Up to 87 Percent Migrants could stay in US: Study

Up to 87 percent of undocumented immigrants would be able to remain in the US if the executive action measures on immigration taken by President Barack Obama are implemented without modifications, according to a study. The report published by the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) on Thursday said that the net effect of the new policies will see a reduction in deportations from the US.

The MPI study says that the Department of Homeland Security will focus on deporting immigrants who are considered to be a public threat, who have been convicted of serious crimes, who have violated deportation orders or have recently entered the country.

The authors of the report estimate that about 13 percent of the 11 million undocumented foreigners living in the US, or some 1.4 million people, will fall within these categories, making them the priority targets for deportations after the new regulations come into effect.

In 2012, the US government launched the deferred action programme that gave immigrants who have grown up in this country permission to stay here and work, and that measure was broadened last February to include a larger number of young people, as well as the parents of children born in this country.

These two expansions of the programme are currently on hold by order of a federal judge in Texas due to a lawsuit presented by more than two dozen states and the resolution of the matter in an appeals court is being awaited.

In all, 5.2 million immigrants would benefit from these immigration relief measures, but the MPI said that the implementation of new guidelines for law enforcement and immigration authorities would broaden the number of people who would benefit to 9.6 million. It could bring the number of annual expulsions down to historic minimums. According to the MPI, deportations would be reduced by 25,000 each year, falling under 100,000. A record number of people were deported in 2011, with 180,000 immigrants, who had committed crimes, being expelled.

US has 450,000 Illegal Immigrants from India

While there are as many as 11.2 million illegal immigrants in the US, a new report said about 450,000 of them are from India. The South Asian nation is the fourth top source country of unauthorised immigrants after top-ranked Mexico, according to the report based on the 2012 census, released by the Pew Research Centre, a Washington think tank.

Ranking second, with considerably fewer unauthorised immigrants than Mexico, is El Salvador (675,000 in 2012). It is followed by Guatemala (525,000), India (450,000), Honduras (350,000), China (300,000) and the Philippines (200,000). Republican leaders, who will control both houses of Congress next year as a result of the November elections, have warned Obama that any executive action would torpedo the chances for a bipartisan immigration reform bill.

Among the groups widely thought to be under consideration for relief from deportation are long-time US residents with US-born children, the report noted. Mexicans are the largest national origin group in 36 of America’s 50 states. Mexicans are not the largest group in three New England states, the area around the nation’s capital as well as Alaska, Hawaii and Louisiana.

India is the largest birth country of unauthorised immigrants in New Hampshire, the report said.

New Jersey had the biggest gain in between 2009 and 2012, jumping 75,000 to 525,000 as many immigrants from India and Ecuador crossed illegally into the state. It was followed by Florida, increasing 50,000 to 925,000. Pennsylvania was third, rising 30,000 to 170,000.

It saw increases from several regions including Honduras, India and the Dominican Republic.

The number of unauthorised immigrants in the US has remained unchanged around 11.2 million since 2009 after decades of rapid growth, the report noted.

But there have been shifts in the states where unauthorised immigrants live and the countries where they were born.

Unauthorised immigrants currently make up 3.5 percent of the nation’s population of 316 million, the report said. Preliminary estimates show the unauthorised population was 11.3 million in 2013. The number of unauthorised immigrants peaked in 2007 at 12.2 million, when this group was four percent of the US population.

Bill Seeks to Reform H-1B Visas After Finding Abuse of Program

Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Dick Durbin, D-Ill., assistant Democratic leader, have introduced a bipartisan legislation in the Senate seeking reform of the H-1B visa program and to modify wage requirements. It is cosponsored by Senators Bill Nelson, Richard Blumenthal and Sherrod Brown. It explicitly prohibits the replacement of American workers by H-1B or L-1 visa holders.

“The H-1B visa program was never meant to replace qualified American workers, but it was instead intended as a means to fill gaps in highly-specialized areas of employment that cannot be filled by Americans,” Grassley said. “The abuse of the system is real, and media reports are validating what we have argued against for years, including the fact that Americans are training their replacements.”

There is a sense of urgency for Americans who are losing their jobs to lesser-skilled workers who are coming in at lower wages on a visa program that has gotten away from its original intent, he said. “Reform of the H-1B visa program must be a priority,” Grassley stressed.

The bill would prohibit companies from hiring H-1B employees if they employ more than 50 people and more than 50 percent of their employees are H-1B and L-1 visa holders.

This provision would crack down on outsourcing companies that import large numbers of H-1B and L-1 workers for short training periods and then send those same workers back to their home country to do the work of Americans, the senators said.

“For years, foreign outsourcing companies have used loopholes in the laws to displace qualified American workers and facilitate the outsourcing of American jobs,” Durbin said. “The H-1B and L-1 Visa Reform Act would end these abuses and protect American and foreign workers from exploitation.”

The bill would also give the Department of Labor enhanced authority to review, investigate and audit employer compliance, as well as to penalize fraudulent or abusive conduct. The bill says that working conditions of similarly-employed American workers may not be adversely affected by the hiring of the H-1B worker, including those who have been placed by another employer at the American worker’s worksite. Many companies hire workers from India on H-1B visas.

The Grassley-Durbin reform bill will, for the first time, prioritize the annual allocation of H-1B visas. In addition, the bill includes the establishment of a wage floor for L-1 workers; authority for the Department of Homeland Security to investigate, audit and enforce compliance with L-1 program requirements; assurance that intra-company transfers occur between legitimate branches of a company and don’t involve “shell” facilities; and a change to the definition of “specialized knowledge” to ensure that L-1 visas are reserved only for truly key personnel.

GOPIO-New York Discusses NRI Property Issues and Protecting Assets in India During Seminar at Kerala Center

Increased international mobility of both capital and labor in recent years has forced advanced countries to examine their fiscal policies from international perspective. In this age of globalization, cross-border matters have become of great concern to individuals. Citizen of other countries, at times, move to the USA or own assets here, and U.S. Citizens often move or own assets outside the United States.

The Global organization of People of Indian Origin – New York chapter organized a community meeting where many issues of NRIs buying, selling and owning properties in India were discussed. It was jointly organized by the Indian American Kerala Center at its auditorium in Elmont, New York. The speakers were New York Attorney Anand Ahuja who is also the President of GOPIO-New York and Mr. Pambayan Meyyan, Senior Vice President of Forest Hills Financial Group. The meeting was chaired by GOPIO Founder President Dr. Thomas Abraham.

“Indian Americans, as an immigrant community to the USA, are greatly affected with this spur in globalization as most still own vast assets, particularly real estate back home in India,” said Attorney Anand Ahuja.  “As with owning assets outside USA, the Indian American community is at greater risks, therefore, any sale-purchase of real estate in India, estate, gift or tax planning should be considered from international perspective than just domestically,” Attorney Ahuja continued.

“This is a great opportunity to discuss these issues in a community forum and develop strategies for a community compaign and reach out to the Govt. of India and the state governments on NRI property issues back home,” said Dr. Abraham

Several issues were brought out at this meeting especially buying, selling and owning real estate properties by NRIs/PIOs in India. It was pointed out that there have been growing number of scams against NRIs/PIOs hereditary, residential and commercial properties and due to these reasons, NRIs/PIOs are being greatly discouraged to invest in India

“NRIs/PIOs are at a great disadvantage to contest property issues in courts in India due to the length of the time (10-20 years) it takes, and/or due to the fact that in both civil and criminal cases NRIs/PIOs need to be present on many occasions before the court,” said Dr. Abraham. The meeting requested GOPIO to take up this issue with Govt. of India to have Fast Tack Courts.

The meeting also called upon the Government of India to enact another legislation to provide Title Insurance to ensure that their ownership in real estate is protected against forged signatures on the deed and for any such fraudulent transfer of their properties.

It was also pointed out that NRIs and PIOs are subjected to higher TDS (tax deducted at source) than resident Indians for capital gains and while selling properties. GOPIIO meeting passed a resolution covering all these issues and plans to present it at the Regional Pravasi Bharatiya Divas to be held in Los Angeles on November 15th.

In a resolution passed at the end of the day, GOPIO urged the Government of India to enact legislation to designate Fast Track Courts for NRIs/PIOs for the speedy settlement of their property issues in India, and enact another legislation to provide Title Insurance to ensure that their ownership in real estate is protected against forged signatures on the deed and for any such fraudulent transfer of their properties.

GOPIO-New York Discusses NRI Property Issues and Protecting Assets in India During Seminar at Kerala Center
Speakers, organizers and some participants at the recently held community meeting on NRI Property Issues in India. Seated in front row from L. to R.: Kerala Center President Thambi Thalappillil, GOPIO Founder President Dr. Thomas Abraham, GOPIO-New York President and panelist Anand Ahuja, Panelist Pambayan Meyyan, GOPIO-New York Founder President Lal Motwani and Kerala Center Executive Director E.M. Stephen

 

India Changes Its Earlier Version On :Visa-On-Arrival

Washington, DC: If you ever thought that you could go to India and seek a visa at the airport to be a tourist in India, you may be in for a shocking surprise. Addressing “misunderstandings” over its Visa on Arrival scheme, the government of India has renamed the tourism initiative “Visa Online.”

The visa on arrival was intended to be sought and obtained upon arrival at select international airports in India. However, the government seems to have wrongly coined the term, as per reports here. The Visa on Arrival scheme allows visitors from about 44 countries to apply for a visa four days before the date of arrival. Because of its name, however, international visitors were given to misunderstand the scheme and assumed that they would receive their visas on landing in India, officials said. Since they hadn’t applied in advance, they had to return home.

India Changes Its Earlier Version On :Visa-On-ArrivalFewer travelers to India were expected to have used the visa outsourcing service of Cox and Kings Global Services following a new initiative launched in November that guarantees a 30-day visa on arrival to visitors from the U.S. and 43 other countries.

The Indian Ministry of External Affairs announced the “Tourist Visa on Arrival enabled with Electronic Travel Authorization” plan Nov. 27, 2014 in New Delhi, noting that the new plan was designed to positively impact India’s economy. K.J. Srinivasa, deputy consul general at the Indian Consulate in San Francisco, told India-West that the new visa application process was designed to ease the bureaucratic process involved in short-term travel to India, adding: “Indian Americans are the target for this scheme, which was designed to promote tourism.”

Mahesh Sharma, Union Minister of Tourism and Culture, in announcing the new initiative, said: “The implementation of TVoA enabled with ETA will send a clear and powerful message that India is serious in making travel to the country easy.” Speaking to reporters at the launch, the minister noted that India has a unique advantage in the tourism sector, owing to its geographical location. He also assured that his ministry would ensure a safe and secure environment for visiting foreign tourists.

Forgoing the often-cumbersome process of applying for a visa through Cox and Kings Global Services, the Indian Embassy’s visa outsourcing service in the U.S., tourists and “casual business” travelers to India can apply online for a 30-day visa.

India Changes Its Earlier Version On :Visa-On-ArrivalThe Tourism Ministry approached the Home Ministry and asked for the name change to end the confusion. “There is a question about the terminology on whether it is e-visa or visa on arrival. I think this issue should be addressed in a different manner. “We declared it as Visa on Arrival. (But) basically it is Electronic Travel Authorization,” Union Tourism Minister Mahesh Sharma told reporters on the sidelines of the launch of “Visit Kerala 2015.”

Tourism Secretary Lalit K. Panwar said: “Now, we will be calling it as Visa Online. If you call Visa Online, there will be no confusion because you will get visa online in your inbox. So, we can call it as Visa Online,”

Prospective tourists must apply at least four days before the visit to India, and submit a $60 fee. The process also requires the applicant to scan his/her passport and submit it through the Web site as well as uploading a photo. An “electronic travel authorization” is then sent to the traveler’s e-mail address, which must be printed out and carried.

The ETA can only be used at nine airports in India: Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Thiruvananthapuram, Kochi and Goa. It is valid for 30 days after the date of arrival. The three-page application is located at: indianvisaonline.gov.in/visa/tvoa.html.

One-Third of Hindu Americans Not Married, Says Pew Report

The number of Indian Americans who have never been married has risen sharply, according to the Pew Research Center’s 2014 Religious Landscape Study, which surveyed more than 35,000 Americans.

Nearly one-third of Hindu Americans have never been married.

In 2007, the first year of the study, only 14 percent of Hindu Americans had never been married, while an overwhelming 79 percent were wedded. Currently, 60 percent of Hindu Americans are married. Three percent of Hindus surveyed said that they live with partners, contrasting sharply with 2007 data, which showed no Hindu Americans living with partners.

America’s Hindu population has reached 2.23 million, an increase of about one million or 85.8 percent since 2007, making Hinduism the fourth-largest faith, according to estimates based on the Pew Research Center’s “Religious Landscape Study.” The study only gave the percentage shares of Hindus in the population, rather than numbers, but calculations by IANS using the population proportions in the report and census projections showed that the number of Hindus rose from 1.2 million in 2007 out of a total U.S. population of 301.2 million that year to 2.23 million in 2014 in a population of 318.88 million. This amounts to an increase of 1.03 million or 85.8 percent in the Hindu population during the seven-year period.

In other statistics, 45 percent of Muslim Americans have never been married, according to the study, again contrasting sharply with 2007 rates when 28 percent reported never having been married. Slightly more than one-third of Buddhists have never been married, equivalent to the 2007 rates.

“Since the first Religious Landscape Study was conducted in 2007, the share of Americans who are married has continued to decline, while the share of adults who have never been married has risen sharply,” noted the report.

“In fact, recent analysis of census data shows that the share of Americans who have never been married now stands at an all-time high,” reported the study. In the overall population, about 48 percent of Americans are married, while 25 percent have never been married. About seven percent of the population currently lives with a partner.

Hindu Americans now comprise 0.07 percent of the U.S. population, up from 2007, when 0.04 percent of people surveyed identified as Hindus. Muslims now represent 0.09 percent of the U.S. population, while 0.03 percent identify as Buddhists. A small fraction of the U.S. population identifies with other world religions, including Sikhs, Jains, Zoroastrians, Bahais, Taoists and Rastafarians.

Hindus and Jews have the highest proportion of household incomes; more than 36 percent of Hindu Americans have a family income of more than $100,000. Almost 19 percent of the American population has family incomes over $100,000. Hindus also continue to be the most highly-educated religion: 77 percent are college graduates and 48 percent hold post-graduate degrees.

The number of people who identify as “unaffiliated” has sharply risen to more than 22 percent of Americans, with the trend rising highest among millennials. Mixed race and interfaith marriages are also on the rise.

Hindu Americans comprise the largest population to marry within their own religion.

The Pew Research Center will release more findings over the year.

An earlier report from Pew on the future of world religions in April said that by 2050, Hindus would make up 1.2 percent of the U.S. population and number 4.78 million. This would make the U.S. Hindu population the fifth largest in the world. The rising trend of Hinduism in the U.S. contrasts with that in India. The Pew report released in April said that the share of Hindus in the Indian population was expected to decline by 2.8 percent, from 79.5 percent in 2010 to 76.7 percent in 2050 even though their numbers were projected to grow to almost 1.3 billion by that year in a total Indian population of nearly 1.7 billion.

These are the highlights of the Hindu community profile in the report:  Hindus have the lowest divorce rate of only 5 percent. Hindus are least likely to marry outside their religion: 91 percent have a spouse or partner who is a fellow Hindu. The median age of Hindu adults is 33 years. Five percent of San Francisco’s population is Hindu and three percent of New York City’s. Most Hindus live in the West (38 percent) and the Northeast (33 percent). An anomaly in the report is that 62 percent of Hindus are men and 38 percent women, a difference of 24 percent, which may be due to the pattern of immigration.

The new Pew report this week on the religions in the U.S. said that most of the increase in the Hindu population came through immigration and not conversions: 87 percent are immigrants and nine percent are the children of immigrants, the report said. Only 10 percent of the Hindus are converts, with Catholics and unaffiliated each accounting for 3 percent.

Hindus are least likely to convert to other religions, according to the report: Of all the American adults who said they were raised as Hindus, 80 percent continued to adhere to Hinduism. Of those born Hindu, who did not any longer identify themselves as Hindus, 18 percent said they had no religious affiliation (a category that includes atheists and agnostics), and only one percent joined Christian Protestant sects.

“A Passage To America: Notes Of An Adopted Son” By Joseph Cheruvelil

One day, in 1963, Joseph M Cheruvelil entered a restaurant in Mississippi, along with David Smith (name changed) a White man. They waited for several minutes, but were not served. Finally, David asked the attendant, “Are you blind? Can’t you see us? We are here for food.”

The man did not say anything. However, a few minutes later, his boss came out and said, looking at Joseph, “We cannot serve this ‘boy’.” (In the Mississippi of those times, anyone who was colored was called a boy, whether he was 10 or 50 years old). David said, “Why not?” The owner said, “This is Mississippi. Get the hell out.” David went out and got a hunting gun from his car. Then he walked back in and said, “Give us food or else…..”

“A Passage To America: Notes Of An Adopted Son” By Joseph Cheruvelil
Joseph M Cheruvelil

It was then that Joseph began to feel nervous. “I realized that if he did something drastic, the police would come,” he says, now half a century later, recalling his initial days in the land of opportunities. . “We would have been labelled as ‘Communists’ or ‘trouble makers’. So I ran out.”

David followed, cursed Joseph, and said, “Are you a coward? You don’t want to change society?” Joseph said, “I could have got killed just trying to have some food. I was a young person, and had a life ahead of me. I had to think about my siblings and parents back home in Kerala. I have no regrets about the decision I made.”

This anecdote has been recounted in this eloquently narrated autobiography, “A Passage to America – Notes of an adopted son” by Joseph Cheruvelil. The large volume containing 764 pages, deals with Joseph’s childhood at Kannadi village in Kuttanad, his graduate years at University College in Thiruvananthapuram, his stints of teaching at Christ College, Irinjalakuda, and St. Xavier’s College in Tirunelveli, India. In 1960, he secured a scholarship, came to the United States, and studied  at Loyola University in Chicago, and the University of Mississippi. Thereafter, he became a teacher of English at St. John’s University, New York, for 39 years.

Joseph has aimed the book for a specific audience. “In America, this is for the second-generation immigrants, who do not have a clear picture of India,” he says. “In India, I wanted to give the college-going generation an idea of life in the United States, its history, culture, society, and technology.”

However, as Dr. Joy T. Kunjappu commented rightly, this biography of Joseph is for an international audience.  Many of us who have immigrated from India and from across the world to this land of opportunities will find many parallels and may even easily recognize some diagonals and curves, but its emphasis is universal in nature.   For a generic reader, it’s a free ride and an assisted access into the life of a man who survived, after a long fight against grueling odds and conflicting visions, right from his childhood.  The characteristics of a thinker is to meditate on all the aspects of a problem and accept one’s decision with supporting logistics and calm oneself — man doesn’t live with bread alone!   Often, the strong influence of his upbringing makes him say, “mea culpa” as a litany in Latin — an acknowledgment of one’s own fault or error, as in a Catholic confession.

The idea to write the book was a seed within him for many years. “Whenever I read a good book, I would say to myself, ‘Gee, I should try to write something like this’,” he says. “But my teaching took all of my energy and attention. So when I retired, in 2005, I thought I should write something.”

It took Joseph three-and-a-half years to write the life of story of this “adopted son.” This large volume covers an array of subjects: education, family, children, living within one’s needs, personal finances, politics, leadership, and government spending. “I also wrote about people who feel lost during cultural and economic revolutions, as well as the underdogs, the helpless, and handicapped,” he says.

When he was merited with St. John’s University’s “Outstanding Achievement in Teaching” award, and selected as the Grand Marshall for the 135th Commencement Exercise (p.575), looking with profound internal fulfillment, and facing his wife, Rose; son, Roy; daughter, Sheila; son-in-law, Vijay; and grandson, Seth in the audience, he “… remembered the first time I attended my preschool class, the first time I went to college in Thevara, and the first time I came to St John’s …”

“A Passage To America: Notes Of An Adopted Son” By Joseph CheruvelilA real story of an immigrant. In this large volume one gets to understand the life in India as it has evolved in the past century. The reader is taken through the passage of time as events unfold both here in India and the US. The life of Joseph Cheuvelil is that of millions of immigrants who fought odds and made a name for themselves. Truly inspiring!

Joseph says, “I left as a loyal citizen of India. Then I became a citizen of the US. And recently I became an overseas citizen of India. I am eclectic in taste, a Catholic by religion, and a Hindu by culture.”

USA continues to Welcome Indian American students to US varsities

American universities are enrolling unprecedented numbers of foreign students, prompted by the rise of an affluent class in China and generous scholarships offered by oil-rich Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia. USA continues to be the top destination for students from India who want to pursue higher studies abroad. China and India are sending more immigrants to the U.S. than Mexico, following more than a decade of decreasing immigration from Latin America, according to the latest numbers from the Census Bureau.

The top two suppliers of foreign graduate students for U.S. universities are heading in opposite directions. Over the past 2 years, applications from India have skyrocketed, while those from China have tapered off—leaving analysts scrambling for answers. U.S. universities are enrolling record numbers of foreign students, including many affluent Indian and Chinese. The Census study suggests the “age structure” of inflows of immigrants from India looks roughly the same in the two time periods. In both cases, the flows are concentrated in the 20 to 34 age group, especially people ages 25 to 29, for both men and women. These are potentially young workers starting and building their careers, or postgraduates getting more education—as opposed to older people or college students or teenagers.

According to a report released recently by the Council of Graduate Schools (CGS), a nonprofit based in Washington, D.C., the number of applicants to U.S. graduate schools from India grew by 32% in the past year, following a 22% rise the previous year. The new report also documents a parallel decline in Chinese applications, which fell by 1% this past year and 3% the year before, according to 294 colleges and universities that responded to a CGS survey.

Between these two time periods, 2005-07 and 2011-13, the age groups that saw the largest percentage point increases were 15 to 19 years old and 20 to 24 years old, for both men and women, US Census Bureau said. These ages are roughly around the time people go to college—though, of course, plenty of young Chinese immigrants may not be going to college but may instead be in low-wage jobs or something else. (Note these figures include immigrants from Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan.)

Some of these Indian immigrants are coming on skilled-worker U.S. visas, known as H-1Bs, no doubt, but that’s not the whole story. Demand for such visas among employers has long exceeded each year’s congressionally mandated supply.

Of course, America’s share of immigrants has been growing for some time. In 1970, it was just 4.7%. The latest projections are interesting, however, because they suggest immigrants will eventually exceed even the historically-high levels seen in the late 19thand early 20th century. Roughly 13% of America’s population is foreign-born now, according to the latest, 2013 data—the highest level since the 1920s. But this share is expected to grow to 13.5% in 2015 and then 15.1% in 2025—above a peak of 14.8% in 1890. By 2049, Census projects a little over 18% of the population will be foreign-born. 2060? Nearly 19% (18.8%).

USA continues to Welcome Indian American students to US varsitiesAccording to an analysis by Brookings Institution’s William Frey, between 2015 and 2060, native non-Hispanic whites in the U.S. will decline by 23 million—while the rest of the population (minorities and immigrants) will increase by 118 million. Native non-Hispanic whites will be a minority before 2040, and will be only two-fifths of America’s population in 2060. The share of the foreign-born in the U.S. population is expected to rise substantially in coming decades.

Meanwhile, Britain has been more stringent in offering work visas to graduating students from abroad. Britain’s very own home affairs select committee now wants prime minister David Cameron to review its earlier decision to abolish the post study work visa which allowed international students to work for two years in UK after finishing their education here. In an exclusive interview with the media, the chairman of the highly influential House of Commons committee Keith Vaz said, “Yes, we absolutely should review this policy. When looking at this situation, the home affairs select committee recommended a review of post study work visas to alleviate the clearly negative elements of the current policy”.

Vaz who was recently appointed the vice-chairman of the Labour Party added, “At present, we are seeing an unprecedented decline in the number of Indian students, which is a serious problem for our educational institutions, our economy and for the students themselves, who have been dissuaded from attending some of the most prestigious universities in the world”. According to Vaz, “the best way to establish relations between countries is through young people from India coming to study in the UK”.  He added, “I want them to come and study in London, Leicester and Liverpool”.

This comes a day after Scotland told TOI of its plans to introduce a special visa that will allow Indian students to work in Scotland at least for two years after they finish their education degree there. Post-study work visa was abolished by the UK government in April 2012. This had led to a 50 per cent dip in Indian students visiting British universities for higher education.

International students in UK universities come from over 190 countries. The UK is just below the US in terms of the total number and diversity of international students in its higher education institutions. In total, during the 2013/14 academic year, international students contributed £1,003 million in fee income to London universities.

A recent report said, “We estimate that the direct income from tuition fees contributed £1,317 million to UK GDP; £717 million directly, £183 million via the supply chain and £417 million via the spending of employees. In addition, the £1,003 million in tuition fee income from international students generated a total of 32,800 jobs. We estimate that, in total, friends and relatives that visit international students in London spent £62 million in 2013/14. This spending will contribute £65 million to UK GDP”.

In 2013-14 there were almost 67,500 international students attending London universities – making up 18% of the total student population in the capital, and 22% of the 3,10,000 international students across the UK. The decline in Indian students choosing to study at UK universities has been flagged up as a worrying trend as a new study said that international students coming here contribute nearly 2.3 billion pounds to the British economy every year.

The Effects of Seeing Asian-Americans as a ‘Model Minority’

The New York Times led a discussion last week on the effects of being a model minority on the Asian Americans, who are often categorized as a single group, comprising about 5.4 percent of the U.S. population. But despite economic disparities between nationalities, it is the highest paid racial group, and its members are more likely to be seen as advantaged, than disadvantaged. But is it fair to stereotype Asian-Americans as a “model minority,” free of the burdens of discrimination? Or do they also face obstacles as other nonwhite groups do?

Bernadette Lim, a senior at Harvard University, is the founder and executive director of Women SPEAK and a senior adviser of the Harvard Asian-American Women’s Association, “Arguments of Asian cultural superiority often try to validate the model minority label: The success of Asian-Americans in the United States is “a tribute to hard work, strong families and passion for education.” Positive stereotypes about Asian-Americans are frequently seen as more beneficial than detrimental to the student psyche, in spite of research that these stereotypes harm Asian-American students’ mental health and well-being.”

Karthick Ramakrishnan is a professor of public policy at the University of California, Riverside, and the director of AAPI Data and the National Asian American Survey, pointed out, “For Asian-Americans, these differences in national origin can be quite stark, on aspects ranging from education and income, to health outcomes and language proficiency. For example, Vietnamese-Americans have the lowest level of English proficiency (47 percent), while Filipinos and Indians have the highest (78 percent each). These differences, in turn, can help government agencies and nonprofits determine which groups would need language assistance the most, particularly when accessing health care or finding affordable housing.”

According to Karthick, There are aspects of commonality among them, particularly when it comes to their policy views, as Asian-Americans tend to support higher taxes and more social spending, regardless of national origin. Importantly, however, even this commonality among Asian-Americans cannot simply be assumed; it needs to be proved using evidence that accurately captures the group’s national origin diversity.

The Effects of Seeing Asian-Americans as a ‘Model Minority’A column by Nicholas Kristof published over a week ago in the New York Times began with what the writer calls, “Why are Asian Americans so successful in America?” The column cited psychology and sociology research noting that while Asian immigrants are “disproportionately doctors, research scientists and other highly educated professionals” and their children have in turn achieved academic success, there is no evidence to show that Asian Americans are inherently smarter than other racial groups. Kristof instead credited their success to “East Asia’s long Confucian emphasis on education,” familial sacrifices and positive stereotypes.

The Washington Post followed up the discussion. “While many Asian American commenters said they appreciated Kristof’s attempt to clarify his points, the post likely befuddled others. What could be objectionable, after all, about a column representing as fact the achievements of Asian immigrants in America? But to many Asian Americans, the column’s opening gambit isn’t just awkward. It’s offensive — and dangerous,” The Post commented.

“Angry!” one tweet said. “What a way to wake up. Thanks @NickKristof for feeling the need to perpetuate a sustained, damaging myth.” “Someone pls make Nicholas Kristof’s hack race analysis go away,” read another from Vulture editor E. Alex Jung.

According to Washington Post, “While Kristof’s intent with the column was to confront past responses from readers who had pointed to the Asian American community as proof that “white privilege” doesn’t exist, many felt that he has done so by perpetuating a harmful, decades-old “model minority” myth about the supposedly universally accepted notion that all Asian Americans are successful.”

Asian Immigrant Population to Be Largest in U.S. by 2055: Study

A recent Pew Research Center study has predicted that Asian immigrants will surpass those of Hispanics by the year 2055 in the United States. The study, published Sept. 28, said that immigration in the U.S. has increased from 9.6 million in 1965 to 45 million this year. And by 2065, researchers said there will be roughly 78 million immigrants throughout the nation.

In the 50 years since 1965, America’s population growth was heavily weighted by new immigrants coming over with their children and grandchildren to the tune of 55 percent. In turn, the nation’s demographics have shifted.

In 1965, 84 percent of Americans were non-Hispanic white people. But by 2015, non-Hispanic white people accounted for 62 percent of the population. The Hispanic population in the nation, over that same time span, has grown from 4 percent to 18 percent. Likewise, the Asian population grew from 1 percent in 1965 to 6 percent this year.

The data reflects the change resulting from the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 when the U.S. swept away a national origins quota system that favored immigrants from Europe. It changed its focus to family reunification and skilled immigrants.

Pew’s researchers have determined that there will be another shift coming, but within the immigration population. While Hispanics have accounted for the largest percentage of the population among U.S. immigrants since the 1965 act, Asians will slowly overtake the lead in that category in the next 40 years. Currently 47 percent of immigrants are of Hispanic descent. Asian immigrants, which include Pacific Islanders, account for 26 percent in 2015.

While Hispanics will have a larger population for the considerable future, by 2055, researchers said, Asian immigrants will leapfrog Hispanics as the largest immigrant population in the U.S., at 36 percent to 34 percent. That percentage gap will grow by 2065 to a 7 percent margin with Asian immigrants totaling 38 percent of the population to Hispanics’ 31 percent.

In total population, Asians will account for 14 percent of America’s total population – those born in the U.S. and abroad – by 2065, up from the 6 percent in 2015. Meanwhile, by 2055, no racial or ethnic group will constitute a majority of the population. The non-Hispanic whites’ population in the country will be less than 50 percent by 2055 and is projected to be 46 percent by 2065.

Remembering a Milestone for Immigrants and America

Let’s pause a moment to thank an under-appreciated Congress for one of its great accomplishments: the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which turned 50 on Saturday. The law ended the era of race-based immigration, a quota system based on national origin that overwhelmingly favored white European immigrants.

If you have ever wondered how and why this country had to stop looking at itself as the America of the Disney movies of the mid-1960s — the ones with Fred MacMurray and Keenan Wynn, where everyone seemed to be white and Midwestern and the men wore bowties to supper — you can look to the 1965 law, also known as the Hart-Celler Act, which greatly widened the gateway to immigrants from Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Middle East, among other places.

The White House was host to a citizenship ceremony today to celebrate Hart-Celler. The speakers included the historian Taylor Branch, who quoted President Johnson’s stirring words at the signing ceremony at the foot of the Statue of Liberty. The bill, Johnson said, corrected the “harsh injustice” of national-origins quotas, erasing “a cruel and enduring wrong in the conduct of the American nation.”

Mr. Branch said he counted himself among the historians who view Hart-Celler as “a third pillar of democratic fulfillment from the Civil Rights era, along with the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.”

He placed the bill on a long, slow timeline of American course-correction and self-improvement, a step forward for a country that had learned to turn away from white supremacy, the ownership of human beings and the subjugation of women and was now confronting the many varieties of legal and institutional discrimination and forced inequality.

Hart-Celler affirmed, Mr. Branch said, “that the United States is founded not on any language or ethnic identity,” but rather on the idealism embodied in its founding document’s first three words: “We the people.”

Speaking to the 15 newly sworn citizens in the room, Branch said, “You are a testament to that ideal.” He noted that the bill gets little attention, is misunderstood by many and scorned by some. “There is no Martin Luther King of immigration reform,” he said, “nor any landmark anniversary on par with Selma and the March on Washington.”

But you could say Hart-Celler’s landmark anniversary is the one held in the heart of every immigrant on the day he or she takes the naturalization oath, rejecting old allegiances and joining the citizenry, full-fledged and proud.

Modern Immigration Wave Brings 59 Million to U.S.

The United States has long been—and continues to be—a key destination for the world’s immigrants. Over the decades, immigrants from different parts of the world arrived in the U.S. and settled in different states and cities. This led to the rise of immigrant communities in many parts of the U.S.

The nation’s first great influx of immigrants came from Northern and Western Europe. In 1850, the Irish were the largest immigrant group nationally and in most East Coast and Southern states. By the 1880s, Germans were the nation’s largest immigrant group in many Midwestern and Southern states. At the same time, changes to U.S. immigration policy had a great impact on the source countries of immigrants. In 1880, Chinese immigrants were the largest foreign-born group in California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Nevada. But with the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, Chinese immigrants were prevented from entering the U.S. As a result, other immigrant groups rose to become the largest in those states.

Fifty years after passage of the landmark law that rewrote U.S. immigration policy, nearly 59 million immigrants have arrived in the United States, pushing the country’s foreign-born share to a near record 14%. For the past half-century, these modern-era immigrants and their descendants have accounted for just over half the nation’s population growth and have reshaped its racial and ethnic composition.

Looking ahead, new Pew Research Center U.S. population projections show that if current demographic trends continue, future immigrants and their descendants will be an even bigger source of population growth. Between 2015 and 2065, they are projected to account for 88% of the U.S. population increase, or 103 million people, as the nation grows to 441 million.

These are some key findings of a new Pew Research analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data and new Pew Research U.S. population projections through 2065, which provide a 100-year look at immigration’s impact on population growth and on racial and ethnic change. In addition, this report uses newly released Pew Research survey data to examine U.S. public attitudes toward immigration, and it employs census data to analyze changes in the characteristics of recently arrived immigrants and paint a statistical portrait of the historical and 2013 foreign-born populations.

Immigration since 1965 has swelled the nation’s foreign-born population from 9.6 million then to a record 45 million in 2015. The current immigrant population is lower than the 59 million total who arrived since 1965 because of deaths and departures from the U.S. By 2065, the U.S. will have 78 million immigrants, according to the new Pew Research population projections.

The nation’s immigrant population increased sharply from 1970 to 2000, though the rate of growth has slowed since then. Still, the U.S. has—by far—the world’s largest immigrant population, holding about one-in-five of the world’s immigrants.

Between 1965 and 2015, new immigrants, their children and their grandchildren accounted for 55% of U.S. population growth. They added 72 million people to the nation’s population as it grew from 193 million in 1965 to 324 million in 2015.

This fast-growing immigrant population also has driven the share of the U.S. population that is foreign born from 5% in 1965 to 14% today and will push it to a projected record 18% in 2065. Already, today’s 14% foreign-born share is a near historic record for the U.S., just slightly below the 15% levels seen shortly after the turn of the 20th century. The combined population share of immigrants and their U.S.-born children, 26% today, is projected to rise to 36% in 2065, at least equaling previous peak levels at the turn of the 20th century.

The 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act made significant changes to U.S. immigration policy by sweeping away a long-standing national origins quota system that favored immigrants from Europe and replacing it with one that emphasized family reunification and skilled immigrants. At the time, relatively few anticipated the size or demographic impact of the post-1965 immigration flow. In absolute numbers, the roughly 59 million immigrants who arrived in the U.S. between 1965 and 2015 exceed those who arrived in the great waves of European-dominated immigration during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Between 1840 and 1889, 14.3 million immigrants came to the U.S., and between 1890 and 1919, an additional 18.2 million arrived.

After the replacement of the nation’s European-focused origin quota system, greater numbers of immigrants from other parts of the world began to come to the U.S. Among immigrants who have arrived since 1965, half (51%) are from Latin America and one-quarter are from Asia. By comparison, both of the U.S. immigration waves in the mid-19th century and early 20th century consisted almost entirely of European immigrants.

As a result of its changed makeup and rapid growth, new immigration since 1965 has altered the nation’s racial and ethnic composition. In 1965, 84% of Americans were non-Hispanic whites. By 2015, that share had declined to 62%. Meanwhile, the Hispanic share of the U.S. population rose from 4% in 1965 to 18% in 2015. Asians also saw their share rise, from less than 1% in 1965 to 6% in 2015.

The Pew Research analysis shows that without any post-1965 immigration, the nation’s racial and ethnic composition would be very different today: 75% white, 14% black, 8% Hispanic and less than 1% Asian. The arrival of so many immigrants slightly reduced the nation’s median age, the age at which half the population is older and half is younger. The U.S. population’s median age in 1965 was 28 years, rising to 38 years in 2015 and a projected 42 years in 2065. Without immigration since 1965, the nation’s median age would have been slightly older—41 years in 2015; without immigration from 2015 to 2065, it would be a projected 45 years.

By the early 20th century, a new wave of immigration was underway, with a majority coming from Southern Europe and Eastern Europe. By the 1930s, Italians were the largest immigrant group in the nation and in nine states, including New York, Louisiana, New Jersey and Nevada.

The composition of immigrants changed again in the post-1965 immigration era. By the 1980s, Mexicans became the nation’s largest immigrant group; by 2013, they were the largest immigrant group in 33 states. But other immigrant groups are represented as well. Chinese immigrants are the largest immigrant group in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. Indians are the largest immigrant group in New Jersey. Filipinos are the largest immigrant group in Alaska and Hawaii.

Cox & Kings Global Services Completes 30 Visa Camps

Cox & Kings Global Services in association with the Federation of Indian Associations of the Tristate of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut announced Sept. 21 the successful completion of 30 visa camps across 20 locations in the United States with over 5,000 applications processed, a press release reported. These camps have facilitated the visa, overseas citizenship of India and renunciation servicing of thousands of applicants over a period of six months.

The visa camps began Feb. 28 in Iselin, N.J., and concluded in the San Francisco Bay Area Sept. 12. Over 5,000 applicants were serviced and advised about their documentation, enabling them to complete their applications with CKGS.

“The primary aim behind setting up the visa camps across various locations was to bring in an element of convenience to those who wish to travel to India from the United States,” said Kiran Nambiar, vice president and country manager of CKGS.

With support from the Embassy of India, Washington D.C. and the Consulate General of India in New York, Chicago, Houston, San Francisco and Atlanta, CKGS was able to clear the backlogs of incomplete and pending visa and OCI applications, said Ankur Vaidya, FIA president, in a press release.

“The visa camps have played a critical role in bringing the community closer to the Indian Consulate. The outreach efforts mean that consular services are a pleasant experience now,” said Dnyaneshwar Mulay, Consul General of India, New York.

Many patrons of the visa camps provided overwhelmingly positive feedback on CKGS’ services, citing it as the most seamless experience they have ever had with an Indian consulate, according to a press release. “This type of consular services camp is very beneficial to the Indian community. No hassle and no headache. The staff was very much helpful every which way,” N. Baffana, a patron of one of the visa camps, was quoted as saying in a press release.

U.S. Congress Lets ‘Discriminatory’ Outsourcing H-1B Fee Lapse

Indian companies and high-skilled Indian American workers have been a major force that utilizes the much sought-after H-1B worker visa in the United States. The “discriminatory fee on processing the visa application has been a bone of contention between the US and the many companies that use the visa for its employees, who get to fill the vacuum in the US economy. Passed on August 10, the law contains provision to hike H-1B and L-1 Visa fee per application by USD 2,000 and USD 2,250 respectively for qualifying firm; which mainly targeted Indian IT companies.

In a breather for Indian IT firms, the “discriminatory” USD 2,000 H-1B fee mostly imposed on them has now lapsed in a Republican-majority U.S. Congress.  The charges, often called outsourcing fee, had forced Indian IT companies in the last few years to pay millions of dollars towards protecting the U.S.-Mexican border from illegal immigration.

Indian firms had described the fee on highly-qualified IT professionals coming to the U.S. on a H-1B visa as “discriminatory.”  The legislation with regard to a USD 2,000 fee on H-1B visas for companies having more than 50 per cent of its employees oversees was adopted by the US Congress in 2010 mainly at the instance of a group of lawmakers led by Senator Charles Schumer.

The duration of law was extended from four to five years under James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010 to provide healthcare and financial compensation for the firefighters and other ‘First Responders’ who helped out in the aftermath of the 9/11 attack.

In a report released last month, NASSCOM said Indian tech industry contributed an estimated over USD 375 million during this period to the U.S. Treasury including helping America secure its borders.  In a recent interview, NASSCOM president R. Chandrashekhar described the fee as unjustified.  “It had nothing to do with the IT industry. It was applied in an inequitable way, which specifically targeted Indian companies,” he said, adding that he would welcome any move to eliminate the fee.

The Congress can still come up with a legislation to reinstall the discriminatory H-1B fee, which lapsed yesterday night, Congressional sources said.  However, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE-USA) in a statement criticised the U.S. Congress for the lapse of the H-1B fee.

India, U.S. Working On Pact To Exempt Certain People From Immigration Checks

India and the U.S. are working on a pact that will exempt a certain category of Indians, like former Presidents, Prime Ministers and other “high dignitaries”, big industrialists and some film stars, from immigration checks in America.

Top immigration officials of the two countries recently held a meeting for implementation of the Global Entry, a US Customs and Border Protection programme that allows expedited clearance for pre-approved, low-risk travellers upon arrival in the United States.

The meeting discussed what categories of people from India could be exempted from the immigration checks in the US, sources said. In this context, the names of former President Pratibha Patil, former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, industrialists Mukesh Ambani and Gautam Adani and film stars Amitabh Bachchan and Shahrukh Khan were specifically mentioned, they said.

Significantly, Shahrukh was once detained at a US airport because his name resembled that of somebody on the watchlist. “The US has been pressing for India’s inclusion in the Global Entry so that high dignitaries, frequent flyers and top industrialists could visit America without any hassle,” a source said.

Individuals included in the list enter the US through automatic kiosks at select airports. At airports, programme members proceed to Global Entry kiosks, present their machine-readable passport or US permanent resident card, place their fingerprints on the scanner for fingerprint verification and complete a customs declaration.

The kiosk issues the traveller a transaction receipt and directs the traveller to baggage claim and the exit. Two foremost criteria for inclusion of the Global entry programme for any individual is that he or she should not have any criminal record or anyway connected with any money laundering case.

So far, citizens of seven countries are getting benefits of America’s Global Entry programme. The countries are The Netherlands, Panama, South Korea, Germany, Peru, Mexico, Canada. Brazil and India are likely to be part of the programme next year.

“Discussions are continuing. We expect it to kick off for Indian citizens some time in next year. If the programme becomes successful, the list would be enhanced,” the sources said. India proposes to prepare a list, which will initially have around 2,000 individuals like top industrialists, film stars, former occupants of high ranking posts and frequent flyers, the sources said.

Every applicant will have to go through a rigorous background check by Indian security agencies before sending the name to the US authority which will give the final nod after again doing a thorough background check.

Security agencies will keep doing background check of every individual included in the list periodically and if any adverse report comes in-between, the individual will be removed from the list, they said. However, even in case someone is removed from the elite list, such person can still enter USA but will have to go through the routine processes.

The idea behind the Global Entry programme is to reduce pressure on US immigration officials as they would have no role if anyone carrying the machine-readable passport arrives at the designated airports.

The official said in later phases, the government would launch a dedicated website where any Indian can apply online to be included for the programme. Travellers must be pre-approved for the Global Entry program. All applicants undergo a rigorous background check and in-person interview before enrolment.

While Global Entry’s goal is to speed travellers through the process, members may still be selected for further examination when entering the United States. Any violation of the program’s terms and conditions will result in the appropriate enforcement action and termination of the traveller’s membership privileges. As of December 2014, Global Entry was available at 42 US airports and 12 preclearance locations.

Ambassador Arun K. Singh Visits Chicago

Ambassador Arun K. Singh visited Chicago from 27th to 28th August, 2015. During the visit, Ambassador Singh had useful interactions with Governor Bruce Rauner, Mayor of Chicago Rahm Emanuel, Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, Congressman Danny Davis, President of the Chicago University Mr Robert J. Zimmer, President of the Art Institute of Chicago Dr. Douglas Druick and Mr Pradeep K. Khanna, Associate Chancellor, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign and several senior government functionaries, Illinois business leaders, besides prominent members of the Indian-American community, including academicians, scientists and members of the judiciary.

On August 27, 2015 Ambassador Singh had a detailed interaction with Governor Bruce Rauner and his high-level Economic Team comprising of Mr James (Jim) Schultz, Director of the Illinois Department of Commerce & Economic Opportunity, Mr. Hardik Bhatt, Chief Information Officer (CIO) of the State of Illinois, Mr. Erik T. Brejla, Head of Strategic Partnerships, Office of International Trade and Investment, State of Illinois, Ms. Christinet T. Dubley, Director, Illinois Film Office and Ms. Kelley Folino, Deputy Chief of Staff for Outreach, Office of the Governor. The Ambassador was accompanied by Dr Ausaf Sayeed, Consul General of India, Chicago, Shri O.P.Meena, Consul and Ms. Gunjan Bajpayee, Marketing Assistant.

Ambassador Singh mentioned about the growing strategic convergence and expanding economic cooperation between India and the US, with bilateral trade in goods and services exceeding US$ 120 billion. He mentioned that the Indian investments in US has grown significantly in the last five years, reaching US$15 billion and this has helped in the creation of 90,000 jobs in the US.

Ambassador Singh extended an invitation to Governor Bruce Rauner to lead a high-level trade mission to India in near future, which was accepted by Governor Rauner in principle. Ambassador Singh stated that the visit would definitely enhance ongoing business and economic cooperation between India and the State of Illinois, which is the largest trading partner of India in the US Midwest with a two-way trade of over US$ 2 billion.

Ambassador Arun K. Singh was warmly welcomed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel at his office on August 27, 2015. Ambassador Singh briefed Mayor Emanuel on various economic reforms initiated by the Government of India which had led to unprecedented and attractive business opportunities for Chicago companies including in the fields of healthcare, infrastructure, renewal energy and education.

arun singh in chaicagoAmbassador Singh spoke about the historical connection between Chicago and India, recalling the visit of Swami Vivekananda in 1893 to deliver his landmark address at the Parliament of World Religions. Ambassador Singh agreed with Mayor Emanuel on the need to further strengthen the Sister City relationship between New Delhi and Chicago in the realm of healthcare, education, trade & commerce and art & culture.

Consul General Dr Ausaf Sayeed thanked the Mayor for his support to the International Yoga Day, ‘Eye on India’, ‘Ragamala’ and the South Asian Film Festival. Mayor Emanuel acknowledged that the shooting of Indian films, had generated significant attention in Chicago. He said that he would be happy if more such shootings take place in Chicago. Mayor Emanuel accepted Ambassador’s invitation to lead a high-level trade mission to India in the near future.

During his visit the Ambassador interacted with several entrepreneurs and business leaders of Chicago. On August 27, 2015 he addressed a Business Round Table hosted by the World Business Chicago in collaboration with theDelhi Committee of the Chicago Sister Cities International. On August 28, 2015 he addressed CEOs of several US companies during a Business Round Table organized by the Illinois Chambers of Commerce in collaboration with the Illinois Department of Commerce & Economic Opportunity.

Ambassador visited the Art Institute of Chicago and met with Dr. Douglas Druick, President, Mr David Thurm, Chief Operating Officer, Art Institute of Chicago and other officials where he reviewed the Vivekananda Memorial Programme for Museum Excellence and other India-specific programs of the Art Institute. Ambassador Singh also visited the Fullerton Hall where Swami Vivekananda’s plaque has been installed.

Ambassador visited the University of Chicago (UC) campus and had detailed discussions with Mr. Robert J. Zimmer, President of UC, Mr Ian Solomon, Vice-President and Dean Ms. Martha Roth on the ways and means of strengthening India’s educational collaboration with the University of Chicago.

Ambassador Singh reviewed the functioning of the “Vivekananda Chair” set up in 2014 with an endowment from India’s Ministry of Culture in commemoration of the 150th Birth Anniversary of Swami Vivekananda. Ambassador Singh conveyed his appreciation to the University for offering undergraduate programmes in several Indian languages including Bengali, Hindi, Malayalam, Marathi, Pali, Sanskrit, Tamil, Telugu and Urdu.

In a separate meeting with officials of the University of Illinois from the campuses of Urbana-Champaign and Chicago, the Ambassador expressed his satisfaction with their longstanding ongoing collaborations with India, including with prestigious Indian institutions such as IIT (Kharagpur), GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology(Pant Nagar), Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (Jabalpur) etc. During a reception hosted by Consul General Dr Ausaf Sayeed in honour of Ambassador on 27th August, 2015, Ambassador Singh lauded the 100,000-strong Indian-American community in Chicago for their valued contribution to the State of Illinois and for acting as a useful bridge between the two countries

Promoting Culture of Peace Through Dialogue

This week, for the fourth time in a row, the annual gathering of the apex intergovernmental body of the United Nation deliberating on peace and non-violence will take place at the U.N. headquarters in New York. President of the ongoing 69th session of the General Assembly Sam Kahamba Kutesa has convened the fourth U.N. High Level Forum on the Culture of Peace on Sep. 9.

This daylong event is an opportunity for U.N. Member States, U.N. system entities, media and civil society interested in discussing the ways and means to promote the Culture of Peace and to join the discourse on strengthening the global movement for the implementation of the U.N. Declaration and Programme of Action on the Culture of Peace as adopted by consensus by the General Assembly on Sep. 13, 1999.

It also creates a platform for various stakeholders to have an exchange on the emerging trends and policies that can significantly impact on advancing the culture of peace.

The adoption of the Declaration and Programme of Action on Culture of Peace was a watershed event as a possible response to the evolving dynamics of global war and security strategies in a post-Cold War world. It has been an honour for me to Chair the nine-month long negotiations that led to the adoption of the Declaration and Programme of Action.

This historic norm-setting document is considered as one of the most significant legacies of the United Nations that would endure generations. I would always treasure and cherish that. For me this has been a realisation of my personal commitment to peace and my humble contribution to humanity.

In the responsibility that the United Nations – as the only universal body – must shoulder in fulfilling its Charter obligation of maintaining international peace and security worldwide, stronger focus on prevention and peace building is essential.

The United Nations needs to be more than a fire brigade rushing in to put out the conflagrations and then withdraw from the scene without doing anything to ensure that fires do not break out again.

In a historical perspective it is worthwhile to note that asserting and re-affirming the commitment of the totality of the United Nations membership to build the Culture of Peace, the General Assembly has been adopting resolutions on the subject every year since 1997.

The Assembly, through its annual substantive resolutions, has highlighted the priority it attaches to the full and effective implementation of these visionary decisions which are universally applicable and sought after by the vast majority of all peoples in every nation. It recognises the need for continuous support to the strengthening of the global movement to promote the Culture of Peace, as envisaged by the United Nations, particularly in the current global context.

The Forum in 2013 included Ministerial level participation and at its 68th session, the General Assembly adopted, by consensus, Resolution 68/125 on “Follow-up to the Declaration and Programme of Action on a Culture of Peace”, which was co-sponsored by 105 Member States.

This year the keynote speaker at the Forum is the fifth grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, Mr. Arun Gandhi, who prides calling himself “The Peace Farmer” as he sows the seeds of peace and non-violence following the footsteps of his grandfather whose birthday on Oct. 2 is observed by the United Nations and the international community as the International Day of Non-Violence.

He builds on the message of last year’s keynote speaker Ms. Leymah Gbowee, 2011 Nobel Peace Prize laureate who is a global legend leading civil society activism for peace and equality. Of course, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon will join the Forum at the opening with his ardent advocacy for the culture of peace.

The 2015 Forum will comprise of two multi-stakeholders interactive panels which will focus on: (1) “Promotion of the Culture of Peace in the context of the Post-2015 sustainable development agenda; and (2) “Role of the media in the promotion of the culture of peace”.

This High Level Forum is taking place at a time of some of the worst violence against civilians we have seen in recent years. Clearly, the hope that the new millennium would be a harbinger of peace has turned out to be rather misplaced.

The lesson in this, I believe, is that however much the world around us changes, we cannot achieve peace without a change in our own minds, and thereby in the global consciousness.

The wealth and the technology can only open up the opportunity to better the world. We must have the mind to seize that opportunity; we must have the culture of peace developed in each one of us both as an individual as well as a member of the global society.

Also, we must remember that technology and wealth can be put to destructive use too. The difference between war and peace, between poverty and prosperity, between death and life, is essentially prompted in our minds.

Peace is integral to human existence — in everything we do, in everything we say and in every thought we have, there is a place for peace. Absence of peace makes our challenges, our struggles, much more difficult. I believe that is why it is very important that we need to keep our focus on creating the culture of peace in our lives.

One lesson I have learned in my life over the years is that to prevent our history of war and conflict from repeating itself – the values of non-violence, tolerance, human rights and democratic participation will have to be germinated in every man and woman – children and adults alike.

When we see what is happening around us, we realise the urgent need for promoting the culture of peace – peace through dialogue – peace through non-violence. In a world where tragedy and despair seem to be everywhere, there is an urgent need – if not an imperative – for a global culture of peace.

Each of us can make an active choice each day through seemingly small acts of love, compassion, forgiveness, empathy, cooperation or understanding, thereby contributing to the culture of peace. Eminent proponents of peace have continued to highlight that the culture of peace should be the foundation of the new global society.In today’s world, more so, it should be seen as the essence of a new humanity, a new global civilisation based on inner oneness and outer diversity.

(Ambassador Chowdhury is Chair of the U.N. General Assembly Drafting Committee for the Declaration and Programme of Action on Culture of Peace).

David Cameron to review visa policy for Indian students

Britain’s very own home affairs select committee now wants prime minister David Cameron to review its earlier decision to abolish the post study work visa which allowed international students to work for two years in UK after finishing their education here.

In an exclusive interview with the media, the chairman of the highly influential House of Commons committee Keith Vaz said, “Yes, we absolutely should review this policy. When looking at this situation, the home affairs select committee recommended a review of post study work visas to alleviate the clearly negative elements of the current policy”.

Vaz who was recently appointed the vice-chairman of the Labour Party added to TOI, “At present, we are seeing an unprecedented decline in the number of Indian students, which is a serious problem for our educational institutions, our economy and for the students themselves, who have been dissuaded from attending some of the most prestigious universities in the world”.

According to Vaz, “the best way to establish relations between countries is through young people from India coming to study in the UK”. He added, “I want them to come and study in London, Leicester and Liverpool”.

This comes a day after Scotland told TOI of its plans to introduce a special visa that will allow Indian students to work in Scotland at least for two years after they finish their education degree there. Post-study work visa was abolished by the UK government in April 2012. This had led to a 50 per cent dip in Indian students visiting British universities for higher education.

Scotland’s Europe and international development minister Humza Yousaf said Scotland plans to start the fresh talent working in Scotland scheme visa. This visa will be for Indian students to study in a Scottish university post which they can work only in Scotland.

In an earlier report, the home affairs select committee had said that any cap on student visas would be unnecessary and undesirable. It had said, “Any cap could seriously damage the UK’s higher education industry and international reputation. We fully support the government in seeking to eliminate bogus colleges and deterring bogus students from even attempting to enter the UK. International students make up 10 per cent of first degree students and over 40 per cent of postgraduate students at UK universities. It is important to note that international students do not take up places that could otherwise be taken up by UK students. They pay more than UK students for their courses and, in effect, subsidize the educational system in the UK”.

International students in UK universities come from over 190 countries. The UK is just below the US in terms of the total number and diversity of international students in its higher education institutions. In total, during the 2013/14 academic year, international students contributed £1,003 million in fee income to London universities.

A recent report said, “We estimate that the direct income from tuition fees contributed £1,317 million to UK GDP; £717 million directly, £183 million via the supply chain and £417 million via the spending of employees. In addition, the £1,003 million in tuition fee income from international students generated a total of 32,800 jobs. We estimate that, in total, friends and relatives that visit international students in London spent £62 million in 2013/14. This spending will contribute £65 million to UK GDP”.

In 2013-14 there were almost 67,500 international students attending London universities – making up 18% of the total student population in the capital, and 22% of the 3,10,000 international students across the UK. The decline in Indian students choosing to study at UK universities has been flagged up as a worrying trend as a new study said that international students coming here contribute nearly 2.3 billion pounds to the British economy every year.

Indian Embassy Organizes Visa Camp in U.S.

In pursuance of its objective of providing easy, efficient and quality consular services to the applicants, Embassy of India, Washington DC, through its Service Provider – Cox and Kings Global Services (CKGS), organized an Indian Visa Camp at Windsor Mill (Baltimore), Maryland on Saturday, August 29, 2015. The Camp was held with support from ISKCON Baltimore and Baltimore Fest. The Visa Camp was also supported by Maryland India Business Roundtable, India Samaj Baltimore, Shreyas Panchigar Foundation, Gujarati Samaj of Metropolitan Washington, Sikh Association of Baltimore, Guru Nanak Foundation of America, Capitol Area Telugu Society and American Telugu Association from Baltimore.

The day long Visa camp was inaugurated by Prasanna Shrivastava, First Secretary (Consular), Embassy of India, Washington DC and Dr. Neeraj Verma of ISKCON Baltimore, accompanied by Amrish Patel of AB Consultants, Elisha Pulivarthi of MIBRT and Mr. Shreyas Panchigar of Shreyas Panchigar Foundation. Also present were Shyam Pandey and Shalini Sood of Baltimore Fest.

About 150 applications for visa, Overseas Citizens of India and Renunciation Certificates were received during the day long camp inaugurated by first secretary (Consular) Prasanna Shrivastava, a media release said on Monday. During the interaction with the Indian-American Community, Shrivastava apprised the participants of the recent initiatives taken by the Embassy for providing efficient and predictable consular services to the applicants. The visa camp, through its Service Provider Cox and Kings Global Services, was held this week with support from ISKCON Baltimore and Baltimore Fest.

It was also supported by India Samaj Baltimore, Maryland India Business Roundtable, Shreyas Panchigar Foundation, Gujarati Samaj of Metropolitan Washington, Sikh Association of Baltimore, Guru Nanak Foundation of America, Capitol Area Telugu Society and American Telugu Association from Baltimore. Last such visa camp was held at Raleigh in North Carolina in May.

USIBC Calls for Expansion of H-1B Visas

There is a growing argument for and against the issue of H-1B Visa that allows skilled foreiners to come and work in the US, the land of opportunities. Arguing that limiting the number of H-1B visas would have an impact on the global competitiveness of American firms, an influential Indo-U.S. business advocacy group has called for expanding the number of work visas granted to foreign technology professionals each year.

“One of the areas the U.S. has to look at is H-1B. How do you expand that? By limiting the number (of H-1B visas) and making it expensive, it does have an impact on U.S. companies,”Mukesh Aghi, president of the U.S. India Business Council told the media.

Under congressionally mandated existing laws, every year the U.S. grants 60,000 H-1B visas and another 20,000 to foreign professionals who get higher degrees from a U.S. university. This year the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services received thousands more applications for H-1B visas than it could grant, forcing it to decide on successful applicants through a computerized drawing of lots.

Documented research and statistics have proven time and again that H-1B is one of the major drivers of the U.S. economy, particularly in the field of innovation and entrepreneurship. While H-1B is not a major issue this presidential election cycle, New York-based real estate tycoon Donald Trump, who is leading the Republican presidential polls, came out with a recommendation to increase the salary for H-1B visa holders, which along with his other proposals would make it tough for U.S. companies to hire foreign workers on H-1B visas.

Indian technology professionals are one of the major beneficiaries of H-1B visas. For quite some time, leading U.S. technology companies, including Microsoft, Facebook and Google, have been calling for an abolishment of the limit on H-1B visas.      In response to a question, Aghi dismissed the recent proposal of Trump.

“Politicians make proposals just to attract votes. Our position is that Indian workers who come on H-1B visas do bring efficiency and competency to U.S. companies,” said Aghi, who before joining USIBC was a member of the board of directors and CEO of Larsen and Toubro InfoTech.

“We support H-1B, and we would like to expand it,” he said. When asked about Trump’s proposal to hike the basic salary of H-1B visa proposals, the USIBC president said no one can “dictate” to corporations what kind of salary it needs to pay its employees. “It is not the business of the government to be in business,” he asserted, adding that it should be decided by market forces. If India does the same thing, where you have to pay a minimum salary to U.S. people coming to India, then it does have an impact on the U.S. cost structure. It can be reciprocal. Not just with India but with any other country,” he observed.

US Unveils Visa Modernization Initiative

The US Government has unveiled a proposal designed to streamline various immigration procedures, including the process of applying for a T visa – for victims of human trafficking – or a U visa – for victims of crime and domestic violence, which has been applauded by Suman Raghunathan, Indian American executive director of South Asian Americans Leading Together.

DHS will now allow victims of domestic violence to self-petition for a permanent visa and simultaneously apply for work authorization. The Obama administration unveiled a proposal July 15 designed to streamline various immigration procedures; critics concur, however, that legislative action is still necessary to clear huge backlogs in the system.

Last November, President Barack Obama announced an executive order that would allow about four million undocumented people to live and work legally in the U.S. The executive order also expands the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, as well as allotting more employment-based visas.

Congress immediately blocked the measure, saying the president had overstepped his role, but the Senate allowed the order to stand. Twenty-six states then filed suit to block implementation of the president’s mandate. Texas U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen issued a temporary injunction in February.

The White House Council of Economic Advisors has reported that the president’s executive actions, if fully implemented, would boost the U.S. gross domestic product to over $100 billion, expand the size of the American labor force, and raise average annual wages for U.S.-born workers by four percent over the next 10 years. The president’s actions would also cut the federal deficit by $30 billion in 2024, reported the three-member Council.

In keeping with the president’s mandate, Cecilia Munoz, director of the White House Domestic Policy Council, introduced a report July 15, “Modernizing and Streamlining Our Legal Immigration System for the 21st Century,” which highlights a number of new actions that federal agencies will undertake to improve the visa processing experience.

“Currently, the process to apply for a visa is complex, paper-based, and confusing to the user,” said Munoz. “Many immigration documents pass through various computer systems and change hands no fewer than six times,” she said, adding: “Our goal is to modernize this process and deliver a positive experience to our users.”

A team of engineers from the U.S. Digital Service agency will work with the Department of Homeland Security to bring the majority of the visa application process online and deliver consistency and ease of use throughout. The administration stated it is aiming to reduce government costs, reduce burdens on employers who must verify that their employees are eligible to legally work in the U.S., and mitigate fraud and abuse of the immigration system.

The new actions simplify the H-1B application process, along with reducing the number of documents needed for applications and extensions of H-1B visas. The new action also simplifies the process under which an employer can directly sponsor students on F-1 visas for legal, permanent employment.

The process of applying for a T visa – for victims of human trafficking – or a U visa – for victims of crime and domestic violence – has also been simplified. “There are numerous avenues for humanitarian relief provided to vulnerable individuals in our immigration system. However, many of our existing policies and regulations do not reflect the most recent laws. These recommendations will improve our system for individuals seeking humanitarian relief,” said the White House in a statement.

Suman Raghunathan, Indian American executive director of South Asian Americans Leading Together, cheered the simplification of the T and U visa application process and noted that DHS will now allow victims of domestic violence to self-petition for a permanent visa and simultaneously apply for work authorization. Currently, many victims of domestic violence remain in abusive households as their immigration status is linked to their spouse’s status. An abusive partner can hold immigration status as a weapon to keep a spouse in her place, note agencies that work with domestically-abused women.

But the action plan falls short of providing relief for many immigrants, said Raghunathan in a press statement. “The job is not done,” she said, adding that the plan cannot address visa backlogs, which require legislative action.

“Today’s announcement only further underscores the importance of the continued push for comprehensive immigration reform legislation that includes a path to citizenship,” said Raghunathan. “Our nation and our communities continue to need just and inclusive immigration reform legislation that includes a pathway to citizenship, keeps families together, and expands economic opportunity for all aspiring Americans. We remain committed to that ultimate goal,” she said.

In related news, Commerce Department Secretary Penny Pritzker July 15 commented on the value of immigrants to the U.S.’s economic growth goals at National Council of La Raza’s Annual Conference in Kansas City, Missouri.

“To succeed in the global economy, our path forward must ensure that America continues to be a place where anyone can contribute their ideas and abilities to our prosperity,” said Pritzker. “The United States has been built, strengthened, and sustained by generation after generation of immigrants. This remains true today.”

“Advancing permanent, comprehensive immigration reform is not just a moral obligation; it is a matter of economic necessity. If we do not welcome the best and brightest to our shores, if we do not attract the top minds, workers, and innovators to our communities: put simply, we will be left behind,” she said.

Pritzker said she was also inspired by undocumented youth, who are known as DREAMers.

“Every time I meet a DREAMer, I come away moved by their stories, inspired by their potential, and more committed than ever to their cause. They want the chance to change the course of their lives and participate in our economy. They want to be a part of America’s success in the years to come. Yet they too often sit in limbo,” she said.

India Urges US To Settle Social Security Payment Of Its Workers

Washington, DC: Wages paid to nonresident aliens employed within the United States by an American or foreign employer, in general, are subject to Social Security/Medicare taxes for services performed by them within the United States, with certain exceptions based on their nonimmigrant status. Social Security/Medicare taxes are paid back to people after they retire within this country. Social Security is the largest social welfare program in the US, accounting for 37% of the government expenditure and 7% of GDP.

H-1B workers, for instance, in the United States pay Social Security and Medicare taxes, but many that don’t remain as permanent residents are unlikely to see any benefit from those payments., as they leave this country after their visa status ends and do not enjoy the benefits of their contributions after they retire.  These temporary workers from India alone are estimated to contribute over $1 Billion in Social Security Taxes per year.

India has urged the United States to set up a high-level committee to look into a range of issues including American Totalization and non-tariff barrier, as also the Social Security Act that discriminates Indians working in the U.S. The previous rounds of talks have taken place over a decade, with no results.

Commerce Secretary Rita Teaotia flagged these issues during her meeting with the U.S. Trade Representative Deputy Ambassador Robert Holleyman in the Indian Capital. She highlighted the “need for setting up a high-level group to discuss India’s concerns on the U.S. Totalization and Social Security Act (how the policy was discriminatory towards Indian workers in the U.S. who ended up losing their social security contributions due to discrepancy in the visa and social security regimes, also indicating recourse to legal remedies),” an official statement said.

India wants early conclusion of the totalization agreement or Social Security Agreement with the U.S. It aims to protect interests of professionals of Indian-origin who contribute more than $1 billion each year to the U.S. social security system. The National Association of Software and Service Companies (Nasscom), an Indian IT industry group, said that Indian firms and their employees are currently paying in excess of $1 billion annually in Social Security taxes and getting no benefit due to the absence of a totalization agreement with the U.S. Depending on what would emerge from negotiations between U.S. and Indian officials, a totalization agreement could also cut payroll costs for Indian IT providers.

Under this pact, professionals of both the countries would be exempted from social security taxes when they go to work for a short period in the other country. The U.S. already addresses the issue under “totalization agreements” with nearly two dozen countries. Those agreements, under which foreign workers pay only the social security-like taxes due their home countries, are mostly with developed countries in Western Europe that have benefit systems roughly parallel to the those of the U.S.

India has a large number of professionals who are making a significant contribution to the U.S. social security system but are leaving the U.S. after five or six years. The benefits don’t kick in for 10 years so they all return [to India] after making a contribution without benefiting in any manner. A totalization agreement would be “mutually beneficial” for U.S. workers in India.

India has signed totalization agreements with other developed countries, which could be used as reference benchmarks; we may have different systems. But the objectives are the same. The US has entered into a Totalization pact with 24 countries.

Daniel Costa, an immigration policy analyst at the Economic Policy Institute, estimates that the affected companies could save 14% on the labor costs associated with H-1B workers. “That would give companies another incentive to hire H-1Bs because that’s an extra 14% of savings,” he added. The net savings for Indian firms would depend on how much they have to contribute to India’s system.

A pact to return social security taxes would be a big blow to the US given the large number of Indian professionals who work for short durations in the US. If the pact does indeed come through, then the US would also be forced to take a hard look on how to reform the immigration system to induce skilled professionals from India to settle down permanently in the country, which would point to a more expedited way to push through Green Cards, primarily.

All peoples throughout all of human history have faced the uncertainties brought on by unemployment, illness, disability, death and old age. In the realm of economics, these inevitable facets of life are said to be threats to one’s economic security.

For the ancient Greeks economic security took the form of amphorae of olive oil. Olive oil was very nutritious and could be stored for relatively long periods. To provide for themselves in times of need the Greeks stockpiled olive oil and this was their form of economic security.

In medieval Europe, the feudal system was the basis of economic security, with the feudal lord responsible for the economic survival of the serfs working on the estate. The feudal lord had economic security as long as there was a steady supply of serfs to work the estate, and the serfs had economic security only so long as they were fit enough to provide their labor. During the Middle Ages the idea of charity as a formal economic arrangement also appeared for the first time.

Family members and relatives have always felt some degree of responsibility to one another, and to the extent that the family had resources to draw upon, this was often a source of economic security, especially for the aged or infirm. And land itself was an important form of economic security for those who owned it or who lived on farms.

Following the outbreak of the Great Depression, poverty among the elderly grew dramatically. The best estimates are that in 1934 over half of the elderly in America lacked sufficient income to be self-supporting. Despite this, state welfare pensions for the elderly were practically non-existent before 1930. A spurt of pension legislation was passed in the years immediately prior to passage of the Social Security Act, so that 30 states had some form of old-age pension program by 1935. However, these programs were generally inadequate and ineffective. Only about 3% of the elderly were actually receiving benefits under these states plans, and the average benefit amount was about 65 cents a day. Wages paid to resident aliens employed within the United States by an American or foreign employer are subject to Social Security/Medicare taxes under the same rules that apply to U.S. citizens.

-+=