President Trump criticized the Senate’s blue slip tradition, claiming it undermines his judicial appointment powers and calling for a change in how nominees are handled.
President Donald Trump expressed strong discontent with the Senate’s “blue slip” tradition during a recent statement, labeling it an unconstitutional barrier to his appointment powers. He argued that this practice effectively grants Democrats veto power over his judicial nominees and U.S. attorney appointments.
Trump’s remarks came on Sunday as he highlighted his frustrations, stating that his rights have been “completely taken away” in states with a single Democratic senator. This assertion underscores his belief that the blue slip process hinders his ability to nominate judges and U.S. Attorneys effectively.
U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, who has defended the century-old blue slip tradition, views it as an essential norm that ensures balance and state input in the judicial nomination process. Grassley’s position reflects a commitment to preserving a system that has been in place for many years, despite Trump’s criticisms.
The blue slip tradition allows senators to express their approval or disapproval of a judicial nominee from their state. While it is a long-standing custom, it is not enshrined in law. Constitutionally, the president has the authority to nominate candidates, but the Senate retains the ultimate power to approve or reject those nominations.
Trump’s dissatisfaction with the blue slip practice is not a new development. Back in July, he referred to the tradition as a “hoax” and a “scam” that Democrats use to obstruct his nominees. He urged Grassley to cease supporting such practices, arguing that they prevent the president from appointing his preferred candidates.
In a pointed statement, Trump remarked, “Put simply, the president of the United States will never be permitted to appoint the person of his choice because of an ancient, and probably unconstitutional, ‘CUSTOM.’” His comments reflect a growing impatience with the nomination process, particularly as he seeks to fill judicial vacancies.
During his first term, Trump successfully appointed 234 federal judges, including three Supreme Court justices and 54 appellate court judges. However, his current term has seen a significant slowdown, with only five confirmations in the first seven months.
In his recent comments, Trump suggested that he is willing to exert pressure on Grassley and the Senate to expedite the nomination process. He stated, “The only candidates that I can get confirmed for these most important positions are, believe it or not, Democrats! Chuck Grassley should allow strong Republican candidates to ascend to these very vital and powerful roles, and tell the Democrats, as they often tell us, to go to HELL!”
These remarks come on the heels of a ruling by U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann, which determined that Alina Habba had unlawfully served as acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey beyond the 120-day limit set for temporary prosecutors. This ruling highlighted the administration’s use of unconventional methods to maintain her position.
Trump’s ongoing pressure campaign could significantly influence the number of judicial vacancies he is able to fill in the coming months, as he continues to advocate for a more streamlined nomination process.
Source: Original article