Tesla has revived its controversial ‘Mad Max’ mode in the latest Full Self-Driving update, prompting discussions about safety and regulatory scrutiny.
Tesla is once again in the spotlight with the reintroduction of its ‘Mad Max’ mode in the Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, following the recent launch of the FSD v14.1.2 update. This feature, which enables more aggressive driving behavior, comes at a time when the automaker is facing increased scrutiny from regulators and ongoing lawsuits from customers.
The latest update follows last year’s significant FSD v14 release, which introduced a more cautious driving profile known as “Sloth Mode.” In stark contrast, the newly revived Mad Max mode allows for higher speeds and more frequent lane changes compared to the standard Hurry profile setting.
According to Tesla’s release notes, the Mad Max mode is designed to make driving feel more natural for those who prefer a more assertive approach. However, the update has sparked mixed reactions from the public. While some Tesla enthusiasts praise the feature for its dynamic driving experience, critics warn that it could encourage risky behavior, particularly as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) investigate Tesla’s advanced driver-assist systems.
The Mad Max mode is not a new concept; it was first introduced in 2018 as part of Tesla’s original Autopilot system. At that time, CEO Elon Musk described it as ideal for navigating aggressive city traffic. The name, inspired by the post-apocalyptic film series, drew immediate attention due to its bold connotation.
Since the release of the latest update, drivers have reported instances of vehicles equipped with Mad Max mode rolling through stop signs and exceeding speed limits. These early reports suggest that the mode may exhibit even more assertive behavior than before, raising concerns about its implications for road safety.
The decision to bring back Mad Max mode may serve multiple purposes for Tesla. It showcases the company’s ongoing development of FSD software while appealing to drivers who favor a more decisive driving style. Additionally, it signals Tesla’s ambition to achieve Level 4 autonomy, even though its current system is classified as Level 2, necessitating constant driver supervision.
For Tesla, the reintroduction of this feature reflects confidence in its technological advancements. However, for observers, the timing raises questions. With multiple investigations and lawsuits currently underway, many anticipated that Tesla would prioritize safety over the introduction of more aggressive driving profiles.
Owners of Tesla vehicles equipped with Full Self-Driving (Supervised) can access Mad Max mode through the car’s settings under Speed Profiles. This mode offers a more assertive driving experience characterized by quicker acceleration, more frequent lane changes, and reduced hesitation.
It is crucial to note that Tesla’s Full Self-Driving system still requires active driver attention. Drivers must keep their hands on the wheel and remain prepared to take control at any moment. While the name suggests excitement and speed, safety and awareness should remain paramount.
For those sharing the road with Teslas, it is advisable to stay alert. Vehicles utilizing Mad Max mode may accelerate or change lanes more rapidly than expected, so providing extra space can help mitigate surprises and enhance safety for all road users.
The reintroduction of Mad Max mode by Tesla is both a strategic move and a provocative statement. It revives a feature from the company’s early Autopilot days while reigniting the debate over the balance between innovation and responsibility. The mode’s return serves as a reminder that Tesla continues to push the boundaries of driver-assist technology and public tolerance for it.
As Tesla navigates this complex landscape, the question remains: will the revived Mad Max mode represent a bold step toward greater autonomy, or will it prove to be a dangerous gamble in the race for self-driving dominance?
Source: Original article