U.S. Surgeon General Calls for Social Media Warning Labels to Combat Youth Mental Health Crisis

In an op-ed for The New York Times, U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy urged Congress to implement warning labels on social media platforms, akin to those found on tobacco and alcohol products. Murthy highlighted the adverse impact of social media on the mental health of young people, proposing that these warnings should inform users about the potential mental health risks associated with websites and apps.

Murthy’s call to action emphasizes the need for greater awareness of how social media can harm mental well-being, especially among the youth. He suggests that these warning labels would serve as a crucial alert for users, helping them understand the possible negative effects on their mental health.

For further insight and analysis, George Washington University (GWU) offers access to several experts. To arrange interviews, contact Katelyn Deckelbaum at [email protected].

One available expert is Lorenzo Norris, an associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and the chief wellness officer at the GW School of Medicine and Health Sciences. Norris brings a wealth of knowledge in psychiatry and behavioral sciences, making him a valuable resource for understanding the mental health implications of social media use.

Another expert, Amir Afkhami, holds a joint appointment at the GW School of Medicine and Health Sciences and the Milken Institute School of Public Health. Afkhami specializes in psychiatry, with his current work focusing on psychiatric services and education, behavioral health policy, and the mental health effects of conflict. His expertise provides a comprehensive perspective on the broader mental health challenges exacerbated by social media.

Lorien Abroms, a professor of prevention and community health at the GW Milken Institute School of Public Health, has conducted extensive research on how social media and digital communication technologies can be leveraged for health promotion. She is also knowledgeable about the potential negative impacts these technologies can have on teenagers and young adults. Abroms’ insights are particularly relevant in discussing the dual-edged nature of social media in both promoting health and contributing to mental health issues.

Tony Roberson, an associate professor of nursing at the GW School of Nursing, is another key expert. Specializing in mental health, he focuses on anxiety, depression, and childhood development. Roberson’s expertise can shed light on how social media influences mental health from a developmental and psychological standpoint, particularly in younger populations.

Vikram Bhargava, an assistant professor of strategic management and public policy, is an expert on technology addiction. His research delves into the unique ethical and policy issues arising from technology use within organizations. Bhargava authored a significant research article in Business Ethics Quarterly, titled “Ethics of the Attention Economy: The Problem of Social Media Addiction.” In this article, he argues that scholars, policymakers, and social media company managers need to address social media addiction as a serious moral issue. Bhargava contextualizes social media addiction by comparing it to other addictive products like cigarettes or alcohol, highlighting the ethical and policy challenges it presents.

Murthy’s op-ed not only raises awareness about the mental health dangers of social media but also calls for concrete measures to mitigate these risks. By implementing warning labels, similar to those on harmful substances like tobacco and alcohol, Murthy believes that users will be better informed about the potential harms. This proposal underscores the importance of addressing the mental health crisis exacerbated by social media, particularly among young people who are most vulnerable to its effects.

The involvement of experts from George Washington University further enriches the conversation with diverse perspectives and deep expertise. Lorenzo Norris’s background in psychiatry and wellness, Amir Afkhami’s focus on behavioral health policy and conflict-related mental health issues, Lorien Abroms’ research on digital communication and health promotion, Tony Roberson’s specialization in mental health and childhood development, and Vikram Bhargava’s analysis of technology addiction all contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the issue.

Murthy’s initiative to introduce social media warning labels is a proactive step toward safeguarding mental health. The parallels drawn between social media and addictive substances like tobacco and alcohol are crucial in framing the discussion. By recognizing social media addiction as a serious concern, similar to other forms of addiction, policymakers can take more informed and effective actions.

The experts from GWU provide valuable insights that can inform the development and implementation of these warning labels. Their research and analysis offer a multi-faceted view of how social media impacts mental health and what measures can be taken to mitigate these effects. The collaboration between medical professionals, public health experts, and policy specialists is essential in addressing the complex challenges posed by social media.

U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy’s call for social media warning labels is a significant proposal aimed at addressing the mental health crisis among young people. By drawing parallels with tobacco and alcohol warning labels, Murthy emphasizes the seriousness of the issue. The expertise available at George Washington University further enriches the conversation, providing a comprehensive view of the mental health impacts of social media and potential solutions. This initiative represents a critical step toward raising awareness and implementing measures to protect the mental well-being of social media users.

ACA Urges Caution in Integrating AI into Mental Health Counseling, Emphasizing Human Expertise

Artificial intelligence (AI) exhibits potential as a valuable aid in mental health services, educational counseling, and career guidance. However, the American Counseling Association (ACA), the primary body representing counseling professionals, emphasizes the importance of not substituting AI for human counselors.

The ACA’s AI Working Group has released guidelines to assist counselors and their clients in comprehending the benefits and limitations of integrating chatbots, robotics, and other emerging AI tools into mental health services. Russell Fulmer, PhD, LPC, chair of the working group and professor at Husson University, Bangor, Maine, stresses the necessity for clients to grasp the technical limitations, unresolved biases, and security risks associated with AI before incorporating it into counseling.

“While AI may present promising advantages, its assertions can occasionally be overly ambitious, unsupported by evidence, or even incorrect and potentially harmful,” the panel emphasizes in its recommendations.

AI technologies are engineered to replicate human-like reasoning, decision-making, and language comprehension. Counselors currently utilize them to streamline administrative tasks, such as progress reports for clients, according to Olivia Uwamahoro Williams, PhD, NCC, LPC, a clinical assistant professor at the College of William & Mary and an ACA working group member. Some counselors are encouraging clients to utilize AI chatbots to aid in understanding and managing their thoughts and emotions between therapy sessions, Fulmer notes.

However, as highlighted by the ACA panel, these algorithms inherit the fallibilities and biases of their human creators. There’s a risk that AI tools may rely on data that overlooks specific communities, particularly marginalized groups, potentially resulting in culturally insensitive care. Additionally, there’s a possibility of disseminating false claims or inaccurate information. Despite their potential as diagnostic aids, AI tools cannot replicate the professional judgment and expertise necessary to accurately assess an individual’s mental health requirements.

“Unlike human counselors, AI lacks the ability to comprehensively consider a client’s intricate personal history, cultural background, and diverse symptoms and factors,” the guidelines underscore. “Hence, while AI can be a supportive tool, it should not supplant the professional judgment of professional counselors. It is advisable to utilize AI as a supplement to, rather than a substitute for, the expertise provided by professional counselors.”

The ACA panel recommends that clients take the following into consideration:

  1. Ensure your provider educates you on what AI can and cannot provide so you can make informed decisions regarding its use in your counseling.
  2. To safeguard confidentiality, confirm that the AI tools you utilize comply with federal and state privacy laws and regulations.
  3. Discuss with your counselor strategies to mitigate the risks of AI tools providing misinformation or factual errors that could jeopardize your well-being.
  4. Refrain from utilizing AI for crisis response; instead, seek assistance from crisis hotlines, emergency services, and other qualified professionals.

Providers are urged by the working group to develop a comprehensive understanding of AI technologies, their applications in counseling services, and their implications for confidentiality and privacy. Fulmer stresses the necessity for counselors to undergo thorough and ongoing training in the evolving applications of AI.

“We have an ethical obligation to ensure our competence in anything we utilize,” he asserts. “Thus, one of our recommendations is to enhance our understanding of AI.”

The panel also calls upon technology developers to involve clients and counselors in the design of pertinent AI tools. This inclusion of users will ensure that AI tools are client-centered and address practical needs.

ACA assumes a leadership role in ensuring the responsible use of AI in mental health services, according to Shawn Boynes, FASAE, CAE, the organization’s chief executive officer.

“The integration of AI and its impact on mental health is expanding rapidly in various ways that we are still exploring,” Boynes remarks. “As one of numerous mental health organizations dedicated to well-being, we aim to lead by offering solutions to help address future concerns.”

-+=