True Colors of Indian-American Voters in New York City

Recent voting data reveals a significant political shift among Indian and South Asian voters in New York City, with a majority supporting candidate Zohran Mamdani in the recent general election.

Recent voting data from New York City’s general election highlights a notable political shift among Indian and South Asian voters, with a strong majority backing Zohran Mamdani. According to available voter polls and precinct-level results, Indian-origin voters played a decisive role in his electoral success.

Mamdani secured approximately 60% of the Asian vote citywide, a significant margin in a highly diverse electorate. This support was particularly pronounced in neighborhoods with large Indian and South Asian populations.

In South Richmond Hill and Ozone Park, often referred to as “Little Punjab,” Mamdani won by 21 percentage points in the general election, a dramatic increase from his 7-point margin during the primary. This shift indicates not only a consolidation of support but also effective voter mobilization efforts.

Similarly, Jackson Heights, one of New York City’s historic South Asian hubs, experienced what analysts described as a “seismic shift.” Mamdani carried the majority of precincts in the area, signaling a growing alignment between his platform and the priorities of South Asian voters.

The New York City metropolitan area is home to an estimated 710,000 Indians and Indian Americans, with an active South Asian electorate estimated at roughly 300,000 voters. Mamdani’s campaign was credited with energizing this base—particularly younger, working-class, and first-time voters, many of whom have traditionally had lower turnout rates.

Campaign organizers and observers noted that this mobilization was not incidental but the result of sustained, targeted outreach efforts.

Mamdani, who has Indian and Ugandan-Indian heritage, ran a campaign deeply rooted in cultural familiarity and economic messaging. His mother, the internationally acclaimed filmmaker Mira Nair, further elevated his visibility within Indian-American households.

Cultural outreach was a central pillar of his strategy. Mamdani released campaign videos in Hindi and Punjabi, made frequent visits to Gurdwaras and Mandirs, and incorporated South Asian cultural symbols into public events. His election-night victory speech famously featured the Bollywood track “Dhoom Machale,” reinforcing cultural resonance with younger Desi voters.

Equally important was his policy focus on affordability. Exit polls and post-election analyses suggest that Indian voters—like many other New Yorkers—were drawn to his “Mandate for Affordability,” which prioritized housing costs, healthcare access, transportation, and cost-of-living concerns over traditional party loyalties or establishment endorsements.

Mamdani also benefited from institutional backing within the Indian-American political ecosystem. He received the endorsement of the Indian American Impact Fund, which helped mobilize over $20 million in resources toward South Asian voter engagement and candidate support nationwide.

This support translated into coordinated grassroots organizing, multilingual voter education, and turnout efforts that proved decisive in key precincts.

The election results underscore a broader trend: Indian and South Asian voters in New York City are no longer a passive or predictable voting bloc. Instead, they are increasingly issue-driven, culturally engaged, and willing to support candidates who speak directly to their lived realities.

Mamdani’s victory illustrates how targeted outreach, cultural fluency, and a clear economic message can reshape political participation and redefine assumptions about the Indian-American vote in urban America, according to AP Voter Poll.

California Pauses Truck Driver License Revocations Amid Lawsuit Response

California has paused the revocation of thousands of commercial truck driving licenses for migrant drivers following a lawsuit from Sikh and immigrant rights groups, allowing more time for retesting and reapplication.

SACRAMENTO, CA – In a significant development, California has halted plans to revoke approximately 17,000 commercial truck driving licenses held by migrant drivers. This decision comes in the wake of a lawsuit filed by Sikh and immigrant rights organizations, prompting a delay in the enforcement of the revocation that was set to take effect this week.

The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) announced that affected drivers will now be permitted to continue operating their vehicles while they are given an additional two months to retest and reapply for their licenses. This postponement is a response to concerns raised by advocacy groups regarding the fairness of the revocation process.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy expressed strong disapproval of the delay, reiterating a warning issued late last year. Duffy indicated that the federal government could potentially withhold up to $160 million in transportation funding from California if the state does not comply with federal requirements to revoke licenses deemed unlawfully issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DoT).

The DoT has identified that failures in California’s licensing process allowed thousands of foreign drivers to obtain commercial licenses in violation of federal regulations. This issue has gained attention following fatal crashes involving Sikh drivers in Florida and near Los Angeles, which raised questions about their immigration status and the validity of their licenses.

The DMV’s decision to delay the enforcement of license revocations comes just days after the agency was sued in state court. The Sikh Coalition and the Asian Law Caucus filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of California drivers, arguing that immigrant truck drivers are being unfairly targeted. They contend that licenses are being canceled due to minor paperwork discrepancies rather than legitimate safety concerns.

According to reports, an estimated 150,000 Punjabi Sikhs are employed in the American trucking industry, highlighting the significant role that this community plays in the sector.

This ongoing situation underscores the complexities surrounding immigration, licensing, and safety regulations in the trucking industry, as well as the challenges faced by immigrant drivers in navigating these systems.

As the situation develops, it remains to be seen how California will balance federal requirements with the rights and concerns of its immigrant driver population. The outcome of this legal battle may set important precedents for similar cases in the future, reflecting broader issues of equity and justice within the transportation sector.

For further details, please refer to the Los Angeles Times.

Umar Khalid’s Father Discusses 25-Minute Meeting with Mamdani

Umar Khalid’s father, Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas, reveals his recent meeting with New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani amid ongoing controversies surrounding his son’s imprisonment.

NEW DELHI — In light of the controversy surrounding a handwritten letter from New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani to imprisoned student activist Umar Khalid, Khalid’s father, Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas, disclosed on January 2 that he met the mayor during a visit to the United States last month.

Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas, who also serves as a spokesperson for the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board, stated that Mamdani wrote a letter in support of Umar Khalid and personally delivered it to him. Ilyas expressed gratitude for Mamdani’s previous acknowledgment of his son’s work, recalling that the mayor had read excerpts from Khalid’s prison diary about two years ago.

Ilyas lamented the situation of his son, describing it as extremely unfortunate that a promising young activist, who campaigned against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC) while advocating for the rights of tribals and Dalits, has been incarcerated for nearly five years without trial or bail.

During the meeting, Ilyas noted that Mamdani assured him of all possible assistance regarding Khalid’s case. He mentioned that the mayor had also met with two U.S. Congressmen who pledged their support in the matter.

Following this meeting, Mamdani’s handwritten note, which expressed solidarity with Khalid, gained significant attention on social media platforms.

Regarding the ongoing legal battle for Umar Khalid’s bail, Ilyas shared that he was present during the recent Supreme Court hearings and expressed hope for a favorable outcome in the near future.

Umar Khalid, a student at Jawaharlal Nehru University and a prominent activist, has been detained for nearly five years in connection with the February 2020 Delhi riots.

When questioned about whether he wished for Mamdani to communicate with Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding the case, Ilyas clarified that he had not made such a request. “This is an internal matter of the country and should be resolved within the country itself,” he stated.

In discussing the broader situation of Muslims in India, Ilyas expressed concern over the prevailing attitudes towards the community. He highlighted issues of discrimination, noting that Muslim homes are being demolished and young Muslims are being wrongfully implicated in various cases. He criticized the lack of action against individuals who make inflammatory statements against the community, asserting that such developments do not reflect well on India’s image.

According to IANS, the situation surrounding Umar Khalid continues to draw attention both domestically and internationally, as advocates call for justice and fair treatment in the ongoing legal proceedings.

Maduro Capture Mirrors Noriega Takedown Using Music as Warfare

The recent capture of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela evokes memories of the U.S. operation that toppled Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega 36 years ago, highlighting the use of psychological tactics in warfare.

Nicolás Maduro’s capture in Venezuela has drawn striking parallels to the dramatic U.S. operation that brought down Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega in 1989. This event, which took place on January 3, 2026, coincidentally marks 36 years since Noriega’s own capture.

Under former President George H.W. Bush, U.S. forces launched a surprise invasion of Panama on December 20, 1989, accusing Noriega of conspiring with drug traffickers to funnel cocaine into the United States. He also faced allegations of manipulating the presidential election in Panama that year.

The primary objective of the invasion, known as Operation Just Cause, was to restore the democratically elected government of Guillermo Endara and to arrest Noriega on drug trafficking charges. According to the U.S. Army’s website, this operation was the largest and most complex combat mission since the Vietnam War.

Similar to the recent operation involving Maduro, the invasion of Panama proceeded without explicit authorization from Congress. Noriega’s capture unfolded over several weeks as he evaded arrest by seeking refuge in the Vatican’s embassy in Panama City.

In a unique psychological warfare tactic, U.S. troops employed Operation Nifty Package, which involved military vehicles equipped with loudspeakers that blasted rock music non-stop. The playlist included songs from popular bands such as The Clash, Van Halen, and U2, aimed at forcing Noriega out of hiding.

Noriega ultimately surrendered to U.S. forces on January 3, 1990, exactly 36 years prior to Maduro’s capture, and was subsequently flown to the United States to stand trial. The operation resulted in the deaths of 23 U.S. service members and left 320 others wounded. The Pentagon estimated that approximately 200 Panamanian civilians and 314 Panamanian military personnel were also killed during the invasion, according to reports from The Associated Press.

In 1992, Noriega was convicted on drug trafficking charges in a Miami federal court, receiving a 40-year prison sentence. He was granted prisoner-of-war status, which allowed him to be housed separately from other inmates and to wear his Panamanian military uniform in court. After serving 17 years in a U.S. prison, he was extradited to France and later returned to Panama, where he died in 2017.

On January 3, 2026, President Donald Trump announced that Maduro and his wife had been captured and flown out of Venezuela as part of Operation Absolute Resolve. In recent months, the U.S. military has conducted a series of strikes on suspected drug vessels allegedly linked to the Venezuelan regime in the Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific.

Until a permanent leader can be established, Trump stated that the U.S. government would “run” Venezuela “until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” reflecting the ongoing complexities of U.S. involvement in Latin America.

This operation not only highlights the historical context of U.S. interventions in the region but also raises questions about the methods employed in such endeavors, particularly the use of psychological tactics in warfare.

As the situation in Venezuela continues to evolve, the implications of Maduro’s capture and the parallels drawn with Noriega’s downfall will likely remain a topic of discussion among political analysts and historians alike, according to Axios.

Who Is Rama Duwaji? NYC’s First Gen Z First Lady

Rama Duwaji, New York City’s first Gen Z first lady, is making waves in politics and art as she supports her husband, Mayor Zohran Mamdani, while carving her own identity.

New York City has welcomed its first Gen Z first lady, Rama Duwaji, who is already gaining international attention. As the youngest first lady in the city’s history, Duwaji represents a new wave of political engagement and cultural influence among younger generations.

From New York to global platforms, discussions about Duwaji have surged across social media. Her visible support for Mayor Zohran Mamdani during key moments, her unique fashion sense, and her creative career have made her a prominent figure in contemporary American politics.

Duwaji has taken a modern approach to her public persona, opting to introduce herself through an interview with The Cut rather than a traditional magazine. This choice reflects her contemporary sensibilities and sets her apart from the conventional narratives often adopted by political spouses.

On New Year’s Day, Duwaji stood beside Mamdani during his swearing-in ceremony as New York City’s first democratic socialist mayor. Dressed in a striking brown frock coat adorned with chocolate-toned faux fur, her outfit quickly became a topic of conversation online. For many women in political life, such an inauguration outfit serves as an unspoken statement, offering insight into how they plan to navigate the complexities of their new roles.

As the initial excitement fades, it is essential to delve deeper into who Rama Duwaji is beyond her public image, fashion choices, and viral moments.

Duwaji was born in Houston, Texas, before her family moved to New York and eventually settled in suburban New Jersey. Growing up in a quiet cul-de-sac, she was shaped by her family’s stories about identity and belonging in the aftermath of 9/11. In an interview with The Cut, she reflected on the impact of those experiences on her family dynamics, stating, “I grew up hearing all about what my parents experienced. My mom is a hijabi. My dad had to shave his beard.”

In 2007, her family relocated to Dubai, but the essence of New York remained with her. Duwaji began her studies at Virginia Commonwealth University’s campus in Qatar before transferring to the main campus in Richmond, Virginia, to continue her education.

By her senior year, Duwaji was already establishing herself as a creative force, attracting clients and commissions that showcased her growing reputation. Her work gained recognition from platforms such as Vice Arabia, Spotify Arabia, and the BBC. She graduated from VCU in 2019 and spent time between Dubai and an artist residency in Paris before returning to New York in March 2021, a city she has always considered home.

It was in New York that Duwaji met Zohran Mamdani, then a state assemblyman, through the dating app Hinge. Reflecting on their meeting, she described it as a delightful surprise, saying, “I was sort of having a hot-girl summer. I didn’t necessarily expect it to happen so soon, but it was a very lovely surprise that it worked.”

Now residing in Brooklyn, Duwaji is a Syrian illustrator and animator, continuing to develop her creative career while navigating her new public life. Her art often centers on the experiences of women, blending the intimate with the political. She captures everyday moments, such as reading or making music, while also addressing significant issues, including women’s empowerment and the ongoing crisis in Yemen.

Through her illustrations, Duwaji has highlighted individual stories that might otherwise go unnoticed, such as that of Reem Ahmed, an architect from Gaza who endured a harrowing experience trapped beneath rubble after an Israeli airstrike that claimed the lives of her family members.

Earlier in 2025, photographer Kara McCurdy shared glimpses of Duwaji and Mamdani’s wedding day, adding a personal touch to their relationship, which has become part of New York’s public narrative. McCurdy, who has known the couple for years, recounted the day they tied the knot, stating, “I’ve known [Mamdani] was going to marry Rama for years, and I was there, at the city clerk’s office with them when it happened.”

As Rama Duwaji steps into her role as first lady, she embodies a new generation of leaders who are reshaping the political landscape with their unique perspectives and creative expressions. Her journey is just beginning, and the world will be watching closely as she balances her artistic endeavors with her responsibilities in the public eye.

For more insights into Duwaji’s journey and her impact, refer to The Cut.

China Conducts War Games Around Taiwan Following US Arms Deal

China has initiated extensive military exercises around Taiwan, signaling a stern warning against Taiwanese independence and external interference, following a significant U.S. arms deal with Taipei.

China has launched large-scale military exercises encircling Taiwan, deploying army, navy, air force, and rocket units in a demonstration of force that Beijing describes as a “serious warning” against Taiwanese independence and what it terms interference by “external forces.” These drills, occurring just weeks after the announcement of a landmark U.S. arms deal with Taiwan, have significantly heightened tensions in one of the world’s most sensitive geopolitical flashpoints.

The two-day exercises, officially named “Justice Mission-2025,” are being conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) under its Eastern Theater Command. According to statements from the Chinese military, the drills aim to test combat readiness and rehearse “blockade and control of key ports and critical areas” surrounding the self-governing island.

Both Chinese and Taiwanese authorities have confirmed live-fire activities and rocket launches. Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense reported that rockets fired on Tuesday landed in waters north and southwest of the island, with some impacting closer to Taiwan than in previous exercises.

“These exercises are a blatant act of military intimidation,” Taiwan’s government stated, emphasizing that its armed forces are “fully on guard” and prepared to “take concrete action to defend the values of democracy and freedom.”

The scale of the drills has been notable. In the past 24 hours, Taiwan’s defense ministry reported that China deployed 130 military aircraft and 22 naval vessels around the island. Of those sorties, 90 crossed the median line of the Taiwan Strait—an informal boundary that Beijing does not recognize but had largely respected until recent years—and entered Taiwan’s air defense identification zone.

This marks the second-highest number of Chinese warplanes ever recorded around Taiwan, surpassed only by the October 2024 drills, which saw 153 aircraft deployed over a 25-hour period.

In response, Taiwan’s military scrambled fighter jets, deployed naval vessels, and activated coastal missile systems. Lieutenant General Hsieh Jih-sheng, deputy chief of the general staff for intelligence, noted that the proximity of some rocket landings represented an escalation. “Some of the projectiles landed closer than before,” he said, highlighting growing concerns in Taipei.

The drills have also disrupted civilian life. Taiwan’s Civil Aviation Administration reported that more than 6,000 travelers have been affected, with 76 domestic flights canceled and 14 delayed due to airspace restrictions.

Analysts suggest that the timing of the drills is unlikely to be coincidental. Earlier this month, Washington and Taipei announced what could become one of the largest U.S. military sales to Taiwan to date—a package valued at $11.1 billion that includes HIMARS rocket systems, anti-tank and anti-armor missiles, loitering drones, howitzers, and advanced military software.

Additionally, Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te has proposed a historic $40 billion special defense budget, although it remains stalled in Taiwan’s opposition-controlled legislature.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi addressed the situation directly in Beijing on Tuesday, stating, “In the face of repeated provocations from the ‘Taiwan independence’ forces and the large-scale arms sales of the United States to Taiwan, it is only natural that we firmly oppose them and take forceful countermeasures.”

China’s defense ministry echoed this sentiment. “This exercise serves as a serious warning to ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist forces and external interfering forces,” said Eastern Theater Command spokesperson Shi Yi, in what appeared to be a veiled reference to the U.S. and its allies.

When asked about the drills, U.S. President Donald Trump maintained a calm demeanor, stating, “I have a great relationship with President Xi Jinping,” and adding, “Nothing worries me.” Trump suggested he did not believe China was preparing for an invasion, although he acknowledged awareness of the exercises.

The United States formally recognizes the People’s Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China but maintains close unofficial ties with Taiwan under the Taiwan Relations Act, which obligates Washington to provide Taipei with the means to defend itself.

Beijing, however, views Taiwan as its principal “red line” in U.S.-China relations. The Chinese Communist Party claims the island as its territory despite never having controlled it and has vowed to bring it under its authority, by force if necessary.

Military analysts indicate that the latest drills appear more explicitly focused on denying foreign military access to the region. Notices issued by China’s Maritime Safety Administration outlined seven exercise zones, including areas designated for live-fire drills. Analysts argue that these zones effectively create a “de facto blockade” within the Taiwan Strait.

Chieh Chung of Taiwan’s Institute for National Defense and Security Research stated, “The PLA aims to deny intervention by foreign military forces in conflicts around Taiwan and keep them out.” He noted that Beijing is being very explicit about that objective in this drill.

A Taipei-based think tank, Secure Taiwan Associate Corporation, highlighted that the overall designated exercise area is larger than in recent drills, covering nearly all sea routes linking Taiwan to its strategically important outlying islands of Kinmen and Matsu.

Alongside the military maneuvers, Beijing has launched a wave of nationalist propaganda aimed at domestic audiences. State-linked social media accounts have circulated posters depicting fiery arrows raining down on Taiwan, captioned “Arrow of Justice, Control and Denial.” An AI-generated video titled “Joint Operations to Thwart ‘Taiwan Independence’ Attempts” featured robot dogs, humanoid machines, and warships advancing on the island.

In response, President Lai condemned China’s actions, stating that the country is “disregarding the international community’s expectations for peace” and undermining regional stability through coercion. “Taiwan will not escalate tensions,” he asserted, “but we will not back down in the face of threats.”

With Chinese aircraft and ships now appearing almost daily around Taiwan, and major exercises increasing in scale and sophistication, regional observers warn that the line between drills and real-world conflict is becoming increasingly blurred.

As Beijing, Taipei, and Washington exchange warnings and reassurances, the latest war games serve as a stark reminder that Taiwan remains one of the most dangerous fault lines in global geopolitics, where military signaling, political resolve, and miscalculation could have far-reaching consequences, according to Global Net News.

Trump Confirms U.S. Strikes in Venezuela, Claims Maduro Captured

The U.S. military conducted air strikes in Venezuela, capturing President Nicolás Maduro, as tensions escalate between the two nations.

The U.S. military executed air strikes across various regions of Venezuela, including the capital city of Caracas, early Saturday morning. This operation has been confirmed by officials and marks a significant escalation in U.S.-Venezuela relations.

President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that the military operation was successful, stating that Maduro and his wife were “captured and flown out of the country.” Trump indicated that the operation was conducted in coordination with U.S. law enforcement and announced a news conference scheduled for 11 a.m. at Mar-a-Lago.

Witnesses reported hearing at least seven explosions in Caracas around 2 a.m. local time, with low-flying aircraft observed in the area. The Venezuelan government responded with a statement condemning the strikes, describing them as “very serious military aggression” and an act of “imperialist aggression.”

According to the Venezuelan government, the strikes impacted not only Caracas but also the states of Miranda, Aragua, and La Guaira. They characterized the U.S. actions as an attempt to seize Venezuela’s strategic resources, particularly oil and minerals, and to undermine the nation’s political independence.

“They will not succeed,” the statement asserted. “After more than two hundred years of independence, the people and their legitimate Government remain steadfast in defense of sovereignty and the inalienable right to decide their own destiny.” The government further claimed that attempts to impose a “colonial war” and force a regime change would fail, just as previous efforts had.

This military action comes amid ongoing U.S. efforts to target alleged drug-smuggling operations linked to the Venezuelan government. Senator Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, expressed skepticism regarding the justification for the strikes, questioning the constitutional basis for such actions without a formal declaration of war or authorization for military force.

In a pre-taped interview aired on state television, Maduro had recently indicated a willingness to negotiate with the United States regarding drug trafficking and oil. He stated, “The U.S. government knows, because we’ve told many of their spokespeople, that if they want to seriously discuss an agreement to combat drug trafficking, we’re ready.” Maduro also expressed openness to U.S. investment in Venezuela’s oil sector, particularly with companies like Chevron.

In light of the escalating situation, the U.S. Embassy in Bogotá, Colombia, issued a warning to American citizens, advising them against travel to Venezuela and instructing those currently in the country to shelter in place. A Travel Advisory from December 3 strongly urged all U.S. citizens in Venezuela to depart immediately.

Additionally, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a Notice to Airmen at 1 a.m. EST on Saturday, prohibiting all U.S. aircraft from operating at any altitude within Venezuelan airspace.

This situation is developing, and further updates are expected as more information becomes available.

According to The Associated Press, this is a breaking news story.

Key 2026 House and Senate Races That Could Decide Congress Control

Key Senate and House races in Georgia, North Carolina, Michigan, and other states will play a critical role in determining control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections.

As the 2026 midterm elections approach, Senate Republicans are gearing up to defend their slim majority, with pivotal races in states like Georgia, North Carolina, and Michigan poised to influence the balance of power in Congress.

The upcoming elections will feature 33 Senate seats in contention, a situation that often serves as a referendum on the sitting president’s performance. Republicans are optimistic about their prospects, hoping to replicate the successes they enjoyed during the midterms of President Donald Trump’s first term.

Georgia stands out as a critical battleground for the GOP. Incumbent Senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat, faces a challenging re-election campaign, and the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) is prepared to invest heavily in this race. However, before the general election, Republicans must navigate a contentious primary involving several candidates, including Representatives Buddy Carter and Mike Collins, former University of Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley, and horse trainer Reagan Box. The absence of a strong candidate like Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, who opted not to enter the race, has left the field wide open for GOP contenders.

In North Carolina, the political landscape has shifted dramatically following the retirement of Senator Thom Tillis, a Republican. This previously secure seat is now an open contest, with Democrats eyeing a potential flip for the first time since 2008. Former North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper is seen as a key figure who could help Democrats secure a crucial victory. On the Republican side, former Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley is the preferred candidate, but he faces a primary challenge from Michele Morrow.

Michigan also presents an intriguing dynamic, as Democrats lost incumbent Senator Gary Peters to retirement. Both parties are now vying for the open seat, but Democrats must first navigate a crowded primary featuring candidates like Representative Haley Stevens, state Senator Mallory McMorrow, and physician Abdul El-Sayed. The Republican establishment is rallying behind former Representative Mike Rogers, who narrowly lost to Senator Elissa Slotkin in the previous election.

In Maine, incumbent Senator Susan Collins is a top target for Senate Democrats. Collins is seeking a sixth term, and she may face a formidable opponent backed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. Potential challengers include popular Democratic Governor Janet Mills and progressive candidate Graham Platner, who has garnered support from prominent figures like Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Ohio’s political landscape is also shifting, with Senator Jon Husted, a Republican, appointed to fill the seat vacated by Vice President JD Vance. Husted will face a tough challenge from former Senator Sherrod Brown, a Democrat who narrowly lost in the last election. This race is expected to attract significant financial backing from both parties as they vie for control in a state that has seen fluctuating political allegiances.

The retirement of Senator Jeanne Shaheen in New Hampshire has opened the door for several Republican candidates, including former Senator John Sununu and former Representative Scott Brown. On the Democratic side, Representative Chris Pappas is positioned as the likely candidate to succeed Shaheen.

Control of the House of Representatives is anticipated to hinge on fewer than two dozen competitive districts nationwide. Both parties are focusing their resources on these battlegrounds, which span suburban, rural, and diverse metropolitan areas, reflecting the varied paths to a majority.

In Colorado’s 8th District, Republican Representative Gabe Evans is defending a seat that has proven to be highly competitive. This district, drawn as a swing seat after redistricting, has flipped parties in consecutive election cycles and is often decided by narrow margins. The outcome here could signal momentum for either party heading into other critical House races.

Iowa’s 1st District is another key battleground, with Republican Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks seeking re-election. This district encompasses college towns, rural areas, and small manufacturing hubs, creating an electorate that frequently splits its ticket. Despite Iowa trending Republican at the presidential level, this seat remains a toss-up and is often among the last to be decided on election night.

New Jersey’s 7th District, held by Republican Representative Tom Kean Jr., is characterized by its high-income, college-educated suburban population. This district has historically swung with the national political climate, and its outcome could provide early insights into how suburban voters are responding to the current administration.

In New York’s 17th District, which previously supported President Joe Biden, Republican Representative Mike Lawler is expected to play a significant role in determining House control. The district will likely attract heavy national spending and messaging efforts from Democrats aiming to flip the seat.

Pennsylvania’s 7th District, represented by Republican Chris Mackenzie, is another must-win for both parties. This politically diverse area has mirrored statewide results in the past, and economic pressures and immigration debates are expected to shape voter sentiment.

California’s 22nd District, represented by Republican David Valadao, has been a battleground for over a decade, influenced by its agricultural economy and a large Latino electorate. The outcome here will depend on whether Democrats can mobilize enough turnout to flip the seat, especially in light of ongoing Republican gains in other parts of the country.

As the 2026 midterm elections draw closer, the stakes are high for both parties, with control of Congress hanging in the balance. The races in Georgia, North Carolina, Michigan, and other key districts will be critical in shaping the political landscape for years to come, according to Fox News.

Maduro States Venezuela Is Prepared to Negotiate Drug and Oil Deals with US

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro expressed his government’s willingness to negotiate a drug trafficking agreement with the U.S. amid ongoing military pressure targeting his administration’s drug networks.

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro announced on Thursday that his government is prepared to engage in negotiations with the United States regarding a potential drug trafficking agreement. This statement follows months of intensified American military pressure aimed at dismantling drug trafficking networks associated with his administration.

In a pre-recorded interview with Spanish journalist Ignacio Ramonet, which aired on state television, Maduro emphasized that Venezuela is “ready” to discuss a drug-trafficking deal. He urged both nations to “start talking seriously, with data in hand.” He added, “The U.S. government knows, because we’ve told many of their spokespeople, that if they want to seriously discuss an agreement to combat drug trafficking, we’re ready.”

Maduro further indicated that if the U.S. seeks oil, Venezuela is open to U.S. investment, referencing Chevron as the only major American oil company currently exporting Venezuelan crude to the United States. “Whenever they want it, wherever they want it and however they want it,” he stated.

Despite this overture, Maduro accused the U.S. of pursuing regime change in Venezuela and attempting to gain access to the country’s vast oil reserves through a prolonged pressure campaign. This campaign has included a significant military deployment to the Caribbean Sea that began in August.

He asserted that the U.S. aims “to impose themselves through threats, intimidation and force.” The interview was recorded on New Year’s Eve, coinciding with a U.S. military announcement regarding a kinetic strike that resulted in the deaths of five individuals aboard two vessels linked to designated terrorist organizations involved in narcotics trafficking.

Since the U.S. initiated airstrikes against alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific in early September, at least 114 people have reportedly lost their lives. There are indications that the U.S. may be considering an expansion of its campaign focused on Venezuela, which could include potential ground operations.

President Donald Trump confirmed that a recent strike targeted what he described as a Venezuelan port utilized for drug trafficking. However, he did not clarify whether the operation was conducted by the U.S. military or another entity, such as the CIA.

Maduro refrained from commenting on the specifics of that strike during the interview but mentioned he could “talk about it in a few days.” In recent weeks, Trump has escalated pressure on Maduro by ordering a total blockade of oil tankers entering or leaving Venezuela and designating his regime as a foreign terrorist organization. The U.S. has accused Maduro’s government of utilizing stolen American assets to fund terrorism, drug trafficking, and other criminal activities.

Additionally, U.S. authorities have seized two ships carrying oil that was under sanctions. The ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela continue to evolve, with both sides seemingly at an impasse despite Maduro’s recent overtures for negotiation.

According to Fox News Digital, the situation remains fluid as both nations navigate the complexities of their relationship amidst military and economic pressures.

H-1B Visa Delays Prompt Amazon to Adjust Policies for Indian Employees

Amazon has temporarily relaxed its return-to-office rules for employees stranded in India due to H-1B visa delays, allowing them to work remotely until early March.

Amazon has announced a temporary relaxation of its return-to-office policy for a select group of employees who are currently unable to return to the United States due to visa backlogs. This decision comes amid increasing scrutiny of U.S. immigration policies, particularly affecting H-1B visa holders.

According to an internal memo obtained by Business Insider, the company is permitting employees stuck in India because of visa delays to continue working remotely from their home country until early March. This adjustment provides short-term relief for those affected workers who had anticipated returning to the U.S. on schedule. Despite this exception, Amazon is continuing to enforce stricter in-office attendance requirements for its workforce.

The memo indicates that this temporary measure is specifically designed to address the disruptions caused by immigration issues and does not represent a broader change in Amazon’s remote work policy. Employees who qualify for this arrangement are, however, subject to significant restrictions. They are prohibited from writing code, participating in strategic decision-making, or engaging directly with customers during this period.

Amazon is not the only company grappling with the repercussions of visa delays. Many organizations across corporate America are adjusting to the rapid changes implemented during the Trump administration regarding the H-1B visa program. One of the most impactful changes has been the requirement for consular officers to scrutinize visa applicants’ social media activity before granting approval, which has significantly slowed processing times.

As a result, U.S. embassies and consulates in various countries have postponed visa appointments by several months. This situation has left many employees stranded abroad longer than anticipated, forcing employers to find creative solutions to maintain productivity.

The implications of these delays extend beyond Amazon. In recent weeks, major U.S. companies such as Google, Apple, and Microsoft have issued internal travel advisories. These advisories caution visa-holding employees against international travel, reflecting concerns that routine trips could lead to extended absences due to ongoing visa renewal and reentry delays.

Under Amazon’s standard policy, employees traveling overseas for visa renewals are allowed to work remotely for up to 20 business days. This is a limited exception to the company’s general requirement for employees to be in the office five days a week. However, the new guidance expands this allowance significantly.

According to the memo posted on Amazon’s internal HR portal on December 17, any employee who was in India as of December 13 and is awaiting a rescheduled visa appointment can continue to work remotely until March 2. This temporary extension highlights how immigration delays are compelling even the most office-centric companies to adapt their policies.

As the situation evolves, it remains to be seen how companies will continue to navigate the complexities of immigration and work policies in a changing landscape.

For further details, refer to Business Insider.

Socialist Indian-American Mayor Mamdani Inaugurated with Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez

Socialist Zohran Mamdani was inaugurated as New York City’s mayor on New Year’s Day, marking a significant shift in the city’s political landscape.

Zohran Mamdani, a 34-year-old socialist, has officially taken office as the mayor of New York City after a historic inauguration ceremony held on New Year’s Day. Mamdani was sworn in at midnight by New York Attorney General Letitia James, making him the first Muslim mayor of the city. He used a Quran during the ceremony, a symbolic gesture that highlights his commitment to his faith and community.

The public inauguration took place at 1 p.m. on January 1, where Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., administered the oath of office once again. In a statement, Sanders praised Mamdani, stating, “At a moment when democracy is under attack and cynicism about our politics runs deep, Zohran Mamdani represents a new generation of progressive leadership rooted in courage, integrity, and solidarity.”

Progressive Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a staunch supporter of Mamdani, delivered the opening remarks at the inauguration. The event was open to all New Yorkers, with Mamdani’s transition team announcing a “huge inaugural block party” to follow the ceremony. This celebration took place on Broadway along the Canyon of Heroes, a fitting backdrop for the new mayor’s ambitious vision for the city.

Mamdani’s election in November was marked by a campaign that focused heavily on affordability and social equity. He successfully overcame criticism regarding his anti-Israel statements and his socialist policies, which include proposals to freeze rent, establish city-run grocery stores, and rethink policing and property ownership. His victory speech resonated with many New Yorkers, as he addressed the struggles of working-class citizens.

“For as long as we can remember, the working people of New York have been told by the wealthy and the well-connected that power does not belong in their hands,” Mamdani said in his victory speech. “Fingers bruised from lifting boxes on the warehouse floor, palms calloused from delivery bike handlebars, knuckles scarred with kitchen burns: these are not hands that have been allowed to hold power. And yet, over the last 12 months, you have dared to reach for something greater.”

He concluded his speech with a powerful message of hope and determination: “Tonight, against all odds, we have grasped it. The future is in our hands. My friends, we have toppled a political dynasty.”

Mamdani’s inauguration signals a significant shift in New York City’s political landscape, as he represents a new wave of progressive leadership. His administration will undoubtedly face challenges, including pressure to address issues such as the influx of illicit Chinese vapes into the city and the ongoing housing crisis.

As Mamdani embarks on his term, the eyes of New Yorkers and political observers alike will be on his actions and policies, which could reshape the city for years to come. His commitment to addressing the needs of working-class citizens and advocating for progressive reforms will be key to his success as mayor.

According to Fox News, Mamdani’s inauguration marks a pivotal moment for the city, reflecting a broader trend of socialist candidates gaining traction in American politics.

Nalin Haley Criticizes Vivek Ramaswamy’s Nuclear Energy Stance

Nalin Haley, son of former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley, intensifies his feud with Vivek Ramaswamy, accusing the Ohio gubernatorial candidate of political opportunism and dishonesty.

Nalin Haley, the son of former South Carolina governor and GOP presidential candidate Nikki Haley, has launched a fierce attack on Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy. This latest confrontation, which took place on December 30, is part of an ongoing public feud that originated during the contentious Republican presidential primary.

The catalyst for Nalin Haley’s outburst was a post from Ramaswamy on social media platform X, where he cautioned critics against spreading what he termed “defamatory claims” regarding his business history. Ramaswamy’s message included a veiled warning: “(Friendly note to those trying to push defamatory lies: save your records & don’t delete them).”

Within hours, Nalin Haley responded with a personal and scathing retort, accusing Ramaswamy of political opportunism and dishonesty. He claimed that Ramaswamy had previously sought his mother’s support, alleging that Ramaswamy reached out to Nikki Haley in 2021 for her endorsement of his book and later sought her advice on his gubernatorial ambitions.

“My Mom would never say this cuz she’s too nice… but I’m not so I will,” Nalin Haley stated, suggesting that Ramaswamy’s presidential campaign was insincere and merely a means to gain his mother’s endorsement. “He was a total fangirl before the grift,” he added, implying that Ramaswamy’s motives were self-serving.

The younger Haley went on to describe Ramaswamy’s presidential campaign as “fraudulent,” asserting that it was merely a stepping stone to his current gubernatorial aspirations. He also accused Ramaswamy of threatening legal action to silence critics, further escalating the tone of their exchange.

This sharp rhetoric is indicative of more than just a spontaneous online spat; it reflects a deeper, unresolved rivalry between the Haley and Ramaswamy factions that dates back to the 2024 Republican primary. During that campaign, both Nikki Haley and Ramaswamy vied for the party’s nomination, frequently clashing over key issues such as foreign policy and immigration.

Nikki Haley positioned herself as a traditional conservative with a strong focus on national security, while Ramaswamy presented himself as a populist outsider closely aligned with former President Donald Trump and the MAGA movement. Their rivalry was characterized by pointed exchanges during debates and contrasting appeals to Republican voters.

Nalin Haley has increasingly taken on the role of a public surrogate for his mother, using social media to defend her record and counter attacks from rival factions within the party. His latest comments suggest lingering resentment over Ramaswamy’s rise in the political arena, as well as concerns among Haley allies regarding what they perceive as Ramaswamy’s ideological inconsistency and political maneuvering.

Ramaswamy, who has not directly responded to Nalin Haley’s accusations, is currently facing scrutiny over his business history and political ambitions as he transitions from a failed presidential bid to a high-profile gubernatorial campaign in Ohio. His December 30 tweet warning critics to preserve records has been interpreted as a potential precursor to legal action against those who continue to challenge him.

This incident highlights how unresolved tensions from the 2024 Republican primary continue to influence intra-party dynamics, particularly as former presidential contenders reposition themselves for future races. It also underscores the increasing role of family members and informal surrogates in modern political conflicts, often engaging in battles with fewer constraints than the candidates themselves.

As the exchange unfolds, it remains to be seen whether Ramaswamy will act on his legal threats or if this feud will remain confined to the often tumultuous realm of social media.

The ongoing conflict illustrates the complexities of political rivalries and the personal stakes involved, particularly as candidates and their families navigate the challenging landscape of American politics. This saga is far from over, and both sides appear prepared for a prolonged engagement.

According to The American Bazaar, the dynamics of this feud will likely continue to evolve as both Nalin Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy seek to solidify their positions within the Republican Party.

Trump and Zelenskyy Discuss Near Completion of Ukraine Peace Deal

U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed optimism about nearing a peace deal for Ukraine following talks in Florida, despite unresolved complex issues.

U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced on Sunday that negotiations aimed at ending the war in Ukraine are progressing towards a potential breakthrough. This statement followed high-level discussions held at Mar-a-Lago, where both leaders acknowledged that several complex and politically sensitive issues remain unresolved.

After their meeting, Trump and Zelenskyy spoke to reporters about what they described as significant progress on a proposed 20-point peace framework. This framework has emerged from weeks of intensive diplomacy involving the United States, Ukraine, European Union members, and NATO officials. While much of the framework appears to be agreed upon, key disagreements over territorial status, ceasefire guarantees, and the process for Ukrainian domestic approval continue to present major challenges.

“We could be very close,” Trump stated, conveying a sense of cautious optimism. “There are one or two very thorny issues, very tough issues. But I think we’re doing very well. We made a lot of progress today, but really, we’ve made it over the last month. This is not a one-day process. It’s very complicated stuff.”

Zelenskyy echoed Trump’s sentiments, noting that negotiators have largely converged on the structure of a deal following sustained engagement across multiple international venues. He highlighted that discussions have taken place over several weeks in cities such as Geneva, Miami, Berlin, and Palm Beach. American and Ukrainian teams have been working closely together to refine a shared peace framework.

<p“We discussed all the aspects of the peace framework, which includes — and we have great achievements — a 20-point peace plan, 90 percent agreed,” Zelenskyy said. He underscored what he described as unprecedented alignment between Kyiv and Washington at this stage of the conflict.

Both leaders confirmed the involvement of European and NATO officials in the negotiations. Following their meeting in Florida, Trump and Zelenskyy participated in a joint call with senior European leaders and international partners, reinforcing the multilateral nature of the peace effort.

Zelenskyy mentioned that negotiating teams are expected to reconvene in the coming weeks to address the remaining disputes. He also noted that Trump has expressed a willingness to host additional talks in Washington involving European leaders and a Ukrainian delegation, indicating continued U.S. engagement at the highest level.

Despite the progress made, the status of territory—particularly the Donbas region—remains one of the most contentious issues. Both Trump and Zelenskyy acknowledged that Ukraine and Russia hold sharply differing positions, making compromise politically and diplomatically challenging.

Trump cautioned that time could work against Ukraine if fighting continues without a settlement. “Some of that land has been taken,” he said. “Some of that land is maybe up for grabs, but it may be taken over the next period of a number of months. Are you better off making a deal now?” His remarks suggested a sense of urgency in Washington to prevent further battlefield losses from influencing the final terms of any agreement.

In contrast, Zelenskyy emphasized that territorial questions cannot be resolved by executive decision alone. He stated that any final agreement must comply with Ukrainian law and reflect the will of the Ukrainian people, which could require parliamentary approval or even a national referendum.

“Our society, too, has to choose and decide who has to vote, because it’s their land—the land not of one person,” Zelenskyy remarked. “It’s the land of our nation for a lot of generations.”

Trump framed his push for a deal in humanitarian terms, citing what he described as overwhelming public support for ending the conflict and the staggering human toll of the war. “We want to see it ended,” he said. “I want it ended because I don’t want to see so many people dying. We’re losing massive numbers of people—the biggest by far since World War II.”

Analysts suggest that the convergence of diplomatic momentum, public fatigue with the war, and intensifying battlefield pressures may be driving the renewed urgency on all sides. However, they caution that the remaining disputes—particularly over sovereignty, security guarantees, and enforcement mechanisms—are precisely the issues that have derailed past peace efforts.

While neither leader provided a definitive timeline, Sunday’s statements marked one of the most optimistic assessments of peace prospects since the war began. The emphasis on a nearly agreed 20-point plan, coupled with ongoing multilateral involvement, suggests that negotiators believe a framework is within reach—if the final obstacles can be bridged.

For now, the talks remain delicately poised between breakthrough and breakdown. As Trump noted, progress has been substantial, but the final steps will require resolving questions that strike at the heart of Ukraine’s sovereignty and the future security architecture of Europe, according to Global Net News.

A Goan Memory: Preserving Indian-American Heritage Through Stories

Returning to Goa in September 2025 evoked a vivid tapestry of memories, blending family connections with the enchanting beauty of this coastal paradise.

Goa has a way of slipping under your skin. When we returned in September 2025, it felt like stepping into a beautifully illustrated scrapbook. We stayed at Taj Exotica in Benaulim, my son’s honeymoon destination, where the Portuguese-style façade was washed in whites and blues, and the hallways were adorned with Mario Miranda’s whimsical sketches. A violinist drifted through breakfast, filling the air with the soothing melodies of Schubert.

Our seaside cottage was nestled between swaying palms and hibiscus. Each morning began with tender coconut water on our tiny veranda, where we watched a procession of white geese waddle past the vibrant Mexican petunias. Blue-tailed kingfishers darted over the lawns while oriental magpie-robins played among the birds-of-paradise. At the beachside café, breakfast lingered long past noon, featuring crisp dosas, soft ghee idlis, and Punjabi kadi with the perfect sour taste. There was sourdough toast with freshly churned butter, apricot spread, and tangy marmalade, along with an array of chutneys made from aromatic herbs. The pastries were so delicate they barely survived the short journey from platter to plate. And always, the Goan staples: coconut-rich fish curry, green chilies hidden in creamy cashew gravies, and railway-style cutlets fragrant with the nostalgia of train journeys.

In the evening, we lit oil lamps and blew a conch shell, embracing the slow, deliberate pace of life that mirrored the tides.

Yet, for all the pleasures of this breezy paradise, there was a deeper tug—a memory of the jacuzzi at the Kerala temple Spa Jiva, where my mother once sat with my daughter, and the pool where their nanaji had splashed with her and her brother. I could still hear her calling out, “Mom, look—look at me!” We recalled how we had all stopped Dad from buying a pound of cashews at the Goa airport, fearing it would send his blood sugar soaring, even as he looked at them wistfully, saying, “It would be nice to have some at home for guests.”

Every day, my daughter tugged at my arm with a soft urgency, insisting, “We HAVE to go back to Fort Aguada!” It had been years, but that night—New Year’s Eve at Fort Aguada—was etched in all our memories: terracotta lanterns, music, sea breeze, and one of India’s most unforgettable voices rising over the Arabian Sea.

So, one afternoon, we set off from South Goa to North Goa to revisit that cherished memory from New Year’s Eve, some 25 years ago.

Dad, in his sunhat, looked debonair; Mom, in Christian Dior shades, channeled old-Hollywood glamour. My sister, camera poised like a National Geographic photographer on assignment, captured our gloriously chaotic, curious children.

Fort Aguada had only grown lovelier in our absence. The Arabian Sea glittered as palm trees beckoned, and fishermen waved from their bobbing boats as though they had been waiting all year for us. The aromas drifting from the beach shacks—grilled prawns, garlic bread, and curries cooked in coconut oil—were irresistible. We settled on the emerald lawn beneath a canopy of glowing lanterns, ready for an al fresco indulgence. Our servers brought out one Goan masterpiece after another: chicken xacuti, Goan fish curry (Xitti Kodi), and soft Neer dosa to scoop it all up. Dessert included Bebinca, the multi-layered “queen of Goan sweets,” and dodol, the sticky, Christmas-scented delight infused with jaggery, coconut milk, and cashew.

After our feast, we made our way toward the ancient fort.

Fort Aguada rose before us, its laterite bricks glowing like embers. Built in the early 17th century, it had withstood monsoons, invaders, and centuries of sun. Lanterns swung like fireflies above the lawns and walls, warm beneath our palms, as if they held stories of the past.

My mother, regal in her navy silk georgette with a fresh orchid tucked into her braid, looked like she belonged in a sepia photograph. Our children tore across the ramparts, making royal proclamations.

My father slipped into his favorite role as resident historian, sharing tales of the fort built in 1612, its freshwater supply station, and its role as a bulwark against the Dutch and Marathas, home to one of Asia’s oldest lighthouses.

As the sun sank into the Arabian Sea, Dad inhaled deeply, stretching his arms toward the horizon, and proclaimed, “A million-dollar breeze is blowing—let us stop talking!” He closed his eyes like a mystic communing with the elements.

Then the music began. A soft hum reverberated in the air, and a voice—a deep, velvety contralto—unfurled across the fort.

Mom froze mid-step. Dad blinked, stunned. My sister clutched her camera and mouthed, “NO WAY.”

The legendary Usha Uthup emerged in the evening glow. Her sari shimmered, and her eyes sparkled below her signature giant bindi. Unmistakably charismatic, she seemed larger than life—yet warm enough to make the night feel intimate.

In seconds, the resort transformed from a historic monument into an open-air concert hall. Usha’s bold and fearless voice filled the night as she swung effortlessly from “Hari Om Hari” to “Auva Auva,” each note infused with her trademark exuberance. People who had been calmly sipping their drinks moments earlier were suddenly transformed—arms in the air, hips swaying. With a flourish fit for a Bollywood finale, she launched into “Bambai Se Aaya Mera Dost.”

The crowd erupted. My children whirled like electrified gremlins. Dad unleashed dance moves unseen since the 1980s. Mom clapped with abandon. My sister shrieked, “THIS IS HISTORY!” as she recorded every second.

I laughed until tears blurred my vision. Usha wasn’t just singing; she was summoning joy.

At midnight, the sky erupted, illuminating Usha Uthup like a goddess of music. Behind her, waves crashed in perfect theatrical timing. We hugged one another, sticky with dessert, breathless with laughter, wrapped in that rare, magical feeling that we were exactly where we were meant to be.

Some memories glow because the night was extraordinary. Others glow because the people in them were. That New Year’s Eve had both.

According to India Currents.

Putin Residence Drone Attack Called ‘Implausible’ Amid Ukraine Accusations

Claims of a drone attack on President Putin’s residence have been dismissed as implausible by a drone expert, raising questions about the credibility of Russia’s accusations against Ukraine.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s residence has allegedly been targeted by Ukrainian drones, but a leading military drone expert has labeled these claims as lacking credibility due to tactical impossibilities.

Cameron Chell, CEO and co-founder of Draganfly, a drone manufacturer that supplies the U.S. Department of Defense and allied militaries, including Ukraine, expressed skepticism regarding the accusations. He described the alleged attack as “hard to fathom” and tactically implausible.

As Moscow intensified its allegations, Kyiv firmly denied any involvement in the purported drone strike. Chell emphasized that the claims contradict Ukraine’s established drone tactics, which are known for their cleverness and efficiency.

“What really makes things usually very signature about Ukraine is that they’re always incredibly clever about how they use drones,” Chell told Fox News Digital. “They are clever from a cost perspective — let’s call it an efficiency perspective — but also very clever in their tactics,” he added.

Chell further stated, “I find it hard to fathom that this drone attack even happened on Putin’s residence or that it was something that Ukraine orchestrated for a number of reasons.” He noted that for a drone to reach Putin’s residence, it would need to be launched from a relatively close location.

On Tuesday, Russia reiterated its claims that Ukraine attempted to strike a presidential palace in the Novgorod region using drones, allegedly to disrupt ongoing peace efforts. Kyiv dismissed these allegations, particularly given the timing, which coincided with a recent positive meeting between former President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Florida.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed late Monday that 91 drones were intercepted while en route to Putin’s residence on the shores of Lake Valdai. This statement appeared to contradict earlier reports from the Defense Ministry, which indicated that 89 drones had been shot down across eight regions, including 18 over Novgorod, with additional claims of 23 more drones later added to the tally. Lavrov’s comments also included an assertion that 49 drones intercepted over Bryansk, nearly 300 miles away, were also targeting Valdai.

When asked about the wreckage from the alleged attack, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated it was “a matter for our military,” while dismissing Zelenskyy’s denial and Western skepticism as “completely insane.” Peskov indicated that Russia’s diplomatic stance would be hardened, and Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin warned that there could be “no forgiveness” for Zelenskyy.

Chell reiterated that the narrative surrounding the alleged attack does not hold up under scrutiny. “To attack Putin’s residence, you need long-range, very fast-moving drones,” he explained. He added that for smaller drones to reach such a secure location, they would have to be launched from a much closer distance, likely within Russia itself.

“They would have to be within about 10 kilometers [6.2 miles] — or maybe, at most, 30 kilometers — of Putin’s residence,” Chell noted. He emphasized that the facility where Putin resides is highly secure, making it unlikely for lower-cost, slower-moving drones to successfully approach it.

Moreover, Chell pointed out that Ukraine typically does not announce its drone operations in advance. He also highlighted the challenges of conducting night operations, which would complicate the use of GPS or AI-based navigation due to jamming and visibility issues. “Apparently, the thing was at night, so that’s very difficult for machine vision or AI mapping software,” he said. “It definitely wasn’t using GPS, because it would have been jammed. There are just a bunch of things that don’t add up.”

From a political standpoint, Chell argued that Ukraine has little to gain from such an attack. “They’re bold, but right in the middle of peace talks — when they need Trump on side — it makes no sense,” he stated. “Ukraine is just politically too smart to have done that.”

On Monday, Zelenskyy also dismissed the claims as a complete fabrication, accusing Moscow of laying the groundwork for further attacks. Lavrov warned of potential retaliation but affirmed that Russia would continue its talks with Washington.

Trump mentioned that he learned of the alleged attack directly from Putin and expressed his anger over the situation. When asked about the evidence, he replied, “We’ll find out.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to the Kremlin for further comment on the matter.

According to Fox News, the unfolding situation continues to raise questions about the credibility of Russia’s claims and the implications for ongoing peace negotiations.

Trump Considers Lawsuit Against Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell

Former President Donald Trump has threatened to sue Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, citing “gross incompetence” related to the cost of renovations at the central bank’s headquarters.

Former President Donald Trump has expressed strong dissatisfaction with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, indicating he is considering legal action against Powell for what he describes as “gross incompetence.” This remark came during a press conference alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, where Trump voiced his concerns about the ongoing renovations at the Federal Reserve’s headquarters.

“We’re thinking about bringing a suit against Powell for incompetence. Because think of it, these aren’t outstanding buildings. These are small buildings,” Trump stated. He further criticized Powell’s management of the construction project, asserting, “It’s gross incompetence against Powell. And it was his baby. And the guy’s just incompetent. There’s nothing you can do about it.”

This is not the first time Trump has threatened legal action against Powell. Earlier in the year, he hinted at a potential lawsuit but did not elaborate on the specifics at that time. Trump has been particularly vocal about the rising costs associated with the Federal Reserve’s renovations, claiming that Powell has allowed expenses to spiral out of control.

During the press conference, Trump also expressed a desire to dismiss Powell, saying, “I would fire him. I’d love to fire him. But we’re so close, you know. But maybe I still might.”

In addition to his criticisms regarding the renovations, Trump has been vocal about his discontent with the Federal Reserve’s monetary policies, especially its decisions on interest rates. He has suggested that Powell should either resign or be removed from his position. Throughout 2025, Trump has consistently targeted Powell and the Federal Reserve, accusing them of mismanaging the economy and overspending on various projects.

Jerome Powell has played a pivotal role in shaping U.S. monetary policy, including setting interest rates and managing responses to economic crises, such as inflation spikes and financial disruptions. Known for his pragmatic and cautious approach, Powell strives to balance economic growth with inflation control while maintaining the Federal Reserve’s independence from political pressures.

The ongoing tensions between Trump and Powell underscore the inherent challenges in the relationship between the executive branch and the nation’s central bank. The Federal Reserve operates with a significant degree of independence to effectively manage monetary policy, yet it often faces intense political scrutiny, particularly during periods of economic uncertainty.

While disagreements between the president and the Federal Reserve are not uncommon, the public nature of Trump’s criticisms highlights the complexities of aligning political priorities with long-term economic stability. Powell’s responsibilities involve making decisions that may be unpopular in the short term but are essential for the overall health of the economy.

Navigating interest rates, inflation, and other macroeconomic indicators requires complex judgment calls, often made under conditions of significant uncertainty. Although the president may express dissatisfaction with the outcomes of these decisions, the Fed’s independence is crucial for maintaining credibility in financial markets and ensuring the integrity of U.S. economic policy.

The scrutiny surrounding high-profile projects, such as the renovations of Federal Reserve buildings, also illustrates the symbolic importance of federal institutions and the expectation for efficient management of public resources. How leaders respond to criticism—both internally and publicly—can significantly influence perceptions of competence and institutional trust.

As the situation develops, it remains to be seen how Trump’s threats will impact the Federal Reserve’s operations and Powell’s leadership. The relationship between the executive branch and the central bank will continue to be a focal point of discussion as economic conditions evolve.

According to The American Bazaar, the tensions between Trump and Powell reflect broader challenges in U.S. economic governance.

Dr. Alice Mathew, 71, Wins Mrs. India 2025 Title

Dr. Alice Mathew, a 71-year-old retired professor from Kerala, has been crowned “Mrs. India 2025 (Super Classic),” challenging age stereotypes and inspiring women across the nation.

In a powerful statement against age stereotypes and societal limitations, Dr. Alice Mathew, a 71-year-old retired professor originally from Kerala, has been crowned “Mrs. India 2025 (Super Classic)” at a national beauty pageant held in Jaipur. Her victory has resonated far beyond the stage, inspiring conversations across India about lifelong ambition, women’s empowerment, and redefining success at every age.

The prestigious Mrs. India 2025 competition took place from December 18 to 21 at the regal Jai Bagh Palace in Jaipur, bringing together women from across the country to celebrate confidence, purpose, and individuality. Dr. Mathew’s triumph in the “Super Classic” category—reserved for women above 60—has been widely hailed as a milestone moment in Indian pageantry.

Organised by Mrs. India.net, the four-day event featured nearly 40 contestants competing across multiple rounds, including talent showcases, personal interviews, and evening wear presentations. Unlike conventional beauty contests, the platform emphasises life experience, leadership, and social impact alongside grace and presentation.

“Our platform is dedicated to showcasing the beauty, strength, and stories of married women, regardless of age, size, or background,” said Deepali Phadnis, founder and director of Mrs. India.net. “Dr. Alice Mathew’s win is a powerful reminder that women do not have an expiry date on dreams. Her presence on stage embodied confidence, wisdom, and inspiration.”

The “Super Classic” category was designed specifically to honour women who continue to grow, contribute, and inspire well into their later years.

Dr. Alice Mathew hails from Kottayam, Kerala, and spent several decades in the United States pursuing an accomplished academic career. She retired as a professor from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), where she was known not only for her academic contributions but also for mentoring students from diverse backgrounds.

After retirement, Dr. Mathew returned to Kerala and now resides with her husband at St. Matthews Home in Kallara, near Kottayam. Rather than slowing down, she reinvented herself as a motivational speaker and digital content creator, using platforms such as YouTube to encourage older women to embrace active, joyful, and purpose-driven lives.

“Winning Mrs. India 2025 is not just a personal triumph,” Dr. Mathew said after receiving the crown. “I want every woman—especially those who feel their best years are behind them—to know that new beginnings are always possible. Age is just a number; what truly matters is our spirit, confidence, and determination.”

Dr. Mathew’s win has struck a chord in a society where beauty and achievement are often narrowly associated with youth. Her poised stage presence, articulate responses, and calm confidence impressed both judges and audiences, prompting widespread admiration.

“Dr. Mathew’s journey challenged our assumptions in the most beautiful way,” said Phadnis. “She reminded everyone that ambition does not fade with age—it matures.”

Social media platforms were flooded with congratulatory messages, with many users calling her a role model for women across generations. Women’s groups in Kerala described her achievement as a landmark moment for lifelong learning and self-expression, while fellow contestants praised her humility and perseverance throughout the competition.

Founded over a decade ago, Mrs. India.net has steadily expanded its vision, moving away from traditional pageant norms toward more inclusive representations of womanhood. By introducing categories for different age groups and life stages, the platform reflects a broader cultural shift in India—one that values experience, resilience, and contribution alongside appearance.

Experts say Dr. Mathew’s victory underscores this transformation. “Pageants like Mrs. India are no longer about fitting into a mould,” said a senior organiser. “They are about breaking it.”

For Dr. Alice Mathew, the crown represents responsibility as much as recognition. She hopes her story will encourage women to step beyond fear, self-doubt, and societal expectations.

“Every phase of life has its own beauty,” she said. “If my journey encourages even one woman to believe in herself again, then this title has served its true purpose.”

As her story continues to inspire audiences nationwide, Dr. Mathew’s achievement stands as a reminder that growth, confidence, and contribution have no age limit—and that it is never too late to shine, according to Global Net News.

Orlando Health Sciences University Renamed After Indian-American Philanthropists

Orlando Health Sciences University has been renamed Drs. Kiran and Pallavi Patel Global University, reflecting a commitment to global medical education and honoring the Patels’ philanthropic contributions.

In a significant development for medical education and global philanthropy, Orlando Health Sciences University in Florida has officially been renamed Drs. Kiran and Pallavi Patel Global University (KPGU). This historic change honors the remarkable contributions of Dr. Kiran C. Patel and Dr. Pallavi Patel, whose lifelong dedication to healthcare, education, and service has transformed medical training across continents.

University leaders assert that this renaming is more than a symbolic gesture; it represents a pivotal step in establishing the institution as a globally connected hub for health sciences education, research, and clinical excellence. This initiative aims to serve Central Florida while extending its reach worldwide.

“Drs. Kiran and Pallavi Patel embody the spirit of service and visionary leadership that is foundational to our institution,” said Chad Toujague, chair of the KPGU Board. “By carrying their name, we honor their legacy as the most significant philanthropists in the osteopathic profession and reaffirm our commitment to the highest standards of education and patient care for generations to come.”

The university’s new identity reflects an expanded ambition to evolve into a world-class medical and health sciences university with a robust global footprint. According to academic leaders, the Patels’ philanthropic support has accelerated the institution’s growth at a critical moment in its development.

“Naming the university after Drs. Kiran and Pallavi Patel reflects our advancement toward becoming a world-class health professional university,” said Robert T. Hasty, DO, dean of the Orlando College of Osteopathic Medicine (OCOM) and chief academic officer of KPGU. “With their significant contributions, KPGU is poised to develop into a truly global university whose impact will continue to grow in perpetuity.”

OCOM will remain a core academic pillar within KPGU, focusing on training future physicians grounded in osteopathic principles, innovation, and compassionate care.

For Dr. Kiran Patel and Dr. Pallavi Patel, the renaming is both an honor and a reaffirmation of their belief in education as a transformative force. “My wife, Pallavi, and I are profoundly honored by this recognition,” Dr. Patel stated. “Our commitment to the osteopathic profession and to the Central Florida community—and beyond—is immense.”

He emphasized the global scale of their educational efforts, noting that Patel Institutes in India and the United States currently graduate more than 1,000 physicians each year. “This scale mandates a cohesive and collaborative partnership between our Indian university and the newly established KPGU in the United States,” he said. “KPGU represents a bold global vision for healthcare education and will set a new international standard for excellence.”

University leaders believe this cross-continental model will prepare physicians to address diverse medical challenges, from non-communicable diseases to global public health crises.

KPGU’s leadership has outlined an ambitious long-term outlook, linking medical education to global demographic realities. “Our university will be uniquely positioned to train physicians across multiple continents,” Dr. Patel explained. “This will better prepare them to tackle the wide variety of pathologies seen around the world.”

He added that with the global population projected to reach nearly 10 billion by 2076, Patel Institutes expect to have trained more than 50,000 physicians by that time—collectively impacting over one billion lives annually.

Closer to home, KPGU remains deeply invested in Central Florida. University officials have identified 2028 as a milestone year, when the first OCOM class is expected to graduate alongside the institution achieving full accreditation.

Few individuals have influenced medical education in Florida as profoundly as the Patels. In 2017, their $200 million gift to Nova Southeastern University became one of the largest educational donations in state history, leading to the creation of the Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine and the Dr. Pallavi Patel College of Health Care Sciences.

Their philanthropy also extends to the University of South Florida, where initiatives such as the Patel College of Global Sustainability and the Patel Charter School for Underprivileged Children reflect their commitment to long-term societal impact.

“It was important to create institutions that would exist in perpetuity,” Dr. Patel has said, “educating students and scholars who can dramatically change the world.”

Central to the Patels’ mission is expanding access to medical education for students from underserved regions. “A key goal is to train doctors who can return to their home countries and serve communities that lack adequate healthcare,” Dr. Patel has emphasized.

Through scholarships, global exchange programs, and clinical training opportunities, KPGU aims to attract students from the United States, India, Africa, and beyond. The Patels’ work also includes building a 120-acre university campus in India and supporting health and education initiatives in Zambia, Dr. Patel’s birthplace.

The renaming of Orlando Health Sciences University to Drs. Kiran and Pallavi Patel Global University marks a defining moment in the institution’s history. More than a tribute, it signals a future rooted in global collaboration, service-driven education, and transformative impact.

As KPGU embarks on this new chapter, university leaders and community stakeholders agree on one thing: the Patels’ legacy will continue to shape medical education—and lives—around the world, according to Global Net News.

Toronto Consulate Launches 24/7 Women’s Help Center for Indian-Americans

The Consulate General of India in Toronto has launched a 24/7 One Stop Center for Women to assist Indian women facing various forms of distress, including domestic violence and legal challenges.

TORONTO – The Consulate General of India in Toronto has established a dedicated One Stop Center for Women aimed at supporting Indian women in distress. This initiative addresses issues such as domestic violence, abuse, family conflict, abandonment, exploitation, and legal difficulties.

The center will operate from the Indian mission in Toronto, providing a comprehensive range of services tailored to the needs of affected women. In a statement, the Consulate emphasized that the facility will offer coordinated, beneficiary-centered assistance by connecting women with timely and appropriate support services.

Services available at the One Stop Center will include immediate counseling, access to psycho-social support, and coordination of legal assistance and advice. Additionally, the center will help women connect with relevant community and social service resources throughout Canada. The Consulate has assured that all interventions will be conducted in accordance with local Canadian laws.

The One Stop Center will be managed by a female administrator and will provide safe, dignified, and comprehensive assistance to women in need, based on a means-tested approach. Support will be accessible through a 24/7 helpline that facilitates prompt handling of distress calls. Counseling and emotional support will be provided through partnerships with empaneled non-governmental organizations.

Financial assistance, when extended, will also be subject to means testing in accordance with Government of India regulations, as stated by the Consulate.

This announcement comes in the wake of a tragic incident involving a 30-year-old Indian-origin woman, Himanshi Khurana, who was recently found murdered in Toronto. Canadian police have issued a nationwide arrest warrant for 32-year-old Abdul Ghafoori, a Toronto resident known to the victim, in connection with her death, according to local media reports citing law enforcement officials.

The establishment of the One Stop Center reflects the Consulate’s commitment to providing essential support to Indian women facing various challenges in Canada, ensuring they have access to the resources they need to navigate difficult circumstances.

According to India-West, the center is expected to play a crucial role in empowering women and fostering a safer environment for the Indian community in Toronto.

Eric Adams Accuses Biden DOJ of ‘Lawfare’ Similar to Trump’s Treatment

Outgoing New York City Mayor Eric Adams accused the Biden administration’s Justice Department of using “lawfare” against political opponents, drawing parallels to the treatment of former President Donald Trump.

Outgoing New York City Mayor Eric Adams has leveled serious accusations against the Biden administration’s Justice Department, claiming it has engaged in “lawfare” against political opponents, including himself and former President Donald Trump. During a recent appearance on Fox News’ “The Story,” Adams expressed his concerns regarding the treatment of individuals facing legal challenges under the current administration.

“I think what we have witnessed under President Biden’s Justice Department, Americans should never have to live through that again,” Adams stated. He referenced various incidents, including the scrutiny faced by everyday Americans advocating for their children’s education and the high-profile raid on Trump’s residence. “Debates should have happened… I think that you’re seeing the clear indication that the Justice Department under the previous administration used lawfare to go after those who disagree with them,” he added.

When asked if he felt angered by the alleged weaponization of the DOJ prior to being targeted himself, Adams responded, “Personal experience allows us to see firsthand the abuse.” He emphasized his long-standing commitment to fighting injustices, drawing from his extensive background as a police officer, state senator, and borough president. “There’s a real history, a rich history, of me standing up and fighting what the criminal justice system should never be,” he remarked.

Adams acknowledged that his anger regarding the situation predates his own legal troubles, but he noted that witnessing the events unfold during his tenure as mayor was particularly distressing. “What I saw happen while I was the mayor is really deplorable, and we saw what happened to President Trump’s family as well,” he said.

In September 2024, Adams was indicted on federal corruption charges, which included allegations of bribery, wire fraud, and accepting illegal foreign campaign contributions from Turkish officials and businessmen. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges and maintains that the case against him is politically motivated, stemming from his criticisms of the Biden administration’s handling of illegal immigration.

However, prosecutors in the Southern District of New York have stated in court filings that the investigation into Adams began in September 2021, prior to his public criticisms of the government’s immigration policies and his election as mayor. Earlier this year, the charges against Adams were dropped at the request of the Trump administration.

As Adams prepares to leave office at the end of the year, he will be succeeded by Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, who is set to be sworn in shortly after the new year.

According to Fox News, Adams’ comments reflect a broader concern among some political figures regarding the perceived misuse of legal mechanisms for political purposes.

Maryland Public Universities Experience Decline in International Student Enrollment

Maryland’s public universities are experiencing a significant decline in international student enrollment, attributed to visa uncertainties and changing U.S. immigration policies.

Maryland’s public universities are facing a notable decrease in international student enrollment this year, a trend that reflects growing concerns over visa uncertainties and shifts in U.S. immigration policies. University officials indicate that this decline underscores broader challenges in attracting and retaining international students.

According to WTOP News, Maryland’s public universities lost at least 449 international students between fall 2024 and fall 2025. Experts caution that the actual number may be even higher, highlighting the difficulties the state’s higher education system faces in maintaining its appeal to students from abroad.

Data from 11 of Maryland’s public universities reveal that international student enrollment fell from 7,608 in fall 2024 to 7,159 in fall 2025. Eight universities reported declines, losing a combined total of 569 students, while three institutions saw modest gains, adding 120 students overall.

International students now represent a smaller portion of the more than 118,000 students enrolled across these campuses, mirroring a broader trend of declining global student mobility.

The University of Maryland, College Park, experienced the most significant drop, with international enrollment decreasing from approximately 4,260 in fall 2024 to about 3,980 in fall 2025, a decline of nearly 300 students, or 6.7%. Notably, these figures exclude countries with fewer than five students, suggesting that the actual decrease could be even larger.

The University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) saw one of the largest percentage declines, losing over 200 international students, which represents a drop of roughly 23% from the previous year. While international undergraduate enrollment experienced a slight increase, incoming graduate students from abroad fell sharply by more than 230. University officials acknowledged the decline but emphasized their commitment to supporting international students amid evolving policy challenges.

Several other Maryland universities also reported declines in international enrollment. Frostburg State University saw a 15.2% drop, while Salisbury University’s numbers fell by 11%, or 10 students. Bowie State University, Towson University, and the University of Maryland, Baltimore each recorded decreases of less than 10 students.

St. Mary’s College of Maryland experienced the largest percentage decline at 80%, though this was due to a drop from just five international students in fall 2024 to one in fall 2025.

Experts cited by WTOP News attribute the decline to the Trump administration’s strict immigration measures, which included travel bans, paused visa interviews, visa revocations, and limited institutional support. While many previously revoked visas were eventually reinstated, ongoing uncertainty continues to concern prospective international students.

Rachel Banks, senior director of public policy and legislative strategy at NAFSA, noted that more students are now exploring alternative countries that appear more stable and welcoming for study. She also raised concerns about proposals to limit international students’ stay in the U.S. to four years, replacing the current policy that allows them to remain until their studies are completed. Such changes could deter students in long-term programs, particularly PhD candidates, from choosing the United States.

The uncertainty surrounding U.S. immigration policies has made countries like Canada and the UK increasingly attractive to international students, Banks added.

Despite these challenges, some universities have reported growth in international enrollment. Coppin State University noted the largest increase, with international enrollment rising by 25%, or 16 students. The University of Maryland Eastern Shore and Morgan State University also experienced gains of 8.1% and 9.2%, respectively.

Even with the recent declines in enrollment, state officials have emphasized Maryland’s commitment to attracting and supporting students from around the world, as competition for international talent continues to grow.

According to WTOP News, the landscape for international student enrollment in Maryland remains complex, with ongoing challenges and opportunities for the state’s universities.

Record Flu Numbers in New York State Prompt Official Warnings

New York State is experiencing a record surge in flu cases, with over 71,000 reported in one week, prompting health officials to urge vaccinations and preventive measures.

The New York State Department of Health has announced a significant surge in influenza activity, reporting 71,123 positive flu cases statewide for the week ending December 20. This figure marks the highest number of flu cases recorded in a single week since the tracking of influenza began in New York in 2004.

According to state health data, this weekly total represents a 38% increase from the previous reporting period, indicating a rapidly intensifying flu season. So far this season, there have been a total of 189,312 reported positive flu cases, with influenza-related hospitalizations rising by 63% in the most recent week.

“We are seeing the highest number of flu cases ever recorded in a single week in New York state,” said Health Commissioner Dr. James McDonald in a press release. Earlier this month, the department declared influenza prevalent statewide, a designation that mandates unvaccinated health care workers to wear masks in patient care settings.

Health officials are emphasizing that vaccination remains the most effective means of preventing severe illness and hospitalization due to influenza. New Yorkers who have not yet received their seasonal flu shot are encouraged to do so, as experts suggest that vaccination can still provide protection even later in the flu season.

To help limit the further spread of the virus, the department advises individuals experiencing flu-like symptoms—such as fever, cough, sore throat, or body aches—to stay home. Additionally, state health officials recommend frequent handwashing, the use of hand sanitizer, and avoiding close contact with those who are sick.

For individuals who do become ill, officials note that antiviral medications are available and are most effective when initiated within 48 hours of symptom onset. They also advise that people at higher risk for complications should promptly contact a health care provider for evaluation and potential treatment.

As flu activity typically peaks in January, health officials warn that case counts may continue to rise in the coming weeks, making it crucial for individuals to take preventive measures seriously.

According to Fox News, the current flu season is shaping up to be one of the most severe in recent years, underscoring the importance of vaccination and public health measures to mitigate the impact of the virus.

Fewer International Students Coming to the U.S. Amid Cultural Changes

The United States is experiencing a significant decline in international student enrollment, alongside a resurgence of interest in cultural and sports legacies that shape national identity.

The United States is witnessing a notable shift in its global appeal for students, even as long-forgotten musical legacies and iconic sports moments are being re-examined decades later. From a sharp decline in international student arrivals to renewed attention on the work of a pioneering R&B singer and the golden anniversary of one of football’s most famous plays, these stories reflect how politics, culture, and memory continue to shape public life.

A recent report indicates that the number of international students arriving in the United States has fallen by 19% compared to the previous year, raising alarms among universities and policymakers. Education journalist Kavitha Cardoza highlights that this downturn is not occurring in isolation but is closely linked to shifts in immigration rhetoric and policy.

“The message sent to students abroad matters enormously,” Cardoza notes, emphasizing the broader implications of the Trump administration’s approach to immigration. Under Donald Trump, international students faced increased visa scrutiny, uncertainty regarding work authorization, and an overall atmosphere that many perceived as unwelcoming.

Universities, particularly those reliant on international tuition and research talent, are already feeling the impact of this decline. International students contribute billions of dollars annually to the U.S. economy and play a crucial role in advancing science, technology, and innovation. Experts warn that a sustained decrease in international enrollment could undermine America’s long-standing position as the world’s premier destination for higher education.

Beyond the economic implications, Cardoza emphasizes the human aspect of this issue. “These students are not just numbers,” she states. “They bring perspectives, cultural exchange, and intellectual energy that enrich campuses and communities.”

While one chapter of American influence appears to be narrowing, another is being rediscovered. Journalist Michael Hall is bringing renewed attention to the remarkable career of Esther Phillips, a teenage R&B sensation whose contributions were nearly lost to history.

In 1962, Phillips achieved a top-10 hit with “Release Me,” a success that led to the album “The Country Side of Esther Phillips.” Despite its bold blending of country and soul—an innovative move for its time—the album faded into obscurity.

“Phillips was ahead of her era,” Hall explains. “She crossed genre boundaries at a time when the industry, and society, were deeply segregated—musically and culturally.” Revisiting her work now, he argues, offers a chance to recognize how Black women artists shaped modern American music long before they received proper credit.

This Sunday also marks the 50th anniversary of the original “Hail Mary” play, one of the most dramatic moments in NFL history. Hall of Fame receiver Drew Pearson recently reflected on the catch that changed football lore forever.

“It wasn’t just a pass—it was disbelief in motion,” Pearson recalled, describing the split-second decision, the leap, and the catch that stunned fans and opponents alike. The phrase “Hail Mary,” now commonplace in sports language, was born in that moment and has since come to symbolize last-second hope against impossible odds.

For Pearson, the anniversary is not merely about nostalgia. “It reminds you how one moment can define a career, a team, even a generation of fans,” he said.

Though these stories span education policy, music history, and professional sports, they share a common thread: the power of environment—political, cultural, or historical—to shape opportunity and legacy.

As fewer international students choose the U.S., questions loom about America’s global openness. As Esther Phillips’ music is rediscovered, long-overdue recognition is finally taking shape. And as Drew Pearson revisits the Hail Mary, the enduring magic of shared memories continues to unite fans across generations.

Together, these narratives highlight a nation constantly redefining itself—sometimes through the choices it makes today, and sometimes through the stories it decides to remember tomorrow, according to Global Net News.

China Dismisses Pentagon Report on India Relations as Irresponsible

China has dismissed a Pentagon report linking its border tensions with India to efforts to counter growing India-U.S. ties, calling the assessment “irresponsible” and based on false narratives.

BEIJING – On December 25, China rejected a report from the U.S. Department of Defense that suggested easing border tensions with India was part of Beijing’s strategy to counter the strengthening ties between India and the United States. Chinese officials labeled the assessment as “irresponsible” and rooted in misleading narratives.

During a media briefing in Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian emphasized that China views its relationship with India from a “strategic and long-term perspective.” He reiterated Beijing’s commitment to maintaining stability along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), the de facto border between the two nations. “The boundary question is a matter between China and India, and the current border situation is generally stable with smooth communication channels,” Lin stated. He also expressed opposition to what he termed “groundless and irresponsible comments” made by third parties.

This response came in the wake of the Pentagon’s annual report to Congress, titled “Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2025.” The report indicated that China might be looking to leverage the de-escalation of tensions along the LAC to stabilize its relations with India and prevent further deepening of U.S.-India ties.

The Pentagon report referenced a meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi that took place on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in October 2024. It noted that disengagement agreements at various standoff points had been reached prior to these talks. The report highlighted that this meeting marked the beginning of monthly high-level engagements focused on border management and broader bilateral issues, including direct flights, visa facilitation, and exchanges involving academics and journalists.

In addition to its comments on India, the Pentagon report also outlined China’s expansion of its “core interests” to encompass Taiwan, sovereignty claims in the South China Sea, the Senkaku Islands, and Arunachal Pradesh.

Separately, Chinese Defense Ministry spokesperson Zhang Xiaogang criticized the Pentagon report for emphasizing China’s defense and space cooperation with Pakistan and for implying that Beijing was considering establishing a military base in the country. “The U.S. releases such reports year after year, grossly interfering in China’s internal affairs,” Zhang remarked during a different briefing.

Zhang accused the Pentagon of “maliciously misinterpreting” China’s national defense policy, making “unfounded speculations” about its military development, and exaggerating a “Chinese military threat” to mislead the international community. He expressed strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to the report’s conclusions, urging Washington to cease fabricating narratives that provoke confrontation.

These developments reflect ongoing tensions in the region and highlight the complexities of international relations involving major powers like China, India, and the United States, as they navigate their respective interests and security concerns.

According to India West, the situation remains fluid, with both nations striving to manage their bilateral relationship amid external pressures.

Marjorie Taylor Greene Criticizes Trump’s Meetings with Foreign Leaders

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene criticized President Trump’s international meetings, urging a focus on domestic issues amid ongoing global conflicts involving Ukraine and Israel.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican from Georgia, expressed her concerns on social media regarding President Trump’s recent meetings with foreign leaders. As Trump engages with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Greene is advocating for a more America-centric approach to governance.

On Sunday, Trump met with Zelenskyy at his Mar-a-Lago estate to discuss a peace plan aimed at resolving the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, which began with Russia’s invasion in February 2022. Following this meeting, Netanyahu is scheduled to meet with Trump on Monday to address Israel’s ongoing conflicts in the Middle East. This marks the sixth meeting between Trump and Netanyahu this year.

Greene took to X, formerly known as Twitter, to voice her discontent with the president’s focus on international matters. “Zelensky today. Netanyahu tomorrow,” she wrote. “Can we just do America?” Her comments reflect a broader sentiment among some lawmakers who believe that U.S. resources should prioritize domestic needs over foreign engagements.

The congresswoman has been a staunch critic of U.S. military aid to foreign nations, particularly amid the escalating conflicts in Europe and the Middle East. She has previously labeled Zelenskyy a “dictator who canceled elections” and described Israel’s military actions in Gaza as both a genocide and a humanitarian crisis.

Greene’s remarks come at a time when she is set to resign from the House in January. Her relationship with Trump has been strained in recent months, particularly following a public disagreement over her push to release documents related to investigations into the late Jeffrey Epstein. This feud led Trump to withdraw his endorsement of Greene, branding her a “traitor.”

As the political landscape continues to evolve, Greene’s call for a focus on American issues resonates with a segment of the Republican base that prioritizes domestic concerns over international diplomacy.

According to Fox News, Greene’s comments highlight the ongoing debate within the Republican Party regarding the balance between foreign policy and domestic priorities.

UK Prime Minister Criticized for Welcoming Freed Egyptian Prisoner

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer faces backlash for welcoming home human rights activist Alaa Abd el-Fattah, following resurfaced social media posts containing violent and antisemitic language.

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is under fire after celebrating the return of Alaa Abd el-Fattah, a human rights activist recently released from an Egyptian prison. The backlash stems from Abd el-Fattah’s past social media posts, which allegedly contain violent and antisemitic language.

A dual British-Egyptian national, Abd el-Fattah had been imprisoned in Egypt for most of the past 14 years. His release came in September after a pardon from the Egyptian president. However, he remained in Egypt under a travel ban that was only recently lifted, allowing him to return to the U.K. on Friday.

Upon Abd el-Fattah’s return, Starmer expressed his delight at the activist’s reunion with his family in Britain. However, this warm welcome was met with criticism from various political figures.

Robert Jenrick, a senior member of the opposition Conservative Party, condemned Starmer for what he described as a “personal, public endorsement” of Abd el-Fattah. Jenrick questioned whether Starmer was aware of the activist’s controversial past social media posts, which allegedly included endorsements of violence against Zionists and police.

Jenrick urged Starmer to condemn Abd el-Fattah’s remarks and retract his “unalloyed endorsement” of the activist. “Nobody should be imprisoned arbitrarily nor for peaceful dissent,” Jenrick stated. “But neither should the prime minister place the authority of his office behind someone whose own words cross into the language of racism and bloodshed.”

Calls for Abd el-Fattah’s British citizenship to be revoked and for his deportation have also come from Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage.

In response to the growing criticism, the U.K. government clarified that Starmer was unaware of the “abhorrent” social media posts when he issued his welcoming statement. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office emphasized that advocating for Abd el-Fattah’s release does not equate to endorsing his past comments.

The government condemned Abd el-Fattah’s historic tweets, labeling them as “abhorrent.” In a statement, they reiterated that it has been a long-standing priority for both major political parties to secure his release.

Shortly after arriving at London’s Heathrow Airport, Abd el-Fattah issued an “unequivocal apology” for his past comments, describing them as “expressions of a young man’s anger” during times of regional crises and police brutality in Egypt.

Abd el-Fattah’s family has maintained that he spent the majority of the past 14 years in prison due to his opposition to the government of Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi. His mother, Laila Soueif, 69, even undertook a 10-month hunger strike to pressure British authorities to take more action to secure her son’s freedom.

Following the resurfacing of Abd el-Fattah’s controversial posts, he defended his comments, stating they were taken out of context and were part of a “private conversation” during an Israeli offensive in the Gaza Strip, according to The Times of London.

The situation continues to evolve as political leaders and the public respond to the implications of Abd el-Fattah’s past and the government’s stance on his return.

According to The Associated Press, the controversy surrounding Abd el-Fattah’s return highlights the complexities of balancing human rights advocacy with the ramifications of past actions.

Lawsuit Filed Against TiE New York Ahead of Gala Event

A lawsuit against TiE New York, alleging governance failures and misconduct, was filed just weeks before the organization’s annual gala, with many defendants served during the event.

A lawsuit alleging governance failures, fiduciary breaches, and misconduct within TiE New York was filed in Queens County Supreme Court more than a month prior to the organization’s annual gala. This legal action has intensified scrutiny over the nonprofit’s governance practices.

The lawsuit, initiated by charter member Kesav Dama both individually and derivatively on behalf of TiE New York, was formally filed on November 11, 2025, and entered into the court system by November 14, 2025. This timing has raised questions about what the leadership of TiE New York knew regarding the internal disputes that have now escalated into a judicial matter.

According to court documents and service records, 10 of the 12 named defendants were served with legal papers during the TiE New York Gala. The defendants include current and former board members and officers, such as then-President Jignesh Patel and Secretary Vaibhav Parikh. TiE New York itself is named as both a nominal and direct defendant in the case.

Typically a celebratory fundraising and networking event, the gala became the backdrop for the formal notification of litigation. The allegations claim that TiE New York’s board failed to act on repeated warnings about misconduct and governance violations.

Legal experts note that while serving legal papers at a public event is unusual, it is not improper if defendants are otherwise difficult to reach or regularly attend scheduled functions together.

The verified complaint outlines multiple causes of action, including breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, defamation, tortious interference with business relationships, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The claims assert that TiE New York leadership failed to investigate or discipline alleged misconduct by its president despite numerous written complaints. Additionally, the plaintiff alleges that an improper demand for evidence was issued as a delaying tactic, and that internal communications containing defamatory statements about a charter member remained uncorrected.

Furthermore, the lawsuit contends that the board continued governance and election activities while litigation was imminent or already underway. The legal action is partly based on New York Not-for-Profit Corporation Law §720, which governs the fiduciary duties of directors and officers.

Alongside the complaint, the plaintiff filed an Order to Show Cause, seeking immediate court intervention. The requested relief includes prohibiting TiE New York from using organizational funds to defend the lawsuit, halting board elections or changes to election rules, preserving and producing board minutes and governing documents, and staying major governance actions pending judicial review.

Justice Karina E. Alomar of the Queens County Supreme Court signed the Order to Show Cause, initially setting a hearing for December 18, 2025. However, court records indicate that Jignesh Patel requested an adjournment of this hearing, which was subsequently delayed to December 22, 2025. The reason cited for the adjournment was the need for additional time to prepare a response to the requested emergency relief following the service of the lawsuit.

This adjournment has raised further questions about whether TiE New York leadership continued its routine operations, including board activity and event planning, after the lawsuit was filed and served.

The litigation marks a significant escalation from what began as an internal governance dispute. Previously, the complainant had submitted formal written complaints and demand letters weeks earlier, urging the immediate suspension of the president and warning of potential legal exposure if the board failed to act.

Newly reviewed records indicate that the complainant, through counsel, complied with requests for evidence within a compressed timeframe. However, the board allegedly declined to take any disciplinary action prior to the lawsuit being filed. By the time defendants were served at the gala, the dispute had already shifted from an internal review to judicial oversight.

Nonprofit governance specialists note that derivative lawsuits, particularly those seeking to halt elections and restrict the use of organizational funds, represent some of the most serious legal challenges a nonprofit board can face. “Once an Order to Show Cause is granted, the court is signaling that the allegations merit immediate attention,” said one nonprofit governance attorney not involved in the case. “It also raises legitimate questions about whether directors are acting independently or protecting incumbents.”

The timing of the service at the gala, combined with the delayed hearing request, may now become part of a broader factual record examined by the court.

As the case unfolds, it places renewed focus on transparency, accountability, and fiduciary responsibility within one of the region’s most prominent entrepreneurial nonprofit organizations. TiE New York and the individual defendants have not publicly commented on the litigation, and requests for comment were not returned by press time.

As this situation develops, it will be crucial to observe how TiE New York addresses the allegations and what implications this legal action may have for its governance practices moving forward, according to The American Bazaar.

New Letters Question Leadership and Oversight at TiE New York

Newly surfaced letters linked to an internal complaint have raised concerns about the leadership and governance practices of TiE New York, alleging intimidation and procedural interference.

Recent developments surrounding TiE New York have drawn attention to the chapter’s leadership and governance practices. Supplemental letters associated with an internal complaint have surfaced, alleging intimidation and procedural interference within the organization.

These new documents have intensified scrutiny of the chapter’s leadership, prompting questions about the effectiveness of its governance norms. The allegations suggest that procedural integrity may have been compromised, raising concerns among members and stakeholders alike.

The internal complaint, which was first reported in October 2025, highlighted issues of misconduct within the leadership ranks of TiE New York. The latest letters appear to corroborate some of the claims made in that initial complaint, further complicating the chapter’s governance landscape.

As the situation unfolds, members of TiE New York are calling for greater transparency and accountability from their leadership. The chapter, which is part of a global network aimed at fostering entrepreneurship, is now facing a critical moment in its governance structure.

In light of these allegations, it remains to be seen how TiE New York will address the concerns raised by its members and what steps will be taken to restore confidence in its leadership. The chapter’s ability to navigate these challenges will be crucial in maintaining its reputation and effectiveness within the entrepreneurial community.

For more information on this developing story, please refer to The American Bazaar.

Peter Thiel’s Potential Move from California Sparks Comments from Ro Khanna

California Congressman Ro Khanna defends a proposed billionaire tax, arguing it will promote shared prosperity and innovation, despite warnings from tech elites like Peter Thiel about leaving the state.

California Congressman Ro Khanna has firmly countered concerns from tech elites regarding a proposed billionaire wealth tax, asserting that such a measure would enhance democracy, fund healthcare, and foster innovation. His remarks come in response to comments made by billionaire Peter Thiel, who indicated he might leave California if the state implements a temporary wealth tax aimed at supporting healthcare amid significant Medicaid cuts.

Khanna, representing California’s 17th Congressional District—which encompasses much of Silicon Valley—took to social media platform X to express his views. He quoted President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who famously dismissed threats from wealthy industrialists during the New Deal era, stating, “I will miss them very much.”

“Peter Thiel is leaving California if we pass a 1% tax on billionaires for five years to pay for healthcare for the working class facing steep Medicaid cuts,” Khanna wrote. “I echo what FDR said with sarcasm of economic royalists when they threatened to leave.”

The proposed 2026 Billionaire Tax Act was filed with the California Attorney General’s office in October 2025 and has since been amended. If it qualifies for the ballot, it is expected to be presented to voters in the November 2026 election, pending the collection of approximately 870,000 to 900,000 signatures from registered voters.

Khanna emphasized the immense wealth and innovation already present in his district, which he described as having a collective value of $18 trillion—nearly one-third of the U.S. stock market—within a 50-mile radius. He noted that the district is home to five companies with market capitalizations exceeding $1 trillion.

In another post, Khanna addressed concerns that a billionaire tax would hinder the emergence of future tech giants. He pointed to NVIDIA founder Jensen Huang as an example of how innovation thrives in Silicon Valley, regardless of tax policies. “Those saying that we wouldn’t have a future NVIDIA in the Bay if this tax goes into effect are glossing over Silicon Valley history,” he stated. “Jensen was at LSI Logic and his co-founders at Sun. He started NVIDIA in my district because of the semiconductor talent, Stanford, innovation networks, and venture funding.”

Khanna argued that the region’s innovation is driven by talent density, research institutions, and capital networks rather than the allure of low taxes on extreme wealth. “He built here because the talent is here,” Khanna added. “Jensen wasn’t thinking I won’t start this company because I may have to one day pay a 1 percent tax on my billions.”

Highlighting the importance of public investment in the technologies that generate significant private wealth, Khanna pointed out that many foundational breakthroughs in artificial intelligence emerged from publicly funded research. He cited the creation of ImageNet by Fei-Fei Li at Stanford, which was supported by National Science Foundation funding, as a prime example.

Khanna credited institutions such as the National Science Foundation, DARPA, Stanford University, UC Berkeley, San Jose State University, and the broader University of California system as integral to Silicon Valley’s success. He argued that this public infrastructure has been crucial for maintaining the U.S.’s position as a global leader in innovation, even noting that the UC system won five Nobel Prizes in a single year.

While acknowledging the vital role of entrepreneurs in commercializing innovation, Khanna rejected the notion that modest taxes on extreme wealth would deter ambition. “Yes, we need entrepreneurs to commercialize disruptive innovation,” he wrote. “But the idea that they would not start companies to make billions, or take advantage of an innovation cluster, if there is a 1–2 percent tax on their staggering wealth defies common sense and economic theory.”

Khanna framed the billionaire tax as a necessary response to a broader national crisis characterized by extreme inequality and a declining belief in the American dream. “We cannot have a nation with extreme concentration of wealth in a few places but where 70 percent of Americans believe the American dream is dead and healthcare, childcare, housing, education is unaffordable,” he cautioned.

Drawing historical parallels, Khanna noted that unchecked inequality has historically destabilized societies, referencing events from the Industrial Revolution in Britain to revolutions in France and Russia. He emphasized that the challenge for the U.S. is to ensure that the advancements brought about by the AI revolution benefit society as a whole, rather than just a select few.

“America’s central challenge is to make sure the AI revolution works for all of us, not just tech billionaires,” he stated. Khanna concluded by asserting that democracy and social cohesion—not tax avoidance—are the true drivers of long-term economic success. “So yes, a billionaire tax is good for American innovation,” he wrote, “which depends on a strong and thriving American democracy.”

Thiel, known for his support of former President Donald Trump, has been a prominent figure in Silicon Valley’s right-wing circles, having spoken at the Republican National Convention in 2016 and contributed significantly to Trump-aligned causes.

These discussions surrounding the billionaire tax reflect a broader debate about wealth distribution and the role of public investment in fostering innovation and economic growth, particularly in a state that is home to some of the world’s most valuable companies.

According to The American Bazaar, Khanna’s stance highlights a growing tension between the tech elite and policymakers advocating for more equitable economic policies.

Trump’s Holiday Season: A Look at His Influence and Legacy

Donald Trump embraces the holiday spirit with a mix of self-promotion and political maneuvering, showcasing his accomplishments while taking jabs at critics and rivals.

In a festive twist, Donald Trump has donned the role of Santa Claus, crafting his own naughty and nice list as he celebrates the holiday season. At the top of his nice list is none other than himself, dubbed the “President of Peace” with a promise of “Results for America.”

The White House has been keen to remind the public of Trump’s achievements, which include claims of having “ended eight wars,” reducing NATO spending by 5%, reforming USAID, securing historic border agreements, and combating drug cartels.

In a striking display of military action, Trump marked Christmas with a “powerful and deadly strike against ISIS terrorist scum in Northwest Nigeria,” citing the group’s violent targeting of innocent Christians as justification for the attack. He extended holiday wishes, stating, “MERRY CHRISTMAS to all, including the dead terrorists, of which there will be many more if their slaughter of Christians continues.”

This military operation followed Trump’s recent directive for a “complete” blockade of sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving Venezuela, warning its leader, Nicolás Maduro, that it would be “smart” for him to step down.

In a bid to assert U.S. interests, Trump reignited tensions with Denmark by insisting that the U.S. “has to have” Greenland, appointing a special envoy to the semiautonomous Arctic territory.

In a show of support for the military, Trump announced a new class of Navy battleships, named after himself, to replace what he described as an “old and tired and obsolete” fleet. He emphasized that the design of the new “Trump class” ships would reflect his personal aesthetic standards, stating, “I’m a very aesthetic person.”

In a move against renewable energy, Trump paused all large-scale offshore wind projects in the U.S., citing “national security concerns” and his belief that wind turbines harm marine life.

Despite a setback from the Supreme Court, which rejected his bid to deploy the National Guard in Illinois, Trump maintained a positive outlook, refraining from retaliatory comments.

The Commerce Department also made Trump’s nice list, reporting a 4.3% growth in the U.S. economy during the third quarter, exceeding expectations and marking the fastest growth in two years. His team quickly attributed this success to Trump’s policies, stating, “This is a direct result of everything @POTUS has put in place.”

On his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump celebrated the news, proclaiming, “TRUMP IS DOING AN AMAZING JOB!” He noted that the U.S. is on track to record its largest single-year decline in murders and highlighted a decrease in federal employment, which has fallen by 271,000 jobs since he took office.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio also received praise for recalling 30 career ambassadors appointed by the previous administration and for reinstating the use of Times New Trump font in diplomatic communications, reversing what he deemed a “wasteful” diversity initiative.

Other government departments have followed suit, adopting Trump’s preferred terminology, replacing terms like “undocumented” and “noncitizen” with “illegal alien.” The classification of unaccompanied minors has also reverted to “Unaccompanied Alien Child,” while “gender” has been replaced with “sex” on official documents.

In a lighthearted moment, Trump revealed that Santa himself was on his watchlist during a holiday event where he and the First Lady spoke with children across the country. He remarked, “We track Santa all over the world. We want to make sure that Santa is being good.”

Trump humorously suggested that Santa should deliver “clean, beautiful coal” for Christmas, tying in his earlier executive order aimed at bolstering the U.S. coal industry.

After the festive call, Trump returned to political discourse in a holiday message on Truth Social, wishing a “Merry Christmas to all, including the Radical Left Scum that is doing everything possible to destroy our Country, but are failing badly.”

He took aim at the media, particularly “The Failing New York Times,” labeling it a “true enemy of the people” for its perceived misrepresentation of his administration. Trump also criticized various news networks and late-night shows for their negative coverage, suggesting that their broadcast licenses should be revoked.

In a whimsical illustration accompanying his holiday message, Trump is depicted in a Santa hat, racing to deliver tax refund checks, prompting critics to question whether he is truly delivering for the American people or merely for himself.

Despite a canceled annual Christmas Eve concert at the Kennedy Center due to his name being added to the building, Trump encouraged viewers to watch “THE TRUMP KENNEDY CENTER HONORS,” where he served as host. He playfully asked for feedback on his hosting abilities, suggesting he might consider leaving the presidency to pursue a full-time career in entertainment.

As Trump continues to navigate the political landscape during the holiday season, he remains focused on promoting his agenda while taking jabs at his opponents, embodying the spirit of the season in his own unique way.

The post Trumpiana: Trumple bells, Trumple bells, Trump all the way! appeared first on The American Bazaar.

New Documents Raise Concerns Over TiE New York Leadership

Newly uncovered documents raise significant concerns about governance and procedural integrity within TiE New York amid escalating disputes and potential litigation involving the organization’s leadership.

Internal correspondence and legal warnings have surfaced, raising serious questions about governance, procedural fairness, and potential conflicts of interest within TiE New York, one of the organization’s most influential chapters. The documents emerge amid an escalating dispute between charter member Kesav Dama and the leadership of TiE New York, which may lead to litigation.

The recently reviewed documents, dated between October 6 and October 31, 2025, indicate that an internal complaint alleging repeated code-of-conduct violations by then-TiE New York President Jignesh Patel has transformed into a broader confrontation over board procedures, evidentiary fairness, and fiduciary responsibilities under New York nonprofit law.

At the heart of these revelations is a “Notice to Provide Evidence and Information” issued by TiE New York Secretary Vaibhav Parikh. Although the notice is dated October 14, 2025, multiple documents and email records suggest it was actually sent on October 16, effectively backdating the request while imposing a two-business-day deadline for compliance.

The notice demanded extensive documentation from Dama, including complete message histories, call logs, financial substantiation related to a 2023 TiE NY gala, and details about discussions he had regarding his complaint. This demand is particularly concerning given that much of the requested information was already available within the board’s own records.

Backdating a formal request during an active dispute, especially when combined with a compressed response window, can severely undermine confidence in procedural neutrality. This is especially critical in a nonprofit context, where fairness and transparency are paramount.

The October 14 notice also raised eyebrows by invoking Federal Rule of Evidence 106, known as the “rule of completeness,” to justify the demand for unredacted communications and full message threads. Attorneys representing Dama responded strongly, arguing that federal evidentiary standards are not applicable in internal nonprofit governance matters, which are instead governed by New York Not-for-Profit Corporation Law and TiE NY’s own bylaws. In a detailed response dated October 31, Dama’s counsel characterized the demand as “highly improper,” “harassing,” and beyond the board’s authority, particularly since the board already controlled the relevant financial and governance records.

The documents also highlight a significant conflict: whether Secretary Vaibhav Parikh can serve as a neutral administrator of the process while also being a material witness. Correspondence reveals that Parikh had multiple substantive conversations with Dama over the summer of 2025 regarding the very conduct now under investigation, as suggested by TiE Global Chairman Murali Bukkapatnam. Furthermore, Parikh was copied on a controversial email from Vivek Rathi that accused Dama of impropriety, which was circulated to board members just before Patel’s disciplinary deliberations.

Dama’s counsel argues that if Parikh participated in or transmitted that communication, he would be required to recuse himself under basic conflict-of-interest principles. Conversely, if Patel disseminated the email after being notified of the complaint against him, this conduct could be viewed as further retaliation and manipulation of the disciplinary process.

Documents reviewed indicate that the Rathi email was not treated as an independent complaint but rather as an informal, unsolicited communication that TiE NY leadership nonetheless classified as a “cross-complaint,” despite the absence of a formal filing or notice to Dama. According to the October 6 demand letter, the Rathi email was circulated to board members immediately before Patel’s disciplinary hearing, allegedly damaging Dama’s reputation and diverting attention from the substantive allegations against Patel. Dama’s counsel contends that elevating the email to complaint status without proper procedure constituted “gross negligence” and may have tainted the board’s deliberations.

Further allegations suggest that Rathi, a recently inducted charter member, may have been coached on how and whom to contact, raising additional questions about whether the email was strategically used to “muddy the waters” rather than address legitimate concerns.

The October 6 submission outlines a timeline of alleged threats and coercive communications attributed to Patel, including text messages in which he purportedly claimed he could “shut down” Dama’s professional relationships by invoking influential third parties. Screenshots included in the record show Patel referencing specific individuals as leverage, conduct that Dama’s attorneys argue clearly violates TiE’s code of conduct and warrants immediate suspension without prolonged process.

The documents emphasize that TiE New York, as a private nonprofit, is not bound by constitutional due-process standards applicable to government action. Boards retain the authority to act decisively on prima facie evidence to protect the organization.

By October 31, the dispute had escalated further, with Dama’s counsel issuing a formal litigation hold notice to the TiE NY board. This notice demanded the preservation of all documents related to the complaint, including board minutes, bylaws, and the disputed Rathi email. It explicitly warned board members of potential personal liability under New York law for breaches of fiduciary duty, citing duties of care, loyalty, and obedience. It also referenced potential actions under Sections 623 and 720 of the Not-for-Profit Corporation Law, which permit derivative and direct claims against directors and officers for misconduct.

Taken together, the documents depict an organization grappling with an internal crisis while striving to maintain procedural credibility. The backdated evidence demand, the invocation of inapplicable federal rules, unresolved recusal questions, and the late-stage litigation hold all suggest that TiE New York’s handling of the dispute may now be as significant as the underlying allegations themselves.

As of now, TiE New York leadership has not publicly addressed the backdating of the October evidence request or clarified whether independent counsel or an external investigator has been engaged. For a global nonprofit founded on principles of entrepreneurship, ethics, and leadership, the unfolding controversy presents a critical test: whether its governance mechanisms can withstand scrutiny or if deeper reforms are necessary to restore trust among its charter members.

According to The American Bazaar, the situation continues to evolve as stakeholders await further developments.

Israel Recognizes Somaliland as First Country; Trump Remains Hesitant

Israel has officially recognized Somaliland as an independent nation, marking a historic diplomatic milestone in the Horn of Africa.

In a significant diplomatic development, Israel has become the first country to officially recognize Somaliland as an independent nation. This announcement was made by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on December 26, alongside Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar and Somaliland’s President, Dr. Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi.

The recognition is part of a broader framework linked to the Abraham Accords, which were brokered during the Trump administration. In a mutual declaration signed by both parties, Israel and Somaliland affirmed their commitment to establishing formal diplomatic relations.

Sa’ar expressed that the relationship between Somaliland and Israel has been strengthened through extensive dialogue. He noted that full diplomatic relations will include the appointment of ambassadors and the opening of embassies in Somaliland.

President Abdullahi welcomed Israel’s decision, stating that it represents a significant milestone in Somaliland’s long-standing pursuit of international legitimacy. He emphasized that this recognition reaffirms Somaliland’s historical, legal, and moral entitlement to statehood.

Somaliland’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs described Israel’s recognition as a “constructive contribution to peace, stability, and cooperation” in the Horn of Africa and the Middle East. The ministry also expressed Somaliland’s intention to join the Abraham Accords, looking forward to engaging with Israel on the basis of mutual recognition.

Following Israel’s announcement, South Sudan reportedly became the second country to officially recognize Somaliland. This development has led to speculation regarding whether the United States will follow suit.

In August, President Donald Trump indicated that he was considering the recognition of Somaliland. Official recognition by the U.S. could provide a strategic foothold in the Horn of Africa, potentially facilitating the establishment of a new air and sea base at Berbera Port, located near the entrance to the Red Sea.

When asked about the possibility of resettling Gazans in Somaliland, Trump stated, “We’re looking into that right now.” This move would position U.S. defense forces directly across from Yemen, where Houthi militants, backed by Iran, have been known to launch attacks against Israel and maritime shipping in the Red Sea.

The Red Sea is a critical maritime route, with approximately thirty percent of the world’s container ship traffic passing through its waters en route to or from the Suez Canal.

Trump is scheduled to meet with Netanyahu on December 29 at his Mar-a-Lago residence to discuss the next steps in the Gaza peace deal. Despite the discussions, Trump has reportedly been hesitant to fully embrace Somaliland’s independence and has expressed skepticism regarding its interest in joining the Abraham Accords.

In an interview with the New York Post, Trump remarked that he needs to “study” Netanyahu’s pitch, questioning, “Does anyone know what Somaliland is, really?” He added, “We’ll study it. I study a lot of things and always make great decisions, and they turn out to be correct.”

Somalia has faced decades of conflict with Islamist fundamentalist groups, prompting the U.S. Africa Command to increase military operations against ISIS and al-Shabab militants. Somaliland, which declared independence from Somalia in 1991, has positioned itself as a stable and democratic entity, contrasting sharply with the ongoing turmoil in Somalia.

Somaliland Minister of the Presidency Khadar Hussein Abdi emphasized that Somaliland has maintained a democratic and peaceful governance model for over three decades, unlike its counterpart. He stated, “It’s time for Somalia to focus on its own challenges and to be constructive. The illusion of Somali unity ended long ago.”

Netanyahu has reportedly invited President Abdullahi to visit Israel, commending his leadership and commitment to promoting stability and peace in the region.

As the situation evolves, the international community will be watching closely to see how these developments impact the geopolitical landscape of the Horn of Africa and the broader Middle East, according to Fox News.

Trump’s Proposal for ‘Trump-Class’ Battleship Encounters Significant Challenges

President Donald Trump’s proposal for a “Trump-class” battleship has sparked debate among experts regarding its feasibility, costs, and relevance to modern naval strategy.

President Donald Trump has unveiled plans for a new “Trump-class” battleship, aiming to make a significant impact on the U.S. armed forces. On Monday, he declared that this vessel would be “the fastest, the biggest, and by far, 100 times more powerful than any battleship ever built.”

The first ship in this proposed class is to be named the “USS Defiant,” with an initial plan to construct two vessels and the potential for fleet expansion in the future. According to Trump’s announcement, the Trump-class battleships are envisioned to feature advanced weaponry, including hypersonic missiles, nuclear-capable cruise missiles, and directed-energy weapons such as high-powered lasers. The initiative is framed as both a military enhancement and a symbolic effort to reassert U.S. strength on the global stage.

The proposal has ignited a debate among defense analysts and policymakers. Proponents argue that these ships could serve as a deterrent and bolster U.S. naval capabilities. However, critics have raised concerns, pointing out that traditional battleships have largely been supplanted by aircraft carriers, submarines, and multi-role surface vessels.

Mark Cancian, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, expressed skepticism about the proposal. In a commentary published on December 23, he stated, “There is little need for said discussion because this ship will never sail.” Cancian predicted that “a future administration will cancel the program before the first ship hits the water.”

Bernard Loo, a senior fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, characterized the proposal as “a prestige project more than anything else.” He noted that historically, battleships have been viewed through the lens of size, suggesting that a simplistic understanding of strategy often equates larger vessels with greater power.

Key details surrounding the Trump-class battleships, including final designs, budgets, construction timelines, and necessary congressional approvals, remain unresolved. It is still uncertain whether these ships will be built as proposed. While the announcement has garnered extensive media coverage and public interest, the Trump-class battleships currently exist as a conceptual initiative, facing significant engineering and logistical challenges before any construction could realistically commence.

High-profile proposals like this often serve as statements of intent, signaling priorities and projecting national strength, regardless of their ultimate feasibility. The ongoing debate surrounding the Trump-class initiative underscores the tension between symbolic gestures and practical defense considerations, with analysts weighing factors such as feasibility, cost, and strategic relevance.

Moreover, conceptual projects like the Trump-class battleship highlight the broader challenges inherent in modern military planning. Successful advancement from idea to implementation requires alignment of technological capabilities, resource allocation, and bureaucratic approval processes. Even proposals that encounter skepticism can shape defense discourse, influencing how policymakers, experts, and the public perceive future military developments.

The discussion surrounding the Trump-class battleship reflects the complexities of contemporary defense strategy, where innovation must be balanced with practicality and strategic necessity. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether this ambitious proposal will gain traction or fade into the realm of unfulfilled military aspirations.

According to American Bazaar.

Tesla Faces Investigation by U.S. Auto Safety Regulator

Tesla is under investigation by the NHTSA over potential safety concerns related to the emergency door release design in its Model 3 vehicles, raising questions about passenger safety in emergencies.

Tesla is facing scrutiny from the U.S. auto safety regulator, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), regarding the emergency door release design in its Model 3 compact sedans. The investigation was announced on December 23, following a defect petition that raised concerns about the accessibility and visibility of the emergency door release controls during critical situations.

The NHTSA’s inquiry focuses on whether the placement, labeling, and overall design of the emergency door release could pose a safety risk. In emergencies such as crashes, fires, or power failures, it is crucial for passengers to exit the vehicle quickly and safely. However, reports have indicated that the mechanical door release in the Model 3 may be hidden, unlabeled, and not intuitive for occupants unfamiliar with the vehicle.

In Tesla Model 3 vehicles, doors are primarily opened using electronic buttons instead of traditional handles. While mechanical emergency releases are included in the design, some users have reported difficulty locating these releases under stress or in low-visibility conditions. This has prompted the NHTSA to take a closer look at the situation.

The NHTSA’s defect investigations are preliminary steps in the regulatory process and do not automatically lead to a recall. During this investigation, the agency will collect data, review consumer complaints, analyze the vehicle’s design, and may request additional information from Tesla. If a safety-related defect is identified, Tesla could be required to issue a recall or implement design changes to mitigate the issue.

As of now, Tesla has not acknowledged any wrongdoing. The company has consistently maintained that its vehicles comply with all applicable safety standards. Supporters of Tesla’s design philosophy argue that simplified interiors reduce clutter and that the emergency releases are adequately documented in owner manuals.

This investigation underscores a larger conversation within the automotive industry as vehicles increasingly rely on software-driven designs. As manufacturers move away from traditional mechanical controls, regulators are paying closer attention to how design choices impact usability and safety in emergency situations. The outcome of this investigation could have significant implications not only for Tesla but also for other automakers exploring similar minimalist design approaches.

While inquiries like this do not inherently indicate fault, they serve as important reminders that user experience during emergencies is a critical aspect of overall vehicle safety. The findings from this review may influence how manufacturers balance innovation with accessibility, potentially shaping future design standards across the automotive industry.

According to The American Bazaar, the investigation reflects ongoing concerns about passenger safety in modern vehicles.

Goodbye to the 24-Hour Day? Future of Earth’s Timekeeping

The prospect of Earth transitioning to 25-hour days is intriguing, but the timeline for such a change spans millions of years, making it a distant concern for humanity.

The notion that Earth could one day abandon its familiar 24-hour rhythm in favor of 25-hour days is a captivating idea. While it sounds dramatic and almost apocalyptic, the scientific basis for this claim is grounded in reality. However, the timeline for such a shift is so extensive that it belongs more to the realm of deep planetary history than to immediate human concerns.

Scientists agree that Earth’s rotation is gradually slowing down, a phenomenon that is neither mysterious nor new. This deceleration is primarily the result of the gravitational relationship between Earth and the Moon, a cosmic interaction that has been unfolding for billions of years. As a result, our days are lengthening—by mere milliseconds over centuries, rather than by hours overnight.

Many people are taught that a day lasts exactly 24 hours. In truth, this figure is a convenient average rather than a fixed constant. The “solar day,” which measures the time it takes for the Sun to return to the same position in the sky, is about 24 hours. However, when measured against distant stars, Earth completes a rotation slightly faster, a phenomenon known as a sidereal day.

Moreover, Earth’s rotation is not perfectly steady. It fluctuates due to various internal and external factors, and over long periods, the overall trend is clear: the planet is slowing down.

According to NASA, this gradual change is measurable with modern atomic clocks and astronomical observations. Historical records of eclipses, combined with today’s precision instruments, reveal that days in the distant past were significantly shorter. For instance, hundreds of millions of years ago, Earth completed a full rotation in less than 23 hours.

The primary driver of this slowdown is tidal friction. The Moon’s gravity exerts a pull on Earth’s oceans, creating tidal bulges. Because Earth rotates faster than the Moon orbits, these bulges are dragged slightly ahead of the Moon’s position. This misalignment acts like a brake on Earth’s rotation, siphoning off rotational energy.

This energy is not lost; rather, it is transferred. As Earth spins more slowly, the Moon gains orbital energy and gradually drifts farther away from our planet, at a rate of about 3.8 centimeters per year. Scientists often liken this interaction to a spinning chair that gradually loses speed when a foot lightly drags on the floor.

Researchers studying Earth-Moon dynamics have described this interaction in detail, and institutions such as the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service closely monitor subtle changes in Earth’s orientation and timekeeping.

So, when can we expect to see 25-hour days? This is where sensational headlines can mislead. There is no specific date when calendars will suddenly require an extra hour. Based on current models, it would take approximately 200 million years for Earth’s rotation to slow enough that a full day lasts 25 hours.

To put this into perspective, modern humans have existed for about 300,000 years. Civilizations, calendars, and even continents will undergo significant transformations long before Earth reaches that milestone.

Astrophysicists studying long-term planetary evolution, including research from the University of Toronto, emphasize that this process unfolds on geological timescales. Consequently, it will not impact daily life, work schedules, or biological rhythms for any foreseeable generation.

While the Moon is the dominant factor in this gradual deceleration, it is not the only influence on Earth’s rotation. Redistribution of mass—such as melting ice sheets, shifting groundwater, or large-scale geological events—can slightly alter the planet’s spin. Even these effects, however, change day length by microseconds rather than minutes.

Due to these tiny variations, timekeepers occasionally introduce leap seconds to keep atomic clocks aligned with Earth’s rotation. Agencies like the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the U.S. Naval Observatory monitor these fluctuations with extreme precision.

In the grand scheme of things, the idea of a future 25-hour day is scientifically valid but practically irrelevant to humanity. It serves as a reminder that Earth is not a rigid machine but a dynamic system shaped by gravity, oceans, and time itself.

Our planet has been slowing down since long before humans existed, and it will continue to do so long after we are gone. While the clocks on our walls may tick steadily, on a cosmic scale, time on Earth is always quietly changing, according to NASA.

Nonprofit Employs Underwater Technology to Locate Missing Service Members

Project Recover employs advanced underwater technology to locate and repatriate missing service members from past conflicts, having successfully brought home 24 Americans to date.

Project Recover, a nonprofit organization dedicated to locating missing service members from previous conflicts, is utilizing advanced underwater technology to aid in its mission. The organization has successfully repatriated 24 Americans, contributing to the ongoing effort to account for more than 80,000 service members who remain unaccounted for.

According to the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency, research and technological advancements suggest that the remains of approximately 38,000 fallen veterans could potentially be recovered. Project Recover collaborates closely with the agency to conduct complex underwater missions aimed at bringing these service members home.

“This is a great American story here,” said former Navy Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet, who also serves as a member of Project Recover’s advisory council. “Our work is to use technology, like underwater drones and scuba diving gear, to find the platforms that these members perished on and then do the DNA analysis of detecting and recovering their remains and matching them to those that are missing.”

Project Recover was founded by Dr. Patrick Scannon, who conceived the idea in 1993 while touring the Palau islands with his wife. During their visit, he discovered a downed World War II aircraft, which he described as a pivotal moment in his life. “That 65-foot wing essentially changed my life,” Scannon recalled in an interview.

Since its inception, Project Recover teams have identified numerous aircraft sites around the Palau islands, linked to nearly 100 service members who went missing in action. Gallaudet emphasized the challenges involved in these recovery missions, stating, “The recovery is difficult. We first have to find the aircraft or ships, and then we’ve got to go determine if there are any remains there and then ID them, match them to the service members.”

The Palau islands played a significant role during World War II, particularly in the U.S. effort to liberate the Philippines. The battle for Peleliu, which began in September 1944, was expected to last only a few days but extended to 74 days, resulting in heavy casualties on both sides. Over 1,800 Americans were killed, and more than 8,000 were wounded or went missing during the conflict.

Project Recover’s work has led to the recovery of remains from several service members, including those of Lt. Jay Manown, AOM1c Anthony Di Petta, and ARM1c Wilbur Mitts. The three men were on a bombing mission when their aircraft was struck by enemy fire and crashed into the ocean. “The plane was hit by enemy fire, and it burst into flames,” Di Petta’s niece, Suzanne Nakamura, recounted.

After locating the wreckage in 2015, Project Recover conducted multiple dives to recover the remains of the three service members. Gallaudet noted that the last of the remains was finally identified after extensive forensic analysis and DNA testing. A ceremony was held in Manown’s hometown in West Virginia, attended by the relatives of all three men.

The nieces of the service members have formed a close bond through this shared experience. “We’ve communicated beautifully and become friends through this experience and almost a sisterhood of type,” said Rebecca Sheets, Manown’s niece. Diana Ward, Mitts’ niece, expressed her joy in meeting the others in person, highlighting the emotional connection they share regarding their uncles’ sacrifices.

Project Recover has conducted over 100 missions across 25 countries, successfully repatriating 24 missing Americans and locating more than 200 others who remain unaccounted for. The organization is currently raising funds for a mission planned for 2026, which aims to search for a B-52 aircraft that disappeared during a training accident.

“It’s off the coast of Texas. We’ve not yet found the aircraft. And of those eight service members, they all had families,” Gallaudet explained. He noted that approximately 32 family members of the missing service members are still alive and seeking answers about their loved ones.

In addition to the 80,000 missing-in-action service members, there are around 20,000 who are unaccounted for due to training accidents. Unfortunately, the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency is unable to allocate funds for the search for the B-52, as the crash occurred during a non-conflict training mission.

The B-52 bomber disappeared in February 1968 during a routine training mission, and despite an extensive nine-day search, no trace of the aircraft was found. Gallaudet expressed optimism about locating the wreckage, stating, “This B-52 off the Texas coast hasn’t been located yet, but we think we know where the area is. We’re going to find it.”

To date, Project Recover has raised over $300,000 for the mission, with an additional $200,000 needed to continue the search for the eight service members. If the organization can locate the remains, the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency will be able to allocate resources for a recovery effort.

For more information about Project Recover and to support their mission, visit their website.

Ro Khanna Condemns Nick Fuentes’ Attacks on Indian-American Vivek Ramaswamy

Democratic Representative Ro Khanna has condemned far-right provocateur Nick Fuentes for his repeated attacks on Indian-American Republicans, particularly Vivek Ramaswamy and Usha Vance.

Democratic Representative Ro Khanna has publicly criticized far-right commentator Nick Fuentes for what he describes as a troubling pattern of attacks against prominent Indian-American Republicans, including entrepreneur and former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and Usha Vance.

Khanna’s remarks came in response to Fuentes’ rhetoric aimed at Ramaswamy, which has focused on his Hindu faith and Indian heritage. Khanna characterized these comments as “chilling” and indicative of a broader trend of extremist politics in the United States.

In a post on X, Khanna stated, “Nick, your campaigning against Vivek Ramaswamy because he is Hindu & of Indian heritage to send a message to JD Vance in 28 is chilling. I reject your bigotry against Vivek & Usha Vance. Many Hindu Americans, including my family, love celebrating Christmas. Merry Christmas.”

Khanna’s condemnation followed a series of incidents where Fuentes escalated his attacks on Ramaswamy, employing racial slurs and derogatory terms such as “anchor baby.” Fuentes has also suggested that Ramaswamy should be disqualified from running for governor of Ohio.

In his post, Khanna directly countered Fuentes’ assertion that a Ramaswamy governorship would end Christmas celebrations at the Governor’s Mansion. He emphasized that this claim was not only misleading but also ignorant, highlighting that many Hindu Americans do celebrate Christmas, reflecting the diverse fabric of American society.

Fuentes, known for his far-right views, framed his criticism as a matter of electoral importance, arguing that Ramaswamy’s faith disqualifies him from office. He stated, “Could you imagine? No nativity, no Christmas carol, no consecration at the altar of Christ, no reverence for the newborn king! What a world! He has to be denied next year.”

During a recent podcast, Fuentes again resorted to racially charged language while discussing the Ohio election. He reiterated his use of the term “anchor baby” and expressed his willingness to support any alternative candidate, stating, “This anchor baby cannot become the governor of Ohio. I don’t care if it’s a Jewish woman who wins,” in reference to Democratic candidate Amy Acton.

The term “anchor baby” is widely recognized as derogatory, referring to children born in the United States to immigrant parents, despite the fact that birthright citizenship is protected under American law. Fuentes argued that a Ramaswamy victory would set a dangerous precedent, asserting, “What kind of message would that send? That sends a message that you can say and do anything to white people; they’ll tolerate any level of disrespect.”

These comments emerged shortly after Vice President JD Vance publicly rebuked Fuentes for targeting his wife, Second Lady Usha Vance. Vance responded bluntly, telling Fuentes to “eat s–t” following the attacks on Usha, who is the daughter of Indian immigrants.

Vivek Ramaswamy, who is of Indian descent, has consistently spoken out against racism and antisemitism. During a recent speech at AmFest, he emphasized that American identity should be rooted in shared values and ideals rather than ancestry or lineage.

Despite the backlash, Fuentes has continued to escalate his rhetoric, portraying Ramaswamy and his family as outsiders who fail to assimilate. He suggested that they should “go back to India,” while mocking their Indian heritage and religious background. Fuentes declared, “If you want to live here, give an ounce and a shred of respect to the people that built this country.”

Khanna’s condemnation of Fuentes highlights the ongoing tensions surrounding race, identity, and politics in America, particularly as they pertain to the experiences of Indian Americans in the political landscape.

According to The American Bazaar, the situation continues to evolve as these discussions gain traction in the public sphere.

Defense and AI Will Strengthen India-US Relations, Think Tank Official Says

Defense cooperation, artificial intelligence, and emerging technologies are set to define the next phase of India-U.S. relations, according to a senior policy expert.

WASHINGTON, DC – The future of India-United States relations is poised to be anchored in defense cooperation, artificial intelligence, and emerging technologies. This perspective comes from Dhruva Jaishankar, Executive Director of the Observer Research Foundation America and son of India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar. He emphasized that despite ongoing political and trade challenges, both nations are keen to maintain momentum in strategic sectors.

Jaishankar noted that while high-level political engagement has encountered some constraints, collaboration in defense, technology, and energy continues to progress. This ongoing cooperation serves as a foundation for stabilizing bilateral ties as they look ahead to 2026. He pointed out that there has been some stabilization in the relationship, highlighting that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and former President Donald Trump engaged in discussions at least four times between mid-September and the end of the year.

Even during periods of political strain, practical cooperation has persisted. Jaishankar described defense as one of the most resilient pillars of the India-U.S. partnership. Military-to-military engagement has expanded significantly, encompassing joint exercises involving all three branches of the military, collaborative training programs, and ongoing arms sales. However, he acknowledged that the historical challenge has been progressing toward joint co-production and development.

According to Jaishankar, the most promising opportunities for collaboration now lie in advanced and niche capabilities rather than traditional legacy platforms. He specifically identified cutting-edge technologies such as autonomous underwater systems and counter-drone capabilities as key areas of interest. In these domains, India has specific operational requirements, while the United States is at the forefront of technological advancements. Jaishankar cautioned that the success of these initiatives will heavily depend on private-sector engagement rather than solely on government-to-government agreements.

Artificial intelligence is another critical area of growing engagement between the two nations, although their expectations do not yet fully align. India is focused on the rapid deployment of AI applications for public benefit and commercial viability. In contrast, the United States prioritizes maintaining its leadership in developing cutting-edge AI technologies. Despite these differing objectives, major technology firms such as Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI have made significant investments in India, reflecting their confidence in the country’s digital ecosystem.

Regarding the Quad, Jaishankar noted that while political-level momentum has lagged, with leaders’ summits being repeatedly deferred, working-level engagement remains active. This includes meetings focused on counter-terrorism and maritime exercises. Looking ahead, he indicated that progress on trade and tariffs will be crucial for unlocking higher-level political engagement. Jaishankar expressed cautious optimism that some resolution could emerge later in 2026, potentially coinciding with the U.S. hosting the G20 summit.

As the India-U.S. partnership evolves, the focus on defense and technology underscores the importance of collaboration in addressing shared challenges and advancing mutual interests.

According to IANS, the emphasis on these strategic sectors indicates a commitment to strengthening ties despite the complexities of international relations.

New Documents Question TiE New York Leadership and Board Oversight

Newly reviewed documents reveal serious allegations against TiE New York’s leadership, raising concerns about governance and accountability within the influential entrepreneurship network.

New filings have surfaced that add detail to allegations involving the leadership of TiE New York (TiE NY), a prominent chapter in the global TiE entrepreneurship network. This follows an initial report in October 2025, which highlighted an internal complaint against the organization’s president, Jignesh Patel, for alleged misconduct. At that time, TiE NY leadership refrained from commenting in detail, citing an ongoing internal process.

Recent documents suggest that the controversy may be more extensive and consequential than previously understood. Two supplemental letters submitted to the TiE New York board in early October outline serious accusations against Patel, including claims of misconduct towards a charter member and attempts to manipulate the disciplinary process. The letters formally demand Patel’s immediate suspension and warn the board of potential legal exposure should they fail to act.

These developments raise critical questions about internal accountability, board independence, and the effectiveness of TiE NY’s disciplinary mechanisms, particularly when allegations involve senior leadership.

In the original complaint, Kesav Dama, a TiE New York Charter Member, accused Patel of threatening and intimidating behavior. Dama alleged that Patel communicated threats via text messages, suggesting he could “shut down” Dama’s professional relationships by leveraging influential figures within the TiE ecosystem.

While Patel has not publicly admitted to any wrongdoing, and TiE NY has not disclosed the findings of its internal review, the newly surfaced documents expand the narrative beyond the alleged threats to include the organization’s response to the complaint.

The first supplemental letter, dated October 2, 2025, was sent to TiE NY Secretary Vaibhav Parikh. It outlined three potential paths for the board: do nothing, request Patel’s resignation without findings, or formally find misconduct that would trigger consequences beyond TiE New York. The letter emphasized that allowing a resignation without findings would enable Patel to avoid accountability and continue participating in other TiE chapters.

Furthermore, the letter warned that failure to act could expose individual board members to personal liability under New York law, especially if the organization lacks directors and officers (D&O) insurance. It also called for procedural safeguards, including a roll-call vote and the mandatory recusal of at least one board member alleged to be both a witness and a participant in the complained-of conduct. The letter stated that failure to recuse would “taint the entire vote” and provide grounds for appeal.

Perhaps most strikingly, the letter demanded transparency if no action were taken, including the publication of the full complaint to all TiE NY charter members via email and WhatsApp.

A second letter, submitted on October 6, 2025, escalated the matter significantly. This letter formally demanded the immediate suspension of Jignesh Patel, alleging that he had manipulated the disciplinary process by encouraging a third-party complaint against Dama. The document referenced an email from Vivek Rathi, which was described as irrelevant to the underlying misconduct allegations and part of a broader effort to intimidate the original complainant.

The authors of the second letter argued that the timing, recipients, and framing of Rathi’s email suggested coaching by senior leadership, although no direct documentary evidence of such coaching has been publicly disclosed. The letter invoked the legal doctrine of “forfeiture by wrongdoing,” asserting that attempts to intimidate or discredit a complainant should result in the loss of procedural protections typically afforded during internal disciplinary proceedings.

Included with the October 6 letter were exhibits featuring screenshots of text messages attributed to Patel. In one message dated April 2, 2025, Patel allegedly wrote: “I can call Ashish and shut down anything you have going on with him. Same goes for Ranu.” In another message, he reportedly invoked the name of a prominent TiE figure to suggest similar leverage. If authenticated, these messages could substantiate claims of intimidation and misuse of positional authority.

As of now, Patel has not publicly confirmed the authenticity of these messages, and TiE NY has not released any independent verification.

A recurring theme in the documents is the tension between “due process” and the need for immediate action. The authors argue that while TiE NY is a private organization not bound by constitutional due process, it still has an obligation to protect its members from retaliation and witness intimidation. They contend that allowing a sitting president to remain in office while under investigation—especially in light of new allegations of interference—undermines the credibility of the process itself.

This argument aligns with governance standards increasingly adopted by nonprofits and professional associations, where temporary suspension during an investigation is viewed as a risk-mitigation measure rather than a presumption of guilt.

As of publication, TiE New York has not publicly disclosed whether it has suspended Patel, made findings of fact, or referred the matter to TiE Global. Multiple requests for comment sent to TiE NY leadership and Patel have not received substantive responses.

The lack of transparency has raised concerns among some charter members, according to individuals familiar with internal discussions, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Several described a fear of retaliation and skepticism regarding the board’s ability to independently adjudicate complaints involving its own officers.

The documents also raise structural questions: If, as alleged, TiE NY lacks D&O insurance, and if board members were warned of potential liability, what legal advice did they receive? Additionally, how does TiE Global oversee governance failures at the chapter level?

This situation is significant beyond TiE New York. With chapters worldwide and deep connections to venture capital, startups, and diaspora business networks, TiE’s leadership culture influences thousands of entrepreneurs. Allegations that a chapter president leveraged influence to threaten a member—and subsequently attempted to discredit that member after a complaint was filed—strike at the core of organizational trust.

Even if some allegations are ultimately disputed or unproven, the documents indicate a breakdown in fundamental governance principles: independence, transparency, and protection against retaliation.

Looking ahead, it remains unclear whether the board acted on the demands outlined in the supplemental letters. What is evident is that a paper trail exists, revealing a more complex story than the initial complaint alone.

For now, TiE New York faces a credibility test. How it addresses allegations against its own leadership may determine whether it is perceived as a values-driven institution or one that closes ranks when power is challenged.

The reporter will continue to seek comments from all parties and update this story as additional facts emerge, according to The American Bazaar.

India’s Impact on U.S. International Student Mobility Shifts Momentum

Over the past five years, U.S. international student mobility has experienced significant shifts, particularly influenced by the changing dynamics between India and the U.S. amid the pandemic and evolving immigration policies.

International student mobility has always experienced cycles of highs and lows, but for U.S. inbound mobility, the last five years have been particularly tumultuous. The COVID-19 pandemic initiated one of the most dramatic downturns in recent memory, leading to a steep decline in incoming students from China, which had been the largest sending country for over a decade.

At one point in 2020, the collapse in Chinese enrollments was so sharp that many in the field began to question whether global student mobility would recover or if the landscape had fundamentally shifted. Professional associations, enrollment managers, and international educators openly wondered if international recruitment could return to pre-pandemic levels.

Yet, amid this historic disruption, India emerged as an unexpected stabilizer for U.S. inbound mobility. The narrative of U.S. enrollment during this period became a tale of two countries operating under vastly different global conditions. As U.S.-China relations deteriorated due to geopolitical tensions, trade disputes, and COVID-19 restrictions, mobility between the two nations slowed to a near halt.

In contrast, U.S.-India relations strengthened significantly, with both governments coordinating bilateral air bubbles throughout the pandemic. These agreements enabled thousands of new and continuing Indian students, many of whom had temporarily returned home, to travel back to the U.S. at a time when most of the world remained closed.

When borders around the world finally reopened, enthusiasm among Indian students grew stronger. The U.S. tech sector, unlike many other industries, had not only weathered the pandemic but had also rapidly expanded. Companies were hiring aggressively, driven by digital transformation, remote-work infrastructure, and unprecedented demand for technology services.

For a moment, it seemed that even a basic background in computer science or data analytics could open a pathway into the U.S. tech industry. This tech rush, emerging from one of the most difficult periods in modern history, gave prospective Indian students renewed confidence.

Many students saw signs of stability in the U.S. economy, reassurance in early mass vaccination efforts, and a renewed belief in the opportunities that the U.S. could provide. For U.S. institutions still recovering from the profound enrollment losses of 2020, this moment signaled both opportunity and urgency.

Many universities across the country began reevaluating their China-centric recruitment models and redirecting resources toward India. This strategic pivot was most visible at the graduate level, where Indian students have historically accounted for a substantial share of STEM and business program enrollments. To capitalize on the growing demand, institutions hired India-based recruiters, expanded partnerships with Indian education agents, increased participation in India-focused recruitment tours, and strengthened digital outreach targeting Indian applicants.

A major benefactor during this boom was a group of regional public and private institutions, often located in small college towns or outside major metropolitan centers. These institutions became particularly attractive to Indian graduate students for several reasons.

Many offered significantly lower tuition compared to flagship universities, and a substantial number waived GRE or GMAT requirements entirely, simplifying the admissions process. Some even removed application fees, reducing financial barriers to entry. Coupled with lower costs of housing, transportation, and overall living expenses in smaller U.S. communities, these campuses presented an appealing alternative for cost-conscious international students.

For many Indian applicants, particularly those prioritizing affordability and return on investment, the trade-off between location and lower cost was an easy one to make. This broader transformation was notable because U.S. institutions have historically been the most cautious among the Big Four destinations (the U.S., UK, Canada, and Australia) in working with education agents.

Long-standing concerns around accountability and ethical recruitment practices had discouraged widespread adoption of agent-driven models. However, the combined pressures of pandemic-related losses and soaring demand from India prompted a rapid reevaluation. Enrollment needs increasingly outweighed prior reservations, leading to significant collaborations with Indian education agents across the sector.

At the same time, institutions recognized that academic offerings needed to align with evolving student interests. Demand for STEM programs, particularly those offering three years of Optional Practical Training (OPT), spurred the rapid development of new degree pathways. Long-established programs in computer science, informatics, data science, information systems, and cybersecurity expanded dramatically.

Even professional degrees that had never been categorized as STEM, such as traditional MBAs, began restructuring curricula to meet Department of Homeland Security (DHS) requirements for STEM designation. The Biden administration’s support for STEM expansion accelerated these trends.

Institutions also experimented with shortening traditional two-year master’s programs into one-year or 1.5-year formats to lower the total cost of attendance. For Indian families, who often prioritize return on investment, these condensed programs became highly attractive. As a result, a wave of new and redesigned programs emerged between 2021 and 2023, each tailored to the expectations of prospective Indian students.

Meanwhile, the recruitment boom was mirrored by a historic surge in U.S. visa processing. In 2022 and 2023, U.S. consulates and embassies in India issued record numbers of F-1 visas, signaling strong bilateral cooperation and reinforcing the narrative that the U.S. remained the top destination for Indian students.

Although institutions were aware of the risks associated with overreliance on a single market, lessons learned from previous declines in China and Saudi Arabia made it difficult to diversify quickly. Cities such as Hyderabad, Vijayawada, Guntur, and others across Andhra Pradesh and Telangana became major recruitment hubs.

Institutions built partnerships with local universities, organized graduate fairs, and launched 2+2 and 3+1 pathway programs. The rapidly growing Telugu-speaking diaspora in the U.S. reinforced this pipeline, serving as both a cultural anchor and a visible reminder that the American dream was attainable.

This influence was evident beyond university campuses, seen in mainstream grocery stores stocking Indian staples, the growth of South Asian restaurants, and American theaters screening Tollywood and Bollywood films.

However, as with any period of rapid growth, the boom eventually met resistance. Beginning in Fall 2024, U.S. student visa issuance to India declined sharply. This shift coincided with the arrival of a new U.S. administration and adjustments to immigration and work authorization policies, introducing greater uncertainty into the decision-making process for students and families.

Almost immediately, students began reassessing their options. Many turned toward more affordable destinations in the Global South or considered high-quality programs offered by Indian institutions themselves, including new international branch campuses.

India, one of the youngest countries in the world, with a significant portion of its population under 25, is acutely aware of the need to educate and skill its expanding workforce. The future of Indian outbound mobility will depend heavily on U.S. policy decisions, visa stability, post-study work opportunities, and affordability.

At the same time, India’s domestic higher education sector is rapidly scaling, expanding partnerships, enhancing research capabilities, and introducing new global programs aimed at retaining talent.

Only time will tell how this landscape evolves. However, it is clear that the extraordinary surge of Indian graduate enrollment that revitalized U.S. institutions after the pandemic has begun to slow. An era once defined by unprecedented growth has reached an inflection point, marking the end of one chapter in U.S. international student mobility and the uncertain beginning of another, according to The American Bazaar.

Ancient Plague Mystery Unraveled Through DNA in 4,000-Year-Old Remains

Researchers have discovered ancient plague DNA in a 4,000-year-old sheep tooth, shedding light on how the disease spread across Eurasia long before the Black Death.

Long before the Black Death ravaged medieval Europe, a more ancient and enigmatic form of plague traversed vast regions of Eurasia. For decades, scientists have grappled with understanding how this ancient disease, which emerged during the Bronze Age, managed to endure for nearly 2,000 years and spread over considerable distances without the flea-borne transmission that characterized later outbreaks.

Now, researchers have made a groundbreaking discovery that may finally explain this mystery: the detection of plague DNA in the remains of a domesticated sheep that lived over 4,000 years ago.

In a study published in the journal Cell, scientists report the first known evidence that the ancient plague bacterium, Yersinia pestis, infected animals—not just humans—during the Bronze Age. This finding provides a crucial missing link in understanding how the disease circulated so widely among early societies.

The breakthrough originated from an unexpected source: a tooth from a Bronze Age sheep unearthed in what is now southern Russia. Within this ancient tooth, researchers identified genetic material from Yersinia pestis.

“It was alarm bells for my team,” said Taylor Hermes, an archaeologist at the University of Arkansas and co-author of the study. “This was the first time we had recovered the genome of Yersinia pestis from a non-human sample.”

Prior to this discovery, all confirmed Bronze Age plague genomes had been extracted from human remains, leading researchers to believe that the disease primarily spread through human-to-human contact. However, this theory never fully accounted for the remarkable geographic reach of the plague.

“This sheep changed the picture entirely,” Hermes noted.

The Bronze Age, which spanned approximately from 3300 to 1200 B.C., was marked by significant social and technological advancements. Communities began to maintain larger herds of domesticated animals, utilize horses for long-distance travel, and expand trade routes across Eurasia.

According to scientists, these developments created ideal conditions for diseases to jump between species.

“Our plague sheep gave us a breakthrough,” Hermes explained. “It had to be more than just people moving. We now see it as a dynamic between humans, livestock, and some still unidentified natural reservoir.”

Researchers believe the sheep likely contracted the bacteria from another animal—possibly rodents or migratory birds—that carried the pathogen without exhibiting symptoms. The disease could then have been transmitted to humans through close interactions during herding, slaughtering, or daily care.

This model of animal-human transmission helps clarify how the plague persisted for centuries, even before fleas became its primary vector in later outbreaks.

Extracting usable DNA from ancient animal remains poses significant challenges. Unlike human burials, which were often protected by ritual practices, animal remains were typically exposed to harsh environmental conditions.

“When we test livestock DNA, we get a complex genetic soup of contamination,” Hermes explained. “Soil, microbes, modern DNA—everything mixes together.”

The DNA fragments recovered from ancient animals are often minuscule, sometimes as short as 50 genetic “letters,” compared to the more than three billion letters in a modern human genome. Isolating meaningful pathogen DNA from this background noise requires meticulous work and advanced technology.

This makes the recent discovery particularly remarkable.

“This was a lucky find,” Hermes said. “But it also shows that livestock remains can preserve crucial information about ancient diseases.”

When the plague re-emerged in the Middle Ages as the Black Death, it spread rapidly through flea-infested rats and resulted in the deaths of an estimated one-third of Europe’s population. However, the plague during the Bronze Age exhibited different characteristics.

Earlier versions of Yersinia pestis lacked the genetic mutations that facilitate flea transmission. Without animals acting as intermediaries, scientists struggled to explain how the disease traveled so effectively across Eurasia.

The sheep genome fills that gap.

“This discovery forces us to rethink how ancient diseases moved,” Hermes stated. “Livestock weren’t just passive companions to human migration—they were active participants in disease ecology.”

Beyond unraveling an ancient mystery, the findings hold modern significance. Many of today’s most dangerous diseases—from influenza to COVID-19—originated as animal-borne infections before jumping to humans.

The Bronze Age plague may represent one of the earliest documented examples of zoonotic disease spread facilitated by human behavior.

“As people moved into new environments and interacted more closely with animals, they created pathways for pathogens,” Hermes said. “That pattern hasn’t changed.”

Researchers caution that their conclusions are based on a single ancient sheep genome, which limits the broader applicability of the findings. More samples are needed to confirm how widespread animal infection was and which species played key roles.

The study was led by scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, with senior authors Felix M. Key and Christina Warinner, who is affiliated with both Harvard University and the Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology.

The research was funded by the Max Planck Society, which has also supported follow-up fieldwork in the region.

Moving forward, the team plans to analyze additional ancient animal and human remains from across Eurasia. Their objectives include identifying the original wild reservoir of the bacteria and mapping how plague spread alongside Bronze Age trade, herding, and migration routes.

“Understanding how ancient diseases emerged and spread helps us anticipate future risks,” Hermes concluded. “It reminds us that human health has always been deeply connected to the animals we live with.”

Thousands of years later, a single sheep tooth has reopened a chapter of human history and revealed how closely our fate has always been tied to the unseen world of microbes, according to Source Name.

Lynching of Hindu Factory Worker in Bangladesh Raises Religious Tolerance Concerns

The lynching of a Hindu factory worker in Bangladesh has raised alarms about rising religious intolerance and the deteriorating security situation in the country.

The brutal lynching of a young Hindu factory worker in Bangladesh has sent shockwaves across South Asia, intensifying fears that a growing leadership vacuum and deteriorating law-and-order situation are emboldening extremist violence against religious minorities.

Dipu Chandra Das, 27, was killed last Thursday after co-workers at a garment factory outside Dhaka accused him of blasphemy during a workplace discussion. What began as a verbal dispute reportedly escalated into mob violence, culminating in Das being dragged into the street, lynched, and his body set on fire.

The killing, described by authorities as one of the most disturbing recent episodes of mob violence, occurs amid a broader period of instability in Bangladesh. Extremist groups are increasingly exploiting political uncertainty and social tensions ahead of a national election scheduled for February.

Das worked long 12-hour shifts inspecting clothing produced for international fashion brands, earning the equivalent of about $150 a month. According to colleagues and family members, he was a quiet, educated man—a college graduate, married for three years, and the father of a toddler daughter.

On Thursday evening, toward the end of the factory shift, a discussion reportedly broke out among workers about religion. A colleague, Selim Mia, recounted that some Muslim workers had remarked that the upcoming Friday prayers were an opportunity to repent for the week’s sins.

Das allegedly responded that such emphasis sounded superstitious. When challenged about Hindu beliefs, he reportedly replied that all religions contain elements of superstition. According to Mia, the exchange quickly spiraled out of control.

“People started accusing him of insulting Prophet Muhammad,” Mia said.

As rumors spread within and beyond the factory floor, an angry crowd formed outside. Das was dragged into the street, beaten, tied to a tree, and burned. Police later stated they have not been able to verify whether Das made any blasphemous statement.

By Monday, Bangladeshi authorities had arrested 12 people, including two of Das’s co-workers, the factory manager, and a floor supervisor. Naimul Hassan, a senior police official, questioned why those in charge failed to intervene.

“Why didn’t they hand him over to the police, or why didn’t they take any measure to save him?” Hassan asked.

Authorities also arrested one additional woman on suspicion of inciting violence. As is standard practice, they did not immediately release the names of all suspects.

Das’s brother, Opu Chandra Das, described the harrowing hours leading up to the discovery of his brother’s death.

“At around 7 p.m., we received a call saying my brother was in trouble and we should come quickly,” he said. “But around 8 or 8:30 p.m., they called again to say my brother was no more.”

When Opu reached the scene later that night, his brother’s body lay bloodied and burned in the street. Security forces struggled to keep the mob from further desecrating the remains as they transported the body for a post-mortem examination.

The following evening, Opu accompanied his brother’s corpse on a lonely journey back to their village, about 40 miles away, escorted by police. Out of fear, only a handful of relatives attended the cremation.

“People were scared,” Opu said. “They thought they could be targeted next.”

Human rights groups assert that the killing reflects a broader breakdown of security following the fall of Bangladesh’s longtime leader Sheikh Hasina, who fled to India last August after being toppled in student-led protests.

Since then, Bangladesh has been governed by an interim administration led by Muhammad Yunus, an 85-year-old Nobel Peace Prize winner. His government has condemned recent violence, framing it as part of a broader security struggle rather than targeted religious persecution.

However, the lynching of Das—and the public celebration of the killing by some extremist elements—has cast doubt on that assessment.

“Religious minorities are particularly vulnerable in periods of political transition,” said a Dhaka-based human rights researcher. “What we’re seeing is extremist groups testing boundaries and exploiting uncertainty.”

The killing has sparked concern in India, where Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has repeatedly raised alarms about the treatment of Hindus in Bangladesh.

Analysts note that the violence fits into a wider South Asian pattern of religious intolerance. In Pakistan, accusations of blasphemy have repeatedly led to mob lynchings amid rising Islamist militancy. In Afghanistan, most of the remaining Sikh and Hindu population fled after deadly attacks prior to the Taliban’s return to power.

India has also witnessed a surge in mob violence, with Hindu vigilante groups targeting Muslims and other minorities, often over allegations of cow slaughter. Just last week, police reported that a migrant laborer, Ram Narayan Baghel, was lynched in southern India after being mistaken for a Bangladeshi Muslim—a label often used loosely by Hindu nationalist politicians.

International observers warn that Bangladesh’s upcoming election could further inflame tensions if extremist groups continue to operate with impunity.

“This is not just about one horrific murder,” said a regional analyst. “It’s about the erosion of trust in institutions meant to protect citizens, regardless of faith.”

For the Das family, however, the political implications offer little comfort.

“My brother worked hard, minded his own life, and believed in harmony,” Opu said. “He never imagined words could cost him his life.”

As Bangladesh grapples with its uncertain future, the lynching of Dipu Chandra Das has become a stark symbol of the dangers minorities face when law, leadership, and tolerance falter—and a reminder that without swift accountability, fear can spread as fast as rumor, according to Global Net News.

Flu Outbreak: Current Spread of Highly Contagious Variant by State

A highly contagious flu variant known as subclade K is spreading across the United States, raising concerns about vaccine effectiveness and increasing health risks this season.

A new and aggressive form of the flu, identified as subclade K, is making its way across the United States this season. This mutation of the influenza A H3N2 virus has been linked to a significant rise in flu cases globally, including within the U.S.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has noted that the K variant represents “a notable evolution in influenza A (H3N2) viruses,” prompting discussions about the effectiveness of this season’s flu vaccine against this particular strain.

Experts have reported that the K variant is associated with more severe flu symptoms, which include fever, chills, headache, fatigue, cough, sore throat, and runny nose. According to a recent report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), among 216 influenza A(H3N2) viruses collected since September 28, a staggering 89.8% were identified as subclade K.

The CDC continues to monitor the situation through its weekly influenza surveillance report, which tracks states experiencing the highest levels of outpatient respiratory illnesses, although these figures do not necessarily confirm influenza cases.

As of the week ending December 13, the CDC estimated that there have been at least 4.6 million flu-related illnesses, 49,000 hospitalizations, and 1,900 flu deaths this season. Health officials continue to recommend the flu vaccine as the most effective defense against the virus.

In an interview with Fox News Digital, Dr. Neil Maniar, a professor of public health practice at Northeastern University in Boston, emphasized the severity of this emerging flu strain. “It’s becoming evident that this is a pretty severe variant of the flu,” he stated. “Certainly, in other parts of the world where this variant has been prevalent, it’s caused some severe illness, and we’re seeing an aggressive flu season already.”

Dr. Maniar described subclade K as a “perfect storm” for a challenging flu season, noting that overall vaccination rates are down and it remains uncertain whether this year’s flu vaccine effectively targets this specific mutation. “The vaccine is very important to get, but because it’s not perfectly aligned with this variant, I think that’s also contributing to some degree to the severity of cases we’re seeing,” he explained. “We’re going into this flu season with lower vaccination rates and a variant that in itself seems to be more aggressive.”

Despite the challenges posed by the K variant, Dr. Maniar reassured the public that it is not too late to receive the flu vaccine, as peak flu season has yet to arrive. “The vaccine still provides protection against serious illness resulting from the subclade K variant that seems to be going around,” he noted. “There are likely to be lots of indoor gatherings and other events that create risk of exposure, so protection is important.”

Dr. Maniar also pointed out that even healthy individuals can experience severe illness from the flu, making vaccination beneficial for nearly everyone. “Individuals typically start to develop some degree of protection within a few days and gain the full benefit within about two weeks, so now is the time for anyone who hasn’t gotten the vaccine yet,” he advised.

As the flu season progresses, health officials continue to stress the importance of vaccination and awareness regarding the K variant’s potential impact on public health, underscoring the need for vigilance as the season unfolds, according to Fox News.

Indian-American Jenifer Rajkumar Condemns Lynching of Hindu Youth in Bangladesh

New York Assemblywoman Jenifer Rajkumar condemned the mob lynching of a young Hindu man in Bangladesh, highlighting a disturbing trend of violence against religious minorities in the country.

NEW YORK, NY – New York State Assemblywoman Jenifer Rajkumar has condemned the mob lynching of a young Hindu man in Bangladesh, warning of a troubling pattern of violence and persecution targeting religious minorities in the country.

In a recent statement, Rajkumar expressed her deep concern over the ongoing violence against Bangladesh’s Hindu minority, citing the brutal killing of Dipu Chandra Das as a particularly egregious example. Das, a 25-year-old Hindu Bangladeshi, was attacked by a mob, beaten, set on fire, and left on a highway. Authorities have reportedly arrested twelve individuals in connection with this horrific act.

Rajkumar emphasized that this incident is not an isolated case but part of a broader pattern of religious persecution and targeted violence against minorities in Bangladesh. She referenced data from the Bangladesh Hindu Buddhist Christian Unity Council, which documented thousands of incidents of violence against religious minorities over the past year.

According to the Council, there were 2,442 incidents of violence against minorities and over 150 temples vandalized between August 2024 and July 2025. Rajkumar noted that such statistics reflect a climate of fear and insecurity for minority communities, particularly Hindus, in Bangladesh. She stated that the impact of this violence extends far beyond the borders of the country.

“From Queens to countries across the globe, we all share in the fear, pain, and uncertainty faced by Hindus in Bangladesh,” Rajkumar said. She expressed solidarity with the Hindu community in Bangladesh and reiterated her commitment to protecting human rights and religious freedom worldwide.

Rajkumar represents a district in Queens, New York, which is home to a large and diverse immigrant population, including members of the South Asian and Bangladeshi diaspora. Her advocacy highlights the importance of addressing issues of religious persecution and standing up for the rights of all individuals, regardless of their faith.

As the situation in Bangladesh continues to evolve, Rajkumar’s statements serve as a reminder of the ongoing struggles faced by religious minorities and the need for collective action to ensure their safety and rights are upheld, according to IANS.

Bill Clinton’s Spokesperson Calls for Full Release of Epstein Files

Bill Clinton’s spokesperson calls for the full release of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, asserting that the former president does not seek protection from disclosure.

A spokesperson for former U.S. President Bill Clinton has publicly urged the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release all remaining materials related to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. The spokesperson emphasized that Clinton does not need, nor desire, any form of protection from disclosure.

Angel Ureña, Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, made this appeal on Monday via a post on the social media platform X. Ureña argued that the DOJ is legally obligated to provide a complete disclosure under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. “The Department of Justice must produce the full and complete record the public demands and deserves,” he stated, cautioning that partial disclosures could undermine public trust.

This statement follows the DOJ’s release last week of an initial batch of documents connected to Epstein, who died in federal custody in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. The released documents included photographs featuring Clinton, which reignited scrutiny regarding past associations between prominent figures and Epstein.

However, the DOJ’s release has faced bipartisan criticism on Capitol Hill. Lawmakers have accused the department of withholding materials and redacting names that they believe should be made public. Among the most vocal critics are Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, the Democratic and Republican co-sponsors of the transparency law.

Ureña echoed these concerns, stating that the manner in which the files were released raises troubling questions. “What the DOJ has released so far, and the manner in which it did so, makes one thing clear: someone or something is being protected,” he wrote. “We do not know whom, what or why. But we do know this: We need no such protection.”

The photographs released by the DOJ include images showing Clinton in social settings alongside individuals whose identities were obscured. One image depicts the former president in a hot tub with another person whose face was redacted, while another shows an unidentified woman sitting on his lap. These images circulated widely online, fueling speculation despite the absence of any formal allegations against Clinton.

It is important to note that Clinton has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein or his alleged sex-trafficking network. Ureña reiterated this point in an earlier post, asserting that Clinton was among those who “knew nothing and cut Epstein off before his crimes came to light.”

Nevertheless, the renewed attention highlights how the Epstein case continues to resonate within American politics years after his death. Media reports and congressional investigations have kept the spotlight on individuals who once moved in Epstein’s social circles, even when no criminal conduct has been established.

In August, CNN reported that Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s longtime associate who was later convicted for her role in facilitating his abuse of minors, was honored at a Clinton Global Initiative event in 2013. This appearance occurred years after Maxwell had been publicly accused of assisting Epstein, raising questions about due diligence by elite institutions at that time.

On Capitol Hill, the pressure on the Clintons has intensified. James Comer, the Republican chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has called for Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to appear for depositions as part of the committee’s investigation into the Epstein case. Comer issued subpoenas to both in August and set a December 17 deadline for their responses.

Supporters of full disclosure argue that transparency is essential not only for accountability but also to dispel unfounded speculation. By urging the DOJ to release all remaining files—even those that include Clinton—the former president’s camp appears to be attempting to draw a clear line: openness is preferable to lingering suspicion.

Legal experts note that the Epstein Files Transparency Act was designed to address longstanding concerns that powerful individuals could evade scrutiny. Any perception that names are being selectively shielded, they warn, risks eroding confidence in both the justice system and the law itself.

As of now, the DOJ has not indicated when or whether additional materials will be released. However, as bipartisan criticism mounts and public interest intensifies, pressure is growing on federal authorities to demonstrate that the law applies equally to all—regardless of status or political influence.

As Ureña succinctly stated, the Clintons are not seeking special treatment. “The public deserves the truth,” he suggested, “and transparency is the only way to deliver it,” according to Global Net News.

CBS News Faces Internal Dispute After ’60 Minutes’ Pulls Trump Deportation Story

A significant internal dispute has arisen at CBS News following the decision to pull a segment from ’60 Minutes’ that examined deportations during the Trump administration, raising concerns about editorial independence.

A rare and public internal conflict has erupted within CBS News after the iconic investigative program ’60 Minutes’ abruptly decided to withdraw a story that focused on deportations carried out during the Trump administration. This incident has reignited broader discussions about political pressure, editorial judgment, and the independence of newsrooms, particularly in a politically charged media landscape.

Just two hours before the scheduled broadcast on Sunday, CBS announced that a report by veteran correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi would not be aired. The segment was set to explore the experiences of migrants deported from the United States to El Salvador, specifically highlighting allegations of mistreatment and abuse within the high-security CECOT prison.

The decision to pull the story sparked immediate backlash from within the organization, as Alfonsi accused CBS leadership of making a choice based on political motivations rather than editorial standards. Central to the controversy is CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss, who confirmed that she personally made the decision to withdraw the segment, asserting that it did not meet the program’s editorial criteria.

In an email sent to her fellow ’60 Minutes’ correspondents, which was later reported by multiple outlets, Alfonsi stated that the piece had already passed through CBS’s legal and internal standards checks. The only missing element, she noted, was participation from the Trump administration, which had declined multiple requests for interviews.

“In my view, pulling it now after every rigorous internal check has been met is not an editorial decision,” Alfonsi wrote. “It is a political one.”

Alfonsi further emphasized that her team had sought comments from the White House, the Department of State, and the Department of Homeland Security. She argued that the lack of response from these entities should not be grounds for killing the story.

“Government silence is a statement, not a veto,” Alfonsi wrote. “If the administration’s refusal to participate becomes a valid reason to spike a story, we have effectively handed them a ‘kill switch’ for any reporting they find inconvenient.”

The dispute became public during CBS News’ daily internal editorial call on Monday, where Weiss addressed Alfonsi’s memo directly. According to an internal transcript, Weiss defended her decision while expressing frustration over how the disagreement had been characterized.

“The only newsroom I’m interested in running is one in which we are able to have contentious disagreements about the thorniest editorial matters with respect — and, crucially, where we assume the best intent of our colleagues,” Weiss stated. “Anything else is completely unacceptable.”

Weiss insisted that the story was not permanently shelved, expressing her eagerness to air Alfonsi’s report “when it’s ready.” She argued that while the testimonies from former detainees were compelling, similar reporting had already been published by outlets like The New York Times.

“To run a story on this subject two months later, we need to do more,” Weiss said. “And this is ‘60 Minutes.’ We need to be able to get the principals on the record and on camera.”

This clash has reignited scrutiny of Weiss’s appointment last October, which some journalists interpreted as a signal that CBS News might adopt a more cautious approach to covering Donald Trump, a long-time critic of the network. Trump has frequently attacked ’60 Minutes,’ refused interviews during the last election cycle, and even sued CBS over its handling of an interview with his former opponent, Kamala Harris. That lawsuit was settled earlier this year when CBS’s parent company, Paramount Global, agreed to pay Trump $16 million.

Despite Trump’s antagonism, ’60 Minutes’ has continued to air hard-hitting reports during the early months of his second term. Correspondents, including Scott Pelley, have produced investigative pieces critical of the administration. Accepting a journalism award from USC Annenberg earlier this month, Pelley remarked that those stories aired last spring “with an absolute minimum of interference.”

He acknowledged, however, that concerns linger within the newsroom following changes in Paramount’s ownership. “It’s early yet,” Pelley said, “but what I can tell you is we are doing the same kinds of stories with the same kind of rigor, and we have experienced no corporate interference of any kind.”

Nonetheless, the decision to pull Alfonsi’s deportation story has unsettled journalists both inside and outside CBS, reopening a long-standing debate about whether access journalism—the desire to secure interviews with powerful officials—can subtly influence editorial decisions. Critics argue that this incident raises fears that a refusal to participate could become a tool for governments to block unfavorable coverage.

For CBS News leadership, the dispute highlights a different concern: the need to maintain the esteemed reputation of ’60 Minutes,’ a program historically defined by its depth, originality, and commitment to on-the-record accountability.

As the fallout continues, this controversy has placed one of America’s most respected news institutions under an uncomfortable spotlight, testing its commitment to editorial independence at a time when trust in media and the pressures exerted upon it have rarely been higher, according to Global Net News.

Vivek Ramaswamy Addresses Prejudice Within the MAGA Movement

Vivek Ramaswamy confronts prejudice within the MAGA movement, emphasizing the need for a conservative future that rejects racism and extremism during a recent speech at AmericaFest.

PHOENIX, AZ – Prominent Republican leader Vivek Ramaswamy, along with other Indian Americans aligned with the MAGA movement, is increasingly facing challenges from within their own political ranks. This situation has prompted a significant reckoning within the conservative base that Ramaswamy continues to court.

Speaking at Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest on December 19, Ramaswamy took the opportunity to address what he described as prejudice, extremism, and conspiracy-driven abuse originating from within the conservative movement itself. His remarks highlighted both a personal and political struggle, reflecting a deeper conflict in MAGA politics, where immigrant conservatives and Indian Americans are being targeted by the very movement they help lead.

Ramaswamy forcefully condemned the racist attacks directed at Usha Vance, the wife of Vice President JD Vance, responding to derogatory online slurs aimed at her. “If you call the second lady of the United States of America a Jeet, you have no place in the future of the conservative movement,” he stated, earning loud applause from the audience.

He cautioned that the movement risks losing both its moral standing and political credibility if it fails to unequivocally reject extremist voices. Ramaswamy specifically referenced online commentator Nick Fuentes, asserting that anyone who praises Adolf Hitler “has no place in the future of the conservative movement.”

“Anyone who engages in that kind of rhetoric has no place in the conservative movement,” he continued. “And if you can’t say these things clearly and without hesitation, you have no place as a leader at any level, certainly not in my state of Ohio.”

Building on a recent op-ed he published in the New York Times, Ramaswamy also challenged the so-called “heritage American” ideology, which he argued distorts the meaning of citizenship and fosters prejudice against immigrants and their families. He suggested that such thinking could lead to absurd conclusions, such as President Joe Biden being considered “more American” than Donald Trump, whose mother was an immigrant, or Senator Bernie Sanders being viewed as “more American” than Bernie Moreno, who immigrated from Colombia.

“All of this is utterly loony,” Ramaswamy remarked. “An American citizen is an American, period.”

His comments come amid heightened tensions within conservative circles, exacerbated by viral online rumors involving senior Republican figures. In the days leading up to the convention, social media platforms were rife with claims about a supposed rift between JD Vance and Usha Vance, alongside renewed scrutiny of past remarks by Vance regarding his preferences for his wife’s religious beliefs.

Ramaswamy’s bold stance against prejudice within the MAGA movement underscores a critical moment for the Republican Party as it grapples with internal divisions and the challenge of maintaining a cohesive identity in an increasingly polarized political landscape. His call for a more inclusive conservatism may resonate with many who feel marginalized within the current political discourse.

As the MAGA movement continues to evolve, Ramaswamy’s advocacy for rejecting racism and extremism could play a pivotal role in shaping its future direction and appeal to a broader constituency.

According to India-West, Ramaswamy’s remarks reflect a growing awareness and urgency among some conservative leaders to address the issues of prejudice and extremism head-on.

JD Vance and Vivek Ramaswamy Clash Over ‘Jeet’ Slur Against Usha

Vivek Ramaswamy and JD Vance have engaged in a public dispute over racist attacks against Usha Vance, highlighting contrasting views on the implications of extremist rhetoric within the conservative movement.

Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy has publicly defended U.S. Second Lady Usha Vance, condemning the racist attacks directed at her and calling out the ideology behind such remarks.

Ramaswamy’s comments came in response to far-right commentator Nick Fuentes, who used the slur “jeet” to refer to Usha Vance during an appearance on “Piers Morgan Uncensored.” This incident sparked swift backlash across the political spectrum and reignited discussions on how mainstream conservatives should address extremist rhetoric.

The issue resurfaced on Friday when Ramaswamy spoke at AmericaFest, the first Turning Point USA conference since the passing of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. Videos from the Phoenix event quickly circulated on social media, drawing renewed attention to Ramaswamy’s stance.

On stage, Ramaswamy reiterated a position he had previously articulated in a New York Times opinion piece. While he did not name Fuentes directly, his message was clear: “If you call Usha Vance, the second lady of the United States of America, a ‘jeet,’ you have no place in the future of the conservative movement.”

Ramaswamy has framed this issue as a test of leadership within conservatism. He stated, “First, conservative leaders should condemn — without hedging — Groyper transgressions. If, like Mr. Fuentes, you believe that Hitler was ‘really f-ing cool,’ or if you publicly call Usha Vance a ‘jeet,’ then you have no place in the conservative movement, period.”

He emphasized that this issue transcends performative outrage, aiming instead to prevent the legitimization of such un-American animus. “The point isn’t to clutch pearls, but to prevent the gradual legitimization of this un-American animus. This online edgelording reminds me of toddlers testing their parents’ limits: The job of a real Republican leader is to set firm boundaries for young followers, as a good father does for a transgressive son,” Ramaswamy explained.

In contrast, Vice President JD Vance shifted the focus from racist language to what he described as systemic discrimination. He remarked, “You don’t have to apologize for being white anymore.”

Vance went on to draw a distinction between offensive slurs and policies that he believes have real-world consequences. “It pisses me off that Fuentes calls my kids ‘jeet,’ and I appreciate that Ro Khanna would never do that,” he said. “You know what pisses me off a million times more? That Ro Khanna, AOC, and Chris Murphy would deny them jobs and opportunities because they have the wrong skin color.”

Usha Vance, JD Vance’s wife, is notable for being the first Indian American and Hindu Second Lady of the United States. Born in California to Telugu Indian immigrant parents who practice Hinduism, her visibility alongside Vance has made her a target for online attacks.

A 2024 analysis by All In Together examined the scale of gendered and race-based attacks directed at Usha Vance across major social media platforms. The study identified approximately 1,800 unique public posts and around 16,000 posts, replies, and shares on platforms such as X, Instagram, and TikTok containing derogatory remarks between January 1 and August 11, 2024. Collectively, this content had a potential reach of nearly 216 million accounts.

The report noted recurring themes in the online abuse. A significant portion referenced Nick Fuentes’ criticism of JD Vance for having an “Indian wife,” which accounted for about 13% of the posts analyzed. The most common line of attack, making up around 33% of the total, centered on insinuations that the Vance family’s son, Vivek, was named after Vivek Ramaswamy. Nearly 6% of the posts went further, accusing Usha Vance of links to Hindu nationalism.

All In Together, which conducted the analysis, describes itself as a non-profit organization focused on “encouraging, equipping, educating, and empowering voting-age women to participate fully in America’s civic and political life,” according to its official website.

The ongoing discourse surrounding Usha Vance’s treatment highlights the broader challenges faced by public figures in the political arena, particularly those from diverse backgrounds. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the conservative movement will navigate the complexities of identity and extremism in its ranks.

According to All In Together, the analysis underscores the urgent need for a unified stance against racism and discrimination within political discourse.

FBI Issues Warning About Scam Involving Fake Kidnapping Photos

The FBI warns that cybercriminals are using stolen family photos from social media to create fake proof-of-life images in virtual kidnapping scams, exploiting fear to extort ransom payments.

The FBI has issued a warning about a troubling new scam that transforms family photos into tools for extortion. Cybercriminals are stealing images from social media accounts, altering them, and using them as fake proof-of-life in virtual kidnapping schemes. These scams do not involve actual abductions; instead, they rely on fear, urgency, and convincing imagery to pressure victims into paying ransom before they can think clearly.

Typically, scammers initiate contact through a text message, claiming they have kidnapped a loved one and demanding immediate payment for their release. To enhance the credibility of their threats, they send altered photos taken from social media. The FBI notes that these images may be sent using timed messages, limiting the time victims have to scrutinize them. The urgency is often accompanied by threats of extreme violence if the ransom is not paid promptly, aiming to shut down rational thought.

When victims take a moment to assess the situation, they may notice inconsistencies in the altered images. The FBI highlights several warning signs, such as missing scars or tattoos, unusual body proportions, or details that do not align with reality. Scammers may also spoof a loved one’s phone number, making the message appear even more credible. Reports on platforms like Reddit indicate that this tactic is already being employed in real-world scenarios.

Virtual kidnapping scams are effective because they exploit human emotions. Fear compels individuals to act quickly, especially when the message seems to come from someone they trust. The FBI points out that criminals often use publicly available information to personalize their threats. Even benign posts, such as missing person searches, can provide valuable details for scammers.

To protect yourself and your family, the FBI recommends several precautionary measures. Staying calm is one of the most effective defenses. Taking a moment to slow down can help you identify red flags and avoid costly mistakes.

When scammers have access to your photos, phone numbers, and personal information, they can leverage fear to manipulate you. To mitigate this risk, consider the following steps:

First, review the privacy settings on all social media platforms you use. Setting your profiles to private ensures that only trusted friends and family can view your photos, posts, and personal updates. Since virtual kidnapping scams heavily rely on publicly visible images, limiting access makes it more difficult for criminals to steal photos and create fake proof-of-life images.

Avoid posting real-time travel updates, daily routines, or detailed family information. Even seemingly innocuous close-up photos that reveal tattoos, scars, or locations can provide scammers with useful material. The less context criminals have, the harder it becomes for them to craft a convincing threat.

Installing strong antivirus software on your devices—computers, phones, and tablets—is also crucial. Robust protection can block phishing links, malicious downloads, and spyware often associated with scam campaigns. Keeping your operating system and security tools updated helps close security gaps that criminals exploit to gather personal data.

Data brokers collect and sell personal information obtained from public records and online activity. Utilizing a data removal service can help locate and eliminate your details from these databases. While no service can guarantee complete removal of your data from the internet, employing a data removal service is a prudent choice. These services actively monitor and systematically erase your personal information from numerous websites, providing peace of mind and reducing the risk of scammers cross-referencing data from breaches with information available on the dark web.

Additionally, review older public photo albums and remove images that clearly display faces from multiple angles. Avoid posting large collections of high-resolution facial photos publicly. Scammers often require multiple images to convincingly alter photos, so reducing the availability of facial data weakens their ability to manipulate images.

Establishing a simple verification plan with loved ones before an emergency occurs can also be beneficial. This may include a shared code word, a callback rule, or a second trusted contact. Scammers thrive on panic, so having a predetermined method to verify safety provides a steady point of reference when emotions run high.

Contact your mobile carrier to inquire about SIM protection or a port-out PIN. This precaution helps prevent criminals from hijacking phone numbers or spoofing calls and texts. Since many fake kidnapping scams begin with messages that appear to come from a loved one, securing phone accounts adds an essential layer of protection.

If you receive a threat, save screenshots, phone numbers, images, and message details. Do not engage further with the sender. Instead, report the incident to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center. Even if no money is lost, reporting helps investigators track patterns and warn others.

Virtual kidnapping scams illustrate how quickly personal photos can be weaponized. Criminals do not need real victims when fear alone can drive action. Taking the time to verify claims, limiting what you share online, and strengthening your digital defenses can significantly reduce your risk. Awareness and preparation remain your best protection against these insidious scams.

For further information on this topic, refer to the FBI’s guidelines and recommendations.

According to Fox News, staying informed and vigilant is crucial in combating these emerging threats.

Scientists Anticipate Underwater Volcano Eruption Off Oregon Coast

Scientists predict that the Axial Seamount, an underwater volcano located 300 miles off the Oregon coast, may erupt later this year, but it poses no threat to land or seismic stability.

The Axial Seamount, an underwater volcano situated over 4,900 feet beneath the Pacific Ocean and 300 miles off the coast of Oregon, is showing signs that it could erupt later this year. This would mark the first eruption since 2015, according to experts from the University of Washington’s College of the Environment.

The volcano is a product of a geological phenomenon known as a hot spot, where molten material rises from the Earth’s mantle into the crust. As tectonic plates shift over this stationary hot spot, it leads to the formation of long chains of volcanoes over time.

“Over two-thirds of the Earth’s surface was formed by volcanic eruptions at these mid-ocean ridges,” said Maya Tolstoy, a marine geophysicist and dean of the university’s College of the Environment. “Axial Seamount is a direct result of these fundamental processes that continue to shape our planet today.”

Despite the potential for an eruption, scientists have assured the public that there is no cause for alarm. “Axial Seamount is much too deep and far from shore for people on land to even notice when it erupts,” the university blog post states. “An eruption at Axial Seamount also has nothing to do with seismic activity on land, so Pacific Northwesterners don’t need to worry about this event triggering a major earthquake or tsunami.”

The initial indication of an impending eruption will be a significant increase in earthquake activity in the surrounding area. Currently, the volcano has already surpassed the inflation levels observed in 2015, although earthquake activity remains relatively low.

“We’re seeing 200 to 300 earthquakes per day, with some spikes around 1,000 per day due to the tides,” explained Deborah Kelley, a professor at the UW School of Oceanography and director of the Regional Cabled Array. “If what we learned in 2015 is correct, I would expect to see more than 2,000 per day for a few months before the eruption.”

The earthquakes are a result of magma moving toward the surface. “That period lasts about an hour, and then the magma reaches the surface,” said William Wilcock, a professor at the UW School of Oceanography. “Lava flows spread across the caldera, and lava-filled fissures open up to the north or the south, reaching as far as 40 kilometers (about 25 miles).”

Following the initial eruption, seismic activity is expected to decrease quickly over the next few days, although the eruption itself may continue at a slower pace for about a month.

As scientists continue to monitor the situation, they emphasize that the eruption of Axial Seamount will not pose any threat to coastal communities or the broader Pacific Northwest region, allowing residents to remain at ease.

For more information, refer to the blog post from the University of Washington’s College of the Environment.

California Ensures Comprehensive Maternal Care Amid Nationwide Health Cuts

California is expanding maternal health care through Medi-Cal, offering comprehensive benefits regardless of immigration status, even as federal health programs face cuts nationwide.

As federal health programs face potential cuts, California is taking significant steps to enhance maternal health care through its Medi-Cal program. The state now provides one of the most comprehensive maternal health benefit packages in the nation, ensuring that pregnant individuals have access to essential services.

Under the current Medi-Cal policy, pregnant Californians can receive full-scope coverage from the start of their pregnancy through 12 months postpartum, regardless of their immigration status. However, many families remain unaware that they qualify for this critical coverage.

During a December 4 briefing hosted by American Community Media, leaders from the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) discussed the expansion of access to maternal and reproductive health care. The panel included Raquel Saunders, MS, Section Chief of Medi-Cal Benefits and Legislation; Sarah Gilbert, Chief of the Office of Family Planning; and Eva Goodfriend-Reaño, Certified Nurse Midwife and Midwifery Clinical Chief at Alameda Health System.

The briefing highlighted the importance of early access to care and the availability of services for all, regardless of immigration status. The panel emphasized that Medi-Cal now covers midwife and doula services, providing families with more birthing options beyond traditional hospital settings, which can lead to improved maternal health outcomes.

California also offers the Family Planning Access, Care, and Treatment (Family PACT) program, a no-cost family planning initiative that complements Medi-Cal to strengthen maternal and reproductive care. The panel reassured attendees that undocumented Californians can safely access these services, even as care options become increasingly limited in other states.

Raquel Sanders addressed concerns among communities, particularly immigrants and families with varying immigration statuses, regarding changes to Medi-Cal and its impact on their care. She stated, “We understand that many in our community are feeling uncertain about upcoming changes to medical care and how those changes may impact their families.”

However, she clarified that all pregnant individuals, regardless of immigration status, are eligible for full-scope Medi-Cal from the beginning of their pregnancy through 12 months after the baby is born.

In recent years, Medi-Cal has expanded maternal health services and introduced new care options. Programs like CalAIM and the Birthing Care Pathway are designed to improve access to care, reduce maternal complications, and provide culturally responsive support for pregnant and postpartum members.

Children and youth under the age of 19 are also eligible for full-scope Medi-Cal, which helps families access essential services such as prenatal checkups, birth planning, and mental health care, including support for postpartum depression.

The DHCS has developed easy-to-understand flyers to help families navigate the wide range of maternal health services available. These resources assist members in choosing the care they need and understanding the different types of maternal care providers, including OBGYNs, midwives, and doulas.

Since January 2023, Medi-Cal has covered doula services, which provide emotional and physical support during pregnancy, labor, birth, and postpartum. Sanders noted, “The doula and midwifery care are helping to reshape the maternal healthcare landscape and expand culturally responsive options for Medi-Cal members.” Doulas also assist after miscarriage or abortion, provide birth planning and lactation support, and help connect members to community resources.

Medi-Cal covers initial visits, up to eight additional visits, support during labor, and two extended postpartum visits, with the option for up to nine extra postpartum visits based on provider recommendations. The DHCS maintains a directory of Medi-Cal-enrolled doulas by county, detailing languages spoken and specialties to help members find appropriate care.

Sanders emphasized that all pregnant individuals remain eligible for full-scope Medi-Cal services, including preventive dental care, regardless of immigration status. Midwifery services are also included, with certified nurse midwives and licensed midwives providing care for healthy, low-risk pregnancies. They offer prenatal checkups, personalized advice, and emotional support, delivering babies in hospitals, birth centers, or at home.

Midwives do not perform surgeries like C-sections but play a crucial role in ensuring safe pregnancies and healthy births. Together, Medi-Cal, CalAIM, doulas, and midwives provide accessible, culturally sensitive maternal care, ensuring that all pregnant Californians receive the support they need for a healthy pregnancy and safe postpartum recovery.

CalAIM and community supports further assist pregnant Medi-Cal members in addressing challenges that may affect their health, such as housing, food, and transportation. These services aim to meet individuals where they are and support their well-being before, during, and after pregnancy.

Community health workers, often referred to as promotoras or peer navigators, help Medi-Cal members understand their benefits, schedule appointments, and connect to essential services like prenatal care and mental health support. These workers build trust and improve health outcomes by sharing similar cultural backgrounds and languages with the communities they serve.

Sarah Gilbert, overseeing the Office of Family Planning, highlighted the importance of the Family PACT program in maternal health. “The program plays a vital role in helping individuals plan spacing and maintain healthy pregnancies when they are ready to have children,” she stated.

Family PACT provides contraceptive and reproductive health services to income-eligible Californians, regardless of immigration status, serving those with incomes at or below 200% of the federal poverty level. The program is designed for individuals without health insurance or those facing barriers to accessing reproductive health services.

Enrollment in Family PACT is quick and easy, allowing individuals to sign up the same day they receive care at participating clinics or apply online. All services are free and confidential, with no immigration-related questions asked, ensuring that individuals can seek care without fear of jeopardizing their public charge status.

Family PACT offers a broad range of services, including education and counseling, assistance in choosing birth control, and access to all FDA-approved contraceptive methods. The program also provides reproductive health screenings, such as pregnancy tests and cervical cancer screenings, supporting informed decisions about family planning and maternal health.

In 2023, Family PACT served approximately 350,000 clients through around 1,200 provider locations statewide, making it a vital resource for accessible reproductive health care. Many clinics offer services in multiple languages, ensuring that care is both accessible and culturally appropriate.

Goodfriend-Reaño elaborated on the essential role of midwives in maternal and newborn care in California, noting that midwives deliver about 13% of vaginal births. They provide comprehensive care throughout the pregnancy journey, from preconception and prenatal care to birth and postpartum support.

With Medi-Cal now covering midwifery care for the full year after birth, midwives can support postpartum health, including addressing postpartum depression and anxiety through therapy and support groups. This continuous care during a critical time helps families recover and thrive.

Goodfriend-Reaño emphasized that California’s health care services are designed to care for everyone, regardless of immigration status. “Our community clinics, our FQHCs, our safety net hospitals, our county systems are set up to take care of everybody,” she stated.

By providing continuous, personalized care from preconception to one year postpartum, midwives play a crucial role in ensuring healthy pregnancies, safe births, and robust support for families across California.

“California will continue to invest in the health, dignity, and autonomy of its residents,” Gilbert concluded. “Together, we can ensure that every person has the support they need to make the reproductive health choices that are right for them,” according to Source Name.

Vivek Ramaswamy Faces Controversial ‘Anchor Baby’ Attack Amid Campaign

Vivek Ramaswamy faces backlash from far-right figures, including Nick Fuentes, after defending American identity in a New York Times op-ed, igniting a debate over race and immigration.

Vivek Ramaswamy, an Indian American entrepreneur and former Republican presidential candidate, has come under fire from far-right commentator Nick Fuentes following his recent opinion piece in the New York Times. The backlash highlights ongoing tensions within the American right regarding race, immigration, and national identity.

In his op-ed, Ramaswamy argued that the United States is not defined by ethnicity or bloodlines but rather by a shared set of civic ideals. His assertion, which promotes a values-based vision of American identity, drew sharp criticism from white nationalist factions, with Fuentes labeling him an “anchor baby” and questioning his legitimacy as an American.

Ramaswamy responded to the criticism on social media platform X, stating, “American identity isn’t a scalar quality that varies based on your ancestry. It’s binary: either you’re an American, or you’re not.” He emphasized that true American identity is rooted in belief in the rule of law, freedom of conscience and expression, colorblind meritocracy, and allegiance to the U.S. Constitution.

Fuentes escalated the situation with a provocative post on X, where he dismissed Ramaswamy’s arguments by reiterating the derogatory term “anchor baby.” He claimed that individuals like Ramaswamy, whom he views as lacking legitimate ties to the nation, should not lecture others on what it means to be American.

In response to Ramaswamy’s op-ed, some users on X expressed their disdain, with one user accusing him of being unqualified to discuss American identity due to his background. Another user criticized Ramaswamy’s views as overly simplistic, arguing that America is a distinct culture that should not be diluted by vague principles of inclusion.

Ramaswamy’s op-ed explicitly challenged identity politics rooted in “lineage, blood, and soil,” which he associated with white nationalist ideologies. He also called out the influence of the Groyper movement, an online group that promotes a white-first vision of America.

The phrase “either you’re an American or you’re not” has sparked significant debate, with some immigrants and civil rights advocates arguing that such a binary framing overlooks the complex and pluralistic history of the United States.

The term “anchor baby” is often used derogatorily to describe children born in countries with birthright citizenship, suggesting that they are born primarily to help their families gain legal status. Ramaswamy himself was born in Cincinnati, Ohio, to parents who immigrated from Kerala, India. His father, V. Ganapathy Ramaswamy, is an engineer, while his mother, Geetha Ramaswamy, is a geriatric psychiatrist.

This incident underscores the ongoing cultural and political battles within the American right, as figures like Ramaswamy advocate for a more inclusive understanding of national identity, while others cling to exclusionary narratives that emphasize racial and ethnic purity.

As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how these discussions will shape the future of American conservatism and the broader discourse on immigration and identity in the United States.

According to The American Bazaar, the fallout from Ramaswamy’s op-ed illustrates the deep divisions within the Republican Party and the challenges faced by leaders who advocate for a more inclusive vision of America.

Indiaspora Highlights Global Impact and Leadership in Indian-American Community

Indiaspora highlights a transformative year of global impact, innovation, and community leadership in its annual review, showcasing initiatives that unite the Indian diaspora across the world.

Indiaspora has released a comprehensive year-in-review that highlights its most influential programs, global convenings, and community-driven initiatives that shaped 2025. From Abu Dhabi to San Francisco, Singapore to Sydney, the organization has continued to advance its mission of positioning the global Indian diaspora as a “force for good.”

A Global Forum Rooted in Service

The year commenced with the inaugural Indiaspora Forum for Good in Abu Dhabi, a gathering that united leaders from over 30 countries. Anchored in the principle of Seva—selfless service—the event featured prominent figures such as FedEx CEO Raj Subramaniam, Nobel Laureate Kailash Satyarthi, and UAE Minister of Tolerance and Coexistence Sheikh Nahayan bin Mabarak Al Nahyan.

“The depth of expertise in the room created an unprecedented platform for collaboration,” an Indiaspora spokesperson noted, emphasizing the forum’s role in shaping cross-border impact.

The event also marked the release of the BCG-Indiaspora report, “From Ancient Legacy to Modern Triumphs,” which spotlighted the 3.9 million-strong Indian community in the UAE and its significant economic and cultural contributions.

AI Leadership on the Global Stage

Indiaspora’s influence in the technology sector surged with the Indiaspora AI Summit 2025, held at Dubai’s Museum of the Future. The summit featured a fireside chat with Navin Chaddha on “The Era of Collaborative Intelligence” and convened global leaders to discuss emerging AI frameworks and innovation ecosystems.

The organization also expanded its AI footprint through partnerships, including a “Women in AI” event in the Bay Area and support for the AI Impact Pre-Summit Conference at the Computer History Museum in California. As an official partner of Dubai AI Week, Indiaspora helped bring together over 5,000 delegates to explore the future of AI policy and technology.

“AI is not just a technological shift—it is a societal transformation,” one participant reflected. “Indiaspora is ensuring the diaspora has a seat at the table.”

Climate Action With a Global Lens

The Indiaspora Climate Summit 2025, themed “Climate 360: Global Perspectives, Unified Action,” convened sustainability experts, policymakers, and community leaders for a virtual gathering focused on energy transition, biodiversity, agriculture, and community resilience.

Speakers emphasized the urgency of collective action. “Climate change is not a distant threat—it is a lived reality for millions,” one panelist stated. “Diaspora communities have a unique role in driving global solutions.”

Philanthropy and Social Impact

In partnership with the India Philanthropy Alliance, Indiaspora hosted a high-level Philanthropy Summit at the Consulate General of India in San Francisco. Speakers such as Desh Deshpande, Yamini Mishra, and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi offered insights into the evolving landscape of global giving.

“Philanthropy is no longer just about generosity—it is about strategy, scale, and systems change,” Deshpande remarked during the session.

Indiaspora also advanced civic engagement through meetings with global leaders, including New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, and participation in major conferences such as the South Asian Bar Association (SABA) Conference and Asia Society’s “Envision India” forum.

Celebrating Culture and Community

Indiaspora’s Diwali celebrations spanned San Francisco, Washington D.C., Sydney, and London, bringing together diplomats, business leaders, and community members. At the Sydney Cricket Ground, Indiaspora Founder’s Circle member Ashok Jacob delivered a keynote on the future of Australia’s Indian diaspora, while in London, an elegant dinner at the House of Commons sparked discussions on geopolitics and global leadership.

“Diwali is a reminder of our shared heritage and our shared responsibility,” said MR Rangaswami, Founder and Chairman of Indiaspora, during the San Francisco celebration.

Research and Thought Leadership

A major highlight of the year was Indiaspora’s research on Indian American philanthropy, revealing more than $3 billion in contributions to U.S. universities. The study underscores a powerful trend: Indian Americans giving back to the institutions that shaped their professional journeys.

“This is not just philanthropy—it is legacy building,” the report notes.

Roadshows and Global Engagement

Indiaspora’s Roadshow series connected diaspora leaders across Auckland, Mauritius, Melbourne, Mumbai, New Delhi, Sydney, and South Africa, building momentum for the upcoming Indiaspora Forum 2026 in Bengaluru.

In Singapore, the organization hosted “The Global Chessboard” panel and its second “Lead With Women” program, while in the UK, it convened CEO roundtables, women’s leadership events, and strategic discussions on UK-US-India relations.

Looking Ahead

With preparations underway for the 2026 Indiaspora Forum in Bengaluru, the organization is poised to deepen its global impact. As the year’s report reflects, Indiaspora continues to serve as a bridge—connecting communities, amplifying voices, and shaping a shared future.

“Our mission is simple,” the organization emphasized. “To inspire, to connect, and to lead with purpose.”

According to Global Net News, Indiaspora’s initiatives have significantly impacted communities worldwide, fostering collaboration and innovation.

Top Immigration Stories That Captivated Readers in 2025

In 2025, immigration stories resonated deeply with Indian Americans, reflecting the complexities of policy changes and their impact on lives, careers, and community dynamics.

For millions of Indian immigrants, stories about U.S. immigration are not merely headlines; they serve as essential survival guides. Each policy shift, court ruling, or executive order significantly impacts their lives, influencing where they can work, whether their families can remain together, and the overall security of their futures. In this landscape of uncertainty, these narratives have become a daily companion.

A minor adjustment in visa regulations can mean the difference between a stable career and sudden unemployment for H-1B professionals and their spouses on H-4 EADs. Even legal residents find themselves grappling with concerns about profiling, surveillance, and contentious policies, such as the renewed debate over birthright citizenship for children born on U.S. soil.

Ultimately, these stories transcend immigration; they provide real-time updates on the rules governing identity, opportunity, and belonging in America.

One of the most-read articles, “Citizenship Verification Requirement to Send Money Home Raises Alarm Among Indian Americans,” struck a chord within the Indian American community, garnering over 100,000 views. This piece highlighted a controversial proposal in the One Big Beautiful Bill that would require even U.S. citizens to verify their citizenship before sending money abroad, imposing a hefty 3.5% tax on remittances from foreign workers in the U.S. This raised serious concerns about the ability to support families back in India.

Another significant development was a presidential proclamation introducing a $100,000 fee for specific H-1B visa petitions, which sent shockwaves through the immigrant workforce. Our follow-up article, “USCIS Issues H-1B Visa Fee Update & Exceptions,” attracted thousands of views as Indian Americans sought urgent clarity on who would be affected and who might be exempt.

The first major wave of Indian immigrants in the U.S. is redefining retirement, aging, and senior living, thousands of miles from their homeland. Our story, “Indian Immigrants in Florida Are Growing Old in Ways Their Parents Never Did,” provided a compelling look into Anand Vihar, a culturally rooted retirement community designed specifically for Indian American immigrants. This article quickly became a favorite among readers.

In a powerful op-ed titled “Enough! Ajay Bhutoria Slams ‘Go Back to India’ Abuse,” the author addressed the rising tide of anti-Indian American sentiment fueled by extremist rhetoric. The piece resonated with many, highlighting a striking contradiction: despite Indian Americans being among the nation’s highest tax-paying communities and contributing significantly to various sectors, they increasingly face targeted hostility.

Experts caution that sweeping immigration reforms threaten the rule of law and due process, leaving millions caught in the crossfire. As aggressive ICE tactics instill chaos and fear within immigrant communities, our article “Legal Immigrants, Green Card Holders, Naturalized Citizens—Who’s Safe from Deportation?” resonated widely, drawing many readers concerned about the implications of current deportation strategies.

These stories reflect the ongoing struggles and resilience of the Indian immigrant community, illustrating how immigration policies shape their lives and futures.

According to India Currents, the narratives surrounding immigration continue to evolve, underscoring the importance of awareness and advocacy in these challenging times.

Fundraiser for Australian Hero Who Disarmed Terrorist Exceeds $2.6 Million

More than $2.6 million has been raised for Ahmed al Ahmed, who heroically disarmed a gunman during a mass shooting at a Hanukkah event on Bondi Beach, Sydney, Australia.

In a remarkable display of courage, Ahmed al Ahmed has garnered over $2.6 million in donations following his heroic actions during a mass shooting at a Hanukkah event on Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia. The tragic incident occurred on December 14, resulting in the deaths of at least 15 individuals.

A GoFundMe campaign was initiated shortly after the attack, aimed at supporting al Ahmed, a Syrian-born Australian Muslim. He became a symbol of bravery when footage emerged showing him tackling and disarming one of the alleged gunmen. As of Sunday morning, the fundraiser had amassed $2.64 million through nearly 45,000 contributions.

The fundraiser’s description highlights al Ahmed’s selfless actions during a moment of chaos. “In a moment of chaos and danger, Ahmed al Ahmed stepped forward without hesitation,” it states. “His actions were selfless, instinctive, and undeniably heroic, taken without regard for his own safety.” Reports indicate that al Ahmed sustained two gunshot wounds while protecting others during the attack.

Organizers of the campaign expressed their gratitude for al Ahmed’s bravery, emphasizing the importance of supporting someone who demonstrated “incredible courage when it mattered most.” Footage from the scene shows al Ahmed, a father of two young daughters aged 5 and 6, sneaking up behind the attacker as shots are fired off-camera. He then tackles the gunman and wrestles the weapon away, ultimately holding the attacker at gunpoint.

One of the fundraiser’s organizers, social media influencer Zachery Dereniowski, visited al Ahmed in a Sydney hospital on Friday to present him with a check for $2.5 million, the amount raised at that time. In a heartfelt moment captured on video, al Ahmed appeared overwhelmed by the gesture, asking from his hospital bed, “I deserve it?” Dereniowski responded, “Every penny.”

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also paid a visit to al Ahmed earlier this week, commending him as an “Australian hero.” In a message shared on social media platform X, Albanese stated, “You put yourself at risk to save others, running towards danger on Bondi Beach and disarming a terrorist. In the worst of times, we see the best of Australians. And that’s exactly what we saw on Sunday night. On behalf of every Australian, I say thank you.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised al Ahmed’s actions as “brave,” while Chris Minns, the Premier of New South Wales, remarked that al Ahmed’s “incredible bravery no doubt saved countless lives.”

The Australian government is currently investigating the shooting as a terror attack specifically targeting the Jewish community. Authorities have charged a 24-year-old man, who allegedly carried out the attack alongside his 50-year-old father, who died at the scene, with murder.

As the community continues to rally around al Ahmed, his actions serve as a poignant reminder of bravery in the face of danger. The overwhelming support he has received reflects the deep appreciation for his selfless act during a time of tragedy.

According to Fox News, the ongoing investigation into the attack underscores the serious nature of the incident and the commitment of authorities to ensure justice is served.

Trump and Susie Wild Host Engaging Show for Indian-American Audience

In a revealing Vanity Fair interview, Susie Wiles, Donald Trump’s chief of staff, discusses her boss’s personality, the dynamics within the White House, and the challenges facing the administration.

Susie Wiles, known as the “Ice Maiden” by Donald Trump, has been a steady force in the White House, contrasting sharply with the chaos of Trump’s first term. In a recent Vanity Fair interview, the 68-year-old political operative shared insights about her boss and the unique personalities that make up his administration.

Wiles compared Trump to her late father, legendary sportscaster Pat Summerall, suggesting that he possesses “an alcoholic’s personality.” She described this trait as a mindset where Trump believes there is “nothing he can’t do. Nothing, zero, nothing.” This characterization raises questions about the psychological underpinnings of Trump’s leadership style.

In her candid remarks, Wiles labeled Vice President JD Vance a “conspiracy theorist” and described White House budget director Russell Vought as “a right-wing absolute zealot.” She also referred to Elon Musk, a former ally of Trump, as “an odd, odd duck,” acknowledging Musk’s reputation as a genius and his reported use of ketamine.

Wiles revealed that significant disagreements have arisen within the administration, particularly regarding the implementation of tariffs. She admitted that the administration needs to “look harder” at its mass deportation processes and that she had to align herself with Trump’s decision to extend blanket pardons to those involved in the January 6 Capitol riots.

Despite her attempts to establish a “loose agreement” with Trump to end political retribution after 90 days, Wiles ultimately conceded that Trump often has his way. “In some cases, it may look like retribution,” she acknowledged, adding, “And there may be an element of that from time to time. Who would blame him? Not me.”

Wiles also touched on Trump’s controversial relationship with the late Jeffrey Epstein, criticizing Attorney General Pam Bondi for failing to recognize the fervor of Trump’s right-wing supporters regarding Epstein’s files. Just days after the interview, the Justice Department released hundreds of thousands of pages of documents related to Epstein, but many were heavily redacted, raising concerns about transparency.

Despite Trump’s well-documented friendship with Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s, his name was rarely mentioned in the released documents, while former President Bill Clinton was prominently featured.

The late-night talk show circuit had a field day with Wiles’ interview. Jimmy Kimmel humorously referred to her as “the future former chief of staff,” prompting speculation about whether Trump and Wiles were engaging in a good cop-bad cop routine.

Wiles dismissed the Vanity Fair article as “a disingenuously framed hit piece” on both herself and the Trump administration, yet she did not dispute any of the facts or quotes presented. Trump came to her defense, calling her “fantastic.”

In a surprising turn, Trump delivered a succinct sales pitch on television the night following Wiles’ interview, highlighting the accomplishments of his first term and the challenges ahead. He blamed his predecessor, Joe Biden, for various issues, claiming, “Good evening, America. Eleven months ago, I inherited a mess, and I’m fixing it.” He went on to assert that the U.S. is “poised for an economic boom the likes of which the world has never seen.”

Wiles played a key role in encouraging Trump to deliver this rare prime-time address. According to a television pool report, she reminded him of the time constraint, saying, “I told you 20 minutes,” to which Trump responded by sticking to the schedule.

In a move that reflects his penchant for branding, Trump renamed the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to the Trump-Kennedy Center, following a vote by his hand-picked board of trustees. This change, however, may require congressional approval.

Additionally, new plaques were installed under presidential portraits on Trump’s “Presidential Walk of Fame” in the White House colonnade. Many of these plaques, reportedly written by Trump himself, present a distorted version of history. For example, the plaque under the portrait of “Sleepy Joe Biden” labels him “the worst President in American History,” while the one under “Barack Hussein Obama” calls him “one of the most divisive figures in American history.”

As for the funding of these plaques and whether government resources were used for their installation, the White House has not provided any information.

In response to Trump’s actions, California Governor Gavin Newsom took to social media to mockingly post his own version of a Trump plaque, stating, “DONALD IS FINISHED – HE IS NO LONGER ‘HOT’… DONNIE J MISSED ‘THE DEADLINE’ (WHOOPS!) AND NOW I RUN THE SHOW.”

Meanwhile, a social media account humorously dubbed ‘DiaperDiplomacy’ shared an AI-generated, childlike version of Trump’s speech, depicting him boasting about various policies while poking fun at his leadership style.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, Wiles’ revelations and Trump’s ongoing branding efforts highlight the complexities and controversies surrounding this administration.

According to Vanity Fair, the dynamics within the White House remain as unpredictable as ever.

A Life of Care: The Untold Stories of Indian-American Caregivers

Rosa, a dedicated nanny in New York City, faces the difficult decision to self-deport to Guatemala after years of fear and uncertainty as an undocumented immigrant.

For over two decades, Rosa has been a nurturing presence in the lives of American families in New York City, providing essential childcare that allows parents to work. Despite her unwavering commitment to her job and the families she cares for, Rosa is now preparing to leave the United States. She plans to self-deport to Guatemala, while her partner of 16 years, a construction worker, will return to Colombia. “Then he can come visit me,” she said.

Rosa’s decision comes amid a climate of fear and anxiety for many undocumented immigrants. “At least we will not have that feeling that someone is chasing us, coming after us. Because that’s how we feel, both of us,” she explained. “Every day on Spanish TV the ads say, ‘If you’re illegal, we’re going to get you. We’re going to kick you out.’ That’s the message we hear every day. It affects you.”

Reflecting on her experiences, Rosa likened the emotional toll to “a little drop of water hitting on a stone. Sooner or later it starts making a hole.” She believes that many people are unaware of the struggles faced by immigrants like her.

Before arriving in the United States, Rosa was a single mother of two in Guatemala, where she taught at a language school for tourists and sold jewelry for a U.S.-based company. However, a recession left her without work and struggling to provide for her young children. In search of better opportunities, she accepted an invitation from a childhood boyfriend, a U.S. citizen living in New York, leaving her children in the care of her mother until she could secure visas for them. Unfortunately, once in New York, her boyfriend was unable to support her, and her tourist visa expired.

“I had nothing, so I began looking for work,” Rosa recalled. As an undocumented immigrant, she took on jobs as a nanny and house cleaner, earning enough to send money back home to support her children. “It was good money, and I was sending money back to feed my kids,” she said.

Rosa has heard stories of mothers who attempt to smuggle their children across the border, but she has always rejected that idea. “I wouldn’t do that. It’s too hard, too dangerous,” she said. “I wanted to do it the legal way, but I couldn’t. I’ve been talking to lawyers since I got here.”

Her children have always been her top priority. “I couldn’t go back because we needed the money. They needed the money to go to school.” Now, her son is an engineer, and her daughter is graduating with a law degree, both of whom have been able to avoid the overcrowded public schools and violence that plague many teenagers in Central America.

“You have no idea how many nights I cried because I miss them, because I want to hold them,” she said, expressing the deep emotional pain of separation from her children.

Throughout her time in the United States, Rosa has cared for numerous American children across four families, forming strong bonds with them. This connection has made it even harder for her to consider leaving. “I have to be honest: I love children,” she said. “They are so curious, so creative. They are really honest with you, with their feelings, with their facts. And they learn from you.”

Rosa has always fulfilled her responsibilities as a taxpayer, using an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) to contribute to programs like Social Security and Medicare, despite knowing she will never benefit from them. She has never been in trouble with the law, stating, “I’ve never been in any trouble.”

As of September, Rosa continued to work, honoring her commitments to the families that depend on her. However, the constant stress and fear of deportation have taken a toll on her well-being. She has altered her daily routines to avoid rush hour and has relied on a taxi driver friend for alerts about Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activities.

“It’s not fair that people who come and work are threatened, scared, humiliated,” she said. “I would like the freedom to do my work with happiness as usual, without the worry of who is going to take me away, who is going to hurt me and treat me like an animal.”

“I’m sad to go home, but we have to have freedom, not live in a cage,” she concluded, highlighting the emotional weight of her impending departure.

Rosa’s story sheds light on the challenges faced by immigrant workers in the United States, particularly in the childcare sector, where many families rely on their services. The emotional and psychological toll of living in fear of deportation is a reality for countless individuals like Rosa, who contribute significantly to the fabric of American society.

According to American Immigration Council, the experiences of immigrants like Rosa underscore the urgent need for comprehensive immigration reform that addresses the complexities of their lives and contributions.

U.S. Lawmakers Call for Reversal of USCIS Immigration Case Pause

More than 100 Democratic lawmakers are urging the Trump administration to lift an indefinite pause on immigration and citizenship applications that has adversely affected thousands of vetted immigrants.

WASHINGTON — Over 100 Democratic lawmakers are calling on the Trump administration to immediately reverse an indefinite pause on immigration and citizenship applications. This suspension has disrupted the lives of thousands of legally vetted immigrants from countries affected by President Donald Trump’s latest travel ban.

In a strongly worded letter dated December 18, addressed to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director Joseph Edlow, members of Congress expressed their concerns about the widespread confusion, family separations, and emotional distress caused by this decision. Many applicants had already completed all necessary legal steps toward permanent residency or U.S. citizenship.

The lawmakers highlighted that the announcement made by USCIS on December 2 led to the abrupt suspension of green card processing, the cancellation of naturalization interviews, and the halting of citizenship oath ceremonies. They argue that these actions appear to be based solely on the applicants’ national origin.

“Despite the Trump administration’s claims of going after the ‘worst of the worst,’ it is attacking the very people who have followed every process and undergone extensive and repeated vetting to secure legal status,” the lawmakers wrote. “This sweeping action is unjustified, discriminatory, and inconsistent with our nation’s founding principles.”

The letter was spearheaded by Rep. Pramila Jayapal, the ranking member of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security and Enforcement, along with Rep. Lizzie Fletcher of Texas. It details numerous reports from across the country of immigrants being informed—often without explanation—that their cases had been placed on hold.

In some troubling accounts, lawmakers noted that individuals who had already passed their naturalization exams were removed from oath ceremonies just moments before they were set to formally become U.S. citizens.

“These naturalization ceremonies are a time of celebration, as soon-to-be U.S. citizens welcome their friends and family to witness their achievement,” the letter stated. “To deny this monumental milestone—after years, and sometimes decades, of waiting—is a slap in the face.”

Lawmakers emphasized that many affected applicants had already undergone extensive background checks, security screenings, and moral character reviews, leaving them stunned when their cases were suddenly frozen.

Beyond the human impact, members of Congress criticized USCIS for its lack of transparency regarding the scope and duration of the pause. According to the letter, the agency has not clarified how long the suspension will last, whether additional vetting is being conducted, or why previously approved cases are being reconsidered.

“Without clarity on how long this broad pause will last, soon-to-be citizens will be left in limbo in perpetuity, and families will be forced to remain separated,” the lawmakers warned.

They added that the move has created fear among applicants that falling out of legal status while waiting could expose them to enforcement action, despite having fully complied with U.S. immigration law.

Rep. Angie Craig accused the administration of deliberately obstructing lawful pathways to citizenship, arguing that the policy unfairly targets immigrants who “have followed the law and completed the necessary steps to achieve legal status.”

In their letter, lawmakers demanded detailed responses from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and USCIS by December 31. They requested information on the number of green card, naturalization, and immigration cases affected, how many citizenship ceremonies have been canceled or postponed, whether any new background or security checks are being imposed, and guarantees that applicants will not lose eligibility or face enforcement while waiting.

Reps. Jayapal and Fletcher stated that the decision has “caused chaos across the country,” particularly in immigrant communities that believed they were nearing the end of a long and difficult legal process.

The pause is linked to President Trump’s renewed travel ban, which restricts travel and legal immigration from 19 countries, including Afghanistan, Iran, Somalia, and Yemen. Lawmakers noted that additional countries were later added or subjected to partial restrictions.

This policy revives one of Trump’s most controversial immigration strategies from his first term, when sweeping travel bans triggered mass protests and legal challenges before being upheld in a narrower form by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Critics argue that the current pause goes even further by affecting individuals already inside the United States who had been approved to advance in the legal immigration process.

“No amount of vetting, moral character, or commitment to this country and its democratic values appears to be enough to satisfy this administration,” the lawmakers wrote.

As immigration once again becomes a defining political issue, Democrats assert that the USCIS pause undermines trust in the legal immigration system and sends a chilling message to those who believed that following the rules would lead to stability and citizenship.

With pressure mounting from Congress, immigrant advocacy groups, and affected families, the administration now faces renewed scrutiny over whether it will reverse course or allow the pause to continue indefinitely, leaving thousands of future Americans waiting at the final step, according to Global Net News.

CIA’s Lost Nuclear Device Still Missing on India’s Nanda Devi

Decades after a covert Cold War operation, a nuclear-powered surveillance device remains lost on India’s Nanda Devi, highlighting the complexities of U.S.-India relations during a tense period in history.

At the height of the Cold War in 1965, as China advanced its nuclear weapons program, a remarkable covert operation unfolded in the Indian Himalayas. The United States and India collaborated on a secret mission to monitor Chinese missile tests by placing a nuclear-powered surveillance device atop Nanda Devi, one of India’s most revered peaks, according to The New York Times.

The operation was ambitious. American and Indian climbers were tasked with transporting an antenna, cables, and a compact nuclear generator known as the SNAP 19C to an extreme altitude. This generator contained plutonium, nearly one-third of the amount used in the Nagasaki bomb. While the expedition was officially framed as scientific research, it was, in reality, a Cold War intelligence gamble played out on treacherous terrain.

As the climbers prepared for their final ascent, disaster struck. A sudden blizzard engulfed the mountain, forcing the climbers into a desperate fight for survival. From the advanced base camp below, Captain M.S. Kohli, the Indian officer leading the mission, urged the team over the radio to turn back, emphasizing the urgency of their situation. With no other option, the climbers abandoned the equipment on an icy ledge near Camp Four and retreated downhill.

The nuclear device was never recovered.

The United States never publicly acknowledged the operation. On paper, it was as if nothing had happened. Yet the origins of the mission were surprisingly casual. The idea emerged during a Washington cocktail party where General Curtis LeMay, then head of the U.S. Air Force, conversed with Barry Bishop, a National Geographic photographer and experienced Everest climber. Bishop described how Himalayan peaks provided clear vantage points into Tibet and China. Shortly thereafter, the CIA enlisted him to organize a covert expedition disguised as mountaineering science.

India’s involvement was influenced by lingering fears following its 1962 war with China, although Kohli himself was skeptical from the outset. He dismissed early proposals to place the device on Kanchenjunga as reckless, a sentiment echoed by American climbers involved in the planning. Ultimately, Nanda Devi was selected as a compromise between accessibility and feasibility.

The climb proved to be grueling. Climbers were flown by helicopter to high altitudes with little time for acclimatization. Many fell ill, and few understood the risks associated with the radioactive generator, which emitted warmth that made it oddly appealing to carry. The dangers of the device only became apparent years later.

When the team returned in 1966 to retrieve the device, it had disappeared. An avalanche had swept away the ledge along with the equipment, ice, and rock. Subsequent searches employing radiation detectors and infrared sensors yielded no results.

In the aftermath, both governments acted swiftly to manage the situation. Then-President Jimmy Carter and former Prime Minister Morarji Desai communicated privately to mitigate the issue, with Carter later commending Desai for his handling of what he termed the “Himalayan device problem.” Publicly, both nations maintained silence on the matter.

Today, most of the individuals involved in the operation are elderly or have passed away. The missing nuclear device remains buried somewhere in the high Himalayas, its fate still unknown. Before his death, Kohli reflected on the mission with a sense of quiet remorse, describing it as a sad chapter in his life.

According to The New York Times, the story of the lost nuclear device serves as a reminder of the complex and often secretive nature of international relations during one of the most tense periods in modern history.

Democrats Debate Accountability for Walz Amid Fraud Allegations

Some Democrats are calling for Minnesota Governor Tim Walz to testify before Congress regarding a significant Medicaid fraud scandal that has unfolded under his administration.

Amid growing scrutiny over a large-scale Medicaid fraud scandal in Minnesota, some Democrats are advocating for Governor Tim Walz to testify before Congress. This scandal appears to be more extensive than initially believed, raising questions about accountability within the state’s administration.

Representative Johnny Olszewski, a Democrat from Maryland, emphasized the need for thorough investigations into any instances of fraud. “I think any instance of fraud should be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent, and so the federal government should play an oversight role in federal dollars,” he told Fox News Digital. He further stated that states have a responsibility to ensure proper administration of these programs. “Where there’s fraud, people should be prosecuted for that fraud,” Olszewski added.

When asked whether Walz should be compelled to testify regarding the significant financial losses attributed to fraud during his tenure, Olszewski responded that “anyone” involved in large-scale fraud “should come before Congress and tell us what happened.”

Other Democrats echoed Olszewski’s sentiments, suggesting that Walz should face scrutiny. However, some party members deflected responsibility, instead pointing fingers at former President Donald Trump and the Republican Party. Representative Becca Balint from Vermont remarked, “It is not a partisan issue. I just wish that we could focus on really looking at where the facts take us and not have it be that one side is trying to fight waste, fraud, abuse, and the other isn’t.” She was addressing the need for preventive measures against the kind of extensive fraud witnessed in Minnesota.

Representative Glenn Ivey, also a Democrat from Maryland, noted the ongoing challenges with fraud, stating, “There’s always a fraud issue. That’s why the Department of Justice had a huge civil fraud division that did a lot of great work, and that’s why we have [Inspector Generals] and the like throughout the federal government.” He criticized the Trump administration for eliminating key oversight positions, calling it one of the worst decisions if they were serious about combating waste, fraud, and abuse.

Representative Don Beyer from Virginia offered a different perspective when asked if Walz should testify. “Oh I don’t know that you need the governor to do it. Certainly somebody from Minnesota that has the best insight into what went wrong should,” he said.

In a press conference held on Thursday, federal authorities in Minnesota announced new charges related to the fraud scandal, which has garnered national attention. They indicated that the scope of the crisis extends beyond previous reports, suggesting a more complex web of deceit.

According to reports, Minnesota Democratic lawmakers have received over $50,000 in campaign donations from individuals involved in the fraudulent activities that exploited taxpayer funds intended for child nutrition programs. This revelation has intensified calls for accountability and transparency in the handling of state resources.

The ongoing investigation into the Medicaid fraud scandal raises critical questions about oversight and governance in Minnesota. As the situation develops, the pressure on Governor Walz and other state officials to address these issues and provide answers to the public is likely to increase.

As the scandal unfolds, it remains to be seen how state and federal authorities will respond and whether Governor Walz will ultimately be called to testify regarding the mismanagement of Medicaid funds in Minnesota, according to Fox News Digital.

Putin States Russia Will Avoid New Attacks If Treated With Respect

Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that Russia will not initiate new attacks on other countries if treated “with respect,” while expressing a willingness to end the Ukraine war peacefully.

In a recent televised press conference, Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasized that Moscow would refrain from launching new military operations against other nations, provided his country is treated “with respect.” This statement comes amid ongoing concerns among European nations regarding Russia’s potential security threats, as reported by Agence France-Presse (AFP).

During the annual event, which typically lasts for at least four hours, Putin addressed a range of topics, with a significant focus on the ongoing war in Ukraine. He remarked, “Will there be new special military operations? There will be no operations if you treat us with respect, if you observe our interests, just as we have constantly tried to observe yours.” This phrase, “special military operation,” is how Putin refers to Russia’s military actions in Ukraine.

Putin further asserted that there would be no additional invasions from Russia if other nations do not “cheat us like you cheated us with NATO’s eastward expansion,” a reference to longstanding tensions regarding NATO’s expansion into Eastern Europe, according to the BBC.

Additionally, the Russian leader claimed he is “ready and willing” to conclude the war in Ukraine “peacefully,” although he provided few specifics that would indicate a genuine willingness to compromise in negotiations, as noted by the BBC.

The press conference saw an overwhelming response, with more than 2.5 million questions submitted by reporters and the public. The event is a platform for Putin to address national and international issues, and this year’s focus was heavily skewed towards the conflict in Ukraine, as reported by Reuters.

Putin also conveyed confidence in the progress of Russian military operations, stating, “Our troops are advancing all across the line of contact, faster in some areas or slower in some others, but the enemy is retreating in all sectors.” This assertion comes as the war continues, with the European Union recently agreeing to provide Ukraine with a substantial loan exceeding $105 billion.

As the situation evolves, the international community watches closely, weighing the implications of Putin’s statements and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The Kremlin’s stance reflects a complex interplay of military strategy and diplomatic posturing, with the potential for significant consequences on the global stage.

Fox News Digital’s Alex Nitzberg contributed to this report.

Harvard Dropout Launches Givefront to Support U.S. Nonprofits

Givefront, a fintech startup founded by Harvard dropout Matt Tengtrakool, aims to revolutionize financial management for U.S. nonprofits with tailored solutions that address their unique operational needs.

Over the past decade, fintech startups have significantly transformed how American businesses manage their finances. However, much of this innovation has primarily benefited for-profit companies, leaving nonprofits to contend with outdated financial tools that do not cater to their specific needs.

Enter Givefront, a startup backed by Y Combinator, co-founded by 21-year-old Matt Tengtrakool, a Harvard dropout, and Aidan Sunbury from UC Berkeley. The company’s mission is to create a financial platform specifically designed for nonprofits, ranging from food banks and animal shelters to NGOs, churches, and homeowner associations.

Nonprofits represent approximately 6% of the U.S. economy and handle trillions of dollars annually. Despite this, many organizations still rely on cumbersome financial systems that hinder their operations. Givefront aims to bridge this gap by providing modern tools for spend management, compliance, and reporting, tailored to the unique ways nonprofits operate.

Before launching Givefront, Tengtrakool explored the fintech landscape with a microloan aggregation startup in Nigeria. He also gained firsthand experience working within various nonprofits while studying computer science and statistics at Harvard, even managing some organizations himself. At one nonprofit, he played a key role in scaling fundraising efforts to nearly $500,000. These experiences highlighted a critical issue: nonprofits face stringent regulatory and reporting standards, yet they lack access to the modern financial tools that for-profit companies often take for granted.

“I’ve always been interested in financial systems, and this work fits naturally with that,” Tengtrakool shared in an interview. “While helping run these nonprofits with a few other students, we realized most of them didn’t have adequate financial tools to ensure compliance or protect their tax-exempt status. The tools they relied on were completely out of sync with what’s considered modern in the startup world.”

The initial version of Givefront was developed as an in-house solution to address these challenges. What started as a fix for the nonprofits Tengtrakool was directly involved with quickly garnered interest from local organizations across the United States. As the product evolved, the team honed its focus on creating a single, integrated financial platform designed exclusively for registered nonprofits, a sector that encompasses approximately 1.9 million organizations nationwide.

While Givefront may initially resemble corporate spend tools like Ramp or Brex, its nonprofit-centric approach is what truly sets it apart. Nonprofits operate under constraints that most businesses do not encounter. They must manage restricted and unrestricted funding, report expenditures back to donors and foundations, track volunteer reimbursements, and comply with IRS Form 990 requirements. Many nonprofits juggle multiple grants simultaneously, each with its own specific rules regarding spending and reporting.

Older nonprofit software platforms, such as Blackbaud, Sage, and MIP, continue to dominate the market, but they often fall short in providing real-time spending controls, intuitive approval processes, and seamless integrations with the tools nonprofits currently use.

Rather than attempting to replace these existing systems, Givefront positions itself as a specialized layer that complements them. The platform integrates with existing accounting software and adds essential features that nonprofits require, including grant-level budgeting, audit-ready receipt capture, nonprofit-specific spend controls, and automated reporting.

“Many of the workflows we’re building are deeply specific to how this part of the economy works,” Tengtrakool noted. “Our workflows and integrations are a 10x improvement when compared to traditional corporate or spend management tools.”

Currently, Givefront generates revenue through card interchange fees and subscription charges associated with its bill pay service. Looking ahead, the startup plans to diversify its revenue streams by introducing related products such as payroll, banking, budgeting tools, and potentially investment or endowment management services.

Since launching its card services about six months ago, Givefront has onboarded hundreds of nonprofits onto its platform. The company reports that both its revenue and total payment volume are growing at more than 200% month over month. By the end of this year, Givefront anticipates collaborating with around 1,000 nonprofits, with a goal of expanding that number to approximately 5,000 organizations by mid-next year.

Recently, Givefront secured $2 million in a funding round led by Script Capital, with contributions from Y Combinator, C3 Ventures, and Phoenix Fund, as well as angel investors, including the CEOs of Chariot and Wealthfront. The new capital will be utilized to enhance distribution, expand the team, and further develop its card and bill pay offerings.

As Givefront continues to grow, it aims to redefine financial management for nonprofits, providing them with the modern tools they need to thrive in an increasingly complex economic landscape, according to The American Bazaar.

Detransitioner Chloe Cole Discusses Complications Following Gender Procedures

Chloe Cole, a detransitioner, advocates against gender transition procedures for minors, sharing her personal experiences and complications from medical interventions during a recent event with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Chloe Cole, a 21-year-old detransitioner, joined U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Thursday to advocate for the cessation of gender transition procedures for minors, drawing from her own experiences.

During the announcement, which outlined proposed regulatory actions aimed at ending “sex-rejecting procedures” on minors, Cole expressed her concerns about the medical interventions she underwent between the ages of 12 and 16. These procedures included puberty blockers, testosterone injections, and a double mastectomy, all of which she claims have had irreversible effects on her health.

The proposed actions by HHS are part of an executive order issued by President Donald Trump in January, which called for measures to protect children from what he termed “chemical and surgical mutilation.” According to an HHS official, the new policies could lead to the defunding of hospitals that provide gender transition procedures.

Reflecting on her journey, Cole stated, “As soon as gender was in the picture, none of my doctors or psychologists asked the real questions that they should have. The entire focus was on my feelings and what I wanted rather than what I really needed in that moment.” She emphasized that what she truly needed was affirmation and love for her identity as a “young and yet tomboyish little girl.”

Cole criticized her medical providers for failing to adequately inform her about the risks associated with the treatments, focusing instead on the perceived benefits of halting female puberty and promoting male secondary sexual characteristics through testosterone. “There was nothing they could say to me that would make me understand the gravity of what I was about to go through, because I was still growing up,” she explained. “I had very little experience in the world, and I simply would not be mature enough to be equipped to undergo such a life-changing procedure in every way.”

She noted that her parents never believed she was transgender but felt pressured by the medical community. “At the time when we started going through this as a family, there really were no resources that would speak to the reality of transgenderism, especially for children,” Cole said. “Most people were not aware then that this was something that was even happening in our hospital systems.”

Cole recounted that her parents were warned that if they did not allow her to transition, she would likely face severe mental health consequences, including suicide. “My legal guardians were forced to make this decision under duress,” she stated. “But even if my parents had supported transitioning medically from the start, no parent or any adult ultimately has a right to determine whether a child gets to be chemically sterilized or mutilated.”

Since undergoing these procedures, Cole has experienced numerous complications that continue to affect her quality of life. She revealed that her fertility status remains uncertain and that she will not be able to breastfeed due to her surgical removal of breast tissue. “As an adult, I am now grieving,” she shared. “On top of that, the areolar skin grafts they used in my surgery began to fail two years afterward. I must wear bandages on my chest every day.”

In 2023, Cole filed a lawsuit with the Center for American Liberty (CAL) against the hospitals involved in her care, alleging that they pushed her into what she describes as medical mutilation. Mark Trammell of CAL commented on the HHS announcement, stating that it represents a critical acknowledgment that experimental medical interventions on children experiencing gender distress have failed to meet basic safety and effectiveness standards. “It signals that medicine must return to its core ethical obligation: First, do no harm,” Trammell added. “We will continue fighting to ensure accountability for the institutions that promoted these practices and to secure justice for the children and detransitioners whose lives were forever altered.”

Dr. Marc Siegel, a senior medical analyst for Fox News, expressed support for a more conservative approach to treating minors with gender dysphoria. He highlighted potential long-term effects of puberty blockers, including bone loss and fertility issues, advocating for the treatment of underlying mental health concerns before considering irreversible medical interventions. “The welfare of the child must come first,” Siegel stated, emphasizing the need for a cautious and supportive approach.

Cole concluded her remarks by urging children who are questioning their gender identity to take their time. “While there are only two sexes, there are a million different ways that you can be yourself,” she said. “God is there for you. He is the one who has created you this way, and you can seek his counsel. You can continue praying, and I think ultimately it’s connecting with your family, building your purpose in this world, and looking to the gospel and up to God.”

For further insights on this topic, Fox News Digital’s Emma Colton contributed to this report.

Meher Castelino, India’s First Miss India and Fashion Journalist, Dies at 81

Meher Castelino, India’s first Miss India and a pioneering figure in fashion journalism, passed away at 81, leaving behind a legacy that transformed the industry and inspired countless individuals.

Meher Castelino, renowned as India’s first-ever Miss India and a significant voice in the realm of fashion journalism, passed away on Wednesday at the age of 81. Her death marks the conclusion of an era that intertwined beauty, intellect, and industry insight.

Castelino is survived by her son Karl, daughter-in-law Nisha, and daughter Christina. Her passing has elicited heartfelt tributes from designers, editors, students, and industry leaders who credit her with reshaping the understanding, documentation, and respect for fashion in India.

Born and raised in Mumbai, Castelino first gained national recognition in 1964 when she won the Femina Miss India title, becoming the first woman to don the crown. At a time when beauty pageants were still emerging in India, she represented the country in international competitions, including Miss Universe and Miss United Nations, showcasing Indian womanhood on a global platform.

Despite her achievements in pageantry, those who knew her assert that she never allowed the glamour of the crown to define her. “Winning Miss India opened doors, but Meher chose to walk through them with purpose,” recalled a senior fashion editor who collaborated with her for decades. “She wanted to build something lasting, not just be remembered for a title.”

In 1973, Castelino made a pivotal shift towards writing, publishing her first article in Eve’s Weekly. What began as a single byline blossomed into a formidable career spanning over five decades. She became a full-time fashion journalist and syndicated columnist, with her work featured in nearly 130 national and international newspapers and magazines.

At a time when fashion writing in India was primarily focused on trends and celebrity wardrobes, Castelino approached the subject as a serious industry. She wrote extensively about textiles, craftsmanship, branding, consumer psychology, and the economics of style—long before these discussions became mainstream.

<p“She was talking about fashion as business when most people were still dismissing it as frivolous,” noted a leading Indian designer. “Meher gave the industry intellectual legitimacy.”

Widely regarded as a pioneer in Indian fashion journalism, Castelino infused her writing with analytical rigor and historical depth. Her columns served as a living archive of India’s evolution—from small boutiques and export houses to global fashion weeks and international runways.

She authored several influential books, including *Manstyle*, *Fashion Kaleidoscope*, and *Fashion Musings*, which explored changing trends, evolving gender norms in fashion, and the cultural forces shaping style in India. These works continue to be reference points for students and professionals alike.

Castelino also held the position of official fashion writer for Lakme Fashion Week and other major fashion events in India, documenting not only collections but the broader ecosystem surrounding them. Her reviews were celebrated for their clarity, fairness, and deep contextual understanding.

“She never sensationalized fashion,” remarked a former Lakme Fashion Week organizer. “Her writing respected designers, readers, and the craft itself.”

Beyond her contributions to journalism, Castelino played a vital role in mentoring the next generation of fashion professionals. She frequently served as a judge at fashion awards, was a sought-after speaker at fashion institutes, and guided young designers and aspiring journalists.

Students remember her for her uncompromising standards and extensive knowledge. “If you exaggerated a fact or misunderstood a reference, she would gently but firmly correct you,” shared a former fashion student. “She believed fashion deserved the same integrity as any other field of journalism.”

Her remarkable ability to recall decades of collections, designers, and industry milestones earned her a reputation as one of Indian fashion’s most reliable chroniclers.

While history will always remember Meher Castelino as India’s first Miss India, those who knew her assert that her true legacy lies elsewhere. “She proved that beauty and intellect are not opposites,” stated a fellow journalist. “She redefined what it meant to move beyond a pageant crown.”

With her passing, Indian fashion media has lost not just a pioneer, but a conscience—someone who insisted on depth in an industry often tempted by surface appeal. Her career serves as a reminder that fashion, when thoughtfully examined, reflects society itself.

As India’s fashion industry continues to gain global recognition, Meher Castelino’s voice will endure in the words she wrote, the minds she shaped, and the standards she set, according to Global Net News.

The Most Read Stories of 2023: A Review of Indian-American Perspectives

The most engaging stories of 2025 explored themes of immigration, cultural heritage, and the significance of personal connections, resonating deeply with readers of India Currents.

What compels you to click on a story? Is it the personal stakes involved, the latest political updates, or insightful cultural commentary? In 2025, India Currents published hundreds of articles, but five in particular captured the attention of our readers.

One of the standout stories addressed the newly proposed 3.5% tax on remittances sent abroad by foreign workers, including green card holders and temporary H1B visa holders. This article topped our charts, highlighting a little-noticed provision buried within the expansive “One Big Beautiful” bill. Experts warned that this tax could have significant economic and social repercussions for the Indian diaspora, particularly as India is the world’s leading recipient of remittances. At an American Community Media (ACoM) briefing titled “Taxing Remittances—A New Front in War on Immigrants,” specialists cautioned that such a tax would adversely affect economies in lower-income countries, where remittances can account for up to 30% of GDP.

Another impactful piece examined a memo issued by the U.S. Department of Justice on June 11, which sent shockwaves through immigrant communities across the nation. The memo declared denaturalization—the revocation of U.S. citizenship from naturalized citizens—a “top-five priority.” This policy is not merely a legal technicality; it poses a significant threat to many, as noted by ACoM.

In a rare piece of positive news, readers responded enthusiastically to a story about the Trump administration’s retreat from a controversial plan. In April, the Social Security Administration decided against withholding 100% of monthly payments from many beneficiaries in an effort to recover funds that the government had allegedly overpaid.

In a different vein, Mukund Acharya’s reflection on the declining art of handwriting resonated with many readers. In an era dominated by fast-paced digital communication and artificial intelligence, Acharya’s piece served as a reminder of the value of slowing down and savoring the moment. Scientific studies support his claims, indicating that the physical act of writing engages multiple regions of the brain and offers therapeutic benefits, such as reducing stress and anxiety. Handwriting can also enhance self-awareness and provide a sense of accomplishment.

Additionally, Deepanwita Gita Niyogi’s exploration of Shimla transported readers to a world of literary nostalgia. Her journey traced the echoes of Rudyard Kipling’s “The Phantom Rickshaw” amidst the rain-washed colonial bridges and vintage cafes of the city. Niyogi’s narrative captured the essence of a place where history and modernity coexist, enriching the reader’s experience.

The stories that resonated most with our audience this year reveal a common thread: themes of belonging, the importance of preserving what matters—be it citizenship, health, or heritage—and the resilience required to navigate an uncertain world.

As we wrap up this year, we are reminded that India Currents occupies a unique space at the intersection of personal and political concerns, blending the urgent with the contemplative, and bridging American and Indian narratives.

Looking ahead to 2026, we are excited about the stories yet to be told and the questions still to be explored.

What should we be paying attention to in the coming year? If you have a compelling story, a pressing issue, or a topic that you feel deserves more coverage, we invite you to reach out to us at prachi@indiacurrents.com. The most important stories of next year could very well begin with you.

According to India Currents.

US Affirms India’s Role as Key Partner Despite Pax Silica Absence

The United States reaffirmed India’s importance as a strategic partner in supply chain security and advanced technologies, despite India’s absence from the inaugural Pax Silica Summit.

WASHINGTON, DC – The United States has emphasized that India continues to be a vital strategic partner in the areas of supply chain security and advanced technologies, even though New Delhi did not participate in the inaugural Pax Silica Summit. This new U.S.-led initiative aims to secure the global silicon and semiconductor supply chain.

During a recent news conference organized by the Foreign Press Centre, Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs Jacob Helberg addressed speculation surrounding India’s absence from the summit. He stated that the conjecture linking India’s non-participation to political tensions with Washington was misplaced and incorrect.

Helberg clarified, “My understanding is that there was a lot of speculation behind India not participating in the Pax Silica Summit. I want to be clear that the conversations between the United States and India pertaining to trade arrangements are a completely separate and parallel track to our discussions on supply chain security. We are not conflating those two things.”

He further highlighted that the U.S. views India as a highly strategic potential partner in efforts related to supply chain security and expressed a desire to engage with India on these matters.

The Pax Silica initiative, launched last week, includes an initial group of countries that are closely linked to semiconductor manufacturing and advanced technology supply chains. This group comprises Singapore, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the United Kingdom. The framework aims to reduce vulnerabilities in global supply chains that support various industries, including smartphones, automobiles, and artificial intelligence.

On the subject of India, Helberg underscored that engagement with New Delhi is ongoing and active. He noted that he is in nearly daily communication with officials in Delhi and mentioned that Washington is actively exploring ways to deepen collaboration swiftly.

Helberg also pointed to an upcoming opportunity for high-level engagement, revealing that he will attend the ‘India AI Impact Summit’ in February. He indicated that the U.S. plans to significantly enhance bilateral collaboration with India on economic security issues and suggested that Indian participation in future Pax Silica-related efforts remains a distinct possibility.

Earlier in the briefing, Helberg explained that the initial group of Pax Silica countries was intentionally limited to those forming the core of semiconductor manufacturing, such as Singapore, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and the Netherlands, before potentially expanding to include areas like critical minerals.

This ongoing dialogue reflects the United States’ commitment to strengthening its partnership with India, particularly in the context of global supply chain security and technological advancements, as both nations navigate the complexities of international trade and economic cooperation.

According to IANS, the U.S. remains optimistic about India’s future involvement in initiatives like Pax Silica, reinforcing the notion that collaboration between the two countries is both necessary and beneficial.

NC Senate Race Intensifies as Trump Supports Whatley for GOP Seat

President Donald Trump is campaigning in North Carolina to support Michael Whatley’s Senate bid, as the GOP aims to retain a crucial seat in the 2026 midterm elections.

President Donald Trump is making a significant campaign stop in North Carolina this Friday, focusing on the imperative of retaining an open Senate seat previously held by a Republican. The event is part of the GOP’s strategy to maintain control in the upcoming 2026 midterm elections.

Trump will join forces with Michael Whatley, a former chair of the Republican National Committee (RNC) and the leading candidate for the GOP Senate nomination to succeed retiring Republican Senator Thom Tillis. Whatley is expected to face off against former two-term Democratic Governor Roy Cooper in what is anticipated to be one of the most competitive and costly Senate races in the nation, as the GOP seeks to uphold its 53-47 majority in the Senate.

Affordability is set to be a central theme in the campaign, with rising prices being a significant concern for voters. “President Trump won North Carolina all three times—2016, 2020, and 2024—because he connects directly with the people of North Carolina, talking about the issues that they care about. So it is very important to have him on the ground,” Whatley stated in a recent interview with Fox News Digital.

One of the challenges for Republicans heading into the midterms is mobilizing low-propensity MAGA voters and other Trump supporters, who may not turn out in elections where the former president is not on the ballot. Whatley, who was encouraged by Trump to run for the Senate, hopes to see the president return to North Carolina multiple times during the campaign.

<p”He is fantastically popular in North Carolina,” Whatley remarked about Trump. “He has a real affinity for the state. The voters love him, and it’ll be very, very good to get him back in North Carolina.” Whatley and other Republicans are framing the 2026 elections as a referendum on Trump and his policies.

<p”We’re certainly going to need him to be on the ballot,” Whatley emphasized. “When you think about what happens if we lose the House, if we lose the Senate, if the Democrats take over, they will revert to investigations and hoaxes and impeachments. That is really, truly the president and his legacy on the ballot.”

With inflation remaining a persistent issue, Democrats have been focusing on affordability, which contributed to their successes in recent elections. Whatley acknowledged that while the economy has been a challenge, he believes there are signs of improvement. “We’re seeing signs already that the economy is starting to tick up and is starting to take hold as the President’s policies are getting in place,” he said. “We need to ensure that we have the trade policies, the tax policies, and the regulatory policies from this administration that will benefit our small businesses, manufacturers, and farmers across North Carolina.”

However, Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin has a different perspective, asserting that Trump and the Republicans are headed for electoral defeat. “Donald Trump has lost the economy, is losing his mind, and is going to lose the midterms,” Martin stated ahead of Trump’s event in North Carolina.

Whatley has been actively campaigning across North Carolina, emphasizing his commitment to engaging with every community. “We will be in all 100 counties across North Carolina, and we’re fighting for every single family,” he said. He also expressed confidence in his connection to Trump, stating, “Our voters know Donald Trump, and they know me. I’ve worked on his campaigns since 2016. President Trump won North Carolina in all three election cycles. So we know how to win, and we have the policies that are going to win.”

In his criticism of Cooper, Whatley argued that the former governor has consistently sided with unpopular positions. “Roy Cooper is on the wrong side of every 80-20 issue. He has fought harder for criminals, for illegal aliens, and for those who want to compete in women’s sports and use women’s locker rooms. Those are issues he will have to defend,” Whatley charged.

In response, Cooper’s campaign countered by stating that the former governor has dedicated his career to advocating for North Carolina families, focusing on lowering healthcare costs and enhancing community safety. They criticized Whatley for his long-standing ties to Washington politicians, claiming he has prioritized the interests of billionaires and special interests over the middle class.

As the 2026 midterm elections approach, the stakes are high for both parties in North Carolina, with the outcome likely to have significant implications for the balance of power in the Senate.

According to Fox News, the race is shaping up to be a pivotal battleground in the national political landscape.

Zelenskyy Urges U.S. Action Amid Russian War Preparations for 2026

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy urges the U.S. and allies to respond to indications that Russia is preparing for intensified conflict in the coming year.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has called on the United States and its allies to take action in response to “signals” from Russia suggesting that the country is gearing up to escalate military operations in the upcoming year.

In a statement on Wednesday, Zelenskyy highlighted the importance of recognizing these signals, stating, “Today, we again heard signals from Moscow that they are preparing to make next year a year of war. These signals are not only for us. It is crucial that our partners see them, and not only see them but also respond — especially partners in the United States, who often say that Russia wants to end the war.”

His remarks came amid ongoing discussions about the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, with the White House noting that significant progress has been made in diplomatic efforts to resolve the situation. A White House official remarked, “Over the past few weeks, the President’s team has made tremendous progress with respect to ending the war between Russia and Ukraine, and as the President stated, he believes we are closer now than we have ever been.”

However, Zelenskyy expressed concern that the current rhetoric from Russia contradicts these diplomatic efforts. He pointed out that the signals emanating from Moscow include official military orders, which he believes indicate a mindset focused on aggression rather than negotiation. “This Russian mindset must be recognized — and acted upon,” he asserted. “When Russia is in this mindset, it will also undermine diplomacy — seeking, through diplomatic language and pressure over specific points in documents — to merely mask its desire to destroy Ukraine and Ukrainians, and the desire to legitimize Russia’s theft of our land.”

Zelenskyy emphasized the need for comprehensive protection against what he described as Russia’s “case history of madness.” He called for a multifaceted approach that includes security measures, financial actions regarding Russian assets, and political initiatives. “Real protection is needed against this Russian case history of madness, and we will continue working with all partners to ensure that protection is in place,” he stated. “The courage of all partners is required: to see the truth, acknowledge the truth, and act accordingly. I want to thank everyone who supports Ukraine.”

In addition to his written statement, Zelenskyy conveyed his message in a video addressed to the Ukrainian public.

Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin made comments during a Defense Ministry board meeting on Wednesday, asserting that Russia would achieve its objectives, whether through diplomacy or military action. “The goals of the special military operation will undoubtedly be achieved,” Putin said, according to a Kremlin transcript. “We would prefer to accomplish this and address the root causes of the conflict through diplomatic means. However, if the opposing side and its foreign patrons refuse to engage in substantive dialogue, Russia will achieve the liberation of its historical lands by military means.”

In the U.S., some lawmakers are echoing Zelenskyy’s calls for increased support for Ukraine. Representative Don Bacon, a Republican from Nebraska and a strong advocate for U.S. assistance to Ukraine, stated in a post on social media, “Again… the U.S. should send 200 long-range and extremely accurate cruise missiles to Ukraine. Maybe then, Putin will get serious and seek peace. Putin started this war, and he’ll stop this war once he realizes he cannot win and that the cost of war is too high.”

The ongoing conflict has prompted various efforts from the U.S. government to broker peace between Russia and Ukraine, with officials emphasizing the importance of a lasting resolution.

As the situation continues to evolve, the international community remains watchful of developments and the potential implications for regional stability.

According to Fox News, Zelenskyy’s urgent appeal underscores the critical need for a unified response to the threats posed by Russia.

Republican Healthcare Bill Advances in House of Representatives

The House of Representatives advanced a Republican healthcare bill that aims to lower premiums for some while raising costs for others, amidst ongoing debates over healthcare policy in the U.S.

The House of Representatives took a significant step on Wednesday by advancing a Republican healthcare bill that does not include a renewal of the tax credit. This legislation, which is set to take effect in January 2027, proposes to lower premiums for certain individuals while simultaneously reducing subsidies and increasing costs for others.

One of the key features of the proposed bill is the expansion of access to association health plans. This change would enable small businesses, freelancers, and self-employed individuals to pool their resources, allowing them to purchase group insurance at potentially lower rates.

The bill passed with a narrow margin of 216-211, marking what is likely to be Congress’s final vote on healthcare policy for the year. This vote came after Republican leaders faced internal dissent as some members supported a Democratic-backed initiative aimed at extending benefits under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

In a related procedural vote earlier in the day, the House voted 204-203 to thwart a last-minute attempt by Democrats, with support from four Republicans, to push for quick votes on a three-year extension of ACA subsidies. Republican Representative Kevin Kiley of California expressed concern, stating, “The bill does not address the immediate, urgent problem in front of us, which is that 22 million people are about to pay a lot more for health insurance.”

Despite the Republican-controlled House passing the healthcare bill, it is unlikely to be considered by the Senate before Congress enters a year-end recess. This break will halt legislative action until January 5, 2026, leaving millions of Americans facing significantly higher health insurance premiums, which may lead some to forgo coverage altogether.

The recent developments in healthcare policy underscore the ongoing struggle to balance affordability, coverage, and fiscal responsibility in the United States. Legislative efforts that aim to reconcile lower premiums with reduced subsidies illustrate the complex trade-offs inherent in major policy changes. Even minor adjustments can have widespread implications, impacting not only individual households but also the broader insurance market and public confidence in federal programs.

Political divisions and procedural hurdles further highlight the challenges of enacting healthcare reform. Disagreements between parties, cross-party negotiations, and timing considerations often dictate which proposals succeed and which falter. This dynamic illustrates that the outcomes of policy initiatives are shaped as much by legislative strategy as by the substance of the bills themselves.

Beyond immediate concerns regarding costs and coverage, these developments emphasize the necessity for long-term planning in health policy. The uncertainty surrounding legislative outcomes, potential delays, and future adjustments means that families, small businesses, and insurers must remain vigilant and adaptable to changing conditions.

As the debate continues, the implications of this healthcare bill will resonate throughout the American healthcare landscape, potentially affecting millions of lives in the years to come. The ongoing discussions reflect a broader conversation about how best to ensure access to affordable healthcare while managing the fiscal responsibilities of the government.

According to The American Bazaar, the passage of this bill marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing evolution of U.S. healthcare policy.

Key Takeaways from President Trump’s Address at the White House

President Trump’s recent White House address highlighted his administration’s economic achievements while addressing public dissatisfaction and declining approval ratings.

In an 18-minute address delivered from the White House, President Donald Trump focused on a range of topics, emphasizing the U.S. economy and his administration’s accomplishments. The speech aimed to counteract public dissatisfaction and declining approval ratings as he prepares for the upcoming midterm elections in 2026.

During the address, Trump discussed various issues, including wages, employment, military strength, and illegal immigration. He also sought to draw comparisons between his administration’s efforts and those of former President Joe Biden.

Trump placed blame on Democrats, particularly Biden, for ongoing economic challenges such as inflation and high living costs. He argued that his policies have laid the foundation for stronger economic growth moving forward.

A notable highlight of the speech was the announcement of a one-time “warrior dividend” bonus of $1,776 for over 1.4 million U.S. military service members. This symbolic gesture, referencing the year of the nation’s founding, was framed as a Christmas gift and is reportedly funded in part by tariff revenue.

Several key claims made during the speech warrant closer examination:

Regarding economic conditions, Trump asserted that wages are increasing at a rate much faster than inflation. While fact-checkers confirm that wages are indeed outpacing inflation, the difference is not as significant as he suggested, with wage growth at 3.5% compared to inflation at 3.0%.

On investment, Trump claimed to have secured $18 trillion in investments. However, the reality is closer to $7 to $9.6 trillion, which includes vague pledges and deals that have not yet been finalized.

In terms of job creation, Trump stated that all net job growth during his presidency has benefited American-born citizens. This claim is misleading, as foreign-born workers have also experienced improvements in unemployment rates.

Trump made several assertions about the cost of living that merit scrutiny. He exaggerated the price drops for eggs and Thanksgiving turkeys, stating that egg prices fell by 43.9%, while the actual figure is closer to 43.9%, not the claimed 82%. Turkey prices reportedly fell by 3.7%, not the 33% he suggested.

When discussing gasoline prices, Trump claimed they were averaging between $1.99 and $2.50 nationally. In reality, current averages are higher, falling between $2.89 and $2.90.

On prescription drug costs, Trump claimed that prices would drop by 400% to 600%. While some agreements exist that could lead to reductions—such as a 50% to 85% decrease on certain drugs and a 40% cut for GLP-1 drugs—many of these deals are contingent, confidential, or not fully implemented.

In terms of immigration, Trump claimed that the country faced an invasion of 25 million individuals from prisons and asylums. This assertion is false, as undocumented entries during Biden’s administration are estimated to be between 7.4 million and 10.2 million.

While some of Trump’s claims are accurate or directionally correct—such as wages outpacing inflation and falling gas prices—many appear exaggerated, particularly regarding immigration, investment totals, and cost reductions. Several promises, especially those related to drug pricing and investment, depend on future implementation.

In addition to economic issues, Trump addressed immigration, crime, and upcoming housing initiatives, hinting at plans to nominate a new Federal Reserve chair who would support lower interest rates. Despite his optimistic tone, analysts noted that the address contained few significant new policy announcements and echoed familiar talking points.

The speech comes at a time of growing frustration over rising costs, job market concerns, and public sentiment regarding economic conditions. As Trump seeks to regain momentum ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, the effectiveness of his address remains to be seen.

According to The American Bazaar, the address reflects Trump’s ongoing efforts to connect with voters and address their concerns as he navigates a challenging political landscape.

New Study Finds Evidence of Leprosy in the Americas Before European Arrival

New research indicates that leprosy existed in the Americas long before European explorers arrived, challenging previous historical assumptions about the disease’s origins.

Recent findings from scientists at the Institut Pasteur in Paris, in collaboration with a U.S. university, have revealed that a second species of bacteria responsible for leprosy, known as Mycobacterium lepromatosis, was present in the Americas well before the arrival of European explorers. This discovery significantly alters the historical narrative surrounding the disease, which was previously thought to have been introduced by European settlers.

Historically, it was believed that the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae was the sole cause of leprosy, or Hansen’s disease, in the Americas, and that it was spread by early European explorers and settlers. However, the identification of Mycobacterium lepromatosis suggests that an existing strain of the bacteria was already endemic to the continent, challenging the long-held belief that Europeans were responsible for its introduction.

According to researchers, Mycobacterium lepromatosis existed and infected humans for at least 1,000 years prior to European contact. Dr. Maria Lopopolo, the first author of the study and a researcher at the Laboratory of Microbial Paleogenomics at the Institut Pasteur, emphasized the significance of this finding. “This discovery transforms our understanding of the history of leprosy in America. It shows that a form of the disease was already endemic among Indigenous populations well before the Europeans arrived,” she stated.

The study, which involved collaboration with the French National Center for Scientific Research and the University of Colorado, was initiated after Mycobacterium lepromatosis was first identified in a Mexican patient in 2008 and later in red squirrels in the British Isles in 2016. Utilizing advanced genetic techniques, researchers reconstructed the genomes of Mycobacterium lepromatosis from ancient individuals in Argentina and Canada. The genetic analysis revealed that the two strains from these regions were closely related, indicating that the bacteria spread rapidly across the continent.

The results confirmed that Mycobacterium lepromatosis had already disseminated throughout North and South America prior to European exploration. The research team worked closely with Indigenous communities, various international institutions, and archaeologists, analyzing over 800 DNA samples from ancient human remains and recent medical cases exhibiting signs of leprosy.

Nicolás Rascovan, the lead author of the study at the Institut Pasteur, remarked on the implications of their findings, stating, “We are just beginning to uncover the diversity and global movements of this recently identified pathogen. This study allows us to hypothesize that there might be unknown animal reservoirs.” This suggests that the understanding of leprosy’s transmission and its historical context may be more complex than previously thought.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notes that leprosy can affect the nerves, skin, and eyes of those infected, but it is treatable with antibiotics. Currently, there are approximately 225 reported cases in the U.S. and around 250,000 cases worldwide, according to the CDC.

This groundbreaking research not only sheds light on the historical presence of leprosy in the Americas but also opens up new avenues for understanding the disease’s transmission and its impact on Indigenous populations. As scientists continue to explore the genetic diversity of Mycobacterium lepromatosis, the implications for public health and historical narratives surrounding infectious diseases may evolve further.

These findings underscore the importance of ongoing research in microbial paleogenomics and the need to reconsider historical assumptions about disease spread and its effects on populations. The study serves as a reminder of the complex interplay between human history and infectious diseases, highlighting the necessity for continued investigation into the origins and evolution of pathogens.

According to Fox News, the implications of this research are profound, prompting a reevaluation of the historical context of leprosy in the Americas.

Foreign Digital Influencers and Their Impact on India’s Global Image

Foreign digital influencers are reshaping India’s global image, often through sensationalized portrayals that can distort perceptions and impact tourism and investment.

India’s international reputation is increasingly influenced by a new class of global narrators: foreign digital influencers. Unlike traditional diplomats or foreign correspondents, these creators leverage platforms such as YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok to reach millions of viewers within hours. Their content often garners more attention than conventional international news media.

A noticeable trend has emerged in this digital landscape. Many foreign influencers produce high-visibility content about India that is framed through sensationalism and visual exaggeration. Common themes include depictions of dirty streets, chaotic markets, and dramatic narratives of survival, often accompanied by exaggerated reactions of fear or disgust. While these portrayals are not entirely fabricated, they rely on selective exaggeration, amplified by algorithms that prioritize emotional intensity over contextual accuracy.

This phenomenon leads to a subtle yet persistent form of reputational degradation for India. It is not merely a case of propaganda or hate speech; rather, it can be described as a form of “soft hate.” This algorithmically incentivized negativity contributes to a distorted global perception of India, posing a strategic vulnerability in today’s information environment.

Most foreign creators do not intend to malign India. Their primary motivation is to generate engagement-driven revenue. Platform algorithms reward content that elicits high-arousal emotions—such as disgust, fear, and outrage—because these emotions maximize watch time, comments, and shares.

Three structural mechanisms drive this trend:

First, selective framing leads creators to disproportionately film scenes of open drains, waste sites, overcrowded slums, and stray animals while systematically avoiding modern infrastructure, clean residential areas, and tourist attractions. This narrow visual stereotype presents India as a chaotic society rather than a complex one.

Second, negative scenes are aesthetically intensified through dramatic music, shaky handheld footage, and alarmist thumbnails. Ordinary urban density is transformed into a survival spectacle, further enhancing the sensationalism.

Third, algorithmic reward loops perpetuate this cycle. When a negative video performs well, the algorithm boosts it, leading to increased subscribers and revenue for the creator. This success encourages the creator to replicate the same formula, while other creators follow suit, resulting in a self-reinforcing industry of negative content about India. This dynamic is driven by commercial incentives rather than ideological motives, making it difficult for conventional media regulation or public diplomacy tools to address the issue.

The long-term consequences for India are significant. Foreign audiences unfamiliar with the country increasingly encounter it through sensational portrayals, such as “filthiest streets” videos and “dangerous India” narratives. Over time, these images solidify into default mental models, creating a perceived truth that oversimplifies the nation’s complexities.

This distorted perception can also impact tourism. Potential visitors often use platforms like YouTube for travel planning, and sensationalized content can heighten perceived personal risk and reduce confidence in hygiene and safety. As a result, tourism may become concentrated in “safe zones,” harming local economies in other areas. Even tourists who do visit may arrive with heightened fear and cultural suspicion.

Furthermore, India’s national image indirectly affects foreign investment confidence, academic exchanges, student mobility, and cultural diplomacy outcomes. A reputation for chaos and risk—however exaggerated—raises the background cost of engagement with India.

The narratives that circulate globally about India are increasingly produced by external, monetized individuals who have no stake in the country’s long-term reputation and are not accountable to Indian institutions. This represents a loss of narrative sovereignty in the digital age.

Traditional public diplomacy efforts in India are primarily designed for state-to-state communication, cultural festivals, and institutional messaging. However, platform-driven reputation warfare operates through informal individuals and entertainment formats, often bypassing the structured approaches of conventional diplomacy.

The challenges are compounded by significant policy gaps. There is currently no institutional monitoring of influencer-driven reputational risks, no strategic engagement framework for foreign digital creators, and no counter-algorithmic visibility strategy. This leaves India structurally exposed in the global attention economy.

To address these challenges, India could implement several concrete policy responses. Establishing a National Digital Reputation Observatory could involve creating a permanent inter-ministerial unit that includes the Ministry of External Affairs, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, the Tourism Ministry, and cyber policy experts. This unit would track viral foreign content about India, detect emerging narrative risks, and flag severe distortions early on.

India should also engage creators strategically rather than adversarially. By inviting high-reach foreign creators through structured media fellowships and facilitating guided access to lesser-known regions, India can foster proactive narrative engagement. Influencers shape perception regardless of state involvement, making strategic cooperation a safer approach than neglect.

Additionally, building a global “positive visibility pipeline” is essential. While India already invests in tourism promotion and cultural diplomacy, the content produced is often weakly optimized for digital platforms. Investing in high-production short-form video aesthetics and emotionally engaging narratives can enhance India’s visibility and counteract negative portrayals.

Developing a rapid reputational response protocol is also crucial. When a heavily distorted viral video appears, India should issue quiet clarifications rather than public confrontations, provide corrected footage and context to secondary outlets, and activate diaspora creator networks. Silence allows distortions to consolidate.

Finally, integrating platform governance into foreign policy is vital. India’s digital diplomacy must treat algorithms as political infrastructures, advocating for algorithmic accountability in bilateral tech negotiations and supporting global governance norms on cross-border digital representation.

As India navigates this new landscape, it must recognize that its reputation is increasingly shaped by platform-mediated visibility rather than national behavior. This shift creates a new category of vulnerability, where reputational harm accumulates through ordinary monetized content without the need for hostile actors or disinformation campaigns.

In conclusion, India can no longer afford to view foreign influencer content as harmless entertainment. In the contemporary attention economy, such content serves as a form of distributed strategic communication with real economic and diplomatic consequences. Transitioning from conventional soft-power thinking to visibility governance will be essential for managing how India appears and is interpreted across global platforms. Failure to adapt will leave India’s global image increasingly shaped by commercial incentives beyond its control, according to South Asia Monitor.

Quad Conducts First Field Exercise for Disaster Response in Indo-Pacific

Quad nations Australia, India, Japan, and the United States have successfully conducted their inaugural Field Training Exercise to enhance disaster response capabilities across the Indo-Pacific region.

WASHINGTON, DC – The Quad nations, consisting of Australia, India, Japan, and the United States, have completed their first-ever Field Training Exercise aimed at bolstering a shared logistics network for rapid civilian disaster response across the Indo-Pacific region. This milestone was officially announced on December 16.

The exercise took place from December 8 to 12 at Andersen Air Force Base in Guam, coinciding with Operation Christmas Drop. It marked an operational achievement for the Quad Indo-Pacific Logistics Network (IPLN), as stated by the U.S. Department of State.

The IPLN is designed to enable participating countries to utilize shared logistics capabilities to support civilian responses to large-scale natural disasters more swiftly and efficiently throughout the Indo-Pacific. The initiative aims to save lives, accelerate recovery efforts, and provide timely assistance to regional partners facing emergencies.

During the training, participants engaged in practical, hands-on activities that tested coordination and interoperability among the four nations. A significant component of the exercise included boarding a Japan Air Self-Defense Force C-130H transport aircraft, highlighting the focus on airlift coordination and logistics integration.

The exercise emphasized aligning capabilities and procedures among the partners, a crucial step in enhancing collective responses during humanitarian crises. Interoperability and coordination were identified as core priorities, reflecting the Quad’s broader objective of supporting regional partners during critical moments.

Observers note that the emphasis on disaster response illustrates a growing awareness among Indo-Pacific countries regarding the increasing scale and frequency of natural disasters in the region, which can include cyclones, earthquakes, floods, and volcanic eruptions. By pooling logistics capabilities, the Quad aims to reduce response times and improve coordination when civilian populations urgently need assistance.

India, in particular, has positioned itself as a first responder in the Indian Ocean region, increasingly prioritizing humanitarian assistance and disaster relief as a vital aspect of its regional engagement. The IPLN framework aligns with New Delhi’s broader efforts to enhance collaboration with like-minded partners in addressing non-traditional security challenges.

According to IANS, this exercise marks a significant step forward in the Quad’s commitment to improving disaster response capabilities in the Indo-Pacific region.

GOP Highlights Democratic Division as Progressives Enter 2026 Senate Races

Progressive Democrats are entering competitive Senate primaries amid significant party divisions, with Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s Texas campaign highlighting ideological rifts that could impact the 2026 elections.

As the Democratic Party grapples with internal divisions following disappointing election results in 2024, progressive candidates are stepping into the fray for the highly competitive Senate primaries of 2026. Among them is Rep. Jasmine Crockett from Texas, whose campaign is drawing attention to the ideological splits within the party.

Republicans are seizing on Crockett’s entry into the race, viewing it as evidence that Democrats are shifting too far left to appeal to voters in red and purple states. National Republican Senatorial Committee Chair Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina remarked, “The Democratic Party, they’re in shambles everywhere around the country — and no place more obvious than Texas. Jasmine getting in this race is great news.”

Despite being dismissed by former President Donald Trump as “low IQ,” Crockett has cultivated a substantial following on social media, which may give her the visibility needed to influence the race significantly. However, her campaign has not yet responded to requests for comment.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, who is defending his Senate seat, expressed his satisfaction with Crockett’s candidacy, stating, “She can’t win, so I’m really happy she’s decided to run.” This sentiment reflects a broader Republican strategy that positions progressive candidates as liabilities for the Democratic Party.

While some Democrats see Texas as a potential pickup opportunity for the party, moderate voices within the party are skeptical about the long-term benefits of a progressive candidate like Crockett. Democratic strategist Liam Kerr, co-founder of the centrist group Welcome, recently published a report titled “Deciding to Win,” which cautions that embracing far-left positions could alienate crucial swing voters.

“Any Democrat who can do math should be worried,” Kerr told Fox News Digital, emphasizing that the implications of a progressive candidate extend beyond a single race. He warned that such a strategy could damage the party’s overall brand and hinder down-ballot candidates.

Crockett has garnered attention for her controversial remarks, including calling Texas Governor Greg Abbott “Governor Hot Wheels” and referring to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene in unflattering terms during a House Oversight Committee hearing. Kerr noted that statements like these could further entrench the perception of Democrats as out of touch with mainstream voters.

“When you explicitly say we don’t need Trump voters to win, you’re not only denying mass, you’re denying an opportunity for voters to consider Democrats for other races and in the future,” Kerr added. He urged centrists to engage more actively in the political landscape, mirroring the energy of progressive activists.

Republicans have adopted a narrative that links Crockett’s candidacy to a broader trend of leftward movement within the Democratic Party. Scott stated, “All across the country, what we’re seeing is Jasmine is being repeated, replicated all across the country. Socialism is in vogue in the Democrat Party. It is a sad day around the country for those who believe that the Democrat Party was going to have a comeback. They’re not coming back. We’re going to win, keep the majority, expand the majority all across the map.”

Despite these Republican claims, the Democratic Party has asserted that it remains on the offensive, citing recent gubernatorial wins in Virginia and New Jersey, as well as a competitive special election in Tennessee. However, Scott countered that the presence of progressive candidates in Democratic primaries illustrates the party’s leftward shift.

“The Democrats, you look at who’s in their primaries – cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs,” Scott said, referencing the competitive Democratic field in Michigan, which includes state Sen. Mallory McMorrow and other progressive figures.

Cornyn echoed this sentiment, suggesting that the Democratic Party has become dominated by its left wing. He pointed to the successful campaign of New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani as indicative of this trend, claiming that even established leaders like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer have been influenced by progressive elements within the party.

While the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) has not publicly responded to these criticisms, it maintains that its focus is on winning a Democratic Senate majority. DSCC spokesperson Maeve Coyle stated, “We’ve created a path to do that this cycle by recruiting formidable candidates and expanding the map, building strong general election infrastructure, and disqualifying Republican opponents.”

Democratic commentator Kaivan Shroff, who has ties to the Hillary Clinton campaign, argued that primaries can be beneficial for the party, provided they do not devolve into divisive conflicts. He praised Texas state Rep. James Talarico for committing to a respectful primary process with Crockett.

“I think there’s a great case that it’s a net positive, even win or lose, that Crockett is in this race,” Shroff said, emphasizing the importance of focusing on policy debates rather than personal attacks.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the Democratic Party faces the challenge of navigating its internal divisions while appealing to a broader electorate. Shroff noted the absence of clear leadership to guide candidates through these ideological crossroads, a role that former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi once filled effectively.

The upcoming Senate primaries will not only test the strength of progressive candidates like Crockett but also the Democratic Party’s ability to unify and present a cohesive message to voters ahead of the pivotal 2026 elections, according to Fox News Digital.

Tesla Faces 30-Day Suspension in California Under Elon Musk’s Leadership

Elon Musk’s Tesla is facing a potential 30-day suspension of vehicle sales in California due to allegations of misleading marketing regarding its driver-assistance technology.

Elon Musk’s Tesla has encountered regulatory challenges that could impact its operations in California. According to a report from Bloomberg, the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) is considering a 30-day suspension of Tesla’s vehicle sales in the state. This potential penalty stems from accusations that the company has overstated the capabilities of its driver-assistance technologies, specifically its “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving” (FSD) software.

The DMV has raised concerns that the terminology used by Tesla may mislead consumers into believing that its vehicles are fully autonomous. In reality, these systems require active driver supervision. In light of these allegations, an administrative law judge has recommended that Tesla’s license to sell vehicles in California be suspended for 30 days as a consequence of its marketing practices.

However, Tesla has received a temporary reprieve from the DMV, which has put the suspension on hold. The company now has a 90-day window to either comply with updated marketing guidelines or appeal the decision. This allows Tesla to continue selling vehicles in California while it addresses the concerns raised by regulators.

The case originated from complaints about Tesla’s advertising practices and the potential for consumer misunderstanding regarding the capabilities of its Autopilot and FSD systems. Given that California is one of Tesla’s largest markets in the United States, even a brief suspension could have significant financial repercussions for the company.

Tesla contends that it clearly communicates the limitations of its driver-assistance systems and argues that its naming conventions reflect partial autonomous functionality rather than a fully self-driving capability.

As of late 2025, Musk has achieved a remarkable personal wealth milestone, with his estimated net worth surpassing $600 billion, making him the richest person in modern history. This substantial increase in wealth is largely attributed to the rising valuations of his key companies, particularly SpaceX. A recent insider tender offer valued SpaceX at approximately $800 billion, contributing around $168 billion to Musk’s fortune. His 42% ownership stake in SpaceX is now the primary component of his wealth.

Additionally, Tesla’s stock performance has played a crucial role in bolstering Musk’s net worth. In November 2025, shareholders approved a record-setting pay package for Musk, potentially worth up to $1 trillion in stock over the next decade, contingent on ambitious performance milestones related to market capitalization and strategic execution. However, the potential suspension could pose a challenge for Musk in justifying this substantial pay package.

Looking ahead, SpaceX is preparing for a potential initial public offering (IPO) in 2026, which could value the company at around $1.5 trillion. Such a move would likely propel Musk closer to becoming a trillionaire and could significantly alter global wealth rankings.

Musk’s financial success highlights the extraordinary influence that individual entrepreneurs can exert on global markets, particularly in the fields of technology and space exploration. The long-term implications of his ventures on industry trends, investor confidence, and regulatory frameworks remain uncertain, especially as governments increasingly scrutinize issues related to autonomous driving, artificial intelligence integration, and commercial space activities.

As this situation unfolds, the outcome of Tesla’s regulatory challenges in California will be closely watched, not only for its immediate impact on the company but also for its broader implications within the automotive and technology sectors.

According to Bloomberg, the developments surrounding Tesla’s marketing practices and regulatory scrutiny will continue to shape the landscape of the automotive industry.

Astronauts Return to Earth After ISS Mission to Aid Stranded Crew

A NASA crew, including astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, successfully splashed down in the Pacific after a mission to the ISS that relieved stranded crew members, marking a historic return.

NASA astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, along with two international crew members, made a historic splashdown in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of California on Saturday. This event marked NASA’s first Pacific landing in 50 years.

The crew, which also included Japan’s Takuya Onishi and Russia’s Kirill Peskov, returned to Earth at 11:33 a.m. ET in a SpaceX capsule. This splashdown was the third for SpaceX involving crew members, and it was particularly significant as the last time NASA astronauts splashed down in the Pacific was during the Apollo-Soyuz mission in 1975, which was the first crewed international space mission involving American and Soviet astronauts.

The astronauts launched in March to relieve two crew members, Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, who had been stranded on the International Space Station (ISS) for nine months. Their extended stay was due to issues with the Boeing Starliner capsule, which experienced thruster problems and helium leaks. NASA determined that returning Wilmore and Williams in the Starliner would be too risky, leading to a crewless return of the Starliner while the two astronauts eventually returned home in a SpaceX capsule after their replacements arrived.

Wilmore recently announced his retirement after 25 years with NASA, adding a personal milestone to the mission’s conclusion.

Before departing the ISS, McClain expressed her hopes for the mission, stating, “We want this mission, our mission, to be a reminder of what people can do when we work together, when we explore together,” referencing “some tumultuous times on Earth.” She also looked forward to relaxing at home, while her crewmates were eager for hot showers and burgers.

This year, SpaceX made the decision to shift their splashdown locations from Florida to California to minimize the risk of debris falling on populated areas.

Upon their return, the crew underwent medical checks before being transported by helicopter to meet a NASA aircraft destined for Houston. Steve Stich, manager of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, expressed satisfaction with the mission’s outcome, stating, “Overall, the mission went great, glad to have the crew back. SpaceX did a great job of recovering the crew again on the West Coast.”

Dina Contella, deputy manager for NASA’s International Space Station program, shared her happiness at the crew’s safe return, noting, “They looked great, and they are doing great.” During their 146 days aboard the ISS, the crew orbited the Earth 2,368 times and traveled over 63 million miles.

This successful mission underscores the collaborative efforts of international space agencies and the advancements in commercial space travel, paving the way for future exploration.

According to NASA, the successful splashdown and return of the crew highlight the ongoing commitment to safe and effective space missions.

From Babysitter to Business Owner: An Indian-American’s Journey of Resilience

Muna’s journey from a struggling babysitter to a successful business owner highlights the resilience of immigrants and the vital role they play in American society.

Muna is among the many Somalis who have found refuge in the United States through Temporary Protected Status (TPS) since the onset of civil war in Somalia in 1991. This conflict has claimed the lives of as many as 1 million people, forcing countless others to flee their homeland, often ending up in refugee camps for years.

Arriving in San Diego in 1999 with her 6-month-old baby and no connections, Muna began her American journey by knocking on doors, seeking families in need of a babysitter. Over the next four years, she worked in 20 different households as a nanny and housekeeper, sometimes even sleeping on the floor. Despite the hardships, Muna persevered, and in 2018, she took the bold step of starting her own childcare business, which has since flourished.

“It’s a lot of kids to run,” she said with a laugh. “But it’s worth it.”

Muna’s story is a testament to the resilience and determination often found among immigrants, particularly women who frequently assume caregiving roles in American families. “Everything is hard,” she reflected. “Nothing is easy to become an American and get your papers.”

In her early years in the U.S., Muna faced numerous challenges. She began her work at a starting wage of $6.45 per hour, often enduring difficult living conditions. “When people see you don’t have nothing, they can do anything,” she recalled. The struggles intensified when her daughter faced bullying from boys in the households where they lived.

“I didn’t mind—but when they started hitting my daughter, it was too much,” Muna said, emphasizing the emotional toll of her situation.

Despite these challenges, Muna managed to carve out some time for herself, working at a nearby store. Her determination allowed her to save enough money to rent an apartment, transitioning to a full-time retail position where she eventually became a store manager. Along the way, she met and married a U.S. citizen, welcomed a second daughter, and became a naturalized citizen in 2023.

When Muna decided to start her own business, she chose childcare, opening a small daycare center in her home that is licensed to care for eight children at a time. Her afternoon slots are consistently full, and she often has to turn families away. Muna is now saving to purchase a larger home to accommodate more children, with her daughter assisting her in the business.

As the owner-operator of her daycare, Muna’s responsibilities include caring for infants, transporting children to and from school, taking them to the park and library, and assisting with homework. In addition to her business, she serves on the board of Global Village, a housing project currently under development, and volunteers with the Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans, where she supports newly arrived refugees.

For the first time since moving to the United States, Muna enjoys weekends off. “In the seven years, I know what the Saturday-Sunday thing is,” she said, laughing. “It’s so nice, so nice.”

Muna’s journey reflects not only her personal resilience but also the broader narrative of immigrant contributions to American society. Her story serves as an inspiration to many, illustrating the transformative power of determination and hard work.

According to American Immigration Council, Muna’s experience underscores the vital role that immigrant women play in the caregiving landscape of the United States.

Trump Discusses Revenge and Power in Vanity Fair Profile

White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles has dismissed a recent Vanity Fair profile as a biased portrayal of President Donald Trump’s second term, emphasizing the article’s selective omissions and lack of context.

WASHINGTON, DC – Susie Wiles, the White House Chief of Staff, strongly criticized a Vanity Fair profile published on December 16 that examined the internal dynamics and crises during President Donald Trump’s second term. Wiles labeled the piece a “disingenuously framed hit piece,” arguing that it ignored essential context and selectively omitted comments to depict the administration as chaotic.

The article, authored by Chris Whipple and titled “Susie Wiles, JD Vance, and the ‘Junkyard Dogs’: The White House Chief of Staff on Trump’s Second Term,” is a two-part profile that draws from months of interviews with Wiles.

In the profile, Wiles candidly discussed her experience working for Trump, describing the president as having “an alcoholic’s personality,” despite his reputation as a teetotaler. She acknowledged that many of Trump’s actions during his second term were motivated by a desire for revenge.

The Vanity Fair piece positions Wiles at the center of significant decisions that have purportedly expanded presidential power, including the deployment of National Guard troops, immigration enforcement, and various foreign policy actions. It raises questions about whether Wiles serves to restrain Trump or fully supports his approach. “The question around Wiles’s tenure under Trump has been whether she will do anything to restrain him,” the article posits.

The profile features on-the-record comments from senior officials. Secretary of State Marco Rubio commended Wiles’s relationship with Trump, describing it as “an earned trust,” while JD Vance characterized her role as a facilitator of the president’s agenda. CNN noted that Wiles has maintained Trump’s confidence partly by managing a functional West Wing that does not attempt to curb the president’s impulses.

The article recounts various episodes, including debates over tariffs and immigration enforcement, as well as the restructuring of the U.S. Agency for International Development and its implications for the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. Wiles is quoted as acknowledging disagreements with some actions while emphasizing the importance of execution. “I will concede that we’ve got to look harder at our process for deportation,” she remarked at one point.

On the topic of tariffs, Wiles described significant internal divisions, stating, “There was a huge disagreement over whether [tariffs were] a good idea.” She explained that advisers were instructed to align with Trump’s direction, saying, “This is where we’re going to end up. So, figure out how you can work into what he’s already thinking.”

The profile also delves into Wiles’s management style and her closeness to power. “There’s the president, and then there’s whoever the three high-ranking people are on the sofa,” she explained regarding Oval Office events. “And then there’s a chair at the corner of the sofa, which is my chair.”

Wiles’s response to the Vanity Fair article underscores her commitment to her role and the complexities of navigating the Trump administration’s internal landscape, as she continues to play a pivotal role in shaping policy and strategy.

According to Vanity Fair, Wiles’s insights provide a rare glimpse into the inner workings of a presidency marked by controversy and power struggles.

Ohio Governor Yet to Endorse Indian-American Vivek Ramaswamy

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine has yet to endorse fellow Republican Vivek Ramaswamy in the gubernatorial race, citing the need for further understanding of Ramaswamy’s positions.

CINCINNATI, OH – Ohio Governor Mike DeWine has not yet extended his endorsement to Vivek Ramaswamy, a fellow Republican candidate vying to succeed him. DeWine expressed that he requires more time to familiarize himself with Ramaswamy and his political positions before offering formal support.

The Ohio Republican Party and former President Donald Trump have already endorsed Ramaswamy in the race for governor. However, DeWine remains cautious about his endorsement, emphasizing the importance of understanding the candidate thoroughly.

In comments made to the Ohio Capital Journal on December 15, DeWine stated that he views endorsements as a significant commitment and believes their impact is often overstated. He mentioned that he has met Ramaswamy “only a few times” and is still in the process of getting to know him through ongoing discussions.

“I think it is a process,” DeWine remarked. “An endorsement is a serious thing. I am not sure people really care who endorses whom. Ultimately, it comes down to the candidate. I want to get to know him, and I am still doing that.”

DeWine elaborated on his thoughts during an on-the-record press breakfast on December 11 at the Governor’s Residence outside Columbus. He confirmed that he has had multiple conversations with Ramaswamy and anticipates more policy-focused discussions in the coming months.

Ramaswamy, a newly minted billionaire, has never held elected office. He gained national attention during a long-shot 2024 presidential campaign that positioned him as an outspoken political outsider.

On the Democratic side, Ramaswamy is expected to face former Ohio health director Amy Acton, whose public profile rose significantly during the state’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

As the race unfolds, the dynamics between DeWine, Ramaswamy, and their respective endorsements will be closely watched by political observers and constituents alike.

For further insights, refer to the Ohio Capital Journal.

Border Patrol Commander Returns to Chicago Amid Pepper Ball Deployment

Border Patrol’s intensified Operation Midway Blitz in Chicago has sparked protests as agents deploy pepper balls and detain individuals, drawing criticism from local officials and immigrant advocates.

A senior Border Patrol commander, Gregory Bovino, returned to Chicago on Tuesday, marking a significant escalation in Operation Midway Blitz. This operation has faced considerable backlash from immigrant advocates and local leaders who were not informed of the redeployment of federal agents to the area.

Bovino, who previously became a prominent figure during the Trump administration’s strict immigration policies, was seen in the predominantly Mexican-American neighborhood of Little Village. Videos captured by onlookers showed Border Patrol agents using pepper balls and detaining individuals, raising concerns about the tactics employed in the community.

The return of Bovino comes just a month after he was reassigned to enforcement missions in New Orleans and North Carolina. His presence in Chicago signals a renewed focus on immigration enforcement in the region, which has been a point of contention between state officials and the federal government.

Operation Midway Blitz was initiated in September, named in memory of Katie Abraham, who was tragically killed in a drunk driving hit-and-run allegedly involving Julio Cucul-Bol, an undocumented immigrant from Guatemala. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) stated that the operation aims to “target criminal illegal aliens terrorizing Americans in sanctuary Illinois.”

DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin emphasized the ongoing nature of the operation, stating, “As we said a month ago, we aren’t leaving Chicago, and operations are ongoing.” This declaration has only intensified the scrutiny of the federal government’s actions in the city.

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker expressed his discontent with the lack of communication from federal authorities regarding the return of Bovino and additional Border Patrol agents. He stated he was unaware of how long the agents would remain in Chicago and praised the residents for their efforts to protect their neighborhoods.

“I’m so proud of the people of Illinois for doing as they have, which is to protect their neighborhoods and their neighbors, to do the right thing,” Pritzker remarked, highlighting the community’s response to the federal presence.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson also voiced his concerns, stating that federal agents are “indiscriminately targeting individuals — without warrants.” He condemned the tactics used by the Border Patrol, describing them as “destabilizing” and “wrong.” Johnson noted that these actions have occurred in public spaces, including a Teamster picket line and a local community organization in Little Village.

In response to the ongoing tensions surrounding immigration enforcement, Governor Pritzker recently signed a bill aimed at providing protections for undocumented immigrants in Illinois. This legislation seeks to create new safeguards at various locations, including courthouses, hospitals, college campuses, and other public buildings, to prevent deportation.

The situation in Chicago reflects a broader national debate over immigration policy and enforcement practices, particularly in areas designated as sanctuary cities. As federal operations continue, the community’s response and local government actions will likely play a crucial role in shaping the future of immigration enforcement in the region.

According to The Associated Press, the developments in Chicago underscore the ongoing tensions between federal immigration authorities and local officials committed to protecting their communities.

New Cohort of Communities Selected for Gateways for Growth Challenge

Over ten local communities have been selected for the Gateways for Growth Challenge, aimed at enhancing immigrant inclusion and support across the United States.

WASHINGTON, D.C. & Decatur, GA — On December 15, 2025, the American Immigration Council and Welcoming America announced the selection of over ten local communities to receive awards as part of Round VI of the Gateways for Growth Challenge (G4G). This initiative aims to provide tailored research, technical assistance, and planning support to help communities develop strategies that promote success and inclusion for all residents, including immigrants.

The 2026 awardees represent a diverse array of urban and rural communities across ten states, showcasing the extensive efforts underway to foster welcoming environments led by local governments, nonprofits, chambers of commerce, and community coalitions. Notable communities selected for this round include:

Arlington County, Virginia

Charlotte, North Carolina

Durham, North Carolina

Fort Bend County, Texas

Johnson County, Kansas

Lancaster, Pennsylvania

Las Cruces, New Mexico

Mahoning County, Ohio

St. Louis, Missouri

Wabash County, Indiana

“For nearly a decade, the Gateways for Growth Challenge has helped local communities quantify the impact of their immigrant populations and invest in welcoming policies and programs,” said Rich André, Director of State and Local Initiatives at the American Immigration Council. “We are excited to work with the new cohort in creating opportunity for all residents.”

Molly Hilligoss, senior network director of Welcoming America, emphasized the importance of local leadership in fostering inclusive communities. “This cohort represents local leaders who are doing the day-to-day work of making their communities places where everyone can participate and succeed. We’re proud to support them as they turn their welcoming values into action.”

Since its inception in 2016, the Gateways for Growth Challenge has supported over 75 localities across 37 states. Participating communities have successfully developed welcoming plans that address critical issues such as language access, workforce development, civic participation, and social cohesion. Many have also passed welcoming resolutions, launched new programs, joined the broader Welcoming Network, and achieved Certified Welcoming status—a national recognition for communities that meet established benchmarks for inclusion and welcoming.

For more information about the Gateways for Growth initiative, visit gatewaysforgrowth.org.

About the Gateways for Growth Challenge: The Gateways for Growth Challenge (G4G) is a competitive opportunity for localities to receive research support and technical assistance from the American Immigration Council and Welcoming America to improve immigrant inclusion in their communities. Learn more at gatewaysforgrowth.org.

About Welcoming America: Welcoming America is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization leading a movement to create inclusive communities that thrive by ensuring everyone belongs. Through the Welcoming Network, the organization works to transform systems and culture by providing communities with the necessary roadmap to create welcoming policies and share innovative approaches to inclusion. Learn more at welcomingamerica.org.

About the American Immigration Council: The American Immigration Council aims to strengthen America by shaping public perception and policy regarding immigrants and immigration. The Council advocates for a fair and just immigration system that opens doors to those in need of protection while harnessing the energy and skills that immigrants bring. The organization employs a multifaceted approach to advance change through litigation, research, legislative and administrative advocacy, and communications. Follow them on Bluesky @immcouncil.org and on Instagram @immcouncil.

According to American Immigration Council.

Foreign-Trained Doctors Play Critical Role in American Health Care

Foreign-trained doctors, particularly those from India, play a crucial role in the American healthcare system, contributing significantly to patient care and medical leadership across the country.

Recent reports from esteemed publications such as the Harvard Gazette and The Washington Post have highlighted the vital contributions of foreign-trained doctors to the American healthcare system. As a foreign-trained physician from India, I take pride in being part of this community that has become integral to healthcare in the United States.

Upon arriving in the U.S., many of us aspired to establish ourselves as exemplary medical professionals, spanning various specialties from family medicine to advanced surgical fields. It is not uncommon for Americans to recount experiences of being treated by Indian doctors, even in the most rural areas of the country.

Indian doctors have consistently stepped up to serve in some of the most challenging and underserved regions across the U.S. Notable figures such as Bobby Mukkamala, the current President of the American Medical Association, and Dr. Vivek Murthy, who served as Surgeon General, exemplify the leadership roles that Indian American physicians hold. Additionally, Dr. Ashish Jha, known for his role as the COVID-19 response coordinator, is another testament to the impact of Indian American doctors in both public health and policy.

The emergence of this strong cohort of Indian medical professionals can be traced back to the establishment of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) in 1982. This organization was founded to empower foreign medical graduates (FMGs) and ensure their successful integration into the American healthcare landscape. Today, Indian-origin physicians are responsible for treating one in seven patients in the United States.

AAPI was created to address the unique challenges faced by Indian-origin physicians, many of whom migrated to the U.S. during the 1960s and 1970s. These professionals often encountered obstacles related to credential recognition, professional integration, and adapting to the American healthcare system. According to the AAPI website, the organization aims to unify Indian-American physicians, advocate for their rights, and support their professional and educational needs.

Over the years, AAPI has expanded its mission to encompass a broader range of initiatives, including advocacy, professional development, philanthropy, and fostering relationships between the U.S. and India. The organization advocates not only for the specific interests of Indian American physicians but also addresses wider community health issues. This includes engaging in discussions on healthcare reform, immigration policies, Medicare and Medicaid, and combating discrimination.

Efforts to recognize foreign medical credentials and increase residency opportunities for FMGs remain high on AAPI’s agenda. The organization actively promotes public health initiatives and preventive care, collaborating with various medical and advocacy groups to enhance healthcare delivery.

Each year, AAPI organizes a “Legislative Day” on Capitol Hill, where members engage lawmakers to discuss the challenges faced by Indian American physicians and the healthcare system as a whole. This advocacy extends beyond U.S. borders, as AAPI also hosts the Global Health Summit in India, bringing together U.S. and Indian healthcare professionals to share best practices and discuss global health improvements.

The impact of AAPI’s advocacy is profound, influencing not only the care patients receive in America but also contributing to healthcare advancements in India and beyond. As I prepare to assume the presidency of the Global Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (GAPIO) in February 2026, I am excited about the organization’s vision to build a global network of 1.4 million Indian-origin physicians. This network aims to support countries, including India, in developing healthcare systems tailored to their populations’ needs.

GAPIO seeks to enhance communication among physicians worldwide, regardless of their country of origin, creating a reservoir of knowledge and skills that can benefit healthcare delivery from grassroots to high-level administration.

The 16th Annual GAPIO Conference is scheduled for February 14-15, 2026, in Indore, India, and we encourage participation from medical professionals of all backgrounds to join in this important dialogue.

As a recipient of India’s Padma Shri award and the U.S. Ellis Island Award, I have dedicated my career to improving healthcare access and quality. With 27 clinics in the tri-state area, I also serve as Chairman of Parikh Worldwide Media, which publishes several weekly publications and operates ITV Gold, a 24/7 television channel.

Foreign-trained doctors, particularly those from India, are indeed the backbone of the American healthcare system, and their contributions continue to shape the future of healthcare in the United States.

According to Global Net News.

Vishal Dadlani Sparks Debate Over ‘Vande Mataram’ in Parliament

Music composer Vishal Dadlani’s sarcastic remarks about the parliamentary debate on ‘Vande Mataram’ have sparked a discussion on the priorities of lawmakers in addressing pressing national issues.

MUMBAI – Director Prahlad Kakkar has weighed in on music composer Vishal Dadlani’s recent comments regarding the lengthy parliamentary discussion on ‘Vande Mataram.’ Dadlani’s remarks, infused with irony, questioned why symbolic nationalism often takes precedence in legislative discussions while critical issues like unemployment, inflation, education, and healthcare receive less attention.

In his critique, Dadlani did not name any specific individuals but expressed concern over what he views as misplaced priorities within the political landscape. He highlighted the tendency of lawmakers to engage in debates over symbolic matters rather than addressing pressing societal challenges.

Kakkar responded to Dadlani’s comments, stating, “If you take the politics out of a politician, what’s left? They will remain ordinary people. They are politicians, and politics is their job. You have to do something for leadership. All these controversies and statements don’t matter because leaders will just keep being leaders.”

Earlier, Dadlani had remarked, “Hello, brothers and sisters. I have good news for you. Yesterday, our Parliament debated on ‘Vande Mataram’ for 10 hours. ‘Vande Mataram’ is a very famous and well-known song written by Bankim Chandra Chatterjee. People love it.”

He continued, “It was debated in Parliament, and because of this debate, let me tell you, India’s unemployment problem has been solved. The Indigo problem has been solved. The air pollution problem has been solved. Imagine, a debate was held on a poem for 10 hours. These things were not even mentioned, but all these problems have been solved because of this debate. This debate costs Rs 2.5 lakh per minute of your tax money in Parliament. Ten hours means 600 minutes. Count it.”

Dadlani’s comments resonate with a broader liberal critique that suggests patriotism should be evaluated through the lens of governance, accountability, and the welfare of citizens, rather than through symbolic gestures or enforced slogans. While many supporters view his remarks as a defense of free expression and personal choice, critics have accused him of disrespecting national symbols.

This incident has reignited discussions surrounding the tensions between cultural nationalism and constitutional freedoms in public discourse, reflecting the ongoing debate about the role of symbolism in politics and governance.

According to IANS, this episode underscores the complexities of how national identity and priorities are navigated within the political arena.

Ghost Ships Transporting Illicit Oil Targeted by Trump Administration

President Trump intensifies efforts against a clandestine fleet of “ghost ships” smuggling oil from sanctioned nations, following the seizure of a tanker carrying Venezuelan crude.

A secretive fleet of oil tankers, often referred to as “ghost ships,” has come under increased scrutiny from President Donald Trump as the U.S. intensifies its campaign against illicit oil trade. This clandestine armada, which operates under fake flags and shell companies, has been instrumental in smuggling crude oil from countries like Russia, Iran, and Venezuela, despite existing sanctions.

On December 10, Trump announced the seizure of the tanker “Skipper,” a vessel implicated in the covert transportation of oil in defiance of international sanctions. This seizure marks a significant escalation in the U.S. government’s efforts to disrupt a network of approximately 1,000 tankers that navigate global waters to transport oil from sanctioned nations.

The so-called “ghost ships” employ a variety of tactics to evade detection and enforcement. They sail under foreign flags to obscure their origins, frequently change names, and shift ownership through a complex web of shell companies. Additionally, these vessels disable their transponders to avoid tracking and conduct mid-sea transfers to further disguise their cargo.

As a result, the operation of these ghost ships has created a convoluted system of handoffs and disguised voyages, making it challenging for authorities to monitor their activities effectively.

Benjamin Jensen, director of the Futures Lab at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, emphasized that the issue extends beyond Venezuela. He stated, “I do think it’s time that the United States and other countries start to address what really is a global problem.” Jensen noted that the seizure of the “Skipper” sends a clear message not only to Caracas but also to other nations involved in similar activities.

“What we don’t know is how they’re following that up behind the scenes,” Jensen added, suggesting that further seizures under the Trump administration are likely. He pointed out that Venezuela’s economy is heavily reliant on oil revenue, and even a single interception can have a significant impact. “Anything you do that puts pressure on their ability to bypass sanctions and trade in oil is a direct threat to the economy and, by extension, the regime,” he explained.

The Trump administration has indicated that the seizure of the “Skipper” is merely the beginning of a broader strategy aimed at cutting off the oil revenues that sustain regimes in Moscow, Tehran, and Caracas. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that the vessel is currently undergoing a forfeiture process.

“Right now, the United States currently has a full investigative team on the ground, on the vessel, and individuals on board the vessel are being interviewed, and any relevant evidence is being seized,” Leavitt stated. She added that the U.S. plans to take possession of the oil once the legal process is completed.

This initiative comes at a time when China remains the leading importer of Iranian oil and the second-largest buyer of Russian crude. Much of this oil is transported through a growing fleet of nondescript tankers that evade U.S. sanctions.

Earlier this year, German authorities seized the 19-year-old crude oil tanker “Eventin” after it suffered engine failure in the Baltic Sea. This vessel had previously been identified as one exporting Russian crude oil and other petroleum products. German officials discovered that the Panama-flagged ship, which had undergone several name changes, was carrying approximately 99,000 tons of Russian oil, valued at around $45 million.

The ongoing efforts to combat the operations of these ghost ships highlight the complexities of enforcing sanctions in a globalized economy. As the U.S. government ramps up its actions, the implications for international oil markets and geopolitical relations remain to be seen.

According to Fox News, the Trump administration’s focus on disrupting illicit oil trade signals a commitment to addressing the broader challenges posed by sanctioned nations and their clandestine operations.

Why the U.S. Excluded India from the Pax Silica Framework

The United States has excluded India from its newly launched Pax Silica initiative, raising concerns about geopolitical and economic implications for both nations.

Escalating tensions between the United States and India have surfaced once again, as the U.S. has notably excluded India from its new strategic initiative, Pax Silica. This initiative aims to create a secure and innovative silicon supply chain, encompassing critical minerals, energy inputs, advanced manufacturing, semiconductors, artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure, and logistics.

Pax Silica was formally announced during a summit in Washington, D.C., where representatives from various participating countries signed the Pax Silica Declaration. This declaration affirms their commitment to cooperate on supply chains that are essential for AI, semiconductors, advanced manufacturing, and related infrastructure.

The initiative includes major players such as Japan, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and Australia. Additionally, guest contributions were made by Taiwan, the European Union, Canada, and the OECD. However, India was notably absent from this coalition.

At the inaugural summit, representatives discussed collaborative efforts to strengthen supply chains that span critical minerals, energy inputs, semiconductor production, data centers, and logistics networks. The primary goal of Pax Silica is to reduce dependencies on concentrated sources of critical materials and technology, particularly in light of China’s dominant position in rare earths and chip manufacturing.

By promoting cooperation among allied nations, Pax Silica aims to coordinate research and development, manufacturing, infrastructure investment, and joint ventures in strategic sectors that are vital for AI and future technologies. The initiative also emphasizes the importance of building a trusted and secure technology ecosystem, safeguarding sensitive technologies and infrastructure, and enhancing economic security in a world increasingly driven by AI and advanced computing.

The launch of Pax Silica underscores the growing significance of securing supply chains and technological infrastructure in an era characterized by rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and semiconductor-driven innovation. By uniting leading technology and industrial nations, the initiative reflects a collective effort to reduce reliance on concentrated sources of critical materials, improve resilience, and foster stability across sectors crucial for economic and technological development.

However, the exclusion of certain countries, including India, highlights how strategic, economic, and geopolitical considerations influence participation in global technology partnerships. This exclusion could indicate potential diplomatic or trade tensions, prompting countries outside the initiative to explore alternative strategies for securing resources and maintaining competitiveness in key industries.

India’s exclusion from Pax Silica may limit the initiative’s access to one of the world’s largest and fastest-growing technology markets. The country boasts a significant portion of the global software services industry, a rapidly expanding semiconductor ecosystem, and a large pool of skilled engineers and technology professionals. By not including India, Pax Silica risks missing opportunities to leverage India’s human capital, innovation capabilities, and emerging technology startups, which could enhance research and development efforts, AI deployment, and semiconductor innovation within the coalition.

Moreover, India possesses substantial reserves of certain critical minerals and has burgeoning capabilities in manufacturing and renewable energy, both of which are essential for constructing resilient supply chains. The exclusion from the initiative could hinder collaborative efforts to diversify sourcing of raw materials, mitigate supply chain risks, and establish a broader, more geographically balanced network.

Furthermore, this exclusion may limit Pax Silica’s influence in shaping global standards, technology governance, and trade norms in sectors where India is emerging as a significant player. In the long term, these gaps could diminish the overall effectiveness and reach of Pax Silica’s strategic objectives.

As the global landscape continues to evolve, the implications of India’s exclusion from the Pax Silica initiative will likely resonate across various sectors and influence future diplomatic relations between the United States and India, as well as their respective roles in the global technology ecosystem.

According to The American Bazaar, the ongoing developments surrounding Pax Silica will be closely monitored as countries reassess their strategic partnerships and technological collaborations in response to shifting geopolitical dynamics.

Caring for Afghan Children: Support Initiatives from Kabul to Houston

Safia, an Afghan refugee, navigates the challenges of starting anew in Houston while pursuing her passion for childcare amidst the ongoing crisis in the industry.

Safia is one of the 50,500 Afghan refugees who have been admitted to the United States through the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program. This initiative was established by Congress to assist Afghans who worked for the U.S. government abroad. A college-educated math teacher, Safia is currently not licensed to teach in the United States. She has applied for a childcare training and licensing program at the ECDC – Houston Multicultural Center.

“In order to speed up this self-sufficiency goal, it takes everyone in the household working,” said Earlene Leverett, the former manager of the program. She added, “Employers are finally realizing the impact that childcare has on the economy. Businesses have jobs; they need employees to fill those jobs, and those employees need childcare.”

Safia’s family had a stable life in Afghanistan. She earned her college degree and taught math at an elementary school in Kabul, while her husband worked as an electrical engineer. They were raising three children and seemed to be thriving.

However, the situation changed dramatically when the Taliban regained control of the Afghan government in 2021. Safia’s husband, who had worked for 17 years with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), found himself on a death list, putting the entire family at risk.

Eventually, Safia’s family found refuge in Houston. While they are safe, they face significant economic challenges. Attaining the necessary licensure to work in their respective fields in the United States will take years. Currently, her husband is employed in a lower-level position at an electronics company, while Safia has found only a low-paying job as a helper at a childcare center located far from their home. Without reliable transportation, her commute to work has become a significant obstacle.

“I worked one year in pre-K in Afghanistan,” Safia shared. “I love working with children.” She discovered a free childcare training and licensing class at the ECDC – Houston Multicultural Center, a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting refugees and immigrants. Unfortunately, due to current funding requirements, the course is only available to Afghan refugees who arrived in the United States between 2021 and 2023. Safia, having arrived in 2024, is ineligible.

Earlene Leverett, who managed the ECDC childcare training program for a decade, has witnessed the transformative impact it can have, not only for refugees but also for the wider community. “Childcare is in crisis,” she stated. “Employers are finally realizing the impact that childcare has on the economy. Businesses have jobs; they need employees to fill those jobs, and those employees need childcare.”

During her tenure, Leverett estimates that 350 to 400 immigrants graduated from the one-year program. Many of these graduates have gone on to establish their own childcare businesses, creating essential options for parents who might otherwise struggle to find care. Most graduates have secured employment at existing daycare centers, which often face challenges in expanding due to staffing shortages.

Leverett emphasized the benefits of this program, stating that it is a win for everyone involved. Parents who are already at home with young children—most often mothers—can “add substantially to the household income.” This is particularly important for mothers who need to seek employment outside the home and may prefer childcare providers who share a similar cultural background. Employers, especially in sectors that heavily rely on immigrant labor, such as hospitality and healthcare, can access the workforce they need.

The U.S. government offers some financial assistance to refugees upon their arrival, but this support is short-lived. Nonprofits and other organizations step in to provide language classes and job training, with the goal of helping refugees achieve self-sufficiency within six months.

“In order to speed up this self-sufficiency goal, it takes everyone in the household working,” Leverett reiterated. “When there is no childcare available to the employees, it becomes a huge economic issue.”

Leverett has operated her own daycare centers in Texas for 16 years and noted that immigrants have always played a significant role in the childcare industry as employees.

Providing training for refugees like Safia to obtain childcare licenses has proven effective, according to Leverett. “We saw the difference it made in the community. Employment was one of the key needs,” she said.

Currently, Safia is focused on improving her English skills and finding an affordable program that will enable her to obtain a license to open her own childcare facility. “I like children; I’m patient with children,” she expressed. “I really want to improve in this field and work with children.”

As the childcare crisis continues to unfold, the stories of refugees like Safia highlight the urgent need for accessible training and support systems that can help them rebuild their lives and contribute to their communities.

According to Source Name.

Messi’s India Tour Disrupted by Fan Riots in Kolkata

Chaos erupted during Lionel Messi’s India tour as fans rioted at Salt Lake Stadium in Kolkata, leading to the detention of the event organizer and a public apology from the West Bengal Chief Minister.

Global football icon Lionel Messi’s highly anticipated tour of India began on a chaotic note on Saturday, as unrest broke out at Salt Lake Stadium in Kolkata. Following Messi’s brief appearance at a ticketed event, frustrated fans engaged in violent behavior, ripping up seats, throwing objects onto the pitch, and breaching security protocols.

Authorities confirmed that Satadru Dutta, the chief organizer of the event, has been detained in connection with the disturbances. Rajeev Kumar, Director General of West Bengal Police, stated, “We’ve already detained the main organizer. We’re taking action so that this mismanagement does not go unpunished.”

Messi was scheduled to appear at the stadium for 45 minutes but reportedly left after just 20 minutes, which incited frustration among fans who had paid high ticket prices. Tickets ranged from ₹3,500 (approximately $38.65) to significantly higher amounts on resale platforms, with at least one fan claiming to have paid $130—a considerable sum in a country where the average weekly income is much lower.

As news spread that Messi’s appearance was ending earlier than expected, sections of the crowd became unruly. Fans were seen tearing seats from the stands and throwing them onto the field, while others attempted to climb over fencing to access the pitch.

Eddie Lal Hmangaihzuala, who traveled nearly 1,500 kilometers from Mizoram to attend the event, expressed his disappointment, saying, “I can’t believe there was so much mismanagement. Messi left quickly. I think he felt unsafe. I hardly got a glimpse of him.”

Security personnel struggled to manage the situation, prompting Messi and his entourage to exit the venue sooner than planned. Organizers of the tour did not respond immediately to media inquiries regarding the failures in crowd control and scheduling.

In the aftermath of the chaos, police officials announced that the detained organizer had provided a written assurance that all tickets sold for the event would be refunded. “He has already pledged in writing that tickets sold for the event should be refunded,” Kumar confirmed.

In response to the incident, authorities have increased security measures at subsequent venues on Messi’s tour, amid concerns that similar crowd management issues could arise again.

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee issued a public apology to Messi and the fans, ordering a formal investigation into the incident. Banerjee was en route to the stadium when the unrest occurred. “I am deeply disturbed and shocked by the mismanagement witnessed today at Salt Lake Stadium,” she wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter). “I sincerely apologize to Lionel Messi, as well as to all sports lovers and his fans, for the unfortunate incident.”

She announced the formation of a committee tasked with conducting a detailed inquiry, determining accountability, and recommending measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Messi’s visit to India is part of a multi-city tour that includes concert appearances, youth football clinics, a padel tournament, and the launch of several charitable initiatives. Scheduled stops include Kolkata, Hyderabad, Mumbai, and New Delhi.

Earlier on Saturday, Messi had virtually unveiled a 70-foot statue of himself in Kolkata, an event that garnered significant online engagement and underscored his immense popularity in the country.

While India is predominantly known for its cricket culture, regions such as West Bengal, Kerala, and Goa have a rich football heritage, with generations of fans closely following international football.

Salt Lake Stadium has a history of crowd-related incidents. In 2012, a Kolkata derby match between East Bengal and Mohun Bagan was abandoned after a brick thrown from the stands struck and seriously injured a player. Football legends have long drawn massive crowds in Kolkata; Diego Maradona visited the city twice, and in 2017, he unveiled a statue of himself holding the World Cup before thousands of fans. Messi, too, has a special connection with the venue, having captained Argentina there in 2011 during a friendly match against Venezuela.

Experts in sports management suggest that the incident highlights the risks associated with hosting high-profile global stars without adequate crowd planning. “When expectations are sky-high and transparency is lacking, frustration can escalate quickly,” noted a sports events consultant familiar with large-scale international tours in India.

As investigations continue, the Kolkata incident is likely to serve as a cautionary tale for future organizers of international sporting events in India, where fan passion, if not properly managed, can lead to disorder, according to Global Net News.

School Shootings in the United States: Key Facts and Trends

The United States faces an ongoing crisis of gun violence in schools, with 75 shootings reported in 2025, highlighting alarming trends that continue to escalate.

The United States continues to grapple with persistent gun violence on school grounds, with at least 75 school shootings recorded so far this year. This troubling trend shows little sign of abating. As of December 13, incidents of gun violence on educational campuses have claimed at least 31 lives and left more than 100 others injured, according to a CNN analysis that draws on data from the Gun Violence Archive, Education Week, and Everytown for Gun Safety.

Of the total incidents reported this year, 43 occurred on college and university campuses, while 32 took place on K-12 school grounds. This highlights that gun violence is not confined to any single level of the education system. CNN cross-checks all reported cases against school records, police statements, and media reports to ensure accuracy.

For tracking purposes, a school shooting is defined as any incident in which a firearm is discharged on school property—from kindergartens through colleges—resulting in at least one person being shot, excluding the shooter. School property includes buildings, parking lots, athletic fields, stadiums, and school buses. Accidental discharges are also included, provided a person other than the shooter is injured. Incidents involving only law enforcement or school security personnel are excluded.

A Post-Pandemic Surge

The data shows that gun violence on school grounds declined sharply during 2020, when schools across the country were largely closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, that decline proved temporary.

Since in-person learning resumed, school shootings have surged to record levels. Each year from 2021 through 2025 has set annual records for school shootings since at least 2008, when CNN began systematically tracking such incidents.

While 2024 saw at least 83 school shootings, making it one of the most violent years on record, 2022 stands out as one of the deadliest. That year recorded 47 fatalities, including the mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, where 19 students and two educators were killed, and more than a dozen others were wounded.

“These numbers reflect a structural crisis, not isolated tragedies,” said a gun violence researcher. “The consistency of the trend suggests that the conditions enabling school shootings remain firmly in place.”

How 2025 Compares So Far

As of December 13—the 347th day of the year—the U.S. has recorded 75 school shootings in 2025, putting it on pace to rival or exceed totals from previous years.

Education advocates warn that the steady drumbeat of violence has taken a toll on both students and educators. Across the country, students have organized protests and advocacy campaigns calling for stricter gun laws, while some teachers have cited safety concerns as a reason for leaving the profession altogether.

“Schools are meant to be places of learning and safety,” said a former high school teacher who left the classroom after a nearby shooting. “When that sense of safety disappears, it affects everything—from mental health to academic performance.”

Geographic Patterns

CNN’s long-term analysis reveals stark geographic disparities in school shooting rates. Several Southern states have recorded some of the highest rates of school shootings relative to population since 2008.

Washington, D.C., recorded the highest per-capita rate, with six school shootings, translating to nearly one incident per 100,000 residents. Texas has recorded the highest overall number of school shootings—65 incidents since 2008—reflecting both its large population and its permissive gun laws, according to analysts.

In contrast, only four states—Montana, Wyoming, New Hampshire, and Vermont—have recorded zero school shootings during the same period.

A notable milestone occurred on December 13, when a mass shooting at Brown University marked Rhode Island’s first school shooting since at least 2008, underscoring how even states with historically low gun violence are no longer immune.

A Growing National Reckoning

Public health experts increasingly frame school shootings as a preventable crisis rather than an inevitability. Research has consistently linked firearm access, lack of safe storage, and gaps in mental health support to gun violence on campuses.

“Every year without comprehensive reform normalizes the unacceptable,” said a public safety policy expert. “The data is not just a record of past violence—it’s a warning about what lies ahead if nothing changes.”

As lawmakers remain deeply divided over gun control, the growing body count and rising incident numbers continue to fuel calls for federal and state-level action. For students, parents, and educators, the statistics represent more than numbers—they reflect an ongoing reality of fear, trauma, and loss inside America’s schools, according to CNN.

Andaman Islands Key to US-India Maritime Strategy Against China

Experts emphasize the strategic importance of India’s Andaman and Nicobar Islands for US-India maritime cooperation in countering China’s influence in the Indo-Pacific region.

In a recent hearing before the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on South and Central Asia, experts highlighted the critical role of India’s Andaman and Nicobar Islands in the evolving maritime strategy between the United States and India. Located at the strategic mouth of the Strait of Malacca, these islands are increasingly viewed as a vital asset for enhancing cooperation between the two nations.

Jeff Smith, a representative from the Heritage Foundation, addressed lawmakers on December 10, asserting that the Andaman and Nicobar Islands provide India with unparalleled visibility over one of the world’s most significant maritime chokepoints. He stated, “I would like to see even more US and Indian cooperation around that location,” advocating for expanded intelligence-sharing and integrated surveillance efforts.

Smith pointed out that China has been deploying submarines into the Indian Ocean since around 2013-2014, dismissing Beijing’s claims that these missions are solely for anti-piracy purposes. “Most of us know you don’t need a nuclear submarine to counter pirates off the Somali coast,” he remarked, emphasizing the broader implications of China’s military presence in the region.

He elaborated on the multifaceted nature of the rivalry between India and China, noting that it encompasses both land and maritime disputes. “They have the border dispute issue, but there’s also a maritime component to the rivalry, and that has been heating up considerably,” Smith explained. He underscored the importance of maintaining US access to Diego Garcia, a strategic base in the Indian Ocean, while also recognizing the significance of India’s naval capabilities at the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

Smith reiterated the strategic value of the islands, stating, “And frankly, this is an extremely valuable asset for any country. Certainly, for India. I would like to see even more US-Indian cooperation in that area, as it allows both of us to monitor traffic entering and exiting the Indian Ocean from the Western Pacific.”

Dhruva Jaishankar, another expert present at the hearing, provided insights into India’s expanding naval capabilities. He noted that the Indian Navy has increased its patrol frequency, broadened its humanitarian and anti-piracy missions, and enhanced collaborative exercises with partners in the Western Pacific, including nations such as South Korea, Australia, Papua New Guinea, Fiji, and around Guam.

Witnesses at the hearing argued that maritime cooperation is essential for countering China’s strategic initiatives in the Indo-Pacific. Committee Chairman Bill Huizenga expressed concern over China’s “string of pearls” strategy, which he described as an overt attempt to encircle and control the Indian Ocean. He emphasized that ensuring free sea lanes is vital for global economic stability.

In light of these developments, Smith urged Congress to take proactive measures to facilitate defense co-production, expedite export clearances, and strengthen intelligence agreements. These steps, he argued, would enable both the United States and India to effectively track submarine movements and monitor Chinese naval deployments in the region.

The discussions during the hearing underscore the growing recognition of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands as a strategic asset in the broader context of US-India relations and their shared interests in maintaining stability in the Indo-Pacific region. As both nations navigate the complexities of their maritime strategies, the importance of cooperation and collaboration will likely continue to shape their approaches to regional security.

According to IANS, the strategic dialogue surrounding the Andaman and Nicobar Islands reflects a critical juncture in US-India maritime cooperation, particularly in the face of increasing challenges posed by China.

India’s Cultural Shift: From ‘Anything Goes’ to ‘Yes Means Yes’

In a follow-up to his previous column, Vinson Xavier Palathingal discusses the importance of assimilation for Indians living in the West, advocating for a cultural shift towards integrity and accountability.

Assimilation is not about abandoning one’s roots; it is about understanding the values of the society we choose to live in and adapting with honesty and humility. In my last column, “India vs. West: Why ‘Yes Means Yes’ Beats ‘Sub Kuch Chalta Hai’ (‘Anything Goes’) in a Rules-Driven World,” published on December 11, 2025, I argued that while talent and intelligence have taken Indians far, true respect abroad will come only when integrity, punctuality, and reliability define the Indian global identity.

The response to that piece has been intense, particularly from fellow Indians and many within the Hindu community. Such reactions were not unexpected. When long-held cultural assumptions are examined at their roots, discomfort is inevitable. This follow-up is not intended to argue with critics or trade accusations but to clarify intent, correct misunderstandings, and deepen the discussion around the root causes I believe we must honestly confront.

This discourse is not meant to frame India and the West as competitors. Rather, it seeks to understand why two civilizations evolved differently and what responsibilities naturally fall on those who leave one system and choose to live within another.

Assimilation is the responsibility of minorities everywhere. Let me begin with absolute clarity: I am not finding fault with India, Hinduism, or Indian culture as a whole. Instead, I am pointing out the foundational logic behind two different civilizational systems and explaining why friction arises when people transition from one to the other.

Migration flows overwhelmingly from India to the West, not the other way around. This simple fact matters. Wherever people migrate and become a minority, they must recalibrate their beliefs and behaviors to assimilate into the host society. This principle applies universally, including within India itself. Indians instinctively understand this when minorities attempt to alter India’s cultural or social norms. The same logic applies in reverse.

If Indians choose to live in Western societies and benefit from their freedoms, institutions, and protections, then adaptation should not be viewed as submission; it is a sign of maturity. This is not asking too much of Indians; it is asking what every civilization expects of newcomers.

We must confront an uncomfortable but necessary observation: the deep injustices embedded in the Indian caste system were never meaningfully corrected from within Hindu society over centuries. Real reform required external influence—Western legal frameworks, Christian missionary education, British administrative intervention, and later constitutional enforcement. In contrast, the West’s gravest moral failures, such as slavery and segregation, were confronted and corrected largely from within. Abolitionists quoted the Bible, and civil rights leaders appealed to moral absolutes already embedded in Western thought. The system possessed the philosophical tools needed for its own correction.

This is not an insult; it is an observation. Today, many Indians celebrate economic success in the West without acknowledging the moral and institutional foundations that made such success possible. As someone trained in root cause analysis, I am not interested in celebrating outcomes while ignoring inputs. My focus is on fixing causes, not defending pride or manufacturing excuses.

Another factor that must be acknowledged is the impact of post-independence socialism in India. The country chose decades of centralized control, government ownership, and diluted personal responsibility. When everything belongs to the government, nothing truly belongs to the citizen. When no one owns the system personally, abusing it feels morally neutral.

This mindset is captured perfectly in two Malayalam adages many of us grew up hearing. The first suggests that resources exist to be exploited rather than respected, reflecting a worldview where bending rules is seen as cleverness rather than dishonesty. This mindset does not translate well into societies where ownership, accountability, and consequences are personal and immediate.

Western systems are generally simpler, more direct, and easier to implement. This simplicity is precisely why progress becomes visible faster. In contrast, Indian systems are ancient, layered, and deeply nuanced. They are broad and deep but also complex and slow to adapt. There is no shame in this difference.

However, the direction of movement matters. Indians migrate to the West in search of opportunity, not the other way around. Those who arrive cannot expect to reshape local norms without resistance. Any society would view such attempts as invasive. Indians understand this instinctively when the discussion is about India, and the same principle applies abroad.

This discussion is not about cultural superiority; there is no scoreboard. We are immigrants. Assimilation is not weakness; it is the strongest investment we can make in our children’s future. Recognizing this reality is not bootlicking, as some have accused me of; it is realism.

I call America my home because it is my children’s home. Wanting harmony, safety, and dignity for them requires honest self-correction, not defensive outrage. The West’s strength lies in its ability to correct course simply and without drama. That trait is worth learning, not mocking.

To clarify, I never said anything negative about India or Indian culture. I spoke directly and exclusively to Indians who have immigrated to the West, urging them to recalibrate their beliefs around rules, fairness, punctuality, and integrity. Nothing more.

Name-calling does not solve root causes. Emotional reactions do not fix systemic friction. Honest self-assessment does. My goal remains unchanged from the previous column: to protect Indians abroad, reduce resentment before it hardens into hostility, and encourage assimilation so our children inherit opportunity rather than suspicion. That requires courage and, above all, honesty.

According to The American Bazaar, this ongoing dialogue is essential for fostering understanding and respect between cultures.

Elizabeth Warren Invites Nvidia CEO to Testify on Trump Policies

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren has summoned Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to testify regarding President Trump’s approval of AI chip sales to China, raising concerns over national security and technological leadership.

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren is taking a stand against President Donald Trump by calling on Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to testify before Congress. This request comes in response to Trump’s recent announcement that he would greenlight the sale of Nvidia’s second-most advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chip to China.

Warren expressed her concerns during a press conference, questioning whether Trump would “muzzle his own Justice Department because he does not want Americans to know that he is selling out our national security?” This statement underscores her apprehension regarding the implications of exporting advanced technology to foreign nations.

The senator’s call for testimony follows a significant policy shift that allows high-performance AI hardware to be sold internationally under U.S. export regulations. Warren emphasized the necessity of Congressional oversight to ensure that these advanced chips are not utilized in ways that could jeopardize U.S. technological leadership or compromise sensitive applications.

In response to these concerns, White House spokesman Kush Desai clarified the administration’s position. He stated, “There’s an obvious difference between chips being illegally smuggled to unknown buyers without regulatory oversight and chips being exported following national security inspections to specifically designated end users.”

The U.S. government recently approved the export of Nvidia’s H200 artificial intelligence chips to China, marking a notable change in long-standing export controls on advanced semiconductor technology. The H200 is a high-performance AI accelerator designed for complex machine learning and data center workloads. This decision allows Nvidia to sell these chips to approved Chinese customers, contingent upon U.S. government licensing and oversight.

Trump’s policy change includes a provision for the U.S. government to collect a 25% share of the revenue generated from these sales as part of the export framework. Nvidia has indicated that China constitutes a relatively small segment of its advanced chip business and that all exports will adhere to licensing requirements.

This move represents a partial reversal of previous export restrictions that prohibited the shipment of H200-class GPUs to China due to national security concerns, although the most advanced chips remain off-limits. Nvidia has reiterated that sales of the H200 to China will still require a U.S. government license and has characterized the overall share of chips sold to China as a minor percentage compared to those sold to U.S. customers.

As companies like Nvidia operate at the cutting edge of innovation, their products can have far-reaching implications beyond commercial markets, affecting global competitiveness, supply chains, and national defense capabilities. Policymakers face the challenge of balancing economic benefits with national security considerations while striving to maintain technological leadership.

Warren’s call for Congressional oversight highlights the critical role lawmakers play in ensuring that commercial interests do not undermine strategic priorities. The potential impact of Congressional hearings, public scrutiny, and future policy changes on subsequent decisions regarding AI hardware exports remains uncertain.

As AI hardware continues to evolve and become more widely distributed, nations must navigate not only domestic regulations but also the broader implications of exports on global security, economic stability, and technological ecosystems. Collaboration among industry leaders, government officials, and international partners is essential to establish safeguards that prevent misuse, promote innovation, and ensure fair competition.

According to The American Bazaar, the unfolding situation emphasizes the need for vigilance in the face of rapidly advancing technology and its potential effects on national security.

Air India Highlights Unique Kerala Experience for Travelers

Air India has launched the “Untold Kerala” campaign, inviting travelers to explore the rich cultural narratives and immersive experiences of Kerala, beyond its popular tourist attractions.

Air India Limited has unveiled its latest cultural travel initiative, titled “Untold Kerala.” This campaign aims to inspire travelers to venture beyond conventional itineraries and discover the deeper stories of one of India’s most celebrated destinations.

Shared with members of the Maharaja Club, the campaign positions Kerala not merely as a picturesque getaway but as a vibrant tapestry of heritage, tradition, and discovery.

“Kerala is more than its backwaters and beaches—it is a land of stories waiting to be told,” an Air India spokesperson stated in the announcement. “Through Untold Kerala, we want to connect travelers with experiences that resonate on a cultural and emotional level.”

The campaign features several key elements designed to enhance the travel experience. One notable aspect is the Namaste.ai Travel Series, a digital magazine that invites readers to “turn the pages” and explore inspiring tales that encourage journeys beyond the map.

Additionally, the campaign emphasizes cultural immersion, showcasing authentic encounters with local traditions, from temple festivals to village life along the backwaters. This focus aims to provide travelers with experiences that go beyond typical tourist clichés.

To facilitate these explorations, the campaign is accessible through Air India’s mobile app, which offers travelers seamless planning tools alongside curated storytelling.

Often referred to as “God’s Own Country,” Kerala has long attracted international travelers with its lush landscapes, Ayurvedic wellness, and houseboat cruises. However, Air India’s new campaign seeks to reframe this narrative by highlighting lesser-known aspects of the region, such as oral traditions, local artisans, and community-driven tourism.

This approach reflects a growing trend in global travel marketing, where airlines are increasingly positioning themselves as cultural ambassadors rather than mere carriers. By weaving storytelling into destination promotion, Air India taps into the rising demand for meaningful, immersive travel experiences.

Travel analysts note that campaigns like Untold Kerala align with the post-pandemic traveler’s desire for authenticity. “People are no longer satisfied with surface-level sightseeing,” said a tourism expert. “They want to engage with local communities, understand traditions, and return home with stories that feel personal.”

Furthermore, Air India’s initiative strengthens its brand identity as a national carrier that champions India’s cultural diversity. By highlighting Kerala’s untold stories, the airline underscores its role as both a connector of destinations and a curator of experiences.

The Untold Kerala campaign is part of Air India’s broader strategy to enhance customer engagement through storytelling and digital innovation. For travelers, it offers an opportunity to rediscover Kerala through fresh eyes—where every journey becomes not just a trip, but a narrative unfolding.

According to Source Name, this initiative represents a significant shift in how travel experiences are marketed, focusing on deeper connections and cultural engagement.

FBI Dismisses Reinstated Whistleblower for Unauthorized Media Discussions

FBI agent Steve Friend, a whistleblower reinstated under the Trump administration, was dismissed for “unprofessional conduct” after unauthorized media interactions, raising concerns over retaliation within the bureau.

Steve Friend, a former FBI agent and whistleblower who gained attention during the COVID-19 pandemic, was fired from the bureau on Friday. His dismissal comes just months after he was reinstated under the Trump administration.

According to a termination letter shared by New York Post columnist Miranda Devine on X, the FBI cited “unprofessional conduct and poor judgment” as the reasons for Friend’s firing. An FBI source confirmed the dismissal but declined to provide further details, labeling it a personnel matter.

The termination letter outlined specific actions that led to Friend’s dismissal, including his participation in unauthorized interactions with the media. The FBI noted that he publicly disseminated media sources and made comments regarding ongoing investigations, which violated bureau protocols.

Friend’s troubles with the FBI began in August 2022 when he was suspended. He subsequently resigned in February 2023 but was reinstated in September of the same year. The recent firing has raised alarms among some lawmakers, with House Republicans accusing the Biden administration’s FBI of retaliating against Friend for exposing alleged misconduct within the bureau.

In the termination letter, the FBI highlighted an incident from November in which Friend allegedly disseminated media sources and photographs identifying an alleged subject. He reportedly discussed this subject on his podcast without credible evidence to support the claims.

When contacted for comment by Fox News Digital, Friend suggested that his dismissal was a form of retaliation orchestrated by FBI Director Kash Patel.

Friend’s legal representation faced challenges as well. His attorneys at Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research withdrew from representing him on December 5, citing his failure to heed their advice regarding public comments on FBI matters. The nonprofit organization expressed concern that his actions could lead to further adverse administrative action from the bureau.

In a letter to Friend, Empower Oversight stated, “In light of your apparent unwillingness to follow the free professional advice we have given you, we are even more convinced that our previously expressed inability to represent you regarding any legal matters other than your reinstatement was warranted.” They concluded that they could no longer allocate time and resources to his case.

Friend’s situation has sparked discussions about the treatment of whistleblowers within the FBI and the broader implications for transparency and accountability in federal agencies. As the fallout from his dismissal continues, many are left questioning the agency’s commitment to protecting those who speak out against misconduct.

According to Fox News, the circumstances surrounding Friend’s firing highlight ongoing tensions within the FBI regarding whistleblower protections and the agency’s internal culture.

Trump’s Knowledge and Perception Highlighted in Recent Commentary

Donald J. Trump continues to position himself as a global peacemaker while navigating controversies and criticism, asserting his influence both domestically and abroad.

In recent weeks, Donald J. Trump has made headlines for his self-proclaimed role as a peacemaker, a title he has embraced amidst a series of contentious events and remarks. His latest endeavors include a controversial association with the United States Institute of Peace, which has drawn criticism for its perceived alignment with his administration.

Trump, who has dubbed himself the “Peacemaker-in-Chief,” recently received a dubious peace prize from FIFA, which critics have labeled the “appease prize.” He donned the medal at the prestigious Kennedy Center Honors in Washington, D.C., becoming the first sitting president to host the event in its 47-year history. While he was involved in selecting the five honorees, he humorously refrained from nominating himself, instead suggesting a hypothetical “Trump-Kennedy Center.”

During the event, Trump claimed his show was receiving “rave reviews,” asserting, “This is the greatest evening in the history of the Kennedy Center – not even a contest.” He anticipated negative coverage from the media, stating, “I guarantee the fake news is going to give me horrible reviews.”

As his poll numbers dipped due to criticism over his economic policies, Trump traveled to Pennsylvania to tout his record, claiming credit for “lower prices” and “bigger paychecks.” A massive sign behind him echoed these assertions. However, he veered off script, making incendiary remarks about immigrants from “shithole countries,” disparaging wind energy, and mocking transgender individuals. He also referred to President Joe Biden in a derogatory manner.

In an interview with Politico, Trump awarded himself an “A-plus-plus-plus-plus-plus” for his economic performance, defending his international trips as beneficial for securing investments for Americans. His comments about Europe were particularly striking, as he described the continent as “decaying” and “weak” for its handling of migration and the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict. He expressed confidence in his ability to advise European leaders, stating, “I have eyes. I have ears. I have, er, knowledge. I have vast knowledge.”

Despite his assertions of a hands-off approach, Trump indicated he would support European political candidates who aligned with his views. He characterized cities like London and Paris as struggling under the weight of migration from the Middle East and Africa, suggesting that without policy changes, some European nations “will not be viable countries any longer.”

In a striking warning, Trump stated that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s “days are numbered,” hinting at the possibility of U.S. military action against Venezuela to combat drug trafficking. When asked about similar actions against Mexican or Colombian interests, he replied, “Sure, I would.”

Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, praised the U.S. for seizing an oil tanker off Venezuela’s coast, claiming it was necessary to undermine Maduro’s regime. She revealed that the U.S. had assisted her in escaping Venezuela after a year in hiding.

In a surprising turn, House Democrats released a second batch of photographs from the estate of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, featuring Trump alongside other prominent figures. The White House quickly dismissed the release as a politically motivated attempt to create a false narrative, with a spokesperson asserting that the “Democrat hoax against President Trump has been repeatedly debunked.”

Amidst ongoing scrutiny, Trump took to Truth Social to defend his work ethic, asserting, “There has never been a President that has worked as hard as me! My hours are the longest, and my results are among the best.” He claimed to have “ACED” physical, mental, and cognitive tests with “PERFECT Marks,” suggesting that media outlets like The New York Times were engaging in “seditious” behavior by publishing negative reports about him.

In a continuation of his media critique, the White House released a list of “Media Offenders of the Week,” featuring a video of Santa Claus announcing the naughty list. The list included journalists from various outlets, while late-night host Jimmy Kimmel managed to avoid mention despite his humorous take on Trump’s immigration policies.

Trump concluded the week by sharing images of his accomplishments, one of which depicted him as the “PEACEMAKER-IN-CHIEF.” His supporters responded with memes, one notably portraying him as Superman, emphasizing his “big eyes, big ears, and a big head.”

As Trump navigates the complexities of his presidency, he continues to assert his influence both at home and abroad, positioning himself as a key player on the global stage.

For further insights, see The American Bazaar.

AAPI President Dr. Amit Chakrabarty Strengthens Community Bonds with Chapter Visits

Chicago, IL – The American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) President, Dr. Amit Chakrabarty, completed a series of three landmark chapter visits in November, underscoring AAPI’s mission of unity, service, and cultural pride. His engagements in Chicago, Tampa, and Alabama highlighted the organization’s deep roots, vibrant present, and ambitious future.

Chicago – IAMA Annual Day (November 9, 2025)

Dr. Chakrabarty began the month in Chicago, joining the Indian American Medical Association (IAMA) for its Annual Day celebrations. Chicago has long been a cornerstone of AAPI’s leadership, having produced three past presidents and now welcoming incoming President Dr. Meher Medavaram.

“Chicago holds a special place in AAPI’s history,” he said. “This great city has given us three Past Presidents and now welcomes one incoming President — Dr. Meher Medavaram, from the IAMA chapter. Her leadership promises continuity, innovation, and a renewed commitment to our values. With her vision and your unwavering support, I am confident that AAPI will continue to rise to new heights.”

In her remarks, Dr. Medavaram highlighted the growth of AAPI as the prominent national organization that represents the collective voice of the physicians of Indian origin. “Physicians of Indian Origin have long been recognized as leading healthcare providers, holding key positions in hospitals and healthcare facilities across the United States and worldwide. As a prominent ethnic medical organization representing nearly 100,000 physicians and fellows of Indian origin, AAPI serves as the collective voice of its members, providing a platform to address their diverse needs and advocate for the wellbeing of their communities both in the U.S. and India,” the incoming President of AAPI said.

The event also carried symbolic weight, as AAPI’s national office is located in the Chicago suburb, making the chapter both a hub of leadership and a home to the organization’s heartbeat.

Tampa – FAPI Annual Day (November 15, 2025)

The following week, Dr. Chakrabarty traveled to Tampa to join the Florida Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (FAPI) for its Annual Day celebrations. Welcomed warmly by President Dr. Saurin Shah, Past President Dr. Rakesh Sharma, and other leaders, the event showcased Tampa’s vibrant role as a hub of Indian heritage and professional service.

The visit also served as a preview for AAPI’s Annual Convention in Tampa (July 4, 2026). Convention Chair Dr. Sagar Galwankar and Convener Dr. Raghu Juvvadi rallied enthusiasm and support, ensuring the groundwork for a landmark event.

Dr. Chakrabarty described the chapter’s energy as both celebratory and forward-looking. “This visit was not only a celebration of the present but also a bridge to the future. Together, we will make the Tampa convention a landmark event—one that honors our traditions, strengthens our professional community, and leaves a legacy of unity and pride,” he noted.

Alabama – AAPI Annual Day (November 22, 2025)

Dr. Chakrabarty concluded the month with a deeply personal visit to Alabama, where he was honored as Guest of Honor at the Alabama AAPI Annual Day. The occasion marked a full-circle moment, as his

AAPI journey began in Alabama more than three decades ago.

Standing before colleagues, mentors, and friends who shaped his earliest steps in the community, in Huntsville, Alabama, Dr. Chakrabarty reflected on the chapter’s enduring spirit of service and cultural pride. “Leadership is never a solitary pursuit but a collective endeavor. Alabama has always stood by me, even during moments of challenge. This homecoming is a reminder of the responsibility we carry to nurture the next generation and celebrate our contributors,” he said.

The Alabama chapter’s recognition underscored the values of solidarity and resilience that define AAPI nationwide.

AAPI’s Broader Mission

These three engagements collectively highlighted AAPI’s strength as a national family rooted in tradition and driven by compassion. From Chicago’s leadership legacy to Tampa’s future convention stage, and Alabama’s heartfelt homecoming, Dr. Chakrabarty’s November visits reaffirmed AAPI’s commitment to advocacy, unity, and cultural integration.

 “Each chapter visit is a reminder that our strength lies in our collective spirit. Whether celebrating milestones, preparing for future conventions, or honoring our roots, AAPI continues to thrive because of the dedication of its members nationwide,” Dr. Chakrabarty concluded.

About AAPI

Founded in 1982, the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) represents over 100,000 physicians, residents, and medical students of Indian origin in the United States. AAPI serves as a strong voice for advocacy, professional excellence, and cultural integration, working to strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and promote community service across the nation.

For more information or to reserve a spot at future events, visit www.aapiusa.org.

Fox News AI Newsletter: Hegseth Aims to Transform American Warfare

The Pentagon has launched GenAI.mil, a military-focused AI platform powered by Google Gemini, aimed at transforming U.S. warfighting capabilities, according to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

The Fox News AI Newsletter provides readers with the latest advancements in artificial intelligence technology, highlighting both the challenges and opportunities that AI presents in various sectors, including defense.

In a significant development, the Pentagon has announced the launch of GenAI.mil, a military-focused AI platform powered by Google Gemini. In a video obtained by FOX Business, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth emphasized that the platform is designed to provide U.S. military personnel with direct access to AI tools, aiming to “revolutioniz[e] the way we win.”

In other news, Disney CEO Bob Iger defended the company’s recent $1 billion equity investment in OpenAI, assuring creators that their jobs would not be threatened by the integration of AI into the entertainment industry.

President Donald Trump responded to a report regarding the global artificial intelligence arms race, which claimed that China possesses more than double the electrical power-generation capacity of the United States. Trump asserted that every AI plant being built in the U.S. will be self-sustaining, equipped with its own electricity.

U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright recently stated that America’s top scientific priority is AI. While there is ongoing debate about how to regulate artificial intelligence and what safeguards should be in place, there is broad bipartisan agreement on the potential of this technology to transform global operations.

On a lighter note, panelists on the show ‘Outnumbered’ reacted to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s candid admission that he “cannot imagine” raising his newborn son without assistance from ChatGPT.

Former Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona has warned that the U.S. risks losing its global leadership in artificial intelligence to China. She emphasized that the AI race is a matter of national security that the nation must “win.”

In a notable recognition, Time magazine announced “Architects of AI” as its 2025 Person of the Year, opting for a collective acknowledgment rather than selecting a single individual for the honor.

In a legal development, the heirs of an 83-year-old woman who was killed by her son in Connecticut have filed a wrongful death lawsuit against OpenAI and its business partner Microsoft. They claim that the AI chatbot amplified the son’s “paranoid delusions.”

California Governor Gavin Newsom took a jab at President Trump’s administration by sharing an AI-generated video that depicted Trump, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller in handcuffs.

In legislative news, a bipartisan group of House lawmakers introduced a bill requiring federal agencies and officials to label any AI-generated content shared through official government channels.

The U.S. Navy has issued a warning that the country must treat shipbuilding and weapons production with the urgency of a nation preparing for conflict. Navy Secretary John Phelan stated that the service “cannot afford to stay comfortable” amid challenges such as submarine delays and supply-chain failures.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer accused President Trump of “selling out America” following the announcement that the U.S. will permit Nvidia to export its artificial intelligence chips to China and other countries.

White House science and technology advisor Michael Kratsios urged G7 tech ministers to eliminate regulatory obstacles to AI adoption. He cautioned that outdated oversight frameworks could hinder the innovation necessary to unlock AI-driven productivity.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon offered an optimistic perspective on artificial intelligence, predicting that the technology will not “dramatically reduce” jobs over the next year, provided it is effectively regulated.

As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, it is becoming increasingly powerful. However, there are concerns about AI models sometimes finding shortcuts to achieve success, a behavior known as reward hacking. This occurs when an AI exploits flaws in its training goals to achieve high scores without genuinely addressing the intended objectives.

Stay informed about the latest advancements in AI technology and explore the challenges and opportunities it presents for the future with Fox News.

According to Fox News.

Iran Detains Nobel Laureate Narges Mohammadi; Rights Groups Call for Release

Iran has detained Narges Mohammadi, the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, prompting international calls for her immediate release amid concerns over the country’s crackdown on dissent.

Iranian authorities have arrested Narges Mohammadi, the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize laureate and a leading advocate for human rights in the country, according to her family and the Narges Foundation. The Paris-based organization reported that Mohammadi was forcibly taken into custody on Friday while attending a memorial service in Mashhad, Iran’s second-largest city.

The memorial was held in honor of Khosrow Alikordi, a lawyer and civil rights supporter who was recently found dead in his office. Mohammadi’s brother, Mehdi, confirmed the arrest, describing it as a violent detention executed by security and police forces.

This incident has drawn widespread international condemnation, with rights organizations warning that Iran is intensifying its crackdown on dissent.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee quickly denounced the detention, labeling it “brutal” and demanding Mohammadi’s immediate and unconditional release. In a statement, the committee called on Iranian authorities to clarify Mohammadi’s whereabouts, ensure her safety, and release her without delay. They expressed solidarity with her and others in Iran who advocate for human rights, freedom of expression, and the rule of law.

Mohammadi was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2023 for her decades-long struggle against oppression, particularly her advocacy for women’s rights and her opposition to Iran’s use of capital punishment.

Throughout the past two decades, Mohammadi has spent a significant portion of her life imprisoned in Tehran’s Evin Prison, a facility notorious for housing political dissidents. According to her foundation, she has received multiple convictions totaling 36 years in prison on charges that include acting against national security and spreading propaganda against the state.

In December 2024, Iranian authorities temporarily suspended her sentence for three weeks to allow her to recover from surgery to remove part of a bone in her lower leg, where doctors had discovered a lesion suspected of being cancerous. Although she was expected to return to prison after her medical leave, she remained on furlough until her re-arrest this week.

Despite the ongoing pressure, Mohammadi continued to speak out publicly during her temporary release, drawing renewed attention to Iran’s human rights record.

Just days before her arrest, Mohammadi authored an essay for Time magazine, arguing that true peace is unattainable in Iran under pervasive state control. “Iranians live under constant surveillance, censorship, arbitrary detention, and the ever-present threat of violence,” she wrote, calling for global support for Iran’s civil society, independent journalism, women’s rights activists, and human rights defenders.

In a December 2024 interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, Mohammadi remained resolute. “Whether I am inside Evin prison or outside, my objective is unchanged,” she stated. “Until democracy is achieved, we will not stop.”

During her years in prison, Mohammadi has repeatedly reported mistreatment and abuse of detained women, including prolonged solitary confinement and sexual violence. In letters and interviews, she has described assaults allegedly carried out by security forces, prison officials, and medical staff. Iranian authorities have consistently denied these allegations, dismissing them as false.

The Narges Foundation indicated that several other activists were also arrested during the memorial service in Mashhad, although details regarding these detentions remain limited. The foundation has called for the immediate release of all individuals detained while paying respects to the late lawyer.

Mohammadi is the mother of teenage twins, Kiana and Ali Rahmani, who accepted the Nobel Peace Prize on her behalf in Oslo. Her husband, Taghi Rahmani—himself a former political prisoner—has long described her as possessing “limitless energy” in the pursuit of freedom.

Speaking previously to CNN, her son Ali expressed pride in his mother despite the personal sacrifices involved. “I have accepted this life,” he said. “Any suffering I endure does not matter.”

As the international community rallies for her release, the situation underscores the ongoing struggle for human rights and freedom of expression in Iran, a fight that Mohammadi has championed for years.

According to The Guardian, the global outcry surrounding Mohammadi’s detention reflects a growing concern over Iran’s treatment of dissenters and the state of human rights in the country.

Year-End Obamacare Challenges Highlight Political Failures in Washington

As Congress heads into the holiday recess, millions of Americans face a potential healthcare crisis due to political gridlock over Affordable Care Act subsidies.

Millions of Americans are once again paying the price for Washington’s dysfunction. As Congress prepares to adjourn for the holidays, lawmakers appear set to leave without resolving a looming healthcare crisis that could cause Affordable Care Act (ACA) premiums to double or worse for millions of families in the coming year. For households already stretched thin, the result will be painful choices—cutting essentials, taking on debt, or dropping health insurance entirely.

With enhanced Covid-era ACA subsidies scheduled to expire on December 31, political paralysis has taken center stage. What unfolded this week was a familiar spectacle of finger-pointing, stalled legislation, and a notable absence of urgency—while the president showed little engagement as the clock ran down.

At the heart of the crisis is a widening partisan divide. Republicans, long hostile to Obamacare, say they want to rein in costs and reduce insurer profits. Democrats insist on extending subsidies but largely refuse to discuss reforms to the law itself.

This impasse played out in the Senate, where two competing bills were brought to the floor despite near-universal recognition that neither would pass. Republicans proposed redirecting subsidies into health savings accounts (HSAs) for some ACA enrollees over two years, a plan backed rhetorically by Donald Trump. Critics argue the approach offers no guarantee that patients could cover full medical costs—particularly in emergencies—leaving families exposed to large bills.

Democrats countered with a proposal to extend the enhanced subsidies for three more years, preserving $0 or near-$0 premiums for many low-income Americans and continuing expanded eligibility for middle-class families. Four Republicans crossed party lines, but the bill fell short of the 60 votes needed to advance.

The stakes extend far beyond Obamacare exchanges. Healthcare costs are climbing across the board, affecting Americans with employer-sponsored coverage as well. This broader affordability crisis is shaping the political landscape ahead of next year’s midterm elections.

The GOP’s razor-thin House majority further complicates matters, making it difficult to pass legislation on virtually any issue. Democrats, for their part, are reluctant to reopen the ACA for reforms, viewing it as the crown jewel of former President Barack Obama’s legacy. Republicans, meanwhile, fear primary challenges if they are seen as “saving” Obamacare.

Yet political reality cuts both ways: millions of Republican voters rely on ACA coverage. Failure to act would directly harm their own base—particularly in swing states, where moderate GOP lawmakers are increasingly alarmed.

Some lawmakers argue that heated rhetoric may eventually create space for compromise. Several proposals are still circulating, including a bipartisan plan from Senators Susan Collins and Bernie Moreno that would extend subsidies for two years while closing income loopholes and requiring modest premium contributions.

Ohio Senator Jon Husted said Congress must act quickly, citing constituents facing soaring premiums. “I don’t want people to suffer,” he said, while also criticizing what he described as systemic fraud within the ACA.

Democrats remain skeptical, viewing Republican reform efforts as thinly veiled attempts to weaken or dismantle Obamacare—a suspicion rooted in years of failed repeal efforts. Still, Democrats are not without blame. Critics note they could have made the subsidies permanent when they previously controlled both Congress and the White House.

Attention now turns to House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has promised a forthcoming plan to reduce premiums “for all Americans.” However, deep divisions within his party threaten to derail any proposal. Conservative lawmakers reject subsidy extensions outright, while moderates warn there is no time to design a new healthcare framework before the deadline.

One last-ditch option involves discharge petitions, which would allow rank-and-file lawmakers to force a vote over leadership objections. Representative Mike Lawler of New York urged Democratic leaders to cooperate, warning that delay would deepen public frustration.

“This is a moment to show the American people that Washington can function,” Lawler said.

Whether Congress rises to that challenge remains uncertain. What is clear is that millions of Americans’ healthcare security now hangs in the balance—a stark reminder of how political stalemate can quickly become a personal crisis, according to Global Net News.

Diwali Celebrated at Consulates in Houston and Atlanta Following UNESCO Inclusion

Diwali’s recent inclusion in UNESCO’s Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity was celebrated with vibrant events at Indian consulates in Houston and Atlanta.

HOUSTON, TX – The Consulate General of India in Houston hosted a lively event to commemorate Diwali’s inclusion in UNESCO’s Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. This recognition highlights the festival’s global significance and its universal messages of light, harmony, and goodwill.

During the celebration, Indian Consul General D.C. Manjunath emphasized the importance of this acknowledgment, noting how Diwali transcends cultural boundaries and resonates with people around the world.

In Atlanta, the Indian Consulate also marked the occasion with a beautiful display of diyas, traditional oil lamps, illuminating the consulate in tribute to the festival and its newfound recognition.

The inclusion of Diwali was part of a broader review by UNESCO, which examined a total of 67 nominations from nearly 80 countries during a week-long session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. This session took place at Delhi’s Red Fort, beginning on December 8.

Celebrations were not limited to Houston and Atlanta; Indian diplomatic missions across the globe joined in honoring the recognition of Diwali, one of India’s most cherished cultural and spiritual festivals. The global acknowledgment of Diwali underscores its significance as a festival of light and joy, celebrated by millions around the world.

According to IANS, the recognition serves as a reminder of the rich cultural heritage that Diwali represents and its ability to foster unity and peace among diverse communities.

Major Measles Outbreak Results in Hundreds Quarantined in U.S. County

South Carolina is experiencing a significant measles outbreak, with 111 confirmed cases and hundreds quarantined as health officials emphasize the importance of vaccination to curb the spread.

A major measles outbreak in South Carolina has led to the quarantine of hundreds of residents in Spartanburg County. The South Carolina Department of Health (DPH) reported on Wednesday that the outbreak has resulted in 111 confirmed cases since it was first identified on October 2.

As part of the containment efforts, 254 individuals are currently in quarantine, while 16 others are in isolation to prevent further transmission of the virus. “This significant jump in cases is unfortunate,” a DPH spokesperson remarked during the media briefing.

Public exposure to the virus has been noted at Inman Intermediate School, where 43 students are now in quarantine. Additionally, eight other intermediate and middle schools in the area are also implementing quarantine measures. The DPH indicated that some students have had to quarantine multiple times due to repeated exposure.

Health officials continue to stress that vaccination is the most effective way to prevent the disruption caused by measles in education, employment, and community life. Out of the 111 confirmed cases, a staggering 105 individuals were unvaccinated. The DPH spokesperson highlighted that receiving a vaccination within 72 hours of exposure can prevent the onset of measles infection.

Some of the cases in Spartanburg County are linked to travel exposure, while others remain of unknown origin, suggesting that the virus is circulating within the community.

In a related development, Connecticut has reported its first measles case in four years. The Connecticut Department of Public Health confirmed on Thursday that an unvaccinated child under the age of 10 in Fairfield County was diagnosed with measles after returning from international travel. The child exhibited symptoms several days later, including a runny nose, cough, congestion, fever, and a rash that began on the head and spread across the body.

The Connecticut DPH emphasized that measles is “highly contagious” and can spread rapidly through the air via coughing or sneezing. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately nine out of ten unvaccinated individuals who come into contact with an infected person will contract the virus.

Furthermore, the International Vaccine Access Center has reported that more than 1,800 cases of measles were documented in 2025, marking the highest number since the U.S. declared the virus eliminated in 2000. This figure represents the most cases recorded in three decades.

DPH Commissioner Manisha Juthani, M.D., underscored the importance of vaccination in a recent statement, saying, “The single best way to protect your children and yourself from measles is to be vaccinated. One dose of measles vaccine is about 93% effective, while two doses are about 97% effective.”

As the outbreak continues, health officials are urging residents to ensure they are vaccinated to protect themselves and their communities from the ongoing threat of measles.

For more information on the outbreak and vaccination, residents are encouraged to consult the South Carolina Department of Health and other health resources.

According to Fox News, the situation remains fluid, and ongoing monitoring is essential to control the spread of this highly contagious virus.

-+=