Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath emerged as the star campaigners for the BJP-led alliance in Maharashtra. Complementing their efforts, Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde’s “Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin Yojana,” launched in June, played a significant role in securing a landslide victory for the ruling coalition. This three-party alliance, also known as the Mahayuti, drew immense support from women voters who turned out in large numbers, shaping the outcome decisively.
This triumph in Maharashtra follows closely after the BJP’s success in the Haryana Assembly elections, acting as a major morale booster for the party’s cadre. The BJP’s performance in the Lok Sabha elections earlier had left the party somewhat dispirited due to its failure to secure an outright majority. However, this sweeping win has revived enthusiasm and reaffirmed Amit Shah’s reputation as a “modern-day Chanakya and master strategist.”
The BJP is poised to secure over 125 seats in Maharashtra, making it the largest party within the Mahayuti alliance. Meanwhile, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena is expected to win more than 50 seats, with the Ajit Pawar faction of the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) also performing remarkably well. In stark contrast, the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA), comprising the Congress, Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena, and Sharad Pawar-led NCP, has suffered a significant defeat. This poor performance raises doubts about whether any of its constituents can even stake a claim for the Leader of the Opposition position in the state Assembly.
Eknath Shinde’s supporters have already begun portraying him as the inheritor of Bal Thackeray’s legacy, claiming the election results reflect this shift. However, for NCP veteran Sharad Pawar, the elections have been a decisive blow. His nephew, Ajit Pawar, has emerged as the stronger leader within the NCP, potentially signaling the end of Sharad Pawar’s political dominance.
Despite the Mahayuti’s victory, uncertainty looms over who will assume the chief minister’s position in Maharashtra. While Eknath Shinde currently holds the office, speculation is rife about whether BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis, who was instrumental in the party’s resounding success, will reclaim the role. The choice of chief minister is now the “million-dollar question” in the state’s political landscape.
In contrast to the BJP’s success in Maharashtra, the party faced significant setbacks in Jharkhand. The BJP attempted to intensify its campaign around the issue of Bangladeshi infiltration but underperformed in the elections. Additionally, divisive and inflammatory speeches targeting minority communities, particularly by Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, seem to have backfired, costing the party valuable support.
In Jharkhand, the Adivasi population once again expressed strong confidence in the leadership of Chief Minister Hemant Soren. Soren accused the central government of attempting to jail him on fabricated charges, a narrative that resonated with voters. His government’s welfare initiatives, such as the Maiya Samman Yojana and the Sarvajan Pension Yojana, contributed significantly to his electoral success.
One of the central issues in the Jharkhand elections was Soren’s arrest in January over an alleged land scam. This controversy became a focal point of the INDIA bloc’s campaign, enabling them to connect with voters effectively. The election results underscore the impact of these accusations and the resulting solidarity among his supporters.
Maharashtra’s decisive victory has rejuvenated the BJP, while the challenges in Jharkhand reflect areas requiring strategic reassessment. The contrasting outcomes highlight the complexities of Indian electoral politics and the nuanced approach required to appeal to diverse voter bases.