Category: Visa

US Visa Issues Cause 70-80% Drop in Indian Students

Staff ReporterEducation, Visa 0

U.S. universities are experiencing a significant decline in Indian student enrollments, with a reported 70-80% decrease due to ongoing visa appointment issues and a rise in visa rejections.

U.S. institutions are facing a sharp reduction in the number of Indian students enrolling for studies this year due to complications in the visa application process and an increase in the rate of visa denials. Educational consultants in Hyderabad note that the volume of students heading to the U.S. has decreased by about 70%, exacerbated by a shortage of available visa appointment slots and an unexpected rise in visa rejections.

Normally, by this time of the year, most prospective students would have completed their visa interviews and prepared for their journey. This time, however, they find themselves in perpetual uncertainty, constantly checking the visa portal in hopes of securing an appointment. “It’s the worst in years,” said Sanjeev Rai of Hyderabad Overseas Consultant to The Times of India.

Despite assurances from U.S. authorities that visa slots would be released incrementally, students remain anxious due to the lack of clarity in the scheduling process. Ankit Jain from Window Overseas Education Consultancy mentioned that even those who manage to book slots often do not receive confirmation, suggesting that the U.S. might be testing its system without formally announcing it.

The situation has forced many students to look for educational opportunities in other countries. For instance, a 23-year-old aspiring to pursue a master’s degree in automotive engineering has decided to explore options in Germany, concerned that waiting further might cost them an entire academic year.

Arvind Manduva from I20 Fever consultancy remarked on the urgency of the situation, stating, “If slots aren’t released in the next few days, thousands of dreams will be shattered.” He noted that the drop in student numbers might reach as high as 80%, with his office receiving panic calls daily from concerned students and parents.

Furthermore, students who had lodged their applications as early as March and secured interview slots are encountering unusually high rejection rates. Jain indicated that many students getting rejected had all the typical indicators of approval—clean social media profiles among them. Most are receiving a denial under Section 214(b) of the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act, which suggests they have not adequately proven their intention to return to their home country after their studies.

Ravi Lothumalla from US Admission, an immigration consultancy based in Dallas, noted that this rule is longstanding but now appears to be stringently enforced. The U.S. Consulate General in Hyderabad confirmed the resumption of some visa slots and advised students to regularly check for appointments on their website or the embassy’s platform. A spokesperson stated, “We’re working to fully vet visa applicants… and encourage applicants to apply as early as they can and anticipate additional processing time.”

India has been a significant source of international students for the U.S., surpassing China last year with over 330,000 students enrolling in American universities. However, this trend could reverse as more Indian students consider European institutions, a number already on the rise according to data from the Ministry of External Affairs, which recorded over 1.16 million Indian students studying abroad as of January 1, 2024.

Source: Original article

Trump Administration Evaluates New H-1B Visa Issuance Method

Staff ReporterImmigration, Politics, Visa 0

The Trump administration is exploring a potential overhaul of the H-1B visa lottery system by introducing a weighted selection process.

The Trump administration has revealed plans to potentially change the way H-1B visas are administered, particularly by introducing a “weighted selection process.” In a recent submission to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) indicated it is considering alterations for the capped part of the H-1B system.

The H-1B visa program, which grants 85,000 visas annually, has become a battleground for supporters and opponents. President Donald Trump’s supporters are advocating for more stringent immigration controls, while prominent figures like Elon Musk, along with the president, continue to back the initiative. This visa is a critical pathway for tech companies to hire highly skilled foreign professionals, a point of contention for those who believe it displaces American workers.

Details regarding the potential weighted selection process remain sparse, according to the DHS filing. Nonetheless, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has been mentioned as a responsible entity for implementing these potential changes. Traditionally, H-1B visas are distributed through a lottery system, which aims to provide an equal chance for all applicants. Yet, large corporations such as Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are able to submit more applications, disproportionately securing more visas.

Earlier this year, the Institute for Progress, an independent think tank focusing on innovation policy, proposed removing the lottery system. They reasoned that assessing applications based on criteria like seniority or salary could enhance the program’s economic value significantly. Doing so would, according to the think tank, allocate visas to the most qualified temporary immigrants.

Connor O’Brien, an Economic Innovation Group researcher, expressed support for rethinking the H-1B allocation system by emphasizing, “The details of the rule and how it is implemented will matter a lot. But eliminating the H-1B lottery in favor of a system that prioritizes higher earners first is a no-brainer.”

As of now, no specific timeline has been announced for these changes. It’s also unlikely that next year’s H-1B applicants will be affected, given that the current year’s quota is already filled.

Source: Original article

Green Card News Issued by U.S. Immigration Officials

Staff ReporterImmigration, U.S., Visa 0

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has published its August 2025 visa bulletin, detailing significant updates on the processing dates for various immigrant visa categories.

The monthly release of the visa bulletin serves as a crucial resource for individuals and families aiming for permanent residency in the United States, guiding them through what is often a challenging and prolonged process.

For applicants seeking green cards, keeping abreast of the visa bulletin is essential. It helps determine the timeline for adjusting their immigration status by providing updates on when they become eligible, which primarily depends on the date a sponsorship petition was filed by either an employer or family member. This establishes the priority date, distinct from the date of filing for permanent residence, which the bulletin governs to indicate when immigrants can move forward with their applications.

The USCIS’s latest bulletin arrives at a time when the agency is grappling with a significant backlog of approximately 11.3 million pending applications. The new updates in the bulletin are vital for applicants who need clarity on when they can proceed with their green card applications.

The State Department’s issuance of the bulletin includes updated priority dates that provide a framework for when applicants can either file their visa applications or adjust their immigration status. For the fiscal year 2025, family-sponsored immigrants face a limit of 226,000 visas, as outlined in Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Meanwhile, employment-based preference immigrants have a global cap of at least 140,000 visas annually.

Further, per the INA’s Section 202, country-specific limits are enforced for preference immigrants, capping each nation’s share at 7 percent of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based visa numbers combined—amounting to about 25,620 visas per country. Dependent territories have a separate limit of 2 percent or 7,320 visas.

These statutory constraints heavily influence visa availability and wait times, especially for countries with high demand such as India and China. The bulletin’s findings illustrate how important these priority dates are for Indian nationals, who often face extended wait times due to these limits and the existing backlog.

While some family-based visa categories have seen minimal progress with queues advancing by a month, the employment-based visa categories largely remain stagnant. Notably, Indian applicants in high-demand professional fields are particularly affected by these persistent backlogs.

In a modest development, the August bulletin indicates that the employment-based second preference EB-2 visa for Indian nationals has advanced by around one month, a slight but meaningful improvement for many applicants waiting in line. Conversely, other significant employment-based categories, like EB-3 for India, remain static, further highlighting the ongoing challenges faced by Indian professionals striving for green cards.

EB-2 and EB-3 are critical categories for employment-based green cards that allow foreign nationals to secure permanent residency in the United States through their professional work. EB-2 is intended for those with advanced degrees or exceptional ability in fields like science, arts, or business. EB-3 caters to skilled workers with at least two years of experience, professionals with a bachelor’s degree, and individuals in unskilled positions requiring less than two years of training. Despite differences in eligibility and processing times, both categories offer pathways to a green card.

The bulletin similarly outlines a stagnant situation for Chinese applicants in employment-based categories. For family-based immigration, however, some categories continue with gradual progress, offering slight relief to families prolonged by extensive visa wait times.

Applicants must consider the “dates for filing” section in the bulletin, which indicates the earliest time they can submit applications for status adjustment or an immigrant visa, based on their visa category and country of origin. The “final action dates” signal when a visa number becomes available, permitting an application to be approved, thereby leading to permanent residency.

To apply in August 2025, applicants need a priority date that precedes the date listed for their respective visa category and country of chargeability in the bulletin, confirming their eligibility to proceed. The final action dates are crucial to processing green card applications as they dictate when a case can be approved, affecting the wait time for obtaining a green card.

Doug Rand, a former senior official at USCIS during the Biden administration, commented on the situation: “There are two very different backlogs at play. USCIS and the State Department have administrative backlogs, which are cases ready to process as soon as possible. But the visa bulletin reflects a statutory backlog—Congress imposed annual limits on green cards back in 1990, and this has created huge bottlenecks that the executive branch can’t fix on its own,” according to Newsweek.

U.S. Introduces Visa Integrity Fee for Non-Immigrants

Staff ReporterImmigration, U.S., Visa 0

The newly enacted “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” introduces a $250 “visa integrity fee” for most non-immigrant U.S. visas, significantly increasing costs for applicants.

The U.S. has established a $250 “visa integrity fee” for non-immigrant visa applicants as part of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” otherwise known as H.R.-1. This fee will come into effect in fiscal 2026 and applies to most categories of non-immigrant visas, including B-1/B-2 for tourism and business, F and M for students, H-1B for workers, and J for exchange visitors.

According to Fragomen, a U.S.-based immigration firm, President Donald Trump signed H.R.-1 into law on July 4. The legislation also involves additional non-waivable travel surcharges, such as a $24 I-94 fee, a $13 Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) fee for Visa Waiver Program travelers, and a $30 Electronic Visa Update System (EVUS) fee for certain Chinese nationals with 10-year B-1/B-2 visas.

These changes mean that a B-1/B-2 visa for Indian nationals, currently costing about $185, could see its cost rise to approximately $472 when factoring in the $250 integrity fee, $24 I-94 fee, and $13 ESTA fee. The total cost of a B-1/B-2 visa for Indian nationals may increase to nearly two-and-a-half times the current amount due to the new surcharges.

The law allows for future fee increases through regulation, which advocates claim will enhance compliance and reduce visa overstays. The initial $250 fee set for fiscal 2025 could be higher if adjusted by the Department of Homeland Security. From 2026 onward, the fee will be indexed to inflation, rising annually according to changes in the Consumer Price Index.

Additional fee increases include a $1,000 charge for asylum applications and parolees, a $500 fee for Temporary Protected Status, a $100 annual charge for asylum seekers with pending cases, and a $1,500 fee for adjusting to lawful permanent resident status.

Diplomatic applicants categorized under A and G are exempt from this fee. The legislation stipulates in 14 instances that the fee “shall not be waived or reduced.”

The possibility of a refund exists for applicants who comply with visa conditions, though it requires submitting documentation such as timely departure records or proof of status adjustment. Refunds will not happen automatically; the Secretary of Homeland Security may provide reimbursement after the visa’s validity period expires if compliance can be demonstrated. Otherwise, the fee is to be transferred to the U.S. Treasury’s general fund.

Additionally, the U.S. is considering a significant change to its visa policy by imposing fixed stays for F, J, and I visa holders, a move that could impact over 420,000 Indian students. In June, the U.S. Embassy in India mandated that Indian applicants for F, M, or J student visas must set their social media accounts to ‘public’ before their visa interviews.

These developments underscore the evolving landscape for non-immigrant visas in the U.S., driven by efforts to ensure integrity and compliance, though they present potential financial and procedural hurdles for applicants worldwide.

Source: Original article

H-1B Techie Concerned About Cultural Adjustment for Children

Staff ReporterIndia, Visa 0

An H-1B visa holder employed by a major tech company in the U.S. may soon have to return to India, raising concerns over how his children will adapt to the cultural changes.

A non-resident Indian (NRI) working for a leading technology company in the U.S. is facing the possibility of losing his job, which might force him and his family to relocate to India. He articulated his apprehensions in a post on Reddit, noting the uncertainty surrounding his employment status and the challenges of the current job market.

The NRI, who is on an H-1B visa and employed by a FAANG firm, stated, “I am now working for a FAANG business in the US, but there is a very high chance that my position will be cut in the next few months.” He expressed concerns about finding new employment opportunities in the near future if he loses his current job.

Beyond career worries, the NRI also voiced concern for his children, who are currently in elementary and high school. The family plans to relocate to Bangalore, and he is particularly anxious about how well his children will adjust to the cultural shift they would face in India.

On social media, fellow users shared various perspectives regarding the potential move. One user commented, “It will be a big deal only if you make it one. Kids are a lot more resilient than we give them credit for.” Others echoed similar sentiments, with personal anecdotes of moving back and finding success in helping their children adapt.

Some, however, acknowledged the challenges associated with adjusting to a new lifestyle and work culture, pointing out that the quality of life and job market in India could pose significant hurdles. A user remarked on the difficulty his own children faced when adapting to the Indian educational system after spending time in the U.S., though he noted that perseverance ultimately allowed them to succeed.

Further discussion included the complexities surrounding children’s citizenship status and the potential impact on familial relationships. One commenter highlighted that the elder child, not being a U.S. citizen, might face distinct challenges if in the future, they decide to return to the U.S., suggesting it may create familial rifts.

Overall, the situation underscores the multiple dimensions of uncertainty that NRIs face when contemplating a return to their home country, balancing career prospects, and family welfare.

Source: Original article

Justice Department’s Citizenship Revocations May Violate Constitutional Rights

Staff ReporterU.S., Visa 0

The Trump administration is intensifying efforts to strip citizenship from naturalized Americans, targeting cases across ten broad categories, according to a recent Justice Department directive.

The Justice Department’s recent memo signifies a substantial policy shift, as it urges the department to “maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by evidence.” This move marks a distinct push to revoke citizenship on a massive scale, affecting naturalized Americans nationwide.

Denaturalization differs from deportation in that it involves a civil lawsuit that revokes a person’s U.S. citizenship, subsequently turning them back into noncitizens who can then face deportation. The government can pursue denaturalization if it can prove that an individual “illegally procured” their citizenship by failing to meet legal requirements or by committing fraud during the naturalization process.

The new directive promotes a “maximal enforcement” policy, effectively seeking denaturalization in any case where evidence supports such action, irrespective of the strength of the evidence or the priority level. This has led to instances like Baljinder Singh, whose citizenship was revoked after a name discrepancy, potentially the result of a translator’s error rather than fraudulent intent.

Historically, denaturalization was a rare occurrence until the 1940s and 1950s during the Red Scare, as suspicion of communism and Nazism prompted a surge in such cases. Between 1907 and 1967, over 22,000 Americans were denaturalized. However, the landmark Supreme Court case Afroyim v. Rusk in 1967 restricted the government from revoking citizenship without consent, except in cases involving fraud.

Since then, denaturalization was seldom pursued; from 1968 to 2013, under 150 individuals lost their citizenship, mainly due to concealed war crimes. The current approach stands in contrast with this history, sparking concerns among legal scholars about violations of constitutional rights.

In civil denaturalization cases, individuals lack access to free legal counsel, jury trials, and face a lower burden of proof—”clear and convincing evidence”—compared to criminal cases which require “beyond a reasonable doubt” proof. The absence of a statute of limitations allows the government to investigate cases irrespective of how long ago the alleged misconduct occurred.

The expansion of denaturalization has significant implications for democracy and societal security, as a core tenet of citizenship lies in its permanence. The fear that naturalized citizens might lose their status at any time undermines their full participation in American democracy.

The Justice Department’s directive outlines 10 categories for denaturalization, ranging from national security threats and war crimes to various frauds and financial crimes. This policy effectively creates two categories of American citizens: those born in the U.S., who face no risk of losing their citizenship, and naturalized citizens, who may remain vulnerable throughout their lives.

Individuals, such as a woman who became a naturalized citizen in 2007 and later faced potential denaturalization due to non-disclosure of a crime she was involved in unaware at her naturalization time, illustrate the precariousness of this policy. She cooperated with an FBI investigation and completed her legal sentence, yet decades later her citizenship was under scrutiny.

This intensified scrutiny could significantly impact approximately 20 million naturalized Americans, whose decades-old paperwork discrepancies might now threaten their citizenship status. The Justice Department’s move to “maximally pursue” denaturalization cases, alongside initiatives from the first Trump administration to re-evaluate over 700,000 naturalization files, represents a considerable escalation of efforts to rescind citizenship.

Constitutional challenges to this policy are anticipated, as they raise significant concerns about its alignment with the principles established in Afroyim v. Rusk, which underscored the inviolability of citizenship as a fundamental right.

As legal and academic critiques continue, the debate surrounding the policy’s implications unfolds, with broader consequences looming over the security and integrity of naturalized citizenship in America.

Source: Original article

US Imposes $250 Visa Fee for Tourists, Students from 2026

Staff ReporterImmigration, Visa 0

Indian nationals traveling to the United States will face a significant increase in visa-related costs starting in 2026, as part of a broad immigration overhaul under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Indian nationals traveling to the United States for tourism, education, or temporary work will soon face a significant increase in visa-related costs.

Beginning in 2026, a new $250 “Visa Integrity Fee” will be levied on most non-immigrant visa categories under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1), which was signed into law by U.S. President Donald Trump on July 4.

The surcharge will apply to B-1/B-2 tourist and business visas, F and M student visas, H-1B work visas, and J-1 exchange visas, among others. Only diplomatic visa classes (A and G) are exempt.

The fee will be collected by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) at the time of visa issuance and is framed as a refundable security deposit. To be eligible for a refund, travelers must comply with all visa conditions—such as departing the U.S. within five days of expiration or adjusting their immigration status legally—and submit the required documentation.

The $250 charge is in addition to existing costs. The current $185 Machine-Readable Visa (MRV) application fee remains unchanged, but applicants will also be required to pay a $24 I-94 surcharge for entry/exit tracking.

Those using the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) or Electronic Visa Update System (EVUS) will incur additional fees of $13 and $30, respectively. For Indian travelers, the total cost of obtaining a U.S. visa could rise to approximately $480, effectively doubling current expenses.

The new surcharge is part of a broader immigration overhaul under the One Big Beautiful Bill, which allocates $150 billion through 2029 for expanded immigration enforcement.

The legislation increases funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), expands detention infrastructure, accelerates deportations, and limits asylum access. These measures will be partially funded through higher visa fees and a new 1 percent tax on foreign remittances, according to the Immigration Advocacy Project.

While the DHS maintains that the Visa Integrity Fee will promote compliance and deter overstays, critics argue that the fee disproportionately burdens applicants from countries like India, which sees high demand for U.S. visas. Education providers, technology employers, and travel industry representatives have warned that the increased financial burden may discourage students and skilled workers from choosing the U.S.

Estimates suggest that the new visa and related fees could generate $64 billion through 2034, contributing to federal tax and enforcement funding—but at a substantial cost to immigrant communities.

Source: Original article

India Sees 27% Decline in US Student Visas Since COVID

Staff ReporterImmigration, Visa 0

The issuance of student visas to Indian nationals for studying in the United States experienced a notable 27 percent decline between March and May this year, representing the slowest start to the visa season since the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The latest statistics from the U.S. State Department reveal that 9,906 F-1 visas were issued to Indian students during the referenced period. This marks a significant decrease from the 13,478 visas granted in the same months the previous year, and an even lower figure than the 10,894 visas issued in 2022, when international travel had only recently resumed.

The months from March to May typically witness a surge in visa processing as students gear up for the Fall semester, which generally commences in August or September. However, this year’s downturn coincides with a renewed immigration crackdown under the Trump administration, characterized by the introduction of more rigorous screening procedures for international students.

In late May, the U.S. State Department issued a directive halting new interview scheduling for F, M, and J visa applicants. This suspension of appointments, which lasted from May 27 to June 18, was a global measure as embassies were instructed to adhere to the newly implemented protocols.

The directive, endorsed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, sought to enforce mandatory social media scrutiny. Visa applicants were required to disclose their social media profiles from the preceding five years, a mandate that has stirred concerns among prospective students about processing delays and potential backlogs.

The U.S. Embassy in New Delhi issued public advisories urging Indian visa applicants to comply with these new conditions. Meanwhile, the policy adjustments have led to visa cancellations across at least 32 states in the U.S. Reports indicate that some of these cancellations involved Indian students and were associated with involvement in pro-Palestinian protests or previous legal infractions, such as DUIs, although in several cases, the reasons for cancellation were not explicitly communicated.

In response to the augmented scrutiny, many students have taken proactive measures to sanitize their digital footprints. This includes removing sensitive posts, unfollowing accounts, and tightening privacy settings in an effort to mitigate the risk of visa rejection under the expanded vetting processes.

Despite the current slowdown, Indian students continue to represent the largest cohort of international students in the United States. According to Open Doors 2024, Indian students overtook their Chinese counterparts during the 2023–2024 academic year, becoming the top contributors to the foreign student population.

Nevertheless, the overall trend for 2024 has been one of decline. From January to September of the previous year, Indian students were granted 64,008 F-1 visas, a decrease from 103,000 in 2023 and 93,181 in 2022.

Source: Original article

Immigration Officials Warn Green Card Holders of New Risks

Staff ReporterImmigration, U.S., Visa 0

Green card holders in the United States have been cautioned that their legal status could be at risk if they have a criminal record and violate immigration laws.

Federal authorities have issued a warning to green card holders, noting that the U.S. government has the power to revoke legal residency for those who break and abuse national laws. A statement from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) emphasized that lawful permanent residents arriving at U.S. ports of entry with previous criminal convictions could face detention before removal proceedings.

The advisory comes amid heightened immigration enforcement under the Trump administration, which has vowed to deport millions of undocumented immigrants as part of a stringent deportation strategy. The administration has labeled anyone present in the country illegally as a “criminal.”

In addition to focusing on undocumented individuals, the government’s rigorous operations have also subjected immigrants with valid visas and green cards to detention. Various reports have highlighted numerous instances of green card holders being ensnared in immigration raids.

Reports from the Office of Homeland Security Statistics estimate that 12.8 million lawful permanent residents, or green card holders, were living in the United States as of January 1, 2024. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has stated that lawful permanent residents who breach immigration laws could lose their status and face deportation procedures.

Amelia Wilson, an assistant professor at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law and director of the Immigration Justice Clinic, underscored that there are defined legal protections in place to prevent abrupt revocation of a green card holder’s status. “The law contained within the Immigration and Nationality Act is clear,” Wilson explained to Newsweek. “The Department of Homeland Security cannot unilaterally ‘revoke’ a permanent resident’s status. There is a process the agency must follow, including serving the individual with a ‘Notice of Intent to Rescind,’ at which time that individual is entitled to a hearing before an immigration judge.”

Under the Trump administration, agencies such as CBP, USCIS, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have embarked on comprehensive social media campaigns. These campaigns encourage undocumented immigrants to self-deport, highlight criminal arrests, and maintain a significantly larger online presence than in previous administrations.

The administration is also taking action to revoke visas of foreign students allegedly involved in pro-Hamas activities, demonstrating, and distributing flyers on college campuses. This move is part of a broader executive order aimed at combating antisemitism and targeting supporters of extremist groups. The expanded crackdown includes immigration enforcement against pro-Palestinian activists holding green cards.

Several high-profile detentions have occurred, such as the case of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and Columbia graduate student, who was arrested at his university-owned apartment.

Wilson pointed out that during these proceedings, it falls upon the government to prove by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that a permanent resident should lose their status. “At that point, it is the immigration judge—and only the immigration judge—who can effectively strip an individual of their green card,” Wilson added.

Public officials have echoed similar sentiments about enforcement. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated on social media: “We will be revoking the visas and/or green cards of Hamas supporters in America so they can be deported.” In another statement, USCIS noted that “Green cards and visas will be revoked if an alien breaks the law, supports terrorism, overstays their permitted visit time, performs illegal work, or anything else that violates the terms on which we granted them this privilege or compromises the safety of our fellow Americans.” Additionally, CBP reminded green card holders that having a criminal history does not constitute exemplary behavior for lawful permanent residents, emphasizing that possessing a green card is a privilege, not a right.

Source: Original article

Indian Applicants Face US Visa Appointment Challenges Despite Consulate Interviews

Staff ReporterPolitics, Visa 0

Since the U.S. consulates in India resumed F-1 student visa interviews, applicants still face chaos, with scarce appointments and growing uncertainty threatening their educational plans.

Despite the resumption of F-1 student visa interviews at U.S. consulates in India on June 26, students continue to struggle with securing appointments, leading to significant anxiety and uncertainty.

As students prepare for the start of their courses in August, they face the challenge of obtaining visa appointments in a timely manner. The lack of available slots, coupled with the increase in 221(g) administrative processing notices, is jeopardizing their plans and investments.

LaunchEd co-founder Kajal Dave described the situation as “a mess,” pointing out that many students who have already paid tuition, booked flights, and found housing are unable to secure visa appointments. The financial implications are severe, with potential losses estimated to range between ₹12 and ₹35 lakh, covering tuition fees, housing deposits, and airfare if students cannot travel in time and their universities do not permit deferrals.

One student expressed their frustration and panic online, stating that visa slots in India have not been opened, leaving them feeling lost and hopeless as their course is set to begin on August 20.

Another student shared a similar concern, saying their university recommended deferring enrollment to the next fall due to these issues. The additional concern of receiving a 221(g) notice after securing an interview adds further uncertainty, as visa approvals remain on indefinite hold.

The U.S. Embassy website has recently cautioned that student or exchange visitor visa applicants without existing appointments may not be able to schedule an interview this summer, amplifying students’ worries.

This situation follows a month-long visa freeze from May 27 to June 26, hitting the peak student season and compounding broader systematic issues. According to a report by Business Standard, these challenges stem from a substantial backlog and an evolving adjudication policy, with increased scrutiny over digital footprints and social media causing further delays.

Currently, the wait time for appointments in India averages 45 to 60 days, with Kolkata experiencing the longest delays. As a result, many students are missing important university start dates.

Experts recommend that students facing these challenges can apply for emergency appointments through UStraveldocs or consult with their university’s Designated School Official (DSO) regarding deferral or temporary online study options. Ensuring that Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) and I-20 documents are up to date is also crucial if deferring is necessary.

The root of the current slot shortage combines the aforementioned visa freeze during a critical period and stricter visa vetting processes implemented in recent years. While students may request emergency appointments via the official UStraveldocs website, they must provide appropriate university documentation to support their application.

The U.S. Embassy has not confirmed if additional bulk slot openings will occur before the August 2025 intake, leaving students uncertain about future opportunities to secure their visas in time.

According to Business Standard

Source: Original article

USCIS to Launch Organizational Accounts, Enabling Online Collaboration and Submission of H-1B Registrations

USCISImmigration, Visa 0

WASHINGTON—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services today announced the upcoming launch of a package of customer experience improvements for H-1B cap season. The measures are expected to increase efficiency and ease collaboration for organizations and their legal representatives.

USCIS will launch organizational accounts for non-cap filings and the fiscal year (FY) 2025 H-1B cap season. The introduction of organizational accounts will allow multiple individuals within an organization, such as a company or other business entity, and their legal representatives to collaborate on and prepare H-1B registrations, Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, and associated Form I-907, Request for Premium Processing Service.

“USCIS is always striving to improve and streamline our processes, and this is a big step forward,” said USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou. “Once we launch the organizational accounts and online filing of I-129 H-1B petitions, the entire H-1B lifecycle becomes fully electronic — from registration, if applicable, to our final decision and transmission to the Department of State.”

USCIS expects to launch the organizational accounts in February 2024, with online filing of Forms I-129 and I-907 following shortly thereafter. In addition to streamlining the Form I-129 H-1B petition process, these changes should help reduce duplicate H-1B registrations and other common errors.

USCIS will also transition the paper filing location for Forms I-129 and I-907 from service centers to the USCIS lockbox as part of our efforts to increase efficiency by standardizing processes and reducing costs.

USCIS will host two national engagements on organizational accounts on Jan. 23 and 24 as well as several smaller sessions leading up to the H-1B registration period to help guide organizations and legal representatives through the process. During these sessions individuals will have the opportunity to ask questions about the organizational accounts in preparation for the FY 2025 H-1B electronic registration process and launch of online filing of Form I-129 for H-1B petitions. USCIS encourages all individuals involved in the H-1B registration and petition filing process to attend these engagements. Invitations to these engagements will be sent later this month. Visit our Contact Public Engagement page to subscribe to notifications about upcoming engagements. Additional details regarding organizational accounts will be available on the H-1B Electronic Registration Process page.

For more information about which forms are eligible for online filing, visit our Forms Available to File Online page.

For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow us on Twitter (@uscis), Instagram (/uscis), YouTube (/uscis), Facebook (/uscis), and LinkedIn (/uscis).

– USCIS –

-+=