its U.S. operations and cater to the increasing demand for electric and hybrid vehicles. However, it also risks straining its long-standing relationships with Canadian authorities and labor forces, which could complicate future investments and operations in Canada.

Stellantis spokesperson LouAnn Gosselin reassured that the company remains committed to investing in Canada, highlighting plans to add a third shift at a plant in Windsor, Ontario. “Canada is very important to us. We have plans for Brampton and will share them upon further discussions with the Canadian government,” she stated in an email.

This situation also reflects the growing geopolitical and economic pressures on automakers to localize production amid rising protectionism and trade tensions. As countries like the U.S. and Canada compete for electric vehicle manufacturing and related supply chains, companies such as Stellantis must navigate not only market dynamics but also evolving government expectations tied to subsidies and job creation.

For Stellantis, effectively balancing cost-efficiency with political goodwill will be critical in maintaining access to incentives and avoiding reputational damage. For Canada, this dispute highlights the urgent need to establish more binding industrial agreements that ensure long-term economic returns on public investments.

Source: Original article

Global Economies Strained as U.S. Data Flow Halts During Shutdown

The U.S. government shutdown is disrupting vital economic data flows, creating challenges for global economies that rely on this information for trade and monetary policy decisions.

The ongoing U.S. government shutdown is casting a shadow over the global economy, as the flow of critical economic data from the United States has come to a halt. As the world’s largest economy, the U.S. plays a pivotal role in providing data that helps countries like Japan assess trade performance and currency trends. The absence of this information is causing significant challenges for nations around the globe.

Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda expressed concern during a news briefing on October 3, stating, “It’s a serious problem. We hope this gets fixed soon.” His comments highlight the difficulties the Bank of Japan faces in determining the timing of interest rate hikes amid the uncertainty created by the shutdown.

One unnamed Japanese policymaker voiced frustration, remarking, “It’s a joke. (Federal Reserve Chair Jerome) Powell keeps on saying the Fed’s policy is data-dependent, but there’s no data to depend upon.” This sentiment underscores the frustration felt by many economic leaders as they navigate the complexities of policymaking without access to essential data.

This week, finance and economic leaders from around the world are convening in Washington for meetings of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In a context marked by ongoing geopolitical tensions, including a land war in Europe and violence in the Middle East, discussions are likely to be dominated by President Donald Trump’s plans for the global economy, his performance in office, and the implications of the sudden cessation of data from the U.S., which represents a $30 trillion economy accounting for roughly one-fourth of global output.

The IMF’s World Economic Outlook, published on Tuesday, warned that “intensification of political pressure on policy institutions could erode hard-won public confidence in their ability to fulfill their mandates.” It further noted that pressures on institutions responsible for data collection and dissemination could undermine public and market trust in official statistics. This erosion of trust complicates the tasks of central banks and policymakers, increasing the likelihood of policy errors if political interference compromises data quality, reliability, and timeliness.

The impact of the U.S. government shutdown on economic data flow extends far beyond American borders, highlighting the interconnectedness of today’s global economy. Countries around the world depend on timely and reliable economic data from the United States to inform their monetary policies, trade decisions, and financial market strategies. The current disruption creates a climate of uncertainty, complicating decision-making for central banks and governments alike.

This situation not only hampers effective policymaking but also poses a risk to public and market trust in official statistics, which are foundational to economic stability. When the quality and availability of data are compromised, institutions like the Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan find it increasingly challenging to respond accurately to economic conditions, raising the potential for policy missteps.

As the world watches the developments in Washington, the hope remains that the U.S. government will resolve the shutdown soon, restoring the flow of vital economic data and alleviating the pressures faced by global economies.

Source: Original article

Dr. C. Bob Basu Elected President of Major Plastic Surgery Society

Dr. C. Bob Basu has been appointed President of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, aiming to enhance member resources and uphold high standards in patient care.

Dr. C. Bob Basu has officially assumed the role of President of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), the largest global association of board-certified plastic surgeons. His term commenced on October 12 during the Society’s annual scientific meeting held in New Orleans.

Based in Houston, Dr. Basu leads Basu Aesthetics + Plastic Surgery and brings a wealth of surgical experience to his new leadership position, having performed over 18,000 procedures throughout his career. As president of ASPS, he intends to leverage emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, to enhance the services and resources available to the Society’s more than 11,000 members worldwide.

In his inaugural address, Dr. Basu emphasized his commitment to maintaining the highest standards in ethics, patient safety, education, and surgical training. He highlighted the growing interest in cosmetic procedures and urged patients to seek care exclusively from board-certified plastic surgeons to ensure their safety and well-being.

Dr. Basu’s tenure in ASPS leadership spans nearly two decades. He previously served as Vice President of Finance and Treasurer, playing a crucial role in guiding the organization through challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic while achieving record financial performance. His contributions extend to health policy, surgical education, and governance within ASPS.

Dr. Basu holds a bachelor’s degree from Princeton University, as well as both an MD and MPH from Tufts University, and an MBA from Brandeis University. He completed his plastic surgery training at Baylor College of Medicine’s Department of Surgery before establishing his practice and reputation in Houston.

As he embarks on this new chapter, Dr. Basu’s leadership is expected to influence the future of plastic surgery, focusing on innovation and the highest standards of patient care.

Source: Original article

Supreme Court Provides Relief for H-4 EAD Holders Amid Uncertainty

The Supreme Court’s decision to decline a challenge to the H-4 EAD program offers temporary relief to immigrant spouses, yet experts caution that its future remains uncertain amid shifting political landscapes.

The Supreme Court’s recent decision not to hear a challenge against the H-4 work authorization has provided a moment of stability for thousands of immigrant spouses. However, experts warn that the program’s future is still closely tied to the unpredictable nature of political will.

In recent months, the immigration landscape in the United States has been tumultuous, with work visa holders facing significant uncertainty due to abrupt policy changes from the Trump administration. Amid this chaos, a cautious sense of optimism has emerged for H-4 EAD (Employment Authorization Document) holders, who are primarily spouses of H-1B visa holders.

On Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court declined to review a petition filed by Save Jobs USA, which sought to challenge a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. This ruling affirmed that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had the authority to implement the H-4 EAD rule. The news was met with celebrations among H-4 EAD holders, who viewed the decision as a protective measure for their work authorization.

Johnson Myalil, an immigration attorney based in the Washington, D.C., area, expressed cautious optimism about the ruling. “In some ways, it is good news, as it removes the uncertainty of the court invalidating the H-4 employment authorization, which is used by a substantial number of highly educated spouses of H-1B professionals—estimated to be around at least 300,000,” he stated.

Despite the positive implications of the Supreme Court’s decision, experts caution that challenges remain. Nandini Nair, an immigration attorney at A.Y. Strauss, LLC, emphasized the need for caution. “Absolutely not,” she said when asked if the decision alleviates uncertainty for H-4 EAD holders. “While the Supreme Court declined review this time, a different case with a stronger factual or procedural posture could make its way up again. The program is safe for now, but its survival depends on regulatory stability and political will.”

Nair further noted that for the H-4 EAD program to achieve true permanence, it would need to be codified by Congress rather than relying solely on regulation. “But for today, we can breathe a bit easier,” she added.

The history of the H-4 EAD program has been fraught with challenges. Introduced in 2015 during President Barack Obama’s administration, the program faced immediate opposition from Save Jobs USA, which argued that the DHS had overstepped its authority. This led to years of litigation, leaving many H-4 EAD holders in limbo as companies hesitated to hire them amid ongoing uncertainty.

Myalil remains cautious about the program’s future, stating, “We cannot rule out the possibility that immigration restriction advocates in the Trump administration may push for the cancellation of H-4 EAD through the federal rulemaking process.” However, he also pointed out a silver lining: “That process can take several years.”

Critics of the H-4 work authorization often argue that it takes job opportunities away from American workers. Yet, mounting evidence and legal testimony suggest the opposite—that H-4 EAD holders have made significant economic contributions. Nair highlighted that H-4 EAD holders are predominantly women who contribute billions in household income and tax revenue. Many work in high-demand STEM fields, launch startups, open businesses, and even employ U.S. workers.

“H-4 EADs aren’t just about helping immigrant families; they’re about unlocking untapped talent, boosting the U.S. economy, promoting equity, and stabilizing the workforce. This program has actually been a net gain for the United States,” Nair asserted.

Her argument is supported by data. A 2019 analysis by the American Action Forum, utilizing U.S. Census data, estimated that H-4 workers contribute approximately $12.9 billion annually to the U.S. GDP. This figure could rise to between $40 and $41 billion if all eligible spouses were authorized to work. A 2024 report by FWD.us found that removing current H-4 EAD holders from the workforce would shrink annual GDP by $7.5 billion and cut tax revenues by $2 billion across federal, state, and local levels.

Despite these positive contributions, the H-4 EAD program has often been unfairly criticized, similar to the H-1B visa program. This criticism often stems from widespread misconceptions about immigration’s role in the American economy. Nair noted, “They often get a bad rap because of the persistent narrative that H-1B visa holders ‘take American jobs.’ That same mindset spills over to the H-4 EAD program.”

She concluded, “The controversy isn’t really about H-4 spouses at all—it’s about the larger debate over high-skilled immigration.”

Source: Original article

Governor Newsom Vetoes SB509, Indian-American Groups Express Support

Governor Gavin Newsom’s veto of Senate Bill 509 has been welcomed by various Indian American groups, who expressed concerns about potential divisions within California’s diverse communities.

Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed Senate Bill 509 (SB 509) on Sunday, October 12, effectively sparing diverse diasporic communities in California from what critics described as “potential divisions over redundant transnational repression training mandates.”

Authored by Senator Anna Caballero (D-Merced), SB 509 aimed to establish a specialized law enforcement training program designed to help officers recognize and respond to transnational repression. This term refers to the harassment, threats, and intimidation perpetrated by foreign governments against diaspora communities within the United States. The bill was co-authored by Senators Jasmeet Bains (D-35, Bakersfield) and Esmeralda Soria (D-27, Merced).

In a statement accompanying the introduction of SB 509, Caballero noted that authoritarian regimes worldwide are extending their influence into the U.S., targeting immigrant, refugee, and asylum-seeker communities. These governments employ methods such as digital surveillance, social media monitoring, and covert intimidation tactics to silence dissent and suppress free expression, even within U.S. borders.

“Just as law enforcement is trained to identify domestic violence and human trafficking, they must also be prepared to protect communities targeted by foreign governments,” Caballero stated. “SB 509 is about justice, dignity, and ensuring that no one in California lives in fear because of who they are or where they come from. All Californians deserve to feel safe in their homes, workplaces, and neighborhoods.”

California’s diverse communities, particularly ethnic and religious minorities who have fled oppressive regimes, have frequently been targets of abuse. However, local police often lack the training necessary to identify these issues or assist victims effectively. SB 509 received support from both police leaders and immigrant rights organizations, including the California Police Chiefs Association and Immigrant Defense Advocates. The bill proposed that the Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), in consultation with the Commission on Peace Officer Standards, develop training to identify and respond to transnational repression.

Despite its support, SB 509 faced criticism from certain Hindu and Indian American groups, who expressed concerns about legislative overreach and the potential for stigmatization of communities of Indian origin. Ajay Jain Bhutoria, a vocal opponent of the bill, argued that its focus on specific training for local law enforcement duplicated existing federal guidelines from the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. He warned that this could lead to unnecessary profiling and fracture alliances within California’s vibrant South Asian diaspora.

Grassroots organizations such as the Hindu American Foundation (HAF) and the Coalition of Hindus of North America (CoHNA) mobilized against the bill, organizing protests, circulating petitions, and hosting community forums to halt its progress in Sacramento. Despite their efforts, the bill continued to gain traction, highlighting the challenges of opposing bipartisan support without direct access to executive power.

Although the bill passed the state legislature, it was ultimately vetoed by Governor Newsom. In his statement, the Governor explained that the issue would be more effectively addressed through administrative processes in coordination with federal agencies. He emphasized that, in the absence of a consistent federal definition, the bill would limit the state’s flexibility and could lead to future inconsistencies in its implementation.

The veto was met with approval from critics of the bill. Bhutoria remarked, “His veto of SB 509 preserves our harmony, ensuring that we build bridges rather than barriers among diaspora communities.”

Source: Original article

Connecticut Congressman Jim Himes Backs GOPIO-CT on H-1B Visa Fees

Connecticut Congressman Jim Himes recently met with GOPIO-CT to discuss concerns over a proposed $100,000 fee increase for H-1B visas, emphasizing its potential negative impact on small businesses and the economy.

On October 9, 2025, the Connecticut chapter of the Global Organization of People of Indian Origin (GOPIO-CT) held a virtual meeting with Congressman Jim Himes (CT-4) to address the contentious $100,000 fee hike for H-1B visas, a policy introduced during the Trump Administration. The meeting included GOPIO-CT officials, representatives from GOPIO International, and business owners who would be affected by this significant change.

Dr. Thomas Abraham, Chairman of GOPIO and Trustee and Advisor to the chapter, underscored the H-1B program’s substantial contribution to the U.S. economy, noting it generates over $200 billion annually while costing only $8.5 billion. He cautioned that increasing barriers for highly skilled professionals may drive them to seek opportunities in countries such as Canada, Germany, and China, which could result in long-term economic detriment for the United States.

Mahesh Jhangiani, President of GOPIO-CT, highlighted the disproportionate impact of the fee hike on small and medium-sized enterprises, which typically lack the resources to absorb such a steep cost unlike larger corporations. He also expressed concerns regarding what he characterized as anti-India policies from the current administration.

Members of GOPIO-CT, including Prasad Chintalapudi from Panzer Solutions and Shailesh Naik of Cameron Engineers, emphasized the role of small businesses employing H-1B workers in fostering local employment and driving economic growth. They pointed out that many successful leaders in the tech industry, such as Elon Musk, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, and Aravind Krishna, have benefitted from the H-1B program.

Attorney Nandita Ruchandani, representing Cameron Engineers, remarked on the critical sectors where H-1B visa holders work, including healthcare, education, engineering, and technology. She stressed that these immigrants not only contribute taxes and purchase homes but also support local communities. However, the prohibitive fee could jeopardize their employment.

Dr. S.K. Lo, Chairperson of the Asian American Unity Coalition (AAUC), also participated in the discussion, reinforcing the necessity of a collective approach to tackle these pressing issues.

Congressman Jim Himes, who is currently serving his ninth term and holds senior positions on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Financial Services Committee, expressed his full support for GOPIO-CT’s position. He acknowledged the risk of losing valuable talent and reiterated the importance of continued U.S.-India collaboration in areas such as commerce, trade, and defense.

For over two decades, GOPIO-CT has actively engaged in community programs, youth mentoring, policy discussions, and cultural initiatives. The chapter aims to promote awareness of Indian heritage while fostering dialogue and partnerships with local communities.

Source: Original article

Hamas Executes Rivals in Gaza Following Trump’s ‘War Is Over’ Declaration

Gaza faces a critical juncture as Hamas executes rivals to reassert control following President Trump’s declaration that “the war is over,” raising questions about the region’s future stability.

Gaza is at a pivotal moment as the deployment of a disarmament and stabilization force will be crucial in determining whether the region can begin rebuilding or if chaos will return.

Following President Donald Trump’s declaration in Israel’s Knesset that “the war is over” and the celebration of the return of remaining hostages, reports emerged of Hamas executing its opponents in Gaza City’s main square. Videos circulating on social media appear to show these executions, which an Israeli military official described as “Hamas’s deliberate attempt to show the killings publicly and reestablish its rule by terrorizing civilians.”

In conversations with Fox News Digital, residents of Gaza reported that Hamas fighters have reappeared on the streets, reasserting their control. However, some citizens expressed hope that this could be an opportunity for change and a chance to rid themselves of the terror regime.

Mukhaimar Abu Saada, a political analyst from Gaza, emphasized that disarming Hamas will not be a straightforward process. He noted that clashes between Hamas and local militias have already erupted. “This won’t happen quickly,” he stated. “We’re talking about an ideological organization. Even last night, people were killed in clashes between Hamas and local militias. It’s not a rosy road.”

Abu Saada revealed that Hamas has issued an ultimatum to collaborators with Israel, demanding they surrender and seek amnesty by October 19, provided they were not involved in killings. “They’re still strong,” he admitted. “Part of the reason they didn’t fight harder in the last days is that they saved some men and weapons for the day after. I still see Hamas police in the streets of Gaza. Trump said they lost thousands, but they’re still there, able to control the streets once Israel redeploys.”

One anonymous resident of Gaza expressed skepticism about the official declarations of peace. “You cannot say the war is finished,” he said. “We have to wait a few weeks to see what happens. There are gangs in Gaza now; Hamas is trying to fight them. If they don’t unify, another war could start.” He characterized Hamas as weakened and divided, stating, “Hamas is not strong like before. Those who remain are mostly police — not the real Hamas people who believe in their extremist jihadist ideology.” He emphasized the need for clarity regarding the future and the group’s survival, which he believes hinges on whether Hamas accepts the proposed deal.

Another resident echoed this uncertainty, saying, “No one knows what is happening — who will rule, what will happen with Hamas, and if the war is truly over. We hope for a better future. I just want me and my family to live without targeting, without bloodshed.” He noted that ordinary Gazans are exhausted but yearning for calm. “People just want the blood to stop. They want to stop losing their relatives and friends. It’s in their hands now — if they will allow Hamas to continue or finally rise up. But nothing is clear.”

Abu Saada asserted that there is “no question” Hamas will have to disarm eventually, describing it as an inevitable part of the plan announced by President Trump and endorsed by Israeli leadership. “The real question is who will hold those weapons — the Palestinian Authority or the so-called ‘security stabilization force’ that’s supposed to deploy next. It’s definitely going to happen, but we have to wait for the second phase of the negotiations.”

He added that even Qatari mediators have confirmed that disarmament “has not yet been discussed but will be discussed in the coming days.” For now, Gazans are focused on survival after enduring “two years of misery, destruction, and bloodshed.” Ultimately, he believes Hamas will have to comply, stating, “No Arab country will give a single dollar if Hamas doesn’t disarm. Rebuilding Gaza depends on Hamas no longer being in control. The war is over, but the real test is only beginning.”

While voices inside Gaza reflect uncertainty, experts in Washington assert that Hamas’s political and military isolation has never been greater. Jacob Olidort, director of the Center for American Security at the America First Policy Institute, told Fox News Digital that Hamas is “in the most militarily and diplomatically isolated place it has ever been.”

“Even before and after the release of hostages, Hamas has been defiant in tone,” Olidort noted. “But all of that will be overshadowed by the vast expansion of peace agreements between Israel and its neighbors. All of Israel’s regional partners are eager to normalize and build on where they left off prior to October 7.”

Olidort indicated that the upcoming Sharm el-Sheikh summit will mark the beginning of phase two of Trump’s plan. “Whatever is happening now on the ground doesn’t reflect Gaza’s future,” he said. “None of the steps in the peace plan have been implemented yet. What comes next will be defined by that summit and by the regional consensus that Hamas cannot continue to control Gaza.”

For Israel, he added, “the focus will be restarting, in a more public way, its regional and global partnerships — defense, commercial, and diplomatic. That’s where Israel’s future lies.” While the guns have fallen silent, the next stage — Hamas’ disarmament and the arrival of a stabilization force — will determine whether Gaza can finally begin rebuilding or slip back into chaos. As Abu Saada succinctly put it, “The war is over, but the question is whether peace will really begin.”

Source: Original article

SEC Claims India Did Not Respond in Adani Group Legal Proceedings

The U.S. SEC has informed a federal court that Indian authorities have not responded to its legal notices regarding the Adani Group, amid ongoing investigations into allegations of securities fraud.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently reported to a federal court that Indian authorities have failed to respond to its attempts to serve legal notices and complaints to executives at the Adani Group. This development comes as the SEC investigates the conglomerate over serious allegations, including securities fraud and a $265 million bribery scheme.

The case surrounding the Adani Group has garnered considerable attention in the United States, particularly as state regulators seek cooperation from Indian officials. According to reports, the SEC has made multiple attempts to reach India’s Ministry of Law to serve legal documents to Adani Group founder Gautam Adani and his nephew, Sagar Adani. Despite the SEC’s latest communication with the ministry on September 14, there has been no confirmation of delivery.

The SEC stated in its court filing, “The SEC will continue communicating with the India Ministry of Law and Justice and pursuing service of the defendants via the Hague Service Convention.” This indicates the agency’s commitment to ensuring that legal proceedings can move forward despite the challenges posed by international jurisdiction.

In 2024, prosecutors in Brooklyn charged the Adani Group with allegedly bribing Indian officials to secure electricity purchases from its subsidiary, Adani Green Energy. The SEC claims that the executives who benefited from these payments misled U.S. investors regarding the company’s anti-corruption measures.

The Adani Group has characterized the SEC’s allegations as “baseless” and has pledged to explore “all possible legal recourse” to dismiss the claims. In January, Adani Green Energy engaged independent law firms to conduct a thorough review of the charges against them.

On November 20, 2024, U.S. prosecutors charged Gautam Adani, his nephew Sagar Adani, and others with bribery, securities fraud, wire fraud, and related conspiracies. The SEC alleged that the defendants paid bribes totaling $244 million (approximately ₹2,029 crore) to secure solar power contracts across various Indian states, facilitated through the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI).

The SEC’s original complaint indicated that the U.S. indictment arose from claims that the Adani Group failed to disclose its involvement in a complex and high-value bribery scheme to U.S. investors. Since February, the SEC has been in contact with India’s Ministry of Law and Justice to serve notices to the Adani Group within India.

Earlier in February, the SEC had formally requested assistance from India’s law ministry to help deliver the summons. A report from March revealed that the Ministry of Law had forwarded the summons for Gautam Adani and others to a court in Ahmedabad, which was responsible for delivering the documents to Adani’s local address. However, it appears that the papers have not been served in the six months since that action.

In a filing dated August 11, the SEC reiterated its ongoing efforts to serve the Adani Group in India, emphasizing the importance of resolving these legal matters as the investigation continues.

Source: Original article

ChatGPT Not Suitable for Workplace Use, Says AWS’s Julia White

Amazon has unveiled Quick Suite, an AI-driven workspace designed to enhance productivity and compete with major players like Microsoft and Google in the enterprise AI market.

Amazon has officially launched Quick Suite, a new artificial intelligence platform that integrates chatbots and AI agents to streamline tasks such as data analysis, report generation, and content summarization. This innovative tool positions itself as a competitor to Microsoft 365 Copilot, Google Gemini, and OpenAI’s ChatGPT within the rapidly evolving enterprise AI landscape.

Quick Suite is priced at $20 per month and boasts seamless integration with popular enterprise tools, including Salesforce, Slack, Microsoft cloud storage, and Adobe applications. Amazon describes Quick Suite as “a new agentic teammate that quickly answers your questions at work and turns those insights into actions for you.” The platform aims to consolidate AI-powered research, business intelligence, and automation capabilities into a single, user-friendly workspace.

With Quick Suite, users can analyze data through natural language queries, quickly locate critical information across both internal and external sources, and automate processes ranging from simple tasks to complex workflows that span multiple departments. The tool is designed to enhance productivity and efficiency in the workplace.

Julia White, the marketing chief of AWS, emphasized the platform’s capabilities, stating, “We are putting this out now because both internal and external customers are like, ‘This thing’s good, let’s go.’ ChatGPT is great, but, you know, you can’t use it at work.” Her comments highlight the growing demand for secure and reliable AI solutions in professional environments.

The launch of Quick Suite comes amid heightened competition in the enterprise AI sector. Earlier this month, Google introduced its Gemini Enterprise plan, which offers various pricing tiers starting at $30 per user per month for Standard and Plus options, and $21 per user per month for startups. Microsoft’s 365 Copilot also targets enterprise users at a similar price point of $30 per user per month. Meanwhile, OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude provide enterprise tiers, though their pricing details remain undisclosed.

Google’s Gemini Enterprise allows customers to utilize its AI capabilities to analyze corporate data and access AI agents from a centralized platform. This offering includes a feature called Workbench, enabling users to coordinate AI agents for task automation, as well as a “taskforce” of prebuilt Google agents designed for deep research on various topics. Users can connect Gemini Enterprise to existing data sources, including Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Salesforce, and SAP, while also tracking and auditing agents to ensure they operate effectively and with the correct data.

As companies increasingly turn to AI solutions to enhance their operations, Amazon’s Quick Suite aims to capture businesses seeking secure and scalable options. With its competitive pricing and robust features, Quick Suite is poised to make a significant impact in the enterprise AI market.

Source: Original article

Trump Advocates Mortgage Fraud Investigations Targeting Political Opponents

President Donald Trump is amplifying allegations of mortgage fraud against political opponents, including New York Attorney General Letitia James, amid ongoing legal challenges.

President Donald Trump is intensifying his campaign against political opponents by raising allegations of mortgage fraud. This strategy comes as he faces various legal challenges, including ongoing investigations into his own business practices.

Recently, New York Attorney General Letitia James was indicted on charges of bank fraud and making false statements regarding a mortgage loan. Trump’s campaign has also directed its focus toward Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, who is accused of misrepresenting information on a mortgage application. Additionally, Senator Adam Schiff is reportedly under federal investigation for similar allegations.

Mortgage fraud typically involves the deliberate provision of false or omitted information on mortgage applications. This can include misrepresenting income, assets, or property occupancy. Trump’s probes have particularly centered on occupancy fraud, which occurs when a property is falsely claimed as a primary residence while it is actually rented out or unused.

Experts highlight that mortgage fraud is relatively rare, and proving malicious intent can be quite challenging. Clifford Rossi, a finance professor at the University of Maryland, noted that errors on mortgage forms can happen innocently. For instance, a borrower might mistakenly mark a property as their primary residence even if co-borrowers are living there.

Data indicates that only 1 in 116 mortgage applications in the second quarter of 2025 were flagged as potentially fraudulent, with occupancy fraud being even less common. This raises questions about the validity of the allegations being made against James, Cook, and Schiff.

James, who previously secured a significant civil victory against Trump for mortgage and tax fraud, is accused of claiming a property in Norfolk, Virginia, as a secondary residence while it was being rented out. She has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, labeling the charges as “baseless.” Civil rights groups have condemned the indictment, calling it an abuse of power. Schiff has echoed these sentiments, describing the investigation as a “vindictive prosecution.”

In response to the allegations, Cook has denied any wrongdoing concerning her vacation home and has initiated legal action to counter Trump’s attempts to remove her from her position. She asserts that the efforts against her are politically motivated.

Trump has publicly called for the swift prosecution of James, Schiff, and former FBI Director James Comey, asserting that “justice must be served.” He claims that legal experts support his stance on the matter.

However, legal specialists caution that proving intentional fraud is extremely difficult. Errors or misunderstandings on mortgage documents are common, making it challenging to establish malicious intent. Rossi, the former Citi risk officer, emphasized that even when fraud is suspected, prosecuting such cases can be quite complex.

Moreover, experts have raised ethical concerns regarding Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Pulte publicly requested investigations into Cook’s mortgage on social media rather than pursuing formal internal channels, which has sparked debate about the appropriateness of his actions.

As the legal battles unfold, the implications of these allegations could have significant consequences for the individuals involved and the broader political landscape.

Source: Original article

French Prime Minister Resigns After Short Tenure of Less Than a Month

French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has resigned after less than a month in office, marking the shortest tenure in the history of the Fifth Republic.

French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has resigned after serving less than a month in office, making his tenure the briefest in the history of the Fifth Republic. Appointed on September 9, 2025, Lecornu stepped down on October 6, 2025, just hours after unveiling his cabinet.

The resignation comes amid intense criticism from across the political spectrum. Both allies and opponents raised concerns about his cabinet appointments, which ultimately led to a significant loss of support within his own conservative camp. This development has intensified the political instability that has characterized President Emmanuel Macron’s administration since the 2024 legislative elections, which resulted in a deeply divided parliament.

In light of the crisis, President Macron had tasked Lecornu with holding urgent talks with various political parties to address the ongoing deadlock. However, the pressure from both far-right and far-left factions has severely limited Macron’s options. He now faces the difficult decision of whether to reappoint Lecornu, select a new prime minister, or call for snap elections.

The ongoing political turmoil is not without economic consequences. France’s GDP growth is now forecasted to slow to 0.7% in 2025, a decrease from the initial projection of 1%. This downturn is attributed to waning consumer and business confidence, which has led to reduced household consumption and investment.

As the situation continues to evolve, President Macron is confronted with critical decisions that will be essential for restoring stability and addressing the pressing economic and political challenges facing the nation.

Source: Original article

Netanyahu Gains Unexpected Support as Concerns Over Government Stability Rise

Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid extends support to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu amid ongoing hostage negotiations and concerns over the stability of Netanyahu’s government.

Two years after the tragic events of October 7, 2023, when Hamas terrorists attacked Israel, killing 1,200 individuals and taking 251 hostages into Gaza, the situation remains precarious. There is still no resolution regarding the hostages, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government faces the threat of collapse. In this challenging context, Netanyahu has found an unexpected ally in Yair Lapid, the leader of the opposition and former Prime Minister, who has offered a “security net” to help stabilize the government as negotiations with Hamas continue.

“Nothing is more important than making this deal, bringing our hostages back home,” Lapid stated in an interview with Fox News Digital.

Lapid’s support comes at a critical time, as right-wing leaders within Netanyahu’s coalition, including National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, have expressed dissatisfaction with Netanyahu’s acceptance of a peace plan proposed by former President Donald Trump. They have threatened to withdraw from the coalition multiple times over the past year.

Netanyahu’s coalition lost its majority in the Knesset in July when two ultra-Orthodox parties exited their ministerial roles following the expiration of an exemption that allowed religious students to avoid military conscription. This departure left Netanyahu’s coalition with control over just 50 of the 120 seats in the Knesset.

<p”Now he’s totally dependent on the extreme alt-right within his government that says no to any deal [with Hamas],” Lapid explained.

When asked about the likelihood of special elections being called once the Knesset reconvenes after its autumn break on October 19, Lapid responded, “very likely.” However, he noted that a special election would not occur before February or March 2026, as there is a designated timeframe for campaigning in Israel. Should the Knesset trigger an early election cycle by November, it would be just seven months earlier than the previously scheduled elections in October 2026.

Lapid believes that the Israeli public would support a more centrist government that includes both right and left factions. He argues that such a coalition would prioritize Israeli security while also working towards an end to the war in Gaza and restoring Jerusalem’s international standing.

“If there’s one thing I’m sorry about, [it] is the fact that nobody in the government has the political courage to stand up and say…this is a just war, we are doing what needs to be done in order to protect ourselves, but we are sorry for every child that loses his life,” Lapid remarked. “Children should not die in grownups’ wars.”

He expressed concern that the current government’s failure to articulate a clear strategy against Hamas has contributed to media bias and false reporting, ultimately costing Israel valuable international support, even from groups that have traditionally backed the nation.

Reflecting on a meeting he had with Netanyahu on October 7, 2023, Lapid described the prime minister as appearing “gray and tired and old all of a sudden.” He recalled telling Netanyahu, “Prime Minister, this is the worst day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust,” and urged the formation of a unity government. Lapid emphasized the need to remove extremists from the government to create a coalition capable of addressing the unprecedented challenges facing Israel.

Despite Lapid’s suggestions, he noted that Netanyahu was “reluctant” to pursue this path. “Until this day, I’m sorry about this. I thought it was the right thing to do, and I still think it was the right thing to do,” he added.

Netanyahu has been a prominent figure in Israeli politics for 15 years, first serving as Prime Minister from March 2009 to June 2021, and then regaining the position in December 2022. Lapid described Netanyahu’s lengthy tenure as “admirable” and a testament to his “resilience,” while also acknowledging the potential benefits of term limits, similar to those in the United States.

Lapid believes that Israelis are ready for a “unity government” in response to Netanyahu’s hard-right coalition. He anticipates that the upcoming elections will be “interesting,” crossing political lines and based on hope.

“It’s been the hardest two years of everybody’s lifetime. And for the first time in a long, long time, the fragility of Israeli society was tangible to us. And we need to rebuild,” Lapid concluded.

Netanyahu’s office did not respond to inquiries from Fox News Digital by the time this report was published.

Source: Original article

Kaelyn Faces Debt to Prevent Partner’s Deportation to El Salvador

Kaelyn’s unexpected romance with Yapa, an asylum seeker from Venezuela, has turned into a desperate fight against his deportation, leading her into significant debt for legal support.

Last summer, Kaelyn found herself at a Latin club in Wilmington, North Carolina, when a charming stranger asked her to dance. Initially reluctant, she was drawn in by his genuine demeanor. “If anyone else had asked, I would’ve said no, but Yapa is so genuine,” she recalls, using a pseudonym to protect his identity. What began as a dance blossomed into a deep friendship and romance, but it would soon lead to a desperate battle for Yapa’s freedom.

Yapa, who fled violence in Venezuela in 2022, was an asylum seeker with a legal work permit. He attended regular court hearings and worked as a delivery driver, aspiring to obtain his commercial trucking license. As their relationship grew, Kaelyn became an integral part of his life.

They celebrated Thanksgiving together, with Yapa bonding with Kaelyn’s family, even playing pool with her father. Her affection for him was evident as his sisters affectionately called her “reina,” a term of endearment meaning queen. They spent their time watching movies and overcoming language barriers with translation apps and Kaelyn’s college Spanish. Each morning, Yapa would text her to ask about her day, solidifying their connection.

Before meeting Yapa, Kaelyn rarely considered immigration policy. Originally from Connecticut, she had relocated to Wilmington for work in film location scouting. However, the political climate shifted dramatically after President Trump’s election, which sparked her concerns about the treatment of asylum seekers.

“People would tell me, ‘Oh, you’re overreacting,’” she says. “This isn’t 1930s Germany. And I’d say, ‘Yeah, but it’s starting to feel that way.’ Looking back now, while people were telling me I was being dramatic, I was actually underreacting.”

On February 22, 2025, Kaelyn’s worst fears materialized when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrived unexpectedly in the early morning hours while Yapa was preparing for work. Without explanation, they handcuffed him, confiscating his ID and work permit—documents that have not been returned. They provided no information about his destination, only that he was being deported.

Kaelyn was devastated when Yapa’s sister called to inform her of his detention. Just the night before, Yapa had stayed with her, and she had hoped to keep him close as a U.S. citizen, believing she could better advocate for his rights. “I couldn’t explain it, but I was so emotional,” she recalls of their final night together. “And he told me, ‘There’s no reason for them to take me.’” Now, they faced an urgent need to act to save him.

Yapa was transported to Georgia’s Stewart Detention Center, where he faced allegations of gang affiliation with the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA) during a hearing two months later. “Shocking is not even the word,” Kaelyn says, recalling her reaction. “I was shaking.”

In a recent court filing, ICE admitted it has no evidence linking Yapa to any gang. However, a ruling from the Trump administration complicates the situation for immigrants like Yapa, who entered the country recently and are now struggling to secure their release from detention. Yapa could remain incarcerated for up to a year while his asylum case is pending, facing the grim possibility of deportation to a dangerous environment.

Kaelyn’s fear of the allegations against Yapa was palpable, knowing that if he were deported, he could end up in CECOT, a notorious prison in El Salvador known for its brutality. “I thought, I’m going to have to live the rest of my life knowing he’s in there, and there’s nothing that we can do to get him out of there,” she reflects. The thought of Yapa, along with many other innocent individuals, being imprisoned in what some describe as a modern-day concentration camp is an “atrocity,” she asserts.

The emotional and financial toll on Kaelyn has been immense. She has hired multiple attorneys to advocate for Yapa and has incurred significant debt due to legal fees. Meanwhile, Yapa is held nearly nine hours away from Wilmington, with limited access to phone communication. In April, attorneys from the American Immigration Council and the ACLU took on part of Yapa’s case pro bono. By May, they secured a ruling that prevents the Trump administration from deporting Yapa to CECOT or elsewhere based on the Alien Enemies Act without allowing him a fair chance to contest the TdA allegations. While this decision brought some relief, Kaelyn’s life has been drastically altered.

Conversations with her sister now revolve primarily around updates on Yapa’s case and the latest developments in immigration policy. “We can’t be happy when there’s literally a member of our family who’s been taken from us,” she says. “I’ll never let this go. The administration thinks they’re sowing fear—but they’re creating activists. You can’t destroy someone’s life and expect us to stay quiet.”

Source: Original article

USA Cricket Faces Challenges Following USAC Bankruptcy Filing

The ongoing crisis in USA Cricket has led to the organization filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy amid governance issues and an ICC suspension, raising concerns about the future of cricket in the U.S.

USA Cricket (USAC) is facing a significant crisis as it has initiated bankruptcy proceedings, citing the need for a structural reorganization. This move comes in the wake of the International Cricket Council (ICC) suspending USAC’s membership due to ongoing governance failures.

Founded in 2017, USA Cricket serves as the official governing body for cricket in the United States. It is responsible for promoting, developing, and regulating the sport across the country. USAC is recognized by the ICC as the representative body for cricket in the U.S. and oversees the national teams, domestic leagues, and grassroots programs.

The organization aims to grow cricket in the United States by building a robust infrastructure, enhancing governance, and creating pathways for players to compete at international levels. USAC manages both the men’s and women’s national teams, which participate in ICC events and regional competitions.

In recent years, USAC has collaborated with American Cricket Enterprises (ACE) to launch Major League Cricket (MLC), a professional T20 league designed to elevate cricket’s profile and provide opportunities for both domestic and international players.

However, USAC has encountered significant challenges, including governance issues and financial disputes with ACE. In 2025, the ICC suspended USAC’s membership, citing repeated failures in governance. Following this suspension, USAC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as part of a restructuring effort aimed at stabilizing its operations and resolving ongoing conflicts.

Despite these setbacks, USAC remains committed to fostering the growth of cricket within the diverse American sporting landscape. The organization hopes to establish the U.S. as a competitive cricketing nation in the years to come.

In a statement, USAC described the bankruptcy filing as an “aggressive” and “legal” move necessary to “ensure the future of American cricket.” The organization noted that one contributing factor to its financial reorganization was the strain and operational interference stemming from the agreement with ACE.

USAC indicated that the original 50-year agreement with ACE heavily favored the latter and was not negotiated transparently. It was reportedly arranged by a board member who did not disclose conflicts of interest involving both himself and his employer.

Despite the challenges, there remains a sense of optimism within the cricket community regarding the sport’s future in the United States. The country’s diverse population and increasing interest in cricket provide a promising foundation for long-term growth.

The announcement of the bankruptcy filing was made public in a media release, where USAC stated that it had “voluntarily” filed for financial reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This decision is particularly concerning as it follows the ICC’s suspension of USAC on September 23 for serious breaches of membership criteria.

The ongoing crisis underscores significant challenges in governance, financial management, and organizational stability within USA Cricket. The ICC’s suspension signals a loss of confidence from the global cricket authority, while the termination of the long-term agreement with ACE and the ensuing legal battles reveal deep operational and financial conflicts within U.S. cricket administration.

The Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing reflects an urgent need for financial restructuring to ensure the survival and future growth of cricket in America. This turbulent period suggests that without effective reforms and resolution of disputes, USA Cricket’s ability to develop the sport nationally and compete internationally could be jeopardized.

The involvement of the ICC’s Normalization Committee and ongoing legal scrutiny indicate a potential path toward rebuilding. However, much will depend on transparent governance and clear financial accountability moving forward.

Source: Original article

New Report Highlights Impact of Expanded Travel Ban on Indian-Americans

A new report highlights the significant economic and humanitarian impacts of the Trump administration’s expanded travel ban, which affects immigration from 19 countries.

WASHINGTON, DC, August 6 — A report released today by the American Immigration Council outlines the extensive economic and humanitarian consequences of the Trump administration’s travel ban, which was expanded in June 2025 to restrict immigration from 19 countries. In 2022, nearly 300,000 individuals from these nations entered the United States, contributing approximately $715.6 million in taxes and filling essential roles in various sectors.

“Those affected by this travel ban are students, workers, and family members who pay taxes, support local economies, and fill jobs in industries facing massive shortages. We’re throwing all of that away, to the detriment of our communities and the U.S. economy,” stated Nan Wu, research director of the American Immigration Council.

According to 2023 data, of the 300,000 individuals from the countries impacted by the travel ban, 82 percent were employed, particularly in sectors already grappling with labor shortages, such as hospitality, construction, and manufacturing. The manufacturing sector alone is projected to face a shortfall of 1.9 million workers by 2033.

“The United States absolutely needs strong screening procedures to protect national security, but this travel ban isn’t how you do that. The Trump administration is trying to sell this policy as a security measure, but when you dig into the justifications, they don’t add up,” remarked Jeremy Robbins, executive director of the American Immigration Council. “Many of the targeted countries had fewer than 500 visa overstays last year. This isn’t about keeping America safe; it’s about keeping certain people out.”

While the original travel ban enacted in 2017 prompted widespread public protests, the 2025 version has seen a more subdued response, attributed to its gradual implementation and expanded exemptions. However, the report emphasizes that the negative impacts remain significant.

“This quieter version of the ban is deeply harmful,” Robbins added. “It separates families, blocks international talent, and hurts communities across the country. The absence of airport protests doesn’t mean the harm isn’t real; it’s just happening more quietly and more bureaucratically.”

Reports suggest that the administration is contemplating the addition of 36 more countries to the travel ban. If implemented, this could prevent tens of thousands of additional individuals from entering the United States, further exacerbating the economic, social, and diplomatic repercussions.

The countries currently affected by the travel ban include:

All travel banned:

Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.

Visas sharply restricted:

Venezuela, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, and Turkmenistan.

This report underscores the far-reaching implications of the travel ban, highlighting the need for a reevaluation of policies that impact both the economy and the lives of individuals seeking opportunities in the United States.

Source: Original article

US Proposes $100,000 Fee for H-1B Visas Amid Regulatory Changes

The U.S. government has implemented a $100,000 annual fee for H-1B and L-1 visa applications, a decision that could significantly affect Indian professionals in the tech sector.

Washington D.C. – The United States government has introduced a substantial $100,000 annual fee for employers applying for H-1B and L-1 visas. This move is anticipated to have a significant impact on Indian professionals working in the U.S. tech sector. The fee, which takes effect immediately, adds to the existing costs associated with obtaining these visas and aims to prioritize higher-wage foreign workers.

In conjunction with the fee, lawmakers, including Senators Chuck Grassley and Dick Durbin, have proposed new legislation aimed at tightening visa regulations. This proposed legislation seeks to raise wage requirements and limit eligibility for certain organizations, further complicating the landscape for foreign workers seeking employment in the United States. Additionally, Senator Tom Cotton has suggested that restrictions be placed on foreign hires at universities and non-profit organizations.

As India is the largest source of H-1B visa holders, this new fee structure may lead to a slowdown in employment opportunities for Indian tech professionals. U.S. companies are likely to adjust their hiring practices in response to the increased costs associated with these visas. Leaders within the tech industry have expressed concerns regarding potential disruptions to workforce planning and recruitment efforts, as the new regulations may deter companies from hiring foreign talent.

The government asserts that these measures are designed to protect American workers and prevent the misuse of visa programs, while still ensuring that skilled foreign workers can fill critical roles in the U.S. economy. The balance between protecting domestic labor and allowing for the influx of skilled foreign professionals remains a contentious issue as these changes take effect.

As the implications of the new fee and proposed regulations unfold, stakeholders in the tech industry and potential visa applicants will be closely monitoring how these changes will affect the hiring landscape and the broader economy.

Source: Original article

Kwatra Engages with Indian Armed Forces Medical Team in Washington

Indian Ambassador Vinay Kwatra recently met with the Armed Forces Medical Services of India in Washington, D.C., to strengthen military medical cooperation between India and the United States.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Indian Ambassador to the United States Vinay Kwatra engaged with the visiting officers of the Armed Forces Medical Services of India during their recent trip to Washington.

In a post on X, Kwatra shared details of his interaction with Surgeon Vice Admiral Arti Sarin and her team. He noted that their visit aimed to foster collaboration with their counterparts at U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM), the Defense Health Agency (DHA), and the Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Kwatra emphasized that enhancing cooperation in military medicine is a vital component of the robust bilateral defense relationship between India and the United States.

Despite ongoing tensions related to trade, the security ties between India and the U.S. have remained resilient. This meeting underscores the commitment of both nations to strengthen their defense collaboration.

Earlier in September, Ambassador Kwatra met with U.S. Undersecretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby at the Pentagon. Following their discussion, Kwatra described the meeting as productive, highlighting the importance of reviewing current agendas and establishing actionable paths for various initiatives in India-U.S. defense cooperation. He praised Colby for his deep knowledge and consistent support for their strategic partnership.

Colby also acknowledged the significance of their meeting, expressing his enthusiasm for continuing to enhance defense cooperation with India.

These diplomatic interactions come shortly after the conclusion of the 21st edition of Exercise Yudh Abhyas 2025, an annual bilateral Army-to-Army exercise between India and the United States, which took place in Alaska. The exercise wrapped up on September 14 after two weeks of intensive training.

In a statement released on September 15, the Indian embassy in Washington characterized the exercises as a hallmark of the growing military-to-military interaction between the two nations, aligning with the Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership established between India and the U.S.

As both countries continue to navigate complex geopolitical landscapes, their commitment to strengthening military ties remains a focal point of their relationship.

Source: Original article

Nearly Half of Fortune 500 Companies Founded by Immigrants or Their Children

Nearly half of the Fortune 500 companies in 2025 were founded by immigrants or their children, generating significant revenue and employment opportunities across the United States.

WASHINGTON, DC, August 21, 2025 — A recent analysis of the 2025 Fortune 500 list reveals that 46.2 percent of America’s largest companies, or 231 out of 500, were founded by immigrants or their children. These companies collectively generated an impressive $8.6 trillion in revenue during the fiscal year 2024 and employed over 15.4 million people worldwide. This data highlights the crucial role that immigrants play in fostering innovation, driving economic growth, and creating jobs in the United States.

This figure represents the highest level recorded since the American Immigration Council began tracking immigrant entrepreneurs in its annual reviews of the Fortune 500 list in 2011.

“Immigrants are a driving force behind America’s prosperity. We need immigration policies that reflect that, instead of investing billions of dollars into detention, deportation, and making it incredibly difficult for foreign workers to come here or even renew their visas. These reckless policies undermine America’s greatest competitive advantage: the talent and drive of immigrants,” said Nan Wu, director of research at the American Immigration Council.

Companies founded by immigrants or their children have significantly transformed various industries, including technology, retail, and media. Notable names on the list include Amazon, Apple, NVIDIA, Levi Strauss & Co., Ace Hardware, and Sirius XM Holdings.

Key findings from the analysis indicate that these Fortune 500 companies, established by immigrants or their descendants, generated $8.6 trillion in revenue during fiscal year 2024. This revenue, if compared to national GDPs, would rank as the third-largest economy globally.

Moreover, these companies employed over 15.4 million individuals worldwide, a workforce comparable to the population of the fifth-largest U.S. state. Immigrants and their children founded 80 percent of the Fortune 500 companies in professional and other services, 65.6 percent in manufacturing, and 57.5 percent in information technology.

Among the 14 companies that made their debut on the Fortune 500 list this year, 10 were founded by immigrants or their children.

“Immigrants built nearly half of our Fortune 500 companies, created millions of jobs, and keep our economy competitive. And yet U.S. political leaders are making it increasingly difficult for foreign talent to come here or stay. It’s economic self-sabotage. If we want to stay the world’s innovation leader, we should be welcoming immigrants, not attacking them,” stated Steve Hubbard, senior data scientist at the American Immigration Council.

The American Immigration Council has experts available to provide further insights into the benefits that immigrants contribute to the U.S. economy at both national and state levels.

Source: Original article

Saare Jahan Se Accha: Exploring Silent Wars That Shape Nations

Netflix’s ‘Saare Jahan Se Accha: The Silent Guardians’ explores the covert struggles of India during the 1960s and 1970s, intertwining history with espionage in a gripping narrative.

Released to coincide with India’s 79th Independence Day, Saare Jahan Se Accha: The Silent Guardians on Netflix is a meticulously crafted spy thriller that immerses viewers in the covert struggles of a young nation during the 1960s and 1970s. The series takes its name from the 1904 patriotic Urdu song, Saare Jahan Se Accha (or Taranah-e-Hind), written by Allama Muhammad Iqbal. Season 1 paints a vivid portrait of the conflicts arising from colonialism among nations intertwined by shared histories, literature, culture, and poetry.

Created by Gaurav Shukla, the series is rooted in historical fiction, drawing from real events that shaped India’s trajectory. Central to the narrative is the life and mysterious death of Dr. Homi J. Bhabha, often referred to as the “father of India’s nuclear program.” A physicist educated at Cambridge, Bhabha was deeply involved in nuclear research, envisioning atomic energy as the cornerstone of India’s industrial future. With the support of J. R. D. Tata, he established the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) in 1945 and later the Atomic Energy Establishment at Trombay. His untimely death in the 1966 Mont Blanc plane crash significantly altered the course of India’s nuclear ambitions. In his memory, TIFR was renamed the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), serving as a pivotal backdrop for the espionage saga that unfolds in the series.

Equally significant is the establishment of the Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW), India’s foreign intelligence agency, founded in 1968 under R. N. Kao. Following Bhabha’s death, India’s security vulnerabilities became glaringly apparent. R&AW’s mission was clear: to safeguard national sovereignty, gather intelligence abroad, and counter Pakistan’s nuclear aspirations. The Silent Guardians dramatizes these formative years through the character of Vishnu Shankar, a diplomat on a covert mission in Islamabad. The series pays tribute to the sacrifices of operatives who worked in secrecy, often at great personal cost and without recognition.

At the heart of the series is Vishnu Shankar, portrayed by Pratik Gandhi, a perceptive and intelligent R&AW officer who skillfully balances the demeanor of a diplomat with the cunning of a seasoned spy. Gandhi delivers a magnetic performance, characterized by a sharp, understated presence that conveys quiet nobility. His calm wit and confidence inspire trust, whether in tender moments with his wife Mohini, played by Tillotama Shome, or in tense yet humane interactions with his colleague Sukhbir.

The supporting cast enhances the narrative’s depth. Kritika Kamra shines as Fatima Khan, a courageous Pakistani journalist navigating the treacherous waters of truth and survival. Suhail Nayyar’s portrayal of Sukhbir, alias Rafiq, captures a blend of warmth, wit, desperation, and loyalty amid his perilous double life. Sunny Hinduja delivers a chilling performance as Ali Murtaza Malik, the ruthless ISI chief, whose ability to detect a spy with a mere handshake adds tension to the storyline. Tillotama Shome brings depth to Mohini, the conflicted yet devoted wife of a spy, while Rajat Kapoor embodies R. N. Kao with calm authority and resolve.

Visually, cinematographers Dmytro Nedria, Debojeet Ray, and Jay I. Patel effectively capture the vibrant streets of Karachi and Islamabad, the frenetic energy of stock exchanges, shadowy alleys, and smoky Parisian bars where an ISI operative encounters a carefully laid trap. The editing by Aarif Sheikh maintains a tense, binge-worthy pace across the six-episode arc, while Ketan Sodha’s score amplifies the urgency of each mission.

One of the series’ notable achievements is its nuanced exploration of patriotism. For the Indian characters, patriotism manifests as a collective duty, characterized by quick thinking, strategic foresight, and the willingness to sacrifice for the nation’s well-being. In contrast, the portrayal of patriotism across the border is marked by individual bravado—ego-driven, reckless, and intertwined with personal pride and national ambition. This juxtaposition elevates the narrative beyond a conventional spy-versus-spy conflict.

As the final credits roll, the series leaves viewers with a sobering reminder of the profound human stakes behind historical headlines. From the explosion that claims Bhabha’s life to the destruction of a French shipment carrying radioactive material, and the sacrifices of informants like Brigadier Naushad, who provides crucial intelligence on Pakistan’s nuclear procurement before meeting a tragic fate, The Silent Guardians underscores that espionage is often waged in silence, far from public memory, yet with consequences that shape nations.

Saare Jahan Se Accha: The Silent Guardians evokes memories of family visits to the beautifully manicured BARC gardens in Chembur, stirring a deep sense of national pride. This narrative of loyalty, betrayal, and the invisible guardians shaping India’s destiny is compelling. With gripping writing, stellar performances, and a captivating protagonist, it stands out as a must-watch espionage thriller.

Source: Original article

Trump’s H-1B Visa Policy Threatens U.S.-India Tech Relations

Last week’s H-1B visa proclamation by the Trump administration has ignited a fierce debate over its implications for the tech industry and U.S.-India relations.

Last week’s proclamation regarding the H-1B visa program has set the stage for an intense and contentious debate, as tech firms strive to protect their access to global talent while critics advocate for even stricter regulations.

In Silicon Valley, the reaction to the new policy, which imposes a staggering $100,000 fee on H-1B visas, has been largely subdued. Many tech executives are hesitant to publicly criticize President Trump, aware that he often perceives even constructive dissent as an affront. Some industry leaders have even framed the fee as a means to safeguard American jobs, aligning themselves with the administration’s agenda.

However, behind the scenes, lobbying efforts are in full swing. Corporate legal teams and industry groups are working diligently to persuade the administration to reconsider the measure. Their efforts have already yielded some results.

Initially, the White House indicated that the $100,000 fee would apply to all H-1B visas, both new and existing. This announcement caused widespread panic among current H-1B holders, prompting many to rush back to the U.S. before the effective date. Airlines experienced a surge in demand and last-minute cancellations as a result. By the following Sunday, the administration clarified that the fee would only apply to new petitions, alleviating some concerns.

Criticism of the H-1B program has historically followed two main arguments. Trump and his supporters contend that companies exploit the program, using it as a loophole rather than a legitimate talent pipeline. They also assert that it suppresses wages and displaces American workers, as lower-paid foreign employees compete with U.S. graduates.

The recent proclamation is viewed by U.S. officials as the first step toward reforming the H-1B program. The White House announced that the Department of Labor would begin revising and increasing prevailing wage levels, aiming to ensure that the program supports only the most highly qualified foreign workers.

Simultaneously, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is preparing to restructure the H-1B lottery system, prioritizing higher-paid, highly skilled applicants over those at lower wage levels. This shift is expected to spark months of heated debate. Tech companies, which rely heavily on global talent, are likely to push back against what they perceive as punitive measures, while critics of the program will seize the opportunity to advocate for deeper cuts.

Some politicians are already calling for additional restrictions on global talent. Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, a long-time critic of the H-1B program, has urged the DHS to halt work authorizations for international students graduating from U.S. universities. In a recent social media post, Grassley argued that foreign students directly compete with American workers and warned that their presence poses risks of tech and corporate espionage.

If further restrictions are imposed on the visa program, the impact on India could be severe. No other country relies more on the H-1B program than India, where nationals consistently account for over 70 percent of annual approvals.

The H-1B program has significantly influenced India’s economic trajectory in three key ways. Firstly, it has fueled the remarkable growth of the Indian IT industry. Major outsourcing firms like Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), and Wipro have been among the heaviest users of H-1B visas. The steady influx of Indian engineers to the U.S. has contributed to the rise of a $300 billion IT services industry in India, creating numerous jobs within the country.

Secondly, the program has been a substantial source of revenue for India. Conservative estimates suggest that between one and two million Indians have received H-1B visas since the program’s inception in 1990. Currently, Indian workers in the U.S. send back more than $30 billion annually in remittances, supporting families and bolstering the Indian economy.

Lastly, the H-1B pipeline has played a crucial role in expanding the U.S. Indian American community, which has evolved into a significant political force. Their financial and intellectual contributions have served as a bridge between Washington and New Delhi, strengthening bilateral ties.

Of course, the United States has also greatly benefited from the H-1B program. It has been instrumental in building the talent pool of Silicon Valley. Many of America’s most iconic innovations, from semiconductors to social media, have been driven by Indian-born engineers and executives.

However, the new $100,000 fee and the potential for further restrictions pose a threat to this vital talent pipeline. Companies may find it prohibitively expensive to hire foreign talent, which could lead them to scale back or outsource more work overseas. Startups and mid-sized firms, in particular, may struggle to compete for skills on a global scale.

A recent report from JPMorgan Chase projected that the fee could result in 5,500 fewer H-1B applications each month. Additionally, it may deter foreign students from pursuing education in the U.S., further diminishing the talent pool available to American companies.

For the U.S., this policy could undermine its global competitiveness. Tech executives have quietly warned that if hiring foreign workers becomes too costly, companies may accelerate the trend of establishing Global Capability Centers (GCCs) in India and other countries, shifting high-value work abroad rather than creating jobs in America.

For India, the proclamation represents a “double whammy.” Economically, it threatens to impact its largest export market, coming on the heels of the administration’s 50 percent tariff on Indian goods. Diplomatically, it risks straining U.S.-India relations at a time when Washington views New Delhi as a key partner in countering China and securing technology supply chains.

Source: Original article

Trump Agency’s Social Media Reach Exceeds MSNBC, CNN Viewership, DHS Reports

The Department of Homeland Security’s social media reach has significantly surpassed that of MSNBC and CNN, according to recent metrics obtained by Fox News Digital.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reported that its social media reach outperformed that of legacy media outlets MSNBC and CNN during the summer months, with millions of media impressions across various platforms.

Exclusive metrics obtained by Fox News Digital reveal that DHS’s social media accounts, which include channels on Facebook, Instagram, and X, garnered approximately 6,395,700 daily impressions in July. This figure starkly contrasts with the daily viewership numbers for MSNBC and CNN, which averaged about 502,000 and 333,000 viewers, respectively.

In prime time, MSNBC attracted around 738,000 viewers, while CNN’s viewership reached approximately 440,000, according to data from Nielsen Media Research. The previous month, June, also saw DHS outperforming these outlets, with social media impressions totaling roughly 3,390,600. During that time, MSNBC averaged 593,000 daily viewers, and CNN had about 450,000.

The metrics compiled by DHS were derived from internal reports, which were subsequently verified using Sprout Social, a social media management tool. An “impression” is defined as the number of times a post or content appears on a user’s screen, regardless of whether the user engages with it.

DHS has adopted a distinctive approach to its social media strategy, incorporating memes, GIFs, and traditional American-style recruiting graphics to promote U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Sources within DHS indicated that one of their goals is to depict an idealized vision of what an American homeland represents.

This innovative strategy has not only been employed by DHS but has also been mirrored by other government agencies and the White House. Notably, during the Trump administration, DHS experienced a remarkable 34-fold increase in weekly reach compared to the Biden administration. In July 2024, the Biden administration’s DHS reported just 700,000 weekly impressions, while the Trump administration’s DHS, under Secretary Kristi Noem, achieved an impressive 46.1 million impressions.

Despite receiving criticism from some legacy media outlets regarding its social media style, DHS remains committed to its current approach, including the ongoing ICE recruiting campaign. A Washington Post opinion piece even labeled the agency’s videos as “preposterous,” suggesting they were part of a “holy war” to promote their agenda.

As the landscape of media consumption continues to evolve, the Department of Homeland Security’s social media strategy exemplifies a shift in how government agencies engage with the public, aiming to reach audiences where they are most active.

Source: Original article

Trump Unveils New Tariffs on Pharmaceutical Imports Impacting Indian-American Companies

President Donald Trump has announced new tariffs on pharmaceutical imports, escalating trade tensions and reshaping U.S. economic policy while pressuring allies like India over oil imports.

President Donald Trump is intensifying his tariff strategy, recently unveiling a new wave of tariffs that includes a staggering 100% levy on branded or patented drug imports, effective October 1. This move is contingent on companies establishing manufacturing facilities in the United States.

In 2025, tariffs have become a cornerstone of Trump’s economic agenda, with significant increases in trade duties enacted under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. Earlier this year, Trump reinstated and expanded tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, raising rates to 50% and eliminating exemptions for specific countries.

These tariffs, justified on national security grounds, now encompass a wider array of downstream metal products. In July, Trump also imposed new 50% tariffs on copper and copper-based goods, again citing national security concerns. However, this appears to be just the beginning of his aggressive tariff policies.

In addition to pharmaceuticals, the administration plans to impose a 25% import tax on all heavy-duty trucks and a 50% levy on kitchen and bathroom cabinets. Trump stated that these measures are necessary due to the “large scale ‘FLOODING’ of these products into the United States by other outside countries,” emphasizing the need to protect U.S. manufacturers.

Neil Shearing, chief economist at Capital Economics, commented that the tariff announcement regarding pharmaceuticals may not be as significant as it initially seems. He noted that many of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies either already have production facilities in the U.S. or have announced plans to establish them in the near future.

William Bain, head of trade policy at the British Chambers of Commerce, echoed this sentiment, stating that leading pharmaceutical companies in the UK have committed to substantial investments in the U.S., particularly in advanced manufacturing. He believes this commitment should shield them from any new duties.

The tariffs on heavy-duty trucks are intended to protect U.S. manufacturers from what Trump describes as “unfair outside competition.” The new duties on kitchen and bathroom cabinets, along with other furniture, are a response to high import levels that have adversely affected local manufacturers.

Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy is also placing India in a difficult position. According to a Bloomberg report, Indian officials, during their recent visit to the U.S., reiterated their concerns to the Trump administration regarding oil imports. They indicated that a significant reduction in Russian oil purchases by Indian refiners would require Washington’s approval for crude imports from Iran and Venezuela, both of which are currently under U.S. sanctions.

Faced with a 25% additional penal tariff on its crude trade with Russia, India has requested the U.S. to permit oil imports from Iran and Venezuela.

By imposing steep tariffs on a wide range of imported goods—including steel, aluminum, copper, pharmaceuticals, heavy trucks, and household furniture—Trump’s administration aims to protect domestic industries deemed vital for national security and economic resilience. These measures are designed to reduce reliance on foreign suppliers, encourage the onshoring of manufacturing, and safeguard American jobs from what Trump characterizes as unfair foreign competition and an influx of inexpensive imports.

While some industry experts argue that sectors like pharmaceuticals may be less affected due to existing or planned U.S. production, the overall approach indicates a more aggressive stance on global trade relations. This policy could lead to increased costs for consumers and businesses reliant on imported materials, but it also incentivizes investment in U.S. manufacturing capabilities.

The situation with India highlights the broader complexities and potential unintended consequences of aggressive tariff policies. While these measures are aimed at protecting domestic industries and enhancing national security, they can disrupt established global supply chains and create tensions with key allies. Countries like India, caught between adhering to U.S. trade regulations and addressing their own economic needs, may seek exemptions or negotiate terms to mitigate economic challenges.

Source: Original article

Ending OPT May Have Greater Impact Than H-1B Fee Increase for Tech Workers

Recent U.S. policy changes regarding the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program may have more significant implications for tech workers than the newly proposed H-1B visa fees.

Recent shifts in U.S. immigration policy have intensified the focus on the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, overshadowing discussions about the newly proposed fees for H-1B visa applications. This change is particularly relevant for tech workers, as many analysts contend that restricting or eliminating OPT could have a more profound impact on workforce dynamics than the increased fees associated with H-1B applications.

The administration has introduced a substantial fee of $100,000 for certain H-1B visa applicants, a move aimed at discouraging companies from hiring foreign workers under specific circumstances. The intention behind this fee hike is to ensure that only the most critical or specialized roles continue to qualify for H-1B visas under these tightened regulations.

In contrast, the OPT program allows international students to remain in the U.S. and work temporarily after graduation, typically for a duration of up to three years for those in STEM fields. Because OPT is linked to student status rather than work visas, any changes to this program could impact a broader range of early-career workers. Many view OPT as a more accessible and expedited pathway into the U.S. tech workforce. The potential removal or significant restriction of this program could eliminate a crucial stepping stone for recent graduates.

The implications of ending or limiting OPT are particularly concerning for several groups. Recent graduates who rely on OPT to gain professional experience after completing their studies would be directly affected. Additionally, employers who depend on OPT workers for entry-level positions before pursuing long-term sponsorship would face challenges. Furthermore, international students often base their decisions to study in the U.S. on the availability of post-graduation work options, making OPT a vital consideration in their educational journey.

Beyond these immediate effects, the broader implications for the tech sector could be significant. A reduction or elimination of the OPT program could hinder the influx of fresh talent into the tech workforce, leading to increased competition for available roles. This situation may drive more applicants to seek opportunities in countries with more favorable work-visa policies. Additionally, larger firms that can more easily navigate stricter requirements may gain an advantage, further complicating the landscape for smaller companies and startups.

In summary, while the proposed increase in H-1B fees may present challenges for some employers and applicants, the potential restriction of the OPT pathway could result in more immediate and widespread disruption. This is especially true for new graduates and early-career professionals striving to enter the U.S. tech industry.

Source: Original article

Women in Leadership Reaches 20% in 2025 Avtar and Seramount Study

Avtar’s latest study reveals that women’s representation in leadership roles in India has reached 20%, marking a significant milestone in workplace inclusion efforts.

Chennai (Tamil Nadu) [India], September 25: Avtar, a leading workplace culture consulting and inclusion solutions company in India, has released findings from the 10th edition of its Best Companies for Women in India (BCWI) listing. This year’s results highlight a noteworthy advancement in the integration of inclusion as a critical business imperative within Indian corporations.

The BCWI listing features 125 companies, and for the first time, women’s representation in leadership roles has reached 20%. Overall, women’s representation among the Best Companies remains stable at 35.7%. The Professional Services sector leads with 44.6% of its workforce comprising women, followed closely by the ITES sector at 41.7%. Other sectors, including Pharma, FMCG, and Manufacturing, are also intensifying their inclusion efforts, with women making up 25%, 23%, and 12% of their respective workforces.

The study also explored the reasons behind employee attrition among both women and men. It found that attrition rates are similar for both genders, hovering around 20%. The primary reason for leaving organizations is the pursuit of better job opportunities. Interestingly, health and well-being challenges have emerged as a significant reason for women exiting the workplace, surpassing even childcare responsibilities.

This year, the BCWI received 365 applications from organizations across various industries, regions, and sectors in India. Companies from diverse fields such as Automotive, BFSI, Chemical, Consumer Products, E-Commerce, Healthcare, IT, and Telecommunications made it to the Best Companies List. The 2025 Avtar & Seramount Top 10 Best Companies for Women in India, listed alphabetically, includes Accenture Solutions Private Limited, AXA XL India Business Services Pvt. Ltd, Cairn Oil and Gas Vedanta Limited, EY, KPMG in India, Mastercard Incorporation, Optum Global Solutions (India) Private Limited, Procter & Gamble India, Tech Mahindra Limited, and Wipro Limited. The complete list can be viewed on Avtar’s website.

In addition to the BCWI findings, Avtar also released the seventh edition of its Most Inclusive Companies Index (MICI), which highlights organizational commitment to diversity, including Persons with Disabilities (PwD), LGBTQ+ individuals, and cultural diversity. The focus on employing People with Disabilities has surged from 58% in 2019 to a remarkable 100% this year. The companies featured in the MICI collectively employ 9,687 individuals with disabilities. Furthermore, LGBTQ+ inclusion has gained significant traction, with 95% of companies now focusing on this area, up from just 23% in 2019.

For the first time, Avtar introduced the Top 10 Best Companies for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria. The BCESG framework evaluates companies based on their environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and governance excellence. The study revealed that 90% of companies have adopted energy efficiency strategies, while 80% are utilizing solar energy. However, hydroelectric and wind energy remain underutilized due to infrastructure and geographic limitations. Notably, all participating companies have formal policies for occupational safety and health, and 90% provide ESG-specific training to their employees. The 2025 Avtar & Seramount Top 10 Best Companies for ESG, listed alphabetically, includes CGI, Eaton Technologies Pvt Ltd, EPAM Systems India Private Limited, GRP LTD, Infosys Limited, Lear Corporation, Solenis Chemicals, Tata Communications Ltd, UST, and Wipro Limited. The full list is also available on Avtar’s website.

Dr. Saundarya Rajesh, Founder and President of Avtar, expressed her enthusiasm for the progress made in workplace inclusion. “My heartiest congratulations to all our winners for bringing inclusion and belonging to life through intention and focused action! The results are here for us to see—from an average women’s representation of 25% in 2016, the best companies have collectively grown to 35.7% women’s representation this year. Women in C-suite leadership now stands at an impressive 20%, up from 13% in 2016. What’s truly encouraging is that these efforts extend beyond multinational corporations—the share of Indian companies featured in the Best Companies listing has increased from 25% in 2021 to 40% this year,” she stated.

Dr. Rajesh further noted, “As we honor the achievements of these frontrunners, many of whose journeys we have witnessed over the past decade, we are also inspired by the broader movement they are driving. This movement empowers women, enables allies, embraces diverse identities, and engages responsibly with sustainability, helping unlock the full potential of the workforce!”

Subha Barry, President of Seramount, remarked on the significance of the Most Inclusive Companies Index, stating, “What inspires me about the Most Inclusive Companies Index is the real change it sparks—helping organizations in India break down barriers, design thoughtful solutions, and open new opportunities for underrepresented talent. This recognition reflects the passion and commitment of leaders who are creating workplaces where women, LGBTQ+ employees, persons with disabilities, and talent across generations feel valued and can truly thrive.”

Founded in 2000 by Dr. Saundarya Rajesh, Avtar is recognized as one of India’s leading workplace culture consulting and inclusion solution firms. The organization supports numerous companies in creating diverse and supportive workplaces and is credited with introducing the concepts of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) to Indian corporates. Avtar is also the largest provider of second career opportunities for women in the country, offering a wide range of services, including culture diagnostics, inclusion enablement training, conferences, and culture-first hiring solutions.

Seramount, a strategic professional services and research firm, is dedicated to fostering high-performing, inclusive workplaces. With over four decades of experience, Seramount partners with more than 450 influential companies to provide pragmatic solutions, including best practice DEI research, workplace assessments, employee learning and development, and talent sourcing.

For more information, please visit Avtar’s and Seramount’s websites.

Source: Original article

Adani Group Chairman Rejects Hindenburg Research, Claims Truth Prevails

Adani Group Chairman Gautam Adani celebrates the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s dismissal of Hindenburg Research’s allegations, asserting that the truth has prevailed and reaffirming the company’s commitment to transparency and resilience.

Gautam Adani, Chairman of the Adani Group, expressed his satisfaction with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for rejecting significant claims made by the short-seller Hindenburg Research. In a letter to shareholders, Adani characterized the regulator’s decision as a powerful affirmation of the company’s governance standards and declared that “truth has prevailed.”

The SEBI’s ruling marks the conclusion of a tumultuous chapter that began over two years ago when Hindenburg Research published a report that wiped out $150 billion in market value for the conglomerate and subjected it to intense scrutiny. Adani emphasized that the outcome highlights the resilience of the group, which has been tested on “every dimension.”

Reflecting on the January 2023 report from Hindenburg Research, Adani described it as a moment that shook India’s financial markets. He noted that the allegations were not only an attack on his conglomerate but also “a direct challenge to the audacity of Indian enterprises to dream on a global scale.” Just last week, SEBI dismissed the market manipulation charges that Hindenburg had leveled against the Adani Group.

According to SEBI, the claims of fraud related to alleged related-party dealings within the Adani Group were “not established.” The regulator found no evidence of violations by the Adani Group, which operates across various sectors including ports, coal, renewable energy, media, and airports.

Adani remarked, “What was meant to weaken us has instead strengthened the very core of our foundations.” He emphasized that this moment represents more than just regulatory clearance; it serves as a validation of the transparency, governance, and purpose with which the company has always operated.

While the group’s market value has not yet returned to pre-Hindenburg levels, Adani noted that its operations have significantly strengthened. Over the past two years, the portfolio EBITDA surged by 57% to ₹89,806 crore (approximately $10.8 billion), alongside a 48% increase in gross block assets, which now stand at ₹6.1 lakh crore.

Adani highlighted several key infrastructure achievements during this period, including the launch of India’s first container transshipment port at Vizhinjam in Kerala, the addition of 6 GW of renewable energy capacity through the Khavda project—recognized as the world’s largest single-site renewable installation—and the commencement of operations at the world’s largest copper smelter and metallurgical complex. Additionally, the group rolled out 4 GW of new thermal power capacity and established 7,000 circuit kilometers of transmission lines across India and abroad.

Looking ahead, Adani outlined the group’s priorities, which include enhancing governance, driving innovation, and expanding infrastructure investments. “We will double down on nation building,” he stated, acknowledging the stress experienced by investors, lenders, and partners during the recent crisis. He promised to enhance governance, accelerate innovation and sustainability efforts, and increase investments in the country’s infrastructure.

In closing, Adani urged a recommitment to the company’s core principles: resilience in adversity, integrity in action, and an unwavering commitment to building a brighter future for India and the world. He concluded his letter with lines from poet Sohan Lal Dwivedi, likening the group’s journey to a boat navigating turbulent waters: “The boat that fears the waves can never reach the shore, But those who keep on trying will win forevermore…”

Source: Original article

The $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee and Its Impact on Indian-Americans

The Trump Administration’s recent $100,000 fee for H-1B visa applications has raised concerns among the Indian diaspora, particularly regarding its implications for skilled workers seeking employment in the U.S.

On September 19, the Trump Administration announced a significant change to the H-1B visa program, aimed at protecting American jobs. This new policy introduces a $100,000 fee for certain H-1B visa applicants, a dramatic increase from the previous fee of $215. The change is set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. ET on September 21 and will remain in place for one year, with the possibility of extension.

The announcement has sparked fear and confusion among H-1B visa holders and prospective applicants, particularly within the Indian diaspora. More than 70% of H-1B visas issued in recent years have gone to workers from India, making this change particularly impactful for that community.

The new fee will be required for new H-1B petitions submitted by employers, with the intention of restricting the entry of certain nonimmigrant workers. This measure is part of a broader effort to curb abuses of the H-1B program that allegedly displace U.S. workers.

In a statement released by the White House on September 20, the administration outlined the specifics of the executive order. It restricts the entry of nonimmigrant workers in specialty occupations unless their petitions are accompanied by the $100,000 fee. The Secretary of Homeland Security has been directed to deny approvals for petitions from individuals currently outside the U.S. that do not include this payment, although exemptions may be granted on a case-by-case basis if deemed in the national interest.

Employers will be required to maintain documentation of the payment, which will be verified during the petition process by the Secretary of State. The Departments of State and Homeland Security will deny entry to individuals who do not meet the payment requirement and will take necessary steps to implement the proclamation.

The order also mandates that the Departments of Labor and Homeland Security collaborate on guidance related to verification, enforcement, audits, and penalties. Additionally, the Secretary of Labor has been instructed to revise the prevailing wage levels for the H-1B program, while the Secretary of Homeland Security will prioritize high-skilled, high-paid H-1B workers.

The White House’s statement emphasized the administration’s concern that American workers are being replaced by lower-paid foreign labor. It noted that the share of IT workers holding H-1B visas has increased from 32% in fiscal year 2003 to over 65% in recent years. The administration cited specific instances of companies laying off American employees while simultaneously hiring H-1B workers, further fueling the narrative that the program is being abused.

In response to the announcement, immigration lawyers and advocates have organized webinars and disseminated information to clarify the implications of the new fee. Many companies have advised their H-1B employees to avoid international travel and to exercise caution when considering travel plans.

According to White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt, the $100,000 fee will apply only to new H-1B applicants and will be charged per petition. It will not affect existing visa holders who are re-entering the country. Leavitt clarified that this fee is a one-time charge associated with the petition for a skilled worker and is not an annual fee.

Current H-1B visa holders outside the U.S. will not be required to pay the new fee to re-enter the country. Leavitt reassured that these visa holders can travel as they normally would, and the new fee will only apply to the upcoming H-1B lottery round, not to renewals or current visa holders.

Immigration attorney Sweta Khandelwal confirmed that the policy specifically targets individuals outside the U.S. at the time of entry. While current H-1B holders are not directly affected, their international travel may be impacted, and they are advised to avoid unnecessary trips abroad. The policy is set to remain in effect for 12 months, through September 21, 2026, unless extended.

Khandelwal noted that employers must document the $100,000 payment and provide proof during the petition process. The Departments of State and Homeland Security will work together to ensure that visas and entry are denied if the required payment is not made. However, there is currently uncertainty regarding how the Department of State will process the payment, even if employers are willing to comply.

As the situation develops, the Departments of Homeland Security, State, and Labor are expected to issue detailed guidance and initiate rulemaking on wage levels and prioritization standards. Legal challenges to the new fee are anticipated as early as September 22, 2025, according to Khandelwal.

To help the community navigate these changes, the Foundation for India and Indian Diasporic Studies (FIIDS) is hosting an online event featuring CPA and Attorney Neeraj Bhatia on September 22 at 9 p.m. EST (6 p.m. PST) to discuss the implications of the new visa fee.

For those interested in attending, registration is available at: http://tiny.cc/FIIDS-Online-RSVP.

Source: Original article

Indian Americans Celebrate Professor Jagmohan Singh’s Efforts to Preserve Bhagat Singh’s Legacy

Over 80 Indian Americans gathered at MINT Restaurant to honor Professor Jagmohan Singh, nephew of revolutionary Bhagat Singh, celebrating his legacy and the ongoing impact of his ideals.

More than 80 distinguished Indian Americans convened at MINT Restaurant to pay tribute to Professor Jagmohan Singh, the nephew of the legendary freedom fighter Shaheed Bhagat Singh. Bhagat Singh is revered for his courageous challenge against British colonial rule in India and has inspired countless individuals in their quest for independence.

The event was hosted by Varinder Bhalla, Chairman and Founder of the Coalition of Indian American Associations of New York (CIONY), with support from the American Punjabi Society. This gathering served as a poignant reminder of Bhagat Singh’s enduring legacy and the values he championed.

The evening commenced with a short video that showcased Bhagat Singh’s life and contributions. Originally produced in 2010 by Dr. Riti Sunshine Bhalla during her high school years, the video was scripted and produced by Varinder Bhalla. It has since been broadcast across various channels in the United States and Europe, featuring appearances from U.S. Congress members, Senators, and Governors, which underscored its historical significance.

Harry Singh Bolla, an event sponsor from a village near Bhagat Singh’s ancestral home, delivered a heartfelt keynote address. He spoke about how Bhagat Singh’s legacy has profoundly influenced his own life, emphasizing the revolutionary’s impact on the Indian American community.

Professor Jagmohan Singh, the son of Bhagat Singh’s younger sister Bibi Amar Kaur, addressed the audience with a deeply personal account of his lifelong commitment to preserving his uncle’s ideals. He articulated how Bhagat Singh’s story continues to resonate with and inspire new generations.

During his speech, Professor Singh reflected on his encounters with several of Bhagat Singh’s close associates who fought for India’s freedom. He shared emotional memories of Bhagat Singh’s final days, including intimate conversations with his parents and the remarkable courage his uncle displayed as he faced execution.

In a poignant revelation, Professor Singh recounted his mother’s imprisonment for her active participation in the independence movement. He shared how, as a one-year-old, he spent a year in jail with her, illustrating the personal sacrifices made by his family in the struggle for freedom.

The event concluded with an engaging question-and-answer session led by Varinder Bhalla. Among the most touching moments was when Professor Singh described Bhagat Singh’s reflections during his final hours, including the ideological differences he had with his father, who had sought clemency for him. These insights left the audience feeling inspired and profoundly moved.

As the evening drew to a close, the attendees were reminded of the importance of preserving the legacy of Bhagat Singh and the ideals he stood for, ensuring that his contributions to the fight for independence continue to inspire future generations.

Source: Original article

Palakkad MLA Rahul Mamkootathil Visits Constituency Amid Misconduct Allegations

Suspended Congress MLA Rahul Mamkootathil visited his constituency in Palakkad, Kerala, amid ongoing sexual misconduct allegations and following his party’s decision to suspend him.

Palakkad (Kerala) — Suspended Congress MLA Rahul Mamkootathil made a visit to his constituency in Palakkad on Wednesday, September 24, amidst serious accusations of sexual misconduct. His visit marked his return to the area after a period of absence following the allegations, which led to his suspension from the Congress party.

During his visit, Mamkootathil opened his MLA office, where a significant police presence was established for security. He also took the time to pay his respects to the family of a recently deceased Congress worker, offering condolences during this difficult time.

Senior Congress leader Ramesh Chennithala addressed the situation, confirming that the decision to suspend Mamkootathil was made collectively within the party. “Yes, it was a collective decision, that’s a fact. Now the KPCC president has suspended him, so let us wait for some time before deciding further,” Chennithala stated.

Following the allegations, Mamkootathil had largely remained at his residence in Adoor. However, he made a notable appearance at the Kerala Assembly last week, which was his first public engagement since his suspension. In the Assembly, he was seated away from the United Democratic Front (UDF) bloc, a request made by Opposition Leader V D Satheesan due to the ongoing allegations against him.

Despite the serious nature of the accusations, Mamkootathil expressed his unwavering commitment to the Congress party. He stated, “I have never defied the leadership or the party. I have always worked in complete obedience to party decisions and never attempted to violate them. I know how a suspended member should conduct himself. I have not personally tried to meet any leader. On the very day the allegation came, I openly addressed the media in detail.”

He also commented on the ongoing inquiry into the allegations, saying, “An inquiry is underway, and I will not comment on its technical aspects. I am certain I will not get any special favour from the investigation, because it is the very government that stands against me, which is conducting it. Let the probe proceed.”

Mamkootathil reiterated his loyalty to the Congress party, asserting, “If there is anything against me, let the truth come out. I will remain a Congress worker until my last breath.”

As the situation develops, the political implications of these allegations and Mamkootathil’s future within the party remain uncertain.

Source: Original article

SP Leader Azam Khan Expresses Gratitude After Release from Sitapur Jail

Azam Khan, a prominent leader of the Samajwadi Party, expressed gratitude to his supporters upon his release from Sitapur Jail after nearly two years behind bars.

Shahjahanpur (Uttar Pradesh) [India], September 23 (ANI) — Azam Khan, a prominent leader of the Samajwadi Party, walked out of Sitapur Jail on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, after spending nearly two years incarcerated.

As he emerged from the facility, Khan expressed heartfelt gratitude to his supporters, stating, “Thanks to everyone. My blessings to all who supported me.”

Khan’s imprisonment stemmed from his involvement in the Quality Bar land encroachment case. He was granted bail by the Allahabad High Court in May of this year, paving the way for his release.

In response to speculation regarding a potential alliance with the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), Khan clarified, “This can be explained only by those who are making the speculations. I did not meet anyone in jail. I was not allowed to make a phone call. So, I have been completely out of touch for five years.”

Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav welcomed Khan’s release, promising to withdraw all “false” cases against him if the party regains power in Uttar Pradesh.

Shivpal Singh Yadav, an SP MLA who was present to receive Khan, criticized the Yogi Adityanath government, alleging that Khan had been “framed” in false cases. He welcomed the court’s decision to grant bail, stating, “Azam Khan was framed by the government in false cases. However, the court has granted him bail and has provided relief to him in cases. I welcome this decision. I welcome the Supreme Court and the High Court. Many false cases were filed against him. The Samajwadi Party stands beside him.”

Earlier, the Allahabad High Court had granted bail to former Uttar Pradesh Minister Mohammad Azam Khan in the Quality Bar land case. Khan’s advocate, Mohammad Khalid, indicated that with this bail, there were no pending cases that would keep him in jail, suggesting that his release was imminent.

Khalid stated, “So, there’s no pending case that would keep him in jail. As of today, bail has been granted in all the cases. This process may take two to three days. As of now, there are no other pending cases.”

Source: Original article

India Reacts to Increased H-1B Visa Fees by U.S. Government

The U.S. government’s recent announcement of a $100,000 fee hike on H-1B visa petitions has sparked widespread anxiety among tech professionals in both the U.S. and India.

In a significant move, the U.S. government has announced a steep $100,000 fee increase on H-1B visa petitions, causing a wave of anxiety among tech professionals across the country. As news of the hike spread, many individuals began to assess the potential impact on their careers and futures.

Thousands of miles away in India, families of H-1B visa holders found themselves in a state of panic, grappling with uncertainty regarding travel plans, financial commitments, and the futures of their loved ones residing in the U.S. The announcement has transformed an already high-stakes application process into a source of overwhelming stress, with phones, laptops, and WhatsApp threads buzzing with activity around the clock.

Shubra Singh, a biotech professional currently in the U.S., experienced the tension firsthand during a Saturday night dinner in a Pittsburgh bar. Surrounded by eight Indian friends, all tech professionals on H-1B visas, she witnessed their focus shift entirely to their phones as they anxiously tracked updates on President Donald Trump’s decision regarding the fee increase. What began as a casual evening quickly turned tense, with conversations drowned out by notifications and urgent searches for clarity.

“Our families are sharing all kinds of articles on the H-1B situation,” Singh noted, highlighting the palpable anxiety among her peers. According to reports, Indians constitute the largest group of H-1B visa holders in the U.S., making up approximately 71%, while Chinese nationals account for about 11.7%. The recent proclamation to raise H-1B fees has left many questioning their employment prospects and reconsidering their plans in the U.S.

The impact of the fee hike was felt in India’s stock market as shares of major IT firms declined following the announcement. Investors reacted by offloading shares of leading IT outsourcing companies, including Infosys, Tech Mahindra, Wipro, HCL Technologies, and Tata Consultancy Services. Smaller and mid-sized firms, such as Persistent Systems, Coforge, Mphasis, Firstsource Solutions, and Cyient, also experienced stock price drops ranging from 1.7% to 4.2% during early trading in London.

Analysts are concerned that the $100,000 fee could deter Indian students from pursuing opportunities in the U.S. JPMorgan’s Toshi Jain remarked that this steep fee could act as a new “tax” on securing employment after graduation. Prashanth Prakash, a partner at the Indian venture capital firm Accel, echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the growing challenges for Indian students aspiring to study and work in the U.S.

Meanwhile, panic ensued on an India-bound Emirates flight shortly after the announcement. At San Francisco International Airport, several Indian passengers disembarked just before takeoff, leading to a three-hour delay. Videos posted on social media captured the chaotic scene, with travelers anxiously scrolling through their phones and standing in the aisles, uncertain about their ability to return to the U.S.

The captain of the Emirates flight addressed passengers, acknowledging the unprecedented circumstances and allowing those who wished to leave the aircraft to do so. “Ladies and gentlemen, it’s the captain speaking. Due to the current circumstances, obviously, that are unprecedented for us here at Emirates, we are aware that a number of passengers do not wish to travel with us, and that’s perfectly fine,” he stated.

Describing the situation as chaotic, a passenger shared their experience on Instagram, noting that panic had spread among Indian travelers, prompting some to choose to leave the plane. “It was complete chaos for Emirates passengers at San Francisco Airport this Friday morning,” the user wrote, detailing how they had been stranded for over three hours, waiting for the flight to depart.

In explaining the rationale behind the H-1B visa fee increase, President Trump stated that the program was intended to bring “temporary workers into the U.S. to perform additive, high-skilled functions,” but he claimed it had been exploited to replace American workers with lower-paid, lower-skilled labor.

As the implications of this fee hike continue to unfold, both tech professionals in the U.S. and their families in India are left grappling with uncertainty about their futures.

Source: Original article

Congress CWC Meeting in Bihar on September 24 to Address Election Concerns

The Congress party will convene its working committee in Bihar on September 24 to address concerns over alleged vote theft and rising crime rates ahead of the upcoming elections.

Patna (Bihar) [India], September 22 (ANI) – The Congress party is scheduled to hold its working committee meeting in poll-bound Bihar on September 24 (Wednesday). This significant gathering will take place at Sadaqat Ashram, the state party headquarters in Patna.

Key party leaders are expected to attend the Congress Working Committee (CWC) meeting, including party president Mallikarjun Kharge, Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, Wayanad MP Priyanka Gandhi, state party president Rajesh Ram, Bihar in-charge Krishna Allavaru, and state Legislative Party leader Shakeel Ahmed Khan.

Krishna Allavaru, the party’s state in-charge, announced the CWC meeting during a press conference on Monday. He emphasized that the agenda will cover various pressing issues, including allegations of ‘vote chori’ (vote theft), as well as rising crime, unemployment, and inflation affecting the state.

“Congress will definitely talk about Bihar in Bihar, but also will talk about the nation in the state. There are many issues to be addressed in Bihar, including unemployment, inflation, increasing crime, and crimes against women,” Allavaru stated. He also criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi, claiming that the PM is “not interested” in addressing the problems faced by the people.

“Modi is not interested in finding solutions to these problems even after 11 years. People should understand. Modi ji is like a student who does not believe in getting marks through studying and working hard. Rather, he is like a student who looks to cheat,” he added.

In a related development, Congress MP Akhilesh Prasad Singh expressed optimism about finalizing seat-sharing arrangements for the upcoming Bihar elections shortly after the CWC meeting. Singh highlighted the unity among alliance partners and their collective aim of defeating the BJP and Nitish Kumar’s coalition.

“It will happen quickly after CWC. There is no difficulty; all parties are well-assured. Tejashwi Yadav is the biggest face for CM. The priority is to defeat the BJP and Nitish Kumar’s alliance,” Singh remarked.

Meanwhile, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav indicated that discussions regarding seat-sharing within the Mahagathbandhan are nearing completion, with announcements expected soon.

The Bihar Assembly elections are anticipated to take place later in October or November, although the Election Commission of India (ECI) has yet to announce an official date.

As the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), comprising the BJP, JD(U), and LJP, seeks to maintain its position in Bihar, the INDIA bloc, which includes the RJD, Congress, and left parties, is determined to unseat Nitish Kumar.

Currently, the Bihar Assembly consists of 243 members, with the NDA holding 131 seats. The BJP has 80 MLAs, JD(U) has 45, HAM(S) has 4, and they are supported by 2 Independent candidates.

Source: Original article

Mithun Manhas Nominates for BCCI President Position Amid Growing Interest

Former Delhi captain Mithun Manhas has officially submitted his nomination for the position of BCCI president at the Board’s headquarters in Mumbai.

On Sunday, Mithun Manhas, a former captain of the Delhi cricket team, took a significant step in his cricketing career by filing his nomination for the prestigious position of president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).

The nomination was submitted at the BCCI headquarters located in Mumbai, marking an important moment in the lead-up to the election. Manhas ensured that his nomination was filed ahead of the deadline, which was set for later that afternoon.

As a prominent figure in Indian cricket, Manhas’s candidacy is expected to draw attention from various stakeholders within the cricketing community. His experience as a player and captain in domestic cricket positions him as a noteworthy contender for the role.

The BCCI presidency is a highly sought-after position, overseeing the governance and administration of cricket in India. With the upcoming elections, the cricketing fraternity is keenly observing the developments surrounding the nominations and potential candidates.

Manhas’s nomination reflects his ambition to contribute to the sport at a higher level, and it will be interesting to see how his campaign unfolds in the coming days.

According to NDTV, the election process will continue to attract significant interest as various candidates emerge and present their visions for the future of Indian cricket.

Source: Original article

Chuck Schumer Suggests Epstein May Have Influenced Kimmel’s Show Cancellation

Senator Chuck Schumer raised questions about the motivations behind Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show cancellation, suggesting it may be linked to Kimmel’s comments on the Jeffrey Epstein case.

Senator Chuck Schumer has suggested that comments made by Jimmy Kimmel regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case may have played a role in the abrupt cancellation of Kimmel’s late-night talk show. This speculation follows the announcement that Disney would be pulling Kimmel’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” from its ABC affiliates.

In a post on social media platform X, Schumer questioned whether “Epstein” was “the real reason” for Kimmel’s removal from the airwaves. He included a screenshot of a New York Times article discussing how popular late-night hosts, including Kimmel, have utilized newly released Epstein documents to critique former President Donald Trump and his alleged connections to the disgraced financier. Schumer’s post read, “IS EPSTEIN THE REAL REASON TRUMP HAD KIMMEL CANCELED?!”

Fox News Digital reached out to Schumer’s representatives for clarification on his comments but did not receive a response prior to publication.

The cancellation of Kimmel’s show was announced by Nexstar Media Group, which operates numerous television stations. The company stated that it would replace Kimmel’s program with other content “for the foreseeable future” due to his remarks about Charlie Kirk, a conservative commentator. Nexstar’s broadcasting chief, Andrew Alford, described Kimmel’s comments as “offensive and insensitive” during a critical time in the nation’s political discourse. He emphasized that continuing to air Kimmel’s show did not align with the values of the local communities served by Nexstar.

Alford further explained that the decision to preempt Kimmel’s show was made in the interest of fostering respectful and constructive dialogue within the community.

Former President Trump weighed in on the cancellation during a press conference in the United Kingdom, attributing Kimmel’s departure to poor ratings. He stated, “Jimmy Kimmel was fired ’cause he had bad ratings more than anything else, and he said a horrible thing about a great gentleman known as Charlie Kirk.” Trump characterized Kimmel as lacking talent and suggested that he should have been let go long ago.

In a post on his platform, Truth Social, Trump referred to the cancellation as “great news for America.” Kimmel’s controversial comments reportedly stemmed from a recent episode of his show, in which he accused conservatives of attempting to politicize the murder of Charlie Kirk by linking it to left-wing ideology. Kimmel remarked, “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them.”

Following the announcement of Kimmel’s cancellation, Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr commended local television stations for prioritizing the interests of their communities in their programming decisions.

As the situation continues to unfold, the implications of Kimmel’s comments and the subsequent cancellation remain a topic of discussion among political figures and media analysts alike.

Source: Original article

S.I.R. Initiative Aims to Strengthen India’s Sovereignty and Security

Congress leader Pawan Khera’s recent criticisms of the Special Intensive Revision (S.I.R) process in Bihar have sparked a debate about electoral integrity and the preservation of India’s sovereignty.

In a recent attack on the Election Commission of India (ECI), Congress leader Pawan Khera accused the body of undermining the democratic process through its handling of the Special Intensive Revision (S.I.R) in Bihar. Khera claimed that the ECI has been disseminating misleading information, stating that no complaints have been lodged by political parties regarding the S.I.R. He asserted that the Congress Party has submitted 89 lakh complaints about irregularities, only to have these complaints dismissed by the ECI. According to Khera, the ECI informed Congress representatives that only individual complaints would be accepted, not those from political parties.

Khera’s allegations included claims of duplicate entries on the electoral rolls and a demand for the S.I.R to be re-conducted. This rhetoric aligns with a broader strategy employed by the Congress Party, led by Rahul Gandhi, characterized by sensational accusations against the ECI that often lack substantial evidence.

In response to Khera’s assertions, the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) of Bihar provided a detailed rebuttal, addressing each of the Congress leader’s points. The CEO noted that District Congress Committee presidents had submitted letters to District Election Officers alleging the deletion of approximately 89 lakh names from the electoral rolls. However, the ECI clarified that objections to deletions must adhere to specific rules outlined in the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, and the Representation of the People Act, 1950.

The Supreme Court, in an interim order dated August 22, 2025, reinforced that objections from political parties must be submitted in the prescribed format to the relevant Electoral Registration Officer. As the objections submitted by the Congress were not compliant with these requirements, they were forwarded to the appropriate authorities for action.

Regarding allegations of duplicate voters, the Bihar CEO’s office stated that the current draft rolls are still under scrutiny and have not yet been finalized. The ECI highlighted that, unlike the Congress Party, its allies, the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (CPI-ML), had adhered to the rules, with the RJD filing ten claims through valid Booth-Level Agents (BLAs) and the CPI-ML submitting 15 claims for inclusion and 103 objections for exclusion as of August 31, 2025.

This situation underscores a perception that the Congress Party is more focused on making unsubstantiated claims than on addressing electoral integrity in a responsible manner. The party’s objections appear to be more about political maneuvering than genuine concerns for the electoral process.

According to Article 326 of the Indian Constitution, every citizen aged 18 or older is entitled to be registered as a voter. Article 324 establishes the ECI’s authority over the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of elections. The ECI is empowered by Section 21 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, to maintain accurate electoral rolls and make necessary revisions.

A Special Intensive Revision (S.I.R) differs from a summary revision, which updates existing data prior to elections. The S.I.R is intended to create a fresh electoral roll, addressing issues such as duplicate entries that have arisen due to urbanization and migration over the past two decades.

S.Y. Quraishi, a former Chief Election Commissioner, has commented on the controversy surrounding the Bihar S.I.R in various op-eds and television interviews. In an op-ed published on August 20, Quraishi praised the ECI for its efforts but called for greater transparency. He noted that while the ECI has provided detailed information about deletions, it has not disclosed the number of new voters added after this clean-up, which he deemed a significant omission.

Quraishi emphasized that public access to electoral information is crucial for democratic accountability. He argued that for an organization with the ECI’s reputation, a return to full transparency is essential for maintaining public trust in the electoral process.

On September 1, the ECI informed the Supreme Court that it had received 1,532,438 applications for first-time inclusion in the electoral roll from eligible citizens aged 18 and older. Quraishi also raised questions about the necessity of conducting a Special Intensive Revision instead of a Summary Revision, referencing an ECI order from June 24, 2025, which outlined the need for the S.I.R due to significant changes in the electoral landscape.

The S.I.R is fundamentally an exercise in sovereignty, aimed at ensuring that only legitimate citizens are included in the electoral rolls while excluding illegal immigrants. This issue is particularly pressing in regions bordering Bangladesh, such as Assam and West Bengal, and to a lesser extent, Bihar. Areas in Bihar with high Muslim populations have seen significant growth rates, raising concerns about the potential impact of illegal immigration on the electoral process.

During the S.I.R process, districts in Bihar have experienced a surge in applications for residential certificates. Bihar’s Deputy Chief Minister, Samrat Choudhary, expressed concerns that many applicants may be immigrants from neighboring countries, including Bangladesh, Nepal, and Bhutan.

The S.I.R is a process sanctioned by Parliament under the Representation of the People Act, 1950, designed to maintain accurate electoral rolls and ensure that only legitimate Indian citizens participate in elections. Oversight by the Supreme Court further enhances the transparency and compliance of this process. While the S.I.R may have its challenges, it is crucial for safeguarding the integrity of India’s democratic framework.

Efforts by the opposition and certain activists to undermine the S.I.R through unfounded allegations not only threaten the democratic process but may also hint at a more insidious agenda. The question remains whether these actions are an attempt to preserve a vote bank that has been sustained through years of facilitating illegal immigration.

Source: Original article

Rubio Cautions Brazil on U.S. Response Following Bolsonaro’s Coup Conviction

The U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has warned of a potential U.S. response following the conviction of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro for plotting a coup.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced on Thursday that the United States would take action in response to the conviction of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who was found guilty of plotting a coup to retain power after losing the 2022 election. While Rubio did not specify the nature of the U.S. response, he expressed strong disapproval of the Brazilian judicial proceedings against Bolsonaro.

In a post on X, Rubio criticized what he described as “political persecutions” by Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, labeling the ruling against Bolsonaro as unjust. “The United States will respond accordingly to this witch hunt,” he stated, indicating that the U.S. government would not remain passive in the face of what he perceives as a violation of democratic principles.

Brazil’s Foreign Ministry reacted sharply to Rubio’s comments, asserting that they constituted a threat to Brazilian sovereignty and disregarded the facts surrounding the case. The ministry emphasized that Brazilian democracy would not be intimidated by external pressures.

On Thursday, Bolsonaro was sentenced to 27 years and three months in prison after being convicted by Brazil’s Supreme Court. The charges against him included plotting a coup to prevent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva from assuming office in January 2023. Bolsonaro, who served as president from 2019 to 2022, was a close ally of former U.S. President Donald Trump.

Trump, commenting on the situation, expressed surprise at Bolsonaro’s conviction, likening it to his own legal challenges. “I thought he was a good president of Brazil,” Trump said, adding that he was taken aback by the developments. He also criticized the Brazilian judicial system, suggesting that it was politically motivated.

In response to the ongoing situation, Rubio has previously announced visa revocations for Justice de Moraes and his associates. This action followed the issuance of search warrants and restraining orders against Bolsonaro, which Rubio characterized as part of a “political witch hunt.” The U.S. Treasury Department has also sanctioned de Moraes, citing allegations of arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppression of free speech.

Eduardo Bolsonaro, the former president’s son and a Brazilian Congressman, indicated that he expects further U.S. sanctions against Brazilian justices involved in the case. He warned that justices who voted to convict his father could face repercussions under the Magnitsky Act, a law previously utilized by the Trump administration against de Moraes. “If these Supreme Court justices keep following Moraes, they also run the risk of facing the same sanction,” he stated.

The situation continues to evolve, with both U.S. and Brazilian officials closely monitoring the implications of Bolsonaro’s conviction and the potential for increased tensions between the two nations.

Source: Original article

-+=