Turbulence Increasing: World’s Bumpiest Flight Routes Identified

As climate change intensifies, turbulence on some of the world’s busiest flight routes is set to worsen, posing increasing challenges for air travel safety.

When a Delta flight en route from Salt Lake City to Amsterdam encountered severe turbulence last week, passengers found themselves tossed violently about the cabin, with some fearing the plane would crash. This sudden atmospheric disturbance forced an emergency landing in Minneapolis, where 25 individuals were subsequently hospitalized.

This alarming incident follows a series of recent turbulence-related events that have resulted in injuries, hospitalizations, and even fatalities. Last year, a 73-year-old passenger tragically succumbed to a heart attack during turbulence on a flight from London to Singapore.

Turbulence, an unpredictable atmospheric phenomenon, challenges pilots regularly. It occurs when airflow, usually smooth, is disrupted by obstacles such as mountains or storms, akin to a river encountering a boulder. While a majority of turbulence instances are minor, severe cases can result in structural damage to aircrafts and injuries to passengers. Between 2009 and 2024, turbulence was responsible for over 200 serious injuries in the United States, according to the US National Transportation Safety Board.

Although fatalities are rare, experts warn that turbulence, especially on heavily trafficked routes, appears to be on the rise, a trend exacerbated by global warming. Passengers are advised to consistently wear seatbelts to minimize injury risks.

The turbulence forecasting website, Turbli, has analyzed over 10,000 flight paths with data sourced from entities such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the UK Met Office. Their goal is to demonstrate that, while turbulence can seem chaotic, there are patterns to its occurrence, explained Ignacio Gallego Marcos, Turbli’s founder.

The route between Mendoza, Argentina, and Santiago, Chile, tops the list of the world’s most turbulent routes. This 120-mile journey across the Andes Mountains offers stunning vistas but also high turbulence, as mountain ranges significantly disrupt airflow, creating waves capable of traveling vast distances and causing turbulence.

Most of the globe’s top ten turbulent routes involve mountains. In the United States, routes that cross the Rocky Mountains — especially those involving Denver and Salt Lake City — are particularly prone to turbulence. In Europe, flights over the Alps connecting France, Italy, and Switzerland are similarly affected, as reported by Turbli.

Pilots recognize the challenges posed by mountainous areas, but turbulence there isn’t always predictable, due to minor topographical features that aren’t always detected during forecasts, according to Gallego Marcos. Turbulence can also originate in clear air, especially near jet streams — fast-moving air currents high in the atmosphere.

This clear-air turbulence results from “wind shear,” a rapid change in wind speed or direction with altitude, making it difficult to detect or predict, noted Piers Buchanan, aviation applications science manager at the UK Met Office. A prime example is the route between Natori and Tokoname in Japan, where a particularly strong jet stream leads to regular turbulence.

Historically, the strength of jet streams is governed by temperature differences; in Japan, this occurs where cold Siberian air meets warmer currents over the Pacific. A comparable phenomenon is observed on the US East Coast, influenced by the Gulf Stream meeting colder Canadian air, Buchanan explained. As global temperatures rise, such turbulence is increasing, with severe clear-air turbulence in the North Atlantic rising by 55% between 1979 and 2020, according to recent research.

Another significant source of turbulence is thunderstorms, notably pronounced near the equator due to strong vertical air movement. This type, however, doesn’t appear in Turbli’s rankings since pilots usually navigate around such weather systems using onboard and ground-based radar.

The unpredictability of thunderstorm turbulence remains a concern, as forecasts aren’t always accurate, and conditions can change rapidly, said Gallego Marcos. This unpredictability can place flights in difficult situations, as happened with a flight from London to Singapore that encountered severe storms over Myanmar.

As experts investigate the impact of climate change on turbulence, there is a growing consensus that a warmer atmosphere, which retains more moisture, could fuel more intense storms and turbulence. Robert Sharman, senior scientist emeritus at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, noted that the relationship between climate changes and turbulence is an evolving focus of study.

Despite the challenges, aviation remains the safest mode of transport, with planes designed to endure extreme turbulence and safety measures like seatbelts minimizing passenger risks. Joana Medeiros, a meteorology researcher at Reading University, highlighted advancements in forecasting, with current techniques accurately predicting approximately 75% of turbulence events.

Nevertheless, as climate change continues to progress, it is expected that some of the planet’s busiest air routes will become increasingly turbulent, driven by the intersection of a warming atmosphere and a growing aviation industry.

Air India Crash: Cockpit Voices Stir Controversy

Investigators continue to probe the mysterious circumstances behind the Air India Flight 171 crash, but the preliminary report has only fueled more questions about how the Boeing 787’s engines were cut off immediately after takeoff, leading to the tragic accident in Ahmedabad.

The preliminary report about the crash of Air India Flight 171, which resulted in the tragic loss of 260 lives in June, was expected to provide clarity but instead has incited further speculation among investigators, aviation analysts, and the public. A critical point of confusion remains: moments after takeoff, the fuel-control switches on the 12-year-old Boeing 787 inexplicably moved to “cut-off,” shutting off fuel to the engines and leading to complete power failure, a procedure typically reserved for after the aircraft lands.

The cockpit voice recording presents a puzzle, capturing one pilot asking why the other “cut-off” the fuel, with the response being unclear. During the takeoff, the co-pilot, Clive Kunder, was at the controls, while Captain Sumeet Sabharwal was monitoring. The pair collectively held over 19,000 hours of flight experience, with a significant portion on the Boeing 787.

After the switches returned to their inflight positions, the engines began to relight automatically. However, one engine had only begun regaining thrust while the other had not yet recovered fully. Tragically, within less than a minute, the plane crashed into a neighborhood in Ahmedabad, western India.

Amid numerous speculative theories that have arisen following the report, news outlets such as The Wall Street Journal and Reuters have noted shifting attention towards the senior pilot’s actions during the incident. Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera reported that the first officer repeatedly questioned the captain’s actions regarding the engine shutoff.

The wave of speculative reporting has drawn criticism from various quarters. India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) denounced the premature conclusions drawn by some media outlets, describing such actions as irresponsible given the ongoing nature of the investigation. Jennifer Homendy, chairperson of the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, also commented on X that these reports are speculative and reminded the media that investigations of this nature require time.

The Indian Commercial Pilots’ Association has condemned the quick attribution of blame to the crew, labeling it reckless and insensitive. In parallel, Sam Thomas, head of the Airline Pilots’ Association of India, has highlighted the need for comprehensive reviews that take into account maintenance history and cockpit data.

The report’s release has only compounded the complexity of the situation, as it included a brief excerpt of cockpit conversations without the full transcript, leaving many questions unanswered. The full cockpit voice recorder transcript is expected in the final report and should offer further clarity.

A Canadian air accident investigator suggested several scenarios about the switches’ operation, pondering whether they could have been moved unconsciously by pilot ‘B’ or if deliberate action by pilot ‘A’ was behind the incident, possibly with intent to deflect responsibility through the recorded dialogue. However, the identity of the speaker remains unverified, and establishing intent is challenging.

Moreover, some pilots speculate that a malfunction in the plane’s Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) system, responsible for monitoring engine health, could theoretically trigger an automatic shutdown if fed false sensor data. Nevertheless, the theory seems tenuous when considering the timeline and the pilot’s exclamation about the fuel cutoff.

Alternate explanations also surface, such as a potential electrical fire in the tail, underscored by reports from Indian newspapers like the Indian Express. However, the preliminary report confirms the engines’ shutdown was a result of the fuel switches’ movement, suggesting that any fire resulting from spilled fuel or damaged batteries occurred post-impact.

AAIB chief GVG Yugandhar reiterated that the preliminary report’s purpose is to outline the facts around ‘WHAT’ transpired, with the understanding that conclusive findings, root causes, and safety recommendations will follow in the final report. There will be updates provided on salient technical matters and public interest issues as they become relevant.

Ultimately, as noted by former airline accident investigator Shawn Pruchnicki, the fundamental question remains whether the incident was a case of deliberate actions or technological confusion. The investigation does not hastily accuse human error or malice, pointing instead to a wait for answers that may remain elusive.

-+=