The Congress party is intensifying its campaign against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, drawing parallels to the controversial tenure of former election commissioner Naveen Chawla in 2009.
New Delhi: The Congress-led INDIA bloc is launching a vigorous campaign against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, even considering an impeachment motion amid allegations of voter fraud and perceived bias toward the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
Kumar has faced sharp criticism from opposition leaders after he indirectly challenged Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi to submit an affidavit or apologize for his repeated claims of “vote chori” in states like Karnataka, Maharashtra, and Haryana.
The opposition’s offensive against the Election Commission, particularly targeting Kumar, has drawn comparisons to events from 2009. At that time, the Congress party was in power at the Centre, and election commissioner Naveen Chawla, who later became the CEC, faced an unprecedented attempt by his superior, CEC N. Gopalaswami, to remove him due to alleged closeness to the Congress leadership.
The 2009 general elections, conducted in five phases starting on April 16, were held against the backdrop of the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, which exposed the weaknesses of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government in handling terrorism. Public outrage, fueled by insensitive remarks and actions from Union ministers, created a strong anti-UPA sentiment. Despite this, the UPA managed to secure a second term.
Chawla’s tenure was marred by allegations of partisanship, particularly regarding his ties to the Nehru-Gandhi family. The most notable rebuke came from within the Election Commission itself. On January 31, 2009, Gopalaswami recommended Chawla’s removal to the President of India without consulting fellow Election Commissioner S.Y. Quraishi.
This recommendation followed a meeting between Gopalaswami and a small NDA delegation in his chambers, where they accused Chawla of acting in a partisan manner to favor the Congress party. Gopalaswami alleged that Chawla had shared sensitive Election Commission information with Congress officials and had opposed issuing a notice to Congress president Sonia Gandhi regarding honors she received from Belgium—a complaint that Chawla and Quraishi had dismissed in a two-to-one majority.
Gopalaswami’s action marked a rare instance of a CEC publicly seeking the removal of a fellow commissioner, effectively accusing him of undermining the Commission’s impartiality. However, President Pratibha Patil rejected the recommendation, allowing Chawla, a 1969 batch IAS officer, to assume charge as CEC on April 20, 2009, and oversee the parliamentary elections.
Chawla’s tenure had long been controversial. The Shah Commission, led by former Chief Justice of India J.C. Shah, had declared him “unfit to hold any public office which demands an attitude of fair play and consideration for others” due to his role as a senior official in the 1970s. Although the Delhi High Court dismissed the Commission’s findings, the stigma attached to Chawla lingered.
Even before Gopalaswami’s intervention, the NDA had targeted Chawla. In March 2006, led by the BJP, the NDA submitted a memorandum to President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, signed by over 200 MPs, demanding Chawla’s removal as election commissioner. The government rejected this demand. In May 2006, Jaswant Singh, then Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, approached the Supreme Court for Chawla’s ouster, citing his ties with Congress politicians and issues related to the MPLADS scheme. This petition was later withdrawn after Gopalaswami asserted his authority to remove an election commissioner, although the Court left the questions open.
Despite the anti-UPA wave following the 26/11 attacks, the Congress-led alliance won the 2009 elections. No definitive evidence of electoral malpractice emerged, and party leaders maintain that the elections were fair, reflecting voter priorities such as economic policy.
Source: Original article