Category: Immigration

Indian Diaspora Faces Significant Challenges Amid Global Unrest

Staff ReporterImmigration, Editorial/Opinion 0

The Indian diaspora is facing unprecedented challenges, marked by rising hostility and backlash in Western nations, necessitating a serious examination of its evolving narrative and future strategies.

New Delhi: Since December 2024, I have cautioned that a moment of reckoning is approaching for the Indian diaspora, often celebrated as one of the great success stories of the country. Once regarded as a model minority globally, this community is now confronting perplexing and unprecedented attacks, including mass protests in Australia and Ireland, which call for curbing immigration from India.

In the United States, this backlash has been fueled, in part, by comments from former President Donald Trump and some members of his administration regarding trade tariffs. These remarks have resonated with significant segments of the so-called MAGA base. However, it would be unwise to dismiss this as merely a fringe reaction or conspiracy theory.

Since the early 19th century, when Indians first began migrating to America, this backlash represents one of the most vicious emerging challenges for a community that contributes over $100 billion annually to India’s economy. It is essential to take these developments seriously and address the root causes before they undermine the remarkable narrative of Indian immigration.

As a dark cloud looms over the unprecedented global mobility and interconnectedness of recent decades, the narrative surrounding the Indian diaspora, particularly in Western nations such as the United States, Ireland, and Australia, is souring dramatically. Once celebrated for its high levels of education, professional achievement, and economic prosperity, the community now faces a troubling counter-narrative.

A rising tide of protests, physical attacks, and vitriolic online abuse indicates a significant and alarming shift in perception. This article will explore the complex reasons behind this backlash, arguing that the very success of the Indian diaspora, combined with economic anxieties, cultural shifts, and geopolitical transformations, has ironically made it a target of resentment and hostility.

For decades, the story of Indian immigrants in the West has been framed as a testament to hard work and determination. Arriving in often unfamiliar and challenging environments, they have not only integrated but excelled, becoming one of the most economically successful communities in these nations. Their contributions are particularly notable in fields such as medicine, engineering, information technology, and finance.

This success is not merely anecdotal; it is supported by stark economic data. In the United States, for example, Indian Americans boast the highest median household income of any ethnic group. This economic prowess is increasingly reflected in leadership positions, with a growing number of Indian-origin individuals ascending to C-suite roles in major multinational corporations. Figures like Satya Nadella at Microsoft and Sundar Pichai at Alphabet have become global symbols of this incredible success story.

However, this very visibility and success have, in a cruel twist of fate, sown the seeds of a backlash. In a climate of growing economic inequality and social anxiety in many Western nations, the conspicuous success of a minority group can easily become a focal point for resentment. The narrative of the “model minority,” once a badge of honour, is now being weaponized to create a damaging dichotomy, pitting successful Indian immigrants against other minority groups and even the white working class. The talents and economic success of Indians, once celebrated as contributions to their adopted homelands, are now reframed as threats, a sentiment amplified by populist politicians and media outlets.

This resentment manifests in tangible and dangerous ways. In Australia, anti-immigration protests have specifically targeted Indians. In Ireland, a country historically known for its warmth, a spate of violent and unprovoked attacks against members of the Indian community has instilled a palpable sense of fear. In the United States, while violence may be less overt, hostility is evident in political discourse and online platforms, which have become breeding grounds for anti-Indian sentiment, often revolving around the trope of Indians “stealing” jobs.

The H1-B visa program in the United States serves as a lightning rod for much of this animosity. Designed to allow American companies to hire highly skilled foreign workers, it has faced accusations of misuse. Some employers have been accused of using the program to replace American workers with cheaper foreign labor, and a minority of Indian employees have been complicit in a system perceived to undercut local wages and opportunities. While the majority of H1-B visa holders are highly skilled professionals who significantly contribute to the American economy, the actions of a few have tarnished the reputation of the entire community.

The abuse of the H1-B visa system has provided a potent narrative for those who wish to portray Indian immigrants not as assets but as economic mercenaries. This combination of economic success and the perception of being a threat has drawn unsettling parallels between the contemporary experience of Indians in some parts of the world and the historical experiences of Jewish people. Some argue that Indians are becoming “Jew adjacent,” resented for their success, adaptability, and perceived insularity. Just as Jewish people were historically resented for their economic success, Indians now face a similar brand of envy-fueled animosity.

The “model minority” label, akin to stereotypes used against Jewish people, creates a caricature of a community viewed as both hyper-successful and insular, further isolating them from the broader population.

This troubling trend is compounded by India’s rising stature on the global stage. As India’s economy grows and its geopolitical influence expands, its citizens can no longer be viewed through the patronizing lens of the “third world.” They are increasingly seen as representatives of a powerful nation challenging the established global order. This shift in perception impacts how Indian immigrants are viewed in the West; they are no longer seen as grateful newcomers but as representatives of a competitive and assertive nation. This geopolitical subtext adds another layer to the resentment, transforming economic anxiety into a form of quasi-nationalistic animosity.

Faced with this growing hostility, what is the way forward? Paradoxically, the solution may not be less immigration, but more. The current wave of anti-Indian sentiment is largely fueled by ignorance and caricature. The most effective way to combat these negative stereotypes is through greater cultural exchange and understanding. More immigration from India, particularly from a diverse cross-section of society, can help humanize the Indian diaspora in the eyes of the host population.

When immigrants are not just seen as doctors, engineers, and tech workers, but as artists, writers, musicians, and entrepreneurs, it becomes more difficult to reduce them to a monolithic and threatening stereotype. These new waves of immigrants can act as cultural ambassadors, sharing their stories and showcasing a modern, pluralistic, and dynamic India often absent from the headlines. By engaging with local communities and sharing their culture, they can build the bridges of understanding that are desperately needed.

This is not to suggest that immigration is a panacea for all the complex issues at play. Host nations must also address the underlying economic and social anxieties that make their populations susceptible to xenophobic rhetoric. However, in the long run, the most potent antidote to hate is understanding, and the most effective way to foster that understanding is through human connection.

Indians must also become more politically active in their adopted countries than ever before. The old model of “keeping your head down and working hard” is no longer sufficient. To push back against the negative storm that is set to increase, they must integrate into the political fabric of their adopted countries. It is not enough to make large donations to key political parties; it is time to support community members who will run for office at every level and represent the community in government. The success that Indian immigrants have achieved in business and rising to C-suite positions must now be replicated in politics, with strong ambitions to reach top policy and administration roles.

In July, I recommended a strategic widening of Indian immigration to countries like Japan, Russia, Israel, Scandinavia, and parts of Europe, which remain largely unaffected by the negativity spreading in places like America. It is also time to consider establishing institutions akin to the American Jewish Committee to provide support for Indians who feel imperiled or discriminated against.

It is crucial to remember that in recent years, Indians have been equated with racism through a narrative that blames the age-old Indian caste system for the ills of slavery and racial discrimination in America and Europe. This propaganda has dire social consequences, making it socially acceptable to attack a community that, despite making up only 1% of the U.S. population, contributes 6% of all taxes collected.

Thus, the Indian diaspora in the West finds itself at a crossroads. The success that was once a source of pride has now made it a target of resentment. The model minority label has transformed into a double-edged sword, and the rising power of India has added a new dimension to the challenges they face. The comparison to the historical experiences of Jewish people serves as a sobering reminder of the dangers of allowing prejudice to go unchecked.

The path forward is not to retreat into insularity but to double down on cultural exchange and engagement. By sharing their stories and showcasing the richness and diversity of their heritage, Indian immigrants can challenge the stereotypes and build a future where they are not just tolerated for their economic contributions but are truly valued as integral members of the societies they have chosen to call home.

Source: Original article

For Indian-American Sikhs in ICE Detention, Faith Offers Hope

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

Simran Singh’s weekly visits to the Mesa Verde ICE Detention Center provide Sikh detainees with essential articles of faith, fostering hope and connection amid their struggles for asylum in the U.S.

Every Thursday, 33-year-old insurance broker Simran Singh embarks on a mission from his home in Bakersfield, California. He fills his car with essential items, stopping at an Indian grocery store for Punjabi-language newspapers and then at a gurdwara to collect around 50 servings of prashad, a traditional sweet pudding made for devotees.

His destination is the Mesa Verde ICE Detention Center, a stark beige structure surrounded by metal fences topped with barbed wire. After checking in and receiving a visitor badge, Singh is escorted to the cafeteria, where he spends the next ninety minutes meeting with approximately sixty Sikh detainees. He distributes cloth dastaars, maalas (prayer beads), karas (metal bracelets), Nitnem Gutke (prayer books), and Punjabi newspapers, engaging in conversations that offer a sense of community and support.

In the midst of the despair surrounding asylum cases, transfers, and fears of deportation, the items Singh brings symbolize a glimmer of hope. “It is heartwarming to see,” Singh reflects. “Now they know that there is someone who knows they exist, that they’re not just a number in a facility.”

Singh’s initiative began in 2016, sparked by his curiosity while volunteering with a Sikh community organization to register voters at the gurdwara. With immigration a hot topic during Donald Trump’s first presidential campaign, he discovered the nearby detention center and decided to investigate. To his surprise, he found three Sikh detainees at Mesa Verde. After completing a volunteer course, he began visiting them regularly.

Over the next four years, Singh’s visits became a weekly routine, coinciding with a significant increase in the number of South Asian detainees, particularly Sikhs from India. Between 2016 and 2020, the number of Sikh detainees rose from three to 40, many detained immediately after crossing the border. This trend mirrored a rise in apprehensions of Indian nationals by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) during that period, peaking at 71,781 encounters in 2023.

Many of these individuals hail from Punjab, Haryana, and Gujarat, fleeing financial insecurity or political persecution. Their journeys to the U.S. often involve perilous travel by air, water, and foot, only to face detention upon arrival.

Language and cultural barriers further complicate the asylum process for South Asian immigrants. Fresno-based immigration attorney Deepak Singh Ahluwalia highlights the challenges posed by language discrepancies, noting that many Border Patrol officers lack the ability to communicate effectively with asylum-seekers. “The language barrier is huge, it’s immense,” he said. “In 10 years, I’ve met one CBP officer who spoke Punjabi!”

For Sikhs, the issue of their articles of faith, particularly turbans, has become contentious during border crossings. Harminder Singh, a 36-year-old Sikh truck driver, fled political persecution in Punjab in 2022. After a grueling four-month journey, he and his family were detained at the San Luis, Arizona border. Despite his pleas to keep his turban on, Border Patrol officers forced him to remove it, leading to a traumatic experience that left him feeling humiliated in front of his children.

After being separated from his family and suffering from physical distress, Harminder was released two days later, only to find himself without his turban. His experience is not isolated; reports indicate that at least 64 Sikh immigrants had their turbans confiscated at the Arizona border around August 2022. Following advocacy from civil rights groups, CBP issued guidance to prevent unnecessary confiscation of Sikh articles of faith, though reports have surfaced of continued issues.

Singh emphasizes the importance of providing detainees with their articles of faith, as many do not have access to them while in detention. The facility’s budget typically covers basic items like books and games, but often neglects the religious needs of detainees. To bridge this gap, Singh has relied on his network to source and deliver essential items.

He has successfully procured Nitnem Gutke, dastaars, karas, and maalas through various means, including donations from family members and local businesses. During his visits, he encourages detainees to share maalas with fellow inmates, fostering connections among individuals from diverse backgrounds.

In addition to delivering articles of faith, Singh has organized kirtan dewans—Sikh devotional concerts—at various ICE facilities, promoting cultural exchange and understanding among detainees. His efforts have expanded significantly, with Singh supplying thousands of religious items to 18 detention centers across multiple states since July 2025.

The COVID-19 pandemic temporarily halted Singh’s visits, but he resumed them in June 2025, witnessing a surge in detainee numbers as restrictions lifted. On a recent visit, he met with 65 South Asian detainees, the highest number he has encountered to date, with more than half identifying as Sikh.

Singh notes a troubling trend: many detainees are now being apprehended during routine ICE check-ins rather than immediately after crossing the border. “They don’t want to miss these visits, so ICE is having these immigrants walk into what ends up being a trap,” he explains.

For many detainees, Singh serves as their only connection to the outside world. Phone calls to family are prohibitively expensive, and the emotional toll of detention is profound. During his visits, detainees often share their stories of hardship and uncertainty, revealing the psychological strain of their circumstances.

Singh acknowledges the difficulty of not knowing the outcomes of the detainees he meets. “I just show up and either they’re going to be there or they’re not going to be there. I don’t get that closure or find out what happens once they’re gone,” he says.

As the number of detainees at the Mesa Verde Detention Center continues to rise, Singh remains committed to providing support and resources to those in need. “It’s a big morale booster,” he states. “They have a way to keep their identity in a place where everyone’s wearing the same clothes, waking up at the same time, following the same schedule, day in, day out for months and years at a time. It’s like putting a bandage on something that requires a major operation.”

Source: Original article

Georgia Worksite Raid Highlights Impact of Trump’s Immigration Policies

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

On September 4, a massive immigration raid at a Hyundai plant in Georgia resulted in the detention of at least 475 workers, highlighting the chaos stemming from the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

On September 4, law enforcement agents from various state and federal agencies, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), conducted a sweeping immigration raid at a Hyundai manufacturing facility in southeastern Georgia. This operation reportedly led to the detention of at least 475 workers, many of whom were South Korean nationals, including some individuals with legal status. This event marks the largest worksite raid in recent history.

In the aftermath of the raid, the American Immigration Council issued a statement addressing the implications of such actions. Michelle Lapointe, the legal director at the American Immigration Council, who is based in the Atlanta area, emphasized the negative impact of these raids on communities and families.

“These raids don’t make anyone safer. They terrorize workers, destabilize communities, and push families into chaos,” Lapointe stated. “This historic raid may make dramatic headlines, but it does nothing to fix the problems in our broken immigration system: a lack of legal pathways and a misguided focus on punishing workers and families who pose no threat to our communities. Raiding worksites isn’t reform; it’s political theater at the expense of families, communities, and our economy.”

Nan Wu, the director of research at the American Immigration Council, also spoke about the broader implications of such raids. “Immigrant workers are the backbone of our economy, filling critical labor gaps in manufacturing and beyond. Nationwide, 5.7% of manufacturing workers are undocumented, and here in Georgia, they make up 6.7% of that workforce,” Wu noted. “Raiding worksites instead of fixing our pathways to legal employment is cruel, wasteful, and deeply shortsighted. The chilling effect of these raids will make it less likely that people will show up to work, deepening labor shortages and hitting businesses hard at an already precarious economic moment.”

Experts from the American Immigration Council are available to discuss why worksite raids are counterproductive and harmful, as well as to propose smarter, more effective immigration solutions.

Source: Original article

What H-1B Visa Holders Should Do If They Receive a Notice to Appear

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Visa 0

Laid-off H-1B visa holders in the U.S. face new challenges as Notices to Appear in immigration court are issued before the grace period ends, creating uncertainty for many families.

H-1B visa holders who lose their jobs and receive a Notice to Appear (NTA) in immigration court are navigating a complex and evolving legal landscape. Typically, laid-off H-1B workers are granted a 60-day grace period to secure new employment or change their visa status. However, recent reports indicate a troubling trend: NTAs are being issued before this grace period has expired, leading to increased anxiety and uncertainty for many visa holders and their families.

According to the Pew Research Center, approximately 400,000 H-1B visas were approved in 2024, with 73% of those going to workers from India. Most of these visas are renewals, highlighting the significant reliance on this visa category among Indian nationals.

To gain insight into the current situation, India Currents spoke with Sameer Khedekar, Founder and Managing Attorney at Vanguard Visa Law in California. The following discussion, lightly edited for clarity, sheds light on the recent changes affecting H-1B visa holders.

Sameer began by outlining the broader implications of recent changes in the H-1B visa process. He noted that a February memo from USCIS indicated that NTAs would be issued to anyone lacking lawful status in the U.S. Initially, this seemed reasonable, but by July, reports emerged of H-1B workers being laid off and subsequently receiving NTAs.

When an H-1B worker leaves their job, whether through a layoff or voluntarily, the employer is required to notify USCIS. This notification triggers the issuance of an NTA, regardless of the employee’s subsequent actions to maintain their status, such as applying for a new job or changing their visa status.

Historically, H-1B holders have enjoyed a 60-day grace period to seek new employment or change their status. This grace period has been uniformly granted since its implementation in 2016. However, the current administration’s approach appears to be eroding this safety net, as NTAs are being issued without consideration of the grace period.

Sameer explained that when an H-1B holder leaves their employer, the withdrawal of their H-1B status often triggers an automatic NTA. This occurs regardless of whether the individual has taken steps to apply for a new H-1B, H-4, or B-1/B-2 visa. Consequently, many individuals find themselves in immigration court, even when they have acted to preserve their status.

While some cases have been dismissed in court due to applicants demonstrating that they maintained their status, the outcomes can vary significantly depending on the judge and the court. The recent wave of layoffs from major companies like Microsoft and Intel has compounded the issue, creating chaos for many H-1B holders.

For those facing layoffs, it is crucial to understand the timing of when their employer will withdraw their H-1B status. Sameer recommended that employees proactively discuss with their employers the possibility of delaying the withdrawal until after the grace period has ended. This conversation, while potentially awkward, is essential given the current climate.

Sameer also highlighted the emotional toll this situation takes on families, particularly those who have lived in the U.S. for many years. The fear of separation due to immigration proceedings is palpable, especially among families with children who have grown up in the U.S.

In terms of legal options, Sameer emphasized the importance of taking action during the grace period. If a visa holder is unable to secure employment within the 60-day window, leaving the country before an NTA is issued is the safest course of action. This approach allows for a case dismissal if the individual departs before the NTA is formally issued.

For those who do receive an NTA, Sameer advised that filing for a change of status to H-4 or applying for a B-1/B-2 visa can help maintain legal status. Even if a job offer is pending, having an application on file can be sufficient to convince the courts to dismiss the case.

Sameer also addressed the challenges faced by non-working spouses and children of H-1B holders. The anxiety surrounding potential deportation can be overwhelming, especially for families who have built their lives in the U.S. Fortunately, many individuals have successfully navigated the legal system to maintain their status, but the process remains fraught with uncertainty.

As the situation continues to evolve, Sameer encouraged H-1B visa holders to remain vigilant and proactive. Monitoring the status of their visa and seeking legal counsel tailored to their individual circumstances is essential. Engaging a personal immigration attorney, rather than relying on company resources, can provide the necessary support in navigating these complex issues.

In conclusion, the current landscape for H-1B visa holders is marked by uncertainty and anxiety. As the government tightens regulations and issues NTAs more frequently, it is crucial for visa holders to understand their rights and options. By taking proactive steps and seeking legal guidance, individuals can better navigate this challenging environment.

Source: Original article

Moving Can Expose Personal Data to Scammers, Experts Warn

Staff ReporterHealth, Immigration, Society 0

Moving can expose seniors to identity theft and scams as data brokers collect personal information to sell to criminals, making it crucial to take steps to protect one’s data.

For many seniors, moving and downsizing can symbolize a fresh start. With a smaller home and less upkeep, it often opens the door to new friendships in retirement communities. However, this transition can also make them vulnerable to identity theft and scams.

Each year, over 3 million elderly Americans relocate, and unfortunately, this demographic is increasingly targeted by scammers. One individual shared her experience of moving her mother into an assisted living facility, only to have her fall victim to two scams before the packing was even completed. The scammers had quickly obtained her mother’s new address and exploited it.

This scenario is not uncommon. Research indicates that more than 70% of cybercrimes are linked to exposed personal data. The act of moving can significantly increase this exposure, as real estate listings, address changes, and moving company records are often collected by data brokers. These brokers then sell this information to criminals, creating a perfect storm for potential scams.

When individuals buy, sell, or change their address, their personal information can spread across numerous systems. Data brokers collect and bundle this information, making it readily available for purchase. This situation is particularly concerning for seniors, who may be preoccupied with the logistics of moving while their personal data is being targeted.

As seniors unpack boxes in their new homes, criminals are simultaneously unpacking their data. This duality highlights the importance of taking proactive measures to safeguard personal information during the moving process.

Data brokers automatically update their files when individuals move, meaning that new addresses, phone numbers, and property transaction details can appear on people-search websites almost instantaneously. Once this information is publicly accessible, scammers can easily acquire it.

The good news is that individuals do not have to tackle the challenge of removing their data from brokers alone. Personal data removal services can assist by contacting data brokers, requesting the removal of personal information, and ensuring that new details do not reappear online. This service functions similarly to hiring a moving company, but for personal data.

While no service can guarantee complete removal of personal data from the internet, utilizing a data removal service can be a wise investment. These services actively monitor and systematically erase personal information from numerous websites, providing peace of mind and reducing the risk of scammers cross-referencing data from breaches with information available on the dark web.

When changing addresses, it is essential to use the official USPS website or visit a local post office. Some third-party sites may appear to offer convenient services but often collect additional data that can be resold. By going directly to the source, individuals can minimize unnecessary exposure of sensitive information.

Additionally, selling a home involves more than just disclosing the price. Personal details such as names, previous addresses, and even photographs of the property can become part of the public record. It is advisable to consult with realtors about what information is automatically disclosed and whether any details can be limited or redacted. Being selective about what is shared can significantly reduce one’s personal footprint tied to a property.

Moving also presents an excellent opportunity to declutter. However, it is crucial not to simply discard old bills, medical statements, or financial records. Instead, these documents should be shredded to prevent identity theft. Despite the perception that dumpster diving is outdated, it remains a tactic used by scammers to obtain personal data. A reliable shredder can help ensure that sensitive information does not fall into the wrong hands.

While it may be tempting to share a “Goodbye, old house!” photo on social media, it is wise to resist this urge. Publicly announcing a move can inform scammers about when a home is empty and reveal a new address. Instead, sharing this news privately with family and close friends can enhance safety.

Another effective strategy for protecting personal information is to freeze credit. This action prevents new credit accounts from being opened in an individual’s name, even if scammers have access to personal details such as an address. Freezing credit is a straightforward process that can be done at no cost with all three major credit bureaus: Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion. This measure creates a robust barrier against identity theft, allowing individuals to lift the freeze when necessary.

Moving should be a time of excitement and new beginnings, not an invitation for scammers to exploit vulnerabilities. By taking proactive steps to protect personal data, individuals can significantly reduce their risk of falling victim to fraud. Simple actions, such as shredding documents and freezing credit, can provide essential layers of protection. Ultimately, safeguarding personal information allows seniors to embark on their next chapter with confidence and peace of mind.

Source: Original article

Communities Show Solidarity With Immigrants in the U.S.

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics, USA 0

Community groups across the U.S. are actively resisting deportation policies and advocating for immigrant rights, emphasizing the vital role immigrants play in the economy.

In response to the Trump administration’s stringent deportation policies, community groups throughout the United States are rallying to advocate for immigrant rights and protections. Their message is clear: “No human being is illegal.”

These powerful slogans resonate deeply within the immigrant rights movement, echoing the sentiments of community activists across the nation. The deportation of immigrants has surged since the Trump administration took office, with reports detailing the shocking deportation of 104 Indians on a military plane in February 2025. To date, nearly 400 Indians have faced deportation.

Over recent months, agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have detained several student activists involved in peaceful protests against the destruction of Gaza. The administration has invoked the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act to deport nearly 300 immigrants to the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT) in El Salvador, a facility notorious for its harsh conditions.

ICE raids have targeted immigrant communities in various towns and cities across America. In Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, local residents banded together to support their neighbors and friends, demanding due process in the face of these aggressive actions.

Organizations dedicated to immigrant rights, along with legal advocates and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), are working tirelessly to halt deportations, and some courts have issued favorable rulings. The current U.S. population of approximately 342 million includes 53.3 million immigrants, with around 15 million classified as undocumented, often referred to disparagingly as illegal immigrants, according to a January report from the Center for Immigration Studies.

Activists are raising critical questions about who truly contributes to the wealth of the U.S. economy and performs the most challenging jobs. Immigrant workers are recognized as the backbone of the economy, a sentiment echoed at a recent seminar titled “Union and Community Activists Unite for Immigrant Rights,” organized by the Boston South Asian Coalition at the Cambridge Community Center in Massachusetts. The discussions held at this event remain relevant as the issues surrounding immigrant rights continue to escalate.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the construction industry employs approximately eight million workers, with 1.6 million of them being immigrants, representing 20% of the workforce. A report from the University of Michigan highlights that in cities like New York, immigrant workers make up 63% of construction workers, with 40% being undocumented. Furthermore, undocumented immigrant workers face a significantly higher incidence of work-related injuries, with rates 30% higher than those of native-born workers.

The agricultural sector also relies heavily on immigrant labor, contributing 0.8% to the GDP, which amounts to $222 billion. The combined agriculture and food-related industries account for 5.5% of the GDP, totaling $1.53 trillion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis in 2023. Remarkably, 73% of farm workers are immigrants, with half of them being undocumented.

In the care economy, which includes roles such as nannies, cleaners, and personal care assistants, an estimated 300,000 workers are undocumented, as reported by the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. David Grabowski, a professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School, noted that foreign-born workers constitute over 30% of non-direct care staff in long-term care facilities, emphasizing their crucial role in maintaining quality care.

The meatpacking industry, known for its hazardous working conditions, employs over 500,000 workers across the country. This sector heavily relies on H-2A and H-2B visa programs to fill jobs, as reported by the American Immigration Council. A 2024 report by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) revealed that 5,486 workers died on the job in 2022, with 1,248 of those fatalities involving Latino workers, 60% of whom were immigrants.

Community leaders and union activists are calling for organized efforts to combat the attacks on immigrants and all workers. Amrita Dani from the Boston Teachers Union emphasized the importance of collective action, stating, “Teachers and other organized workers can and should organize without fear with members of the community.”

She highlighted the legacy of International Workers Day, honoring the millions of immigrants who participated in demonstrations in May 2006. Evan MacKay, a Boston-based labor leader, pointed out that while contracts can secure victories, active enforcement by the workers is essential to ensure that legal agreements translate into real protections.

Heloisa Galvao, Executive Director of the Brazilian Women’s Group in Boston, shared the growing fears within the Brazilian community, where individuals are hesitant to attend doctor’s appointments, go to work, or send their children to school. This panic has resulted in devastating income losses, leading to increased rates of homelessness and food insecurity.

Galvao advocates for collective action to protect immigrant workers and their families, striving to create a just world for all. The rallying cries of “Hum Ladenge aur Aum Jeetenge!” (We will fight and win!) and “Si Si Puede” (Yes, yes, we can!) reflect the determination of union activists and community organizers from diverse backgrounds to ensure the safety and rights of immigrants.

As the fight for immigrant rights continues, it is clear that solidarity among workers and families is essential, regardless of immigration status. The ongoing efforts of community groups and activists highlight the critical role immigrants play in the fabric of American society.

Source: Original article

Scammers Exploit DocuSign Emails to Facilitate Apple Pay Fraud

Staff ReporterImmigration, Technology 0

Scammers are increasingly using fake DocuSign emails to impersonate Apple Pay transactions, aiming to steal personal information through fraudulent phone numbers and deceptive receipts.

Phishing scams are becoming more sophisticated, with one of the latest tactics involving fake DocuSign emails that appear to show charges from reputable companies like Apple. At first glance, these fraudulent messages seem legitimate, often including a receipt, order ID, and even a support number. However, instead of connecting recipients to Apple or another legitimate service, that number leads directly to scammers.

These phishing emails typically masquerade as billing receipts for recent Apple Pay purchases. They often claim that a subscription has been charged to the recipient’s account and prompt them to call a phone number if they do not recognize the charge. To enhance their credibility, the emails frequently reference well-known brands such as Apple, Netflix, and Expedia, or even local service providers.

Some of these emails include a “DocuSign” link accompanied by a security code, creating the illusion that recipients must access a file to confirm the transaction. In reality, neither Apple nor any of these other companies sends billing receipts through DocuSign, which serves as a significant red flag.

Another telltale sign of these scams is the sender’s email address. Scammers often use addresses that contain odd characters, such as a Cyrillic “B” replacing the “B” in “Billing,” which helps them bypass spam filters.

The scam is designed to catch individuals off guard and pressure them into acting quickly. The email claims that the recipient’s Apple Pay account has been charged for a subscription or purchase, providing an order ID, a charge amount, and a DocuSign link that supposedly contains a receipt or confirmation file. To make the message even more convincing, some versions include a security code to “unlock” the document.

The email also lists a phone number and urges recipients to call if the charge was not authorized. Unfortunately, that number is central to the scam. Instead of reaching Apple, Netflix, or whichever company the email claims to represent, individuals end up speaking with a scammer posing as a support agent.

Once on the call, the scammer attempts to convince the victim that their account has been compromised or that the payment must be reversed immediately. From there, the tactics can vary. Scammers may ask for personal information, such as Apple ID, banking details, or credit card numbers. They might pressure victims to download remote access software under the guise of “fixing” the issue on their device. In some cases, they even demand payment for fictitious account protection or reversal fees.

The ultimate goal of these scams is consistent: to gain enough access to lock victims out of their accounts, steal sensitive data, or initiate fraudulent transactions. What makes these scams particularly dangerous is their combination of multiple red flags within a single message: a realistic-looking receipt, official logos, a DocuSign link, urgent language, and a phone number that appears to be the quickest way to resolve the issue.

Scammers rely on individuals reacting quickly without questioning the details. However, there are several practical steps that people can take to protect themselves from falling victim to these schemes.

First, be wary of email addresses that closely resemble official ones but contain subtle differences, such as extra letters or swapped characters. If the email does not originate from an official domain like @apple.com, it is likely illegitimate.

Second, remember that Apple, Netflix, and other major services do not send billing statements through DocuSign. If a receipt arrives in this format, it is safe to assume it is a scam. Legitimate receipts always come directly from the service provider.

Additionally, exercise caution with any links in suspicious emails. Scammers often disguise harmful links behind text that appears legitimate, such as “View Document” or “Review Payment.” Hovering over the link without clicking can reveal the true web address. If it does not match the official company domain, do not click on it.

Installing strong antivirus software on all devices is another effective way to safeguard against malicious links. This protection can alert users to phishing emails and ransomware scams, helping to keep personal information and digital assets secure.

Instead of relying solely on the email, confirm whether a charge actually exists. Apple users can review purchases directly from the Settings app under their Apple ID. If nothing appears, the receipt is likely fake. Other services offer similar methods for checking transaction history.

Finally, limiting the information available about oneself online can make it more challenging for scammers to craft convincing attacks. Consider removing old accounts that are no longer in use, restricting personal details shared on social media, and utilizing data removal services when possible. This approach reduces the risk of having your name, email, or phone number targeted in scams like this.

While no service can guarantee complete removal of personal data from the internet, data removal services can actively monitor and systematically erase personal information from numerous websites. This proactive approach can provide peace of mind and significantly reduce the risk of being targeted by scammers.

Phishing scams are constantly evolving, and the DocuSign Apple Pay ruse is just one of many. The best defense is to maintain a healthy dose of skepticism. If something feels off, take a moment to stop, double-check, and confirm details through official channels. Scammers thrive on panic and quick reactions. By slowing down and verifying information, individuals can better protect themselves from falling into these traps.

Source: Original article

Young Poet Receives 2025 Award for Creative Writing on Refugees

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

Eleven-year-old Luu Ly from New York City won the 2025 Celebrate America Creative Writing Contest for her poignant poem honoring her grandparents’ journey as refugees from Vietnam.

WASHINGTON, DC, June 24, 2025—The American Immigration Council has awarded Luu Ly, an 11-year-old student at the Chapin School in New York City, the prestigious 28th annual Celebrate America Creative Writing Contest award. This contest celebrates the immigrant experience through the lens of young writers.

Luu’s poem, titled “American Poem,” tells the compelling story of her grandparents’ escape from Vietnam during the war. It details their journey as refugees who eventually settled in a small town in Louisiana. Initially facing hostility and suspicion from their new community, Luu’s grandmother became one of the first Vietnamese American teachers in the area. Through her dedication and the sharing of her family’s spring roll recipe, she fostered a sense of belonging and connection among her neighbors. Luu continues to honor her grandmother’s legacy by making spring rolls and embracing her grandmother’s motto: “roll forward, always forward.”

In addition to her poetic talents, Luu describes herself as a “proud New Yorker with a foodie’s heart.” She enjoys exploring diverse cuisines and sharing culinary experiences with family and friends, reflecting the values of community and connection that her grandmother instilled in her.

The Celebrate America Creative Writing Contest invites fifth graders from across the nation to reflect on immigration and the importance of being a welcoming society. In a climate where many Americans are increasingly critical of policies that prioritize mass deportation and detention of immigrants, the American Immigration Council is committed to promoting educational initiatives that encourage a more inclusive vision for the United States.

Luu received her award during the 2025 Immigration Impact Reception, hosted by the American Immigration Council on June 20 in Aurora, Colorado. The contest is made possible through the generous support of the MurthyNAYAK Foundation.

Luu, along with her family and representatives from the American Immigration Council, are available to discuss the contest and her winning poem.

Source: Original article

Senate Approves Significant Funding for Immigration Enforcement and Deportation

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

The U.S. Senate has approved a budget reconciliation bill that allocates unprecedented funding for immigration enforcement, while simultaneously jeopardizing healthcare access for millions of Americans.

Washington, D.C., July 1, 2025 — On July 1, the U.S. Senate passed a budget reconciliation bill that includes an unprecedented allocation of funds for immigration detention and enforcement. This decision comes at a time when millions of Americans face the loss of their healthcare coverage.

The bill was passed with a tie-breaking vote from Vice President JD Vance, earmarking approximately $170 billion for immigration and border enforcement-related provisions. This funding represents a significant increase in the federal budget for immigration enforcement.

Among the key allocations in the bill are $45 billion designated for the construction of new immigration detention centers, including facilities for families. This funding marks a staggering 265 percent increase in the annual budget for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and is 62 percent larger than the entire federal prison system budget. The new funding could result in the daily detention of at least 116,000 non-citizens.

Additionally, the bill allocates $29.9 billion for ICE’s enforcement and deportation operations, effectively tripling the agency’s annual budget. This increase in funding for enforcement comes at a time when between 12 million and 17 million people are at risk of losing their healthcare coverage.

The legislation also caps the number of immigration judges at 800, despite the ongoing record backlogs in the immigration court system. Furthermore, it includes $46.6 billion for border wall construction, which is more than three times the amount spent by the Trump administration during its first term. Critics argue that the wall has failed to contribute meaningfully to border management strategies.

Another notable provision is a new $10 billion fund intended to reimburse the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for costs associated with “safeguarding” U.S. borders against illegal entry. This funding constitutes nearly 50 percent of the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) budget for fiscal year 2024. However, unlike standard budget allocations, this fund lacks strict guidelines, potentially allowing CBP to utilize the funds with minimal oversight.

Overall, this legislation marks the largest investment in detention and deportation in U.S. history. Critics contend that this policy choice does not address the systemic failures of the immigration system and instead exacerbates issues, causing harm and chaos while tearing families apart.

“This bill will deprive 12 to 17 million Americans of basic healthcare while investing unprecedented levels of funding in the president’s increasingly unpopular mass deportation agenda,” said Nayna Gupta, policy director at the American Immigration Council. “At a time when polls show more Americans rejecting mass detention and deportation, this bill ignores what Americans want and doubles down on punitive policies that do nothing to address the real problems in our immigration system, including court backlogs, a lack of legal pathways to citizenship, and a broken U.S. asylum system.”

The enforcement-heavy provisions of the bill come at the expense of necessary investments in asylum processing, legal representation, community-based alternatives to detention, and support for local governments and nonprofits that assist new arrivals.

“Throwing billions at detention centers and enforcement agents is short-sighted. Instead, we should be investing in a system aimed at welcoming immigrants who contribute billions to our economy,” stated Adriel Orozco, senior policy counsel at the American Immigration Council. “We don’t need more jail beds and indiscriminate raids. We need balanced solutions that strengthen due process and keep families together.”

The bill will now return to the House of Representatives, where members are expected to vote on final passage later this week. Experts from the American Immigration Council are available to provide further insights into the specifics of the bill, including its implications for immigration courts, border funding, unaccompanied children, and the increase in ICE agents.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Proposes Four-Year Limit for Foreign Students in the U.S.

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics, USA 0

The Trump administration has proposed a rule to limit the duration of stay for international students in the U.S. to four years, aiming to address visa misuse and enhance oversight.

The Trump administration has announced a proposed rule that would impose a four-year limit on the length of time international students can remain in the United States for their studies. This rule, set to be published on Thursday, is part of an effort to curb what the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) describes as “visa abuse” and to improve the agency’s ability to vet and oversee foreign students.

According to the DHS, foreign students have taken advantage of U.S. policies, remaining enrolled in educational programs indefinitely, which the agency refers to as becoming “forever students.” A spokesperson for the DHS stated, “For too long, past Administrations have allowed foreign students and other visa holders to remain in the U.S. virtually indefinitely, posing safety risks, costing untold amounts of taxpayer dollars, and disadvantaging U.S. citizens.”

The proposed rule aims to end this practice by limiting the duration of stay for certain visa holders, thereby easing the federal government’s burden in overseeing foreign students and their immigration history. Since 1978, holders of F visas, which are designated for foreign students, have been allowed to remain in the U.S. for the “duration of status,” meaning as long as they are enrolled as full-time students.

Under the new proposal, foreign students and exchange visitors would be allowed to stay in the U.S. only for the duration of their academic program, capped at four years. This duration is typically shorter than the time required to pursue advanced degrees beyond a bachelor’s degree.

In addition to the changes for students, the proposed rule would also affect foreign journalists, who would initially be admitted for up to 240 days. They could apply for an extension of up to another 240 days, but their stay would not exceed the length of their assignment.

The DHS believes that requiring regular assessments for foreigners wishing to remain in the U.S. for extended periods will facilitate better oversight and reduce the number of individuals in the country on visas. However, the proposed rule has raised concerns among educational institutions and advocates for international students.

International students often pay higher tuition rates and have limited access to scholarships, which means that this new rule could have significant financial implications for U.S. colleges and universities. Fanta Aw, executive director and CEO of NAFSA: Association of International Educators, expressed concern about the potential impact, stating, “It will certainly act as an additional deterrent to international students choosing to study in the United States, to the detriment of American economies, innovation, and global competitiveness.”

As the proposed rule moves forward, it is expected to spark debate over the balance between national security and the benefits of international education in the U.S.

Source: Original article

Ilia: Young Russian Dissident Endures Prolonged Detention

Staff ReporterConflict, Immigration 0

Ilia, a 24-year-old Russian dissident, faces prolonged detention in the U.S. after fleeing persecution in his homeland, despite winning his asylum case.

Ilia, a 24-year-old pro-democracy activist, recently escaped a perilous situation in Russia, only to find himself in a detention facility in the United States. He believed that the U.S. would offer him refuge from the oppressive regime he fled, but instead, he was taken into custody upon arrival.

“I fled Russia because of increasingly harsh laws, because of a government that started persecuting me for my political views and my sexual orientation,” Ilia explains. “I believed the United States would help me.”

Ilia’s activism intensified following the arrest of prominent opposition leader Alexei Navalny in January 2021. Outraged by the government’s actions, he participated in nationwide protests and distributed “Free Navalny” flyers in Krasnodar, the southern Russian city where he was studying at university. The government’s response to these protests was severe, with thousands detained and many subjected to violence by law enforcement. Tragically, Navalny died under suspicious circumstances in a Russian prison camp in February 2024.

By that time, Ilia had already fled Russia, having received threats from Russian intelligence officials. As a nonbinary individual, he faced heightened risks under Putin’s increasingly repressive laws, where simply existing as he does could lead to persecution or imprisonment.

Ilia made his way to Mexico, meticulously following the asylum process. He spent eight months near the border, waiting for a CBP One appointment. In May 2024, when he finally arrived for his scheduled appointment, he was unexpectedly taken into custody and placed in detention at a facility in Louisiana notorious for its abusive conditions.

“I applied for asylum because I believed the U.S. would help me,” Ilia recounts. “But once I was sent to Winn Correctional Center in Louisiana, I faced horrible treatment. The way officers treat detainees is awful. They yell at them, sometimes go as far as to discriminate, make racist remarks, and even subject detainees to sexual abuse.” Despite filing multiple complaints during his year-long detention, Ilia reports that they have gone unanswered.

Although Ilia was detained before the Trump administration took office, he has experienced the effects of its hardline immigration policies firsthand. In March 2025, he won his asylum case after an immigration judge reviewed 900 pages of evidence, including threats from Russian intelligence and letters of support from witnesses to his activism. At this juncture, Ilia should have been released from detention and allowed to start rebuilding his life in the U.S. However, the Trump administration has continued to deny his release.

Ilia has no criminal history and poses no threat to his community. His asylum case was granted based on the fact that he was targeted for advocating the very democratic ideals of free speech that the United States was founded upon. Yet, he continues to endure unnecessary suffering, even after being deemed worthy of protection.

“The situation [in the detention centers] has gotten worse,” Ilia states, noting that the facility where he is held has been operating at maximum capacity since the Trump administration took office. “People have started to realize there’s no way out, that they’re just waiting here to be deported, and they’re losing their minds.”

Source: Original article

Scammers Target Individuals Without Social Media Presence, Experts Warn

Staff ReporterImmigration, Society 0

Scammers are increasingly targeting seniors who avoid social media, using public records to steal personal information and money.

Many seniors often believe that by avoiding social media and the internet, they are safe from scammers. However, this assumption is misleading. Even those who have never posted online can become victims of fraud.

Scammers can gather a wealth of information about individuals, including their age, home address, names of relatives, property values, and even details about personal losses. This information is often obtained through public records that are digitized and sold, allowing fraudsters to exploit it for their gain.

The reality is that personal information can become public record without any action from the individual. This is largely due to the operations of legal and governmental systems that automatically make certain details accessible. Common sources of this information include obituaries, real estate filings, and probate records.

While these records may seem innocuous on their own, when combined, they create a comprehensive profile of an individual’s life. One particularly cruel scam that has emerged is known as the bereavement scam. In this scheme, scammers monitor local obituaries to identify individuals who have recently lost a loved one. They then reach out to these individuals, posing as funeral homes, grief counselors, or charities, using real names and dates to lend authenticity to their claims.

During times of mourning, individuals are often more vulnerable and less guarded, making them prime targets for these types of scams. Scammers are aware of this emotional vulnerability and exploit it to steal money and personal information.

Even more troubling is the fact that scammers can continue to target the loved ones of deceased individuals long after their passing. They may contact relatives, offering free memorial services or financial products, preying on their grief and vulnerability. This exploitation is made possible by the personal data that has been exposed.

Many people do not realize that scammers typically do not sift through courthouse files themselves. Instead, they rely on data brokers—companies that specialize in collecting and selling personal information. These brokers gather data from various sources, including public records, online purchases, and even leaked information from data breaches.

The result is a detailed, searchable profile that can be sold to anyone willing to pay for it. Even if an individual has never engaged with social media, they may still have a ‘shadow profile’ created from information shared by others or from data breaches. This makes it easier for scammers to target them.

Fortunately, individuals are not entirely powerless against these threats. While it is impossible to eliminate public records, there are steps that can be taken to make it more difficult for scammers to access and misuse personal information. One effective strategy is to utilize data removal services, which actively monitor and remove personal information from various websites. While these services may come at a cost, they can provide peace of mind and significantly reduce the risk of identity theft.

By limiting the availability of personal information, individuals can decrease the likelihood of scammers cross-referencing data from breaches with publicly available information. This makes it harder for fraudsters to target them effectively.

It is essential to recognize that simply avoiding social media does not guarantee invisibility. Scammers do not need individuals to share their lives online; their offline activities can also be tracked and exploited. Public records, such as obituaries and property deeds, are transformed into data points that are sold to brokers and resold to scammers.

Protecting personal data is not solely about avoiding the internet; it is about actively managing and reducing the information that is already available. The less data that scammers can find, the more challenging it becomes for them to execute realistic and emotionally charged attacks. This is a crucial step in safeguarding one’s identity, finances, and retirement.

As concerns about data privacy continue to grow, many individuals believe it is time for government and companies to take stronger action to protect personal information. Engaging in discussions about data privacy can help raise awareness and promote change.

Source: Original article

Reform UK Plans To Deport 600,000 Asylum Seekers In New Crackdown

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has proposed a controversial plan to deport 600,000 asylum seekers, sparking criticism from various political and charitable organizations.

Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, has unveiled a sweeping proposal aimed at addressing immigration in Britain. The plan includes the deportation of up to 600,000 asylum seekers and the withdrawal from key international treaties, including the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Farage’s announcement comes amid rising concerns over immigration, with the party asserting that such measures are necessary to prevent “civil disorder.” He characterized the current situation as an “invasion,” claiming that young men are illegally entering the country.

Dubbed Operation Restoring Justice, the initiative is presented as a solution to the ongoing issue of small boats crossing the English Channel. Farage stated that migrants intercepted at sea should be detained and subsequently deported. “If we do that, the boats will stop coming in days because there will be no incentive,” he asserted during a press conference.

The ECHR has been a critical component of U.K. human rights law, often utilized to halt the deportation of migrants deemed to be in the country illegally. Farage’s proposal to repeal the Human Rights Act and scrap international treaties that impede forced deportations has drawn significant criticism.

Labour Party Chairwoman Ellie Reeves responded to the announcement by emphasizing the lack of detail in the plan. “Today, we got none of those things, nor a single answer to the practical, financial, or ethical questions about how their plan would work,” she remarked.

This proposal follows weeks of small protests addressing mass migration and crimes associated with some asylum seekers. In 2024, Britain received a record 108,100 asylum applications, with many coming from countries such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, and Bangladesh.

Polling data indicates that immigration has surpassed economic concerns as the top issue for voters. Despite holding only four seats in Parliament, Reform UK is currently leading in surveys regarding voting intentions.

Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook dismissed the proposals as “a series of gimmicks” that would ultimately prove ineffective. Critics, including various charities, argue that the plan represents a significant departure from Britain’s human rights commitments.

As the debate continues, the implications of such a drastic immigration policy remain a contentious topic within British politics.

Source: Original article

Axel, DACA Recipient, Works to Protect His Community

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics, USA 0

Axel Herrera, a DACA recipient in North Carolina, faces increasing challenges as local police checkpoints instill fear in his community, prompting him to take action for those affected by immigration policies.

Since the election of President Trump, Axel Herrera has witnessed a troubling rise in local police traffic checkpoints throughout his North Carolina community. Although Axel, a recipient of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), has legal protection from deportation, many of his friends and family members have been detained or deported following random traffic stops. This reality has left numerous undocumented individuals in his community living in constant fear. “It’s creating a hostile environment,” Axel states. “It’s pretty clear what the government is trying to do.”

At 27 years old, Axel has called North Carolina home since he was seven, when his family fled Honduras in search of a better life. Receiving DACA status felt like a significant achievement for Axel and his family, allowing him to pursue opportunities that once seemed out of reach. He earned a scholarship to Duke University, becoming the first in his family to attend college, and graduated with multiple accolades, including a prestigious Congressional internship.

Following his graduation, Axel took on the role of civic engagement director for Mi Familia en Acción, a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting Hispanic communities. Over the years, he has focused on registering citizens to vote, developing youth programs, and mentoring immigrants as they navigate educational and professional pathways. “All I ever wanted was to belong, and to give something back,” he reflects.

However, the current political climate has posed significant challenges for Axel and others like him. Ongoing legal battles surrounding DACA threaten to undermine his protection from deportation. Axel must renew his DACA status and employment authorization every two years. Although he managed to process his paperwork just before Trump took office, he remains uncertain about the future of his status when it expires in 2026. He is aware that some Dreamers are struggling to have their applications processed, and the Trump administration has already deported at least one DACA recipient under the pretense of an outstanding deportation order. “Right now, everything is up in the air,” Axel admits. “I’m very concerned about the future.”

One potential outcome is that courts may uphold DACA but revoke the work authorization for its recipients. Given this uncertainty, Axel has decided to step away from his hard-earned job and return to school. This fall, he will leave North Carolina for Yale University, where he has received a scholarship to study business and public policy. “It’s a great opportunity, but also a hedge against losing my status,” he explains. “If I lose my work authorization, then being a student might buy me some time and let me find a different path forward.”

Despite his current protections, Axel feels conflicted about leaving his community behind. Many of his friends and family are constantly communicating via WhatsApp, assessing police conditions whenever they step outside. He knows several young Venezuelans whose humanitarian parole was recently revoked, rendering them unable to work or study. Over the past six months, he has witnessed families torn apart by raids and deportations, or who are simply too afraid of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to pursue education. “I speak all the time with young people whose whole future is on the chopping block,” Axel shares.

Yet, even with his protections, Axel acknowledges a pervasive anxiety. “There’s this looming sense that things could get worse fast,” he says. Under the Trump administration, anti-immigrant sentiment and policies have become more entrenched. He is particularly concerned about the long-term implications of a new state law that mandates sheriffs to cooperate with ICE. Axel fears for his family’s future, stating, “After 20 years, we’re barely scratching the surface of dealing with our status issues. It never ends—and the Trump administration is rolling back so much of the progress we’ve made.”

Source: Original article

Flesh-Eating Parasite Case Reported in U.S. Traveler from Central America

Staff ReporterHealth, Immigration, USA 0

The CDC has confirmed a case of human screwworm infection in Maryland linked to a Central American outbreak, but officials say the risk to public health is very low.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has confirmed the first case of a travel-associated human screwworm infection in Maryland. This case is linked to an outbreak in Central America, specifically in El Salvador.

Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for the Maryland Department of Health and Human Services, informed Fox News Digital that the patient had recently returned from El Salvador, a country currently experiencing a screwworm outbreak. The CDC collaborated with state health officials to investigate the case.

On August 4, the CDC confirmed the diagnosis after experts analyzed images of the larvae. Nixon emphasized that “the risk to public health in the United States from this introduction is very low.”

The New World screwworm, also known as myiasis, is a parasitic infestation caused by fly larvae that feed on living flesh. According to the CDC, individuals can contract myiasis when female flies deposit their eggs on or near a person’s wounds, nose, or ears. The condition can also be transmitted through ticks and mosquitoes that carry the fly’s eggs.

As the larvae grow and consume flesh, a lump develops in the infected person’s tissues. Health experts warn that if left untreated, myiasis can be fatal.

The CDC notes that myiasis is not common in the United States. Most cases diagnosed in the U.S. involve individuals who have traveled to tropical regions where the condition is more prevalent. Livestock, including cattle, sheep, and goats, are particularly susceptible to this parasite, making it a significant economic concern.

In recent reports, Reuters highlighted that the CDC had confirmed a case of New World screwworm in Maryland from a traveler returning from Guatemala. However, the discrepancy regarding the origin of the case remains unverified.

This summer, USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins announced plans to establish a sterile fly facility in Texas aimed at combating the screwworm pest. A potential outbreak in Texas could lead to an estimated economic loss of $1.8 billion due to livestock deaths, labor costs, and medication expenses.

As of now, there have been no confirmed animal cases of screwworm infection in the U.S. this year. Fox News Digital has reached out to the USDA for further comments on the situation.

Source: Original article

Kaelyn Faces Debt to Prevent Partner’s Deportation to El Salvador

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics, Travel/Immigration 0

Kaelyn’s relationship with Yapa, an asylum seeker from Venezuela, has turned into a desperate struggle against deportation, leading her to incur significant debt for legal assistance.

Last summer, Kaelyn found herself at a Latin club in Wilmington, North Carolina, when a charming stranger asked her to dance. Initially reluctant, she was drawn in by his genuine nature. “If anyone else had asked, I would’ve said no, but Yapa is so genuine,” she recalls, using a pseudonym to protect his identity. What began with a dance blossomed into a deep friendship, one that would soon lead to a fight for Yapa’s freedom.

Yapa, who fled violence in Venezuela in 2022, had been navigating the complexities of the U.S. immigration system. He attended regular court hearings and held a legal work permit, working as a delivery driver while aspiring to obtain his commercial trucking license. As their relationship deepened, Kaelyn became an integral part of his life.

The couple spent Thanksgiving together, with Yapa bonding with Kaelyn’s family. He played pool with her father, and her sisters affectionately began calling Kaelyn “reina”—a term of endearment Yapa had used when they first met. They enjoyed movie nights, often watching the Fast and Furious series, and supported each other through language barriers with translation apps and Kaelyn’s college Spanish. Each morning, Yapa would text her to inquire about her day, solidifying their connection.

Before meeting Yapa, Kaelyn, originally from Connecticut, had rarely considered immigration policy. However, the political climate shifted dramatically after President Trump took office, leading her to worry about the fate of asylum seekers. “People would tell me, Oh, you’re overreacting,” she says. “This isn’t 1930s Germany. And I’d say, Yeah, but it’s starting to feel that way. Looking back now, while people were telling me I was being dramatic, I was actually underreacting.”

On February 22, 2025, everything changed when ICE agents unexpectedly arrived in the early morning hours as Yapa was heading to work. Without explanation, they handcuffed him, confiscating his ID and work permit—documents that have not been returned. They provided no details about his destination, only that he was being deported soon.

Kaelyn was devastated when she received a call from Yapa’s sister, informing her that ICE had “abducted” him. Yapa had stayed with Kaelyn until the night before, and she had hoped he would remain with her, feeling that as a U.S. citizen, she could better advocate for his rights. “I couldn’t explain it, but I was so emotional,” she reflects on their last night together. “And he told me, ‘There’s no reason for them to take me.’” Now, her worst fears had materialized, and they were uncertain of his whereabouts, but they knew they had to act quickly to save him.

By the time Kaelyn took action, Yapa had already been transported to Georgia’s Stewart Detention Center. It wasn’t until two months later, during his hearing, that ICE accused him of being affiliated with the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua (TdA). “Shocking is not even the word,” Kaelyn recalls. “I was shaking.”

In a recent court filing, ICE admitted it has no evidence linking Yapa to any gang. However, a ruling from the Trump administration complicates matters for immigrants like Yapa, who have recently entered the country and are seeking release from detention. As a result, Yapa faces the prospect of spending up to a year in detention while his asylum case is processed, with little control over where he might be deported if he loses.

Kaelyn’s reaction to the gang allegations was visceral; she understood the gravity of the situation. The possibility of Yapa being sent to CECOT, a notorious prison in El Salvador known for its brutality, weighed heavily on her. “I thought, I’m going to have to live the rest of my life knowing he’s in there, and there’s nothing that we can do to get him out of there,” she says. The notion that he—and many other innocent individuals—could be imprisoned in what some describe as a modern-day concentration camp is an “atrocity,” she asserts.

The emotional and financial toll on Kaelyn has been immense. She has hired multiple attorneys for Yapa, accumulating significant debt due to legal fees. Meanwhile, Yapa remains nine hours away from Wilmington, with limited access to phone calls. In April, attorneys from the American Immigration Council and the ACLU took on part of Yapa’s case pro bono. By May, they secured a ruling that prevents the Trump administration from deporting Yapa to CECOT or anywhere else based on the unsubstantiated gang allegations without allowing him a fair chance to contest them. While this decision brought some relief, Kaelyn feels as though her life has been turned upside down.

Conversations with her sister now primarily revolve around updates on Yapa’s case and the latest developments in immigration policy. “We can’t be happy when there’s literally a member of our family who’s been taken from us,” she states. “I’ll never let this go. The administration thinks they’re sowing fear—but they’re creating activists. You can’t destroy someone’s life and expect us to stay quiet.”

Source: Original article

Beatriz: Immigrant Lawyer Advocating for Noncitizen Children’s Rights

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

Beatriz, a Venezuelan-American lawyer, advocates for unaccompanied minors facing immigration proceedings, navigating challenges posed by recent federal policies that threaten their legal representation.

In February 2025, Beatriz, a Venezuelan-American lawyer, received an unexpected order from the Interior Department directing her nonprofit organization to cease all operations. This directive significantly impacted her work representing unaccompanied minors—children navigating immigration proceedings without their parents.

These vulnerable youngsters often find themselves in precarious situations, living with relatives, placed in foster care, or held in detention centers. Many are as young as Beatriz was when she immigrated to the United States at the age of eight, fleeing violence and political persecution in Venezuela with her family.

Having witnessed her parents struggle through numerous meetings with immigration lawyers, Beatriz pursued a legal career to leverage her experiences in helping others. “I know how terrifying it is to be a child, alone and unable to speak English, trying to deal with authority figures,” she reflects. “That’s why I became a lawyer, to bring some empathy to that process.” Today, Beatriz is a proud U.S. citizen.

The sudden stop-work order disrupted her mission. “It came completely out of the blue—suddenly, everything changed,” Beatriz recalls. The cancellation of federal contracts forced organizations like hers to downsize, leaving those who remained to manage an overwhelming workload. “For those of us left, it was all hands on deck,” she adds.

Although the stop-work order was later lifted, legal disputes over the canceled contracts continue. The immediate fallout, however, has been severe. “In practical terms, it left children without anybody to advocate for them,” Beatriz explains. While barred from providing direct assistance, she and her colleagues attended immigration hearings to observe and take notes. In one particularly heart-wrenching case, Beatriz witnessed a confused six-year-old appear in court without any legal representation. “These young children are being brought to immigration hearings—speaking no English, and without a lawyer—to try to explain why they shouldn’t be deported,” she laments.

Compounding the challenges, immigration courts have increasingly adopted “rocket dockets,” scheduling multiple hearings in a single day. “They started fast-tracking kids through the system at a time when we weren’t able to accompany them,” Beatriz notes. “It’s just been an onslaught of attacks, specifically targeting unaccompanied children.”

Beatriz has also observed the chaos in children’s lives caused by the detention of their caregivers by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Some of her young clients have been placed in detention or the foster care system, while in other instances, the government has withheld information about the whereabouts of caregivers. “It’s something none of my superiors—including people who worked during Trump’s first term—have ever experienced before,” she states.

The impact of these policies is evident in the anxiety experienced by the children Beatriz serves. Many are now afraid to attend school or even leave their homes. “So much of my job is now simply dealing with anxious kids,” she explains. “Pretty much every one of these children has a deep sense that the U.S. is no longer a safe place for them.”

This pervasive fear extends beyond the children to Beatriz’s entire community. Even before the Trump administration canceled Temporary Protected Status for approximately 350,000 Venezuelans, her WhatsApp groups were filled with messages from individuals whose loved ones had vanished from their neighborhoods. “I have friends who are scared to step onto the street,” she shares. “The demonization of my culture and my community is really hurtful, and really harmful.”

As discussions about denaturalizing or deporting U.S. citizens to foreign prisons and eliminating due process for migrants circulate, Beatriz worries for the safety of her own family, all of whom are now American citizens. “We worked hard to get citizenship, but there’s a real fear that even that won’t protect us,” she says. “For Venezuelans, the feelings of insecurity are always present. It really weighs heavily on us.”

Source: Original article

State Department Revokes Over 6,000 Student Visas Amid Policy Changes

Staff ReporterImmigration, Visa 0

The U.S. State Department has revoked over 6,000 student visas, primarily due to visa holders overstaying their visas or engaging in criminal activities.

The U.S. government has taken significant action by revoking more than 6,000 student visas, as confirmed by a State Department official on Monday. The majority of these revocations stem from visa holders overstaying their visas or violating laws.

According to reports, a substantial number of the visa cancellations—approximately 4,000—were linked to criminal records, which included offenses such as assault, driving under the influence (DUI), and burglary. Additionally, between 200 and 300 visas were revoked due to involvement in activities classified as terrorism-related by the State Department. One specific example cited was the fundraising for the Palestinian group Hamas.

This announcement from the State Department occurs in the context of the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to tighten regulations surrounding student visas. Earlier this year, the government temporarily paused student visa interviews for about three weeks. When these interviews resumed, consular officials were instructed to conduct more rigorous social media vetting to identify applicants with a history of political activism, particularly when such activism is associated with violence.

The revocation of these visas highlights the administration’s focus on national security and the scrutiny applied to foreign students entering the United States. The implications of these actions may resonate throughout the international student community, raising concerns about the potential impact on educational opportunities in the U.S.

As the situation develops, it remains to be seen how these changes will affect future visa applications and the overall landscape of international education in the United States.

Source: Original article

AI and Meditation Help Indian-American Overcome Layoff Challenges

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

Abhishek’s journey through job loss, resilience, and self-discovery highlights the transformative power of AI and meditation in overcoming adversity.

After dedicating 11 years to building a career in technology, Abhishek found himself at the pinnacle of his dreams—a role in AI Product Marketing at Google. However, in an instant, everything changed. On a cold January morning, he received an unexpected layoff email, leaving him to grapple with the loss of not just a job, but a significant part of his identity.

For many, losing a job can feel like losing a piece of oneself, and for those on work visas, the stakes are even higher. Abhishek had just 60 days to secure a new position or face the prospect of leaving the country he had called home for over a decade. With grief not an option, he was thrust into survival mode.

In the following months, Abhishek launched into a frantic job search, interviewing at 25 companies in less than two months. By the end of this period, he had endured 65 interviews, each one a grueling test of his resilience. The pressure was immense; he had no choice but to keep his visa status intact.

Securing a position at a smaller AI company provided some relief, but it was not the fresh start he had hoped for. Instead, it felt more like a temporary solution. His confidence took a hit as he navigated through a series of toxic work environments. One particularly harrowing experience involved being fired by a CEO on Christmas Day, a moment that left him questioning his self-worth.

As he continued to apply for jobs, Abhishek faced a barrage of rejections. Feedback ranged from “you’re knowledgeable but not the right fit” to “we found another candidate.” Each rejection chipped away at his self-esteem, making the journey feel increasingly daunting.

Amidst the chaos, Abhishek set his sights on a crucial goal: obtaining his green card. Encouraged by a friend from Google, he pursued the EB-1A route, designed for individuals with exceptional abilities. Despite his self-doubt, he worked diligently with an attorney to compile his achievements, ultimately leading to the approval of his green card petition. This newfound legal stability provided a much-needed safety net during a tumultuous time.

Even with this progress, the job search continued, and Abhishek found himself unemployed for over four months. Rather than succumbing to despair, he made a pivotal decision: he would focus on personal growth and learning. He immersed himself in the world of AI, not just as a passive observer but as an active participant.

Abhishek took the initiative to lead hands-on workshops in prompt engineering and revisited coding through free online tutorials. He experimented with various AI tools, including Claude, Perplexity, and Cursor, and volunteered on projects that allowed him to apply his skills in real-world scenarios. This proactive approach not only expanded his knowledge but also rekindled his belief in his capabilities.

After two and a half years of relentless effort, the tide began to turn. Abhishek received four job offers, a testament to his hard work and resilience. With his green card finally in hand, he secured a position that aligned with his aspirations, emerging from the experience more confident and skilled than ever before.

Reflecting on his journey, Abhishek shares valuable insights that he wishes he had known during his darkest days. First and foremost, he emphasizes the importance of building an inner reservoir of happiness and resilience. For him, meditation has been a cornerstone of this practice. With 25 years of experience, he credits his meditation guide, Gurudev Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, for instilling in him the optimism needed to persevere through challenging times.

Abhishek also advocates for hands-on learning, particularly in the rapidly evolving field of AI. He encourages others to actively engage with the technology, pursue free online courses, and take on projects that push their boundaries. The skills and confidence gained through practical experience are invaluable in today’s job market.

Finally, he reassures those who may be struggling that they are not alone. The challenges of rejection, visa anxiety, and toxic work environments do not define one’s worth. With perseverance and a commitment to personal growth, the tide can indeed turn, and brighter days lie ahead.

As Abhishek’s story illustrates, resilience, continuous learning, and a supportive community can help individuals navigate the tumultuous landscape of career challenges and emerge stronger on the other side.

Source: Original article

U.S. Government Faces Accountability Over Migrant Detentions in El Salvador

Staff ReporterConflict, Immigration 0

After 125 days of detention in El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, two Venezuelan nationals were released, prompting calls for accountability from the U.S. government regarding their treatment and forced return.

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 19, 2025 — Venezuelan nationals Edicson Quintero Chacón and Jose Manuel Ramos Bastidas were released yesterday after spending 125 days in El Salvador’s notorious Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT). Their release came as part of a U.S.-brokered flight back to Venezuela, which included approximately 250 other Venezuelans detained at CECOT.

Counsel for both men expressed profound relief at their release, emphasizing the urgent need for accountability from the U.S. government for their initial detention. The U.S. government had sent Quintero and Ramos to CECOT on March 15, 2025, where they were held without charges and incommunicado in a facility widely condemned for mass arbitrary detention and inhumane treatment.

Both men had previously been ordered removed from the United States but had communicated to a federal court their desire to return home to Venezuela. Instead, they were sent to CECOT, despite the terms of the agreement with El Salvador specifying that only “members” of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA) would be sent. There is no evidence linking either man to TdA.

Their return to Venezuela was part of a prisoner swap deal that also involved the release of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents from Venezuela.

“This news of flights to Venezuela was like being hit with a bucket of cold water because my family had absolutely no idea this was happening,” said a family member of Mr. Quintero Chacón, who requested anonymity. “Edicson should never have been sent to CECOT in the first place. No one should. He was treated cruelly and inhumanely when all he wanted was safety. This so-called prisoner swap doesn’t undo the injustice he suffered, nor the pain and terror that my family has had to endure in the past several months with no idea of whether we’d ever see him again.”

Roynerliz Rodriguez, partner of Jose Manuel Ramos Bastidas, shared her relief, stating, “We have been waiting for this moment for months, and I feel like I can finally breathe, knowing that Jose Manuel is now free from CECOT and on his way home. His son, whom he hasn’t seen since he was four months old, is eagerly waiting for him. These last months have been a living nightmare, not knowing anything about Jose Manuel and only imagining what he must be suffering.”

Concerns remain regarding the legality and transparency of the U.S. government’s actions. Many individuals sent to CECOT had pending asylum claims and expressed credible fears of returning to Venezuela. Their forced return, without due process to address their asylum requests, raises significant questions about the United States’ compliance with both domestic and international legal obligations.

To date, the U.S. government has not publicly accounted for how individuals were selected for transfer to CECOT or the full scope of conditions they endured. There has been no complete list of names released of those detained, leaving uncertainty about whether each victim is accounted for.

The use of foreign detention facilities, particularly those with documented records of systemic abuse, raises serious human rights and due process concerns. Critics argue that the U.S. government should not engage in detention outsourcing arrangements or collaborate with regimes that violate human rights. A full investigation into these disappearances is necessary, along with safeguards to prevent similar actions by future administrations.

“We are deeply relieved that Mr. Quintero Chacón and Mr. Ramos Bastidas are finally released from CECOT, but this should never have happened in the first place,” said Rebecca Cassler, senior litigation attorney at the American Immigration Council. “The U.S. government paid to detain these men in one of the world’s most notorious prisons, then denied responsibility while they suffered. For months, the Trump administration misled the courts and the public, pretending it had no control over their fate. This deal proves otherwise.”

CJ Sandley, senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights, added, “We celebrate this news, along with the loved ones of Mr. Quintero Chacón and Mr. Ramos Bastidas and over 250 Venezuelans who returned to Venezuela yesterday after being disappeared and tortured for months at the direction and expense of the United States government. The ‘deals’ made for these Venezuelans’ confinement and transfers treat human beings as bargaining chips and underscore the cruel consequences of criminalizing migration and monetizing torture.”

Stephanie M. Alvarez-Jones, Southeast Regional Attorney at the National Immigration Project, expressed her joy over the release but emphasized the need for accountability. “While we celebrate their long overdue release, the government must be held accountable for its outrageous actions,” she said.

The American Immigration Council, Center for Constitutional Rights, and the National Immigration Project represent Mr. Quintero Chacón and Mr. Ramos Bastidas in their habeas corpus proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, where they have been fighting for their freedom from CECOT.

Source: Original article

Trump’s Second Term Could Lead to Extreme Immigration Overhaul

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Politics 0

New report reveals that the Trump administration’s recent immigration policies threaten the foundations of American democracy, marking a significant overhaul of the U.S. immigration system.

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 23, 2025 — A special report released today provides a comprehensive analysis of the Trump administration’s first six months back in office, highlighting a dramatic transformation of the U.S. immigration system that poses a serious threat to the foundations of American democracy. While some voters may have favored a tougher stance on immigration when supporting Trump, the report illustrates how the administration’s extreme measures extend far beyond mere policy changes, undermining the rule of law itself.

Titled *Mass Deportation: Analyzing the Trump Administration’s Attacks on Immigrants, Democracy, and America*, the report was published by the American Immigration Council on July 23. It details how the administration has launched a radical, multi-faceted assault on immigrants and the immigration system.

The report outlines a series of aggressive actions that include restricting entry into the United States, removing legal protections for individuals already residing in the country, and escalating enforcement efforts to unprecedented levels. In doing so, the Trump administration has dismantled long-standing legal safeguards, disregarded the authority of Congress and the judiciary, and weaponized government resources against immigrants and dissenters alike.

“This isn’t just a hardline immigration agenda,” said Nayna Gupta, policy director at the American Immigration Council and co-author of the report. “It’s a wholesale effort to use immigrants and the U.S. immigration system to attack core tenets of our democracy and exercise unchecked executive power to realign the American government around exclusion and fear.”

Among the key findings highlighted in the report are several alarming developments:

The end of asylum has effectively occurred, with the administration shutting down the CBP One application without offering any alternative. Asylum-seekers arriving at ports of entry are routinely turned away, and many face indefinite detention even after winning their cases.

The refugee program has been decimated, with the administration indefinitely suspending the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, except for a select group of white South Africans who have been fast-tracked under questionable claims of persecution. This has left tens of thousands of approved refugees stranded abroad.

A mass revocation of legal status has taken place, with the administration aggressively rescinding humanitarian parole and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) from over a million individuals in just six months. This has stripped many of their work permits and pushed them into undocumented status.

The administration has also weaponized bureaucracy, creating significant obstacles for legal immigration pathways through massive fee increases, processing freezes, and opaque barriers that make it nearly impossible for lawful applicants to obtain or maintain their status.

The aggressive enforcement tactics employed by the Trump administration have instilled a pervasive atmosphere of fear and chaos among immigrants of all legal statuses. Individuals now live in constant anxiety over their safety in the United States, as anyone can be targeted for arrest, detention, and deportation, even in sensitive locations such as churches, schools, and courthouses.

Furthermore, the administration is orchestrating a radical reorganization of law enforcement resources, establishing an unprecedented cross-agency immigration operation that draws on manpower from various federal and state law enforcement agencies and the U.S. military. This effort prioritizes immigration enforcement above all other public safety and law enforcement objectives.

Additionally, the Trump administration’s “Big Beautiful Bill Act,” enacted in July, has turbocharged an already inhumane detention system by increasing ICE’s detention budget by 308 percent annually. This sets the stage for a drastic expansion of a detention system that has already subjected tens of thousands of immigrants to life-threatening conditions.

The report also includes powerful firsthand accounts from individuals affected by these policies. Ilia, a nonbinary Russian dissident, won their asylum case in court but remained in detention for over a year without a release date. Axel, a DACA recipient and youth leader, is abandoning his job to return to school amid uncertainty regarding his legal status. Beatriz, an immigrant lawyer advocating for noncitizen children, has encountered cases reminiscent of her own journey to the U.S., including a confused six-year-old who appeared in court without representation. Kaelyn is incurring debt to prevent her partner from being deported to El Salvador’s megaprison under the Alien Enemies Act.

The report warns that while some policies may shift in response to legal challenges, the administration’s overarching agenda remains clear: to permanently redefine who belongs in America and how power is wielded by the federal government.

“The administration’s policies are reshaping the immigration system in ways that are unfair, unlawful, and out of step with core American values,” said Dara Lind, senior fellow at the Council and co-author of the report. “We’re witnessing real harm to families, communities, and the rule of law, and the public deserves to understand what’s at stake.”

The full report is available for review, and interviews with experts and individuals impacted by these policies can also be arranged.

Source: Original article

Nearly Half of Fortune 500 Companies Founded by Immigrants or Their Children

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

Nearly half of the Fortune 500 companies in 2025 were founded by immigrants or their children, highlighting their significant impact on the U.S. economy.

WASHINGTON, DC, August 21, 2025 — A recent analysis of the 2025 Fortune 500 list reveals that 46.2 percent of America’s largest companies—231 out of 500—were founded by immigrants or their children. These companies collectively generated an impressive $8.6 trillion in revenue during the fiscal year 2024 and employed over 15.4 million people worldwide. This data underscores the crucial role that immigrants play in driving innovation, economic growth, and job creation in the United States.

This marks the highest percentage recorded since the American Immigration Council began tracking immigrant entrepreneurs in its annual reviews of the Fortune 500 list in 2011.

“Immigrants are a driving force behind America’s prosperity. We need immigration policies that reflect that, instead of investing billions of dollars into detention, deportation, and making it incredibly difficult for foreign workers to come here or even renew their visas. These reckless policies undermine America’s greatest competitive advantage: the talent and drive of immigrants,” said Nan Wu, director of research at the American Immigration Council.

Businesses founded by immigrants or their children have transformed various industries, including technology, retail, and media. Notable companies on the list include Amazon, Apple, NVIDIA, Levi Strauss & Co., Ace Hardware, and Sirius XM Holdings.

Key findings from the analysis reveal that in fiscal year 2024, the Fortune 500 companies founded by immigrants or their children generated $8.6 trillion in revenue. This revenue, if compared with national GDPs, would rank as the third-largest economy globally.

Furthermore, these companies employed over 15.4 million individuals, a workforce comparable to the population of the fifth-largest U.S. state. Immigrants and their children founded 80 percent of the Fortune 500 companies in professional and other services, 65.6 percent in manufacturing, and 57.5 percent in information technology.

Among the 14 companies making their debut on the Fortune 500 list this year, 10 were founded by immigrants or their children.

“Immigrants built nearly half of our Fortune 500 companies, created millions of jobs, and keep our economy competitive. And yet U.S. political leaders are making it increasingly difficult for foreign talent to come here or stay. It’s economic self-sabotage. If we want to stay the world’s innovation leader, we should be welcoming immigrants, not attacking them,” stated Steve Hubbard, senior data scientist at the American Immigration Council.

The American Immigration Council has experts available to provide further insights into the benefits that immigrants bring to the U.S. economy, both at the national and state levels.

Source: Original article

New Report Details Impact of Expanded Travel Ban on Indian-Americans

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

A new report highlights the significant economic and humanitarian impacts of the Trump administration’s expanded travel ban, which affects immigration from 19 countries.

WASHINGTON, DC, August 6 — A recent report from the American Immigration Council outlines the extensive economic and humanitarian consequences of the Trump administration’s travel ban, enacted in June 2025. This ban restricts immigration from 19 countries and poses a risk of losing $715 million in taxes and $2.5 billion in spending power.

In 2022, nearly 300,000 individuals from the affected countries entered the United States, contributing to critical sectors of the economy and generating substantial tax revenue. “Those affected by this travel ban are students, workers, and family members who pay taxes, support local economies, and fill jobs in industries facing massive shortages. We’re throwing all of that away, to the detriment of our communities and the U.S. economy,” said Nan Wu, research director of the American Immigration Council.

According to 2023 data, of the 300,000 individuals impacted by the travel ban, 82 percent were employed, particularly in industries already grappling with labor shortages, such as hospitality, construction, and manufacturing. The manufacturing sector alone is projected to face a shortage of 1.9 million workers by 2033.

“The United States absolutely needs strong screening procedures to protect national security, but this travel ban isn’t how you do that,” stated Jeremy Robbins, executive director of the American Immigration Council. “The Trump administration is trying to sell this policy as a security measure, but when you dig into the justifications, they don’t add up. Many of the targeted countries had fewer than 500 visa overstays last year. This isn’t about keeping America safe; it’s about keeping certain people out.”

While the 2017 travel ban sparked immediate and widespread public protests, the report notes that the 2025 version has encountered a more subdued response. This muted reaction is largely attributed to the ban’s gradual implementation and the introduction of expanded exemptions. However, the report emphasizes that the resulting damage remains severe.

“This quieter version of the ban is deeply harmful,” Robbins added. “It separates families, blocks international talent, and hurts communities across the country. The absence of airport protests doesn’t mean the harm isn’t real; it’s just happening more quietly and more bureaucratically.”

There are indications that the administration may consider adding an additional 36 countries to the travel ban. Should this occur, tens of thousands more individuals from those nations could be barred from entering the United States, exacerbating the economic, social, and diplomatic repercussions.

The countries currently affected by the travel ban include:

All travel banned:

Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.

Visas sharply restricted:

Venezuela, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, and Turkmenistan.

This report underscores the far-reaching implications of the travel ban, not only for those directly affected but also for the broader U.S. economy and society.

Source: Original article

Inside Training Facility for Recruits Addressing Trump’s Deportation Policies

Staff ReporterImmigration, Law/Legal 0

The Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Brunswick, Georgia, serves as the primary training hub for federal law enforcement officers, including those in Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) in Brunswick, Georgia, stands as a pivotal institution for the training of nearly all federal law enforcement officers in the United States. This facility plays a crucial role in preparing officers from various agencies, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which has been at the forefront of immigration enforcement and mass deportation initiatives during the Trump administration.

Established to enhance the quality of law enforcement training, FLETC provides a comprehensive curriculum that covers a wide array of topics essential for effective law enforcement. The center’s programs are designed to equip recruits with the skills necessary to navigate the complexities of federal law enforcement, particularly in areas such as immigration enforcement.

As the demand for immigration enforcement has increased, particularly under the policies implemented during the Trump era, the training provided at FLETC has become even more significant. Recruits undergo rigorous training that prepares them to handle the challenges associated with immigration enforcement, including the legal and ethical implications of their actions.

FLETC’s training programs emphasize not only the technical skills required for law enforcement but also the importance of understanding the communities they serve. This dual focus aims to foster a sense of responsibility and accountability among officers, particularly in sensitive areas such as immigration enforcement.

The facility’s role in shaping the future of federal law enforcement cannot be overstated. As ICE continues to play a central role in the enforcement of immigration laws, the training provided at FLETC will likely have lasting implications for both the officers and the communities they interact with.

In conclusion, the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Brunswick, Georgia, remains a critical institution in the training of federal law enforcement officers, particularly those involved in immigration enforcement. Its programs are essential in preparing recruits to meet the demands of their roles in an increasingly complex legal and social landscape, especially in the context of the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

Source: Original article

Indian-American Community Celebrates Cultural Heritage at Annual Festival

Staff ReporterCover, Immigration, USA 0

USCIS provides a comprehensive resource for news, updates, and statistics related to immigration and citizenship on its dedicated Newsroom webpage.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has established a centralized Newsroom webpage that serves as a vital resource for the public. This platform offers a variety of news releases and alerts, which are searchable by topic and date, ensuring that users can easily find the information they need.

In addition to news releases, the USCIS Newsroom includes updates on policies and procedures, as well as important announcements regarding office closures and other emergencies. This feature is particularly useful for individuals seeking timely information about USCIS operations.

For those interested in visual content, the Newsroom also hosts a Video and Image Gallery. This section provides access to images and videos that showcase USCIS operations, offering a behind-the-scenes look at the agency’s work.

Data enthusiasts will appreciate the Immigration and Citizenship Data page, which presents various categories of immigration data and statistics. This resource is essential for researchers, policymakers, and anyone looking to understand immigration trends in the United States.

USCIS maintains an active presence on social media, with several accounts dedicated to providing the latest updates and information. Following these accounts can help individuals stay informed about changes and announcements from the agency.

The Newsroom also features a section for recent speeches, statements, and congressional testimony from USCIS leadership. These documents are searchable by topic and date, allowing users to access important discussions and insights from agency officials.

For those seeking more in-depth information, the Electronic Reading Room offers access to documents identified under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Users can search for topics of interest using a convenient drop-down list, making it easier to find specific information.

USCIS understands the importance of communication with the media and has established a network of agency representatives across the country to respond to media inquiries. This ensures that journalists and the public can obtain accurate and timely information about immigration and citizenship matters.

Additionally, the Newsroom provides information about upcoming events, including local and national engagements. This feature allows the community to stay informed about opportunities to engage with USCIS and participate in discussions related to immigration issues.

Overall, the USCIS Newsroom is a comprehensive resource designed to keep the public informed about immigration and citizenship matters. By providing access to news, data, and multimedia content, USCIS aims to enhance transparency and communication with the community.

Source: Original article

US Embassy in India Ends Third-Party Passport Pickup Services

Staff ReporterImmigration, Visa 0

Effective immediately, the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi has ended third-party passport collection to enhance security for passports and visa documents.

NEW DELHI – The U.S. Embassy in New Delhi has announced the immediate discontinuation of third-party passport collection services in India. This change is part of a new security measure aimed at improving the safety of passports and supporting visa documents.

Under the new policy, all visa applicants are required to collect their passports in person from the embassy or a consulate. However, for minors, a parent or legal guardian may collect the passport on their behalf, provided they present an original, signed consent letter from both parents. It is important to note that scanned or emailed consent letters will not be accepted.

To accommodate those who may find it challenging to visit the embassy in person, the U.S. Embassy has introduced an alternative option. Applicants can choose to have their passports delivered to their home or office for a fee of ₹1,200. This delivery service can be selected by updating the document delivery preferences online.

The embassy has also provided guidance for applicants who may encounter technical issues during this process. They are encouraged to report any problems through the “Feedback/Requests” feature on their profile. It is advisable to include a screenshot of the error and specify the preferred delivery location. The embassy recommends that applicants avoid contacting the call center for these updates and instead refer to the official website or their Visa Application Home page for further information.

This policy change reflects the embassy’s commitment to ensuring the security of sensitive documents and enhancing the overall experience for visa applicants.

According to India-West, the U.S. Embassy’s decision underscores the importance of safeguarding personal information and maintaining the integrity of the visa application process.

Source: Original article

Revised Form I-129 for Nonimmigrant Workers Now Available

Staff ReporterImmigration, Visa 0

USCIS has released a revised edition of Form I-129, which will be the only accepted version starting May 1, 2015.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced the availability of a revised Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker. This updated form is dated October 23, 2014, and is now accessible for download on the USCIS forms website.

Beginning May 1, 2015, USCIS will only accept the October 23, 2014, edition of Form I-129. After this date, previous editions of the form, specifically those dated October 7, 2011, January 19, 2011, and November 23, 2010, will no longer be accepted.

The revision aims to enhance the completion process for applicants, ensuring that all necessary information is provided. USCIS encourages users to download the revised form to facilitate smoother processing and compliance with the updated requirements.

For more information on who may file Form I-129 and to access the revised document, visit the USCIS forms website.

Source: Original article

Nine Rohingya Nationals Arrested in India After 13 Years of Illegal Residency

Staff ReporterConflict, Immigration 0

Nine Rohingya individuals, who had been residing illegally in India for 13 years, were arrested near the Bangladesh border in Assam and are facing deportation.

In a recent development, nine members of the Rohingya community from Myanmar were detained near the India-Bangladesh border in Assam’s Cachar district. The group had allegedly entered India illegally nearly 13 years ago.

According to police officials, the group consists of two men, two women, one teenage girl, and four children. They had been living in various parts of India before traveling from Hyderabad to Cachar. Their journey culminated at Hilara Railway Station on Monday, after which they sought shelter near the international border.

Cachar Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Numal Mahatta confirmed that the detainees were apprehended from the Katigorah area on Tuesday evening, following a tip-off from intelligence sources.

“They have been staying in India for many years. Recently, they traveled here with the intention of living in this area. They did not attempt to cross the border, but our team intercepted them before they could settle here,” Mahatta stated in a media briefing.

The detainees revealed to the police that they had entered India from Bangladesh approximately 13 years ago and had worked in various states, including Jammu & Kashmir and Telangana. One of the detainees, Abu Bakkar Siddiqui, noted that while they originally hailed from Myanmar, their family members are currently in Bangladesh. “Due to the recent crackdown on migrant workers, we decided to return,” he explained.

Another detainee, Samsur Alam, claimed that they were aided by a human trafficking network that facilitated their journey to Assam and advised them to remain near the border. “We were told not to go out in the daytime, but we went to the market as we had no food,” he recounted.

Authorities have registered a case against the group and confirmed that they will be deported in accordance with directives from higher authorities.

As the situation unfolds, the plight of the Rohingya community continues to draw attention, highlighting ongoing issues related to migration and human rights in the region.

Source: Original article

US Lawmaker: H-1B Visas Key to Physician Shortage Solution

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

Congressman Greg Murphy emphasized the importance of H-1B visas in addressing the physician shortage in the U.S., a stance that ignited criticism and highlighted a contentious debate.

Congressman Greg Murphy, a Republican from North Carolina’s 3rd district, recently drew significant attention for his comments regarding the use of H-1B visas to address critical shortages in the U.S. healthcare system. Murphy, who is also a practicing physician, argued that foreign-trained medical graduates play an essential role, particularly in underserved rural areas, where the physician shortfall is most acute.

In a post on X, dated August 8, Murphy stated, “H1-B Visas are critical for helping alleviate the severe physician shortage this nation faces. We cannot train enough American Doctors fast enough. We can’t let lack of knowledge of the importance of this program affect patient care.”

This assertion by the 62-year-old lawmaker comes against the backdrop of an ongoing immigration debate in the United States, further inflamed by policy discussions under the Trump administration. Notably, information reported by The New York Times on July 26 cited Joseph Edlow, the then-new Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, who indicated that the administration might implement stricter H-1B guidelines.

Despite Murphy’s stance, his comments met with a wave of criticism, particularly on social media, where many disputed his claims. Several responses, predominantly from Trump supporters, challenged the notion that H-1B visas are indispensable for addressing physician shortages.

One user commented on the discrepancy between Murphy’s statement and the actual utilization of H-1B visas in North Carolina. “Congressman says H-1B is ‘critical’ to fix the doctor shortage. Reality: In NC, 97.7% of H-1Bs aren’t medical, and most of the 2.3% ‘medical’ roles aren’t doctors at all,” read one such comment.

Others highlighted that American medical graduates often face barriers to obtaining residency positions, suggesting that foreign medical graduates are prioritized over local students. “Actually, H-1Bs are not critical for the medical system,” one user argued. “We have American medical students who are denied residency programs because the medical establishment limits them.”

Such sentiments were echoed by individuals who contended that the residency cap set by Congress unfairly limits opportunities for American graduates, while universities allegedly favor international students who pay higher tuition fees. “This is demonstrably false. Universities have been discriminating against U.S. citizens because international students usually pay over double in-state tuition,” stated another commenter.

Another critical voice argued, “Nope. We are done with politicians putting Americans last. You want less qualified doctors instead of funding more residencies or ensuring that American students are given priority in school over foreigners.”

The U.S. faces a complex challenge in addressing its physician shortage, with arguments for and against the H-1B visa program reflecting broader tensions between immigration policy and domestic workforce development.

Indian Embassy Launches Consular Center in Edison

Staff ReporterCommunity, Immigration 0

A new Indian Consular Application Center has opened in Edison, New Jersey, providing essential services like passports and visas, improving accessibility for the Indian community in New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania.

The Indian Consular Application Center officially began offering services on August 1 at its location in Edison Square, Suite 1080, 2035 Lincoln Highway, also known as Route 27. Authorized by the Consulate General of India in New York, these services are managed by VFS Global, as indicated by township officials.

This center is one of several new facilities established across the country as part of a significant initiative to enhance service delivery and offer better support to the Indian community.

“We are proud to welcome the new Indian Consular Application Center to Edison,” said Mayor Sam Joshi. “This center not only improves essential services for our residents but also supports Edison’s businesses by boosting tourism, as it serves individuals from New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania.”

New Jersey hosts approximately half a million residents of Indian origin. This new center offers a convenient alternative for these individuals, eliminating the need to travel to New York to access essential services.

The Edison Indian Consular Application Center provides a wide array of services, including the issuance of passports and visas, and the processing of Overseas Citizenship of India applications and surrender certificates. The facility also handles Non-Resident Indian and Life certificates, certifications of birth, death, and marriage, police clearance certificates, and other formalities such as the Global Entry Program. It also offers document attestation, No Obligation to Return to India documentation, and registration of birth and marriage.

The center is scheduled to operate six days a week and includes numerous additional services within their fees, such as photographing for applications, photocopying supporting documents, assistance in form completion, and the provision of return courier services for completed applications.

According to MyCentralJersey.com, the establishment of this center represents a significant effort to make consular services more accessible to the Indian community residing in and around New Jersey.

Court Ruling Introduces Changes for Green-Card Applicants

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

A federal court ruling has clarified that EB-5 immigrant investors need to keep their capital at risk for two years, aligning with current policies and providing clarity in the green card process.

A recent federal court decision has marked a pivotal moment for foreign nationals seeking permanent residency in the United States through the EB-5 immigrant investor program. Under this ruling, EB-5 investors are no longer required to keep their investments “at risk” for longer than two years, affirming a current U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) policy and dismissing a legal challenge from a trade group representing regional investment centers.

The EB-5 visa program, introduced in 1990, offers wealthy foreign nationals a path to U.S. residency by investing in American projects. However, the program has faced criticism over potential abuses. The court’s decision helps reduce the financial and procedural uncertainties for applicants by providing a clear timeline on the investment risk period, which could significantly impact the thousands currently navigating U.S. immigration policy.

The recent ruling in Washington came after a lawsuit filed by Invest in the U.S.A. (IIUSA), an association of EB-5 regional centers. The IIUSA contended that the 2022 EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act (RIA) did not alter the existing requirement, which linked the investment period to the adjudication of conditional green card status, potentially compelling investors to keep their funds tied up indefinitely if the immigration process was delayed.

Judge Ana C. Reyes sided with the government and the American Immigrant Investor Alliance (AIIA), an organization advocating for immigrant investors. She declared that the 2022 RIA revised the law’s language regarding the sustainment period for capital investments. According to her order, EB-5 investors who made their investments post-March 2022 need to keep their money at risk for just two years after the capital is placed into an investment. This decision doesn’t apply to those who invested before the RIA, wherein the sustainment period begins after obtaining conditional lawful permanent residency, influenced by immigrant visa bulletin dates.

With this decision, USCIS is charged with drafting new regulations to formalize these rules, including a notice of proposed rulemaking and a period for public comment, a process that could span one to two years, or possibly longer. While USCIS’s existing policy on the EB-5 program will remain during this rulemaking period, the precise wording of these new regulations remains pending.

The discussion around the EB-5 program was notable even in political discourse, reflecting divided views among policymakers. President Donald Trump once suggested exchanging high investment amounts for U.S. citizenship in a speech, emphasizing the need to reform the program, which some officials considered fraught with fraud and inefficiencies.

In the meantime, advocacy groups supporting EB-5 investors continue to plan for active involvement and legislative reform efforts in Congress, ensuring the program maintains its integrity while being fair to investors and fulfilling broader economic development goals.

The current USCIS policy on the two-year sustainment for post-RIA investments continues to persist, maintaining the older standards for pre-RIA investors. The final regulatory outcomes may influence further legislative debate and reforms in the future.

Republican Senator Supports H-1B for Medical Field, Faces Criticism

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

Republican Senator Greg Murphy faced backlash on social media after asserting that H-1B visas are essential to addressing the shortage of physicians in the United States, particularly in rural areas.

Amid growing anti-H-1B sentiment in the United States, Republican Senator Greg Murphy sparked controversy on the social media platform X by stating that H-1B visas play a crucial role in mitigating the nation’s physician shortage. According to Murphy, who is also a physician, rural communities in particular struggle to attract American doctors, making foreign medical graduates indispensable in providing care.

“H1-B Visas are critical for helping alleviate the severe physician shortage this nation faces. We cannot train enough American Doctors fast enough. We can’t let lack of knowledge of the importance of this program to affect patient care,” Murphy stated. With a background in urology and a long medical career, Murphy has firsthand experience in international medical contexts. At the age of 20, he spent a summer in India working in a Catholic leprosy hospital and later engaged in medical missionary work in Haiti following the 2010 earthquake.

Murphy’s comments ignited backlash, with some critics labeling him as “out of touch” and accusing him of being “compromised by foreign lobby,” especially since the current sentiment among many Republicans is to halt these visa programs due to claims that they displace American graduates. One user argued that, “H1-B physicians are a tool for profit-maximizing used by corporate health systems and private equity-controlled medical groups. They like to hire foreign medical graduates because they tend not to complain about gross ethical problems, malpractice, and understaffing.”

The criticisms extended beyond concerns about job displacement, with several users on X advocating for strict reforms. “We don’t need any foreign physicians!!! What we need are mass deportations and visa reform!!! Also, DEI has been a disaster for medical schools. They’ve been discriminating against White students for years. No more foreigners!!!!” expressed another commentator.

Murphy also faced responses claiming deliberate misinformation. In one such response, a user said, “That is such a blatant lie. In reality, we just have H1B frauds with questionable backgrounds destroying the future of qualified Americans. Shame on you.”

Some critics contended that the focus should be on improving the conditions for American medical students, arguing that residency programs often admit foreign students instead of qualified Americans. “Actually, H-1Bs are not critical for the medical system. We have American medical students who are denied residency programs because the medical establishment limits them. Even after going $10s of thousands in debt and passing all their classes, these Americans are denied residency programs, while foreign students are admitted. That’s just wrong,” another user commented.

While the debate over H-1B visas predominantly swirls around the tech industry, given Silicon Valley’s reliance on foreign talent, the scrutiny has extended to medical fields as well. The controversy underscores the broader debate about the impact of foreign professionals on domestic employment and education opportunities.

According to Times of India, the current discussions highlight the tension between meeting immediate healthcare needs and addressing long-standing concerns about American workforce employment.

Canada PR Pathway: Jobs in 118 Companies Guarantee Residency

Staff ReporterImmigration, Economy 0

Canada has introduced a new pathway for skilled workers to gain employment and permanent residency, focusing on 118 designated employers in the West Kootenay region of British Columbia.

In a bid to attract skilled workers and provide them with opportunities for permanent residency, Canada has unveiled a new immigration route, emphasizing its commitment to filling labor shortages in smaller communities. The initiative is centered on the Rural and Northern Immigration Pilot (RNIP), also known locally as the Rural Community Immigration Pilot (RCIP).

The RNIP targets skilled workers looking to settle and work in the West Kootenay region of British Columbia, where 118 designated employers have been identified to participate in this program. This focus aims to address industry-specific labor shortages while benefiting both employers in need of skilled workers and immigrating individuals seeking to establish themselves in Canada.

By participating in this pilot, designated employers in the West Kootenay area are positioned to recruit skilled international workers who will fill existing gaps in the workforce. This move is part of a broader strategy to stimulate economic growth and support community development in regions that traditionally grapple with attracting and retaining a skilled labor force.

The initiative not only provides skilled workers with employment opportunities but also facilitates a streamlined process for gaining permanent residency. The focus on smaller communities aims to balance out population growth, enabling these areas to thrive and flourish by securing the human resources necessary for key industries.

According to Zee News, this program is part of Canada’s ongoing efforts to refine its immigration policies, making them more responsive to the needs of local economies while offering viable long-term residency solutions to foreign skilled workers looking to contribute to Canada’s socio-economic landscape.

Judge Blocks Trump Birthright Citizenship Order Nationwide

Staff ReporterImmigration, Cover, Nation 0

A federal judge appointed by President Joe Biden has issued a nationwide injunction against former President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, citing constitutional conflicts.

In a decisive legal move, U.S. District Judge Deborah L. Boardman delivered a ruling that blocks former President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, a directive which had sought to deny citizenship documents to certain groups of children born in the United States. Boardman’s decision, announced Thursday, underscores the provision of the Fourteenth Amendment and contends with existing Supreme Court precedent.

Boardman’s ruling supports a class-action lawsuit filed by the immigration rights group, CASA. The judge determined that the plaintiffs presented a strong case for a class-wide preliminary injunction, arguing that the executive order’s contradiction of the Constitution justified this legal remedy. “The plaintiffs have established that they are likely to succeed on the merits of their constitutional claim,” Boardman elaborated in her opinion.

The injunction aims to prevent the irreparable harm of denying citizenship to the children affected by the executive order. Boardman noted that maintaining the current state of birthright citizenship aligns with public interest and equity considerations, emphasizing that the government’s position would not be adversely affected by upholding the status quo pending the resolution of the lawsuit.

This ruling marks the fourth instance of a federal judge imposing such an injunction on Trump’s executive order, following a Supreme Court ruling in June. Trump’s directive, unveiled at the start of his second term, had insisted that U.S. agencies refuse citizenship documentation to children born to unauthorized immigrants, or those without at least one parent being a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.

Initially, the executive order faced swift challenges from lower courts before progressing to the Supreme Court’s review. In May, the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision addressed the scope of lower courts’ authority to implement nationwide injunctions, rather than directly tackling the executive order’s validity. This prompted a wave of legal responses from various advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and CASA, who adjusted their legal approaches in line with the Court’s guidance on seeking class-action lawsuits.

According to The Washington Post, these developments signal ongoing judicial resistance to changes proposed under the Trump administration concerning citizenship rights.

US Green Card Numbers to Increase Under New Proposal

Staff ReporterCover, Immigration, Visa 0

Lawmakers have introduced the Dignity Act of 2025, a bipartisan proposal aiming to increase green card availability and enact comprehensive immigration reforms.

The Dignity Act of 2025, or H.R. 4393, has been presented in Congress as a new initiative to address ongoing issues within the U.S. immigration system. This proposed legislation seeks to enhance the availability of green cards to immigrants and includes a variety of reforms to address visa backlogs and the legal status of Dreamers while also implementing significant changes to border security and verification rules.

Introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on July 15, 2025, by Representatives Maria Elvira Salazar, a Republican from Florida, and Veronica Escobar, a Democrat from Texas, the bill represents a rare bipartisan effort to tackle immigration reform. The Dignity Act proposes a multitude of border security measures and revisions aimed at expanding access to permanent residency.

The legislation outlines a pathway for those brought to the U.S. as minors and recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) to adjust their status to that of lawful permanent residents. This transition would depend on meeting certain criteria, including graduating from college or a technical school, serving for three years in the U.S. military, or maintaining four years of consistent employment with a valid work permit.

Additionally, the act aims to expedite the legal visa process, targeting a reduction in visa backlogs to a maximum of 10 years. Those who have been waiting in employment or family-based visa backlogs for over a decade would have the option to pay a $20,000 fee for expedited processing. To further alleviate delays, the bill proposes to raise the per-country cap from 7 percent to 15 percent of the annual total for both employment-based and family-sponsored green cards. This increase is intended to ease country-specific bottlenecks that particularly affect applicants from India and China, who currently face extended wait times compared to other nationalities.

The latest figures indicate that approximately 1.17 million people obtained green cards in 2023, marking a 15.2 percent increase from the previous year due to modifications in pandemic restrictions and immigration policy. The majority of these green cards (64.6 percent) were family-sponsored, with employment-based categories accounting for 16.7 percent.

Florida Representative Maria Elvira Salazar emphasized the significance of the Dignity Act, remarking, “The Dignity Act is a revolutionary bill that offers the solution to our immigration crisis: secure the border, stop illegal immigration, and provide an earned opportunity for long-term immigrants to stay here and work. No amnesty. No handouts. No citizenship. Just accountability and a path to stability for our economy and our future.”

In terms of legislative progress, the Dignity Act of 2025 is currently under review by multiple House committees, including the Judiciary and Homeland Security, as it moves forward in the legislative process.

Source: Original article

US Visa Bond Program Restricts Airports for Travelers

Staff ReporterUSA, Immigration 0

Beginning in 2025, the U.S. will implement a visa bond program requiring certain international travelers to enter and exit through designated airports, potentially posting bonds up to $15,000, alongside a new visa fee.

By August 20, 2025, the United States will launch a new visa bond program targeting nationals from countries with high rates of visa overstays. Applicants for a B-1/B-2 tourist or business visa may be required to post a refundable bond that ranges between $5,000 and $15,000. In addition to this financial requirement, they will be allowed to enter and exit the country only via an exclusive list of U.S. airports.

The aim of these restrictions is to more closely monitor compliance with visa terms. The U.S. Department of State asserts that the new requirements will facilitate the tracking and potential apprehension of travelers who may overstay their visas. However, civil rights and travel advocacy groups argue that the policy may lead to profiling and discourage legitimate travel for tourism, study, and business purposes.

This latest move is expected to complicate logistics for airlines, as they will now be tasked with verifying eligibility for both visa and airport restrictions.

In a parallel initiative, the U.S. is preparing to introduce a $250 Visa Integrity Fee, applicable to all nonimmigrant visa categories, including those for tourists, students, temporary workers, and exchange visitors. This fee will be mandatory in addition to both the visa bond, where applicable, and existing standard application fees.

The Visa Integrity Fee is scheduled to take effect on October 1, 2025, adding yet another financial burden to prospective travelers.

Both the bond program and integrity fee mark significant shifts in U.S. visa policy. For travelers from affected countries, the expense and logistical challenges of visiting the U.S. may serve as a substantial deterrent. The requirement to use specific airports adds a further layer of scrutiny and inconvenience. Although billed as temporary pilot programs, critics note that the infrastructure being established indicates these measures might extend beyond the current administration.

According to Live and Let’s Fly, these developments suggest a long-term strategy to reshape U.S. visa management.

H-1B Workers Issued Notices Despite 60-Day Grace Period

Staff ReporterImmigration, Cover, Politics 0

H-1B visa holders who have faced employment termination are receiving Notices to Appear from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, raising concerns over the enforcement of the 60-day grace period.

H-1B beneficiaries are encountering complexities as U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issues Notices to Appear, despite the supposed protection granted by the 60-day grace period following employment separation. These charging documents instruct the affected foreign workers to appear before an immigration judge, initiating removal proceedings based on specified legal grounds and allegations.

According to the rules governing the H-1B visa, if a worker’s employment ends, either voluntarily or involuntarily, they, alongside their dependents, are required to leave the United States within 60 days or by the end of their visa’s authorized validity period, depending on which is shorter. This grace period allows nonimmigrant workers to pursue a change in nonimmigrant status or adjust their status without having to immediately exit the country. The objective is to provide these individuals a window to maintain their lawful status or seek new employment opportunities within the United States.

However, despite the protective intent of the 60-day rule, some H-1B visa holders have been receiving Notices to Appear, prompting significant concern among foreign workers in the United States. The regulations state that nonimmigrant employees should not be deemed as having failed to maintain their status solely because their employment ceased, within the stipulated timeline. Yet, the discretionary power granted under these regulations to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appears to complicate this assurance.

The relevant provisions also state that DHS has the authority to eliminate or reduce the 60-day grace period as a discretionary measure. During this period, foreign workers are not permitted to engage in employment unless explicitly authorized. These considerations are crucial for H-1B visa holders who are between jobs or planning career transitions in the U.S., especially in light of changes implemented by the previous administration under President Trump.

Such developments have emphasized the need for H-1B visa holders to be acutely aware of the evolving regulations and potential uncertainties they might face in maintaining their immigration status. According to NAFSA: Association of International Educators, the dynamic regulatory environment necessitates vigilance and proactive planning by affected individuals.

Trump Visa Policy Disrupts Students Before Classes Begin

Staff ReporterHealth/Education, Immigration, News 0

International students are facing considerable delays in securing U.S. visas, a situation that risks disrupting college budgets nationwide as the Trump administration takes a hardline stance on immigration.

As the start of the academic year approaches, universities across the United States are dealing with the fallout of significant delays in student visa processing. The Trump administration’s recent immigration policies have added to the challenges, leaving many international students in limbo and potentially impacting university finances due to diminished enrollments.

Arizona State University, one of the many institutions bearing the brunt of visa delays, revealed that around 1,000 incoming international students still need their visas. The resulting budgetary impact could amount to “tens of millions of dollars,” according to the university’s president. Similarly, Furman University in South Carolina is already bracing for lower enrollment numbers this fall due to the situation abroad, prompting contingency plans like offering students the chance to start their studies in locations such as London.

The interplay of President Donald Trump’s immigration policies and higher education strategies has elevated concerns among both private and public colleges, which warn that such measures could dampen international student enrollment. This potential decrease in students poses a substantial financial threat to institutions, as international students typically pay full tuition.

Cornell University’s Vice Provost for International Affairs, Wendy Wolford, voiced concerns about international students struggling to procure visas promptly. Approximately a quarter of Cornell’s student body comprises international students, making the issue particularly pressing for the institution.

Preliminary forecasts by NAFSA: Association of International Educators and JB International estimate a 30% drop in first-time foreign student enrollment on U.S. campuses this fall. This decline could spell a loss of approximately $2.6 billion in tuition revenue across the country, according to Shorelight, an international education organization.

The situation has visibly affected visa issuance in key markets such as India, where a notable drop in the number of student visas issued has been observed. A significant disparity exists, with Chinese students receiving visas at a rate seven times higher than their Indian counterparts, as noted by an official at a prominent private university.

Families like one from New Delhi, whose daughter plans to study in the U.S., have found themselves caught in the bureaucratic snarl. The student had initially secured a visa appointment before the temporary pause on interviews, yet she was still denied a visa under section 214(b), which questions the applicant’s intent to return to their home country. As securing another visa appointment proved futile, the family has considered alternative arrangements, such as enrolling at the University of Edinburgh instead.

A State Department spokesperson acknowledged the dynamic nature of visa interview scheduling, mentioning that expedited appointments are assessed individually. However, the delays have emerged as more disruptive than the pandemic itself, as per Arizona State University President Michael Crow. The institution estimates that one-third of its incoming international students have yet to receive their visas.

An admissions official at a small private college echoed this sentiment, noting the unprecedented number of international students without visas this year. Typically, only a few students would be in this predicament, but currently, around 10 are still waiting for visas, a significant figure for a college with less than 100 international students annually.

Furman University also forecasts a decrease in new student enrollments this fall semester, with a notable reason being a drop in international student numbers caused by persistent issues with the U.S. visa process, as noted in their bond documents. Their expected freshmen count for the new academic year stands at 562, a decrease from 613 the previous year.

The pause in visa interviews, announced in late May by the Trump administration, came shortly after most colleges’ enrollment deadlines. Although interviews resumed in mid-June, the process remains painstakingly slow, according to Tom Dretler, CEO of Shorelight, with resumption occurring variably by country, city, and consulate.

The visa backlog has prompted questions from members of Congress, particularly regarding Indian students, a significant international student demographic for the U.S. The U.S. embassy in India has indicated that new appointments for student or exchange visitor visas will be severely limited for the foreseeable future.

In Gurgaon, Adarsh Khandelwal, co-founder of Collegify, a college counseling firm, has observed virtually no visa appointments opening for his clients this year. This has compelled about 60% of his students, who had planned to start their studies in the U.S. this fall, to turn to alternative options or defer their plans.

As universities work to mitigate the impact, some are formulating backup plans. The University of Arizona is testing a London site for students unable to travel to the U.S., while Northeastern University is exploring remote learning opportunities or possible enrollment at its overseas campuses. The University of Toronto’s Munk School is also an option for Harvard Kennedy School graduates encountering visa hurdles.

The issue may extend beyond this fall, affecting future enrollment and colors how international students perceive studying in the U.S., as noted by Daniel Santos from Prepory—a college admissions service. The confidence in U.S. higher education systems seems to be waning among prospective international students.

Source: Original article

Policy enhancements aim to prevent aliens who are males from being authorized to participate in women’s sports in the United States

Staff ReporterImmigration, Cover, Editorial/Opinion 0

WASHINGTON— U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is issuing guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual in alignment with Executive Order 14201, Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports, which directs the Department of Homeland Security to develop policies to prevent the entry of male athletes seeking to compete in women’s sports. USCIS will affirmatively protect all-female athletic opportunities by granting certain athlete-related petitions and applications, that had previously been abused and offered to men, only to women, ensuring that male aliens seeking immigration benefits aren’t coming to the U.S. to participate in women’s sports.

USCIS has clarified eligibility for certain visa categories: O-1A aliens of extraordinary ability, E11 aliens of extraordinary ability, E21 aliens of exceptional ability, and for national interest waivers (NIWs), to guarantee an even playing field for all women’s athletics in the United States.

“Men do not belong in women’s sports. USCIS is closing the loophole for foreign male athletes whose only chance at winning elite sports is to change their gender identity and leverage their biological advantages against women,” said USCIS Spokesperson Matthew Tragesser. “It’s a matter of safety, fairness, respect, and truth that only female athletes receive a visa to come to the U.S. to participate in women’s sports. The Trump Administration is standing up for the silent majority who’ve long been victims of leftist policies that defy common sense.”

This policy update clarifies that USCIS considers the fact that a male athlete has been competing against women as a negative factor in determining whether the alien is among the small percentage at the very top of the field; USCIS does not consider a male athlete who has gained acclaim in men’s sports and seeks to compete in women’s sports in the United States to be seeking to continue work in his area of extraordinary ability; male athletes seeking to enter the country to compete in women’s sports do not substantially benefit the United States; and it is not in the national interest to the United States to waive the job offer and, thus, the labor certification requirement for male athletes whose proposed endeavor is to compete in women’s sports.

The guidance, in Volumes 2 and 6 of the USCIS Policy Manual, is effective immediately and applies to benefit requests pending or filed on or after the publication date, is controlling, and supersedes any related prior guidance.

For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow us on X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, YouTube, Facebook and LinkedIn.

OPT Changes Could Impact Indian Talent, US Tech Economy

Staff ReporterImmigration, Technology 0

The potential elimination of the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program poses a significant threat not only to international students, particularly those from India, but also to the U.S. technology sector that relies heavily on skilled foreign talent.

In Washington, the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program is currently under scrutiny as potential legislation threatens its future. H.R. 2315, known as the “Fairness for High-Skilled Americans Act of 2023,” was introduced by Republican Congressman Paul Gosar on April 10, 2023. The bill, now under committee review, seeks to terminate the post-study work rights for international students on F-1 visas. Advocates of the bill argue OPT serves as a “shadow guestworker program,” but its opponents warn of significant consequences for the U.S. economy and global talent dynamics.

The OPT program allows international students to gain work experience in their field of study after graduation. According to the 2024 SEVIS “By the Numbers” report by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 194,554 students were on OPT in 2024, a 21.1% increase from 2023. This included 95,384 students on a 24-month STEM-OPT extension, with Indian students comprising 48% of these participants—the equivalent of nearly 45,800 engineers, coders, analysts, and scientists contributing to American firms.

The critics of OPT often argue that it displaces U.S. graduates, but proponents emphasize that the tech economy relies on international expertise, with Indian students playing a crucial role. In 2024 alone, Amazon hired 5,379 OPT students and 6,632 STEM-OPT extension workers, with other tech giants like Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Tesla also employing thousands from this talent pool. Companies like Citigroup, Oracle, Bloomberg, Qualcomm, and NVIDIA are among the top STEM-OPT employers, offering roles in pivotal fields such as AI, cybersecurity, and quantum computing.

Should OPT be eliminated, Indian students will face substantial challenges. Without the program, they lose a valuable pathway to work experience, debt repayment, and career advancement. OPT serves as a critical bridge to the H-1B visa and long-term employment in the U.S. The financial implications are also severe; Indian students often invest between $60,000 and $100,000 in a U.S. STEM degree, and without OPT, the return on this investment becomes questionable.

University enrollment from Indian students has already shown signs of decline, decreasing by over 28% from March 2024 to March 2025, according to SEVIS data. This trend highlights the potential fallout if the OPT program is dissolved. Without the program, international students may seek opportunities in other countries with more accessible pathways, like Canada or Germany, causing a ripple effect on U.S. educational revenues and innovation.

Supporters of the bill argue that OPT is a backdoor to employment, asserting that the U.S. should prioritize local workers. However, critics suggest the bill could undermine the U.S.’s competitive edge and innovation by cutting off a critical supply of skilled labor. Many influential figures in tech, such as Google’s Sundar Pichai and IBM’s Arvind Krishna, began their U.S. careers on F-1 visas with OPT, further underscoring its importance to cultivating industry leadership.

The debate over OPT encapsulates a broader discussion about the balance between immigration policy and economic growth. The elimination of OPT not only threatens the dreams of international students but could also have a significant adverse impact on America’s tech future, university funding, and its innovation pipeline, which depends heavily on global talent.

In conclusion, the termination of the OPT program may have far-reaching consequences that extend beyond student hardships. It risks damaging the U.S.’s competitiveness, labor market, and position as a global leader in tech and innovation—concerns supported by organizations such as the Business Roundtable, TechNet, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who have opposed the proposed legislation.

According to The Times of India, the situation remains fluid as the bill undergoes further review. Its outcome will significantly influence not only international students but also the very fabric of the U.S. tech economy.

US to Revoke Student Visas for Class, Program Absences

Staff ReporterImmigration, Cover, Education 0

The U.S. government has cautioned international students that failing to comply with student visa regulations could result in the revocation of their visas and disqualification from future U.S. visa applications.

The United States has issued a stern warning to international students, emphasizing the significant repercussions of violating student visa standards. This advisory was disseminated via the official X handle of the U.S. Mission in Nigeria on Monday. The warning underscores that students who fail to attend classes, drop out, or exit their academic programs without duly informing their educational institutions may face the revocation of their U.S. student visas.

Moreover, these violations could also lead to disqualification from obtaining future U.S. visas, according to the message. The U.S. Mission strongly advised all student visa holders to comply strictly with the terms of their visas. Maintaining academic status and adhering to regulations are crucial to prevent any immigration complications.

The advisory clearly stated the importance of keeping educational institutions informed of any changes in academic status. It read, “If you drop out, skip classes, or leave your programs of study without informing your school, your student visa may be revoked, and you may lose eligibility for future U.S. visas.”

The U.S. government urges students to “always adhere to the terms of your visa and maintain your student status to avoid any issues,” highlighting the importance of compliance with visa regulations for international students in the United States.

This advisory serves as a reminder for the thousands of international students studying in the U.S. who rely on their student visas to continue their education. It is essential for these students to understand and fulfil all conditions attached to their visa status to prevent any unforeseen immigration issues that could impede their academic pursuits.

According to Punch, these directives form part of broader measures to ensure that international students in the United States adhere to the stipulations of their visa agreements.

Indians Opt for US Investment Visas Amid H-1B Challenges

Staff ReporterImmigration, Money, U.S., Visa 0

As hurdles for H-1B and student visas grow, Indian citizens increasingly turn to U.S. investment visas, notably the EB-5, as a pathway to permanent residency.

The EB-5 visa program is attracting unprecedented interest from Indian citizens amid tightening immigration policies under the Trump administration. As details remain scarce about the forthcoming Gold Card visa, which was announced by President Donald Trump in February, the existing EB-5 visa — aimed at immigrant investors — has seen a surge in applications from India, reaching all-time highs, according to recent data.

The American Immigrant Investor Alliance (AIIA) reports a significant increase in demand for the EB-5 visa from Indian applicants starting in April 2024. This spike is attributed to stricter controls on student and temporary work visas. The United States Immigration Fund (USIF), which manages several EB-5 regional centers, corroborates these findings. Nicholas Mastroianni III, president and CMO of USIF, noted that in the first four months of the fiscal year 2025, Indian applicants filed over 1,200 I-526E petitions, exceeding the figures for any previous full year.

Experts link the rising interest in the EB-5 program to extensive backlogs in other immigration categories, such as the H-1B visa and green cards, with more than 11 million U.S. immigration applications currently pending. This context has positioned the EB-5 visa as one of the fastest and most reliable routes to achieving permanent U.S. residency.

The city of Mumbai is at the forefront of this surge, with data from Invest In the USA (IIUSA) reporting that 1,428 EB-5 visas were issued to Indians in FY2024, up from 815 in FY2023. The majority of these applications were processed through the U.S. consulate in Mumbai. Over the period from October 2024 to May 2025, 543 out of 638 unreserved consular processing applicants used the Mumbai consulate.

Approval rates for Indian applicants have shown a positive trajectory over the years. As per Ravneit Kaur Brar, an attorney-at-law based in California, the approval rate rose from 59% in FY2022 to 82% in FY2024. Projects in rural areas typically take between eight to 24 months to process, while those in high-unemployment areas may take from 12 to 30 months.

Mastroianni noted a significant uptick in interest following the Gold Card announcement, suggesting that uncertainty regarding future visa programs, alongside more stringent regulations on traditional student and work visa paths, has prompted many Indian investors to pursue the EB-5 visa sooner rather than later. “We are witnessing one of the most promising surges in EB-5 interest from Indian families in recent history,” said Mastroianni. He emphasized that this rise in demand is coupled with a growing sense of determination among applicants. “With the spectre of visa retrogression looming and the current ability to file concurrently from within the U.S., families are prioritizing stability, permanence, and long-term security. EB-5 is no longer seen as an alternative — it has become the preferred strategy.”

According to Financial Express, these trends indicate a shifting landscape in immigration preferences and strategies, particularly among Indian citizens seeking greater reliability and security in their residency plans.

Green Card Update Announced for Married Couples by Immigration Officials

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released updated policy guidance affecting the evaluation of family-based immigrant visa petitions as part of its efforts to enhance the integrity of the process.

The new policy guidance from USCIS, effective as of August 1, targets how family-based immigrant visa petitions—commonly utilized by married couples seeking green cards—are assessed. The updated procedures aim to address fraudulent or non-meritorious petitions that could undermine confidence in lawful pathways to permanent resident status in the United States.

The policy now stands as a crucial development given the backdrop of a reported 11.3 million pending applications that USCIS is currently handling. As part of these efforts, USCIS emphasized that the acceptance of such a petition does not automatically confer legal immigration status on the beneficiary. USCIS may issue a Notice to Appear in removal proceedings should a beneficiary be identified as otherwise removable under U.S. immigration laws.

This update seeks to bring clarity to existing protocols and empower the agency in evaluating the authenticity of marriage-based and other family-related immigration petitions. These pathways serve spouses and immediate relatives pursuing lawful permanent residency. The guidance provides detailed criteria on eligibility, necessary documentation, interview processes, and the handling of multiple or interconnected petitions. It also specifies the conditions under which these petitions may be referred to other government entities.

A significant portion of the updated document elucidates the process for forwarding approved petitions to the Department of State’s National Visa Center. This is particularly pertinent if a beneficiary originally aimed to adjust their status within the U.S. but was subsequently deemed ineligible.

The policy further elaborates on scenarios where U.S. citizens, particularly those involved in military service or overseas government assignments, might file Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative, directly with the Department of State. This filing is available under specific scenarios, especially in reaction to extensive disruptive events.

USCIS, in its press release, articulated that enhancing its capacity to verify eligible marriages and family connections is pivotal in maintaining compliance with the law. A principal focus of the updated policy is on fortifying alien screening processes to safeguard national security by identifying individuals with malicious intent for removal.

Morgan Bailey, a partner at Mayer Brown and a former senior official at the Department of Homeland Security, previously remarked to Newsweek on the perception of USCIS by the Trump administration. They emphasized that the administration viewed the primary role of USCIS as a screening and vetting body rather than one that distributes immigration benefits.

The updated policy is already in effect, as USCIS continues to navigate the complexities of its backlog while prioritizing immigration integrity and security.

Indian Migration Challenges: West Attracts as India Faces Exodus

Staff ReporterImmigration, Opinion 0

An Indian software consultant in Sweden has sparked a discussion on why many Indians who leave the country are reluctant to return, citing a wide array of advantages and disadvantages between living in India versus the West.

Ankur, a software development consultant based in Sweden, recently ignited a lively debate on social media regarding the longstanding question of why Indians often choose to remain abroad rather than return home. His commentary, shared via X, came in response to a post by Dr. Rajeshwari Iyer, an Indo-American who compared Indian and Chinese immigrants in the West. Dr. Iyer observed that while Chinese immigrants often return to their home country, Indians seem to prefer staying abroad.

Ankur’s extensive 20-point analysis of the situation includes both attractions of the West and deterrents within India that influence this decision. Opening his argument, Ankur highlighted the disparities in pay and living standards between the regions. He pointed out that Western countries provide “reliable basics” like consistent electricity, clean water, and fast internet, which are significant factors when Indians consider where to reside long-term.

Among the attractions listed, Ankur mentioned the higher quality of life, including better health and safety standards, as well as a significant economic advantage in terms of “dollar savings and stock options,” which help in wealth accumulation. He argued that such benefits draw Indians toward Western countries, which he described as more meritocratic with stronger passports compared to India’s offerings.

Ankur contends that India actively pushes people away through systemic inefficiencies. His list starts with the country’s notorious red tape, which can delay processes by weeks or even months. This bureaucratic inefficiency is often compounded by corruption and inconsistent changes in policy, tax, and import rules, which further frustrate residents.

The consultant also addressed the lack of civic sense among the general population, noting that issues like littering and public spitting are prevalent. Additionally, infrastructural weaknesses such as broken pavements, frequent power outages, inadequate public transportation, and water shortages are critical considerations for Indians abroad contemplating a return.

An absence of meritocracy in India was another critical point in Ankur’s critique. He cited social issues like hooliganism and moral policing as factors that deter potential returnees, further enhancing the appeal of residing in Western environments.

In summing up his argument, Ankur drew a stark comparison between women’s safety in the West and in India. He asserted that women’s safety “after dark” is far better in Western countries and claimed that due to safety concerns, “99% of Indian women never want to come back permanently.”

Ankur encapsulated his points by acknowledging the emotional complexities the diaspora faces in making such decisions. He concluded that the attractions of living abroad often seem more compelling than the emotional ties to India, influencing many Indians to choose not to return home permanently.

According to New India Abroad, Ankur’s insights have prompted widespread reflection among Indians both domestically and overseas, fueling discussion about the factors that continue to drive migration from India toward Western nations.

Indian Americans Concerned About New Big Beautiful Law

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

President Donald Trump has signed the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” a sweeping piece of legislation that overhauls the U.S. tax code, expands spending on defense and border security, and introduces new industry incentives, all while contributing an estimated $3 trillion to the national deficit over the next decade.

As Americans celebrated the 249th anniversary of their nation’s founding, President Donald Trump enacted a nearly 900-page piece of legislation known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill.” This comprehensive reform affects the U.S. tax system, increases funding for defense, border security, and infrastructure, and provides various industry-specific incentives and subsidies. Despite these changes, the legislation will likely add $3 trillion to the national deficit within the next ten years.

While the bill encompasses a wide array of provisions impacting all Americans, it poses particular challenges for immigrant communities, including Indian Americans. Of significant concern is the allocation of $170 billion for border security and immigration enforcement. Within this, $75 billion is designated for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), an agency that has faced criticism for its aggressive tactics concerning undocumented immigrants.

Indian nationals, who make up approximately 6% of the U.S. immigrant population, are particularly impacted. The Indian diaspora has already witnessed alarming enforcement actions, with dozens of undocumented Indian immigrants deported earlier this year. The expansion of ICE funding heightens fears that such deportations could increase in frequency.

It’s not just undocumented immigrants who are affected; the legislation has also triggered anxiety among Indian nationals legally residing in the country on H-1B visas. More than a million Indian nationals are currently caught in a significant green card backlog, attributed to a legislative cap that limits employment-based green cards from any single country to 7% of the annual total of 140,000. This translates to only 9,800 green cards annually for Indian applicants, many of whom are highly skilled workers, leading to wait times that could extend for decades.

The exact impact of the new legislation on H-1B holders remains to be seen, yet there is heightened concern. The “America First” ideology, which opposes foreign labor, combined with increasing scrutiny of visas, raises fears of stricter enforcement. Indian students with F-1 visas also experience growing vulnerability amid increased enforcement of policies against campus protests and free speech.

Beyond immigration issues, there are financial provisions in the law that affect diaspora households, notably a 1% tax on international remittances starting next year. Although initially proposed at a 5% rate, intense lobbying from the money transfer industry led to its reduction. Remittances from the U.S. to India, estimated to range between $25 billion to $29 billion annually, represent the largest total sent from any one country.

The legislation also proposes substantial reductions in critical public services, including a $1 trillion cut in Medicaid spending over the next decade, potentially leaving 10 million more Americans without health insurance coverage. Despite a perception of affluence among Indian Americans, many families, especially recent immigrants or those in lower-wage jobs, rely heavily on public health programs for essential services.

On a broader scale, the macroeconomic implications of the bill have been criticized for exacerbating the federal debt, which already stands at over $36 trillion. From visa holders facing an increasingly hostile immigration environment to families dependent on remittances and public health programs, the wide-reaching effects of the new law are deeply personal.

In its effort to emphasize “America First,” the “One Big Beautiful Bill” may inadvertently alienate many, including Indian Americans who have long pursued the American dream.

Trump Proposes Revoking Birthright Citizenship in New Plan

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration, Politics 0

The Supreme Court recently allowed the federal government to develop plans to revoke birthright citizenship for children of certain immigrants, potentially leading to significant changes in U.S. citizenship policy.

In a move that raises fundamental questions about constitutional rights in the United States, the Supreme Court has enabled the Trump administration to begin formulating plans to end birthright citizenship for some children of immigrants. This policy shift targets approximately 150,000 babies born each year who have traditionally been granted automatic citizenship under the 14th Amendment since 1868.

Following the Supreme Court’s decision in June, an immigration agency unveiled the initial phase of its strategy to enforce this dramatic alteration in citizenship policy. This proposal includes the possibility of revoking citizenship from the children of immigrants without permanent legal status, as well as those whose parents are lawful residents, including visa holders, Dreamers, and asylum-seekers.

The plan suggests that there will be a federal review process of parents’ legal status, possibly taking place in hospitals shortly after childbirth. This approach could profoundly affect the lives of children born in the U.S., who might face deportation to countries they have never visited, leaving them in a state of statelessness.

This development follows a series of federal court decisions that initially blocked the administration’s efforts to change birthright citizenship. The courts previously deemed the executive order as unconstitutional. However, the Supreme Court’s recent ruling has shifted the legal landscape, allowing the government to pursue these plans further.

The implications of this policy are far-reaching, influencing the lives of many children born on American soil and challenging longstanding interpretations of the 14th Amendment. The proposed changes have sparked widespread debate over the nature of citizenship and constitutional rights in the United States.

The details of the implementation plan, released in a bureaucratic memo, have drawn significant attention due to their potential impact on the nation’s immigration and citizenship framework. The memo’s language suggests a deliberate intention to impose these changes, despite the complex legal and human rights issues involved.

According to Slate, this policy could lead many individuals, raised and living their entire lives in the U.S., to face removal to countries with which they have no connection, or to a future in legal uncertainty.

Source: Original article

DOJ to Prioritize Revoking Citizenship Cases

Staff ReporterElection, Immigration 0

The Justice Department has intensified its focus on denaturalization, aiming to strip U.S. citizenship from naturalized citizens involved in certain criminal activities, according to a recent memo directing attorneys to prioritize such cases.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is placing a strong emphasis on denaturalization efforts, targeting naturalized Americans who have committed certain crimes, as per a June 11 memo. The initiative grants U.S. attorneys broader discretion in pursuing these cases and is aimed at individuals who were not born in the United States. According to 2023 data, there are nearly 25 million immigrants who hold naturalized citizenship.

One recent example of this policy in action is the case of Elliott Duke, a military veteran originally from the United Kingdom. Duke, who uses they/them pronouns, has had their citizenship revoked after being convicted of distributing child sexual abuse material, an activity they admitted to engaging in before becoming a U.S. citizen.

Denaturalization, a tactic that saw significant use during the McCarthy era and more recently under former Presidents Obama and Trump, is employed to remove citizenship from individuals who may have lied about criminal backgrounds or affiliations with illegal organizations on their applications. The current directive from Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate indicates that such proceedings will be a top priority for the DOJ’s Civil Division.

“The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence,” Shumate noted in the memo.

This focus on denaturalization marks the latest step by the Trump administration to transform the U.S. immigration system fundamentally. Other actions have included attempts to end birthright citizenship and reduce refugee admissions.

Legal experts have voiced significant constitutional concerns regarding the potential implications for the families of naturalized citizens. According to Cassandra Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, civil litigation for denaturalization raises issues of due process violations, as those involved are not entitled to government-provided legal representation, and the burden of proof is lower than in criminal cases.

Critics argue that this could lead to a “second class of U.S. citizens,” with those naturalized at greater risk of losing their citizenship. Sameera Hafiz from the Immigrant Legal Resource Center expressed shock at the administration’s expansion plans for denaturalization.

However, Hans von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation supports the measures, stating that the privilege of U.S. citizenship should be revoked from those who engage in serious criminal behavior.

The DOJ memo outlines expanded criteria for denaturalization, including national security violations and fraud crimes like those involving the Paycheck Protection Program or Medicare. Additionally, U.S. attorneys have been granted “wide discretion” in pursuing other cases deemed important by the Civil Division, leading to concerns about the government’s broad authority in these matters.

Steve Lubet, professor emeritus at Northwestern University, highlighted the vagueness of these categories and their potential overreach. He also raised concerns about the ripple effects on families, particularly children whose citizenship derives from a parent facing denaturalization.

The case of Elliott Duke illustrates the potential consequences for those caught in denaturalization proceedings. Duke, who was convicted of offenses before completing the naturalization process, is now effectively stateless and unable to challenge the legal decision without difficulty.

The push toward denaturalization parallels actions taken during the McCarthy era, characterized by intense scrutiny and removal of citizenship from thousands, until a 1967 Supreme Court ruling curtailed such practices. Recent technological advances under the Obama administration facilitated the identification of potential denaturalization cases, leading to an uptick in these actions during Trump’s first term.

Despite concerns about expanding the criteria for denaturalization, experts like Robertson question the scope of cases that actually warrant such action. She suggests that intensified enforcement might target individuals with minimal infractions, aligning with broader trends in immigration enforcement under the current administration.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Proposes Stricter Citizenship Test and H-1B Reforms

Staff ReporterImmigration, Cover, USA 0

The Trump administration is set to introduce significant immigration reforms, targeting the H-1B visa program and the U.S. citizenship test, with plans to make both processes more challenging.

The Trump administration is preparing to implement a new wave of immigration reforms aimed at changing the visa system for skilled foreign workers and revising the citizenship test. Joseph Edlow, the newly appointed Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), detailed these plans in an interview with The New York Times, describing the existing citizenship evaluation as “easy.”

“The test as it’s laid out right now, it’s not very difficult. It’s very easy to kind of memorize the answers. I don’t think we’re really comporting with the spirit of the law,” Edlow stated during the interview on Thursday.

The proposed changes arise amid a broader crackdown on immigration during Trump’s second term, which has seen tightened visa rules and reduced refugee programs, affecting both documented and undocumented immigrants. The administration intends to reintroduce a stricter version of the citizenship test first seen during Trump’s initial term in office. Under the new format, applicants must correctly answer 12 out of 20 civics questions compared to the current requirement of 6 out of 10, thereby ensuring a deeper understanding of U.S. civics and governance beyond rote memorization.

Another key proposal involves restructuring the H-1B visa program, which serves skilled foreign workers. Edlow indicated that the USCIS plans to prioritize companies offering higher wages over the current lottery-based system. This revision would address criticism that companies exploit the system by hiring cheaper foreign labor, thus undercutting American workers.

Vice President JD Vance echoed these concerns, criticizing companies that lay off domestic workers while continuing to hire foreign workers. However, Edlow maintains, “I really do think that the way H-1B needs to be used… is to, along with a lot of other parts of immigration, supplement, not supplant, U.S. economy and U.S. businesses and U.S. workers.”

Despite the administration’s push, not everyone agrees with the proposed direction. Doug Rand, a former Biden official, cautioned that favoring higher-salary positions might undermine the original purpose of the H-1B program. “Like it or not, the H-1B program is the main way that U.S. companies can hire the best and brightest international graduates of U.S. universities,” Rand remarked to The New York Times. “Congress never allowed DHS to put its thumb on the scale based on salary.”

Edlow, who was confirmed by the Senate in July 2025, is anticipated to play a pivotal role in shaping immigration policy. With extensive experience in immigration enforcement and policy, stemming from his previous tenure at USCIS and the Justice Department, Edlow emphasized that immigration should serve as a national asset. “I think it absolutely should be a net positive,” he commented. “And if we’re looking at the people that are coming over… to advance certain economic agendas and otherwise benefit the national interest, that’s absolutely what we need to be taking care of.”

Though detailed policy documents outlining these reforms have not yet been disclosed, the USCIS has signaled a broader return to the rigorous approach seen during Trump’s first term. That era witnessed tightened green card eligibility rules and alterations to the asylum system, many of which faced legal challenges.

According to The New York Times, the tangible impact of these proposed changes on businesses and immigrants remains closely watched as the policies unfold.

H-1B Visa at Risk Due to Job Promotion

Staff ReporterImmigration, U.S., Visa 0

An H-1B visa holder faces immigration hurdles after a job promotion led to unexpected complications in renewing their visa for international travel.

An H-1B worker who had achieved a promotion in the United States is now dealing with potential visa complications, stemming from a change in job position. Initially entering the U.S. on an H-1B visa as a Quality Engineer, the worker advanced to the role of Electrical Engineer following a departmental shift and a salary increase in September 2024.

The individual’s visa was stamped in December 2024 based on their original position, during which their legal advisors did not indicate any potential issues. However, with urgent family travel plans on the horizon, the worker now faces a pressing need to have their visa re-stamped this December. Human Resources has flagged new concerns related to the promotion, prompting the legal team to request updated job details to reassess the situation.

This unforeseen delay has left the employee understandably anxious about the possibility of facing questions or encountering delays at the consulate, all while time is dwindling. Compounding the issue is HR’s slow response rate, with communication delays extending beyond a week, further intensifying the worker’s fears of being unable to return to the U.S. due to an H-1B technicality.

The employee is now grappling with a decision: whether to press harder on HR and legal teams for swift action or to proceed for stamping with their initial job details—a move that could potentially lead to inquiries about their current salary and job responsibilities.

This situation highlights the complexities and potential challenges that even a positive career advancement can trigger in the realm of U.S. immigration processes for H-1B visa holders, demonstrating how nuanced changes can result in substantial bureaucratic hurdles.

According to M9 News, the unfolding scenario underscores the precarious balance H-1B visa holders must maintain between career progression and compliance with U.S. immigration laws.

Source: Original article

Immigration Alerts Green Card Holders With New Warning

Staff ReporterImmigration, U.S., Visa 0

S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued a stern reminder to green card holders to always carry their proof of immigration status to avoid potential legal repercussions.

Lawful permanent residents in the United States are being reminded by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to keep their alien registration documentation with them at all times. The advisory emphasizes that failure to produce such documentation when stopped by federal law enforcement could result in misdemeanor charges and fines, according to a recent message by CBP posted on a social media platform.

This reminder is particularly pertinent in light of former President Donald Trump’s directive aimed at removing millions of migrants living without legal status. The Trump administration has upheld the stance that individuals residing unlawfully in the U.S. are considered criminals. Additionally, there have been instances where individuals with legal residency status, including green card holders, have been detained during Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. Newsweek has documented numerous cases involving green card holders and applicants being caught in such raids.

The importance of carrying proper documentation is underscored by the Office of Homeland Security Statistics, which estimated that around 12.8 million lawful permanent residents were residing in the United States as of January 1, 2024. The legal requirement for noncitizens to carry registration documents is not new and originates from Section 264(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. This statute classifies the failure to carry these documents as a federal misdemeanor.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has noted that lawful permanent residents who disregard this legal requirement could risk losing their immigration status and face potential removal from the country. Those detained by federal law enforcement have the right to remain silent and request legal representation. While it is mandatory to carry proof of status, individuals are not obligated to answer questions without a lawyer present.

In recent developments, USCIS has introduced a new $1,050 fee for certain applications that were previously free when filed as part of a green card case being adjudicated by an immigration court. This fee applies to Form I-131, which is used to request travel documents like advance parole, and Form I-765, the application for employment authorization. The implementation of this fee poses an added financial burden on individuals navigating the immigration court system while seeking lawful permanent residency.

Customs and Border Protection has reiterated its guidance through social media, emphasizing, “Every alien, eighteen years of age and over, shall at all times carry with him and have in his personal possession any certificate of alien registration or alien registration receipt card issued to him. Failing to do so can lead to a misdemeanor and fines if you are stopped by federal law enforcement. If you are a non-citizen, please follow the laws of the United States of America.”

What to Do If Laid Off on H-1B or L-1 Visa

Staff ReporterImmigration, U.S., Visa 0

Losing a job in the United States can significantly impact foreign nationals on H-1B or L-1 work visas, as it may trigger a time-sensitive need to secure new employment or alter their immigration status.

Losing employment in the United States is difficult for anyone, but for foreign nationals on H-1B or L-1 visas, it presents unique challenges. Their legal status is directly tied to their jobs, meaning job loss can start a countdown to finding a new position or changing immigration status before they fall out of lawful presence. Legal experts stress the importance of swift and strategic action during this crucial period.

Under U.S. immigration regulations, H-1B and L-1 visa holders are typically provided a 60-day grace period following the termination of employment. This grace period begins the day after one’s last working day, not the final date of receiving payroll or severance benefits. During these 60 days, affected individuals have the opportunity to secure new employment, enabling a new employer to file a visa transfer petition, or they can request a change in immigration status. It is crucial to note, however, that remaining on paid leave or severance does not equate to maintaining a valid visa status, a misunderstanding that frequently surprises people.

Attorneys recommend taking definitive steps by no later than 45 days into the grace period. Transferring an H-1B to a new employer requires a certified Labor Condition Application (LCA) from the Department of Labor, and this process can take up to a week. Delaying the start of this process risks exceeding the grace period. If a new job offer is not secured by then, individuals are advised to apply for a temporary status, such as a B-2 visitor visa, to avoid falling out of status before the deadline.

In some instances, visa holders might be eligible for completely different visa categories. Individuals with substantial financial resources could consider the EB-5 investor visa, which allows applicants to gain permanent residency by investing at least $800,000 in a qualifying U.S. project. The program also facilitates concurrent adjustment of status, permitting the individual to live and work in the U.S. while their green card application is pending approval. Alternatively, enrolling in school and switching to an F-1 student visa could be an option, though this route carries inherent risks. Immigration attorneys caution against programs offering “Day One CPT,” which face increasing scrutiny and may affect future visa or green card eligibility. Only enrollment in reputable, accredited institutions is considered safe.

Another potential pathway is switching to dependent status. If an individual’s spouse maintains valid H-1B or L-1 status, an application for an H-4 or L-2 visa, respectively, may be possible. This change can provide more time in the United States to find employment or plan subsequent steps, although re-entering the workforce will likely necessitate a new petition and, at times, consular processing outside the U.S.

The situation presents additional challenges for L-1 visa holders. The L-1 visa is company- and position-specific, preventing workers from easily switching employers unless the new company is a qualifying affiliate that files a fresh petition. If no internal transfer is possible, individuals must either change to a different nonimmigrant status or leave the U.S. before the grace period concludes.

Those in the process of obtaining a green card through their employer, particularly those in the PERM labor certification phase, may also find their application jeopardized by a job loss. A new employer willing to restart the process is typically required for the green card application to proceed. Workers approaching the end of their sixth year in H-1B status and awaiting green card-related milestones should seek early legal intervention to explore alternative strategies.

While job loss can initially seem like a sudden dead end for foreign workers, immigration attorneys emphasize the existence of viable pathways forward if quick action is taken. Understanding the grace period, exploring alternative visa options, and consulting legal professionals can make a significant difference in retaining the opportunity to live and work in the United States.

The NPZ Law Group, which specializes in immigration and nationality law, advises foreign workers to seek legal counsel immediately after losing a job to plan tailored options effectively.

Source: Original article

Indian Tech Professionals in US: Wealthy But Facing Challenges

Staff ReporterImmigration, Youth 0

For many Indian tech professionals, the allure of working in the United States on an H1B visa often transforms into a journey fraught with loneliness, stress, and workplace challenges.

Securing an H1B visa and landing a job in the United States is perceived as a major achievement for Indian students, associated with success, a lucrative salary, and global recognition. However, beneath this facade of prosperity, many of these professionals encounter significant personal and professional hurdles.

Recently, a post on Reddit by an Indian tech worker gained widespread attention. Despite holding a prestigious master’s degree, maintaining a stable position, and earning a commendable salary, he expressed profound dissatisfaction with his life. “I live alone with my cat. I have no friends. No respect at work. I feel like I’m losing my mind,” he admitted, a sentiment that resonated with thousands of others.

The core of the problem lies in the nature of the H1B visa system. It inherently ties employees to a single employer, creating a precarious situation where changing jobs could mean jeopardizing their visa status. As a result, many endure unfavorable working conditions to avoid risking their stay in the U.S.

For students, these challenges begin even before their careers start. Upon completing their education in America, they face the daunting task of securing employment within a 60 to 90-day window to maintain their visa status, failing which they must return to their home country.

This pressure can lead some to disastrous outcomes, either returning home burdened with debt and disappointed aspirations or accepting underpaid or exploitative roles just to remain eligible within the visa framework. Meanwhile, families and friends back in India often only witness the financial success, oblivious to the emotional toll exacted by such circumstances.

Social media further compounds the problem, as it tends to portray only the glamorous aspects of life abroad—smiling photos and travel snapshots—while concealing the mental breakdowns and visits to therapy that some individuals face.

Nevertheless, a minority manage to find solace, whether through fortuitous job changes, supportive supervisors, or even relocating to other countries. Amidst these challenges, a pertinent question surfaces: Is the pursuit of the American dream truly worthwhile if it costs one’s peace of mind? Increasingly, a quiet acknowledgment of doubt has begun to emerge.

Transit CEO Resigns Due to Green Card Issue

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics 0

The CEO of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) has stepped down due to complications in obtaining a green card, despite his Canadian citizenship and long-term plans with the organization.

Collie Greenwood, who was serving as the CEO and general manager of MARTA, resigned after his Employment Authorization Document expired in June. This document had allowed him to work legally in the United States despite not yet having secured a green card.

Greenwood, a Canadian citizen, has navigated U.S. immigration challenges, which can delay green cards for months or even years. In Greenwood’s case, the process left him unable to continue in his position, prompting him to take early retirement as announced in a MARTA board release last Thursday.

Greenwood joined MARTA in 2019 as chief of bus operations and urban planning before ascending to CEO in January 2022. Over his 35-year career, he began as a bus driver and worked his way through the ranks, illustrating his deep commitment to public transportation.

Despite the expiration of his work permit on June 18, Greenwood remains legally in the United States as he awaits the delivery of his green card. MARTA’s board acknowledged this and expressed regret over the situation, as Greenwood could not attend their recent meeting due to his pending immigration status.

Jennifer Ide, MARTA Board Chair, expressed sadness over the circumstances, emphasizing the complex nature of immigration issues in the United States. She praised Greenwood’s decision, stating it was a personal choice for the welfare of his family.

Ide also highlighted Greenwood’s contributions, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic and the transition after losing a previous general manager. Under Greenwood’s guidance, MARTA has become well-prepared to support Atlanta in hosting significant international events, including the upcoming FIFA World Cup games in 2026.

In his statement during the MARTA press release, Greenwood expressed gratitude for his time at the organization. He underscored his and his wife’s decision to retire as an opportunity to focus on family and friends.

Atlanta City Council President Doug Shipman commented on social media about the transition, suggesting that MARTA’s new leadership search presents a chance for a significant operational and strategic refresh. He called on the board to actively involve key stakeholders in redefining MARTA’s priorities and scale of change needed.

In the interim, Rhonda Allen, MARTA’s chief customer experience officer, has been appointed as acting general manager and CEO, ensuring continuity as the board searches for Greenwood’s permanent replacement.

MARTA, which plays a critical role in Atlanta’s public transit infrastructure, faces challenges typical of large transit systems but remains crucial in connecting the city, especially as it gears up for future event hosting responsibilities.

USCIS Reaches Fiscal Year 2026 H-1B Cap

Ajay GhoshImmigration, Policy 0

07/18/2025

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has received enough petitions to reach the congressionally mandated 65,000 H-1B visa regular cap and the 20,000 H-1B visa U.S. advanced degree exemption, known as the master’s cap, for fiscal year 2026.

We will continue to accept and process petitions that are otherwise exempt from the cap. Petitions filed for current H-1B workers who have been counted previously against the cap, and who still retain their cap number, are exempt from the FY 2026 H-1B cap. We will continue to accept and process petitions filed to:

  • Extend the amount of time a current H-1B worker may remain in the United States;
  • Change the terms of employment for current H-1B workers;
  • Allow current H-1B workers to change employers; and
  • Allow current H-1B workers to work concurrently in additional H-1B positions.

U.S. businesses use the H-1B program to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations. We encourage H-1B petitioners to subscribe to receive H-1B cap season email updates by visiting the H-1B Cap Season page.

GOPIO Webinar on Immigration Upheavals and Indian Diaspora Challenges highlighted for advocacy and future impact

Ajay GhoshImmigration, Diaspora 0

(New York, NY: July 18, 2025) 

GOPIO’s inaugural Webinar receives wonderful response;

Immigration Upheavals and Indian Diaspora Challenges highlighted for advocacy and future impact

 The Global Organization of People of Indian Origin (GOPIO) inaugurated its new international webinar series on July 12, 2025, with a compelling session titled “Indian Diaspora and Immigration Upheavals – Path Forward.” The webinar started with a welcome by Webinar Series chair Sunil Vuppala, who is also GOPIO’s Associate Secretary.  Chief Guest was Lord Bhikhu Parekh, a member of the House of Lords in London. The event gathered leading immigration attorneys, policymakers, and community thought leaders to examine the shifting landscape of immigration policy across the US, Canada, and the UK.

Moderated by renowned thinker and researcher Dr. Maya Chadda, Professor Emeritus at William Paterson University and a permanent member of the Council of Foreign Relations, the webinar tackled pressing issues faced by Indian students and immigrants—ranging from visa backlogs and restrictive reforms to evolving international student work policies in the USA, Canada and UK.

GOPIO’s Founder and Chairman Dr. Thomas Abraham, framed the initiative with a clear message: “Our goal is to create a global platform that not only informs but equips the Indian diaspora to navigate complex immigration landscapes with clarity and purpose. Through these webinars, GOPIO remains a catalyst for connection, advocacy, and community resilience.”

GOPIO President Prakash Shah, emphasized the series’ vital role in responding to community needs and said, “This series is more than information—it’s a lifeline. We are committed to amplifying the concerns of our communities across borders and shaping a proactive response to immigration challenges with expert insights and collaborative solutions. In addition, we want to galvanize the Indian Diaspora for a greater contribution to reshape the future of global migration.”

Featured Experts and Insights

Lord Bhikhu C. Parekh – Member of the House of Lords of the United Kingdom, is a renowned political philosopher and speaker emeritus. He opened the webinar with remarks reflecting on the diaspora’s historical resilience despite the many challenges faced in the early years and more recent times.  Lord Parekh added “Migration out of India had been quite common, in pre-Aristotelian times in 3th and 4th Century BC, people usually moved from Gujarat to various parts of Greece, Rome and South-East Asia. Then it remained static and picked up again, when slavery was abolished and it was replaced by indentured labourers scattered across 42 countries.”

David Nachman, Esq. – New Jersey-based immigration attorney and founder of NPZ Law Group, highlighted “Enforcement priorities under the proposed Big Beautiful Bill and shared the immigration matters under various categories to be considered by the present and future diaspora members planning an immigration to US not only from India but also from Australia, UK, Europe to rejoin their extended family.”

Stephanie Dy, Esq. – Chicago based Parikh Law Group Immigration attorney specializing in high- skilled visas, explained stricter H-1B and L-1 vetting protocols. “She covered the effect of the Trump Administration’s immigration policies on the visa categories used by the Diaspora, specifically the Student and Employment visas and highlighted that any change in immigration policy is seismic and significant and impacts the diaspora especially as during 2024 the US India Mission broke records for 2nd year in a row with record over 1 million non-immigrant visas issued.”

Shaima Ammal, London based Solicitor and Advocate. “She shared post-pandemic reforms reducing low-skilled migration from India and recent changes in the policies has led to primary focus on border security and stopping illegal immigration with focus shifting towards allowing those that can contribute to the economy with English language are encouraged and how this will be implemented is to be seen.”

Dr. Sudhir Shah, Mumbai based Immigration Specialist – Provided insights into EB-5, L-1, and family-based visa options for Indian nationals. “He focused on the current visa requirements and encouraged those applying for visas, do it with honesty and preparing yourself for the visa application then you will be definitely granted the visa.”

Gaganjot Kaur – Toronto based Immigration expert, discussed ripple effects of U.S. border security measures on Canadian student policy. “She shared the policies has led to focus on international students that includes additional vetting, financial stability, education field as areas being considered along with a cap of 5% being introduced.  She added that the investor visa option is still open in Canada.” 

GOPIO Immigration Issues Webinar Organizers, Chief Guest, Moderator and Panellists: First Row: Prakash Shah, Dr. Thomas Abraham, Gaganjot Mundra; Second Row: Prof. Maya Chadda, Dr. Sudhir Shah, David Nachman; Thord Row: Lord Bhikhu Parekh, Sid Jain, Shaima Ammal; Fourth Row: Stephanie Dy, Raj Punjabi and Kumu Gupta

The session started with a tribute to Michael Phulwani, a renowned Indian American immigration attorney & immigration pioneer, with touching remarks from President Shah and Attorney David Nachman recounting shared legal journeys and cultural insights from India.

Key Action Items and Initiatives

  • Encourage HR teams to implement visa tracking systems and sponsor risk policies
  • Request Immigration lawyers provide timely guidance on new regulations and higher denial trends
  • Counsel International students to comply with work hour limits and timely OPT applications
  • GOPIO to host monthly webinar series covering technology, youth leadership, and healthcare investment
  • Next webinar on AI and Technology set for August 9, 2025
  • Plans launched for international symposium on AI, quantum computing, and tech innovations in early 2026
  • Efforts underway to establish GOPIO chapters in Boston, Nashville, South Jersey and Pune through local WhatsApp network. Those interested to join may contact Sid Jain at +1 201 889 8888 or email at siddharth@aaaumom.com.
  • Advocacy for India-USA bilateral facilitation to ease and enable investment-based visasGOPIO General Secretary Sid Jain gave the concluding remarks and vote of thanks to all in attendance. The event concluded with calls for collaboration, education, and ongoing dialogue among Diaspora communities.**GOPIO logo is a trademark registered under the US and India Patent and Trademark Office.

    For more info on GOPIO International Monthly Programs, contact Sunil Vuppula +1 (732) 331-3084 or Rohit Vyas GOPIO Global Media Council Chair at 732-319-0972 or send an email to gopio@optonline.net.

     

Trump Administration Evaluates New H-1B Visa Issuance Method

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics, Visa 0

The Trump administration is exploring a potential overhaul of the H-1B visa lottery system by introducing a weighted selection process.

The Trump administration has revealed plans to potentially change the way H-1B visas are administered, particularly by introducing a “weighted selection process.” In a recent submission to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) indicated it is considering alterations for the capped part of the H-1B system.

The H-1B visa program, which grants 85,000 visas annually, has become a battleground for supporters and opponents. President Donald Trump’s supporters are advocating for more stringent immigration controls, while prominent figures like Elon Musk, along with the president, continue to back the initiative. This visa is a critical pathway for tech companies to hire highly skilled foreign professionals, a point of contention for those who believe it displaces American workers.

Details regarding the potential weighted selection process remain sparse, according to the DHS filing. Nonetheless, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has been mentioned as a responsible entity for implementing these potential changes. Traditionally, H-1B visas are distributed through a lottery system, which aims to provide an equal chance for all applicants. Yet, large corporations such as Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are able to submit more applications, disproportionately securing more visas.

Earlier this year, the Institute for Progress, an independent think tank focusing on innovation policy, proposed removing the lottery system. They reasoned that assessing applications based on criteria like seniority or salary could enhance the program’s economic value significantly. Doing so would, according to the think tank, allocate visas to the most qualified temporary immigrants.

Connor O’Brien, an Economic Innovation Group researcher, expressed support for rethinking the H-1B allocation system by emphasizing, “The details of the rule and how it is implemented will matter a lot. But eliminating the H-1B lottery in favor of a system that prioritizes higher earners first is a no-brainer.”

As of now, no specific timeline has been announced for these changes. It’s also unlikely that next year’s H-1B applicants will be affected, given that the current year’s quota is already filled.

Source: Original article

Countries That Prohibit Dual Citizenship Revealed in New Map

Staff ReporterImmigration, Global 0

Data mapped by Newsweek reveals that at least 39 countries around the world do not allow dual citizenship, highlighting diverse global perspectives on nationality and identity.

A recent survey by the Harris Poll found that 42 percent of U.S. adults have considered or plan to move abroad to improve their lifestyle or financial situation. The percentage increases among younger generations, with 63 percent of Gen Z and 52 percent of millennials expressing similar sentiments.

According to Henley & Partners, a U.K.-based investment migration consultancy, many countries restrict dual citizenship to preserve national identity, ensure loyalty, and avoid complex legal scenarios. The consultancy identified several nations that do not permit individuals to hold more than one nationality.

In Africa, countries like Botswana, Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Eswatini, Guinea, Libya, Mauritania, Senegal, Tanzania, and the Republic of Congo prohibit dual citizenship. Meanwhile, in the Americas, Cuba and Suriname uphold similar rules. European countries with this restriction include Andorra, Estonia, Monaco, and San Marino.

Asian nations with bans on dual citizenship encompass a wide range, from Azerbaijan, Bhutan, and Brunei to China, India, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, North Korea, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and Uzbekistan. Each country has specific reasons for maintaining these restrictions, often revolving around issues like divided allegiance and potential security threats, such as military conflicts or espionage. Legal complexities related to taxation and rights, along with fears that dual nationality might undermine cultural or political cohesion, also play a role in these decisions.

For example, China completely bans dual citizenship, emphasizing the need for loyalty to safeguard national unity. India also prohibits dual nationality to maintain legal and administrative clarity but provides an alternative through the Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) status. This status offers limited rights without granting full citizenship. Singapore enforces a strict one-citizenship policy, underlining national allegiance and requiring proof of renunciation of other citizenships before granting naturalization.

Tim Osiecki, the director of thought leadership and trends at The Harris Poll, noted a shift in the American Dream. “For most of modern history, the American Dream was rooted in one place: America. But that’s shifting,” he previously told Newsweek. According to Osiecki, dual citizenship is increasingly becoming a goal for middle-class Americans who seek greater control over their future in an uncertain world, marking a mindset shift from a singular national allegiance to adaptability.

Osiecki also pointed out that while the intent to move abroad among younger Americans is significant, it is not indicative of a mass migration. “This isn’t about a mass migration overnight, but we are at a tipping point,” he said. “One in five younger Americans say they’re seriously considering moving abroad, and that kind of intent matters.” He emphasizes that although it is not yet an exodus, it signals a changing perception of life in the United States.

The notion of the American Dream might not be fading; it could simply be evolving to accommodate the growing desire for mobility and flexibility in an increasingly interconnected world.

Trump Administration Shares Medicaid Data with ICE

Staff ReporterCrime, Immigration 0

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials are now authorized to access the personal data of 79 million Medicaid enrollees to locate individuals living illegally in the United States, as per a recently signed agreement between the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

In a bold move by the Trump administration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials will gain access to extensive personal data from the nation’s Medicaid program to identify immigrants residing illegally within the U.S. This agreement, unveiled by The Associated Press, is part of an ongoing crackdown on illegal immigration.

The agreement, signed Monday, outlines that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will utilize Medicaid enrollee data to trace the locations of undocumented immigrants. This unprecedented sharing of personal health data with deportation authorities marks a significant escalation in the Trump administration’s efforts to bolster immigration enforcement.

While the agreement was not publicly announced, it has sparked considerable debate regarding the legality and ethics of such data sharing. Some lawmakers and officials within the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have expressed concerns, highlighting potential violations of privacy.

The shared information will include names, home addresses, birth dates, racial and ethnic data, and Social Security numbers, which ICE will access through a controlled database from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday to Friday, until September 9. ICE officials are prohibited from downloading the data but are afforded access for a limited period.

Tricia McLaughlin, the assistant secretary at the DHS, stated in an email that the initiative aims to ensure Medicaid benefits are not wrongfully extended to undocumented aliens. However, specific details on whether the DHS has accessed this data remain unclear.

The sensitive nature of the data sharing has been met with resistance and skepticism, especially since federal law mandates that all states provide emergency Medicaid services for life-saving situations, regardless of the patient’s citizenship status. The potential ramifications could deter individuals from seeking necessary medical attention, fearing repercussions from ICE.

Hannah Katch, who served as a CMS adviser during the Biden administration, criticized the agreement, emphasizing that CMS historically did not share personally identifiable information outside the agency except for investigations related to waste, fraud, or abuse.

Last month, the Trump administration pursued access to detailed Medicaid enrollee data from seven states where lawfully present but non-citizen immigrants could enroll in full Medicaid programs. Those states, namely California, New York, Washington, Oregon, Illinois, Minnesota, and Colorado, all led by Democratic governors, have resisted this federal push. These states committed not to charge the federal government for coverage related to these immigrants, and have expressed concerns over privacy violations.

This controversy has led to lawsuits from 20 states alleging breaches of health privacy laws, challenging the CMS’s decision to comply with DHS data access requests. Internal communications at CMS reveal hesitation regarding the data exchange amid ongoing litigation, with discussions about seeking a delay from the White House.

Political opposition has been vocal. Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff and other members of Congress have directly addressed DHS and HHS officials, asserting that the data transfer constitutes a substantial infringement on privacy rights and could dissuade citizens from seeking essential healthcare services.

Despite criticisms, HHS officials maintain that their actions are lawful and comply with regulations, emphasizing that the initiative seeks to ensure that Medicaid benefits are properly allocated. Spokesman Andrew Nixon reiterated this position while responding to the ongoing legal challenges.

Source: Original article

3,000 Indian Professionals Eligible for UK Visa in July Ballot

Staff ReporterImmigration, Youth 0

Under the UK-India Young Professionals Scheme, 3,000 working professionals from India aged 18 to 30 will have the opportunity to live and work in the UK for up to two years.

The UK-India Young Professionals Scheme, launched in February 2023, provides Indian citizens aged 18 to 30 with the opportunity to reside and work in the United Kingdom for a duration of two years. To be eligible for this visa, applicants must possess an eligible qualification and hold at least £2,530 in savings.

The selection process begins with a ballot, which will open for 48 hours starting at 1:30 p.m. on July 22 and closing at 1:30 p.m. on July 24. There is no cost to enter the ballot, but once selected, applicants must pay a £319 fee while applying for the visa.

Entering the ballot requires potential applicants to provide their name, date of birth, passport details, a scan or photo of their passport, phone number, and email address.

Once selected in the ballot, applicants must submit a valid passport or other proof of identity and nationality, evidence of holding at least £2,530 in their bank account via bank statements, qualifications documentation, and present tuberculosis (TB) test results if residing in India. Additionally, a police report or clearance certificate from India is required.

A total of 3,000 visas are available for 2025 within this scheme. Most of these positions were offered in February, with the remaining slots to be distributed in July when the final ballot is conducted.

Those successful in the ballot will be contacted via email and will then have 90 days to complete the visa application process online. This process includes paying a visa application fee and the immigration health surcharge (IHS), as well as providing biometric information, such as fingerprints and a photo.

If individuals are selected in the ballot but decide against applying for the visa, they are under no obligation to proceed.

For more detailed guidance on the UK-India Young Professionals Scheme and the ballot system, interested individuals can visit the official UK government website.

According to World Malayalee Voice, the UK is committed to strengthening bilateral relations with India through this unique opportunity for young professionals.

Rakesh Gangwal Named on Forbes’ 2025 Richest Immigrants List

Staff ReporterBusiness, Immigration 0

Rakesh Gangwal, co-founder of IndiGo Airlines and Chairman of Southwest Airlines’ board, has secured the 29th position on Forbes’ 2025 list of America’s richest immigrants, with a net worth of $6.6 billion.

Forbes recently published its 2025 rankings of the richest Americans, highlighting a notable presence of immigrant billionaires among the country’s elite. While Elon Musk from South Africa, Sergey Brin from Russia, and Jensen Huang from Taiwan topped the list with net worths of $393.1 billion, $139.7 billion, and $137.9 billion respectively, the list also features Rakesh Gangwal at the 29th spot.

Gangwal, a prominent figure in the aviation industry, co-founded IndiGo Airlines, India’s largest airline by market share. He also serves as the Chairman of the board of directors for Southwest Airlines. His financial holdings are primarily tied to his 14 percent stake in InterGlobe Aviation, the parent company of IndiGo, based in Gurgaon, India. According to the Bloomberg Billionaire Index, his estimated net worth is around $7.83 billion, attributed largely to his interests in the aviation sector.

Born in 1953 in Kolkata, India, Gangwal obtained a bachelor’s degree in engineering from the India Institute of Technology Kanpur in 1975 and later pursued an MBA from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. His career began at Ford Motor Co. as a financial analyst, followed by a role as a production and planning engineer with Philips India.

Gangwal’s journey in the airline industry began in 1980 when he joined United Airlines. By 1984, he advanced to the position of manager for strategic planning. He furthered his career as an executive vice president for Air France in 1994 and later served as CEO of US Airways from 1998 until his resignation in 2001. In 2006, he co-founded IndiGo, which was publicly listed in 2015.

The Forbes list underscores the contributions and success of immigrant billionaires in the United States. India’s prominence is significant, topping the list with 12 immigrant billionaires, an increase from seven in 2022. It is followed by Israel and Taiwan, which each boast 11 immigrant billionaires. Canada and China have also shown increased numbers, contributing nine and eight billionaires, respectively, this year.

Germany and Iran each account for six US-based billionaire immigrants, while France, Hungary, and Ukraine follow with five and four, respectively. This year, a record 125 foreign-born individuals were named as billionaires in the United States, up from 92 in 2022.

The collective wealth of these immigrant billionaires stands at an impressive $1.3 trillion, which represents 18 percent of America’s total billionaire wealth of $7.2 trillion. A notable 93 percent of these individuals are self-made, with nearly 70 percent earning their fortunes in the technology and finance industries.

According to Source Name, this year’s list exemplifies the remarkable achievements and significant economic contributions of immigrants in the United States.

Green Card News Issued by U.S. Immigration Officials

Staff ReporterImmigration, U.S., Visa 0

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has published its August 2025 visa bulletin, detailing significant updates on the processing dates for various immigrant visa categories.

The monthly release of the visa bulletin serves as a crucial resource for individuals and families aiming for permanent residency in the United States, guiding them through what is often a challenging and prolonged process.

For applicants seeking green cards, keeping abreast of the visa bulletin is essential. It helps determine the timeline for adjusting their immigration status by providing updates on when they become eligible, which primarily depends on the date a sponsorship petition was filed by either an employer or family member. This establishes the priority date, distinct from the date of filing for permanent residence, which the bulletin governs to indicate when immigrants can move forward with their applications.

The USCIS’s latest bulletin arrives at a time when the agency is grappling with a significant backlog of approximately 11.3 million pending applications. The new updates in the bulletin are vital for applicants who need clarity on when they can proceed with their green card applications.

The State Department’s issuance of the bulletin includes updated priority dates that provide a framework for when applicants can either file their visa applications or adjust their immigration status. For the fiscal year 2025, family-sponsored immigrants face a limit of 226,000 visas, as outlined in Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Meanwhile, employment-based preference immigrants have a global cap of at least 140,000 visas annually.

Further, per the INA’s Section 202, country-specific limits are enforced for preference immigrants, capping each nation’s share at 7 percent of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based visa numbers combined—amounting to about 25,620 visas per country. Dependent territories have a separate limit of 2 percent or 7,320 visas.

These statutory constraints heavily influence visa availability and wait times, especially for countries with high demand such as India and China. The bulletin’s findings illustrate how important these priority dates are for Indian nationals, who often face extended wait times due to these limits and the existing backlog.

While some family-based visa categories have seen minimal progress with queues advancing by a month, the employment-based visa categories largely remain stagnant. Notably, Indian applicants in high-demand professional fields are particularly affected by these persistent backlogs.

In a modest development, the August bulletin indicates that the employment-based second preference EB-2 visa for Indian nationals has advanced by around one month, a slight but meaningful improvement for many applicants waiting in line. Conversely, other significant employment-based categories, like EB-3 for India, remain static, further highlighting the ongoing challenges faced by Indian professionals striving for green cards.

EB-2 and EB-3 are critical categories for employment-based green cards that allow foreign nationals to secure permanent residency in the United States through their professional work. EB-2 is intended for those with advanced degrees or exceptional ability in fields like science, arts, or business. EB-3 caters to skilled workers with at least two years of experience, professionals with a bachelor’s degree, and individuals in unskilled positions requiring less than two years of training. Despite differences in eligibility and processing times, both categories offer pathways to a green card.

The bulletin similarly outlines a stagnant situation for Chinese applicants in employment-based categories. For family-based immigration, however, some categories continue with gradual progress, offering slight relief to families prolonged by extensive visa wait times.

Applicants must consider the “dates for filing” section in the bulletin, which indicates the earliest time they can submit applications for status adjustment or an immigrant visa, based on their visa category and country of origin. The “final action dates” signal when a visa number becomes available, permitting an application to be approved, thereby leading to permanent residency.

To apply in August 2025, applicants need a priority date that precedes the date listed for their respective visa category and country of chargeability in the bulletin, confirming their eligibility to proceed. The final action dates are crucial to processing green card applications as they dictate when a case can be approved, affecting the wait time for obtaining a green card.

Doug Rand, a former senior official at USCIS during the Biden administration, commented on the situation: “There are two very different backlogs at play. USCIS and the State Department have administrative backlogs, which are cases ready to process as soon as possible. But the visa bulletin reflects a statutory backlog—Congress imposed annual limits on green cards back in 1990, and this has created huge bottlenecks that the executive branch can’t fix on its own,” according to Newsweek.

U.S. Introduces Visa Integrity Fee for Non-Immigrants

Staff ReporterImmigration, U.S., Visa 0

The newly enacted “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” introduces a $250 “visa integrity fee” for most non-immigrant U.S. visas, significantly increasing costs for applicants.

The U.S. has established a $250 “visa integrity fee” for non-immigrant visa applicants as part of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” otherwise known as H.R.-1. This fee will come into effect in fiscal 2026 and applies to most categories of non-immigrant visas, including B-1/B-2 for tourism and business, F and M for students, H-1B for workers, and J for exchange visitors.

According to Fragomen, a U.S.-based immigration firm, President Donald Trump signed H.R.-1 into law on July 4. The legislation also involves additional non-waivable travel surcharges, such as a $24 I-94 fee, a $13 Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) fee for Visa Waiver Program travelers, and a $30 Electronic Visa Update System (EVUS) fee for certain Chinese nationals with 10-year B-1/B-2 visas.

These changes mean that a B-1/B-2 visa for Indian nationals, currently costing about $185, could see its cost rise to approximately $472 when factoring in the $250 integrity fee, $24 I-94 fee, and $13 ESTA fee. The total cost of a B-1/B-2 visa for Indian nationals may increase to nearly two-and-a-half times the current amount due to the new surcharges.

The law allows for future fee increases through regulation, which advocates claim will enhance compliance and reduce visa overstays. The initial $250 fee set for fiscal 2025 could be higher if adjusted by the Department of Homeland Security. From 2026 onward, the fee will be indexed to inflation, rising annually according to changes in the Consumer Price Index.

Additional fee increases include a $1,000 charge for asylum applications and parolees, a $500 fee for Temporary Protected Status, a $100 annual charge for asylum seekers with pending cases, and a $1,500 fee for adjusting to lawful permanent resident status.

Diplomatic applicants categorized under A and G are exempt from this fee. The legislation stipulates in 14 instances that the fee “shall not be waived or reduced.”

The possibility of a refund exists for applicants who comply with visa conditions, though it requires submitting documentation such as timely departure records or proof of status adjustment. Refunds will not happen automatically; the Secretary of Homeland Security may provide reimbursement after the visa’s validity period expires if compliance can be demonstrated. Otherwise, the fee is to be transferred to the U.S. Treasury’s general fund.

Additionally, the U.S. is considering a significant change to its visa policy by imposing fixed stays for F, J, and I visa holders, a move that could impact over 420,000 Indian students. In June, the U.S. Embassy in India mandated that Indian applicants for F, M, or J student visas must set their social media accounts to ‘public’ before their visa interviews.

These developments underscore the evolving landscape for non-immigrant visas in the U.S., driven by efforts to ensure integrity and compliance, though they present potential financial and procedural hurdles for applicants worldwide.

Source: Original article

Indian-Americans Abandon Green Cards Within Six Years: US Report

Staff ReporterImmigration, India 0

Indians are expeditiously transitioning from green card holders to U.S. citizens, completing the process in just under six years on average.

Recent data from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) indicates that Indian nationals are rapidly advancing through the naturalization process, becoming U.S. citizens in an average of 5.9 years, significantly quicker than peers from other countries. This figure sits comfortably below the national average of 7.5 years for obtaining U.S. citizenship after acquiring a green card.

In comparison, Mexican nationals, who represent the largest group in terms of overall naturalizations, face a wait period of nearly 11 years. While they lead in sheer numbers, Indians are swiftly progressing through the citizenship process. The USCIS stipulates that to become a U.S. citizen, an individual must have been a permanent resident for at least five years, or three years in cases where the residency is marriage-based.

The path to citizenship is relatively direct for many non-resident Indians (NRIs). After five years of permanent residency, candidates are eligible to take the English and civics test required for naturalization. The success rate for first-time test-takers is notably high, with nearly 90 percent passing on their initial attempt.

Interestingly, this trend is not limited to any particular demographic within the Indian community in the United States. The median age for NRIs obtaining citizenship is 42, and women constitute about 55 percent of the applicants. While the stereotype of tech workers dominates the narrative, this data suggests a broader cross-section of the Indian diaspora is pursuing citizenship.

The drive towards acquiring U.S. citizenship is spurred by several factors, including visa uncertainties and the complexities surrounding H-1B visas, which have been exacerbated by political climates, particularly under the Trump administration. For many, U.S. citizenship represents more than just legal security; it offers the freedom to change jobs without visa constraints and removes the looming threat of deportation.

Ultimately, for Indians, the American dream transcends the attainment of a green card. With the assurance that only an American passport can provide, citizenship is seen as the ultimate goal, offering unparalleled safety and stability.

Top American Immigrant Billionaires in 2025

Staff ReporterImmigration, Finance/Economy 0

America’s wealthiest immigrants, a group now numbering 125 individuals hailing from 41 countries, collectively hold $1.3 trillion in assets, reflecting their significant impact and presence in the nation’s economic landscape.

Emerging from humble beginnings, billionaires like Steven Udvar-Hazy exemplify the transformative journey many immigrants undertake when they move to America. Having arrived from Hungary as a child, Udvar-Hazy began his life in the U.S. packing boxes in a Manhattan warehouse for 30 cents an hour at age 14. Today, he stands as a pioneer in the airplane leasing industry, illustrating the stark contrast between his early life experiences and his present achievements.

Udvar-Hazy speaks to the unique mindset immigrants possess, having left behind totalitarian or hardship conditions in their home countries. “When you get out of that situation and come to America, you have a completely different value system,” he explains, highlighting the stark differences in motivation and appreciation compared to those born and raised in the U.S.

This perspective isn’t limited to Udvar-Hazy. Immigrants comprise a record 14% of America’s nearly 900 billionaires, according to Forbes’ latest list. These 125 foreign-born citizens collectively represent 18% of the $7.2 trillion in total billionaire wealth in the United States.

Remarkably, three out of the top ten richest people in America are immigrants. Elon Musk tops the list as both America’s and the world’s wealthiest individual, with an estimated net worth of $393.1 billion. Born in South Africa, Musk’s journey brought him to the U.S. via Canada as a college student. Google cofounder Sergey Brin follows as the second richest immigrant, worth approximately $139.7 billion. His family’s immigration from Russia to escape anti-Semitism played a crucial role in his path to success.

Jensen Huang, cofounder and CEO of Nvidia, stands as America’s third richest immigrant, with a net worth of $137.9 billion. Born in Taiwan and later relocated to Thailand, Huang was sent to the U.S. at age nine to flee social unrest. His story is among many from Taiwan, which ties with Israel for the second most billionaire immigrants in the U.S., witnessing an increase from 4 to 11 Taiwanese billionaires since 2022. Notably, Huang’s cousin, Lisa Su, CEO of AMD, has also entered the billionaire ranks, one of 17 female billionaire immigrants, compared to 10 two years ago.

The latest list also showcases new faces like Maky Zanganeh, who hails from Iran. As co-CEO of Summit Therapeutics, Zanganeh was propelled into the billionaire classification after the company’s stock skyrocketed by nearly 200%, driven by a promising lung cancer drug candidate. She emphasizes the adaptive mindset necessary for immigrants, stating, “In business, you must stay sharp, evolve constantly, and be resilient.”

India has made a significant contribution, displacing Israel as the birth country of the most billionaire immigrants in the U.S., with a total of 12 individuals. Recent additions from India include Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet; Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft; and Nikesh Arora, CEO of Palo Alto Networks.

These stories highlight not only the diverse origins of America’s wealthiest but also underscore the entrepreneurial spirit and determination that define many immigrants’ successes.

Indian H-1B Worker Cautions on US Property Purchase Risks

Staff ReporterImmigration, Finance/Economy 0

With interest rates on the rise, job insecurity, and changing immigration policies, an H-1B visa holder in the U.S. has ignited a debate, urging fellow Indians to reconsider buying a house.

An H-1B visa holder in the United States has sparked significant discussion on Reddit, cautioning others against purchasing property under the current economic conditions. The user’s post, shared on the subreddit r/h1b, carries the straightforward headline: “Please don’t buy a house in this environment. Just my advice of course.”

The Reddit user argues that, given the present market conditions, renting often appears to be a more financially prudent choice. This viewpoint is grounded in several factors currently affecting potential homebuyers, particularly those on visas, who might face additional challenges and uncertainty.

Rising interest rates are a primary concern, with potential homeowners facing higher mortgage costs that could stretch finances too thin. The user also points out job insecurity as another critical factor. Many individuals on visas are employed in sectors that could be vulnerable to economic shifts, which might jeopardize their financial stability and, in turn, their ability to maintain mortgage payments.

Adding to the financial considerations are the complexities of immigration policies, which continue to evolve. These policies can have far-reaching implications for those on work visas, further complicating decisions about long-term investments like homeownership.

The Reddit post outlines how, under these conditions, the traditional wisdom of purchasing a home as a secure investment might not hold true for everyone. Instead, renting provides more flexibility, enabling individuals to adapt more quickly to changing personal and financial circumstances.

This discussion comes at a time when potential homebuyers, particularly those on work visas, need to navigate a complex landscape of economic and policy-related challenges. By sharing their perspective, the user has encouraged others to carefully assess their situations and consider whether entering the real estate market is the right decision at this time.

Original insights like those shared on Reddit provide a valuable perspective for many, especially those facing similar situations, underlining the importance of community discussions in navigating today’s uncertain economic environment, according to Business Today.

Supreme Court to Decide on Birthright Citizenship Issue

Staff ReporterImmigration, Nation 0

The legal battle over President Donald Trump’s executive order aiming to restrict birthright citizenship could soon return to the U.S. Supreme Court after a federal judge blocked the order’s implementation nationwide.

A judge in New Hampshire on Thursday issued a preliminary injunction against President Donald Trump’s executive order that sought to end birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to parents without legal status. This decision halts the enforcement of the order across the country.

Judge Joseph LaPlante, appointed by former President George W. Bush, granted a preliminary injunction and certified a class-action lawsuit regarding all children potentially impacted by the order. This ruling arrives shortly after the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA, which limited judges’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions but did not resolve the constitutionality of Trump’s order itself.

The concept of birthright citizenship is rooted in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which grants American citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, including children born to undocumented immigrants.

In his order, Judge LaPlante expressed little hesitation in determining that an injunction was necessary. “Respondents’ arguments about irreparable harm remain unconvincing to the court,” LaPlante wrote, highlighting the constitutional concerns surrounding the rapid implementation of such a policy. He stated that acting without legislation and national debate could cause irreparable harm to thousands who would otherwise be entitled to citizenship.

Renowned immigration law expert Stephen Yale-Loehr told Newsweek that while the injunction is a critical step, it is a preliminary finding that allows the case to proceed as a class action. He noted that it does not resolve the essential questions concerning the executive order itself, emphasizing that a final decision might not reach the Supreme Court until next year.

In a statement made on the Bloomberg Law podcast, Jonathan Adler, a constitutional law professor at William & Mary Law School, speculated that the Trump administration will likely challenge the class certification of the case. He suggested that the matter may end up before the Supreme Court, anticipating that five justices might be ready to rule on the order’s merits.

Cody Wofsy, the deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrant’s Rights Project, described the ruling as a significant victory, asserting that it upholds the intended constitutional protection of citizenship for all children born in the U.S. He underscored the importance of preserving these citizenship rights against presidential overreach.

Conversely, White House spokesman Harrison Fields affirmed that the Trump administration plans to actively contest what he called the obstructive actions of district court judges undermining policy objectives set by President Trump.

Judge LaPlante’s decision includes a seven-day stay, allowing the government time to appeal the ruling. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court concluded its opinions for the 2024-25 term in late June, and the upcoming term will commence in October, with emergency order applications being considered at any point.

According to Newsweek, the legal trajectory related to this executive order remains unsettled as the battle over birthright citizenship persists.

US Imposes $250 Visa Fee for Tourists, Students from 2026

Staff ReporterImmigration, Visa 0

Indian nationals traveling to the United States will face a significant increase in visa-related costs starting in 2026, as part of a broad immigration overhaul under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Indian nationals traveling to the United States for tourism, education, or temporary work will soon face a significant increase in visa-related costs.

Beginning in 2026, a new $250 “Visa Integrity Fee” will be levied on most non-immigrant visa categories under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1), which was signed into law by U.S. President Donald Trump on July 4.

The surcharge will apply to B-1/B-2 tourist and business visas, F and M student visas, H-1B work visas, and J-1 exchange visas, among others. Only diplomatic visa classes (A and G) are exempt.

The fee will be collected by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) at the time of visa issuance and is framed as a refundable security deposit. To be eligible for a refund, travelers must comply with all visa conditions—such as departing the U.S. within five days of expiration or adjusting their immigration status legally—and submit the required documentation.

The $250 charge is in addition to existing costs. The current $185 Machine-Readable Visa (MRV) application fee remains unchanged, but applicants will also be required to pay a $24 I-94 surcharge for entry/exit tracking.

Those using the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) or Electronic Visa Update System (EVUS) will incur additional fees of $13 and $30, respectively. For Indian travelers, the total cost of obtaining a U.S. visa could rise to approximately $480, effectively doubling current expenses.

The new surcharge is part of a broader immigration overhaul under the One Big Beautiful Bill, which allocates $150 billion through 2029 for expanded immigration enforcement.

The legislation increases funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), expands detention infrastructure, accelerates deportations, and limits asylum access. These measures will be partially funded through higher visa fees and a new 1 percent tax on foreign remittances, according to the Immigration Advocacy Project.

While the DHS maintains that the Visa Integrity Fee will promote compliance and deter overstays, critics argue that the fee disproportionately burdens applicants from countries like India, which sees high demand for U.S. visas. Education providers, technology employers, and travel industry representatives have warned that the increased financial burden may discourage students and skilled workers from choosing the U.S.

Estimates suggest that the new visa and related fees could generate $64 billion through 2034, contributing to federal tax and enforcement funding—but at a substantial cost to immigrant communities.

Source: Original article

India Sees 27% Decline in US Student Visas Since COVID

Staff ReporterImmigration, Visa 0

The issuance of student visas to Indian nationals for studying in the United States experienced a notable 27 percent decline between March and May this year, representing the slowest start to the visa season since the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The latest statistics from the U.S. State Department reveal that 9,906 F-1 visas were issued to Indian students during the referenced period. This marks a significant decrease from the 13,478 visas granted in the same months the previous year, and an even lower figure than the 10,894 visas issued in 2022, when international travel had only recently resumed.

The months from March to May typically witness a surge in visa processing as students gear up for the Fall semester, which generally commences in August or September. However, this year’s downturn coincides with a renewed immigration crackdown under the Trump administration, characterized by the introduction of more rigorous screening procedures for international students.

In late May, the U.S. State Department issued a directive halting new interview scheduling for F, M, and J visa applicants. This suspension of appointments, which lasted from May 27 to June 18, was a global measure as embassies were instructed to adhere to the newly implemented protocols.

The directive, endorsed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, sought to enforce mandatory social media scrutiny. Visa applicants were required to disclose their social media profiles from the preceding five years, a mandate that has stirred concerns among prospective students about processing delays and potential backlogs.

The U.S. Embassy in New Delhi issued public advisories urging Indian visa applicants to comply with these new conditions. Meanwhile, the policy adjustments have led to visa cancellations across at least 32 states in the U.S. Reports indicate that some of these cancellations involved Indian students and were associated with involvement in pro-Palestinian protests or previous legal infractions, such as DUIs, although in several cases, the reasons for cancellation were not explicitly communicated.

In response to the augmented scrutiny, many students have taken proactive measures to sanitize their digital footprints. This includes removing sensitive posts, unfollowing accounts, and tightening privacy settings in an effort to mitigate the risk of visa rejection under the expanded vetting processes.

Despite the current slowdown, Indian students continue to represent the largest cohort of international students in the United States. According to Open Doors 2024, Indian students overtook their Chinese counterparts during the 2023–2024 academic year, becoming the top contributors to the foreign student population.

Nevertheless, the overall trend for 2024 has been one of decline. From January to September of the previous year, Indian students were granted 64,008 F-1 visas, a decrease from 103,000 in 2023 and 93,181 in 2022.

Source: Original article

Immigration Officials Warn Green Card Holders of New Risks

Staff ReporterImmigration, U.S., Visa 0

Green card holders in the United States have been cautioned that their legal status could be at risk if they have a criminal record and violate immigration laws.

Federal authorities have issued a warning to green card holders, noting that the U.S. government has the power to revoke legal residency for those who break and abuse national laws. A statement from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) emphasized that lawful permanent residents arriving at U.S. ports of entry with previous criminal convictions could face detention before removal proceedings.

The advisory comes amid heightened immigration enforcement under the Trump administration, which has vowed to deport millions of undocumented immigrants as part of a stringent deportation strategy. The administration has labeled anyone present in the country illegally as a “criminal.”

In addition to focusing on undocumented individuals, the government’s rigorous operations have also subjected immigrants with valid visas and green cards to detention. Various reports have highlighted numerous instances of green card holders being ensnared in immigration raids.

Reports from the Office of Homeland Security Statistics estimate that 12.8 million lawful permanent residents, or green card holders, were living in the United States as of January 1, 2024. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has stated that lawful permanent residents who breach immigration laws could lose their status and face deportation procedures.

Amelia Wilson, an assistant professor at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law and director of the Immigration Justice Clinic, underscored that there are defined legal protections in place to prevent abrupt revocation of a green card holder’s status. “The law contained within the Immigration and Nationality Act is clear,” Wilson explained to Newsweek. “The Department of Homeland Security cannot unilaterally ‘revoke’ a permanent resident’s status. There is a process the agency must follow, including serving the individual with a ‘Notice of Intent to Rescind,’ at which time that individual is entitled to a hearing before an immigration judge.”

Under the Trump administration, agencies such as CBP, USCIS, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have embarked on comprehensive social media campaigns. These campaigns encourage undocumented immigrants to self-deport, highlight criminal arrests, and maintain a significantly larger online presence than in previous administrations.

The administration is also taking action to revoke visas of foreign students allegedly involved in pro-Hamas activities, demonstrating, and distributing flyers on college campuses. This move is part of a broader executive order aimed at combating antisemitism and targeting supporters of extremist groups. The expanded crackdown includes immigration enforcement against pro-Palestinian activists holding green cards.

Several high-profile detentions have occurred, such as the case of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and Columbia graduate student, who was arrested at his university-owned apartment.

Wilson pointed out that during these proceedings, it falls upon the government to prove by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that a permanent resident should lose their status. “At that point, it is the immigration judge—and only the immigration judge—who can effectively strip an individual of their green card,” Wilson added.

Public officials have echoed similar sentiments about enforcement. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated on social media: “We will be revoking the visas and/or green cards of Hamas supporters in America so they can be deported.” In another statement, USCIS noted that “Green cards and visas will be revoked if an alien breaks the law, supports terrorism, overstays their permitted visit time, performs illegal work, or anything else that violates the terms on which we granted them this privilege or compromises the safety of our fellow Americans.” Additionally, CBP reminded green card holders that having a criminal history does not constitute exemplary behavior for lawful permanent residents, emphasizing that possessing a green card is a privilege, not a right.

Source: Original article

U.S. Visa Rule May Impact 420,000 Indian Students

Staff ReporterEducation, Immigration 0

The proposed U.S. student visa rule under review could impose fixed stays on F, J, and I visas, potentially affecting over 420,000 Indian students as they face increased uncertainty and costs.

The United States is contemplating a significant change to its student visa policy that may impact more than 420,000 Indian students. Under a proposed rule from the Department of Homeland Security, currently being reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget, the U.S. would impose fixed stays for holders of F, J, and I visas—encompassing students, exchange visitors, and foreign media professionals.

If implemented, this rule would replace the current “duration of status” policy, which allows students to stay as long as they remain enrolled full-time. Instead, students would confront fixed expiration dates on their visas. This adjustment would necessitate periodic applications for extensions, potentially causing delays and additional costs, according to Rajiv Khanna, managing attorney at Immigration.com. Khanna noted that the average extension request could take months, adding to the challenges faced by international students.

The change poses a particular concern for Indian students, who are the largest group of international students in the U.S. In 2024, over 420,000 Indian nationals were enrolled in American universities, per U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement data. The rule could disrupt individual academic journeys and strain the broader educational partnership between India and the U.S.

A similar proposal was introduced in 2020 under the Trump administration but did not advance. Its potential revival signals a move towards stricter visa policies, raising apprehensions among stakeholders. Critics warn that it could alter how “unlawful presence” is determined; currently, it commences only after a formal finding by immigration authorities. Under the new proposal, any overstay, intentional or not, could trigger it immediately.

Universities and colleges in the U.S. have opposed the change, arguing that it stems from exaggerated concerns about visa overstays. In 2023, the overstay rate for F, M, and J visas was 3.6 percent. There is also uncertainty about the rule’s implementation. If the DHS issues it as an interim final rule, it could come into effect immediately, bypassing public comment, and leaving institutions and students little time to adapt.

While the final rule hasn’t been published in the Federal Register, the policy’s direction highlights a shift in how the U.S. views international student flexibility, potentially affecting the attractiveness of U.S. education.

The impending change compounds anxiety for Indian students awaiting F-1 visa interview slots for the upcoming fall 2025 academic session. Frustrations have mounted among student communities, as evidenced by a widely shared Reddit post expressing worries about the unavailability of F-1 visa slots in India. The delay has left many students, who face August start dates, in a dilemma as they remain unable to secure required interviews at U.S. consulates in India.

Further complicating matters, in June, the U.S. Embassy in India specified that Indian applicants for F, M, or J student visas need to make their social media accounts public before attending their visa interviews.

According to The Times of India, these developments reflect the broader policy reassessment by the U.S., which may reshape the global perception and desirability of American higher education for international students.

Golden Visas: Costs in UAE, US, New Zealand, More

Staff ReporterImmigration, Global 0

The United Arab Emirates has introduced a nomination-based Golden Visa for Indians, distinct from traditional investment-driven residency programs.

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) government is launching a new Golden Visa specifically targeting Indian nationals, shifting the process from a traditional investment-based model to a nomination-based system.

India and Bangladesh have been selected as the initial countries to test this nomination-based visa system. The UAE has appointed the Rayad Group consultancy to oversee the introduction of this visa in India.

Golden Visas have become an attractive option for high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) seeking to relocate overseas either immediately or for future retirement plans. These visas grant the right to live, work, study, and access healthcare in the host country.

Various countries offer the Golden Visa under different programs, tailored mainly to affluent foreigners willing to invest in the host country’s economy or meet certain conditions. Here’s a look at five such countries and the costs associated with obtaining their Golden Visas:

United Arab Emirates: The UAE’s new nomination-based Golden Visa for Indians allows for pre-approval from the applicant’s home country without requiring a visit to Dubai. This lifetime visa comes with a fee of AED 100,000, approximately ₹23.30 lakh.

United States: During his presidency, Donald Trump announced the Trump Gold Card Golden Visa aimed at wealthy individuals who invest in the United States in exchange for permanent residency.

New Zealand: The Active Investor Plus Visa, launched in September 2022, permits beneficiaries to live, work, and study indefinitely in New Zealand, subject to investment and residency requirements. The minimum investment begins at NZD 5 million.

Canada: Known as the Canada Start-Up Visa Program, this plan offers permanent residency to entrepreneurs and investors willing to set up businesses in Canada. The cost ranges from $215,000 to $275,000, depending on the start-up venture.

Singapore: The Singapore Global Investor Program targets entrepreneurs, business owners, and managers intending to establish businesses in the country. Successful applicants can secure permanent residence within 9 to 12 months, with an investment starting at SGD 10 million and potentially reaching SGD 50 million, based on business size.

These Golden Visa programs provide various pathways for individuals seeking permanent residence options outside their home countries by leveraging economic contributions or specific qualifications, according to LiveMint.

Green Card Holders Affected by Trump’s Immigration Bill

Staff ReporterHealth, Immigration, Politics 0

The One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB), signed into law by President Donald Trump, is set to significantly impact green card holders and legal immigrants by restricting access to some health benefits and imposing new taxes on overseas remittances.

President Donald Trump’s recently signed One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) introduces measures that could heavily impact legally present immigrants, including those holding green cards, by changing how they access certain health benefits and imposing a new tax on money sent abroad.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the OBBB will lead to 11.8 million more Americans being uninsured by 2034 and will increase the federal deficit by almost $3.3 trillion over the next decade. This legislation could result in 1.3 million lawfully present immigrants losing their health insurance by 2034, according to the CBO. Trump signed the bill into law on July 4.

Under current U.S. policy, lawful permanent residents, refugees, survivors of domestic violence, and individuals on valid work or student visas can purchase insurance through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace. Many of these groups qualify for federal tax credits that help reduce monthly insurance premiums, while others may be eligible for Medicaid or Medicare, based on income and other criteria.

The OBBB, however, intends to limit access to these benefits. It may prevent some lawfully present immigrants from benefiting from federal health insurance subsidies. Immigrants most affected could include low-income green card holders still within the five-year waiting period for Medicaid along with refugees and survivors of domestic violence, who may face a loss of subsidized health insurance.

If the bill is fully enacted, only green card holders, select individuals from Cuba and Haiti, and some Pacific Island communities would continue to receive federal benefits. Most immigrant groups, regardless of legal status, could lose access to affordable healthcare options.

Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies at the Cato Institute, commented on the bill, noting that immigrants consume fewer government-supplied health benefits compared to native-born Americans. Nowrasteh views the bill as a start to widen this gap, suggesting it could benefit taxpayers without adversely affecting the health of excluded non-citizens.

In addition to healthcare changes, the OBBB will introduce a 1 percent tax on remittances sent overseas, impacting millions of immigrant families who send financial support to relatives in their home countries. Supporters of the measure argue it could generate significant federal revenue, but critics point out it places a financial strain on low to middle-income workers reliant on these remittances to support their families abroad.

The legislation also allocates significant funds to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), including $45 billion to expand detention capacities to nearly 100,000 beds, $14 billion for transportation and deportations, and $8 billion for hiring 10,000 additional deportation officers.

Veronique de Rugy, a Senior Research Fellow with the Mercatus Center, highlighted the economic implications of the tax on remittances, explaining that it effectively reduces household income, potentially pushing families back into poverty and damaging local economies.

Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, emphasized that the OBBB aims to protect vulnerable Americans by eliminating waste and fraud in Medicaid and fulfilling President Trump’s campaign promise to strengthen border security and deport criminal illegal aliens.

Conversely, John Slocum, Executive Director of Refugee Council USA, expressed concerns about the bill’s potential to reverse decades of bipartisan support for newcomer integration. He warned that refugees and immigrant families could face significant hardships, impacting their recovery and integration into U.S. communities.

The OBBB’s enactment might result in hundreds of thousands of lawfully present immigrants, including asylum seekers, trafficking survivors, and refugees, losing access to ACA marketplace coverage, with the elimination of subsidies that help make healthcare premiums more affordable.

Banks and Telecom Surpass Tech in H-1B Visa Hiring

Staff ReporterImmigration, Business 0

Major banks and telecommunications companies have surpassed technology giants as the leading recruiters of H-1B visa workers in recent years, reshaping the landscape of foreign talent employment in the United States.

From May 2020 to May 2024, significant players such as Citigroup, AT&T, and Capital One have emerged as top recruiters of foreign labor through staffing and outsourcing agencies, according to data analyzed by Bloomberg. This trend marks a notable shift from previous years, where technology firms in Silicon Valley dominated H-1B visa hiring.

The H-1B visa is crucial for U.S. companies requiring individuals for specialty occupations demanding theoretical or technical expertise. Fields actively engaging H-1B workers include information technology, engineering, finance, and healthcare.

Applicants must possess a job offer from a U.S. employer and hold at least a bachelor’s degree or its equivalent in their field to qualify for the visa. The initial grant is for up to three years and can be extended to a maximum of six. Each fiscal year, the U.S. government issues 65,000 H-1B visas with an additional 20,000 allotted to applicants with a U.S. master’s degree or higher.

The perpetual high demand for these visas has necessitated a lottery system. Employers are required to submit a Labor Condition Application to ensure fair wages and working conditions for their H-1B employees. This program remains critical for enabling U.S. businesses to leverage global talent and address skill shortages.

India has consistently emerged as a leading source of H-1B applicants. The country accounts for roughly 70–75% of all petitions due to its robust tech industry and close ties with U.S. technology firms. China follows as the second-largest contributor, contributing about 11–13% of applications. Other countries like Canada, South Korea, and the Philippines each represent under 1% of the total.

The global workforce distribution, particularly in IT, engineering, and healthcare, highlights how U.S. companies rely heavily on skilled professionals from these countries to meet their labor demands.

Bloomberg’s report reveals that Citigroup Inc. added over 3,000 new H-1B workers during this four-year span—surpassing prominent tech companies like Nvidia, Oracle, and Qualcomm. However, most of these hires are not direct employees but rather contractors through third-party firms. A significant portion came via outsourcing companies like Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (TCS), which is currently under investigation by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for possible discrimination against non-Indian workers.

In response to these allegations, a spokesperson for TCS stated, “Allegations that TCS engages in unlawful discrimination are meritless and misleading. TCS has a strong track record of being an equal opportunity employer in the US, embracing the highest levels of integrity and values in our operations.”

Citigroup also addressed questions about their hiring approach, saying, “We supplement our 71,000 US workers with highly skilled H-1B visa holders to address specific, timely needs. When we do so, we follow relevant laws and regulations, including anti-discrimination laws.”

Bloomberg’s analysis suggests that H-1B contractors receive significantly lower compensation than their direct counterparts. While software developers through staffing agencies reported median earnings of $94,000, those directly employed earned $142,000, even while factoring in job title, education, and experience.

The disparity in wages has drawn criticism concerning the program’s aim to recruit the highest caliber of professionals. “If the whole purpose of this program is to hire the best of the best, then why aren’t we seeing higher wages?” remarked Susan Houseman of the W.E. Upjohn Institute, after examining the findings.

Despite this critique, proponents of the H-1B program argue it addresses critical skill shortages in the U.S. workforce by bringing in unique expertise that complements the existing labor pool and maintains company competitiveness globally. They further assert that there are built-in protections to guard against wage abuse, though acknowledging that enforcement poses challenges.

The redirection of H-1B workers from tech to telecom and banking indicates that skilled foreign professionals are increasingly finding career opportunities outside of traditional technology firms.

According to Bloomberg.

Source: Original article

US Visa Waiver 2025: Updated Eligible Countries List

Staff ReporterTravel, Immigration 0

The United States’ Visa Waiver Program (VWP) allows citizens from select countries to visit without applying for a traditional visa, simplifying travel for millions.

The United States remains a popular destination for international tourists, offering vibrant cities, diverse cultures, and numerous exploration opportunities. While the visa process can be challenging, the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) provides a simplified travel method for eligible travelers from certain countries, permitting entry without the need for a traditional visa.

The VWP is a travel agreement that lets citizens from participating countries enter the U.S. for up to 90 days for purposes such as tourism, business meetings, or brief transits. However, it does not cover activities like work, study, or extended stays beyond the 90-day limit. Instead of attending visa interviews and completing extensive paperwork, travelers need only apply for travel authorization through the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), an easy-to-use online approval system.

As of 2025, the VWP includes 43 countries, with Qatar and Romania being the newest additions in 2024 and 2025, respectively. The list mainly features European nations, as well as other countries like Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Australia, and New Zealand. To participate, travelers must be citizens of one of these countries and fulfill the entry conditions.

Before booking a flight to the U.S., travelers must meet several eligibility requirements: possessing a biometric e-passport with a chip containing personal data, valid for at least six months beyond their planned departure; obtaining an approved ESTA, which costs $21 and typically receives swift approval; having a round-trip or onward ticket demonstrating intent to exit the U.S. within the 90-day period; and having no criminal record or prior visa overstays, as these factors may lead to disqualification.

Traveling under the VWP involves a straightforward process. First, ensure your e-passport is valid for your entire stay. Then, apply for ESTA by visiting esta.cbp.dhs.gov, completing the application, paying the fee, and saving the confirmation. Next, book a flight with a participating airline, as most major carriers are part of the program. Upon arrival in the U.S., a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer will check your documents. If all is in order, you can enjoy up to 90 days of travel within the country.

To avoid any issues during the trip, travelers should steer clear of some common mistakes such as using ESTA for purposes not permitted under the VWP, overstaying the 90-day limit, failing to renew an expired ESTA, or traveling without an e-passport. Violating these rules can result in denied entry or future travel restrictions.

The Visa Waiver Program is vital for making travel to the U.S. more accessible and faster for millions of people. It promotes tourism, fosters global business connections, and reduces administrative burdens for travelers and immigration officers alike. For those eligible, the VWP offers an efficient and cost-effective route to explore the United States without the need for visa interviews or lengthy processing times.

As long as travelers adhere to the program’s rules, have a valid e-passport, and secure their ESTA authorization beforehand, the Visa Waiver Program remains a convenient option to experience the U.S. without the usual red tape.

Catholic Church Opposes MAGA-Backed Bill, Calls It a Moral Failure

Staff ReporterImmigration, Opinion, Politics 0

The proposed legislation allocates billions toward aggressive immigration enforcement and cuts vital health and food assistance programs, drawing widespread condemnation from faith leaders across the United States.

A controversial legislative proposal is drawing significant criticism from religious leaders nationwide due to its heavy investment in aggressive immigration enforcement and proposed cuts to healthcare and food assistance. Faith leaders are voicing concerns over the ethical implications and potential social consequences of such a move.

The bill primarily focuses on allocating over $150 billion towards enforcing border policies and bolstering immigration crackdowns. This includes a dramatic increase in the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention budget, set to grow from $3.4 billion to $45 billion by 2029. Professor Donald Moynihan of the University of Michigan highlighted that the ICE budget would surpass the combined funding for all 50 federal prisons.

Critics argue that this immense funding could create a self-perpetuating deportation infrastructure, drawing parallels to the private prison system and military complex. As with military spending, increased funding could incentivize further crackdowns and family separations, leading to a cycle of enforcement.

The legislation also targets faith communities by removing places of worship from the Department of Homeland Security’s sensitive locations list, making it easier for ICE agents to conduct enforcement actions there. Consequently, many religious communities have reported declines in attendance, as the threat of enforcement deters families from practicing their faith.

Prominent Catholics, including Cardinal Robert McElroy and Bishop Jaime Soto, alongside leaders from Episcopalian, Jewish, Lutheran, Presbyterian, and Muslim communities, have signed a letter opposing the bill. They argue that the legislation’s focus on a border wall could drive migrants into remote regions, increasing the risk of deaths, harming the local environment, and forcing asylum-seekers to rely on human smugglers.

Religious leaders advocate for creating legal migration avenues and a legalization program for immigrants who have long contributed to the U.S. economy. They assert these alternatives would better serve immigrants and the nation than a mass deportation campaign.

The bill also proposes severe cuts to healthcare and food assistance, including slashing nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid. This reduction could jeopardize countless lives, leading to increased poverty, bankruptcies, and closures of vital healthcare facilities. Additionally, the bill aims to cut approximately $186 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by 2034, raising concerns about food insecurity for millions.

According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the legislation would exacerbate income inequality by transferring wealth from the nation’s poorest citizens to the wealthiest. This aspect particularly troubles faith leaders, who emphasize the moral obligation to support the most vulnerable.

Archbishop Timothy P. Broglio, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, criticized the bill for offering tax breaks to some while undermining social safety nets through significant cuts to nutrition assistance and Medicaid. He noted the bill’s failure to protect families and children by exclusively focusing on enforcement rather than preserving access to legal protections.

Faith leaders argue the bill’s approach is a moral failure, urging lawmakers to find a better path forward. They call on senators to reconsider the provisions, emphasizing the need to protect human dignity and uphold the common good.

NRIs Can Avoid New US Remittance Tax by Paying Differently

Staff ReporterFinance/Economy, Immigration 0

The U.S. Senate has significantly lowered the proposed remittance tax from 5% to 1%, with exemptions for transfers made through specific banking methods, easing concerns for Indian expatriates.

Indian diaspora communities are expressing relief following an important development in the ongoing debate over the U.S. remittance tax. The latest iteration of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” introduces a significant reduction of the initially proposed 5% remittance tax down to 1%, effective January 1, 2026. More crucially, the bill exempts remittances sent via bank accounts, Automated Clearing House (ACH) transfers, and U.S.-issued debit or credit cards from this tax. These provisions make such channels the optimal means for sending money home without additional costs.

The proposed levy has been a topic of considerable discussion among non-resident Indians (NRIs) and Indian expatriates, especially after a tweet on X (formerly known as Twitter) emphasized an important clarification: remittances will not incur the tax if paid via ACH transfer or debit card, methods commonly used by Indians.

A remittance tax is a levy imposed by a government on the transfer of money by individuals from one country to another. In this context, the U.S. remittance tax targets non-citizens, including Indian NRIs, green card holders, and foreign students, sending funds abroad.

Initially proposed at a 5% rate, the tax underwent several revisions, being first reduced to 3.5% by the U.S. House of Representatives and eventually capped at 1% by the Senate. This tax is intended to help fund domestic priorities and reinforce immigration policies. Remittance service providers, such as banks and money transfer operators like Western Union, will collect the tax and transfer the funds to the U.S. Treasury quarterly. The tax applies regardless of the remittance amount.

One of the key components of the revised bill is the exemption granted for remittances made through ACH transfers, debit cards, credit cards, and verified U.S. bank accounts. These common payment channels, often used by NRIs to send money to India, will not be subject to the 1% tax, providing significant financial relief. This shift promotes the use of formal banking methods and lessens the financial load of conventional transfers covering family support, education fees, and investments.

India stands as the largest recipient of remittances worldwide, receiving approximately $33 billion from the U.S. during the fiscal year 2024. This marks almost 28% of India’s total remittance inflow. Without the revised tax provisions, Indian families relying on these funds could have faced substantial financial strain.

This development highlights the importance of strategic financial policy, balancing the need for revenue generation with the impacts on migrant communities and their contributions to home countries. According to Financial Express, the exemptions are set to foster continued use of banking channels by NRIs, thus sustaining essential economic support for families and communities in India.

Law Targeting Nazis May Strip Citizenship from More Americans

Staff ReporterUSA, Immigration 0

The U.S. Department of Justice, under the Trump administration, is looking to expand its denaturalization efforts, placing millions of naturalized citizens at potential risk of losing their citizenship.

The Justice Department (DOJ) has traditionally employed denaturalization powers to revoke citizenship from those who falsely obtained it or hid significant parts of their past, such as former Nazis. However, a recent memo indicates a potential broadening of this scope under the current Trump administration, raising concerns among legal experts.

According to the memo, attorneys are now instructed to focus their efforts on denaturalizing individuals who may pose a “potential danger to national security.” This marks a shift that aligns with the administration’s stringent immigration policies and could affect a significant number of naturalized citizens by risking their deportation.

The efforts prioritize individuals who have committed violent crimes or are associated with gangs, drug cartels, or have engaged in fraudulent activities. The memo, issued by the head of the DOJ’s Civil Division, outlines these priorities.

Experts and officials are voicing concerns that the broader initiative may instill fear among legal immigrants, especially those critical of the Trump administration. Cassandra Burke Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, expressed concern about this potential politicization of citizenship, stating, “The politicization of citizenship rights is something that really worries me, I think it’s just flatly inconsistent with our democratic system.”

This current effort harkens back to a McCarthy-era statute initially used to identify Communists. Over the years, it has primarily targeted war criminals, marked by the establishment of a DOJ unit in 1979 which focused on deporting individuals affiliated with the Nazis.

More historic efforts included Operation Janus under the Obama administration, focusing on identity theft in obtaining citizenship. Trump had previously attempted to extend denaturalization by establishing a specialized office at the DOJ in 2020, which was later dismantled by the Biden administration.

On returning to power, Trump has aimed to remodel immigration enforcement broadly, enlisting agencies like the FBI and U.S. Marshals in deportation efforts and scrutinizing foreign student visas. The new directive does not revive the prior office; instead, it prompts the entire Civil Division to prioritize denaturalization “in all cases permitted by law,” as per the memo. This guidance suggests that U.S. attorneys across the nation should highlight cases potentially suitable for denaturalization proceedings.

During Trump’s first term, 102 denaturalization cases were filed, compared to the 24 cases filed under Biden, stated Chad Gilmartin, a DOJ spokesperson. In Trump’s second term, five cases have been filed in its initial five months.

The DOJ clarified, “Denaturalization proceedings will only be pursued as permitted by law and supported by evidence against individuals who illegally procured or misrepresented facts in the naturalization process.” However, several current and former DOJ officials expressed concern that the memo’s broad directives could be used to expel individuals based on vague allegations.

Robertson noted that the administration might seek out historical errors in the naturalization process of political opponents, including student activists. Irina Manta, a law professor at Hofstra University, suggested the policy change could stifle free speech due to fear among citizens, stating, “I regularly observe the fear firsthand.”

Adding to this concern, Trump has suggested deporting certain American citizens, although his seriousness remains ambiguous. He has implied that the administration should potentially examine removing individuals, like criticizing businessman Elon Musk, following a disagreement over policy.

In a formal step reflecting this stance, Congressman Andy Ogles recently requested Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate whether Zohran Mamdani, a New York City mayoral candidate and naturalized citizen from Uganda, should be considered for denaturalization due to his political expressions in support of contentious figures.

The broader implications of these potential policy shifts remain provocative, with significant apprehension among legal professionals and immigrants distressed over what may follow, according to CNN.

Source: Original article

“The World’s Happiest Man” Premieres at NAIFF 2025 Festival

Staff ReporterImmigration, Entertainment 0

The U.S. premiere of “The World’s Happiest Man” at the Nepal-America International Film Festival 2025 highlighted the power of cinema to bridge diverse cultures and address compelling immigrant narratives.

The much-anticipated U.S. premiere of the feature film “The World’s Happiest Man” was celebrated during a red-carpet event on June 28, 2025, at the AFI Silver Theatre and Cultural Center in Silver Spring, Maryland. The event was a part of the Nepal-America International Film Festival (NAIFF), which showcased more than 30 films from 14 countries, running from June 26-29 across venues in Silver Spring and Greenbelt, Maryland.

“We’re trying to bridge diverse cultures in the United States through cinema,” said Purna Baraili, president of the Nepal America Film Society, which has hosted the NAIFF annually since 2017. This year’s festival featured critically acclaimed films such as “Shambhala,” directed by Min Bahadur Bham, which opened the festival and previously competed at the Berlin International Film Festival. The festival closed with “Pooja, Sir,” directed by Deepak Rauniyar, which initially premiered at the Venice International Film Festival.

Baraili acknowledged the significant contributions of Director Binod Paudel and legendary Nepali actor, filmmaker, and comedian Hari Bamsha Acharya, who were both present at the June 28 screening of “The World’s Happiest Man.” Director Paudel explained that the film centers on Nepali-speaking Bhutanese refugees who were expelled from Bhutan between 1998 and 1990. Having initially settled in Nepal for 22 years, many were subsequently resettled in the United States. The movie narrates the story of one individual living in the U.S. who desires to return to Bhutan but faces continual rejection of his visa applications. The film portrays the intricate psychological journey of this individual.

Paudel emphasized that the film explores the intergenerational dynamics of exile and adaptation, showing an older generation longing for their homeland, a middle generation caught between cultures, and a younger generation embracing an American identity. “This is an immigrant story. The movie captures the essence of the psychological journey of these generations at the same time,” he stated.

The concept of the film originated in Ohio in 2020, as Paudel observed an alarming frequency of suicides among the Bhutanese refugee community, often attributed to identity crises and psychological trauma. He developed the screenplay as a fictional narrative deeply rooted in real-life experiences after conducting research and speaking with affected families.

Filmed in various locations in Akron, Ohio, “The World’s Happiest Man” was completed and released in 2025. Expressing gratitude, Paudel said, “I was quite lucky that Acharya accepted my script and decided to act in my film.” Actor Acharya commented on his involvement, saying, “I was very impressed with his script. I read it three times and was happy that he reached out to me. I have seen his work previously as well. He also made a beautiful Nepali movie called ‘Bulbul.’ So, I agreed to the offer.”

“Bulbul” had also been screened at NAIFF in a previous edition. Paudel reiterated his long-standing support for Baraili and the Nepal America Film Society. Acharya noted that despite his over 20 visits to the U.S., this marked his first time attending a film festival in the country.

Actress Aditi Pyakurel, a Bhutanese refugee who also appeared in “The World’s Happiest Man,” shared her experiences with the film, stating, “It was fun acting in this movie – a story that’s like my own that I’ve seen reflected so much within my community.”

Meanwhile, Director Min Bahadur Bham, whose film “Shambhala” opened the festival, described it as his second feature, which was shot in the high Himalayas at altitudes ranging from 4,000 to 6,500 meters—a region known as one of the highest human settlements on Earth. Bham shared his inspiration, saying, “I used to hallucinate about my previous life. I always saw myself in some strange mountain village, as a young monk. Since that time, I was always curious to discover that place.”

Bham recounted writing a poem about reincarnation at 12 years old and a short story on the same theme during high school. After completing his first feature in 2015, he visited the village that had appeared in his visions and was amazed by the familiarity of every detail, from its landscapes and monastery to the local monks.

Among the attendees of the June 28 screening was director and producer Vijaykumar Mirchandani. Though his film was not selected for NAIFF this year, he came to support his peers. “But it’s always good to come and support your peers. I’m here to support one of the producers of the film, Kirtana Banskota, who is a friend of mine. She’s also an actor director for my next short film,” he said.

Kirtana Banskota, a co-founder of the Nepal America Film Society and NAIFF, traveled from Austin, Texas, for the festival. “The festival was founded in 2017 with the sole purpose of not only bridging communities together but also highlighting Nepali films,” she noted. NAIFF, supported by Prince George’s County, Maryland, is committed to offering local filmmakers opportunities to showcase their work alongside international cinema, according to South Asian Herald.

Source: Original article

DHS Adds New Languages to CBP Home Mobile App to Support Voluntary Self-Deportation Under Project Homecoming

Staff ReporterImmigration, Technology 0

Chinese and Hindi added to the CBP Home Mobile App

WASHINGTON – The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced it is adding two new languages to the CBP Home Mobile App: Simplified Chinese and Hindi. This update dramatically expands the app’s accessibility to make it easier for millions of illegal aliens to voluntarily self-deport under President Trump’s Project Homecoming initiative.

With these new additions, even more illegal aliens can take control of their departure, avoid detention, and manage their return with dignity and order.

“There is ZERO excuse for you to stay in the United States if you are an illegal alien. The United States taxpayer is generously offering those in this country illegally $1,000 and a free flight home.” said DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. “These new languages make it easier than ever for illegal aliens to do the right thing and self deport with dignity and order. Don’t make us come after you. If we do, you will be arrested, fined, deported, and never allowed to return. Download the CBP Home Mobile App and leave NOW.”

Through Project Homecoming, illegal aliens who self-deport using the CBP Home Mobile App benefit from several incentives, including:

  • Cost-free travel to their home country or another country where they have lawful status.
  • Forgiveness of civil fines for failure to depart after a final order or voluntary departure order.
  • A $1,000 exit bonus upon confirmed return, using the mobile app.
  • Preserve the potential opportunity to return to the United States the right, legal way.

CBP Home is available for free on any Apple or Android device via Apple’s App Store and Google Play, or directly from DHS.gov. For further information, visit DHS.gov/CBPhome.

Manjusha P. Kulkarni and Priyamvada Natarajan Chosen for ‘Pride of America Award’

Staff ReporterIndian, Immigration 0

Celebrating Indian American Excellence Among 2025 Carnegie Honorees

Every year, the United States pauses to shine a spotlight on the remarkable achievements of immigrants who have shaped the nation’s story. One of the most prestigious recognitions in this sphere is the “Pride of America Award,” an honor bestowed upon distinguished naturalized citizens who have made extraordinary contributions to American society.

Organized by the Carnegie Corporation of New York, this annual tradition—now in its nineteenth year—celebrates the enduring power and promise of immigration. During a solemn ceremony, this esteemed accolade was conferred upon 20 exceptional individuals hailing from 16 different countries. The award spotlights individuals whose work uplifts and advances equity, inclusion, and visibility across sectors.

Two stellar representatives of the Indian American community, Manjusha P. Kulkarni and Priyamvada Natarajan, were named to the “Great Immigrants, Great Americans” list, a testament to their dedication, leadership, and transformative impact.

Manjusha P. Kulkarni: Champion of Justice and Equity

Born in India and raised in the United States, Manjusha P. Kulkarni has emerged as a formidable advocate for social justice, equity, and civil rights. As the Executive Director of the AAPI Equity Alliance, Kulkarni leads one of the most influential organizations representing the interests of 1.6 million Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in Los Angeles County. In this role, she has been a relentless voice for marginalized communities, working to advance policies and programs that dismantle systemic barriers and foster inclusion.

Kulkarni’s commitment to justice extends far beyond organizational leadership. She is a co-founder of Stop AAPI Hate, the largest reporting center in the United States dedicated to addressing hate incidents targeting Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. Under her guidance, Stop AAPI Hate has played a critical role in documenting, analyzing, and responding to the alarming surge of anti-AAPI sentiment and violence in recent years. Her tireless efforts have not gone unnoticed: in addition to being named one of TIME magazine’s 100 Most Influential People in the World, Kulkarni received the highly regarded James Irvine Leadership Award in 2024, recognizing her visionary leadership and steadfast advocacy.

Priyamvada Natarajan: Trailblazer in Astrophysics

Priyamvada Natarajan’s journey from Tamil Nadu, India, to the upper echelons of American academia is a story of intellectual brilliance and scientific discovery. After moving to the United States to pursue higher education, Natarajan established herself as one of the world’s leading astrophysicists. She is currently a professor of astronomy and physics at Yale University, where her groundbreaking research explores the most profound mysteries of the universe: dark matter, dark energy, and black holes.

Natarajan’s pioneering work has significantly advanced our understanding of the cosmos, earning her numerous accolades and fellowships. Among her many honors are the Emeline Bigelow Conland Fellowship, the respected Guggenheim Fellowship, and the coveted 2025 Dannie Heineman Prize. In 2024, she joined the ranks of TIME magazine’s 100 most influential people, a fitting recognition for a scientist whose curiosity and expertise continue to expand the horizons of human knowledge.

A Moment of Pride for the Indian American Community

The recognition of Manjusha P. Kulkarni and Priyamvada Natarajan by the Carnegie Corporation of New York is a source of immense pride for the nearly five million people of Indian origin living in the United States. Their induction into the elite circle of “Great Immigrants, Great Americans” will take place on July 4th, coinciding with America’s Independence Day—a symbolic reminder of the ideals of freedom, opportunity, and pluralism that define the nation’s character.

Their stories, rooted in perseverance and the pursuit of excellence, are a beacon for aspiring immigrants across the world. By honoring these two exceptional women, America not only acknowledges their individual achievements but also reaffirms its enduring belief in the transformative power of diversity and inclusion. As their names join the historic roster of honorees, Kulkarni and Natarajan stand as living testaments to the promise of the American dream.

Honoring the Legacy of Indian American Achievement

The inclusion of Kulkarni and Natarajan in the 2025 cohort continues a proud tradition of Indian-origin individuals receiving this distinguished honor. In 2024, the award celebrated four such luminaries: Nobel laureate and economist Abhijit Banerjee; Dr. Ashish Kumar Jha, a leader in public health; Premal Shah, a visionary in social entrepreneurship; and Eboo Patel, a prominent interfaith advocate. These trailblazers joined an illustrious group of previous honorees, including Gita Gopinath, the former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund; Kamlesh Lulla, a renowned NASA scientist; Dr. Vivek Murthy, former U.S. Surgeon General; Pulitzer Prize-winning author Siddhartha Mukherjee; Santanu Narayen, CEO of Adobe; and Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet. Their stories embody the spirit of innovation, resilience, and community service that has long defined the immigrant experience.

Justice Department to Focus on Revoking Naturalized Citizenship

Staff ReporterConflict, Immigration 0

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is intensifying efforts to revoke the citizenship of naturalized Americans who have committed crimes, aligning with the Trump administration’s broader immigration policies.

The recent initiative by the DOJ emphasizes denaturalization, focusing on individuals involved in activities categorized under “war crimes,” “extrajudicial killings,” “human rights abuses,” and those posing ongoing threats, including terrorism. The directive is part of a memo, urging the DOJ’s Civil Division to prioritize these cases to the full extent permitted by law and supported by evidence.

This development marks a significant escalation in the Trump administration’s immigration agenda, which seeks to target not just undocumented immigrants but also lawful permanent residents and naturalized citizens.

Naturalization is the process by which U.S. citizenship is granted to a lawful permanent resident, following criteria set by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), there were 24.5 million naturalized citizens in the U.S. in 2022, accounting for 53% of the immigrant population, based on data analyzed by the Migration Policy Institute.

The path to naturalization is rigorous, requiring individuals to be lawful permanent residents for a minimum of five years—exceptions are made for spouses of U.S. citizens and U.S. military members—and to possess proficiency in English as well as an understanding of U.S. history and government.

The shift towards increased denaturalization began under the Obama administration, as noted by Cassandra Burke Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University. The rise was due in part to improved digital tools for identifying cases of naturalization fraud. The trend has accelerated under the Trump administration, which has been actively pursuing denaturalization at unprecedented levels.

Statistics from the DOJ indicate at least 305 denaturalization cases were filed between 1990 and 2017, with the number surging during Trump’s first term. From January 2017 to August 2018, USCIS reviewed approximately 2,500 cases for possible denaturalization, referring over 110 cases to the DOJ for prosecution.

The recent memo from Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate includes denaturalization among the top five priorities for the DOJ’s Civil Division. Denaturalization is pursued in instances where individuals have allegedly obtained citizenship fraudulently by concealment of material facts or willful misrepresentation.

Concerns over the constitutional aspects of these efforts have been voiced, with Robertson arguing that civil litigation to strip citizenship may violate due process under the 14th Amendment. The DOJ’s approach allows for the potential use of denaturalization as a tool against free speech, targeting individuals and institutions for allegations ranging from antisemitism to criticism of U.S. foreign policy.

The DOJ has already denaturalized individuals in cases involving serious criminal convictions. One case involved the revocation of citizenship from a person convicted of collecting and distributing child sexual abuse material.

This DOJ initiative reflects a broader strategy by the Trump administration to leverage immigration policy as a means to address national security and public safety concerns, often amidst debate over the balance between enforcement and civil liberties.

Source: Original article

Justice Department Intensifies Denaturalization Drive, Raising Constitutional Concerns

Staff ReporterImmigration, Cover, USA 0

The Justice Department is increasingly focusing on stripping U.S. citizenship from certain naturalized Americans. According to a memo dated June 11, DOJ leadership is instructing attorneys to prioritize denaturalization in cases involving naturalized citizens who have committed specific crimes. The directive also grants U.S. attorneys more authority in deciding when to pursue such actions. This policy shift targets individuals not born in the United States, and as of 2023, nearly 25 million immigrants had obtained U.S. citizenship through naturalization.

The new emphasis on denaturalization has already produced results. On June 13, a judge revoked the citizenship of Elliott Duke, an American military veteran originally from the United Kingdom who uses they/them pronouns. Duke had been convicted of distributing child sexual abuse material, a crime they later admitted to committing even before becoming a U.S. citizen.

Historically, denaturalization was a prominent tool during the McCarthy era in the late 1940s and early 1950s. It was further utilized during the Obama administration and expanded under President Trump’s first term. The process has typically targeted individuals who concealed past crimes or affiliations with banned organizations—such as the Nazi Party or communist groups—on their citizenship applications.

In his memo, Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate emphasized the importance of this effort: “The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.”

This renewed focus aligns with the Trump administration’s broader effort to reshape the U.S. immigration system. President Trump has made immigration policy a central issue in his governance, seeking to end birthright citizenship and reduce refugee admissions. These moves reflect a fundamental redefinition of who is entitled to American citizenship.

However, constitutional scholars and immigration experts have expressed significant alarm about this denaturalization push. Cassandra Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, noted that the DOJ’s reliance on civil litigation for denaturalization raises serious concerns. In civil court, those targeted do not have the right to government-appointed attorneys, the standard of proof is lower, and cases can be resolved more quickly.

Robertson warned, “Stripping Americans of citizenship through civil litigation violates due process and infringes on the rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.”

Still, the move has supporters. Hans von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation endorsed the initiative, stating, “I do not understand how anyone could possibly be opposed to the Justice Department taking such action to protect the nation from obvious predators, criminals, and terrorists.” Regarding concerns over legal representation, he added, “Nothing prevents that alien from hiring their own lawyer to represent them. They are not entitled to have the government — and thus the American taxpayer — pay for their lawyer.”

He further argued, “That is not a ‘due process’ violation since all immigration proceedings are civil matters and no individuals — including American citizens — are entitled to government-furnished lawyers in any type of civil matter.”

Neither the DOJ nor the Trump White House commented on the matter.

The June 11 memo significantly broadens the categories of offenses that could trigger denaturalization. These include crimes related to national security and fraud against individuals or the government, such as Paycheck Protection Program loan fraud or Medicaid and Medicare fraud.

Sameera Hafiz, policy director at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, described the administration’s new approach as “very shocking and very concerning.” She stated, “It is kind of, in a way, trying to create a second class of U.S. citizens,” implying that naturalized citizens remain vulnerable to losing their status despite having followed legal processes.

Adding to these concerns, the memo grants federal attorneys the discretion to pursue denaturalization cases beyond the listed categories. “These categories do not limit the Civil Division from pursuing any particular case,” the memo reads, further noting that priorities may include “any other cases referred to the Civil Division that the Division determines to be sufficiently important to pursue.”

Steve Lubet, professor emeritus at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law, found this language troubling. “Many of the categories are so vague as to be meaningless. It isn’t even clear that they relate to fraudulent procurement, as opposed to post-naturalization conduct,” he observed.

Von Spakovsky countered that the government is right to be uncompromising. “When we extend the opportunity for naturalization to aliens, we are granting them a great privilege — the privilege of becoming a U.S. citizen,” he said. “Anyone who has abused the privilege of the opportunity of becoming a U.S. citizen should have that citizenship revoked when they engage in such reprehensible behavior.”

Lubet also pointed out the broader implications for families, particularly children who derived citizenship through a naturalized parent. “People who thought they were safely American and had done nothing wrong can suddenly be at risk of losing citizenship,” he said.

The DOJ did not address questions about how children of denaturalized parents would be affected or what would happen if individuals were rendered stateless.

The case of Elliott Duke appears to be an early example of how the new denaturalization efforts might play out. Duke, who became a U.S. citizen in January 2013, was found to have started distributing child sexual abuse material while serving in Germany in 2012. Duke relinquished their U.K. citizenship to become an American. The DOJ filed the case in February in Louisiana, citing both the prior conviction and Duke’s failure to disclose criminal activity during the naturalization process.

During the legal proceedings, Duke struggled to secure representation and could not attend court in Louisiana. “My heart shattered when I read the lines [of the order]. My world broke apart,” Duke said.

Shumate, in a statement, warned, “If you commit serious crimes before you become a U.S. citizen and then lie about them during your naturalization process, the Justice Department will discover the truth and come after you.”

Laura Bingham, executive director of the Temple University Institute for Law Innovation and Technology, cautioned that the Duke case sets a worrying precedent. “Citizenship is not supposed to be something that you can continuously open up for some people, and you can’t for others,” she said.

Historically, denaturalization surged during the McCarthy era, with over 22,000 cases filed annually. “At the height of denaturalization, there were about 22,000 cases a year… It was huge,” Robertson recalled. However, a 1967 Supreme Court ruling curtailed the practice, citing its incompatibility with democratic values.

From that point until the Obama era, denaturalization became rare. The Obama administration revived it with initiatives like Operation Janus, which sought out potential naturalization fraud, especially linked to national security concerns.

Trump’s first term saw further expansion, with a preference for pursuing denaturalization through civil rather than criminal courts. Although Robertson questions how many cases will meet the criteria outlined in the recent memo, she fears the aggressive push may target individuals with minimal infractions. “It fits in with the other ways that we’ve seen immigration enforcement happening,” she said.

This recent policy shift marks a significant chapter in U.S. immigration enforcement, raising crucial questions about due process, equal protection, and the long-term security of naturalized citizenship.

US Embassy in India Emphasizes Strict Visa Screening and Social Media Disclosure as National Security Measure

Staff ReporterImmigration, Cover, USA 0

The United States Embassy in India has reiterated the stringent vetting procedures tied to its visa policies, describing each visa adjudication as a matter of national security. In a statement posted on the social media platform X, the embassy highlighted the requirement for all applicants to provide complete details of their social media presence over the last five years while applying for nonimmigrant visas.

“Visa applicants are required to list all social media usernames or handles of every platform they have used from the last 5 years on the DS-160 visa application form. Applicants certify that the information in their visa application is true and correct before they sign and submit,” stated the US Embassy in a recent post.

This disclosure requirement, according to the embassy, is an integral part of the broader national security screening process employed by the United States. Failing to comply with this requirement could have serious consequences. “Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas,” the post further warned.

This advisory is part of a broader campaign by the embassy to inform and caution visa applicants about the importance of accuracy and transparency in their applications. The embassy’s post included digital posters reiterating the security aspect of the visa process. One poster read, “Every U.S. visa adjudication is a national security decision,” and emphasized, “The United States requires visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on visa application forms. We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting.”

In a related update earlier this month, the embassy had urged applicants falling under F, M, or J non-immigrant visa categories to make their social media accounts public. This recommendation was made to aid US authorities in verifying applicants’ identities and establishing their admissibility under American law. These visa categories include F and M for students and J for exchange visitors.

The embassy elaborated that since 2019, the United States has mandated the disclosure of “social media identifiers” as part of both immigrant and non-immigrant visa applications. This long-standing requirement, according to the embassy, is vital to national security and helps immigration authorities thoroughly vet each applicant.

The embassy’s statements come amid a wider crackdown on immigration in the United States. Recently, the Trump administration intensified enforcement actions in Los Angeles, targeting immigration violations more aggressively. In light of this, the US Embassy in India has stepped up its communication, providing frequent updates on policy and legal expectations for visa applicants.

On June 24, the embassy issued another warning, stating that immigration law enforcement had been stepped up across the country. The message was unambiguous—those found violating immigration laws would face strict penalties, including detention, deportation, and permanent ineligibility for future visas.

Adding to this, the embassy’s statement noted, “The US had increased enforcement of immigration laws, and violators would face detention, deportation and permanent consequences for future visa eligibility.” The warning was not limited to overstays or misrepresentation; it also made it clear that illegal entry into the United States would result in jail time and removal from the country.

This was not the only caution issued during the month. On June 19, the embassy released another strongly worded statement reminding applicants that obtaining a US visa is not a guaranteed right but a discretionary privilege. It emphasized that screening and scrutiny continue even after a visa is issued. Authorities in the US reserve the right to revoke a visa if the holder is found in violation of any laws.

The embassy said, “A US visa was a privilege, not a right,” underscoring that post-issuance reviews are routine and can result in visa cancellation if necessary. It further added that involvement in illegal activities, including drug use or breaking US laws while in the country on a student or visitor visa, could severely impact one’s ability to receive future visas.

This line of messaging from the US Embassy in India has been consistent throughout the month. The campaign has included reminders that although the US continues to welcome legal travelers, any attempt to enter the country illegally or abuse the visa system will not be tolerated.

Reiterating this stance, the embassy made a significant statement on June 16, asserting that the United States “will not tolerate those who facilitate illegal and mass immigration to the US.” This message also revealed a policy shift: the US had introduced “new visa restrictions” aimed specifically at foreign government officials and individuals who violate immigration laws.

This multi-pronged approach by the US government reflects a broader tightening of immigration and visa processes, especially in the wake of mounting concerns around illegal immigration. With policies targeting both individual applicants and those facilitating unlawful entry, the US is sending a clear signal about the importance of legal compliance.

By highlighting these issues through multiple channels and on various dates, the US Embassy in India is working to ensure that prospective travelers are well aware of the rules and expectations. The detailed advisories, warnings about visa ineligibility, and emphasis on national security collectively serve to underline the gravity with which the US government views visa applications.

These measures not only aim to safeguard national interests but also serve as a deterrent for those considering bypassing legal immigration processes. By requiring disclosure of social media identifiers, encouraging transparency, and increasing legal enforcement, the United States is fortifying its immigration system against potential risks.

At the same time, the US government continues to stress that it welcomes legal immigration and supports those who abide by the rules. But any deviation from lawful practices will result in serious and lasting consequences.

The embassy’s message, repeated throughout June, is unambiguous: compliance with visa rules, honesty in the application process, and adherence to US laws are non-negotiable. The US authorities are equipped to detect discrepancies and enforce immigration laws without hesitation.

From urging public visibility of social media accounts to warning against drug use and law violations, the embassy has rolled out a series of reminders to leave no room for misunderstanding. These reminders serve both as guidance for sincere applicants and a deterrent for those contemplating any kind of misuse of the system.

Ultimately, the consistent tone and content of the embassy’s advisories reflect a strategic policy direction that prioritizes national security while maintaining opportunities for legal entry. Through transparency, accountability, and firm enforcement, the United States aims to maintain the integrity of its immigration system.

House Passes Bill to Deport Noncitizens Convicted of Drunk Driving

Staff ReporterImmigration, Cover, USA 0

The U.S. House of Representatives on Friday passed a bill that would mandate the deportation of noncitizens convicted of driving under the influence, according to a report by Breitbart. The legislation, titled the Jeremy and Angel Seay and Sergeant Brandon Mendoza Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act, was put forward by Representative Barry Moore, a Republican from Alabama. The bill is named in remembrance of victims who lost their lives due to accidents caused by intoxicated migrant drivers.

Representative Moore introduced the legislation to honor Jeremy and Angel Seay, a couple from his district, who were tragically killed when a noncitizen driving under the influence struck them while they were riding a motorcycle. Speaking to the Alabama Daily News, Moore said, “Their lives were cut short by the senseless act.” He added, “Tragedies like this are not uncommon across this country,” emphasizing the wider impact of such incidents involving impaired driving by noncitizens.

The bill has ignited a heated debate in Congress, receiving overwhelming support from Republican lawmakers. Most Republicans view the legislation as a necessary measure to safeguard American communities from individuals who repeatedly break laws and endanger lives through reckless behavior such as drunk driving. The bill aims to amend existing immigration policy by making DUI convictions grounds for mandatory deportation.

In contrast, 160 Democrats voted against the bill, raising concerns about the potential for overly broad enforcement and its implications for immigration justice. Opponents argue that while DUI offenses are serious, automatic deportation removes the opportunity for due process or context to be considered, especially for immigrants who may have lived in the U.S. for extended periods or have deep family and community ties.

Despite the partisan split, the legislation’s passage in the House marks a significant step in the ongoing political effort to link public safety and immigration enforcement. The bill now moves to the Senate, where its future remains uncertain, particularly given the different power dynamics and legislative priorities in that chamber.

Representative Moore, in advocating for the legislation, has highlighted personal tragedies such as those experienced by the Seay family to bring attention to what he sees as preventable deaths caused by lax immigration enforcement. By attaching specific names to the bill, including that of Sergeant Brandon Mendoza, a police officer killed in a similar incident, Moore is stressing the real-world consequences of policy gaps. Mendoza’s case, like that of the Seays, has become a symbol in political discussions about the intersection of immigration and criminal law.

“Their lives were cut short by the senseless act,” Moore repeated in statements to the press, underscoring the emotional weight behind the legislation. His remarks reflect a broader Republican viewpoint that public safety should take precedence in immigration decisions, especially when there is a criminal record involved.

The bill’s language stipulates that any noncitizen convicted of driving under the influence would be subject to mandatory removal from the United States. Supporters argue that the measure closes a loophole that allows dangerous individuals to remain in the country despite endangering others through impaired driving. Critics, however, caution that the legislation could lead to disproportionate punishment and may particularly impact certain immigrant communities more heavily than others.

Immigration rights groups and some Democratic lawmakers have expressed concerns that such legislation could further criminalize immigrant populations and erode trust between law enforcement and communities. They argue that while preventing DUI-related deaths is important, a one-size-fits-all deportation policy fails to take into account rehabilitation efforts, family situations, and other mitigating circumstances.

Still, proponents believe the law will serve as a deterrent to noncitizens who might otherwise engage in reckless behavior. By introducing automatic consequences for DUI convictions, supporters contend that the law strengthens both immigration policy and public safety.

The bill’s naming after specific victims adds a human face to what is otherwise a policy discussion, which may help in gaining public support. The use of personal stories has become a common legislative strategy to create empathy and urgency around specific issues, and Moore’s bill is a prominent example.

While the political divide on immigration-related bills continues to grow, this legislation’s focus on DUI offenses could garner some bipartisan interest in the Senate, especially among lawmakers who prioritize public safety. However, it is expected that the bill will face stronger opposition in the Senate, where Democratic control and a more moderate stance on immigration issues could result in amendments or outright rejection.

For now, the bill’s approval in the House reflects a broader Republican push to tighten immigration enforcement and prioritize citizen safety, especially in cases involving criminal behavior. Whether or not this bill becomes law, it has already sparked a national conversation about how the U.S. should handle immigration enforcement in cases involving criminal activity, and how policy can be crafted to prevent further tragedies like those that took the lives of Jeremy and Angel Seay.

With its passage, the House has signaled its stance on the matter, placing the burden of next steps on the Senate. If the bill passes there, it could significantly alter how DUI offenses are treated in the context of immigration law, potentially impacting thousands of noncitizens across the country.

Until then, the debate over balancing compassion in immigration policy with accountability for criminal conduct is likely to continue, both in Congress and among the American public.

USCIS to Change Text Alert Number Starting July 1: Applicants Urged to Save New Contact

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

Beginning July 1, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will implement a significant change in how it communicates via text messages with applicants. The federal agency, which oversees lawful immigration to the United States, has announced it will discontinue its current text alert number and begin using a new one.

Until now, USCIS has sent text messages to applicants from the number 468-311, which many came to recognize as GOV-311. This number will be retired, and all future messages will instead come from the new number 872466. The numeric sequence represents USAIMM, an abbreviation for “U.S.A. Immigration.” The agency’s move aims to improve clarity and foster trust among those receiving these messages.

This transition is particularly important for applicants who rely on USCIS text updates, such as notifications about the status of their immigration cases or reminders for scheduled appointments. The agency is encouraging everyone who receives these updates to save the new number in their contacts. Doing so, they say, will help avoid misidentifying official USCIS messages as spam or fraudulent texts.

The use of text alerts by USCIS is targeted primarily at applicants who opt for electronic communication. This preference is indicated by filing Form G-1145, which allows individuals to receive notifications via text and email. The text messages typically include a receipt number and guidance on how to check the status of a case on the USCIS website.

In a statement, USCIS clarified that the reason behind the number switch is to make it easier for applicants to recognize messages from the agency. It also seeks to improve the public’s confidence in the legitimacy of the communications they receive. The agency explained: “Effective July 1, 2025, USCIS will no longer send text (SMS) messages from the phone number 468-311 (GOV-311). Our new number will be 872466 (USAIMM).”

Form G-1145, officially known as the E-Notification of Application/Petition Acceptance, plays a supportive role in the immigration application process. While it does not directly confer any immigration benefit or legal status, many applicants attach it to other USCIS forms—such as Form I-485, used for applying for lawful permanent residency—to ensure they receive prompt acknowledgment when their documents are accepted. The form provides a receipt number and directs applicants to the tools they need to track case progress online, adding convenience and assurance in a process that can otherwise feel uncertain.

USCIS’s decision to update its text message system aligns with its broader push toward improving communication and technological efficiency. The new number is intended to reflect the agency’s identity more clearly and reduce the risk of applicants missing important updates due to unfamiliar sender information.

This change to the text alert system follows another update from USCIS earlier in June, which affected all new applications for permanent residency. The agency now requires applicants to submit an updated medical examination form with each new green card application. This marks a shift from the previous policy, where applicants could reuse medical forms indefinitely. The updated requirement is part of a series of recent adjustments in USCIS procedures.

Back in March, a more abrupt change in multiple immigration application forms caused widespread confusion among applicants and immigration lawyers. The sudden implementation of new forms, without sufficient notice, led to concerns and legal action. Immigration attorneys filed a lawsuit in response, urging the agency to provide a smoother transition. USCIS responded by modifying its policy and offering at least a two-week grace period for the new forms to become mandatory, giving applicants more time to adjust to the updated requirements.

In addition to procedural updates, USCIS continues to urge applicants to be vigilant about scams. The agency emphasized that it never requests payment or passwords via text message. If an applicant receives a suspicious text claiming to be from USCIS, the advice is clear: do not respond, and instead report the message through the official USCIS website. This warning serves as a reminder that scammers often attempt to exploit applicants during periods of administrative change.

Scammers have been known to mimic official government communications, making it essential for recipients to verify the source of any message. Saving the new 872466 number in a contact list will help reduce the risk of falling victim to such frauds. Additionally, individuals should remain wary of unsolicited messages requesting sensitive information or financial transactions.

With the July 1 transition date approaching, USCIS has provided straightforward guidance: individuals who receive text updates should immediately add the new number to their phone contacts and stop responding to or expecting valid messages from the former 468-311 number. “USCIS recommends that users add the new number to their contacts and disregard any texts from the old number beginning July 1,” the agency stated.

This measure is part of the agency’s continuing efforts to modernize and streamline its services while maintaining security and transparency for applicants. As the immigration process involves numerous steps, forms, and deadlines, clear communication from USCIS plays a vital role in ensuring that applicants remain informed and compliant.

To sum up, the main takeaway for all USCIS applicants is to update their contact list with the new number 872466, stay alert for official notifications, and continue using Form G-1145 to receive electronic updates. These small but crucial actions can help applicants avoid unnecessary delays or complications in their immigration journey.

By making this simple yet impactful adjustment in its messaging system, USCIS hopes to ensure that its communications are immediately recognizable and trusted. The agency’s recent actions, including the rollout of a new number and improvements to policy transparency, reflect its broader aim of providing better service in a landscape where timely and clear communication is more essential than ever.

In conclusion, while the change may seem minor, it represents a continuing evolution in USCIS’s approach to applicant engagement. By focusing on clarity, responsiveness, and fraud prevention, the agency aims to foster a more secure and streamlined process for those navigating the complexities of the U.S. immigration system. Applicants should take note, act accordingly, and remain cautious to ensure that their interactions with USCIS remain safe and effective.

Unshackled Conference 2025 in California to Empower High-Skilled Immigrants with Career and Immigration Insights

Staff ReporterCommunity, Immigration 0

The India Community Center in Milpitas, California, is set to host the highly anticipated Unshackled Conference 2025 from August 15 to 16. This major event is designed specifically for high-skilled immigrants in the United States, offering them critical tools and strategies to navigate the complex American immigration system and boost their career trajectories.

Spearheaded by Greencard Inc. in collaboration with Unshackled.club, the conference is positioned as a crucial platform for immigrant professionals. It aims to bridge the gap between ambition and immigration realities through sessions focusing on innovation, career development, and policy engagement.

With attendance expected to run into the thousands, the two-day event promises an enriching experience through its three simultaneous thematic tracks—Immigration, Innovation, and Impact. Each track is tailored to address the specific needs of attendees, covering key subjects ranging from visa pathways to personal branding and entrepreneurial growth.

On the immigration front, the conference will delve deep into U.S. visa categories such as EB-1A, EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW), O-1 for individuals with extraordinary abilities, and the EB-5 investor visa program. These discussions are designed to help professionals understand their options and map out effective strategies for securing permanent residency.

The Innovation track will feature practical advice on launching startups, navigating the tech ecosystem, and identifying scalable opportunities. This section is especially beneficial for founders and entrepreneurs seeking to balance immigration constraints with their business goals.

The Impact track will shed light on how immigrants can influence grassroots policy reform and build a strong personal brand. Topics such as storytelling for advocacy and community-driven change are expected to resonate with those who want to go beyond individual success and contribute meaningfully to broader social transformations.

A strong lineup of over 40 speakers will share their expertise and experiences across these themes. Among the headline names is Vijay Amritraj, the globally renowned sports commentator, actor, and retired professional tennis player, whose diverse career will serve as an inspiration to many navigating multidimensional paths.

Joining him will be Deedy Das, a principal at Menlon Venturs known for his investment acumen; Nikita Gupta, co-founder of Careerflow.ai, whose work lies at the intersection of career development and AI technology; and Vidya Srinivasan, lead product manager at Meta, who brings a wealth of experience from the tech world.

Another highlight of the conference is the opportunity for attendees to engage in free legal consultations, a crucial benefit for those wrestling with intricate immigration issues. This legal support will be available throughout the event, making it easier for participants to get personalized advice without the usual costs and barriers.

Panel discussions are also on the agenda, featuring immigration attorneys, startup mentors, recruiters, and public policy advocates. These sessions aim to offer holistic perspectives on navigating career and immigration hurdles in tandem. For job seekers, the visa-friendly job fair promises to be a game-changer, featuring participation from more than 50 startups based in the Bay Area. This career fair is tailored to accommodate international professionals and H-1B visa holders, making it a rare opportunity to connect with employers who understand the challenges and legalities involved in hiring global talent.

Adding to the event’s richness is a unique blend of community engagement and professional insight delivered by Craig Montuori and Danielle Goldman. Both are widely recognized for their contributions to immigrant entrepreneurship and visa reform. Their sessions are expected to strike a chord with those who want to take an active role in shaping a more inclusive immigration narrative in the United States.

The entertainment segment of the conference is not to be missed either. Kenny Sebastian, a celebrated comedian with a global following, will headline the entertainment portion of the conference. His performance is set to bring much-needed comic relief and celebration to an otherwise intense and knowledge-driven gathering.

The conference is designed to cater to a wide spectrum of participants including H-1B visa holders, international students, academic researchers, startup founders, and other professionals seeking employment-based permanent residency in the U.S. By covering a broad array of subjects and offering diverse formats—legal help, job fairs, panel discussions, and entertainment—the event promises a comprehensive experience for attendees.

Registrations are currently open and those interested can sign up to secure their spots for this major two-day conference. This event is particularly significant in today’s context, where high-skilled immigrants often find themselves navigating uncertainty around work visas and green card processing delays. By bringing together experts, community leaders, and solution-oriented sessions, Unshackled Conference 2025 is set to serve as a pivotal moment of clarity, empowerment, and opportunity for thousands in the immigrant professional community.

As the conference draws near, it is clear that the organizers aim to go beyond typical networking or educational events. They intend to spark meaningful change and equip immigrants with the tools and knowledge necessary to break free from bureaucratic bottlenecks and professional stagnation.

In summary, the Unshackled Conference 2025 is not just another event on the calendar—it is a dynamic, multi-dimensional forum crafted to address the unique struggles and aspirations of high-skilled immigrants in the United States. Through its three specialized tracks—Immigration, Innovation, and Impact—it offers something of real value for every participant, whether they are at the start of their immigration journey or well on their way toward permanent residency and professional growth.

The blend of high-profile speakers, visa guidance, job opportunities, and entertainment ensures that the two-day conference will leave a lasting impact on attendees. As Vijay Amritraj and others bring their stories and insights to the stage, the event will likely inspire a wave of new momentum within the immigrant community to continue pushing boundaries and forging new paths.

Registrations remain open, and prospective attendees are encouraged to sign up early to take full advantage of the sessions, consultations, and opportunities that await at the India Community Center in Milpitas on August 15 and 16.

How Immigration Powers the U.S. Economy and Secures Future Prosperity

Staff ReporterEconomy, Immigration 0

Immigration remains a powerful driver of the American economy, fueling growth, innovation, and economic resilience across sectors. Immigrants not only create jobs and raise wages but also reduce inflation, increase productivity, and contribute significantly to government revenues. Their presence enhances nearly every segment of the U.S. economy, particularly in critical areas such as healthcare, agriculture, construction, and rapidly developing fields like artificial intelligence and semiconductors.

This article highlights findings from various studies, including original research by FWD.us, showing how immigration delivers substantial benefits to the United States. As the brief notes, “Immigration will contribute to a $7 trillion increase in GDP and $1 trillion in additional government revenue over the next decade.”

Immigration is one of the most effective means of expanding and strengthening the U.S. economy. As the number of people purchasing goods and services rises, so too does the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), a primary measure of economic vitality. With this rise in demand, new businesses emerge, leading to job creation. One study found that immigrants are responsible for 17% of the U.S. GDP, which equals a staggering $3.3 trillion.

Because many immigrants are of working age and often possess strong entrepreneurial qualities, increased immigration leads to a rise in per capita GDP—essentially improving the average income per person. This translates to a higher standard of living and broader prosperity for the country.

Immigrants also play a critical role in funding public services through taxes. Every year, they contribute nearly $525 billion in taxes across federal, state, and local levels. These figures include contributions from refugees, asylum seekers, and undocumented individuals, who collectively pay close to $50 billion annually in taxes, despite having limited access to public benefits. These tax contributions help sustain key programs such as Social Security and ensure continued investment in schools, infrastructure, and other essential services.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) further supports these findings. In a report released in February, the CBO director stated that recent immigration trends have reduced the federal deficit. Over the next ten years, immigration is expected to generate a $7 trillion boost in GDP and contribute an additional $1 trillion in government revenue.

By contrast, limiting immigration would lead to a smaller economy, fewer jobs, and a reduction in the availability of goods and services. It could also undermine the country’s global economic leadership. The article warns that restricting immigration would leave the U.S. “smaller, poorer, and weaker.”

Immigrants are crucial to addressing workforce shortages and curbing inflation. As of 2022, immigrants accounted for 18.1% of the American labor force—a figure that continues to rise. Given that immigrants are more likely to be of working age, they help fill key gaps in industries facing chronic labor shortages.

In healthcare alone, immigrants make up over 18% of the workforce. This includes 26% of all physicians, 16% of registered nurses, and a striking 40% of home healthcare aides. These workers help alleviate the severe staffing crises in healthcare, many of which worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Moreover, newly arrived immigrants have been instrumental in resolving post-pandemic labor shortages and restoring disrupted supply chains. Many of these workers entered the U.S. through humanitarian parole and have played a pivotal role in stabilizing the economy.

Immigrants also have a strong presence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) occupations. Nearly 20% of all STEM workers are foreign-born. Additionally, international students make up about 40% of advanced STEM degree recipients in American universities. In areas like artificial intelligence and semiconductor manufacturing, their expertise is essential to keeping the U.S. at the forefront of innovation.

Research by FWD.us shows that immigration can ease inflation by closing labor market gaps that would otherwise drive consumer prices upward. In recent years, the increase in immigration has played a significant role in slowing inflationary trends and maintaining steady economic growth.

Immigrants are not only workers but also job creators. They establish new businesses at twice the rate of native-born Americans. In fact, 45% of Fortune 500 companies in 2023 were founded by immigrants or their children. Immigrants also founded 55% of U.S. startups that have achieved valuations of $1 billion or more.

There’s no evidence that immigrant workers displace native-born workers. On the contrary, immigration is linked to higher employment levels among Americans born in the U.S. While fears that immigration depresses wages are common, data shows minimal impact—and in many fields, especially those requiring high skills, immigrants actually help increase productivity and wage growth. Attempts to limit immigration often lead to outsourcing and job relocation to other countries, rather than improving employment prospects domestically.

Immigrants also significantly enhance American innovation. Despite making up only 16% of inventors in the U.S., they account for nearly a quarter of the country’s innovation output. Their contributions drive technological progress not only in the U.S. but globally.

Many of these innovators began their American journey as international students. During the 2022–2023 academic year alone, international students added $40.1 billion to the U.S. economy and supported more than 368,000 jobs.

Beyond the economy, immigration is also a demographic necessity. The U.S. population grew at its slowest rate between 2010 and 2020 since the 1930s, and the birth rate has continued to decline. Immigration helps counteract these trends by expanding the working-age population and encouraging family growth within the U.S. Immigrants also play vital roles in sectors that serve an aging population, particularly healthcare.

To maintain population stability and economic growth, the U.S. must raise immigration levels. FWD.us research indicates that increasing immigration by 50% annually would raise the working-age population by about 13% by 2040, providing a solid foundation to meet labor demands and support economic expansion.

This is especially crucial in rural America. Between 2000 and today, 77% of rural U.S. counties have seen a decline in working-age residents, which threatens local economies and reduces access to essential services. The study suggests that welcoming just 200 immigrants annually in these counties could reverse population decline in 71% of them by 2040.

Looking ahead, it is clear that immigration is not just beneficial but essential to America’s economic future. The data overwhelmingly supports the argument that immigrants help make the U.S. stronger and more prosperous. As the report concludes, “It is vital that U.S. policymakers should work to preserve and enhance the benefits of immigration by building new legal avenues and increasing opportunities for newcomers to support themselves, participate in their local communities, and contribute to the United States’ success and prosperity.”

Supreme Court Backs Trump in Narrowing Blocks on Birthright Citizenship Ban

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

In a significant ruling on Friday, June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with President Donald Trump by allowing the administration to limit nationwide judicial orders that had been preventing the enforcement of his controversial policy to end automatic citizenship for U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants and foreign visitors. This decision marks a crucial moment in Trump’s broader efforts to impose more restrictive immigration rules.

The 6-3 decision, with the court’s liberal justices in dissent, now returns the case to the lower courts. These courts are tasked with determining how this ruling should be applied in practice. While the Supreme Court did not directly address whether the birthright citizenship ban itself is constitutional, the judgment nonetheless clears a procedural hurdle for Trump’s policy to potentially advance further.

The Trump administration’s request to the high court did not focus on a definitive ruling about the legality of denying citizenship to children born in the U.S. under these circumstances. Instead, the administration argued that lower courts had overstepped their authority by issuing universal injunctions, which blocked the policy from taking effect across the entire country during ongoing litigation.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, challenged the legitimacy of these broad, nationwide court orders. She argued that such actions go beyond the judicial powers granted by Congress. “Some say that the universal injunction ‘give[s] the Judiciary a powerful tool to check the Executive Branch,’” she wrote. “But federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch; they resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given them. When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too.”

This reasoning reflects the court’s growing discomfort with the expansive power lower courts have used in recent years to block major federal policies nationwide. Justices and legal scholars have increasingly scrutinized the use of nationwide injunctions, particularly in cases involving contentious policies from both Democratic and Republican administrations.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, a liberal member of the court, issued a strongly worded dissent. Speaking directly from the bench, she expressed profound opposition to the ruling, describing it as a judicial failure with severe consequences. She stated that the decision was a “travesty” and warned that it would “cause chaos for the families of all affected children.”

The court’s ruling was among six released on the final day of its current term, highlighting the importance and urgency of the decisions being made. The ruling stops short of validating Trump’s executive order but does reduce the ability of lower courts to impose sweeping national blocks while the legality of such orders is being debated.

The use of nationwide injunctions has long sparked criticism from both Democratic and Republican leaders. These types of judicial orders, which halt the implementation of policies across the country, are intended to prevent potential harm while lawsuits proceed. However, critics argue they give disproportionate influence to individual judges and undermine the democratic process.

The broader issue underlying this legal battle is whether Trump has the authority to eliminate birthright citizenship for certain groups of U.S.-born children. The executive order signed by Trump on his return to office aims to deny citizenship to those born on American soil if neither parent is a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident.

Trump’s policy is part of a sweeping immigration agenda that seeks to reduce both legal and illegal immigration. His administration has previously moved to ban travelers from over a dozen nations, accelerate deportations—particularly of individuals suspected of gang affiliation from countries like Venezuela—limit refugee admissions, and strip legal protections from over half a million migrants residing in the U.S.

The order to end birthright citizenship sparked immediate legal backlash. Twenty-two states and numerous immigrant advocacy organizations filed lawsuits, arguing that the move conflicts with the U.S. Constitution and previous rulings from the courts.

Central to the argument is the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified after the Civil War. This amendment established citizenship rights for formerly enslaved individuals and stated that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are citizens. This clause was designed to overrule the Supreme Court’s infamous Dred Scott v. Sandford decision, which had denied Black Americans the right to citizenship.

Trump and his supporters contend that the children of undocumented immigrants and temporary visitors are not truly “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States because their parents lack legal status. Based on this interpretation, they believe these children do not qualify for automatic citizenship.

However, this view is strongly opposed by most constitutional experts, legal scholars, and immigration advocates. They argue that Trump’s interpretation would require a dramatic re-reading of the 14th Amendment and goes against long-standing legal precedent. In particular, they point to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which upheld that a child born in the United States to immigrant parents—who were not citizens—was nonetheless an American citizen. Wong Kim Ark was born in San Francisco to parents who were subjects of the Chinese Emperor, yet the court affirmed his citizenship under the 14th Amendment.

This precedent forms a central pillar in the opposition’s legal challenge. Critics argue that excluding certain children born in the U.S. from citizenship sets a dangerous precedent and opens the door to broader exclusions based on ancestry or parentage.

The high court’s latest decision does not determine whether Trump’s executive order will ultimately stand. Instead, it allows the policy to be more easily implemented by lifting the universal injunctions that had previously blocked it across the country. This procedural win makes it harder for opponents to prevent enforcement of the order while they continue their legal fight.

Moving forward, the legal battle over birthright citizenship is likely to return to the lower courts, where judges will weigh constitutional arguments in greater detail. Given the Supreme Court’s reluctance to address the constitutional question directly in this instance, it remains to be seen how and when the justices might eventually rule on the core issue of whether children born on U.S. soil to undocumented parents can be denied citizenship.

For now, Trump and his supporters have scored a procedural victory that may allow the policy to take effect in parts of the country—unless lower courts find other grounds to block it. However, the controversy is far from over, and with lawsuits continuing to unfold across multiple jurisdictions, the future of birthright citizenship in America remains uncertain.

House Votes to Deport Noncitizens Convicted of Driving Drunk

Ajay GhoshImmigration, USA 0

The House on Friday passed legislation to deport noncitizens convicted of drunken driving, reported Breitbart.

The legislation, the Jeremy and Angel Seay and Sergeant Brandon Mendoza Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act, was introduced by Rep. Barry Moore, R-Ala., in honor of a couple from his district who were killed by a migrant drunken driver while they were riding a motorcycle.

“Their lives were cut short by the senseless act,” Moore told the Alabama Daily News. “Tragedies like this are not uncommon across this country.”

Republicans overwhelmingly supported the bill, while 160 Democrats opposed the measure.

Proposed 3.5% Remittance Tax Alarms Indian Diaspora Over Financial and Privacy Concerns

Staff ReporterEconomy, Immigration 0

Ajay, an Indian American engineer, has lived in the United States for over 35 years. His elderly mother, aged 90, continues to reside in Mumbai, India, where she is looked after by a nurse and domestic help. Though she used to visit Ajay, declining health and the need for constant care led her to stay in India permanently. For Ajay, this has brought emotional strain as well as logistical and financial burdens, as he juggles the responsibilities of long-distance caregiving.

Like many others in the Indian diaspora, Ajay sends money monthly to support his mother’s needs, including salaries for her caregivers. He uses platforms like Remitly for these transactions. However, a newly proposed remittance tax in the U.S. may complicate this simple act. The looming legislation could soon impact how immigrants like Ajay manage cross-border financial responsibilities.

Hidden within the sweeping legislative proposal titled the “One Big Beautiful” bill is a provision that threatens to reshape the landscape for foreign remittances. It calls for a 3.5% tax on money sent abroad by foreign workers, including those holding green cards and temporary work visas such as the H-1B. For a country like India—which leads the world in remittance receipts—this could trigger serious financial and social repercussions.

Though U.S. citizens such as Ajay are officially exempt from the proposed tax, there’s a caveat. They will still be required to verify their citizenship status every time they send money, a new bureaucratic hurdle in what has traditionally been a routine transaction. More worryingly, this added requirement may open the door to privacy breaches and fraudulent schemes.

During a June 6 briefing hosted by American Community Media titled Taxing Remittances—A New Front in War on Immigrants, experts expressed concern about the tax’s wide-ranging effects. They emphasized that in many lower-income nations, remittances account for up to 30% of GDP. Advocates highlighted the regressive nature of this tax, calling it a form of double taxation. “Millions of undocumented immigrants already pay income taxes,” they noted. Imposing another layer of taxation may prompt people to explore risky, informal channels for sending money home.

India’s economy relies heavily on remittance flows. According to the Migration Policy Institute, many of the 2.9 million Indian immigrants living in the U.S. regularly transfer money to support families, fund businesses, or repay student loans. The Reserve Bank of India reports that India’s remittances rose from $55.6 billion in 2010-11 to $118.7 billion in 2023-24, helping to offset half the country’s goods trade deficit and even exceeding foreign direct investment levels.

India has topped the global remittance chart since 2008. The World Bank places India’s share at 14% of worldwide remittance inflows in 2024, up from 11% in 2001. Projections from the Reserve Bank of India suggest that remittances may reach $160 billion by 2029. Historically, these inflows have made up about 3% of India’s GDP. A BBC report further states that remittances in India serve multiple roles: from covering basic household expenses to investing in property, gold, or small businesses, according to the Centre for WTO Studies in Delhi.

A reduction in remittance flows could result in less saving and reduced investment activity. Families might be forced to scale down future-oriented spending and prioritize essentials like healthcare, food, and education instead.

The “One Big Beautiful Bill,” introduced by Republicans, is a wide-ranging legislative proposal that tackles tax reforms, spending limits, and border security. Nestled within its more than 1,000 pages is the 3.5% remittance tax clause.

Ariel Ruiz Soto, Senior Policy Analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, explained during the ACom briefing, “One is trying to use this as a method of collecting money to subsidize or to cover the deficit for the bill that they’re advancing.” But he raised a more pressing concern: “The mandate on non-US citizens means that the administration will be able to collect citizenship data, or legal status information of those immigrants.” Soto added, “Remittance agencies like Xoom or Remitly, or Western Union are going to carry the burden of trying to ask who is an immigrant, or what their immigration status will be.”

This administrative overhaul carries significant risks. Money transfer firms, including banks, cryptocurrency platforms, and non-banking financial institutions, will have to register with the U.S. Treasury and build systems capable of verifying both citizenship and tax status. Dr. Manuel Orozco, a senior advisor for the International Fund for Agricultural Development, issued a stern warning: “There is not a single private entity that is authorized to collect information about your citizenship status.”

Dr. Orozco further noted that cybercriminals could exploit this new system to obtain sensitive information like citizenship and tax identification. “No one carries that stuff around,” he said, referring to documents like passports and naturalization certificates. “How will a bank confirm a money transfer is performed by a U.S. citizen?”

The prospect of rising costs and increased surveillance could also drive some immigrants toward illegal or informal money transfer systems. Ajay commented, “Hawala is an illegal way to transfer money that gives rise to unnecessary fraud.” The Hawala network operates on informal trust-based systems and is especially popular in South Asia. While it does not involve actual cross-border money movement, its reliance on off-the-books ledgers makes it illegal in the United States under anti-money laundering regulations.

India Currents also contacted the Financial Technology Association (FTA), which joined six other trade groups in a letter to Senators Mike Crapo and Ron Wyden, urging them to exclude the remittance tax and verification requirement from the reconciliation bill. The FTA warned of a “significant invasion of privacy” that would negatively affect everyday Americans, including military families and students abroad.

Penny Lee, President and CEO of the FTA, emphasized, “We should not be asking everyday Americans to hand over their sensitive personal information or pay a tax to send money to families serving overseas or studying abroad.” She added, “This proposal not only infringes on Americans’ civil liberties, but also makes it harder to combat transnational crime by pushing cross-border payments into unregulated channels.”

As of now, the bill remains in reconciliation, its fate undecided.

Helen Dempster of the Center for Global Development warned the new tax could result in a 5.6% decrease in remittance flows. While Mexico would suffer the highest absolute losses—more than $2.6 billion annually—countries like India, China, and Vietnam would also be hit hard. This would lead to diminished household income and a weakened demand environment in countries where remittances are a major part of the Gross National Income.

Dempster also noted that reductions in U.S. foreign aid could force migrants to increase remittances, further straining their finances. “For many low- and middle-income countries who rely on both aid and remittances, these two cuts coming from the administration are going to deal a double blow to the world’s poorest people,” she said.

In the U.S., the Latino community is also expressing deep concerns. Ana Valdez, President and CEO of The Latino Donor Collaborative, said, “Taxing the remittances won’t stop the money from leaving.” She cited testimonials such as, “my mom is gonna get her $1,000 every month, whatever it takes,” and “if I have to stop going to the movie theater, if I have to stop buying clothes, if I have to reduce my expenses in terms of other outings or hobbies, I will.”

Valdez highlighted that the Latino community wields a purchasing power of nearly $4 trillion. She warned that taxing their remittances would ripple through the broader economy. “People are sending money that has already been taxed,” she concluded. “This is a penalty on the American dream, because immigrants are the American dream.”

Dr. Suresh U Kumar Honored with Prestigious Lifetime Achievement Award for Immigrant Entrepreneurship

Staff ReporterImmigration, Profile 0

At a recent ceremony hosted at Pines Manor in Edison, New Jersey, Dr. Suresh U Kumar, the President of The Indus Entrepreneurs (TiE) New Jersey, received the esteemed 2025 Dieter Weissenrieder Lifetime Achievement Award. This recognition was conferred by the New Jersey Business Immigration Coalition, celebrating Dr. Kumar’s remarkable journey as an immigrant and his enduring contributions across multiple fields, including business, entrepreneurship, education, and social leadership.

The 2025 Dieter Weissenrieder Lifetime Achievement Award is presented to individuals whose accomplishments span an entire professional career, highlighting exceptional achievements in business and entrepreneurship, along with a sustained, meaningful impact on society. For Dr. Kumar, the award serves not just as a personal honor, but as a broader recognition of the value immigrant entrepreneurs add to American society.

While accepting the award, Dr. Kumar shared a heartfelt message that touched on his personal and professional identity as well as the societal challenges faced by immigrants today. “The two words that make the 2025 Dieter Weissenrieder Lifetime Achievement Award special for me are ‘Immigrant Entrepreneur’ because these words best define me—next only the most important affiliation that I share with many of you—that of an American Citizen,” he remarked. He went on to say, “Today, when immigrants are unfairly targeted, vilified, and maligned by people in positions of power, I proudly embrace my identity as an American Immigrant Entrepreneur.”

Dr. Kumar’s journey is both inspiring and multifaceted. Originally from Kochi, India, he began his leadership journey as a student political leader before making a significant life transition by moving to the United States in 1991. That move marked the beginning of a global career that would span decades and encompass numerous achievements. His entrepreneurial spirit came to the forefront in 1999 when he co-founded his first venture. This milestone sparked a lifelong pursuit of leadership, innovation, and transformative business development.

Over the years, Dr. Kumar has become known as a serial entrepreneur and educator with a commitment to nurturing future leaders. His work as a professor and Director of Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the New Jersey Institute of Technology places him at the intersection of academia and enterprise, where he continues to guide aspiring innovators and shape the next generation of entrepreneurs.

In addition to his academic and business credentials, Dr. Kumar is also an author and active community leader. He currently serves as the founder of The New Frontier Firm, an AI-focused startup that aligns with his forward-thinking mindset and dedication to cutting-edge technologies. His leadership extends into the nonprofit space through his role as President and Board Member of TiE New Jersey, a chapter of the globally respected Indus Entrepreneurs organization that supports and mentors South Asian business professionals and start-ups.

A true renaissance man, Dr. Kumar has also explored the literary world. His debut novel, The Girl in Scarlet Hijab, was published by Rupa Publications and has garnered critical acclaim. The book has been shortlisted for the 2025 Delhi Literature Festival Jury Award for Fiction, adding yet another layer to his diverse and impactful career. Through his writing, he extends his influence beyond the boardroom and classroom, contributing to the cultural and intellectual life of the broader community.

The Dieter Weissenrieder Award underscores the values Dr. Kumar has stood for throughout his career—integrity, innovation, and a deep commitment to both personal and societal betterment. His leadership style reflects a blend of strategic insight, academic discipline, and entrepreneurial vision. He has been instrumental in fostering environments that promote innovation and inclusion, particularly among immigrants who seek to carve out meaningful roles within the American economy.

Dr. Kumar’s story is also emblematic of the broader immigrant experience in the United States—one filled with challenges, perseverance, and ultimate triumph. By embracing the identity of an immigrant entrepreneur and using his platform to advocate for fairness and opportunity, he offers a counter-narrative to the often negative rhetoric surrounding immigration. His career stands as a testament to the powerful role immigrants play in driving progress, creating jobs, and enriching the social and cultural fabric of the nation.

Throughout his career, Dr. Kumar has worn many hats—professor, innovator, mentor, leader, and author—but at the core of each role is a consistent mission: to uplift others while staying grounded in the values of equity, opportunity, and community service. His leadership in TiE New Jersey, in particular, reflects his commitment to empowering fellow entrepreneurs, offering mentorship, networking opportunities, and the tools necessary to succeed in a competitive marketplace.

His influence extends not only across different sectors but also across borders, reflecting his global mindset and Indian-American identity. From his roots in Kochi to his current roles in New Jersey, he has bridged cultures and disciplines, making lasting contributions wherever he goes.

The recognition by the New Jersey Business Immigration Coalition thus serves not only as a personal milestone but also as a symbol of what immigrant leadership can look like at its best. It is a reminder that behind every success story is a tapestry of perseverance, community support, and the courage to innovate.

By receiving the 2025 Dieter Weissenrieder Lifetime Achievement Award, Dr. Suresh U Kumar joins a select group of leaders whose work exemplifies the transformative power of entrepreneurship driven by immigrant ambition and vision. His legacy is already influencing future generations who see in him a role model for what can be achieved when talent, determination, and purpose align.

As he stood on stage to accept the honor, Dr. Kumar’s words captured the spirit of his journey and the broader immigrant narrative in America. “I proudly embrace my identity as an American Immigrant Entrepreneur,” he said, reinforcing the notion that diversity, inclusion, and innovation are not just ideals but necessary foundations for the future.

Dr. Kumar’s accomplishments span more than just career milestones—they encompass the full spectrum of what it means to be a change-maker in society. Whether through education, entrepreneurship, literature, or civic engagement, he continues to leave an indelible mark on every sphere he touches. His recognition is well-earned, and his story serves as an inspiration not only to immigrants but to all who strive to make a meaningful difference.

US Tightens Social Media Rules for Indian Students and Exchange Visa Applicants

Staff ReporterImmigration, Social Media 0

In a significant shift in visa application requirements, the United States embassy in India has announced a new directive for individuals applying for student and exchange visitor visas. Effective immediately, all applicants for F, M, and J category non-immigrant visas must set their social media accounts to public. This measure is intended to assist U.S. officials in verifying the identities and eligibility of applicants during the standard security screening procedures.

The embassy announced the update on X (formerly Twitter), highlighting the need for enhanced transparency in the digital activities of visa aspirants. The embassy’s message stated, “Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J nonimmigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media accounts to public to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States under U.S. law.”

The latest policy applies to three major categories of U.S. non-immigrant visas. The F visa is designated for academic students who intend to pursue full-time education in the United States, typically at colleges, universities, or other academic institutions. The M visa is tailored for vocational or non-academic students, such as those enrolling in technical or trade programs. The J visa, meanwhile, is used by exchange visitors who may include researchers, scholars, professors, interns, and participants in cultural or educational exchange initiatives.

This new rule means that Indian students and others aspiring to study or participate in exchange programs in the United States must now ensure that their social media profiles are publicly viewable. The requirement comes on top of the existing policy in which applicants are required to disclose their social media handles when submitting their visa forms. While listing social media accounts was already part of the vetting process, the recent change intensifies this measure by demanding complete visibility of the content shared on these platforms.

This adjustment is framed as a security step rather than a bureaucratic hurdle. According to the embassy, the goal is to “facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility.” This suggests that social media activity is being used as an additional layer to verify personal claims made by visa applicants, detect inconsistencies, or identify any red flags that could potentially affect U.S. national security or public safety.

However, while this change has been clearly communicated, U.S. authorities have not elaborated on how long applicants must keep their social media accounts public. The duration for which the visibility must be maintained remains unspecified. This lack of clarity may leave applicants uncertain about when it would be safe to revert their accounts back to private settings after completing their visa applications.

Although officials have not disclosed the criteria they will use while evaluating the applicants’ social media profiles, this move reflects a broader global trend in which governments are increasingly scrutinizing individuals’ digital footprints as part of security and immigration procedures. It also signifies the growing importance of online behavior in decisions related to international mobility.

The requirement could prompt a variety of responses among applicants. Some might express concerns about the potential invasion of privacy, especially since personal profiles often contain information not directly relevant to the purpose of a visa. Others may worry that their posts, even if innocuous, might be misinterpreted or taken out of context, thereby impacting their chances of obtaining a visa. These concerns underscore the rising tension between security protocols and individual privacy rights in the digital age.

This policy change might also influence the way prospective students and exchange visitors manage their online presence. Applicants may now feel compelled to cleanse their profiles of any content that could be viewed unfavorably, even if it is harmless or unrelated to their intentions in the United States. This could result in a broader culture of self-censorship among international students and travelers who are eager to meet the new standards and avoid jeopardizing their visa eligibility.

The new guideline places greater emphasis on digital transparency. Given the high volume of Indian students applying for U.S. visas each year, the impact of this policy is likely to be widely felt. In recent years, the United States has remained a top destination for Indian students pursuing higher education, with tens of thousands of students traveling annually to American institutions for undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees. The same applies to researchers and other exchange participants who contribute to academic and cultural exchange between the two nations.

While the embassy has not introduced any penalties for non-compliance, it is implied that failing to adjust one’s privacy settings may delay or jeopardize the visa process. By aligning social media visibility with admissibility criteria, the U.S. visa vetting process now places a new spotlight on applicants’ digital lives, making it increasingly important for prospective students and visitors to ensure their online behavior reflects their intentions accurately and responsibly.

This development represents the latest in a series of policy measures aimed at tightening the vetting process for U.S. visa applicants. While the primary goal remains national security, the method used—requiring open social media access—marks a shift in how identities and risks are assessed in the modern digital context.

As global connectivity and digital footprints become more integral to individual identities, embassies and immigration offices are adapting their procedures accordingly. The U.S. embassy’s new rule underscores how personal online activities are now viewed as extensions of an applicant’s real-world conduct, especially when national security considerations are involved.

Although this step may add a layer of concern for many Indian applicants, especially regarding privacy and judgment criteria, it is clear that the embassy views this move as a necessary evolution in safeguarding U.S. interests. The measure may also reflect the broader geopolitical atmosphere, in which digital transparency is gaining precedence over traditional forms of documentation and interviews.

In summary, the United States has introduced a new and stricter guideline for Indian applicants of F, M, and J visas, requiring them to make their social media profiles publicly accessible. The intent is to help officials confirm the identity and suitability of applicants under U.S. law. The U.S. embassy noted in its post, “Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J nonimmigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media accounts to public.” This reflects a growing emphasis on digital scrutiny in visa processing, signaling an era where online behavior becomes as vital as formal documentation in determining international mobility.

Canada Opens New Doors for Skilled Workers Without Job Offers Starting July 2025

Staff ReporterCommunity, Immigration 0

Canada continues to reinforce its position as one of the world’s most open and welcoming destinations for international workers. Beginning in July 2025, the process for skilled individuals to work in the country becomes even more streamlined—with new avenues available that do not require a job offer. For those aspiring to start a new chapter in Canada but haven’t yet landed a position, these revised pathways may present the ideal opportunity to make that goal a reality.

This article explores the various work permit options and immigration programs now accessible in Canada, which allow foreign nationals to live and work in the country without first securing employment.

One of the most accommodating options available is the Open Work Permit, a permit that allows foreign nationals to work for nearly any employer in Canada. Unlike many traditional work permits, this version doesn’t demand a pre-arranged job, offering flexibility that appeals to many newcomers trying to establish themselves.

The Open Work Permit is commonly granted to specific categories of applicants, including spouses or common-law partners of skilled workers, spouses of international students, and international students who qualify for a Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP). Refugees and certain individuals holding temporary resident permits may also be eligible. However, there are restrictions—holders of this permit cannot work for employers found guilty of violating labour standards or those listed as ineligible by the Canadian government.

Another accessible route for working in Canada without a job offer is through the PGWP. This is designed for international students who graduate from designated learning institutions in Canada. If eligible, students can receive a work permit that allows them to remain in the country and gain employment for up to three years, depending on the duration of their study program.

This post-graduation permit offers several major benefits. First, it requires no job offer for application, providing graduates the freedom to seek work across various sectors and employers. Secondly, the PGWP gives students the opportunity to accumulate valuable Canadian work experience, which plays a crucial role in strengthening permanent residency applications.You don’t need a job offer to apply. You can work for any employer, in any field. It helps build Canadian work experience, which is useful for permanent residency applications.

The International Mobility Program (IMP) is another avenue that permits individuals to work in Canada without undergoing the Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) process or securing a job offer, in certain circumstances. The IMP supports individuals who meet specific criteria, such as those covered under international trade agreements like the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), formerly known as NAFTA, or those participating in reciprocal employment arrangements.

Additionally, individuals entering Canada for reasons deemed to provide significant social, cultural, or economic benefit may qualify under this program. The nature of IMP work permits varies, but many of them are open permits or exempt from LMIA requirements, which significantly broadens access for those lacking a concrete job offer.Unlike employer-specific work permits, many IMP work permits are either open or exempt from LMIA requirements, making them more accessible for people who don’t have a job secured.

A further route involves applying for a Spousal Open Work Permit. This is available to individuals whose spouses or common-law partners are already residing in Canada under a valid work or study permit. It allows the partner to work for any Canadian employer without needing prior employment confirmation. A crucial advantage of this permit is that its validity is directly linked to the status of the principal applicant—the spouse or partner. As long as the primary permit holder remains in good standing, the accompanying spouse’s permit remains active as well.

“The key benefit here is that the validity of your permit is usually tied to your spouse’s status. So as long as they remain in good standing, your work permit remains valid too,” the article explains, highlighting the mutual stability such an arrangement offers to couples looking to build a life in Canada together.

Entrepreneurs also have an exciting avenue to consider in the form of Canada’s Start-up Visa Program. This option provides both a pathway to permanent residency and the chance to build a business in Canada, all without requiring a traditional job offer. Instead of seeking employment from an existing company, applicants must pitch their business idea to a designated Canadian organization—such as a business incubator, angel investor group, or venture capital fund.

To qualify, entrepreneurs must secure a letter of support from the designated organization, and they also need to meet minimum financial and language proficiency benchmarks. Once these conditions are fulfilled, they can proceed to apply for permanent residency and obtain a work permit to begin building their business in Canada.

This approach is particularly attractive for innovators and self-starters who may not fit into standard employment channels but have the skills and vision to contribute to the Canadian economy through new enterprises. Instead of traditional employment, you’ll need to pitch your business idea to a designated organization. Once accepted, you can apply for permanent residency and receive a work permit to start developing your business in Canada.

The latest updates to Canadian work and immigration policies reflect a significant shift towards inclusivity and accessibility. By offering multiple paths for skilled individuals to contribute to the country without needing pre-existing employment, Canada is strengthening its appeal as a destination for talent worldwide.

Summary Table

Pathway Requires Job Offer? Type of Work Permit Notable Features
Open Work Permit No Open Flexible, work for almost any employer
Post-Graduation Work Permit No Open For graduates of Canadian institutions
International Mobility Program Sometimes No Varies (often open) Includes agreements and exemptions
Spousal Work Permit No Open Tied to partner’s status in Canada
Start-up Visa Program No Employer not required Requires business support, PR pathway

 

Three H-1B Indian Workers Denied US Entry for Overstaying in India

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

Three Indian professionals holding H-1B visas have been denied entry into the United States and had their visas revoked by US authorities after staying in India longer than permitted. All three were found to have exceeded the allowed duration of stay outside the US, with one individual away for nearly three months and the others for even longer. Despite presenting documentation that justified their prolonged absence and letters of support from their employers, they were still denied entry and asked to return to India.

One of the individuals involved shared details of the incident in a message that has since gained traction on social media.

The message, circulating widely with the title “H-1B visas cancelled in Abu Dhabi,” opens with a revealing account of the ordeal: “We had a particularly tough situation in US immigration in Abu Dhabi.” The sender explained that “authorities revoked H-1B visa and denied port entry for three candidates, including me, for staying in India for more than two months.”

This situation unfolded at the Abu Dhabi International Airport, which hosts a US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Preclearance facility. This preclearance service allows travelers to complete US immigration and customs inspections before even boarding their flight to the United States. It is one of the few locations outside of North America that provides this service, effectively turning it into a US border checkpoint.

Even though the affected individuals had documentation in hand to explain their stay in India, including proof of emergencies and employer-approved leave, their explanations were not enough to sway immigration officers. The worker stated, “Even after showing all the proof of emergency and approval emails from the company, the CBP still revoked their visas.”

He went on to explain that the visa was canceled under a specific provision: “Attorney denied entry and put a cancelled seal on visa with reason pursuant to 41.122(h)(3) seal and sent us back to India.” The message also provided an important caution for others on H-1B visas, emphasizing the importance of not staying out of the US for too long. “The maximum permissible stay outside the US is 60 days for H-1B holders with what he called a valid reason,” the message noted, adding that it’s much safer to limit foreign travel to between 30 and 40 days to avoid unnecessary complications with reentry.

To better understand the implications of such an action, it is helpful to look at the function and rules surrounding the H-1B visa. The H-1B is a non-immigrant visa issued by the United States to allow employers to bring in skilled foreign workers temporarily. These workers are generally employed in specialized fields such as information technology, engineering, medicine, and business. For a foreign worker to obtain this visa, their employer must sponsor them by filing a Labor Condition Application (LCA) with the US Department of Labor and then petitioning the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for approval.

The H-1B visa typically permits the worker to reside in the US for up to six years. However, employers can request extensions by filing Form I-129, a petition requesting the US government to continue the worker’s stay. Despite these options, being away from the US for extended periods without a proper reason or without continuous employment can be viewed by immigration authorities as a violation of visa terms.

Reactions to this incident were swift and emotional on social media, especially on the platform Threads, where a page named “nris_adda” highlighted the story with the caption, “Very sorry to hear this.” The post drew a range of responses from users, revealing divided opinions about who was at fault and what lessons others should draw from the incident.

One user expressed both sympathy and a practical takeaway: “Sadly, the worst experiences you will have are at the Canadian borders and the pre-Clearance facilities (Shannon, Abu Dhabi). Best to avoid those ports. Of course, the officers acted lawfully but failed to see the extenuating circumstances. Very sad.”

However, not all comments were empathetic. Another user took a more critical stance: “There is no need to be in India for 3 months if you are working in the USA.” This comment underlined the notion that extended stays outside the US might naturally raise red flags with immigration officers, regardless of personal circumstances.

A more judgmental comment pointed to a broader cultural observation: “Indians have a tendency to break rules and cry when there are repercussions. Visa is a privilege, not a right. If it clearly states you cannot stay for over 60 days, why do it and then fuss when denied entry?”

Another user echoed this sentiment, laying blame squarely on the visa holders themselves: “Ignorance is not an excuse. They have to blame only their carelessness.”

This case underscores a critical lesson for H-1B visa holders: awareness of and strict adherence to immigration guidelines is crucial. Even with the right paperwork and employer support, decisions at ports of entry rest with US immigration officers, who have broad discretion to revoke visas if they believe terms have been violated.

While the CBP acted within its legal boundaries, the lack of flexibility shown in a case involving emergency leave has sparked debate about the balance between enforcement and empathy. Still, as the experience of these three Indian workers demonstrates, the burden of proof lies heavily with the traveler, and even that may not always suffice.

The incident serves as a stark reminder of how vulnerable non-immigrant visa holders can be to sudden changes in their immigration status due to procedural misunderstandings or misinterpretations. For those relying on H-1B status to live and work in the US, maintaining continuous compliance with visa rules—even during trips abroad—is essential.

In conclusion, the revocation of H-1B visas for these three individuals reveals the strict scrutiny applied at US preclearance locations, especially when travelers are returning from extended stays outside the country. Their case highlights the need for both caution and awareness when navigating the complex landscape of US immigration, particularly under a non-immigrant visa.

H-1B Techie’s Green Card Dreams Derailed by Suspected Fake Job Applicants

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

An H-1B visa holder working in the United States was recently hit with an unexpected and troubling setback from his employer—one that had nothing to do with his performance or qualifications, but rather with a suspicious surge of job applications. This tech professional, who shared his story online, is currently in his second year of employment as an Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Engineer at a financial technology firm. His journey toward permanent residency in the U.S. was progressing until it was suddenly halted under questionable circumstances.

The company had initially planned to sponsor his green card under the “Data Scientist II” role—the same designation under which he was hired back in 2022. Everything seemed to be on track until earlier this month when the company’s immigration team suddenly decided to pause the PERM labor market process. The reason? They had received over 400 applications for the job opening posted as part of the labor certification requirement. Surprisingly, not a single interview was conducted before this abrupt decision was made.

According to the employee, the company feared that the sheer volume of applications could potentially trigger an audit by the U.S. Department of Labor. Such audits are often lengthy and complex, and companies typically prefer to avoid them due to the bureaucratic complications they entail. The techie also acknowledged a flaw in the process, admitting that the job description provided for the PERM process was vague and didn’t accurately represent the kind of work he actually performs.

In the time since the original PERM application process began, the H-1B worker has even received a promotion. He now holds the position of AI/ML Engineer III. With this new role, his employer has opted to restart the green card process from scratch, which includes preparing a new job posting and going through the labor market testing phase again.

But what’s more alarming about this entire episode is what it reveals about an emerging and disturbing trend. The unusually high number of applications received for the Data Scientist II role may not be entirely genuine. In fact, another user on social media highlighted the presence of an account on the platform X (formerly Twitter) that has been actively urging individuals to flood PERM job postings with applications. The account even boasted about the outcome of the exact scenario that this tech worker experienced, sharing celebratory posts whenever companies were forced to pull back from the green card sponsorship process due to overwhelming applicant numbers.

There appears to be a coordinated effort among some individuals online to disrupt the green card processes of H-1B visa holders by artificially inflating the number of applicants for labor certification jobs. Some of these users are openly admitting that they are applying for positions under the PERM process for which they are not remotely qualified. Their objective is not to secure the job, but to sabotage the path to permanent residency for foreign workers.

“This is weaponizing a system that is already skewed against immigrants,” one observer noted. U.S. citizens who participate in these tactics face no legal repercussions. They are allowed to apply for any job, even if they do not meet the qualifications or do not intend to accept the position if offered. As a result, the real cost is borne by the H-1B visa holders, who are already navigating a complex and uncertain immigration landscape.

For many foreign workers, the PERM process is an essential step toward obtaining a green card, which in turn provides a sense of security and stability in the U.S. However, the system requires the sponsoring employer to demonstrate that there are no qualified U.S. workers willing and available to take the job. This is typically done by advertising the job and allowing a window of time for applicants to respond. If qualified U.S. workers do apply, or if the volume of responses is unusually high, the process may be paused or even abandoned entirely, as companies fear scrutiny or delays from federal audits.

In this particular case, the flood of over 400 job applications—none of which resulted in interviews—has raised serious questions about the legitimacy of those applications. The affected H-1B techie, who had followed all the legal and professional steps to advance his career and permanent residency in the U.S., finds himself back at square one.

The employer’s decision to pause the PERM process and start anew might appear as a procedural reset, but it represents a significant emotional and professional setback for the worker. Not only does it delay his green card timeline, but it also places his future in the U.S. in jeopardy, especially given the limited duration of H-1B visas and the uncertainty involved in annual renewals.

This growing trend of sabotaging PERM listings could have far-reaching implications for the broader immigrant community in the U.S. It exposes a vulnerability in the labor certification system—one that can be exploited without consequence to deliberately derail the aspirations of skilled foreign workers.

The techie’s story highlights how a system designed to balance opportunities for domestic workers and foreign talent can be manipulated to serve exclusionary agendas. While immigration processes have always been subject to regulatory checks, this new wave of deliberate disruption is unprecedented in its scale and intent.

As the techie’s experience circulates online, it has sparked broader conversations about the fairness and resilience of the current immigration system. Supporters of H-1B workers argue that reform is urgently needed—not only to streamline the green card process but also to safeguard it from bad-faith actors who misuse the system for political or personal motives.

In the meantime, individuals like the AI/ML engineer at the center of this story are left to pick up the pieces and start over. Despite his qualifications, promotion, and proven contributions to his employer, he now faces yet another uphill battle to secure his place in a country he has already begun to call home.

There is little legal recourse for H-1B workers in such scenarios. The immigration system allows domestic applicants to flood listings without accountability, while foreign workers face strict scrutiny at every stage. In essence, those looking to derail green card sponsorships can do so freely, but the consequences fall squarely on the shoulders of the immigrants affected.

As one observer succinctly put it, “There is no legal trouble for anyone who is applying for these jobs. But for an H-1B techie chasing a secure future in the US, he pays a heavy price.”

U.S. Tightens Scrutiny on Student Visa Applicants’ Online Presence Amid Broader Immigration Clampdown

Staff ReporterImmigration, Social Media 0

U.S. diplomats have now been officially instructed to examine the social media and digital activity of all foreign nationals applying for student and other educational visas, according to a State Department cable dated Wednesday and obtained by POLITICO. The move represents a significant tightening of visa screening protocols under the Trump administration.

According to the cable, consular officers must now investigate applicants’ digital footprint for “any indications of hostility towards the citizens, culture, government, institutions or founding principles of the United States.” This directive is part of a broader effort to enhance national security and prevent entry of individuals perceived as threats. The cable further mandates that embassies identify and flag any “advocacy for, aid or support for foreign terrorists and other threats to U.S. national security” along with “support for unlawful antisemitic harassment or violence.”

A notable example provided in the document is explicit support for Hamas, the Palestinian militant organization. The inclusion of such a specific reference underscores the administration’s increased concern about extremism and anti-American sentiment potentially entering U.S. borders through educational visa channels.

This initiative appears to be another strategic move by the Trump administration to penalize American academic institutions, particularly those criticized for their handling of pro-Palestinian demonstrations on campuses. The administration has often accused elite colleges and universities of harboring both antisemitic ideologies and liberal political leanings. This directive also aligns with a broader push to curb legal immigration, which complements the administration’s ongoing efforts to address undocumented immigration domestically.

The cable instructs consular officers to pay particular attention to “applicants who demonstrate a history of political activism,” with an emphasis on determining whether such individuals are likely to continue their activism while in the United States. This applies not only to first-time student visa applicants but also to returning students seeking visa renewals.

Consular officials are told to create “detailed case notes” of their digital investigations and to “take screenshots to preserve the record against possible later alteration or loss of the information.” This instruction implies a need for robust documentation, potentially for use in future reviews or appeals, should questions about an individual’s intentions arise later.

The cable makes clear that the scope of “online presence” extends beyond basic social media activity. It includes data found in online databases such as LexisNexis, signaling a comprehensive approach to digital background checks. By expanding the definition, the administration appears intent on capturing a wide spectrum of information, potentially revealing ideological affiliations or troubling past behavior.

Importantly, none of the online indicators outlined in the cable would in themselves automatically disqualify an applicant from receiving a visa under current U.S. immigration law. However, the discovery of such content is meant to prompt further evaluation by consular officers. The goal is to assess whether the applicant is likely to follow U.S. laws and “engage only in activities consistent with his nonimmigrant visa status.”

While The Free Press first reported the existence of the cable, its acquisition by POLITICO sheds additional light on the evolving direction of U.S. immigration policy under the Trump administration, particularly as it relates to students and educational exchanges.

Earlier, in May, POLITICO reported that the State Department was considering expanding its social media screening procedures, which had already applied to a subset of student visa applicants, to include all applicants. That same month, the department had instructed its embassies to suspend scheduling new interviews for student visa applicants. These pauses appeared to be in preparation for the implementation of more intensive screening methods.

Subsequently, by the end of May, the State Department initiated a targeted screening pilot program for applicants planning to study, teach, or participate in educational programs at Harvard University. That cable, which laid the foundation for the broader screening strategy, did not specify what kinds of online content might be viewed as problematic or “derogatory.” Nonetheless, it marked the beginning of a new phase of digital vetting for educational visa seekers.

The latest cable, issued on Wednesday, now permits embassies to resume scheduling student visa interviews. However, it emphasizes that interviews must be conducted in a manner that acknowledges the increased workload resulting from the new vetting requirements. As part of these instructions, the State Department advised embassies to prioritize certain categories of visa applicants.

Embassies are urged to give priority to physicians applying for the “J-1” visa, which is typically used for educational exchange programs. Additionally, students planning to attend U.S. universities where international students make up 15 percent or less of the overall student body should also be prioritized for visa interviews. This criterion suggests an intent to encourage diversity in institutions where international representation is relatively low.

The directive highlights the Trump administration’s intensifying focus on using immigration tools to advance broader political objectives. By linking visa approvals to political and ideological content found online, the administration seems determined to ensure that those entering the U.S. on educational grounds do not bring views deemed incompatible with American values or national security interests.

This move also comes at a politically sensitive time, with growing scrutiny over antisemitism, campus activism, and the intersection of foreign policy and domestic dissent. While critics are likely to view these measures as overreach or an attack on free speech, supporters will likely frame them as a necessary safeguard in a volatile global landscape.

In summary, the State Department has significantly broadened the mandate for vetting foreign student visa applicants by including detailed scrutiny of their online activity. The new policy calls for extensive documentation, prioritization of certain visa categories, and careful evaluation of political and ideological signals in digital spaces. As the administration continues to reshape the nation’s immigration landscape, student visa policy has become one more arena for enforcing its vision of national security and cultural alignment.

H-1B Data Scientist Alleges Exploitation and Humiliation at US Company Amid Visa Pressures

Staff ReporterImmigration, Technology 0

A 28-year-old data scientist on an H-1B visa has come forward on social media to recount what he describes as a deeply disturbing and unfair experience at his U.S.-based company. His post has sparked conversations around how foreign workers, particularly those on temporary visas, are often subjected to workplace exploitation due to their vulnerable immigration status.

According to the data scientist, he was recruited and brought on board with the expectation of contributing to a meaningful technical project. For five months, he claims to have shouldered a bulk of the groundwork—doing the “heavy lifting” for the project, a phrase he used to indicate the foundational and difficult tasks required to set things up. However, when the time came to work on the core modelling aspect of the project—widely considered the most prestigious and intellectually rewarding phase—he was abruptly sidelined.

He alleges that the modelling work was reassigned to someone else, and in place of that, he was handed a different task that was grueling and considered undesirable by others on the team. As he described it, “Now, when it’s finally time to shine, his manager has swooped in to build the model himself.” The disappointment in his words is clear—after investing months of effort, he felt robbed of the opportunity to showcase his capabilities on the main component of the project.

But the experience, he claims, didn’t just stop at professional marginalization. The data scientist says that his manager has continued to rely on him for technical support while reserving the more visible, high-value work for himself. “His manager still expects him to continue supporting the project only with the technical aspect,” the worker pointed out. This suggests that while he is still heavily involved in the project’s mechanics, he is being systematically excluded from recognition and leadership.

To make matters worse, the young professional says that he’s become the target of what he describes as public shaming within the workplace. In his post, he recounts multiple instances of being mocked during meetings, subjected to what he calls “ridiculous questions” regarding his Python scripts, and being micromanaged to the point of humiliation. These experiences, he notes, have contributed to an increasingly toxic work environment.

He believes that these actions are part of a broader strategy to force him out of the job. “They’re trying to mentally exhaust him into quitting,” he wrote, pointing to the fact that employees on H-1B visas are under immense pressure not to lose their jobs. If an H-1B worker is terminated, they are typically given only a short grace period—currently 60 days—to find a new employer willing to sponsor their visa, or else they risk having to leave the country. In a job market that may not offer immediate opportunities, this timeline places international workers in a precarious position.

Knowing this, the data scientist says, companies can exploit international talent with minimal consequences. “Many H-1B workers also stay silent even when mistreated because losing a job could mean leaving the country. That’s the harsh reality,” he wrote. His experience sheds light on the psychological and emotional burden that accompanies visa uncertainty, particularly for younger professionals who may not have extensive networks or backup plans.

The broader implications of his story point to a systemic issue. Foreign workers, especially those in tech roles, are often brought to the U.S. with the promise of career development and stability. However, many find themselves at the mercy of employers who understand how to leverage the restrictive immigration system to their advantage. The data scientist’s ordeal also calls attention to a recurring pattern seen across various companies: assigning difficult or less desirable tasks to visa holders while reserving the strategic or leadership roles for others.

His story has resonated with many, particularly within the immigrant and tech communities. Several commenters expressed solidarity, sharing similar experiences of being overworked and under-credited. Others noted the psychological tactics sometimes used to push out employees without technically firing them—a move that would trigger visa complications and legal scrutiny.

The public nature of his complaints, however, makes his case somewhat rare. Many visa holders are reluctant to speak out, fearing retaliation or the risk of damaging future job prospects. For those on H-1B visas, being vocal can be a gamble. “Even when you’re humiliated, even when you know it’s wrong, you often stay quiet because your entire life here depends on that job,” one user responded under his post.

The tech industry has long relied on H-1B visa holders to fill roles in data science, engineering, and software development. These positions require advanced skills, and companies often justify the sponsorship of foreign workers by citing talent shortages. However, as the data scientist’s account suggests, the dependence on employer sponsorship creates an imbalance of power, making visa holders more susceptible to mistreatment.

As this case illustrates, mental exhaustion, public shaming, and exclusion from key responsibilities can serve as non-verbal signals meant to push an employee toward resignation. Such tactics are difficult to prove but are widely discussed within communities of foreign workers. The employer-employee relationship under the H-1B framework is often described as “one-sided,” with the employer holding considerable leverage due to the visa dependency.

Ultimately, the data scientist’s experience sheds light on a troubling facet of corporate culture—one that mixes performance management with immigration pressure in a way that can be deeply harmful. His decision to speak publicly, even without naming the company, is being seen as a courageous move to draw attention to an underreported issue affecting thousands of skilled professionals across the United States.

In sharing his story, the young worker has sparked a wider discussion about ethics in the workplace, accountability for managers, and the reforms needed in the H-1B system to protect those who come to the U.S. in search of opportunity but end up feeling trapped and devalued.

Global Perception of the American Dream Shifts Amid Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

Staff ReporterImmigration, USA 0

For generations, people around the world viewed the United States as a beacon of opportunity and inclusion. However, recent developments, particularly President Donald Trump’s aggressive stance on immigration, have prompted widespread reassessment of this ideal. With protests erupting across Los Angeles, on college campuses, and within religious communities, many are reconsidering the once-cherished notion of pursuing the American dream.

According to Edwin van Rest, CEO of Studyportals—a platform that monitors real-time interest from international students considering studying abroad—the current sentiment from Washington signals exclusion. “The message coming from Washington is that you are not welcome in the United States,” he said. His organization’s data shows that international interest in studying in America has dropped to its lowest point since the COVID-19 pandemic. He added, “The fact is, there are great opportunities elsewhere.”

America has long cultivated a romanticized image of itself as a land open to immigrants. While this vision remains powerful, the truth has always been more complex, with race and ethnicity playing significant roles in determining who is truly welcomed. Despite this, the allure of America has endured, powered in part by a strong economy that continues to attract millions each year. This influx has driven the population past 340 million.

Yet, signs from various industries such as tourism, education, entertainment, and trade suggest that the dream is fading for foreigners who once flocked to the U.S. for a better life. A recent Pew Research Center survey, conducted between January and April, revealed that public opinion of the U.S. declined over the past year in 15 of the 24 countries polled.

Trump and many of his followers argue that undocumented migrants pose a risk to national security, employment, and cultural identity. However, his sweeping immigration policies have also affected individuals legally present in the country, making even prospective tourists hesitant about visiting. Adding to the unease is Trump’s global trade war and his stance against international students who support pro-Palestinian causes—moves that are hard to forget among those abroad who once dreamed of participating in America’s tradition of free speech and opportunity.

An Australian Reddit user, Duncan Greaves, encapsulated this global sentiment when advising someone contemplating a U.S. vacation: “The chances of something truly horrific happening are almost certainly tiny… Basically it’s like the Dirty Harry quote: ‘Do you feel lucky?’”

Ironically, Trump himself is closely connected to immigration. Not only has he married two immigrants—Ivana Trump from what is now the Czech Republic and Melania Trump from Slovenia—but his grandfather, Friedrich Trump, was an immigrant from Germany. During a recent Oval Office meeting, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz even presented Trump with a framed copy of his grandfather’s birth certificate. Friedrich Trump had emigrated from Germany in 1885 amid war and economic hardship.

After building a fortune in the U.S. and obtaining citizenship, Friedrich Trump tried to return to Germany but was expelled for failing to fulfill military service obligations. In a letter to Luitpold, prince regent of Bavaria, he wrote, “Why should we be deported? This is very, very hard for a family. What will our fellow citizens think if honest subjects are faced with such a decree — not to mention the great material losses it would incur.”

These details reflect both the promise and the precariousness of the immigrant experience—something the Trump family has personally encountered.

Immigration has undeniably reshaped American culture and demographics. In 2024, immigration drove U.S. population growth to its highest rate in 23 years, pushing the total to over 340 million, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Nearly 2.8 million more people immigrated to the country in 2024 than in the previous year, partly due to revised methods that now include individuals admitted for humanitarian reasons. Net international migration was responsible for 84% of the nation’s 3.3 million-person increase.

In fact, immigration was the sole driver of population growth in 16 states that would have otherwise seen declines, according to the Brookings Institution.

Still, views on immigration remain deeply divided. While many Americans see it as a source of talent and labor, Trump has long regarded it as an “invasion.” Since returning to the White House, he has implemented an expansive immigration crackdown that has tested the boundaries of presidential authority. His administration has often found itself at odds with federal judges over actions that include deporting individuals, revoking visas, and transferring deportees to third countries.

Unlike during his first term, Trump has not shied away from controversial immigration policies this time around. Immigration has become his top issue in public opinion polls, solidifying his standing among Republicans and reflecting a broader change in public sentiment.

A survey conducted in June by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research showed that 46% of U.S. adults approved of Trump’s immigration policies—nearly 10 percentage points higher than his ratings on the economy or trade. Notably, the poll was conducted before protests began in Los Angeles and did not include questions about Trump’s decision to deploy military forces there.

While the United States continues to be seen as an economic superpower, its global image is shifting. Pew’s polling indicates that more people now view China as the world’s top economy. Whether Trump’s policies will lead to a tangible decline in international students and others who once looked to America for safety and opportunity remains uncertain.

Studyportals, based in the Netherlands, reported a significant drop in interest among international students. Weekly pageviews for U.S. degree programs fell by half from January 5 to the end of April. If this pattern continues, the U.S. could lose even more ground to competing nations like the United Kingdom and Australia.

“International students and their families seek predictability and security when choosing which country to trust with their future,” said Fanta Aw, CEO of NAFSA, an organization representing international educators. “The U.S. government’s recent actions have naturally shaken their confidence in the United States.”

The changing global perspective on the United States is evident. What was once seen as the ultimate destination for personal freedom and opportunity is now viewed with increasing skepticism. The American dream, while not entirely extinguished, is being reconsidered by those abroad—many of whom are now setting their sights on other nations where they feel more welcome, more secure, and more hopeful.

Sharp Drop in H-1B Visa Registrations Raises Concerns Among International Professionals

Staff ReporterImmigration 0

The number of H-1B visa cap registrations for the fiscal year 2026 has seen a significant decline, according to the latest data from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). Only 358,000 registrations were submitted this season, representing a steep 26.9% decrease compared to the previous year’s 478,000. When contrasted with fiscal year 2024, the drop is even more pronounced, with registration numbers down by more than 54%.

From these 358,000 registrations, only 120,141 have been selected to proceed further in the H-1B visa process. This visa program, which has long served as a gateway for Indian IT professionals and a vital staffing source for American tech companies, provides 85,000 visas annually. This includes a 20,000-visa allocation specifically for individuals holding US master’s degrees.

Multiple reasons are being attributed to this sharp decline. Key among them are recent changes in USCIS policies, higher application costs, and evolving career aspirations among international job seekers. A major contributing factor is the agency’s intensified efforts to clamp down on duplicate applications and system misuse.

“Based on evidence from the FY 2023 and FY 2024 H-1B cap seasons, we undertook extensive fraud investigations, denied and revoked petitions accordingly, and continue to make law enforcement referrals for criminal prosecution,” the USCIS stated in an official release on its website. The agency added that it is currently scrutinizing data from FY 2025 and FY 2026 to uncover any attempts to exploit the system through the new beneficiary-centric selection process.

The USCIS emphasized that it would take stringent measures wherever necessary. These include rejecting applications, revoking approvals, and referring cases for criminal prosecution. “We believe that the decreased filing rate for FY 2024 H-1B cap petitions and the decreased registration numbers for FY 2025 and FY 2026 indicate that these investigations, and the beneficiary-centric selection process, have been effective integrity measures,” the agency’s statement added.

Apart from regulatory crackdowns, the escalating cost of registration has emerged as another significant deterrent. This year, the USCIS increased the H-1B registration fee from a nominal $10 (around Rs 856) to a substantial $250 (approximately Rs 21,000). This dramatic rise has altered the cost-benefit equation for many applicants, especially students and young professionals.

“It’s no longer a small gamble,” commented a software developer from Nagpur who is currently residing in Washington under the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program. “When the fee was $10, people thought, why not try? But $250 is serious money, especially when you’re not guaranteed a shot. I’m still unsure if I’ll register next year—I’ve started saving up.”

Simultaneously, a noticeable change in global migration preferences is unfolding, with many potential applicants now considering destinations other than the United States. Countries such as Australia and Germany have begun to attract those seeking clearer immigration paths and more welcoming environments.

“Many of us are looking at Australia or Germany now,” said Aaftab B, a postgraduate from Hyderabad who is currently living in Chicago. “Their immigration systems are more straightforward, and you feel more welcomed there. I am also considering UAE. The US feels uncertain—long wait times for green cards, H-1B dependency, job instability. It’s just not worth the anxiety anymore.”

Experts warn that these dynamics could significantly alter international student migration trends, particularly from India, which has traditionally been one of the largest sources of foreign students in the United States.

“The ‘American Dream’ of immediate employment at a high salary with full sponsorship of an H-1B visa will elude most foreign students. It’s not the late 90s and early 2000s anymore,” said Orn Bodvarsson, an economist and senior academic. “As word continues to travel back to India that post-graduation labour market outcomes are not as strong as before, Indian student emigration to the USA will weaken.”

This transformation in perception is expected to have lasting implications. For decades, the H-1B visa has been viewed as a secure and desirable path for talented professionals, especially in the technology and engineering fields. However, the current environment—marked by tightening rules, rising costs, and growing uncertainty—appears to be reshaping that narrative.

For many potential applicants, the cost of applying has now become a calculated risk rather than a low-stakes opportunity. Where a $10 registration fee encouraged mass applications and minimal financial hesitation, the new $250 charge has forced applicants to seriously weigh the odds. Many now consider whether the stress of the uncertain outcome is worth the investment.

This sentiment is echoed across various sectors of international professionals. Even for those who have studied in the US and gained valuable experience, the long-term uncertainty about visa renewals, employment security, and green card backlogs is discouraging.

“I’ve been here for over five years,” said another Indian professional who preferred not to be named. “I went through OPT, then H-1B, and now I’m stuck in a green card backlog. The anxiety doesn’t go away. Every year, there’s some policy change, some delay. You don’t feel settled.”

In contrast, countries like Australia, Germany, and the UAE are emerging as stronger alternatives. With their more transparent immigration frameworks, faster processing times, and often more straightforward paths to permanent residency, these nations are becoming increasingly appealing to international talent that once focused solely on the US.

Analysts suggest that if this trend continues, it could have wider implications for American tech firms that have long relied on a steady influx of skilled foreign workers through the H-1B program. A decline in foreign applications may eventually force companies to adjust hiring practices, invest more in domestic training, or even shift operations to countries with more accommodating immigration policies.

Overall, the H-1B program’s future now appears to hinge on how the US adapts to these evolving challenges. While efforts to reduce fraud and misuse are understandable and necessary, they must be balanced with accessibility and clarity for genuine applicants. For now, however, the sharp fall in registrations signals a deeper shift in global sentiment and strategy among international professionals.

USCIS Introduces New Guidelines to Strengthen Integrity of Medical Disability Certifications for Naturalization

Staff ReporterImmigration 0

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced the implementation of updated policy guidance aimed at reinforcing the credibility of the Form N-648 process, which grants exceptions to the English and civics requirements for naturalization based on medical disabilities.

This newly issued guidance marks a significant shift in how Form N-648, the Medical Certification for Disability Exceptions, will be evaluated. With a sharper focus on the authenticity of medical documentation and the detection and prevention of fraudulent submissions, USCIS is seeking to safeguard the integrity of the naturalization system. The updated policy reflects concerns that, over the years, certain individuals and medical practitioners have misused the certification process.

Highlighting the importance of the changes, USCIS noted, “Across the country and over the decades, there have been numerous instances where the medical certification process has been exploited.” The agency further stated, “When a medical professional provides a false certification, it not only undermines the purpose of the disability exception but also weakens the credibility of the entire naturalization system because it causes USCIS to naturalize aliens who have not established eligibility for naturalization.”

By default, individuals applying for U.S. citizenship are required to demonstrate proficiency in the English language, as well as a foundational understanding of U.S. history, government, and civic principles. However, applicants suffering from certain physical or developmental disabilities, or mental impairments, may qualify for an exemption from these requirements. To be eligible for such an exemption, applicants must file Form N-648, which documents and confirms their medical condition. This form must be completed and signed by a licensed medical professional who has personally evaluated the applicant.

The updated guidance stipulates that it is not enough for an applicant to simply be diagnosed with a disability. The medical professional must clearly articulate how the specific condition hinders the applicant’s ability to comply with the English and civics testing requirements. As the USCIS emphasized, “The presence of a disability alone is not sufficient.” Rather, the medical certification must directly link the disability or impairment to the applicant’s inability to meet naturalization criteria.

Additionally, the new policy takes aim at practices that may raise red flags for potential fraud. For example, the concurrent submission of multiple Forms N-648 for a single applicant is now flagged as a matter of concern. “Submitting multiple Forms N-648 concurrently may raise concerns about the credibility of the disability or impairment claim and could be subject to further review,” the guidance notes. This measure is designed to deter individuals from attempting to manipulate the process by seeking out multiple or conflicting medical opinions in hopes of receiving a favorable outcome.

This policy change is not an isolated action but part of a broader initiative aligned with recent executive orders aimed at strengthening the integrity of immigration processes. Specifically, the USCIS guidance is in accordance with Executive Order 14148, titled Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions, and Executive Order 14159, Protecting the American People Against Invasion. These directives reflect the current administration’s intent to reverse policies deemed detrimental to immigration accountability and national security, and to prioritize lawful and transparent procedures.

According to USCIS, the updated guidance is being integrated into Volume 12 of the USCIS Policy Manual, which deals specifically with citizenship and naturalization. Importantly, these changes are effective immediately. The guidance will apply to all naturalization applications and associated Form N-648 submissions made on or after June 13, 2025.

By reinforcing these procedures, USCIS is seeking to bolster public confidence in the naturalization process, ensuring that only eligible individuals benefit from exemptions. This change, the agency suggests, will help uphold the legitimacy of the nation’s immigration system, protecting it from abuse while continuing to provide accommodations for genuinely deserving applicants.

In essence, the revised guidance strives to strike a balance between compassion and compliance. It allows exemptions for individuals with legitimate medical conditions but simultaneously introduces necessary safeguards to deter misuse. USCIS’s actions demonstrate its ongoing commitment to maintaining the integrity and fairness of the U.S. naturalization process while guarding against vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

The decision to intensify scrutiny over the medical certification process reflects broader immigration enforcement trends. By targeting weaknesses in the system, such as fraudulent documentation and misleading medical claims, the agency is aligning its procedures with national priorities focused on lawful conduct and eligibility verification.

Overall, this policy aims to refine the naturalization application process by ensuring that disability waivers are granted only when justified by clearly documented and well-explained medical evidence. With the introduction of this guidance, USCIS is signaling a firm stance on preventing abuse of legal pathways to citizenship while remaining committed to upholding the rights of applicants with legitimate medical needs.

By doing so, the agency hopes to prevent further erosion of trust in the system and ensure that exemptions are based on factual and thoroughly verified claims. It serves as a reminder to both applicants and medical professionals that integrity and accuracy in documentation are not optional but essential to the process.

In conclusion, USCIS’s new policy guidance on Form N-648 marks a pivotal step in enhancing the oversight and reliability of medical disability certifications in the naturalization process. By tightening the requirements for documentation, addressing concerns about potential fraud, and supporting the current administration’s executive directives, the agency aims to protect both the credibility of the naturalization system and the rightful claims of individuals who genuinely qualify for such exceptions.

-+=