Elon Musk often alternates between advocating for economic goals like mass migration and prioritizing his political aim of safeguarding America’s entrepreneurial and high-trust culture. Meanwhile, Congress remains a formidable barrier to Indian migrants’ demand for increased green card access.
“If they attempt to do this once again in a reconciliation package, we’re going to beat them, and we’re going to beat them soundly,” declared Kevin Lynn, founder of the U.S. Techworkers advocacy group. His organization strongly opposes white-collar migration, arguing that it disproportionately shifts middle-class wealth to corporate executives and investors.
Indian Migrants’ Uphill Battle
Indian migrants’ fight for more green cards faces steep challenges and limited allies in Congress. Most of these migrants were brought to the U.S. by corporate investors and executives to fill mid-skill white-collar positions, roles that might otherwise have gone to young American professionals.
Several visa programs—such as H-1B, L-1, J-1, TN, OPT, CPT, and H4EAD—allow companies to hire low-wage foreign graduates, often without requiring job offers to Americans or any skill assessments. Indian workers receive around 70% of these visas, which are often uncapped and advantageous for employers.
In 2023 alone, approximately 69,000 Indian nationals were granted H-1B visas, with another 210,000 receiving three-year visa extensions, according to Indian sources. Estimates suggest at least 600,000 Indians currently hold U.S. white-collar jobs via H-1B visas, with more than 500,000 employed under other visa categories.
Many visa programs permit employers to entice workers with the prospect of green cards and eventual U.S. citizenship. This system, established in 1990, has drawn millions of Indian graduates to U.S. white-collar roles, where they endure long hours and low pay in hopes of gaining approval from their superiors. This green card “bonus” benefits executives, who can turn $1 in payroll savings into $20 in added stock value.
However, this influx has led to a backlog of over 1.2 million Indian workers and family members awaiting green cards. The federal cap of 140,000 green cards per year—divided among applicants from various countries—has created fierce competition among Indian workers.
Systemic Exploitation
India’s government and ethnic networks within U.S. companies actively support the influx of Indian workers, creating hiring pipelines that often sideline American employees. Indian managers and subcontractors frequently oversee foreign hires, a system preferred by corporate boards. “U.S. executives see their American workforce as being expensive, undeserving, and expendable,” Lynn remarked.
These discriminatory networks also extend to other countries where Indians work and are rooted in U.S. pro-migration policies implemented since the 1990s. Many migrants resort to unethical practices, such as submitting duplicate applications or falsifying credentials, as they compete for visas and green cards.
Critics argue this system undermines corporate quality, innovation, and long-term investment, while damaging national prosperity. Jessica Vaughan, policy director at the Center for Immigration Studies, likened it to the exploitation seen during the Industrial Revolution. “You had business owners so far removed from their workers that they saw them as just a factor of production,” she said.
This investor-driven influx has also displaced many American graduates, with Indian technology managers and CEOs now dominating many Fortune 500 companies. It has further created security concerns, as untraceable foreign workers from countries like China and India develop and maintain critical U.S. infrastructure.
Legislative Pushback
Political resistance to these policies was evident in December 2022, when the pro-outsourcing EAGLE Act was defeated. Despite support from West Coast investors, growing bipartisan opposition led to its withdrawal. Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI) criticized the bill as “an end-run around the annual green card limit.”
To counter opposition, Indian lobbying groups argue that faster green card processing would benefit Americans. “If people don’t have green cards and if they live in the perpetual state of H-1B or L-1 status, that doesn’t work good for immigrants, that doesn’t work good for Americans,” said one advocate, Kapoor.
He emphasized the need for a “level playing field” to prevent the mistreatment of visa workers and argued for equal treatment across the board. Fresco, another proponent, claimed that speeding up green cards would eliminate incentives for companies to hire visa workers over Americans.
However, critics like Lynn dismissed these arguments, stating, “Their presence in this country’s labor market disadvantages Americans, and the quicker we can resolve that problem by sending them home or ending the programs, the better.”
Economic Implications
While establishment media often overlook the economic impact of white-collar migration, evidence of its effects on American graduates is mounting. The Wall Street Journal reported in May 2024 that entry-level tech hiring has declined, with job postings for software development roles dropping by 30% since pre-pandemic levels.
Meanwhile, the number of U.S. students majoring in computer and information science has surged by 40% in five years, reaching over 600,000 in 2023. Many of these graduates face bleak job prospects. “If you get a job, even if you don’t like it, you need to take it because you don’t know if you’re going to get anything else,” Cornell computer science major Alex Giang told reporters.
Lobbying Strategies
Fresco detailed the Indian lobbying plan, which involves educating members of Congress about their issues and engaging American workers to advocate on their behalf. “What is it going to require? It’s going to require educating every member of Congress what your problem is,” he said.
He encouraged migrants to highlight their contributions to local districts and to involve U.S. citizens in their lobbying efforts. “We need as many women [Indian] members as possible because we want to show this isn’t just a group for men,” Fresco added.
Indian advocacy groups have already conducted thousands of meetings with lawmakers, Fresco claimed, positioning themselves as key advisers on immigration issues. The green card campaign has gained support from Indian-American legislators like Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) and Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL).
Political Risks
Despite these efforts, the push for more green cards poses significant risks for both parties. Public opposition to labor migration continues to grow, particularly among families affected by stagnant job opportunities for American graduates.
Lynn pointed to parents of unemployed college graduates as a driving force behind this opposition. “The parents of kids who have graduated from prestigious universities with computer science degrees but are not getting job offers, are still at home—they know the reason,” he said.
The political fallout from pro-migration policies has been severe in the past. In 2018, Rep. Kevin Yoder (R-KS) lost his seat after supporting a green card expansion. Similarly, Democrats faced major losses after passing migration-friendly legislation in 2014 and 2020.
Conclusion
Indian migrants’ push for more green cards continues to face stiff resistance amid growing public and political awareness of its economic implications. While lobbying efforts intensify, critics argue that these policies harm American workers and undermine the country’s prosperity.
The debate underscores the broader challenges of balancing economic goals with the need to protect domestic labor markets and maintain national security.
